diff --git a/data/03/92/87/039287E3FFF6FFCAFF41FD36FBB2FC46.xml b/data/03/92/87/039287E3FFF6FFCAFF41FD36FBB2FC46.xml index 7db591410ae..57450ac60d0 100644 --- a/data/03/92/87/039287E3FFF6FFCAFF41FD36FBB2FC46.xml +++ b/data/03/92/87/039287E3FFF6FFCAFF41FD36FBB2FC46.xml @@ -1,52 +1,53 @@ - - - -Revision of Scissurellidae, Anatomidae and Fissurellidae (Gastropoda: Vetigastropoda) from the Plio-Pleistocene of the Philippines + + + +Revision of Scissurellidae, Anatomidae and Fissurellidae (Gastropoda: Vetigastropoda) from the Plio-Pleistocene of the Philippines - - -Author + + +Author -Helwerda, Renate A. +Helwerda, Renate A. - - -Author + + +Author -Wesselingh, Frank P. +Wesselingh, Frank P. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2014 - -3838 + +2014 + +3838 - -2 + +2 - -183 -194 + +183 +194 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.3838.2.3 -b991b3bd-523c-4171-9412-85316ea1ec4b -1175-5326 -229062 -A3B0A5D4-D989-4804-9501-CE4423F146C9 +journal article +45180 +10.11646/zootaxa.3838.2.3 +b991b3bd-523c-4171-9412-85316ea1ec4b +1175-5326 +229062 +A3B0A5D4-D989-4804-9501-CE4423F146C9 - + -Fissurellidae +Fissurellidae indet. diff --git a/data/03/9C/AA/039CAA64607FFFFDFF633CA4D24AFE59.xml b/data/03/9C/AA/039CAA64607FFFFDFF633CA4D24AFE59.xml index f9cacc256d8..141ee5b8051 100644 --- a/data/03/9C/AA/039CAA64607FFFFDFF633CA4D24AFE59.xml +++ b/data/03/9C/AA/039CAA64607FFFFDFF633CA4D24AFE59.xml @@ -1,45 +1,45 @@ - - - -Revision of the genus Neozavrelia Goetghebuer, Thienemann, 1941 (Diptera Chironomidae) from Eastern Siberia and the Russian Far East, with the description of new species + + + +Revision of the genus Neozavrelia Goetghebuer, Thienemann, 1941 (Diptera Chironomidae) from Eastern Siberia and the Russian Far East, with the description of new species - - -Author + + +Author -Orel, Oksana V. +Orel, Oksana V. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2021 - -2021-03-01 + +2021 + +2021-03-01 - -4938 + +4938 - -3 + +3 - -251 -297 + +251 +297 -journal article -7894 -10.11646/zootaxa.4938.3.1 -02750558-eeb0-417a-813c-7c34b00a1979 -1175-5326 -4569580 -872AB368-FAFB-499B-B3E5-FB08BAC911A7 +journal article +7894 +10.11646/zootaxa.4938.3.1 +02750558-eeb0-417a-813c-7c34b00a1979 +1175-5326 +4569580 +872AB368-FAFB-499B-B3E5-FB08BAC911A7 - + @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ a–k - + Tanytarsus ginzanlemeus Sasa, Suzuki, 2001: 19 diff --git a/data/05/96/00/0596004CBC1D4091AD960CAC3F3D6518.xml b/data/05/96/00/0596004CBC1D4091AD960CAC3F3D6518.xml index f09bd391dc9..cafc571cef9 100644 --- a/data/05/96/00/0596004CBC1D4091AD960CAC3F3D6518.xml +++ b/data/05/96/00/0596004CBC1D4091AD960CAC3F3D6518.xml @@ -1,359 +1,359 @@ - - - -Description of Barathricola thermophilus, a new species from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent field in the Indian Ocean with redescription of the Barathricola type species (Crustacea, Copepoda, Cyclopoida) + + + +Description of Barathricola thermophilus, a new species from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent field in the Indian Ocean with redescription of the Barathricola type species (Crustacea, Copepoda, Cyclopoida) - - -Author + + +Author -Ivanenko, Viatcheslav N. +Ivanenko, Viatcheslav N. - - -Author + + +Author -Lee, Jimin +Lee, Jimin - - -Author + + +Author -Chang, Cheon Young +Chang, Cheon Young - - -Author + + +Author -Kim, Il-Hoi +Kim, Il-Hoi -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2019 - -865 + +2019 + +865 - -103 -121 + +103 +121 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.865.35827 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.865.35827 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.865.35827 -1313-2970-865-103 -9A0189C5540B4BF987C224EB5B74D5A1 -B1BB06918E85591FB716530C19A4B2BF +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.865.35827 +1313-2970-865-103 +9A0189C5540B4BF987C224EB5B74D5A1 +B1BB06918E85591FB716530C19A4B2BF - - - - -Barathricola + + + + +Barathricola thermophilus -sp. nov. -Figs 1 +sp. nov. +Figs 1 , -2 +2 , -3 +3 - -Type locality. - + +Type locality. + The hydrothermal vent field of OVF ( -11°24'52.97"S +11°24'52.97"S , -66°25'25.48"E +66°25'25.48"E ) on the Central Indian Ridge in the Indian Ocean; sediments at 2022 m in depth. - -Type material. -Holotype (♀, MABIK CR00244723) and paratypes (6 ♀♀, 6 ♂♂, MABIK CR00244724) have been deposited in the MABIK. Dissected paratypes (2 ♀♀, 1 ♂) are retained in the collection of the last author. All type specimens collected on 23 June 2018 from the type locality. + +Type material. +Holotype (♀, MABIK CR00244723) and paratypes (6 ♀♀, 6 ♂♂, MABIK CR00244724) have been deposited in the MABIK. Dissected paratypes (2 ♀♀, 1 ♂) are retained in the collection of the last author. All type specimens collected on 23 June 2018 from the type locality. - -Description of female. - + +Description of female. + Body ( -Fig. 1A +Fig. 1A ) slender. Length of dissected and described specimen 776 -μm +μm . Other three measured specimens 700, 710, and 715 -μm +μm , respectively. Prosome nearly oval, 400 -μm +μm long, slightly longer than urosome, consisting of cephalosome and four pedigerous somites. Greatest width of prosome 273 -μm +μm across cephalosome. Cephalosome with angular posterolateral corners. First to third pedigerous somites almost equal in length. Fourth pedigerous somite distinctly shorter and narrower than the third. Urosome ( -Fig. 1B +Fig. 1B ) slender, 5-segmented. Fifth pedigerous somite 38 -x +x 74 -μm +μm , broadened distally, with angular posterolateral corners. Genital double-somite 109 -x +x 70 -μm +μm , 1.56 times as long as wide, gradually narrowing posteriorly; genital aperture located dorsolaterally at 38% region of double-somite length. Three free abdominal somites 40 -x +x 47, 30 -x +x 42, and 50 -x +x 37 -μm +μm , respectively. Anal somite with large anal region and minute spinules along ventrodistal margin. Caudal ramus ( -Fig. 1C +Fig. 1C ) 116 -x +x 13 -μm +μm , 8.92 times as long as wide, more than twice as long as anal somite, armed with six setae and ornamented with row of spinules along ventrodistal margin; outer lateral seta located at 39% region of ramus length; spermatophore ( -Fig. 1D +Fig. 1D ) attached to female 60 -x +x 27 -μm +μm , with thick wall. - - + + Figure 1. - -Barathricola thermophilus + +Barathricola thermophilus sp. nov., female: -A +A habitus, dorsal -B +B urosome, dorsal -C +C right caudal ramus, ventral -D +D spermatophore -E +E rostrum -F +F antennule -G +G antenna -H +H mandible -I +I maxillule. Scale bars: 0.1 mm ( -A +A ), 0.05 mm ( -B +B ), 0.02 mm ( - -C-I + +C-I ). - + Rostrum ( -Fig. 1E +Fig. 1E ) triangular, with thin-walled lobate distal apex. Antennule ( -Fig. 1F +Fig. 1F ) 225 -μm +μm long, longer than cephalosome, and 14-segmented. Eleventh segment the longest. Armature formula 2-5-4-7-6-(2 + aesthetasc)-0-1-0-1-(2 + aesthetasc)-2-(2 + aesthetasc)-(6 + aesthetasc). Second and third segments each with a trace of one subdivision, and fourth segment with three subdivisions. First segment with two rows of fine spinules. Most of setae naked, except several feebly pinnate ones of proximal two segments. Aesthetascs broad, constricted at region slightly distal to middle, and attenuated distally. - + Antenna ( -Fig. 1G +Fig. 1G ) 4-segmented, consisting of basis and 3-segmented endopod. Basis unarmed, ornamented with several rows of minute spinules. First endopodal segment 36 -x +x 17 -μm +μm , with one seta on inner margin and minute spinules proximally and on outer margin. Second endopodal segment narrow proximally and gradually broadened distally, 30 -x +x 18 -μm +μm , armed with five setae (three distal and two smaller subdistal) and ornamented with row of minute setules on outer side. Third endopodal segment 23 -x +x 14 -μm +μm , armed with seven unequal setae distally, and ornamented with setules on outer side. - + Labrum weak, easily destroyed. Mandible ( -Fig. 1H +Fig. 1H ) consisting of coxa, basis, exopod, and endopod. Coxa with setules on outer margin; cutting margin of gnathobase with six acutely pointed teeth, two thin proximal setae, three setules between distal second and third teeth, and one small, transparent digitiform process bearing fine spinules distally between distal first and second teeth. Basis elongate, 42 -x +x 9 -μm +μm , bearing five or six setules subdistally. Exopod small, indistinctly 3-segmented, armed only with two setae on third segment, outer one of these setae sparsely pinnate and slightly longer than inner one. Endopod 2-segmented, armed with two and four setae on first and second segments, respectively, all six setae sparsely pinnate; first segment with several setules on medial margin. - + Maxillule ( -Fig. 1I +Fig. 1I ) with eight setae on praecoxal arthrite; second distal seta spiniform. Coxal endite absent. Epipodite with two unequal setae. Basis with four setae, three proximal and one distal. Exopod with four large setae distally; setae becoming longer from outer to inner margin. Endopod shorter than exopod, armed with five setae, one on medial margin, and four distally. - + Maxilla ( -Fig. 2A +Fig. 2A ) stout, 5-segmented, consisting of syncoxa, basis, and 3-segmented endopod. Syncoxa armed with 11 setae, grouped as four, one, three, and three on first to fourth endites, respectively; third and fourth endites ornamented with two spinules at distal region. Basis armed with three unequal setae (one large, proximally unarticulated, spiniform, one long, and one small setae) and ornamented with one spinule. First endopodal segment with four setae (two proximal and two distal). Second endopodal segment with two long setae; third endopodal segment small, with four setae (one long and three shorter). - - + + Figure 2. - -Barathricola thermophilus + +Barathricola thermophilus sp. nov., female: -A +A maxilla -B +B maxilliped -C +C leg 1 -D +D leg 2 -E +E leg 3. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. - + Maxilliped ( -Fig. 2B +Fig. 2B ) slender, 7-segmented, consisting of syncoxa, basis, and 5-segmented endopod. Syncoxa with several scattered rows of minute setules, and armed with three setae, proximal one small and naked. Basis with two setae and rather long setules on medial margin. Endopod armed with one, one, one, one, and three setae on first to fifth segments, respectively; middle seta on terminal segment naked, much longer than other setae, longer than basis and endopod combined. Articulation incomplete between third and fourth endopodal segments. - + Legs 1-4 ( - + Figs 2 -C-E +C-E ; -3A +3A ) with 3-segmented exopod and endopod, lacking inner seta on first exopodal segment; third exopodal segment distinctly broader than proximal segments. All intercoxal sclerites smooth without spinule/setule array along distal margin and on both anterior and posterior surfaces. Endopods of legs 1-3 shorter than exopod, but that of leg 4 distinctly longer than exopod. Leg 1 ( -Fig. 2C +Fig. 2C ) basis with seven thick setules on inner margin; inner distal spine large, 48 -μm +μm long, extending to middle of third endopodal segment, spinulose along both margins. Leg 2 ( -Fig. 2D +Fig. 2D ) with inner coxal seta characteristically bent at proximal quarter; outer seta on basis shorter than those of legs 1, 3 and 4. Inner distal corner of basis of legs 2-4 with pointed dentiform process. Leg 3 ( -Fig. 2E +Fig. 2E ) with two distal spines on third endopodal segment (outer spine ca. half as long as inner spine). Leg 4 ( -Fig. 3A +Fig. 3A ), third endopodal segment elongate, 3.6 times as long as wide; inner distal seta on second endopodal segment and two inner and one outer setae on third endopodal segment transformed to spines. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as in Table 1. - - + + Figure 3. - -Barathricola thermophilus + +Barathricola thermophilus sp. nov. female: -A +A leg 4 -B +B leg 5 -C +C left genital aperture. Male: -D +D habitus, dorsal -E +E genital somite and abdomen, ventral -F +F antennule -G +G third endopodal segment of leg 3. Scale bars: 0.05 mm ( -A, B, E +A, B, E ), 0.02 mm ( -C, F, G +C, F, G ), 0.1 mm ( -D +D ). - -Leg + +Leg 5 ( -Fig. 3B +Fig. 3B ) 3-segmented, consisting of coxa, basis and exopod; intercoxal sclerite small, narrow, with pointed outer distal corners and slightly concave distal margin. Coxa quadrate, unarmed, not articulated from somite. Basis also quadrate, armed with one pinnate seta outer distally. Exopod 54 -x +x 24 -μm +μm , 2.25 times as long as wide, armed with three spines (two distal and one outer) and one pinnate seta; medial margin spinulose and outer margin setulose. - + Leg 6 ( -Fig. 3C +Fig. 3C ) represented by one spinule and one naked seta on genital operculum. - -Description of male. - + +Description of male. + Body ( -Fig. 3D +Fig. 3D ) much narrower than that of female, 582 -μm +μm long. Prosome 314 -x +x 153 -μm +μm , approximately twice as long as wide. First pedigerous somite slightly narrower than cephalosome and second pedigerous somite. Urosome 6-segmented. Fifth pedigerous somite narrower than genital somite. Genital somite ( -Fig. 3E +Fig. 3E ) 86 -x +x 72 -μm +μm , longer than wide, with well-developed genital operculum. Four abdominal somites 25 -x +x 40, 23 -x +x 34, 20 -x +x 31, and 30 -x +x 28 -μm +μm , respectively. Caudal ramus 6.1 times as long as wide (61 -x +x 10 -μm +μm ); arrangement and locations of caudal setae as in female. - + Rostrum as in female. Antennule ( -Fig. 3F +Fig. 3F ) 17-segmented; armature formula (2 + aesthetasc)-(5 + aesthetasc)-4-2-(2 + aesthetasc)-2-2-2-2(2 + aesthetasc)-(1 + spine)-(2 + aesthetasc)-2-[3 + aesthetasc (or 2+aesthetasc)]-[0 (or 1)]-(1 + aesthetasc)-(9 + 2 aesthetascs); eleventh segment with short posterior margin and much longer anterior margin, spine on this segment slender. Antenna as in female. -Mandible and other mouth appendages as in female. - +Mandible and other mouth appendages as in female. + Legs 1, 2, and 4 also as in female. Leg 3 sexually dimorphic; third endopodal segment ( -Fig. 3G +Fig. 3G ) bearing two spines, three setae, and distally two small specialized elements, one curved, non-articulating, spinule-like element and one straight, distally bifurcate articulating element. - + Leg 5 as in female. Leg 6 ( -Fig. 3E +Fig. 3E ) represented by three naked setae on genital operculum, medial one smaller than other two. - -Etymology. - + +Etymology. + The specific name -thermophilus +thermophilus is a combination of Greek words -therm +therm (=heat) and -phil +phil (=loving), referring to the finding of the new species in a hydrothermal vent field. diff --git a/data/11/14/C0/1114C044D5CA5BD7B7CEFE5C8D2BAD11.xml b/data/11/14/C0/1114C044D5CA5BD7B7CEFE5C8D2BAD11.xml index 0f8f78aaef3..d51c25070b2 100644 --- a/data/11/14/C0/1114C044D5CA5BD7B7CEFE5C8D2BAD11.xml +++ b/data/11/14/C0/1114C044D5CA5BD7B7CEFE5C8D2BAD11.xml @@ -1,336 +1,336 @@ - - - -The earliest beetle † Coleopsis archaica (Insecta: Coleoptera) - morphological re-eva luation using Reflectance Transformation Imaging (RTI) and phylogenetic assessment + + + +The earliest beetle † Coleopsis archaica (Insecta: Coleoptera) - morphological re-eva luation using Reflectance Transformation Imaging (RTI) and phylogenetic assessment - - -Author + + +Author -Schaedel, Mario -https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7945-4205 -Institut fuer Evolution und Oekologie, University of Tuebingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany -mario.schaedel@gmail.com +Schaedel, Mario +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7945-4205 +Institut fuer Evolution und Oekologie, University of Tuebingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany +mario.schaedel@gmail.com - - -Author + + +Author -Yavorskaya, Margarita -Institut fuer Evolution und Oekologie, University of Tuebingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany +Yavorskaya, Margarita +Institut fuer Evolution und Oekologie, University of Tuebingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany - - -Author + + +Author -Beutel, Rolf -https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0433-7626 -Institut fuer Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung, Entomology Group, Friedrich Schiller University, Vor dem Neutor 1, 07743 Jena, Germany +Beutel, Rolf +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0433-7626 +Institut fuer Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung, Entomology Group, Friedrich Schiller University, Vor dem Neutor 1, 07743 Jena, Germany -text - - -Arthropod Systematics & amp; Phylogeny +text + + +Arthropod Systematics & amp; Phylogeny - -2022 - -2022-09-14 + +2022 + +2022-09-14 - -80 + +80 - -495 -510 + +495 +510 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.80.e86582 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.80.e86582 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.80.e86582 -1864-8312-80-495 -6D2B8B2207F74E618A21E40FEC328BEA -A45439E7701B5E17A4A71928F8A73A00 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.80.e86582 +1864-8312-80-495 +6D2B8B2207F74E618A21E40FEC328BEA +A45439E7701B5E17A4A71928F8A73A00 - - - - -Coleopsis archaica Ki rejtshuk, Poschmann and Nel, 2014 + + + + +Coleopsis archaica Ki rejtshuk, Poschmann and Nel, 2014 - - -? Coleoptera + + +? Coleoptera .? -Tshekardocoleidae -Poschmann and Schindler 2004 +Tshekardocoleidae +Poschmann and Schindler 2004 , p. 304, fig. 7 - -Tshekardocoleidae + +Tshekardocoleidae gen. et sp. indet. -Brauckmann 2007 +Brauckmann 2007 , p. 191, fig. 17 - -Coleopsis archaica + +Coleopsis archaica Kirejtshuk, Poschmann and Nel 2014 in Kirej-tshuk, Poschmann, Prokop, Gar rouste and Nel 2014, p. 6, figs.1,4 - -Coleopsis archaica + +Coleopsis archaica Kirejthuk and Nel 2016, p. 71, figs. 1-5 - -Coleopsis archaica + +Coleopsis archaica Kirejtshuk 2 020, p. 10, figs. 2 A-C - -Holotype (the only specimen). - + +Holotype (the only specimen). + ZfB 3315, Zentrum -fuer +fuer Biodokumentation, Schiffweiler, Germany. - -Redescription. - -General features + +Redescription. + +General features . The slender beetle is 7.8 mm long (inc luding mandibles and elytra) and reaches its maximum width of 2.5 mm slightly anterior to the posterior third of the body. The anterior part of the body with the prognathous head and the short and transverse prothorax is unusually short in relation to the remaining body (pterothorax + abdomen), which comprises ca. 80% of the total length. The elongate elytra reach beyond the abdominal apex (Fig. -1 +1 ). The dorsal surfaces of the head and the pronotum display a pattern of fine cuticular tubercles. - -Head capsule +Head capsule . The head is distinctly prognathous, about as broad as long, with rounded postocular temples and a short and moderately constricted neck region (Fig. -2A +2A ). Vestiges of dorsal ecdysial lines, the frontal and coronal sutures, are not recognizable. The head capsule is slightly narrowing anterior to the compound eyes. Dorsal protuberances (see -Beutel et al. 2008 +Beutel et al. 2008 ) are visible but rather inconspicuous (best visible in the black-and-white height maps; Fig. -2A, B +2A, B ). The compound eyes are large and strongly convex, strongly protruding laterally. Ocelli are not present. Antennal insertions, tentorial pits, maxillary grooves, and gular sutures are not visible. - -Labrum +Labrum . The labrum is well-developed, broad, with rounded anterolateral angles and lacking an anteromedian emargination. - -Antennae +Antennae . Not preserved. - - -Mandibles + +Mandibles . The mandibles are moderately sized, exposed laterad the labrum, laterally evenly curved, and distinctly protruding beyond the anterior labral edge, with a single visible apical tooth. - - -Maxillae + +Maxillae . The maxillary body is likely visible on the right side, posterolaterad the labrum (Fig. -2A +2A , -3A +3A ). A part of the maxillary palp is recognizable on both sides. - -Labium +Labium . A large plate-like structure, likely comprising the mentum and prementum, is visible. It has a laterally rounded anterior margin and a seemingly very distinct, straight hind margin (possibly congruent with the anterior margin of the frons). An indistinct, straight transverse suture is present on the anterior third. The labial palps and endite lobes are not visible. - -Prothorax +Prothorax . The transverse pronotum is more than three times as wide as its length along the midline. It is very slightly convex anteromedially and nearly straight posteriorly. Laterally it is strongly explanate, forming thin lateral duplicatures with a coarsely serrated margin. The anterolateral edges are distinctly projecting anteriorly. Posterolateral angles are indistinct or absent. The outlines of the small, rounded and medially separated procoxae are recognizable. A broad postcoxal bridge is obviously missing, suggesting posteriorly open procoxal cavities. The parallel--sided profemora are visible between the posterior pronotal margin and the concave anterolateral elytral edge. Other distal parts of the legs (e.g. pro-, meso- or metatibiae) (depicted in -Kirejtshuk et al. 2014 +Kirejtshuk et al. 2014 , fig. 1) are not recognizable. - -Mesothorax +Mesothorax . The large and exposed triangular scutellar shield is about as long as the pronotum. Ovoid and slightly oblique mesocoxae are indistinctly visible, slightly separated medially. Other parts of the mesothorax except for the elytra are not recognizable. - -Elytra +Elytra . The elytra are long and slender, comprising about 80% of the total body length, and nearly 5x as long as their maximum width. The shoulder region is distinctly retracted, almost to the level of the posterior edge of the scutellar shield, thus forming a distinct concavity of the anterior elytral edge. Broad explanate lateral flanges are present instead of typical inward folded epipleurae. They apparently cover the posterior body in a loose tent-like manner without forming a tightly sealed subelytral space. Posteriorly they distinctly reach beyond the abdominal apex. Several distinct longitudinal veins with a non-parallel-arrangement are present, comprising C along the lateral edge, a rather indistinct Sc which almost reaches the elytral apex, an equally long and distinct vein (either representing R or R+MA), a long CuA which traverses the elytra from the anterolateral region (almost at the anterior edge of R) almost to the elytral tip, and a single anal vein (A) about 1/3 as long as the elytron. All longitudinal veins are unbranched. Several shorter and rather indistinct longitudinal veins with unclear homology are present on the posterior 1/3, designated tentatively here as intercalary veins (secondary [or supplementary] longitudinal veins). Cross veins are missing. Window punctures are recognizable between CuA and A on the anterior 1/3 of the elytra but indistinct, arguably an artefact caused by the strong compression of the fossil. - -Metathorax +Metathorax . The indistinctly visible meso- and metacoxae indicate that the metathorax is slightly longer than the mesothorax, but the bord er between both segments is not recognizable. The metathorax appears almost parallel-sided, only slightly widening posteriorly as suggested by the position and outline of the coxae. The anapleural suture and the pleural elements are not recognizable, and a median discrimen, a transverse ridge and an exposed metatrochantin are also not visible. The indistinctly recognizable metacoxae are transverse. An indistinct oblique line, likely the posterolateral edge, tentatively suggests that the mesal metacoxal portion was distinctly projecting into the anterior abdomen. Metacoxal plates are not recognizable and are probably missing. A triangular metatrochanter with rounded edges is visible. Distal parts of the hind legs are not preserved. - -Hind wings +Hind wings . The rounded apical part of the membranous hind wings, clearly visible on the right body side (Fig. -1 +1 ), distinctly projects beyond the elytral apex. The exposed apical wing portion does not show any trace of folding or rolling, and no veins are visible on this region. - -Abdomen +Abdomen . The abdomen is evenly rounded laterally and tapering towards its sub-acuminate apex. It ends distinctly before the elytral apices. Individual sternites are not visible (in contrast to -Kirejtshuk et al. 2014 +Kirejtshuk et al. 2014 ). - - -Figure 1. + + +Figure 1. † - -Coleopsis archaica + +Coleopsis archaica , holotype, ZfB 3315, microscopic images, coaxial cross-polarised light, multi exposure bracketing. -A +A photograph of more complete side (part); -B +B less complete side (counterpart) virtually projected onto the part (the counterpart is mirrored); -C +C photograph of the counterpart. Abbreviations: -A +A , Analis (anal vein); -abd +abd , abdomen; -ce +ce , compound eye; -CuA +CuA , Cubitus anterior; -edt +edt , elytral distal tip; -elc +elc , elytral antero-proximal corner; -elf +elf , elytral flange; -elpm +elpm , elytral posterior margin; -hw +hw , hind wing; -iv +iv , intercalary veins; -leg1 +leg1 , foreleg; -pnlp +pnlp , lateral process of the pronotum; -pn +pn , pronotum. - - -Figure 2. + + +Figure 2. † - -Coleopsis archaica + +Coleopsis archaica , holotype, ZfB 3315. -A +A - -C +C microscopic images, coaxial cross-polarised light, multi exposure bracketing. -A +A detail of the head and prothorax region, part; -B +B detail of the head and prothorax region, counterpart; -C +C : detail of the left side of the mesothoracic region, part; -D +D - -G +G images derived from RTI imaging, the circular legends in the lower-left corners depict the convex half sphere used to calibrate the RTI setup under the same conditions as the images; -D +D normal map representation of the part; -E +E relative heights representation of the part; -F +F normal map representation of the counterpart. Abbreviations: -G +G relative heights representation of the counterpart. -ce +ce , compound eye; -elm +elm , elytral margin; -elc +elc , elytral antero-proximal corner; -leg1 +leg1 , foreleg; -md +md , mandible; -mxp +mxp , maxillary palp; -pnlp +pnlp , lateral process of the pronotum; -ve +ve , venter. - - -Figure 3. + + +Figure 3. † - -Coleopsis archaica + +Coleopsis archaica , holotype, ZfB 3315, drawings based on the photographs and the RTI images. -A +A more complete side (part); -B +B part and counterpart combined (counterpart mirrored); -C +C counterpart. Abbreviations: -A +A , Analis, anal vein; -abd +abd , abdomen; -C +C , Costa; -ce +ce , compound eye; -CuA +CuA , Cubitus anterior; -cx1 +cx1 - -3 +3 , coxa of thoracic segments 1-3; -edt +edt , elytral distal tip; -elc +elc , elytral antero-proximal corner; -elf +elf , elytral flange; -elpm +elpm , elytral posterior margin; -fr +fr , frons; -h +h , head; -hw +hw , hindwing; -iv +iv , intercalary veins; -lbr +lbr , labrum; -leg1 +leg1 , foreleg; -md +md , mandible; -mt +mt , mentum; -mx +mx , maxilla; -mxp +mxp , maxillary palp; -pmt +pmt , prementum; -pn +pn , pronotum; -pnlp +pnlp , lateral process of the pronotum; -R +R (+ -MA?) +MA?) , Radius, possibly conjoined with Media anterior; -Sc +Sc , Subcosta; -scs +scs , scutellar shield; -tr3 +tr3 , metatrochanter; -ve +ve , venter; -wp +wp , window punctures, exemplary, not limited to this area of the wing. - -Updated species diagnosis. -Body medium-sized (7.8 mm total length), slender. Head prognathous. Eyes strongly protruding laterally. Prothorax short. Pronotum more than three times as wide as its length along the midline, with anterolateral processes distinct, and lateral portions distinctly explanate with coarsely serrated margin. Procoxae small, rounded and medially separated. Dorsal surface of head and pronotum with fine tubercles. Scutellar shield triangular and large. Elytra reaching well beyond abdominal apex. Elytral shoulder region emarginated, with distinct concavity. Elytra with broad explanate lateral flanges. CuA oblique, from anterolateral region almost to the elytral tip; single anal vein (A) about 1/3 as long as the elytron. Window punctures visible between CuA and A. Mesocoxae ovoid and slightly oblique. Metathorax slightly longer than mesothorax. - + +Updated species diagnosis. +Body medium-sized (7.8 mm total length), slender. Head prognathous. Eyes strongly protruding laterally. Prothorax short. Pronotum more than three times as wide as its length along the midline, with anterolateral processes distinct, and lateral portions distinctly explanate with coarsely serrated margin. Procoxae small, rounded and medially separated. Dorsal surface of head and pronotum with fine tubercles. Scutellar shield triangular and large. Elytra reaching well beyond abdominal apex. Elytral shoulder region emarginated, with distinct concavity. Elytra with broad explanate lateral flanges. CuA oblique, from anterolateral region almost to the elytral tip; single anal vein (A) about 1/3 as long as the elytron. Window punctures visible between CuA and A. Mesocoxae ovoid and slightly oblique. Metathorax slightly longer than mesothorax. + This diagnosis is explicitly stated as a species-level diagnosis. Since † - -Coleopsis + +Coleopsis is monotypic, as are †Coleo-pseidae (and † -Coleopseoidea +Coleopseoidea Kirejthsuk and Nel 2016), the diagnosis should only be used to distinguish further specimens from † - -C. archaica + +C. archaica . It should not be arbitrarily split up into parts which then could lead future authors to include additional species into the (presently) monotypic taxonomic category, without providing an apomorphy-based argumentation or a phylogenetic analysis. diff --git a/data/12/15/93/121593C96CDB5644F976355E81216F39.xml b/data/12/15/93/121593C96CDB5644F976355E81216F39.xml index f575757eee4..cb9dcbe12a6 100644 --- a/data/12/15/93/121593C96CDB5644F976355E81216F39.xml +++ b/data/12/15/93/121593C96CDB5644F976355E81216F39.xml @@ -1,44 +1,44 @@ - - - -Order Macroscelidea + + + +Order Macroscelidea - - -Author + + +Author -Wilson, Don E. +Wilson, Don E. - - -Author + + +Author -Reeder, DeeAnn +Reeder, DeeAnn -text - - -2005 -The Johns Hopkins University Press - -Baltimore +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore - -Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 - - -82 -85 + + +82 +85 -book chapter -0-8018-8221-4 -10.5281/zenodo.7316519 +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 - + @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ - + [Macroscelides] brachyrhynchus A. Smith 1834 diff --git a/data/13/2E/10/132E100167875C1E81A5008BF05A1C63.xml b/data/13/2E/10/132E100167875C1E81A5008BF05A1C63.xml index 586207115c9..f8286fc0532 100644 --- a/data/13/2E/10/132E100167875C1E81A5008BF05A1C63.xml +++ b/data/13/2E/10/132E100167875C1E81A5008BF05A1C63.xml @@ -1,136 +1,136 @@ - - - -A new species of Pseudotrapelus (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) from Central Arabia + + + +A new species of Pseudotrapelus (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) from Central Arabia - - -Author + + +Author -Tamar, Karin -Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Maritim de la Barceloneta, Barcelona, Spain -karintmr@gmail.com +Tamar, Karin +Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Maritim de la Barceloneta, Barcelona, Spain +karintmr@gmail.com - - -Author + + +Author -Uvizl, Marek -Department of Zoology, National Museum, Cirkusova 1740, Prague, Czech Republic & Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, Prague, Czech Republic +Uvizl, Marek +Department of Zoology, National Museum, Cirkusova 1740, Prague, Czech Republic & Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, Prague, Czech Republic - - -Author + + +Author -Shobrak, Mohammed -https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-8289 -Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia +Shobrak, Mohammed +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-8289 +Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia - - -Author + + +Author -Almutairi, Mohammed -Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia +Almutairi, Mohammed +Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia - - -Author + + +Author -Busais, Salem -https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5785-9850 -Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, Aden University, Yemen +Busais, Salem +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5785-9850 +Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, Aden University, Yemen - - -Author + + +Author -Salim, Al Faqih Ali -Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia +Salim, Al Faqih Ali +Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia - - -Author + + +Author -AlGethami, Raed Hamoud M. -Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia +AlGethami, Raed Hamoud M. +Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia - - -Author + + +Author -AlGethami, Abdulaziz Raqi -Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia +AlGethami, Abdulaziz Raqi +Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia - - -Author + + +Author -Alanazi, Abdulkarim Saleh K. -Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia +Alanazi, Abdulkarim Saleh K. +Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia - - -Author + + +Author -Alsubaie, Saad Dasman -Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia +Alsubaie, Saad Dasman +Terrestrial wildlife conservation department, National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia - - -Author + + +Author -Chirio, Laurent -Lycee Saint-Exupery, B. P. 31, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo +Chirio, Laurent +Lycee Saint-Exupery, B. P. 31, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo - - -Author + + +Author -Carranza, Salvador -https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5378-3008 -Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Maritim de la Barceloneta, Barcelona, Spain +Carranza, Salvador +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5378-3008 +Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Maritim de la Barceloneta, Barcelona, Spain - - -Author + + +Author -Smid, Jiri -https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0309-209X -Department of Zoology, National Museum, Cirkusova 1740, Prague, Czech Republic & Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, Prague, Czech Republic +Smid, Jiri +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0309-209X +Department of Zoology, National Museum, Cirkusova 1740, Prague, Czech Republic & Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, Prague, Czech Republic -text - - -Vertebrate Zoology +text + + +Vertebrate Zoology - -2023 - -2023-11-14 + +2023 + +2023-11-14 - -73 + +73 - -1033 -1045 + +1033 +1045 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/vz.73.e110626 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/vz.73.e110626 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/vz.73.e110626 -2625-8498-73-1033 -0EC6023E18C140458BAF6CB4AD154FDA -F8D38E5DD87251389AB25E6751E4CF59 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/vz.73.e110626 +2625-8498-73-1033 +0EC6023E18C140458BAF6CB4AD154FDA +F8D38E5DD87251389AB25E6751E4CF59 - + -Pseudotrapelus tuwaiqensis +Pseudotrapelus tuwaiqensis sp. nov. @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ ( Pseduotrapelus [sic]) -Pseudotrapelus sinaita +Pseudotrapelus sinaita in Al-Sadoon (1988) @@ -161,18 +161,18 @@ in Al-Sadoon et al. (1991) -Pseudotrapelus sinaitus +Pseudotrapelus sinaitus in Kordges (1998) -Pseudotrapelus +Pseudotrapelus sp. in Tamar et al. (2019b) ' -Pseudotrapelus +Pseudotrapelus sp Riyadh' in @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ is derived from the geographic feature the species is associated with, the Tuwai Diagnosis. A - + Pseudotrapelus species forming a clade together with @@ -258,11 +258,11 @@ and Differential diagnosis. The genus - + Pseudotrapelus is mor-phologically very conservative, and it is virtually impossible to phenotypically distinguish one species from another without knowing precise locality data. - + Pseudotrapelus tuwaiqensis sp. nov. @@ -310,12 +310,12 @@ have these enlarged scales present, at least in some specimens. In line with the did not reveal any characters that would be unique for the species and allowed its unambiguous identification (Table 1 ). As a result, we advise caution and prudence when trying to key out -Pseudotrapelus +Pseudotrapelus specimens on the basis of morphology alone. With the currently available evidence, the safest and perhaps the only way to differentiate the individual -Pseudotrapelus +Pseudotrapelus species is either based on the origin of the specimens, or by using DNA barcoding. The ranges of most species are allopatric or parapatric, with P. tuwaiqensis @@ -348,18 +348,18 @@ and in northwestern Arabia; Fig. 1 ). The most reliable species identification tool in - + Pseudotrapelus is thus DNA barcoding. All presently recognized species have multiple specimens sequenced for three mitochondrial genes, including the COI marker that is the most commonly used barcode for animal identification ( Vences et al. 2012 ) and show marked genetic differentiation in all these markers across species (Appendix 4). - + Pseudotrapelus tuwaiqensis sp. nov. can be clearly differentiated from its congeners at the genetic level by p-distances of 6.3-8.6% in 16S, 15.3-19.8% in ND4, and 13.6-15.9% in COI (Appendix 4). In addition, all - + Pseudotrapelus species have been sequenced for two nuclear genes, of which the MC1R has unique alleles for each species and the c-mos has unique alleles for @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ sp. nov., (Fig. 3 ; Appendices 5, 6). - + Pseudotrapelus aqabensis , @@ -426,13 +426,13 @@ All specimens share the general coloration pattern (Figs Habitat and Distribution. - + Pseudotrapelus tuwaiqensis sp. nov. is a rock-dwelling species inhabiting rocky areas, outcrops, isolated rock mounds and even dry riverbeds with large boulders (Fig. 6 ). Like all other - + Pseudotrapelus species, it perches on top of stones and rocks during the day. Individuals were found sleeping at night tucked in rock crevices or laying on the ground in the open. diff --git a/data/5A/96/58/5A9658223F055671A90BD59088A40312.xml b/data/5A/96/58/5A9658223F055671A90BD59088A40312.xml index 05152fb1684..34d2632c049 100644 --- a/data/5A/96/58/5A9658223F055671A90BD59088A40312.xml +++ b/data/5A/96/58/5A9658223F055671A90BD59088A40312.xml @@ -1,529 +1,529 @@ - - - -First record of the false violin spider of the family Drymusidae (Araneae, Synspermiata, Scytodoidea) from Venezuela, with the description of a new species + + + +First record of the false violin spider of the family Drymusidae (Araneae, Synspermiata, Scytodoidea) from Venezuela, with the description of a new species - - -Author + + +Author -Villarreal, Osvaldo -https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5355-3723 -Departamento de Invertebrados - Laboratorio de Aracnologia, Campus de Ensino e Pesquisa do Museu Nacional - Predio Administrativo, Avenida Bartolomeu de Gusmao, 875, RJ, CEP 20941 - 160 Sao Cristovao, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil & Museo del Instituto de Zoologia Agricola, Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Av 19 de Abril c / c Av Casanova Godoy, Maracay, Aragua, Venezuela +Villarreal, Osvaldo +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5355-3723 +Departamento de Invertebrados - Laboratorio de Aracnologia, Campus de Ensino e Pesquisa do Museu Nacional - Predio Administrativo, Avenida Bartolomeu de Gusmao, 875, RJ, CEP 20941 - 160 Sao Cristovao, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil & Museo del Instituto de Zoologia Agricola, Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Av 19 de Abril c / c Av Casanova Godoy, Maracay, Aragua, Venezuela - - -Author + + +Author -Chame-Vazquez, David -https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3433-153X -Laboratorio de Aracnologia y Entomologia, Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas del Noroeste S. C., Instituto Politecnico Nacional 195, Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita Sur, CP. 23096, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico -chamevazquez@gmail.com +Chame-Vazquez, David +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3433-153X +Laboratorio de Aracnologia y Entomologia, Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas del Noroeste S. C., Instituto Politecnico Nacional 195, Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita Sur, CP. 23096, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico +chamevazquez@gmail.com -text - - -Zoosystematics and Evolution +text + + +Zoosystematics and Evolution - -2023 - -2023-03-29 + +2023 + +2023-03-29 - -99 + +99 - -1 + +1 - -273 -280 + +273 +280 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.99.99227 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.99.99227 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.99.99227 -1860-0743-1-273 -86213715F1FC4838BC478464DC0B9F4B -F3161813062A5D37A0C4DBE590620DF8 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.99.99227 +1860-0743-1-273 +86213715F1FC4838BC478464DC0B9F4B +F3161813062A5D37A0C4DBE590620DF8 - - - -Drymusa huberi -sp. nov. + + + +Drymusa huberi +sp. nov. - - -Figs 1-12 -, 13-20 -, 24 -, 49 -, 50 + + +Figs 1-12 +, 13-20 +, 24 +, 49 +, 50 - -Type data. - + +Type data. + Venezuela • ♀ -holotype +holotype : MIZA0105853; Yaracuy, La -Guaquira +Guaquira ; -10.2951°N +10.2951°N , -68.6535°W +68.6535°W ; 120 m a.s.l.; 16 Feb 2020; O. Villarreal, B.A. Huber, Q. Arias C. leg.; forest along stream • Paratype: 1 ♂ same data as the holotype. - - -Figures 1-12. - -Drymusa huberi + + +Figures 1-12. + +Drymusa huberi sp. nov., female holotype ( -1-4, 9, 11 +1-4, 9, 11 ) and male paratype ( -5-8, 10, 12 +5-8, 10, 12 ). -1, 5. +1, 5. Prosoma, dorsal view; -3, 7. +3, 7. Same, ventral view; -2, 6. +2, 6. Opisthosoma, dorsal view; -4, 8, 11 +4, 8, 11 Same, ventral view ( -11 +11 depilated); -9, 10. +9, 10. Prosoma, frontal view; -12. +12. Same, lateral view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm ( -1-12 +1-12 ). - - -Figures 13-20. - -Drymusa huberi + + +Figures 13-20. + +Drymusa huberi sp. nov. -13. +13. Female genitalia, ventral view; -14. +14. Same (cleared), dorsal view; -15. +15. Male palp, prolateral view; -16, 20. +16, 20. Same, ventral view ( -20 +20 cleared); -17. +17. Detail of vulva (cleared), dorsal view; -18. +18. Male palpal bulb, apical view; -19. +19. Same, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm ( -13-16, 18-20 +13-16, 18-20 ). Abbreviations: E-embolus, ep-epigastric plate, F-fundus, Fm-femur, Ho-hood of the post-epigastric plate, pp-post-epigastric plate, Pt-patella, S-spermathecae, Sd-Sperm duct, Ss-Spermatheca stalk, Ta-tarsus, Ti-tibia. - -Etymology. -The specific epithet is a name in apposition to honour the arachnologist Bernhard A. Huber in recognition of his prolific and excellent contributions to the taxonomy and systematics of the pholcid spiders of Venezuela and the world. Bernhard was also one of the collectors of the type specimens. + +Etymology. +The specific epithet is a name in apposition to honour the arachnologist Bernhard A. Huber in recognition of his prolific and excellent contributions to the taxonomy and systematics of the pholcid spiders of Venezuela and the world. Bernhard was also one of the collectors of the type specimens. - -Diagnosis. - + +Diagnosis. + The vulva of - -D. huberi + +D. huberi sp. nov. resembles those of - -D. canhemabae + +D. canhemabae Brescovit, Bonaldo & Rheims, 2004 and - -D. colligata + +D. colligata Bonaldo, Rheims & Brescovit, 2006 by the unbranched, long spermathecae (Figs -14 +14 , -17 +17 ). They differ by the spermathecae with a long stalk that is not coiled and the distal part globular (Figs -14 +14 , -17 +17 ), whereas - -D. canhemabae + +D. canhemabae has coiled spermathecae (see -Brescovit et al. (2004) +Brescovit et al. (2004) : fig. 5; Fig. -29 +29 ) and - -D. colligata + +D. colligata has shorter spermatheca, with its distal part swollen (not globular) (see -Bonaldo et al. (2006) +Bonaldo et al. (2006) : fig. 6; Fig. -30 +30 ). Females of - -D. huberi + +D. huberi sp. nov. also resemble those of - -D. dinora + +D. dinora Valerio, 1971 by the long and broad epigastric plate, but - -D. huberi + +D. huberi sp. nov. has a median hood on the post-epigastric plate, absent in - -D. dinora + +D. dinora (see -Valerio (1971) +Valerio (1971) : figs 8, 9; Fig. -20 +20 ), - -D. canhemabae + +D. canhemabae , and - -D. colligata + +D. colligata . Males of - -D. huberi + +D. huberi sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from all congeneric species by having the embolus shorter than the bulb length (Figs -15 +15 , -16 +16 , -18 +18 , -20 +20 ). - -Description. - - + +Description. + + Female (Holotype). -Habitus +Habitus . Carapace pear-shaped, pars cephalica elongated, with many long, procumbent setae (Figs -1 +1 , -9 +9 ). Opisthosoma elongated, with posterior two thirds attenuated and covered sparsely with long, brown setae (Fig. -2 +2 ). - -Colouration + +Colouration . Carapace yellowish, margins on pars thoracica tinged with purple-brown and a median broad V-shaped pattern; pars cephalica reticulated with purple-brown maculations (Fig. -1 +1 ). Chelicerae orange, with brownish maculations. Endites and labium purple-brown, the latter darker than the former. Sternum purple-brown, except on lateral margins, which are yellowish, with one darker spot on the posterior margin (arrow in Fig. -3 +3 ). Palp with femur and patella mostly yellowish, tinged with purple-brown on lateral sides; tibia and tarsus mostly purple-brown. -Legs +Legs : femora mostly purple-brown, with one basal and one distal yellowish ring; patellae mostly purple-brown; tibiae mostly yellowish, with one basal, thin purple-brown ring and one distal purple-brown ring; metatarsi and tarsi yellowish. Dorsum of prosoma grey-white with three W-shaped dark brown bands, posterior third mostly dark brown (Fig. -2 +2 ). Venter purple-brown, with pale-yellowish spots on the epigastric area (Fig. -4 +4 ). - -Female genitalia + +Female genitalia . Epigastric plate rectangular, large and about half the opisthosoma length (Figs -4 +4 , -11 +11 ); posterior corners are more sclerotised than the plate (arrow in Fig. -13 +13 ). Post-epigastric plate crescent-shaped, with a small median hood. Vulva with the distal part of spermatheca globular, on long, thin stalks, arising on lateral corners of the epigastric plate (Figs -14 +14 , -17 +17 ). Spermatheca with gland ductules well-spaced on the distal half (Fig. -17 +17 ). - -Measurements + +Measurements . Carapace 1.32 long, 1.02 wide; eye diameters: PME 0.10, ALE 0.09, PLE 0.06; labium 0.30 long, 0.30 wide; sternum 0.69 long, 0.65 wide. Legs: I 10.8 (2.82, 0.36, 2.97, 3.06, 0.87), II 8.76 (2.46, 0.34, 2.49, 2.65, 0.82), III 6.87 (1.95, 0.39, 1.74, 2.04, 0.75), IV 8.59 (2.35, 0.33, 2.43, 2.61, 0.87). Leg formula: 1243. - - -Figures 21-32. - -Drymusa + + +Figures 21-32. + +Drymusa spp., females. -21. - -D. simoni +21. + +D. simoni , posterior part of opisthosoma, lateral view; -22. - -D. dinora +22. + +D. dinora , opisthosoma, ventral view; -23, 25-27. +23, 25-27. Female genitalia, ventral view ( -23. - -D. colligata +23. + +D. colligata ; -25. - -D. spectata +25. + +D. spectata ; -26. - -D. armasi +26. + +D. armasi ; -27. - -D. serrana +27. + +D. serrana ); -24, 28-32. +24, 28-32. Same, dorsal view ( -24. - -D. huberi +24. + +D. huberi sp. nov.; -28. - -D. serrana +28. + +D. serrana ; -29. - -D. canhemabae +29. + +D. canhemabae ; -30. - -D. colligata +30. + +D. colligata ; -31. - -D. rengan +31. + +D. rengan ; -32. - -D. spelunca +32. + +D. spelunca ). - - -Figures 33-48. - -Drymusa + + +Figures 33-48. + +Drymusa spp., male palp ( -33, 34. - -D. rengan +33, 34. + +D. rengan ; -35, 36. - -D. serrana +35, 36. + +D. serrana ; -37, 38. - -D. spelunca +37, 38. + +D. spelunca ; -39. - -D. dinora +39. + +D. dinora ; -40. - -D. armasi +40. + +D. armasi ; -41. - -D. spectata +41. + +D. spectata ; -42. - -D. tobyi +42. + +D. tobyi ; -43. - -D. canhemabae +43. + +D. canhemabae ; -44, 45. - -D. colligata +44, 45. + +D. colligata ; -46, 47. - -D. philomatica +46, 47. + +D. philomatica ; -48. - -D. simoni +48. + +D. simoni ). -33, 35, 37, 40, 41, 44, 46, 48. +33, 35, 37, 40, 41, 44, 46, 48. Palp, prolateral view; -34, 36, 38, 39, 42, 43, 45, 47. +34, 36, 38, 39, 42, 43, 45, 47. Palp, retrolateral view. - - -Figures 49-53. -49, 50. - -Drymusa huberi + + +Figures 49-53. +49, 50. + +Drymusa huberi sp. nov. live specimens from La -Guaquira +Guaquira , Yaracuy State, Venezuela. -49. +49. Male, paratype; -50. +50. Female, holotype; -51. +51. Habitat, tropical dry forest in La -Guaquira +Guaquira , Yaracuy State; -52. +52. Leaf litter on the forest floor, microhabitat of the species; -53. +53. Known distribution of all species of the genus - -Drymusa + +Drymusa . Photo credit: O. Villarreal: -49, 50, 51 +49, 50, 51 ; D. Romero: -52 +52 . - -Male (paratype). + +Male (paratype). Habitus as the female (Figs -5-8 +5-8 , -10 +10 , -12 +12 ), except pars cephalic with few short setae, mostly on clypeal area, opisthosoma with posterior third attenuated. - -Colouration + +Colouration . As the female, but the purple-brown median pattern and lateral margins are narrower; the sternum maculation is light purple; palp yellowish with scattered purple-brown maculations, tarsus darker than other segments. Dorsum of opisthosoma with transversal bands narrower, elongated, fused with the next one; venter yellowish, except posterior third, which is light purple. - -Palp + +Palp . Sub-cylindrical femur longer than tibia; tibia slightly more thickened than femur and slightly swollen at mid-length (Figs -15 +15 , -16 +16 , -20 +20 ). Bulb subspherical, slightly longer than wide (Figs -15 +15 , -16 +16 , -18 +18 ). Embolus spiniform, curved, directed ventral-retrolaterally and relatively short, about half the length of bulb (Figs -18 +18 , -19 +19 ). - -Measurements + +Measurements . Carapace 1.26 long, 1.05 wide; eye diameters: PME 0.12, ALE 0.09, PLE 0.07; labium 0.24 long, 0.27 wide; sternum 0.72 long, 0.72 wide. Legs: I missing, II 10.62 (2.97, 0.39, 3.09, 3.24, 0.93), III 7.77 (2.13, 0.36, 2.04, 2.40, 0.84), IV 10.20 (2.82, 0.36, 2.82, 3.09, 0.93). Leg formula: (1)243. - -Distribution. - + +Distribution. + Only known from the type locality. See Fig. -53 +53 for the known distribution of all - -Drymusa + +Drymusa species. - -Natural history. - + +Natural history. + Both specimens were found in the leaf litter in a tropical dry forest along a streambed (Figs -51 +51 , -52 +52 ); this species shares the microhabitat with - -Ochyrocera + +Ochyrocera sp. ( -Ochyroceratidae +Ochyroceratidae ). For live specimens of - -D. huberi + +D. huberi sp. nov., see Figs -49 +49 , -50 +50 . diff --git a/data/5D/4B/0D/5D4B0D34AD7E48DD9DDF3F6AD0F3A5B1.xml b/data/5D/4B/0D/5D4B0D34AD7E48DD9DDF3F6AD0F3A5B1.xml index 57bf7f1e855..f4174e8d8ac 100644 --- a/data/5D/4B/0D/5D4B0D34AD7E48DD9DDF3F6AD0F3A5B1.xml +++ b/data/5D/4B/0D/5D4B0D34AD7E48DD9DDF3F6AD0F3A5B1.xml @@ -1,128 +1,128 @@ - - - -Description of Barathricola thermophilus, a new species from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent field in the Indian Ocean with redescription of the Barathricola type species (Crustacea, Copepoda, Cyclopoida) + + + +Description of Barathricola thermophilus, a new species from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent field in the Indian Ocean with redescription of the Barathricola type species (Crustacea, Copepoda, Cyclopoida) - - -Author + + +Author -Ivanenko, Viatcheslav N. +Ivanenko, Viatcheslav N. - - -Author + + +Author -Lee, Jimin +Lee, Jimin - - -Author + + +Author -Chang, Cheon Young +Chang, Cheon Young - - -Author + + +Author -Kim, Il-Hoi +Kim, Il-Hoi -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2019 - -865 + +2019 + +865 - -103 -121 + +103 +121 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.865.35827 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.865.35827 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.865.35827 -1313-2970-865-103 -9A0189C5540B4BF987C224EB5B74D5A1 -B1BB06918E85591FB716530C19A4B2BF +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.865.35827 +1313-2970-865-103 +9A0189C5540B4BF987C224EB5B74D5A1 +B1BB06918E85591FB716530C19A4B2BF - - - + + + Genus -Barathricola Humes, 1999 +Barathricola Humes, 1999 - -Amended diagnosis. - -Cyclopoida + +Amended diagnosis. + +Cyclopoida . Prosome slender, 5-segmented. Urosome 5-segmented in female, 6-segmented in male, first somite with leg 5. Caudal rami elongate, bearing six or seven setae. Antennule 14-segmented in female and 17-segmented in male; geniculation of male antennules between segments 15 and 16. Antenna 4-segmented, without exopod; armature formula 0-1-5-7. Mandible palp biramous, with elongate basis; endopod 2-segmented, first segment with two, second segment with four setae; exopod small, indistinctly 2-3-segmented, with two terminal setae. Maxillulary coxal endite absent. Maxilla with praecoxa, coxa, basis, and 3-segmented endopod armed with four, two and four setae, respectively. Maxilliped 7-segmented, with syncoxa bearing three (1+2) setae, basis with two setae and 5-segmented endopod with setal formula 1, 1, 1, 1, 3. Legs 1-4 biramous, with 3-segmented rami; armature formula as in Table 1. Leg 1: inner margin of basis bearing long flattened setules. Third endopodal segment of leg 3 with three spines and three setae (1,II,I+2); in male with small outer terminal spine near spine-like outgrowth. Middle endopodal segment of leg 4 with distal inner seta modified into spine. Leg 5 consisting of coxa, basis, and exopod, with intercoxal sclerite; endopod absent; setal formula -0; 1-0; I, I+1+I in female and 0-0; 1-0; I, I+1+I or 0-0; 1-0; I, I+1+I, 1 in male. - - + + Table 1. Spine and setal formulae of legs 1-4 in - -Barathricola rimensis + +Barathricola rimensis Humes, 1999. Roman numerals indicate spines, and Arabic numerals setae. - - - - - - - - + +
-CoxaBasisEndopodExopod
+ + + + + + - - - - - - + + + + + + - - - - - - + + + + + + - - - - - - + + + + + + - - - - - - + + + + + +
-CoxaBasisEndopodExopod
Leg 10-11-I0-1;0-1;1,2,3I-0;I-1;III,I,4
Leg 10-11-I0-1;0-1;1,2,3I-0;I-1;III,I,4
Leg 20-11-00-1;0-2;1,2,3I-0;I-1;III,I,5
Leg 20-11-00-1;0-2;1,2,3I-0;I-1;III,I,5
Leg 30-11-00-1;0-2;1,II,I+2I-0;I-1;III,I,5
Leg 30-11-00-1;0-2;1,II,I+2I-0;I-1;III,I,5
Leg 40-11-00-1;0-1+I;I,II,III-0;I-1;II,I,5
Leg 40-11-00-1;0-1+I;I,II,III-0;I-1;II,I,5
- -Type species. - - -Barathricola rimensis + +Type species. + + +Barathricola rimensis Humes, 1999. - -Barathricola thermophilus + +Barathricola thermophilus sp.nov. is the second species of this genus. diff --git a/data/63/F3/80/63F380D3F9A08285570A1AC9751CAA74.xml b/data/63/F3/80/63F380D3F9A08285570A1AC9751CAA74.xml index c956e2c2499..5e71df4e831 100644 --- a/data/63/F3/80/63F380D3F9A08285570A1AC9751CAA74.xml +++ b/data/63/F3/80/63F380D3F9A08285570A1AC9751CAA74.xml @@ -1,44 +1,44 @@ - - - -Order Macroscelidea + + + +Order Macroscelidea - - -Author + + +Author -Wilson, Don E. +Wilson, Don E. - - -Author + + +Author -Reeder, DeeAnn +Reeder, DeeAnn -text - - -2005 -The Johns Hopkins University Press - -Baltimore +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore - -Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 - - -82 -85 + + +82 +85 -book chapter -0-8018-8221-4 -10.5281/zenodo.7316519 +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 - + @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ - + [Macroscelides] rufescens Peters 1878 diff --git a/data/66/93/8C/66938C116CFD45DA8590917140E0B2D7.xml b/data/66/93/8C/66938C116CFD45DA8590917140E0B2D7.xml index 64e16bf19bb..7eecf60ca1a 100644 --- a/data/66/93/8C/66938C116CFD45DA8590917140E0B2D7.xml +++ b/data/66/93/8C/66938C116CFD45DA8590917140E0B2D7.xml @@ -1,770 +1,770 @@ - - - -Description of Barathricola thermophilus, a new species from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent field in the Indian Ocean with redescription of the Barathricola type species (Crustacea, Copepoda, Cyclopoida) + + + +Description of Barathricola thermophilus, a new species from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent field in the Indian Ocean with redescription of the Barathricola type species (Crustacea, Copepoda, Cyclopoida) - - -Author + + +Author -Ivanenko, Viatcheslav N. +Ivanenko, Viatcheslav N. - - -Author + + +Author -Lee, Jimin +Lee, Jimin - - -Author + + +Author -Chang, Cheon Young +Chang, Cheon Young - - -Author + + +Author -Kim, Il-Hoi +Kim, Il-Hoi -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2019 - -865 + +2019 + +865 - -103 -121 + +103 +121 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.865.35827 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.865.35827 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.865.35827 -1313-2970-865-103 -9A0189C5540B4BF987C224EB5B74D5A1 -B1BB06918E85591FB716530C19A4B2BF +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.865.35827 +1313-2970-865-103 +9A0189C5540B4BF987C224EB5B74D5A1 +B1BB06918E85591FB716530C19A4B2BF - - - -Barathricola rimensis Humes, 1999 -Figs 4 + + + +Barathricola rimensis Humes, 1999 +Figs 4 , -5 +5 , -6 +6 , -7 +7 - - -Material + + +Material . - + Females and males from the type locality dissected by A.G. Humes and marked as - -Barathricola rimensis + +Barathricola rimensis in the Zoological Museum of Lomonosov Moscow State University (collection numbers: w.cyc.sch.1.1-1.5). The hydrothermal vent field is at Juan de Fuca Ridge ( -44°08.6'N +44°08.6'N , -129°42'W +129°42'W ) in the northeastern Pacific, 26 August 1996 at 2254 m depth. - -Redescription of female. - + +Redescription of female. + Body as in original description. Differs from - -Barathricola thermophilus + +Barathricola thermophilus sp. nov. in following features. - + Caudal ramus ( -Fig. 4D +Fig. 4D ) elongate, 99 -x +x 9 mm, ratio of length to width 11:1. Outer lateral seta located approximately at junction of first and second thirds of ramus. Dor -sal +sal seta short. Outermost terminal seta also short, placed dorsally. Innermost terminal seta short. All these setae smooth. Two long median terminal setae 117 mm (outer) and 234 mm (inner), both with lateral setules. Few minute spinules at distal outer corner of ramus. - - + + Figure 4. - -Barathricola rimensis + +Barathricola rimensis Humes, 1999: -A +A antennule of female -B +B antennule of male, distal segments 8-17 -C +C antennule of male, proximal segments 1-12 -D +D caudal ramus of female -E +E caudal ramus of male. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. - + Antennule ( -Fig. 4A +Fig. 4A ) 14-segmented with numerous subdivisions. Armature formula: 3-8-8-5-3-0-1-0-1-(2 + aesthetasc)-(2 + aesthetasc)-(2 + aesthetasc)-(6 + aesthetasc). - + Antenna ( -Fig. 5A +Fig. 5A ) four-segmented, with coxa, basis, and two-segmented endopod, armed with 0, 1, 5, and 7 setae. Exopod absent. Length 122 mm without setae. - - + + Figure 5. - -Barathricola rimensis + +Barathricola rimensis Humes, 1999, female: -A +A antenna -B +B mandible -C +C distal part of the mandibular gnathobase. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. - + Mandible ( -Fig. 5B, C +Fig. 5B, C ) with coxa having medially directed gnathobase armed distally with row of seven or eight slender teeth. Palp biramous. Basis elongate, with minute exopodal process carrying two long setae, and two prominent setae distally on margin of basis; endopod two-segmented, first segment small, trapezoidal, bearing two setae and row of minute spinules, second segment small with four distal setae and row of minute spinules along anterior edge. - + Maxillule ( -Fig. 6A +Fig. 6A ) with large praecoxa bearing arthrite with eight setae; coxa-basis with 3+1 setae; exopod with two short stout setae and two long slender setae; endopod with five setae. - - + + Figure 6. - -Barathricola rimensis + +Barathricola rimensis Humes, 1999, female: -A +A maxillule -B +B maxilla -C +C maxilliped. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. - + Maxilla ( -Fig. 6B +Fig. 6B ) with praecoxa having two endites, proximal endite bearing four setae, distal endite represented by single seta. Coxa with two endites, both with three setae. Basis with endite bearing three setae, one short, one long and slender, and one stout and claw-like, and having few minute subterminal spinules. Endopod three-segmented, with first segment having two endites with two setae each, small second segment bearing two setae, and minute third segment with four setae. - + Maxilliped ( -Fig. 6C +Fig. 6C ) with both coxa and basis swollen medially and bearing three and two setae, respectively; endopod slender, consisting of five segments armed with 1, 1, 1, 1, and 3 setae. Coxae of maxillipeds joined ventrally by one sclerotized line. - + Legs 1-4 ( -Fig. 7A, C, E +Fig. 7A, C, E ) biramous with three-segmented rami; armature formula for legs 1-4 as in Table 1. Leg 1 ( -Fig. 7A +Fig. 7A ), inner side of basis with barbed spine and row of eight slender curved setules. Leg 3 ( -Fig. 7C +Fig. 7C ) with 2 distal spines on third endopodal segment. - - + + Figure 7. - -Barathricola rimensis + +Barathricola rimensis Humes, 1999: -A +A leg 1 of female, inner part of protopod -B +B leg 1 of male, inner part of protopod -C +C leg 3 of female, distal endopodal segment, posterior -D +D leg 3 of male, distal endopodal segment, anterior -E +E leg 4 of female, endopod, anterior -F +F leg 5 of female, exopod, anterior -G +G leg 5 of male, distal segment. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. - + Leg 5 ( -Fig. 7F +Fig. 7F ). Both legs connected by small quadrangular intercoxal sclerite and consisting of coxa, basis, and one-segmented exopod. Coxa and basis with setules along both sides. Basis with outer seta 44 mm long. Exopod 21 mm in greatest dimensions (15.5 mm wide distally) bearing three spines and one seta. Outer marginal barbed spine 57 mm, two terminal spines 58 mm (outer) and 41 mm (inner), both with minute outer spinules and longer inner fringelike setules. Seta between these two spines smooth, 55 mm. Outer margin of segment proximal to spine with setules; distal to spine and along inner side of segment with shorter setules, inner margin with minute spinules. - -Redescription of male. - + +Redescription of male. + Differs from - -Barathricola thermophilus + +Barathricola thermophilus sp. nov. in following features: - + Caudal ramus ( -Fig. 4E +Fig. 4E ) resembling that of female but shorter, ratio 8.5:1. Antennule ( -Fig. 4B, C +Fig. 4B, C ) 17-segmented; armature formula (2 + aesthetasc)-(5 + aesthetasc)-4-2-(2 + aesthetasc)-2-2-2-2(2 + aesthetasc)-(1 + spine)-(2 + aesthetasc)-2-[3 -+ ++ aesthetasc (or 2+aesthetasc)]-[0 (or 1)]-(1 + aesthetasc)-(9 + 2 aesthetascs); eleventh segment with short posterior margin and much longer anterior margin, spine on this segment slender. Legs 1 ( -Fig. 7B +Fig. 7B ) inner side of basis with barbed spine and row of eight slender curved setules. Leg 3 sexually dimorphic; third endopodal segment ( -Fig. 7D +Fig. 7D ) bearing two spines, three setae, and distally two small specialized elements, one curved, non-articulating, spine-like element and one straight element. Leg 5 ( -Fig. 7G +Fig. 7G ) different from that of female in having additional seta on inner margin of exopod (armature formula 0-0; 1-0; I, I+1+I, 1). - -Remarks. - - -Martinez + +Remarks. + + +Martinez Arbizu (2006) established the family -Schminkepinellidae +Schminkepinellidae into which he incorporated five genera, - -Cyclopinella + +Cyclopinella , - -Muceddina + +Muceddina , - -Barathricola + +Barathricola , and his two new genera - -Einslepinella + +Einslepinella and - -Schminkepinella + +Schminkepinella . The family is a monophyletic group of genera distinguished from other cyclopoid families by the reduction of a maxillulary coxal endite and the transformation of the distal inner seta on the middle endopodal segment of leg 3 into a spine ( - -Martinez + +Martinez Arbizu 2006 ). None of the synapomorphies for the order -Cyclopoida +Cyclopoida (a brush-like seta on the exopod of mandible, a brush-like seta on the exopod of maxillule, one or more flange-like setae on the endopod of swimming leg 4, pores with sensory dendrites laterally on the male cephalosome) proposed by -Abiahy et al. (2006) +Abiahy et al. (2006) are found in -Schminkepinellidae +Schminkepinellidae . -Karanovic (2008) +Karanovic (2008) described - -Cyclopinella tincanbayensis + +Cyclopinella tincanbayensis as a new species and synonymized two monotypic genera - -Muceddina + +Muceddina and - -Barathricola + +Barathricola with - -Cyclopinella + +Cyclopinella and included these genera within -Cyclopinidae +Cyclopinidae based on the two major characters as synapomorphic shared by these nominal genera and - -Cyclopinella + +Cyclopinella : the third endopodal segment of leg 4 with all armature elements transformed into spines and the three-segmented female leg 5 with an uniform armature and the elongate exopod. -Karanovic (2008) +Karanovic (2008) recognized the mandibular palp as the most important morphological character differentiating species of - -Cyclopinella + +Cyclopinella and its reduced segmentation and setation is consistent with reductions in other cephalic appendages and in the maxilliped. Our re-examination of the type species of the genus - -Muceddina + +Muceddina , confirmed the original description and did not reveal the presence of a sexually dimorphic leg 3. This as well as our re-examination of the type specimens of - -Barathricola rimensis + +Barathricola rimensis does not provide sufficient support for inclusion of - -Muceddina multispinosa + +Muceddina multispinosa and - -Barathricola rimensis + +Barathricola rimensis in - -Cyclopinella + +Cyclopinella . Additional data are needed to provide for the proposed taxonomic changes; here - -Barathricola + +Barathricola and - -Muceddina + +Muceddina are considered valid genera with clear distinctive characters separating them from other genera (see Key and Table 2). - -Cyclopinella tincanbayensis + +Cyclopinella tincanbayensis should remain in - -Cyclopinella + +Cyclopinella although its distinctive characters may be significant enough to consider moving it to a new genus after revision. - -Barathricola + +Barathricola , - -Cyclopinella + +Cyclopinella , and - -Muceddina + +Muceddina should remain in the -Schminkepinellidae +Schminkepinellidae as was proposed by - -Martinez + +Martinez Arbizu (2006) until more data are available. - - + + Table 2. Morphological differences, distributions and habitats among species of the -Schminkepinellidae +Schminkepinellidae . - - - - -
Characters\ Species - -Muceddina multispinosa + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - -
Characters\ Species + +Muceddina multispinosa - -Cycliinella tincanbayensis + + +Cycliinella tincanbayensis - -C. tumidula + + +C. tumidula - -Barathricola rimensis + + +Barathricola rimensis - -B. thermophilus + + +B. thermophilus sp. nov. - -Einslepinella ulrichi + + +Einslepinella ulrichi - -E. mediana + + +E. mediana - -E. alignatha + + +E. alignatha - -Schminkepinella plumifera + + +Schminkepinella plumifera
♀ Caudal ramus, L/W ratio7.64.0about 411.08.98-815.5
♀ Caudal ramus, L/W ratio7.64.0about 411.08.98-815.5
Segments of ♀ antennule15151214147888
Segments of ♀ antennule15151214147888
Armature of antenna1-1-5-71-1-5-60-1-4-70-1-5-70-1-5-70-1-1-50-1-1-60-1-1-61-9
Armature of antenna1-1-5-71-1-5-60-1-4-70-1-5-70-1-5-70-1-1-50-1-1-60-1-1-61-9
Inner seta on basis of mandiblePresentPresentPresentAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsentPresentAbsent
Inner seta on basis of mandiblePresentPresentPresentAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsentPresentAbsent
Armature of mandibular exopod1-1-1-21-1-21 seta0-0-20-0-21-1-11-21-1-12
Armature of mandibular exopod1-1-1-21-1-21 seta0-0-20-0-21-1-11-21-1-12
Armature of mandibular endopod3-52-442-42-45444
Armature of mandibular endopod3-52-442-42-45444
Setae on maxillular basis4?3444--3
Setae on maxillular basis4?3444--3
Setae on maxillular exopod443444--4
Setae on maxillular exopod443444--4
Setae on maxillular endopod6?555---4
Setae on maxillular endopod6?555---4
Setae on maxilliped segments5-2-1-1-1-1-44-2-1-1-1-1-43-2-1-1-33-2-1-1-1-1-33-2-1-1-1-1-30-0-0-1+spine0-0-0-111-1
Setae on maxilliped segments5-2-1-1-1-1-44-2-1-1-1-1-43-2-1-1-33-2-1-1-1-1-33-2-1-1-1-1-30-0-0-1+spine0-0-0-111-1
Outer element of 3rd endopodal segment of leg 1SetaSetaSpineSetaSetaSpineSpineSpineNone
Outer element of 3rd endopodal segment of leg 1SetaSetaSpineSetaSetaSpineSpineSpineNone
Armature of 3rd endopodal segment of leg 33 spines + 3 setae2 spines + 4 setae2 spines + 4 setae3 spines + 3 setae3 spines + 3 setae4 spines + 2 setae4 spines + 2 setae-2 spines + 2 setae
Armature of 3rd endopodal segment of leg 33 spines + 3 setae2 spines + 4 setae2 spines + 4 setae3 spines + 3 setae3 spines + 3 setae4 spines + 2 setae4 spines + 2 setae-2 spines + 2 setae
Spines on 3rd exopodal segment of leg 34344444-4
Spines on 3rd exopodal segment of leg 34344444-4
Armature on 2nd endopodal segment of leg 41 spine + 1 seta2 setae2 setae1 spine + 1 seta1 spine + 1 seta1 spine + 1 seta1 spine + 1 seta-1 spine + 1 seta
Armature on 2nd endopodal segment of leg 41 spine + 1 seta2 setae2 setae1 spine + 1 seta1 spine + 1 seta1 spine + 1 seta1 spine + 1 seta-1 spine + 1 seta
Armature of exopod of ♀ leg 5I, I+1+III, 1+II, I+1+II, I+1+II, I+1+II, I+1+II, I+1+II, I+1+I1+1+I
Armature of exopod of ♀ leg 5I, I+1+III, 1+II, I+1+II, I+1+II, I+1+II, I+1+II, I+1+II, I+1+I1+1+I
Armature of exopod of ♂ leg 5I-1; I+1+I, 1UnknownAs in femaleI, I+1+I, 1As in femaleI-1; I+1+IUnknownUnknownI, I+1+I, 1
Armature of exopod of ♂ leg 5I-1; I+1+I, 1UnknownAs in femaleI, I+1+I, 1As in femaleI-1; I+1+IUnknownUnknownI, I+1+I, 1
Distributions (habitats)Mediterranean & Atlantic (anchihaline caves)Australia (littoral, interstitial)Norway (shallow water)Northeast Pacific (hydrothermal vent area)Indian Ocean (hydrothermal vent area)Arctic (depth 8-529 m)Arctic (depth 156-449 m)Arctic (depth 256 m)Arctic (depth 3211 m)
Distributions (habitats)Mediterranean & Atlantic (anchihaline caves)Australia (littoral, interstitial)Norway (shallow water)Northeast Pacific (hydrothermal vent area)Indian Ocean (hydrothermal vent area)Arctic (depth 8-529 m)Arctic (depth 156-449 m)Arctic (depth 256 m)Arctic (depth 3211 m)
ReferencesJaume & Boxshall, 1996Karanovic, 2008Sars, 1913Humes, 1998 and this paperThis paper - -Martinez +
ReferencesJaume & Boxshall, 1996Karanovic, 2008Sars, 1913Humes, 1998 and this paperThis paper + +Martinez Arbizu 2006 - -Martinez + + +Martinez Arbizu 2006 - -Martinez + + +Martinez Arbizu 2006 - -Martinez + + +Martinez Arbizu 2006
- + Data here show that the sexual dimorphism in leg 3 occurs in - -B. thermophilus + +B. thermophilus and - -B. rimensis + +B. rimensis . Thus, the sexually dimorphic leg 3 known from the two species living in the hydrothermal vent environment is clearly the derived character of the genus - -Barathricola + +Barathricola as mentioned by - -Martinez + +Martinez Arbizu (2006) . - -Barathricola thermophilus + +Barathricola thermophilus sp. -nov +nov . shares with - -B. rimensis + +B. rimensis the shape of the mandibular palp and a number of other characters, e.g., -Humes (1999) +Humes (1999) described the mandibular exopod of - -B. rimensis + +B. rimensis as "a minute process carrying two long setae", but his illustrations and those here for this appendage show that the exopod is indistinctly 3-segmented, with two setae on the third segment, as in - -B. thermophilus + +B. thermophilus sp. nov. In addition, the two species share the identical armature formula for the antenna (0-1-5-7), the loss of an inner seta on the basis of the -mandible +mandible , a two-segmented mandibular endopod bearing two and four setae on the first and second segments, respectively, and elongate caudal rami. - + Although the two species of - -Barathricola + +Barathricola are very similar to each other, they cannot be treated as conspecific due to a significant difference in leg 5 of the male. The exopod (terminal segment) of leg 5 is armed with three spines and two setae (formula I, I+1+I, 1) in - -B. rimensis + +B. rimensis , in contrast to three spines and one seta (formula I, I+1+I) in - -B. thermophilus + +B. thermophilus sp. nov. lacking a seta on the inner margin of the exopod. Within the -Schminkepinellidae +Schminkepinellidae males of six species are known, including - -B. rimensis + +B. rimensis and - -B. thermophilus + +B. thermophilus sp. nov. In these species a sexual dimorphic leg 5, as in - -B. rimensis + +B. rimensis , is known in - -Muceddina multispinosa + +Muceddina multispinosa , - -Schminkepinella plumifera + +Schminkepinella plumifera , and - -Einslepinella ulrichi + +Einslepinella ulrichi . However, -Sars (1913) +Sars (1913) recorded that leg 5 of male - -Cyclopinella tumidula + +Cyclopinella tumidula is of exactly the same appearance as in the female. Thus, the sexual dimorphism in leg 5 appears to be a character differentiating species, but not genera, in the -Schminkepinellidae +Schminkepinellidae . An additional morphological difference between the two species of - -Barathricola + +Barathricola is the ratio of the length to the width of the caudal ramus is 11.0:1 in the female and 8.5:1 in the male of - -B. rimensis + +B. rimensis , which is 8.9:1 in the female and 6.1:1 in the male of - -B. thermophilus + +B. thermophilus sp. nov. diff --git a/data/73/3A/D1/733AD1B2D30DD28357525BA646EB279D.xml b/data/73/3A/D1/733AD1B2D30DD28357525BA646EB279D.xml index 1850e3a2c92..2267ed2ef66 100644 --- a/data/73/3A/D1/733AD1B2D30DD28357525BA646EB279D.xml +++ b/data/73/3A/D1/733AD1B2D30DD28357525BA646EB279D.xml @@ -1,44 +1,44 @@ - - - -Order Macroscelidea + + + +Order Macroscelidea - - -Author + + +Author -Wilson, Don E. +Wilson, Don E. - - -Author + + +Author -Reeder, DeeAnn +Reeder, DeeAnn -text - - -2005 -The Johns Hopkins University Press - -Baltimore +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore - -Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 - - -82 -85 + + +82 +85 -book chapter -0-8018-8221-4 -10.5281/zenodo.7316519 +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 - + @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ - + [Macroscelides] rupestris A. Smith 1831 diff --git a/data/76/05/E9/7605E93176C231E38E76FF42BFEBB77E.xml b/data/76/05/E9/7605E93176C231E38E76FF42BFEBB77E.xml index 766da23fcd2..07347fb0cb4 100644 --- a/data/76/05/E9/7605E93176C231E38E76FF42BFEBB77E.xml +++ b/data/76/05/E9/7605E93176C231E38E76FF42BFEBB77E.xml @@ -1,44 +1,44 @@ - - - -Order Macroscelidea + + + +Order Macroscelidea - - -Author + + +Author -Wilson, Don E. +Wilson, Don E. - - -Author + + +Author -Reeder, DeeAnn +Reeder, DeeAnn -text - - -2005 -The Johns Hopkins University Press - -Baltimore +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore - -Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 - - -82 -85 + + +82 +85 -book chapter -0-8018-8221-4 -10.5281/zenodo.7316519 +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 - + @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ - + [Macroscelides] intufi A. Smith 1834 diff --git a/data/7C/08/5B/7C085BDE612A198503333AA40B4EA9BC.xml b/data/7C/08/5B/7C085BDE612A198503333AA40B4EA9BC.xml index c4617edf7ff..0562650adcd 100644 --- a/data/7C/08/5B/7C085BDE612A198503333AA40B4EA9BC.xml +++ b/data/7C/08/5B/7C085BDE612A198503333AA40B4EA9BC.xml @@ -1,114 +1,114 @@ - - - -Taxonomic note of Parnassia (Celastraceae) in China: a reassessment of Subsect. Xiphosandra + + + +Taxonomic note of Parnassia (Celastraceae) in China: a reassessment of Subsect. Xiphosandra - - -Author + + +Author -Yu, Huiying +Yu, Huiying - - -Author + + +Author -Guo, Feiyi +Guo, Feiyi - - -Author + + +Author -Shu, Yumin +Shu, Yumin - - -Author + + +Author -Zhang, Zhixiang +Zhang, Zhixiang -text - - -PhytoKeys +text + + +PhytoKeys - -2018 - -114 + +2018 + +114 - -43 -54 + +43 +54 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.114.30551 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.114.30551 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.114.30551 -1314-2003-114-43 -BE7DFF96FFB68F43FFD57677FFAB5E73 -2527972 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.114.30551 +1314-2003-114-43 +BE7DFF96FFB68F43FFD57677FFAB5E73 +2527972 - - - -Parnassia delavayi Franchet, 1896: 267 -Fig. 2 + + + +Parnassia delavayi Franchet, 1896: 267 +Fig. 2 - - + + = -Parnassia brevistyla +Parnassia brevistyla (Brieg.) Hand.-Mazz., 1931: 434. Syn. nov. - + ≡ -Parnassia delavayi Franch. var. brevistyla +Parnassia delavayi Franch. var. brevistyla Brieger, 1922: 400. Syn. nov. Type: China. Tibet, ' -Beju-Batang, Nadelwalder bei Chieda am Anstieg zum Passe Mala +Beju-Batang, Nadelwalder bei Chieda am Anstieg zum Passe Mala ', 3500 m alt. (syntypes: not located); China. Schenhsi, Qingling, Taibaishan, Tempels Wan-schuen-gou, 2600 m alt., -s.n. 2720 +s.n. 2720 (syntypes: not located). - + = -Parnassia leptophylla +Parnassia leptophylla Hand.-Mazz., 1941: 120. Syn. nov. (Fig. -3 +3 ). Type: China. Sichuan, Baoxing, -KL Chu 3231 +KL Chu 3231 (lectotype designated by -Shu et al. 2017 +Shu et al. 2017 : PE00866146!; isolectotypes: IBSC0145403!, PE00865960!, SZ00179815!). Fig. -3 +3 . - -Type. - + +Type. + CHINA. Yunnan, Eryuan (Lan-kong), Hee Chanmen, 2800 m alt., 16 August 1883, -Delavay 217 +Delavay 217 (lectotype designated by -Shu et al. 2017 +Shu et al. 2017 : P05556394!; isolectotypes: P00709355!, P00709356!, P05556395!, P06392624!); CHINA. Yunnan, Eryuan, Lanho, Yanginchan, 7 August 1883, -Delavay 130 +Delavay 130 (syntypes: P00709357!, P00709358!, P06392623!) - -Description. - + +Description. + Stems 1-5, 10-40 cm, with 1 cauline leaf proximally or near middle. Basal leaves 3-7(10); petiole 2-16 cm; blade reniform, cordate or ovate-cordate, 1-4 -x +x 1-4.5 cm, base deeply cordate to subcordate, apex rounded, apiculate. Flower 2-4.5 cm in diam.; hypanthium turbinate or campanulate. Sepals oblong, ovate to obovate, 4-13 -x +x 2-8 mm, margin entire, apex rounded-obtuse. Petals white, sometimes green at base, obovate or oblong-obovate, 8-25 -x +x 5-12 mm, base attenuate, margin erose in proximal 1/3, apex rounded or acute. Anthers ellipsoid, connective projected at apex into a lanceolate appendage, to 5 mm; filaments ca. 5.5 mm; staminodes 3-6 mm, shallowly 3-lobed or to half their length, rarely lateral ones 2-lobulate, lateral lobes usually wider than central one. Ovary superior, subglobose; stigma 3-lobed. Capsule obovoid with 3 thickened, longitudinal angles. Seeds brown, glossy, oblong. 2n = 14. diff --git a/data/85/D0/84/85D084F1BDA984A531F867027099DB62.xml b/data/85/D0/84/85D084F1BDA984A531F867027099DB62.xml index 3d62d48483c..e889626648f 100644 --- a/data/85/D0/84/85D084F1BDA984A531F867027099DB62.xml +++ b/data/85/D0/84/85D084F1BDA984A531F867027099DB62.xml @@ -1,44 +1,44 @@ - - - -Order Macroscelidea + + + +Order Macroscelidea - - -Author + + +Author -Wilson, Don E. +Wilson, Don E. - - -Author + + +Author -Reeder, DeeAnn +Reeder, DeeAnn -text - - -2005 -The Johns Hopkins University Press - -Baltimore +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore - -Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 - - -82 -85 + + +82 +85 -book chapter -0-8018-8221-4 -10.5281/zenodo.7316519 +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 - + @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ - + [Macroscelides] edwardii A. Smith 1839 diff --git a/data/C7/3F/D4/C73FD49FB9555387529F029112CE81C2.xml b/data/C7/3F/D4/C73FD49FB9555387529F029112CE81C2.xml index e8d2b146284..a9ed9121f4d 100644 --- a/data/C7/3F/D4/C73FD49FB9555387529F029112CE81C2.xml +++ b/data/C7/3F/D4/C73FD49FB9555387529F029112CE81C2.xml @@ -1,44 +1,44 @@ - - - -Order Macroscelidea + + + +Order Macroscelidea - - -Author + + +Author -Wilson, Don E. +Wilson, Don E. - - -Author + + +Author -Reeder, DeeAnn +Reeder, DeeAnn -text - - -2005 -The Johns Hopkins University Press - -Baltimore +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore - -Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 - - -82 -85 + + +82 +85 -book chapter -0-8018-8221-4 -10.5281/zenodo.7316519 +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 - + @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ - + [Macroscelides] fuscipes Thomas 1894 diff --git a/data/ED/12/0B/ED120B9981BF592ECCC89D3D08305265.xml b/data/ED/12/0B/ED120B9981BF592ECCC89D3D08305265.xml index c14b618cebb..841131a592c 100644 --- a/data/ED/12/0B/ED120B9981BF592ECCC89D3D08305265.xml +++ b/data/ED/12/0B/ED120B9981BF592ECCC89D3D08305265.xml @@ -1,44 +1,44 @@ - - - -Order Macroscelidea + + + +Order Macroscelidea - - -Author + + +Author -Wilson, Don E. +Wilson, Don E. - - -Author + + +Author -Reeder, DeeAnn +Reeder, DeeAnn -text - - -2005 -The Johns Hopkins University Press - -Baltimore +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore - -Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 - - -82 -85 + + +82 +85 -book chapter -0-8018-8221-4 -10.5281/zenodo.7316519 +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 - + @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ - + [Sorex] proboscideus Shaw 1800 diff --git a/data/F4/5B/EC/F45BEC2A75C2D8A0036DEF679EB13B05.xml b/data/F4/5B/EC/F45BEC2A75C2D8A0036DEF679EB13B05.xml index 027e4764826..b044bba319e 100644 --- a/data/F4/5B/EC/F45BEC2A75C2D8A0036DEF679EB13B05.xml +++ b/data/F4/5B/EC/F45BEC2A75C2D8A0036DEF679EB13B05.xml @@ -1,44 +1,44 @@ - - - -Order Macroscelidea + + + +Order Macroscelidea - - -Author + + +Author -Wilson, Don E. +Wilson, Don E. - - -Author + + +Author -Reeder, DeeAnn +Reeder, DeeAnn -text - - -2005 -The Johns Hopkins University Press - -Baltimore +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore - -Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 - - -82 -85 + + +82 +85 -book chapter -0-8018-8221-4 -10.5281/zenodo.7316519 +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 - + @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ - + [Macroscelides] fuscus Peters 1852