diff --git a/data/03/D0/87/03D087E3FFE87C54FE88FB70E232FE5F.xml b/data/03/D0/87/03D087E3FFE87C54FE88FB70E232FE5F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9bc939189d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/D0/87/03D087E3FFE87C54FE88FB70E232FE5F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,471 @@ + + + +Description Of The Mature Larva Of Glareadessus stocki Wewalka And Bistrom (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae), A Stygobiontic Bidessini From The Persian Gulf Region + + + +Author + +Alarie, Yves +Department of Biology, Laurentian University Ramsey Lake Road Sudbury, ON, CANADA + + + +Author + +Wewalka, Günther +Starkfriedgasse 16 A 2 1190, Wien AUSTRIA + +text + + +The Coleopterists Bulletin + + +2001 + +2001-06-01 + + +55 + + +2 + + +144 +151 + + + +journal article +310498 +10.1649/0010-065x(2001)055[0144:dotmlo]2.0.co;2 +db4098d6-d0a5-42f6-be9d-99cc83dbfe6b +1938-4394 +4900340 + + + + + + +Description of Instar III of + +Glareadessus stocki +Wewalka and Biström + + + + + + + +Figs. 1–5 + + + + +Diagnostic Combination: +body fusiformate; stemmata present but slightly reduced in size; cephalic capsule not constricted at level of occipital suture ( +Fig. 1 +); antennomere 2 lacking secondary setae; antennomere 3 with a ventroapical spinula, lacking pore ANf; maxillary cardo absent, primary seta +MX +1 inserted on maxillary stipes; primary seta +MX +5 lacking; prementum lacking lateral spinulae; primary seta TR2 of trochanters absent ( +Fig. 4 +); spinulae present on ventral margin of protarsus, otherwise lacking; legs lacking natatory setae ( +Figs. 4–5 +); posterotransverse carina lacking on thoracic terga of instar III; siphon strongly constricted posterior to insertion of urogomphi, and short, about 0.30 times LLAS ( +Fig. 2 +); primary seta UR2, UR3, and UR4 almost equally distant urogomphomere 1 ( +Fig. 3 +); urogomphomere 1 lacking secondary setae ( +Fig. 3 +). + + + + +Description, Instar III +( +Figs. 1–5 +). +Colour. +Body lightly pigmented, creamy white to pale yellow. + + +Head. +( +Fig. 1 +). HL = +0.63 mm +( +n = 3 +); HW = +0.44–0.46 mm +(mean = +0.45 mm +, +n = 3 +); FCL = +0.49–0.50 mm +(mean = +0.49 mm +, +n = 3 +); +cephalic capsule +( +Fig. 1 +) longer than broad (HL/HW = 1.39–1.44), pear­shaped, tapering posteriorly, not contricted at level of occipital suture; HW/OcW = 1.40– 1.44; ecdysial suture well­developed, coronal suture short, 0.21–0.23 times HL; occipital suture present; frontoclypeus bluntly rounded, broad (FCL/FCW = 2.83–3.17), 0.77–0.79 times as long as HL, with lateral notches visible in dorsal view; ventroapical margin of frontoclypeus with +≈ +20 spatulate setae ( +lamellae clypeales +of +Bertrand 1972 +); lateroventral margin with several lateral spine­like bulges (=denticles of +Perkins (1980)) +visible in dorsal view; ocularium present, stemmata slightly reduced in size, subdivided into 2 vertical series, not visible ventrally, stemmata of the posterior row more widely spaced; tentorial pits visible ventrally on each side of middle at about midlength; +antenna +4­segmented, shorter than HW (length of antenna/HW = 0.77–0.78); A2 +≈ +A3> A1 +≈ +A4, A2/A3 = 0.91–0.94; lateral elongation of antennomere 3 subequal in length to antennomere 4 (A3'/A4 = 0.87–0.91); antennomere 3 with a ventroapical spinula; +mandible +falciform, not toothed on inner margin, curved inward and upward apically, 0.47–0.49 times HL, 4.24–4.80 times longer than broad; +maxilla, +maxillary stipes short and thick, incompletely sclerotized ventrally; cardo, galea and lacinia absent; maxillary palpus 3­segmented, slightly shorter than antenna (length of antenna/ length of maxillary palpus = 1.14–1.17); +MX +1> +MX +2> +MX +3, palpomere 2, 0.82–0.83 times as long as palpomere 1; +labium, +prementum subtrapezoidal, slightly indented medially along anterior margin, +≈ +1.80 times broader than long, lacking lateral marginal spinulae; labial palpus 2­segmented, shorter than maxillary palpus (length of maxillary palpus/length of labial palpus = 1.30–1.33), palpomere 2 subfusiform, 1.07–1.10 times length of palpomere 1; +chaetotaxy and porotaxy, +primary pore ANf and +MX +5 lacking; seta +MX +1 articulated on maxillary stipes; head appendages lacking secondary setae except for 1 lateroproximal seta on mandible. + + + +Figs. 1–3. + +Glareadessus stocki +Wewalka and Biström, Instar III. + +1 +) head capsule, dorsal aspect; +2 +) last abdominal segment, dorsal aspect; +3 +) urogomphus, dorsal aspect. Scale bar = 0.10 mm. + + + + +Figs. 4–5. + +Glareadessus stocki +Wewalka and Biström + +, metathoracic legs, Instar III. +4 +) anterior face; +5 +) posterior face. Sensillar series: AV = anteroventral, AD = anterodorsal, PD = posterodorsal, Pr = proximal; PV = posteroventral. Scale bar = 0.10 mm. + + + +Thorax. +Pronotum trapezoidal dorsally, ovate laterally, widest at posterior margin; length of pronotum about 2 times length of mesonotum; metanotum subequal to mesonotum in length, both slightly wider than pronotum; pronotum without transverse carina; both meso­ and metathoracic terga with an anterotransverse carina; tergal setation well­developed on lateral and posterior margin; ventral surface of thoracic segments membranous; presence of spiracular openings not determined. + + +Legs +( +Figs. 4–5 +). 5­segmented; meso and metathoracic legs longest, +≈ +1.10 times length of prothoracic legs, 2.24–2.34 times HW; femur> coxa> tibia +≈ +tarsus> trochanter; tarsus with two claws, posterior claw slightly shorter than anterior claw on pro­ and mesothoracic legs, slightly longer on metathoracic leg; posterior metathoracic claw +≈ +0.40–0.43 times as long as metatarsus; +chaetotaxy and porotaxy, +primary seta TR2 lacking; spinulae present on ventral margin of protarsus; natatory setae absent; position and number of secondary setae as expressed in +Table 1 +. + + + +Table 1. +Number of secondary setae on the legs of third instar of + +Glareadessus stocki +Wewalka and Biström. A + += anterior, AD = anterodorsal, AV = anteroventral, CO = coxa, D = dorsal, FE = femur, PD = posterodorsal, Pr = proximal, PV = posteroventral, TA = tarsus, TI = tibia, TR = trochanter, V = ventral, n = number of specimens studied, range = total number of secondary setae on segment. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
SegmentSensillar seriesInstar III (n = 3)Sensillar seriesInstar III (n = 3)
Segment
ProCOD4MesoTIAD1–2
A0AV1–2
V0PD1
Range4PV1
ProTRPr0Range5
ProFEAD3MesoTAAD1
AV1AV2
PV2–3PD0
Range6–7PV0
ProTIAD0Range3
AV0MetaCOD3
PD1A0
PV1V0
Range2Range3
ProTAAD0MetaTRPr1
AV0MetaFEAD4
PD0AV3
PV0PV2–3
Range0Range9–10
MesoCOD3–4MetaTIAD2
A0AV1–2
V0PD1
Range3–4PV1
MesoTRPr1Range5–6
MesoFEAD4MetaTAAD1
AV1AV2
PV2–3PD0
Range7–8PV0
Range3
+ + +Abdomen +( +Fig. 2 +). 8­segmented; maximum width of body at level of metathorax and abdomen segments 1 to 3; LLAS = +0.19–0.24 mm +(mean = +0.22 mm +, +n = 3 +); segments 1–6 dorsally sclerotized, segment 7–8 completely sclerotized; all terga with an anterodorsal transverse carina and with long setae along lateral and posterior margins; presence of spiracular openings not determined; segment 8 short, LLAS/HW = 0.44–0.53, with siphon strongly constricted posterior to insertion of urogomphi; +siphon +short, bluntly rounded apically, 0.26–0.33 times LLAS; +chaetotaxy and porotaxy, +secondary tergal setation reduced. + + +Urogomphus +( +Fig. 3 +). Two­segmented; total length of urogomphus (=Uro1 + Uro2') = 0.98–1.00 mm (mean = +0.99 mm +, +n = 2 +) (length of urogomphomere 1 = +0.63–0.67 mm +(mean = +0.65 mm +, +n = 2 +)); 2.19–2.20 times HW (length of Uro1/HW = 1.41–1.47) and 4.18–4.36 times LLAS (length of Uro1/ LLAS = 2.68–2.93); urogomphomere 1 longer than urogomphomere 2 (Uro1/ Uro2' = 1.79–2.04); +chaetotaxy and porotaxy, +all primary setae and pores of generalized larva present; primary setae UR2, UR3 and UR4 almost equally distant; secondary setae absent. + + + + +Biological Notes. +This species occurs in groundwater of wadis. It was collected in gravel banks using B.­R. pumps, +75–100 cm +under the surface ( +Wewalka and Biström 1998 +). + + + + +Distribution. +Oman +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/D0/87/03D087E3FFE97C50FED9F9A3E1C0FE78.xml b/data/03/D0/87/03D087E3FFE97C50FED9F9A3E1C0FE78.xml deleted file mode 100644 index b9c40aae1f4..00000000000 --- a/data/03/D0/87/03D087E3FFE97C50FED9F9A3E1C0FE78.xml +++ /dev/null @@ -1,90 +0,0 @@ - - - -Description Of The Mature Larva Of Glareadessus stocki Wewalka And Bistrom (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae), A Stygobiontic Bidessini From The Persian Gulf Region - - - -Author - -Alarie, Yves -Department of Biology, Laurentian University Ramsey Lake Road Sudbury, ON, CANADA - - - -Author - -Wewalka, Günther -Starkfriedgasse 16 A 2 1190, Wien AUSTRIA - -text - - -The Coleopterists Bulletin - - -2001 - -2001-06-01 - - -55 - - -2 - - -144 -151 - - - -journal article -10.1649/0010-065x(2001)055[0144:dotmlo]2.0.co;2 -1938-4394 -4900340 - - - - - - -avenionensis -Guignot ( -Richoux 1980 -) - -are the only subterranean dytiscid spe­ - - -144 - - - -cies described as larvae. Recently, Watts and Humphreys (1999) tentatively associated two larval forms with the bidessine subterranean species - -Tjirtudessus eberhardi - -and - -Niridessus pulpa - -respectively. The recent discovery of larvae of - -Glareadessus stocki - -is interesting as it provides an opportunity to formally describe for the first time the larva of a stygobiontic -Bidessini -. In this article, we describe the mature larva of - -G. stocki - -with an emphasis on chaetotaxy and porotaxy and compare the ground plan pattern of larval features of - -Glareadessus - -with those of other bidessine genera for which the larvae have been described. - - - - \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/68/6E/87/686E87A5BE74FFD4FFD0FA48FB1DFA65.xml b/data/68/6E/87/686E87A5BE74FFD4FFD0FA48FB1DFA65.xml index 02646616d6f..c96aa2e29ea 100644 --- a/data/68/6E/87/686E87A5BE74FFD4FFD0FA48FB1DFA65.xml +++ b/data/68/6E/87/686E87A5BE74FFD4FFD0FA48FB1DFA65.xml @@ -1,88 +1,88 @@ - - - -Endemic families of Madagascar. V. A synoptic revision of Eremolaena, Pentachlaena and Perrierodendron (Sarcolaenaceae) + + + +Endemic families of Madagascar. V. A synoptic revision of Eremolaena, Pentachlaena and Perrierodendron (Sarcolaenaceae) - - -Author + + +Author -Lowry Ii, Porter P. -Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166 - 0299, U. S. A & Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. -lowry@mobot.org & lowry@mnhn.fr +Lowry Ii, Porter P. +Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166 - 0299, U. S. A & Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. +lowry@mobot.org & lowry@mnhn.fr - - -Author + + +Author -Haevermans, Thomas -Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. -haever@mnhn.fr +Haevermans, Thomas +Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. +haever@mnhn.fr - - -Author + + +Author -Labat, Jean-Noël -Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. -labat@mnhn.fr +Labat, Jean-Noël +Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. +labat@mnhn.fr - - -Author + + +Author -Schatz, George E. -Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166 - 0299, U. S. A -schatz@mobot.org +Schatz, George E. +Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166 - 0299, U. S. A +schatz@mobot.org - - -Author + + +Author -Leroy, Jean-François -Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France +Leroy, Jean-François +Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France - - -Author + + +Author -Wolf, Anne-Elizabeth -Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. -aewolf@mnhn.fr +Wolf, Anne-Elizabeth +Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. +aewolf@mnhn.fr -text - - -Adansonia +text + + +Adansonia - -2000 - -3 + +2000 + +3 - -2000-12-31 + +2000-12-31 - -22 + +22 - -1 + +1 - -11 -31 + +11 +31 -journal article -310475 -10.5281/zenodo.4605658 -428d624e-afaf-4b79-9195-aeec9d5515de -1639-4798 -4605658 +journal article +310475 +10.5281/zenodo.4605658 +428d624e-afaf-4b79-9195-aeec9d5515de +1639-4798 +4605658 - + @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ alabastro elobato, sub anthesi lobulos celeriter evolvente, dense stellato-strig . - + Fig. 2. — @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ petal. ( - + TYPUS. — Réserves Naturelles @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ TYPUS. — P !; - + iso- , TEF @@ -208,7 +208,9 @@ Trees (height unknown). Twigs covered with stellate indumentum. Leaves obovate, × 1 mm, basifixed; ovary subglobose, not lobed in bud, but becoming so at anthesis, densely stellate-strigose, 3.5 × -1.5 mm, locules 5, number of ovules unknown; style 3 mm long, 0.5 mm in diam., stellate-strigose at base, stigma crateriform with a distinctly undulate margin. Fruits unknown. — Fig. 2. +1.5 mm, locules 5, number of ovules unknown; style 3 mm long, 0.5 mm in diam., stellate-strigose at base, stigma crateriform with a distinctly undulate margin. Fruits unknown. — +Fig. 2 +. diff --git a/data/AF/0B/87/AF0B87BCFE23FFC7FE1FFE34FCE9FC5A.xml b/data/AF/0B/87/AF0B87BCFE23FFC7FE1FFE34FCE9FC5A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..525bf243bfd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/AF/0B/87/AF0B87BCFE23FFC7FE1FFE34FCE9FC5A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,785 @@ + + + +Four new species of Cletocamptus Schmankewitsch, 1875, closely related to Cletocamptus deitersi (Richard, 1897) (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) + + + +Author + +Gómez, Samuel + + + +Author + +Fleeger, John W. + + + +Author + +Rocha-Olivares, Axayácatl + + + +Author + +Foltz, David + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2004 + +2004-11-20 + + +38 + + +21 + + +2669 +2732 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022293031000156240 + +journal article +10.1080/0022293031000156240 +1464-5262 +5250986 + + + + + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. + + + + +( +figures 1–13 +) + + + + + +Cletocamptus deitersi +( +Richard, 1897 +) +sensu +Dexter (1995) + +, + +Simpson +et al +. (1998) + +. + +Cletocamptus deitersi + +type +IIIC +sensu + +Rocha-Olivares +et al +. (2001) + +. + + + +Cletocamptus + +from Salton Sea, +California +sensu +Castro-Longoria +et al +. (2003). + + + + + +Type +material + + + + +One +female +holotype +( +USNM +1010499 +) and + + +one male +allotype +( +USNM +1010500 +) preserved in alcohol, + + +10 dissected female +( +EMUCOP- +0799-08 +, + + +EMUCOP- +0799-09 +, + + +EMUCOP- +0799-10 +, + + +EMUCOP- +0799-11 +, + + +EMUCOP- +0799-12 +, + + +EMUCOP- +0799-13 +, + + +EMUCOP- +0799-14 +, + + +EMUCOP- +0799-15, + +EMUCOP-0799-16, + +EMUCOP- +0799-17 +) and + + +five dissected male +( +EMUCOP- +0799-03 +, + + +EMUCOP- +0799-04 +, + + +EMUCOP- +0799-05 +, + + +EMUCO- +0799-06 +, + + +EMUCOP- +0799-07 +) +paratypes +, + + +six female +and +three male +paratypes +( +USNM +1010501 +) and + + +six female +( +EMUCOP- +0799-01 +) and + + +two male +( +EMUCOP- +0799-02 +) +paratypes +preserved in alcohol. + +July 1997 + +; coll. +A. Rocha- Olivares +, +J. W. Fleeger +and +D. Foltz +. + + + + + + +Type +locality + + +Salton Sea +, +California +( + +33 +° +13 +’ +N + +, + +115 +° +52 +’ +W + +). + + + + + +Etymology + + +The species was named in honour of Dr Deborah Dexter (San Diego State University, Department of Biology), who provided us with + +Cletocamptus + +specimens from the Salton Sea ( +California +). + + + + +Description + + +Female. +Habitus ( +figure 1 +) tapering posteriorly; total body length measured from tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami ranging from 540 to 715 +M +m (mean, 605 +M +m, +N +~12; +holotype +, 620 +M +m). Rostrum set off, triangular, with pair of setules subapically. Cephalic shield ornamented with fine and long spinules along margin dorsolaterally ( +figure 1A, B +). Dorsal and lateral surface of free thoracic somites (P2–P4 bearing somites) ornamented with transverse rows of minute spinules, with longitudinal row of small spinules close to posterior margin and with long spinules along posterior margin ( +figures 1A, B +, +2 +). Dorsal and lateral surface of first urosomite (P5 bearing somite) with transverse rows of minute spinules, with row of small spinules close to posterior margin and with relatively longer spinules along posterior margin ( +figures 1A, B +, +3 +). First and second genital somites distinct dorsally and laterally ( +figure 1A, B +), completely fused ventrally ( +figure 4A +); dorsal and lateral surface of first and second genital somite with transverse rows of minute spinules, with row of long spinules along posterior margin of both somites, and with relatively longer spinules laterally, ventrally ornamented with spinules as shown in +figure 4A +. Fourth and fifth urosomite as in second genital somite dorsally ( +figures 1A, B +, +3 +), ventral surface ornamented with transverse rows of spinules as illustrated in +figure 4A +. Dorsal surface of anal somite ( +figure 1A, C +) ornamented with transverse rows of minute spinules and with dorsolateral strong spinules close to joint with caudal rami; rounded anal operculum furnished with spinules close to posterior margin ( +figures 1A, C +, +3 +, +5H +); with median row of strong spinules laterally. Caudal rami ( +figures 1A, B, C, D +, +5H, I +) about 1.5 times longer than wide; dorsal and ventral surface smooth, except for inner set of spinules close to insertion site of seta VII and close to posterior margin dorsally and ventrally; with seven elements in all. + + + +FIG. 1. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, female. (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) habitus, lateral; (C) anal somite and caudal rami, dorsal; (D) anal somite and right caudal ramus, lateral. Scale bars: 100 +M +m. + + + + +FIG. 2. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, female. SEM microphotograph showing ornamentation along posterior margin of cephalic shield (CPH), dorsal ornamentation and ornamentation along posterior margin of first to third free thoracic somites (1–3FTS) and first urosomite (1US). + + + + +FIG. 3. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, female. SEM microphotograph showing dorsal ornamentation and ornamentation along posterior margin of first to fifth urosomite (1–5US) and anal somite (AS). + + + + +FIG. 4. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, female. (A) Urosome, ventral (P5 bearing somite omitted); (B) P5. Scale bar: 100 +M +m. + + + +Antennule ( +figure 5A +) six-segmented; surface of segments smooth except for two rows of spinules on first segment. Armature formula, 1-(1), 2-(8), 3-(5), 4-(1z[1zae]), 5-(1), 6-(9z[1zae]). + + +Antenna ( +figure 5B +) with small coxa. Allobasis armed with two abexopodal setae. Free endopodal segment ornamented with inner strong spinules proximally and subdistally; with two lateral inner spines and a slender seta (the latter arrowed in +figure 5B +), and five distal elements. Exopod ( +figure 5B, C +) one-segmented; about seven times longer than wide; ornamented with few spinules, and armed with one lateral and two apical smooth setae. + + + +FIG. 5. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, female. (A) Antennule; (B) antenna; (C) antennal exopod, another view; (D) mandible; (E) maxillule; (F) maxilla; (G) maxilliped; (H) anal somite and left caudal ramus; (I) right caudal ramus, lateral. Scale bars: 100 +M +m. + + + + +FIG. 6. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, female. SEM microphotograph showing mandibular palp with two setae and small seta arising nearby. + + + +Mandible ( +figures 5D +, +6 +) robust, ornamented with rows of spinules proximally; chewing edge with four strong teeth, four elements as in +figure 5D +, one pyriform element and one lateral pinnate strong seta. Palp (see +figure 6 +) one-segmented, with two long setae unequal in length, with one small seta arising nearby. + + +Maxillule ( +figure 5E +) robust; arthrite of praecoxa ornamented with few spinules, armed with one surface seta, seven distal spines and one lateral strong seta, the latter ornamented with long spinules (see insert in +figure 5E +). Coxa ornamented with some spinules and armed with two slender setae. Basis ornamented with some median spinules, and armed with three apical setae; exopod and endopod represented by three setae each. + + +Maxilla ( +figure 5F +): syncoxa ornamented with minute spinules along inner and outer margin, and close to joint with allobasis; with two endites, each bearing three setae (see insert in +figure 5F +). Allobasis drawn into strong claw bearing one accompanying seta. Endopod represented by three setae. + + +Maxilliped ( +figure 5G +) subchelate. Syncoxa ornamented with two rows of spinules and armed with a small seta on inner distal corner. Basis without armature and ornamented with one anterior and one posterior row of spinules, and with few spinules close to joint with endopod. The latter drawn into long and slender claw with one accompanying small seta. + + +P1 ( +figure 7A +): praecoxa ornamented with spinules close to joint with coxa. The latter ornamented with anterior transverse rows of spinules, and with posterior long and slender spinules in outer distal corner. Basis ornamented with median row of spinules, and with stronger spinules at base of exopod, between rami and at base of inner spine of basis. Exopod three-segmented. Endopod two-segmented, nearly as long as exopod. Armature formula as in +table 1. + + + +FIG. 7. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, female. (A) P1; (B) P2. Scale bar: 100 +M +m. + + + + +Table 1. Armature formula of the females of + +C. deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, + +C. stimpsoni + +sp. nov. +, + +C. sinaloensis + +sp. nov. +and + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
P1P2P3P4
EXPENPEXPENPEXPENPEXPENP
+ +C. deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +I-0;I-1;I,I1,10-1;0,I1,1I-0;I-1;II,2,10-0;I,1,1I-0;I-1;II,2,10-0;I,1,1I-0;I-1;II,2,00-0;0,2,0
+ +C. stimpsoni + +sp. nov. +I-0;I-1;I,I1,10-1;0,I1,1I-0;I-1;II,2,10-0;I,1,1I-0;I-1;II,2,20-0;1,1,3I-0;I-1;II,2,10-0;0,2,0
+ +C. sinaloensis + +sp. nov. +I-0;I-1;I,I1,10-1;0,I1,1I-0;I-1;II,2,10-0;I,1,1I-0;I-1;II,2,10-0;I,1,1I-0;I-1;II,2,00-0;0,2,0
+ +C. fourchensis + +sp. nov. +I-0;I-1;I,I1,10-1;0,I1,1I-0;I-1;II,2,10-0;I,1,1I-0;I-1;II,2,10-0;I,1,1I-0;I-1;II,2,00-0;0,2,0
+ + + +FIG. 8. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, female. (A) P3; (B) P4. Scale bar: 100 +M +m. + + + + +FIG. 9. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, male. (A) Habitus, dorsal; (B) habitus, lateral; (C) anal segment and caudal rami, dorsal; (D) anal segment and right caudal ramus, lateral. Scale bars: 100 +M +m. + + + +P +2 +( +figure 7B +): coxa ornamented with median row of small spinules and with strong spinules close to outer distal corner anteriorly, and with some spinules close to outer distal corner posteriorly. Basis ornamented with spinules between rami and at base of endopod, and with stronger spinules at base of exopod; outer element spine-like. Exopod three-segmented and ornamented as in +figure 7B +. Endopod twosegmented, reaching about the middle of second exopodal segment; first segment small, slightly wider than long and ornamented with outer and inner spinules; second segment ornamented with long spinules as shown in +figure 7B +, and armed with one inner spine, one apical and one inner seta. Armature formula as in +table 1. + + + +FIG. 10. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, male. (A) P1; (B) P2. Scale bar: 100 +M +m. + + + + +FIG. 11. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, male. (A) P3; (B) P4. Scale bar: 100 +M +m. + + + + +FIG. 12. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, male. (A) Urosome, ventral; (B) antennule. Scale bar: 100 +M +m. + + + +P3 ( +figure 8A +): praecoxa ornamented with transverse row of spinules close to joint with coxa. The latter as in P2. Basis as in P2 except for seta-like outer element. Exopod as in P2. Endopod as in P2 except for comparatively shorter second segment. Armature formula as in +table 1. + + +P4 ( +figure 8B +): praecoxa, coxa and basis as in P3. Exopod as in P3, except for armature formula of third segment (without inner seta). Endopod two-segmented, barely reaching tip of first exopodal segment; first segment small, slightly wider than long; second segment ornamented with inner and outer slender spinules and armed with two apical setae. + + + +FIG. 13. + +Cletocamptus deborahdexterae + +sp. nov. +, male. SEM microphotograph showing two distal teeth on last segment of male antennule. + + + +P5 ( +figure 4B +): exopod and baseoendopod fused. Baseoendopodal lobe longer than exopod, ornamented with sets of inner spinules, with spinules at base of apical seta and with some outer spinules; armed with one outer, one apical and four inner setae; relative length of setae as in +figure 4B +. Exopod ornamented with spinules as shown in +figure 4B +, and armed with five setae in all, plus outer seta of basis. + + +P6 ( +figure 4A +) represented by median plate in anterior half of first genital somite, each vestigial leg represented by a long and slender seta. Copulatory pore in the middle of genital double segment. + + +Male. +Total body length measured from tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami, ranging from 515 to 650 +M +m (mean, 562.8 +M +m, +N +~9; +allotype +, 605 +M +m). Habitus ( +figure 9A, B +), anal segment and caudal rami ( +figure 9C, D +) as in female dorsally, except for genital somite and for two rows of spinules on anal operculum. Ventral ornamentation of third, fourth and fifth urosomites ( +figure 12A +) coarser than in female. + + +Antennule ( +figures 12B +, +13 +) six-segmented; subchirocer. Last segment with two acute teeth ( +figure 13 +). + +Antenna, mandible, maxillule, maxilla and maxilliped (not illustrated) as in female. + +P1 ( +figure 10A +) as in female except for dimorphic projection on inner distal corner of basis. + + +P2 ( +figure 10B +) as in female except for relatively stouter outer spines of male exopod, dimorphic inner spine on male ENP 2, and relatively shorter apical setae on second endopodal segment. + + +Exopod of P3 ( +figure 11A +) as in female except for relatively stouter outer spines. Endopod three-segmented; second segment with inner distal apophysis reaching far beyond third endopodal segment; second segment barely reaching tip of first + +exopodal segment, with one inner and one apical seta relatively shorter than their female homologues. + +P4 ( +figure 11B +) as in female, except for stouter outer spines of exopod and + +relatively shorter setae of second endopodal segment. + +Both P5 fused ( +figure 12A +); exopod and baseoendopod fused. Exopod ornamented with spinules at base of outer seta of basis, at base of apical elements and along inner margin; with four setae. Endopodal lobe ornamented with spinules along outer and inner margin, and at base of apical setae; with three elements in all. + + +P6 ( +figure 12A +) represented by plate; without armature. + + +Variability + + +Male. +Paratype +(EMUCOP-0799-05) possesses an aberrant right P4. + + +Female. +Paratype +(EMUCOP-0799-10) possesses two inner setae on left P3 ENP 2; +paratype +(EMUCOP-0799-14) possesses two inner setae on left P4 EXP 2, and five setae on right P5 BENP; +paratype +(EMUCOP-0799-15) possesses one inner seta on right P4 EXP 3, and five setae on right P5 BENP; +paratype + + +(EMUCOP-0799-16) possesses an aberrant outer spine on right P1 EXP 3, three setae on left P4 ENP 2, and five setae on both P5 BENP; +paratype +(EMUCOP- 0799-09) possesses five setae on right P5 BENP; +paratype +(EMUCOP-0799-18) possesses a reduced inner seta on left P5 BENP (see +table 2 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file