From 765d14c960c9eae2d63dc17ba52a9584bb3f5e71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ggserver Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 19:02:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add updates up until 2024-09-26 18:56:17 --- .../9E/00AE9E6B41615A36936E888EBDA04973.xml | 82 +- .../76/4F03761C0BB6575BAFAF76521FE9B8D8.xml | 82 +- .../46/56434687F9FF5F0B94C55BF55C0EA8F6.xml | 80 +- .../67/667767C9D4C45081B73887C28F44C770.xml | 84 +- .../AC/7AB6ACDDB6495D279BBB6B6D3AA6B53E.xml | 84 + .../36/8BE8362270C55EB4B876324E5316EA3F.xml | 2146 +++++++++++++++++ .../AE/A06EAE35FFE80340FF1372F3FEC1BC5A.xml | 55 +- 7 files changed, 2435 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-) create mode 100644 data/7A/B6/AC/7AB6ACDDB6495D279BBB6B6D3AA6B53E.xml create mode 100644 data/8B/E8/36/8BE8362270C55EB4B876324E5316EA3F.xml diff --git a/data/00/AE/9E/00AE9E6B41615A36936E888EBDA04973.xml b/data/00/AE/9E/00AE9E6B41615A36936E888EBDA04973.xml index c4c4dfe853b..b4c9cbeb41a 100644 --- a/data/00/AE/9E/00AE9E6B41615A36936E888EBDA04973.xml +++ b/data/00/AE/9E/00AE9E6B41615A36936E888EBDA04973.xml @@ -1,46 +1,48 @@ - - - -A taxonomic review of the genus Fignya Solovyev & Witt, 2009 (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) with descriptions of three new species and one new combination + + + +A taxonomic review of the genus Fignya Solovyev & Witt, 2009 (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) with descriptions of three new species and one new combination - - -Author + + +Author -Wu, Jun -0000-0002-8032-2522 -School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China +Wu, Jun +0000-0002-8032-2522 +School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China - - -Author + + +Author -Han, Huilin -0000-0002-2045-6182 -School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China +Han, Huilin +0000-0002-2045-6182 +School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2024 - -2024-09-26 + +2024 + +2024-09-26 - -1213 + +1213 - -225 -235 + +225 +235 -journal article -10.3897/zookeys.1213.132318 -3E178C26-C21C-4BD9-B6AD-5DBCDD3D88E1 +journal article +303665 +10.3897/zookeys.1213.132318 +0f4c671d-74a2-47ef-8f46-8a4bd899b4e3 +3E178C26-C21C-4BD9-B6AD-5DBCDD3D88E1 @@ -67,8 +69,9 @@ Kitanola brachygnatha - Wu & Fang, 2008 + + , Acta Entomol. Sinica 51 (8): 866. Type locality: @@ -82,9 +85,6 @@ IZCAS . - - - @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Material examined. - + China • ♂ @@ -104,9 +104,9 @@ , Jinghong City , -Mengyang Town +Mengyang Town , -Yexianggu +Yexianggu , 4–5. viii. 2018 @@ -115,7 +115,9 @@ HL Han & MR Li -leg., genit. prep. WuJ- 243-1, in +leg., genit. prep. +WuJ-243-1 +, in NEFU diff --git a/data/4F/03/76/4F03761C0BB6575BAFAF76521FE9B8D8.xml b/data/4F/03/76/4F03761C0BB6575BAFAF76521FE9B8D8.xml index faba074a61a..ef3376bd443 100644 --- a/data/4F/03/76/4F03761C0BB6575BAFAF76521FE9B8D8.xml +++ b/data/4F/03/76/4F03761C0BB6575BAFAF76521FE9B8D8.xml @@ -1,46 +1,48 @@ - - - -A taxonomic review of the genus Fignya Solovyev & Witt, 2009 (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) with descriptions of three new species and one new combination + + + +A taxonomic review of the genus Fignya Solovyev & Witt, 2009 (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) with descriptions of three new species and one new combination - - -Author + + +Author -Wu, Jun -0000-0002-8032-2522 -School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China +Wu, Jun +0000-0002-8032-2522 +School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China - - -Author + + +Author -Han, Huilin -0000-0002-2045-6182 -School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China +Han, Huilin +0000-0002-2045-6182 +School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2024 - -2024-09-26 + +2024 + +2024-09-26 - -1213 + +1213 - -225 -235 + +225 +235 -journal article -10.3897/zookeys.1213.132318 -3E178C26-C21C-4BD9-B6AD-5DBCDD3D88E1 +journal article +303665 +10.3897/zookeys.1213.132318 +0f4c671d-74a2-47ef-8f46-8a4bd899b4e3 +3E178C26-C21C-4BD9-B6AD-5DBCDD3D88E1 @@ -65,7 +67,7 @@ Type material. - + Holotype @@ -73,13 +75,17 @@ Cambodia • ♂ -, Samkos, +, +Samkos +, 7–8. ii. 2015 , YS Bae -leg., genit. prep. WuJ- 1132-1, in +leg., genit. prep. +WuJ-1132-1 +, in NEFU @@ -87,13 +93,15 @@ leg., genit. prep. WuJ- 1132-1, in - + Paratypes • 2 ♂ -, same data as for holotype, genit. prep. WuJ- 1131-1, all in +, same data as for holotype, genit. prep. +WuJ-1131-1 +, all in NEFU diff --git a/data/56/43/46/56434687F9FF5F0B94C55BF55C0EA8F6.xml b/data/56/43/46/56434687F9FF5F0B94C55BF55C0EA8F6.xml index f1a25277b98..e77c08daf83 100644 --- a/data/56/43/46/56434687F9FF5F0B94C55BF55C0EA8F6.xml +++ b/data/56/43/46/56434687F9FF5F0B94C55BF55C0EA8F6.xml @@ -1,46 +1,48 @@ - - - -A taxonomic review of the genus Fignya Solovyev & Witt, 2009 (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) with descriptions of three new species and one new combination + + + +A taxonomic review of the genus Fignya Solovyev & Witt, 2009 (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) with descriptions of three new species and one new combination - - -Author + + +Author -Wu, Jun -0000-0002-8032-2522 -School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China +Wu, Jun +0000-0002-8032-2522 +School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China - - -Author + + +Author -Han, Huilin -0000-0002-2045-6182 -School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China +Han, Huilin +0000-0002-2045-6182 +School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2024 - -2024-09-26 + +2024 + +2024-09-26 - -1213 + +1213 - -225 -235 + +225 +235 -journal article -10.3897/zookeys.1213.132318 -3E178C26-C21C-4BD9-B6AD-5DBCDD3D88E1 +journal article +303665 +10.3897/zookeys.1213.132318 +0f4c671d-74a2-47ef-8f46-8a4bd899b4e3 +3E178C26-C21C-4BD9-B6AD-5DBCDD3D88E1 @@ -69,7 +71,7 @@ Type material. - + Holotype @@ -82,7 +84,7 @@ , Xingren City , -Linggangshang +Linggangshang , 1470 m @@ -97,7 +99,9 @@ B Gao & RT Xu -leg., genit. prep. WuJ- 1129-1, in +leg., genit. prep. +WuJ-1129-1 +, in NEFU @@ -105,13 +109,15 @@ leg., genit. prep. WuJ- 1129-1, in - + Paratypes • 3 ♂ -, same data as for holotype, genit. prep. WuJ- 806-1, 1130-1, all in +, same data as for holotype, genit. prep. +WuJ-806-1 +, 1130-1, all in NEFU diff --git a/data/66/77/67/667767C9D4C45081B73887C28F44C770.xml b/data/66/77/67/667767C9D4C45081B73887C28F44C770.xml index 4f0947fce1b..37fbdd45d61 100644 --- a/data/66/77/67/667767C9D4C45081B73887C28F44C770.xml +++ b/data/66/77/67/667767C9D4C45081B73887C28F44C770.xml @@ -1,46 +1,48 @@ - - - -A taxonomic review of the genus Fignya Solovyev & Witt, 2009 (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) with descriptions of three new species and one new combination + + + +A taxonomic review of the genus Fignya Solovyev & Witt, 2009 (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) with descriptions of three new species and one new combination - - -Author + + +Author -Wu, Jun -0000-0002-8032-2522 -School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China +Wu, Jun +0000-0002-8032-2522 +School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China - - -Author + + +Author -Han, Huilin -0000-0002-2045-6182 -School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China +Han, Huilin +0000-0002-2045-6182 +School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2024 - -2024-09-26 + +2024 + +2024-09-26 - -1213 + +1213 - -225 -235 + +225 +235 -journal article -10.3897/zookeys.1213.132318 -3E178C26-C21C-4BD9-B6AD-5DBCDD3D88E1 +journal article +303665 +10.3897/zookeys.1213.132318 +0f4c671d-74a2-47ef-8f46-8a4bd899b4e3 +3E178C26-C21C-4BD9-B6AD-5DBCDD3D88E1 @@ -67,7 +69,7 @@ Type material. - + Holotype @@ -82,7 +84,7 @@ , Xiaocaoba Town , -Yutang Village +Yutang Village , 1864 m @@ -93,9 +95,11 @@ , RT Xu -& MX -Han -leg., genit. prep. WuJ- 1136-1, in +& +MX Han +leg., genit. prep. +WuJ-1136-1 +, in NEFU @@ -103,7 +107,7 @@ leg., genit. prep. WuJ- 1136-1, in - + Paratypes @@ -111,7 +115,9 @@ leg., genit. prep. WuJ- 1136-1, in China • 2 ♂ -, same data as for holotype, genit. prep. WuJ- 1111-1, 1112-1, all in +, same data as for holotype, genit. prep. +WuJ-1111-1 +, 1112-1, all in NEFU diff --git a/data/7A/B6/AC/7AB6ACDDB6495D279BBB6B6D3AA6B53E.xml b/data/7A/B6/AC/7AB6ACDDB6495D279BBB6B6D3AA6B53E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..42100fa855e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/7A/B6/AC/7AB6ACDDB6495D279BBB6B6D3AA6B53E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + +A taxonomic review of the genus Fignya Solovyev & Witt, 2009 (Lepidoptera, Limacodidae) with descriptions of three new species and one new combination + + + +Author + +Wu, Jun +0000-0002-8032-2522 +School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China + + + +Author + +Han, Huilin +0000-0002-2045-6182 +School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2024 + +2024-09-26 + + +1213 + + +225 +235 + + + +journal article +303665 +10.3897/zookeys.1213.132318 +0f4c671d-74a2-47ef-8f46-8a4bd899b4e3 +3E178C26-C21C-4BD9-B6AD-5DBCDD3D88E1 + + + + +Genus + +Fignya +Solovyev & Witt, 2009 + + + + + + + + +Fignya + +Solovyev & Witt, 2009: 197 +. +Type +species (by original designation): + +Fignya melkaya +Solovyev & Witt, 2009 + +. +Type +locality: +Vietnam +, Mt. Fan-si-pan (West). + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/8B/E8/36/8BE8362270C55EB4B876324E5316EA3F.xml b/data/8B/E8/36/8BE8362270C55EB4B876324E5316EA3F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0e987973842 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/8B/E8/36/8BE8362270C55EB4B876324E5316EA3F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,2146 @@ + + + +A new species of the rare genus Endogeophilus from southern France, with a key to the European genera of Geophilidae s. l. (Chilopoda) + + + +Author + +Iorio, Étienne +https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2550-3480 +EI – Entomologie & Myriapodologie, 36 impasse des Acacias, F- 84260 Sarrians, France + + + +Author + +Bonato, Lucio +0000-0002-8312-7570 +Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Padova, via U. Bassi 58 b, I- 35131 Padova, Italy & National Biodiversity Future Centre, Palermo, Italy + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2024 + +2024-09-26 + + +1213 + + +199 +224 + + + +journal article +10.3897/zookeys.1213.133171 +CCDC5C64-CBF4-4F02-AAD9-979642899A68 + + + + + +Endogeophilus alberti + +sp. nov. + + + + +Type specimen. + + + + +Holotype + +(Figs +2 +, +3 +): • +♀ +, + +31. III. 2023 + +, +É. Iorio +leg. In ethanol. Body in four pieces: head, maxillae, mandibles, and trunk. Original label: +Cavalaire-sur-Mer +(Var), +Malatra +, “ +MALAT 3 +”, + +43.1795 ° N +, +6.5068 ° E + +( +WGS 84 +), +31. III. 2023 +, É. Iorio leg. Deposited in the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris ( +Chilopoda +collection, number +M 370 +). + + + + + + + + +Endogeophilus alberti + +sp. nov. +, holotype +A +labrum +B +first maxillae +C +right part of the forcipular segment +D +LBS +18 +E +ultimate +LBS +without distal part of legs +F +left part of the ultimate +LBS +without distal part of leg. Views: ventral ( +A – E +), dorsal ( +F +). Scale bars: 20 µm ( +A +); 40 µm ( +B +); 100 µm ( +C – F +). + + + + + + + + +Endogeophilus alberti + +sp. nov. +, holotype +A +head and forcipular segment +B +antennae +C +distal articles of left antenna +D +right telopodite of second maxillae +E +head and forcipular segment +F +right forcipule +G +LBS +15 and anterior part of 16 +H +ultimate +LBS +without right leg. Views: ventral ( +D – H +), dorsal ( +A – C +). Abbreviations: cls club-like sensilla, cmx claw of the second maxillae, cp coxopleural pores, cs carpophagus-structure. Scale bars: 200 µm ( +A – B, E, G – H +); 50 µm ( +C – D, F +). + + + + + +Type locality. + + +France +: Var department: Cavalaire-sur-Mer: near Malatra: + +43.1795 ° N +, +6.5068 ° E + +(WGS 84), +215 m +a. s. l., north-eastern slope (Fig. +1 +). + + + + +Diagnosis. + + +An + +Endogeophilus +species + +with claw of the second maxillae slender and hooked at its tip; forcipular trochanteroprefemur ~ 1.1 × as long as wide; forcipular tarsungulum> 2.0 × as long as wide, almost as long as the trochanteroprefemur, distinctly curved, fairly slender, and gradually narrowing. See also Table +1 +, Figs +2 +– +4 +, and Discussion. + + + + + + + +Endogeophilus ichnusae + +, paratype PD 1373, ventral +A +head and forcipular segment +B +right forcipule and apical claw of the second maxillae. Abbreviation: cmx claw of the second maxillae. Scale bars: 100 µm. + + + + + + + +Differences between the single specimen of + +Endogeophilus alberti + +sp. nov. +and the three specimens of + +E. ichnusae + +. For each character, each possible explanation (intraspecific variability, errors in character evaluation or divergence between species) has been evaluated as probable (x), possible (?) or improbable (–), based on what is known from other +Geophilidae +. Data are from +Bonato et al. (2016) +and this study. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Species + +E. alberti + +sp. nov. + +E. ichnusae +Explanations
Specimens examined1, female, 24.5 mm3, both sexes, 31–34 mmDifferences in body sizeDifferences between sexesVariability between individualsErrors in character evaluationDifferences between species
Head: setae: max length22 μm15 μm––?x?
Labrum: distinction between side-pieces and intermediate partfaintdistinctx–??–
Labrum: number of tubercles12?–x––
Antenna: length / width3.23.6?–x?–
First maxillae: coxosternal lappetabsentsmall?–x–?
First maxillae: telopodital lappetlargesmall?–x–?
Second maxillae: pretarsusslender, hooked at the tipstout, not hooked––––x
Forcipular metatergite: width / length2.31.8?–x??
Forcipular trochanteroprefemur: length / width1.11.3––––x
Forcipular tarsungulum: length / width2.21.9––––x
Forcipule / coxosternite length0.9–1.00.7–0.8––––x
Forcipular tarsungulum: shapenarrowing graduallynarrowing abruptly––––x
Anterior part of trunk: metasternite: carpophagus pitdistinct, fairly deepfaint, shallow?–x–?
Legs in female: number99107––x–?
Coxopleuron: pores: number5 or 69–15x–––?
Ultimate / penultimate telopodite length1.72.0x––??
+ + + + + +Description of the +holotype + + + +(Figs +2 +, +3 +). + +General features +. + +Body remarkably slender, +24.5 mm +long, uniformly ~ +0.3 mm +wide for most part of the trunk, only very slightly narrowing anteriorly along ~ 20 most anterior leg-bearing segments and backwards along approximately the five most posterior leg-bearing segments. Legs relatively short. Colour almost uniformly pale yellow, only the forcipules and the head slightly darker, both pale orange. + + + +Cephalic capsule and antennae +. + +Head +0.4 mm +long, sub-rectangular, 1.15 × longer than wide (Fig. +3 A +); the anterior margin slightly angulated with a small medial notch. Transverse suture absent. Approximately 40 setae on the head, the majority being short except those of the lateral margins, longer, reaching up to ~ 22 μm. Clypeus uniformly areolate, without clypeal areas and without plagulae, with six setae, arranged in a longitudinal series of three pairs on the anterior median part of the clypeus. Pleurites uniformly areolate, with some setae. Labrum composed of an intermediate part narrow and almost negligible, having one tubercle (Fig. +2 A +); side pieces not clearly distinct from the intermediate part of labrum, each with four bristles. Antennae with 14 articles, +1.3 mm +long, 3.2 × longer than the head (Fig. +3 B +). article I ~ 0.7 × longer than wide, articles II – VII up to 1.7 × longer than wide, article VIII ~ 1.2 × longer than wide, articles IX – XIII approximately as long as wide; setae gradually denser and shorter from basal to distal articles, both ventrally and dorsally. Article XIV 2.0 × longer than wide, with numerous setae and with club-like sensilla grouped on the distal parts of both internal and external sides (Fig. +3 C +). + + + +Mandibles and maxillae +. + +A single pectinate lamella on each mandible. Coxosternite of the first maxillae entire, without mid-longitudinal sulcus. Coxal projection sub-triangular, longer than wide, bearing one or two basal setae and some more distal spine-like sensilla. Telopodite comprises two articles, the basal one without setae, the distal one with three setae and five or six spine-like sensilla. No coxosternal lappets; telopodital lappets present and pointed (Fig. +2 B +). Coxosternite of the second maxillae entire, the intermediate part uniformly sclerotised as the remaining parts, its anterior margin concave; no sclerotised ridges. Telopodite of the second maxillae composed of three articles: article 1 with two or three very short external setae, article 2 with one or two very short external setae, article 3 with five or six long distal setae; a simple long apical claw, subconical but hook-shaped at its extremity, with a dorsal bulge at its mid length (Fig. +3 D +). + + + +Forcipular segment +. + +Tergite trapezoid, the lateral margins distinctly converging anteriorly, ~ 2.3 × wider than long, posteriorly almost as wide as the subsequent metatergite (Fig. +3 A +). Exposed part of the coxosternite ~ 1.1 × wider than long; anterior margin with a medial shallow concavity, without denticles. Coxopleural sutures complete, entirely ventral or almost, only very slightly sinuous, and strongly converging posteriorly. Chitin-lines well distinct, reaching the condyles, moderately curved and converging posteriorly (Figs +2 C +, +3 E +). Trochanteroprefemur ~ 1.1 × as wide as long, the external side ~ 2.2 × longer than the internal side, without denticles and with some setae (Figs +2 C +, +3 F +). Forcipular intermediate articles distinct, without denticles, each with some long setae. Tarsungulum curved, gradually narrowing, ~ 2.2 × as long as wide and with a basal sub-conic tubercle; slightly crenulated in its concavity, with 3–6 shallow projections, less pronounced on the left than on the right (Figs +2 C +, +3 F +). + + + +Leg-bearing segments +. + +99 +LBS +. No paratergites. Metatergite 1 wider than the subsequent one, lateral margins converging posteriorly, without pretergite. Metatergites with two paramedian sulci. Metasternites slightly longer than wide (length / width ratio ~ 1.1 at ~ 20 % of the +LBS +), uniformly areolate; setae very sparse. Metasternites of +LBS +10–20 with a carpophagus pit on the anterior margin, fairly deep on +LBS +14–19, ~ 0.6 × as wide as the margin of metasternite (Figs +2 D +, +3 G +). Glandular pores on the metasternites from the 2 +nd +to the penultimate, up to 30–35 pores and loosely arranged in a sub-ovoid / sub-triangular pore-field on the posterior half of each metasternite in the anterior part of the trunk (Fig. +2 D +); the pore-fields being much less visible in the posterior half of the trunk, loosely arranged in a transverse band of pores in the ~ 5–10 penultimate +LBS +. Length / width ratio of leg tarsus ~ 2.3 at ~ 20 % of the +LBS +. Leg claws simple. + + + +Ultimate leg-bearing segment +. + +Setae uniformly sparse. Pleuropretergite entire, lacking sutures or sulci. Metatergite sub-trapezoid, ~ 1.5 × wider than long, lateral margins very slightly convex and distinctly converging posteriorly, posterior margin convex. Presternite not medially constricted. Metasternite trapezoid, ~ 1.3 × wider than long, anteriorly 1.4 × wider than posteriorly (Fig. +2 E +); lateral margins slightly convex, converging backwards; posterior margin straight. Coxal organs of each coxopleuron opening through five or six independent pores: two dorsal pores, one covered by the pleuropretergite and one exposed on the dorso-lateral side (Fig. +2 F +); three or four ventral pores including two or three more or less aligned under the edge of the corresponding metasternite and a single pore isolated on the postero-central part of the ventral side (Figs +2 E +, +3 H +). Telopodite +0.43 mm +long, 7.8 × as long as wide, ~ 1.7 × as long as the penultimate telopodite; six articles, all covered dorsally with sparse long setae, ventrally with dense shorter setae; a fairly well-developed apical claw (Fig. +3 H +). + + + +Postpedal segments +. + +Gonopods in the shape of a short, slightly bilobate lamina. A pair of anal pores. + + + + +Distribution and ecology. + + +The new species is only known from the type locality (see above; Fig. +1 +). The single specimen was collected in a shaded maquis of old + +Arbutus unedo + +L., 1753 with also some large + +Quercus suber + +L., 1753 (Fig. +5 +). It was found after sieving with a Winkler apparatus, at a depth of +10–20 cm +in the soil. + + + + + + +Habitat of + +Endogeophilus alberti + +sp. nov. +, near Malatra, Cavalaire-sur-Mer, France (Fig. +1 +). + + + + + +Etymology. + + +This species is dedicated to Prince Albert II de +Monaco +, because the Foundation Prince Albert II de +Monaco +has supported the field work of this study. The epithet + +alberti + +is intended as a noun in the genitive case. + + + +Identification key to the European genera of +<taxonomicName id="E46F0AF5D59E7D6C75E84D7C986FCB9D" class="Chilopoda" family="Geophilidae" kingdom="Animalia" order="Geophilomorpha" phylum="Arthropoda" rank="family">Geophilidae</taxonomicName> +s. l. + + + +Within Europe, the +Geophilidae +s. l. can be distinguished from all other +Chilopoda +by means of the combination of the following two characters:> 25 pairs of legs and second maxillary pretarsi in shape of either subconical, non-spatulate, pointed claw or a tubercle with only one or two tiny spines. A total of 20 genera of +Geophilidae +s. l. are recorded in Europe (Table +2 +). + + + + + + +Genera of +Geophilidae +s. l. and approximate number of species recognised in Europe. Only genera recorded within the geographic boundaries adopted by Fauna Europaea are considered (see Materials and methods). Occurrences are also indicated for the biogeographical subregions of SW Europe and the two countries where + +Endogeophilus + +occurs. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
GenusApproximate number of species in EuropeOccurrence
South-western EuropeFranceItaly
+ +Acanthogeophilus +Minelli, 1982 + +1x–x
+ +Algerophilus +Brolemann, 1925 + +1x––
+ +Arctogeophilus +Attems, 1909 + +3–x–
+ +Arenophilus +Chamberlin, 1912 + +1xx–
+ +Bebekium +Verhoeff, 1941 + +1–––
+ +Clinopodes +C. L. Koch, 1847 + +9xxx
+ +Dignathodon +Meinert, 1870 + +2xxx
+ +Diphyonyx +Bonato, Zapparoli & Minelli, 2008 + +2–––
+ +Endogeophilus +Bonato, Zapparoli, Drago & Minelli, 2016 + +2xxx
+ +Eurygeophilus +Verhoeff, 1899 + +2xxx
+ +Galliophilus +Ribaut & Brolemann, 1927 + +1xx–
+ +Geophilus +Leach, 1814 + +49xxx
+ +Gnathoribautia +Brolemann, 1909 + +2x–x
+ +Henia +C. L. Koch, 1847 + +17xxx
+ +Nothogeophilus +Lewis, Jones & Keay, 1988 + +1–––
+ +Pachymerium +C. L. Koch, 1847 + +6xxx
+ +Pleurogeophilus +Verhoeff, 1901 + +3xxx
+ +Stenotaenia +C. L. Koch, 1847 + +9xxx
+ +Strigamia +Gray, 1843 + +7xxx
+ +Tuoba +Chamberlin, 1920 + +2xxx
Total121 species16 genera14 genera13 genera
+ + +The key should be applied by examining any specimen through a microscope. A magnification of 50 × is recommended, even 100 × for examining labrum and pore-fields. For characters defined on the leg-bearing segments, examination between the 5 +th +and the 20 +th +LBS +is recommended. + +In addition to the dichotomic characters included in the key, additional information is given for each genus (number of species recorded in Europe, geographical distribution within Europe, and additional morphological characters), between square brackets, to assist in the identification. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1 +Legs of the ultimate pair with an apical tubercle having minute spines (Fig. +10 B +: t) + + + +Arenophilus +Chamberlin, 1912 + + +
- +[In Europe: a single species, + +A. peregrinus +Jones, 1989 + +; recorded in very few localities on and near the coasts of south-western England, western France, and western Iberian peninsula. Always with 45 +LBS +.] +-
– +Legs of the ultimate pair with an apical claw or missing the pretarsus at all (Figs +3 H +, +10 A, C – I +) + +2 +
2 +Forcipular tergite sub-rectangular, more or less headband-shaped (Fig. +6 D, E +: ft) + +3 +
- +[The genera included here have a large basal denticle on the tarsungulum (Fig. +6 F +) or a deep median diastema on the forcipular coxosternite (Fig. +6 G, H +).] +-
– +Forcipular tergite trapezoid, posteriorly wider than anteriorly (Fig. +6 A – C +: ft) + +5 +
- +[With the exception of + +Gnathoribautia + +(Fig. +6 I +), the basal denticle of the tarsungulum, when existing, is smaller (Fig. +7 C, G +). No deep median diastema on the forcipular coxosternite (Figs +6 I +, +7 C, G +).] +-
3 +A large basal denticle on the tarsungulum (Fig. +6 F +: d). No deep median diastema and no chitin-lines on the forcipular coxosternite (Fig. +6 F +) + + + +Strigamia +Gray, 1843 + + +
-[In Europe: many species, across most continental lands.]-
– +No large basal denticle on the tarsungulum (Fig. +6 G, H +). A deep median diastema and distinct chitin-lines on the forcipular coxosternite (Fig. +6 G, H +: cl) + +4 +
4 +2 denticles on the mesial side of the tarsungulum (Fig. +6 G +: dc). Pore-fields absent + + + +Dignathodon +Meinert, 1870 + + +
- +[In Europe: only two species, + +D. microcephalus +(Lucas, 1846) + +(southern Europe; 65–89 +LBS +) and + +D. gracilis +(Attems, 1952) + +(only recorded in Andalusia; 59–71 +LBS +.] +-
– +No denticles on the mesial side of the tarsungulum (Fig. +6 H +). Pore-fields present, sub-circular to longitudinally much elongate + + + +Henia +C. L. Koch, 1847 + + +
-[In Europe: many species, across most continental lands and major islands.]-
5 +Coxal pores grouped in 1, 2, 3, or 4 ventral pits, fossae, or distinct clusters on each coxopleuron, all close to the metasternite or covered by it (Fig. +9 G – I +), but sometimes accompanied by 1 or 2 lateral or posterior separate pores + +6 +
- +[In France and in north-western Europe, with the exception of + +Nothogeophilus + +only recorded in England, the labrum of the species of the two other genera present in this area ( + +Clinopodes + +and + +Stenotaenia + +) generally has numerous bristles and no tubercles (Fig. +7 A +).] +-
– +All coxal pores separate, not in pits, fossae, or distinct clusters (Figs +2 E, F +, +3 H +, +9 A – F +, +10 E +) + +12 +
- +[In France and in north-western Europe, the genera included here have one to several tubercles on the intermediate part and bristles on the side pieces of the labrum (Figs +2 A +, +7 B +).] +-
6 +Forcipular coxosternite with a pair of distinctly sclerotised denticles (Fig. +7 E +) + +7 +
– +Forcipular coxosternite without distinctly sclerotised denticles (e. g., Fig. +7 G +) + +8 +
7 +Carpophagus structures absent (e. g., Fig. +8 G, H +). Coxal pores mostly or entirely in 1 ventral pit on each coxopleuron (Fig. +9 I +) + + + +Diphyonyx +Bonato, Zapparoli & Minelli, 2008 + + +
-[In Europe: a few species, from the Balkan peninsula to Caucasus. Claws of many anterior legs bearing an enlarged accessory spine.]-
– +Carpophagus structures present (Fig. +8 A, B +: cs). Coxal pores mostly or entirely in 2–4 ventral pits or clusters (e. g., Fig. +9 G +) + + + +Clinopodes +C. L. Koch, 1847 + + +
-[In Europe: many species, across most of central and eastern Europe.]-
8No pore-fields. Labrum without bristles and without tubercles + + +Bebekium +Verhoeff, 1941 + + +
- +[In Europe: a single species, + +B. mirabile +Verhoeff, 1941 + +; recorded only in the eastern part of the Balkan peninsula; 39–41 +LBS +.] +-
– +Pore-fields present (Fig. +8 D, E, G, H +: pf). Labrum with bristles, sometimes also with tubercles + +9 +
9 +All coxal pores in 2 or 3 ventral pits on each coxopleuron (Fig. +9 G, H +). Pore-fields oval or sub-trapezoid (Fig. +8 G +: pf) + + + +Stenotaenia +C. L. Koch, 1847 + + +
-[In Europe: many species, across most of central and eastern Europe.]-
– +All coxal pores in 1 ventral pit on each coxopleuron (Fig. +9 I +). Pore-fields sub-triangular (e. g., Fig. +8 D, E +: pf) or reniform or in a transverse band (Fig. +8 H +: pf) + +10 +
10 +Carpophagus structures present (Fig. +8 E +: cs). Pore-fields sub-triangular (e. g., Fig. +8 D, E +: pf). 57–71 +LBS + + + +Algerophilus +Brolemann, 1925 + + +
- +[In Europe: a single species, + +Algerophilus hispanicus +(Meinert, 1870) + +; only from southern Iberian peninsula.] +-
– +Carpophagus structures absent (Fig. +8 H +). Pore-fields reniform or in a transverse band (Fig. +8 H +: pf); 37–55 +LBS + +11 +
11 +Pore-fields more or less reniform, ≤ 1 / 2 of the width of the metasternite; 37–39 +LBS + + + +Nothogeophilus +Lewis, Jones & Keay, 1988 + + +
- +[In Europe: a single species, + +N. turki +Lewis, Jones & Keay, 1988 + +; only recorded from the isles of Scilly and Wight (southern England). Body length <15 mm.] +-
– +Pore-fields not reniform,> 1 / 2 of the width of the metasternite (Fig. +8 H +); 47–55 +LBS + + + +Tuoba +Chamberlin, 1920 + + +
- +[In Europe: only two species, + +T. poseidonis +(Verhoeff, 1901) + +(with 49–55 +LBS +; strictly halophilic, only present on the Mediterranean seashores) and + +T. zograffi +(Brolemann, 1900) + +(47 +LBS +; not halophilic; only recorded in the Canary islands).] +-
12 +More than 90 +LBS +. Pore-fields sub-ovoid / sub-triangular, approx. as long as wide or slightly longer than wide (Fig. +2 D +) + + + +Endogeophilus +Bonato, Zapparoli, Drago & Minelli, 2016 + + +
- +[In Europe: only 2 species, + +E. ichnusae + +from Sardinia and + +E. alberti + +sp. nov. +from southern Provence.] +-
– +Usually <90 +LBS + +1 + +. Pore-fields not sub-ovoid / sub-triangular (Fig. +8 C – F +: pf) or absent (Fig. +8 B +) + +13 +
13 +Legs of the ultimate pair without an apical claw (Fig. +10 A, G, H +). Pore-fields either absent (Fig. +8 B +) or small, sub-circular to slightly elliptical (Fig. +8 F +: pf) + +14 +
– +Legs of the ultimate pair with an apical claw, usually well-developed + +2 + +(Fig. +10 C, D +: c, E, F: c, I). Pore-fields usually present + +3 + +, sub-diamond or in a tranverse band (Fig. +8 D, E +: pf) + +17 +
14 +Pore-fields present, sub-circular to slightly elliptical (Fig. +8 F +: pf). Legs of the ultimate pair very elongated,> 2 × as long as the penultimate legs (Fig. +10 G, H +) + + + +Pleurogeophilus +Verhoeff, 1901 + + +
- +[In Europe: at least one species, + +P. mediterraneus +(Meinert, 1870) + +; in south-eastern Europe; 61–85 +LBS +; numerous coxal pores (frequently> 25 on each coxopleuron in adults) and the ultimate metasternite longer than wide (Fig. +9 E, F +).] +-
– +No pore-fields (Fig. +8 B +). Legs of the ultimate pair usually <2 × as long as the penultimate legs + +4 + + +15 +
15 +Forcipular trochanteroprefemur ~ as long as wide and without denticle (Fig. +7 F +: tp). Metasternite of the ultimate leg-bearing segment wider than long (Fig. +9 B +) + + + +Galliophilus +Ribaut & Brolemann, 1927 + + +
- +[In Europe: only one species, + +G. beatensis + +, recorded confidently only in the eastern Pyrenees; ~ 81–85 +LBS +; tarsungulum sharply compressed in the internal side, making almost a right angle in horizontal view (Fig. +7 F +).] +-
– +Forcipular trochanteroprefemur much longer than wide and with a denticle (Figs +6 I +, +7 C +: tp). Metasternite of the ultimate leg-bearing segment longer than wide (Fig. +9 A +) + +16 +
16 +39–41 +LBS +. Forcipular coxosternite slightly wider than long. All forcipular articles with a denticle (Fig. +7 C +) + + + +Arctogeophilus +Attems, 1909 + + +
- +[In Europe: three species, + +A. inopinatus +(Ribaut, 1911) + +(western and central France), + +A. attemsi +Folkmanová, 1956 + +, and + +A. macrocephalus +Folkmanova & Dobroruka, 1960 + +(both only recorded in Ukraine).] +-
– +67–87 +LBS +. Forcipular coxosternite slightly longer than wide. Forcipular trochanteroprefemur and tarsungulum with a denticle, intermediate forcipular articles without denticle (Fig. +6 I +) + + + +Gnathoribautia +Brolemann, 1909 + + +
- +[In Europe: only 2 species, + +G. bonensis + +(67–83 +LBS +; body length ≤ 7 cm; Macaronesia, Iberian peninsula, and Sicily) and + +G. syriaca +(Attems, 1903) + +(~ 87 +LBS +; body length ≤ 11 cm; Aegean islands] +-
17 +Metasternite of the ultimate leg-bearing segment longer than wide (Figs +9 D +, +10 I +) + +18 +
– +Metasternite of the ultimate leg-bearing segment wider than long (Fig. +9 C +) + +19 +
18 +Forcipular trochanteroprefemur and tarsungulum each with a denticle. Legs of the ultimate leg-bearing segment without elongate projections (Fig. +10 F +) + + + +Pachymerium +C. L. Koch, 1847 + + +
- +[In Europe: few species, across most of Europe. Numerous coxal pores,> 20 widely distributed on each coxopleuron in adults (Fig. +9 D +).] +-
– +Forcipules without denticles. Legs of the ultimate leg-bearing segment with elongate projections (Fig. +10 I +) + + + +Acanthogeophilus +Minelli, 1982 + + +
- +[In Europe: only 1 species, + +A. dentifer +Minelli, 1982 + +, only recorded in the Italian peninsula; ~ 67 +LBS +.] +-
19 +Forcipular coxosternite> 2 × as wide as long (Fig. +7 D +). Tarsungulum strongly narrowing near the base, very narrow for most of its length and distinctly compressed also along the external side (Fig. +7 D +) + + + +Eurygeophilus +Verhoeff, 1899 + + +
- +[In Europe: only 2 species, + +E. pinguis +(Brolemann, 1898) + +(<50 +LBS +) and + +E. multistiliger +(Verhoeff, 1899) + +(> 50 +LBS +). Pore-fields in a very stretched transverse band in both species (Fig. +8 C +: pf).] +-
– +Forcipular coxosternite <2 × as wide as long (Fig. +7 G +; also F). Tarsungulum gradually narrowing and compressed only along the internal side (Fig. +7 G +) + + + +Geophilus +Leach, 1814 + + +
- +[In Europe: many species. With the exception of + +G. carpophagus +Leach, 1815 + +, which has pore-fields in a very stretched transverse band, the other species have either stretched sub-triangular / sub-diamond pore-fields (Fig. +8 D, E +: pf) or no pore-fields +3 +.] +-
+ + + + + + +Head and forcipular segment. Species +A + +Pachymerium ferrugineum + +B + +Gnathoribautia bonensis + +C + +Pleurogeophilus mediterraneus + +D + +Strigamia carniolensis + +E + +Henia vesuviana + +F + +Strigamia carniolensis + +G + +Dignathodon microcephalus + +H + +Henia bicarinata + +I + +Gnathoribautia bonensis + +. Views: dorsal ( +A – E +), ventral ( +F – I +). Abbreviations: cl chitin-lines, d forcipular denticle, dc denticles of the mesal side of the forcipular tarsungulum, ft forcipular tergite. Arrow: median diastema of the forcipular coxosternite. Scale bars: 400 µm ( +A – F, H-I +); 300 µm ( +G +). + + + + + + + +A, B +labrum +C, D, F, G +forcipular segment +E +distal part of the forcipular coxosternite. Species +A + +Clinopodes vesubiensis + +B + +Geophilus studeri + +C + +Arctogeophilus inopinatus + +D + +Eurygeophilus pinguis + +E + +Clinopodes vesubiensis + +F + +Galliophilus beatensis + +G + +Geophilus gavoyi + +. Views: all ventral. Abbreviations: cl chitin-lines, d forcipular denticle, tp trochanteroprefemur. Arrow: denticles on the forcipular coxosternite. Scale bars: 50 µm ( +A, B +); 300 µm ( +C – G +). + + + + + + + +Metasternite of an anterior +LBS +. Species +A + +Clinopodes vesubiensis +LBS + +16 +B + +Galliophilus beatensis +LBS + +19 +C + +Eurygeophilus pinguis +LBS + +10 +D + +Geophilus osquidatum +LBS + +11 +E + +Geophilus electricus +LBS + +11 +F + +Pleurogeophilus mediterraneus +LBS + +15 +G + +Stenotaenia linearis +LBS + +20 +H + +Tuoba poseidonis +LBS + +12. All ventral views. Abbreviations: cs carpophagus-structure, pf pore-field. Scale bars: 200 µm. + + + + + + + +Ultimate +LBS +without distal part of legs. Species +A + +Arctogeophilus inopinatus + +female +B + +Galliophilus beatensis + +male +C + +Geophilus flavus + +female +D + +Pachymerium ferrugineum + +male +E + +Pleurogeophilus mediterraneus + +female +F + +Pleurogeophilus mediterraneus + +male +G +, +H + +Stenotaenia linearis + +female +I + +Tuoba poseidonis + +female. Views: ventral ( +A – G +), lateral ( +H, I +). Abbreviations: p pit or fossa ( +H +wide fossa from dorsal to ventral side, indicated by dotted lines), um metasternite of the ultimate +LBS +(medial length and maximum width are indicated by dotted lines). Scale bars: 300 µm. + + + + + + + +Legs of the ultimate pair +A, C +right leg +B, D +distal articles of the right leg +E – G +both legs +H +left leg. Species +A + +Arctogeophilus inopinatus + +male +B + +Arenophilus peregrinus + +female +C + +Eurygeophilus pinguis + +female +D + +Geophilus fucorum + +female +E + +Geophilus richardi + +female +F + +Pachymerium ferrugineum + +female +G + +Pleurogeophilus mediterraneus + +male +H + +Pleurogeophilus mediterraneus + +female +I + +Acanthogeophilus spiniger + +female. Views: ventral ( +A-E, I +), lateral ( +F +) and dorsal ( +G-H +). Abbreviations: c claw, t tubercle with spines. Scale bars: 300 µm ( +A, C, F +); 50 µm ( +B +); 100 µm ( +D, E, I +); 1 mm ( +G – H +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/A0/6E/AE/A06EAE35FFE80340FF1372F3FEC1BC5A.xml b/data/A0/6E/AE/A06EAE35FFE80340FF1372F3FEC1BC5A.xml index 6b16af9c630..248c821ddff 100644 --- a/data/A0/6E/AE/A06EAE35FFE80340FF1372F3FEC1BC5A.xml +++ b/data/A0/6E/AE/A06EAE35FFE80340FF1372F3FEC1BC5A.xml @@ -1,36 +1,41 @@ - - - -Catàleg actualitzat i claus d’identificació de les gramínies de Sant Llorenç del Munt i l’Obac (Barcelona) + + + +Catàleg actualitzat i claus d’identificació de les gramínies de Sant Llorenç del Munt i l’Obac (Barcelona) - - -Author + + +Author -Cardona, Àngel Manuel Hernández +Cardona, Àngel Manuel Hernández -text - - -Nemus +text + + +Nemus - -2022 - -12 + +2022 + +2022-12-31 - -64 -86 + +12 + + +64 +86 -journal article -10.5281/zenodo.12170499 -2386-3803 -12170499 +journal article +303666 +10.5281/zenodo.12170499 +80c88d46-86f4-4ee0-8824-0ca1310f2165 +2386-3803 +12170499 - + @@ -42,7 +47,7 @@ Roth (traiguera). De les regions mediterrània i iranoturaniana (o iranoturànica). Prospera en pastures, ermassos i vores de camins, sobretot a les zones baixes ( -Fig. 2 +Fig. 2 ).