diff --git a/data/00/F5/1A/00F51A50235E5E05A13964799158D495.xml b/data/00/F5/1A/00F51A50235E5E05A13964799158D495.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1c640cb8af3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/00/F5/1A/00F51A50235E5E05A13964799158D495.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+
+
+
+Four new Dolichopoda species from Greece, one Troglophilus new to Greece and new locality records (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alexiou, Sotiris
+0000-0003-1031-3003
+Korinthian Museum of Natural History, Isthmion 201, Korinthos 20100, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bakolitsas, Kostas
+0000-0003-3137-4024
+Laboratory of Natural Sciences 3 rd General Lyceum, 301 31 Agrinion, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Di Russo, Claudio
+0000-0002-1620-9592
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rampini, Mauro
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+103
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e121614
+5AA51752-2447-410B-A249-7B421D573CE4
+
+
+
+
+
+Troglophilus brevicauda
+Chopard, 1934
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 8
+
+
+
+
+Material examined.
+
+
+
+GREECE
+•
+6 ♂
+,
+3 ♀
+; Τhraki,
+Nomos Xanthis
+, road
+Xanthi-Stavroupoli
+,
+cave Lykodromio
+;
+
+41 ° 14.262 ' N
+,
+24 ° 45.838 ' E
+
+;
+
+526 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+17 Aug. 2020
+
+;
+G. Kofinas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Comment.
+
+
+
+New for
+Greece
+.
+
+
+Troglophilus brevicauda
+
+is a species known from Serbia, Bosnia / Herzegovina, Montenegro, North
+Macedonia
+and Bulgaria (
+Karaman et al. 2011
+). In Bulgaria, the species is found in the Rhodopi Mountain range in the south. Rhodopi is shared by Greece and Bulgaria, with our location on the Greek side expanding the distribution of the species to cover all of the mountain range. According to
+Karaman et al. (2011)
+, the population is an isolated local one. All the key morphological characteristics fit those of the species.
+
+
+
+Τhe record of an immature individual from Mt Falakro, E.
+Macedonia
+by
+Di Russo et al. (2014)
+could very well belong to the same species.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/95/B0/0395B06BFFCFFFAD7B53C50AFB3DF84F.xml b/data/03/95/B0/0395B06BFFCFFFAD7B53C50AFB3DF84F.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5348449a9bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/95/B0/0395B06BFFCFFFAD7B53C50AFB3DF84F.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,488 @@
+
+
+
+Sub-lethal toxic effect of cadmium chloride (CdCl) on freshwater murrel Channa punctata (BLOCH)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Choudhury, Mrinmoy
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Deka, Prantik
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Purkayastha, Debashree
+
+text
+
+
+International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-01-01
+
+
+12
+
+
+1
+
+
+63
+66
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.22271/fish.2024.v12.i1a.2893
+
+journal article
+300338
+10.22271/fish.2024.v12.i1a.2893
+5e0ea56f-c06a-4f6d-9a21-b389d8206297
+2347-5129
+12550280
+
+
+
+
+
+Species:
+
+punctata
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig 1:
+Channa punctata
+
+
+
+
+
+Materials and Methods
+
+
+
+
+Collection and maintenance of test fish
+
+
+
+
+Channa punctata
+
+were collected from culture pond near Serispore T.E., Hailakandi,
+Assam
+,
+India
+and brought to the laboratory in aerated containers. In the laboratory, the fishes were maintained in an aquarium with constant aeration. Fishes were fed with commercially available fish meal twice daily and were acclimatized in the aquarium for a week before the experiment.
+
+
+
+Experimental design of fish bio-assay
+
+
+
+For test setup,
+
+Channa punctata
+
+were kept in a tank (Group-I) with heavy metal (CdCl
+2
+) for seven days. A control with no treatment was also run simultaneously in another tank. After seventh day, the protein content of liver was examined.
+
+
+
+Experimental Design
+
+
+
+The fishes were randomly divided into three groups
+viz.,
+control, low dose, sub-lethal-1 (SL-I, 5ppm) and high dose sub-lethal 2(SL-II, 10ppm). They were kept in three different buckets containing 5 litres of water obtained from a pond and were labelled as control, SL-1(5ppm) and SL-2 (10ppm). The experiment was run for seven days. Fishes were taken out from all the tanks after seven days and were anesthetized and the total length and body weight were recorded. Test fishes were sacrificed and tissues like gills and liver were dissected and stored at refrigerator until further analysis.
+
+
+
+Procedure for estimation of total protein content Estimation of protein content
+
+
+
+Total protein content was estimated by the protocol developed by Lowry
+et al.
+(1951).
+
+
+
+Reagents used
+
+
+
+
+A. Alkaline copper Reagent.
+
+
+
+Reagent A: 2 % Na
+2
+CO
+
+3
+in
+
+0.1 N
+NaOH.
+
+
+Reagent B: 0.5% CuSO
+4.
+5H
+2
+O in sodium potassium tartarate
+
+The alkaline copper reagent was made by mixing 50 ml of reagent A and 1 ml of reagent B.
+B. Folin Ciocalteu phenol reagent (It is commercially available which is diluted with distilled water in the ratio of 1:2
+
+C.
+0.1N
+NaOH
+
+D. 70% alcohol
+
+E. Protein (stock) Standard solution:
+100mg
+% Bovine Serum Albumin in
+0.1 N
+NaOH.
+
+
+
+Working standard
+
+
+10 ml of the stock was diluted to 100ml with distilled water.
+
+
+The protocol
+
+
+
+1 ml of 70% alcohol was added to the test tube after 0.2 ml of tissue homogenate was pipetted out. For ten minutes, the tubes were centrifuged at 5,000 rpm. After discarding the supernatant, 1 ml of
+0.1N
+NaOH was used to dissolve the precipitate. 5 ml of Alkaline Copper Reagent was added, and it was left at room temperature for ten minutes. The Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent was added after ten minutes, and it was left in the dark for thirty minutes. The UV-Vis Spectrophotometer was used to measure the absorbance at
+620 nm
+against a blank for the reagent. Simultaneously, a series of graded protein standard volumes were run. The data are given as milligrams of protein per gram of tissue weight that is moist.
+
+
+
+
+Table 1:
+Morphological and behavioural changes in fishes when exposed to doses (5 ppm and 10 ppm) of CdCl
+2
+at different exposure time
+
+
+
+
+
+
Exposure Time
+
Dose
+
Colour Changes
+
Opercular activity
+
Bottom to surface movement
+
Resting at Bottom
+
Mucous Secretion
+
+Loss of Equilibrium
+
+
+
+
Control
+
+
+
Day 1
+
SL-I
+
=
+
*
+
+
+
=
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
SL-II
+
*
+
*
+
+
+
=
+
+
+
*
+
+
+
Control
+
+
+
Day 2
+
SL-I
+
+
+
=
+
=
+
*
+
+
+
=
+
+
+
SL-II
+
=
+
=
+
*
+
*
+
+
+
*
+
+
+
Day 3
+
Control SL-I
+
+
+
*
+
=
+
=
+
+
+
=
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
SL-II
+
=
+
*
+
*
+
=
+
+
+
*
+
+
+
Day 4
+
Control
+
+
+
SL-I
+
+
+
*
+
=
+
*
+
+
+
*
+
+
+
SL-II
+
=
+
*
+
=
+
=
+
+
+
*
+
+
+
Day 5
+
Control
+
+
+
SL-I
+
+
+
=
+
=
+
*
+
*
+
=
+
+
+
SL-II
+
=
+
+
+
*
+
+
+
=
+
*
+
+
+
Day 6
+
Control
+
+
+
SL-I
+
+
+
*
+
=
+
+
+
=
+
*
+
+
+
SL-II
+
+
+
=
+
+
+
=
+
=
+
+
+
+
+
Day 7
+
Control
+
+
+
SL-I
+
*
+
=
+
+
+
+
+
=
+
=
+
+
+
SL-II
+
+
+
=
+
*
+
+
+
*
+
+
+
+
+
+
+SL-I = 5 ppm; SL-II = 10 ppm
+“=” indicates no change or no increase/decrease
+“+” indicates occurrence of changes or increase in change
+“*” indicates occurrence of changes or decrease in change
+
+
+
+Table 2:
+Protein Content of the tissues (gill and liver) of
+
+C. punctata
+
+at different concentrations of CdCl
+2
+after 7 days of exposure
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Treatments
+
+
+Duration
+
+
+Gill
+
+
+Liver
+
+
+
+
5 ppm CdCl2 (mg/L)
+
7 Days
+
70.3±0.25
+
79.3±0.20
+
+
+
10 ppm CdCl2 (mg/L)
+
7 Days
+
65.3±0.30
+
71.3±0.25
+
+
+
Control
+
7 Days
+
82.5±0.20
+
89.7±0.15
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig 1:
+Protein Content of the tissues (gill and liver) of
+
+C. punctata
+
+at 5 ppm and 10 ppm of CdCl
+2
+after 7 days of exposure
+
+
+
+
+
+Results and Discussion
+
+
+
+The present study indicated that the heavy metal Cadmium Chloride (CdCl
+2
+) has a dreadful effect on the freshwater fish
+
+Channa punctata
+(Bloch)
+
+(Qureshi et al, 2011)
+
+[
+3
+]
+
+. From the behavioural responses of fish exposed to sub-lethal concentration of the heavy metal showed that they were under stress. The increase in opercular movement and the bottom to upward movement of the fishes to overcome hypoxic condition was seen in the 5
+th
+and 7
+th
+day of exposure. Mucus secretion, starting of depletion of scales, skin lesions on dorsal and lateral side of the body, copious mucus, clumping of gills increased with the increasing concentration of the toxicant (Rastogi,
+et al
+., 2018)
+
+[
+5
+]
+
+. Colour changes of the body from blackish to pale yellowish and restlessness again confirmed the anxiety level of the fishes in the experiment (
+Table 1
+). Also many visible lesions were observed near operculum, mouth, pectoral and pelvic fins and also near the caudal fins.
+
+
+Also from the total protein content assay, it was observed that the gills and liver tissues when exposed to sub lethal heavy metal concentration of CdCl
+2
+(5ppm and 10ppm) showed gradual decline in the protein content with the increase in exposure time, which further confirms the toxicity of the heavy metal (
+Table 2
+). This result indicates that the vital organs like gills and liver if affected proves lethal in survival of the fishes (Agrahari
+et al
+., 2007)
+
+[
+1
+]
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/09/87/46/0987463F2E2D509F88594C782A30D269.xml b/data/09/87/46/0987463F2E2D509F88594C782A30D269.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1cd3f5d19b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/09/87/46/0987463F2E2D509F88594C782A30D269.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,586 @@
+
+
+
+Description of six new species of Cyrtodactylus Gray (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from northeastern India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Boruah, Bitupan
+0000-0001-8829-6069
+Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Narayanan, Surya
+0000-0001-9359-2815
+SM Sehgal Foundation Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Bangalore, Karnataka 560064, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Aravind, Neelavar Ananthram
+0000-0002-4515-8421
+SM Sehgal Foundation Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Bangalore, Karnataka 560064, India & Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya University, Derlakatte, Mangalore, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Lalronunga, Samuel
+0000-0002-7542-4815
+Holy Child Society, Nalkata, Tripura 799263, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Deepak, V.
+0000-0002-8826-9367
+Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK & School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE 1 7 RU, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Das, Abhijit
+0000-0002-5851-8457
+Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
+
+text
+
+
+Vertebrate Zoology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+453
+486
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/vz.74.e124752
+154CE236-EFA8-4411-834B-234A9B45A63F
+
+
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus barailensis
+Boruah, Narayanan, Deepak & Das
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figure 5
+;
+Tables 2, S 2
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+.
+
+
+
+
+Adult female (WII-ADR 971), from Athibung (
+
+25.54199 ° N
+;
+93.6307 ° E
+
+;
+
+elevation
+740 m
+a. s. l.
+
+) (Fig.
+3 A
+),
+Peren District
+,
+Nagaland
+, collected by
+Abhijit Das
+and Bitupan Boruah on
+
+14 August 2021
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Medium-sized gecko,
+SVL
+at least
+68.8 mm
+in adult female; supralabials 9–12 and infralabials nine; 12 or 13 lamellae beneath the digit IV of manus; 17 lamellae beneath digit IV of pes; 17 feebly keeled and bluntly conical tubercles across mid dorsum and 32 paravertebral tubercles; 36 smooth mid-ventral scales between ventrolateral folds; at least 10 small precloacal pores in female; head on top pale-brown with purplish tinge; dark-brown postorbital stripe continuing to above the ear opening; a dark-brown cross bar with irregular edges on nape; indistinct pale-yellow patch on occipital region; dorsally and laterally neck and back pale yellowish-brown with dark-brown irregular reticulation.
+
+
+
+
+
+Description of
+holotype
+.
+
+
+
+Holotype
+well preserved except an incision below left axilla ventrolaterally. Snout-vent length
+68.8 mm
+. Head moderately large (
+HL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.26), dorsoventrally depressed, longer than width (
+HW
+/
+HL
+= 0.65), oval, distinct from neck, broader at occipital region; snout tip rounded in both dorsal and lateral view; loreal region convex; canthus rostralis rounded, indistinct; interorbital space flat; a longitudinal furrow on dorsal surface of the snout; snout short (
+SO
+/
+HL
+= 0.39), longer than orbit (
+OD
+/
+SO
+= 0.59); nostril rounded, opening directed posterolaterally; ear opening oblique; scales on head heterogeneous, largest on snout and loreal region, posteriorly smaller in upper eyelid, interorbital space and occipital region, granular juxtaposed; scales on upper eyelids heterogeneous, supraciliaries outwardly sharp giving serrated appearance in dorsal view, size anteriorly and posteriorly decreases, largest at the anterodorsal region; rostral wide, a short groove at the middle on top; rostral connected with nasals, supranasals and first supralabials; a single scale between the supranasals, larger than the rest of the granular snout scales; granular scales at parietal, occipital and temporal region intermixed with slightly larger rounded and bluntly conical granular tubercles starting from the level of posterior margin of the upper eyelids, smaller in parietal region, size increases towards nape; supralabial 12 on right side and nine on left side, supralabials count up to midorbit is eight on right side and six on left side, size decreases towards angle of jaw; a series of narrow, enlarged scales above the supralabials between nostril and anterior orbital border; mental triangular, connected with first infralabials and inner postmentals; nine infralabials on both side, size decreases towards angle of jaw; inner pair of postmentals are larger than the outer postmentals; posterior margin of the inner postmentals bordered by eight granular scales of different size; two rows of slightly enlarged, narrow scales, larger than gular scales present along the infralabials starting below the outer postmentals, posteriorly size decreases; gular scales granular, juxtaposed, homogeneous, size increases towards the throat where they become imbricate.
+
+
+Habitus slender (
+BW
+/
+SVL
+= 0.16,
+TRL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.47), dorsoventrally depressed; dorsal scales granular, rounded, heterogeneous, intermixed with densely placed rounded, weakly keeled and bluntly conical tubercles, irregularly arranged, continues to seventh segment of the tail, size increases towards posterior body and pronounced at the base of tail; 17 dorsal tubercles across mid dorsum; 32 paravertebral tubercles; ventrolateral fold weak; ventral scales larger than those of dorsal, flat, smooth, cycloid, subimbricate to imbricate, largest on posterior part of the belly, 36 mid-ventral scales between ventrolateral folds; 10 small precloacal pores arranged in an inverted “
+V
+” shaped continuous series, followed by a series eight unpored, enlarged scales below it.
+
+
+Forelimbs and hindlimbs slender (
+FL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.14,
+CL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.18); digits strongly inflected at the joints, all bearing large recurved claw and enlarged subdigital lamellae; lamellae count beneath digit IV of right and left manus (given as basal + distal) is 5 + 7 and 5 + 8 respectively; lamellae count beneath digit IV of both right and left pes (given as basal + distal) is 8 + 9; dorsal scales on forelimbs heterogeneous in size; hind arm scales smooth and subimbricate; forearm scales small and granular towards proximal and towards distal end it is smooth, cycloid and imbricate; forearm scales intermixed with enlarged feebly keeled tubercles; dorsal scales of hindlimbs heterogeneous, intermixed with densely placed large, rounded and bluntly conical tubercles; scales on inner lateral and dorsolateral side of the thighs smooth, large and imbricate, rest of the scales are granular; scales on tibia are small, granular juxtaposed; ventral scales of forelimbs granular, juxtaposed, mostly homogeneous; scales on palm heterogeneous in shape and size, granular juxtaposed; ventral scales of hind limbs smaller than those of belly, smooth, cycloid and subimbricate; scales on the knee, above cloaca and on thigh below the level of precloacal pores smaller and granular; scales on soles heterogeneous, granular, juxtaposed to subimbricate.
+
+
+Tail complete, posterior
+6 mm
+regenerated (
+TL
+=
+64 mm
+), slender, gradually tapering towards tip; tail segments indistinct; dorsal scales small, granular, juxtaposed at the base, posteriorly size of the scales increases, flat, smooth, subimbricate, heterogeneous in shape and size; enlarged feebly keeled scales up to seventh segment of the tail, those on basal segment are pronounced; subcaudal scales smooth, subimbricate, wider than that of dorsal, heterogeneous in shape and size; no enlarged plate like series of subcaudal scales; four bluntly conical spurs on both sides of the tail base.
+
+
+
+
+Colouration in life.
+
+
+Head on top pale-brown with purplish tinge, indistinct brown irregular spots on occipital region; a short brown streak behind the posterior corner of the upper eyelid; a broad, dark-brown postorbital stripe continuing to above the ear opening; area between these two postorbital streaks is paler than dorsal head colour; an indistinct brown loreal stripe covering the nasal and an indistinct pale stripe above it; indistinct pale-yellow patch on occipital region; lips and mandibular region paler with indistinct yellow spots; dorsally and laterally neck and back pale yellowish-brown with dark-brown irregular reticulation starting from neck to sacrum; a dark-brown cross bar with irregular edges on nape; limbs pale-yellowish-brown with dark-brown reticulation; digits with alternative dark-brown and pale-yellow bars; tail with alternative 11 dark and 10 light bars in the original part, dark bars posteriorly more darker and broader; light bars posteriorly more whitish, first bar at the base of tail broken into two spots; fourth and fifth bar connected on left side; ventrally head, trunk and limbs whitish; tail with irregular brown and pale-yellow patches (Fig.
+5 I
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype of
+
+Cyrtodactylus barailensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+(WII-ADR 971).
+A
+dorsal and
+B
+ventral view of the whole body;
+C
+dorsal,
+D
+ventral, and
+E
+lateral view of head;
+F
+dorsal tubercles on trunk;
+G
+ventral view of left manus, and
+H
+left pes.
+I
+
+C. barailensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+in life. Scale bar: 10 mm.
+
+
+
+
+
+Colouration in preservative.
+
+Top of head pale-greyish-brown; neck, back, limbs and tail dorsally light-grey with dark-brown markings; marking pattern visible as those in life condition; ventrally whitish with brown specks on tail.
+
+
+
+Comparison.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus barailensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+differs from
+
+C. aaronbaueri
+
+by fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+17 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+22–28), 10 precloacal pores (vs. 6–8 pitted precloacal scales in female); differs from
+
+C. agarwali
+
+by fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+17 (vs. 21–25); differs from
+
+C. aunglini
+
+by fewer mid-ventral scale rows,
+
+MVSR
+
+36 (vs.
+
+MVSR
+
+47–49), 32 paravertebral tubercle (vs.
+
+PVT
+
+36–45), 17 dorsal tubercle rows (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+21–26); differs from
+
+C. bengkhuaiai
+
+by having fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+17 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+22–26), 10 precloacal pores (vs. 6–8 pitted precloacal scales in females); differs from
+
+C. brevidactylus
+
+by fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+17 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+27–30), fewer paravertebral tubercles,
+PVT
+32 (vs.
+
+PVT
+
+38–42), enlarged dark blotches on head and dorsum absent (vs. large dark blotches on dorsum between nape and sacrum); differs from
+
+C. chrysopylos
+
+by presence of precloacal pores (vs.
+PcP
+absent in female), fewer mid-ventral scales,
+
+MVSR
+
+36 (vs.
+
+MVSR
+
+37–55); differs from
+
+C. dianxiensis
+
+by smaller body size,
+SVL
+68.8 mm
+(vs.
+
+SVL
+
+75 mm
+), presence of precloacal pores (vs.
+PcP
+absent in female), fewer subdigital lamellae, 12 or 13 under fourth finger and 16 under fourth toe (vs. 16 or 17 under fourth finger and 19 or 20 under fourth toe); differs from
+
+C. gansi
+
+by fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+17 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+20–25), ventrolateral fold present on trunk (vs. absent), fewer precloacal pores,
+PcP
+10 (vs.
+PcP
+13 in
+female); differs from
+
+C. jaintiaensis
+
+by much smaller body size,
+SVL
+68.8 mm
+(vs.
+
+SVL
+
+96.2 mm
+in female), fewer mid-ventral scale rows,
+
+MVSR
+
+36 (vs.
+
+MVSR
+
+40–42), fewer precloacal pores,
+PcP
+10 (vs. 12
+PcP
+in female); differs from
+
+C. kiphire
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+by the number of paravertebral tubercles 32 (vs.
+
+PVT
+
+26 or 29); differs from
+
+C. lungleiensis
+
+by fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+17 (vs. 24–28), 10 precloacal pores (vs. 5–7 pitted precloacal scales in females); differs from
+
+C. montanus
+
+by fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+17 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+21–23), fewer paravertebral tubercles,
+PVT
+32 (vs.
+
+PVT
+
+37–43), precloacal pores present (vs.
+PcP
+absent in female); differs from
+
+C. myaleiktaung
+
+by fewer mid-ventral scale rows,
+
+MVSR
+
+36 (vs.
+
+MVSR
+
+57), precloacal pores present (vs.
+PcP
+absent), broad regular dark bands absent on dorsum (vs. present); differs from
+
+C. nagalandensis
+
+by presence of 10 precloacal pores (vs. six pitted precloacal scales in female), 32 paravertebral tubercles (vs.
+
+PVT
+
+35–37); differs from
+
+C. namtiram
+
+by fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+17 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+21); differs from
+
+C. ngopensis
+
+by presence of 10 precloacal pores in female, (vs. 0–6 pitted precloacal scales in female); differs from
+
+C. septentrionalis
+
+by fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+17 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+23 or 24), less paravertebral tubercles,
+PVT
+32 (vs.
+
+PVT
+
+38–42), 10 precloacal pores present (vs. 14 precloacal scales with indistinct depression in female); differs from
+
+C. siahaensis
+
+by fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+17 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+22–24), presence of precloacal pores in female (vs.
+PcP
+absent in female); differs from
+
+C. vairengtensis
+
+by the number of dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+17 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+22–23), 32 paravertebral tubercles (vs.
+
+PVT
+
+34–39), 10 precloacal pores present (vs. 5–9 precloacal pits in female). Morphological differences with other members of
+
+khasiensis
+
+group is presented in Table
+2
+.
+
+
+
+
+Sequence divergence.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus barailensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+has a high genetic divergence of 10.9 % from its closely related
+
+C. namtiram
+
+. With other members of the clade,
+
+C. kiphire
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+has a genetic divergence of 10.7 % and 22.3 % in the ND 2 gene.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The specific epithet is a toponym derived from the name of the hill range “ Barail ” where the
+type
+locality of the species lies.
+
+
+
+
+Suggested common name.
+
+Barail Hills bent-toed gecko.
+
+
+
+Distribution and natural history.
+
+
+During our two-day survey we only located a single individual of this species. Thus, the new species is currently known only from the
+type
+locality, in Peren District,
+Nagaland
+,
+India
+. We recorded this species on the trunk of a small tree at a height of approximately
+2 m
+from the ground in the Athibung Reserve Forest at approximately 20: 00 hrs on
+14 August 2021
+. The forest
+type
+is semi-evergreen with relatively little anthropogenic pressure.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/0C/80/CC/0C80CCAAF19651FE8C2A886279550539.xml b/data/0C/80/CC/0C80CCAAF19651FE8C2A886279550539.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b443c30057b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/0C/80/CC/0C80CCAAF19651FE8C2A886279550539.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+
+
+
+Four new Dolichopoda species from Greece, one Troglophilus new to Greece and new locality records (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alexiou, Sotiris
+0000-0003-1031-3003
+Korinthian Museum of Natural History, Isthmion 201, Korinthos 20100, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bakolitsas, Kostas
+0000-0003-3137-4024
+Laboratory of Natural Sciences 3 rd General Lyceum, 301 31 Agrinion, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Di Russo, Claudio
+0000-0002-1620-9592
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rampini, Mauro
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+103
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e121614
+5AA51752-2447-410B-A249-7B421D573CE4
+
+
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda gasparoi
+Rampini & Di Russo, 2008
+
+
+
+
+
+Material examined.
+
+
+
+GREECE
+-
+
+Ionian Islands
+
+•
+4 ♂
+; Νomos
+Lefkadas
+,
+Lefkada Isl.
+,
+cave Alatos
+;
+
+7 Aug. 2016
+
+;
+K. Bakolitsas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+•
+
+2 ♂
+; Νomos
+Lefkadas
+,
+Lefkada Isl.
+,
+cave Pouliezou
+;
+
+23 Aug. 2016
+
+;
+K. Bakolitsas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+•
+
+4 ♂
+; Νomos
+Lefkadas
+,
+Lefkada Isl.
+,
+cave Tsotsonia
+;
+
+25 Sept. 2016
+
+;
+K. Bakolitsas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Comment.
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda gasparoi
+
+is endemic to Lefkada Isl. (
+Rampini et al. 2008
+). Our records indicate that the species is widespread on the island.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/0F/6F/61/0F6F61B9C7765FC09DEBF74295D25A34.xml b/data/0F/6F/61/0F6F61B9C7765FC09DEBF74295D25A34.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0997c41205e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/0F/6F/61/0F6F61B9C7765FC09DEBF74295D25A34.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,544 @@
+
+
+
+Description of six new species of Cyrtodactylus Gray (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from northeastern India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Boruah, Bitupan
+0000-0001-8829-6069
+Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Narayanan, Surya
+0000-0001-9359-2815
+SM Sehgal Foundation Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Bangalore, Karnataka 560064, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Aravind, Neelavar Ananthram
+0000-0002-4515-8421
+SM Sehgal Foundation Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Bangalore, Karnataka 560064, India & Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya University, Derlakatte, Mangalore, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Lalronunga, Samuel
+0000-0002-7542-4815
+Holy Child Society, Nalkata, Tripura 799263, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Deepak, V.
+0000-0002-8826-9367
+Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK & School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE 1 7 RU, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Das, Abhijit
+0000-0002-5851-8457
+Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
+
+text
+
+
+Vertebrate Zoology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+453
+486
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/vz.74.e124752
+154CE236-EFA8-4411-834B-234A9B45A63F
+
+
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus ngengpuiensis
+Boruah, Narayanan, Lalronunga, Deepak & Das
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figure 7
+;
+Tables 2, S 2
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+.
+
+
+
+
+Adult male (WII-ADR 1057; Fig.
+7 A – J
+), from Ngengpui Wildlife Sanctuary (
+
+22.4906 ° N
+;
+92.7575 ° E
+
+;
+
+elevation
+160 m
+a. s. l.
+
+) (Fig.
+3 A
+),
+Lawngtlai District
+,
+Mizoram
+,
+India
+collected by
+Abhijit Das
+, Bitupan Boruah and Samuel Lalronunga on
+
+8 September 2021
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus ngengpuiensis
+
+
+sp. nov
+.
+
+A
+–
+J
+holotype (ADR-WII 1057),
+A
+dorsal and
+B
+ventral view of the whole body;
+C
+dorsal,
+D
+ventral, and
+E
+lateral view of head;
+F
+dorsal tubercles on trunk;
+G
+ventral view of right manus, and
+H
+right pes,
+I
+precloacofemoral pores;
+J
+holotype (ADR-WII 1057), and
+K
+paratype (WII-ADR 991) in life. Scale bar: 10 mm.
+J, K
+not to scale.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Paratypes
+.
+
+
+
+Two adult
+females (WII-ADR 991 and WII-ADR 1058) and
+one subadult
+female (WII-ADR 1059) collected from the same locality in Ngengpui Wildlife Sanctuary by the same team on
+7 and 8 September 2021
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Medium-sized gecko (
+SVL
+at least
+61.2 mm
+in adult male and
+72–74.1 mm
+in adult females); 9–12 supralabials; 8–11 infralabials; 18–20 bluntly conical and feebly keeled dorsal tubercles; 29–34 paravertebral tubercles; 38 or 39 midventral scale rows between the weak ventrolateral folds; no precloacal groove; at least 27 precloacofemoral pores in continuous series in male and 10–16 small precloacal pores in females; short dark-brown bars between a pair of dorsolateral stripes or enlarged irregular dark-brown spots present on dorsum.
+
+
+
+
+
+Description of
+holotype
+.
+
+
+
+Holotype
+well preserved except an incision below left axilla ventrolaterally. Snout-vent length
+61.2 mm
+. Head moderately large (
+HL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.27), dorsoventrally depressed, longer than width (
+HW
+/
+HL
+= 0.68), distinct from neck, broader at occipital region, snout tip rounded in both dorsal and lateral view, loreal region convex, canthus rostralis rounded, indistinct, interorbital space flat, a longitudinal furrow on dorsal surface of the snout, snout short (
+SO
+/
+HL
+= 0.4), longer than orbit (
+OD
+/
+SO
+= 0.66), nostril nearly rounded, opening directed posterolaterally, ear opening oval and oblique, scales on head heterogeneous, largest on snout and loreal region, posteriorly smaller in upper eyelid, interorbital space and occipital region, granular juxtaposed, scales on upper eyelids heterogeneous, supraciliaries outwardly sharp giving serrated appearance in dorsal view, size anterior and posterior end decreases, rostral wide, a short groove at the middle on top, rostral connected with nasals, supranasals, an internasal and first supralabials, two scales between the supranasals, larger than the rest of the granular snout scales, granular scales at parietal region and occipital region intermixed with slightly large rounded granular tubercles, dense in occipital and temporal region and size increases towards nape, nine supralabials on right and 10 on left side, size decreases towards angle of jaw, supralabials up to midorbit seven on right and eight on left side, a series of narrow and slightly elongated scales above the supralabials between nostril and anterior border of the orbit, mental as wide as rostral, triangular, connected with first infralabials, inner postmentals, nine infralabials on both side, size decreases towards angle of jaw, first infralabials connected with mental, second infralabial, inner and outer postmentals, inner pair of postmentals are larger than the outer postmentals, posterior margin of the inner postmentals bordered by seven granular scales of different size, two or three rows of enlarged scales along the infralabials starting below the outer postmentals, posteriorly size of those decreases, elongated and narrow, rest of the gular scales are small, granular juxtaposed, homogeneous, size increases towards the throat where they become imbricate.
+
+
+Habitus slender (
+BW
+/
+SVL
+= 0.17,
+TRL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.41), dorsoventrally depressed, dorsal scales granular, rounded, heterogeneous, intermixed with rounded, weakly keeled and bluntly conical tubercles irregularly arranged, starting from occipital region to seventh segment of the tail, size increases towards posterior body, pronounced at sacrum and base of the tail, 18 dorsal tubercles across mid dorsum, 29 paravertebral tubercles, ventrolateral fold weak, ventral scales larger than those of dorsal, flat, smooth, cycloid subimbricate to imbricate, largest on belly, 39 mid-ventral scales between ventrolateral fold, 27 precloacal femoral (
+PcFP
+) pores in a continuous series (Fig.
+7 I
+), followed by eight unpored, large scales below the
+PcFP
+at the middle.
+
+
+Forelimbs and hindlimbs slender (
+FL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.14,
+CL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.19); digits strongly inflected at the joints, all bearing large recurved claw, enlarged subdigital lamellae; lamellae beneath digit IV of right and left manus (given as basal + distal) is 5 + 8 and 5 + 9 respectively; lamellae beneath digit IV of right and left pes (given as basal + distal) is 4 + 10 and 5 + 10 respectively; dorsal scales on forelimbs heterogeneous, granular juxtaposed; dorsal scales of hindlimbs heterogeneous, granular, intermixed with densely placed large, rounded and bluntly conical tubercles, scales on inner lateral side of the thighs near knee are subimbricate; ventral scales of forelimbs granular, juxtaposed, mostly homogeneous; scales on palm heterogeneous in shape and size, granular; scales on ventral side of hindlimbs nearly equal to those of belly, smooth, cycloid and subimbricate, but on the knee, above cloaca and on thigh below the level of precloacal pores are smaller and granular; scales on soles heterogeneous, granular, juxtaposed to subimbricate.
+
+
+Tail complete (
+TL
+=
+70 mm
+), slender, gradually tapering towards tip, segments indistinct, dorsal scales granular, juxtaposed, flat, smooth, heterogeneous in shape and size; enlarged feebly keeled scales up to eight segments of the tail, those on basal segment are pronounced; subcaudal scales smooth, subimbricate, wider than that of dorsal, heterogeneous in shape and size; no enlarged plate like series of subcaudal scales.
+
+
+
+
+Colouration in life.
+
+
+Fig.
+7 J
+. Top of head pale-brown with indistinct pale-cream coloured spots on anterior part, a few slightly dark-brown patches on upper eyelids, temporal and occipital region; supraciliary yellowish-brown; dark-brown postocular streak on each side which continues dorsolaterally along neck and trunk to tail base, on right side this stripe is disjunct; a pale-cream coloured steak on each side of the dark-brown post orbital streak; an indistinct brown stripe along loreal region and a pale-cream coloured streak above it; upper lip with irregular brown and pale-yellow spots; a pair of dark-brown stripe with irregular edge on neck interspaced by an elongated pale-cream coloured patch, posterior ends of these stripes are connected; an enlarged dark-brown spot at the middle of nape; a pair of narrow pale-cream coloured stripe on neck above the lateral dark-brown stripe running up to slightly behind the level of axilla; dorsum pale-brown with seven irregular shaped and sized, broad dark-brown cross bars, these bars posteriorly edged with narrow cream coloured patch, first two cross bars are shorter than the rests; a few enlarged whitish spots along lateral side of the trunk; dorsally limbs pale-brown intermixed with slightly darker spots and light patches; dorsally tail with alternating slightly dark-brown broad bands and narrow pale-cream coloured bands of irregular shape and size; spurs cream coloured; ventrally head and trunk whitish with pinkish tinge and scales with brown marbling; some scales above and below the cloaca are pale-yellow; tail with slightly dense brown marbling.
+
+
+
+
+Colouration in preservative.
+
+Dorsal and ventral colour nearly the same as that of in life; dorsal markings visible as that of life condition.
+
+
+
+Morphological variation.
+
+
+Details of the variations in morphometric and meristic characters of the type series are provided in Table S 2. Apart from these dorsal markings among the
+paratypes
+slightly varied. In the
+two paratypes
+(WII-ADR 1058 and WII-ADR 1059), dorsal bands are broken mid dorsally giving the appearance of enlarged spots (Fig. S 2). Precloacal pores in female are smaller than that of male.
+
+
+
+
+Comparison.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus ngengpuiensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+can be differentiated from the members of the
+
+C. khasiensis
+
+clade (except
+
+C. ayeyarwadyensis
+
+,
+
+C. guwahatiensis
+
+,
+
+C. karsticola
+
+and
+
+C. tripuraensis
+
+) by the presence of precloacofemoral pores in male (vs. no femoral pores in male of
+
+C. agarwali
+
+,
+
+C. exercitus
+
+,
+
+C. kazirangaensis
+
+,
+
+C. khasiensis
+
+,
+
+C. septentrionalis
+
+,
+
+C. urbanus
+
+).
+
+Cyrtodactylus ngengpuiensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+differs from
+
+C. ayeyarwadyensis
+
+by presence of tiny precloacal pores in female,
+PcP
+10–16 (vs.
+PcP
+absent in female); differs from
+
+C. bapme
+
+by presence of 10–16 precloacal pores in female (vs. 0–13 pitted precloacal scales), dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+18 or 20 (vs. 21–24); differs from
+
+C. guwahatiensis
+
+by fewer preclocaofemoral pores,
+PcFP
+27 (vs.
+PcFP
+35–39),
+PcFP
+in a continuous series (vs. 26
+PcFP
+interrupted by 11 unpored scales in
+holotype
+
+C. guwahatiensis
+
+),
+PcP
+present in females (vs.
+PcP
+absent in females), higher mid-ventral scale rows,
+
+MVSR
+
+38–39 (
+
+MVSR
+
+vs. 30–35), fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+18–20 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+21–24); differs from
+
+C. karsticola
+
+by fewer precloacal femoral pores in male,
+PcFP
+27 (vs.
+PcFP
+34–38), less number of dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+18–20 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+21–24), fewer paravertebral tubercles,
+PVT
+29–34 (vs.
+
+PVT
+
+34–39); differs from
+
+C. tripuraensis
+
+by fewer precloacal femoral pores in male,
+PcFP
+27 (vs.
+PcFP
+29–37) and less number of precloacal pores,
+PcP
+10–16 in
+female (vs.
+PcP
+19–29 in
+female). Morphological differences with other members of
+
+khasiensis
+
+group is presented in Table
+2
+.
+
+
+
+
+Sequence divergence.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus ngengpuiensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+has a moderate genetic divergence of 4.1–6.6 % from its closely related
+
+C. ayeyarwadyensis
+
+, 4.2–6.0 % from
+
+C. tripuraensis
+
+. With other members of the clade,
+
+C. ngengpuiensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+has a genetic divergence between 8.6 % and 15.7 % in the ND 2 gene. The intraspecific divergence is between the two samples of
+
+C. ngengpuiensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+is 0.8 %.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The specific epithet is a toponym derived from the name “ Ngengpui Wildlife Sanctuary ” of
+Mizoram state
+from where the
+type
+series of the species were collected.
+
+
+
+
+Suggested common name.
+
+Ngengpui bent-toed gecko.
+
+
+
+Distribution and natural history.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus ngengpuiensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+new species is currently only known from the
+type
+locality, the Ngengpui Wildlife Sanctuary, Lawngtlai District,
+Mizoram
+,
+India
+. The forest is characterised as tropical semi-evergreen to moist evergreen forest. The forest is dominated by
+
+Dipterocarpus
+spp.
+
+, palms, canes and rattans. Individuals of
+
+C. ngengpuiensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+were collected during
+6–9 September 2021
+at 21: 00–22: 00 hrs. Individuals were recorded in bamboo thickets, on tree buttresses and trunks, and amongst ferns and rocks along the banks of evergreen forest streams.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/2C/C6/1F/2CC61FD327F05CD5990514CCCF1D0F2B.xml b/data/2C/C6/1F/2CC61FD327F05CD5990514CCCF1D0F2B.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f064d089481
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/2C/C6/1F/2CC61FD327F05CD5990514CCCF1D0F2B.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+
+
+
+Four new Dolichopoda species from Greece, one Troglophilus new to Greece and new locality records (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alexiou, Sotiris
+0000-0003-1031-3003
+Korinthian Museum of Natural History, Isthmion 201, Korinthos 20100, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bakolitsas, Kostas
+0000-0003-3137-4024
+Laboratory of Natural Sciences 3 rd General Lyceum, 301 31 Agrinion, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Di Russo, Claudio
+0000-0002-1620-9592
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rampini, Mauro
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+103
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e121614
+5AA51752-2447-410B-A249-7B421D573CE4
+
+
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda lustriae
+Rampini & Di Russo, 2008
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 10
+
+
+
+
+Material examined.
+
+
+
+GREECE
+–
+
+Thessalia
+
+•
+2 ♂
+,
+2 ♀
+;
+Nomos Karditsas
+,
+Mt. Agrapha
+,
+cave Gaki
+;
+
+9 Dec. 2018
+
+;
+S. Alexiou
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+•
+
+1 ♀
+;
+Nomos Karditsas
+, Μt.
+Agrapha
+, refuge ;
+
+8 Oct. 2018
+
+;
+L. Makrostergios
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+,
+3 ♀
+;
+Nomos Trikalon
+,
+Anthousa
+,
+Monastery of Galaktotrophousa
+;
+
+1 Aug. 2020
+
+; c.
+
+1150 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+G. Kofinas
+leg. (ΚΜΝΗ). -
+
+Sterea Ellas
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♀
+;
+Nomos
+Εvritanias,
+Neraida
+,
+cave Patriarchis
+;
+
+13 Aug. 2021
+
+;
+K. Bakolitsas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+•
+
+2 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+;
+Nomos
+Εvritanias,
+cave Mesokomis
+;
+
+31 Aug. 2021
+
+; leg.
+K. Bakolitsas
+(
+KMNH
+)
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+,
+2 ♀
+;
+Nomos Etolias-Akarnanias
+,
+Stoa Acheloou
+, close to
+lake Kastrakiou
+;
+
+38 ° 49 ' 09.3 " N
+,
+021 ° 25 ' 16.8 " E
+
+;
+
+
+854 m
+
+.
+
+a. s. l ;
+K. Bakolitsas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda lustriae
+Rampini & Di Russo, 2008
+
+. Greece, Thessalia, Anthousa, Monastery of Galaktotrophousa, 1 Aug. 2020 (photo Kofinas).
+
+
+
+
+
+Comment.
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda lustriae
+
+was originally described from Μt. Pselovuni of Etolia-Akarnania. Two more populations were added in the following years: Mt. Vardousia Fokidos (
+Alexiou et al. 2014
+) and Pades
+Ipiros
+(Davranoglou et al. 2018). The new populations added here demonstrate the wide distribution of the species along the high altitudes of the Pindos mountain range (Fig.
+9
+), which may imply the more epigean biological circle of
+
+D. lustriae
+
+, as discussed at
+Davranoglou et al. (2021)
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/3C/20/D4/3C20D4471AEF59E7AEA36AB18B10B9B1.xml b/data/3C/20/D4/3C20D4471AEF59E7AEA36AB18B10B9B1.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9629c748dfc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/3C/20/D4/3C20D4471AEF59E7AEA36AB18B10B9B1.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+
+
+
+Four new Dolichopoda species from Greece, one Troglophilus new to Greece and new locality records (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alexiou, Sotiris
+0000-0003-1031-3003
+Korinthian Museum of Natural History, Isthmion 201, Korinthos 20100, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bakolitsas, Kostas
+0000-0003-3137-4024
+Laboratory of Natural Sciences 3 rd General Lyceum, 301 31 Agrinion, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Di Russo, Claudio
+0000-0002-1620-9592
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rampini, Mauro
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+103
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e121614
+5AA51752-2447-410B-A249-7B421D573CE4
+
+
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda giachinoi
+Rampini & Di Russo, 2008
+
+
+
+
+
+Material examined.
+
+
+
+GREECE
+•
+1 ♂
+,
+2 ♀
+;
+Sterea Ellas
+,
+Nomos Etolias-Akarnanias
+,
+Vonitsa
+,
+cave Likonikos
+;
+
+38 ° 50.354 ' N
+,
+20 ° 55.665 ' E
+
+;
+
+6 Jun. 2016
+
+;
+K. Bakolitsas
+leg.
+
+
+
+
+
+Comment.
+
+
+The species has been described recently from Megalo Spilio cave, at the northern side of Mt. Serekas (part of Mt. Akarnanika) and from an altitude of
+1000 m
+. a. s. l. (
+Rampini et al. 2008
+). The new locality extends the distribution of the species to the north, close to the Ionian Sea and away from the mountainous area of Akarnanika.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/47/87/EC/4787EC08A5C05EA795D1F245DF7E24EA.xml b/data/47/87/EC/4787EC08A5C05EA795D1F245DF7E24EA.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ea1419f7c5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/47/87/EC/4787EC08A5C05EA795D1F245DF7E24EA.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+
+
+
+Four new Dolichopoda species from Greece, one Troglophilus new to Greece and new locality records (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alexiou, Sotiris
+0000-0003-1031-3003
+Korinthian Museum of Natural History, Isthmion 201, Korinthos 20100, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bakolitsas, Kostas
+0000-0003-3137-4024
+Laboratory of Natural Sciences 3 rd General Lyceum, 301 31 Agrinion, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Di Russo, Claudio
+0000-0002-1620-9592
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rampini, Mauro
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+103
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e121614
+5AA51752-2447-410B-A249-7B421D573CE4
+
+
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda vandeli
+Boundou-Saltet, 1970
+
+
+
+
+
+Material examined.
+
+
+
+GREECE
+•
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+, 2 nymphs ;
+Sterea Ellas
+,
+Nomos
+Κorinthias,
+Mt. Gerania
+;
+
+38 ° 00 ' 40.0 " N
+,
+23 ° 03 ' 14.2 " E
+
+;
+
+23. May 2020
+
+;
+Kofinas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Comment.
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda vandeli
+
+was described from Hermes cave, Nomos Biotias, Orchomenos, near the village of Dionysos, at the north of the plane of Kopais. Subsequently it has been collected from two more caves of Kopais plane, near Akontio and Katavothra Aliartos, in addition to Mt. Elikon, Agia Triada cave and the north foothills of Mt. Parnassos (Ano Polydroso, cave Kontilospilia) (
+Alexiou et al. 2014
+;
+Di Russo et al. 2014
+). Our record is a significant expansion of the species range to the south (Fig.
+9
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution of
+
+D. lustriae
+Rampini & Di Russo, 2008
+
+and
+
+D. vandeli
+Boundou-Saltet, 1970
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/4F/2C/09/4F2C09B245EA582D97EE924BCB139AE8.xml b/data/4F/2C/09/4F2C09B245EA582D97EE924BCB139AE8.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6e06aa79a89
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/4F/2C/09/4F2C09B245EA582D97EE924BCB139AE8.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+
+
+
+Dickyyuella argentinensis a tentative new genus and species of Cardiochilinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) from the Neotropical region
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Kang, Ilgoo
+0000-0002-8501-1758
+Department of Entomology, Kyungpook National University, Sangju, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Sharkey, Michael J.
+0000-0001-6201-7340
+The Hymenoptera Institute, Redlands, CA, USA
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+1208
+
+
+165
+172
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1208.128640
+61FBFC75-F50A-46AC-BAA2-55F72847EC9E
+
+
+
+
+
+Dickyyuella argentinensis
+Kang & Sharkey
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Material examined.
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+.
+Argentina
+
+•
+♀
+,
+Tucumán
+Pr., ~
+3 km
+NW of
+Tapia
+;
+
+700 m
+
+,
+
+26 ° 33 ′ 54 ″ S
+,
+65 ° 17 ′ 22 ″ W
+
+;
+
+19. iii. 2003
+
+;
+J. Heraty. Will
+be housed in
+UCRC
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Body length
+:
+3.7 mm
+.
+Length of forewing
+:
+3.3 mm
+.
+Length of hind wing
+:
+2.6 mm
+.
+
+Head
+.
+
+Antenna relatively thick with 24 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.5 × as long as second. Median width of eye 0.3 × longer than median width of gena in lateral view (0.3: 0.1). Width of anterior ocellus 0.9 × longer than distance between posterior ocelli (0.08: 0.09). Apex of clypeus convex with a smooth apical margin. Maxillary palpus 5 - segmented; labial palpus 4 - segmented. Occipital carina well developed dorsally, absent ventrally (This may be a pseudo-occipital carina, i. e., secondarily derived, as is found in some Agathidinae, e. g.,
+
+Marjoriella
+spp.
+
+). Most of head with weak microsculpture contrasting sharply with the smooth, glabrous occiput. Malar suture present. Interantennal space with a bicarinate ridge. Median ocellus surrounded medially and laterally by a smooth, curved ridge.
+
+Mesosoma
+.
+
+Pronotum bilobed anteriorly with a transverse plate dorsally. Notauli deeply impressed and entirely costate. Median lobe of mesoscutum bilobed. Scutellar sulcus deep with a median carina; median width of scutellar sulcus
+0.4 mm
+; median length of scutellar sulcus
+0.1 mm
+; median length of scutellar sulcus 0.1 × longer than median length of mesosoma in dorsal view (0.1: 0.9). Scutellum smooth and flat. Postscutellar depression absent. Propleuron lacking a posterolateral lobe. Epicnemial carina strong and complete. Precoxal sulcus well defined with ~ 5 costulae. Propodeum rugose with a large, well-defined median areola.
+
+Wings
+.
+
+Forewing M + Cu entirely tubular; 1 RS vein long; second submarginal cell large and greatly compressed apically, trapezoid, maximum length of the cell 1.6 × longer than its maximum height (0.46: 0.28); apical abscissa of RS entirely nebulous and almost straight, very slightly curved posteriorly; (RS + M) b about 3 × longer than m-cu vein; 1 M about 3 × longer than m-cu vein; anal crossvein indicated by a slight swelling on vein A. Hind wing unremarkable; lacking distinct claval lobe; veins M + Cu and M about equal in length; r crossvein absent.
+
+Legs
+.
+
+Midtibia 3.4 × longer than midbasitarsomere (0.64: 0.19). Hind femur 0.9 × longer than hind tibia (0.75: 0.84). Hind basitarsomere swollen. Tarsal claws rather large with pectinate base.
+
+Metasoma
+.
+
+Metasoma 1.1 × longer than mesosoma (1.70: 1.56). Spiracle of
+T
+1 on membranous laterotergite.
+T
+1 0.7 × longer than its apical width (0.63: 0.45), with carinate lateral margins; median area of
+T
+1 with an inverse Y-shaped depression. Remaining terga smooth and rather weakly sclerotized.
+T
+2 transverse, much wider than long. Hypopygium acute apically and not nearly reaching apex of metasoma. Ovipositor sheath about half as long as metasoma, strongly compressed laterally, with fine sparse setae. Ovipositor simple, slightly downcurved but otherwise unmodified.
+
+Color
+.
+
+Head and mesosoma mostly light brown; antenna brown, foreleg and midleg entirely pale, hind tibia and tarsus yellow medially, hind claw brown. Metasoma mostly pale except ovipositor sheath, ovipositor sheath light brown basally, apically dark brown. Wings entirely infuscate.
+
+
+Male.
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+
+Biology.
+
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Neotropics.
+
+Dickyyuella argentinensis
+Kang & Sharkey
+
+,
+sp. nov.
+, is known from Tapia,
+Tucumán
+Pr.,
+Argentina
+, near Rio
+India
+Muerta.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The species is named after the collecting country, “
+Argentina
+”.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/50/7D/97/507D9749BFBD54018DADAD5538DE287C.xml b/data/50/7D/97/507D9749BFBD54018DADAD5538DE287C.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..efce04d7849
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/50/7D/97/507D9749BFBD54018DADAD5538DE287C.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
+
+
+
+Description of six new species of Cyrtodactylus Gray (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from northeastern India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Boruah, Bitupan
+0000-0001-8829-6069
+Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Narayanan, Surya
+0000-0001-9359-2815
+SM Sehgal Foundation Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Bangalore, Karnataka 560064, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Aravind, Neelavar Ananthram
+0000-0002-4515-8421
+SM Sehgal Foundation Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Bangalore, Karnataka 560064, India & Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya University, Derlakatte, Mangalore, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Lalronunga, Samuel
+0000-0002-7542-4815
+Holy Child Society, Nalkata, Tripura 799263, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Deepak, V.
+0000-0002-8826-9367
+Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK & School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE 1 7 RU, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Das, Abhijit
+0000-0002-5851-8457
+Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
+
+text
+
+
+Vertebrate Zoology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+453
+486
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/vz.74.e124752
+154CE236-EFA8-4411-834B-234A9B45A63F
+
+
+
+
+Expanded description of
+
+Cyrtodactylus cayuensis
+Li, 2007
+
+
+
+
+
+Figures 10
+,
+S 3; Tables 2, S 4
+
+
+
+
+Chresonyms.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus khasiensis cayuensis
+
+–
+Li (2007)
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus cayuensis
+
+– Agarwal et al. (2018: 337)
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus arunachalensis
+
+–
+Mirza et al. (2021)
+
+
+
+
+Materials examined.
+
+
+(Fig.
+10
+).
+Arunachal Pradesh
+:
+one male
+(WII-ADR 1219) and
+one female
+(WII-ADR 1218) collected from Balek village (
+
+28.0624 ° N
+;
+95.2721 ° E
+
+; elevation
+450 m
+a. s. l.), East Siang District on
+29 October 2021
+by Bitupan Boruah;
+one male
+(WII-ADR 1213) collected from Ramsing (
+
+28.6563 ° N
+;
+94.9795 ° E
+
+; elevation
+600 m
+a. s. l.), Mouling National Park, Upper Siang District on
+27 October 2021
+by Bitupan Boruah;
+one female
+(WII-ADR 1199) collected from Syrnyup stream (
+
+28.5340 ° N
+;
+95.0305 ° E
+
+; elevation
+890 m
+a. s. l.), Jengging, Mouling National Park, Upper Siang District on
+26 October 2021
+by Bitupan Boruah;
+two males
+(WII-ADR 695 and WII-ADR 696) and
+two females
+(WII-ADR 697 and WII-ADR 698) collected from Potin (
+
+27.3478 ° N
+,
+93.8497 ° E
+
+, elevation
+900 m
+a. s. l.), Lower Subansiri District on
+5 October 2019
+by Bitupan Boruah;
+one female
+(WII-ADR 3017) collected near Glaw lake (
+
+27.6960 ° N
+;
+96.4456 ° E
+
+; elevation
+1200 m
+a. s. l.), Kamlang Tiger Reserve, Lohit District on
+2 September 2022
+by Abhijit Das, Bitupan Boruah and Naitik G. Patel;
+one male
+(WII-ADR 1682) and
+one female
+(WII-ADR 1681) collected from Ezengo (
+
+28.1565 ° N
+;
+95.8638 ° E
+
+; elevation
+560 m
+a. s. l.), Lower Dibang Valley District on
+3 August 2022
+By Bitupan Boruah;
+three females
+(WII-ADR 453, WII-ADR 454 and WII-ADR 459) collected from Jengging (
+
+28.5499 ° N
+;
+95.0537 ° E
+
+; elevation
+760 m
+a. s. l.) by Abhijit Das on
+5 October 2018
+;
+one female
+(WII-ADR 478) and
+one male
+(WII-ADR 473) collected from
+6 km
+northwest to Pasighat (
+
+28.0945 ° N
+;
+95.2682 ° E
+
+; elevation
+410 m
+a. s. l.) by Abhijit Das on
+2 October 2018
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus cayuensis
+
+from India showing the variation in dorsal marking pattern.
+A
+WII-ADR 1219 (Balek),
+B
+WII-ADR 1681 (Ezengo),
+C
+WII-ADR 1199 (Jengging),
+D
+WII-ADR 1218 (Balek),
+E
+WII-ADR 454 (Jengging),
+F
+WII-ADR 1213 (Ramsing),
+G
+WII-ADR 698 (Potin),
+H
+WII-ADR 3017 (Glaw lake),
+I
+precloacal pores in WII-ADR 698, and
+J
+precloacal pores in WII-ADR 478. Scale bar: 10 mm.
+I
+,
+J
+not to scale.
+
+
+
+
+
+Revised diagnosis.
+
+
+Medium-sized gecko,
+SVL
+61.2–83.5 mm
+in adult males and
+SVL
+59.4–83.6 mm
+in adult females; 8–13 supralabials and 8–12 infralabials; 18–26 rows of bluntly conical and feebly keeled enlarged tubercles across mid-dorsum; 27–38 paravertebral tubercles between the level of axilla and groin; 28–44 mid-ventral scales; 13–21 subdigital lamellae beneath the fourth digit of manus; 11–23 subdigital lamellae beneath the fourth digit of pes; colouration and marking pattern variable; dorsally greyish-brown, pale-brown or pale-yellowish-brown; five to eight dark-brown bands consisting of irregular shaped and sized enlarged spots on back between axilla and groin, or dorsum with dark-brown reticulation; tail with 9–13 dark and 9–12 light bands alternatively arranged on top.
+
+
+
+
+Description based on newly collected materials.
+
+
+Medium-sized gecko,
+SVL
+61.2–75.1 mm
+in males (n = 6) and
+SVL
+59.4–83.6 mm
+in females (n = 11); head moderately large (
+HL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.25–0.28), dorsoventrally depressed, longer than width (
+HW
+/
+HL
+= 0.67–0.75), distinct from neck, broader at occipital region; snout rounded in both dorsal and lateral view; loreal region convex; canthus rostralis rounded, indistinct; interorbital space flat, a longitudinal furrow on dorsal surface of the snout, snout short (
+SO
+/
+HL
+= 0.38–0.43), longer than orbit (
+OD
+/
+SO
+= 0.49–0.78); nostril opening directed posterolaterally; ear opening oblique; scales on head heterogeneous, largest on snout and loreal region, posteriorly smaller in upper eyelid, interorbital space and occipital region, granular juxtaposed; scales on upper eyelids heterogeneous; supraciliaries outwardly sharp giving serrated appearance in dorsal view, size anteriorly and posteriorly decreases; rostral wide, a short groove at the middle on top; granular scales at parietal region and occipital region intermixed with slightly large rounded granular tubercles, dense in occipital and temporal region and size increases towards nape; 9–13 supralabials present, size decreases towards angle of jaw; a series of scales, slightly larger than the loreal scales present above the supralabials; 8–12 infralabials, size decreases towards angle of jaw; two or three rows of slightly enlarged and narrow scales along the infralabials, posteriorly size of those decreases; rest of the gular scales are small, granular juxtaposed, nearly homogeneous, scales on throat are imbricate.
+
+
+Habitus slender (
+BW
+/
+SVL
+= 0.16–0.22,
+TRL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.41–0.47), dorsoventrally depressed; dorsal scales granular, heterogeneous, intermixed with rounded, weakly keeled and bluntly conical tubercles irregularly arranged, continuing up to third or fifth segment of the tail, size of the tubercles increases towards posterior body, pronounced at sacrum and base of the tail, posteriormost rows indistinctly keeled; 15–21 rows of dorsal tubercles across mid dorsum; 27–38 paravertebral tubercles; ventrolateral fold present; ventral scales on chest and belly larger than those of dorsal, flat, smooth, cycloid, subimbricate to imbricate; 34–44 mid ventral scales; seven or nine distinct precloacal pores in male and 7–10 small precloacal pores in female;
+PcP
+followed by three to six unpored enlarged scales below.
+
+
+Forelimbs and hindlimbs slender (
+FL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.13–0.15,
+CL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.16–0.18); digits strongly inflected at the joints, all bearing large recurved claw and enlarged subdigital lamellae, dorsal scales on forelimbs heterogeneous, granular juxtaposed, smooth and subimbricate at distal end of forearm; forearm intermixed with a few rounded, large tubercles; dorsal scales of hindlimbs granular intermixed with large, rounded, bluntly conical tubercles; thigh scales towards lateral and dorsolateral side are smooth and subimbricate; ventral scales of forelimbs granular, juxtaposed, mostly homogeneous; scales on palm heterogeneous, granular juxtaposed; scales on ventral side of hindlimbs slightly smaller than or nearly equal to those of belly, smooth, cycloid and subimbricate; scales on the knee, above cloaca and on thigh below the level of precloacal pores are smaller and granular; scales on soles heterogeneous, granular, juxtaposed to subimbricate.
+
+
+Tail slender (
+TL
+=
+58–97 mm
+), gradually tapering, segments indistinct; dorsal scales small, granular, juxtaposed at the base, posteriorly size increases, flat, smooth, subimbricate, heterogeneous in shape and size; large feebly keeled scales up to third to fifth segment of the tail, those on basal segment are pronounced and posterior rows with indistinct keel; subcaudal scales smooth, subimbricate, wider than that of dorsal, heterogeneous in shape and size; no enlarged plate like series of subcaudal scales; two to four bluntly conical spurs present at the base of the tail. Detailed morphological characteristics of the collected samples are provided in Table S 4.
+
+
+
+
+Sequence divergence.
+
+
+The intraspecific divergence within
+
+C. cayuensis
+
+ranges between 0.1–6.4 %. Among the two clades identified by
+bPTP
+, both clades have an intraspecific divergence between 0.1–4.3 % and 0.2–2.4 %, respectively. The divergence between these two clades range between 3–6.4 %.
+
+
+
+
+Colouration in life.
+
+Dorsal colour and marking pattern variable (Fig. S 3). Head and body greyish-brown, pale-brown to pale-yellowish-brown on top; head on top irregularly mottled with dark-brown, slightly enlarged dark-brown irregular patches may be present on occipital area; dark-brown postorbital stripe and loreal stripe present; a light stripe above loreal stripe and postorbital stripe may be visible; a few pale-yellow spots may be present on temporal and occipital region; supraciliary yellowish-brown; neck with short dark-brown streak with irregular edge or with irregular shaped patches; trunk dorsally with five to eight dark-brown bands consisting of irregular shaped and sized enlarged spots and posteriorly pale-yellowish or light-edged, these bands mid dorsally interrupted, or dorsum with dark-brown reticulation; limbs dorsally greyish-brown or pale-yellowish-brown or pale-brown with distinct or indistinct dark-brown reticulation; a dark-brown band on sacrum, band mid dorsally intersected; tail dorsally with 9–13 dark and 9–12 light bands alternatively arranged, bands are with irregular edged, anterior one or two dark bands may be mid dorsally intersected, dark bands are broad and light bands are comparatively narrow, dark bands are posteriorly becomes black or more dark-brown, while light bands become whitish; light bands may have a few dark-brown spots.
+
+
+
+Distribution and natural history.
+
+
+The
+type
+locality,
+Xizang
+(
+Tibet
+),
+China
+by
+
+C. cayuensis
+
+also appears to be widely distributed in
+Arunachal Pradesh
+,
+India
+(Fig.
+3 B
+), within an elevational range of
+410–1200 m
+a. s. l.
+
+Cyrtodactylus cayuensis
+
+is widespread in the foothills of
+Arunachal Pradesh
+from the western part of the state, at Seijusa (Pakke Tiger Reserve) to the eastern part (Kamlang Tiger Reserve) and it has successfully spread across major tributaries of the Brahmaputra River, i. e., the Subansiri, Siang, Dibang, Lohit up to at least north of Noa-Dihing. Populations of
+
+C. cayuensis
+
+have been recorded in degraded evergreen forest as well as in undisturbed semi-evergreen and evergreen forests.
+
+Cyrtodactylus cayuensis
+
+is particularly abundant in the vegetation close to the picturesque Glaw Lake in the Kamlang Tiger Reserve. We observed individuals at night on shrubs and bedrocks (sedimentary rock) along small forest streams. We also encountered them on small trees up to a 2.0 m inside the forest at Jengging, Kamlang Tiger Reserve and Mehao Wildlife Sanctuary.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/57/BD/0B/57BD0BA9537D57418BC12159A226F739.xml b/data/57/BD/0B/57BD0BA9537D57418BC12159A226F739.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8b4cb9afe86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/57/BD/0B/57BD0BA9537D57418BC12159A226F739.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
+
+
+
+Four new Dolichopoda species from Greece, one Troglophilus new to Greece and new locality records (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alexiou, Sotiris
+0000-0003-1031-3003
+Korinthian Museum of Natural History, Isthmion 201, Korinthos 20100, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bakolitsas, Kostas
+0000-0003-3137-4024
+Laboratory of Natural Sciences 3 rd General Lyceum, 301 31 Agrinion, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Di Russo, Claudio
+0000-0002-1620-9592
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rampini, Mauro
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+103
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e121614
+5AA51752-2447-410B-A249-7B421D573CE4
+
+
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda dirussoi
+Alexiou
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1
+,
+3
+,
+4
+,
+5
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+:
+GREECE
+•
+♂
+;
+Sterea Ellas
+,
+Nomos Etolias-Akarnanias
+,
+Skourtou
+,
+Geralexis cave
+;
+
+102 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+38 ° 38.150 ' N
+,
+21 ° 12.617 ' E
+
+;
+
+25 Nov. 2017
+
+;
+K. Bakolitsas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+Paratypes
+
+:
+GREECE
+•
+1 ♂
+,
+3 ♀
+; same data as for holotype
+
+.
+Other material
+:
+
+GREECE
+•
+2 ♂
+,
+6 ♀
+;
+Sterea Ellas
+,
+Nomos Etolias-Acarnanias
+,
+Gouria Aitolikou
+,
+cave Gouria
+;
+
+38 ° 27.383 ' N
+,
+21 ° 16.478 ' E
+
+;
+
+7 Jan. 2018
+
+;
+K. Bakolitsas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+The new taxon shows affinities with the other
+
+Dolichopoda
+species
+
+of the west Sterea Ellas,
+
+D. giachinoi
+Rampini & Di Russo, 2008
+
+and
+
+D. bakolitsasi
+Rampini &
+Di Russo, 2017
+
+as well as the species of the south
+Ionian Islands
+
+D. gasparoi
+Rampini & Di Russo, 2008
+
+,
+
+D. ithakii
+Rampini & Di Russo, 2008
+
+,
+
+D. pavesii
+Galvagni, 2002
+
+and
+
+D. patrizii
+Chopard, 1964
+
+. (Fig.
+4
+). The combination of the morphological characters of
+
+D. dirussoi
+
+sp. nov.
+is unique among the neighbouring species, with the most outstanding difference being the lack of a ridge or tubercles on the X tergite of males. Despite the obvious differences of the new species from
+
+D. bakolitsasi
+
+, especially in the shape of the lateral lobes of the X tergum, the two species stand out from the others by the strongly curved median process of the epiphallus.
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+Body pale brownish-yellow, legs elongated, hind femora unarmed. Fore tibiae with 3 spines on both sides of the ventral side, mid tibiae with 4 spines on both sides of the ventral side and hind tibiae with 20 spines on both sides of the dorsal side.
+
+X tergum (last abdominal tergite) (Fig.
+3 A
+) with two lateral lobes, lobes shallowly bilobed at apex. Lateral lobes separated by a broad concavity, broader than the lobes, inner side of the concavity slightly more thickened.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution of
+
+Dolichopoda
+species
+
+at W Sterea Ellas and S Ionian Islands.
+
+
+Subgenital plate convex, with a wide median incision that runs for half of the total length; lateral lobes rather rounded, styli short.
+
+Epiphallus sclerotized, with the median process thickened to about 2 / 3 of its length, strongly curved and acute (Fig.
+3 C, D
+).
+
+Measurements (length in mm): body 16, pronotum 3.4, fore femora 17, middle femora 18, hind femora 23.
+
+Female
+: Characters similar to male. Subgenital plate large, triangular with a rounded apex. Sternite VII with a very large protuberance covering the anterior half of the sternite (Fig.
+3 B
+), in the shape of flattened triangle with thickened margins and rounded apex. Ovipositor
+14 mm
+in length, almost straight, the inferior valves with 19 apical denticles.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+The new species is named after our dear friend and co-author Claudio Di Russo, who introduced S. A. into the study of Greek cave crickets thirteen years ago.
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype of
+
+Omorgus capillaceus
+Scholtz, 1990
+
+.
+A.
+Habitus in dorsal view;
+B.
+Habitus in lateral view;
+C.
+Labels. Photos by Vanessa Verdecia (
+CMNCH
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+capillaceus
+
+was one of the species described by Scholtz in 1990 during his monographic revision of the
+Trogidae
+of South America. This species was identified in the collection of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History (
+
+CMNCH
+
+) and described based on a single female specimen, distinguished by its morphological differences from other South American species. Scholtz noted that
+
+O. capillaceus
+
+was similar to
+
+O. monachus
+(
+Herbst, 1790
+)
+
+and
+
+O. fuliginosus
+(
+Robinson, 1941
+)
+
+, both of which are North American species. However, he highlighted a diagnostic feature that distinguishes
+
+O. capillaceus
+
+from other similar-looking species: the absence of a velutinous covering on the elytral disc, which is present in its relatives.
+
+
+Upon reviewing the
+holotype
+of
+
+O. capillaceus
+
+, it became evident that the specimen is merely a worn variation of
+
+O. fuliginosus
+
+. While we concur with Scholtz’s observation of the glabrous elytral disc, this feature alone is insufficient for distinguishing
+Trogidae
+species without considering male genitalia.
+Trogidae
+specimens often exhibit significant intraspecific variation, and it is not uncommon to encounter specimens that are partially or entirely glabrous (or worn) in collections (V. Costa-Silva, personal observation).
+
+
+Another factor that may have led Scholtz to describe a new species is the specimen’s locality:
+Bogota
+,
+Colombia
+. The
+holotype
+of
+
+O. capillaceus
+
+was associated with the label number “ 2275 ” (Fig.
+12 C
+), which corresponds to specimen from the Henry Klages Collection, acquired by the
+
+CMNCH
+
+on
+May 28, 1903
+(Robert Androw, personal communication to
+VCS
+). However, as documented by Nearns and Androw (2013) and
+Costa-Silva et al. (2024)
+, the Henry Klages collection has been noted for containing numerous mislabelled Nearctic and Neotropical specimens, including some cases of misidentification within the
+Trogidae
+(see
+Costa-Silva et al. 2024
+for examples).
+
+Omorgus fuliginosus
+
+is known from the
+United States
+,
+Mexico
+,
+Guatemala
+,
+El Salvador
+, and
+Costa Rica
+(
+Vaurie 1955
+;
+Ratcliffe 1978
+;
+Deloya 2000
+), making its record in
+Colombia
+questionable, but not impossible.
+
+
+Therefore, we conclude that
+
+O. capillaceus
+
+should be considered a junior subjective synonym of
+
+O. fuliginosus
+
+, having been described based on a worn and mislabelled specimen from
+Bogotá
+,
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution.
+
+
+Costa Rica
+,
+El Salvador
+,
+Guatemala
+,
+Mexico
+, and
+United States
+(
+Vaurie 1955
+;
+Ratcliffe 1978
+;
+Deloya 2000
+).
+
+
+
+
+Non-type examined material
+
+
+
+(
+9 specimens
+).
+
+MEXICO
+–
+
+Veracruz
+
+
+
+•
+
+5;
+Carr. Actopan
+,
+Passando la Desv. Idolos
+;
+
+30 Aug. 1994
+
+;
+L. Arellano
+&
+R. Sanchez
+leg.;
+
+CEMT
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Carr. Alto Lucero
+,
+Km
+2
+Desviación la Concepción
+;
+
+18 Oct. 1994
+
+;
+L. Arellano
+&
+R. Sanchez
+leg.;
+
+CEMT
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Carretera Xalapa-Alto Lucera
+,
+1 km
+de Espinal
+;
+
+31 Aug. 1994
+
+;
+L. Arellano
+&
+R. Sanchez
+leg.;
+
+CEMT
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Catemaco
+,
+Parq. de la Flora
+y
+Fauna Silvestre
+tropical;
+
+29 Apr. 1990
+
+;
+F. Capistran
+leg.;
+
+CEMT
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Plan
+de
+Hidalgo
+,
+Mpio de Papantla
+;
+
+19 Mar. 1997
+
+;
+R. Sanchéz
+&
+M. E. Favila
+leg.;
+
+CEMT
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/63/73/E2/6373E2A75A8A5F2C8F3DF4F8CF4C1AB0.xml b/data/63/73/E2/6373E2A75A8A5F2C8F3DF4F8CF4C1AB0.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0d360133c15
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/63/73/E2/6373E2A75A8A5F2C8F3DF4F8CF4C1AB0.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+
+
+
+An illustrated catalogue of South American species of Omorgus Erichson, 1847 (Coleoptera, Trogidae, Omorginae) including a neotype designation and taxonomical changes
+
+
+
+Author
+
+da Costa-Silva, Vinícius
+0000-0002-4556-3793
+Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X 20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa & Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Strümpher, Werner P.
+0000-0002-7047-2666
+Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 413, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Barclay, Maxwell V. L.
+0000-0003-4989-2014
+Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z.
+0000-0001-9697-320X
+Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+81
+101
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e126799
+339AB68C-DCB1-435F-B88E-2C42D0A7B05E
+
+
+
+
+Genus
+
+Omorgus
+Erichson, 1847
+
+
+
+
+
+Note.
+
+
+For morphological description and diagnosis, see
+Vaurie (1962
+– as “ species group
+suberosus
+”),
+Scholtz (1990)
+, and
+Strümpher et al. (2016)
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+species.
+
+
+
+
+Trox suberosus
+Fabricius, 1775
+
+(by subsequent designation,
+Lacordaire, 1856
+).
+
+
+
+
+Identification key.
+
+
+The identification keys of
+Vaurie (1962)
+and
+Scholtz (1990)
+can be used to identify South American species of
+
+Omorgus
+
+, while
+Costa-Silva et al. (2021)
+can be used for Brazilian species.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/64/CD/98/64CD980A2F7357AFA784CD853C13CB04.xml b/data/64/CD/98/64CD980A2F7357AFA784CD853C13CB04.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b5f6ab566e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/64/CD/98/64CD980A2F7357AFA784CD853C13CB04.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+
+
+
+Dickyyuella argentinensis a tentative new genus and species of Cardiochilinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) from the Neotropical region
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Kang, Ilgoo
+0000-0002-8501-1758
+Department of Entomology, Kyungpook National University, Sangju, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Sharkey, Michael J.
+0000-0001-6201-7340
+The Hymenoptera Institute, Redlands, CA, USA
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+1208
+
+
+165
+172
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1208.128640
+61FBFC75-F50A-46AC-BAA2-55F72847EC9E
+
+
+
+
+
+Dickyyuella
+Kang & Sharkey
+
+gen. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 1 A – E
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+species.
+
+
+
+
+Dickyyuella argentinensis
+Kang & Sharkey
+
+,
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body relatively small compared to members of the other cardiochiline genera, with strong sculpture, especially on mesosoma. Antenna thick (Fig.
+1 A
+). Eyes bare (Fig.
+1 B
+). Occipital carina well developed dorsally, absent ventrally (Fig.
+1 E
+). Most of head with weak microsculpture. Median ocellus surrounded medially and laterally by a smooth, curved ridge. Pronotum bilobed anteriorly with a transverse plate dorsally. Notauli deeply impressed and entirely costate (Fig.
+1 E
+). Median lobe of mesoscutum bilobed. Scutellar sulcus deep with a median carina (Fig.
+1 E
+). Scutellum smooth and flat. Postscutellar depression absent (Fig.
+1 E
+). Epicnemial carina strong and complete (Fig.
+1 B
+). Precoxal sulcus well defined with ~ 5 costulae (Fig.
+1 B
+). Propodeum rugose with a large, well-defined median areola. Apical abscissa of RS entirely nebulous and almost straight, very slightly curved posteriorly (Fig.
+1 C
+). (RS + M) b about 3 × longer than m-cu vein (Fig.
+1 C
+). 1 M about 3 × longer than m-cu vein; lacking distinct claval lobe. Veins M + Cu and M about equal in length. Hind basitarsomere swollen (Fig.
+1 A
+). Tarsal claws rather large with pectinate base (Fig.
+1 D
+). Spiracle of
+T
+1 on membranous laterotergite (Fig.
+1 B
+).
+T
+1 wide with carinate lateral margins; medial area of
+T
+1 with an inverse Y-shaped depression (Fig.
+1 E
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dickyyuella argentinensis
+Kang & Sharkey
+
+,
+sp. nov.
+holotype
+A
+lateral habitus of the specimen, including antennae and wings
+B
+lateral view, zoomed in on head, mesosoma, and metasoma
+C
+wings
+D
+hind tarsal claw
+E
+dorsal habitus of the specimen, zoomed in on head, mesosoma, and metasoma.
+
+
+
+
+
+Biology.
+
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+Neotropics.
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The genus name is a patronym in honor of Dicky Sick Ki Yu, who developed Taxapad and made significant contributions to
+Braconidae
+and
+Ichneumonidae
+systematics research. Gender is feminine.
+
+
+
+
+Notes.
+
+
+The members of
+
+Dickyyuella
+Kang & Sharkey
+
+,
+gen. nov.
+will run to couplet
+1 in
+the key to the world genera by
+Dangerfield et al. (1999)
+, but it can be easily distinguished from members of
+
+Heteropteron
+
+and
+
+Neocardiochiles
+
+by the size, well-developed occipital carina, deep and broad notauli, large median areola on propodeum, and rugose propodeum.
+
+
+Species description
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/6B/05/31/6B05318011F35D7C95E621A314732FC0.xml b/data/6B/05/31/6B05318011F35D7C95E621A314732FC0.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..36a6e11565a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/6B/05/31/6B05318011F35D7C95E621A314732FC0.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,514 @@
+
+
+
+Description of six new species of Cyrtodactylus Gray (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from northeastern India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Boruah, Bitupan
+0000-0001-8829-6069
+Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Narayanan, Surya
+0000-0001-9359-2815
+SM Sehgal Foundation Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Bangalore, Karnataka 560064, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Aravind, Neelavar Ananthram
+0000-0002-4515-8421
+SM Sehgal Foundation Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Bangalore, Karnataka 560064, India & Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya University, Derlakatte, Mangalore, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Lalronunga, Samuel
+0000-0002-7542-4815
+Holy Child Society, Nalkata, Tripura 799263, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Deepak, V.
+0000-0002-8826-9367
+Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK & School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE 1 7 RU, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Das, Abhijit
+0000-0002-5851-8457
+Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
+
+text
+
+
+Vertebrate Zoology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+453
+486
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/vz.74.e124752
+154CE236-EFA8-4411-834B-234A9B45A63F
+
+
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus namdaphaensis
+Boruah, Narayanan, Deepak & Das
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figure 8
+;
+Tables 2, S 2
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+.
+
+
+
+
+Adult male (WII-ADR 1416), collected from
+Kamala Valley
+(
+
+27.4595 ° N
+;
+96.4279 ° E
+
+;
+
+elevation
+650 m
+a. s. l.
+
+),
+Namdapha Tiger Reserve
+,
+Changlang District
+,
+Arunachal Pradesh
+,
+India
+by
+Abhijit Das
+and
+Bitupan Boruah
+on
+
+18 May 2022
+
+(Fig.
+3 A
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Paratypes
+.
+
+
+
+Two adult
+males (WII-ADR 1415, WII-ADR 1417) collected from the same locality as the
+holotype
+on the same date;
+one adult
+female (WII-ADR 1404) collected near Deban (
+
+27.4942 ° N
+;
+96.3701 ° E
+
+; elevation
+400 m
+a. s. l.), Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang District,
+Arunachal Pradesh
+,
+India
+by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah on
+11 May 2022
+;
+two adult
+females (WII-ADR 3067, WII-ADR 3068) collected from Motijheel trail (
+
+27.4899 ° N
+,
+96.3348 ° E
+
+; elevation
+470 m
+a. s. l.), Gibbons’ Land, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang District,
+Arunachal Pradesh
+,
+India
+by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah on
+11 September 2022
+;
+one adult
+female (WII-ADR 1790) collected near
+Burma
+Nullah (
+40 mile
+point) (
+
+27.4878 ° N
+;
+96.5416 ° E
+
+; elevation
+480 m
+a. s. l.), Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang District,
+Arunachal Pradesh
+,
+India
+by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah on
+18 September 2022
+.
+
+
+
+
+Referred materials.
+
+
+An adult female (WII-ADR 3060) collected from Sinabrai (
+
+27.7434 ° N
+;
+96.3872 ° E
+
+; elevation
+470 m
+a. s. l.), Kamlang Tiger Reserve, Lohit District,
+Arunachal Pradesh
+,
+India
+on
+5 September 2022
+by Bitupan Boruah and Abhijit Das; an adult female (WII-ADR 3281) and an adult male (WII-ADR 3282) collected from Hornbill (
+
+27.5381 ° N
+;
+96.4403 ° E
+
+; elevation
+670 m
+a. s. l.), Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang District,
+Arunachal Pradesh
+,
+India
+on
+10 May 2023
+by Rajiv
+
+N.
+V
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Medium-sized gecko (
+SVL
+57.5–70.7 mm
+in males and
+SVL
+54.8–69.3 mm
+in females); supralabials and infralabials 8–11; dorsum with weakly keeled and bluntly conical tubercles, 29–36 paravertebral tubercles between the level of axilla and level of groin; 17–19 dorsal tubercle rows at mid body; 33–40 mid ventral scale rows; seven to nine precloacal pores in males and 8–10 small precloacal pores in females in a continuous series,
+PcP
+much smaller in females than that of males; 12–14 subdigital lamellae on finger IV and 11–17 subdigital lamellae on toe IV; irregular dark-brown spots or stripes on dorsum.
+
+
+
+
+
+Description of
+holotype
+.
+
+
+
+Holotype
+well preserved except a ventrolateral incision below left axilla. Snout-vent length
+65.3 mm
+. Head moderately large (
+HL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.27), dorsoventrally depressed, ovoid in shape, longer than width (
+HW
+/
+HL
+= 0.66), distinct from neck, broader at occipital region; snout rounded in both dorsal and lateral view; loreal region convex; canthus rostralis rounded, indistinct; interorbital space flat, a longitudinal furrow on dorsal surface of the snout, snout short (
+SO
+/
+HL
+= 0.4), longer than orbit (
+OD
+/
+SO
+= 0.71); nostril semicircular, opening directed posterolaterally; ear opening oval and oblique; scales on head heterogeneous, largest on snout and loreal region, posteriorly smaller, interorbital space and occipital region, granular juxtaposed; scales on upper eyelids nearly homogeneous, granular juxtaposed; supraciliaries outwardly sharp giving serrated appearance in dorsal view, size anteriorly and posteriorly decreases, largest at the anterodorsal region; rostral wide, a short groove at the middle on top, rostral connected with nasals, supranasals, internasals and first supralabials; granular scales at parietal, occipital and temporal region intermixed with slightly large, rounded and bluntly conical tubercles, dense in occipital and temporal region and size increases towards nape; supralabial 11 on right and 10 on left side, supralabials up to midorbit eight on right and seven on left side, size decreases towards angle of jaw; a series of scales slightly larger than the loreal scales present above the supralabials, posteriorly size decreased; mental as wide as rostral, nearly triangular, connected with first infralabials, inner postmentals; nine infralabials on right and eight on left side, size decreases towards angle of jaw; inner pair of postmentals are larger than the outer postmentals; two rows of enlarged scales along the infralabials starting below the outer postmentals, posteriorly size of those decreases; rest of the gular scales are small, granular juxtaposed, homogeneous, size increases towards throat where they becomes imbricate.
+
+
+Habitus slender (
+BW
+/
+SVL
+= 0.17,
+TRL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.47), dorsoventrally depressed; dorsal scales granular, rounded, heterogeneous, intermixed with rounded, irregularly arranged weakly keeled and bluntly conical tubercles, these tubercles continues to fourth segment of the tail, size increases towards posterior body and pronounced; 18 dorsal tubercles across mid dorsum; 36 paravertebral tubercles; ventrolateral fold weak; ventral scales larger than those of dorsal, flat, smooth, cycloid subimbricate to imbricate, largest towards belly; 40 mid-ventral scales between ventrolateral fold; seven precloacal pores arranged in an inverted “
+V
+” shaped continuous series, followed by five unpored, large scales below it, one enlarged unpored scale present on right end of the
+PcP
+series.
+
+
+Forelimbs and hindlimbs slender (
+FL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.15,
+CL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.18); digits strongly inflected at the joints, all bearing large recurved claw, enlarged subdigital lamellae; lamellae beneath digit IV of right and left manus (given as basal + distal) is 5 + 8; lamellae beneath digit IV of right and left pes (given as basal + distal) is 6 + 8 and 5 + 8 respectively; dorsal scales on forelimbs smooth, subimbricate and heterogeneous, small and granular at elbow, scales on forearm nearly rounded while those on hind arm are posteriorly tapering; forearm scales intermixed with enlarged rounded and bluntly conical tubercles; dorsal scales of hindlimbs heterogeneous, intermixed with large, rounded and bluntly conical tubercles, dense than those on forelimbs; horizontally upper half of the thigh scales are smooth, large and subimbricate, those on lower half small granular; scales on tibia are small, granular juxtaposed; ventral scales of forelimbs granular, juxtaposed, mostly homogeneous; scales on palm heterogeneous in shape and size, granular juxtaposed; scales on ventral side of hindlimbs smaller than those of belly, smooth, cycloid and subimbricate, but on the knee, above cloaca and on thigh below the level of precloacal pores are smaller and granular; scales on soles heterogeneous, granular, juxtaposed to subimbricate.
+
+
+Tail regenerated (
+TL
+=
+79 mm
+), slender, gradually tapering towards tip, segments indistinct, in the original part of the tail dorsal scales small, granular, juxtaposed at the base, posteriorly size increases, flat, smooth, subimbricate, heterogeneous in shape and size; in the regenerated part of the tail, scales are irregular in shape and size; large feebly keeled scales upto fourth segment of the tail, those on basal segment are pronounced; subcaudal scales smooth, subimbricate, wider than that of dorsal, heterogeneous in shape and size; no enlarged plate like series of subcaudal scales; two and four bluntly conical spurs on right and left side of the tail base respectively.
+
+
+
+
+Colouration in preservative.
+
+Top of head pale-brown, upper eyelids grey; neck and dorsum dorsally greyish-brown; two brown stripes with irregular edge on dorsal side of the neck continuing to the level of forelimb insertion, and another stripe on each lateral side of the neck; seven pairs of slightly dark-brown elongated spots of irregular shape and size on dorsum, these spots are outwardly connected to a narrow, brown dorsolateral stripe; tail dorsally pale-brown with broad dark-brown cross bars of irregular shape and size on the original part, the first bar broken into two elongated spots, regenerated part of the tail is plain pale-brown; ventrally head, trunk and tail pale-cream coloured, a few irregular brown spots on tail.
+
+
+
+Colouration in life.
+
+
+(Based on
+paratype
+WII-ADR 1417) (Fig.
+8 I
+); head dorsally brown with irregular dark-brown patches, a pair of pale-yellowish spots on loreal in front of anterodorsal corner of eyes, lips slightly paler than dorsal head colour with irregular pale-yellowish spots; a pale-brown postorbital streak; pale-brown irregular spots on dark-brown background on neck; upper eyelids greyish-brown; slightly dark-brown large spots of irregular size and shape on dorsal and lateral side of the trunk, interspaced with pale-brown patches, dark-brown spots on dorsal side of the trunk giving appearance of continuous stripes up to middle of the trunk; anterior two third of dorsal side of the tail with alternative broad dark-brown and narrow pale-brown bands, those dark-brown bands anteriorly diffused and posterior edge zigzagged, posterior one third brown with dark-brown marbling; limbs brown with irregular pale spots and dark-brown reticulation; digits with alternative dark-brown and pale-brown bands.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus namdaphaensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+A
+
+–
+G
+holotype (WII-ADR 1416),
+A
+dorsal, and
+B
+ventral view of the whole body;
+C
+dorsal,
+D
+ventral, and
+E
+lateral view of head;
+F
+ventral view of left manus and
+G
+left pes;
+H
+precloacal pores of paratype WII-ADR 1417;
+I
+paratype WII-ADR 1417, and
+J
+paratype WII-ADR 1415 in life. Scale bar: 10 mm.
+I, J
+not to scale.
+
+
+
+
+
+Morphological variation.
+
+Morphological variations are given in Table S 2. Except for those, the dorsal marking pattern varied among the collected specimens. The dorsal spots of WII-ADR 1417 are in the form of two continuous stripes starting from neck, posteriorly broken; a spot at the middle of occipital region followed by a dark cross bar on the nape; WII-ADR 3067 and WII-ADR 3281 has four dorsal stripes starting from neck to the level of hind limb insertion; WII-ADR 3068 has four stripes on neck, followed by five irregular and zigzag cross bars on dorsum; in WII-ADR 1790, dorsal spots are indistinct and irregular; WII-ADR 1415 has three pairs of dark spots posteriorly bordered with white spots on neck, cross bars on dorsum narrower, irregular and posteriorly with white (Fig. S 2); WII-ADR 3060 has six dark brown cross bands on back between the level of axilla and groin, consists of irregular shaped enlarged individual spots, mid dorsally these spots are remarkably disjunct,. Precloacal pores in females are smaller than that of males.
+
+
+
+Comparison.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus namdaphaensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+differs from
+
+C. mombergi
+
+by fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+17–19 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+23–27), by fewer precloacal pores,
+PcP
+7–9 (vs.
+PcP
+10–11). Morphological differences with other members of
+
+khasiensis
+
+group is presented in Table
+2
+.
+
+
+
+
+Sequence divergence.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus namdaphaensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+has a moderate genetic divergence of 6.2–7.9 % from the closely related
+
+C. mombergi
+
+. The intraspecific divergence among the thirteen samples of
+
+C. namdaphaensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+ranges between 0.1–5 %.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The specific epithet is a toponym named after its
+type
+locality Namdapha Tiger Reserve in
+Arunachal Pradesh
+,
+India
+.
+
+
+
+
+Suggested common name.
+
+Namdapha bent-toed gecko.
+
+
+
+Distribution and natural history.
+
+
+So far,
+
+Cyrtodactylus namdaphaensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+has been recorded within an elevational range of
+400–650 m
+a. s. l. inside Namdapha Tiger Reserve. All the localities are south of Noa-Dihing River in Changlang District,
+Arunachal Pradesh
+,
+India
+. We recorded this species between
+May and September 2022
+. Individuals were recorded on tree bark, ferns, and riparian vegetation and along forest trails between 18: 00–23: 00 hrs. The forest
+type
+can be classified as
+Assam
+Valley Tropical Evergreen Forest. The area had a distinct understory with a thick covering of leaf-litter. Currently the species has been recorded from 25 Mile,
+Burma
+Nullah (40 Mile), Gibbons Land, Motijheel trail and at Hornbill camp located at the north bank of Noa-Dihing River within the Namdapha Tiger Reserve. We also recorded this species on rocks and vegetation near Kamlang River at Sinabrai, near the Kamlang Tiger Reserve, at an elevation of
+470 m
+a. s. l. We observed juveniles of this species on the forest floor in the leaf litter during May, 2022. During 2023, adult individuals were seen on the ferns overhanging first order streams. At the slightest disturbance, the lizards would drop into the thick vegetation below. Other arboreal reptile taxa from the area included
+
+Ptyctolaemus
+sp.
+
+,
+
+Japalura
+sp.
+
+and
+
+Pareas
+sp.
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/6B/18/65/6B18655057BE5BF7B105FA47E165B89A.xml b/data/6B/18/65/6B18655057BE5BF7B105FA47E165B89A.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ad7a2368592
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/6B/18/65/6B18655057BE5BF7B105FA47E165B89A.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,296 @@
+
+
+
+Four new Dolichopoda species from Greece, one Troglophilus new to Greece and new locality records (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alexiou, Sotiris
+0000-0003-1031-3003
+Korinthian Museum of Natural History, Isthmion 201, Korinthos 20100, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bakolitsas, Kostas
+0000-0003-3137-4024
+Laboratory of Natural Sciences 3 rd General Lyceum, 301 31 Agrinion, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Di Russo, Claudio
+0000-0002-1620-9592
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rampini, Mauro
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+103
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e121614
+5AA51752-2447-410B-A249-7B421D573CE4
+
+
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda kotsabasi
+Alexiou
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1
+,
+7
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+:
+GREECE
+•
+♂
+; Νomos
+Samou
+,
+Ikaria Isl.
+, near
+Akamatra
+,
+cave Alama
+;
+
+37 ° 36.124 ' N
+,
+26 ° 10.816 ' E
+
+;
+
+
+370 m
+
+.
+
+asl. ;
+
+24 Sep. 2022
+
+;
+S. Alexiou
+&
+K. Kotsabas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+Paratypes
+
+:
+GREECE
+•
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+, same data as for holotype
+
+.
+Other material
+:
+
+GREECE
+•
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+; Νomos
+Samou
+,
+Ikaria Isl.
+,
+Petropouli
+,
+cave Raos Choutra
+;
+
+24 Sep. 2022
+
+;
+S. Alexiou
+&
+K. Kotsabas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+The new species shows a strong resemblance to the already known species of the central
+Aegean
+area. It is mostly similar to the two cave crickets endemic on the nearby island of Samos,
+
+D. giulianae
+Rampini & Di Russo, 2012
+
+and
+
+D. kalithea
+Di Russo &
+Rampini, 2012
+
+, as well as to the Anatolian
+
+D. sutini
+Rampini & Taylan, 2012
+
+, the females especially being very similar (
+Rampini et al. 2012
+). The males of both species of Samos have a more robust and arched median process of the epiphallus than
+
+D. kotsabasi
+
+sp. nov.
+Furthermore, the males of
+
+D. kalithea
+
+have trapezoidal, not globular, lobes at the subgenital plate and
+
+D. giulianae
+
+have squared lobes at the X tergum.
+
+Dolichopoda sutini
+
+also presents a differently shaped median process of the epiphallus as well as differently shaped lateral lobes of the subgenital plate of the males. The new species shows very similar median process of the epiphallus with
+
+D. calidnae
+
+, endemic to Kalymnos Island,
+
+D. paraskevi
+
+, endemic to
+Crete
+, as well as to
+
+D. naxia
+
+, endemic to Naxos Island, being elongated, more slender and less arched. However, it shows significant differences in most other characters for both sexes.
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+Body pale testaceous, posterior margin of the terga darker. Hind femora unarmed, hind tibiae with 24 / 25 spines on both sides.
+Fore tibiae with 4 spines on both sides of ventral side, mid tibiae with 5 spines on both sides of ventral side and hind tibiae with 19 spines on both sides of dorsal side.
+
+X tergum (last abdominal tergite) (Fig.
+7 A
+) slightly incised in the middle, with two lateral triangular lobes, lobes with rounded apex.
+
+
+
+Subgenital plate (Fig.
+7 B
+) globular, divided by a median triangular incision, with short lateral lobes ; styli short, inserted almost at the apex of the plate, where an incision occurs.
+
+
+Epiphallus sclerotized, with an acute cylindrical median process. Median process slightly curved inwards, laterally robust at the base (Fig.
+7 C, D
+).
+
+Measurements (length in mm): body 17, pronotum 4, fore femora 15, middle femora 16, hind femora 26.
+
+Female.
+As in male. Subgenital plate rounded, slightly incised in the middle (7 E). Ovipositor
+9 mm
+, robust at the base, slightly arched upwards, lower valves with 15 denticles (7 F).
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+The new species is named after botanist Konstantinos Kotsabas, a researcher of the flora of Ikaria who was the first to observe the cave crickets on the island.
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+Known only from two caves on Ikaria Island. A third population of presumably the same species was observed by Konstantinos Kotsabas at Chalavra Katafigi, inside a narrow cave opening underneath the chapel of Agios Nikolaos.
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/73/9E/A5/739EA53FD4D75FBFB2DB62ECAC41A8D3.xml b/data/73/9E/A5/739EA53FD4D75FBFB2DB62ECAC41A8D3.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4007dc4049d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/73/9E/A5/739EA53FD4D75FBFB2DB62ECAC41A8D3.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,572 @@
+
+
+
+Description of six new species of Cyrtodactylus Gray (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from northeastern India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Boruah, Bitupan
+0000-0001-8829-6069
+Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Narayanan, Surya
+0000-0001-9359-2815
+SM Sehgal Foundation Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Bangalore, Karnataka 560064, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Aravind, Neelavar Ananthram
+0000-0002-4515-8421
+SM Sehgal Foundation Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Bangalore, Karnataka 560064, India & Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya University, Derlakatte, Mangalore, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Lalronunga, Samuel
+0000-0002-7542-4815
+Holy Child Society, Nalkata, Tripura 799263, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Deepak, V.
+0000-0002-8826-9367
+Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK & School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE 1 7 RU, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Das, Abhijit
+0000-0002-5851-8457
+Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
+
+text
+
+
+Vertebrate Zoology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+453
+486
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/vz.74.e124752
+154CE236-EFA8-4411-834B-234A9B45A63F
+
+
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus manipurensis
+Boruah, Narayanan, Deepak & Das
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figure 6
+;
+Tables 2, S 2
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+.
+
+
+
+
+Adult male (WII-ADR 1596), collected near
+Lamdan Kabui village
+(
+
+24.5954 ° N
+;
+93.7085 ° E
+
+;
+
+elevation
+1240 m
+a. s. l.
+
+) (Fig.
+3 A
+),
+Churachandpur District
+,
+Manipur
+,
+India
+collected by
+Bitupan Boruah
+on
+
+25 July 2022
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype (WII-ADR 1596) of
+
+Cyrtodactylus manipurensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+in preserved condition.
+A
+dorsal and
+B
+ventral view of the whole body;
+C
+ventral,
+D
+dorsal, and
+E
+lateral view of head;
+F
+dorsal enlarged tubercles on trunk;
+G
+ventral view of right manus and
+H
+of right pes. Scale bar: 10 mm.
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Medium-sized gecko,
+SVL
+at least
+59.5 mm
+in adult male; 10 supralabials; eight or nine infralabials; 21 bluntly conical and feebly keeled tubercles across midbody; 37 paravertebral tubercles; 36 mid-ventral scales between ventrolateral folds; 11 or 12 subdigital lamellae beneath digit IV of manus; 13–16 subdigital lamellae beneath digit IV of pes; seven precloacal pores arranged in a continuous series; six irregular shaped dark-brown cross bands on back between axilla and groin; tail dorsally with eight dark-brown and seven pale-brown bands arranged alternatively.
+
+
+
+
+
+Description of the
+holotype
+.
+
+
+
+Specimen well preserved except an incision below left axilla ventrolaterally. Snout-vent length
+59.5 mm
+. Head moderately large (
+HL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.26), oval, dorsoventrally depressed, longer than width (
+HW
+/
+HL
+= 0.71), distinct from neck, broader at occipital region; snout tip rounded in both dorsal and lateral view; loreal region convex; canthus rostralis rounded, indistinct; interorbital space flat; a longitudinal furrow on dorsal surface of the snout; snout short (
+SO
+/
+HL
+= 0.39), longer than orbit (
+OD
+/
+SO
+= 0.68); nostril nearly rounded, opening directed posterolaterally; ear opening rounded; scales on head heterogeneous, largest on snout and loreal region, posteriorly smaller in upper eyelid, interorbital space and occipital region, granular juxtaposed; scales on upper eyelids heterogeneous; supraciliaries outwardly sharp giving serrated appearance in dorsal view, size anteriorly and posteriorly decreases, largest at the anterodorsal region; rostral wide, a short groove at the middle on top, rostral connected with nasals, supranasals, an internasal and first supralabials, two scales between the supranasals paced longitudinally, granular scales at parietal, occipital and temporal region intermixed with slightly large rounded granular tubercles starting from the level of posterior margin of the upper eyelids, those on temporal region are slightly larger than that of occipital region, size of the tubercles increases towards nape; 10 supralabial scales on both sides, size decreases towards angle of jaw; 8 supralabials up to midorbit on both sides; mental nearly triangular, connected with first infralabials, inner postmentals; nine infralabials on right side and eight on left side, size decreases towards angle of jaw; first infralabials connected with mental, second infralabial, inner and outer postmentals; inner pair of postmentals are larger than the outer postmentals; two rows of slightly enlarged scales along the infralabials starting below the outer postmentals, posteriorly size of those decreases; rest of the gular scales are small, granular juxtaposed, nearly homogeneous, size increases towards the throat where they become imbricate.
+
+
+Habitus slender (
+BW
+/
+SVL
+= 0.16,
+TRL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.49), dorsoventrally depressed, dorsal scales granular, rounded, heterogeneous, intermixed with rounded, weakly keeled and bluntly conical tubercles irregularly arranged, up to third segment of the tail, size increases towards posterior body and pronounced at the base of tail; 21 dorsal tubercles across mid dorsum; 37 paravertebral tubercles; ventrolateral fold weak; ventral scales larger than those of dorsal, flat, smooth, cycloid subimbricate to imbricate; 36 mid-ventral scales between ventrolateral fold; seven precloacal pores arranged in an inverted “
+V
+” shaped continuous series, followed by a series of five unpored enlarged scales below it, largest at the apex, an unpored scale equal size to
+PcP
+present in continuous with the
+PcP
+in both ends; scales above the
+PcP
+larger than those of belly scales.
+
+
+Forelimbs and hindlimbs slender (
+FL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.14,
+CL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.17), digits strongly inflected at the joints, all bearing large recurved claw, enlarged subdigital lamellae; lamellae beneath digit IV of right and left manus (given as basal + distal) is 6 + 5 and 6 + 6 respectively; lamellae beneath digit IV of both right and left pes (given as basal + distal) is 6 + 7 and 7 + 9 respectively; dorsal scales on forelimbs heterogeneous is size, mostly granular; proximal scales on upper arm are smaller than that of lower arm; scales near elbow on lower arm smooth and subimbricate; upper arm scales granular at proximal part and at the distal end it is smooth, cycloid and imbricate; dorsal scales of hindlimbs heterogeneous, intermixed with slightly enlarged, feebly keeled and bluntly conical tubercles; scales on inner lateral side of the thighs are smooth, large and subimbricate, those on dorsal side are small granular; scales on tibia are small, granular juxtaposed; ventral scales of forelimbs granular, juxtaposed, heterogeneous; scales on palm heterogeneous in shape and size, granular juxtaposed; ventral scales on hindlimbs heterogeneous; most of the thigh scales are smooth, cycloid and subimbricate, but on the knee and below the level of precloacal pores, scales are smaller and granular; scales above the vent granular; tibia scales smooth, nearly homogeneous, cycloid and subimbricate; scales on soles heterogeneous, granular, juxtaposed to subimbricate.
+
+
+Tail complete (
+TL
+=
+67 mm
+), slender, gradually tapering towards tip, segments indistinct, dorsal scales small, granular, juxtaposed at the base, posteriorly size increases, flat, smooth, subimbricate, heterogeneous in shape and size, large feebly keeled scales up to third segment of the tail, those on basal segment are pronounced; subcaudal scales smooth, subimbricate, wider than that of dorsal, heterogeneous in shape and size; no enlarged plate like series of subcaudal scales; three bluntly conical spurs on both sides of the tail base.
+
+
+
+
+Colouration in preservative.
+
+Head on top and laterally brown; upper eyelids grey; dorsal ground colour of neck and back slightly paler than that of head; dark-brown irregular patches on neck up to fore limb insertion level; six irregular shaped dark-brown cross bands on back between axilla and groin, mid-dorsally interrupted; one dark-brown band on sacrum; tail dorsally with eight dark-brown and seven pale-brown bands arranged alternatively; dark bands are comparatively broader than the pale bands; the first dark-brown band on tail base broken mid-dorsally into two enlarged elongated spots. Ventrally head, neck, trunk and limbs light-brown; tail with irregular dark-brown specks.
+
+
+
+Comparison.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus manipurensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+differs from
+
+C. aaronbaueri
+
+by fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+21 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+22–28); differs from
+
+C. aunglini
+
+by fewer mid-ventral scale rows,
+
+MVSR
+
+36 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+47–49), by fewer precloacal pores,
+PcP
+7 (vs.
+PcP
+12 or 13); differs from
+
+C. barailensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+by number of dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+21 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+17), number of paravertebral tubercle rows,
+PVT
+37 (vs.
+
+PVT
+
+32); differs from
+
+C. bengkhuaiai
+
+by fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+21 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+22–26); differs from
+
+C. brevidactylus
+
+by having fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+21 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+27–30), enlarged chocolate-brown patches on head and back absent (vs. present); differs from
+
+C. chrysopylos
+
+by much smaller body size,
+SVL
+59.5 mm
+(vs.
+
+SVL
+
+64.9–79.1 mm
+in male), fewer precloacal pores,
+PcP
+7 (vs
+PcP
+8–13); differs from
+
+C. dianxiensis
+
+by smaller body size,
+SVL
+59.5 mm
+(vs.
+
+SVL
+
+73.8–79.9 mm
+), 21 rows of dorsal tubercle rows (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+18 or 19); differs from
+
+C. gansi
+
+by fewer precloacal pores,
+PcP
+7 (vs.
+PcP
+16–29), ventrolateral fold present on trunk (vs. absent); differs from
+
+C. jaintiaensis
+
+by much smaller body size,
+SVL
+59.5 mm
+(vs.
+
+SVL
+
+87.0–
+88.3 mm
+in male), fewer precloacal pores in male,
+PcP
+7 (vs.
+PcP
+11 or 12); differs from
+
+C. kiphire
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+by smaller body size,
+SVL
+59.5 mm
+(
+SVL
+63.9–64.7 mm
+), number of dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+21 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+16), number of paravertebral tubercle rows,
+PVT
+37 (vs.
+
+PVT
+
+26 or 29); differs from
+
+C. lungleiensis
+
+by higher number of precloacal pores,
+PcP
+7 (vs.
+PcP
+3–5 in
+male), fewer dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+21 (vs. 24–28); differs from
+
+C. montanus
+
+by larger body size,
+SVL
+59.5 mm
+(vs. 53.6–55.0 mm in male); differs from
+
+C. myaleiktaung
+
+by fewer mid-ventral scale rows,
+
+MVSR
+
+36 (vs.
+
+MVSR
+
+57), precloacal pores present (vs.
+PcP
+absent), broad regular dark bands absent on dorsum (vs. present); differs from
+
+C. nagalandensis
+
+by higher number of dorsal tubercle rows,
+DTR
+21 (vs.
+
+DTR
+
+16–18); differs from
+
+C. namtiram
+
+by having fewer precloacal pores,
+PcP
+7 (vs.
+PcP
+12); differs from
+
+C. ngopensis
+
+by the number of precloacal pores,
+PcP
+7 (vs.
+PcP
+6); differs from
+
+C. siahaensis
+
+by be fewer subdigital lamellae, 11 or 12 lamellae under fourth finger (vs. 13 or 14 lamellae under fourth finger), dark-brown broad bands consists of two series of enlarged spots on dorsum (vs. dark-brown blotches in the form of reticulation on dorsum); differs from
+
+C. vairengtensis
+
+by fewer precloacal pores,
+PcP
+7 (vs.
+PcP
+9–11). Morphological differences with other members of
+
+khasiensis
+
+group is presented in Table
+2
+.
+
+
+
+
+Sequence divergence.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus manipurensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+has a high genetic divergence of 11.2–11.3 % from its closely related
+
+C. ngopensis
+
+, 10–10.3 % from
+
+C. aaronbaueri
+
+, 10.2–10.5 % from
+
+C. vairengtensis
+
+and 9.7–11.1 % from the
+
+C. montanus
+
+. With other members of the clade,
+
+C. kiphire
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+has a genetic divergence of 8.6 % and 23 % in the ND 2 gene.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+This species is named after
+Manipur state
+in
+India
+.
+
+
+
+
+Suggested common name.
+
+
+Manipur
+bent-toed gecko.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution and natural history.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus manipurensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+is currently only recorded from the
+type
+locality. We collected a single individual at 18: 00 hrs on
+25 July 2022
+near Lamdan Kabui village. It was perched on a shrub at a height of approximately
+1.5 m
+, on the road connecting Leimatak and Charoikhullen. The habitat is secondary forest, with
+
+Zingiber
+sp.
+
+cultivation and settlements.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7E/86/44/7E86444E7AE65F60B172EB037C1E731E.xml b/data/7E/86/44/7E86444E7AE65F60B172EB037C1E731E.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..625cac1c4e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7E/86/44/7E86444E7AE65F60B172EB037C1E731E.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,2700 @@
+
+
+
+An illustrated catalogue of South American species of Omorgus Erichson, 1847 (Coleoptera, Trogidae, Omorginae) including a neotype designation and taxonomical changes
+
+
+
+Author
+
+da Costa-Silva, Vinícius
+0000-0002-4556-3793
+Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X 20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa & Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Strümpher, Werner P.
+0000-0002-7047-2666
+Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 413, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Barclay, Maxwell V. L.
+0000-0003-4989-2014
+Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z.
+0000-0001-9697-320X
+Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+81
+101
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e126799
+339AB68C-DCB1-435F-B88E-2C42D0A7B05E
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+pastillarius
+(
+Blanchard, 1847
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Trox pastillarius
+
+Blanchard, 1847: 187
+(original description);
+
+Harold 1869: 1089
+
+(catalogue); Harold 1972: 50 (redescription);
+
+Bruch 1911: 193
+
+(checklist);
+
+Blackwelder 1944: 218
+
+(catalogue – as “
+pastillaria
+”);
+
+Vaurie 1962: 149
+
+(redescription).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Trox
+(
+Chesas
+)
+pastillarius
+
+
+:
+
+Burmeister 1876: 250
+
+, 264 (key and diagnosis);
+
+Preudhomme de Borre 1886: 59
+
+(key and comments);
+
+Arrow 1912: 59
+
+(catalogue).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Trox
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+pastillarius
+
+
+:
+
+Scholtz 1982: 12
+
+(catalogue).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus pastillarius
+
+
+:
+
+Diéguez and Gómez 2004: 94
+
+(checklist);
+
+Deloya 2005: 122
+
+(checklist);
+
+Gómez 2008: 515
+
+(key for Argentinean species).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+pastillarius
+
+
+:
+
+Scholtz 1990: 1404
+
+(redescription).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type specimen examined.
+
+
+
+
+Lectotype
+
+(
+
+
+MNHN
+
+
+). See
+Smith (2017: 87)
+for high-quality images of the type specimen.
+Type locality
+: “ en Patagonie, […], en dehors de la baie
+de San-Blas
+[
+Buenos Aires
+,
+Argentina
+]].
+
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution.
+
+
+Argentina
+,
+Bolivia
+, and
+Chile
+(
+Vaurie 1962
+;
+Scholtz 1990
+;
+Smith 2017
+). Here we present the new country record for
+Paraguay
+(National Park Cerro Corá).
+
+
+
+
+Non-type examined material
+
+
+
+(
+352 specimens
+).
+
+ARGENTINA
+–
+
+Buenos Aires
+
+
+
+•
+
+3;
+Bahía Blanca
+;
+
+6 Set. – 3 Oct. 1832
+
+;
+C. Darwin
+leg.;
+
+NHMUK
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Estancia Barran
+,
+
+30 km
+SO Viila Lais
+
+;
+
+Nov. 1946
+
+;
+
+CMNC
+
+
+•
+
+
+16–30 Set. 1968
+
+;
+Willink
+,
+Terán
+y
+Stange
+leg.;
+
+IFML
+
+
+. –
+
+
+Catamarca
+
+• 1;
+
+10 km
+S Andalgalá
+
+;
+
+May 2004
+
+;
+Pio Brizuela
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+6 km
+Santa María
+;
+
+6 Dec. 1968
+
+;
+A
+.
+Willink
+y
+Stange
+leg.;
+
+IFML
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Belen
+,
+La Cienega
+; 1926;
+Weister Wolters
+leg.;
+
+MACN
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Belén
+,
+Loma Negra
+;
+
+Jan. 1927
+
+;
+
+IFML
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Belén
+;
+
+IFML
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Catamarca
+;
+
+Nov. 1983
+
+;
+L. Peña
+leg.;
+
+CMNC
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Los Nacimientos
+;
+
+27 ° 12 ' S
+,
+66 ° 40 ' W
+
+;
+
+15 Oct. 1997
+
+;
+S. Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Punta de Balasto
+;
+
+18 Jan. 1997
+
+;
+G. Arriágada
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Recreo
+;
+
+Dec. 1920
+
+;
+
+IFML
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Santa María
+;
+
+10–17 Dec. 1995
+
+;
+G. Arriágada
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa María
+;
+
+27 Fev. 1992
+
+;
+
+NHMUK
+
+
+• 1;
+C. Bruch
+leg.;
+
+MACN
+
+•
+
+1;
+
+11 Dec. 1896
+
+;
+C. Bruch
+leg.;
+
+MACN
+
+
+• 1;
+
+MACN
+
+• 1; MLPA. –
+
+
+Chubut
+
+•
+Valdés
+,
+San Pablo Médano
+; 4
+
+2 ° 41 ' 43 " S
+,
+64 ° 10 ' 44 " W
+
+;
+
+23 Aug. 2008
+
+;
+G. Cheli
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+• 2;
+
+MACN
+
+•
+
+1;
+
+May 1905
+
+;
+C. Bruch
+leg.;
+
+MACN
+
+. –
+
+Córdoba
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+
+24 Oct. 1987
+
+;
+Gonir
+leg.;
+
+MACN
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Argüello
+,
+
+Dec. 1956
+
+–
+
+Jan. 1957
+
+;
+A
+.
+Espinal
+leg.;
+
+IFML
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Calamuchita
+,
+Belgrano
+;
+
+Oct. 1971
+
+;
+
+CMNC
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Pocho Chancaní
+;
+
+19 Set. – 23 Oct. 1993
+
+;
+L. Acosta
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Rio Cuarto
+,
+Las Albahacas
+;
+
+17 Nov. 2001
+
+;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+• 1;
+
+MACN
+
+• 3;
+
+MNHN
+
+. –
+
+
+La Pampa
+
+• 4;
+Chical Có
+,
+Reserva Provincial La Humada
+,
+Puesto Los Toldos
+;
+
+29 Set. – 24 Oct. 2002
+
+;
+N. Gouts
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Curacó
+,
+Puelches
+,
+Estancia La Gracielita
+;
+
+18 Set. 2002
+
+;
+Martínez
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Curacó
+,
+Puelches
+,
+Estancia La Gracielita
+,
+
+18 Set. 2002
+
+;
+Bárbara Corró Molas
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+14;
+Curacó
+,
+Puelches
+,
+Estancia La Gracielita
+;
+
+21 Dec. 2001
+
+;
+Bárbara Corró Molas
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Curacó
+,
+Puelches
+,
+Estancia La Gracielita
+;
+
+26 Nov. 2001
+
+;
+Bárbara Corró Molas
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Curacó
+,
+Puelches
+,
+Estancia La Gracielita
+;
+
+6 Apr. 2000
+
+;
+Bárbara Corró Molas
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+La
+Humada, Puesto Los Toldos;
+
+3 Oct. 2002
+
+;
+Maceda
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+5;
+Lihué Calel
+,
+Lihué Calel Parque Nacional
+;
+
+17 Aug. 1996
+
+;
+Pessino
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Lihué Calel
+,
+Lihué Calel Parque Nacional
+;
+
+21 Dec. 1992
+
+;
+Bárbara Corró Molas
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+3;
+Lihué Calel
+,
+Lihué Calel Parque Nacional
+;
+
+23 Mar. 1994
+
+;
+Pessino
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+Reserva Provincial Pichi Mahuida
+,
+Salto Anderson
+;
+
+22 Nov. 2003
+
+;
+Maceda
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+. –
+
+La
+Rioja
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Chamical
+, “ las viscacheras ”;
+
+Fev. 1989
+
+;
+Zunino
+,
+Barbero
+&
+Luzzatto
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Mascasin
+;
+
+Jan. 1960
+
+;
+M. Viana
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Parque Talampaya
+;
+
+10 Jan. 1997
+
+;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Patquia
+;
+
+Mar. 1948
+
+;
+Bremer
+leg.;
+
+CMNC
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Patquia
+;
+K. J. Hayward
+leg.;
+
+NHMUK
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Talampaya
+;
+
+15–16 Jan. 1997
+
+;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+. –
+
+
+Mendoza
+
+• 2;
+17 km
+E refugio
+Alvarado
+;
+
+36 ° 15 ' 22 " S
+,
+69 ° 12 ' 4 " W
+
+;
+
+19 Nov. 2012
+
+;
+G. Arriágada
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+El
+Carrizal;
+
+Set. 1974
+
+;
+S. Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+General Alvear
+, RP 188;
+
+3 Jan. 2019
+
+;
+S. Roig
+&
+R. Carrara
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+La
+Cruceta;
+
+Jan. 1983
+
+;
+A
+.
+Crimi
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+6;
+La Paz
+,
+
+14 km
+S Maquinista Levet
+
+;
+
+2–14 Jan. 2019
+
+;
+S. Roig
+&
+R. Carrara
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+La Paz
+,
+
+51 km
+S de La Paz
+
+;
+
+14 Jan. 2015
+
+;
+S. Roig
+,
+R. Carrara
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+La
+Tosca;
+
+17 Jun. 1976
+
+;
+A
+.
+Roig
+leg;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+3;
+Las Catitas
+;
+
+10 Dec. 1951
+
+;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+3;
+Lavalle
+,
+Reserva Telteca
+;
+
+32 ° 22 ' 59 " S
+,
+68 ° 3 ' 14 " W
+
+;
+
+12 Apr. 2008
+
+;
+L. Muñoz
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Lavalle
+,
+Telteca
+;
+
+10 Oct. – 3 Dec. 1996
+
+;
+R. Gonzáles
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Lavalle
+,
+Telteca
+;
+
+12 May – 17 Jun. 1995
+
+;
+Flores
+&
+Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Lavalle
+,
+Telteca
+;
+
+1–24 Nov. 1995
+
+;
+G. Flores
+,
+S. Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Lavalle
+,
+Telteca
+;
+
+13 Dec. 1994
+
+–
+
+3 Fev. 1995
+
+;
+G. Flores
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Lavalle
+,
+Telteca
+;
+
+25 Set. – 31 Oct. 1995
+
+;
+Flores
+&
+Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Lavalle
+,
+Telteca
+;
+
+26 Mar. – 2 May 1996
+
+;
+Flores
+&
+Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Lavalle
+,
+Telteca
+;
+
+3 Fev. – 14 Mar. 1995
+
+;
+G. Flores
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Lavalle
+,
+Telteca
+;
+
+3 Dec. 1996
+
+–
+
+6 Jan. 1997
+
+;
+Flores
+&
+Roig
+leg;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Lavalle
+,
+Telteca
+,
+
+6 Nov. – 3 Dec. 1996
+
+;
+Flores
+&
+Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Malargüe
+,
+5 km
+E [East] Mina Ethel, Puesto Poso de Agua;
+
+6 Jan. 2016
+
+;
+R. Carrara
+&
+G. Flores
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Malargüe
+,
+5 km
+E Mina Ethel, Puesto Poso da Agua;
+
+6 Jan. 2016
+
+;
+R. Carrara
+&
+G. Flores
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+3;
+Malargüe
+,
+Agua Escondida
+;
+
+Dec. 1975
+
+;
+S. Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Malargüe
+,
+La Senillosa
+,
+Payunia
+;
+
+20 Jan. 1998
+
+;
+A
+.
+Atencio
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+4;
+Malargüe
+,
+Ñacuñan
+;
+
+Dec. 1975
+
+;
+S. Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Reserva Ecologica Ñacuñan
+;
+
+Dec. 1990
+
+;
+Zunino
+,
+Barbero Valdinazzi
+leg.;
+
+CEMT
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Reserva Ñacuñán
+;
+
+Dec. 1975
+
+;
+Arturo Roig
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+San Carlos
+,
+Laguna del Diamante
+;
+
+31 Dec. 2015
+
+;
+F. Aballay
+&
+F. Jofré
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+San Rafael
+,
+
+20 km
+N Ruta
+
+146;
+
+14 Jan. 2019
+
+;
+S. Roig
+,
+R. Carrara
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+San Rafael
+,
+22 km
+W 25
+de Mayo
+;
+
+17 Dec. 1998
+
+;
+Flores
+&
+Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+6;
+San Rafael
+,
+
+30 km
+S Nihuil
+
+;
+
+15 Jan. 2019
+
+;
+S. Roig
+&
+R. Carrara
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+San Rafael
+;
+
+MNHN
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+San Rafael
+, RP 190,
+
+32 km
+S Punta de Agua
+
+;
+
+4 Jan. 2019
+
+;
+S. Roig
+&
+R. Carrara
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+San Rafael
+,
+Solar del Nihuil
+,
+
+20 km
+S El Nihuil
+
+;
+
+35 ° 10 ' S
+,
+68 ° 41 ' W
+
+;
+
+24 Fev. 2006
+
+;
+R. Carrara
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+Divisadero
+;
+
+11 Mar. 2005
+
+;
+A
+.
+Scollo
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+El Divijadero
+;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+21;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+Ñacuñan
+;
+
+12 Dec. 1998
+
+;
+S. Lagos
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+Ñacuñan
+;
+
+15 Dec. 1983
+
+;
+Videla Puig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+11;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+Ñacuñan
+;
+
+15 Dec. 1996
+
+;
+S. Lagos
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+5;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+Ñacuñan
+;
+
+16 Fev. 1982
+
+;
+S. Claver
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+3;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+Ñacuñan
+;
+
+16 Fev. 1996
+
+;
+G. Debandi
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+10;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+Ñacuñan
+;
+
+18 Jun. – 16 Jul. 1998
+
+;
+S. Lagos
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+Ñacuñan
+;
+
+20 Apr. 1998
+
+;
+S. Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+10;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+Ñacuñan
+;
+
+20 Nov. 1992
+
+;
+S. Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+3;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+Ñacuñan
+;
+
+24 Apr. 1998
+
+;
+S. Lagos
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+Ñacuñan
+;
+
+29 Dec. 1997
+
+–
+
+7 Fev. 1998
+
+;
+S. Lagos
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa,
+Ñacuñan
+;
+
+4 Fev. 1982
+
+;
+S. Claver
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+1 Dec. 1981
+
+;
+S. Claver
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+11–13 Dec. 2002
+
+;
+V. M. Diéguez
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+12 Dec. 1998
+
+;
+S. Lagos
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+3;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+12 Dec. 1998
+
+;
+S. Lagos
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+18 Jul. – 16 Aug. 1998
+
+;
+S. Lagos
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+20 Oct. – 22 Nov. 1997
+
+;
+S. Lagos
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+3;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+24 Set. 1995
+
+;
+C. Campos
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+26 Mar. 1984
+
+;
+Ruig Videla
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+27 Jan. 1994
+
+;
+M. Lacomi
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+9;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+3 Dec. 1981
+
+;
+S. Claver
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+5;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+7 Fev. 1998
+
+;
+S. Lagos
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+9 Nov. 1996
+
+;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+Fev. 1974
+
+;
+A
+.
+Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+Mar. 1976
+
+;
+F. Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa, Reserva Ñacuñan;
+
+Apr. 1976
+
+;
+S. Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Telteca
+;
+
+15 Dec. 1994
+
+–
+
+3 Fev. 1995
+
+;
+Flores
+&
+Roig
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+• 1;
+C. Bruch
+leg.;
+
+MACN
+
+• 1;
+
+MNHN
+
+• 13; MLPA •
+
+1;
+
+MACN
+
+. –
+
+Misiones
+
+
+• 2; 1932;
+K. J. Hayward
+leg.
+
+NHMUK
+
+. –
+
+
+Neuquén
+
+• 2;
+Añelo
+;
+
+24 Nov. 1976
+
+;
+O. de Ferraris
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Confluencia
+,
+Estación Challacó
+;
+C. Bruch
+leg.;
+
+MACN
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Plaza Huincul
+;
+
+29 Oct. 1970
+
+;
+M. Gentili
+leg.
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Ramon
+M.
+Castro
+;
+
+25 Set. 1971
+
+;
+M. Gentili
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa
+Rosa, Sierra Auca Mahuida;
+
+22 Mar. 2002
+
+;
+Bernardo Parisek
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Villa La Angostura
+,
+Cerro Bayo
+;
+
+15 Oct. 1982
+
+;
+M. Gentili
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+• 1;
+C. Bruch
+leg.;
+
+MACN
+
+• 5; 1907;
+Dr. Adolf Lendl
+leg.;
+
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+2;
+Zapala
+,
+Cerro Mesa
+,
+
+20 km
+E Zapala
+
+(
+Ruta
+16);
+
+8 Dec. 2017
+
+;
+E. Stevani
+,
+G. Flores
+,
+R. Carrara
+,
+F. Aballay
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+. –
+
+Río Negro
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Pringles
+;
+
+Mar. 1895
+
+;
+Koehler
+leg.; MLPA
+
+•
+
+1;
+Río Colorado
+;
+
+13–19 Nov. 1946
+
+;
+Willink
+leg.;
+
+IFML
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Villa Regina
+;
+
+Oct. 1961
+
+;
+
+DZUP
+
+
+•
+
+4;
+Village de Patagones
+[= Viedma], “ salinas d’Andrés Paz ”;
+
+Mar. – Apr. 1829
+
+;
+A
+.
+d’Orbigny
+leg.;
+
+MNHN
+
+. –
+
+La
+Rioja
+
+
+•
+
+Castro Barros
+;
+
+18 Fev. 1939
+
+;
+Biraben-Scott
+leg.; MLPA
+
+• 1; MLPA. –
+
+
+Salta
+
+• 1;
+Cafayate
+(
+Yacochuya
+);
+
+6 Apr. 1988
+
+;
+Stange
+y
+Willink
+leg.;
+
+IFML
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Cafayate
+,
+Tolombóm
+;
+
+9 Nov. 1995
+
+;
+G. Flores
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Merán
+;
+
+Mar. 1929
+
+;
+
+IFML
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Piedra del Molino
+;
+
+Dec. 1990
+
+;
+
+CMNC
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Ruiz
+de los
+Llanos
+;
+
+Fev. 1947
+
+;
+R. Golbach
+leg.;
+
+IFML
+
+
+. –
+
+
+San Luis
+
+• 1;
+
+18 km
+S Arionza
+
+;
+
+18–26 Jan. 1982
+
+; H &
+A
+Howden
+leg;
+
+CMNC
+
+
+•
+
+3;
+Belgrano
+, Fundo
+El
+Molle;
+
+15–20 Jan. 2007
+
+;
+José Gómez
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Belgrano
+, Fundo
+El
+Molle;
+
+20–28 Jan. 2013
+
+;
+G. Arriágada
+leg.;
+
+CEMT
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Belgrano
+, Fundo
+El
+Molle;
+
+33 ° 2 ' 22 " S
+,
+66 ° 30 ' 47 " W
+
+;
+
+10–15 Jan. 2009
+
+;
+José Gómez
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+3;
+Belgrano
+,
+San Isidro
+;
+
+Jan. 2007
+
+;
+E. Abadie
+leg.;
+
+CEMT
+
+
+•
+
+4;
+Desaguadero
+;
+
+15 Jan. 1998
+
+;
+Daniel Velasquez
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Desaguadero
+;
+
+4–7 Jan. 2008
+
+:
+V. M. Diéguez
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+4;
+Jarilla
+;
+
+Dec. 1974
+
+;
+S. Roig
+leg.;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+San Jeronimo
+;
+
+Nov. 1974
+
+;
+S. Roig
+leg;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+•
+
+6;
+Suyuque
+; MLPA
+
+. –
+
+
+Santiago del Estero
+
+• 3;
+Choya
+;
+
+Apr. 1968
+
+;
+M. Viana
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Estación Puni-Tajo
+;
+
+11 Dec. 1939
+
+;
+Biraben
+-
+Bezzi
+leg.; MLPA
+
+•
+
+5;
+Icano
+,
+Rio Salado
+; 1910;
+E. R. Wagner
+leg.;
+
+MNHN
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+La
+Banda;
+
+Oct. 1945
+
+;
+Briones-Prosen
+leg.;
+
+CMNC
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Lago Muyo
+;
+
+29 Mar. – 12 Apr. 1957
+
+;
+R. Golbach
+leg.;
+
+IFML
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Mal Paso
+;
+
+Oct. 1946
+
+;
+Ruiz Huidobro
+leg.;
+
+IFML
+
+
+•
+
+2;
+Monte Quemado
+;
+
+MACN
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Río Salado
+;
+Wagner
+leg.; MLPA
+
+• 2;
+
+MNHN
+
+•
+
+2;
+
+Jan. 1952
+
+;
+
+IADIZA
+
+
+. –
+
+
+Tucumán
+
+• 1;
+Cruz Alta
+,
+La Soledad
+,
+Cañete
+;
+
+27 Jan. 1966
+
+;
+Bucher
+leg.;
+
+IFML
+
+
+• 1;
+
+MNHN
+
+.
+
+
+
+BOLIVIA
+
+• 3;
+
+NHMUK
+
+.
+
+
+
+CHILE
+
+• 8;
+
+NHMUK
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+PARAGUAY
+
+–
+
+Amambay
+
+• 1;
+P. N.
+[National Park]
+Cerro Corá
+;
+
+30 Mar. 2003
+
+;
+R. Garcés
+leg.;
+
+CVMD
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/87/7B/68/877B68D2BDD15340A3E3E1E75489F301.xml b/data/87/7B/68/877B68D2BDD15340A3E3E1E75489F301.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..35c797240f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/87/7B/68/877B68D2BDD15340A3E3E1E75489F301.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,670 @@
+
+
+
+New species and a fascinating diversity of Chironomidae (Diptera, Insecta) in and around an overlooked urban vernal pool
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Namayandeh, Armin
+0000-0003-2136-0497
+Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, ON, Canada & Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Guerra, Sergio
+https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7614-5314
+Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Islam, Natasha
+https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8270-4004
+Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+James, Taylor
+Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Hudson, Patrick L.
+0000-0002-7646-443X
+5597 New Meadow Drive, Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Ghaderi, Edris
+0000-0002-9875-7735
+Department of Fisheries Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran & Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yusuf, Thameena
+https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6296-6693
+Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Vasquez, Adrian A.
+0000-0002-2434-3388
+Department of Biology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Mercer University, 1501 Mercer University Drive, Macon, GA 31207, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Ram, Jeffrey L.
+0000-0002-1063-546X
+Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+1208
+
+
+133
+163
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1208.124495
+FFB06B11-084A-4C08-A050-AFBA7655DF2F
+
+
+
+
+
+Limnophyes stagnum
+Namayandeh, Guerra & Ram
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figs 8
+,
+9
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+1 male
+;
+USA
+,
+Michigan
+,
+Detroit
+,
+Palmer Park
+,
+Pond A
+;
+
+42.42766 ° N
+,
+83.11741 ° W
+
+; leg.
+P. L. Hudson
+;
+
+29. xi. 2023
+
+, dep.
+
+ARC
+
+
+.
+
+Paratypes
+
+2 males
+,
+3 females
+; same as
+holotype
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnostic characters.
+
+
+Adults of this species can be separated from other
+
+Limnophyes
+
+by the combination of the following characteristics: Adults with no thoracic lanceolate setae and 2 prescutellars; adult male without humeral setae, female with single humeral setae; male with 3 epimerons, 1 posterior anepisternum II, 1–2 preepisternals anteriorly parallel to antepronotum and close to anapleural suture; female with 2 posterior anepisternals II; 6 epimeron II; 11 preepisternals which 9 anteriorly clustered horizontally, separated from 2 vertical; male antenna with 10 flagellomeres and AR 0.86; female antenna with 4 flagellomere and AR 0.5; male anal point extremely short, almost receded, wide and triangular with apex rounded and gonostylus expanded evenly from base to apex; female with apodeme lobe not distinct; cercus pediform.
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Male
+(
+n
+= 3, unless otherwise indicated). Total length
+1.8–1.9 mm
+. Wing
+0.91–1.1 mm
+long and
+0.3 mm
+wide.
+
+
+
+Coloration
+.
+
+Head, thorax, legs, tergites, sternites, and hypopygium blackish brown. Wings and halters grey.
+
+
+Head
+(Fig.
+8 A, B
+). Antenna with 10 flagellomeres, last flagellomere with 4 sensilla chaetica, groove starts at the apex of the second segment (Fig.
+8 A
+), AR 0.86 (
+n
+= 1). Eyes bare, without dorsomedial extension. Temporal setae 1 inner vertical (Fig.
+8 B
+). Tentorium 113–123, 118 μm long. Clypeus triangular, 82–95, 88 μm long and 106–125, 116 μm wide, bearing 8–10, 9 setae, setae 42–71, 56 μm long. Palpal segment lengths (in μm): 38, 36, 58, 54, 83 (
+n
+= 1).
+
+
+
+Thorax
+(Fig.
+9 B
+). Acrostichals 5; dorsocentrals 8–12,
+9 in
+a single row; prealars 5; scutellars
+4 in
+single row; 1 humerals, non-lanceolate; 2 prescutellars non-lanceolate; 7 antepronotals; 2 posterior anepisternals II; 6 epimeron II; 11 preepisternals, 9 clustered horizontally close to epimeron, 4 horizontally arching close to anapleural suture.
+
+
+Wing
+(Fig.
+9 C
+). Brachiolum with 1 seta. Squama bare.
+R
+with 3–8, 5 setae,
+R
+1
+with 4–5 setae;
+R
+4 + 5
+with 9–10 setae; other veins bare. Costa extension 50–74, 62 μm. Microtrichia visible at 10 × magnification.
+
+
+
+Legs
+.
+
+Hind and mid femur with keel. Fore tibia spur 22–23 μm long, mid tibia spur 21 μm long, second one broken; hind tibia missing. Lengths and proportions of legs as in Table
+4
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Female leg lengths (μm) and proportions of
+
+Limnophyes stagnum
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
fe
+
ti
+
+ta
+1
+
+
+ta
+2
+
+
+ta
+3
+
+
+ta
+4
+
+
+ta
+5
+
+
LR
+
BV
+
SV
+
+
+
+
+P
+1
+
+
+
358
+
440
+
224
+
135
+
86
+
51
+
22
+
0.50
+
3.0
+
3.6
+
+
+
+
+P
+2
+
+
+
440
+
427
+
190
+
90
+
61
+
39
+
64
+
0.40
+
4.2
+
4.6
+
+
+
+
+P
+3
+
+
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
+
+
+
+
+Genitalia
+(Figs
+9 D, E
+). Seminal capsules 62–89, 72 μm long, and 47–90, 71 μm wide, semi-circular; spermathecal very long, with well-developed bulb (Fig.
+9 D
+). Notum 76–113, 92 µm long, notum and ramus 143–191, 165 µm long. Gonapophysis VIII divided into ventrolateral and thin dorsomesal lobe (Fig.
+9 D
+). Apodeme lobe not distinct. Gonocoxite developed, triangular with around 6–9 setae (Fig.
+9 E
+). Tergite IX undivided. Cercus small, pediform, 58–72, 65 µm long, and 42–54, 48 µm wide (Fig.
+9 E
+).
+
+
+Immatures.
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The species is named after the habitat where it is found. The word
+
+stagnum
+
+is Latin, meaning pond or pool.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Canada
+(
+British Columbia
+,
+Ontario
+);
+USA
+(
+Michigan
+).
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+
+
+This is a very unusual
+
+Limnophyes
+species
+
+; lack of lanceolate setae on both sexes, lack of humeral setae in males, and single humeral setae in females are distinguishing characteristics. However, the Neotropical species
+
+Limnophyes brachyarthra
+(Edwards, 1931)
+
+described by
+Sæther (1990)
+also lacks lanceolate setae and humerals. The adults of
+
+L. stagnum
+
+sp. nov.
+can be easily separated from those of
+
+L. brachyarthra
+
+based on the number of antennal flagellomere and AR. Additionally, the chaetotaxy of the thorax varies between the two species, and adult males have gonostylus of different shapes and sizes. According to
+Sæther (1985)
+the placement of lanceolate humeral setae in relation to the humeral pit varies among
+
+Limnophyes
+species.
+
+The lanceolate setae can be in or on the margin of humeral pit, concentrated around or above the pit, or scattered over the humerals. Although the lanceolate setae are missing in
+
+L. stagnum
+
+sp. nov.
+, the humeral seta of the female is located on the pit, similar to that in
+
+L. natalensis
+
+. The shape of the hypopygium of the new species also resembles
+
+Limnophyes natalensis
+Kieffer, 1914
+
+as well as
+
+Limnopyes difficilis
+Brundin, 1947
+
+. The adult male of the new species can be separated from the adult males of
+
+L. natalensis
+
+and
+
+L. difficilis
+
+based on the number of antennal flagellomeres, antennal ratio, lack of lanceolate and humeral setae, number and formation of thoracic setation, and bare squama. The adult female of the new species can be separated from the adult females of
+
+L. natalensis
+
+and
+
+L. difficilis
+
+based on the number of humeral setae, number and formation of thoracic setation, bare squama, and size of the notum.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/91/E0/E2/91E0E2086F9B525B9E6564F2976E63D1.xml b/data/91/E0/E2/91E0E2086F9B525B9E6564F2976E63D1.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..577e73d15b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/91/E0/E2/91E0E2086F9B525B9E6564F2976E63D1.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,489 @@
+
+
+
+An illustrated catalogue of South American species of Omorgus Erichson, 1847 (Coleoptera, Trogidae, Omorginae) including a neotype designation and taxonomical changes
+
+
+
+Author
+
+da Costa-Silva, Vinícius
+0000-0002-4556-3793
+Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X 20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa & Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Strümpher, Werner P.
+0000-0002-7047-2666
+Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 413, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Barclay, Maxwell V. L.
+0000-0003-4989-2014
+Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z.
+0000-0001-9697-320X
+Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+81
+101
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e126799
+339AB68C-DCB1-435F-B88E-2C42D0A7B05E
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+borrei
+(
+Harold, 1872
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Trox borrei
+
+Harold, 1872: 84
+(original description);
+
+Bruch 1911: 193
+
+(checklist);
+
+Arrow 1912: 54
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Blackwelder 1944: 218
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Vaurie 1962: 147
+
+(redescription).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Trox
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+borrei
+
+
+:
+
+Scholtz 1982: 9
+
+(catalogue).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+borrei
+
+
+:
+
+Scholtz 1986 a
+: 361
+
+(phylogenetics);
+
+Scholtz 1990: 1417
+
+(redescription);
+
+Zidek 2013: 8
+
+(checklist);
+
+Zidek 2017: 98
+
+(checklist);
+
+Costa-Silva et al. 2021: 2002
+
+(review of Brazilian species,
+lectotype
+designation).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus borrei
+
+
+:
+
+Deloya 2005: 122
+
+(checklist, as “
+borreri
+”);
+
+Morrone 2014: 78
+
+(mention, biogeography).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type specimen examined.
+
+
+
+
+Lectotype
+
+(
+
+
+RBINS
+
+
+).
+See
+Costa-Silva et al. (2021: 2002)
+for high-quality images of the type specimen.
+Type locality
+: “
+Montevideo
+,
+Uruguay
+”.
+
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution.
+
+
+Argentina
+,
+Bolivia
+,
+Brazil
+,
+Paraguay
+and
+Uruguay
+(
+Vaurie 1962
+;
+Scholtz 1990
+;
+Costa-Silva et al. 2021
+).
+
+
+
+
+Non-type examined material
+
+
+
+(
+23 specimens
+additionally to
+Costa-Silva et al. 2021
+).
+
+
+ARGENTINA
+–
+
+Chaco
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♂
+and 1 unsexed;
+Charata
+;
+
+Dec. 1995
+
+;
+S. Bolle
+leg.;
+
+NHMUK
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Pampa del Infierno
+;
+
+Set. 1982
+
+,
+A
+.
+Martinez
+leg.;
+
+CMNC
+
+. –
+
+Currientes
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♀
+;
+Bella Vista
+,
+Bords du Parana
+;
+
+Dec. 1903
+
+,
+E. R. Wagner
+leg.;
+
+MNHN
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+
+15 Mar. 1827
+
+–
+
+20 Apr. 1828
+
+,
+d’Orbigny
+leg.;
+
+MNHN
+
+. –
+
+Misiones
+
+
+• 1; 1932;
+K. J. Hayward
+leg.
+
+NHMUK
+
+. –
+
+
+Santa Fe
+
+• 1;
+Villa Ana
+;
+
+Nov. 1925
+
+,
+K. J. Hayward
+leg.;
+
+NHMUK
+
+
+. –
+
+
+Santiago del Estero
+
+•
+1 ♂
+and 7 unsexed;
+El Pinto
+;
+
+Dec. 1956
+
+;
+
+CNC
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♀
+;
+Icaño
+,
+Edges of Rio Salado
+;
+
+Dec. 1910
+
+,
+E. R. Wagner
+leg.;
+
+MNHN
+
+
+.
+
+
+BOLIVIA
+• 1; Jansen leg.;
+
+NHMUK
+
+.
+
+
+BRAZIL
+• 1; Matto Grosso (sic!); 1886; P. Germain leg.;
+
+MNHN
+
+.
+
+
+
+PARAGUAY
+–
+
+Presidente Hayes
+
+• 2;
+Nanawa
+, “ Paraguayan Chaco ”;
+
+Mar. 1927
+
+;
+G. S. Carter
+leg.;
+
+NHMUK
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+URUGUAY
+–
+
+Artigas
+
+• 1;
+20 km
+SE
+Artigas
+;
+
+30 ° 31 ' S
+,
+56 ° 22 ' W
+
+;
+
+27 Dec. 2002
+
+,
+S. & J. Peck
+leg.;
+
+CMNC
+
+
+. –
+
+
+Montevideo
+
+• 1; Montevideo;
+
+MNHN
+
+. –
+Without specific locality
+
+•
+
+1 ♀
+;
+
+MNHN
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/A1/82/B4/A182B442C86E55DAB2E2411DCF6DE621.xml b/data/A1/82/B4/A182B442C86E55DAB2E2411DCF6DE621.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e7ad59e87c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/A1/82/B4/A182B442C86E55DAB2E2411DCF6DE621.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
+
+
+
+An illustrated catalogue of South American species of Omorgus Erichson, 1847 (Coleoptera, Trogidae, Omorginae) including a neotype designation and taxonomical changes
+
+
+
+Author
+
+da Costa-Silva, Vinícius
+0000-0002-4556-3793
+Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X 20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa & Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Strümpher, Werner P.
+0000-0002-7047-2666
+Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 413, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Barclay, Maxwell V. L.
+0000-0003-4989-2014
+Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z.
+0000-0001-9697-320X
+Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+81
+101
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e126799
+339AB68C-DCB1-435F-B88E-2C42D0A7B05E
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+nocheles
+Scholtz, 1990
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 5
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+nocheles
+
+Scholtz, 1990: 1412
+(original description);
+
+Gómez 2008: 515
+
+(key for Argentinean species);
+
+Zidek 2013: 14
+
+(checklist);
+
+Zidek 2017: 105
+
+(checklist);
+
+Smith 2017: 86
+
+(notes).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus nocheles
+
+
+:
+
+Deloya 2005: 122
+
+(checklist).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type specimen examined.
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+, by original designation
+
+(
+♂
+
+
+LACM
+
+
+).
+First
+label [white, typeset]: “ El Bolson, Rio Negro, /
+ARGENTINA
+/
+
+Oct. 24–25, 1956
+
+/ Andor Kovacs ”.
+Second
+label [white with red border,
+Clarke Scholtz’s
+handwriting]: “
+
+Omorgus
+
+/
+
+nocheles
+
+/ 1988 / Scholtz /
+HOLOTYPE
+”.
+Third
+label [white, printed]: “ [QR Code] /
+
+LACM
+
+ENT 160322
+” (
+Fig.
+5 E
+).
+Type locality
+: “ Argentina, El Bolsón, Río Negro ”.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype of
+
+Omorgus nocheles
+Scholtz, 1990
+
+.
+A.
+Habitus in dorsal view;
+B.
+Habitus in lateral view;
+C.
+Aedeagus in dorsal view;
+D.
+Aedeagus in lateral view;
+E.
+Labels. Photos by Brian Brown (
+LACM
+). Length of specimen: 15.5–16.5 mm.
+
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution.
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+O.
+)
+nocheles
+
+is known only from
+two specimens
+collected in
+1956 in
+El Bolsón,
+Argentina
+(
+Scholtz 1990
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/AA/E4/16/AAE41682797B55719EB05CFA4076CFA2.xml b/data/AA/E4/16/AAE41682797B55719EB05CFA4076CFA2.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d12e0012f9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/AA/E4/16/AAE41682797B55719EB05CFA4076CFA2.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,425 @@
+
+
+
+An illustrated catalogue of South American species of Omorgus Erichson, 1847 (Coleoptera, Trogidae, Omorginae) including a neotype designation and taxonomical changes
+
+
+
+Author
+
+da Costa-Silva, Vinícius
+0000-0002-4556-3793
+Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X 20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa & Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Strümpher, Werner P.
+0000-0002-7047-2666
+Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 413, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Barclay, Maxwell V. L.
+0000-0003-4989-2014
+Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z.
+0000-0001-9697-320X
+Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+81
+101
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e126799
+339AB68C-DCB1-435F-B88E-2C42D0A7B05E
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Haroldomorgus
+)
+batesi
+(
+Harold, 1872
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Trox batesi
+
+Harold, 1872: 126
+(original description);
+
+Arrow 1912: 54
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Blackwelder 1944: 218
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Vaurie 1962: 154
+
+(redescription).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Trox
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+batesi
+
+
+:
+
+Scholtz 1982: 8
+
+(catalogue).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Haroldomorgus
+)
+batesi
+
+
+:
+
+Scholtz 1986 a
+: 362
+
+(phylogenetics);
+
+Scholtz 1990: 1418
+
+(redescription);
+
+Zidek 2013: 7
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Strümpher et al. 2014: 549
+
+(systematics);
+
+Strümpher et al. 2016: 62
+
+(systematics);
+
+Zidek 2017: 98
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Hielkema and Hielkema 2019: 10
+
+(checklist for the Guianas);
+
+Costa-Silva et al. 2021: 1997
+
+(review of Brazilian species).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus batesi
+
+
+:
+
+Deloya 2005: 122
+
+(checklist).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type specimen examined.
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+(
+♂
+
+
+MNHN
+
+
+).
+See
+Costa-Silva et al. (2021: 1997)
+for high-quality images of the type specimen.
+Type locality
+: “ Amazonestrom ” [
+Amazonas
+River].
+
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution.
+
+
+Argentina
+,
+Bolivia
+,
+Brazil
+and
+Paraguay
+(
+Zidek 2017
+;
+Costa-Silva et al. 2021
+).
+
+
+
+
+Non-type examined material
+
+
+
+(
+four specimens
+additionally to
+Scholtz (1990)
+and
+Costa-Silva et al. (2021)
+).
+
+
+BRAZIL
+–
+
+Amazonas
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Parana
+da
+Eva
+;
+
+8 Nov. 1969
+
+;
+J. M.
+& B.
+A
+.
+Campbell
+leg.;
+
+CNC
+
+. –
+
+Mato Grosso
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Juina
+;
+
+1 Oct. 2022
+
+;
+K. R. Ferreira
+leg;
+
+CEMT
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Santa Cruz do Xingu
+,
+Faz. da Ilha
+;
+
+9 ° 45 ' 41 " S
+,
+52 ° 15 ' 41 " W
+
+;
+UV light trap
+;
+
+11–17 Jan. 2024
+
+;
+D. F. Rodrigues
+&
+T. I. Vitor-da-Silva
+leg.;
+
+CEMT
+
+. –
+
+Rio de Janeiro
+
+
+•
+
+1 ♀
+;
+Magé
+,
+70 km
+N [north] of
+Rio de Janeiro
+;
+
+15 Oct. – 10 Nov. 1999
+
+;
+W. Grosser
+leg.;
+
+NHMUK
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Note.
+
+
+The monotypic subgenus
+
+Haroldomorgus
+Scholtz, 1986 a
+
+was established to accommodate
+
+Trox batesi
+Harold, 1872
+
+, following a morphological phylogenetic analysis aimed at elucidating the suprageneric relationships within
+Trogidae
+(refer to Scholtz, 1986 a for details). One of the most distinctive features of
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Haroldomorgus
+)
+
+species is a complete absence of tubercles or ridges on the pronotum and elytra. Additionally, this species exhibits an oval-shaped scutellum that is not constricted at the base, which distinguishes it from the typical modern concept of
+
+Omorgus
+species.
+
+Following a morphological phylogenetic analysis conducted by some of the authors (
+VCS
+, WPS, and FZVM –
+Costa-Silva et al. in press
+), the genus
+
+Omorgus
+
+was recovered to be paraphyletic, restoring
+
+Haroldomorgus
+
+as a sister group to
+
+Omorgus
+
++
+
+Polynoncus
+
+. In the first and only molecular phylogeny of
+Trogidae
+performed to date, by
+Strümpher et al. (2014)
+, no specimens of
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Haroldomorgus
+)
+batesi
+
+were used in the analysis. However, we have now obtained fresh specimens to revisit the molecular analysis and finally test the
+Scholtz’s (1986 a
+) hypothesis and the position of
+
+Haroldomorgus
+
+within
+Trogidae
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/AD/D0/D4/ADD0D40BE88359D1A6767E32E3629EC7.xml b/data/AD/D0/D4/ADD0D40BE88359D1A6767E32E3629EC7.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..abb8f4535eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/AD/D0/D4/ADD0D40BE88359D1A6767E32E3629EC7.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,330 @@
+
+
+
+An illustrated catalogue of South American species of Omorgus Erichson, 1847 (Coleoptera, Trogidae, Omorginae) including a neotype designation and taxonomical changes
+
+
+
+Author
+
+da Costa-Silva, Vinícius
+0000-0002-4556-3793
+Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X 20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa & Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Strümpher, Werner P.
+0000-0002-7047-2666
+Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 413, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Barclay, Maxwell V. L.
+0000-0003-4989-2014
+Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z.
+0000-0001-9697-320X
+Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+81
+101
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e126799
+339AB68C-DCB1-435F-B88E-2C42D0A7B05E
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+indigenus
+Scholtz, 1990
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 4
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+indigenus
+
+Scholtz 1990: 1411
+(original description);
+
+Zidek 2013: 11
+
+(checklist);
+
+Zidek 2017: 102
+
+(checklist).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus indigenus
+
+
+:
+
+Morrone 2001: 63
+
+(mention);
+
+Deloya 2005: 122
+
+(checklist);
+
+Morrone 2014: 62
+
+(mention, biogeography).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type specimens examined.
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+, by original designation
+
+(
+♂
+
+
+CMNC
+
+
+). First label [white, typeset]: “ ECU: Galap; Espanola /
+Bahia Manzanilla
+/ 5–10. VI. 85, S & J Peck / Prospis grove behind / beach,
+carrion traps
+”. Second label [white with black border, printed]: “ [QR code] / Canadian Museum of / Musée canadien de la / NATURE / CMNCEN 00011596 ”. Third label [white with red border, Clarke Scholtz’s handwriting]:
+
+Omorgus
+
+/ indigenous /
+C. H. Scholtz
+1988 /
+HOLOTYPE
+”.
+Type locality
+: “
+Bahia Manzanilla
+, Española Is.,
+Galapagos
+” [
+Ecuador
+].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype of
+
+Omorgus indigenus
+Scholtz 1990
+
+.
+A.
+Habitus in dorsal view;
+B.
+Habitus in lateral view;
+C.
+Aedeagus in dorsal view;
+D.
+Aedeagus in lateral view;
+E.
+Labels. Photos by François Génier (
+CMNC
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Paratypes
+examined
+
+:
+ECUADOR
+–
+
+Galapagos
+
+
+•
+
+15;
+Española Is.
+,
+Bahia Manzanilla
+;
+Prosopis
+grove behind beach;
+carrion traps
+;
+
+5–10 Jun. 1985
+
+;
+S. & J. Peck
+leg.;
+
+CMNC
+
+
+•
+
+2; same collection data;
+
+NHMUK
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution.
+
+
+Endemic to
+Galapagos Islands
+[
+Ecuador
+].
+
+
+
+
+Non-type examined material
+
+
+
+(
+24 specimens
+).
+
+
+ECUADOR
+–
+
+Galapagos
+
+
+•
+
+3;
+Española Is.
+,
+Bahia Manzanilla
+;
+
+5–10 Jun. 1985
+
+;
+S. & J. Peck
+leg.;
+
+CMNC
+
+
+•
+
+15;
+Galapagos
+,
+Española Is.
+,
+Bahia Manzanilla
+;
+
+25 Apr. – 2 May 1985
+
+;
+S. Peck
+leg.;
+
+CMNC
+
+
+•
+
+6;
+Galapagos
+,
+Española Is.
+,
+Pta. Suarez
+;
+
+2 Jun. 1992
+
+;
+S. Peck
+leg.;
+
+CMNC
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/AE/A5/7F/AEA57F1722625230AFA0B36F70AD9613.xml b/data/AE/A5/7F/AEA57F1722625230AFA0B36F70AD9613.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2c280c660b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/AE/A5/7F/AEA57F1722625230AFA0B36F70AD9613.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,498 @@
+
+
+
+New species and a fascinating diversity of Chironomidae (Diptera, Insecta) in and around an overlooked urban vernal pool
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Namayandeh, Armin
+0000-0003-2136-0497
+Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, ON, Canada & Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Guerra, Sergio
+https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7614-5314
+Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Islam, Natasha
+https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8270-4004
+Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+James, Taylor
+Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Hudson, Patrick L.
+0000-0002-7646-443X
+5597 New Meadow Drive, Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Ghaderi, Edris
+0000-0002-9875-7735
+Department of Fisheries Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran & Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yusuf, Thameena
+https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6296-6693
+Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Vasquez, Adrian A.
+0000-0002-2434-3388
+Department of Biology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Mercer University, 1501 Mercer University Drive, Macon, GA 31207, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Ram, Jeffrey L.
+0000-0002-1063-546X
+Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+1208
+
+
+133
+163
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1208.124495
+FFB06B11-084A-4C08-A050-AFBA7655DF2F
+
+
+
+
+
+Bryophaenocladius palmerparcum
+Namayandeh & Hudson
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 7 A – D
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+1 male
+;
+USA
+,
+Michigan
+,
+Detroit
+,
+Palmer Park
+,
+Pond A
+;
+
+42.42766 ° N
+,
+83.11741 ° W
+
+; leg.
+P. L. Hudson
+;
+
+30. vi. 2022
+
+, dep.
+
+ARC
+
+
+.
+
+Paratypes
+
+2 males
+; same as
+holotype
+except leg. A. Namayandeh;
+28. vi. 2023
+, dep.
+
+ARC
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnostic characters.
+
+
+The adult male of
+
+B. palmerparcum
+
+sp. nov.
+can be distinguished from other
+
+Bryophaenocladius
+Thienemann, 1934
+
+males by the combination of the following characters: AR 1.4–1.5; costa not well-extended; anal point short, wide, and triangular, not surpassing the apex of tergite IX, with 11–15 setae; virga inconspicuous, consists of two long spines, looped; sternapodeme straight without large oral projections; superior volsella collar shaped; inferior volsella absent; gonostylus straight with a mid-section wide, and short collar-shaped crista
+
+dorsalis
+
+; HR 1.5–1.9; HV 2.6–2.9.
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Male
+(
+n
+= 3; unless otherwise stated). Total length
+2.7–3.4 mm
+, Wing
+1.4–1.7 mm
+long and
+0.4 mm
+wide.
+
+
+
+Coloration
+.
+
+Head, abdomen, and halter dark brown. Thorax dark brown with much paler yellowish areas in portion of dorsocentrals, in anteprontal, anepisternum, and apical portion of preepisternum regions. Legs golden brown. Wing greyish brown.
+
+
+Head
+(Fig.
+7 A, B
+). Antenna with 13 flagellomere, last flagellomere with 10 sensilla chaetica, each of 2
+nd
+and 3
+rd
+flagellomere with pair of sensilla chaetica; shaft starts at base of 4
+th
+flagellomere (Fig.
+7 A
+); AR 1.4–1.5. Temporal setae 9, uniserial. Tentorium 150–190 µm long, tentorial pit close to apex. Clypeus squared, 101 µm long and 125 µm wide, with 20 setae, setae 73 µm long (
+n
+= 1). Palpal segments lengths (in μm): 55–77, 66; 33–57, 45; 157–164, 161; 125–131, 128; 93, third palpomere with 3 sensilla clavata, and without any projection.
+
+
+
+Thorax
+(Fig.
+7 C
+): Achrostichals 8–10, starting close to antepronotum; dorsocentrals 12–23,
+18 in
+two rows; prealars 4–6, 5; scutellars 12; antepronotals 3 basoventrally.
+
+
+Wing
+(Fig.
+7 D
+): Brachiolum with 2 setae;
+R
+with 7–13, 10 setae;
+R
+1
+with 4 setae;
+R
+4 + 5
+with 4 setae; other veins bare. Squama with 7–8 setae. Anal lobe produced and squared. Costa not well-extended, 17–20, 18 µm long. Microtrichia visible at 10 × magnification.
+
+
+
+Legs
+.
+
+Foreleg spur 58 μm long (
+n
+= 1), midleg spur 30 μm long (
+n
+= 1), other spur damaged; hindleg spurs damaged, hind tarsus missing, hindleg comb with 12 spines (
+n
+= 1). Lengths and proportions of legs as in Table
+2
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Male leg lengths (μm) and proportions of
+
+Bryophaenocladius palmerparcum
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
fe
+
ti
+
+ta
+1
+
+
+ta
+2
+
+
+ta
+3
+
+
+ta
+4
+
+
+ta
+5
+
+
LR
+
BV
+
SV
+
+
+
+
+P
+1
+
+
+
627
+
748
+
729
+
252
+
169
+
116
+
81
+
0.97
+
3.4
+
1.9
+
+
+
+
+P
+2
+
+
+
718
+
805
+
391
+
214
+
142
+
104
+
73
+
0.50
+
–
+
0.50
+
+
+
+
+P
+3
+
+
+
828
+
990
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
–
+
+
+
+
+
+Hypopygium
+(Fig.
+7 E
+): Anal point short, wide, and triangular, not surpassing the apex of tergite IX, 18 μm long and 34 μm wide at the base (
+n
+= 1), surface with 11–15, 12 setae. Virga inconspicuous, consists of two long spines, looped, 58 μm long (
+n
+= 1). Sternapodeme straight with large oral projections, 84–104, 97 μm long. Phallapodeme 42–50, 45 μm long. Superior volsella collar shaped, inferior volsella absent. Gonocoxite 158–216, 187 μm long. Gonostylus straight with a mid-section wide and short collar-shaped crista
+
+dorsalis
+
+, gonostylus 102–114, 110 μm long, megaseta 9 μm long. HR 1.5–1.9, 1.7; HV 2.6–2.9, 2.8.
+
+
+Female and immatures.
+unknown.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The species is named after the locality where it is found, Palmer Park. The word
+parcum
+is Latin, meaning park.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+USA
+(
+Michigan
+).
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+
+
+A combination of strong decumbent achrostichals close to antepronotum; bare wing with strong punctation of microtrichia, and weak lateral spines attached to the shaft of hind and mid legs spines places this species in
+
+Bryophaenocladius
+
+. Although, in general, the long, prominent, and hyaline anal point defines many known species of
+
+Bryophaenocladius
+
+, the character of the short anal point of this species is not uncommon, and it has been observed among other known species of this genus. Previously,
+Donato et al. (2024)
+have demonstrated that the species of
+
+Bryophaenocladius
+
+show a significant pattern of anal point size and shape differences. For instance, among those species with short anal points,
+
+Bryophaenocladius scleras
+Wang, Liu &
+Epler, 2012
+
+from the Nearctic has a short semicircular anal point (see
+Wang et al. 2004
+), and
+
+Bryophaenocladius pleuralis
+(Malloch, 1915)
+
+has a dark short anal point that does not extend beyond tergite IX (
+Makarchenko and Makarchenko 2009
+). Additionally,
+Epler (2012)
+described brachypterous
+
+Bryophaenocladius chrissichuckorum
+
+with a wide and short, triangular anal point similar to that of
+
+B. palmerparcum
+
+sp. nov.
+The first author has also observed this character of short anal point in Neotropical species (AN pers. obs. of specimens from
+Costa Rica
+). What is also observable is that besides the variation in shape and size of the anal point, as discussed in
+Donato et al. (2024)
+, those species with the short anal point can still possess the hyaline section, such as
+
+Bryophaenocladius inconstans
+Brundin, 1947
+
+and some lacking, such as the case of
+
+B. palmerparcum
+
+,
+
+B. chrissichuckorum
+
+and
+
+B. pleuralis
+
+. Therefore, the presence of an anterior hyaline section of the anal point can also separate species with a reduced anal point.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/BA/C7/6C/BAC76C222D505D2BA37175E418D5B1F8.xml b/data/BA/C7/6C/BAC76C222D505D2BA37175E418D5B1F8.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d65f580e903
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/BA/C7/6C/BAC76C222D505D2BA37175E418D5B1F8.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,354 @@
+
+
+
+An illustrated catalogue of South American species of Omorgus Erichson, 1847 (Coleoptera, Trogidae, Omorginae) including a neotype designation and taxonomical changes
+
+
+
+Author
+
+da Costa-Silva, Vinícius
+0000-0002-4556-3793
+Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X 20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa & Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Strümpher, Werner P.
+0000-0002-7047-2666
+Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 413, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Barclay, Maxwell V. L.
+0000-0003-4989-2014
+Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z.
+0000-0001-9697-320X
+Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+81
+101
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e126799
+339AB68C-DCB1-435F-B88E-2C42D0A7B05E
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+spatulatus
+(
+Vaurie, 1962
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 6
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Trox spatulatus
+
+Vaurie, 1962: 151
+(original description).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Trox
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+spatulatus
+
+
+:
+
+Scholtz 1982: 13
+
+(catalogue).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus spatulatus
+
+
+:
+
+Deloya 2005: 122
+
+(checklist).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+spatulatus
+
+
+:
+
+Scholtz 1990: 1404
+
+(redescription);
+
+Zidek 2013: 16
+
+(checklist);
+
+Zidek 2017: 108
+
+(checklist).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type specimen examined.
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+, by original designation
+
+(
+♂
+
+
+NHMB
+
+
+).
+First
+label [white aged, typeset]: “ Provincia /
+Buenos Aires
+”.
+Second
+label [white aged, unknown handwriting]: “ II [?] ”.
+Third
+label [white, typeset]: “ Museum Frey / Tutzing ”.
+Fourth
+label [red, Patricia Vaurie’s handwriting]: “ TYPE /
+
+Trox
+
+/
+
+spatulatus
+
+/ Vaurie ” (Fig.
+6 D
+).
+Type locality
+: “ Provincia
+Buenos Aires
+” [
+Argentina
+].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype of
+
+Trox spatulatus
+Vaurie, 1962
+
+(now
+
+Omorgus spatulatus
+
+).
+A.
+Habitus in dorsal view;
+B.
+Habitus in lateral view;
+C.
+Spiculum gastrale and aedeagus in dorsal view;
+D.
+Labels. Photos by Christoph Germann (
+NHMB
+). Length of specimen: 10 mm.
+
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution.
+
+
+Argentina
+(
+Vaurie 1962
+;
+Scholtz 1990
+).
+
+
+
+
+Non-type examined material
+
+
+
+(
+215 specimens
+).
+
+ARGENTINA
+–
+
+Buenos Aires
+
+
+
+• 1; La Plata; MLPA •
+
+12;
+Quéquen Puerto
+;
+
+7 Mar. 1928
+
+;
+M. D. Jurado
+leg.;
+
+MACN
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Quéquen Puerto
+;
+G. Pellerano
+leg.;
+
+MACN
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Quéquen
+;
+
+Fev. 1937
+
+;
+
+CEMT
+
+
+•
+
+1;
+Quéquen
+;
+
+Fev. 1937
+
+;
+
+DZUP
+
+
+• 12;
+A
+.
+Breyer
+leg.;
+
+MACN
+
+• 2;
+C. Bruch
+leg.
+
+MACN
+
+•
+
+175;
+
+MACN
+
+. –
+
+Córdoba
+
+
+•
+
+10;
+Miramar
+; MLPA
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/CB/20/AD/CB20AD95DD3E53A58D7FC3B88F1BCC17.xml b/data/CB/20/AD/CB20AD95DD3E53A58D7FC3B88F1BCC17.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b97fadd1d82
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/CB/20/AD/CB20AD95DD3E53A58D7FC3B88F1BCC17.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,399 @@
+
+
+
+Description of six new species of Cyrtodactylus Gray (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from northeastern India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Boruah, Bitupan
+0000-0001-8829-6069
+Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Narayanan, Surya
+0000-0001-9359-2815
+SM Sehgal Foundation Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Bangalore, Karnataka 560064, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Aravind, Neelavar Ananthram
+0000-0002-4515-8421
+SM Sehgal Foundation Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Bangalore, Karnataka 560064, India & Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya University, Derlakatte, Mangalore, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Lalronunga, Samuel
+0000-0002-7542-4815
+Holy Child Society, Nalkata, Tripura 799263, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Deepak, V.
+0000-0002-8826-9367
+Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK & School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE 1 7 RU, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Das, Abhijit
+0000-0002-5851-8457
+Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
+
+text
+
+
+Vertebrate Zoology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+453
+486
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/vz.74.e124752
+154CE236-EFA8-4411-834B-234A9B45A63F
+
+
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus siangensis
+Boruah, Narayanan, Aravind, Deepak & Das
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figure 9
+;
+Tables 2, S 2
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+.
+
+
+
+
+Adult female (WII-ADR 1177; Fig.
+9 A, B, E – I
+), from Kalek stream (
+
+28.1711 ° N
+;
+95.2420 ° E
+
+,
+
+elevation
+210 m
+a. s. l.
+
+; Fig.
+3 A
+);
+1.8 km
+(aerial distance) northwest from
+Bodak village
+,
+East Siang District
+,
+Arunachal Pradesh
+,
+India
+collected by
+Bitupan Boruah
+on
+
+23 October 2021
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus siangensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+A
+
+,
+B
+,
+E
+–
+I
+holotype (WII-ADR 1177),
+A
+dorsal, and
+B
+ventral view of whole body;
+C
+paratype (WII-ADR 1582);
+D
+paratype (WII-ADR 1581);
+E
+dorsal,
+F
+ventral, and
+G
+lateral view of the head (WII-ADR 1177);
+H
+ventral view of left manus, and
+I
+left pes (WII-ADR 1177);
+J
+an uncollected male in natural habitat from Jorsing, East Siang, Arunachal Pradesh. Scale bar: 10 mm.
+J
+not to scale.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Paratypes
+.
+
+
+
+Two adult
+females (WII-ADR 1581 and WII-ADR 1582; Fig.
+9 C, D
+) from a hill slope near Kalek stream, East Siang District,
+Arunachal Pradesh
+,
+India
+collected by Bitupan Boruah on
+15 June 2022
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Medium-sized gecko (
+SVL
+70.1–72.1 mm
+in females); males unknown; supralabials 8–12 and infralabials 9–12; tubercles on dorsum weakly keeled and bluntly conical, 26–32 paravertebral tubercles between the level of axilla and level of groin; 15 or 16 dorsal tubercle rows at mid body; 40–45 mid ventral scale rows; 8–10 small precloacal pores in a continuous series; 13–17 subdigital lamellae on finger IV and 14–19 subdigital lamellae on toe IV; six or seven irregular and broken dark-brown bands on dorsum between the level of axilla and level of groin, or irregular dark-brown reticulation on dorsum.
+
+
+
+
+
+Description of the
+holotype
+.
+
+
+
+Holotype
+well preserved except an incision below left axilla ventrolaterally. Snout-vent length
+72.1 mm
+. Head moderately large (
+HL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.26), dorsoventrally depressed, longer than width (
+HW
+/
+HL
+= 0.72), distinct from neck, broader at occipital region; snout rounded in both dorsal and lateral view; loreal region convex; canthus rostralis rounded, indistinct; interorbital space flat, a longitudinal furrow on dorsal surface of the snout, snout short (
+SO
+/
+HL
+= 0.39), longer than orbit (
+OD
+/
+SO
+= 0.73); nostril nearly rounded, opening directed posterolaterally; ear opening oval and oblique; scales on head heterogeneous, largest on snout and loreal region, posteriorly smaller in upper eyelid, interorbital space and occipital region, granular juxtaposed; scales on upper eyelids heterogeneous; supraciliaries outwardly sharp giving serrated appearance in dorsal view, size anteriorly and posteriorly decreases, largest at approximately anterior one third of it; rostral wide, a short groove at the middle on top, rostral connected with nasals, supranasals, an internasal and first supralabials; a single scale between the supranasals, larger than the rest of the granular snout scales; granular scales at parietal region and occipital region intermixed with slightly large rounded granular tubercles, dense in occipital and temporal region and size increases towards nape; supralabial eight on right and 11 on left side, supralabials upto midorbit seven on right and eight on left side, size decreases towards angle of jaw; a series of scales nearly rounded, granular and slightly larger than the loreal scales present above the supralabials; mental as wide as rostral, triangular, connected with first infralabials, inner postmentals; 10 infralabials on right and nine on left side, size decreases towards angle of jaw, first infralabials connected with mental, second infralabial, inner and outer postmentals; inner pair of postmentals are larger than the outer postmentals, posterior margin of the inner postmentals bordered by eight granular scales of different size; one or two rows of enlarged scales along the infralabials starting below the outer postmentals, posteriorly size of those decreases, elongated and narrow; rest of the gular scales are small, granular juxtaposed, homogeneous, size increases towards throat where they become imbricate.
+
+
+Habitus slender (
+BW
+/
+SVL
+= 0.18,
+TRL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.45), dorsoventrally depressed; dorsal scales granular, rounded, heterogeneous, intermixed with rounded, weakly keeled and bluntly conical tubercles irregularly arranged, starting from occipital region to fourth segment of the tail, size increases towards posterior body, pronounced at sacrum and base of the tail; 15 dorsal tubercles across mid dorsum; 26 paravertebral tubercles; ventrolateral fold weak; ventral scales larger than those of dorsal, flat, smooth, cycloid subimbricate to imbricate, largest on belly; 40 mid-ventral scales between ventrolateral fold; very small, 10 precloacal pores arranged in an inverted “
+V
+” shaped continuous series, followed by 7 unpored, large scales below it, largest at the apex.
+
+
+Forelimbs and hindlimbs slender (
+FL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.14,
+CL
+/
+SVL
+= 0.17); digits strongly inflected at the joints, all bearing large recurved claw, enlarged subdigital lamellae, lamellae beneath digit IV of right and left manus (given as basal + distal) is 6 + 11 and 6 + 10 respectively, the second most lower lamellae of the basal series of digit IV of both sides are divided (not included in lamellar count); lamellae beneath digit IV of right and left pes (given as basal + distal) is 7 + 11 and 6 + 10 respectively; dorsal scales on forelimbs heterogeneous, granular juxtaposed, smooth and subimbricate at distal end of forearm; forearm intermixed with a few rounded, large tubercles; dorsal scales of hindlimbs granular intermixed with large, rounded, bluntly conical tubercles; scales on thigh towards knee smooth subimbricate; ventral scales of forelimbs granular, juxtaposed, mostly homogeneous; scales on palm heterogeneous, granular juxtaposed; scales on hindlimbs smaller than those of belly, smooth, cycloid and subimbricate; scales on the knee, above cloaca and on thigh below the level of precloacal pores are smaller and granular; scales on soles heterogeneous, granular, juxtaposed to subimbricate.
+
+
+Tail complete, regenerated (
+TL
+=
+80 mm
+), slender, gradually tapering, segments indistinct; dorsal scales small, granular, juxtaposed at the base, posteriorly size increases, flat, smooth, subimbricate, heterogeneous in shape and size; large feebly keeled scales up to fourth segment of the tail at the distal end of each segment, those on basal segment are pronounced; subcaudal scales smooth, subimbricate, wider than that of dorsal, heterogeneous in shape and size; below cloaca scales are granular, smaller than the rest of the tail scales; no enlarged plate like series of subcaudal scales; three bluntly conical spurs on each side of the tail base present.
+
+
+
+
+Colouration in preservative.
+
+Top of head, limbs and tail pale-brown; dorsum pale-greyish-brown; a slightly dark-brown stripe radiating from posterior orbital border to occipital region, medially “ W ” shaped; an another short dark-brown stripe at the middle of the head; a short, posteriorly diffused dark-brown stripe starting from posterior corner of the upper eyelids; a faint brown stripe on the loreal region; rostral and mental scale, labial scales dark-greyish-brown with white patch posteriorly; short and irregular shaped, longitudinal dark-brown stripe on dorsal side of neck; six irregular shaped, zig-zagged dark-brown bands on dorsum; irregular shaped, large dark-brown spots on sacrum and tail base; zig-zagged dark-brown bands on anterior part of the tail, posterior half of the tail (regenerated part) with brown speculation; indistinct brown reticulation on dorsal side of the limbs; ventrally head, body and limbs creamy-white with brown speculation; chin scales and scales below infralabials heavily speckled; lamellae, palm and feet heavily speckled with brown; indistinct brown patches on ventral side of the tail.
+
+
+
+Morphological variation.
+
+
+Detailed morphological variations among the collected individuals of
+
+Cyrtodactylus siangensis
+
+are provided in Table S 2. Dorsal dark brown markings in the
+two paratypes
+are variable in the form of irregular zig-zagged bands to reticulation; reticulation on limbs of the
+two paratypes
+distinct than the
+holotype
+; cross bands on tail of WII-ADR 1581 darker posteriorly (Fig.
+9
+).
+
+
+
+
+Comparison.
+
+
+Morphologically
+
+Cyrtodactylus siangensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+is close to
+
+C. cayuensis
+
+, however, phylogenetically it is distinct from the later (Fig.
+2
+; Table S 3), also the
+type
+locality of the new species is separated by Siang River from the
+
+C. cayuensis
+
+localities recorded in this study (Fig.
+3 B
+). Morphological differences with other members of
+
+khasiensis
+
+group is presented in Table
+2
+.
+
+
+
+
+Sequence divergence.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus siangensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+has a high genetic divergence of 11.7–17.0 % from its closely related and the only other species in the clade,
+
+C. cayuensis
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The specific epithet is a toponym derived from the name of the river “ Siang ”. The
+type
+locality of this species lies in the Siang valley of
+Arunachal Pradesh
+.
+
+
+
+
+Suggested common name.
+
+Siang Valley bent-toed gecko.
+
+
+
+Distribution and natural history.
+
+
+
+Cyrtodactylus siangensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+is currently only known from the type locality, Bodak, East Siang District. It appears to be uncommon, and likely a habitat generalist. The
+holotype
+was encountered on a shrub at the edge of Kalek stream (a tributary of Siang River) at a height of approximately one meter above the ground, at 18: 15 hrs. The stream at the time of survey was flowing at a moderately speed, was approximately
+10 m
+in width and contained boulders (sedimentary rock) and fallen logs. The
+two paratypes
+were recorded on a small tree at a height of 2.0 m on the slope of a hill close to the collection site for the
+holotype
+. The type locality is ca.
+300 m
+from Siang River and approximately
+150 m
+from the road connecting Pasighat and Yinkiong.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/D8/00/46/D800469F5A535AD69C71745FB63330DF.xml b/data/D8/00/46/D800469F5A535AD69C71745FB63330DF.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0763db8e89d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/D8/00/46/D800469F5A535AD69C71745FB63330DF.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
+
+
+
+Four new Dolichopoda species from Greece, one Troglophilus new to Greece and new locality records (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alexiou, Sotiris
+0000-0003-1031-3003
+Korinthian Museum of Natural History, Isthmion 201, Korinthos 20100, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bakolitsas, Kostas
+0000-0003-3137-4024
+Laboratory of Natural Sciences 3 rd General Lyceum, 301 31 Agrinion, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Di Russo, Claudio
+0000-0002-1620-9592
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rampini, Mauro
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+103
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e121614
+5AA51752-2447-410B-A249-7B421D573CE4
+
+
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda athosensis
+Alexiou
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1
+,
+2
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+:
+GREECE
+•
+♂
+;
+Macedonia
+, Νomos
+Chalkidikis
+,
+Agion Oros
+peninsula, Mt.
+Athos
+,
+Zographou
+monastery,
+cave Skiti
+;
+
+40 ° 18.488 ' N
+,
+24 ° 9.836 ' E
+
+;
+
+15 Jul. 2017
+
+;
+K. Bakolitsas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+Paratypes
+
+:
+GREECE
+• 5 nymphs, same data as for holotype
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+The new species is related to
+
+D. thasosensis
+Chopard, 1964
+
+, endemic to the island of Thasos (
+Chopard 1964
+). It differs in the less pronounced lateral lobes of the X tergite, the dramatically curved median process of the epiphallus and the subgenital plate, which has broader incision with larger styli.
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+Body pale testaceous, posterior margin of the terga dark. Legs elongated, hind femora unarmed. Fore tibiae with 4 spines on both sides of the ventral side, mid tibiae with 5 spines on both sides of the ventral side and hind tibiae with 18 spines on both sides of the dorsal side.
+
+X tergum (last abdominal tergite) (Fig.
+2 C
+) square, with a shallow section in the middle and with two lateral lobes. Lobes not very pronounced, with rounded apex.
+
+
+
+Subgenital plate (Fig.
+2 A
+) divided by a broad median incision, with triangular lateral lobes ; styli short.
+
+
+Epiphallus sclerotized (Fig.
+2 B
+). Median process of epiphallus with a broad base, strongly curved in lateral view, evenly leading to a rounded tip.
+
+Measurements (length in mm): body 17, pronotum 4, fore femora 16, middle femora 17, hind femora 17.
+
+Female.
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The new species is named after
+Athos
+, a mountain dominating the
+Agion Oros
+peninsula.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Known only from the
+type
+locality. Cave Skiti is located a few meters away from the Monastery of Zographou. The cave is about
+10 m
+long, with the entrance facing south-east. The entrance is small (around 0.5 × 1.0 m), and well hidden by lush vegetation.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/DA/28/FC/DA28FC1C3A005F9894524FE38F39FC0F.xml b/data/DA/28/FC/DA28FC1C3A005F9894524FE38F39FC0F.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8865d6fdd79
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/DA/28/FC/DA28FC1C3A005F9894524FE38F39FC0F.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+
+
+
+Four new Dolichopoda species from Greece, one Troglophilus new to Greece and new locality records (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alexiou, Sotiris
+0000-0003-1031-3003
+Korinthian Museum of Natural History, Isthmion 201, Korinthos 20100, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bakolitsas, Kostas
+0000-0003-3137-4024
+Laboratory of Natural Sciences 3 rd General Lyceum, 301 31 Agrinion, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Di Russo, Claudio
+0000-0002-1620-9592
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rampini, Mauro
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+103
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e121614
+5AA51752-2447-410B-A249-7B421D573CE4
+
+
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda graeca
+Chopard, 1964
+
+
+
+
+
+Material examined.
+
+
+
+GREECE
+•
+2 ♂
+;
+Ipiros
+,
+Nomos Ioanninon
+,
+Ioannina
+,
+Aslan Tzami
+(ʻKatakomvesʼ) ;
+
+17 Oct. 2021
+
+;
+S. Alexiou
+,
+S. Zacharias
+&
+O. Tzortzakaki
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Comment.
+
+
+Anna Petrochilou, the prominent Greek speleologist, was the first to observe and report (
+Petrochilou 1975–1976
+) cave crickets at her inspection of ‘ Katakomves’ which are the caves situated underneath the mosque of Aslan Tzami. The mοsque was built by the Ottoman pasha Aslan in
+1618 in
+the castle of the town of Ioannina and is now operating as the Municipal Museum of Ioannina. After almost half a century, a name can finally be assigned to the population; they belong to
+
+Dolichopoda graeca
+
+, a species known only from the
+type
+locality, the cave of Perama,
+4 km
+from the town of Ioannina (
+Chopard 1964
+;
+Di Russo et al. 2014
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/DA/4A/24/DA4A247D2C9955F28788813AF6E97F17.xml b/data/DA/4A/24/DA4A247D2C9955F28788813AF6E97F17.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..672f36114d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/DA/4A/24/DA4A247D2C9955F28788813AF6E97F17.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
+
+
+
+Four new Dolichopoda species from Greece, one Troglophilus new to Greece and new locality records (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alexiou, Sotiris
+0000-0003-1031-3003
+Korinthian Museum of Natural History, Isthmion 201, Korinthos 20100, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bakolitsas, Kostas
+0000-0003-3137-4024
+Laboratory of Natural Sciences 3 rd General Lyceum, 301 31 Agrinion, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Di Russo, Claudio
+0000-0002-1620-9592
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rampini, Mauro
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+103
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e121614
+5AA51752-2447-410B-A249-7B421D573CE4
+
+
+
+
+
+Dolichopoda karoutsosi
+Alexiou
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1
+,
+4
+,
+6
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+:
+GREECE
+•
+♂
+;
+Sterea Ellas
+,
+Nomos Etolias-Akarnanias
+,
+Aetos
+,
+Agios Nikolaos
+,
+cave Siko
+;
+
+38 ° 43.435 ' N
+,
+21 ° 6.977 ' E
+
+;
+
+344 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+7 Aug. 2017
+
+;
+K. Bakolitsas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+Paratypes
+
+:
+GREECE
+•
+2 ♂
+, 1 nymph, same data as for holotype
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+The new taxon presents one morphological character unique for the genus: the presence of a notch at the median process of the epiphallus (present at both dissected males). The shape of the lateral lobes of X tergum of the males shows resemblance to
+
+D. bakolitsasi
+
+, a species known from a cave a few km away. The elevated ridge at the posterior margin of the concavity of the X tergite and the rather slender median process of epiphallus connects the new species with the species of the south Ionian region, e. g.
+
+D. garparoi
+
+,
+
+D. ithakii
+
+,
+
+D. giachinoi
+
+and
+
+D. patrizii
+
+(Fig.
+4
+).
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+Body pale brownish-yellow, legs elongated, hind femora unarmed. Fore tibiae with 4 spines on both sides of the ventral side, mid tibiae with 5 spines on both sides of the ventral side and hind tibiae with 19 spines on both sides of the dorsal side.
+
+X tergum (last abdominal tergite) (Fig.
+6 A
+) with two lateral lobes, shallowly bilobed at apex. Bilobed apex very unequal, the external side elongated, cylindrical, pointing dorso-posteriorly. The two lobes are separated by a large concavity showing an elevated ridge on the posterior margin.
+
+
+Subgenital plate convex, with a wide median incision that runs for 1 / 3 of the total length; lateral lobes rounded, styli short, inserted at the side of the lateral lobes.
+
+Epiphallus sclerotized, median process rather slender and acute, the last ¼ curved inwards, an obvious notch is present at the beginning of the curve (Fig.
+6 B, C
+).
+
+Measurements (length in mm): pronotum 3.6, fore femora 17, middle femora 18, hind femora 26, body 16.
+
+Female.
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The new species is named after our friend, geologist Panos Karoutsos, a dear companion of the second author who visited the
+type
+locality and many other caves together.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Known only from the
+type
+locality. Siko is a pit fall
+7 m
+deep, with a spacious 8 ×
+7 m
+room at its base, without decoration and with high humidity. The entrance is about 0.5 ×
+1 m
+, facing east and on the floor there are many bones belonging to animals that have fallen from the cave entrance.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/F2/92/08/F29208555F635C0DB1C55BEC367E3C94.xml b/data/F2/92/08/F29208555F635C0DB1C55BEC367E3C94.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3eac3e851aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/F2/92/08/F29208555F635C0DB1C55BEC367E3C94.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+
+
+
+An illustrated catalogue of South American species of Omorgus Erichson, 1847 (Coleoptera, Trogidae, Omorginae) including a neotype designation and taxonomical changes
+
+
+
+Author
+
+da Costa-Silva, Vinícius
+0000-0002-4556-3793
+Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X 20, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa & Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Strümpher, Werner P.
+0000-0002-7047-2666
+Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, PO Box 413, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Barclay, Maxwell V. L.
+0000-0003-4989-2014
+Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW 7 5 BD, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z.
+0000-0001-9697-320X
+Laboratório de Scarabaeoidologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+81
+101
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e126799
+339AB68C-DCB1-435F-B88E-2C42D0A7B05E
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+persuberosus
+(
+Vaurie, 1962
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Trox persuberorus
+
+Vaurie, 1962: 145
+(original description).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Trox
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+persuberosus
+
+
+:
+
+Scholtz 1982: 12
+
+(catalogue).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus persuberosus
+
+
+:
+
+Deloya 2005: 122
+
+(checklist);
+
+Ratcliffe 2015: 189
+
+(checklist from
+Peru
+);
+
+Casari et al. 2024: 629
+
+(image).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Omorgus
+(
+Omorgus
+)
+persuberosus
+
+
+:
+
+Scholtz 1986 a
+: 361
+
+(phylogenetics);
+
+Scholtz 1990: 1411
+
+(redescription);
+
+Zidek 2013: 15
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Zidek 2017: 106
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Smith 2017: 87
+
+(distribution data);
+
+Costa-Silva et al. 2021: 2005
+
+(review of Brazilian species).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type specimens examined.
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+, by original designation
+
+(
+♂
+
+
+MZSP
+
+
+).
+See
+Costa-Silva et al. (2021: 2003)
+for high-quality images of the type specimen.
+Type locality
+: “ Ypiranga,
+São Paulo
+” [
+Brazil
+].
+
+
+
+
+Paratypes
+
+. Forty specimens from several localities in different institutions (see
+Vaurie 1962: 146
+).
+
+
+
+
+Geographic distribution.
+
+
+Argentina
+,
+Bolivia
+,
+Brazil
+,
+Paraguay
+,
+Peru
+, and
+Uruguay
+(
+Vaurie 1962
+;
+Scholtz 1990
+;
+Costa-Silva et al. 2021
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/FE/2D/EE/FE2DEEC326735818B399EBF4EE2ABCCD.xml b/data/FE/2D/EE/FE2DEEC326735818B399EBF4EE2ABCCD.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..407f48a1543
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/FE/2D/EE/FE2DEEC326735818B399EBF4EE2ABCCD.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+
+
+
+Four new Dolichopoda species from Greece, one Troglophilus new to Greece and new locality records (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Alexiou, Sotiris
+0000-0003-1031-3003
+Korinthian Museum of Natural History, Isthmion 201, Korinthos 20100, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bakolitsas, Kostas
+0000-0003-3137-4024
+Laboratory of Natural Sciences 3 rd General Lyceum, 301 31 Agrinion, Greece
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Di Russo, Claudio
+0000-0002-1620-9592
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rampini, Mauro
+Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “ C. Darwin ”, Università di Roma “ La Sapienza ”, Roma, Italy
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Entomology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-07-29
+
+
+74
+
+
+1
+
+
+103
+111
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/contrib.entomol.74.e121614
+5AA51752-2447-410B-A249-7B421D573CE4
+
+
+
+
+
+Τroglophilus
+
+zoiai
+Di Russo, Rampini & Cobolli, 2014
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Material examined.
+
+
+
+GREECE
+-
+
+Sterea Ellas
+
+•
+2 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+;
+Nomos Phthiotidos
+/
+Nomos Phokidos
+,
+Mt. Iti
+,
+cave Agio Pneuma
+;
+
+1260 m
+
+. a. s. l ;
+
+6 Sep. 2015
+
+;
+K. Bakolitsas
+leg. (
+KMNH
+)
+
+•
+
+Nomos Phokidas
+,
+Mt. Parnassos
+,
+cave Baroutospilia
+;
+
+27 Dec. 2014
+
+; obs. & ph.
+Kofinas
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Comment.
+
+
+A species recently described from Mt. Parnassos,
+Central Greece
+, present also at Mt. Vardousia and Mt. Giona (
+Alexiou et al. 2014
+;
+Di Russo et al. 2014
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file