From 3923c307d737daf2d7d6a72cd625cf43f1ccd4d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ggserver Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 17:16:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add updates up until 2025-03-16 17:11:24 --- .../87/03AF87EAFFACBE6AFF5F27C1FB52FE3B.xml | 111 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) diff --git a/data/03/AF/87/03AF87EAFFACBE6AFF5F27C1FB52FE3B.xml b/data/03/AF/87/03AF87EAFFACBE6AFF5F27C1FB52FE3B.xml index bdfdfd7adb5..855d3f3f846 100644 --- a/data/03/AF/87/03AF87EAFFACBE6AFF5F27C1FB52FE3B.xml +++ b/data/03/AF/87/03AF87EAFFACBE6AFF5F27C1FB52FE3B.xml @@ -1,60 +1,63 @@ - - - -Genetic and morphological variation analyses of Dryophytes japonicus (Anura, Hylidae) with description of a new species from northeastern Japan + + + +Genetic and morphological variation analyses of Dryophytes japonicus (Anura, Hylidae) with description of a new species from northeastern Japan - - -Author + + +Author -Shimada, Tomohiko -0009-0006-4032-911X +Shimada, Tomohiko +0009-0006-4032-911X - - -Author + + +Author -Matsui, Masafumi -Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606 - 8501, JAPAN. +Matsui, Masafumi +Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606 - 8501, JAPAN. - - -Author + + +Author -Tanaka, Keito -0009-0006-4032-911X +Tanaka, Keito +0009-0006-4032-911X -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2025 - -2025-02-20 + +2025 + +2025-02-20 - -5590 + +5590 - -1 + +1 - -61 -84 + +61 +84 - -https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5590.1.3 + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5590.1.3 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5590.1.3 -1175-5326 -38EF91A3-62AF-4CB6-91DD-665A943BAEA7 +journal article +308645 +10.11646/zootaxa.5590.1.3 +381a344f-43e8-4c54-834c-0c44f90939f8 +1175-5326 +15035490 +38EF91A3-62AF-4CB6-91DD-665A943BAEA7 - + @@ -79,7 +82,7 @@ tree frog) ( -Fig. 8 +Fig. 8 ) @@ -374,14 +377,14 @@ Description of (in millimeters). Snout-vent length (SVL) 30.9; body robust; head short, wider (HW 12.2, 39.4%SVL) than long (HL 10.3, 33.4%SVL); snout truncate, tip rounded in dorsal outline; projecting beyond lower jaw, slightly rounded in lateral profile; canthus sharp; lore vertical, concave; nostril below canthus, midway between tip of snout (S-NL 1.5, 4.9%SVL) and anterior margin of upper eyelid; internarial distance (IND 2.5, 8.0%SVL) subequal to nostril to eye (N-EL 2.3, 7.3%SVL); eye large, length (EL 4.2, 13.5%SVL) 1.8 times eyenostril distance, equaling to snout length (SL 4.2, 13.5%SVL); interorbital (IOD 3.0, 9.7%SVL) wider than width of upper eyelid (UEW 2.7, 8.7%SVL) and internarial distance; pineal spot invisible; tympanum large and distinct, nearly circular (TDv=TDh 1.9, 6.0%SVL), about half eye diameter; vomerine teeth in indistinctly oval, small, and slightly oblique raised series (each of 3 teeth), the center posterior to line connecting posterior margins of choanae, connected with each other, but widely separated from choanae; tongue narrow anteriorly, moderately notched, without papilla; a pair of internal vocal sacs and vocal openings on corners of mouth. Forelimb stout (forelimb length 18.6, 60.1%SVL; LAL 15.0, 48.6%SVL); webbing poorly but distinctly developed; finger length formula: I<II<IV<III ( -Fig. 8C +Fig. 8C ), second finger as long as third; finger tips with round adhesive discs having circummarginal grooves; disk of third finger largest (3FDW 1.23, 4.0%), two thirds of tympanum diameter; indistinct palmar tubercles and supernumerary tubercles present; subarticular tubercles prominent, circular; indistinct nuptial pads on dorsal, medial, and ventral surfaces of first finger extending from its base to subarticular tubercle, covered with minute yellow asperities; inner palmer tubercle distinct, oval (IPTL 1.7, 5.5%SVL), subequal to tympanum diameter; indistinct skin fold present in outer side of forelimb, starting from disk of fourth finger to elbow. Hindlimb long (HLL 45.8, 148.6%SVL), about 2.5 times the length of forelimb; tibia (TL 13.8, 44.7%SVL) shorter than foot (FL 13.8, 44.8%SVL); heels do not touch with each other when limbs are held at right angles to body; tibiotarsal articulation of adpressed limb reaching posterior corner of eye; toe tips with round adhesive discs having circummarginal grooves; toe length formula I<II<III<V<IV; third toe subequal to fifth; toes moderately webbed, formula I 1–2 II 0–2 1/2 III 0–2 IV 2–1 V ( -Fig. 8D +Fig. 8D ); excision of membrane between two outer toes reaching middle subarticular tubercle of fourth when toes in contact; webs thick, not crenulate; subarticular tubercles prominent, rounded; inner metatarsal tubercle distinct, oblong (IMTL 1.2, 4.0%SVL), equaling to 3FDW, less than half length of first toe (1TL 3.5, 11.2%SVL); outer metatarsal tubercle small but distinct; indistinct tarsal fold present, connecting tibiotarsal articulation to inner metatarsal tubercle. Two distinct skin folds connecting both arms present on pectoral region, starting from anterior and posterior edges of arms, respectively. Head and dorsum smooth; no dorsolateral fold; a supratympanic fold from eye, curving to axilla; ventral and ventrolateral side of trunk and ventral side of thigh coarsely granular. - + FIGURE 8. Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views of the whole body, ventral view of left hand (C) and foot (D), and a lateral view in life (E) of the holotype of @@ -420,9 +423,9 @@ In the topotypic population, in diameter and light brown in animal hemisphere. Eggs are usually laid in small clumps. A total of eight tadpoles in stages 31–35 (total length [TOTL] = 25.8–38.3 [mean ± SD = 33.5 ± 3.8] mm, head body length [HBL] = 11.1–14.0 [mean ± SD = 12.3 ± 1.0] mm), and three in stages 36–41 (TOTL 33.8–40.9 [mean = 37.4] mm, HBL=14.5–15.3 [mean = 14.8] mm), from the type locality were closely examined. Head and body slightly flattened above, spheroidal below; head body width (HBW) maximum slightly anterior to level of spiracle 54–68% (median = 62%) of HBL; head body depth (HBD) 89–108% (median = 97%) of HBW; snout rounded; eyes dorsolateral, visible from below; nostril open, dorsal, rim raised, midway between tip of snout and eye; internarial 29–58% (median = 49%) of interorbital. Oral disk anteroventral, emarginate, width 31–43% (median = 39%) of HBW; marginal papillae on upper labium with wide gap; lower labium with a continuous row of papillae, submarginal papillae present near corners; denticles 2(2)/3 ( -Fig. 9D +Fig. 9D ) or 2(1–2)/3; beaks with black outer margins; outer surface smooth; margin finely serrate; upper beak weekly convex medially; neither beak divided. Spiracle sinistral, tube pointing upward and backward, almost completely attached to body wall. Anal tube dextral, attached to ventral fin; loops of gut visible ventrally in young larvae. Tail moderately long and lanceolate, both margins weakly convex, tapering gradually to slightly rounded tip; tail length 178–219% (median = 197%; only specimens with non-damaged tail) of HBL, maximum depth 30–36% (median = 36%) of length; dorsal fin origin at midpoint of body, deeper than ventral fin except near tail tip and body; ventral fin origin continuous to vent; caudal muscle moderately strong, maximum tail width 36–51% (median = 44%) of HBW; muscle depth at anterior one-third of tail 34–45% (median = 41%) of tail depth, steadily narrowed posteriorly, shallower than either fin in distal half of tail. Neuromasts on body surface are not discernible. In life dorsal and lateral body brown, spotted with clusters of dark pigmentations; venter white, scattered with dark gray on throat; tail scattered with black spots ( -Fig. 9A–C +Fig. 9A–C ). @@ -452,7 +455,7 @@ We analyzed mating calls of ten males, recorded at the topotypic population, at an air temperature of 16.8°C on 1 June 2023 by T. Shimada. Calls (N=10; acoustic parameters of each individual were estimated from average of five continuous notes) consisted of a series of notes each emitted at an interval (between the beginnings of two successive notes) of 0.29 ± 0.01 (0.25– 0.32) s ( -Fig. 10 +Fig. 10 ). Each note was composed of 17.3 ± 0.57 (13–20) short pulses and lasted for 0.10 ± 0.00 (0.07–0.12) s. The fundamental frequency was 1.68 ± 0.08 (1.55–1.88) kHz and the dominant frequency was 3.48 ± 0.12 (3.30–3.80) kHz. There are weak frequency and intensity modulations and some clear harmonics. Although we collected those data from males calling alone, it is known that a pair of males often call alternately, and the intervals of notes become longer in such cases compared with those emitted alone ( Aihara @@ -474,7 +477,7 @@ This species shares most morphological characters with its sister species, D. japonicus . However, the typical specimens of the new species is conspicuous in having a pigmented pattern of the rear of thigh ( -Fig. 1 +Fig. 1 ), which is not popular in D. japonicus @@ -482,7 +485,7 @@ This species shares most morphological characters with its sister species, and other congeneric species of East Asia ( -Fig. 6 +Fig. 6 ; Fei & Ye 2016 ). Yet, this diagnosis is not perfect because there is a pattern (category C) which is sometimes appear both in @@ -514,7 +517,7 @@ differ from the new species in lacking finger webbing (vs. rudimentary finger we et al. 2020). - + FIGURE 9. Dorsal (A), lateral (B), and ventral (C) views and the oral disc (D) of a tadpole of @@ -712,7 +715,7 @@ is supposed to be occupied by this species, the hybrid zone with D. japonicus exists at the northern area (Minoo City, Toyono Town, Nose Town) (See -Fig. 2 +Fig. 2 ). In Kyoto Prefecture , @@ -727,7 +730,7 @@ is restricted to southeastern half, and the middle to northwestern half are supp D. japonicus or (if any) hybrid populations of those two species (See -Fig. 2 +Fig. 2 ). In Nara Prefecture , we genetically examined only a sample from the southern tip, which had mtDNA of @@ -770,7 +773,7 @@ exist in this prefecture. Outside of Kuzmin & Maslova 2003 ). - + FIGURE 10. Advertisement call of