From 7eed307522d9b3e785cbcdcc3c080535c44038fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ggserver Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 19:37:54 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add updates up until 2024-11-12 19:31:48 --- .../93/2618930BFFCA0F681F90B2B0FAB5C4E7.xml | 240 +++++++ .../93/2618930BFFCD0F681D3FB409FAB5C4E7.xml | 407 ------------ .../93/2618930BFFCD0F681D3FB409FBABC340.xml | 233 +++++++ .../93/2618930BFFCE0F6F1ED8B617FDA5C2C7.xml | 170 ++--- .../93/2618930BFFD30F6C1D1BB5C1FDF2C4FD.xml | 600 +++++++++++++++++ .../93/2618930BFFD40F711ED1B26BFE3DC4A6.xml | 611 ++++++++++++++++++ .../93/2618930BFFD90F761EF6B474FDD9C301.xml | 150 +++-- .../93/2618930BFFDA0F7B1ED7B1DDFD9BC519.xml | 246 ++++--- .../93/2618930BFFDC0F781D17B4A2FBD4C0B2.xml | 547 ++++++++++++++++ 9 files changed, 2551 insertions(+), 653 deletions(-) create mode 100644 data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCA0F681F90B2B0FAB5C4E7.xml delete mode 100644 data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCD0F681D3FB409FAB5C4E7.xml create mode 100644 data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCD0F681D3FB409FBABC340.xml create mode 100644 data/26/18/93/2618930BFFD30F6C1D1BB5C1FDF2C4FD.xml create mode 100644 data/26/18/93/2618930BFFD40F711ED1B26BFE3DC4A6.xml create mode 100644 data/26/18/93/2618930BFFDC0F781D17B4A2FBD4C0B2.xml diff --git a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCA0F681F90B2B0FAB5C4E7.xml b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCA0F681F90B2B0FAB5C4E7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e06956164f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCA0F681F90B2B0FAB5C4E7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ + + + +Resurrection of Painjunirmus Ansari, 1947 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) as a subgenus of Brueelia Kéler, 1936, with description of one new species + + + +Author + +Gustafsson, Daniel R. +19BFE360-6665-4A1B-89DC-33E5D5AC6C39 +Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Zoology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. +kotatsu@fripost.org + + + +Author + +Bush, Sarah E. +87DAE296-C04F-4DA5-82A9-AC2715A065F8 +School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. +bush@biology.utah.edu + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2024 + +2024-11-07 + + +968 + + +174 +199 + + + + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2727/12527 + +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2727 +2118-9773 +14100656 +6E04160B-9B4D-4D93-BE81-E37D2253FDB1 + + + + + +Key to the species of + +Brueelia (Painjunirmus) +Ansari, 1947 + + + + + + +Note that the species + +Br. +( +Painjunirmus +) +parva +( +Mey, 2017 +) + +is not included in this key, as the original description, illustration and photos are inadequate to compare it with other species in this subgenus, and its relationship to +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +) is unclear. + + + + + + + +1. Male tergopleurite III with +aps +( +Fig. 9 +); proximal mesosome wider than long ( +Fig. 14 +); female vulval margin with more than 5 +vss +( +Fig. 16 +) ..................................................................................... ........................................................................ + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +brevipennis + +( +Ansari, 1956 +) + + + + + +– Male tergopleurite III without +aps +; proximal mesosome longer than wide; female vulval margin with 5 +vss +or fewer .................................................................................................................................... 2 + + + + + + +2. Male tergopleurite V with at least 1 +tps +( +Fig. 17 +); proximal mesosome elongated, pointed ( +Fig. 22 +) ............................................................................... + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +pengya + +( +Ansari, 1947 +) + +. + + + + +– Male tergopleurite V without +tps +; proximal mesosome more or less rectangular ............................ 3 + + + + + + +3. Sternal plates with lateral extensions, more prominent in male ( +Fig. 1 +) than in female ( +Fig. 2 +); vulval margin with median bulge ( +Fig. 8 +) ....................... + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +chilchil + +( +Ansari, 1955 +) + + + + +– Sternal plates without lateral extensions (but may have concave lateral margins); vulval margin gently rounded .................................................................................................................................. 4 + + + + + +4. Male abdominal segments III–V with 2 +ps +on each side ( +Fig. 33 +); shape of male mesosome as in +Fig. 38 +; shape of female subgenital plate as in +Fig. 40 +....................................................................... .............................................................................. + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +magnini + +( +Ansari, 1956 +) + + + + + +– Male abdominal segments III–V with 3 +ps +on each side ( +Fig. 25 +); shape of male mesosome as in +Fig. 30 +; shape of female subgenital plate as in +Fig. 32 +......... + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +alba + + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCD0F681D3FB409FAB5C4E7.xml b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCD0F681D3FB409FAB5C4E7.xml deleted file mode 100644 index d4c6b3b7a62..00000000000 --- a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCD0F681D3FB409FAB5C4E7.xml +++ /dev/null @@ -1,407 +0,0 @@ - - - -Resurrection of Painjunirmus Ansari, 1947 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) as a subgenus of Brueelia Kéler, 1936, with description of one new species - - - -Author - -Gustafsson, Daniel R. -kotatsu@fripost.org - - - -Author - -Bush, Sarah E. -87DAE296-C04F-4DA5-82A9-AC2715A065F8 -School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. -bush@biology.utah.edu - -text - - -European Journal of Taxonomy - - -2024 - -2024-11-07 - - -968 - - -174 -199 - - - - -https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2727/12527 - -journal article -10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2727 -2118-9773 -14100656 -6E04160B-9B4D-4D93-BE81-E37D2253FDB1 - - - - - - - -Brueelia -( -Painjunirmus -) -parva - -( -Mey, 2017 -) - - - - - - - - - -Garrulaxeus parvus -Mey, 2017: 164–165 - - -, fig. 88, pl. XVI fig. 1. - - - - - -Brueelia parva - -– - - -Gustafsson -et al. -2019d: 273 - - -. - - - - - - - -Type -host - - - - - -Argya gularis -(Blyth, 1855) - -– white-throated babbler. - - - - -Type -locality - - - - -Thityapante, -50 km -S of -Magwe -, -Myanmar -. - - - - - -Remarks - - - -The placement of - -Garrulaxeus parvus -Mey, 2017 - -, in -Br. -( - -Painjunirmus - -) is based on the photo provided with the original description, which is compatible with -Br. -( - -Painjunirmus - -). The photo provided by -Mey (2017) -lacks detail on important characters such as the preantennal structure, head, leg and abdominal chaetotaxy, and the structure of the male genitalia. In the photo this species appears to have -aps -on tergopleurites III–IV, similar to - -Br. brevipennis -, - -but unlike this species, - -Br. parva - -also appear to have -psps -on tergopleurite IV; other chaetotaxy cannot be assessed accurately, as it is not clear which are dorsal and which are ventral setae in the photo. If the minute setae seen centrally on segments II–VI are -ss -, this would indicate that this species may belong to some subgenus of - -Priceiella - -. It is thus possible that - -Garrulaxeus parvus - -does not belong in -Br. -( - -Painjunirmus - -), but a complete redescription is necessary before this species can be accurately placed and compared to other species in the - -Brueelia - --complex. - - -It should be noted that the male genitalia of this species, as illustrated by -Mey (2017) -, are difficult to homologize to any genus of the - -Brueelia - --complex, as they are illustrated in the everted position, and the mesosome appears severely distorted. The parameral heads do not appear to be folded medianly in this species, and the distal mesosome appears to be dominated by paired, roughly rectangular, nodi, which may represent the mesosomal lobes. However, the rest of the mesosome is difficult to reconcile with the morphology of any - -Brueelia - --complex genus known from babblers, and it is possible that the illustrated genitalia are too distorted to be adequately compared. No other illustrations were provided by -Mey (2017) -, and the description includes no characters that are useful for placing this species in any genus. The female of this species is unknown. - - -Attempts to communicate with Mey about the species described in his 2017 paper, have been unanswered, and we have thus not been able to examine the -holotype -of - -Garrulaxeus parvus - -. Based on what can be seen in Mey’s photo of the whole body of the male, - -Garrulaxeus parvus - -may be separated from all other species of -Br. -( - -Painjunirmus - -) by the relatively broad and short preantennal area. - - - -Key to the species of - -Brueelia (Painjunirmus) -Ansari, 1947 - - - - -Note that the species - -Br. -( -Painjunirmus -) -parva -( -Mey, 2017 -) - -is not included in this key, as the original description, illustration and photos are inadequate to compare it with other species in this subgenus, and its relationship to -Br. -( - -Painjunirmus - -) is unclear. - - - - - - - -1. Male tergopleurite III with -aps -( -Fig. 9 -); proximal mesosome wider than long ( -Fig. 14 -); female vulval margin with more than 5 -vss -( -Fig. 16 -) ..................................................................................... ........................................................................ - - -Brueelia -( -Painjunirmus -) -brevipennis - -(Ansari, 1956) - - - - - -– Male tergopleurite III without -aps -; proximal mesosome longer than wide; female vulval margin with 5 -vss -or fewer .................................................................................................................................... 2 - - - - - - -2. Male tergopleurite V with at least 1 -tps -( -Fig. 17 -); proximal mesosome elongated, pointed ( -Fig. 22 -) ............................................................................... - - -Brueelia -( -Painjunirmus -) -pengya - -( -Ansari, 1947 -) - -. - - - - -– Male tergopleurite V without -tps -; proximal mesosome more or less rectangular ............................ 3 - - - - - - -3. Sternal plates with lateral extensions, more prominent in male ( -Fig. 1 -) than in female ( -Fig. 2 -); vulval margin with median bulge ( -Fig. 8 -) ....................... - - -Brueelia -( -Painjunirmus -) -chilchil - -( -Ansari, 1955 -) - - - - -– Sternal plates without lateral extensions (but may have concave lateral margins); vulval margin gently rounded .................................................................................................................................. 4 - - - - - -4. Male abdominal segments III–V with 2 -ps -on each side ( -Fig. 33 -); shape of male mesosome as in -Fig. 38 -; shape of female subgenital plate as in -Fig. 40 -....................................................................... .............................................................................. - - -Brueelia -( -Painjunirmus -) -magnini - -(Ansari, 1956) - - - - - -– Male abdominal segments III–V with 3 -ps -on each side ( -Fig. 25 -); shape of male mesosome as in -Fig. 30 -; shape of female subgenital plate as in -Fig. 32 -......... - - -Brueelia -( -Painjunirmus -) -alba - - -sp. nov. - - - - - - - \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCD0F681D3FB409FBABC340.xml b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCD0F681D3FB409FBABC340.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e53a13dbb5b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCD0F681D3FB409FBABC340.xml @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ + + + +Resurrection of Painjunirmus Ansari, 1947 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) as a subgenus of Brueelia Kéler, 1936, with description of one new species + + + +Author + +Gustafsson, Daniel R. +19BFE360-6665-4A1B-89DC-33E5D5AC6C39 +Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Zoology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. +kotatsu@fripost.org + + + +Author + +Bush, Sarah E. +87DAE296-C04F-4DA5-82A9-AC2715A065F8 +School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. +bush@biology.utah.edu + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2024 + +2024-11-07 + + +968 + + +174 +199 + + + + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2727/12527 + +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2727 +2118-9773 +14100656 +6E04160B-9B4D-4D93-BE81-E37D2253FDB1 + + + + + + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +parva + +( +Mey, 2017 +) + + + + + + + + + +Garrulaxeus parvus +Mey, 2017: 164–165 + + +, fig. 88, pl. XVI fig. 1. + + + + + +Brueelia parva + +– + + +Gustafsson +et al. +2019d: 273 + + +. + + + + + + + +Type +host + + + + + +Argya gularis +(Blyth, 1855) + +– white-throated babbler. + + + + + + +Type +locality + + + + +Thityapante, +50 km +S of +Magwe +, +Myanmar +. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +The placement of + +Garrulaxeus parvus +Mey, 2017 + +, in +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +) is based on the photo provided with the original description, which is compatible with +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +). The photo provided by +Mey (2017) +lacks detail on important characters such as the preantennal structure, head, leg and abdominal chaetotaxy, and the structure of the male genitalia. In the photo this species appears to have +aps +on tergopleurites III–IV, similar to + +Br. brevipennis +, + +but unlike this species, + +Br. parva + +also appear to have +psps +on tergopleurite IV; other chaetotaxy cannot be assessed accurately, as it is not clear which are dorsal and which are ventral setae in the photo. If the minute setae seen centrally on segments II–VI are +ss +, this would indicate that this species may belong to some subgenus of + +Priceiella + +. It is thus possible that + +Garrulaxeus parvus + +does not belong in +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +), but a complete redescription is necessary before this species can be accurately placed and compared to other species in the + +Brueelia + +-complex. + + +It should be noted that the male genitalia of this species, as illustrated by +Mey (2017) +, are difficult to homologize to any genus of the + +Brueelia + +-complex, as they are illustrated in the everted position, and the mesosome appears severely distorted. The parameral heads do not appear to be folded medianly in this species, and the distal mesosome appears to be dominated by paired, roughly rectangular, nodi, which may represent the mesosomal lobes. However, the rest of the mesosome is difficult to reconcile with the morphology of any + +Brueelia + +-complex genus known from babblers, and it is possible that the illustrated genitalia are too distorted to be adequately compared. No other illustrations were provided by +Mey (2017) +, and the description includes no characters that are useful for placing this species in any genus. The female of this species is unknown. + + +Attempts to communicate with Mey about the species described in his 2017 paper, have been unanswered, and we have thus not been able to examine the +holotype +of + +Garrulaxeus parvus + +. Based on what can be seen in Mey’s photo of the whole body of the male, + +Garrulaxeus parvus + +may be separated from all other species of +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +) by the relatively broad and short preantennal area. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCE0F6F1ED8B617FDA5C2C7.xml b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCE0F6F1ED8B617FDA5C2C7.xml index baed000ff45..562cd9df0a7 100644 --- a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCE0F6F1ED8B617FDA5C2C7.xml +++ b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFCE0F6F1ED8B617FDA5C2C7.xml @@ -1,51 +1,53 @@ - - - -Resurrection of Painjunirmus Ansari, 1947 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) as a subgenus of Brueelia Kéler, 1936, with description of one new species + + + +Resurrection of Painjunirmus Ansari, 1947 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) as a subgenus of Brueelia Kéler, 1936, with description of one new species - - -Author + + +Author -Gustafsson, Daniel R. -kotatsu@fripost.org +Gustafsson, Daniel R. +19BFE360-6665-4A1B-89DC-33E5D5AC6C39 +Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Zoology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. +kotatsu@fripost.org - - -Author + + +Author -Bush, Sarah E. -87DAE296-C04F-4DA5-82A9-AC2715A065F8 -School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. -bush@biology.utah.edu +Bush, Sarah E. +87DAE296-C04F-4DA5-82A9-AC2715A065F8 +School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. +bush@biology.utah.edu -text - - -European Journal of Taxonomy +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy - -2024 - -2024-11-07 + +2024 + +2024-11-07 - -968 + +968 - -174 -199 + +174 +199 - -https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2727/12527 + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2727/12527 -journal article -10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2727 -2118-9773 -14100656 -6E04160B-9B4D-4D93-BE81-E37D2253FDB1 +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2727 +2118-9773 +14100656 +6E04160B-9B4D-4D93-BE81-E37D2253FDB1 @@ -59,7 +61,9 @@ ) magnini -(Ansari, 1956) +( +Ansari, 1956 +) @@ -75,7 +79,7 @@ Brueelia magnini -Ansari, 1956a: 161 +Ansari, 1956a: 161 , figs 67–70. @@ -88,7 +92,7 @@ – - + Price et al . 2003: 156 @@ -96,72 +100,79 @@ Price . — -Gustafsson & Bush 2017: 40 +Gustafsson & Bush 2017: 40 . — -Mey 2017: 158 +Mey 2017: 158 . - + Type material - + + Holotype - - SUDAN • ♂ ; -Dec. 1947 + +Dec. 1947 + ; -R -. Meinertzhagen leg., ex +R. Meinertzhagen +leg., ex + Argya fulva acaciae ( -Lichtenstein, 1823 +Lichtenstein, 1823 ) [as Turdoides fulvus acaciae -]; 17066–17068; -NHMUK -010670707; -NHMUK +] + +; 17066–17068; +NHMUK010670707 +; +NHMUK + . - + + Allotype - - SUDAN • ♀ -; same data as for -holotype -; 17066–17068; -NHMUK -010670707; -NHMUK -. +; same data as for holotype; 17066–17068; +NHMUK010670707 +; +NHMUK +. + + + + Paratypes (ex + Argya fulva acaciae @@ -169,10 +180,9 @@ Price Turdoides fulvus acaciae -]) - - - +] + +) SUDAN • 6 ♂♂ @@ -183,7 +193,7 @@ Price , NHMUK010708922 ; -NHMUK +NHMUK . @@ -193,7 +203,7 @@ Price - + SUDAN • 4 ♂♂ @@ -202,10 +212,12 @@ Price ; same data as for holotype; 17066–17068; NHMUK010709541 ; -NHMUK +NHMUK . + + Type host @@ -215,21 +227,23 @@ Price Argya fulva acaciae ( -Lichtenstein, 1823 +Lichtenstein, 1823 ) – fulvous chatterer. + + Type locality - + Sudan -. -Description +. + Figs 33–34. @@ -239,7 +253,7 @@ Price Painjunirmus ) magnini -Ansari, 1956 +Ansari, 1956 . 33 @@ -248,6 +262,10 @@ Ansari, 1956 . ♀, habitus, dorsal and ventral views. + + +Description + Both sexes @@ -269,7 +287,7 @@ Head convex dome-shaped ( Painjunirmus ) magnini -Ansari, 1956a +Ansari, 1956a . 35 diff --git a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFD30F6C1D1BB5C1FDF2C4FD.xml b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFD30F6C1D1BB5C1FDF2C4FD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c6934c6491a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFD30F6C1D1BB5C1FDF2C4FD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,600 @@ + + + +Resurrection of Painjunirmus Ansari, 1947 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) as a subgenus of Brueelia Kéler, 1936, with description of one new species + + + +Author + +Gustafsson, Daniel R. +19BFE360-6665-4A1B-89DC-33E5D5AC6C39 +Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Zoology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. +kotatsu@fripost.org + + + +Author + +Bush, Sarah E. +87DAE296-C04F-4DA5-82A9-AC2715A065F8 +School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. +bush@biology.utah.edu + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2024 + +2024-11-07 + + +968 + + +174 +199 + + + + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2727/12527 + +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2727 +2118-9773 +14100656 +6E04160B-9B4D-4D93-BE81-E37D2253FDB1 + + + + + + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +alba + + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +EBA67F37-C773-48C5-A8AB-E1AEA64A4B7A + + + +Figs 25–32 + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +alba + +sp. nov. +is most similar to + +Br. +( +P. +) +chilchil + +, and + +Br. +( +P. +) +magnini + +, with which it shares the following characters: +aps +absent from male tergopleurite III ( +Figs 1 +, +25 +, +33 +) and proximal mesosome slender and more or less rectangular ( +Figs 6 +, +30 +, +38 +). + + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +alba + +sp. nov. +is separated from + +Br. +( +P. +) +chilchil + +on the following characters: sternal plates not modified laterally in + +Br. +( +P. +) +alba + +( +Figs 25–26 +), but modified in + +Br. +( +P. +) +chilchil + +( +Figs 1–2 +); lateral margins of mesosome distally convergent in + +Br. +( +P. +) +alba + +( +Fig. 30 +), but near-parallel in + +Br. +( +P. +) +chilchil + +( +Fig. 6 +); parameres much more slender in + +Br. +( +P. +) +alba + +( +Fig. 31 +) than in + +Br. +( +P. +) +chilchil + +( +Fig. 7 +); basal apodeme slender in + +Br. +( +P. +) +alba + +( +Fig. 29 +), but broader in + +Br. +( +P. +) +chilchil + +( +Fig. 5 +); vulval margin gently rounded in + +Br. +( +P. +) +alba + +( +Fig. 32 +), but with median bulge in + +Br. +( +P. +) +chilchil + +( +Fig. 8 +). + + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +alba + +sp. nov. +is separated from + +Br. +( +P. +) +magnini + +on the following characters: male abdominal segments III–V with 3 +ps +on each side in + +Br. +( +P. +) +alba + +( +Fig. 25 +), but 2 +ps +on each side in + +Br. +( +P. +) +magnini + +( +Fig. 33 +); proximal mesosome smaller in + +Br. +( +P. +) +alba + +( +Fig. 30 +) than in + +Br. +( +P. +) +magnini + +( +Fig. 38 +); female subgenital plate roughly quadratic in + +Br. +( +P. +) +alba + +( +Fig. 32 +), but more trapezoidal in + +Br. +( +P. +) +magnini + +( +Fig. 40 +). + + + + + +Etymology + + + +The species epithet is derived from the Latin + +‘ +alba + +’ for ‘white +’ +, referring to the near-complete lack of pigmentation in this species. + + + + + +Type material + + + + + +Holotype + +NEPAL +• +♂ +; + +Mar. 1937 + +; +R, Meinertzhagen +leg.; ex + + +Argya striata striata +( +Dumont, 1823 +) + +[as + +Turdoides terricolor terricolor + +] + +; 9339; +NHMUK010709544 +; +NHMUK + +. + + + +Figs 25–26. + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +alba + +sp. nov. +25 +. Holotype, ♂ (NHMUK010709544), habitus, dorsal and ventral views. +26. +Paratype, ♀ (NHMUK010709545), habitus, dorsal and ventral views. + + + + + +Paratypes + +NEPAL +• +3 ♀♀ +; same data as for holotype; 9339–40; +NHMUK010709545 +; +NHMUK + +. + + + + + +Type host + + + + +Argya striata striata +( +Dumont, 1823 +) + +– jungle babbler. + + + + + +Type locality + + + +Nepal +. + + + + + +Description + + + +Both sexes + + +Head convex dome-shaped ( +Fig. 27 +), lateral margins of preantennal area slightly convex, frons shallowly concave. Marginal carina deeply displaced and much widened at osculum, lateral sections slender with slightly irregular median margins. Ventral anterior plate not visible. Head chaetotaxy as in +Fig. 27 +. Extent of head pigmentation as delimited by thin dotted line in +Fig. 27 +, interior of preantennal nodi unpigmented. Thoracic and abdominal segments as in +Figs 25–26 +; proepimera with light brown pigmentation; metepisterna, metasternum, and anterior and posterior sections of sternal plates with very faint brown pigmentation. + + + +Figs 27–32. + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +alba + +sp. nov. +27, 29–31 +. Holotype, ♂ (NHMUK010709544). +28, 32 +. Paratype, ♀ (NHMUK010709545). +27 +. Head, dorsal and ventral views. +28 +. Antenna, ventral side. +29 +. Genitalia, dorsal view. +30 +. Mesosome, ventral view. +31 +. Paramere, dorsal view. +32 +. Subgenital plate and vulval margin, ventral view. + + + +Male + + +Scape as in +Fig. 27 +. Distal abdomen destroyed during mounting of single examined male, and not illustrated. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in +Fig. 25 +; +aps +absent from tergopleurite III; +tps +present on tergopleurites VI–VII; 3 +ps +on each side of segments III–V and VII, 2 +ps +on each side of segment VI. Sternal plates without lateral extensions. Subgenital plate with very pale brown pigmentation in anterior end, distal end missing in specimen. Basal apodeme long and slender ( +Fig. 29 +). Proximal mesosome short, roughly rectangular ( +Fig. 30 +). Lateral margins of mesosomal lobes convergent distally, antero-lateral horns short, more or less straight. Rugose area of distal mesosome extensive; +pmes +as in +Fig. 30 +. Gonopore small, distal margin deeply concave; +ames +as in +Fig. 30 +. Parameres slender, much elongated; +pst1–2 +as in +Fig. 31. + + +MEASUREMENTS +(n = 1). HL = 0.36; HW = 0.31; PRW = 0.20; PTW = 0.33; AW = 0.49. + + +Female + + +Scape as in +Fig. 28 +. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in +Fig. 26 +; segment II with 2 +ps +on each side, segments III–VIII with 3 +ps +on each side. Sternal plates without lateral extensions. Subgenital plate with very faint brown pigmentation in anterior end, but posterior limit of pigmentation diffuse and not illustrated; plate moderately broad, with broad connection to cross-piece ( +Fig. 32 +). Vulval margin gently rounded to slightly flattened medianly ( +Fig. 32 +), with 3 short, slender +vms +and 3–5 short, thorn-like +vss +on each side; 4 short, slender +vos +on each side of subgenital plate; distal 1 +vos +median to +vss +. + + +MEASUREMENTS +(n = 3). TL = 1.80–2.01; HL = 0.41; HW = 0.34–0.36; PRW = 0.21–0.22; PTW = 0.34– 0.36; AW = 0.56–0.60. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +The occurrence of two different species of + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) + +on + +Turdoides striata + +in different parts of its range may indicate that these species are geographically limited. No detailed collection locality is given on the +type +slides, and more collections are needed to establish whether + +Br. +( +P. +) +alba + +sp. nov. +is more widely distributed. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFD40F711ED1B26BFE3DC4A6.xml b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFD40F711ED1B26BFE3DC4A6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0c13a4fa60d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFD40F711ED1B26BFE3DC4A6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,611 @@ + + + +Resurrection of Painjunirmus Ansari, 1947 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) as a subgenus of Brueelia Kéler, 1936, with description of one new species + + + +Author + +Gustafsson, Daniel R. +19BFE360-6665-4A1B-89DC-33E5D5AC6C39 +Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Zoology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. +kotatsu@fripost.org + + + +Author + +Bush, Sarah E. +87DAE296-C04F-4DA5-82A9-AC2715A065F8 +School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. +bush@biology.utah.edu + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2024 + +2024-11-07 + + +968 + + +174 +199 + + + + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2727/12527 + +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2727 +2118-9773 +14100656 +6E04160B-9B4D-4D93-BE81-E37D2253FDB1 + + + + + + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +pengya + +( +Ansari, 1947 +) + + + + + + +Figs 17–24 + + + + + + + +Painjunirmus pengya +Ansari, 1947: 285–287 + + +, fig. 10. + + + + + +Brueelia pengya + +– + +Hopkins & Clay 1952: 60 + +. — + +Ansari 1956a: 157–158 + +, figs 48–54. — + + +Price +et al +. 2003: 157 + + +.— + +Gustafsson & Bush 2017: 40 + +.— + +Mey 2017: 156–158 + +, fig. 80. + + + + + + +Type material + + + + + +Holotype + +PAKISTAN +• +1 ♀ +; +Faisalabad +[as Lyallpur, +Punjab +, India]; + +16 Mar. 1932 + +; ex + + +Argya striata sindiana +( +Ticehurst, 1920 +) + +[as + +Turdoides terricolor terricolor + +] + +; Brit. Mus. 1953-2; +NHMUK010670844 +; +NHMUK + +. + + + + +Allotype + +PAKISTAN +• +♂ +; same data as for holotype; Brit. Mus. 1953-2; +NHMUK010670844 +; +NHMUK +. + + + + + +Paratypes + +PAKISTAN +• +2 ♂♂ +, +1 ♀ +; same data as for holotype; Brit. Mus. 1953-2; +NHMUK010670844 +; +NHMUK + +. + + +Other material examined + + + +INDIA +• +2 ♀♀ +; +Lucknow +[ +Uttar Pradesh +]; ex + + +A. striata somervillei +( +Sykes, 1832 +) + +[as + +Turdoides somervillei + +] + +; Brit. Mus. 1951-444; +NHMUK010709548 +; +NHMUK +. + + + +LOCALITY UNKNOWN • + +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +; ex + + +A. striata somervillei + +[as + +Turdoides somervillei + +] + +; +NHMUK010709060–1 +; +NHMUK + +. + + + + + +Type host + + + + +Argya striata sindiana +( +Ticehurst, 1920 +) + +– jungle babbler. + + + + + +Type locality + + + +Faisalabad, +Pakistan +. + + + + + +Other hosts + + + + +Argya striata somervillei +( +Sykes, 1832 +) + +. + +Argya striata +( +Dumont, 1823 +) + +. + + + + + +Description + + + +Both sexes + + +Head convex dome-shaped ( +Fig. 19 +), lateral margins of preantennal area convex, frons shallowly concave. Marginal carina moderately displaced and much widened at osculum; lateral sections slender, with slightly irregular median margins. Ventral anterior plate not visible. Head chaetotaxy as in +Fig. 19 +; dorsal post-antennal setae and sensilla not visible, but presumably same as in other species of + +Painjunirmus + +. Extent of head pigmentation as in +Fig. 19 +, limited to lateral margins of head. Thoracic and abdominal segments as in +Figs 17–18 +; proepimera, metepisterna, lateral margins of tergopleurites, and sternal plates with medium brown pigmentation; pigmentation of sternal plates paler medianly than laterally. + + +Male + + +Scape as in +Fig. 19 +. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in +Fig. 17 +; +aps +absent from tergopleurite III; +tps +present on tergopleurites V–VIII; 2 +ps +on each side of segments III–V and VII, 3 +ps +one ach side of segment VI. Sternal plates without lateral extensions. Subgenital plate with dark pigmentation only on anterior margin, darker laterally than medianly. Basal apodeme broad, short, constricted at mid-length ( +Fig. 21 +). Proximal mesosome elongated, pointed ( +Fig. 22 +). Mesosomal lobes with near-parallel lateral margins distally, antero-lateral horns slender, more or less straight. Rugose area of mesosomal lobes limited to distal margin; +pmes +as in +Fig. 22 +. Gonopore broad, crescent-shaped, distal margin deeply concave; +ames +as in +Fig. 22 +; penile arms short, not reaching distal margin of mesosomal lobes. Parameres slender, much elongated; +pst1–2 +as in +Fig. 23. + + + +Figs 17–18. + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +pengya +( +Ansari, 1947 +) + +. +17 +. ♂, habitus, dorsal and ventral views. +18 +. ♀, habitus, dorsal and ventral views. + + + +MEASUREMENTS +(n = 1). TL = 1.39; HL = 0.38; HW = 0.32; PRW = 0.21; PTW = 0.34; AW = 0.49. + + +Female + + +Scape as in +Fig. 20 +. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in +Fig. 18 +; segments III–VIII with 3 +ps +on each side. Sternal plates without lateral extensions. Subgenital plate broad, with broad connection to cross-piece ( +Fig. 24 +). Vulval margin gently rounded ( +Fig. 24 +), with 4 short, slender +vms +and 4–5 short, thorn-like +vss +on each side; 4–5 short, slender +vos +one each side of subgenital plate; distal 1 +vos +median to +vss +. + + +MEASUREMENTS +(n = 3). TL = 1.73–1.79; HL = 0.39–0.44; HW = 0.35–0.37; PRW = 0.21–0.23; PTW = 0.35–0.38; AW = 0.49–0.58. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +Mey (2017) +discussed the complicated publication history of + +Painjunirmus pengya + +, inherited from Ansari’s habit of redescribing the same species as new, often several times, in separate publications, and sometimes referring to clearly different species belonging to different genera (see + +Naz +et al. +2020 + +for an example). As a large number of Ansari’s +types +are missing ( + +Naz +et al. +2020 + +), and his published illustrations are often partial or include setae transposed from ventral to dorsal sides, identification of species described by Ansari necessarily include a degree of imagination. + + + +Figs 19–24. + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +pengya +( +Ansari, 1947 +) + +. +19 +. ♂, head, dorsal and ventral views. +20 +. ♀, antenna, ventral side. +21 +. ♂, genitalia, dorsal view. +22 +. ♂, mesosome, ventral view. +23 +. ♂, paramere, dorsal view. +24 +. ♀, subgenital plate and vulval margin, ventral view. + + + +Mey (2017) +argued both that the host associations of + +P. pengya + +are doubtful, and that this species may be a synonym of either + +Brueelia mahrastan +Ansari, 1956 + +, or + +Brueelia chilchil +Ansari, 1955 + +. As + +Brueelia mahrastan + +is today placed in the genus + +Priceiella +Gustafsson & Bush, 2017 + +, and + +P. pengya +sensu +Ansari, 1947 + +, is clearly not a member of this genus, they cannot be synonyms. As the +holotype +is also different from the potential type specimens of + +B. chilchil + +we have examined, including the +neotype +(see above), we also reject the suggestion that + +P. pengya + +is a synonym of + +B. chilchil + +. + + +We agree with +Mey (2017) +that there are definitely differences in the illustrations of + +P. pengya + +between +Ansari (1947) +and +Ansari (1956a) +; for instance, the abdominal chaetotaxy of the male does not include any +tps +or +ss +in the illustrations of +Ansari 1947 +, but include them in the illustrations of +Ansari 1956a +; notably, in both illustrations the +sts +appear to have been transposed to the dorsal side. Neither of these illustrations have the same chaetotaxy as that illustrated here, which corresponds to the chaetotaxy of the +allotype +(but is based on the non-type male; +Fig. 17 +). There are also differences in the shape of the male genitalia, but not necessarily in the structure, although detail is too scant to be sure. As these drawings are made by different people (see signatures on plates), and possibly based on different specimens, the differences are here not considered significant; however, we hope that the illustrations and description of this species provided here will be able to replace these older illustrations. + + +Concerning the doubtful host association, +Mey (2017) +based this primarily on the idea that “it is hard to believe that these two host species [ + +Turdoides striata + +and + +Turdoides caudata + +, the originally given host species of + +P. pengya + +] are parasitized by the same louse species in nature” ( +Mey 2017: 156 +; our translation). This is common throughout the + +Brueelia + +-complex ( +Gustafsson & Bush 2017 +), but does not appear to be the case here: specimens from other + +T. striata + +are conspecific with the types of + +P. pengya + +, whereas specimens from + +T. caudata + +represent a different species ( + +B. chilchil + +). Different louse species thus parasitize on different host species in this case, but there seem to be no reason to doubt that Ansari’s host associations are erroneous. The +neotype +designation of + +B. chilchil + +above should put this matter to rest. + + +Note that specimens we have seen from + +T. striata + +from +Nepal +do not represent + +P. pengya + +and are here described as a new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFD90F761EF6B474FDD9C301.xml b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFD90F761EF6B474FDD9C301.xml index 203a0c0521a..3bb1db9ae71 100644 --- a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFD90F761EF6B474FDD9C301.xml +++ b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFD90F761EF6B474FDD9C301.xml @@ -1,51 +1,53 @@ - - - -Resurrection of Painjunirmus Ansari, 1947 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) as a subgenus of Brueelia Kéler, 1936, with description of one new species + + + +Resurrection of Painjunirmus Ansari, 1947 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) as a subgenus of Brueelia Kéler, 1936, with description of one new species - - -Author + + +Author -Gustafsson, Daniel R. -kotatsu@fripost.org +Gustafsson, Daniel R. +19BFE360-6665-4A1B-89DC-33E5D5AC6C39 +Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Zoology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. +kotatsu@fripost.org - - -Author + + +Author -Bush, Sarah E. -87DAE296-C04F-4DA5-82A9-AC2715A065F8 -School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. -bush@biology.utah.edu +Bush, Sarah E. +87DAE296-C04F-4DA5-82A9-AC2715A065F8 +School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. +bush@biology.utah.edu -text - - -European Journal of Taxonomy +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy - -2024 - -2024-11-07 + +2024 + +2024-11-07 - -968 + +968 - -174 -199 + +174 +199 - -https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2727/12527 + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2727/12527 -journal article -10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2727 -2118-9773 -14100656 -6E04160B-9B4D-4D93-BE81-E37D2253FDB1 +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2727 +2118-9773 +14100656 +6E04160B-9B4D-4D93-BE81-E37D2253FDB1 @@ -60,7 +62,7 @@ brevipennis ( -Ansari, 1956a +Ansari, 1956a ) @@ -77,7 +79,7 @@ Brueelia brevipennis -Ansari, 1956a: 159 +Ansari, 1956a: 159 , figs 60–62. @@ -90,7 +92,7 @@ – - + Price et al . 2003: 153 @@ -98,38 +100,44 @@ Price . — -Gustafsson & Bush 2017: 37–38 +Gustafsson & Bush 2017: 37–38 . — -Mey 2017: 157 +Mey 2017: 157 . - + Type material - + + Holotype - - PALESTINE • ♂ -; Jericho; -24 Nov. 1922 -; P.A. Buxton leg.; ex +; +Jericho +; + +24 Nov. 1922 + +; +P.A. Buxton +leg.; ex + Argya squamiceps squamiceps ( -Cretzschmar, 1826 +Cretzschmar, 1826 ) [as @@ -137,26 +145,27 @@ Price Argya squamiceps (Cretzschmar, 1827) -]; -NHMUK -010670537; -NHMUK +] + +; +NHMUK010670537 +; +NHMUK + . - + + Paratypes - - - PALESTINE • 2 ♂♂ ; same data as for holotype; NHMUK010708240–1 ; -NHMUK +NHMUK . @@ -166,19 +175,22 @@ Price - + ISRAEL • 1 ♂ , 1 ♀ ; -Masada -[as Metzada]; +Masada +[as +Metzada +]; 2 May 1958 ; ex + Argya squamiceps squamiceps @@ -186,13 +198,17 @@ Price Argya squamiceps -]; 326, Brit. Mus. 1958-520; +] + +; 326, Brit. Mus. 1958-520; NHMUK010708242 ; -NHMUK +NHMUK . + + Type host @@ -202,11 +218,13 @@ Price Argya squamiceps squamiceps ( -Cretzschmar, 1826 +Cretzschmar, 1826 ) – Arabian babbler. + + Type locality @@ -276,7 +294,7 @@ as in Painjunirmus ) brevipennis -Ansari, 1956 +Ansari, 1956 . 9 @@ -322,7 +340,7 @@ median to Painjunirmus ) brevipennis -Ansari, 1956 +Ansari, 1956 . 11, 13–15 diff --git a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFDA0F7B1ED7B1DDFD9BC519.xml b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFDA0F7B1ED7B1DDFD9BC519.xml index 296043a4dbd..4971c3647d8 100644 --- a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFDA0F7B1ED7B1DDFD9BC519.xml +++ b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFDA0F7B1ED7B1DDFD9BC519.xml @@ -1,51 +1,53 @@ - - - -Resurrection of Painjunirmus Ansari, 1947 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) as a subgenus of Brueelia Kéler, 1936, with description of one new species + + + +Resurrection of Painjunirmus Ansari, 1947 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) as a subgenus of Brueelia Kéler, 1936, with description of one new species - - -Author + + +Author -Gustafsson, Daniel R. -kotatsu@fripost.org +Gustafsson, Daniel R. +19BFE360-6665-4A1B-89DC-33E5D5AC6C39 +Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Zoology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. +kotatsu@fripost.org - - -Author + + +Author -Bush, Sarah E. -87DAE296-C04F-4DA5-82A9-AC2715A065F8 -School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. -bush@biology.utah.edu +Bush, Sarah E. +87DAE296-C04F-4DA5-82A9-AC2715A065F8 +School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. +bush@biology.utah.edu -text - - -European Journal of Taxonomy +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy - -2024 - -2024-11-07 + +2024 + +2024-11-07 - -968 + +968 - -174 -199 + +174 +199 - -https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2727/12527 + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2727/12527 -journal article -10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2727 -2118-9773 -14100656 -6E04160B-9B4D-4D93-BE81-E37D2253FDB1 +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2727 +2118-9773 +14100656 +6E04160B-9B4D-4D93-BE81-E37D2253FDB1 @@ -60,7 +62,7 @@ chilchil ( -Ansari, 1955 +Ansari, 1955 ) @@ -77,7 +79,7 @@ Brueelia chilchil -Ansari, 1955: 53–54 +Ansari, 1955: 53–54 . @@ -88,7 +90,7 @@ Brueelia chilchil -Ansari, 1956b: 394 +Ansari, 1956b: 394 ; primary homonym. @@ -99,7 +101,7 @@ Brueelia chilchil -Ansari, 1958: 48–49 +Ansari, 1958: 48–49 , figs 9–15; primary homonym. @@ -112,11 +114,11 @@ – -Ansari 1956a: 160 +Ansari 1956a: 160 , figs 63–66. — - + Price et al . 2003: 154 @@ -124,54 +126,53 @@ Price . — -Gustafsson & Bush 2017: 37–38 +Gustafsson & Bush 2017: 37–38 . — -Mey 2017: 158 +Mey 2017: 158 . - + Type material - + + Neotype - - - PAKISTAN • ♂ ; -Faisalabad -[as Lyallpur]; +Faisalabad +[as +Lyallpur +]; 11 May 1932 ; -M.A. -R -. -Ansari +M.A.R. Ansari leg.; ex + Argya caudata eclipes ( -Hume, 1877 +Hume, 1877 ) + ; NHMUK010670544 ; -NHMUK +NHMUK . @@ -184,7 +185,7 @@ leg.; ex Painjunirmus ) chilchil -Ansari, 1955 +Ansari, 1955 . 1 @@ -199,16 +200,22 @@ leg.; ex + INDIA • 1 ♂ , 2 ♀♀ -; Rajputana; -Mar. 1937 ; -R -. Meinertzhagen leg.; ex +Rajputana +; + +Mar. 1937 + +; +R. Meinertzhagen +leg.; ex + Argya caudata eclipes @@ -222,21 +229,31 @@ or Argya caudata caudata -]; 8922; -NHMUK -010709538; -NHMUK +] + +; 8922; +NHMUK010709538 +; +NHMUK + • + 1 ♂ , 2 ♀♀ ; -3 Jan. 1952 -; Bharatpur [ + +3 Jan. 1952 + +; +Bharatpur +[ Rajasthan ]; -R -. Meinertzhagen leg.; ex +R. Meinertzhagen +leg.; + +ex Argya caudata eclipes @@ -250,11 +267,14 @@ or Argya caudata caudata -]); 19670, Brit. Mus. 1952-143; -NHMUK -010708235; -NHMUK +] + +); 19670, Brit. Mus. 1952-143; +NHMUK010708235 +; +NHMUK . + @@ -265,7 +285,7 @@ or Painjunirmus ) chilchil -Ansari, 1955 +Ansari, 1955 . 3 @@ -283,12 +303,12 @@ or + PAKISTAN • 2 ♀♀ -; same data as for -neotype -; ex +; same data as for neotype; ex + Argya caudata eclipes @@ -302,19 +322,28 @@ or Argya caudata caudata -]); -NHMUK -010670544; -NHMUK +] + +); +NHMUK010670544 +; +NHMUK + • + 6 ♂♂ , 9 ♀♀ -; Peshawar; -Mar. 1937 ; -R -. Meinertzhagen leg.; ex +Peshawar +; + +Mar. 1937 + +; +R. Meinertzhagen +leg.; ex + Argya caudata eclipes @@ -328,20 +357,27 @@ or Argya caudata caudata -]); 9193–94, 9501; -NHMUK -010709539; -NHMUK +] + +); 9193–94, 9501; +NHMUK010709539 +; +NHMUK + • + 4 ♂♂ , 16 ♀♀ ; same data as for preceding; 9445–47; -NHMUK -010709540; -NHMUK +NHMUK010709540 +; +NHMUK + . + + Type host @@ -351,11 +387,13 @@ or Argya caudata eclipes ( -Hume, 1877 +Hume, 1877 ) – common babbler. + + Type locality @@ -477,10 +515,10 @@ See remarks under P. ) pengya -Ansari, 1947 +Ansari, 1947 , for a discussion on -Mey’s (2017) +Mey’s (2017) claims regarding Br. @@ -494,15 +532,15 @@ claims regarding for Brueelia chilchil -Ansari, 1955 +Ansari, 1955 . The selection of this specimen is based on the following arguments: 1) -Ansari (1955) +Ansari (1955) did not specify any collection locality of his specimens, nor did he give any indication of how many specimens were examined. Later, -Ansari (1956a) +Ansari (1956a) gave more information, including 35 specimens from Lyallpur erroneously referred to as “ @@ -510,16 +548,16 @@ from Lyallpur erroneously referred to as “ ”, which is invalid as paratypes must be designated in the original publication. -Ansari (1956a) +Ansari (1956a) also mentioned the examination of 3 specimens from Bharatpur (Rajputana), which were from the Meinertzhagen collection. 2) No identification numbers of any of these specimens were given, but -Ansari (1956a: 133) +Ansari (1956a: 133) stated that all types are in the NHMUK collection. As stated by - + Naz et al. (2020) @@ -534,13 +572,13 @@ from Lyallpur remain at the NHMUK. This slide is labeled with a red T on the fro 3) The specimens at NHMUK may be from the set of specimens considered “ paratypes ” by -Ansari (1956a) +Ansari (1956a) . However, this cannot be ascertained today; nor could any of them be designated the lectotype , as no paratypes were mentioned at the original description ( -Ansari 1955 +Ansari 1955 ). To avoid any future confusion around the identity of this species, we designate the male on this slide the neotype , whereas the females on this slide have no special status. diff --git a/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFDC0F781D17B4A2FBD4C0B2.xml b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFDC0F781D17B4A2FBD4C0B2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0d5c580309e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/26/18/93/2618930BFFDC0F781D17B4A2FBD4C0B2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,547 @@ + + + +Resurrection of Painjunirmus Ansari, 1947 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) as a subgenus of Brueelia Kéler, 1936, with description of one new species + + + +Author + +Gustafsson, Daniel R. +19BFE360-6665-4A1B-89DC-33E5D5AC6C39 +Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong Institute of Zoology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. +kotatsu@fripost.org + + + +Author + +Bush, Sarah E. +87DAE296-C04F-4DA5-82A9-AC2715A065F8 +School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. +bush@biology.utah.edu + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2024 + +2024-11-07 + + +968 + + +174 +199 + + + + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2727/12527 + +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2727 +2118-9773 +14100656 +6E04160B-9B4D-4D93-BE81-E37D2253FDB1 + + + + + +Subgenus + +Painjunirmus +Ansari, 1947 + + + + + + + + + +Brueelia +Kéler, 1936: 257 + + +(in partim). + + + + + + +Painjunirmus +Ansari, 1947: 285 + + +. + + + + + + + +Type +species + + + + + + + +Painjunirmus pengya +Ansari, 1947: 285 + + +, by original designation. + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) + +is close to + +Brueelia +( +Brueelia +) + +based on the following shared characters: +as3, pns +and +s4 +absent; dorsal preantennal suture absent and marginal carina uninterrupted [except in + +Br. +( +Br. +) +phasmasoma +Gustafsson & Bush, 2017 + +]; +mts3 +only temporal macroseta; +fII- +v2 and +fIII-v2 +absent; parameral heads not folded medianly; female subgenital plate forming cross-piece at vulval margin; post-spiracular sensilla present on abdominal segments II–VII in both sexes. + + +These two subgenera are separated by the following characters: antennae at least slightly sexually dimorphic in +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +) ( +Figs 3–4 +), but monomorphic in +Br. +( + +Brueelia + +); +fI-v4 +clearly shorter than + +fI-v +1 + +in +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +) ( +Fig. 1 +), but as long as + +fI-v +1 + +in +Br. +( + +Brueelia + +); +aps +present on male tergopleurite IV in +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +) ( +Fig. 1 +; also on tergopleurite III in some species; +Fig. 9 +), but absent on male tergopleurite IV in +Br. +( + +Brueelia + +) [except in + +Brueelia +( +Br. +) +nebulosa +( +Burmeister, 1838 +) + +]; +ames +sensilla present on gonopore in +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +) ( +Fig. 6 +), but absent in +Br. +( + +Brueelia + +); mesosomal lobes with antero-lateral “horns” in +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +) ( +Fig. 6 +), but no such “horns” in +Br. +( + +Brueelia + +). + + + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) + +is also rather similar to the genus + +Teinomordeus +Gustafsson & Bush, 2017 + +. These two groups share the antero-lateral “horns” of the mesosome, the slightly sexually dimorphic antennae, and the patterns of abdominal chaetotaxy of the male. However, these two groups can be separated by the following characters: cross-piece present in +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +) ( +Fig. 8 +), but absent in + +Teinomordeus + +; head sensillus +s4 +present in + +Teinomordeus + +, but absent in +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +) ( +Fig. 3 +); +ps +are present on female abdominal segment II in + +Teinomordeus + +, but absent in +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +) ( +Fig. 2 +); +pmes +present on gonopore in +Br. +( + +Painjunirmus + +) (Fig, 6), but absent in + +Teinomordeus + +. + + + + + +Description + + + +Both sexes + + +Head dome-shaped ( +Fig. 3 +), slightly variable between species. Lateral margins of preantennal head slightly convex to more or less straight. Frons concave, hyaline. Marginal carina uninterrupted, displaced and much widened at osculum. Head chaetotaxy as in +Fig. 3 +; +as3, pns, s4 +absent; +pos +on or near eye. Antennae sexually dimorphic, with male scape ( +Fig. 3 +) at least slightly swollen and elongated compared to female scape ( +Fig. 4 +), but varying degree of difference among species. Temporal and occipital carinae not visible. Prothorax rectangular, +psps +on postero-lateral corner ( +Figs 1–2 +). Pterothorax roughly trapezoidal, but with rounded or slightly convergent posterior margin; +mms +moderately separated medianly. Meso- and metasterna not fused, each with 1 seta on each side on postero-lateral corners. Male tergopleurites II–IX+X and female tergopleurites II–VIII divided medianly ( +Figs 1–2 +). Tergopleurites with no or only very small antero-lateral re-entrant heads ( +Figs 1–2 +). Sternal plates with concave lateral margins ( +Fig. 26 +), in some species with lateral modifications ( +Figs 1–2 +). Accessory sternal plates absent. Pigmentation largely translucent except for sternal and subgenital plates of abdomen, gular plate, and lateral margins of head; extent of dark pigmentation variable between species, and indicated with grey lines in illustrations. + + +Male + + +Abdominal chaetotaxy rich ( +Fig. 1 +), variable among species; +aps +on at least tergopleurites IV–VII; +tps +on at least tergopleurites VI–VIII, in some species on V. Basal apodeme variable in size and shape ( +Figs 5 +, +13 +, +21 +, +29 +, +37 +). Proximal mesosome extended to overlap with basal apodeme. Antero-lateral corners of mesosomal lobes extended into “horns” ( +Fig. 6 +); distal mesosome intensely rugose; 2 +pmes +sensilla on each side of gonopore, associated with paler area of mesosomal lobes. Gonopore roughly crescent-shaped, with 3 +ames +sensilla on each side. Penile arms slender ( +Fig. 6 +). Parameral heads broad, blunt ( +Fig. 7 +). Parameral blades much elongated; +pst1 +sensillus, central; +pst2 +microsetae, on lateral margin. + + +Female + + +Abdominal chaetotaxy sparse ( +Fig. 2 +); +aps +, +tps, +and +ss +absent on all segments; +psps +present only on tergopleurites VI–VII. Subgenital plate with more or less sinuous lateral margins ( +Fig. 8 +), connected to cross-piece. Few slender +vms +and many thorn-like +vss +along vulval margin; few +vos +on each side of subgenital plate; distal 1 +vos +median to +vss +and separated from other +vos +by pronounced gap. + + + + + +Host distribution + + + +Only known from hosts in the genus + +Argya + +( +Passeriformes +: +Leiothrichidae +). + + + + + +Geographical range + + + +Africa, Middle East, +India +, +Myanmar +[?]. + + + + + +Included species + + + +• + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +alba + +sp. nov. + + +• + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +brevipennis +Ansari, 1956a: 159 + +. + + +• + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +chilchil +Ansari, 1955: 53 + +. + + +• + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +magnini +Ansari, 1956a: 161 + +. + + +• + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +parva +( +Mey, 2017: 164 +) + +[in + +Garrulaxeus + +] [tentatively included] + + +• + +Brueelia +( +Painjunirmus +) +pengya +( +Ansari, 1947: 285 +) + +[in + +Painjunirmus + +] + + + + \ No newline at end of file