From 58167e25047d362f2d010b376522ef6e37d0f520 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ggserver Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 15:18:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add updates up until 2024-09-06 15:12:30 --- .../BE/987BBE5DBE745B07BAA852DB8B6AECFF.xml | 435 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 435 insertions(+) create mode 100644 data/98/7B/BE/987BBE5DBE745B07BAA852DB8B6AECFF.xml diff --git a/data/98/7B/BE/987BBE5DBE745B07BAA852DB8B6AECFF.xml b/data/98/7B/BE/987BBE5DBE745B07BAA852DB8B6AECFF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..634617c30a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/98/7B/BE/987BBE5DBE745B07BAA852DB8B6AECFF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,435 @@ + + + +A checklist of Iranian Aderidae (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea) + + + +Author + +Nardi, Gianluca +Centro Nazionale Carabinieri Biodiversità “ Bosco Fontana ”, Strada Mantova 29, I- 46045 Marmirolo (MN), Italy. + + + +Author + +Ghahari, Hassan +0000-0001-6781-3776 +hghahari@yahoo.com + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +476 +482 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.6 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.6 +1175-5326 +13628218 +10A50494-3F44-41C9-BB12-226569E28116 + + + + + + + +Phytobaenus amabilis amabilis +R.F. +Sahlberg, 1834 + + + + + + + + + +Phytobaenus amabilis amabilis +R.F. +Sahlberg, 1834 + +: + +Schillhammer 1993: 328 + +; + +Nardi 2007: 27 + +; + +Nardi 2008: 457 + +; + +Yuan +et al +. + + + + +2015: 19; +Jung 2016: 38 +; +Nardi 2020: 629 +. + +Phytobaenus amabilis +Sahlb., 1834 + +: +Schmidl & Bussler 2004: 213 +. + +Phytobaenus amabilis +F. +Sahlberg, 1834 + +: +Alekseev & Bukejs 2010: 168 +. + +Phytobaenus amabilis +R.F. +Sahlberg, 1834 + +: + +Chumak +et al +. 2015: 10 + +; + +Telnov +et al +. 2016: 114 + +; +Laugsand & Staverløkk 2020: 71 +; +Sanchez & Chittaro 2022: 104 +. + +Phytobaenus amabilis amabilis +Sahlberg, 1834 + +: +Zúber 2022: 145 +. + +Phytobaenus amabilis +Sahlberg, 1834 + +: + +Lekoveckaitë +et al +. 2023: 6 + +. + + + + +Material examined. + +East Azarbaijan province +, +Khomarloo +, 2 exx., + +June 2012 + +, +P. Farhadi +leg. + + + +General distribution. +Austria +( +Schillhammer 1993 +), +Byelorussia +, +China +, +Croatia +, +Czech Republic +, +Estonia +, +Finland +, +France +, +Germany +, +Hungary +, +Italy +, +Japan +, +Latvia +, +Lithuania +, +Poland +, +Romania +, +Russia +(Central European Territory, East Siberia, Far East, North European Territory), +Slovakia +, +Sweden +, +Taiwan +, +Ukraine +( +Nardi 2020 +), +Iran +(this study), +Norway +( +Laugsand & Staverløkk 2020 +), +South Korea +( +Jung 2016 +). + + +Notes. +The above record from +Austria +was overlooked by +Nardi (2008 +, +2020 +) and in “Fauna Europaea” ( + +Audisio +et al +. 2015 + +). +Jung (2016) +lists this species as coming from “ +China +(Nei Mongoi)” but, in reality, refers to “NE +China +” ( +Nardi 2008 +, +2020 +). Despite its wide distribution, this species is found only very rarely, and usually in isolated individuals ( +Sanchez & Chittaro 2022 +). The above individuals come from the forests of northwestern +Iran +(near the +Azerbaijan +boundary), where them have been collected on + +Acer hyrcanum + +( +Sapindaceae +). The biology of this species is almost unknown. Adults are collected by sweeping and beating bushes and trees: + +Acer + +, + +Alnus + +, + +Carpinus +, +Corylus + +, + +Crataegus + +, + +Fraxinus + +, + +Hedera + +, + +Populus + +, + +Prunus + +, + +Salix + +, and + +Tilia + +(cf. +Sanchez & Chittaro 2022 +; +Zúber 2022 +). In +Norway +, this species was collected in a forest edge, on small bushes of + +Tilia cordata + +, + +Quercus robur + +and + +Corylus avellana +( +Laugsand & Staverløkk 2020 +) + +; in +Sweden +it seems extinct, but it has been recorded also on timber imported from +Russia +; in +Finland +, it was collected (manually and by window-traps) on + +Populus +sp. + +and + +Betula +sp. + +(cf. +Laugsand & Staverløkk 2020 +); in Baltic +Russia +, it was collected using a pitfall trap in the fork of a living old lime-tree ( + +Tilia +sp. + +), three meters above ground level ( +Alekseev & Bukejs 2010 +); in +Latvia +, it was collected by free-standing flight interception traps, in old + +Populus tremula +-Picea abies + +mixed forests ( + +Telnov +et al +. 2016 + +); in +Lithuania +, it was collected in emergence traps fixed to horizontal trunks of + +Populus tremula + +and + +Betula +sp. + +in the secondary stage of decay ( + +Lekoveckaitë +et al +. 2023 + +); in +Germany + +Phytobaenus amabilis amabilis + +is listed among the relict saproxylic species of primary forests (cf. +Sanchez & Chittaro 2022 +); in southern +Italy +a single specimen, was collected with a Malaise trap equipped with a container half filled with 70% ethanol in a mature beech ( + +Fagus sylvatica + +) ( +Fagaceae +) forest, 110 years old ( +Nardi 2007 +), also in +Ukraine +this species was trapped in a primeval beech forest ( + +Chumak +et al +. 2015 + +), while at +Taiwan +it was collected by sweeping net and also at +UV +light ( + +Yuan +et al +. 2015 + +). The larvae, still unknown, are, very probably, saproxylophagous ( +Schmidl & Bussler 2004 +; +Laugsand & Staverløkk 2020 +; +Sanchez & Chittaro 2022 +), and it seems that the species of fungus colonizing the wood, as well as other abiotic and biotic factors, are more decisive in explaining the presence of this beetle than the species of the tree (cf. +Sanchez & Chittaro 2022 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file