diff --git a/data/03/B2/EC/03B2EC28FF884F61FEC720A46B463EA5.xml b/data/03/B2/EC/03B2EC28FF884F61FEC720A46B463EA5.xml index e7434acfc22..2510d9fba6e 100644 --- a/data/03/B2/EC/03B2EC28FF884F61FEC720A46B463EA5.xml +++ b/data/03/B2/EC/03B2EC28FF884F61FEC720A46B463EA5.xml @@ -1,60 +1,61 @@ - - - -Redescription and new records of Synopia ultramarina Dana (Amphipoda: Synopiidae) from off the northeastern Brazil, with comments on its morphological variations + + + +Redescription and new records of Synopia ultramarina Dana (Amphipoda: Synopiidae) from off the northeastern Brazil, with comments on its morphological variations - - -Author + + +Author -Senna, André R. +Senna, André R. - - -Author + + +Author -Andrade, Luiz F. +Andrade, Luiz F. - - -Author + + +Author -Guedes, Urssula N. +Guedes, Urssula N. - - -Author + + +Author -Pereira-Filho, Guilherme H. +Pereira-Filho, Guilherme H. -text - - -Iheringia, Série Zoologia +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia - -2020 - -e 2020017 + +2020 + +e 2020017 - -2020-07-24 + +2020-07-24 - -110 + +110 - -1 -11 + +1 +11 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020017 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020017 -journal article -10.1590/1678-4766e2020017 -1678-4766 +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020017 +1678-4766 +13266368 @@ -72,7 +73,7 @@ ( -Figs 2–29 +Figs 2–29 ) @@ -193,54 +194,54 @@ longer than wide, laterally smooth, with a slight acclivity or laterally serrate Description. Based on females, UERJ 542 and MOUFPE 19642 ( -Fig. 2 +Fig. 2 ). Head ( -Fig. 3 +Fig. 3 ) protuberant with anterior keel; rostrum short; accessory eyes with 2 ommatidia. Antenna 1 ( -Fig. 4 +Fig. 4 ), peduncular article 1, anterior and posterior margins with 1 distal short seta each; article 2 anterior margin with 1 short seta distally, posterior margin with 2 short setae distally; article 3 naked; accessory flagellum 2-articulate; primary flagellum 5-articulate, article 1 with 8 callynophore. Antenna 2 ( -Fig. 5 +Fig. 5 ), peduncular article 3 anterior margin produced distally with a short seta, posterior margin with 1 medial short seta; articles 4–5 weakly setose with few short setae; flagellum 9-articulate. Upper lip ( -Fig. 7 +Fig. 7 ) rounded, apical margin with a small notch, setose. Right mandible ( -Fig. 11 +Fig. 11 ), molar strongly triturative and with a group of setules basally, incisor with 4 teeth, lacinia mobilis apically bifid, accessory setal row with 2 multicuspidate and 2 apically bifid setae; palp ( -Fig. 13 +Fig. 13 ) 3-articulate, article 1 short and subtriangular; article 2 very stout, about twice longer than wide, medial margin with row of setules and 1 pappose seta subdistally; article 3 very short, with 2 apical pappose setae. Left mandible ( -Fig. 10 +Fig. 10 ), lacinia mobilis with 4 teeth. Lower lip ( -Fig. 6 +Fig. 6 ), outer lobe laterally and apically setose, inner lobe apically setose. Maxilla 1 ( -Fig. 8 +Fig. 8 ), inner plate with 3 long medial pappose setae and 1 short apical seta; outer plate medial margin with row of setules, apically with 6 stout setae; palp 2-articulate, article 2 lateral margin with row of long setules, apically with 4 multicuspidate stout setae and 2 short simple setae. Maxilla 2 ( -Fig. 9 +Fig. 9 ), inner plate with distal field of setules, facial row of long setae present, medial and apical margins with row of long setae. Maxilliped ( -Fig. 12 +Fig. 12 ), inner plate about 0.4× the length of outer plate, medial margin with 1 plumose seta, apically with 2 slender and 1 stout plumose seta; outer plate about 0.8× the length of palp articles 1 and 2 combined, medial margin with 3 plumose setae, apical and lateral margins with 1 long plumose seta each; palp 4-articulate, article 2 with a row of 9 long plumose setae on the medial margin; article 3 with two pairs of subapical plumose setae; article 4 short, bearing a long apical slender seta. - + Fig. 2. @@ -250,7 +251,7 @@ Fig. 2. , habitus (MOUFPE 19642). Scale bar: 1.0 mm. - + Figs. 3–13. @@ -260,7 +261,7 @@ Figs. 3–13. , head; 4, 5, antennae 1–2; 6, lower lip; 7, upper lip; 8, 9, maxillae 1–2; 10, 11, left and right mandibles; 12, maxilliped (UERJ 542); 13, palp of mandible (MOUFPE 19642). Scale bars: 0.2 mm for Figs 4, 5; 0.1 mm for the remains. - + Figs. 14–17. @@ -274,34 +275,34 @@ Figs. 14–17. Pereon. Gnathopod 1 ( -Fig. 14 +Fig. 14 ) simple; coxa short, about 0.7× the length of coxa 2, with 2 posterodistal short setae; basis about 3.5× longer than wide, anterior margin with 2 long setae on a distal lobe, posterodistal corner with 1 seta; ischium short and subquadrate, posterodistal corner with 1 long pappose seta; merus posterior margin with 3 pappose setae; carpus twice longer than wide, anterior margin with 2 long pappose setae distally, posterior margin setose, with a row of long plumose setae; propodus ovate, about 1.6× longer than wide, anterior margin with 2 pappose setae distally, posterior margin setose with row of long plumose setae; palm acute; dactylus about 80% the length of propodus, nail elongate. Gnathopod 2 ( -Fig. 15 +Fig. 15 ) simple; coxa small, postero ventral margin with 2 setae; basis about 5.2× longer than wide, posterior margin with 2 long setae; ischium short and subrectangular, posterodistal corner with 1 seta; merus posterior margin with 2 short setae; carpus 3.8× longer than wide, posterior margin setose, with a row of long pappose setae; propodus 4.7× longer than wide, anterior margin with 1 long pappose seta distally, posterior margin setose, with a row of long pappose setae plus 2 longer pappose setae distally; dactylus vestigial, nail present. Pereopod 3 ( -Fig. 16 +Fig. 16 ), coxa with posterior lobe subquadrate and produced, posterodorsal margin excavate, ventral margin convex; basis 4.2× longer than wide, posterior margin with 3 setae, posteroventral corner with 1 seta; ischium short and subrectangular, posterior margin with 3 setae; merus1.5× longer than wide, anterior margin with 1 long plumose seta distally, posterior margin with 3 plumose setae; carpus 1.9× longer than wide, posterior margin setose, with a row of plumose setae; propodus posterior margin setose, with a row of plumose setae plus 1 longer plumose seta distally; dactylus about 50% the length of propodus, nail present. Pereopod 4 ( -Fig. 17 +Fig. 17 ), coxa subtriangular, postero distal lobe produced; basis 4.5× longer than wide, anterior margin with 3 long setae, posterodistal corner with 1 long seta; ischium short and subrectangular, posterodistal corner with 1 seta; merus 2.2× longer than wide, anterodistal margin produced, with 1 long plumose seta, posterior margin with 3 plumose setae; carpus twice longer than wide, posterior margin setose with a row of plumose setae;propodus 2.2× longer than wide, posterior margin setose, with a row of plumose setae; dactylus about 60% the length of propodus, nail present. Pereopod 5 ( -Fig. 18 +Fig. 18 ), coxa subtriangular and smooth; basis 1.2× longer than wide, suboval, posteroventral corner rounded; ischium short and subquadrate; merus anterior margin with 2 medial and 1 distal stout seta, posterior margin with 1 stout seta distally; carpus anterior margin with 1 medial and 2 distal stout setae, posterior margin with 1 stout seta distally; propodus 8.7× longer than wide, anterior margin with 1 medial and 2 distal stout setae, posterior margin with 1 medial and 1 distal stout seta; dactylus elongate, about 90% the length of propodus. Pereopod 6 ( -Fig. 19 +Fig. 19 ), coxa subrectangular, posteroventral lobe weakly produced; basis 1.4× longer than wide, suboval, posteroventral corner rounded; ischium short and subrectangular; merus anterior and posterior margins with 1 stout seta distally; carpus anterior margin with 1 stout seta distally, posterior margin with 2 stout setae distally; propodus 8.4× longer than wide, anterior margin with 1 medial and 1 distal stout seta, posterior margin with 1 medial stout seta; dactylus elongate, about 60% the length of propodus. Pereopod 7 ( -Fig. 20 +Fig. 20 ), coxa subrectangular, posteroventral corner weakly produced; basis 1.8× longer than wide, anterodistal corner with 1 short seta, posterodistal lobe well developed, subacute, almost reaching half of merus; ischium short and subrectangular; merus anterior and posterior margins with 1 stout seta distally; carpus, anterior margin with 1 medial and 2 distal stout setae, posterior margin with 1 distal stout seta; propodus 6× longer than wide, anterior margin with 3 medial and 2 distal stout setae, posterior margin with 2 distal stout setae; dactylus stout, about 60% the length of propodus. - + Figs. 18–23. @@ -311,7 +312,7 @@ Figs. 18–23. , pereopods 5–7; 21–23, epimeral plates 1–3 (UERJ 542). Scale bars: 0.2 mm. - + Figs. 24–29. @@ -325,33 +326,33 @@ Figs. 24–29. Pleon. Epimeral plate 1 ( -Fig. 21 +Fig. 21 ), anterior margin slightly concave, ventral margin naked, posteroventral corner rounded, posterior margin convex. Epimeral plate 2 ( -Fig. 22 +Fig. 22 ), anterior margin convex, ventral margin naked, posteroventral corner slightly produced into a subacute angle; Epimeral plate 3 ( -Fig. 23 +Fig. 23 ), anterior margin convex, ventral margin naked, posteroventral corner subquadrate, posterior margin almost straight. Urosomite 1 , anterodistal margin produced intoan acute tooth, with a weak sinuosity above. Uropod 1 ( -Fig. 24 +Fig. 24 ), peduncle 3.3× longer than wide,dorsal margin with 2 stout setae medially and 1 apically; outer ramus dorsolaterally setulose, apical margin with 3 stout setae; inner ramus 1.4× longer than outer ramus, ventrolaterally setulose, dorsal margin with 1 stout seta medially and 4 apically. Uropod 2 ( -Fig. 25 +Fig. 25 ), peduncle 2.6× longer than wide, dorsal margin with 1 stout seta medially and 1 apically; outer ramus slightly shorter than inner, dorsolaterally setulose, apical margin with 2 stout setae; inner ramus 1.2× longer than outer, ventrolaterally setulose, dorsal margin with 1 stout seta, bearing 2 setae apically. Uropod 3 ( -Fig. 26 +Fig. 26 ), peduncle short, slightly longer than wide, ventroapical margin with 1 stout seta; outer ramus slightly longer than inner, 2-articulate, article 1 with 2 setae dorsolaterally, article 2 about 30% the length of article 1, apical margin with 3 setae; inner ramus, ventrolateral margin with a proximal row of setules and 5 setae, apical margin with 2 setae. Telson ( -Figs. 27-29 +Figs. 27-29 ) 1.6× longer than wide, about 70% cleft, longer than peduncle of uropod 3, each lobe with 2 lateral setae, distalmost placed on a slight acclivity, and one long apical seta. diff --git a/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC1FFE8FC74FC3AFB18FDC5.xml b/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC1FFE8FC74FC3AFB18FDC5.xml index c4db734e55d..43bf9aa33b1 100644 --- a/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC1FFE8FC74FC3AFB18FDC5.xml +++ b/data/03/C6/D7/03C6D701FFC1FFE8FC74FC3AFB18FDC5.xml @@ -1,60 +1,62 @@ - - - -New records and a new species of Scaphopoda (Mollusca) from the southwestern Atlantic Ocean + + + +New records and a new species of Scaphopoda (Mollusca) from the southwestern Atlantic Ocean - - -Author + + +Author -Souza, Leonardo S. +Souza, Leonardo S. - - -Author + + +Author -Caetano, Carlos Henrique S. +Caetano, Carlos Henrique S. - - -Author + + +Author -Scarabino, Fabrizio +Scarabino, Fabrizio - - -Author + + +Author -Costa, Paulo Márcio S. +Costa, Paulo Márcio S. -text - - -Iheringia, Série Zoologia +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia - -2020 - -e 2020023 + +2020 + +e 2020023 - -2020-09-09 + +2020-09-09 - -110 + +110 - -1 -12 + +1 +12 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020023 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020023 -journal article -10.1590/1678-4766e2020023 -1678-4766 +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020023 +1678-4766 +13266286 +DB2C5318-CF45-4BA2-9708-5F8F42C0C5D5 @@ -72,11 +74,11 @@ ( -Figs 19–27 +Figs 19–27 ) - + Figs 13–18. @@ -923,7 +925,7 @@ shell); off . - + Figs 19–27. @@ -964,7 +966,7 @@ of ( USNM 887476) ( -Figs 19–22 +Figs 19–22 ) and two other paratypes ( @@ -1113,7 +1115,7 @@ In the present study, we report a new record of in the Rio Grande Rise, South Atlantic, extending the geographic distribution of the species southward. The two shells collected there ( -Figs 23–26 +Figs 23–26 ) closely resemble the morphology of the holotype of @@ -1121,13 +1123,13 @@ of C. platensis ( -Figs 19–22 +Figs 19–22 ). One of the shells from Rio Grande Rise is a younger specimen ( -Figs 25, 26 +Figs 25, 26 ), but the largest one ( -Figs 23, 24 +Figs 23, 24 ) presents similar dimensions with the holotype ( @@ -1141,7 +1143,7 @@ The present species is closely related to Jeffreys, 1877 ( -Figs 28–35 +Figs 28–35 ), from eastern Atlantic, regarding shell morphology. HENDERSON (1920) recognized these similarities and the shape variation at the equator in both of them, but preferred to separate the western Atlantic specimens introducing a new name. @@ -1159,13 +1161,13 @@ with a somewhat larger shell than C. platensis can be distinguished by the slowly reduction of the diameter of the shell towards the dorsal aperture ( -Figs 19, 23, 25, 27 +Figs 19, 23, 25, 27 ), while this reduction is more abrupt in C. tumidosus ( -Figs 28, 30, 32, 34 +Figs 28, 30, 32, 34 ). diff --git a/data/03/CF/99/03CF994FFF86FFC3FCF7FDB2841AF8F3.xml b/data/03/CF/99/03CF994FFF86FFC3FCF7FDB2841AF8F3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0309acafc6f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/CF/99/03CF994FFF86FFC3FCF7FDB2841AF8F3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ + + + +A new synonymy in Neoptychodes (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) and notes on Neoptychodes cosmeticus with a revised key to species of the genus + + + +Author + +Santos-Silva, Antonio + + + +Author + +Botero, Juan Pablo + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2023 + +e 2023014 + + +2023-10-23 + + +113 + + +1 +6 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2023014 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2023014 +1678-4766 +13266592 +347D7AA3-55BE-4B80-8178-B5C98153F2F4 + + + + + + + +Neoptychodes cosmeticus +Martins & Galileo, 1996 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 6, 7 +, +13–17 +) + + + + + + + +Neoptychodes cosmeticus +MARTINS & GALILEO, 1996:293 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks. According to +MARTINS & GALILEO (1996) +: “ +Holótipo +fêmea [ +Holotype +female], +COLÔMBIA +, + + +Valle del +Cauca + + +: Cali, +VIII.1969 +, L. Denhez +leg. +(MNRJ). +Parátipos +[ +Paratypes +]: macho [male], mesmos dados do +holótipo +[same data as +holotype +], 1970 (MZSP). Fêmea [Female], +EQUADOR +[ +ECUADOR +], + +Pichincha + +: Santo Domingo (Tinalandia +16km +S, +680m +), +15-28.VI.1975 +, S. & J. Peck +leg. +(CMNC).” + + + +The +specimen photographed by +Steven W. Lingafelter +( +Fig. 6 +) at +MNRJ +and labeled as +holotype +, which was destroyed by fire, is a male, and not a female and does not agree with the photograph of the +holotype +in the original description ( +Fig. 7 +). The +paratype +“male” photographed by +Steven W. Lingafelter +( +Figs 13–17 +) at +MZSP +is a female, and has the correct label of the +holotype +locality as indicated in the original description ( +Fig. 17 +) (“ +COLÔMBIA +, + + +Valle del +Cauca + + +: Cali”). Without a doubt, the +paratype +male (destroyed in fire) that belonged to the +MZSP +was wrongly sent to the +MNRJ +and, probably, had a +holotype +label; the +holotype +female that belonged to the +MNRJ +remained at +MZSP +and has a +paratype +label. To complicate matters, the photograph in the original description ( +Fig. 7 +), indicated as being of the +holotype +, is actually of the female +paratype +deposited in the +CMNC +. There is no doubt about this because the female +holotype +, as per the original description, was the only specimen of that sex in the type series from Colombia, and this specimen is in the +MZSP +and does not agree with the photograph in the original description + +. + + +According to +MARTINS & GALILEO (1996) +: “Dimensões +holótipo +fêmea [Dimensions of the +holotype +female – in mm]. Comprimento total [Total length] 25,2. Protórax [Prothorax]: comprimento [length] 4,1; maior largura [largest width] 5,0. Comprimento elitral [Elytral length] 18,2; largura umeral [humeral width] 7,0.” However, the true dimensions are: Total length, 27.2 mm; prothoracic length, 4.6 mm; largest width of the prothorax, 5.8 mm; humeral width, 8.0; and elytral length, 19.5 mm. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFCFBFD3B02B31A38.xml b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFCFBFD3B02B31A38.xml index fb0ff8b1144..22a321706c1 100644 --- a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFCFBFD3B02B31A38.xml +++ b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFCFBFD3B02B31A38.xml @@ -1,42 +1,43 @@ - - - -The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Vivallo, Felipe +Vivallo, Felipe -text - - -Iheringia, Série Zoologia +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia - -2020 - -e 2020020 + +2020 + +e 2020020 - -2020-08-17 + +2020-08-17 - -110 + +110 - -1 -7 + +1 +7 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 -journal article -10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 -1678-4766 +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 +1678-4766 +13266247 @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ ( -Figs. 11, 12 +Figs. 11, 12 ) @@ -124,7 +125,7 @@ are the only species of ) present in the Caribbean, being the latter species the only that has been recorded in Cuba . The female has the body completely covered by dark brown pilosity ( -Figs. 11, 12 +Figs. 11, 12 ), except for the light brown or yellowish pilosity near the pronotal lobe, and the clypeus and terga with relatively uniform punctation. Photos of both sexes can be found in VIVALLO (2014) . This species has been recorded in diff --git a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFF7DFD5B03BD1D42.xml b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFF7DFD5B03BD1D42.xml index 2c9c8222731..8cb7468fbd6 100644 --- a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFF7DFD5B03BD1D42.xml +++ b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFA5E3AFF7DFD5B03BD1D42.xml @@ -1,44 +1,45 @@ - - - -The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Vivallo, Felipe +Vivallo, Felipe -text - - -Iheringia, Série Zoologia +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia - -2020 - -e 2020020 + +2020 + +e 2020020 - -2020-08-17 + +2020-08-17 - -110 + +110 - -1 -7 + +1 +7 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 -journal article -10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 -1678-4766 +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 +1678-4766 +13266247 - + @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ ( -Figs. 9, 10 +Figs. 9, 10 ) @@ -129,9 +130,9 @@ specimens of lanosa were collected. The females have the first flagellomere slightly shorter than the following three segments combined and the metasoma with bluish metallic reflections. Males can be identified by the yellowish hairs on head and mesosoma ( -Fig. 10 +Fig. 10 ), by the paraocular area, the base of the mandible and the anterior surface of the scape yellow ( -Fig. 9 +Fig. 9 ); and by the clypeus with relatively dense punctation, except for a longitudinal unpunctate median line on disc. Centris lanosa diff --git a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3AFCFCFDD405151DE2.xml b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3AFCFCFDD405151DE2.xml index ca74e252899..e58ac8c612c 100644 --- a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3AFCFCFDD405151DE2.xml +++ b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3AFCFCFDD405151DE2.xml @@ -1,44 +1,45 @@ - - - -The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Vivallo, Felipe +Vivallo, Felipe -text - - -Iheringia, Série Zoologia +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia - -2020 - -e 2020020 + +2020 + +e 2020020 - -2020-08-17 + +2020-08-17 - -110 + +110 - -1 -7 + +1 +7 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 -journal article -10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 -1678-4766 +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 +1678-4766 +13266247 - + @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ Cresson, 1879 ( -Figs 7, 8 +Figs 7, 8 ) @@ -80,7 +81,7 @@ Cresson, 1879 . - + Figs 5, 6. @@ -90,7 +91,7 @@ Cresson, 1879 , holotype male: 5, head, frontal view; 6, habitus, lateral view. - + Figs 7, 8. @@ -141,9 +142,9 @@ and otomita . Females of this species can be identified by the two yellow triangles on clypeus and the smooth and shiny integument between the punctures of the clypeal disc ( -Fig. 7 +Fig. 7 ), the orange brown metasoma, the scopa whitish on tibia and brownish on basitarsus ( -Fig. 8 +Fig. 8 ) and by the orange lanceolate hairs on the lower corner of the pronotum. Photos of both sexes of this species can be found in VIVALLO & ZANELLA (2012) . The diff --git a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3DFF4DFE1402B41D3D.xml b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3DFF4DFE1402B41D3D.xml index fab559811d6..fbc7b78d166 100644 --- a/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3DFF4DFE1402B41D3D.xml +++ b/data/03/F3/87/03F387B2FFFD5E3DFF4DFE1402B41D3D.xml @@ -1,44 +1,45 @@ - - - -The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +The Centris bees described by Ezra Townsend Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Vivallo, Felipe +Vivallo, Felipe -text - - -Iheringia, Série Zoologia +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia - -2020 - -e 2020020 + +2020 + +e 2020020 - -2020-08-17 + +2020-08-17 - -110 + +110 - -1 -7 + +1 +7 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 -journal article -10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 -1678-4766 +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2020020 +1678-4766 +13266247 - + @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ Cresson, 1879 ( -Figs 5, 6 +Figs 5, 6 ) @@ -145,13 +146,13 @@ synonymized this latter species with analis . Males of this species can be identified by the tridentate mandibles with the innermost teeth reduced and close to each other, the yellow spot on the anterior surface of the scape ( -Fig. 5 +Fig. 5 ) and by the mostly blackish pubescence on T 2- T 4 ( -Fig. 6 +Fig. 6 ). This is the most common and widely distributed species of C . ( diff --git a/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE60445C865EFCD6FB1466FC.xml b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE60445C865EFCD6FB1466FC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c5e0c0aa0ca --- /dev/null +++ b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE60445C865EFCD6FB1466FC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,875 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the parasitic wasps Bephrata (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea, Eurytomidae) in Brazil + + + +Author + +Perioto, Nelson W. + + + +Author + +Fernandes, Daniell R. R. + + + +Author + +Lara, Rogéria I. R. + + + +Author + +Tavares, Marcelo T. + + + +Author + +Rafael, José A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2023 + +e 2023010 + + +2023-07-07 + + +113 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Bephrata lorraineae +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 13, 14 +) + + +New records. Manaus (AM), Fernando de Noronha archipelago (PE), MarliÉria (MG), Domingos Martins, Cariacica, Guarapari, ItaguaÇÚ, Laranja da Terra, Santa Maria de JetibÁ, Santa Leopoldina, Santa Teresa and Vitória (ES), Nova IguaÇu (RJ), Luiz Antônio, MatÃo, RibeirÃo Grande, Iguape, and Ubatuba (SP), and Morretes ( +PR +) ( +Fig. 14 +). + + + +Material examined. +Holotype +female ( +USNM +) (images examined, available at http://n +2t +.net/ark:/65665/3c11118c9- 34ff-41ae-a7d0-4eabd557fa7e) and +91 females +and +25 males +. “ +COSTA RICA +, Puntarenas, +R.F. Golfo Dulce +, 24kmW, Piedras Blancas, + +200m + +, IV-V.1992, col. +P. Hanson +”; “BRASIL, +AM +, Manaus, Embrapa-Guar. org., + +23.xi.2012 + +, +2°53’29.14”S +/ +59°58’45.80”O +, Borda Malaise Lote: 1909, +Karine Schoeninger +col.”, +1 female +( +INPA +); “ +BRASIL +, +PE +, Fernando de Noronha, +3°51’17”S +/ +32°26’26”W +, CapimAÇu, + +9-24.vi.2019 + +, Malaise G., +J.A. Rafael +, +F. Limeira-de-Oliveira +, +L.C. Castro +col.”, +3 males +( +INPA +); same data except + +24.vi-8.vii.2019 + +, +1 male +( +INPA +); same data except + +23.vii-7.viii.2019 + +, +2 females +( +INPA +); same data except + +7-21. viii.2019 + +, +1 female +( +INPA +); same data except + +21.viii-8. ix.2019 + +, +3 females +and +1 male +( +INPA +); same data except + +8-25.ix.2019 + +, +1 female +( +INPA +); same data except + +25.ix- 8.x.2019 + +, +6 females +( +INPA +); same data except + +8-27.x.2019 + +, +23 females +and +3 males +( +INPA +); same data except + +27.x-11. xi.2019 + +, +7 females +( +INPA +); same data except + +27.xi-9.xii.2019 + +, +2 females +( +INPA +); same data except, Sancho, + +23.vii-7. viii.2019 + +, Malaise PQ., +1 female +( +INPA +); same data except +3°51’30”S +/ +32°25’50”W +, Sueste mangue, + +20-27.ii.2020 + +, Malaise G., +2 females +( +INPA +); same data except +3°51’30”S +/ +32°25’50”W +, Sueste mangue, + +1-9.VI.2019 + +, Arm. Luz, +J.A. Rafael +, +F. Limeira-de-Oliveira +, +D.M.M. Mendes +, +4 females +( +INPA +); “BRASIL, +MG +, MarliÉria, +P. E. Rio Doce +( +PELD +), Área Tereza 3, +19°37’S +42°34’O +, + +28.x-04.xi.2007 + +, Malaise, +J.C.R. Fontenelle +, col.”, +2 females +( +UFES #148803 +, +148804 +); “ +BRASIL +, +ES +, Domingos Martins, Mata Pico do Eldorado, +20°22’17”S +40°39’29”W +, + +03-10.xii.2004 + +, Malaise T7, +M.T. Tavares +e eQ. cols.”, +1 female +( +UFES #64932 +); “BRASIL, +ES +, Cariacica, Res. Biol. Duas Bocas, + +22.x-05.xii.1996 + +, varredura, +N. Freitas +, +H.S. Santos +, +C.O. Azevedo +cols.”, +1 female +and +2 males +( +UFES #111707 +, +110856 +, +118852 +); same data except + +16.ix.2006 + +, Malaise, +R. Kawada +e eQ. cols., +1 female +( +UFES #116601 +); “ +BRASIL +, +ES +, Guarapari, PQ. Est. Paulo Cesar Vinha, +20°36’S +40°25’W +, + +4 masl + +, + +26.x.2006 + +, varredura, +M.T. Tavares +e eQ. cols.”, +1 male +( +UFES #069690 +); “BRASIL, +ES +, ItaguaÇÚ,Alto Lajunha, Faz. Binda, +19°48’S +40°48’W +, + +22-29.ix.2008 + +, Malaise, +M.T. Tavares +e eQ. cols”, +1 female +( +UFES #83323 +); “ +BRASIL +, +ES +, Laranja da Terra, Joatuba, Faz. Betzel, + +280-430m + +, +19°50’25”S +40°49’40”W +, + +05-12.x.2012 + +, Malaise, +M.T. Tavares +e eQ. cols.”, +2 females +( +UFES #135010 +, +136643 +); “BRASIL, +ES +, Santa Maria de JetibÁ, Faz. Paulo Seick, +20°02’31,1”S +40°41’51,3”W +, + +29.xi- 06.xii.2002 + +, Malaise T4, +M.T. Tavares +e eQ. cols.”, +1 female +( +UFES #95073 +); “ +BRASIL +, +ES +, Santa Leopoldina, SuíÇa, mata, + +361m + +, +20°04’54,6”S +40°35’38,9”W +, + +05-12.xi.2007 + +, Malaise, +C.O. Azevedo +e eQ. cols.”, +1 female +and +1 male +( +UFES #69825 +, +69828 +); “ +BRASIL +, +ES +, Santa Teresa, Est. Biol. Santa LÚcia, + +13-17.x.2008 + +, Malaise, +M.T. Tavares +e eQ. cols.”, +1 female +( +UFES #91937 +); same data, + +29.vi.2001 + +, varredura, +R. Kawada +& +C.O. Azevedo +cols, +1 male +( +UFES #07007 +); “ +BRASIL +, +ES +, Vitória, PQ. Est. Fonte Grande, + +07.ix.2000 + +, varredura, +C.O. Azevedo +, +R. Kawada +, +H.S. Santos +cols.”, +1 male +( +UFES #07027 +); same data except + +24.xi.2000 + +, +R. Kawada +e +H.S. Santos +cols., +2 males +( +UFES #07028 +, +07040 +); same data except + +22.II.2001 + +, CO Azevedo & R Kawada cols., +2 males +( +UFES #06973 +, +06974 +); same data except + +26.III.2001 + +, +4 males +( +UFES #906975-06978 +); same data except + +20.IV.2001 + +, +3 males +( +UFES #09970-09972 +); “Brasil, +RJ +, Nova IguaÇu, Res. Biol. TinguÁ, +22°34’38”S +43°26’09”O +, arm. Malaise, + +05-08/III/2002 + +, +S.T.P. Amarante +e eQ., cols.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #20708 +); “ +BRASIL +, +SP +, Luiz Antônio, EstaÇÃo Ecológica de Jataí, +21°37’25.7”S +/ +47°48’26.1”O +, alt. + +530 m + +– Malaise, + +30/XI/2006 + +, mata ciliar, +N.W. Perioto +e eQ., cols.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #20714 +); same data except +21°37’23.7”S +/ +47°48’27.8”W +, + +5/XII/2007 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #22578 +); same data except +21°37’23.7”S +/ +47°48’27.8”W +, + +29/X/2008 + +, +2 females +( +LRRP #22592 +, +22595 +); same data except +21°37’23.7”S +/ +47°48’27.8”W +, + +12/XI/2008 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #22600 +); “BRASIL, +SP +, MatÃo, Faz. Cambuí, Mata da Virgínia, + +3/IX/2009 + +, +A.M.P. Dias +e eQ., cols.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #21453 +); “ +BRASIL +, +SP +, RibeirÃo Grande, ParQue Estadual Intervales, +24°16’23.6”S +/ +48°25’21.8”O +, arm. Malaise, + +22/XII/2009 + +, +N.W. Perioto +e eQ., cols.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #20695 +); same data except + +22/II/2010 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #20696 +); “BRASIL, +SP +, Iguape, EstaÇÃo Ecológica JurÉia-Itatins, +24°31’12.0”S +/ +47°12’05.8”O +, arm. Malaise, + +19/I/2010 + +, +N.W. Perioto +e eQ., cols.”, +2 females +( +LRRP #21612 +, +21616 +); same data except + +17/I/2011 + +, +2 females +( +LRRP #22614 +, +22618 +); same data except + +17 / II / 2011 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #22620 +); same data except + +17/ III/2011 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #22615 +); “ +BRASIL +, +SP +, Ubatuba, PESM NÚcleo Picinguaba, +23°20’08”S +/ +44°49’57.2”O +, arm. Malaise, + +19/XI/2009 + +, +N.W. Perioto +e eQ., cols.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #20681 +); same data except +23°19’58.8”S +/ +44°49’56.7”O +, +1 female +( +LRRP #20682 +); same data except + +18/ II/2010 + +, +2 females +( +LRRP #20683 +, +20684 +); same data except +23°19’56.9”S +/ +44°49’55.2”O +, + +19/III/2010 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #20685 +); same data except + +19/IV/2010 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #20686 +); same data except +23°19’56.9”S +/ +44°49’55.2”O +, + +19/IV/2010 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #20687 +); same data except +23°20’02.7”S +/ +44°49’57.7”W +, + +19/IV/2010 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #20688 +); same data except + +19 / IV / 2010 + +, +2 females +( +LRRP #20489 +, +20690 +); same data except +ParQue Est. da Serra do Mar +, +23°21’43”S +/ +44°49’22”W +, + +21-24/I/2002 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #20710 +); “BRASIL, +PR +– Morretes, PQ. Estadual Pau Oco, +25°34’37.2”S +48°23’53.7”S +, arm. Malaise, + +10-13/ VI/2002 + +, +M.T. Tavares +e eQ., cols.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #20707 +). + + + + +Figs 13, 14. + +Bephrata lorraineae +Gates & Hanson, 2009: 13 + +, lateral habitus, female; 14, distribution map; red circles = previous records, blue circles = new records. + + + + +Fig 15. + +Bephrata lorraineae +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + +. Seasonality at the Capim-AÇu trail, Fernando de Noronha archipelago, Pernambuco, Brazil, 2019-2020. + + + +Identification. According +GATES & HANSON (2009) + +B +. +lorraineae + +is recognized for presenting lower face completely yellow; the procoxa with sinuous groove on anterior surface; lateral area of mesoscutum orange or black; mesoscutellum entirely black; female pronotum with extensive black; fore wing without dark spot; metacoxa completely yellow; metatibia black (dark brown in some specimens here studied), at least in part; female first metasomal segment much wider than long and length of female gaster no more than 5× maximum height and without continuous pale stripe on lateral surface. The specimens collected in Iguape (SP) have the metacoxae black stained. + + +Discussion. + +Bephrata lorraineae + +was previously found in +Costa Rica +, +Venezuela +, +Colombia +, +Ecuador +and +Peru +( +GATES & HANSON, 2009 +; +NOYES, 2019 +) in Amazon rainforest. Now the species is reported for the first time for +Brazil +in Fernando de Noronha archipelago (PE), in Atlantic rainforest areas in the +Minas Gerais +, +Espírito Santo +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +SÃo Paulo +, and +ParanÁ +states, and in a interface between Amazon rainforest and guarana crop [ + +Paullinia cupana +Mart. + +( +Sapindaceae +)] in Amazonas state. Data based on nine months of samplings in Fernando de Noronha archipelago indicate that for that locality the largest populations of + +B. lorraineae + +occur in the dry season, with few specimens collected in the rainy season, which may indicate a possible seasonality of this group, or of its possible hosts ( +Fig. 15 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE61445E8643F96CFD796354.xml b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE61445E8643F96CFD796354.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..738416a1f8c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE61445E8643F96CFD796354.xml @@ -0,0 +1,213 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the parasitic wasps Bephrata (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea, Eurytomidae) in Brazil + + + +Author + +Perioto, Nelson W. + + + +Author + +Fernandes, Daniell R. R. + + + +Author + +Lara, Rogéria I. R. + + + +Author + +Tavares, Marcelo T. + + + +Author + +Rafael, José A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2023 + +e 2023010 + + +2023-07-07 + + +113 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Bephrata leptogaster +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 11, 12 +) + +New records. Amajari (RR), UruÇuca (BA), and + +Ubatuba (SP) ( +Fig. 12 +). + + + +Figs 11, 12. + +Bephrata leptogaster +Gates & Hanson, 2009: 11 + +, lateral habitus; 12, distribution map; red circles = previous records, blue circles = new records. + + + + +Material +examined. +3 females +and +1 male +. “ +BRAZIL +, +Roraima +, Amajari, TepeQuÉm, SESC, +03°44’45”N +/ +61°43’40”W +, + +1-15.XI.2016 + +, Malaise PeQuena, +J.A. Rafael +, +R. Boldrini +”, +1 female +( +INPA +); same data except + +14-29. XII.2015 + +, Malaise, +1 female +( +INPA +); “BRASIL, +BA +, UruÇuca, Fazenda Bom Jardim, 14°34’94”S 39°17’85”W, + +23.xi.2002 + +, Malaise Pt8, +J.C. Cardoso +e +J. Maia +cols.”, +1 female +( +UFES #49056 +); “ +BRASIL +, +SP +, Ubatuba, + +29.xii.1991 + +, Moericke, +N.F. Cristo +col.”, +1 male +( +UFES #160056 +) + +. + + +Identification. According to +GATES & HANSON (2009) +, + +B +. +leptogaster + +is recognized by the extremelly elongate gaster (6× as long as high), specially in females. In addition, this species presents the procoxa with a sinuous groove on anterior surface, the lower face yellow (except for small black spot in the middle), the mesosoma with dorsum completely black, the fore wing without dark spot and with veins very thin, and the metatibia mainly black. In males, the mesoscutum and mesoscutellum presents transverse wrinkles and the pronotum is sligthly concave dorsally. + + +Discussion. + +Bephrata leptogaster + +was previously found in +Venezuela +, +Colombia +, +Ecuador +and +Peru +( +GATES & HANSON, 2009 +; +NOYES, 2019 +) and now this species is reported for the first time for +Brazil +in the Amazon rainforest, in +Roraima state +, and in the Atlantic rainforest, in +Bahia +and +SÃo Paulo +states. The female specimen from UruÇuca (BA) presents the lower face mostly darkened (from brown to black, except by the yellow margins), much larger than the small spot in the middle of lower face pointed by +GATES & HANSON (2009) +. However, the former female agrees with the remaining features of original description of + +B. leptogaster + +and the male agrees with the whole description. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE624453868FFCAEFB4E64F9.xml b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE624453868FFCAEFB4E64F9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..990f613bf27 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE624453868FFCAEFB4E64F9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the parasitic wasps Bephrata (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea, Eurytomidae) in Brazil + + + +Author + +Perioto, Nelson W. + + + +Author + +Fernandes, Daniell R. R. + + + +Author + +Lara, Rogéria I. R. + + + +Author + +Tavares, Marcelo T. + + + +Author + +Rafael, José A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2023 + +e 2023010 + + +2023-07-07 + + +113 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Bephrata ruficollis +Cameron, 1884 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 16, 17 +) + + +New records. Bujari (AC), Manaus (AM) and, Santa Teresa and Ibitirama (ES) ( +Fig. 17 +) + + + +Material +examined. +6 females +. “ +BRASIL +, +AC +, Bujari, FES Antimary, +09°20’01”S +– +68°19’17”W +, Malaise Grande, + +18-31.I.2017 + +, EF Morato & JA Rafael, Rede Bia”, +1 female +( +INPA +); “ +BRASIL +, +AM +, Manaus, Embrapa-Guar. conv., + +10.xi.2012 + +, +2°53’42.18”S +/ +59°59’10.58”O +, Mata, Malaise Lote: 1820, +Karine Schoeninger +col.”, +1 female +( +INPA +); “ +BRASIL +, +ES +, Santa Teresa, Res. Biol. Augusto Ruschi, trilha da Cachoeira, + +812m + +, +19°54’29”S +40°33’19”W +,\ + +10- 17.xii.2012 + +, Malaise 7, +C.O. Azevedo +e eQ. cols.”, +1 female +( +UFES #144434 +); “ +BRASIL +, +ES +, Ibitirama, ParQue Nacional do Caparaó, Posto Santa Marta, +20°29’S +41°43’W +, + +10- 14.iii.2006 + +, Malaise, +R. Kawada +col.”, +3 females +( +UFES #65996-65997 +) + +. + + + +Figs 16, 17. + +Bephrata ruficollis +Cameron, 1884: 16 + +, lateral habitus; 17, distribution map; red circles = previous records, blue circles = new records. + + + +Identification.According to +GATES & HANSON (2009) +, + +B +. +ruficollis + +is recognized for presenting the metatibia completely yellow and is the only species in which the clava is white (pale yellow in some specimens here studied), differing from the other brown/black flagellomeres. + + +Discussion. + +Bephrata ruficollis + +was previously found in +Costa Rica +, +Panama +, +Venezuela +, and +Ecuador +( +GATES & HANSON, 2009 +; +NOYES, 2019 +). Now the species is reported for the first time for +Brazil +in Amazon rainforest in the state of +Acre +and Amazonas, and in Atlantic rainforest in the state of +Espírito Santo +, about 2.600 and +5.300 km +southeast, respectively, from the +type +locality. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE644459868AFCC1FA766661.xml b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE644459868AFCC1FA766661.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f64603645fd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE644459868AFCC1FA766661.xml @@ -0,0 +1,437 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the parasitic wasps Bephrata (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea, Eurytomidae) in Brazil + + + +Author + +Perioto, Nelson W. + + + +Author + +Fernandes, Daniell R. R. + + + +Author + +Lara, Rogéria I. R. + + + +Author + +Tavares, Marcelo T. + + + +Author + +Rafael, José A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2023 + +e 2023010 + + +2023-07-07 + + +113 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Bephrata bahiae +( +Ashmead, 1904 +) + + + + + + + +( +Figs 1, 2 +) + + + + + + + +Aximogastra bahiae +ASHMEAD, 1904:261 + + +. + + + + + +Bephrata bahiae + +: + + +LOTFALIZADEH +et al. +, 2007:509 + + +. + + + +New records. PatÚ and Mossoró (RN), Chapada GaÚcha (MG), Domingos Martins and Santa Teresa (ES), Descalvado, RibeirÃo Grande and SÃo Luis do Paraitinga (SP), and Teresópolis (RJ) ( +Fig. 2 +). + + + + +Material examined. +30 females +. “Brasil, +RN +, PatÚ, +06°06’S +/ +37°37’W +, caatinga, arm. Malaise, setembro/2008, D. R. R. Fernandes e eQ., cols.”, +4 females +( +LRRP +#18394, 18399, 18404, 18412); + +same data except outubro/2008, +8 females +( +LRRP #18395-18397 +, +18400-18402 +, +18405 +, +18410 +) + +; + +same data except novembro/2008, +1 female +( +LRRP #18407 +); “Brasil, +RN +. +Mossoró +, +Faz. Sta. Julia +– caatinga, +05°01’10”S +/ +37°22’56”O +, armadilha Malaise, + +14.IV.2008 + +, +D. R. R. Fernandes +e eQ., cols.”, +3 females +( +LRRP #20702- 20704 +); “ +BRA +, +MG +, Chapada GaÚcha, PARNA Grande SertÃo Veredas, +15°10’30.6”S +/ +45°43’16.6”W +, cerrado / arm. Malaise, + +11/IX/2018 + +, +N. W. Perioto +e +R. I. R. Lara +, cols.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #20711 +) + +; + +same data except + +6/IX/2018 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #20712 +) + +; + +same data except + +9/IV/2019 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #20713 +); “ +BRASIL +, +ES +, +Domingos Martins +, +Mata Pico do Eldorado +, +20°22’17”S +40°39’29”W +, + +03-10.xii.2004 + +, Malaise T7, +M. T. Tavares +and eQ. cols.”, +1 female +( +UFES #64931 +); “Brasil, +ES +, Santa Teresa, Est. Biol. Sta. Lucia, +19°58’25.2”S +40°31’44.6”W +, varredura veg., + +11/IV/2001 + +, +C. O. Azevedo +e eQ., cols.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #20706 +); “ +BRA +, +SP +, Descalvado, Fazenda ItaÚnas, +21°54’05”S +/ +47°37’26”W +, arm. Malaise, cerrado, + +21/VI/2006 + +, +N. W. Perioto +e eQ. cols.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #22641 +); “Brasil, +SP +, RibeirÃo Grande, ParQue Estadual Intervales, +24°16’28.0”S +/ +48°25’14.8”O +, arm. Malaise, + +22/IV/2010 + +, +N. W. Perioto +e eQ., cols.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #20676 +) + +; + +same data except +24°16’27.7”S +/ +48°25’19.3”O +, + +22/VII/2010 + +, +1 female +( +LRRP #20677 +); “ +BR +, +SP +, SÃo +Luis do Paraitinga +, PESM - NÚcleo +Santa Virgínia +, +23°19’24.8”S +/ +45°05’40.1”O +, arm. Malaise, + +22/IX/2010 + +, N. W. Perioto e eQ., cols.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #20678 +) + +; + +same data except +23°19’16.9”S +/ +45°05’46.6”O +, + +23/XI/2009 + +, +2 females +( +LRRP #20679 +, +20680 +) + +; + +same data except +45°05’46.6”O +/ +23°19’16.9”S +, + +20/X/2011 + +, +2 females +( +LRRP #20715 +, +20716 +); “ +BRA +, +RJ +, +Teresópolis +, PARNA Serra dos ÓrgÃos, + +3/IX/2009 + +, +V. Flinte +, col.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #21451 +) + +. + + + +Figs 1, 2. + +Bephrata bahiae +( +Ashmead, 1904 +) + +: 1, lateral habitus, female; 2, distribution map; red circles; previous records, blue circles = new records. + + + +Identification.According to +GATES & HANSON (2009) +, + +B. bahiae + +is recognized for presenting the dorsal-posterior part of head with yellow area between occiput and ocellar area; mesoscutum and mesoscutellum pale yellow or orange yellow; center of pronotum with very narrow, longitudinal black line; procoxa with sinuous groove on anterior surface and metatibia black, at least in part. The specimen collected in Descalvado ( +SP +) has the pronotum completely yellow, without longitudinal black line. + + +Discussion. + +Bephrata bahiae + +has been found previously in +Costa Rica +and +Colombia +and, in +Brazil +, has been recorded in state of +Bahia +( +GATES & HANSON, 2009 +; +NOYES, 2019 +). The new distributional records, in five Brazilian states ( +RN +, +MG +, +ES +, +RJ +and +SP +) represent a significant increase of the distribution range in +Brazil +and indicate that this species can develop in different biomes such as Brazilian savannah, Atlantic rainforest and Caatinga. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE66445885D4FD98FBE3650B.xml b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE66445885D4FD98FBE3650B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..998ee4d4f0f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE66445885D4FD98FBE3650B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the parasitic wasps Bephrata (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea, Eurytomidae) in Brazil + + + +Author + +Perioto, Nelson W. + + + +Author + +Fernandes, Daniell R. R. + + + +Author + +Lara, Rogéria I. R. + + + +Author + +Tavares, Marcelo T. + + + +Author + +Rafael, José A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2023 + +e 2023010 + + +2023-07-07 + + +113 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Bephrata chica +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 5, 6 +) + + + +Material examined. +1 female +. +Holotype +female ( +USNM +) (images examined, available at http://n +2t +.net/ ark:/65665/397e42c5d-9088-4da3-8cb1-b52a5adf3732): “ +ECUADOR +, +Napo +, +Reserva Etnica Waorani +, Transect Ent. +1 km +S. Okone Gare Camp +, +00°39’10”S +76°26’0”W +, + +220 m + +, + +8.X.1995 + +, +T. Erwin +et al., Canopy fogging, t10.5 #1265”. + + + +Identification.According to +GATES & HANSON (2009) + +B. chica + +is a small species, with about +4 mm +long, with black mesosoma (except yellowish lateral pronotum) and yellowish lower face. + + +Discussion. +GATES & HANSON (2009 +, p. 40), when describing + +Bephrata chica + +, stated that this species “can be distinguished by its black hind legs (except for the tarsi)”. However, when analyzing the holotype’s image, we verified that the hind leg of this specimen has coxa and femur almost entirely colored of yellowish brown, brown tibia, and yellowish tarsi. + + + +Bephrata chica + +has been found previously in +EQuador +, +Peru +and +Brazil +(AM) ( +Fig 6 +) ( +GATES & HANSON, 2009 +; + + +NOYES, 2019 +). Only +two specimens +( +paratypes +) are known for +Brazil +, both collected in Amazonas state ( +GATES & HANSON, 2009 +; +NOYES, 2019 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE6644588651FEA7FAD86012.xml b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE6644588651FEA7FAD86012.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ba9faedb504 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE6644588651FEA7FAD86012.xml @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the parasitic wasps Bephrata (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea, Eurytomidae) in Brazil + + + +Author + +Perioto, Nelson W. + + + +Author + +Fernandes, Daniell R. R. + + + +Author + +Lara, Rogéria I. R. + + + +Author + +Tavares, Marcelo T. + + + +Author + +Rafael, José A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2023 + +e 2023010 + + +2023-07-07 + + +113 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Bephrata christeri +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 7, 8 +) + + +New record. Bujari (AC) ( +Fig. 8 +). + + + +Material +examined. +Holotype +female ( +USNM +) ((images examined, available at http://n +2t +.net/ark:/65665/3d4292b2f- 46bf-4fef-91ab-00a78a326866) and +2 females +. “ +ECUADOR +, +Napo +, Reserva Etnica Waorani, Transect Ent. +1 km +S. Okone Gare Camp +, +00°39’10”S +76°26’0”W +, + +220 m + +, + +10.II.1995 + +, +T. Erwin +et al +., Canopy fogging, Lot #1009, t8, terre firme forest”; “BRASIL, +AC +, Bujari, FES Antimary, +09°20’01”S +– +68°19’17”W +, Malaise PeQuena, + +21.X-04.XI.2016 + +, EF Morato & JA Rafael, Rede Bia”, +1 female +( +INPA +); same data except + +19.XI-03.XII.2016 + +, +1 female +( +INPA +). + + + +Identification.According to +GATES & HANSON (2009) + +B +. +christeri + +is quite similar to + +B. lorraineae + +, but the latter species usually has more extensive black coloration on the pronotum and the female antennal flagellum is uniformly colored (as opposed to bicolored in + +B. christeri + +). + + +Discussion. + +Bephrata christeri + +has been found previously in +EQuador +, +Colombia +, +Peru +and +Brazil +(AM) ( +GATES & HANSON, 2009 +; +NOYES, 2019 +) and now the species is reported for the first time in +Acre state +, +Brazil +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE66445F86A6FBBEFC8462BD.xml b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE66445F86A6FBBEFC8462BD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b757b279dd3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE66445F86A6FBBEFC8462BD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the parasitic wasps Bephrata (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea, Eurytomidae) in Brazil + + + +Author + +Perioto, Nelson W. + + + +Author + +Fernandes, Daniell R. R. + + + +Author + +Lara, Rogéria I. R. + + + +Author + +Tavares, Marcelo T. + + + +Author + +Rafael, José A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2023 + +e 2023010 + + +2023-07-07 + + +113 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Bephrata cultriformis +( +Ashmead, 1894 +) + + + + + + + +( +Figs 9, 10 +) + + + + + + + +Bephrata cultriformis +ASHMEAD, 1894:146 + + +. + + + + + +Aximogastra cultriformis + +: + +GAHAN, 1951:173 + +. + + + + + +Bephrata cultriformis + +: + + +LOTFALIZADEH +et al. +, 2007:508 + + +. + + + + +Figs 5, 6. + +Bephrata chica +Gates & Hanson, 2009: 5 + +, lateral habitus, female, holotype (modified from http://n2t.net/ark:/65665/m30b51a95d-d90f-4fd3- 9216-f4711473e5fa); 6, distribution map; red circles = previous records. + + + + +Figs 7, 8. + +Bephrata christeri +Gates & Hanson, 2009: 7 + +, lateral habitus, female, holotype (modified from http://n2t.net/ark:/65665/m374c43804-1831- 4ccc-9bd2-c54f54c050ba); 8, distribution map; red circles = previous records, blue circle = new record. + + + + +Figs 9, 10. + +Bephrata cultriformis +( +Ashmead, 1894 +) + +:9, lateral habitus, female; 10; distribution map; red circles = previous records, blue circles = new records. + + + +New records. Senador Guiomard (AC) and Manaus (AM) ( +Fig. 10 +). + + + + + +Material +examined. +3 females +. “ +BRASIL +, +AC +, Senador Guiomard, Faz. Exp. Catuaba ( +UFAC +), +10°04’28”S +– +67°37’00”W +, Malaise, + +01-15.IV.2017 + +, EF Morato & JA Rafael, Rede Bia”, +1 female +( +INPA +); same data except + +14-30.X.2016 + +, +1 female +( +INPA +); “ +BRASIL +, +AM +, Manaus, Reserva Ducke, +5°12’56.4”S +/ +61°50’22.6”O +(?? certainly wrong coordinates)”, + +09.iii.2008 + +, +Amat E. Leg +, Malaise T. firme”, +1 female +( +INPA +) + +. + + +Identification.According to +GATES & HANSON (2009) + +B +. +cultriformis + +is one of the species in the genus that lack the distinctive groove on the procoxae and could therefore be misidentified as + +Isosomodes +Ashmead, 1888 + +( +Eurytomidae +: +Eurytominae +). +GATES & HANSON (2009) +in Table I provided features that allow safe separation between + +Bephrata + +and + +Isosomodes + +. + + +Discussion. + +Bephrata cultriformis + +was previously found in +Mexico +, +Costa Rica +, +Dominica +, St Vincent & +Grenadines +, +Venezuela +, +Ecuador +and +Peru +( +GATES & HANSON, 2009 +; +NOYES, 2019 +). Now it is reported for the first time for +Brazil +in Amazon rainforest area in the +Acre +and Amazonas states. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE67445886ACFD02FE5E65F0.xml b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE67445886ACFD02FE5E65F0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4b647fcd4dd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE67445886ACFD02FE5E65F0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the parasitic wasps Bephrata (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea, Eurytomidae) in Brazil + + + +Author + +Perioto, Nelson W. + + + +Author + +Fernandes, Daniell R. R. + + + +Author + +Lara, Rogéria I. R. + + + +Author + +Tavares, Marcelo T. + + + +Author + +Rafael, José A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2023 + +e 2023010 + + +2023-07-07 + + +113 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Bephrata bouceki +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 3, 4 +) + + +New records. Careiro Castanho and Ipixuna (AM), and Porto Velho (RO) ( +Fig. 4 +). + + + +Material +examined. +4 females +. “ +BRAZIL +, Amazonas, Careiro Castanho, +BR 319 +, Km 181, Sítio +SÃo Paulo +, +04°12’48”S +– +60°49’04”W +, + +12-27.V.2017 + +, Suspensa + +20m + +, +J. A. Rafael +& +F. F. Xavier. Rede Bia +”, +1 female +( +INPA +); “ +BRAZIL +, Amazonas, Ipixuna, Rio Gregório, Com. Lago Grande, +07°10’11,7”S +– +70°49’10,3”W +, + +18-23.V.2011 + +, varredura, +J. A. Rafael +, +R. F. Câmara +, +R. F. Silva +, +A. Somavilla +, +R.Ale-Rocha +”, +2 females +( +INPA +); “BRASIL, +RO +, Porto Velho, +BR +364 km +8,5, armadilha Malaise, + +4/I/2006 + +, +Mugrabi, P.F. +, col.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #20675 +) + +. + + +Identification.According to +GATES & HANSON (2009) + +Bephrata bouceki + +is recognized for presenting a sinuous groove on anterior surface of procoxa; body nearly entire yellow and metatibia black, at least in part. + + + +Figs 3, 4. + +Bephrata bouceki +Gates & Hanson, 2009: 3 + +, lateral habitus; 4, distribution map; red circles = previous records, blue circle = new record. + + + +Discussion. Only +seven specimens +of + +B. bouceki + +are known, all of them from the Amazon rainforest. + +B. bouceki + +has been found previously in +Colombia +, +EQuador +and +Peru +( +GATES & HANSON, 2009 +; +NOYES, 2019 +). Now it is reported for the first time for +Brazil +, in Amazonas and +Rondônia +states. This new record extends the geographical distribution of + +B. bouceki + +about +1,800 km +to the southeast from the +type +locality at +Sucumbíos +, +EQuador +, +1,200 km +to the southeast from Amazonas, +Colombia +and +800 km +from +Madre de Dios +, +Peru +, the previous records. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE6D445086BEFEAFFE06669D.xml b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE6D445086BEFEAFFE06669D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b126de2f5b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/11/5C/87/115C87B2FE6D445086BEFEAFFE06669D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,312 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the parasitic wasps Bephrata (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea, Eurytomidae) in Brazil + + + +Author + +Perioto, Nelson W. + + + +Author + +Fernandes, Daniell R. R. + + + +Author + +Lara, Rogéria I. R. + + + +Author + +Tavares, Marcelo T. + + + +Author + +Rafael, José A. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2023 + +e 2023010 + + +2023-07-07 + + +113 + + +1 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2023010 +1678-4766 + + + + + + + +Bephrata ticos +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 18, 19 +) + + +New record. Recife (PE) ( +Fig. 19 +). + + + +Examined +material. +1 female +. “ +Brasil +, +PE +, Recife, PQ. dos Dois IrmÃos, +08°00’37”S +34°56’31”W +, varredura veg., + +22/IV/2002 + +, +S.T.P. Amarante +e eQ., cols.”, +1 female +( +LRRP #20709 +) + +. + + + +Figs 18, 19. + +Bephrata ticos +Gates & Hanson, 2009:18 + +, lateral habitus, female; 19, distribution map; red circles = previous records, blue circle = new record. + + + +Key to species of + +Bephrata + +occurring in Brazil + + + +(adapted from +GATES & HANSON, 2009 +) + + + +1. Procoxa without sinuous groove on anterior surface ( +Fig. 20 +); metatibia with shorter apical spur peglike ( +Fig. 22 +); metatarsus with first tarsomere about as long as combined length of remaining tarsomeres ......… + +Bephrata cultriformis + +– Procoxa with sinuous groove on anterior surface ( +Fig 21 +); metatibia with shorter apical pointed spur (similar to longer spur) ( +Fig. 23 +); metatarsus with first tarsomere usually longer than combined length of remaining tarsomeres ............... 2 2(1). Metatibia completely yellow …..................................................................................................... + +Bephrata ruficollis + +– Metatibia brown or black, at least in part …...........................................................................................................…….. 3 3(2). Scutellum mostly yellow or orange yellow (sometimes with a thin, longitudinal, black line in middle).…........…. 4 – Scutellum entirely black ……..............................................................................................................…………………. 6 4(3). Mesopleuron and propodeum black …….........................................................................................................…….. 5 – Mesopleuron and propodeum orange (often black in median cavity)…............................................... + +Bephrata bouceki + +5(4). Center of pronotum with wide black spot; dorsal-posterior part of head entirely black ( +Fig. 24 +) …... + +Bephrata ticos + +– Center of pronotum with narrow, longitudinal black line; dorsal-posterior part of head with yellow area between occiput and ocellar area ( +Fig. 25 +) …....................................................................................................................… + +Bephrata bahiae + +6(3). Gaster extremely narrow and elongate, in female length 6× (or more) maximum height ( +Fig. 26 +), in male at least 3× height; fore wing veins very thin; mesoscutum and scutellum of male with transverse wrinkles, pronotum slightly concave dorsally [Dorsal surface of mesosoma completely black] …............................................................… + +Bephrata leptogaster + +– Gaster less elongate (length no more than 5× maximum height in female) ( +Fig. 27 +); veins thicker; male dorsum lacking above characteristics ....................................................................................................................................................…… 7 7(6). Metacoxa almost entirely yellowish brown ( +Fig. 28 +) [Small, about +4 mm +in length; mesosoma, except sides of pronotum, all black; male scape with apical knob opposite insertion of pedicel] ….................................... + +Bephrata chica + +– Metacoxa completely yellow ( +Fig. 29 +) …....................................................................................................…........……. 8 8(7). Female with pronotum dorsally usually entirely yellow ( +Fig 30 +) (sometimes with some black posteriorly); mesoscutal lobes orange, antenna usually with pale funiculum and darker colored clava; male scape without pronounced apical knob ................................................................................................................................................................. + +Bephrata christeri + +– Female pronotum dorsally with extensive black ( +Fig 31 +), mesoscutal lobes orange or black; antennal flagellum uniformly colored; male scape with prominent apical knob opposite insertion of pedicel …............................… + +Bephrata lorraineae + + + + +Figs 20-25. 20, + +Bephrata cultriformis +( +Ashmead, 1894 +) + +female, anterior surface of procoxa without sinuous groove, indicated by red arrow; 21, + +Bephrata ruficollis +Cameron, 1884 + +, female, anterior surface of procoxa with sinuous groove, indicated by red arrow; 22, + +Bephrata cultriformis +( +Ashmead, 1894 +) + +female, metatibia with shorter apical spur peglike, indicated by red arrow; 23, + +Bephrata ruficollis +Cameron, 1884 + +, female, metatibia with shorter apical pointed spur, indicated by red arrow; 24, + +Bephrata ticos +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + +, female, dorsal-posterior part of head entirely black, indicated by red arrow; 25, + +Bephrata bahiae +( +Ashmead, 1904 +) + +female, dorsal-posterior part of head with yellow area between occiput and ocellar area, indicated by red arrow. + + + + +Figs 26-31. 26, + +Bephrata leptogaster +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + +, female, gaster narrow and elongate, length 6× or more maximum height in female, indicated by red arrow; 27, + +Bephrata christeri +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + +(Holotype) (modified from http://n2t.net/ark:/65665/m374c43804-1831-4ccc- 9bd2-c54f54c050ba), gaster less elongate, no more than 5× maximum height in female, indicated by red arrow; gaster less elongate, no more than 5× maximum height in female, indicated by red arrow; 28, + +Bephrata chica +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + +(Holotype) (modified from http://n2t.net/ark:/65665/ m30b51a95d-d90f-4fd3-9216-f4711473e5fa), female, metacoxa almost entirely yellowish brown colored, indicated by red arrow; metacoxa almost entirely yellowish brown colored, indicated by red arrow; 29, + +Bephrata lorraineae +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + +, female, metacoxa completely yellow, indicated by red arrow; 30, + +Bephrata christeri +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + +(Holotype), pronotum dorsally entirely yellow in female, indicated by red arrow; 31, + +Bephrata lorraineae +Gates & Hanson, 2009 + +, (modified from http://n2t.net/ark:/65665/m34d2c5ccf-363b-4300-a545-56bbbed8c3ed), pronotum dorsally entirely yellow in female, indicated by red arrow; pronotum dorsally with extensive black in female, indicated by red arrow. + + + +Identification. According +GATES & HANSON (2009) + +B +. +ticos + +is recognized for presenting the head yellow except black from scrobe to back of head and a small spot below eye; mesoscutum and mesoscutellum mostly yellow or orange yellow (sometimes with a thin, longitudinal, black line in middle); center of pronotum with wide black spot; mesoscutellum orange (reddish) yellow and procoxa with sinuous groove on anterior surface and metatibia black (dark brown in some specimens here studied), at least in part. + + +Discussion. + +Bephrata ticos + +was previously found in +Costa Rica +( +GATES & HANSON, 2009 +; +NOYES, 2019 +). Now the species is reported for the first time for +Brazil +in Atlantic rainforest area in the state of +Pernambuco +, about +5.800 km +southeast from the +type +locality. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/43/4D/87/434D87B4FFD3FFE9FF59FB5BFE85FB96.xml b/data/43/4D/87/434D87B4FFD3FFE9FF59FB5BFE85FB96.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b1f0d5490b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/43/4D/87/434D87B4FFD3FFE9FF59FB5BFE85FB96.xml @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@ + + + +Two new species of oil-collecting bees of Centris (Melanocentris) from Colombia (Hymenoptera: Apidae) + + + +Author + +Vivallo, Felipe + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2021 + +e 2021019 + + +2021-08-23 + + +111 + + +1 +5 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2021019 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2021019 +1678-4766 +13266470 +BCB08327-5168-4EF6-B1DD-00CB3589A166 + + + + + + + +Centris +( +Melanocentris +) +marinae + +sp. nov. + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +8A980E1F-967B-4D9D-997B- B1B9DB9CAFC6 + + + + + +( +Figs 3, 4 +) + + +Diagnosis. Male: integument and pubescence dark brown, lighter on distal terga and sterna ( +Fig. 3 +). Lower paraocular area and clypeal disc yellow ( +Fig. 3 +). Mandible curved distally, with three teeth of acute apex. Shortest distance between lateral ocellus and compound eye less than half of the diameter of that ocellus ( +Fig. 3 +). F1 slightly shorter than F2+F3+F4 ( +Fig. 3 +). Female: unknown. + + +Description. Male. Measurements (mm): approximate total length: 22.5; head with: 8.7; UID: 2.0; LID: 3.6; mandibular length: 3.2; F1 length: 1.8. Coloration: integument dark brown, almost blackish ( +Figs 3, 4 +). Lower paraocular area and clypeal disc yellow ( +Fig. 3 +). S5, S6 and T5-T7 light brown ( +Fig. 4 +). Wing membranes dark brown with violet/ greenish iridescence ( +Fig. 4 +). Integument and sculpture surface: clypeus with coarse and relatively dense punctation, scattered on disc ( +Fig. 3 +). Surface near the epistomal suture with finer and denser punctures. Labrum with coarse and fine punctures intermixed, denser than on clypeal disc ( +Fig. 3 +). Basal margin with sparser punctation than on the rest of labrum ( +Fig. 3 +). Terga and sterna with narrow smooth distal margin. Terga with fine and very dense punctation, sparser on lateral sides of T1 and coarser and sparser on light brown distal segments. Pubescence: dark brown, darker on hind legs and lighter, almost yellowish brown on distal terga and sterna ( +Figs 3, 4 +). Discs of T2 and T3 with some yellow, long and simple hairs intermixed, almost forming a transversal line on distal half of T3 ( +Fig. 4 +). Structures: mandible curved distally, with three teeth of acute apex ( +Fig. 3 +). Maxillary palpus with four palpomeres.Acetabular carina reaching the base of the third tooth ( +Fig. 3 +). Trimmal angle acute, almost straight. Central area of lower margin of clypeus relatively straight ( +Fig. 4 +). Labrum slightly triangular with rounded lateral margins ( +Fig. 3 +). Shortest distance between clypeus and compound eye less than basal width of F1 ( +Fig. 3 +). Central area of epistomal suture relatively straight ( +Fig. 3 +). Inner orbits of compound eyes converging above ( +Fig. 3 +). Vertex below the upper interocular tangent ( +Fig. 3 +). Shortest distance between lateral ocellus and compound eye less than half of the diameter of that ocellus ( +Fig. 3 +). F1 slightly shorter than F2+F3+F4 ( +Fig. 3 +). + + +Type material. + +Holotype +male with the following information: [white label, printed] +COLOMBIA +: Dept. +Magdalena +Valledupar +[printed] VI-4-7- [handwritten] 1968 [printed]\ [white label, printed] +Borys Malkin Collector +( +MNRJ +)†. + + + + +Type +locality and distribution. +COLOMBIA +, +C +é +sar +: +Valledupar +( +Fig. 5 +) + +. + + +Etymology. This species is dedicated to Mrs. +Marina Carvajal. + + + +Comments. This species is only known from the male +holotype +. +Despite +the information contained in the label referring to the +Department +where this new species was collected ( +Magdalena +), +Valledupar +corresponds to the capital of the +César Department +, which was created from +Magdalena +one year before the specimen studied was collected + +. + + + +Two new species of oil-collecting bees of + +Centris +( +Melanocentris +) + +... V + + + + +Figs 3, 4. + +Centris +( +Melanocentris +) +marinae + +sp. nov. +, holotype male: 1, frontal view (scale bar 2 mm); 2, habitus, lateral view (scale bar 5 mm). + + + +This new species is similar to + +C +. +obsoleta +Lepeletier, 1841 + +. However, they differ by the distance between the lateral ocellus and the inner orbit of the compound eye (approximately equal to the diameter of the ocellus in + +C +. +obsoleta + +; less than half of the diameter of the ocellus in + +C +. +marinae + +sp. nov. +), as well as by the coloration of the pubescence of the mesosoma (yellow and dark brown or blackish in + +C +. +obsoleta + +; completely dark brown in + +C +. +marinae + +sp. nov. +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/BD/07/B9/BD07B955FFD1FFAAB5BFFD33FEABD8B2.xml b/data/BD/07/B9/BD07B955FFD1FFAAB5BFFD33FEABD8B2.xml index 8e31a3ccc8e..e71712475c8 100644 --- a/data/BD/07/B9/BD07B955FFD1FFAAB5BFFD33FEABD8B2.xml +++ b/data/BD/07/B9/BD07B955FFD1FFAAB5BFFD33FEABD8B2.xml @@ -1,54 +1,55 @@ - - - -Redescription of Omophoita octoguttata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and its immature stages, with notes on life history + + + +Redescription of Omophoita octoguttata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and its immature stages, with notes on life history - - -Author + + +Author -Begha, Bruno Pigotrovski +Begha, Bruno Pigotrovski - - -Author + + +Author -Santos, Mateus Henrique +Santos, Mateus Henrique - - -Author + + +Author -Prado, Laura Rocha +Prado, Laura Rocha -text - - -Iheringia, Série Zoologia +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia - -2021 - -e 2021016 + +2021 + +e 2021016 - -2021-08-13 + +2021-08-13 - -111 + +111 - -1 -9 + +1 +9 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2021016 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2021016 -journal article -10.1590/1678-4766e2021016 -1678-4766 +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2021016 +1678-4766 +13266386 @@ -239,7 +240,7 @@ col. (LabGEv) Adult ( -Figs 1–15 +Figs 1–15 ). Diagnosis. Body shape oval; eight pale yellow to light brown maculae almost completely covering the elytra, being six of similar size and shape, and two much narrower, elongated at humeral region; maculae rectangular to rounded. Tegument between maculae dark-brown to black. Head black, with three pale yellow to light brown maculae: one covering most of the vertex and the antennal calli, and two covering the lateral portions of the frontoclypeal region. Ventral area of mesothorax, metathorax, and legs black and covered with short pale hairs. @@ -258,7 +259,7 @@ Females: length 9.00- Head ( -Figs 3, 4 +Figs 3, 4 ). Rounded, black. Vertex at the same level of tegument, with fine punctation. Inconspicuous supraorbital suture, smooth integument. Supraorbital pore with long and erect seta. Eight to ten setae at lateral margin of head macula, near eyes. Twelve setae scattered between antennal insertions. Gena with nearly same width as the eye, bearing several setae. Antennae black, filiform, with eleven antennomeres; scape subcylindrical, antennomere II shorter than @@ -267,11 +268,11 @@ shorter than Mouthparts ( -Figs 5–9 +Figs 5–9 ). Labrum ( -Fig. 5 +Fig. 5 ) with rounded distal margins, central portion emarginated, with ten long setae. Maxilla ( -Fig. 6 +Fig. 6 ) with narrow cardo in the proximal portion, with margins diverging from the center forming a much wider apex; stipe divided in basistipe and dististipe, the former larger and subtriangular, the latter elongated; galea subcylindrical and digitiform lacinia both with dense bristles at apex; maxillary palpus well developed with five palpomeres; III and @@ -281,11 +282,11 @@ the longest, the widest and V greatly reduced. Labium ( -Fig. 7 +Fig. 7 ) with membranous ligula, not well developed, reaching the base of the apical segment. Labial palpus with three segments, with short and transverse palpifer; palpomere II subcylindrical and slightly longer than wide; apical article narrowing to the apex. Subtrapezoid prementum. Mandibles ( -Figs 8, 9 +Figs 8, 9 ) nearly symmetrical, subtriangular, with curved outer margin; left mandible with five apical teeth, only three visible teeth on the outer face, IV and @@ -298,7 +299,7 @@ teeth longer and sharper, while others short and blunt. Well-developed membranou Thorax. Pronotum transverse, width twice the length, lateral margins and angles rounded, with a long seta at each angle; anterior angles extending beyond the head insertion; hypomeral lobe inflated, laterally and ventrally distinct; disk lacking any setae or impression, light pink to orange for live specimens, pale yellow to light brown in dry preserved specimens. Prosternum with the same color as the pronotum; prosternal process relatively narrow, widening apically, rounded at apex. Scutellum black, triangular with rounded vertices; procoxal cavities open. Elytra ( -Figs 1, 2 +Figs 1, 2 ) black with eight pale yellow to light brown maculae, six of which larger, subrectangular with rounded vertices to rounded, and two of which are much narrower, also subrectangular with rounded vertices, located in the humeral region. Epipleura visible laterally in the humeral region. Mesosternum and metasternum black, surface densely covered with pale hairs; metasternum elongated, rectangular; outer margins of the thorax with a higher density of hairs. @@ -307,7 +308,7 @@ Fore and median legs similar, with coxae subcylindrical, slender femur and tibia enlarged, fusiform. Abdomen black, with five ventrites densely covered with pale hairs: ventrites I-IV subeQual in length, pygidium slightly longer than the other ventrites and rounded. - + Figs 1–4. @@ -317,7 +318,7 @@ Figs 1–4. . Dorsal habitus with color pattern variations: 1, female; 2, male. Frontal view of the head: 3, variant with rectangular maculae, female; 4, variant with rounded maculae, male. - + Figs 5–9. @@ -329,44 +330,44 @@ Figs 5–9. Male genitalia ( - + Figs 10 – 12 ). Median lobe with parallel lateral margins ( -Fig. 10 +Fig. 10 ), with base slightly wider than apex, short basal hooks ( BHS ) appearing on the lateral margin near the end of the basal orifice ( BOR , -Fig. 11 +Fig. 11 ), which has a rounded or oval. Apical hood ( APH ) with nearly parallel lateral margins, diverging to half the length of the flap and folding ventrally to form a semicylinder, straight apical margin. Lateral lobes ( LTL , -Fig. 12 +Fig. 12 ) slightly shorter than the projections of the middle lobe ( MDL ) which are nearly parallel, diverging at apex. Female genitalia ( -Figs 13–15 +Figs 13–15 ). Membranous bursa copulatrix . Tignum goblet-shaped ( -Fig. 13 +Fig. 13 ), with a wide, well-sclerotized apex, with converging margins forming a thinner median portion; parallel margins of the median portion then diverging slightly to the base of tignum, less sclerotized and thinner than the apex. Spermatheca ( -Fig. 14 +Fig. 14 ) simple, with areniform and well-sclerotized receptacle ( RCP ); spermathecal duct ( DCT ) long, curled. Vaginal palpi elongated with sigmoid shape ( -Fig. 15 +Fig. 15 ), with a thin base, slightly wider and more sclerotized at the apex, ten setae at the apex. @@ -385,7 +386,7 @@ Redescription of Bet al. - + Figs 10–12. @@ -395,7 +396,7 @@ Figs 10–12. , male genitalia: 10, median lobe, dorsal view; 11, aedeagus, right lateral view; 12, detail of the apical hood of the median lobe, dorsal view (APH, apical hood; BHS, basal hooks; BOR, basal orifice; LTL, lateral lobes; MDL, middle lobe). Scale = 200 µm. - + Figs 13–15. @@ -408,13 +409,13 @@ Figs 13–15. Eggs ( -Fig. 18 +Fig. 18 ). Egg oblong with round ends, one of extremities wider than the other, with an operculum. Fresh eggs opaQue and pale, older eggs orange. Mature larvae ( -Figs 19, 20 +Figs 19, 20 ). Larvae eruciform, with many scoli dorsal and laterally, each scolus with two setae. Cephalic capsule black, lacking stemmata. Body reddened orange with hairs organized in punctuations at the sides, ventral area and dorsal area. Younger instars pale, smaller with slightly longer scoli, older instars larger and more reddened. In alcohol, specimens are yellow. Chaetotaxy constant through all instars, with no noticeable difference between older and younger instars; younger instars with longer setae. @@ -426,7 +427,7 @@ Length Description. Cephalic capsule ( -Fig. 19 +Fig. 19 ) black, slightly inserted in the thorax; frons, clypeus, labrum, and mandibles black; stemmata absent. Endocarina inconspicuous. Epicranial suture inconspicuous, only the frontal sutures visible, reaching the top of the head capsule, which is partially covered by pronotum. Setae present: four dorsoepicranial (DOS); four paraocellar (POS); two posterofrontal (PFS); two externofrontal (EFS); two anterofrontal (AFS); four externoepicranial (EES).Antennae with three articles, short; antennomere I subtrapezoidal, rounded; antennomeres II and III smaller, conical; antennomere III the smallest. Clypeus lacking setae, subtrapezoid, with a median recess. Labrum horizontally oval, with four setae. Both maxillary and labial palps with four segments. Front legs slightly shorter than middle and hind legs. All legs with four setae at apex of the femur and four at tibia. Claws simple, curved and hook-like. @@ -434,9 +435,9 @@ Description. Cephalic capsule ( Pupa ( -Figs 21–24 +Figs 21–24 ). Body shape oval, exarate, adecticous, exarate, pale yellow. Tegument with sparse black setae. Found within cocoons made of dirt and saliva, buried in the soil ( -Figs 23, 24 +Figs 23, 24 ). Mature pupae with eyes, mandibles, metafemoral spring and claws darkened, sclerotized. @@ -460,7 +461,7 @@ Redescription of Bet al. - + Figs 16–18. @@ -470,7 +471,7 @@ Figs 16–18. : 16, terrarium used for the rearing; 17, clutch of eggs buried in soil within the terrarium;18, egg. Scale = 1 mm. - + Figs 19, 20. @@ -482,9 +483,9 @@ Figs 19, 20. Description. Head not visible from above, bearing two setae on the eyes, two setae on the frons and two setae on the vertex. Pronotum wider at the base, bearing 16 setae, eight in the median region and eight in the lateral region; one pair of spiracles visible in lateral view. Elytral and hind wing thecae closely appressed, curved ventrally around the body. Mesonotum and metanotum with four setae.All femora with three setae at apex. Abdomen with five pairs of spiracles, visible in dorsal view ( -Fig. 21 +Fig. 21 ); abdominal segments I-VII with six setae; abdominal segment IX with two spine-like urogomphi ( -Fig. 22 +Fig. 22 ). diff --git a/data/D7/69/87/D76987A0FFCCF372FEC4E7F286BDF80B.xml b/data/D7/69/87/D76987A0FFCCF372FEC4E7F286BDF80B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..02773c7dc7a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/D7/69/87/D76987A0FFCCF372FEC4E7F286BDF80B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,411 @@ + + + +First record of the tarantula genus Bumba (Araneae: Theraphosidae) from Bolivia, with the description of a new species + + + +Author + +Ferretti, Nelson E. + +text + + +Iheringia, Série Zoologia + + +2021 + +e 2021025 + + +2021-10-29 + + +111 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2021025 + +journal article +10.1590/1678-4766e2021025 +1678-4766 +13266460 + + + + + + + +Bumba paunaka + +sp. nov. + + + + + +urn:lsid:Zoobank.org:pub: +1D0D4F27-CC34-45C0-B191- 4CFBCC060E11 + + + + + +( +Figs 1–22 +, +Tabs I +, II) + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♂ +, +BOLIVIA +, +Santa CruZ +: +San Miguel de Velasco +( +16°41ʼ54.96”S +, +60°58’5.16”W +, + +493m + +), + +21.VII.2014 + +, +L. López +& +G. Zalazar +col. (CAI 3500) + +. + +Paratype +♀ +, +BOLIVIA +, +La PaZ +: +San LorenZo +, +12 km +from +Caranavi +, + +1-2.I.1991 + +, +Goloboff +, +Santisteban +& +Mc Hugh +col. (AMNH) + +. + + +Etymology. Noun in apposition that refers to the name of the language from the Chiquitania region of +Bolivia +, near to the department of +Santa Cruz +, where this new species was found. + + +Diagnosis. + +Bumba paunaka + +sp. nov. +resembles + +B. cuiaba + +due to the black longitudinal band on dorsal abdomen, more noticeable in male ( +Figs 2, 4 +, +20 +), however, it is much wider in + +B. paunaka + +sp. nov. +than in + +B. cuiaba + +. In addition, the male differs from + +B. cuiaba + +by the longer and slender embolus ( +Figs 7-12 +) and the subapical spine of the retrolateral branch of tibial apophysis being thinner and longer ( +Fig. 6 +). Male of + +B. paunaka + +sp. nov. +resembles those of + +B. mineiros + +and + +B. rondonia + +by the palpal bulb with a long and thin embolus with weakly developed keels, but it can be distinguished by the absence of a tooth on PI. Additionally, female of + +B. paunaka + +sp. nov. +can be distinguished from all other species by the spermathecae with circular lobed seminal receptacles with very short necks ( +Fig. 21 +). + + +Description, +holotype +male. Color in alcohol: carapace and legs brown with long golden hairs mainly on carapace margin ( +Fig. 1 +). Abdomen light brown with a median dorsal wide black band ( +Figs 2, 4 +). Total length 20.2. Carapace 9.1 long, 7.9 wide. Abdomen 10.3 long, 6.5 wide. Fovea deep procurved, 1.8 wide ( +Fig. 1 +). Eye tubercle: 1.1 long, 1.5 wide. Clypeus narrow, 0.4. Anterior row of eyes procurve, posterior recurve ( +Fig. 5 +). Eyes sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.36, ALE 0.38, PME 0.19, PLE 0.27, AME-AME 0.18, AME-ALE 0.15, PME-PME 0.67, PME-PLE 0.08, ALE-PLE 0.17. Labium: 0.7 long, 1.2 wide, with 23 cuspules ( +Fig. 3 +). Sternum 3.7 long, 3.1 wide. Cheliceral furrow with 10 large teeth on promargin and a group of 12 smaller basal teeth on retromargin. Maxillae with +ca +. 109 cuspules on each side ( +Fig. 3 +). Length of legs and palpal segments in the +Tab. I +. Spination: all femora and tarsi without spines. Patellae: palp 1 P; I 1 P; II 1 P; III-IV 0. Tibiae: palp 1-2 P; I 1-1-1 P, 1 V, 2-1-1 R; II 1-1-1 P, 2-1-2 V, 2-1-2 R; III 2-2-1-2 P, 2-1-2 V, 1-1-1 R; IV 2-1-2-1 P, 1-1-2 V, 1-1-1- 1-2 R. Metatarsi: I 1-1 P, 1 V; II 1-1-1 P, 1-1-1 V, 1 R; III 1-1-1-2 P, 2-2 V, 1-1-2 R; IV 1-2-1-2 P, 2-2-1-2 V. Scopulae: Tarsi I–IV densely scopulate, with lines of strong setae on longitudinal divisions increasing in wide from legs I to IV. Metatarsus I scopulate on distal half, II on distal third, III on distal fourth and IV only apical, distal fifth. Tibia I with two tibial apophysis originating from a common base, the retrolateral branch with a long and slender subapical spine and a shorter and strong spine on the inner side, and a long and strong spine on the retrolateral side of the prolateral shorter branch ( +Fig. 6 +). Metatarsus of leg I flexes between both branches of tibial apophysis, touching their medial portion. Palpal tibia with ventral excavation and a slightly developed retrolateral process ( +Figs. 13-15 +). Male palpal bulb with long embolus, longer than tegulum, PI and PS very weakly developed, almost inconspicuous, eXtending close together from the basal embolus to the apical end ( +Figs. 7-12 +). Urticating setae type III and IV present. Spinnerets: PMS, 0.3 long; PLS, 0.4 basal, 0.3 middle, 0.5 domed distal. + + + +Paratype +female. +Color +in alcohol: same as in male, eXcepting the dorsal wide black band also eXtends to the lateral on proximal abdomen. ( +Figs 19-20 +). +Total +length 25.91. +Carapace +12.48 long,10.99 wide. +Abdomen +13.43 long, 9.05 wide. +Fovea +deep slightly procurved, 2.23 wide ( +Fig. 16 +). +Eye +tubercle:1.24 long, 1.92 wide. +Clypeus +narrow, 0.43. +Anterior +row of eyes slightly procurve, posterior recurve ( +Fig. 17 +). +Eyes +sizes and inter-distances: +AME +0.24, +ALE +0.54, +PME +0.25, +PLE +0.46, AME-AME 0.31, AME-ALE 0.19, PME-PME 0.84, PME-PLE 0.07, ALE-PLE 0.21. +Labium +1.18 long, 1.61 wide, with 149 cuspules ( +Fig. 18 +). +Sternum +4.99 long, 4.72 wide. +Cheliceral +furrow with 9 large teeth and 1 small on promargin and a group of 24 smaller basal teeth on retromargin. +Maxillae +with +ca +. 225 cuspules on each side ( +Fig. 18 +). +Length +of legs and palpal segments in the +Tab. II +. +Tarsi +I-IV fully scopulated and complete. +Tarsus IV +with 5 lines of long setae. +Metatarsus I +fully scopulated, II 3/4 apical scopulated, III 1/2 apical scopulated, IV 1/4 apical scopulated. +Spination +: femora: palp and legs I-IV, 0. +Patellae +: palp and legs I-IV, 0. +Tibiae +: palp 1-1V, 2-2 +R +; +I 1 +P, 1-1V; II 1-2P, 1-2V; III 1-1-1P, 1-1V, 1-1 +R +; +IV 2-3 +V, 1-1-1 +R +. +Metatarsi +: I 3(ap)V; II 1-1V; III 1-1-1P, 2-2-2V, 1-1 +R +; +IV 1-2 +- +1 +P, 1-1-1-1-3V, 1-1-1 +R +. Tarsi of palp and legs I-IV, 0. Spermathecae with circular lobed seminal receptacles with very short necks ( +Fig. 21 +). Urticating setae type III and IV present. Spinnerets: +PMS +, 1.43 long; +PLS +, 2.03 basal, 1.84 middle, 2.56 domed distal + +. + + + +Figs 1-6. + +Bumba paunaka + +sp. nov. +, holotype male: 1, carapace, dorsal view; 2, abdomen, dorsal view; 3, labium, sternum and maxillae; 4, abdomen, lateral view; 5, eyes, dorsal view; 6, tibial apophysis, proventral view; PB, prolateral branch; RB, retrolateral branch. Green arrows indicate the subapical spines on the retrolateral branch of tibial apophysis. Scale bars =1mm. + + + + +Figs 7-15. + +Bumba paunaka + +sp. nov. +, holotype male, bulb: 7, retrolateral view; 8, ventral view; 9, dorsal view; 10, prolateral view; 11, detail of palpal bulb embolus at prolateral view; 12, detail of palpal bulb embolus at dorsal view. Palpal tibia and cymbium: 13, ventral view (green arrow indicates the retrolateral process); 14, prolateral view; 15, retrolateral view (Cy, cymbium; PI, prolateral inferior keel; PS, prolateral superior keel; Rp, retrolateral process; Ti, tibia). Scale bars = 1 mm. + + + +Remarks. In order to assure that the specimens are conspecific, I relied on the morphological general aspect such as the body size and more importantly the coloration pattern and the presence of the dark band at dorsal abdomen, since it seems to be a diagnostic character that is present in just two species ( + +B. cuiaba + +and + +B. paunaka + +sp. nov. +), which is wider in specimens of + +B. paunaka + +sp. nov. +In addition, although the geographic distance that exists between the specimens eXamined is considerable (about +700 km +in straight line), particularly, they both inhabit the Southwest Amazon moist forest ecorregion, which are characterized by Amazonian areas of low lands extended in the north and northeastern +Bolivia +and along the Andean foothills reaching +Santa Cruz de la Sierra +(with altitudes about +500-600 m +in +La Paz +and +Beni +departments; and +300-400 in +Cochabamba +and +Santa Cruz +departments) ( + +OLSON +et al +., 2001 + +; + +HERZOG +et al +., 2005 + +). The +paratype +female presents an abnormal lateral expansion of the abdomen and under a close examination of the area, a small oval scar largely sclerotized was observed ( +Fig. 19 +). This could be the result of an injury caused by the penetration of a parasitoid +Acroceridae +( +Diptera +) larvae into the body of the spider, which searches for the soft tissues like the abdomen or the articulations (BARNECHE +et al +., 2013; GABELLONE +et al +., 2020). Unfortunately, the impossibility to dissect the abdomen of the female due to the designation as +paratype +and being the only individual do not allow making a further confirmation of this observation. + + + +Figs 16-21. + +Bumba paunaka + +sp. nov. +, paratype female: 16, carapace, dorsal view; 17, eyes, dorsal view; 18, labium and maxillae. Abdomen: 19, dorsal view; 20, lateral view; 21, spermathecae, dorsal view. Green arrow indicates an oval small scar and a lateral abnormal expansion of the abdomen. Scale bars = 1 mm. + + + +Distribution. Central +Bolivia +, at the departments of +La Paz +and +Santa Cruz +( +Fig. 21 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file