diff --git a/data/03/B2/5B/03B25B455D66330763ED5A5FFD02F972.xml b/data/03/B2/5B/03B25B455D66330763ED5A5FFD02F972.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6ec5f9e14aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/B2/5B/03B25B455D66330763ED5A5FFD02F972.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,309 @@
+
+
+
+Staurosirella eruciformis, a new Staurosirella (Bacillariophyta) species from a historic sample from Scotland, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Vijver, Bart Van De
+0000-0002-6244-1886
+Meise Botanic Garden, Research Department, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium & University of Antwerp, Department of Biology - ECOSPHERE, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium & bart. vandevijver @ plantentuinmeise. be, https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 6244 - 1886
+
+text
+
+
+Phytotaxa
+
+
+2023
+
+2023-05-08
+
+
+595
+
+
+3
+
+
+296
+300
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.595.3.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/phytotaxa.595.3.4
+1179-3163
+7905974
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Staurosirella eruciformis
+Van de Vijver
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+(
+Figs 1–14
+LM, 15–18 SEM)
+
+
+
+
+
+Frustules solitary. Valves linear, with parallel, irregularly undulating margins and broadly rounded, non-protracted apices. Occasionally, valves with constricted central part present (
+Fig. 12
+). Continuous series of small aggregates of irregularly shaped, small, solid spines present along the valve face margin, located on the virgae (
+Figs 15–17
+). Spines absent on the valve apices. Valve dimensions (n=25): valve length 10–30 µm, valve width 5.0–6.5 µm. Sternum fairly narrow, weakly lanceolate, narrowing towards the apices. Externally, valve face uneven with virgae having a narrow, raised ridge and adjacent striae slightly sunken in ‘punch hole-like’ depressions (
+Figs 15–17
+). Vimines narrow, not raised. Striae alternating at both sides of the sternum, parallel to weakly radiate near the valve middle, becoming distinctly more radiate towards the apices,
+9–11 in
+10 µm, composed of long, slit-like, linear areolae, running parallel to the apical axis. Occasionally areolae doubled by short struts between the vimines (
+Figs 16, 17
+). Striae extending uninterruptedly from valve face onto mantle, areolae in size gradually narrowing at both ends (
+Fig. 17
+) giving the striae a lanceolate appearance. Small apical pore fields present at both apices, almost similar in size and shape, located at the valve face/mantle junction, isolated from neighboring striae (
+Fig. 15
+). Pore fields well delimited, composed of small pores, arranged in several irregular rows (
+Fig. 16
+). Internally, striae distinctly sunken between the flattened virgae and sternum (
+Fig. 18
+). Doubling of the areolae well visible. Areolae occlusions not observed, probably due to corrosion associated with the cleaning of the valves.. Girdle structure not observed.
+
+
+
+
+Type:—
+
+UNITED KINGDOM
+.
+Hawthorden
+,
+Scotland
+, Walker Arnott sample WA245, leg.
+Gregory
+(
+holotype
+slide
+BR-4785
+=
+Fig. 4
+,
+
+
+isotype
+slide
+423 in
+Collection University of Antwerp, Belgium)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Registration:—
+http://phycobank.org/103762
+
+
+
+
+Etymology:—
+The specific epithet “
+
+eruciformis
+
+” refers to the shape of the valves resembling a large caterpillar. The Latin word “
+eruca
+” means caterpillar.
+
+
+
+
+Ecology & associated diatom flora:—
+The only information available on sample WA245 is that it was collected in Hawthorden by Gregory. Only two samples in the entire Walker Arnott collection came from this locality in
+Scotland
+, samples WA244 and WA245, both gathered by Gregory. The sample is dominated by
+
+Denticula tenuis
+Kützing (1844: 43)
+
+,
+
+Odontidium hyemale
+(
+Roth 1800: 506
+)
+Kützing (1844: 44)
+
+,
+
+Fragilariforma nitzschioides
+
+(Grunow in
+Van Heurck 1881
+: pl. 44: fig. 10) Lange-Bertalot (in
+
+Hofmann
+et al.
+2011: 268
+
+) and various (at present unidentified) taxa in the genera
+
+Achnanthidium
+
+,
+
+Denticula
+
+,
+
+Planothidium
+
+and
+
+Nitzschia
+
+. This diatom flora mostly points to more or less oligotrophic, alkaline conditions (
+
+Hofmann
+et al.
+2011
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+Comments:—
+
+Staurosirella eruciformis
+
+can hardly be confused with other
+
+Staurosirella
+species
+
+, given its rather robust valve outlook, the absence of protracted apices, the linear outline with occasionally constricted margins and the typical spine gatherings on the valve margin. Most
+
+Staurosirella
+species
+
+have lower valve dimensions and often possess a more lanceolate valve outline.
+
+Staurosirella neopinnata
+E.A.
+
+Morales
+et al.
+(2019: 82)
+
+
+does not exceed 4.7 µm in valve width (contrary to 5.0–6.5 µm in
+
+S. eruciformis
+
+) and has a linear to linear-lanceolate valve outline with weakly convex, not concave, margins (
+
+Morales
+et al.
+2019
+
+).
+Van de Vijver (2022)
+described recently
+
+S. coutelasiana
+Van de Vijver (2022: 165)
+
+, a somewhat longer species (length up to 35 µm) but with a typical lanceolate valve outline, contrary to the broad, linear outline in
+
+S. eruciformis
+
+.
+
+
+A few other diatom taxa show some resemblance but at present they can only be compared using the original drawing as the
+type
+material of these has never been revised. For instance,
+
+Odontidium ventriculosum
+Schumann (1862: 184)
+
+has a similar elongated valve outline but with a clear central inflation (
+Schumann 1862
+, fig. 10). It is also possible that
+
+Fragilaria pinnata
+
+fo.
+parallela
+Mayer (1919: 196)
+is conspecific.
+Mayer (1919
+,
+1937
+) show drawings of several valves with an elongated, broadly rounded valve outline and a valve width of 4–5 µm, slightly lower than
+
+S. eruciformis
+
+. It is unclear where the Mayer material is currently conserved making a comparison rather impossible.
+As Mayer (1919)
+described his taxon as a variety, the name will not have priority in species rank and therefore a possible conspecificity will have no taxonomic consequences later.
+
+
+
+Staurosirella eruciformis
+
+has previously been reported, although never identified up to species level. Kulikovskij
+et al.
+(2011, plate 2 figs 13 & 14) illustrated 2 valves that might represent the new species and identified them as
+
+Staurosira
+sp.
+
+Similarly,
+Peeters & Ector (2017
+, p. 268) also show some valves that have a comparable valve outline. In both publications, it seems that the valve width is always lower (<4.5 µm) than in
+
+S. eruciformis
+
+and longer valves, typically found in the
+type
+population of the new species seem to be absent in the
+French
+and
+Belarussian
+population. A comparative analysis of all populations will be necessary to establish conspecificity.
+Finally
+, in the
+Republic of Northern Macedonia
+, a population of
+
+S. eruciformis
+
+was observed showing that the species most likely has a larger distribution range than being simply restricted to
+Scotland
+(Levkov, pers. comm.).
+
+
+The observation in the historic Walker Arnott sample shows once more the importance of historic collection samples, often gathered in pristine environments, lost nowadays due to pollution and anthropogenic impact. In the past year, several new species were published based on the analysis of the diatom flora in historic slides (
+Van de Vijver 2022
+,
+2023
+,
+Van de Vijver & Wetzel 2022
+). A better analysis of this historic material can provide valuable insights in for instance reference environmental conditions and previous biogeographical distributions of red-list species, nowadays almost extinct due to habitat loss. More efforts should be directed to the conservation, digitisation and study of these historic diatom collections in order to preserve and disclose this valuable knowledge.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/40/F2/4B/40F24B5DE64C5E2C959C3D11BCE23B5F.xml b/data/40/F2/4B/40F24B5DE64C5E2C959C3D11BCE23B5F.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..da1a6c27973
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/40/F2/4B/40F24B5DE64C5E2C959C3D11BCE23B5F.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,418 @@
+
+
+
+A new species of Merismomorpha Girault, 1913 (Chalcidoidea, Pteromalidae) from the Palaearctic region
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Tselikh, Ekaterina V.
+0000-0002-9184-043X
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rasplus, Jean-Yves
+0000-0001-8614-6665
+CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Lee, Jaehyeon
+0000-0002-3666-6029
+Department of Plant Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Dale-Skey, Natalie
+0000-0001-7582-0386
+Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Gupta, Ankita
+0000-0001-8415-8822
+ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bangalore, India
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Ku, Deok-Seo
+0000-0002-6274-6479
+The Science Museum of Natural Enemies, Geochang 50147, Republic of Korea
+
+text
+
+
+Journal of Hymenoptera Research
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-10-25
+
+
+97
+
+
+937
+944
+
+
+
+journal article
+304782
+10.3897/jhr.97.135648
+f7a6cc56-6700-42a7-90fb-6ccb5400bda5
+D3473710-0E18-413F-BBFD-4BC62CB66C7C
+
+
+
+
+
+Merismomorpha
+Girault, 1913
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Epipolycystus
+
+Girault, 1915: 336
+. Type species:
+
+Epipolycystus asilus
+Girault, 1915
+
+, by original designation. Synonymy by
+
+Bouček (1988: 461)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Giorgionia
+
+Girault, 1933
+. Type species:
+
+Giorgionia flavipetiole
+Girault, 1933
+
+, by monotypy. Synonymy by
+
+Bouček (1988: 461)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neopolycystella
+
+Girault, 1915: 336
+. Type species:
+
+Neopolycystella sicarius
+Girault, 1915
+
+, by original designation. Synonymy by
+
+Bouček (1988: 461)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type species.
+
+
+
+
+Merismomorpha acutiventris
+Girault, 1913
+
+, by original designation
+
+Girault (1913: 82–83)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Head without occipital carina (Fig.
+7
+). Gena with a shallow malar depression; genal lamina absent. Clypeal margin medially produced, subconical (Figs
+5
+,
+17
+). Antennal formula 11354 (Fig.
+5
+); flagellum slightly or obviously clavate; clava symmetric, area of micropilosity large, extending from distal
+clv
+1
+to
+clv
+4
+(Fig.
+5
+). Antenna inserted above lower ocular line; antennal protuberance absent; scrobes shallow (Figs
+5
+,
+17
+). Pronotum short with collar not carinate (Figs
+1
+,
+7
+,
+14
+); notauli complete (Figs
+7
+,
+15
+) or incomplete. Mesoscutellum arched, frenal area not raised (Figs
+1
+,
+14
+). Propodeum reticulate with conspicuous, long and posteriorly converging plical furrows; costula and median carina absent, nucha distinct; propodeal spiracle inserted close to anterior propodeal margin (Fig.
+7
+). Fore wing hyaline, with distinct speculum;
+mv
+not widened and longer than
+stv
+and
+pmv
+(Figs
+3
+,
+16
+). Hind coxa dorsally bare (Fig.
+4
+,
+14
+). Petiole in dorsal view smooth and fusiform (Fig.
+2
+); in lateral view appears as bipartite and curved (Fig.
+4
+).
+Mt
+2
+large with tapered base (Fig.
+2
+), cerci with setae subequal in length, ovipositor shortly protruding.
+
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+
+
+
+Merismomorpha
+Girault
+
+belongs to a small group of pteromaline genera with elongated petiole (
+Bouček 1988
+); it looks similar to
+
+Pterosemopsis
+Girault, 1917
+
+, with which it could be confused. Indeed, the two genera exhibit shared characters: a lower clypeal margin medially produced and subconical (Figs
+5
+,
+10
+,
+17
+); antennal formula 11354 (Figs
+5
+,
+8
+); antennal toruli situated above level of lower ocular line (Figs
+5
+,
+10
+,
+17
+); propodeum with converging plical furrows (Figs
+7
+,
+9
+,
+11
+); long and smooth petiole (Figs
+2
+,
+11
+). However,
+
+Merismomorpha
+
+differs from
+
+Pterosemopsis
+
+by the petiole in lateral view appears as bipartite and curved (Fig.
+4
+)
+vs
+petiole in lateral view appears as single and not curved in lateral view (Fig.
+8
+); frenal area of mesoscutellum not raised (Fig.
+1
+)
+vs
+raised (Figs
+8
+,
+12
+); collar margin of pronotum not carinate (Fig.
+1
+)
+vs
+carinate (Fig.
+8
+).
+
+
+
+Accurate circumscription and diagnoses of these genera have not been published yet and only the key to Australasian genera of
+
+Pteromalidae (
+Bouček 1988
+)
+
+can be used to separate them, which could be troublesome for Oriental species. Indeed, some of the species of
+
+Pterosemopsis
+
+have erroneously been identified as belonging to
+
+Merismomorpha
+
+. Likewise, some species of
+
+Merismomorpha
+
+may not belong here (e. g.
+
+M. gatra
+
+) (
+Sureshan et al. 2006
+) and the two genera are in need of revision.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA589F074D2521B4FDADFAAD.xml b/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA589F074D2521B4FDADFAAD.xml
index d78cc82361c..4383bb1c157 100644
--- a/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA589F074D2521B4FDADFAAD.xml
+++ b/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA589F074D2521B4FDADFAAD.xml
@@ -1,46 +1,46 @@
-
-
-
-Taming an ichnotaxonomical Pandora’s box: revision of dendritic and rosetted microborings (ichnofamily: Dendrinidae)
+
+
+
+Taming an ichnotaxonomical Pandora’s box: revision of dendritic and rosetted microborings (ichnofamily: Dendrinidae)
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Wisshak, Max
+Wisshak, Max
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2017
-
-2017-12-29
+
+2017
+
+2017-12-29
-
-390
+
+390
-
-1
-99
+
+1
+99
-journal article
-21907
-10.5852/ejt.2017.390
-54438cfa-5f3a-4ee3-85c8-00e453a6d641
-2118-9773
-3839858
-4D1D1CA3-8345-4BA3-9C7C-5EBDD40752CE
+journal article
+21907
+10.5852/ejt.2017.390
+54438cfa-5f3a-4ee3-85c8-00e453a6d641
+2118-9773
+3839858
+4D1D1CA3-8345-4BA3-9C7C-5EBDD40752CE
-
+Dictyoporus balani
(
Tavernier, Campbell & Golubic, 1992
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
-
+Dendrorete balaniTavernier, Campbell & Golubic, 1992: 304
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Without name –
-
+Dendrorete balani
–
@@ -109,14 +109,14 @@ into the shell. They consist of tubular, branched and anastomosing tunnels. The
in diameter (M ± s (n) = 35.5 ± 8.5 (78) µm), appear knobby, and are occasionally widened at branch points. The boring starts from a single point of entry and spreads initially in a radiating fashion. When cast in resin, these young diverging tunnels resemble the surface roots of some tropical trees. In later stages the network becomes prostrate, and the radiating pattern is masked by anastomosing cross-connections. Thus, a mature boring system of
Dendrorete
-balani
+balani
is organized in three concentric zones. The peripheral (youngest) one is the zone of lateral spreading of the boring system with straight, shallow “exploratory” tunnels. In the second zone behind, these tunnels interconnect to form a flat horizontal reticulum. Branches oriented toward the interior that form deeper arches are more common in the third (oldest) zone resulting in a three-dimensional reticulum.
Fig. 16.
-
+Dictyoporus balani
(
Tavernier, Campbell & Golubic, 1992
@@ -205,21 +205,21 @@ is supposedly deposited in the
Originally established within the ichnogenus
Dendrorete
, which is herein regarded as a junior synonym of
-
+Dictyoporus
(see above).
-
+Dictyoporus balani
is clearly distinguished from
-
+D. nodosus
by the more distinct ontogenetic zones, including deeper arches in the central (oldest) part of the trace, a higher number of rhizoidal connections to the substrate surface, a generally smaller trace and tunnel diameter, and by its mesh-size decreasing in the centre due to secondary interconnecting tunnels. In contrast to
-
+D. nodosus
, this ichnospecies always consists of endolithic tunnels only.
diff --git a/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA5C9F034E3B24E1FC21FBBE.xml b/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA5C9F034E3B24E1FC21FBBE.xml
index 3a6817b6bf1..1e039697e2b 100644
--- a/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA5C9F034E3B24E1FC21FBBE.xml
+++ b/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA5C9F034E3B24E1FC21FBBE.xml
@@ -1,46 +1,46 @@
-
-
-
-Taming an ichnotaxonomical Pandora’s box: revision of dendritic and rosetted microborings (ichnofamily: Dendrinidae)
+
+
+
+Taming an ichnotaxonomical Pandora’s box: revision of dendritic and rosetted microborings (ichnofamily: Dendrinidae)
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Wisshak, Max
+Wisshak, Max
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2017
-
-2017-12-29
+
+2017
+
+2017-12-29
-
-390
+
+390
-
-1
-99
+
+1
+99
-journal article
-21907
-10.5852/ejt.2017.390
-54438cfa-5f3a-4ee3-85c8-00e453a6d641
-2118-9773
-3839858
-4D1D1CA3-8345-4BA3-9C7C-5EBDD40752CE
+journal article
+21907
+10.5852/ejt.2017.390
+54438cfa-5f3a-4ee3-85c8-00e453a6d641
+2118-9773
+3839858
+4D1D1CA3-8345-4BA3-9C7C-5EBDD40752CE
-
+DictyoporusMägdefrau, 1937
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ ichnospecies
-
+Dictyoporus nodosusMägdefrau, 1937
@@ -126,22 +126,22 @@ A reinvestigation of the
of the type species and a wealth of new material from other localities exposing Upper Cretaceous strata in northern
Germany
revealed a considerable morphological variability between specimens, as well as within one and the same trace of
-
+D. nodosus
. This variability concerns the degree of anastomosis, the mesh size, and – most importantly – the occurrence and co-occurrence of shallow open channels and prostrate endolithic tunnels. While the distinction between open and closed galleries is possible in well-preserved material, it is often altered even by slight erosion or diagenetic pressure dissolution, complicating a confident discrimination. As a consequence, a morphological and ichnotaxonomical distinction of
-
+D. nodosus
from several other ichnotaxa cannot be maintained and herein leads to a widening of the ichnogenus diagnosis and a number of synonymisations.At the ichnogenus level, this concerns the ichnogenus
CicatriculaPalmer & Palmer, 1977
, which was only distinguished from
-
+Dictyoporus
by its preservation as open channels, while its most conspicuous feature, the high degree of anastomosis, was not part of the original ichnogenus diagnosis. However, that feature in particular and the flat and widened branching points strongly support an inclusion within
-
+Dictyoporus
.
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ and
Calcideletrix
should be considered as synonyms of
-
+Dictyoporus
that run at and below the substrate surface, respectively. However,
@@ -161,28 +161,28 @@ that run at and below the substrate surface, respectively. However,
Calcideletrix
is clearly distinguished from
-
+Dictyoporus
based on other, more distinct, morphological characters (i.e., almost complete lack of anastomoses, regular rhizoidal connections to substrate surface, etc.), and a synonymisation with
-
+Dictyoporus
is thus not recommended. Another potential junior synonym is
Repentella
Müller, 1968, the description and illustrations of which suggest the presence of tunnels with anastomoses similar to those in
-
+Dictyoporus
. However, reinvestigation of the type material clearly showed that they are merely moulds of epiliths and not trace fossils. The morphology of
DendroreteTavernier, Campbell & Golubic, 1992
also corresponds closely to that of
-
+Dictyoporus
and the former ichnogenus is herein regarded as another junior synonym. Its type ichnospecies is the only ichnospecies that is morphologically clearly distinct from
-
+D. nodosus
and is thus retained as a new combination.
diff --git a/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA5D9F064E6124C7FC4AFEAF.xml b/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA5D9F064E6124C7FC4AFEAF.xml
index fecc8646dd1..7e26a2bb884 100644
--- a/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA5D9F064E6124C7FC4AFEAF.xml
+++ b/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA5D9F064E6124C7FC4AFEAF.xml
@@ -1,46 +1,46 @@
-
-
-
-Taming an ichnotaxonomical Pandora’s box: revision of dendritic and rosetted microborings (ichnofamily: Dendrinidae)
+
+
+
+Taming an ichnotaxonomical Pandora’s box: revision of dendritic and rosetted microborings (ichnofamily: Dendrinidae)
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Wisshak, Max
+Wisshak, Max
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2017
-
-2017-12-29
+
+2017
+
+2017-12-29
-
-390
+
+390
-
-1
-99
+
+1
+99
-journal article
-21907
-10.5852/ejt.2017.390
-54438cfa-5f3a-4ee3-85c8-00e453a6d641
-2118-9773
-3839858
-4D1D1CA3-8345-4BA3-9C7C-5EBDD40752CE
+journal article
+21907
+10.5852/ejt.2017.390
+54438cfa-5f3a-4ee3-85c8-00e453a6d641
+2118-9773
+3839858
+4D1D1CA3-8345-4BA3-9C7C-5EBDD40752CE
-
+Dictyoporus nodosusMägdefrau, 1937
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
-
+Dictyoporus nodosusMägdefrau, 1937: 55
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
-
+Dictyoporus garsonensisElias, 1980: 273
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
-
+Dictyoporus nodosus
–
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ Dendroid-Form C –
Fig. 15.
-
+Dictyoporus nodosusMägdefrau, 1937
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ from the upper Campanian of Kronsmoor, Germany, showing a combination of open ch
on a slab of Ordovician hardground, displaying readily anastomosing channels with a decrease in mesh size towards the periphery.
I
. Holotype of junior synonym
-
+Dictyoporus garsonensisElias, 1980
@@ -358,11 +358,11 @@ A–B) is preserved in a
As noted above, the considerable morphological range of
-
+D. nodosus
questions the validity of a number of other ichnotaxa characterised by strongly anastomosing networks of channels or shallow tunnels. As a consequence, a number of ichnospecies are herein lumped within
-
+D. nodosus
as subjective junior synonyms. This concerns
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ as subjective junior synonyms. This concerns
as a sponge biotaxon, based on a single natural cast in a Carboniferous brachiopod. The
holotype
is currently lost but the morphological resemblance to
-
+D. nodosus
is evident from the original illustration alone (reproduced in
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ Cicatricula
from an Ordovician hardground (
Fig. 15H
). Its preservation as an anastomosing network of open channels does not merit retaining a separate ichnospecies, let alone ichnogenus. The third junior synonym is
-
+Dictyoporus garsonensis
, established by
@@ -401,13 +401,13 @@ based on traces in an Upper Ordovician rugose solitary coral and characterised a
showed that the diagenetic alteration and state of preservation render such a distinction problematic, and the body fossil preservation of epilithic algae thalli (according to Elias the part of the trace shown at the top of
Fig. 15I
) is herein questioned. These features more likely present mineralised infills of either shallow etched channels or exposed parts of endolithic tunnels, and both of these features are well within the morphological range of
-
+D. nodosus
. The trace also appears to be very common in Silurian skeletal carbonates, such as reported by
Bundschuh (2000)
under the informal names Dendroid-Form A and C, with the two forms again illustrating the morphological variability of
-
+D. nodosus
, which agrees with the appearance of this trace in epoxy casts of Cretaceous specimens.
diff --git a/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA799F394E542450FAD4F80C.xml b/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA799F394E542450FAD4F80C.xml
index 727762aa2f5..d1a551ad0cd 100644
--- a/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA799F394E542450FAD4F80C.xml
+++ b/data/88/78/B7/8878B758BA799F394E542450FAD4F80C.xml
@@ -1,40 +1,40 @@
-
-
-
-Taming an ichnotaxonomical Pandora’s box: revision of dendritic and rosetted microborings (ichnofamily: Dendrinidae)
+
+
+
+Taming an ichnotaxonomical Pandora’s box: revision of dendritic and rosetted microborings (ichnofamily: Dendrinidae)
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Wisshak, Max
+Wisshak, Max
-text
-
-
-European Journal of Taxonomy
+text
+
+
+European Journal of Taxonomy
-
-2017
-
-2017-12-29
+
+2017
+
+2017-12-29
-
-390
+
+390
-
-1
-99
+
+1
+99
-journal article
-21907
-10.5852/ejt.2017.390
-54438cfa-5f3a-4ee3-85c8-00e453a6d641
-2118-9773
-3839858
-4D1D1CA3-8345-4BA3-9C7C-5EBDD40752CE
+journal article
+21907
+10.5852/ejt.2017.390
+54438cfa-5f3a-4ee3-85c8-00e453a6d641
+2118-9773
+3839858
+4D1D1CA3-8345-4BA3-9C7C-5EBDD40752CE
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
-
+Talpina dendrinaMorris, 1851: 87
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ Without name –
-
+Talpina dendrina
–
@@ -293,18 +293,18 @@ Rosetten-Form A –
: pl. 22, fig. 5).
D
. Original illustrations of
-
+Talpina dendrina
(=
-D. dendrina
+D. dendrina
;
reproduced from
Morris 1851
: pl. IV, figs 4–7; 5 =
-
+Talpina ramosa
; 6a =
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ reproduced from
).
E
. Morris’ original belemnite from the Upper Cretaceous of Norfolk, UK, including the lectotype of
-
+D. dendrina
(encircled).
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ reproduced from
Hofmann, 1996
, within the morphological range of
-
+D. dendrina
; SEM of epoxy cast of a belemnite from the lower Maastrichtian at Kronsmoor, Germany.
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ comprises the Turonian to lower Maastrichtian and the belemnite genus
d’Orbigny, 1840 narrows down the stratigraphical range to the upper Campanian to lower Maastrichtian. The type material is deposited at the Natural History Museum in London (
PI
A 559). The belemnite contains, apart from many other bioerosion trace fossils, about ten specimens of
-
+D. dendrina
. Morris did not designate a