diff --git a/data/37/0C/87/370C87C94A226F67852129F60A59F99D.xml b/data/37/0C/87/370C87C94A226F67852129F60A59F99D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..098fe764ce7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0C/87/370C87C94A226F67852129F60A59F99D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,341 @@ + + + +Systematics and Taxonomy of the Northern Banjo Frog (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Limnodynastes terraereginae) and Allied Taxa + + + +Author + +Parkin, Tom + + + +Author + +Rowley, Jodi J. L. + + + +Author + +Gillard, Grace L. + + + +Author + +Sopniewski, Jarrod + + + +Author + +Shea, Glenn M. + + + +Author + +Donnellan, Stephen C. + +text + + +Ichthyology & Herpetology + + +2024 + +2024-03-22 + + +112 + + +1 + + +76 +105 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/h2023025 + +journal article +10.1643/h2023025 +2766-1520 +13749162 + + + + + + + +Limnodynastes terraereginae +( +Fry, 1915 +) + + + + +Figures 16, 17 + + + +FIG. 10. Illustration of hind foot webbing extent, a useful diagnostic character for identification of the + +Limnodynastes dorsalis + + +group. (A) Well-developed webbing (extends to beyond half-way between the 1 +st +subarticular tubercle and tip of Toe 1), (B) moderate webbing (extends one-quarter to half-way between the 1 +st +subarticular tubercle on Toe 1), (C) vestigial webbing (does not or only slightly extends beyond the 1 +st +subarticular tubercle on the 1 +st + +Toe). Illustration copyright Alana de Laive. + + + +Suggested common name: Superb Banjo Frog + + + + + +Holotype +.— + +AMS +R4525 +(adult female) collected from +Somerset +, +Cape York Peninsula +, +Far North +Queensland +, +Australia +( +10.758S +, +142.588E +) by +Charles Hedley +and +Allan Riverstone McCulloch +in 1907. + + + + +FIG. 11. Examples of typical ventral color pattern, a useful diagnostic trait between members of the eastern + +Limnodynastes dorsalis + +group. (A) + +Limnodynastes terraereginae + +(CYP lineage), (B) + +L. grayi + +(WS lineage), (C) + +L. superciliaris + +(EC lineage), (D) + +L. dumerilii dumerilii + +, +(E) + +L. dumerilii insularis + +, +and (F) + +L. interioris +. + +Specimen registration labels represent 25 mm. + + + +Material examined.— +See Supplementary +Table S1 +(see Data Accessibility) for full list of specimens used in morphometric analyses. + + + +Revised diagnosis.— +Limnodynastes terraereginae + +can be distinguished from all species in the + +L. dorsalis + +group by a combination of: (1) large adult body size ( +SVL +for males +65–66 mm +; females +73–94 mm +), (2) excessively robust build, (3) vestigial-moderate trace of webbing on the hind foot ( +Fig. 10 +), (4) presence of magenta suffusions in the groin, (5) pale, immaculate ventral surface, edged with yellow ( +Fig. 11A +), (6) advertisement call with a moderately high dominant frequency (0.6–1.1 kHz, mean 0.8 kHz), and (7) genetically by 16 apomorphic nucleotide states on the +ND4 +gene (Table 4). + + + +Holotype +measurements (mm).— + +SVL +73.4; FOL 44.5; TIB 27.1; THL 30.2; HW 32.9; IOD 6.5; DFE 11.8; IND 6.4; NS 6.7; EN 6.4; ED 8.5; HDD 14.6; SL 13.0; HL 26.4; UAL 12.7; LAL 17.7; HAL 17.3; AL 32.7; FL 31.1; +IMT +6.0; TEY 3.9; Fin3W 1.9; Toe4W 2.1. + + + + + +Redescription of +holotype +.— + +Habitus excessively stout. Dorsum textured with irregular tubercles, ventral surface smooth. + + + +FIG. 12. Holotype of + +Heliorana grayi +, NHMW + +4695. (A) Left-side profile, (B) hind foot, (C) dorsal profile, (D) ventral profile. Images copyright Alice Schumacher, NHM Vienna. + + + +Head large, broadest at tympanum, wider than long (HW/HL 1.25). Head appears rounded from above and in lateral profile. Nostrils slightly raised, outward-facing and not prominent in profile. Eyes large, bulbous and protruding, pupil round and tympanum indistinct. Arms and legs short and powerfully built, tibial gland prominent, oval-shaped and approximately 57% length of tibia. Four fingers and five toes, all rounded, thick-set and tapering without terminal discs. Webbing on fingers absent and with moderate trace on toes ( +Fig. 10 +), prominent distended finger spatulae on 2 +nd +fingers indicating specimen is female. Subarticular tubercles prominent on fingers and toes, metacarpal tubercles prominent, inner-metatarsal tubercle also prominent, wedge-shaped and longer than the 1 +st +toe. Soles of feet smooth. Numerous raised scattered tubercles present on posterior edge of thighs and around cloaca. + + +Color in preservative.— +Described after more than 115 years in preservative, dorsum base color a fairly uniform creambrown with irregularly scattered large dark brown blotches and spots, tending to become darker and denser posteriorly. Distinct yellow vertebral stripe extending from rostrum to vent. Pattern becomes more dispersed laterally and is replaced by a fairly uniform cream-yellow base which transitions to a slightly lighter and immaculate cream-yellow on the ventrum. Subaural gland cream-yellow, with darker brown banding running through eye. Upper surface of arms cream-yellow with faded mottling. Lower surface of arms and legs plain cream-yellow. + + +Variation.— +A summary of variation in morphometric characters for each sex is presented in +Table 6 +and +Figure 6 +. + + +Color and pattern (in life).— +Ventral surface plain, unpatterned cream to pearl and edged by yellow. Vocal sac dark brown to orange and mottled in breeding males. Distinct magenta patches in inguinal region and legs. Dorsum with light brown base with strong dark brown to black blotching ( +Fig. 17 +). Yellow vertebral stripe can be distinct, broken, faded, or absent. Lateral zone with dark brown base and yellow-orange mottling or stippling. Posterior thigh flash black with scarlet to orange blotching. Soles of feet dark brown with light speckling and lateral edge of foot often with yellow stripe. Shoulder with yellow-orange patch, forearm mottled with gray, brown, white, to pearl fingers and toes. Distinct yellow to orange subaural gland with darker brown to black stripe running from rostrum, through eye and usually fading into the lateral zone. + + +Advertisement call.— +The advertisement call description of + +L. terraereginae + +is based on the calls of five individuals from Cape +York +Peninsula. The advertisement call consists of a single, resonant note. Individuals had a mean dominant frequency of 0.6–1.1 kHz, and a mean fundamental frequency of 0.5–0.6 kHz. On average, advertisement calls had a duration of 0.08– +0.12 s +( +Table 7 +; +Fig. 8 +) + + + + +FIG. 13. Images in life of + +Limnodynastes grayi + +. (A) AMS R.188151, female, Dirty Creek, north coast, NSW. (B) AMS R.188350, female, Tyndale, north coast, NSW. (C) AMS R.185843, male, Yetman, Northern Tablelands, NSW. (D) QM J97851, male, Watsonville, Atherton Tablelands, Qld. (E) QM J97848, male, Hervey Range, Qld. (F) QM J97857, female, Mount Carbine, Qld. + + + + +Distribution.— +Restricted to the eastern coast of the Cape +York +Peninsula Bioregion in far north QLD, from Cooktown in the south to +Somerset +at the tip of Cape +York +, encompassing an area of approximately +36,000 km +2 +. Recorded from Jardine-Pascoe Sandstones, Coen-Yambo Inlier, Laura Lowlands, and Starke Coastal Lowlands subregions. + + +Habitat.— +Occurs in Melaleuca woodlands, ephemeral swamps, littoral monsoon forest, vine thicket, coastal heath, and riparian habitats with clay or sandy substrate. + + +Conservation status.— +AOO and EOO were calculated for this taxon at +204 km +2 +and +59,565 km +2 +, respectively. The estimate of AOO potentially qualifies the taxon for Endangered; however, the EOO estimate does not meet any risk category. There is currently inadequate data available to assess whether populations of this taxon are fragmented, have declined, or have fluctuated severely and so a listing of Least Concern is appropriate until further information becomes available. + + + + +FIG. 14. Holotype of + +Platyplectrum superciliare +, ZFMK + +28331. (A) Left-side profile, (B) hind foot, (C) dorsal profile, (D) ventral profile. Images copyright Morris Flecks, ZFMK, Germany. + + + + +Ecology.— +The peak calling period is from January to March. According to FrogID data, the species is most often recorded calling from streams, creeks, and flooded areas in natural landscapes. Males have been recorded calling in closedcanopy, flooded littoral monsoon forest near Cooktown in +May 2021 +, elevation +12 m +a.s.l. (T. Parkin, pers. obs.). Significant rainfall (. +250 mm +) had fallen in the region over the preceding week associated with tropical cyclone +Niran +. Several males were observed calling from exposed positions beside the water’s edge, air temperature 26.58C. Tadpoles and reproductive biology not recorded. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0C/87/370C87C94A246F6B86F42B6C0C4AF975.xml b/data/37/0C/87/370C87C94A246F6B86F42B6C0C4AF975.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9340eeea4c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0C/87/370C87C94A246F6B86F42B6C0C4AF975.xml @@ -0,0 +1,442 @@ + + + +Systematics and Taxonomy of the Northern Banjo Frog (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Limnodynastes terraereginae) and Allied Taxa + + + +Author + +Parkin, Tom + + + +Author + +Rowley, Jodi J. L. + + + +Author + +Gillard, Grace L. + + + +Author + +Sopniewski, Jarrod + + + +Author + +Shea, Glenn M. + + + +Author + +Donnellan, Stephen C. + +text + + +Ichthyology & Herpetology + + +2024 + +2024-03-22 + + +112 + + +1 + + +76 +105 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/h2023025 + +journal article +10.1643/h2023025 +2766-1520 +13749162 + + + + + + + +Limnodynastes superciliaris +( +Keferstein, 1867 +) + + + + + + + +Figures 14 +, +15 + +Suggested common name: Coastal Banjo Frog + + + + + +Holotype +.— + +ZFMK28331 +(adult male), type locality originally stated as Australien ( +¼ +Australia +). Most likely collected from the environs of Sydney between 1857–1862 by German natural history collector +Bernhard Rudolf Sch +utte € (see +Appendix +1). + + + +Material examined.— +See Supplementary +Table S1 +(see Data Accessibility) for full list of specimens used in morphometric analyses. + + + +Holotype +measurements (mm).— + +SVL +44.9; FOL 27.8; TIB 16.9; THL 16.8; HW 19.7; IOD 4.4; DFE 6.9; IND 4.1; NS 4.3; EN 3.3; ED 5.4; HDD 8.3; SL 7.6; HL 15.9; UAL 7.6; LAL 8.4; HAL 10.3; AL 26.3; FL 20.5; +IMT +3.4; TEY 1.4; Fin3W 0.9; Toe4W 1.2. + + + +Revised diagnosis.— +Limnodynastes superciliaris + +can be diagnosed from all other species in the + +L. dorsalis + +group by the + +combination of: (1) relatively small adult body size ( +SVL +for males +34–60 mm +; females +42–63 mm +), (2) moderately robust build, (3) vestigial webbing trace on the hind foot (i.e., webbing does not extend beyond, or only slightly extends beyond, the first subarticular tubercle on the first toe [ +Fig. 10C +]), (4) pale and immaculate, almost translucent, ventral surface ( +Fig. 11C +), (5) lacks scarlet suffusions in the groin, (6) advertisement call of a high dominant frequency (0.5–1.5 kHz, mean 1.2 kHz) and short duration (0.04– +0.12 s +, mean +0.07 s +), and (7) genetically by 17 apomorphic character states on the +ND4 +gene (Table 4) + +. + + + + + +Redescription of +holotype +.— + +Described from high-resolution images of the preserved specimen after more than 158 years in preservative. Habitus moderately stout and robust. Dorsum and ventral surface smooth. Head large, broadest at tympanum and wider than long. Head appears rounded from above and largely flat in profile, sloping abruptly at the snout. Nostrils are slightly raised and outward-facing. Eyes large and concealed, tympanum indistinct. Arms and legs short and moderately slender, tibial gland prominent, oval-shaped and approximately 60% length of tibia. Four fingers and five toes, all rounded, slender and tapering without terminal discs. Webbing on fingers absent and reduced to a vestigial trace on toes ( +Fig. 10 +), no trace of a distended spatula on 2 +nd +finger, indicating specimen is male. Subarticular tubercles prominent on fingers and toes, metacarpal tubercles prominent, inner-metatarsal tubercle also prominent, wedge-shaped and slightly longer than the first toe. Soles of feet smoothly textured. Many small, raised tubercles of varying sizes scattered on posterior edge of thighs and cloaca. + + +Color in preservative.— +Dorsal surface medium brown with a mosaic of lighter and darker brown, cream or yellow paravertebral lines, blotches, and spots. Distinct light cream-yellow vertebral stripe. Pattern transitions to a complex light cream-yellow and dark brown stippling on lateral surface and then completely pale cream, almost translucent on the ventral surface. Prominent cream subaural gland running from below eye to shoulder, with broad dark brown band running through eye. Upper surface of arms and legs consists of complex pattern of light and dark brown, cream-yellow blotches and spots, tending darkest inside the thigh. Posterior edge of forearm with cream stripe. Lower surface of arms and legs pale cream, almost translucent. Raised tubercles around cloaca and posterior edge of thighs, cream-yellow. Slightly darkened throat pigment indicating the specimen is male. + + + +Table 7. Summary of advertisement call data for members of the + +Limnodynastes dorsalis + +group lineages redescribed herein, expressed as means 6 standard deviation and the range of values for each taxon. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Taxon + +n + +Dominant frequency (kHz) + +Call duration (s) + +Call rate (calls/min) + +Fundamental frequency (kHz) +
CYP lineage5 +0.8 +6 +0.2 (0.6 +– +1.1) + +0.10 +6 +0.014 (0.08 +– +0.12) + +38.15 +6 +25.18 (12.72 +– +72.06) + +0.5 +6 +0 (0.5 +– +0.6) +
WS lineage41 +0.9 +6 +0.2 (0.6 +– +1.3) + +0.09 +6 +0.02 (0.05 +– +0.14) + +31.58 +6 +20.54 (4.74 +– +89.67) + +0.6 +6 +0.1 (0.4 +– +0.7) +
EC lineage19 +1.2 +6 +0.3 (0.5 +– +1.5) + +0.07 +6 +0.03 (0.04 +– +0.12) + +23.69 +6 +17.25 (5.36 +– +75.52) + +0.6 +6 +0.1 (0.5 +– +0.8) +
+ + + +FIG. 8. Comparison of the male advertisement calls of (A) WS lineage—Rockhampton, QLD (FrogID 312613), (B) EC lineage—Harrington, NSW (AMS R.188164), (C) CYP lineage—Finch Bay, Cooktown, QLD (QM J97862), (D) + +Limnodynastes dumerilii dumerilii + +—Tenterfield Creek, NSW (AMS R.188096), and (E) + +L. interioris + +—Narrandera, NSW (FrogID 276467). Audiospectrograms and oscillograms were produced in Raven Pro 1.6 with a fast-Fourier transformation of 512 points, and 50% overlap. + + + +Variation.— +Summary of variation in morphometric characters for each sex is presented in +Table 6 +and +Figure 5 +. + + +Color and pattern variation (in life).— +Variation in color is described from images of genotyped specimens taken in life. Ventral surface plain, unpatterned cream anteriorly to translucent pearl posteriorly. Vocal sac often darker yellowbrown and mottled in males. Distinct scarlet patches absent from inguinal region and legs. Dorsal surface dark to light brown with rose-gold or crimson tinge, often with longitudinally aligned paravertebral stripes blotches or mottling. Red-light brown vertebral stripe present and distinct, broken, faded, or absent. Lateral zone light brown fading to cream-white ventrally with transition often marked by a zone of gray, black, and yellow, or cream spots and mottling. Posterior thigh flash black with gray, cream, yellow or orange mottling or blotching. Soles of feet light to dark brown with gray or cream speckling. Lateral edge of foot with yellow to brown cream stripe. Shoulders with yellow, cream, brown, or gold patch, forearm darker gray or brown and usually mottled. Light brown, cream, or gold subaural gland with dark gray to black stripe above extending from rostrum through eye to edge of subaural gland. + + +Advertisement call.— +The advertisement call description of + +L. superciliaris + +is based on the calls of 19 individuals from the Sydney Basin bioregion. The advertisement call consists of a single, resonant note. Individuals had a mean dominant frequency of 0.5–1.5 kHz, and a mean fundamental frequency of 0.5–0.8 kHz. On average, advertisement calls had a duration of 0.04– +0.12 s +( +Table 7 +; +Fig. 8 +). + + + + +Distribution.— +Most restricted distribution of the three species (approximately +26,000 km +2 +). Its range is centered entirely within the Sydney Basin and North Coast bioregions, including the Wollemi, Cumberland, Pittwater, Sydney-Cataract, Wyong, Hunter, Karuah-Manning, and Macleay-Hasting sub-bioregions. Mostly occurs in low-lying areas; however, has been recorded up to +600 m +a.s.l. in the Blue Mountains National Park. Southerly distribution limits for this species include Stanwell Tops/Dharawal National Park. Also found throughout the Hawkesbury and Cumberland Plains region, extending to the central, mid-northern, and northern NSW coastline to at least South West Rocks and historically the Nambucca River. Does not occur on the southern coast of NSW as reported previously (i.e., +Parker, 1940 +; +Martin, 1972 +; +Anstis, 2017 +). Specimens from Jervis Bay have been confirmed by our genetic analyses to represent + +L. dumerilii insularis + +. + + +Habitat.— + +Associated with sandy heathlands, coastal acid swamplands (wallum), and dry open sclerophyll forest. Appears to prefer remnant habitats, uncommonly recorded in urban or agricultural areas. Occurs within a variety of threatened vegetation communities, including the +Castlereagh +Scribbly Gum and Agnes Banks Woodlands of the Sydney Basin Bioregion (Endangered); Temperate +Highland +Peat Swamps on Sandstone +(Endangered); River-flat eucalypt forest on coastal floodplains of southern +New South Wales +and eastern +Victoria +(Critically Endangered); +Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub +of the +Sydney Region +(Endangered); Coastal Upland Swamps in the Sydney Basin Bioregion (Endangered); Coastal Swamp Oak ( + +Casuarina glauca + +) Forest of +New South Wales +and +South East +Queensland +ecological community (Endangered) + +. + + + +FIG. 9. Boxplot comparison of variation in the advertisement call traits between the + +Limnodynastes dorsalis + +group lineages redescribed herein, depicting variation in (A) dominant frequency (kHz), (B) call duration (s), (C) fundamental frequency (kHz), and (D) call rate (calls/min). Small dots represent outliers. + + + +Conservation status.— +AOO and EOO were calculated at +1,928 km +2 +and +37,819 km +2 +, respectively. The estimates for AOO potentially qualify the taxon as Vulnerable. There is lack of evidence of population fragmentation, decline, or severe fluctuation to assess + +L. superciliaris + +for an extinction risk category and so a listing of Least Concern is applicable. However, concern for the species conservation status is warranted given its distribution is centered largely within threatened and fragmented vegetation communities of the Sydney Basin, one of Australia’s most urbanized regions. + + + + +Ecology.— +Males congregate and call around static-water wetlands, wallums, swamps, and dams where they call while floating in water or secreted beneath vegetation at the water’s edge. According to FrogID data, the species is most often recorded calling from streams, creeks, and dams. The peak calling period is from September to November, with some reduced calling activity from December to March. The majority of FrogID recordings of + +L. superciliaris + +have been recorded in natural and rural areas, with few recordings from suburban and urban landscapes. Stomach contents of museum specimens included a wide variety of invertebrate prey, including spiders, centipedes, beetles, earthworms, and ants (predominantly + +Myrmecia +spp. + +). The species burrows into loose, sandy soils during unfavorable weather conditions and appears capable of remaining in aestivation for months at a time. For tadpole identification and development, see + +L. dumerilii grayi + +section in +Anstis (2017) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0C/87/370C87C94A396F6D854E2E150B1DFB8D.xml b/data/37/0C/87/370C87C94A396F6D854E2E150B1DFB8D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6fd840b9148 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0C/87/370C87C94A396F6D854E2E150B1DFB8D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1093 @@ + + + +Systematics and Taxonomy of the Northern Banjo Frog (Anura: Limnodynastidae: Limnodynastes terraereginae) and Allied Taxa + + + +Author + +Parkin, Tom + + + +Author + +Rowley, Jodi J. L. + + + +Author + +Gillard, Grace L. + + + +Author + +Sopniewski, Jarrod + + + +Author + +Shea, Glenn M. + + + +Author + +Donnellan, Stephen C. + +text + + +Ichthyology & Herpetology + + +2024 + +2024-03-22 + + +112 + + +1 + + +76 +105 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1643/h2023025 + +journal article +10.1643/h2023025 +2766-1520 +13749162 + + + + + + + +Limnodynastes grayi +( +Steindachner,1867 +) + + + + + + + +Figures 12 +, +13 + +Suggested common name: Scarlet-sided Banjo Frog + + + + + +Holotype +.— + +NHMW 4695 +(adult male) collected in the vicinity of Rockhampton, +Queensland +(previously stated as Neu-S ud-Wales € +¼ +NSW in the original description). Presumably collected by +German +natural history collector +Eduard Dämel +in 1866 (see Appendix 1). + + + + +Material examined.— +Heliorana grayi + +type +examined from high-resolution images. For full list of specimens examined in morphometric analyses see Supplementary +Table S1 +(see Data Accessibility). + + + +Revised diagnosis.— +Limnodynastes grayi + +is diagnosed from all species in the + +L. dorsalis + +group by a combination of: (1) medium-large adult body size ( +SVL +for males +47–78 mm +; females +55–75 mm +), (2) robust build, (3) vestigial-moderate webbing trace on the feet ( +Fig. 10 +), (4) the presence of scarlet suffusions in the groin, (5) pale and immaculate ventral surface ( +Fig. 11B +), (6) advertisement call with a moderately high dominant frequency (0.6–1.3 kHz, mean 0.9 kHz), and (7) genetically by five apomorphic nucleotide states on the +ND4 +gene (Table 4). + + + + + +Redescription of the +holotype +.— + +We redescribe the +holotype +based on high-resolution images of the preserved specimen after more than 155 years in preservative. Habitus stout and robust. Dorsum and ventral surface smooth. Head large, broadest at tympanum and wider than long. Head appears rounded from above and largely flat in profile, sloping more steeply at snout. Nostrils slightly raised and forward-facing. Tympanum indistinct. Subaural gland distinct and extending from below eye to above shoulder. Eyes large and concealed. Arms and legs relatively short and powerfully built, tibial gland prominent, oval-shaped and approximately 56% the length of tibia. Four fingers and five toes, all rounded, and tapering without terminal discs. Webbing on fingers absent but moderately developed on toes ( +Fig. 10 +). Subarticular tubercles prominent on fingers and toes, metacarpal tubercles prominent, inner-metatarsal tubercle also prominent, wedge-shaped and approximately the same length as the first toe. Soles of feet smoothly textured. + + +Color in preservative.— +Uniform dark brown dorsally without patterning, transitioning to stippled cream-yellow laterally and completely plain cream-yellow ventrally. Prominent cream-yellow subaural gland and pale raised spots around cloaca and posterior edge of thighs. + + +Variation.— +A summary of variation in morphometric characters for each sex is presented in +Table 6 +and +Figure 6 +. + + +Color and pattern variation (in life).— +Variation in color is described from images of genotyped specimens taken in life. Ventral surface plain, unpatterned translucent pearl to cream, sometimes edged with gray, cream, yellow, or orange. Vocal sac often darker and mottled in males. Dorsal surface plain brown to gray sometimes with dark or light blotches and mottling. Orange-yellow vertebral stripe may be distinct, broken, faded, or absent. Lateral zone gray with yellow, orange, scarlet, black, or white mottling, reticulations, or stippling. Scarlet patches or mottling usually present in the inguinal region, upper thigh, and medial tibia. Posterior thigh flash black with gray-scarlet mottling or blotching becoming lighter toward anterior edge of thigh. Soles of feet brown-gray and with black, white, gray speckling and yellow stripe on lateral edge of foot. Shoulders with yellow-orange patch and remaining arm gray and mottled with black or white. Hands lighter white, cream, or gray. Prominent yellow-cream subaural gland with darker gray, black, or brown stripe running from rostrum, through eye to edge of subaural gland. + + + +FIG. 6. + + +Comparison of morphological measurements between adult specimens of the + +Limnodynastes dorsalis + +group lineages redescribed herein. + + + +Advertisement calls.— + +The advertisement call description of + +L. grayi + +is based on the calls of 41 individuals sampled throughout the species’ distribution, including the +holotype +locality (Rockhampton, +QLD +). The advertisement + +call consists of a single, resonant note. Individuals had a mean dominant frequency of 0.6–1.3 kHz, and a mean fundamental frequency of 0.4–0.7 kHz. On average, advertisement calls had a duration of 0.05– +0.14 s +( +Table 7 +; +Fig. 8 +). + + + + +Distribution.— +Widely distributed across an area spanning approximately +550,000 km +2 +from central western NSW to northern QLD. In the southernmost extent of its range, + +L. grayi + +is absent largely from higher altitude areas of the Great Dividing Range ( +GDR +), occurring mostly on the slopes and plains to the west, as far south as Tomingley, Central West NSW. East of the +GDR +, + +L. grayi + +extends as far south as Coffs Harbour on the north coast. In QLD, + +L. grayi + +occurs throughout south-eastern coastal regions including several islands (i.e., Fraser, Moreton, Stradbroke, and Whitsunday Islands), extending continuously along the coast up to Bowen. In north QLD, + +L. grayi + +primarily occurs in upland areas such as the Atherton Tablelands, Hervey and Paluma Ranges, with the northernmost extent of its range appearing to be the western edge of the Carbine Uplands. The range of + +L. grayi + +also extends into inland QLD as far as Mungalalla in the south, and Carnarvon National Park, Torrens Creek, up to Blackbraes and Undara National Parks in the north. + + + +Table 6. Summary of metric variation (mean 6 SD, and range in mm) for 23 morphometric traits between members of the + +Limnodynastes dorsalis + +group lineages redescribed herein. Sample size in parentheses beside sex (m or f). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+WS lineage + +EC lineage + +CYP lineage +
+Trait + +f (30) + +m (63) + +f (31) + +m (53) + +f (3) + +m (2) +
SVL +66.8 +6 +5.9 55.3 74.9 + +61.7 +6 +7.4 47.1 78.0 + +52.8 +6 +4.9 42.1 63.2 + +46.4 +6 +5.6 33.7 59.6 + +81.1 +6 +11.5 73.4 94.4 + +65.4 +6 +0.8 64.8 66.0 +
AL +30.1 +6 +2.9 24.4 34.4 + +28.2 +6 +3.0 20.2 32.8 + +24.9 +6 +2.5 19.8 29.5 + +21.9 +6 +3.2 15.9 30.3 + +36.2 +6 +6.2 32.6 43.3 + +32.0 +6 +1.1 31.2 32.8 +
DFE +10.2 +6 +1.0 8.6 11.8 + +9.4 +6 +1.2 7.0 11.7 + +7.5 +6 +0.8 6.2 9.9 + +6.9 +6 +1.0 4.6 9.2 + +12.1 +6 +1.9 10.4 14.2 + +10.8 +6 +0.6 10.3 11.2 +
ED +7.6 +6 +0.7 6.0 8.9 + +7.2 +6 +0.7 5.4 8.5 + +6.2 +6 +0.6 4.9 7.5 + +5.7 +6 +0.7 3.8 7.2 + +8.1 +6 +0.4 7.7 8.5 + +7.5 +6 +0.1 7.5 7.6 +
EN +4.9 +6 +0.5 4.0 5.8 + +4.7 +6 +0.6 3.2 5.9 + +4.2 +6 +0.5 3.4 5.3 + +3.7 +6 +0.5 2.6 4.9 + +6.7 +6 +1.1 5.7 7.9 + +6.2 +6 +0.4 6.0 6.5 +
Fin3W +1.5 +6 +0.3 1.0 2.2 + +1.4 +6 +0.3 0.9 1.9 + +1.2 +6 +0.2 0.7 1.7 + +1.0 +6 +0.2 0.6 1.5 + +2.0 +6 +0.2 1.9 2.3 + +1.5 +6 +0.0 1.5 1.5 +
FL +29.9 +6 +3.1 23.3 35.6 + +28.7 +6 +3.1 19.1 36.0 + +25.7 +6 +3.3 19.5 35.6 + +22.7 +6 +3.2 16.8 30.7 + +35.0 +6 +7.4 30.5 43.6 + +32.0 +6 +1.2 31.1 32.8 +
FOL +41.2 +6 +3.8 34.1 47.8 + +39.6 +6 +3.9 27.9 46.1 + +35.1 +6 +3.5 28.4 42.2 + +31.4 +6 +4.3 23.1 42.8 + +48.9 +6 +8.2 43.9 58.3 + +43.2 +6 +1.4 42.2 44.2 +
HAL +16.6 +6 +1.7 13.2 19.2 + +16.0 +6 +1.8 11.6 19.1 + +13.8 +6 +1.5 11.4 16.7 + +12.3 +6 +1.7 9.4 16.4 + +19.4 +6 +3.4 17.3 23.3 + +17.5 +6 +0.6 17.1 17.9 +
HDD +10.8 +6 +1.5 8.6 13.8 + +10.5 +6 +1.6 7.0 13.9 + +9.3 +6 +1.1 7.1 11.4 + +8.2 +6 +1.1 5.5 10.5 + +15.9 +6 +2.3 14.5 18.5 + +13.3 +6 +0.8 12.7 13.8 +
HL +24.8 +6 +2.0 20.4 27.9 + +23.5 +6 +2.7 18.4 28.9 + +19.8 +6 +1.7 16.1 23.1 + +17.8 +6 +2.3 13.0 25.2 + +32.1 +6 +7.4 26.4 40.4 + +27.9 +6 +1.4 26.9 29.0 +
HW +28.6 +6 +3.2 22.4 34.6 + +26.9 +6 +3.3 19.2 33.6 + +22.5 +6 +1.9 18.5 26.6 + +19.7 +6 +2.5 14.4 26.2 + +37.7 +6 +6.3 32.9 44.8 + +31.5 +6 +1.0 30.8 32.2 +
IMT +5.6 +6 +0.9 3.5 7.1 + +5.5 +6 +0.8 3.1 7.0 + +4.1 +6 +0.6 3.1 5.5 + +3.7 +6 +0.6 2.5 5.7 + +6.8 +6 +0.8 6.0 7.6 + +6.2 +6 +0.0 6.2 6.2 +
IND +5.5 +6 +0.7 3.9 6.4 + +5.3 +6 +0.7 4.0 6.9 + +4.4 +6 +0.43 3.5 5.0 + +4.0 +6 +0.6 3.2 5.8 + +7.0 +6 +1.1 6.3 8.2 + +6.1 +6 +0.3 5.9 6.3 +
IOD +6.3 +6 +0.5 5.5 7.5 + +5.8 +6 +0.8 4.0 7.4 + +4.9 +6 +0.6 3.6 6.2 + +4.5 +6 +0.5 3.2 5.4 + +7.3 +6 +0.8 6.5 8.0 + +6.5 +6 +0.5 6.1 6.8 +
LAL +15.5 +6 +1.6 12.9 18.6 + +14.6 +6 +1.9 10.3 18.7 + +12.8 +6 +1.3 10.2 15.4 + +11.0 +6 +1.6 7.3 15.1 + +19.9 +6 +3.5 17.7 23.9 + +17.5 +6 +0.9 16.8 18.2 +
NS +5.6 +6 +0.5 4.5 6.8 + +5.3 +6 +0.7 3.8 7.2 + +4.9 +6 +0.6 3.7 6.0 + +4.3 +6 +0.6 3.0 6.0 + +6.9 +6 +0.9 6.1 7.9 + +6.8 +6 +0.3 6.6 7.0 +
SL +11.0 +6 +0.8 8.9 12.2 + +10.3 +6 +1.1 78.0 12.1 + +9.2 +6 +1.0 7.1 11.2 + +8.12 +6 +1.2 5.6 10.8 + +13.7 +6 +2.1 12.1 16.1 + +12.8 +6 +1.0 12.1 13.5 +
TEY +3.6 +6 +0.6 2.5 4.6 + +3.5 +6 +0.5 2.4 4.4 + +2.9 +6 +0.5 2.0 4.2 + +2.6 +6 +0.5 1.4 3.7 + +4.1 +6 +0.8 3.5 5.0 + +5.2 +6 +2.1 3.7 6.7 +
THL +28.6 +6 +4.5 21.5 44.0 + +27.0 +6 +3.5 19.1 35.8 + +22.9 +6 +2.3 19.5 27.3 + +19.9 +6 +3.1 13.4 26.7 + +35.4 +6 +9.1 30.0 45.9 + +30.5 +6 +1.5 29.4 31.6 +
TIB +26.4 +6 +2.8 21.4 31.0 + +24.9 +6 +3.1 17.2 34.8 + +21.6 +6 +2.5 18.1 30.7 + +19.0 +6 +2.7 14.0 26.4 + +32.7 +6 +8.3 27.1 42.2 + +28.8 +6 +1.3 27.9 29.7 +
Toe4W +1.6 +6 +0.3 1.1 2.3 + +1.6 +6 +0.3 1.1 2.3 + +1.4 +6 +0.2 0.9 1.8 + +1.2 +6 +0.2 0.7 1.7 + +2.2 +6 +0.4 1.9 2.6 + +1.8 +6 +0.0 1.8 1.8 +
UAL +11.0 +6 +1.7 7.3 14.9 + +11.0 +6 +1.6 7.3 15.3 + +10.1 +6 +1.5 7.9 13.1 + +9.1 +6 +1.5 6.4 13.1 + +14.8 +6 +4.5 11.7 19.9 + +12.3 +6 +0.5 11.9 12.7 +
+ + +Habitat.— +Occurs in a variety of habitats including sclerophyll and open woodland, Melaleuca wetlands, brigalow, coastal heathland, urban, and agricultural areas. Usually found in association with sandy and sometimes granitic substrates, basalt plains, sandstone hills, and plains. + + +Conservation status.— +Given its substantially widespread distribution (. +550,000 km +2 +) and lack of evidence for population fragmentation or decline, + +L. grayi + +likely qualifies for the listing of Least Concern under the IUCN Red List Criteria ( +IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee, 2022 +). + + + + +FIG. 7. Linear discriminant function analysis (DFA) scatterplot of adult morphometric characters for specimens of the + +Limnodynastes dorsalis + +group lineages redescribed herein. + + + + +Ecology.— +Breeding occurs in static or slow-flowing aquatic habitats such as ponds, dams, road-side ditches, swamps, and wallums ( +Anstis, 2017 +; T. Parkin, pers. obs.). Males typically call from concealed positions amongst vegetation or floating in water. According to FrogID data, the species is most often recorded calling from dams, ponds, and flooded areas, particularly within rural and natural landscapes. The male calling period is from November to February, with some calling activity in September, October, and March. Tadpole development detailed by +Davies (1992) +and +Anstis (2017) +. Tadpoles are highly acid-tolerant, withstanding a range from circumneutral–pH 3.0 ( +Hines and Meyer, 2011 +; +Hird et al., 2022 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/5E/E1/36/5EE136E8815E594095C2EE616FB70863.xml b/data/5E/E1/36/5EE136E8815E594095C2EE616FB70863.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ed22fdb6a1a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/5E/E1/36/5EE136E8815E594095C2EE616FB70863.xml @@ -0,0 +1,723 @@ + + + +Top mountain areas of subtropical southern Brazil sheltering four new small-ranged catfishes (Siluriformes, Trichomycteridae): relationships and taxonomy + + + +Author + +Costa, Wilson J. E. M. +0000-0002-0428-638X +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Feltrin, Caio R. M. +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Mattos, José Leonardo O. +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Katz, Axel M. +0000-0002-2933-7163 +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + +text + + +Evolutionary Systematics + + +2024 + +2024-09-11 + + +8 + + +2 + + +199 +218 + + + +journal article +10.3897/evolsyst.8.126393 +973DECB5-340A-41CE-9AEE-B968664489B2 + + + + + +Cambeva galactica +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 2 +, +3 +, +4 A – C +, +Table 3 + + + + +Type material. + + + + + +Holotype + +. + +Brazil +• +1 ex. +, +76.9 mm +SL; +Santa Catarina State +: +Rio Negrinho Municipality +: +village of Volta Grande +: +stream tributary of Rio Preto, itself a tributary of Rio Negro, Rio Iguaçu drainage, Rio Paraná basin +; + +26 ° 33 ' 04 " S +, +49 ° 40 ' 14 " W + +; about + +970 m +asl + +; + +29 Mar. 2023 + +; +C. R. M. Feltrin +, leg.; + +UFRJ +14064 + +. + + + + + + +Paratypes + +. + +Brazil +• +4 ex. +, +18.7–40.6 mm +SL; same data as for holotype; + +UFRJ +13516 + + +. • + +3 ex. +(C & S), +40.5–64.9 mm +SL; same data as for holotype; + +UFRJ +14065 + + +. • + +2 ex. +(DNA), +16.5–38.8 mm +SL; same data as for holotype; + +UFRJ +13517 + + +. • + +5 ex. +, 28.8–108.0 mm SL; same locality and collector as holotype; + +28 Jun. 2023 + +; + +UFRJ +13847 + + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. + + + +Cambeva galactica + +is distinguished from all congeners by a unique colour pattern in adult specimens consisting of flank and dorsum with longitudinal rows of interconnected yellowish white vermiculate diffuse marks (vs. never a similar colour pattern), and the presence of a distinctive projection on the anterior portion of the medial margin of the sesamoid supraorbital, connected by thin ligamentous tissue to a dorsal projection on the articulatory shell of the autopalatine for the lateral ethmoid (Fig. +4 A +; vs. never a similar process connected to that articulation). + +Cambeva galactica + +is also distinguished from all other species of the + +Cambeva + +beta-clade, except + +Cambeva flavopicta +Costa, Feltrin & Katz, 2020 + +, + +Cambeva naipi +( +Wosiacki & Garavello, 2004 +) + +, + +Cambeva taroba +( +Wosiacki & Garavello, 2004 +) + +, and + +Cambeva tourensis +Costa, Feltrin & Katz, 2023 + +by having six pectoral-fin rays (vs. five, seven, or eight). + +Cambeva galactica + +is distinguished from + +C. flavopicta + +and + +C. tourense + +by having well-developed pelvic fins (vs. absent); from + +C. naipi + +and + +C. taroba + +by having more interopercular odontodes 29–32 vs. 11 or +12 in + +C. naipi + +and +17–21 in + +C. taroba + +) and more jaw teeth (41–43 on the premaxilla and 39–46 on the dentary, vs. 25–34 and 23–32, respectively); from + +C. naipi + +by having 14 or 15 ribs (vs. 12 or 13), fewer opercular odontodes (eight or nine vs 12 or 13), and from + +C. taroba + +by having a minute pectoral-fin filament, its length less than 5 % of the pectoral-fin length (vs. about 20 %), fewer procurrent caudal-fin rays (18 or 19 dorsal and 12 or 13 ventral, vs. 26 or 27 and 21–23, respectively), more vertebrae (39 or 40 vs 36). Molecular diagnosis: 34 nucleotide substitutions, nine of them unique among taxa analysed *, and five unique for the + +Cambeva + +beta-clade **: +COX 1 +103 (T → C) **, +COX 1 +103 (G → A), +COX 1 +117 (A → T) *, +COX 1 +243 (A → G) *, +COX 1 +309 (G → A), +COX 1 +312 (C → A), +COX 1 +321 (C → A), +COX 1 +330 (C → A) *, +COX 1 +483 (T → C), +COX 1 +540 (A → G), +COX 1 +547 (C → T), +COX 1 +684 (A → C) *, +CYTB +195 (T → C), +CYTB +219 (T → C), +CYTB +282 (C → T) **, +CYTB +283 (T → C), +CYTB +339 (C → T), +COX 1 +342 (C → T), +CYTB +394 (C → T), +CYTB +399 (T → C) **, +CYTB +495 (G → A), +CYTB +528 (A → G), +CYTB +585 (T → C) **, +CYTB +711 (C → T) *, +CYTB +715 (G → A) *, +CYTB +735 (C → T) *, +CYTB +771 (C → T) *, +CYTB +822 (A → G), +CYTB +849 (T → C), +CYTB +891 (T → C) *, +CYTB +900 (T → C) *, +CYTB +909 (A → G), +CYTB +994 (A → C), +CYTB +1032 (C → T) **. +COX 1 +p-distances among congeners of the + +Cambeva + +beta-clade ranging from 2.9 ( + +Cambeva atrobrunnea +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +and + +Cambeva ventropapillata +Costa, Feltrin & Katz, 2022 + +) and 4.7. + + + + +Description. + + +Morphometric data appear in Table +3 +. + + + + + + +Morphometric data of + +Cambeva galactica +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
-HolotypeParatypes (n = 6)
Standard length (SL)76.940.1–108.0
+Percentage of standard length +
Body depth16.415.1–16.2
Caudal peduncle depth11.810.5–12.7
Body width11.69.8–12.6
Caudal peduncle width4.53.4–5.5
Pre-dorsal length65.362.6–65.8
Pre-pelvic length60.058.5–62.4
Dorsal-fin base length10.911.1–12.2
Anal-fin base length9.38.4–10.0
Caudal-fin length17.615.4–18.3
Pectoral-fin length13.311.6–14.4
Pelvic-fin length9.98.7–9.4
Head length22.520.6–23.1
+Percentage of head length +
Head depth44.342.2–52.0
Head width80.478.5–90.5
Snout length42.135.1–43.6
Interorbital width24.425.5–26.9
Preorbital length11.99.7–11.7
Eye diameter9.76.9–11.9
+ + + +Head morphology +. + +Barbels moderate in length. Nasal barbel reaching area just anterior to opercle, maxillary barbel reaching between interopercular patch of odontodes and pectoral-fin base, and rictal barbel reaching posterior portion of interopercular patch of odontodes. Jaw teeth pointed, irregularly arranged. Premaxillary teeth 41–43, dentary teeth 39–46. Opercular and interopercular odontodes pointed, about straight. Opercular odontodes 8 or 9; interopercular odontodes 29–32. Anterior infraorbital sensory canal present. + + + +Fin morphology +. + +Dorsal and anal fins subtriangular, margins slightly convex. Total dorsal-fin rays 11 or 12 (ii – iii + II – III + 6–7), total anal-fin rays 9 or 10 (ii – iii + II + 5). Anal-fin origin at vertical just posterior to middle dorsal-fin base, at base of 3 +rd +or 4 +th +branched dorsal-fin ray. Pectoral fin sub-triangular in dorsal view, margins slightly convex, first pectoral-fin ray slightly longer than second ray, weakly extending beyond fin membrane forming minute filament. Total pectoral-fin rays 6 (I + 5). Pelvic fin rounded, its tip reaching vertical through middle portion of dorsal-fin base. Total pelvic-fin rays 5 (I + 4). Caudal fin subtruncate, corners rounded. Total principal caudal-fin rays 13 (I + 11 + I), total dorsal procurrent rays 18 or 19 (xvii – xviii + I), total ventral procurrent rays 12 or 13 (xi – xii + I). + + + +Osteology +(Fig. +4 A – C +). + +Mesethmoid narrow anteriorly, with lateral expansion in area just anterior to lateral ethmoid, anterior mesethmoid margin slightly concave, with minute anterior projection on its middle portion. Mesethmoid cornu extremity pointed. Lateral ethmoid with small lateral projection immediately posterior to articular facet for autopalatine. Anterodorsal portion of lateral ethmoid widened, projecting laterally. Lacrimal thin, elliptical. Sesamoid supraorbital gently curved, its longitudinal length about two times and half longer than lacrimal longitudinal length, its largest width about equal to lacrimal width. Medial margin of anterior portion of sesamoid supraorbital with distinctive projection, connected by thin ligamentous tissue to dorsal projection on articulatory shell of autopalatine for lateral ethmoid. Premaxilla long, laterally narrowing. Maxilla slender, with rudimentary posterior process, slightly curved, its length about four fifths of premaxilla. Autopalatine sub-trapezoidal in dorsal view, medial margin sinuous, lateral margin weakly concave. Autopalatine postero-lateral process triangular, short, its length about half autopalatine length. + +Metapterygoid trapezoid, deeper than long, large, its surface about twice quadrate lateral surface. Quadrate with deep anterior constriction at dorsal process base. Hyomandibula long, anterior outgrowth horizontal length longer than largest horizontal metapterygoid length. Posterior margin of hyomandibula with small projection just above articular facet for opercle. Dorsal margin of hyomandibula outgrowth concave. Opercle elongate, longer than interopercle. Opercular odontode patch very slender, its depth about one third hyomandibula articular facet length. Dorsal process of opercle short, subtriangular, its extremity rounded. Opercular articular facet for hyomandibula with dorsal, rounded laminar projection. Articular facet for preopercle rounded, well-developed. Interopercle relatively long, interopercular odontode patch length longer than hyomandibula outgrowth length. Preopercle slender, with minute ventral projection. + +Parurohyal thin, lateral process narrow, slightly curved posteriorly, with rounded extremity. Parurohyal head with prominent anterolateral paired process. Parurohyal middle foramen small, rounded. Parurohyal posterior process moderate in length, about three fourths of distance between anterior margin of parurohyal and anterior insertion of posterior process. Branchiostegal rays 8. Vertebrae 39 or 40. Ribs 14 or 15. Dorsal-fin origin at vertical through centrum of 21 +st +or 22 +nd +vertebra; anal-fin origin at vertical through centrum of 21 +st +or 22 +nd +vertebra. Two dorsal and single ventral hypural plate. + + + +Colouration in alcohol +. + +In adult specimens (Fig. +2 +), flank, dorsum, and head side pale brown; three longitudinal rows of interconnected yellowish white, diffuse, vermiculate marks: row on dorsum, with marks forming reticulate pattern along pre-dorsal midline; one row on dorsal portion of flank, comprising minute marks; and row on ventral portion of flank. Venter and ventral surface of head yellowish white. Barbels pale brown. Fins greyish hyaline. In juvenile specimens between about 25 and +50 mm +SL (Fig. +3 +), flank and dorsum pale yellow, with broad dark brown stripe along flank longitudinal midline and dark brown reticulate pattern on dorsum, and dorsal and ventral portions of flank. In juvenile specimens smaller than +20 mm +SL, flank and dorsum pale yellow, with narrow black stripe along flank longitudinal midline and longitudinal series of black blotches between dorsum and flank, and longitudinal series of small black dots on ventral portion of flank. + + + + + + + +Cambeva galactica +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +, holotype, + +UFRJ +14064 + +, 76.9 mm SL. +A. +Lateral view; +B. +Dorsal view; +C. +Ventral view. + + + + + + + + +Cambeva galactica +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +, paratype, + +UFRJ +13847 + +, 33.4 mm SL. +A. +Lateral view; +B. +Dorsal view; +C. +Ventral view. + + + + + + + +Osteological structures of: +A – C. + +Cambeva galactica +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +; +D – F. + +Cambeva atrobrunnea +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +; +G – I. + +Cambeva luteoreticulata +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +, and +J – L. + +Cambeva rotundipinna +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +A, D, G, J. +Mesethmoidal region and adjacent structures, left and middle portions, dorsal view; +B, E, H, K. +Left jaw suspensorium and opercular series, lateral view. +C, F, I, L. +Parurohyal, ventral view. Abbreviation of structure indicated by arrow: aes, anteromedial expansion of sesamoid supraorbital. Larger stippling represents cartilaginous areas. + + + + + +Distribution. + + + +Cambeva galactica + +is only known from its type locality in the upper Rio Preto drainage, which is a tributary of the +Rio Negro +, Rio Iguaçu drainage, Rio +Paraná +basin, at about +970 m +asl (Fig. +5 +). + + + + + + +Geographical distribution of four new species of + +Cambeva + +from the Rio Iguaçu drainage, Serra do Espigão, southern Brazil: 1. + +Cambeva galactica +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +; 2. + +Cambeva atrobrunnea +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +; 3. + +Cambeva luteoreticulata +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +; 4. + +Cambeva rotundipinna +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. + + + + + +Etymology. + + +The name + +galactica + +is derived from the Ancient Greek word galaktikós meaning milky, an allusion to the rows of yellowish white diffuse vermiculate marks present in the flank of the new species, reminiscent of the Milky Way. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/75/40/6B/75406B8769645F46BF04B2B82DDE9268.xml b/data/75/40/6B/75406B8769645F46BF04B2B82DDE9268.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f70b4bc7fe1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/75/40/6B/75406B8769645F46BF04B2B82DDE9268.xml @@ -0,0 +1,799 @@ + + + +Top mountain areas of subtropical southern Brazil sheltering four new small-ranged catfishes (Siluriformes, Trichomycteridae): relationships and taxonomy + + + +Author + +Costa, Wilson J. E. M. +0000-0002-0428-638X +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Feltrin, Caio R. M. +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Mattos, José Leonardo O. +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Katz, Axel M. +0000-0002-2933-7163 +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + +text + + +Evolutionary Systematics + + +2024 + +2024-09-11 + + +8 + + +2 + + +199 +218 + + + +journal article +10.3897/evolsyst.8.126393 +973DECB5-340A-41CE-9AEE-B968664489B2 + + + + + +Cambeva rotundipinna +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 4 J – L +, +10 +, +11 +, +Table 6 + + + + +Type material. + + + + + +Holotype + +. + +Brazil +• 78.0 mm SL; Brazil: +Santa Catarina State +: +Matos Costa Municipality +: +Paca road +: +Rio da Paca, tributary of Rio Jangada, Rio Iguaçu drainage, Rio Paraná basin +; + +26 ° 25 ' 02 " S +, +51 ° 15 ' 42 " W + +; about + +1000 m +asl + +; + +1 Apr. 2023 + +; +C. R. M. Feltrin +and +L. Sebben +, leg.; + +UFRJ +14070 + +. + + + + + + +Paratypes + +. + +All from +Santa Catarina State +: +Matos Costa Municipality +: +Paca road +: +Rio da Paca, tributary of Rio Jangada, Rio Iguaçu drainage, Rio Paraná basin +. +Brazil +• +2 ex. +, +44.4–76.3 mm +SL; same data as holotype; + +UFRJ +13820 + + +. • + +3 ex. +(C & S), +30.3–55.2 mm +SL; collected with holotype; + +UFRJ +14071 + + +. • + +1 ex. +, +30.8 mm +SL; collected with holotype; + +UFRJ +13559 + + +. • + +1 ex. +(DNA), +27.8 mm +SL; + +26 ° 25 ' 06 " S +, +51 ° 16 ' 30 " W + +; about + +1000 m +asl + +; + +30 Jun. 2023 + +; +C. R. M. Feltrin +, leg.; + +UFRJ +13560 + + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. + + + +Cambeva rotundipinna + +differs from all other congeners of the + +Cambeva + +beta-clade, except + +C. luteoreticulata + +, by having a relatively short and rounded caudal fin in specimens above about +60 mm +SL (Fig. +10 A +; vs. subtruncate, truncate, emarginate or forked). + +Cambeva rotundipinna + +differs from + +C. luteoreticulata + +by having fewer procurrent caudal-fin rays (15–17 dorsal and 10 or 11 ventral, vs. 21 or 22 and 15 or 16, respectively), jaw teeth irregularly arranged (vs. arranged in three rows), more opercular odontodes (14–17 vs. nine or ten), longer nasal barbel in specimens above +60 mm +SL, reaching area between orbit and opercular patch of odontodes (vs. reaching area anterior to orbit), and a colour pattern of juveniles, in which the flank is light brownish yellow with small black dots irregularly arranged (vs. pale yellow with large, irregularly shaped dark brown to black blotches, more concentrated on its dorsal portion). + +Cambeva rotundipinna + +also differs from + +C. atrobrunnea + +, another species from western RISE, by having more odontodes (14–17 opercular and 30–34 interopercular, vs. 12 and 20–22, respectively) and a different juvenile colour pattern, comprising black dots irregularly arranged on the flank (Fig. +11 A +; vs. black dots arranged in irregular longitudinal rows, coalesced to form stripe on the anterior flank midline, Fig. +7 A +). + +Cambeva rotundipinna + +also differs from both + +C. atrobrunnea + +and + +C. luteoreticulata + +by having a broader autopalatine, with its largest width about equal to its length (Fig. +4 J +, vs. narrower, Fig. +4 D, G +) and a shorter posterior process of the parurohyal, its length about one third of the distance between the anterior margin of the parurohyal and the anterior insertion of the posterior process (Fig. +4 L +, vs. longer, Fig. +4 F, I +). + +Cambeva rotundipinna + +is also distinguished from all other species of + +Cambeva + +endemic to the Rio Iguaçu drainage by the following combination of character states: seven pectoral-fin rays (vs. eight in + +C. castroi + +, + +C. melanoptera + +, + +C. crassicaudata + +, + +C. stawiarski + +; and six in + +C. galactica + +, + +C. naipi + +, and + +C. taroba + +); absence of the anterior infraorbital (vs. presence in + +C. galactica + +, + +C. naipi + +, + +C. papillifera + +, + +C. plumbea + +, and + +C. taroba + +); posterior margin of the caudal fin convex (vs. about straight in + +C. crassicaudata + +, + +C. davisi + +, + +C. galactica + +, + +C. melanoptera + +, + +C. papillifera + +, + +C. piraquara + +, + +C. plumbea + +, + +C. igobi + +; straight to slightly concave in + +C. stawiarski + +; bilobed in + +C. crassicaudata + +; and emarginate in + +C. cauim + +); absence of hypertrophied papillae on the ventral surface of the head (vs. presence in + +C. papillifera + +); absence of pectoral-fin filament (vs. presence a well-developed filament in + +C. taroba + +and a rudimentary filament in + +C. davisi + +and + +C. piraquara + +); nine or 10 opercular odontodes (vs. broad, with 17 or +18 in + +C. mboycy + +; 15 or +16 in + +C. davisi + +; seven or eight in + +C. taroba + +); 30–34 interopercular odontodes (vs. 12 or +13 in + +C. naipi + +; +17–21 in + +C. mboycy + +and + +C. taroba + +); 15–17 dorsal procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. +25–29 in + +C. crassicaudata + +, + +C. igobi + +, + +C. mboycy + +, + +C. stawiarski + +, and + +C. taroba + +; 30 or +31 in + +C. cauim + +); 10 or 11 ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. 15 or +16 in + +C. naipi + +, +21–23 in + +C. taroba + +); dorsal-fin origin at a vertical through the centrum of the 21 +st +or 22 +nd +vertebra (vs. 19 +th +or 20 +th +in + +C. crassicaudata + +, + +C. mboycy + +, and + +C. stawiarski + +); jaw teeth pointed, irregularly arranged (vs. incisiform and arranged in rows in + +C. davisi + +); and 39 vertebrae ( +36 in + +C. taroba + +). Molecular diagnosis: 10 nucleotide substitutions, two of them unique among taxa analysed *: +COX 1 +105 (G → A), +COX 1 +252 (G → A), +COX 1 +360 (G → A), +COX 1 +462 (T → G) *, +COX 1 +534 (G → A), +CYTB +69 (A → G) *, +CYTB +195 (T → C), +CYTB +219 (T → C), +CYTB +483 (A → G), +CYTB +637 (G → A). +COX 1 +p-distances among congeners of the + +Cambeva + +beta-clade ranging from 1.2 ( + +Cambeva atrobrunnea +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +, + +Cambeva cubataonis +(Bizerril, 1994) + +, and + +Cambeva ventropapillata +Costa, Feltrin & Katz, 2022 + +) and 4.7. + + + + + + + +Cambeva rotundipinna +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +, holotype, + +UFRJ +14070 + +, 78.0 mm SL. +A. +Lateral view; +B. +Dorsal view; +C. +Ventral view. + + + + + + + + +Cambeva rotundipinna +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +, paratype, + +UFRJ +13820 + +, 44.0 mm SL. +A. +Lateral view; +B. +Dorsal view; +C. +Ventral view. + + + + + +Description. + + +Morphometric data appear in Table +6 +. + + + + + + +Morphometric data of + +Cambeva rotundipinna +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
-HolotypeParatypes (n = 3)
Standard length (SL)78.044.4–76.3
+Percentage of standard length +
Body depth15.114.5–15.6
Caudal peduncle depth12.111.9–13.0
Body width12.012.2–13.3
Caudal peduncle width4.13.7–4.9
Pre-dorsal length64.665.3–69.7
Pre-pelvic length57.259.9–60.9
Dorsal-fin base length11.511.4–12.2
Anal-fin base length8.28.2–9.1
Caudal-fin length14.014.8–16.6
Pectoral-fin length9.49.6–12.6
Pelvic-fin length8.28.4–9.4
Head length19.921.6–25.9
+Percentage of head length +
Head depth50.740.7–52.7
Head width85.368.6–80.1
Snout length39.635.6–41.6
Interorbital width22.218.7–23.7
Preorbital length13.89.5–13.3
Eye diameter8.37.9–10.2
+ + + +Head morphology +. + +Barbels moderate in length. Nasal barbel reaching area just posterior to orbit, maxillary and rictal barbels reaching middle of interopercular patch of odontodes. Jaw teeth with pointed to rounded extremities, irregularly arranged. Premaxillary teeth 37 or 38, dentary teeth 32–35 Opercular and interopercular odontodes pointed, about straight. Opercular odontodes 14–17, interopercular odontodes 30–34. + + + +Fin morphology +. + +Fins rounded. Total dorsal-fin rays 11 (ii + II + 7), total anal-fin rays 9 (ii + II + 5). Anal-fin origin at vertical through posterior portion of dorsal-fin base, at base of 6 +th +branched dorsal-fin ray in specimens above about +50 mm +SL, at vertical through posterior middle of dorsal-fin base, at base of 4 +th +branched dorsal-fin ray in smaller specimens. Pectoral fin rounded in dorsal view, first pectoral-fin ray about equal in length to second ray, not forming terminal filament. Total pectoral-fin rays 7 (I + 6). Pelvic fin rounded, its tip reaching vertical through middle of dorsal-fin base. Total pelvic-fin rays 5 (I + 4). Caudal fin subtruncate, corners rounded. Total principal caudal-fin rays 13 (I + 11 + I), total dorsal procurrent rays 15–17 (xiv – xvi + I), total ventral procurrent rays 10 or 11 (ix – x + I). + + + +Osteology +(Fig. +4 J – L +). + +Mesethmoid broad anteriorly, with small lateral expansion in area just anterior to lateral ethmoid. Anterior mesethmoid margin convex, mesethmoid cornu broad, subtriangular, slightly curved posteriorly, abruptly narrowing at its extremity. Lateral ethmoid with small lateral projection immediately posterior to articular facet for autopalatine. Lacrimal thin, elliptical. Sesamoid supraorbital length about two times longer than lacrimal, without lateral expansions, its width about equal to lacrimal width. Premaxilla long, laterally narrowing, slightly curved. Maxilla slender, slightly curved, its length about four fifths of premaxilla, posterior process rudimentary. Autopalatine sub-trapezoidal in dorsal view, broad, its largest width about equal to its length, medial margin deeply sinuous with pronounced expansion on posterior margin, lateral margin weakly concave. Autopalatine postero-lateral process triangular, short, its length about half autopalatine length. + +Metapterygoid sub-trapezoidal, longer than deep, relatively large, its surface greater than quadrate lateral surface. Area anterior to articulation between metapterygoid and quadrate with small laminar overlapped expansions of both bones. Quadrate with deep anterior constriction at dorsal process base. Hyomandibula long, anterior outgrowth horizontal length slightly longer than largest horizontal metapterygoid length. Dorsal margin of hyomandibula outgrowth concave. Opercle elongate, longer than interopercle. Opercular odontode patch moderately slender, its depth about two thirds of hyomandibula articular facet length. Dorsal process of opercle short, subtriangular, its extremity pointed. Opercular articular facet for hyomandibula with dorsal, small, rounded laminar projection, articular facet for preopercle rudimentary. Interopercle moderate in length, interopercular odontode patch length about equal hyomandibula outgrowth length. Preopercle slender, with minute ventral projection. + +Parurohyal robust, lateral process sub-rectangular, slightly curved posteriorly, with truncate extremity. Parurohyal head with prominent anterolateral paired process. Parurohyal middle foramen relatively large, oval. Parurohyal posterior process short, about one third of distance between anterior margin of parurohyal and anterior insertion of posterior process. Branchiostegal rays 8 or 9. Vertebrae 39. Ribs 14 or 15. Dorsal-fin origin at vertical through centrum of 21 +st +or 22 +nd +vertebra; anal-fin origin at vertical through centrum of 25 +th +or 26 +th +vertebra. Two dorsal and single ventral hypural plate. + + + +Colouration in alcohol +. + +In adult specimens, above about +50 mm +SL (Fig. +10 +), flank, dorsum and head side light brownish yellow, with great concentration of small dark brown to black dots. Venter and ventral surface of head pale yellow, with minute dark brown dots in area just anterior to pelvic fin and on branchiostegal region. Nasal and maxillary barbels brown, rictal barbel brownish white. Fins hyaline; dark chromatophores scattered over all fins, except pelvic fin. In juvenile specimens about +40 mm +SL or less (Fig. +11 +), flank, dorsum and head side light brownish yellow with small black dots irregularly arranged. + + + + +Distribution. + + + +Cambeva rotundipinna + +is known from two close localities in the Rio da Paca, a tributary of the Rio Jangada, Rio Iguaçu drainage, Rio +Paraná +basin, at about +1000 m +asl (Fig. +5 +). + + + + +Etymology. + +From the Latin rotundus (rounded) and pinna (fin or wing), an allusion to the rounded fins of this new species. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/77/5C/7A/775C7A7B826B5A9389684BD29B1F3821.xml b/data/77/5C/7A/775C7A7B826B5A9389684BD29B1F3821.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..35c7008db44 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/77/5C/7A/775C7A7B826B5A9389684BD29B1F3821.xml @@ -0,0 +1,780 @@ + + + +Top mountain areas of subtropical southern Brazil sheltering four new small-ranged catfishes (Siluriformes, Trichomycteridae): relationships and taxonomy + + + +Author + +Costa, Wilson J. E. M. +0000-0002-0428-638X +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Feltrin, Caio R. M. +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Mattos, José Leonardo O. +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Katz, Axel M. +0000-0002-2933-7163 +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + +text + + +Evolutionary Systematics + + +2024 + +2024-09-11 + + +8 + + +2 + + +199 +218 + + + +journal article +10.3897/evolsyst.8.126393 +973DECB5-340A-41CE-9AEE-B968664489B2 + + + + + +Cambeva luteoreticulata +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 4 G – I +, +8 +, +9 +, +Table 5 + + + + +Type material. + + + + + +Holotype + +. + +Brazil +• +81.6 mm +SL; +Santa Catarina State +: +Matos Costa Municipality +: +village of Colônia Cerne: stream tributary of Rio Liso, itself a tributary of Rio Pintado, Rio Iguaçu drainage, Rio Paraná basin +; + +26 ° 24 ' 25 " S +, +51 ° 00 ' 45 " W + +; about + +1,015 m +asl + +; + +1 Apr. 2023 + +; +C. R. M. Feltrin +and +L. Sebben +, leg.; + +UFRJ +14068 + +. + + + + + + +Paratypes + +. + +Brazil +• +7 ex. +25.2–70.8 mm +SL; same data as holotype; + +UFRJ +13562 + + +. • + +3 ex. +(DNA), +22.7–42.6 mm +SL; same data as holotype; + +UFRJ +13563 + + +. • + +15 ex. +, +27.6–77.2 mm +SL; same locality and collectors as holotype; + +1 Jul. 2023 + +; + +UFRJ +13828 + + +. • + +4 ex. +33.7–75.9 mm +SL; same locality and collectors as holotype; + +1 Jul. 2023 + +; +CICCAA +08268 + +. • + +4 ex. +(C & S), +38.2–65.9 mm +SL; same locality and collectors as holotype; + +1 Jul. 2023 + +; + +UFRJ +14069 + + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. + + + +Cambeva luteoreticulata + +differs from all other congeners by its unique rounded, stapula-shaped caudal fin in specimens above about +40 mm +SL (Fig. +8 A +). + +Cambeva luteoreticulata + +is also distinguished from all other congeners of the + +Cambeva + +beta-clade, except + +Cambeva chrysornata +Costa, Feltrin, Mattos, Dalcin, Abilhoa & Katz, 2023 + +and + +C. papillifera + +, by having short barbels, with the nasal barbel not reaching the orbit in specimens above +60 mm +SL and maxillary and rictal barbels not reaching the interopercular patch of odontodes. + +Cambeva luteoreticulata + +also differs from + +C. chrysornata + +and + +C. papillifera + +by the absence of the anterior segment of the infraorbital series (vs. presence), from + +C. chrysornata + +by having more procurrent caudal-fin rays (21 or 22 dorsal and 15 or 16 ventral, vs. 16 or 17 and 11 or 12, respectively) and fewer opercular odontodes (10–12 vs. 18), and from + +C. papillifera + +by the absence of hypertrophied papillae on the head surface (vs. presence) and narrow nasal barbel (vs. broad laminar, ribbon-shaped). + +Cambeva luteoreticulata + +is also distinguished from all other congeners by a unique pattern of ontogenetic colouration change consisting of flank pale yellow with irregularly shaped and arranged, dark brown to black blotches in specimens below about +40 mm +SL (Fig. +9 A +), becoming dark brown, with small, irregularly shaped pale yellow marks forming reticulate pattern in larger specimens (Fig. +8 A +). + +Cambeva luteoreticulata + +also differs from all the remaining congeners from the Rio Iguaçu drainage by the following combination of character states: seven pectoral-fin rays (vs. eight in + +C. castroi + +, + +C. melanoptera + +, + +C. crassicaudata + +, + +C. stawiarski + +; and six in + +C. galactica + +, + +C. naipi + +, and + +C. taroba + +); absence of the anterior infraorbital (vs. presence in + +C. galactica + +, + +C. naipi + +, + +C. plumbea + +, and + +C. taroba + +); posterior margin of the caudal fin convex (vs. about straight in + +C. crassicaudata + +, + +C. davisi + +, + +C. galactica + +, + +C. melanoptera + +, + +C. papillifera + +, + +C. piraquara + +, + +C. plumbea + +, + +C. igobi + +; straight to slightly concave in + +C. stawiarski + +; bilobed in + +C. crassicaudata + +; and emarginate in + +Cambeva cauim + +); absence of pectoral-fin filament (vs. presence a well-developed filament in + +C. taroba + +and a rudimentary filament in + +C. davisi + +and + +C. piraquara + +); nine or 10 opercular odontodes (vs. broad, with 17 or +18 in + +C. mboycy + +; 15 or +16 in + +C. davisi + +; seven or eight in + +C. taroba + +); 29–32 interopercular odontodes (vs. 12 or +13 in + +C. naipi + +; +17–21 in + +C. mboycy + +and + +C. taroba + +); 25 dorsal procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. +15–17 in + +C. castroi + +and + +C. melanoptera + +; 18 or +19 in + +C. naipi + +;; 30 or +31 in + +C. cauim + +); 15 or 16 ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. +21–23 in + +C. taroba + +); dorsal-fin origin at a vertical through the centrum of the 21 +st +or 22 +nd +vertebra (vs. 19 +th +or 20 +th +in + +C. crassicaudata + +, + +C. mboycy + +, and + +C. stawiarski + +); larger jaw teeth incisiform, teeth arranged in rows (vs. pointed to slight rounded, irregularly arranged in all species, except + +C. davisi + +); and 38–40 vertebrae ( +36 in + +C. taroba + +). Molecular diagnosis: 17 nucleotide substitutions, five of them unique among taxa analysed * and one unique for the + +Cambeva + +beta-clade **: +COX 1 +252 (A → G), +COX 1 +564 (A → C) *, +COX 1 +648 (C → T) *, +COX 1 +678 (A → G), +CYTB +123 (C → T), +CYTB +206 (G → C) *, +CYTB +294 (C → T) *, +CYTB +474 (G → A), +CYTB +495 (G → A), +CYTB +636 (C → T) *, +CYTB +675 (T → C), +CYTB +696 (A → G), +CYTB +696 (A → G), +CYTB +879 (A → G) **, +CYTB +988 (G → A), +CYTB +996 (A → G), +CYTB +1038 (C → T). +COX 1 +p-distances among congeners of the + +Cambeva + +beta-clade ranging from 1.5 ( + +Cambeva atrobrunnea +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +and + +Cambeva rotundipinna +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +) and 4.3. + + + + + + + +Cambeva luteoreticulata +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +, holotype, + +UFRJ +14068 + +, 81.6 mm SL. +A. +Lateral view; +B. +Dorsal view; +C. +Ventral view. + + + + + + + + +Cambeva luteoreticulata +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +, paratype, + +UFRJ +13562 + +, 33.1 mm SL. +A. +Lateral view; +B. +Dorsal view; +C. +Ventral view. + + + + + +Description. + + +Morphometric data appear in Table +5 +. + + + + + + +Morphometric data of + +Cambeva luteoreticulata +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
-HolotypeParatypes (n = 10)
Standard length (SL)81.644.4–77.2
+Percentage of standard length +
Body depth13.613.3–16.0
Caudal peduncle depth12.711.8–13.8
Body width10.110.3–12.8
Caudal peduncle width4.13.3–5.4
Pre-dorsal length67.961.0–67.8
Pre-pelvic length61.359.3–65.2
Dorsal-fin base length11.010.6–12.3
Anal-fin base length8.67.8–9.5
Caudal-fin length13.111.5–16.1
Pectoral-fin length9.68.1–12.7
Pelvic-fin length7.25.8–8.9
Head length21.621.4–23.8
+Percentage of head length +
Head depth45.042.6–51.7
Head width80.378.1–84.1
Snout length40.337.9–42.4
Interorbital width21.218.7–24.6
Preorbital length13.79.8–14.1
Eye diameter8.28.6–12.2
+ + + +Head morphology +. + +Barbels short. Nasal barbel reaching area anterior to orbit in specimens above +60 mm +SL, between orbit and area just posterior to it in smaller specimens, and maxillary and rictal barbels reaching area just anterior to interopercular patch of odontodes. Jaw teeth variable in shape, smaller teeth slightly pointed, larger teeth incisiform with slightly rounded tip, arranged in three series. Premaxillary outer row with 14 or 15 teeth, middle row with 16 or 17 teeth, and inner row with 18 teeth; total premaxillary teeth 49. Dentary outer row with 10 or 11 teeth, middle row with 14 or 15 teeth, and inner row with 17–20 teeth; total dentary teeth 42–45. Opercular and interopercular odontodes pointed, about straight. Opercular odontodes 10–12; interopercular odontodes 29–33. + + + +Fin morphology +. + +Dorsal and anal fins subtriangular, distal margin slightly convex. Total dorsal-fin rays 11 (ii + II + 7), total anal-fin rays 9 (ii + II + 5). Anal-fin origin at vertical through posterior portion of dorsal-fin base, at base of 5 +th +branched dorsal-fin ray. Pectoral fin rounded in dorsal view, first pectoral-fin ray shorter than second ray, not forming terminal filament. Total pectoral-fin rays 7 (I + 6). Pelvic fin rounded, its tip reaching vertical through dorsal-fin origin. Total pelvic-fin rays 5 (I + 4). Caudal fin short, rounded, forming spatula-shaped tail in specimens above about +40 mm +SL. Total principal caudal-fin rays 13 (I + 11 + I), total dorsal procurrent rays 21 or 22 (xx-xxi + I), total ventral procurrent rays 15 or 16 (xiv – xv + I). + + + +Osteology +(Fig. +4 G – I +). + +Mesethmoid distinctively broader anteriorly, with lateral expansion in area just anterior to lateral ethmoid, anterior mesethmoid margin about straight to slightly convex. Mesethmoid cornu extremity rounded. Lateral ethmoid with small lateral projection immediately posterior to articular facet for autopalatine. Lacrimal thin, elliptical. Sesamoid supraorbital about two times and half longer than lacrimal, without lateral expansions, its width about equal to lacrimal width. Premaxilla long, laterally narrowing, slightly curved. Maxilla slender, without posterior process, slightly curved, its length about four fifths of premaxilla. Autopalatine sub-trapezoidal in dorsal view, medial margin sinuous, lateral margin weakly concave. Autopalatine postero-lateral process triangular, short, its length about half autopalatine length. + +Metapterygoid sub-rectangular, deeper than long, relatively large, its surface greater than quadrate lateral surface. Quadrate with deep anterior constriction at dorsal process base. Hyomandibula long, anterior outgrowth horizontal length slightly longer than largest horizontal metapterygoid length; dorsal margin of hyomandibula outgrowth straight anteriorly, with pronounced U-shaped concavity posteriorly. Opercle elongate, longer than interopercle. Opercular odontode patch slender, its depth about half hyomandibula articular facet length. Dorsal process of opercle short, subtriangular, its extremity rounded. Opercular articular facet for hyomandibula with dorsal, broad, rounded laminar projection, articular facet for preopercle rudimentary. Interopercle moderate in length, interopercular odontode patch length about equal hyomandibula outgrowth length. Preopercle slender, with minute ventral projection. + +Parurohyal robust, lateral process subtriangular, slightly curved posteriorly, with pointed tip. Parurohyal head with prominent anterolateral paired process. Parurohyal middle foramen relatively large, oval. Parurohyal posterior process moderate in length, about three fifths of distance between anterior margin of parurohyal and anterior insertion of posterior process. Branchiostegal rays 9 or 10. Vertebrae 38–40. Ribs 14–16. Dorsal-fin origin at vertical through centrum of 21 +st +or 22 +nd +vertebra; anal-fin origin at vertical through centrum of 25 +th +or 26 +th +vertebra. Two dorsal and single ventral hypural plate. + + + +Colouration in alcohol +. + +In adult specimens (Fig. +8 A +), flank, dorsum and head side dark brown, with small, irregularly shaped, irregularly arranged, pale yellow marks forming reticulate pattern. Nasal and maxillary barbels brown, rictal barbel grey. Venter and ventral surface of head yellowish white. Fins pale grey with black spots on basal region, dark brown dots in middle region. In juvenile specimens below about +40 mm +SL (Fig. +9 A +), flank, dorsum and head side pale yellow with large dark brown to black blotches, more concentrated and sometimes forming longitudinal stripes in area between dorsum and flank. + + + + +Distribution. + + + +Cambeva luteoreticulata + +is known from a single locality in a stream tributary of the Rio Liso, Rio Iguaçu drainage, Rio +Paraná +basin, at about +1,015 m +asl (Fig. +5 +). + + + + +Etymology. + +From the Latin luteus (saffron yellow) and reticulata (reticulated), in reference to the flank colour pattern of adult specimens. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/E2/63/D9/E263D96D7DC95618A258F0EE34C194EE.xml b/data/E2/63/D9/E263D96D7DC95618A258F0EE34C194EE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3ac48b12868 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/E2/63/D9/E263D96D7DC95618A258F0EE34C194EE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,808 @@ + + + +Top mountain areas of subtropical southern Brazil sheltering four new small-ranged catfishes (Siluriformes, Trichomycteridae): relationships and taxonomy + + + +Author + +Costa, Wilson J. E. M. +0000-0002-0428-638X +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Feltrin, Caio R. M. +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Mattos, José Leonardo O. +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Katz, Axel M. +0000-0002-2933-7163 +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + +text + + +Evolutionary Systematics + + +2024 + +2024-09-11 + + +8 + + +2 + + +199 +218 + + + +journal article +10.3897/evolsyst.8.126393 +973DECB5-340A-41CE-9AEE-B968664489B2 + + + + + +Cambeva atrobrunnea +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 4 D – F +, +6 +, +7 +, +Table 4 + + + + +Type material. + + + + + +Holotype + +. + +Brazil +• +70.1 mm +SL; +Santa Catarina State +: +Timbó Grande Municipality +: +stream tributary of Rio Timbó, Rio Iguaçu drainage, Rio Paraná basin +; + +26 ° 34 ' 41 " S +, +50 ° 40 ' 28 " W + +; about + +970 m +asl + +; + +29 Jun. 2023 + +; +C. R. M. Feltrin +, leg; + +UFRJ +14066 + +. + + + + + + +Paratypes + +. + +Brazil +• +7 ex. +, +26.6–70.1 mm +SL; same data as holotype; + +UFRJ +13821 + + +. • + +2 ex. +(C & S), +27.4–44.2 mm +SL; same data as holotype; + +UFRJ +14067 + + +. • + +2 ex. +, +29.9–46.8 mm +SL. same locality and collector as holotype; + +31 Mar. 2023 + +; + +UFRJ +13553 + + +. • + +3 ex. +(DNA), +27.4–44.2 mm +SL; same locality and collector as holotype; + +31 Mar. 2023 + +; + +UFRJ +13554 + + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. + + + +Cambeva atrobrunnea + +is distinguished from all other congeners by having the two posterior-most dorsal and ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays segmented (vs. only the posterior-most ray segmented). + +Cambeva atrobrunnea + +is also distinguished from the two other species of western RISE, + +Cambeva luteoreticulata +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +and + +Cambeva rotundipinna +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +, by having subtruncate caudal fin (vs. rounded), fewer interopercular odontodes (20–22 vs. 29–34), and specimens below about +40 mm +SL having flank light grey with small black dots that are arranged in irregular rows, coalesced on the anterior portion of the longitudinal midline to form a stripe (Fig. +7 A +; vs. pale yellow with large, irregularly shaped dark brown to black blotches, sometimes forming longitudinal stripes in the area between dorsum and flank in + +C. luteoreticulata +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +, and light brownish yellow with small black dots irregularly arranged in + +C. rotundipinna +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +(see descriptions below); from + +C. luteoreticulata +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +by specimens above +40 mm +SL having the nasal barbel reaching area just anterior to opercle (vs. reaching area anterior to orbit), fewer ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays (13 or 14 vs. 15 or 16), and jaw teeth irregularly arranged (vs. arranged in three rows); and from + +C. rotundipinna +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +by having more procurrent caudal-fin rays (21 dorsal and 13 or 14 ventral, vs. 15–17 and 10 or 11, respectively), and more opercular odontodes (12 vs. eight or nine). + +Cambeva atrobrunnea + +is also distinguished from all the remaining congeners from the Rio Iguaçu drainage by the following combination of character states: seven pectoral-fin rays (vs. eight in + +Cambeva castroi +( + +de +Pinna +, 1992 + +) + +, + +Cambeva melanoptera +Costa, Abilhoa, Dalcin & Katz, 2022 + +, + +Cambeva crassicaudata +(Wosiacki & de +Pinna +, 2008) + +, + +Cambeva stawiarski +(Miranda Ribeiro, 1968) + +, and six in + +C. galactica + +, + +C. naipi + +, and + +C. taroba + +); absence of the anterior infraorbital (vs. presence in + +C. galactica + +, + +C. naipi + +, + +Cambeva papillifera +( +Wosiacki & Garavello, 2004 +) + +, + +Cambeva plumbea +( +Wosiacki & Garavello, 2004 +) + +, and + +C. taroba + +); posterior margin of the caudal fin slightly convex (vs. about straight in + +C. crassicaudata + +, + +C. davisi + +, + +C. galactica + +, + +C. melanoptera + +, + +C. papillifera + +, + +Cambeva piraquara +dos Reis, Wosiacki, Ferrer, Donin & da Graça, 2022 + +, + +C. plumbea + +, + +C. igobi +(Wosiacki & de +Pinna +, 2008) + +; straight to slightly concave in + +C. stawiarski + +; bilobed in + +C. crassicaudata + +; and emarginate in + +Cambeva cauim +dos Reis, Ferrer & Graça, 2021 + +); absence of hypertrophied papillae on the ventral surface of the head (vs. presence in + +C. papillifera + +); absence of pectoral-fin filament (vs. presence a well-developed filament in + +C. taroba + +and a rudimentary filament in + +C. davisi + +, + +C. galactica + +, and + +C. piraquara + +); 12 opercular odontodes (vs. broad, with 17 or +18 in + +Cambeva mboycy +( +Wosiacki & Garavello, 2004 +) + +; 15 or +16 in + +C. davisi + +; seven or eight in + +C. taroba + +); 20–22 interopercular odontodes (vs. 12 or +13 in + +C. naipi + +); 21 dorsal procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. +15–17 in + +C. castroi + +and + +C. melanoptera + +; 18 or +19 in + +C. naipi + +; +25–29 in + +C. crassicaudata + +, + +C. igobi + +, + +C. mboycy + +, + +C. stawiarski + +, and + +C. taroba + +; 30 or +31 in + +C. cauim + +); 13 or 14 ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. +21 – 23 in + +C. taroba + +); dorsal-fin origin at a vertical through the centrum of the 21 +st +or 22 +nd +vertebra (vs. 19 +th +or 20 +th +in + +C. crassicaudata + +, + +C. mboycy + +, and + +C. stawiarski + +); jaw teeth pointed, irregularly arranged (vs. incisiform and arranged in rows in + +C. davisi + +); and 39 or 40 vertebrae ( +36 in + +C. taroba + +). Molecular diagnosis: combination of 17 nucleotide substitutions, five of them unique among taxa analysed *, and four unique for the + +Cambeva + +beta-clade **: +COX 1 +216 (A → C) *, +COX 1 +249 (T → C), +COX 1 +252 (G → A), +COX 1 +471 (G → A), +COX 1 +534 (G → A), +CYTB +108 (C → T), +CYTB +186 (C → T) **, +CYTB +237 (C → T) *, +CYTB +360 (T → C) **, +CYTB +378 (C → T) *, +CYTB +442 (C → T) *, +CYTB +765 (C → T), +CYTB +909 (A → T) **, +CYTB +942 (A → G), +CYTB +960 (A → T) *, +CYTB +994 (A → C). +COX 1 +p-distances among congeners of the + +Cambeva + +beta-clade ranging from 1.2 ( + +Cambeva chrysornata +Costa, Feltrin & Katz, 2022 + +and + +Cambeva rotundipinna +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +) and 3.9. + + + + +Description. + + +Morphometric data appear in Table +4 +. + + + + + + +Morphometric data of + +Cambeva atrobrunnea +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
-HolotypeParatypes (n = 5)
Standard length (SL)70.146.8–78.5
+Percentage of standard length +
Body depth14.212.2–15.0
Caudal peduncle depth13.711.2–13.1
Body width12.110.3–12.8
Caudal peduncle width4.33.0–5.0
Pre-dorsal length67.763.5–67.2
Pre-pelvic length62.757.9–60.3
Dorsal-fin base length13.410.9–12.5
Anal-fin base length10.09.0–12.7
Caudal-fin length17.116.0–19.0
Pectoral-fin length12.011.6–13.1
Pelvic-fin length8.79.1–12.4
Head length22.319.5–24.7
+Percentage of head length +
Head depth43.939.7–51.9
Head width82.765.6–88.0
Snout length39.936.1–46.6
Interorbital width20.318.3–23.6
Preorbital length12.210.6–15.4
Eye diameter8.48.2–12.4
+ + + +Head morphology +. + +Barbels moderate in length. Nasal barbel reaching between orbit and opercular patch of odontodes, maxillary barbel reaching posterior portion of interopercular patch of odontodes, and rictal barbel reaching middle of interopercular patch of odontodes. Jaw teeth variable in shape, smaller teeth slightly pointed, larger teeth sub-incisiform with slightly rounded tip, irregularly arranged. Premaxillary teeth 39–41, dentary teeth 40. Opercular and interopercular odontodes pointed, about straight. Opercular odontodes 12; interopercular odontodes 20–22. Anterior infraorbital sensory canal absent. + + + +Fin morphology +. + +Dorsal and anal fins subtriangular, distal margin slightly convex. Total dorsal-fin rays 10 or 11 (ii + II – III + 6–7), total anal-fin rays 9 or 10 (ii + II + 5–6). Anal-fin origin at vertical just posterior to middle of dorsal-fin base, at base of 4 +th +branched dorsal-fin ray. Pectoral fin sub-triangular in dorsal view, margins slightly convex, first pectoral-fin ray shorter than second ray, not forming terminal filament. Total pectoral-fin rays 7 (I + 6). Pelvic fin rounded, its tip reaching vertical through anterior portion of dorsal-fin base. Total pelvic-fin rays 5 (I + 4). Caudal fin subtruncate, posterior margin weakly convex. Total principal caudal-fin rays 13 (I + 11 + I), total dorsal procurrent rays 21 (xix + II), total ventral procurrent rays 13 or 14 (xi – xii + II). + + + +Osteology +(Fig. +4 D – F +). + +Mesethmoid broader anteriorly, without lateral expansions in its main axis, anterior mesethmoid margin slightly convex. Mesethmoid cornu extremity rounded. Lateral ethmoid with small lateral projection immediately posterior to articular facet for autopalatine and small, twisted expansion on anterior margin. Lacrimal narrow, short and thin. Sesamoid supraorbital rod-shaped, narrower than lacrimal, its longitudinal length about two times and half longer than lacrimal longitudinal length, without lateral expansions. Premaxilla long, laterally narrowing, slightly curved. Maxilla slender, with rudimentary posterior process, slightly curved, its length about three fourths of premaxilla. Autopalatine sub-trapezoidal in dorsal view, medial margin sinuous, lateral margin weakly concave. Autopalatine postero-lateral process triangular, short, its length about half autopalatine length excluding anterior cartilage. Autopalatine articulation for lateral ethmoid with laminar shovel-shaped expansion. + +Metapterygoid sub-rectangular, longer than deep, relatively large, its surface greater than quadrate lateral surface. Areas anterior and posterior to cartilaginous articulation between metapterygoid and quadrate with small laminar overlapped expansions forming additional points of articulation. Quadrate with deep anterior constriction at dorsal process base. Hyomandibula long, anterior outgrowth horizontal length slightly longer than largest horizontal metapterygoid length; dorsal margin of hyomandibula outgrowth concave. Opercle elongate, longer than interopercle. Opercular odontode patch slender, its depth about half hyomandibula articular facet length. Dorsal process of opercle short, subtriangular, its extremity rounded. Opercular articular facet for hyomandibula with dorsal, trapezoidal laminar projection, articular facet for preopercle small, rounded. Interopercle moderate in length, interopercular odontode patch length about equal hyomandibula outgrowth length. Preopercle slender, with minute ventral projection. + +Parurohyal robust, lateral process subtriangular, slightly curved posteriorly, with pointed tip. Parurohyal head with prominent anterolateral paired process. Parurohyal middle foramen relatively large, oval. Parurohyal posterior process moderate in length, about half of distance between anterior margin of parurohyal and anterior insertion of posterior process. Branchiostegal rays 9. Vertebrae 39 or 40. Ribs 14 or 15. Dorsal-fin origin at vertical through centrum of 21 +st +or 22 +nd +vertebra; anal-fin origin at vertical through centrum of 25 +th +or 26 +th +vertebra. Two or one dorsal and single ventral hypural plate. + + + +Colouration in alcohol +. + +In adult specimens (Fig. +6 +), flank, dorsum, and head side light brownish yellow, with great concentration of small dark brown to black dots. Venter and ventral surface of head brownish white, with minute dark brown dots in area just anterior to pelvic fin. Nasal and maxillary barbels brown, rictal barbel brownish white. Fins hyaline, with minute dark brown dots on basal region of dorsal, anal and pectoral fins, and on whole caudal fin. In juvenile specimens below about +50 mm +SL (Fig. +7 +), flank, dorsum and head side light grey, with small black dots arranged in irregular longitudinal rows, coalesced on anterior portion of longitudinal midline of flank to form black stripe. + + + + + + + +Cambeva atrobrunnea +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +, holotype, + +UFRJ +14066 + +, 70.1 mm SL. +A. +Lateral view; +B. +Dorsal view; +C. +Ventral view. + + + + + + + + +Cambeva atrobrunnea +Costa, Feltrin & Katz + +, +sp. nov. +, paratype, + +UFRJ +13821 + +, 33.4 mm SL. +A. +Lateral view; +B. +Dorsal view; +C. +Ventral view. + + + + + +Distribution. + + + +Cambeva atrobrunnea + +is known from a single locality in a stream tributary of the Rio Timbó, Rio Iguaçu drainage, Rio +Paraná +basin, at about +970 m +asl (Fig. +5 +). + + + + +Etymology. + +From the Latin ater (dull black, dark) and brunneus (brown), referring to the predominant colour of the flank in adult specimens of the new species. + + + \ No newline at end of file