diff --git a/data/03/FE/87/03FE87D8FFB3E2788C24FB86FEEF79BF.xml b/data/03/FE/87/03FE87D8FFB3E2788C24FB86FEEF79BF.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5e644cbaff9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/FE/87/03FE87D8FFB3E2788C24FB86FEEF79BF.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,567 @@
+
+
+
+Species delimitation and phylogenetic analyses of a New Guinean frog genus (Microhylidae: Hylophorbus) reveal many undescribed species and a complex diversification history driven by late Miocene events
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Ferreira, Flavien
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Kraus, Fred
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Richards, Stephen
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Oliver, Paul
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Günther, Rainer
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Trilaksono, Wahyu
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Arida, Evy Ayu
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Hamidy, Amir
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Riyanto, Awal
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Tjaturadi, Burhan
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Thébaud, Christophe
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Gaucher, Philippe
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Fouquet, Antoine
+
+text
+
+
+Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
+
+
+2023
+
+Zool. J. Linn. Soc.
+
+
+2023-12-08
+
+
+202
+
+
+2
+
+
+1
+22
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad168
+
+journal article
+10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad168
+0024-4082
+14542157
+205A49A-A66E-466E-8D6D-CBA702798B0A
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hylophorbus monophonus
+
+sp.nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Fig. 4
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+:
+MZB.Amph.24 348
+
+(field number EAA514),
+adult male
+, collected by
+Antoine Fouquet
+and
+Philippe Gaucher
+, southern slopes of
+Kumawa Mountains, Bomberai Peninsula
+,
+West Papua province
+,
+Indonesia
+(
+−4.0365
+,
+133.0703
+;
+
+400 m
+a.s.l.
+
+),
+
+12 November 2014
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Paratypes
+:
+
+One adult male
+,
+MZB.Amph.24 346
+(EAA510), and
+
+
+two adult females
+,
+MZB.Amph.24 347
+(EAA511) and
+MZB. Amph.24 351
+(EAA549), collected with the holotype
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology:
+The specific epithet ‘monophonus’ is a Latinized masculine compound adjective formed from the Greek adjective ‘monos’ (alone) and Greek noun ‘phone’ (sound, voice), as a reference to the single-note calls of this species. The name indicates a character that is diagnostic compared with
+
+Hylophorbus tetraphonus
+Günther 2001
+
+, a species that displays similar size and colour pattern.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis:
+A
+
+Hylophorbus
+species
+
+recognizable by the following unique combination of characters: (i) medium size (male SV = 26.0–
+28.2 mm
+; female SV =
+27.5–27.7 mm
+); (ii) poorly developed basal subarticular tubercle on T4 and T5 (male 4st =.53–.
+59 mm
+; female 4st =.44–.
+49 mm
+; male 5st =.52–.
+66 mm
+; female 5st =.42–.
+43 mm
+); (iii) a thenar tubercle and two palmar tubercles, ovoid, at proximal edge of hand; (iv) absence of lateral stripe (
+Fig. 4F
+); (v) dark brown or black lumbar ocellus, with pale orange anterodorsal margin (
+Fig. 4G
+); (vi) dark brown pigmentation on anterodorsal flank, forming various shapes, ranging from dark brown irregular blotches to a well-defined ‘crescent’ shape (
+Figs 4F
+,
+5A, B
+); (vii) bright yellow coloration on axilla, groin, and from anterodorsal side of thigh extending to ventral edge of flank (
+Fig. 4F, G
+); (viii) overall pale yellow coloration on the ventral surfaces (
+Fig. 4H
+); and (ix) single-pulse, single-note calls, with slight frequency modulation and dominant frequency at ~1.3 kHz (
+Fig. 4D
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Description of the
+holotype
+:
+
+Adult male (for measurements, see Supporting Information, Table S7). Head as wide as long (HL/ HW =.98); nares directed laterally, closer to tip of snout than to eye, internarial distance larger than distance from nostril to anterior edge of eye (EN/IN =.55); snout acute in lateral view, almost truncate in dorsal view. Eye moderately large (EY/ SV =.14). Tympanum large (TY/SV =.11, TY/EY =.74), supratympanic fold inconspicuous, outlined in dark brown. Skin finely granular on dorsal surfaces, with sparse flat tubercles, smooth on ventral surfaces. Fingers unwebbed, relative lengths 3> 4> 2> 1, nearly the same for F1, F2, and F4; finger-tips with slightly expanded discs, truncate, all with circum-marginal grooves. Basal subarticular tubercles on F1–F3 more developed (1–3sf =.68–.
+79 mm
+) than on F4 (4sf =.
+60 mm
+); thenar tubercle and two palmar tubercles present, ovoid, well developed, located at proximal edge of palm, with inner palmar tubercle slightly more anterior. Toes unwebbed, relative lengths 4> 3> 5> 2> 1; disc almost lacking on T1, slightly expanded on T5, and much larger on T2–T4 (twice width of penultimate phalanges), all with circum-marginal grooves. Subarticular tubercles best developed on T1–T3 (1–3st =.60–.
+75 mm
+), basal subarticular tubercles on T4–T5 indistinct; inner metatarsal tubercle ovoid, well developed (MTL = 1.00 mm), others lacking.
+
+
+Dorsum, suprascapular region, posterodorsal surface of thigh, and dorsal surface of shank light brown, with several scattered small, dark brown blotches; very thin vertebral skin ridge extending from tip of snout to urostyle. Anterior region of flanks with pale grey and dark brown irregular blotches (
+Fig. 4F
+), white speckles extending under axilla to anterior abdomen (
+Fig. 4H
+). Posterodorsal surface of forelimbs and dorsal surfaces of F3–F4 light reddish brown; brown blotch consistently present between base of F2 and F3; outer side of foot and dorsal surfaces of T4– T5 light reddish brown (
+Fig. 4F
+); dorsal surfaces of all fingers and toes with brown blotches. Dorsal and lateral surface of head light reddish brown; dorsal tip of snout, under eye, and margin of naris heavily pigmented with dark brown. Chin, throat, chest, and anterior portion of abdomen mottled with brown and having pale yellow flecks (
+Fig. 4H
+). Abdomen, ventral surfaces of thigh, and shank overall pale yellow, fading to translucent skin on anteroventral forelimbs (
+Fig. 4H
+). Axilla, groin and anterodorsal thigh to ventral edge of flank bright yellow (
+Fig. 4G, H
+). Ventral surface of hands and feet light brown. Pale red blotch above tip of urostyle, margined in black posterolaterally. Iris silver, with dark brown vertical line crossing pupil; pupil margined with incandescent orange.
+
+
+Variation:
+Only
+four specimens
+are available to assess variation within the sample (
+Supporting Information
+,
+Table S
+7).
+Relative
+size of subarticular tubercles varies between individuals, such that the longest ones on the hand are on F1–F3, and on the foot on
+T2
+–
+T3
+.
+The
+relative position of palmar tubercles is consistent between individuals (proximal;
+Supporting Information
+,
+Fig. S
+10).
+Little
+variation is visible in colour patterns among preserved specimens.
+The
+two females
+exhibit a stronger contrast between dorsal and lateral coloration, in addition to a dark brown ‘crescent’ shape on the flanks.
+They
+also exhibit four welldistinguished dorsal tubercles in the lumbar region, anterior to the lumbar ocellus.
+Information
+on colour in life for
+MZB
+.
+Amph.
+24 351 is not available; therefore, only the colour in life of
+MZB
+.
+Amph.
+24 346 and
+MZB
+.
+Amph.
+24 347 is discussed (
+Fig. 5A, B
+).
+Overall
+, colour pattern as is described for the
+holotype
+, with variation observed on the flanks and dorsal coloration. The male
+MZB
+.Amph.24 346 dorsum mixes red and dark brown coloration and displays a dark brown blotch with irregular edges on the anterior flank. The female
+MZB
+.Amph.24 347 harbours a well-defined dark brown ‘crescent’ blotch on the anterior flank; the flanks are pale grey (slightly pinkish) from the posterolateral edge of eye to the lumbar ocellus.
+
+
+
+
+Figure 4.
+
+Hylophorbus monophonus
+
+
+holotype
+MZB.Amph.24 348
+. A, dorsal view in preservative. B, ventral view in preservative. C, palm of the hand in preservative. D, sonograms and their corresponding oscillograms of a call series and single call (left and right respectively). E, sole of the foot in preservative. F, dorsolateral view in life. G, dorsolateral view of the flank and groin in life. H, ventral view in life. Photographs in preservative by A. Riyanto; photographs in life by A. Fouquet.
+
+
+
+
+Figure 5.
+Portraits in life. A, B,
+
+Hylophorbus monophonus
+
+. A, paratype MZB.Amph.24 346 (male). B, MZB.Amph.24 347 (female). C–F,
+
+Hylophorbus lengguru
+
+. C, paratype MZB.Amph.24 333 (male). D, MZB.Amph.24 335 (male). E, MZB.Amph.24 336 (male). F, MZB. Amph.24 341 (male). Photographs by A. Fouquet.
+
+
+
+Call:
+We analysed a total of 70 calls from
+three males
+(
+Table 1
+; Supporting Information, Table S3). The analysed files are deposited in the sound collection of ‘La Sonothèque du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle’ (Supporting Information, Table S3;
+Guilbert and Loret 2018
+). The advertisement call consists of a short single note, mean duration 131 ms, range 108–153 ms (
+Fig. 4D
+). The dominant frequency is 1.27 kHz (range 1.20–1.32 kHz). Notes can exhibit one harmonic, at a frequency of ~1.90 kHz. Most of the calls (notes) within a call series display similar amplitude and frequency.However, the species sometimes emits a second
+type
+of note with two pulses (Supporting Information,
+Fig. S5C
+). Mean inter-note duration is 1570 ms (range 635–2395 ms).
+
+
+
+
+
+Distribution and ecological notes:
+
+Hylophorbus monophonus
+
+
+is known only from the
+type
+locality. The species inhabits the leaf litter of pristine lowland rainforest between 300 and
+400 m
+a.s.l. Very little is known about its ecology. Interestingly, specimens of
+
+H. picoides
+
+have been sampled at the same locality (MZB. Amph.24 349 and MZB.Amph.24 350), but not syntopically (
+1100 m
+a.s.l.), suggesting that these species might not overlap in their ecology, occupying distinct elevational ranges. Such a pattern of distribution has also been documented in the
+Wondiwoi Mountains
+by
+Günther (2001)
+, where
+
+Hylophorbus wondiwoi
+Günther 2001
+
+and
+
+H. tetraphonus
+
+mainly occupy different altitudes.
+
+
+
+
+
+Comparisons with other species:
+
+Hylophorbus monophonus
+
+
+can be distinguished immediately from
+
+Hylophorbus nigrinus
+Günther 2001
+
+,
+
+H. picoides
+Günther 2001
+
+,
+
+H. atrifasciatus
+
+,
+
+H. infulatus
+
+, and
+
+H. sigridae
+
+by the absence of a lateral stripe (
+Zweifel 1972
+,
+Günther 2001
+,
+Kraus 2013
+,
+
+Günther
+et al
+. 2014
+
+); from
+
+H. extimus
+Zweifel 1972
+
+and
+
+H. myopicus
+Zweifel 1972
+
+by smaller body size (26.0–
+28.2 mm
+in
+
+H. monophonus
+
+vs. 40.0–49.0 mm); from
+
+H. proekes
+Kraus & Allison 2009
+
+and
+
+Hylophorbus sextus
+Günther 2001
+
+by its yellow ventral coloration and its single-note calls; and from
+
+H. wondiwoi
+
+by its smaller body size (>32.0 mm in
+
+H. wondiwoi
+
+) and its single-note calls. Colour patterns of
+
+H. tetraphonus
+
+(Bird’s Neck species,
+West Papua
+,
+Indonesia
+),
+
+H. richardsi
+
+(
+Hela Province
+,
+Papua New Guinea
+), and
+
+Hylophorbus rainerguentheri
+Richards & Oliver 2007
+
+(Huon Peninsula,
+Papua New Guinea
+) most resemble
+
+H. monophonus
+
+. However,
+
+H. monophonus
+
+is larger (26.0–
+28.2 mm
+) than
+
+H. richardsi
+
+(
+21.3– 22.6 mm
+), its abdomen is yellowish (vs. whitish for
+
+H. richardsi
+
+), and notes are longer (131 ms vs. ~60.5 ms);
+
+H. monophonus
+
+has a ventral–lateral and axillary yellow coloration, in addition to a conspicuous dark brown pattern on the flanks, lacking in
+
+H. rainerguentheri
+
+;
+
+H. monophonus
+
+has single-note calls, vs. one to five notes in
+
+H. tetraphonus
+
+. Finally, because of the ambiguity surrounding
+
+H. rufescens sensu
+Macleay (1878)
+
+, we cannot compare their morphology explicitly. However, their habitat
+type
+differs (lowland rainforest at
+300–400 m
+a.s.l. for
+
+H. monophonus
+
+vs. seasonal woodland and mangroves for
+
+H. rufescens
+
+), and their
+type
+localities are>
+1000 km
+apart, making their conspecificity highly unlikely.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/FE/87/03FE87D8FFB4E27A8C2EFA15FAF57FAF.xml b/data/03/FE/87/03FE87D8FFB4E27A8C2EFA15FAF57FAF.xml
index b87aaf87f77..3f933527e15 100644
--- a/data/03/FE/87/03FE87D8FFB4E27A8C2EFA15FAF57FAF.xml
+++ b/data/03/FE/87/03FE87D8FFB4E27A8C2EFA15FAF57FAF.xml
@@ -1,132 +1,119 @@
-
-
-
-Species delimitation and phylogenetic analyses of a New Guinean frog genus (Microhylidae: Hylophorbus) reveal many undescribed species and a complex diversification history driven by late Miocene events
+
+
+
+Species delimitation and phylogenetic analyses of a New Guinean frog genus (Microhylidae: Hylophorbus) reveal many undescribed species and a complex diversification history driven by late Miocene events
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Ferreira, Flavien
-Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, UMR 5174, CNRS, IRD, Université Paul Sabatier, Bâtiment 4 R 1, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 cedex 9 Toulouse, France
+Ferreira, Flavien
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Kraus, Fred
-Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
+Kraus, Fred
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Richards, Stephen
-Herpetology Department, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, Sout Australia 5000, Australia
+Richards, Stephen
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Oliver, Paul
-Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Brisbane, Queensland, 4111, Australia
+Oliver, Paul
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Günther, Rainer
-Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany
+Günther, Rainer
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Trilaksono, Wahyu
-Laboratory of Herpetology, Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biosystematics and Evolution, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gd. Widyasatwaloka, Jl. Raya Jakarta Bogor km 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
+Trilaksono, Wahyu
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Arida, Evy Ayu
-Research Center for Applied Zoology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gd. Widyasatwaloka, Jl. Raya Jakarta Bogor km 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
+Arida, Evy Ayu
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Hamidy, Amir
-Laboratory of Herpetology, Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biosystematics and Evolution, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gd. Widyasatwaloka, Jl. Raya Jakarta Bogor km 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
+Hamidy, Amir
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Riyanto, Awal
-Laboratory of Herpetology, Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biosystematics and Evolution, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gd. Widyasatwaloka, Jl. Raya Jakarta Bogor km 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
+Riyanto, Awal
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Tjaturadi, Burhan
-Center of Environment Studies, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
+Tjaturadi, Burhan
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Ŋébaud, Christophe
-Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, UMR 5174, CNRS, IRD, Université Paul Sabatier, Bâtiment 4 R 1, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 cedex 9 Toulouse, France
+Thébaud, Christophe
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Gaucher, Philippe
-Laboratoire Ecologie, Evolution, Interactions des Systèmes Amazoniens (LEEISA), USR 3456, Cayenne, French Guiana
+Gaucher, Philippe
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Fouquet, Antoine
-Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, UMR 5174, CNRS, IRD, Université Paul Sabatier, Bâtiment 4 R 1, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 cedex 9 Toulouse, France
+Fouquet, Antoine
-text
-
-
-Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
+text
+
+
+Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
-
-2024
-
-Zool. J. Linn. Soc.
+
+2023
+
+Zool. J. Linn. Soc.
-
-2023-12-08
+
+2023-12-08
-
-202
+
+202
-
-2
+
+2
-
-1
-22
+
+1
+22
-
-https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad168
+
+https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad168
-journal article
-10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad168
-0024-4082
-14542157
-205A49A-A66E-466E-8D6D-CBA702798B0A
+journal article
+10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad168
+0024-4082
+14542157
+205A49A-A66E-466E-8D6D-CBA702798B0A
@@ -141,33 +128,32 @@
-
+
(
-Fig. 6
+Fig. 6
)
+
+
-
+
Holotype
:
-MZB
-.Amph.24 334
+MZB.Amph.24 334
-(field number
-EAA304
-), adult male, collected by
+(field number EAA304), adult male, collected by
Antoine Fouquet
-and Philippe Gaucher, near
-Lobo village
-on
-Lamansiere Mountain
-, in the Lengguru foldbelt,
-Triton Bay
-, Kaimana Regency,
+and
+Philippe Gaucher
+, near
+Lobo village on Lamansiere Mountain, in the Lengguru foldbelt
+, Triton Bay,
+Kaimana Regency
+,
West Papua province
,
Indonesia
@@ -188,59 +174,58 @@ a.s.l.
-
+
Paratopotypes
:
-One adult
-male, collected at
+One adult male
+, collected at
291 m
a.s.l.
(
-MZB
-. Amph.24 333, EAA281), and
+MZB. Amph.24 333
+, EAA281), and
three adult
males and
-
+
one female
-collected with the
-holotype
-:
-MZB
-.Amph.24 335–7 (
-EAA305– 7
-; males) and
-MZB
-.Amph.24 338 (
+collected with the holotype:
+MZB.Amph.24 335–7
+(EAA305– 7; males) and
+MZB.Amph.24 338
+(
EAA338
-; female)
+;
+female
+)
.
-
+
Paratypes
:
-Ŋree
-adult males and
+Three adult males
+and
two females
collected the
11 November 2014
,
+
40 km
-southeast of
-Urisa
+southeast of Urisa
+
, in the
-Lengguru
-foldbelt,
+Lengguru foldbelt
+,
Tuguwara
,
Kaimana Regency
@@ -258,31 +243,25 @@ foldbelt,
a.s.l.
):
-MZB
-. Amph.34 341 (
-EAA457
-; male),
-MZB
-.Amph.24 344 (
-EAA470
-; male), 24 345 (
-EAA475
-; male),
-MZB
-.Amph.24 342 (
-EAA465
-; female), and
-MZB
-.Amph.24 343 (
-EAA467
-; female)
+MZB. Amph.34 341
+(EAA457; male),
+MZB.Amph.24 344
+(EAA470; male), 24 345 (EAA475; male),
+MZB.Amph.24 342
+(EAA465; female), and
+MZB.Amph.24 343
+(EAA467; female)
.
+
+
Etymology:
-Ŋe specific epithet is a proper noun in apposition, referring to the collecting localities of the species, all located in the Lengguru foldbelt, and it also refers to the 2014 ‘Lengguru’ expedition, during which the specimens were collected.
+The specific epithet is a proper noun in apposition, referring to the collecting localities of the species, all located in the Lengguru foldbelt, and it also refers to the 2014 ‘Lengguru’ expedition, during which the specimens were collected.
+
+
Diagnosis:
A
@@ -303,11 +282,13 @@ recognizable by the following unique combination of characters: (i) medium size
); (iii) a thenar tubercle and two palmar tubercles, ovoid, at proximal edge of hand; (iv) absence of lateral stripe (
Figs 5C–F
,
-6F
+6F
); (v) dark brown or black lumbar ocellus, with reddish anterior margin fading towards a ‘crescent’-shaped blackish brown blotch on anterior flank; (vi) yellow and red pigmentation of various intensity around lumbar ocellus and acromial region; (vii) bright yellow groin, axilla, and yellow flecks on rear of thigh; (viii) overall drab whitish yellow coloration on abdomen and ventral surfaces of legs; (ix) well-defined black spot of variable size on superior edge of eye, aligned with vertical dark pigmentation of iris; and (x) calls of one to six single-pulse notes (mean = 3) with an upward frequency modulation (dominant frequency ~1.13 kHz) and up to five harmonics (
-Fig. 6D
+Fig. 6D
).
+
+
Description of the
@@ -317,10 +298,10 @@ Description of the
Adult male (for measurements, see Supporting Information, Table S7). Head as wide as long (HL/ HW =.98); nares directed laterally, closer to tip of snout than to eye, internarial distance larger than distance from nostril to anterior edge of eye (EN/IN =.63); snout acute in lateral view, rounded in dorsal view, slightly pointed. Eye moderately large (EY/SV =.13). Tympanum large (TY/SV =.08, TY/ EY =.65), supratympanic fold inconspicuous, outlined by a black line overlaid by a triangular black–brown coloration, pointing ventrally. Skin finely granular with sparse flat tubercles on dorsal surfaces, smooth on ventral surfaces. Fingers unwebbed, relative lengths 3> 4> 2> 1, nearly the same for F1, F2, and F4; fingers with slightly expanded truncate discs, all with circum-marginal grooves. Subarticular tubercles on all fingers, well developed; thenar tubercle and two palmar tubercles present, ovoid, well developed, at proximal edge of palm, with inner palmar tubercle located slightly more anteriorly. Toes unwebbed, relative lengths 4> 3> 5> 2> 1; discs on T1 and T5 slightly expanded, ~1.5 times wider than penultimate phalanges, discs much larger on T2–T4, ~3 times wider than penultimate phalanges, all with circum-marginal grooves. Subarticular tubercles mostly developed on T1–T3, basal subarticular tubercles indistinct on T4–T5, inner metatarsal tubercle ovoid, well developed, others lacking.
-Posterior dorsum to inter-orbital region brown, anterodorsal head with scaưered dark brown spots; very thin vertebral skin ridge extending from tip of snout to urostyle. Ventral half of flank overall pale grey, sharply contrasted with dorsum. Small speckles of black, yellow, grey, and white extend from anterior flank to anterior abdomen. Large anterolateral ‘crescent’-shaped blotch and lumbar ocellus both black, middle flank region red, with scaưered black spots (
-Fig. 6F
-). Posterodorsal forelimb and posteroventral and anterodorsal edge of eye reddish, upper arm with strong red pigmentation; lateral snout and under eye both blackish brown. Chin, throat, chest, and anterior portion of abdomen drab white heavily moưled with brown, with scattered light grey flecks; distinct dark brown blotch on each side of posterior submandibular region (
-Fig. 6B, H
+Posterior dorsum to inter-orbital region brown, anterodorsal head with scattered dark brown spots; very thin vertebral skin ridge extending from tip of snout to urostyle. Ventral half of flank overall pale grey, sharply contrasted with dorsum. Small speckles of black, yellow, grey, and white extend from anterior flank to anterior abdomen. Large anterolateral ‘crescent’-shaped blotch and lumbar ocellus both black, middle flank region red, with scattered black spots (
+Fig. 6F
+). Posterodorsal forelimb and posteroventral and anterodorsal edge of eye reddish, upper arm with strong red pigmentation; lateral snout and under eye both blackish brown. Chin, throat, chest, and anterior portion of abdomen drab white heavily mottled with brown, with scattered light grey flecks; distinct dark brown blotch on each side of posterior submandibular region (
+Fig. 6B, H
). Anteroventral forelimbs, axilla, abdomen, and ventral thigh greyish yellow, almost transparent. Ventral shank, groin, and flecks on posterior dorsal thigh bright yellow. Hands and feet reddish brown, with dark brown blotches. Ventral surface of hands and feet light brown. Red blotch above tip of urostyle, margined in black posterolaterally. Iris silver, with dark brown vertical line crossing pupil; pupil margined with bright orange.
@@ -333,29 +314,28 @@ Figure 6.
holotype
MZB.Amph.24 334
-. A, dorsal view in preservative. B, ventral view in preservative. C, lateral view in preservative. D, sonograms and their corresponding oscillograms of a call and a single note (leħ and right, respectively). E, palm of the hand and sole of the foot in preservative. F–H, holotype in life in dorsolateral view (F), dorsal view of the thigh (G), and ventral view (H). Photographs in preservative by A. Riyanto; photographs in life by A. Fouquet.
+. A, dorsal view in preservative. B, ventral view in preservative. C, lateral view in preservative. D, sonograms and their corresponding oscillograms of a call and a single note (left and right, respectively). E, palm of the hand and sole of the foot in preservative. F–H, holotype in life in dorsolateral view (F), dorsal view of the thigh (G), and ventral view (H). Photographs in preservative by A. Riyanto; photographs in life by A. Fouquet.
Variation:
-
Eleven specimens
are available to assess variation within the samples (
Supporting Information
,
Table S
7).
-Ŋe
+The
longest basal subarticular tubercle on the hand is either 1sf or 2sf, and always 2st on the foot.
-Ŋere
+There
is extensive variation in the relative size of 3st (3st/SV =.40–.60; male 3st =.61–.
79 mm
) compared with the other basal subarticular tubercles, and 4st and 5st are either indistinct or at least less developed than other tubercles (
Supporting Information
,
-Fig. S6B
+Fig. S6B
).
-Ŋe
+The
relative size and shape of the palmar tubercles varies greatly between specimens (e.g. palmar tubercles seemingly fused on
MZB
.
@@ -378,7 +358,7 @@ relative size and shape of the palmar tubercles varies greatly between specimens
Fig. S
10).
Dorsal
-and lateral colour paưerns of preserved specimens are remarkably similar, except for
+and lateral colour patterns of preserved specimens are remarkably similar, except for
paratype
MZB
.
@@ -386,7 +366,7 @@ and lateral colour paưerns of preserved specimens are remarkably similar, excep
24 241, which displays striking blackish-brown ‘wavy’ stripes on the dorsum, top of head, and top of thigh (
Fig. 5F
).
-Moưling
+Mottling
on the chin and throat varies in density between all specimens, such that it is nearly solid dark brown with very few unpigmented areas on
MZB
.
@@ -419,34 +399,34 @@ on colour in life is available only for
Fig. 5C–F
).
Overall
-, the colour paưern in life is as described for the
+, the colour pattern in life is as described for the
holotype
, with the exception of
MZB
-.Amph.24 341, which displays striking blackish-brown motifs in dorsal view, as discussed above. Variation in pigmentation intensity in the margin of the lumbar ocellus and acromial region is observed between all specimens
-
-.
+.Amph.24 341, which displays striking blackish-brown motifs in dorsal view, as discussed above. Variation in pigmentation intensity in the margin of the lumbar ocellus and acromial region is observed between all specimens.
Call:
We analysed a total of 53 calls from
two males
, one from each locality (
-Table 1
-; Supporting Information, Table S3). Ŋe analysed files are deposited in the sound collection of ‘La Sonothèque du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle’ (Supporting Information, Table S3;
+Table 1
+; Supporting Information, Table S3). The analysed files are deposited in the sound collection of ‘La Sonothèque du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle’ (Supporting Information, Table S3;
Guilbert and Loret 2018
-). Ŋe advertisement call consists of one to six single-pulse notes (mean = 3), and mean note duration is 107 ms (range 89.0–138 ms) (
-Table 1
+). The advertisement call consists of one to six single-pulse notes (mean = 3), and mean note duration is 107 ms (range 89.0–138 ms) (
+Table 1
;
-Fig. 6D
+Fig. 6D
). Mean inter-note duration is 163 ms (range 132–208 ms). Mean dominant frequency is 1.13 kHz (range 1.10–1.14 kHz). Notes can exhibit up to five harmonics, between 1.5 and 3.5 kHz (
-Fig. 6D
+Fig. 6D
; Supporting Information,
Fig. S5D
). Notes within a call are remarkably similar in their durations, frequency, and amplitude modulations (
-Table 1
+Table 1
). Frequency modulation never exceeds an increase of.20 kHz.
+
+
Distribution and ecological notes:
@@ -458,11 +438,13 @@ is known from Lobo and Tuguwara, both in the Lengguru foldbelt (
West Papua province
,
Indonesia
-). Ŋe species inhabits the leaf liưer of pristine lowland rainforest between 300 and
+). The species inhabits the leaf litter of pristine lowland rainforest between 300 and
400 m
a.s.l.
-
+
+
+
Comparisons with other species:
@@ -477,8 +459,6 @@ can be distinguished immediately from
,
H.
-
-
atrifasciatus,
H. infulatus
@@ -549,7 +529,7 @@ by its light-brown flanks more contrasting with the dorsum, and by its notes bei
H. lengguru
-vs. ~50 ms). Colour paưerns of
+vs. ~50 ms). Colour patterns of
H. lengguru
diff --git a/data/03/FE/87/03FE87D8FFB6E2648EFDFC05FA7D7895.xml b/data/03/FE/87/03FE87D8FFB6E2648EFDFC05FA7D7895.xml
index 3159e989d5e..ca5357ef110 100644
--- a/data/03/FE/87/03FE87D8FFB6E2648EFDFC05FA7D7895.xml
+++ b/data/03/FE/87/03FE87D8FFB6E2648EFDFC05FA7D7895.xml
@@ -1,132 +1,119 @@
-
-
-
-Species delimitation and phylogenetic analyses of a New Guinean frog genus (Microhylidae: Hylophorbus) reveal many undescribed species and a complex diversification history driven by late Miocene events
+
+
+
+Species delimitation and phylogenetic analyses of a New Guinean frog genus (Microhylidae: Hylophorbus) reveal many undescribed species and a complex diversification history driven by late Miocene events
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Ferreira, Flavien
-Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, UMR 5174, CNRS, IRD, Université Paul Sabatier, Bâtiment 4 R 1, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 cedex 9 Toulouse, France
+Ferreira, Flavien
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Kraus, Fred
-Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
+Kraus, Fred
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Richards, Stephen
-Herpetology Department, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, Sout Australia 5000, Australia
+Richards, Stephen
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Oliver, Paul
-Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Brisbane, Queensland, 4111, Australia
+Oliver, Paul
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Günther, Rainer
-Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany
+Günther, Rainer
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Trilaksono, Wahyu
-Laboratory of Herpetology, Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biosystematics and Evolution, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gd. Widyasatwaloka, Jl. Raya Jakarta Bogor km 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
+Trilaksono, Wahyu
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Arida, Evy Ayu
-Research Center for Applied Zoology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gd. Widyasatwaloka, Jl. Raya Jakarta Bogor km 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
+Arida, Evy Ayu
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Hamidy, Amir
-Laboratory of Herpetology, Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biosystematics and Evolution, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gd. Widyasatwaloka, Jl. Raya Jakarta Bogor km 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
+Hamidy, Amir
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Riyanto, Awal
-Laboratory of Herpetology, Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biosystematics and Evolution, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Gd. Widyasatwaloka, Jl. Raya Jakarta Bogor km 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia
+Riyanto, Awal
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Tjaturadi, Burhan
-Center of Environment Studies, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
+Tjaturadi, Burhan
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Ŋébaud, Christophe
-Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, UMR 5174, CNRS, IRD, Université Paul Sabatier, Bâtiment 4 R 1, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 cedex 9 Toulouse, France
+Thébaud, Christophe
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Gaucher, Philippe
-Laboratoire Ecologie, Evolution, Interactions des Systèmes Amazoniens (LEEISA), USR 3456, Cayenne, French Guiana
+Gaucher, Philippe
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Fouquet, Antoine
-Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, UMR 5174, CNRS, IRD, Université Paul Sabatier, Bâtiment 4 R 1, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 cedex 9 Toulouse, France
+Fouquet, Antoine
-text
-
-
-Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
+text
+
+
+Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
-
-2024
-
-Zool. J. Linn. Soc.
+
+2023
+
+Zool. J. Linn. Soc.
-
-2023-12-08
+
+2023-12-08
-
-202
+
+202
-
-2
+
+2
-
-1
-22
+
+1
+22
-
-https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad168
+
+https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad168
-journal article
-10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad168
-0024-4082
-14542157
-205A49A-A66E-466E-8D6D-CBA702798B0A
+journal article
+10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad168
+0024-4082
+14542157
+205A49A-A66E-466E-8D6D-CBA702798B0A
@@ -141,7 +128,7 @@
-
+
(
@@ -149,25 +136,26 @@
)
+
+
-
+
Holotype
:
-MZB
-.Amph.24 339
+MZB.Amph.24 339
-(field number
-EAA357
-), adult male, collected by
+(field number EAA357),
+adult male
+, collected by
Antoine Fouquet
-and Philippe Gaucher, near
-Lobo village
-on
-Lamansiere Mountain
-, in the Lengguru foldbelt,
-Triton Bay
-, Kaimana Regency,
+and
+Philippe Gaucher
+, near
+Lobo village on Lamansiere Mountain, in the Lengguru foldbelt
+, Triton Bay,
+Kaimana Regency
+,
West Papua province
,
Indonesia
@@ -188,25 +176,26 @@ a.s.l.
-
+
Paratypes
:
-One adult
-male,
-MZB
-.Amph.24 340 (
-EAA358
-), collected with the
-holotype
+One adult male
+,
+MZB.Amph.24 340
+(EAA358), collected with the holotype
.
+
+
Etymology:
-Ŋe specific epithet is a Latin masculine adjective meaning ‘speckled’ or ‘spoưed’, in reference to the overall spoưed paưern on the ventral surfaces and flanks of this species.
+The specific epithet is a Latin masculine adjective meaning ‘speckled’ or ‘spotted’, in reference to the overall spotted pattern on the ventral surfaces and flanks of this species.
+
+
Diagnosis:
A
@@ -227,13 +216,14 @@ recognizable by the following unique combination of characters: (i) small size (
), and T4 (male 4st =.81–.
92 mm
) (Supporting Information,
-Fig. S6B
+Fig. S6B
); (iii) a thenar tubercle and two palmar tubercles, inner palmar tubercle at centre of palm; (iv) short, dark brown lateral stripe extending from the posterolateral edge of the eye to middle region of the flank (
Fig. 7E, G
); (v) dark brown lumbar ocellus; (vi) yellow groin; (vii) overall whitish ground coloration on ventral surfaces; (viii) discontinuous dark line extending from dorsal edge of lumbar ocellus to posterior lateral edge of eye, above short lateral stripe (
Fig. 7E, G
-); (ix) conspicuous dark blotches on the posterior dorsal thighs and flank between short lateral stripe and lumbar ocellus; and (x) dark brown moưling on the ventral thighs, medial feet, and anterior abdomen.
+); (ix) conspicuous dark blotches on the posterior dorsal thighs and flank between short lateral stripe and lumbar ocellus; and (x) dark brown mottling on the ventral thighs, medial feet, and anterior abdomen.
+
@@ -247,6 +237,7 @@ holotype
. A, dorsal view in preservative. B, ventral view in preservative. C, palm of the hand in preservative. D, sole of the foot in preservative. E, F, holotype in life in dorsolateral view (E) and ventral view (F). G, H, paratype MZB.Amph.24 340 in life in dorsolateral view (G) and ventral view (H). Photographs in preservative by A. Riyanto; photographs in life by A. Fouquet.
+
Description of the
@@ -262,19 +253,18 @@ Adult male (for measurements, see Supporting Information, Table S7). Head slight
), others lacking.
-Dorsum from head to shanks yellowish brown, with scaưered brown spots on suprascapular region and top of thighs (
+Dorsum from head to shanks yellowish brown, with scattered brown spots on suprascapular region and top of thighs (
Fig. 7E
). Lumbar ocellus dark brown, margined posteroventrally with bright yellow; groin bright yellow. Flank overall reddish grey, separated from dorsum by one discontinuous dark brown line extending from dorsal edge of lumbar ocellus to posteriolateral edge of eye. Small red, white, and brown speckles from anterior flank to anterior abdomen. Short black lateral stripe running from anterior edge of tympanum (which it overlays) to middle of flank, margined ventrally with white, separated from lumbar ocellus by grey coloration containing small black blotches (
Fig. 7E
-). Dorsal surfaces of F3–F4, lateral surfaces of feet, dorsal T4– T5, and posterodorsal surfaces of forelimb red (more intense on upper arm). Dorsally, F1–F2 and T1–T3 grey, with dark brown irregular spots on all fingers; dark brown blotch between base of F2 and F3; ventral surface of hands and feet brown. Chin, throat, chest, and anterior half of abdomen with inconsistent dark brown moưling; distinct dark brown blotch on each side of posterior submandibular region (
+). Dorsal surfaces of F3–F4, lateral surfaces of feet, dorsal T4– T5, and posterodorsal surfaces of forelimb red (more intense on upper arm). Dorsally, F1–F2 and T1–T3 grey, with dark brown irregular spots on all fingers; dark brown blotch between base of F2 and F3; ventral surface of hands and feet brown. Chin, throat, chest, and anterior half of abdomen with inconsistent dark brown mottling; distinct dark brown blotch on each side of posterior submandibular region (
Fig. 7F, H
). Ventral surfaces overall whitish (
Fig. 7F
-), ventral surfaces of legs with dark brown moưling. Red pigmentation above tip of urostyle, margined in black posterolaterally. Black colour around naris and eye in contact. Iris golden–copper, with dark brown vertical line crossing pupil; pupil margined with bright orange.
+), ventral surfaces of legs with dark brown mottling. Red pigmentation above tip of urostyle, margined in black posterolaterally. Black colour around naris and eye in contact. Iris golden–copper, with dark brown vertical line crossing pupil; pupil margined with bright orange.
Variation:
-
Assessment
of variation is based on only
two specimens
@@ -291,9 +281,9 @@ basal subarticular tubercle on the hand either 2sf or 4sf, and 3st or 4st on the
) (
Supporting Information
,
-Fig. S6B
+Fig. S6B
).
-Ŋe
+The
shape of the palmar tubercles varies between specimens (rounder on
MZB
.
@@ -304,7 +294,7 @@ shape of the palmar tubercles varies between specimens (rounder on
Fig. S
10).
Colour
-paưern in life or in preservative of the two available specimens is similar, with the exception of the chin and throat moưling, which are pronounced and consistent in the
+pattern in life or in preservative of the two available specimens is similar, with the exception of the chin and throat mottling, which are pronounced and consistent in the
paratype
(
MZB
@@ -315,19 +305,19 @@ paưern in life or in preservative of the two available specimens is similar, wi
vs. yellowish brown in the
holotype
.
-Ŋe
+The
red pigmentation on the upper arm and hand of the
paratype
is also less conspicuous than on the
holotype
-, but it remains conspicuous on the foot
-
-.
+, but it remains conspicuous on the foot.
Call:
Unknown.
+
+
Distribution and ecological notes:
@@ -347,6 +337,8 @@ have been sampled in the same locality (specimens MZB. Amph.24 333–8), but non
300–400 m
a.s.l.), suggesting that these species might not overlap in their ecologies and along the elevation gradient, as discussed above.
+
+
Comparisons with other species: