+
+Gnathopod 2
+(Fig.
+4 B
+) subsimilar to gnathopod 1 but elongated; basis 1.1 × that of gnathopod 1; propodus slightly longer; palmar corner with five medial robust spines.
+
+
+Pereopod 3
+(Fig.
+4 C
+) setose; basis subsimilar to that of gnathopod 1, anterior margin setose, merus with four cluster of robust setae, produced anterodistally with cluster of seta; carpus subrectangular, expanded distally, with postero-marginal cluster of thick setae; propodus rectangular, slightly convex; dactylus falcate, length ratio of basis – dactylus = 1.00: 0.22: 0.75: 0.65: 0.89: 0.37.
+
+
+Pereopod 4
+(Fig.
+4 D
+) similar to pereopod 3, slightly shortened. coxa (Fig.
+4 E
+) broad; length ratio of basis – dactylus = 1.00: 0.31: 0.77: 0.74: 0.89: 0.38.
+
+
+Pereopod 5
+(Fig.
+5 A
+), coxa bilobate, wider than long; basis subrectangular, expanded posteroventally with 10 minute setae, anterior margin with marginal short robust setae and distal long robust setae; ischium subquadrate; with antero-marginal robust setae; merus with robust setae on both margin, produced posterodistally, with cluster of seta; carpus subrectangular, expanded distally; propodus rectangular, slightly convex; dactylus falcate, length ratio of basis – dactylus = 1.00: 0.24: 0.77: 0.85: 1.06: 0.45.
+
+
+
+Pereopod 6
+(Fig.
+5 B
+) similar to pereopod 5, posterior lobe distally elongated, basis broader than that of pereopod 5, anterolateral margin with row of setae; length ratio of basis – dactylus = 1.00: 0.22: 0.79: 0.85: 1.06: 0.45.
+
+
+Pereopod 7
+(Fig.
+5 C
+) similar, but longer than either pereopods 5 or 6; basis broad, twice the area of that of pereopod 5, posterior lobe over end of ischium, anterodistal margin with short robust setae; length ratio of basis – dactylus = 1.00: 0.18: 0.70: 0.79: 1.01: 0.32.
+
+
+Uropod 1
+(Fig.
+5 D
+), peduncle subrectangular, each margin with dorsal row of robust setae.; outer ramus × 0.40 peduncle, with 11 robust setae on laterally, four robust setae on medially, two robust setae on apex; inner ramus × 0.5 peduncle, with nine dorsolateral robust setae and seven dorsomedial robust setae, apex on tow robust setae.
+
+
+Uropod 2
+(Fig.
+5 E
+), peduncle subrectangular; outer ramus 0.86 × peduncle, with seven dorsolateral robust setae and five dorsomedial robust setae, apex on tow robust setae; inner ramus 1.45 × peduncle, with 14 dorsolateral robust setae and nine dorsomedial robust setae, apex on tow robust setae.
+
+
+Uropod 3
+(Fig.
+5 F
+). peduncle short, both rami foliaceous; outer ramus 1.62 × peduncle, with 11 dorsolateral and 14 dorsomedial robust setae; inner ramus subequal to outer ramus, with 21 dorsolateral and 9 dorsomedial robust setae.
+
+
+Telson
+(Fig.
+5 G
+) linguiform, entire, 1.61 times as long as wide, with 2 setules on each side.
+
+
+
+Paratype
+, adult ovigerous female
+
+, DKUAMP 202408.
+
+
+Body
+(Figs
+2 A
+,
+6 A
+)
+11.6 mm
+long, laterally plump, coxae broader than male.
+
+
+
+Antenna 1
+(Fig.
+6 B
+) similar to that of male, peduncular articles shortened; length ratio of peduncular articles 1–3 = 1.00: 0.65: 0.32; flagellum 28 - articulate.
+
+
+Antenna 2
+(Fig.
+6 C
+) similar to that of male, peduncular articles shortened; length ratio of peduncular articles 3–5 = 1.00: 1.58: 1.60; flagellum 25 - articulate.
+
+
+Gnathopod 1
+(Fig.
+6 D
+) similar to that of male but reduced, more setose; propodus ovoid, longer than basis; palmar margin with numerous plumose setae, six strong robust spines, palmar corner with four medial robust spines.
+
+
+Gnathopod 2
+(Fig.
+6 E
+) subsimilar to gnathopod 1 but elongated; coxa expanded, similar in length with basis; basis 1.1 × that of gnathopod 1; propodus slightly longer; palmar margin with numerous plumose setae, seven strong robust spines, palmar corner with four medial robust spines.
+
+
+Remarks.
+
+Calliopius ulleungensis
+
+sp. nov.
+resembles several Pacific region species,
+
+C. behringi
+Gurjanova, 1951
+
+from King Island, Bering Sea,
+
+C. pacificus
+Bousfield & Hendrycks, 1997
+
+from
+Alaska
+,
+USA
+, and
+
+C. carinatus
+Bousfield & Hendrycks, 1997
+
+and
+
+C. columbianus
+Bousfield & Hendrycks, 1997
+
+both from
+British Columbia
+,
+Canada
+, in having two to numerous rows of calceoli on the peduncular articles on the antennae. Among them,
+
+C. behringi
+
+and
+
+C. carinatus
+
+can be easily distinguished by their strong body carination, elongated posterodistal process on antenna 1 peduncular article 3.
+
+
+In general,
+
+Calliopius ulleungensis
+
+sp. nov.
+is similar to
+
+C. columbianus
+
+. However, the new species can be distinguished from
+
+C. columbianus
+
+by the following characteristics (
+
+C. columbianus
+
+characters in parentheses): 1) eyes subrectangular (vs ovate); 2) antenna 1, posterodistal process of peduncular article 3 reaching half of flagellar article 1 (vs reaching the end of flagellar article 1); 3) antennae flagellum with fewer than 30 articles (vs with more than 30 articles, up to 40); and 4) maxilla 1, inner plate with 4 apical pappose setae (vs with 5 apical pappose setae).
+
+Calliopius ulleungensis
+
+is geographically close to
+
+C. ezoensis
+
+. The collection sites of
+
+C. ezoensis
+
+are on the southern and northeastern coasts of
+Hokkaido
+(
+Shimoji et al. 2020
+), connected to the collection site of
+
+C. ulleungensis
+
+across the Tsugaru Strait and La Pérouse Strait. The females of both species are morphologically similar, with two or more rows of calceoli and a short process on the third article of antenna 1 peduncle. However, the new species can be distinguished from
+
+C. ezoensis
+
+by the following characteristics (
+
+C. ezoensis
+
+characters in parentheses): 1) male antennae with two or more rows of calceoli (vs one row of calceoli); 2) male gnathopod 2 larger than gnathopod 1 (vs gnathopod 1 larger than gnathopod); 3) in female antenna 2 peduncular article 4–5, rows of calceoli start from 1 / 4 of the basal (vs from half of the basal).
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The species name is derived from the
+type
+locality, Ulleungdo Island located off the East Sea of
+Korea
+.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Korea
+(Gangwon-do, Ulleungdo Island, East Sea).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/13/2D/0D/132D0DA085E95AAD8766B808584A0A45.xml b/data/13/2D/0D/132D0DA085E95AAD8766B808584A0A45.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..530345d4a02
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/13/2D/0D/132D0DA085E95AAD8766B808584A0A45.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+
+
+
+Miscellaneous notes on the systematics of and synonymy in Entiminae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yunakov, Nikolai
+0000-0002-0824-7804
+Institute of Biodiversity, NGO, 109 West Wyoming Ave., Melrose, MA 02176, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Korotyaev, Boris
+0000-0002-3492-2746
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alziar, Gabriel
+2 сité Beauséjour, 12120 Cassagnes-Bégonhès, France
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-20
+
+
+74
+
+
+2
+
+
+249
+264
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e136994
+33208AAA-4462-4248-AB0C-F6B1D46BB1DF
+
+
+
+
+
+Polydrusus reitteri
+Kirsch, 1878
+
+
+
+
+
+Notes.
+
+
+All attempts to trace
+type
+specimens of
+
+Polydrusus reitteri
+
+in
+
+MTD
+
+among Kirsch’s material were unsuccessful. The species was described from Mikwena at Rioni River,
+Georgia
+and compared with
+
+Polydrusus sparsus
+Gyllenhal, 1834
+
+, a species unknown from the Caucasus.
+
+Polydrusus reitteri
+
+has been mistakenly placed in the genus
+
+Myllocerus
+Schoenherr, 1823
+
+by
+Ramamurthy and Ghai (1988)
+, as
+no
+
+Myllocerus
+species
+
+is known from
+Georgia
+(Cholokava 2008). Instead, there is
+
+Polydrusus rufulus
+Hochhuth 1847
+
+, which has some rostrum features resembling those of
+
+Myllocerus
+
+. According to the original description,
+
+P. reitteri
+
+may well be a synonym of
+
+P. rufulus
+Hochhuth, 1847
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/27/9F/C6/279FC69F428153B8935B3A772C32F1A4.xml b/data/27/9F/C6/279FC69F428153B8935B3A772C32F1A4.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9206582b720
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/27/9F/C6/279FC69F428153B8935B3A772C32F1A4.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+
+
+
+Miscellaneous notes on the systematics of and synonymy in Entiminae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yunakov, Nikolai
+0000-0002-0824-7804
+Institute of Biodiversity, NGO, 109 West Wyoming Ave., Melrose, MA 02176, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Korotyaev, Boris
+0000-0002-3492-2746
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alziar, Gabriel
+2 сité Beauséjour, 12120 Cassagnes-Bégonhès, France
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-20
+
+
+74
+
+
+2
+
+
+249
+264
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e136994
+33208AAA-4462-4248-AB0C-F6B1D46BB1DF
+
+
+
+
+
+Phyllobius
+(
+Phyllobius
+)
+constellatus
+(
+Voss, 1959
+)
+
+comb. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 5
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Polydrusus
+(
+Tylodrusus
+)
+constellatus
+
+Voss, 1959: 2
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+material.
+
+
+
+2 ♀
+paratypes
+;
+IRAN
+(Recht) / Tahergourabe [= Taher Gourab,
+Gilan Province
+] / (feucht) 0 m. u. M. /
+
+VI
+. 1950
+
+/ F. Schäuffele leg. [blue label, printed]; Polydrusus / constellatus m. [handwritten];
+Paratypus
+[red label, printed]; Polydrusus / constellatus m. [handwritten];
+
+ZMH
+
+839374.
+
+
+
+
+Notes.
+
+
+This species was described from Taher Gourab in
+Gilan Province
+,
+Iran
+. Examination of the
+paratypes
+in
+
+ZMH
+
+revealed completely dorsal placement of the antennal scrobes and sharp lateral margin of the protibiae (Fig.
+5 E
+) similar to those in the
+
+Phyllobius pyri
+
+L. species group, which is already known from
+Iran
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Phyllobius constellatus
+
+comb. nov.
+:
+A.
+
+Polydrusus constellatus
+
+, paratype 1, body dorsal and lateral view;
+C, D.
+
+Polydrusus constellatus
+
+, paratype 2, body dorsal and lateral view;
+E.
+
+Polydrusus constellatus
+
+, paratype 2, head dorsal view and forelegs;
+F.
+Labels. Photo credit: by Matthias Seidel (
+ZMH
+), CC-BY 4.0.
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/35/2C/C0/352CC0C702C65D2F91CD5D90805EF712.xml b/data/35/2C/C0/352CC0C702C65D2F91CD5D90805EF712.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f36fca6b3f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/35/2C/C0/352CC0C702C65D2F91CD5D90805EF712.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,414 @@
+
+
+
+A new genus, Sinodromus gen. nov., with two new species and the first description of the female of Philodromus guiyang Long & Yu, 2022 (Arachnida, Araneae, Philodromidae) from China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Wang, Zhong-jing
+https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6377-6840
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yao, Yan-bin
+0000-0002-2560-9299
+Jinshan College of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Tang, Zi-ying
+https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8513-456X
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Li, Wen-hui
+0000-0002-8074-9526
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Liu, Ke-ke
+0000-0001-7822-3667
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Xu, Xiang
+0000-0001-9485-5373
+College of Life Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, Hunan, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-20
+
+
+1221
+
+
+279
+296
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1221.137930
+7EE4D14C-4869-4130-ABF6-DF42B903476B
+
+
+
+
+Genus
+
+Sinodromus
+Yao & Liu
+
+gen. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+species.
+
+
+
+
+Sinodromus fujianensis
+Yao & Liu
+
+,
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+The new genus is similar to
+
+Tibellus
+Simon,
+1875 in
+
+having a similar habitus (cf. Figs
+3
+–
+7
+,
+8 B, C
+and
+Kastrygina and Kovblyuk 2016
+: figs 1 A, 2 A, 3 A, 4 A, 5 A, B, 6 A, B), but it can be easily distinguished from
+
+Tibellus
+
+(cf. Figs
+3
+–
+7
+,
+8 B, C
+and
+Kastrygina and Kovblyuk 2016
+: figs 1 C, G, H, J, K, 2 C, G, H, 3 F, G, 4 C, F, G, 5 D, J, K, 6 D, F, G) by the very small
+PME
+, nearly as long as 1 / 2 of the
+AME
+diameter (vs the large
+PME
+as long as
+AME
+diameter), the palp with two tibial apophyses (vs one), the presence of a cymbial process (vs absent), the epigyne with a pair of teeth (vs absent), and the relatively thin, tube-shaped copulatory ducts (vs broad). Species of
+
+Sinodromus
+
+gen. nov.
+also resemble those of
+
+Pulchellodromus
+
+Wunderlich,
+2012 in
+
+
+having a blunt cymbium and spine-like
+RTA
+(cf. Figs
+4 A – C
+,
+5 A, B, D, E
+and
+Lecigne et al. 2019
+: fig. 3 F and
+Song and Zhu 1997
+: fig. 134 C, D), but the genus can be easily distinguished from
+
+Pulchellodromus
+
+by the slender habitus (vs relatively broad), the male palp with a ventro-prolateral tibial apophysis (vs absent), the well-developed conductor with scaly serrations (vs the undeveloped conductor lacking scaly serrations), and the epigyne with a pair of teeth anterolaterally (vs absent) (cf. Figs
+3
+–
+7
+,
+8 B, C
+and
+Lecigne et al. 2019
+: figs 4 F, 5 F and
+Song and Zhu 1997
+: fig. 134 A, B).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+SEMs of
+
+Sinodromus fujianensis
+
+sp. nov.
+, male palp of paratypes
+A
+left palp, ventral view
+B
+same, detail of ventro-prolateral and retrolateral tibial apophyses, ventral view
+C
+same, detail of anterior tegulum, ventral view
+D
+detail of retrolateral tibial apophysis and cymbial process, retrolateral view
+E
+right palp, detail of tibial apophyses, prolateral view
+F
+same, tegulum, ventral view
+G
+same, detail of anterior tegulum, ventral view
+H
+same, detail of conductor, ventral view
+I
+same, detail of anterior tegulum, retrolatero-ventral view
+J
+same, detail of anterior tegulum, ventral view, slightly frontal
+K
+same, detail of tegular apophysis and embolic tip after removing part of conductor, ventral view, slightly frontal
+L
+same, detail of conductor, ventral view
+M
+same, detail of embolus, ventral view. Abbreviations:
+Con
+– conductor,
+CP
+– cymbial process
+Em
+– embolus,
+RTA
+– retrolateral tibial apophysis,
+TA
+– tegular apophysis,
+VTA
+– ventro-prolateral tibial apophysis.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Sinodromus fujianensis
+
+sp. nov.
+, female epigyne of paratype
+A
+epigyne, ventral view
+B
+vulva, dorsal view. Abbreviations:
+At
+– atrium, CD – copulatory duct, CO – copulatory opening, ET – epigynal tooth, FD – fertilization duct, GA – glandular appendage, GM – glandular mound, MS – median septum, Spe – spermatheca. Scale bars: 0.05 mm.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Sinodromus perbrevis
+
+sp. nov.
+, female holotype
+A
+habitus, dorsal view
+B
+same, ventral view
+C
+epigyne, ventral view
+D
+vulva, dorsal view. Abbreviations: CD – copulatory duct, ET – epigynal tooth, FD – fertilization duct, GA – glandular appendage, GM – glandular mound, MS – median septum, Spe – spermatheca. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (
+A, B
+); 0.1 mm (
+C, D
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Small spiders, body length
+2.5–4.5 mm
+. Male habitus with more black spots than in females.
+Eyes
+:
+AME
+,
+ALE
+, and
+PLE
+oval, with relatively large eye cups,
+PME
+rounded, smaller than other eyes, with small eye cups, anterior eye row and posterior eye row strongly recurved. Chelicerae with two promarginal teeth and no retromarginal teeth. Broad brown median band present on carapace and abdomen, and white or grey bands present on carapace and abdomen laterally. Abdomen elongate, with a notch anteromedially and pointed at posterior end.
+
+
+Male palp
+: tibia with two apophyses, ventro-prolateral and retrolateral, both finger-like; cymbium with blunt postero-retrolateral process, directed towards base of retrolateral tibial apophysis; sperm duct slender, curving back on itself, located medially; conductor large, covers embolus, with scaly serrations; tegular apophysis thick and large, slightly sclerotized; embolus spine-like. Epigyne with conspicuous epigynal teeth anterolaterally; median septum triangular; copulatory openings located laterally to median septum; copulatory ducts tube-shaped; spermathecae oval, slightly separated.
+
+
+
+
+Species composition.
+
+
+
+S. fujianensis
+
+sp. nov.
+(
+type
+species) and
+
+S. perbrevis
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+China
+(
+Fujian
+,
+Hunan
+, and
+Jiangxi
+Provinces; Fig.
+10
+).
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The genus name is formed from a combination of
+sino
+- from the Latin “
+Sinae
+” referring to
+China
+, and -
+dromus
+, from “
+Philodromidae
+”; the gender is masculine.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/41/05/96/410596539C0C5EFD91D509E2C260578B.xml b/data/41/05/96/410596539C0C5EFD91D509E2C260578B.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a0766c137a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/41/05/96/410596539C0C5EFD91D509E2C260578B.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,538 @@
+
+
+
+A new genus, Sinodromus gen. nov., with two new species and the first description of the female of Philodromus guiyang Long & Yu, 2022 (Arachnida, Araneae, Philodromidae) from China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Wang, Zhong-jing
+https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6377-6840
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yao, Yan-bin
+0000-0002-2560-9299
+Jinshan College of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Tang, Zi-ying
+https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8513-456X
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Li, Wen-hui
+0000-0002-8074-9526
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Liu, Ke-ke
+0000-0001-7822-3667
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Xu, Xiang
+0000-0001-9485-5373
+College of Life Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, Hunan, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-20
+
+
+1221
+
+
+279
+296
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1221.137930
+7EE4D14C-4869-4130-ABF6-DF42B903476B
+
+
+
+
+
+Sinodromus fujianensis
+Yao & Liu
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figs 3
+,
+4
+,
+5
+,
+6
+,
+8 B
+,
+9 C – F Common name: 福建华逍遥蛛
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+material.
+
+
+
+
+
+China
+
+:
+Fujian Province
+:
+
+Holotype
+
+•
+♂
+:
+Fuzhou City
+,
+Cangshan District
+,
+Jinshan College
+of
+Fujian
+Agriculture
+and
+Forestry University
+,
+
+26 ° 2 ' 21.12 " N
+,
+119 ° 19 ' 56.66 " E
+
+,
+
+24 February 2024
+
+,
+Y. Yao
+leg. (20240224, Phi- 5,
+ASM-JGSU
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+Paratypes
+
+
+•
+2 ♂
+,
+2 ♀
+, the same data as the holotype
+
+•
+
+2 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+,
+Fuzhou City
+,
+Yongtai County
+,
+Geling Town
+,
+Yangxi Village
+,
+Tianmen Mountain
+,
+
+25 ° 49 ' 7.6 " N
+,
+119 ° 1 ' 5.07 " E
+
+,
+
+320 m
+a. s. l.
+
+,
+
+23 March 2024
+
+,
+Y. Yao
+,
+Q. Wu
+, and
+Z. Chen
+leg. (20240323, Phi- 5,
+ASM-JGSU
+).
+Jiangxi Province
+
+•
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Ji’an City
+,
+Jinggangshan County
+Level City,
+Huang’ao Town
+,
+Jiebei Group
+,
+
+26 ° 28 ' 40.8 " N
+,
+114 ° 14 ' 16.8 " E
+
+,
+
+297 m
+a. s. l.
+
+,
+
+6 April 2015
+
+,
+Z. Chen
+,
+G. Li
+,
+K. Liu
+,
+Z. Meng
+,
+Y. Zhao
+leg. (20150406, Phi- 5,
+ASM-JGSU
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Males of the new species are easily distinguished from other philodromid spiders by the following combination of morphological characteristics: (1) the thumb-like retrolateral tibial apophysis with a membranous basal apophysis on the male palpal tibia, (2) the tegular apophysis with several ridges, and (3) the conductor with scale-like serrations (Figs
+4 A – E
+,
+5 A – M
+). The female resembles that of
+
+Sinodromus perbrevis
+
+sp. nov.
+in having spermathecae with a short stalk and crescent-shaped fertilization ducts, but it can be separated by the triangular epigynal teeth (vs oval), the copulatory openings located at the mediolateral part of the epigyne (vs anterolateral), and the very short copulatory ducts (vs relatively long) (cf. Figs
+6 A, B
+,
+8 B
+,
+7 C, D
+,
+8 C
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+SEM pictures of epigynes, ventral view
+A
+
+Philodromus guiyang
+Long & Yu, 2022
+
+B
+
+Sinodromus fujianensis
+
+sp. nov.
+C
+
+S. perbrevis
+
+sp. nov
+.. Abbreviations:
+At
+– atrium, CO – copulatory opening, ET – epigynal tooth, MS – median septum.
+
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+
+Male (
+holotype
+)
+
+. Habitus as in Figs
+3 A, B
+,
+9 C, D
+. Total length 3.83. Carapace medially with dense yellowish-brown setae, laterally with dense white setae, 1.46 long, 1.30 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances (Fig.
+3 A
+):
+AME
+0.05,
+ALE
+0.06,
+PME
+0.03,
+PLE
+0.07,
+AME
+–
+AME
+0.14,
+AME
+–
+ALE
+0.09,
+PME
+–
+PME
+0.24,
+ALE
+–
+ALE
+0.41,
+PME
+–
+PLE
+0.22,
+PLE
+–
+PLE
+0.68,
+ALE
+–
+PLE
+0.23,
+AME
+–
+PME
+0.11,
+AME
+–
+PLE
+0.34.
+MOA
+0.15 long, 0.22 front width, 0.30 back width. Chelicerae with two promarginal teeth (proximal larger) and no retromarginal teeth. Leg measurements: I 6.64 (1.91, 0.60, 1.68, 1.53, 0.92); II 8.32 (2.34, 0.82, 2.14, 1.97, 1.05); III 5.18 (1.63, 0.54, 1.22, 1.17, 0.62); IV 6.37 (2.12, 0.65, 1.29, 1.57, 0.74). Leg spination: I Pa: d 1, p 1, r 1; Ti: d 2, p 2, r 2, v 5; Mt: d 1, p 2, r 2, v 2; II Pa: v 1; Ti: d 2, p 2, r 2, v 5; Mt: d 1, p 1, r 2, v 1; III Pa: v 1; Ti: d 2, p 1, r 2, v 3; Mt: d 2, p 2, r 3, v 3; IV Fe: d 2; Pa: d 1; Ti: d 2, p 2, r 1; Mt: d 2, p 2, r 3. Abdomen (Fig.
+3 A, B
+) medially with dense yellow-brown setae, laterally with dense white setae, 2.47 long, 0.91 wide.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+A, B
+living specimen of
+
+Philodromus guiyang
+Long & Yu, 2022
+
+C, D
+
+Sinodromus fujianensis
+
+sp. nov.
+, male
+E, F
+
+S. fujianensis
+
+, female.
+
+
+
+Coloration
+(Figs
+3 A, B
+,
+9 C, D
+). Carapace yellow, with many black dots, laterally with broad yellowish stripes, posteriorly with two pairs of black spots. Chelicerae and endites yellow. Labium yellow, with brown spot posteriorly. Sternum shield-like, yellowish, with dense black dots. Legs with many black dots. Abdomen yellowish to yellow, dorsally with dense black dots, medially with broad yellow stripe, laterally with grey stripes; venter with many pairs of black spots bilaterally.
+
+
+Palp
+(Figs
+4 A – E
+,
+5 A – M
+). Tibia with two apophyses, the ventro-prolateral one short, slightly curved dorsally toward posterior part of tegulum, the retrolateral one finger-like, with a membranous basal apophysis. Cymbial process strongly protruding, approaching the base of retrolateral tibial apophysis. Sperm duct thin, curving back on itself, clearly visible from posterior to prolateral part. Tegular apophysis thick, horn-like, with a blunt basal apophysis. Conductor slightly sclerotized, longer than embolus, covers embolus, with many scaly serrations. Embolus short, hook-shaped, tapering to a point.
+
+
+
+Female (
+paratype
+).
+
+Habitus as in Figs
+3 C, D
+,
+9 E, F
+. As in male, except as noted. Total length 5.00. Carapace: 1.50 long, 1.45 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances (Fig.
+3 C
+):
+AME
+0.05,
+ALE
+0.05,
+PME
+0.03,
+PLE
+0.06,
+AME
+–
+AME
+0.19,
+AME
+–
+ALE
+0.11,
+PME
+–
+PME
+0.29,
+ALE
+–
+ALE
+0.48,
+PME
+–
+PLE
+0.24,
+PLE
+–
+PLE
+0.80,
+ALE
+–
+PLE
+0.22,
+AME
+–
+PME
+0.13,
+AME
+–
+PLE
+0.36.
+MOA
+0.16 long, 0.28 front width, 0.36 back width. Leg measurements: I 5.22 (1.46, 0.70, 1.31, 1.10, 0.65); II 6.38 (1.76, 0.83, 1.61, 1.39, 0.79); III 4.32 (1.33, 0.50, 1.02, 0.97, 0.50); IV 6.05 (1.97, 0.63, 1.47, 1.33, 0.65). Leg spination: I Fe: d 1; Ti: d 2, p 2, r 5, v 4; Mt: p 3, r 3, v 3; II Ti: d 2, p 3, r 3, v 3; Mt: p 3, r 3, v 2; III Ti: d 2, p 2, r 1, v 2; Mt: p 3, r 1, v 3; IV Pa: v 1; Ti: d 1, p 2, r 1, v 2; Mt: p 1, r 3, v 6. Abdomen 3.50 long, 1.41 wide.
+
+
+Coloration
+(Figs
+3 C, D
+,
+9 E, F
+). Paler than male. Carapace yellowish to yellow, with sparse black dots. Sternum laterally with many black dots. Legs yellowish white, with sparse dark spots. Abdomen with abundant silver spots and sparse black dots on surface.
+
+
+Epigyne
+(Figs
+6 A, B
+,
+8 B
+) slightly longer than wide. Epigynal teeth lamellar, subtriangular, located anterolaterally on epigyne. Atrium small, separated by median septum. Median septum narrow, anteriorly subtriangular. Copulatory openings directed posteriorly, located on the sides of the antero-lateral part of median septum, slightly covered by epigynal teeth. Glandular appendages located at the beginning part of copulatory ducts, directed anteriorly. Copulatory ducts slightly curved, slightly shorter than spermathecae. Spermathecae slightly separated, round, with a short stalk. Glandular mounds slightly protruding, truncate, located on anterolateral part of spermathecae, directed laterally. Fertilization ducts nearly as long as 1 / 2 of spermathecal width, directed antero-laterally.
+
+
+
+
+Biology.
+
+The coloration and habitus are the same as the grassland community from which they are collected and provides them with camouflage.
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Known from the
+type
+locality in
+Fujian Province
+, as well as
+Jiangxi Province
+,
+China
+(Fig.
+10
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Distributional records of
+
+Philodromus guiyang
+Long & Yu, 2022
+
+(black circles),
+
+Sinodromus fujianensis
+
+sp. nov.
+(green triangles) and
+
+S. perbrevis
+
+sp. nov.
+(red stars) from China.
+
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The specific name refers to the
+type
+locality.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/46/B6/A7/46B6A7ABF3115773820D5490E328FE94.xml b/data/46/B6/A7/46B6A7ABF3115773820D5490E328FE94.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..026ac76a40c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/46/B6/A7/46B6A7ABF3115773820D5490E328FE94.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,409 @@
+
+
+
+Miscellaneous notes on the systematics of and synonymy in Entiminae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yunakov, Nikolai
+0000-0002-0824-7804
+Institute of Biodiversity, NGO, 109 West Wyoming Ave., Melrose, MA 02176, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Korotyaev, Boris
+0000-0002-3492-2746
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alziar, Gabriel
+2 сité Beauséjour, 12120 Cassagnes-Bégonhès, France
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-20
+
+
+74
+
+
+2
+
+
+249
+264
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e136994
+33208AAA-4462-4248-AB0C-F6B1D46BB1DF
+
+
+
+
+
+Peronaspis claviger
+(
+Faust, 1894
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 1 C, D
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Corigetus claviger
+
+Faust, 1894: 56
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Taurostomus claviger
+
+(
+Faust, 1894
+):
+
+Marshall 1944: 86
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Peronaspis claviger
+
+(
+Faust, 1894
+):
+
+Nasreddinov 1974: 665
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Viridistylus robustus
+
+Colonnelli & Paladini, 2019: 190
+,
+syn. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Material examined.
+
+
+
+TURKMENISTAN
+•
+1 ♂
+; “
+Kushka
+”; “ ex coll.
+G. L. Suvorov
+”;
+
+ZIN
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+; “
+Transc. Wuste Kara-Kum
+”; “
+
+Corigetus claviger
+Rost
+
+”;
+
+ZIN
+
+
+.
+
+TAJIKISTAN
+•
+1 ♀
+;
+Aivadzh – Shaartuz
+; sand desert;
+
+15 May 1961
+
+;
+I. M. Kerzhner
+leg.;
+
+ZIN
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+;
+Aivadzh
+near
+Shaartuz
+,
+
+24 Apr. 1959
+
+;
+L. Mikitova
+leg.;
+
+ZIN
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+;
+Khozreti-Sho Range
+:
+10 km
+from
+Muminabad
+,
+
+16 Jun. 1966
+
+;
+I. K. Lopatin
+leg.;
+
+ZIN
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+;
+Sarkoron
+; meadow;
+
+18 Jun. 1958
+
+;
+I. K. Lopatin
+leg.;
+
+ZIN
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+Kabadian
+,
+
+15 Apr. 1928
+
+;
+Novitskii
+leg.;
+
+ZIN
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+;
+Tigrovaya Balka Nature Reserve
+,
+
+Apr. 1966
+
+;
+O. L. Kryzhanovskij
+leg.;
+
+ZIN
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♀
+;
+Dzharkurgan
+, desert, spiny plants,
+
+2 May 1986
+
+;
+Pekin
+leg.;
+
+ZIN
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+“
+Бух.
+[ара] Тоби-Дора, № 132, Вильберг ” [
+Buchara
+,
+Tobi-Dora
+, № 132,
+Vilberg
+leg.];
+
+ZIN
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Notes.
+
+
+Recently,
+Colonnelli and Paladini (2019)
+described the genus
+
+Viridistylus
+
+in the tribe
+Mesostyloidini
+. The authors noted that the mandibular process is almost straight and forms an angle of about 30 degrees with the sides of the rostrum, but the authors say nothing about the genal process. After examination of the description and image of the beetle provided in the paper, we hypothesized that it was actually a species of
+
+Peronaspis
+
+. To verify this, we compared the image with
+two syntypes
+of
+
+Peronaspis claviger
+
+and other material of this species in the
+
+ZIN
+
+collection.
+
+
+
+Peronaspis claviger
+
+is a Middle Asian species of the tribe
+Cyphicerini
+, notable for its highly unusual structure of the pterygia bearing a genal process (
+Faust 1894
+;
+Marshall 1944
+), and females with the left mandible bearing rather long deciduous process, and ventral parts of the pterygia strongly spiniform, projecting anterolaterally.
+
+
+Marshall (1944)
+examined
+
+Corigetus claviger
+Faust
+
+, with its large genal process, and erected for it the genus
+
+Taurostomus
+
+. Later,
+Nasreddinov (1974)
+compared
+
+Taurostomus claviger
+
+with
+
+Peronaspis bucharica
+
+and discovered their close relationship, concluding that
+
+Taurostomus
+
+is a junior synonym of
+
+Peronaspis
+
+.
+
+
+We suggest that the attribution of
+
+Viridistylus robustus
+
+was based on a misinterpretation of the genal process as the permanent mandibular process (pedicel) characteristic of
+
+Mesostyloidini (
+Thompson 1992
+)
+
+.
+
+Viridistylus robustus
+
+has the genal process and is conspecific with
+
+Peronaspis claviger
+(
+Faust, 1894
+)
+
+, sharing all morphological characters with the latter.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/53/89/7C/53897C6460885DD89B8E96768B3FFB70.xml b/data/53/89/7C/53897C6460885DD89B8E96768B3FFB70.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4b8426196ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/53/89/7C/53897C6460885DD89B8E96768B3FFB70.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+
+
+
+Miscellaneous notes on the systematics of and synonymy in Entiminae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yunakov, Nikolai
+0000-0002-0824-7804
+Institute of Biodiversity, NGO, 109 West Wyoming Ave., Melrose, MA 02176, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Korotyaev, Boris
+0000-0002-3492-2746
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alziar, Gabriel
+2 сité Beauséjour, 12120 Cassagnes-Bégonhès, France
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-20
+
+
+74
+
+
+2
+
+
+249
+264
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e136994
+33208AAA-4462-4248-AB0C-F6B1D46BB1DF
+
+
+
+
+
+Polydrusus
+(
+Eudipnus
+)
+freyi
+Zumpt, 1933
+
+
+
+
+
+Notes.
+
+
+The male
+holotype
+and female
+paratype
+from the collection of Museum G. Frey have been examined in the Zoologische Staatssammlung München by Boris A. Korotyaev, both undoubtedly belong to
+
+P. rufulus
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution notes.
+
+
+This species is ranged through the Caucasus, northern part of
+Asia Minor
+to
+Alborz Mountains
+in
+Iran
+(Fig.
+9 B
+), where it inhabits floodland and mountain forests along large rivers.
+Russia
+:
+Krasnodar
+Territory (Schilsky 1910),
+Adygea
+(Korotyaev and Arzanov 2010),
+Chechnya
+,
+Dagestan
+,
+Ingushetia
+,
+Kabardino-Balkaria
+,
+North Ossetia
+(
+Ismailova 2007
+).
+Georgia
+(Schilsky 1910, Cholokava 2008), Azerbaijan: Lankaran (Schilsky 1910), the Asian part of
+Turkey
+(
+Lodos 1977
+;
+Lodos et al. 2003
+). Schilsky (1910) recorded
+
+P. rufulus
+
+from Adrianople (=
+Edirne
+) based on specimens collected by Max Korb but the further comprehensive weevil surveys in
+Turkey
+(
+Lodos 1977
+;
+Lodos et al. 2003
+) did not confirm this. On the other hand, N. Lodos recorded
+
+P. sparsus
+
+in western
+Turkey
+and the latter is also known from
+Greece
+. Thus, Schilsky’s record from
+Edirne
+is most likely based on the misidentification of
+
+P. sparsus
+
+. In
+Turkey
+(provinces of
+Bartin
+and
+Bolu
+)
+
+P. rufulus
+
+is probably sympatric with the closely related
+
+P. sparsus
+(
+Lodos et al. 2003
+)
+
+. In 2024
+
+P. rufulus
+
+was collected in Hyrcanian forests,
+Mazandaran Province
+of
+Iran
+(first country record); photographs of
+one specimen
+were received from Zahra Azizi (Environmental Science Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor,
+Iran
+) and examined by the first author.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/79/A6/3F/79A63F9D5C1F59B69593D8196B60CB0B.xml b/data/79/A6/3F/79A63F9D5C1F59B69593D8196B60CB0B.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..aa4593b0f00
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/79/A6/3F/79A63F9D5C1F59B69593D8196B60CB0B.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
+
+
+
+A new genus, Sinodromus gen. nov., with two new species and the first description of the female of Philodromus guiyang Long & Yu, 2022 (Arachnida, Araneae, Philodromidae) from China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Wang, Zhong-jing
+https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6377-6840
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yao, Yan-bin
+0000-0002-2560-9299
+Jinshan College of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Tang, Zi-ying
+https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8513-456X
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Li, Wen-hui
+0000-0002-8074-9526
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Liu, Ke-ke
+0000-0001-7822-3667
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Xu, Xiang
+0000-0001-9485-5373
+College of Life Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, Hunan, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-20
+
+
+1221
+
+
+279
+296
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1221.137930
+7EE4D14C-4869-4130-ABF6-DF42B903476B
+
+
+
+
+
+Sinodromus perbrevis
+Yao & Liu
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figs 7
+,
+8 C Common name: 短华逍遥蛛
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+material.
+
+
+
+
+
+China
+
+:
+Jiangxi Province
+:
+
+Holotype
+
+•
+♀
+,
+Ji’an City
+,
+Jinggangshan County
+Level City,
+Ciping Town
+,
+Huangyangjie Scenic Spot
+,
+
+26 ° 37 ' 21.6 " N
+,
+114 ° 6 ' 21.6 " E
+
+,
+
+958 m
+a. s. l.
+
+,
+
+5 April 2014
+
+,
+Z. Chen
+,
+K. Liu
+,
+Z. Meng
+,
+Y. Tang
+,
+X. Huang
+leg. (20140405, Phi- 06,
+ASM-JGSU
+)
+
+.
+
+
+Paratypes
+
+•
+1 ♀
+,
+Ji’an City
+,
+Jinggangshan County
+Level City,
+JingZhu Mountain
+,
+
+26 ° 29 ' 45.6 " N
+,
+114 ° 4 ' 44.4 " E
+
+,
+
+1146 m
+a. s. l.
+
+,
+
+20 December 2015
+
+,
+K. Liu
+,
+Z. Chen
+,
+Z. Meng
+,
+Q. Chen
+,
+S. Wu
+,
+P. Gong
+leg. (20151220, Phi- 06,
+ASM-JGSU
+).
+Hunan Province
+
+•
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Hengshan Mountain
+,
+
+27 ° 16.504 ' N
+,
+112 ° 42.304 ' E
+
+,
+
+815 m
+a. s. l.
+
+,
+
+1–7 May 2007
+
+,
+G. Tang
+,
+P. Hu
+,
+Q. Wang
+leg. (Phi- 06,
+
+HNU
+
+)
+
+•
+
+1 ♀
+,
+
+1 May 2008
+
+,
+Q. Wang
+leg., other data same as previous (Phi- 06,
+
+HNU
+
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+The female of this species can be easily distinguished from
+
+S. fujianensis
+
+sp. nov.
+by the oval epigynal teeth (vs triangular) and the short copulatory ducts (vs relatively long) (cf. Figs
+7 C, D
+,
+8 C
+,
+6 A, B
+,
+8 B
+).
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Habitus as in Fig.
+7 A, B
+. Total length 3.52. Carapace 1.34 long, 1.21 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances (Fig.
+7 A
+):
+AME
+0.04,
+ALE
+0.08,
+PME
+0.03,
+PLE
+0.06,
+AME
+–
+AME
+0.18,
+AME
+–
+ALE
+0.12,
+PME
+–
+PME
+0.28,
+PME
+–
+PLE
+0.2,
+AME
+–
+PME
+0.12,
+AME
+–
+PLE
+0.32,
+ALE
+–
+ALE
+0.44,
+PLE
+–
+PLE
+0.67,
+ALE
+–
+PLE
+0.15.
+MOA
+0.21 long, front width 0.25, back width 0.34. Chelicerae with three promarginal teeth and no retromarginal teeth. Leg (Fig.
+7 A, B
+) measurements: I and II missing; III 1.26 (0.42, 0.16, 0.28, 0.25, 0.15); IV 5.3 (1.82, 0.63, 1.18, 1.06, 0.61); spination: III Ti: r 2; Mt: d 1, r 1, v 8; IV Ti: v 2; Mt: r 2, v 6. Abdomen (Fig.
+7 A, B
+) 2.18 long, 0.79 wide.
+
+
+Coloration
+(Fig.
+7 A, B
+). Carapace yellow, with three pairs of stripes, each one including many black spots, laterally with dark brown stripes. Chelicerae yellowish, with sparse black spots. Endites and labium yellow, with sparse black spots. Sternum yellowish to yellow, laterally with many black dots. Legs with many small black dots. Abdomen yellowish to brown, dorsally with small dense black dots; venter with a broad brown stripe medially.
+
+
+Epigyne
+(Figs
+7 C, D
+,
+8 C
+) nearly as long as wide. Epigynal teeth lamellar, ear-shaped, located antero-laterally. Atrium moderately large, anteromedially located. Median septum narrow, anteriorly subtriangular. Copulatory openings directed laterally, located on the sides of the antero-lateral part of median septum, not covered by epigynal teeth. Glandular appendages small, mastoid like, located at the origin of the copulatory ducts, directed anterolaterally. Copulatory ducts very short, strongly bent dorsally. Spermathecae widely separated, globular, with a short stalk. Glandular mounds slightly protruding, cap-like, located on antero-lateral part of spermathecae, directed laterally. Fertilization ducts nearly as long as 1 / 2 of spermathecal width, directed antero-laterally.
+
+
+Male.
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Known from the
+type
+locality in
+Jiangxi
+, and from
+Hunan Province
+,
+China
+(Fig.
+10
+).
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The specific name comes from the Latin word
+
+perbrevis
+
+, referring to the very short copulatory ducts; adjective.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/89/D0/AF/89D0AF3C883C5D388723BC49820B552D.xml b/data/89/D0/AF/89D0AF3C883C5D388723BC49820B552D.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3b44dbaf419
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/89/D0/AF/89D0AF3C883C5D388723BC49820B552D.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,404 @@
+
+
+
+Miscellaneous notes on the systematics of and synonymy in Entiminae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yunakov, Nikolai
+0000-0002-0824-7804
+Institute of Biodiversity, NGO, 109 West Wyoming Ave., Melrose, MA 02176, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Korotyaev, Boris
+0000-0002-3492-2746
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alziar, Gabriel
+2 сité Beauséjour, 12120 Cassagnes-Bégonhès, France
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-20
+
+
+74
+
+
+2
+
+
+249
+264
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e136994
+33208AAA-4462-4248-AB0C-F6B1D46BB1DF
+
+
+
+
+
+Brachyxystus subsignatus
+Faust, 1897
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 6
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Brachyxystus subsignatus
+Faust, 1897: 356
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Proposed subspecies composition.
+
+
+
+Brachyxystus subsignatus subsignatus
+Faust, 1897: 356
+
+.
+
+
+
+=
+
+
+Polydrusus
+(
+Chaerodrys
+)
+setifrons kashmirensis
+Voss, 1959: 82
+
+
+,
+syn. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Brachyxystus subsignatus gulmargicus
+Thompson, 1977: 454
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Brachyxystus subsignatus praevius
+(
+Voss, 1959
+)
+
+,
+comb. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+Polydrusus
+(
+Chaerodrys
+)
+setifrons praevius
+Voss, 1959: 81
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+material.
+
+
+
+
+Brachyxystus subsignatus
+
+: the
+lectotype
+was designated by
+Thompson (1977)
+who noted that he had
+no
+information about the second specimen mentioned by Faust (1897). We found the second specimen in Johannes Faust’s collection and consider it the
+paralectotype
+(Fig.
+6
+);
+INDIA
+“ Khamba [= Chamba] / Andrewes ” [handwritten by J. Faust]; “ subsignat / us Fst. ” [handwritten by J. Faust]; “ Coll. J. Faust ” [yellow, printed]; “ Type ” [red, printed]; “ Staatl. Museum für / Tierkunde Dresden ”;
+
+MTD
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Brachyxystus subsignatus
+
+, paralectotype (
+MTD
+):
+A, B.
+Body dorsal and lateral view;
+C, D.
+Head dorsal and lateral view;
+E.
+Labels.
+
+
+
+
+
+Discussion.
+
+
+Eduard Voss correctly classified his taxon within the tribe
+Polydrusini
+but made an error regarding its genus and species. Upon noticing the similarity of his Kashmiri species with the Iberian
+
+Polydrusus setifrons
+, Voss
+
+did not consider comparing it with Faust’s
+
+Brachyxystus subsignatus
+
+. Consequently, he mistakenly described
+
+Brachyxystus subsignatus
+
+as
+
+Polydrusus setifrons kashmirensis
+
+.
+
+
+Despite some convergent similarity of general appearance,
+
+Polydrusus setifrons
+
+and
+
+Brachyxystus subsignatus
+
+differ significantly in the structure of the antennae, epistoma, prementum, maxilla, and genitalia of both sexes.
+
+Polydrusus setifrons
+
+is distinguished by the following characters: anterior margin of the epistoma with a fringe of tiny setae; maxilla (
+mx
+) not extending beyond hypostoma (
+hy
+); prementum (
+pr
+) large and broad; mandibular scar large (
+mn-sc
+) (Fig.
+8 G
+); antennal scape thin and long, reaching midlength of occiput, as long as funicle and club combined (Fig.
+8 E
+); stalk (
+me-sk
+) of metendosternite short, furcal arms (
+me-fa
+) bifurcate; spermatheca C-shaped, ramus vestigial (Fig.
+8 D
+); ovipositor (Fig.
+8 B, C
+) with styli (
+sty
+); median lobe long, narrow, and tubular, as long as apodemes; endophallus finely armed, without coarse spicules (Fig.
+8 A
+); and recumbent round scales have rows of papillae (Fig.
+8 H
+) between veins.
+
+
+
+On the other hand,
+
+Brachyxystus subsignatus
+
+shows significant structural affinity in the head and genitalia of both sexes with
+
+Pachyrhinus
+
+, as thoroughly examined by
+Thompson (1977)
+.
+
+
+These two species also differ in host plant preferences. Unlike
+
+Brachyxystus subsignatus
+
+, which feeds on Himalayan conifers (
+Stebbing 1911
+,
+1914
+),
+
+Polydrusus setifrons
+
+is strictly associated with Mediterranean oak forests and mixed pine-oak forests in the Iberian Peninsula. It is a known defoliator of oaks (
+
+Quercus suber
+
+and
+
+Q. ilex
+
+;
+Fagaceae
+) throughout southern
+Spain
+(
+Gallardo and Cárdenas 2017
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/AF/AE/A6/AFAEA6B81DFF5C09B4790A60039D7316.xml b/data/AF/AE/A6/AFAEA6B81DFF5C09B4790A60039D7316.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2c6ed2821f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/AF/AE/A6/AFAEA6B81DFF5C09B4790A60039D7316.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+
+
+
+First record of the family Calliopiidae (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Amphipoda) from Korean waters, with description of new species Calliopius ulleungensis sp. nov.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Kim, Kyung-Won
+0000-0003-2152-9555
+Department of Biological Sciences, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Kim, Young-Hyo
+0000-0002-7698-7919
+Department of Biological Sciences, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-20
+
+
+1221
+
+
+297
+307
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1221.139066
+D142F735-B3A8-463C-89DD-48975E019800
+
+
+
+
+Genus
+
+Calliopius
+Lilljeborg, 1865
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+species.
+
+
+
+
+Calliopius laeviusculus
+(
+Krøyer, 1838
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/D7/99/BE/D799BED4F309599992B6FEB5C5A5E938.xml b/data/D7/99/BE/D799BED4F309599992B6FEB5C5A5E938.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..474b40818f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/D7/99/BE/D799BED4F309599992B6FEB5C5A5E938.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+
+
+
+Miscellaneous notes on the systematics of and synonymy in Entiminae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yunakov, Nikolai
+0000-0002-0824-7804
+Institute of Biodiversity, NGO, 109 West Wyoming Ave., Melrose, MA 02176, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Korotyaev, Boris
+0000-0002-3492-2746
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alziar, Gabriel
+2 сité Beauséjour, 12120 Cassagnes-Bégonhès, France
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-20
+
+
+74
+
+
+2
+
+
+249
+264
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e136994
+33208AAA-4462-4248-AB0C-F6B1D46BB1DF
+
+
+
+
+
+Titinia tenuis
+(Germar, 1848)
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 3
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Merimnetes tenuis
+Germar, 1848: 220
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Myllocerus
+(
+Pseudanosimus
+)
+bacchus
+
+Voss, 1949: 75
+,
+syn. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+material.
+
+
+
+
+AUSTRALIA
+-
+
+Victoria
+
+•
+1 paratype
+; “ Bacchus / Marsh. Vict. XII. ” [blueish label, handwritten], “ Bacchus / Marsh. Vict. XII. ” [handwritten], “
+Paratypus
+/ Myllocerus / bacchus m. ” [red label], “
+Coll. E. Voss
+/ Eing. 3-75 ”;
+
+ZMH
+841041
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Myllocerus bacchus
+
+(=
+
+Titinia tenuis
+
+):
+A, B.
+Paratype, body dorsal and lateral view;
+C.
+Paratype, labels. Photo credit: by Matthias Seidel (
+ZMH
+), CC-BY 4.0;
+D.
+Map showing correction of the type locality from African Lake Victoria to Bacchus Marsh, a peri-urban town near Melbourne (Victoria, Australia).
+
+
+
+
+
+Notes.
+
+
+While studying African specimens of the genus
+
+Myllocerus
+Schoenherr, 1823
+
+from Eduard Voss’s collection in the Zoological Museum of Hamburg University, we found
+
+M. bacchus
+Voss, 1949
+
+, previously described from East Africa. However, upon closer examination of the
+paratype
+, we identified it as the South Australian
+
+Titinia tenuis
+(Germar, 1848)
+
+, uncovering a misinterpretation of the label. Eduard Voss had mistakenly assumed that “ Bacchus Marsh. Vict. ” referred to a location near Lake
+Victoria
+in Africa, when Bacchus Marsh actually is a peri-urban town near Melbourne,
+Victoria
+,
+Australia
+.
+
+Titinia tenuis
+
+is distributed in
+New South Wales
+,
+Queensland
+,
+South Australia
+, and
+Victoria
+(
+Oberprieler and Zimmerman 2020
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/F5/78/EA/F578EAB82BD4525C93143F27E2B5D664.xml b/data/F5/78/EA/F578EAB82BD4525C93143F27E2B5D664.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fd2bbf25065
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/F5/78/EA/F578EAB82BD4525C93143F27E2B5D664.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,408 @@
+
+
+
+A new genus, Sinodromus gen. nov., with two new species and the first description of the female of Philodromus guiyang Long & Yu, 2022 (Arachnida, Araneae, Philodromidae) from China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Wang, Zhong-jing
+https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6377-6840
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yao, Yan-bin
+0000-0002-2560-9299
+Jinshan College of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Tang, Zi-ying
+https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8513-456X
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Li, Wen-hui
+0000-0002-8074-9526
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Liu, Ke-ke
+0000-0001-7822-3667
+College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009, Jiangxi, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Xu, Xiang
+0000-0001-9485-5373
+College of Life Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, Hunan, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-20
+
+
+1221
+
+
+279
+296
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1221.137930
+7EE4D14C-4869-4130-ABF6-DF42B903476B
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus guiyang
+Long & Yu, 2022
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1 A – D
+,
+2 A – E
+,
+8 A
+,
+9 A, B Common name: 贵阳逍遥蛛
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus guiyang
+
+Long & Yu in
+
+Long et al. 2022: 118
+
+, figs 2 A – D, 3 A – D (
+holotype
+male from Guiyang,
+Guizhou Province
+, illustrations examined).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Additional material examined.
+
+
+
+China
+
+:
+Jiangxi Province
+•
+2 ♂
+,
+5 ♀
+, Ji’an City, Jishui County, Dadong Mountain,
+
+27 ° 15 ' 14.71 " N
+,
+115 ° 10 ' 50.50 " E
+
+,
+607 m
+a. s. l.,
+2 March 2023
+, K. Liu, Z. Jiang, Z. Deng, X. Chen leg. (20230302, Phi- 07,
+ASM-JGSU
+) •
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+, Ji’an City, Jinggangshan County Level City, Ciping Town, Jingzhu Mountain,
+
+26 ° 32 ' 45.20 " N
+,
+114 ° 06 ' 32.46 " E
+
+,
+1158 m
+a. s. l.,
+2 May 2024
+, Z. Jiang, Z. Wang leg. (20240502, Phi- 07,
+ASM-JGSU
+) •
+1 ♀
+, Ciping Town, Huangyangjie Scenic Spot,
+
+26 ° 37 ' 30.33 " N
+,
+114 ° 7 ' 8 " E
+
+,
+1384 m
+a. s. l.,
+13 August 2024
+, L. Luo, Y. Yao, Z. Wang leg. (20240813, Phi- 07,
+ASM-JGSU
+), other data same as previous •
+2 ♀
+, Shangrao City, Guangfeng District, Tongbo Mountain, Shazi Ridge,
+
+28 ° 09 ' 10.78 " N
+,
+118 ° 17 ' 41.31 " E
+
+,
+751 m
+a. s. l.,
+11 July 2023
+, K. Liu, Z. Jiang, C. Li leg. (20230711, Phi- 07,
+ASM-JGSU
+) •
+1 ♀
+, Qianshan County, Wangwu Line, Wuyishan Town, near Yu Huizhen Hope Primary School,
+
+27 ° 57 ' 05.51 " N
+,
+117 ° 49 ' 12.74 " E
+
+,
+463 m
+a. s. l.,
+9 July 2023
+(20230709, Phi- 07,
+ASM-JGSU
+), other data same as previous;
+Hunan Province
+•
+6 ♀
+, Xinning County, Bajiaozhai, Langshan, Bajiaozhai,
+
+26 ° 16. ’ 673 N,
+110 ° 44.262 ' E
+
+,
+839 m
+a. s. l.,
+22 July 2015
+, H. Yin, B. Zhou, J. Gan, Y. Gong, W. Liu, C. Zeng, Z. Chen, B. He, Y. Huang, X. Wu leg. (Phi- 07,
+
+HNU
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+The female of this species resembles that of
+
+P. subaureolus
+Bösenberg & Strand, 1906
+
+(see
+Yin et al. 2012: 1250
+, fig. 672 b, c) in having widely separated oval spermathecae, but it can be easily separated from it by the broad median septum (vs narrow) and the broad copulatory ducts (vs narrow) (Fig.
+1 C, D
+). For the male diagnosis, see
+Long et al. (2022)
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus guiyang
+Long & Yu, 2022
+
+, female
+A
+habitus, dorsal view
+B
+same, ventral view
+C
+epigyne, ventral view
+D
+vulva, dorsal view. Abbreviations: CD – copulatory duct, CO – copulatory opening, FD – fertilization duct, GA – glandular appendage, GM – glandular mound, MS – median septum, Spe – spermatheca. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (
+A, B
+); 0.1 mm (
+C, D
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Female.
+Habitus as in Figs
+1 A, B
+,
+9 A, B
+. Total length 2.95, carapace 1.24 long, 1.3 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances (Fig.
+1 A
+):
+AME
+0.06,
+ALE
+0.07,
+PME
+0.07,
+PLE
+0.08,
+AME
+–
+AME
+0.17,
+AME
+–
+ALE
+0.08,
+PME
+–
+PME
+0.31,
+PME
+–
+PLE
+0.17,
+AME
+–
+PME
+0.18,
+AME
+–
+PLE
+0.3,
+ALE
+–
+ALE
+0.3,
+PLE
+–
+PLE
+0.72,
+ALE
+–
+PLE
+0.17.
+MOA
+0.28 long, front width 0.29, back width 0.43. Chelicerae with three promarginal teeth and no retromarginal teeth. Leg measurements: I 5.42 (1.59, 0.7, 1.22, 1.08, 0.83); II 6.26 (1.86, 0.76, 1.56, 1.13, 0.95); III 4.12 (1.45, 0.32, 0.89, 0.88, 0.58); IV 4.47 (1.45, 0.48, 1.04, 0.99, 0.51); spination: I Fe: d 6; Ti: d 4, p 3, r 2, v 6; Mt: d 4, p 2, r 2, v 6; II Fe: d 4; Ti: d 4, p 2, v 6; Mt: d 4, p 4, r 3, v 6; III Fe: d 2, p 1; Ti: d 4, p 2, v 4; Mt: d 4, p 2, r 2, v 6; IV Fe: d 4, p 1; Ti: d 4, v 6; Mt: d 4, p 2, r 3, v 6. Abdomen 1.71 long, 1.12 wide.
+
+
+Coloration
+(Fig.
+1 A, B
+). Carapace white to red-brown, laterally with broad red-brown stripes. Medially with a white V-shaped mark. Chelicerae and endites yellow to brown. Labium brown. Sternum white to brown, laterally with brown spots. Legs white to dark brown, with many dark brown stripes or annulations. Abdomen white to dark brown, with many white spots and yellow muscle sigilla; venter white to yellowish.
+
+
+Epigyne
+(Figs
+1 C, D
+,
+8 A
+). Copulatory openings located at antero-lateral part of epigyne. Median septum broad, sub-posterior part slightly constricted. Copulatory ducts broad, anteriorly curved, posteriorly slightly separated. Glandular appendages slightly protruding, very small, directed laterally. Spermathecae oval, widely separated. Glandular mounds mastoid-like, located on anterolateral part of spermathecae, directed anterolaterally. Fertilization ducts long, more than 2 / 3 length of spermathecae, directed anterolaterally.
+
+
+Male.
+See
+Long et al. (2022)
+for description; habitus is shown in Fig.
+2 A, B
+and the palp is shown in Fig.
+2 C – E
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+
+This species is numerous in subtropical broad-leaved forests. The specimens were collected on shrubs and broad-leaved trees by sieving.
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Known from
+Guizhou
+(
+Long et al. 2022
+),
+Hunan
+(Fig.
+10
+), and
+Jiangxi
+(Fig.
+10
+),
+China
+. It may be broadly distributed in southern
+China
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/FC/62/F6/FC62F655F7B6504994E66BA51CB50FE9.xml b/data/FC/62/F6/FC62F655F7B6504994E66BA51CB50FE9.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..12d950837b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/FC/62/F6/FC62F655F7B6504994E66BA51CB50FE9.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+
+
+
+Miscellaneous notes on the systematics of and synonymy in Entiminae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yunakov, Nikolai
+0000-0002-0824-7804
+Institute of Biodiversity, NGO, 109 West Wyoming Ave., Melrose, MA 02176, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Korotyaev, Boris
+0000-0002-3492-2746
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alziar, Gabriel
+2 сité Beauséjour, 12120 Cassagnes-Bégonhès, France
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-12-20
+
+
+74
+
+
+2
+
+
+249
+264
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e136994
+33208AAA-4462-4248-AB0C-F6B1D46BB1DF
+
+
+
+
+
+Polydrusus
+(
+Eustolus
+)
+scapularis
+Pesarini, 1975
+
+
+
+
+
+Notes.
+
+
+Pesarini (1975) overlooked
+
+P. viridimaculatus
+Pic, 1919
+
+while describing
+
+P. scapularis
+
+, and compared his new species with
+
+Polydrusus
+(
+Poecilodrusus
+)
+elegans
+Reitter, 1887
+
+,
+
+P.
+(
+Poecilodrusus
+)
+viridicinctus
+Gyllenhal, 1834
+
+, and
+
+P. (Eurodrusus) cervinus
+(Linnaeus, 1758)
+
+, placing it in the
+
+P. cervinus
+
+species-group. The
+paratype
+of
+
+Polydrusus scapularis
+
+in the
+
+ZIN
+
+collection was examined. External morphology and the structure of aedeagus and spermatheca of
+
+Polydrusus scapularis
+
+give evidence that it is a junior synonym of
+
+P. viridimaculatus
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file