From 40324600274b46e29c7d3065b4691a97db53b8b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ggserver Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:53:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add updates up until 2024-07-15 13:47:43 --- .../AA/03ABAA2EFFCBFFDCFF7EB22E1BE8E94D.xml | 447 +++++++++++++ .../AA/03ABAA2EFFCBFFDFFF7EB59C1BE9E8E3.xml | 311 +++++++++ .../AA/03ABAA2EFFDEFFCCFF7EB7541CC5EC36.xml | 596 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 1354 insertions(+) create mode 100644 data/03/AB/AA/03ABAA2EFFCBFFDCFF7EB22E1BE8E94D.xml create mode 100644 data/03/AB/AA/03ABAA2EFFCBFFDFFF7EB59C1BE9E8E3.xml create mode 100644 data/03/AB/AA/03ABAA2EFFDEFFCCFF7EB7541CC5EC36.xml diff --git a/data/03/AB/AA/03ABAA2EFFCBFFDCFF7EB22E1BE8E94D.xml b/data/03/AB/AA/03ABAA2EFFCBFFDCFF7EB22E1BE8E94D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bb604327129 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/AB/AA/03ABAA2EFFCBFFDCFF7EB22E1BE8E94D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,447 @@ + + + +Notes on Iberian Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) part I: a new species, new records and some taxonomic and faunistic remarks + + + +Author + +Parejo-Pulido, Daniel +Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo, 12, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain. + + + +Author + +Romano, Marcello +Piazza A. Cataldo, 10, I 90040 Capaci (PA), Italy. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-11 + + +5477 + + +5 + + +501 +536 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5477.5.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5477.5.1 +1175-5326 +12733366 +DBB3BBAE-1626-4F36-BBDC-A9B4E0832E18 + + + + + + +Key to the males of + +Smicromyrme + +of the Iberian Peninsula + + + + + + +(unknown for +S. ceballosi Suárez, 1959 +and + +S. suarezi +Matias, 2024 + +) + + +Modified from +Matias (2023a) +. + +Smicromyrme pusillus +( +Klug, 1835 +) + +is not included in the key as its taxonomic status is currently being revised (Matias +in press +.) + + + + + + +1. +Mandibles lacking the marked tooth on their outer margin..................................................... +2 + + + + +- +Mandibles with an evident tooth on their outer margin........................................................ +5 + + + + + + +2. +Radial vein with notable thickening...................................................................... +3 + + + + +- +Radial vein without notable thickening.................................................................... +4 + + + + + + +3. +Mesosoma with red propodeum...................................................................................... + +S. suberratus +Invrea, 1957 + +(the taxonomic status of this species is currently being revised, see Matias +in press +) + + + + +- +Mesosoma with black propodeum.................................................. + +S. opistomelas +Invrea, 1950 + + + + + + + +4. +T3 with band of dense white-silvery setae.......................................... + +S. matritensis +( +Mercet, 1905 +) + + + + + +- +T3 without band of dense white-silvery setae, at most with distal fringe................... + +S. inermus +( +Schwartz, 1984 +) + + + + + + + +5. +Radial vein with notable thickening...................................................................... +6 + + + + +- +Radial vein without notable thickening.................................................................... +7 + + + + + + +6. +T3 with band of dense white-silvery setae.............................................. + +S. merceti +( +André, 1903 +) + + + + + +- +T3 without band of dense white-silvery setae, at most with distal fringe...................... + +S. dusmeti +( +Mercet, 1905 +) + + + + + + + +7. +T3 with band of dense white-silvery setae................................................................. +8 + + + + +- +Metasoma without band of dense white-silvery setae at most distal fringe....................................... +15 + + + + + + +8. +T4 with mostly dark setae........................................................... + +S. andradei +Suárez, 1954 + + + + + +- +T4 with band of dense white-silvery setae................................................................. +9 + + + + + + +9. +Mandibles bidentate.................................................................................. +10 + + + + +- +Mandibles tridentate................................................................................. +11 + + + + + + +10. +Clypeus with anterior border approximately straight.................................. + +S. metanotalis +(André, 1902) + + + + + +- +Clypeus with anterior border bilobulated............................................... + +S. sulcisius +Invrea, 1955 + + + + + + + +11. +Clypeus with anterior border weakly upturned forming divergent anterolateral tubercles separated medially by weakly concave notch. T2 with apical broad band, medially as broad as band on T3–4................. + +S. plantourianus +Schwartz, 1986 + + + + + +- +Clypeus with anterior border with two forward-facing tubercles separated by medial concave depression. T2 with narrow apical band, often medially emarginated....................................................................... +12 + + + + + + +12. +Mesoscutum dark brownish-red to ferruginous-red, concolourous with pronotum, scutellum, metanotum and propodeum (some areas may be slightly darkened)........................................... + +S. partitus +( +Klug, 1835 +) + +[typical form] + + + + +- +Mesoscutum black................................................................................... +13 + + + + + + +13. +Mesosoma red except black mesoscutum......................................... + +S. fasciaticollis +( +Spinola, 1843 +) + + + + + +- +Mesoscutum and pronotum black....................................................................... +14 + + + + + + +14. +Mesosoma black, except red propodeum..................................... + +S. partitus propodealis +Suárez, 1959 + + + + + +- +Mesosoma black ….................................................... + +S. partitus obscurithorax +(André, 1902) + + + + + + + +15. +Mandibles tridentate................................................................................. +16 + + + + +- +Mandibles bidentate.................................................................................. +17 + + + + + + +16. +Mandibles tridentate with three apical teeth......................................... + +S. sicanus +( +De Stefani, 1887 +) + + + + + +- +Mandibles tridentate, with two apical teeth and a third one broad and rounded medially in the inner border............................................................................................. + +S. ferdinandi +Invrea, 1953 + + + + + + + +17. +Clypeus with distinct medial longitudinal carina, connected with two preapical tubercles........................................................................... ‘complex + + +S. rufipes + +’ + +[sensu +Schmid-Egger & Schmidt 2021 +, +2022 +] + + + + +- +Clypeus with distally reduced medial longitudinal carina, not connected with two preapical tubercles............................................................................................... + +S. ruficollis +( +Fabricius, 1793 +) + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/AB/AA/03ABAA2EFFCBFFDFFF7EB59C1BE9E8E3.xml b/data/03/AB/AA/03ABAA2EFFCBFFDFFF7EB59C1BE9E8E3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..423a852d5ab --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/AB/AA/03ABAA2EFFCBFFDFFF7EB59C1BE9E8E3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ + + + +Notes on Iberian Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) part I: a new species, new records and some taxonomic and faunistic remarks + + + +Author + +Parejo-Pulido, Daniel +Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo, 12, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain. + + + +Author + +Romano, Marcello +Piazza A. Cataldo, 10, I 90040 Capaci (PA), Italy. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-11 + + +5477 + + +5 + + +501 +536 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5477.5.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5477.5.1 +1175-5326 +12733366 +DBB3BBAE-1626-4F36-BBDC-A9B4E0832E18 + + + + + + +Key to the males of + +Physetopoda + +of the Iberian Peninsula + + + + + + +[unknown for + +Ph. romanoi +Lo Cascio & Grita, 2010 + +, + +Ph. unicincta +( +Lucas, 1848 +) + +and + +Ph. sericeiceps +( +André, 1901 +) + +]. Modified from +Pagliano & Agnoli (2018) +and +Pagliano (2021) +. + + + + + + +1. +Body only with black pubescence, without traces of white-silvery setae.................. + +Ph. punctata +( +Latreille, 1792 +) + + + + + +- +At least the metasoma is partially with white-silvery setae.................................................... +2 + + + + + + +2. +Ocelli conspicuously large, diameter of anterior ocellus larger than OL; OOL about equal to diameter of ocellus......... +3 + + + + +- +Ocelli smaller, diameter of anterior ocellus smaller than OL; OOL larger than diameter of ocellus..................... +7 + + + + + + +3. +Clypeus with an evident medial longitudinal carina.......................................................... +4 + + + + +- +Clypeus with a vague medial longitudinal carina............................................................. +5 + + + + + + +4. +Mesosoma mostly red............................................................. + +Ph. lucasii +( +Smith, 1855 +) + +. + + + + +- +Mesosoma largely black, with tegulae and scutellum red................... + +Ph. lucasii pseudobimaculata +(Suárez, 1959) + + + + + + + +5. +Preapical tubercles of the clypeus small, non-protruding beyond the head (dorsal view)................................................................................................. + +Ph. daghestanica +( +Radoszkowski, 1885 +) + + + + + +- +Preapical tubercles of the clypeus evident, very visible and large, protruding beyond the head (dorsal view)............. +6 + + + + + + +6. +Preapical tubercles of the clypeus larger and more protruding beyond the head (dorsal view). Propodeum elongated; T2 about 1.2–1.3 times wider than long................................................... + +Ph. mendizabali +( +Suárez, 1956 +) + + + + + +- +Preapical tubercles of the clypeus smaller and less protruding beyond the head (dorsal view). Propodeum truncated; T2 about 1.5 times wider than long....................................................... + +Ph. halensis +( +Fabricius, 1787 +) + + + + + + + +7. +T3 with a band of dense white-silvery setae.......................................... + +Ph. nuptura +( +Mercet, 1905 +) + + + + + +- +Metasoma without bands of dense white-silvery setae, at most with distal fringes on the terga........................ +8 + + + + + + +8. +Clypeus with evident and very visible preapical tubercles..................................................... +9 + + + + +- +Clypeus with small preapical tubercles................................................................... +10 + + + + + + +9. +Clypeus with basal part striated. Larger eyes than the following species, ratio between eye length and OOL 2.1–2.6; eye length and eye-anterior ocellus distance: 1.1–1.3. Vosella long, with almost parallel sides, inner side with interrupted row, basal part with short dense setae, apical part with sparse long setae................................ + +Ph. ligustica +( +Invrea, 1951 +) + + + + + +- +Clypeus with basal part sparsely punctated. Smaller eyes than the previous species, ratio between eye length and OOL: 1.2– 1.4; eye length and eye-anterior ocellus distance: 1.0. Volsella short, curved and narrower at the apex., inner side with noninterrupted row, setae progressively longer apically...................... + +Ph. fresnoi +Romano & Parejo-Pulido + + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + +10. +Clypeus with medial longitudinal carina ending in two preapical tubercles. Basivolsellar setae remarkably much protruding beyond volsellar cuspis in lateral view......................................... + +Ph. rufosquamulata +( +André, 1903 +) + + + + + +- +Clypeus with medial longitudinal carina that widens distally to form an inverted Y-shaped elevated in the middle and two preapical tubercles. Basivolsellar setae not longer than volsellar cuspis in lateral view...... + +Ph. scutellaris +( +Latreille, 1792 +) + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/AB/AA/03ABAA2EFFDEFFCCFF7EB7541CC5EC36.xml b/data/03/AB/AA/03ABAA2EFFDEFFCCFF7EB7541CC5EC36.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cc9c90c4d4b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/AB/AA/03ABAA2EFFDEFFCCFF7EB7541CC5EC36.xml @@ -0,0 +1,596 @@ + + + +Notes on Iberian Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) part I: a new species, new records and some taxonomic and faunistic remarks + + + +Author + +Parejo-Pulido, Daniel +Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo, 12, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain. + + + +Author + +Romano, Marcello +Piazza A. Cataldo, 10, I 90040 Capaci (PA), Italy. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-11 + + +5477 + + +5 + + +501 +536 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5477.5.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5477.5.1 +1175-5326 +12733366 +DBB3BBAE-1626-4F36-BBDC-A9B4E0832E18 + + + + + + + +Physetopoda fresnoi +Romano & Parejo-Pulido + +, +sp. nov. + + + + +https://zoobank.org/ + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +BE6E273D-1DB6-4A2B-941A-EC2952D64BE9 + + + + + +( +Figs 2–6 +) + + + + +Diagnosis. +Males of + +Ph. fresnoi + +can be recognized by the following combination of characters: slender appearance; apical fringes of silvery pubescence on T2–3; felt line on lateral T2; mandibles tridentate with an external tooth beneath; clypeus almost shiny (with sparse punctuation limited to basal parts), with two well-developed tubercles on the anterior border; a basal external lobe of volsella with long and curly ventral hairs longer than the length of the volsella; and inner side of volsella covered with short setae that progressively lengthen towards apex, where some long curved hairs are present. Female is unknown. + + + + +Description. +Holotype +, +♂ +. Body length 9.0 mm. + + +Colouration. +Body entirely black except for tegulae which are reddish-yellow, the preapical part of mandibles which are reddish-brown and flagellomeres which are castaneous beneath. Legs dark brown ( +Fig. 2A–B +). + + +Pubescence. +Long, erect and suberect, white-silvery setae covering head including mandibles and scape, pronotum, scutellum, metanotum and metasoma. Mesonotum and disc of T2 with short, appressed and backward brown pubescence ( +Fig. 2A–B +). Tegulae with sparse long recumbent black setae ( +Fig. 6D +). T2–3 with apical fringes of white-silvery setae ( +Fig. 2A +). Felt line yellowish, long, 0.5 times lateral length of T2 ( +Fig. 4D +). + + +Shape, punctuation and structure. +Head 1.3 times wider than long, equal to pronotal width, with more or less parallel sides and with occipital margin slightly rounded. Frons, vertex and gena with large, dense and confluent punctures. Vertex posteriorly to interocellar area with sparser punctures. ( +Fig. 3A +). GOI = 1.1. Mandibles tridentate ( +Fig. 3B +), with a large tooth beneath near the base ( +Fig. 3D +), its height (lateral view) less than the minimum distance between emargination and upper mandibular carina ( +Fig. 3C +). Clypeus flat with two clearly visible tubercles on the anterior border and basal medial carina; clypeal surface impunctate and shiny ( +Fig. 3B +). Eyes slightly projecting from the head profile. Inner eye margin with a deep notch. Distance between posterior eye line and posterior headline equal to eye length. Ocelli small ( +Fig. 3A +), diameter of anterior ocellus much smaller than the distance between it and posterior one. POL/OOL = 1.1; OL:MOD:LOD = 1.0:0.6:0.6. First flagellomere length 0.8 times flagellomere 2. F2–11 almost the same in width. Ratio of mesosoma to metasoma length is 0.8. Pronotum with large deep dense punctures, anteriorly almost straight, with divergent posteriorly lateral sides, slightly wider than mesonotum ( +Fig. 6C +). Mesoscutum densely punctate, with notauli developed and not touching anterior bord. Tegulae rounded posteriorly, 1.4 times longer than wide, protruding beyond mesoscuto-scutellar suture with uniform and large punctures except the outer margin of posterior 3/4 glabrous and smooth ( +Fig. 6D +). Wings infuscate, veins brown ( +Fig. 6E +). Propodeum elongate ( +Fig. 6A–B +), reticulate with large cells, with small median dorsal longitudinal cells ( +Fig. 6B +). T1 campanuliform, apical width 1.8 times its medial length, with distinct dorsal surface, densely punctate ( +Fig. 4D +). T2 evenly convex; dorsal T2 1.4 times wider than long. Disc of T2 with distance between punctures two or more times puncture diameter ( +Fig. 4A +). S2 strongly and coarsely punctate ( +Fig. 4B +). S3–7 subapically punctate, S8 densely punctate ( +Fig. 4C +). Genitalia is shown in +Fig. 5 +. Basal external lobe of volsella with long and curly ventral hairs. + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Physetopoda fresnoi +Romano & Parejo-Pulido + + +sp. nov. +, + +habitus. +A, B +holotype; +C +paratype [MNCN_Ent 338957]. + + + + +FIGURE 3. + +Physetopoda fresnoi +Romano & Parejo-Pulido + + +sp. nov. + +, holotype, head. A dorsal view; B frontal view; C lateral view; D ventral view. + + + +Female. +Unknown. + + + + +Type material. + +SPAIN +. +Holotype +, +♂ +, +Arévalo +, +Ávila +/ R-8TMB / 16- + +30.06.2006 + +/ +Gayubo +et al. +leg. / ex. +Colección F. Fresno +[ +MNCN +_ +Ent +339494] + +. + +Paratypes +: +1♂ +, +Arévalo +, +Ávila +/ R-8TMB / 16- + +30.06.2006 + +/ +Gayubo +et al. +leg. / ex. +Colección F. Fresno +[ +MNCN +_ +Ent +339493] + +; + +1♂ +, +Arévalo +, +Ávila +/ +Liborio +TMB / 16- + +30.06.2006 + +/ +Gayubo +et al. +leg. / ex. +Colección F. Fresno +[ +MNCN +_ +Ent +339495] + +; + +1♂ +, +Cilloruelo +, +Salamanca +/ + +21-VI-2012 + +/ +F. Fresno +leg. / ex. +Colección F. Fresno +[ +MNCN +_ +Ent +339496] + +; + +1♂ +, +Pozoblanco +, +Córdoba +/ + +20.VII.1972 + +/ +Colección J. Suárez +[ +MNCN +_ +Ent +338957] + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Spain +. + + +Iberian distribution. +Ávila, Córdoba, Salamanca. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is dedicated to the +type +collector, Fernando Fresno, who kindly donated his private collections to the MNCN, giving us the opportunity to study very diverse and interesting material and to which most records in this work belong. + + + + +FIGURE 4. + +Physetopoda fresnoi +Romano & Parejo-Pulido + + +sp. nov. + +, holotype, metasoma. +A +T2; +B +S2; +C +ventral view; +D +lateral view. + + + + +FIGURE 5. + +Physetopoda fresnoi +Romano & Parejo-Pulido + + +sp. nov. + +, paratype [MNCN_Ent 338957], genitalia. + + + + +FIGURE 6. + +Physetopoda fresnoi Romano & Parejo-Pulido + + +sp. nov. + +A, D paratype [MNCN_Ent 339495]. B, C, E holotype. A mesosoma, lateral view; B propodeum, dorsal view; C pronotum and mesonotum, dorsal view; D tegula, dorsal view; E fore wing. + + + + +Remarks, variability and comparisons +. + + +Variability +. Body length ranges from 4.7–9.0 mm (N = 4). Colouration of mesosoma varies from totally black except red tegulae to completely red except postscutellum and apical part of propodeum ( +Fig. 2C +). Head can be more rectangular, varying from 1.3 to 1.5 (N = 4) times wider than long. Ocelli also vary in size: POL/OOL = 0.9–1.2; OL:MOD:LOD = 1.0:0.4–0.7:0.4–0.6; N = 4. Ratio between T2 width and length ranged from 1.3 to 1.4 (N = 4). + + +Comparisons +. See key to males + +Physetopoda + +below. + +Ph. fresnoi + +differs from other Iberian + +Physetopoda + +by having apical fringes of white-silvery pubescence on T2–3 [ + +Ph. punctata +( +Latreille, 1792 +) + +, + +Ph. nuptura +( +Mercet, 1905 +) + +], small-sized ocelli [ + +Ph. halensis +( +Fabricius, 1787 +) + +, + +Ph. lucasii +( +Smith, 1855 +) + +, + +Ph. daghestanica +( +Radoszkowski, 1885 +) + +, + +Ph. mendizabali +( +Suárez, 1956 +) + +] and two well-developed tubercles on the anterior border of the clypeus [ + +Ph. scutellaris +( +Latreille, 1792 +) + +, + +Ph. rufosquamulata +( +André, 1903 +) + +]. The only comparable Iberian species is + +Ph. ligustica +( +Invrea, 1951 +) + +. However, both species can be distinguished by the following characters: 1) Vosella thicker, with almost parallel sides in + +Ph. ligustica + +( +Fig. 7C–D +), while it is thinner, curved and narrower at the apex in + +Ph. fresnoi + +( +Fig. 5 +). In addition, whereas in + +Ph. fresnoi + +inner side of volsella is completely covered with setae that progressively lengthen towards apex, in + +Ph. ligustica + +( +Fig. 7C +) two distinct, separated zones can be distinguished, one basal with short setae and the other with long setae almost equal in size. 2) Clypeus with basal part striated in + +Ph. ligustica + +( +Fig. 7B +) and with sparse, superficial punctures in + +Ph. fresnoi + +( +Fig. 3B +). 3) Eyes larger in + +Ph. ligustica + +( +Fig. 7A +) than in + +Ph. fresnoi + +( +Fig. 3A +). Ratio between eye length and OOL: 2.1–2.6 (N = 8) + +Ph. ligustica + +vs 1.2–1.4 (N = 4) + +Ph. fresnoi + +; eye length and eye–anterior ocellus distance: 1.1–1.3 (N = 5) + +Ph. ligustica + +vs 1.0 (N = 4) + +Ph. fresnoi + +. + + + +FIGURE 7. + +Physetopoda ligustica +(Invrea) + +, male. +A–B +Italy, Liguria, holotype. +C +Portugal, Baixo Alentejo. +D +Portugal, Beira Baixa. +A +head, dorsal view; +B +head, frontal view; +C, D +genitalia. + + + +In addition, among Mediterranean + +Physetopoda + +, + +Ph. fresnoi + +can only be confused with + +Ph. defixa +( +Invrea, 1953 +) + + +comb. nov. +* + +( +Fig. 8 +), both sharing very similar genitalia ( + +Figs +6 + +, +8E +). However, + +Ph. defixa + +can be distinguished by a more robust appearance ( +Fig. 8A–B +), the absence of two prominent tubercles on the anterior border of the clypeus (at least slightly bilobulate), the presence of more elongated punctures on the basal part of the clypeus ( +Fig. 8C +), and a distinct propodeum punctuation, with a visible smooth space between cells ( +Fig. 8D +), whereas in + +Ph. fresnoi +, + +cells are much deeper and contiguous ( +Fig. 6B +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file