diff --git a/data/37/00/87/370087D9680B7C41FE76FE8DFB8E15DF.xml b/data/37/00/87/370087D9680B7C41FE76FE8DFB8E15DF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..78c0a691fb9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/00/87/370087D9680B7C41FE76FE8DFB8E15DF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,636 @@ + + + +A new subterranean Maraenobiotus (Crustacea: Copepoda) from Slovenia challenges the concept of polymorphic and widely distributed harpacticoids + + + +Author + +Brancelj, Anton +National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia; & School of Environmental Sciences, University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia; + + + +Author + +Karanovic, Tomislav +Department of Life Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea; & IMAS, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2015 + +2015-06-30 + + +49 + + +45 + + +2905 +2928 + + + +journal article +21105 +10.1080/00222933.2015.1022620 +77436b0e-9e7a-48e5-b280-dd9491c58b68 +1464-5262 +4002329 +92302CF9-21BA-4454-A3DD-337BB7152DCE + + + + + + +Maraenobiotus slovenicus + +sp. nov. + + + + + +( +Figures 1–8 +) + + + + + +Material examined + + + + + +Holotype +. + +adult female (length +658 µm +), completely dissected and mounted on a slide in glycerol and sealed with nail polish; collected on + + +20 January +2014 + + +in the temporary spring +Močilo +near village +Gornji Ig +( +Ljubljana +, +Slovenia +); deposited in the +Slovenian Museum of Natural History +( +Ljubljana +), registration no. +PMS 2014.1352 +. + + + + + +Allotype +. + +adult male (length +551 µm +), completely dissected and mounted on a slide in glycerol and sealed with nail polish; collected on same date at same location as holotype; deposited in the +Slovenian Museum of Natural History +( +Ljubljana +), registration no. +PMS 2014.1353 +. + + + + + +Paratypes +. + +10 females +, +3 males +(stored in 70% alcohol); collected on + +8 February 2014 + +at the same location as holotype and +allotype +; deposited in the +Slovenian Museum of Natural History +( +Ljubljana +), registration no. +PMS 2014.1354 + +. Five females, + +2 males +(partly damaged) on a single SEM stub; deposited in the +Slovenian Museum of Natural History +( +Ljubljana +), registration no. +PMS 2014.1355 + +. + + + +The remaining specimens ( +20 females +, one male) collected on + +22 February 2014 + +at the same location as the holotype remain in authors’ collections + +. + + + + + +Description + + + +Female, body length, measured from tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami, +609–651 µm +(mean: +636 µm +; +n += 10), elongated, width constant to end of double genital somite, last three urosomal somites slightly narrower, evenly tapering toward anal somite, colourless ( +Figures 1A +, +2A +). Body length/width ratio about 4.5; prosome/urosome ratio 1.1; length/width ratio of cephalothorax in dorsal view about 1; cephalothorax about 22% of entire body length. Naupliar eye not discernible. Rostrum small, rounded ( +Figure 1B, C +). Integumental windows not discernible. Posterior margins of thoracic and abdominal somites dorsally smooth ( +Figure 1A, E, F, G +). Genital double-somite with no spines laterally or ventrally ( +Figures 1A, F +, +2C, D +, +7A +). Genital complex with single large copulatory pore, sclerotized, bellshaped; seminal receptacles small, simple and heavily sclerotized. Fused plate with reduced sixth legs positioned well above seminal receptacles ( +Figure 7A +). + + +Short row of spinules laterally on fourth urosomal somite; fifth urosomal somite dorsolaterally and ventrally with continuous row of spinules, smallest in ventromedial part ( +Figures 1A, G +, +2D +, +7B, C +). Anal somite laterally with short row of strong spinules; ventrally four groups of long and slightly curved spinules ( +Figures 1A, G +, +7B, C +). + + + +Figure 1. + +Maraenobiotus slovenicus + +sp. nov. +, SEM micrographs, paratype female 1: (A) habitus, dorsal; (B) cephalothorax, dorsal; (C) anterior part of cephalothorax, dorsal; (D) right antennule, dorsal; (E) free pedigerous somites, dorsal; (F) first three urosomites, dorsal; (G) last three urosomites and caudal rami, dorsal; (H) right caudal ramus, dorsal. + + + + +Figure 2. + +Maraenobiotus slovenicus + +sp. nov. +, SEM micrographs, paratype female 2: (A) habitus lateral; (B) cephalothoracic shield, lateral; (C) pleurons of free pedigerous somites, lateral; (D) first three urosomites, lateral; (E) anal somite and right caudal ramus, lateral; (F) antennule, lateral; (G) P3 and P4, lateral; (H) P5, lateral. + + + + +Figure 3. + +Maraenobiotus slovenicus + +sp. nov. +(A, B) SEM micrographs, paratype female 3; (C–H) damaged paratype male 1: (A) first two urosomites and P5; (B) P1–P3, ventrolateral; (C) habitus with several large epibiotic ciliates, ventral; (D) P4–P6, ventral; (E) last two urosomites and caudal rami, ventral; (F) antennule, ventral; (G) distal part of right antennule, ventral; (H) central part of right antennule, ventral. + + + + +Figure 4. + +Maraenobiotus slovenicus + +sp. nov. +, SEM micrographs, (A–D) damaged paratype male 1; (E–H) paratype male 2: (A) mouth appendages, ventral; (B) maxillule and maxilla, ventral; (C) central part of left antennule, ventral; (D) antenna, ventral; (E) left antennule, lateral; (F) first three urosomites, lateral; (G) anal somite and caudal rami, lateral; (H) detail of first urosomite, with cuticular window, large pore, and sensillum, lateral. + + + + +Figure 5. + +Maraenobiotus slovenicus + +sp. nov. +, line drawings, holotype female: (A) antennule, dorsal; (B) antenna; (C) mandible; (D) maxillule; (E) maxilla; (F) maxilliped. + + + + +Figure 6. + +Maraenobiotus slovenicus + +sp. nov. +, line drawings, holotype female: (A) P1; (B) P2; (C) P3; (D) P4; (E) P5. + + + + +Figure 7. + +Maraenobiotus slovenicus + +sp. nov. +, line drawings, (A–C) holotype female; (D, E) allotype male: (A) genital segment with attached spermatophore, ventral; (B) last urosomite, anal somite and furcal rami, ventral; (C) last urosomite, anal somite and furcal rami, dorsal; (D) last urosomite, anal somite and furcal rami, ventral; (E) anal somite and furcal rami, dorsal. + + + + +Figure 8. + +Maraenobiotus slovenicus + +sp. nov. +, line drawings, allotype male: (A) antennule, dorsal; (B) Endp P2; (C) P3; (D) P4; (E) P5 and P6. + + + +Anal operculum large, rounded, overreaching distal end of anal somite, with some 20 well developed spinules along distal margin ( +Figures 1A, G +, +7B, C +). Ventral side with additional row of minute spinules. Anal operculum about 58% of total anal somite width. + + +Caudal rami conical, slightly diverging, with inner and outer margins slightly convex; ramus as long as wide, with no dorsal keel ( +Figures 1A, G, H +, +2E +, +7B, C +). Inner distal corner dorsally with 6–10 strong spines, ventrally inner corner with row of long and slightly curved spinules followed by smaller spinules toward outer corner. Anterolateral external accessory seta (I) slightly shorter than furcal ramus, inserted close to base; anterolateral external accessory seta (II) shorter than seta I and thin. Posterolateral seta (III) positioned below insertion of outer terminal seta (IV), shorter than seta II, very thin. Outer terminal seta (IV) reduced to minute knob, heavily chitinized. Inner terminal seta (V) reduced to minute knob, bigger then seta IV, heavily chitinized. Inner accessory seta (VI) reduced, not discernible from nearby spines. Dorsal seta (VII) slightly longer than caudal ramus, inserted on internal side, at about mid length. + + +Antennule ( +Figures 1B, C, D +, +2F +, +5A +) relatively short, eight-segmented. Aesthetasc on fourth segment cylindrical, with rounded tip, reaching base of 8th segment. Second aesthetasc on terminal segment as long as first, slim. Both aesthetascs combined as acrotheck (common base of spine and aesthetasc). Setal formula: 1.7.5.2.1.2.2.8. Length ratio of antennular segments from proximal to distal end and along caudal margin 1:2:1.4:1:1:1.4:1:2.2. + + +Antenna ( +Figures 2B +, +5B +) with allobasis, and robust, one-segmented Exp and Endp. Three strong spines on outer margin of Endp, increasing in length distally; terminal armature consisting of one short spine, one twice as long as short spine, and four geniculate setae. Exp with four spiniform setae, one ornamented with spinules on one margin. + + +Mandible ( +Figure 5C +) short and robust, with two strongly chitinized teeth on gnathobase. Dorsal seta near gnathobase. Mandibular palp very short, fused with coxa, with five setae, one of them twice as long as the other. + + +Maxillule ( +Figure 5D +) with strong and robust spines on praecoxal arthrite. Coxa with strong, chitinized spine and slim seta. Basis with strong, beak-like outgrowth, with long seta and long setules unilaterally. Exp and Endp reduced, fused with basis; each represented by two weak setae. + + +Maxilla ( +Figure 5E +) two-segmented; syncoxa with 2 endites with 3 and 2 elements. Basis with strong spine and long seta. Endp reduced to three setae. + + +Maxilliped ( +Figure 5F +) comprising syncoxa, basis, and one-segmented Endp. Syncoxa with seta distally. Basis three times as long as wide, with 8–10 spinules positioned near palmar margin dorsally, equal in length. Endp drawn out into strong, acutely curved claw; as long as basis and armed with several spinules in distal half; additional armature represented by a short seta. + + +P1 ( +Figures 3B +, +6A +) with two-segmented Exp and Endp, equal in length. Basis with strong and robust inner spiniform seta and stout outer basal spine. Exp–1 with strong outer spine; Exp–2 with two strong spines laterally, spine and two long geniculate setae terminally; inner terminal seta longer than Exp. Endp–1 with long seta on inner margin at two thirds length. Endp–2 terminally with three setae; innermost short and soft, terminal seta long and geniculate, outer one spiniform, with spinules on outer margin. + + +P2 ( +Figures 3B +, +6B +) on basis with spiniform outer seta. Three-segmented Exp and two-segmented Endp. Endp as long as Exp–1 and Exp–2 combined. Exp–1 1.3 times as long as wide, with strong spine at distal corner. Exp–2 with strong outer spine. Exp–3 twice as long as wide, with two outer spines, terminal spiniform seta with strong spinules unilaterally and slim and bare seta, as long as spiniform seta. Endp–1 as long as wide, with seta on inner margin, at about two thirds of segment length. Endp–2 twice as long as wide, with seta along inner margin at half length of segment. Terminally two long soft setae, sub-equal in length; robust spiniform outer terminal seta, as long as Endp–2. + + +P3 ( +Figures 2G +, +3B +, +6C +) with long and thin outer basal seta. Three-segmented Exp and two-segmented Endp. Endp slightly shorter as Exp–1 and Exp–2 combined. Exp–1 and Exp–2 similar to that of P2. Exp–3 with relatively weak spine on 2/3 of outer margin, robust spine subterminally and two robust setae terminally. Additional two robust setae on inner margin at 1/3 and 2/3 length of segment, respectively. Endp two-segmented; Endp–1 as in P2. Endp–2 with a row of strong spines on outer margin. Terminally two long soft setae, sub-equal in length; robust spiniform outer terminal seta, as long as Endp–2; two long and weak setae on inner margin at 1/3 and 2/3 length of segment, respectively. + + +P4 ( +Figures 2G +, +6D +) with outer basal seta long and thin, with additional very long and thin spinules. Three-segmented Exp and two-segmented Endp. Endp reaching about to middle of Exp–2. Exp–1 and Exp–2 similar to those of Pa and P3 but with additional robust seta on inner distal corner of Exp–2. Exp–3 twice as long as wide, with relatively weak spine located subterminally on outer margin. Terminally two long soft setae, sub-equal in length; robust spiniform outer terminal seta, shorter than Exp–3; long seta on inner margin at half length of segment, respectively. Endp–1 as wide as long, smaller as in P2 or P3 respectively. Spine on inner margin with distinct long spinules. Endp–2 with short spine on outer margin, at 2/3 of segment length. Terminally robust spiniform seta on outer position and two setae unequal in length. Seta on inner margin at mid length of segment. + + +P5 ( +Figures 2D, H +, +3A +, +6E +) Exp and baseoendopod not distinctly separated; baseoendopodal lobe well developed, with four strong pinnate spines of unequal length; innermost three increasing in length toward outside; outermost shortest, Exp lobe longer than baseoendopodal, as long as wide, with three apical setae of unequal length; innermost shortest, with strong spinules; medial longest, with strong spinules; outer one bare. Outer lateral seta on baseoendopodal lobe long and bare, but one very long setula. + + +P6 ( +Figure 7A +) fused, small, forming simple plate; each with thin seta with several long setulae. + + +Male, body length, measured from tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami, +524–554 µm +; average: +543 µm +( +n += 4), elongated, widest at distal part of cephalosome, rest of body slightly narrower, evenly tapering toward anal somite, colourless ( +Figure 3C, D, E +). Naupliar eye not discernible. Rostrum small. Integumental window not discernible. Posterior margins of thoracic and abdominal somites dorsally and ventrally smooth ( +Figures 3D, E +). Short row of small spinules laterally on first urosomal somite; continuous row of small spinules dorsally on second urosomal somite ( +Figure 4F +); third urosomal somite dorsally with three groups of small spinules; fourth and fifth urosomal somite dorsally with four groups of small spinules, laterally with longer spinules; fourth urosomal somite ventrally with continuous row of spines equal in length; fifth urosomal somite ventrally with continuous row of spinules unequal in length ( +Figures 3C, E +, +7D +). Anal somite laterally with short row of strong spinules; ventrally row of spines between bases of furcal rami ( +Figures 3E +, +4G +, +7D +). First and second urosomite with cuticular window each; large pore next to cuticular window on first urosomite ( +Figures 3D +, +4F, H +). + + +Anal operculum well developed, rounded, overreaching distal end of anal somite, with about 10 well-developed spinules along distal margin ( +Figure 7D, E +). + + +Caudal rami almost rectangular, slightly longer than wide, diverging; outer margin slightly convex; with no dorsal keel ( +Figures 3C, E +, +7D, E +). Ventrally row of spinules at distal part of ramus ( +Figures 3E +, +7D +). Anterolateral external accessory seta (I) thin, slightly longer than ramus, inserted at 1/3 of ramus length ( +Figures 4G +, +7D, E +); anterolateral external accessory seta (II) as long as seta I, thin; positioned at distal corner of ramus. Posterolateral seta (III) absent. Outer terminal seta (IV) about 4 times as long as seta II, with fracture plane. Inner terminal seta (V) about 2.5 times as long as seta III, straight, robust, with fracture plane. Inner accessory (VI) slightly longer than seta I. Dorsal seta (VII) slightly longer than caudal ramus, inserted on internal side, at about mid length. + + +Antennule ( +Figures 3C, F, G, H +, +4C, E +, +8A +) relatively short, robust, ninesegmented, strongly chitinized. Geniculated articulation between sixth and seventh segments. Aesthetasc on fifth segment cylindrical, short, does not extend over fifth segment, aesthetasc on ninth segment spine-like. Both aesthetascs combined as acrotheck (common base of spine and aesthetasc). Proximal part of fifth segment extended medially, with strong chitinous tooth at inner corner ( +Figures 3F, H +, +8A +). Setal formula: 0.1.1.2.9.3.0.0.9. + +Antenna, mandible, maxillule, maxilla, maxilliped, P1 similar to those in female. + +P2 ( +Figure 8B +): Exp similar to female. Endp two segmented. Endp as long as Exp–1 and Exp–2 combined. Endp–1 0.75 times as long as wide, with seta on inner distal corner. Endp–2 three times as long as wide, with seta along inner margin at 1/3 length of segment. Terminally two soft setae, sub-equal in length, slightly shorter than segment; well-formed incision present on inner margin subterminally; at half length of segment on inner margin short spine, and at 1/4 two long spinules. + + +P3 ( +Figure 8C +) with long and thin outer basal seta. Three-segmented Exp and two-segmented Endp. Endp reaching middle point of Exp–2. Exp–1 and Exp–2 similar to that of female. Exp–3 with relatively weak spine on 2/3 of outer margin, robust spine subterminally, long robust outer seta and short inner spiniform seta terminally. Additional two robust bare spiniform setae on inner margin at 1/3 and 2/3 length of segment, respectively. Endp two-segmented; Endp–1 with long spear-like apophysis, reaching tip of Exp–3. Endp–2 with relatively short blunt spine curving outward and spear-shaped seta as long as spear-like apophysis of Endp–1. + + +P4 ( +Figures 3D +, +8D +) with outer basal seta long and thin, with additional two very long and thin spinules. Three-segmented Exp and two-segmented Endp. Endp extending just beyond Exp–1. Exp armature similar to female but less robust. Endp–1 half as wide as long, with no spine/seta on inner margin. Endp–2 with short spine on outer margin, at 2/3 of segment length. Terminally spiniform seta on outer position and two setae unequal in length. No seta on inner margin. + + +P5 ( +Figures 3D +, +4F +, +8E +) Exp and baseoendopod well separated; baseoendopod well developed, with two strong pinnate spines of unequal length; inner longer. Exp longer than baseoendopod, as long as wide, with four elements; inner three setae increasing in size toward outside; innermost seta bare; medial with unilateral spinules, outer with strong spinules bilaterally. Outermost seta as long as second innermost seta, with unilateral spinules. Outer lateral seta long with few long setules unilaterally. + + +P6 ( +Figures 3D +, +4F +, +8E +) fused, small, forming simple plate; each with thin bare seta. + + + +Variability + + +No variability was observed other than minor variation in the number of spinules on the abdominal somites. + + + + +Etymology + + + +The new species is named after +Slovenia +, where the specimens were collected for the first time. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +This Slovenian +new species +undoubtedly belongs to the + +Maraenobiotus vejdovskyi + +complex, which is mostly defined by the armature formula of its appendages ( +Lang 1948 +). Its truncated female principal caudal setae would put it close to + +Maraenobiotus veydovskyi truncatus +Gurney, 1932 + +, but a closer examination of this subspecies (which is elevated to the full specific rank below) and detailed comparison with our population reveals a number of significant differences. For example, + +M. vejdovskyi truncatus + +has a much shorter anal operculum than + +M. slovenicus + +sp. nov. +, which is ornamented with minute spinules (versus long spinules in + +M. slovenicus + +). Also, + +M. vejdovskyi truncatus + +has no distal lateral caudal setae in female (versus well-developed setae in + +M. slovenicus + +), and the transformed Endp of the male third leg has but a single apical element (versus two apical elements in + +M. slovenicus + +). Unfortunately, many other characters could not be compared because of a limited set of illustrations provided by +Gurney (1932) +for + +M. vejdovskyi truncatus +. + +There are three other reported and illustrated populations from this complex with truncated female principal caudal setae, one from +Japan +( +Ishida 1987 +) and two from +Italy +( +Pesce et al. 1994 +), which we describe below as new species. However, both + +M. ishidai + +sp. nov. +from +Japan +and + +M. galassiae + +sp. nov. +from +Italy +(see below) have much longer and cylindrical caudal rami. + +Maraenobiotus pescei + +sp. nov. +from +Italy +(see below), however, has caudal rami very similar in shape to those of + +M. slovenicus + +, but the two differ in the lateral armature of the caudal rami (lateral setae very reduced or absent in + +M. pescei + +versus well developed in + +M. slovenicus + +), number and size of spinules on the anal operculum (longer and fewer in + +M. slovenicus + +), segmentation of the antennal Exp (two-segmented in + +M. pescei + +versus one-segmented in + +M. slovenicus + +), number of apical elements on the second Endp segment of the male P3 (one in + +M. pescei + +versus two in + +M. slovenicus + +), and relative length of Endp spine on the male P5 (the inner one almost twice as long as the outer one in + +M. pescei + +versus nearly equal in + +M. slovenicus + +). Unfortunately, illustrations and descriptions of other four species are not as complete as those of + +M. slovenicus + +, so many morphological characters could not be compared. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/00/87/370087D9681C7C42FE37FF49FD4A16BF.xml b/data/37/00/87/370087D9681C7C42FE37FF49FD4A16BF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fd98f789351 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/00/87/370087D9681C7C42FE37FF49FD4A16BF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ + + + +A new subterranean Maraenobiotus (Crustacea: Copepoda) from Slovenia challenges the concept of polymorphic and widely distributed harpacticoids + + + +Author + +Brancelj, Anton +National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia; & School of Environmental Sciences, University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia; + + + +Author + +Karanovic, Tomislav +Department of Life Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea; & IMAS, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2015 + +2015-06-30 + + +49 + + +45 + + +2905 +2928 + + + +journal article +21105 +10.1080/00222933.2015.1022620 +77436b0e-9e7a-48e5-b280-dd9491c58b68 +1464-5262 +4002329 +92302CF9-21BA-4454-A3DD-337BB7152DCE + + + + + + +Maraenobiotus galassiae + +sp. nov. + + + + +[ + +partim.] + +Maraenobiotus vejdovskyi +Mrázek, 1893 + +– +Pesce et al. 1994 +: p. 83, figs. 18–27. + + + + + +Type locality + + + +Italy +, Alto Adige, Croda di Cengles, I Laghetti, Seenlein, smaller lake, epibenthic and interstitial habitat in pebbles and coarse gravel. + + + +Type material + + + + +Holotype +female illustrated by +Pesce et al. (1994) +in their figures 18–27, from the type locality, originally deposited in the +Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali +, Università di L’ Aquila, Via Vetoio 14, 67100 Coppito, L’ Aquila, +Italy +. Current location the same, but condition not checked since the 2009 L’ Aquila earthquake, which damaged many slides ( +Prof. Diana M. P. Galassi +, personal communication, + +July 2014 + +). [not examined] + + + + + + +Etymology + + + +The species name is dedicated to Prof. Diana M. P. Galassi, who discovered these specimens in +Italy +with her collaborators. The name is a noun in the genitive singular. + + + + + +Description + + + +Female as illustrated by +Pesce et al. (1994) +in their figures 18–27, as + +Maraenobiotus veydovskyi +Mrázek, 1893 + +. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +This female specimen has truncated principal caudal setae as in + +Maraenobiotus veydovskyi truncatus +Gurney, 1932 + +, but the caudal rami look very different in shape and size. They are cylindrical in dorsal view and almost twice as long as wide in + +M. galassiae + +sp. nov. +, while the caudal rami in + +M. vejdovskyi truncatus + +are almost conical in shape and about as long as wide. Also, in the latter species the distal lateral caudal setae seem to be either much reduced in size or absent, while they are well developed in the former. The caudal rami of + +M. galassiae + +are most similar in shape to those of the Japanese + +M. ishidai + +sp. nov. +(see above) and it may be plausible that the two have shared a recent common ancestor with a wide Holarctic range (for major differences between them see above). + +Maraenobiotus galassiae + +differs from + +M. slovenicus + +sp. nov. +(see above) and + +M. pescei + +sp. nov. +(see above) by much longer and cylindrical caudal rami, among other things. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/00/87/370087D9681D7C43FD88FED6FCFB153F.xml b/data/37/00/87/370087D9681D7C43FD88FED6FCFB153F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d18c6b7b3af --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/00/87/370087D9681D7C43FD88FED6FCFB153F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ + + + +A new subterranean Maraenobiotus (Crustacea: Copepoda) from Slovenia challenges the concept of polymorphic and widely distributed harpacticoids + + + +Author + +Brancelj, Anton +National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia; & School of Environmental Sciences, University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia; + + + +Author + +Karanovic, Tomislav +Department of Life Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea; & IMAS, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2015 + +2015-06-30 + + +49 + + +45 + + +2905 +2928 + + + +journal article +21105 +10.1080/00222933.2015.1022620 +77436b0e-9e7a-48e5-b280-dd9491c58b68 +1464-5262 +4002329 +92302CF9-21BA-4454-A3DD-337BB7152DCE + + + + + + +Maraenobiotus pescei + +sp. nov. + + + + + +[ + +partim.] + +Maraenobiotus vejdovskyi +Mrázek, 1893 + +– +Pesce et al. 1994 +: p. 83, figs. 1–10. + + + + + + +Type locality + + + +Italy +, +Abruzzo +, L’ Aquila, Gioia dei Marsi, temporary stream Fosso Perrone, a tributary of the river Sangro, epibenthic and interstitial habitat in organic detritus. + + + +Type material + + + + +Holotype +female +, illustrated by + +Pesce +et al. (1994) + +in their figures 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 10; + +allotype +male +, illustrated by +Pesce et al. (1994) +in their figures 3, 4, 6, 8; both from the +type +locality, originally deposited in the Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Università di L’ Aquila, Via Vetoio 14, 67100 Coppito, L’ Aquila, +Italy +. +Current +location the same, but condition not checked since the 2009 L’ +Aquila +earthquake which damaged many slides ( +Prof. Diana M. P. Galassi +, personal communication, + +July 2014 + +). [not examined] + + + + + +Etymology + + + +The species name is dedicated to Prof. Giuseppe Lucio Pesce, who discovered these specimens in +Italy +with his collaborators. The name is a noun in the genitive singular. + + + + + +Description + + + +Female as illustrated by +Pesce et al. (1994) +in their figures 1–10, as + +Maraenobiotus veydovskyi +Mrázek, 1893 + +. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +The female specimen of this Italian population has truncated principal caudal setae as in + +Maraenobiotus veydovskyi truncatus +Gurney, 1932 + +, and the caudal rami look very similar in shape and size, except that the Italian population has slightly smaller caudal rami in proportion to the anal somite. However, + +M. pescei + +sp. nov. +differs from + +M. vejdovskyi truncatus + +by much reduced (or absent) all lateral setae on the caudal rami, as well as by a much longer apophysis on the male Endp P3. + + + +Maraenobiotus pescei + +differs from + +M. slovenicus + +sp. nov. +also by very reduced (or absent) all lateral setae on the caudal rami, while the caudal rami of two other species from the + +M. vejdovskyi + +complex, + +M. ishidai + +sp. nov. +(see above) and + +M. galassiae + +sp. nov. +(see below), are cylindrical and much longer. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/00/87/370087D9681E7C43FE41FF49FBD71244.xml b/data/37/00/87/370087D9681E7C43FE41FF49FBD71244.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5993b0fa492 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/00/87/370087D9681E7C43FE41FF49FBD71244.xml @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@ + + + +A new subterranean Maraenobiotus (Crustacea: Copepoda) from Slovenia challenges the concept of polymorphic and widely distributed harpacticoids + + + +Author + +Brancelj, Anton +National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia; & School of Environmental Sciences, University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia; + + + +Author + +Karanovic, Tomislav +Department of Life Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea; & IMAS, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2015 + +2015-06-30 + + +49 + + +45 + + +2905 +2928 + + + +journal article +21105 +10.1080/00222933.2015.1022620 +77436b0e-9e7a-48e5-b280-dd9491c58b68 +1464-5262 +4002329 +92302CF9-21BA-4454-A3DD-337BB7152DCE + + + + + + +Maraenobiotus ishidai + +sp. nov. + + + + + +[ + +partim.] + +Maraenobiotus vejdovskyi +Mrázek + +– +Ishida 1987 +: p. 83, fig. +14n. + + + + + + +Type locality + + + + +Japan +, +Hokkaido +, +Yoichi +, +43.13° N +, +140.44° E +. Habitat data unknown + +. + + + +Type material + + + + +Holotype +female +illustrated by +Ishida (1987) +in his figure +14n +from the +type +locality, originally deposited in the author’ s private collection. Current location unknown. [not examined] + + + + + + +Etymology + + + +The species name is dedicated to late Dr Terue Ishida, who discovered this specimen from +Japan +. The name is a noun in the genitive singular. + + + + + +Description + + + +Female as illustrated by +Ishida (1987) +in his figure 14n, as + +Maraenobiotus veydovskyi +Mrázek. + + + + + + +Remarks + + + +This female specimen has truncated principal caudal setae as in + +Maraenobiotus veydovskyi truncatus +Gurney, 1932 + +, but the caudal rami look very different in shape and size. They are cylindrical in dorsal view and almost twice as long as wide in + +M. ishidai + +sp. nov. +, while the caudal rami in + +M. vejdovskyi truncatus + +are almost conical in shape and about as long as wide. Also, in the latter species the distal lateral caudal setae seem to be either much reduced in size or absent, while they are well developed in the former. Finally, the anal operculum is much longer in + +M. vejdovskyi truncatus + +than in + +M. ishidai + +. There is very little chance that these very disjunct populations, with so vastly different caudal rami and anal operculum, could belong to the same species. In fact, + +M. ishidai + +differs so much from the other four species of + +Maraenobiotus + +with truncated female caudal setae, which are all European, that we believe there is a strong argument for them to be separate species. Its caudal rami are most similar in shape to those of the Italian + +M. galassiae + +sp. nov. +(see below) and it may be plausible that the two have shared a recent common ancestor with a wide Holarctic range. Major differences involve the position of the dorsal caudal seta (nearly central in + +M. galassiae + +versus close to inner margin in + +M. ishidai + +), as well as the shape and inclination of the posterior margin of the ramus itself (convex and perpendicular to the body axis in + +M. ishidai + +versus straight and diagonal in + +M. galassiae + +). + +Maraenobiotus ishidai + +differs from + +M. slovenicus + +sp. nov. +(see above) and + +M. pescei + +sp. nov. +(see below) in the much longer and cylindrical caudal rami. + + +Unfortunately, we do not know which appendages illustrated by +Ishida (1987) +belong to this species, so they cannot be compared to other species from the + +M. vejdovskyi + +complex until the +holotype +has been found and redescribed. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/00/8F/37008F9045DF5615852D618C7DD10215.xml b/data/37/00/8F/37008F9045DF5615852D618C7DD10215.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..11702989214 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/00/8F/37008F9045DF5615852D618C7DD10215.xml @@ -0,0 +1,433 @@ + + + +Three new species of dragon pseudoscorpions (Pseudoscorpiones, Pseudotyrannochthoniidae) from China + + + +Author + +Hou, Yanmeng +0000-0003-0059-3419 +College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, 105 Xisanhuanbeilu, Haidian District, Beijing 100048, China & The Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, College of Life sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, China + + + +Author + +Zhang, Feng +0000-0002-3347-1031 +The Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, College of Life sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, China + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2024 + +2024-06-04 + + +1204 + + +135 +154 + + + +journal article +298082 +10.3897/zookeys.1204.111842 +fb1e044e-9149-4837-8df1-c9ea3e5fdbc7 +41A41142-ED13-4322-8B86-3681C2FAE4F3 + + + + + +Spelaeochthonius huanglaoensis + +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 1 +, +5 +, +6 +, +7 +, +8 + + + + +Chinese name. + +黄老穴伪蝎. + + + +Type material. + + + + +Holotype + +: +China +• +♂ +; +Beijing City +, +Fangshan District +, +Shidu Town +, +Wanglaopu Village +, +Huanglao Cave +; + +39 ° 40.916 ′ N +, +115 ° 39.041 ′ E + +; + +495 m +a. s. l. + +; + +19 Oct. 2021 + +; +Nana Zhan +leg.; +under a stone in the deep zone +(Fig. +1 +); Ps. - + +MHBU + +- +BJFS-21-10-19-02-01 + +. + + +Paratype + +: • +1 ♀ +; same data as for holotype; Ps. - + +MHBU + +- +BJFS-21-10-19-02-02 + +. + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +( +♂ +♀ +). + + +Spelaeochthonius huanglaoensis + +sp. nov. +is most similar to + +S. wulibeiensis +Gao, Hou & Zhang, 2023 + +, but differs from it in having shorter pedipalps (e. g. chela 7.94 ( +♂ +), 6.14 ( +♀ +) × vs 6.21–6.22 ( +♂ +), 5.68 ( +♀ +) × longer than broad, length 1.43 ( +♂ +), 1.72 ( +♀ +) mm vs 1.68–1.74 ( +♂ +), 1.76 ( +♀ +) mm), 1 additional cheliceral seta (seven vs six), and more numerous fixed chelal finger teeth (29 vs 22–24). It differs from + +S. yinae +Li, +2023 in + +the number of setae on tergite II (four vs two), smaller body size (e. g. chela 7.94 ( +♂ +), 6.14 ( +♀ +) × vs 5.93 ( +♂ +), 6.30 ( +♀ +) × longer than broad, length 1.43 ( +♂ +), 1.72 ( +♀ +) mm vs 1.72 ( +♂ +), 1.89 ( +♀ +) mm), and more numerous fixed chelal finger teeth ( +♂ +) (29 vs 23). + + + + +Etymology. + +The species is named after its type locality, Huanglao Cave. + + + +Description. + + +Adult male +(Figs +5 A +, +6 A – E +, +7 +). +Colour +: generally pale yellow; chelicerae, pedipalps and tergites slightly darker; soft parts pale. +Cephalothorax +(Figs +6 A, C +, +7 A +): carapace inverted-trapezoid, 1.04 × longer than broad, gently narrowed posteriorly; surface mostly with fine reticulations; with four anterior lyrifissures and two posterior lyrifissures; no traces of eyes but eye region bulging and convex in dorsal view; epistome present and with some tiny spinules; with 16 setae arranged s 4 s: 4: 2: 2: 2, most setae heavy, long, and gently curved. Chaetotaxy of coxae: P 3, I 6, II 5, III 4–5, IV 4; manducatory process with two acuminate distal setae, anterior seta less than 1 / 2 length of medial seta (refer to female, Fig. +8 C +); coxal spines present on coxa I only, comprising a transverse, contiguous series of six or seven tridentate blades, which arise from a lightly sclerotized or translucent hillock, the central ramus of each blade (except the basal one) sharply acumino-spatulate and extending beyond the lateral rami (refer to female, Fig. +8 A +); a small, bisetose intercoxal tubercle present between coxae III and IV (Fig. +6 C +). +Chelicera +(Figs +6 B +, +7 B, C +): large, approximately as long as carapace, 2.50 × longer than broad; six setae and two lyrifissures (exterior condylar lyrifissure and exterior lyrifissure) present on hand, movable finger with one medial seta, all setae acuminate, ventrobasal seta shorter than others. Cheliceral palm with moderate hispid granulation on both ventral and dorsal sides. Both fingers with well-developed teeth, fixed finger with 14 acute teeth, distal one largest; movable finger with 11 retrorse contiguous teeth of equal length; galea absent. Serrula exterior with 19 blades (refer to female, Fig. +8 B +) and serrula interior with 15 blades. Rallum in two rows and composed of ten finely pinnate blades (11 blades in female), of which the basal-most blade shorter than the others (Figs +7 C +, +8 D +). +Pedipalp +(Figs +6 D +, +7 D – F +): surfaces mostly with fine reticulations; long and slender, trochanter 1.87, femur 6.38, patella 2.69, chela 7.94, hand 3.00 × longer than broad; femur 2.37 × longer than patella; movable chelal finger 1.69 × longer than hand and 0.64 × longer than chela. Setae generally long and acuminate; one distal lyrifissure present on patella (Fig. +7 E +). Chelal palm slightly constricted towards fingers. Fixed chelal finger and hand with eight trichobothria plus duplex trichobothrium ( +dt +), movable chelal finger with four trichobothria, +ib +, +isb +, +eb +, +esb +, and +ist +clustered at the base of fixed finger, +esb +slightly distal to +ist +; +it +slightly distal to +est +, situated subdistally and forming a pair; +et +situated subdistally, very close to chelal teeth; +dt +situated distal to +et +, near the tip of fixed finger; +sb +distinctly closer to +b +than to +st +(Fig. +7 D +). Microsetae (chemosensory setae) absent on hand and both palpal fingers. Sensilla absent. Both chelal fingers with a row of teeth, homodentate, spaced regularly along the margin, larger and well-spaced teeth present in the middle of the row, becoming smaller and closer distally and proximally: fixed chelal finger with 29 teeth, slightly retrorse and pointed; movable chelal finger with 19 teeth (slightly smaller than teeth on fixed chelal finger) (Figs +6 D +, +7 D +). Chelal fingers slightly curved in dorsal view (Fig. +7 F +). +Opisthosoma +: generally typical, ovate, pleural membrane finely granulated. Tergites and sternites undivided; setae uniseriate and acuminate. Tergal chaetotaxy I – XII: 2: 4: 4: 5: 7: 7: 7: 6: 5: 4: TT: 0. Sternal chaetotaxy III – XII: 9: 8: 10: 9: 10: 9: 7: 8: 0: 2. Anterior genital operculum with nine setae, genital opening pit-like, with seven marginal setae on each side, +23 in +total (Fig. +6 E +). +Legs +(Fig. +7 G, H +): generally typical, long, and slender. Fine granulation present on anterodorsal faces of patella IV. Femur of leg I 1.73 × longer than patella and with one lyrifissure at the base of femur; tarsus 2.24 × longer than tibia. Femoropatella of leg IV 3.04 × longer than deep and with one lyrifissure at the base of femur; tibia 5.80 × longer than deep; with a long tactile seta on both tarsal segments: basitarsus 3.86 × longer than deep (TS = 0.37), telotarsus 11.40 × longer than deep and 2.11 × longer than basitarsus (TS = 0.35). Arolium slightly shorter than the claws, not divided; claws simple. +Dimensions of adult male +(length / breadth or, in the case of the legs, length / depth in mm). Body length 1.80. Pedipalps: trochanter 0.28 / 0.15, femur 1.02 / 0.16, patella 0.43 / 0.16, chela 1.43 / 0.18, hand 0.54 / 0.18, movable finger length 0.91. Chelicera 0.55 / 0.22, movable finger length 0.28. Carapace 0.53 / 0.51. Leg I: trochanter 0.21 / 0.15, femur 0.52 / 0.09, patella 0.30 / 0.08, tibia 0.25 / 0.06, tarsus 0.56 / 0.05. Leg IV: trochanter 0.27 / 0.15, femoropatella 0.70 / 0.23, tibia 0.58 / 0.10, basitarsus 0.27 / 0.07, telotarsus 0.57 / 0.05. + + + + + + + +Spelaeochthonius huanglaoensis + +sp. nov. +A +holotype male, habitus (dorsal view) +B +paratype female, habitus (dorsal view). Scale bars: 0.50 mm. + + + + + + + + +Spelaeochthonius huanglaoensis + +sp. nov. +A +carapace (dorsal view) +B +left chelicera (dorsal view) +C +coxae (ventral view) +D +left chela (lateral view) +E +male genital area (ventral view) +F +female genital area (ventral view). Scale bars: 0.20 mm ( +C, D +); 0.10 mm ( +A, B, E, F +). + + + + + + + + +Spelaeochthonius huanglaoensis + +sp. nov. +, holotype male +A +carapace (dorsal view) +B +left chelicera (dorsal view), with details of teeth +C +rallum +D +left chela (lateral view), with details of trichobothrial pattern +E +left pedipalp (minus chela, dorsal view) +F +left chela (dorsal view) +G +leg I (lateral view) +H +leg IV (lateral view). Scale bars: 0.20 mm. + + + +Adult female +(Figs +5 B +, +6 F +, +8 +). Mostly same as male; tergal chaetotaxy I – XII: 2: 4: 4: 5: 6: 6: 6: 6: 5: 4: TT: 0; sternal chaetotaxy IV – XII: 5: 6: 8: 8: 9: 9: 8: 0: 2; anterior genital operculum with five setae, posterior margin with six marginal setae, +11 in +total; leg IV with a long tactile seta on both tarsal segments: basitarsus 3.44 × longer than deep (TS = 0.35), telotarsus 9.86 × longer than deep and 2.23 × longer than basitarsus (TS = 0.36). Body length 1.86. Pedipalps: trochanter 0.35 / 0.19 (1.84 ×), femur 1.20 / 0.20 (6.00 ×), patella 0.52 / 0.21 (2.48 ×), chela 1.72 / 0.28 (6.14 ×), hand 0.62 / 0.28 (2.21 ×), movable chelal finger length 1.09. Chelicera 0.81 / 0.33 (2.45 ×), movable finger length 0.41. Carapace 0.69 / 0.74 (0.93 ×). Leg I: trochanter 0.22 / 0.14 (1.57 ×), femur 0.56 / 0.08 (7.00 ×), patella 0.37 / 0.08 (4.63 ×), tibia 0.32 / 0.07 (4.57 ×), tarsus 0.68 / 0.06 (11.33 ×). Leg IV: trochanter 0.31 / 0.18 (1.72 ×), femoropatella 0.82 / 0.28 (2.93 ×), tibia 0.68 / 0.11 (6.18 ×), basitarsus 0.31 / 0.09 (3.44 ×), telotarsus 0.69 / 0.07 (9.86 ×). + + + + + + + +Spelaeochthonius huanglaoensis + +sp. nov. +scanning electron micrographs, paratype female +A +coxal spines in overview, with details of tips +B +serrula exterior +C +manducatory process +D +rallum. Scale bars: 50 μm ( +C, D +); 20 μm ( +B +); 10 μm ( +A +). + + + + + +Distribution. + + +China +( +Beijing +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/01/02/37010203C3CCB1ABC99532E73FCA36E8.xml b/data/37/01/02/37010203C3CCB1ABC99532E73FCA36E8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0cf8eba5672 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/01/02/37010203C3CCB1ABC99532E73FCA36E8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Lentibulariaceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +970 +976 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Pinguicula grandiflora +Lam. subsp. +grandiflora + + + + + +Artbeschreibung: +Aehnlich +wie + +P. vulgaris + +, aber +Blueten +tief violettblau bis lila, oft mit dunklen Adern, + +2,5-3,5 cm +lang, Sporn mehr als halb so lang wie die +uebrige +Krone + +, Abschnitte der Unterlippe gestutzt, sich teilweise +ueberdeckend +, Rand oft wellig, Fruchtkapsel +kegelfoermig +. + + + + +Bluetezeit +: 6-7 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz: Nasse, bemooste Felsen, +Bachraender +, Weiden / montan-subalpin / JS (La +Dole +, Le Noirmont). (Reculet-Kette) + + + + +Verbreitung global: +Westeuropaeisch + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F +sehr feucht; fFeuchtigkeit stark wechselnd (mehr als ++/- +2 Stufen) +Lichtzahl LhellSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rschwach sauer bis neutral (pH 4.5-7.5)Temperaturzahl T +subalpin ( +Fichtenwaelder +ohne Buchen bis zur Obergrenze der Fichte) +
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +sehr +naehrstoffarm + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subozeanisch (hohe Luftfeuchtigkeit, geringe Temperaturschwankungen, eher milde Winter)
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: + +Grossbluetiges +Fettblatt + +, + +Grossbluetiges +Fettkraut + +Nom +francais +: + +Grassette +a +grandes fleurs + +Nome italiano: +Erba unta con grandi fiori + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/01/6A/37016AF84BA88A63588E647739A13E98.xml b/data/37/01/6A/37016AF84BA88A63588E647739A13E98.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c9817f33a62 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/01/6A/37016AF84BA88A63588E647739A13E98.xml @@ -0,0 +1,354 @@ + + + +Scarabaeinae dung beetles from Ecuador: a catalog, nomenclatural acts, and distribution records + + + +Author + +Chamorro, William + + + +Author + +Marin-Armijos, Diego + + + +Author + +senjo, Angelico + + + +Author + +Vaz-De-Mello, Fernando Z. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +826 + + +1 +343 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.826.26488 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.826.26488 +1313-2970-826-1 +B1550A3AE54744509A44BC4366D5E110 + + + + +Canthon (Canthon) aberrans (Harold, 1868) +Plate 11B + + + + +Deltochilum aberrans +Harold, 1868d: 8 (original description. Type locality: Columbia [= Colombia]). + + +Deltochilum aberrans +: +Gemminger and Harold 1869 +: 995 (list, distribution); +Harold 1880a +: 18 (distribution); +Kolbe 1893 +: 191 (diagnosis); +Gillet 1911a +: 35 (complete list of species); +Campos 1921 +: 55 (cited for Ecuador); +Blackwelder 1944 +: 202 (list of species of Latin America); + +Solis +and Kohlmann 2002 + +: 5 (cited as +Canthon aberrans +(Harold, 1868), synonym). + + +Paedhyboma aberrans +: +Shipp 1897 +: 195 (transferred to the genus +Paedhyboma +Kolbe, 1893); +Paulian 1939 +: 21 (redescription, distribution); +Balthasar 1941 +: 345 (cited for Peru); + +Martinez +1947 + +: 113 (cited as synonym of +Deltochilum aberrans +Harold, 1868); +Contreras 1951 +: 221 (cited for Colombia); +Balthasar 1951 +: 330 (cited for Peru); +Vulcano and Pereira 1964 +: 636 (catalog of species); +Vulcano and Pereira 1967 +: 551 (characters in key); + +Solis +and Kohlmann 2002 + +: 5 (synonym of +Canthon aberrans +Harold). + + +Canthon aberrans +: + +Pereira and +D'Andretta +1955a + +: 48 (transferred to the genus +Canthon +Hoffmannsegg, 1817); +Ratcliffe et al. 2015 +: 195 (cited for Peru). + + +Canthon (Canthon) aberrans +: + +Halffter and +Martinez +1977 + +: 87 (transferred to the subgenus +Canthon +s. str.); +Vaz-de-Mello 2000 +: 191 (cited for Brazil); +Medina et al. 2001 +: 135 (cited for Colombia); + +Solis +and Kohlmann 2002 + +: 4 (characters in key), 5 (redescription); +Ratcliffe 2002 +: 12 (cited for Panama); +Medina et al. 2003 +: 64 (distribution); +Hamel-Leigue et al. 2006 +: 13 (cited for Bolivia); +Carvajal et al. 2011 +: 314-315 (cited for Ecuador); +Krajcik 2012 +: 63 (complete list of species); + +Solis +and Kohlmann 2012 + +: 3 (cited for Costa Rica); +Chamorro et al. 2018 +: 85 (figure 8A), 87 (figure 10H), 92 (cited for Ecuador). + + +Canthon bifurcatus +Robinson, 1948a: 37 (original description); + +Martinez +1951a + +: 23 (distribution, synonym of +Canthon juanae +Martinez +, 1949); +Pereira 1953 +: 394 (synonym of +Paedhyboma aberrans +(Harold, 1968)); + +Pereira and +D'Andretta +1955a + +: 48 (cited as +Canthon aberrans +(Harold, 1968), synonym); + +Solis +and Kohlmann 2002 + +: 5 (cited as synonym of +Canthon aberrans +Harold); + +Solis +and Kohlmann 2012 + +: 3 (cited as synonym of +Canthon aberrans +Harold). + + +Canthon juanae +Martinez +, 1949b: 176 (original description); + +Martinez +1951a + +: 23 (synonym of +Canthon bifurcatus +Martinez +, 1951); +Pereira 1953 +: 394 (cited as synonym of +Canthon plicatipennis +Blanchard, 1843); + +Pereira and +D'Andretta +1955a + +: 48 (cited as +Canthon aberrans +(Harold, 1968), synonym); + +Solis +and Kohlmann 2002 + +: 5 (cited as +Canthon (Canthon) aberrans +(Harold), synonym); + +Solis +and Kohlmann 2012 + +: 3 (cited as +Canthon aberrans +(Harold, 1868), synonym). + + + +Type specimens. + +Deltochilum aberrans +Harold, 1868. One syntype examined deposited at the MNHN (ex coll. E Harold and R Oberthur). Lectotype to be designated in a future work on this species group. + + +Canthon bifurcatus +Robinson, 1948. The holotype (♀) is deposited at the USNM. Locality: Merida Venezuela. Examined. + +Holotype (♀): "Merida / Venezuela [p]", "♀ [p]", "TypeNo / 65620 / U S N M [p and hw, red label]", "M.Robinson / Collection / 1959 [p]", "HOLOTYPE / Canthon / bifurcatus / Mark Robinson [p]". + +Canthon juanae +Martinez +, 1949. The holotype (♂) is deposited in the AMIC (see + +Martinez +1949b + +: 179) [= name-bearing types now in the MACN]. Locality: Bolivia. Dep. La Paz. Nor Yungas Rios Carioco, Choro, Dalem. 700 m. Not examined. + +Two paratypes are deposited in CEMT. Examined. + +Paratype (♀): "BOLIVIA / Dep. La Paz / Pcia. Nor Yungas / +Rios +Carioco, Choro / Dalen 700 mts. / Coll. +Martinez +/ Ene-949 [hw]", "PARATIPO ♀ [hw, green label, black margin]", "Canthon / juanae ♀ / sp.n. / A. +MARTINEZ-DET +.1949 [p and hw, green label, black margin]". + + +Paratype (♂): "BOLIVIA / Dep. La Paz / Pcia. Nor Yungas / +Rios +Carioco, Choro / Dalen 700 mts. / Coll. +Martinez +/ Ene-949 [hw]", "PARATIPO ♂ [hw, green label, black margin]", "Canthon / juanae ♂ / sp.n. / A. +MARTINEZ-DET +.1949 [p and hw, green label, black margin]". + + + +Distribution. +Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela. + + + +Records +examined. + + +COTOPAXI: Bosque Integral Otonga, 1300 m (3 specimens CEMT; 152 specimens MQCAZ); La Mana (5 specimens MQCAZ). IMBABURA: +Junin +La Mina (7 specimens MQCAZ). EL ORO: +Pinas +, 1200 m (18 specimens MQCAZ). ESMERALDAS: Los Ajos (8 specimens MQCAZ; 3 specimens MECN); Palma Real (19 specimens MQCAZ; 10 specimens MECN); San Francisco, 20 m (4 specimens MQCAZ); Ricuaute (7 specimens MQCAZ; 1 specimen MECN); Santa Rita (3 specimens MQCAZ). +MANABI +: El Carmen, 600 m (2 specimens MQCAZ). MORONA SANTIAGO: Alshi 9 de Octubre, Rio Upano, 1500 m (2 specimens MUTPL); Gualaquiza (3 specimens MQCAZ); +Limon +Indanza (2 specimens MQCAZ); Macas, 1000 m (2 specimens MQCAZ). NAPO: Archidona (4 specimens MQCAZ); Cosanga (7 specimens MQCAZ); El Reventador (1 specimen MUTPL); El Reventador, Cascada de San Rafael (8 specimens MQCAZ); Los Guacamayos Piviyacu, 1800 m (4 specimens CEMT); Misahualli, 500 m (3 specimens MQCAZ); Parahuacu (2 specimens MECN); Puente +Rio +Azuela, road Baeza-Lago Agrio (7 specimens MQCAZ); +Rio +Hollin +, 1100 m (4 specimens CEMT); San Rafael (6 specimens MQCAZ); Tena Talag, 750 m (2 specimens MQCAZ). ORELLANA: El Coca (1 specimen MQCAZ); Loreto (5 specimens MQCAZ). PICHINCHA: Chiriboga (8 specimens MQCAZ); Chiriboga km 59 (3 specimens MQCAZ); +Estacion +Biologica +Maquipucuna, 1250 m (3 specimens MUTPL); Hda Las Palmeras km 57 (4 specimens MQCAZ); Jerusalen (1 specimen MQCAZ); Mindo, 1400-1650 m (4 specimens CEMT); Nanegalito, 1800 m (19 specimens MQCAZ); Pampas Argentinas, 1300 m (8 specimens MQCAZ); Puerto Quito (3 specimens MQCAZ); Puerto Quito km 113 (1 specimen MQCAZ); San Vicente km 4, La Armenia, 1800 m (3 specimens MQCAZ); road +Calacali + + +Nanegalito, 2000 m (5 specimens MQCAZ); road Chiriboga-Santo Domingo (1 specimen MQCAZ); Tandayapa (3 specimens MQCAZ); +Yaruqui +, 2700 m (2 specimens MQCAZ); road to Nanegalito km 37 El Vergel, 1600 m (1 specimen CEMT). SANTO DOMINGO DE LOS +TSACHILAS +: ECR Guajalito (25 specimens MQCAZ); +Rio +Toachi (3 specimens MQCAZ); Santo Domingo (7 specimens MQCAZ). +SUCUMBIOS +: La Bonita, 1800 m (3 specimens MQCAZ); Limoncocha (1 specimen MQCAZ); El Reventador (2 specimens MQCAZ); road La +Alegria-La +Bonita km 32 (2 specimens MECN). TUNGURAHUA: +Banos +(1 specimen MQCAZ); +Banos +El Topo, 1530 m (3 specimens MUTPL); San Francisco (5 specimens MQCAZ); ZAMORA CHINCHIPE: El Pangui (4 specimens MUTPL); RVS El Zarza campamento las +Penas +, Cordillera del +Condor +, 1710 m (4 specimens MUTPL); Guaguaymi, 2000 m (1 specimen CEMT); San Andres, 1850 m (3 specimens MQCAZ); Tundayme campamento Mirador La Mina, 1320 m (2 specimens MUTPL). + + + +Temporal data. +Collected every month of the year. + + +Remarks. +Inhabits coastal lowland evergreen forests and coastal evergreen foothill forests from 20-1250 m a.s.l. In the Andean region, it was registered in the lower montane forests and the montane cloud forests from 1300-2300 m a.s.l. In the Amazon, it was registered on the foothill evergreen forests from 500-1100 m a.s.l. Collected with pitfall traps baited with human feces and occassionally in mouse carrion. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/01/80/37018028B883CAF7021CDDF121ECEB1A.xml b/data/37/01/80/37018028B883CAF7021CDDF121ECEB1A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..af06b341155 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/01/80/37018028B883CAF7021CDDF121ECEB1A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ + + + +Marine Gastrotricha of the Near East: 1. Fourteen new species of Macrodasyida and a redescription of Dactylopodola agadasys Hochberg, 2003 + + + +Author + +Hummon, William D. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +94 + + +1 +59 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.94.794 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.94.794 +1313-2970-94-1 + + + + +Dendrodasys rubomarinus +sp. n. +Figure 5 + + + + +Dendrodasys +EgyA +Hummon (2009) +[E Med & Red Sea Database]. + + + +Diagnosis: + +Adult 272 +µm +; PhJIn at U20. Body slender; head has crescent-shaped anterior, with protruding mouth and laterally directed lobes that have rounded tips, with a knob-shaped pestle organ on each side lying largely exposed beneath the rear of the head lobes; neck constriction slight, marking the pharyngeal pore openings; trunk parallel-sided, narrowing gradually in the rear, ending in a long, narrow caudal peduncle, with a bifurcate apex that indents medially to U90; pharynx short, pharyngeal pores basal; intestine narrows fore to aft; anus ventral at U68. Glands 7 per side, with another medially in the caudal peduncle; longitudinal muscles are striated. TbA 1 per side, with a duo-gland tube extending forward from a tapering base; TbL absent; TbP 3 per side, the longer one, arising from the caudal base, and the shorter two, arising from the bifurcate tip of the caudum. Mouth diameter narrow, protruding forward from anterior head curvature; small goblet-shaped buccal cavity moderately cuticularized; pharyngial pores located at the level of the neck constriction, and only detected with maturity; intestine broader in front, narrower behind, its lumen fringed by actively-beating cilia; anus ventral at U68. Locomotor ciliation forms paired longitudinal +bands +from the TbA rearward, joining behind the anus and continuing as a unified band onto the caudal peduncle, with a patch lying just before the bifurca. Hermaphroditic; paired testes lie along the fore-gut and paired ovaries along the rear mid-gut, eggs maturing rear to front; an ovoid frontal organ bearing active sperm occurs opposite the largest ovum on the right side. + + + +Description: + +Adult Lt 244-272 +µm +; LPh 48-53 +µm +to PhJIn at U20 (Fig. 5). Body flattened ventrally, vaulted dorsally, comprised of head that is crescent-shaped anteriorly, with laterally directed lobes that have rounded tips and a protruding mouth, with a knob-shaped cephalic pestle organ (L 7 +µm +) on each side that lies largely exposed beneath the rear of the head lobes; neck constriction slight, marking the pharyngeal pore openings; neck constriction slight; the trunk is parallel-sided trunk, narrowing gradually in the rear, ending in a long, narrow caudal peduncle, with a bifurcate apex that indents medially to U90. Width of head /lobes /neck /trunk /caudal base are as follows: 28 /38 /21 /26-28 /7 +µm +at U08 /U04 /U18 /U31-U55 /U73, respectively. Glands are of two types, one with 4 per side, oval in shape (diam 4-6 +µm +) at U05 /U13 /U26 /U62 and a solitary medial gland on the caudal peduncle at U87, the other with 3 per side, ragged in shape and more refringent (diam 3 +µm +) at U21 /U42 /U65. + + +Adhesive tubes: TbA 1 per side (L 18 +µm +), comprising a long (6 +µm +) duo-gland tube extending forward from a heavy tapering base that inserts directly on the body surface, tubes being highly mobile and able to project laterally; TbL are absent; TbP 3 per side: one longer (L 12 +µm +) arising proximally from the caudal peduncle, and two shorter (L 5 & 9 +µm +) arising from the bifurcate tips of the 80 +µm +long pedunculated caudum. + + +Ventral ciliation: Head lobes bear a transverse row of cilia ventrally (L 8µm); head bears numerous cilia (L 10-25 +µm +) frontally, laterally and dorsally; sensory hairs 7 each per side occur in lateral (L 8-10 +µm +) and dorsal (L the first 26-28, others 14-16 +µm +) columns, lateral cilia occurring singly, dorsal cilia occurring in pairs, all spaced more or less evenly from U08 to U70, behind which are single lateral hairs on either side at U76 and U90 on the caudal peduncle. Locomotor ciliation runs in paired longitudinal bands from the TbA rearward, joining behind the anus and continuing as a unified band onto the caudal peduncle, with a patch lying just before the bifurca. + + +Digestive tract: Mouth diameter narrow (2 +µm +), protruding forward from the anterior head curvature; a goblet-shaped buccal cavity is moderately cuticularized; pharynx narrow, its basal pores located at the level of the neck constriction, and only detected with maturity; intestine narrow, broader in front, narrowing markedly half way along its length, but with a bulge around the anus, its lumen being fringed by actively-beating cilia; anus ventral at U68. + + +Reproductive tract: Simultaneous hermaphrodites; testes paired, but uneven in origin, along the fore-gut, its vasa deferentia extending rearward, but their termini not seen; sperm (L 25 +µm +) show half a spirally thickened head and half a flagellum; ovaries, with several (3-7) immature ovules, are located along the rear mid-gut, with the most mature ova developing medially forward between ovary and testes; an ovoid frontal organ bearing active sperm occurs opposite the largest ovum on the right side. + + + +Figure 5. +Dendrodasys rubomarinus +sp. n. dorsal and ventral views of a mature adult (Lt=272, LPh=53 +µm +) from Giftun Island SE, near Hurghada, Egypt; dorsal with body conformation, dorsal and lateral body cilia and pattern of glands; ventral with digestive and reproductive tracts, pestle organs, adhesive tubes and locomotor ciliary bands. + + + + +Ecology: +Occasional (10-30% of samples) in frequency of occurrence, scarce to prevalent (3% to more than 30% of a sample, the latter sometimes a co-dominant [cdom]) in abundance; littoral in clean fine to coarse, well- to poorly sorted coralline sands at low water neap to low water spring; sublittoral in medium-fine to medium, well to medium sorted, clean coralline sands, often mixed with shell and coral gravel, at 1-5 m water depth. + + +Geographical distribution: + +RED SEA:EGYPT: {Sharm el-Arab Inside, Marsa Bareika N, ^Giftun Island SE ( +27°10'N +, +33°57'E +) [cdom] [video], Main Beach Ras Mohamed NP [2-videos], Nabq [video]}. + + + +Remarks: + +There are four video sequences of +Dendrodasys rubomarinus +sp. n., all from the Red Sea in Egypt. All four are available as MPEG 2 (and MPEG 1) from +Hummon (2009) +: #797 a mature Lectotype adult of Lt=272 +µm +(LPh=53 +µm +), collected in June 1994 from Giftun Island SE, near Hurghada, Egypt; #800 a mature adult of Lt=258 +µm +(LPh=51 +µm +) from Main Beach Ras Mohamed National Park, S. Sinai, Egypt; #799 a mature adult of Lt=244 +µm +(LPh=48 +µm +) also from Main Beach; and the other #798 a subadult of Lt=152 +µm +(LPh=35 +µm +) from Nabq, Egypt, also on the S. Sinai. The hind-gut is often found bearing diatom frustules. + + + +Etymology: + +Rubomarinus (Latin: ruber + marinus = meaning 'red +sea' +) refers to the body of water in which it was found, the Red Sea. + + + +Taxonomic affinities: + +Dendrodasys rubomarinus +sp. n. is the only member of the genus with rounded head lobes and pestle organs that are knob-like, that also has the neck constriction occurring at the pharyngeal pores, rather than behind the pharyngeal pores, and has bi-lateral testes. Two of the other four species closely resemble +Dendrodasys rubomarinus +, but differ in detail: +Dendrodasys gracilis +Wilke, 1954 has rounded head lobes, pyriform pestle organs and bi-lateral testes, while +Dendrodasys affinis +Wilke, 1954 [see also +Hummon et al. (1998) +] has rounded head lobes, lobiform pestle organs, and uni-lateral testes. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/01/89/3701896C8B02FFD3FF6FFB7C0CD9FE71.xml b/data/37/01/89/3701896C8B02FFD3FF6FFB7C0CD9FE71.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..264ce7dffe4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/01/89/3701896C8B02FFD3FF6FFB7C0CD9FE71.xml @@ -0,0 +1,289 @@ + + + +A new species of Prosopistoma Latreille, 1833 (Ephemeroptera: Prosopistomatidae) from South India + + + +Author + +Balachandran, Chellapandian + + + +Author + +Anbalagan, Sankarappan + + + +Author + +Kannan, Mani + + + +Author + +Dinakaran, Sundaram + + + +Author + +Krishnan, Muthukalingan + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4178 + + +2 + + +289 +294 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4178.2.7 +e232b03b-a1ee-4324-b00d-bd4a1d0ebd57 +1175-5326 +259752 +3DDDC24E-8312-4304-9230-1DE4A2E96195 + + + + + + + +Prosopistoma coorgum +Balachandran and Anbalagan + +, +new species + + + + +( +Figs. 2–4 +) + + + + + + + +Type + +series. + +Holotype +(deposited in ethanol): 1 mature nymph, +INDIA +, +Kaveri River +, +Kushalnagar +, +Coorg district +, +Karnataka +state, + + +18-I- +2015 + + +, 829 m (12º44′.80″ N, 75º96′.97″E), collected by +S. Anbalagan +& +C. Balachandran + +. + +Paratypes +(deposited in ethanol): 1 mature nymph on slide and 8 mature nymphs, same data as holotype; 4 nymphs, +India +, +Kaveri River +, +Madikeri +, +Coorg district +, +Karnataka +state, + +19-I-2015 + +, 1020 m ( +12º42′N +, +75º73′E +) ( +Coll. S. +Anbalagan & +C. Balachandran +, +Department +of +Environmental Biotechnology +, +Bharathidasan University +, +Catalogue +number: PS012). + + + + + + +Description. +Mature Nymph + +( +Fig. 2 +). Body length +3.4–3.8 mm +, excluding caudal filaments. Head yellow dorsally with a U-shape brown marking encompassing median ocellus. Epicranial sutures evident, passing through anterior margin of lateral ocelli, and between compound eyes and antennal bases, continuing to lateral margin of head. Carapace ( +Figs. 2 +A, 2C) general coloration medium brown, light yellowish brown around edges of carapace along flange, width 1.1 times longer than length measured along median suture; four distinctive orange markings present on each side of the midline: one on lateral region and three close to the mid line; proportional lengths of anterior, middle and posterior markings 1.00:.0.44:0.16. Cuticle of carapace finely punctuated. Distal end of carapace concave over exhalent notch ( +Figs. 2 +A, 2C). + + +Head. +Width 4.5 times longer than length. Antennae ( +Fig. 3 +A) composed of 6 segments, slightly longer than distance from antennal base to anterior margin of head; segment (scape) usually retracts into head capsule, making it invisible; segment III the longest, about 2.4–3.2 times the combined length of segments IV–VI. Labrum ( +Fig. 3 +B) protrudes apicomedially with surface punctated, approximately 2.9 times wider at its midpoint than long, anterior margin fringed with dense fine setae. Left and right mandibles similar. Outer canine of mandibles ( +Fig. 3 +C) slightly longer than inner canine with three apical teeth, outer tooth small and outer margin serrated near apex with 2–3 small short spines, inner tooth larger with margin serrated near apex with 3 small spines; inner canine ( +Fig. 3 +D) with two apical teeth, inner tooth a little larger, outer margin smooth; inner margin serrated near apex with 2–3 spines; two long serrated bristles arising from base of inner canine; a single stout seta present lateromedially on each mandible. Maxillae ( +Fig. 3 +E) crowned by rigid canine and three subequal dentisetae; three long feathered setae with stout bristles arising from base of apical canine and dentisetae on galea-lacinia. A single unserrated bristle arising about two-thirds of way down the sclerotized section of galea-lacinia. Maxillary palpi ( +Fig. 3 +E) 3- segmented, segments II the longest, length ratio of maxillary palp segments from basal one to apical: 3.3:4.8:1. Labium composed of pre and postmentum ( +Fig. 3 +F & G); prementum trapezoid, cutting edge with fine teeth; scalelike structures present along basal margin of postmentum. Labial palpi ( +Fig. 3 +F) 3-segmented, length ratio of labial palpus segments from basal one to apical 2:2.5:1. + + + +FIGURE 2. +Mature Nymph of + +Prosopistoma coorgum + + +sp. n. + +A, dorsal view (photography); B, ventral view (photography). C, dorsal view (line drawing); D, ventral view (line drawing). Scale bar 1 mm. + + + + +FIGURE 3. +Mature Nymph of + +Prosopistoma coorgum + + +sp. n. + +A, antenna (excluding the scape); B, labrum; C, mandible; D, details of canines in mandible; E, maxilla; F, labial palpi with prementum; G, postmentum. Scale bar 0.05 mm. + + + +Legs +( +Figs. 4 +A). Dorsal margin of fore femur with 8–10 simple, short setae; ventral margin of fore tibia with 6–8 pectinate setae ( +Fig. 4 +A). Mid and hind tibia each with one pair of stout distal setae, one pectinate seta, and a smooth seta ( +Fig. 4 +B). Ventral and basal half surface of all femora with dense scale-like structures ( +Fig. 4 +A); mid and hind femora with scale-like covering along the dorsal and ventral surface. All claws slender and smooth without denticles. + + + +FIGURE 4. +From mature nymph of + +Prosopistoma coorgum + + +sp. n. + +A, fore leg; B, tibia of middle leg; C-F, gills I-IV. Scale bar 0.2 mm. + + + +Abdomen. +Abdominal gills as in figures 4C–F. Gill I with long lamellate with bifurcate upper portion, lower portion divided into ribbons, many of which branch dichotomously ( +Fig. 4 +C); gill II leaf-like and cleft ( +Fig. 4 +D), covering the gills III–V ( +Figs. 4 +E & F), gill VI tiny, unbranched. Posterolateral projections of abdominal segments VII–IX broad, apex pointed ( +Fig. 2 +A). The three caudal filaments are short and retractile as in all +Prosopistomatidae +. + + +Imago. +Unknown. + + + + +Etymology. +The species is named after the place of collection, Coorg. + + +Habitat. + +P. coorgum + + +sp. n. + +nymphs were associated with boulders and pebbles, and they coexist with nymphs of + +Choroterpes +Eaton, 1881 + +, + +Thalerosphyrus +Eaton, 1881 + +and + +Platybaetis +Muller-Liebenau, 1980 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/01/F9/3701F9C3AF57AC2BE70F40FF55199EC6.xml b/data/37/01/F9/3701F9C3AF57AC2BE70F40FF55199EC6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..09f992e19e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/01/F9/3701F9C3AF57AC2BE70F40FF55199EC6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ + + + +Range extension of Brathinus satoi in China (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) + + + +Author + +Tang, Liang + + + +Author + +Li, Li-Zhen + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +344 + + +49 +54 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.344.5740 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.344.5740 +1313-2970-344-49 + + + + +Brathinus satoi Kishimoto & Shimada, 2003 +Figs 1-9 + + + +Material examined. + +China: Zhejiang: 1♀, Longwangshan, 1200m, 25.IV.2004, Jia-Yao Hu leg.; 1♂, Longwangshan, Qianmutian, 1300m, 24.V.2009, Feng & Yin leg.; 11♂♂ 5♀♀, same locality, 1250 +m- +1450m, +30°23'N +, +119°26'E +, 14.V.2013, Yu, Li, Zheng, Chen, Pan, Hu & Tang leg.; 1♂, same locality, 1050-1200m, near +30°24'28"N +, +119°26'25"E +, 15.V.2013, Chen & Pan leg. + + + +Distribution. +China (Sichuan, Zhejiang). + + +Comments. + +This species can be easily recognized by rugose punctation along supraorbital furrows (Fig. 3) and several additional characters: antennae reddish brown with antennomeres 9 and 10 pale and antennomere 11 blackish; each elytron (Fig. 4) with a large yellowish mark extending from the elytral center to a broad yellowish band along the lateral margin, anterad and posterad from the midpoint; profemur and metafemur with approximately half of the apical portion darker, mesofemur with apical portion slightly darker (Figs 1, 2); median lobe of aedeagus with a sclerotized +apical +portion which is delimited basally by a curved margin (Figs 5-7). In immature specimens, however, the elytral coloration is hardly discernible. + + + +Figures 1-4. +Brathinus satoi +. 1, 2 adult habitus, (1) dorsal, (2 ventral 3 head, dorsal 4 rightelytron, dorsal. Scale lines = 1 mm. + + + + +Figures 5-7. Aedeagus of +Brathinus satoi +. 5 ventral 6 lateral 7 dorsal. Scale line = 0.25 mm. + + + + +Biological notes. + +Most specimens were collected by sifting leaf litter along a stream in the forest, sometimes even along the bed of temporary brooks (Fig. 8). Two individuals were observed actively moving on the underside of a wet log lying close to a tiny stream (Fig. 9). In the past ten years, many collecting trips were made to Longwanshan +from +the middle of April to the beginning of October, covering all altitudes of the area in each trip (300-1500m), and the collections show that the activity period of the adults is during late April through May at the higher altitudes of the area, above 1000m. + + + +Figures 8, 9. 8 Habitat in Longwangshan 9 +Brathinus satoi +moving on wet log. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/02/2E/37022E59E20A2EB9A457E390C30D2C7B.xml b/data/37/02/2E/37022E59E20A2EB9A457E390C30D2C7B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e467f2deae3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/02/2E/37022E59E20A2EB9A457E390C30D2C7B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Platygastroidea + + + +Author + +Buhl, Peter N. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Notton, David G. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +7991 +7991 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7991 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7991 +1314-2828--7991 + + + + +Amblyaspis vitellinipes Kieffer, 1913 + + + +Distribution +Scotland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/02/65/370265B64D925CC6DA907BFECB62BE04.xml b/data/37/02/65/370265B64D925CC6DA907BFECB62BE04.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..37c60154ca0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/02/65/370265B64D925CC6DA907BFECB62BE04.xml @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ + + + +New data on the distribution, biology and ecology of the longhorn beetles from the area of South and East Kazakhstan (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) + + + +Author + +Karpinski, Lech + + + +Author + +Szczepanski, Wojciech T. + + + +Author + +lewa, Radoslaw + + + +Author + +Walczak, Marcin + + + +Author + +Hilszczanski, Jacek + + + +Author + +Kruszelnicki, Lech + + + +Author + +Los, Krzysztof + + + +Author + +Jaworski, Tomasz + + + +Author + +Marek Bidas, + + + +Author + +Tarwacki, Grzegorz + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2018 + +805 + + +59 +126 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.805.29660 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.805.29660 +1313-2970-805-59 +89E4F806F173432BAA15C18E53A8FAEF + + + + +Dorcadion morozovi Danilevsky, 1992 +Fig. 8B + + + +Material examined. + +Almaty Region: 10 km N of Kegen [ +Қeғen +] ( +43°09'N +, +79°12'E +), 1840 m a.s.l., 12 V 2017, 1♀, leg. JH, det. M. Danilevsky. + + + +Remarks. + +The species is endemic to southeastern Kazakhstan and Xinjiang province in China ( +Danilevsky 2018a +). In Kazakhstan, it occurs locally in the environs of Kegen and Narynkol ( +Danilevsky 1992 +, +Toropov and Milko 2013 +), where it inhabits valleys with steppe and meadow vegetation up to 2500 m a.s.l. The larvae feed on roots of various grass species (e.g. +Festuca spp +.). The imagines are active from mid-April to the end of May ( +Toropov and Milko 2013 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/02/85/37028566AE8788CCA6039D618621C4F9.xml b/data/37/02/85/37028566AE8788CCA6039D618621C4F9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7965b7d3e97 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/02/85/37028566AE8788CCA6039D618621C4F9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Checklist of Sphagnum-dwelling testate amoebae in Bulgaria + + + +Author + +Bankov, Nikola + + + +Author + +Todorov, Milcho + + + +Author + +Ganeva, Anna + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2018 + +6 + + +25295 +25295 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e25295 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e25295 +1314-2828--25295 + + + + +Hyalosphenia papilio (Leidy, 1874) Leidy, 1875 + + + + +Difflugia (Catharia) papilio +Leidy, 1874 + + + +Distribution + +Pirin Mt. (new data); Rhodopes Mt. ( +Golemansky 1968 +, +Golemansky et al. 2006 +); Rila Mt. ( +Golemansky and Todorov 1993 +, +Todorov and Golemansky 2000 +, +Todorov 2005 +, new data); Stara Planina Mt. (new data); Vitosha Mt. ( +Pateff 1924 +, +Golemansky 1965 +, +Golemansky and Todorov 1985 +, +Golemansky and Todorov 1990 +, +Todorov 1993 +, +Todorov and Golemansky 1995 +, new data). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC0FFA8E3BAFD40FA39744B.xml b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC0FFA8E3BAFD40FA39744B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e90ac961643 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC0FFA8E3BAFD40FA39744B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,255 @@ + + + +A revision of the Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) kheiliana Obenberger, 1931 species-group (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) + + + +Author + +Ỹ, Svatopluk Bíl + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2008 + +1816 + + +44 +56 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.182919 +e05d45ac-6668-4978-b563-8e8f90ff5d0e +1175-5326 +182919 + + + + + + +Key to species of the + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +kheiliana + +species-group + + + + + + + + +1 Slender, bronze, frons of male green, frons of female bronze, posterior pronotal angles red-bronze; vertex as wide as width of eye; pronotum as wide as elytra, 1.6–1.7 times as wide as long, lateral pronotal margins nearly straight; elytra twice as long as wide; male metatibiae (Fig. 12); aedeagus ( +Fig. 17 +); 5.0– +7.6 mm +; +Benin +, +Burkina Faso +, +Chad +, +Ghana +, +Ivory Coast +, +Kenya + +..................................................................... ....................................................................................... +A. teloukatiae + +Descarpentries & Bruneau de Miré + + + +- Short, robust, often wedge-shaped, black, dark bronze or bronze; frons of both sexes concolorous; vertex 0.6–0.8 times as wide as width of eye; pronotum distinctly wider than elytra, 1.8–2.2 times as wide as long, lateral pronotal margins widely rounded; elytra short, uneven, 1.7–1.8 times as long as wide.......2 + + + + + +2 Frons only slightly convex with relatively short white pubescence; pronotum 1.8–1.9 times as wide as long, elytra only slightly wedge-shaped, apical 1/3 of elytral margins with fine serration; male metatibiae (Fig. 7); aedeagus without dorsal fields of bristles ( +Fig. 13 +); +5.5–6.2 mm +; +Ethiopia +, +Somalia + +A. dauensis +Obenberger + + + + + +- Frons moderately or strongly convex with rather long, white or cream-white pubescence; pronotum 1.9– 2.2 times as wide as long; elytra usually strongly wedge-shaped (exceptionally subparallel e.g. + +A. zambiana + +sp. nov. +), apical 1/3 of elytral margins with rough serration; aedeagus always with dorsal fields of bristles (Figs. 4, 14–18)..............................................................................................................................3 + + + + + + +3 Frons strongly convex (Fig. 5); pronotum 2.2 times as wide as long with very fine, ocellate sculpture; elytra only slightly wedge-shaped, with very fine, simple punctation; male unknown; +7.6 mm +; +Zimbabwe + +.............................................................................................................................. +A. bambisina + +Obenberger + + + + +- Frons moderately convex (Fig. 1); pronotum 1.9–2.1 times as wide as long with fine but quite distinct, ocellate sculpture; elytra wedge-shaped (except for + +A. zambiana +, + + +sp. nov. + +) with distinct, well-developed punctation .................................................................................................................................................. 4 + + + + + + +4 Bright bronze, rarely dark bronze, lustrous; frontal pubescence cream-white or yellow, pronotum 1.9–2.0 times as wide as long; male mesotibiae slender, slightly curved, male metatibiae (Fig. 8); aedeagus ( +Fig. 14 +); 5.3–7.0 mm; +Ethiopia +, +Kenya +, +Tanzania + +................................................................. +A. occulta +, + + +sp. nov. + + + + +- Black or dark bronze, less lustrous; frontal pubescence white, pronotum 2.0–2.1 times as wide as long; aedeagus of a different form (Figs. 4, 15–16, 18)........................................................................................5 + + + + + +5 Antescutellar portion of pronotum with transverse sculpture consisting of transversely enlarged cells with large central grains; elytra more acuminate apically (Fig. 1); male mesotibiae thick, strongly curved, male metatibiae (Fig. 6); aedeagus (Fig. 4); +6.7–9.2 mm +; +Ethiopia +, +Somalia +, +Tanzania + +A. kheiliana +Obenberger + + + + + +- Antescutellar portion of pronotum with fine, rounded cells with small central grains; elytra less acuminate apically; male mesotibiae slender, nearly straight, male metatibiae (Figs. 9–11); aedeagus of a different + + +form ( +Figs. 15–16, 18 +)................................................................................................................................6 + + +6 Elytra nearly subparallel, frons more convex; lateral pronotal margins regularly rounded; lateroposterior pronotal depressions nearly indistinct; male metatibiae (Fig. 10); aedeagus short, spindle-shaped ( +Fig. 18 +); +6.8–7.1 mm +; +Zambia +......................................................................................... + +A. zambiana +, + + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +- Elytra wedge-shaped, frons moderately convex; lateral pronotal margins not regularly rounded, sometimes nearly angulate; lateroposterior pronotal depressions wide, shallow; male metatibiae (Figs. 9, 11); aedeagus not spindle-shaped ( +Figs. 15–16 +).................................................................................................7 + + + + + +7 Black, lustrous with very slight metallic tinge; elytra distinctly uneven with wide, rather deep depressions; male metatibiae (Fig. 9); aedeagus ( +Fig. 15 +); +7.2–7.7 mm +; +Tanzania + +............... +A. impressipennis +, + + +sp. nov. + + + + + +- Black-bronze, rather mat, pronotum with slight red lustre; elytra only slightly uneven, with very shallow depressions; male metatibiae (Fig. 11); aedeagus ( +Fig. 16 +); 7.0– +7.5 mm +; +Yemen +....... + +A. nasheri +, + + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC1FFA8E3BAFD40FC9C706E.xml b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC1FFA8E3BAFD40FC9C706E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..face88c31c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC1FFA8E3BAFD40FC9C706E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ + + + +A revision of the Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) kheiliana Obenberger, 1931 species-group (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) + + + +Author + +Ỹ, Svatopluk Bíl + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2008 + +1816 + + +44 +56 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.182919 +e05d45ac-6668-4978-b563-8e8f90ff5d0e +1175-5326 +182919 + + + + + + + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +bambisina +Obenberger, 1928 + + + + +(Fig. 5) + + + + + +Anthaxia bambisina + +Obenberger, 1928 +: 235 + + +; 1930: 538 + + + + + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +bambisina +: + +Bílý, 1997 +: 15 + + +, 50, 156. + + + + + + +Type +locality: + +Zimbabwe +[“S +Rhodesia +”], Bambisi. + + + +Type +specimen examined. + +Syntype +(Ψ, +NMPC +) labelled: “S +Rhodesia +, Bambisi [h] // + +TYPUS + +[p] [red label] // Mus. Nat. Pragae [p], 22784 [h] [orange label] // + +Anthaxia bambisina + +m. +Type +[h], Det. Dr. Obenberger [p]”. + +This species was most probably described from a single female; no other specimen has been found in the collections and the male remains unknown. + + + +Diagnosis. +Medium-sized, convex, robust, dark bronze; dorsal surface asetose, frons with rather long, dense, white pubescence, ventral surface with indistinct, short, sparse, white pubescence. Head large, frons strongly convex (Fig. 5), eyes large, reniform, projecting beyond outline of head; antennae short, hardly reaching midlength of lateral pronotal margins. Pronotum distinctly wider than elytra, 2.2 times as wide as long bearing very fine ocellate sculpture; lateroposterior depressions small, shallow, rounded; lateral margins simply rounded, anterior margin strongly bisinuate; scutellum large, roundely pentagonal, slightly wider than long. Elytra slightly uneven, 1.7 times as long as wide, subparallel, strongly acumined at posterior 1/3. Ventral surface mat, densely punctato-ocellate, anal ventrite of female finely emarginate apically; male unknown. Length: +7.6 mm +; width: +2.9 mm +. + + +Bionomy. +Unknown. + + + + +Distribution. +Zimbabwe +. + + + + +Comments. +This species is characteristic by the strongly convex frons (Fig. 5), eyes projecting beyond outline of the head and by the stout, wedge-shaped body. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC1FFAFE3BAF91DFB1275F0.xml b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC1FFAFE3BAF91DFB1275F0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a36790c9a8b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC1FFAFE3BAF91DFB1275F0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ + + + +A revision of the Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) kheiliana Obenberger, 1931 species-group (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) + + + +Author + +Ỹ, Svatopluk Bíl + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2008 + +1816 + + +44 +56 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.182919 +e05d45ac-6668-4978-b563-8e8f90ff5d0e +1175-5326 +182919 + + + + + + + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +dauensis +Obenberger, 1924 + + + + +(Figs. 7, 13) + + + + + +Anthaxia dauensis + +Obenberger, 1924 +: 106 + + +. + + + + + +Anthaxia daouensis +: + +Obenberger, 1928 +: 231 + + +(unjustified emmendation); 1930: 540. + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +dauensis +: + +Bílý, 1997 +: 19 + + +, 63, 157. + + + + + + +Type +locality: + +Ethiopia +[“Abessynia”], Dire Daoua [Diré Dawa, Ahmar Mts.]. + + + +Type +specimen examined. + +Syntype +(Ψ, +NMPC +) labelled: “Dire Daoua, Abessyn. [h] // + +TYPUS + +[p] [red label] // + +A. daouensis + +[sic!] +m. +Type +[h], Det. Dr. Obenberger [p]”. + + +Additional specimens examined. + +SOMALIA + +: Berbera (1 Ψ, +NMPC +); Benadir, Mogadiscio +70 km +, ex larva + +Acacia + +sp., +ix.1987 +, R. Mourglia leg. (2 ɗɗ, +NMPC +). + + + + +Diagnosis. +Small to medium-sized, robust, moderately convex, dark bronze, sometimes with green lustre; dorsal surface asetose, frons with short, rather dense, white pubescence, ventral surface with very short, sparse, white pubescence, metepisterna with dense, white pubescence. Head large, frons convex, eyes large, not projecting beyond outline of head; antennae short, hardly reaching midlength of lateral pronotal margins. Pronotum convex, 1.8–1.9 times as wide as long, somewhat wider than elytra with small, shallow lateroposterior depressions; lateral margins nearly regularly rounded, anterior margin strongly bisinuate; scutellum pentagonal, as wide as long. Elytra short, 1.7–1.8 times as long as wide, uneven with wide, transverse depression at anterior 1/3 and deep, lateral, longitudinal depression at posterior 1/2; elytra subparallel at anterior 2/3, strongly acumined at posterior 1/3, somewhat caudiform apically with very fine lateral serration. Ventral surface mat, punctato-ocellate, anal ventrite apically narrowly truncate (ɗ) or finely emarginate (Ψ); inner margin of male metatibiae with postmedial, obtuse tooth (Fig. 7); aedeagus without dorsal field of bristles ( +Fig. 13 +). Length: +5.5–6.2 mm +; width: +2.2–2.4 mm +. + + +Bionomy. +Two specimens from +Somalia +were reared from + +Acacia + +sp. ( +Mimosaceae +). + + + + +Distribution. +Ethiopia +, +Somalia +. + + + + +Comments. +This species was most probably described from a single female and is the only species of the group without the dorsal field of bristles on the parameres. Nevertheless, the shape of the male genitalia ( +Fig. 13 +), the form of male metatibiae (Fig. 7), the pronotal and elytral sculpture as well as the form of anal ventrite and general body-shape enable the attribution of this species to + +A. kheiliana + +species-group. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC4FFACE3BAFD90FD4871B6.xml b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC4FFACE3BAFD90FD4871B6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..387114fe59a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC4FFACE3BAFD90FD4871B6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,288 @@ + + + +A revision of the Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) kheiliana Obenberger, 1931 species-group (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) + + + +Author + +Ỹ, Svatopluk Bíl + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2008 + +1816 + + +44 +56 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.182919 +e05d45ac-6668-4978-b563-8e8f90ff5d0e +1175-5326 +182919 + + + + + + + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +nasheri + +, +sp. nov. + + + +(Figs. 11, 16) + + + + +Type +specimens. + +Holotype +(ɗ, +NMPC +): “S +Yemen +, Wadi Daw´an, NW Al Mukalla, +15°09'N +48°26'E +, +946 m +, +20.x.2005 +, M. Rejzek leg.”; allotype (Ψ, +NMPC +): the same data; +paratypes +(3 ɗɗ, 6 ΨΨ, +NMPC +, +MNAC +): the same data. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Medium-sized, convex, slightly wedge-shaped, bronze, ventral surface bright bronze (ɗ) or bronze (Ψ), frons and posterior pronotal angles with red tinge; dorsal surface asetose, frons with dense, white pubescence, ventral surface with nearly indistinct, short, white pubescence, metepimers with white tomentum. + + + + + +Description of the +holotype +. + +Head large, as wide as anterior pronotal margin, eyes large, reniform, very slightly projecting beyond outline of head; frontoclypeus feebly emarginate anteriorly, frons convex, vertex 0.8 times as wide as width of eye; antennae short, hardly reaching midlength of lateral pronotal margins, scape claviform, 3 times as long as wide, pedicel suboval, 1.5 times as long as wide; antennomere 3 roundly triangular, 1.5 times as long as wide, antennomeres 4–10 trapezoidal, 1.3–1.5 times as wide as long, terminal antennomere rhomboid; sculpture of head consisting of fine rounded cells with distinct central grains. + +Pronotum moderately convex, distinctly wider than elytra, slightly transversely depressed at posterior 1/3, 1.9 times as wide as long with wide, shallow lateroposterior depressions; lateral margins regularly rounded, anterior margin slightly bisinuate, posterior margin nearly straight; pronotal sculpture very fine, consisting of small, polygonal cells with central grains; anterior portion of pronotum without central grains, disc of pronotum with somewhat transversely enlarged cells; scutellum relatively small, subcordiform, slightly wider than long. +Elytra convex, wedge-shaped, slightly uneven, 1.7 times as long as wide; humeral swellings small, transverse, basal depression wide, nearly reaching scutellum, interrupted by small elevation near humeri; each elytron with several very small, irregular depressions, posterior 1/3 of elytral margin finely serrate. +Ventral surface mat, densely punctate, proepisterns finely ocellate; anal ventrite narrowly truncate apically, finely serrate laterally. Legs robust, inner margins of metatibiae slightly emarginate, finely serrate at posterior 1/3 (Fig. 11). + +Aedeagus relatively slender, parameres with poorly developed dorsal fields of bristles ( +Fig. 16 +). + +Sexual dimorphism. The female differs from the male by the darker ventral surface, a somewhat wider pronotum (twice as wide as long), by the unmodified metatibiae and finely emarginate apical margin of the anal abdominal ventrite. + +Measurements. +Length: +6.9–7.8 mm +( +holotype +7.0 mm); width: +2.7–3.1 mm +( +holotype +2.7 mm +). + + +Variability. +No variability was observed except for the size. + + +Bionomy. +All +type +specimens were reared from + +Acacia + +sp. ( +Mimosaceae +). + + + + +Etymology. + +Anthaxia nasheri + +is dedicated to Prof. Karim Nasher (University of Saná, +Yemen +) for his great help during the trips of Czech zoologists to +Yemen +. + + +Differential diagnosis. + +Anthaxia nasheri + +somewhat resembles smaller specimens of + +A. kheiliana + +from which it differs (except for its distribution) by less uneven and wedge-shaped elytra, more bronze colouration, more dense frontal pubescence, form of male metatibiae (Figs. 6 vs. 11) and strongly by male genitalia (Figs. 4 vs. 16). + + + + +Distribution: +Yemen +. + + +FIGURES 1–12. +1. + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +kheiliana +Obenberger, 1931 + +, +syntype +, +7.8 mm +; 2. the same, anal ventrite of ɗ, +syntype +; 3. the same, anal ventrite of Ψ ( +Ethiopia +, Sidano); 4. the same, aedeagus, +syntype +; 5. + +A. +( +H. +) +bambisina +Obenberge, 1928 + +, outline of head, +syntype +; 6–12. Male metatibiae. 6. + +A. +( +H. +) +kheiliana + +, +syntype +; 7. + +A. +( +H. +) +dauensis +Obenberger, 1924 + +, +syntype +; 8. + +A. +( +H. +) +occulta + + +sp. nov. +, + +holotype +; 9. + +A. +( +H. +) +impressipennis + + +sp. nov. +, + +holotype +; 10. + +A. +( +H. +) +zambiana + + +sp. nov. +, + +holotype +; 11. + +A. +( +H. +) +nasheri + + +sp. nov. +, + +holotype +; 12. + +A. +( +H. +) +teloukatiae +Descarpentries & Bruneau + +de +Miré, 1963 +, +holotype +; a—dorsal view, b— lateral view. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC6FFAEE3BAFB88FE727588.xml b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC6FFAEE3BAFB88FE727588.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e2dea654cf6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC6FFAEE3BAFB88FE727588.xml @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ + + + +A revision of the Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) kheiliana Obenberger, 1931 species-group (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) + + + +Author + +Ỹ, Svatopluk Bíl + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2008 + +1816 + + +44 +56 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.182919 +e05d45ac-6668-4978-b563-8e8f90ff5d0e +1175-5326 +182919 + + + + + + + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +impressipennis + +, +sp. nov. + + + +(Figs. 9, 15) + + + + +Type +specimens. + +Holotype +(ɗ, +NMPC +): “ +Tanzania +, Pawaga, +10.xii.1991 +, P. A. Dutto legit.”; +paratype +(ɗ, +DGCI +): the same data. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Large, robust, wedge-shaped, black, lustrous with very slight metallic lustre, ventral surface red-bronze; dorsal surface asetose, frons with long, dense, white pubescence, ventral surface with very short, sparse, white pubescence, metepisterna with relatively dense, white pubescence. + + + + + +Description of the +holotype +. + +Head large, as wide as anterior pronotal margin; eyes large, reniform, slightly projecting beyond outline of head; frontoclypeus narrow, slightly, triangularly emarginate anteriorly, frons regularly convex; vertex 0.7 times as wide as width of eye; antennae very short, barely reaching anterior 1/3 of lateral pronotal margins; scape slender, slightly claviform, 3.5 times as long as wide; pedicel nearly cylindrical, slightly longer than wide; antennomere 3 triangular, 1.3 times as long as wide; antennomeres 4–10 trapezoidal, 1.5–1.8 times as wide as long; terminal antennomere rhomboid; sculpture of head rugose, consisting of oval and polygonal cells with large central grains. + +Pronotum 2.0 times as wide as long; feebly, transversely depressed with wide, relatively deep lateroposterior depressions; lateral margins widely, almost angularly rounded, maximum pronotal width slightly anteriad of middlength; anterior margin bisinuate, posterior margin nearly straight; pronotal sculpture fine, consisting of small, polygonal cells with small central grains, central part of pronotum with somewhat transversely prolonged cells; scutellum large, roundly triangular, slightly wider than long. +Elytra wedge-shaped, 1.6 times as long as wide, conspicuously uneven; each elytron with wide, oblique, deep depression at anterior 1/3, large, suboval depression at posterior 1/3 and with several small depressions between them and on humeral portion of elytra; transverse, basal depression well-developed reaching scutellum, interrupted by small elevation near humeri; humeral swellings small, epipleura nearly reaching elytral apex; apical 1/3 of elytral margins sharply serrate; elytral sculpture very fine, consisting of tiny, simple punctures, postscutellar portion with relatively dense punctation. +Ventral surface densely punctured, proepisterns finely ocellate; anal ventrite finely serrate laterally, narrowly truncate apically. Legs relatively short, stout, inner margins of metatibiae slightly emarginate, very finely serrate at apical 1/3 (Fig. 9). + +Aedeagus slender, parameres with well-developed dorsal fields of short bristles ( +Fig. 15 +). + +Sexual dimorphism. Female unknown. + +Measurements. +Length: +7.2 mm +( +holotype +), +7.7 mm +( +paratype +); width: +2.8 mm +( +holotype +), +2.9 mm +( +paratype +). + + +Variability. +The +paratype +possesses a slightly wider pronotum (2.1 times as wide as long) and somewhat longer elytra (1.7 times as long as wide). + + +Bionomy. +unknown. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet is derived from the Latin adjective “impressio” (depressed) and substantive “pennae”(wings) describing unusually uneven elytra. + + +Differential diagnosis. + +Anthaxia impressipennis + +resembles black specimens of + +A. kheiliana + +from which it differs by conspicuously uneven elytra, narrower vertex and by the different form of male metatibiae (Figs. 6 vs. 9) and genitalia (Figs. 4 vs. 15). + + + + +Distribution: +Tanzania +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC7FFADE3BAFC00FEDD77F8.xml b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC7FFADE3BAFC00FEDD77F8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0802db9c4d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC7FFADE3BAFC00FEDD77F8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@ + + + +A revision of the Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) kheiliana Obenberger, 1931 species-group (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) + + + +Author + +Ỹ, Svatopluk Bíl + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2008 + +1816 + + +44 +56 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.182919 +e05d45ac-6668-4978-b563-8e8f90ff5d0e +1175-5326 +182919 + + + + + + + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +kheiliana +Obenberger, 1931 + + + + +(Figs. 1–4, 6) + + + + + +Anthaxia kheiliana + +Obenberger, 1931 +: 102 + + +; + +Obenberger, 1940 +: 11 + +; + +Descarpentries, 1959 +: 87 + +; + +Bílý, 1997 +: 26 + +, 84, 160. + + + + + + +Type +locality: + +western +Kenya +, Kavirondo Bay [Victoria Lake, Winam]. + + + +Type +specimen examined. + +Syntype +(ɗ, +NMPC +) labelled: “Kavirondo, Afr. or. [h] // + +TYPUS + +[p] [red label] // Mus. Nat. Pragae [p] 22766 [h] [orange label] // + +Anthaxia kheiliana + +m. +Type +[h] Dr. J. Obenberger [p]”. + + +Additional specimens examined. + +ETHIOPIA + +: Rift Valley, Awash NP, +08°52'N +45°05'E +, +1200 m +, +3.-6- iv.1998 +, Malaise trap, O. & M. Niehuis leg. (1 Ψ, +MNAC +). + +SOMALIA + +: Borana, +v.1937 +, E. Zavattari leg. (1 Ψ, +NMPC +). + +TANZANIA + +: Rukwa Lake, +3700 ft +, +iv.1938 +, D. G. MacInnes leg. (2 ɗɗ, 1 Ψ, +NMPC +); Ukerewe [Lake Victoria] ( +1 female +, +NMPC +). + + + + +Diagnosis. +Large, robust, wedge-shaped, dark bronze (Fig. 1), ventral surface red-bronze; dorsal surface asetose, frons with long, dense, white pubescence, ventral surface with short, sparse, white pubescence, mesosternum, metepimers, laterosternites, sometimes also anal ventrite with white tomentum. Head large, wider than anterior pronotal margin, eyes large, projecting beyond outline of head; frons convex, antennae reaching midlength of lateral pronotal margins. Pronotum moderately convex, twice as wide as long, distinctly wider than elytra with wide, shallow lateroposterior depressions; lateral margins regularly rounded to slightly angulate at posterior 1/3, anterior margin strongly bisinuate; scutellum large, pentagonal, 1.3 times as wide as long. Elytra wedge-shaped (Fig. 1), 1.7–1.8 times as long as wide, uneven, with wide, transverse depression at anterior 1/3 and deep, lateral, longitudinal depression at posterior 1/2; posterior 1/3 of elytral margins sharply serrate. Ventral surface mat, finely punctato-ocellate, anal ventrite narrowly truncate (ɗ Fig. 2) or finely emarginate (Ψ Fig. 3); inner margin of male metatibiae sharply serrate at apical 1/2 (Fig. 6); aedeagus with apically strongly narrowed parameres (Fig. 4). Length: +6.7–9.2 mm +; width: +2.7–3.7 mm +. + + +Bionomy. +Unknown. + + + + +Distribution. +Ethiopia +, +Somalia +, +Tanzania +. + + + + +Comments. +The largest and most robust species of the group and yet probably described only for the single male. +Obenberger (1940) +recorded a further two specimens (unknown sex) from +Somalia +: Arero, +12.iv.1937 +and Moyale, +14.v.1937 +(MCSN). Further specimens from +Tanzania +were published by +Descarpentries (1959) +: Simba, 1955 (5 ex. of unknown sex, MNHN). + + +Obenberger (1932) +used the epithet + +A. kheiliana +Obenberger, 1932 + +for a second taxon from South +America +( +Brazil +). This name is a primary homonym as well as a junior subjective synonym of + +Agrilaxia occidentalis +Kerremans, 1900 + +( +Cobos, 1971 +; +Bílý, 1997 +) and has nothing to do with the African species + +A. kheiliana +Obenberger, 1931 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC8FFA0E3BAFDA8FDF27708.xml b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC8FFA0E3BAFDA8FDF27708.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d4459392b9f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC8FFA0E3BAFDA8FDF27708.xml @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@ + + + +A revision of the Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) kheiliana Obenberger, 1931 species-group (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) + + + +Author + +Ỹ, Svatopluk Bíl + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2008 + +1816 + + +44 +56 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.182919 +e05d45ac-6668-4978-b563-8e8f90ff5d0e +1175-5326 +182919 + + + + + + + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +teloukatiae +Descarpentries & Bruneau + +de +Miré, 1963 + + + +(Figs. 12, 17) + + + + + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +teloukatiae +Descarpentries & Bruneau + +de + +Miré, 1963 +: 182 + +–184; + +Bílý, 1997 +: 37 + +, 121, 152. + + + + + + +Type +locality: + +Chad +, Bassin de Gorrom, +2000 m +. + + + +Type +specimens examined. + +Holotype +and allotype (ɗ, Ψ, +MNHN +) both labelled: “Bassin de Gorrom, écl. +8.III.62 +ex + +Ficus teloukat + +[h] // Tibesti, de Miré [p]”. + + + +Additional specimens examined. +BENIN + +: Boko, +21.iv.2006 +, from flowers of +Liliaceae, J. F. Vaysieres +leg. (2 ɗɗ, +JFVC +; 2 ɗɗ, +NMPC +); N of Paracou, +09°23'N +02°42'E +, +1.v.2006 +, G. Curletti leg. (1 ɗ, +NMPC +). + +BURKINA FASO + +: Bobo Dioulasso, +viii.1954 +(1 ɗ, +NMPC +); Kadomba, S of Koudougou, +5.x.1979 +, Pauly leg. (1 Ψ, +NMPC +); Ouagadougou, +vii.–viii.1985 +, ex larva: +Kaja +[ + +Khaya + +] + +senegalensis +, R. Mourglia + +leg. (2 ɗɗ, +NMPC +; 1 ɗ, 1 Ψ, +DGCI +). + +GHANA + +: Eastern reg., Kpong, +06°10'N +00°03'W +, +23 m +, +10.i.1968 +, S. Endrodi- Younga leg. (1 ɗ, +NMPC +); Takoradi, +17.12.1967 +, C. Besnard leg. (3 ɗɗ, +NMPC +). + +IVORY COAST + +: Danané, +v.1953 +(1 Ψ, +NMPC +). + +KENYA + +: +Mombasa +, Diani, +viii.1985 +, R. Mourglia leg. (1 Ψ, +NMPC +). + + + + +Diagnosis. +Small, slender, moderately convex, bronze (Fig. +10 in +Descarpentries & Bruneau de +Miré, 1963 +), lateral pronotal margins, sometimes entire pronotum and laterosternites with red lustre, frons of male golden green; dorsal surface asetose, frons with short, rather dense, white pubescence, ventral surface blackbronze with short, very sparse, white pubescence. Head large, somewhat wider than anterior pronotal margin, eyes large, not projecting beyond outline of head; antennae very short reaching anterior 1/3 of lateral pronotal margin. Pronotum as wide as elytra, moderately convex, 1.6–1.7 times as wide as long with wide and shallow lateroposterior depressions; lateral margins very slightly angulate at midlength, anterior margin strongly bisinuate; scutellum relatively large, subcordiform, as long as wide. Elytra wedge-shaped, twice as long as wide, regularly convex; apical quarter of elytral margins finely serrate. Ventral surface mat, finely, densely ocellate, anal ventrite truncate (male) or finely emarginate (female); inner margin of male metatibiae finely serrate at apical 1/3 (Fig. 12); aedeagus rather short, parameres with ventral tooth ( +Fig. 17 +). Length: 5.0–7.6; width: 2.0– +2.7 mm +. + + +Bionomy. +The +type +specimens were reared from + +Ficus teloukat +(Moraceae) + +; one female in +Burkina Faso +from + +Khaya senegalensis +(Meliaceae) + +. + + + + +Distribution: +Benin +, +Burkina Faso +, +Chad +, +Ghana +, +Ivory Coast +, +Kenya +. + + + + +Comments. +One female from +Burkina Faso +(Kadomba) differs from the rest of the examined specimens by its larger size ( +7.6 mm +) and the very dark, bronze colouration of the whole body. + +Anthaxia teloukatiae + +is a rather atypical member of the + +A. kheiliana + +species-group due to its slender body, long and regularly convex elytra and the sexual dichromatism of frons. Conversely, a whole set of characters such as the convex frons, very short antennae, pronotal sculpture, form of anal ventrite and significantly the form of the male genitalia ( +Fig. 17 +) indicate the placement of this species to the + +A. kheiliana + +species-group. + +Anthaxia teloukatiae + +is probably the western-most and most derived representative of the group distributed in the western and southern Sahel and reaching eastward to +Kenya +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC9FFA0E3BAFE80FE7C71BE.xml b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC9FFA0E3BAFE80FE7C71BE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0e1d588f385 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFC9FFA0E3BAFE80FE7C71BE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ + + + +A revision of the Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) kheiliana Obenberger, 1931 species-group (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) + + + +Author + +Ỹ, Svatopluk Bíl + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2008 + +1816 + + +44 +56 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.182919 +e05d45ac-6668-4978-b563-8e8f90ff5d0e +1175-5326 +182919 + + + + + + + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +zambiana + +, +sp. nov. + + + +(Figs. 10, 18) + + + + +Type +specimens. + +Holotype +(ɗ, +NMPC +): “ +Zambia +, Kafue, +1.vii.1990 +, leg. F. Ferrero”; allotype (Ψ, +DGCI +): same data as +holotype +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Medium-sized to large, subparallel, robust, bronze, basal portion of pronotum with red lustre, ventral surface red-bronze; dorsal surface asetose, frons with long, dense, white pubescence, ventral surface with short, sparse, white pubecsence, metepimers with traces of white tomentum. + + + + + +Description of the +holotype +. + +Head large, slightly wider than anterior pronotal margin, eyes large, reniform, slightly projecting beyond outline of head; frontoclypeus finely emarginate anteriorly, frons rather strongly convex, vertex 0.8 times as wide as width of eye; antennae short, reaching anterior 1/3 of lateral pronotal margins, scape slightly claviform, 4 times as long as wide, pedicel obconical, 1.3 times as long as wide; antennomere 3 subtriangular, 1.5 times as long as wide, antennomeres 4–5 triangular, as wide as long, antennomeres 6–10 trapezoidal, 1.2–1.6 times as wide as long, terminal antennomere rhomboid; sculpture of head consisting of small, polygonal cells with flat central grains. + +Pronotum slightly convex, distinctly wider than elytra, twice as wide as long with small, shallow lateroposterior depressions, indistinctly, transversely depressed at posterior 1/3; lateral margins widely, regularly rounded, anterior margin bisinuate, posterior margin almost straight with small, prescutellar emargination; sculpture very fine, consisting of small, polygonal cells with tiny central grains, medial portion with somewhat transversely enlarged cells; scutellum large, nearly pentagonal, slightly wider than long. +Elytra lustrous, 1.7 times as long as wide, slightly uneven, subparallel at anterior 3/4 with somewhat caudiform apex; humeral swellings small, basal, transverse depression shallow, not reaching scutellum, interrupted by small elevation near humeri; each elytron with 2–3 shallow, nearly transverse depressions, posterior 1/4 of lateral margins finely, sharply serrate; sculpture very fine, consisting of small, simple punctures, postscutellar portion with somewhat denser punctation. +Ventral surface mat, finely, densely punctured, proepisterns finely ocellate; anal ventrite narrowly truncate apically, finely serrate laterally. Legs slender, inner margin of metatibiae only feebly emarginate at posterior 1/ 3, without inner serration (Fig. 10). + +Aedeagus short, spindle-shaped, parameres with well-developed dorsal fields of bristles ( +Fig. 18 +). + +Sexual dimorphism. Female differs from male by somewhat wider pronotum (2.1 times as wide as long), simple metatibiae and apically finely emarginate anal ventrite. + +Measurements. +Length: +6.8 mm +( +holotype +) and +7.1 mm +(allotype); width: +2.7 mm +( +holotype +) and 3.0 mm (allotype). + + +Variability. +No variability between the +holotype +and allotype was observed except for sexual dimorphism. + +Bionomy. Unknown. + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet is derived from the country of the origin ( +Zambia +). + + +Differential diagnosis. + +Anthaxia zambiana + +resembles dark and stout specimens of + +A. occulta + +from which it differs by parallel, slightly caudiform elytra, the wider pronotum, the form of the male metatibiae (Figs. 8 vs. 10) and genitalia which are simply spindle-shaped ( +Figs. 14 +vs. 18). + + + + +Distribution: +Zambia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFCAFFA1E3BAFF48FD037410.xml b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFCAFFA1E3BAFF48FD037410.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4f1fb787490 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/02/A7/3702A70DFFCAFFA1E3BAFF48FD037410.xml @@ -0,0 +1,349 @@ + + + +A revision of the Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) kheiliana Obenberger, 1931 species-group (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) + + + +Author + +Ỹ, Svatopluk Bíl + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2008 + +1816 + + +44 +56 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.182919 +e05d45ac-6668-4978-b563-8e8f90ff5d0e +1175-5326 +182919 + + + + + + + +Anthaxia +( +Haplanthaxia +) +occulta + +, +sp. nov. + + + +(Figs. 8, 14) + + + + +Type +specimens. + +Holotype +(ɗ, +NMPC +): “ +Kenya +/Amboseli Park, Kilimanjaro Safari Lodge, +1200 m +, +16.vii.1985 +, R. Mourglia leg.”; allotype (Ψ, +NMPC +): “ +Kenya +/ Amboseli Park, Kilimanjaro Safari Lodge, e. l. + +Acacia + +sp., +ix.1985 +, R. Mourglia leg.”; +paratypes +(30 ɗɗ, 17 ΨΨ): same data as allotype (4 ɗɗ, 3 ΨΨ, +NMPC +; 1 ɗ, 1 Ψ, +DGCI +; 1 ɗ, 1 Ψ, +MNAC +); “ +Kenya +or., Voi, +24.–28.i.1996 +, lgt. Ing. M. Sníżek” (1 Ψ, +MKCN +); “ +Kenya +, Voi (Tsavo), +22.xi.–2.xii.1996 +, M. Sníżek leg.” (2 ɗɗ, +NMPC +); “ +Kenya +SE, Tsavo, Voi env., +15.iv.2004 +, M. Sníżek leg. (1 ɗ, +MOCB +); ”“ +Kenya +, Lower Tana River: Gamba, +25.–27.x.2005 +, Sakalian & Curletti leg.” (4 ɗɗ, +VSCS +); “ +Kenya +, Nyiri Desert, +3.i.1956 +, J. C. M. Gardner leg.” (3 ΨΨ, +NMPC +); “ +Kenya +süd, Sokoke-Gede-Forest, Umg. Gede, +50 m +, +27.x.–3.xi.2007 +, leg. A. Puchner” (3 ɗɗ, 3 ΨΨ, +WBCV +); “ +Kenya +C.S. [central-south], Kangondo Kithioko, +6.iv.2004 +, M. Sníżek leg.” (1 ɗ, +MOCB +); “ +Kenya +, Eastern Katutu-Kihtioko, +27.xi.1999 +, M. Sníżek leg.” (2 ɗɗ, +MOCB +; 1 ɗ, +MKCN +); “ +Tanzania +, Segera-Chalinze, +30.iii.1997 +, Werner & Lízler leg.” (1 ɗ, +NMPC +); “ +Tanzania +bor. or., Mombo, +9.–11.i.1995 +, Smrż lgt.” (1 ɗ, +NMPC +; 1 ɗ, 1 Ψ, +MKCN +); “ +Tanzania +bor., Mombo, +9.ii.1996 +, ing. M. Sníżek lgt.” (5 ɗɗ, 1 Ψ, +MKCN +; 1 ɗ, +NMPC +); “ +Tanzania +NE, Handeni, Makinda env., +14.iii.2002 +, lgt. M. Sníżek” (1 Ψ, +MOCB +); “ +Ethiopia +S., Gamo Gofa, pr. +1200 m +, +45 km +Sa Arba Minch, +15.iv.2007 +, J. Halada leg.” (1 Ψ, +MOCB +); “ +Ethiopia +, Shakisso?Negele, Sidano Prov., +14.v.2003 +, Werner leg.” (1 Ψ, +NMPC +). + + + + +Diagnosis. +Medium-sized, robust, wedge-shaped, bronze, lustrous, posterior pronotal angles sometimes with red tinge, ventral surface red-bronze; frons of male red-bronze, that of female bronze; dorsal surface asetose, frons with white or cream-white, dense pubescence; ventral surface with very sparse, microscopic, white pubescence, metepisterna and laterosternites with short, white pubescence, sometimes also with sparse, white tomentum. + + + + + +Description of the +holotype +. + +Head large, as wide as anterior pronotal margin, eyes large, reniform, slightly projecting beyond outline of head; frontoclypeus widely emarginate anteriorly, frons moderately convex; vertex as wide as width of eye; antennae short, reaching anterior 1/3 of lateral pronotal margins; scape four times as long as wide, claviform, slightly curved, pedicel suboval, 1.3 times as long as wide; antennomere 3 slightly triangular, 1.5 times as long as wide, antennomeres 4–10 trapezoidal, 1.3–1.5 times as wide as long, terminal antennomere ovoid; sculpture of head consisting of very dense, small, polygonal cells with central grains. + +Pronotum moderately convex, 1.9 times as wide as long with relatively wide, shallow lateroposterior depressions and 2 small, rounded, punctiform depressions on disc; lateral pronotal margins nearly regularly rounded, maximum width posteriad of midlength; anterior margin strongly, posterior margin slightly bisinuate; sculpture nearly homogeneous consisting of small, polygonal cells with well-developed central grains; scutellum relatively large, subcordiform, as wide as long. +Elytra moderately convex, wedge-shaped, 1.7 times as long as wide, uneven; humeral swellings small, basal, transverse depression well-developed, nearly reaching scutellum, interrupted by small elevation near humeri; posterior 1/3 of lateral margin finely serrate, epipleura well-developed, nearly reaching apex; each elytron with shallow, rather wide depression at anterior 1/3, prolonged, lateral depression at posterior 1/2 and sutural depression at posterior 1/3; sculpture rugose, very fine but dense laterally, disc lustrous with very fine, simple, sparse punctation. +Ventral surface very finely, rather densely punctate, prosternum finely ocellate; anal ventrite narrowly truncate apically, finely serrate laterally. Legs relatively short, slender, metatibiae only slightly emarginate and serrate at posterior 1/3 of inner margins (Fig. 8). + +Aedeagus ( +Fig. 14 +) rather short and robust, parameres with well-developed dorsal fields of bristles. + +Sexual dimorphism. Female differs from male by less projecting eyes, bronze frons, unmodified metatibiae and finely emarginate anal ventrite. + + +FIGURES 13–18. +Male genitalia. 13. + +Anthaxia +( +H. +) +dauensis +Obenberger, 1924 + +, syntype; 14. + +A. +( +H. +) +occulta + + +sp. nov. +, + +holotype; 15. + +A. +( +H. +) +impressipennis + + +sp. nov. +, + +holotype; 16. + +A. +( +H. +) +nasheri + + +sp. nov. +, + +holotype; 17. + +A. +( +H. +) +teloukatiae +Descarpentries & Bruneau + +de Miré, 1963, holotype; 18. + +A. +( +H. +) +zambiana + + +sp. nov. +, + +holotype; a—dorsal view, b—lateral view. + + + +Measurements. +Length: 5.3–7.0 mm ( +holotype +6.2 mm +); width: +2.1–2.8 mm +( +holotype +2.5 mm +). + + +Variability. +No essential variability was observed except for size and various intensity of red lustre on posterior pronotal angles; about one half of +paratypes +possess the same punctiform, pronotal depressions like the +holotype +unlike the rest of +paratypes +which possess regularly convex pronotum (except for lateroposterior depressions). + + +Bionomy. +Allotype and 10 +paratypes +were reared from + +Acacia + +sp. ( +Mimosaceae +). + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet is derived from the Latin adjective “occultus” (hidden) since this species has been overlooked and has been found mixed in collections with + +A. kheiliana + +. + + +Differential diagnosis. + +Anthaxia occulta + +is very similar to the sympatric + +A. kheiliana + +from which it differs by the somewhat smaller size, more intensive bright bronze colouration, less wedge-shaped body, smaller scutellum, slender, only slightly curved male mesotibiae and by the shape of male metatibiae (Figs. 6 vs. 8) and genitalia (Figs. 4 vs. 14). + + + + +Distribution: +Ethiopia +, +Kenya +, +Tanzania +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/03/2F/37032F7E8703E4EB934A85F270C44840.xml b/data/37/03/2F/37032F7E8703E4EB934A85F270C44840.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9da6040ef60 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/03/2F/37032F7E8703E4EB934A85F270C44840.xml @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Cuniculidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +1559 +1560 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + + +Cuniculus paca +Linnaeus 1766 + + + + + + + +Cuniculus paca +Linnaeus 1766 + +, +Syst. Nat., 12th ed., Vol. 1: 81 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +French Guiana +, Cayenne. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Lowland Paca +. + + + + +Subspecies: +: + + +Subspecies + +Cuniculus paca +subsp. +paca +Linnaeus 1766 + + + +Subspecies + +Cuniculus paca +subsp. +guanta +Lönnberg 1921 + + + +Subspecies + +Cuniculus paca +subsp. +mexicanae +Hagmann 1908 + + + +Subspecies + +Cuniculus paca +subsp. +nelsoni +Goldman 1913 + + + +Subspecies + +Cuniculus paca +subsp. +virgata +Bangs 1902 + + + + + +Distribution: +SE +San Luis Potosi +( +Mexico +) to +Paraguay +, Guianas, S +Brazil +, and NE +Argentina +. Introduced into +Cuba +. + + + + +Conservation: +CITES +– Appendix III ( +Honduras +) as + +Agouti paca + +; +IUCN +– Lower Risk (lc) as + +Agouti paca + +. + + + + +Discussion: +Reviewed by Pérez (1992). Five subspecies are recognized (Cabrera, 1961; +Hall, 1981 +) but their status needs reevaluation. Karyotype has 2n=74 and FN=56 ( +Fredga, 1966 +). Preliminary data of the extent of genetic differentiation between geographic separated populations ( +Rowe and Honeycutt, 2002 +) suggests that + +paca + +may represent populations of more than a single species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/03/87/370387B5E070FFB2FC6C505411702F59.xml b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E070FFB2FC6C505411702F59.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e70fec5aaaa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E070FFB2FC6C505411702F59.xml @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ + + + +A preliminary survey and range extension of millipedes species introduced in Brazil (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) + + + +Author + +Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti + + + +Author + +Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Patrícia Elesbão da Silva + + + +Author + +Almeida, Thais Melo de + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio Domingos + +text + + +Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia + + +2021 + +2021-10-27 + + +61 + + +1 +18 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 + +journal article +10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 +1807-0205 +7177234 + + + + + + +Leptogoniulus sorornus +(Butler, 1876) + +( +Figs. 2B +, +6 +E-F) + + + + + +Descriptive notes: +See +Shelley & Lehtinen (1999: 1383 +, figs. 1-7). + + +Note: +An overview of its taxonomic status was made by +Shelley & Lehtinen (1999) +. + + +Identification: +According to the diagnosis made by +Shelley & Lehtinen (1999) +, males of + +L. sorornus + +are recognized by coxae of the anterior gonopods widely separat- ed by apically broad and subtruncate sternum ( +Fig. 6E +), and telopodites apically uncinated. Telopodites of the posterior gonopods with broad medial lobe, and apically rounded with notches along the distal margin ( +Fig. 6F +). + + + + +Distribution: + +Leptogoniulus sorornus + +presents a tropical distribution ( +Hoffman, 1999 +; +Shelley & Lehtinen, 1999 +; +Korsós, 2004 +). In +Brazil +, the species has been recorded in the old-named state of Guanabara (now known as +Rio de Janeiro +), São Mateus, and +Salvador +(approximately +1,500 km +from Rio de Janeiro) ( +Shelley & Lehtinen, 1999 +). All records were obtained from the literature. + + + +Historical records: +Bahia: + + +Salvador +[- +12.9711°S +; - +38.5108°W +], +J. Becker +coll. ( +Schubart, 1958b +) + +; + + +Espírito Santo +: + +São Mateus +[- +18.718937°S +; - +39.861257°W +] ( +Schubart, 1947 +) + +; + + +Rio de Janeiro +: + +Rio de Janeiro +[- +22.9028°S +; - +43.2075°W +] ( +Schubart, 1958b +) + +; + +Corcovado +, +Jardim Botânico +, +Caullery +coll. ( +Brölemann, 1929 +) + +; + +São GonÇalo +[- +22.8269°S +; - +43.0539°W +], +Fazenda Engenho Novo +, +A.C. Aguirre +coll. ( +Schubart, 1947 +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/03/87/370387B5E070FFB2FEA45554110624F9.xml b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E070FFB2FEA45554110624F9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..93827528ff8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E070FFB2FEA45554110624F9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,677 @@ + + + +A preliminary survey and range extension of millipedes species introduced in Brazil (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) + + + +Author + +Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti + + + +Author + +Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Patrícia Elesbão da Silva + + + +Author + +Almeida, Thais Melo de + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio Domingos + +text + + +Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia + + +2021 + +2021-10-27 + + +61 + + +1 +18 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 + +journal article +10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 +1807-0205 +7177234 + + + + + + +Trigoniulus corallinus +(Gervais, 1842) + +( +Figs. 2A +, +4E +, +5 +C-D) + + + + + +Descriptive notes: +See +Shelley & Lehtinen (1999: 1389 +, figs. 8-14). + + +Note: +An overview of its taxonomic status was made by +Shelley & Lehtinen (1999) +. + + +Identification: +The species is easily recognized by the strongly reddish color in life (Fig. 9e). According to the diagnosis made by +Shelley & Lehtinen (1999 +, figs. 11-13), males of + +T. corallinus + +are recognized by the coxae of the anterior gonopods narrowly separated by subtriangular sternum indented in midline; telopodites subtriangular, extending directly mediad ( +Fig. 5C +), telopodites of the posterior gonopods rounded and with broad medial lobe at midlength; two inner projections arising basally from lobe and directed distad; and outer projection with notch on inner margin, expanded distad ( +Fig. 5D +). + + + + +Distribution: + +Trigoniulus corallinus + +presents a tropical distribution ( +Hoffman, 1999 +; +Shelley, 1998b +; +Shelley & Lehtinen, 1999 +; +Korsós, 2004 +; + +Enghoff +et al., +2015 + +). In +Brazil +, the species is distributed predominantly in the North and Northeast regions, occurring in urban and rural areas, greenhouses, and forests. Records from the state of +Rio de Janeiro +are due to its use for the production of organic compost for agriculture ( + +Antunes +et al., +2016 + +, +2019 +). Species of Trigoniulinae distributed in the Neotropical region are supposedly introduced from SE Asia (see +Hoffman, 1994 +; + +Hoffman +et al., +1996 + +). + + + + +Material examined: + + +Roraima +: + +Caracaraí +, + +Serra +da Mocidade + +[ +01.491084°S +; - +61.78333333°W +], + +25.i-06. ii.2016 + +, M. +Oliveira +, +F.F. Xavier +& +T +. +Mahlmann +coll., +♂ +( +INPA +) + +; + +Parque Nacional Serra da Mocidade +, [ +01.074634°S +; - +61.900000001°W +], + +15-26.i.2016 + +, F.F. +Xavier +, +R +. +Boldrini +& +P. Barroso +coll., +2♂ +2♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + +Igarapé Caicubi +[ +00.560220°S +; - +62.168280°W +], +Pupunha +, +pitfall +, + +22.x.2008 + +, +Ana +coll., +♂ +♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + + +Amazonas +: + +Manaus +, campus +INPA +[- +03.0960583°S +; - +59.9894389°W +], + +12.vii.2016 + +, +D.P. Cordeiro +coll., +♂ +( +INPA +) + +; + + +Pará +: + +Belém +, +Bairro Terra Firme +[- +01.457070°S +; - +48.451254°W +], + +22-23. vi.2010 + +, +R +. +Ott +coll., +4♂ +6♀ +( +MCN 659 +) + +; + +17♂ +11♀ +3 immatures +( +MPEG +Myr-00048) + +; + + +Tocantins +: + +Araguaína +[- +15.200975°S +; - +51.852218°W +], campus UFT, + +02.xi.2016 + +, +M. Lopes +coll., +♂ +♀ +( +IBSP 7494 +) + +; + + +13.xi.2016 + +, +M. Lopes +coll., +Quintal de Casa +, +4♂ +3♀ +( +IBSP 7495 +) + +; + +Bairro da Cimba +, + +08.viii.2015 + +, F. +Costa +coll., +♂ +♀ +( +IBSP 7496 +) + +; + + +16.ix.2014 + +, +V +. +S. Marinho +coll., +Urban area +, +♀ +( +IBSP 7497 +) + +; + + +Pernambuco +: + +Recife +[- +08.056951°S +; - +34.929493°W +], + +26.vi.1946 + +, +M.L. Siqueira +coll., +2♂ +( +MZSP +) + +; + +campus +Instituto Ricardo Brennand +[- +08.055537°S +; - +34.959112°W +], + +27.viii.2010 + +, +R +. +Ott +coll., +♂ +8♀ +( +MCN 611 +) + +; + + +Rio de Janeiro +: + +Rio de Janeiro +[- +22.921765°S +; - +43.169510°W +], + +13.xii.1954 + +, +H. Lopes +coll., +♂ +( +MZSP +) + +. + + +Historical records: + + +Amazonas +: + +Manaus +[- +03.023045°S +; - +59.965390°W +], +Bicego +coll., +8♂ +2♀ +( +Brölemann, 1902 +) + +; + +Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental +[- +02.893744°S +; - +59.973109°W +] ( +Hofffman +et al., +2002) + +; + + +Pará +: + +Ananindeua +, +Aurá +[- +01.408310°S +;- +48.397542°W +], + +05.iii.1958 + +, +L.Travassos +coll., +3♂ +10♀ +( +Schubart, 1958b +) + +; +04.iii.1958 +, +♀ +( +Schubart, 1958b +); + +Entrada de Utinga +[- +01.42599°S +; - +48.444631°W +], + +12.iii.1958 + +, +L. Travassos +coll., +2♂ +2♀ +( +Schubart, 1958b +) + +; + + +Pernambuco +: + +Recife +[- +08.0539°S +; - +34.8811°W +], +Bairro dos Afogados +, 14.xiii.1934, +O. Schubart +coll. ( +Schubart, 1958b +) + +; + +Bairro do Payssandú +, + +26.iv.1946 + +, +M.L. Siqueira +coll., +4♂ +6♀ 2♀ +immature ( +Schubart, 1958b +) + +; + + +Rio de Janeiro +: + +Rio de Janeiro +, +Bairro Leblon +[- +22.985714°S +; - +43.222412°W +], + +25.xii.1941 + +, +A.C. Aguirre +coll., +2♂ +4♀ +( +Schubart, 1958b +) + +; + +Bairro Brás de Pina +[- +22.831870°S +; - +43.296731°W +], + +25.iii.1947 + +, +A.C. Aguirre +coll., +2♂ ♂ +immature ( +Schubart, 1958b +) + +; + +Bairro do Andaraí +[- +22.927367°S +; - +43.251521°W +], + +i.1953 + +, +J. Becker +coll., +2♀ +( +Schubart, 1958b +) + +; + +campus +Universidade Rural +,km 47 [- +22.768546°S +; - +43.687338°W +], + +xii.1957 + +, +H.S. Lópes +coll., +♂ +2♀ +( +Schubart, 1958b +) + +; + +Seropédica +[- +22.768582°S +; - +43.706134°W +], 2017, +L.F.S. Antunes +et al. +coll. ( + +Antunes +et al., +2019 + +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/03/87/370387B5E072FFB0FC6D513411302F59.xml b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E072FFB0FC6D513411302F59.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b4c995c352d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E072FFB0FC6D513411302F59.xml @@ -0,0 +1,193 @@ + + + +A preliminary survey and range extension of millipedes species introduced in Brazil (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) + + + +Author + +Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti + + + +Author + +Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Patrícia Elesbão da Silva + + + +Author + +Almeida, Thais Melo de + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio Domingos + +text + + +Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia + + +2021 + +2021-10-27 + + +61 + + +1 +18 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 + +journal article +10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 +1807-0205 +7177234 + + + + + + +Glyphiulus granulatus +(Gervais, 1847) + +( +Figs. 1C +, +4 +C-D, 6B) + + + + + +Descriptive notes: +See + +Golovatch +et al. +(2007: 12 + +, figs. 1-6). + + +Identification: +Males of + +G. granulatus + +are recognized by a median outgrowth of the coxosternum in the anterior gonopods ( + +Golovatch +et al., +2007 + +: fig. 5a, b; +Fig. 6B +) and the typical pattern of carinotaxy. As in + +T. calvus +, + +the species is easily identified when compared with Brazilian species of +Spirostreptida +by having tergites longitudinally crested ( +Fig. 4 +C-D) and the presence of posterior gonopod (see + +Golovatch +et al., +2007: 12 + +). + + + + +Distribution: + +G. granulatus + +has been recorded in SE Asia and in islands in the Pacific and Indian oceans ( +Shelley, 1998a +; +Jeekel, 2004 +; +Korsós, 2004 +; + +Enghoff +et al., +2015 + +). In +Brazil +, the species occurs only in urban areas in Santa Maria, state of + +Rio Grande +do Sul + +. + + + + +Material examined: + + + +Rio Grande +do Sul + +: + +Santa Maria +[- +29.6914°S +; - +53.8008°W +], +Universidade Federal de Santa Maria +, + +17.iv.2014 + +, +V +. +M. Silva +coll., +8♂ +5♀ +( +MCN +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/03/87/370387B5E072FFB0FEB6535411932219.xml b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E072FFB0FEB6535411932219.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..de385dd6705 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E072FFB0FEB6535411932219.xml @@ -0,0 +1,306 @@ + + + +A preliminary survey and range extension of millipedes species introduced in Brazil (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) + + + +Author + +Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti + + + +Author + +Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Patrícia Elesbão da Silva + + + +Author + +Almeida, Thais Melo de + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio Domingos + +text + + +Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia + + +2021 + +2021-10-27 + + +61 + + +1 +18 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 + +journal article +10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 +1807-0205 +7177234 + + + + + + +Trachyjulus calvus +(Pocock, 1893a) + +( +Figs. 1D +, +6 +C-D) + + + + + +Descriptive notes: +Male, see + +Golovatch +et al. +(2012: 114 + +, figs. 8-9). + + +Identification: + +T.calvus + +is easily separated from Brazilian species of +Spirostreptida +by having tergites longitudinally crested ( + +Golovatch +et al., +2012 + +: fig. 8) and the presence of posterior gonopod. According to the diagnosis made by + +Golovatch +et al. +(2012) + +,males are recognized by lateral coxal process of the anterior gonopod being very slen- der ( +Fig. 6C +); slender and conical medial coxal process; posterior gonopod with axe-shaped flagellum extended and with microgranulate distal lobules ( +Fig. 6D +). + + + + +Distribution: + +T. calvus + +presents a tropical distribution ( + +Golovatch +et al., +2012 + +). In +Brazil +, the species has been recorded only in urban areas from states of +Rio de Janeiro +and +Bahia +( +ca. +1,500 km +). + + + + + +Material examined: +Bahia: + + +Salvador +, campus +UFBA +[- +13.004364°S +; - +38.508978°W +], 2013, +C.M.P. Leite +coll., +♂ +( +UFMT +) + +. + + +Records: + + +Rio de Janeiro +: + +Rio de Janeiro +, +Bairro Tijuca +[- +22.935505°S +;- +43.243112°W +], + +17.v.1938 + +, +A.C. Aguirre +coll., +11♀ +1 immature +( +Schubart, 1946b +) + +; + + +vi.1938 + +, +A.C. Aguirre +coll., +♀ +( +Schubart,1946b +) + +; +21.v.1939 +,A.C.Aguirre coll., +3♂ +9♀ +8 immatures +( +Schubart, 1946b +); +12.ix.1939 +, A.C. Aguirre coll., +♂ +1 immature +( +Schubart, 1946b +); +29.x.1939 +, A.C. Aguirre coll., +6 immatures +( +Schubart, 1946b +); +27.xi.1939 +, A.C. Aguirre coll., +4 immatures +( +Schubart, 1946b +); +30.i.1940 +, A.C. Aguirre coll., +3♂ +4♀ +( +Schubart, 1946b +); +30.iv.1940 +, A.C. Aguirre coll., +5♀ +4 immatures +( +Schubart, 1946b +); +05.vi.1940 +, A.C. Aguirre coll., +♀ +( +Schubart, 1946b +); +11.vi.1940 +, A.C. Aguirre coll., +4♀ +3 immatures +( +Schubart, 1946b +); +04.viii.1940 +, A.C. Aguirre coll., +2♂ +4♀ +2 immatures +( +Schubart, 1946b +); +14.ix.1940 +, A.C. Aguirre coll., +5♂ +10♀ +1 immature +( +Schubart, 1946b +); +30.vii.1939 +, A.C. Aguirre coll., +♀ +( +Schubart, 1946b +); +15.ix.1939 +, A.C. Aguirre coll., +93♂ +133♀ +27 immatures +( +Schubart, 1946b +); +13.iv.1946 +, A.C. Aguirre coll., +2♂ +4♀ +4 immatures +( +Schubart, 1946b +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/03/87/370387B5E074FFB6FEB7561416BA2039.xml b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E074FFB6FEB7561416BA2039.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d54003f837e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E074FFB6FEB7561416BA2039.xml @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@ + + + +A preliminary survey and range extension of millipedes species introduced in Brazil (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) + + + +Author + +Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti + + + +Author + +Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Patrícia Elesbão da Silva + + + +Author + +Almeida, Thais Melo de + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio Domingos + +text + + +Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia + + +2021 + +2021-10-27 + + +61 + + +1 +18 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 + +journal article +10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 +1807-0205 +7177234 + + + + + + + +Rhinotus purpureus +(Pocock, 1894) + + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 2C +, +4F +, +5 +E-F) + + + +Descriptive notes: +See +Mauriès (1980: 1101 +, fig. 62) and +Wesener (2014: 588 +, figs. 1-2, for the synonym + +P.malagassum + +). + + +Identification: +Native species of +Polyzoniida +in +Brazil +belong to the genera + +Siphonotus +Brandt, 1837 + +and + +Burinia +Attems, 1926 + +( +Hoffman, 1977 +, +1980 +; + +Enghoff +et al., +2015 + +). Males of + +R. purpureus + +are recognized by having sternite of anterior gonopod with two lobes carrying long setae; coxae with trichostele carrying long setae; third podomere laterally with short setae and carrying mesally a protruding channel ( +Mauriès, 1980 +: fig. 62; +Wesener, 2014 +:fig. 2a; +Fig. 5E +).Posterior gonopod sternite elongat- ed into two lobes; each one with apical setae; remaining podemeres partly fused and difficult to distinguish; tarsus elongated and apically with short claw ( +Wesener, 2014 +: fig. 2b; +Fig. 5F +). + + + + +Distribution: +The range extension of + +R. purpureus + +is not known and its native area is still uncertain ( +Hoffman, 1999 +). The species has been recorded in the Neotropical region ( +Shelley, 1998c +),West Africa, +Mauritius +, East Indies ( +Hoffman, 1999 +), +Madagascar +( +Wesener, 2014 +), and Asia ( +Hoffman, 1977 +; +Korsós, 2004 +). In +Brazil +, the species has been recorded in urban areas from Manaus and from uncertain localities in the state of +Amazonas +(see + +Hoffman +et al., +1996 + +, +2002 +). + + + + +Material examined: + + +Amazonas +: + +Manaus +, sítio +Vida Tropical +, +AM 010 +, km 35 [- +02.759189°S +; - +59.920910°W +], + +11.xi.2017 + +, +T +. +M. Almeida +& +J.A. Rafael +coll., +11♂ +22♀ +( +INPA +) + +. + + +Historical records: + + +Amazonas +: + +Manaus +[- +03.063877°S +; - +60.036493°W +], Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental [- +02.893744°S +; - +59.973109°W +] ( + +Hoffman +et al., +2002 + +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/03/87/370387B5E077FFB5FCF0555411712299.xml b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E077FFB5FCF0555411712299.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5be9186a44d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E077FFB5FCF0555411712299.xml @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ + + + +A preliminary survey and range extension of millipedes species introduced in Brazil (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) + + + +Author + +Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti + + + +Author + +Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Patrícia Elesbão da Silva + + + +Author + +Almeida, Thais Melo de + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio Domingos + +text + + +Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia + + +2021 + +2021-10-27 + + +61 + + +1 +18 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 + +journal article +10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 +1807-0205 +7177234 + + + + + + +Cylindroiulus britannicus +(Verhoeff, 1891) + +( +Figs. 1D +, +7E +) + + + + + +Descriptive notes: +See +Schubart (1942c: 250 +, fig. 1) and +Blower (1985: 158 +, fig. 49). + + +Identification: +Members of +Julida +are easily recognized by stipites of gnathochilarium in contact in the midline in their basal part (symphyognathous condition). The species is recognized by three pairs of setae on the anal valves ( +Blower, 1985 +: fig. 49a); opisthomerite with finger-shaped projection ( +Blower, 1985 +: fig. 49b); promerite simple; mesomerite shorter than promerite ( +Fig. 7E +). + + + + +Distribution: +The order +Julida +is distributed in the Holarctic region, marginally also in SE Asia and Central America ( + +Enghoff +et al., +2015 + +). + +Cylindroiulus britannicus + +is widespread in Europe and predominantly distributed in the Northwest region ( +Blower, 1985 +). The species has been recorded in southern +India +, +New Zealand +, +South Africa +( +Hoffman, 1999 +), +Chile +, and +Argentina +( +Golovatch, 2014 +; + +Shelley +et al., +2014 + +). In +Brazil +, the species has been recorded only in urban areas in the states of +São Paulo +and +Rio de Janeiro +. All records of the species were obtained from the literature. + + +Historical records: + + +São Paulo +: + +Pirassununga +[- +22.005841°S +; - +47.424516°W +], + +23.vii.1940 + +- + +13.ii.1941 + +, +O. Schubart +coll., +2♂ +2♀ +4 immatures +( +Schubart, 1942c +) + +; + +São Paulo +, +Bairro Santo Amaro +[- +23.654909°S +; - +46.703473°W +], 1954, +O. Schubart +coll., +♂ +♀ +1 immature +( +Schubart, 1945a +) + +; + +Água Branca +[- +23.517304°S +; - +46.690714°W +] ( +Schubart, 1944 +) + +; + +Bairro do Tremembé +[- +23.468582°S +; - +46.624367°W +] ( +Schubart, 1947 +) + +; + + +Rio de Janeiro +: + +Itatiaia +[- +22.458524°S +; - +44.562840°W +] ( +Schubart, 1947 +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/03/87/370387B5E077FFB5FF025034161F2F59.xml b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E077FFB5FF025034161F2F59.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f2993113b73 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E077FFB5FF025034161F2F59.xml @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ + + + +A preliminary survey and range extension of millipedes species introduced in Brazil (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) + + + +Author + +Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti + + + +Author + +Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Patrícia Elesbão da Silva + + + +Author + +Almeida, Thais Melo de + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio Domingos + +text + + +Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia + + +2021 + +2021-10-27 + + +61 + + +1 +18 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 + +journal article +10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 +1807-0205 +7177234 + + + + + + +Paraspirobolus lucifugus +(Gervais, 1837) + +( +Figs. 2C +, +7 +C-D) + + + + + +Descriptive notes: +See +Attems (1900 +: figs. 13-16) and +Brölemann (1902: 184 +, figs. 223-227). + + +Identification: +According to the descriptions made by +Attems (1900) +and +Brölemann (1902) +, males of + +P. lucifugus + +can be recognized by the anterior and posterior gonopods. Coxae of the anterior gonopods separated by wide sternum slightly indented in midline ( +Attems, 1900 +: figs.13-14; +Brölemann,1902 +:fig. 226; +Fig.7C +).Telopodites of the posterior gonopods apically fusiform and with a broad lobe ( +Attems,1900 +: fig. 16; +Fig. 7D +). An overview of its taxonomic status was made by +Jeekel (2001) +. + + + + +Distribution: + +Paraspirobolus lucifugus + +is widespread in the tropics and in greenhouses from Europe ( +Jeekel, 2001 +; + +Enghoff +et al., +2004 + +; +Korsós,2004 +). In +Brazil +,the species has been recorded only in the coastal region from the Atlantic Forest and in urban areas. All records of the species were obtained from the literature. + + + +Historical records: + +Espírito Santo +: + + +São Mateus [- +18.718937°S +; - +39.861257°W +] ( +Schubart, 1947 +); + +Rio de Janeiro +: + +Rio de Janeiro +, Tijuca [- +22.935505°S +; - +43.243112°W +] ( +Schubart, 1947 +); Jacarepaguá [- +22.953677°S +; - +43.408759°W +] ( +Schubart, 1947 +). + +São Paulo +: + +Aparecida do Norte [- +22.867750°S +; - +45.228194°W +] ( +Schubart, 1947 +); Ilhabela [- +23.817663°S +; - +45.369504°W +], +xi.1896 +, +2♂ +5♀ +( +Brölemann, 1902 +); Santos [- +23.974598°S +; - +46.307597°W +], +ix.1896 +, +♀ +( +Brölemann, 1902 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/03/87/370387B5E077FFB6FCC851B416F726D9.xml b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E077FFB6FCC851B416F726D9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d6e1b6957ff --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E077FFB6FCC851B416F726D9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ + + + +A preliminary survey and range extension of millipedes species introduced in Brazil (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) + + + +Author + +Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti + + + +Author + +Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Patrícia Elesbão da Silva + + + +Author + +Almeida, Thais Melo de + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio Domingos + +text + + +Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia + + +2021 + +2021-10-27 + + +61 + + +1 +18 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 + +journal article +10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 +1807-0205 +7177234 + + + + + + +Cylindroiulus truncorum +(Silvestri, 1896) + +( +Figs. 2B +, +7F +) + + + + + +Descriptive notes: +Male, see +Blower (1985: 162 +, fig. 51) and +Korsós & Enghoff (1990: 347 +, figs. 1, 5-8, 21, 30, 31). + + +Identification: +According to the diagnosis made by +Korsós & Enghoff (1990) +, males of + +C. truncorum + +are recognized by promerite of gonopods slightly longer than mesomerite, without a deep mesal incision; opisthomerite with laterad bent smooth brachit, without setae or protuberances; paracoxal process long, slender and pointed, almost reaching the end of solenomerite ( +Blower, 1985 +: fig. 51; +Fig. 7F +). + + + + +Distribution: +It is widespread in Europe and North Africa, probably by several events of introduction ( +Blower, 1985 +; +Korsós & Enghoff, 1990 +). The species has been reported in Hawaii, North and South America ( + +Shelley +et al., +1998 + +; +Hoffman, 1999 +). + +Cylindroiulus truncorum + +occurs mainly in synanthropic habitats such as greenhouses, gardens, and parks ( +Korsós & Enghoff, 1990 +). In +Brazil +, the species has been recorded only in urban areas in +São Paulo +. All records of the species were obtained from the literature. + + +Historical records: + + +São Paulo +: + +São Paulo +, + +Bairro dos +Campos Elíseos + +[- +23.5475°S +; - +46.6361°W +], + +03.iii.1944 + +, +O. Schubart +& +J. Schubart +coll. ( +Schubart, 1946a +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/03/87/370387B5E078FFBAFE865514161626B9.xml b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E078FFBAFE865514161626B9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e9164d62a99 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E078FFBAFE865514161626B9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + +A preliminary survey and range extension of millipedes species introduced in Brazil (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) + + + +Author + +Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti + + + +Author + +Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Patrícia Elesbão da Silva + + + +Author + +Almeida, Thais Melo de + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio Domingos + +text + + +Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia + + +2021 + +2021-10-27 + + +61 + + +1 +18 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 + +journal article +10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 +1807-0205 +7177234 + + + + + + + +Oxidus gracilis +(C.L. Koch, 1847) + + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 1A +, +4B +, +5A +) + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/03/87/370387B5E07FFFBFFF075294106E2F59.xml b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E07FFFBFFF075294106E2F59.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fbc013139df --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/03/87/370387B5E07FFFBFFF075294106E2F59.xml @@ -0,0 +1,2205 @@ + + + +A preliminary survey and range extension of millipedes species introduced in Brazil (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) + + + +Author + +Iniesta, Luiz Felipe Moretti + + + +Author + +Bouzan, Rodrigo Salvador + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Patrícia Elesbão da Silva + + + +Author + +Almeida, Thais Melo de + + + +Author + +Ott, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Brescovit, Antonio Domingos + +text + + +Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia + + +2021 + +2021-10-27 + + +61 + + +1 +18 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 + +journal article +10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.88 +1807-0205 +7177234 + + + + + + +Orthomorpha coarctata +(Saussure, 1860) + +( +Figs. 1B +, +4A +, +5B +) + + + + + +Descriptive notes: +See + +Likhitrakarn +et al. +(2011: 12 + +, figs. 4-8). + + + + +Note: +Based on examined material, immatures and females of + +O. coarctata + +cannot be identified and morphologically distinguished from those of + +Oxidus gracilis +. + +The species was placed in the genus +Asiomorpha +by +Verhoeff (1939) +, and its taxonomic position is under discussion (see + +Likhitrakarn +et al., +2011 + +, +2019 +; +Nguyen & Sierwald, 2013 +).For a listing purpose,we maintained the species in + +Orthomorpha + +according to the latest taxonomic reviews (for more details, see + +Likhitrakarn +et al., +2011 + +, +2019 +). + + +Identification: +The species can be easily separated from autochthones Neotropical paradoxosomatids mainly by gonopod features ( +Fig. 5B +). Males of + +O. coarctata + +are recognized by a single terminal lobule on gonopod tip; spikes and denticles either missing or nearly missing ( + +Likhitrakarn +et al., +2011 + +, +2019 +). + + + + +Distribution: +The species is widely distributed in the tropics ( +Nguyen & Sierwald, 2013 +), occurring in +USA +, +Hawaii +( + +Shelley +et al., +1998 + +), Caribbean islands ( +Nguyen & Sierwald, 2013 +), and SE Asia ( +Korsós, 2004 +). + +Orthomorpha coarctata + +is distributed predominantly in the North and Southeast regions in +Brazil +, occurring in urban and rural areas, greenhouses, forests, and islands. + + + + + +Material examined: +Acre: + + +Rio Branco +[- +09.95938889°S +; - +67.85665556°W +], + +09.x.2017 + +, +J.A. Rafael +coll., +♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + + +Amazonas +: + +Boca do Tefé +[- +03.488378°S +; - +64.843366°W +], mata +rio Solimões +, + +ix.1952 + +, +Equipe +IBSP +coll., +6♂ +2♀ +( +IBSP 106 +) + +; + +Careiro da Várzea +, +Ilha +do +Careiro +[- +03.16607500°S +; - +59.73265278°W +], + +08.vii.1997 + +, +K. Vohland +coll., +♂ +( +INPA +) + +; + +Manaus +, +Residencial Nascentes do Tarumã +[- +02.99222222°S +; - +60.03416667°W +], + +05.vii.2016 + +, +T +. +Mahlmann +coll., +20♂ +61♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + +Igarapé Cururu +[- +03.12666667°S +; - +59.94055556°W +], + +22-24. ii.2007 + +, +N.O. Aguiar +et al., +coll., +♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + +Bosque da Ciência +[- +03.09743889°S +; - +59.98781389°W +], + +07.v.2017 + +, +T +. +M. Almeida +coll., +31♂ +13♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + +Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia +, campus II [- +03.096214°S +; - +59.989578°W +], + +20.iv.2016 + +, +2♂ +( +INPA +) + +; + +campus +INPA +, secondary forest [- +03.13333333°S +; - +60.01666667°W +], + +03.viii.1995 + +, J. +Adis +et al., +coll., +21♀ +10♂ +( +INPA +) + +; + +campus of +Universidade Federal do Amazonas +( +UFAM +) [- +03.10024444°S +; - +59.97850000°W +], + +07.x.2005 + +, +M.L. Custódio +coll., +♂ +2♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + + +09.ii.2015 + +, N. +T +. +B.Antunes +coll., +♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + +Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental +, banana plantation, near the +Climatology +laboratory [- +02.893680556°S +; - +59.9730667°W +], + +28.iv.2016 + +, +T +. +M. Almeida +& +A.E.C. Silveira +coll., +3♂ +♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + +Reserva Florestal Adolpho Ducke +[- +02.96334444°S +; - +59.92283333°W +], + +17.v.2014 + +, +7♂ +6♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + + +23.vii.2015 + +, +2♂ +( +INPA +) + +; + + +20.xii.2018 + +, +T +. +M. Almeida +coll., +6♂ +, +4♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + +20♀ +20♂ +( +INPA +) + +; + +Presidente Figueiredo +[- +01.797656°S +; - +59.973303°W +], + +16.vii.1996 + +, +K. Vohland +coll., +♀ +♂ +( +INPA +) + +; + + +Rondônia +: + +Porto Velho +, +Parque Municipal +[- +10.738177°S +; - +62.218467°W +], + +02.iii.2010 + +, +G. Miranda +coll., +♂ +2♀ +1 immature +( +MNRJ +) + +; + +Porto Velho +, campus +Universidade Federal de Rondônia +– +UNIR +[- +08.76349167°S +; - +63.906575°W +], tree trunk, + +14.xi.2016 + +, +A. Andriolo +coll., +♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + + +Pará +: + +Itaituba +[- +04.275500°S +; - +55.992846°W +], + +08.vii.2003 + +, +J. de Fronte +coll., +5♂ +3♀ +( +MCTP 124 +) + +; + +Belém +, +Campus +MPEG +[- +01.451628°S +; - +48.446535°W +], + +10-30.vi.2010 + +, +R +. +Ott +coll., +♂ +♀ +( +MPEG +) + +; + +Belterra +, urban area [- +03.161651°S +; - +54.965476°W +], + +26-29.x.2009 + +, +Equipe +IBSP +coll., +♂ +( +IBSP 7758 +) + +; + + +Paraíba +: + +João Pessoa +[- +07.124538°S +; - +34.845187°W +], +O. Schubart +coll., +♂ +( +MNRJ 11721 +) + +; + + +x.1935 + +, +O. Schubart +coll., +16 specimens +( +MNRJ 11707 +) + +; + + +10.x.1935 + +, +L. Cordeiro +coll., +2♂ +( +MNRJ 11692 +) + +; + + +Pernambuco +: + +Recife +[- +08.056951°S +; - +34.929493°W +], +O. Schubart +coll., +2♂ +2♀ +( +MNRJ 11705 +) + +; + +2♀ +( +MNRJ 11690 +) + +; + +♂ +( +MNRJ 11687 +) + +; + +♀ +( +MNRJ 11712 +) + +; + +O. Schubart +coll., +2♂ +3♀ +( +MNRJ11715 +) + +; + + +29.i.1935 + +, +O.Schubart +coll., +♂ +( +MNRJ 11709 +) + +; + +Parque Estadual de Dois Irmãos +, + +ix.1936 + +, +O. Schubart +coll., +♂ +( +MNRJ 11688 +) + +; + +Jiquiá +, +O. Schubart +coll., +12♂ +( +MNRJ 11699 +) + +; + +Tegipió +[- +08.056961°S +; - +34.929503°W +], + +06.i.1932 + +, +O. Schubart +coll., +♀ +2 immatures +( +MNRJ 11718 +) + +; + +Torres +[- +08.056958°S +;- +34.929500°W +], +O. Schubart +coll., +♂ +♀ +1 immature +( +MNRJ 11720 +) + +; + +Ilha Itamaracá +[- +08.056961°S +; - +34.929503°W +], +O. Schubart +coll., +24♂ +( +MNRJ 11704 +) + +; + +Ruínas do Engenho Amparo +, +O. Schubart +coll., +♂ +2♀ +( +MNRJ 11713 +) + +; + +Fernando de Noronha +[- +03.863123°S +; - +32.440625°W +], +Praia do Leão +, + +10.vi.2019 + +, +♂ +♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + +Ilha Rata +, + +01-09.vi.2019 + +, +J.A. Rafael +& +D.M.M. Mendes +coll., +♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + +Trilha +do Capim- AÇu, + +01-09.vi.2019 + +, +J.A. Rafael +, +F. Limeira-de-Oliveira +& +D.M.M. Mende +coll., +3♂ +2♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + +Mangue +, southeast part of +Ilha Rata +mangue, + +01-09.vi.2019 + +, +J.A. Rafael +, +F. Limeira-de-Oliveira +& +D.M.M. Mende +coll., +♀ +( +INPA +) + +; + + +Tocantins +: + +Araguaína +[- +15.200975°S +; - +51.852218°W +], +São João +, + +05.xi.2016 + +, +K.S. Pacheco +coll., +2♂ +1 immature +( +IBSP 7500 +) + +; + +Setor Cimba +, + +22.x.2014 + +, +J. Pereira +coll., +♂ +( +IBSP 7498 +) + +; + +Lageado +[- +09.871592°S +; - +48.297346°W +], +Área +urbana, + +23.iv.2002 + +, +I. Knysak +, +R +. +Martins +& +G. Puorto +coll., +19♂ +5♀ +6 immatures +( +IBSP 1556 +) + +; + +Palmas +[- +09.760156°S +; - +48.378491°W +], +U.H.E. Luís Eduardo Magalhães +, + +22.xi.2000 + +, I. +Knysak +, +R +. +Martins +& +G. Puorto +coll., +♂ +( +IBSP 857 +) + +; + + +22.xi.2000 + +, +R +. +Martins +& +G. Puorto +coll., +8♂ +14♀ +1 immature +( +IBSP 846 +) + +; + + +21.iii.2001 + +, +R +. +Martins +& +G. Puorto +coll., +♂ +2♀ +1 immature +( +IBSP 880 +) + +; + +♂ +♀ +( +IBSP 881 +) + +; + +♀ +( +IBSP 873 +) + +; + +♀ +( +IBSP 863 +) + +; + +4♂ +4♀ +1 immature +( +IBSP 883 +) + +; + +Porto Nacional +[- +10.759459°S +; - +48.398068°W +], +Ribeirão Santa Luzia, U.H.E +. +Luís Eduardo Magalhães +, + +20.i.2000 + +, I. +Knysak +, +R +. +Martins +& +G. Puorto +coll., +4♂ +♀ +( +IBSP 938 +) + +; + +Wanderlândia +[- +06.929806°S +; - +48.006315°W +], + +30.ix.2014 + +, +♂ +( +IBSP 7499 +). + +Mato Grosso +: + +Cuiabá +[- +15.600776°S +; - +56.074270°W +], + +14.v.2015 + +, +Francisco +coll., +3♂ +( +UFMT +) + +; + +Pedregal +, + +12.vii.2012 + +, +R +. +Pinto +coll., +♂ +( +UFMT +) + +; + +campus UFMT, + +17.viii.2016 + +, +B. Martins +coll., +♂ +( +UFMT +) + +; + + +23.v.2017 + +, +T +. +Amorim +coll., +2♂ +3♀ +( +UFMT +) + +; + + +26.vi.2017 + +, +G. Brunna +coll., +♂ +( +UFMT +) + +; + + +xii.2012 + +, +V +. +S. Falcio +coll., +♂ +( +UFMT +) + +; + + +09.vii.2017 + +, J. +R +. +Silva +coll., +2♂ +( +UFMT +) + +; + + +19.viii.2016 + +, +K. Fonseca +& +M. Martello +coll., +2♂ +♀ +( +UFMT +) + +; + +CPA III, + +17.ii.2011 + +, +C.C.L. Dias +coll., +♂ +( +UFMT +) + +; + + +15.v.2011 + +, +A.F.S. Assis +coll., +♂ +( +UFMT +) + +; + +Bairro Tijucal +, + +18.vii.2010 + +, +R +. +Moraes +coll., +♂ +( +UFMT +) + +; + +Várzea Grande +[- +15.650197°S +; - +56.132670°W +], + +16.ix.2013 + +, +A.C. Santos +coll., +♂ +( +UFMT +) + +; + + +Minas Gerais +: + +Belo Horizonte +[- +19.921015°S +; - +43.947253°W +], + +01.i.1999 + +, +A.J. Santos +coll., +♂ +♀ +( +IBSP 1306 +) + +; + +FAE +UFMG +[- +19.873236°S +;- +43.966837°W +], + +iv.2006 + +, +L. Bernardi +coll., +4♂ +♀ +( +IBSP 2910 +) + +; + +Raul Soares +, +São Vicente +da Estrela +[- +19.960899°S +; - +42.438840°W +], + +06.i.2002 + +, +E.N. de Jesus +coll., +♂ +2♀ +( +IBSP 961 +) + +; + +Cordisburgo +[- +19.067019°S +; - +44.215763°W +], + +25.x.1947 + +, +O. Schubart +coll., +2♂ +1 immature +( +MZSP +) + +; + +Três Rios +[- +22.110134°S +; - +43.208401°W +], +Road +to +Rio de Janeiro +, + +12.x.1947 + +, +O. Schubart +coll., +5♂ +♀ +2 immatures +( +MZSP +) + +; + +2♂ +7♀ +3 immatures +( +MZSP +) + +; + + +Espírito Santo +: + +Sooretama +[- +19.178587°S +; - +40.098118°W +], plantaÇão de café, + +24.ii.2011 + +, +A.F. +R +. +Teixeira +coll., +♂ +♀ +( +MCN 1184 +) + +; + +♂ +♀ +( +MCN 1218 +) + +; + +♀ +( +MCN 1183 +) + +; + +♂ +( +MCN 1185 +) + +; + +2♂ +♀ +( +MCN 1210 +) + +; + +5♂ +8♀ +( +MCN 1199 +) + +; + +4♂ +7♀ +( +MCN 1188 +) + +; + + +30.iii.2011 + +, +A.F. +R +. +Teixeira +coll., +27♂ +53♀ +18 immature +( +MCN +) + +; + + +24.iv.2011 + +, +A.F. +R +. +Teixeira +coll., +2♂ +3♀ +1 immature +( +MCN +) + +; + + +25.v.2011 + +, +A.F. +R +. +Teixeira +coll., +♂ +( +MCN +) + +; + + +Rio de Janeiro +: + +Mangaratiba +, +Rio Junqueira +[- +22.930954°S +; - +44.038933°W +], +O. Schubart +coll., +71♀ +( +MNRJ 11697 +) + +; + +Rio de Janeiro +[- +22.921765°S +; - +43.169510°W +], + +28.iii.1951 + +, +J. Becker +coll., +2♂ +♀ +( +MNRJ +) + +; + +O. Schubart +coll., +♂ +( +MZSP +) + +; + + +São Paulo +: + +Ubatuba +[- +23.446317°S +; - +45.087149°W +], + +12-13.ix.1998 + +, +R +. +Martins +coll., +♂ +♀ +( +IBSP 680 +) + +; + +Piracaia +[- +23.059153°S +; - +46.360347°W +], + +x.1996 + +, +S. Rocha +coll., +♂ +( +IBSP 691 +) + +; + +Itu +[- +23.272062°S +; - +47.299290°W +], + +11.iv.1985 + +, +R +. +D’Ávila +coll., +13♂ +4♀ +( +IBSP 667 +) + +; + +São Paulo +, +Jardim Rizzo +[- +23.572008°S +; - +46.732739°W +], + +20.xi.1998 + +, +Eq. +IBSP +coll., +♂ +( +IBSP 7759 +) + +; + + +Paraná +: + +Curitiba +[- +25.495342°S +; - +49.303308°W +], +2♂ +♀ +( +IBSP 7760 +) + +. + + + +Figure 4. Introduced species in Brazil, habitus: (A) + +Orthomorpha coarctata +; + +(B) + +Oxidus gracilis +; + +(C, D) + +Glyphiulus granulatus +; + +(E) + +Trigoniulus corallinus +; + +(F) + +Rhinotus purpureus +. + +Scale bars:2 mm (A, B, E);500 µm (C,D); 200 µm (F). + + + + +Historical records: +Amazonas: + + +Manaus +[- +03.023045°S +; - +59.965390°W +], +Bicego +coll. ( +Brölemann, 1904 +) + +; + +Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental +[- +02.893744°S +; - +59.973109°W +] ( +Hofffman +et al., +2002) + +; + + +Paraíba +: + +João Pessoa +[- +07.1150°S +; - +34.8631°W +], + +10.vii.1937 + +, +E. Cordeiro +coll. ( +Schubart, 1939 +) + +; + + +Pernambuco +: + +Recife +[- +08.0539°S +; - +34.8811°W +], +Bairro dos Afogados +, 1935 ( +Schubart, 1942a +) + +; + +margin of +Rio Capibaribe +, + +30.i.1935 + +( +Schubart, 1942a +) + +; + +margin of +Rio Beberibe +, + +31.iii.1935 + +( +Schubart, 1942a +) + +; + +Madalena +, + +25.iv.1935 + +( +Schubart, 1942a +) + +; + +Bairro Torre +, + +16.vii.1936 + +( +Schubart, 1942a +) + +; + +Bairro Dois Irmãos +, 1934 ( +Schubart, 1939 +) + +; + +Bairro Tegipio +,1934( +Schubart,1939 +) + +; + +Bairro Várzea +, 1934 ( +Schubart, 1939 +) + +; + +Olinda +[- +08.0089°S +; - +34.8553°W +], banana plantation, + +07.iv.1935 + +( +Schubart,1939 +) + +; + +Iguarassú +[- +07.8333°S +; - +34.9000°W +], +Ilha Itamaracá +[- +07.754660°S +; - +34.837309°W +], + +25.v.1935 + +( +Schubart,1939 +) + +; + +São LourenÇo da Mata +, + +14.vii.1937 + +,( +Schubar +, 1939) + +; + + +Alagoas +: + +Jequiá da Praia +[- +09.7811°S +; - +36.0936°W +], +Lagoa de Jequiá +, +Porta da Boca +, + +10.vii.1936 + +, +♀ +1 immature +( +Schubart, 1939 +) + +; + + +Goiás +: + +AragarÇas +[- +15.912823°S +; - +52.251231°W +], + +x.1953 + +, +H. Sick +coll., +♂ +( +Schubart, 1958a +) + +; + + +Rio de Janeiro +: + +Rio de Janeiro +, +Bairro Cachambí +[- +22.902038°S +; - +43.273901°W +] ( +Schubart, 1945b +) + +; + +Bairro Deodoro +[- +22.857562°S +; - +43.384850°W +] ( +Schubart, 1945b +) + +; + +Bairro do Encantado +[- +22.896400°S +; - +43.302050°W +] ( +Schubart, 1945b +) + +; + +Bairro Jacarepaguá +[- +22.971732°S +; - +43.391675°W +] ( +Schubart, 1945b +) + +; + +Lagoa Rodrigo de Freitas +[- +22.973385°S +; - +43.207108°W +] ( +Schubart, 1945b +) + +; + +Bairro do Leblon +[- +22.984645°S +; - +43.223162°W +] ( +Schubart, 1945b +) + +; + +Morro dos Dois Irmãos +[- +22.952544°S +;- +43.399345°W +] ( +Schubart, 1945b +) + +; + +Serra de Bangú +[- +22.876050°S +; - +43.468651°W +] ( +Schubart, 1945b +) + +; + +Bairro Tijuca +[- +22.935505°S +; - +43.243112°W +] ( +Schubart, 1945b +) + +; + +São GonÇalo +, +Engenho Novo +[- +22.903896°S +; - +43.268490°W +] ( +Schubart, 1945b +) + +; + + +São Paulo +: + +Pirassununga +[- +22.067267°S +; - +47.395011°W +], + +17.i.1940 + +, +♂ +♀ +1 immature +( +Schubart, 1944 +) + +; + + +03.iv.1940 + +, +9♂ +6♀ +( +Schubart, 1944 +) + +; +22.v.1940 +, +8♂ +3♀ +1 immature +( +Schubart, 1944 +); +23.vii.1940 +, +3♂ +7♀ +12 immatures +( +Schubart, 1944 +); +13.ii.1941 +, +4♂ +2♀ +( +Schubart, 1944 +); +02.iii.1940 +, +3♂ +2♀ +10 immatures +( +Schubart, 1944 +); +26.ix.1941 +, +7♂ +4♀ +2 immatures +( +Schubart, 1944 +); +12.iii.1940 +( +Schubart, 1944 +); +27.ii.1940 +, A. Aguirre coll., +11♂ +11♀ +14 immatures +( +Schubart, 1944 +); + +Fazenda Pedra Branca +, + +11.i.1942 + +, +J. Gaspar +coll., +♀ +2 immatures +( +Schubart, 1944 +) + +; + +Fazenda São Domingos +, + +22.ix.1940 + +, +20♂ +14♀ +( +Schubart, 1944 +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/03/FF/3703FFB94A894741A6E31EDF645B5C77.xml b/data/37/03/FF/3703FFB94A894741A6E31EDF645B5C77.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d51f0a1b014 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/03/FF/3703FFB94A894741A6E31EDF645B5C77.xml @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part C) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +370 +473 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Campanula latifolia +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +1 + +: 165. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Angliae, Sueciae montosis, sepibus." RCN: 1307. + + + + +Lectotype +(Haridasan & Mukherjee in Hajra & Sanjappa in +Fasc. Fl. India +22: 47. 1996): Herb. Linn. No. 221.29 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Generitype +of + +Campanula +Linnaeus + +(vide Hitchcock, +Prop. Brit. Bot. +: 131. 1929). + + + + +Current name: + + +Campanula latifolia + +L. + +( +Campanulaceae +). + + + + +Note: +As there is only a single sheet in LINN annotated as + +C +. +latifolia + +, the choice by Haridasan & Mukherjee is accepted here. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/04/10/3704107EC528C4F42D4665EC0958FB20.xml b/data/37/04/10/3704107EC528C4F42D4665EC0958FB20.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c336fbba367 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/04/10/3704107EC528C4F42D4665EC0958FB20.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Ichneumon stramentor Rasnitsyn, 1981 + + + + +stramentarius +misident. + + + +Distribution +England, Wales + + +Notes + +Added by +Hilpert (1992) +Perkins's ( +Perkins 1960 +) stramentarius is properly called stramentor, the name stramentarius actually being a senior synonym of Perkins's septentrionalis (with the latter name valid as a subspecies). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/04/39/3704399F8E090615B7782EE3B61C25D4.xml b/data/37/04/39/3704399F8E090615B7782EE3B61C25D4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c6af00ee011 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/04/39/3704399F8E090615B7782EE3B61C25D4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ + + + +Seventeen new genera of microgastrine parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) from tropical areas of the world + + + +Author + +Fernandez-Triana, Jose L +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0425-0309 +Canadian National Collection of insects, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K 1 A 0 C 6, Canada +cnc.braconidae@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Boudreault, Caroline +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-2626 +Canadian National Collection of insects, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K 1 A 0 C 6, Canada + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2018 + +2018-06-25 + + +64 + + +25 +140 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.64.25453 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.64.25453 +1314-2607-64-25 +A27707E3673148319A0BAAB6C2CD1412 +FFB89E571131B424FFEA6468C760FFF4 +1303466 + + + + +Gilbertnixonius biem Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault +sp. n. + + + + +Fig. 13 + + + +Holotype. +Female, Thailand, QSBG. + + +Holotype labels. + +THAILAND: Suphanburi/Pu Toei Nat. Park/Huai-Tapern, by waterfall/ +14°58.934'N +, +99°19.31'E +/Malaise trap, 14-21.2009/P. Wangkum, #3834. Second label: +Philoplitis +/sp. jft 1. Third label: DNA Voucher/CNCHYM/01950. + + + +Holotype locality. + +THAILAND: Suphanburi, Pu Toei National Park, Huai-Tapern, by waterfall, +4°58.934'N +, +99°19.31'E +. + + + +Diagnosis. +This is the only known species in the genus so far, thus the generic diagnosis works as the species diagnosis as well. + + +Description. + +Female. Body mostly dark brown; palpi, scape, pedicel, most of first two pairs of legs, metacoxa, metafemur, first few laterotergites and sternites white or yellow-white; antenna with a subtle banded pattern, with first 10 flagellomeres yellow to light brown, and apical flagellomeres brown; wings hyaline, with most veins light brown, pterostigma mostly white-yellow (except for posterior 0.3 which is light brown). Head with relatively large tentorial pits (which reach well into mesopleuron). Occipital carina defined laterally (not clear in specimen if also defined dorsally). Epicnemial carina partially defined. Meso- and metapleura strongly sculptured, mostly by transverse striation. Anteromesoscutum and scutellar disc mostly sculptured with strong punctures. Scutellar disc with sharp carina around margins and slightly protruding posteriorly. Scutellar disc with rugose band of sculptured postero-medially. Propodeum with median longitudinal and transverse carinae strongly defined. Fore wing with relatively small, quadrangular areolet. Hind wing with vannal lobe entirely setose. Metacoxa relatively short, not surpassing posterior margin of T2. Metatibia spines relatively short (around 0.3 +x +length of first segment of metatarsus). T1 with median sulcus on anterior half, posterior half relatively strongly sculptured. T2 sub-quadrate, with longitudinal striae. Hypopygium relatively short, not extending beyond last tergites. Ovipositor very short, ovipositor sheaths with very few and sparse setae near apex. + + + +Body measurements (mm). +F2 L: 0.20; F3 L: 0.19; F14 L: 0.10; F15 L: 0.10; Malar sulcus L: 0.09; Mandible W: 0.08; T1 L: 0.32; T1 W at posterior margin: 0.12; T1 maximum W: 0.16; T2 W at anterior margin: 0.13; T2 W at posterior margin: 0.17; T2 L: 0.12; Metafemur L: 0.59; Metafemur W: 0.18; Metatibia L: 0.79; Inner spur L: 0.11; Outer spur L: 0.09; First segment of Metatarsus L: 0.32; Ovipositor sheaths L: 0.14; Body L: 2.13; Fore wing L: 2.14. + +Male. +Unknown. + + + + +Biology +. + +Host unknown. + + +Distribution. +Thailand. + + +Molecular data. + +The DNA barcode of the holotype specimen (BIN BOLD:AAZ9883) is very unique, 13.2% different from the closest +Microgastrinae +sequence in BOLD. + + + +Etymology. + +Named after the Natural History Museum in London (United Kingdom) in recognition of the outstanding and important collection of 34+ million insect specimens that institution holds, including one of the largest and most complete +Microgastrinae +collection in the world. The old acronym of the Natural History Museum (British Museum until 1992) was commonly referred to as +"BM" +at the time, which is pronounced in English as +"Bee-Em" +, approximately the same as the pronunciation in Latin of the species name " +Gilbertnixonius biem +" would be. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/04/5C/37045C5BAE4DFEF97FCF150CFD574F74.xml b/data/37/04/5C/37045C5BAE4DFEF97FCF150CFD574F74.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..98f9366a971 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/04/5C/37045C5BAE4DFEF97FCF150CFD574F74.xml @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ + + + +First record of the genera Diaparsis Foerster and Phradis Foerster (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Tersilochinae) from Mexico + + + +Author + +Khalaim, Andrey I. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1802-2649 +Facultad de Ingenieria y Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas, Cd. Victoria, Mexico & Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia +ptera@mail.ru + + + +Author + +Ruiz-Cancino, Enrique +Facultad de Ingenieria y Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas, Cd. Victoria, Mexico + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2018 + +2018-04-30 + + +63 + + +61 +72 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.63.24491 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.63.24491 +1314-2607-63-61 +4E4279AECA0644D9B6AE867EBB911B47 +FFEE1E4E730D6D2AFB67B372BC54FFCF +1243351 + + + + + + +Phradis nanacamilpus Khalaim & +Ruiz-Cancino + +sp. n. + + + + +Figs 14-21 + + + +Comparison. + +In the key to the Nearctic species of + +Phradis + +( +Horstmann 2013b +), + +P. nanacamilpus + +runs to couplet 10 but does not correspond with either side of the couplet as it has the mesopleuron very finely and sparsely punctate on a smooth background centrally, shallowly granulate peripherally (Fig. +19 +), dorsolateral area of propodeum without irregular wrinkles (Figs +18 +, +20 +), and ovipositor sheath 1.4 times as long as first tergite. + + + +Description. + +Female +. Body length 3.8 mm. Fore wing length almost 2.5 mm. + + +Head, in dorsal view, almost 1.7 times as broad as long, weakly constricted and weakly rounded posterior to eyes (Fig. +17 +); temple 0.7 times as long as eye width (Fig. +17 +). Eyes with short and rather dense setae. Clypeus (Fig. +16 +) lenticular in anterior view, 3.5 times as broad as long, almost flat in lateral view, smooth, separated from face by sharp furrow, with a few fine punctures next to upper and lower margins. Mandible weakly tapered at base, with upper and lower margins subparallel in apical 0.8; upper tooth distinctly longer than the lower. Malar space slightly shorter than basal mandibular width. Antennal flagellum (Fig. +15 +) with 14 flagellomeres, basally very slender; second and third flagellomere 3.0-3.5 times and subapical flagellomeres 1.4-1.6 times as long as broad. Face with weak median prominence in upper part. Face with very fine inconspicuous punctures (medial prominence impunctate), smooth between punctures and shining centrally, and very finely granulate and weakly shining laterally. Frons smooth and very fine punctate, laterally (next to eye orbits) very finely +granulate +and dull. Vertex and temple with very fine punctures on smooth and shining background. Occipital carina complete, flattened mediodorsally. + + +Mesosoma predominantly finely granulate, impunctate, dull; mesoscutum evenly finely punctate smooth and shining background; mesopleuron centrally more or less smooth and shining, with fine and sparse punctures, peripherally shallowly granulate and weakly shining to dull. Notaulus as a rather strong wrinkle on anterolateral side of mesoscutum. Scutellum with lateral longitudinal carinae at extreme base. Foveate groove weak and narrow, situated in centre of mesopleuron, slightly oblique, with fine and short transverse wrinkles (Fig. +19 +). Propodeal spiracle small, separated from pleural carina by about 4.0 times diameter of spiracle. Propodeum with basal area weakly widened anteriorly, twice broader anteriorly than posteriorly and almost 0.4 times as long as apical area (Fig. +20 +); basal longitudinal carinae weak but distinct. Apical area impressed along midline, rounded anteriorly (Fig. +20 +); apical longitudinal carinae distinct, reaching transverse carina anteriorly. + + +Fore and hind wing venation very similar to that in + +P. bufalosus + +. Fore wing with second recurrent vein (2m-cu) interstitial. Intercubitus (2rs-m) long. First abscissa of radius (Rs+2r) slightly arcuate, longer than width of pterostigma. First and second abscissae of radius (Rs+2r and Rs) meeting at slightly acute angle (less than 90°). Metacarpus (R1) short, not reaching apex of fore wing. Second abscissa of postnervulus incomplete, partly enclosing brachial cell posteriorly. Hind wing with nervellus (cu1&cu-a) weakly reclivous. + +Legs slender. Hind femur 4.8 times as long as broad and 0.85 times as long as tibia. Tarsal claws not pectinate. + +First tergite slender, almost 5.0 times as long as posteriorly broad, smooth, with very weak striae ventrolaterally; tergite round in cross-section centrally, with lateral sides subparallel and petiole not separated from postpetiole in dorsal view. Glymma absent. Second tergite 3.6 times as long as anteriorly broad. Thyridial depression very long and narrow, pointed posteriorly, extending in basal 0.4 of tergite. Ovipositor slender, weakly and nearly evenly bent upwards over its total length, evenly tapered apically, with weak but distinct dorsal subapical notch (Fig. +21 +); sheath 1.4 times as long as first tergite. + + +Head, mesosoma and first metasomal segment black. Palpi, mandible (teeth dark reddish brown) and tegula brownish yellow. Lower 0.7 of clypeus yellow-brown. Antenna brownish yellow basally to brownish black apically (Fig. +15 +). Pterostigma brown. Leg brownish yellow; mid and hind coxae darkened with brown; hind femur brown except base and apex. Metasoma posterior to first tergite dark brown. + + +Male +. Unknown. + + + +Figures 14-21. + +Phradis nanacamilpus + +sp. n., holotype female. +14 +habitus (without wings), lateral view +15 +antenna, lateral view +16 +head, front view +17 +head, dorsal view +18 +head, mesosoma and base of metasoma, lateral view +19 +mesopleuron, postero-lateral view +20 +propodeum, dorsal view +21 +apex of metasoma with ovipositor, lateral view. + + + + +Etymology. +The species is named after the type locality, Nanacamilpa. + + +Material examined. + + +Holotype +female (UNAM), +Mexico +, +Tlaxcala +, +Nanacamilpa +, + +Ejido Los +Bufalos + +, +N19°28' +, +W98°35' +, bosque +Pino-Encino +, + +2830-2900 m + +, +Malaise trap +, +3-30 June 2016 +, coll. +Y. Marquez +& +A. Contreras. + + + + +Distribution. +Central Mexico (Tlaxcala). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/04/61/370461BB262D57A2BF0FD32F2C5B536A.xml b/data/37/04/61/370461BB262D57A2BF0FD32F2C5B536A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6ca777da103 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/04/61/370461BB262D57A2BF0FD32F2C5B536A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,487 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Violaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/violaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Viola tricolor +L. subsp. +tricolor + + + + + + +Gewoehnliches +Feld-Stiefmuetterchen + + + + + +Unterart ISFS: 452501 Checklist: 1050345 +Violaceae +Viola +Viola tricolor +aggr. +Viola tricolor L. +Viola tricolor L. subsp. tricolor + + +Zusammenfassung + + + + +Artbeschreibung + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: 10-40(-90) cm hoch, unten meist verzweigt. +Nebenblaetter +abstehend, ihr Endabschnitt meist ganzrandig, den +Laubblaettern +nicht +aehnlich +. +Blueten +violett, blau, gelb oder gescheckt. + +Unterstes Kronblatt mit dem Sporn +12-25 mm +lang, bis 2mal so lang wie die +Kelchblaetter + +. Sporn +3-5 mm +lang, nur wenig +laenger +als die +Kelchblattanhaengsel +. + + + + +Bluetezeit + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: 3-9 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: Wiesen, Brachfelder / (kollin-)montan-subalpin / CH + + + + +Verbreitung global + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: Eurasiatisch + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte + +(nach +Landolt & al. 2010 +) + +323-443.k-t.2n=26 + + + +Status + + + +Status IUCN +: Nicht +gefaehrdet + + + + +Nationale +Prioritaet +: -- + + +Internationale Verantwortung +: -- + + + +Oekologie + + + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + +KEINE ANGABE + + +
+
+ + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl L--Salzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl T--
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +--
+ + + + +Nomenklatur + + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Viola tricolor +L. subsp. +tricolor + + + + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: + +Gewoehnliches +Feld-Stiefmuetterchen + +Nom +francais +: + +Pensee +tricolore + + + + +Nome italiano: -- + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Viola tricolor L. subsp. tricolor + + +Checklist 2017 + +452501
= +Viola tricolor L. subsp. tricolor + + +Flora Helvetica 2018 + +733
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Kommentare aus der +Checklist 2017 +Neue Unterart: Die Art wurde bisher (SISF-2) nicht in Unterarten aufgeteilt oder die Unterteilung wurde bisher nicht akzeptiert. Checklist + + + + +Status Indigenat +: Indigen + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein + + +Status Rote Liste national 2016 + + +Status IUCN +: Nicht +gefaehrdet + + + +Zusaetzliche +Informationen + +Kriterien IUCN: -- + + +Status Rote Liste regional 2019 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Biogeografische RegionenStatusKriterien IUCN
Jura (JU) +nicht +gefaehrdet +(Least Concern) +
Mittelland (MP) +nicht +gefaehrdet +(Least Concern) +
Alpennordflanke (NA) +nicht +gefaehrdet +(Least Concern) +
+Alpensuedflanke +(SA) + +nicht +gefaehrdet +(Least Concern) +
+Oestliche +Zentralalpen (EA) + +nicht +gefaehrdet +(Least Concern) +
Westliche Zentralalpen (WA) +nicht +gefaehrdet +(Least Concern) +
+ + + +Status nationale +Prioritaet +/Verantwortung + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ +Nationale +Prioritaet + +--
+Massnahmenbedarf +--
+ +Internationale Verantwortung + +--
+ +Ueberwachung +Bestaende + +--
+ +Schutzstatus + + + + + + +
Kein internationaler, nationaler oder kantonaler Schutz
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/04/8A/37048A4D93B0CFBCDE9AB321B882171F.xml b/data/37/04/8A/37048A4D93B0CFBCDE9AB321B882171F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8b2ba1a8a42 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/04/8A/37048A4D93B0CFBCDE9AB321B882171F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ + + + +Nomenclatural review of Acalypha (Euphorbiaceae) of the Western Indian Ocean Region (Madagascar, the Comoros Archipelago, the Mascarene Islands and the Seychelles Archipelago) + + + +Author + +Munoz, Iris Montero + + + +Author + +Cardiel, Jose Maria + + + +Author + +Levin, Geoffrey A. + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2018 + +108 + + +85 +116 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.108.27284 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.108.27284 +1314-2003-108-85 +FFBBFFAB9720FF8D7D4CFFB9FFF1FFC8 +1420642 + + + + +3. +Acalypha burmanii I.Montero & Cardiel. +nom. nov. + + + + +Tragia filiformis +Poir., Encycl. 7: 727. 1806. +Acalypha acuminata +Vahl ex. Baill. Adansonia 1: 267. 1861 +nom. illeg +., non. +A. acuminata +Benth. (1854). + + + +Type. + +Madagascar?: s.l., s.d., +Herb. de Lamarck. s.n. +(holotype: P-LAM [P00367371]!). + + + +Distribution. +Madagascar (Antsiranana). + + +References. + + +Mueller +Argoviensis (1865 + +: 40) as + +A. spiciflora + +Burm.f.; + +Mueller +Argoviensis (1866 + +: 867) as + +A. spiciflora + +; +Baillon (1891 +: tab. 188) as + +A. acuminata + +Vahl. ex Baill.; +Baillon (1892 +: 1004) as + +A. acuminata + +; +Heckel (1903 +: 198) as + +A. acuminata + +; + +Palacky +(1907 + +: 24) as + +A. acuminata + +; +Pax and Hoffmann (1924 +: 137) as + +A. spiciflora + +; +Leandri (1942 +: 269) as + +A. spiciflora + +. + + + +Notes. + + +Acalypha burmanii + +is proposed as a new name for + +Tragia filiformis + +Poir. We cannot combine + +T. filiformis + +under + +Acalypha + +because it is blocked by + +A. filiformis + +Poir., nor can we use the illegitimate name + +A. acuminata + +Baill. See also comments under the excluded species + +A. spiciflora + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/04/E4/3704E4B9D4A054DCAFD05DAC4673F49C.xml b/data/37/04/E4/3704E4B9D4A054DCAFD05DAC4673F49C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..401d0905255 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/04/E4/3704E4B9D4A054DCAFD05DAC4673F49C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,514 @@ + + + +Painted black: Iguana melanoderma (Reptilia, Squamata, Iguanidae) a new melanistic endemic species from Saba and Montserrat islands (Lesser Antilles) + + + +Author + +Breuil, Michel +Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Laboratoire des Reptiles et Amphibiens, Batiment 30, 57, rue Cuvier, CP n ° 30, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France + + + +Author + +Schikorski, David +Laboratoire Labofarm-Genindexe, 4 rue Theodore Botrel, 22600 Loudeac, France + + + +Author + +Vuillaume, Barbara +Laboratoire Labofarm-Genindexe, 4 rue Theodore Botrel, 22600 Loudeac, France + + + +Author + +Krauss, Ulrike +Maison du Soleil, Dauphin Road, La Borne, P O Box GM 1109, Saint Lucia + + + +Author + +Morton, Matthew N. +Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Les Augres Manor, Trinity, Jersey JE 3 5 BP, UK + + + +Author + +Corry, Elizabeth +Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Les Augres Manor, Trinity, Jersey JE 3 5 BP, UK + + + +Author + +Bech, Nicolas +Laboratoire Ecologie et Biologie des Interactions, equipe EES, UMR CNRS 6556, Universite de Poitiers, 5 rue Albert Turpin, 86073 Poitiers Cedex 9, France + + + +Author + +Jelic, Misel +Entomological Department, Varazdin City Museum, Setaliste Josipa Jurja Strossmayera 3, 42000 Varazdin, Croatia + + + +Author + +Grandjean, Frederic +Laboratoire Ecologie et Biologie des Interactions, equipe EES, UMR CNRS 6556, Universite de Poitiers, 5 rue Albert Turpin, 86073 Poitiers Cedex 9, France +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8494-0985 +frederic.grandjean@univ-poitiers.fr + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +926 + + +95 +131 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.926.48679 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.926.48679 +1313-2970-926-95 +E6D165DE8C614CE1A75A56BE68389379 +9009F9B7DD7659958B6AF0D9278CCEA2 + + + + +Iguana melanoderma +sp. nov. +Figures 5 +, 6 +, 7 + + + +Diagnosis. + +A species of + +Iguana + +, with a distinctive melanistic phenotype, with a black dewlap, huge tubercular nape scales, the absence of horns on the snout. + + + +Etymology. + +The name was chosen to emphasize the most conspicuous feature of this new taxon, from +melano +meaning black and +derma +meaning skin. + + +Common local names are: Melanistic Lesser Antilles +iguana +, Saban Black +iguana + + + +Type material. + +Choice of the holotype and the paratype. +The choice of our type specimens and the way we conducted the description of the type and the paratype attempt to best meet the criteria proposed by ( +Dubois 2009 +) for the case of + +Conolophus marthae + +described by +Gentile and Snell (2009) +. We took into account the same kind of problems of sacrificing a specimen for museum collection and referencing an emblematic, iconic, large lizard that belongs to an endangered taxon. + + +(1) The Saba and Montserrat populations survived for a long time in a period when the risk of extinction was lower than today. Nevertheless, the iguanas were hunted for food, killed by cats and dogs, and their habitats destroyed by livestock and natural events. Today, in Saba, the main risk for this small endemic population, which seems to be far from the carrying capacity of the island, is the arrival of invasive common iguanas from South and Central America that have a rapidly expanding population in Saint Maarten. In Montserrat, the same risk exists. Volcanic eruptions are also a major threat to these populations, as evidenced by the eruption of the +Soufriere +Hills in Montserrat in 1995 and the following years, which destroyed about a third of the island. + + +Hybridization with closely related lineages may in-fact be the greatest risk and could very likely lead to extinction of endemic lineages, as is the case for + +Iguana delicatissima + +in Guadeloupian Archipelago ( +Vuillaume et al. 2015 +). Moreover, the description of a new taxon may attract collectors and lead to unintended and undesirable consequences. This is of concern because on the Dutch island of Saint Maarten, both the legal and illegal pet trades are common. With the description of this new taxon, local authorities, such as the +Saba Conservation Foundation +and the NGO +Sea and Learn +, will have tools to protect the Saban Black +Iguana +from poaching on an island where the terrestrial protected area is less than 0.5 sq. km on the edge of this endemic +iguana +'s range. + + +(2) +Lazell (1973) +studied and collected iguanas in Saba and Montserrat in the 1960s. The vouchers are deposited at the Museum of Comparative Zoology (Harvard) with two other individuals collected in the seventies. Six vouchers for these two islands (Saba: MCZ R-75832, R-75833, R 133096; Montserrat: MCZ: R-61119, R-82310, R-126377) are present but unfortunately it is almost impossible to measure them properly due to their poor condition. In addition, some are young individuals, which do not have well developed diagnostic characteristics. + + +(3) We have no precise idea of the size of the +iguana +population in Saba and Montserrat. Rough estimates based on density in some surveyed areas yield 100-300 adults and subadults for each island. In theory, it is always possible to catch a senile non-breeding male and prepare it in good conditions act as a voucher that will be available in a Museum collection for future study. But, for technical reasons, when the first author was in Saba in 2012, it was not possible to collect such an individual. Roadkill animals are often in poor conditions (broken, flattened, rotten) and in most cases cannot be studied and preserved in a zoological reference collection. The same remarks apply to the Montserrat population. + + +(4) Since diagnostic characteristics are mainly visible in adult individuals and are not measurements, we chose for the holotype of this new taxon specimen MCZ R-75032 from Saba collected by JD Lazell 6/23/63 on the Windward side of Saba. The paratype MCZ R-126377 is a head of an adult from Montserrat collected by JO Boos at Old Road Bluff 8/6/1970. These two samples are housed at the Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ, Harvard). They present the diagnostic characters as described by ( +Breuil 2013 +, +2016 +) and represent the populations of the two islands, respectively. + + + +Holotype + +(Fig. +5 +). Lesser Antilles, Saba• ♀; Windward side; 23 June 1963; JD Lazell [leg.]; MCZ (R-75832). + +This individual from Saba was not measured in detail because of the risk of spoiling the specimen. It is an adult female of approximately 26.3 cm SVL and a tail length of approximately 66.4 cm and a total length of 92.7 cm (measurements and photographs by Joseph Martinez, MCZ, Harvard). + + +Figure 5. +Holotype of + +Iguana melanoderma + +sp. nov. +A +Dorsal view +B +lateral view +C +dorsal view of the head +D +lateral view of the head. MCZ R-75832 from Saba, Windwardside. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University. President and Fellows of Harvard College. 1. Black patch between the tympanum and the subtympanic plate. 2. High number of aligned nape tubercles. 3. No horns on the stout. 4. Dorsal carpet pattern. 5. Black on the upper part of the forelimb. 6. Prominent nostrils. 7. Anterior part of the snout, not black. 8. Subtympanic plate with a dark posterior patch. 9. Black anterior edge of lower sublabial scales. 10. Fewer than 10 triangular gular spikes extended in the upper part of the lower dewlap. 11. Entirely black dewlap. + + + + +Description of the holotype. +The subtympanic plate is round, with a dark patch in the posterior part. The anterior, upper, and lower parts of the subtympanic plate are surrounded by black pigment. Most labial and sublabial scales have dark coloration on their anterior side. The lower labial scales, before the subtympanic plate, are arranged in a series of five pairs of scales of quite similar size and located one in front of the other. The tubercular nape scales are numerous, well developed, grey, and aligned in rows. + + +Color pattern. + +This specimen is partially discolored, with a slight carpet pattern, the stripes on the tail are almost invisible in the photographs, but according to ( +Lazell 1973 +) who captured this specimen, it had a conspicuous carpet pattern. + +The dewlap is black in its lower part, and there are nine small, triangular yellowish gular spikes. The tympanum is brown. There is a conspicuous black spot between the eye and the tympanum. The snout and the top of the head are light, not black. The dorsal spikes are greenish and black. + + +Paratype + +(Fig. +6 +). Lesser Antilles, Montserrat • ♂; Old Road Bluff; 6 Aug. 1970; JO Boos [leg.]; MCZ R-126377. + + + +Figure 6. +Paratype of + +Iguana melanoderma + +sp. nov. +A +Left side view of the head +B +right side view of the head. MCZ R 126377 from Montserrat, Old Road Bluff. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University. President and Fellows of Harvard College. 1. Black patch between the tympanum and the subtympanic plate. 2. High number of aligned nape tubercles. 3. No horns on the stout. 5. Black spot on the upper forelimb. 6. Prominent nostrils. 7. Anterior part of the snout, not black. 8. Subtympanic plate with a dark posterior patch. 9. Black anterior edge of lower sublabial scales. 10. Fewer than 10 triangular gular spikes extended in the upper part of the lower part of the dewlap. 11. Dewlap entirely black. 12. Lower sublabial scales arranged in pairs of nearly the same size. + + + + +Description of the paratype. +This individual is only a head of a small adult male based on the size of the dorsal spikes. This head presents the typical characteristics of this taxon: large grey scales on the tubercular nape, black spot between the eye and the tympanum, and labial and sublabial scales with black patches on the anterior part. There are five pairs of scales before the subtympanic plate almost completely black, a black dewlap, and a flat head with a light snout (photographs by Joseph Martinez, MCZ Harvard). + + +Type locality. + +On the Windward side of Saba for the holotype and on Old Road Bluff, west coast of Montserrat for the paratype (Figs +1 +, +11 +). + + + + +Description of + +Iguana melanoderma + +. + + + +Iguana melanoderma + +is distinguished from all other +iguana +lineages by the following combination of characteristics. This description is mainly based on adult iguanas observed in the field with the most developed diagnostic characteristics. + + + +Iguana melanoderma + +belongs to the Common Green +Iguana +phenotype (in contrast to the + +Iguana delicatissima + +phenotype) with its large subtympanic plate, the arrangement of sublabial scales, the rectangular shape of the dewlap, the shape and the distribution of the gular spikes, its flat head, its tubercular nape scales, and its banded tail ( +Breuil 2013 +, +2016 +). By the absence of horns on the snout, + +Iguana melanoderma + +can be distinguished from + +Iguana rhinolopha + +and + +I. iguana insularis + +, and from + +I. iguana sanctaluciae + +(Fig. +7 +). + + +The most distinctive morphological trait of this new taxon is its general color: adults from Saba and Montserrat iguanas are melanistic. There is a tendency for individuals to become blacker with age (Fig. +8 +). + + + +Figure 7. +Comparison of morphological features of the head. +A +Young adult male. 1. Subtympanic plate with pink in the center. 2. Lower sublabial scales arranged in pairs of nearly identical size. 3. Black anterior edge of the lower sublabial scales. 4. Black border around the subtympanic plate. 5. Prominent nostrils. 6. Black spot between the eye and the tympanum. 7. Absence of horn and light snout. 8. Dark brown eye. 9. Triangular gular spikes. 10. Fewer than 10 gular spikes extended in the upper part of the lower dewlap. 11. High number of aligned nape tubercles. 12. Prominent light-grey tubercles. 13. Light greyish-green coloration on the neck. 14. High light-grey dorsal spines. 15. Dewlap half black. 16. Dorsal part of the limb with light-green scales becoming black with the extension of melanin from the anterior edge to the posterior edge of the scales. +B +Old male of + +Iguana melanoderma + +(Saba). 1. Large all-black subtympanic plate. 2. Extension of the black pigment on the sublabial scales. 3. Black coloration of the labial and upper sublabial scales. 4. Black coloration between the tympanum and the subtympanic plate. 6. Extension of the black spot around the eye and on the posterior labial and sublabial scales.7. Snout turning dark grey. 9, 10. Gular spikes turning dark grey with extension of black patches. 12. Dark grey nape tubercles. 13. Black coloration on the neck. 14. Dorsal spikes turning black. 15. Dewlap completely black. 16. Black upper face of the limb. + + + + +Figure 8. +The dorsal carpet pattern of young adults + +Iguana melanoderma + +. +A +Montserrat +B +Saba. The dorsal coloration is formed by darker more or less interrupted dorso-ventral bands (brown, dark grey) on a lighter ground. This pattern disappears in old individuals. The black patch between the eye and the tympanum is already visible. + + +There is always a black spot between the brown to grey-brown eye and the tympanum. In fully grown adults, the subtympanic plate is 2 to 2.5 times the height of the tympanum. Its color varies from light pink to dark pink with a proportion of black coloration ranging from hardly black to all black. The tympanum can be completely black. The labial and sublabial scales have the same coloring as the subtympanic plate. The lower labial scales, anterior to the subtympanic plate, are arranged in 3-5 pairs of scales of fairly similar size, one in front of the other, and do not form a mosaic of small scales. The head is usually black on the sides (tympanum, eye, subtympanic and posterior labial and sublabial parts), whereas the snout and the top of the head are light to dark grey, and in some individuals these parts are nearly entirely black. + +The dewlap is completely black in adults, as in + +Iguana iguana sanctaluciae + +(Fig. +7 +). The gular spikes are light to dark grey with a variable portion of black. They are flat, triangular, quite small, and not exceed 10 in number. A variable percentage of the gular scales on the lower part of the dewlap are pentagonal or hexagonal, and do not overlap. + +The dorsal parts of the limbs are more or less black, and the black is more developed in older individuals extending over the ventral face of the limb. Some specimens have entirely black head and legs whereas the body is dark green. This body coloration is the result of a black anterior part and a lighter posterior part of most scales while some others are black or dark green. The spikes of the dorsal crest range from light to dark grey; the central part can be black. Some individuals have entirely black dorsal and caudal crests. + +The nuptial coloration is present in both sexes, but more vivid and more developed in males than in females. Breeding adults sometimes become reddish-orange over the entire body ( +Powell et al. 2005 +) and the jowls are pinkish if not too melanistic. They never become as orange as + +I. rhinolopha + +. According to +Lazell (1973) +, in melanistic individuals, the face, snout, and sometimes the sides are usually purple or brown. + + +The iguanas from Saba and Montserrat begin their lives with discontinuous light, medium and dark green dorsolateral bands and patches, some of which are underlined by white markings without black on the head and limbs. The black spot between the eye and the tympanum is present in one-year-old individuals, but it is very small and poorly developed. The proportion of the areas covered by these different green markings varies in hatchlings. In juveniles and subadults, this pattern then gradually changes to an ornate arrangement, called a carpet pattern by +Lazell (1973) +which consists of interrupted bands and patches, green and brown or grey and green, according to the skin shade (Fig. +9 +). This highly disruptive carpet pattern may be the mark of an ancient adaptation to crypsis. A light carpet pattern, with brown and green, is also sometimes present in adults. With age, the individuals become darker, causing the carpet pattern to fade. The granular scales on the body are green, but at their periphery they are black, and a varying proportion of these scales are completely black. The details and chronology of these ontogenetic transformations are unknown. + + + +Figure 9. +A +Old adult from Montserrat +B +old adult from Saba. In these old individuals the carpet pattern is absent. The head is almost entirely black, except for the top and the snout. The dewlap, neck, dorsal spikes, and forelimb are black. Dorsal and lateral coloring is more variable, ranging from entirely black to a mosaic of black, brown, and dark green scales. + + +There are no nasal horns. The tubercular nape scales are numerous, prominent, ranging from light to dark grey, and are often aligned in many rows. The cheek scales usually do not overlap. +Montserrat iguanas are similar to those of Saba. Overall, they appear less melanistic, but some individuals are as black as those of Saba. The head appears to be flatter and more elongated in Montserrat than in Saba, but more data are needed to assess putative morphological divergence between the two populations. + + +Biology. + +In Saba, + +Iguana melanoderma + +lives on cliffs (Fig. +10 +), in trees and bushes, in shrublands, and deciduous woodlands. One of the most striking facts about Saba is that these iguanas live in a foggy and cool environment up to about 500 m a.s.l. They sunbathe as soon as the sun rises (Figs +10 +, +11 +). The black coloration may be an adaptative trait to help rapidly raise their body temperature in these cool conditions ( +Breuil 2013 +, +2016 +). Hatchlings were observed in June and July. + + +In Montserrat, + +Iguana melanoderma + +have been reported in a variety of habitats, mostly in coastal residential areas. In 1995, before the eruption of the +Soufriere +Hills, iguanas could be seen in the then capital, Plymouth, along the seawall defenses just above high tide (M. Morton, personal observation). +Blankenship (1990) +reported a preference for ghauts (streams), and the majority of records to date are from locations near ghauts or rivers (J. Dawson, SL Adams, pers. comm., E. Corry, pers. obs.). + + + +Figure 10. + +Iguana melanoderma + +sunbathing at dawn on the Windward coast of Saba. + + + + +Figure 11. +A basking + +Iguana melanoderma + +optimizing after different trials its warming by a curved position when the sun is low on the horizon on the Windward coast of Saba. + + + +In Montserrat, there are far fewer records from mesic forest ( +Hamilton et al. 2008 +) from the Centre. The highest elevation for +iguana +sightings has been cited as ca. 400 m a.s.l. (G. Garcia pers. comm). However, this may reflect a bias towards areas where people spend the most time. Fewer people visit the forests, and far fewer people travel to the east of the island after the eruption. That being said, +Daltry (1995) +reported a negative association between +iguana +sightings and the elevation of the study plot (P <0.0023). + + +According to +Blankenship (1990) +, Montserrat iguanas breed from late February, when nest digging begins, until the emergence of hatchlings in July and August. Clutch sizes range from 15 to 30 ( +Blankenship 1990 +). Observations after 1995, i.e., after the start of the last eruptions cycle of the +Soufriere +Hills, indicate that nesting has continued at these times of the year; egg-laying was recorded in March and April (E. Corry, M. Morton, personal observations). In April 2008, one female was observed nesting in sand at Iles Bay, an area of recent lahar deposits at the mouth of the Belham River, as well as higher up in this now subterranean stream (E. Corry; M. Morton, personal observations). This is consistent with +Blankenship (1990) +, who stated that they nest in loose soil. + + + +Distribution. + +The volcanic island of Montserrat is 102 km2. In 1995, the dormant volcano of the +Soufriere +Hills became active. Catastrophic eruptions in 1997 rendered two thirds of the south of the island uninhabitable and led to the creation of an exclusion zone (Fig. +12A +). There are three major mountain ranges with natural vegetation restricted to small areas on the tops of two. The highest point before the eruption was Chances Peak, which reached 914 m a.s.l. The subsequent lava dome naturally rises and falls periodically; its maximum height was 1050 m a.s.l. in 2015. According to +Lazell (1973) +, in the 1960s, iguanas were locally abundant in southern Montserrat and were present throughout the lowlands of the island. +Steadman et al. (1984) +reported that the species occurs in scattered areas around the island, and is locally common in some places along the southern coast. According to +Reitz (1994) +, the +iguana +was not common on the island. + + + +Figure 12. +Distribution of + +Iguana melanoderma + +in Montserrat and Saba. Each square is 2 km along a side. + + + +The island of Saba is about 13 km2 and rises to an altitude of 877 m a.s.l. on Mt Scenery. This peak forms the summit of a dormant 400 ka-year-old volcano ( +Roobol and Smith 2004 +). Saba is surrounded by steep cliffs on all sides. There is no permanent beach for the laying of +iguana +eggs as in Martinique around Mt +Pelee +. Much of the central highlands of the island, above 400-500 m, are covered with dense primary and secondary rainforests. Rain and moisture from the surrounding clouds bring humidity to the forest. This pristine habitat thus seems to be incompatible for a permanent presence with the thermal and solar needs of iguanas, even in the canopy where clouds and mist are often present. + + +The superposition of the geological map ( +Roobol and Smith 2004 +) and the current vegetation shows that the rainforest is developing on the andesite lava of the recent central volcano. On the pelean volcanic domes on the periphery of Mount Scenery, patches of xeric vegetation are found, as on Lower and Upper +Hell's +Gate, Level, and Great Hill. Some hills, such as Old Booby, have little tree vegetation; overgrazing by goats is responsible for this. Some of the cliffs are made of volcanic tuff which is a poorly consolidated material that cannot withstand heavy tropical rains and where trees cannot grow. The vegetation and the climatic conditions, temperature and sun, therefore seem to restrict the distribution of iguanas and thus their numbers. + + +As such, the Saban Black +Iguana +is mainly present on the Windward side, from sea level to about 500 m a.s.l. (hilltop at the Level 514 m) (Fig. +12B +). The main concentration is found on the slopes of Lower and Upper +Hell's +Gate, and on the cliffs of Booby Hill. The total range of this taxon is about 5-6 km2. There are also some iguanas at The Bottom. This locality is located west of Windwardside village, but not in the shadow of Mt Scenery. For +Lazell (1973) +, in the 1960s, Saba iguanas were common everywhere, even at 800 m a.s.l. in the rainforest of Mt Scenery. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/05/43/370543CB6AC36680625702E2B2E8BEA9.xml b/data/37/05/43/370543CB6AC36680625702E2B2E8BEA9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4270a5ca61a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/05/43/370543CB6AC36680625702E2B2E8BEA9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ + + + +A regional study of the genus Phyllopsora (Ramalinaceae) in Asia and Melanesia + + + +Author + +Kistenich, Sonja + + + +Author + +Bendiksby, Mika + + + +Author + +Vairappan, Charles S. + + + +Author + +Weerakoon, Gothamie + + + +Author + +Wijesundara, Siril + + + +Author + +Wolseley, Patricia A. + + + +Author + +Timdal, Einar + +text + + +MycoKeys + + +2019 + +53 + + +23 +72 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.53.33425 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.53.33425 +1314-4049-53-23 + + + + + +Phyllopsora cinchonarum ( +Fee +) Timdal + + + + +Description. + +Brako (1989 +, as +Squamacidia janeirensis +), +Timdal (2008b) +, +Elix (2009 +, as +Triclinum cinchonarum +). + + + +Distribution. + +Central and South America ( +Brako 1989 +; +Timdal 2008b +), Asia, Australia ( +Elix 2009 +). + + + +Remarks. + +The species is recognized by the squamulose thallus on a white prothallus, long isidia, and the presence of lobaric acid (Fig. 3C). Several additional compounds are reported, for example atranorin, fumarprotocetraric acid, and a scarlet pigment. In our Asian material, we have encountered only lobaric acid (always major), atranorin (minor to absent), and some unknown compounds (minor to absent). It is the phylogenetic sister to the Neotropical +P. concinna +(Fig. 1). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/05/99/370599D6644A3D9808F03D85B82E0192.xml b/data/37/05/99/370599D6644A3D9808F03D85B82E0192.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a583d0e65cb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/05/99/370599D6644A3D9808F03D85B82E0192.xml @@ -0,0 +1,194 @@ + + + +Review of Apantelessensu stricto (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) from Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, northwestern Costa Rica, with keys to all described species from Mesoamerica + + + +Author + +Fernandez-Triana, Jose L. + + + +Author + +Whitfield, James B. + + + +Author + +Rodriguez, Josephine J. + + + +Author + +Smith, M. Alex + + + +Author + +Janzen, Daniel H. + + + +Author + +Hallwachs, Winnie D. + + + +Author + +Hajibabaei, Mehrdad + + + +Author + +Burns, John M. + + + +Author + +Solis, M. Alma + + + +Author + +Brown, John + + + +Author + +Cardinal, Sophie + + + +Author + +Goulet, Henri + + + +Author + +Hebert, Paul D. N. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2014 + +383 + + +1 +565 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.383.6418 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.383.6418 +1313-2970-383-1 +93106FE982C8493791E7339AEAD74BE5 +93106FE982C8493791E7339AEAD74BE5 + + + + + +Apanteles luiscantillanoi +Fernandez-Triana + +sp. n. +Figs 28, 230 + + + + +Apanteles +Rodriguez100. +Smith et al. (2008) +. Interim name provided by the authors. + + + +Type locality. +COSTA RICA, Alajuela, ACG, Sector Pitilla, Sendero Nacho, 710m, 10.98445, -85.42481. + + +Holotype. + +♀ in CNC. Specimen labels: 1. DHJPAR0038334. 2. COSTA RICA, Guanacaste, ACG, Sector Pitilla, Sendero Nacho, 27.i.2010, 10.98445°N, -85.42481°W, 710m, DHJPAR0038334. 3. Voucher: D.H.Janzen & W.Hallwachs, DB: http://janzen.sas.upenn.edu, Area de +Conservacion +Guanacaste, COSTA RICA, 10-SRNP-30404. + + + +Paratypes. +2 ♀ (CNC, NMNH). COSTA RICA, ACG database codes: DHJPAR0038362, DHJPAR0038363. + + +Description. + +Female. Body color: body mostly dark except for some sternites which may be pale. Antenna color: scape, pedicel, and flagellum dark. Coxae color (pro-, meso-, metacoxa): dark, dark, dark. Femora color (pro-, meso-, metafemur): anteriorly dark/posteriorly pale, dark, dark. Tibiae color (pro-, meso-, metatibia): pale, anteriorly pale/posteriorly dark, anteriorly pale/posteriorly dark. Tegula and humeral complex color: both dark. Pterostigma color: mostly pale and/or transparent, with thin dark borders. Fore wing veins color: partially pigmented (a few veins may be dark but most are pale). Antenna length/body length: antenna about as long as body (head to apex of metasoma); if slightly shorter, at least extending beyond anterior 0.7 metasoma length. Body in lateral view: not distinctly flattened +dorso-ventrally +. Body length (head to apex of metasoma): 2.3-2.4 mm, rarely 2.1-2.2 mm or 2.5-2.6 mm. Fore wing length: 2.3-2.4 mm or 2.5-2.6 mm. +Ocular-ocellar +line/posterior ocellus diameter: 2.0-2.2. Interocellar distance/posterior ocellus diameter: 1.7-1.9. Antennal flagellomerus 2 length/width: 2.9-3.1. Antennal flagellomerus 14 length/width: 1.4-1.6. Length of flagellomerus 2/length of flagellomerus 14: 2.3-2.5. Tarsal claws: simple. Metafemur length/width: 2.8-2.9. Metatibia inner spur length/metabasitarsus length: 0.4-0.5. Anteromesoscutum: mostly with deep, dense punctures (separated by less than 2.0 +x +its maximum diameter). Mesoscutellar disc: mostly smooth. Number of pits in scutoscutellar sulcus: 9 or 10. Maximum height of mesoscutellum lunules/maximum height of lateral face of mesoscutellum: 0.6-0.7. Propodeum areola: completely defined by carinae, including transverse carina extending to spiracle. Propodeum background sculpture: partly sculptured, especially on anterior 0.5. Mediotergite 1 length/width at posterior margin: 2.0-2.2. Mediotergite 1 shape: more or less +parallel-sided +. Mediotergite 1 sculpture: mostly sculptured, excavated area centrally with transverse striation inside and/or a polished knob centrally on posterior margin of mediotergite. Mediotergite 2 width at posterior margin/length: 3.6-3.9 or 4.0-4.3. Mediotergite 2 sculpture: mostly smooth. Outer margin of hypopygium: with a wide, medially folded, +transparent +, +semi-desclerotized +area; usually with 4 or more pleats. Ovipositor thickness: about same width throughout its length. Ovipositor sheaths length/metatibial length: 1.0-1.1, rarely 0.8-0.9. Length of fore wing veins r/2RS: 1.4-1.6. Length of fore wing veins 2RS/2M: 1.1-1.3. Length of fore wing veins 2M/(RS+M)b: 0.7-0.8. Pterostigma length/width: 3.6 or more. Point of insertion of vein r in pterostigma: clearly beyond half way point length of pterostigma. Angle of vein r with fore wing anterior margin: clearly outwards, inclined towards fore wing apex. Shape of junction of veins r and 2RS in fore wing: distinctly but not strongly angled. + +Male. Unknown. + + +Molecular data. +Sequences in BOLD: 11, barcode compliant sequences: 11. + + +Biology/ecology. + +Solitary (Fig. 230). Hosts: +Crambidae +, +Diacme +BioLep02, +Undulambia +Solis02, +Neurophyseta completalis +. + + + +Distribution. +Costa Rica, ACG. + + +Etymology. + +We dedicate this species to Luis Cantillo in recognition of his diligent efforts for the ACG Programa de +Proteccion +e Incendios. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/35/37063511F665B631391FDA9B02182522.xml b/data/37/06/35/37063511F665B631391FDA9B02182522.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..416d583c8f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/35/37063511F665B631391FDA9B02182522.xml @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ + + + +Annotated type catalogue of the Bulimulidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Orthalicoidea) in the Natural History Museum, London + + + +Author + +Breure, Abraham S. H. +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, Leiden, the Netherlands +bbreure@xs4all.nl + + + +Author + +Ablett, Jonathan D. +Natural History Museum, Division of Higher Invertebrates, London, SW 7 5 BD, UK + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2014 + +2014-03-21 + + +392 + + +1 +367 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.392.6328 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.392.6328 +1313-2970-392-1 +FFCF5A59FFB1FF93FFF10B43FFAFFFF5 +578044 + + + + +Bulimus tristis Pfeiffer, 1855 +Figs 22B +, L62i + + + + +Bulimus tristis +Pfeiffer 1855g +: 124; +Breure 1979 +: 124. + + +Drymaeus pertristis +Pilsbry 1898 [1897-1898] +: 301. New name for + +Bulimus tristis + +Pfeiffer, 1855 not Jay, 1839. + + +Drymaeus tristis +; +Linares and Vera 2012 +: 201 [partim]. + + +Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) pertristis +; +Breure and Eskens 1981 +: 81. + + + +Type locality. +"New Granada". + + +Label. + +"New Granada", taxon label in +Pfeiffer's +handwriting. M.C. label style IV. + + + +Dimensions. +"Long. 28, diam. 11 mill."; figured specimen herein H 29.3, D 13.3, W 6.6. + + +Type material. +NHMUK 1975299, three syntypes (Cuming coll.). + + +Remarks. + +Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. Breure and Borrero were not able to recognize this species in the material they revised from Colombia (unpublished data). The locality data in +Linares and Vera (2012) +need further evidence. + + + +Current systematic position. + +Bulimulidae +, + +Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) pertristis + +(Pfeiffer, 1855). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/74/3706743425EFEF3AF4EE56A9BD0DB8A9.xml b/data/37/06/74/3706743425EFEF3AF4EE56A9BD0DB8A9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e286b6a26e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/74/3706743425EFEF3AF4EE56A9BD0DB8A9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ + + + +Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 1. Pteridophyta bis Caryophyllaceae (2 nd edition): Registerzuband 1 + + + +Author + +Hess, Hans Ernst + + + +Author + +Landolt, Elias + + + +Author + +Hirzel, Rosmarie + +text + +1972 +Birkhaeuser Verlag + + +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291815 + +book +291815 +10.5281/zenodo.291815 +3-7643-0843-5 + + + +<subSubSection id="8ADD99E08EECD010DB7D43F1EC224AA3" pageId="null" pageNumber="177" type="nomenclature"> +<paragraph id="BC5F2417BE72B974DE87A079FC212BBC" pageId="null" pageNumber="177"> +<taxonomicName id="1A4FFFD70BBF53B81D486468992F6C80" ID-CoL="6NGH4" ID-ENA="58039" authority="L." class="Pinopsida" family="Cupressaceae" genus="Juniperus" kingdom="Plantae" order="Pinales" pageId="null" pageNumber="177" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="communis"> +Juniperus +<normalizedToken id="E4E6F95B0396309DB68A051538960394" originalValue="commúnis" pageId="null" pageNumber="177">communis</normalizedToken> +L. +</taxonomicName> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="057A42D65E2FEAA448EABD1B8005A945" pageId="null" pageNumber="177" type="vernacular_names"> +<paragraph id="E0A4CDFB13EF08374A8167CCD7F83368" pageId="null" pageNumber="177"> +<normalizedToken id="816EE65C9B3989419D10C78DA371AB4D" originalValue="Gewöhnlicher" pageId="null" pageNumber="177">Gewoehnlicher</normalizedToken> +Wacholder +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> + + + +Strauch aufrecht oder bogig aufsteigend, selten +baumfoermig +. Rinde an +aelteren +Pflanzen faserig +abschaelend +, graubraun. + +Blaetter +stets +nadelfoermig +, 8-20 mm lang und ca. 1 mm breit, +allmaehlich +und fein zugespitzt + +, am Grunde mit einer Abgliederungsstelle, +graugruen +, abstehend und gerade. ♂ und ♀ +Blueten +werden im Herbst in den Achseln von +Blaettern +(Nadeln) angelegt. ♀ +Bluete +mit 3-4 Fruchtschuppen. Beerenzapfen ( +"Wacholderbeeren" +) im 2. Jahr nach der +Bluete +reif, +kugelig +, dunkelbraun, blau bereift, im Durchmesser 4-9 mm, kurz gestielt, + +von der +zugehoerigen +Nadel weil +ueberragt +. + +- +Bluete +: +Fruehling +. + + +Zytologische Angaben. 2n += +22: +Material aus Skandinavien ( +Loeve +und +Loeve +1948); weitere +uebereinstimmende +Zaehlungen +in Tischler (1950). + + +Standort. +Kollin, montan, selten subalpin. Trockene, humose, steinige, basische bis neutrale +Boeden +; auch auf dichten, zeitweise staunassen Lehm- und +Tonboeden +. Lichte +Waelder +( +Foehrenwaelder +, +Flaumeichenwaelder +). + + +Verbreitung. Eurasiatische Pflanze: +Europa +(ohne arktische Gebiete); Nordafrika; in Asien +ostwaerts +bis ins +suedliche +Ob- und Jenisseigebiet. Verbreitungskarte von H +ulten +(1962). - Im Gebiet verbreitet und ziemlich +haeufig +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/87/370687D49131FFE41B1506FEFC87FAF9.xml b/data/37/06/87/370687D49131FFE41B1506FEFC87FAF9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..153e36c04f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/87/370687D49131FFE41B1506FEFC87FAF9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,255 @@ + + + +Redescriptions of beetles of the Notocupes generic complex (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Ommatidae) from the Lower Cretaceous of Buryatia + + + +Author + +STRELNIKOVA, OLESYA D. + + + +Author + +YAN, EVGENY V. + +text + + +Palaeoentomology + + +2021 + +2021-09-24 + + +4 + + +5 + + +499 +514 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.5.15 + +journal article +10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.5.15 +2624-2834 +5530240 +3747A7EE-21F8-4FC5-9B57-4B726A0AFBD0 + + + + + + + +Notocupes excellens +Ponomarenko, 1966 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 2–4 +) + + + + +Material. + +Holotype +PIN +, 1989/3007, part and counterpart of full body, +Baissa +locality; +Lower Cretaceous. + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Genae protruding anteriorly as pair of acute processes, lateral to mandibles. Pronotum with dentate lateral margins.Antennae reaching slightly beyond pronotal base, weakly moniliform. Elytra with rectangular cells with somewhat rounded angles. Maximum of cells in a row 26. Black maculae absent. Cells occupy more than half distance between veins, often reaching lateral margin of fields, forming weak zigzag pattern. Epipleural margin dentate near elytral base, epipleuron narrow. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Notocupes excellens + +(PIN, 1989/3007 +) +. +A +, Wetted with 95% ethanol. +B +, Dry. +C +, Interpretative line drawing (here and on the further figures square “a” indicate area with small tubercles and square “b” indicate area with larger tubercles). Abbreviations here and in the following figures: dep, depressions; epl, epipleura; gen, genae; hypo, hypomeron; lab, labrum; me+sme+gu, fused mentum, submentum and gular plate; mnd, mandibles; pl, pleura; pra, praementum; prst, prosternum; prtr, protrochantin; s.gu, sutura gularis; s.n.pl., sutura notopleuralis; s.pl.st., sutura pleurasternalis. + + + + +FIGURE 3. +Counterpart of + +Notocupes excellens + +(PIN, 1989/3007 +) +. +A +, Counterpart wetted with 95% ethanol. +B +, Interpretative line drawing. + + + + +Description. +Body length/width ratio 2.8. Cuticular tubercles roundish, uniformly covering entire body, on most regions around +0.02 mm +in diameter with density of 720 tubercles per mm² ( +Fig. 2 +C-b); larger on meso- and metaventrite, apical abdominal sternite and on depressed areas of abdominal sternites III–VI, with +0.06 mm +diameter and density of 228 per mm² ( +Fig. 2 +C-a). Distance between tubercles on areas with smaller ones +0.01–0.02 mm +, approximately equal to single tubercle diameter; on areas with large tubercles distance at most +0.01 mm +, notably smaller than diameter of tubercles. Elytra without color pattern. + + +Head: transverse, length +1.8 mm +, head length/body length ratio 5.3. Maximum width +1.2 mm +. Head not narrowed in front of eyes, gradually narrowing behind eyes, with neck constriction weak. Head length in front of eyes less than behind them, slightly longer than diameter of eyes. Protuberances on head not visible. Eyes large, protruding laterally, approximately +0.4 mm +in diameter. Head width/ocular diameter ratio 3.1. Labrum transverse, medially incised, anterior angles not rounded.Praementum small, semioval; mentum, submentum and gular plate fused. Mandibles with at least 2 preapical teeth; weakly curved. Antennae reaching slightly beyond pronotal base, +2.7 mm +long, weakly moniliform, attached near anterior ocular margins. Antennomeres slightly widening distally; 1–6 elongate-oval, subsequent ones narrower, subtrapezoidal; scapus length +0.4 mm +, width +0.3 mm +; pedicellus equal to antennomere 3, 0.7 times as long as scapus, almost 0.8 times as long as 4, and 1.4 times as long as 5; remaining antennomeres gradually decreasing in size towards antennal apex. + + +Pronotum: +1.8 mm +long, maximum width— +2.7 mm +; posterior margin 1.5 times wider than long. Pronotal maximum width/head width ratio 2.2. Anterior angles strongly protruding forward. Pronotal posterior margin straight, without posterior angles protruding posterolaterally; lateral margin dentate; disk with two median protuberances. + + +Prosternum: +1.2 mm +long. Body length/prosternal length ratio 7.9. Prosternum longer than wide. Prosternal length/head length ratio 0.7. Notopleural and pleurosternal sutures clearly visible, former thickened, both angled towards midline of body at 1/3 of anterior length, then straight. Prosternal process indistinct, procoxae contiguous. + + + +FIGURE 4. +Line drawings of elytra of + +Notocupes excellens + +. +A +, Mirrored line drawing of left elytra of part. +B +, Line drawing of right elytra of part. +C +, Line drawing of left elytra of elongate-oval cells, counterpart. +D +, Mirrored line drawing of right elytra of counterpart. +E +, General scheme of + +Notocupes excellens + +elytra. Labels here and in the following: Roman numerals—fields; Arabic numerals—veins. + + +Scutellar shield: pentagonal. +Elytra: Rectangular cells with somewhat rounded angles. Field I lacks cells, other fields with double rows of cells; fields II and IV contain 26 cells, field III 21 cells; field V has 20–21 cells and field VI about 25; field VII lacks cells. Number of cell rows 10. Cells occupy more than half distance between veins, often reaching lateral margins of fields, forming weak zigzag patterns. Elytral length/width ratio 3.1. Eight veins in total, veins 2 and 3 with common stem, starting 2 cells anterior to basal elytral margin; vein 2 curved, bordering epipleural margin; vein 3 gently s-shaped; veins 2 and 3 with four cells merged, veins 4 with five cells merged anterior to elytral apex; veins 2+3 and 4+5 meet margin of elytra. Maximum width of elytra at midlength. Epipleural margin dentate near elytral base; epipleuron narrow, width near elytral base/width near apex ratio 4. Elytral base straight, humeral bulge distinct and convex; elytral apex acute. Elytra extending beyond abdominal apex posteriorly. Elytral maximum width/pronotal maximum width ratio 1.5. + +Metaventrite: long, width at anterior margin +0.8 mm +, at posterior margin +2 mm +. Pronotal length/length of metaventrite ratio 1.8; posterior width of metaventrite/ anterior width ratio 2.5; width at posterior margin/length ratio 2; metaventrite slightly shorter than mesoventrite. Lateral region with oblique depressions, covered with large tubercles, similar to those on abdominal sternites. Median portion of metaventrite with elongate-triangular elevation. + + +Abdomen: pattern of sternites forming distinct relief. Sides of apical sternite VII and sternites III–VI (ventrites 1–4) with paired roundish or triangular depressions ( +Fig. 2 +—dep). Abdomen slightly narrowing towards pointed apex, starting from the fourth ventrite. Length ratio of visible ventrites (sternites III–VII) 2:1:1:1:2.6. Length/ width ratio of apical sternite VII 1.6. + + +Legs: procoxae round, contiguous, located at posterior prosternal margin, +0.4 mm +wide. Pronotal width/procoxal width ratio 6.7. Profemora thickest at midlength, +1.5 mm +long; profemoral length/maximum width of pronotum ratio 1.8. Tibiae parallel-sided, with longitudinal keel and one or two rows of transverse ridges; length +1.2–1.3 mm +. Tarsomeres sizes from 1 to 5 are: 0.2:0.2:0.1:0.1:0.2. Middle coxae rounded. Metacoxae cover more than half of first abdominal ventrite (sternite III), width 1.3 times exceeding length. + + +Measurements. +Length— +9.5 mm +, width— +3.3 mm +, elytral length— +6.5 mm +, elytral width— +2.1 mm +. + + + + +Remarks. +In the original descriptions it was stated that the cephalic area between the eyes has longitudinal keels, that pointed protuberances are present above the eyes, and that deep antennal furrows are present on the ventral surface of the head. Our investigation reveals that these observations were likely incorrect: the head is mostly visible in ventral view, which makes it impossible to verify the characters mentioned above. Structures addressed as “antennal furrows” are most likely gular sutures. + + +The species under consideration is similar to Triassic + +N +. +laticella + +in the length of the antennae, which also reach slightly beyond the base of the pronotum; with + +N +. +khasurtyiensis +Strelnikova, 2019 + +it shares moniliform antenna, with + +N +. +caudatus +Ponomarenko, 1966 a + +dentate lateral edge of the pronotum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/87/370687D49134FFEA18B701D2FC87F79A.xml b/data/37/06/87/370687D49134FFEA18B701D2FC87F79A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3279a32ec7c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/87/370687D49134FFEA18B701D2FC87F79A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ + + + +Redescriptions of beetles of the Notocupes generic complex (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Ommatidae) from the Lower Cretaceous of Buryatia + + + +Author + +STRELNIKOVA, OLESYA D. + + + +Author + +YAN, EVGENY V. + +text + + +Palaeoentomology + + +2021 + +2021-09-24 + + +4 + + +5 + + +499 +514 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.5.15 + +journal article +10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.5.15 +2624-2834 +5530240 +3747A7EE-21F8-4FC5-9B57-4B726A0AFBD0 + + + + + + + +Notocupes caudatus +Ponomarenko, 1966 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 5–7 +) + + + + +Material. + +Holotype +PIN +, 1989/3002, part and counterpart of full body, +Baissa +locality; +Lower Cretaceous. + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Lateral keels on vertex well defined. Anterior pronotal angles slightly protruding; sides of pronotum dentate. Elytra with elongate-oval cells; maximum of cells per row 27. Epipleuron wide along entire length. Terminal abdominal sternite VII 3.1 times longer than VI. + + + + +Description. +Body length/width ratio 2.1. Cuticular tubercles round, evenly distributed, on most parts diameter +ca +. +0.03 mm +and density 656 tubercles per mm² ( +Fig. 5 +E-a); larger on terminal abdominal sternite VII and in depressions of sternites III–VI, diameter 0.05 and density 211 ( +Fig. 5 +E-b). Distance between smaller tubercles +0.01– 0.02 mm +, between larger ones +0.02–0.03 mm +, +i +. +e +., less than diameter of tubercles. Elytra without color pattern. + + +Head: transverse, length +1.8 mm +, exceeding width. Body length/head length ratio 6; neck constriction absent. Eye diameter 1.4 times exceeds head length in front of eyes and 1.2 times behind eyes. Head retracted within pronotum to level of posterior margin of posteromesal (Р3) protuberance. Vertical region divided by longitudinal furrow; lateral keels on vertex well defined. Posteromesal protuberance rounded. Head width approximately +1.2 mm +; head width/ocular diameter ratio 2. Labrum large, rectangular. Mandibles with single preapical tooth; basal third curved. Praementum small, rounded. Antennae attached near anterior margin of eyes; antennal insertions covered from above by supraantennal protuberance (Р1). antennal furrows on head absent. Scapus enlarged, curved, +0.6 mm +long, +0.3 mm +wide; length of scapus/length of pedicellus ratio 1.6. Antennomeres 1–3 slightly widening distally. + + +Pronotum: length +2.1 mm +, width +3.3 mm +; width/ length ratio 1.6; maximum width/width of anterior margin ratio 1.5. Anterior angles slightly protruding forward, is half as long as the temples; posterior margin rounded, sides dentate; maximum width at posterior margin. Pronotal disk with pair of bean-shaped protuberances, slightly narrowing anteriorly, with median furrow between them. Notopleural and pleurosternal sutures not clearly visible. + +Scutellar shield: somewhat rhomboid. +Elytra: cells rounded, not elongated, almost circular on distal half. Single row of large cells presents in field I, other fields with two rows of cells; field II with 20 cells, fields III and IV with about 27, field V with 19, field VI with 25, and field VII with 3. Number of cells rows 10 on dorsal side of elytra and 1 on epipleuron. Maculae around cells and within walls of cells present, with number varying from 4 to 8. Distal half of field I with 5 or 6 maculae around one cell, distal portion of elytron with 4 or 5 maculae per cell. Middle portion of field IV usually with 6 maculae around one cell, anterior and preapical areas with 5. Field V with 6 maculae around one cell, but anterior and preapical areas with 5 and 4, respectively. Cells of field VI mostly with 5 or 6 maculae, but some cells on anterior third with 7 or 8. Field VII with cells surrounded by 5 maculae. Cells occupy little more than half distance between veins, not reaching lateral edges of fields. Elytral length/width ratio 3; elytra slightly extending beyond abdominal apex posteriorly. Veins 2 and 3 most likely with common stem; vein 2 running along epipleural margin; vein 3 straight; veins 4 and 5 merge five cells anterior to elytral apex; 2 and 3 reach elytral apex. Elytral maximum width at midlength. Epipleural margin curving slightly towards the apex; epipleuron wide, scarcely narrowing at elytral apex. Epipleural width near elytral base/width near elytral apex ratio 1.3. Elytral base and apex rounded. Humeral bulge not prominent. Elytral width/pronotal width ratio 2. + + +FIGURE 5. + +Notocupes caudatus + +(PIN, 1989/3002). +A +, Wetted with 95% ethanol. +B +, Details of head. +C +, Dry (black rectangle indicate area on figure +D +). +D +, Elytral cells. +E +, Interpretative line drawing, dorsal aspect. Abbreviations: l.ke, lateral keels; P1, supraantennal protuberance; P2, supraocular protuberance; P3, posteromesal protuberance. All pictures are mirrored. + + + + +FIGURE 6. +Counterpart of + +Notocupes caudatus + +(PIN, 1989/3002). +A +, Counterpart wetted with 95% ethanol. +B +, Dry. +C +, Interpretative line drawing, ventral aspect. + + + +Metaventrite: length about +1.8 mm +, width at posterior margin +2.8 mm +. Width of posterior margin of metaventrite/ length ratio 2.3. Ratio of combined length of meso- and metaventrite versus length of abdominal 0.6. + + +Abdomen: length +6.5 mm +. Relief of sternites very prominent. Apical sternite and depressed portions of sternites III–VI with sculpture of large tubercles. Abdomen narrowing posteriorly, starting from sternite VI, abdominal apex pointed. Length ratio of sternites: 2.1:1:1:1:3.1. Width of apical sternite/length ratio 1.4. + + + +FIGURE 7. +General scheme of + +Notocupes caudatus + +elytra. + + + +Legs: pro- and mesocoxa not visible; metacoxae distinctly narrowed laterally, their length is +0.6 mm +, width +2 mm +, posterior margin not reaching midlength of ventrite 1 (abdominal sternite III). Metacoxal width 3.3 times exceeding length. + + +Measurements. +Length— +14 mm +, width— +6.7 mm +, elytral length— +10.2 mm +, elytral width— +3.4 mm +. + + + + +Remarks. +The width of the head is difficult to estimate due to its tilted position. It is mentioned in the original description that the pronotal posterior angles are protruding posterolaterally ( +Ponomarenko, 1966a +). However, the left side of the pronotum is not preserved and the sharp angle with the pronotal posterior margin is formed by its remnants. The right side of the pronotum is also tilted and lacks protruding posterior angles. We reinterpret a previously described transverse protuberance along the pronotal posterior margin as internal sculpture along the pronotal posterior margin visible in ventral perspective.Structures, interpreted as small procoxae in the original description are in fact depressions on the backside of the pronotum. The species is similar to + +N +. +excellens + +in the presence of dentate lateral edges of the pronotum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/87/370687D4913AFFEB1B1504FFFAADF9F9.xml b/data/37/06/87/370687D4913AFFEB1B1504FFFAADF9F9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a275d8bc232 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/87/370687D4913AFFEB1B1504FFFAADF9F9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ + + + +Redescriptions of beetles of the Notocupes generic complex (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Ommatidae) from the Lower Cretaceous of Buryatia + + + +Author + +STRELNIKOVA, OLESYA D. + + + +Author + +YAN, EVGENY V. + +text + + +Palaeoentomology + + +2021 + +2021-09-24 + + +4 + + +5 + + +499 +514 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.5.15 + +journal article +10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.5.15 +2624-2834 +5530240 +3747A7EE-21F8-4FC5-9B57-4B726A0AFBD0 + + + + + + + +Notocupes vitimensis +Ponomarenko, 1966 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 8–10 +) + + + + +Material. + +Holotype +– +PIN +, 1989/3022, part and counterpart of full body, +Baissa +locality; +Lower Cretaceous. + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Elytra with small rounded cells with black maculae around them. Maximum number of cells per row is 27. Epipleuron narrow, without cells. Last abdominal sternite 2.9 times longer than previous one. + + + + +Description. +Cuticular tubercles round, evenly distributed, diameter +ca +. +0.02 mm +and density 789 per mm +2 +on most regions ( +Fig. 9 +C-a); larger on terminal abdominal sternite VII, in depressions on sternites III–VI and on metanepisterna, diameter +0.03 mm +and density 485 per mm +2 +( +Fig. 9 +C-b). Distance between smaller tubercles +0.01–0.02 mm +. Elytra with three V-shaped transverse darker spots ( +Fig. 8A +). + + +Pronotum:maximum width +2.3 mm +; sides not dentate. Pronotal disc with paired rectangular protuberances and median furrow between them. + +Prosternum: pleurosternal sutures more or less straight; notopleural sutures diverging posteriorly. Propleuron narrowing anteriorly, more or less triangular. +Scutellar shield: not preserved. +Elytra: with rounded cells; cells missing in field I, other fields with two rows; field II only partially preserved; fields III and IV with about 27 cells, field V with 23, field VI with 24, and field VII with 3. Number of cell rows 10. Elytral cells with black maculae, with numbers varying from 4 to 7. Fields IV and V usually with 5 maculae, but cells closer to elytral base and areas around converging veins with only 4; more than half of cells at elytral midlength with 6 maculae, and some around area of elytral maximum width with 7. Usually, cells with increased number of maculae (6–7) surrounded by 4-maculae cells. Field VI, near elytral base (first 6 cell pairs), with cells with 5 maculae, next 4 pairs of cells with 6 maculae, and up to 7 maculae at elytral midlength. Field VII with two cells with 4 maculae and one cell with 5. Cells occupy more than half distance between veins and often reach lateral margins of fields, resulting in zigzag pattern of veins. Elytral length/width ratio 3.3, elytra slightly extending beyond abdominal apex posteriorly. Veins 2 and 3 with common stem; veins 2 slightly curved, but not following shape of epipleural margin. Vein 3 slightly curved near elytral apex; veins 4 and 5 merge three cells anterior to apex, and vein 3 merges with them three cells posterior to this site; vein 2 reaches elytral apex. Elytron with maximum width at midlength. Epipleural margin curving slightly towards apex. Epipleuron narrow, not narrowing at basal third but then gradually narrowing towards apex. Epipleural width near elytral base/epipleural width near elytral apex ratio 3.4. Elytral base and apex rounded. Humeral bulge not prominent. Elytral width/pronotal width ratio 2. + + +FIGURE 8. +Counterpart of +Notocu +pes vitimensis (PIN, 1989/3022). +A +, Wetted with 95% ethanol. +B +, Dry. +C +, Interpretative line drawing, ventral asp +e +ct. Abbreviations: cx1, coxa1; f.p., furcal pit. + + + +Metaventrite: length around +1.4 mm +, width at posterior margin +2.6 mm +, on anterior margin +0.9 mm +. Width of posterior margin of metaventrite/anterior margin ratio 2.9; width of posterior margin/length ratio 1.8. + +Abdomen: relief of sternites very prominent. Apical sternite VII and depressed portions of sternites III–VI with sculpture of large tubercles. Abdomen narrowing posteriorly starting from sternite VI, with pointed apex formed by sternite VII. Length ratio of sternites 1.7:1:1:1:2.9. Apical sternite VII with width to length ratio 1.5. +Legs: procoxae transverse, with protruding, anterolaterally oriented protrochantins, located close to posterior pronotal margin. Mesocoxae rounded, narrowly separated. Metacoxae 1.8 times wider than long. + +Measurements. +Elytral length— +8 mm +, width— +2.4 mm +. + + + + +Remarks. +Paired rounded tubercles in front of the posterior pronotal margin were mentioned in the original description ( +Ponomarenko, 1966a +). They are now reinterpreted as visible outlines of the procoxаe. Rounded furcal pits are visible in front of them ( +Fig. 8C—f.p +., see +DuPorte, 1965 +;fup.; + +Friedrich +et al +.,2009 + +).Most species of the + +Notocupes + +complex have contiguous coxae, although species with separated coxae have also been described ( +Soriano & Delclòs, 2006 +). The presence of an intercoxal process in + +Amblomma +species + +was the main character to separate them from + +Notocupes + +. However, in some species this character is not visible, and was suggested to be excluded from the diagnosis ( +Kirejtshuk, 2010 +). As this character is not visible in specimens of the +type +series of + +N +. +vitimensis + +, it is still a topic for discussion. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/87/370687D4913BFFE91B1502DFFD83F9E1.xml b/data/37/06/87/370687D4913BFFE91B1502DFFD83F9E1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..97d454f7d19 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/87/370687D4913BFFE91B1502DFFD83F9E1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@ + + + +Redescriptions of beetles of the Notocupes generic complex (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Ommatidae) from the Lower Cretaceous of Buryatia + + + +Author + +STRELNIKOVA, OLESYA D. + + + +Author + +YAN, EVGENY V. + +text + + +Palaeoentomology + + +2021 + +2021-09-24 + + +4 + + +5 + + +499 +514 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.5.15 + +journal article +10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.5.15 +2624-2834 +5530240 +3747A7EE-21F8-4FC5-9B57-4B726A0AFBD0 + + + + + + + +Zygadenia alexrasnitsyni + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 11 +) + + + + +Material. + +Holotype +PIN +, 1989/2989, part and counterpart of left elytron, +Baissa +locality; +Lower Cretaceous. + + + + + +Etymology. +Named for Prof. Alexandr P. Rasnitsyn. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Elytral cells rounded; maximum of cells in one row 38; no pairs but seven triplets of cells near elytral base. Epipleura with incomplete row of cells strongly narrowing towards posterior end of elytra and reaching elytral apex. Maculae around cells and within walls of cells present. Elytral apex protruding as tonguelike extension, slightly pointing laterad. + + + + +FIGURE 9. +Notocupes +vitim +ensis +(PIN, 1989/3022). +A +, Interpretati +v +e line drawing, dorsal aspe +c +t (grey filling indicates elytral color pattern). +B +, Counterpart wetted with 95% ethanol (rectangle indicate area within C photograph). +C +, Details of elytral cells. +D +, Scheme of the distribution of cells and tubercles on the elytra (numbers indicate quantity of tubercles around cells). All pictures are mirrored. + + + + +Description. +Elytral cells rounded. Field I with partially preserved row of 7 cells, other fields with double cell rows; field II with 31 cells, narrowing posteriorly and then merging with epipleural edge; cells therefore lacking in this interval; fields III and IV with 38 cells, field V with 29, field VI with 37 cells, and field VII with 5 cells. Number of cell rows 10+1. + + +Maculae around cells and within walls of cells present, number varying from 4 to 7. Field I with 4 or very rarely 5 maculae around one cell; field II usually with 5 maculae, but with +7 in +the midlength region of the elytron; cells of field III mostly with 5 maculae, at midlength with 6, and 4 or 6 closer to elytral apex; usually cells with 6 maculae surrounded by cells with 4; field IV usually with 5 or 6 maculae around one cell; number of cells varying between 5 and 7; not arranged in pairs but in triplets (7) near elytral base. Fields V and VI with cells with different number of maculae: usually 5, but 4 near elytral base and 6 or 7 near apex. Field VII with two cells with 4 maculae and three with 5. Cells occupy half distance between veins and do not reach lateral edges of fields. + +Elytral length/width ratio 3. Veins 2 and 3 with common stem, four cells posterad anterior elytral edge; vein 2 running along epipleural margin; vein 3 slightly curved; veins 4 and 5 merge six cells anteriad elytral apex. Elytra reach maximum width around basal third. Basal third of epipleuron wide, then abruptly narrowing and reaching elytral apex without changing width. Epipleural width near elytral base/ epipleural width near apex ratio 2,8.Elytral base rounded and humeral bulge not prominent. Elytral apex extended as tongue-like protrusion. + +Measurements. +Elytral length— +14.7 mm +, width— +4.8 mm +. + + + + +Remarks. +ItwaspointedoutbyPonomarenko(1966a) that this species is similar to + +N +. +excellens + +. However, our study revealed differences: the cells of + +N +. +excellens + +are not round, but rectangular with rounded angles, without maculae; the epipleural (outer) margin is dentate near the elytral base and the epipleuron much narrower and without cells; the humerus is not prominent and the elytral base is straight and less rounded. + +Z +. +alexrasnitsyni + + +sp. nov. + +is distinctly larger than all + +Notocupes +species + +from Baissa locality and displays a peculiar character: the presence of cell triplets at the base of field IV. This feature was previously unknown in + +Zygadenia + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA2FFF3FF5B6378FE16FD66.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA2FFF3FF5B6378FE16FD66.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a91032d08c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA2FFF3FF5B6378FE16FD66.xml @@ -0,0 +1,206 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + + +Anthobium jaegeri +Shavrin & Smetana + +, +sp.n. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 2 +, +53–55 +) + + + + +Type material examined: + +Holotype +♂ +[dissected]: ‘ +Nepal +, +Kali +Gandaki +Tal +, | westl. oberh. +Lete +, degr. | Rhododen- dron +Wald +, + +2900 m + +, | + +19.V.2002 + +, leg. [O.] +Jäger, BG +| +N28°37’24’’ E 83°35’38’’’ +<rectangular label, printed>, ‘HO- LOTYPE | +Anthobium +| jaegeri + +sp.n. + +| +Shavrin A.V. +& +Smetana A. +2019’ <red rectangulat label, printed> ( +SNSD +). + + + + + +Description +. Measurements: HW: 0.57; HL: 0.37; AL: 1.18; OL: 0.15; PL: 0.55; PW: 0.87; ESL: 1.24; EW: 1.18; AW: 0.87; MTbL: 0.62; MTrL: 0.30 (MTrL 1–4: 0.20; MTrL 5: 0.10); AedL: 0.50; TL: 2.76. + + +Head brown; apical and preapical segment of maxillary palp, pronotum, elytra and abdomen reddish-brown, with somewhat paler apical portions of pronotum, elytra and apical tergites; mouthparts, antennomeres and legs yellow (antennomeres 8–11 somewhat darker). Head with fine, deep punctation, denser on infraorbital ridges, with paired transverse impunctated portions in middle between eyes; middle part of neck with very sparse, irregular punctation; pronotum with dense punctation, markedly larger than that on head, markedly smaller and sparser on mediobasal third, and sparser laterally; punctation of elytra as that on pronotum, but markedly sparser, finer and denser in parascutellar portion, finer along suture, each elytron bearing six very vague and tangled longitudinal rows of punctures; abdominal tergites without visible punctures. Habitus as in +Fig. 2 +. + +Head one and half times as wide as long, with slightly elevated middle portion without impressions, with very indistinct, short, moderately deep grooves in front of ocelli and narrow impression between ocelli; postocular ridge acute and markedly protruded; anterior portion between antennal insertion and anterior margin of eye with small, indistinct semicircular notch. Length × width of antennomeres: 1: 0.12 × 0.05; 2: 0.11 × 0.03; 3: 0.10 × 0.02; 4–6: 0.11 × 0.03; 7: 0.11 × 0.04; 8: 0.10 × 0.04; 9: 0.10 × 0.05; 10: 0.08 × 0.05; 11: 0.13 × 0.05. + + +FIGURE 55. +Distribution of + +Anthobium consanguineum + +(black circles) in China and + +A. jaegeri + +(black square) in Nepal. + + +Pronotum subrectangular, 1.5 times as wide as long, widest in anterior third; middle portion widely elevated, with indistinct, semioval impression on mediobasal third, and with very deep, oval pits in about middle. +Elytra more than twice as long as pronotum, reaching apical margin of abdominal tergite V; surface of each elytron with indistinct, irregular longitudinal elevations between punctures on medioapical third and with indistinct longitudinal elevation in middle between suture and first row of punctures. + +Male. Apical margins of abdominal tergite VIII and sternite VIII slightly sinuate. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 53 +) moderately wide; parameres narrow, straight in apical portion, markedly exceeding apex of median lobe, with two pairs of apical setae; internal sac wide, moderately short. Aedeagus laterally as in +Fig. 54 +. + +Female unknown. + +Comparative notes. + +Anthobium jaegeri + + +sp.n. + +differs from the similar + +A +. +consanguineum + + +sp.n. + +by the shape of subrectangular pronotum, and by the details of both internal and external characters of the aedeagus. + + + + +Distribution. +The species is known only from the +type +locality in central +Nepal +( +Fig. 55 +). + + +Bionomics. +The +holotype +was collected in + +Rhododendron + +forest at elevation +2900 m +a.s.l. + + + + +Etymology. +Eponymic, the species is named to honor our colleague Olaf Jäger (Dresden, +Germany +), the collector of the +holotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA3FFF3FF5B65EFFA04F901.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA3FFF3FF5B65EFFA04F901.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0aa5ee4de8d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA3FFF3FF5B65EFFA04F901.xml @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + +Key to the species of the + +crassum + +group + + + + + + + + +1 Pronotum with anterior angles widely rounded, lateral margins with strong tooth-shaped projections. Lateral portions of elytra very wide. Body yellow-brown. Apical portion of median lobe wide, parameres narrow and very long, internal sac simple ( +Fig. 69 +). Body length: +3.20–3.27 mm +. Habitus as in +Fig. 58 +. +China +: +Sichuan +........................... + +A. explanatum + + +sp.n. + + + + + +- Pronotum with more narrow anterior angles, lateral margins with indistinct to distinct small projections. Lateral portions of pronotum markedly narrower. Body reddish-brown to brown. Apical portion of median lobe narrower, parameres wider and shorter, internal sac with complex, large distal portion ( +Figs. 60, 62 +, +71 +).......................................... 2 + + + + + + +2 Punctation of pronotum and elytra small and sparse. Aedeagus as in +Fig. 71 +. Body length: +3.87 mm +. Habitus as in +Fig. 59 +. +China +: +Sichuan +............................................................................ + +A. farkaci + + +sp.n. + + + + + +- Punctation of pronotum large, deep, and dense. Aedeagi different ( +Figs. 60, 62 +)................................... 3 + + + + + + +3 Elytra short, slightly widened posteriad, about as long as combined wide. Median lobe rather narrow, parameres longer, markedly exceeding apex of median lobe ( +Fig. 60 +). Body smaller: +2.62–3.12 mm +. Habitus as in +Fig. 56 +. +China +: +Yunnan +................................................................................................ + +A. crassum + + +sp.n. + + + + + +- Elytra subparallel-sided, long, longer than combined wide. Median lobe wide, parameres shorter, slightly exceeding apex of median lobe ( +Fig. 62 +). Body larger: +3.40 mm +. Habitus as in +Fig. 57 +. +China +: +Yunnan +.................. + +A. crenulatum + + +sp.n. + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA3FFF6FF5B667DFEEFF9E2.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA3FFF6FF5B667DFEEFF9E2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b27d44c9bf7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA3FFF6FF5B667DFEEFF9E2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,638 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + + +Anthobium crassum +Shavrin & Smetana + +, +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs. 4, 7, 10, 13 +, +16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 +, +37, 40, 43, 46 +, 49, 56, 60–61, 64–66) + + + + +Type material examined: + +Holotype +♂ +: ‘ +CHINA +: N-Yunnan +Zhongdian +| Co. + +10km +SW Zhongdian + +, +Xue +| +Shan + + + + +27°46.5’N +99°36.5’E +| + +3800m + + +20.VIII.2003 + +| +A. Smetana +[C129]’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘ +HOLOTYPE +| An- thobium | crassum + +sp.n. + +| +Shavrin A.V. +& +Smetana A. +2018’ <red rectangulat label, printed> ( +NSMT +). + + + + +Paratypes + +( +14 specimens +): + +1 ♀ +[dissected]: ‘ +CHINA +: N-Yunnan +Diqing +Tibet +| +Aut.Pr.Zhongdian Co. +Xue Shan | near lake, + +23 km +S Zhongdian + +| +27°37.1’N +99°38.5’E + +3895m + +| + + +15. +VI +.2005 + + +A. Smetana +[C161]’ <rectangular label, printed> ( +NSMT +) + +; +2 ♂♂ +[one specimen dissected], + +3 ♀♀ +: ‘ +CHINA +: N-Yunnan [C2005-05A] | +Diqing +Tibet +. +Aut. Pref. +, | +Zhongdian Co. +, +Xue Shan +near | lake + +23 km +S Zhongdian + +, 3895 m’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘ +27°37.1’N +, +99°38.5’ E +, devast[ated]. | mixed forest, meadows, lake | border, leaf litter, dead wood, | sifted, + + +6. +VI +.2005 + + +, | leg. +M. Schülke +[C2005-05A]’ <rectangular label, printed> ( +CS +; +CSC +) + +; + +2 ♂♂ +[one specimen dissected]: ‘ +CHINA +: N- +Yunnan +[C2005-05B] | +Diqing +Tibet +. +Aut. Pref. +, | +Zhongdian Co. +, +Xue Shan +near | lake + +23 km +S Zhongdian + +, 3895 m’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘ +27°37.1’N +, +99°38.5’ E +, devast[ated]. | mixed forest, meadows, lake | border, leaf litter, dead wood, | sifted, + + +15. +VI +.2005 + + +, | leg. +M. Schülke +[C2005-05B]’ <rectangular label, printed> ( +CSC +; +CS +) + +; +1 ♂ +[dissected], + +1 ♀ +: ‘ +CHINA +(N-Yunnan) +Zhongdian +| +Co. +, +Xue Shan +, +10 km +SW | +Zhongdian +, + +3700-3800m + +, | +27°46.5’N +/ +99°36.5’E +(primary | mixed forest, leaf litter sifted) | + +20.VIII.2003 + +[D.] +Wrase +[10A]’ ( +CSC +) + +; + +1 ♂ +[dis- sected]: ‘ +CHINA +N +Yunnan +, +Xue +| +Shan +nr. +Zhongdian +| + +4000-4100 m + + + +23. +VI +.96 + + +| +27°40N +99°34E +C36’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘collected by | +A. Smetana +, +J. Farkač +| and +P. Kabátek’ +<rectangular label, printed> ( +NSMT +) + +; + +1 ♂ +[dissected]: ‘ +CHINA +N +Yunnan +, +Xue +| +Shan +nr. +Zhongdian +| + +4050m + + + +24. +VI +.1996 + + +| +27°49N +99°34E +C40’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘collected by | +A. Smetana +, +J. Farkač +| and +P. Kabátek’ +<rectangular label printed> ( +CS +) + +; + +1 ♂ +[dis- sected]: ‘ +CHINA +, +Yunnan +, +Haba +| +Shan, N +27°21’01’’ | E100°05’44’’, + +4072m + +, | + +28.vi.2012 + +, sift35 | +V. Grebennikov’ +<rectangular label, printed> ( +CNC +) + +; + +1 ♀ +: ‘ +CHINA +, +Yunnan +, | +Haba Shan, N +27°20’58’’ | E100°05’58’’, | + +19.vi.2012 + +, 4114m, | sift24, +V. Grebennikov’ +<rectangular label, printed> ( +CNC +) + +. + +All +paratypes +with additional red rectangular printed label + +: ‘ +PARATYPE +| +Anthobium +| crassum + +sp.n. + +| Shavrin A.V. & Smetana A. 2018’. + + +One specimen with destroyed apical portion of elytra and abdomen was not included in the +type +series, it was dissected and used for the preparing of +Figs. 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 +of the body parts; label of this specimen: ‘ +CHINA +N +Yunnan +, Xue Shan nr. Zhongdian +4050m + +24. +VI +.1996 + +27°49N +99°34E +C40’, ‘collected by +A. Smetana +, J. Farkač and +P. Kabátek’ +( +CS +). + + + + +Description +. Measurements (n=15): HW: 0.65–0.70; HL: 0.37–0.41; AL: 1.19; OL: 0.15–0.18; PL: 0.47–0.50; PW: 1.08–1.27; ESL: 1.17–1.50; EW: 1.37–1.61; AW: 1.10–1.32; MTbL: 0.57; MTrL: 0.25 (MTrL 1–4: 0.15; MTrL 5: 0.10); AedL: 0.62–0.72; TL: 2.62–3.12 ( +holotype +: 2.66). + + +Body small, robust, convex. Body and antennomeres 7–11 reddish-brown to brown, usually with lateral portions of pronotum and elytra yellow-brown and somewhat paler abdomen; mouthparts, antennomeres 1–6 and legs yellow. Body shiny; forebody without microsculpture except for posterior part of infraorbital ridges, with indistinct diagonal meshes between punctures; abdomen with indistinct to distinct transverse or isodiametric microsculpture. Head with irregular, large and deep punctation, markedly denser between grooves in front of ocelli, denser and finer on infraorbital ridges, usually with small transverse impunctated portions in middle; neck with regular, moderately dense and deep punctation; pronotum with dense punctation, somewhat larger than that on middle portion of head, finer on medioapical fourth, distinctly sparser on mediobasal and sometimes denser on lateral portions, and with variable, more or less wide impunctated area on mediobasal third in some specimens; scutellum with several very fine punctures; punctation of elytra dense, somewhat larger and deeper than that on pronotum, sparser and finer on parascutellar portion, with interspaces between punctures in middle as long as diameter of one or two nearest punctures, each elytron bearing six very vague and tangled longitudinal rows of punctures, replaced by confluent punctures in some +paratypes +; abdominal tergites with very fine and sometimes indistinct regular punctation. Body glabrous; clypeus with several semierect, moderately long tactile setae; anterior part of frons with several irregular small setae; lateral margins of pronotum with several very short setae; abdominal tergites with regular sparse and very short setae. Habitus as in +Fig. 56 +. + + +Head small, transverse ( +Fig. 16 +), 1.7 times as wide as long; middle portion slightly elevated, with distinct semicircular impression between eyes, with distinct, deep, short or more or less long grooves in front of ocelli, reaching middle or anterior third of eye; surface between punctures on laterobasal portion of infraorbital ridges slightly and irregularly elevated; postocular ridge small, smooth or somewhat acute; anterior portion between antennal insertion and anterior margin of eye with indistinct semicircular notch. Eyes large, convex. Ocelli moderately large, situated at level of postocular ridges; distance between ocelli slightly longer than distance between ocellus and posterior margin of eye. Labrum small, with widely rounded membranous latero-apical portions, deep apical emargination and elongate basolateral projections ( +Fig. 4 +). Mandibles short, moderately narrow, with distinct small tooth in middle of right mandible ( +Fig. 7 +). Submentum and labium narrow, with very transverse preapical labial palpomeres ( +Fig. 13 +). Apical segment of maxillary palp slightly more than twice as long as preceding segment; galea and lacinia moderately wide ( +Fig. 10 +). Gular sutures with shortest distance between posterior third of eyes ( +Fig. 16 +). Antenna exceeding shoulders of elytra when reclined; length × width of antennomeres ( +holotype +): 1: 0.14 × 0.07; 2: 0.11 × 0.06; 3–6: 0.10 × 0.05; 7–8: 0.10 × 0.05; 9–10: 0.08 × 0.05; 11: 0.16 × 0.06. + + + +FIGURES 56–59. +Habitus of species of + +Anthobium crassum + +-group: 56— + +A. crassum + +(holotype), 57— + +A +. +crenulatum + +(holotype), 58— + +A. explanatum + +(holotype), 59— + +A. farkaci + +(holotype). Scale bar: 1.0 mm. + + + +Pronotum transverse, about twice as wide as long, 1.6–1.8 times as wide as head, widest at about middle, evenly narrowed both anteriad and posteriad; apical margin distinctly narrower than posterior margin; anterior angles somewhat rounded, strongly protruded anteriad; posterior angles acute; basal margin of pronotum widely rounded ( +Fig. 19 +); lateral margins of pronotum with four irregular, tooth-shaped projections (indistinct in some +paratypes +), and additional irregular, small lateral crenulation on edges; pronotum with wide elevated middle portion, usually with wide and deep longitudinal impression (indistinct in some specimens), with indistinct or distinct, moderately deep semioval impression on mediobasal third; lateral portions moderately wide and distinctly explanate, each with very deep oval pit approximately in the middle. Prothorax ( +Fig. 19 +) with moderately short intercoxal process and narrow protruded mesosternal processes. Mesothorax ( +Fig. 28 +) with acute intercoxal process, reaching posterior margin of mesocoxae. Scutellum ( +Fig. 22 +) with somewhat acute apex. Metathorax as in +Fig. 31 +. Metendosternite as in +Fig. 34 +. + + +Elytra very convex, relatively short, slightly widened posteriad, about as long as combined wide, reaching basal margin of abdominal tergite VI to VII, with slightly rounded apical margins, truncated at suture; shoulders of elytra widely rounded, not protruded anteriad ( +Fig. 25 +); lateral portions of elytra moderately narrow, slightly explanated, latero-apical margins with small, irregular crenulation; surface of each elytron usually with indistinct transverse elevations between punctures in parascutellar portion; some +paratypes +with indistinct longitudinal impression in mediobasal third along suture. Wings fully developed. + +Legs moderately long and slender, tibiae covered by elongate regular setae, with a few strong setae on apical margins near apex; metatarsus distinctly less than twice as long as metatibia. +Abdomen distinctly narrower than elytra, with a pair of small round tomentose wing-folding spots in middle of tergite V; apical margin of abdominal tergite VII with narrow palisade fringe. + +Male. Protarsomeres 1–4 slightly widened. Apical margins of abdominal tergite VIII ( +Fig. 37 +) and sternite VIII ( +Fig. 40 +) slightly emarginate. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 60 +) with wide basal portion, gradually narrowed toward rounded apex, with long sclerotized dorsal plate; parameres moderately narrow, long, distinctly exceeding apex of median lobe, with two small apical and preapical setae; internal sac narrow and very long, spirally rolled in basal portion. Aedeagus laterally as in +Fig. 61 +. + + +Female. Protarsomeres 1–4 moderately narrow. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII straight ( +Fig. 43 +). Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII rounded ( +Fig. 46 +). Genital segment as in +Fig. 49 +. + + +Comparative notes. +Based on the coloration, punctation, shape of the pronotum and general structure of the aedeagus, + +A. crassum + + +sp.n. + +is most similar to + +A. crenulatum + + +sp.n. + +, from which it differs by the smaller body, shorter, slightly widened elytra, narrower aedeagus, with shorter parameres and different internal structures. + + + + +Distribution. +The species is known from several locations ( +Fig. 64 +) in Xue Shan and Haba Shan ranges in +Yunnan +, +China +. + + +Bionomics. +Specimens were collected at elevations from +3700 to 4114 m +a.s.l. The specimens were taken by sifting +rhododendron +leaf litter, other leaf litter with humus under it and various floor debris in an original mixed + +Abies + +, + +Betula + +, tree-like rhododendrons, + +Ulmus + +forest with lush deciduous undergrowth (C36), by sifting of needles and various debris under piles of branches of last year cut down + +Abies + +trees in remnant of an original + +Abies + +, + +Betula + +, + +Rhododendron + +forest (C161) and fallen leaves and debris under tree-like rhododendrons (C40), by sifting of rotting wood, humus and leaf litter, mostly with mushrooms in various stages of development, in an original + +Abies + +, + +Betula + +and + +Rhododendron + +forest with deciduous shrubbery undergrowth (C129). Some specimens were sifted from leaf litter and dead wood in devastated mixed forests, meadows near border of a lake (locality: C2005-05A ( +Figs. 65–66 +)). + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet is the Latin adjective +crassus +, - +a +, - +um +(robust, strong). It refers to the robust body of the species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA4FFEAFF5B64B3FD1EFE1E.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA4FFEAFF5B64B3FD1EFE1E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..554df34bfaa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA4FFEAFF5B64B3FD1EFE1E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + + +Anthobium explanatum +Shavrin & Smetana + +, +sp.n. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 58 +, +64 +, +69–70 +) + + + + +Type material examined: + +Holotype +♂ +: ‘P.R. +CHINA +, +Sichuan +, | E slope +Gongga Shan +, | +N29°34’31’’ E102°00’ +| 31’’, + +23.vi.2011 + +, 2832m | sift26, +V.Grebennikov’ +<rectangular label, printed + +>, ‘ + +HOLOTYPE +| +Anthobium +| explanatum + +sp.n. + +| +Shavrin A. +& +Smetana A. +2017’ <red rectangulat label, printed> ( +NSMT +) + +. + + + +Paratype +♀ +: same data as the holotype, with additional red rectangular printed label + +‘ + +PARATYPE +| +Anthobium +| explanatum + +sp.n. + +| +Shavrin A.V. +& +Smetana A. +2018’ ( +CS +) + +. + + + + +Description +. Measurements (n=2): HW: 0.72; HL: 0.42; AL: 1.33; OL: 0.15; PL: 0.57; PW: 1.40; ESL: 1.42– 1.52; EW: 1.67–1.76; AW: 1.25–1.28; MTbL ( +holotype +): 0.62, MTrL ( +holotype +): 0.29 (MTrL 1–4: 0.17; MTrL 5: 0.12); AedL: 0.62; TL: 3.20–3.27 ( +holotype +). + + +Body and antennomeres 6–11 yellow-brown, with somewhat darker head; mouthparts, antennomeres 1–5, lateral sides of pronotum and elytra, legs and apical tergites of abdomen yellow. Middle portion of head with irregular, fine, sparse punctation, with moderately wide transverse impunctate portions between grooves in front of ocelli, punctation markedly denser and deeper on laterobasal portions between ocelli and eyes, infraorbital ridges with markedly larger, denser and deeper, irregular punctation, with some punctures merging each other; pronotum with moderately dense, deep punctation, markedly larger than that on middle of head, denser on medioapical portion, sparser and finer on mediobasal, and sparser and deeper on lateral portions; scutellum with several very fine punctures; punctation of elytra dense, slightly larger and deeper than that on pronotum in middle, sparser and finer on parascutellar and medioapical portions, distinctly sparser on lateral portions, each elytron along suture bearing three very vague and tangled longitudinal rows of moderately fine punctures; abdominal tergites with very indistinct and sparse fine punctation. Habitus as in +Fig. 58 +. + + +Head 1.7 times as wide as long; middle portion of head with distinct, wide triangular impression between eyes at posterior third, with indistinct grooves in front of ocelli, reaching posterior part of eye, and with distinct, narrow transverse impression between ocelli; lateral parts of head with moderately wide surface between acute postocular ridge and posterior margin of eye as long as three nearest combined ommatidia; anterior portion between antennal insertion and anterior margin of eye with wide, indistinct semicircular notch. Ocelli large, situated slightly behind of level of postocular ridges. Antenna moderately long, reaching one-fourth of elytra when reclined; length × width of antennomeres ( +holotype +): 1: 0.16 × 0.07; 2: 0.12 × 0.06; 3: 0.13 × 0.05; 4: 0.11 × 0.05; 5–7: 0.12 × 0.06; 8: 0.11 × 0.06; 9: 0.10 × 0.07; 10: 0.09 × 0.07; 11: 0.15 × 0.08. + + +Pronotum markedly more than twice as wide as long, about twice as wide as head, widest in middle; anterior angles widely rounded, strongly protruded anteriad; posterior angles acute; lateral margins with three to four irregular, tooth-shaped projections, markedly stronger than those in + +A. crassum + + +sp.n. + +, and with additional very small flattened lateral crenulation on edges; middle portion wide and distinctly elevated, with indistinct longitudinal impression, and very deep semioval impression on mediobasal third; lateral portions very wide and explanate, each with very deep and large oval pit in the middle. + +Elytra with convex middle portion, combined about as wide as long, slightly or distinctly more than twice as long as pronotum, markedly widened apicad from middle, reaching middle of abdominal tergite V or VI, with somewhat straight apical margins; shoulders wide, indistinctly protruded anteriad; flattened lateral portions of elytra markedly explanate, very wide, about twice as wide as convex middle portion, latero-apical margins with moderately large acute crenulation, more flattened and reduced in middle; middle portion of each elytron with two to three very indistinct longitudinal elevations between punctures, more visible in basal half. Wings very short. +Abdomen with very indistinct small round tomentose wing-folding spots in about middle of tergite V. + +Male. Apical margins of abdominal tergite VIII and sternite VIII slightly emarginated. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 69 +) narrow, with widely truncate apex of median lobe; parameres very long, narrow, markedly exceeding apex of median lobe, with two small apical and preapical setae; internal sac narrow and moderately long. Aedeagus laterally as in +Fig. 70 +. + + + +FIGURE 64. +Distribution of + +Anthobium crassum + +(black circles), + +A. crenulatum + +(black square), + +A. explanatum + +(black rhomb), and + +A. farkaci + +(black triangle) in the south-western China. + + +Female. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII straight. Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII rounded. + +Comparative notes. + +Anthobium explanatum + + +sp.n. + +differs from the remaining species of the + +crassum + +-group by the paler coloration, by the strong tooth-shaped projections on lateral margins of the pronotum, by the very wide lateral portions of short elytra, as well as by external and internal characters of the aedeagus. + + + + +Distribution. +The species is known only from the +type +locality in Gongga Shan range in +Sichuan +, +China +( +Fig. 64 +). + + +Bionomics. +All specimens were taken by sifting forest litter at elevation +2832 m +a.s.l. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet is the Latin adjective +explanatus +, - +a +, - +um +(widened). It refers to the markedly widened pronotum and elytra of the species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA6FFF4FF5B679BFC97FA9A.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA6FFF4FF5B679BFC97FA9A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f1f617a19d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA6FFF4FF5B679BFC97FA9A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,230 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + + +Anthobium crenulatum +Shavrin & Smetana + +, +sp.n. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 57 +, +62–64 +, +67 +) + + + + +Type material examined: + +Holotype +♂ +[dissected]: ‘ +CHINA +: +Yunnan + + +[ +CH +07-02A], | Dali Bai Auton. Pref., +Diacang Shan W +| +Dali +, +25°41’20’’N +, +100°06’12’’E +| + +3160 m + +, small creek valley, litter and | debris sifted, + +28.V.2007 + +, +M. Schülke’ +<rectangular label, printed + +>, ‘ + +HOLOTYPE +| +Anthobium +| crenulatum + +sp.n. + +| +Shavrin A.V. +& +Smetana A. +2018’ <red rectangular label, printed> ( +CSC +) + +. + + + + +Description +. Measurements of the +holotype +: HW: 0.77; HL: 0.45; AL: 1.49; OL: 0.18; PL: 0.57; PW: 1.27; ESL: 1.52; EW: 1.55; AW: 1.50; MTbL: 0.80; MTrL: 0.35 (MTrL 1–4: 0.20; MTrL 5: 0.15); AedL: 0.72; TL: 3.40. + + + +FIGURES 60–63. +Aedeagus of + +Anthobium crassum + +(60–61: paratype) and + +A. crenulatum + +(62–63: holotype): 60, 62—parameral view, 61, 63—lateral view. Scale bar: 0.1 mm. + + + +Body and antennomeres 6–11 reddish-brown, with mouthparts, antennomeres 1–5, lateral portions of pronotum, legs and apical tergites of abdomen yellow-brown. Head with irregular fine punctation, denser between grooves and infraorbital ridges, with narrow transverse impunctated portion in middle; neck with fine irregular punctures; pronotum with very dense punctation, markedly larger and deeper than that on head, with merging punctures on medioapical third, slightly sparser on lateral portions, with wide impunctated area after the middle of disc; punctation of elytra as that on pronotum, but slightly larger, somewhat finer on parascutellar portion, each elytron forming six very vague and tangled longitudinal rows of punctures. Habitus as in +Fig. 57 +. + +Middle portion of head and infraorbital ridges slightly elevated, with indistinct semicircular impression between eyes at posterior third, with indistinct short grooves in front of ocelli, reaching posterior margin of eye; surface between punctures in middle transversely and in infraorbital ridges irregularly, diagonally elevated; postocular ridge smooth; anterior portion between antennal insertion and anterior margin of eye with distinct, wide semicircular notch. Ocelli situated at level slightly behind of postocular ridges; distance between ocelli about as distance between ocellus and posterior margin of eye. Length × width of antennomeres: 1: 0.21 × 0.07; 2: 0.12 × 0.06; 3: 0.13 × 0.07; 4: 0.12 × 0.07; 5–8: 0.13 × 0.07; 9: 0.12 × 0.07; 10: 0.11 × 0.07; 11: 0.16 × 0.07. + +Pronotum distinctly more than twice as wide as long, 1.6 times as wide as head, widest in middle; lateral margins with four distinct, irregular projections similar to that in + +A. crassum + + +sp.n. + +; middle portion with indistinct longitudinal and mediobasal portion with deep semicircular impressions; lateral portions wide and markedly explanate. + +Elytra subparallel-sided, long, longer than combined wide, reaching basal margin of abdominal tergite V; surface of each elytron with diagonal distinct elevations between punctures on parascutellar portion and with indistinct longitudinal impression on mediobasal third along suture. + +Male. Apical margins of abdominal tergite VIII and sternite VIII slightly emarginated. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 62 +) with wide median lobe, gradually narrowed toward truncated apex; pararameres short, widened apically, with two small apical and preapical setae; internal sac very long, narrow in apical and markedly wide in basal portion. Aedeagus laterally as in +Fig. 63 +. + +Female unknown. + +Comparative notes. +Based on the coloration, punctation, shape of the pronotum and general structure of the aedeagus, + +A. crenulatum + + +sp.n. + +is similar to + +A. crassum + + +sp.n. + +, from which it can be distinguished by larger body, shorter elytra, and details of the external and internal characters of the aedeagus. + + + + +Distribution. +The species is known only from the +type +locality in Diacang Shan range in +Yunnan +, +China +( +Fig. 64 +). + + +Bionomics. +The +holotype +was collected at elevation +3160 m +a.s.l. by sifting of litter and debris along a small creek ( +CH +07-02A: +Fig. 67 +). + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet is the Latin adjective +crenulatus +,- +a. -um +(crenulate). It refers to the markedly crenulate lateral margins of the pronotum of the species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA8FFF2FF5B60C6FF56FDD6.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA8FFF2FF5B60C6FF56FDD6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9f86ca194be --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA8FFF2FF5B60C6FF56FDD6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,656 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + + +Anthobium consanguineum +Shavrin & Smetana + +, +sp.n. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 1 +, +3, 6, 9, 12 +, +15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33 +, +36, 39, 42, 45 +, 48, 51–52, 55) + + + + +Type material examined: + +Holotype +♂ +: ‘ +CHINA +: +Yunnan + + +[ +CH +07-24], +Nujiang +| +Lisu Aut.Pref. +, +Gaoligong Shan +, valley 18 | km W +Gongshan +, + +3020 m + +, +27°47’54’’N +, | +98°30’13’’E +, mixed forest, litter, moss, | wood sifted, + +7. +VI + + +.2007, M. Schülke’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘ + +HOLOTYPE +| +Anthobium +| consanguineum + +sp.n. + +| +Shavrin A.V. +& Smetana A. 2019’ <red rectangulat label, printed> ( +CSC +) + +. + + + +Paratypes + +( +24 specimens +): +4 ♂♂ +[two specimens dissected], + +5 ♀♀ +[one specimen dissected]: same data as the holotype ( +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +: +CS +: +2 ♂♂ +, +3 ♀♀ +: CSC; +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +: +NSMT +) + +; + +1 ♂ +[dissected]: ‘ +CHINA +( +Yunnan +) | +Dali Bai Auton Pref. +, | +Diancang Shan +W +Dali +| +25°41’20’’N +100°06’12’’E +| + +3160 m + +(small creek valley, | litter and debris sifted | + +27.V.2007 + +D.W. Wrase +[02]’ ( +CS +) + +; + +2 ♂♂ +[one specimen dissected]: ‘ +CHINA +: N-Yunnan +Nujiang Lisu +| +Aut.Pr.Gongshan Co. +Gaoligong | +Shan +, valley at + +3000-3050 m + +| +27°47.90’N +98°30.19’E +| + + +21. +VI +.2005 + + +A. Smetana +[C169]’ ( +CS +, +NSMT +) + +; + +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +: ‘ +CHINA +: N-Yunnan [C + +2005-16 + +] | +Nujiang Lisu Aut.Pref. +, +Gongshan Co. +, | Gaoli- gong +Shan +, sidevalley, | + +3000-3050 m + +, +27°47.90’N +, +98°30.19’E’ +<rectangular label, printed>, ‘conif[erous]. forest with + +Rhododendron + +, broad | leaved bushes, litter, moss, dead wood | sifted along creek and snowfields, | + + +21. +VI +.2005 + + +, +M. Schülke +[C + +2005-16 + +]’ <rectangular label, printed> ( +CSC +) + +; +10 ♂♂ +[two specimens dissected], + +4 ♀♀ +: ‘ +CHINA +: +Yunnan +[CH07-21], | +Nujiang Lisu Aut. Pref. +, +Gaoligong Shan +, | pass + +22 km +W Gongshan + +, N slope, 3350- | + +3400 m + +, +27°46’27’’N +, +98°26’50’’E +, fern, | moss, litter, sifted, + + +6. +VI +.2007 + + +, M. +Schülke’ +<rectangular label, printed>, ( +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +: +CS +; +7 ♂♂ +, +2 ♀♀ +: CSC; +2 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +: +NSMT +). +All +paratypes +with additional red rectangular printed label + +: ‘ +PARATYPE +| +Anthobium +| consanguineum + +sp.n. + +| Shavrin A.V. & Smetana A. 2019’. + + +One female was not included in the type series, it was dissected and used for the preparing of figures of the body parts: same data as the +holotype +( +CS +). + + + + +Description +. Measurements (n=25): HW: 0.66–0.74; HL: 0.42–0.43; AL ( +holotype +): 2.20; OL: 0.15–0.17; PL: 0.50–0.61; PW: 1.01–1.17; ESL: 1.39–1.42; EW: 1.30–1.46; AW: 0.97–1.04; MTbL: 0.67; MTrL: 0.27 (MTrL 1–4: 0.17; MTrL 5: 0.10); AedL: 0.42–0.54; TL: 2.65–3.40 ( +holotype +: 3.07). + + +Body small, subparallel-sided, convex. Head, antennomeres 5–11 (or sometimes 4–11) and apical segment of maxillary palp brown; pronotum, elytra and abdomen yellow-brown to reddish-brown; legs and mouthparts yellow. Body shiny; body without microsculpture except for abdomen with distinct transverse meshes. Head with fine and deep punctation, markedly denser on infraorbital ridges, sometimes with transverse impunctate portions in middle at level of eyes and/or between ocelli; middle part of neck with sparse, fine punctation; pronotum with dense punctation, markedly coarser than that on head, somewhat finer in basal and apical portions, and sparser in mediobasal third and laterobasal portion, sometimes with impunctate mediobasal area; scutellum without punctures; punctation of elytra similar to that of pronotum, finer and sometimes coarser in parascutellar portion, usually finer along suture, each elytron bearing six to seven very vague and tangled longitudinal rows of punctures; abdominal tergites with very small, moderately dense, indistinct punctation. Body glabrous, clypeus with several semierect tactile setae, sometimes middle portion of head between eyes with two short erect setae; lateral margins of pronotum with several very thin and short setae; abdominal tergites with irregular, very sparse and short setae. Habitus as in +Fig. 1 +. + + +Head moderately large ( +Fig. 15 +), 1.5–1.7 times as wide as long; middle portion slightly elevated, usually with two indistinct transverse impressions between eyes, with distinct, deep, short grooves in front of ocelli, and with narrow irregular impression between ocelli; postocular ridge distinct, acute, with surface between postocular ridge and posterior margin of eye as long as the two or three nearest combined ommatidia; anterior portion between antennal insertion and anterior margin of eye with small, distinct semicircular notch. Eyes large, convex. Ocelli large, situated at about level of postocular ridges; distance between ocelli slightly longer than distance between ocellus and posterior margin of eye. Labrum with widely rounded latero-apical portions, deep medioapical emargination, and with elongate basolateral projections ( +Fig. 3 +). Mandibles moderately short and wide, with small tooth near apex of right mandible ( +Fig. 6 +). Submentum and labium narrow, with markedly transverse preapical labial palpomeres ( +Fig. 12 +). Apical segment of maxillary palpus more than twice as long as preceding segment; galea widened in apical portion; lacinia moderately short, with several preapical teeth ( +Fig. 9 +). Gular sutures with shortest distance slightly behind level of posterior margins of eyes ( +Fig. 15 +). Antenna moderately short, exceeding apical fourth of elytra when reclined; length × width of antennomeres ( +holotype +): 1: 0.13 × 0.06; 2: 0.11 × 0.03; 3: 0.11 × 0.02; 4: 0.11 × 0.03; 5–6: 0.11 × 0.04; 7: 0.11 × 0.05; 8: 0.09 × 0.05; 9: 0.09 × 0.06; 10: 0.08 × 0.06; 11: 0.15 × 0.07. + + +Pronotum transverse, about twice or slightly more than twice as wide as long, 1.5 times as wide as head, widest slightly anterior to, or at about middle, slightly more narrowed posteriad than anteriad; apical margin markedly rounded, distinctly narrower than posterior margin; anterior angles widely rounded, indistinctly protruded anteriad; posterior angles more or less obtuse; lateral edges of pronotum with indistinct flattened crenulation; pronotum with very wide elevated middle portion, with indistinct short longitudinal impression at medioapical third (invisible in some +paratypes +), with small, indistinct to distinct semioval impression on mediobasal third; lateral portions moderately wide, slightly explanate, each with small deep pit approximately in the middle. Prothorax ( +Fig. 18 +) with long, narrow intercoxal process and strongly protruded mesosternal processes. Mesothorax ( +Fig. 27 +) with acute, long intercoxal process, reaching posterior margin of mesocoxae. Scutellum ( +Fig. 21 +) with widely rounded apex. Metathorax as in +Fig. 30 +. Metendosternite as in +Fig. 33 +. + + +Elytra convex, slightly longer than wide, markedly more than twice as long as pronotum, slightly widened in middle, reaching apical margin of abdominal tergites IV to VI, with widely rounded apical margins, truncate at suture; shoulders of elytra rounded, not protruding anteriad ( +Fig. 24 +); lateral portions of elytra narrow, slightly explanate, latero-apical margins with indistinct, small, irregular crenulation; surface of each elytron without elevations, but some +paratypes +with very indistinct longitudinal elevations between punctures in middle. Wings fully developed. + + + +FIGURES 1–2. +Habitus of species of + +Anthobium consanguineum + +-group: 1— + +A. consanguineum + +(holotype), 2— + +A. jaegeri + +(holotype). Scale bar: 1.0 mm. + + +Legs moderately long and slender; mesotibiae covered by elongate setae; metatarsus short, markedly more than twice as long as metatibia. +Abdomen markedly narrower than elytra, with a pair of small transverse tomentose wing-folding spots in middle of tergite V; apical margin of abdominal tergite VII with fine palisade fringe. + +Male. Protarsomeres 1–4 distinctly widened. Apical margins of abdominal tergite VIII ( +Fig. 36 +) and sternite VIII ( +Fig. 39 +) slightly sinuate. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 51 +) moderately wide, with widely truncate apex; parameres narrow, curved in apical portion, distinctly exceeding apex of median lobe, with two long apical setae; internal sac wide and moderately long, spirally rolled in basal portion. Aedeagus laterally as in +Fig. 52 +. + + +Female. Protarsomeres 1–4 narrow. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII ( +Fig. 42 +) straight. Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII ( +Fig. 45 +) widely rounded. Genital segment as in +Fig. 48 +. + + +Comparative notes. +Based on the coloration, general shape of the elytra and aedeagus, + +A. consanguineum + + +sp.n. + +is similar to Himalayan + +A. jaegeri + + +sp.n. + +, from which it differs by the markedly wider pronotum and details of both internal and external characters of the aedeagus. + + + + +FIGURES 3–14. +Mouthparts (dorsal view) of + +Anthobium + +(3, 6, 9, 12— + +A +. +consanguineum + +, 4, 7, 10, 13— + +A +. +crassum + +, 5, 8, 11, 14— + +A +. +reflexum + +): 3–5—labrum, 6–8—mandibles (left and right), 9–11—maxilla (right), 12–14—labium and submentum. Scale bar: +0.1 mm +. + + + + +FIGURES 15–35. +Body parts of + +Anthobium + +(15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33— + +A +. +consanguineum + +, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34— + +A +. +crassum + +, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 32, 35— + +A +. +reflexum + +): 15–17—ventral aspect of head, 18–20—ventral aspect of prothorax, 21–23— scutellum (dorsal view), 24–26—ventral aspect of elytron, 27–29—ventral aspect of mesothorax, 30–32—ventral aspect of metathorax (without metanepisternum), 33–35—metendosternite (ventral view). Scale bar: +0.1 mm +. + + + + +FIGURES 36–47. +Abdominal segments of + +Anthobium + +(36, 39, 42, 45, 48— + +A +. +consanguineum + +, 37, 40, 43, 46, 49— + +A +. +crassum + +, 38, 41, 44, 47, 50— + +A +. +reflexum + +): 36–38—male tergite VIII (dorsal view), 39–41—male sternite VIII (ventral view), 42–44—female tergite VIII (dorsal view), 45–47—female sternite VIII (ventral view). Scale bar: +0.1 mm +. + + + + +FIGURES 48–50. +Female genital segment (dorsal view) of + +Anthobium + +: 48– + +A +. +consanguineum + +, 49— + +A +. +crassum + +, 50— + +A +. +reflexum + +. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. + + + + +Distribution. +The species is known from several localities in the Gaoligong Shan and Diancang Shan ranges in +Yunnan +, +China +( +Fig. 55 +). + + + +FIGURES 51–54. +Aedeagus of + +Anthobium consanguineum + +(51–52: paratype) and + +A. jaegeri + +(53–54: holotype): 51, 53—parameral view, 52, 54—lateral view. Scale bar: 0.1 mm. + + + +Bionomics. +Specimens were collected at elevations from +3000 to 3400 m +a.s.l. The specimens were taken by sifting litter, mosses, and debris in broadleaved bushes, forests with + +Rhododendron + +; some specimens were taken by sifting from leaf litter, moss and various debris under +rhododendron +and various broadleaved shrubs near small creeks and snowfields (locality: C169). Ten specimens (locality: +CH +07-24) were collected together with + +A. latissimum +Shavrin & Smetana, 2018 + +(for a photograph of the +type +locality of this species see in Shavrin & Smetana (2018: +Fig. 73 +)); +14 specimens +(locality: +CH +07-21) were collected together with + +A. splendidulum +Shavrin & Smetana, 2018 + +(for a photograph of the +type +locality of this species see in Shavrin & Smetana (2018: Fig. 93)); two specimens (locality: C +2005-16 +) were collected together with + +Mannerheimia grandilobata +Shavrin, 2018 + +(for a photograph of the +type +locality of this species see in Shavrin (2018: +Fig. 11 +). + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet (Latin adjective: related) refers to the similarity of this species to + +A. jaegeri + + +sp.n. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA8FFF8FF5B6180FA04FE86.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA8FFF8FF5B6180FA04FE86.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f90321e00ff --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFA8FFF8FF5B6180FA04FE86.xml @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + +Key to the species of the + +consanguineum + +group + + + + + + + + +1 Pronotum transverse, about twice or slightly more than twice as wide as long. Median lobe wide, apical portion of each paramere curved ( +Fig. 51 +). Body length: +2.65–3.40 mm +. Habitus as in +Fig. 1 +. +China +( +Yunnan +)............ + +A. consanguineum + + +sp.n. + + + + + +- Pronotum subrectangular, one and a half times as wide as long. Median lobe narrower, apical portion of each paramere straight ( +Fig. 53 +). Body length: +2.76 mm +. Habitus as in +Fig. 2 +. +Nepal +........................................ + +A. jaegeri + + +sp.n. + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB0FFE1FF5B606BFD44FDAE.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB0FFE1FF5B606BFD44FDAE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9a495035e5e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB0FFE1FF5B606BFD44FDAE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + + +Anthobium kashmiricum +( +Cameron, 1941 +) + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 76 +, +80–82 +) + + + + + + +Lathrimaeum +( +Prionothorax +) +kashmiricum + +Cameron, 1941: 58 + + + + + + + +Anthobium kashmiricum +: + +Herman, 2001: 233 + + + + + + + +Anthobium +( +Prionothorax +) +kashmiricum +: Smetana, 2001: 239 + +; + +Schülke & Smetana, 2015: 307 + + + + + + +Type material examined: +Holotype +by monotypy (“Type in my collection”) of + +Lathrimaeum kashmiricum +Cameron, 1941 + +[specimen was dissected and reglued on a new plate; old plate under a new; aedeagus in small vial with glycerine is pinned under old plate; abdominal tergite VIII, sternite VIII and apical segment was glued on the same plate under the specimen; left hind tarsus is glued under hind leg; additional barcode label: ‘ +NHMUK +013684152’] +♂ +: ‘SYN- | TYPE’ <round printed label with blue margin>, ‘Type’ <round printed label with red margin>, ‘Kashmir | Gulmarg | vi-vii-31 | Dr. Cameron’ <rectangular printed label>, ‘M.Cameron | Bequest. | B.M. 1955-147.’ <rectangular printed label>, ‘L. | kashmiricum | +TYPE +[in red] Cam.’ <rectangular label, handwritten in black Indian ink>, ‘ + +Anthobium + +| + +kashmiricum +( +Cameron, 1941 +) + +| Shavrin A. +V. 2016 +’ ( +BMNH +). + + +Additional material. + + +INDIA +: KASHMIR: + +3 ♂♂ +, +3 ♀♀ +: ‘SYN- | TYPE’ <round printed label with blue margin>, +Kashmir +| +Gulmarg +| vi-vii-31 | +Dr. Cameron’ +<rectangular printed label>, ‘ +M.Cameron +| Bequest. | B.M. 1955-147.’ <rectangular printed label> ( +BMNH +); +2 ♂♂ +, +1 ♀ +: ‘ +Kashmir +| +Gulmarg +| vi-vii-31 | +Dr. Cameron’ +<handwritten in black +Indian +ink>, ‘ +W. Steel +coll. | B.M. 1969-552’ <rectangular printed label>, ‘SYN- | TYPE’ <round printed label with blue margin> ( +BMNH +) + +. + + + + +Redescription. +Measurements (n=10): HW: 0.79–0.80, HL: 0.45–0.50; AL( +holotype +): + +1.82; OL: 0.20; +PL +: 0.60–0.70; +PW +: 1.25–1.45; +ESL +: 1.50; EW: 1.60–1.85; AW: 1.50–1.60; MTbL( +holotype +) + +: 0.85, MTrL( +holotype +): 0.35 (MTrL 1–4: 0.25; MTrL 5: 0.10); AedL: 0.50; TL: 3.70( +holotype +)–4.45. + + +Body and antennomeres 4–11 (or 5–11) yellow-brown to brown, sometimes with head and bottom of elytral punctures dark-brown; lateral portions of pronotum yellow to yellow-brown; mouthparts, antennomeres 1–3 (or 1–4) and legs yellow ( +holotype +markedly paler than other studied specimens). Head with irregular and indistinct, transverse meshes in middle of vertex, posterior portions of infraorbital ridges with rugose sculpture between punctures, middle part of neck and abdomen with isodiametric microsculpture. Head with irregular and dense punctation, markedly denser in middle portion, punctation of posterior portions of infraorbital ridges denser, with interspaces between punctures as diameter of one puncture, middle part of head behind transverse impression with narrow triangular impunctate area; pronotum with irregular, very dense and somewhat larger punctation than that on posterior part of head, more rugose in middle elevation and distinctly sparser on lateral portions; scutellum with several fine punctures; punctation of elytra as that on pronotum but sparser, middle portions of each elytron with vague and tangled six rows of longitudinal punctures, finer and more tangled in prescutellar area; abdominal tergites with regular, sparse and fine punctation. Habitus as in +Fig. 76 +. + + +Head 1.6–1.7 times as wide as long; middle part irregularly elevated, with distinct and moderately deep transverse impression, with long grooves in front of ocelli, stretching toward level of posterior third of eyes; middle part of head sometimes with indistinct transverse elevations between punctures; postocular ridges acute. Distance between ocelli slightly longer than distance between ocellus and posterior margin of eye. Antenna long, reaching apical fourth of elytra when reclined; length × width of antennomeres ( +holotype +): 1: 0.22 × 0.10; 2: 0.15 × 0.05; 3–6: 0.17 × 0.04; 7: 0.17 × 0.06; 8: 0.15 × 0.06; 9: 0.15 × 0.07; 10: 0.13 × 0.08; 11: 0.17 × 0.08. + +Pronotum 1.5–1.8 times as wide as head, widest about middle, indistinctly narrowed anteriad and slightly more narrowed posteriad; anterior angles rounded, strongly protruded anteriad; lateral margins of pronotum with irregular, indistinct crenulation; middle portion with wide longitudinal impression in middle and distinct transverse impression in mediobasal third; lateral portions moderately wide, explanate. +Elytra wider than long, markedly more than twice as long as pronotum, slightly widened posteriad from middle; lateral portions wide and explanate; surface of each elytron usually with five longitudinal elevations between punc- tures in middle, with more distinct longitudinal elevation, diagonally stretching from shoulders to posterior fourth of elytra. + +Male. Protarsomeres 1–4 slightly widened. Apical margins of abdominal tergite VIII and sternite VIII straight emarginated. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 80 +) small, suboval, with median lobe narrowing toward narrowly rounded apex; parameres short, slightly widened apically, hardly exceeding apex of median lobe, with two pairs of apical and preapical setae; internal sac narrow, long, spirally rolled in basal portion. Aedeagus laterally as in +Fig. 81 +. + +Female. Protarsomeres 1–4 narrow. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII emarginated. Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII widely rounded. + +Comparative notes. +Based on the body size and the length of the elytra, + +A. kashmiricum + +is similar to + +A +. +deplanatum + + +sp.n. + +, from which it can be distinguished by the paler coloration, shape of the anterior angles of the pronotum, and by the external and internal characters of the aedeagus. + + + + +Distribution. +The species is known only from the +type +locality in Kashmir, +India +( +Fig. 82 +). + + +Bionomics. +Any bionomical data are unknown. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB1FFE7FF5B63E8FDBDFC92.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB1FFE7FF5B63E8FDBDFC92.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1a492435fb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB1FFE7FF5B63E8FDBDFC92.xml @@ -0,0 +1,277 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + + +Anthobium transversale +Shavrin & Smetana + +, +sp.n. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 77 +, +87–89 +) + + + + +Type material examined: + +Holotype +♂ +: ‘ +CHINA +Sichuan +, +Gongga +| +Shan +, +Hailuogou +, above | +Camp +3, + +3000m + + +6.VII.96 + +| +29°35N +102°00E +C53’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘collected by | +A. Smetana +, +J. Farkač +| and +P. Kabátek’ +<rectangular label, printed + +>, ‘ + +HOLOTYPE +| +Anthobium +| transversale + +sp.n. + +| +Shavrin A.V. +& +Smetana A. +2018’ <red rectangular label, printed> ( +NSMT +) + +. + + +Paratypes +( +4 specimens +): +2 ♂♂ +[one specimen dissected], +2 ♀♀ +: +same data as the holotype, with additional red rectangular printed label +: ‘ + +PARATYPE +| +Anthobium +| transversale + +sp.n. + +| +Shavrin A.V. +& +Smetana A. +2018’ ( +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +: +NSMT +; +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +: +CS +) + +. + + + + +Description +. Measurements (n=5): HW: 0.75–0.80; HL: 0.42–0.45; AL( +holotype +): 1.41; OL: 0.20–0.22; PL: 0.57–0.65;PW:1.17–1.27; ESL:1.20–1.66;EW:1.67–1.71;AW:1.43–1.53; MTbL( +holotype +):0.82;MTrL( +holotype +): 0.34 (MTrL 1–4: 0.19; MTrL 5: 0.15); AedL: 0.65; TL: 3.12–3.47( +holotype +: 3.45). + + +Head, pronotum, abdomen and antennomeres 4–11 reddish-brown to brown; lateral and basal portions of pronotum and elytra yellow-brown (one +paratype +with brown elytra); mouthparts, antennomeres 1–3 and legs yellow. Forebody without microsculpture except for posterior portion of infraorbital ridges and lateral portions of neck with distinct transverse meshes; abdomen with distinct isodiametric microsculpture. Head with fine and deep punctation, markedly denser and deeper on infraorbital ridges; neck with fine and sparse punctation; pronotum with fine, moderately deep punctation, finer and sparser in middle and larger and deeper on lateral portions (some +paratypes +with denser and deeper punctation on medioapical portion), usually with small impunctated area on mediobasal third; scutellum with several fine punctures; punctation of elytra as that in pronotum, finer and denser in prescutellar area, each elytron bearing indistinct six to seven vague and tangled longitudinal rows of punctures; abdominal tergites with indistinct, fine and dense punctation, Habitus as in +Fig. 77 +. + + +Head 1.7 times as wide as long; middle portion slightly elevated, with wide triangular or semicircular impression at level of posterior third of eyes between narrow and deep grooves in front of ocelli, almost reaching level of midlength of eyes; surface between punctures on infraorbital ridges slightly elevated; postocular ridges acute; anterior portion between antennal insertion and anterior nargin of eye with distinct, wide, semicircular notch. Distance between ocelli slightly longer than distance between ocellus and posterior margin of eye. Length × width of antennomeres ( +holotype +): 1: 0.16 × 0.08; 2: 0.12 × 0.06; 3: 0.13 × 0.05; 4–5: 0.12 × 0.05; 6–8: 0.12 × 0.06; 9: 0.12 × 0.07; 10: 0.11 × 0.07; 11: 0.17 × 0.08. + + +Pronotum about or twice as wide as long, 1.5 times as wide as head; apical margin rounded, slightly protruded anteriad; posterior angles obtuse, with indistinctly emarginated posteriolateral margins; edges of lateral margins of pronotum with irregular, small crenulation; middle portion with wide and moderately deep, transverse, irregular, mediobasal impressions (one +paratype +with additional longitudinal impression, connecting medioapical and mediobasal impressions); surface between punctures in medioapical portion with transverse irregular elevations; lateral portions moderately wide, slightly explanate. + + + +FIGURES 83–86. +Aedeagus of + +Anthobium deplanatum + +(83–84: paratype) and + +A. gaoligongshanense + +(85–86: holotype): 83, 85—parameral view, 84, 86—lateral view. Scale bar: 0.1 mm. + + +Elytra wider than long, more than twice as long as pronotum, distinctly widened posteriad, reaching middle or apical margin of abdominal tergite V, with slightly rounded posterior margins truncated at suture; lateral portions moderately wide, slightly explanate; surface of each elytron with very indistinct four to five longitudinal elevations in middle. + +Male. Protarsomeres 1–4 slightly slightly widened. Apical margins of abdominal tergite VIII slightly and sternite VIII widely emarginated. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 88 +) with wide median lobe, truncated apically; parameres long and narrow, slightly exceeding apex of median lobe, with two apical and two preapical setae; internal sac long and wide, spirally rolled in basal portion. Aedeagus laterally as in +Fig. 89 +. + +Female. Protarsomeres 1–4 moderately narrow. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII somewhat straight. Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII widely rounded. + +Comparative notes. +Based on the coloration, body length, and shape of the forebody, + +A. transversale + + +sp.n. + +is similar to the Himalayan + +A +. +altivagans +( +Cameron, 1941 +) + +, from which it differs by longer antennomeres 5–10, more protruded apical angles of the pronotum, more irregular crenulation of the lateral edges of the pronotum, and different shape and internal structure of the aedeagus. + + + + +Distribution. +The species is known from two locations in Gongga Shan in +Sichuan +, +China +( +Fig. 87 +). + + +Bionomics. +Specimens were collected at elevations from +2900 to 3000 m +a.s.l. The specimens from Gonga Shan range (locality: C53) were taken by sifting various debris, leaf litter and moss accumulated on sandy flats of a creek in the primary + +Abies + +forest with rich undergrowth of rhododendrons. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet is the Latin adjective +transversalis +, - +is +, - +e +(transverse). It refers to the markedly transverse pronotum of the species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB3FFE0FF5B6056FC9FFED2.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB3FFE0FF5B6056FC9FFED2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..90bf9a90e1a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB3FFE0FF5B6056FC9FFED2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + + +Anthobium gaoligongshanense +Shavrin & Smetana + +, +sp.n. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 68 +, +75 +, +85–87 +) + + + + +Type material examined: + +Holotype +♂ +[dissected]: ‘ +CHINA +: +Yunnan + + +[ +CH +07-22], +Nujiang +| +Lisu Aut. Pref. +, Gaoli- gong +Shan +, valley 21 | km +W Gongshan +, + +3320 m + +, +27°47’03’’N +, | +98°27’39’’E +, moss, alder, bamboo, | +Rhodod +[endron], sifted, + +6. +VI + + +.2007, M. Schülke’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘ + +HOLOTYPE +| +Anthobium +| gaoligongshanense + +sp.n. + +| +Shavrin A.V. +& +Smetana +A. 2018’ <red rectangulat label, printed> ( +CSC +) + +. + + + +Paratype +♀ +: same data as the holotype, with additional red rectangular printed label + +‘ + +PARATYPE +| +Anthobium +| gaoligongshanense + +sp.n. + +| +Shavrin A.V. +& +Smetana A. +2018’ ( +CSC +) + +. + + + + +Description +. Measurements (n=2): HW: 0.75–0.79, HL: 0.42–0.45; AL( +holotype +): 1.32; OL: 0.15–0.16; PL: 0.62; PW: 1.25–1.35; ESL: 1.17–1.22; EW: 1.57; AW: 1.38; MTbL( +holotype +): 0.67; MTrL( +holotype +): 0.30 (MTrL 1–4: 0.15; MTrL 5: 0.15); AedL: 0.65; TL: 3.40( +holotype +)–3.54. + + +Body yellow-brown, with somewhat darker apical portion of head and antennomeres 8–11; mouthparts, antennomeres 1–7 and legs yellow. Forebody without meshes between punctures; abdomen with very indistinct isodiametric microsculpture. Head with irregular, fine and deep punctation, slightly denser on infraorbital ridges, with paired impunctated transverse portions between middle impression; neck with moderately large and deep, sparse punctation; pronotum with irregular punctation, finer in middle, larger, markedly sparser and deeper on lateral portions, with moderately wide transverse impunctated area on mediobasal third; scutellum with several fine punctures; punctation of elytra moderately sparse, large and deep, denser and finer on prescutellar area, each elytron forming six vague longitudinal rows of punctures; abdominal tergites with indistinct, dense and fine punctation. Habitus as in +Fig. 75 +. + + +Head 1.7 times as wide as long; middle portion of head slightly elevated, with wide, triangular impression at level of eyes between distinct and moderately deep grooves, reaching posterior margin of eyes; surface between punctures on infraorbital ridges irregularly and slightly elevated; postocular ridge distinct, acute. Distance between ocelli about one anf half times as long as distance between ocellus and posterior margin of eye. Length × width of antennomeres ( +holotype +): 1: 0.20 × 0.08; 2–3: 0.11 × 0.05; 4: 0.10 × 0.06; 5–8: 0.11 × 0.06; 9–10: 0.10 × 0.07; 11: 0.16 × 0.07. + +Pronotum twice as wide as long, 1.6–1.7 times as wide as head, widest about middle, evenly narrowed both postreriad and anteriad; posterior angles obtuse, without posterolateral emargination; edges of lateral margins of pronotum with irregular, small crenulation; middle elevated portion with wide and moderately deep longitudinal impression in apical half and indistinct, semicircular wide impression in mediobasal third; lateral portions very wide and markedly explanate. +Elytra moderately short, markedly wider than long, 1.8–1.9 times as long as pronotum, with straight apical margin, distinctly widened posteriad, reaching middle part of abdominal tergite IV; surface of each elytron with indistinct, five longitudinal elevation between punctures in middle. +Abdomen without visible tomentose wing-folding spots in middle of tergite V. + +Male. Protarsomeres 1–4 slightly widened. Apical margins of abdominal tergite VIII and sternite VIII slightly emarginated.Aedeagus ( +Fig. 85 +) with very wide basal portion, gradually narrowed toward truncated apex of median lobe; parameres rather short and wide, slightly asymmetrical, distinctly exceeding apex of median lobe, with small apical and preapical setae; internal sac very long, wide and spirally rolled in basal portion. Aedeagus laterally as in +Fig. 86 +. + +Female. Protarsomeres 1–4 moderately narrow. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII somewhat straight. Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII rounded. + +Comparative notes. + +Anthobium gaoligongshanense + + +sp.n. + +differs from remaining species of the + +crassum + +-group by the the elytra less than twice as long as pronotum, and by the external and internal structures of the aedeagus. + + + + +Distribution. +The species is known only from the +type +locality in Gaoligong Shan range in +Yunnan +, +China +( +Fig. 86 +). + + +Bionomics. +Specimens were taken by sifting mosses in mixed forest with alder, bamboo and + +Rhododendron + +(locality +CH +07-22: +Fig. 68 +). + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet is the Latinized adjective derived from the name of the Gaoligong Shan and the added suffix – +ense +, denoting the place of the origin. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB9FFE9FF5B60C7FA04FC91.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB9FFE9FF5B60C7FA04FC91.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..907f3c53ba0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB9FFE9FF5B60C7FA04FC91.xml @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + +Key to the species of the + +reflexum + +group + + + + + + + + +1 Lateral edges of pronotum without projections. Body yellow to reddish-brown. Body length: +2.49–3.90 mm +. Aedeagus narrow, with long parameres ( +Fig. 78 +). Habitus as in +Fig. 73 +. Central Asia........................... + +A. reflexum +( +Reitter, 1891 +) + + + + +- Lateral edges of pronotum with indistinct projections. Aedeagus wider, parameres shorter............................ 2 + + + + + +2 Elytra less than twice as long as pronotum. Body yellow-brown. Smaller: +3.40–3.54 mm +. Aedeagus as in +Fig. 85 +; parameres slightly asymmetrical. Habitus as in +Fig. 75 +. +China +: +Yunnan +............................... + +A. gaoligongshanense + + +sp.n. + + + + + +- Elytra markedly more than twice as long as pronotum. Body yellow-brown to reddish-brown, with paler lateral portions of pronotum. Body larger. Aedeagus different; parameres symmetrical ( +Figs. 80 +, +83 +).................................. 3 + + + + + + +3 Body paler, yellow-brown to brown. Body length: +3.70–4.45 mm +. Apical portion of parameres wider; internal sac simple ( +Fig. 80 +). Habitus as in +Fig. 76 +. +India +: Kashmir......................................... + +A.kashmiricum +( +Cameron, 1941 +) + + + + + +- Body darker, reddish-brown. Body length: +3.63–4.50 mm +. Apical portion of parameres narrower; internal sac complicated ( +Fig. 83 +). Habitus as in +Fig. 74 +. +China +: +Sichuan +................................................... + +A. deplanatum + + +sp.n. + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB9FFEDFF5B62EDFCCAF8C0.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB9FFEDFF5B62EDFCCAF8C0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b052d222022 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFB9FFEDFF5B62EDFCCAF8C0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,714 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + + +Anthobium reflexum +( +Reitter, 1891 +) + + + + + +( +Figs. 5, 8, 11, 14 +, +17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 32, 35 +, +38, 41, 44, 47 +, 50, 73, 78–79, 82) + + + + + + +Lathrimaeum reflexum + +Reitter, 1891: 195 + + + + + + + +Lathrimaeum +( +Prionothorax +) +reflexum +: + +Luze 1905: 68 + + +; + +Bernhauer & Schubert 1910: 65 + +; + +Scheerpeltz 1961: 85 + +; + +Coiffait 1970: 144 + +; + +Tichomirova 1973: 27 + +, 139; + +Kastcheev & Ishkov 2001: 101 + + + + + + +Anthobium reflexum +: + +Herman 2001: 237 + + +; + +Hlaváč et al. 2016: 2 + + + + + + +Anthobium +( +Prionothorax +) +reflexum +: + +Smetana 2004: 239 + + +; + +Schülke & Smetana 2015: 307 + + + + + + +Type material examined: +Lectotype +(here designated) of + +Lathrimaeum reflexum +Reitter, 1891 + +♂ +(very small silver round label without data is pinned under the card with the beetle): ‘ +Lathrimaeum reflexum Tashkend. +Typ’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘ +Holotypus +Lathrimaeum reflexum +Reitter’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘ +Lathrimaeum reflexum Rtt. +[handwritten] V.I. Gusarov det. 1996’ <rectagular label, printed> ( +ZIN +). + + +Paralectotypes +: +1 ♂ +: ‘460’ <small rectangular label, printed>, ‘ +Lathrimaeum reflexum +Rtt’ <rectangular label, handwritten>, ‘ +Lathrimaeum reflexum Rtt. +[handwritten] V.I. Gusarov det. 1996’ <rectangular label, printed> ( +ZIN +); +1 spec. +: ‘Ср[едНЯЯ]. АЗиЯ [Middle Asia] | Tashkent [sic]’ <rectangular label, handwritten>, ‘ +Paratypus +[printed] Lathrima | eum reflexum | Reitter [handwritten]’ <red rectangular label> ( +ZIN +). + + + + +Additional material: +KAZAKHSTAN +: + +2 ♂♂ +: ‘ +КаЗах +[ста]-Н; Аксу- | ДЖабаглы | В. КаЩеев [Kazakhstan; Aks-Dzhabagly (=Aksu-Zhabagly Nature Reserve) +V. Kastcheev +] + +17.V.1985 + + +’, ‘ + +Holotypus +Lathrima- | eum (Priono- thorax) | turcestanicum | +Kastcheev’ +( +ZIN +) + +; + +3 ♀♀ +: ‘Аксу-ДЖабаглы, р. ДЖабаглы, 20.5.[19] + +85 В. + +КаЩеев [Aksu- +Dzhabagly +, +Dzhabagly R. +, + +20.05.1985 + +V. +Kastcheev +]’, ‘ + +Lathrimaeum turcestanicum + +Kastcheev’ +( +ZIN +) + +; + +9 ♂♂ +, +6 ♀♀ +: same +Nature Reserve +and river. + +22.06.1985 + +. V. +Kastcheev +( +CS +, +ZIN +) + +; + +2 ♂♂ +: same +Nature Reserve +and river, +Kshi-Kaindy. + +25.04.1979 + +. +V. Kastcheev +( +ZIN +) + +; + +1 ♀ +: same +Nature Reserve +and river, +Ulken-Kaindy. + +15.08.2001 + +. +V. Kastcheev +( +ZIN +) + +; + +3 ♂♂ +, +1 ♀ +: same +Nature Reserve +, +Taldybulak River +. 10- + +20.05.1979 + +. +B. Iskakov +( +ZIN +) + +; + +1 ♂ +, +2 ♀♀ +: +Aksu-Dzhabagly +, kanyon +Aksu R. + +17.05.1988 + +. +V. Kastcheev +( +CS +) + +; + + +UZBEKISTAN +: + +1 ♂ +: right side of +Chatkal River +, +Akbulak River +. + +01.05.1996 + +. K. +Grebennikov +( +CK +) + +; + +1 ♀ +: +Chimgan +[=Chimgon]. +Bottom +of the ravine, stream overgrown with horsetail, in litter. + +07.04.1974 + +. +S.Yu. Gryuntal +( +ZMM +) + +; + + +KYRGYZSTAN +: + +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +: +Sary-Chelek Nature Reserve Sary-Chelek Lake +. + +24.09.1983 + +. +A.B. Ryvkin +(CR) + +; + +1 ♀ +: same +Nature Reserve +and lake. + +2800 m +a.s.l. + + +04.06.1996 + +. A. +Klimenko +( +CS +) + +; + + +TAJIKISTAN +: + +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +: ‘ТадЖикистаН | КоНдара + +9.V.1965 + +| А. Тихомирова | в подстилке [ +Tajikistan +, +Kondara +, + +09.05.1965 + +. A.L. +Tichomirova. +in litter]’ ( +ZMM +; collection of +A.L. Tichomirova +) + +; + +2 ♂♂ +, +3 ♀♀ +: ‘ТадЖикс[каЯ] ССР. Гис- | сарск. хр. КоНдара | в подстилке | 11/5-[19] +65 г +. [А.Л.] Тихомирова [ +Tajik +SSR. +Gissar Mt. +, +Kondara +, in litter, + +11.5.1965 + +. +A.L. Tichomirova +]’ ( +ZMM +; collection of +A.L. Tichomirova +) + +; + +1 ♀ +: +Kandara +, +Kvak Gorge. + +1000 m +a.s.l. + +, near snow field. + +20.05.1985 + +. V.G. +Shilenkov +( +CS +) + +; + +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +: ‘ +Tadzhikistan +| +Dushanbe +| IV’ ( +ZMM +) + +. + + + + +Redescription +. Measurements (n=40): HW: 0.67–0.77, HL: 0.42–0.52; AL (averaged): 1.33; OL: 0.13–0.17; PL: 0.60–0.67; PW: 1.22–1.35; ESL: 1.17–1.47; EW: 1.37–1.60; AW: 1.31–1.42; MTbL (averaged): 0.80, MTrL (averaged): 0.35 (MTrL 1–4: 0.20; MTrL 5: 0.15); AedL: 0.63–0.66; TL: 2.49–3.90 ( +lectotype +: 2.55). + + + +FIGURES 73–77. +Habitus of + +Anthobium + +: 73— + +A. reflexum +(Kazakhstan) + +74— + +A +. +deplanatum + +(holotype), 75— + +A +. +gaoligongshanense + +(holotype), 76— + +A +. +kashmiricum + +, 77— + +A +. +transversale + +(holotype). Scale bar: 1.0 mm. + + + +Forebody flattened, moderately wide. Body yellow to reddish-brown, usually with somewhat darker apical part of head (some specimens with fully brown head), antennomeres 5–11 (or 6–11) and abdomen (sometimes only apical portions of abdominal tergites darker); mouthparts, antennomeres 1–4 (or 1–5) and legs yellow. Body shiny; head with distinct, transverse microsculpture between punctures, denser in middle portion between eyes and even more on infraorbital ridges; neck with dense isodiametric meshes; middle portion of pronotum with moderately dense transverse meshes, sometimes indistinct or lacking in mediobasal third; middle portion of scutellum with distinct isodiametric or transverse meshes, or without them; abdomen with distinct transverse microsculpture. Head with very dense, fine, coriaceous punctures, sometimes merging in middle portion between eyes, denser, larger and deeper on infraorbital ridges; apical margin of neck with very dense fine punctation; pronotum with dense, irregular punctation, finer and denser in middle and sparser, larger and deeper on lateral portions, sometimes with narrow, transverse impunctated area on mediobasal third; scutellum with moderately dense punctation, as that in middle portion of pronotum; punctation of elytra very dense, large and deep, somewhat sparser and finer in basal portion and along suture, with interspaces between punctures in middle as long as diameter of two-three nearest punctures, each elytron bearing five to six very vague and tangled longitudinal rows of punctures, replaced by confluent punctures in some specimens; abdominal tergites with dense, regular, fine and moderately deep punctation. Body glabrous; clypeus with several semierect moderately long tactile setae; abdominal tergites with regular, dense, very short setation. Habitus as in +Fig. 73 +and +Figs. 2 +(1a, 1b) in +Tichomirova (1973) +. + + +Head moderately large ( +Fig. 17 +), 1.4–1.5 times as wide as long; middle portion slightly elevated, sometimes with transverse paired impressions about at level of midlength of eyes, with wide longitudinal impressions between middle elevated portion and eyes; infraorbital ridges narrowly elevated along dorsal margin of eyes; grooves in front of ocelli indistinct and short; some specimens with semicircular impression in mediobasal portion between ocelli; surface between punctures in middle portion between eyes and on infraorbital ridges irregularly elevated; postocular ridge distinct, obtuse; surface between postocular ridge and posterior margin of eye as long as two-three nearest combined ommatidia; anterior portion between antennal insertion and anterior margin of eye with indistinct to distinct, wide, semicircular notch. Eyes moderately small, convex. Ocelli large, situated about at level of postocular ridges; distance between ocelli about twice as long as distance between ocellus and posterior margin of eye. Labrum wide, transverse, with rounded membranous latero-apical portions, moderately deep apical emargination and short basolateral projections ( +Fig. 5 +). Mandibles short and moderately narrow, with somewhat obtuse apices, with distinct small, subtriangular tooth in about middle of right mandible ( +Fig. 8 +). Submentum and labium narrow, with very short, transverse preapical labial palpomere ( +Fig. 14 +). Apical segment of maxillary palp about twice as long as preceding segment; galea slightly swollen apically; lacinia moderately wide ( +Fig. 11 +). Gular sutures with shortest distance between posterior margins of eyes ( +Fig. 17 +). Antenna moderately short, slightly exceeding shoulders of elytra when reclined, with antennomeres progressively widened apicad from middle; length × width of antennomeres (averaged): 1: 0.18 × 0.07; 2–3: 0.13 × 0.06; 4: 0.11 × 0.06; 5: 0.12 × 0.06; 6–8: 0.10 × 0.07; 9–10: 0.10 × 0.08; 11: 0.16 × 0.08. + + +Pronotum large and transverse, about twice as wide as long, 1.7–1.8 times as wide as head, widest in middle, slightly more narrowed posteriad than anteriad; apical margin slightly rounded, markedly narrower than posterior margin; anterior angles rounded, very strongly protruded anteriad; posterior angles acute, with slightly emarginated posterolateral margins; edges of lateral margins with small irregular crenulation, somewhat flattened laterobasally; middle portion wide, slightly elevated, sometimes with moderately wide longitudinal impression in middle, usually with very wide, transverse impression in mediobasal third (longitudinal impression of some specimens reaching mediobasal impression, some specimens without distinct impressions); lateral portions wide, markedly reflexed, each with very deep oval pit in middle, sometimes middle elevation with additional very deep, transverse impression connecting with medio-lateral pits. Prothorax ( +Fig. 20 +) with short acute intercoxal process, and moderately short protruded mesosternal processes, rounded apically. Mesothorax ( +Fig. 29 +) with somewhat acute intercoxal process, almost reaching posterior margin of mesocoxae. Scutellum as in +Fig. 23 +. Metathorax as in +Fig. 32 +. Metendosternite as in +Fig. 35 +. + + +Elytra flattened, distinctly wider than long, twice as long as pronotum, slightly or distinctly widened posteriad from middle, reaching apical margin of abdominal tergite IV or V, with widely rounded apical angles and somewhat straight or slightly rounded apical margin truncated at suture; shoulders of elytra widely rounded, not protruded anteriad ( +Fig. 26 +); lateral portions of elytra wide, markedly explanate, latero-apical margins with small, acute crenulation; sometimes surface of each elytron with very indistinct one to three longitudinal elevation in middle. Wings fully developed. + +Legs moderately long and slender, tibiae covered by sparse elongate setae, with a few strong setae on apical margin near apex; metatarsus less than twice as long as metatibia. + + +FIGURES 78–81. +Aedeagus of + +Anthobium reflexum + +(78–79: Kazakhstan) and + +A. kashmiricum + +(80–81: India, Kashmir): 78, 80—parameral view, 79, 81—lateral view. Scale bar: 0.1 mm. + + + + +FIGURE 82. +Distribution of + +Anthobium reflexum + +(black circles) and + +A. kashmiricum + +(black squares) in Central Asia. + + +Abdomen distinctly narrower than elytra, with a pair of small rounded tomentose wing-folding spots in middle of tergite V (some specimens without visible spots); apical margin of abdominal tegite VII with very fine palisade fringe. + +Male. Protarsomeres 1–4 slightly widened. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII straight ( +Fig. 38 +). Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII emarginated ( +Fig. 41 +). Aedeagus ( +Fig. 78 +) narrow, long, with truncated apex of median lobe; parameres long and wide, slightly exceeding apex of median lobe, with two apical and two preapical setae; internal sac narrow and long. Aedeagus laterally as in +Fig. 79 +. + + +Female. Protarsomeres 1–4 narrow. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII emarginated ( +Fig. 44 +). Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII widely rounded ( +Fig. 47 +). Genital segment as in +Fig. 50 +. + + +Comparative notes. + +Anthobium reflexum + +differs from the remaining species of the + +reflexum + +-group by the lateral edges of the pronotum without projections, and by the shape of the aedeagus and its interal structure. + + + + +Distribution. + +Anthobium reflexum + +is distributed in mountains of the central Asia in southern +Kazakhstan +, eastern +Uzbekistan +, western +Kyrgyzstan +and western +Tajikistan +( +Fig. 82 +). + + +Bionomics. +The species is known mainly from high elevations and inhabits riparian, forest and swampy ( +Reitter 1891 +) habitats, where it can be found in mosses ( +Coiffait 1970 +), near streams, in litter and occasionally near snow fields. + + + + +Remarks. + +Lathrimaeum reflexum + +was originally described from unspecified number of specimens from “Taschkent” (see above), Turkestan (now +Uzbekistan +). +Luze (1905) +placed this species to the subgenus + +Prionothorax +Luze, 1905 + +and redescribed it. +Coiffait (1970) +recorded the species from “Monts Tschingan” ( +Uzbekistan +). Kastcheev & Iskov (2001) recorded it from Aksu-Dzhabagly Natural Reserve, +Kazakhstan +(see revised specimens in the material section above). +Tichomirova (1973) +and Smetana & +Schülke (2015) +noted distribution of the species for Middle Asia (“Ср[едНЯЯ]. АЗ[иЯ]”) and +Tajikistan +, +Uzbekistan +(“TD TD [sic] UZ”) respectively. + + +The species is reported from +Kyrgyzstan +for the first time. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFBAFFE8FF5B6653FD9DFA0E.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFBAFFE8FF5B6653FD9DFA0E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..33fb4809f6d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFBAFFE8FF5B6653FD9DFA0E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + + +Anthobium farkaci +Shavrin & Smetana + +, +sp.n. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 59 +, +64 +, +71–72 +) + + + + +Type material examined: + +Holotype +♂ +[dissected]: ‘ +CHINA +: W +Sichuan +| +20 km +N +Sabdê +, + +3200 m + +| +29°35N +102°23 E +, + +15.VII. + +| 1998, +A. Smetana +[C83]’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘1998 +China Expedition +| +J. Farkač +, +D. Král +, | +J. Schneider +| & +A. Smetana’ +<rectangular label, printed + +>, ‘ + +HOLOTYPE +| +Anthobium +| farkaci + +sp.n. + +| +Shavrin A.V. +& +Smetana A. +2018’ <red rectangular label, printed> ( +NSMT +) + +. + + + + +FIGURES 69–72. +Aedeagus of + +Anthobium explanatum + +(69–70: paratype) and + +A. farkaci + +(71–72: holotype): 69, 71—parameral view, 70, 72—lateral view. Scale bar: 0.1 mm. + + + + +Description +. Measurements of the +holotype +: HW: 0.85; HL: 0.45; AL: 1.40; OL: 0.18; PL: 0.65; PW: 1.33; ESL: 1.65; EW: 1.72; AW: 1.70; MTbL: 0.80; MTrL: 0.38 (MTrL 1–4: 0.23; MTrL 5: 0.15); AedL: 0.90; TL: 3.87. + + +Head and antennomeres 8–11 brown; pronotum, elytra and abdomen reddish-brown; mouthparts, antennomeres 1–7, lateral portions of pronotum, legs and apical tergites of abdomen yellow-brown. Lateral portions of head with distinct diagonal meshes between punctures; abdomen with small isodiametric microsculpture. Head with very irregular fine punctation, markedly denser on infraorbital ridges, only with several fine punctures between grooves in front of ocelli, with wide transverse and diagonal impunctated portions in middle of head; neck with dense, fine and deep punctation; pronotum with very sparse fine punctation, finer and sparser in middle and sparser on lateral portions; scutellum without visible punctures; punctation of elytra moderately sparse and fine, markedly larger than that on pronotum, denser and finer on parascutellar portion and along suture, punctures on each elytron tangled, forming very indistinct three to four longitudinal rows in middle. Habitus as in +Fig. 59 +. + +Head 1.8 times as wide as long; middle portion and infraorbital ridges slightly elevated, with moderately wide impression between elongate and deep grooves in front of ocelli, reaching middle level of eye; postocular ridge smooth. Ocelli situated at level slightly behind of postocular ridges. Length × width of antennomeres: 1: 0.18 × 0.10; 2: 0.15 × 0.06; 3: 0.12 × 0.05; 4–0.10 × 0.06; 5–6: 0.11 × 0.06; 7: 0.11 × 0.07; 8–9: 0.10 × 0.07; 10: 0.10 × 0.08; 11: 0.22 × 0.08. +Pronotum about twice as wide as long, 1.5 times as wide as head; posterior angles moderately obtuse; lateral margins with irregular and very indistinct projections, with additional small crenulation on edges; distinctly elevated middle portion without longitudinal impression, with indistinct, wide, paired impressions on mediobasal third. + +Elytra as that in + +A. crassum + + +sp.n. + +, but slightly less convex, reaching basal margin of abdominal tergite V; lateral portions moderately wide, slightly explanate; surface of each elytron with indistinct longitudinal elevation between punctures, stretching from shoulders diagonally to apical third. + + +Male. Apical margins of abdominal tergite VIII slightly and sternite VIII deeply emarginated. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 71 +) large, with very wide basal portion, gradually narrowed toward narrow, subtruncate apex; parameres short, wide, moderately exceeding apex of median lobe, with seven short apical, and one preapical setae; internal sac moderately wide, very long, spirally rolled in basal portion. Aedeagus laterally as in +Fig. 72 +. + +Female unknown. + +Comparative notes. + +Anthobium farkaci + + +sp.n. + +differs from the remaining species of the + +crassum + +-group by the smaller and sparser punctation of pronotum and elytra, narrower pronotum, and by details of external and internal characters of the aedeagus. + + + + +Distribution. +The species is known only from the +type +locality near Sabdê, +Sichuan +, +China +( +Fig. 64 +). + + +Bionomics. +The +holotype +was collected at elevation +3200 m +a.s.l. in soaking wet moss in forest seepage in an old mixed forest ( + +Abies + +, + +Pinus + +, + +Betula + +, + +Populus + +). + + + + +Etymology. +Eponymic, the species is named to honor our colleague Jan Farkač ( +Prague +, +Czech Republic +), one of the collectors of the +holotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFBDFFE3FF5B6645FD95FF37.xml b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFBDFFE3FF5B6645FD95FF37.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..80939e8f98d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C7/3706C715FFBDFFE3FF5B6645FD95FF37.xml @@ -0,0 +1,315 @@ + + + +A revision of Eastern Palaearctic Anthobium Leach, 1819 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Anthophagini). III. Consanguineum, crassum and reflexum groups, and an additional species of the fusculum group + + + +Author + +Shavrin, Alexey V. + + + +Author + +Smetana, Aleš + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-10-24 + + +4688 + + +4 + + +451 +482 + + + +journal article +25154 +10.11646/zootaxa.4688.4.1 +c4072224-34c3-4b12-9415-a59d7c9484b6 +1175-5326 +3517608 +BABABF8C-30B3-45D0-89B5-6F4DC1B19B70 + + + + + + + +Anthobium deplanatum +Shavrin & Smetana + +, +sp.n. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 74 +, +83–84 +, +87 +) + + + + +Type material examined: + +Holotype +♂ +: ‘ +CHINA +: W-Sichuan | Ya`an Prefecture, Tianquan | co., +E Erlang Shan + + + + +Pass’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘ + +2900m + +, + +20.VI.1999 + +| 29.52.36N, 102.17.82E | leg. +A. Pütz’ +<rectangular label, printed>, ‘ +Sammlung +| +Andreas Pütz +| +Eisenhüttenstadt’ +<yellow rectangular label, printed>, ‘ +HOLOTYPE +| +Anthobium +| deplanatum + +sp.n. + +| +Shavrin A. +& +Smetana A. +2019’ <red rectangular label, printed> (temporarily in +CAP +, to be eventually deposited in +SNSD +). + + + +Paratypes +( +2 specimens +): +1 ♂ +[dissected], + +1 ♀ +: ‘ +CHINA +: W-Sichuan + +20. VI. 1999 + +| Ya`an +Prefecture +, +Tianqan Co. +| +E Erlang Shan Pass +, + +2900 m + +| + +9 km +SE Luding + +, +29°52N +, | +102°18E +, +Bachufer +, +Moos ++ | +Schotter +, leg. +M. Schülke’ +<rectangular label, printed>, ‘ +Sammlung +| +M. Schülke +| +Berlin’ +<green rectangular label, printed> ( +1 ♂ +: +CS +; +1 ♀ +: +CSC +) + +; + +1 ♀ +[Specimen without right elytron and right hind tarsus]: ‘ +CHINA +: W-Sichuan | Ya`an +Prefecture +, +Tianquan +| +Co., E Erlang Shan Pass’ +<rectangular label, printed>, ‘ + +2900m + +, + +20.VI.1999 + +| 29.52.36N, 102.17.82E | leg. +A.Pütz’ +<rectangular label, printed>, ‘ +Sammlung +| +Andreas Pütz +| +Eisenhüttenstadt’ +<yellow rectangular label, printed> ( +CAP +). All +paratypes +with additional red rectangular printed label + +: ‘ +PARATYPE +| +Anthobium +| deplanatum + +sp.n. + +| Shavrin A.V. & Smetana A. 2019’. + + + + +Description +. Measurements (n=4): HW: 0.80–0.82; HL: 0.52–0.55; AL ( +holotype +): 1.86; OL: 0.20–0.22; PL: 0.62–0.66;PW:1.35–1.40; ESL:1.52–1.74; EW:1.80–2.27;AW:1.45–1.65; MTbL( +holotype +):0.85,MTrL( +holotype +): 0.35 (MTrL 1–4: 0.18; MTrL 5: 0.17); AedL( +paratype +): 0.82; TL: 3.63–4.50( +holotype +). + + +Body and antennomeres 4–11 reddish-brown; mouthparts, antennomeres 1–3, lateral portions of pronotum and elytra yellow to yellow-brown. Middle portion of head with indistinct, irregular, transverse meshes between punctures, and dense, transverse microsculpture on posterior portion of infraorbital ridges; neck with isodiametric microsculpture; pronotum and scutellum without meshes. Head with fine, moderately deep punctation, irregular and sparser in middle portion between eyes, markedly coarser and denser on infraorbital ridges, with small paired impunctated portions in middle at level of posterior third of eyes; neck with irregular, fine and deep punctures; pronotum with dense, irregular punctation, finer and denser on medioapical and mediobasal portions, sparser in middle ( +holotype +with impunctated area in mediobasal third), markedly denser, larger and deeper in lateral portions; scutellum with several fine punctures; punctation of elytra denser and finer on prescutellar area, each elytron forming six to seven very vague and tangled longitudinal rows of punctures; abdominal tergites with indistinct fine punctation. Habitus as in +Fig. 74 +. + + +Head 1.4–1.5 times as wide as long; middle portion distinctly elevated, with moderately deep semicircular impression in middle; grooves in front of ocelli deep and short, reaching posterior third of eyes; surface between punctures on infraorbital ridges irregularly elevated. Eyes moderately large. Distance between ocelli about one and half times as long as distance between ocellus and posterior margin of eye. Antenna long, reaching one fourth length of elytra when reclined; antennomeres 3–10 elongate; length × width of antennomeres ( +holotype +): 1: 0.20 × 0.09; 2: 0.12 × 0.06; 3: 0.16 × 0.05; 4: 0.16 × 0.06; 5–7: 0.17 × 0.06; 8–9: 0.16 × 0.07; 10: 0.16 × 0.08; 11: 0.23 × 0.09. + + +Pronotum distinctly more than twice as long as wide, 1.6–1.7 times as wide as head; lateral sides gradually narrowed anteriad, with moderately narrowly protruded anterior angles; posteriolateral margins of pronotum distinctly emarginated in front of acute posterior angles; lateral edges of pronotum with irregular, small, rounded crenulation (mediolateral margin of pronotum of one +paratype +with two small indistinct protrusions); middle elevated portion with two irregular, wide and moderately deep, transverse impressions in medioapical and mediobasal portions, +holotype +and one +paratype +with additional moderately wide and deep longitudinal impression between transverse impressions; middle elevation with moderately deep, transverse impression connecting with mediolateral pits. + +Elytra markedly wider than long, distinctly more than twice as long as pronotum, distinctly widened apicad from middle; surface of each elytron with indistinct three to four longitudinal elevation between punctures in middle. + +Male. Protarsomeres 1–4 slightly widened. Apical margins of abdominal tergite VIII and sternite VIII emarginated. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 83 +) semioval, with widely rounded apex of median lobe; parameres moderately narrow, slightly exceeding apex of median lobe, with two apical and two preapical setae; internal sac very long and complicated, with several fields of long sclerotized thorns in middle portion. Aedeagus laterally as in +Fig. 84 +. + +Female. Protarsomeres 1–4 moderately narrow. Apical margins of abdominal tergite VIII and sternite VIII rounded. + +Comparative notes. +Regarding the body size and the length of the elytra, + +A. deplanatum + + +sp.n. + +is similar to + +A. kashmiricum + +, from which it can be distinguished by the darker coloration, shapes of the anterior angles of the pronotum, and by the external and internal structures of the aedeagus. + + + + +Distribution. +The species is known only from the +type +locality in Erlang Shan range in +Sichuan +, +China +( +Fig. 87 +). + + +Bionomics. +The specimens were collected at elevation +2900 m +a.s.l. by sifting of mosses and gravel. +Etymology. +The specific epithet is the Latin adjective +deplanatus +, - +a +, - +um +(flattened). It refers to the markedly flattened forebody of the species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C9/3706C9276D04FFA5FFD4F983FF58F97B.xml b/data/37/06/C9/3706C9276D04FFA5FFD4F983FF58F97B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f7900cfb3fa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C9/3706C9276D04FFA5FFD4F983FF58F97B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,512 @@ + + + +Four new species of Pleroma (Melastomataceae) from campos rupestres and vegetation on granitic inselbergs in Eastern Minas Gerais, Brazil + + + +Author + +Goldenberg, R. +Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19031, 81531 - 970 Curitiba - PR, Brazil. E-mail: renato. goldenberg @ gmail. com. +renato.goldenberg@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Gonella, P. M. +Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Campus Sete Lagoas, 35701 - 970 Sete Lagoas - MG, Brazil. + + + +Author + +Meyer, F. S. +Herbarium UPCB and Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19031, 81531 - 970 - Curitiba, PR, Brazil. + +text + + +Edinburgh Journal of Botany + + +2022 + +2022-05-03 + + +79 + + +624 + + +1 +30 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.24823/ejb.2022.624 + +journal article +285461 +10.24823/EJB.2022.624 +861bd545-1470-46fa-9c50-4471dd689459 +1747-0036 +10523466 + + + + + +4. + +Pleroma petrophylax +F.S.Mey. & R.Goldenb. + +, + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + +Pleroma petrophylax + +differs from + +P. caetanoi +F.S.Mey. & R.Goldenb. + +by its leaves with longer petioles, +6.8–12.6 mm +long (versus petioles +1.2–3.6 mm +long in + +P. caetanoi + +), and blade with branched trichomes on the adaxial surface (versus blade with unbranched trichomes on the adaxial surface). + + + + + +– Type: +Brazil +, +Minas Gerais +, +Conselheiro Pena +, +afloramento quartZítico próximo a Vista Alegre +(distrito +de Alvarenga +), +19°23′42.30′′S +, +41°33′26.7′′W +, + +980 m + +, + +1 ii 2021 + +, + +P.M. Gonella +, +D.P. Cordeiro +, +G.A. da Silva +& +P.R. Bartholomay + +2083 ( +holotype +UPCB, + + +isotype +MBML +). + +Figures 9 +, +10 + + +. + + + + +Erect shrubs +1.2–1.5 m +tall, with sympodial growth, moderately branched. +Younger branches +quadrangular, angulose, moderately to densely setulose, trichomes +0.3–1.6 mm +long, unbranched or branched, exclusively eglandular or both glandular and eglandular, curved, the base slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked; +older branches +quadrangular, angulose, with indument similar to younger branches but deciduous, and basally decorticant; +nodes +slender. +Leaves +opposite; chartaceous, with distinct petioles, +6.8–12.6 mm +long; +blades +3.8–6.3 × +2.6–3.8 cm +, chartaceous, discolorous, ovate, lacking domatia on the abaxial surface, base cordate, apex acute, margins crenulate, 7 acrodromous nerves, the marginals tenuous, adaxial surface flat, dark green in dry specimens and fresh material, moderately to densely scabrous, trichomes +1–3 mm +long, branched, eglandular, curved, the base strongly broadened, not immersed, not forked, abaxial surface flat, light brown in dry specimens and in fresh material, moderately setose on the primary and secondary veins, trichomes +1–2.5 mm +long, unbranched or branched, eglandular, curved, the base slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked, densely pilose or densely setulose on the surface, tertiary and quaternary veins, trichomes +0.7–3 mm +long, unbranched or branched, eglandular, curved, the base slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked. +Thyrsoids +5–10 × +5–9 cm +, terminal, c.55–120 flowers, axis quadrangular, sparsely to moderately setulose or hirsute, trichomes +0.4–2.2 mm +long, unbranched or branched, eglandular or eglandular and glandular mixed, curved to erect, the base linear to slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked, purple to reddish; +bracts +late deciduous, leafy, with conspicuous petioles, +4.9–6.8 mm +long, blade 27.5–32.3 × +17.1–23.8 mm +, ovate, indumentum the same as on the leaves; +bracteoles +early deciduous, 3.7–5 × +1.7–3.1 mm +, ovate, apex acute, not covering the apex of the flower bud, margins entire, ciliate, adaxial surface glabrous, abaxial surface sparsely to moderately setose or setulose, with the indument uniformly arranged along the entire abaxial surface, trichomes +0.2–1.2 mm +long, unbranched, both eglandular and glandular, curved, the base linear or slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked. +Flowers +5-merous, pedicels +1.5–2.7 mm +long; +hypanthium +3.7–4.9 × +2.2–3.7 mm +, obovate, not costate, moderately setose, trichomes +0.5–2.2 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular or both eglandular and glandular, curved, the base linear to slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked; +sepals +late deciduous, 2–2.5 × +1.6–2.3 mm +, triangular, margins ciliate, apex acute, adaxial surface glabrous, abaxial surface with the same trichomes as the hypanthium, but restricted to its central portion; +petals +purple with a white base (during anthesis) or purple with a red base (in senescent flowers), 18.2–26.1 × +16.8–21.8 mm +, obovate, apex obtuse or truncate, ciliate; +stamens +10, strongly dimorphic, antesepalous with the filaments white (during anthesis) to reddish (in senescent flowers), +5.1–5.7 mm +long, sparsely setulose on the basal two-thirds, trichomes +0.1–0.3 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, curved to erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, pedoconnective purple, +0.7–1.1 mm +prolonged below the thecae, moderately to densely setulose, trichomes +0.1–0.3 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, ventral appendages bilobed, apex obtuse, c. +0.1 mm +long, glabrous or moderately setulose, trichomes c. +0.1 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, thecae 5.1–6.2 × +0.4–0.5 mm +, falcate, purple, antepetalous with the filaments white (during anthesis) or rosy to reddish + + + +Figure 9. + +Pleroma petrophylax +F.S.Mey. & R.Goldenb. + +, +sp. nov. +A, Branch with inflorescence; B, surface of a young branch; C, leaf (adaxial surface); D, leaf (abaxial surface); E, detail of the leaf indument (adaxial surface); F, detail of the leaf indumentum (abaxial surface); G, bracteole (abaxial surface); H, flower without petals; I, detail of the indument on the hypanthium (abaxial surface); J, antesepalous stamen; K, detail of the setulose filament shown in J; L, detail of the connective and appendages covered with glandular trichomes shown in J; M, antepetalous stamen; N, detail of the setulose filament shown in M; O, detail of the glabrous connective and appendages shown in M; P, ovary and style detached from the hypanthium; Q, immature capsule. All from the holotype, +Gonella +et al. 2083 (UPCB). Photographs: F. S. Meyer. + + + + +Figure 10. + +Pleroma petrophylax + +in the field. A, Plant growing on campos rupestres; B, branch with inflorescence; C, flower; D, detail of the stamens and style. Photographs: P. M. Gonella. + + + +(in senescent flowers), +3.7–4.5 mm +long, sparsely to moderately setulose on the basal two-thirds, trichomes +0.1–0.3 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, curved to erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, pedoconnective white, +0.5–0.8 mm +prolonged below the thecae, glabrous, ventral appendages bilobed, apex obtuse, c. +0.2 mm +long, glabrous, thecae 3.9–4.7 × +0.7–0.9 mm +, falcate, white; +ovary +3.4–4.5 × +2.4–3.2 mm +, 5-locular, apex densely sericeous, trichomes +0.2–1 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, appressed, the base linear, not immersed, not forked; +style +white (during anthesis) or purple (in senescent flowers), +5.6–6.3 mm +long, apex curved, moderately pilose to setulose on the basal two-thirds, trichomes +0.2–0.4 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, curved, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, stigma truncate. +Capsular fruits +8–8.5 × +5.3–6.4 mm +, sepals late deciduous, epicarp undivided when mature, costate. + + + + +Distribution and habitat +. + +Pleroma petrophylax + +was collected on both the quartzitic campos rupestres of the João Pinto Formation and on a granitic inselberg (see + +Figure 3 + +). The species was recorded at a small fragment of quartzitic outcrop south of the Serra do Padre Ângelo, near the district of Vista Alegre (municipality of Alvarenga) and at the Environmental Protection Area Pedra do Paredão, a granitic massif in the municipality of Santa Rita do Itueto. At both sites, the populations were very small: only five individuals were observed in the first site, and around 20 at the latter. The species is rupicolous, growing on small pockets of soil over exposed rock at elevations between 705 and + +980 m +. + +It is syntopic with + +Pleroma caetanoi + +and + +P. heteromallum +D.Don + +at the campo rupestre site, and with + +Merianthera verrucosa +R.Goldenb., Fraga & A.P.Fontana + +at the inselberg site. + + + + +Phenology +. Collected with flowers and fruits in February and May. + + + + +Proposed IUCN conservation category +. Critically Endangered: CR B2ab(iii). + +Pleroma petrophylax + +has an AOO of +8 km +2 +, a severely fragmented distribution, and small subpopulations, and is under the same threats listed above for + +P. brevicomosum + +and + +P. caetanoi + +. Although the species was recorded at the Environmental Protection Area at Santa Rita do Itueto (category V of +Dudley, 2008 +), the area where it was found hosted invasive grasses and is close to areas grazed by cattle. The species is, therefore, assessed as Critically Endangered, based on IUCN criteria ( +IUCN, 2012 +). + + + + +Etymology +. The specific epithet derives from the Greek +pétra +for ‘rock’, and +phylax +, +phylakos +for ‘guardian’, ‘protector’. It refers to the singular habitat of this new species, the rocky outcrops of the Atlantic Rain Forest, where it remained even after the intense destruction of the vegetation at this biodiversity hotspot. + + + + +Additional specimen examined +. + +BRAZIL +. + +Minas Gerais + +: +Santa Rita de Itueto +, +A +. +P +. +A +. +Municipal Pedra do Paredão +, +Pedra de Santa Rita +, início da trilha para o topo da pedra, +19°22′35.9′′S +, +41°22′51.5′′W +, + +705 m + +, + +6 v 2021 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 2681 ( +MBML +, +UPCB +) + +. + + + + + +Pleroma petrophylax + +is morphologically related to the species classically assigned to + +Tibouchina +sect. +Pleroma +(D.Don) Cogn. + +( +sensu +Cogniaux, 1885 +, +1891 +), especially to the group of species with the antesepalous stamens with appendages and pedoconnectives covered with glandular trichomes [the + +P. heteromallum +(D.Don) D.Don + +complex; see + +Meyer +et al. +, 2016 + +, +2018 +]. Within this group, + +Pleroma petrophylax + +is closer to the species with branches lacking wings, and also with leaves sessile or with short petioles, with a cordate base, the hypanthium covered with glandular trichomes, and the style pilose on its lower portion. Because of the scabrose adaxial surface of the leaves, the costate fruits, and the distribution in the same campos rupestres along the lower Rio Doce, we believe that the closest morphological relative of + +Pleroma petrophylax + +must be + +P. caetanoi + +. Both species are erect shrubs with ovate leaves, thyrsoid inflorescences with the axis covered with glandular and eglandular trichomes, ovate bracteoles, petals purple with a white base, and stamens with setulose filaments. + +Pleroma petrophylax + +differs from + +P. caetanoi + +by the characters described in the diagnosis, and also by its moderately setose hypanthium (versus moderately to densely sericeous in + +P. caetanoi + +). + + + +Pleroma petrophylax + +also resembles + +P. decemcostatum + +by its ovate leaves, thyrsoid inflorescences, ovate bracteoles, petals purple with a white base, stamens with setulose filaments, the antesepalous with pedoconnectives and appendages covered with glandular trichomes, pilose style, and costate fruits. + +Pleroma petrophylax + +differs from + +P. decemcostatum + +by its leaves scabrous on the abaxial surface (versus sericeous in + +P. decemcostatum + +), with branched trichomes (versus unbranched trichomes). + + + + + +Pleroma petrophylax + +is also related to + +P. costatocalyx + +by its ovate leaves, thyrsoid inflorescences, ovate bracteoles, petals purple with a white base, stamens with setulose filaments, the antesepalous with pedoconnectives and appendages covered with glandular trichomes, pilose style, and costate fruits. + +Pleroma petrophylax + +differs from + +P. costatocalyx + +by its leaves scabrous on the abaxial surface (versus sericeous in + +P. costatocalyx + +), with branched trichomes, not forked at the base (versus unbranched trichomes, several-forked at the base). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C9/3706C9276D14FFBAFFD4FE45FD93FEB7.xml b/data/37/06/C9/3706C9276D14FFBAFFD4FE45FD93FEB7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..25f09d592ad --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C9/3706C9276D14FFBAFFD4FE45FD93FEB7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,678 @@ + + + +Four new species of Pleroma (Melastomataceae) from campos rupestres and vegetation on granitic inselbergs in Eastern Minas Gerais, Brazil + + + +Author + +Goldenberg, R. +Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19031, 81531 - 970 Curitiba - PR, Brazil. E-mail: renato. goldenberg @ gmail. com. +renato.goldenberg@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Gonella, P. M. +Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Campus Sete Lagoas, 35701 - 970 Sete Lagoas - MG, Brazil. + + + +Author + +Meyer, F. S. +Herbarium UPCB and Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19031, 81531 - 970 - Curitiba, PR, Brazil. + +text + + +Edinburgh Journal of Botany + + +2022 + +2022-05-03 + + +79 + + +624 + + +1 +30 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.24823/ejb.2022.624 + +journal article +285461 +10.24823/EJB.2022.624 +861bd545-1470-46fa-9c50-4471dd689459 +1747-0036 +10523466 + + + + + +1. + +Pleroma brevicomosum +F.S.Mey. & R.Goldenb. + +, + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +differs from + +P. divaricatum +(Cogn.) P.J.F.Guim. & Michelang. + +by its ovate leaves (versus oblong-lanceolate in + +P. divaricatum + +), these being chartaceous (versus membranaceous) and strigose on the adaxial surface (versus sericeous); slightly dimorphic stamens (versus pronouncedly dimorphic); elongate style, +13.3–14.1 mm +long (versus short, c. +3 mm +long); and ecostate capsules (versus costate). + + + + + +– Type: +Brazil +, +Minas Gerais +, +Conselheiro Pena +, +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Pico do Padre Ângelo +, +Platô do topo do pico +, +19°19′5.04′′S +, +41°34′42.26′′W +, + +1480 m + +, + +11 vii 2020 + +, + +P.M. Gonella +, +R.S. Ribeiro +, +G.A. da Silva +, +A.P. Araújo +& +J.C. Ribeiro + +1425 ( +holotype +UPCB +, + + +isotype +MBML +). + +Figures 1 +, +2 + + +. + + + + +Erect to decumbent shrubs +0.4–0.7 m +tall, with sympodial growth, poorly branched. +Younger branches +terete, not winged, moderately strigose, trichomes +0.5–1.5 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, appressed, the base linear, not immersed, not forked; +older branches +terete, not winged, with indument similar to younger branches, but deciduous, and basally decorticating; +nodes +slender. +Leaves +opposite; chartaceous, with petioles very short, +0.9–2 mm +long; +blades +2.2–4.3 × +1.9–2.9 cm +, chartaceous, slightly discolorous, ovate, lacking domatia on the abaxial surface, base cordate, apex acute, margins crenulate, 5 acrodromous nerves, the marginals tenuous, adaxial surface flat, brown in dry specimens, bright green in fresh material, moderately strigose, trichomes +0.5–1.5 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, appressed, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, abaxial surface flat, light brown or pale green in dry specimens, pale green in fresh material, moderately strigose to setulose on the primary and secondary veins, trichomes +0.8–1.8 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, appressed or curved, the base slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked, but moderately strigose to setulose on the surface, tertiary and quaternary veins, trichomes +0.1–0.6 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, appressed, the base linear, not immersed, not forked. +Thyrsoids +9–26.5 × +5–10 cm +, terminal, c.15–25 flowers, axis terete, with the same indumentum as the younger branches, reddish; +bracts +late deciduous, leafy, petioles short, +0.6–1.1 mm +long, blade 21.4–24.9 × +17.2–21.9 mm +, ovate, indumentum the same as on the leaves; +bracteoles +early deciduous, 5.5–6 × +3.3–3.7 mm +, elliptic or ovate, apex rounded, not covering the apex of the flower bud, margins entire, ciliate, adaxial surface glabrous, abaxial surface moderately strigose or moderately setulose, with indument uniformly arranged along the entire abaxial surface, trichomes +0.3–0.9 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, appressed or curved, the base linear or slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked. +Flowers +5-merous, pedicels +0.7–1 mm +long; +hypanthium +5.4–5.8 × +5–5.3 mm +, obovate, not costate, moderately setulose, trichomes +0.4–1.3 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, curved, the base broadened, not immersed, not forked; +sepals +early deciduous, 4–4.3 × +2–2.3 mm +, triangular, margins ciliate, apex acute, adaxial surface glabrous, abaxial surface with the same trichomes as the hypanthium, but restricted to its central portion; +petals +purple with a white base (during anthesis) or purple with a red base (in senescent flowers), 22.7–25.8 × +19–21.2 mm +, obovate, apex cuspidate or mucronate, ciliate; +stamens +10, slightly dimorphic, antesepalous with the filaments white (during anthesis) or purple to reddish (in senescent flowers), +7.3–8.3 mm +long, glabrous or sparsely setulose on its central portion, trichomes +0.6–0.8 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, curved to erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, pedoconnective purple, +0.6–0.9 mm +prolonged below the thecae, glabrous, ventral appendages bilobed, apex obtuse, c. +0.4 mm +long, glabrous, thecae 7.1–7.6 × +1–1.1 mm +, falcate, purple, antepetalous with filaments white (during anthesis) or purple to reddish (in senescent flowers), +6.6–7.1 mm +long, glabrous, pedoconnective purple, +0.3–0.4 mm +prolonged below the thecae, glabrous, ventral appendages bilobed, apex obtuse, c. +0.5 mm +long, glabrous, thecae 6.4–6.7 × +1 mm +, falcate, purple; +ovary +5.5–6.1 × +4.9–5.2 mm +, 5-locular, apex densely sericeous, trichomes +0.5–1.3 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, appressed, the base linear, not immersed, not forked; +style +purple in the basal three-quarters and white in its apical portion (both during anthesis and in senescent flowers), +13.3–14.1 mm +long, apex curved, glabrous, stigma truncate. +Capsular fruits +6.3–8 × +6–8.1 mm +, sepals early deciduous, epicarp undivided when mature, ecostate. + + + + +Figure 1. + +Pleroma brevicomosum +F.S.Mey. & R.Goldenb. + +, +sp. nov. +A, Branch with inflorescence; B, surface of a young branch; C, leaf (adaxial surface); D, leaf (abaxial surface); E, detail of the leaf indument (adaxial surface); F, detail of the leaf indumentum (abaxial surface); G, bracteole (abaxial surface); H, flower bud and bracteoles; I, detail of the indument on the hypanthium (abaxial surface); J, antesepalous stamen with a glabrous filament; K, antesepalous stamen with a pair of trichomes on the filament; L, antepetalous stamen; M, detail of the two trichomes shown in K; N, detail of the connective and appendages shown in L; O, detail of the connective and appendages shown in J; P, ovary, detached from the hypanthium; Q, ovary apex; R, immature capsule without the deciduous sepals. All from the holotype, +Gonella +et al. 1425 (UPCB). Photographs: F. S. Meyer. + + + + +Figure 2. + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +in the field. A, Plant growing on quarZitic substrate; B, leaf pair (adaxial surfaces); C, inflorescence; D, flower (lateral view); E, immature capsules. Photographs: P. M. Gonella. + + + + +Distribution and habitat +. + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +was collected around the higher peaks of the João Pinto Formation, east +Minas Gerais +, Southeast +Brazil +( + +Figure 3 + +), in campos rupestres on sandy soil and quartzitic rock outcrops, as both terrestrial and rupicolous. The species was found at Serra do Padre Ângelo (municipality of Conselheiro Pena), in the Pico do Padre Ângelo, around +1480–1540 m +, and at the Pico do Sossego, around +1275 m +. It was also collected at the Pico da Aliança (municipality of Alvarenga), around +1400 m +. The species was found syntopic with other endemic taxa of the region, such as + +Drosera magnifica +Rivadavia & Gonella + +( +Droseraceae +; + +Gonella +et al. +, 2015 + +), + +Eremanthus ovatifolius +Loeuille & Pirani + +( +Asteraceae +; +Loeuille & Pirani, 2016 +), + +Lepidaploa campirupestris +Antar & Loeuille + +( +Asteraceae +; + +Antar +et al. +, 2021b + +) and + +Paepalanthus oreodoxus +Andrino & Gonella + +( +Eriocaulaceae +; +Andrino & Gonella, 2021 +). At the three localities, the species is syntopic with + +Pleroma caetanoi + +, described below. + + + + +Phenology +. Collected with flowers and fruits in May and July. + + + + +Proposed IUCN conservation category +. Critically Endangered: CR B1ab(iii). With estimates of EOO = +43.378 km +2 +and AOO = +12 km +2 +, + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +is isolated at the higher areas of the João Pinto Formation, and has a severely fragmented distribution, which hinders pollen and seed dispersal among the areas. The three areas where the species was found are under active invasion by African grasses, most remarkably + +Melinis minutiflora +P.Beauv. + +( +Poaceae +), which is found even in pristine areas that are not in direct contact with pastures, including the habitat of this species. The subpopulation at Pico do Padre Ângelo was directly affected by a catastrophic anthropogenic fire in early +October 2020 +, which also affected other endemics ( +Andrino & Gonella, 2021 +; + +Antar +et al. +, 2021b + +; +Kollmann & Gonella, 2021 +); post-fire resprout has not been monitored. At all sites, the populations of + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +are small and scattered, with fewer than 10 flowering individuals observed at each site during fieldwork. Based on the available data, the species is, therefore, preliminarily assessed as Critically Endangered according to IUCN criteria ( +IUCN, 2012 +). + + + + +Figure 3. +Distribution in Minas Gerais (MG), Brazil, of the four new species described in this article. BA, Bahia; ES, Espírito Santo; RJ, Rio de Janeiro. + + + + +Etymology +. The specific epithet, + +brevicomosum + +, is related to the indument with short trichomes on the hypanthium and leaves of this species. + + + + +Additional specimens examined +. + +BRAZIL +. + +Minas Gerais + +: Alvarenga, + +Pico +da Aliança + +, no topo do pico, +19°23′44.91′′S +, +41°40′13.52′′W +, + +1400 m + +, + +9 v 2021 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 2866 ( +MBML +, +UPCB +) + +; + +Conselheiro Pena, +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Serra do Pinhão +, subida para o +Pico do Sossego +, +19°14′23.33′′S +, +41°34′52.51′′W +, + +1275 m + +, + +2 v 2021 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 2524 ( +MBML +) + +. + + + + + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +is morphologically closely related to + +P. divaricatum + +; both occur in the state of +Minas Gerais +and are erect shrubs with sessile or almost sessile leaves, thyrsoid inflorescences, and flowers with setulose hypanthia and purple petals. + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +differs from + +P. divaricatum + +by the characters described in the diagnosis, and also by its larger hypanthia, 5.4–5.8 × +5–5.3 mm +(versus 2–2.3 × +2–2.4 mm +in + +P. divaricatum + +). + + + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +also resembles some species of + +Pleroma + +formerly recognised in + +Tibouchina +Aubl. sect. +Diotanthera +Triana + +( +sensu +Cogniaux, 1885 +, +1891 +), such as + +P. australe +Triana + +, + +P. cordifolium +(Cogn.) P.J.F.Guim. & Michelang. + +and + +P. mosenii +(Cogn.) P.J.F.Guim. & Michelang. + +, by its ovate leaves, thyrsoid inflorescences, setulose hypanthia, stamens with glabrous filaments and pedoconnectives, glabrous styles and ecostate fruits. + + + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +differs from + +P. australe + +by its terete branches (versus quadrangular in + +P. australe + +) and its smaller leaves, 2.2–4.3 × +1.9–2.9 cm +(versus 9.1–10.8 × +4.6–7.5 cm +), with crenulate margins (versus serrated), only 5 nerves (versus 7–9), and short petioles, +0.9–2 mm +long (versus elongate, +4.9–13.1 mm +long). It also differs from + +Pleroma australe + +by its smaller hypanthia, 5.4–5.8 × +5–5.3 mm +(versus 7.5–8.6 × +5.3–5.5 mm +); triangular, caducous (i.e. falling off immediately after anthesis) sepals, +4–4.3 mm +long (versus oblong, +5.6–7.1 mm +long sepals persisting on the hypanthium until the fruits are almost mature, then falling off when they are mature); and antesepalous stamens with a short pedoconnective, +0.6–0.9 mm +(versus +4–4.3 mm +long). + + + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +differs from + +P. cordifolium + +by its terete branches (versus quadrangular in + +P. cordifolium + +) and its smaller leaves, 2.2–4.3 × +1.9–2.9 cm +(versus 9–11.3 × +7.4–9.7 cm +), with crenulate margins (versus serrated), only 5 nerves (versus 9), and shorter petioles, +0.9–2 mm +long (versus +12–19.8 mm +long). It also differs from + +Pleroma cordifolium + +by its smaller hypanthia, 5.4–5.8 × +5–5.3 mm +(versus 7.7–7.9 × +4.6–5.9 mm +); antesepalous stamens with a short pedoconnective, +0.6–0.9 mm +(versus +5.7–6.4 mm +long); and ovary apex covered with eglandular trichomes (versus glandular). + + + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +differs from + +P. mosenii + +by its terete branches (versus quadrangular in + +P. mosenii + +) and its smaller leaves, 2.2–4.3 × +1.9–2.9 cm +(versus 7.5–11.6 × +4.6–8.7 cm +), with only 5 nerves (versus 9–11), and shorter petioles, +0.9–2 mm +long (versus +10.8–35.3 mm +long); antesepalous stamens with a short pedoconnective, +0.6–0.9 mm +(versus +4–4.5 mm +long); and smaller fruits, 6.3–8 × +6–8.1 mm +(versus 7.3–9.5 × +5–5.9 mm +), with caducous sepals (versus sepals persisting on the hypanthium until the fruits are almost mature, then falling off when they are mature). + + + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +is related to + +P. ackermannii +(Cogn.) P.J.F.Guim. & Michelang. + +by its strigose branches; its leaves with a short petiole ( +1.6–2.4 mm +long in + +P. ackermannii + +), with a brown (in dried specimens) and moderately strigose adaxial surface, and with 5 nerves; and also by its elliptic or ovate bracteoles, and its glabrous style. It differs from + +Pleroma ackermannii + +by its ovate leaves (versus elliptic), with a cordate base (versus obtuse), these being smaller, 2.2–4.3 × +1.9–2.9 cm +(versus 3.8–5 × +1.8–2.7 cm +); its bracteoles with the indument arranged along the entire abaxial surface (versus on only the central portion); its setulose hypanthia (versus sericeous); and its stamens with glabrous or sparsely setulose filaments (versus moderately villose). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C9/3706C9276D18FFA0FFD4FC4AFC2BF9AB.xml b/data/37/06/C9/3706C9276D18FFA0FFD4FC4AFC2BF9AB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..76eae062bc7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C9/3706C9276D18FFA0FFD4FC4AFC2BF9AB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,412 @@ + + + +Four new species of Pleroma (Melastomataceae) from campos rupestres and vegetation on granitic inselbergs in Eastern Minas Gerais, Brazil + + + +Author + +Goldenberg, R. +Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19031, 81531 - 970 Curitiba - PR, Brazil. E-mail: renato. goldenberg @ gmail. com. +renato.goldenberg@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Gonella, P. M. +Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Campus Sete Lagoas, 35701 - 970 Sete Lagoas - MG, Brazil. + + + +Author + +Meyer, F. S. +Herbarium UPCB and Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19031, 81531 - 970 - Curitiba, PR, Brazil. + +text + + +Edinburgh Journal of Botany + + +2022 + +2022-05-03 + + +79 + + +624 + + +1 +30 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.24823/ejb.2022.624 + +journal article +285461 +10.24823/EJB.2022.624 +861bd545-1470-46fa-9c50-4471dd689459 +1747-0036 +10523466 + + + + + +3. + +Pleroma miconiifolium +F.S.Mey. & R.Goldenb. + +, + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + +Pleroma miconiifolium + +differs from + +P. leopoldinense +L.Kollmann & R.Goldenb. + +by its leaves with shorter petioles, +4.6–9.1 mm +long (versus +15–45 mm +long in + +P. leopoldinense + +), pustulate on the adaxial surface (versus pustulate-strigose on the adaxial surface); and stamens in both cycles with the appendages covered with sparse glandular trichomes (versus appendages glabrous in both cycles). + + + +– Type: +Brazil +, +Minas Gerais +, +Santa Rita do Itueto +, +A.P.A. Municipal Pedra do Paredão +, +Pedra de Santa Rita +, na encosta do topo da pedra, +19°22′22.72′′S +, +41°21′28.70′′W +, + +1060 m + +, + +6 v 2021 + +, + +P.M. Gonella +, +D.P. Cordeiro +, +G.A. da Silva +, +P.R. Bartholomay +& +L. Medeiros + +2722 ( +holotype +UPCB +, + + +isotype +MBML +). + +Figures 7 +, +8 + + +. + + + + +Erect shrubs +1–1.5 m +tall, with sympodial growth, moderately branched. +Younger branches +terete, not winged, glabrous; +older branches +terete to quadrangular, not winged, glabrous, and basally decorticant; +nodes +slender. +Leaves +opposite; chartaceous, with distinct petioles, +4.6–9.1 mm +long; +blades +5.2–8.5 × +1.5–3.5 cm +, chartaceous, slightly discolorous, elliptic, base obtuse, apex acute, margins smooth or slightly crenulated, 5 acrodromous nerves, the midrib and the first lateral pair slightly suprabasal, basally joined on the abaxial surface by a minute membrane and resulting in a pair of pocket domatia, adaxial surface flat, dark green in dry specimens and in fresh material, sparsely pustulate, the minute trichome-like projections less than +0.1 mm +long, unbranched, erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, and nested within a tuft of minute, glandular, sessile projections, abaxial surface flat, yellowish green or light brown in dry specimens, light green in fresh material, sparsely strigose on the primary veins, trichomes +0.3–1.3 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, appressed, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, sparsely strigose on the surface, tertiary and quaternary veins, the minute trichome-like projections +0.1–0.3 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, appressed, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, and nested within a tuft of minute, glandular, sessile projections. +Thyrsoids +5–12.5 × +5–8.5 cm +, terminal, c.29–51 flowers, axis terete, glabrous, yellowish green to burgundy green; +bracts +late deciduous, leafy, with conspicuous petioles, +2.4–9.5 mm +long, blade 39.1–81.3 × +10.8–28.8 mm +, elliptic, indumentum the same as on the leaves; +bracteoles +early deciduous, 3.4–8.9 × +1.9–4.2 mm +, ovate, apex acute or obtuse, not covering the apex of the flower bud, margins entire, ciliate, both surfaces glabrous. +Flowers +5-merous, pedicels +1.1–2.2 mm +long; +hypanthium +4.4–6 × +4.3–5 mm +, obovate, not costate, sparsely pustulate, trichomes less than +0.1 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked; +sepals +late deciduous, 3–4.1 × +2.2–3 mm +, triangular, margins ciliate, apex acute, both surfaces glabrous; +petals +purple with a white base (during anthesis) or purple with a red base (in senescent flowers), 17–18.8 × +9.9–10.9 mm +, obovate, apex obtuse or truncate, ciliate; +stamens +10, slightly dimorphic, antesepalous with the filaments white on its lower half, and purple on its upper half (during anthesis) to totally purple or reddish (in senescent flowers), +7.6–8.4 mm +long, glabrous, pedoconnective purple, +0.9–1.3 mm +prolonged below the thecae, glabrous, ventral appendages bilobed, apex acute or cuspidate, c. +0.4 mm +long, sparsely setulose, trichomes c. +0.3 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, thecae 8–8.2 × +0.9–1.1 mm +, falcate, purple, antepetalous with the filaments white on its lower half, and purple on its upper half (during anthesis) to totally purple or reddish (in senescent flowers), +7–7.3 mm +long, glabrous or sparsely setulose on its upper half, trichomes c. +0.2 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, curved to erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, pedoconnective purple, +0.5–0.8 mm +prolonged below the thecae, glabrous, ventral appendages bilobed, apex acute or cuspidate, c. +0.3 mm +long, sparsely setulose, trichomes c. +0.3 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, thecae 7.6–7.8 × +0.7–0.8 mm +, falcate, purple; +ovary +4.5–4.9 × +3.2–3.7 mm +, 5-locular, apex sparsely setulose, trichomes +0.1–0.4 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, erect to curved, the base linear, not immersed, not forked; +style +purple, white only in the upper apical portion (during anthesis) and totally purple or reddish (in senescent flowers), +15.3–17 mm +long, apex curved, glabrous, stigma truncate. +Capsular fruits +7.7–9.1 × +5.6–6.7 mm +, sepals early deciduous, epicarp undivided when mature, ecostate. + + + + +Figure 7. + +Pleroma miconiifolium +F.S.Mey. & R.Goldenb. + +, +sp. nov. +A, Branch with inflorescence; B, surface of a young branch; C, leaf (adaxial surface); D, leaf (abaxial surface); E, detail of the adaxial surface; F, detail of the leaf indumentum (abaxial surface); G, detail of the leaf base (abaxial surface), with the two pocket domatia indicated by arrows; H, bracteole (adaxial surface); I, hypanthium and style in an old flower (the caducous calyx has already fallen at this stage); J, antesepalous stamen; K, antepetalous stamen; L, detail of the connective of the same antesepalous stamen shown in J, with two glandular trichomes attached; M, detail of the connective of the same antepetalous stamen shown in K, with two glandular trichomes attached; N, ovary, detached from the hypanthium; O, ovary apex, with sparse and short trichomes; P, immature capsule. All from the holotype, +Gonella +et al. 2722 (UPCB). Photographs: F. S. Meyer. + + + + +Figure 8. + +Pleroma miconiifolium + +in the field. A, Plant growing on granitic substrate; B, leaf (adaxial surface); C, leaf (abaxial surface); D, cyme, partial inflorescence; E, partial inflorescence; F, flower with damaged stamens, probably chewed by bees. Photographs: P. M. Gonella. + + + + +Distribution and habitat +. + +Pleroma miconiifolium + +was collected at the Environmental Protection Area Pedra do Paredão, a granitic inselberg with rupicolous vegetation surrounded by dense forests in the municipality of Santa Rita do Itueto (see + +Figure 3 + +). Individuals matching the morphology of the new species were also photographed at another inselberg named +Palestina +(Lucian Medeiros, Santa Rita do Itueto [Minas Gerais], personal communication), in the municipality of Pocrane (around +19°29′44.73′′S +, +41°38′6.18′′W +; a distance of +32 km +to the west); because these individuals were not collected, we did not include them in the distribution map or conservation assessment. At both sites, the species was found in small populations with scattered individuals. + +Pleroma miconiifolium + +is rupicolous, growing on shallow pockets of soil over exposed rock at elevations around +1000 m +. At the +type +locality, the species is syntopic with another endemic and recently described species, the bromeliad + +Orthophytum santaritense +Leme, S.Heller & Zizka + +( +Bromeliaceae +; + +Leme +et al. +, 2017 + +). + + + + +Phenology +. Collected and photographed with flowers in April and May. + + +Proposed IUCN conservation category +. Critically Endangered: CR B2ab(iii). Although this species has been collected only once, we avoided considering it Data Deficient (DD), because one of the authors (P.M.G.) had collected the single specimen at Pedra do Paredão. The author’s +in loco +assessment found the species to be under severe threat by the same factors listed for the + +Pleroma brevicomosum + +and + +P. caetanoi + +, that is, several anthropic activities (fires, motocross, trampling) and co-occurrence with invasive species, all of which occur in a landscape that is already greatly fragmented. + + + + +Etymology +. The specific epithet, + +miconiifolium + +, refers to the similarity of the leaves of this species to those of the genus + +Miconia +Ruiz & Pav. + +( +Melastomataceae +), which often have pocket domatia on their abaxial surface (see + +Bacci +et al. +, 2016 + +). + + + + + +Pleroma miconiifolium + +is morphologically closely related to + +P. leopoldinense + +; both have leaves with 5 nerves, and with domatia on the abaxial surface at the junction between the main nerves; additionally, the flowers in both have glabrous hypanthia, filaments and styles, and the petals are purple with a white base. + +Pleroma miconiifolium + +differs from + +P. leopoldinense + +by the characters described in the diagnosis, and also by its elliptic leaves (versus ovate to ovate-lanceolate leaves in + +P. leopoldinense + +); weakly dimorphic stamens, the antesepalous with shorter thecae, +8–8.2 mm +long (versus strongly dimorphic stamens, the antesepalous with thecae +11.5–12 mm +long); and shorter style, +15.3–17 mm +long (versus +20–22 mm +long). + + + +Pleroma miconiifolium + +is also related to + +P. vimineum +(D.Don) D.Don + +, both having elliptic, 5-nerved leaves, weakly dimorphic stamens with glabrous pedoconnectives, and glabrous style. + +Pleroma miconiifolium + +differs from + +P. vimineum + +by its leaves sparsely pustulate on the adaxial surface (versus moderately strigose in + +P. vimineum + +), with a pair of domatia on the abaxial surface (versus lacking domatia), sparsely pustulate hypanthia (versus moderately strigose), and glabrous filaments (versus basally moderately setulose). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/06/C9/3706C9276D1EFFBCFFD4FE90FC70FC62.xml b/data/37/06/C9/3706C9276D1EFFBCFFD4FE90FC70FC62.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5f2d2330818 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/06/C9/3706C9276D1EFFBCFFD4FE90FC70FC62.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1113 @@ + + + +Four new species of Pleroma (Melastomataceae) from campos rupestres and vegetation on granitic inselbergs in Eastern Minas Gerais, Brazil + + + +Author + +Goldenberg, R. +Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19031, 81531 - 970 Curitiba - PR, Brazil. E-mail: renato. goldenberg @ gmail. com. +renato.goldenberg@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Gonella, P. M. +Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Campus Sete Lagoas, 35701 - 970 Sete Lagoas - MG, Brazil. + + + +Author + +Meyer, F. S. +Herbarium UPCB and Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19031, 81531 - 970 - Curitiba, PR, Brazil. + +text + + +Edinburgh Journal of Botany + + +2022 + +2022-05-03 + + +79 + + +624 + + +1 +30 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.24823/ejb.2022.624 + +journal article +285461 +10.24823/EJB.2022.624 +861bd545-1470-46fa-9c50-4471dd689459 +1747-0036 +10523466 + + + + + +2. + +Pleroma caetanoi +F.S.Mey. & R.Goldenb. + +, + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + +Pleroma caetanoi + +differs from + +P. decemcostatum +(Cogn.) P.J.F.Guim. & Michelang. + +by its shorter petioles, +1.2–3.6 mm +long (versus +4.2–13.8 mm +long in + +P. decemcostatum + +) and its concolorous leaves (versus discolorous), these being scabrose on the adaxial surface (versus sericeous) and pilose on the abaxial surface (versus villose). + + + + + +– Type: +Brazil +, +Minas Gerais +, +Conselheiro Pena +, +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Serra da Palha Branca +, afloramento quartZítico atravessado por estrada que sai do mirante da Bela, +19°20′13.4′′S +, +41°33′27.6′′W +, + +1030 m + +, + +30 i 2021 + +, + +P.M. Gonella +, +D.P. Cordeiro +, +G.A. da Silva +, +P.R. Bartholomay +& +J.C. Ribeiro + +1920 ( +holotype +UPCB +, + + +isotype +MBML +). + +Figures 4 +, +5 +, +6 + + +. + + + + +Erect shrubs +0.7–2 m +tall, with sympodial growth, poorly (in younger plants) to moderately (in older plants) branched. +Younger branches +terete to quadrangular, not winged, moderately to densely setulose, trichomes +0.3–1.4 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, curved, the base slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked; +older branches +quadrangular, angulose, with indument similar to younger branches, but deciduous, and basally decorticant; +nodes +slender. +Leaves +opposite; chartaceous, with petioles very short, +1.2–3.6 mm +long; +blades +2–8.2 × +1.7–4.8 cm +, chartaceous, concolorous, ovate to orbiculate, lacking domatia on the abaxial surface, base cordate, apex acute to obtuse, margins crenulate, 5–7 acrodromous nerves, the marginals tenuous, adaxial surface flat, dark green or brown in dry specimens, dark green in fresh material, moderately to densely scabrous, trichomes +0.7–2.7 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, curved, the base strongly broadened, not immersed, not forked, abaxial surface flat, light brown in dry specimens, light green to whitish green in fresh material, moderately setose to strigose on the primary and secondary veins, trichomes +0.4–2.6 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, appressed or curved, the base slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked, densely pilose on the surface, tertiary and quaternary veins, trichomes +0.2–0.7 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked. +Thyrsoids +6.5–21 × +7–15 cm +, terminal, c.59–140 flowers, axis quadrangular, moderately setulose to setose, trichomes +0.3–1.4 mm +long, unbranched, both eglandular and glandular, curved to erect, the base slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked, reddish; +bracts +late deciduous, leafy, petioles short, +1–2.4 mm +long, blade 15.6–62.3 × +11.8–39.4 mm +, ovate to orbiculate, indumentum the same as on the leaves; +bracteoles +early deciduous, 4.2–7.5 × +1.9–3.7 mm +, ovate, apex acute, not covering the apex of the flower bud, margins entire, ciliate, adaxial surface glabrous, abaxial surface moderately setose or setulose, with indument uniformly arranged along the entire abaxial surface, trichomes +0.3–2.1 mm +long, unbranched, both eglandular and glandular, curved, the base linear or slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked. +Flowers +5-merous, pedicels +0.7–1.4 mm +long; +hypanthium +3.2–4.3 × +2.7–3.7 mm +, obovate, not costate, moderately to densely sericeous, trichomes +0.7–2.1 mm +long, unbranched, both eglandular and glandular, appressed, the base linear to slightly broadened, not immersed, not forked; +sepals +late deciduous, 3.7–4.2 × +2–2.5 mm +, triangular, margins ciliate, apex acute, adaxial surface glabrous, abaxial surface with the same trichomes as the hypanthium, distributed over the entire surface; +petals +purple with a white base (during anthesis) or purple with a red base (in senescent flowers), 17–21.2 × +17.5–19.6 mm +, obovate, apex obtuse or truncate, ciliate; +stamens + + + +Figure 4. + +Pleroma caetanoi +F.S.Mey. & R.Goldenb. + +, +sp. nov. +A, Branch with inflorescence; B, surface of a young branch; C, leaf (adaxial surface); D, leaf (abaxial surface); E, detail of the leaf indument (adaxial surface); F, detail of the leaf indumentum (abaxial surface); G, bracteole (abaxial surface); H, flower without petals; I, detail of the indument on the hypanthium (abaxial surface); J, antesepalous stamen; K, detail of the setulose filament shown in J; L, antepetalous stamen; M, detail of the setulose filament shown in L; N, detail of the connective and appendages covered with glandular trichomes shown in J; O, detail of the glabrous connective and appendages shown in L; P, ovary, detached from the hypanthium; Q, ovary apex; R, immature capsule. All from the holotype, +Gonella +et al. 1920 (UPCB). Photographs: F. S. Meyer. + + + + +Figure 5. + +Pleroma caetanoi + +in the field. A, Plant growing on campos rupestres; B, young branch with almost sessile leaves; C, leaf (adaxial surface); D, leaf (abaxial surface); E, inflorescence (lateral view); F, flowers; G, detail of the stamens and style; H, part of the inflorescence with an immature capsule (in the centre of the cyme), and floral buds. Photographs: P. M. Gonella. + + + + +Figure 6. + +Pleroma caetanoi + +in the field. A, Specimen with purple petals (the most frequent pattern); B, specimen with white petals (less frequent). Photographs: P. M. Gonella. + + + +10, strongly dimorphic, antesepalous with the filaments white or rosy on its apex (during anthesis) to reddish (in senescent flowers), +4.8–5.8 mm +long, moderately setulose on the basal two-thirds, trichomes +0.2–0.5 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, curved, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, pedoconnective white, +0.9–1 mm +prolonged below the thecae, moderately setulose, seldom glabrous, trichomes +0.1–0.3 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, ventral appendages bilobed, apex obtuse, c. +0.1 mm +long, glabrous or moderately setulose, trichomes c. +0.1 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, thecae 4.9–5.4 × +0.3–0.4 mm +, falcate, purple, antepetalous with the filaments white (during anthesis) or rosy to reddish (in senescent flowers), +3.8–4.1 mm +long, moderately setulose on its basal portion, trichomes +0.2–0.5 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, curved, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, pedoconnective white, +0.3–0.5 mm +prolonged below the thecae, glabrous, ventral appendages bilobed, apex obtuse, c. +0.2 mm +long, glabrous, thecae 4.6–4.9 × +0.7–0.9 mm +, falcate, white; +ovary +4.8–5.1 × +3.6–3.8 mm +, 5-locular, apex densely sericeous, trichomes +0.5–1.3 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, appressed, the base linear, not immersed, not forked; +style +white (during anthesis and in senescent flowers), +5.4–6 mm +long, apex curved, sparsely to moderately pilose on the basal two-thirds, trichomes +0.3–1 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, curved, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, stigma truncate. +Capsular fruits +5.9–8.3 × +4.3–5.1 mm +, sepals late deciduous, epicarp undivided when mature, costate. + + + + +Distribution and habitat +. + +Pleroma caetanoi + +is endemic to the campos rupestres of the João Pinto Formation, being recorded from several fragments in this region (see + +Figure 3 + +). It has been found in the Serra do Padre Ângelo, including Pico do Padre Ângelo, Serra do Pinhão and Serra da Palha Branca; Pico da Aliança; Serra da Onça, within Sete Salões State Park; and also at smaller fragments in the south of the municipality of Conselheiro Pena. The species grows on sandy soils on quartzitic outcrops, both as terrestrial and rupicolous, at elevations from +750 m +to +1550 m +. + + + + +Phenology +. The species was collected or recorded with flowers and fruits year-round, except in March. + + + + +Proposed IUCN conservation category +. Endangered: EN B1ab(iii) + B2ab(iii). Both the estimates for EOO = +310.907 km +2 +and AOO = +48 km +2 +meet the criteria for Endangered, which is also supported by the fragmented distribution. Despite being the most widespread of the species here described, + +Pleroma caetanoi + +was observed under the greater variety of threats, including invasive species ( + +Melinis minutiflora + +; + +Pteridium aquilinum + +(L.) Kuhn, +Dennstaedtiaceae +; + +Urochloa +sp. + +, +Poaceae +), anthropic fires, human interference (motocross, trampling), clearance for smallholder grazing and silviculture, and presence of cattle in the habitat. The species was collected in a protected area, the Sete Salões State Park ( +Brotto & VÖltz +4410). Given the restricted occurrence and the threats listed, the species is assessed as Endangered based on the criteria of the IUCN ( +IUCN, 2012 +). + + + + +Etymology +. The name of this species honours Ednilson Caetano, who resides at the Serra do Padre Ângelo, where the species was first discovered. Ednilson and his family have kindly received in their home and guided in the Serra many botanists over the past decade, sharing their invaluable knowledge about the region and its plants, and participating in the discovery of many novelties from the area (see acknowledgements in + +Gonella +et al. +, 2015 + +; +Mello-Silva, 2018 +; +Kollmann, 2020 +; +Andrino & Gonella, 2021 +; + +Antar +et al. +, 2021a + +, +2021b +; +Kollmann & Gonella, 2021 +). + + + + +Additional specimens examined +. + +BRAZIL +. + +Minas Gerais + +: +Alvarenga +, +Pico da Aliança +, no topo do pico, +19°23′43.87′′S +, +41°40′8.54′′W +, + +1435 m + +, + +9 v 2021 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 2895 ( +MBML +, +UPCB +) + +; + +Conselheiro Pena +, +Pico do Padre Ângelo +, subida ao pico, +19°18′40.5′′S +, +41°34′31.5′′W +, + +1200 m + +, + +16 xii 2016 + +, + +J +. +C +. Lopes + +et al. 449 ( +SPF 00227284 +– image!) + +; + +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Pico do Padre Ângelo +, no platô do topo do +Pico +, +19°19′14.2′′S +, +41°34′43.7′′W +, + +1530 m + +, + +11 vi 2017 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 796 ( +SPF +) + +; + +Chapada do +João Pinto +, mirante +da Bela Adormecida +, +19°20′5′′S +, +41°33′50.3′′W +, + +18 iv 2018 + +, + +L +. +J +. +C +. Kollmann & +R +. Cipriano + +13495 ( +MBML 52967 +) + +; + +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Córrego da Regina +, aos pés da +Serra do Pinhão +, +19°16′30.1′′S +, +41°33′29.7′′W +, + +755 m + +, + +3 xii 2018 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 953 ( +MBML +) + +; + +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Pico do Padre Ângelo +, trilha para o topo, +19°18′25.4′′S +41°34′41.7′′W +, + +1000 m + +, + +4 xii 2018 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 970 ( +MBML +) + +; + +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Pico do Padre Ângelo +, no platô do topo do +Pico +, +19°19′6.9′′S +, +41°34′43.8′′W +, + +1400–1500 m + +, + +4 xii 2018 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 1081 ( +MBML +) + +; + +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Pico do Padre Ângelo +, no primeiro platô, com presença de velóZias gigantes, +19°18′41.24′′S +, +41°34′30.83′′W +, + +1220 m + +, + +8 vi 2020 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 1206 ( +MBML +, +UPCB +) + +; + +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Serra da Palha Branca +, acessível a partir do +Mirante da Bela Adormecida +, +19°20′19.51′′S +, +41°33′26.26′′W +, + +1080 m + +, + +9 vi 2020 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 1288 ( +MBML +, +UPCB +) + +; + +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, Boa Vista, crista + + +sul do +Pico do Padre Ângelo +, +19°19′55.42′′S +, +41°34′24.82′′W +, + +950 m + +, + +9 vi 2020 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 1346 ( +MBML +, +UPCB +) + +; + +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Serra da Palha Branca +, + +Pedra +da Antena + +, aflormanto rochoso com antena no topo, +19°20′41.2′′S +, +41°32′48.3′′W +, + +1200 m + +, + +19 viii 2020 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 1497 ( +MBML +) + +; afloramento quartZítico próximo a Vista Alegre (distrito de Alvarenga), +19°23′49.6′′S +, +41°33′26.4′′W +, + + +920 m + +, + +4 x 2020 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 1799 ( +MBML +, +UPCB +) + +; + +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Pico do Padre + + +Ângelo, primeiro platô, +19°18′45.84′′S +, +41°34′38.13′′W +, + +1260 m + +, + +14 xi 2020 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 1719 ( +MBML +) + +; + +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Pico do Padre Ângelo +, platô do topo do pico, afloramento da face sul, +19°19′12.78′′S +, +41°34′42.02′′W +, + +1515 m + +, + +30 xi 2020 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella & D. +P +. Cordeiro + +1832 ( +MBML +) + +; + +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Serra do Pinhão +, acima da cachoeira do Diabo, +19°16′22.5′′S +, +41°34′42.27′′W +, + +990 m + +, + +31 i 2021 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 1991 ( +MBML +, +UPCB +) + +; + +afloramento quartZítico próximo a Vista Alegre (distrito +de Alvarenga +), +19°23′43.98′′S +, +41°33′33.64′′W +, + +920 m + +, + +1 ii 2021 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 2023 ( +MBML +, +UPCB +) + +; + +Serra do Padre Ângelo +, +Serra do Pinhão +, subida para o +Pico do Sossego +, +19°13′42.77′′S +, +41°34′22.33′′W +, + +1070 m + +, + +1 v 2021 + +, + +P +. +M +. Gonella + +et al. 2402 ( +MBML +, +UPCB +) + +; + +Parque Estadual de Sete Salões +, +19°16′50′′S +, +41°22′22′′W +, + +833 m + +, + +7 viii 2021 + +, + +M +. +L +Brotto & +R +. +R +. VÖltz + +4410 ( +MBM +) + +. + + + + + +Pleroma caetanoi + +is related to the species classically assigned to + +Tibouchina +sect. +Pleroma +(D.Don) Cogn. + +( +sensu +Cogniaux, 1885 +, +1891 +), especially to the group of species with the appendages and pedoconnectives of the antesepalous stamens covered by glandular trichomes, and recognised by + +Meyer +et al. +(2016 + +, +2018 +) as the “ + +Pleroma heteromallum +(D.Don) D.Don + +complex”. Within this group, + +Pleroma caetanoi + +is more closely related to species that have branches that lack wings, leaves that are sessile or with short petioles and have a cordate base, a hypanthium that is covered with glandular trichomes, and a style that is pilose in its lower portion (according to the identification key by +Cogniaux, 1885 +, +1891 +). Because of the costate fruits, we believe that + +Pleroma caetanoi + +is closer to + +P. decemcostatum + +, which also occurs in the state of +Minas Gerais +. Both species are erect shrubs with ovate leaves, thyrsoid inflorescences with the axis covered with glandular and eglandular trichomes, ovate bracteoles, and the petals purple with a white base. They also have stamens with setulose filaments, the antesepalous ones with the pedoconnectives and appendages covered with glandular trichomes (rarely glabrous in + +Pleroma caetanoi + +), and pilose style. + +Pleroma caetanoi + +differs from + +P. decemcostatum + +by the characters described in the diagnosis, and by the leaves that are pilose on the abaxial surface (versus villose in + +P. decemcostatum + +). + + + +Pleroma caetanoi + +also resembles + +P. costatocalyx +F.S.Mey., L.Kollmann & R.Goldenb. ( + +Meyer +et al. +, 2016 + +) + +by its ovate leaves, thyrsoid inflorescences, ovate bracteoles, petals purple with a white base, stamens with setulose filaments, the antesepalous ones with pedoconnectives and appendages covered with glandular trichomes, pilose style, and costate fruits. + +Pleroma caetanoi + +differs from + +P. costatocalyx + +by its shorter petioles, +1.2–3.6 mm +long (versus +3.6–11.8 mm +long in + +P. costatocalyx + +), and by its leaves scabrous on the abaxial surface (versus sericeous), with trichomes not forked at the base (versus trichomes several-forked at the base). + + + +Pleroma caetanoi + +is related to + +P. petrophylax +F.S.Mey. & R.Goldenb. + +This relationship is discussed in the diagnosis and notes for + +Pleroma petrophylax + +, given below. + + +Most of the studied specimens of + +Pleroma caetanoi + +presented flowers with purple petals, but the petals may be white in few specimens ( +P.M. Gonella +et al. 970; see + +Figure 6 + +). This same variation in petal colour can also be found in other species of the genus, such as + +Pleroma echinatum +Gardner + +[which includes the synonyms + +Tibouchina gardneriana +(Triana) Cogn. + +, with pink or purple petals, and + +Tibouchina alba +Cogn. + +, with white petals; according to + +Guimarães +et al. +, 2019 + +] and + +P. boraceiense +(Brade) P.J.F.Guim. & Justino + +, with purple petals in the state of +São Paulo +, and white petals in +Minas Gerais +( + +Justino +et al. +, 2018 + +). + + +A photograph of + +Pleroma caetanoi + +was published by +Mello-Silva (2018) +while the species had yet to be described. The beautiful image of the Serra do Padre Ângelo in figure 1 includes in the foreground some flowering individuals of + +Pleroma caetanoi + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/07/29/37072984902BA29AC96122BB55D4968F.xml b/data/37/07/29/37072984902BA29AC96122BB55D4968F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f0f84e6df9c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/07/29/37072984902BA29AC96122BB55D4968F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Campanula erinoides +, +spec. nov. + + + + +30. Campanula caule dichotomo, foliis sessilibus utrinque dentatis. +Hort. cliff. 65. Roy. lugdb. 247. Guett. stamp. 2. p.429. + + +Rapunculus minor, foliis incisis. +Bauh. pin.92. + + +Erini s. Rapunculi minimum genus. +Column. phytob. 122. t.28. + + +Alsine oblongo folio serrato, flore caeruleo. +Bauh. hist. 3. p.367. + + + + +Habitat in +Italia +, +Galloprovincia +, +Monspelii +. ☉ + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/07/40/370740EA691258498481CB483889DB19.xml b/data/37/07/40/370740EA691258498481CB483889DB19.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..88b28da4980 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/07/40/370740EA691258498481CB483889DB19.xml @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + +The aquatic Adephaga of the Makay, central-western Madagascar, with description of two new diving beetle species (Coleoptera, Gyrinidae, Haliplidae, Noteridae, Dytiscidae) + + + +Author + +Ramahandrison, Andriamirado Tahina +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0833-8730 +Departement de Biologie et Ecologie Vegetales, Faculte des Sciences, BP 906, Universite d'Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar & Sorbonne Universite, Institut de Systematique, Evolution, Biodiversite (UMR 7205), MNHN SU CNRS EPHE UA, Case 05, 7 quai St Bernard, Paris, France + + + +Author + +Rakouth, Bakolimalala +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-2006 +Departement de Biologie et Ecologie Vegetales, Faculte des Sciences, BP 906, Universite d'Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar + + + +Author + +Manuel, Michael +Sorbonne Universite, Institut de Systematique, Evolution, Biodiversite (UMR 7205), MNHN SU CNRS EPHE UA, Case 05, 7 quai St Bernard, Paris, France +manuel1570@yahoo.fr + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2022 + +2022-11-02 + + +1127 + + +1 +60 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1127.85737 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1127.85737 +1313-2970-1127-1 +4759AFC32EFD47A7853F645FB32829BA +D72971CE12A85992AFFD69F186474E85 + + + + + +Liodessus luteopictus ( +Regimbart +, 1897) + + + + + +Liodessus poecilopterus += +L. poecilopterus +Regimbart +, 1900. + + + +Type locality. +Mascarene Islands, Mauritius, Curepipe. + + +Material examined. + +1 ♂ +: MAK-16. + + + +Distribution. + +Mauritius, La +Reunion +, Comoros, Madagascar ( +Guignot 1959-1961 +; +Bameul 1984 +; + +Bistroem +1988b + +). In Madagascar, widespread. + + + +Habitat in study area. + +This species was sampled at a single inner massif site, a small pond, partly shaded, at the edge of a gallery forest close to River Andranomanintsy. The water was slowly renewed from the nearby river, the bottom was sandy with moderate plant debris and the water was clear. This small water body was filled in with subaquatic +Poaceae +including a + +Panicum + +species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/07/EF/3707EF03FF81121D9EEE044E4FB66662.xml b/data/37/07/EF/3707EF03FF81121D9EEE044E4FB66662.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f5dbad6d481 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/07/EF/3707EF03FF81121D9EEE044E4FB66662.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part R) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +785 +805 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Rubus caesius +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +1 + +: 493. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Europae dumetis." RCN: 3759. + + + + +Lectotype +(van de Beek in +Meded. Bot. Mus. Herb. Rijks Univ. Utrecht +415: 111. 1974): Herb. Linn. No. 653.7 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + +Rubus caesius +L. + +( +Rosaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/08/02/370802DE1894541F8F5F500876CFFF2F.xml b/data/37/08/02/370802DE1894541F8F5F500876CFFF2F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fd59c7926c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/08/02/370802DE1894541F8F5F500876CFFF2F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,394 @@ + + + +Four new species of Sphaeroderma Stephens (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae, Alticini) from Taiwan, with discussion on genus boundaries based on S. flavonotatum Chujo and S. jungchani sp. nov. + + + +Author + +Lee, Chi-Feng +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1996-0557 +Applied Zoology Division, Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute, Taichung 413, Taiwan +chifeng@tari.gov.tw + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2023 + +2023-11-27 + + +1185 + + +1 +19 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1185.112099 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1185.112099 +1313-2970-1185-1 +5B12796B210249948D3353FAD1A1B763 +99994BD90C195466A249943D2E939FB4 + + + + +Sphaeroderma hsui +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 2A +, 3 +, 4 + + + +Types. + +Holotype +♂ (TARI). Taiwan: Miaoli, Hsiaopangchih (小胖池), 28.VIII.2021-16.XI.2021, leg. Y.-F. Hsu. + +Paratypes +. + +29♂, 22♀ (TARI: 26♂, 19♀; BMNH: 3♂, 3♀), same data as holotype; 4♂, 2♀ (TARI), same but with +"28.VIII.2021" +; 2♂, 3♀ (TARI), same but with +"21.V.-28.VIII.2021" +; 1♀ (TARI): Hsishihshan (西勢山), 16.XI.2021-21.IV.2022, leg. Y.-F. Hsu. + + + +Figure 2. +Heads of + +Sphaeroderma + +species in frontal view +A + +S. hsui + +sp. nov. +B + +S. changi + +sp. nov. +C + +S. sheipaensis + +sp. nov. +D + +S. flavonotatum + +Chujo +E + +S. jungchani + +sp. nov. + + + + +Description. + +Length 2.5-2.8 mm, width 1.6-1.9 mm. Body color (Fig. +3A-C +) yellowish-brown. Antennae filiform in males (Fig. +4A +), antennomeres VIII-X wider, length ratios of antennomeres I-XI 1.0:0.6:0.4:0.5:0.7:0.6:0.7:0.8:0.7:0.7:1.0, length to width ratios of antennomeres I-XI 2.9:2.1:1.8:2.0:2.5:2.4:2.5:2.6:2.3:2.3:3.0; similar shape in females (Fig. +4B +), but antennomeres VIII-X narrower, length ratios of antennomeres I-XI 1.0:0.6:0.4:0.5:0.8:0.6:0.8:0.7:0.7:0.7:1.0, length to width ratios of antennomeres I-XI 3.1:2.3:1.9:2.2:3.2:2.6:2.9:2.5:2.4:2.2:3.3. Antennal calli longitudinal, with supracallinal sulci poorly delimited. Pronotum 1.7-1.9 +x +wider than long, disc with fine, scattered punctures, same size as punctures on elytra; lateral margins almost straight; anterolateral callosity protruding forward; posterolateral callosity poorly developed. Elytra 1.3 times longer than wide, sides widely rounded; disc with punctures entirely confused; humeral calli well developed. Abdominal ventrite V without internal median ridge in both sexes. Male genitalia: aedeagus (Fig. +4C, D +) slender in dorsal view, 4.0 +x +longer than wide; parallel-sided, but slightly narrowed at apical 1/4, apex widely rounded; moderately curved at middle in lateral view, apex slightly recurved, ventral margin with densely, tiny teeth at middle; ostium membranous and with Y-shaped sclerotized area. Female genitalia: ventrite VIII (Fig. +4E +) with apical part triangular, apical margin smooth and lacking setae, disc with medial part membranous, spiculum short; gonocoxae (Fig. +4G +) separated, transversely triangular, with dense, long setae along apical margins, with one slender and transverse basal sclerite; receptacle of spermatheca (Fig. +4F +) moderately swollen; pump short and strongly curved, transverse wrinkles present on entire pump and extending into half of receptacle; sclerotized proximal spermathecal duct long, with ramus oblong. + + + +Figure 3. +Habitus of + +Sphaeroderma hsui + +sp. nov. +A +typical form, male, dorsal view +B +ditto, ventral view +C +ditto, lateral view +D +color variation, male, dorsal view +E +ditto, ventral view +F +ditto, lateral view +G +color variation, female, dorsal view +H +ditto, ventral view +I +ditto, lateral view. + + + + +Figure 4. +Diagnostic characters of + +Sphaeroderma hsui + +sp. nov. +A +antenna, male +B +antenna, female +C +aedeagus, dorsal view +D +aedeagus, lateral view +E +abdominal ventrite VIII, female +F +spermatheca +G +gonocoxae. + + + + +Color variation. + +Some adults have black bodies (Fig. +3D-F +) with legs and antennae that are yellowish-brown, with metafemora darkener; some adults (Fig. +3G-I +) similar in this color form, but the elytra are yellowish-brown except darker base that extends to lateral margins, then abbreviated at apical 1/3. + + + +Diagnosis. + +Although adults of + +Sphaeroderma hsui + +sp. nov. display diverse color patterns (Fig. +3 +), they are characteristic and diagnostic. In addition, this new species differs from the two other Taiwanese species ( + +S. changi + +sp. nov. and + +S. sheipaensis + +sp. nov.) based the following combination characters: entire yellowish-brown antennae (Fig. +3 +) [yellowish-brown antennomeres I-IV and black antennomeres V-XI in other species (Fig. +5 +)]; longitudinal antennal calli with poorly delimited supracallinal sulci (Fig. +2A +) [transverse antennal calli with well-developed supracallinal sulci in + +S. changi + +sp. nov. (Fig. +2B +) and + +S. sheipaensis + +sp. nov. (Fig. +2C +)]; slender aedeagus, 4.0 +x +longer than wide, with cluster of setae at middle of inner margin in lateral view (Fig. +4D +) [wide aedeagus, 3.1 +x +longer than wide, and inner margin lacking setae in lateral view in + +S. changi + +sp. nov. (Fig. +6D +)]; triangular abdominal ventrite VIII in females with apical margin lacking setae, subapically and moderately narrowed sides (Fig. +4E +) [apical margin with seven pairs of setae at medial part in + +S. changi + +sp. nov. (Fig. +6E +), subapically and slightly narrowed sides in + +S. changi + +sp. nov. and + +S. sheipaensis + +sp. nov. (Figs +6E +, +7E +)]; transversely triangular gonocoxae (Fig. +4G +) [longitudinally triangular gonocoxae in + +S. changi + +sp. nov. (Fig. +6G +)]. + + + +Figure 5. +Habitus of + +Sphaeroderma changi + +sp. nov. and + +S. sheipaensis + +sp. nov. +A + +S. changi + +sp. nov., female, dorsal view +B +ditto, ventral view +C +ditto, lateral view +D + +S. sheipaensis + +sp. nov., female, dorsal view +E +ditto, ventral view +F +ditto, lateral view. + + + + +Figure 6. +Diagnostic characters of + +Sphaeroderma changi + +sp. nov. +A +antenna, male +B +antenna, female +C +aedeagus, dorsal view +D +aedeagus, lateral view +E +abdominal ventrite VIII, female +F +spermatheca +G +gonocoxae. + + + + +Figure 7. +Diagnostic characters of + +Sphaeroderma sheipaensis + +sp. nov. and + +S. jungchani + +Lee, sp. nov. +A +antenna, male, + +S. jungchani + +sp. nov. +B +antenna, female, + +Sphaeroderma sheipaensis + +sp. nov. +C +aedeagus, dorsal view, + +S. jungchani + +sp. nov. +D +ditto, lateral view +E +abdominal ventrite VIII, female, + +S. sheipaensis + +sp. nov. +F +spermatheca, + +S. sheipaensis + +sp. nov. +G +gonocoxae, + +S. sheipaensis + +sp. nov. + + + + +Etymology. +The name is dedicated to Dr Yu-Feng Hsu (徐堉峰), who is the director for the insect survey project at Shei-Pa National Park. + + +Distribution. + + +Sphaeroderma hsui + +sp. nov. seems to be the dominant species at the Shei-Pa National Park. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/08/09/370809E8E786CB68F9151A9ECF8E2E39.xml b/data/37/08/09/370809E8E786CB68F9151A9ECF8E2E39.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..961a9f489af --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/08/09/370809E8E786CB68F9151A9ECF8E2E39.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part P) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +718 +782 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Phyllanthus grandifolius +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 981. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in America." RCN: 7109. + + + + +Lectotype +(Webster in +J. Arnold Arbor +. 37: 10. 1956): Herb. Clifford: 440, + +Phyllanthus + +3 ( +BM +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + +Phyllanthus grandifolius +L. + +( +Euphorbiaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/08/87/370887ECFFD3FFACFF0410F229D9F965.xml b/data/37/08/87/370887ECFFD3FFACFF0410F229D9F965.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b696a74f6e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/08/87/370887ECFFD3FFACFF0410F229D9F965.xml @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ + + + +Simopone yunnanensis sp. nov. – the first record of Simopone Forel, 1891 from China (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Cerapachyinae) + + + +Author + +Zhilin Chen + + + +Author + +Shanyi Zhou + + + +Author + +Liwei Liang + +text + + +Asian Myrmecology + + +2015 + +7 + + +5 +10 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.33937 +1985-1944 + + + + + + +Simopone yunnanensis + +sp. nov. + +( + +Figs. +1-4 + +) + + + + + +Measurements & indices of +holotype +worker. + +TL +5.27 +, HL +0.93 +, HW +0.65 +, SL +0.20 +, EW +0.21 +, ES +0.23 +, SW +0.12 +, FCW +0.34 +, EL +0.26 +, PW +0.50 +, AIIW +0.52 +, AIIL +0.63 +, AIIIW +0.57 +, AIIIL +0.58 +, WL +1.27 +, PL +0.65 +, PH +0.41 +, DPW +0.50 +, MFL +0.50 +, CI +70 +, SI +31 +, EL/HW +0.40 +, EP +1.17 +, AIIW/ AIIL +0.83 +, AIIIW/AIIIL +0.98 +. + + +In full-face view head nearly rectangular, longer than broad, sides weakly convex behind eyes, and shallowly concave in front of eyes; posterior margin distinctly concave, posterior corners angular. Mandibles subtriangular, masticatory margin finely dentate. Anterior margin of clypeus bluntly angled, dorsum without median carina. Frontal carinae not elevated, widely separated and weakly divergent posteriorly, extending beyond anterior margins of eyes, frontal area broad. Antennae +11 +-segmented, scapes short, but quite broad apically, not beyond anterior margin of eye. Head with short, narrow and deep scrobes extending from the antennal socket to the anterior margin of the eye. Eyes large, occupying about +1 +/ +3 +length of head side, located about at midlength of head side, outer margin of eye almost reaching to head sides. Ocelli present, minute and closely approximated. + +Dorsum of mesosoma weakly convex, weakly and narrowly depressed at promesonotal suture. Posterodorsal corner of propodeum bluntly angled, lateral borders of declivity lowly carinate. Dorsum of petiole moderately convex, anteroventral process a distinct recurved hook or spur. Postpetiole longer and higher than petiole, dorsum moderately convex. Constriction behind postpetiole distinct. + +In dorsal view lateral margins of mesosoma weakly marginate, narrowest across mesonotum (maximum width +0.46 +), and broadest across propodeum (maximum width +0.50 +). Pronotum with sharp anterior carina and acute humeral corners, sides weakly convergent posteriorly. Promesonotal suture slightly anteriorly curved, represented by short longitudinal rugae. Metanotal groove absent. Petiole ( +AII +) longer than broad ( +AIIW +/ +AIIL +0.83 +), with a strong anterior carina, sides almost straight, distinctly marginate and weakly widening posteriorly. Postpetiole ( +AIII +) almost square, as broad as long, sides almost straight and parallel. + +Body surface smooth and shining. Mandibles, head and mesosoma with scattered minute piligerous punctures. Body dorsum with very sparse suberect short hairs. Scapes and tibiae with very sparse suberect hairs, flagella with abundant suberect hairs and decumbent pubescence. Gastral apex with abundant long hairs. Body color black. Mandibles and clypeus reddish brown. Antennae and legs yellowish brown. + + + + + +Holotype +worker +. + +China +: +Yunnan Province +, +Yingjiang County +, +Jiemao +, + +July 31, 2005 + +, +Zhao Tan +leg., + +No. +7005 + + +. + + + + +Etymology. +The new species is named + +after its type-locality, Yunnan. + + + +Comparison Notes. + +S. yunnanensis + +sp. nov +belongs to the + +grandidieri + +species group. So far this group covers seven species, four of them from the Oriental and Malesian region. The new species is most allied to + +S. oculata +Radchenko + +, but distinctly differs from the latter. In + +Simopone yunnanensis + +sp. nov. +, anterior margin of clypeus bluntly angled; metanotal groove absent; in dorsal view petiole weakly widening posteriorly, posterior margin almost straight; in lateral view petiole distinctly marginate laterally; sides of petiole and postpetiole with very sparse hairs. But in + +S. oculata + +, anterior margin of clypeus weakly convex; metanotal groove weakly impressed and visible; in dorsal view petiole distinctly widening posteriorly, posterior margin obviously concave; in lateral view petiole not marginate laterally; sides of petiole and postpetiole with rich hairs. + + + + +The new species is also allied to + +S. chapmani +Taylor, +1966 + +, but differs from the latter by posterior margin of head distinctly and widely concave in full-face view, head nearly rectangle, dorsolateral borders of pronotum and mesonotum approximately right-angled, marginated laterally. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/08/C3/3708C3281E0952A89789F496D9C87659.xml b/data/37/08/C3/3708C3281E0952A89789F496D9C87659.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5859ff14ae0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/08/C3/3708C3281E0952A89789F496D9C87659.xml @@ -0,0 +1,396 @@ + + + +Contribution to the knowledge of Limoniidae (Diptera: Tipuloidea): first records of 244 species from various European countries + + + +Author + +Kolcsar, Levente-Peter +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7784-2386 +Center for Marine Environmental Studies, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan +kolcsar.peter@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Oosterbroek, Pjotr +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Gavryushin, Dmitry I. +Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University, Moscow, Russia + + + +Author + +Olsen, Kjell Magne +BioFokus, Oslo, Norway + + + +Author + +Paramonov, Nikolai M. +Zoological Institute RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia + + + +Author + +Pilipenko, Valentin E. +Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia + + + +Author + +Stary, Jaroslav +Silesian Museum, Opava, Czech Republic + + + +Author + +Polevoi, Alexei +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2932-9574 +Forest Research Institute KarRC RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia + + + +Author + +Lantsov, Vladimir I. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8275-496X +Tembotov Institute of Ecology of Mountain Territories of Russian Academy of Sciences, Nalchik, Russia + + + +Author + +Eiroa, Eulalia +Departamento de Zoologia, Genetica y Antropologia Fisica, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain + + + +Author + +Andersson, Michael +Gripenbergsgatan 64, Huskvarna, Sweden + + + +Author + +Salmela, Jukka +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9462-9624 +Regional Museum of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland + + + +Author + +Quindroit, Clovis +GRETIA, Angers, France + + + +Author + +d'Oliveira, Micha C. +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Hancock, E. Geoffrey +The Hunterian Museum, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom + + + +Author + +Mederos, Jorge +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2356-3642 +Museu de Ciencies Naturals de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain + + + +Author + +Boardman, Pete +Natural England, Telford, United Kingdom + + + +Author + +Viitanen, Esko +Vanhan-Mankkaan tie 29, Espoo, Finland + + + +Author + +Watanabe, Kozo +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7062-595X +Center for Marine Environmental Studies, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2021 + +2021-07-21 + + +9 + + +67085 +67085 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e67085 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e67085 +1314-2828-9-e67085 +098BBB1FA97956E582A44AEE6C55905D + + + + +Dicranomyia (Idiopyga) alpina Bangerter, 1948 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: + +Other material +. + +Occurrence +: + +occurrenceRemarks: +2 males +, +1 female +; recordedBy: + + +L.-P. +Kolcsar + +| + +E. +Toeroek + + +; individualCount: +3 +; sex: +male, female +; preparations: +Ethanol +; occurrenceID: EU_LIM_189; + +Taxon +: + +scientificName: +Dicranomyia +(Idiopyga) alpina +Bangerter +, 1948; family: +Limoniidae +; genus: +Dicranomyia +; subgenus: +Idiopyga +; specificEpithet: alpina; scientificNameAuthorship: +Bangerter +, 1948; + +Location +: + +country: +Romania +; stateProvince: +Harghita +; municipality: +Toplița +; locality: + +Călimani +Mts., +Lomaș +Valley + +; verbatimElevation: + + +1210 m + + +; minimumElevationInMeters: 1210; decimalLatitude: +47.06016 +; decimalLongitude: +25.29841 +; + +Identification +: + +identifiedBy: + + +L.-P. +Kolcsar + + +; + +Event +: + +samplingProtocol: +Sweep net +; eventDate: +2011-09-05 +; verbatimEventDate: +5/Sep/2011 +; +Record Level: +institutionCode: CKLP; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + +Type status: + +Other material +. + +Occurrence +: + +occurrenceRemarks: +1 male +, +1 female +; recordedBy: + + +L.-P. +Kolcsar + +| + +E. +Toeroek + + +; individualCount: +2 +; sex: +male, female +; preparations: +Ethanol +; occurrenceID: EU_LIM_190; + +Taxon +: + +scientificName: +Dicranomyia +(Idiopyga) alpina +Bangerter +, 1948; family: +Limoniidae +; genus: +Dicranomyia +; subgenus: +Idiopyga +; specificEpithet: alpina; scientificNameAuthorship: +Bangerter +, 1948; + +Location +: + +country: +Romania +; stateProvince: +Harghita +; municipality: +Toplița +; locality: + +Călimani +Mts., +Iezer Lake + +; verbatimElevation: + + +1740 m + + +; minimumElevationInMeters: 1740; decimalLatitude: +47.09359 +; decimalLongitude: +25.26134 +; + +Identification +: + +identifiedBy: + + +L.-P. +Kolcsar + + +; + +Event +: + +samplingProtocol: +Sweep net +; eventDate: +2011-09-05 +; verbatimEventDate: +5/Sep/2011 +; +Record Level: +institutionCode: CKLP; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + + + + +Distribution +First records from Romania. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/00/3709007687185514851A38AAB0FF7971.xml b/data/37/09/00/3709007687185514851A38AAB0FF7971.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1715b5634c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/00/3709007687185514851A38AAB0FF7971.xml @@ -0,0 +1,327 @@ + + + +A glimpse in the dark? A first phylogenetic approach in a widespread freshwater snail from tropical Asia and northern Australia (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae) + + + +Author + +Boonmekam, Dusit + + + +Author + +Krailas, Duangduen + + + +Author + +Gimnich, France + + + +Author + +Neiber, Marco T. + + + +Author + +Glaubrecht, Matthias + +text + + +Zoosystematics and Evolution + + +2019 + +95 + + +2 + + +373 +390 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34486 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34486 +1860-0743-2-373 +BC529DE5DF5341EFA803383E08E04721 + + + + + +Thiara +Roeding +, 1798 + +* + + + + +Vesica +Humphrey, 1797: 58 [unavailable, published in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes, see +International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1912 +: 116-117; among the mentioned species is +Vesica thiara +Humphrey, 1797 (unavailable) = +Helix amarula +Linnaeus, 1758]. + + +Thiara +Roeding +, 1798: 109 [type species: +Helix amarula +Linnaeus, 1758, by subsequent designation of Herrmannsen 1849 in +Herrmannsen 1847-1849 +: 576]. + + +Melania +Lamarck, 1799: 75 [type species: +Helix amarula +Linnaeus, 1758, by monotypy]. + + +Melanigenus +Renier, 1807: pl. 8 [unavailable, published in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes, see +International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1956 +: 290]. + + +Melas +Montfort, 1810: 322-324 [unjustified emendation of +Melania +Lamarck, 1799]. + + +Melanidia +Rafinesque, 1815: 144 [unjustified emendation of +Melania +Lamarck, 1799]. + + +Melanea +- Sowerby 1818 in +Sowerby 1818-1822 +: 33 [incorrect subsequent spelling of +Melania +Lamarck, 1799]. + + +? +Spirilla +Gray, 1824: 254 [unavailable, published in synonymy; mentioned as +Spirilla spinosa +(quoting a label or note attributed to G. Humphrey as " +Spirilla spinosa +, freshwater spiral spined shell, from Admirality Island, New Guinea") under +Melania setosa +Swainson, 1824 (= +Thiara cancellata +Roeding +, 1798, see +Swainson 1824 +: 13-15 and +Wilkins 1957 +: 167-169) and as being conspecific with the nomenclaturally unavailable +Buccinum aculeatum +Lister, 1692: pl. 1055, fig. 8. Mentioned as a synonym by + +Ferussac +1824 + +: 318, +Gray 1825 +: 524, +Oken 1833 +: 133, +Gray 1847 +: 152, +Wilkins 1957 +: 167 as well as by +Agassiz 1842 +: 84, +Agassiz 1847 +: 348 and Herrmannsen 1848 in +Herrmannsen 1847-1849 +: 491 in nomenclators, with the name attributed to +Humphrey 1797 +(where it could not be found). Used by +Favre 1869 +: 79 (attributing the name to G. Humphrey but without reference to the work of +Gray 1824 +) for a subgenus of +Fusus +Bruguiere +1789 in + +Bruguiere +1789-1792 + +and in a very different meaning from that of +Gray 1824 +and therefore not regarded here as having been made available from that work]. + + +Spirella +- +Oken 1833 +: 61 [incorrect subsequent spelling of the unavailable +Spirilla +Gray, 1824]. + + +Melacantha +Swainson, 1840: 341 [type species: +Helix amarula +Linnaeus, 1758 by subsequent designation of Herrmannsen 1849 in +Herrmannsen 1847-1849 +: 26]. + + +Thaira +- +Gray 1840 +: 148 [incorrect subsequent spelling of +Thiara +Roeding +, 1798]. + + +Amarula +Sowerby, 1842: 61 [type species: +Helix amarula +Linnaeus, 1758, by monotypy]. + + +Melanium +- Busch 1842 in Philippi 1842-1845: 4 [incorrect subsequent spelling of +Melania +Lamarck, 1799]. + + +Tiara +- +Gray 1847 +: 152 [incorrect subsequent spelling of +Thiara +Roeding +, 1798]. + + +Thaera +- +Agassiz 1847 +: 367 [unavailable, emendation for +Thaira +as used by +Gray 1840 +: 148 proposed in synonymy in a nomenclator]. + + +Lithoparches +Gistel, 1848: ix [nom. nov. pro +Melania +Lamarck, 1799; type species: +Helix amarula +Linnaeus, 1758, by typification of the replaced name]. + + +Hydrognoma +Gistel, 1848: 169 [nom. nov. pro +Melania +Lamarck, 1799, type species: +Helix amarula +Linnaeus, 1758, by typefication of the replaced name]. + + +Tiaropsis +Brot, 1871: 298 [non +Agassiz 1849 +: 289-298; type species: +Melania winteri +Busch, 1842 in +Philippi 1842-1844 +: +Melania +, 1, pl. 1 figs 1, 2 by subsequent designation of Brot 1874 in +Brot 1874-1879 +: 7]. + + +Cerithomelania +Moore, 1899: 233-234 [type species: +Helix amarula +Linnaeus, 1758 by original designation]. + + +? +Ripalania +Iredale, 1943: 209 [type species: +Melania queenslandica +Smith, 1882 by monotypy]. + + +? +Setaeara +Morrison, 1952: 8 [type species: +Thiara cancellata +Roeding +, 1798 by original designation]. + + + +Remarks. + +Many names have been proposed for the group of +Thiaridae +that is currently regarded as representing + +Thiara + +Roeding +, 1798. Several of these names are objective junior synonyms of + +Thiara + +having the same type species ( + +Helix amarula + +Linnaeus, 1758), and several others are nomenclaturally unavailable. A few, like + +Ripalania + +Iredale, 1943 or + +Setaeara + +Morrison, 1952, may actually be synonyms of + +Thiara + +. However, those hypotheses should be further tested using molecular genetic approaches. Therefore, these nominal genera were only tentatively included in the synonymy of + +Thiara + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/01/370901CF68BCE2AEF51169D2F44FF20D.xml b/data/37/09/01/370901CF68BCE2AEF51169D2F44FF20D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..20bbd3e9b9c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/01/370901CF68BCE2AEF51169D2F44FF20D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part F) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +516 +528 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Ficus benghalensis +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 1059. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in India." RCN: 7721. + + + +Lectotype +(Wijnands, +Bot. Commelins +: 153. 1983): [icon] + +" +Ficus Bengalensis +, folio subrotundo, fructu orbiculato" + +in Commelin, Hort. Med. Amstelod. Pl. Rar. 1: 119, t. 62. 1697. + + + + +Current name: + + +Ficus benghalensis + +L. + +( +Moraceae +). + + + + +Note: +See discussion by Corner (in +Gard. Bull. Straits Settlem. +17: 382. 1960), who interpreted the name via the Rheede element though without formally typifying +Linnaeus' +name, although Smith ( +Fl. Vitiensis Nova +2: 175. 1981) believed Corner had done so. Wijnands therefore appears to have made the earliest explicit type choice. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/3F/37093FA9C786BCA35614E0F72741C273.xml b/data/37/09/3F/37093FA9C786BCA35614E0F72741C273.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6a9b2e4c7c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/3F/37093FA9C786BCA35614E0F72741C273.xml @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ + + + +Additions to the xiphydriid woodwasp (Hymenoptera, Xiphydriidae) fauna of New Caledonia + + + +Author + +Smith, David R. +Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, c / o National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P. O. Box 37012, MRC 168, Washington, DC. 20013 - 7012, USA +sawfly2@aol.com + + + +Author + +Villemant, Claire +Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Departement Origines et Evolution, UMR 7205 ISYEB, CP 50, 45 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2017 + +2017-12-20 + + +61 + + +65 +74 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.61.21787 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.61.21787 +1314-2607-61-65 +268B0BA8DE7D4199872F4DF5ECCE290A +DF6DEC66FB20FF95174D090B23508E33 +1139014 + + + + + + +Calexiphyda +caledonia Smith + +Figs 13-17 + + + + +Calexiphyda caledonia +Smith 2008 +: 33. + + + +Diagnosis. + +Female: Length, 21 mm. Black with mid and hind tibiae and tarsi and sheath orange, white spots laterally on first tergite (Fig. +13 +). Frons finely punctate to rugose; short, indistinct longitudinal carinae between antennae (Fig. +16 +, +17 +). Anteromedian part of mesonotum, inner half of mesonotal lateral lobes, and axillae with longitudinal or diagonal carinae, those on anteromedian part of mesonotum nearly entire length (Fig. +15 +). + + + +Figures 13-17. + +Calexiphyda caledonia + +. +13 +Lateral +14 +Head and thorax lateral +15 +Thorax dorsal +16 +Head front +17 +Head dorsal. + + +Male: Unknown. + + +Specimen examined. + +Female, "Nouvelle +Caledonie +, Province Sud, Thio, Comboui, 1040 m ( +21.77805S +, +166.29472E +), NC-COM-YPT8 17-19.XI.2016, yellow pan trap, C. Villemant rec." + + + +Remarks. + +This species is recognized by its black color with the contrastingly orange tibiae, tarsi, and sheath (Fig. +13 +), and the distinct longitudinal carinae on the mesonotum (Fig. +15 +). This specimen represents a new record for the species. It was previously recorded from +Riviere +Bleue Province Park and Mt. Khogis, in Province Sud, 17 km NNE +Noumea +( +Smith 2008 +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F860FFA2FD9D386AFAAEFEB9.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F860FFA2FD9D386AFAAEFEB9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c9ce3811681 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F860FFA2FD9D386AFAAEFEB9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Nilobezzia nilotica +( +Kieffer, 1925 +) + + + + + + + + + +Parrotia nilotica +Kieffer, 1925: 263 + + +( +♂ +, +Egypt +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Black species. Legs brown, tarsi whitish, distal tarsomeres black, femora unarmed. + + + + +Distribution + + + +Egypt +. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +The genus + +Parrotia +Kieffer, 1923 + +was placed as subgenus within + +Nilobezzia + +by +Lane (1958: 25) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F860FFADFD8A3F12FE8DFCD5.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F860FFADFD8A3F12FE8DFCD5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d5fec8e3d79 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F860FFADFD8A3F12FE8DFCD5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Macropeza nuda +( +Becker, 1903 +) + + + + + + + + + +Macroptilum nudum +Becker, 1903: 77 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, description, +Egypt +). + + + + + +Macropeza nuda + +– + +Wirth & Ratanaworabhan 1972: 216 + +(combination). — + +Szadziewski 1986: 85 + +( +♀ +, redescription, +Egypt +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Blackish +- +brown midges. Scutellum with 2 lateral, 2 submedian setae. Wing with brownish radial cell. Legs brown, except tarsomeres 1–2 of fore and mid legs and tarsomeres 1–4 of hind leg paler; hind tibial comb with 7 spines; tarsomeres 1 of all legs with 2 pairs of spines; female claws stout, nearly equal, with short basal outer teeth, male claws simple. Female with 2 elongate seminal capsules with very short necks ( +Szadziewski 1986 +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Egypt +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F860FFADFDB33D46FBB2F9A1.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F860FFADFDB33D46FBB2F9A1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b52070a3aa4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F860FFADFDB33D46FBB2F9A1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Genus + +Nilobezzia +Kieffer, 1921 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + + + + + +Nilobezzia armata +Kieffer, 1921 + +; by original designation. + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Large robust midges. Wing often whitish at base, with distal or marginal infuscation; 1 or 2 radial cells; costa moderately short (female costal ratio about 0.80). Legs slender; femora slender to moderately swollen distally, females with short ventral spines, males with long, slender setae; hind tibia with long spine-like setae; female tarsomeres 5 with numerous ventral batonnets; female claws large, equal and bent at base, nearly straight distally, with short basal outer teeth. Male genitalia rotated and bent ventrally so that sternal surface is oriented caudally; gonocoxite and gonostylus poorly developed, usually fused, gonostylus short, thumb +- +like, immovable; aedeagus with short basal arch and cap +- +like tip; parameres with bulbous fused basal portion, distal halves elongate, tightly adpressed, tips slightly bulbous (de +Meillon & Wirth 1991 +). Female abdomen with 2 small, slender sclerites and pair of setal tufts on sternite VIII; 2 seminal capsules. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +We are unable to distinguish + +Nilobezzia nilotica + +from + +N. nigritibialis + +and were not able to borrow the +holotypes +of either species or have access to them. Moreover, the original description of + +N. nilotica + +, by +Kieffer (1925) +, is very poor and not helpful in distinguishing either species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F861FFACFD8A3813FAE8F859.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F861FFACFD8A3813FAE8F859.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..37c9d4da75a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F861FFACFD8A3813FAE8F859.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Genus + +Macropeza +Meigen, 1818 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + + + + + +Macropeza albitarsis +Meigen, 1818 + +; by original designation. + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Large midges. Wings narrow, with 1 radial cell; female costa extends to wing tip, male radial cell shorter. Legs slender; femora unarmed; tarsomeres 5 of female with several pairs of batonnets; female claws short, curved, equal on all legs, with a short basal outer tooth. Male genitalia elongate, slender; gonocoxite elongate, gonostylus short; aedeagus short to elongate with rounded to truncate apex; parameres separate, each with heavily sclerotized, ventrally recurved, hook-like process (de +Meillon & Wirth 1991 +). Female abdomen with pair of lateral setal tufts on sternite VIII; 2 large seminal capsules. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F861FFACFDD53D76FE8DFA0E.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F861FFACFDD53D76FE8DFA0E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..309655cc7fe --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F861FFACFDD53D76FE8DFA0E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Johannsenomyia imparunguis +( +Becker, 1903 +) + + + + + + + + + +Ceratopogon imparunguis +Becker, 1903: 72 + + +( +♀ +, description, +Egypt +). + + + + + +Ceratolophus imparunguis + +– + +Kieffer 1906: 60 + +(combination). + + + + + +Palpomyia imparunguis + +– + +Kieffer 1917: 364 + +(combination). + + + + + +Allohelea imparunguis + +– + +Kieffer 1925: 263 + +(combination). + + + + + +Johannsenomyia imparunguis + +– + +Szadziewski 1984: 189 + +(combination, +♀ +, redescription). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Scutellum and scutum blackish +- +brown. Wings pale; second radial cell 4 times as long as first. Halteres with proximal half yellow, distal half blackish +- +brown. Legs slender, unarmed; female with 2 equal fore claws, claws with 1 large inner basal tooth, mid and hind legs with single long claw and 3 basal teeth as in fore claws; fore and hind tarsomeres 5 with 5 pairs of batonnets. Females with 2 large, oval seminal capsules with short necks and a distinct seminal duct ( +Szadziewski 1984 +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Egypt +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F861FFACFDE33F62FB7DFCA5.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F861FFACFDE33F62FB7DFCA5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ff764d61297 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F861FFACFDE33F62FB7DFCA5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Genus + +Johannsenomyia +Malloch, 1915 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + + + + + +Johannsenomyia halteralis +Malloch, 1915 + +; by original designation. + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Slender midges. Legs long, slender, apices of femora clubbed, especially on fore femur; femora usually without ventral spines; tarsomeres 5 of females with numerous pairs of batonnets, males with 2–3 pairs of batonnets; female claws unequal on mid and hind legs, longer claw slightly curved, each claw with short, stout basal inner tooth. Wings with 2 radial cells (rarely 1); costa moderately long (female costal ratio about 0.80). Male tergite IX rounded distally; aedeagus broad, with cap-like tip; parameres separate, basal portion curved, apical portion broad, flattened (de +Meillon & Wirth 1991 +). Female abdomen petiolate, narrow at base, sternite VIII without setal tufts; 2 large seminal capsules. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F862FFACFE3A3804FEF7FEB9.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F862FFACFE3A3804FEF7FEB9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0fd71f2f517 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F862FFACFE3A3804FEF7FEB9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Homohelea telmatoscopa +( +Ingram & Macfie, 1921 +) + + + + + + + + + +Schizodactylus telmatoscopus +Ingram & Macfie, 1921: 353 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, description, figures, +Ghana +). + + + + + +Homohelea telmatoscopa + +– de + +Meillon & Wirth 1981: 542 + +(key to sub-Saharan species of + +Homohelea + +); + +Boorman & van Harten 2002: 455 + +( +♀ +, +Yemen +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Thorax uniformly dark brown; small prothoracic lobes present. Flagellum dark brown. Palpus very small; third segment not swollen, sensory pit rudimentary. Femora with 10–12 ventral spines; femora and tibiae dark brown, tarsomeres 1–4 paler; tarsomeres 5 dark brown, with 2 pairs of dark batonnets; female claws long and equal, fore claws with a large basal inner tooth. Female with 2 ovoid seminal capsules with short necks ( +Ingram & Macfie 1921 +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Ghana +, +Yemen +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F862FFAFFD8A3A55FE65FA1B.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F862FFAFFD8A3A55FE65FA1B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6bf109d5d9e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F862FFAFFD8A3A55FE65FA1B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Genus + +Homohelea +Kieffer, 1917 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + + + + + +Palpomyia abjuncta +Kieffer, 1913 + +; by original designation. + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Large, grayish, stout-bodied midges. Legs stout; femora with 4–8 stout, black ventral spines; fifth tarsomeres of female with 2 pairs of batonnets; female claws long, equal, curved, on fore leg with basal inner teeth. Wings with 2 radial cells and long costa that extends to near wing tip. Male genitalia short, stout; gonostylus stout, with slender hooked tip; aedeagus with high basal arch and stout tip; parameres fused except basally (de +Meillon & Wirth 1991 +). Female abdomen without ventral setal tufts on sternite VIII; 2 seminal capsules. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F862FFAFFD963FF9FAF1FBC8.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F862FFAFFD963FF9FAF1FBC8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..70e705f99f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F862FFAFFD963FF9FAF1FBC8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Tribe + +Sphaeromiini +Newman, 1834 + + + + + + + + +Key to genera of Middle East +Sphaeromiini + + + + + + + + +1. Tibiae with stout bristles..................................................................................................................2 + + +– Tibiae without stout bristles.............................................................................................................3 + + + + + +2. Parameres fused, H-shaped; female claws with short basal external tooth ........................................ ....................................................................................................................... + +Nilobezzia +Kieffer, 1921 + + + + + +– Parameres fused, Y-shaped; female claws with short basal inner tooth ............................................. .................................................................................................................... + +Sphaeromias +Curtis, 1829 + + + + + + + +3. Wing with one radial cell ........................................................................... + +Macropeza +Meigen, 1818 + + + + +– Wing with two radial cells.................................................................................................................4 + + + + + +4. Parameres separate; female claws equal on fore leg, unequal on mid and hind legs .......................... .......................................................................................................... + +Johannsenomyia +Malloch, 1915 + + + + + +– Parameres fused; female claws equal on all legs ....................................... + +Homohelea +Kieffer, 1917 + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F863FFAEFD9D3FC6FCA9FB19.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F863FFAEFD9D3FC6FCA9FB19.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d741b4c120f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F863FFAEFD9D3FC6FCA9FB19.xml @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Palpomyia tibialis +( +Meigen, 1818 +) + + + + + + + + + +Ceratopogon tibialis +Meigen, 1818: 82 + + +( +♀ +, Europe). + + + + + + +Palpomyia atripectus +Kieffer, 1919: 101 + + +( +♀ +, +Hungary +, +Serbia +). + + + + + + +Palpomyia laticollis +Goetghebuer, 1922: 55 + + +( +♂ +, +Belgium +). + + + + + + +Palpomyia nipponica +Tokunaga, 1939: 297 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, +Japan +). + + + + + +Palpomyia tibialis + +– + +Kieffer 1901: 156 + +(combination, in key). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Dark brown species. Fore and mid legs pale brown to yellow; coxae brown; hind femur dark brown on distal ¼ ( +♀ +) or ½ ( +♂ +), hind tibia dark. Fore femur with 6–9, mid femur with 0–2 and hind femur with 1–3 ventral spines; fifth tarsomere of hind leg with 2 rows of large setae. Male gonocoxite long, basally expanded, with small ventral bulge on distal portion covered with small setae; gonostylus triangular, with short, stout setae on ventral surface; parameres fused only on extreme basal portion, apices elongate, slender, pointed, recurved. Female with 2 ovoid seminal capsules with distinct necks. + + + + + +Distribution + + + +North America ( +Grogan & Wirth 1979 +; +Borkent & Grogan 2009 +), +Azerbaijan +, N +China +, Europe ( +Austria +, +Belarus +, +Belgium +, +Czech Republic +, +Denmark +, +Estonia +, +Finland +, +France +, +Germany +, +Hungary +, +Netherlands +, +Norway +, +Poland +, +Romania +, N and NW +Russia +, +Serbia +, +Slovakia +, +Sweden +, +Ukraine +and former +Yugoslavia +), +Georgia +, +Japan +and +Tajikistan +. From the Middle East known from +Turkey +( +Remm 1988 +; + +Szadziewski +et al. +2013 + +; +Turgut & Kilic 2015 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F863FFAEFDFC3B02FD68F99A.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F863FFAEFDFC3B02FD68F99A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..17f96ea1f74 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F863FFAEFDFC3B02FD68F99A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Genus + +Phaenobezzia +Haeselbarth, 1965 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + + + + + +Probezzia pistiae +Ingram & Macfie, 1921 + +; by original designation. + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Large, slender, nearly bare midges. Legs slender; femora unarmed; female fifth tarsomeres with long, stout, sharp setae with bent tips. Female claws equal, evenly curved or bent at base, each with small basal inner tooth. Wing with 1 radial cell; costa extending 0.80–0.90 of wing length. Gonostylus very small, rarely absent (de +Meillon & Wirth 1991 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F863FFAFFD903887FE06FE54.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F863FFAFFD903887FE06FE54.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8b9e9fd7be5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F863FFAFFD903887FE06FE54.xml @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Phaenobezzia spekei +( +Macfie, 1939 +) + + + + + + + + + +Nilobezzia spekei +Macfie, 1939: 101 + + +( +♀ +, description, +Uganda +). + + + + + +Phaenobezzia spekei + +– + +Boorman & van Harten 2002: 459 + +( +♀ +and +♂ +recorded, diagnosis of +♀ +, +Yemen +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Scutum dark brown, scutellum paler, with 8 bristles. Fore leg yellow; tibia darker towards tip; tarsomeres 3–5 dark; mid leg similarly colored but tarsus darker; hind leg with yellow femur, dark tibia and tarsus with bristles. Female fifth tarsomeres with 3–4 pairs of sharp, black, spine-like setae with bent tips; 2 + +large seminal capsules with long necks ( +Boorman & van Harten 2002 +). +Boorman & van Harten (2002) +reported males from +Yemen +, but they were not diagnosed or illustrated. + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Uganda +, +Yemen +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F864FFA9FE2E3DB2FE8AFABD.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F864FFA9FE2E3DB2FE8AFABD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d42349833f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F864FFA9FE2E3DB2FE8AFABD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Palpomyia nakali +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + + + + + + + + + +Palpomyia nakali +Boorman & van Harten, 2002: 459 + + +( +♂ +, figure, description, +Oman +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Scutum and abdomen pale orange-brown. Legs pale, non-banded, without obvious darker bands; fore femur with 3 spines. Male genitalia with gonocoxite and gonostylus long, slender; parameres fused, with slender apical portion; aedeagus broadly triangular, probably with apical cap ( +Boorman & van Harten 2002 +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Oman +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F864FFAEFDFC3B6EFCDEFE9A.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F864FFAEFDFC3B6EFCDEFE9A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..01e75aedc68 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F864FFAEFDFC3B6EFCDEFE9A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Palpomyia schmidti +Goetghebuer, 1934 + + + + + + + + + +Palpomyia schmidti +Goetghebuer, 1934: 36 + + +( +♀ +, +Iraq +, +Iran +). + + + + + + +Palpomyia miki +Goetghebuer, 1934: 91 + + +( +♀ +, +Hungary +). + + + + + +Palpomyia miki + +– + +Remm 1976: 175 + +( +♀ +, +♂ +, +Russia +). + + + + + +Palpomyia schmidti + +– + + +Szadziewski +et al. +2009: 195 + + +( +♀ +, +♂ +, +Iraq +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Body pale brown. Legs yellowish; fore femur with 5–8 spines, mid and hind femora with 1–3 spines; mid and hind tibiae with numerous large setae; tarsomere 1 of mid leg with medial spines. Male gonocoxite with long ventral apodeme; gonostylus evenly bent, with pointed apex; parameres separate with swollen apices; aedeagus broadly triangular. Female with simple claws; with 2 ovoid seminal capsules with short necks ( + +Szadziewski +et al. +2009 + +). + + + + + +Material examined + + + +TURKEY +: +1 ♀ +, Aydiklar, +21 Jul. 2004 +, R. Dobosz leg. ( +CEIUG +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Azerbaijan, Europe ( +Hungary +, +Spain +, +Slovakia +, +Ukraine +), +Iran +, +Iraq +, +Kazakhstan +, +Mongolia +, +Russia +(S Siberia), +Tajikistan +, +Turkey +( + +Szadziewski +et al. +2009 + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F866FFA9FE723F12FE20FC6E.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F866FFA9FE723F12FE20FC6E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d7b45d03235 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F866FFA9FE723F12FE20FC6E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,298 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Palpomyia freidbergi +Alwin-Kownacka & Szadziewski + +sp. nov. + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +740DBF40-E804-477B-A437-E73110DF1287 + + + + + +Fig. 4 + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +This new species is distinguished by the following combination of characters: males with 4–5 fore femoral ventral spines; very short sternite IX; parameres fused, curved ventrally, apex pointed; and aedeagus with very high basal arch and plate-like apex. Females with 6–9 fore femoral spines; claws without basal inner teeth; and 2 large seminal capsules. + + + + +Etymology + + + +The species is named for Amnon Freidberg, Department of Zoology, +Tel Aviv +University, +Israel +, who kindly sent us biting midges from +Israel +. + + + + + +Material examined + + + + + +Holotype + + + +ISRAEL +: +♂ +, Enot Zukim, + +11 Oct. 1994 + +, +A. Freidberg +and +F. Kaplan +leg. ( +TAU +). + + + + +Paratypes + + + +ISRAEL +: +4 ♀♀ +, same collection data as +holotype +except +22 Apr. 1998 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +); +1 ♀ +, En Feshkha, +11 Aug. 1986 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +); +9 ♀♀ +, Roch Zukim, +10 Apr. 1994 +, A. Freidberg and F. Kaplan leg. ( +TAU +). + + + + + +Description + + + +Male + + +HEAD. Uniformly brown. Antenna pale brown, with sparse plume; flagellomeres 9–13 slightly darker than 1–8; flagellomeres 10–13 elongate; total flagellum length of 1.00 mm; antennal ratio 1.40. Palpus ( +Fig. 4C +) yellowish, slender; third segment cylindrical, with several distinct capitate sensilla; palpal ratio 3.00. + + +THORAX ( +Fig. 4B +). Brown with scutum, scutellum, katepisternum and mediotergite slightly darker; scutum, scutellum, anteroanepisternum with fine setae, katepisternum and mediotergite bare; 1 row of 3 bristles posterior to sutura transveralis; 1 bristle on scutum just anterior of scutellum; scutellum with 4 marginal bristles. Wing ( +Fig. 4A +) with distinct veins; first radial cell about 2 × shorter than second; wing length +1.34 mm +; costal ratio 0.70. Legs ( +Fig. 4B +) slender; fore coxa yellow, mid and hind coxae brownish; fore and mid femora yellow, hind femur yellow with dark brown apex; fore femur with 4–5 stout, black ventral spines; fore and mid tibiae yellow, slightly smoky on proximal portions; hind tibia uniformly dark brown; tarsi yellow, tarsomeres 4–5 slightly darker than 1–3; tarsal ratio of fore leg 1.90, of mid leg 3.30, of hind leg 2.40. + + +ABDOMEN ( +Fig. 4B +). Pale brown. + + +GENITALIA ( +Fig. 4 +E–G). Sternite IX ( +Fig. 4G +) narrow. Gonocoxite slender, elongate; gonostylus swollen on basal portion, distal half slender, greatly curved, with blunt apex. Parameres ( +Fig. 4F +) fused, base W-shaped, expanded on mid portion, apex pointed, bent ventrally. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 4G +) triangular; basal arch very high; membrane with numerous fine microtrichia; apex plate-like. + + +Female + + +Similar to male with the usual sexual differences. Antenna uniformly pale brown; total flagellum length of +1.40–1.60 mm +; antennal ratio 1.40–1.60. Palpal ratio 4.50. Mandible with 6–7 large teeth. + + + +Fig. 4. + +Palpomyia freidbergi +Szadziewski & Alwin + +sp. nov. +A +. Wing, ♀. +B +. Thorax, ♂. +C +. Palpus, ♀. +D +. Fore femur, ♀. +E +. Genitalia, ♂. +F +. Parameres. +G +. Aedeagus and sternite IX. +H +. Seminal capsules. + + + +THORAX. Coloration and arrangement of bristles as in male. Wing as in male but larger with longer costa ( +Fig. 4A +); wing length +2.10–2.20 mm +; costal ratio 0.80. Coloration of legs as in male; fore femur armed with 6–9 stout, black ventral spines ( +Fig. 4D +); tarsal ratio of fore leg 2.10–2.40, of mid leg 3.80–4.50, of hind leg 2.30–2.50. + + +ABDOMEN. Pale brown, with 2 pairs of internal tergal apodemes. Two large, subequal, ovoid seminal capsules ( +Fig. 4H +) with short necks, measuring 0.08–0.10 × +0.12–0.14 mm +and 0.06–0.08 × +0.10–0.12 mm +. + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Israel +; known only from the +type +locality. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +Males of this new species have an aedeagus with an unusual plate-like apex that is similar to that of males of + +P +. +mahyoubi + +from +Yemen +. This newly described species differs mostly in having pale legs with a dark brown hind tibia, only the fore femur armed with ventral spines and a distinctly curved gonostylus. Males of + +P +. +mahyoubi + +have a nearly straight gonostylus, dark brown legs, and all femora have ventral spines. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F867FFAAFD9A3DC9FC3CF878.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F867FFAAFD9A3DC9FC3CF878.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..547f6e2a8ea --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F867FFAAFD9A3DC9FC3CF878.xml @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Palpomyia flavipes +( +Meigen, 1804 +) + + + + + + + + + +Ceratopogon flavipes +Meigen, 1804: 28 + + +( +♂ +, locality not given). + + + + + + +Ceratopogon hortulanus +Meigen, 1818: 81 + + +( +♀ +, Europe). + + + + + +Ceratopogon flavipes + +– + +Walker 1856: 228 + +( +♀ +, +Great Britain +; = + +C. hortulanus + +). + + + + + +Palpomyia flavipes + +– + +Kieffer 1901: 157 + +( +♂ +, combination). — + +Krzywiński 1995: 75 + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, distribution). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Body with flattened setae with thin, whip-like tips; thorax uniformly dark. Legs yellow; femora as well as fore and mid tibiae with apical brown bands; hind tibia brown; fore femur with 5–8 spines. Male genitalia with relatively short gonocoxite; gonostylus almost straight, as long as gonocoxite; parameres fused, slender, expanded apically; aedeagus triangular with low basal arch and evenly rounded apex. Females with 2 large oval seminal capsules with short necks. + + + + +Material examined + + + +ISRAEL +: +1 ♀ +, Dan, +21 Jul. 1983 +, I. Nussbaum leg. ( +TAU +); +1 ♀ +, same collection data except +28 Sep. 1983 +( +TAU +); +1 ♀ +, Park Hayarden, +7 May 1987 +, I. Yarom leg. ( +TAU +); +2 ♀♀ +, same collection data except +7 May 1987 +, F. Kaplan leg. ( +TAU +); +1 ♀ +, same collection data except +14 Apr. 1999 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +); +1 ♂ +, Lifta, +10 May 1987 +, I. Nussbaum leg. ( +TAU +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Armenia +, Europe ( +Andorra +, +Austria +, +Belarus +, +Belgium +, +Czech Republic +, +Denmark +, +Estonia +, +Finland +, +France +, +Germany +, +Great Britain +, +Hungary +, +Ireland +, +Italy +, +Latvia +, +Lithuania +, +Norway +, +Poland +, N and NW +Russia +, +Slovakia +, +Ukraine +), Georgia, +Kazakhstan +and +Turkey +( +Remm 1988 +; + +Szadziewski +et al. +2013 + +; +Turgut & Kilic 2015 +). The above records are the first from +Israel +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F86FFFA2FD863DD2FE0DFA75.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F86FFFA2FD863DD2FE0DFA75.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f6aa8965a33 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F86FFFA2FD863DD2FE0DFA75.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Genus + +Sphaeromias +Curtis, 1829 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + + + + + +Sphaeromias albomarginatus +Curtis, 1829 + +; by original designation. + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Large, grayish pollinose midges. Legs slender; femora with numerous spines; hind tibia with long dorsal spine-like setae; female tarsomeres 5 with numerous slender batonnets; female claws large, curved, equal, with long, slender, sharp basal inner teeth. Wings with 2 radial cells; female costa long, extending nearly to wing tip. Male gonocoxite and gonostylus elongate; aedeagus with broad, cap-like apex; parameres fused, Y-shaped, distal portion becoming increasingly broader distally, apex rounded, setose (de +Meillon & Wirth 1991 +). Female abdomen without pair of sclerites or setal tufts on sternite VIII; 2 seminal capsules. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F86FFFA2FE2A3F63FC80FC49.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F86FFFA2FE2A3F63FC80FC49.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3fcad830edc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F86FFFA2FE2A3F63FC80FC49.xml @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Nilobezzia nigritibialis +( +Ingram & Macfie, 1921 +) + + + + + + + + + +Dicrobezzia nigritibialis +Ingram & Macfie, 1921: 371 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, descriptions, figures, +Ghana +). + + + + + +Nilobezzia nigritibialis + +– + +Clastrier & Wirth 1961: 212 + +(combination). — + +Boorman & Harten 2002: 455 + +( +♀ +, description, +Oman +, +Yemen +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Very dark brown midges. Legs with femora and tibiae dark brown; tarsomeres 1–4 pale brown, tarsomeres 5 dark brown; female claws large, equal, with basal outer teeth; female tarsomeres 5 armed with 8–10 black slender batonnets. Male with moderately well developed gonocoxite, broad basally, gonostylus conical and reduced; aedeagus with high basal arch and broad, cap-like apex ( +Boorman & Harten 2002 +). Female with 2 subspherical, unequal seminal capsules. + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Ghana +, +Oman +, +Yemen +( +Boorman & Harten 2002 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F86FFFA3FD973BA6FE65F837.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F86FFFA3FD973BA6FE65F837.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0e9c568a72f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F86FFFA3FD973BA6FE65F837.xml @@ -0,0 +1,507 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Sphaeromias pictus +( +Meigen, 1818 +) + + + + + + + + + +Ceratopogon pictus +Meigen, 1818: 80 + + +( +♀ +, +Germany +). + + + + + + +Ceratopogon punctatus +Meigen, 1830: 264 + + +( +♀ +, probably +Germany +). + + + + + + +Ceratopogon elegans +Winnertz, 1852: 58 + + +( +♀ +, +Poland +). + + + + + + +Xylocrypta miricornis +Kieffer, 1919: 77 + + +( +♂ +, +Hungary +). + + + + + +Sphaeromias pictus + +– + +Goetghebuer 1934: 59 + +(combination; = + +C +. +elegans + +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Body brown, scutellum slightly paler. Legs brown, mid and hind legs darkest; fore tibia with distinct pale band at apex (poorly developed on mid tibia); tarsomeres 1–4 yellow, with more or less brown tips, tarsomeres 5 brown; fore femur slightly swollen, with 8–9 ventral spines, mid femur slender, with 5–6 spines, hind femur with 8–10 spines; tarsomeres 5 with 6 massive ventral batonnets; female claws equal, long, curved, with basal inner teeth. Female with 2 sub-equal, rounded seminal capsules with short necks, and distinct seminal duct. + + + +Table 1. +Zoogeographical elements among the Middle East +Palpomyiini +and +Sphaeromiini +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Afrotropical +
+ +Bezzia melanoflava + +Senegal; Yemen
+ +Phaenobezzia spekei + +Uganda; Yemen
+ +Homohelea telmatoscopa + +Ghana; Yemen
+ +Nilobezzia nigritibialis + +Ghana; Oman, Yemen
+Saharo-Arabian +
+ +Bezzia libanensis + +sp. nov. +Lebanon
+ +Bezzia mellori + +Oman
+ +Bezzia naseri + +Yemen
+ +Bezzia sharjahi + +sp. nov. +United Arab Emirates, Yemen
+ +Palpomyia buettikeri + +Saudi Arabia
+ +Palpomyia ebejeri + +Oman, United Arab Emirates
+ +Palpomyia mahyoubi + +Yemen
+ +Palpomyia nakali + +Oman
+ +Palpomyia freidbergi + +sp. nov. +Israel
+ +Johannsenomyia imparunguis + +Egypt
+ +Macropeza nuda + +Egypt
+ +Nilobezzia nilotica + +Egypt
+Palearctic +
+ +Bezzia albicornis + +Algeria, Afghanistan, Europe, South Africa; Egypt, Israel, Lebanon, United Arab Emirates, Yemen
+ +Bezzia fuliginata + +Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Europe, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan; Israel, Lebanon
+ +Bezzia flavicornis + +Azerbaijan, Central Russia, Europe, Kyrgyzstan; Israel
+ +Bezzia kuhetiensis + +Azerbaijan, Ukraine; Turkey
+ +Bezzia pachypyga + +Tajikistan, Turkmenistan; Oman, United Arab Emirates
+ +Palpomyia schmidti + +Azerbaijan, Europe, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, S Russia, Tajikistan; Iran, Iraq, Turkey
+ +Palpomyia flavipes + +Armenia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Europe; Turkey, Israel
+ +Palpomyia serripes + +Armenia, Georgia, Europe, Tunisia; Turkey
+ +Sphaeromias pictus + +China, Europe, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia; Israel
+Holarctic (Palearctic + Nearctic) +
+ +Palpomyia tibialis + +North America, Azerbaijan, N China, Europe, Georgia, Japan, N and NW Russia, Tajikistan; Turkey
+ + + + +Material examined + + + +ISRAEL +: +1 ♀ +, Golan Aniam, +18 May 1983 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +); +2 ♀♀ +, Hula, +1 Jul. 1993 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +); +1 ♀ +, Berekhat Ya’ar, +14 May 2003 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +); +2 ♀♀ +, same collection data except +23 May 2003 +( +TAU +); +1 ♀ +, En HaHoresh, +21 May 2005 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Belarus +, +Belgium +, +Great Britain +, +China +, +Czech Republic +, +Estonia +, +Finland +, +France +, +Germany +, +Hungary +, +Italy +, +Japan +, +Kazakhstan +, +Kyrgyzstan +, +Latvia +, +Lithuania +, +Poland +, +Russia +(central, northwest and southern regions), +Slovakia +, +Ukraine +( +Remm 1988 +; + +Szadziewski +et al. +2013 + +). We provide the first records for the Middle East, from +Israel +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F871FFB3FEBF3BFEFDFBFE50.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F871FFB3FEBF3BFEFDFBFE50.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1345636a58b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F871FFB3FEBF3BFEFDFBFE50.xml @@ -0,0 +1,320 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + + +Bezzia +( +Homobezzia +) +sharjahi + +Alwin-Kownacka & Szadziewski + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +07610F8D-C955-4FD8-851A-395BA06AFB87 + + + +Fig. 2 + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +This new species differs from all other Middle East congeners in having the following combination of characters: thorax orange-brown with distinctly paler scutellum; legs uniformly brownish; fore femur with 6–9 ventral spines; male gonostylus long, with pointed apex; parameres long, slender, slightly curved dorsally; female with 2 subspherical seminal capsules with very long necks. + + + + +Etymology + + + +The specific name refers to the +Sharjah +Desert, where most of the +type +series was collected. + + + + + +Material examined + + + + + +Holotype + + + +UNITED ARAB EMIRATES +: +♂ +, adult, +Sharjah +Desert Park +, + +18 Jan. 2005 + +, +A. van Harten +leg. ( +CEIUG +). + + + + +Paratypes + + + +UNITED ARAB EMIRATES +: +3 ♀♀ +, +3 ♂♂ +, same collection data as +holotype +except +18–25 Jan. 2005 +, light trap; +3 ♀♀ +, +1 ♂ +, same collection data except +9 Mar. 2005 +; +1 ♀ +, same collection data except +30 Apr. 2005 +; +1 ♀ +, same collection data except +30 Jun. 2005 +; +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +, same collection data except +21 Jul. 2005 +; +1 ♀ +, Wadi Wurayah, light trap, +15 Jan.–22 Feb. 2009 +, A. van Harten leg. ( +CEIUG +). + + +YEMEN +: +2 ♀♀ +, Al Mukalla, light trap, +1. Feb. 2003 +, A. van Harten leg. ( +CEIUG +). + + + + + +Description + + + +Male + + +HEAD. Uniformly pale brown. Antenna ( +Fig. 2B +) pale brown; flagellar plume poorly developed; flagellomeres 2(3)–13 with paler basal halves; flagellomeres 10–13 short; total flagellum length +0.50– 0.70 mm +; antennal ratio 0.50–0.70. Palpus yellow, slender; third palpal segment short, with distinct capitate sensilla; palpal ratio 2.00. + + +THORAX. Orange-brown; scutellum paler. Wing pale, with barely visible veins; 1 poorly marked long radial cell; wing length +0.90–1.30 mm +; costal ratio 0.70–0.80. Legs uniformly pale brown, tarsi slightly paler, coxae dark brown; claws small and equal on all legs; fore femur armed with 4–8 short ventral spines; tarsal ratio of fore leg 1.60–1.90, of mid leg 1.80–2.30, of hind leg 2.10–2.20. + +ABDOMEN. Orange brown. + +GENITALIA ( +Fig. 2 +D–F). Tergite IX short, reaching apex of gonocoxite; sternite IX short. Gonocoxite short, stout; gonostylus long, narrow, distal half curved, with sharp apex. Parameres ( +Fig. 2E +) fused, tongue-like, slightly curved dorsally, with blunt apex. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 2F +) triangular, with low basal arch and barely visible rounded apex. + + +Female + + +HEAD. Brown. Antennal flagellum ( +Fig. 2C +) with short flagellomeres, brown, proximal portions yellow; total flagellum length +0.50–0.70 mm +; antennal ratio 0.80–1.10. Palpus slender, yellow; third palpal segment short, rather stout, without sensory pit; palpal ratio 2.00–2.50. Mandible with 6–8 massive distal teeth and numerous smaller proximal teeth. + + +THORAX. Orange brown; scutellum paler. Wing ( +Fig. 2A +) venation similar to that of male; wing length +1.70–1.80 mm +; costal ratio 0.80. Femoral coloration as in male; fore femur armed with 6–9 ventral spines; fore and mid tibiae with slightly dark bases, occasionally with slightly darker central areas, and dark apices; hind tibia with slightly darker base; tarsal ratio of fore leg 1.80–2.10, of mid leg 1.90–2.50, of hind leg 2.00–2.50. + + +ABDOMEN. Two subspherical seminal capsules ( +Fig. 2G +) with long, thick necks; measuring 0.04–0.05 × +0.03–0.04 mm +and 0.05–0.06 × +0.04–0.05 mm +. + + + + + +Distribution + + + +United Arab Emirates +and +Yemen +. + + + + +Fig. 2. + +Bezzia sharjahi +Szadziewski & Alwin + +sp. nov. +A +. Wing, ♀. +B +. Antennal flagellum, ♂. +C +. Antennal flagellum, ♀. +D +. Genitalia, ♂. +E +. Parameres. +F +. Aedeagus. +G +. Seminal capsules, ♀. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +This new species is a typical member of the subgenus + +Homobezzia + +. It most closely resembles + +B. kuhetiensis + +, which has similar male genitalia and seminal capsules. However, + +B. kuhetiensis + +differs from + +B +. +sharjahi + +sp. nov. +by its whitish legs with distinct, dark bands, the fore femur has only 2 ventral spines, and the parameres are straight. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F871FFBCFD913F12FAF1FCCB.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F871FFBCFD913F12FAF1FCCB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5d7a69a7602 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F871FFBCFD913F12FAF1FCCB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Subgenus + +Homobezzia +Macfie, 1932 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + + + + + +Homobezzia nyasae +Macfie, 1932 + +; by original designation. + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Fore femur with or without ventral spines (all Middle East species with fore femoral spines). Male flagellomere 10 shorter than 11; flagellar plume poorly developed. Male aedeagus covered with fine setae on ventral surface; gonostylus elongate ( +Krzywiński 1995 +). + + + + + + +Key to males of + +Bezzia +( +Homobezzia +) + +of the Middle East + + + + + + + + + +1. Legs pale yellow, with dark bands; submedian process of male parameres straight ........................... .................................................................................................................. + +B. kuhetiensis +Remm, 1967 + + + + + +– Legs pale brown, without dark bands; submedian process of male parameres slightly curved ventrally .......................................................................................... + +B. sharjahi +Alwin & Szadziewski + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F871FFBCFDD03D54FADCFA2C.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F871FFBCFDD03D54FADCFA2C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c569821dd59 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F871FFBCFDD03D54FADCFA2C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + + +Bezzia +( +Homobezzia +) +kuhetiensis + +Remm, 1967 + + + + + + + + + +Bezzia kuhetiensis +Remm, 1967: 33 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, +Azerbaijan +). + + + + + +Bezzia kuhetiensis + +– + +Turgut & Kilic 2015: 14 + +( +♀ +, record, +Turkey +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Thorax brown, scutellum paler. Head brown. Palpus yellow. Flagellomeres 1–8 yellow, 9–13 brown on distal portions. Femora pale yellow or white, with dark brown band on apex; fore femur with small smoky area near apex, with 2 ventral spines; tibiae white, with dark brown bands on apical and basal portions; fore tibia with another dark brown band on middle portion; tarsomeres white, with darker apices. Wing pale. Abdomen pale brown. Female with 2 round seminal capsules with long, thick necks. Male genitalia with long tergite IX; gonocoxite stout, moderately short, slender, curved and gonostylus with sharply pointed apex; parameres fused, base W-shaped, with long, straight, slender distal process; aedeagus triangular, slender, with low basal arch and barely visible rounded apex ( +Remm 1967 +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Azerbaijan +, +Ukraine +( +Remm 1988 +). In the Middle East recorded from +Turkey +( +Turgut & Kilic 2015 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F872FFBFFE0E3DB2FE8AFA7B.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F872FFBFFE0E3DB2FE8AFA7B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..173027351c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F872FFBFFE0E3DB2FE8AFA7B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Bezzia (Bezzia) mellori +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + + + + + + + + + +Bezzia mellori +Boorman & van Harten, 2002: 456 + + +( +♂ +, figure, description, +Oman +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +An orange +- +brown species. Scutum with darker band on lateral sides, humeral areas paler. Legs pale; femorotibial joints darker; femora unarmed; fore femur with darker dorsal central area near apex; mid femur with narrow, darker dorsal area on apical portion; hind femur and tibiae with vague indications of similar markings. Male genitalia with rather long gonocoxite and short, blunt gonostylus; parameres fused, slender with broad base and expanded slender, triangular, with blunt appendix and high basal arch ( +Boorman & van Harten 2002 +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Oman +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F872FFBFFE313BA7FE91F820.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F872FFBFFE313BA7FE91F820.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3ed5f704bf6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F872FFBFFE313BA7FE91F820.xml @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + + +Bezzia +( +Bezzia +) +naseri + +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + + + + + + + + + +Bezzia naseri +Boorman & van Harten, 2002: 457 + + +( +♂ +, figure, description, +Yemen +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Scutum dark brown, scutellum paler. Legs yellowish, with brown bands; fore femur with faint dark band at apical ⅔; fore and mid tibiae with dark bands at/near proximal ⅓ and apex; mid femur with a single dark apical band; hind femur and tibia with wide dark sub-basal and subapical bands; fore femur armed with 2 spines. Male genitalia short, with long, evenly curved gonostylus, with pointed apical portion; parameres fused, with low basal arch, distal portion moderately stout, apex with 2 bifid pointed divergent processes; aedeagus slender, with broad base, low basal arch and blunt apex ( +Boorman & van Harten 2002 +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Yemen +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F874FFBFFE573D3AFD7EFC6E.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F874FFBFFE573D3AFD7EFC6E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..04d6740efa7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F874FFBFFE573D3AFD7EFC6E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + + +Bezzia +( +Bezzia +) +libanensis + +Alwin-Kownacka & Szadziewski + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +B1B97EC8-DFA5-4537-BB13-FAC1B73487C6 + + + +Fig. 1 + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +A small dark brown species without fore femoral spines. The male genitalia are unique in having a greatly elongate sternite IX, with narrow V-shaped caudomedian cleft, and a Y-shaped aedeagus without ventral spicules and an abruptly tapered, sharply pointed apex. Female unknown. + + + + +Etymology + + + +The specific name refers to the Latin name of +Lebanon +( +Libanus +), where the +holotype +was collected. + + + + + +Material examined + + + + + +Holotype + + + +LEBANON +: +♂ +, +Fanar +, +33º52.680′ N +, +35º33.547′ E +, + +138 m + +a.s.l, at light, + +6 May 2012 + +, +P. Dominiak +leg. ( +CEIUG +). + + + + + + +Description + + + +Male + + +HEAD. Uniformly brown. Antenna ( +Fig. 1C +) pale brown; flagellomeres 10–13 predominately dark brown; flagellomere 10 elongate, considerably longer than 11–13; total flagellum length +0.90 mm +; antennal ratio 0.70. Palpus slender, brownish; segment 3 slender with few sensilla capitata; palpal ratio 4.00. + + +THORAX ( +Fig. 1B +). Dark brown. Wing ( +Fig. 1A +) veins pale; 1 poorly marked elongate radial cell; wing length +1.30 mm +; costal ratio 0.60. Halter brown. Legs ( +Figs. 1 +D–F) with brown coxae; all femora without ventral spines; fore and mid femora yellowish, proximal ½ of venter brown and with subapical, apical dark brown bands; hind femur brown, with apical, subapical yellow bands; tibiae brown, with sub-basal, subapical yellow bands; tarsi yellow, with pale brown apices, tarsomeres 4–5 slightly darker than 1–3; tarsal ratio of fore leg 2.20, of mid leg 2.40, of hind leg 2.20. + + +ABDOMEN ( +Fig. 1G +). Brown. + + +GENITALIA ( +Fig. 1 +G–J). Sternite IX heavily sclerotized, long, apex extending to mid-length of gonocoxites, with narrow, V-shaped caudomedian cleft. Tergite IX short, slender, with elongate cerci. Gonocoxite short, stout; gonostylus moderately long, nearly straight, slightly curved distally, apex tapered, with pointed tip. Parameres ( +Fig. 1I +) fused, rod-like; basal arms short, broad, bifurcate with unequal-length prongs; distal portion slightly vasiform, with heavily sclerotized margins, apical ⅓ narrower, more lightly sclerotized, with rounded tip. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 1J +) with bare ventral membrane; basal arms broad, heavily sclerotized; basal arch curved, extending ⅓ of total aedeagus length; distal portion short, margin heavily sclerotized, with sharply pointed apex. + + + +Fig. 1. + +Bezzia libanensis +Alwin & Szadziewski + +sp. nov. +, ♂. +A +. Wing. +B +. Thorax. +C +. Antennal scape and flagellum. +D +. Fore leg. +E +. Mid leg. +F +. Hind leg. +G +. Male genitalia. +H +. Male genitalia, ventral view. +I +. Parameres. +J +. Aedeagus. + + + +Female + +Unknown. + + + + +Distribution + + + +Lebanon +; known only from the +type +locality. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +The male antennal flagellum of this new species has an elongate flagellomere 10 and a bare aedeagus, characters typical of members of the subgenus + +Bezzia + +. This new species differs from all other Palearctic and Afrotropical members of the genus by its greatly elongate sternite IX, which extends to the midlength of the gonocoxites and covers their bases. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F875FFB8FDB73C27FAF1FB15.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F875FFB8FDB73C27FAF1FB15.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1db7d3d6f80 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F875FFB8FDB73C27FAF1FB15.xml @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Subgenus + +Bezzia +Kieffer, 1899 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Fore femur with or without ventral spines. Male flagellum with flagellomere 10 elongate, longer than distal segments 11–13. Male flagellar plume well developed. Male aedeagus without spicules on ventral membrane; gonostylus elongate, simple ( +Krzywiński 1995 +). + + + + + + +Key to males of + +Bezzia +( +Bezzia +) + +of the Middle East + + + + + + + + +1. Fore femur with l or more ventral spines..........................................................................................2 + + +– Fore femur without ventral spines.....................................................................................................3 + + + + + +2. Hind femur and tibia uniformly brown; gonostylus with blunt apex ............................................... .............................................................................................................. + +B. flavicornis +( +Staeger, 1839 +) + + + + + +– Hind femur and tibia yellow, with brown subapical and subbasal bands; gonostylus with sharply pointed apex ........................................................................ + +B. naseri +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + + + + + + + +3. Sternite IX of male genitalia very long; gonostylus with sharply pointed apex ................................ ...................................................................................... + +B. libanensis +Alwin & Szadziewski + +sp. nov. + + + + +– Sternite IX of male genitalia short; gonostylus with blunt apex ..................................................... ........................................................................................... + +B. mellori +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F875FFB9FDCE3B06FE24FD11.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F875FFB9FDCE3B06FE24FD11.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8a82f660fc7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F875FFB9FDCE3B06FE24FD11.xml @@ -0,0 +1,348 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Bezzia + +( +Bezzia +) +flavicornis + +( +Staeger, 1839 +) + + + + + + + + + +Ceratopogon flavicornis +Staeger, 1839: 599 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, +Denmark +). + + + + + + +Ceratopogon flavipalpis +Winnertz, 1852: 80 + + +( +♀ +, +Germany +). + + + + + + +Bezzia flavipluma +Kieffer, 1919: 126 + + +( +♂ +, +Hungary +). + + + + + + +Bezzia spinifera +Goetghebuer, 1920: 106 + + +( +♂ +, +Belgium +). + + + + + + +Bezzia spinosula +Clastrier, 1962: 100 + + +( +♂ +, +France +). + + + + + +Bezzia flavipalpis + +– + +Kieffer 1901: 153 + +( +♀ +, key). + + + + + +Bezzia flavicornis + +– + +Edwards 1926: 423 + +( +♀ +, +England +; = + +C +. +flavipalpis + +, + +B. spinifera + +?). — + +Goetghebuer 1934: 79 + +( +♀ +, key, distribution). — + +Remm 1988: 30 + +(distribution; = + +C. flavipalpis +, +B. flavipluma +, +B. spinifera +, +B. spinosula + +). — + +Krzywiński 1995: 138 + +( +♀ +, +♂ +, +Poland +, +Bulgaria +, +Switzerland +, +France +, +Denmark +). + + + + + +Bezzia spinifera + +– + +Zilahi-Sebess 1940: 106 + +( +♂ +, +Hungary +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +A large orange +- +brown species. Scutum and scutellum darker than remainder of thorax. Wing pale; wing length +2.20 mm +; costal ratio 0.80. Palpus yellowish; palpal ratio 4.50. Fore femur with 2–4 ventral spines; fore and mid femora brownish; fore and mid tibiae brown with distinct yellow subapical band; hind femur and tibia dark brown; tarsi yellow, fith tarsomeres slightly darker; tarsal ratio of fore leg 2.10, of mid leg 2.20, of hind leg 2.00. Abdomen pale brown. Female with 2 large ovoid seminal capsules with short necks, one larger than the other. Male gonocoxite short, straight and thick; gonostylus short, simple, with blunt apex. Parameres fused, slightly expanded in middle, with V-shaped excavation on apical portion. Aedeagus Y-shaped, with long submedian process and blunt apex ( +Clastrier 1962 +; +Krzywiński 1995 +). + + + + + +Material examined + + + +ISRAEL +: +1 ♀ +, Baniass, +24 Apr. 1982 +, F. Kaplan leg. ( +TAU +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Europe ( +Austria +, +Belarus +, +Belgium +, +Bulgaria +, +Czech Republic +, +Denmark +, +Estonia +, +France +, +Germany +, +Great Britain +, +Hungary +, +Latvia +, +Lithuania +, +Netherlands +, +Poland +, +Switzerland +, +Ukraine +), central +Russia +, +Azerbaijan +and +Kyrgyzstan +( +Remm 1988 +; + +Szadziewski +et al. +2013 + +). We provide the first record of this species from +Israel +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F876FFB8FDAB3B7BFAF1FDFA.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F876FFB8FDAB3B7BFAF1FDFA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1e3b6c0f2f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F876FFB8FDAB3B7BFAF1FDFA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Genus + +Bezzia +Kieffer, 1899 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + + + + + +Ceratopogon ornatus +Meigen, 1830 + +; by original designation. + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Body nearly bare, with robust thorax. Wing with 1 radial cell; membrane without macrotrichia. Legs slender; fore femur with 0–12 ventral spines, mid and hind femora sometimes with ventral spines; fourth tarsomeres short, more or less cordiform; fifth tarsomeres of female without ventral batonnets; female claws simple, equal-sized, usually with small inner tooth. Female abdomen with paired internal tergal apodemes and usually 2 seminal capsules. Male genitalia with short tergite IX; parameres fused, usually rod-like but sometimes variable in shape; gonostylus well developed (de +Meillon & Wirth 1991 +). + + + + + + +Key to males of subgenera of Middle East + +Bezzia + + + + + + + + + + +1. Aedeagus shield-shaped, with slender, long submedian process ( +Fig. 3C +).......................................2 + + + + +– Aedeagus Y-shaped, without slender, long submedian process ( +Fig. 1J +).......................................3 + + + + + + +2. Gonocoxite elongate, slender; gonostylus short, divided into 3–4 tooth-like lobes .......................... ...................................................................................................................... + +Pygobezzia +Remm, 1974 + + + + + +– Gonocoxite short, stout; gonostylus long, slender, not divided into lobes ........................................ ....................................................................................................................... + +Sivabezzia +Remm, 1974 + + + + + + + +3. Aedeagus bare; flagellomere 10 longer than 11 ( +Fig. 1C +) .................................... + +Bezzia +Kieffer, 1899 + + + + + +– Aedeagus covered with short, spine-like setae; flagellomere 10 shorter than 11 ( +Fig. 2B +) ............. ................................................................................................................... + +Homobezzia +Macfie, 1932 + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F876FFBBFD993DFBFAF1FAD6.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F876FFBBFD993DFBFAF1FAD6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d3bc63228f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F876FFBBFD993DFBFAF1FAD6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Tribe + +Palpomyiini +Enderlein, 1936 + + + + + + + + +Key to genera of Middle East +Palpomyiini + + + + + + + + + +1. Wing with two radial cells ........................................................................ + +Palpomyia +Meigen, 1818 + + + + +– Wing with one radial cell..................................................................................................................2 + + + + + +2. Female fifth tarsomeres armed with stout ventral setae with sharp, bent tips; gonostylus of male genitalia greatly reduced in size or absent ...................................... + +Phaenobezzia +Haeselbarth, 1965 + + + + + +– Female fifth tarsomeres usually unarmed (some species in the subgenus + +Homobezzia + +have 2 partial ventrolateral rows of setae); gonostylus of male genitalia well developed ......... + +Bezzia +Kieffer, 1899 + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F878FFAAFD9B38E4FD68FCB7.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F878FFAAFD9B38E4FD68FCB7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f9d64519f2b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F878FFAAFD9B38E4FD68FCB7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,296 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Palpomyia serripes +( +Meigen, 1818 +) + + + + + + + + + +Ceratopogon serripes +Meigen, 1818: 82 + + +( +♀ +, +Germany +). + + + + + + +Ceratopogon flavitarsis +Meigen, 1838: 20 + + +( +♀ +, locality unknown). + + + + + + +Ceratopogon transfuga +Staeger, 1839: 598 + + +( +♀ +, +Denmark +). + + + + + + +Ceratopogon tarsatus +Zetterstedt, 1855: 4874 + + +( +♀ +, +Sweden +). + + + + + + +Palpomyia ruficeps +Kieffer, 1918: 59 + + +( +♀ +, +Tunisia +). + + + + + +Palpomyia serripes + +– + +Kieffer 1906: 63 + +(combination). — + +Goetghebuer 1920: 20 + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, +Belgium +); 1934: 72 ( +♂ +, +♀ +; = + +P. ruficeps + +). — + +Edwards 1926: 422 + +( +♂ +, +♀ +; = + +C. transfuga +, +P. tarsatus + +). — + +Szadziewski 1986: 87 + +( +♀ +, redescription, distribution, +Sweden +). — + +Krzywiński 1995: 55 + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, +Poland +, +Sweden +). — + +Turgut & Kilic 2015: 14 + +( +♀ +, +Turkey +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Body blackish-brown. Palpus and flagellum brown. Legs blackish-brown; fore femur and tarsomeres 1–2 paler, darker distally; tarsomeres 3–5 brown. All femora armed with spines; fore femur with 3–6, mid femur with 0–3 and hind femur with 0–3 spines. Female with 2 round seminal capsules with distinct necks. Parameres in male genitalia broad and separated on distal half. + + + + +Distribution + + + +Armenia +, Europe ( +Austria +, +Belgium +, +Czech Republic +, +Croatia +, +Denmark +, +Estonia +, +Finland +, +France +, +Germany +, +Great Britain +, +Hungary +, +Ireland +, +Italy +, +Lithuania +, +Netherlands +, +Norway +, +Poland +, +Slovakia +, +Spain +, +Sweden +, +Switzerland +), +Tunisia +, Georgia and +Japan +. In the Middle East known from +Turkey +( + +Szadziewski +et al. +2013 + +; +Turgut & Kilic 2015 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F878FFB5FE283C1AFD9DFB2E.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F878FFB5FE283C1AFD9DFB2E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b7bf917c9cb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F878FFB5FE283C1AFD9DFB2E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Palpomyia ebejeri +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + + + + + + + + + +Palpomyia ebejeri +Boorman & van Harten, 2002: 458 + + +( +♂ +, figure, description, +Oman +). + + + + + +Palpomyia ebejeri + +– + + +Szadziewski +et al +. 2011: 651 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, description, +United Arab Emirates +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Pale brown species. Legs brown, tarsi paler; fore femur and bases of mid and hind femora pale; male fore femur with 2–3 short spines; mid and hind femora with 1 ventral spine near apex; female fore femur with 8–10, mid femur with 5, hind femur with 7 spines. Male gonostylus short, triangular, without ventral setae; gonocoxite short, massive, base ventrally expanded; parameres apparently completely separated, apex pointed, strongly bent outwardly; aedeagus with high basal arch and expanded apex. Female with 2 small seminal capsules with short necks. + + + + +Material examined + + + +UNITED ARAB EMIRATES +: +1 ♂ +, Wadi Maidaq, light trap, +27 Nov. 2005 +, A. van Harten leg. ( +CEIUG +); +1 ♀ +, Hatta, light trap, +30 Jan.–26 Feb. 2006 +, A. van Harten leg. ( +CEIUG +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Oman +, +United Arab Emirates +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F878FFB5FE343AF3FE91F93B.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F878FFB5FE343AF3FE91F93B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7add5ed72db --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F878FFB5FE343AF3FE91F93B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Palpomyia mahyoubi +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + + + + + + + + + +Palpomyia mahyoubi +Boorman & van Harten, 2002: 458 + + +( +♂ +, figure, description, +Yemen +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Abdomen, scutum, scutellum, femora and tibiae dark brown, without markings. Femora slightly paler toward bases; tarsomeres 1–4 pale, tarsomeres 5 uniformly dark brown; femora with 3 ventral spines. Male gonocoxite slender, elongate, with inner expansion; gonostylus nearly straight (the illustration of the male genitalia in +Boorman & van Harten (2002) +is inaccurate); parameres fused, slender, apex not visible in original illustration; aedeagus with very high basal arch, apex plate-like ( +Boorman & van Harten 2002 +). Female unknown. + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Yemen +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F879FFB5FE3A38A8FEDBFE31.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F879FFB5FE3A38A8FEDBFE31.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..94f836aa44d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F879FFB5FE3A38A8FEDBFE31.xml @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Palpomyia buettikeri +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + + + + + + + + + +Palpomyia buettikeri +Boorman & van Harten, 2002: 458 + + +( +♂ +, figure, description, +Saudi Arabia +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Scutum dark brown. Costa reaching more than ¾ of wing length. Legs uniformly brown; fore femur with 11–12 dark ventral spines; mid femur with 4 longer, more slender spines; hind femur with about 12 very long, slender spines; hind tibia with long dorsal bristles; fifth tarsomeres without ventral setae. Male gonocoxite short, stout, with subapical ventral lobe; gonostylus slender, curved, apex pointed; parameres fused, narrowed basally, distal half cylindrical, expanded; aedeagus triangular, with broad apex ( +Boorman & van Harten 2002 +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Saudi Arabia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F87AFFB4FD88382BFAF1F9A4.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87AFFB4FD88382BFAF1F9A4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ef4f0171dc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87AFFB4FD88382BFAF1F9A4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,285 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Genus + +Palpomyia +Meigen, 1818 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + + + + + +Ceratopogon flavipes +Meigen, 1804 + +; by original designation. + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Wing with 2 radial cells, costa extending at least ⅔ wing length, but not to apex. Fore femur slender to swollen, usually with stout ventral spines; mid and hind femora slender, often with ventral spines; fifth tarsomeres with or without 2 ventro-lateral rows of stout bristle-like setae; female claws equal, small to enlarged, with or without small, basal inner tooth. Female abdomen with paired internal tergal apodemes and 2 seminal capsules. Male genitalia with prominent cerci; gonocoxite simple or with lobe; aedeagus + +conical or triangular, with well developed basal arms; parameres fused or divided, usually with welldeveloped basal apodemes (de +Meillon & Wirth 1991 +). + + + + + +Remarks + + + +There are no universally recognized subgenera of + +Palpomyia + +; however, four species groups have been proposed for this genus: + +distincta + +group, + +flavipes + +group, +lineata +group and + +tibialis + +group ( +Grogan & Wirth 1975 +, +1979 +; + +Spinelli +et al. +2009 + +). + + + + + + +Key to males of Middle East + +Palpomyia + + + + + + + + + +1. Gonostylus short, triangular..............................................................................................................2 + + +– Gonostylus long, more or less subcylindrical..................................................................................3 + + + + + +2. Ventral surface of gonostylus covered with numerous coarse ventral setae ..................................... .................................................................................................................... + +P. tibialis +( +Meigen, 1818 +) + + + + + +– Ventral surface of gonostylus bare ....................................... + +P. ebejeri +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + + + + + + + +3. Parameres completely separated ........................................................ + +P. schmidti +Goetghebuer, 1934 + + + + +– Parameres fused.................................................................................................................................4 + + + + + +4. Parameres divided into 2 lobes on distal portion ................................. + +P. serripes +( +Meigen, 1818 +) + + + + +– Parameres completely fused on distal portion.................................................................................5 + + + + +5. Femora with ventral spines...............................................................................................................6 + + +– Only fore femur with ventral spines..................................................................................................7 + + + + + +6. Hind tibia with long dorsal bristles; fore and hind femora with 11–12 spines ................................. ........................................................................................ + +P. buettikeri +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + + + + + +– Hind tibia without long dorsal bristles; fore and hind femora with 3 spines ................................. ....................................................................................... + +P. mahyoubi +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + + + + + + + +7. Hind tibia yellow; fore femur with 3 spines ..................... + +P. nakali +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + + + + +– Hind tibia dark brown; fore femur with 4–8 spines.......................................................................8 + + + + + +8. Body with flattened setae with thin whip-like ends. Femora as well as fore and mid tibiae with dark apices. Male gonocoxite short; gonostylus slender; parameres with blunt expanded apex ..... ................................................................................................................... + +P. flavipes +( +Meigen, 1804 +) + + + + + + +– Body with simple bristle +- +like setae. Only hind femur with dark apex. Male gonocoxite elongate; gonostylus swollen on basal portion; parameres with pointed apex .................................................. ........................................................................................ + +P. freidbergi +Alwin & Szadziewski + +sp. nov + +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F87AFFB7FE2D3DC7FE07F9E6.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87AFFB7FE2D3DC7FE07F9E6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3da8e5ebb09 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87AFFB7FE2D3DC7FE07F9E6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + + +Bezzia +( +Sivabezzia +) +melanoflava + +Clastrier, 1958 + + + + + + +Fig. 3 +E–I + + + + + + + +Bezzia melanoflava +Clastrier, 1958: 235 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, figures, description, +Senegal +). + + + + + +Bezzia melanoflava + +– + +Boorman & van Harten 2002: 456 + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, figure, description, +Yemen +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +This species differs from + +B. pachypyga + +in having yellowish legs with indistinct dark brown bands and femora with 2–3 spines. Male gonocoxite simple, without any process ( +Fig. 3E +); parameres slender, rodlike; aedeagus short, with low basal arch, and dorsal, submedian processes shorter than parameres ( +Figs. 3 +F–H) ( +Clastrier 1958 +; +Boorman & van Harten 2002 +). Female with 2 conical seminal capsules, widest on middle portion, with long necks ( +Fig. 3I +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Senegal +, +Yemen +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F87CFFB1FD9C3F12FAF1FBAB.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87CFFB1FD9C3F12FAF1FBAB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a95b2104b23 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87CFFB1FD9C3F12FAF1FBAB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Subgenus + +Sivabezzia +Remm, 1974 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + + + + + +Bezzia campanai +Clastrier, 1962 + +; by original designation. + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Fore femur with 2–4 ventral spines. Male flagellomere 10 elongate, longer than 11–13. Gonocoxite massive; gonostylus well developed, simple; aedeagus composed of small lamella and long median process, which is bent dorsally and directed posteriorly. Female with 2 large seminal capsules, more or less similar in size, both with long necks that are narrowed proximally. + + + + +Remarks + + + +Females of + +B. melanoflava +Clastrier, 1958 + +and + +B. pachypyga +Remm, 1974 + +are very similar, with only slight differences in the shapes of their seminal capsules. In + +B. melanoflava + +they are broadest near the middle portion, whereas in + +B. pachypyga + +the widest part is near the proximal portion. + + + + + + +Key to species of + +Bezzia +( +Sivabezzia +) + +of the Middle East + + + + + + + + + +1. Male genitalia with broad parameres ( +Fig. 3B +); submedian process of aedeagus longer than parameres ( +Fig. 3C +); ventral surface of gonocoxite with distinct apical process ( +Fig. 3A +); seminal capsule broadest on proximal portion ( +Fig. 3D +) ......................................... + +B. pachypyga +Remm, 1974 + + + + + +– Male genitalia with parameres slender ( +Fig. 3F +); submedian process of aedeagus shorter than parameres ( +Fig. 3 +G–H); gonocoxite without subapical process ( +Fig. 3E +); seminal capsule broadest on middle portion ( +Fig. 3I +) ................................................................... + +B. melanoflava +Clastrier, 1958 + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F87CFFB7FDC03A74FD40FC5A.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87CFFB7FDC03A74FD40FC5A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d92bfcdcc79 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87CFFB7FDC03A74FD40FC5A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,353 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + +Bezzia (Sivabezzia) pachypyga +Remm, 1974 + + + + + + +Fig. 3 +A–D + + + + + + + +Bezzia pachypyga +Remm, 1974: 441 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, figures, +Tajikistan +, +Turkmenistan +). + + + + + + +Bezzia omanensis +Boorman & van Harten, 2002: 456 + + +( +♂ +, figures, +Oman +). +Syn. nov. + + + + + +Bezzia omanensis + +– + + +Szadziewski +et al +. 2011: 649 + + +( +♂ +, record, +United Arab Emirates +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Male + + +Dark orange +- +brown species with brownish head; scutum and scutellum same color as rest of thorax. Antenna pale brown, except apical portion of flagellomeres 10 and 11–13, which are darker; flagellomere 10 elongate, longer than 11–13. Palpus pale brown, slender; third segment slender, slightly longer than fourth segment. Legs slender, orange +- +brown; mid and hind femora darker towards apical portion, without ventral spines; fore femur uniformly brownish, with 3–4 ventral spines; tibiae with a vaguely defined wide, pale central band and narrow, pale basal band; tarsomeres 1–4 yellow, 5 brownish. Male genitalia short ( +Fig. 3A +); sternite IX short, with V-shaped caudomedian excavation; gonocoxite almost 2 × longer than broad, with distinct stout apical process on ventral surface; gonostylus simple, stout, slightly curved, with distinct apical tooth; parameres broad, shield-shaped, distal portion expanded, with massive W-shaped base and concave apex ( +Fig. 3B +); aedeagus short, with low basal arch and armed with slender, dorsal apicomedian process, longer than parameres ( +Fig. 3C +). + + +Female + + +Similar to male with usual sexual differences. Two large seminal capsules, widest in proximal part, both with long necks ( +Fig. 3D +). + + + + +Fig. 3. + +Bezzia +( +Sivabezzia +) + +spp. +A–D +. + +Bezzia pachypyga + +, ♂ (from +Remm 1974 +). +A +. Genitalia, ♂. +B +. Parameres. +C +. Aedeagus. +D +. Seminal capsules, ♀. – +E–I +. + +Bezzia melanoflava + +(from +Clastrier 1958 +). +E +. Genitalia, ♂. +F +. Parameres. +G +. Aedeagus, ventral view. +H +. Aedeagus, lateral view. +I +. Seminal capsules, ♀. + + + + + +Material examined + + + +UNITED ARAB EMIRATES +: +4 ♂♂ +, +Sharjah +Desert Park, light trap, +18–25 Jan. 2005 +, A. van Harten leg. ( +CEIUG +); +4 ♀♀ +, +1 ♂ +, same collection data except +16 Jun.–21 Jul. 2005 +( +CEIUG +); +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +, same collection data except +20 Oct. 2005 +( +CEIUG +); +1 ♂ +, same collection data except +10 Dec. 2005 +( +CEIUG +); +1 ♂ +, +7 ♀♀ +, same collection data except +1–30 Nov. 2008 +( +CEIUG +); +1 ♀ +, same collection data except +27 Nov.–11 Dec. 2008 +( +CEIUG +); +2 ♂♂ +, +5 ♀♀ +, same collection data except +11 Dec. 2008 +– +6 Jan. 2009 +( +CEIUG +); +1 ♀ +, same collection data except +12 Jan.–2 Feb. 2009 +( +CEIUG +); +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +, +Fujairah +, light trap, +16–24 Feb. 2005 +, A. van Harten leg. ( +CEIUG +); +1 ♀ +, Hatta, +30 Jan.–26 Feb. 2006 +, A. van Harten leg. ( +CEIUG +); +1 ♀ +, Al Ajban, +2–9 Apr. 2006 +, A. van Harten leg. ( +CEIUG +); +1 ♂ +, Waldi Bih dam, +1–15 Mar. 2007 +, A. van Harten leg. ( +CEIUG +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Tajikistan +, +Turkmenistan +. In the Middle East known from +Oman +and the +United Arab Emirates +. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +The coloration of the legs of Middle East specimens of + +Bezzia pachypyga + +is highly variable and different from that in the original description by +Remm (1974) +. However, diagnostic characters of the highly complicated male genitalia match the original descriptions of + +B. pachypyga + +and its junior synonym + +B. omanensis +Boorman & van Harten, 2002 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F87DFFB0FDDA3AB1FB35F821.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87DFFB0FDDA3AB1FB35F821.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..227572ab67d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87DFFB0FDDA3AB1FB35F821.xml @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + + +Bezzia +( +Pygobezzia +) +fuliginata + +Clastrier, 1962 + + + + + + + + + +Bezzia fuliginata +Clastrier, 1962: 115 + + +( +♂ +, +Serbia +). + + + + + +Bezzia fulginata + +– + +Remm 1967: 32 + +( +Azerbaijan +, +Georgia +); 1973: 351 ( +Hungary +). — + +Krzywiński 1995: 182 + +( +♂ +, +Afghanistan +, +Azerbaijan +, +Belgium +, +Georgia +, +Poland +, +Serbia +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Very similar to + +B. albicornis + +, but differs from that species in having a scutellum with 4 large setae; parameres swollen on proximal portion, without lateral ribs, with 2 distinct apical lobes; apex of median process of aedeagus strongly bent and gonocoxite with 3 ventral bristles. + + + + + +Material examined + + + +ISRAEL +: +1 ♂ +, Enot Zukim, +7 Dec. 1992 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +); +1 ♀ +, Park Rosh ha’Ayin, +16 Apr. 1993 +, A. Freidberg and F. Kaplan leg. ( +TAU +); +1 ♂ +, En Mor, +30 Jun. 1994 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +); +1 ♀ +, Enot Samar, +21 Jun. 1998 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +). + + +LEBANON +: +1 ♂ +, Tyre, +33º15.535′ N +, +35 º12.726′ E +, beach, net, +6 May 2012 +, P. Dominiak leg. ( +CEIUG +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Afghanistan +, Azerbaijan, Europe ( +France +, +Hungary +, +Poland +, +Serbia +, +Spain +, +Ukraine +– +Crimea +), Georgia, +Kazakhstan +, +Turkmenistan +, +Tajikistan +and +Uzbekistan +( +Remm 1988 +; +Krzywiński 1995 +; + +Szadziewski +et al. +2013 + +). We provide the first records from the Middle East, from +Israel +and +Lebanon +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F87EFFB0FDD03A50FECAFB6C.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87EFFB0FDD03A50FECAFB6C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b14354cc7ee --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87EFFB0FDD03A50FECAFB6C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,566 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + + + +Bezzia +( +Pygobezzia +) +albicornis + +( +Meigen, 1818 +) + + + + + + + + + +Ceratopogon albicornis +Meigen, 1818: 74 + + +( +♂ +, +Germany +). + + + + + + +Ceratopogon calceatus +Haliday in +Walker, 1856: 239 + + +( +Great Britain +). + + + + + + +Ceratopogon pallidetarsatus +Strobl, 1900: 171 + + +( +♀ +, +Spain +). + + + + + + +Bezzia strobli +Kieffer, 1919: 122 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, +Hungary +). + + + + + + +Bezzia brevinervis +Kieffer, 1919: 122 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, +Hungary +). + + + + + + +Bezzia trilobata +Kieffer, 1922: 237 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, +Germany +). + + + + + + +Bezzia aegyptia +Kieffer, 1925: 264 + + +( +♀ +, +Egypt +– +Suez +). +Syn. nov. + + + + + + +Homobezzia atrata +Macfie, 1944: 126 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, figures, description, +Egypt +). + + + + + + +Bezzia sajana +Remm, 1972: 89 + + +( +♂ +, +Russia +– Siberia). + + + + + + +Bezzia quadridens +Remm, 1972: 89 + + +( +♂ +, +Russia +). + + + + + +Ceratopogon pallidetarsatus + +– + +Becker 1903: 73 + +( +♀ +, +Egypt +). + + + + + +Bezzia albicornis + +– + +Goetghebuer 1922: 58 + +(combination). — + +Szadziewski 1984: 184 + +(= + +C. pallidetarsatus + +). — de + +Meillon & Wirth 1987: 65 + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, +South Africa +; = + +C. pallidetarsatus + +, + +Bezzia strobli + +, + +Bezzia brevinervis + +, + +Homobezzia atrata + +). — + +Boorman & van Harten 2002: 456 + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, +Yemen +). — + + +Szadziewski +et al. +2011: 649 + + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, +United Arab Emirates +). + + + + + +Bezzia atrata + +– + +Clastrier 1962: 112 + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, descriptions, figures, +Algeria +). + + + + + +Bezzia calceata + +– + +Tokunaga 1966: 285 + +( +♂ +, +♀ +, +Afghanistan +). + + + + + +non +Bezzia sajana + +– + +Remm 1974: 441 + +(= + +B. quadridens + +). + + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Entirely blackish brown species, except tarsomeres 1–3 pale. Scutellum with 6 large setae. Fore femur with 2–4 ventral spines. Male genitalia large; gonocoxite very long and slender, gonostylus short, divided into 3–4 tooth-like lobes; aedeagus with slender, very long median process that is nearly straight +on distal portion; parameres fused, expanded on distal portion, with distinct lateral ribs, apex with 2 small processes. Female with 2 ovoid, distinctly unequal seminal capsules. + + + + +Material examined + + + +ISRAEL +: +1 ♀ +, Sadom, +26 May 1976 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +); +2 ♀♀ +, Berekhat Ya’ar, +6 Jun. 2003 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +); +1 ♀ +, Besor Nature Reserve, Tel Sharuhen, +31º17′ N +, +34º29′ E +, +11 May 2005 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +); +1 ♂ +, Herzliya, swamp, +32º10.3′ N +, +34º49.4′ E +, +11 May 2008 +, A. Freidberg leg. ( +TAU +). + + +LEBANON +: +1 ♂ +, Tyre, +33º16.232′ N +, +35 º12.706′ E +, net, +12 May 2012 +, P. Dominiak leg. ( +CEIUG +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Afghanistan +, +Algeria +, +Egypt +, Europe ( +Austria +, +Belgium +, +Croatia +, +Czech Republic +, +France +, +Germany +, +Hungary +, +Lithuania +, +Poland +, +Slovakia +, +Spain +, +Sweden +, +Switzerland +, +Ukraine +, former +Yugoslavia +; + +Szadziewski +et al. +2013 + +), +United Arab Emirates +, +Yemen +, +South Africa +. We provide the first records from +Israel +and +Lebanon +. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +In the Middle East and North Africa, the subgenus + +Pygobezzia + +is represented by two very similar species, + +B. albicornis + +and + +B. fuliginata + +. The original description of + +B. aegyptia + +by +Kieffer (1925) +, based on a single female, is very poor; however, it matches the description of + +B. albicornis + +. Unfortunately, the female +holotype +of + +B. aegyptia + +was probably not saved by Kieffer. Accordingly, we regard + +B. aegyptia + +as a new junior synonym of + +B. albicornis + +, because the latter species is more common in the region and was reported earlier from +Egypt +by +Becker (1903) +as +Ceratoogon pallidetarsata +and by +Macfie (1944) +as + +B. atrata + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/70/37097034F87EFFB3FD983FFDFAF1FBCC.xml b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87EFFB3FD983FFDFAF1FBCC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f347b197660 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/70/37097034F87EFFB3FD983FFDFAF1FBCC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ + + + +Predatory midges of the tribes Palpomyiini and Sphaeromiini (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from the Middle East, with keys and descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Alwin-Kownacka, Alicja +0995CC31-5CC8-46F3-BB72-A4D76919750A +urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 0995 CC 31 - 5 CC 8 - 46 F 3 - BB 72 - A 4 D 76919750 A & Corresponding author: alicja. alwin @ biol. ug. edu. pl +alicja.alwin@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szadziewski, Ryszard +083FF55D-C4C0-4C7D-AE23-562619624664 +Email: ryszard. szadziewski @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 083 FF 55 D-C 4 C 0 - 4 C 7 D-AE 23 - 562619624664 +ryszard.szadziewski@biol.ug.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Szwedo, Jacek +36BAE161-ECCD-4D89-B383-C7CC84FF0A89 +Email: jacek. szwedo @ biol. ug. edu. pl & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 36 BAE 161 - ECCD- 4 D 89 - B 383 - C 7 CC 84 FF 0 A 89 +jacek.szwedo@biol.ug.edu.pl + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2017 + +2017-05-15 + + +318 + + +1 +30 + + + +journal article +22140 +10.5852/ejt.2017.318 +3a1f57d6-6cad-4bb9-8fdd-6b2b471bce0c +2118-9773 +3827451 +541EA4D0-3883-4190-8E10-FF7CAC1BB035 + + + + + +Subgenus + +Pygobezzia +Remm, 1974 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + + + + + +Bezzia strobli +Kieffer, 1919 + +(= + +B. albicornis +Meigen, 1818 + +); by original designation. + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Fore femur with 2–4 ventral spines. Male flagellomere 10 elongate, longer than 11–13; and the flagellar plume is well developed. Aedeagus with slender and very long median process, which is strongly bent dorsally on proximal portion. Gonocoxite slender, elongate; gonostylus reduced, very short, divided into 3–4 tooth-like lobes. + + + + + +Key to males of + +Bezzia +( +Pygobezzia +) + +of the Middle East + + + + + + + +1. Parameres swollen on distal portion, with lateral ribs; scutellum with six large setae ................. .............................................................................................................. + +B. albicornis +( +Meigen, 1818 +) + + + + + +– Parameres swollen on proximal portion, without lateral ribs; scutellum with four large setae ..... ............................................................................................................... + +B. fuliginata +Clastrier, 1962 + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/77/3709779B49EAE167CC0441C4DA5C4457.xml b/data/37/09/77/3709779B49EAE167CC0441C4DA5C4457.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c80314bd50d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/77/3709779B49EAE167CC0441C4DA5C4457.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Platygastroidea + + + +Author + +Buhl, Peter N. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Notton, David G. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +7991 +7991 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7991 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7991 +1314-2828-4-7991 + + + + +Trichacis remulus (Walker, 1835) + + + + +Platygaster remulus +Walker, 1835 + + + +Distribution +England + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/82/37098263D0A70E92A0F31444B2C5AD66.xml b/data/37/09/82/37098263D0A70E92A0F31444B2C5AD66.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e8112bcf959 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/82/37098263D0A70E92A0F31444B2C5AD66.xml @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ + + + +La reserve naturelle integrale du Mt Nimba. XI. Hymenopteres Formicidae. + + + +Author + +Bernard, F. + +text + + +Memoires de l'Institut Francais d'Afrique Noire + + +1953 + +19 + + +165 +270 + + + + +http://research.amnh.org/entomology/social_insects/ants/publications/6391/6391.pdf + +journal article +6391 + + + + +D. (Anomma) funereus Em. + + + +Un [[male]] pris a Ziela, lisiere de la foret. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/87/370987F0FFADFFA3A2F5FD85FDF8FB6B.xml b/data/37/09/87/370987F0FFADFFA3A2F5FD85FDF8FB6B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ae7a7e60ac4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/87/370987F0FFADFFA3A2F5FD85FDF8FB6B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,263 @@ + + + +Two new species in the Russula (Russulaceae, Basidiomycota) crown clade from Indian Himalaya + + + +Author + +Ghosh, Aniket +Department of Botany & Microbiology, H. N. B. Garhwal University, Srinagar, Garhwal - 246174, India. +ghosh.aniket87@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Das, Kanad +Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, P. O. - Botanic Garden, Howrah - 711103, India. +daskanadbsi@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Buyck, Bart +Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles CP 39, 57 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France. +buyck@mnhn.fr + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2021 + +2021-12-16 + + +782 + + +157 +172 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.782.1595 + +journal article +2919 +10.5852/ejt.2021.782.1595 +dbd9ecfc-2df9-4cd2-9064-839a26e49f92 +2118-9773 +5787334 + + + + + + +Russula adwanitekae +A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck + +sp. nov. + + + + + +Figs 2–3 + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + + +Russula adwanitekae + +sp. nov. +is mainly separated from similarly looking species with reddish lilac, orchid purple or greyish to deep magenta colored pileus in subsect. +Laricinae +by its sequence data (nrITS) and geographic distribution. + + + + + +Etymology + + +After the name of the forest locality, Adwani-Teka. + + + + +Material examined + + + + + +Holotype + +INDIA +• +Uttarakhand +, +Pauri Garhwal +, +Adwani-Teka forest +; +30°05.681′ N +, +78°43.890′ E +; alt. + +1989 m +a.s.l. + +; +in temperate mixed forest +; + +3 Oct. 2016 + +; + +A +. +Ghosh + +, +AG 16-1430 +; GenBank: +MN263242 +(ITS); +CAL[1821] +. + + + + + +Paratype + +INDIA +• +Uttarakhand +, +Pauri Garhwal +, +Adwani-Teka forest +; +30°05.675′ N +, +78°43.880′ E +; alt. + +1953 m +a.s.l. + +; +in temperate mixed forest +; + +5 Oct. 2016 + +, + +A +. +Ghosh + +, +AG 16-1435 +; GenBank: +MN263243 +(ITS); +CAL[1822] + +. + + +MycoBank +: +MB +838571; +Index Fungorum number +: IF558126; +Facesoffungi number +: FoF 09581 + + + + + +Description + + + +Pileus small to medium-sized, +36–53 mm +diam., convex when young, becoming plano-convex, applanate to uplifted with maturity, broadly depressed centre, near the margin becoming tuberculately striate and more or less straight with age, entire; pileipellis peeling to mid-radius; surface dry, shiny and viscid when moist, glabrous, reddish lilac (14C3–5), orchid purple (14C8) or greyish magenta (14D5–7) to deep magenta (14D8) and centrally dark magenta (13–14F4–8). Pileus context firm, brittle, yellowish white (1–2A2), unchanging after bruising, on exposure or with age. Lamellae adnexed to subdecurrent, equal but mixed with some dispersed lamellulae of different length, close (10–12/cm at pileus margin), cream to pale yellow or light yellow (4A2–4), up to +6 mm +broad, occasionally forked near the stipe apex; lamella edge even and concolorous. Stipe 35–51 × +7–14 mm +, cylindrical to subclavate, tapered at the apex, central, solid but not firm; surface dry, finely longitudinally venose, chalky white (1–2A1) but with yellowish white to pale yellow (4A2–3) flush near its middle portion, changing greyish white (1–2B1) after bruising. Stipe context solid, chalky white (1–2A1), changing dirty white or greyish white (1–2B1) after bruising or on exposure; turning reddish brown (8E7–8) to dark brown (8F7–8) with application of guaiacol. Odour indistinctive. Taste mild. Spore print not obtained. + + + +Fig. 2. + +Russula adwanitekae +A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck + +sp. nov. +(from holotype, +AG 16-1430 +). +A–C. +Fresh and dissected basidiomata in the field and basecamp. +D. +Transverse section through pileipellis showing elements. +E–H. +Transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial cystidia near the lamellae sides and basidia. +I. +SEM images of basidiospores. Scale bars: D–H = 10 μm; I = 2 μm. + + + + +Fig. 3. + +Russula adwanitekae +A.Ghosh, K.Das & Buyck + +sp. nov. +(from holotype, +AG 16-1430 +). +A. +Basidiospores. +B. +Elements of pileipellis: hyphal terminations and pileocystidia. +C. +Hymenial cystidia near the lamellae sides. +D. +Hymenial cystidia near the lamellae edges. +E. +Basidia. Scale bars: A = 2 μm; B–E = 10 μm. + + +Basidiospores subglobose to broadly ellipsoid, rarely ellipsoid, (7–)7.73–8.23–8.72(–9.5) × (6–)6.6– 6.93–7.3(–8) μm, Q = (1.07–)1.13–1.19–1.25(–1.33), ornamentation amyloid (up to 1.7 µm high), consisting of thick ridges and warts forming incomplete reticulum, with some isolated intermediate warts; suprahilar plage amyloid; apiculi up to 2 µm high. Basidia (29–)32–35–38(–40) × (10–)10–11–13 (–15) µm, 4-spored, subclavate to clavate; sterigmata up to 8 µm long. Subhymenium layer up to 37 µm thick, pseudoparenchymatous. Hymenial cystidia on lamellar sides (55–)61.5–71.5–81(–92) × (7–)8– 9.5–10.5(–11) µm, cylindrical, subclavate to fusiform with frequent lageniform (up to 23 µm long) or appendiculate or few rounded-obtuse apices, emergent up to 32 µm beyond the basidiole tips; contents crystalline, without reaction in sulfovanillin. Lamellae edges fertile with basidia and cystidia. Hymenial cystidia on lamellar edges (37–)42.5–52.5–62.5(–66) × (6–)6–7–8(–9) µm, cylindrical to subclavate with lageniform (up to 20 µm long) or appendiculate or rounded apex; contents crystalline, without reaction in sulfovanillin. Hymenophoral trama mainly composed of large nests of sphaerocytes and few hyphal elements. Pileipellis orthochromatic in Cresyl Blue, sharply delimited from the underlying sphaerocytes of the context, 100–120 μm thick, two-layered, distinctly divided in 40–50 μm deep suprapellis composed of erect or ascending hyphal terminations, arranged in a trichodermal structure and dispersed pileocystidia, and subpellis 60–70 μm deep, composed of more or less dense, horizontally oriented hyphae.Acid-resistant incrustations absent. Hyphal terminations near the pileus margin usually branched at the subterminal cells or the cells just below, thin-walled; terminal cells (11–)19–28.5–37.5(–50) × 3–4–4.5(–6) μm, mainly subulate, sometimes cylindrical to subcylindrical, apically obtuse or slightly narrowed towards tips and wider near base or sometimes attenuated; subterminal cells usually equal in size, sometimes with lateral branches; near the pileus centre with slightly shorter and less wide terminal cells, measuring (15–)18.5–25–32(–44) × (2–)2.5–3–3.5(–4) μm, but equally wide subterminal cells. Pileocystidia near the pileus margin 1–4-celled, cylindrical, usually originating deep in subpellis and often originating from branched subterminal cells, thin-walled; terminal cells (23–)40.5–62–83(–110) × (4–)4.5–5–6(–7) μm, cylindrical or sometimes slightly tapered towards tips, rounded-obtuse apex, without any incrustations; contents crystalline, without reaction in sulfovanillin; those near the pileus centre with 0–3 septa and shorter terminal cells (15–)25.5–38–51(–70) × (3.5–)4–5–5.5(–7) μm. Clamp connections absent from all tissues. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/87/370987F0FFAEFFAFA28EFAA4FD5FFE02.xml b/data/37/09/87/370987F0FFAEFFAFA28EFAA4FD5FFE02.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..201e2e65ea5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/87/370987F0FFAEFFAFA28EFAA4FD5FFE02.xml @@ -0,0 +1,302 @@ + + + +Two new species in the Russula (Russulaceae, Basidiomycota) crown clade from Indian Himalaya + + + +Author + +Ghosh, Aniket +Department of Botany & Microbiology, H. N. B. Garhwal University, Srinagar, Garhwal - 246174, India. +ghosh.aniket87@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Das, Kanad +Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, P. O. - Botanic Garden, Howrah - 711103, India. +daskanadbsi@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Buyck, Bart +Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles CP 39, 57 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France. +buyck@mnhn.fr + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2021 + +2021-12-16 + + +782 + + +157 +172 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.782.1595 + +journal article +2919 +10.5852/ejt.2021.782.1595 +dbd9ecfc-2df9-4cd2-9064-839a26e49f92 +2118-9773 +5787334 + + + + + + +Russula purpureozonata +K.Das, A.Ghosh & Buyck + +sp. nov. + + + + + +Figs 4–5 + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + + +Russula purpureozonata + +sp. nov. +is a blackening species with a dark purplish concentric zonation on the pileus surface and otherwise typical features of subsect. +Decolorantes +; it differs from the microscopically similar, North American + +R +. +burkei +Burl. + +in its mild taste and ectomycorrhizal association with + +Abies densa + +, and from North American + +R +. +californiensis + +and + +R +. +magna + +in its distinctly smaller spores. + + + + + +Etymology + + +Refers to the dark purplish concentric zones on the pileus surface. + + + + +Material examined + + + + + +Holotype + +INDIA +• +Sikkim +, +East district +, +Memeinchu +; +27°21.108′ N +, +88°49.660′ E +; alt. + +3539 m +a.s.l. + +; + +on the soil under + +Abies densa + + +; + +2 Aug. 2018 + +; + +K +. +Das + +, +KD +18-003; GenBank: +MN267570 +(ITS); +CAL[1817] +. + + + +Additional material + + + +INDIA +• +Sikkim +, +East district +, +opposite to Gnathang firing range forest +; +27°18.605′ N +, +88°48.794′ E +; alt. + +3885 m +a.s.l. + +; + +on the soil under + +Abies densa + + +; + +5 Aug. 2018 + +; + +K +. +Das + +, +KD +18-15 (CAL 1818); GenBank: +MN269951 +(ITS); +CAL[1818] + +. + + + +Fig. 4. + +Russula purpureozonata +K.Das, A.Ghosh & Buyck + +sp. nov. +(from holotype, +KD 18-003 +). +A–B. +Fresh and dissected basidiomata in the field and basecamp. +C–D. +Transverse section through pileipellis showing elements. +E. +Transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial cystidia near the lamellae sides. +F. +Transverse section through lamellae showing hymenial cystidia near the lamellae edges (indicated with white arrow). +G. +SEM images of basidiospores. Scale bars: C = 100 μm; D–E = 10 μm; F = 50 μm; G = 2 μm. + + + + +Fig. 5. + +Russula purpureozonata +K.Das, A.Ghosh & Buyck + +sp. nov. +(from holotype, +KD 18-003 +). +A. +Basidiospores. +B. +Basidia. +C. +Hymenial cystidia near the lamellae sides. +D. +Elements of the pileipellis near the pileus centre: hyphal terminations and pileocystidia. +E. +Elements of the pileipellis near the pileus margin: hyphal terminations and pileocystidia. Scale bars: A = 5 μm; B–E = 10 μm. + + + +MycoBank +: +MB +838572; +Index Fungorum number +: IF558127; +Facesoffungi number +: FoF 09580 + + + + + +Description + + + +Pileus large-sized, +85–105 mm +diam., hemispherical when young, then convex, plano-convex to applanate, broadly but shallowly depressed in the centre when mature; margin decurved to plane with maturity, entire; surface viscid when moist, then dry, finely areolate, peeling to ½ of the radius, greyish yellow (2C3–4) or olive to linden green (2D5–6), centrally dark brown (7F4–5) to dark purple or purple-black with pastel yellow to light yellow patches (3A4–5), fading towards mid in distinctive concentric zones. Pileus context up to +8 mm +thick, thinning towards margin, firm, brittle, chalky white (1–2A2), changing first orange-red, then black when cut or bruised; turning greyish red to reddish brown (8C–D5) and dull green (26E3–4) with guaiacol and FeSO +4 +, respectively. Lamellae adnexed to free, subdistant (6–7/cm at pileus margin), yellowish white (2–3A2), forked near the stipe apex; edge even and concolorous. Stipe 70–100 × +20–30 mm +, subclavate to clavate, tapered at the apex, central, solid; surface dry, finely longitudinally venose, chalky white (1–2A1) with yellowish white to pale yellow (4A2–3) flush at one side of the centre, changing first orange-red, then black when cut or bruised. Stipe context solid, chalky white (1–2A1), changing first orange-red, then black when cut or bruised; turning greyish red to reddish brown (8C–D5) and dull green (26E3–4) with guaiacol and FeSO +4 +, respectively. Odour indistinctive. Taste mild. Spore print yellowish white (3A2). + +Basidiospores globose, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid, (7.4–)7.6–8.02–8.4(–8.9) × (6.5–)6.8–7.2–7.7 (–8) μm, Q = (1.04–)1.07–1.11–1.15(–1.23), ornamentation amyloid, composed of somewhat cylindric (mostly with rounded or obtuse apices) isolated very small (0.3 μm) to high (up to 1.2 μm) spines and most of spines fused laterally and connected by thin to thick ridges (like small crests) forming partial reticulum; suprahilar plage amyloid; apiculi up to 2 μm high. Basidia (35–)41–49–57(–68) × 10–11–12(–14) μm, 4-spored, subclavate to clavate. Subhymenium layer 20–25 μm thick, made up of pseudoparenchymatous cells. Hymenial cystidia on lamellar sides (63–)71.5–86–101(–134) × (9–) 9.5–11–12.5(–14) μm, subcylindrical, cylindrical to ventricose with capitate, mucronate, moniliform or appendiculate (up to 7 μm long appendage) apex, emergent up to 55 μm beyond the basidiole tips; contents dense, heteromorphous and partly or completely filled with fibrous to somewhat crystalloid components, hardly staining in sulfovanillin. Lamellae edges fertile with frequent basidia. Hymenial cystidia on lamellar edges (72–)75–84–92.5(–98) × (9–)9.6–10.5–11.5(–12) μm, subcylindrical, cylindrical to ventricose with obtuse-rounded, capitate, mucronate or appendiculate apex; contents dense, heteromorphous and partly or completely filled with fibrous to somewhat crystalloid components, hardly staining in sulfovanillin. Hymenophoral trama composed of numerous sphaerocytes and connecting hyphae; sphaerocytes globose to elliptical. Pileipellis orthochromatic in Cresyl Blue, sharply delimited from the underlying sphaerocytes of the context, 120–180 μm thick, two-layered, distinctly divided in 50–80 μm deep suprapellis composed of erect or ascending hyphal terminations, arranged in a densely turf of trichodermal structure and dispersed pileocystidia, and subpellis 70–100 μm deep, composed of more or less horizontally irregularly oriented, moderately dense, 2.5–3.5 μm wide pilear hyphae. Acid-resistant incrustations absent. Hyphal terminations near the pileus margin usually branched at the subterminal cells or the cells just below, occasionally slightly flexuous, thin-walled; terminal cells (13–)15.5–24.5–34(–53) × 3–3.5–4.5(–5) μm, mainly subulate to tapering towards tips or cylindrical to subcylindrical, apically obtuse or slightly narrowed towards tips and wider near base; subterminal cells usually equal in size, rarely with lateral branches or nodulose, equally wide or more or slightly wider. Hyphal terminations near the pileus centre with shorter but slightly wider terminal cells measuring (9–)17–22.5–28.5(–35) × (2.5–)3–4–4.5(–6) μm, mainly tapering to subulate towards tips or cylindrical or ventricose or occasionally lageniform, apically obtuse or slightly narrowed towards tips and wider near base; subterminal cells equally wide, sometimes slightly wider or ventricose, rarely with nodulose or with lateral branches. Pileocystidia near the pileus margin 1–4-celled, numerous, cylindrical, usually originating deep in subpellis and often originating from branched subterminal cells, thin-walled; terminal cells (30–)32.5–52–71(–108) × (4–)4.5–5–6(–6.5) μm, cylindrical or sometimes slightly tapered towards tips, rounded-obtuse, without any incrustations; contents heteromorphous-crystalline, without reaction in sulfovanillin. Pileocystidia near the pileus centre with often more septa (1–7); terminal cells (14–) 22.5–38–54(–73) × (4–)4.5–5–6(–7) μm, cylindrical or slightly tapered towards tips, rounded-obtuse apex. Clamp connections absent from all tissues. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/90/37099005AC98AACBD74DC664A6C41B2B.xml b/data/37/09/90/37099005AC98AACBD74DC664A6C41B2B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ecf81814b61 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/90/37099005AC98AACBD74DC664A6C41B2B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Cerambyx rusticus +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + +C. thorace mutico subrotundo nudo, corpore lurido, antennis brevioribus subulatis. + +Fn. svec. +492. Cerambyx fuscus, punctis thoracinis impressis. + + + + +Habitat in +Europa. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/BA/3709BA19E0DC80E24782FFEC3C00B72E.xml b/data/37/09/BA/3709BA19E0DC80E24782FFEC3C00B72E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b327ed7fb5f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/BA/3709BA19E0DC80E24782FFEC3C00B72E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ + + + +Further studies on the Pselaphodes complex of genera from China (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae) + + + +Author + +Yin, Zi-Wei + + + +Author + +Hlavac, Peter + + + +Author + +Li, Li-Zhen + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +275 + + +23 +65 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.275.4571 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.275.4571 +1313-2970-275-23 + + + + + +Pselaphodes monoceros Yin & +Hlavac + +sp. n. +Figs 22B24 + + + +Type material +(5 ♂♂, 1 ♀). Holotype: ♂, labeled 'China: Xizang Prov. / Cuona County / Lexiang, alt. 2500 m / 16.vii.2012, Ye Liu leg.' (SNUC); Paratypes: 4 ♂♂, 1 ♀, same label data as holotype type (SNUC). + + + +Diagnosis +. + + +Reddish brown; length 2.91-3.03; clypeus projected anteriorly, forming a horn-like process in male; postgenae elongate, rounded laterally; antennomeres +IX-XI +enlarged; pronotum rounded at anterolateral margins; male with greatly elongate metaventral processes; metacoxae simple; aedeagus with symmetric median lobe. + + + +Description. + +Male (Fig. 22B). Length 2.91-3.00. Head slightly longer than wide, HL 0.58-0.59, HW 0.56-0.58; clypeus projecting anteriorly (Fig. 24B); maxillary palpi (Fig. 24C) with segments III indistinctly projected laterally; eyes each composed of about 40 facets. Antennal clubs as in Fig. 24A. Pronotum (Fig. 24D) slightly longer than wide, PL 0.58-0.61, PW 0.55-0.59, rounded at anterolateral margins. Elytra wider than long, EL 0.89-0.90, EW 1.16-1.17. Metaventral processes greatly elongate, apically narrowed (Fig. 24E). Protrochantersand profemora spinose ventrally (Fig. 24F), protibiae with small apical spur (Fig. 24G); mesotrochanters spinose ventrally, mesofemora simple (Fig. 24H), mesotibiae with +small +apical spine (Fig. 24I); metatrochanters and metafemora simple (Fig. 24J). Abdomen broad at base and narrowed apically, AL 0.86-0.90, AW 1.16-1.19. Sternite IX as in Fig. 24K. Aedeagus length 0.56, with symmetric median lobe (Figs 24 +L-N +). + +Female. Similar to male in general; BL 3.03, HL 0.62, HW 0.57, PL 0.62, PW 0.60, EL 0.7, EW 1.19, AL 1.06, AW 1.28. Eyes each composed of about 20 facets. Antennae unmodified; metaventral processes absent. + + + +Comparative +notes. + + +This unusual +Pselaphodes +species has simple maxillary palpomeres II and IV, with palpomeres III only slightly projecting laterally on the anterolateral margins. This form of maxillary palpi together with the modified clypeus in the male is not known in any other species of the +Pselaphodes +complex of genera. These two characters, in combination with the form of the antennal clubs, and the greatly elongate metaventral processes readily separate the new species from all other congeners of the genus. The generic limit of +Pselaphodes +is expanded based on this species. The form of maxillary palpi seems to be occasionally variable within genus (also see comments on +Labomimus simplicipalpus +above). An extensive species-level phylogenetic analysis is needed for the determination of the taxonomic placements of these atypical species. + + + + +Distribution +. + +Southwest China: Xizang (= Tibet). + + +Biology. +Adults were collected by beating a pile of mixed live and dead branches in a forest. + + +Etymology. + +The Latin word +'monoceros' +means 'a +unicorn' +, referring to the unique protuberance on the clypeus in the male. + + + +Figure 24. Diagnostic features of +Pselaphodes monoceros +in male. A antenna B head, in lateral view C maxillary palpus D pronotum E median metaventral process, in lateral view F protrochanter and profemur G apical portion of protibia H mesotrochanter and mesofemur I apical portion of mesotibia J metatrochanter and metafemur K sternite IX L aedeagus, in dorsal view M same, in lateral view N same, in ventral view. Scales (mm): A, B, D, F, H, J = 0.3; E, L, M, N = 0.2; C = 0.1; G, I, K = 0.05. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/09/FE/3709FE8B678E188292728ACAA9BF1153.xml b/data/37/09/FE/3709FE8B678E188292728ACAA9BF1153.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7b9e7d95038 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/09/FE/3709FE8B678E188292728ACAA9BF1153.xml @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ + + + +The identity of Pseudomystus moeschii (Boulenger, 1890), with the description of two new species of bagrid catfishes from Southeast Asia (Teleostei: Bagridae). + + + +Author + +Heok Hee Ng + + + +Author + +Kelvin K. P. Lim + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2005 + +851 + + +1 +18 + + + + +http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:02BCB677-51EC-45E2-9323-F8EF59D32B7A + +journal article +z00851p001 + + + + +P. fuscus +: + + + + + +RMNH +7555, +holotype +, 39.6 mm SL; +Borneo +: upper Mahakam. + + +ZRC +46144 (18) 34.0-42.6 mm SL; +Borneo: Sarawak +, Sungai Sebiris, 13.8 km after Kg. Pueh turnoff towards Lundu on Sematan-Lundu road, +1°41'32.0"N +109°47'0.8"E +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0B/1C/370B1C32E1641A0B5FFE0A9BB3623349.xml b/data/37/0B/1C/370B1C32E1641A0B5FFE0A9BB3623349.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a3f250cca46 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0B/1C/370B1C32E1641A0B5FFE0A9BB3623349.xml @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ + + + +Taxonomic revision of Afrotropical Laccophilus Leach, 1815 (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) + + + +Author + +Bistroem, Olof + + + +Author + +Nilsson, Anders N. + + + +Author + +Bergsten, Johannes + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +542 + + +1 +379 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.542.5975 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.542.5975 +1313-2970-542-1 +026407877355425BAB10BF1674510F12 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Coleoptera Dytiscidae + + + +Laccophilus garambanus Guignot, 1958 +Figs 200-201, 370, 522, 576 + + + + + +Laccophilus +garambanus + +Guignot 1958 +: 7 (original description, faunistics); +Nilsson 2001 +: 244 (catalogue, faunistics); +Nilsson 2015 +: 212 (catalogue, faunistics). + + + +Type locality. +Zaire: Parc National Garamba. + + +Type material studied + +(7 exs.). Holotype: male: "Holotypus / Congo Belge, P.N.G. Miss. H. De Saeger II/gd/14s, 4-VIII-1951 +Rec +. H. De Saeger, 2209 / Coll. Mus. Congo (ex. coll. I.P.N.C.B.) / Guignot det., 1957 +Laccophilus garambanus +sp. n." (MRAC; immature specimen). - Paratype: male and female: "Congo Belge, P.N.G. Miss. H. De Saeger II/gc/10, 28-VIII-52 H. De Saeger. 3987 / Paratype / F. Guignot det., 1959 +Laccophilus garambanus +sp. n." (1 ex. IRSNB; habitus in Fig. 522); same data, but "II/gd/11, 24-VI-1952, 3963" (1 ex. IRSNB); same data, but "II/fd/14, 23-VIII-52, 3966 / F. Guignot det., 1958 +Laccophilus inornatus garambanus +Guignot, paratype" (1 ex. IRSNB); same data, but "II/fd/12, 10-III-1952, 3180" (3 exs. IRSNB); same data, but "II/gd/10, 14-IX-1952, 4099" (1 ex. IRSNB). + + + +Additional material studied + +(11 exs.). Zaire: "PNG II/fd/12, 10.3. 1952, 3180" (1 ex. MRAC); "P.N.G. II/gd/10, 14-IX-52, 4099" (3 exs. IRSNB); "Tshuapa, Mbandaka ca. +0.03N +- +18.28E +, 1964 Stam" (2 exs. RMNH); "Tshuapa, Mbandaka ca. +0.03N +- +18.28E +, 3-4.4. 1964 Stam" (1 ex. RMNH); "Thsuapa-Mbandaka ca. +0.03N +- +18.28E +, a.l. 1964 Stam (1 ex. RMNH); "Quqilhatville 3-4.4. 1963 Stam 3-4.4. 1963 / at light (2 exs. RMNH); "Quqilhatville 20-21.1. 1962 Stam 3-4.4. 1962 / at light (1 ex. MZH). + + + +Specimen with uncertain determination. + +Cameroon: +"Ngoundere +27.7. 1969" (1 female ex. NHMB). + + + +Diagnosis. + +Laccophilus garambanus +is characterized by distinct, although somewhat variable, elytral colour pattern. It is distinguished from other species in this species group by the appearance of male genitalia (penis is quite robust, short, apical external outline almost straight), besides characteristic, elytral colour pattern. + + + +Description. +Body length 2.9-3.2 mm, width 1.6-1.8 mm. Elytral colour pattern variable (Fig. 522); subbasal, pale markings sometimes confluent and form a transverse pale marking. Preapical pale spots also variable in size; often confluent. +Head: Pale ferrugineous, partly often slightly darker but lacks clearly delimited, dark area. Submat, finely microsculptured; reticulation simple and dense. At eyes, finely and irregularly punctate. +Pronotum: Pale ferrugineous, medially with large area slightly darker; ferrugineous (delimitation of area generally vague). Submat to rather shiny, finely microsculptured; reticulation fine and dense; indistinct traces of double reticulation discernible. When discernible large meshes contain 3-6 small meshes. Almost impunctate. +Elytra: Dark ferrugineous to blackish ferrugineous, with variable, ferrugineous to pale ferrugineous markings (Fig. 522). One female (uncertain determination) has slightly paler elytra. Submat, rather shiny, finely microsculptured; reticulation fine, rather distinct. Double reticulation indistinct and fragmentary. Longitudinal areas with fine, rather indistinct and irregular punctures. Lateral, pre-apical furrow shallow, finely pubescent. +Ventral aspect: Pale ferrugineous to ferrugineous, abdomen slightly darker in comparison with rest of ventral aspect. Submat to rather shiny, extensively with very fine microsculpture. Almost impunctate. Stridulatory apparatus fine but clearly discernible; consisting of about 25 narrow but quite long ridges. Apex of prosternal process slender, somewhat extended and pointed. Apical ventrite as in Fig. 200. Transversely located, shallow furrows on metacoxal plates fine (discernible in anterior half). Basal ventrites with fine, distinctly reduced, curved striae. +Legs: Pro- and mesotarsus slightly enlarged, with fine suckers. +Male genitalia: Penis quite robust, short, apical external outline almost straight; extreme external apex broadly rounded (Fig. 370). +Female: Apical ventrite simple (Fig. 201). Pro- and mesotarsus slender. + + +Distribution. +Zaire (Fig. 576). Uncertain record from Cameroon. + + +Collecting circumstances. +Almost unknown. Sampled at light collection. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0B/37/370B3727B0FD38F0F7237BF0755E17EC.xml b/data/37/0B/37/370B3727B0FD38F0F7237BF0755E17EC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..18dc5fc44d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0B/37/370B3727B0FD38F0F7237BF0755E17EC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part D) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +474 +489 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Durio zibethinus +Linnaeus + +, + +Systema Vegetabilium +, ed. 13 + +: 581. 1774 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in India orientali." RCN: 5732. + + +Type not designated. + + +Original material: [icon] in Rumphius, Herb. Amboin. 1: 99, t. 29. 1741. + + + +Current name: + + +Durio zibethinus + +L. + +( +Bombacaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0B/9A/370B9A4E36276E28F47EFA44D249680B.xml b/data/37/0B/9A/370B9A4E36276E28F47EFA44D249680B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d353f79749e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0B/9A/370B9A4E36276E28F47EFA44D249680B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ + + + +The Ciidae (Coleoptera) of New Brunswick, Canada: New records and new synonyms + + + +Author + +Lopes-Andrade, Cristiano + + + +Author + +Webster, Reginald P. + + + +Author + +Webster, Vincent L. + + + +Author + +Alderson, Chantelle A. + + + +Author + +Hughes, Cory C. + + + +Author + +Sweeney, Jon D. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +573 + + +339 +366 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.573.7445 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.573.7445 +1313-2970-573-339 +949649B0D53F4291B6A835D13E70A2AC +949649B0D53F4291B6A835D13E70A2AC + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Coleoptera Ciidae + + + +Ceracis singularis (Dury, 1917) +new to New Brunswick +Fig. 1 + + + +Material examined. + +New Brunswick, Gloucester Co., Bathurst, Daly Point Nature Preserve, +47.6392°N +, +65.6098°W +, 15-25.VI.2015, 9-23.VII.2015, C. Alderson & V. Webster // Mixed forest, green Lindgren funnel trap 1 m high (1), black Lindgren funnel trap 1 m high (1) (2, RWC). Kent Co., Kouchibouguac National Park, +46.8087°N +, +64.9078°W +, 24.VI-7.VII.2015, 7-22.VII.2015, C. Alderson & V. Webster // Poplar/red maple stand, Lindgren funnel trap, 1 m high (1, AFC; 1, RWC). Queens Co., Cranberry Lake P.N.A. [Protected Natural Area], +46.1125°N +, +65.6075°W +, 12-29.VI.2012, R. Webster & M.-A. +Giguere +// Red oak forest, Lindgren funnel trap (1, RWC). Sunbury Co., Gilbert Island, +45.8770°N +, +66.2954°W +, 12-29.VI.2013, C. Alderson, C. Hughes, & V. Webster // Hardwood forest, Lindgren funnel trap 1 m high under +Tilia americana +(1, RWC); Sunpoke Lake, +45.7656°N +, +66.5550°W +, 18.VI-9.VII.2012, C. Alderson & V. Webster // Red oak forest near seasonally flooded marsh, Lindgren funnel trap 1 m high under +Quercus rubra +(1, RWC). York Co., 15 km W of Tracy off Rt. 645, +45.6848°N +, +66.8821°W +, 20-29.VII.2009, R. Webster & M.-A. +Giguere +// Red pine forest, Lindgren funnel trap (1, RWC); same locality data and forest type but 20.VI-6.VII.2011, M. Roy & V. Webster // Flight intercept trap (1, RWC); Keswick Ridge, +45.9962°N +, +66.8781°W +, 19.VI-3.VII.2014, C. Alderson & V. Webster // Mixed forest, Lindgren funnel trap 1 m high under trees (1, RWC) + + + +Distribution in Canada and Alaska. + +ON, QC, NB ( +Bousquet et al. 2013 +). All new records of +Ceracis singularis +(Dury) in NB were based on specimens captured in Lindgren funnel traps or a flight intercept trap. This species is widespread in the province (seven localities) but was captured in low numbers at each site. This species was found in hardwood, mixed, and pine forests. These are the first records of this species from the Maritime Provinces of Canada. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0B/9C/370B9C868EF895E9C7E8757D558CFE97.xml b/data/37/0B/9C/370B9C868EF895E9C7E8757D558CFE97.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2d8d76f477d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0B/9C/370B9C868EF895E9C7E8757D558CFE97.xml @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Phalangium +[ +gen. nov. +] + + + + +Pedes +VIII. + + +Oculi +verticis duo contigui, duo laterales. + + +Frons +antennis pediformibus. + + +Abdomen +rotundatum, muticum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0C/26/370C2634C7B466D4820A80D385127DD3.xml b/data/37/0C/26/370C2634C7B466D4820A80D385127DD3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..00edee0ada4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0C/26/370C2634C7B466D4820A80D385127DD3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Evanioidea + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1116 +1116 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1116 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1116 +1314-2828-2-1116 + + + + +Brachygaster minutus (Olivier, 1792) + + + + +Evania minuta +Olivier, 1792 + + +Evania fulvipes +(Curtis, 1829, +Evania +) + + +Brachygaster rufipes +Brulle +, 1846 preocc. + + +Evania brullei +(Westwood, 1851, +Evania +) + + +Brachygaster schlettereri +Kieffer, 1912 + + + +Distribution +England. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0C/A7/370CA7D47F04E0003DE7D49CF90C9FA4.xml b/data/37/0C/A7/370CA7D47F04E0003DE7D49CF90C9FA4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..04375ae8ed4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0C/A7/370CA7D47F04E0003DE7D49CF90C9FA4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Ophion pteridis Kriechbaumer, 1879 + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0D/26/370D2666A6F810B1DE9A468A3A953376.xml b/data/37/0D/26/370D2666A6F810B1DE9A468A3A953376.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e2dab42cfe9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0D/26/370D2666A6F810B1DE9A468A3A953376.xml @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part P) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +718 +782 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Periploca indica +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +1 + +:211. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Zeylona." RCN: 1751. + + + + +Lectotype +(Huber in Abeywickrama, +Revised Handb. Fl. Ceylon +1(1): 30. 1973): Herb. Hermann 3: 51, No. 113 (BM-000621992) + +. + + + + +Current name: + +Hemidesmus indicus +(L.) Sm. + +( +Asclepiadaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0D/6F/370D6FD38534523121C695F54D739A46.xml b/data/37/0D/6F/370D6FD38534523121C695F54D739A46.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0e932eec78e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0D/6F/370D6FD38534523121C695F54D739A46.xml @@ -0,0 +1,195 @@ + + + +A taxonomic revision of the subfamily Tillinae Leach sensu lato (Coleoptera, Cleridae) in the New World + + + +Author + +Burke, Alan + + + +Author + +Zolnerowich, Gregory + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +179 + + +75 +157 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.179.21253 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.179.21253 +1313-2970-179-75 +36C4E2C8E07D4CC9A1D696B0FCE92CCF +36C4E2C8E07D4CC9A1D696B0FCE92CCF + + + + +Bogcia disjuncta Barr, 1978 +Figs 1F, 2A, 7A, 8C, 16 +E-F +, 18 +D-E + + + + +Synonyms +. + + +Bogcia oaxacae +Barr, 1978, syn. n. Taxonomy of the New World Clerid Genus +Bogcia +from Mexico, The Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 54: 287-291. + + + +Paratypes. +One male and one female examined. + + + +Type +locality. + + +Mazatlan +, Sinaloa, Mexico. Type depository: California Academy of Science (CASC). + + + +Distribution. +Mexico: Chiapas, Guerrero, Jalisco, Nayarit, Oaxaca, Sinaloa; Central America: Nicaragua* + + +Differential diagnosis. + +Bogcia disjuncta +(Figs 1F, 2A) most closely resembles +Cymatodera bogcioides +Burke (Fig. 4F). The two species can be readily distinguished based +on +differences in the structure of the protarsal claw and the antennae. +Bogcia disjuncta +has the protarsal denticle in close proximity to the protarsal claw (Fig. 7A) and the antennae is strongly serrate (Fig. 8C). +Cymatodera bogcioides +has the protarsal claw conspicuously separated from the protarsal denticle (Fig. 7B) and the antennae is moderately serrate. + + + +Figure 2. Habitus of: A +Bogcia oaxacae +syn. n. B +Neocallotillus elegans +(black morph) C +Neocallotillus elegans +(bi-colored morph) D +Callotillus bahamensis +E +Callotillus eburneocinctus +F +Neocallotillus intricatus +. + + + + +Redescription. +Male. Form: Rather robust, moderately wider posteriorly, elongate. Color: Head, antennae, mouthparts, thorax legs, elytra and abdomen testaceous to brown; posterior half of mandibles black 2-3 irregularly fuscous. Each elytron with a broad, black to brown oblique fascia located behind median region of elytron with varying degrees of extension, ranging from the epipleural fold to the elytral suture, to two reduced, dark maculae, this fascia is preceded by a narrow, pale region; in addition to the dark fascia there is one small, brown to black humeral macula, this spot is absent in some specimens examined (Figs 1F, 2A). + +Head: Measured across eyes wider than pronotum; surface rugose; frons feebly bi-impressed; coarsely punctate; eyes medium-sized, somewhat rounded, inconspicuously longer than wide, emarginate in front, bulging laterally, separated by approximately 2.5 eye-widths; antennomeres 2-3 very slightly serrate; third antennomere about 2 +x +the length of second antennomere; fourth antennomere as long as third antennomere; antennomeres 4-10 strongly serrate, about the same length, as broad as long, posterior distal angle sharply pointed; eleventh antennomere about the same length as the tenth antennomere, with its distal margin moderately oblique (Fig. 8C). + +Thorax: Pronotum rugose; widest behind middle; middle slightly wider than front margin; sides constricted subapically, more strongly constricted behind middle; disc flat, impressed in front of middle; subbasal tumescence somewhat pronounced. Prosternum smooth, slightly to moderately punctate. Mesoventrite rugulose, feebly to coarsely punctate. Scutellum subquadrate; wider than long; notched medially. +Legs: Femora shiny; finely transversally rugulose; indistinctly punctate. Tibiae coarsely, densely punctate; longitudinally rugose; clothed with long, erect setae and some short, recumbent setae. + +Elytra: Anterior margin bisinuate, wider than pronotum; disc smooth, flattened above; humeri indicated; sides subparallel, widest behind middle; apices weakly dehiscent, triangular, covering sixth tergite; elytral declivity somewhat procurved, females slightly wider than males; sculpturing consisting of coarse punctations arranged in striae that gradually reduce in size behind middle; interstices smooth, about 2 +x +the width of punctation. + + +Abdomen: Six visible ventrites. Ventrites 1-4 smooth; finely punctate; posterior margins truncate. First visible ventrite with a longitudinal carina that reaches the posterolateral angles (Fig. 7E); ventrites 3-4 slightly convex; hind margins truncate. Fifth visible ventrite convex; lateral margins oblique; posterior margin broadly, relatively deeply emarginate; hind angles narrowly rounded. Sixth visible ventrite subtriangular; rugulose; surface puncticulate, feebly convex; broader than long; lateral margins broadly oblique; posterior margin narrow, truncate; hind angles rounded (Fig. 16F). Fifth tergite rugulose; surface moderately convex; finely punctate; posterior margin shallowly emarginate. Sixth tergite broadly triangular; rugulose; surface very slightly +convex +; lateral margins strongly oblique, narrowing apically, producing a constricted, somewhat acuminate posterior margin (Fig. 16E). Sixth tergite extending beyond apical margin of sixth visible ventrite. + + +Aedeagus: Phallobasic apodeme present; phallus with copulatory piece tapered at apex; phallic plate unarmed, devoid of denticles; intraspicular plate present, elongate; phallobasic apodeme short, not expanded distally; phallobase subparallel; parameres free; tegmen incomplete, partially covering phallus; parameres pointed anteriorly; endophallic struts long; endophallic struts slender distally (Fig. 18 +D-E +). + +Sexual dimorphism: Females differ from males by having the posterior margin of the first and second visible ventrites truncate (Fig. 7E), and not acuminate (Fig. 7F) as observed in males. Additionally, females have the fifth visible ventrite rugose, with the lateral margins oblique and the posterior margin truncate; the sixth visible ventrite is rugulose, semicircular in shape, with the surface convex, and the lateral and posterior margins broadly rounded; the fifth tergite is rugulose, the lateral margins are oblique and the posterior margin is truncate; and the sixth tergite is rugulose, broader than long, with the surface inconspicuously convex, and the lateral and posterior margins strongly oblique and slightly acuminate posteriorly. + + +Material examined. +PARATYPES: 1 male, 1 female: 23 mi S of Matias Romero, Oaxaca, Mexico, 6-IV-1962, F. D. Parker and L. A. Stange. + + +Additional material examined. +2 males, 3 females: Jalisco, Mexico, Estacion de Biologia Chamela, VIII-21-1991, E. Ramirez; 3 females: Jalisco, Mexico, Estacion de Biologia Chamela, trampa de luz, VII-15-1986, R. A. Usela; 1 female: Jalisco, Mexico, Estacion de Biologia Chamela, trampa de luz, VII-13- 1986, R. A. Usela; 3 females: Jalisco, Mexico, Estacion de Biologia Chamela, trampa de luz, VII-9- 1986, R. A. Usela; 2 males, 1 female: Jalisco, Mexico, Estacion de Biologia Chamela, trampa de luz, VII-3- 1986, F. A. Noguera; 2 males, 3 females: Jalisco, Mexico, Estacion de Biologia Chamela, VII-15- 1986, R. A. Usela; 2 males: Jalisco, Mexico, Estacion de Biologia Chamela, atraido a la luz, VII-15- 1986, F. A. Noguera; 3 males, 1 female: Jalisco, Mexico, Chamela, VI-17- 1990, A la luz, F. A. Noguera; 2 males, 3 females: Jalisco, Mexico, Chamela, VI-15- 1990, A la luz, F. A. Noguera; 1 male: Mexico, Jalisco, Chamela, atraido a la luz, VII-7- 1986, F. A. Noguera; 2 males, 2 females: Jalisco, Mexico, Estacion de Biol. Chamela, VII-15-23-1987, F. T. Hovore, at UV and MV light; 3 males, 2 females: Jalisco, Mexico, Chamela, vic. UNAM, VII-9-19-1993, J. E. Wappes; 3 females: Jalisco, Mexico, vic. Estacion de Biologia Chamela, UNAM, VII-9-14-1993, Black light, Morris, Huether, Wappes; 2 males, 4 females: Jalisco, Mexico, Est. Biol. Chamela, VII-10-20-1985, E. Giesbert; 3 males, 2 females: Jalisco, Mexico, Chamela, vic. UNAM, VII-9-19-1993, J. Wappes; 2 males: Mexico, Jalisco, Estacion Biologica Chamela, VII-10-10-1985, E. Giesbert; 3 males, 1 female male: Jalisco, Mexico, Est. Biologica Chamela, VII-9-1981, Curoecol, trampa de luz, no collector data. + + +Remarks. + +Interspecific variation in integument color and fasciae arrangement is a very common condition among numerous clerid species, and various descriptive works ( +Wolcott 1909 +, +1921 +, +Rifkind 1993b +, +Leavengood 2008 +, +Rifkind et al. 2010 +; +Burke 2013 +, +Burke and Zolnerowich 2014 +, 2015) have shown that abdominal and +aedeagal +differences are the most reliable morphological characters used for delineating interspecific boundaries within +Cleridae +. +Barr (1978) +described +Bogcia disjuncta +and +B. oaxacae +from the Pacific coast of Mexico, designating +B. disjuncta +as the type species. Differences in integument color and fascia pattern were the principal characters used by Barr to separate these species. The integument color and fasciae pattern from specimens examined here and identified as +B. disjuncta +and +B. oaxacae +, including one male and one female paratype of +B. oaxacae +, were highly variable and many intermediate forms were observed (Figs 1F, 2A). Additionally, the aedeagal and pygidial structures of these individuals were very similar and consistent (Fig. 18 +D-E +). Consequently, the characters provided by Barr to separate these species are not sufficient to retain them as separate entities, and we designate +B. oaxacae +as a junior synonym of +B. disjuncta +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0D/75/370D75FFAA69BCEFF2B0E86E50E97AD1.xml b/data/37/0D/75/370D75FFAA69BCEFF2B0E86E50E97AD1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ab2f7a8870f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0D/75/370D75FFAA69BCEFF2B0E86E50E97AD1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ + + + +New records and detailed distribution and abundance of selected arthropod species collected between 1999 and 2011 in Azorean native forests + + + +Author + +Borges, Paulo A. V. + + + +Author + +Gaspar, Clara + + + +Author + +Crespo, Luis Carlos Fonseca + + + +Author + +Rigal, Francois + + + +Author + +Cardoso, Pedro + + + +Author + +Pereira, Fernando + + + +Author + +Rego, Carla + + + +Author + +Amorim, Isabel R. + + + +Author + +Melo, Catarina + + + +Author + +Aguiar, Carlos + + + +Author + +Andre, Genage + + + +Author + +Mendonca, Enesima P. + + + +Author + +Ribeiro, Servio + + + +Author + +Hortal, Joaquin + + + +Author + +Santos, Ana M. C. + + + +Author + +Barcelos, Luis + + + +Author + +Enghoff, Henrik + + + +Author + +Mahnert, Volker + + + +Author + +Pita, Margarida T. + + + +Author + +Ribes, Jordi + + + +Author + +Baz, Arturo + + + +Author + +Sousa, Antonio B. + + + +Author + +Vieira, Virgilio + + + +Author + +Wunderlich, Joerg + + + +Author + +Parmakelis, Aristeidis + + + +Author + +Whittaker, Robert J. + + + +Author + +Quartau, Jose Alberto + + + +Author + +Serrano, Artur R. M. + + + +Author + +Triantis, Kostas A. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +10948 +10948 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 +1314-2828-4-10948 + + + + +Acupalpus dubius Schilsky, 1888 + + + +Ecological interactions + +Native status +Native + + + +Distribution +FLO; FAI; GRA; SJG*; TER; SMG; SMR + + +Notes +Also present: MAD (Biogeographical Realm: Western Palearctic) + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0D/9B/370D9B13431953B68E3682193717402B.xml b/data/37/0D/9B/370D9B13431953B68E3682193717402B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..75045c658d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0D/9B/370D9B13431953B68E3682193717402B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ + + + +The medicinal plants of Myanmar + + + +Author + +DeFilipps, Robert A. +Deceased + + + +Author + +Krupnick, Gary A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1357-4826 +Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC- 166, Washington, DC, 20013 - 7012, USA +krupnick@si.edu + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2018 + +2018-06-28 + + +102 + + +1 +341 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.102.24380 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.102.24380 +1314-2003-102-1 +AA226A35FFF8FFBC37621A40C2518C67 +1306325 + + + + +Clerodendrum thomsoniae Balf.f. + + + +Names. + +Myanmar +: +tike-pan +, +taik-pan-gyi +. +English +: bag-flower, bleeding-heart vine, glory tree, tropical bleeding heart. + + + +Range. +West and West-Central tropical Africa. Cultivated in Myanmar. + + +Uses. + +Plant used for medicinal purposes (exact uses not given in +Nordal 1963 +). + + + +Notes. + +Other members of the genus are reported as used medicinally in India, China, Thailand, Korea, and Japan for the treatment of such diseases as syphilis, typhoid, cancer, jaundice, and hypertension ( +Shrivastava and Patel 2007 +). + + +Major +chemical compounds have been reported from this genus. These include phenolics, steroids, di- and tri-terpenes, flavonoids, volatile oils, etc. ( +Shrivastava and Patel 2007 +). + + + +Reference. + +Nordal (1963) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0D/BE/370DBED076319D7FDF639C6C73DB2BC9.xml b/data/37/0D/BE/370DBED076319D7FDF639C6C73DB2BC9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a4f6dae2cc9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0D/BE/370DBED076319D7FDF639C6C73DB2BC9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@ + + + +A revision of Dissochaeta (Melastomataceae, Dissochaeteae) + + + +Author + +Kartonegoro, Abdulrokhman + + + +Author + +Veldkamp, Jan Frits + + + +Author + +Hovenkamp, Peter + + + +Author + +Welzen, Peter van + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2018 + +107 + + +1 +178 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.107.26548 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.107.26548 +1314-2003-107-1 +686CFF85FFADFFEAC033443CF54BFFFC +1346433 + + + + +22. +Dissochaeta glandulosa Merr., Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 15: 224. 1929. +Map 15 + + + +Type. + +Malaysia. Sabah: Myburgh Province, Sandakan, +Oct-Dec +1921, A.D.E. Elmer 20259 (lectotype, designated here: BO [BO1421691]!; isolectotypes: BISH [BISH-1003260, image seen]!, BM [BM001190924, BM001190925]!, BR [BR00000522241, image seen]!, BRI [BRI-AQ0023052, image seen]!, C [C10014564, image seen]!, CAS [CAS0033425, image seen]!, CM [CM-1527, image seen]!, F [F65407, image seen]!, GH [GH00072204, GH00072205, images seen]!, HBG [HBG514873, image seen]!, K [K000859503]!, L [L0537261]!, MICH [MICH-1111782, image seen]!, NY [NY00228564, image seen]!, PH [PH00009602, PH00009603, images seen]!, S [SG-2104, image seen]!, U [U0124130]!). + + + +Description. + +Climbing up to 15 m in height. Branchlets terete, 3-4 mm in diameter, glabrous; nodes swollen, with crest-like interpetiolar ridge; internodes 7-11 cm long. Leaves: petioles terete, 1.3-1.8 cm long, glabrous; blades broadly ovate, 8.5-11.5 +x +5.6-6.7 cm, subcoriaceous, base rounded to emarginate, margin entire, apex acuminate, tip up to 1 cm long; nervation with 1 pair of lateral nerves and 1 pair of intramarginal nerves; surfaces glabrous, basally with a pair of glandular patches on abaxially. Inflorescences terminal, up to 25 cm long, many-flowered; main axis glabrous; primary axes up to 11 cm long with 3 nodes, secondary axes 4-4.5 cm long with 1 or 2 nodes, tertiary axes ca. 2 cm long with 1 node; bracts elliptic-oblong, 20-27 +x +8-10 mm, glabrous, whitish; bracteoles oblong to lanceolate, ca. 14 +x +3-4 mm, glabrous, whitish; pedicels glabrous, purplish, 4-5 mm long in central flowers, 3-4 mm long in lateral flowers. Hypanthium campanulate, 5-6 +x +4-5 mm, glabrous, at early stages subglobose to urceolate and enclosing petal bud; calyx lobes truncate, level, 1-2 mm long; petal bud conical, 6-7 mm long; mature petals broadly ovate, 5-6 +x +ca. 5 mm, base clawed, apex acute, purple above, whitish below. Stamens 8, subequal, filaments curved sideways, light yellow; alternipetalous stamens with ca. 6 mm long filaments, anthers slender, curved, sickle-shaped, thecae ca. 4 mm long, pedoconnective ca. 1 mm long, apex acute, basal crest thin, 1-1.5 mm long, margin erose to fimbriate, lateral appendages paired, filiform, 2-4 mm long, fimbriate; oppositipetalous stamens with 5-6 mm long filaments, bent at the attachment to anthers, anthers thick, slightly curved, hook-shaped, thecae 5-6 mm long, apex obtuse, yellow, basal crest thin, ligular, 2-2.5 mm long, bifid, lateral appendages paired, filiform, up to 2 mm long. Ovary half as long as hypanthium, apex villous; style ca. 14 mm long, glabrous, curved at the end, slender, light green-yellow; stigma minute, purplish; extra-ovarial chambers shallow to nearly undeveloped. Fruits urceolate, ca. 10 +x +6 mm, glabrous; calyx lobe remnants persistent. Seeds ca. 0.75 mm long. + + + +Distribution. +Borneo. + + +Ecology and habitat. +Lowland Mixed Dipterocarp forests on ridge at 50-400 m elevation. + + +Note. + + +Dissochaeta glandulosa + +resembles + +D. beccariana + +because of the similar glabrous indumentum and conspicuous white bracts. However, this species has a much larger campanulate hypanthium (5-6 +x +4-5 mm in + +D. glandulosa + +, 4-7 +x +2-3 mm in + +D. beccariana + +) and urceolate fruits (subglobose in + +D. beccariana + +). + + + +Specimens examined. + +BRUNEI. Belait +: Labi, Bukit Teraja, 350 m, 18 Oct 1991, D.A. Simpson & M. Marsh 2115 (K, L). +Temburong +: Amo, Ulu Belalong, 480 m, 20 Jan 1994, M.J.E. Coode et al. 7864 (L). +MALAYSIA. Sabah +: Nabawan, Ulu Sungai Nabawan, 22 Feb 1990, Fidilis SAN 128385 (L); Penampang, Crocker Range, Kota +Kinabalu-Tambunan +Road, 900 m, 1 Oct 1983, J.H. Beaman & R.S. Beaman 7110 (K, L); Pensiangan, Pensiangan Kayu FR, 23 Jul 1992, Fidilis SAN 136035 (K, L); Sandakan, Myburgh, Oct-Dec 1921, A.D.E. Elmer 20259 (BISH, BM, BO, BR, BRI, C, CAS, CM, F, GH, K, L, MICH, NY, PH, S, U); Ranau, Ulu Tungud, 343 m, 27 Jul 2005, L.G. Saw et al. SAN 146062 (L); +Ibid. +, Mount Kinabalu, Penibukan, 1200 m, 14 Mar 1931, J.Clemens & M.S. Clemens 32150 (BM). +Sarawak +: Betong, Batang Layar, 1 Jul 1980, B. Lee S.41990 (L); Bintulu, Bukit Pesu, Ulu Kuala Semut, 160 m, 20 Aug 1963, H.P. Fuchs 21352 (K, L); +Ibid. +, Ulu Segan, 274 m, 25 Aug 1968, Ilias Paie S.27219 (K, L); Kapit, Belaga, Rejang River, 500 m, 31 Aug 1958, M. Jacobs 5361 (K, L), Pelagus Protected Forest, 100 m, 16 Sep 1973, P.K. Chai et al. S.33173 (BO, K, L); +Ibid. +, Ulu Baleh, 400 m, 6 May 1991, Runi et al. S.63213 (K, L); Kuching, Selang FR., 91 m, 25 Jul 1957, Ilias Paie S.8462 (K, L); Lundu, G.D. Haviland 1508 (BM, K); Miri, Mulu, Gunung Mulu National Park, 400 m, 14 Oct 1977, P.K. Chai S.39492 (K, L). +INDONESIA. Central Kalimantan +: Kotawaringin Timur, Mentaya River, 50 m, 11 Feb 1994, G. Argent & P. Wilkie 9441 (L). +East Kalimantan +: West Kutai, Long Petah, 600 m, 10 Sep 1925, F.H. Endert 3126 (BO, K). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0E/66/370E66720ED4C61CC7D4DC222C42B4CF.xml b/data/37/0E/66/370E66720ED4C61CC7D4DC222C42B4CF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2156b522cf0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0E/66/370E66720ED4C61CC7D4DC222C42B4CF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Papilio prorsa +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + +P. N. alis dentatis subfuscis: fascia utrinque alba: primoribus interrupta. + +Roes. ins. +1. +pap. +1. +t. +8. +f. +6, 7. + + + + +Habitat in +Urtica +Germaniae. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0E/A7/370EA742C787529FB88000DCD7827D2A.xml b/data/37/0E/A7/370EA742C787529FB88000DCD7827D2A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..13e5d123766 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0E/A7/370EA742C787529FB88000DCD7827D2A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ + + + +An annotated checklist of the Crambidae of the region of Murcia (Spain) with new records, distribution and biological data (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea, Crambidae) + + + +Author + +Garre, Manuel J. +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain + + + +Author + +Girdley, John +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain + + + +Author + +Guerrero, Juan J. +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain + + + +Author + +Rubio, Rosa M. +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain + + + +Author + +Ortiz, Antonio S. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-6096 +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain +aortiz@um.es + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2021 + +2021-08-03 + + +9 + + +69388 +69388 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e69388 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e69388 +1314-2828-9-e69388 +65689D3026F55F7DA415A977389BD22F + + + + + +Anania (Anania) verbascalis ([Denis & +Schiffermueller +], 1775) + + + + +Distribution +Eurasiatic + + +Notes +Biological data: Bivoltine. Flight period: IX. First record in Murcia Region. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0E/B1/370EB1E743253CDB1559F02264B7C069.xml b/data/37/0E/B1/370EB1E743253CDB1559F02264B7C069.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..59d32c82440 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0E/B1/370EB1E743253CDB1559F02264B7C069.xml @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ + + + +A review of gorgonian coral species (Cnidaria, Octocorallia, Alcyonacea) held in the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History research collection: focus on species from Scleraxonia, Holaxonia, Calcaxonia - Part III: Suborder Holaxonia continued, and suborder Calcaxonia + + + +Author + +Horvath, Elizabeth Anne + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +860 + + +183 +306 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.860.34317 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.860.34317 +1313-2970-860-183 +A3F9127D8ED24F8296A39510EB039A9C + + + + +Genus +Acanella Gray in Wright, 1869 + + + + +Acanella +Gray in Wright, 1869: 23-26. +Gray 1870 +: 16. Wright in +Studer 1887 +: 44. +Nutting 1910b +: 14. + +Kuekenthal +1915a + +: 117, 119; +1919 +: 573; +1924 +: 414. +Deichmann 1936 +: 243. +Bayer 1956 +: F222; 1981: 941 (key). +Bayer and Stefani 1987a +: 51 (key); 1987b: 941 (key). + + +Isidella +Muzik, 1978: 737. + + + +Type species. + + +Mopsea arbusculum + +Johnson, 1862. + + + +Type locality. + +Atlantic Ocean, Canada, Nova Scotia, Sable Island, ~ +43°56'10"N +, +59°56'10"W +, 503 m. + + + +Type specimen. + +Type +(status not researched); YPM 4744 [dry]; as + +Acanella normani + +Verrill, 1878a, now considered synonymous with +Acanella (Mopsea) arbuscula +(Johnson, 1862). + + + +Material examined. +No specimens of this genus in collection at SBMNH. + + + +Diagnosis +. + +Colonies densely or openly bushy, moderate-sized (no more than 20 cm); usually anchored in soft substrates (ooze or fine sand) by lobate, root-like holdfast, in deep water. Colonies generally larger and compressed (to one meter in height) when attached to hard substrates. Internodes white; nodes generally some shade of brown. Branched in whorls (three to six, at least in upper parts) from horny nodes; internodes solid, shorter (up to 2.0 cm). Polyps generally non-retractile, often prominent, columnar; coenenchyme thin. Sclerites of polyps mostly spindles; some flattened blunt rods, with fine prickles or low warts. Larger spindles and/or rods in body wall; sometimes rods conspicuously projecting between bases of tentacles. Small, slightly flattened, sometimes thorny, rods and/or double stars in pharyngeal walls. + + +Etymology. +While members of this genus are commonly referred to as a type of Bamboo coral, no discussion of genus name derivation was found. Genus is listed with accepted status by Cordeiro et al. (2019). + + +Distribution. +Deep water, throughout all oceans, based on an examination of collection records for specimens housed at various institutions (MBARI, NMNH, CAS). + + +Biology. + +Verrill (unpublished personal note transcriptions made by Bayer) stated that most of the deep water +Alcyonaria +are bioluminescent; "among the +'phosphorescent' +gorgonians, the abundant deep-sea species, + +Acanella normani + +Verrill, 1878 was very +'phosphorescent.' +It is also very well protected by sclerites and has a highly developed root-like branching base for anchorage in the deep-sea ooze. This has allowed it to become one of the commonest and most widely diffused of all deep-sea genera." + + +From examinations of recent deep-water video and digital stills (MBARI), species in this genus are usually seen on a muddy/sandy soft bottom. + +Acanella dispar + +Bayer, 1990 (a species that was described from material taken in Hawaii, and thus, found in the Pacific Ocean) is the only species noted (thus far) that inhabits a hard bottom and has a stout trunk. + + + +Remarks. + +Discussion of this genus included as there are reports of unidentified species (noted by MBARI in collection/video records undertaken by them) found north of the California Bight. It is not certain what, if any, species from this genus occur within the Bight, geographically lying some distance south of +MBARI's +usual study locations. However, the California Bight has not been fully explored specifically for deeper water gorgonian forms; there is the possibility of species from this genus being found within it. + + +Andrews et al. (2005) +discussed a specimen of this genus collected off San Francisco, California that was used in an age determination study of a gorgonian colony, and MBARI (posting on-line) displayed an image of a specimen, identified to this genus, sighted on Davidson Seamount, at a depth of 1,682 m (photograph taken 28 January 2006). From the MBARI data lists, roughly four specimens collected have been identified to this genus. Several other observations, without collection, have also been recorded in the area extending from southwest of Morro Bay to off the coast of Oregon (lat./long range of 35/36-45°N, 122-130°W). As for the total number of species within this genus, most are from the Atlantic; Cordeiro et al. (2019) in the WoRMS Database list 13 species. CAS has five specimens recorded, three from Japan +and +two from USA, Massachusetts, off +Martha's +Vineyard, while the NMNH has quite a few specimens (~305), from either Hawaii, Japan, the Philippines, or Indonesia; however, the vast majority are from the North Atlantic. Pacific Ocean species include the previously mentioned + +A. dispar + +Bayer, 1990 as well as + +A. sibogae + +Nutting, 1910b and + +A. weberi + +Nutting, 1910b. Further expeditions, with collection and study, need to be done to determine if species from this genus occur within the California Bight. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0F/22/370F222D1F585CDBBBCE948AA5B0CEB8.xml b/data/37/0F/22/370F222D1F585CDBBBCE948AA5B0CEB8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4edd3aa40e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0F/22/370F222D1F585CDBBBCE948AA5B0CEB8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,325 @@ + + + +The genus Cletocamptus (Harpacticoida, Canthocamptidae): a reappraisal, with proposal of a new subfamily, a new genus, and a new species + + + +Author + +Gomez, Samuel +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8597-8846 +Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia, Unidad Academica Mazatlan; Joel Montes Camarena s / n, Mazatlan, 82040, Sinaloa, Mexico +samuelgomez@ola.icmyl.unam.mx + + + +Author + +Yanez-Rivera, Beatriz +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3192-2142 +Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia-Centro de Investigacion en Alimentacion y Desarrollo, Unidad Mazatlan en Acuicultura y Manejo Ambiental; Av. Sabalo Cerritos s / n, Estero del Yugo, Mazatlan, 82112, Sinaloa, Mexico + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2022 + +2022-01-07 + + +1080 + + +165 +208 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.71192 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.71192 +1313-2970-1080-165 +966E76BB32094D2AA0146AADE07A9823 +D5E8AC15DBC05F3D949AD2F7B2F75B54 + + + + +Cletocamptoides biushelo +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 1 +, 2 +, 3 +, 4 +, 5 +, 6 +, 7 + + + +Type locality. + +Urias +estuary, +Mazatlan +, Sinaloa State, stn. 5 ( +23.2056°N +, +106.3715°W +; 0.6 m depth; organic carbon content 0.99%; organic matter content 1.71%; sand 78.61%; clay 6.72%; silt 14.67%) (see also + +Gomez +2020 + +: 43, fig. 1). + + + +Other localities. + +Urias +estuary, +Mazatlan +, Sinaloa State, stn. 7 ( +23.2174°N +, +106.3917°W +; 3.7 m depth; organic carbon content 5.59%; organic matter content 9.62%; sand 10.78%; clay 37.54%; silt 51.68%) (see also + +Gomez +2020 + +: 43, fig. 1). + + + +Material examined. + +Female +holotype +dissected (ICML-EMUCOP-180119-179); +18 Jan. 2019 +; S. +Gomez +leg. One additional female from stn 7 (see above) was used for molecular analyses. + + + +Description. + +Female. +Total body length of holotype 411 +µm +measured from anterior tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami. Habitus (Fig. +1A, D +) semi-cylindrical, progressively tapering posteriad, without clear demarcation between prosome and urosome; body with somitic constrictions between somites; without cuticular sensilla-bearing socles. Prosome (Fig. +1A, D +) consisting of cephalothorax, P1-bearing somite fully incorporated to the latter, and three free-pedigerous somites bearing P2-P4. Rostrum (Figs +1A, D +, +3A +) well-developed, not fused to cephalothorax, triangular, with wide base and rounded tip, with two subdistal sensilla, with row of subdistal spinules ventrally. Cephalothorax with depressions and with sensilla as shown; posterodorsal margin serrated, lateral margin with short slender spinules. P2-P4-bearing somites with posterior sensilla as depicted; posterior margin serrated; lateral margin with short slender spinules. Urosome (Figs +1A, D +, +2A +) comprising fifth pedigerous somite, genital double-somite, two free abdominal somites, and anal somite. P5-bearing somite largely as in previous somite but with fewer sensilla. Second (genital somite) and third urosomites separated dorsolaterally, fused ventrally forming genital double-somite; first half with posterior margin serrated, posterior half with posterior slender short spinules; both halves with sensilla as shown; anterior half with P6 (see below); posterior half with ventrolateral small slender spinules as depicted. Fourth urosomite largely as preceding somite (second half of genital double-somite), but with more spinules lateroventrally. Fifth somite as previous one dorsolaterally, ventrally with fewer spinular rows. Anal somite slightly wider than long; with small triangular operculum ornamented with small dorsal spinules, flanked by pair of sensilla; ventrally cleft medially, with pair of medial pores, with inner small spinules along inner margin of medial cleft. Caudal rami 1.5 +x +as long as wide; with inner long slender spinules; with six setae as follows: seta I missing; seta II and III lateral, issuing midway outer margin of ramus, the former proximal to and slightly as long as half the length of the later; seta IV arising at outer distal corner, as long as seta III, with bulbous base; seta V longest, without breaking plane, minutely bipinnate; seta VI issuing at inner distal corner, slightly shorter than seta IV, with two proximal spinules as shown, with bulbous base; dorsal seta VII located at the center of ramus, as long as seta III, tri-articulated at its base. + + + +Figure 2. + +Cletocamptoides biushelo + +sp. nov., female holotype +A +urosome, ventral (P5-bearing somite omitted) +B +P5, anterior. + + + +Antennule (Fig. +3A +) six-segmented; first segment with two inner spinular rows, remaining segments with outer spinular row as depicted; all setae smooth. Armature formula as follows: 1[1], 2[7], 3[4], 4[1+(1+ae)], 5[1], 6[8+(2+ae)]. + + + +Figure 3. + +Cletocamptoides biushelo + +sp. nov., female holotype +A +rostrum and antennule +B +antenna. + + + +Antenna (Fig. +3B +) with allobasis ornamented with short longitudinal row of spinules proximally, armed with two abexopodal setae (one basal, one endopodal). Exopod one-segmented, minute, with one seta. Free endopodal segment as long as allobasis, with inner spinules proximally and subdistally, and with outer subdistal frill; with two inner spines and one slender seta medially, distally with two inner spines, two medial geniculate setae, and one outer spinulose element. + + +Mandible (Fig. +4A +) with well-developed coxa ornamented with short spinular row as shown; gnathobase well-developed, with bi- and unicuspid teeth distally, and one thick bulbous element, and one ventral pinnate seta. Palp one-segmented, with three setae (one basal, two endopodal). + + + +Figure 4. + +Cletocamptoides biushelo + +sp. nov., female holotype +A +mandible +B +maxillule +C +maxilla +D +maxilliped. + + + +Maxillule (Fig. +4B +) with robust praecoxa ornamented with spinules at base of coxal endite, and medially and ventrally on arthrite, the latter with one surface seta, seven distal spines and one ventral strong unipinnate seta. Coxal endite with two setae. Endopod and exopod incorporated to basis, the latter with four, endopod with one, exopod with two setae. + + +Maxilla (Fig. +4C +) with syncoxa ornamented with medial and distal rows of small spinules, and with few larger outer spinules; with two endites bearing three setae each. Allobasis drawn out into claw accompanied by one seta. Endopod completely incorporated to basis, represented by three setae. + + +Maxilliped (Fig. +4D +) subchelate. Syncoxa with spinules as shown, with one subdistal seta. Basis with one anterior and one posterior spinular row, with outer spinules proximally and subdistally. Endopod drawn out into curved claw with minute accessory seta. + + +P1 (Fig. +5A +) with elongate bare intercoxal sclerite. Praecoxa triangular, with medial subdistal row of spinules. Coxa rectangular, wider than long, with two medial transverse rows of spinules as shown, and one posterior and one anterior short row of larger spinules close to outer margin. Basis with anterior spinules medially, on outer margin, at base of inner and outer spines, and between rami. Exopod three-segmented, situated at a lower level than the endopod, reaching tip of ENP2; segments with outer and subdistal spinules as shown; EXP1 without, EXP2 with inner seta; EXP3 with two outer spines and two distal setae of which innermost geniculate. Endopod two segmented, not prehensile; segments with inner and outer long slender spinules as depicted; ENP1 unarmed; ENP2 with three setae. + + + +Figure 5. + +Cletocamptoides biushelo + +sp. nov., female holotype +A +P1, anterior +B +P2, anterior. + + + +P2-P3 (Figs +5B +, +6A +) with elongate bare intercoxal sclerite. Praecoxa triangular, with transverse row of spinules as shown. Coxa rectangular, wider than long; with one medial and one outer spinular row. Basis with spinules medially, at base of endopod, and between rami; with outer seta (of P2 visibly shorter than in P3). Exopod three-segmented, situated at a lower level than endopod; spinular ornamentation of segments as shown; EXP1 and EXP2 with, EXP3 without inner distal frill; EXP1 without, EXP2 with inner seta with comb tip; EXP3 with one inner element without comb tip, two distal setae, and two outer spines. Endopod two-segmented; segments with spinular ornamentation as shown; ENP1 small, as long as wide, unarmed; ENP2 elongated, with three setae. + + +P4 (Fig. +6B +) with intercoxal sclerite, praecoxa, coxa and basis as in P3. Exopod largely as in P3 except for two apical setae, and two outer spines on EXP3. Endopod one-segmented, minute, wider than long; with two setae of which innermost reduced. + + + +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
-P1P2P3P4P5
Exopod0,1,0220,1,1220,1,1220,1,0223
Endopod0,2100,1110,1110205
+ + + +Figure 6. + +Cletocamptoides biushelo + +sp. nov., female holotype +A +P3, anterior +B +P4, anterior. + + +P1-P5 armature formulae as follows: + +P5 (Fig. +2B +) with baseoendopod and exopod fused, rami separated by shallow notch; spinular ornamentation as shown. Baseoendopod with outer seta arising from short setophore; endopodal lobe with five setae. Exopod with three setae. + + +Genital field (Fig. +2A +) with median copulatory pore on second half of genital double-somite; each P6 represented by two setae. + + +Male. +Unknown. + + + +Etymology. + +The specific epithet is an anagram for " +Cletocamptus helobius +" and refers to the close relationship between the Mexican new species and + +C. helobius + +comb. nov. + + + +Figure 7. +Schematic representation of the evolution of the mandibular palp in +Cletocamptinae +subfam. nov. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0F/33/370F33615925F2B9ACCB1C75C1981970.xml b/data/37/0F/33/370F33615925F2B9ACCB1C75C1981970.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a611602592c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0F/33/370F33615925F2B9ACCB1C75C1981970.xml @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ + + + +Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 1. Pteridophyta bis Caryophyllaceae (2 nd edition): Registerzuband 1 + + + +Author + +Hess, Hans Ernst + + + +Author + +Landolt, Elias + + + +Author + +Hirzel, Rosmarie + +text + +1972 +Birkhaeuser Verlag + + +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291815 + +book +291815 +10.5281/zenodo.291815 +3-7643-0843-5 + + + +<subSubSection id="92CAC1E7C30DFD596039762EACE35336" pageId="null" pageNumber="605" type="nomenclature"> +<paragraph id="2CB6A9A5D485AA0D4A5C992577548AC0" pageId="null" pageNumber="605"> +<taxonomicName id="6789A8587B10FE45F6520D155657763E" ID-CoL="8VW39" ID-ENA="78718" class="Liliopsida" family="Orchidaceae" genus="Cephalanthera" kingdom="Plantae" order="Asparagales" pageId="null" pageNumber="605" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="genus"> +<pageBreakToken id="87F6592ACFC821721C0AD32CD1A085BC" pageId="null" pageNumber="605" start="start">Cephalanthera</pageBreakToken> +</taxonomicName> +<taxonomicName id="B2BCBC01F367B90C5F1B4517105890C0" authority="(Mill.) Druce" authorityName="Druce" baseAuthorityName="Mill." class="Liliopsida" family="Alismataceae" genus="Damasonium" kingdom="Plantae" order="Alismatales" pageId="null" pageNumber="605" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="genus"> +<normalizedToken id="0CEB443BC45B6E0E0CEB2CE60C7CC77D" originalValue="Damasónium" pageId="null" pageNumber="605">Damasonium</normalizedToken> +(Mill.) Druce +</taxonomicName> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="D532B4DB6F404F42C129E234F73C3C5A" pageId="null" pageNumber="605" type="reference_group"> +<paragraph id="B8B74D563B482D5CAFB8BFC58D73BFCC" pageId="null" pageNumber="605"> +( +<taxonomicName id="C8FF4C52E946FA0F6A4BAB3224A338E1" class="Liliopsida" family="Cyperaceae" genus="Carex" kingdom="Plantae" order="Poales" pageId="null" pageNumber="605" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="alba"> +<emphasis id="C3FF580159516792B738565329F2DD0C" italics="true" pageId="null" pageNumber="605">C. alba</emphasis> +</taxonomicName> +[Crantz] Simonkai, +<taxonomicName id="D24FEDFEF04182407660586EA621A9FE" class="Liliopsida" family="Orchidaceae" genus="Cephalanthera" kingdom="Plantae" order="Asparagales" pageId="null" pageNumber="605" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="pallens"> +<emphasis id="7B1696C8637BC254A0153B791A7F4CA0" italics="true" pageId="null" pageNumber="605">C. pallens</emphasis> +</taxonomicName> +[Sw.] Rich., +<taxonomicName id="50303B3926C71FDC216A1FD7B43E308C" class="Liliopsida" family="Orchidaceae" genus="Epipactis" kingdom="Plantae" order="Asparagales" pageId="null" pageNumber="605" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="latifolia"> +<emphasis id="C0A0A4ABB529076DB862A76E64C4CB83" italics="true" pageId="null" pageNumber="605">C. latifolia</emphasis> +</taxonomicName> +[Mill.] Janchen) +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="9251E29852FFAA3CF9CC6F06E6C858BD" pageId="null" pageNumber="605" type="vernacular_names"> +<paragraph id="BFAE0AE9B4CB088C59DC7B3C1968202F" pageId="null" pageNumber="605"> +<normalizedToken id="D8AF8C4C2B7F41AE67C3A483637915FC" originalValue="Weißes" pageId="null" pageNumber="605">Weisses</normalizedToken> +<normalizedToken id="92421431942528FE6BD73BFC02C416C7" originalValue="Waldvögelein" pageId="null" pageNumber="605">Waldvoegelein</normalizedToken> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> + + + +Blaetter +oval bis lanzettlich, spitz, bis 10 cm lang, +nicht gefaltet, etwa 3mal so lang wie breit. +Stengel kahl. +Bluetenstand +4-8 +bluetig +. + +Untere +Tragblaetter +in Form und +Groeβe +wie die +Stengelblaetter + +, obere schmal lanzettlich, wenig +laenger +als der Fruchtknoten. + +Perigonblaetter +weiβ +bis gelblich + +, 15-25 mm lang, +stumpf. +Fruchtknoten kahl. - +Bluete +: +Frueher +Sommer. + + +Zytologische Angaben. 2n = 32: +Material aus Skandinavien; apomiktische Fortpflanzung; gelegentlich 2 Embryonen im gleichen Embryosack (Hagerup 1947). +2n += +36: +Ohne Herkunftsangabe (Barber 1942); aus Polen (Skalinska et al. 1957), aus Holland (Kliphuis 1963). + + +Standort. +Kollin und montan. Lockere, humose, meist kalkhaltige, +maessig +feuchte bis trockene +Boeden +. Schattige +Waelder +( +Buchenwaelder +, +Laubmischwaelder +, +Foehrenwaelder +), vor allem im +Carici-Fagetum +Moor 1952. + + + +Verbreitung. +Europaeische +Pflanze: + +Nordwaerts +bis England, Norddeutschland, Baltikum, +ostwaerts +bis Polen; +Suedgrenze +durch das Mediterrangebiet (Nordwestafrika), +ostwaerts +bis Kleinasien und Kaukasus. - Im Gebiet verbreitet, ziemlich +haeufig +, aber nur einzelne Pflanzen. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0F/AE/370FAEC8B2EFC356E06408FAEE20A84C.xml b/data/37/0F/AE/370FAEC8B2EFC356E06408FAEE20A84C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..71b00861404 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0F/AE/370FAEC8B2EFC356E06408FAEE20A84C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ + + + +Checklist of the subfamily Adoncholaiminae Gerlach and Riemann, 1974 (Nematoda: Oncholaimida: Oncholaimidae) of the world: genera, species, distribution, and reference list for taxonomists and ecologists + + + +Author + +Shimada, Daisuke + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +6577 +6577 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e6577 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e6577 +1314-2828--6577 + + + + +Adoncholaimus bandaensis Kreis, 1932 + + + + +Adoncholaimus bandaensis +Invalid: transferred to the genus +Meyersia +by +Hopper (1967) +; see +Meyersia bandaensis + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0F/F9/370FF9574B366DD921CA2F91717F7149.xml b/data/37/0F/F9/370FF9574B366DD921CA2F91717F7149.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..535d6a32d62 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0F/F9/370FF9574B366DD921CA2F91717F7149.xml @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ + + + +Order Carnivora + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +532 +628 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Callorhinus ursinus +(Linnaeus 1758) + + + + + + + +[Phoca] ursina +Linnaeus 1758 + +, +Syst. Nat., 10th ed., Vol. 1: 37 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +"in Camschatcæ maritimus inter Asiam and Americam proximam, primario in infula Beringri," restricted by + +Thomas (1911 +a +) + +to "Bering Island." + +. + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Northern Fur Seal +. + + + + +Synonyms: + +Callorhinus alascanus +( +Jordan and Clark 1898 +) + +; + +Callorhinus californianus +(Gray 1866) + +; + +Callorhinus curilensis +(Jordan and Clark 1899) + +; + +Callorhinus cynocephala +(Walbaum 1792) + +; + +Callorhinus krachenninikowii +(Lesson 1828) + +; + +Callorhinus mimica +(Tilesius 1835) + +; + +Callorhinus nigra +( +Pallas 1811 +) + +. + + + + +Distribution: +North Pacific coastal regions in +Canada +, +China +(vagrant to +Shandong +), +Japan +, +Mexico +(costs of +Baja California +), +Russia +(Okhotsk and Bering Seas, Commander and Pribilof Isls), +USA +( +Alaska +, +Washington +, +Oregon +, S +California +). + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +– Vulnerable. + + + + +Discussion: +Subspecies not recognized, following +Taylor et al. (1955) +and +Rice (1998) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/0F/FF/370FFFB8BC4FCCA7370D414B27D116EB.xml b/data/37/0F/FF/370FFFB8BC4FCCA7370D414B27D116EB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..37fbffc65a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/0F/FF/370FFFB8BC4FCCA7370D414B27D116EB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Hornmilben (Oribatida) [pages 69 to 101] + + + +Author + +Weigmann, G. + + + +Author + +Miko, L. + +text + + +2006 +Goecke & Evers + +Keltern + + + +Hornmilben (Oribatida) [Dahl, Tierwelt Deutschlands, Teil 76] + + + +69 +101 + + + + +http://www.goeckeevers.de/verlag/dahl.html + +book chapter +Weigmann2006pp69to101 + + + + +Sellnickochthonius honestus +(Moritz, 1976) [48c] + + + + +Syn., Tax.: +Brachychochthonius honestus Moritz +, 1976(b): Balogh & Mahunka 1983 (B). + + + + +- " +Brachychthonius zelawaiensis +": Evans 1952b (B); Kunst 1971 (B). + + + + +Oekologie +: Feuchte +Waldboeden +. + + + +Verbreitung: Europa. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/10/87/371087F1FFAFFFE66DB9F8CFFD1AFED2.xml b/data/37/10/87/371087F1FFAFFFE66DB9F8CFFD1AFED2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8a43b89d862 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/10/87/371087F1FFAFFFE66DB9F8CFFD1AFED2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,287 @@ + + + +Two new species of the spider genus Cataleptoneta from Balkan Peninsula (Araneae, Leptonetidae) + + + +Author + +Wang, Chunxia + + + +Author + +Li, Shuqiang + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2010 + +2730 + + +57 +68 + + + +journal article +46895 +10.5281/zenodo.200151 +242ec0a3-2a29-43e6-baa9-eeef69627b9d +1175-5326 +200151 + + + + + + + +Cataleptoneta semipinnata + +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 5–8 +, +9 + + + + + +Type +material. +Holotype +: + +male ( +RMNH +), Aghia Sophia cave, m 60, Mylopotamos [36°14'36.35ʺN, 22°56'39.70ʺE], Island Kythira, +Greece +, +10 March 1984 +, P.R. Deeleman leg. + +Paratypes +: + +2 females +, same data as +holotype +; +1 male +, same but on +2 March 1983 +, E. Gittenberger leg. + + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Cataleptoneta lingulata + + +sp. nov. +, + +male holotype. A. Habitus, dorsal view; B. Palpal bulb, ventral view; C. Palp, prolateral view; D. Palp, retrolateral view. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Cataleptoneta lingulata + + +sp. nov. +, + +female holotype. A. Habitus, dorsal view; B. Habitus, ventral view; C. Spermatheca, dorsal view. + + + + +FIGURE 3. + +Cataleptoneta lingulata + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype, palp. A. Retrolateral view; B. Prolateral view. Scale bar: 0.10 mm. + + + + +FIGURE 4. + +Cataleptoneta lingulata + + +sp. nov. +, + +male holotype (C–D) and female paratype (A–B). A. Genital area, ventral view; B. Spermatheca, dorsal view; C. Chelicera, posterior view; D. Palpal bulb, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIGURE 5 +. + +Cataleptoneta semipinnata + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype. A. Habitus, dorsal view; B. Habitus, ventral view; C. Palp, prolateral view; D. Palp, retrolateral view. + + + + +FIGURE 6 +. + +Cataleptoneta semipinnata + + +sp. nov. +, + +female paratype. A. Habitus, dorsal view; B. Habitus, ventral view; C. Spermatheca, dorsal view. + + + + +FIGURE 7 +. + +Cataleptoneta semipinnata + + +sp. nov. +, + +male holotype, palp. A. Retrolateral view; B. Prolateral view. Scale bar: 0.10 mm. + + + + +FIGURE 8 +. + +Cataleptoneta semipinnata + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype (C–D) and female paratype (A–B). A. Genital area, ventral view; B. Spermatheca, dorsal view; C. Chelicera, posterior view; D. Palpal tibia, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from Latin “semi” and “pinna”, meaning “half” and “pinna”, and refers to the half pinnate-shaped, chitinous median apophysis of the male palpal bulb; term in apposition. + + + + +Diagnosis. +This new species is similar to + +C. aesculapii +( +Brignoli, 1968 +) + +, but can be distinguished by the palpal femur armed with eleven spines retrolaterally, which erected from small tubercles ( +Figs 5 +D, 7A), the palpal tibia with one digitiform apophysis prolaterally ( +Figs 5 +C, 7B), three strong spines and two, pudgy spines retrolaterally ( +Figs 5 +D, 7A), and the palpal bulb with one half pinnate-shaped median apophysis in the male ( +Figs 5 +C, 7B). + + + + + +Description. male ( +holotype +): + +total length 1.62 ( +Figs 5 +A–B). Prosoma 0.70 long, 0.50 wide. Opisthosoma 0.82 long, 0.62 wide. Sternum 0.50 long, 0.50 wide. Prosoma whitish. Six eyes. Eye measurements: ALE 0.04, PLE 0.05, PME 0.03; ALE-PME 0.06, PLE-PLE 0.04; PLE-PME 0.04. AER 0.08, PER 0.15. Median groove indistinct, cervical grooves and radial furrow distinct, yellowish. Clypeus 0.09 high, slightly sloped anterioly. Chelicerae ( +Fig. 8 +C) stubby, yellow, with eight promarginal teeth, and four small retromarginal teeth. Endites and labium yellow. Sternum and legs yellowish. Leg measurements: I 10.65 (2.65, 0.25, 3.40, 2.85, 1.50); II 6.87 (2.00, 0.25, 2.05, 1.70, 0.87); III 5.71 (1.62, 0.22, 1.62, 1.40, 0.85); IV 7.87 (2.20, 0.25, 2.37 2.05, 1.00). Leg formula: I-IV-II- III. Male palp ( +Figs 5 +C +– +D, 7A–B): femur armed with five strong spines prolaterally and eleven spines retrolaterally, which erected from small tubercles; patella with one short spine dorsodistally; tibia with three trichobothriae dorsally, one digitiform apophysis prolaterally and three strong spines, two pudgy spines retrolaterally; tarsus with one falciform spine retrolaterally. Tip of the bulb: median apophysis chitinous, half pinnate-shaped; conductor translucent; embolus pointed, weakly sclerotized. + + + +FIGURE 9. +Locality records for two + +Cataleptoneta + +species from Balkan Peninsula: 1. + +Cataleptoneta lingulata + + +sp. nov. + +, 2. + +Cataleptoneta semipinnata + +sp. nov. + + + + +Female (one of the +paratypes +): + +similar to male in coloration and general features, but with larger body size and longer legs ( +Figs 6 +A–B). Total length 1.75. Prosoma 0.65 long, 0.50 wide. Opisthosoma 1.05 long, 0.75 wide. Sternum 0.55 long, 0.50 wide. Clypeus 0.08 high. Leg measurements: I 10.70 (2.75, 0.25, 3.65, 2.65, 1.40); II 6.85 (2.00, 0.25, 2.00, 1.70, 0.90); III 5.12 (1.75, 0.22, 1.50, 1.05, 0.6); IV 7.92 (2.37, 0.25, 2.25, 2.05, 1.00). Leg formula: I-IV-II-III. Genital area ( +Fig. 8 +A) covered with long hairs. Internal genitalia ( +Figs 6 +C, 8B) with a pair of spermathecae and distinctly coiled and weakly sclerotized sperm ducts. + + +Variation. +Total length: males 1.60–1.62 (n = 2); females (1.75–1.78) (n = 2). + + + + +Distribution. +Greece +(Kythira) ( +Fig. 9 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/10/87/371087F1FFAFFFEC6DB9FDFAFD06F937.xml b/data/37/10/87/371087F1FFAFFFEC6DB9FDFAFD06F937.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b8bcb80ab33 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/10/87/371087F1FFAFFFEC6DB9FDFAFD06F937.xml @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ + + + +Two new species of the spider genus Cataleptoneta from Balkan Peninsula (Araneae, Leptonetidae) + + + +Author + +Wang, Chunxia + + + +Author + +Li, Shuqiang + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2010 + +2730 + + +57 +68 + + + +journal article +46895 +10.5281/zenodo.200151 +242ec0a3-2a29-43e6-baa9-eeef69627b9d +1175-5326 +200151 + + + + + + + +Cataleptoneta lingulata + +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 1–4 +, +9 + + + + + +Type +material. +Holotype +: + +male ( +RMNH +), Manita Peċ cave, coastal National Park [44°51'53.60ʺN, 15°16'18.74ʺE], Stari grad-Paklenica, Velebit Mountain, Dalmatia Province, +Croatia +, +14 April 1975 +, P.R. & C.L. Deeleman-Reinhold leg. + +Paratypes +: + +7 males +5 females +, same data as +holotype +; +2 males +2 females +, same but on +14 April 1971 +; +2 males +2 females +, same but on +13 April 1977 +; +3 males +3 females +, same but on +4 May 1978 +; +1 male +2 females +, same but on +26 October 1978 +. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from Latin “lingua”, meaning “tongue”, and refers to the tongueshaped conductor of the male palpal bulb; adjective. + + + + +Diagnosis. +This new species is similar to + +C. sbordonii +( +Brignoli, 1968 +) + +, but can be distinguished by the palpal tibia armed with three digitiform apophyses prolaterally ( +Figs 1 +C, 3B) and eight strong spines rerolaterally ( +Figs 1 +D, 3A), and the palpal bulb with two weakly sclerotized median apophyses: one hook-shaped, one earthwormshaped ( +Figs 1 +B–C, 3B, 4D) in the male. + + + + + +Description. male ( +holotype +): + +total length 1.66 ( +Fig. 1 +A). Prosoma 0.70 long, 0.65 wide. Opisthosoma 1.04 long, 0.60 wide. Sternum 0.45 long, 0.46 wide. Prosoma yellow. Six eyes. Eye measurements: ALE 0.05, PLE 0.09, PME 0.05; ALE-PME 0.05, PLE-PLE 0.05, PLE-PME 0.08; AER 0.10, PER 0.21. Median groove indistinct, cervical grooves and radial furrows distinct, pale brown. Clypeus 0.10 high, slightly sloped anteriorly. Chelicerae ( +Fig. 4 +C) stubby, yellow, with eight promarginal teeth, and four small retromarginal teeth. Endites and labium yellow. Sternum and legs yellowish. Leg measurements: I 6.35 (2.00, 0.2, 1.85, 1.40, 0.90); II 5.08 (1.50, 0.20, 1.42, 1.25, 0.71); III 4.10 (1.25, 0.20, 1.05, 1.00, 0.60); IV 5.37 (1.62, 0.20, 1.50 1.30, 0.75). Leg formula: I-IV-II-III. Male palp ( +Figs 1 +C–D, 3A–B): femur armed with four strong spines prolaterally and ten strong spines retrolaterally, which arise from small tubercles; patella with one short spine dorsodistally; tibia with three digitiform apophyses prolaterally, which decorated with one seta distally and eight strong spines retrolaterally, with the strongest 0.8 the length of tibia; tarsus with one podgy spine retrolaterally. Tip of bulb ( +Figs 2 +C, 4B): median apophyses sclerotized, one hook-shaped and one earthworm-shaped; conductor translucent and tongue-shaped; embolus pointed, weakly sclerotized. + + + +Female (one of the +paratypes +): + +similar to male in coloration and general features, but with a larger body size and shorter legs ( +Figs 2 +A–B). Total length 1.74. Prosoma 0.71 long, 0.60 wide. Opisthosoma 1.00 long, 0.75 wide. Sternum 0.44 long, 0.45 wide. Clypeus 0.08 high. Leg measurements: I 6.06 (1.87, 0.15, 1.65, 1.47, 0.92); II 4.36 (1.37, 0.20, 1.12, 1.00, 0.67); III 3.64 (1.12, 0.15, 0.90, 0.87, 0.60); IV 5.02 (1.60, 0.20, 1.37, 1.15, 0.70). Leg formula: I-IV-II-III. Genital area ( +Fig. 4 +A) covered with hairs. Internal genitalia ( +Figs 2 +C, 4B) with a pair of spermathecae and distinctly twisted and weakly sclerotized sperm ducts. + + +Variation. +Total length: males 1.63–1.70 (n = 16); females (1.72–1.76) (n = 14). + + + + +Distribution. +Croatia +(Dalmatia) ( +Fig. 9 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/11/1A/37111A9E88C74704BE84991640F7B8F3.xml b/data/37/11/1A/37111A9E88C74704BE84991640F7B8F3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1d547c493dd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/11/1A/37111A9E88C74704BE84991640F7B8F3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + +A survey of scale insects in soil samples from Europe (Hemiptera, Coccomorpha) + + + +Author + +Kaydan, Mehmet Bora + + + +Author + +Benedicty, Zsuzsanna Konczne + + + +Author + +Kiss, Balazs + + + +Author + +Szita, Eva + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +565 + + +1 +28 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.565.6877 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.565.6877 +1313-2970-565-1 +50B411DBC63F4FA48D1FC756B304FBD7 +50B411DBC63F4FA48D1FC756B304FBD7 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Hemiptera Pseudococcidae + + + +Atrococcus parvulus (Borchsenius) + + + +Material examined. + +Slovakia: 1 ♀ - Pieniny National Park, +Cerveny +Klastor +. + + + +Distribution. + +China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkey, Uzbekistan ( + +Garcia +et al. 2015 + +); Slovakia. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/11/D6/3711D68BEA8372390DA97F4273B7B2A6.xml b/data/37/11/D6/3711D68BEA8372390DA97F4273B7B2A6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b42c7e22681 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/11/D6/3711D68BEA8372390DA97F4273B7B2A6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ + + + +Taxonomic notes on the armored spiders of the families Pacullidae and Tetrablemmidae (Arachnida, Araneae) from Singapore + + + +Author + +Lin, Yucheng + + + +Author + +Koh, Joseph K. H. + + + +Author + +Koponen, Seppo + + + +Author + +Li, Shuqiang + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +661 + + +15 +60 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.661.10677 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.661.10677 +1313-2970-661-15 +7ADEBBF244A04276AB7D1EB2BBFD8953 + + + + + +Brignoliella besutensis Lin, Li & +Jaeger +, 2012 + +Figs 10, 11, 12 + + + + + +Brignoliella +besutensis + +Lin et al., 2012 +: 56, figs 1 +A-F +, 2 +A-C +, 3 +A-C +(male) from Malaysia. + + + +Material examined. + +1♂ and 8♀ (NHMSU), SINGAPORE: Pulau Ubin, altitude 2 m, +1°25'18.0"N +, +103°56'25.4"E +, 22 August 2015, S. Li and Y. Tong leg. + + + +Diagnosis. + +Brignoliella besutensis +is similar to +Brignoliella caligiformis +Tong & Li, 2008 from Hainan Island, China (see Tong, 2013: 76, fig. 91 +A-G +), but male can be distinguished by the non-inflated palpal tibia, the pear-shaped bulb, the horn-shaped embolus, and the slightly sinuous course of the spermatic duct (Fig. 11 +A-B +, also see +Lin et al., 2012 +: fig. 2 +A-C +vs. Tong, 2013: fig. 91 +F-G +). Female distinguished by the straight postgenital scutum (Fig. 12 +A-D +vs. Tong, 2013: fig. 91 +D-E +), the larger, adjacent pits of the preanal scutum (Fig. 12 +B-D +vs. Tong, 2013: fig. 91 +D-E +), the narrower lateral horn and the flatter vulval stem (Fig. 12C vs. Tong, 2013: fig. 91E). + + + + +Description +. + +Male. Coloration: body reddish-brown; legs pale reddish-brown to yellowish-brown. +Measurements: total length 1.16; carapace 0.58 long, 0.48 wide, 0.47 high; abdomen 0.72 long, 0.56 wide, 0.48 high; clypeus 0.16 high; sternum 0.32 long, 0.32 wide. Length of legs: I 1.25 (0.40, 0.14, 0.28, 0.21, 0.22); II 1.14 (0.36, 0.13, 0.25, 0.19, 0.21); III 1.01 (0.30, 0.12, 0.21, 0.19, 0.19); IV 1.29 (0.40, 0.13, 0.30, 0.26, 0.20). + +Prosoma (Fig. 10 +A-B +, E, G): carapace strongly sclerotized; cephalic part smooth, slightly raised, with two rows of wart-like knots behind ocular area; thoracic part irregularly reticulated, margin rugose and denticulate; ocular area situated anteriorly, with six eyes in three diads, PME absent, ALE>AME=PLE in eye size. Clypeus with few wart-like knots, clypeal horn short, distally bifid; chelicerae surface smooth, with a fronto-mesial, short cheliceral apophysis, cheliceral lamina developed, translucent. Endites basally wide, distally narrow; labium distally blunt, subtriangular. Sternum long same as wide, with relatively large wart-like knots, marginally crinkled. Legs with lateral veins. + + + +Figure 10. +Brignoliella besutensis +Lin, Li & +Jaeger +, 2012, male ( +A-B +, E, G) and female ( +C-D +, F, H) from Singapore. +A-D +, +G-H +habitus +E-F +prosoma. A, C dorsal B, D ventral +E-F +anterior +G-H +lateral. Scale bars: 0.10 mm. + + + +Opisthosoma (Fig. 10 +A-B +, G): dorsal scutum oval, with sparse small pits, setae inserted in pits; ventral scutum anteriorly slightly crinkled, posteriorly with pits, booklung cover smooth; lateral scutum I long; postgenital scutum present, preanal scutum rectangular and smooth. + + +Palp (Fig. 11 +A-B +): femur ventrally granulated, with three long setae; patella almost half as long as tibia, without modification; tibia slightly bent, with a distal-dorsal trichobothrium; cymbium subtriangular in lateral view; bulb pear-shaped; spermatic duct course simple; embolus short, sclerotized, distinctly narrowed and slightly bent distally, horn-shaped. + + + +Figure 11. +Brignoliella besutensis +Lin, Li & +Jaeger +, 2012, male from Singapore. A left palp, retrolateral Bditto, prolateral. Abbreviations: ep = embolic part of apes of palpal organ; sd = spermatic duct. Scale bars: 0.10 mm. + + +Female (First description). Coloration: same as in male. +Measurements: total length 1.18; carapace 0.56 long, 0.48 wide, 0.46 high; abdomen 0.84 long, 0.64 wide, 0.52 high; clypeus 0.12 high; sternum 0.33 long, 0.34 wide. Length of legs: I 1.22 (0.40, 0.14, 0.26, 0.20, 0.22); II 1.14 (0.36, 0.13, 0.24, 0.20, 0.21); III 0.98 (0.30, 0.12, 0.19, 0.20, 0.17); IV 1.26 (0.39, 0.13, 0.28, 0.24, 0.22). + +Prosoma (Fig. 10 +C-D +, F, H) as in male, but lacking clypeal horn and cheliceral apophysis, and clypeus lower than in male. Legs also as in male. + + +Opisthosoma (Figs 10 +C-D +, H; 12 +A-B +): dorsal and ventral scuta as in male; lateral scutum I short, and not exceeding anterior margin of preanal scutum; postgenital scutum straight, slightly wider than preanal scutum; preanal scutum trapezoidal, with two large grooves at anterolateral corners (Fig. 12 +A-B +). + + + +Figure 12. +Brignoliella besutensis +Lin, Li & +Jaeger +, 2012, female from Singapore. A opisthosoma B genital area (untreated) C cleared vulva (lactic acid-treated) Dditto. +A-B +, D ventral C dorsal. Abbreviations: ALG = anterolateral groove of preanal plate; AV = anterior ventrolateral plate; EF = epigynal fold; EP = epigynal pit; L = lateral plate; P = pulmonary plate; PA = preanal plate; PG = postgenital plate; SR = seminal receptaculum; VD = vulval duct; VS = vulval stem. Scale bars: 0.10 mm. + + + +Genitalia (Fig. 12 +C-D +): epigynal fold distinct; epigynal pit and vulval stem forming into a sclerotized ring; central process and inner vulval plate absent; lateral horn and vulval duct weak, connected to the translucent, saccular seminal receptaculum (Fig. 12C). + + + +Distribution. +Malaysia, Singapore. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/11/EF/3711EFC0F147E92A2EE8822E99DACA03.xml b/data/37/11/EF/3711EFC0F147E92A2EE8822E99DACA03.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..547de1ba8dc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/11/EF/3711EFC0F147E92A2EE8822E99DACA03.xml @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ + + + +A synoptic review of the ants of California (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). + + + +Author + +Ward, P. S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2005 + +936 + + +1 +68 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/21008/21008.pdf + +journal article +21008 + + + + + + +Pheidole vistana Forel +1914d + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/12/19/37121946FF8A8A15882CFBE993A0FCD8.xml b/data/37/12/19/37121946FF8A8A15882CFBE993A0FCD8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..87b82be2be5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/12/19/37121946FF8A8A15882CFBE993A0FCD8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,288 @@ + + + +A New Species Of Erlandia Aurivillius From México (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae) + + + +Author + +Noguera, Felipe A. + + + +Author + +Chemsak, John A. + +text + + +The Coleopterists Bulletin + + +2001 + +2001-09-30 + + +55 + + +3 + + +369 +373 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1649/0010-065x(2001)055[0369:ansoea]2.0.co;2 + +journal article +10.1649/0010-065X(2001)055[0369:ANSOEA]2.0.CO;2 +10102603 + + + + + + +Erlandia mexicana + + +new species + + + + + + +Fig. 1 +, + + +Description. Female. +Size small, elongate, dorsoventrally compressed; integument reddish brown, shining, apices of mandibles, anterior margin of front, genae, antennal insertions, basal and apical margins of the pronotum, margins of pro­ and mesocoxal cavities, bases and apices of femora and areas of abdominal segments black; body clothed with shining pale yellow setae. Head broader than long; mandibles robust, almost 1/3 as long as head, strongly curved at apices, internal margins without teeth; clypeus arcuate, very narrow at middle, with a fringe of reddish setae which extends to the middle of the mandibles; front short, broad, base arcuate, with a shallow, median, longitudinal depression which extends onto the vertex, each side with an impunctate area; vertex convex, longer than broad; antennal insertions contiguous with the base of the mandibles, with an small obtuse tubercle on each side at the internal apex; eyes depressed, small, moderately coarsely faceted, deeply emarginate, each lobe consisting of three rows of facets, internal margin with a semicircular crest, an oblique, ventral and dorsal crest margining the depression of the eyes and with a distinct tubercle on each side at the lower margin of the depressions; genae short, projecting down and forward, apices obtuse; dorsal punctures deep, contiguous to confluent; setae present only at the posterior part of the eyes; mentum and ligula strongly slanting; maxillary palpi + +369 + + +Fig. 1. + +Erlandia mexicana + +new species +. Female, holotype. + + + +only slightly longer than labial, apical segments two times longer than previous one, obovate elongate with apex truncate; gula longitudinally convex, with dense transverse punctures and numerous erect setae; antennae 11­segmented, scape short, subpyriform, segments 2–10 subconical, third segment shorter than first, fourth to tenth subequal and slightly longer than third, eleventh slightly longer than the first, segments 2–10 with short, subdepressed setae, segments from third with pubescent sensory patches gradually increasing in size toward apex, the last segment completely covered. Pronotum slightly broader than long, sides broadly rounded, strongly constricted near base; apical margin slightly emarginate, basal slightly curved; disk with punctures deep, contiguous to confluent, with three, glabrous, longitudinal calluses, one median and one on each side of middle, calluses extending from base almost to apex; pubescence long, erect, golden, setae more numerous at sides. Scutellum semioval, longer than wide, slightly convex transversally, almost glabrous. Elytra 2.1 times longer than broad; sides parallel; base lightly arcuate; humeri round­ ed and lightly projecting forward; apices rounded; punctures deep and contiguous; erect setae uniformly distributed. Prosternum plane, almost twice as broad as long, punctures transversely confluent, forming shallow transverse rugae, erect setae numerous, intercoxal process flat, expanded apically, coxae rounded, coxal cavities closed behind; mesosternum narrow, twice as broad as long, punctures deep and contiguous, erect setae denser at sides, intercoxal process narrow, plane, notched at apex, coxal cavities closed to epimera; metasternum a little broader than long, deeply, contiguously punctuate, erect setae denser anteriorly and at sides, metepisternum narrow, tapering posteriorly. Legs short, setae erect, sparse on femora, denser on tibiae; femora enlarged at middle, flattened, punctures sparse, fine; tibiae flattened, expanded apically, dorsal and ventral face with small asperities each bearing an erect seta; protibiae with spatulate lobe on external apical angle and a carina which extends from the base to the apex of the external margin; meso­ and metatibiae with apical margin extended distally; tarsi 0.7 times as long as tibiae, first segment slightly shorter than fourth, last one longer than second and third together. Abdomen with segments gradually decreasing in width toward apex; punctures deep, contiguous; pubescence moderately dense, long, erect; fifth sternite broadly rounded at apex. Length 12.7, width +3.4 mm +. + + +Male. +Unknown. + + +Variation. +Occasionally the lower eye lobes have four rows of facets. Length: +11.3–12.7 mm +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +This species is very distinctive and may be separated from the other known + +Erlandia + +by the coarse, dense punctures, eyes depressed and with three rows of facets on each lobe, the lateral projections below the eyes, pronotum with calluses on disc and without a median lateral tubercle and by the scutellum being longer than wide. In + +E. inopinata + +and + +E. megacephala + +the eyes are not depressed and the lower lobe is much bigger than the upper lobe, lack the projection below the eyes, the pronotum has a median lateral tubercle and the calluses on the disk are lacking and the scutellum is broader than long. In + +E. inopinata + +the vertex and disk of the pronotum are smooth with very fine punctures. + + + + +Etymology. +Named for +Mexico +, the country of origin. + + + + + + +Holotype +Female. + +Labeled: +México +: +Oaxaca +, + +23.5 km +SSE Cuicatlán + +, 17°37'.582N, 96°55'.121O, + +24­III­1998 + +, Alt. + +940 m + +, +Trampa +de luz 2, +S. Zaragoza +, +F. A. Noguera +, +A. Morales +(deposited in +Colección Nacional de Insectos +, + +Instituto +de Biología + +, +UNAM +, +México +). Two female +paratypes +with the same data except, + +20­IV­1998 + +, +S. Zaragoza +, +V +. +H. Toledo +, +F. A. Noguera +, +M. A. Morales. Two +additional female +paratypes +from +México +: +Oaxaca +, + +26 km +SSE Cuicatlán + +, 17°36'.998N, 96°55'.392O, + +25­III­1998 + +, +Alt. + +1,080 m + +, +Trampa +de luz 3, +S. Zaragoza +, +E. Ramírez +, +M. E. Guardado + +. + +Paratypes +deposited in +EBCC +and +EMEC + +. + + +Biogeographical Comments. +The presence of this species in +México +considerably extends the distribution of the Tribe +Erlandiini +in the Western Hemisphere and raises interesting biogeographical questions. The three species have been recorded only in the dry tropical communities, + +E. inopinata + +and + +E. megacephala + +in ‘‘El Chaco’’ ( +Di Iorio 1998 +) a phytogeographic region of north central +Argentina +, western +Paraguay +and the southeast of +Bolivia +( +Sarmiento 1975 +). + +E. mexicana + +new species +is found in the floristic province of the Valley of Tehuacán­Cuicatlán, which is situated in south central +México +between the states of +Puebla +and +Oaxaca +( + +Villasenor +et al. +1992 + +). Hypotheses about distribution patterns of insects in +México +indicate that the endemic fauna of the Mexican Plateau have an ancient Neotropical origin (dispersion) ( +Linsley 1961 +; +Halffter 1976 +; Kohlman and Halffter 1988) or is a remnent of tropical biotas existing in America before the separation of North and South America (vicariance) (Michener and Grimaldi 1988; +Noguera 1993 +). Under this context, +Sarmiento (1975) +has indicated that the dry tropical floras of southern South America (including ‘‘El Chaco’’) do not have a very close relationship with the flora of northern South America and that the later are more related, at least the +Cactaceae +, with the dry formations of +México +. This discontinuity supports the hypothesis of a very old divergence among these biota and that it is a result of an event of vicariance. However, stronger evidence is necessary for this to be more conclusive. A determination of the time of divergence among the species of + +Erlandia +, + +would help to support or reject either of these hypotheses or both. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/12/34/371234B5DDEC390F2A75DEF126CAD502.xml b/data/37/12/34/371234B5DDEC390F2A75DEF126CAD502.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2ec75245c54 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/12/34/371234B5DDEC390F2A75DEF126CAD502.xml @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@ + + + +A foundation monograph of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) in the New World + + + +Author + +Wood, John R. I. + + + +Author + +Munoz-Rodriguez, Pablo + + + +Author + +Williams, Bethany R. M. + + + +Author + +Scotland, Robert W. + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2020 + +143 + + +1 +823 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.143.32821 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.143.32821 +1314-2003-143-1 +F6F11A6EE4FF5A1885CEA2B60AE965A5 + + + + +51. + +Ipomoea langsdorffii +Choisy in A.P. de Candolle + +, Prodr.9 +: 368. 1845. (Choisy 1845: 368) + + + + + +Ipomoea elegans +Meisn. in Martius et al. + +, Fl. Brasil. 7 +: 244. 1869. (Meisner 1869: 244), nom. illeg., non A. Dietrich (1836: 313). Type. BRAZIL. (lectotype +J.F.Widgren +309 (BR[00000583768], designated by Wood and Scotland (2017a: 9), isolectotypes S). + + + +Ipomoea patula +var. +monticola +Meisn. in Martius et al. + +, Fl. Brasil. 7 +: 240. 1869. (Meisner 1869: 240). Type. BRAZIL. Minas Gerais, Vila Rica, +Martius +obs. 788 (holotype M[0185028]). + + + +Ipomoea monticola +(Meisn.) +O'Donell + +, Lilloa 26 +: 371. 1953. ( +O'Donell +1953a: 371). + + + +Type. + +BRAZIL. "Rio de Janeiro", +Langsdorff +(holotype P03560903 ex Herb. Richard). + + + +Description. + +Trailing perennial herb; stems asperous-hirsute, at least 80 cm long. Leaves shortly petiolate, 4-10 +x +2-4 cm, broadly oblong, less commonly ovate, apex obtuse and mucronate, base broadly cuneate to rounded, both surfaces roughly pubescent, abaxially whitish; petioles 0.6-1.6 cm, hirsute. Inflorescence of rather compact, pedunculate cymes arising in the axils of leaf-like bracts towards the apex of the stems; bracts resembling small leaves diminishing markedly in size towards the tips; peduncles 0.5-9 cm, sometimes extended to form the rhachis of a racemose inflorescence; bracteoles 12-15 mm, linear, finely acuminate, persistent, hirsute with white or reddish hairs; secondary peduncles c. 5 mm; pedicels 5-12 mm, hirsute; sepals subequal, 12-18 +x +4-5 mm, lanceolate to narrowly ovate, densely villous, outer densely brownish villous, inner paler the central hairs brownish, the marginal hairs whitish; corolla 4-5 cm long, white with dark centre, funnel-shaped, pubescent, limb c. 3-3.5 cm diam. Capsules and seeds not seen. + + + +Illustration. + +Figure +37 +. + + + +Figure 37. + +Ipomoea langsdorfii + +. +A, B +habit +C +abaxial leaf surface +D +peduncle and inflorescence +E +outer sepal +F +inner sepal +G +corolla opened out +H +ovary and style. Drawn by Rosemary Wise +A-C, E-H +from +Weddell +1912; +D +from +Clausen +s.n. + + + + +Distribution. +Apparently endemic to Minas Gerais State in Brazil, where it grows in cerrado. + +BRAZIL. Minas Gerais +: +P. Clausen +s.n. (BM); Bello Horizonte, Villa Cruzeiro do Sul, +M. Barreto +2312 (F); Betim, Contagem, Faz. do +Cabui +, +L.O. Williams +5101 (GH); San Francisco, +M. Weddell +1175 (P), 1912 (P); Serra do Itabirito, 45km SW of Belo Horizonte +H.S. Irwin et al. +19706 (FTG). + + + +Note. + +See Wood and Scotland (2017a) for a discussion of the problematic typification of + +Ipomoea patula +Choisy + +and its implications. The type location is given as "Rio de Janeiro" but this seems improbable, given that this is a cerrado species, otherwise only known from Minas Gerais. + + +This species resembles + +Ipomoea valenzuelensis + +but the leaves are whitish abaxially and never lobed, and the cymes are usually more than 3-flowered. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/12/87/371287B6EB31FF9FBCD2FD5CFB55FAFD.xml b/data/37/12/87/371287B6EB31FF9FBCD2FD5CFB55FAFD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f24c91a5fcf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/12/87/371287B6EB31FF9FBCD2FD5CFB55FAFD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,673 @@ + + + +Miliusa gokhalaei, a new species of Annonaceae from India with notes on interrelationships, population structure and conservation status + + + +Author + +Ratheesh Narayanan, M. K. +Community Agrobiodiversity Centre, M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Puthoorvayal, Kalpetta, Wayanad, Kerala - 673 121, India + + + +Author + +Anil Kumar, P. Sujanapal N. + + + +Author + +Sivadasan, M. +Department of Botany & Microbiology, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; + + + +Author + +Alfarhan, Ahmed H. +Department of Botany & Microbiology, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; + + + +Author + +Thomas, Jacob +Department of Botany & Microbiology, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2012 + +2012-12-31 + + +42 + + +26 +34 + + + +journal article +6122 +10.11646/phytotaxa.42.1.4 +32dbc22a-058b-4f84-be77-01ab35e0ce0b +1179-3163 +4928172 + + + + + + + +Miliusa gokhalaei +Ratheesh, Sujanapal, Anil Kumar & Sivadasan + +, + +sp. nov +. + +, +Figs. 1 +& +2 + + + + + + + +Miliusa indicae +et +M. eriocarpae similis +foliis petiolatis nervis pubescentibus floribus axillaribus solitariis carpellis 1- vel 2-ovularibus infundibularibus, sed foliorum basi inaequaliter rotundata floribus sessilibus vel breviter pedicellatis petalis crasse carnosis carpellis glabris antherae connectivo incluso differt. + + + + + +Type +:— + +INDIA +: +Kerala +: +Wayanad district +, Vythiri Ghat, 11 +° +30' 24.3' +N + +, + +76 +° +01' 49.1' +E +, + +490 m + +, + +26 September 2008 + +(with flowers) + +. + + +Sujanapal + +& + +Narayanan +MSSH 4312 + +( +holotype +MH +, isotypes CAbC- +MSSRF +Herbarium, Wayanad +CAL +, +CAL +, +KFRI +) + +. + + + + +Evergreen trees, to ca. +5 m +high; bark black, branches terete, drooping, young parts densely hairy. Leaves simple, alternate, 6.0–12. 0 × 2.5–4. 0 cm, oblong or obovate, glabrous, midrib pubescent below, slightly unequally rounded at base, apex caudate acuminate, subsessile or petiole to +3 mm +long, membranous; lateral nerves 10–14 pairs, intramarginal nerves sub-marginal, looping; margins entire, slightly curved, thickened. Flowers solitary, pseudo-terminal (slightly above and opposite the terminal leaf) greenish-yellow; pedicel +2–4 mm +long, glabrous; bracts two, small, ovate; bracteoles two at the base, unequal, ovate-triangular, acute, ca. +1.5 mm +long, hairy outside; sepals 3, ca. 1.5 × 2.0 mm, broadly ovate, acute, glabrous; outer petals 3, broadly ovate, acute, hairy on margins, slightly hooded, ca. 2.0 × +1.5 mm +; inner petals 3, ovate-lanceolate, 2.0–2.4 × +0.8–1.3 cm +, thick, fleshy, glabrous, thickly hooded on the lower half, cohering when young along margins, greenish-yellow with brown streaks inside; torus ovoid, long hairy; stamens many, 40–50, anthers in pairs, ca. +1 mm +, connective included; staminodes absent; anthers extrorse; carpels 10–15, linear-oblong in outline, slightly curved, ca. +2 mm +long, glabrous; stigma ovoid-acute, about half the height of the ovary, with viscous exudate; ovules 1 or 2. Fruiting stalk terete, +8–11 mm +long; monocarps usually 8–12, each +10–12 mm +across, obovoid, mammose, apex projecting, more or less obturbinate, glabrous, deep pink; stipe ca. +5 mm +long. Seeds 1-2. + + + + +Phenology:— +Flowering and fruiting occur during September to February. + + + + +Eponymy:— +The specific epithet honors Padmashree Mr. A.M. Gokhalae (IAS, Retd.), former Director of the M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai, +India +, for being a great lover of plants and plant taxonomy; he prepared a detailed electronic database for more than 7000 species of Indian angiosperms, which is one of the pioneering comprehensive efforts in digitization and digital identification of the group in +India +. + + + + +Distribution and habitat:— +Windward side of Wayanad-Silent Valley-Kodagu sub-cluster in the Nilgiri phytogeographical region of the Western Ghats. The range starts in Nadukani forests of Nilambur (Malappuram district) and extends to the Kakkayam and Thusharagiri forests of +Kozhikode +district through the evergreen forests in the western side of Wayanad Ghats. + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Miliusa gokhalaei +A. Flowering + +branch. B. Flower bud. C. Mature flower. D. Flower with petals removed. E. Sepal. F. Outer petal. G. Inner petal, ventral view. H. Inner petal, dorsal view. I. Stamen, lateral view. J. Stamen, ventral view. K. Pistil. L. Infructescence with fruits. Drawings by K. M. Manudev from living specimens. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Miliusa gokhalaei +A. Small + +twig with young flower. B. Branch with mature flower. C. Young fruit with cream-coloured monocarps. D. Mature fruit with pinkish monocarps. + + + +Evergreen forests, at elevations of ca. +400–750 m +a.s.l. are the ideal habitat of the new species. It is seen mostly along the slopes as a lower stratum tree or shrub with scandent branches. + +Arenga wightii +Griffith (1845: 475) + +is a common associate in most of its habitats. Rare, endemic and endangered species of +Annonaceae +such as + +Desmos lawii +Safford (1912: 506) + +, + +Goniothalamus wynaadensis +Beddome (1868 + +- 1874:13), + +Meiogyne ramarowii +( +Dunn1914: 183 +) +Gandhi (1976: 38) + +, + +Orophea malabarica +Sasidharan & Sivarajan (1990: 269) + +, + +Polyalthia suberosa + +( +Roxburgh 1795: 31 +.t.34) +Thwaites (1864: 398) +, + +Sageraea laurina +Dalzell (1851: 207) + +, etc. are also found in its northern distributional ranges. Endangered and economically important trees such as + +Cynometra beddomei +Prain (1897: 478) + +, + +C. travancorica +Beddome (1873: 316) + +, + +Kingiodendron pinnatum +Harms (1897: 194) + +, + +Myristica beddomei +King (1891: 291) + +, etc. are common in its habitats. + +Artabotrys zeylanicus +Hooker & Thomson (1855: 128) + +, + +Desmos lawii + +, + +Smythea bombaiensis +(Dalzell 1851: 36) +Banerjee & Mukherjee (1970: 214) + +, etc. are the woody climbers common in the habitats. In Nadukani forests a critically endangered tree species, + +Atuna indica +( +Beddome 1864: 45 +) +Kostermans (1969: 422) + +, is seen along with this new species. + + + + +Interrelationships:— + +Miliusa gokhalaei + +is similar to + +M. indica + +and + +M. eriocarpa + +in having subsessile or shortly petiolate, hairy-nerved leaves, and axillary solitary flowers, flask-shaped carpel with 1–2 ovules. However, it differs in its unequal rounded leaf bases, sessile or shortly pedicellate flowers, thick fleshy petals, glabrous carpel and included connective of anther. The other related species is + +Miliusa montana + +, and the diagnostic morphological characters of the new species and the related species are given in table 1. + + + +TABLE 1 +. Diagnostic morphological characters of + +Miliusa ghokhalaei + +sp. nov. +and related species. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Characters + + +M. gokhalaei + + + +M. indica + + +M. Montana + + +M. eriocarpa + +
HabitSmall trees, branches drooping, young parts densely hairySmall trees, branches spreading, young parts pubescentShrubs, branches spreading, young parts glabrousShrubs, branches spreading, young parts strigose
Leaf shape and sizeOblong or obovate, caudate acuminate at apex, 6.0–12.0 × 2.5– 4.0 cmOblong-elliptic or oblong- lanceolate, obtuse or acute at apex, 4.0–9.0 ×1.5–3.0 cmOvate or ovate- lanceolate, acute to shortly acuminate at apex, 5.0–7.0 × 2.0–2.7 cmElliptic-oblong to oblong-lanceolate, acute or slightly acuminate at apex, 4.5–9.0 × 2.5–2.8 cm
Position of intra- marginal looping nervesSub-marginalMarginalMarginalMarginal
PetioleGlabrous, 2–3 mm longPubescent, 1–2 mm longPubescent, 1–2 mm longTomentose, 1-2 mm long
FlowersPseudo-terminal, greenish yellowAxillary, greenLeaf-opposed, whiteAxillary, greenish pink
Pedicel2–4 mm long, glabrous, greenish3–6 mm long, glabrous, greenish0.7–1.5 cm long, glabrous, greenish2–3 mm long, pubescent, reddish
SepalsGlabrous, sub-equalPubescent outside, equalPubescent outside, equalGlabrous, sub-equal
Outer petalsOvate, hairy on marginsOvate, glabrousLinear-lanceolate, ciliateLanceolate, glabrous
Inner petals2.0–2.4 × 0.8–1.3 cm1.2–1.6 × 0.6–0.7 cm1.5–2.0 × 0.6–1.0 cm1.0–1.7 × 0.3–0.5 cm
StamensWith included connectivesWith connectives rounded apiculate at topWith connectives slightly apiculate at topWith connectives rounded apiculate at top
CarpelsLinear-oblong, glabrousLinear-oblong, densely piloseOvate, glabrousOblong, grey tomentose
MonocarpsObovoid, apex projecting, more or less obturbinate, glabrous, deep pinkOvoid or obovoid, apex acute or obtuse, silky pubescent, redSub-globose, apex obtuse, glabrous, redObliquely ellipsoid or oblong, apex apiculate, pubescent, red
+ + +Van Heusden (1992) +studied morphology and evolution of flowers in +Annonaceae +and assigned key features for + +Miliusa + +group. Based on her characterization and structure of inner petals, the southern Indian-Sri Lankan and Andamanese species of + +Miliusa + +can be broadly classified into three groups - + +Miliusa nilagirica + +group, + +Miliusa indica + +group and + +Miliusa velutina + +group. + +Miliusa nilagirica + +group is peculiar among these because of the presence of recurved petals. However, van Heusden never noticed recurved petals in + +Miliusa + +group. This group is distinct from all others of the region in having fewer stamens. The peculiarity of + +Miliusa velutina + +group is the presence of flat inner petals. + +Miliusa mukerjeeana + +is the only other member of this group. All other species belong to + +Miliusa indica + +group in having saccate, sub-saccate or pouched petals. The new species also belongs to the + +Miliusa indica + +group in having saccate petals and numerous stamens. + + + + +FIGURE 3. +Distribution of + +Miliusa gokhalaei + +in India. + + + + +Additional specimens examined +: +— + +INDIA +: +Kerala +: +Wayanad District +, +Vythiri Ghats +, 11 +° +30ʹ 24.3ʹ +N +, 76 +° +01ʹ 49.1ʹ +E +, + +490 m + +, + +30 September 2008 + +(with flowers), + +Sujanapal +& +Narayanan +MSSH 4320 +; Ibid + +., + +27 August 2009 + +, + +Sujanapal +& +Narayanan +MSSH 4388 + +(with flowers); +Malappuram District +, Nadukani Forests (Nilambur), 11 +° +29ʹ22.6ʹ +N +, 76 +° +15ʹ 19.4ʹ +E +, ± + +510 m + +, + +01 January 2009 + +, + +Sujana +MSSH 4382 + +(with fruits); +Kozhikode District +, Kakkayam Forests 11 +° +32ʹ 12.2ʹ +N +, 75 +° +55ʹ 12.2ʹ +E +, ± + +525 m + +, + +22 October 2008 + +(with flowers), + +Sujanapal +& +Narayanan +MSSH 4378 + +(with flowers); Thusharagiri Forests, 11 +° +28ʹ 12.7ʹ +N +, 76 +° +08ʹ 11.2ʹ +E +, ± + +450 m + +, + +12 October 2008 + +, + +Sujanapal +& +Narayanan +MSSH 4372 + +(Herbarium of CAbC-MSSRF, Wayanad) + +. + + + + +Population structure and conservation status:— +Populations of the new species are fragmented and seen in the lower storey, mainly along the western slopes of the Western Ghats between +400 m +and +750 m +a.s.l. in evergreen forests; they are represented by a few scattered mature individuals. There is no continuity in distribution from the southern to the northern populations. The southern-most population is located in the evergreen forests of Nadukani (Nilambur, Malappuram District). The major central population is in the Vythiri Ghats of Wayanad district and Thamarassery Ghats up to Kakkayam and Thusharagiri Range of Kozhikkode district at the northern tip. + + +In all locations, populations of this new species are small. Our observations showed that there were only nine mature individuals in a +1 km +2 +area of Nilambur. Compared to Nilambur, the population is comparatively large in Wayanad and Kozhikkode forests with more or less continuous distribution from Thamarassery up to Peruvannamuzhi. Altogether the distribution of this new species is restricted to +50 km +2 +. None of the localities is protected. The population at Nilambur is adjacent to human habitation, and waste disposal, pollution and degradation of habitat due to the nearby Sate Highway-28 are the main threats to this population. Increased anthropogenic interference in the form of firewood collection deepens the crisis. In Thamarassery Ghats the population is near to the National Highway-212, and the area is highly subject to various kinds of disturbances. The habitats in Kakkayam and Peruvannamuzhi ranges are highly disturbed due to construction activities related to two reservoirs and the forthcoming hydroelectric project. These construction activities promote calamities like landslides, soil erosion, etc. since it is lying along the sharp western slopes. By following IUCN criteria ( +IUCN, 2001 +) for assessing the status of Rare and Threatened plants, + +M. gokhalaei + +is assessed as belonging to Critically Endangered (CR) category. Its range (extent of occurrence) is less than +100 km +2 +, the population is severely fragmented and the quality of habitat is declining continuously. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/12/F9/3712F9E55700670BA84A82FD7A60B383.xml b/data/37/12/F9/3712F9E55700670BA84A82FD7A60B383.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5c0f4290d8d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/12/F9/3712F9E55700670BA84A82FD7A60B383.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part W) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +927 +927 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Waltheria americana +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 673. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Bahama, Barbiches, Surinamo." RCN: 4911. + + + + +Lectotype +(Verdoorn in +Bothalia +13: 275. 1981): Herb. Linn. No. 852.1 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Generitype +of + +Waltheria +Linnaeus + +(vide Green, +Prop. Brit. Bot. +: 172. 1929). + + + + +Current name: + + +Waltheria indica + +L. + +( +Sterculiaceae +). + + + + +Note: +St John (in +Phytologia +33: 89-92. 1976) discussed the specimens in LINN, and stated that he had studied "the types of both of the Linnaean species". However, in this he did not distinguish between 852.1 and 852.2 (LINN), which are not part of a single gathering and so Art. 9.15 does not apply. +Verdoorn's +type choice appears to be the earliest. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/13/3C/37133CC874E6E0236A6D3D43214507FA.xml b/data/37/13/3C/37133CC874E6E0236A6D3D43214507FA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c20919c8bb0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/13/3C/37133CC874E6E0236A6D3D43214507FA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ + + + +Die Milbenfauna der Nordseeinsel Wangerooge + + + +Author + +Willmann, C. + +text + + +Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Meeresforschung Bremerhaven + + +1952 + +1 + + +139 +186 + + + + +http://unknown + +journal article +ORI11037 + + + + +110. +Scutovertex minutus +(C. L. Koch 1836). + + + + +Fundorte: Sandgrube unter Steinen im +Kieferngebuesch +, 8. VI. 49 - Daselbst von Kiefern geklopft, 9. VI. 49 - Altes +Anspuelicht +von Winterhochfluten, 18. VI. 49, - Ruderalplatz am "Haus Friesland", 22. VIII. 49 - +Weideflaeche +beim Anleger-West, 18. I. 50. + + + + +Die Art ist charakteristisch +fuer +niedrige, +haeufig +austrocknende Moosrasen. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/13/3D/37133DF44E380097CB4FEA6910F4D2FE.xml b/data/37/13/3D/37133DF44E380097CB4FEA6910F4D2FE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bdad952d0e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/13/3D/37133DF44E380097CB4FEA6910F4D2FE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Texas spiders + + + +Author + +Dean, David Allen +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America +a-dean-ento@tamu.edu + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +2016-03-02 + + +570 + + +1 +703 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.570.6095 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.570.6095 +1313-2970-570-1 +CE0DA439F6F64DCF82255700A3C50098 +E376FF8EFFF1F22C326D1E0DFF8BFFDF +579094 + + + + +Mecaphesa carletonica (Dondale & Redner, 1976) + + + + +Mecaphesa carletonica +Lehtinen and Marusik 2008 +: 194 [T] + + +Misumenops carletonicus +Dondale and Redner, 1976; +Agnew et al. 1985 +: 8, 11; +Jackman 1997 +: 169 [ +Dondale and Redner 1976b +: 1007, mf, desc. (figs 1-5)] + + + +Distribution. +Erath, Hidalgo + + +Time of activity. +Male (March, June) + + +Habitat. +(orchard: grapefruit); (soil/woodland: brush, woods) + + +Method. +sweeping [m] + + +Type. +Canada, Ontario, Carleton Co., Fitzroy Township + + +Etymology. +locality (county) + + +Collection. +TAMU + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/13/5B/37135B97BFB0482B9BE0E5FA82AEEF59.xml b/data/37/13/5B/37135B97BFB0482B9BE0E5FA82AEEF59.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cf0879c82d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/13/5B/37135B97BFB0482B9BE0E5FA82AEEF59.xml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Turbo exoletus +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + +T. testa turrita: anfractibus carinis duabus obtusis distantibus. + +Bonan. recr. +3. +t. +113. + + + + +Habitat in +Europa +australi. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/13/C4/3713C44B34D4EE95E5B475278FFABCAF.xml b/data/37/13/C4/3713C44B34D4EE95E5B475278FFABCAF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..416b526e108 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/13/C4/3713C44B34D4EE95E5B475278FFABCAF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ + + + +Myrmecologische Studien. + + + +Author + +Mayr, G. + +text + + +Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien + + +1862 + +12 + + +649 +776 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/4445/4445.pdf + +journal article +4445 +DA235B82-5671-44E8-B2F3-B0440AC51542 + + + + +2 +. +A. capensis +n. sp. + + + +[[ worker ]] Laenge: 6 - 11 mm. Die grossen [[ worker ]] braeunlich schwarz, Stirnleisten, Schaftende, Geissel, Gelenke der Beine, Tarsen und Hinterleibsende rothbraun. Die kleinen [[ worker ]] dunkelbraun, Beine heller, Mandibeln, Geissel und Tarsen gelbbraun. Mandibeln grob laengsgestreift. Kopf dicht laengsgestreift, beim [[ worker ]] minor weniger regelmaessig und am Scheitel quergestreift. Thorax wie bei A. structor geformt; Pronotum oben quer-, seitlich laengsgestreift und etwas stumpfeckig erweitert. Die Knoten des Stielchens oben gerundet, beim [[ worker ]] major quergestreift, an den Seiten theilweise fein gerunzelt, beim [[ worker ]] minor nur sehr seicht gerunzelt, fast glatt und glaenzend. + + +Cap der guten Hoffnung (Novara). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/14/1A/37141A8385D00A192C8B604EA1C76215.xml b/data/37/14/1A/37141A8385D00A192C8B604EA1C76215.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..56be3dbefb0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/14/1A/37141A8385D00A192C8B604EA1C76215.xml @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + +Melanospora (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota) and its relatives + + + +Author + +Marin-Felix, Yasmina + + + +Author + +Guarro, Josep + + + +Author + +ano-Lira, Jose F. + + + +Author + +Garcia, Dania + + + +Author + +iller, Andrew N. + + + +Author + +Stchigel, Alberto M. + +text + + +MycoKeys + + +2018 + +44 + + +81 +122 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29742 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.29742 +1314-4049--81 + + + + + +Dactylidispora collipora (Stchigel & Guarro) Y. +Marin +, Stchigel, Guarro & Cano + +comb. nov. + + + + +Melanospora collipora +Stchigel & Guarro, in Stchigel, Guarro & Figueras, Mycol. Res. 101: 446. 1997. [Basionym] + + + +Notes. +This species produces ascomata with a crown of setae around the ostiole, ellipsoidal ascospores, and bulbils. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/15/28/3715281082209526691579AAF61CD8C6.xml b/data/37/15/28/3715281082209526691579AAF61CD8C6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7b855684c43 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/15/28/3715281082209526691579AAF61CD8C6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ + + + +Targeting a portion of central European spider diversity for permanent preservation + + + +Author + +Candek, Klemen + + + +Author + +Gregoric, Matjaz + + + +Author + +Kostanjsek, Rok + + + +Author + +Frick, Holger + + + +Author + +Kropf, Christian + + + +Author + +Kuntner, Matjaz + + + +Author + +Miller, Jeremy A. + + + +Author + +Hoeksema, Bert W. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2013 + +1 + + +980 +980 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e980 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e980 +1314-2828-1 + + + + +truncatus +Episinus +Theridiidae +Animalia + + + + +Episinus truncatus Latreille, 1809 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +Occurrence: recordedBy: + +Kuntner, +Gregoric +, +Candek + +; sex: +2 females +, +2 males +; Location: locationID: CH11; country: +Switzerland +; locality: +Bernese Alps, Lake Brienz +; minimumElevationInMeters: 600; maximumElevationInMeters: 600; decimalLatitude: +46.7569 +; decimalLongitude: +8.0107 +; Event: eventDate: +2011-07-10 +; habitat: meadows and forest + + + + +Type status: +Other material +Occurrence: recordedBy: + +Kuntner, +Gregoric +, +Candek + +; sex: +3 females +; Location: locationID: CH27; country: +Switzerland +; locality: +Grison Alps, road to Davos +; minimumElevationInMeters: 1180; maximumElevationInMeters: 1180; decimalLatitude: +46.6808 +; decimalLongitude: +9.6557 +; Event: eventDate: +2011-07-15 +; habitat: roadside vegetation and forest edge + + + + +Type status: +Other material +Occurrence: recordedBy: + +Kostanjsek +, +RTSB +2011 + +; sex: +1 female +; Location: locationID: SI04; country: +Slovenia +; locality: +Cerkvenjak +; minimumElevationInMeters: 230; maximumElevationInMeters: 230; decimalLatitude: +46.5641 +; decimalLongitude: +15.9863 +; Event: eventDate: +2011-07-22 +; habitat: grassland + + + + +Type status: +Other material +Occurrence: recordedBy: + +Kuntner, +Gregoric +, +Candek +, +Kralj-Fiser +, Cheng + +; sex: +1 female +; Location: locationID: SI41; country: +Slovenia +; locality: +Socerb, Osp +; minimumElevationInMeters: 116; maximumElevationInMeters: 116; decimalLatitude: +45.5819 +; decimalLongitude: +13.8558 +; Event: eventDate: +2012-06-07 +; habitat: trail from Socerb to Osp + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/15/29/3715293F34CFF1A4EF8EE0E912EE4F47.xml b/data/37/15/29/3715293F34CFF1A4EF8EE0E912EE4F47.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c3c28b99491 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/15/29/3715293F34CFF1A4EF8EE0E912EE4F47.xml @@ -0,0 +1,159 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the pelidnotine scarabs (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae, Rutelini) and annotated catalog of the species and subspecies + + + +Author + +Moore, Matthew R. +Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida Building 1881 Natural Drive Area, Steinmetz Hall, Box 110620, Gainesville, FL 32611 - 0620, USA + + + +Author + +Jameson, Mary L. +Department of Biological Sciences, Wichita State University 1845 Fairmount, Box 26, Wichita, KS 67260 - 0026, USA +maryliz.jameson@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Garner, Beulah H. +Natural History Museum, Insects Division, Department of Life Sciences, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, UK + + + +Author + +Audibert, Cedric +Musee des Confluences, Centre de Conservation et d'Etude des Collections, 13 A Rue Bancel, F- 69007 Lyon, France + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. +Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P. O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, K 1 P 6 P 4, Canada + + + +Author + +Seidel, Matthias + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +2017-04-06 + + +666 + + +1 +349 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.666.9191 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.666.9191 +1313-2970-666-1 +B3C377E8BBB14F328AECA2C22D1E625A +C43EEB41A94B930FFE439D1FAD29FF9C +579453 + + + + +Chipita mexicana (Ohaus, 1905) + + + + +Byrsopolis mexicana +Ohaus, 1905: 324-325 [original combination]. + + +Parhoplognathus mexicanus +(Ohaus) [new combination by +Ohaus 1915b +: 257]. + + +Chipita mexicana +(Ohaus) [new combination by +Soula 2008 +: 10]. + + + +Distribution. + +MEXICO: Sinaloa (FSCA), Guerrero, Jalisco, Nayarit, Oaxaca ( +Ohaus 1905 +, +1918 +, +1934b +, +Blackwelder 1944 +, +Machatschke 1972 +, + +Moron +et al. 1988 + +, + +Rodriguez-Palafox +and Corona 2002 + +, +Soula 2008 +, +Deloya et al. 2014 +). + + + +Types. + +1 ♀ lectotype and 1 paralectotype of + +Byrsopolis mexicana + +at ZMHB ( +Soula 2006 +). An exemplar specimen is figured (Fig. +7 +). + + + +Figure 7. + +Chipita mexicana + +(Ohaus) female specimen from FSCA. +A +Dorsal habitus +B +Lateral habitus. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/15/7B/37157B27C7105D2C917E193FCB97E507.xml b/data/37/15/7B/37157B27C7105D2C917E193FCB97E507.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3e31d16871f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/15/7B/37157B27C7105D2C917E193FCB97E507.xml @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ + + + +An annotated checklist of the Pyralidae of the region of Murcia (Spain) with new records, distribution and biological data (Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea, Pyralidae) + + + +Author + +Garre, Manuel J. +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain + + + +Author + +Girdley, John +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-7439 +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain + + + +Author + +Guerrero, Juan J +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain + + + +Author + +Rubio, Rosa M. +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain + + + +Author + +Ortiz, Antonio S. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-6096 +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain +aortiz@um.es + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2022 + +2022-03-14 + + +10 + + +79255 +79255 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e79255 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e79255 +1314-2828-10-e79255 +44791CDD66835E3193E35F81CF727998 + + + + +Pempelia brephiella (Staudinger, 1879) + + + +Distribution +Mediterranean-Asiatic + + +Notes + +References: + +Perez +de-Gregorio and Requena (2014) + +, +Slamka (2019) +. Biological data: Bivoltine. Flight period: II-VI, IX-XII. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/15/87/371587EB016FFF8EFF00F8DABE72FCDE.xml b/data/37/15/87/371587EB016FFF8EFF00F8DABE72FCDE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7b8a8e8308 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/15/87/371587EB016FFF8EFF00F8DABE72FCDE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,444 @@ + + + +A new species of Draconarius Ovtchinnikov, 1999 (Araneae, Amaurobioidea, Coelotinae) from Northern Pakistan + + + +Author + +Marusik, Yuri M. + + + +Author + +Ballarin, Francesco + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2739 + + +27 +32 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.203709 +d02cf857-eada-4d87-b332-7bc28b64e2ff +1175-5326 +203709 + + + + + + + +Draconarius latellai + +n. sp. + + + + +Figs 1–12 +, + + + + + +Type +material + +. +Holotype +3 ( +MSNV +) +PAKISTAN +, Northern Areas [= Gilgit-Baltistan administrative unit], Gilgit Dist., Bagrot Valley, Burche Glacier, +36°00'19.8''N +74°32'28.4''E +, +27.10.2008 +(L. Latella). +Paratypes +: 2ƤƤ ( +MSNV +), Northern Areas, Gilgit Dist., Naltar Valley, +36°11'2.4''N +74°9'12.7''E +, +1.11.2008 +(L. Latella, R. Ahmed). + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is a patronym in honour of the collector of the +holotype +, Italian coleopterologist Leonardo Latella (Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona). + + + + +FIGURES 1–6. +Male palp of + +Draconarius latellai + + +n. sp. + +1—retrolateral; 2—ventral; 3—ventro-prolateral; 4—retrolateral; 5— prolateral; 6—scheme, course of embolus in ventral view. Abbreviations: +Cf +—cymbial furrow, +Co +—conductor, +Em +—embolus, +Pa +—patella, +Ta +—tegular (=median) apophysis. + + + + +FIGURES 7–12. +Habitus and epigyne of + +Draconarius latellai + + +n. sp. + +7, 8—habitus of male and female, respectively; 9, 11— epigyne, ventral; 10—epigyne, anterior; 12—epigyne, dorsal; 10–12—epigyne after maceration; +Ag +—accessorial glands, +Eh +—hoods, +Et +—epigynal tooth; +Id +—insemination ducts, +Ps +—posterior sclerotized strip; +Sp — +spermatheca. + + + + +Diagnosis +. The new species belongs to the + +D. venustus + +species group, which encompasses over 25 species (see +Wang, 2003 +) and is most similar to the +type +species of the genus ( + +D. venustus +Ovtchinnikov, 1999 + +). + +Draconarius venustus + +and the new species are distinguished from other + +Draconarius + +by having the longest insemination duct, which consists of at least seven coils ( +Figs 11–12 +, +16–17 +); further distinguished from most + +Draconarius + +species in having no distinct pattern on carapace or abdomen ( +Figs 7–8 +). The new species is distinguished from + +D. venustus + +by its round spermatheca ( +Figs 11–12 +; elongate in + +D. venustus + +Fig. 17 +), longer patellar apophysis ( +Fig. 4 +; compare with +Figs 14–15 +), shorter embolus ( +Fig. 3 +; compare with +Figs 13–15 +), and longer tip of cymbium ( +Fig. 3 +; compare with +Figs 13–15 +). In addition, the upper part of the conductor is rounded in new species, whereas in + +D. venustus + +it is angled ( +Fig. 14 +). Of the remaining species described from Central Asia, the new species differs from + +D. pakistanicus + +by having longer embolus reaching base of tibia ( +Figs 1–6 +; compare with +Figs 18–19 +) and cymbial furrow ( +Fig. 1 +; compare with +Figs 18–19 +), and also by having more numerous coils of insemination ducts (over seven in the new species, four in + +D. pakistanicus + +); from + +D. naranensis + +(known from the male only) by having smaller epigynal teeth terminating over the fovea (large and terminate below fovea + +D. naranensis + +) and also by having more coils of the insemination duct (three in + +D. naranensis + +; +Fig. 23 +). Differences between + +D. latellai + + +n. sp. + +species and three other Central Asian species are summarized in the key. + + + + +Description. +Male. Total length 8.4. Carapace: 4.4 long, 2.9 wide, uniformly coloured. Eyes sizes and distances: AME 0.14, ALE 0.20, PME 0.15, PLE 0.12, AME-AME 0.07, AME-ALE 0.05, PME-PME 0.10, PME- PLE 0.17, AME-PME 0.14. Abdomen 4.1 long, 2.25 wide. Light brown, without distinct pattern on carapace and abdomen ( +Figs 7–8 +). Abdomen with distinct heart mark which is darker than other parts of abdomen ( +Fig. 8 +). + + + +FIGURES 13–23. +Copulatory organs of + +Draconarius venustus + +(13–17), + +D. pakistanicus + +(18–21) and + +D. naranensis + +(22–23). 13—male palp, prolateral; 14, 19—male palp, ventral; 15, 19—male palp, retrolateral; 16, 20, 22—epigyne, ventral; 17, 21, 23—epigyne, dorsal. 13–17—after Ovtchinnikov (1999), reproduced with permission; 18–23—after Ovtchinnikov & Inayatullah (2005), reproduced with permission. +Et +—epigynal tooth; +Ft +—finger like tip of cymbium; +Sp — +spermatheca; arrows indicate differences in position of embolic loop. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Leg measurements:
Femur PatellaTibiaMetatarsusTarsusTotal
I 3.9 1.554.34.22.216.15
II 3.9 1.53.83.852.215.25
III 3.65 1.453.354.052.0514,55
IV 4.9 1.454.555.552.4518.90
+ + +Palp as in +Figs 1–5 +, femur short, its length is about 2/3 of cymbial length; patella as long as wide, with long spiniform apophysis ( +Pa +), its length is equal to 2/3 of patella length; tibia with small lateral apophysis and with keel like RTA, both apophyses forming kind of furrow; cymbium large, cymbial furrow ( +Cf +) very long, it occupying 88% of the cymbial length; tegular (=median) apophysis ( +Ta +) large, almost as long as patella; conductor ( +Co +) trilobate as in other congeners; embolus ( +Em +) long and thin, making several coils in different planes. + +Female. Total length 8.75–9.5. Carapace 3.15–3.35 long, 2.0–2.6 wide. Eye sizes and distances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.17, PME 0.14, PLE 0.15, AME-AME 0.05, AME-ALE 0.04, PME-PME 0.10, PME-PLE 0.12, AME-PME 0.10. Abdomen 5.2–5.7 long, 2.95–3.35 wide. Coloration as in male. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Leg measurement:
Femur PatellaTibiaMetatarsusTarsusTotal length
I 2.55 1.22.32.11.359.50
II 2.25 1.11.951.91.228.42
III 2.1 1.11.6221.17.92
IV 2.85 1.22.673.051.411.17
+ + +Epigyne as in +Figs 9–12 +, fovea transverse (wider than high), posterior part with thin sclerotized strip ( +Ps +); teeth ( +Tt +) almost invisible, two conical invaginations (hoods) clearly visible on the internal side of the epigynal plate ( +Eh +); insemination ducts ( +Id +) coiled, they making at least 8 coils; spermatheca round; accessory glands ( +Ag +) thin, placed over insemination ducts. + + + + +Comments. + +Draconarius venustus + +and the new species have the longest insemination ducts in the genus. It seems that long ducts do not correspond to long emboli. Several + +Draconarius + +species have an embolus longer than in + +D +. +latellai + + +n. sp. + +( + +D. venustus + +, + +D. longissimus +Liu, +Li & Pham, 2010 + +), but they have insemination ducts as long as in + +D +. +latellai + + +n. sp. + +or shorter. + + + + +Distribution +. The new species was found in two localities about +50 km +apart in northern Kashmir. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/16/3C/37163C4D7A38645100EF58D2D5C7D760.xml b/data/37/16/3C/37163C4D7A38645100EF58D2D5C7D760.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e688a8c6edf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/16/3C/37163C4D7A38645100EF58D2D5C7D760.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Subtribe +Amorphosomatina Majer, 2000 + + + + +Amorphosomina +Majer, 2000: 210 [stem: Amorphosomat-]. Type genus: +Amorphosoma +Laporte, 1835. Comment: incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/16/FA/3716FAF9EC1C05AD8C1A38C8FC30E9B7.xml b/data/37/16/FA/3716FAF9EC1C05AD8C1A38C8FC30E9B7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2f10c5a8292 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/16/FA/3716FAF9EC1C05AD8C1A38C8FC30E9B7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ + + + +Order Soricomorpha + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +220 +311 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Crocidura lasiura +Dobson 1890 + + + + + + + +Crocidura lasiura +Dobson 1890 + +, +Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 6, 5: 31 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +NE +China +, (Manchuria), Ussuri River. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Ussuri White-toothed Shrew +. + + + + +Synonyms: + +Crocidura campuslincolnensis +Sowerby 1945 + +; + +Crocidura lasiura +Giglioli and Salvadori 1887 + +; + +Crocidura lizenkani +Kishida 1931 + +; + +Crocidura neglecta +Kuroda 1934 + +; + +Crocidura sodyi +Kuroda 1935 + +; + +Crocidura thomasi +Sowerby 1917 + +; + +Crocidura yamashinai +Kuroda 1934 + +. + + + + +Distribution: +Ussuri Region ( +Russia +) and NE +China +to +Korea +; Kiangsu ( +China +). Range mapped by +Zaitsev (1993) +and +Jiang and Hoffmann (2001) +. + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +– Lower Risk (lc). + + + + +Discussion: +Karyotype has 2n = 40, FN = 56 ( +Zima et al., 1998 +). For synonyms see +Corbet (1978c:29) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/16/FF/3716FFDE7D663144E9A4973205813B07.xml b/data/37/16/FF/3716FFDE7D663144E9A4973205813B07.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..187f21cc7ea --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/16/FF/3716FFDE7D663144E9A4973205813B07.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Sawflies, ' Symphyta' + + + +Author + +Liston, Andrew D. + + + +Author + +Knight, Guy T. + + + +Author + +Sheppard, David A. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1168 +1168 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 +1314-2828-2-1168 + + + + +Dineura testaceipes (Klug, 1816) + + + + +Tenthredo testaceipes +Klug, 1816 + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/17/01/37170195A4CC99B560A2D5410DDA97CC.xml b/data/37/17/01/37170195A4CC99B560A2D5410DDA97CC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..df78fb4e367 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/17/01/37170195A4CC99B560A2D5410DDA97CC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ + + + +Revision of the Afrotropical Mayrellinae (Cynipoidea, Liopteridae), with the first record of Paramblynotus from Madagascar + + + +Author + +Noort, Simon van +Natural History Department, Iziko South African Museum, PO Box 61, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa & Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch, 7701 +svannoort@iziko.org.za + + + +Author + +Buffington, Matthew L. +Systematic Entomology Lab, USDA, c / o Smithsonian NMNH, 10 th & Constitution Ave NW, Washington DC 20013 + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2013 + +2013-03-13 + + +31 + + +1 +64 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.31.4072 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.31.4072 +1314-2607-31-1 +DFD1344DFCA642CDBD684FDF2E73F9AC +4869FFA3084EFFC9FFC2FFB1FFD64E2A +574813 + + + + +Paramblynotus alexandriensis Buffington & van Noort +sp. n. +Figures 13 + + + +Type material. + +HOLOTYPE. +Female: +South Africa +, [first label] Alexandria, Cape Province, 22.2.1962, ACC. PE 857; [second label] with Curculionid in log of + +Ptaeroxylon obliquum + +; [third label] (Hym. +Cynipoidea +, +Mesocynipinae +) + +Paramblynotus + +Cameron, 1908, sp., det. Michael Soderlund, 1994; [fourth label] red holotype label (SANC). +PARATYPES. +3F: Same data as holotype. Deposited in SANC, SAMC, and USNM. + + + +Distribution. +South Africa. + + +Etymology. +Named after the Alexandria Forest, which now forms part of the Greater Addo Elephant National Park. + + +Diagnosis. + +Belongs to the + +Paramblynotus trisetosus + +clade within the + +Paramblynotus trisetosus + +species-group of +Liu et al. (2007) +. Female with 13 segmented antennae; male unknown. Ocellar plate present, mound-like; occiput concave in dorsal view. Mesoscutum deeply foveate, notaulices complete ( +Fig. 13D +); upper mesopleuron entirely smooth, glabrous ( +Fig. 13C +). T6 largest, T8 slightly exposed ( +Fig. 13F +). Wings clear, no banding present ( +Fig. 13A +). Most similar to + +Paramblynotus fuscapiculus + +, but distinguished by: the coloration of the female flagellum (terminal segment dark in + +Paramblynotus alexandriensis + +( +Fig. 13A +); terminal two segments dark in + +Paramblynotus fuscapiculus + +); and setation of T9: in + +Paramblynotus alexandriensis + +, a dense brush of setae is present ( +Fig. 13F +); in + +Paramblynotus fuscapiculus + +, T9 is glabrous or with only very short, appressed setae. + + + +Description. + +FEMALE. Length 2-2.5 mm. Head, mesosoma and metasoma dark brown; antennae and legs light yellow; terminal segment of antennae dark brown ( +Fig. 13A +) +. +Wings transparent ( +Fig. 13A +). Entire head with the exception of the genae and occiput strongly pubescent ( +Fig. 13E +). Eyes prominent, bulbous, but not laterally extended much beyond outer margin of genae in anterior view ( +Fig. 13E +). Antenna 13 segmented; F1 shorter than F2; flagellum not widening toward apex. Vertex foveate, distinct carinae absent; ocellar plate not raised; ocelli large, their diameter as great as distance between lateral and median ocellus ( +Fig. 13D +). Face punctate-rugose, humped between toruli and clypeal margin, protruding in lateral view; antennal scrobe +mostly +smooth with minute punctuation. Weakly keeled medial carina present between toruli extending towards median ocellus ( +Fig. 13E +). Occiput concave in dorsal view, smooth without a carina. Lower face with strong excavations (with weak vertical carinae) defining upper clypeal margin, and containing anterior tentorial pits ( +Fig. 13E +). Clypeus gently strigate. Genae with distinct foveae along eye margin, punctate-rugose and densely pubescent between these foveae and genal carina ( +Fig. 13C +). Mesosoma strongly pubescent. Single submedian pronotal depression present. Anterior plate of pronotum puberulous. Pronotum dorsomedially with swollen rim without any crest. Lateral carinae of pronotum strong, fading dorsomedially. Lateral surface of pronotum foveate ( +Fig. 13C +). Dorsal pronotal area smooth with minute punctures. Mesoscutum deeply foveate, setose; notaulices complete, extending to anterior margin of mesocutum; median mesoscutal impression absent ( +Fig. 13D +). The two scutellar foveae each with three subcarina creating a transverse row of 8 longitudinally elongate subfoveae. Scutellum medially foveate, sparsely setose, peripherally areolate-punctate ( +Fig. 13D +). Posterior mesoscutum and scutellum contiguously rounded in lateral view. Mesopleural triangle defined without ventral curved carina, strongly pubescent; upper mesopleuron glabrous, smooth, anteriorly and ventrally pubescent with minute punctures; median longitudinal impression percurrent with evenly spaced transverse carinae; speculum glabrous, smooth ( +Fig. 13C +). + + +Metanotal-propodeal complex strongly excavated, excavations bordered by strong carinae. Metepisternum dorsally excavated with pubescence, medially polished with indications of minor rugose remnants, ventrally pubescent. Dorsellum with two strong medial foveae; laterally strongly excavated with fine pubescence in lateral depressions. Lateral propodeal carina present; median longitudinal propodeal carina well-defined, crossed by wrinkled transverse and longitudinal carinae extending onto nucha. Rs+M of forewing defined, but nebulous where it arises from basal vein at posterior third ( +Fig. 13A +). Marginal cell 2.5 times as long as wide. Abdominal petiole short, longitudinally striate, 0.5 times as long as wide in dorsal view ( +Fig. 13C +). Posterior ventral margin of metasomal T7 gently sinuate ( +Fig. 13F +). T8 well exposed, with a patch of scattered long setae posteriorly ( +Fig. 13F +). Ventral portions of T2-T7 covered by sternum 3. Tergites dorsally finely punctate; laterally and ventrally polished. All legs sparsely punctuate, strongly pubescent, except metacoxae dorsally glabrous, smooth ( +Fig. 13F +). Mesotibial outer spur shorter than inner spur; metatibial spurs subequal in length. Ratio of first metatarsomere to the remaining 4 metatarsomeres combined: 0.67. + +MALE. Unknown. + + +Figure 13. + +Paramblynotus alexandriensis + +sp. n., holotype female. +A +lateral habitus +B +dorsal habitus +C +head and mesosoma, lateral view +D +head and mesosoma, dorsal view +E +head, anterior view +F +metasoma, lateral view. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/17/14/3717146088296940A49089398796AE7E.xml b/data/37/17/14/3717146088296940A49089398796AE7E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..09c68bf68f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/17/14/3717146088296940A49089398796AE7E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 1. Pteridophyta bis Caryophyllaceae (2 nd edition): Registerzuband 1 + + + +Author + +Hess, Hans Ernst + + + +Author + +Landolt, Elias + + + +Author + +Hirzel, Rosmarie + +text + +1972 +Birkhaeuser Verlag + + +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291815 + +book +291815 +10.5281/zenodo.291815 +3-7643-0843-5 + + + +<subSubSection id="0AB90773348310DEEB05F4E06A2DE652" pageId="null" pageNumber="358" type="nomenclature"> +<paragraph id="91ED4B76830AFECE976385F792318EF8" pageId="null" pageNumber="358"> +<taxonomicName id="EB9A951F3EBB03861764F2CD00B14990" ID-CoL="6HTXM" ID-ENA="116553" authority="(Hackel) Kerner" class="Liliopsida" family="Poaceae" genus="Festuca" kingdom="Plantae" order="Poales" pageId="null" pageNumber="358" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="rupicaprina"> +Festuca +<normalizedToken id="D78E9CB1418E58F73B89CBB8C2F0A6A5" originalValue="rupicaprína" pageId="null" pageNumber="358">rupicaprina</normalizedToken> +(Hackel) Kerner +</taxonomicName> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="81F209AEC5E07C34025856680EAF15D5" pageId="null" pageNumber="358" type="vernacular_names"> +<paragraph id="BE37B31191AB134CDA87DB95ED74FD05" pageId="null" pageNumber="358">Gemsen-Schwingel</paragraph> +</subSubSection> + + + +10-20 cm hoch. + +Blaetter +0,5-0,7 mm dick, mit 3 oder 5, selten 7 Nerven und 3 +duennen +Straengen +von Festigungsgewebe. + +Bluetenstand +(Traube oder Rispe) 1,5-3 cm lang. Obere +Huellspelze +3,5-4,5 mm lang. Deckspelzen begrannt; +Granne weniger als +1/2 + +so lang wie die +zugehoerige +Spelze. + +Staubbeutel 2-3 mm lang. - +Bluete +: Sommer. + + +Zytologische Angaben. 2n = 14: +Material aus botanischen +Gaerten +(Brandberg 1949). +2n = 28: +Material aus botanischen +Gaerten +( +Staehlin +1929). + + +Standort. +Subalpin und alpin. Offener, kalkhaltiger, feiner bis grober Schutt an steilen +Haengen +. Oft zusammen mit + +Trisetum distichophyllum + +und + +Thlaspi rotundifolium +. + + + +Verbreitung. Ostalpen-Pflanze +: Von den Schweizer Alpen (Wallis) +ostwaerts +. - Im Gebiet: Alpen (in den Urgesteinsketten nicht vorhanden; Westgrenze der Verbreitung nicht genau bekannt); ziemlich verbreitet. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/17/21/37172144230E53B58F7DFB44D92587C0.xml b/data/37/17/21/37172144230E53B58F7DFB44D92587C0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2168faf5c67 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/17/21/37172144230E53B58F7DFB44D92587C0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,491 @@ + + + +Revision of the Chironius bicarinatus complex (Serpentes: Colubridae): Redefined species boundaries and description of a new species + + + +Author + +Sudre, Vinicius +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1909-1112 +Departamento de Vertebrados, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, 20940 - 040, Sao Cristovao, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil +viniciussudre@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Andrade-Junior, Albedi +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0577-6313 +Departamento de Vertebrados, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, 20940 - 040, Sao Cristovao, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Folly, Manuella +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5353-3906 +Departamento de Vertebrados, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, 20940 - 040, Sao Cristovao, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Azevedo, Josue A. R. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-2670 +Coordenacao de Biodiversidade, Programa de Colecoes Cientificas Biologicas, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil + + + +Author + +Avila, Robson Waldemar +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3641-8321 +Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Ceara, Campus do Pici, Bloco 906, Av. Mister Hull, 60440 - 900, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil + + + +Author + +Curcio, Felipe Franco +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1200-5354 +Departamento de Biologia e Zoologia, Instituto de Biociencias, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Av. Fernando Correa da Costa, 2367, 78060 - 900, Cuiaba, Mato Grosso, Brazil + + + +Author + +Nunes, Pedro M. Sales +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2635-9703 +Departamento de Zoologia, Centro de Biociencias, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Professor Moraes Rego, 1235, Cidade Universitaria, 50670 - 901, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil + + + +Author + +Passos, Paulo +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1775-0970 +Departamento de Vertebrados, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, 20940 - 040, Sao Cristovao, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + +text + + +Vertebrate Zoology + + +2024 + +2024-01-23 + + +74 + + +85 +120 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/vz.74.e106238 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/vz.74.e106238 +2625-8498-74-85 +D576F215864F4961BA1E01824BB54B36 +634CEC8AD5ED51DAA5E3535AEE905B09 + + + + +Chironius bicarinatus (Wied, 1820) + + + + +Figures 6A, B +, 7A +, 8 + + + +Chresonymy. + +Coluber bicarinatus +Wied, 1820: 179; +Wied (1824 +: Vol. 8), (1825: 284). On a sand beach of Lagoa, near the Rio +Jucu +, within "5 legoas" (leagues) of Villa do +Espirito +Santo (currently Vila Velha), state of +Espirito +Santo, Brazil. + + +Natrix bicarinatus +- +Merrem (1820 +: 117) + + +Erpetodryas bicarinatus +- +Boie (1826 +: 237) + + +Herpetodryas bicarinatus +- +Wagler (1830 +: 180) + + +Herpetodryas bicarinata +- +Fitzinger (1843 +: 26) + + +Herpetodryas carinatus +(not Linnaeus, 1758) - +Schlegel (1837 +: 177, in part), +Dumeril +et al. (1854: 207, in part), +Jan (1863 +: 80, in part), +Boulenger (1894 +: 73 [var. C], in part) + + +Herpetodryas carinatus var. bicarinata +- +Boettger (1898 +: 55, in part) + + +Chironius carinatus +(not Linnaeus, 1758) - +Amaral (1925 +: 4, in part) + + +Chironius bicarinatus +- +Bailey (1955 +: 8, in part), +Peters and Orejas-Miranda (1970 +: 59, in part), +Dixon et al. (1993 +: 59, in part), +Entiauspe-Neto et al. (2020 +, in part) + + + +Holotype. + +Adult male, apparently lost in the American Museum of Natural History ( +Vanzolini and Myers 2015 +) from a locality near Lagoa Grande ( +20°30'08.3″S +, +40°21'32.4″W +; ~2 m above sea level; hereafter a.s.l.), municipality of Vila Velha, state of +Espirito +Santo, Brazil. The data reported by Wied in the original description and in later studies ( +Wied 1824 +: color plate, Vol. 8 plate 2; 1825: 284) are adequate for the recognition of the species and its type locality, with the designation of a neotype being deemed unnecessary ( +ICZN 1999 +). + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Chironius bicarinatus + +is distinguished from all congeners by the following unique combination of morphological characters: (i) dorsal scale rows 12/12/10; (ii) cloacal plate divided; (iii) dorsal scale rows keeled usually two; (iv) ventrals 147-170 in females, 145-165 in males; (v) subcaudals 130-157 in females, 125-154 in males; (vi) apical pits often present only on the cervical region; (vii) three supralabials contacting orbit; (viii) temporal formula usually 1+2; (ix) after preservation, uniform olive, grayish olive or bluish dorsum with a light vertebral stripe; (x) after preservation, labials predominantly yellowish, except for the last two or three supralabials, which may present the same color of dorsal series or postocular stripe; gular region, first third of belly, and subcaudals yellowish; remainder of the belly yellowish or bluish; (xi) a medially positioned black zig-zag line between subcaudals, gradually fading to the tip of the tail; outer margins with a black outline; (xii) hemipenial body generally ornamented with papillate calyces gradually replaced by smooth calyces toward the apex; (xiii) hemipenial body with each longitudinal row presenting 14-22 spines and 5-7 spines along sulcus spermaticus; (xiv) ventral surface of the septomaxilla smooth; (xv) anteroventral surface of prefrontal lacrimal foramen smooth; (xvi) maxillary teeth 30-38; (xvii) palatine teeth 23-24; (xviii) quadrate-suspensorium articulation with posterior end of supratemporals straight. + + + +Comparisons. + + +Chironius bicarinatus + +differs from most congeners, except for + +C. multiventris + +Schmidt & Walker, 1943, + +C. foveatus + +, + +C. septentrionalis + +Dixon et al., 1993 +, +Chironius cf. exoletus +, and + +C. gouveai + +, by having 12/12/10 dorsal scale rows, divided cloacal plate, two keeled dorsal scale rows, presence of apical pits, and a greenish or olive dorsal pattern. + +Chironius bicarinatus + +differs from + +C. multiventris + +, + +C. foveatus + +and + +C. septentrionalis + +in its number of subcaudals 125-157 [138.7-142.0; 95% confidence intervals, hereafter] (vs. 156-208 in + +C. multiventris + +, 156-169 in + +C. foveatus + +and 165-181 in + +C. septentrionalis + +) and ventrals 145-170 [156.2, 157.4] (vs. 161-196 in + +C. multiventris + +, 163-174 in + +C. foveatus + +and 161-174 in + +C. septentrionalis + +). + + +The Atlantic populations of +Chironius cf. exoletus +(in parentheses) are the only ones that can present the aforementioned characters and a color pattern similar to + +C. bicarinatus + +. Specimens of +Chironius cf. exoletus +that have 12/12/10 dorsal scale rows are seldom observed (2% in our sample, with 12/12/8 being more frequent). Still, + +C. bicarinatus + +can also be differentiated by the number of maxillary teeth 30-38 [33.8-34.4] (vs. 23-31); outer margins of subcaudals pigmented black (vs. black pigmentation absent); ventral color pattern of tail usually with a black zig-zag line medially between subcaudals, gradually fading to the tip of the tail (vs. black zig-zag line maintaining the same intensity up to the tip of the tail); and hemipenial body elongated covered with more concentrated spines (vs. hemipenial body short with lower concentration of spines; see an illustration of the hemipenes in the supplementary information S1 of Klackzo et al. 2014). + + + +Chironius bicarinatus + +differs from + +C. gouveai + +(in parentheses) in the number of ventrals 147-170 [157.0-159.0] in females and 145-165 [155.1-156.6] in males (vs. 156-174 [162.8-164.8] in females and 151-167 [157.9-159.3] in males); maxillary teeth 30-38 [33.8-34.4] (vs. 27-36 [30.5-31.4]); color pattern in preservative with uniformly olive, grayish olive or bluish dorsum and a black zig-zag line medially between subcaudals, gradually fading to the tip of tail (vs. dorsum usually uniform light brown, grayish olive or bluish, and dorsal and ventral scales with black or brown edges without a zig-zag line; see +Entiauspe-Neto et al. 2020 +: fig. 3 for an illustration of this character); temporal formula usually 1+2 (vs. 1+1); ventral surface of septomaxilla smooth (vs. presence of a conspicuous projection); anteroventral surface of prefrontal lacrimal foramen smooth (vs. presence of a conspicuous projection); and posterior end of supratemporals straight (vs. slightly laterally curved). + + + +Color pattern variation in preservative. +Adult specimens with uniformly olive, grayish olive or bluish dorsum and light vertebral and postocular stripes that may or may not be evident, sometimes with black outer margins bordering it, more visible on the anterior part of the body. Predominantly pale yellowish labials, except for the last two or three supralabials, which may present the same dorsal or postocular stripe color. Ventrally, gular region, first third of the belly, and subcaudals pale yellowish; the remainder of the belly pale yellowish or bluish. Most have outer subcaudal margins with a black outline and a medially positioned black zig-zag line between subcaudals (gradually fading to the tip of the tail), which may vary in intensity and may even be absent in some specimens. Juvenile specimens have the same color pattern variation as adults, but they can also have a uniform olive brown dorsum and light crossbands on dorsum. In our sample, the presence of light crossbands on dorsum was found in juvenile specimens with a maximum SVL of 373 mm (CHUFJF 523) and in only one adult specimen (MNRJ 1839, SVL 830 mm), collected in the municipality of Passa Quatro, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. + + +Color pattern while alive (Fig. 6A, B). +The description of color pattern while alive is based on photographs of six adult specimens (MNRJ 19138, 22017, 23571, 24194, 24877, 26255), and a juvenile specimen (MNRJ 27463), all collected in several localities of the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; as well as on photographic material of other unvouchered specimens (iNaturalist, n = 9; see Appendix 2). Adult specimens have a uniformly green, olive or grayish olive dorsum with a light vertebral, sometimes with black outer margins bordering it, more visible on the anterior part of the body, and a black postocular stripe. Predominantly yellowish supralabials, except for the last two or three, which may present the same dorsal or postocular stripe color. Infralabials and gular region mostly whitish or yellowish; the first third of belly and subcaudals yellowish; the remainder of the belly whitish yellow. As in preserved specimens, while alive juvenile specimens also have a uniform olive brown dorsum and light crossbands on dorsum. + + +Figure 6. +General view while alive of + +Chironius bicarinatus + +and + +Chironius gouveai + +: +A +an adult of + +C. bicarinatus + +(MNRJ 26255) from the municipality of Rio Claro, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; +B +a juvenile specimen of + +C. bicarinatus + +(MNRJ 27463), from the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; +C +an adult specimen of + +C. gouveai + +(unvouchered specimen) from the municipality of Porto Alegre, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; +D +a juvenile specimen of + +C. gouveai + +(unvouchered specimen) from the municipality of Vacaria, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Photos by M. Bilate (A), F. Dias-Silva (B), M. Borges-Martins (C), and O.L. Balbinot (D). + + + + +Hemipenial morphology (Fig. 7A). + +We analyzed the hemipenes of 23 specimens of + +Chironius bicarinatus + +, five of which were extracted from the specimens and manually fully everted, rendering almost or virtually maximally expanded organs. The description of hemipenes is based on the fully everted and maximally expanded left organs of the specimens MNRJ 4008, 25558, and also on the partially expanded organs of specimens MNRJ 8717, 25434; and the maximally expanded right organ of the specimen MNRJ 18909. Hemipenis unilobed, unicalyculate, noncapitate; subcylindrical shape, with a simple sulcus spermaticus, running centripetally from the base to the apex (MNRJ 4008) or slightly more than half of the hemipenis (MNRJ 25434); apex may present a nude area (MNRJ 25558) or may not (MNRJ 18909), generally with papillate calyces, but can also present calyces with few papillae on the apex and medial region (MNRJ 18909, 25558); each longitudinal row presenting 21-29 calyces; the calyces towards the hemipenial body are replaced by spinulate calyces; hemipenial body represents more than half of the total length of the organ, and is covered in spines that gradually increase in size toward the base, reaching maximum size at just over half of hemipenial body; each longitudinal row presenting 14-22 spines and 5-7 spines along sulcus; base mostly nude, ornamented by spinules at the upper portion and also laterally distributed on the proximal region of sulcus spermaticus; a basal naked pocket is present on the medial region. + + + +Figure 7. +Hemipenial morphology of + +Chironius bicarinatus + +and + +Chironius gouveai + +: +A +asulcate (left) and sulcate (right) views of the hemipenis of + +C. bicarinatus + +(MNRJ 25558) from the municipality of +Petropolis +, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; +B +asulcate (left) and sulcate (right) views of the hemipenis of + +C. gouveai + +(MHNCI 12369) from the municipality of +Candoi +, state of +Parana +, Brazil. Scale bar = 5 mm. + + + + +Distribution (Fig. 8). + + +Chironius bicarinatus + +is distributed in the Ombrophilous Dense and Semideciduous Forests along the coast, from the +Sao +Francisco River, state of Sergipe, Northeastern Brazil (northernmost record in the municipality of Capela; +10°32′S +, +37°03′W +), to the Serra do Tabuleiro, state of Santa Catarina, Southern Brazil (southernmost record in the municipality of +Florianopolis +; +27°35′38.5″S +, +48°32′54.0″W +) between sea level to ~930 m a.s.l.. + + + +Figure 8. +Distribution of the + +Chironius bicarinatus + +complex ( +A +), based on first-hand examined and photographic records with locality data: + +C. bicarinatus + +: blue circles; + +C. gouveai + +: purple circles; + +C. dracomaris + +sp. nov. +: orange circles. The stars represent their respective type localities; +B +zoomed map of the +Baturite +Massif, an area of distribution of + +Chironius dracomaris + +sp. nov. +; +B +, +C +zoomed maps of molecular sampling localities, with the new sequences obtained in this study (highlighted in red) and sequences selected from GenBank. + + + + +Remarks. + +The records of + +Chironius bicarinatus + +(ZVC 1336, MNHN 3924) in Montevideo, Uruguay, can be explained by the accidental introduction of specimens into the agricultural market of Montevideo by banana shipments from the state of +Sao +Paulo, Brazil ( +Carreira and Maneyro 2013 +). Strangely, two records of + +C. bicarinatus + +(CHUFC 3604, MZFS 1279) were reported from the municipalities of Mulungu and Juazeiro, respectively in the states of +Ceara +and Bahia. Similarly, we believe it is more likely that these records are also due to accidental introduction by banana shipments from the Bahia coastal region than that the representation of small, well-established populations above the +Sao +Francisco River. Possible evidence of this would be the northernmost records of + +C. bicarinatus + +(NMB 1303, 1304) reported by +Dixon et al. (1993) +, further inland in the state of Bahia, municipality of +Andarai +. We verified these records in the +Institution's +catalog, which contained the following data: "BRA Bahia Andarahy pequeno> Andahary pequeno" donated by "Massini, Hans, Rio de Janeiro". Thus, we can conclude that it is more likely that these records are from a location in the state of Rio de Janeiro, known as Tijuca (formerly known as +Andarai +Pequeno), since the donor was a resident of this neighborhood. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/17/A1/3717A13BB9A09890137DB69D9F3060C5.xml b/data/37/17/A1/3717A13BB9A09890137DB69D9F3060C5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c53356eae94 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/17/A1/3717A13BB9A09890137DB69D9F3060C5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ + + + +A revision of the Oriental species of Bolitogyrus Chevrolat (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Staphylininae) + + + +Author + +Brunke, Adam J. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +664 + + +1 +97 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.664.11881 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.664.11881 +1313-2970-664-1 +C86AA26D022948D8A36E5BBBE871F7EA +C86AA26D022948D8A36E5BBBE871F7EA + + + + +Bolitogyrus nanus Brunke +sp. n. +Fig. 17 +K-L +, 20C (map) + + + + +Type +locality. + +Mawsynram-Balat Road, Khasi Hills, Meghalaya, India. + + +Type material. + +Holotype (♂, MHNG): INDIA, Meghalaya, Khasi Hills, 1000m, Mawsynram-Balat, +Besuchet-Loebl +, 27.X.78, [1978] [printed] / +Cyrtothorax +spec. det. M. Uhlig 1982 [written] / +Cyrtothorax vulneratus +Smetana det. 1986 [written] / HOLOTYPE +Bolitogyrus nanus +Brunke, des. A. Brunke 2017 [red label] / AJB0000431 [identifier label]. + + + +Diagnosis. + +This species can be distinguished by the following character states: head entirely dark; elytral disc dark with pale markings extending halfway to epipleural margin (Fig. 5G); pronotal margin at its widest point no more than three lateral puncture widths wide but still distinctly expanded at hind angles; forebody less than four millimeters; apex of median lobe with double-toothed carina or +'lip' +(Fig. 17L); paramere with only simple rows of peg setae and without dense field (Fig. 17K). + + + +Description. +Measurements ♂ (n = 1): HW/HL 1.40; PW/PL 1.29; EW/ EL 1.23; ESut/PL 0.84; PW/HW 1.01; forebody length 3.5 mm. + +Extremely similar to +B. khasiensis +and differing only in the following: medial and lateral elytral markings more broadly connected, pale area of epipleuron not restricted to humeral spot, pale in up to entire basal half; pronotum slightly more transverse; elytral suture relatively longer than pronotum at middle; forebody distinctly shorter and thinner; median lobe in parameral view with apex distinctly acuminate and acute, apex with folded, double-tooted carina (Fig. 17L); paramere with sparse and simple rows of peg setae placed close to margin, removed from margin only at base of rows (Fig. 17K). Female unknown. + + + +Distribution. +Figure 20C. Known only from the Khasi Hills of Meghalaya. + + +Bionomics. +The holotype was collected in October at 1000 m. + + +Etymology. +The species epithet refers to the fact that this species is the smallest known in the Oriental fauna at 3.5 millimeters in forebody length. + + +Comments. + +Bolitogyrus nanus +is extremely similar to allopatric +B. himalayicus +from West Bengal but is slightly smaller and the apex of the median lobe bears a double-toothed carina and the paramere lacks the dense apical field of peg setae. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/18/47/371847843FA54D3AE3EDAF5B005EF164.xml b/data/37/18/47/371847843FA54D3AE3EDAF5B005EF164.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..49967b70c6f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/18/47/371847843FA54D3AE3EDAF5B005EF164.xml @@ -0,0 +1,263 @@ + + + +Flora of Cameroon - Annonaceae Vol 45 + + + +Author + +Couvreur, Thomas L. P. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8509-6587 +IRD, DIADE, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France & Universite de Yaounde I, Ecole Normale Superieure, Departement des Sciences Biologiques, Laboratoire de Botanique systematique et d'Ecologie, B. P. 047, Yaounde, Cameroon & Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Botany Section, Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR Leiden, Netherlands +thomas.couvreur@ird.fr + + + +Author + +Dagallier, Leo-Paul M. J. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3270-1544 +IRD, DIADE, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Crozier, Francoise +IRD, DIADE, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Ghogue, Jean-Paul +Universite de Yaounde I, Ecole Normale Superieure, Departement des Sciences Biologiques, Laboratoire de Botanique systematique et d'Ecologie, B. P. 047, Yaounde, Cameroon & Green Connexion, Environmental Group, siege face GP Melen, a cote de l'immeuble Palais des verres. Yaounde, Cameroun + + + +Author + +Hoekstra, Paul H. +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Botany Section, Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Kamdem, Narcisse G. +Universite de Yaounde I, Ecole Normale Superieure, Departement des Sciences Biologiques, Laboratoire de Botanique systematique et d'Ecologie, B. P. 047, Yaounde, Cameroon + + + +Author + +Johnson, David M. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2896-7419 +Department of Botany-Microbiology, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, OH, 43015, USA + + + +Author + +Murray, Nancy A. +Department of Botany-Microbiology, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, OH, 43015, USA + + + +Author + +Sonke, Bonaventure +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4310-3603 +Universite de Yaounde I, Ecole Normale Superieure, Departement des Sciences Biologiques, Laboratoire de Botanique systematique et d'Ecologie, B. P. 047, Yaounde, Cameroon + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2022 + +2022-09-20 + + +207 + + +1 +532 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.207.61432 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.207.61432 +1314-2003-207-1 +29CD4EF8FB525DBAA022DF25CDB649C9 + + + + +Monanthotaxis tripetala P.H.Hoekstra, PhytoKeys 69: 96, 2016 + + + + +Figs 70 +, 71 +; Map 9C + + + + +Type +. + + + +Cameroon +. +East Region +; +15 km +E of +Dimako +, village halfway +Bertoua-Doume +, + +Leeuwenberg A.J.M. +5828 + +, +11 Jun 1965 +: +holotype +: WAG [WAG0110801, WAG0110802]; isotypes: B[B100190273]; BR[BR0000014126253]; C; EA; K; LISC; MO; P[P01967268]; PRE; YA + +. + + + +Description. + +Liana, 3 m tall, d.b.h. to 11 cm. Indumentum of simple hairs; old leafless branches glabrescent, young foliate branches pubescent with very short appressed reddish brown hairs 0.1 mm long. Leaves: petiole 2-8 mm long, 1-2 mm in diameter, pubescent, blade inserted on the side of the petiole; blade 4.2-16.2 cm long, 1.8-5.3 cm wide, oblong to elliptic, apex acuminate to acute, acumen 0.5-1 cm long, base rounded, subcoriaceous, below sparsely pubescent when young, glabrous when old, above sparsely pubescent to glabrous when young and old, discolorous, whitish below; midrib impressed, above sparsely pubescent when young, glabrous when old, below pubescent when young, sparsely pubescent when old; secondary veins 7 to 10 pairs, glabrous above; tertiary venation percurrent +. Individuals bisexual; inflorescences ramiflorous on old leafless branches, axillary. +Flowers with 6 to 7 perianth parts in 2 to 3 whorls, 1 to 2 per inflorescence, peduncle 0-6 mm long, pubescent; pedicel 12-20 mm long, 0.5 mm in diameter, pubescent; in fruit 16-29 mm long, ca. 2 mm in diameter; basal bract not seen; upper bracts ca. 1 mm long, ca. 0.5 mm wide; sepals 3, valvate, free, ca. 1 mm long, ca. 1 mm wide, ovate, apex obtuse, base truncate, densely pubescent outside, glabrous inside, margins flat; petals free, outer petals longer than inner (when present), inner petals entirely covered in bud; +outer petals 3, 2-2.2 mm long +, ca. 2.2 mm wide, broadly ovate to circular, apex rounded to obtuse, base truncate, margins flat, pubescent outside, pubescent inside; +inner petals absent or more rarely 1 minute, ca. 1.5 mm long +, ca. 0.5-0.6 mm wide, elliptic, apex acute, base truncate, margins flat, pubescent outside, pubescent and glabrous towards the base inside; stamens 9 to 12, in 1 row, ca. 1 mm long, linear to clavate; connective reduced, slightly acute, glabrous; staminodes absent; carpels free, 9, ovary ca. 1 mm long, stigma flat, glabrous. Monocarps stipitate, stipes 7-22 mm long, ca. 2 mm in diameter; monocarps up to 7, 110-130 mm long, 8-9 mm in diameter, moniliform, ellipsoid, apex apiculate, sparsely pubescent to glabrous, verrucose, constricted around seeds when more than 1, yellow when ripe; seeds 1 to 4 per monocarp, ca. 17 mm long, ca. 7 mm in diameter, ellipsoid; aril absent. + + + +Distribution. +A Central African species, from Cameroon to Gabon, in Cameroon known from the East region. + + +Habitat. +A rare species, known from a single collection in Cameroon; in lowland primary or secondary rain forests, on hillsides. Altitude ~650 m a.s.l. + + +Local and common names known in Cameroon. +None recorded. + + +Preliminary IUCN conservation status. + +Endangered (EN) ( +Hoekstra et al. 2021 +). + + + +Uses in Cameroon. +None reported. + + +Notes. + + +Monanthotaxis tripetala + +is distinguished by the small axillary bisexual flowers, of which the inner petals are highly reduced or absent. The latter character also occurs in the male flowers of + +Monanthotaxis cauliflora + +and + +M. diclina + +, but those have unisexual flowers. + + + +Figure 70. + +Monanthotaxis tripetala + +A +flowering branch +B +leaf base abaxially +C +leaf base and inflorescence +D +flower with one petal removed +E +petal inner side view +F +flower with petals removed +G +stamen outer side view +H +stamen inner side view +I +stamen side view +J +carpel +A-J +from +Leeuwenberg 5828 +. Drawings by Hans de Vries ( +Hoekstra et al. 2021 +, fig. 30, p. 201). + + + + +Figure 71. + +Monanthotaxis tripetala + +A +habit, juvenile +B +leaf, lower side +C +base of leaf blade, upper side +D +base of leaf blade, lower side. + +Monanthotaxis vulcanica + +E +base of leaf blade, lower side +F +habit, juvenile +G +base of leaf blade, upper side +A-D +Couvreur 870 +, Gabon +E-G +Couvreur 1049 +, Mt Cameroon, Cameroon. Photos Thomas L.P. Couvreur. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/18/58/3718581DA18E23FF9C8F5EBCE105D282.xml b/data/37/18/58/3718581DA18E23FF9C8F5EBCE105D282.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..af4853270c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/18/58/3718581DA18E23FF9C8F5EBCE105D282.xml @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ + + + +New records and detailed distribution and abundance of selected arthropod species collected between 1999 and 2011 in Azorean native forests + + + +Author + +Borges, Paulo A. V. + + + +Author + +Gaspar, Clara + + + +Author + +Crespo, Luis Carlos Fonseca + + + +Author + +Rigal, Francois + + + +Author + +Cardoso, Pedro + + + +Author + +Pereira, Fernando + + + +Author + +Rego, Carla + + + +Author + +Amorim, Isabel R. + + + +Author + +Melo, Catarina + + + +Author + +Aguiar, Carlos + + + +Author + +Andre, Genage + + + +Author + +Mendonca, Enesima P. + + + +Author + +Ribeiro, Servio + + + +Author + +Hortal, Joaquin + + + +Author + +Santos, Ana M. C. + + + +Author + +Barcelos, Luis + + + +Author + +Enghoff, Henrik + + + +Author + +Mahnert, Volker + + + +Author + +Pita, Margarida T. + + + +Author + +Ribes, Jordi + + + +Author + +Baz, Arturo + + + +Author + +Sousa, Antonio B. + + + +Author + +Vieira, Virgilio + + + +Author + +Wunderlich, Joerg + + + +Author + +Parmakelis, Aristeidis + + + +Author + +Whittaker, Robert J. + + + +Author + +Quartau, Jose Alberto + + + +Author + +Serrano, Artur R. M. + + + +Author + +Triantis, Kostas A. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +10948 +10948 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 +1314-2828-4-10948 + + + + +Micrurapteryx bistrigella (Rebel, 1940) + + + +Ecological interactions + +Native status +Azores endemic + + + +Distribution +FLO; PIC; SJG; TER* + + +Notes +Biogeographical Realm: Western Palearctic (Macaronesia) + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/18/A7/3718A7F881B65685345D9FCD5B5D0A8C.xml b/data/37/18/A7/3718A7F881B65685345D9FCD5B5D0A8C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d694aa0857d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/18/A7/3718A7F881B65685345D9FCD5B5D0A8C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ + + + +The ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Strandzha Mountain and adjacent coastal territories (Bulgaria and Turkey) + + + +Author + +Kostova, Rumyana + + + +Author + +Gueorguiev, Borislav + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8135 +8135 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8135 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8135 +1314-2828-4-8135 + + + + +Pterostichus (Bothriopterus) quadrifoveolatus Letzner, 1852 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Primorsko, bay of Stamopolu +; Record Level: bibliographicCitation: Wrase (1991: 8) + + +Type status: +Other material +. Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Primorsko, bay of Stamopolu +; Record Level: bibliographicCitation: +Gueorguiev +& +Gueorguiev +(1995: 125) + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/18/F2/3718F2B5BC37B256B165A4594365D1C1.xml b/data/37/18/F2/3718F2B5BC37B256B165A4594365D1C1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..75aeb955b22 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/18/F2/3718F2B5BC37B256B165A4594365D1C1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part C) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +370 +473 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Cliffortia polygonifolia +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 1038. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Aethiopia." RCN: 7496. + + + +Lectotype +(Stearn, + +Introd. +Linnaeus' +Sp. Pl. + +(Ray Soc. ed.): 47. 1957): [icon] " + +Cliffortia +foliis linearibus pilosis + +: +Femina +" in Linnaeus, Hort. Cliff.: 501, t. 32. 1738. - Voucher: + +Herb. Clifford: 501, + +Cliffortia + +3 ( +BM +) + +. + + + + +Generitype +of + +Cliffortia +Linnaeus + +(vide Green, +Prop. Brit. Bot. +: 192. 1929). + + + + +Current name: + + +Cliffortia polygonifolia + +L. + +( +Rosaceae +). + + + + +Note: +Oliver & Fellingham (in Jarvis & al., +Regnum Veg. +127: 35. 1993) designated a Clifford sheet as +lectotype +, but this choice is pre-dated by that of Stearn. Weimarck ( +Monogr +: +Cliffortia +: 83. 1934) noted the +Hort. Cliff. +illustration as "a good figure" adding "the type specimen has disappeared". + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/19/06/3719063D5AE8529DA6EC5768C468A65F.xml b/data/37/19/06/3719063D5AE8529DA6EC5768C468A65F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..704d3d14feb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/19/06/3719063D5AE8529DA6EC5768C468A65F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ + + + +Moss inhabiting flea beetles of the West Indies III: Erinaceialtica, a new genus from Hispaniola (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae, Alticini) + + + +Author + +Konstantinov, Alexander S. +Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA, c / o Smithsonian Institution, P. O. Box 37012, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA +alex.konstantinov@ars.usda.gov + + + +Author + +Linzmeier, Adelita M. +Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Rua Edmundo Gaievski, 1000, P. O. Box 253, 85.770 - 000, Realeza, PR, Brazil +alinzmeier@yahoo.com.br + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +955 + + +113 +145 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.955.53644 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.955.53644 +1313-2970-955-113 +A1F7219FA232450B88A29E63237BB4F9 +403AF19A6F345ECEAF984A2B9C170133 + + + + +Erinaceialtica rileyi +sp. nov. +Figs 46-47 +, 48-51 +, Map 1 + + + +Description. + +Body length 2.10-2.54 mm, width 1.18-1.40 mm. Vertex and part of head below vertex including frons and antennal calli black with dark greenish to blueish tint. Antennomere 11 slightly lighter than 9. Base of pronotum dark yellow, slightly lighter in color than apex. Antebasal pronotal impression absent. Elytral disc black to dark brown with dark greenish to blueish tint. Some spots on elytron appear black in part because elytral surface darker, in part because it is covered with dark setae. In dorsal view dark spots are: one spot lateral to scutellum, two spots down posteriorly near suture, and two more on posterior slope; one spot on humeral callus, two spots behind each other on lateral slope near middle, and another spot directly below it towards posterior. Elytra laterally and towards apex also appear darker. Ventral side of body dark brown, except last abdominal segment being lighter in color. Pro- and mesofemora and pro- and mesotibiae brown, with slightly lighter area on tibiae. Metafemora dark, with bronzy shine. Metatibia uniformly brown to dark amber in color. Setae on orbit and vertex whitish, denser and more vivid on orbit, directed ventrally. Setae on middle of vertex short, directed towards middle, not forming a small +"mohawk" +. Pronotal setae more erect, directed laterally and posteriorly. Second row on punctures on elytral slope not impressed with setae directed laterally and ventrally from it. Median lobe of aedeagus narrows gradually from middle to apex in ventral view with wide apex. + + + +Figures 46, 47. +Adult + +Erinaceialtica rileyi + +sp. nov. +46 +habitus, dorsal view, male +47 +habitus, dorsal view, female. + + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Erinaceialtica rileyi + +has unique color and can be easily identified using the key at the end of the paper. + + + +Figures 48-51. +Adult + +Erinaceialtica rileyi + +48 +habitus, three quarter view, male +49 +median lobe of aedeagus, ventral and lateral views +50 +habitus, frontal view, male +51 +habitus, frontal view, female. + + + + +Habitat. +Unknown. + + +Etymology. + +The species epithet, +rileyi +, is a patronym in honor of Ed Riley, who contributed greatly to our knowledge of diversity and taxonomy of +Chrysomelidae +in the United States and the New World in general. + + + +Type material examined. + +Holotype, male: 1) Dom. Rep.: LaVega 19 km E El Rio Aug 3, 1979, C.W. +O'Brien +(USNM). Paratype, female, with the same labels as holotype (ERPC). + +Paratype, male: Dominican Republic, La Vega, Estacion Cabanito 20 July 1996, R. Turnbow; 2) Reserva Cientifica Ebano Verde (ERPC). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/19/39/3719393943317F477857ED8AC3DCA345.xml b/data/37/19/39/3719393943317F477857ED8AC3DCA345.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ae739039626 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/19/39/3719393943317F477857ED8AC3DCA345.xml @@ -0,0 +1,248 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Cricetidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +955 +1189 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + + +Oligoryzomys fulvescens +(Saussure 1860) + + + + + + + +[Oligoryzomys] fulvescens +(Saussure 1860) + +, +Rev. Mag. Zool. Paris, ser. 2, 12: 102 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +México +, +Veracruz State +, Orizaba (as restricted by + +Merriam, 1901 +a +:295 + +) + +. + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Fulvous Colilargo +. + + + + +Synonyms: + +Oligoryzomys costaricensis +(J. A. Allen 1893) + +; + +Oligoryzomys delicatus +(J. A. Allen and Chapman 1897) + +; + +Oligoryzomys fulvescens +(Saussure 1860) + +; + +Oligoryzomys engraciae +( +Osgood 1945 +) + +; + +Oligoryzomys lenis +(Goldman 1915) + +; + +Oligoryzomys mayensis +( +Goldman 1918 +) + +; + +Oligoryzomys messorius +(Thomas 1901) + +; + +Oligoryzomys munchiquensis +(J. A. Allen 1912) + +; + +Oligoryzomys navus +(Bangs 1899) + +; + +Oligoryzomys nicaraguae +(J. A. +Allen 1910 +) + +; + +Oligoryzomys pacificus +( +Hooper 1952 +) + +; + +Oligoryzomys tenuipes +(J. A. Allen 1904) + +. + + + + +Distribution: +W and E versants of S +México +, through Central America, to +Ecuador +, N and C +Venezuela +, Guianas, and northernmost +Brazil +in South America. + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +– Lower Risk (lc). + + + + +Discussion: +All Middle American forms retained as subspecies by some (see +Hall, 1981 +; +Jones and Engstrom, 1986 +). Morphometric variation among Middle American forms evaluated by +Carleton and Musser (1995) +and their morphology contrasted with + +O. vegetus + +. Reported karyotypic variation intimates that more than one species occurs among the listed synonyms ( + +Andrades-Miranda et al., 2001 +a + +; +Gardner and Patton, 1976 +; +Haiduk et al., 1979 +), whose status, particularly the South American taxa provisionally associated by +Carleton and Musser (1995) +, warrants additional study. +Linares (1998) +, e.g., recognized all Venezuelan populations (except + +O. griseolus + +) as + +O. fulvescens + +; whereas, + +Andrades-Miranda et al. (2001 +a +) + +listed specimens from +Roraima +, +Brazil +, as + +O +. cf. +messorius + +, a form described from +Guyana +; and see Voss et al. (2001) for another regional perspective regarding discrimination and specific assignment of Guianan samples vis a vis lowland populations in Middle America ( + +O. fulvescens + +) and N +Brazil +( + +O. microtis + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1A/3D/371A3D598AF6CA1B8C72079BCCC159F1.xml b/data/37/1A/3D/371A3D598AF6CA1B8C72079BCCC159F1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..33eaaa4411c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1A/3D/371A3D598AF6CA1B8C72079BCCC159F1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ + + + +Order Chiroptera - Family Phyllostomidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +395 +426 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Mesophylla macconnelli +subsp. +macconnelli +Thomas 1901 + + + + + + + +Mesophylla macconnelli +subsp. +macconnelli +Thomas 1901 + +, +Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, 8: 145 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +Guyana +, +Essequibo +Dist., Kanuku Mtns. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1A/74/371A74FD703A897FA09CA9A176D5B4C3.xml b/data/37/1A/74/371A74FD703A897FA09CA9A176D5B4C3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c011f988ecf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1A/74/371A74FD703A897FA09CA9A176D5B4C3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ + + + +Ameisen aus Rhodesia, Kapland usw. (Hym.) Gesammelt von Herrn G. Arnold, Dr. H. Brauns und anderen. + + + +Author + +Forel, A. + +text + + +Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift + + +1913 + +1913 + + +203 +225 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/4059/4059.pdf + +journal article +4059 +501AECAA-BC7F-4DE8-8A8C-90FED0E21463 + + + + +Triglyphothrix auropunctatus For. v. rhodesiana +n. v. + + + +[[ queen ]]. L.: 3,6 — 4 mm. Dunkler als der Arttypus, dunkelbraun. Stirn, Wangen, Kiefer, Fuehler, Beine und Querbinden am Hinterteil des Hinterleibes gelbroetlich. Kopf hinten weniger ausgerandet und vorn staerker verschmaelert. Der erste Knoten ist seitlich mehr gerundet und vor allem der zweite Knoten anders geformt, seitlich stumpf konisch zugespitzt, oben weniger breit, mehr eine stumpfe Querkante bildend, sonst wie der Arttypus. Bembesi, Sued-Rhodesia (Arnold). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1A/7C/371A7C679F53503B89B6035C3BBE187D.xml b/data/37/1A/7C/371A7C679F53503B89B6035C3BBE187D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7d876b463d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1A/7C/371A7C679F53503B89B6035C3BBE187D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ + + + +A nomenclator of extant and fossil taxa of the Melanopsidae (Gastropoda, Cerithioidea) + + + +Author + +Neubauer, Thomas A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-9941 +Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria +thomas.neubauer@nhm-wien.ac.at + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +2016-07-05 + + +602 + + +1 +358 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 +1313-2970-602-1 +65EFA27673454AC69B78DBE7E98D6103 +FFA86D39FFE2FFF3FF8AFFEBC209FFDE +126863 + + + + +" +Melanopsis lucio " mentioned in Erber (1868: 904) +[unavailable] + + + +Locality. + +"Rhodus" +[Rhodes island, no locality indicated], Greece. + + + +Remarks. + +Nomen nudum. Erber attributed the authority to Mousson. Given as " + +Luciae + +" in +Paetel (1888) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1A/E4/371AE49D4A1F60620876D2F610E87BD4.xml b/data/37/1A/E4/371AE49D4A1F60620876D2F610E87BD4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b36efe458c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1A/E4/371AE49D4A1F60620876D2F610E87BD4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part S) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +806 +877 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Saxifraga cernua +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +1 + +: 403. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Alpibus Lapponicis frequens." RCN: 3164. + + + + +Lectotype +(Siplivinsky in +Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. +14: 108. 1977): Herb. Linn. No. 575.44 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + + +Saxifraga cernua + +L. + +( +Saxifragaceae +). + + + + +Note: +Webb (in +Bot. J. Linn. Soc. +95: 264. 1987), evidently unaware of +Siplivinsky's +earlier choice, independently designated the same type. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1A/EA/371AEA6899F4385349DF8A9251A1234D.xml b/data/37/1A/EA/371AEA6899F4385349DF8A9251A1234D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5e49b2cfb26 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1A/EA/371AEA6899F4385349DF8A9251A1234D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +bousquety1@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-11-28 + + +245 + + +1 +1722 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 +1313-2970-245-1 +FFFF52503A0AFF882450FFB66D45FF8E +578462 + + + + +Stenocrepis elegans (LeConte, 1851) + + + + +Oodes elegans +LeConte, 1851: 180. Type locality: "ad fluminis Gilae ripas, circa Pimas [Arizona]" (original citation). Lectotype (♂), designated by Bousquet (1996a: 495), in MCZ [# 76]. + + + +Distribution. +This species ranges from southwestern California to eastern Arizona, south along the Gulf of California to Nayarit [see Bousquet 1996a: map 17]. A few specimens simply labeled from New Mexico and Texas are known. + + +Records. + +USA +: AZ, CA [NM, TX] - Mexico + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1B/1F/371B1F348C2AD345C8B4662E63F3EE79.xml b/data/37/1B/1F/371B1F348C2AD345C8B4662E63F3EE79.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9a8e5991998 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1B/1F/371B1F348C2AD345C8B4662E63F3EE79.xml @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ + + + +Polychaetes of Greece: an updated and annotated checklist + + + +Author + +Faulwetter, Sarah + + + +Author + +Simboura, Nomiki + + + +Author + +Katsiaras, Nikolaos + + + +Author + +Chatzigeorgiou, Giorgos + + + +Author + +Arvanitidis, Christos + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2017 + +5 + + +20997 +20997 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 +1314-2828-5-20997 + + + + +Aricidea (Acmira) cerrutii Laubier, 1966 + + + + +Aricidea (Acmira) cerrutii +Laubier, 1966 | +Aricidea cerrutii +Laubier, 1966 | +Aricidea jeffreysii +(McIntosh, 1879) [sensu Cerruti / sensu Fauvel] | +Paraonis paucibranchiata +Cerruti, 1909 + + + +Notes + +Aricidea jeffreysii +sensu Cerruti, 1909 (non McIntosh, 1879), on which the description and illustrations of +Fauvel (1927) +are based, was referred to +Aricidea (Acmira) cerrutii +by +Laubier (1967) +. +Paraonis paucibranciata +is considered a juvenile form by +Strelzov (1973) +who placed it into synonymy with +Aricidea (Acmira) cerrutii +. However, +Paraonis paucibranchiata +in this case would have nomenclatural priority over +Aricidea cerrutii +- an issue which is not resolved here. Type locality: Mediterranean ( +Alberes +, France). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1B/82/371B829503F04F14241F705F72239642.xml b/data/37/1B/82/371B829503F04F14241F705F72239642.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ef40ad55173 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1B/82/371B829503F04F14241F705F72239642.xml @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + +H. Sauter's Formosa-Ausbeute: Formicidae (Hym.). + + + +Author + +Forel, A. + +text + + +Entomologische Mitteilungen + + +1912 + +1 + + +45 +81 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/4035/4035.pdf + +journal article +4035 + + + + +Myrmecina Sauteri +n. sp. + + + +[[worker]] L. 2 bis 2,2 mm. Kiefer glatt, kaum punktiert, undeutlich 6-7 zaehnig. Kopf rechteckig, deutlich etwas laenger als. breit, mit sehr schwach konvexen Seiten, vorn so breit als hinten, mit etwas konkavem Hinterrand. Die sehr kleinen Augen liegen etwas vor der Mitte und bestehen aus etwa 6 bis 10 Fazetten. Der sehr kurze Clypeus hat zwei nach vorn umgebogene kurze Laengsleisten und einen geraden Vorderrand mit zwei Ecken. Stirnleisten sehr kurz. Der Fuehlerschaft erreicht nicht ganz den Hinterhauptrand. Erstes Geisselglied dicker als lang; Glieder zwei bis acht dreimal so dick als lang. Thorax kuerz, vorn breit, hinten schmal, Pronotum mit scharfen Ecken, so breit vorn als der Kopf hinten. Mesonotum ohne Zahn; Basalflaeche des Epinotums mit zwei recht kleinen, aber ziemlich scharfen Seitenzaehnchen und hinten mit zwei laengeren, spitzen Zaehnen oder sehr kurzen Dornen, die nur wenig laenger sind als an der Basis breit. Abschuessige Flaeche konkav, scharf, kantig gerandet. Erstes Stielchenglied quadratisch, zweites breiter als lang. +Kopf ziemlich glaenzend, grob und sehr unregelmaessig genetzt, Thorax glaenzend, grob laengsgerunzelt bis genetzt. Stielchenknoten und Vorderhaelfte des Hinterleibes dicht genetzt und schimmernd. Hintere Haelfte des Hinterleibes, Beine, Mitte der Stirne vorn und abschuessige Epinotumflaeche ziemlich glatt. Fuehlerschaft gerunzelt; auch am Stielchen einige groebere Runzelstuecke Abstehende Behaarung gelblich, fein, spitz, kurz, ueberall maessig zerstreut, auch an den Schienen und am Fuehlerschaft. Pubeszenz fast fehlend. +Kopf und Thorax oben, sowie der Hinterleib schwarzbraun. Oberseite der Knoten braeunlich. Kiefer, Glieder, Unterseite und Vorderrand des Kopfes, Stirnleisten, Unterseite des Thorax und des Stielchens gelbrot. Hinterleibsspitze gelblich. +[[queen]] L. 2,6 mm. Mesonotum hinten laengsgerunzelt, vorn glatt. Epinotum vorn ohne Seitenzaehnchen. Sonst ganz wie der [[worker]]. Fluegel fehlen. + + +Pilam. + + + +Von +transversa Em. +und +opaciventris Em. +verschieden; ebenso von der 3,5 mm langen +striata Em. +und von der +sulcata Em. +, die lange Dornen hat. Kleiner als +undulata Em. +, mit laengerem Kopf; ganz andere Skulptur und Kopfform als +brevicornis Em +. +Rugosa Forel +hat lange Dornen und einen viel breiteren Kopf, ist auch groesser. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1B/EC/371BEC046330D100F05EA069CDBDE107.xml b/data/37/1B/EC/371BEC046330D100F05EA069CDBDE107.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c5fa4864f31 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1B/EC/371BEC046330D100F05EA069CDBDE107.xml @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ + + + +A catalogue of the fishes held in the Istanbul University, Science Faculty, Hydrobiology Museum. + + + +Author + +Nurettin Meriç + + + +Author + +Lütfiye Eryilmaz + + + +Author + +Müfit Özulug + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2007 + +1472 + + +29 +54 + + + + +http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:428F3980-C1B8-45FF-812E-0F4847AF6786 + +journal article +z01472p029 + + + + +Liza carinata (Valenciennes, 1836) + + + + + +Mediterranean Sea +: +32700-885 +(1 spc.), + +16.11.2005 + +, +Yumurtalik Bay +, +C. Dalyan + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1C/4B/371C4BD14E815044B79D3881764584A4.xml b/data/37/1C/4B/371C4BD14E815044B79D3881764584A4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..47a1cd72c8e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1C/4B/371C4BD14E815044B79D3881764584A4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + +Orthopteroid insects (Mantodea, Blattodea, Dermaptera, Phasmoptera, Orthoptera) of agrocenosis of rice fields in Kyzylorda oblast, South Kazakhstan + + + +Author + +Temreshev, Izbasar I. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0004-4399 +LLP " Educational Research Scientific and Production Center " Bayserke-Agro "", Almaty oblast, Panfilov district, Arkabay village, Otegen Batyr street, 3, Kazakhstan +temreshev76@mail.ru + + + +Author + +Makezhanov, Arman M. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-3425 +LLP " Educational Research Scientific and Production Center " Bayserke-Agro "", Almaty oblast, Panfilov district, Arkabay village, Otegen Batyr street, 3, Kazakhstan + +text + + +Acta Biologica Sibirica + + +2020 + +2020-09-16 + + +6 + + +229 +247 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/abs.6.e54139 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/abs.6.e54139 +2412-1908-6-229 +EF2D667774E142979A1881336E53FFD6 +66A40CDA532A5943AE540741B560E3B9 + + + + +Oxya fuscovittata (Marschall, 1836) + + + +Material examined. + +12 L1, 10 L2, 14 L3, +17.05.2018 +, KO, neig. v. Abay, PF Akzhol, rice field edge, IT; 15 L2, 25 L3, 22 L4, 9 L5, 24- +26.05.2018 +, KO, neig. v. Abay, PF Akzhol, rice field edge, IT, +AM +; +2 males +, +3 females +, +24.06.2019 +, KO, Shieli d., PF Akmaya, rice field edge, IT, +AM +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1C/66/371C667B07713B8E2E89CA46C52DFE8F.xml b/data/37/1C/66/371C667B07713B8E2E89CA46C52DFE8F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..badbbb91021 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1C/66/371C667B07713B8E2E89CA46C52DFE8F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ + + + +A revision of the Australian digger wasps in the genus Sphex (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae) + + + +Author + +Doerfel, Thorleif H. + + + +Author + +Ohl, Michael + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +521 + + +1 +104 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.521.5995 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.521.5995 +1313-2970-521-1 +805ABD44DDDA4AA39923022B2E908525 + + + + +Taxon +classification Animalia Hymenoptera Sphecidae + + + + +Sphex gilberti R. Turner, 1908 + + + + +Sphex gilberti +R. Turner, 1908: 468, ♀. Holotype or syntypes: ♀, Australia: Queensland: Mackay (BMNH). Presumed holotype examined. + + + +Material examined. +Holotype (presumed). ♀, AUSTRALIA:QLD: Mackay, Feb 1892 (BMNH). + + +Other material. +AUSTRALIA:NSW: Lansdowne, 1♀, 06.02.1981, G. & T. Williams (AMS); QLD: Capricorn Group, NW Islet, 2♀, Dec 25, A. Musgrave (AMS), 1♀, Nov-Dec 25, A. Musgrave (AMS); Clump Point, 1♀, 06.03.1964, I. F. B. Common & M. S. Upton (ANIC); Montville, 1♀, L. Smith (ANIC). +The collecting localities are shown in Fig. 24E. + + +Diagnosis. + +This species (of which only the female is known) is characterized by a black metasoma with a dark blue lustre, extensively yellow wings, and dark pubescence on scutum and propodeal enclosure. +Sphex resplendens +, which is otherwise similar, has uniformly dark wings. The pubescence on the propodeal enclosure of +Sphex modestus +is at least partially silvery or yellowish, and its hindwing membrane is missing the yellow tinge. +Sphex modestus +is also distinguished by the presence of tubercles on its metanotum, even though sometimes they are only faintly recognizable, while in +Sphex gilberti +the metanotum is plain. + + + +Description. + +Female: Body length 22.4-26.8 mm. Body black, legs brown. Wing membrane yellow, with slightly fuscous band at apex. Wing veins orange to light brown. Forebasitarsal rake with eigtht long spines. Free clypeal margin medially with two lobes which are separated only by a small notch. Appressed pubescence on clypeus and frons silvery, erect setae black. Clypeus with conspicuous indentation medioventrally and vertical glabrous stripe dorsoventrally. Distance between hind- ocelli approximately 0.6 +x +their shortest distances to compound eyes. Pubescence on collar silvery. Scutum with sparse, erect, black setae and denser, silvery-white setae laterally. Scutellum slightly convex, without impressions. Propodeal enclosure with sparse, erect black pubescence, sculpture completely visible. Length of petiole almost equal to flagellomere II. Tomentum moderately dense on metasomal tergum I, sparse on tergum II. + +Male: Unknown. + + +Figure 17. Habitus of +Sphex gilberti +, ♀. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1C/7C/371C7C145F9C300E3DCF0A2F2F4B69F6.xml b/data/37/1C/7C/371C7C145F9C300E3DCF0A2F2F4B69F6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e0bdf65de92 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1C/7C/371C7C145F9C300E3DCF0A2F2F4B69F6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Coracias +[ +gen. nov. +] + + + + +Rostrum +cultratum apice incurvato, basi pennis denudatum. + + +Lingua +cartilaginea, befida. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1D/20/371D202626CEE23F2D35D0D481B33FC1.xml b/data/37/1D/20/371D202626CEE23F2D35D0D481B33FC1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..325df01e66d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1D/20/371D202626CEE23F2D35D0D481B33FC1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,186 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Caryophyllaceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +632 +696 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Stellaria neglecta +Weihe + + + + + +Artbeschreibung: +Staengel +20-80 cm +. +Blaetter +am Grund gerundet bis +herzfoermig +, Stiel +/- kahl. + +Kronblaetter +etwa gleich lang bis 1,5mal +laenger +als die +Kelchblaetter + +, diese +5-7 mm +lang. + +Staubblaetter +meist 10 + +(5-11). Fruchtstiele 3-8mal so lang wie der Kelch. + +Samen +1,3-1,7 mm +lang + +, (reif) dunkelbraun, mit schmalen, spitzen +Hoeckern +. + + + + +Bluetezeit +: 4-7 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz: Feuchte +Waelder +/ kollin / CH zerstreut + + + + +Verbreitung global: +Suedeuropaeisch-westasiatisch + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F +feucht; Feuchtigkeit +maessig +wechselnd ( ++/- +1-2 Stufen) +Lichtzahl LhalbschattigSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rschwach sauer bis neutral (pH 4.5-7.5)Temperaturzahl T +sehr warm-kollin (nur an +waermsten +Stellen, Hauptverbreitung in +Suedeuropa +) +
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +naehrstoffreich + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subozeanisch (hohe Luftfeuchtigkeit, geringe Temperaturschwankungen, eher milde Winter)
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: + +Uebersehene +Vogelmiere + +Nom +francais +: + +Stellaire +negligee + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1D/29/371D296C8108501EB51F436CB3D87D41.xml b/data/37/1D/29/371D296C8108501EB51F436CB3D87D41.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..440210ce63c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1D/29/371D296C8108501EB51F436CB3D87D41.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Floristic inventory and distribution characteristics of algific talus slopes in a specific area of forest biodiversity in South Korea + + + +Author + +Lee, Jong-Won +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-8396 +Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Yun, Ho-Geun +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Hwang, Tae Young +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Kyungmin +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Jung, Se-Hoon +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +An, Jong Bin +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea +ajb8825@korea.kr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-12-18 + + +11 + + +113952 +113952 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 +1314-2828-11-e113952 +5B963235F71B550FA1E3BC1F0E590B10 + + + + +Euonymus alatus f. ciliato-dentatus (Franch. & Sav.) Hiyama, 1956 + + + +Distribution +South Siberia to Japan and China + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1E/1B/371E1BC6F4875B61AC3BAAE7FD621361.xml b/data/37/1E/1B/371E1BC6F4875B61AC3BAAE7FD621361.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..69ebc1d1296 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1E/1B/371E1BC6F4875B61AC3BAAE7FD621361.xml @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ + + + +Distribution patterns of Chinese Cixiidae (Hemiptera, Fulgoroidea), highlight their high endemic diversity + + + +Author + +Luo, Yang +Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management, Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China, Yangling, China + + + +Author + +Bourgoin, Thierry +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-2478 +Institut de Systematique, Evolution, Biodiversite, ISYEB-UMR 7205, MNHN-CNRS-Sorbonne Universite-EPHE-Univ. Antilles, Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, CP 50, 57 rue Cuvier, F- 75005, Paris, France +thierry.bourgoin@mnhn.fr + + + +Author + +Zhang, Jia-Lin +Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management, Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China, Yangling, China + + + +Author + +Feng, Ji-Nian +Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management, Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China, Yangling, China +jinianf@nwsuaf.edu.cn + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2022 + +2022-01-24 + + +10 + + +75303 +75303 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e75303 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e75303 +1314-2828-10-e75303 +07802C19F192544C9F561556F25CA5C4 + + + + +Betacixius brunneus Matsumura, 1914 + + + + +Betacixius brunneus +Matsumura, 1914: 417.| Hori, 1982: 181.| Tsaur et al., 1991b: 37.| Zhang & Chen, 2011b: 50.| Hayashi & Fujinuma, 2016: 323. + + + +Distribution + +China: Fujian, Zhejiang, Taiwan ( +Zhang and Chen 2011b +); Japan; Nansei-shoto: Ryukyu Islands ( +Hayashi and Fujinuma 2016 +). + + + +Notes +New record: China: Fujian (Taoyuan valley scenic spot of wuyi Mountain). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1E/8D/371E8D2D152594D7F9B288A0BC30429F.xml b/data/37/1E/8D/371E8D2D152594D7F9B288A0BC30429F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..621dc45d955 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1E/8D/371E8D2D152594D7F9B288A0BC30429F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,364 @@ + + + +Order Carnivora + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +532 +628 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Genetta maculata +Gray 1830 + + + + + + + +Genetta maculata +Gray 1830 + +, +Spicil. Zool., 2: 9 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +"in Africa Boreali". Subsequently redefined by + +Gaubert et al. (2003 +b +) + +as " +6 km +from Hirna (Harrar Road, + +2180m + +), +Ethiopia +", following designation of a +neotype + +. + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Rusty-spotted Genet +. + + + + +Synonyms: + +Genetta aequatorialis +Heuglin 1866 + +; + +Genetta albiventris +Roberts 1932 + +; + +Genetta deorum +Funaioli and Simonetta 1960 + +; + +Genetta erlangeri +Matschie 1902 + +; + +Genetta fieldiana +Du Chaillu 1860 + +; + +Genetta gleimi +Matschie 1902 + +; + +Genetta insularis +Cabrera 1921 + +; + +Genetta letabae +Thomas and Schwann 1906 + +; + +Genetta matschiei +Neumann 1902 + +; + +Genetta pumila +Hollister 1916 + +; + +Genetta schoutedeni +Crawford-Cabral 1970 + +; + +Genetta schraderi +Matschie 1902 + +; + +Genetta soror +Schwarz 1929 + +; + +Genetta stuhlmanni +Matschie 1902 + +; + +Genetta suahelica +Matschie 1902 + +; + +Genetta zambesiana +Matschie 1902 + +; + +Genetta zuluensis +Roberts 1924 + +. + + + + +Distribution: +Angola +, +Botswana +, +Cameroon +, +Central African Republic +, +Chad +, Dem. Rep. +Congo +, +Eritrea +, +Equatorial Guinea +(incl. Bioko), +Ethiopia +, +Gabon +, +Ghana +, +Kenya +, +Malawi +, +Mozambique +, +Namibia +, +Nigeria +, +Republic of Congo +, +Rwanda +, +Somalia +, +South Africa +, +Sudan +, +Tanzania +, +Togo +, +Uganda +, +Zambia +, +Zimbabwe +. + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +– Lower Risk (lc). + + + + +Discussion: +Traditionally recognized as + +G. rubiginosa +Pucheran, 1855 + +; this form is attributed to + +G. thierryi + +(see + +Schlawe, 1980 + +a +, 1981 + + +; +Crawford-Cabral and Pacheco, 1992 +). + +Gaubert et al. (2003 +a + +, +b +) proposed that + +rubiginosa +Pucheran, 1855 + +is a +nomen oblitum +. Synonyms allocated according to +Roberts (1951) +, +Crawford-Cabral and Pacheco (1992) +and + +Gaubert et al. (2003 +a + +, +b +). +Rosevear (1974) +believed that + +V. maculata +Gray (1830) + +was invalid, but see + +Schlawe (1980 + +a +, 1981 + + +) who defended its use. See + +Gaubert et al. (2003 +a + +, +b +) for usage of the name + +V. maculata +Gray, 1830 + +. + +Crawford-Cabral (1981 +a +) + +and +Ansell (1978) +placed genets west of the +Dahomey +Gap in + +pardina + +and southern and eastern populations in + +rubiginosa + +(= + +maculata + +) (except for the extreme southern + +tigrina + +), which is followed here. + +G. schoutedeni +Crawford-Cabral, 1970 + +and + +suahelica +Matschie, 1902 + +should probably best be considered +incertae sedis +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1E/D6/371ED6D3C1555A7AA060FF301AAC6250.xml b/data/37/1E/D6/371ED6D3C1555A7AA060FF301AAC6250.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eb5c86dc45c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1E/D6/371ED6D3C1555A7AA060FF301AAC6250.xml @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ + + + +A nomenclator of extant and fossil taxa of the Melanopsidae (Gastropoda, Cerithioidea) + + + +Author + +Neubauer, Thomas A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-9941 +Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria +thomas.neubauer@nhm-wien.ac.at + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +2016-07-05 + + +602 + + +1 +358 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 +1313-2970-602-1 +65EFA27673454AC69B78DBE7E98D6103 +FFA86D39FFE2FFF3FF8AFFEBC209FFDE +126863 + + + + + +Melanopsis +costata var. inflexa Pallary, 1939 + + + + +Original source. + +Pallary 1939 +: 90. + + + +Type locality. +Not explicitly stated but probably the same as for the species ("Disjr ech Chogour" [Jisr Ash-Shughur], Syria). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1E/E2/371EE2FDFC1324E2725EFDC5EC98491C.xml b/data/37/1E/E2/371EE2FDFC1324E2725EFDC5EC98491C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..89d552436ca --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1E/E2/371EE2FDFC1324E2725EFDC5EC98491C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,355 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Gelis rufogaster Thunberg, 1827 + + + + +aemulus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +alienus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +anceps +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +astutus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +bicinctus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +carnifex +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +consobrinus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +currens +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +debilis +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +detritus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +emarcidus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +flavipes +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +gracilis +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +helvolus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +immaturus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +insectator +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +juvenilis +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +languidus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +lividus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +lugubris +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +lutescens +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +puberulus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +puerilis +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +pulcher +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +pulex +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +rufulus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +scitulus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +squalidus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +unicolor +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +venustus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +annulicornis +(Bridgman, 1883, +Hemimachus +) + + +areneicola +(Rudow, 1914, +Pezomachus +) + + +aphidum +(Rudow, 1917, +Pezomachus +) + + +areneicolus +(Rudow, 1917, +Pezomachus +) preocc. + + +balteatus +(Rudow, 1917, +Pezomachus +) preocc. + + +isabellinus +(Rudow, 1917, +Pezomachus +) + + +pemphigicola +(Rudow, 1917, +Pezomachus +) + + +pieridis +(Rudow, 1917, +Pezomachus +) + + +ulmicola +(Rudow, 1917, +Pezomachus +) + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland + + +Notes + +Pezomachus annulicornis +synonymised with rufulus ( +Foerster +), now a synonym of rufogaster, listed as a separate species in +Yu and Horstmann (1997) +but synonymy confirmed by +Schwarz and Shaw (1999) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1E/E4/371EE4A000D808AFAEFDDA2E770E2937.xml b/data/37/1E/E4/371EE4A000D808AFAEFDDA2E770E2937.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0629c6faad8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1E/E4/371EE4A000D808AFAEFDDA2E770E2937.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Polychaetes of Greece: an updated and annotated checklist + + + +Author + +Faulwetter, Sarah + + + +Author + +Simboura, Nomiki + + + +Author + +Katsiaras, Nikolaos + + + +Author + +Chatzigeorgiou, Giorgos + + + +Author + +Arvanitidis, Christos + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2017 + +5 + + +20997 +20997 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 +1314-2828--20997 + + + + +Prionospio ehlersi Fauvel, 1928 + + + + +Prionospio (Prionospio) ehlersi +Fauvel, 1928 | +Prionospio ehlersi +Fauvel, 1928 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1F/A5/371FA5FD8BB82E7ECA1CD8C9FAFE57A1.xml b/data/37/1F/A5/371FA5FD8BB82E7ECA1CD8C9FAFE57A1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f880e6e476b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1F/A5/371FA5FD8BB82E7ECA1CD8C9FAFE57A1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +bousquety1@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-11-28 + + +245 + + +1 +1722 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 +1313-2970-245-1 +FFFF52503A0AFF882450FFB66D45FF8E +578462 + + + + +Bembidion morulum LeConte, 1863 + + + + +Bembidium morulum +LeConte, 1863c: 19. Type locality: +"Hudson's +Bay Territory" (original citation), restricted to "Churchill, Manit[oba]" by Lindroth (1963b: 389). Two syntypes in CMNH (collection Ulke). + + +Bembidion browni +Lindroth, 1955a: 73. Type locality: "Churchill, Manitoba" (original citation). Holotype (♂) in CNC [# 6572]. Synonymy established by Lindroth (1963b: 389). Note. Lindroth (1954b: 158) proposed the name earlier but he did not meet the requirements of availability (ICZN, Article 13.1) at the time. + + + +Distribution. +This species is known from Newfoundland to central Alaska, south to northeastern British Columbia and southern Alberta in the Rocky Mountains (Lindroth 1963b: 389). Fossil remnants of this species, dated between about 10,400 and 28,000 years B.P., have been unearthed in eastern Minnesota, northeastern Wisconsin, Illinois (Schwert 1992: 77), Iowa (Baker et al. 1986: 96; Schwert 1992: 77), central North Dakota (Ashworth and Schwert 1992: 260), and Cape Breton Island in Nova Scotia (Miller 1997: 250). + + +Records. + +CAN +: AB, BC, MB, NF, NT, ON, SK, YT +USA +: AK + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/1F/E8/371FE8738B001B92ED75F1A9F5E092C4.xml b/data/37/1F/E8/371FE8738B001B92ED75F1A9F5E092C4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0721adc185a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/1F/E8/371FE8738B001B92ED75F1A9F5E092C4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ + + + +A key to Camponotus Mayr of Australia. + + + +Author + +McArthur, A. J. + +text + + +Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute + + + +Editor + +Snelling, R. R. + + + +Editor + +Fisher, B. L. + + + +Editor + +Ward, P. S. + + +2007 + +Advances in ant systematics (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Homage to E. O. Wilson - 50 years of contributions. + + +80 + + +290 +351 + + + + +http://hdl.handle.net/10199/15375 + +journal article +21285 + + + + +Camponotus mackayensis Forel + + + +Worker. HW 1.00 - 1.15; HL 1.00 - 1.70; PW 0.80 - 1.05. Redbrown, pronotum lighter than mesonotum; propodeal dorsum a shallow concavity; long erect setae on most surfaces including scape. Major worker. Head sides straight; vertex straight, anterior half coarsely punctate, clypeus oval, widest at truncation, anterior margin narrow; node summit blunt; metanotum a wide shallow groove. Minor worker. Head sides anterior half tapering forward; vertex slightly convex between widely rounded corners; anterior clypeal margin projecting, convex; propodeal dorsum straight, angle well rounded nearly 150°; metanotum a distinct vee; propodeal dorsum anterior inclined upward to a ridge then shallowly concave, then a wide angle; node summit rounded. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/20/87/372087BCFFF29121FCEB3DE914557E44.xml b/data/37/20/87/372087BCFFF29121FCEB3DE914557E44.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1c138fe71bb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/20/87/372087BCFFF29121FCEB3DE914557E44.xml @@ -0,0 +1,345 @@ + + + +Complete mitochondrial genomes from museum specimens clarify millipede evolution in the Eastern Arc Mountains + + + +Author + +Nielsen, Martin + + + +Author + +Margaryan, Ashot + + + +Author + +Nielsen, Tejs Lind + + + +Author + +Enghoff, Henrik + + + +Author + +Allentoft, Morten E. + +text + + +Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society + + +2022 + +2022-10-01 + + +196 + + +2 + + +924 +939 + + + + +https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/196/2/924/6697062 + +journal article +164204 +10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac058 +caf1f98b-3740-405f-bec6-9e7947a7c566 +0024-4082 +7184588 + + + + + + +TROPOSTREPTUS + +PHYLOGENY AND EVOLUTION + + + + + +Twenty-one of our included mitochondrial genomes belong to + +Tropostreptus + +, allowing for a thorough investigation of the evolution of this genus in the Eastern Arc. We observe a clear genetic structure in + +Tropostreptus + +, with distinct lineages (both inter- and intraspecific) being defined by the mountain blocks ( +Fig. 4 +). This is consistent with previous genetic results of Eastern Arc gene pools (e.g. cat snakes: +Gravlund, 2002 +; chameleons: + +Tolley +et al. +, 2011 + +; African violets: + +Dimitrov +et al. +, 2012 + +), where forestadapted species inhabit the montane forests and are absent from the adjacent savannah lowlands. Today, the mountains capture the oceanic winds from the Indian Ocean, which maintains sufficient humidity for dense rain forest to grow, resulting in the forest ‘sky islands’ ( +Lovett, 1993a +, b; + +Burgess +et al. +, 2007 + +). Until 30 Mya, the Eastern Arc region is thought to have been covered by rain forest ( +Rodgers, 1998 +; + +Couvreur +et al. +, 2008 + +), and an uplifting of the Eastern Arc Mountains is believed to have occurred within the last 7 Myr (although this is debated), changing the whole topography of East Africa ( +Griffiths, 1993 +; +Ring, 2014 +; +Macgregor, 2015 +). Climatic and geological fluctuations through time have thus repeatedly affected the forest cover and, presumably, resulted in a multitude of vicariance events when species were isolated in patchy forest remnants ( +Lovett, 1993a +; + +Sepulchre +et al. +, 2006 + +; + +Couvreur +et al. +, 2008 + +). For these reasons, the splitting order we observe in the + +Tropostreptus + +phylogeny might well reflect forest fragmentation in ancient times. + + +We observe a general trend, whereby northern lineages appear to split off first. The earliest split in + +Tropostreptus + +separates the + +Tropostreptus austerus + ++ + +Tropostreptus severus + +lineage from the rest, and the second split separates these two species, today occupying Nguru and Usambara Mountains in the north. A similar intraspecific pattern is evident in more recent splits in + +Tropostreptus hamatus + +and + +Tropostreptus sigmatospinus + +( +Fig. 4 +), suggesting a repeated pattern of vicariance events occurring first in the north. A separation of species between northern and southern mountains has also been observed in several other Eastern Arc taxa, including amphibians ( +Blackburn & Measey, 2009 +), gastropods ( + +Tattersfield +et al. +, 1998 + +) and reptiles ( +Gravlund, 2002 +; + +Tolley +et al. +, 2011 + +), but also in well-dispersing taxa, such as birds ( +Fjeldså & Bowie, 2008 +). + + +This indicates a forest retraction southwards during dry periods, resulting in vicariance events, followed by forest expansion and thus northward recolonization of species during periods with higher humidity. Northward migration is also observed in other Eastern Arc species, such as chameleons ( + +Tolley +et al. +, 2011 + +; + +Ceccarelli +et al. +, 2014 + +). A recent cycle of forest expansion/retraction can explain why + +Tropostreptus hamatus + +and + +Tropostreptus sigmatospinus + +exist across several of the mountains without having evolved into distinct species yet. Other events have isolated + +Tropostreptus kipunji + +in the forest on Mount Rungwe, the most south-westerly occurring species in the Eastern Arc region, in addition to + +Tropostreptus sigmatospinus + +in +Zanzibar +and, potentially, also the Rondo Plateau, from where + +Tropostreptus + +has been observed but for which molecular data are still lacking ( +Enghoff, 2017 +). + + +Regarding the timing of the species splits ( +Fig. 5 +), several major events might have played a role. Around 30 Mya the Antarctic ice sheet started to form ( + +Couvreur +et al. +, 2008 + +), along with rifting that started to occur in northern East Africa ( +Ring, 2014 +), possibly initiating the fragmentation of the pan-African forest. Through millions of years, the rifting would continue southwards ( +Ring, 2014 +), affecting the topology and possibly related to the forest fragmentation responsible for the divergence of + +Tropostreptus austerus + +and + +Tropostreptus severus + +observed ~22 Mya. The observed divergence of + +Tropostreptus hamatus + +and the split between + +Tropostreptus austerus + +and + +Tropostreptus severus + +correspond well to the closing of the Tethys Sea (17 Mya), which would have altered ocean currents and, probably, the climate of the area ( + +Couvreur +et al. +, 2008 + +). Likewise, the isolation of the + +Tropostreptus kipunji + +lineage corresponds with the uplifting of Mount Rungwe from ~8 Mya ( +Ring, 2014 +). Finally, between 5 Mya and today, we observe a radiation in + +Tropostreptus hamatus + +and + +Tropostreptus sigmatospinus + +( +Fig. 5 +). A reasonable explanation for this is the uplift of the Eastern Arc Mountains, shifting the precipitation from the lowlands to the mountains ( +Lovett, 1993a +, b), in combination with the Antarctic ice sheet forming, thus decreasing global humidity ( + +Polyak +et al. +, 2010 + +). This would lead to the emergence of savannah in the lowlands between the mountains ( + +Sepulchre +et al. +, 2006 + +; + +Ségalen +et al. +, 2007 + +; + +Couvreur +et al. +, 2008 + +), isolating the montane forest and limiting migration between populations of forest-restricted species. + + +We emphasize that we have neither good fossil records nor mtDNA mutation rates estimated specifically for millipedes, which is why the split times of our millipede phylogenetic tree should be interpreted with caution. Moreover, comparable studies with dated phylogenies of Eastern Arc species are sparse, hence it is difficult to compare the split times we have estimated with those of other species in the region. Examining two separate studies of chameleons ( + +Kinyongia +Tilbury, Tolley & Branch, 2006 + +and + +Trioceros +Swainson, 1839 + +) with dated phylogenies based on both mitochondrial and nuclear markers did show some correspondence with our dated splits ( + +Tolley +et al. +, 2011 + +; + +Ceccarelli +et al. +, 2014 + +). + +Tolley +et al. +(2011) + +dated the earliest split between the northern and southern Eastern Arc species to ~28 Mya, and both studies show several radiation events between 5 and 20 Mya, corresponding to the same overall time frame that we are discussing for the millipedes. In contrast, the chameleons display fewer speciation events during the last 5 Myr than the millipedes, perhaps suggesting that the latter have been more susceptible to vicariance during more recent climatic events. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFD17511FF8BF9A9FA26E706.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFD17511FF8BF9A9FA26E706.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..94d21e02479 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFD17511FF8BF9A9FA26E706.xml @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + + +85. + + +Verbena stricta +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 53. 1801. + + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +UNITED STATES +. +Illinois +: + +Michaux s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341491 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +G +[ +G00341489 +]!, +P +[ +P00307087 +, +P00650837 +]!, +P-MICH +[ +P00307085 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. – +The name + +Verbena stricta + +has been validated on the basis of a Michaux collection from +Illinois +cultivated in Cels’s garden. Material collected by Michaux exists in Ventenat’s herbarium and cultivated material from the garden of Cels is extant in G-DC [G00657716]. We designate here the Michaux collection at G as the +lectotype +as it is in a better state of conservation and represented by two duplicates in P and one in P-MICH respectively. The latter specimen is also the +holotype +of the illeg. name + +Verbena rigens +Michx. +O’Leary et al. (2010) + +give as type for + +V. rigens + +a specimen +sine coll. +in P that they have not seen; their typification cannot be accepted. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFD17511FF8BFBA2FE44E35C.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFD17511FF8BFBA2FE44E35C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6e101ca9a88 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFD17511FF8BFBA2FE44E35C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +84. + + + +Turpinia paniculata +Vent. + +in Mém. Cl. + +Sci. Math. Inst. Natl. +France +8: 6. 1807 + + +[ +cited in Choix Pl.: tab. 31. 1807]. + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +DOMINICAN REPUBLIC +/ +HAITI +: + +“St. Domingo”, + +Poiteau +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341609 +]!; isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341668 +, +G00341670 +, +G00341678 +]!, G-DC [ +G00458760 +]!, P-JU n° 16024 [ +P00678736 +]!). + + + + += + +Turpinia occidentalis +(Sw.) G. Don + + + + + +Notes +. – Several specimens of a single gathering have been located. A fragment of the +Poiteau s.n. +collection is in G-DC with the mention “M. B. Delessert 1816” and is here considered to have been previously part of Ventenat’s herbarium (see introduction). The single collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFD17511FF8BFE00FD80E159.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFD17511FF8BFE00FD80E159.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b552a2d64b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFD17511FF8BFE00FD80E159.xml @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +83. + + +Tradescantia rosea +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 24. 1801. + + + + + +Ξ + +Callisia rosea +(Vent.) D.R. Hunt + + + + + + + +Typus: +UNITED + +STATES +: +“Caroline et Floride” +, +Michaux s.n. +( +holo- +: +G +[ +G00341445 +]!; + + +iso- +: +P +[ +P02173797 +]!, +P-MICH +[ +P00667162 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. – +A single collection has been located in Ventenat’s herbarium. This collection is wrongly labelled “Beauvois” standing for Ambroise Marie François Joseph Palisot de Beauvois (1752-1820). However, Ventenat in +Descriptions +(1801: tab. 24) referred to material collected by Michaux “dans la Basse-Caroline et dans la +Géorgie +” that was cultivated in Cels’s garden. Two duplicates of the specimen collected in the wild have been found in Paris in P and in P-MICH respectively. Cultivated material kept in MPU (Herb. Thibaud) and P (Herb. Bonpland) labelled as “Hort. Cels” and “Hort. Malmaison” respectively have probably been collected after the validation of the name + +T. rosea + +in 1801 and should therefore not be considered as original material. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FCDBFD27FA20E064.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FCDBFD27FA20E064.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4c9015e9837 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FCDBFD27FA20E064.xml @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +28. + + +Heracleum absinthifolium +Vent., Choix Pl. + +: tab. 7. 1803. + + + + + +Ξ + +Zosima absinthifolia +(Vent.) Link + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +TURKEY +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341310 +]!) ( +Fig. 5 +). + + + + + +Notes +. – When validating the name + +Heracleum absinthifolium +, Ventenat + +referred to “Sphondylium orientale humulius, foliis absinthii”, a pre-linnean name coined by Joseph Pitton de Tournefort (1656-1708) in the herbaria of Vaillant and Jussieu. A specimen has been located in Herb. Vaillant and is here considered as original material [P00662760]. Further collections of Bruguière and Olivier from +Turkey +have been located in G-DC [G00477269]. The only collection f rom Cels’s garden in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. Recent revisions of the genus + +Zosima +Hoffm. + +( +Alava, 1987 +; Menemen & +Jury, 2001 +) cited as type material a collection at G with the locality information taken from Ventenat; however no collection exists with this locality. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FCDBFECDFC47E7DC.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FCDBFECDFC47E7DC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4bb7c011239 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FCDBFECDFC47E7DC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +27. + + +Eupatorium ayapana +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 3. 1803. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +BRAZIL +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341565 +right hand specimen]!; + + +probable isolecto-: G-DC [ +G00495105 +]!). + + + + + += + +Ayapana triplinervis +(Vahl) R.M. King & H. Rob. + + + + + +Notes +. – +The +only sheet in the +Ventenat +herbarium consists of two gatherings. +The +plant cultivated at +Malmaison +and a +Michaux +collection from +Mauritius +[ +G00341565 +left hand specimen] where the plant had for long been cultivated. +We +designate here as the +lectotype +the specimen from Malmaison as it is the most complete material. A probable isolectotype exists in G-DC. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FF8BFA53FDB8E22F.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FF8BFA53FDB8E22F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f563158733e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FF8BFA53FDB8E22F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +26. + + +Epilobium tomentosum +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 90. 1802. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +IRAN +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00406205 +]!; + + +probable isolecto-: +G-DC +[ +G00654566 +]!). + + + + + += + +Epilobium hirsutum +L. + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located in Ventenat’s herbarium at G. It represents the plant cultivated in Cels’s garden. A collection in G-DC with the mention “h. Cels” may represents original material. We therefore prefer to designate here the +lectotype +on the unique collection extant in Ventenat’s herbarium. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FF8BFBCBFF52E076.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FF8BFBCBFF52E076.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eb7054b315c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FF8BFBCBFF52E076.xml @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +25. + + +Echium thyrsoideum +Juss. ex Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: sub tab. 97. 1805. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +EUROPE +: + +Anon. s.n. +( +P-JU +n° 6609 [ +P00667187 +]!). + + + + + += + +Echium maculatum +L. + + + + + +Notes +. – Ventenat clearly referred to a plant that was communicated to him by Jussieu. No material was found at G and the collection in the P-JU herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FF8BFE02FF58E6FF.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FF8BFE02FF58E6FF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b738e52b13f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17521FF8BFE02FF58E6FF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +24. + + +Diosma cerefolia +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: tab. 83. 1805. + + + + + +Ξ + +Agathosma cerefolia +(Vent.) Bartl. & H.L.Wendl. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +SOUTH AFRICA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00006331 +]!; + + +isolecto-: G-DC [ +G00219310 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located: one in Ventenat’s herbarium at G and a fragment in G-DC with the mention “M. B. Delessert 1816”. The later was therefore part of Ventenat’s herbarium before Delessert gave this fragment to Candolle (see introduction). The collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + +Another collection in G-DC [G00219309] originating from Malmaison has been collected after the validation of the name + +Diosma cerefolia + +and cannot be considered as original material. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17522FCDBFA41FEF6E0A7.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17522FCDBFA41FEF6E0A7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..54d97c8ca2a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE17522FCDBFA41FEF6E0A7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +29. + + +Hypericum dolabriforme +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 45. 1801. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated by +Robson, 1996: 123 +): + +U NITED STATES + +. +Kentucky +: + +Michaux +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341526 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +P +[ +P01901389 +, +P02442087 +, +P02442088 +, +P02442089 +, +P02442090 +]!, +P-JU +n° 11841 [ +P00667214 +]!, +P-MICH +[ +P00667207 +, +P00667217 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – + +Hypericum dolabriforme + +is endemic to the southeastern regions of the +United States +(from southern +Indiana +to northwestern +Georgia +) ( +Robson, 1996 +). Only a single specimen exists in Ventenat’s herbarium, i.e. the Michaux collection from +Kentucky +. +Michaux (1803: 81) +validated the name + +H. procumbens +Michx. + +[nom. illeg.] [non Desf. ex Willd.] based on the same material. +Robson (1996: 123) +implicitly lectotypied Ventenat’s name by referring to the unique specimen at G. A collection of this species given by Ventenat to Jussieu from Cels’s garden in 1803 is here considered as original material (P-JU n° 11832 [P00667211]). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE27522FCC2FA1AFA09E2B2.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE27522FCC2FA1AFA09E2B2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f1656f8f8f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE27522FCC2FA1AFA09E2B2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +31. + + + +Inga filipes +Vent. + +in Mém. Cl. + +Sci. Math. Inst. Natl. +France +8: 6. 1807 + + +[also in +Choix. Pl.: tab. 38. 1807 +]. + + + + + +Ξ + +Cojoba filipes +(Vent.) Barneby & J.W. Grimes + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +D OMINICAN REPUBLIC / HAITI +: + +“ +St. Domingo +”, + +Poiteau +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341450 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341677 +]!, G-DC [ +G00652190 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located: one in Ventenat’s herbarium at G and a fragment in G-DC with the mention “M. B. Delessert 1816”. The later was therefore part of Ventenat’s herbarium before Delessert gave this fragment to Candolle (see introduction). The collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. A Poiteau duplicate is also present in G [ +G00341677 +]. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE27522FF72FA00FB0CE082.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE27522FF72FA00FB0CE082.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3a15df86e52 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE27522FF72FA00FB0CE082.xml @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +30. + + + +Illicium parviflorum +Michx. ex Vent., Tabl. Règn. Vég. + +3: 71. 1799 + +[cited in +Descr. Pl. Nouv.: tab. 22. 1801 +]. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +UNITED STATES +. +Florida +: + +Lake George +, + +Michaux +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341506 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +P +[ +P01656597 +upper specimen]!, +P-MICH +[ +P00667213 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. – + +Lin +(2000: 177) + +in his revision of the genus cited the type of the name of this species as: “ +U.S. +Lake George, details unkown”. +This +cannot be accepted as an implicit lectotypification. +Two +specimens exist at G: the cultivated specimen from +Cels’s +garden [ +G00341505 +] and the collection from Michaux. The latter is designated as the +lectotype +as it is more complete and two isolectotypes have been located in the P and in P-MICH herbaria respectively. + + +A specimen annotated in Ventenat’s hand “ +Illicium parviflorum H. Cels +t. 22” and in D. F. K. v. Schlechtendal’s hand “Ventenat. W [illdenow]” [B-W 10382-01 0] is also available for interpretation of this name. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FCDBFB49FA0CE3FD.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FCDBFB49FA0CE3FD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bad5962635a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FCDBFB49FA0CE3FD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +36. + + +Jatropha hernandiifolia +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: sub tab. 52. 1804. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +U NITED +STATES + + +. +Puerto Rico +: + +sine loc. +, +Riedlé s.n. +( +P +[ +P04829499 +]!; + + +isolecto-: P-JU n° 16506 [ +P00678913 +]!) + +. + + + + +Notes +. – +Dehgan (2012: 145) +cited a +Poiteau s.n. +collection as +type +collected in Santo Domingo [ +P04829428 +]. + +Ventenat in +Jardin de Malmaison + +(1804: sub tab. 52) clearly stated that he has obtained this taxon from +Riedlé +in +Puerto Rico +while travelling on the + +Belle-Angélique + +to the +West Indies +and Porto Rico with his friend +Baudin +(see introduction). + + +No collection of + +Jatropha hernandiifolia + +exists at G but two collections have been found in P. On the collection +Riedlé s.n. +[P04829499] “graines n° 131” has been written and this collection does represent the collection +form which Ventenat +obtained seeds. It is here designated as the +lectotype +. A Herb. Baudin collection in P-JU is considered as isolectotype because it also represents material gathered by Riedlé (see above). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FCDBFD65FC33E17C.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FCDBFD65FC33E17C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9e159f7ba13 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FCDBFD65FC33E17C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +35. + + +Ionidium strictum +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: sub tab. 27. 1803. + + + + + +Ξ + +Viola stricta +(Vent.) Poir. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +D OMINICAN REPUBLIC / HAITI +: + +“ +St. Domingo +”, + +Poiteau +s.n. + +( +P-JU +n° 12799 [ +P00672092 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +G-DC +[ +G00209948 +]!, +P-JU +n° 12799 [ +P00672093 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – No collection has been located at G. Two collections have been located at P-JU and one at G-DC. The more complete collection at P-JU is designated here as the +lectotype +and the remaining collections are considered as isolectotypes. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FF88FECDFD9BE15F.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FF88FECDFD9BE15F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..68b9d376e2e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FF88FECDFD9BE15F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +32. + + +Inula gnaphalodes +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 75. 1802. + + + + + +Ξ + +Pulicaria gnaphalodes +(Vent.) Boiss. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +IRAN +]: + +Anon. s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341476 +right-hand specimen]!). + + + + + +Notes. – +This +species was described on the basis of material brought back by +Bruguière +and +Olivier +from +Iran +. +Several +collections have been located of this material at G-DC and P. A single collection exists in +Ventenat’s +herbarium but with two gatherings. +The +left part represents the cultivated collection from +Cels’s +garden and the right part a collection with, possibly, +Desfointaines’s +handwriting. +We +have not been able to trace this collection in the historical nor general collections at P. + +Lack +(1980: 116) + +designated tab. + +75 in +Descriptions + +as the +lectotype +. +The +finding of original material supersedes this explicit lectotypification. +We +prefer to designate here the collection +Anon. s.n. +as the +lectotype +despite the fact that we neither know the collector nor the origin. This collection is a flowering specimen and possibly used for the preparation of the drawing. The cultivated collection from Cels’s garden is sterile and is here considered as original material G [ +G00341476 +left-hand specimen]. +Other +original material collected by +Bruguière +and +Olivier +documents the morphology of this plant in the wild (G-DC [ +G00468136 +], P [ +P02812002 +, +P02812003 +, +P02812004 +, +P03295331 +]). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FF8BF911FC77E780.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FF8BF911FC77E780.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5fa1daef229 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FF8BF911FC77E780.xml @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +34. + + +Ionidium heterophyllum +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: sub tab. 27. 1803. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +C HINA +: + +sine loc., d’Incarville 109 +( +P-JU +n° 12788 [ +P00667186 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341597 +]!). + + + + + += + +Afrohybanthus enneaspermus +(L.) Flicker + + + + + +Notes +. – +Flicker & Ballard (2015: 48) +cited the collection at P-JU as the +holotype +. Ventenat in +Jardin de Malmaison +(1803: sub tab. 27) clearly mentioned “ex Herb Juss” and the collection deposited in his herbarium at P-JU should be considered as the +holotype +. Nevertheless, as above under + +Ionidium buxifolium + +, the G collection is a very fragmented clastotype and the collection deposited at P-JU is a much better preserved collection and was used by Ventenat for the description of + +Ionidium heterophyllum + +. The P-JU collection is therefore designated as the +lectotype +but cannot be considered as the +holotype +as given by +Flicker & Ballard (2015) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FF8BFBA8FE10E3B4.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FF8BFBA8FE10E3B4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5c5ad2d3c97 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37523FF8BFBA8FE10E3B4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +33. + + +Ionidium buxifolium +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: sub tab. 27. 1803. + + + + + +Ξ + +Afrohybanthus buxifolius +(Vent.) Flicker + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +M +ADAGASCAR + +: +sine loc., Commerson s.n. +( +P-JU +n° 12784 [ +P00667193 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341436 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – +Flicker & Ballard (2015: 44) +transferred + +Ionidium buxifolium + +to their new genus + +Afrohybanthus +Flicker +(Violaceae) + +. +The authors cited the collection at P-JU as the +holotype +. Ventenat in +Jardin de Malmaison +(1803: sub tab. 27) explicitly mentioned “ex Herb Juss”. However, at G a very fragmented clastotype exists. We therefore considered that the collection in P-JU should be designated as the +lectotype +since it is a much better preserved collection and the specimen was used by Ventenat for the validation of the name + +Ionidium buxifolium + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37524FCDBF8CFFE91E779.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37524FCDBF8CFFE91E779.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..626e3c7b268 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE37524FCDBF8CFFE91E779.xml @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + + +37. + + +Lantana nivea +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 8. 1803. + + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +BRAZIL +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341488 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341487 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – +Ventenat +stated that he had received material of this plant from gardens in the +East Indies +but it seems clear that the plant originated in southern +Brazil +( +Sanders, 2006 +). +The +latter author did not locate the +holotype +and designated the colour copper engraving in + +Ventenat’s +Jardin de Malmaison + +(1803: tab. 8) as the +lectotype +and also designated as the epitype a plant cultivated in +Paris +held at C +(Siebke s.n.). +The +finding of the type material in +Ventenat’s +herbarium supersedes this lectotypification. +Two +collections exists in +Ventenat’s +herbarium. +The +better preserved sheet is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47524FCC2FC56FBD6E36F.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47524FCC2FC56FBD6E36F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..005b4fbf0f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47524FCC2FC56FBD6E36F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,209 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +41. + + +Lunaria suffruticosa +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 19. 1800. + + + + + +Ξ + +Fibigia suffruticosa +(Vent.) Sweet + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +IRAN +: + +sine loc., +[ + +Bruguière +& + +] + +Olivier +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341542 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +G-DC +[ +G00204574 +, +G00204706 +]!, +P +[ +P00747689 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – +The +plant cultivated in +Cels’s +garden originated from a +Michaux +collection from +Persia +. + +Ventenat in +Descriptions + +(1800: tab. 19) nevertheless wrote that he had obtained the fruits from +Olivier +from the same locality where +Michaux +had collected. +In Ventenat’s +herbarium, no cultivated plant exists. A single collection carries the label: “ +Lunaria +sp. n. +e persia Ded. Olivier”. +This +collection is here designated as the +lectotype +with duplicates in G-DC and P. +The Michaux +collections originating from Persia are here considered as probable elements of original material (G-DC [ +G00204704 +], P [ +P00747690 +]). + +Cullen +(1965: 356) + +in his treatment of the genus + +Fibigia +Medik. + +for + +Flora +of +Turkey + +regarded both +Michaux +and +Olivier +collections as +syntypes +. + + +A specimen annotated in Ventenat’s hand “ +Lunaria suffruticosa H. Cels +pl. 19.” and in D. F. K. v. Schlechtendal’s hand “Ventenat. W[illdenow]” (B-W n° 11945) is also avalaible for interpretation of this name. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47524FCC2FECDFC36E672.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47524FCC2FECDFC36E672.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0c011fe68c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47524FCC2FECDFC36E672.xml @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +40. + + +Lithospermum decumbens +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 37. 1801. + + + + + +Ξ + +Arnebia decumbens +(Vent.) Coss. & Kralik + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +IRAQ +: + +de Bagdad à Mossoul +, + +Bruguière +& +Olivier +s.n. + +( +P +[ +P03877945 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +G-DC +[ +G00149288 +]!; + + +probable isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341671 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – A single specimen has been found in +Ventenat’s +herbarium. +The +collection probably lost its original label and only the locality “Barbarie” is noted though not in +Ventenat’s +handwriting. +Two Bruguière +and +Olivier +collections with a clear reference to the type locality ( +Baghdad +and +Mosul +in +Iraq +) have been located. +We +designate the sheet at P [ +P03877945 +] as the +lectotype +because it is more complete than the more fragmented collection in G-DC. +We +consider the collection in +Ventenat’s +herbarium at G as a probable isolectotype. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47524FF72FAB8FEDAE239.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47524FF72FAB8FEDAE239.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..be667ad3047 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47524FF72FAB8FEDAE239.xml @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +39. + + +Leptospermum triloculare +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: tab. 88. 1805. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +AUSTRALIA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341502 +upper specimen]!). + + + + + += + +Leptospermum arachnoides +Gaertn. + + + + + +Notes +. – A single herbarium sheet was found in Ventenat’s herbarium, on which two gatherings are mounted, one from Cels’s garden [ +G00341502 +lower specimen] and the other from Malmaison. The Malmaison collection is here designated as the +lectotype +because the plant has been published in + +Jardin de Malmaison +. No + +type was designated in +Thomson +(1999)’s revision of the genus + +Leptospermum +J.R. Forst. & G. Forst. + +in +Australia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47524FF72FD4DFEEDE02C.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47524FF72FD4DFEEDE02C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1b0fb648bdf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47524FF72FD4DFEEDE02C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +38. + + +Laserpitium triquetrum +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 97. 1803. + + + + + +Ξ + +Heptaptera triquetra +(Vent.) Tutin + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +TURKEY +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341535 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – The plant cultivated by Cels originated from a Bruguière and Olivier collection from +Turkey +. The cultivated specimen from +Cels in Ventenat’s +herbarium is designated as the +lectotype +as it represents the original material. Collections in G-BOIS [ +G00330753 +, +G00330754 +] and P [ +P04274054 +] are considered here as original material. + +Herrnstadt +& +Heyn +(1971: 106) + +designated a type at G and copied the locality given by + +Ventenat in +Descriptions + +(1803: tab. 8): “Constantinople sur les bords du Canal”. +No Bruguière +and +Olivier +collection exists with this locality (see +Material +and +Methods +chapter) and their potential implicit lectotypification is not accepted here. +The +G-BOIS collections have “voyage de Bruguière & Olivier en Orient” even if +Boissier +(1872: 944) gave “Hab. in collibus ad Bosphorum proper Byzantium (Oliv.!)”. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47525FCC2F978FE44E4F9.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47525FCC2F978FE44E4F9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7cd446cd14a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE47525FCC2F978FE44E4F9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +42. + + +Melaleuca gnidiifolia +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 4. 1803. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +AUSTRALIA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341462 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +G-DC +[ +G00659775 +]!). + + + + + += + +Melaleuca thymifolia +Sm. + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located: one in Ventenat’s herbarium at G and a fragment in G-DC with the mention “M. B. Delessert 1816”. The later was therefore part of Ventenat’s herbarium before Delessert gave this fragment Candolle (see introduction). The collection from Empress Joséphine’s garden in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FCDBFA58FC24E239.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FCDBFA58FC24E239.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..11a6fb5ff23 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FCDBFA58FC24E239.xml @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + + +49. + + +Nemesia foetens +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 41. 1804. + + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +SOUTH AFRICA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341534 +]!; + + +isolecto-: G-DC [ +G00654953 +]!). + + + + + += + +Nemesia fruticans +(Thunb.) Benth. + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located: one in Ventenat’s herbarium at G and a fragment in G-DC with the mention “h. Ventenat. B. Delessert 1810 [sic]”. The later was therefore part of Ventenat’s herbarium before Delessert gave this fragment to Candolle (see introduction). The collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FCDBFC16FA12E04C.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FCDBFC16FA12E04C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a049d27cd82 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FCDBFC16FA12E04C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +48. + + +Myrtus horizontalis +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 60. 1804 + +. + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +WEST +INDIES]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341464 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G-DC +[ +G00658454 +]!). + + + + + += + +Eugenia disticha +(Sw.) DC. + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located: one in Ventenat’s herbarium at G and a fragment in G-DC with the mention “M. B. Delessert 1816”. The later was therefore part of Ventenat’s herbarium before Delessert gave this fragment to Candolle (see introduction). The collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FCDBFDEDFAD3E6B2.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FCDBFDEDFAD3E6B2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..66e941026e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FCDBFDEDFAD3E6B2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +47. + + +Mimosa juniperina +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: tab. 64. 1804. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +AUSTRALIA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341521 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341519 +]!). + + + + + += + +Acacia ulicifolia +(Salisb.) Court + + + + + +Notes +. – +Two +gatherings have been found in +Ventenat’s +herbarium at G. +The +collection from +Port Jackson +in +Australia +[ +G00341520 +] where the plant has been discovered and the plant cultivated in Malmaison. We designate the cultivated collection as the +lectotype +as it is more complete and includes both flowers and fruits. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FF8BF91BFB01E719.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FF8BF91BFB01E719.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7f3bb5a4fb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FF8BF91BFB01E719.xml @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +46. + + +Mimosa floribunda +Vent., Choix Pl. + +: tab. 13. 1803. + + + + + +Ξ + +Acacia floribunda +(Vent.) Willd. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +AUSTRALIA +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341448 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +G +[ +G00341446 +]!, +G-DC +[ +G00652311 +]!, probable +G-DC +[ +G00652351 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located: one in Ventenat’s herbarium at G and a fragment in G-DC with the mention “M. B. Delessert 1816”. The later was therefore part of Ventenat’s herbarium before Delessert gave this fragment to Candolle (see introduction). The collection from Cels’s garden in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. A specimen with the mention “h. cels” in G-DC may represent a duplicate. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FF8BFAF6FE44E38C.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FF8BFAF6FE44E38C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ad519d780b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FF8BFAF6FE44E38C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +45. + + +Metrosideros lophantha +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 69. 1802. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +AUSTRALIA +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341539 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341540 +, +G00341541 +]!). + + + + + += + +Callistemon salignus +(Sm.) Colv. ex Sweet + + + + + +Notes +. – Three specimens of a single gathering have been located in Ventenat’s herbarium at G. They represent the plant cultivated in Cels’s garden. The more complete collection is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FF8BFCADFE68E012.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FF8BFCADFE68E012.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..97e09d0dadd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FF8BFCADFE68E012.xml @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +44. + + +Mesembryanthemum carinatum +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: tab. 109. 1805. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +SOUTH AFRICA +]: + +(Ventenat, Jard. Malmaison 2: tab. 109. 1805) ( +Fig. 8 +) + +. + + + + += + +Erepsia lacera +(Haw.) S. Liede + + + + + +Notes +. – No original material has been located of + +Mesembryanthemum carinatum +. + +Surprisingly this species is not mentioned in +Candolle (1828) +’s + +Mesembryanthemum + +L. treatment. Plate +109 in +the second volume of +Jardin de Malmaison +is therefore designated as the +lectotype +as long as no original material has been located. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FF8BFDCDFD62E659.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FF8BFDCDFD62E659.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..250664c4228 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE57525FF8BFDCDFD62E659.xml @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +43. + + +Melaleuca myrtifolia +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 47. 1804. + + + + + + +Lectotypus +(designated here): + +AUSTRALIA +: + + +sine loc., +L +. Ventenat s.n. + +( +holo- +: +G +[ +G00341463 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – Two gatherings have been located for this species. The specimen collected by +Louis Ventenat +in +Australia +in Ventenat’s herbarium and the cultivated specimen from Malmaison in G-DC [ +G00659788 +]. The Louis Ventenat collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FCDBFA0FFC3BE28F.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FCDBFA0FFC3BE28F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..78dcb391c7b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FCDBFA0FFC3BE28F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +56. + + +Phebalium squamulosum +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: tab. 102. 1805. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +AUSTRALIA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00340116 +]!; + + +isolecto-: G-DC [ +G00219424 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located: one in Ventenat’s herbarium at G and a fragment in G-DC with the mention “M. B. Delessert 1816” ( +Fig. 6 +). The later was therefore part of Ventenat’s herbarium before Delessert gave this fragment to Candolle (see introduction). The collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FCDBFC03FB65E0BE.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FCDBFC03FB65E0BE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e77bc7595b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FCDBFC03FB65E0BE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +55. + + +Pelargonium radicatum +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: tab. 65. 1804. + + + + + + +Typus: [ +SOUTH +AFRICA]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +(holo-: G [G00341658]!) ( +Fig. 9 +). + + + + += + +Geranium ciliatum +Andrews + +in Bot. Repos. 4: tab. 247. 1802 [nom. illeg.] [non + +G. ciliatum +Cav. + +]. + + + + +Notes +. – Ventenat in +Jardin de Malmaison +(1804: tab. 65) cited the later homonym + +Geranium ciliatum +Andrews + +as a synonym of his + +Pelargonium radicatum + +. We consider Ventenat’s name as independent of Andrews’ illegitimate name and not as a replacement name. We therefore consider the collection in the Ventenat herbarium as the +holotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FCDBFDE2FAF7E6BA.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FCDBFDE2FAF7E6BA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..810475f857d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FCDBFDE2FAF7E6BA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +54. + + +Oliveria decumbens +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 21. 1801. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +IRAQ +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341532 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341531 +]!, P-JU n° 10396 [ +P00667197 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – Two gatherings have been located. The original material cultivated in Cels’s garden in Ventenat’s herbarium with a duplicate in P-JU and +two specimens +from +Iraq +collected by +Bruguière +and Olivier in G-DC [ +G00664660 +, +G00664720 +]. The better preserved Cels’s garden collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is here designated as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FF88FECDFE96E758.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FF88FECDFE96E758.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a1519ffe931 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FF88FECDFE96E758.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +50. + + +Nemesia linearis +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: sub tab. 41. 1804. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +SOUTH AFRICA +: + +Cape +, +Sonnerat s.n. +( +P-JU +n° 6170 [ +P00667181 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – No specimen has been located at G. Ventenat clearly referred to Jussieu’s herbarium (“ex Juss.”) and the only specimen located for this species in P-JU is here designated as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FF8BF937FAF8E716.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FF8BF937FAF8E716.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..743d3f9adee --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FF8BF937FAF8E716.xml @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + + +53. + + +Notelaea ligustrina +Vent., Choix Pl. + +: sub tab. 25. 1804. + + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +AUSTRALIA +. +Tasmania +: + +Golfe d’Entrecasteaux +, +près la terre de Diemen +, + +Leschenault de la Tour +s.n. + +( +P-JU +n° 4889A [ +P00657313 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341528 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. – +The extant collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is +a sterile +clastotype. Ventenat clearly refers to Jussieu’s herbarium in the description of this species and the more complete material in P-JU is here designated as the +lectotype +. +Green (1968: 364) +in the revision of the genus + +Notelaea +Vent. + +cited as type a +Leschenault s.n. +collection “ex Herb. Jussieu & Ventenat”. This can hardly be accepted as an implicit lectotypification as no depository is indicated. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FF8BFAE3FE6BE3D6.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FF8BFAE3FE6BE3D6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..db74a442348 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FF8BFAE3FE6BE3D6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +52. + +Nicotiana undulata +Vent. + +, + + + + + +Jard. Malmaison 1: tab. 10. 1803 +[nom illeg.] [non + +N. undulata +Ruiz & Pavon + +]. + + + + + +Ξ + +Nicotiana suaveolens +Lehm. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +AUSTRALIA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341437 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341600 +]!) + +. + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located in Ventenat’s herbarium at G. They represent the plant cultivated in Joséphine’s garden. The more complete collection is here designated as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FF8BFDA1FD34E01A.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FF8BFDA1FD34E01A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..05b365953c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE77527FF8BFDA1FD34E01A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + + +51. + + +Nepeta longiflora +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 66. 1802. + + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +IRAN +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341508 +excl. left-hand specimen]!; + + +isolecto- +: +P-JU +n° 5385 [ +P00658191 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. – +The name + +Nepeta longiflora + +has been validated in +Descriptions +in 1802 based on a plant cultivated in Cels’s garden originating from a Bruguière and Olivier collection from Mt Albours in +Persia +. The only specimen in Ventenat’s herbarium is a mixed gathering with material from Cels’s garden and Bruguière and Olivier.The plant cultivated in Cels’s garden is designated here as the +lectotype +with a duplicate in P-JU. A single collection from Mt Albours collected by Bruguière and Olivier has been located in G-BOIS [G00330752] and is here considered as original material. Several collections from the expedition of Bruguière and Olivier in +Persia +are held at P [P04177880, P04177881, P04177886, P04177888] and one in G-DC [G006554857] but none seems to be from Mt Albours but rather from +Teheran +. They may also represent elements of original material of + +Nepeta longiflora +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FCDBFC3CFCFCE05D.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FCDBFC3CFCFCE05D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0694bcc101e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FCDBFC3CFCFCE05D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +62. + + +Poitea galegoides +Vent. + +in Mém. Cl. + +Sci. Math. Inst. Natl. +France +8: 17. 1807 + +[ + +cited in Choix Pl.: tab. 36. 1807]. + + + + + + +Typus: +DOMINICAN REPUBLIC / HAITI +: + +sine loc. +, +Poiteau s.n. +( +holo- +: +G +[ +G00370600 +]!; + + +iso- +: +P +[ +P02925169 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – +Lavin (1992: 45) +in his revision of the genus + +Poitea + +cited a Poiteau collection as +holotype +in G-DC herbarium. The collection held at G in Ventenat’s herbarium is clearly the +holotype +and no duplicate has been located in G-DC. Another Poiteau collection at P is considered as an isotype. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FCDBFE22FC02E6A8.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FCDBFE22FC02E6A8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..026d7fdd7cf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FCDBFE22FC02E6A8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +61. + + +Platylobium obcordatum +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: sub tab. 31. 1804. + + + + + +Ξ + +Bossiaea obcordata +(Vent.) Druce + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +AUSTRALIA +. +Queensland +: + +Nouvelle-Hollande SW +, +L +. Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00096594 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. – +Two +gatherings are present in +Ventenat’s +herbarium. +The +collection from +Queensland +[Nouvelle-Hollande +du Sud-Ouest +] and a cultivated specimen from +Malmaison +[ +G00096595 +]. We designate the specimen collected in the wild as the +lectotype +. +Thompson (2012) +failed to designate a +lectotype +in his revision of the genus + +Bossiaea +Vent. + +for eastern +Australia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FF88FECDFDF2E62F.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FF88FECDFDF2E62F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b72593b40f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FF88FECDFDF2E62F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +57. + + +Phylica oleifolia +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: sub tab. 57. 1804. + + + + + + + +Neotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +SOUTH +AFRICA]: + +“ +Hort. Reg. Paris +”, + +Anon +. s.n. + +( +P-JU +n° 16184 [ +P00667206 +] + +!) ( +Fig. 10 +). + + + + +Notes. – +No type material has been located for + +Phylica oleifolia + +. A specimen in the P-JU herbarium bears in Jussieu’s handwriting: “ +Phylica oleifolia Ventn. Mss. +”. This cultivated collection from the “Jardin du Roi” [ex Hort. Reg. Paris] is dated 1787. This garden is now known as the “Jardin des Plantes”. Serge Haemmerli (Z) currently undertakes +a revision +of the genus + +Phylica + +L. and considers + +Phylica oleifolia + +as a good species (Haemmerli, pers. comm.). The collection is here designated as +neotype +because it probably originates from the cultivated plant that Ventenat described in 1804. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FF8BF93EFC3BE4C6.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FF8BF93EFC3BE4C6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ea00d7b7da4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FF8BF93EFC3BE4C6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +60. + + +Picridium ligulatum +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: tab. 68. 1804. + + + + + +Ξ + +Reichardia ligulata +(Vent.) G. Kunkel & Sunding + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +MOROCCO +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341477 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. – +Two gatherings have been located for this species. A collection in G-DC [ +G004922721 +] represents the original material from Broussonet and a collection of cultivated material is still extant in Ventenat’s herbarium. We therefore designate the cultivated plant still in Ventenat’s herbarium as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FF8BFA8DFD62E3AE.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FF8BFA8DFD62E3AE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..da69899af46 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FF8BFA8DFD62E3AE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + + +59. + + +Phylica thymifolia +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 57. 1804 + +. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +SOUTH AFRICA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341550 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +G-DC +[ +G00476500 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located: one in Ventenat’s herbarium at G and a fragment in G-DC with the mention “M. B. Delessert 1816”. The later was therefore part of Ventenat’s herbarium before Delessert gave this fragment to Candolle (see introduction). The collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FF8BFCBFFD62E03D.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FF8BFCBFFD62E03D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..26a212aa046 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE97529FF8BFCBFFD62E03D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +58. + + +Phylica squarrosa +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: sub tab. 57. 1804. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +SOUTH AFRICA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341545 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +G-DC +[ +G00476386 +]!). + + + + + += + +Phylica plumosa +L. + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located: one in Ventenat’s herbarium at G and a fragment in G-DC with the mention “M. B. Delessert 1816”. The later was therefore part of Ventenat’s herbarium before Delessert gave this fragment to Candolle (see introduction). The collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE9752BFCDBFAA9FD36E4E4.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE9752BFCDBFAA9FD36E4E4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..28736070d65 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFE9752BFCDBFAA9FD36E4E4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +63. + + +Polygonum polygamum +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 65. 1802. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): [ + +UNITED STATES +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341643 +specimen on the left]!) + +( +Fig. 11 +). + + + + +Notes. – +The only collection of this species in Ventenat’s herbarium is mixed: a Ventenat collection from Cels’s garden and fragments of possible isotypes (G [G00341643 specimen on the right]) of + +Polygonella parvifolia +Michx. + +, a name published one year later ( +Michaux, 1803 +) (with a duplicate in P-JU n° 4290 [P00681748]). The latter name is probably based on the same original material as mentioned on the sheet by Vernon M. Bates ( +Fig. 11 +) but we failed to find convincing type material in P-MICH due to the complicated taxonomy of the mixed collections and leave this to a specialist of this genus. +Horton (1963: 198) +designated tab. 65 of +Descriptions +in 1802 as the +lectotype +for the name + +Polygonum polygamum + +but as original material has been found, our lectotypification supersedes the previous one. We designate Ventenat’s collection as the +lectotype +(specimen on the left of the sheet marked with an asterix). Recent molecular phylogenetic data show that + +Polygonella +Michx. + +is embedded in + +Polygonum + +L. and + +Polygonella + +is currently recognised at the subsectional level within + +Polygonum +( +Schuster et al., 2011 +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFCDBFC2CFB47E3FA.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFCDBFC2CFB47E3FA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a6b934981b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFCDBFC2CFB47E3FA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +68. + + +Redoutea heterophylla +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 11. 1800. + + + + + +Ξ + +Cienfuegosia heterophylla +(Vent.) Garcke + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(first step designated by +Fryxell, 1969: 211 +; second step designated here): + +UNITED STATES +. +Virgin Islands +: + +St. Thomas +, +Riedlé s.n. +( +G +[ +G00353087 +excl. fragm. packet]!; + + +isolecto- +: +FI +[ +FI006089 +] image seen, +P +[ +P02285953 +, +P02285954 +, +P02285955 +]!, +P-JU +n° 12403 [ +P00671970 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. +– +Fryxell (1969) +cited the material in Ventenat’s herbarium as +holotype +. However, this specimen [ +G00353087 +] is a mixed gathering and a second step lectotypification is necessary. A fragment packet contains original material obtained from the plant cultivated in Cels’s garden and from the +Museum in Paris +(“ +Mus +. Nat.”). On the same sheet is represented the material from +St. Thomas +collected by +Riedlé. We +designate the latter as the +lectotype +. +Four +more collections are all original material from +Riedlé +(or in +Baudin +herbarium as leg. +Riedlé +, see above) and considered as isolectotypes. + + +A specimen annotated in Ventenat’s hand “ +Redoutea heterophylla Hort. Cels +pl. XI“ and in D. F. K. v. Schlechtendal’s hand “Ventenat. W[illdenow]” (B-W n° 12834) is also available for the interpretation of this name. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFCDBFDA6FA12E6DB.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFCDBFDA6FA12E6DB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..083f618fca2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFCDBFDA6FA12E6DB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +67. + + +Ranunculus echinatus +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 73. 1802. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +UNITED STATES +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341564 +]!; + + +isolecto-: G-DC [ +G00130232 +]!). + + + + + += + +Ranunculus muricatus +L. + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located: one in Ventenat’s herbarium at G and a fragment in G-DC with the mention “ex herb. Ventenat”. The collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFF8BF8D1FBE3E745.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFF8BF8D1FBE3E745.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c14c8f72087 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFF8BF8D1FBE3E745.xml @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +66. + + +Rafnia retusa +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 53. 1804. + + + + + +Ξ + +Templetonia retusa +(Vent.) R. Br. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +AUSTRALIA +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341503 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. +– +Two +gatherings are present in +Ventenat’s +herbarium. A flowering specimen from +Cels’s +garden and the fruiting specimen [ +G00341504 +] originally brought back by his brother +Louis Ventenat +from +Australia +while he took part in the “Entrecasteaux Expedition” (see introduction). +The +flowering specimen from +Cels’s +garden is here designated as the +lectotype +. + +Ross +(1982: 3) + +in the revision of the genus + +Templetonia +R. Br. + +cited a specimen at G as +holotype +but +two specimens +exist representing two gatherings. This cannot be considered as an implicit lectotypification. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFF8BFA8AFD62E3F4.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFF8BFA8AFD62E3F4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4ef7d565ec7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFF8BFA8AFD62E3F4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +65. + + +Pultenaea ericoides +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 35. 1804. + + + + + +Ξ + +Aotus ericoides +(Vent.) G. Don + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +AUSTRALIA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00364790 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +G-DC +[ +G00488197 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located: one in Ventenat’s herbarium at G and a fragment in G-DC with the mention “M. B. Delessert 1816”. The later was therefore part of Ventenat’s herbarium before Delessert gave this fragment to Candolle (see introduction). The collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFF8BFDC0FDE8E031.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFF8BFDC0FDE8E031.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a0672224493 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752BFF8BFDC0FDE8E031.xml @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +64. + + +Pongamia sericea +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: sub tab. 28. 1803. + + + + + +Ξ + +Millettia sericea +(Vent.) Benth. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +INDONESIA +. +Java +: + +sine loc., + +IX.1794 +- +V +.1796 + +, +Lahaie 2189 +( +P +[ +P02753433 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +P +[ +P02753436 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. – +Ventenat in +Jardin de Malmaison +(1803: tab. 28) described a new genus + +Pongamia +Vent. + +based on the illeg. name + +P. glabra +Vent. The + +generic name + +Pongamia + +is a rejected name [nom. rejic.] against + +Millettia +Wight & Arn. + +, a conserved name [nom. cons.] published by +Wight +& Arnott in 1834. In the first volume of +Jardin de Malmaison +, Ventenat also published two further species as addenda: + +P. grandiflora +Vent. + +and + +P. sericea +Vent. Both + +species were based on collections made by Felix de Lahaie (1767-1829), while he served as gardener on the Entrecasteaux Expedition. Lahaie’s herbarium was bought by the MNHN in 1879 but some collections are also part of Ventenat’s herbarium ( +Guillaumin, 1910 +). Among the material in the Ventenat herbarium no specimens of + +Pongamia + +are extant and therefore the name + +P. sericea + +had to be lectotypified on collections kept in P. The name + +Pongamia grandiflora + +, currently accepted as + +Derris elliptica +(Wall.) Benth. + +, has been implicitly lectotypified by +Adema (2000: 420) +with a specimen in the P-JU herbarium (n° 15666). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752DFCDBF8CFFDB8E739.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752DFCDBF8CFFDB8E739.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..647fefb06a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEB752DFCDBF8CFFDB8E739.xml @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + + +69. + + +Robinia viscosa +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 4. 1800 + +. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): [ + +UNITED STATES +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341607 +]!; + + +isolecto-: P-JU n° 15222 [ +P00667174 +]!). + + + + + +Fig. 11. – +Mixed gathering on the single sheet of + +Polygonum polygamum +Vent. + +at G [see under n° 63 for further explanations]. + + + + +Notes. – +Two +gatherings are present in +Ventenat’s +herbarium: the collection from +Michaux +and a cultivated specimen from +Cels’s +garden. +We +designate the cultivated specimen as the +lectotype +because it is a more complete collection with a complete inflorescence. +An +isolectotype from +Cels’s +garden has been located in P-JU. +Michaux’s +collection from +South Carolina +( +“ +Caroline méridionale”) is considered as an element of original material (G [ +G00341606 +], G-DC [ +G00478142 +]!, P [ +P02924476 +], P-MICH [ +P00667178 +]). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFCDBFBCDFAF2E312.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFCDBFBCDFAF2E312.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..36422edbf9d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFCDBFBCDFAF2E312.xml @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +75. + + +Spartium parviflorum +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 87. 1802 + +. + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +TURKEY +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341544 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341537 +]!). + + + + + += + +Gonocytisus angulatus +(L.) Spach + + + + + +Notes. – +The +name + +Spartium parviflorum + +was validated in + +Descriptions + +in 1802. +It +is based on a specimen cultivated in +Cels’s +garden originating from a +Bruguière +and +Olivier +collection from +Turkey +(Mundania). +Two +specimens in +Ventenat’s +herbarium from +Cels’s +garden have been located and the more complete collection [ +G00341544 +] is here designated as the +lectotype +. +Five +specimens collected in +Turkey +by +Bruguière +and +Olivier +have been located in G-BOIS [ +G00341543 +], G-DC [ +G00477269 +] and P [ +P02953058 +, +P02953060 +, +P02953062 +]. These are all considered as elements of original material. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFCDBFD58FA2FE6F9.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFCDBFD58FA2FE6F9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..105a29d2045 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFCDBFD58FA2FE6F9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +74. + + +Solenandria cordifolia +P. Beauv. ex Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: tab. 69. 1804. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +UNITED +STATES + +: +“ +Caroline +”, + +Palisot de Beauvois +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341549 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341547 +, +G00341548 +]!). + + + + + += + +Galax urceolata +(Poir.) Brummitt + + + + + +Notes +. – Three specimens of a single gathering collected by + +Ambroise Marie François Joseph Palisot +de Beauvois + +(1752- 1820) have been located in Ventenat’s herbarium at G. The more complete collection is here designated as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFCDBFECDFCD9E74F.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFCDBFECDFCD9E74F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c569501b035 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFCDBFECDFCD9E74F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + + +73. + + +Sideritis pullulans +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 98. 1803. + + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +SYRIA +: + +sine loc. +, + +Bruguière +& +Olivier +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341497 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. – +Two gatherings are present in Ventenat’s herbarium. +A sterile +cultivated specimen from Cels’s garden [ +G00341642 +] and the specimen from +Syria +collected by +Bruguière +and Olivier. The latter is a flowering specimen and designated as the +lectotype +. No specimen has been located in P. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFF8BFAEDFEAEE24C.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFF8BFAEDFEAEE24C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bea32e1626f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFF8BFAEDFEAEE24C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,186 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + + +72. + + +Salvia compressa +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 59. 1801. + + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +IRAQ +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341501 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +C +[ +C10013209 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. – +The +name + +Salvia compressa + +was validated in + +Descriptions + +in 1801 based on a specimen cultivated in +Cels’s +garden originating from a +Bruguière +and +Olivier +collection from +Iraq +(between +Mosul +and +Baghdad +). +The +only specimen in +Ventenat’s +herbarium from +Cels’s +garden is designated as the +lectotype +with a duplicate in C. +Four +specimens collected between +Mosul +and +Baghdad +by +Bruguière +and +Olivier +have been located in G-BOIS [ +G00330751 +] and P [ +P02888639 +, +P02888640 +, +P02888641 +]. +They +are here considered as elements of original material. + +Hedge +(1982: 426) + +in his revision for + +Fl. Iranica + +did not specify the herbarium where the type specimen has been desposited; this cannot be considered as an implicit lectotypification. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFF8BFC58FDAAE019.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFF8BFC58FDAAE019.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..86b49c49584 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFF8BFC58FDAAE019.xml @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +71. + +Salvia acuminata +Vent. + +, + + + +Descr. Pl. Nouv.: tab. 50. 1801 +[nom. illeg.] [non + +S. acuminata +Ruiz & Pav. + +]. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +UNITED STATES +. +South Carolina +: + +Michaux s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341608 +]!; + + +isolecto-: P-JU n°5261 [ +P00657979 +]). + + + + + += + +Salvia azurea +Michx. ex Vahl + + + + + +Notes. – +Two gatherings are present in +Ventenat’s +herbarium. +The Michaux +collection from +Carolina +and a cultivated specimen from +Cels’s +garden [ +G00341573 +]. We designate the Michaux collection as the +lectotype +because it better represent the morphology of the plant in the wild. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFF8BFD8DFE44E64C.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFF8BFD8DFE44E64C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..03d0576dbc5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752DFF8BFD8DFE44E64C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + + +70. + + +Rosa kamtchatica +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 67. 1802. + + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +RUSSIA +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341465 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341452 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located in Ventenat’s herbarium at G. They represent the plant cultivated in Cels’s garden. The more complete collection is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752FFCDBF9F6FDB4E479.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752FFCDBF9F6FDB4E479.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..430231176ef --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFED752FFCDBF9F6FDB4E479.xml @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +76. + + + +Spathodea corymbosa +Vent. + +in Mém. Cl. + +Sci. Math. Inst. Natl. +France +8: 19. 1807 + +[ + +cited in Choix Pl.: tab. 40. 1807]. + + + + + +Ξ + +Bignonia corymbosa +(Vent.) L.G. Lohmann + + + + + + + +Typus: +TRINIDAD +: + +sine loc., Riedlé s.n. +( +holo- +: +P +[ +P00481551 +]!) ( +Fig. 12 +). + + + + + +Notes +. – No collection of this species has been found at G. A collection at P clearly comes from the Ventenat herbarium. It is the only example we have found of a Ventenat label at P. It is designated here as the +holotype +( +Fig. 12 +). This collection may have been in the herbarium of one of Ventenat’s contemporaries when his own herbarium has been sold to Delessert (see introduction). Both +Lohmann (2008) +and +Lohmann & Taylor (2012) +also considered this Riedlé collection as +holotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF7511FCDBF932FE25E4A7.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF7511FCDBF932FE25E4A7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a5c4ccf978a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF7511FCDBF932FE25E4A7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,167 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +82. + + +Tournefortia laurifolia +Vent., Choix Pl. + +: tab. 2. 1803. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +UNITED STATES +. +Puerto Rico +: + +sine loc., Riedlé s.n. +( +P +[ +P00607005 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +P +[ +P00607006 +, +P00607007 +, +P00607008 +]!). + + + + + += + +Tournefortia maculata +Jacq. + + + + + +Fig. 13. – +Original material of + +Statice fasciculata +Vent. + +from the Tournefort herbarium in Paris at P-TRF. [© Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris] + + + + +Notes. – +No +specimen was located in +Ventenat’s +herbarium. +Several +duplicates of the original collections of +Riedlé +from +Puerto Rico +have been found at P. +The +collection [ +P00607005 +] is designated here as the +lectotype +as it clearly served for tab. 2 published in +Choix +in 1803. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFCDBFAFEFB12E3A8.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFCDBFAFEFB12E3A8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..97e982a144a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFCDBFAFEFB12E3A8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +81. + + +Styphelia gnidium +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 23. 1803. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +AUSTRALIA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison, +Ventenat s.n. +( +P-JU +n° 7364+C [ +P00667208 +]!) + +. + + + + += + +Leucopogon parviflorus +(Andrews) Lindl. + + + + + +Notes. – +The +only collection found in +Ventenat’s +herbarium seems to represent two gatherings from +Botany Bay +in +Australia +. +Only +the specimen on the right-hand of G [ +G00341499 +] seems to match the morphology of the species. A more trustful collection has been located in P-JU. It is a cultivated specimen from Malmaison given by Ventenat to Jussieu in 1805. We designate the latter collection as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFCDBFD59FCD1E1EC.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFCDBFD59FCD1E1EC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f6795029540 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFCDBFD59FCD1E1EC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +80. + + +Sterculia rubiginosa +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: sub tab. 91. 1805. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +INDONESIA +. +Java +: + +sine loc +., +Commerson s.n. +( +P-JU +n° 12445 [ +P00667180 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +P +[ +P06702127 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. – + +Ventenat in +Jardin de Malmaison + +(1805: sub tab. 91) noted: “ +Java. Ex. Herbar. +D.D. de Jussieu et Thouin”. In his revision of the genus + +Sterculia + +L. in +Malesia +, + +Tantra +(1976) + +implicitly designated the +lectotype +at P, i.e. + +Thouin +462 + +, that he had not seen [by mentioning n.v.], with a duplicate at LINN. +The Smith +herbarium at LINN contains several collection of the +Thouin +herbarium ( + +Stearn +, 1988 + +). +It +is not clear if these two collections given by + +Tantra +(1976) + +as type material are duplicates of the same gathering. +The Thouin +herbarium contains several of +Commerson’s +collections but we prefer to designate the P-JU collection with a duplicate in the general collection in P as the +lectotype +. +No +collection has been found at G. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFF8BF990FB6BE74F.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFF8BF990FB6BE74F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..de67a5b237b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFF8BF990FB6BE74F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +79. + + +Sterculia monosperma +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: tab. 91. 1805. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(first step designated by +Tantra, 1976: 154 +; second step designated here): + +[ +CHINA +]: + +cultivated in India [more probably in Indonesia], +Anon. s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341673 +]!). + + + + + +Notes. – +Tantra (1976: 154) +designated a collection in “Herb. de Ventenat” at G as the type with no more information. This cannot be accepted as an implicit lectotypification since two gatherings exists at G in Ventenat’s herbarium: the collection cultivated in Cels’s garden and a collection probably from +Indonesia +. The origin of the collection that Ventenat received is doubtful. + +Sterculia monosperma + +is endemic to +China +, the Malay Peninsula and Java (Tranta, 1976). Ventenat coined the name + +S. monosperma + +because his specimen possessed a single seeded fruit. The fruiting collection of doubtful origin at G [G00341673] is therefore designated here as the +lectotype +. The cultivated collection in flower from Cels’s garden [G00358626] is considered as an element of original material. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFF8BFBCBFD96E334.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFF8BFBCBFD96E334.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5e17f8cad0c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFF8BFBCBFD96E334.xml @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +78. + + +Sterculia grandiflora +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: sub tab. 91. 1805. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + + +MAURITIUS + +: + +sine loc., Commerson s.n. +( +P-JU +n° 12446 [ +P00667176 +]!; + + +isolecto- +G +[ +G00015287 +]!). + + + + + += + +Cola acuminata +(P. Beauv.) Schott & Endl. + + + + + +Notes. – +After a short latin diagnosis, Ventenat stated in + +Jardin de Malmaison + +2: sub tab. 91: “ex +Herbario D. de Jussieu +, ex +Herbarium D. de Lamarck +”. One specimen has been found at G and this collection is a clastotype of a collection by +Philibert Commerson +(1727-1773) from +Mauritius +where the plant is cultivated. +We +designate the collection in P-JU as the +lectotype +as it is more complete and has been used by Ventenat for the description of this species.The two collections in P-LA [ +P00287711 +, +P00287712 +] are considered as elements of original material. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFF8BFE42FD76E6FF.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFF8BFE42FD76E6FF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bcdf1a79d54 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFEF752FFF8BFE42FD76E6FF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +77. + + +Statice fasciculata +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 38. 1801. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +FRANCE +. +Corsica +]: + +Hort. Cels, +Ventenat s.n. +( +G +[ +G00341427 +]!). + + + + + += + +Armeria pungens +(Link) Hoffmanns. & Link + + + + + +Notes. – +The +name + +Statice fasciculata + +was validated on the basis of a collection brought back from +Corsica +by +La Billardière +and cultivated in +Cels’s +garden. +After +the latin diagnosis, +Ventenat +cited two collections from +Herb. Vaillant. On +the only sheet at G, the text of one of these collections is copied and placed near the fragment packet. +We +believe that +Ventenat +had probably obtained from P a clastotype of +P05406334 +and we therefore consider the collection at G as a mixed gathering. +We +designate the cultivated specimen from +Cels’s +garden as the +lectotype +. +The La Billardière +collections present in +Webb’s +herbarium at FI-W [ +FI016966 +, +FI016967 +] are considered as elements of original material as also the two collections in P [ +P05406334 +] and P-TRF [ +P00666376 +] ( +Fig. 13 +) respectively. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFCC2FC2BFA89E334.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFCC2FC2BFA89E334.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..81f8ee9c6dc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFCC2FC2BFA89E334.xml @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +6. + + +Andromeda cassinefolia +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 60. 1801. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +UNITED STATES +]: + +Hort. Cels +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341453 +]!). + + + + + += + +Zenobia pulverulenta +(W. Bartram ex Willd.) Pollard + + + + + +Notes +. – In 1801, Ventenat validated in +Descriptions +the name + +Andromeda cassinefolia + +based on a specimen from material cultivated in Cels’s garden [G00341453] designated here as the +lectotype +. In the second volume of +Jardin de Malmaison +(under tab. 79 published in 1804), Ventenat treated this taxon under the name + +A +. +cassinefolia +var. +nuda + +, a +nom. nud. +This taxon was illustrated by Redouté based on a second collection [G00408075] that is still extant in Ventenat’s herbarium. We consider the second collection as an element of original material of + +A. cassinefolia + +because Ventenat in 1801 already discussed the variability of his new taxon and the second collection cited in 1804 was very likely already in his possession in 1801. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFCC2FE62FA23E6DE.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFCC2FE62FA23E6DE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d5214910c99 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFCC2FE62FA23E6DE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +5. + + +Ancistrum repens +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 6. 1800. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +PERU +]: + +“individu de pleine terre”, +Hort. Cels +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341457 +]!). + + + + + += + +Acaena ovalifolia +Ruiz & Pav. + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens are represented in Ventenat’s herbarium that clearly represent two gatherings from Cels’s garden. One collection is from the open ground (“individu de pleine terre”) and the other from the orangery (“individu d’Orangerie”) (G [ +G00341456 +]). We designate the first specimen as the +lectotype +as it better represents the species in the wild, despite the fact that the second specimen from the orangery was very likely the one to have been used for the plate. The specimen in the centre of the sheet n° +14214 in +P-JU [ +P00667169 +] is from Cels’s garden but no information of its exact provenance is given. It may represent an isolectotype. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFF72F9F0FAC8E499.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFF72F9F0FAC8E499.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9983f9d198c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFF72F9F0FAC8E499.xml @@ -0,0 +1,159 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +4. + + +Anamenia coriacea +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 22. 1803. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated by +Rasmussen, 1979: 27 +): + +[ +SOUTH AFRICA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +P-JU +n° 10574 [ +P00667188 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00406216 +]!, G-DC [ +G00144870 +]!). + + + + + += + +Anemone vesicatoria +(L. f.) + +Prantl + + + + +Notes +. – +Rasmussen (1979: 27) +designated a +lectotype +at P-JU for + +Anemone coriacea + +now accepted under the name + +A. vesicatoria +. + +The collection held at P-JU is clearly a duplicate of the one at G, both representing the same gathering from the plant cultivated at Malmaison with Ventenat’s handwriting. +Rasmussen (1979) +’s lectotypification on a specimen at P-JU is unfortunate, but has priority. The G specimens (in G and G-DC) are considered here as isolectotypes. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFF72FBA8FE24E317.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFF72FBA8FE24E317.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..97442e5c0b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFF72FBA8FE24E317.xml @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +3. + + +Anagallis fruticosa +Vent., Choix Pl. + +: tab. 14. 1803. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +M +OROCCO + +: +Mogador +[Essaouira], + +Broussonet +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341554 +]!; + + +isolecto-: B-W [B-W 03542-01 0]!, G-DC [ +G00138354 +]!). + + + + + += + +Anagallis monelli +L. + + + + + +Notes +. – Three collections of a single gathering have been located. It represents the specimen collected by +Broussonet +in Mogador [now +Essaouira +], +Morocco +. We know that Delessert and Candolle exchanged herbarium specimens. The Broussonet collection in Ventenat’s herbarium is therefore designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFF72FD20FE6BE15F.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFF72FD20FE6BE15F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e892f029eb0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFF72FD20FE6BE15F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +2. + + +Alyssum mutabile +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 85. 1802. + + + + + +Ξ + +Berteroa mutabilis +(Vent.) DC. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +WESTERN +ASIA. “ +Levant +”]: + +Hort. Cels +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341571 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341570 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located in Ventenat’s herbarium in G representing the plant cultivated in Cels’s garden. The more complete collection is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFF72FEB8FD27E7C7.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFF72FEB8FD27E7C7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..98d984206cf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753AFF72FEB8FD27E7C7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +1. + + +Achillea aspleniifolia +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 95. 1802. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +UNITED STATES +]: + +Hort. Cels +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341485 +]!). + + + + + += + +Achillea millefolium +L. + + + + + +Notes +. – Two different collections have been located in Ventenat’s herbarium at G. The plant collected by +Michaux +from his travel to +North America +(G [ +G00341484 +]) and the plant cultivated in Cels’s garden. The latter is designated here as the +lectotype +as it is more complete and clearly served primarily for the description of + +Achillea aspleniifolia +. + +No specimen has been located at P. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753BFCC2F991FD9CE4D9.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753BFCC2F991FD9CE4D9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..416e6ecd3d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFA753BFCC2F991FD9CE4D9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +7. + + +Antirrhinum bipartitum +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 82. 1802. + + + + + +Ξ + +Linaria bipartita +(Vent.) Willd. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(first step designated by +Viano, 1978: 79 +; second step designated here): + +[ +MORROCO +]: + +Hort. Cels +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00190702 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00190703 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – +Viano (1978: 79) +in his revision of the genus + +Linaria +sect. +Versicolores +(Benth.) Wettst. + +in the Mediterranean basin cited a “herb. Ventenat” specimen at G as type. +This +implicit lectotypification needs a second step designation, as two collections exist in the +Ventenat +herbarium. +We +designate the more complete sheet as the +lectotype +. +Four +sheets of original material from +Broussonet +from +Morocco +are held in G-DC [ +G00478868 +] and one more in the +Willdenow +herbarium in B-W [B-W 11278-01 0]. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFB753BFCDBFD5BFC2CE3A9.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFB753BFCDBFD5BFC2CE3A9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3e0747d15c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFB753BFCDBFD5BFC2CE3A9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,213 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + + +10. + + +Bejaria racemosa +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 51. 1801. + + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated by +Clemants, 1995: 71 +): + +UNITED STATES +. +Florida +: + + +Michaux +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00342248 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +P +[ +P02441846 +, +P02441849 +]!, +P-MICH +[ +P00667179 +, +P00667182 +, +P00667183 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – +The +name + +Bejaria racemosa + +was validated on the basis of a plant in +Cels’s +garden raised from seeds brought back by +Bosc +from a botanical garden in +Charles-Town +[Charleston, Boston], possibly the garden founded after 1786 by +Michaux +“ten miles from Charlestown” ( +Ramsay, 1858 +). +Ventenat +also mentioned in the protologue that +Michaux +discovered the plant in +Florida +. +No +cultivated specimen exists in +Ventenat’s +herbarium but a single specimen from +Florida +, i.e. the +Michaux +collection, is extant. +This +collection has been designated as the +lectotype +by + +Clemants +(1995: 71) + +. A collection from +Cels’s +garden exists in the G-DC herbarium [ +G00454403 +] and is here considered as original material. +Duplicates of Michaux +collections in P and P-MICH are considered as isolectotypes. Another collection in G-DC [ +G00454405 +] represents a cultivated plant from Malmaison but it seems that it was collected after the validation of the name in 1801 and is here not considered as original material. + + +Michaux (1803) +published the name + +B. paniculata +Michx. + +, [nom. illeg.] [non + +B. paniculata +Cels ex Dum. Cours. + +], a homotypic synonym of + +B. racemosa + +based on the same gathering as Ventenat. Ventenat in +Choix +(1808: sub tab. 52) already considered these names as synonyms and wrote: “L’auteur de la Flore de l’Amérique Septentrionale [i.e. Michaux] a cru devoir substituer au nom spécifique de racemosa celui de paniculata.” [“The author of the +Flore de l’Amérique Septentrionale +[i.e. Michaux] felt that he had to substitute the specific name racemosa with paniculata.”] + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFB753BFF8BF996FAE7E741.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFB753BFF8BF996FAE7E741.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9cf13f196d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFB753BFF8BF996FAE7E741.xml @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +9. + + +Ardisia crenulata +Vent., Choix Pl. + +: tab. 5. 1803. + + + + + +Ξ + +Parathesis crenulata +(Vent.) Hook. + +f. ex Hemsl. + + + + + +Ty p u s +: + +D +O M I N I C A N R E P U B L I C / H A I T I +: + +“ +S t. Domingo +”, + +Poiteau +s.n. + +( +holo- +: +G +[ +G00341511 +]; + +iso-: G [G00341669]!, P-JU n° 7315+B [P00671356]!). + + + + +Notes +. – Howard (1989: 43) designated plate 5 [tab. 5] in +Choix +in 1803 as the +lectotype +. The finding of its +holotype +, +Poiteau s.n +., the only extant collection in the Ventenat herbarium, supersedes this lectotypification. Two duplicates of Poiteau’s collection have been located in the general herbarium at G and and in P-JU herbarium respectively and are here considered as isotypes. + + +A specimen annotated by Carl Ludwig Willdenow “ +Ardisia +crenula” [sic] and by Dietrich Friedrich Karl von Schlechtendal “Seidel Paris W [illdenow]” [B-W 044901-01 0] was probably collected by the gardener Jacob Friedrich Seidel, albeit almost certainly after 1803 and therefore illegible for typification. The latter is reported to have worked from 1810 to c. +1812 in +the “Jardin des Plantes” in Paris ( +Riedel & Riedel, 2010 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFB753BFF8BFE2DFEA3E332.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFB753BFF8BFE2DFEA3E332.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eb0eba28cf4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFB753BFF8BFE2DFEA3E332.xml @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +8. + + +Apium prostratum +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: tab. 81. 1804-1805. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +AUSTRALIA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00359756 +]!; + + +isolecto-: G-DC [ +G00478844 +]!). + + + + + + += + + +Apium prostratum +Labill., Voy. Rech. Pérouse + +1: 141. 1800 + +[nom. nud.], + +Nov. Holl. Pl. +1: 76, tab. 103. 1805 + +[nom. illeg.] + +. + + + + + + +Typus: +AUSTRALIA +. +Tasmania +: + +Van Diemen +, + +La Billardière +s.n. + +( +holo- +: +FI-W +[ +FI016964 +] image seen; + + +iso- +: +B-W +[ +B-W 5989-01 0 +]!, +G-DC +[ +G00478846 +]!, +FI-W +[ +FI016965 +] image seen, +P +[ +P00834725 +, +P00834726 +]!, +P-JU +n° 10157 [ +P00307178 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – +The +seeds of this new species were received from +Hamelin +who took part in the +Baudin Expedition +to the +Southern Territories +(see introduction). A single gathering exists in +Ventenat’s +herbarium at G, a plant cultivated in +Malmaison +with a fragment in G-DC. +The +collection in +Ventenat’s +herbarium is designated here as the +lectotype +. + +Ventenat in +Jardin de Malmaison + +(1804-1805: tab. 81) wrote in the note following the species description that his new species seems to be the same [“…paroît…”] as the one mentioned by + + +La Billardière + +(1800: 141) + +. + +Apium prostratum +Labill. + +is a +nom. nud. +in 1800 but was validly published in + +September 1805 + +by + +La Billardière +(1804 + +-1805: 76, tab. 103). However, Ventenat’s name had been published between + +December 1804 +and +January 1805 + +( +Stearn, 1939 +) and antedates +La Billardière’s. Both +names are independent and not based on the same types. + +Short +(1979: 217) + +combined both names and mentioned a type in P as the +holotype +and an isotype in G-DC. +In +the latter herbarium, original material of both names are present. A +holotype +and two isotypes of +La Billardière’s +later homonym are present respectively in FI-W, and in B-W and P-JU. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFB753DFCDBF933FD2AE7B9.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFB753DFCDBF933FD2AE7B9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..99f3c6b6b03 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFB753DFCDBF933FD2AE7B9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +11. + + +Caladium nymphaeifolium +Vent. in Mag + +. Encycl. 4: 471. 1801 + +[cited in Descr. Pl. Nouv.: sub tab. 30. 1801]. + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +INDONESIA +]: + +“ +Wali Ila +”, (Rheede, Hort. Malab. 9: tab. 22. 1689). + + + + + += + +Colocasia esculenta +(L.) Schott + + + + + +Fig. 4. – + +Poiretia punctata +(Willd.) Desv. + +Specimen of a collection from Brazil sent by Ventenat to the Empress Joséphine, kept at G. + + + + +Notes +. – Despite a search for original material of this species at G and P, no collection has been located. The name + +Caladium nymphaeifolium + +was validated by Ventenat in +Descriptions +in +1801 in +the text below the description of + +Caladium bicolor +(Ait.) Vent. + +with no illustration but with a clear reference to +Hortus Malabricus +vol. 9 ( +Rheede, 1689 +): “une espèce que j’ai trouvée dans l’herbier Jussieu, qui est figurée dans le IXème vol. de +l’Hort +. +Malabar +., t. 22, et à laquelle j’ai donné le nom de + +nymphaeifolium + +.” [“a species that I found in the Jussieu herbarium, which is illustrated in the ninth vol. of the +Hort. Malabar. +, t. 22, and to which I gave the name of + +nymphaeifolium + +.”]. Until original material is located, we designate tab. +22 in +Rheede (1689) +as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFCDBFA7BFA26E299.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFCDBFA7BFA26E299.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5f7b4b06c77 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFCDBFA7BFA26E299.xml @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +16. + +Cheiranthus linearis +Vent. + +, + + + + +Jard. Malmaison 2: sub tab. 83. 1804 +[nom. illeg.] [non + +C. linearis +Forssk. + +]. + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +S PAIN +. +Canary Islands +, +Tenerife +]: + +Hort. Cels, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341602 +]!). + + + + + += + +Erysimum semperflorens +(Schousb.) Wettst. + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens are present in Ventenat’s herbarium that clearly represent two gatherings. One of the collections came from Cels’s garden and the other from Malmaison [G00341604]. The first gathering is a better specimen and is here designated as the lectotype. Other collections exist from the material brought back by Broussonet while he served as Commissioner of commercial relations in Tenerife in the early 19 +th +century ( +Candolle, 1809 +). Those collections are here considered as elements of original material (G-DC [G00149541]). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFCDBFC96FB10E06F.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFCDBFC96FB10E06F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..659c65738af --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFCDBFC96FB10E06F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +15. + + +Celsia lanceolata +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 27. 1801. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +IRAQ +]: + +Hort. Cels +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341500 +]!; + + +isolecto-: G-BOIS [ +G00330749 +]!). + + + + + += + +Verbascum assurense +Bornm. & Hand. + +-Mazz. + + + + +Notes +. – The name + +Celsia lanceolata + +has been validated in +Descriptions +in 1801 based on a Bruguière and Olivier collection from +Iraq +(between Mosul and +Baghdad +) and cultivated in Cels’s garden. The specimen in Ventenat’s herbarium from Cels’s garden is designated here as the +lectotype +with a duplicate in G-BOIS. Four specimens collected between Mosul and +Baghdad +by Bruguière and Olivier have been located in G-BOIS [G00330748, G00330750] and P [P03287379, P03287380]. They are here considered as elements of original material. +Huber-Morath (1981: 25) +in his revision of + +Verbascum + +L. for +Flora Iranica +did not cite any type for + +Celsia lanceolata + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFCDBFECDFA2FE632.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFCDBFECDFA2FE632.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c72ecc4e8f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFCDBFECDFA2FE632.xml @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +14. + + +Casuarina distyla +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 62. 1802. + + + + + +Ξ + +Allocasuarina distyla +(Vent.) + +L.A.S. Johnson + + + + + + +Typus: [ +AUSTRALIA +]: + +Hort. Cels +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +holo- +: +G +[ +G00341454 +]!; + +iso-: NSW [NSW62357] image seen). + + + + +Notes. +– Johnson (1992: 75) transferred + +Casuarina distyla + +to his new genus + +Allocasuarina + +L.A.S. Johnson. The author designated the collection at G from Cels’s garden as the +lectotype +.Only one collection is extant inVentenat’s herbarium and should therefore be considered as the +holotype +.A clastotype is present in NSW and should be considered as the isotype.The two other collections mentioned by Johnson (1992: 75) in K [K000872501] (Herb. Forsyth. purchased 1835) and P [P00735055] (“donné par Bonpland en 1835”) have been very likely collected later in Cels’s garden and are here not considered as isotypes. The provenance of the plant has been recorded as “Cap de Diemen” in +Tasmania +but is clearly from +New South Wales +(Johnson, 1992). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFF8BFBB6FDE9E26C.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFF8BFBB6FDE9E26C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d179a20debb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFF8BFBB6FDE9E26C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,230 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +13. + + +Casearia ulmifolia +Vahl ex Vent., Choix Pl. + +: sub tab. 46. 1808 + +. + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(first step designated by +Sleumer, 1980: 324 +; second step designated here): + +TRINIDAD +: + +1778, +Ryan 20 +( +C +[ + +C +10012565 + +] image seen; + + +isolecto- +: +BM +[ +BM000624343 +] image seen, +BR +[ +BR0000005104826 +] image seen, +C +[ + +C +10012566 + +, + +C +10012567 + +, + +C +10012568 + +, + +C +10012569 + +, + +C +10012570 + +, + +C +10012571 + +] images seen, +G +[ +G00364133 +]!, +L +[ +L0010781 +] image seen, +P-JU +n° 16215 [ +P00678826 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – +Ventenat +validated +Vahl’s +name by publishing a few comparative leaf characters: “[bords de feuille] finement dentés en scie”. + +Sleumer +(1980: 324) + +correctly considered the type as being held at C. +His +implicit lectotypification needs a second step designation as seven sheets exist at C. +In +their revision of the + +Casearia ulmifolia + +complex, + +Marquete +& +Mansano +(2012: 201) + +failed to properly designate a single sheet at C as the +lectotype +. +We +designate the most complete sheet in C as the +lectotype +. +Several +isolectotypes are known, among them one in +Ventenat’s +herbarium. +We +are not in agreement with previous authors ( + +Sleumer +, 1980 + +; + +Marquete +& +Mansano +, 2012 + +) and do not consider the collection in G-DC [ +G00476917 +] as elements of original material. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFF8BFD0DFDD9E152.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFF8BFD0DFDD9E152.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c149030a422 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFD753DFF8BFD0DFDD9E152.xml @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +12. + + +Calendula chrysanthemifolia +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 56. 1804. + + + + + +Ξ + +Dimorphotheca chrysanthemifolia +(Vent.) DC. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +SOUTH AFRICA +]: + +Hort. Malmaison +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341480 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341479 +]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – Two specimens of a single gathering have been located in Ventenat’s herbarium at G. It represents the plant cultivated in Empress Joséphine’s garden. The more complete collection is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753EFCC2FE43FB76E088.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753EFCC2FE43FB76E088.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..109feb7c557 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753EFCC2FE43FB76E088.xml @@ -0,0 +1,258 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +20. + + +Colletia ephedra +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: sub tab. 92. 1803 + +. + + + + +Ξ + +Retanilla ephedra +(Vent.) Brongn. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(first step designated by +Tortosa, 1992: 235 +; second step designated here): + +CHILE +: + + +sine loc., +Dombey +s.n. + +( +P +[ +P01818929 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +G +[ +G00341460 +, +G00341672 +]!, +G-DC +[ +G00476003 +]!, +P +[ +P01818930 +, +P01818931 +]!, +P-JU +n° 16153 [ +P00678779 +]!). + + + + + += + + +Colletia obcordata +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 92. 1803. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +CHILE +]: + +Hort. Cels +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341459 +]!; + + +isolecto- +: +G +[ +G00341458 +]!, +G-DC +[ +G00476011 +]!, +P-JU +n° 16157 [ +P00667163 +]!) + + + + + +Notes +. – Ventenat in +Descriptions +(1803: sub tab. 92) validated the name + +Colletia ephedra + +based on a Joseph Dombey (1742-1794) specimen from +Peru +. Dombey was a French explorer who collected in +Chile +, +Peru +and +Brazil +( +Stafleu & Cowan, 1986 +). +Tortosa (1992: 235) +designated an +holotype +specimen at P. His implicit lectotypification needs a second step designation as three sheets exist at P. We designate here the most complete sheet at P as the +lectotype +. Several duplicates have been found. +Tortosa (1992: 235) +corrected the origin of the material collected by Dombey as from +Chile +and not +Peru +. + +Colletia ephedra + +has been illustrated in +Choix +tab. +16 in +late 1803 or early 1804. + + +Two specimens of a single gathering of + +C. obcordata + +have been located in Ventenat’s herbarium at G. It represents the plant cultivated in Cels’s garden. The most complete collection is designated here as the +lectotype +. +Tortosa (1992: 235) +designated the type specimen at P but no collection has been located at P in the general collection. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753EFF72FA93FA4CE466.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753EFF72FA93FA4CE466.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..66a54cac0f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753EFF72FA93FA4CE466.xml @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +19. + + +Clerodendrum viscosum +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: tab. 25. 1803. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +INDONESIA +. +Java +]: + +Hort. Cels +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341557 +]!). + + + + + += + +Clerodendrum infortunatum +L. + + + + + +Notes +. – When validating the name + +Clerodendrum viscosum +Ventenat + +specifically wrote that his species concept excluded what was named + +C. infortunatum + +L. in P-JU. Two collections exist in Ventenat’s herbarium. A cultivated specimen from Cels’s garden and a second with two leaves with a label “Dedit Juss., exclusis syn. et figuris Rhumphii et Burmanii” and two additional leaves with a blank label attached. The two leaves “Dedit Juss.” clearly represent what Ventenat called + +C. infortunatum + +and should not be considered as type material of his + +C. viscosum + +. No further material has been located at P-JU. In spite of any additional information regarding the two leaves present on the sheet we prefer to consider this specimen [G00341644] as original material whereas the cultivated plant from Cels’s garden is designated here as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753EFF72FD35FEDCE036.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753EFF72FD35FEDCE036.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..78756df5ae4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753EFF72FD35FEDCE036.xml @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +18. + + +Chrysanthemum praealtum +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 43. 1801. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +IRAN +: + +Mt. Albourg +, + +Bruguière +& +Olivier +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341493 +]!; + + +probable isolecto-: +G +[ +G00341494 +]!). + + + + + += + +Tanacetum parthenium +(L.) + +Sch. Bip. + + + + +Notes +. – Two gatherings have been located for this species: the specimen collected by Bruguière and Olivier in +Iran +in Ventenat’s herbarium and the cultivated specimen from Cels’s garden in G-DC [G00450767]. A second collection in Ventenat’s herbarium has no information on its origin. The Bruguière and Olivier collection is here designated as the +lectotype +. A second collection at G [ +G00341494 +] is considered as a probable isolectotype but could also represent a Cels’s garden collection and should then be considered as a duplicate of the material in G-DC. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753EFF72FECDFD1BE7D1.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753EFF72FECDFD1BE7D1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2528b016aa5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753EFF72FECDFD1BE7D1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +17. + + +Cheiranthus longifolius +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +2: tab. 83. 1804. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +SPAIN +. +Canary Islands +, +Tenerife +]: + +Hort. Cels +, + +Ventenat +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341510 +]!; + + +isolecto-: G-DC [ +G00149563 +]!). + + + + + += + +Erysimum heritieri +Kuntze + + + + + +Notes +. – Specimens present in Ventenat’s herbarium clearly represent two gatherings. One of the collections came from Cels’s garden and the other is material brought back by Broussonet (G [ +G00341595 +], with a duplicate in G-DC [ +G00149716 +]). The gathering from Cels’s garden is a better specimen and is here designated as the +lectotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753FFCC2FA1DFD77E35E.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753FFCC2FA1DFD77E35E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3a116b5eef8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFE753FFCC2FA1DFD77E35E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +21. + + +Correa revoluta +Vent., Jard. Malmaison + +1: sub tab. 13. 1803. + + + + + += + +Correa reflexa +(Labill.) Vent. + + + + + + +Typus +: + +A USTRALIA +: + +sine loc., Neé s.n. +( +holo- +: +G +[ +G00439910 +]!; + +iso-: MA-305905!, MA-305906!). + + + + +Notes +. – The name + +Correa revoluta + +was validated with a short latin diagnosis ending in the note: “Specimen a Dom. Cavanilles datum”. The only collection we found at G bears a label in Cavanilles’s handwriting but provides no details on the collector. A visit at MA revealed that two duplicates exist in the general collection with Cavanilles’s handwriting: “Mazentoxerum reflexum? +Correa Smith +”, which is the same text as on the label in Ventenat’s herbarium. This collection is in fact from Luis Neé (1734-1803), who was one of the two botanists besides Thaddäus Haenke (1761-1817) who took part in the Malaspina Expedition (1789-1794) ( +Muñoz Garmendia, 2001 +) which aimed to establish a rational and coherent description of the possessions of the Spanish monarchy. The plants collected by Neé during this expedition served for the descriptions of new species by several botanists, among them Cavanilles and Candolle ( +Galera, 2016 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFF7521FCDBF948FE9DE4A6.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFF7521FCDBF948FE9DE4A6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..053516aa459 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFF7521FCDBF948FE9DE4A6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + +23. + + +Dianthus monadelphus +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 39. 1801. + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +[ +SYRIA +]: + +( +Ventenat +, Descr. Pl. Nouv.: tab. 39. 1801). + + + + + +Notes +. – No trustful collection of this species has been located. Among the undetermined specimen of + +Dianthus + +L. kept in P and originating from Asia, we found three collections gathered by Bruguière and Olivier [ +P04982230 +, +P04982231 +, +P04982239 +]. These collections may represent type material but we prefer to designate the plate tab. 39 as the +lectotype +until trustful type material can be assigned to this species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFF753FFF8BF9ABFA26E37F.xml b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFF753FFF8BF9ABFA26E37F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cb28a5592c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/19/37211951FFFF753FFF8BF9ABFA26E37F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@ + + + +Etienne-Pierre Ventenat (1757 - 1808) and the gardens of Cels and Empress Joséphine + + + +Author + +Callmander, Martin W. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Durbin, Olivier D. +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Lack, Hans-Walter +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Bungener, Patrick +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Martin, Pascal +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + + + +Author + +Gautier, Laurent +Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, C. P. 60, 1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. + +text + + +Candollea + + +2017 + +2017-03-30 + + +72 + + +1 + + +87 +132 + + + +journal article +20462 +10.15553/c2017v721a8 +acfdbf0a-a444-4a6d-a27f-2fbb27a6893b +2235-3658 +5721919 + + + + + +22. + + +Dalea purpurea +Vent., Descr. Pl. Nouv. + +: tab. 40. 1801. + + + + + + + + +Lectotypus + +(designated here): + +UNITED STATES +. +Illinois +: + + +Michaux +s.n. + +( +G +[ +G00341562 +]!; + + +isolecto-: +P +[ +P + +02141637 + +, +P + +02141638 + +]!, P-MICH [ +P00667210 +in part]!). + + + + + +Notes +. – In the Ventenat herbarium, +two specimens +have been found. One is clearly the one sent by Michaux from +Illinois +and the second is +a sterile +collection cultivated in Cels’s garden [G00341561]. We choose to designate as the +lectotype +the +Michaux s.n. +collection as it is fertile and better represents the morphology of + +Dalea purpurea +. + +Michaux collections determined as + +Petalostemon violaceus +Michx. + +and kept in P and P-MICH are considered as isolectotypes as they do represent the same collection that Ventenat received from +Illinois +which would be described by him as + +Dalea purpurea +. + +In P-MICH [P00667210] only the collections on the far left and far right are type material. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/27/3721274F1C02526A97079B8C1CC43495.xml b/data/37/21/27/3721274F1C02526A97079B8C1CC43495.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aa189636159 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/27/3721274F1C02526A97079B8C1CC43495.xml @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + +Freshwater fishes (Actinopterygii) of Kenyir Reservoir, Peninsular Malaysia: Updated checklist, taxonomic concerns and alien species + + + +Author + +Aqmal-Naser, Mohamad +Terrestrial Ecology, Biodiversity and Aquatic Research (TEBAR), Institute of Tropical Biodiversity and Sustainable Management, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Ali, Norsyafira Anis +Biodiversity and Ecology Research (BERes), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Azmi, Nur Ummiliani +Biodiversity and Ecology Research (BERes), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Fahmi-Ahmad, Muhammad +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7815-7054 +Biodiversity and Ecology Research (BERes), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Rizal, Syed Ahmad +Biodiversity and Ecology Research (BERes), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Ahmad, Amirrudin B. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-1289 +Biodiversity and Ecology Research (BERes), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia & Terrestrial Ecology, Biodiversity and Aquatic Research (TEBAR), Institute of Tropical Biodiversity and Sustainable Management, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia +amirrudin@umt.edu.my + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-07-03 + + +11 + + +100337 +100337 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e100337 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e100337 +1314-2828-11-e100337 +FC579DAD3A2557F890AD82360E5311D3 + + + + +Homalopteroides tweediei (Herre, 1940) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Event: +samplingProtocol: Literature; Amirrudin. A., Siti Azizah. M.N., Yusri. Y., Norainy. M.H., Mohd Asnizam. A., Ali. A.B. (2002) + + + + +Native status +Native species. + + +Conservation status +LC + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/5C/37215C5F0CA0EECC69F284CDB0447C71.xml b/data/37/21/5C/37215C5F0CA0EECC69F284CDB0447C71.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fe14025c9f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/5C/37215C5F0CA0EECC69F284CDB0447C71.xml @@ -0,0 +1,205 @@ + + + +Order Carnivora + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +532 +628 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Lutrogale perspicillata +(I. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire 1826) + + + + + + + +[Lutra] perspicillata +I. +Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire 1826 + +, + +in: Bory de +Saint-Vincent +, Dict. Class. Hist. Nat. Paris, Vol. 9: 519 + + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +" +Sumatra +" [ +Indonesia +]. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Smooth-coated Otter +. + + + + +Subspecies: +: + + +Subspecies + +Lutrogale perspicillata +subsp. +perspicillata +I. +Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire 1826 + + + +Subspecies + +Lutrogale perspicillata +subsp. +sindica +Pocock 1940 + + + + + +Distribution: +Afghanistan +, +Bangladesh +, +China +, +India +, +Indonesia +( +Sumatra +, +Java +, +Kalimantan +), +Iraq +, +Malaysia +, +Nepal +, +Pakistan +, +Thailand +, +Vietnam +. + + + + +Conservation: +CITES +– Appendix II; +IUCN +– Vulnerable. + + + + +Discussion: + +Pocock (1941 +a +) + +, +van Zyll de Jong (1972) +, and Davis (1978) placed + +perspicillata + +in the monotypic + +Lutrogale + +, considered a subgenus by + +Pohle (1920 +a +) + +; see comments under + +Lutra + +. + +Van +Zyll de Jong's (1987) + +analysis placed as sister groups + +L. maculicollis + +and + +L. lutra + ++ + +L. sumatrana + +. Synonyms allocated according to +Ellerman and Morrison-Scott (1951) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/84/372184C316189CDAC9C8B3E06FA75964.xml b/data/37/21/84/372184C316189CDAC9C8B3E06FA75964.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4e02c467dc9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/84/372184C316189CDAC9C8B3E06FA75964.xml @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@ + + + +Revision of the genus Draconarius Ovtchinnikov 1999 (Agelenidae: Coelotinae) in Yunnan, China, with an analysis of the Coelotinae diversity in the Gaoligongshan Mountains + + + +Author + +Wang, XIN-PING + + + +Author + +Griswold, CHARLES E. + + + +Author + +Miller, JEREMY A. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2010 + +2593 + + +1 +127 + + + + +http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2010/f/zt02593p127.pdf + +journal article +zt02593p127 + + + + + +Draconarius +longlingensis + +sp. nov. + + + +(Figs 288-295, 542) + + + + +Type material: +Holotype +. +♂ +, +CHINA +: +Yunnan +: +Tengchong County +: + +Bawan village, +39-41 km +of the road Bawan-Tengchong + +, +N 24° 55625' +, +E98° 45155' +, + +2416 m + +, + +October 12, 2003 + +, +G. Tang +( +HNU +, +CASENT9020372 +) + +. + + + +Paratypes +. +CHINA +: +Yunnan +: +Longling County +: +1♂ +, +Xiaoheishan village (National 320 Road) +, +N24° 50348' +, +E98° 45707' +, + +2106 m + +, + +October 29, 2003 + +; +G. Tang +( +HNU +, +CASENT9020400 +) + +. + +Tengchong County +: +1♂ +, + +Bawan village, +39-41 km +of the road Bawan-Tengchong + +, +N24° 55625' +, +E98° 45155' +, + +2416 m + +, + +October 12, 2003 + +, +G. Tang +( +CAS +, +CASENT9020373 +) + +. + + + + +Etymology: The specific name is derived from one of the +type +localities, Longling County, Yunnan, China; adjective. + + + + +Diagnosis: Males of this +new species +can be easily recognized by the long, broad patellar apophysis, the bifurcate conductor, the broad, round, simple median apophysis, and the prolaterally originating embolus (Figs 288-289). + + + + +Description: Male ( +holotype +). Medium sized +Coelotinae +, total length 9.01 (Fig. 293). Dorsal shield of prosoma 5.01 long, 3.36 wide; opisthosoma 4.00 long, 2.50 wide. +AME +smallest, ALE largest; PME and PLE subequal in size, slightly smaller than ALE ( +AME +0.14, +ALE +0.19, +PME +0.16, +PLE +0.17); +AME +separated from each other and from ALE by about half of +AME +diameter; PME separated from each other by +2 +/3 of their diameter, widely separated from PLE by about 1.5 times PME diameter (AME-AME 0.07, AME-ALE 0.08, PME-PME 0.10, PME-PLE 0.22, AME-PME 0.15) (Fig. 294). Labium longer than wide ( +L +/ +W +=1.11) (Fig. 295). Promargin of chelicera with 3 teeth, retromargin 2. Palpal patellar apophysis large, with broad base and slender distal end; RTA more than half of tibial length, with blunt distal end; lateral tibial apophysis distinctly separated from RTA; cymbial furrow less than half of cymbial length; conductor short, slightly bifurcate, with a dorsal apophysis and a small basal lamella; median apophysis broad, round, simple (not spoon-shaped); embolus short, filiform, prolateral in origin (Figs 288-292). + +Female. Unknown. + + +Distribution: China (Yunnan: Tengchong, Longling) (Fig. 542). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956032726AA1AB3C53C5E4FB66.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956032726AA1AB3C53C5E4FB66.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f130dd49d0f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956032726AA1AB3C53C5E4FB66.xml @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + +Lysiphlebus testaceipes +( +Cresson, 1880) + + + + + + +Figures 6, 7 + + + + +New records. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +La +Victo- ria, + +17.vi.2017 + +, +04°30′36″N +, +076°01′48″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +9 females +(MUSENUV: 28960 / GenBank accession number: +MF807198 +). Guacarí, + +04.iii.2017 + +, +03°45′01″N +, +076°19′30″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +6 males +(MUSENUV 28961) + +. + + + + +Identification. +Female: +1.5–1.6 mm +. Filiform antennae with 13–15 segments and 3–5 longitudinal placodes. Maxillary palpi 3-segmented and labial palpi 2-seg- mented. Petiole trapezoidal and smooth. Forewing vena- tion incomplete. Stigma widely triangular and distinctly longer than +R +1; r&Rs shorter than stigma and +R +1; M&mcu incomplete, just visible near r&Rs. Transversal vein between M&m-cu and r&Rs incomplete. + +Male: similar to female, but antennae with 14 or 15 segments. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956032726AA22E3FF0C5E4F887.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956032726AA22E3FF0C5E4F887.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..956a583b391 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956032726AA22E3FF0C5E4F887.xml @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + + +Aphidius colemani +Viereck, 1912 + + + + + + + +Figure 8 + + + + +New records. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Bolivar +, + +22.xi. 2016 + +, +04°17′60″N +, +076°12′29″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +124 females +(MUSENUV: 28962 / GenBank accession number: +MF 807199 +), +92 males +(MUSENUV 28963) + +. + + + + +Identification. +Female: +1.5–1.6 mm +. Filiform antennae with 15 or 16 segments and 0–2 longitudinal placodes. Maxillary palpi 4-segmented and labial palpi 2-seg- mented. Petiole trapezoidal with costate anterolateral area. Forewing venation incomplete, with +R +1 longer than stigma length; r&Rs same length than stigma but shorter than +R +1; M&m-cu complete, ending before r&Rs; transversal vein between M & m-cu and r&Rs incomplete. Stigma with elongate triangular shape. + +Male: similar to female but filiform antennae with 16 segments. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956032726BA22E3C50C785F9A2.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956032726BA22E3C50C785F9A2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ce7b75c1fbc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956032726BA22E3C50C785F9A2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + + +Aphidius funebris +Mackauer, 1961 + + + + + + + +Figure 9 + + + + +New record. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Roldanillo +, + +09.iv.2017 + +, +04°28′30″N +, +076°07′05″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +20 females + + + + +Figures 8–11. +Habitus of + +Aphidius + +. +8. + +A.colemani + +. +9. + +A.funebris + +. +10. + +A. matricariae + +. +11. + +A. platensis +. + +All are females. + + + +(MUSENUV: 28964 / GenBank accession number: +MF807200 +), +1 male +(MUSENUV 28965). + + + + +Identification. +Female: +2.1–2.2 mm +. Filiform antennae with 18 or 19 segments and 0–3 longitudinal placodes. Maxillary palpi 4-segmented and labial palpi 3-seg- mented. Petiole trapezoidal with finely costulate antero- lateral area. Forewing venation incomplete, with +R +1 with similar length than stigma; r&Rs same length than stigma and +R +1; M&m-cu complete, ending before r&Rs; transversal vein between M & m-cu and r&Rs almost complete. Stigma elongately triangular. + + +Male: +1.6–1.7 mm +. Similar to female but filiform antennae with 16–18 segments. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956033726BA1AB3D8CC279FA5F.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956033726BA1AB3D8CC279FA5F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d878daa9751 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956033726BA1AB3D8CC279FA5F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + + +Aphidius matricariae +Haliday, 1834 + + + + + + + +Figure 10 + + + + +New record. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Palmira +, + +05.v.2017 + +, +03°37′11″N +, +076°23′23″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +3 females +. (MUSENUV: 28966 (female) / GenBank accession num- ber: +MF807201 +) + +. + + + + +Identification. +Female: +1.8 mm +. Filiform antennae with 15 segments and 0–2 longitudinal placodes. Maxillary palpi 3- to 4-segmented and labial palpi 2-segmented. Petiole trapezoidal with costulate anterolateral area. Forewing venation incomplete, with +R +1 slightly longer than stigma length; r&Rs same length than stigma but shorter than +R +1; M&m-cu complete, ending before r&Rs; transversal vein between M & m-cu and r&Rs complete. Stigma elongately triangular. + +No males found. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956033726BA22E3E8AC267F7F0.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956033726BA22E3E8AC267F7F0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7d14fc0c4a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956033726BA22E3E8AC267F7F0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + + +Aphidius platensis +Br + + +è +thes, 1913 + + + + + +Figure 11 + + + + +New records. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Yotoco +, + +11.vii. 2017 + +, +03°49′31″N +, +076°23′49″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +13 females +(MUSENUV: 28967 / GenBank accession number: +MF 807202 +), +2 males +(MUSENUV 28968) + +. + + + + +Identification. +Female: +1.75–1.8 mm +. Filiform antennae with 14 or 15 segments and 0–2 longitudinal placodes. Maxillary palpi 4-segmented and labial palpi 2-segment- ed. Petiole almost parallel-sided with costate anterolater- al area. Forewing venation incomplete, with +R +1 approxi- mately 1/3 shorter than the stigma length; r&Rs same length than stigma but a bit longer than +R +1; M&m-cu complete, ending before r&Rs; transversal vein between M&m-cu and r&Rs incomplete. Stigma elongately triangular. + +Male: 2.0 mm. Similar to female but filiform anten- nae with 14 segments. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956034726CA1AB3D6FC4DBF7F3.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956034726CA1AB3D6FC4DBF7F3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7e6808575eb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956034726CA1AB3D6FC4DBF7F3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + + +Aphelinus paramali +Zehavi & Rosen, 1989 + + + + + + + +Figures 12–14. +Habitus of +Aphelinidae +. +12. + + +Aphelinus +varipes + +. + +13. + + +Aphelinus +paramali + +. + +14. + +Encarsia + +sp. + + + + +Figure 13 + + + + +New record. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Vijes +, + +22.iii. 2017 + +, +03°42′18″N +, +076°25′48″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +1 specimen +(MUSENUV: 28970 / GenBank accession number: +MF 807204 +) + +. + + + + +Identification. +0.75–0.95 mm +. Head and thorax black, abdomen black with only the first terguite dark yellow. Legs yellow, with dark coxae and hind tibia. Costal cell of forewings with only 1 row of hairs. Antennae dark yellow, with first and second funicular segments sub- quadrate, third funicular segment slightly longer than wide and club 1-segmented. Mouth parts black. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956034726CA1AB3F1AC7FCF9FE.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956034726CA1AB3F1AC7FCF9FE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7dbb05b9ada --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956034726CA1AB3F1AC7FCF9FE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + + +Aphelinus varipes +(Förster, 1841) + + + + + + + +Figure 12 + + + + +New records. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Zarzal +, + +07. viii.2017 + +, +04°25′02″N +, +076°03′44″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +3 specimens +(MUSENUV: 28969 / GenBank accession number: +MF 807203 +) + +. + + + + +Identification. +0.6–0.7 mm +. Head and thorax black, abdomen almost brown with the last 2 terguites darker. Legs yellow, with infuscate coxae, hind tibia and last tarsal segment. Costal cell of forewings with 2 or more complete row of hairs. Antennae light-yellow, with third funicular segment subquadrate and club 1-segmented. Mouth parts yellow. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956034726DA22E3DE5C2DCFD9E.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956034726DA22E3DE5C2DCFD9E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..25b03ab24a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956034726DA22E3DE5C2DCFD9E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,220 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + + +Encarsia + +sp. + + + + + + +Figure 14 + + + + +New record. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Vijes +, + +22.iii. 2017 + +, +03°42′18″N +, +076°25′48″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. +Marti- nez, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +1 specimen +(MUSENUV: 28971 / GenBank accession number: +MF 807205 +) + +. + + + + +Identification. +0.4–0.5 mm +. Body entirely yellow, with the first and the last abdominal segment darker. Anten- nae light yellow, with 3 funicular segments and a 3-segmented club. Legs light yellow, middle leg with 5 tarsal segments. Forewing hyaline, infuscated below mar- ginal vein and with an asetose area around stigmal vein. Mouth parts yellow. + + + + +Table 2. +Genetic distances between COI sequences of +Aphelinidae +. Conducted using the K2P model. Genetic distances in % are shown below the diagonal, SE in % above the diagonal. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ +Encarsia +sp. + + + + +Aphelinus +varipes + + + + +Aphelinus paramali + +
+ +Encarsia + +sp. +1.71.8
+ +Aphelinus varipes + +14.71.1
+ +Aphelinus paramali + +17.37.9
+ + + +Figures 15–17. +Habitus of hyperparasitoids. +15. + +Syrphophagus aphidivorus + +. +16. + +Pachyneuron aphidis + +17. + +Cerapteroceroides + +sp. + + + + + +Aphelinidae +molecular confirmation. + +Levels of interspecific variation between morphological identified spe- cies varied from 7.9 to 17.3% ( +Table 2 +), and we found intraspecific variation for + +Aphelinus varipes + +but none for + +Aphelinus paramali + +. Morphological identifications were congruent with molecular information, since the sequences, once blasted, recovered 99-100% similarity with the ones already present in +NCBI +. In the particular case of + +Encarsia + +sp. we could not found sequences with more than 89% of identity, morphological identification was more informative in this case. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956035726DA22E39F2C265FB71.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956035726DA22E39F2C265FB71.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c48263a9f03 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956035726DA22E39F2C265FB71.xml @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + + +Syrphophagus aphidivorus +(Mayr, 1876) + + + + + + + +Figure 15 + + + + +New records. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Dagua +, + +27. ii.2017 + +, +03°45′11″N +, +076°39′22″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +1 specimen +(MUSENUV 28973) + +. + + + + +Identification. +1.1–1.5 mm +. Body with a metallic green color. Mouth parts black. Antennae yellow, with 6 funic- ular segments and 3-segmented club. Forewing longer than body, with a very long submarginal vein, marginal vein enlarged but short and an enlarged stigmal vein. Stigma and post-marginal vein short. Second leg with long, thick tibial spur. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956035726DA22E3FF8C3F0F95D.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956035726DA22E3FF8C3F0F95D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cc827e60024 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956035726DA22E3FF8C3F0F95D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + + +Cerapteroceroides + +sp. + + + + + + +Figure 16 + + + + +New record. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Vijes +, + +22.iii.2017 + +, +03°42′18″N +, +076°25′48″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +1 specimen +(MUSENUV 28974) + +. + + + + +Identification. +0.5–0.6 mm +. Body entirely metallic blue. Mouth parts yellow. Antennae black and segments very close, giving the appearance like a single unit; scape the longest segment; funicular segments 6, very close to each other; club 3-segmented. Legs with coxa, femur and anterior part of tibia brownish. Wings typically infuscate. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956035726EA22E3DC8C488FC89.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956035726EA22E3DC8C488FC89.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..77ac30c2c53 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956035726EA22E3DC8C488FC89.xml @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + +Pachyneuron aphidis +( +Bouché, 1834) + + + + + + +Figure 17 + + + + +New records. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Palmira +, + +05. v.2017 + +, +03°37′11″N +, +076°23′23″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +3 specimens +. (MUSENUV 28972 / GenBank accession number +MF 807206 +) + +. + + + + +Identification. +0.8–1.5 mm +. Body entirely metallic blue. Mouth parts yellow. Antennae black, anulli 3, funicular + + + +Figures 18, 19. +Habitus of hyperparasitoids. +18. + +Alloxysta + +sp. +19. + +Aprostocetus + +sp. + + +segments 5, and club 3-segmented; all segments densely covered with sensilia. Forewing with a long submarginal vein; marginal vein enlarged but short; post marginal vein long; stigma enlarged. Foreleg with a curved tibial spur. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956036726EA1AB389BC688FABF.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956036726EA1AB389BC688FABF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..87099aee81f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956036726EA1AB389BC688FABF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + + +Alloxysta + +sp. + + + + + + +Figure 18 + + + + +New record. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Toro +, + +08. xi.2016 + +, +04°36′22″N +, +076°04′59″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +1 specimen +. (MUSENUV: 28975) + +. + + + + +Identification. +1.4–1.6 mm +. Body entirely dark brown. Mouth parts brown. Filiform antennae with 15 seg- ments. Mesoscutum rounded in dorsal view, with a few setae. Forewing as long as body, covered with pubes- cence. Radial cell trapezoidal and closed. Marginal setae absent. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/87/372187956036726EA1AB3EEDC79BF8B5.xml b/data/37/21/87/372187956036726EA1AB3EEDC79BF8B5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cfa5b2148c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/87/372187956036726EA1AB3EEDC79BF8B5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ + + + +New records of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) from Colombia + + + +Author + +Martínez-Chávez, Laura Marcela + + + +Author + +Duque-Gamboa, Diana Nataly + + + +Author + +Toro-Perea, Nelson + +text + + +Check List + + +2019 + +2019-12-06 + + +15 + + +6 + + +1083 +1091 + + + +journal article +10.15560/15.6.1083 +f23459ba-cdaa-4604-874c-beac8b3b3ee2 +1809-127X +3578350 + + + + + + + +Aprostocetus + +sp. + + + + + + +Figure 19 + + + + +New record. + +Colombia +, +Valle del Cauca +, +Vijes +, + +22.iii. 2017 + +, +03°42′18″N +, +076°25′48″W +, collected by hand, +L.M. Martinez +, +D.N. Duque +, +E. Aguirre +, +4 specimens +. (MUSENUV: 28976) + +. + + + + +Identification. +1.8–2.0 mm. Body entirely metallic green. Mouth parts yellow. Antennae dark yellow, with 3 anulli, 3 funicular segments, and a 3-segmented club. Forewing as long as body. Submarginal vein shorter than a very long marginal vein. Post marginal vein short. Stigma and stigmal vein thin. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/BF/3721BF64AC370C7A86F0384767DBD371.xml b/data/37/21/BF/3721BF64AC370C7A86F0384767DBD371.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f0090952daf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/BF/3721BF64AC370C7A86F0384767DBD371.xml @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Sciuridae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +754 +818 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + + +Prosciurillus leucomus +subsp. +tonkeanus +Meyer 1896 + + + + + +Synonyms: + +Prosciurillus leucomus +subsp. +elbertae +(Schwarz 1911) + +; + +Prosciurillus leucomus +subsp. +mowewensis +(Roux 1910) + +; + +Prosciurillus leucomus +subsp. +topapuensis +(Roux 1910) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/D0/3721D039DED3579FB84A005137D9E155.xml b/data/37/21/D0/3721D039DED3579FB84A005137D9E155.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..43a6f37b328 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/D0/3721D039DED3579FB84A005137D9E155.xml @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ + + + +Five new species of Synagelides Strand, 1906 from China (Araneae, Salticidae) + + + +Author + +Liu, Ke-ke +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7822-3667 +College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an 343009, Jiangxi, China & Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control in Red Soil Hilly Region of Jiangxi Province, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, 343009, Jiangxi, China +liukeke_1986@126.com + + + +Author + +Zhao, Zi-Yi +College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an 343009, Jiangxi, China + + + +Author + +Xiao, Yong-hong +College of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an 343009, Jiangxi, China & Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control in Red Soil Hilly Region of Jiangxi Province, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, 343009, Jiangxi, China + + + +Author + +Peng, Xian-Jin +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2614-3910 +College of Life Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, Hunan, China +xjpeng@126.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2022 + +2022-05-19 + + +1102 + + +59 +82 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1102.76800 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1102.76800 +1313-2970-1102-59 +BC653F50304F45599075EDF212EB8102 +8A3C4629EE9E52B8993AB681499741B5 + + + + +Synagelides jinding Liu +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 4 +, 5 + + + +Material examined. + + + +Holotype + +♂ +, +27°26'45.19"N +, +114°11'17.53"E +, + +1223 m + +, +Tupingao area +, near +Ropeway +, + + +Wugong +Mountain National Forest Park + + +, +Taishan Town +, +Anfu County +, + +Ji'an +City + +, +Jiangxi Province +, +China +, +4 May 2021 +, +K. Liu +, +Y. Ying +, +C. Xu +& +Q. Xiao +leg. + + + + +Etymology. +The name is taken from the famous Jinding Scenic Spot, which is very close to Tupingao area in the Wugong Mountain National Forest Park; noun in apposition. + + +Diagnosis. + +The male of this species is most similar to that of + +Synagelides annae + +Bohdanowicz, 1979 (see +Bohdanowicz 1979 +: 56, figs 14-17) in having a sharp ventral femoral apophysis, an anticlockwise spiral embolus, a C-shaped terminal apophysis with hook-shaped tip, and the mastoid tegular apophysis in retrolateral view, but differs from it in having (Figs +4C-H +, +5 +) the posterior cymbium with a long blunt retrolateral apophysis (vs absent), the parallel retrolateral tibial apophysis together with postero-retrolateral cymbial apophysis in retrolateral view (vs. convergent) and thick clavate retrolateral tibial apophysis (vs spine-like) with many scale-like serrations (vs absent). It also resembles those seven species + +S. birmanicus + +Bohdanowicz, 1987 (see +Bohdanowicz 1987 +: 84, figs 66-72), + +S. cavaleriei + +(Schenkel, 1963) (see +Bohdanowicz 1987 +: 66, figs 1, 2), + +S. gosainkundicus + +Bohdanowicz, 1987 (see +Bohdanowicz 1987 +: 78, figs 45, 46), + +S. kosi + +Logunov & Hereward, 2006 (see +Logunov and Hereward 2006 +: 285, figs 21, 22), + +S. martensi + +Bohdanowicz, 1987 (see +Logunov and Hereward 2006 +: 287, figs 37-40), + +S. oleksiaki + +Bohdanowicz, 1987 (see +Bohdanowicz 1987 +: 79, figs 47, 48), and + +S. walesai + +Bohdanowicz, 1987 (see +Bohdanowicz 1987 +: 72, figs 23, 24), but it can be easily distinguished from them by the parallel retrolateral tibial apophysis together with postero-retrolateral cymbial apophysis (vs convergent). + + + +Figure 4. + +Synagelides jinding + +sp. nov., holotype male +A +habitus, dorsal view +B +same, ventral view +C +palp, prolateral view +D +same, ventral view +E +same, retrolateral view +F +same, detail of ventral femoral apophysis, retrolateral view +G +same, retrolateral view, slightly dorsal +H +same, dorsal view. Abbreviations: DTA - dorso-prolateral tibial apophysis, Em - embolus, PCA - postero-prolateral cymbial apophysis, RCA - postero-retrolateral cymbial apophysis, RTA - retrolateral tibial apophysis, SD - sperm duct, SS - scale-like serrations, TA - terminal apophysis, VFA - ventral femoral apophysis. Scale bars: 0.2 mm ( +A, B +); 0.05 mm ( +C-E, G, H +); 0.1 mm ( +F +). + + + + +Figure 5. + +Synagelides jinding + +sp. nov., SEMs of holotype male +A +palp, ventral view +B +same, detail of terminal apophysis and embolus, ventral view +C +same, retrolateral view +D +same, detail of retrolateral tibial apophysis, retrolateral view +E +same, detail of terminal apophysis and embolus, retrolateral view +F +same, dorsal view, slightly prolateral +G +same, detail of postero-prolateral cymbial apophysis, postero-retrolateral cymbial apophysis and dorso-prolateral tibial apophysis, dorsal view. Abbreviations: DTA - dorso-prolateral tibial apophysis, Em - embolus, PCA - postero-prolateral cymbial apophysis, RCA - postero-retrolateral cymbial apophysis, RTA - retrolateral tibial apophysis, SS - scale-like serrations, TA - terminal apophysis. + + + + +Description. + +Habitus +as in Fig. +4A, B +. Total length 2.97. Carapace 1.50 long, 1.09 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.30; ALE 0.18; PME 0.08; PLE 0.17; AME-AME 0.07; AME-ALE 0.04; PME-PME 0.77; ALE-ALE 0.73; PME-PLE 0.30; PLE-PLE 0.95; ALE-PLE 0.75; AME-PME 0.38; AME-PLE 0.63. MOA: 0.64 long; 0.67 anterior width, 0.91 posterior width. Fovea (Fig. +4A +) round, hollowed. Chelicerae (Fig. +4B +) with two promarginal teeth (proximal larger) and one large laminar retromarginal teeth. Sternum (Fig. +4B +) shield-shaped, longer than wide, posterior end arch-shaped, smooth. Leg measurements: I 3.36 (1.07, 0.71, 0.9, 0.36, 0.32); II 2.2 (0.67, 0.32, 0.46, 0.47, 0.28); III 2.33 (0.69, 0.28, 0.5, 0.55, 0.31); IV 2.25 (0.65, 0.28, 0.52, 0.55, 0.25). Femur width: I 0.31; II 0.21; III 0.21; IV 0.18. Leg spination (Fig. +4A, B +): I tipv 1-2-1, rv 1-2-1; Met pv 0-1-1, rv 0-1-1. Pedicel 0.09. Abdomen 1.37 long, 0.83 wide. + + +Coloration +(Fig. +4A, B +). Carapace yellow-brown, anterior part darker than posterior, posteriorly with radial grooves and 12-14 rows of short black setae. Endites yellowish, mottled. Labium yellowish brown, anteriorly with a single row of strong setae, posteriorly mottled. Sternum, yellow, with pale brown mottled spots around margin. Legs: trochanters I-IV yellow, with dark brown stripe; femur I dark yellow-brown, femora II-IV yellow, with prolateral dark brown stripes; patellae, tibiae, and metatarsi yellow, with dark brown lateral stripes; tarsi yellowish, proximal part darker than distal. Abdomen yellowish to dark brown, with three pairs of yellowish stripes in anterior part and one arch-shaped, yellowish stripe on subposterior part; venter yellowish to yellow. Spinnerets yellowish brown, mottled. + + +Palp +(Figs +4C-H +, +5 +). Femur with a strongly sharp, tooth-like ventral apophysis. Patella swollen, with a length-width ratio of ca 1.58. Tibia small and narrow, with a long strong clavate retrolateral apophysis which presents many little scale-like serrations on anterior surface and nearly longer than 1/2 length of cymbium, and a dorsal apophysis locking cymbial postero-prolateral apophysis. Cymbium bullet-shaped in dorsal view, with a long, strong, blunt, sclerotized postero-retrolateral and a long, strong, triangular, postero-prolateral apophysis. Tegulum broad, C-shaped extended in ventral view, with a clear mastoid apophysis and a thin sperm duct in retrolateral view. Terminal apophysis arising from antero-retrolateral part of tegulum, strongly sclerotized, Y-shaped in retrolateral view, with abundant little scale-like serrations on antero-retrolateral surface. Embolus with an anticlockwise spiral in ventral view, longer than terminal apophysis, with broad convoluted basal part and whip-shaped apical part. + + +Female. +Unknown. + + + +Comments. + +The male of this species is not conspecific with the female of + +Synagelides triangulatus + +sp. nov. for the following reasons. Firstly, the male abdomen has the two pairs of white stripes medially (vs a pair of spots and one chevron-shaped yellowish stripe in + +S. triangulatus + +) and the arch-shaped yellowish stripe located subposteriorly (vs absent in + +S. triangulatus + +). + + + +Distribution. + +Known only from the type locality in Jiangxi Province, China (Fig. +13 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/21/D7/3721D74239F45FAF97B7DCA23DA95147.xml b/data/37/21/D7/3721D74239F45FAF97B7DCA23DA95147.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..66da24cbad6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/21/D7/3721D74239F45FAF97B7DCA23DA95147.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Parus major +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + + +P. capite nigro, temporibus albis, nucha lutea. +Fn. svec. +238. + + +Parus major. +Gesn. av. +640. +Bell. av. +95. +a. Aldr. +orn. l. 17. +c. +13. +Will. orn. +174. +Raj. av. +73. +n. +3. +Alb. av. +1. +p. +44. +t. +46. +Frisch. av. +3. +t. +13. +f. +1. 2. +Olin. av. +28. + + + + +Habitat in +Europa. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/22/47/3722471EBA077632BBC3A6EE2911A37F.xml b/data/37/22/47/3722471EBA077632BBC3A6EE2911A37F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..952beab7c65 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/22/47/3722471EBA077632BBC3A6EE2911A37F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Fabaceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +37 +400 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Medicago sativa +L. + + + + + +Artbeschreibung: +30-90 cm +hoch, aufrecht. +Blaetter +3 +zaehlig +, +Teilblaetter +bis +3 cm +lang, vorn meist gerundet oder gestutzt, spitz +gezaehnt +. + +Blueten +heller oder dunkler blau bis violett + +, in +endstaendigen +, 5-25 +bluetigen +, dicht +gedraengten +Trauben. +Frucht mit 1,5-3 Schraubenwindungen +, Durchmesser +4-6 mm +. + + + + +Bluetezeit +: 6-8 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz: Wiesen, als Futterpflanze +angesaet +und verwildert / kollin-montan(-subalpin) / CH + + + + +Verbreitung global: +Urspruenglich +wahrscheinlich ostmediterran, heute weltweit verbreitet + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F +maessig +trocken +Lichtzahl LhellSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rneutral bis basisch (pH 5.5-8.5)Temperaturzahl T +kollin ( +Laubmischwaelder +mit Eichen) +
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +maessig +naehrstoffarm +bis +maessig +naehrstoffreich + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subkontinental (niedrige relative Luftfeuchtigkeit, grosse Temperaturschwankungen, eher kalte Winter)
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Saat-Luzerne +Nom +francais +: + +Luzerne +cultivee + +Nome italiano: +Erba medica + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/22/A4/3722A46D39965BEDA1431B34EFCF2C4D.xml b/data/37/22/A4/3722A46D39965BEDA1431B34EFCF2C4D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fc5191c4285 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/22/A4/3722A46D39965BEDA1431B34EFCF2C4D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +The outstanding suction-feeder Marcopoloichthys furreri new species (Actinopterygii) from the Middle Triassic Tethys Realm of Europe and its implications for early evolution of neopterygian fishes + + + +Author + +Arratia, Gloria +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7363-1319 +Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Dyche Hall, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA +garratia@ku.edu + +text + + +Fossil Record + + +2022 + +2022-07-05 + + +25 + + +2 + + +231 +261 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.85621 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.85621 +2193-0074-2-231 +48170AC29C0B42AF9CCD3C770113F4CE +A551F2E5D1B25823A82E6821182CF3E6 + + + + +Family +Marcopoloichthyidae Tintori et al., 2007 + + + +Emended diagnosis. +The family diagnosis is based on a unique combination of characters (uniquely derived features among teleosteomorphs are identified with an asterisk [*]): Small fishes about 55 mm maximum length, with naked body, and highly modified protractile upper and lower jaws giving the anterior part of the head a characteristic profile [*]. The body shape is torpedo-like, with a head about 50% deeper than the caudal peduncle [*]. T-shaped mesethmoid with strong lateral processes. Two pairs of nasal bones [*]. Absence of supramaxillae [*]. Absence of dentition [*]. Preopercle L-shaped. Interopercle small triangle-like. Vertebral column with persistent notochord in older forms; chordacentral vertebral column in younger. Vertebral caudal region diplospondylous, with small interdorsal and interventral elements. Ossified ribs absent. Short, stout epineural processes associated to the abdominal neural arches. Large and curved pelvic plates. First dorsal fin proximal radial enlarged and plate-like, resulting from fusion of three or more radials and supporting four or more dorsal rays [*]. Enlarged last dorsal proximal radial supporting several dorsal rays [*]. First anal fin proximal radial basally expanded and very elongate and dorso-anteriorly bent, acting as post-coelomic bone [*]. Last anal fin proximal radial highly modified, expanded, and plate-like, supporting three or more lepidothrichia [*]. No fringing fulcra associated with paired, dorsal, or anal fins. Homocercal caudal fin with both lobes deeply forked. Body lobe of the caudal fin completely reduced. Ural region with five or six broad and short hypurals. Diastema hypural absent or very narrow. Caudal fin with dorsal and ventral scutes; well-developed epaxial and hypaxial basal fulcra; short series of epaxial and hypaxial fringing fulcra reaching about half length of first and last principal rays. Accessory fulcra present in hypaxial caudal lobe. Procurrent rays only present in the hypaxial lobe of caudal fin. Eighteen to 21 principal caudal rays. A few large scales around urogenital opening [*]. + + +Content. + +One genus and four species known, + +Marcopoloichthys ani + +, + +M. andreetti + +, + +M. faccii + +, and + +M. furreri + +sp. nov. + + + +Geographic distribution. + +Eurasian distribution, including Southern China (Yunnan and Guizhou Provinces), Northern Italy (Lombardy and Friuli), and eastern Switzerland (Canton +Graubuenden +). Another undescribed species is present in the Middle Triassic of southern Switzerland, in Monte San Giorgio, Canton Ticino; T. +Buergin +, pers. comm., 2022. + + + +Age. +From Anisian (Middle Triassic) to Norian (Late Triassic). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/22/CF/3722CFAF0A79ED3EC0BBC2675F860587.xml b/data/37/22/CF/3722CFAF0A79ED3EC0BBC2675F860587.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5926f397f44 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/22/CF/3722CFAF0A79ED3EC0BBC2675F860587.xml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +bousquety1@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-11-28 + + +245 + + +1 +1722 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 +1313-2970-245-1 +FFFF52503A0AFF882450FFB66D45FF8E +578462 + + + + +Scaphinotus subtilis (Schaum, 1863) + + + + +Cychrus subtilis +Schaum, 1863: 72. Type locality: "Sacramento [Sacramento County, California]" (original citation). Syntype(s) in ZMHB. + + + +Distribution. +This species is known only from central California, mostly along the west side of the Sierra Nevada from Calaveras County to Tulare and Kern Counties [see Gidaspow 1968: Fig. 8]. + + +Records. + +USA +: CA + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/23/05/372305B4421AFE6F02A4D6EB4C0DBDAF.xml b/data/37/23/05/372305B4421AFE6F02A4D6EB4C0DBDAF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3597652431b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/23/05/372305B4421AFE6F02A4D6EB4C0DBDAF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,194 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Asteraceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +1074 +1250 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Cirsium spinosissimum +(L.) Scop. + + + + + +Artbeschreibung: +20-50 cm +hoch, abstehend bis zottig behaart, +Staengel +einfach oder wenig verzweigt. + +Blaetter +steif, stechend, bis +ueber +die Mitte buchtig-fiederteilig + +, mit 3-5teiligen, stachelig +gezaehnten +Abschnitten. + +Blueten +blassgelb. +Koepfe +in dichten, +endstaendigen +Knaeueln +, diese von gelblichen, steifen, fiederteiligen, stachelig +gezaehnten +Hochblaettern +umgeben + +. +Huellen +2-2,5 cm +lang. +Fruechte +ca. +4 mm +, Pappus ca. +1,5 cm +lang. + + + + +Bluetezeit +: 7-8 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz: Weiden, +Laegerstellen +, Gesteinsschutt / subalpin-alpin / A, M in +Alpennaehe + + + +Verbreitung global: Alpin + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F +feucht; Feuchtigkeit +maessig +wechselnd ( ++/- +1-2 Stufen) +Lichtzahl LhellSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rschwach sauer bis neutral (pH 4.5-7.5)Temperaturzahl T +unter-alpin, supra-subalpin und ober-subalpin ( +Arven-Laerchenwaelder +) +
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +naehrstoffreich + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K + +subozeanisch bis subkontinental (mittlere Luftfeuchtigkeit, +maessige +Temperaturschwankungen und +maessig +tiefe Wintertemperaturen) +
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Alpen-Kratzdistel +, +Reichstachelige Kratzdistel +Nom +francais +: + +Cirse +epineux + +Nome italiano: +Cardo spinosissimo + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/23/80/37238004BC55F98045B61F331C111B88.xml b/data/37/23/80/37238004BC55F98045B61F331C111B88.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74756c063a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/23/80/37238004BC55F98045B61F331C111B88.xml @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Subfamily +Thilmaninae Kazantsev, 2004 + + + + +Thilmaninae +Kazantsev, 2004b: 240 [stem: Thilman-]. Type genus: +Thilmanus +Baudi di Selve, 1871. Comment: transferred from +Lycidae +by +Bocak +and Brlik (2008). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/23/A1/3723A1DB4762866D09D2F9DC83D870BE.xml b/data/37/23/A1/3723A1DB4762866D09D2F9DC83D870BE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1f941616797 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/23/A1/3723A1DB4762866D09D2F9DC83D870BE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ + + + +Order Carnivora + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +532 +628 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Mustela altaica +Pallas 1811 + + + + + + + +Mustela altaica +Pallas 1811 + +, +Zoographia Rosso-Asiatica, Part I: 98 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +"qui alpes altaicas adibunt" [ +Altai +Mtns]. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Mountain Weasel +. + + + + +Subspecies: +: + + +Subspecies + +Mustela altaica +subsp. +altaica +Pallas 1811 + + + +Subspecies + +Mustela altaica +subsp. +birulai +Ognev 1928 + + + +Subspecies + +Mustela altaica +subsp. +raddei +Ognev 1928 + + + +Subspecies + +Mustela altaica +subsp. +temon +Hodgson 1857 + + + + + +Distribution: +W and N +China +, Kashmir, E +Kazakhstan +, +Kyrgyzstan +, +Mongolia +, +North Korea +(?), +Russia +(S and SE Siberia, +Primorski Krai +), Sikkim, +Tajikistan +. + + + + +Conservation: +CITES +– Appendix III ( +India +); +IUCN +– Lower Risk (lc). + + + + +Discussion: +Youngman (1982) +placed + +altaica + +in the subgenus + +Mustela + +; however, +Ognev (1935) +considered + +sibirica + +and + +altaica + +closely related. Abramov (1999) placed it in the subgenus + +Gale + +. Synonyms allocated according to +Ellerman and Morrison-Scott (1951) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/23/F8/3723F825A3AFF17D1D30B1F1FD4BE9EC.xml b/data/37/23/F8/3723F825A3AFF17D1D30B1F1FD4BE9EC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3c57abdef97 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/23/F8/3723F825A3AFF17D1D30B1F1FD4BE9EC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +Targeting a portion of central European spider diversity for permanent preservation + + + +Author + +Candek, Klemen + + + +Author + +Gregoric, Matjaz + + + +Author + +Kostanjsek, Rok + + + +Author + +Frick, Holger + + + +Author + +Kropf, Christian + + + +Author + +Kuntner, Matjaz + + + +Author + +Miller, Jeremy A. + + + +Author + +Hoeksema, Bert W. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2013 + +1 + + +980 +980 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e980 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e980 +1314-2828-1 + + + + +aurocinctus +Sibianor +Salticidae +Animalia + + + + +Sibianor aurocinctus (Ohlert, 1865) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +Occurrence: recordedBy: + +Kuntner, +Gregoric +, +Candek + +; sex: +3 males +; Location: locationID: CH12; country: +Switzerland +; locality: +Bernese Alps, Nessental +; minimumElevationInMeters: 930; maximumElevationInMeters: 930; decimalLatitude: +46.7213 +; decimalLongitude: +8.3039 +; Event: eventDate: +2011-07-10 +; habitat: grassland and loan trees + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/24/47/37244754FF98FFA64A0EFEFAFCDBFE5C.xml b/data/37/24/47/37244754FF98FFA64A0EFEFAFCDBFE5C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4542e41cabd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/24/47/37244754FF98FFA64A0EFEFAFCDBFE5C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,205 @@ + + + +Redescription of Chone infundibuliformis Krøyer, 1856 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae) and histology of the branchial crown appendages, collar and glandular ridge + + + +Author + +Tovar-Hernández, María Ana + + + +Author + +Sosa-Rodríguez, Teresa + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2006 + +1115 + + +31 +59 + + + +journal article +50800 +10.5281/zenodo.171592 +8a6d70f4-4583-4d51-875c-6c7edf902aea +1175­5326 +171592 + + + + + + + +Chone +Krøyer, 1856 +Restricted + + + + + + + + +Chone +Krøyer, 1856 + +, p. 13.— +Sars, 1862 +, p. 119.— +Malmgren, 1866 +, p. 404.— +Langerhans, 1881 +, p. 111.— +Hofsommer, 1913 +, p. 332.— +McIntosh, 1923 +, p. 287.— +Fauvel, 1927 +, p. 334.— +Day, 1967 +, p. 776.— +Banse, 1972 +, p 460.— +Fitzhugh, 1989 +, p. 67.— +Giangrande, 1992 +, p. 518. + + + +Parachonia +Kinberg, 1867 + +, p. 355. + + + +Dialychone +Claparède, 1870 + +, p.170. + + + +Megachone +Johnson, 1901 + +, p. 430. + + + +Metachone +Bush + +in Moore, 1904, p. 190. + + + + + +Type +species + +: + +Chone infundibuliformis +Krøyer, 1856 + +. + + +Definition +: Branchial lobes fused dorsally. Radiolar skeleton with two rows of cells. Palmate membrane and radiolar flanges present. Dorsal lips broadly rounded, as long as wide, without mid­rib; vascularized by plexus of small blood vessels derived from basal branchial blood vessels; dorsal lips with hyaline cartilage, but without branchial skeleton extensions. Ventral lips present, broadly rounded. Dorsal and ventral pinnular appendages present. Anterior margin of anterior peristomial ring with narrow ventral lobe. Posterior peristomial ring collar present. Glandular ridge on chaetiger 2. Ventral shields absent. Notopodia in chaetiger 1 with two groups of elongate, narrowly hooded chaetae in Cshaped arrangement. Notopodia in chaetigers 2–8 with superior group of chaetae in two irregular rows, all elongate, narrowly hooded; inferior group with one anterior row of short bayonet chaetae, two posterior rows with symmetrical, mucronate (or with very fine hairs instead) paleate chaetae. Thoracic neuropodia bearing acicular uncini with teeth above main fang unequal in size, median tooth of basal row enlarged, hood present, handles long. Anterior abdominal segments with two transverse rows of elongate, narrowly hooded chaetae, chaetae from the anterior row shorter than chaetae in posterior row; uncini with well developed rectangular breast, handles absent, main fang well developed, few rows of small teeth covering one half (or less) of the main fang length; intrafascicular variation: older uncini, located dorsalmost in torus, smallest in size, younger uncini, located ventralmost in torus, biggest in size. Posterior abdominal segments with very elongate, narrowly hooded chaetae; uncini shape and intrafascicular variation similar to those in anterior abdominal segments. + + + + +Remarks: +The following genera have been placed into synonymy with + +Chone + +: + +Parachonia + +, by Johansson (1927); + +Megachone + +, by +Banse (1972) +; + +Metachone + +, by +Fauvel (1927) +; + +Dialychone + +, by +Fitzhugh (1989) +. + +Parachonia letterstedti +Kinberg, 1867 + +[SMNH 576, +holotype +], + +Megachone aurantiaca +Johnson, 1901 + +[MCZ 1933, +holotype +], and + +Metachone mollis +Bush + +in Moore, 1904 [YPM 2793, +holotype +] agree in every respect with the above definition of the genus. + +Dialychone + +was synonymized with + +Chone + +by +Fitzhugh (1989) +because of the presence or absence of the palmate membrane is a character used to distinguish species rather than genera. Although no +type +material is available for this species, Knight­Jones et al. (1991), +Giangrande (1992) +, and +Fitzhugh (1989) +reviewed topotype material of + +Dialychone acustica +Claparède, 1870 + +, indicating a low web extends for about a quarter of the branchial crown length. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/24/47/37244754FF9BFFB54A0EFE6FFB7BFE84.xml b/data/37/24/47/37244754FF9BFFB54A0EFE6FFB7BFE84.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4c9b671af3a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/24/47/37244754FF9BFFB54A0EFE6FFB7BFE84.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1308 @@ + + + +Redescription of Chone infundibuliformis Krøyer, 1856 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae) and histology of the branchial crown appendages, collar and glandular ridge + + + +Author + +Tovar-Hernández, María Ana + + + +Author + +Sosa-Rodríguez, Teresa + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2006 + +1115 + + +31 +59 + + + +journal article +50800 +10.5281/zenodo.171592 +8a6d70f4-4583-4d51-875c-6c7edf902aea +1175­5326 +171592 + + + + + + + +Chone infundibuliformis +Krøyer, 1856 + + + + + +Figures 1–3 +, +4 +A–C, 5–11 + + + + + + +Chone infundibuliformis +Krøyer, 1856 + +, 33.— + +Malmgren, 1866 +: 404 + +—405, Pl. 28, Fig. 87.— + +Malmgren, 1867 +: 116 + +.— + +Cunningham and Ramage, 1887 +: 670 + +, Pl. 44, Fig. 32.— + +McIntosh, 1916 +: 35 + +, Pl. 2, +Fig. 9 +.— + +Fauvel, 1927 +: 334 + +, Fig. 116a–o.— +Wesenberg­Lund, 1950 +, 58.— + +Banse, 1972 +: 461 + +–465, +Fig. 1 +a–l.— + +Hartmann­Schröder, 1996 +: 550 + +, Fig. 168a–h. + + + + + + +Type +material + +: +Lectotype +[ +ZMUC +POL +–1749] +Greenland +, locality unknown, Leg. Krøyer. +Paralectotypes +[ +USNM +376] +Greenland +, locality unknown, Leg. Krøyer, not Lutken (2). +Paralectotypes +[ +BMNH +82.5.12.33] +Greenland +, locality unknown, Leg. Krøyer, not Lutken (3). + + +Non­type material +: + +Greenland + +[ +BMNH +] 1921.5.1.4364, 4368/69 +Greenland +, Godhaven Harbour, “Valorous”, +9–18 m +(5). 1921.5.1.4364, 4368/69 +Greenland +, Bressay Sound, Coll. Mc Intosh, 1921, 5, 1–436K (2). No number, Press. J. Berryman, Coll. Yell, +Shetland +, Whaal Firth in silt, 1979/80 (3). [ +LACM +– +AHF +] 0 0 3224 Goodhvan Fjord, dredged, Kristineberg Zool. Station (4). [ +MCZ +] North Atlantic Ocean, R/V Albatross IV, Cruise 9809, Sta. 187, +July 29, 1998 +, +NMFS +1999 (1). [ +SMNH +] 6861, 73073 W +Greenland +, Egedesminde, Leg. O. Torell (1). 6862, 73074 W +Greenland +, Godhavn, +55 m +, +69° 14’ N +, Leg. C. T. Amondsen (2). [ +ZMB +] 3106 +Grönland +, Karajak, Fjord. Leg. Vanhöffem S, July, 1893 (4); +July 21, 1893 +(1). 5167 +Grönland +, Coll. Grube/Oersted S. (3). 5168 Spitzbergen, Coll. Grube/Malmgren S. (1). [ +ZMUC +] +POL +–1761 Lille Hellefiskebanke, +4 miles +W. S. W. of Rifkol, +July 10, 1912 +, +40 m +, Coll. Bornemann (1). +POL +–1764 East of +Greenland +, 4th +Thule +Expedition Sta. 26, Kangerolussuaq, +August 20, 1933 +, +1–5 m +(2). +POL +–1765 East of +Greenland +, 4th +Thule +Expedition Sta. 29, Kangerolussuaq, +August 25, 1933 +, +4–5 m +(28). + +Norway + +[ +SMNH +] 6864, 73076 +Svalbard +, Vest Spitzbergen, Hornsund, +73 m +, Leg. Swedish Arctic Expedition, 1864 (2). [ +ZMB +] 1986 Spitzbergen, Kükenthal S. G. (2). [ +ZMB +] 6226 Spitzbergen, Exp. Rómer & Schaudinn S. Sta. 12 (1); Sta. 13 (3); Sta 14 (1); Sta. 36 (3); Sta. 41 (2); Sta 513 (2). + +Canada + +[ +CMN +] 3867 Byam Martin Channel, Sta. 10, +75 +° 01.4’ N, +106° 35’ W +, R. K. S. Lee, +July 14, 1974 +(2). 3870 Byam Martin Channel, +74° 58.8’ N +, +106° 23.5’ W +, Sta. 2, Coll. R. K. S. Lee, +June 18, 1974 +(1). 1980–0171 New Foundland, Labrador Nain, +56° 36’ N +, 62° N, Sta. SAR3–528B, Coll. J. Barrie, +September 11, 1977 +(1). 1982–0938 North West Territories, Davis Strait, +61° 10’ N +, 61° W, Coll. Mac Laren Atlantic, +October 23, 1976 +, Sta. 25 (3). 1988–0364 New Foundland, Labrador Shelf, Sta. 4, +53 +° 19’ N, +54° 41’ W +, +350 m +, Coll. D. Peer, Habitat Ecol Lab, +September 5–6, 1987 +(1). 1993–0030 Sta. B–2, Coll. Arctic Biol. Sta. Ste. Anne de Bellevue, 1949–00–00 (1). 1993­0031 Sta. 67–5. Coll. Arctic Biol. Sta. Ste. Anne de Bellevue, 1967–00–00 (3). 1993–0032 Frobisher Bay, Baffin, Sta. 5b, +63° 43.5’ N +, +68° 31.7’ W +, +13–23 m +, Coll. Arctic Biol. Sta. Ste. Anne de Bellevue (2). 1995–0570 Sta. Theron, Th–451–45, Coll. Arctic Biol. Sta. Ste. Anne de Bellevue, September 0 1, 1965 (3). 1995–0571 Sta. Theron, Th–490 VVG–49, Coll. Arctic Biol. Sta. Ste. Anne de Bellevue, +September 8, 1965 +(5). +NFLD +Sta. 517, +51 +° 22’ N, +50° 21’31’’ W +. Coll. S. W. Gorham, + +May 28, +1963 + +, 360 m, Set. 134 (2). “Calanus” 1949 B–11 (1). + + +Additional material +: + +Chone americana +Day, 1973 + +[ +FSBC +EJ71414] Eastern Florida, St. Lucie County, Hutchinson Island, East of F. P. and L. Electrical generating plant, +27° 21’ 23’’ N +, +80° 13’ 24’’ W +, 11.2 m. + +Chone aurantiaca +( +Johnson, 1901 +) + +, +holotype +[ +MCZ +1933] Port Orchard, Puget Sound, Washington, Coll. A. Robertson, +July 4, 1898 +. [ +LACM +– +AHF +] West Seattle, Washington, Vashon Island, Ferry dock, +May 7, 2004 +, intertidal, Coll. B. Pernet. + +Chone farringtonae +Tovar­Hernández, 2005 + +, +paratype +[ +FSBC +I 66734] West Coast of Florida, off shore Pinellas County, Boca Ciega Bay, +June 17, 1976 +. + +Chone georgesi +Fitzhugh + +in press [ECOSUR] +Isla +Mujeres, Bajo Pepito, +Mexico +, in + +Stypopodium zonata +, Coll. M. Díaz + +, +February 1997 +. + +Chone gracilis +Moore, 1906 + +, +holotype +[ +USNM +5513] Alitak Bay, Kodiak Island, Alaska, Sta. 4274 (1903), 7.2– + +42 m +. + + +Chone magna +( +Moore, 1923 +) + +, +holotype +[ +USNM +17281] Off Harris, Pt. San Miguel, California, Albatross R/V, Sta. 4436, +April 15, 1904 +. + +Chone mollis +( +Bush, 1904 +) + +, +holotype +[ +YPM +2793] Harriman Alaska Expedition, Pacific Grove, California, Coll. W. R. Coe, 1901. + +Chone picta +Verrill, 1885 + +, topotype [ +YPM +30002] Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts. +70° 51’ N +, +41° 22’ W +. Coll. J. L. Simon and P. E. Schwamb, +June 22, 1966 +. + +Chone princei +McIntosh, 1916 + +, topotype [ +CMN +1989–0394] Quebec, St. Lawrence estuary, off Point Mitis, +37 m +, Sta. B610–7 +IL +–152D, Coll. Rafat MASSAD, July 0 9, 1971. + + +Redescription + + +The following redescription is based mainly upon the +lectotype +. Numbers in parentheses correspond to variation among +paralectotypes +and additional material. + + +Colour, body shape and size +: Body cream colored (specimen from North Atlantic Ocean pink when collected, +MCZ +, R/V Albatross IV), trunk cylindrical ( +Fig. 1 +). Body length: +81 mm +(12–103), width: +8 mm +(1–10). Tubes composed of fine sand. + + + + +Branchial lobes and branchial crown +: Branchial lobes medium­sized, located in lateral position on either side of mouth, curved such that they are concave in cross section relative to the mouth, insertion not exposed beyond collar ( +Figs 1 +A–B). Branchial crown length: +19 mm +(11–90). Radioles: 24 (7–23) pairs. Each radiole with paired series of pinnules of different size; median pinnules 3 times longer than more proximal pinnules. Radiolar tips: short­sized ( +Fig. 2 +B). The palmate membrane extends up three quarters of the branchial crown length. Lateral flanges broad ( +Figs 2 +A–B), outer radiole surfaces flat ( +Fig. 2 +A). Dorsal lips extend from the inner, dorsal margins of the branchial lobes and terminate just dorsal to mouth ( +Fig. 5 +A), broadly rounded in frontal view, as long as wide, without mid­rib, resembling the ventral lips ( + +Fig. +1 + +I), longer than wide in dorso­lateral view ( +Figs 1 +E–F, H); dorsal lips vascularized by a plexus of small blood vessels derived from basal branchial blood vessels ( +Fig. 6 +A–B); filled with hyaline cartilage ( +Figs 7 +A–C, E), no extension of branchial skeleton. Dorsal margin of dorsal lips extends up along inner margin of dorsalmost radiole, fused with 8 ( +5–9–10 +) dorsal pinnular appendages united by a palmate membrane ( +Fig. 1 +E). Ventral lips rounded, as long as wide, about half of the dorsal lips length, extending from the central margin of the branchial lobes ( +Fig. 1 +H), filled with hyaline cartilage ( +Figs 8 +A–C). Ventral radiolar appendages: 6 (3–7) pairs of similar length, about one quarter of the branchial crown length, originate just ventral to ventral lips ( +Figs 9 +A–B), continuous with ventral extensions of inner margins of branchial lobes ( +Fig. 1 +H). + + +Peristomium +: Anterior peristomial ring lobe not exposed beyond collar, distally entire, triangular. Posterior peristomial ring collar: antero­dorsal, lateral and ventral margins entire, ventral margin slightly higher than dorsal ( +Figs 1 +A–B), entire length of mid­dorsal collar margins form a narrow gap. Ventral shield of collar swollen, horseshoe­shaped, two times wider than long; ventral shield divided transversally by a white and slender line, the anterior half transparent ( +Fig. 1 +A). The posterior peristomial ring collar length is as long as 1.5 times the length of chaetiger +2 in +lateral view. + + +Thorax +: Chaetiger 1: Notopodia: two groups of 14–16 chaetae, chaetae from the exterior group twice longer than interior group ( +Fig. 3 +A). Chaetigers 2 to 8: Notopodia: superior group with two irregular rows of elongate, narrowly hooded chaetae, each row with 30 (26–42) chaetae ( +Fig. 3 +B); inferior group with one anterior row with 16 (18–28) short bayonet chaetae ( +Figs 3 +B–C), 2 posterior rows with 22 (31–43) symmetrical, paleate chaetae with short mucro ( +Figs 3 +B–C). Pre­ and post­chaetal lobes well developed ( +Fig. 3 +B). Neuropodia: 29 (39–45) acicular uncini per tori, distributed as an irregular double row (except in juveniles); heads in the same direction ( +Fig. 3 +F); the oldest upper parts of the tori have only one row (one quarter of the tori length); main fang surmounted by four rows of teeth in frontal view, occupying less than half of the main fang length; teeth unequal in size ( +Fig. 4 +A). Biannulate condition in thoracic segments is given by the presence of well differentiate intersegmental grooves, and inter­notopodial and interneuropodial grooves, less differentiated than intersegmental ( +Figs 1 +A–B). Glandular ridge on chaetiger 2, narrow, just below chaetal lobe and tori ( +Figs 1 +A–B, 2C, 11A, F–G). + + +Abdomen +: Abdominal segments: 44 (28–76). Anterior segments: two transverse rows of 22 elongate, narrowly hooded chaetae, chaetae from the upper row half as long as chaetae in lower row ( +Figs 3 +D–E); 25 (29–33) uncini per tori ( +Fig. 3 +G), older and younger uncini with the main fang surmounted by five rows of teeth in frontal view, occupying less than half of the main fang length ( +Fig. 4 +B), main fang not extending beyond breast ( +Fig. 1 +G). Posterior segments: 23–28 very elongate, narrowly hooded chaetae, 25% longer than those of anterior segments ( +Fig. 3 +E); 3 (3–4) uncini per torus, similar to anterior segments, but shorter ( +Figs 1 +J, 4C). Intersegmental grooves well differentiate, inter­notopodial and inter­neuropodial grooves less differentiated than intersegmental. Pygidium with rounded posterior margin ( +Fig. 1 +D). + + +Gametes +: +Lectotype +is a female, oocytes in all thoracic and abdominal segments, diameter 6.07 m. Specimens from CMN 3870 are females with oocytes distributed in all thoracic and abdominal segments; males with sperm in anterior abdominal chaetigers, spermatids develop in tetrads, and mushroom­shaped acrosom. + + +Methyl green staining +: The epidermis is completely glandularized and stains uniformly in thorax and abdomen, dorsal and ventrally, except in except intersegmental grooves, inter­notochaetal and neurochaetal grooves, and both pre and post­chaetal lobes ( +Figs 1 +A–B). The collar segment is darker in the anterior half, except for anterior end of the ventral shield of collar. + + + + +Remarks +: Scanning electron microscopy revealed an important character in this species: teeth above the main fang of thoracic acicular uncini are of unequal size ( +Fig. 4 +A). +Fitzhugh (1989) +thought that all the teeth above main fang were of the same size, and that the presence of unequal­sized teeth was a synapomorphy for + +Amphicorina +Claparède, 1864 + +. This character is, however, homoplastic, occurring in most of the fabriciin genera, and its presence is now documented in + +C. infundibuliformis + +, + +C. georgesi + +( +Fig. 4 +D), + +C. americana + +( +Fig. 4 +G) and + +C. farringtonae + +( +Fig. 4 +J). In + +C. infundibuliformis + +, the only feature that tends to be dependent on size and age is the presence of thoracic uncini distributed as irregular double row in adults ( +Fig. 3 +F), while in juveniles there is only one row of uncini per torus. + + +The presence of modified uncini in posterior abdominal segments as rasp­shaped plates or + +Amphicorina + +­ +type +(see +Rouse 1994 +: Fig. 17) have been recorded or illustrated in some species of + +Chone + +: + +C. longiseta +Giangrande, 1992 + +, + +C. acustica +Claparède, 1870 + +, and + +C. filicaudata +Southern, 1914 + +(in +Giangrande 1992 +); + +C. trilobata +Gallardo, 1968 + +, +C +. sp.1, +C +. sp. 2, +C +. sp. 3, +C +. sp. 4 and +C +. sp. 6 (in +Fitzhugh, 2002 +); + +C. americana +Day, 1973 + +, + +C. diazi + +, + +C. farringtonae + +, + +C. johnstonae + +, + +C. perkinsi + +and + +C. uebelackerae +( +Tovar­Hernández, 2005 +) + +. This kind of modified uncini ( +Figs 4 +F, I, L, O) have a main fang surmounted by several regular, vertical rows of small teeth of equal size that occupy at least three quarters of the main fang length, and a poorly developed rectangular or sub­rectangular breast, instead of a few rows of unequal­sized teeth occupying less than half of the main fang length and a well developed breast, as anterior segment uncini ( +Fig 4 +E, H, K, N). However, anterior and posterior abdominal uncini are similar in shape in the +type +species. They possess a well developed main fang surmounted by a few smaller teeth that occupy less than half of its length ( +Figs 4 +B–C) and are irregularly arranged in an overlapping pattern, instead of a uniform set of rows ( +Fig. 4 +C). The breast is well developed and main fang does not extend beyond it. Other species reviewed with anterior and posterior abdominal uncini of similar shape include: + +C. aurantiaca + +[MCZ 1933, +holotype +], + +C. gracilis + +[USNM 5513, +holotype +], + +C. magna + +[USNM 17281, +holotype +], + +C. mollis + +[YPM 2793, +holotype +] and + +C. picta + +[YPM 30002]. + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Chone infundibuliformis + +. A) Anterior end of the body, ventral view, B) same, lateral view, C) thoracic uncini from chaetiger 4, D) last abdominal segmentes and pygidium, E) dorsal lips, dorsal view, F) base of the branchial crown, longitudinal section, G) anterior abdominal uncinus, H) dorsal lips, dorsal view, I) dorsal lips, ventro­frontal view, J) abdominal uncinus from last chaetiger. A–B, C, G) ZMUC–POL 1749, lectotype; D) CMN 3867; E–F, J) USNM 372, paralectotype; H–I) ZMUC–POL 1765. +bcs +: basal, central skeleton, +bl +: branchial lobe, +dl +: dorsal lip, +dpa +: dorsal pinnular appendage, +fg +: faecal groove, +gr +: glandular ridge, +pm +: palmate membrane, +rd +: radiole dorsalmost, +rv +: radiole ventralmost, +vl +: ventral lip, +vpa +: ventral pinnular appendages, +vsc +: ventral shield of collar. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Chone infundibuliformis + +. A) Radioles, median region, B) radiolar tip, C) second thoracic chaetiger. A–C) USNM 372, paralectotype. Scale bars: A) 0.8 mm, B) 0.2 mm, C) 1 mm. +fl +: flange, +gr +: glandular ridge, +neu +: neurochaetae, +not +: notochaetae, +pi +: pinnule, +pm +: palmate membrane, +r +: radiole. + + + +In those species of + +Chone + +with modified, posterior abdominal uncini, the presence of a posterior, latero­ventral depression is easily seen (see +Tovar­Hernández 2005 +, +Fig. 11 +B); however, this depression is not the same as the anal depression in + +Euchone +Malmgren, 1866 + +. In + +Euchone + +, the anal depression (=anal plate, funnel, spoon­shaped cavity or scoop) is ventral and extends from the pygidium through a varying number of abdominal chaetigers ( +Fitzhugh 1989 +). +Cochrane (2003) +recognized the anal depression as either being bordered by lateral wings or clearly demarcated by anterior and/or lateral ridges; she also detected a degree of ambiguity between a posteriorly enlarged faecal groove or dorsoventral depression in certain + +Chone + +and + +Amphicorina + +species, and a poorly developed anal depression in some + +Euchone + +. In species of + +Euchone + +, the + +Amphicorina + +­ +type +abdominal uncini are primarily located in the area of the anal depression ( +Banse 1970 +; +Fitzhugh 1989 +); in species of + +Chone + +with modified abdominal uncini ( + +C. georgesi + +( +Fig. 4 +F), + +C. americana + +( + +Fig. +4 + +I), + +C. farringtonae + +( +Fig. 4 +L) and + +C. princei + +( +Fig. 4 +O)), they are also located in the segments of the latero­ventral depression. + + +Histology + + + + +Gross observations + + +The branchial crown in + +C. infundibuliformis + +is supported basally by a central mass of cartilaginous skeleton and two lateral bars or horns of cartilaginous skeleton, both completely separated, independent one of another. +i +) The basal central mass of cartilaginous skeleton ( +bcs +) is located above the sub­esophageal ganglia ( +Figs 5 +A, 6A), divided basally and covered antero­laterally by smooth muscle ( +m +) ( +Fig. 6 +A). +ii +) The lateral bars or horns of cartilaginous skeleton ( +bls +) are composed of a large mass of cells in the base of the branchial lobes extending through radioles as two rows of cells ( +Figs 5 +A, 6A). + + +The branchial crown is vascularized by two large blood vessels ( +bv +) ( +Figs 5 +A, 6A); each vessel is covered by a coelomic chamber ( +cc +) and conjunctive tissue ( +ct +) ( +Fig. 5 +C). The branchial crown is innervated ( +n +) at the base of each branchial lobe ( +Figs 5 +A, D, 6A) and supported with hyaline cartilage on lateral sides of mouth ( +m +) ( +Fig. 5 +A). The hyaline cartilage is constituted of chondrocytes ( +c +) and a homogeneous eosinophilic matrix ( +cm +) ( +Fig. 5 +E). Some muscular fibers ( +mf +) are disposed in dense bundles in different directions ( +Fig. 5 +B). + + +Dorsal lips and dorsal pinnular appendages + + +The dorsal lips are vascularized by a plexus of small blood vessels ( +bv +) than run along the lip as strongly branched network ( +Figs 6 +B–C, 7A); each blood vessel is surrounded by coelomic chambers ( +cc +) ( +Figs 6 +B–C). These blood vessels are derived from the basal branchial blood vessels, which further back communicate with the dorsal vessel ( +Fig. 6 +A). The dorsal lips have hyaline cartilage, but there is no extension of the branchial skeleton. The hyaline cartilage ( +hc +) extends into the middle region of the dorsal lip and along the inner lip margin ( +Fig. 7 +A); it is composed of abundant collagen fibers ( +cf +) forming a net, and spread condrocytes ( +c +) ( +Figs 7 +A–C, E). The dorsal lips have conjuntive tissue ( +ct +) extending along the outer margin of the lip ( +Figs 6 +B–C, 7A). Two +types +of simple epithelium are present in dorsal lips: columnar ( +gce +) and cubic ( +gcue +) ( +Fig. 7 +B). The columnar epithelium covers the external/outer margin of the lips ( +Figs 6 +B–C, 7B), includes ciliated cells ( +ci +) ( +Figs 6 +B–C) and +type +“c” glands ( +Fig. 7 +B), and is covered by cuticle ( +cu +) ( +Figs. 6 +B–C, 7B). The cubic epithelium covers the internal/inner margin of the lip ( +Fig. 7 +B), there are not ciliated cells ( +Fig. 6 +B–C), but contains +types +“a” and “b” glands, and is covered by cuticle ( +Figs 7 +B, D). + + + +FIGURE 3. + +Chone infundibuliformis + +. A) First thoracic chaetiger, B) second thoracic chaetiger, C) paleate and bayonet chaetae from second chaetiger, D) chaetigers from anterior abdominal segments, E) chaetigers from medial abdominal segments, F) uncini from second thoracic chaetiger, G) anterior abdominal torus. A–G) CMN 3867. Scale bars: A–B, D–E) 100 m, C, F–G) 10 m. A–G: SEM UNAM. + + + + +FIGURE 4. +Comparison of thoracic, anterior and posterior abdominal uncini. A, D, G, J, M) Thoracic uncini; B, E, H, K, N) anterior abdominal uncini; C, F, I, L, O) posterior abdominal uncini. A–C) + +C. infundibuliformis + +CMN 3867, D–F) + +C. georgesi + +ECOSUR, G–I) + +C. americana + +FSBC EJ71414, J–L) + +C. farringtonae + +FSBC I 66734, M–O) + +C. princei + +CMN 1989–0394. Scale bars: B) 10 m, F) 5 m, I) 1.5 m. A, C, D–E, G–H, J–O: SEM ECOSUR Tapachula; B, F, I: SEM UNAM. + + + + +FIGURE 5. + +Chone infundibuliformis + +. Base of the branchial crown, transversal section. A) Panoramic view, B) detail of 1 in A, conjunctive tissue, C) detail of 2 in A, branchial blood vessel, D) detail of 3 in A, nerves, E) detail of 4, hyaline cartilage. A–E) CMN 3867. Scale bars: A) 1.5 mm, B, D) 100 m, C) 165 m, E) 50 m. +bcs +: basal central skeleton, +bl +: branchial lobe, +bls +: basal, lateral skeleton, +bv +: blood vessel, +c +: chondrocyte, +cc +: coelomic chamber, +cm +: cartilage matrix, +ct +: conjunctive tissue, +dl +: dorsal lip, +dmr +: dorsalmost radiole, +dpa +: dorsal pinnular appendages, +mf +: muscular fibers, +mo +: mouth, +n +: nerves. + + + + +FIGURE 6. + +Chone infundibuliformis + +. Base of the branchial crown, longitudinal section. A) Panoramic view, B) tip of the right dorsal lip, C) base of the right dorsal lip. A–C) SMNH 73076. Scale bars: A) 0.5 mm, B–C) 100 m. +b +: brain, +bcs +: basal central skeleton, +bl +: branchial lobe, +bls +: basal, lateral skeleton, +bv +: blood vessel, +cc +: coelomic chamber, +ci +: cilia, +ct +: conjunctive tissue, +cu +: cuticle, +dl +: dorsal lip, +dpa +: dorsal pinnular appendages, +gce +: glandular, columnar epithelium, +gcue +: glandular, cubic epithelium, +m +: muscle, +rs +: radiolar skeleton. + + + + +FIGURE 7. + +Chone infundibuliformis + +. Dorsal lip, transversal section. A) Panoramic view, B) anterior tip showing the hyaline cartilage and glandular types, C) central, internal margin, D) glands from central, internal margin, E) hyaline cartilage, F) dorsal pinnular appendages. A–F) SMNH 73076. Scale bars: A) 250 m, B) 100 m, C) 75 m, D) 25 m, E) 50 m, F) 62.5 m. “ +a +”: gland type a, “ +b +”: gland type b, “ +c +”: gland type c, +bv +: blood vessel, +c +: chondrocyte, +ci +: cilia, +cm +: cartilage matrix, +ct +: conjunctive tissue, +dpa +: dorsal pinnular appendages, +gce +: glandular, columnar epithelium, +gcue +: glandular, cubic epithelium, +hc +: hyaline cartilage, +mf +: muscular fibers, +ps +: pinnular skeleton. + + + + +FIGURE 8. + +Chone infundibuliformis + +. Ventral lip, transversal section. A) Panoramic view, B) undeveloped radioles, C) hyaline cartilage. A–C) SMNH 73076. Scale bars: A) 200 m, B) 50 m, C) 75 m. +bv +: blood vessel, +ci +: cilia, +hc +: hyaline cartilage, +rs +: radiolar skeleton, +unr +: undeveloped radioles. + + + +The external pinnula of each dorsalmost radiole is fused with six pinnules ( +dpa +) towards the dorsal, central margin of the branchial crown, above of the basal, central skeleton ( +Figs 5 +A, 6A); they are united by a glandular, columnar epithelium composed of ciliated and +types +“b”, “c”, “d” glands. Each dorsal pinnular appendage contains a central blood vessel surrounded by the coelom, and associated with the pinnular skeleton and hyaline cartilage ( +Fig. 7 +F). + + +Ventral lips and ventral radiolar appendages + + +The ventral margins of the ventral lips are each fused with three undeveloped radioles ( +unr +) ( +Fig. 8 +A–B). The ventral lips are composed of hyaline cartilage ( +hc +) ( +Figs 8 +A–C) and ciliated epithelium and +type +“c” glands. + + +Radioles + + +The epithelium of radioles is simple columnar, covered by cuticle ( +cu +) and composed of +type +“c” glands ( +Figs 9 +A–B). One pair of nerves ( +n +) is between each pair of radioles ( +Fig. 9 +A). In cross section, the radiolar skeleton ( +rs +) is covered by hyaline cartilage, composed of a dense cartilage matrix ( +cm +) with few chondrocytes ( +c +) ( +Fig. 9 +C); in transversal section, the radiolar skeleton ( +rs +) continues into each pinnule ( +ps +), which is divided by longitudinal muscle ( +m +) and conjunctive tissue ( +ct +) ( +Fig. 9 +D). Directly from the branchial blood vessel, which further back communicates with the dorsal vessel, a small blood vessel branches off to each radiole and then, into each pinnule, surrounded by a coelomic chamber ( +cc +) ( +Fig. 9 +E). In cross section, each radiole is composed of a central endoskeleton axis consisting of two large cartilaginous cells ( +rs +) ( +Fig. 9 +A), longitudinal muscle ( +m +) and two pairs of nerves ( +n +) running along the basal groove, and ciliated epithelium in the basal groove of the radiole ( +ci +) ( +Figs 9 +A, D–E). + + + +FIGURE 9. + +Chone infundibuliformis + +. Radiole. A) Anterior part of radioles, B) detail of epithelium, C) hyaline cartilage, D) radiolar and pinnular skeleton, E) posterior part of radiole. A–E) SMNH 73076. A–C, E: transversal section, D: longitudinal section. Scale bars: A) 100 m, B) 50 m, C) 16.25 m, D) 70 m, E) 115 m. “ +c +”: gland type c, +bv +: blood vessel, +c +: chondrocyte, +cc +: coelomic chamber, +ci +: cilia, +cm +: cartilage matrix, +ct +: conjunctive tissue, +cu +: cuticle, +m +: muscle, +n +: nerves, +ps +: pinnular skeleton, +rs +: radiolar skeleton. + + + + +FIGURE 10. + +Chone infundibuliformis + +. Collar, longitudinal section. A) Panoramic view, B) external epithelium, C) internal epithelium, D–E) central axis of hyaline cartilage. A–E) CMN 3867. Scale bars: A) 0.6 mm, B) 12.5 m, C–D) 50 m, E) 30 m. “ +b +”: gland type b, “ +c +”: gland type c, +cm +: cartilage matrix, +cu +: cuticle, +hc +: hyaline cartilage, +vsc +: ventral shield of collar. + + + +Collar + + +The mid­ventral margin of the posterior peristomial ring collar consist of a broad central axis of hyaline cartilage ( +hc +), including the area of the ventral shield of collar ( +vsc +) ( +Fig. 10 +A); composed of a dense cartilage matrix ( +cm +) with few chondrocytes ( +Figs 10 +A, D–E) and covered on both sides by glandular epithelium with +types +“a”, “b” and “c” glands (markedly basophilic and substantially larger) and cuticle ( +cu +) ( +Figs 10 +A–C). + + +Epithelium and glandular ridge on chaetiger 2 + + +The epithelium of + +Chone infundibuliformis + +has +type +“a”, “b” and “c” glands markedly basophilic and substantially larger, covered by cuticle ( +cu +) ( +Figs11 +A, D–F). Each intersegmental division is reinforced with conjunctive tissue ( +ct +) and nerves ( +n +) ( +Fig. 11 +B). At the base of the epithelium, there are several nerves ( +n +) and blood vessels ( +bv +) ( +Figs 11 +A, C). The glandular ridge in + +C. infundibuliformis + +and + +C. aurantiaca + +occupies only the external half of the epithelium; it is composed of strongly differentiated acidophil glandular cells ( +ag +), tubular­shaped with granulose secretions ( +Fig. 11 +A, G, 12A–D). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/24/5F/37245F3B29AE85006EF2AEB0A2B858CD.xml b/data/37/24/5F/37245F3B29AE85006EF2AEB0A2B858CD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..027eac244cd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/24/5F/37245F3B29AE85006EF2AEB0A2B858CD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part L) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +610 +650 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Lepidium latifolium +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 644. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Galliae, Angliae umbrosis, succulentis." RCN: 4687. + + + + +Lectotype +(Jafri in Nasir & Ali, +Fl. W. Pakistan +55: 60. 1973): Herb. Linn. No. 824.11a ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Generitype +of + +Lepidium +Linnaeus + +(vide Green, +Prop. Brit. Bot. +: 170. 1929). + + + + +Current name: + +Lepidium latifolium +L. + +( +Brassicaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/24/89/3724895558823DDC33B74F1F6E537D34.xml b/data/37/24/89/3724895558823DDC33B74F1F6E537D34.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c4ae8926e58 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/24/89/3724895558823DDC33B74F1F6E537D34.xml @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + +Illustrated type catalogue of Amphidromus Albers, 1850 in the Natural History Museum, London, and descriptions of two new species + + + +Author + +Sutcharit, Chirasak + + + +Author + +Ablett, Jonathan + + + +Author + +Tongkerd, Piyoros + + + +Author + +Naggs, Fred + + + +Author + +Panha, Somsak + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +492 + + +49 +105 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.492.8641 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.492.8641 +1313-2970-492-49 +334F0DAA1CD140F49B8CA62E4A97A732 + + + + +Taxon +classification Animalia Stylommatophora Camaenidae + + + + +Amphidromus quadrasi solida Fulton, 1896 + + + + +Amphidromus quadrasi var. solida +Fulton, 1896a: 86, pl. 5, fig. 16. + + + +Type locality. +Palawan [Philippines]. + + +Type material. +Lectotype NHMUK 1896.6.13.10 (Fig. 14K; H=31.5 mm, W=16.3 mm). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/24/B3/3724B35BBA7152D091CAA2E250645404.xml b/data/37/24/B3/3724B35BBA7152D091CAA2E250645404.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2c33e939d95 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/24/B3/3724B35BBA7152D091CAA2E250645404.xml @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@ + + + +Inflorescences of Fargesia angustissima T. P. Yi and Yushania pauciramificans T. P. Yi (Poaceae, Bambusoideae) shed light on the taxonomy of the Sino-Himalayan alpine bamboos + + + +Author + +Ye, Xia-Ying +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2066-945X +Agronomy and Life Science Department, Zhaotong University, Zhaotong, Yunnan 657000, China & Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China + + + +Author + +Xu, Zu-Chang +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7431-1061 +Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China + + + +Author + +Cheng, Yue-Hong +Sichuan Wolong National Natural Reserve Administration, Aba, Sichuan, 623000, China + + + +Author + +Wang, Wei-Hua +Agronomy and Life Science Department, Zhaotong University, Zhaotong, Yunnan 657000, China + + + +Author + +Li, De-Zhu +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4990-724X +Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China +dzl@mail.kib.ac.cn + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2022 + +2022-12-09 + + +215 + + +27 +36 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.215.94010 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.215.94010 +1314-2003-215-27 +F716E4064D935CCE9DD05DF49388F706 + + + + +Fargesia angustissima T.P. Yi + + + + + +"油竹子" +(You Zhu Zi) Fig. 1 + + + + + +Fargesia angustissima +T.P. Yi in J. Bamboo Res. 4(2): 21-22. pl. 4. 1985; Keng f. & Z. P. Wang, Fl. Reippubl. Poppularis. Sin. 9(1): 437. pl. 50, 1-8. 1996; D. Z. Li and Stapleton in Z. Y. Wu, P. H. Raven & D. Y. Hong, Fl. China 22: 85-86. 2006. L. B. Zhang in C. Y. Wu, P. H. Raven & H. Y. Hong, Fl. China Illustr. 22: 110. pl. 110: 1-7. 2007. +'Type' +: China. Sichuan: Wenchuan County, Genda Township, 1550 m alt., live on limestone slope, 22 Sept. 1974, +T.P. Yi 74450 +(holotype, SCFI!); ibid., 31°4.27'N, 103°19.64'E, 1434 m alt., 23 Dec. 2021, +WL2021001 +(epitype designated here, KUN, 1546903!). + + +Yushania ferax angustissima +≡ +Yushania ferax subsp. angustissima +(T.P. Yi) Demoly in Bambou. Bull. A. E. B., Sect. France. 46: 8. 2005. + + +Borinda angustissima +≡ +Borinda angustissima +(T.P. Yi) Stapleton in Sida. 22(1): 332, 2006. + + + +Description. + +Culms densely unicaespitose, 4-7 m tall, 1-2 cm in diameter; internodes terete, 28-35 cm long, glabrous, initially white powdery, longitudinal ribs very prominent; culm walls 1.5-2.5 mm thick; sheath scars prominent. Buds oblong. Branches 5-10 per node, slender. Culm sheaths persistent or gradually deciduous, much longer than internodes, distantly papery and narrowly banded, abaxially sparsely brown setulose, margins initially densely ciliate; auricles absent; oral setae 3-5, 5-7 mm long; ligules ca. 1 mm tall; blade reflexed, linear, narrower than apex of sheath, margins usually serrulate, readily deciduous. Foliage leaves 3-5 per branchlet; auricles absent; oral setae 5-8, 2-3 mm long; ligules convex, ca. 0.5 mm tall, external ligule pubescent; blades (1.7) 3.4-9.5 +x +0.3-0.7 cm, narrowly lanceolate, abaxially proximally pubescent, second veins 2 (3) pairs, transverse veins distinct. + +Flowering branches 18-60 cm long, with secondary branches; raceme composed of 1-3 spikelets, open to dense, flowering branchlet with terminal leaves 1-2, gradually deciduous, subtended by slightly inflated foliage-leaf-like sheaths, initially stretching out from one side of the sheaths; axes terete, glabrous, usually with a bract at the base of pedicels, bract lanceolate, 5 mm long. Spikelet purple-green to dark purple, 2-4 cm long, 7-10 mm wide, clustered closely; pedicels slender, curved or undulate, glabrous, 7-15 mm long; florets 2-8, 1.5-2 cm long; rachilla internode 2 mm long, expanded and pubescent at apex. Glumes 2, papery, apex acuminate, the first one narrowly lanceolate, 9-12 mm long, 2 mm wide, pubescent, apically awned, ca. 3 mm long; the second one ovoid-lanceolate, 11-15 mm long, ca. 2 mm wide, pubescent, apically awned, ca. 5 mm long. Lemma papery, ovoid-lanceolate, 15-19 mm long, 4-5 mm wide, abaxially scabrous, densely white setose, apically awned, 5-6 mm long; palea shorter than lemma, thinly papery, 5-10 mm long, 2-keeled, sulcate between keels, upper part of keels ciliate, apex obtuse. Lodicules 3, membranous, transparent, elliptical-triangular, margins ciliate. Stamens 3, filaments free, anthers yellow, gradually dark purple, ovary long-ovoid, glabrous. Stigmas 3, plumose. Caryopses oblong, dark brown, ventrally grooved, 6-9 mm long, ca. 1-2 mm in diameter, glabrous, apex with persistent style. + + +Figure 1. + +Fargesia angustissima + +T.P. Yi +A +habitat, showing flowering population +B +branches and internode +C +clum +D +branchlet, showing foliage leaves +E +culm sheath +F +flowering branches +G +inflorescence +H +anatomy of florets +I +fruit. + + + + +Phenology. +New shoots May to August. Flowering December to April; fruiting May to June. + + +Distribution and habitat. + + +Fargesia angustissima + +is known from Dujiangyan, Wenchuan and Chongzhou of western Sichuan, and Beichuan and Pingwu of northwestern Sichuan, and mainly occurs on the steep limestone slope or along the stream at an elevation of 800-1800 m. + + + +Additional specimens examined. + + +China +. +Sichuan +: +Beichuan County +, +Caijiaping +, near +Xiaozhaizigou Nature Reserve +, +09 Nov. 2017 +, +Y. X. Zhang +17142 (KUN!) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/25/1B/37251B32F37A9D8CF0C1919316D66F0F.xml b/data/37/25/1B/37251B32F37A9D8CF0C1919316D66F0F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8423cb2736b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/25/1B/37251B32F37A9D8CF0C1919316D66F0F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,561 @@ + + + +Incidence of pests and viral disease on pepino (Solanummuricatum Ait.) in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan + + + +Author + +Kim, Ok-Kyung + + + +Author + +Ishikawa, Tadashi + + + +Author + +Yamada, Yoshihiro + + + +Author + +Sato, Takuma + + + +Author + +Shinohara, Hirosuke + + + +Author + +Takahata, Ken + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2017 + +5 + + +14879 +14879 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e14879 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e14879 +1314-2828-5-14879 + + + + +Epitrix hirtipennis (Melsheimer, 1847) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +T. Ishikawa +; individualCount: +12 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00284 | 2017-00285 | 2017-00286 | 2017-00287 | 2017-00288 | 2017-00289 | 2017-00290 | 2017-00291 | 2017-00292 | 2017-00293 | 2017-00294 | 2017-00295; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-08-30 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +4 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00296 | 2017-00297 | 2017-00298 | 2017-00299; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-09-28 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +5 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00300 | 2017-00301 | 2017-00302 | 2017-00303 | 2017-00304; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-09-29 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +8 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00305 | 2017-00306 | 2017-00307 | 2017-00308 | 2017-00309 | 2017-00310 | 2017-00311 | 2017-00312; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-09-30 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +7 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00313 | 2017-00314 | 2017-00315 | 2017-00316 | 2017-00317 | 2017-00318 | 2017-00319; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-10-01 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +4 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00320 | 2017-00321 | 2017-00322 | 2017-00323; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-10-04 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +4 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00324 | 2017-00325 | 2017-00326 | 2017-00327; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-10-14 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +4 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00328 | 2017-00329 | 2017-00330 | 2017-00331; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-10-15 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +8 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00332 | 2017-00333 | 2017-00334 | 2017-00335 | 2017-00336 | 2017-00337 | 2017-00338 | 2017-00339; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-10-18 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00340; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-10-20 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00341; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-10-24 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +4 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00342 | 2017-00343 | 2017-00344 | 2017-00345; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-11-03 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +2 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00346 | 2017-00347; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-11-08 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00348; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-11-10 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00349; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-11-15 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00350; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-11-17 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Yamada +; individualCount: +2 +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2017-00351 | 2017-00352; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1847; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Coleoptera; family: Chrysomelidae; genus: Epitrix; specificEpithet: hirtipennis; scientificNameAuthorship: Melsheimer; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Kanagawa; municipality: Atsugi-shi; locality: +Atsugi Campus, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Funako +; minimumElevationInMeters: 49; maximumElevationInMeters: 49; decimalLatitude: +35.431707 +; decimalLongitude: +139.345165 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Y. Yamada +; dateIdentified: 2017; Event: samplingProtocol: +beating of leaves and branches (including visual searches) +; eventDate: +2016-11-25 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +LETUA +; collectionCode: +IC + + + + +Notes + +Known as a recent alien species to Japan ( +Harada and Takizawa 2012 +) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/25/87/372587BA940AFFCCFF43FA11AEB7F7D0.xml b/data/37/25/87/372587BA940AFFCCFF43FA11AEB7F7D0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..398fccafdf6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/25/87/372587BA940AFFCCFF43FA11AEB7F7D0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,564 @@ + + + +Eugenia pokkudanii (Myrtaceae): a new species from Sky Islands of Nelliyampathy, Kerala, India + + + +Author + +Manoharan, Maya Ammathil +0000-0002-1626-9042 +Department of Botany, Government Victoria College, Palakkad (University of Calicut) - 67800, Kerala, India. & malukutty 7593 @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 1626 - 9042 +malukutty7593@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Prabhukumar, Konickal Mambetta +0000-0003-3341-2717 +Centre for Medicinal Plants Research (CMPR), Arya Vaidya Sala, Kottakkal, Malappuram- 676503, Kerala, India; (Present address: PDSH Division, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow. & prabhumkrishna @ gmail. com; http: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 3341 - 2717 +prabhumkrishna@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Jose, Sojan +0000-0002-9763-9251 +Department of Botany, Government College, Chittur, Palakkad (University of Calicut) - 678104, Kerala, India. & sojanchakkalackal @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 9763 - 9251 +sojanchakkalackal@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Veerankutty, Suresh +0000-0001-7350-9236 +Department of Botany, Government Victoria College, Palakkad (University of Calicut) - 67800, Kerala, India. & sureshmagnolia @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 7350 - 9236 +sureshmagnolia@gmail.com + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2021 + +2021-05-25 + + +502 + + +3 + + +283 +288 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.502.3.6 + +journal article +4423 +10.11646/phytotaxa.502.3.6 +b7ba273d-5463-4d71-951a-39929e6c6a05 +1179-3163 +5425119 + + + + + + +Eugenia pokkudanii +A.M. Maya, K.M. Prabhukumar & V. Suresh + +, + +sp. nov. + +Figures 1–3 +. + + + + + +Diagnosis:— + +Eugenia pokkudanii + +shows morphological similarities with + +E. discifera +Gamble (1918: 239) + +, but differs mainly by lateral nerves 6–8 pairs (versus 10–15 pairs in + +E. discifera + +), petioles +2–5 mm +long (vs. +6–10 mm +long), flowers +0.7–1 cm +across (vs. up to +2 cm +across), pedicels +0.3–0.56 cm +long (vs. +0.5–0.9 cm +long), bracteoles oblong (vs. lanceolate), calyx tubes +0.9–1.5 mm +long (vs. +2–3 mm +long), calyx lobes +1.6–2.5 mm +wide (vs. +4–5 mm +wide) and petals broadly elliptic (vs. orbicular). It is also similar to + +Eugenia indica +( +Wight 1842: 523 +) +Chithra (1983: 153) + +, but differs from it by its blades with 6–8 pairs of lateral veins (versus 5–6 pairs in + +E. indica + +), petioles +2–5 mm +long (vs. +3–8 mm +long), bracteoles oblong (vs. linear), calyx tubes +0.9–1.5 mm +long (vs. +4–6 mm +long), calyx lobes +1.6–2.5 mm +wide (vs. ca. +5 mm +wide) and petals broadly elliptic (vs. orbicular). See also +Table 1 +. + + + + +TABLE 1. +Morphological comparison of + +Eugenia pokkudanii + +with + +E. discifera + +and + +E. indica + +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Characters + + +Eugenia pokkudanii + + + +E. discifera + + + +E. indica + +
Leavesellipticobovate or elliptic-ovateelliptic-obovate or oblanceolate
Lateral vein nerves6–8 pairs10–15 pairs5–6 pairs
Petioles2–5 mm long6–10 mm long3–8 mm long
Flower at anthesis (diameter)0.7–1 cm acrossca.2 cm acrossca.1 cm across
Bracteolesoblonglanceolatelinear
Bracteoles length1.6–1.9 mm longca. 2 mm longca.3 mm long
Calyx tube length0.9–1.5 mm long2–3 mm long4–6 mm long
Calyx lobe width1.6–2.5 mm across4–5 mm acrossca. 5 mm across
Calyx lobes indumentumRusty brown long hairs on the abaxial side and floccose white pubescent on adaxial side.tomentose without, glabrous withinFulvous tomentose, glabrous within
Petalsbroadly ellipticorbicularorbicular
Seeds1-21-2many
+ + + +Type:— + + +INDIA +. + +Kerala +, +Palakkad District +, +Nelliyampathy +, +Keshavanpara +, + +1002 m + +, +10°32’26.79” N +, +76°40’49.23”E +, + +23 March 2019 + +, + +A +. +M + + + +. + +Maya +, +K +. +M + +. + + + +Prabhukumar +& +Suresh +V +. +GVCP-SV122 + +( +holotype +MH +!, isotype +CALI +!) + +. + + + + +Description:— +Large shrubs to small trees, +2–4 m +height; profusely branched; branches terete, rusty brown appressed, sparsely pubescent; branchlets terete, greenish brown, rusty brown appressed pubescent; internodes +1.5–2.2 cm +long. Leaves coriaceous, petiolate; lamina elliptic, 1.5–6.3 × +0.5–2.5 cm +, base cuneate to attenuate, margins entire slightly revolute, apex obtuse to rounded, adaxially green glabrous and abaxially silvery whitish green, sparsely rusty brown puberulent at middle and apex, brown appressed puberulent at leaf base, midvein not conspicuous; lateral veins 6–8 pairs; Petiole +2mm +– +5mm +long, slender, terete, green, rusty brown appressed tomentose. Inflorescences solitary or few-flowered, axillary or lateral. Flowers at anthesis +0.8–1.3 cm +long × +0.7–1 cm +in diameter, white, pedicellate; pedicels 3–5.6 × +0.3–0.9 mm +, slender, terete, green, floccose rusty hairy; bracteoles 2, 1.6–1.9 × +0.4–0.5 mm +, oblong, rounded at apex, green, floccose brown pubescent abaxially, white–brown appressed pubescent adaxially; hypanthium campanulate; calyx tube 0.9–1.5 × +1.5–1.7 mm +, green, floccose brown pubescent; calyx lobes 4, 1.6–1.8 × +1.6–2.5 mm +, orbicular to suborbicular, margin ciliate, rusty brown long hairs on abaxial side, floccose white pubescent adaxially; petals 4, broadly elliptic, 3–6 × +3.6–6.2 mm +, margins entire, recurved at apex, pellucid, glabrous, white suffused with brown and purple stripes on abaxial side at tip. Androecium apostemonous; stamens extrorse, dithecous, numerous; staminal disk +3.2–4.6 mm +in diameter, broad, fulvous white pubescent; filaments terete, +4.5–7 mm +long, slender, white, gland-dotted, glabrous; anthers 2-celled, oblong, 0.6–0.7 × +0.55–0.6 mm +, dorsifixed, yellowish brown and gland-dotted. Ovary +1.5–1.6 mm +in diameter; style thick, 0.6–1.7 × +0.2–0.3 mm +, gland-dotted; stigma entire; locules 2; ovules +2 in +each locule, ovoid, +0.01–0.02 mm +in diameter; placentation axillary. Fruits berries, ellipsoid, 0.9–1.3 × +0.5–0.9 cm +, green when young and reddish orange when ripe, glabrous, crowned by the persistent calyx. Seeds 1–2. + + +Phenology:— +February to April. + + + + +Etymology:— +The species is named in honor of the late Mr. Kallen Pokkudan (1937–2015), an environmental activist from the state of +Kerala +, +India +, in recognition of his efforts for the protection and proliferation of the mangrove forests in +Kerala +. + + + + +Ecology:— +The new species is known only from the +type +locality and grows as a small tree between +900 to 1000 m +elev. + + + + +Paratypes +:— + +INDIA +. +Kerala +, +Palakkad District +, +Nelliyampathy +, +Pothumala +, + +13 March 2019 + +, + +A +. +M + + +. + + +Maya +& +Suresh +V +. +GVCP-SV113 + +( +MH +!). +Pothumala +, + +20 February 2020 + +, + +A +. +M + + +. + + +Maya +& +Suresh +V +. +GVCP-SV269 + +( +CALI +!). +Keshavanpara +, + +21 February 2020 + +, + +A +. +M + + +. + + +Maya +& +Suresh +V +. +GVCP-SV270 + +( +KFRI +!) + +. + + + + +FIGURE 1. +A. general aspect; B. Flower; C. Fruit & twigs with glaucous surface: D. Habit; E. Adaxial side of leaf; F.Abaxial side of leaf; G. Leaf apex, adaxial side; H. Brown indumentum at the abaxial side of leaf base. (Photos: K.M. Prabhukumar based on + +A.M. Maya, K.M. Prabhukumar & +Suresh +V. GVCP-SV122. + +) + + + + +FIGURE 2. +A. Flower bud; B. Staminal disk; C. Pedicel with two bracteoles; D. Petal, adaxial side; E. Calyx lobes; F. Petal, abaxial side; G. Stamen; H. Longitudinal section of flower bud; I. Young fruit with persistent calyx lobes; J. Transversal section of ovary; K. Longitudinal section of opened flower without petals. (Photos: A.M. Maya based on + +A.M. Maya & +Suresh +V. GVCP-SV113 + +.) + + + + +Distribution and Habitat:— +Semi-evergreen patches of Keshavanpara and Pothumala hills of Nelliyampathy forest, Western Ghats, Palakkad, +Kerala +, +India +. + + +Conservation status +:— + +Eugenia pokkudanii + + +is known only from the +type +locality. The extent of occurrence ( +EOO +) of the species is estimated to be less than +1 km +2 +and the area of occupancy ( +AOO +) less than + +50 m + +2 +. Since the only extant locality is a tourist destination, it is possible to infer a reduction in the past of the potential habitat of the species. For this reason, the species can be categorized as Critically Endangered ( +CR +) based on criteria +B1 ++ +B2 +(a + bii + iii) + + +( + +IUCN 2019 + +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/25/8E/37258E6E3C345B13A5253C38F366E5E9.xml b/data/37/25/8E/37258E6E3C345B13A5253C38F366E5E9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8d5fefda29f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/25/8E/37258E6E3C345B13A5253C38F366E5E9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ + + + +Synoptic taxonomy of Cortaderia Stapf (Danthonioideae, Poaceae) + + + +Author + +Testoni, Daniel +Herbario BBB, Departamento de Biologia, Bioquimica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur, San Juan 670, CP- 8000 Bahia Blanca, Argentina +daniel.testoni@uns.edu.ar + + + +Author + +Linder, H. Peter +Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH- 8008 Zurich, Switzerland + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2017 + +2017-01-11 + + +76 + + +39 +69 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.76.10808 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.76.10808 +1314-2003-76-39 +FFBD980EFF8A8924FFD5FF9FFF903809 +238999 + + + + +5. +Cortaderia egmontiana (Roem. & Schult.) M.Lyle ex Connor, Darwiniana 49: 90. 2011. +Figs 1E +, 2E +, 3A + + + + +Arundo egmontiana +Roem. & Schult., Syst. Veg., ed. 15 b [Roemer & Schultes] 2: 511. 1817. +Phragmites egmontiana +(Roem. & Schult.) Trin. ex Steud., Nomen. Bot. (ed. 2) 2: 324. 1840. Type: Falkland / Malvinas Islands, Port Egmont, R. J. Schuttleworth s.n. (type: BM photo!). + + +Arundo pilosa +d'Urv +., +Mem +. Soc. Linn. Paris 4: 603. 1826; +Cortaderia pilosa +( +d'Urv +.) Hack. ex +Dusen +, Bol. Acad. Nac. Ci. 16: 253. 1900; +Gynerium pilosum +( +d'Urv +.) Macloskie in Scott, Rep. Princeton Univ. Exped. Patagonia, Botany 8, part 1: 213. 1904; +Phragmites pilosa +( +d'Urv +.) Macloskie & +Dusen +in Scott, Rep. Princeton Univ. Exped. Patagonia, Botany 8, suppl. bot.: 50. 1915. +Ampelodesmos australis +Brongn. in Duperrey, Voy. Monde 2(2): 31. 1829, nom. illeg. Type: Falkland / Malvinas Islands, 1825, J. S. C. D. +D'Urville +s.n. (central inflorescence designated as lectotype by Connor & Edgar, Taxon 23: 600 (1974): P 00740221! (http://mediaphoto.mnhn.fr/media/1443644100310dGB3ZqFqm8JGPDaz; isolectotype: B!). + + +Calamagrostis patula +Steud., Syn. Pl. Glumac. 1(6): 422. 1854. Type: Chile, Huiti, sine data, W. Lechler 760 (lectotype, selected here: P-00740220 (http://mediaphoto.mnhn.fr/media/1443644088798jsLY8AS29Euj4oHx); isolectotypes: GOET; W photo!) + + +Poa phragmites +Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 43: 576. 1873. Type: Chile, volcan de Osorno, 1872, C. Juliet s.n. (holotype: SGO photo! (http://plants.jstor.org/stable/viewer/10.5555/al.ap.specimen.sgo000000667; isotype: BAA! frag. ex SGO); + + +Gynerium nanum +Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 94: 155. 1896. Type: Falkland / Malvinas Islands, Dec. 1884, C. Martin s.n. (lectotype, designated as holotype by Connor & Edgar, Taxon 23: 600 (1974): SGO 065328!; isolectotype: BAA!). + + +Calamagrostis scirpiformis +Phil., Anales Univ. Chile 94: 20. 1896. Type: Chile, ad lacum Llanquihue, I-1866, F. Philippi s.n. (lectotype, designated here: SGO 37097; isolectotypes: US, BAA!) + + +Cortaderia minima +Conert, Syst. Anat. +Arundineae +119. 1961; +Cortaderia pilosa var. minima +(Conert) Nicora, Darwiniana 18(1-2): 80. 1973. Type: Chile, Andes, Villarrica, "in feuchten Schluchten nahe der Waldgrenze", 1897, F. W. Neger s.n. (lectotype, designated as holotype by Conert, Syst. Anat. +Arundineae +119 (1961): M; isolectotypes: W5945! B! fragm. ex M). + + + +Etymology. + +egmontiana +: called after Port Egmont in the Falklands / Malvinas Islands. + + + +Nomenclatural comments. + +Brongniart (1829) described + +Ampelodesmos australis + +, and explicitly included + +Arundo pilosa + +D'Urville +as a synonym, noting that this species is better placed in + +Ampelodesmos + +. + + + +Taxonomy. + +The species can be readily diagnosed by the combination of compact inflorescences, almost glabrous leaves, and either no, or poorly developed, awns and setae on the lemmas. The habit and dense inflorescences are as in + +Cortaderia sericantha + +, but + +Cortaderia egmontiana + +differs by the absence of setae, and by the almost completely glabrous leaves. The lemma and spikelet morphology (reduced or absent awns and setae) suggests an affinity to the eastern Brazilian species + +Cortaderia vaginata + +and + +Cortaderia modesta + +. From these two species + +Cortaderia egmontiana + +can be separated by the compact inflorescences and the tendency of the leaf blades to disarticulate from the sheaths. It is the only + +Cortaderia + +species in southern South American temperate zone. The leaf anatomy (Figs +2E +, +3A +) does not show any distinctive peculiarities. + + +There is remarkable intraspecific variation in the spikelet and floret sizes, and +Conert (1961) +separated the forms with smaller spikelets as + +Cortaderia minima + +. +Moore (1983) +suggested that the two taxa were latitudinally separated, with the southern populations constituting + +Cortaderia pilosa + +, and the northern + +Cortaderia minima + +. On the available material, there is indeed a break in the glume length variation. However, this fits no ecological or geographical pattern, and both small and large-glume forms occur in both the Falkland / Malvinas islands and Tierra del Fuego. Further north, indeed, only the small-glume form is found. This suggests that this size variation has no biological significance, accordingly it is ignored here. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/25/F8/3725F8B8BC98D8C4CBE2D97B905D7084.xml b/data/37/25/F8/3725F8B8BC98D8C4CBE2D97B905D7084.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f834114811d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/25/F8/3725F8B8BC98D8C4CBE2D97B905D7084.xml @@ -0,0 +1,163 @@ + + + +Isotomidae of Japan and the Asiatic part of Russia. I. Folsomia ' inoculata' group + + + +Author + +Potapov, Mikhail + + + +Author + +Hasegawa, Motohiro + + + +Author + +Kuznetsova, Natalia + + + +Author + +Babenko, Anatoly + + + +Author + +Kuprin, Alexander + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2018 + +750 + + +1 +40 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.750.22764 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.750.22764 +1313-2970-750-1 +B10B5506EF9F477480F4BC5A776FA266 +B10B5506EF9F477480F4BC5A776FA266 + + + + +Folsomia laconica Potapov & Kuznetsova +sp. n. +Figs 6, 51, 52, 54, 55-57, 90 + + + + +Type +material. + + +Holotype, female, Far East of Russia, Amurskaya Region, Khingansky Reserve, near (~6 km W) Kundur, valley of Karapcha River, northern steep slope, mixed forest with +Abies +, litter, 19.viii.2014, coll. M. Potapov and N. Kuznetsova. 15 paratypes from the same location and ten paratypes from Khingansky Reserve, ~10 km E Uril, coniferous forest ( +Pinus koraiensis +, +Abies +, +Picea +), 7.x.2009, coll. M. Babykina. Deposited in MSPU. + + + +Other material. + +Amurskaya Region, Khingansky Reserve, ~15-20 km SE Uril, oak wood litter, 8.x.2009, coll. M. Babykina. North Korea, Yanggang-do Province, ~1.5 km SE Mupho, litter under +Rhododendron +and +Alnus +, 5.vii.1985, coll. A. Szeptycki. + + + +Diagnosis. +Blind. Dorsal macrosetae (Md) present on both Th.II and Th.III. Sensillary formula incomplete (33/22224; 10/000). Medial s-setae on body tergites long, set in p-row. Ventral setae on Th.III present. Anterior side of manubrium with 3+3 setae, no unpaired axial setae present. Dens with 17-20 anterior setae, its posterior side with three setae in basal part. Mucro bidentate. + + +Description. + +Body size approximately 1.3 mm (Fig. 51). Without pigmentation. Cuticle with fine primary granulation ( +"smooth" +). Ocelli absent. PAO slender, not constricted or slightly constricted, 1.5-1.7 as long as width of Ant.I and 1.7-2.0 as long as inner unguis length. Labium complete, guard setae e7 present, three proximal and four basomedian setae. Ventral side of head with 4+4 postlabial setae. Ant.I with 16-17 common setae, two ventral s-setae (s) and three basal micro s-setae (bms): two dorsal (short and long) and one ventral. Ant.II with three bms and one latero-distal s, Ant.III with one bms and with five distal s (including one lateral), without additional s-setae. Ant.IV with stick-like organite. + + +Common setae sparse, macrosetae long (Fig. 51). Sensillary formula as 33/22224 (s), three s-setae lost: corner accp-s on Th.II, one of dorsal accp-s on Abd.IV, and as-s on Abd.V (Figs 55-56). Micro s-setae as 10/000 (ms). Tergal s-setae thin and long, lateral s-setae on abdomen shorter. Medial s-setae on Th. +II-Abd +.III situated in posterior position, on Abd. +I-III +between Md and Mdl. Abd.V with four s-setae arranged as three long and slender (accp1, accp2, accp3) and one latero-ventral, short ( +'3+1' +pattern) (Figs 52, 57), accp3 s-setae as long as accp2 (ratio accp2: accp3 = 1.0-1.2). Macrosetae smooth and very long, 2,2/3,3,3 in number, medial ones on Abd.V slightly shorter than dens (dens: Md = 1.0-1.3) and 7.3-9.3 times longer than mucro. Metathorax with 3+3 ventral setae. + + +Unguis +of normal shape, without lateral and inner teeth. Empodial appendage as long as ~0.5 of unguis. All tibiotarsi with additional setae: 28-29 on legs +I-II +and>35 on leg III. Upper and lower subcoxae of legs +I-III +with 0,1/3,7/6,8 setae, respectively. Coxae of leg I with three front setae. Tibiotarsal tenent setae pointed, few setae on dis +tal +half of tibiotarsi III slightly thickened. Ventral tube with 4+4 latero-distal and 6-7 posterior setae (4 in distal transversal row), anteriorly without setae. Tenaculum with 4+4 teeth and a seta. Anterior furcal subcoxae with 12-14, posterior one with five setae. Anterior side of manubrium with 3+3 setae (Fig. 54). Posterior side of manubrium with 5+5 latero-basal, two apical setae (ap), 2+2 setae in distal transversal row (M1, ml1), two pairs of lateral setae, and 4+4 in central part (Fig. 54). Dens with 17-20 anterior setae. Posterior side of dens crenulated and with six setae: three basal, two at the middle, and one subapical (Fig. 54). Subapical seta often hardly visible. Mucro bidentate. Ratio of manubrium: dens: mucro = 5.4-7.2: 7.8-9.3: 1. + + + +Remarks. + +Folsomia laconica +sp. n. most resembles +F. trisensilla +sp. n. but differs having three (vs four) basal setae on posterior side of dens) (Figs 54, 63-64) and fewer common setae at the end of abdomen. The latter character is expressed in 2+2 dorsal p-setae on Abd.V (vs 3+3 in +F. trisensilla +sp. n.) and 2-3 p-setae between s-setae on Abd.IV (vs 4-5) (Figs 52, 53). + + + +Figures 50-54. +F. trisensilla +sp. n. (50, 53) and +F. laconica +sp. n. (51, 52, 54) 50-51 Appearance 52-53 End of abdomen, dorsal view 54 Furca, lateral view. + + + + +Figures 55-57. +F. laconica +sp. n. 55-56 Position of macrosetae, setae of p-row, and s-setae on anterior (55) and posterior (56) half of corpus 57 End of abdomen, lateral view. + + + + +Distribution and ecology. +Known from three locations in Russian Far East and North Korea (Fig. 90). It occurs in forest litter. + + +Derivatio nominis. +The species shows the most laconic chaetotaxy of p-row on Abd.V. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/26/33/37263331E7A5B2C50B3FCA0A721328E3.xml b/data/37/26/33/37263331E7A5B2C50B3FCA0A721328E3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ccf9bf10e56 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/26/33/37263331E7A5B2C50B3FCA0A721328E3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Tribe +Anthiini Bonelli, 1813 + + + + +Anthies +Bonelli, 1813: 18 [stem: Anthi-]. Type genus: +Anthia +Weber, 1801. + + +Polyhirmi +Rousseau, 1905: 3, in key [stem: Polyhirm-]. Type genus: +Polyhirma +Chaudoir, 1850. + + +Cypholobini +G. Strohmeyer, 1928: 287 [stem: Cypholob-]. Type genus: +Cypholoba +Chaudoir, 1850. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/26/54/37265476D61451BBA66E8247FAE7D9D0.xml b/data/37/26/54/37265476D61451BBA66E8247FAE7D9D0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..04f45838dac --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/26/54/37265476D61451BBA66E8247FAE7D9D0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ + + + +Three new species and a new combination of Triblidium + + + +Author + +Lv, Tu + + + +Author + +Hou, Cheng-Lin + + + +Author + +Johnston, Peter R. + +text + + +MycoKeys + + +2019 + +60 + + +1 +15 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.60.46645 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.60.46645 +1314-4049-60-1 +8C3BB5FD62385EAC9531299547C29D71 + + + + +Triblidium hubeiense T. Lv & C. L. Hou +sp. nov. +Figs 2 +, +3 + + + +Diagnosis. + +Similar to + +Triblidium sherwoodiae + +but different by apically not swollen and unbranched paraphyses and homolateral curved ascospores, with a smaller L/W ratio of 1.4-2.3 (average ratio of 1.83) (average ratio of 2.52 for + +T. sherwoodiae + +). + + +Holotype. +On dead twigs of + +Rhododendron + +sp., CHINA, Hubei Province, Shennongjia National Nature Reserve, +31.4360 N +; +110.3014 E +, alt. ca. 2900 m, 23 July 2018, C.-L. HOU1350A (BJTC 201908). + + + +Description. + +Ascomata erumpent from the bark, circular or rectangular in outline, 1.3-2.0 mm diam., solitary or occasionally confluent, with a black (#211414) outer surface that is sculptured with polygonal areolae, opening by irregular splits to expose a yellow (#ffc14f) hymenium. In median vertical section, ascomata 500-600 +μm +thick. Covering stroma 270-300 +μm +thick near the central part of ascomata, decreasing to 65-110 +μm +at the edge, consisting of an outer layer of highly melanized hyphae with a few remnants of host tissue embedded in the surface and an inner layer of hyaline hyphae. Basal layer 65-160 +μm +thick, composed of highly melanized hyphae with hyaline hyphae towards the internal matrix of stroma that is 75-125 +μm +thick, composed of textura intricata. Subhymenium 45-75 +μm +thick consisting of small, irregular textura angularis. Excipulum absent. Paraphyses 200-230 +x +ca. 1 +μm +, filiform, multi-guttulate, guttulae visible in water and IKI but disappearing in both lactophenol solution and 5% KOH, not swollen and branched at the apex, extending past mature asci. Asci ripening sequentially, 160-200 +x +15-24 +μm +, cylindrical, thin-walled, without circumapical thickening, rounded at the apex, 6-8-spored. Ascospores 20-30 +x +12-18 +μm +, L/W ratio of 1.4-2.3 (average ratio of 1.83), ellipsoidal, often curved homolateral, hyaline, at first aseptate, becoming muriform at maturity, with 6-8 transverse septa and a few longitudinal and oblique septa, without a gelatinous sheath, inamyloid in IKI. + + + +Figure 2. + +Triblidium hubeiense + +(Holotype, BJTC 201908) on + +Rhododendron + +sp. twig +A, B +mature dried ascomata observed under dissecting microscope +C +dead ascospores in water. + + + + +Figure 3. + +Triblidium hubeiense + +(Holotype, BJTC 201908) +A +ascoma in median vertical section +B +paraphyses, mature asci with ascospores and immature ascus +C +dead ascospores in water. + + +Conidiomata and zone lines not seen. + + +Known distribution. +Known from a single collection from Shennongjia National Nature Reserve, Hubei Province, China. + + +Etymology. +Referring to the Hubei Province where the specimen was collected. + + +Comments. + + +Triblidium hubeiense + +is similar to + +T. sherwoodiae + +Magnes and + +T. carestiae + +(De Not.) Rehm, but + +T. sherwoodiae + +has paraphyses with swollen terminal cell, straight ascospores and is only found on + +Pinus ponderosa + +; + +T. carestiae + +commonly has 3-8 ascospores per ascus, ascospores usually with beak-like structure at poles, 7-14 transverse septa and apically branched paraphyses. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/26/8D/37268D76305B8662789832EF841A5DBD.xml b/data/37/26/8D/37268D76305B8662789832EF841A5DBD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7e46889b249 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/26/8D/37268D76305B8662789832EF841A5DBD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ + + + +Brazilian Trichoptera Checklist II + + + +Author + +Paprocki, Henrique + + + +Author + +Franca, Diogo + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1557 +1557 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1557 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1557 +1314-2828-2-1557 + + + + +Leptonema crassum Ulmer, 1905 + + + +Distribution +Espirito Santo, Goias, Minas Gerais, Mato Grosso, Roraima, Sao Paulo + + +Notes + +Ulmer 1905a + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/26/91/3726919A8F1A7420C53DB64A89970A81.xml b/data/37/26/91/3726919A8F1A7420C53DB64A89970A81.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fad194d6434 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/26/91/3726919A8F1A7420C53DB64A89970A81.xml @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Melastoma octandrum +, +spec. nov. + + + + +7. Melastoma foliis ovatis trinervibus glabris margine hispidis. +Fl. zeyl. 173. +* + + + + +Habitat in +India +. ♄ + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/26/D0/3726D024F3A9540EB1E83EAA875E212C.xml b/data/37/26/D0/3726D024F3A9540EB1E83EAA875E212C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a0eb95fddb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/26/D0/3726D024F3A9540EB1E83EAA875E212C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,639 @@ + + + +A revision of the Chilean water penny genus Tychepsephus Waterhouse, 1876 (Coleoptera, Psephenidae, Eubriinae), with description of a second species and two larval morphotypes, and notes on other Chilean Psephenidae + + + +Author + +Shepard, William D. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4664-2597 +Essig Museum of Entomology, University of California, 1101 Valley Life Sciences Bldg., Berkeley, CA 94720, USA + + + +Author + +Barr, Cheryl B. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-4301 +Essig Museum of Entomology, University of California, 1101 Valley Life Sciences Bldg., Berkeley, CA 94720, USA +cbarr@berkeley.edu + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2023 + +2023-05-26 + + +1164 + + +23 +61 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1164.103184 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1164.103184 +1313-2970-1164-23 +CC06E1473B074F478AFB08520503A404 +62BD8FF233655E5288FA80F56FEA3299 + + + + +Tychepsephus cekalovici +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 7 +, 8-9 +, 11 +, 18-19 +, 20 +, 21-23 + + + +Type locality. + +Chile: +Region +X (Los Lagos), 3.5 rd. km W of Nueva Braunau, Puente Colegual, +Rio +Colegual, -41.3264°, -73.1225°, 158 m, sweeping riparian vegetation, 8 January 2003, William D. Shepard leg. (Fig. +8 +). + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +male, pinned. "CHILE: Region X / 9 km E Loncotoro / 8 I 2003 650' / Pte Colegual 2 [ +Rio +Colegual] (WDS-A-1519) [on reverse] // William D. Shepard, leg. // [genitalia in vial below specimen] // HOLOTYPE / Tychepsephus / cekalovici / Shepard & Barr [red handwritten label]". Deposited in the MNNC. + + + +Other material examined. + + +Paratypes +(67). +Chile +: +Region X +, + +3 km +W Nueva Braunau + +, +Rio Colegual +, +30 XII 2002 +(WDS-A-1502) [on reverse], +William D. Shepard +, leg. (9; EMEC, 6, +5♂ +1♀ +; MNHN, +1♂ +; MNNC, +1♂ +; NHMUK, +1♂ +) + +; + +Chile +: + +Region + +X +Lagos +, + +Rio +Colegual + +3.5 rd. km W +Nueva Braunau +, elev.160' [ + +49 m + +], +41°19.58'S +, +73°07.35'W +, +30 Dec. 2002 +, +C. B. Barr +, sweeping willows and other riparian vegetation (11; EMEC, 9, +8♂ +, +1♀ +; MNNC, +1♂ +; NHMUK, +1♂ +) + +; data as above, +31 Dec. 2002 +(EMEC, +5♂ +); data as above, +8 Jan. 2003 +(14; EMEC, 10, +8♂ +2♀ +; MNHN, +2♂ +; MNNC, +1♂ +; NHMUK, +1♀ +); + +Chile +: +Region X +, + +9 km +E Loncotoro + +, +Pte. Colegual +2, 650' [ + +198 m + +], +8 I 2003 +(WDS-A-1519) [on reverse], +William D. Shepard +, leg. (10; EMEC, 6, +4♂ +2♀ +; MNHN, +1♀ +; MNNC, 2, +1♂ +1♀ +; NHMUK, +1♂ +) + +; + +Chile +: + +Region + +X +Lagos +, + +Rio +Colegual + +, 8 rd. km W +Llanquehue +, elev.700' [ + +213 m + +], +41°16.51'S +, +73°06.52'W +, +8 Jan. 2003 +, +C. B. Barr +, sweeping willows & other riparian vegetation (10; EMEC, 9, +6♂ +3♀ +; MNNC, +1♀ +) + +; + +Chile +: + +8 mi +W of Puerto Varas + +, 1-16-51, +Ross +and +Michelbacher +, CAS (CASC, 1) + +; + +Chile +: +Region X +, + +20 km +N +Chaiten + +, unnamed stream [trib. + +Rio +Blanco + +], 520' [ + +158 m + +], +3 I 2003 +(WDS-A-1511) [on reverse], +William D. Shepard +, leg. (EMEC, +1♂ +) + +; + +Chile +: +Region X +, +Rio Contaco +, 520' [ + +158 m + +], +9 I 2003 +(WDS-A-1521) [on reverse], +William D. Shepard +, leg. (EMEC, 3, +1♂ +2♀ +) + +; + +Chile +: +Corral +, +Dec 1905 +, +R. Thaxter +, MCZ (MCZC, 3) + +. + + + +Differential diagnosis. + +Males of + +T. cekalovici + +sp. nov. (Figs +18 +- +20 +) are considerably smaller (3.3-3.9 mm long) than males of + +T. felix + +(4.6-5.2 mm long); the pronotal cuticle is dark brown to black with pale lateral and basal margins, and an elongate yellow spot anterior and adjacent to the scutellar shield; the elytral cuticle is usually yellow-brown with dark markings in a zig-zag pattern, but may be mostly plain, without patterning; the depressed frontal area between the eyes has a narrow, inverted Y-shaped sulcus; and abdominal ventrite 3 has a prominent, raised, golden yellow setal patch extending the full length of the ventrite (Fig. +18b +). + + + +Figures 18, 19. + +Tychepsephus cekalovici + +sp. nov., male +18 +habitus +a +dorsal view +b +ventral view; length 3.2 mm +19 +aedeagus +a +dorsal view +b +lateral view +c +ventral view. + + + + +Figure 20. + +Tychepsephus cekalovici + +sp. nov., male dorsal habitus showing color pattern variation +a +length 3.3 mm +b +length 3.5 mm +c +length 3.5 mm. + + + +In contrast, males of + +T. felix + +(Figs +13 +, +14 +) are much larger than those of + +T. cekalovici + +sp. nov.; the pronotal cuticle is dark brown to black with pale lateral margins and no yellow discal markings; the elytral cuticle is dark brown or red-brown, with setal patterning only; the depression between the eyes does not have an inverted Y-shaped sulcus; and abdominal ventrite 3 has a median, golden yellow setal patch that is not distinctly raised and does not extend the entire length of the ventrite (Fig. +13b +). + + +The aedeagi (Figs +14 +, +19 +) of the two species are clearly different. In + +T. cekalovici + +sp. nov. (Fig. +19 +) the parameres have curved lateral margins and curved medial margins, and the apices are broad. In + +T. felix + +(Fig. +14 +), the parameres have straight lateral margins and only slightly curved medial margins, and the apices are narrow. + + +Like the males, females of + +T. cekalovici + +sp. nov. (Figs +21 +, +22 +) are much smaller (3.3-3.9 mm long) than females of + +T. felix + +(4.3-5.7 mm long), and most have elytra with transverse yellow bands in a zig-zag pattern. Individuals of + +T. cekalovici + +without elytral patterning usually may be distinguished by a mediobasal yellow or yellow-brown spot, sometimes faint, on the pronotum anterior to the scutellar shield. In contrast, females of + +T. felix + +(Fig. +15 +) have brown elytra without yellow banding, and do not have a mediobasal yellow spot on the pronotum. + + + +Description. + +Male +(Figs +18 +- +20 +). +Body +: dorsally and ventrally covered with moderately long, coarse, yellow setae and shorter, thinner, silky, black setae; cuticle with closely spaced punctures, punctures finer ventrally. Cuticle of head, pronotum and venter dark brown to black; pronotum with yellow margins; elytra usually yellow-brown with dark brown patterns. Length 3.3-3.9 mm, width 2.0-2.6 mm ( +n += 19). +Head +: covered with moderately long, yellow setae. Vertex between eyes slightly wider than diameter of an eye. Frons deflexed at 90° angle from vertex; moderately deep depression between eyes containing a narrow, inverted Y-shaped sulcus, arms of Y deeply incised. Frontoclypeal suture absent. Clypeus wider than long, narrow at base; anterolateral angles curved beneath antennal bases. Maxillary palpus with four palpomeres; palpomeres 1-3 yellow-brown; 4 dark brown, obliquely hatchet-shaped, weakly curved at apex. Labial palpus light to dark brown, with three palpomeres, palpomere 3 truncate to weakly curved; glossae and paraglossae apically bifid and acicular. Antenna weakly serrate, with 11 antennomeres; 1 longest, cylindrical, yellow; 2 half as long as 1, yellow-brown; 3-11 dark brown, each wider apically. Antennal base encircled by raised margin. Eye large, bulbous, finely faceted. +Pronotum +: a little more than twice as wide as long, widest just anterior to base; all margins yellow; anterior margin slightly sinuate, convex between anterior angles; anterior angles prominent, broadly rounded, projecting anteriorly, clasping eyes; lateral margins finely sculptured with shallow notches, margins straight to basal 1/3 then curved to posterior angles; posterior angles slightly obtuse; posterior margin crenulate, straight laterally then curved to scutellar shield, straight anterior to scutellar shield; disc convex at middle, depressed near anterior angles; disc anterior to scutellar shield with an oblong, subbasal yellow spot and a short, shallow, median sulcus. +Scutellar shield +: pentagonal, as long as wide; anterior margin crenulate; disc flat, depressed, densely covered with coarse yellow setae. +Elytra +: conjointly longer than wide, widest ~ 1/3 the distance from apices, wider than pronotum; each elytron with anterior margin crenulate; lateral margin yellow, smooth, narrowly explanate; humerus moderately prominent; elytral base depressed between humerus and scutellar shield; area adjacent to lateral margin in anterior 1/2 with a wide, moderately deep depression; disc more convex in posterior 1/2. Disc densely punctate, punctures small, separated by less than own width; setose, setae less dense near base and along suture. Cuticle variably patterned, usually yellow with transverse, zig zag bands of dark brown spots near the base and at the apical 1/3, sometimes lacking the apical band. Epipleuron widest at humeri, narrowing at abdominal ventrite 1, grooved adjacent to abdomen. +Metathoracic wings +: macropterous. +Prosternum +: wider than long; anterior margin projecting to cover mouthparts with a chin piece; prosternal process extending past procoxae, medially with weak longitudinal carina, lateral margins carinate. +Mesoventrite +: strongly transverse; mesoventral process triangular, extending beyond mesocoxae; mesoventral cavity deep to receive prosternal process. +Metaventrite +: wider than long, dark brown to black; disc flattened at midline and strongly convex laterally; deep fossa at junction of discrimen and metakatepisternal suture. +Legs +: similar, except procoxa and mesocoxa globular, metacoxa very short and transverse; femur and tibia usually darker than tarsus; tibia and tarsus long and narrow, tarsus longer than tibia; tarsus usually with dense, short, pale setae; claws short, slender. +Abdomen +: mottled yellow-brown and dark brown, densely setose; with five ventrites, 1 shortest, 5 longest; ventrites 1-3 very convex in middle; ventrite 3 with prominent, raised, oval, medial patch of dense, coarse, golden yellow setae. +Aedeagus +: (Fig. +19 +) 2.5X as long as wide; phallobase narrow basally then widening apically; parameres stout, much longer than penis and enclosing it, apices with inner margins truncate; penis much narrower than a paramere, elongate, parallel-sided, broadly rounded at apex, with broad basal apophyses. +Female +(Figs +21-23 +) larger than male and darker. Elytra red-brown or dark brown, usually patterned with several yellow, transverse, zig zag bands; less often with yellow markings only at base. Pronotum with a small, triangular, yellow or yellow-brown subbasal spot just anterior to scutellar shield, sometimes obscure. Tarsi not densely setose. Abdominal ventrite 3 lacking a prominent, raised, medial patch of golden yellow setae. +Ovipositor +: (Fig. +23 +) with baculus nearly twice as long as gonocoxite; baculus almost twice as long as wide, strap-like, wider apically; each proximal gonocoxite triangular, distal gonocoxites separate basally then converging to meet apically, apices obliquely truncate; each gonostylus long and narrow, half as long as distal gonocoxite. Very similar to that of + +T. felix + +(Fig. +16 +). + + + +Figures 21-23. + +Tychepsephus cekalovici + +sp. nov., female +21 +habitus +a +dorsal view +b +ventral view; length 4.4 mm +22 +dorsal color pattern variation; length 4.3 mm +23 +ovipositor, dorsal view. + + + + +Variation. + +Males are smaller than females: males, 3.3-3.9 mm long, 2.0-2.6 mm wide ( +n += 19); females, 4.3-4.7 mm long, 2.1-3.0 mm wide ( +n += 7). The elytral cuticle of males is yellow, yellow-brown, or brown with dark brown patterning (Figs +18 +, +20 +), while that of females is red-brown to dark brown with yellow patterning (Figs +21 +, +22 +). The pronotal yellow, oblong, subbasal spot of the males is usually yellow-brown and reduced to a triangle or less in the females. The tibiae of males are more setose than those of females. Females (Fig. +21b +) lack the prominent, raised patch of golden yellow setae on abdominal ventrite 3 that is present in males (Fig. +18b +). + + + +Egg description. + +Eggs spherical, 0.2 mm diameter ( +n += 10); flattened on one side; chorion with tiny dimples. + + + +Etymology. + +The trivial name, +cekalovici +, honors the late +Tomas +Cekalovic +, who was an outstanding coleopterist, arachnologist, and field biologist from +Concepcion +, Chile ( +Urbina Burgos 2013 +). The name is a noun in the genitive case. + + + +Geographic distribution. + + +Tychepsephus cekalovici + +sp. nov. is known only from Chile. Adults have been collected in +Region +VII (del Maule), +Region +VIII ( +Bio +Bio +) (M. Elgueta, in litt.), Region XIV (Los +Rios +), and +Region +X (Los Lagos), in both the Andean and the coastal mountain areas (Fig. +7 +). The greatest number of adults collected by the authors was at +Rio +Colegual west of Puerto Varas (Fig. +8 +). + + + +Habitat. + + +Tychepsephus cekalovici + +sp. nov. adults were found in habitats as described under the genus + +Tychepsephus + +(see above). Adults were collected by sweeping marginal vegetation along streams and small, shallow rivers during the austral summer (Figs +8 +, +9 +, +11 +). + + + +Associated dryopoid taxa. + +Elmidae +: +Larainae +: + +Hydora annectans + +, + +H. lenta + +; +Elminae +: + +Austrolimnius + +, + +Luchoelmis + +, + +Neoelmis sissicollis + +. Both + +T. cekalovici + +sp. nov. and + +T. felix + +occurred at +Rio +Colegual. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/27/16/372716F59975E6E91DD40C9F52BD460B.xml b/data/37/27/16/372716F59975E6E91DD40C9F52BD460B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..35a9208cb06 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/27/16/372716F59975E6E91DD40C9F52BD460B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + +A nomenclator of extant and fossil taxa of the Melanopsidae (Gastropoda, Cerithioidea) + + + +Author + +Neubauer, Thomas A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-9941 +Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria +thomas.neubauer@nhm-wien.ac.at + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +2016-07-05 + + +602 + + +1 +358 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 +1313-2970-602-1 +65EFA27673454AC69B78DBE7E98D6103 +FFA86D39FFE2FFF3FF8AFFEBC209FFDE +126863 + + + + +Melanopsis variegata Morelet, 1857 + + + +Original source. + +Morelet 1857 +: 33. + + + +Type locality. +"[Ad Sanctam-Mariam de Balade]" [Balade], New Caledonia. + + +Remarks. + +Brot (1879 +: 444) considered the taxon as a junior synonym of + +Melanopsis frustulum + +Morelet, 1857. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/27/3D/37273D367FDBF3C5258F9DEBD00FBA5E.xml b/data/37/27/3D/37273D367FDBF3C5258F9DEBD00FBA5E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..66194955597 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/27/3D/37273D367FDBF3C5258F9DEBD00FBA5E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ + + + +Records of larentiine moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) collected at the Station Linne in Sweden + + + +Author + +Schmidt, Olga + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +7304 +7304 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7304 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7304 +1314-2828-4-7304 + + + + + +Gandaritis pyraliata (Denis & +Schiffermueller +, 1775) + + + + +Notes +Figs 19, 20 + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/27/6F/37276F3C80CC520A908BC86BF2B847F8.xml b/data/37/27/6F/37276F3C80CC520A908BC86BF2B847F8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0a8b89cbc0e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/27/6F/37276F3C80CC520A908BC86BF2B847F8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Diversity pattern of insects from Macao based on an updated species checklist after 25 years + + + +Author + +Xian, Chunlan +School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China + + + +Author + +Leong, Chi Man +Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Beijing normal university - Hong Kong Baptist University United International College, Zhuhai, China & Macao Entomological Society, Estrada Coronel Nicolau de Mesquita, Macao SAR, China + + + +Author + +Luo, Jiuyang +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2748-9534 +School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China + + + +Author + +Jia, Fenglong +School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China + + + +Author + +Han, Hongxiang +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China +hanhx@ioz.ac.cn + + + +Author + +Xie, Qiang +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6376-8808 +School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China +xieq8@mail.sysu.edu.cn + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2024 + +2024-04-05 + + +12 + + +118110 +118110 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e118110 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e118110 +1314-2828-12-e118110 +57B0CE31B4055266A115FC1275D70C79 + + + + +Agenocimbe jucunda (Mocsary, 1896) + + + +Notes + +Pun and Batalha (1997) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/27/81/3727819C0357568294EA4F34A3ED8A51.xml b/data/37/27/81/3727819C0357568294EA4F34A3ED8A51.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e5ac0f68453 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/27/81/3727819C0357568294EA4F34A3ED8A51.xml @@ -0,0 +1,258 @@ + + + +To name but a few: descriptions of five new species of Terebellides (Annelida, Trichobranchidae) from the North East Atlantic + + + +Author + +Parapar, Julio +Departamento de Bioloxia, Universidade da Coruna, Spain +jparapar@udc.es + + + +Author + +Capa, Maria +Departament de Biologia, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain + + + +Author + +Nygren, Arne +Sjoefartmuseet Akvariet, Goeteborg, Sweden and Institutionen foer marina vetenskaper, Goeteborgs Universitet, Sweden + + + +Author + +Moreira, Juan +Departamento de Biologia (Zoologia) & Centro de Investigacion en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1374-2033 + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +992 + + +1 +58 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.992.55977 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.992.55977 +1313-2970-992-1 +0F038B5B120E45838E854092C9798566 +6F09FA35C1585CCF8F9B519ADD7C0BFA + + + + +Terebellides ronningae +sp. nov. +Figs 1 +, 2 +, 3F +, 9 +, 10 +, 14B +, 17D +, 18B +, 19B +, 20 +, 21 +, 28C +; +Table 1 +; Suppl. material 1: Table S1; Suppl. material 2: Table S2 + + + + +Species 7 - +Nygren et al. 2018 +: 18-22, figs 5, 6, 10, Suppl. material 1: Table S1. + + + +M aterial examined. + + +Type material. +Holotype + +: ZMBN116357. +Paratypes +(8 specs): Norwegian coast (ZMBN 116350, ZMBN 116352, ZMBN 116353, ZMBN 116354, ZMBN 116355, ZMBN 116356, ZMBN 116358, ZMBN 116359); Skagerrak (ZMBN 116348, ZMBN 116349). + + + +Holotype +. + +Complete specimen, 19.0 mm long and 2.0 mm width (Figs +3F +, +19B +). + + + +GenBank accession numbers of material examined (COI). + +Holotype +: MG025114; +Paratypes +: MG025105, MG025106, MG025107, MG025109, MG025110, MG025111, MG025112, MG025113, MG025115, MG025116. +Additional material +: MG025108, + + + +Diagnostic features of type material. + +Complete individuals ranging from 12.0-35.0 mm in length and 1.5-3.0 mm in width (Fig. +17D +). Branchial dorsal lobes lamellae with poorly-developed anterior papillary projections (Fig. +20C +). Ventral branchial lobes hidden (Fig. +20A +) or not (Figs +3F +, +19B +) by dorsal ones. Lateral lappets and dorsal projection ill-defined, only slightly developed on TC2 (Fig. +20A +). Geniculate chaetae acutely bent (Fig. +21A, B +) and with very low capitium. Ciliated papilla dorsal to thoracic notopodia not observed. Thoracic uncini in one row with rostrum/capitium length ratio of approximately 2: 1, and capitium with a first row of four or five (sometimes six) large-sized teeth, followed by several progressively smaller teeth (Fig. +21C-E +). Abdomen with 24-35 uncinigers with type 2 uncini (Figs +21F +, +28C +). + + + +Nucleotide diagnostic features. + +All sequences of + +T. ronningae + +sp. nov. share the unique apomorphic nucleotides in positions 129 (G), 399 (G) and 435 (G). + + + +Type locality. + +Hordaland, Lysefjord (Norway); 25-47 m deep (Figs +10 +, +18B +). + + + +Figure 18. +Geographic distribution of +A + +T. europaea + +Lavesque et al., 2019 +, +B + +T. ronningae + +sp. nov., +C + +T. norvegica + +sp. nov., +D + +T. scotica + +sp. nov. Yellow frame showing Hordaland (Fig. +10 +). + + + + +Distribution and bathymetry. + +Norwegian coast and shelf, Skagerrak; 25-188 m deep ( +Nygren et al. 2018 +) (Figs +9 +, +18B +; Suppl. material 1: Table S1). + + + +Etymology. + +This species is named after Dr. +Ann-Helen +Ronning +, Head Engineer of the Department of Technical and Scientific Conservation, Natural History Museum-NHMO (Oslo), for her help and friendship. + + + +Remarks. + + +Terebellides ronningae + +sp. nov. is characterised by the lack of ciliated papilla dorsal to thoracic notopodia and the presence of papillary projections pointing over the edge of the dorsal anterior border of branchial lamellae, thoracic uncini of type 1 and abdominal of type 2 (Table +1 +). It is distinguished from the closest relatives of subgroup A2 by the presence of thoracic uncini type 1 instead of type 3 (Table +1 +). + + +Specimens examined with SEM bear thoracic uncini with rostrum bendings (Fig. +21C +) similar to those of other NEA species (see Discussion for + +T. stroemii + +). The branchial ventral lobes show variability in their arrangement that is similar to that of + +T. europaea + +. + + +Twelve sequences (see Suppl. material 2: Table S2), in ten haplotypes, have been attributed to this species ( +Nygren et al. 2018 +). They show 0-0.6% intraspecific divergence, and a minimum of 8.8% uncorrected genetic distance, its closest relative being + +T. europaea + +(Fig. +2 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/27/F8/3727F8E707E115205CE6E67EC74F74EB.xml b/data/37/27/F8/3727F8E707E115205CE6E67EC74F74EB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7b4069a0366 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/27/F8/3727F8E707E115205CE6E67EC74F74EB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ + + + +Brazilian Trichoptera Checklist II + + + +Author + +Paprocki, Henrique + + + +Author + +Franca, Diogo + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1557 +1557 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1557 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1557 +1314-2828--1557 + + + + +Itauara amazonica (Flint), 1971 + + + +Distribution +Amazonas + + +Notes + +Flint Jr 1971 +, +Robertson and Holzenthal 2011 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/50/3728505EAF2653C3932F4FCD12AB8881.xml b/data/37/28/50/3728505EAF2653C3932F4FCD12AB8881.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f8682788545 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/50/3728505EAF2653C3932F4FCD12AB8881.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Differentiating Iconella from Surirella (Bacillariophyceae): typifying four Ehrenberg names and a preliminary checklist of the African taxa + + + +Author + +Jahn, Regine +Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Dahlem, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Koenigin-Luise-Str. 6 - 8, 14195 Berlin, Germany +r.jahn@bgbm.org + + + +Author + +Kusber, Wolf-Henning +Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Dahlem, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Koenigin-Luise-Str. 6 - 8, 14195 Berlin, Germany + + + +Author + +Cocquyt, Christine +Botanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1680, Meise, Belgium + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2017 + +2017-07-03 + + +82 + + +73 +112 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.82.13542 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.82.13542 +1314-2003-82-73 +3433E24DC048FFE06A5CFFF08905FFFB +1138117 + + + + +Iconella vasta var. linearis (Hust.) Cocquyt & R. Jahn +comb. nov. + + + + +≡ +Surirella vasta var. linearis +Hust. in Huber-Pestalozzi, Phytoplankt. +Suesswass +. vol. 2 (2), 504. 1942. + + + +Lectotype + +(cited as holotype but in fact designated by +Simonsen 1987 +). X4/9589 Lake Tanganyika "Tanganyika See. 6". + +http://phycobank.org/100090 + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/65/37286543BCBC591C8040D19DC6156D33.xml b/data/37/28/65/37286543BCBC591C8040D19DC6156D33.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a0bbefb1317 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/65/37286543BCBC591C8040D19DC6156D33.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Floristic inventory and distribution characteristics of algific talus slopes in a specific area of forest biodiversity in South Korea + + + +Author + +Lee, Jong-Won +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-8396 +Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Yun, Ho-Geun +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Hwang, Tae Young +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Kyungmin +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Jung, Se-Hoon +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +An, Jong Bin +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea +ajb8825@korea.kr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-12-18 + + +11 + + +113952 +113952 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 +1314-2828-11-e113952 +5B963235F71B550FA1E3BC1F0E590B10 + + + + +Potamogeton oxyphyllus Miq., 1867 + + + +Distribution +South Russian Far East to North Sumatra + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/6F/37286F762590375093735928B5B64AF5.xml b/data/37/28/6F/37286F762590375093735928B5B64AF5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6c86f53786d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/6F/37286F762590375093735928B5B64AF5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ + + + +Larval food plants of Australian Larentiinae (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) - a review of available data + + + +Author + +Schmidt, Olga + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +7938 +7938 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7938 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7938 +1314-2828-4-7938 + + + + + +"Chrysolarentia" severata ( +Guenee +, 1858) + + + + +Ecological interactions + +Feeds on + +Astroloma humifusum +( +Ericaceae +) + + + + +Notes + +S. Williams, pers. comm., in: +Marriott (2011) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/87/372887D0FF84FFEBFF36F8B7C5C7FA3F.xml b/data/37/28/87/372887D0FF84FFEBFF36F8B7C5C7FA3F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f12519a927e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/87/372887D0FF84FFEBFF36F8B7C5C7FA3F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,312 @@ + + + +Two new species of Simothraulopsis Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) from Roraima State, northern Brazil + + + +Author + +Boldrini, Rafael +Universidade Federal de Roraima, Campus Paricarana, Centro de Estudos da Biodiversidade (CBio), Laboratório de Entomologia, + + + +Author + +Lima, Lucas Ramos Costa +0000-0001-5943-3351 +Universidade Estadual do Piauí, Campus Heróis do Jenipapo, Laboratório de Zoologia, CEP 64.280 - 000, Campo Maior, Piauí, Brazil. https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5943 - 3351 + + + +Author + +Oliveira, Ismael Barreto De +Universidade Federal de Roraima, Campus Paricarana, Centro de Estudos da Biodiversidade (CBio), Laboratório de Entomologia, + + + +Author + +Boldrini, Bianca Maira De Paiva Ottoni +0000-0001-9442-6018 +Universidade Federal de Roraima, Colégio de Aplicação (CAp), Campus Paricarana, CEP 69.310 - 000, Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazil. https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 9442 - 6018 + + + +Author + +Salles, Frederico Falcão +0000-0001-8331-5929 +Museu de Entomologia, Depto. de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, CEP 36.570 - 900, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 8331 - 5929 + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2022 + +2022-11-25 + + +5213 + + +3 + + +279 +286 + + + +journal article +194620 +10.11646/zootaxa.5213.3.5 +88837177-192d-4578-bbfc-5609de68f952 +1175-5326 +7359987 +DF2A4E4D-CA04-4CDF-A0D8-E8B63A713825 + + + + + + + +Simothraulopsis rainori + +sp. nov. +Boldrini, Lima & Salles + + + + + + +( +Figs. 2C, D +, +3D–F +and +4C, D +) + + + + +Diagnosis. +Male imago:1)general coloration grayish brown( +Figs.2C, D +); 2) hind wing with costal projection forming a right angle, located approximately 1/2 distance from base to apex of wing ( +Figs. 3E, F +); 3) telopenis spine-like, mid sized (less than the half of total length of penis lobes), and ventrally directed with apex bent outward ( +Figs. 4C, D +); 5) penis lobes fused in their basal 1/3, with a well-marked sclerotized region; each lobe laterally swollen and protruding on the inner margin ( +Fig. 4D +). + + + + +FIGURE 2A–D. +Habitus of male imago. A, B) + +Simothraulopsis pacaraima + + +sp. nov. + +: A) lateral view; B) dorsal view. C, D) + +Simothraulopsis rainori + + +sp. nov +. + +: C) lateral view; D) dorsal view. + + + + +FIGURE 3A–F. +Wings. A–C) + +Simothraulopsis pacaraima + + +sp. nov. + +: A) forewing; B) hind wing (enlarged); C) hind wing. D–F) + +Simothraulopsis rainori + + +sp. nov. + +: D) forewing; E) hind wing (enlarged); F) hind wing. + + + + +FIGURE 4A–D. +Male genitalia. A, B) + +Simothraulopsis pacaraima + + +sp. nov. + +: A) ventral view; B) penis (enlarged). C, D) + +Simothraulopsis rainori + + +sp. nov. + +: C) ventral view; D) penis (enlarged). + + + + +Description + + +Male imago + + +LENGTH: body: +3.9–4.7 mm +; forewing: +4.7–4.9 mm +; hind wing: +0.6 mm +. + + +HEAD. Dorsal region dark brown, with black marks; ventral region light brown. Upper portion of compound eyes reddish brown, lower portion black ( +Fig. 2C +). Scape and pedicel yellowish translucent, flagellum whitish translucent. + + +THORAX. Pronotum dark brown; with medial and lateral black stripes. Mesonotum dark brown; longitudinal medial, anterolateral scutal, lateroparapsidal and medioparapsidal sutures light brown; posterior scutal protuberance, scuto-scutellar impression and scutellum dark brown. Pleura brown, washed with dark brown; membranous area yellowish. Metanotum dark brown ( +Figs. 2C, D +). Sterna light brown, sutures darker. Wings membrane hyaline. Forewing with longitudinal veins light brown and cross veins translucent; costal brace and base of veins C, Sc and anal section dark brown; fork of vein MP slightly asymmetric ( +Fig. 3D +). Hind wing with costal projection developed, forming right angle, located approximately 1/2 distance from base to apex of wing ( +Figs. 3E, F +); longitudinal and cross veins yellowish brown, except basal part of costal and subcostal vein; distal lower portion of hind wing black ( +Fig. 3E +). Coxae and trochanters brown. Leg. I: femur light brown with blackish line on ventral margin; tibia whitish, with blackish basal band; tarsi whitish. Legs II and III similar to leg I, except tibia brownish and tarsi yellowish. + + +ABDOMEN.Terga grayish brown ( +Fig. 2D +). Terga I, VIII–IX completely grayish brown; terga II–VII with anterior and anterolateral margins whitish; tergum X brown ( +Figs. 2C, D +). Sterna whitish translucent; sterna IV–VII with lateral area brownish; sterna VIII–X brown. Genitalia ( +Figs. 4C, D +). Styliger plate brown. Forceps segment I darkish brown, segments II and III lighter. Segment II 0.15x length of segment I and 1.0x length of segment III. Penis lobes yellowish, fused in their basal 1/3; each lobe rounded apically, separated by distance smaller than width of one penis lobe, with ventral spine-like telopenis, mid-sized (approximately half of the total length of penis lobes), ventrally directed with apex bent outward; ventral region of penis lobes with well-marked sclerotized region; each lobe laterally swollen and protruding on inner margin ( +Fig. 4D +). + + +Female and immature stages +. Unknown. + + + + +Etymology. +The new species is named in honor of Rainor Abensour de Souza (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade) who helped during the collection of the +type +specimens. + + + + +Material examined. + + +Holotype +: + +BRAZIL +♂ +; +ROraima +,AltO AlEgrE, FlOrEsta +NaciOnal DE +ROraima +, +RiO Mucajaí +; +02°56´18.05″N +/ +61°37´27.28″ W +; + +20.XII.2017 + +– + +05.I.2018 + +, +MalaisE trap +., BOlDrini, +R +. cOl + +. + +Paratype +: + +♂ +, SamE Data as +holotype +. + + + + +Discussion. + +Simothraulopsis rainori + + +sp. nov. + +has morphological similarities with + +S. demerara + +and + +S. sabalo + +, sharing characteristics such as the shape of the penis lobes and having a mid-sized, spine-like telopenis on penis lobes. Imagos of + +S. rainori + + +sp. nov. + +, however, can be distinguished from them by the abdominal terga color (terga II–VII with anterior and anterolateral margins whitish in + +S. pacaraima + +, and terga II–V with anterior and anterolateral margins whitish + +S. inequalis + +), and by the spine-like telopenis being ventrally directed with apex bent outward (anteriorly projected in other two species), ventral region of penis lobes with a well-marked sclerotized region and laterally swollen and protruding on the inner margin. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/87/372887D0FF84FFEFFF36FF5BC60AF91E.xml b/data/37/28/87/372887D0FF84FFEFFF36FF5BC60AF91E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f0ddf822a82 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/87/372887D0FF84FFEFFF36FF5BC60AF91E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ + + + +Two new species of Simothraulopsis Demoulin, 1966 (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) from Roraima State, northern Brazil + + + +Author + +Boldrini, Rafael +Universidade Federal de Roraima, Campus Paricarana, Centro de Estudos da Biodiversidade (CBio), Laboratório de Entomologia, + + + +Author + +Lima, Lucas Ramos Costa +0000-0001-5943-3351 +Universidade Estadual do Piauí, Campus Heróis do Jenipapo, Laboratório de Zoologia, CEP 64.280 - 000, Campo Maior, Piauí, Brazil. https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5943 - 3351 + + + +Author + +Oliveira, Ismael Barreto De +Universidade Federal de Roraima, Campus Paricarana, Centro de Estudos da Biodiversidade (CBio), Laboratório de Entomologia, + + + +Author + +Boldrini, Bianca Maira De Paiva Ottoni +0000-0001-9442-6018 +Universidade Federal de Roraima, Colégio de Aplicação (CAp), Campus Paricarana, CEP 69.310 - 000, Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazil. https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 9442 - 6018 + + + +Author + +Salles, Frederico Falcão +0000-0001-8331-5929 +Museu de Entomologia, Depto. de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, CEP 36.570 - 900, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 8331 - 5929 + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2022 + +2022-11-25 + + +5213 + + +3 + + +279 +286 + + + +journal article +194620 +10.11646/zootaxa.5213.3.5 +88837177-192d-4578-bbfc-5609de68f952 +1175-5326 +7359987 +DF2A4E4D-CA04-4CDF-A0D8-E8B63A713825 + + + + + + + +Simothraulopsis pacaraima + +sp. nov. +Boldrini, Lima & Salles + + + + + + +( +Figs. 2A, B +; +3A–C +and +4A, B +) + + + + +Diagnosis. +Male imago: 1) general coloration orangish brown ( +Figs. 2A, B +); 2) hind wing with costal projection forming a right angle, located approximately 2/3 distance from base to apex of wing ( +Figs. 3B, C +); 3) penis projection spine-like, short (less than the half of total length of penis lobes), slightly directed laterally ( +Figs. 4A, B +); 5) penis lobes with a medial knob between them ( +Fig. 4B +). + + + + +Description + + +Male imago + + +LENGTH: body: +6.2 mm +; forewing: 6.0 mm; hind wing: +0.9 mm +. + + +HEAD. Dorsal region dark brown, with black marks; ventral region brown. Upper portion of compound eyes reddish, lower portion black ( +Fig. 2A +). Scape and pedicel brown, flagellum whitish brown. + + +THORAX. Pronotum dark brown, washed with black on posterior margin. Mesonotum light brown; longitudinal medial, anterolateral scutal, lateroparapsidal and medioparapsidal sutures light brown; posterior scutal protuberance, scuto-scutellar impression and scutellum dark brown. Pleura light brown washed with dark brown; membranous area yellowish. Metanotum brown, washed with black on posterior margin ( +Figs. 2A, B +). Sterna light brown, sutures dark brown. Wings membrane hyaline. Forewing with longitudinal veins whitish yellow and cross veins translucent; costal brace and base of veins C, Sc and anal section dark brown; fork of vein MP slightly asymmetric ( +Fig. 3A +). Hind wing with costal projection developed, forming right angle located approximately 2/3 distance from base to apex of wing ( +Figs. 3B, C +); longitudinal and cross veins yellowish brown; base of costal region and almost entire lower portion of hind wing black; costal region translucent ( +Fig. 3C +). Legs: Coxae and trochanters yellowish brown; femur light brown with blackish line on ventral margin; tibia basally light brown, remainder whitish; tarsi whitish. + + +ABDOMEN. Terga orangish brown ( +Fig. 2B +). Terga I, VIII–IX completely light brown, except tergum I washed with black; terga II–VII with anterior and lateral margins whitish; terga VIII–X with black triangular area medially ( +Fig. 2B +). Sterna light brown. Genitalia ( +Figs. 4A, B +). Styliger plate dark brown. Forceps segment I yellowish brown, segments II and III lighter; basal region of segment I with small concavity. Segment II 0.09 length of segment I, 0.96 length of segment III. Penis lobes whitish, fused on basal half, each lobe rounded apically, separated by distance greater than width of one penis lobe, with spine-like, short (less than the half of total length of penis lobes) telopenis slightly laterally directed; ventral region of penis lobes with well-marked sclerotized region; inner margins of lobes divergent, with medial knob between them ( +Fig. 4B +). + + +Female and immature stages +. Unknown. + + +Etymology. +After Pacaraima, the municipality where this species was collected. + + +Material examined. + + +Holotype + +: +BRAZIL +, +♂ +imagO; +ROraima +, +Pacaraima +, +RiO Surumu +; +04°15´08.63″N +, +61°01´50.75″ W +; alt. + +168 m + +; + +11.X.2015 + +; BOlDrini, R. BarrOsO, P.C.S. SantOs, G.C.; light shEEt; +UFRR +. + + + +Discussion. + +Simothraulopsis pacaraima + + +sp. nov. + +has morphological similarities with + +S. inequalis + +Nascimento, Salles & Hamada, +2017 + + +in the male genitalia. In both species the penis projection is lanceolate, narrowing towards apex, short (less than the half of total length of penis lobes) and laterally directed. Besides, the ventral aspect of the penis lobes has a well-marked sclerotized region. However, both species can be distinguished by features of the distal margin of the hind wing (truncated in + +S. inequalis + +and rounded in the new species), by the abdominal terga color (orangish in the both species, but, terga VIII–X with a black triangular area medially in + +S. pacaraima + +, and tergum X with a black band in + +S. inequalis + +), and by the presence of a medial knob between the penis lobes of this new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/87/372887D33E604A31EEF0FB6CAA20FEAB.xml b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E604A31EEF0FB6CAA20FEAB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..05458f16878 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E604A31EEF0FB6CAA20FEAB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,282 @@ + + + +Gibbalaria: A new genus of Olethreutini from the Afrotropical Region (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae), and a new combination in Cosmopoda Diakonoff + + + +Author + +Brown, John W. +0000-0001-5610-9855 +Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA. tortricidae. jwb @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5610 - 9855 +tortricidae.jwb@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Aarvik, Leif +Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1172 Blindern NO- 0318 Oslo, Norway. + + + +Author + +Timm, Alicia +Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2023 + +2023-04-05 + + +5263 + + +2 + + +217 +239 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 +1175-5326 +7801028 +2B1317DB-B3DE-47DF-9DE9-D884A884ECC3 + + + + + + + +Gibbalaria occidentana +Brown and Aarvik + +, +new species + + + + + + +Figs 6, 7 +, +19 +, +31 + + + + +Diagnosis +. + +Gibbalaria occidentana + +has about the same forewing length as + +G. divergana + +, and is slightly smaller and darker than + +G. chiloanei + +. The male genitalia of + +G. occidentana + +can be distinguished from those of + +G. chiloanei + +by the size of the rounded-triangular flange at base of cucullus (distal end of sacculus), which is broader in + +G. occidentana + +, and the configuration of the associated patch of long setae at the base of the flange, which extends beyond the width of the short flange in + +G. chiloanei + +but does not extending beyond the width of the flange in + +G. occidentana + +. The female genitalia of + +G. occidentana + +are very similar to those of + +G. divergana + +and + +G. chiloanei + +, but the signum lacks the small tooth present in + +G. divergana + +, and the lobe-like diverticulum of the ductus bursae is more square than round and lobe-like. + + + + +Description +. Head: As described for genus. Thorax: As described for genus; forewing length 7.0 mm (n = 2); male hindwing lacking patch of secondary scales on ventral surface. Abdomen: Male genitalia ( +Fig. 19 +) with uncus distinctly differentiated from top of tegumen, slightly narrowed subbasally to about 0.75 its distal width, with apical portion bearing a few long, fine setae from venter; top of tegumen somewhat rounded; socii ill defined, fused to margin of tegumen; valva broad basally, abruptly narrowed at middle, distal 0.5 nearly uniform in width, somewhat long-rectangular, rounded apically; costa of valva with distinct subtriangular basal process bearing three slender spines; rounded-triangular flange at base of cucullus (distal end of sacculus) bearing one large socketed spine and patch of long, fine, copper-colored setae, with patch confined to valva immediately adjacent flange; second patch of similar setae midway between base and termination of sacculus; phallus as described for genus, vesica with two thorn-like, non-deciduous cornuti. Female genitalia ( +Fig. 31 +) as described for genus; sterigma a semicircular shieldlike plate, antrum with nearly straight posterior edge (= ostium), bifurcate anteriorly; ductus bursae membranous, about as long as corpus bursae, with characteristic small diverticulum immediately anterad of antrum on left side; corpus bursae rounded-oblong; signum a small, coarsely reticulated area with a very shallow pocket; anterior end of corpus bursae narrowed, rounded-triangular. + + +DNA barcodes +. Neither the +holotype +nor +paratype +yielded DNA sequence data. + + +Types. + +Holotype +♁, +South Africa +, +Western Cape Province +, above +Brackenhill Falls +, + +9 km +E Knysna + +, + +175 m + +, eucalyptus litter, + +16 Mar 1978 + +, +M. Davis +, +USNM +slide 145,608 ( +USNM +). + + + + +FIGURES 3‒10. +Adults of + +Gibbalaria + +. 3. + +G. divergana + +holotype female; 4. + +G. chiloanei + +holotype male; 5. + +G. occidentana + +paratype female; 6. + +G. occidentana + +holotype male; 7. + +G. occidentana + +paratype female; 8. + +G. longiphallus + +holotype male; 9. + +G. mabalingwae + +holotype male; 10. + +G. scabellana + +male, South Africa. + + + + +Paratype +( +1♀ +). +South Africa +: +Western Cape Province +: +Brackenhill Falls +, + +9 km +E Knysna + +, + +175 m + +, eucalyptus litter, + +15–16 Mar 1978 + +, +D. & M. Davis +& +B. Akerbergs +, +USNM + +slide 145,620 (USNM). + + + + +Distribution +. This species is known only from near Knysna at the eastern edge of the +Western Cape Province +of +South Africa +, at an elevation of +175 m +, the lowest elevation records from the genus. Specimens were collected in March (n = 2). + + + + +Etymology +. The Latin “occidentalis” means west, and refers to the western distribution of this species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/87/372887D33E604A33EEF0FF08AE30FB6C.xml b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E604A33EEF0FF08AE30FB6C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e0835e310ea --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E604A33EEF0FF08AE30FB6C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,211 @@ + + + +Gibbalaria: A new genus of Olethreutini from the Afrotropical Region (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae), and a new combination in Cosmopoda Diakonoff + + + +Author + +Brown, John W. +0000-0001-5610-9855 +Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA. tortricidae. jwb @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5610 - 9855 +tortricidae.jwb@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Aarvik, Leif +Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1172 Blindern NO- 0318 Oslo, Norway. + + + +Author + +Timm, Alicia +Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2023 + +2023-04-05 + + +5263 + + +2 + + +217 +239 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 +1175-5326 +7801028 +2B1317DB-B3DE-47DF-9DE9-D884A884ECC3 + + + + + + + +Gibbalaria divergana +Brown and Aarvik + +, +new species + + + + + + +Figs 3 +, +30 + + + + +Diagnosis +. + +Gibbalaria divergana + +is superficially most similar to + +G. occidentana + +; unfortunately, the male of + +G. divergana + +is unknown. + +Gibbalaria divergana + +has about the same forewing length as + +G. occidentana + +, and is slightly smaller than + +G. chiloanei + +, but this is based on exceedingly few specimens. + +Gibbalaria divergana + +appears to have a slightly darker forewing pattern, with a well-defined, sub-rectangular bar extending from mid-termen that represents the remnant of the post-median fascia, and darker markings in general. In the female genitalia, the antrum of + +G. divergana + +is slightly shorter than that of + +G. occidentana + +and + +G. chiloanei + +, and the diverticulum at the posterior end of the ductus bursae is small and lobe-like. DNA barcodes provide additional evidence that is it distinct from those two species ( +Figs 1 +, +2 +). + + + + +Description. +Male unknown. Female. Head: As described for genus. Thorax: As described for genus; with distinct metathoracic tuft with distal scales slightly metallic bluish; forewing length 7.0 mm (n = 1); forewing with a series of ill-defined, parallel, outwardly oblique fascia, starting at about mid-costa, basal-most brown, followed by narrow silver-gray, then pale brown, then silver-gray, with a distinct, sub-rectangular, dark brown bar near midtornus ( +Fig. 3 +). Abdomen: Genitalia ( +Fig. 30 +) as described for genus; sterigma a short, semicircular, shield-like plate, antrum with posterior edge (= ostium) nearly straight, weakly bilobed anteriorly, slightly shorter than that of congeners; ductus bursae membranous, about as long as corpus bursae, with characteristic small diverticulum immediately anterad of antrum on left side; corpus bursae rounded-oblong; signum a small, coarsely reticulated area with a very shallow pocket with a single long tooth; anterior end of corpus bursae with a tiny lobe-like extension. + + +DNA barcodes. + +The DNA barcode from the +holotype +is joined by a specimen from +BOLD +to form a BIN ( +BOLD +: +ACN9260 +) that is 3.37% different from its nearest neighbor + +. + + +Types. + +Holotype +♀ +, +South Africa +, +Eastern Cape +Makhanda +[Grahamstown], + +550 m + +, +30.3106°S +, +26.5256°E +, + +12 Nov 2013 + +, +J. Brown +( +USNM +), +USNM +slide 145,609. [Grahamstown has officially been renamed Makhanda, and the latter name is used throughout the manuscript.] + + + + + +Distribution +. This species is known only from +one specimen +from Makhanda, +Eastern Cape Province +, and one from The Crags, +Western Cape Province +, +South Africa +. The +holotype +was collected in March. + + + + +Etymology +. The specific epithet refers to the slightly divergent appearance of the species, with a rather bold forewing pattern. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/87/372887D33E634A30EEF0FF08AED0F9C7.xml b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E634A30EEF0FF08AED0F9C7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..32365f474b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E634A30EEF0FF08AED0F9C7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ + + + +Gibbalaria: A new genus of Olethreutini from the Afrotropical Region (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae), and a new combination in Cosmopoda Diakonoff + + + +Author + +Brown, John W. +0000-0001-5610-9855 +Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA. tortricidae. jwb @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5610 - 9855 +tortricidae.jwb@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Aarvik, Leif +Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1172 Blindern NO- 0318 Oslo, Norway. + + + +Author + +Timm, Alicia +Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2023 + +2023-04-05 + + +5263 + + +2 + + +217 +239 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 +1175-5326 +7801028 +2B1317DB-B3DE-47DF-9DE9-D884A884ECC3 + + + + + + + +Gibbalaria chiloanei +Brown and Aarvik + +, +new species + + + + + + +Figs 4 +, +20, 21 +, +32 + + + + +Diagnosis +. Superficially, + +G. chiloanei + +has a slightly greater forewing than + +G. divergana + +and + +G. occidentana + +, and the forewing pattern includes a pair of pale markings in the distal 0.3 that are more pronounced (i.e., in greater contrast to the ground color) than in those species. The male genitalia of + +G. chiloanei + +are extremely similar to those of + +G. occidentana + +, but they can be distinguished from those of the latter by the length of the valva (longer in + +G. chiloanei + +), the size of the rectangular flange at the base of the cucullus (narrower in + +G. chiloanei + +), and the configuration of the associated patch of long setae at the base of the flange (extending beyond the width of the flange in + +G. chiloanei + +, not extending beyond the flange in + +G. occidentana + +). + + +The genitalia of the +two males +included under this species ( +Figs 20, 21 +) have many subtle differences, enough that based on morphology alone, we initially considered them to represent different species. However, DNA barcodes convincingly place them as conspecifics. Whether morphological differences actually represent individual variation, or the DNA barcodes are misleading, can be determined only with additional material. + + + + +Description +. Head: As described for genus. Thorax: As described for genus. Forewing length 7.5–8.0 mm (mean = +7.7 mm +; n = 4); forewing pattern as in + +G. divergana + +but less defined ( +Fig. 4 +); male hindwing lacking patch of secondary scales on ventral surface. Abdomen: Male genitalia ( +Figs 20, 21 +) with uncus distinctly differentiated from top of tegumen, slightly narrowed subbasally to about 0.75 its distal width, with apical portion bearing a few long, fine setae from venter; top of tegumen somewhat rounded; socii ill defined, fused to margin of tegumen; valva broad basally, abruptly narrowed at middle, distal 0.6 nearly uniform in width, somewhat long-rectangular, rounded apically; costa of valva with triangular basal process bearing three slender spines; rectangular flange at base of cucullus (distal end of sacculus) bearing one large socketed spine and patch of long, fine, copper-colored setae, with patch extending basad beyond the width of the flange; second patch of finer setae midway between base and termination of sacculus; phallus as described for genus, vesica with two large, thorn-like, non-deciduous cornuti. Female genitalia ( +Fig. 32 +) as described for genus; sterigma a semicircular shield-like plate, antrum with nearly straight posterior edge (= ostium), bifurcate anteriorly; ductus bursae membranous, about as long as corpus bursae, with characteristic small diverticulum immediately anterad of antrum on left side; corpus bursae rounded-oblong; signum a small, coarsely reticulated area with a very shallow pocket; anterior end of corpus bursae attenuate. + + +DNA barcodes +. + +DNA barcodes of the +holotype +and +three paratypes +form a distinct BIN ( +BOLD +: +AAY9224 +) separated from its nearest neighbor, + +G. divergana + +, by a difference of 3.37 + +% + + +Types. + +Holotype +♁, +South Africa +, +Eastern Cape +, +Makhanda +(Grahamstown), +Rhodes University +botanical garden, ca. + +580 m + +, +-33.33136 +, +26.5163 +, + +6 Mar 2014 + +, +Timm +, +Chiloane +& +Lancaster +( +USNM +), +USNM +slide 145,619. + + + + +Paratypes +(1♁, +3♀ +). +South Africa +: +Eastern Cape Province +: +Makhanda +[Grahamstown], + +18 Aug 2014 + +(1♁), D. +V +. +Chiloane +( +USNM +), +USNM +slide 145,615; + +2 Sep 2014 + +( +1♀ +), + +3 Sep 2014 + +(1♁, +1♀ +), D. +V +. Chiloane ( +USNM +), +USNM +slide 145,797 + +. + + + + +Distribution +. This species is known only from Makhanda in the +Eastern Cape Province +of +South Africa +. Specimens were collected in March (n = 1), late August (n = 1), September (n = 3), likely represented two broods. + + + + +Etymology +. The species name is a patronym for D. Chiloane, who played a role in the collection of all the specimens of this species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/87/372887D33E634A36EEF0F9C4ABDFF817.xml b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E634A36EEF0F9C4ABDFF817.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..21743353c19 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E634A36EEF0F9C4ABDFF817.xml @@ -0,0 +1,911 @@ + + + +Gibbalaria: A new genus of Olethreutini from the Afrotropical Region (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae), and a new combination in Cosmopoda Diakonoff + + + +Author + +Brown, John W. +0000-0001-5610-9855 +Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA. tortricidae. jwb @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5610 - 9855 +tortricidae.jwb@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Aarvik, Leif +Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1172 Blindern NO- 0318 Oslo, Norway. + + + +Author + +Timm, Alicia +Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2023 + +2023-04-05 + + +5263 + + +2 + + +217 +239 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 +1175-5326 +7801028 +2B1317DB-B3DE-47DF-9DE9-D884A884ECC3 + + + + + + + +Gibbalaria scabellana +(Zeller) + +, +new combination + + + + + + +Figs 10 +, +11, 16 +, +22, 23 +, +33, 34 + + + + + +Sericoris scabellana +Zeller, 1852: 81 + +; Diakonoff 1957: 72. + + + + +Afroploce scabellana +(Zeller) + +: + +Aarvik 2019: 324 + +. + + + + + + +Argyroploce sistrata +Meyrick, 1911: 228 + + +; + +Clarke 1955: 287 + +, +new synonymy +. + + + + + + +Olethreutes sistrata +: +Clarke 1958: 548 + + +. + + + + + + +Celypha sistrata +: +Diakonoff 1973: 498 + + +; Brown 2005: 168. + + + + + +Diagnosis +.As currently defined (see Remarks below), + +Gibbalaria scabellana + +is superficially nearly indistinguishable from other species of + +Gibbalaria + +, except for the species that lack the dark scale patch on the undersurface of the hindwing ( + +D. occidentana + +and + +G. chiloanei + +). Its male genitalia can be distinguished from those of + +G. longiphallus + +by the shorter and more truncate phallus, and from those of + +G. mabalingwae + +by the presence of a short-triangular uncus. From + +G. bagamoyo + +it differs in the location of the patch of spiniform setae basal to the flange of the sacculus, and from + +G. analcis + +it differs by a more constricted (i.e., less rounded) tegumen. + + + + +Redescription +. Head: Brown; posterior half of labial palpus black. Thorax: Brown-gray, tegula brown proximally. Forewing length +7.5–8.5 mm +; forewing ground color mottled with brown and gray, slightly tinged with pinkish subterminally, grayish near costa, with some faint refractive bluish spots, suffusions and spots brownish and blackish. Fringe gray, blackish terminally. Hindwing pale brownish gray above; fringe cream; male under side with irregularly ovoid patch of brownish gray secondary scales near middle of wing; hindwing conspicuously darker brown in female. Abdomen: Male genitalia ( +Figs 22, 23 +) with uncus short-triangular; socii fused to tegumen; valva broad to middle with short, small hairy lobe at basal edge of basal cavity; sacculus terminating in rounded flange, with long group of dense setae (Spc +1 +) above ventral edge, two stout spines at base of cucullus; cucullus moderately uniform in width, slightly narrowing postmedially; phallus moderately broad, short; vesica with five to seven cornuti, one with a larger base. Female genitalia ( +Figs 33, 34 +) with sclerite surrounding ostium bursae large, postostial sterigma fairly long with slender lateroterminal lobes; antrum mostly sclerotized with variably developed mediolateral diverticulum; signum with single proximal lobe. + + +DNA barcodes +. + +Ten +specimens of this species in +BOLD +form a BIN ( +BOLD +: +ABW0591 +) with an average difference of 0.21% among the samples. +Three +specimens from +Makhanda +[Grahamstown], +Eastern Cape +, +South Africa +(listed below) form a separate BIN ( +BOLD +: +ADE2779 +). +Because +we are unable to find convincing morphological characters to separate specimens of the two BINs, we tentatively assign all to + +G. scabellana + +. +In +the trees ( +Figs 1 +, +2 +) the +three specimens +from Makhanda are listed as “ + +scabellana + +.” + + + +Types. + +Holotype +♀ +( + +scabellana + +), +South Africa +, +Kaffraria +( +NHRS +). + + + + +Lectotype +♁ ( + +sistrata + +), +South Africa +, +Natal +, +Pinetown +, + +Jan 1909 + +, G.S. #9404 ( +NHMUK +) + +. + +Paralectotypes +( + +sistrata + +), +South Africa +, +Transvaal, A.I.D. +, +Barberton +, + +18 Jan 1911 + +( +1♀ +), G.S. #6625 ( +NHMUK +), +Transvaal, C.I.S. +, Zoutpansberg, + +13 Dec 1909 + +(1♁), G.S. #6624 ( +NHMUK +) + +. + + +Additional material examined +(24♁, +6♀ +). + +South Africa +: +Eastern Cape +: +Makhanda +[Grahamstown], +33.304°S +, +26.528°E +, + +10‒12 Feb 2015 + +(2♁, +1♀ +), +J. Brown +& +A. Timm +, +USNM +slides 145,603 (♁), 145,652 ( +♀ +) ( +USNM +) + +. + +Eastern +Free State +: +Modderpoort +, 1818 + +Dec 1927 + +( +1♀ +), A. J. +T +. +Janse +( +DMP +) + +. + +Gauteng +: +Hekpoort +, +Mogale’s Gate Biodiversity Center +, +-25.9492 +, +27.6567 +, + +1500 m + +, + +15 Feb 2012 + +(3♁), +P. Hebert +& +J. DeWaard +( +UOG +) + +; + +25.9492 +, +27.6267 +, + +1660 m + +, + +16 Feb 2012 + +( +1♀ +), +P. Hebert +& J. +DeWaard +( +UOG +) + +; + +nr. +Bush Camp +, +-25.9383 +, +27.6389 +, + +1420 m + +, + +14 Feb 2012 + +(1♁), +P. Hebert +& +J. DeWaard +( +UOG +) + +. + +3 air km +SE Hekpoort +, + +1361 m + +, + +7 Feb 2015 + +(1♁), +Gilligan +, +Brown +& +Staude +( +TGC +) + +. + +Magaliesburg Nature Reserve +, Steynshoop +Mountain Lodge +, + +1526 m + +, + +6‒8 Feb 2015 + +(15♁, +5♀ +), +T +. +Gilligan +( +TGC +) + +. + +Mogale’s Gate Natural Reserve +, site #2, riparian woods, +-25.9642 +, +27.6348 +, + +31 Jan 2015 + +(1♁), +J. Brown +& +T +. +Gilligan +( +USNM +) + +. + +Magaliesburg +, +Golden Valley +, +Highveld +grassland, + +1538 m + +, + +20‒21 Nov 2015 + +(2♁), +T +. +Gilligan +& +H. Staude +( +TGC +) + +. + +Heidelberg +, + +10 Dec 1915 + +(1♁), A. J. +T +. +Janse +( +DMP +) + +. + +Pretoria +, + +17 Nov 1913 + +(1♁), A. J. +T +. +Janse +( +DMP +) + +. + +Limpopo +: +Shiluvane +, + +Nov 1902 + +( +1♀ +), +Junod +( +DMP +) + +. + +Northern Cape +: +Three Sisters + +5 Mar 1911 + +(1♁), + +8 Mar 1911 + +(1♁), + +23 Feb 1911 + +(1♁), + +13 Mar 1911 + +(1♁), A. J. +T +. +Janse +(2 +DMP +, 2 +AMNH +). +Rooiplaat +, + +18 Feb 1923 + +(1♁), +C. J. Swierstra +( +DMP +) + +. + +Mpumalanga +: +Blyde River +, +Forever Resort +, +23°34’S +, +30°46’E +, + +1180 m + +, + +20‒21 Nov 2016 + +(3♁), G, +Bassi +( +GBC +) + +. + +Transvaal +: + +5 mi +WE Warmbad + +, + +24‒25 Feb 1968 + +(1♁, +1♀ +), +Krombein +& +Spangler +, male slide 144,616 ( +USNM +) + +. + +Woodbush Village +, + +13 Dec 2009 + +(1♁), +C. J. Swierstra +( +DMP +) + +. + +Waterval-Boven +, + +28‒29 Oct 2002 + +(4♁, +1♀ +), H.W. v.d, +Wolf +, +NHMO +slide 4112 +NHMO +(1♁) and 4113 ( +1♀ +) ( +NHMO +) + +. + +KwaZulu-Natal +: ca. + +3 km +S Rietvlei + +, +Blackheath Farm +, + +1375 m + +, + +20–25 Feb 1978 + +(1♁), +D. & M. Davis +& +B. Akerbergs +, +USNM +slide 144,873 ( +USNM +) + +. + +Sarnia +, + +Nov 1919 + +(1♁), +A. Janse +( +DMP +) + +. + +Western Cape +: C.P., +Wilderness +, + +12‒13 Mar 1968 + +(1♁), +P. Spangler +( +USNM +) + +. + +Unknown Province +: +Minastone + +16–25 Feb 1919 + +(1♁), +H. G. Bryer +( +DMP +) + +. + +Malta +, +Ptbg. +, + +1 Feb 1927 + +(1♁), +G. v. Son +( +DMP +) + +. + + + + +Distribution +. As presented circumscribed, this species is widely distributed throughout +South Africa +, from sea level to about +1660 m +elevation. Nothing is known of the life history. + + + + +Remarks +. + +Sericoris scabellana + +was described from a single female; the genitalia were illustrated by Diakonoff (1957). The male genitalia of the +lectotype +of + +Argyroploce sistrata + +were illustrated by +Clarke (1958: 548) +. Both male and female genitalia of + +G. scabellana + +present a rather baffling array of variation, even though subtle, and indicate that additional cryptic species may be involved. This assumption is supported by results from DNA-barcoding ( +Figs 1 +, +2 +). + + + +FIGURES 19‒24. +Male genitalia of + +Gibbalaria + +. 19. + +G. occidentana +, USNM + +slide 145,608; 20. + +G. chiloanei +, USNM + +slide 145,619 (HT); 21. + +G. chiloanei +, USNM + +slide 145,615 (PT); 22. + +G. scabellana +, USNM + +slide 144,616; 23. + +G. scabellana +, USNM + +slide 145,603; 24. + +G. longiphallus +, Bassi + +slide 6441(HT). + + + +Aarvik (2019) +synonymized + +G. mabalingwae + +with + +G. scabellana + +, but in the present study based on additional material from +South Africa +, that synonymy probably was incorrect; hence, we reinstate + +G. mabalingwae + +as a valid species. Study of the +type +material of + +Argyroploce sistrata + +in NHMUK shows that this species falls within our concept of + +G. scabellana + +. To add further confusion, DNA barcodes indicate that +three specimens +from Makhanda, +South Africa +form a distinct cluster outside of + +scabellana + +. However, because we are unable to separate these from typical + +scabellana + +based on morphology, we include them in our broad concept of + +scabellana + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/87/372887D33E664A35EEF0FC30ABE3F844.xml b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E664A35EEF0FC30ABE3F844.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..adba521529e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E664A35EEF0FC30ABE3F844.xml @@ -0,0 +1,304 @@ + + + +Gibbalaria: A new genus of Olethreutini from the Afrotropical Region (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae), and a new combination in Cosmopoda Diakonoff + + + +Author + +Brown, John W. +0000-0001-5610-9855 +Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA. tortricidae. jwb @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5610 - 9855 +tortricidae.jwb@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Aarvik, Leif +Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1172 Blindern NO- 0318 Oslo, Norway. + + + +Author + +Timm, Alicia +Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2023 + +2023-04-05 + + +5263 + + +2 + + +217 +239 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 + +journal article +244282 +10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 +8c282ab2-3f26-45ca-a990-4258d37c92c8 +1175-5326 +7801028 +2B1317DB-B3DE-47DF-9DE9-D884A884ECC3 + + + + + + + +Gibbalaria mabalingwae +(Razowski) + +, revised status, new combination + + + + + + +Figs 9 +, +18 +, +25 + + + + + + + +Afroploce mabalingwae +Razowski, 2008a: 63 + + +; + +2015: 34 + +. + + + + + + +Afroploce mabalinguae +Razowski, 2008a: 57 + + +, 63, 66, 67, 68. [misspelling] + + + + + +Diagnosis +. + +Gibbalaria mabalingwae + +is nearly identical to + +G. scabellana + +, with a comparable forewing length and pattern ( +Figs 9 +, +18 +). However, the male genitalia can be distinguished from those of its relatives by the greatly reduced uncus ( +Fig. 25 +). + + +Types. + +Holotype +♁ ( + +mabalingwae + +), +South Africa +, +Limpopo +[Northern] +Province +, +Mabalingwe +, + +25 km +W Warmbaths + +, SE 24 28 +Cd +, [ca. + +1115 m + +], + +21 Mar 1996 + +, +B. Dombrowsky +, +light trap +, +Razowski +slide 311 ( +DMP +). + + + + +Paratypes +(5♁, +3♀ +). +South Africa +: +KwaZulu-Natal +: +Royal Natal National Park +, +Tendele +camp, + +1600 m + +, + +6–13 Dec 2004 + +, +M. Kopec +, + +23 Oct 2003 +, +25 Oct 2003 +, +27 Oct 2003 + +, at light, +L. Przybylowicz +( +ISEZ +). Drakensberg Park, Cathedral Peak, Didima, + +1400 m + +, + +26 Nov–2 Dec 2004 + +(1♁), +M. Kopec +( +ISEZ +). [These +paratypes +listed by Razowski are of uncertain species assignment.] + + + + + +Remarks +. The male +holotype +was collected near Warmbaths in far northern +South Africa +. The +paratypes +were collected further south, in Drakensberg in +KwaZulu-Natal +. Consequently, it is uncertain whether the +paratypes +are conspecific with the +holotype +. Further research may show that + +G. mabalingwae + +falls within the variation of + +scabellana + +. However, we provisionally treat it as a separate species because the greatly reduced uncus of the +holotype +appears to be unique to the genus. + + +In his original description of + +Afroploce mabalingwae +, +Razowski (2008a) + +indicates 5♁ and +3♀ +paratypes +(cited above); however, in his list of +paratypes +, there is no indication of which are males and which are females; and it is uncertain whether all of the females represent the same species. In a later paper, +Razowski (2015) +assigned the following specimens to + +Afroploce mabalingwae + +: Three specimens from +Republic of South Africa +( +Cape Province +, Knysna, +5.II.1996 +, at light, GS 6441; +Free State +, Clarens, +1750 m +, +10.II.1996 +, at light, GS 6454; and KwaZulu-Natal, Champagne Castle Hotel, Winterton, +1600 m +, +12‒13.II.1996 +, all leg. G. BASSI GBC). We examined the male from Knysna (GBC) and it is smaller than the +holotype +of + +A +. +mabalingwae + +, and the phallus is considerably longer than that of any congener. Hence, it is described as a new species ( + +G. longiphallus + +) above. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/87/372887D33E664A35EEF0FF08ABCDFC93.xml b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E664A35EEF0FF08ABCDFC93.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9ff72f7ab2d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E664A35EEF0FF08ABCDFC93.xml @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ + + + +Gibbalaria: A new genus of Olethreutini from the Afrotropical Region (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae), and a new combination in Cosmopoda Diakonoff + + + +Author + +Brown, John W. +0000-0001-5610-9855 +Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA. tortricidae. jwb @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5610 - 9855 +tortricidae.jwb@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Aarvik, Leif +Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1172 Blindern NO- 0318 Oslo, Norway. + + + +Author + +Timm, Alicia +Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2023 + +2023-04-05 + + +5263 + + +2 + + +217 +239 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 +1175-5326 +7801028 +2B1317DB-B3DE-47DF-9DE9-D884A884ECC3 + + + + + + + +Gibbalaria longiphallus +Brown and Aarvik + +, +new species + + + + + + +Figs 8 +, +24 + + + + +Diagnosis +. This species is described from a single male from Knysna, +South Africa +, identified by +Razowski (2015) +as + +Afroploce mabalingwae + +. It is superficially and morphologically extremely similar to other congeners, + +G. scabellana + +in particular, but can be distinguished by the exaggerated distal portion of the phallus. + + + + +Description +. Head: Brown; posterior half of labial palpus black. Thorax: Brown-gray, tegula brown proximally. Forewing length 8.0 mm; forewing ground color mixed gray and brown, grayish near costa, with some faint refractive bluish spots, suffusions and spots brownish and blackish ( +Fig. 8 +). Fringe gray, blackish terminally. Hindwing pale brownish cream above; fringe cream; male under side with irregularly ovoid patch of brownish gray secondary scales near middle of wing. Abdomen: Male genitalia ( +Fig. 24 +) with uncus short-triangular; socii fused to tegumen; valva broad to middle with short, small hairy lobe at basal edge of basal cavity; sacculus terminating in rounded flange, with long group of dense setae (Spc +1 +) above ventral edge, two stout spines at base of cucullus; cucullus moderately uniform in width, slightly narrowing postmedially; phallus moderately broad, short; vesica with one large and two smaller cornuti. Female unknown. + + + + +Type +. + +Holotype +♁, +South Africa +, +Western Cape Province +, +Knysna +, + +5 Feb 1966 + +, +G. Bassi +, slide +Bassi +6441 ( +GBC +). + + + + + +Distribution +. This species is known only from the +holotype +collected near Knysna in the +Western Cape Province +of +South Africa +. + + + + +Etymology +. The specific epithet refers to the comparatively long phallus of this species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/87/372887D33E674A2BEEF0F974ABC5FA53.xml b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E674A2BEEF0F974ABC5FA53.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5e10dbb6646 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E674A2BEEF0F974ABC5FA53.xml @@ -0,0 +1,417 @@ + + + +Gibbalaria: A new genus of Olethreutini from the Afrotropical Region (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae), and a new combination in Cosmopoda Diakonoff + + + +Author + +Brown, John W. +0000-0001-5610-9855 +Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA. tortricidae. jwb @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5610 - 9855 +tortricidae.jwb@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Aarvik, Leif +Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1172 Blindern NO- 0318 Oslo, Norway. + + + +Author + +Timm, Alicia +Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2023 + +2023-04-05 + + +5263 + + +2 + + +217 +239 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 + +journal article +244282 +10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 +8c282ab2-3f26-45ca-a990-4258d37c92c8 +1175-5326 +7801028 +2B1317DB-B3DE-47DF-9DE9-D884A884ECC3 + + + + + + + +Gibbalaria bagamoyo +( +Razowski & Wojtusiak, 2014 +) + +, +new combination + + + + + + +Figs 17 +, +27 +, +35 + + + + + + + +Afroploce bagamoyo +Razowski & Wojtusiak, 2014: 212 + + +. + + + + + +Diagnosis. +The male of + +Gibbalaria bagamoyo + +has a dark blackish gray patch of androconial scales on the underside of the hindwing and a dense patch of spiniform setae basal of the flange in the male genitalia. + +Gibbalaria bagamoyo + +can be separated by the more attenuate and dorso-posteriorly narrowed tegmen, the short uncus, and especially by the location of the patch of spiniform setae basal to the flange of the sacculus. The patch of male secondary scales on the underside of the hindwing is more compact and darker than in + +G. scabellana + +. + + + + +Redescription +. Head: Brownish. Thorax: Brownish with darker markings. Forewing length 5.5‒7.0 mm (n = 19); forewing slightly expanding distally; costa nearly straight; apex rounded; termen straight, somewhat oblique. Ground color cream sprinkled and suffused grayish brown; a diffuse dark median fascia with blackish brown median and costal spots; subterminal and apical fascia concolorous. Fringe damaged. Hindwing cream gray; cilia [remnants] creamish. Abdomen: Male genitalia ( +Fig. 27 +) with uncus short, tapering distally; socius broad, fused to tegumen laterally, densely hairy; gnathos weakly sclerotized, simple; valva broad to end of sacculus which is convex postbasally, with a plate-shaped ventroterminal lobe beyond which there is a strong, socketed spine; a second spine dorsad to latter at base of cucullus; patch of bronzy orange setae above concavity of sacculus; basal cavity broad with small hairy prominence subdorsally. Phallus large, slender, tapering distally; vesica with 3‒5 non-deciduous cornuti. Female genitalia ( +Fig. 35 +) generally as in + +G. scabellana + +; antrum with variably developed diverticulum; signum an oval dentate plate with 5‒7 larger anteriorly directed teeth. + + +DNA barcodes +. The four sequenced specimens form a BIN with the nearest neighbor as + +G +. +scabellana + +. + + + + +Type. + +Holotype +♁, +Tanzania +, +Mandera +, + +150 km +W Bagamoyo + +, + +15 Dec 1988 + +, +J. Wojtusiak +, GS 1471 ( +MJUK +). + + + +Additional Material Examined +. + +Kenya +: +Rift Valley Province +: +Nakuru District +, + +5km +ENE of Gilgil + +, +00°29’03.8”S +, +36°21’53.9”E +, + +2108 m + +, + +27 Nov‒1 Dec 2010 + +(1♁), +T + +. + +Gilligan +( +TGC +). +The +same locality as the previous, + +22‒24 Nov 2008 + +(1♁), +L. Aarvik +, +D. Agassiz +, A. +Kingston +, +NHMO + +slide 4150 ( +NHMO +). + +Malawi +[Nyasaland], +Limke +, [no date] (1♁), H. +Barlow +, +USNM + +slide 145,637 ( +USNM +). + +Tanzania +: +Morogoro +: +Uluguru Mountains +, road to +Nyandira +, + +10 Jul 2009 + +(1♁, +1♀ +), +J. & W. De Prins +, +USNM + + +slide 144,519 ( +RMCA +). +Mazimbu Orchard +, + +500 m + + +10 May 2010 + +(1♁), +J. & W. De Prins +( +RMCA +) + +. + +Morogoro Distr. +& +Town +, + +550‒600 m + +, + +14 Nov 1991 + +(1♁), slide LA 2006 ( +NHMO +); same data + +15‒29 Nov 1992 + +(6♁, +1♀ +), slide +NHMO 4119 +(♁) + + +and 4116 ( +♀ +); same data (2♁), + +20 Dec 1992 + +, slide +NHMO 4115 + + +and 4151; same data ( +1♀ +), + +22 Jun 1993 + +, slide LA 2307 ( +NHMO +) + +. + +Morogoro Distr. +: +Mindu Forest Reserve +, + +600 m + +, + +24 Jan 1993 + +(1♁), +L. Aarvik +( +NHMO +) + +. + +Uganda +, +Mpigi District +: +Mpanga Forest +, + +1200 m + +, + +25–29 Oct 2014 + +(2♁), +L. Aarvik +& +K. Larsen +, slide +NHMO 4114 +( +NHMO +) + +. + +Zimbabwe +: +Bulawayo +, [ +20.1325°S +, +28.6265°E +], + +15–23 Dec 1919 + +(1♁), A. J. +T + +. + +Janse +, +USNM + +slide 145,796 ( +DMP +). + + + + +Remarks +. Although identified as the +holotype +, the adult illustrated by +Razowski & Wojtusiak (2014 +: fig. 12) is not the +holotype +of + +G. bagamoyo + +(J. Razowski, personal communication); it is a second specimen that likely is not conspecific with the +holotype +. It differs dramatically from its congeners in facies. +Razowski & Wojtusiak (2014) +describe the facies of the female and state that it has a wing span of +27 mm +, over twice that of the male +holotype +(i.e., +12 mm +); dimorphism in size of other congeners is exceedingly limited, and none show such a great difference in forewing length. +Razowski & Wojtusiak (2014) +provide neither an illustration of the female nor a description of its genitalia (perhaps it has no abdomen), and do not cite its collection data in the specimens examined. Hence, we suspect it may not be conspecific with the +holotype +. Our concept of this species is based solely on the text description of the male, the illustration of its genitalia, and correspondence with J. Razowski. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/87/372887D33E6B4A3CEEF0FAD1AAF5F855.xml b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E6B4A3CEEF0FAD1AAF5F855.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8e5c62f296a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E6B4A3CEEF0FAD1AAF5F855.xml @@ -0,0 +1,540 @@ + + + +Gibbalaria: A new genus of Olethreutini from the Afrotropical Region (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae), and a new combination in Cosmopoda Diakonoff + + + +Author + +Brown, John W. +0000-0001-5610-9855 +Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA. tortricidae. jwb @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5610 - 9855 +tortricidae.jwb@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Aarvik, Leif +Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1172 Blindern NO- 0318 Oslo, Norway. + + + +Author + +Timm, Alicia +Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2023 + +2023-04-05 + + +5263 + + +2 + + +217 +239 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 +1175-5326 +7801028 +2B1317DB-B3DE-47DF-9DE9-D884A884ECC3 + + + + + + + +Gibbalaria +Brown and Aarvik + +, +new genus + + + + + + +Type +species: + +Sericoris scabellana +Zeller, 1852 + +. + + + + +Diagnosis +. Species of + +Gibbalaria + +are superficially similar to those of + +Thylacandra +Diakonoff + +(Grapholitini) and + +Astronauta +Diakonoff + +(Olethreutini), with a broadly triangular forewing that is mottled dark brownish black, lacking distinct pattern elements, and bears small rounded patches of curled or raised opalescent scales. The forewing pattern of + +Gibbalaria + +is also quite similar to that of + +Taiteccopsis +Razowski + +, but the latter lacks raised scales. Males of five of the eight recognized species of + +Gibbalaria + +bear a characteristic patch of dark androconial scales on the underside of the hindwing—a feature lacking in putatively related genera. + +Gibbalaria + +is also superficially similar to the Indo-Australian + +Diakonoffiana +Koçak + +, but the female genitalia have little in common—two large hollow signa in + +Diakonoffiana + +vs. a small reticulated area with a shallow pocket in + +Gibbalaria + +. + + +Two species of + +Gibbalaria + +(i.e., + +G. occidentana + +and + +G. chiloanei + +) show some similarities to + +Cosmopoda + +in regards to the male genitalia, with a distinctive elongate-rectangular uncus and a patch of exceedingly long setae from the junction of the cucullus and the sacculus. Although the female genitalia of these two species of + +Gibbalaria + +convincingly associate them with + +Gibbalaria + +, the female of + +Cosmopoda + +is unknown, so the relationship between the two genera remains unclear. The small diverticulum of the ductus bursae of females of + +Gibbalaria + +is somewhat reminiscent of that of + +Astronauta sinastra +Razowski & Wojtusiak, 2012 + +(see +Razowski & Wojtusiak 2012 +: fig. 59). + + +The male genitalia of most + +Gibbalaria + +are similar to those of + +Afroploce +Aarvik + +( + +Neopotamia + +group of Olethreutini), with the valva composed of a broad basal half and a somewhat long-rectangular distal half, with a pair of large, socketed spines near the outer edge of the valva just beyond the sacculus; a distinct subbasal process from the costa of the valva usually bearing spines; and the bases of the socii confluent with the dorsal part of the tegumen, often forming a distally attenuate, membranous, uncus-like structure. However, the two genera are superficially very dissimilar. The forewing pattern of + +Afroploce + +is most similar to that of many species of + +Megalota + +and + +Eccopsis + +of the + +Neopotamia + +group (sensu +Diakonoff 1973 +; +Aarvik 2004b +), and the forewing lacks raised scale patches. Also, males of + +Afroploce + +have a long anal roll of secondary scales at the base of the hindwing that is found in many Olethreutini, but lacking in + +Gibbalaria + +. The female genitalia of + +Gibbalaria + +share some features with members of the + +Neopotamia + +group ( +sensu +Diakonoff 1973 +; +Aarvik 2004b +), but the signum is unlike members of the group, reminiscent of that of + +Endothenia + +. That is, females of + +Gibbalaria + +typically have a patch of small rough sclerites surrounding a shallow invaginated pocket. + + + + +Description +. Head: Vertex with a pair of subdorsal patches of long gray and pale brown scales meeting along longitudinal line at mid-vertex; upper frons rough scaled with bronze and gray scales directed ventro-anterad; lower frons with smooth, appressed, dark gray scales; labial palpus upturned with pale brown scales, third segment short, barely exposed, all segments combined ca. 1.2 times horizontal height of compound eye; haustellum present, presumably functional; ocellus small, diameter ca. 0.1 that of base of scape; antenna slightly longer than 0.5 forewing length, pale orange scales in one row per segment, sensory setae extremely short in both sexes. Thorax: Tegula conspicuous; a pair of small, bronze metathoracic tufts in both sexes; male hindleg with broad brush of white scales from femur and second longer hair pencil from tibia just before junction with femur; venter of thorax mostly white, with white hair pencil from subdorso-anterior edge of mesothorax; legs mostly pale brown. Forewing length +5.5–8.5 mm +, broad, about 2.1 times as long as wide, weakly expanding terminad; costa evenly arched throughout, apex slightly rounded, termen straight or slightly convex ( +Figs 1–18 +); no costal fold in male; all veins separate, CuP well developed at margin, chorda present, M-stem present; forewing ground color gray brown to purplish gray, with irregular streaks of darker brown, red brown, and gray, with small, somewhat evenly spaced patches of raised leaden gray opalescent scales curled distally, but modified scales lacking in distal 0.25 of wing, mostly pale ocherous with an oblong spot of ground color at apex and irregular patch of cream or white scales extending from hind margin immediately before tornus to about end of discal cell; small, purple-black basal patch. Fringe concolorous with forewing. Hindwing usually whitish, more or less evenly overlaid with darker gray, including fringe, in male; mostly brown to fuscous gray, including fringe, in female ( +Figs 7 +, +11, 13, 15 +); males with irregularly rounded to subrectangular patch of pale gray to dark gray (nearly black) scales near middle of wing on underside ( +Figs 16–18 +) (lacking in + +G +. +occidentana + +and + +G. chiloanei + +); all veins present, M +1 +and M +2 +widely separated, M +3 +and M +4 +connate, CuA2 originating about 0.7 length of discal cell, cubital pecten present in both sexes, patch of longer, slender scales along most of 1A+2A. Fringe pale gray to brown, mostly concolorous with forewing; scales in anal area of male conspicuously larger and white, rounded apically; scales in anal area of female brown, narrower, forked apically. Abdomen: Pale gray dorsally, white to cream ventrally; smooth scaled without external modification. Male genitalia ( +Figs 19–29 +) with uncus variable among groups, short, attenuate fused with base of socius, lacking setae apically, or long, broad, expanding terminad, concave apically with patch of long slender spines; socii fused to tegumen throughout their length, including basal portion of uncus, which appears to represent a dorsal extension of the fused bases of the socii; gnathos weak; tegumen triangular, either attenuate or broadly rounded dorsally, pedunculi not curved, vinculum U-shaped; valva broad basally, abruptly narrowed at middle, distal 0.5 nearly uniform in width, somewhat long-rectangular; sacculus with broad flange in distal 0.3, with patch of variable hairlike setae (Spc +2 +), usually with a pair of large socketed spinelike setae (Spc +1 +) at distal termination of sacculus; basal cavity broad with small setose prominence subdorsally just beneath a lobe-like, protruding, setose flange forming baso-dorsal margin of basal cavity; cucullus occupying distal 0.5 of valva. Phallus ca. 0.5 length of valva, weakly curved in distal 0.2, with patch of 2–6 non-deciduous cornuti (variable within and among species), one cornutus with a broader rounded base. Female genitalia ( +Figs 30–36 +) with papillae anales mostly parallel-sided, unmodified; apophyses long and slender, anteriores slightly longer than posteriores; sterigma moderate, triangular or semicircular, in form of two lateral plates extending from elongate dorsal part, with sclerotized edges in postvaginalis; ostium large; antrum broad with two lateral dilations, sclerotized, asymmetrical, either parallel-sided or weakly expanded anteriorly; ductus bursae membranous, conspicuously elbowed with short diverticulum on left side immediately anterad of antrum, remainder narrow, frail; corpus bursae rounded-oblong; signum a large, coarse, pocketlike scobinate plate, often with a single longer tooth. + + + +FIGURE 1. +Maximum (ML) likelihood tree for species of + +Gibbalaria + +and out-groups. + + + + +FIGURE 2. +Bayesian tree for species of + +Gibbalaria + +and out-groups. + + +Sexual dimorphism in most species is slight. Females lack the male secondary scaling of the hindwing undersurface and scale pencils of the hind tibia. Also, in the female, the pale markings in the terminal region of the forewing typical of males are overscaled with darker scales, rendering an overall more uniform darker appearance; and females have a much darker brown hindwing. + +DNA barcodes +. Sequence data are available for five of the eight species provisionally assigned to + +Gibbalaria + +. Both ML and Bayesian trees ( +Figs 1 +, +2 +) provide evidence that + +Gibbalaria + +is monophyletic, comprising two distinct lineages, consistent with morphology: one that includes + +G. divergana + +, + +G. occidentana + +, and + +G. chiloanei + +, and the other that includes the remaining species. The analyses also suggest a close relationship with + +Eccopsis + +, but with less support. + + +Relationships +. Although +Diakonoff (1973) +transferred + +sistrata + +to + +Celypha + +in the subtribe +Olethreutae +(based on the male only), + +Gibbalaria + +appears to be related to members of +Neopotamiae +( +Diakonoff 1973 +, +Aarvik 2004b +) on the basis of features of the male genitalia, but closer to + +Endothenia + +based on the signum in the female genitalia. The male genitalia and barcodes indicate a close relationship to + +Afroploce + +among members of the + +Neopotamia + +group. Autapomorphies of the genus include the patches of raised scales of the forewing, the patch of male secondary scaling on the underside of the hindwing (absent in three species), the fusion of the socii to the basal part of the uncus (absent in two species), the flange from the lower margin of the valva immediately basal of the cucullus, and the short diverticulum of the ductus bursae. + + + + +Distribution and Biology +. As presently defined, + +Gibbalaria + +includes eight species recorded from +South Africa +, +Tanzania +, +Malawi +, +Zimbabwe +, +Cameroon +, +Kenya +, +Gabon +, and the +Democratic Republic of Congo +, occurring from near sea level in the +Western Cape Province +of +South Africa +to about +1600 m +in +KwaZulu-Natal Province +, +South Africa +. The early stages are unknown. + + + + +Etymology +. The generic name is from the Latin “gibba,” meaning bump or hump, and “alar,” meaning wing, and refers to the raised scales of the forewing. It is interpreted as feminine. + + + + +Remarks +. Subtle variation in features of the male and female genitalia within and among some of the species are difficult to quantify, making it challenging to precisely circumscribe some taxa. In addition, DNA barcode data show patterns of divergence that are difficult to associate with morphology. Hence, some of the species defined herein may represent species complexes (e.g., + +G. scabellana + +), and the proposed synonymies are not beyond question. For example, although the genitalia of +two male +specimens included in + +G. chiloanei + +show variation which we consider to represent species-level differences, DNA barcodes convincingly place the two together in the same BIN, as conspecific. At the other end of the spectrum, we can find no compelling morphological characters for separating specimens we consider to represent + +G. scabellana + +, yet DNA barcodes suggest there are at least two species concealed under our concept. Consequently, we must consider our circumscribed species as merely “estimates,” some of which lack distinct morphological boundaries. Nonetheless, we hope this contribution provides a framework for additional work on the genus when more specimens and DNA barcodes become available. + + + + + + +Key to males of + +Gibbalaria + + + + + + + + +1. Underside of hindwing without patch of gray to black secondary scales; uncus long with distinct junction at top of tegumen; socii not fused to base of uncus; costa of valva with a basal or subbasal process or region bearing slender spines......... 2 + + +1’. Underside of hindwing with conspicuous patch of gray to black secondary scales; uncus broad basally (short or ill defined), without distinct junction at top of tegumen; socii fused to base of uncus; costa of valva without a basal process or region of slender spines........................................................................................ 3 + + + + + +2. Flange at lower base of cucullus broad, with inner patch of setae not exceeding basal width of flange......... + +occidentana + + + + + +2’. Flange at lower base of cucullus narrow, with inner patch of setae exceeding basal width of flange.............. + +chiloanei + + + + + + + +3. Sacculus with dense patch of spiniform setae (Spc +2 +) above “flange,” immediately below base of cucullus................ 4 + + + + +3’. Sacculus with dense patch of spiniform setae (Spc 2) basal to “flange”................................... + +bagamoyo + + + + + + + +4. Tegumen broadly rounded in dorso-posterior half....................................................... + +analcis + + + + +4’. Tegumen more narrowly rounded dorso-posteriorly.......................................................... 5 + + + + + +5. Phallus conspicuously elongate and attenuate in distal half............................................ + +longiphallus + + + + +5’. Phallus more-or-less truncate distally...................................................................... 6 + + + + + +6. Uncus greatly reduced....................................................................... + +mabalingwae + + + + + +6’ Uncus short, tapering distally................................................................... + +scabellana + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/87/372887D33E784A2AEEF0FA71ABB0F9BB.xml b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E784A2AEEF0FA71ABB0F9BB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4905d47fe06 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E784A2AEEF0FA71ABB0F9BB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,346 @@ + + + +Gibbalaria: A new genus of Olethreutini from the Afrotropical Region (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae), and a new combination in Cosmopoda Diakonoff + + + +Author + +Brown, John W. +0000-0001-5610-9855 +Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA. tortricidae. jwb @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5610 - 9855 +tortricidae.jwb@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Aarvik, Leif +Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1172 Blindern NO- 0318 Oslo, Norway. + + + +Author + +Timm, Alicia +Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2023 + +2023-04-05 + + +5263 + + +2 + + +217 +239 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 + +journal article +244282 +10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 +8c282ab2-3f26-45ca-a990-4258d37c92c8 +1175-5326 +7801028 +2B1317DB-B3DE-47DF-9DE9-D884A884ECC3 + + + + + + + +Gibbalaria analcis +( +Razowski, 2015 +) + +, +new combination + + + + + + +Figs 14, 15 +, +28, 29 + + + + + + + +Afroploce analcis +Razowski 2015: 34 + + +. + + + + + + +Nepheloploce prodroma +Razowski 2015: 35 + + +(in part). + + + + + +Diagnosis +. Males of + +G. analcis + +has a dark grayish black patch of androconial scales on the undersurface of the hindwing, as in many congeners. However, in + +G. analcis + +the patch continues into the lower portion of the discal cell, whereas in all other species the patch of scales is restricted to the area below the cell. + +Gibbalaria analcis + +can be further distinguished superficially by its forewing maculation, which has a considerably broader area of pale scaling in the tornal and subterminal regions. The male genitalia of + +G. analcis + +( +Figs 28, 29 +) are easily distinguished by the rounded dorso-posterior half of the tegumen, in combination with a very short uncus. + + + + +Redescription +. Head: Rough scaled, grayish brown; labial palpus mostly pale tan on outer surface, mostly cream on inner surface. Thorax: Dorsum grayish brown mixed with darker markings; metathoracic tuft scales pale gray with white tips [lost on most specimens]. Forewing length 7.3–8.0 mm (mean = +7.5 mm +; n = 5) in males, 8.0 mm (n = 1) in female; forewing broad, weakly expanding distally; costa evenly convex; termen slightly oblique, indistinctly convex; in male, ground color pinkish white in distal 0.33 of wing, remainder mixed with brown, diffusely strigulated dark brown with some faint, refractive, slight raised grayish spots; ill-defined, small patch of darker scales at base and at costa ca. 0.33 and ca. 0.65 distance from base to apex; apical region pale, with cream and pale gray scales, pale brown at apex; in female darker throughout. Fringe blackish gray [mostly lacking]. Hindwing cream and pale gray above in male; brown in female; in male, fringe cream to white, with scales at inner angle much larger, round-tipped; in female, fringe mostly brown throughout, with scales at inner angle forked; male underside with irregularly ovoid patch of blackish gray secondary scales near middle of wing, with a few paler brown scales along inner margin of discal cell; female underside without secondary scales; scales fork-tipped at inner angle. Abdomen: Male genitalia ( +Figs 28, 29 +) with uncus short, but at least partially parallel-sided, confluent with top of tegumen; socius broad, fused to tegumen laterally throughout their length; gnathos membranous, ill defined; tegumen triangular, somewhat ovoid in top half; valva broad basally, abruptly narrowed at middle, distal 0.5 (= cucullus) nearly uniform in width, somewhat long-rectangular, but slightly broadened and rounded apically; subbasal process of costa of valva large, rounded-triangular, densely covered with fine setae dorsally; sacculus with subrectangular flange in distal 0.3, with brush of bronze-orange, hairlike setae (Spc +2 +) basal to flange; a pair of strong, conspicuously socketed setae between basal portion of cucullus and flange of sacculus. Phallus ca. 0.5 length of valva, nearly straight, vesica with two deciduous cornuti. Female genitalia ( +Fig. 36 +) with papillae anales broadest near middle, rounded at each end; apophyses posteriors and anteriores about equal in length; ostium with narrow, sclerotized edges laterally, with edges approaching each other posterad; antrum parallel-sided, lightly sclerotized, about as wide as ostium, followed by membranous ductus bursae with short triangular diverticulum on left side. + + +DNA barcodes +. + +DNA barcodes from +two specimens +, one from the Democratic Republic of Congo and one from +Gabon +, represent a BIN ( +BOLD +: +ADE2144 +) + +. + + +Types +. + +Holotype +♁, +Republic of Cameroon +, +Dint Efok +, + +40 km +NE Yaounde + +, + +29‒31 Oct 1986 + +, +G. Bassi +, GS 6476 ( +GBC +). [male photo; genitalia photo] + + + + +Paratype +(♁). +Republic of Cameroon +: +Dint Efok +, + +40 km +NE Yaounde + +, + +29‒31 Oct 1986 + +, +G. Bassi +, GS 6480 ( +GBC +) + +. + + + +Additional Material Examined. +Cameroon +: +Dint. Efok +, + +40 km +NE Yaounde + +, 29‒31 Oct 1986 ( +1♀ +), +G. Bassi +, +Bassi +6468 [paratype of + +N. prodroma + +] ( +GBC +) + +. + +Congo Belge [ +Democratic Republic of Congo +]: P.N.A. [ +Parc National Albert +], + +13 Nov 1956 + +(1♁), + +13 Oct 1956 + +(3♁), + +8 Nov 1956 + +( +1♀ +), +P. Vanschuybroeck +, +USNM +slides 145,605 ( +♀ +), 144,470 (♁), 145,651 (♁) ( +RMCA +). + + +Bas-Congo +, +Nat. Res. Luki-Mayumbe +, + +320 m + +, 5°37, 13°05’, + +23 May 2007 + +(1♁), +J. & W. De Prins +( +RMCA +), +USNM +slide 145,604 + +. + + + + +Distribution +. This species is known from +Gabon +(sequence in BOLD), the +Republic of Cameroon +, and the +Democratic Republic of Congo +. + + + + +Remarks +. A female +paratype +of + +Nepheloploce prodroma +Razowski, 2015 + +is almost certainly the opposite sex of the +holotype +of + +Afroploce analcis + +—it was collected at the same locality and during the same dates. Also, we assign +five specimens +from the +Democratic Republic of Congo +to this name based on a high degree of similarity in facies and male genitalia with the +holotype +of + +G. analcis + +. Although the uncus of the +holotype +of + +G. analcis + +(from +Cameroon +) is slightly shorter and more triangular than in specimens from the +Congo +(the +holotype +slide is extremely flattened, so the genitalia are slightly distorted), all other features are fairly consistent, including the shape of the flange and position of the patch of setae associated with the sacculus, the shape of the subbasal process from the costa of the valva, and the presence of two cornuti in the vesica. Nonetheless, given their disjunct occurrence and subtle differences, it is possible that specimens from the +Congo +represent an undescribed species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/87/372887D33E794A28EEF0F959AEABFDD7.xml b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E794A28EEF0F959AEABFDD7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a89253f0978 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/87/372887D33E794A28EEF0F959AEABFDD7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,275 @@ + + + +Gibbalaria: A new genus of Olethreutini from the Afrotropical Region (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae), and a new combination in Cosmopoda Diakonoff + + + +Author + +Brown, John W. +0000-0001-5610-9855 +Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA. tortricidae. jwb @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5610 - 9855 +tortricidae.jwb@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Aarvik, Leif +Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1172 Blindern NO- 0318 Oslo, Norway. + + + +Author + +Timm, Alicia +Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2023 + +2023-04-05 + + +5263 + + +2 + + +217 +239 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 + +journal article +244282 +10.11646/zootaxa.5263.2.3 +8c282ab2-3f26-45ca-a990-4258d37c92c8 +1175-5326 +7801028 +2B1317DB-B3DE-47DF-9DE9-D884A884ECC3 + + + + + + + +Cosmopoda graziani +( +Razowski, 2015 +) + +, +new combination + + + + + + +Figs 37, 38 + + + + + + + +Diakonoffiana graziani +Razowski, 2015: 36 + + +. + + + + + +Remarks +. Although described in + +Diakonoffiana +Koçak, 1981 + +, the male genitalia of + +Cosmopoda graziani + +have little in common with those of + +Diakonoffiana cyanitis +(Diakonoff, 1983) + +, the +type +species of + +Diakonoffiana + +. The species is transferred to + +Cosmopoda + +on the basis of the overall similarity of the uncus, tegumen, and valvae to those of + +Cosmopoda aenopus +Diakonoff, 1981 + +, described from +Madagascar +. + + + +FIGURES 30‒35. +Female genitalia of + +Gibbalaria + +. 30. + +G. divergana +, USNM + +slide 145.609; 31. + +G. occidentana +, USNM + +slide 145,620; 32. + +G. chiloanei +, USNM + +slide 145,979; 33. + +G. scabellana +, USNM + +slide 144,801; 34. + +G. scabellana +, USNM + +slide 145,652; 35. + +G. bagamoyo +, NHMO + +slide 4116. + + + +Superficially, + +C +. +graziani + +is similar to + +G. divergana + +, + +G. occidentana + +, and + +G. chiloanei + +, but the hindwing is weakly lobed at the anal angle and there is dense patch of thick secondary setae from the base of the hindwing ( +Fig. 37 +). The male genitalia ( +Fig. 38 +) are extremely similar to those of + +C. aenopus + +(see +Razowski 2015 +: fig. 22). Whereas the tegumen, uncus, and socii are similar to those of + +G. divergana + +, + +G. occidentana + +, and + +G. chiloanei + +, the valvae are dramatically different, conspicuously constricted basad of the cucullus resulting in a narrow neck that bears a patch of exceedingly long setae; and the flange at the base of the cucullus is lobe-like bearing a single long, strong spine and a small patch of shorter setae ( +Fig. 38 +). + + +Types. + +Holotype +♁, +South Africa +, +KwaZulu-Natal +, +Champagne Castle Hotel +, +Winterton + +1600 m + +, + +12–13 Feb 1996 + +, +G. Bassi +( +GBC +), +Razowski +slide 6420. + + + + +Paratypes +(1♁). +South Africa +, +KwaZulu-Natal +, +Champagne Castle Hotel +, +Winterton + +1600 m + +, + +12–13 Feb 1996 + +, +G. Bassi +( +GBC +), +GS 6480 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/28/D2/3728D2E382DCA62383E6C28A17035B96.xml b/data/37/28/D2/3728D2E382DCA62383E6C28A17035B96.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..00d3a46402d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/28/D2/3728D2E382DCA62383E6C28A17035B96.xml @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ + + + +Formicidae. + + + +Author + +Santschi, F. + +text + + +Voyage de Ch. Alluaud et R. Jeannel en Afrique Orientale (1911 - 1912). Résultats scientifiques. Hyménoptères + + +1914 + +2 + + +41 +148 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/8111/8111.pdf + +journal article +8111 + + + + +P. (Myrma) schistacea, st. fracta +, nov. + + + + +[[worker]]. - Longueur 6,5 a 7,5 mill. Noire, mate, le gastre assez luisant. Pilosite et pubescence comme chez +P. rugulosa Mayr. + + +Epistome a peine carene. Tete arrondie derriere les yeux. Pronotum(sans le cou) plus large que long. Les yeux tout a fait plats. L'epinotum a la face basale legerement convexe, du reste comme +P. schistacea Gerst +., dont elle differe surtout par sa petite taille et ses yeux plats. + + + +Afrique orientale anglaise: Fort-Hall (alt. 1.330 m., st. no 30, janv. 1912), 1 [[worker]] (type). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/24/3729245A97D3496B5DADBC6C192F7083.xml b/data/37/29/24/3729245A97D3496B5DADBC6C192F7083.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..31332a0b568 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/24/3729245A97D3496B5DADBC6C192F7083.xml @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@ + + + +Revision of Kadua (Rubiaceae) in the Marquesas Islands, French Polynesia, with description of the new species K. lichtlei + + + +Author + +Wagner, Warren L. + + + +Author + +Lorence, David H. + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2011 + +4 + + +125 +138 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.4.1601 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.4.1601 +1314-2003-4-125 +32692A14BC49FFEFE254133DAC781820 +576072 + + + + +Kadua lucei (Lorence & J.Florence) W.L.Wagner & Lorence, Syst. Bot. 30: 832 2005. + + + + +Hedyotis lucei +Lorence & J. Florence (Adansonia, +ser +. 3, 22: 225, 2000). [Basionym] + + + +Type. + +Marquesas Islands +: Fatu Hiva: au pied de la +crete +a +Touaouoho, env. 1000 m, 3 +Aout +1999, J.-P. Luce s.n. (Holotype P!) + + + +Description. + +Glabrous shrubs +1.5-2 m tall, leafy twigs 4-6 mm in diam., internodes compressed, bark brown, smooth to striate or rugulose. +Leaves +of a pair equal to subequal, blade elliptic to obovate-elliptic, (5.3 +-)10- +14.5 +x +(3.3 +-)7- +10 cm, discolorous, chartaceous to subcoriaceous, base acute to obtuse or rounded, apex acute +to +obtuse or rounded, often abruptly short acuminate, margin entire, weakly revolute; secondary veins 8-10 pairs, loosely brochidodromous, secondary veins prominulous on both surfaces, tertiary veins slightly prominulous below; petioles purple when fresh, +2 +-4 +x +2-5 mm, stout, adaxially flattened and slightly winged; stipules inter- and intrapetiolar, apex shortly cuspidate, sheath semicircular, 3 +x +4-7 mm, fused with the adaxial petiole bases. +Inflorescences +(only seen with old flowers and young fruits) terminal, corymbiform cymose, 8-9 +x +6 cm, peduncle 35 mm long, 2.5-3 mm in diameter, compressed, primary axis 2.5-3 cm +x +2-2.5 mm with two pair of secondary branches, the lower pair often branching once again, the upper pair unbranched, the ultimate branches each bearing 2-3 flowers, lower bracts foliaceous, suborbicular, 15 mm in diam. +Flowers +glabrous, about 30 per inflorescence, bracts broadly triangular, scarious, 1 +x +1.5 mm, pedicels stout, 2-3 +x +0.5-1 mm; hypanthium obconical, 2-3 mm long, calyx limb cupuliform, 2-3 mm long, calyx lobes 4, broadly triangular, 0.5-0.7 +x +1.5 mm; corolla fleshy, white when fresh, buds not seen, at anthesis salverform, tube purple tinged when fresh, 22-26 mm long, 1.7-2 mm wide medially, lobes 4, linear to oblong, recurved, 8-10 +x +1.5-2 mm, apex with a hook-like appendage 0.5-1 mm long; flowers possibly dimorphic; stamens included, anthers linear, 3-3.5 +x +0.3-0.4 mm, connective attached 2 mm from apex of tube; style included, 20 mm long, two stigmatic lobes linear, 2.5 mm long. +Fruits +on stout pedicels 5-7 mm long, capsules turbinate to obovoid-turbinate, old capsules 7-8 +x +6 mm, consisting of network of persistent vascular bundles enclosing endocarp, apex (beak portion above the calyx) 1-1.5 mm long. Seeds not seen. + + + +Distribution. +Marquesas Islands, Fatu Hiva where known only from a single small population on the summit ridge between Tekou and Touaouoho peaks. + + +Ecology. + +This new species was collected at 915-1000 m elevation on a steep, precipitous ridge crest in wet shrubland with species of + +Alsophila + +, + +Freycinetia + +, and + +Histiopteris + +. + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet honors its discoverer and first collector, Mr. Jean-Pierre Luce, an amateur naturalist, in recognition of his efforts to explore the most rugged mountainous zones of the Marquesas and thus increase our knowledge of their flora and vegetation. + + +Conservation status. + +The suitable habitat for + +Kadua lucei + +on Fatu Hiva (ca. 85 km2) is indicated as an endangered environment, threatened by feral animals and invasive plants, reducing the extent of the forest. Estimated population size is about 3-4 individuals. Following the criteria and categories of +IUCN (2001) + +Kadua lucei + +is assigned a preliminary Red List status of +Critically Endangered +(CR): B2a, B2b ( +i-iii +); D: B2: total area of occupancy less than 10 km2 (ca. 5 km2). B2a, a single population known; b ( +i-iii +), habitat continuing decline inferred. D, population estimated to number fewer than 250 individuals. + + + +Specimens examined. + +Marquesas Islands: +Fatu Hiva: sous la +crete +entre Tekou et Touaouoho, 915 m, 15 +fevrier +2000 (st), J.-Y. Meyer & J.-P. Luce 835 (PAP +, +PTBG). + + + +Discussion. + +This species is apparently related to + +Kadua tahuatensis + +from which it differs by its larger inflorescence reaching 8-9 cm long and 6 cm wide, more numerous flowers, about 30 per inflorescence, and larger white corollas with a longer purple-tinged tube 22-26 mm long. Although mature fruits of + +Kadua lucei + +are not known, old fruits are smaller than those of + +Kadua nukuhivensis + +and + +Kadua tahuatensis + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/4E/37294EA8931B78F15AEDD4AD5447E7E5.xml b/data/37/29/4E/37294EA8931B78F15AEDD4AD5447E7E5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e61fc79dbc7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/4E/37294EA8931B78F15AEDD4AD5447E7E5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Tribe + +Blediini +Adam +, 2001 + + + + + +Blediini +Adam +, 2001: 216 [stem: Bledi-]. Type genus: +Bledius +Leach, 1819. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/61/3729613B07C698D6805679D32349DE33.xml b/data/37/29/61/3729613B07C698D6805679D32349DE33.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d8199ca19bf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/61/3729613B07C698D6805679D32349DE33.xml @@ -0,0 +1,302 @@ + + + +Recent noteworthy findings of fungus gnats from Finland and northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae) + + + +Author + +Jakovlev, Jevgeni + + + +Author + +Salmela, Jukka + + + +Author + +Polevoi, Alexei + + + +Author + +Penttinen, Jouni + + + +Author + +Vartija, Noora-Annukka + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1068 +1068 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068 +1314-2828-2-1068 + + + + +Orfelia lugubris (Zetterstedt, 1851)* + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +MYCE-JS-2013-0208 +; recordedBy: +J. Salmela +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: Ostrobothnia borealis pars borealis; verbatimLocality: Tervola, Ruuttulammi; decimalLatitude: +66.207 +; decimalLongitude: +24.898 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: J. Salmela; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise trap +; eventDate: +2012-8-6/9-26 +; habitat: rich spring fen; Record Level: institutionCode: +JES + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +MYCE-JS-2012-0046 +; recordedBy: +J. Salmela +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: Lapponia kemensis pars orientalis; verbatimLocality: Savukoski, Joutenoja; decimalLatitude: +67.821 +; decimalLongitude: +29.440 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: J. Salmela; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise trap +; eventDate: +2012-7-10/8-16 +; habitat: headwater stream, seminatural boreal forest; Record Level: institutionCode: +JES + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +MYCE-JS-2013-0021 +; recordedBy: +J. Salmela +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: Lapponia kemensis pars orientalis; verbatimLocality: Savukoski, Joutenoja; decimalLatitude: +67.821 +; decimalLongitude: +29.440 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: J. Salmela; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise trap +; eventDate: +2012-8-16/9-18 +; habitat: headwater stream, seminatural boreal forest; Record Level: institutionCode: +JES + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +MYCE-JS-2013-0038 +; recordedBy: +J. Salmela +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: Lapponia kemensis pars orientalis; verbatimLocality: Savukoski, +Toermaeoja +; decimalLatitude: +67.846 +; decimalLongitude: +29.471 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: J. Salmela; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise trap +; eventDate: +2012-7-10/8-16 +; habitat: headwater stream, old-growth boreal forest; Record Level: institutionCode: +JES + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +A. Palmen +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: Lapponia enontekiensis; verbatimLocality: +Enontekioe +, Palojoensuu; decimalLatitude: +68.285 +; decimalLongitude: +23.095 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: C. +Lundstroem +; J. Jakovlev; Event: eventDate: +1865 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +MZHF + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +A. Humala +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: country: +Russia +; stateProvince: Republic Karelia; verbatimLocality: White Sea, is. Pechak; decimalLatitude: +64.625 +; decimalLongitude: +35.631 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: A. Polevoi; Event: samplingProtocol: +sweep net +; eventDate: +2001-7-24 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +FRIP + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +A. Humala +; individualCount: +2 +; sex: +male +; Location: country: +Russia +; stateProvince: Republic Karelia; verbatimLocality: White Sea, is. Russkiy Kuzov; decimalLatitude: +64.935 +; decimalLongitude: +35.128 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: A. Polevoi; Event: samplingProtocol: +sweep net +; eventDate: +2001-7-18 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +FRIP + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +A. Humala +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: country: +Russia +; stateProvince: Republic Karelia; verbatimLocality: White Sea, Perhludy archipelago, is. Yuzhnyi; decimalLatitude: +64.323 +; decimalLongitude: +36.481 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: A. Polevoi; Event: samplingProtocol: +sweep net +; eventDate: +2002-8-16 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +FRIP + + + + +Distribution + +Palaearctic. Widely distributed in Europe. Many of the older records were made as +Orfelia tristis +Lundstroem +, a junior synonym of +Orfelia lugubris +( +Kjaerandsen et al. 2007 +). The species occurs in central and northern Sweden ( +Kjaerandsen et al. 2007 +), the White Sea shore in Russian Karelia ( +Humala and Polevoi 2008 +), and Norway ( +Kjaerandsen 2012 +). New for Finland. + + + +Ecology + +Finnish records are from rich spring fens and headwater streams surrounded by coniferous forests. Karelian specimens were collected in riparian habitats of the White Sea. Immature stages are unknown. Generally, +Orfelia +species are web-spinners chiefly associated with dead wood ( +Jakovlev 2012 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEE0FEFFFA93FD34D5511F6B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEE0FEFFFA93FD34D5511F6B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..49e3f81790a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEE0FEFFFA93FD34D5511F6B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Monnioticopa planicoxa + +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 173 +, +174 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21579, dissected and mounted on a slide) from + +Asaj +ẚrus + +sp.; +North of Lubang Island +, the +Philippines +, ESTASE 2 cruise, +RV +“Jean Charcot”, +Stn CP +02 ( +14°05.4´N +, +120°02.5´E +), depth + +2050 m + +, +Métivier +coll., + +14 November 1984 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from the Latin +plan +(=flat) and +cçxa +, in reference to the flat, discoid coxa of swimming legs. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 173A +) eruciform, with thin exoskeleton, consisting of cephalosome, 5-segmented trunk, and short genitoabdomen. Body length 3.74 μm; maximum width about +1.2 mm +(across third pedi- gerous somite). Cephalosome ( +Fig. 173C +) wider than long (0.49× +1.04 mm +), with distinct posterodorsal margin, as wide as first pedigerous somite. First to fourth pedigerous somites well-defined from one another, but their tergites obscure or absent; trunk bearing 3 pairs of subcircular tubercles on ventral surface between first and second pedigerous somites ( +Fig. 173C +). Genitoabdomen segmentation uncertain due to post-fixation shrinkage. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 173B +) broad, oval, about 1.8 times longer than wide (243×135 μm), narrow proximally; armed with 1 major and 4 small, setule-like setae; major distal seta 87 μm long, 2 of small setae positioned at 44 and 70% of ramus length, other 2 small setae positioned distally. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 173C +) small. Antennule ( +Fig. 173D +) small, 201 μm long, tapering, 4-segmented, articulation between proximal 2 segments incomplete; armed with 0, 5, 2, and 7 small setae on first to fourth segments, respectively. Antenna ( +Fig. 173E +) 4-segmented, including short first segment; proximal 3 segments unarmed; fourth segment slightly longer than wide, with 1 small seta plus 1 small tubercle distally. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 173F +) with convex posterior margin, angular posterolateral corners, and ornamented with 2 patches of minute granules on ventral surface. Mandible ( +Fig. 173G +) represented by weakly curved, powerful claw. Maxillule ( +Fig. 173H +) bilobed; larger inner lobe tipped with 2 unequal, naked spines (45 and 26 μm long, respectively); small outer lobe tipped with 1 naked seta. Maxilla ( +Fig. 173I +) 2-segmented; broad proximal segment unarmed; distal segment slender, 3.35 times longer than wide (87×26 μm), armed with 3 setae (2 distally and 1 at proximal 45% of segment length). Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 biramous, with 2-segmented protopod ( +Fig. 174 +A-D); coxa extremely inflated, discoid; basis with small seta on outer margin; leg 1 additionally with inner distal seta ( +Fig. 174B +) on basis. Exopods of legs 1 and 2 unsegmented, armed with 2 setae (1 on lateral margin and 1at laterodistal corner) and 1 apical, triangular claw. Exopods of leg 3 ( +Fig. 174D +) and leg 4 same in segmentation and armature, 2-segmented; proximal segment with 1 spine at laterodistal corner; distal segment with 1 seta at laterodistal corner and 1 apical, triangular claw. Endopods short, wider than long, armed with 2 naked setae distally; laterodistal seta slightly longer than mediodistal seta in legs 1-3, but almost equal in length in leg 4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 174E +) lamellate, wider than long (370×674 μm), slightly narrowed in proximal third; armed with 4 minute setae (2 on medial margin, 1 near mediodistal corner, and 1 on distal margin). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 174F +) probably represented by 3 cusps on genital operculum. + + + +FIG. 173. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa planẚcçxa +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, caudal rami, dorsal; C, cephalosome and first pedigerous somite, ventral; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, labrum; G, mandible; H, maxillule; I, maxilla. Scale bars: A, 0.5 mm; B, 0.1 mm; C, 0.2 mm; D-I, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 174. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa planẚcçxa +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, basis and rami of leg 1; C, leg 2; D, leg 3; E, leg 5; F, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, C, D, 0.1 mm; B, 0.05 mm; E, 0.2 mm; F, 0.02 mm. + + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa planẚcçxa +gen. et sp. nov. +differs from other species of +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa +gen. nov. +in having a simple maxilla lacking the inner lobe, a 4-segmented antennule, and better developed setation on the exopods of swimming legs. Despite these differences, there are significant synapomorphies that allows the new species to be accommodated in the same genus. These synapomorphies include the claw-like, modified mandible, the 3- or 4- segmented digitiform antenna, the broad caudal rami armed with 1 major and several vestigial setae, and the bilobed maxillule. + + + +It is noticeable that + +MK +planẚcçxa + +gen. et sp. nov. +shares with the +type +species of the genus, the expanded, flattened coxa of the swimming legs, but the scale of the expansion is greater in +M +. +planẚcçxa +gen. et sp. nov. +than in the +type +species + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEE7FEF2FA93FD08D77C1F13.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEE7FEF2FA93FD08D77C1F13.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..172c10286a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEE7FEF2FA93FD08D77C1F13.xml @@ -0,0 +1,230 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Monnioticopa manadoensis + +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 171 +, +172 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21578, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +budẚstçma ẚncrustatum +Monniot F. +& +Monniot C. +, 1996 (MNHN-IT-2008-4103 = +MNHN +A3 +/ +EUD/76 +); N. +Sulawesi +, +Indonesia +, 13MI +W of Murex Resort +, +W of Manado town +OCDN 1283 +-F, +Site +MANADO 6 ( +01°23.56’N +, +124°32.62’E +), depth + +43 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +10 May 1993 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The +type +locality is the source of the name of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 171A, B +) eruciform, with soft exoskeleton; body length +1.29 mm +; maximum width 382 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalosome short, slightly narrower than first pedigerous somite. Trunk obscurely segmented; first to fourth pedigerous somites defined from one another by lateral constrictions, bearing indistinct dorsal tergites. Genitoabdomen recurved dorsally, 4-segmented; anal somite ( +Fig. 171C +) ornamented with 4 transverse rows of minute spinules on lateral surfaces; anal prominence distinct. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 171C +) rectangular, broad, slightly longer than anal somite, about 1.8 times longer than wide (80×44 μm), or- namented with numerous, minute spinules; armed with 1 large naked seta (38 μm long) positioned at 66% of ramus length plus 3 granule-like vestigial setae subdistally on dorsal surface. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 171D +) small, sub-rectangular, with rounded posterolateral corners. Antennule ( +Fig. 171E +) small, 87 μm long, 3-segmented, articulation between second and third segments incomplete; armed with 4, 1, and 8 small setae on first to third segments, respectively. Antenna ( +Fig. 172F +) about 70 μm long, digitiform, unarmed, 3-segmented with right angle curve between first and second segments; third segment longest, 33 μm long; second and third segments ornamented with scattered spinules. + + +Labrum semicircular, unarmed and unornamented. Mandible ( +Fig. 171G +) represented by large, powerful claw. Maxillule ( +Fig. 171H +) bilobed; larger inner lobe with 1 broad, spinulose seta apically; outer lobe shorter and narrower than inner, digitiform, tipped with 1 slender, naked seta. Maxilla ( +Fig. 171I +) bilobate, with broad basal part; inner lobe (endite of syncoxa) twice as long as outer lobe, armed with 1 spinulose seta apically; outer lobe armed with 1 small seta at mid-length plus 2 unequal distal setae, both characteristically sigmoid in shape. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of 2-segmented protopod and unsegmented rami ( +Fig. 171J, K +); basis with small outer seta. Exopods much smaller than endopods, tipped with 1 small claw and 1 small, circular lamella; exopod of leg 3 armed additionally with 1 large spine on lateral margin ( +Fig. 171K +). Endopods 59×29, 86×36, 91×38, and 89×38 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae on endopods 97 and 83, 105 and 89, 108 and 86, and 109 and 85 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 171L +) lamellate, nearly circular, as long as wide (172×176 μm), with 2 small setae; distance be- tween setae 118 μm. + + +Copepodid juvenile. +Body ( +Fig. 172A +) curved dorsally, consisting of cephalosome, 4-segmented trunk, and indistinctly 3-segmented genitoabdomen. First to fourth pedigerous somites each with faint tergite; fifth pedigerous somite not differentiated. Anal somite ornamented as in adult female. Caudal ramus 2.20 times longer than wide, armed as in adult female. + + + +FIG. 171. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa manadçensẚs +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, anal somite and caudal rami, dorsal; D, rostrum; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, mandible; H, maxillule; I, maxilla; J, leg 1; K, leg 2; L, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C-I, 0.02 mm; J-L, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 172. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa manadçensẚs +gen. et sp. nov. +, copepod juvenile. A, habitus, right; B, cephalic appendages; C, leg 1; D, leg 3; E, leg 4. Scale bars: A, 0.1 mm; B-E, 0.02 mm. + + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 172B +) semicircular. Antennule 2-segmented, armed with 4 setae on proximal segment and 11 setae on distal segment. Antenna 3-segmented, curved as in adult female, but not ornamented. Labrum ( +Fig. 172B +) semicircular, smooth. Mandible, maxillule, and maxilla as for adult female. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 biramous with 2-segmented protopods; basis bearing 1 small seta on outer margin. Leg 1 ( +Fig. 172C +) exopod 2-segmented; proximal segment of exopod with projecting laterodistal corner bearing pointed distal process and 1 thick spine; distal segment inserted into medial margin of proximal segment, armed with 2 thick spines distally (medial spine twice as long as lateral); endopodal segment 1.7 times longer than wide, 2 distal setae shorter than segment. Leg 2 same as leg 1. Leg 3 ( +Fig. 172D +) exopod 2-segmented; proximal segment of exopod armed with large spine at laterodistal corner; distal segment armed as in legs 1 and 2, but longer; endopodal segment twice as long as wide, armed as in legs 1 and 2. Leg 4 ( +Fig. 172E +) exopod unsegmented, armed with 3 small spines, 1 on lateral margin, 1 subdistal, and 1 distal; distal setae on endopodal segment short, less than half length of segment. Leg 5 not differentiated. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa manadçensẚs +gen. et sp. nov. +is distinguishable from its congeners by the possession of the 2 specialized (sigmoid in shape) setae located distally on the outer lobe of the maxilla. In addition, in +M +. +manadçensẚs +gen. et sp. nov. +the first segment of the antennule is armed with 4 setae and the third segment of the antenna is the longest segment. These features of the antennule and antenna are shared only with +M +. +fẚrma +gen. et sp. nov. +However, these two species are easy to separate because in +M +. +fẚrma +gen. et sp. nov. +the antenna is straight, the first to fourth pedigerous somites each bear a well-developed dorsal tergite, the inner lobe of the maxillule is unarmed, and the coxae of legs 1-4 each bear a large mediodistal projection. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEE9FEFBFA93FEE8D1611AAE.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEE9FEFBFA93FEE8D1611AAE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0f298753370 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEE9FEFBFA93FEE8D1611AAE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enteropsis hispida + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 177 +, +178 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21581, dissected and mounted on a slide) from + +Apl +ẚdẚum mernççensẚs + +(Brewin, 1956) (MNHN-IT-2008-552 = +MNHN +A1 +/ +APL +.B/215); +New Caledonia +, +Stn NC +16, platier de l’ïlot +Maitre +, near l’ïlot +Carnard +(under stones and in interstices between corals), depth + +3-8 m + +, +Monniot +coll., + +12 September 1985 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is derived from the Latin +hẚspẚd +(=hairy), referring to its hairy body. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 177A, B +) eruciform, unsegmented; body length 832 μm, excluding caudal rami; maximum width 216 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Body surface sparsely ornamented with scattered setules (or sensilla) ( +Fig. 177A, B, C +). Cephalosome, first to fourth pedigerous somites, and genitoabdomen defined by weak lateral and ventral constrictions. Cephalosome slightly narrower than first pedigerous somite, semicircular, 164 μm wide, with sclerotized sculpturing dorsally. First to fourth pedigerous somites each with sclerotized sculpturing dorsolaterally, as shown in +Fig. 177A and B +. Genitoabdomen tapering, short, 116 μm long, without any trace of articulations; genital apertures positioned laterally in middle of genitoabdomen; anal prominence small, but distinct and bilobed. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 177C +) represented by large, stiff caudal seta, 87 μm long. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 177D +) small, unsegmented, 2.1 times longer than wide (36×17 μm), slightly narrowing distally; armed with 8 naked setae (1 very small). Antenna ( +Fig. 177E +) very small, 32 μm long, digiti- form, 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed, 16×12 μm; distal segment 16×9 μm, armed with 1 spinulose apical spine (12 μm long) and ornamented with 2 transverse rows of spinules distally. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 177F +) longer than wide, with finely spinulose, convex posterior margin and 1 large, transparent, linguiform protrusion subdistally on ventral surface. Mandible absent. Maxillule ( +Fig. 177F +) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment bilobed; larger inner lobe tipped with 2 spinulose setae, larger seta 42 μm long, 2.6 times longer than smaller seta, bearing 2 prominent setules near proximal third; smaller outer lobe tipped with 2 equal, small spinulose setae (about 10 μm). Maxilla ( +Fig. 177G +) 2-segmented, subchelate, robust; proximal segment with 1 tubercle-like process on medial margin, opposing tip of terminal claw of distal segment; with pore of maxillary gland subdistally on posterior surface; distal segment bearing strong, curved terminal claw and 1 proximal seta laterally. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 178 +A-C) 2-segmented; proximal segment (coxa) unarmed, ornamented with large setules on ventral surface; numbers of setules +4 in +leg 1, 5 in leg 2, and +3 in +legs 3 and 4. Distal segment subcircular or subquadrate, tipped with 1 small claw (representing exopod) embedded in transparent covering and with 1 setule near base of claw; endopod absent. Leg 5 absent. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The armature of the labrum seems to be a useful character for distinguishing between species of +bnterçpsẚs +. The armature of the labrum is known for most species of the genus, with the exception of +b +. +çnychçphçra +Schellenberg, 1922 +. +Schellenberg (1922) +described for the labrum as “Oberlippe mit behaarten Borsten” (upper lip with hairy bristles). This indicates that the labrum of +b +. +çnychçphçra +is armed with 2 or more setiform processes. In the other 11 known species of +bnterçpsẚs +the labrum is unarmed (in three species) or armed with 2 to 8 processes (in the remaining eight species) ( +Table 7 +). Therefore, the possession of a single, broadly linguiform process on the labrum is a unique feature of +bnterçpsẚs hẚspẚda +sp. nov. + + +The form and armature of the antenna of +bK hẚspẚda +sp. nov. +also is characteristic. It is digitiform, 2-segmented, and tipped with a spine, whereas in other known species the antenna is typically broad and its distal segment is unarmed, or transformed to a claw, or armed with 2 spines (or setae). +bnterçpsẚs hẚspẚda +sp. nov. +can be distinguished by these two diagnostic features, together with its characteristic caudal rami which are each represented by a single large seta. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEEBFEE7FA93FC39D4CC19D7.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEEBFEE7FA93FC39D4CC19D7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4e0ab12ba0d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEEBFEE7FA93FC39D4CC19D7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enteropsis elongata + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 179 +, +180 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21582), +14 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21583), and +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17400) from + +Bçtryllç +ẚdes nẚger + +Herdman +, 1886 (MNHN-IT-2008-1688 = +MNHN +S1 +/ +BOT +.A/23); +Guadeloupe +Stn +13, sand bank west of l’îlet à +Cochons +, depth + +5-10 m + +, +Monniot +coll., + +23 December 1980 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species reflects its elongate vermiform body. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 179 +A-C) vermiform, cylindrical, elongate, unsegmented in expanded adult, but distinctly segmented in young adult ( +Fig. 179C +). Mean body length +1.03 mm +( +0.86-1.16 mm +, n=8); dissected young adult ( +Fig. 179C +) 1.0 mm long. Cephalosome ( +Fig. 179E +) slightly longer than wide, with patch of setules on ventrolateral surface lateral to oral region. Fourth pedigerous somite bearing pair of lateral, lobate processes just posterior to leg 4 ( +Fig. 179 +A-C). Genitoabdomen occupying about 18% of body length; genital apertures positioned dorsolaterally. Anal region elevated dorsally ( +Fig. 179A, B +); part of genitoabdomen posterior to anus tapering towards blunt apical margin. Caudal rami and caudal seta absent. + + +Rostrum absent ( +Fig. 179E +). Antennule ( +Fig. 179F +) small, unsegmented, tapering, about 1.24 times longer than wide (21×17 μm), with convex ventral margin, and armed with 7 unequal, naked setae. Antenna ( +Fig. 180A +) coni- cal, 37×25 μm, incompletely 2-segmented; both segments unarmed but ornamented with numerous spinules; distal segment triangular, about half as long as proximal segment. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 179G +) with spinulose ventral surface, convex posterior margin, and armed with 2 pairs of slender, spinulose, setiform processes. Mandible absent. Maxillule ( +Fig. 180B +) bilobed; narrower inner lobe tipped with 2 elements (1 plumose seta and 1 spinulose, setiform process); broader outer lobe tipped with 1 spiniform cusp and ornamented with spinules and setules on posterior and outer surfaces. Maxilla ( +Fig. 180C +) massive, 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed, with inflated, spinulose mediodistal protrusion; distal segment terminating in claw, bearing lateral spine proximally. Maxilliped absent. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 180D +) biramous, with 2-segmented protopod; proximal and distal segments of protopod unarmed but ornamented with rows of spinules on anterior surface; rami small, vestigial; exopod claw-like with transparent covering; endopod fleshy, conical. Legs 2-4 same as leg 1. Leg 5 absent. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +FIG. 179. +bnterçpsẚs elçngata +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, habitus of young adult, right; D, genitoabdomen, dorsal; E, cephalosome, ventral; F, antennule, posterior; G, labrum. Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm; D, 0.05 mm; E, 0.02 mm; F, G, 0.01 mm. + + + + +FIG. 180. +bnterçpsẚs elçngata +sp. nov. +, female. A, antenna; B, maxillule; C, maxilla; D, leg 1. Scale bars: 0.01 mm. + + + + +Remarks. +The most significant feature of +bnterçpsẚs elçngata +sp. nov. +is the lack of caudal rami. This feature is shared with three congeners, +b +. +abbçttẚ +Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +, +b +. +fusẚfçrmẚs +Ooishi, 2009, and +b +. +mẚnçr +Illg & + +Dudley +1980 + +. +bnterçpsẚs elçngata +sp. nov. +is readily distinguishable from these species because in all three the distal segment of the antenna is transformed to a claw compared with the blunt, conical segment in +b +. +elçngata +sp. nov. +In addition, +b +. +elçngata +sp. nov. +has a labrum armed with 4 setiform processes and the outer lobe of the maxillule is tipped with a single cusp, both of which are unique features of the new species, differentiating it from all congeners. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEEDFEFBFA93F925D4F91C33.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEEDFEFBFA93F925D4F91C33.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aaeb91d34ec --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEEDFEFBFA93F925D4F91C33.xml @@ -0,0 +1,547 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Periboia tahitiensis + +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 175 +, +176 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21580, dissected and mounted on 2 slides) from + +Asc +ẚdẚa archaẚa + +Sluiter +, 1890 +( +MNHN-IT-2008-866 = +MNHN +P5 +/ +ASC +.A/166); +Tahiti, N +. +Moorea I. +, +W. Motu d’Irioa +, +Stn M +13, +Monniot +coll., + +June 1984 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The +type +locality provides the name for the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 175A +) large, vermiform, divisible into prosome and urosome; body length 11.0 mm; maximum width +2.80 mm +(across third pedigerous somite). Prosome consisting of cephalosome and first to fourth pedigerous somites, incompletely segmented, but clearly defined by deep constrictions between somites. Cephalosome small, circular, 1.14× +1.36 mm +. First to fourth pedigerous somites all similar in length and lacking dorsal tergite. Urosome ( +Fig. 175B +) 3-segmented, consisting of fifth pedigerous somite, genital double-somite, and unsegmented abdomen. Fifth pedigerous somite elongated, 1.36× +1.09 mm +, bearing leg 5 posterolaterally. Genital double-somite obscurely defined from fifth pedigerous somite, wider than long, about 0.45× +1.09 mm +, laterally convex; genital apertures located dorsolaterally, covered by leg 5. Abdomen 770×710 μm, lacking anal operculum or anal prominence. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 175B +) elongate, about 3.8 times longer than wide (727×190 μm), unarmed, with parallel lateral margins, and rounded distal margin. + + + +FIG. 175. +merẚbçẚa tahẚtẚensẚs +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, ventral; B, leg 5 and genitoabdomen, dorsal; C, cephalic appendages (Lb = labrum), ventral; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, mandible; G, H, maxillule; I, maxilla. Scale bars: A, 1 mm; B, 0.5 mm; C, F, I, 0.1 mm; D, E, G, H, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 176. +merẚbçẚa tahẚtẚensẚs +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 3; C, leg 4; D, leg 5; E, genital aperture. Scale bars: A-D, 0.02 mm; E, 0.05 mm. + + + +Rostrum represented by short ridge between antennules ( +Fig. 175C +). Antennule ( +Fig. 175D +) 2-segmented; proximal segment slightly longer than wide (139×124 μm), narrowing distally, armed with 1 seta on posterior margin and 1 minute setule subdistally; distal segment about 1.7 times longer than wide (68×39 μm), unarmed. Antenna ( +Fig. 175E +) curved, digitiform, 3-segmented, unarmed; first to third segments 89×91, 76×67, and 98×45 μm, re- spectively, narrowing from proximal to distal; anterior surface of second and third segments covered with minute spinules. + + +Labrum (indicated by Lb in +Fig. 175C +) rudimentary, flexible, not covering any oral appendages. Mouth (indicated by arrowhead in +Fig. 175C +) visible just posterior to labrum. Mandible ( +Fig. 175F +) positioned lateral to mouth, short, bearing strong claw distally, with dense sclerotized area between proximal part and claw. Maxillule ( +Fig. 175G, H +) bilobed; larger inner lobe with 2 broad, unequal setae apically and ornamented with numerous minute spinules on distal surfaces and setae; small outer lobe digitiform, tipped with 1 spine (or spiniform seta). Maxilla ( +Fig. 175I +) bilobate, with short proximal part; both lobes ornamented with transverse rows of minute spinules; inner lobe (endite of syncoxa) tapering, tipped with 1 broad, spinulose seta; outer lobe longer than inner, rectangular, armed with 1 small spine on outer margin and 2 triangular spines at apex. Ventral surface of cephalosome between left and right maxillae bearing broad, linguiform protuberance (arrowed in +Fig. 175C +). Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 all same in form and structure ( +Fig. 176 +A-C); each leg consisting of small free exopod plus fleshy, tapering, unsegmented process formed by complete fusion of protopod and endopod. Exopods flattened, lamellate, tapering, tipped with small claw (or claw-like process). Legs 2-4 larger than leg 1. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 176D +) small, lamellate, unarmed, wider than long (376×636 μm), narrowing distally, and covering only anterior part of genital double-somite. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 176E +) probably represented by 2 small cusps on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +This species, with a female body length of 11.0 mm, is the largest known member of the family +Enteropsidae +. + + + +Genus + +Enteropsis +C.W.S. +Aurivillius, 1885 + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Female: Body eruciform or vermiform, unsegmented or indistinctly segmented, without dorsal tergites. No prosome-urosome division present. Anus positioned posteriorly or on dorsal surface posterior to genital apertures. Caudal rami absent, or reduced and armed with at most 1 seta or spine. Rostrum not developed, usually absent. Antennule small, 1- to 3-segmented, armed with few small setae. Antenna up to 4-segmented, usually 2-segmented; terminal segment forming claw, or tipped with 1 or 2 spines or processes. Labrum unarmed or armed with 2 to 8 processes or setiform elements. Mandible absent. Maxillule bilobed, armed with 1 to 3 (usually 2) apical setae or processes on inner lobe and 0 to 5 (usually 2 or 3) apical setae or processes on outer lobe. Maxilla robust, unguiform, 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment terminating in strong claw, with 1 small seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. Legs 1-4 consisting of 2-segmented, unarmed protopod and rudimentary exopod and endopod; intercoxal plates absent. Leg 5 absent. + + +Male +: Unknown. + + + + + +Type +species. + +bnterçpsẚs sphẚnx +Aurivillius, 1885 +by original monotypy. + + + + +Remarks. +Copepods of the genus +bnterçpsẚs +are associated with solitary and compound ascidians. +Ooishi (2009a) +recognized 11 species as valid in +bnterçpsẚs +and Kim I.H. & Moon (2011) subsequently described a new species of this genus. In the present work, we add five additional new species. The major taxonomic characters that can be used to differentiate between these 17 species include the distal armature of the caudal rami, the segmentation and setation of the antennule, the terminal armature of the antenna, the ornamentation of the labrum, and the armature of the maxillule (see +Table 7 +). + + + +TABLE 7. +Summary of major differences between species of +bnterçpsẚs +. Abbreviations: Atl = antennule, Ant = antenna, CR, caudal ramus, Mxl = maxillule, proc = process. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
SpeciesCR distal armatureAtl segs (setae)Ant terminal armatureLabrum proc.Setae on Mxl lobes Inner Outer
+b +. +abbçttẚ +Illg & +Dudley, 1980 +CR absent1 (5)Claw222
+b +. +arctẚca +Marchenkov, 1994 +Process1 (ca. 7)2 setae623
+b +. +capẚtulata +Illg & +Dudley, 1980 +02 (6)2 proc.523
+b +. +chattçnẚ +Monniot, 1961 +Spine2 (4)2 proc.022
+b +. +fusẚfçrmẚs +Ooishi, 2009 +CR absent1 (5)Claw612
+b +. +geçrgẚana +Schellenberg, 1922 +Process2 (7)2 proc.623
+b +. +mẚnçr +Illg & +Dudley, 1980 +-1 (5)Claw220
+b +. +nudus +Kim I.H. & Moon, 2011 +Spine1 (6)Claw022
+b +. +çnychçphçra +Schellenberg, 1922 +Seta1 (?)Claw?22
+b +. +rçscçffensẚs +Chatton & Brément, 1909 +Seta1 (7)Claw623
+b +. +sphẚnx +Aurivillius, 1885 +Spine2 (ca. 7)2 spines823
+b +. +superba +Illg & +Dudley, 1980 +Spine2 (10)2 spines023
+b +. +hẚspẚda +sp. nov. +Seta1 (8)Spine122
+b +. +elçngata +sp. nov +. +01 (7)0421
+b +. +çbtusa +sp. nov +. +02 (8)Claw322
+b +. +trçmsçensẚs +sp. nov. +Spine2 (7)Claw653
+b +. +tasmanẚca +sp. nov +. +Spine1 (10)2 spines623
+ + +Generic names ending in –opsis are feminine so in +Table 7 +we have amended the following names accordingly: +bnterçpsẚs arctẚcus +Marchenkov, 1994 +becomes +bK arctẚca +, +bK capẚtulatus +Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +becomes +bK capẚtulata +, +bK geçrgẚanus +Schellenberg, 1922 +becomes +bK geçrgẚana +, +bK nudus +Kim I.H. & Moon, 2011 becomes +bK nudaI bK çnychçphçrus +Schellenberg, 1922 +becomes +bK çnychçphçra +, and +bK superbus +Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +becomes +bK superba +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEEDFEFFFA93FDEDD7B41B23.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEEDFEFFFA93FDEDD7B41B23.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f180d2b158f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEEDFEFFFA93FDEDD7B41B23.xml @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Periboia + +gen. nov. + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Female. Body vermiform, divisible into prosome consisting of cephalosome and first to fourth pedigerous somites, and urosome comprising fifth pedigerous somite, genital double-somite and unsegmented abdomen. Caudal rami elongate, unarmed. Antennule 2-segmented, armed with few seta. Antenna digitiform, 3-segmented, unarmed. Labrum rudimentary, unarmed and unornamented. Mandible forming powerful claw. Maxillule unsegmented, unequally bilobed, with 2 apical setae on inner lobe and 1 seta on small outer lobe. Maxilla bilobate, with unarmed proximal part; inner lobe (endite of syncoxa) tipped with 1 seta; outer lobe armed with 1 seta on lateral margin and 2 spines distally. Maxilliped absent. Legs 1-4 each consisting of tapering, unsegmented process formed by fusion of protopod and endopod, plus small, lamellate, free exopod. Exopods tipped with small claw, but fused protopod and endopod unarmed. Leg 5 small, lamellate, unarmed. + + + + + +Type +species. + +merẚbçẚa tahẚtẚensẚs +gen. et sp. nov. +by original designation. + + + + +Etymology. +In Greek mythology, +merẚbçẚa +was a princess of the giants, daughter of the giant king Porphyrion. Gender feminine. + + + + +Remarks. +merẚbçẚa +gen. nov. +is undoubtedly closely related to +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa +gen. nov. +In both genera, the mandible forms a powerful claw, the antenna is digitiform and distinctly segmented, and the maxillule is bilobed. However, several significant features prevent its +type +species from being accommodated within +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa +gen. nov. +The most significant diagnostic feature of the new genus is found in the swimming legs, which consist of a small, free exopod and an elongate, unsegmented protopod-endopod complex. Within the +Enteropsidae +, a similar form of swimming legs is present in +iequerrea canuẚ +Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +(Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +), but the genus +iequerrea +can be clearly differentiated from +merẚbçẚa +gen. nov. +by the lack of antennae and by the structure of the mouthparts. + + +The body of female +merẚbçẚa +gen. nov. +is clearly divisible into prosome and urosome, and this can be considered as a diagnostic feature of the genus, because the prosome-urosome division is obscured by fusion of the fourth and fifth pedigerous somites in all known species of +Enteropsidae +. The caudal rami are also distinctive in +merẚbçẚa +gen. nov. +; they are elongate and unarmed, which differs from the broad caudal ramus, uniformly armed with 1 major and several vestigial setae in known species of +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa +gen. nov. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEF1FEE1FA93FDA5D19C1BCF.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEF1FEE1FA93FDA5D19C1BCF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..398c239fda8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEF1FEE1FA93FDA5D19C1BCF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,396 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enteropsis tasmanica + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 183 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21588, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +Styela pçlypes +Monniot C. +, +Monniot F. +& Millar, 1976; +Tasman +Sea, +RV +“Galathea” Expedition, Stn 601 ( +45°51’S +, +164°32’E +), depth + +4400 m + +, + +14 January 1952 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is derived from its +type +locality, the +Tasman +Sea, + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 183A +) fusiform, smooth, straight, unsegmented. Body length +3.15 mm +; maximum width +0.89 mm +(at anterior third). Cephalosome indistinctly defined from trunk by faint lateral wrinkles; posterior third of body tapering posteriorly; leg 4 positioned at 77% of body length. Abdomen ( +Fig. 183B, C +) about 160×220 μm, discernible from trunk by weak constriction. Genital areas ( +Fig. 183B, C +) located laterodistally on trunk, anterior to abdomen.Anal prominence weak, bilobed. Caudal rami narrow, widely separated from each other; each ramus ( +Fig. 183D +) about 2.6 times longer than wide (94×36 μm), shorter than abdomen, tipped with 1 naked spine (42 μm long). + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 183E +) semicircular, bearing 8 sensilla (4 proximal, 2 middle, and 2 subdistal). Antennule ( +Fig. 183F +) broad, tapering, unsegmented, about 110×73 μm, and ornamented with 3 setules; armed with 10 unequal setae (4 larger and 6 small, setule-like), 2 of larger setae articulating with swollen base. Antenna ( +Fig. 183G +) unsegmented, about 2.3 times longer than wide (132×58 μm), with tapering proximal two-thirds and narrow distal third, spinulose in distal half; armed with 1 subdistal and 1 distal, sparsely spinulose spines; lengths of subdistal and distal spines 42 and 55 μm, respectively. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 183H +) broad, spinulose on ventral surface and along convex posterior margin; armed with 6 broad, medially curved, spinulose setiform processes, medial 2 longer and broader than lateral 4. Mandible absent. Maxillule ( +Fig. 183I +) distally bilobed; inner lobe longer but narrower than outer lobe, tipped with 2 spinulose spines, 38 and 27 μm long; outer lobe spinulose, armed with 3 equal spines 28 μm long (2 on distal margin and 1 on medial margin). Maxilla ( +Fig. 183J +) 2-segmented; proximal segment broad with 1 small tubercle on medial margin; distal segment terminating in strong claw, with 1 small seta proximally on lateral margin. Maxilliped absent. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 183K +) 2-segmented, both segments much wider than long; distal segment bearing rudimentary exopod and endopod; exopod sclerotized inside; endopod fleshy, shorter than exopod. Legs 2-4 same as leg 1. Leg 5 absent. Leg 6 probably represented by 2 minute spinules in genital area ( +Fig. 183C +). + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The labrum of +bK tasmanẚca +sp. nov. +is armed with 6 setiform processes. Five other species of +bnterçpsẚs +( +b +. +capẚtulata +, +b +. +fusẚfçrmẚs +, +b +. +geçrgẚana +, +b +. +rçscçffensẚs +, and +b +. +arctẚca +) also have 6 (or 5 or 6) processes on the labrum, like +b +. +tasmanẚca +sp. nov. +The first four of these can be readily distinguished from the new species by the following characters: +b +. +capẚtulata +has rudimentary caudal rami and a distinctly 2-segmented antenna; +b +. +fusẚfçrmẚs +lacks caudal rami and has a claw-like distal segment of the antenna; +b +. +geçrgẚana +has a longer, 4-segmented genitoabdomen and a 2-segmented antennule (Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +); and +b +. +rçscçffensẚs +has a claw-like distal part of the antenna and lacks a rostrum ( +Ooishi, 2008b +). + + +The remaining species, +b +. +arctẚca +, is associated with several species of solitary ascidians in the White Sea ( +Marchenkov, 1994 +), and appears to be closely related to +b +. +tasmanẚca +sp. nov. +However, in +b +. +arctẚca +, the body is cylindrical (cf. fusiform in the new species), the caudal rami are vestigial with its terminal element not articulated from the ramus (cf. 2.6 times longer than wide), the antenna is 2-segmented (cf. unsegmented), the outer lobe of the maxillule is armed with 3 processes (cf. spines), and the 6 setiform processes on the labrum are small and subequal in length (cf. large, with median pair distinctly longer than lateral 4). These differences are sufficient to differentiate +b +. +tasmanẚca +sp. nov. +from +b +. +arctẚca +. + + + + +FIG. 183. +bnterçpsẚs tasmanẚca +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, posterior part of body, dorsal; C, posterior part of body, right; D, caudal ramus; E, rostrum; F, antennule; G, antenna; H, labrum; I, maxillule; J, maxilla; K, leg 1. Scale bars: A, 0.5 mm; B, C, 0.1 mm; D, E, J, K, 0.05 mm; F-I, 0.02 mm. + + + + + +Genus + +Mychophilus +Hesse, 1865 + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Female: Body vermiform, unsegmented. Anus positioned dorsally, anterior to genital apertures. Caudal rami rudimentary, tipped with 1 small seta. Rostrum weakly developed or absent. Antennule small, 1- or 2-segment- ed, armed with few setae. Antenna 1- to 3-segmented; terminal segment usually claw-like. Labrum bearing 3 to 6 setiform processes (lacking processes in +M +. +capẚllatus +Kim I.H. & Moon, 2011; labrum unknown in +M +. +fallax +Stock, 1967 +). Mandible absent. Maxillule bilobed, with 0 or 2 setiform processes on inner lobe and 2 or 3 processes on outer lobe. Maxilla lobate, 1- or 2-segmented, tipped with 1 seta; if 2-segmented, distal segment very small (maxilla of +M +. +capẚllatus +unusual, +bnterçpsẚs +- +type +). Legs 1-4 similar to those of +bnterçpsẚs +. Legs 5 and 6 absent. + + +Male +(of +M +. +rçseus +): Body cyclopiform, with clear prosome-urosome division. Prosome consisting of cephalosome and first to fourth pedigerous somites. Urosome 6-segmented, including fifth pedigerous somite. Caudal rami armed with 6 setae. Rostrum well-developed. Antennule 6-segmented; armature formula 13, 2, 2, 2, 1, 6+2 aesthetascs. Antenna 3-segmented; first segment with 1 seta; terminal segment spiniform. Labrum rudimentary. Mandible absent. Maxillule small, 2-segmented, with unarmed proximal and 3 setae-bearing distal segment. Maxilla as in female. Maxilliped absent. Legs 1-4 biramous with 2-segmented protopod; coxae unarmed; basis with outer seta. Leg 1 exopod 2-segmented; other rami of legs 1-4 all 3-segmented. First endopodal segment of leg 1 unarmed. Second endopodal segment of leg 4 with 2 medial setae. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 1:0-01-0I-0; I, I, 30-0; 0-1; 1, 1, 3
Leg 2:0-01-0I-1; I-1; II, I, 40-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 3
Leg 3:0-01-0I-1; I-1; II, I, 50-1; 0-1; 1, 2, 3
Leg 4:0-01-0I-1; I-1; II, I, 40-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 2
+ + +Leg 5 represented by 2 separated setae on surface of fifth pedigerous somite. Leg 6 absent. + + + + +Type +species. + +Mychçphẚlus rçseus +Hesse, 1866 by original monotypy. + + + + +Remarks. +Ooishi (2008c) +redescribed both sexes of the +type +species of +Mychçphẚlus +, +M +. +rçseus +Hesse and +M +. +palmatus +López-González & Conradi, 1996 +. Subsequently Kim I.H. and Moon (2011) added a fourth species, +M +. +capẚllatus +Kim I.H. & Moon, 2011. +Mychçphẚlus +has been characterized by the dorsally displaced anus positioned close to the level of genital apertures and by the lobate, unsegmented maxilla (Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +; +Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 +). +Mychçphẚlus +is closely related to +bnterçpsẚs +. Both genera share the same structure of the swimming legs and +MK capẚllatus +exhibits a +Mychçphẚlus +- +type +position of the anus combined with an +bnterçpsẚs +- +type +of maxilla, which is 2-segmented and bears a strong claw on the distal segment. +Mychçphẚlus capẚllatus +was tentatively included in +Mychçphẚlus +but its placement in this genus may need to be reviewed. Re-analysing of the relationships between these two genera will be facilitated by the discovery of the male of +bnterçpsẚs +, which is currently unknown. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEF3FEEFFA93F889D17B18B3.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEF3FEEFFA93F889D17B18B3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2b3b9ba57fe --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEF3FEEFFA93F889D17B18B3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Mychophilus notialis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 184 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21589) and +paratype +♀ +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21498) from +Bçtryllçẚdes magnẚcçecum +(Hartmeyer, 1912); Kommetjie, +Cape +Town, +South Africa +, intertidal, +Monniot +coll., + +05 February 1996 + +. + + + + + +FIG. 184. +Mychçphẚlus nçtẚalẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, left; B, cephalic appendages +ẚn sẚtu +, ventral; C, caudal ramus; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, labrum; G, maxillule; H, maxilla; I, leg 1; J, leg 4. Scale bars: A, 0.1 mm; B, I, J, 0.02 mm; C-H, 0.01 mm. + + + + +Etymology. +The name +nçtẚalẚs +is from the Latin, meaning “southern”, alluding to the location of the +type +locality in the +South Africa +. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 184A +) vermiform, cylindrical, unsegmented, recurved dorsally, consisting of cephalosome and trunk. Body length +1.63 mm +; maximum width 273 μm. Cephalosome defined from trunk by posterodorsal wrinkles. Genitoabdominal region longer than metasomal region; genital apertures positioned laterally at midlength of trunk. Anus located dorsally, positioned at level of insertion of leg 3. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 184C +) small, incompletely articulated from trunk, gradually narrowing distally, about 2.1 times longer than wide (40×19 μm), armed with 1 broad seta (12 μm long) at apex. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 184B +) as broad ridge connecting left and right antennules. Antennule ( +Fig. 184D +) small, 35μm long, 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment shorter and narrower than proximal segment, armed with 5 setae. Antenna ( +Fig. 184E +) 73 μm long, 2-segmented, tapering, unarmed; proximal segment with 2 rows of spinules on lateral surface; distal segment claw-like, with pointed apex and several rows of spinules. + + +Labrum broad, with transverse row of 6 transparent, broad, tongue-like elements on ventral surface; elements subequal in length, marginally spinulose distally. Mandible absent. Maxillule ( +Fig. 184G +) bilobed; larger inner lobe bearing 2 spinulose processes; smaller outer lobe bearing 3 spinulose processes (1 arising more proximally). Maxilla ( +Fig. 184H +) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment small, knob-like, tipped with 1 broad seta. Maxilliped absent. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 184I +) consisting of 2-segmented, unarmed protopod and rudimentary exopod and endopod. Proximal segment of protopod ornamented with several rows of spinules on anterior surface; distal segment with 2 or 3 rows of spinules on anterior surface. Exopod and endopod not articulated from protopod. Exopod sclerotized, clawlike, embedded in hyaline covering. Endopod fleshy, bearing 1 spiniform process on anterolateral surface. Legs 2, 3, and 4 ( +Fig. 184J +) as leg +1 in +form, but broader; exopod and endopod indistinctly articulated from distal segment of protopod. Legs 5 and 6 absent. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +In +Mychçphẚlus +the labrum and maxillule exhibit useful taxonomic characters. The labrum of +M +. +nçtẚalẚs +sp. nov. +bears 6 setiform processes. Only +M +. +palmatus +is known to have this number of processes on the labrum ( +López-González & Conradi, 1996 +). Both species also have a maxillule bearing 2 processes on the inner lobe and 3 processes on the outer lobe. However +M +. +nçtẚalẚs +sp. nov. +is easily distinguishable from +M +. +palmatus +, by having a 2-segmented antennule (cf. unsegmented in +M +. +palmatus +) and a 2-segmented antenna (cf. unsegmented in +M +. +palmatus +). The labrum is unknown in +M +. +fallax +, but this species is not confusable with +M +. +nçtẚalẚs +sp. nov. +as it has a slender body, an antennule bearing 2 spinules distally, an antenna bearing a slender terminal claw, and a maxillule (referred to as the “mandible” by +Stock, 1967 +) with a simple inner lobe. + + + +The maxillule of +M +. +nçtẚalẚs +sp. nov. +is armed with 2 processes on the inner lobe and 3 processes on the outer lobe as in +M +. +palmatus +and +M +. +rçseus +. The +type +species, + +MK +rçseus + +has bipartite caudal rami, 3 processes on the labrum, and 3-segmented antenna ( +Ooishi, 2008c +), and is therefore easy to distinguish from +M +. +nçtẚalẚs +sp. nov + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEF5FEE5FA93FB70D5EC1E2F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEF5FEE5FA93FB70D5EC1E2F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..842af7a8aa8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEF5FEE5FA93FB70D5EC1E2F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enteropsis obtusa + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 181 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21584), +5 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21585), and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17399) from +aẚstaplẚa cçrçlla +Monniot F. +, 1974 (MNHN-IT-2008-3694 = +MNHN +A3 +/ +DIS/35 +); +Guadeloupe +, +Baille Argent +face +Nord +, +Stn +83-20, depth + +1-3 m + +, +Monniot +coll., + +04 April 1983 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is derived from the Latin +çbtus +(=blunt), referring to the blunt posterior end of body. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 181A, B +) eruciform, stout, indistinctly 6-segmented, consisting of cephalosome, first to fourth pedigerous somites, and genitoabdomen. Mean body length 1.0 mm ( +0.78-1.17 mm +, n=7); dissected specimen +1.17 mm +; maximum width 393 μm (across third pedigerous somite). Cephalosome ( +Fig. 181C +) narrowing anteriorly, with rounded anterior margin; first to fourth pedigerous somites lacking dorsal tergites. Genitoabdomen wider than long; anal prominence (indicated by arrowhead in +Fig. 181B +) small; genital apertures positioned subdistally on same plane as anal prominence. Caudal rami and caudal setae absent. + + +Rostrum absent, but sclerotized longitudinal sculpture present in rostral area ( +Fig. 181C +). Antennule ( +Fig. 181D +) 55 μm long, narrowing distally, 3-segmented; first segment unarmed; second segment with 1 seta on posterior mar- gin; third segment slightly shorter than second, armed with 7 setae. Antenna ( +Fig. 181E +) 67 μm long, unarmed, consisting of spinulose basal segment and spinulose distal claw; claw 34 μm long, curved, as long as basal segment, with acutely pointed tip. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 181F +) spinulose, with convex posterior margin, 1 broad, triangular, tongue-like medial process and 2 densely spinulose setiform processes, 1 either side of medial process. Mandible absent. Maxillule ( +Fig. 181G +) distally bilobed; longer inner lobe tipped with 2 spinulose setae and densely covered with setules in distal half of lobe; shorter outer lobe tipped with 2 equal, spinulose setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 181H +) massive, 2-segmented; proximal segment with strongly protruding medial margin and 1 blunt tubercle near apex of medial protrusion; distal segment terminating in strong claw, with 1 small seta proximally on posterolateral surface and patch of fine granular ornamentation near base of seta. Maxilliped absent. + + + +FIG. 181. +bnterçpsẚs çbtusa +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, cephalosome, ventral; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, labrum; G, maxillule; H, maxilla; I, leg 1. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C, 0.05 mm; D-I, 0.02 mm. + + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 181I +) biramous with 2-segmented protopod; protopod spinulose on anterior surface. Rami rudimentary; exopod as conical claw, embedded in transparent covering; endopod wider than long, truncate. Legs 2-4 same as leg +1 in +form and structure. Leg 5 absent. Leg 6 not visible in genital aperture. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +bnterçpsẚs çbtusa +sp. nov. +can be clearly defined by its characteristic labrum which bears a broad, linguiform median process plus a pair of slender, setiform processes laterally. The caudal rami are absent in +b +. +çbtusa +sp. nov. +, as in four congeneric species ( +b +. +abbçttẚ +, +b +. +fusẚfçrmẚs +, +b +. +mẚnçr +, and +b +. +elçngata +sp. nov.) +. However, in +b +. +çbtusa +sp. nov. +the antennule is 3-segmented, in contrast to the 1-segmented condition in these congeners, and the inner and outer lobes of the maxillule are each tipped with 2 distinct, basally articulating setae, compared to the armature of the inner and outer lobes each bearing 2 setae and 2 cusps in +b +. +abbçttẚ +, 0 and 2 setae in +b +. +fusẚfçrmẚs +, 2 and 0 setae in +b +. +mẚnçr +, and 2 setae and 1 cusp in +b +. +elçngata +sp. nov. +The new species can be characterised by the combination of the armature of the labrum, the lack of caudal rami, the 3-segmented antennule, and the 2 setaebearing lobes of the maxillule. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEF7FEE3FA93FC29D1861CA0.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEF7FEE3FA93FC29D1861CA0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8bc0761bc56 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEF7FEE3FA93FC29D1861CA0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enteropsis tromsoensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 182 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21586) and +paratype +♀ +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21499) from +mçlycarpa fẚbrçsa +(Stimpson, 1852) (MNHN-IT-2008-6485 = +MNHN +S1 +/ +POL +.B/54); off +Tromsø +, +Norway +, +Norbi Cruise +, +RV +“Jean Charcot”, +Stn CP +11 ( +69°52’N +, +17°08’E +), depth + +250-300 m + +, +Bouchet +& +Warén +coll., + +01 July 1975 + +. + + + +Additional non-type material. +2 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21587, intact) in +mçlycarpa pçrculus +Monniot C. & Monniot F., 1979; collected at +type +locality on same date. + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is based on its +type +locality, Tromsø. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 182A +) eruciform, incompletely 7-segmented, consisting of cephalosome, first to fourth pedigerous somites, genital complex, and 1-segmented abdomen. Body length +2.23 mm +; maximum with 682 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalosome 360×490 μm, distinctly defined from first pedigerous somite; posterior part of body from second pedigerous somite narrowing posteriorly. Genital apertures positioned laterally on genital complex. Abdomen 250×290 μm, gradually narrowing posteriorly; anus opening dorsally; anal prominence and anal operculum absent ( +Fig. 182B +). Caudal rami ( +Fig. 182B +) tapering, about 2.9 times longer than wide (208×71 μm), with straight, sclerotized lateral margin and oblique medial margin, and tipped with 1 small spine (55 μm long). + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 182C +) broad, indistinctly 2-segmented, 70×50 μm; proximal segment un- armed; distal segment with 6 or 7 setae (3 setule-like and 2 with swollen articulated base); 1 small distal seta (indicated by arrowhead) present or absent. Antenna ( +Fig. 182D +) consisting of proximal segment and large distal claw; proximal segment 45 μm long, with 1 small cusp subdistally; distal claw (or claw-like distal segment) 50 μm long, slightly curved, unarmed. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 182E +) armed with 5 broad, spinulose, setiform processes along posterior margin, middle 3 processes about 33 μm in length and about 1.5 times longer than lateral 2. Mandible absent. Maxillule ( +Fig. 182F +) bilobed distally, with 5 elements on inner lobe and 3 elements on outer lobe, all elements ornamented with minute spinules; 5 elements of inner lobe consisting of 2 shorter processes and 3 slender setiform elements; elements on outer lobe all broad, blunt processes. Maxilla ( +Fig. 182G +) massive, 2-segmented; broad proximal segment bearing 1 sclerotized tubercle on protruding medial margin; distal segment terminating in strong claw, with 1 small seta proximally. Maxilliped absent. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 182H +) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed, with scattered minute spinules on anterior surface; distal segment bearing 1 claw (representing exopod) and 1 shorter, tapering, corrugated process (endopod). Legs 2-4 same as leg 1. Leg 5 absent. Leg 6 not visible. + + + +FIG. 182. +bnterçpsẚs trçmsçensẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, caudal rami, dorsal; C, antennule; D, antenna; E, labrum; F, maxillule; G, maxilla; H, leg 1. Scale bars: A, 0.5 mm; B, 0.1 mm; C-F, 0.02 mm; G, H, 0.05 mm. + + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +bnterçpsẚs trçmsçensẚs +sp. nov. +can be clearly defined by the characteristic armature of the labrum and maxillule. Its labrum is armed with 5 setiform processes along the free posterior margin. Although Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +recorded the presence of 5 or 6 “setae” on the labrum of +b +. +capẚtulata +, these elements were described as small, naked, and arranged along the anterior margin of the labrum. No other congeners are recorded as having 5 setae or processes on the labrum. The maxillule of +b +. +trçmsçensẚs +sp. nov. +is armed with 3 processes on the inner lobe and 5 processes on the outer lobe. The numbers of processes are extraordinary because they exceed the previously known maximum numbers, which are 2 on the inner lobe and 3 on the outer lobe (reported in five other species). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEFDFEEDFA93F995D7671EF3.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEFDFEEDFA93F995D7671EF3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..df3c47c453f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFEFDFEEDFA93F995D7671EF3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,186 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Mychophilus hesperius + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 185 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21590), +1 ♀ +paratype +(MNHN-IU-2014-21591), and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21485) from +Symplegma brakenhẚelmẚ +(Michaelsen, 1904) (MNHN-IT-2008-8440 = +MNHN +S1 +/ +SYM/12 +); Saint François, côte sud +de Grande Terre +, +Guadeloupe +, Stn 18 (dive from quay of fishing port), +Monniot +coll., + +25 December 1980 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Greek +hesper +(=western), referring to its collection from the West Indies. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 185A +) vermiform, cylindrical, unsegmented, curved dorsally. Body length +1.80 mm +; maximum width 327 μm (at level of leg 4). First to fourth pedigerous somites obscurely defined by weak lateral constrictions. Genital apertures positioned laterally at 70% of body length. Anus positioned dorsally at 60% of body length (between level leg 4 and genital apertures). Region of genitoabdomen gradually narrowing posteriorly. Posterior part of body ( +Fig. 185B, C +) lobate, bearing rudimentary caudal rami dorsally; each caudal ramus about 1.8 times longer than wide (9×5 μm), tipped with 1 small, broad seta, 9 μm long. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 185D +) small, 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment slightly shorter and narrower than proximal segment; armed with 5 setae (1 proximal, 2 subdistal, and 2 distal). Antenna ( +Fig. 185E +) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed, bearing 2 triangular processes at laterodistal corner; distal segment small, claw-like, obscurely articulated from proximal segment. + + + +FIG. 185. +Mychçphẚlus hesperẚus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, right; B, distal part of body, dorsal; C, distal part of body, right; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, labrum; G, maxillule; H, maxilla; I, leg 1. Scale bars: A, 0.2 mm; B, C, I, 0.02 mm; D-H, 0.01 mm. + + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 185F +) broad, bearing 4 spinulose processes (medial pair shorter than lateral pair). Mandible absent. Maxillule ( +Fig. 185G +) bilobed; longer inner lobe bearing 2 attenuated processes; shorter outer lobe bearing 1 broad, blunt process and 1 shorter, thin, setiform process. Maxilla ( +Fig. 185H +) lobate, bearing 2 lobules subdistally, medial lobule tipped with 1 small seta, and ornamented with 2 groups (4 proximal and 3 distal) of spinules on medial margin. Maxilliped absent. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 185I +) consisting of 2-segmented, unarmed protopod and rudimentary rami. Protopod ornamented with scattered spinules on anterior surface. Exopod claw-like, articulated from distal segment of protopod; endopod not articulated at base, fleshy, with blunt tip. Legs 2-4 same as leg 1. Legs 5 and 6 absent. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Mychçphẚlus hesperẚus +sp. nov. +can be differentiated from most of its congeners by the possession of 4 processes on the labrum. The exception is +M +. +fallax +, for which the labrum is unknown. However, +MK fallax +is not confusable with the new species because it carries a simple inner lobe and has 3 setiform elements on the outer lobe of the maxillule, and has an unsegmented maxilla ( +Stock, 1967 +). +Mychçphẚlus hesperẚus +sp. nov. +bears 2 processes on the inner and outer lobes of the maxillule. This is a unique feature of +M +. +hesperẚus +sp. nov. +, which alone serves to characterize the species. + + +Discussion +. Prior to this study, these four families collectively contained a total of 118 valid species classified in 15 recognized genera ( +Walter & Boxshall, 2020 +). Here we have added five new genera and 84 new species, taking the totals to 20 and 202, respectively. In common with previous studies of archinotodelphyid ( +Kim & Boxshall, 2020a +) and notodelphyid copepods ( +Kim & Boxshall, 2020b +) from the Monniot collection, this represents a dramatic increase in the documented species richness of the families. All three of these papers serve to emphasise the enormous gaps in our knowledge of the parasites and symbionts of marine invertebrate hosts. In order to better quantify the diversity of marine ecosystems and better understand energy flow through these systems, considerably more effort must be invested in collecting and describing symbiotic species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF01FF10FA93FC3DD0161CFB.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF01FF10FA93FC3DD0161CFB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c406a3cbcdb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF01FF10FA93FC3DD0161CFB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola sulcatus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 150 +, +151 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21559) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21476) from + +Apl +ẚdẚum nadaense + +(Nishikawa, 1980) (MNHN-IT-2008-576 = +MNHN +A1 +/ +APL +.B/407); +Papua New Guinea +, +Louisiades Archipelago +, +Calvados Islands +, +Channel +E of Brooker +I., + +Site +Brooker +Channel + +, +OCDN 5743 +-A, ( +11°03.09’S +, +152°28.62’E +), depth + +7 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +01 June 1998 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +sulc +(=a furrow), alluding to the presence of a longitudinal furrow on the endopods of legs 1-4. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 150 +A-C) eruciform, consisting of cephalosome, trunk, and genitoabdomen. Body length +1.24 mm +; maximum width 373 μm (across fourth pedigerous somite). Cephalic shield distinctly narrower than trunk (177×223 μm), with distinct posterior margin. Trunk gradually broadening posteriorly, unseg- mented; first to fourth pedigerous somites each bearing dorsal tergite; first pedigerous somite completely covered by tergite, but second to fourth pedigerous somites partly covered by tergite; tergites on second and third pedigerous somites with incomplete posterior margin, thus forming dorsolateral tergal folds. First to fourth pedigerous somites each bearing pair of ventral interpodal protrusions between left and right legs; each protrusion tipped with nippleshaped knob ( +Fig. 150B +, +151 +A-D). Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 150D +) directed slightly posteroventrally ( +Fig. 150C +), dorsally unsegmented, but ventrally 4-segmented; anal prominence large. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 150E +) tapering, 1.75 times longer than wide (63×36 μm), with straight lateral margin, convex medial margin, blunt apex; armed with 1 small seta (19 μm long) subdistally on medial margin. Egg sac containing 6 to +8 eggs +in 2 rows; each egg relatively large, about 160 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 150G +) about 58×45 μm, obscurely 2-segmented; proximal segment broad, armed with 4 setae (2 on convex posterior margin and 2 distally); distal segment shorter and much narrower than proximal segment, armed with 3 setae (2 on posterior margin and 1 on apex). Antenna ( +Fig. 150H +) unsegmented, lacking any trace of articulation, approximately 89×41 μm, armed with 6 naked setae (1 on medial margin, 2 on lateral margin and 3 on distal margin); setae II-VI longer than width of segment; lengths of setae I-VI 16, 45, 45, 54, 61, and 75 μm, respectively. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 150I +) with patches of spinules on ventral surface; palp densely spinulose, gradually broadening distally. Mandible ( +Fig. 150J +) tapering, spinulose, distinctly narrower than labral palp. Maxillular precoxa ( +Fig. 150K +) with excavated apex, 2 processes subdistally, and endite in middle tipped with 1 spinulose spine and about 15 stiff setules; palp ( +Fig. 150L +) armed with 6 thick spines, 5 on distal margin and 1 on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 150M +) 2-segmented; proximal segment bearing 1 small tubercle proximally on medial margin and 1 spinulose, basally articulated element on mediodistal endite; distal segment bifurcate and spinulose distally, with 1 small seta on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + + +FIG. 150. +bnterçcçla sulcatus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, habitus, right; D, genitoabdomen, dorsal; E, caudal rami, dorsal; F, egg sac; G, antennule; H, antenna; I, labrum; J, mandible; K, precoxa of maxillule; L, palp of maxillule; M, maxilla. Scale bars: A-C, F, 0.1 mm; D, 0.05 mm; E, H, 0.02 mm; G, I-M, 0.01 mm. + + + + +FIG. 151. +bnterçcçla sulcatus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 2; C, leg 3; D, leg 4; E, leg 5. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. + + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 151 +A-D) each consisting of coxa, basis, and unsegmented rami; coxae unarmed; basis characteristically bearing digitiform laterodistal process tipped with minute seta. Exopods of legs 2-4 bearing patch of spinules proximally on lateral margin. Endopods marked by longitudinal furrow along lateral surface, receiving tip of exopods. Sizes of endopods 46×26, 52×26, 48×27, and 46×27 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Laterodistal and mediodistal setae distinctly longer than endopodal segments, setal lengths 94 and 85, 105 and 81, 94 and 81, and 101 and 87 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Laterodistal setae 1.1, 1.3, 1.2, and 1.2 times longer than mediodistal setae, respectively, in legs 1-4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 151E +) more than twice as wide as long (90×188 μm), bearing 2 small setae on distal margin, sepa- rated by distance of 125 μm. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks +. +bnterçcçla sulcatus + +sp. nov. + +can be recognized by the following outstanding features: (1) the paired ventral interpodal protrusions on the first to fourth pedigerous somites are tipped with a nipple-shaped knob; (2) in legs 1-4, the basis bears a digitiform laterodistal process; and (3) the endopods of legs 1-4 each bear a longitudinal furrow along the lateral surface. These three features are as yet unknown elsewhere in +bnterçcçla +and, therefore, serve to characterize the new species. + + +An additional diagnostic feature of +b +. +sulcatus + +sp. nov. + +is the armature of a single seta on the caudal rami. This feature is shared with three other known species, +b +. +ẚnathẚnus +, +b +. +latẚceps +, and +b +. +setẚcaudus +sp. nov. +Of these, +b +. +setẚcaudus +sp. nov. +is the most similar to +b +. +sulcatus + +sp. nov. + +in sharing the same basic body form and the setation patterns of the antennule, antenna, and swimming legs. However, none of these congeners exhibits any of the three features highlighted above. We also note that +b +. +setẚcaudus +sp. nov. +differs from +b +. +sulcatus + +sp. nov. + +in other morphological details, for example, the caudal seta is positioned at apex of the caudal ramus, and the mediodistal process of first maxillary segment is bifurcate unlike that of +b +. +sulcatus + +sp. nov. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF02FF1DFA93FE5DD5081ED7.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF02FF1DFA93FE5DD5081ED7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d92448a7d7f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF02FF1DFA93FE5DD5081ED7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,343 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola neocaledonicus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 152 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21560), +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21561), and +2 ♀♀ +para- types (dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21477) from +aẚdemnum lẚgulum +Monniot F. +, 1983; +Goelands I. +, +New Caledonia +, +Stn NC +47, depth + +12 m + +, +Thomassin +coll., + +20 March 1987 + +. + + + +Additional non-type material. + +10 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21562) in +a +. +lẚgulum +; anse +Vata +, +Nouméa +, +New Caledonia +, +Stn NC +60, depth + +0-3m + +, +Monniot +coll., + +27 March 1987 + + +. + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is derived from its +type +locality, +New Caledonia +. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 152A, B +) eruciform, curved dorsally; body length 790 μm in dissected specimen and 556, 691, and 760 μm in 3 other measured specimens; maximum width 260 μm (across first pediger- ous somite). Cephalic shield 142×233 μm, with well-defined posterior margin. Trunk unsegmented, gradually nar- rowing posteriorly; first pedigerous somite bearing dorsal tergite, but second to fourth pedigerous somites bearing well-developed dorsolateral tergal folds. Third pedigerous somite bearing small tubercle mid-dorsally (indicated by arrowhead in +Fig. 152A, B +) between left and right dorsolateral tergal folds. First to fourth pedigerous somites each with single, ventral interpodal protrusion between left and right legs, weak in first and second pedigerous somites but well-developed in third and fourth pedigerous somites. Genitoabdomen dorsally unsegmented and ventrally 4-segmented; anal somite with distinct anal prominence. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 152D +) fusiform, unarmed, distinctly articulated from anal somite, about 2.07 times longer than wide (58×28 μm), widest in middle. Egg sac ( +Fig. 152E +) containing 5 or +6 eggs +; each egg 138 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 152F +) unsegmented, about 1.6 times longer than wide (48×30 μm), with straight anterior margin and strongly protruded posterior margin; armed with 4 small setae on apex (grouped as 2 and 2). Antenna ( +Fig. 152G +) incompletely 2-segmented, about 100 μm long, 52 μm wide; proximal segment un- armed; distal segment as long as proximal segment, ornamented with spinules on concave surface; armed with 6 setae, lengths of setae I-VI (medial to lateral) 14, 15, 11, 15, 20, and 31 μm, respectively; all setae curved medially; 3 medial setae (setae I-III) widely separated from other setae. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 152H +) with 3 small patches of spinules on each side of ventral surface; palp gradually inflating distally. Mandible tapering, less than half as wide as labral palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa ( +Fig. 152J +) and palp ( +Fig. 152I +); distal sclerotized region of precoxa with 2 small tubercles (subdistal and proximal) and spinulecovered distal margin; endite of precoxa tipped with 1 spinulose spine and more than 20 setules; palp with 5 spines on distal margin and 1 naked seta on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 152K +) bearing spinulose process on endite of proximal segment; distal segment with 1 spinulose, spiniform process on subdistal anterior surface, 1 transverse row of minute spinules in middle of anterior surface, and 1 small seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of 2-segmented protopod and unsegmented rami ( +Fig. 152L, M +); protopods unarmed. Exopods bearing patch of minute spinules proximally on lateral margin; exopods of legs 1, 2, and 4 tipped with small cusp; exopods of legs 1 and 2 with minute cusp subdistally on lateral margin ( +Fig. 152L +). Endopods 43×20, 45×20, 40×21, and 33×20 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae 38 and 32, 42 and 34, 42 and 31, and 46 and 36 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 152N +) unarmed, wider than long (109×190 μm). + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +FIG. 152. +bnterçcçla neçcaledçnẚcus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, genitoabdomen, left; D, caudal ramus; E, egg sac; F, antennule; G, antenna; H, labrum; I, palp of maxillule; J, precoxa of maxillule; K, maxilla; L, leg 1; M, leg 3; N, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, E, 0.1 mm; C, N, 0.05 mm; D, G, K-M, 0.02 mm; F, H-J, 0.01 mm. + + + + +FIG. 153. +bnterçcçla nçdulçsus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, habitus, right; D, genitoabdomen, ventral; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum and mandibles; H, precoxa of maxillule; I, palp of maxillule; J, maxilla; K, leg 5. Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm; D, K, 0.05 mm; E-J, 0.02 mm. + + + + +Remarks. +The antennule of +bK neçcaledçnẚcus +sp. nov. +is armed with 4 setae. Similar numbers of setae (3-5 setae) on the antennule are observable in more than 15 known species of +bnterçcçla +( +Table 6 +). Seven of these species are similar to +b +. +neçcaledçnẚcus +sp. nov. +, because they share the same unsegmented, bulbous shaped antennule, which is circular or semicircular (D-shaped). These seven species are +b +. +parapterçphçrus +, +b +. +mabulensẚs +sp. nov. +, +b +. +dẚcaudatus +, +b +. +mammẚferus +, +b +. +rçbustus +sp. nov +., +b +. +parvus + +sp. nov. + +, and + +b +. +angustus + + +sp. nov. + +The first two of these, +b +. +parapterçphçrus +and +b +. +mabulensẚs +sp. nov. +, can be excluded from further comparison because both have 5 setae on the antenna, whereas +b +. +neçcaledçnẚcus +sp. nov. +has 6 setae. + + +The remaining five species can be distinguished from +b +. +neçcaledçnẚcus +sp. nov. +as follows: +bK dẚcaudatus +has, unlike +b +. +neçcaledçnẚcus +sp. nov. +, an elongate antenna and a posterodorsal process on the cephalic shield; +bK mammẚferus +has caudal rami which are wider than long (in contrast to about twice as long as wide in +b +. +neçcaledçnẚcus +sp. nov. +). In +bK rçbustus +sp. nov. +there are 3 setae on the antennule, the narrow caudal rami are 3.0 times longer than wide, and the endopods of swimming legs are 2-segmented, although the segmentation is incomplete. +bnterçcçla parvus + +sp. nov. + +differs in having 3 setae on the antennule, a dorsal tubercle on the first and second pedigerous somites, and a spinulose tubercle on the medial margin of the proximal maxillary segment. Finally, +bK angustus + +sp. nov. + +has 5 setae on the antennule, tapering caudal rami, and a bifurcate process on the endite of the proximal maxillary segment. + + +The third pedigerous somite of +b +. +neçcaledçnẚcus +sp. nov. +bears a small dorsal tubercle, although it is easy to overlook because of its small size. The presence of a dorsal tubercle or process on the cephalic shield or on any pedigerous somites is known for +b +. +dẚcaudatus +(on the cephalic shield), +b +. +quadrẚsetus +sp. nov. +(on the second and third pedigerous somites), +b +. +parvus + +sp. nov. + +(on the first and second pedigerous somites), and + +b +. +tuberculatus + + +sp. nov. + +(on the first pedigerous somite). The presence of a tubercle on the third pedigerous somite only is unique within the genus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF07FF15FA93FF10D5781ACB.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF07FF15FA93FF10D5781ACB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..23a546cab6f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF07FF15FA93FF10D5781ACB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola sedentarius + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 148 +, +149 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21558) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21475) from +eypçdẚstçma deerratum +(Sluiter, 1895); +Papua New Guinea +, +CRRF +coll. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species reflects its sedentary body form. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 148 +A-C) small, curved dorsally, appearing posteriorly truncated sedentary in lateral view ( +Fig. 148C +). Body length 522 μm; maximum width 230 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalic shield distinct from first pedigerous somite, 133×161 μm. Trunk obscurely segmented ( +Fig. 148C +), but somites distinctly defined by deep lateral constrictions. First to fourth pedigerous somites each with well-developed tergite dorsally; tergite of first pedigerous somite simple, but those of second to fourth pedigerous somites forming paired posterolateral tergal folds ( +Fig. 148A +). First to fourth pedigerous somites each with single mid-ventral interpodal protrusion ( +Fig. 148B +). Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 148D +) unsegmented, much wider than long in lateral view; anal prominence large ( +Fig. 148D +). Caudal rami ( +Fig. 148E +) originating close to each other, directed ventrally, arising on ventral margin of genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 148D +) but not articulated at base, about 1.8 times longer than wide (25×14 μm); armed with 2 or 3 minute setae. Egg sac containing 5 or +6 eggs +; each egg 145 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 148G +) 40×25 μm, unsegmented, but distinctly divisible into broad proximal part and short, narrow distal part; proximal part armed with 4 setae distally and 1 small tubercle subdistally; distal part occupying 20% length of antennule, armed with 3 setae on distal margin. Antenna ( +Fig. 148H +) incompletely 2- segmented, about 2.1 times longer than wide; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment armed with 6 large setae, lengths of setae I-VI (medial to lateral) increasing 19, 32, 34, 36, 48, and 61 μm, respectively; setae IV-VI longer than width of segment at tip. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 148I +) broad with convex lateral margins, ornamented with patches of minute spinules on ventral surface; palp spinulose, curved laterally, with narrow proximal quarter and moderately expanded distal three-quarters. Mandible spinulose, narrower than labral palp. Precoxa ( +Fig. 148J +) of maxillule with bifurcate apex, and endite bearing slender, spinulose spine and more than 10 thin spinules; palp ( +Fig. 148K +) armed with 6 subequal spinulose spines along convex distal margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 148L +) 2-segmented; proximal segment bearing 1 smooth tubercle proximally on medial margin and mediodistal endite tipped with spinulose element; distal segment smooth, tapering, with 1 tubercle on anterior surface and 1 seta on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of 2-segmented protopod (coxa and basis) and unsegmented rami ( +Fig. 149A, B +); basis with outer seta. Exopods with proximal patch of spinules on lateral margin. Endopods less than twice as long as wide, 31×21, 31×20, 31×18, and 25×15 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Distal setae on endopods distinctly longer than endopodal segments. Laterodistal and mediodistal setae 67 and 59, 71 and 56, 42 and 42, and 40 and 33 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Laterodistal setae distinctly longer than mediodistal setae in legs 1, 2, and 4, but equal in length in leg 3. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 149C +) more than twice as wide as long (63×150 μm); armed with 2 minute setae on distal margin; separated by distance of 87 μm. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The posteriorly-truncated body, with its ventrally directed abdomen, is an extraordinary body form for the genus +bnterçcçla +, and serves to characterize +bK sedentarẚus +sp. nov. +In addition, about half of known congeneric species have a laterodistal seta on the endopod of leg 1 that is as long as or longer than the endopodal segment, but in none of these is the laterodistal seta more than twice as long as the endopodal segment as in +b +. +sedentarẚus +sp. nov. + + +The caudal rami of +b +. +sedentarẚus +sp. nov. +are armed with 2 or 3 setae. Although the setae are minute, this feature is remarkable because caudal rami of +bnterçcçla +species that are known to be setiferous, i.e. +b +. +ẚanthẚnus +, +b +. +latẚceps +, and +b +. +setẚcaudus +sp. nov. +, only ever have a single caudal seta. The antennules of +b +. +sedentarẚus +sp. nov. +are armed with 7 setae ( +Table 6 +). This setation is shared with three known species, +b +. +sydnẚẚ +, +b +. +setẚcaudus +sp. nov. +, and +b +. +australẚs +sp. nov. +but none of these species shares the ventrally-directed abdomen that is diagnostic for +b +. +sedentarẚus +sp. nov. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF09FF1BFA93FE15D7FE1AAF.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF09FF1BFA93FE15D7FE1AAF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..640cb92199f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF09FF1BFA93FE15D7FE1AAF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola oligosetosus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 155 +, +156 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21564), +3 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21565), and +1 ♀ +para- type (dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21478) from +aẚdemnum +sp.; +Guadeloupe +, +Îlet +aux +Pigeons +, +Stn +20, depth + +5-12 m + +, +Monniot +coll., + +27 December 1980 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species refers to the presence of a single seta on the endopod of leg 4. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 155 +A-C) eruciform, curved dorsally; body length 968 μm in largest dissect- ed specimen; maximum width 386 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalosome clearly defined, 168×263 μm, distinctly narrower than trunk. Trunk inflated, unsegmented, but 4 anterior pedigerous somites defined by lateral constrictions between them; first to third pedigerous somites bearing small dorsolateral tergal folds; fourth pedigerous somite narrower than anterior pedigerous somites, bearing dorsal tergite. Ventral interpodal protrusions absent. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 155D +) gradually narrowing posteriorly, 5-segmented; articulations obscure dorsally; articulation between last 2 somites incomplete. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 155E +) tapering, incompletely articulated from anal somite, about 1.85 times longer than wide (76×41 μm), blunt distally; armed with 1 weakly pinnate, dorsal seta at 70% of ramus length; seta length 44 μm, more than half length of ramus. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 155F +) incompletely 2-segmented, about 76×40 μm, with inflated proximal two-thirds and narrow distal third; proximal segment with convex posterior margin armed with 3 setae (1 subdistal and 2 distal); distal segment small, 11×7 μm, rectangular, armed with 4 setae on distal margin. Antenna ( +Fig. 155G +) elongate, about 2.7 times longer than wide (145×54 μm), unsegmented, and ornamented with several patches of minute spinules on concave surface; armed with 5 unequal setae, lengths of setae (medial to lateral) 19, 9, 9, 45, and 41 μm, respectively; setae II and III small, close to each other and positioned at mediodistal corner, both setae widely separated from seta I and setae IV and V; seta IV and V distinctly larger than other setae, originating close to each other, positioned at laterodistal corner. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 155H +) with 2 patches of minute spinules on each side of ventral surface; palp densely spinulose, gradually expanded distally. Mandible ( +Fig. 155H +) spinulose, about half as wide as labral palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa ( +Fig 156A +) and palp ( +Fig. 156B +); precoxa with bifurcate distal part, 1 subdistal tubercle, and endite tipped with 1 seta, (proximally plumose and distally spinulose); palp with 5 spinulose setae on distal margin and 1 naked seta on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 155I +) 2-segmented; proximal segment with bifurcate mediodistal process bearing fine spinules distally; distal segment bifurcate distally, with 1 small seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of unarmed, 2-segmented protopod and unsegmented rami ( +Fig. 156 +C-E). Exopods with 3 patches of minute spinules along lateral margin. Endopods of legs 1-3 armed with 2 setae distally, but endopod of leg 4 armed with 1 seta distally (in 1 of 5 examined specimens, endopods of legs 2-4 armed with 1 seta), all setae weakly pinnate. Endopodal segments 59×30, 64×31, 64×30, and 58×33 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae 59 and 42, 66 and 41, and 68 and 41 μm, respectively, in legs 1-3. Length of distal seta on leg 4 endopod 68 μm. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 155J +) unarmed, wider than long (98×180 μm). + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +This new species is very easily distinguishable from all of its congeners by the possession of a single seta on the endopod of leg 4. The combination of three other character states, the caudal ramus is armed with 1 seta, the antenna is elongate and armed with 5 setae, and the distal setae on the endopods of all swimming legs are pinnate, provides additional evidence supporting the establishment of the new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF0BFF07FA93FBC3D60A1F83.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF0BFF07FA93FBC3D60A1F83.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9d02e6da65d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF0BFF07FA93FBC3D60A1F83.xml @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola curticaudus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 157 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21566), +7 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21567), and +2 ♀♀ +para- types (dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21479) from +Trẚdẚdemnum +sp.; +Florida +, +United States of America +, +C. Young +coll. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name of the new species is derived from Latin +curt +(=short) and +caud +(=the tail), referring to its short genitoabdomen. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 157A, B +) eruciform, slightly curved dorsally; body length 633 μm; maximum width 275 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalosome wider than long (120×200 μm), dorsally well-defined from trunk. Trunk unsegmented, with weak lateral constrictions between somites; third and fourth pedigerous somites with paired tergal folds dorsally. Ventral interpodal protrusions absent between left and right legs. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 157C +) short, semicircular, unsegmented, wider than long, lacking anal prominence. Caudal rami not expressed, but pair of small caudal setae (setule-like and 22 μm long) present subdistally on lateral margins of genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 157C +). + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 157E +) obscurely 2-segmented, 60×28 μm, strongly tapering from broad proximal two-thirds towards narrow distal third; proximal segment with 2 small setae on posterior margin; distal segment narrow, about one-third as long as proximal segment, armed with 5 setae, distal seta larger than other setae, but not articulated from segment. Antenna ( +Fig. 157F +) about 2.5 times longer than wide (100×40 μm), indistinctly 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment as long as proximal segment, and ornamented with several rows of minute spinules on concave surface; armed with 5 setae, lengths of setae 9, 16, 16, 28, and 33 μm, respectively; setae II and III positioned at mediodistal corner, and setae IV and V at laterodistal corner. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 157G +) with small patch of spinules near base of palp; palp inflated distally, bulbous. Mandible ( +Fig. 157G +) rudimentary, reduced to small digitiform process, about one-third as long as labral palp. Maxillule as usual for genus; endite of precoxa tipped with 1 spinulose seta and numerous setules ( +Fig. 157H +); palp ( +Fig. 157I +) with 5 spines on distal margin and 1 seta on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 155J +) with unarticulated, spinulose mediodistal process on proximal segment; distal segment bluntly bifurcate and smooth distally, with 1 small seta on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + + +FIG. 157. +bnterçcçla curtẚcaudus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, genitoabdomen, right; D, egg sac; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum and mandibles; H, precoxa of maxillule; I, palp of maxillule; J, maxilla; K, leg 1; L, leg 3; M, leg 4; N, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, D, 0.1 mm; C, N, 0.05 mm; E-M, 0.02 mm. + + + +Legs 1-4 biramous, with unarmed, incompletely 2-segmented protopods ( +Fig. 157 +K-M). Exopods of legs 1-3 with patch of minute spinules proximally on lateral margin. Endopods 62×25, 57×25, 50×21, and 41×21 μm, respec- tively, in legs 1-4, incompletely 2-segmented in legs 1-3, but unsegmented in leg 4. Laterodistal and mediodistal setae distinctly shorter than endopodal segments, 41 and 29, 32 and 17, 22 and 15, and 18 and 6 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4, becoming shorter from anterior to posterior legs. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 157N +) unarmed, lamellate, wider than long (98×162 μm). + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The absence of caudal rami is shared with only three known species of +bnterçcçla +, +b +. +mçnnẚçtẚ +, +b +. +adnatus +, and +b +. +cçnẚculus +but the new species can be easily differentiated from these congeners by the presence of a caudal seta, since all of these species lack caudal setae. There are additional differences: +b +. +mçnnẚçtẚ +has 6 setae on the antenna (cf. 5 setae in +bK curtẚcaudus +sp. nov. +) and a 3-segmented endopod of leg 1 (cf. incompletely 2-segmented); +b +. +adnatus +has unsegmented endopods of legs 1-3 (cf. incompletely 2-segmented); and +b +. +cçnẚculus +has 2 setae on the antennule (cf. +5 in +b +. +curtẚcaudus +sp. nov. +) and 6 setae on the antenna (cf. 5 setae). These differences are sufficient to distinguish the new species. The mandible of +b +. +curtẚcaudus +sp. nov. +is rudimentary, which is an unusual feature within the genus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF0FFF1BFA93FC71D1741C30.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF0FFF1BFA93FC71D1741C30.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..64244b0cf03 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF0FFF1BFA93FC71D1741C30.xml @@ -0,0 +1,277 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola nodulosus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 153 +, +154 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21563, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +budẚstçma +sp.; +Indonesia +, no other collection data. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species alludes to the presence of a distal nodule on the endopods of the swimming legs. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 153 +A-C) eruciform, curved dorsally; body length 909 μm; maximum width 350 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalosome with convex posterodorsal margin. Trunk unsegmented, but pedigerous somites defined from one another by dorsal and lateral constrictions; second to fourth pedigerous somites each bearing pair of dorsal tergal folds ( +Fig. 153A, C +) and single, large, plate-like ventral interpodal protrusion between left and right legs ( +Fig. 153B +). Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 153D +) unsegmented dorsally but 4-segmented ventrally; segmentation indistinct between genital and first free abdominal somites. Free abdominal somites covered with ornamentation of minute spinules on all surfaces; anal prominence distinct. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 153D +) straight, incompletely articulated from anal somite, gradually narrowing distally, unarmed, about 2.6 times longer than wide (100×38 μm). + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 153E +) leaf-like, 39×27 μm, inflated posteriorly, with convex posterior margin; armed with 5 small, subequal setae at apex. Antenna ( +Fig. 153F +) about 2.6 times longer than wide, incompletely 2- segmented, slightly curved medially; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment ornamented with minute spinules on convex surface; armed with 6 thin setae, lengths of setae I-VI 20, 18, 23, 19, 32, and 64 μm, respectively; seta I naked, but other 5 setae weakly pinnate; setae I-III widely separated from setae IV-VI. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 153G +) with spinulose, distally swollen palps. Mandible ( +Fig. 153G +) spinulose, tapering, narrower than labral palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa ( +Fig. 153H +) and palm-shaped palp ( +Fig. 153I +); precoxa with bifurcate distal part, 1 small tubercle subdistally, and endite in middle bearing 1 spinulose seta and more than 20 thin spinules; palp with 6 spinulose spines. Maxilla ( +Fig. 153J +) with bifurcate, spinulose mediodistal process on proximal segment; distal segment with 1 robust, basally articulated, spinulose spine subdistally, 1 transverse row of minute spinules on middle of anterior surface, and 1 small seta on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of unarmed, 2-segmented protopod and unsegmented rami. Exopods bearing patch of spinules proximally on lateral margin (( +Fig. 154 +A-C). Endopods armed distally with 2 naked setae and 1 nodule. Sizes of endopods 55×25, 55×24, 55×32, and 48×27 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4; endopods of legs 3 and 4 with markedly protruded lateral margin. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae 56 and 50, 55 and 43, 55 and 40, and 58 and 39 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Laterodistal setae longer than or as long as endopodal segments and about 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 times longer than mediodistal setae in legs 1-4, respectively. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 153K +) lamellate, unarmed, much wider than long (129×255 μm). + + + +FIG. 154. +bnterçcçla nçdulçsus +sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 3; C, leg 4. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +bnterçcçla nçdulçsus +sp. nov. +is characterized by the presence of a nodule (small tubercle) distally on the endopods of swimming legs 1 to 4. In addition, the unsegmented antennule of the new species is inflated and leaf-like. This form of the antennule (bulbous or D-shaped) is shared with ten known species of +bnterçcçla +( +Table 6 +). Interestingly, in species with this form of antennule, the body is small (mostly less than 1.0 mm long), and the laterodistal setae on the endopods of swimming legs are shorter than endopodal segments but as long as or longer than the mediodistal setae. Six of those species ( +b +. +parapterçphçrus +, +b +. +dẚcaudatus +, +b +. +quadrẚsetus +sp. nov. +, +b +. +mabulensẚs +sp. nov. +, +b +. +parvus + +sp. nov. + +, and +b +. +neçcaledçnẚcus +sp. nov. +) can be eliminated from further comparison because they have fewer than 6 setae on the antenna (cf. 6 setae in +b +. +nçdulçsus +sp. nov. +), or 1 or 2 dorsal tubercles or processes on the cephalosome or pedigerous somites (cf. lacking in +b +. +nçdulçsus +sp. nov. +). + + +The remaining four species ( +b +. +mammẚferus +, +b +. +pterçphçrus +, +b +. +rçbustus +sp. nov. +, and + +b +. +angustus + + +sp. nov. + +) can be distinguished from the new species as follows: in +b +. +mammẚferus +the caudal rami are wider than long (cf. about 2.6 times longer than wide in +b +. +nçdulçsus +sp. nov. +), the antennule is armed with 4 setae (cf. 5 setae), the 6 setae on the antenna are subequal in length (cf. setae unequal), and the 2 distal setae on the endopods of legs 1-4 are almost equal in length, as described or illustrated by +Ooishi (2010b) +. In +b +. +pterçphçrus +(as redescribed above), the ventral interpodal protrusion is absent on the pedigerous somites (cf. present, large in second to fourth pedigerous somites of +b +. +nçdulçsus +sp. nov. +), the lateral seta (seta VI) of the antenna is 34 μm long, distinctly shorter than that of +b +. +nçdulçsus +sp. nov. +(cf. 64 μm long), the labral palp is less expanded, and the mediodistal element of the proximal maxillary segment is articulated at base and simple, not bifurcate. In +b +. +rçbustus +sp. nov. +the antennule is armed with 3 setae ((cf. 5 setae in +b +. +nçdulçsus +sp. nov. +), the mediodistal element of the proximal maxillary segment is simple, not bifurcate, the setae on the antenna are shorter, the longest lateral seta (seta VI) is only 22 μm long (cf. 64 μm long), and the distal setae on the endopods of legs 1-4 are distinctly shorter than endopodal segments (cf. the setae are equal or subequal in length to endopodal segments in +b +. +nçdulçsus +sp. nov. +). Finally, in + +b +. +angustus + + +sp. nov. + +the caudal rami are strongly tapering and about 1.9 times longer than wide (cf. about 2.6 times longer than wide in +b +. +nçdulçsus +sp. nov. +), the longest lateral seta (seta VI) of the antenna is 29 μm long (cf. 64 μm long), the ventral interpodal protrusions on pedigerous somites are obscure, weakly developed (cf. large and well developed), and the distal setae on the endopods of legs 1-4 are distinctly shorter than endopodal segment (cf. as long as or longer). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF12FF00FA93FF10D69A1AAF.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF12FF00FA93FF10D69A1AAF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1357a25035f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF12FF00FA93FF10D69A1AAF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocolides elongatus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 163 +, +164 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21573, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +aẚstaplẚa +sp.; +Red Sea +coast of +Israel +, 1962. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species refers to its elongate body. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 163 +A-C) vermiform, cylindrical, curved dorsally; body length +1.58 mm +; maximum width 292 μm (across fourth pedigerous somite). Cephalosome wider than long (154×192 μm), narrower than trunk, indistinctly articulated from trunk. Trunk unsegmented, gradually broadening posteriorly; first to fourth pedigerous somites defined from one another by weak lateral constrictions, each somite with pair of distinct tergal folds dorsolaterally ( +Fig. 163A +) and pair of large, lobate ventral protrusions ( +Fig. 163B +). First and second pedigerous somites ornamented with rows of minute spinules on dorsal surface ( +Fig. 163A +). Genitoabdomen short, slightly longer than wide, unsegmented, not articulated from trunk, with copulatory pore ventrally and small anal prominence dorsally. Caudal rami very small, widely separated from each other; each ramus ( +Fig. 163D +) about 1.8 times longer than wide (33×18 μm), unarmed, with parallel lateral margins and rounded distal margin. + + +Rostrum not developed. Antennule ( +Fig. 163E +) tapering, about 65 μm long, incompletely 3-segmented, not articulated at base, but with sclerotized band at base; first segment with 1 small seta anterodistally and several blunt spinules in middle; second segment short with 2 setae on anterior margin; third segment with 5 setae, largest terminal seta process-like, not articulated at base. Antenna ( +Fig. 163F +) lamellate, unsegmented, longer than wide, and ornamented with scattered rows of minute spinules on anterior and posterior surfaces; armed with 5 naked setae (4 distal and 1 subdistal). + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 163G +) with convex posterior margin, ornamented with 3 groups of minute spinules on each side of ventral surface; with pair of narrow, spinulose palps. Mandible small, similar to labral palp. Maxillule ( +Fig. 163H +) biramous, consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa ( +Fig. 163I +) terminating in spiniform process, with endite tipped with 1 spinulose spine and several spinules encircling spine, and armed with 2 spinulose spines near base of process; palp ( +Fig. 163J +) bearing 4 spinulose spines on distal margin and 1 slender, naked seta on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 163K +) 2-segmented; proximal segment with strongly projecting mediodistal corner tipped with robust, spinulose spine; distal segment armed with 2 naked spines (1 distal and 1 subdistal) and 1 strong naked seta on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 164 +A-D) each consisting of unarmed 2-segmented protopod and unsegmented rami. Proximal segment (coxa) of protopod short, indistinct, ornamented with several rows of minute spinules. Exopods of legs 1 and 2 terminating in spiniform process and 1 small, claw-like spine subdistally on lateral margin. Lengths of exopods 40, 45, 58, and 38 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4; exopod of leg 3 ( +Fig. 164C +) attenuated, acutely pointed distally; exopod of leg 4 tipped with 1 small spine ( +Fig. 164D +). Endopods of legs 1-4 as large, flattened, laterally curved, tapering element, sclerotized along medial margin, acutely pointed distally in legs 1-3, but with blunt tip in leg 4. Sizes of endopods 102×29, 173×33, 179×38, and 147×36 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 164E +) lamellate, wider than long, with obliquely rounded ventral margin and straight dorsal margin; armed with 2 minute, almost invisible setae. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +In the possession of distinct rami on the swimming legs, the lamellate antenna and leg 5, and the labrum bearing a pair of palps, +bnterçcçlẚdes elçngatus +sp. nov +. belongs to the +bnterçcçla -bnterçcçlẚdes -iequerrea +lineage. Within this small cluster of genera, the new species is included in +bnterçcçlẚdes +due to the presence of both antennules and antennae, and to the possession of unarmed endopods on swimming legs 1-4. However, the new species differs markedly from its two congeners, +b +. +ecaudataus +and +b +. +pacẚfẚcus +sp. nov. +as follows: the endopods of the swimming legs are attenuated and extremely elongated, caudal rami are present (although very small), the first to fourth pedigerous somites bear dorsal tergal folds and ventral interpodal protrusions, and the precoxa of the maxillule and distal segment of the maxilla are armed with spines or spiniform processes. The relatively plesiomorphic condition of the maxillule and maxilla, and the apomorphic state of the swimming legs are the most notable characters defining the new species, but it is clear that the relationships between these genera are in need of further analysis, perhaps when males become known. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF15FF04FA93FCC5D5B71C33.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF15FF04FA93FCC5D5B71C33.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..382dbdec9ba --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF15FF04FA93FCC5D5B71C33.xml @@ -0,0 +1,281 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola unisetosus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 158 +, +159 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21568, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +mçlyclẚnum +sp.; +Saldana Bay +, +South Africa +, +Monniot +coll., + +02 August 1996 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +unẚ +(=one) and +set +(=a bristle), referring to the presence of a single seta on the endopods of legs 1-4. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 158 +A-C) eruciform, slightly curved dorsally; body length +1.48 mm +; maximum width 480 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalosome 240×338 μm, distinctly narrower than trunk, indistinctly defined from trunk. Trunk unsegmented, but with faint wrinkles dorsally and laterally between somites; first to third pedigerous somites bearing small dorsolateral tergal folds. Fourth pedigerous somite produced dorsally ( +Fig. 158C +), bearing pair of ventral interpodal protrusions ( +Fig. 158B +). Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 158D +) incompletely 4-segmented; anal prominence obscure. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 158E +) short, 1.07 times longer than wide (61×57 μm), unarmed, with rounded distal margin. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 158F +) unsegmented, semicircular, wider than long (55×72 μm), armed with 1 small tubercle in middle of posterior side and 1 broad, naked seta (32 μm long) posterodistally; and ornamented with 2 rows of minute spinules distally. Antenna ( +Fig. 158G +) indistinctly 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment armed with 6 setae; lengths of setae I-VI (medial to lateral) 36, 57, 54, 59, 69, and 58 μm, respectively. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 158H +) with scattered spinules on ventrolateral surface; palp spinulose, broad, leaf-like. Mandible ( +Fig. 158H +) spinulose, gradually narrowing distally, narrower but longer than labral palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa ( +Fig. 158J +) and palp ( +Fig. 158I +); precoxa bifurcate distally, with endite bearing 1 spinulose spine (without tuft of setules or spinules); palp armed with 6 stout, subequal spines (5 on distal margin and 1 on lateral margin). Maxilla ( +Fig. 158K +) 2-segmented; mediodistal process of proximal segment truncate, bearing 2 small tubercles distally, surface covered with granules; distal segment bifurcate distally, with numerous granules on anterior surface and 1 stout seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of unarmed, distinctly 2-segmented protopod and unsegmented rami ( +Fig. 159 +A-C); protopods ornamented with multiple rows of fine spinules on anterior surface. Exopods of leg 1 and 2 with 2 small claws (distal and subdistal) and 3 patches of minute spinules on lateral margin ( +Fig. 159A +); exopod of leg 3 attenuated, lacking claw or spinules ( +Fig. 159B +); exopod of leg 4 tipped with small claw ( +Fig. 159C +). Endopods of legs 1-4 armed with single seta distally; endopodal segments about twice longer than wide, with convex lateral margin. Setae on endopods about 1.2 times longer than endopodal segment. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 159D +) unarmed, wider than long (172×246 μm). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 159E +) probably represented by 2 small spinules on genital operculum. + + + +FIG. 158. +bnterçcçla unẚsetçsus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, habitus, right; D, leg 5 and genitoabdomen. dorsal; E, caudal rami; F, antennule; G, antenna; H, labrum and mandibles; I, palp of maxillule; J, precoxa of maxillule; K, maxilla. Scale bars: A-C, 0.2 mm; D, 0.1 mm; E, G, K, 0.05 mm; F, H-J, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 159. +bnterçcçla unẚsetçsus +sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 3, C, leg 4; D, leg 5; E, genital aperture. Scale bars: A-C, 0.05 mm; D, 0.1 mm; E, 0.02 mm. + + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +bnterçcçla unẚsetçsus +sp. nov. +is clearly recognizable by one striking feature: the presence of only a single seta on the endopods of swimming legs 1-4. No other species has 1 seta on all legs. In +b +. +çlẚgçsetçsus +sp. nov. +the endopod of leg 4 is armed with 1 seta, but legs 1-3 typically have 2 setae. In some other +bnterçcçla +species, one of the 2 distal setae on the endopods can be reduced to a minute setule-like vestige, such as in legs 3 and 4 of +b +. +cçnẚculus +and +b +. +mçnnẚçtẚ +( +Ooishi, 2014a +; +Marchenkov & Boxshall, 2005 +), but in none of these has one of the distal setae been lost from all swimming legs, as in the new species. The leg setation of +b +. +unẚsetçsus +sp. nov. +seems to represent an intermediate condition between the typical +bnterçcçla +pattern and that of +bnterçcçlẚdes +, in which the endopods of legs 3 and 4 are unarmed, as redefined in the present work. + + + +Genus + +Enterocolides +Chatton & Harant, 1922 + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Female: Body form and most morphological features as in +bnterçcçla +, except as follows: genitoabdomen short, unsegmented, lacking caudal rami. Palp of maxillule lacking lateral seta, or this seta vestigial. Endopods of legs 1 and 2 unarmed or armed with 2 setae distally; endopods of legs 3 and 4 unarmed. + + + + + +Type +species. + +bnterçcçlẚdes ecaudatus +Chatton & Harant, 1922 by original designation. + + + + +Remarks. +Until now +bnterçcçlẚdes +has remained a monotypic genus and its +type +species was redescribed by Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +. In its original description, Chatton & Harant (1922) separated this genus from +bnterçcçla +by its unsegmented abdomen, the lack of caudal rami, the lack of setae on the endopods of swimming legs, the presence of a supplementary claw on the exopods of legs 1 and 2, and by the dorsal position of the anus. Later authors (Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +; +Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 +) recognized the absence of setae on the endopods of the swimming legs as a key character of +bnterçcçlẚdes +. + + +A new species +bnterçcçlẚdes pacẚfẚcus +sp. nov. +is described below and is placed in +bnterçcçlẚdes +even though it carries a pair of setae on the endopods of legs 1 and 2. It shares the lobate genitoabdomen lacking caudal rami, the reduction of the lateral seta on the maxillular palp, and the lack of setae on the endopods of legs 3 and 4,with the +type +species +bK ecaudatus +and, on the balance of evidence available, we therefore place the new species in +bnterçcçlẚdes +rather than in +bnterçcçla +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF16FF02FA93FE15D7E01B1E.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF16FF02FA93FE15D7E01B1E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..71d0217ee2c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF16FF02FA93FE15D7E01B1E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,358 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocolides pacificus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 160-162 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21569), +3 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21570) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21480) from +ieptçclẚnẚdes +sp. (MNHN-IT-2008-4853 = +MNHN +A2 +/ +LEP/95 +); +Papua New Guinea +, +SE Normanby Is. +, Cape Prevost, +CRCHO 501 +, Site PREVOST 2 ( +12°06.33´S +, +150°57.68´E +), depth + +49 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +20 January 2002 + +. + + + +Additional non-type material. + +11 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21571, +2 ♀♀ +dissected) from + +Atr +ẚçlum marsupẚalẚs + +Monniot F. +, 1989 (MNHN-IT-2008-1347 = +MNHN +A2 +/ +ATR/1 +); +New Caledonia +, Grande Terre, Ilot Maitre, près de la balise, +Stn NC +14, depth + +6-9 m + +, +Monniot +coll., + +11 September 1985 + + +; + +7 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21572, +1 ♀ +dissected) from + +Tr +ẚdẚdemnum + +sp.; +Papua New Guinea +, +CRCHO 491 +, +Site +DUCHEDD IS, off +W Normanby I. +( +09°57.82´S +, +150°50.73´E +), depth + +10 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +19 January 2002 + + +. + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species reflects its distribution (Pacific Ocean), in contrast to the Mediterranean distribution of the +type +species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 160A, B +) cylindrical, unsegmented, curved dorsally. Body length 800 μm; maximum width 315 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalic shield 167×256 μm, slightly narrower than trunk, with incomplete posterior margin. Trunk unsegmented; first to fourth pedigerous somites each bearing large, lamellate tergal folds dorsolaterally. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 160C +) short, dorsoventrally deeper than laterally wide, unsegmented, with 2 or 3 faint wrinkles laterally; anal prominence large. Caudal rami and caudal setae absent. Egg sac ( +Fig. 160D +) containing 4- +6 eggs +; each egg about 167 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 160E +) elongate, unsegmented, about 2.3 times longer than wide (70×30 μm), tapering in distal half; armed with 8 small setae, 4 subdistally and 4 on apex. Antenna ( +Fig. 160F +) about 2.0 times longer than wide (127×63 μm), 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed, but ornamented with posterodistal patch of minute spinules; distal segment narrowing distally, armed with 4 setae (setae II-V) at apex, 1 larger than others; setae I and VI reduced to setule-like vestiges separated from large setae. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 160G +) with narrow, spinulose palps. Mandible spinulose, tapering, slightly broader than labral palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa ( +Fig. 160H +) and palp ( +Fig. 160I +); precoxa bluntly trilobed distally, with endite bearing 1 naked seta and tuft of numerous thin setules; palp with 5 spinulose spines (or spiniform setae) on distal margin and 1 minute vestigial seta on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 160J +) 2-segmented; proximal segment with large, spinulose process mediodistally; distal segment unequally bifurcate, unarmed and unornamented. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of 2-segmented, unarmed protopod and unsegmented rami ( +Fig. 161 +A-C). Exopods of legs 1, 2, and 4 small, much shorter than endopods, unarmed, triangular, pointed distally; exopod of legs 3 attenuated, with acutely pointed tip. Endopods of legs 1 and 2 twice as long as wide, armed with 2 naked setae distally; laterodistal seta 0.7 times as long as endopodal segment, but slightly longer than mediodistal seta. Endopods of legs 3 and 4 unarmed, slightly longer than wide, with rounded distal margin. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 160K +) lamellate, unarmed, wider than long (130×196 μm). + + + +Comparative description of female associated with +Atiolum marsupialis + +in +New Caledonia +( +Fig. 162 +). Body ( +Fig. 162A, B +) inflated, fleshy; body length +1.03 mm +in dissected specimen; mean body length +0.96 mm +( +0.82-1.11 mm +, n=8); maximum width 441 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalic shield much narrower than trunk, with obscure dorsal margin. Dorsolateral tergal folds less developed than those of +type +specimens. Egg sac containing more than +30 eggs +; each egg about 140 μm in diameter, smaller than in +type +specimens. + + +Antennule ( +Fig. 162C +) more slender than that of +type +specimens, armed with 8 small setae. Antenna ( +Fig. 162D +) as that of +type +specimens in form and armature, but relative lengths of setae slightly different. Labrum ( +Fig. 162F +) ornamented with several patches of spinules on ventral surface. Mandible ( +Fig. 162F +), maxillule ( +Fig. 162G, H +), and maxilla ( +Fig. 162I +) as in +type +specimens. + + + +FIG. 160. +bnterçcçlẚdes pacẚfẚcus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, genitoabdomen, right; D, egg sac; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum; H, precoxa of maxillule; I, palp of maxillule; J, maxilla; K, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C, K, 0.05 mm; D, 0.2 mm; E-J, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 161. +bnterçcçlẚdes pacẚfẚcus +sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 3; C, leg 4. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. + + + +Legs 1-4 with same form and setation as in +type +specimens, but distal setae on endopods of legs 1 and 2 slightly longer and weakly pinnate. Leg 5 ( +Fig. 162M +) 110×204 μm. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +As illustrated, the +type +specimens from +Papua New Guinea +and additional material from +New Caledonia +exhibit some differences in body form, in the development of the dorsolateral tergal folds on the trunk, the relative lengths of the setae on the antenna and legs 1 and 2, and in the size of the eggs. However, we infer that these differences represent infraspecific variation. + + +The presence of 2 setae on the endopods of legs 1 and 2 of +b +. +pacẚfẚcus +sp. nov. +is the most marked difference from the +type +species, +b +. +ecaudatus +, which lacks endopodal setae on all legs. Other differences include: the presence of well-developed dorsolateral tergal folds on the first to fourth pedigerous somites (cf. these tergal folds lacking in +b +. +ecaudatus +), the antennule is armed with 8 setae (cf. 2 setae and several spinules in +b +. +ecaudatus +, according to illustration in Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +), the antenna is 2-segmented and armed with 4 naked setae plus 2 setule-like vestiges (cf. unsegmented and armed with 6 spinulose setae in +b +. +ecaudatus +), the distal margin of the maxillular palp is armed with 5 setae (cf. 4 setae in +b +. +ecaudatus +), the lateral margin of the exopods of legs 1, 2, and 4 is smooth (cf. ornamented with a cusp and spinules in +b +. +ecaudatus +), the distal segment of the maxilla is distally bifurcate and lacks a proximal seta (cf. simple, but with a proximal seta in +b +. +ecaudatus +), and leg 5 is wider than long and unarmed (cf. longer than wide and armed with a pair of small setae in +b +. +ecaudatus +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF18FF08FA93FC07D0351B6A.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF18FF08FA93FC07D0351B6A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7c809f491f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF18FF08FA93FC07D0351B6A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Monnioticopa minuta + +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 167 +, +168 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21576) and +paratype +♀ +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21482) from +iẚssçclẚnum badẚum +Monniot F. +& +Monniot C. +, 1996 (MNHN-IT-2008-4913); +Papua New Guinea +, N tip of +Normanby I. +, pinnacle W of +Observation Point +, +CRCHO 516 +, ( +09°44.59´S +, +150°43.01´E +), depth + +36 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +16 January 2002 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species refers to its relatively small body. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 167A, B +) relatively small; body length 636 μm; maximum width 192 μm (across third pedigerous somite). Cephalic shield short, more than twice as wide as long (74×164 μm), with indis- tinct posterodorsal margin. Trunk unsegmented with 3 faint transverse sclerotization bands between 4 anterior pedigerous somites; second to fourth pedigerous somites bearing weak tergal folds dorsolaterally, but without ventral interpodal protrusions; fifth pedigerous somite narrower than anterior part of trunk. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 167C +) 4-segmented; 3 free abdominal somites 25×58, 22×50, and 28×47 μm, respectively, ornamented with many rows of minute spinules on ventral surface. Anal somite with 3 transverse rows of minute spinules on lateral surfaces; anal prominence distinct, with longitudinal row of minute spinules on each lobe. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 167D +) nearly rectangular, nearly twice as long as wide (37×19 μm); ornamented with transverse rows of minute spinules on ventral surface; armed with 1 dorsal seta (25 μm long) at 65% of ramus length, and 4 wart-like, rudimentary setae subdistally on dorsal margin. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 167F +) small, semicircular, bearing pairs of sensilla subdistally and proximally. Antennule ( +Fig. 167F +) 51 μm long, incompletely 2-segmented; proximal segment armed with 1 seta on anterior margin; distal seg- ment narrower and slightly shorter than proximal segment, armed with 8 setae grouped as 3, 1, and distal 4. Antenna ( +Fig. 167G +) elongate, about 42 μm long, digitiform, 3-segmented; distal segment broader than proximal segments, with minute spinules on apical surface. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 167E +) unornamented; lacking palps. Mandible ( +Fig. 167H +) unsegmented, tipped with powerful claw 25 μm long. Maxillule ( +Fig. 167I +) bilobed; larger inner lobe tipped with spinulose seta and densely pigmented area along medial side; smaller outer lobe tipped with 1 thin, naked seta. Maxilla ( +Fig. 167J, K +) bilobate, with longer inner lobe (endite of syncoxa) tipped with 1 seta; shorter outer lobe with 3 unequal setae (2 distal and 1 subdistal). Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of 2-segmented protopod, 2-segmented exopod, and unsegmented endopod; basis with small outer seta. Legs 1, 2, and 4 same in form and armature; distal exopodal segment tipped with small claw and circular element ( +Fig. 168A +). Exopod of leg 3 ( +Fig. 168B +) with large spiniform process on laterodistal margin. Endopods of legs 1-4 with 2 unequal, naked setae distally; laterodistal seta about 1.5 times longer than mediodistal seta. Mediodistal seta as long as or slightly longer than endopodal segment. + + + +FIG. 167. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa mẚnuta +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, genitoabdomen, ventral; D, anal somite and caudal rami, dorsal; E, cephalic appendages +ẚn sẚtu +, ventral; F, rostrum and antennule; G, antenna; H, mandible; I, maxillule; J, K, maxillae. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C-F, 0.02 mm; G-K, 0.01 mm. + + + + +FIG. 168. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa mẚnuta +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 3; C, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, 0.02 mm; C, 0.05 mm. + + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 168C +) lamellate, as long as wide (100×100 μm), narrowed proximally; armed with 2 small setae on distal margin. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa mẚnuta +gen. et sp. nov. +is distinguishable from the +type +species of the genus by the following features: (1) the caudal rami are 1.95 times longer than wide (vs. 1.47 times in the +type +species); (2) the proximal segment of the antennule is armed with 1 seta (vs. 2 setae in the +type +species); (3) the coxa of the swimming legs is not expanded (vs. expanded, disc-shaped); (4) the basis of swimming legs 1-4 is armed with an outer seta (vs. unarmed in the +type +species); and (5) leg 5 narrows proximally (vs. not narrowed). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF1AFEF5FA93F9EED0BB1F4F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF1AFEF5FA93F9EED0BB1F4F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..70ee1403452 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF1AFEF5FA93F9EED0BB1F4F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Monnioticopa firma + +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 169 +, +170 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21577, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +mycnçclavella dẚmẚnuta +(Kott, 1957); +Ibo I. +, +Mozambique +, AURACEA 1995 cruise, +Stn P +12, on reef, +Monniot +coll., + +13 November 1995 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +fẚrm +(=strong), reflecting its stout body bearing well-developed tergites on the pedigerous somites. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 169 +A-C) eruciform, robust; body length +1.05 mm +; maximum width 440 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalosome clearly defined from trunk, only slightly narrower than first pedigerous somite. First to fourth pedigerous somites distinctly defined from one another, subequal in width, each bearing distinct tergite with rounded lateral margins. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 169D +) 4-segmented; first free abdominal somite bearing tubercle on lateral surface; anal somite bearing large anal prominence dorsally. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 169E +) fusiform, longer than anal somite, 2.04 times longer than wide (112×55 μm), with weakly bilobed distal mar- gin, and ornamented with 2 patches of minute spinules ventrodistally; armed with 1 large dorsal seta (63 μm long) at 80% of ramus length. + + + +FIG. 169. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa fẚrma +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, habitus, right; D, genitoabdomen, right; E, left caudal ramus, dorsal; F, antennule; G, antenna; H, labrum; I, mandible; J, maxillule; K, maxilla; L, leg 5. Scale bars: A-D, 0.1 mm; E, L, 0.05 mm; F-K, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 170. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa fẚrma +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 3; C, exopod of leg 3. Scale bars: A, B, 0.05 mm; C, 0.02 mm. + + + +Rostrum small, tapering towards rounded apex. Antennule ( +Fig. 169F +) 2-segmented, 123 μm long; proximal segment armed with 4 small setae; distal segment narrower but longer than proximal segment; armed with 8 small setae. Antenna ( +Fig. 169G +) elongate, unarmed, distinctly 3-segmented, about 132 μm long; second segment wider than other segments; second and third segments covered with minute spinules; third segment longest, narrower than other segments, gradually narrowing distally. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 169H +) unornamented, with sclerotized lateral margins. Mandible ( +Fig. 169I +) as powerful claw, smooth and curved. Maxillule ( +Fig. 169K +) bilobed; inner lobe unarmed; outer lobe tipped with 1 spinulose seta. Maxilla ( +Fig. 169J +) consisting of proximal part plus inner and outer lobes; proximal part with strongly projecting mediodistal corner; longer inner lobe tipped with 1 spinulose seta; shorter outer lobe armed with 2 unilaterally serrate setae distally, and 1 small naked seta at midlength. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of 2-segmented, unarmed protopod and unsegmented rami ( +Fig. 170 +A-C); coxa with large mediodistal protrusion ( +Fig. 170A, B +); basis with weak mediodistal protrusion covered with minute spinules. Exopods distinctly shorter than endopods. Exopods of legs 1 and 2 tipped with 1 claw and 1 circular lamella; exopods of leg 3 and 4 additionally with 1 large spine on anterolateral surface at distal two-thirds of ramus length ( +Fig. 170C +). Endopods robust, curved medially, with truncate distal margin, armed with 2 setae distally, and covered with minute spinules. Endopodal segments 74×36, 98×45, 105×49, and 90×49 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae 72 and 55, 78 and 72, 96 and 79, and 102 and 84 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 169L +) quadrate, slightly wider than long (159×179 μm), covering lateral margin of genitoabdomen; armed with 2 small setae. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa fẚrma +gen. et sp. nov. +differs from the two congeners described above as follows: (1) the first segment of the antennule of the new species is armed with 4 setae, compared to 2 setae in +M +. +prẚma +gen. et sp. nov. +and 1 seta in +M +. +mẚnuta +gen. et sp. nov. +; (2) the third segment of the antenna is distinctly longer and narrower than the proximal segments, but in the two congeners this segment is not longer or narrower than the proximal segments; (3) the inner lobe of the maxillule is unarmed, compared to bearing 1 seta in the congeners; (4) the proximal part of the maxilla bears a strong mediodistal projection, which is absent in both congeners; (5) the coxa of the swimming legs bears a large mediodistal projection, which is absent in the congeneric species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF1CFF0DFA93F892D19D18CC.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF1CFF0DFA93F892D19D18CC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2d6a118c2c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF1CFF0DFA93F892D19D18CC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Monnioticopa + +gen. nov. + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Female: Body eruciform or vermiform, weakly segmented, consisting of cephalosome, trunk incorporating first to fifth pedigerous somites, and genitoabdomen. Dorsal tergites indistinct or well-developed on first to fourth pedigerous somites. Anal somite bearing distinct anal prominence. Caudal rami broad, flattened, armed with 1 major and several vestigial setae. Rostrum present. Antennule small, 2- to 4-segmented, armed with small setae. Antenna digitiform, 3- or 4-segmented, unarmed, or almost unarmed. Labrum simple, lacking palps. Mandible modified as powerful claw. Maxillule bilobed; inner lobe (precoxal endite) armed with 0 to 2 setae (or spines) on apex; outer lobe (palp) armed with 1 apical seta. Maxilla bilobate or unilobate, with unsegmented syncoxa; when bilobate, inner lobe (endite of syncoxa) tipped with 1 seta, and outer lobe (basis) armed with 3 setae. Maxilliped absent. Legs 1-4 biramous, each with 2-segmented protopod: coxa unarmed, but expanded and flattened in some species; basis unarmed or armed with outer seta and mediodistal seta in leg 1. Exopods unsegmented or 2-segmented in legs 3 and 4, apically tipped with 1 small claw, and in some species armed with 2 setae on lateral margin. Exopod of leg 3 armed additionally with 1 large spine on lateral margin. Endopods armed distally with 2 setae. Leg 5 lamellate, armed with 2 or 4 minute setae. + + +Male +: unknown. + + + + + +Type +species. + +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa prẚma +gen. et sp. nov. +by original designation. + + + + +Etymology. +The new genus is named in honour of Dr. Françoise Monniot, who made it possible for us to study the copepod material she and Claude Monniot collected. Gender feminine. + + + + +Remarks. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa +gen. nov. +can be readily differentiated from existing genera in the family +Enteropsidae +by the following apomorphic character states: (1) the mandible is represented by a strong claw; (2) the antenna is digitiform, 3- or 4-segmented, and unarmed or almost unarmed; (3) the labrum lacks palps (or any processes); and (4) the caudal rami are broad and armed with 1 major plus several vestigial setae. Within the family, +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa +gen. nov. +is most closely related to +bnterçcçla +with which it shares the possession of biramous swimming legs armed with a pair of setae on the endopods, and the lamellate fifth leg. However, the four apomorphic features of +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa +gen. nov +. listed above are highly significant and ensure that the new genus cannot be confused with +bnterçcçla +(or any other genera in the +Enteropsidae +). + + + + + +Key to species of + +Monnioticopa + +gen. nov. + + + +1. Inner lobe of maxillule armed with 2 spines; maxilla unilobate; exopods of legs 1 and 2 armed with claw plus 2 setae.................................................................................... +M +. +planẚcçxa +gen. et sp. nov. +Inner lobe of maxillule unarmed or armed with 1 seta; maxilla bilobate; exopods of legs 1 and 2 armed with distal claw.... 2 + + +2. Inner lobe maxillule unarmed; coxae of legs 1-4 with large mediodistal projection............... +M +. +fẚrma +gen. et sp. nov. +Inner lobe of maxillule tipped with 1 seta; coxae of legs 1-4 lacking mediodistal projection........................... 3 + + +3. Legs 1-4 exopods 2-segmented; first antennular segment with 1 seta; leg 5 proximally narrowed.. +M +. +mẚnuta +gen. et sp. nov. +Legs 1-4 exopods 1-segmented; first antennular segment with 2 or more setae; leg 5 not proximally narrowed............ 4 + + +4. First antennular segment with 2 setae; first segment of antenna the longest; all setae on outer lobe of maxilla not transformed................................................................................ +M +. +prẚma +gen. et sp. nov. + + +5. First antennular segment with 4 setae; terminal segment of antenna the longest; 2 distal setae on outer lobe of maxilla sigmoid.......................................................................... +M +. +manadçensẚs +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF1FFF0AFA93F983D4F01E4B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF1FFF0AFA93F983D4F01E4B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c536ce1cf96 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF1FFF0AFA93F983D4F01E4B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,195 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Monnioticopa prima + +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 165 +, +166 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21574), +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21575), and +2 ♀♀ +para- types (dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21481) from + +Cystçdytes + +sp. (MNHN-IT-2008-2621 = +MNHN +A3 +/ +CYS/135 +); +The +Philippines +, +OCDN 5119 +-X, ( +09°31.02´N +, +123°40.83´E +), depth + +10 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +15 April 1997 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +prẚm +(=first), indicating that it is first described species in the genus. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 165A, B +) eruciform, stout; body length 916 μm; maximum width 364 μm (across third pedigerous somite). Cephalosome short, twice as wide as long (113×236 μm), not articulated from trunk, but defined by lateral constrictions. Trunk gradually broadening posteriorly; first to fourth pedigerous somites defined from one another by lateral constrictions and wrinkles; each somite with small, weak dorsolateral tergal folds ( +Fig. 165A +), but lacking ventral interpodal protrusions. Fifth pedigerous somite completely fused with fourth. Genitoabdomen directed dorsally, indistinctly segmented dorsally, but distinctly 4-segmented ventrally.Anal somite ( +Fig. 165C +) ornamented with 2 to 4 transverse rows of minute spinules on lateral surfaces and patch of minute spinules on each side of anal prominence; anal prominence large, bilobed, with patch of minute spinules near apex of lobes. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 165C +) rectangular, about 1.5 times longer than wide (44×30 μm), with rounded mediodistal protrusion, and ornamented with numerous minute spinules on surfaces of distal two-thirds of ramus; armed with 1 prominent dorsal seta (17 μm long) at 70% of ramus length and 3 minute, spinule-like setae on distal margin. Egg sac ( +Fig. 165D +) 396×189 μm, fusiform; each egg about 100 μm in diameter. + + + +FIG. 165. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa prẚma +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, left; C, anal somite and caudal rami, dorsal; D, egg sac; E, rostrum; F, antennule; G, antenna; H, labrum; I, mandible; J, maxillule; K, L, maxillae; M, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, D, 0.1 mm; C, 0.02 mm; E-L, 0.01 mm; M, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 166. +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa prẚma +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 2; C, leg 3; D, leg 4. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 165E +) well-developed, semicircular, unornamented. Antennule ( +Fig. 165F +) 79 μm long, narrow, 2-segmented; proximal segment armed with 2 small setae; distal segment slightly longer than proximal segment, armed with 8 setae (4 on anterior margin and 4 on apex), 2 of distal setae distinctly larger than other setae, longest 20 μm long. Antenna ( +Fig. 165G +) 65×13 μm, elongate, digitiform, 3-segmented, unarmed, but ornamented with few minute granules on 2 distal segments; lengths of first to third segments 25, 21, and 19 μm, respectively; third segment blunt with rounded apex. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 165H +) simple, subcircular, lacking palp, unornamented. Mandible ( +Fig. 165I +) as massive claw, 37×24 μm, tapering, sclerotized, slightly curved, with subcircular unsclerotized region proximally. Maxillule ( +Fig. 165J +) bilobed; larger inner lobe tipped with broad, spinulose seta; small outer lobe tipped with small, naked seta. Maxilla ( +Fig. 165K, L +) bilobate; longer inner lobe (endite of syncoxa) tipped with 1 broad, naked seta; shorter outer lobe armed with 3 broad, naked setae (2 distal and 1 subdistal) of unequal sizes. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 166 +A-D) each consisting of unarmed 2-segmented protopod and unsegmented rami; coxa expanded, plate-like; basis with patches of minute spinules on medial side of anterior surface. Exopods shorter than endopods, tipped with 1 claw-like element and circular membranous element. Exopod of leg 3 armed with 1 elongate, acute spine originating in middle of lateral margin and extending to apex of ramus; exopod of leg 4 with small notch in middle of lateral margin. Endopods armed with 2 naked setae distally and with unsclerotized region at proximal third of medial side. Sizes of endopods 38×19, 57×27, 64×31, and 67×33 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae of endopods 62 and 44, 59 and 40, 72 and 50, and 77 and 57 μm, re- spectively, in legs 1-4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 165M +) lamellate, subcircular, 134×138 μm, with 2 minute vestigial setae; separated by distance of 100 μm. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The two dissected +paratypes +revealed no noticeable variation, except in the ornamentation of the anal somite, with 2 transverse rows of minute spinules on lateral surfaces in +one specimen +, but 4 rows of spinules in another. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF20FF32FA93FF10D15A1B90.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF20FF32FA93FF10D15A1B90.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..07565a19bfb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF20FF32FA93FF10D15A1B90.xml @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola pterophorus +Chatton & Brément, 1909 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 125 +, +126 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +6 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21541, +2 ♀♀ +dissected) in +Trẚdẚdemnum cereum +(Giard, 1872); +Glenan Is. +, Atlantic coast of +France +, +Lafargue +coll., date unknown + +. + + +Supplementary description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 125A, B +) inflated, unsegmented, slightly depressed, and curved dorsally. Body length +1.09 mm +in largest specimen; maximum width 445 μm (across region of leg 2). Cepha- losome obscurely defined from trunk, much wider than long. Trunk narrowing posteriorly, with 3 pairs of dorsal tergal folds, 1 pair each on second to fourth pedigerous somites; left and right tergal folds separated from each other on second pedigerous somite, but close to each other on third and fourth pedigerous somites. Ventral surface of trunk lacking interpodal protrusions between left and right legs. Genitoabdomen not defined from but distinctly narrower than trunk, lacking any trace of articulation; dorsal anal prominence distinct. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 125C +) about 2.0 times longer than wide (67×33 μm), unarmed, tapering towards blunt apex. Egg sac ( +Fig. 125D +) curved, 505×240 μm; eggs arranged in 3 or 4 rows, each egg about 160 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 125E +) 42×27 μm, strongly tapering, with convex anterior margin and straight posterior margin, armed distally with 5 (occasionally 4) setae of subequal lengths. Antenna ( +Fig. 125F +) flattened, indistinctly 2-segmented, 119×57 μm; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment as long as proximal segment, armed with 6 small setae, and ornamented with fine spinules on concave surface; lengths of setae I-VI (medial to lateral setae) 15, 12, 12, 20, 21, and 34 μm, respectively; setae 1-3 curved and stiff. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 125G +) rhomboidal, bearing pair of palps and patch of spinules near base of palps; palp densely spinulose, club-shaped, gradually thickening distally. Mandible ( +Fig. 125G +) tapering, densely spinulose, slightly shorter than labral palp. Maxillule ( +Fig. 125H, I +) 2-segmented; endite of proximal segment (precoxa) with 1 slender, spinulose seta and more than 20 thin setules; palm-shaped distal segment (palp) with 5 spinulose setae on distal margin and 1 small, naked, setiform process on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 125J +) 2-segmented; proximal segment (syncoxa) with mediodistal endite bearing thick, spinulose, spiniform element; distal segment with tapering distal part, with thick subterminal spine bearing several rows of spinules along medial margin, and with 1 small seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each with unsegmented protopod and rami ( +Fig. 126 +A-C); protopods unarmed. Exopod of leg 3 ( +Fig. 126B +) elongate, longer than endopod, and acutely pointed. Exopods of legs 1, 2, and 3 distinctly shorter than endopod, tipped with small, claw-like process. Endopods of legs 1-4 50×27, 58×29, 54×27, and 46×26 μm, respectively. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae on endopods: 52 and 45, 45 and 41, 48 and 45, and 50 and 41 μm in legs 1-4, respectively. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 125K +) much wider than long (120×205 μm) and unarmed. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +bnterçcçla pterçphçrus +was redescribed and illustrated in detail by Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +based on specimens from a variety of different ascidian hosts. Of the copepods they examined, those associated with +aẚdemnum + +fulgens +(Milne Edwards, 1841) + +from the Mediterranean Sea and +Trẚdẚdemnum tenerum +(Verrill, 1871) from the North East Atlantic displayed the characteristic form and setation of the antennule and antenna, and this was shared with our specimens associated with +Trẚdẚdemnum cereum +from the North East Atlantic. In this material the antennule tapers and is armed with 3 to 5 small setae distally, and the antenna is armed with 6 small setae (mediodistal 3 strongly curved). In addition to these features, our specimens and those of Illg & Dudley’s share an unsegmented genitoabdomen and the absence of the ventral interpodal protrusions between left and right legs. On the basis of the evidence provided by the combination of all these characters, we identified our specimens as +b +. +pterçphçrus +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF22FF3EFA93FB84D1361A1F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF22FF3EFA93FB84D1361A1F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fecde9d2c18 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF22FF3EFA93FB84D1361A1F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola fulgens +van Beneden, 1860 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 127 +, +128 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +9 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21542, +2 ♀♀ +dissected) from +mçlyclẚnum aurantẚum +Milne Edwards, 1841; Saint-Vaast-la-Hougue, Atlantic coast of +France +, +Monniot +coll., date unknown + +. + + +Supplementary description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 127 +A-C) eruciform, cylindrical, consisting of cephalosome, trunk and genitoabdomen. Body length +1.36 mm +in dissected specimen; mean body length +1.27 mm +( +0.98-1.45 mm +), based on +7 specimens +: maximum width 352 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalosome 1.25 times wider than long, distinctly narrower than trunk, and well-defined from first pedigerous somite. Trunk consisting of first to fifth pedigerous somites, unsegmented or indistinctly segmented; first to fourth pedigerous somites each bearing dorsal tergite and paired ventral interpodal protrusions, these protrusions weak in first and second pedigerous somites, but prominent in third and fourth; in young adult ( +Fig. 127C +) dorsal tergites usually incomplete, forming dorsolateral tergal folds. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 127D +) 4-segmented, consisting of genital double-somite and 3 abdominal somites, ornamented with numerous minute spinules on all surfaces; articulations between somites distinct on ventral surface but indistinct dorsally; anal prominence large. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 127E +) unarmed, about 2.5 times longer than wide (136×54 μm), slightly narrowing distally, about twice as long as anal somite, with rounded distal margin; covered with numerous minute spinules. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 127G +) distinctly 3-segmented, consisting of expanded first segment and small distal segments; first segment much wider than long (45×61 μm), with straight, sclerotized anterior margin, strongly protruding posterior margin, armed with 1 small seta distally and ornamented with 2-5 setiform spinules near base of second segment; second segment wider than long (5×8 μm) armed with 1 small seta at posterodistal corner; third segment slightly longer than wide (7×5 μm), armed with 1 seta and 1 setiform process distally. Antenna ( +Fig. 127H +) about 135×68 μm, 2-segmented, but suture line between segments vestigial; proximal segment unarmed, but ornamented with spinules on convex surface; distal segment distinctly longer than proximal segment, armed with 6 small setae and ornamented with scattered spinules on convex surface; lengths of setae I-VI (medial to lateral) 18, 32, 25, 11, 27, and 13 μm, respectively; setae +IV +and +VI +markedly smaller than other 4 setae. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 127I +) with cylindrical, spinulose palp and 2 patches of spinules on each side; posterior margin projecting, with truncate apex. Mandible ( +Fig. 127I +) spinulose, shorter and more slender than labral palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa ( +Fig. 127J +) and palp ( +Fig. 127K +): precoxa ( +Fig. 127J +) with bluntly bifurcate tip; endite tipped with 1 spinulose spine and about 10 short spinules: palp ( +Fig. 127K +) with 5 stout spinulose spines on distal margin and 1 naked, attenuated spine on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 127L +) 2-segmented; proximal segment (syncoxa) with mediodistal endite extending to distally spinulose large process; distal segment with 2 blunt distal projections (shorter anterior and longer posterior), and 1 small, blunt seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + + +FIG. 127. +bnterçcçla + +fulgens +van Beneden, 1860 + +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, habitus of young adult, dorsal; D, genitoabdomen, dorsal; E, caudal rami, dorsal; F, egg sac; G, antennule, with inset showing detail of distal segments; H, antenna; I, labrum and mandibles; J, precoxa of maxillule; K, palp of maxillule; L, maxilla. Scale bars: A-C, F, 0.2 mm; D, 0.1 mm; E, 0.05 mm; G-L, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 128. +bnterçcçla + +fulgens +van Beneden, 1860 + +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 3; C, leg 5. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. + + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of 2-segmented protopod and 1-segmented rami; protopods unarmed, but ornamented with rows of minute spines. Exopods shorter than endopods ( +Fig. 128A +); exopod of leg 3 acute, spiniform ( +Fig. 128B +). Endopods 68×33, 89×38, 92×39, and 82×38 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4; each endopod armed with 2 setae distally. Two distal setae on endopods characteristically equal in length, 0.6-0.7 times as long as endopodal segments; lengths of endopodal setae 48, 59, 55, and 55 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 128C +) wider than long (167×196 μm), armed with 2 small setae on distal margin separated by dis- tance of 136 μm. + + + +Male +. + +See +Ooishi (2007b) +. + + + + +Remarks. +Ooishi (2007b) +redescribed this species in detail on the basis of specimens collected from the ascidian +mçlyclẚnum aurantẚum +at Roscoff. Our examined copepod specimens were associated with the same ascidian host from a nearby geographical locality. +bnterçcçla fulgens +seems to be a distinctive species due to its characteristic antennule which is distinctly 3-segmented, with the first segment inflated and 2 small distal segments. Nevertheless, we found some differences in details between Ooishi’s and our material, as follows: (1) the caudal ramus is 1.6 times longer than wide in Ooishi’s material, compared to 2.5 times longer than wide in our material; (2) the antennule is armed with 2, 1, and 3 setae on the first to third segments, compared to the setation 1, 1, and +1 in +our material; (3) the setae on the antenna of Ooishi’s material are shorter than those of our material; (4) the ventral interpodal protrusions on the first to fourth pedigerous somites of Ooishi’s material are obscure, but distinct in our material; and (5) the 2 distal setae on the endopods of legs 1-4 of Ooishi’s material are unequal in length, compared to the equal lengths in our material. On the evidence available, we interpret these differences as due to infraspecific variation, at least in part because some of this variability is shown in the illustrations of Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +. + + +Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +recorded variability in the setation of the antenna, noting that either 5 or 6 setae were present. In the 5-setae condition in Illg & Dudley’s material, the smallest apical seta (seta IV), which is the most likely to be overlooked, was missing. This variability could not be confirmed in our study or by +Ooishi (2007b) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF25FF35FA93FAD3D1221ED7.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF25FF35FA93FAD3D1221ED7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..10cda402b9e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF25FF35FA93FAD3D1221ED7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola clavelinae +Chatton & Harant, 1924 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 122 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +7 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21538, +1 ♀ +dissected) in +mycnçclavella nana +(Lahille, 1890) MNHN- IT-2008-2064; +Roscoff +, +Atlantic +coast of +France +, no other collection data + +. + + +Supplementary description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 122A, B +) eruciform, straight: body length +1.11 mm +, maximum width 336 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalosome wider than long, distinctly articulated from metasome. Trunk unsegmented, incorporating fifth pedigerous somite, with 4 distinct dorsal tergites; tergites of second to fourth pedigerous somites bilobed, forming left and right tergal folds ( +Fig. 122A +). First to fourth pedigerous somites each with pair of large interpodal protrusions on ventral surface between left and right legs ( +Fig. 122B, I, J +). Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 122C +) obscurely 4- or 5-segmented, about half as long as trunk; anal prominence distinct, directed anterodorsally. Caudal rami immediately adjacent to one another, incompletely articulated from anal somite, tapering, about 1.3 times longer than wide (75×58 μm), unarmed, with rounded distal margin. + + +Rostrum not developed. Antennule ( +Fig. 122D +) narrowing distally, unsegmented, 87×50 μm, armed with 9 small, unequal setae along distal third (5 setule-like). Antenna ( +Fig. 122E +) lamellate, twice as long as wide (145×69 μm), incompletely 2-segmented, with partial articulation on outer (lateral) surface; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment armed with 6 naked setae; medial seta (seta I) shortest, 30 μm long, positioned at midlength of medial margin of distal segment; 5 other setae (setae +II-VI +) 90, 100, 70, 80, and 82 μm, respectively, from medial to lateral. + + + +FIG. 122. +bnterçcçla clavelẚnae +Chatton & Harant, 1924, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, genitoabdomen, ventral; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, labrum; G, maxillule; H, maxilla; I, leg 1; J, leg 3; K, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C, I-K, 0.05 mm; D-H, 0.02 mm. + + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 122F +) on ventral surface with triangular, sclerotized elevated area in middle, and small spinulose lobe plus elongate, spinulose palp on each side. Mandible very similar to labral palp, elongate, and densely spinulose. Maxillule ( +Fig. 122G +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa comprising endite bearing 1 spinulose seta and about 5 setules, and highly sclerotized, bifurcate distal part; palp palm-like, armed with 6 spinulose setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 122H +) 2-segmented; proximal segment (syncoxa) with mediodistal endite bearing thick spinulose element; distal segment distally bifurcate, with small, transparent seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of 2-segmented protopod and 1-segmented rami; protopods unarmed. Exopods of legs 1, 2 and 3 shorter than endopodal segment, with small claw-like distal tip indistinctly demarcated by rudimentary suture. Exopod of leg 3 evenly tapering ( +Fig. 122J +), slightly longer than endopodal segment, with pointed tip. Leg 1 ( +Fig. 122I +) endopod 1.6 times longer than wide (53×33 μm), with convex outer margin; 2 distal setae equal in length, 83 μm long, 1.57 times longer than endopodal segment. Endopods of legs 2-4 similar in dimensions to that of leg 1, but laterodistal seta about 1.9 times longer than endopodal segment and slightly longer than medial seta. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 122K +) lamellate, distinctly wider than long (124×185 μm), unarmed, with concave medial surface. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Chatton & Harant (1924a) +originally described this species based on specimens collected on the Atlantic coast of +France +. Illg & +Dudley (1980) +redescribed it and recorded Banyuls-sur-Mer on the Mediterranean coast of +France +as an additional collection locality. The specimens examined in the present work are identified as +b +. +clavelẚnae +because the form of the caudal rami, the antennule and antenna, and the proportional lengths of the antennal setae and the setae on legs 1-4 all are in accord with those illustrated by Illg & +Dudley (1980) +. +mycnçclavella nana +(reported as +Clavelẚna nana +in the original description) is the only known ascidian host of this copepod. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF27FF33FA93FC71D1981A6E.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF27FF33FA93FC71D1981A6E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..03a6b99813f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF27FF33FA93FC71D1981A6E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola hessei +Chatton & Harant, 1924 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 123 +, +124 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +3 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21539, +1 ♀ +dissected) from +Clavelẚna lepadẚfçrmẚs +(Müller, 1776), Saint-Vaast-la-Hougue, Atlantic coast of +France +, +Monniot +coll. + +; + +4 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21540) from +CK lepadẚfçrm ẚs +, Roscoff, +France + +. + + +Supplementary description of female. +Body eruciform, straight, consisting of cephalosome, 5-segmented trunk, and incompletely 3-segmented genitoabdomen. Body length +2.21 mm +; maximum width 664 μm (across sec- ond pedigerous somite). Cephalosome wider than long. First to fourth pedigerous somites each bearing distinct dorsal tergite; tergites simple, not forming dorsolateral folds; pedigerous somites each bearing pair of large, subglobular interpodal protrusions on ventral surface between left and right legs ( +Fig. 123B +, +124A, B +). Fifth pedigerous somite not articulated from fourth pedigerous somite. Anal somite bearing distinct anal prominence dorsally. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 123C +) slightly divergent, well separated from each other, and clearly articulated from anal somite; each ramus sub-rectangular, unarmed, 2.27 times longer than wide (159×70 μm), gradually narrowing distally, with longer outer and shorter inner margins. Egg sac ( +Fig. 123D +) L- or C-shaped, 2.0× +0.35 mm +in measured sample, containing numerous eggs; each egg about 130 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 123E +) about 135×83 μm, incompletely 2-segmented, gradually narrowing dis- tally; longer proximal segment with 1 small seta distally; distal segment armed with 12 unequal setae and 1 minute spinule, several of distal setae setule-like; longest seta 30 μm long. Antenna ( +Fig. 123F +) about 245×100 μm, indis- tinctly 2-segmented; shorter proximal segment unarmed and unornamented; longer distal segment with rounded distal margin, ornamented with numerous minute spinules on convex anterior surface, and armed with 6 naked setae of lengths 31, 55, 50, 50, 94, and 107 μm, from medial to lateral (setae I-VI), respectively; shortest medial seta po- sitioned at 80% along medial margin of segment. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 123G +) subcircular, smooth, with pair of slender, spinulose palps. Mandible ( +Fig. 123G +) setiform, spinulose, similar to labral palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa ( +Fig. 123H +) with 1 subdistal and 2 distal projections on distal sclerotized part and endite bearing 1 spinulose seta and about 10 thin setules; palmshaped palp ( +Fig. 123I +) with 6 spinulose setae, 5 on distal and 1 on lateral margins, latter seta longer than distal setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 123J +) 2-segmented; proximal segment with 1 large smooth tubercle proximally on medial side and mediodistal endite bearing spinulose process; second segment unequally bifurcate distally, armed with 1 small spine proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + + +FIG. 123. +bnterçcçla hesseẚ +Chatton & Harant, 1924, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, caudal rami, ventral; D, egg sac; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum and mandibles; H, precoxa of maxillule; I, palp of maxillule; J, maxilla; K, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, 0.2 mm; C, K, 0.1 mm; D, 0.5 mm; E, 0.02 mm; F-J, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 124. +bnterçcçla hesseẚ +Chatton & Harant, 1924, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 3. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. + + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of 2-segmented protopod and 1-segmented rami; protopods unarmed. Exopods shorter than endopods: exopods of legs 1, 2, and 3 with rudimentary articulation distally; exopod of leg 3 claw-like ( +Fig. 124B +). Endopods each bearing 2 setae on distal margin, lateral seta longer than medial seta in legs 1-4. Endopodal segment 93×41, 102×48, 102×52, and 91×57 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Distal setae of leg 1 ( +Fig. 124A +) endopod 159 (lateral) and 136 μm (medial), therefore, lateral seta about 1.7 times longer than endopodal segment and 1.17 times longer than medial seta. Distal setae of leg 3 endopod 184 (lateral) and 161 μm (medial). Proportional lengths of distal setae of endopods of legs 2 and 4 similar to those of leg 3. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 123K +) lamellate, smooth, wider than long (267×370 μm); armed with 2 minute setae, separated by distance of about 230 μm. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +In her redescription of this species, +Ooishi (2010a) +mentioned or illustrated that (1) the ventral surface of the metasome bears 4 prominent pairs of interpodal protrusions, (2) the antennule is armed with 12 setae, (3) leg 1 endopod is 2.3 times longer than wide, and (4) the laterodistal seta of leg 1 endopod is 1.2 times longer than the mediodistal seta. These features are almost exactly the same as in our specimens. Some discrepancies, such as the slightly longer caudal rami (2.6 times longer than wide) are minor, while others such as the 5-segmented genitoabdomen in Ooishi’s specimens, may be due to the reproductive state of the material. Both Ooishi’s and our samples of this copepod species were collected from the ascidian +Clavelẚna lepadẚfçrmẚs +in the vicinity of the +type +locality. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF29FF27FA93FB6ED0561BA2.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF29FF27FA93FB6ED0561BA2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2f3025d070d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF29FF27FA93FB6ED0561BA2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,369 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola seticaudus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 131-133 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21544), +3 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21545), and +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +paratypes +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17396) from +mharyngçdẚctyçn caulẚfçrmẚs +Monniot C. +& +Monniot F. +, 1991 (MNHN-IT-2008-6229 = +MNHN +A1 +/ +PHA/7 +); +New Caledonia +, between Île des Pins and +Récif S. +, +SMIB 4 +cruise, +RV +“Alis”, +Stn DW +60 ( +23°00’S +, +167°21.6’E +), depth + +500 m + +, +B. Richer +de Forges-IRD coll., + +10 March 1989 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name refers to the presence of a seta on the caudal rami. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 131A, B +) eruciform, cylindrical, consisting of cephalosome, trunk, and genitoabdomen. Body length +1.42 mm +in dissected largest specimen (other +4 specimens +1.08, 1.32, 1.33, and +1.41 mm +); maximum width 370 μm (across fourth pedigerous somite). Cephalosome much wider than long (212×321 μm), defined from trunk by lateral constriction. Trunk unsegmented, gradually broadening posteriorly, with weak constrictions between somites. First to fourth pedigerous somites each with paired dorsolateral tergal folds; these tergal folds variously developed depending on individuals, usually becoming smaller from anterior to posterior. On ventral surface, each pedigerous somite with pair of interpodal protrusions; protrusions becoming larger from anterior to posterior. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 131C +) 5-segmented; articulations distinct ventrally, but obscure dorsally; anal prominence distinct. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 131D +) inserted close to each other; each ramus about 2.0 times longer than wide (91×45 μm), gradually narrowing distally, with rounded distal margin, and tipped with 1 small, naked seta 28 μm long. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 131E +) tapering, 74 μm long, 2-segmented; articulation between segments in- distinct, but segments clearly defined by width difference; broad proximal segment 54×48 μm, armed with 4 setae distally; small distal segment 23×15 μm, armed with 3 setae (distal seta larger than others). Antenna ( +Fig. 131F +) 144×68 μm, indistinctly 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment longer than proximal segment, armed with 6 naked setae (1 small medial margin and 5 large on distal margin); lengths of setae I-VI (medial to lateral) 24, 55, 70, 83, 97, and 106 μm, respectively; setae V and VI longer than distal segment; medial seta positioned at about 80% along medial margin of segment. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 131G +) sub-rectangular, with patch of spinules on both sides; palp spinulose, curved laterally. Mandible ( +Fig. 131G +) tapering, spinulose, slightly longer than labral palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa and palp: precoxa ( +Fig. 131H +) distally bilobed and strongly sclerotized, with endite bearing 1 slender, spinulose seta and more than 10 long setules: palp ( +Fig. 131I +) with 5 spinulose, spiniform setae on distal margin and 1 shorter seta on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 131J +) 2-segmented; proximal segment with mediodistal endite bearing distally bifurcate and spinulose process; distal segment bluntly bifurcate distally, with 1 small seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each with 2-segmented protopod and unsegmented rami ( +Fig. 131K, L +); protopods with 1 small outer seta on basis. Exopods shorter than endopods in legs 1, 2, and 4, but as long as endopod in leg 3. Endopods 53×37, 61×30, 60×34, and 57×36 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4; outer margin of endopods convex. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae on endopods 106 and 83, 105 and 90, 109 and 85, and 114 and 83 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. All endopodal setae longer than endopodal segment. Laterodistal seta 1.28 times longer than mediodistal seta in leg 1. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 131M +) much wider than long (125×216 μm); armed with 2 small setae on distal margin, separated by distance of 148 μm. + + +Description of male. +Body ( +Fig. 132A +) cyclopiform, narrow, with distinct prosome-urosome division. Body length +1.24 mm +; maximum width 342 μm (across cephalosome). Prosome consisting of cephalosome and first to fourth pedigerous somites. Cephalosome 313 μm long, slightly wider than long, with truncate anterior apex. Fourth pedigerous somite distinctly narrower than anterior somites, with convex lateral margins. Urosome ( +Fig. 132B +) slender, shorter than prosome, consisting of fifth pedigerous somite, genital somite, and 4 abdominal somites. Fifth pedigerous somite 113 μm wide; genital somite 153×112 μm, with well-developed genital opercula ventrally. Four abdominal somites 64×76, 47×71, 45×74, and 29×80 μm, respectively; anal somite shorter than penultimate ab- dominal somite; anal operculum not seen. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 132B +) broad, 1.18 times longer than wide (45×38 μm), armed with 6 pinnate setae; lateral seta shortest. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 132C +) large, 151×78 μm, tapering, slightly constricted near proximal third, with minutely bi- fid apex. Antennule ( +Fig. 132D +) 237 μm long, 7-segmented; first segment broader than other segments; armature formula 12, 2, 3, 0, 2, 1, and 9+aesthetasc; 2 setae on first and 1 on sixth segments pinnate, all other setae naked. Antenna ( +Fig. 132E +) 3-segmented; first segment 82 μm long, armed with 1 naked seta subdistally; second segment as long as first, unarmed, but ornamented with setules along outer margin; third segment about 3.7 times longer than wide (67×18 μm), distinctly narrower than proximal segments, ornamented with setules on proximal outer margin; armed with 5 setae plus claw (29 μm long), subdistal seta 90 μm long, much longer than others. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 132F +) very small, but well-sclerotized. Mandible ( +Fig. 132G +) forming unarmed and unornamented digitiform process. Maxillule ( +Fig. 132H +) 2-segmented; broad proximal segment unarmed; distal segment nearly circular, armed with 6 large, pinnate setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 130I +) lobate, tipped with 1 pinnate seta. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 132J +, +133 +A-C) biramous, with 2-segmented protopod; coxa unarmed; basis with pinnate outer seta; basis of leg 1 with inner distal spine (27 μm long). Leg 1 with 2-segmented exopod and 3-segmented endopod. Legs 2-4 with 3-segmented exopods and endopods. First and second endopodal segments of leg 1 unarmed. Most setae on exopods and endopods geniculate proximally. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 1:0-01-II-0; I, I, 30-0; 0-0; 1, 2, 2
Leg 2:0-01-0I-1; I-1; II, I, 40-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 3
Leg 3:0-01-0I-1; I-1; II, I, 50-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 3
Leg 4:0-01-0I-1; I-1; II, I, 40-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 2
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 132B +) consisting of small lateral seta on somite and small free exopodal segment tipped with 1 small seta. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 132B +) represented by 2 small setae on proximal lateral margin of genital operculum. + + + + +FIG. 131. +bnterçcçla setẚcaudus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, genitoabdomen, ventral; D, caudal rami; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum and mandibles; H, precoxa of maxillule; I, palp of maxillule; J, maxilla; K, leg 1; L, leg 3; M, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, 0.2 mm; C, M, 0.1 mm; D, F, K, L, 0.05 mm; E, G-J, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 132. +bnterçcçla setẚcaudus +sp. nov. +, male. A, habitus, dorsal; B, urosome, ventral; C, rostrum; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, labrum; G, mandible; H, maxillule; I, maxilla; J, leg 1. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C-E, H, J, 0.05 mm; F, G, I, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 133. +bnterçcçla setẚcaudus +sp. nov. +, male. A, leg 2; B, leg 3 exopod; C, leg 4. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. + + + + +Remarks. +The female of +bK setẚcaudus +sp. nov. +can be distinguished from existing congeneric species by the unique setation of its antennule and by the presence of a prominent seta on the caudal ramus. The antennule of the new species is 2-segmented with 4 and 3 setae on the proximal and distal segments, respectively. This setation pattern is unique, although the antennulary armature of female +b +. +ẚanthẚnus +Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +is similar, with 4 setae on the proximal but only 2 setae on the distal segment ( +Ooishi, 2014a +). The presence of a caudal seta was recorded in +b +. +latẚceps +Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +by Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +and in +b +. +ẚanthẚnus +by +Ooishi (2014a) +, but the caudal seta of these two species is very small and spinule-like, unlike +b +. +setẚcaudus +sp. nov. +bnterçcçla latẚceps +and +b +. +ẚanthẚnus +can be distinguished from the new species by additional differences: +b +. +latẚceps +has 2-segmented rami in legs 1-4 (cf. unsegmented in the new species) and +b +. +ẚanthẚnus +carries 2 almost equal distal setae on the endopods of legs 1-4 (cf. unequal). + + +Males of +bnterçcçla +are known in only four species, +b +. +fulgens +, +b +. +fertẚlẚs +Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +, +b +. +gçttçẚ +Conradi, López-González & García-Gómez, 1992 +, and +b +. +sydnẚẚ +Chatton & Harant, 1924 ( +Ooishi, 2011 +). The males of all these species exhibit a uniform segmentation and setation pattern in the swimming legs, and in most other appendages. The most notable features of the male of +b +. +setẚcaudus +sp. nov. +are that the terminal segment of the antenna is armed with 5 setae including 1 large subdistal seta (cf. only 4 small setae in the four congeners), and the armature formula of the antennule, which appears to be species-specific in this genus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF2FFF3DFA93FF10D6241BCF.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF2FFF3DFA93FF10D6241BCF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1ad44814812 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF2FFF3DFA93FF10D6241BCF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola parapterophorus +Marchenkov & Boxshall, 2005 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 129 +, +130 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +3 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21543, +1 ♀ +dissected) from +aẚdemnum +sp. (MNHN-IT-2008-3357 = +MNHN +A2 +/DID.C/322); +Suez +, +Ph. Dollfus +coll., + +22 December 1928 + + +. + + +Supplementary description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 129 +A-C) stout, curved dorsally; body length 873 μm; maxi- mum width 364 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalic shield 164×247 μm, distinctly narrower than trunk, with obscure posterior margin. Trunk unsegmented, but 5 pedigerous somites defined by constrictions; dorsolateral tergal folds absent on first pedigerous somite, but present on second to fourth pedigerous somites. First to fourth pedigerous somites each with single mid-ventral interpodal protrusion between left and right legs, small in first pedigerous somite, but broad in others ( +Fig. 129C +). Genitoabdomen dorsally unsegmented but ventrally 4-segmented. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 129D +) unarmed, 2.47 times longer than wide (74×30 μm), slightly narrowing distally, with rounded distal margin. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 129E +) 1.5 times longer than wide (53×35 μm), widest in middle, with pro- truding posterior margin; armed with 3 small setae distally (setae almost equal, about 9 μm long, but anteriormost thicker than other 2). Antenna ( +Fig. 129F +) 136×64 μm, unsegmented, but with weak wrinkle in middle of lateral side, armed with 5 setae (3 mediodistal and 2 laterodistal), and ornamented with fine spinules just proximal to transverse wrinkle; lengths of setae I-V (medial to lateral) 18, 18, 23, 24, and 28 μm, respectively. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 129G +) circular, ornamented with scattered minute spinules on ventral surface; palps slender proximally, moderately expanded distally, covered with stiff, long setules (or setule-like spinules). Mandible narrower than labral palp, gradually narrowing distally. Maxillule consisting of precoxa ( +Fig. 129H +) and palp ( +Fig. 129I +); sclerotized distal part of precoxa bifurcate distally, with 1 tubercle proximally, 1 patch of minute spinules subdistally; endite of precoxa tipped with 1 spinulose seta and more than 10 stiff setules; palp with 6 spinulose, spiniform setae (1 on lateral margin, 3 on distal margin, and 2 near mediodistal corner). Maxilla ( +Fig. 129J +) 2-segmented; proximal segment with large, tapering mediodistal process covered with spinules distally; distal segment bluntly tipped, with 1 setulose spine subdistally and 1 small seta proximally. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 130 +A-D) each consisting of 2-segmented protopod and unsegmented rami; protopods unarmed. Exopods bearing patch of minute spinules at proximal part of lateral margin. Exopods of legs 1, 2, and 4 tipped with small cusp and with 1 minute spinule subdistally on lateral margin. Endopods 54×28, 53×26, 49×30, and 36×25 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Endopods of legs 3 and 4 with distinctly convex lateral margin. Distal setae on endopods distinctly shorter than the endopodal segments. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae 27 and 19, 24 and 20, 29 and 17, and 25 and 18 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 129K +) lamelliform, unarmed, obliquely wider than long (113×209 μm). + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +This species was described as an associate of the ascidian +aẚdemnum granulatum +Tokioka, 1954 from +Djibouti +coast of the Red Sea. In the original description of this species +Marchenkov & Boxshall (2005) +described or illustrated that (1) the second to fourth pedigerous somites have well-developed dorsolateral tergal folds, (2) the caudal rami are about 2.5 times longer than wide, (3) the antennule is armed with 3 or 4 setae distally, (4) the antenna is armed with 5 setae, (5) the distal setae on the endopods of the swimming legs are distinctly shorter than endopodal segments, and (6) the laterodistal seta on the endopods of the swimming legs is distinctly longer than the mediodistal seta. Our specimens from Suez exhibit the above diagnostic features and there are no significant differences from the original description. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF30FF20FA93FC46D0741B38.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF30FF20FA93FC46D0741B38.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..911cb818911 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF30FF20FA93FC46D0741B38.xml @@ -0,0 +1,250 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola robustus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 138 +, +139 +) + + + + +Type material. +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21550), +1 ♀ +paratype +(MNHN-IU-2014-21551), and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21484) from +ieptçclẚnẚdes +sp.; + + + + +Type +locality. + +Maldives +, N. +Male +atoll, +4km +NW of +Male +I., +OCDN 5247 +-N ( +4°12.88´N +, +73°29.27´E +), depth + +10 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +16 September 1997 + + +. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name reflects the robust body. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 138A, B +) robust, fleshy, curved dorsally; body length 623 μm; maximum width 292 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalosome 131×196 μm, distinctly narrower than trunk, with distinct cephalic shield. First to fourth pedigerous somites defined from one another by lateral constrictions, each somite bearing pair of dorsolateral tergal folds, pair on first pedigerous somite indistinct. First and second pedigerous somites lacking ventral interpodal protrusion; third and fourth pedigerous somites each with single, broad interpodal protrusion ( +Fig. 139B, C +). Genitoabdomen 4-segmented on ventral surface, but lacking traces of segmentation on dorsal surface; anal prominence distinct. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 138C +) unarmed, distinctly articulated from abdomen, about 3.0 times longer than wide (57×19 μm), slightly broadening distally, with rounded distal margin. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 138D +) unsegmented, about 1.5 times longer than wide (38×25 μm), widest in middle with convex posterior margin; armed with 3 setae on apex (anteriormost seta thick and bifurcate). Antenna ( +Fig. 138E +) incompletely 2-segmented; shorter proximal segment unarmed; distal segment about 50×34 μm, orna- mented with patches of fine spinules on concave surface; armed with 6 setae (I-VI), lengths of setae 13, 9, 8, 8, 16, and 22 μm, respectively; medial seta (seta I) and lateral seta (seta VI) thicker than others. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 138F +) sub-circular with spinulose, bulbous palps. Mandible spinulose, narrower than labral palp. Maxillule ( +Fig. 138G +) as usual for genus; endite of precoxa tipped with 1 spinulose seta and several spinules; palp with 5 spinulose spine on distal margin plus 1 naked, slender, spiniform seta on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 138H +) also as usual for genus; distal segment subdistally with 1 spinulose, basally articulated spine on anterior surface and 1 rudimentary seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 biramous with incompletely 2-segmented protopods ( +Fig.139 +A-C); protopods unarmed. Exopods of legs 1, 2, and 4 tipped with small cusp; exopod of leg 3 acutely attenuated ( +Fig. 139B +). Endopods incompletely 2-segmented, armed distally with 2 setae of unequal lengths. Sizes of endopods of legs 1, 3, and 4 (leg 2 pair missing) 46×22, 44×18, and 42×18 μm, respectively. Laterodistal and mediodistal setae on endopods unequal in length (former at least 1.27 times longer than latter), both shorter than endopodal segments, 31 and 24 μm in leg 1, 35 and 25 μm in leg 3, and 33 and 26 μm in leg 4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 138I +) unarmed, obliquely wider than long (94×162 μm). + + + +FIG. 138. +bnterçcçla rçbustus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus. Right; C, caudal ramus; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, labrum; G, maxillule; H, maxilla; I, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C-H, 0.02 mm; I, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 139. +bnterçcçla rçbustus +sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, legs 3 and interpodal protrusion; C, legs 4 and interpodal protrusion, Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. T +he setation of the endopods of the swimming legs of +bK rçbustus +sp. nov. +is unusual because: firstly, the laterodistal seta is longer than the mediodistal seta, and secondly, both setae are shorter than endopodal segment. This combination of character states is shared with only five known species, +b +. +parapterçphçrus +, +b +. +mabulensẚs +sp. nov. +, +b +. +quadrẚsetus +sp. nov. +, +b +. +dẚcaudatus +Marchenkov & Boxshall, 2005 +, and +b +. +sydnẚẚ +. The first three species can be eliminated from further comparison because they have fewer than 6 setae on the antenna (viz. 5 setae in +b +. +parapterçphçrus +and +b +. +mabulensẚs +sp. nov. +and 4 setae in +b +. +quadrẚsetus +sp. nov. +). + + +bnterçcçla sydnẚẚ +is currently known from the Northeastern Atlantic and can be distinguished from +b +. +rçbustus +sp. nov. +by its short caudal rami (which are approximately as long as wide), by the possession of 7 setae on the antennule, by having a slender labral palp, and by having paired interpodal protrusions on each of the first to fourth pedigerous somites ( +Ooishi, 2011 +). +bnterçcçla dẚcaudatus +is known from +Tanzania +and differs from +b +. +rçbustus +sp. nov. +in having an elongate antenna, a digitiform posteroventral process on the genitoabdomen, and a tapering process at the rear margin of the dorsal cephalic shield ( +Marchenkov & Boxshall, 2005 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF32FF2DFA93F91CD7711FDB.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF32FF2DFA93F91CD7711FDB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e8cdebb533f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF32FF2DFA93F91CD7711FDB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola parvus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 140 +, +141 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21552), +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21553), and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21483) from +aẚdemnum psammatçdes +(Sluiter, 1895); Iles Mesha, +Djibouti +, intertidal, +Monniot +coll., + +13 October 1996 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from the Latin +parv +(=small), alluding to the small body size of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 140 +A-C) small, unsegmented, curved dorsally; body length 560 μm; maxi- mum width 200 μm (across cephalosome). Cephalosome partly covered by cephalic shield, wider than trunk, with semicircular median tubercle posterodorsally. First to fourth pedigerous somites each with well-developed dorsolateral tergal folds ( +Fig. 140A +) and single, broad mid-ventral interpodal protrusion between left and right legs ( +Fig. 140B +). First pedigerous somite with large median tubercle dorsally between left and right tergal folds ( +Fig. 140A +), as on cephalosome but larger. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 140D +) short, dorsally unsegmented, but ventrally 3-segmented; anal prominence distinct. Caudal rami unarmed, incompletely articulated from abdomen, originating close to each other; each ramus ( +Fig. 140E +) fusiform, widest in middle, about 2.1 times longer than wide (42×20 μm), with rounded distal margin. + + + +FIG. 140. +bnterçcçla parvus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, habitus dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, habitus, right; D, genitoabdomen, right; E, caudal ramus; F, antennule; G, antenna; H, labrum and mandibles; I, precoxa of maxillule; J, palp of maxillule; K, maxilla; L, leg 5. Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm; D, E, G, K, 0.02 mm; F, H-J, 0.01 mm; L, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 141. +bnterçcçla parvus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, leg 1 and interpodal protrusion; B, leg 3 and interpodal protrusion; C, leg 4 and interpodal protrusion. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 140F +) bulbous, 1.2 times longer than wide (34×28 μm), with narrow proximal part and strongly convex posterior margin; armed with 3 small setae distally. Antenna ( +Fig. 140G +) about twice as long as wide, unsegmented, but with rudimentary partial suture line in middle of lateral margin; ornamented with minute spinules on distal half of concave surface; armed with 6 small setae, at most as long as half width of segment; lengths of setae I-VI (medial to lateral) 15, 11, 11, 13, 12, and 22 μm, respectively; setae II and III, and setae IV and V close to each other. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 140H +) with distally expanded, bulbous palps. Mandible ( +Fig. 140H +) tapering, narrower than labral palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa and palm-shaped palp: precoxa ( +Fig. 140I +) with blunt, sclerotized distal part, 1 tubercle subdistally, and endite near middle; endite tipped with 1 spinulose spine and more than 10 long, stiff setules: palp ( +Fig. 140J +) with 5 spinulose spines on distal margin (medial spine shortest), and 1 naked seta on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 140K +) massive, 2-segmented; proximal segment with 1 spinulose tubercle proximally on medial margin and 1 large mediodistal, spinulose process; distal segment bluntly tipped, with subdistal spinulose process, 1 transverse row of minute spinules in middle of anterior surface, and 1 small seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 each with 2-segmented protopod and unsegmented rami ( +Fig. 141 +A-C); protopods unarmed. Exopods of legs 1, 2, and 4 shorter than endopods, tipped with small cusp; exopod of leg 3 as long as endopod ( +Fig. 141B +), acutely attenuated distally. Endopods 36×18, 36×21, 51×23, and 39×21 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Laterodistal and mediodistal setae on endopods distinctly shorter than endopodal segments, 27 and 24, 25 and 20, 29 and 23, and 28 and 20 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Length ratios of laterodistal to mediodistal setae, 1.13, 1.71, 1.26, and 1.40, respectively, in legs 1-4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 140L +) unarmed, wider than long (82×132 μm). + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +In +b +. +parvus + +sp. nov. + +the antennule is unsegmented and armed with relatively few setae (less than 5), the antenna is armed with 6 setae, and the distal setae on the endopods of legs 1-4 are distinctly shorter than endopodal segments. This combination of features is shared only with three other species: +b +. +dẚcaudatus +, +b +. +mammẚferus +, and +b +. +rçbustus +sp. nov. +These three congeners can be readily distinguished from +b +. +parvus + +sp. nov. + +by distinctive character states. In +b +. +dẚcaudatus +the antenna is elongate (with its setae positioned subterminally), the genitoabdomen bears a large ventral process, the cephalic shield carries a posterodorsal process, and the distal setae on the endopods of legs 1-3 are very small (less than one-third of the length of the endopods) ( +Marchenkov & Boxshall, 2005 +). In +b +. +mammẚferus +the caudal rami are short (wider than long), the antennule is tapering, the 6 setae on the antenna are subequal in length, and the first to fourth pedigerous somites each bear a pair of ventral interpodal protrusions ( +Ooishi, 2010b +). In +b +. +rçbustus +sp. nov. +the body is robust, the caudal rami are 3 times longer than wide, setae IV and V of the antenna are separated from each other, and the mediodistal process on the proximal segment of the maxilla is slender. + + +The presence of the two dorsal tubercles each on the cephalosome and on the first pedigerous somite is a characteristic feature of +b +. +parvus + +sp. nov. + +Similar tubercles are present in +b +. +quadrẚseta +sp. nov. +, but in this species the tubercles are located on the second and third pedigerous somites. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF35FF24FA93F8A6D7AE1C6E.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF35FF24FA93F8A6D7AE1C6E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ae1c8fac55e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF35FF24FA93F8A6D7AE1C6E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola quadrisetus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 134 +, +135 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21546), +3 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21547), and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17397) from +aẚdemnum +sp.; +Tulear +, +Madagascar +, depth + + +15 m + +. + + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species refers to the presence of only 4 setae on the female antenna. + + + + +FIG. 134. +bnterçcçla quadrẚsetus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, habitus, right; D, genitoabdomen, ventral; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum and mandibles; H, palp of maxillule; I, precoxa of maxillule; J, maxilla; K, distal segment of maxilla. Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm; D, 0.05 mm; E, H, I, 0.01 mm; F, G, J, K, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 135. +bnterçcçla quadrẚsetus +sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 3; C, leg 5; D, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, B, D, 0.02 mm; C, 0.05 mm. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 134 +A-C) small, eruciform, curved dorsally, narrowing from anterior to posterior, consisting of cephalosome, 5-segmented trunk, and unsegmented genitoabdomen. Body length of dissected largest specimen 535 μm; maximum width 192 μm (across cephalosome). Cephalosome 125 μm long, much wider than long. First pedigerous somite bearing simple dorsal tergite; second to fourth pedigerous somites each bearing pair of large dorsolateral tergal folds. Second and third pedigerous somites each bearing 1 tubercle in middle of dorsal surface, large on second pedigerous somite and smaller on third ( +Fig. 134A +). Pedigerous somites lacking ventral interpodal protrusions. Genitoabdomen short, flexible, unsegmented, but with 2 or 3 wrinkles on ventral surface ( +Fig. 134D +); anal prominence distinct. Caudal rami unarmed, incompletely articulated from genitoabdomen, about 3.2 times longer than wide (73×23 μm) with parallel lateral margins and rounded distal margin. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 134E +) unsegmented, about 1.5 times longer than wide (37×25 μm), with in- flated, convex posterior margin and nearly straight anterior margin; armed distally with 6 small setae (2 anterodistal setae setule-like). Antenna ( +Fig. 134F +) indistinctly 2-segmented, 2.2 times longer than wide; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment 50×34 μm, slightly shorter than proximal segment, and ornamented with minute spinules; armed with 4 setae, lengths of setae I-IV (medial to distal) 13, 14, 21, and 23 μm, respectively; 2 lateral setae origi- nating close to each other. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 134G +) with sclerotized, angularly protruded lateral margins; palp inflated, bulbous, and spinulose. Mandible ( +Fig. 134G +) spinulose, tapering, distinctly narrower than labral palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa ( +Fig. 134I +) with trilobate distal margin, 1 tubercle subdistally, and endite bearing thin, spinulose seta and about 15 thin setules; palp ( +Fig. 134H +) with 5 spines on distal margin plus setiform process on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 134J +) 2-segmented; proximal segment with mediodistal endite bearing distally spinulose, bifurcate process; distal segment ( +Fig. 134K +) bluntly tipped, subdistally with 1 stout spine bearing numerous spinules on medial surface and 1 small seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 biramous with incompletely 2-segmented protopods and 1-segmented rami ( +Fig. 135A, B +); protopods unarmed. Exopods of legs 1, 2, and 4 tipped with small cusp; exopod of leg 3 attenuated distally ( +Fig. 135B +). Endopods 45×20, 35×24, 30×30, and 38×36 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae on endopods 39 and 33, 35 and 32, 40 and 34, and 33 and 25 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 135C +) lamellate, unarmed, wider than long (82×145 μm). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 135D +) probably represented by 2 small cusps in genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The antenna of female +bnterçcçla +is typically armed with 6 setae, rarely with 5 setae. +bnterçcçla quad- rẚsetus +sp. nov. +is the only known species in the genus having only 4 setae on the antenna, which allows the new species to be easily distinguished from all of its congeners. The possession of a dorsal tubercle on the second and third pedigerous somites is another unusual feature of the new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF36FF23FA93FEE4D5D11C6F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF36FF23FA93FEE4D5D11C6F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3553fd5e69c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF36FF23FA93FEE4D5D11C6F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola mabulensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 136 +, +137 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21548), +1 ♀ +paratype +(MNHN-IU-2014-21549), and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17398) from +aẚdemnum +sp.; NW channel running due +West +from +SMART +resort, +Mabul +, +Malaysia +, +ODHG 1301 +W, depth + +20 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +04 July 2004 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is derived from its +type +locality, Mabul, +Malaysia +. + + + + +Description of female +. Body ( +Fig. 136 +A-C) unsegmented, narrow, cylindrical, curved dorsally, and slightly compressed laterally. Body length 815 μm in dissected largest specimen; maximum width 230 μm (across fourth pedigerous somite). Cephalosome partially covered by cephalic shield; first pedigerous somite also partially covered with tergite. Second to fourth pedigerous somites each bearing well-developed dorsolateral tergal folds; these tergal folds digitiform, with blunt, posteriorly-directed tip in dorsal view ( +Fig. 136A +) but tapering in lateral view ( +Fig. 136C +). Ventral surface of trunk bearing single interpodal protrusion between left and right members of legs 1-4. Genitoabdomen short, obscurely defined from trunk, lacking any trace of articulation; anal prominence distinct. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 136D +) unarmed, 1.53 times longer than wide (49×32 μm), narrowing distally, with rounded distal margin. Egg sac ( +Fig. 136E +) 519×188 μm, slightly curved, containing 2 or 3 rows of eggs; each egg about 130 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 136F +) small, about 1.3 times longer than wide (38×29 μm), widest in proxi- mal third, with straight anterior margin and inflated posterior margin; armed with 5 (1 subdistal and 4 distal) small setae, one distal seta 12 μm long (larger than other setae). Antenna ( +Fig. 136G +) unsegmented, about 115×54 μm, ornamented with minute spinules on convex surface of distal region; armed with 5 minutely spinulose setae, setae at most as long as half width of antenna; lengths of setae I-V: 16, 21, 18, 18, and 27 μm, respectively. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 136H +) almost circular in ventral view; palp distally expanded, bulbous, covered with fine spinules. Mandible spinulose, tapering, much narrower than labral palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa ( +Fig. 136I +) with distal sclerotized part with bluntly bifurcate distal margin and 1 prominent tubercle on medial side; endite bearing 1 spiniform naked seta and more than 10 long setules: palp ( +Fig. 136J +) with 6 spinulose setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 136K +) 2-segmented; proximal segment with mediodistal endite bearing large spinulose process; distal segment with bifurcate distal part, armed subdistally with 1 stout spine bearing numerous spinules on medial surface, plus 1 small seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 consisting of unsegmented protopods and unsegmented rami ( +Fig. 137 +A-C); protopods unarmed. All exopods shorter than endopods: exopods of legs 1, 2, and 4 tipped with small cusp; exopod of leg 3 attenuated ( +Fig. 137B +). Endopods of legs 1 and 2 subdivided by partial suture line on medial side; endopod of leg 4 with distinctly convex lateral margin. Endopods 42×22, 52×24, 47×22, and 35×22 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Laterodistal and mediodistal setae on endopods distinctly shorter than endopodal segments, 27 and 20 μm in leg 1, 25 and 22 μm in leg 2, and 31 and 25 μm in legs 3 and 4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 137D +) unarmed, oval, 127×125 μm, not widened. Leg 6 probably represented by 1 small cusp in genital area ( +Fig. 136L +). + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The antenna of +b +. +mabulensẚs +sp. nov. +is armed with 5 setae, a feature shared with three existing species: +b +. +adnatus +Ooishi, 2014; +b +. +latẚceps +, and +b +. +parapterçphçrus +. These three species can be distinguished from +b +. +mabulensẚs +sp. nov. +by various different features, as follows: +bK adnatus +lacks caudal rami, the antennule is 2- segmented, and the endopodal setae on swimming legs are longer than the endopodal segments ( +Ooishi, 2014a +); +bK latẚceps +has caudal rami that are more than twice as long as wide (about 1.5 times longer in +b +. +mabulensẚs +sp. nov. +), the antennule is armed with as many as 16 setae, and both rami of swimming legs are 2-segmented (Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +); finally, in +bK parapterçphçrus +the caudal rami are more than twice as long as wide, as measured from +Marchenkov & Boxshall (2005 +: + +Fig. +8g + +), and the antenna is 2-segmented. + + +In all species of +bnterçcçla +for which leg 5 is known, this limb is wider than long. The ovoid form of leg 5 of female +b +. +mabulensẚs +sp. nov. +, which is slightly longer than wide, is unusual for the genus and may also serve to distinguish the new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF39FF28FA93F9ADD6EE1E9F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF39FF28FA93F9ADD6EE1E9F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..15022934a94 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF39FF28FA93F9ADD6EE1E9F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,248 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola australis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 144 +, +145 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21555), +7 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21556), and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21473) from +mseudçdẚstçma +sp. (MNHN-IT-2008-7383 = +MNHN +A1 +/ +PSE/45 +); +South Africa +, +Ouderkraal +, SAA 55, depth + +8 m + +, +Griffiths +coll., + +18 August 1994 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from the Latin +austral +(=southern), indicating the location of the +type +locality in +South Africa +. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 144 +A-C) eruciform, depressed, curved dorsally; body length +1.45 mm +; maximum width 650 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Cephalosome 335×509 μm, well-defined from first pedigerous somite. Trunk distinctly segmented; first to fourth pedigerous somites bearing simple, distinct dorsal tergites, without dorsolateral tergal folds. Ventral interpodal protrusions not developed ( +Fig. 144B +). Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 144D +) gradually narrowing posteriorly, unsegmented dorsally but 5-segmented ventrally, with many incomplete transverse rows of minute spinules ( +Fig. 144E, F +); anal prominence distinct, with large anal opening ( +Fig. 142E +). Caudal rami ( +Fig. 144 +D-F) widely separated from each other, slightly divergent, unarmed, about 2.5 times longer than wide (133×54 μm), gradually narrowing distally towards rounded distal margin. + + + +FIG. 144. +bnterçcçla australẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, habitus, left; D, genitoabdomen, ventral; E, posterior part of genitoabdomen, dorsal; F, posterior part of genitoabdomen, ventral; G, antennule; H, antenna; I, labrum (left palp omitted) and mandibles; J, precoxa of maxillule. Scale bars: A-C, 0.02 mm; D, 0.1 mm; E, F, H, 0.05 mm; G, I, J, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 145. +bnterçcçla australẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, palp of maxillule; B, maxilla; C, leg 1; D, leg 2; E, leg 3; F, leg 4; G, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, 0.05 mm; C-G, 0.1 mm. + + + +Rostrum absent.Antennule ( +Fig. 144G +) indistinctly 2-segmented, tapering, 1.47 times longer than wide (100×68 μm); proximal segment with 4 setae and ornamented with scattered minute spinules distally; distal segment small, semicircular, armed with 3 small, setule-like setae on distal margin. Antenna ( +Fig. 144H +) more than twice as long as wide (203×95 μm), obscurely 2-segmented, ornamented with rows of minute spinules on convex surface; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment with 6 naked setae (1 small seta on medial margin and 5 large setae on oblique distal margin); lengths of setae I-VI 27, 93, 93, 109, 125, and 118 μm, respectively; setae III-V geniculate near base; seta I positioned at 70% along medial margin of segment. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 144I +) with 3 patches of spinules on each side; palp spinulose, gradually narrowing distally, not expanded. Mandible ( +Fig. 144I +) spinulose, slender, much narrower than labral palp. Maxillular precoxa ( +Fig. 144J +) with bifurcate distal part; endite tipped with 1 spinulose spine and array of several spinules; palp ( +Fig. 145A +) with 6 spinulose elements including slender lateral seta. Maxilla ( +Fig. 145B +) 2-segmented; mediodistal endite on proximal segment bearing thick, basally articulating, spiniform element; distal segment bifurcate, smooth, with 1 small seta proximally. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 145 +C-F) each consisting of 2-segmented protopod and 1-segmented rami; protopods unarmed. Exopods distinctly shorter than endopods; exopod of leg 3 not elongated. Endopods slender, more than twice as long as wide; 125×49, 139×48, 130×50, and 116×48 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae 143 and 220, 130 and 215, 107 and 214, and 91 and 200 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Laterodistal setae much shorter than mediodistal setae. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 145G +) lamellate, wider than long (127×253 μm), armed with 2 setae (both 56 μm long) on distal margin and ornamented with numerous rows of minute spinules on convex surface; distance between 2 setae 123 μm. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +In +b +. +australẚs +sp. nov. +the laterodistal setae on the endopods of legs 1-4 are distinctly shorter than the mediodistal setae, less than 0.7 times as long as the latter. This is a distinctive feature of the new species, considering that the laterodistal setae are typically longer than the mediodistal setae in +bnterçcçla +species. Only four species, +b +. +cçnẚculus +, +b +. +fulgens +, +b +. +latẚceps +, and +b +. +petẚtẚ +Guille, 1964, are known to diverge from this pattern and are compared with the new species in more detail. + + +Unlike the new species, +b +. +cçnẚculus +lacks caudal rami (a characteristic feature of this species). In +b +. +fulgens +the caudal rami are about 1.6 times longer than wide (cf. 2.5 times in the new species), the antennule is 3-segmented (cf. indistinctly 2-segmented), and the distal setae on the endopods of legs 1-4 are much shorter than the endopodal segments (cf. often longer). In +b +. +latẚceps +the antennule is elongate (cf. not elongate in new species), both rami of legs 1-4 are 2-segmented (cf. 1-segmented), and the antenna is armed with 5 setae (cf. 6 setae). Finally, in the redescription of +b +. +petẚtẚ +by Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +the caudal rami are as long as wide (cf. 2.5 times in new species), the first to fourth pedigerous somites bear tergal folds (cf. absent), and the endopodal segments of legs 1-4 are short, only slightly longer than wide (cf. more than twice as long as wide). + + +Other notable features of +b +. +australẚs +sp. nov. +, are the elongate endopods of legs 1-4 which are more than twice as long as wide, and leg 5 bears relatively large setae. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF3AFF16FA93FBB9D1031AE8.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF3AFF16FA93FBB9D1031AE8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8279757213b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF3AFF16FA93FBB9D1031AE8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,302 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola angustus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 146 +, +147 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21557) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21474) from +aẚdemnum nçcturnum +Monniot F. +& +Monniot C. +, 1997 (MNHN-IT-2008-3178 = +MNHN +A2 +/DID.C/404); +Tanzania +, Site ZAN 02, Morogo bank reef, +6 miles +W of Zanzibar town, +OCDN 3563 +-I ( +06°11.30’S +, +039°07.70’E +), depth + +21 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +19 January 1996 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +angust +(= narrow), referring to the relatively narrow body of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 146 +A-C) eruciform, relatively narrow, unsegmented, curved dorsally; body length +1.05 mm +; maximum width 316 μm (across second pedigerous somite). Posterior part of body from sec- ond pedigerous somite to genitoabdomen gradually narrowing in dorsal and ventral views. Cephalic shield about 175×250 μm, defined from first pedigerous somite only by lateral constrictions, lacking defined posterodorsal mar- gin. Dorsolateral tergal folds small on first pedigerous somite, but prominent in second to fourth pedigerous somites. Third and fourth pedigerous somites each with single, weak ventral interpodal protrusion. Genitoabdomen short, unsegmented; anal prominence ( +Fig. 146D +) well-developed. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 146D +) tapering, unarmed, about 1.9 times longer than wide (73×38 μm). + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule about 1.5 times longer than wide (51×35 μm), bulbous, with narrow proximal part; armed with 5 small setae on apex, longest seta 10 μm. Antenna ( +Fig. 146F +) incompletely 2-segmented, about 2.1 times longer than wide (125×59 μm); proximal segment unarmed, slightly longer than distal segment; distal seg- ment ornamented with minute spinules on concave surface; armed with 6 setae, lengths of setae I-VI (medial to lateral) 18, 19, 14, 21, 22, and 29 μm, respectively; seta I weakly pinnate, positioned at 70% along medial margin of segment; setae II and III close to each other, both widely separated from seta IV. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 146G +) with convex posterior margin and markedly inflated, bulbous palps. Mandible ( +Fig. 146G +) tapering, much narrower than labral palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa ( +Fig. 146H +) with endite tipped with 1 spinulose seta and more than 30 thin, stiff setules; distal sclerotized part of precoxa weakly bifurcate, with 1 blunt tubercle and 1 patch of minute spinules near middle; palp ( +Fig. 146I +) with 2+3 spines on distal margin and 1 naked seta on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 146J +) with bifurcate, spinulose process on endite of proximal segment; distal segment bearing spinulose subdistal process and 1 row of minute spinules on anterior surface; armed with 1 small seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + + +FIG. 146. +bnterçcçla angustus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, habitus, right; D, anal prominence and caudal ramus, right; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum and mandibles, with inset showing left mandible; H, precoxa of maxillule; I, palp of maxillule; J, maxilla; K, leg 1. Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm; D-K, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 147. +bnterçcçla angustus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, leg 2; B, leg 3; C, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, 0.02 mm; C, 0.05 mm. + + + +Legs 1-4 each with incompletely 2-segmented protopod and unsegmented rami ( +Figs. 146K +, +147A, B +); protopods unarmed. Exopods with proximal patch of spinules on lateral margin. Endopods 50×21, 54×26, 52×24, and 51×20 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae 44 and 27, 44 and 25, 50 and 35, and 50 and 30 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Length ratios of laterodistal to mediodistal setae on endopods 1.63:1, 1.76:1, 1.43:1, and 1.67:1, respectively, in legs 1-4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 147C +) unarmed, obliquely wider than long (149×165 μm), with expanded dorsodistal corner. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The endopod of leg 1 of + +b +. +angustus + + +sp. nov. + +carries a laterodistal seta which is distinctly shorter than the endopodal segment, but distinctly longer than the mediodistal seta. Seven species of +bnterçcçla +share these features with + +b +. +angustus + + +sp. nov. + +, as follows: +b +. +parapterçphçrus +, +b +. +quadrẚsetus +sp. nov. +, +b +. +mabulensẚs +sp. nov. +, +b +. +dẚcaudatus +, +b +. +sydnẚẚ +, +b +. +rçbustus +sp. nov. +, and +b +. +parvus + +sp. nov. + + + +The first three of these listed species can readily be distinguished by the presence of 4 or 5 setae on the antenna, compared with 6 setae in +bK angustus + +sp. nov. + +. There are additional differences, such as the antennule of +b +. +parapterçphçrus +is armed with 3 or 4 setae (cf. 5 setae in the new species), the caudal rami of +b +. +quadrẚsetus +sp. nov. +are about 3.2 times longer than wide (cf. 1.9 times), and leg 5 of +b +. +mabulensẚs +sp. nov. +is oval (cf. obliquely wider than long, with expanded dorsodistal corner). + + +The remaining four congeners can be distinguished from + +b +. +angustus + + +sp. nov. + +by the following features: in +b +. +dẚcaudatus +the cephalic shield bears a posterodorsal process, the caudal rami are elongate (about 3 times longer than wide), and the genitoabdomen bears a large ventral process ( +Marchenkov & Boxshall, 2005 +); in +b +. +sydnẚẚ +, the caudal rami are short (as long as wide), the antennule is armed with 7 setae, and the first to fourth pedigerous somites each bear a pair of ventral interpodal protrusions ( +Ooishi, 2011 +); in +b +. +rçbustus +sp. nov. +the body is robust, the caudal rami are 3 times longer than wide, the antennule is armed with 3 setae, and the third and fourth pedigerous somites each bear a large interpodal protrusion on the ventral surface, and in +b +. +parvus + +sp. nov. + +the body is small (560 μm long), the first and second pedigerous somites each bear a large dorsal tubercle, the antennule is armed with 3 setae, and the maxilla bears a spinulose tubercle proximally on the medial margin of the proximal segment. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF3FFF2BFA93FD7DD76D18AB.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF3FFF2BFA93FD7DD76D18AB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..04f921a638d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF3FFF2BFA93FD7DD76D18AB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,295 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Enterocola tuberculatus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 142 +, +143 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21554) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-21472) from +mçlysyncratçn cerebellum +Monniot F. +& +Monniot C. +, 2001 (MNHN-IT-2008-7078 = +MNHN +A2 +/ +POL/96 +); +Papua New Guinea +, +CRCHO 262 +, +Brooker Ils. +, +Louisiades +, +Site Brooker +CH ( +11°03.09’S +, +152°28.62’E +) depth + +12 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +01 June 1998 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name alludes to the presence of a large dorsal tubercle on the first pedigerous somite of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 142 +A-C) eruciform, curved dorsally; body length 760 μm, maximum width 244 μm (across cephalic shield). Cephalic shield with obscure posterior margin. First pedigerous somite with weak tergal folds posterolaterally, but with large mid-dorsal projection ( +Fig. 142A +); second to fourth pedigerous somites each with pair of large, lamellate dorsolateral tergal folds and single, broad ventral interpodal protrusion between left and right legs. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 142D +) short, unsegmented dorsally, but 4-segmented ventrally, with distinct anal prominence. Caudal rami elongate, unarmed, originating close to each other; each ramus ( +Fig. 142D +) about 3.5 times longer than wide (102×29 μm), slightly broadened proximally, with rounded distal margin. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 142E +) unsegmented, more than twice as long as wide (approximately 39×18 μm), with rounded distal margin, nearly parallel anterior and posterior margins; armed with 5 small setae at antero- distal corner. Antenna ( +Fig. 142F +) incompletely 2-segmented, 2.34 times longer than wide (103×44 μm); proximal segment unarmed; distal segment as long as, but narrower than, proximal segment, and ornamented with fine spinules on concave surface; armed with 5 setae, lengths of setae I-V 17, 12, 12, 17, and 25 μm; medial seta (seta I) spinulose and distinctly thicker than other 4 setae; setae II and III positioned close to each other. + + +Labrum destroyed; palp ( +Fig. 142G +) spinulose, bulbous, markedly inflated in distal half. Mandible ( +Fig. 142H +) spinulose, slender, much narrower than labral palp. Maxillule as usual for genus; distal sclerotized part of precoxa ( +Fig. 142I +) weakly bilobed; endite of precoxa tipped with 1 spinulose spine and more than 10 stiff setules; palp ( +Fig. 142K +) armed with 5 spines on distal margin and 1 naked seta on lateral margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 142L +) 2-segmented; proximal segment with unarticulated, spinulose mediodistal process; distal segment distally bifurcate, with 1 minute seta proximally on posterior surface. Maxilliped absent. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 142M +; +143 +A-C) each consisting of incompletely 2-segmented protopod and unsegmented rami; protopods unarmed. Exopods of legs 1, 2, and 4 with pointed distal tip and minute cusp subdistally on lateral margin; exopod of leg 3 elongate ( +Fig. 143B +) and thin distally. Endopods 51×35, 48×22, 55×27, and 48×20 μm, respec- tively, in legs 1-4. Enodpods of legs 3 and 4 with convex lateral margin. Lengths of laterodistal and mediodistal setae on endopods 68 and 49, 59 and 47, 65 and 52, and 68 and 59 μm, respectively, in legs 1-4. Laterodistal setae on endopods longer than endopodal segments, 1.39, 1.26, 1.25, and 1.15 times longer than mediodistal setae on legs 1-4, respectively. Leg 5 ( +Fig. 143D +) unarmed, wider than long (98×167 μm). + + + +FIG. 142. +bnterçcçla tuberculatus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, habitus dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, habitus, right; D, genitoabdomen, right; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labral palp; H, mandible; I, distal part of maxillular precoxa; J, endite of precoxa of maxillule; K, palp of maxillule; L, maxilla; M, leg 1. Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm; D, 0.05 mm; E, G, H, J, K, 0.01 mm; F, I, L, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 143. +bnterçcçla tuberculatus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, leg 2; B, leg 3; C, leg 4; D, leg 5. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. + + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The most conspicuous feature of + +b +. +tuberculatus + + +sp. nov. + +is the presence of a large dorsal tubercle on the first pedigerous somite, which serves to differentiate the new species from its congeners. The presence of any dorsal tubercles or projections has been recorded in only three species: there is a tapering posterior projection on the cephalic shield in +b +. +dẚcaudatus +(see +Marchenkov & Boxshall, 2005 +), there are 2 tubercles (one each on the second and third pedigerous somites) in +b +. +quadrẚsetus +sp. nov. +, and 2 tubercles (one each on the cephalosome and first pedigerous somite) in +b +. +parvus + +sp. nov. + + + +The caudal rami of + +b +. +tuberculatus + + +sp. nov. + +are elongate, 3.2 times longer than wide. This is another potential diagnostic feature of the new species, because in other species of +bnterçcçla +the length/width ratio of the caudal rami seldom exceeds 3.0. The exceptions are +b +. +bẚlamellatus +Sars, 1921 +, +b +. +dẚcaudatus +, +b +. +quadrẚsetus +sp. nov. +, and +b +. +rçbustus +sp. nov. +all of which have caudal rami with a length to width ratio of about 3. These four species are easily separated from + +b +. +tuberculatus + + +sp. nov. + +by their lack of a dorsal tubercle on the first pedigerous somite. + + +The antenna of +bK tuberculatus + +sp. nov. + +is armed with 5 setae. This feature is shared with some varieties of +b +. +fulgens +and by four other species, +b +. +adnatus +, +b +. +latẚceps +, +b +. +parapterçphçrus +, and +b +. +mabulensẚs +sp. nov. +( +Table 6 +). All of these species also lack any dorsal tubercles or projections. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF40FF5FFA93F8AFD5521CFB.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF40FF5FFA93F8AFD5521CFB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fb25614df62 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF40FF5FFA93F8AFD5521CFB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma pygmaeum + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 109 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21522, dissected and mounted on a slide) from + +Cystçdytes +dellechẚaje ẚ + +( + +Della Valle + +, 1877); +New Caledonia +, +Récif Neobumki +, + +1 mile +North + +of passe +de Kouaré +, +Stn NC +31, depth + +10- 40m + +, +Monniot +coll., + +10 March 1987 + +. + + + + + +FIG. 109. +eaplçstçma pygmaeum + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, genitoabdomen, dorsal; D, right caudal ramus, dorsal; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum; H, mandible; I, maxilliped; J, leg 1; K, leg 5; L, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C, 0.05 mm; D-G, I-L, 0.02 mm; H, 0.01 mm. + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Greek +pygm +(=a fist), alluding to the fist-like distal armature on exopods of legs 1-4. + + + + +Description of female +. Body ( +Fig. 109A, B +) eruciform, robust, dorsoventrally depressed, divisible into cephalosome, 4-segmented metasome, and 2-segmented genitoabdomen. Body length +1.10 mm +; maximum width 512 μm (across third metasomite). Cephalosome 231×296 μm, clearly defined from and distinctly narrower than first meta- somite; metasome gradually broadening posteriorly; 4 metasomites well-defined from one another. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 109C +) 172×183 μm; genital apertures large, positioned dorsolaterally. Abdomen strongly tapering, 1.9 times wider than long. Caudal rami convergent, small; each ramus ( +Fig. 109D +) wider than long (25×28 μm), armed with 6 setae (2 rudimentary, papilliform). + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 109E +) 2-segmented, 76 μm long; broad proximal segment with 2 setae; nar- rower distal segment less than half length of proximal segment, armed with 12 setae and 1 aesthetasc.Antenna ( +Fig. 109F +) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment as long as proximal segment, about 2.6 times longer than wide (37×14 μm); armed with 4 spines (proximal 2 small and transparent, distal 2 broad, with serrate distal margin). + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 109G +) with convex posterior margin bearing thin, transparent fringe. Mandible ( +Fig. 109H +) as elongate lobe tipped with 1 small seta. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 109I +) robust, 4-segmented; first segment broad but unarmed; second segment much wider than long, with 1 small, blunt seta mediodistally; third and fourth segments small, unarmed; terminal claw small and simple. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 109J +) consisting of protopod and exopod, but lacking articulation: protopod unarmed; endopod absent. Exopod digitiform, armed distally with subglobular, fist-like element articulated from exopodal segment at base, and bearing 1 small, claw-like process on outer margin and ornamented with about 10 spinules (or denticles) on anterior surface; no seta or spine present on exopod. Legs 2-4 as leg +1 in +shape and armature. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 109K +) located on posteroventral surface of last metasomite; present as small knob tipped with 1 broad, blunt seta and 1 thin, longer seta. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 109L +) represented by 1 small spine and 2 spiniform processes on genital operculum; 5 minute denticles present posterior to leg 6, and row of 5 spinules present lateral to leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The taxonomic position of +eaplçstçma pygmaeum + +sp. nov. + +seems to lie close to the boundary between +eaplçstçma +and the related genus +eaplçsaccus +Chatton & Harant, 1924. In the original description of +eaplçsaccus +given by +Chatton & Harant (1924c) +, three characters were highlighted as diagnostic features for the new genus: (1) the caudal rami are extremely reduced; (2) the antenna is armed with a strong distal claw; and (3) the exopods of legs 1-4 have a terminal hook. In retaining distinct caudal rami and in the presence of 4 spines on the last segment of the antenna, the new species seems better placed in +eaplçstçma +. The peculiar form of the exopod of legs 1-4, which bears only the fist-like terminal element, is a distinctive autapomorphy of +e +. +pygmaeum + +sp. nov. + +We infer that this exopod is derived from the single spine-bearing +type +of exopod, as found in +eaplçstçma +. + + + +Genus + +Haplosaccus +Chatton & Harant, 1924 + + + + + + +Diagnosis +(female). Body eruciform or vermiform, unsegmented. Genitoabdomen defined by its narrowness; genital apertures positioned dorsolaterally, with copulatory pore on ventral surface. Caudal rami vestigial. Rostrum present or absent. Antennule short, at most 2-segmented, armed with setae. Antenna 2- or 3-segmented; terminal segment armed distally with 1 claw only, or 1 claw plus 1 spine, or 2 spines. Labrum present. Mandible absent, or represented by 1 seta or as digitiform, distally bilobed process. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped consisting of 4 segments plus terminal claw. Legs 1-4 same in form and armature, consisting of unarmed protopod plus rami; exopod distally with 1 strong claw or bifurcate spine, with or without 1 seta on outer margin; endopod variably defined. Leg 5 represented by 1 small seta or absent. Leg 6 represented by 1 spine and 1 spiniform process on genital operculum, accompanied with 5 dentiform elements. + + + + + +Type +species. + +eaplçsaccus sacculus +( +Chatton & Brément, 1910 +) (originally as +Aplçstçma sacculus +) by original designation. + + + + +Remarks. +The discovery of +eaplçsaccus ardẚus +sp. nov. +described below, raises uncertainty about the generic position of +e +. +elçngatus +Ooishi & Illg, 1977. The most important diagnostic features of +eaplçsaccus +seem to be the presence of a strong terminal claw on the antenna and on each of the exopods of legs 1-4. The +type +species +e +. +sacculus +and +e +. +ardẚus +sp. nov. +share these features, but +e +. +elçngatus +does not. It seems possible that +eK elçngatus +should be transferred to another genus, possibly +eaplçstçma +, but this must await re-examination of the +type +material. The major morphological differences between these three species, their known hosts and their distributions are given in +Table 5 +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF44FF54FA93FDEDD54E1B5C.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF44FF54FA93FDEDD54E1B5C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5b97ec30c96 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF44FF54FA93FDEDD54E1B5C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma symbioticum + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 105 +, +106 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21520) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(MNHN-IU-2014-17387, dissected) from +ieptçclẚnẚdes +sp. (MNHN-IT-2008-4855 = +MNHN +A2 +/ +LEP/108 +); +Baluan Is. +, +Papua New Guinea +, +CRCHO 555 +( +02°32.27’S +, +147°17.97’E +), depth + +15 m + +, Colin-CRRF coll., + +23 June 2003 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from the Greek +symbẚç +(=living together), referring to its co-occurrence together with +e +. +mammẚferum +sp. nov +. in the same genus of host in the same geographic region. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 105A, B +) small, slightly dorsoventrally depressed; consisting of cephalosome, 4-segmented metasome, and small genitoabdomen. Body length 723 μm; maximum width 270 μm (across last metasomite). Cephalosome 125×188 μm, narrower than first metasomite; metasome gradually broadening posteriorly; articulations between metasomites incomplete, but each metasomite distinctly defined by constrictions. Compound last metasomite with broad dorsal protrusion in middle ( +Fig. 105B +). Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 105C +) 146×136 μm, obscurely defined from metasome, indistinctly 2-segmented ( +Fig. 105D +), with short posterior somite (free abdomen). Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 105D +) about 1.6 times longer than wide (34×21 μm), armed with 2 blunt setae (1 dorsal and 1 distal); distal seta specialized (with expanded proximal and slender distal halves), giving caudal ramus apparent 2-segmented condition. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 105E +) as short, convex protrusion. Antennule ( +Fig. 105F +) small, stout, 43 μm long, incompletely 3-segmented; armed with 1, 3, and 4 small setae on first to third segments, respectively. Antenna ( +Fig. 105G +) 3- segmented including short first segment (coxa); second segment as long as wide, unarmed; third segment twice as long as wide (24×12 μm); armed with 3 spines, 2 larger distal spines each bearing 1-3 spinules subdistally. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 105H +) broad, with nearly parallel lateral margins, convex posterior margin with slightly angular apex; narrow sclerotization stripe present along posterolateral borders. Mandible, maxillule, and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 105I +) robust, 3-segmented; first segment much wider than long, unarmed; second segment (basis) wider than long, unarmed, with 1 spinulose tubercle near mediodistal corner; third segment (endopod) short, unarmed; terminal claw stout, with tooth-like process on inner proximal surface. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 106 +A-D) each consisting of protopod, exopod, and semicircular endopod. Exopods armed with 1 seta plus 4 spines in leg 1, 1 seta plus 3 spines in leg 2, and 1 seta plus 2 spines in legs 3 and 4. Spines on exopods with 1 to several spinules subdistally. Two distal spines on exopods fused at base, appearing as single bifurcate spine. Endopods of legs 1-4 distinct. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 106E +) as small papilla-like lobe tipped with 2 setae. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 106F +) represented by 2 groups (each group enclosed with hyaline material) of 3 dentiform processes; additional 5 smaller dentiform elements present near leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +eaplçstçma symbẚçtẚcum +sp. nov. +may be differentiated from other congeneric species by the characteristic form and armature of its caudal ramus which bears 1 simple dorsal seta and 1 proximally expanded distal seta. The presence of only 3 spines on the antenna is also an unusual feature within +eaplçstçma +, because only +e +. + + +gẚbberum +( +Schellenberg, 1922 +) was recorded as having 3 spines, although the latter species is not similar to the new species in other respects. + + + +FIG. 105. +eaplçstçma symbẚçtẚcum +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, left; C, genitoabdomen, dorsal; D, abdomen, dorsal; E, cephalic region, ventral; F, antennule; G, antenna; H, labrum; I, maxilliped. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C, E, 0.05 mm; D, F-I, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 106. +eaplçstçma symbẚçtẚcum +sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 2; C, leg 3; D, leg 4; E, leg 5; F, genital aperture. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + +In having a proximal seta on the exopods of legs 1-4, +e +. +symbẚçtẚcum +sp. nov. +belongs to subgroup 1 as defined by +Ooishi (2004b) +. Members of this subgroup generally have simple spines on the exopods of legs 1-4, with the exception of two species, +e +. +mẚnutum +and +e +. +setẚferum +, described by Ooishi & Illg (1977), both of which have the two terminal spines on the exopods fused at base, thus appearing as one bifurcate spine, as in +e +. +symbẚçtẚcum +sp. nov. +In +e +. +mẚnutum +and +e +. +setẚferum +the caudal ramus bears 3 or more armature elements, the antenna bears 4 armature elements, and the protopods of legs 1-4 bears an outer seta. These differences serve to distinguish both of them from the new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF46FF52FA93F9F8D5741BA5.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF46FF52FA93F9F8D5741BA5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..61daaf53d89 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF46FF52FA93F9F8D5741BA5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma simplex + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 107 +, +108 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(intact, MNHN-IU-2014-21521) from +Cẚtçrclẚnum labçuteẚ +Monniot F. +& Millar, 1988; +New Caledonia +, +UA281 +, depth + +33 m + +, + +August 1986 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +sẚmpl +(=simple), referring to the simplified armature of legs and the loss oral appendages. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 107 +A-C) maggot-shaped, slightly dorsoventrally depressed; body length +1.18 mm +, maximum width 427 μm (across second metasomite). Cephalosome ( +Fig. 107D +) indistinctly defined from metasome, narrower than metasome; 4 metasomites defined by weak constrictions. Last metasomite bearing 3 broad lobes along posterodorsal margin. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 107E +) small, unsegmented, occupying only about 8% of body length, obscurely defined from metasome; genital apertures not seen, probably concealed by posterodorsal lobes of last metasomite. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 107F +) small, 1.23 times longer than wide (27×22 μm), rounded distally, originating on ventral surface of genitoabdomen; armed with 2 small setae (1 outer and 1 distal). + + + +FIG. 107. +eaplçstçma sẚmplex +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, left; C, habitus, ventral; D, cephalosome, ventral; E, genitoabdomen, dorsal; F, right caudal ramus, ventral; G, antennule; H, antenna, distal; I, labrum. Scale bars: A-C, 0.2 mm; D, E, 0.05 mm; F, G, I, 0.02 mm; H, 0.01 mm. + + + + +FIG. 108. +eaplçstçma sẚmplex +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilliped; B, leg 1; C, distal part of exopod of leg 1, outer. + + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 107D +) small, wider than long, with convex posterior margin. Antennule ( +Fig. 107G +) unsegmented, with partial suture line subdistally, armed with 8 small, blunt setae. Antenna ( +Fig. 107H +) 2-segmented; proximal segment plate-like, broad, short, and unarmed; distal segment with 2 spines (trifurcate distal and bifurcate subdistal), 1 rudimentary seta at distal third, and 1 row of minute spinules near middle. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 107D, I +) small, slit-like, unornamented. Mandible, maxillule, and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 108A +) consisting of 4 segments plus terminal claw; all segments unarmed and unornamented; first segment platelike, much broader than other segments; terminal claw short, curved. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 108B +) consisting of protopod and exopod. Protopod lacking outer seta. Exopod tapering, not articulated from protopod, armed with 1 small seta on outer margin and 1 spine distally; distal spine ( +Fig. 108C +) bifurcate, with ventral and dorsal branches, bearing 1 small setule in middle of outer surface. Endopod not defined. Legs 2-4 same as leg +1 in +form and armature. Legs 5 and 6 not seen. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +eaplçstçma sẚmplex +sp. nov. +may readily be distinguished from its congeners by the armature of legs 1-4. All of the legs are identical: each has 1 outer seta and 1 distal, bifurcate spine on the exopod. Across all species of +eaplçstçma +this is the smallest known number of armature elements on the legs; for example, all other species are known to have at least 4 armature elements on the exopod of leg 1. The distal spine of the exopod of each leg is specialized; it is bifurcate with dorsal and ventral branches (not inner and outer branches as is typical) and it bears a setule on its outer surface. + + +eaplçstçma sẚmplex +sp. nov. +exhibits several other unusual features, including the lack of the mandible and leg 5, the possession of small caudal rami bearing only 2 simple setae, and the presence of 2 spines and 1 rudimentary seta on the antenna. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF4DFF5DFA93FC2FD7761A5B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF4DFF5DFA93FC2FD7761A5B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ba59c6d5f54 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF4DFF5DFA93FC2FD7761A5B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplosaccus ardius + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 110 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21523), +6 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21524) and +2 ♀♀ +para- types (dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17388) from +aẚdemnum mçlle +(Herdman, 1886); near +Ouaco +, +Koumac Sector +, +New Caledonia +, +LAGON +cruise, +RV +“Alis”, +Stn DW +919 ( +20°52.2’S +, +164°25.2’E +), depth + +17 m + +, +B. Richer +de Forges- IRD coll., + +26 April 1988 + +. + + + + + +Etymology +. The name is derived from the Greek +ard +(=arrowhead), reflecting the arrowhead-like rostrum of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 110A +) vermiform, unsegmented, gradually narrowing anteriorly; body length +2.96 mm +, maximum width +0.64 mm +(at level of leg 4). Cephalosome not defined from metasome; 4 metasomites recognizable by weak lateral constrictions. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 110B +) 164×297 μm, not articulated from metasome, but defined by abrupt narrowing, unsegmented but divisible into broader anterior two-thirds and narrower posterior third, with convex rear margin. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 110C +) vestigial, 12×6 μm, constricted in middle, tipped with 1 minute seta. Egg sac containing 10 rows of eggs; each egg about 160 μm in diameter. + + +Cephalic appendages very small. Rostrum ( +Fig. 110D +) 24×13 μm, minute, but well-sclerotized, arrowheadshaped with pointed apex. Antennule ( +Fig. 110E +) 19 μm long, shorter than wide, 2-segmented, armed with 2 and 8 setae on first and second segments, respectively. Antenna ( +Fig. 110F +) 2-segmented; proximal segment slightly longer than wide, unarmed; distal segment 2.25 times longer than wide (18×8 μm), armed distally with 1 inner claw and 1 outer spine. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 110G +) strongly tapering posteriorly towards rounded apex. Mandible ( +Fig. 110G +) represented by broad seta lateral to labrum. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 110H +) consisting of 4 segments plus terminal claw; first segment unarmed, second segment as long as wide, with 2 small setae; narrower third and fourth segments unarmed; terminal claw acutely pointed, slightly longer than fourth segment. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 110I +) consisting of protopod, short exopod and semicircular endopod; protopod lacking outer seta; exopod incompletely defined from protopod, armed with 1 seta on outer margin and strong claw distally; endopod unarmed but with pair of minute sensilla. Legs 2-4 exactly same as leg +1 in +shape and armature. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 110B +) represented by 1 minute seta located ventrolaterally on posterior part of metasome. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 110J +) represented by 1 spine and 1 larger, spiniform process on genital operculum; 5 spiniform internal elements accompanying leg 6. + + + +FIG. 110. +eaplçsaccus ardẚus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, ventral; B, urosome, ventral; C, caudal ramus; D, rostrum; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum and left mandible; H, maxilliped; I, leg 1; J, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, 0.2 mm; B, 0.1 mm; C-J, 0.01 mm. + + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +In having a strong terminal claw on the antenna and on the exopods of legs 1-4, the new species belongs to the genus +eaplçsaccus +which currently consists of only two known species, +e +. +sacculus +and +e +. +elçngatus +. The most significant diagnostic features of +eK ardẚus +sp. nov. +are: the antenna is armed terminally with 1 strong claw and 1 spine, and the exopods of legs 1-4 are armed with 1 outer seta and 1 strong terminal claw. These features clearly differentiate the new species from its two congeners (see +Table 5 +for more detailed comparison). + + + +Genus + +Haplostomella +Chatton & Harant, 1924 + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Female: Body eruciform or vermiform, usually unsegmented, but occasionally indistinctly divisible into cephalosome, metasome, and genitoabdomen. Cephalosome discernible by weakly developed cephalic shield. Metasome incorporating fifth pedigerous somite, sometimes with lobate dorsolateral folds in same plane as legs 1-5. Genitoabdomen not articulated from metasome, consisting of broad genital and narrow abdominal regions. Genital apertures large, positioned dorsolaterally; genital operculum bearing 3 teeth on inner side of distal border. Caudal rami distinct, armed with up to 5 setae. Rostrum not developed. Antennule small, 1- or incompletely 2-segmented, but exceptionally 4-segmented in +eaplçstçmella magellanẚca +( +Chatton & Brément, 1910 +). Antenna basically 3-segmented, with unarmed first segment, 1 seta on second segment, and 3 setae and 1 lobate element on third segment. Labrum broad, simple, or occasionally with lobes on posterior margin. Mandible absent or consisting of lobe tipped with distal element(s); distal element(s) variable with species, either spine, claw, or 1 or 2 setae. Maxillule absent. Maxilla indistinctly 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment with 1 or 2 setae. Maxilliped broad, chelate, and consisting of 2 segments plus terminal claw; proximal segment (syncoxa) unarmed; distal segment (basis) bearing inner distal protrusion and acute spine on anteromedial surface; terminal claw short, directed between distal protrusion and spine of second segment. Legs 1-4 consisting of unsegmented protopod, exopod and endopod; protopod with seta on outer margin; exopod distally bilobed, with sclerotized, claw-like anterior lobe and rounded posterior lobe tipped with 1 setule; endopod not articulated from protopod, unarmed. Ventrolateral surface of body lateral to legs 1-4 sometimes with 1 to 5 tubercles. Leg 5 as small lobe tipped with 2 or 3 setae. + + +Male +: Body cyclopiform, distinctly segmented, clearly divisible into prosome and urosome. Prosome consisting of cephalosome and first to fourth pedigerous somites. Urosome 6-segmented, consisting of fifth pedigerous somite, genital somite, and 4 abdominal somites. Caudal ramus with 6 setae; 2 median terminal setae (setae IV and V) long, fringed with membrane along both margins. Antenna 7- or 8-segmented; proximal segments each with 1 large aesthetasc. Antenna and labrum as in female. Mandible, maxillule, and maxilla vestigial or absent. Maxilliped similar to that of female. Legs 1-4 biramous, consisting of coxa, basis, exopod, and endopod. Setation variable with species: coxa with or without inner seta: basis with outer seta; inner distal element on leg 1 present or absent. Exopod 3-segmented. Endopod 1- to 3-segmented in leg 1, and 3-segmented in legs 2-4. Leg 5 consisting of 1 lateral seta on fifth pedigerous somite and free or lobate exopod tipped with 2 setae. Leg 6 represented by 1 or 2 setal elements on genital operculum + + + + + +Type +species. + +eaplçstçmella malacçcera +Chatton & Harant, 1924, by original designation. + + + + +Remarks. +Marchenkov & Boxshall (2003) +recognised 11 valid species in the genus +eaplçstçmella +, including their new species, +e +. +bçrealẚs +Marchenkov & Boxshall, 2003 +. +Boxshall & Halsey (2004) +regarded +eaplçstçmella +as the first offshoot within the family +Botryllophilidae +because its male lacks many of the synapomorphies that are shared by the males of +Bçtryllçphẚlus +, +eaplçstçma +and +eaplçstçmẚdes +, such as the presence of the rosette of densely packed aesthetascs on the proximal segment of the antennule. The female of +eaplçstçmella +is distinctive within the family in the form of its antenna, maxilliped, and swimming legs. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF4EFF47FA93F8B4D6461D8B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF4EFF47FA93F8B4D6461D8B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..47183880b33 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF4EFF47FA93F8B4D6461D8B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostomella bilobata + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 112 +, +113 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21526), +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21527), and +2 ♀♀ +, +1 ♂ +paratypes +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17389) from + +Apl +ẚdẚum + +sp.; +Kerguelen Islands +, no other collection data. + + + + + +FIG. 111. +eaplçstçmella + +tuberculata +(Chatton & Harant, 1924) + +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, posterior part of body, dorsal; C, posterior part of body, left; D, caudal rami, dorsal; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum; H, mandible; I, maxilla; J, maxilliped; K, leg 1; L. leg 5. Scale bars: A, 0.2 mm; B, C, 0.1 mm; D, 0.05 mm; E-L, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 112. +eaplçstçmella bẚlçbata +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, right; B, habitus, dorsal; C, genitoabdomen, dorsal; D, right caudal ramus, ventral; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum; H, maxilla; I, maxilliped; J, leg 1; K, leg 5; L. genital aperture. Scale bars: A, B, 0.2 mm; C, 0.1 mm; D-K, 0.02 mm; L, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 113. +eaplçstçmella bẚlçbata +sp. nov. +, male. A, habitus, dorsal; B, urosome, ventral; C, right caudal ramus, dorsal; D, maxilliped; E, leg 1; F, leg 2; G, leg 3; H, leg 4. Scale bars: A, 0.1 mm; B, 0.05; C-H, 0.02 mm. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name alludes to the presence of a pair of lobes on the labrum of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 112A, B +) eruciform, consisting of unsegmented anterior part and short abdomen. Body length +2.04 mm +; maximum width 496 μm (across region of leg 4). Anterior half of body slightly tapering anteriorly; cephalosome narrower than metasome, incompletely defined from metasome by posterolateral margins of cephalic shield. Cylindrical metasomal region incorporating leg 5, with 5 pairs of small dorsolateral folds; last pair at level of leg 5 much smaller than anterior 4 pairs. Genital somite completely fused to metasome; paired genital apertures ( +Fig. 112L +) positioned dorsolaterally. Genital operculum bearing 3 teeth inside. Abdomen ( +Fig. 112C +) tapering, 3-segmented, but articulation incomplete between last 2 somites. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 112D +) about 2.9 times longer than wide (69×24 μm), slightly longer than anal somite, with 5 subequal, naked setae (1 lateral and 4 distal); lateral seta positioned at 63% of ramus length. Egg sac ( +Fig. 112B +) 1.40× +0.34 mm +; each egg about 115 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 112E +) 100 μm long, 2-segmented; proximal segment with 9 setae; distal seg- ment small, only 17 μm long, subdivided in middle, with 5 setae and 1 short aesthetasc; all setae naked. Antenna ( +Fig. 112F +) indistinctly 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment with 1 seta on inner margin, 1 short, blunt seta plus 1 lobate process subdistally, and tipped with 1 seta. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 112G +) short and broad, characteristically with pair of large lobes on posterior margin. Mandible and maxillule absent. Maxilla ( +Fig. 112H +) distinctly 2-segmented; broad proximal segment unarmed; distal segment shorter and narrower than proximal segment, distally armed with 2 setae; outer seta pinnate, small medial seta naked and located on tip of digitiform process of segment. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 112I +) consisting of 2 segments plus terminal claw; proximal segment broad and unarmed; distal segment as long as wide, with short medial margin and longer outer margin, bearing 1 broad, plate-like process and 1 acute spine near mediodistal corner; terminal claw stout with bicuspid tip. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 112J +) consisting of protopod, exopod, and endopod; protopod obscurely defined at medial side, with 1 seta on outer margin; exopod distally bilobed, anterior lobe claw-like, with bicuspid tip, posterior lobe tipped with 1 small seta; endopod large, semicircular, more than twice as wide as exopod, and ornamented with rows of minute spinules. Legs 2-4 same as leg 1. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 112A, K +) as rudimentary lobe tipped with 2 small setae. + + +Description of male. +Body ( +Fig. 113A +) narrow, cyclopiform, clearly segmented, with distinct prosome-urosome division. Body length 809 μm. Maximum width of body 205 μm across third pedigerous somite. Prosome consisting of cephalosome and 4 pedigerous somites. Urosome ( +Fig. 113B +) 6-segmented, consisting of fifth pedigerous somite, genital somite and 4-segmented abdomen. Genital somite as long as wide. Four abdominal somites 50× +70m +50×61, 36×50, and 23×43 μm, respectively. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 113C +) rectangular, 2.24 times longer than wide (38×17 μm), armed with 6 setae (1 small outer, 1 dorsal, and 4 broad distal). + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule 7-segmented; armature on segments uncertain due to many setae missing. Antenna as in female. Labrum, mandible, maxillule, and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 113D +) 2-segmented; proximal segment short and unarmed; distal segment 1.5 times longer than wide, with 1 spine subdistally and 1 small lobe at mediodistal corner; terminal claw strongly curved, with bicuspid tip. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 113 +E-H) biramous, consisting of coxa, basis, exopod, and endopod. Coxa unarmed; basis with outer seta; basis of leg 1 additionally with inner distal spine. Exopods 3-segmented in all swimming legs. Endopods 1-segmented in leg 1, but 3-segmented in legs 2-4. All setae on swimming legs geniculate proximally, and all spines fringed with broad membranes bilaterally. Endopod of leg 1 and third exopodal segment of leg 2 with bicuspid outer distal corner. Third exopodal segment of legs 3 and 4 with tricuspid outer distal corner. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 113B +) represented by free exopod tipped with 2 unequal setae. Leg 6 represented by 1 seta on distolateral apex of genital operculum. + + + + +Remarks. +Species of +ealçstçmella +seldom bear any lobes on the labrum in the female. The only known exception is +eK magellanẚca +( +Chatton & Brément, 1910 +) in which the labrum bears 2 pairs of lobes, as illustrated by +Chatton & Brément (1910) +. Therefore, +eK bẚlçbata +sp. nov. +can be distinguished from all other species of the genus by the possession of a single pair of lobes on the female labrum. Other diagnostic features of the female of +e +. +bẚlçbata +sp. nov. +include: (1) the abdomen is 3-segmented, a feature shared only with +e +. +australẚensẚs +Gotto, 1970 +; (2) the antennule is distinctly 2-segmented, which is a unique feature of the new species; (3) the mandible is absent, a feature shared only with +e +. +reducta +Ooishi & Illg, 1977; and (4) the maxilla is distinctly 2-segmented and armed with 2 setae on its distal segment, a feature shared only with +e +. +bçrealẚs +. The combination of these diagnostic features serves to characterize the new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF4EFF5CFA93FF10D7D61B93.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF4EFF5CFA93FF10D7D61B93.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..519dfce6d4e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF4EFF5CFA93FF10D7D61B93.xml @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostomella tuberculata +(Chatton & Harant, 1924) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 111 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +33 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21525, +2 ♀♀ +dissected) in +Aplẚdẚum nçrdmannẚ +Milne Edwards, 1841; +Greece +, Stn 486, +Koukouras +coll., date unknown + +. + + + + +Redescription of female. +Body ( +Fig. 111A +) eruciform, consisting of cephalosome, cylindrical metasome, and small genitoabdomen. Body length +2.36 mm +, maximum width 545 μm (across anterior third): cephalosome 190×290 μm, incompletely separated from metasome, but distinctly defined by its narrowness. Metasome unsegmented, lack- ing any constriction, with 5 pairs of small dorsolateral folds (vestiges of tergites), each pair located at level of leg pair (legs 1 to 5). Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 111B, C +) tapering, unsegmented, not articulated from metasome, occupying about 16% of body length, with narrow posterior half; genital apertures positioned dorsolaterally; genital operculum large, rounded, with 3 strong denticles. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 111D +) incompletely articulated from abdomen, narrowing distally, 2.64 times longer than wide (95×36 μm); armed with 4 distinct setae (3 distal and 1 dorsal) and 1 small setule located midway along outer margin. + + +Rostrum short with convex posterior margin. Antennule ( +Fig. 111E +) incompletely 2-segmented, about 2.2 times longer than wide, bearing 16 setae; all setae characteristically small, setule-like, subequal in length. Antenna ( +Fig. 111F +) indistinctly 3-segmented and curved ventrally; first segment longest but unarmed; second segment distally bearing 1 small seta and 1 row of several spinules; third segment bearing 1 subdistal and 2 distal, small setae, 1 spinulose lobate process subdistally, and patch of spinules in middle. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 111G +) short, unornamented, with broadly convex posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 111H +) 1- segmented, digitiform, with 2 weak swellings on medial margin, and tipped with 1 naked seta. Maxillule absent. Maxilla ( +Fig. 111I +) 1-segmented, with 2 weak swellings on subdistal medial margin, tipped with 1 weakly pinnate seta. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 111J +) robust, consisting of 2 segments plus terminal claw; proximal segment (syncoxa) much broader than long, unarmed; distal segment (basis) as long as wide, bearing 1 spine and 1 spinulose, lobate process at mediodistal corner, and ornamented with numerous minute spinules on outer (ventral) surface; terminal claw pointed distally and directed between mediodistal process and spine of distal segment. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 111K +) consisting of unsegmented protopod, exopod and endopod. Intercoxal plate absent. Protopod broad, with 1 seta on outer margin. Exopod bilobed; anterior lobe claw-like, sclerotized, pointed distally, bearing small, mammiform subdistal process; posterior lobe broader than anterior, rounded distally, tipped with 1 small setule. Unarmed endopod broader than long, broader than exopod, with slightly concave distal margin. Legs 2-4 same as leg 1. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 111B, C, L +) as small lobe tipped with 3 small, naked setae. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The above specimens are identified as +eK tuberculata +on the basis of the close agreement between these specimens and the original description of this species given by +Chatton & Harant (1924a) +, as follows: (1) the metasome bears 5 pairs of small dorsolateral folds (vestiges of tergites); (2) the form of the genitoabdomen in lateral view is the same as illustrated in the original description; (3) the antennule is incompletely 2-segmented and armed with equally small setae; (4) the caudal ramus bears 4 distal setae; (5) the mandible and maxilla are each tipped with 1 seta; and (6) leg 5 bears 3 setae. +Chatton & Harant (1924a) +gave a measurement of +1.5 mm +for the body length of the +type +specimens; this is significantly shorter than +2.36 mm +for our measured specimen. This length difference can probably be explained by variation in the state of maturity of the material: +Chatton & Harant (1924a) +mentioned that the +type +specimens were immature females. In addition, we have observed that females of +eaplçstçmella +are highly elastic and will swell up gradually when immersed in lactic acid for study. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF50FF42FA93FF10D0591A5B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF50FF42FA93FF10D0591A5B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ce611dd6b38 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF50FF42FA93FF10D0591A5B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostomella multinodosa + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 117 +, +118 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21531) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(MNHN-IU-2014-17392, dissected) from +oẚtterella rubra +Abbott +& +Trason +, 1968; +British Columbia +, +Canada +, seapool rocks ( +48°49’N +, +125°12’15”W +), depth + +40 m + +, +Pennachetti +coll., date unknown. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from the Latin +mult +(=many) and +nçd +(=swelling), and alludes to the presence of multiple interpodal tubercles associated with legs 1-4. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 117A +) eruciform, unsegmented, slightly curved dorsally; body length +1.85 mm +; maximum width 429 μm (in middle). Anterior part of body tapering anteriorly; cephalosome partially defined by posterolateral margins of cephalic shield. Metasomal region lacking any division, with 5 pairs semicircular dorsolateral folds, each pair located at level of legs 1-5, respectively: last pair of folds smaller than anterior 4 pairs. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 117B +) short, occupying less than 20% of body length, unsegmented, not demarcated from metasome, strongly tapering; genital apertures ( +Fig. 118D +) large, positioned dorsolaterally; genital operculum bearing 3 teeth distally and row of 4 denticles on ventral side. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 117C +) 2.0 times longer than wide (40×20 μm), gradually narrowing distally; armed with 5 setae (1 on outer margin, 1 subdistal dorsal, and 3 distal); seta on outer margin smaller than other caudal setae and positioned at 65% length of ramus. Egg sac ( +Fig. 117D +) about 1.57× +0.41 mm +, containing multiseriate eggs; each egg about 180 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 117E +) about 85 μm long, unsegmented, with traces of 3 weak articulations along posterior side; armed with 15 setae (3 distal setae larger than others). Antenna ( +Fig. 117F +) broad, 3-segment- ed; first segment unarmed; second segment wider than long, with short outer and longer inner margins, and with 1 seta at inner distal corner; third segment 1.5 times longer than wide, with 1 setiform process, 2 setae (including very small one) and 1 spinulose lobe. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 117G +) much wider than long, unornamented, with concave posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 117H +) consisting of segment plus strong, straight distal spine bearing 1 row of spinules distally. Maxillule absent. Maxilla ( +Fig. 117I +) unsegmented, but divisible into broad proximal and narrower distal parts; armed with 2 setae (1 apical and 1 subapical). Maxilliped ( +Fig. 117J +) broad, 2-segmented; proximal segment very broad, unarmed; distal segment with several patches of minute spinules on posterior surface ( +Fig. 117K +), bluntly protruded mediodistal corner, and 1 acutely pointed spine on anteromedial surface; terminal claw with bicuspid tip. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 117L +) consisting of protopod, exopod, and endopod. Protopod bearing 1 small seta on outer margin, 1 short tubercle on posterior margin between rami, and 4 tubercles at inner distal corner. Exopod with bifurcate anterior lobe and rounded posterior lobe lacking distal seta. Endopod wider than long, with 1 large tubercle on anterior surface. Ventral lateral surface of body lateral to leg 1 bearing 1 tubercle. Ventral surface of body between left and right legs 1 bearing 10 rounded interpodal tubercles (replacing intercoxal plate). Leg 2 ( +Fig. 118A +) similar to leg 1, except bearing 2 distal tubercles on endopod (large outer and small inner). Leg 3 same as leg 2. Leg 4 ( +Fig. 118B +) similar to leg 2, except bearing 9 interpodal tubercles and 2 small tubercles at inner distal corner of endopod. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 118C +) as tapering, rudimentary lobe, wider than long, tipped with 2 small setae. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +eaplçstçmella multẚnçdçsa +sp. nov. +is a very distinctive species, readily distinguishable from all of its congeners by the possession of the characteristic, multiple interpodal tubercles between left and right members of legs 1-4 of the female. These can be observed without dissection and it is likely these tubercles are derived from the transformed intercoxal plate. Tubercles are also present at the inner distal corner of protopods (invariably 4) and on the endopods (1 on leg 1 and 2 on legs 2-4). As additional diagnostic features of the new species, the ventral body surface lateral to each of legs 1-4 bears a single tubercle (a feature shared with +e +. +unẚserẚata +sp. nov. +), the mandible bears a strong spine, and the body is unsegmented, lacking any trace of segmentation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF52FF4EFA93FB94D6251ED7.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF52FF4EFA93FB94D6251ED7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4bbc07f1e08 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF52FF4EFA93FB94D6251ED7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,234 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostomella binodosa + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 119 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21532), +5 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21533), and +2 ♀♀ +para- types (dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17393) from + +Cystçdytes +rçseçlus + +Hartmeyer +, 1912 (MNHN-IT-2008-2602 = +MNHN +A3 +/ +CYS/4 +); +Dakar +, +Senegal +, +Stn +17, dredge, I.F.A.N. coll., + +21 January 1941 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from Latin +bẚ +(=two) and +nçdus +(swelling) and refers to the presence of double tubercles on the ventral body surface lateral to legs 1-4. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 119A +) eruciform, relatively small, curved dorsally, with 4 pairs of dorsolateral folds, 1 each at level of legs 1-4. Body length +1.01 mm +; maximum width +0.21 mm +. Ventral surface of body bearing 4 short, blunt protrusions, between left and right members of each leg pair ( +Fig. 119A +). Cephalosome defined from metasomal region by posterolateral margins of cephalic shield. Genitoabdomen not defined from metasomal region; genital apertures large, positioned dorsolaterally; genital operculum ( +Fig. 119M +) bearing 3 teeth along distal border and 1 palm-like element on ventral side bearing 5 digits. Abdomen defined from genital region only by weak constriction, unsegmented but with slight constriction in middle; dorsoposterior region of abdomen bearing row of minute spinules on each side of anal slit ( +Fig. 119C +). Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 119C +) about 2.3 times longer than wide (36×16 μm), with 1 outer and 4 distal setae; outer seta positioned at 55% of ramus length. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 119D +) stout, unsegmented, almost as long as wide, with 5 setae (including 1 large seta) on anterior side and 7 setae (including 2 larger setae) on distal margin.Antenna ( +Fig. 119E +) incompletely 2-segmented; proximal segment bearing 1 seta at inner distal corner; distal segment short, slightly longer than wide, with 1 blunt process, 1 leaf-like lobe, and apical seta. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 119F +) with concave posterior margin and protruded, unequally bilobed posterolateral corners. Mandible ( +Fig. 119G +) consisting of short, lobate segment and recurved, hook-like distal spine bearing few small spinules distally. Maxillule absent. Maxilla ( +Fig. 119H +) incompletely 2-segmented; broad proximal segment unarmed; narrower distal segment tipped with 1 seta. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 119I +) broad, 2-segmented; proximal segment much broader than long, unarmed; distal segment as long as wide, bearing mediodistal protrusion and medial spine; terminal claw with transverse unsclerotized region in middle, representing trace of articulation between endopod and claw; with bicuspid tip. + + + +FIG. 119. +eaplçstçmella bẚnçdçsa +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, right; B, genitoabdomen, dorsal; C, caudal rami, dorsal; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, labrum; G, mandible; H, maxilla; I, maxilliped; J, leg 1; K, leg 2; L, leg 5; M, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, 0.1 mm; B, 0.05 mm; C, 0.02 mm; D-M, 0.01 mm. + + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 119J +) with broad protopod bearing 1 seta on outer margin, 1 large tubercle at inner distal corner, and several rows of minute spinules on anterior surface. Exopod bilobed; anterior lobe claw-like, bicuspid at tip; posterior lobe tipped with 1 setule. Endopod shorter and narrower than exopod, distinctly articulated from protopod, unornamented, with rounded distal margin. Ventral surface of body lateral to leg 1 bearing 2 globular tubercles. Leg 2 ( +Fig. 119K +) similar to leg 1, but inner distal tubercle on protopod bilobed, and endopod broader and weakly bilobed. Legs 3 and 4 same as leg 2. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 119L +) rudimentary, as small lobe tipped with 2 setae. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Three major diagnostic features of +eK bẚnçdçsa +sp. nov. +differentiate it from its congeners, as follows: (1) the distal element of the mandible is a hook-like, recurved spine; (2) the inner distal corner of the protopod of legs 1-4 bears a tubercle which is simple in leg 1, but bilobed in legs 2-4; and (3) legs 1-4 are accompanied by a pair of tubercles positioned on the ventrolateral surface of body lateral to each leg. The first of these features was previously recorded only in +e +. +çceanẚca +. The second feature, the inner distal tubercle or protrusion on the protopod of legs 1-4 has been recorded in several species of +eaplçstçmella +, but only +e +. +unẚserẚata +sp. nov. +is comparable with +e +. +bẚnçdçsa +sp. nov. +in sharing a small, clearly defined tubercle (in other species the protrusion is large and not clearly defined from the protopod). The third diagnostic feature, the number of tubercle(s) on the ventral surface lateral to legs 1-4 is variable according to species and has been recorded or illustrated as +4 in +e +. +australẚensẚs +, +e +. +dẚstẚncta +, and +e +. +halçcynthẚae +; +3 in +e +. +çceanẚca +; 2 or +3 in +e +. +ççẚshẚae +sp. nov. +, and +1 in +e +. +unẚserẚata +sp. nov. +and +e +. +multẚnçdçsa +sp. nov. +Therefore, the new species can be distinguished from its congeners by the combination of the above three diagnostic features. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF55FF47FA93FECDD62D1AAF.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF55FF47FA93FECDD62D1AAF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8665cd64f49 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF55FF47FA93FECDD62D1AAF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,228 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostomella uniseriata + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 114 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21528) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(MNHN-IU-2014-17390, dissected) from +bxçstçma ẚanthẚnum +(Sluiter, 1909); +Chuuk Island +, +OCDN 0900 +-M ( +07°25.29’N +, +151°49.02’E +), depth + +4 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +11 November 1992 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species refers to the uniseriate arrangement of eggs within its egg sac. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 114A +) vermiform, cylindrical, curved dorsally, and unsegmented; body length +1.53 mm +, maximum width 250 μm. Cephalosome ( +Fig. 114B +) 136×163 μm, narrower than metasomal re- gion, and incompletely defined from metasomal region by posterolateral margins of cephalic shield. Metasomal region bearing 5 pairs of dorsolateral folds at levels of legs 1-5, respectively, last pair smaller than anterior 4 pairs. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 114C +) not defined from metasome; genital apertures large, positioned dorsolaterally; genital operculum with 3 teeth distally and 1 small palm-like element bearing 6 digits on ventral side ( +Fig. 114N +). Abdomen ( +Fig. 114C +) not articulated from, but distinctly defined from metasomal region by its narrowness, slightly longer than wide (67×62 μm). Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 114D +) 1.9 times longer than wide (30×16 μm), almost rectangular, armed with 5 naked setae, 1 at middle of outer margin and 4 distally; largest distal seta 28 μm long, about twice as long as other 3. Egg sac ( +Fig. 114E +) 590×155 μm, containing 5 or 6 uniseriate eggs; each egg about 125 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 114F +) small, unsegmented, 64 μm long, armed with 7 setae on anterior margin and 6 setae plus 3 short aesthetascs on distal margin; 1 seta on distal margin more than twice length of other setae. Antenna ( +Fig. 114G +) unsegmented, slender, curved, with 1 process-like seta subdistally on inner margin, plus 1 blunt process, 1 spinulose lobe and 1 seta distally. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 114H +) simple, semicircular. Mandible ( +Fig. 114I +) unsegmented, lobate, tipped with elongate, acutely pointed spine. Maxilla ( +Fig. 114J +) unsegmented, but consisting of short and broad proximal part and narrow digitiform distal part bearing 1 weakly pinnate seta subdistally. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 114K +) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment with 1 spine and 1 blunt process mediodistally; and ornamented with several rows of minute spinules on posterior surface; terminal claw simple. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 114L +) consisting of protopod, exopod, and endopod. Intercoxal plate ( +Fig. 114L +) present between left and right legs, not sclerotized but distinct and broad, ornamented with several rows of minute spinules on anterior surface. Protopod bearing 1 seta on outer margin and 1 tubercle at inner distal corner. Exopod small, distinctly articulated from protopod, and distally bilobed; anterior lobe sclerotized and distally bifurcate; posterior lobe subcircular, tipped with 1 seta. Endopod well-defined, almost rectangular, longer than wide, with truncate and slightly bilobed distal margin. Legs 2-4 same as leg 1, but distal margin of endopods weakly trilobed. Legs 1-4 accompanied by small tubercle on ventral surface of body just lateral to each leg ( +Fig. 114A, L +). + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 114M +) as small lobe bearing 1 minute seta subdistally and 2 naked setae on distal margin. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The distal armature element on the mandible of +e +. +unẚserẚata +sp. nov. +is a slender, straight spine by which the new species can be distinguished from its congeners, since in other species of +eaplçstçmella +the distal element is a robust claw in +e +. +bçrealẚs +; a curved spine in +e +. +dẚstẚncta +Ooishi & Illg, 1977 and +e +. +çceanẚca +Ooishi & Illg, 1977; a strong, spinulose blade in +e +. +halçcynthẚae +( +Fukui +, 1965); a single seta in +e +. +dubẚa +Ooishi & Illg, 1977, +e +. +magellanẚca +, +e +. +malacçcera +, and +e +. +tuberculata +; and it is absent in +e +. +reducta +. The mandible of +eK australẚensẚs +is unknown, but it has a large body size, +6.5 mm +long in the female, a 3-segmented abdomen, and 2 distal setae on the maxilla ( +Gotto, 1970 +), which serve to distinguish it from the new species. + + +Egg sacs are known in only five species of the genus +eaplçstçmella +, and all of these species have a multiseriate arrangement of eggs. The uniseriate arrangement of eggs in the egg sac of +eK unẚserẚata +sp. nov. +also seems to be an unusual feature within the genus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF57FF45FA93FF10D1481AAF.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF57FF45FA93FF10D1481AAF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..62072d920e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF57FF45FA93FF10D1481AAF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,220 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostomella ooishiae + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 115 +, +116 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21529), +3 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21530), and +2 ♀♀ +para- types (dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17391) from + +Apl +ẚdẚum calẚfçrnẚcum + +( +Ritter +& +Forsyth +, 1917) (MNHN-IT-2008- 242 = +MNHN +A1 +/ +APL +.B/200); +British Columbia +, +Canada +, +Pennachetti +coll. + + + + + +Etymology. +This new species is named in honor of the late Dr. Shigeko Ooishi, who contributed enormously to the taxonomy of ascidicolous copepods. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 115A, B +) vermiform, unsegmented, slightly compressed laterally, with 5 pairs of dorsolateral folds at levels of legs 1-5. Body length +2.80 mm +; maximum width +0.48 mm +(in middle); maximum dorsoventral depth +0.58 mm +. Body surface ornamented with numerous rows of fine spinules ( +Fig. 115C +). Cephalosome weakly defined from rest of body by dorsolateral constriction. Posterior third of body straight or curved dorsally, gradually narrowing posteriorly; abdominal part variable in relative length. Genitoabdomen or abdomen not defined. Genital apertures ( +Fig. 116E +) large; genital operculum with 3 small internal teeth distally and row of 6 denticles on ventral side. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 115C +) divergent, nearly rectangular, about 2.35 times longer than wide (54×23 μm); armed with 5 setae (1 on outer margin and 4 distally; outer margin seta shorter than others and positioned at 58% of ramus length). + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 115D +) strongly tapering, 90×48 μm, incompletely 2-segmented; proximal seg- ment with 3 vestigial suture lines along posterior side and armed with 10 setae (including 2 large setae) plus 2 aesthetascs; small distal segment armed with 4 setae, distal seta longer and broader than other 3. Antenna ( +Fig. 115E +) 3-segmented; first segment longest but unarmed; second segment quadrate, incompletely articulated from first, with 1 seta at inner distal corner; third segment distinctly articulated from second, bearing 2 short, nipple-shaped setae, 1 spinulose lobe and 1 naked seta. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 115F +) simple, unornamented, with slightly concave posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 115G +) consisting of short segment and whip-like (but not flexible) distal spine. Maxillule absent. Maxilla ( +Fig. 115H +) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment shorter and narrower than proximal, tipped with 1 weakly pinnate seta. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 115I, J +) 2-segmented; proximal segment much wider than long, unarmed; distal segment slightly longer than wide, with 1 blunt process and 1 pointed spine mediodistally; terminal claw with bicuspid tip. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 116A +) consisting of unsegmented protopod, exopod and endopod. Protopod with seta on outer margin, plus large mediodistal protrusion with bilobed apex. Exopod distally bilobed; anterior lobe claw-like and bicuspid at tip; posterior lobe flexible, unarmed. Endopod longer than wide, distally bilobed. Legs 2 and 3 similar to leg 1, but distal margin of endopod trilobed ( +Fig. 116B +). Leg 4 similar to leg 1, but with 1 seta on tip of posterior lobe of exopod (this seta absent in legs 1-3). Legs 1-4 each accompanied laterally by 2 or 3 tubercles (1 anterior and 2 posterior) on ventral surface of body ( +Figs. 116 +A-C), posterior 2 lobes always present, but anterior lobe present or absent, and variable in size. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 116D +) as small lobe tipped with 2 setae of unequal length. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +In species of +eaplçstçmella +the inner distal corner of the protopod of legs 1-4 can be variously protruded, as follows: (1) a large expansion in +e +. +australẚensẚs +, which +Gotto (1970) +interpreted as representing an inner lobe of the endopod; (2) a broad protrusion in +e +. +dẚstẚncta +Ooishi & Illg, 1977, which was also interpreted as an inner lobe of the endopod by Ooishi & Illg (1977) and by +Marchenkov & Boxshall (2003) +; (3) a bilobed protrusion in +e +. +malacçcera +, which was illustrated by +Chatton & Harant (1924a) +; and (4) a tubercle in +e +. +unẚserẚata +sp. nov. +In +eK ççẚshẚae +sp. nov. +the inner distal corner of the protopod of legs 1-4 bears a large, distally-bilobed protrusion, similar to that of +e +. +malacçcera +. The latter species is known from the Mediterranean and differs from +e +. +ççẚshẚae +sp. nov. +in having a clearly defined abdomen, as illustrated by +Chatton & Harant (1924a) +, a 2-segmented antenna, and no dorsolateral folds on the metasomal region. + + +The presence in leg 4 only of a distal seta on the posterior lobe of the exopod (the seta is absent in legs 1-3) seems to be the most remarkable distinguishing feature of +e +. +ççẚshẚae +sp. nov. +, because all known +eaplçstçmella +species possess this seta on the posterior lobe of the exopods of legs 1-4. In addition, the shape of the distal spine on the mandible is characteristically distally attenuated, curved, and whip-like, although it is stiff, not flexible. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF58FF49FA93FB9DD1231E2F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF58FF49FA93FB9DD1231E2F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e8a7ff0d2c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF58FF49FA93FB9DD1231E2F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + +Family + +Enteropsidae +Aurivillius, 1885 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Female: Body eruciform or vermiform, unsegmented or indistinctly segmented, generally lacking prosome-urosome division, consisting of cephalosome, metasomal trunk, and short genitoabdomen. Trunk consisting of first to fifth pedigerous somites. Caudal rami reduced; caudal setae reduced in number or absent. Rostrum absent or weakly developed. Antennule small, at most 4-segmented. Antenna up to 4-segmented, usually 1- or indistinctly 2-segmented, but 3- or 4-segmented in +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa +gen. nov. +and +merẚbçẚa +gen. nov. +Labrum unarmed, or armed with 2 to 8 setiform processes; labrum with setiform palps in +bnterçcçla +van Beneden, 1860, +bnterçcçlẚdes +Chatton & Harant, 1922, and +iequerrea +Chatton & Harant, 1924; palps absent in other genera. Mandible as powerful claw in +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa +gen. nov. +and +merẚbçẚa +gen. nov. +, or setiform element in +bnterçcçla +and +bnterçcçlẚdes +, or absent in other genera. Maxillule consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa bearing up to 3 setae or processes and endite tipped with 1 seta; palp armed with up to 6 setae. Maxilla 2-segmented; proximal segment (syncoxa) unarmed or bearing endite tipped with 1 seta or spiniform element; distal segment (basis) armed with up to 3 setae or processes. Maxilliped absent. Legs 1-4 biramous, consisting of protopod and 1- or 2-segmented rami. Protopods typically 2- segmented; coxa unarmed; basis occasionally with outer seta. Exopods and endopods rudimentary in +bnterçpsẚs +Aurivillius, 1885 +and +Mychçphẚlus +Hesse, 1865. Endopods armed distally with 1 or 2 setae in +bnterçcçla +and +Mçn- nẚçtẚcçpa +gen. nov. +Endopods of legs 3 and 4, or of all swimming legs, unarmed in +bnterçcçlẚdes +and +iequerrea +. Leg 5 absent or represented by large lamellate lobe. + + +Male +: Body cyclopiform, consisting 5-segmented prosome and 6-segmented urosome. Prosome comprising cephalosome and first to fourth pedigerous somites. Caudal rami broad, armed with 6 setae. Rostrum well-developed. Antennule 6- or 7-segmented. Antenna of +bnterçcçla +3- or 4-segmented, consisting of coxobasis (or coxa and basis) and 2-segmented endopod; coxa and first endopodal segment unarmed; basis with 1 seta; second endopodal segment with 4 or 5 setae plus claw.Antenna of +Mychçphẚlus +reduced, 2-segmented. Labrum rudimentary. Mandible absent or as small, digitiform process. Maxillule 2-segmented, armed with 3 (in +Mychçphẚlus +) or 6 (in +bnterçcçla +) setae on distal segment. Maxilla lobate, tipped with 1 seta. Maxilliped absent. Legs 1-4 biramous, with 2-segmented protopods. Coxae unarmed. Basis with outer seta; inner distal spine present (in +bnterçcçla +) or absent (in +Mychçphẚlus +). Leg 1 exopod 2-segmented; other rami 3-segmented in legs 1-4. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 1:0-01-II-I (1-0); I, I, 30-0; 0-0 (0-1); 1, 2, 2
Leg 2:0-01-0I-1; I-1; II, I, 40-1; 0-2 (0-1); 1, 2, 3
Leg 3:0-01-0I-1; I-1; II, I, 50-1; 0-2 (0-1); 1, 2, 3
Leg 4:0-01-0I-1; I-1; II, I, 40-1; 0-2; 1, 2, 2
+ +Leg 5 represented by 1 lateral seta plus small exopod tipped with 1 seta; or leg 5 represented by 2 isolated setae. +Leg 6 absent or represented by 2 setae on genital operculum. + + + + +Type +genus. + +bnterçpsẚs +Aurivillius, 1885 +by original monotypy. + + +Other included genera +. +Mychçphẚlus +Hesse, 1865, +bnterçcçla +van Beneden, 1860, +bnterçcçlẚdes +Chatton & Harant, 1922, +iequerrea +Chatton & Harant, + +1922 +I + +Mçnnẚçtẚcçpa +gen. nov +., and +merẚbçẚa +gen. nov +. + + + + +Remarks. +In their revision, Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +recognized two subfamilies of their ascidicolid cluster as especially closely related, the Enteropsinae (comprising +bnterçpsẚs +and +Mychçphẚlus +) and the Entercolinae (comprising +bnterçcçla +, +bnterçcçlẚdes +, and +iequerrea +). All five genera were included in a single family, the +Enteropsidae +, by +Boxshall & Halsey (2004) +because of the numerous synapomorphies exhibited, particularly between males of +Mychçphẚlus +and +bnterçcçlaK +The adult male of +bnterçcçla +had been known since +Canu (1892) +but the adult male of +Mychçphẚlus +was first described by +Gotto et al. (1984) +only after Illg & Dudley’s landmark study. In the present work two new genera are established and all seven genera can be distinguished using the following key. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF5CFF4CFA93FC6CD0191ED7.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF5CFF4CFA93FC6CD0191ED7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..de270b6f8f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF5CFF4CFA93FC6CD0191ED7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostomella crassa + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 120 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21534) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(MNHN-IU-2014-17394, dissected) from +Synçẚcum flçrẚferum +Monniot, F. +& +Monniot, C. +, 2006 (MNHN-IT-2018-18 = +MNHN +A1 +/ +SYN/116 +); +Sainte Luce, SW +Îlot Souillac, +Madagascar +, +ATIMO VATAE +expedition, Stn +TA36 +( +24°45´S +, +47°12´E +), +MNHN +coll., + +04 June 2010 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from the Latin +crass +(= thick) and alludes to the relatively broad body of the female. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 120A, B +) eruciform, relatively small and stout, distinctly segmented; body length 957 μm; maximum width 330 μm. Cephalosome nearly triangular, 158×231 μm, incompletely articulated from metasome. First to fifth pedigerous somites well-defined from one another, similar in width. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 120C +) distinctly articulated from fifth pedigerous somite, 4-segmented, consisting of genital somite and indistinctly 3-segmented abdomen. Genital somite much wider than long; genital apertures large, positioned dorsolaterally; genital operculum bearing 3 teeth on mediodistal margin. First abdominal somite broad; second and third abdominal somites much narrower than first. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 120D +) divergent, about 2.2 times longer than wide (69×31 μm), bearing 4 small setae distally. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 120E +) indistinctly 2-segmented, 107 μm long, twice as long as wide; proximal segment unarmed, but ornamented with 2 rows of minute spinules proximally; short distal segment occupying about 20% length of antennule, obscurely articulated from first segment, but defined by abrupt narrowing; armed with 11 slender setae of unequal lengths (4 on anterior margin and 7 on distal and posterior margins). Antenna ( +Fig. 120F +) 2-segmented; proximal segment 28×12 μm, unarmed; distal segment 25×13 μm, slightly shorter than first, bearing 4 setae (2 on inner margin and 2 on distal margin) and 1 lobe bearing minute spinules, and ornamented with short row of spinules proximally. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 120G +) with deeply concave posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 120G +) as small lobe tipped with 1 seta. Maxillule absent. Maxilla ( +Fig. 120H +) incompletely 2-segmented; broad proximal segment unarmed; narrow distal segment tipped with 1 naked seta and ornamented with 2 rows of minute spinules. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 120I +) robust, 2-segmented; proximal segment much wider than long, unarmed but ornamented with 2 transverse rows of minute spinules on anterior surface; distal segment bearing medial spine, but lacking mediodistal protrusion; terminal claw robust, strongly tapering, with trace of suture line at proximal third, 1 small seta in middle of anterior surface; apex of terminal claw simple, not bicuspid. + + + +FIG. 120. +eaplçstçmella crassa + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, ventral; C, genitoabdomen, dorsal; D, abdomen, ventral; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum and left mandible; H, maxilla; I, maxilliped; J, leg 1; K, leg 2; L, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C, D, 0.05 mm; E, G, H, J-L, 0.02 mm; F, I, 0.01 mm. + + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 120J +) consisting of protopod, exopod, and endopod. Protopod short, unarmed, but ornamented with rows of minute spinules on anterior surface. Exopod divisible into broader proximal part and abruptly narrower distal part; distal part distally bilobed, with pointed, spinule-like anterior lobe and rounded posterior lobe lacking seta. Endopod much broader than exopod, truncate, with rounded distal corners. Ventral surface of body lateral to legs 1-4 lacking any tubercles or protrusions. Leg 2 ( +Fig. 120K +) similar to leg 1; exopod same as that of leg 1, but endopod distally bilobed, with inner lobe more prominent than outer lobe. Legs 3 and 4 same as leg 2. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 120L +) as lobe bearing 3 unequal setae. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The caudal ramus in +eaplçstçmella +is typically armed with 5 setae. The recorded exceptions to this are: the presence of 4 setae in +e +. +tuberculata +, although this species has a rudimentary additional seta on the outer margin of the caudal ramus (as redescribed in the present work), +1 in +e +. +magellanẚca +, as described by +Chatton and Brément (1910) +, and none in +e +. +sycçzçae +(Salfi, 1926). In having 4 caudal setae, +e +. +crassa + +sp. nov. + +is similar only to +e +. +tuberculata +. These two species also share the possession of 3 setae on leg 5, a feature shared only with +e +. +dubẚa +and +e +. +bẚseta +sp. nov. +described below. However, +e +. +crassa + +sp. nov. + +is readily distinguishable from +e +. +tuberculata +by its 3-segmented abdomen (vs. abdomen unsegmented in +e +. +tuberculata +) and a 2-segmented antenna (vs. 3-segmented in +e +. +tuberculata +), and by the absence of the dorsolateral folds on the metasomal region (vs. the folds are present in +e +. +tuberculata +). + + +The small body size ( +0.96 mm +in length) of +e +. +crassa + +sp. nov +. + +is noteworthy because it is the smallest species known: the range of known body lengths in +eaplçstçmella +is from +1.01 mm +recorded in the present work for +e +. +bẚnçdçsa +sp. nov +. to +11.7 mm +recorded by Kim I.H. (2012) for +e +. +halçcynthẚae +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF5EFF4AFA93FC71D0481EBB.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF5EFF4AFA93FC71D0481EBB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8065b4fbd86 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF5EFF4AFA93FC71D0481EBB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,287 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostomella biseta + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 121 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21535), +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21536), and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17395) from + +Apl +ẚdẚum falklandẚcum + +Millar +, 1960; +E. Kerguelen Is. +, +MD04 +-BENTHOS cruise, +R +. +V +. “Marion Dufresne”, +Stn CP +13 ( +49°32-33’S +, +70°57’E +), depth + +149-155 m + +, +Boury-Esnault +coll., + +22 February 1975 + +. + + + +Additional material. + +3 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21537) from + +Apl +ẚdẚum cẚrcumvçlutum + +(Sluiter, 1900), +NW Kerguelen Is. +, +MD03 +-ICTHYO cruise, +RV +”Marion Dufresne”, +Stn +18-52-CP11, ( +47°42’S +, +68°07’E +), depth + +243 m + +, + +15 April 1974 + + +. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name refers to the presence of 2 setae on the mandible. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 121A, B +) eruciform, consisting of cephalosome, metasome, and genitoabdomen. Body length +1.74 mm +; maximum width +0.51 mm +. Cephalosome incompletely defined from metasome, 190×284 μm, distinctly narrower than metasome, and dorsoventrally depressed. Metasome cylindrical, comprising first to fifth pedigerous somites, unsegmented, without any trace of division, bearing 3 pairs of weak dorsolateral folds, at levels of legs 2-4, respectively ( +Fig. 121B +). Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 121C +) wider than long, consisting of genital somite and 2-segmented abdomen. Genital somite much wider than long; genital apertures large, positioned dorsolaterally; genital operculum bearing 3 teeth on medial margin. Abdomen clearly defined, much narrower than genital somite; first abdominal somite short; second abdominal somite incompletely articulated from first, as long as wide. Caudal rami widely divergent ( +Fig. 121C, D +), not articulated from somite, narrowing distally, about 1.8 times longer than wide (58×32 μm), armed with 3 distal setae and 1 subdistal, dorsal seta (at least twice as long as other setae). + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 121E +) 150 μm long, 2.4 times longer than wide, 2-segmented; articulation incomplete between segments; proximal segment bearing 11 small setae; distal segment distinctly shorter and narrower than proximal segment, bearing 9 small setae. Antenna ( +Fig. 121F +) 3-segmented; first segment longest, unarmed; second segment slightly longer than wide, with 1 seta at inner distal corner; third segment as long as second, bearing 2 unequal setae distally and 1 small, blunt seta and 1 lobe subdistally. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 121G +) simple, with concave posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 121H +) as rectangular lobe bearing 2 equal setae distally. Maxillule absent. Maxilla unsegmented ( +Fig. 121I +), but divisible into broad proximal part and narrower distal part, bearing 1 seta apically, and ornamented with 3 patches of minute spinules distally. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 121J +) 3-segmented; first segment broad, unarmed; second segment with prominent mediodistal projection bearing minute spinules distally and 1 spine on medial margin; third segment short and narrow, unarmed; terminal claw short and simple. + + + +FIG. 121. +eaplçstçmella bẚseta +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, genitoabdomen, ventral; D, left caudal ramus, dorsal; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum; H, mandible; I, maxilla; J, maxilliped; K, leg 1; L, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, 0.2 mm; C, 0.1 mm; D-L, 0.02 mm. + + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 121K +) with broad protopod bearing 1 seta on outer margin; exopod narrow, distally bilobed; anterior lobe claw-like, bearing pale, blunt lobe subdistally; posterior lobe tipped with 1 seta. Endopod wider than exopod, with mediodistal corner protruded. Legs 2-4 same as leg 1, but mediodistal corner of endopod of legs 2 and 3 more prominent than in legs 1 and 4. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 121L +) short, much broader than long, with 1 apical and 2 subapical setae; all setae equal in length. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The mandible of females of the genera +eaplçstçmẚdes +and +eaplçstçma +is typically armed with 1 to 3 distal setae. In contrast to these two genera, the mandible of female +eaplçstçmella +is variable in its armature, depending on species; it can be a spine, or a claw, or a seta. In five species of +eaplçstçmella +the distal element of the female mandible is a seta. These species are +e +. +dubẚa +, +e +. +magellanẚca +, +e +. +malacçcera +, +e +. +tuberculata +, and +e +. +crassa + +sp. nov. + +However, no species has hitherto been reported with a pair of setae on the mandible, as in +e +. +bẚseta +sp. nov. +Therefore, the new species can be differentiated from its congeners by the unique setation of its mandible alone. + + +The combination of three other features also serves of differentiate +e +. +bẚseta +sp. nov. +from its congeners. These are: (1) the caudal ramus is armed with 4 distinct setae (as in +e +. +tuberculata +), (2) the antennule is 2-segmented (as in +e +. +bẚlçbata +sp. nov. +and +eK crassa + +sp. nov. + +), and (3) leg 5 is tipped with 3 setae (as in +e +. +dubẚa +, +e +. +tuberculata +, and +e +. +crassa + +sp. nov. + +). No other species share all three of these diagnostic features. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF60FF70FA93FCECD51118B2.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF60FF70FA93FCECD51118B2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5c8ae5a4910 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF60FF70FA93FCECD51118B2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostomides similis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 87 +, +88 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1987), +5 ♀♀ +intact +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2018-1988), and +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17380) from +mçlyclẚnum macrçphyllum +Michaelsen, 1919; +New Caledonia +, +Stn NC +6, Mont Dore devant Îlet Bailly, depth 0 m, +Monniot +coll., + +20 August 1985 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species reflects its close similarity to +e +. +hawaẚẚensẚs +Ooishi, 1994 +. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 87A +) maggot-shaped, unsegmented, curved dorsally, gradually narrowing anteriorly. Body size variable; body length +3.53 mm +in largest specimen. Legs 1-4 separated by intervals of 620, 870, and 970 μm; leg 4 isolated from posterior border of body by 970 μm. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 87B +) very small, much wider than long, not demarcated from metasome. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 87C +) articulated from genitoabdomen, tapering, about 1.3 times longer than wide (29×22 μm), armed with 1 conical distal spine, 1 subdistal dorsal seta and 1 outer lateral seta. Egg sac ( +Fig. 87D +) containing 3-5 rows of eggs, 2.16× +0.43 mm +in measured sample; each egg about 170 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent, but rostral area sclerotized and ornamented with paired rows of 4 minute denticles ( +Fig. 87E +). Antennule ( +Fig. 87F +) indistinctly 4-segmented, with 3, 2, 2, and 8 setae on first to fourth segments, respectively; first segment much broader than distal segments; 2 setae on second segment larger than other setae. Antenna ( +Fig. 87G +) 3-segmented, consisting of broad coxa and basis and narrow endopod; coxa and basis unarmed; endopod shorter than basis, 2.5 times longer than wide (30×12 μm), gradually narrowing distally, armed with distal and sub- distal spines, both spines equal in size. + + +Labrum simple, unornamented, with convex posterior margin ( +Fig. 87E +). Mandible ( +Fig. 87H +) indistinctly 2- segmented; proximal segment tapering distally, unarmed; distal segment circular, much shorter than proximal segment, armed with 3 small setae distally. Maxillule ( +Fig. 87I +) 2-segmented; proximal segment (precoxa) projecting mediodistally, with 2 equal setae on subdistal medial margin; distal segment (palp) with 5 setae (3 on outer margin and 2 on distal margin). Maxilla ( +Fig. 85J +) lobate with 2 small setae (1 on medial margin and 1 apically). Maxilliped ( +Fig. 88A +) 4-segmented; first segment wider than long, unarmed; second segment with 1 seta at inner distal corner; short third segment unarmed; fourth segment also unarmed; terminal claw small, pointed distally. + + +Legs 1-4 identical in form and armature ( +Fig. 88B +). Protopod with outer seta. Exopod with 1 subdistal seta and 1 bifurcate distal spine; outer branch of distal spine much smaller than inner branch. Endopod rudimentary, represent- ed by small protuberance bearing 2 minute sensilla. Leg 5 ( +Fig. 88C +) represented by 2 small setae on ventrolateral surface near posterior end of metasomal region ( +Fig. 87B +). Leg 6 (Fig, 88D) probably represented by 2 spiniform elements in genital region accompanied by 5 dentiform elements. + + + +FIG. 87. +eaplçstçmẚdes sẚmẚlẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, right; B, genitoabdomen, dorsal; C, right caudal ramus, dorsal; D, egg sac; E, cephalic appendages +ẚn sẚtu +, ventral; F, antennule; G, antenna; H, mandible; I, maxillule; J, maxilla. Scale bars: A, D, 0.5 mm; B, 0.05 mm; C, E, G, J, 0.02 mm; F, H, I, 0.01 mm. + + + + +FIG. 88. +eaplçstçmẚdes sẚmẚlẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilliped; B, leg 1; C, leg 5; D, genital aperture. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +According to the keys to species of +ealçstçmẚdes +provided by +Ooishi (1994) +and by +Marchenkov & Boxshall (2003) +, +eK sẚmẚlẚs +sp. nov. +would be identified as +e +. +hawaẚẚensẚs +Ooishi, 1994 +, based on the shared possession of 2 spines on the antenna, 3 setae on the mandible, 7 setae on the maxillule, and 2 setae on the maxilla. However, there are several significant differences which confirm the distinct status of +eK sẚmẚlẚs +sp. nov. +, as follows: (1) the maxillule of +e +. +hawaẚẚensẚs +bears 3 setae on the proximal segment and 4 setae on the distal segment, whereas the maxillule of +e +. +sẚmẚlẚs +sp. nov. +bears 2 setae on the proximal segment and 5 setae on the distal segment; (2) the exopods of legs 1-4 of +e +. +sẚmẚlẚs +sp. nov. +each bear 2 spines which are fused together at the base thus appearing as a single bifurcate spine, but in +e +. +hawaẚẚensẚs +, the 2 spines are separate; (3) leg 5 of +e +. +sẚmẚlẚs +sp. nov. +is represented by 2 setae, but it consists of 3 setae in +e +. +hawaẚẚensẚs +; and (4) the antennule is 4-segmented in +e +. +sẚmẚlẚs +sp. nov. +, although the segmentation is incomplete, but unsegmented in +e +. +hawaẚẚensẚs +. + + +eaplçstçmẚdes hawaẚẚensẚs +was originally described as an associate of +mçlyclẚnum cçnstellatum +Savigny, 1816 at Hawaii ( +Ooishi, 1994 +) and it was subsequently reported from the same host, an invasive species in the Gulf of California ( +Tovar et al., 2010 +). The new species is associated with +mçlyclẚnum macrçphyllum +collected in +New Caledonia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF62FF7EFA93F996D7E8190F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF62FF7EFA93F996D7E8190F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9fde1f78ba9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF62FF7EFA93F996D7E8190F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostomides bermudensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 89 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1989), +4 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2018-1990), and +2 ♀♀ +para- types (dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17381) from +mçlyclẚnum cçnstellatum +Savigny, 1816 (MNHN-IT-2008-6981 = +MNHN +A1 +/ +POL +.B/3); +St David’s I. +, +Bermuda +, 1970. + + + + + +Etymology. +The new species is named after its +type +locality. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 89A +) similar to +e +. +sẚmẚlẚs +sp. nov. +in form, unsegmented, curved dorsally, and narrowing anteriorly. Body length +4.20 mm +; maximum width +0.97 mm +in posterior quarter. Intervals between first to fourth legs 0.76, 0.98, and +1.21 mm +, respectively. Genitoabdomen short, not defined from metasome. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 89B +) slightly wider than long (25×29 μm), indistinctly defined from genitoabdomen, armed with 1 distal spine and 2 setae (1 at proximal third of outer margin and 1 dorsal, subdistally); distal spine longer than wide (11×8 μm). Egg sac ( +Fig. 89D +) 3.26× +0.29 mm +, containing 3 or 4 rows of eggs; each egg about 170 μm in diameter. + + + +FIG. 89. +eaplçstçmẚdes bermudensẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, right; B, caudal rami, dorsal; C, cephalic appendages, right; D, egg sac; E, rostrum; F, antennule; G, antenna; H, labrum; I, mandible; J, maxillule; K, maxilla; L, maxilliped; M, leg 1; N, leg 2; O, leg 3. Scale bars: A, D, 0.5 mm; B, E-O, 0.02 mm; C, 0.05 mm. + + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 89C, E +) small, much wider than long, ornamented with minute spinules subdistally and 4 minute sensilla proximally. Antennule ( +Fig. 89F +) 4-segmented; armature formula 3, 1, 2, and 10+2 aesthetascs; terminal segment subdivided by partial suture in middle of posterior side into parts bearing 4+aesthetasc and 6+aesthetasc. Antenna ( +Fig. 89G +) 2-segmented; proximal segment (coxobasis) unarmed; distal segment (endopod) with 2 larger distal and 2 very small subdistal spines; all spines articulated at base. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 89H +) weak, flexible, unornamented, with broadly convex posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 89I +) digitiform, tapering distally, with slight constriction distally and 2 small setae subapically. Maxillule ( +Fig. 89J +) incompletely 2-segmented; proximal segment (precoxa) with 3 setae (distalmost rudimentary); distal segment (palp) roughly quadrate, with 5 setae (4 outer and 1 distal), distal seta shorter than other 4. Maxilla ( +Fig. 89K +) as broad lobe bearing 1 apical and 1 subapical seta. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 89L +) 4-segmented; first segment broad, unarmed; second segment with 2 small setae; third and fourth segments small, unarmed; terminal claw small, conical, half as long as fourth segment. + + +Legs 1-4 biramous, consisting of protopod, exopod, and small endopod ( +Fig. 89 +M-O). Both rami not articulated from protopod; protopods with outer seta. Exopods of legs 1, 3, and 4 each armed with 1 seta and 2 spines ( +Fig. 89M, O +). Exopod of leg 2 ( +Fig. 89N +) armed with 1 seta and 3 spines. Endopod rather distinct, bearing 1 or 2 sensilla. Endopods of legs 3 and 4 shorter but broader than in legs 1 and 2. + +Leg 5 represented by 2 minute setae. Leg 6 represented by 1 spine and 1 spiniform process in genital area, accompanied by 5 internal, tooth-like elements. + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +In the genus +eaplçstçmẚdes +the number of armature elements on the exopod of leg 1 is more than or the same as that of leg 2. The exopods of legs 1-4 of +eaplçstçmẚdes bermudensẚs +sp. nov. +are armed with 3, 4, 3, and 3 armature elements, respectively, which is an unusual combination of armature elements that serves to characterize the new species. The maxillule of +e +. +bermudensẚs +sp. nov. +is armed with 3 setae on the proximal segment and 5 setae on the distal segment. This maxillulary setation is shared only with +e +. +brementẚ +Chatton & Harant, 1924, but further comparison between +e +. +brementẚ +and the new species is unnecessary because of the different armature patterns in legs 1-4 of +e +. +brementẚ +(5, 4, 3, and 3 according to +Ooishi (2008a)) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF66FF74FA93FF10D1471ACB.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF66FF74FA93FF10D1471ACB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0871d2c82c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF66FF74FA93FF10D1471ACB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostomides scotti +Chatton & Harant, 1924 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 85 +, +86 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +4 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1986, +2 ♀♀ +dissected) from +mçlyclẚnum aurantẚum +Milne Edwards, 1841; Saint-Vaast-la-Hougue, Atlantic coast of +France +, +Monniot +coll. + + + +Supplementary redescription of female. +Body ( +Fig. 85A +) maggot-shaped, narrowing anteriorly, consisting of cephalosome, incompletely 5-segmented metasome and 2-segmented genitoabdomen. Body length +1.48 mm +; maximum width +0.46 mm +(across middle). Anterior half of metasome narrowing anteriorly; cephalosome 150×235 μm, much narrower than first pedigerous somite. Pedigerous somites defined by constrictions. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 85B +) distinctly bipartite with parts defined by deep constriction; anterior part strongly tapering posteriorly, subdivided by trace of transverse suture line; posterior part (anal somite) narrowing anteriorly. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 85C +) conical, not articulated from anal somite, as long as wide, armed with 1 triangular spine distally plus 4 setae (2 outer, 1 dorsal, and 1 inner subdistal); distal spine broader than long. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 85D +) wider than long (19×32 μm), nearly triangular, with blunt apex, ornamented with 5 or 6 denticles subdistally on lateral margins. Antennule ( +Fig. 85E +) unsegmented, but with traces of 2 articulations, distinctly tapering, with large protuberance on proximal ventral margin, and armed with 13 small setae (arranged as 3, 3, and 7). Antenna ( +Fig. 85F +) 3-segmented, consisting of coxa, basis, and endopod; coxa and basis unarmed; endopod slightly longer than basis, bearing 4 spines (2 proximal spines smaller, not articulated at base, dentiform). + + +Labrum small, unornamented, with convex posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 85G +) incompletely 2-segmented, digitiform, with 3 blunt setae on distal segment. Maxillule ( +Fig. 85H +) 2-segmented; proximal segment (precoxa) with 4 blunt setae on mediodistal surface, distalmost seta broad, leaf-like; distal segment (palp) originating on outer margin of proximal segment, broadening distally, bearing 5 bluntly tipped setae of unequal lengths, innermost shortest. Maxilla ( +Fig. 85I +) lobate, tapering distally, with 2 setae (1 lateral and 1 distal). Maxilliped ( +Fig. 85J +) consisting of 4 segments plus terminal claw; first segment (syncoxa) much wider than long, unarmed; second segment (basis) with 1 distal and 1 subdistal setae; third segment unarmed; fourth segment with pointed inner distal corner; terminal claw stout, shorter than fourth segment. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 86A +) consisting of protopod, exopod, and endopod. Protopod unarmed, with transverse sclerotized band. Exopod armed with 1 seta on outer margin, 2 small spines on subdistal outer margin, and 1 bifurcate spine distally. Endopod prominent, not articulated from protopod, unarmed and unornamented, as long as wide, with rounded distal margin. Leg 2 ( +Fig. 86B +) broader than leg 1. Exopod armed with 1 seta, 1 small spine on subdistal outer margin and bifurcate distal spine. Endopod narrower than that of leg 1. Legs 3 and 4 same as leg +2 in +form and armature. Leg 5 ( +Fig. 85K +) consisting of 3 small equal setae on lateral margin of fifth pedigerous somite (2 located on small lobe). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 85L +) represented by 1 spine and 1 larger, spiniform process on genital operculum; 5 tooth-like elements present on surface medial to leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Ooishi (2002a) +described the male of this species. + + + + +Remarks. +eaplçstçmẚdes scçttẚ +, the +type +species of the genus and first described by +Chatton & Harant (1924b) +, was redescribed by +Ooishi (2002a) +on the basis of specimens taken from the +mçlyclẚnum aurantẚum +Milne Edwards, 1841. There are some minor discrepancies between our specimens and Ooishi’s redescription. Firstly, +Ooishi (2002a) +did not figure or mention the presence of denticles on the lateral margins of the rostrum, which are quite distinct in our specimens. Secondly, the setae on the maxillule of our specimens are blunt and the distalmost seta on its proximal segment (precoxa) is broad, leaf-like, but in Ooishi’s specimens the setae are generally attenuated and the distalmost seta on the first segment is vestigial. Thirdly, we observed 1 spine and 4 setae on the caudal ramus in our specimens whereas Ooishi described and figured 1 spine and 2 setae on the ramus. Because of the numerous similarities between the two sets of material, we consider that these discrepancies are likely to be due either to the state of the material observed or to variation. The similarities between Ooishi’s specimens and ours include: (1) the shape of the genitoabdomen is consistent, i.e., the anterior and posterior parts are clearly demarcated by a deep constriction; (2) they both have a large proximal protuberance on the ventral margin of the antennule; and (3) the distalmost seta on the distal segment (palp) of the maxillule is much smaller than the proximal setae. In addition, both sets of material were found in the same host species, +mçlyclẚnum aurantẚum +, in the Northeast Atlantic. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF69FF7BFA93FF10D6CA1A77.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF69FF7BFA93FF10D6CA1A77.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e93d1862421 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF69FF7BFA93FF10D6CA1A77.xml @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma rectangulatum + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 91 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2009-5230) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17382) from +mçlysyncratçn +sp.; off +Libanona +, +Sud +Madagascar +, +ATIMO VATAE +Expedition, +Stn TR +01 ( +25°00.25´S +, +46°59.4´E +), depth + +9 m + +, +MNHN +coll., + +28 April 2010 + +. + + + +Additional material. + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2009-5232) in +mçlysyncratçn +sp., +Port Dauphin +, +Madagascar +, +ATIMO VATAE +expedition, +Stn TR +03 ( +25°0.08´S +, +47°0.01´E +), depth + +21 m + +, + +29 April 2010 + + +. + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species refers to its rectangular abdomen. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 91A, B +) eruciform, cylindrical, slightly curved dorsally, consisting cephalosome, indistinctly 5-segmented metasome, and small 2-segmented genitoabdomen. Body length 940 μm; maximum width 290 μm across fourth pedigerous somite. Cephalosome 175×210 μm, narrower than first pedigerous somite; second to fourth pedigerous somites nearly equal in width, each wider than first. Fourth and fifth pedigerous somites demarcated from each other by dorsal and ventral constrictions. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 91C +) small, 105×120 μm, occupying only 11% of body length, consisting of triangular anterior somite bearing genital apertures dorsally, and narrow, rectangular free abdomen (posterior somite); free abdomen clearly defined from anterior somite due to abrupt narrowing, longer than wide (39×27 μm). Caudal rami absent, but 1 caudal seta may be present on postero- lateral corner of free abdomen ( +Fig. 91D +). + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 91E +) as small, unsegmented lobe, 24×17 μm, bearing patch of small spinules (or setae?) on apex. Antenna ( +Fig. 91F +) stout, 3-segmented; first segment broad but very short and unarmed; second segment longest, unarmed; terminal segment slightly longer than wide, armed with 4 bifurcate spines; spines becoming gradually larger from proximal to distal. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 91G +) simple, unornamented, with broad distal lobe. Mandible ( +Fig. 91G +) vestigial, represented by pair of weak unarmed tubercles, located lateral to labrum. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 91H +) stout, very small, 4-segmented; all segments wider than long; proximal 3 segments unarmed; distal segment bearing unequally bifurcate terminal claw. + + +Legs 1-4 consisting of protopod and exopod; endopod not discernible; exopods armed only with spines (lacking seta), incompletely articulated from protopod. Exopod of leg 1 ( +Fig. 91I +) armed with 5 bifurcate spines and ornamented with spinules near base of each spine. Leg 4 ( +Fig. 91J +) slightly larger than leg 1, armed with 4 bifurcate spines and ornamented as in leg 1. Legs 2 and 3 same as leg +4 in +shape and armature. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 91K +) as conical fleshy process on fifth pedigerous somite, directed posterodorsally, bearing 2 small setae (1 dorsal and 1 distal). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 91L +) represented by 1 small spine and 1 spiniform process on genital operculum. Four dentiform elements present near leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Ooishi (2009b) +recognized seven species of +eaplçstçma +as “subgroup 2”. In one member of this group, +e +. +bẚspẚnçsum +Ooishi, 2009, the exopods of legs 1-4 are armed with 5, 4, 5, and 5 spines (5-4-5-5 pattern), respectively. The other six species of this group all display a 5-4-4-4 pattern for legs 1-4, in common with +e +. +rectangulatum + +sp. nov. + +However, only one of these six species, +e +. +dudleyae +Ooishi, 1998 +, is comparable with the new species in having a single caudal seta and a vestigial mandible lacking any setal elements. +Ooishi (1998) +described +eK dudleyae +on the basis of material from +Florida +, +USA +and it has a leg 5 represented only by a pair of setae. In contrast, leg 5 of +e +. +rectangulatum + +sp. nov. + +is well-developed, being represented by a distinct fleshy process bearing 2 setae. +eaplçstçma dudleyae +also has caudal rami, although they are small and lobate, while +e +. +rectangulatum + +sp. nov. + +lacks defined caudal rami. The latter feature of the new species is unique within the genus. Collectively these differences justify the establishment of the new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF6BFF79FA93FF10D00A1BCC.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF6BFF79FA93FF10D00A1BCC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..faa8c124b6a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF6BFF79FA93FF10D00A1BCC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,209 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma manadoense + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 92 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1992), +3 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2018-1993), and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17383) from +budẚstçma +sp.; Point called +TG Torowitan +, North tip of +Sulawesi +, +Indonesia +, +OCDN 1431 +-P, Site MANADO 25 ( +01°45.10’N +, +124°58.87’E +), depth + +5 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +21 May 1993 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the +type +locality, Manado, is taken for the name of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 92A +) eruciform, relatively slender, slightly curved dorsally, consisting of cephalosome, 4-segmented metasome, and 3-segmented genitoabdomen. Body length +1.69 mm +; maximum width 350 μm across fourth pedigerous somite; maximum dorsoventral depth 380 μm at fourth pedigerous somite. Cepha- losome narrower than metasome, defined from metasome by indistinct articulation. Metasome gradually broadening posteriorly; somites defined from one another by constrictions. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 92B, C +) as long as wide (215×220 μm), tapering, consisting of genital and 2 abdominal somites. Genital somite bearing transverse stripe dorsally; genital apertures positioned dorsolaterally. Second abdominal somite distinctly narrower than first. Left and right caudal rami completely fused with each other ( +Fig. 92D +), each bearing 1 conical spine on distal margin and 1 seta on lateral margin. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 92E +) longer than wide, distinctly 2-segmented, armed with 1 seta distally on proximal segment, and cluster of about 12 setae around apex of segment; all setae short and bluntly tipped. Antenna ( +Fig. 92G +) 2-segmented; proximal segment swollen, unarmed; distal segment about 1.5 times longer than wide, armed with 4 spines, proximal spine minute and simple, 3 distal spines larger and bifurcate. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 92G +) simple, unornamented with sclerotized posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 92G +) as weak lobe positioned lateral to labrum, each tipped with 1 small, nipple-shaped element. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 92H +) small, stout, 4-segmented; proximal 3 segments unarmed, each wider than long; terminal segment bearing unequally bifurcate claw. + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of protopod and exopod; endopod not discernible. Exopods with short inner margin and much longer outer margin, armed only with spines (lacking seta). Two terminal spines on each exopod fused at base (arising from common base). Leg 1 ( +Fig. 92I +) exopod armed with 5 spines and ornamented with many spinules on anterior surface. Legs 2 ( +Fig. 92J +), 3 and 4 shaped and ornamented as leg 1, but armed with 4 spines (with 2 terminal spines fused at base). + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 92C +) as short, blunt posterolateral tubercle on compound last metasomite bearing 1 or 2 small setae. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 92K +) represented by 1 small spine and 1 spiniform process; 4 dentiform elements on surface adjacent to leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +While describing +eaplçstçma junctum +Ooishi, 2009 as an associate of +budẚstçma +sp. in +Madagascar +, +Ooishi (2009b) +mentioned that this copepod was the only species of +eaplçstçma +to have medially fused caudal rami. +eaplçstçma manadçense +sp. nov. +is the second species characterised by the possession of medially fused caudal rami and is, therefore, compared in detail with +e +. +junctum +. The new species differs from +e +. +junctum +as follows: (1) the fused caudal rami are clearly articulated from the anal somite (cf. indistinctly articulated in +e +. +junctum +); (2) the caudal rami are armed with 1 spine and 1 seta (cf. armed only with 1 spine in +e +. +junctum +); (3) the first segment of the antennule is not expanded (cf. markedly expanded in +e +. +junctum +); (4) the two terminal spines on the exopods of legs 1-4 are fused at base (cf. these spines separate from each other in +e +. +junctum +); and (5) and the mandible is tipped with a rudimentary setal element (cf. tipped with 2 setae in +e +. +junctum +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF6CFF7CFA93FB49D6721AAF.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF6CFF7CFA93FB49D6721AAF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d4c7d172df9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF6CFF7CFA93FB49D6721AAF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostomides partitus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 90 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1991, dissected and mounted on a slide) from + +Apl +ẚdẚum benhamẚ + +(Brewin, 1946) (MNHN-IT-2018-19 = +MNHN +A1 +/ +APL +.B/547); +Madagascar +, +Îlot des Roches +, +ATIMO VATAE +expedition, +Stn +TA56 +( +24°58´S +, +47°03´E +), depth + +1-8 m + +, +MNHN +coll., + +14 June 2010 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +partẚt +(=divided), referring to the segmented body of the female of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 90A +) maggot-shaped, well-segmented, consisting of cephalosome, 4-segmented metasome, and 4-segmented genitoabdomen. Body length +1.15 mm +; maximum width +0.37 mm +across second pedigerous somite. Body somites clearly defined from one another by deep constrictions and distinct suture lines. Genitoabdomen indistinctly articulated from metasome, consisting of genital somite and 3-segmented abdomen. Genital apertures positioned dorsally. Abdomen strongly tapering. Caudal rami ( +Fig. 90B +) convergent, originating on dorsal surface of anal somite, not articulated from somite; each ramus ( +Fig. 90C +) tapering, longer than wide, divided into larger proximal part bearing 1 seta distally and lobate distal part bearing 1 small, claw-like distal spine. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 90D +) 3-segmented; first segment expanded, about twice as long as distal part of antennule, armed with 4 small setae; second segment incompletely articulated from first, armed with 1 small and 1 large, extremely expanded seta; third segment armed with 10 setae (3 proximal and 7 distal and subdistal). Antenna ( +Fig. 90E +) 2-segmented, consisting of coxobasis and endopod; coxobasis unarmed; endopod about 3.1 times longer than wide (50×16 μm), longer than coxobasis, armed with 4 claw-like spines, all articulated at base, and ornamented with many minute spinules along outer surface. + + + +FIG. 90. +eaplçstçmẚdes partẚtus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, distal part of genitoabdomen, ventral; C, left caudal ramus, ventral; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, labrum; G, mandible; H, maxillule; I, maxilla; J, maxilliped; K, leg 1; L, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, 0.1 mm; B, K, 0.02 mm; C-J, L, 0.01 mm. + + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 90F +) pale, much wider than long, strongly tapering towards truncate apex. Mandible ( +Fig. 90G +) lobate, with convex medial margin; armed with 2 broad setae distally. Maxillule ( +Fig. 90H +) unsegmented, lobate, armed with 5 broad setae (2 posterodistal, 2 anterodistal, and 1 subdistal). Maxilla ( +Fig. 90I +) also unsegmented and lobate, armed with 9 setae (6 slender and 1 broad setae distally and 2 expanded setae on posterior margin). Maxilliped ( +Fig. 90J +) 4-segmented; first segment much larger than other segments, as long as wide, unarmed; second segment with 2 small, transparent setae (1 mediodistal and 1 outer distal), third and fourth segments small, unarmed, with similar lengths; terminal claw small, with strongly curved, acute tip. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 90K +) biramous, but both rami not articulated from protopod; protopod unarmed, lacking outer seta; exopod with 1 swollen, transparent seta in middle of outer margin and 2 distal spines of unequal lengths, ornamented with several minute spinules near bases of distal spines; endopod short, broad, appearing as convex inner protuberance on protopod. Legs 2-4 exactly same as leg +1 in +form and armature. + + +Leg 5 as unarmed posterolateral lobe on compound fourth metasomite ( +Fig. 90A +). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 90L +) represented by 1 spine and 1 large, blunt process covered with transparent material. Five dentiform internal elements present near leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +eaplçstçmẚdes partẚtus +sp. nov. +can be differentiated from its congeners by three diagnostic features, as follows: (1) the maxillule is unsegmented (in all previously known species of the genus the maxillule is 2-segmented, consisting of the proximal precoxa and the distal palp); (2) the maxilla is armed with 9 setae, compared to a maximum of 4 setae in all congeners (as for example in +e +. +luteçlus +Ooishi & Illg, 1977); and (3) the outer seta on the exopod of legs 1-4 is markedly swollen and distinctly broader than the distal spines (another unique feature of the new species). + + + +Genus + +Haplostoma +Canu, 1886 + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Female: Body eruciform, unsegmented or indistinctly segmented.Genitoabdomen fused with or obscurely defined from metasome.Caudal rami armed with1 to6 armature elements(spines plus setae), or occasionally unarmed. Rostrum not developed.Antennule small, 1- to 5-segmented.Antenna 2- or 3-segmented; terminal segment bearing 3 to 5 armature elements (usually 4 spines). Labrum simple or with 2 or 3 pairs of lobes on posterior margin. Mandible absent or small, mostly 1-or 2-segmented, tipped with 1 to3 setae.Maxillule and maxilla absent.Maxilliped consisting of 4 segments plus terminal claw.Legs 1-4 usually consisting of protopod,exopod and endopod.Protopods unsegment- ed, with or without outer seta. Exopods with up to 5 armature elements; in some species distal spines fused at base to form bifurcate spine; exopod occasionally with single, claw-like distal element. Endopods represented by inner distal protuberance on protopod, sometimes absent. Leg 5 variously reduced, usually lobate and bearing 1 to 3 small setae. +Male +: Body cyclopiform with distinct prosome-urosome division. Prosome consisting of cephalosome and first to fourth pedigerous somites. Urosome 6-segmented. Caudal rami armed with 5 setae. Rostrum not developed. Antennule 4-segmented; first segment bearing numerous aesthetascs.Antenna 3-segmented with 3 or 4 armature elements on terminal segment. Labrum simple. Mandible 1- to 3-segmented, with 1 to 3 setae distally. Maxillule absent. Maxilla as a lobe, unarmed or armed with 1 apical seta. Maxilliped consisting of 4 segments plus terminal claw. Leg 1 with 3-segmented exopod; endopod 1- or 2-segmented, with transformed setal elements. Legs 2 and 3 with 3-segmented rami. Leg 4 with 3-segmented exopod and 2-segmented endopod. First exopodal segment of legs 1-4 lacking inner seta. Leg 5 consisting of 1 lateral seta on fifth pedigerous somite and exopodal segment tipped with 2 setae, Leg 6 represented by 2 setae on genital operculum. + + + + + +Type +species. + +eaplçstçma brevẚcauda +(Canu, 1886) by original monotypy. + + + + +Remarks. +Ooishi (2009b) +recognized 18 species of +eaplçstçma +as valid. In seven of these species, which she recognized as “subgroup 2”, the exopods of legs 1-4 are armed only with spines and lack setae (the proximal seta is transformed to a spine). In the present work 12 new species are described, including three belonging to Ooishi’s subgroup 2 and nine placed in subgroup 1. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF71FF61FA93FDC1D10D1C33.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF71FF61FA93FDC1D10D1C33.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..27f8e145af3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF71FF61FA93FDC1D10D1C33.xml @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma vanuatuense + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 96 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1996, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +ohçpalaea desme +Monniot F. +, 2003 (Type MNHN-IT-2008-7888 = +MNHN +P1 +/ +RHO +.A/32); +S. Anatom Is. +, +Vanuatu +, MUSORSTOM 8 cruise, +RV +“Alis”, +Stn CP +961 ( +20°18´S +, +169°50´E +), depth + +100-110 m + +, +Bouchet +& +Richer +de Forges-IRD coll., + +21 September 1994 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The +type +locality, +Vanuatu +, provides the name of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 96A, B +) eruciform, narrow, slightly curved dorsally: body length +2.43 mm +, maximum width 540 μm and maximum dorsoventral depth of 570 μm both at level of second pedigerous somite. Cephalosome and 4 metasomites defined by lateral constrictions; fourth metasomite compound, consisting of fused fourth and fifth pedigerous somites. Genitoabdomen slightly longer than wide (277×270 μm), distinctly 3-segment- ed, consisting of genital somite and 2-segmented abdomen. Genital somite comprising broad anterior and narrower posterior parts; genital apertures positioned dorsally. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 96C +) tapering, slightly wider than long (38×40 μm); armed with 1 claw-like distal spine, 1 subdistal seta, and 1 outer seta. Egg sac longer than body, coiled, containing about 5 rows of eggs; each egg about 200 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent, but rostral area sclerotized ( +Fig. 96D +). Antennule ( +Fig. 96E +) incompletely 2-segmented, armed with 1 seta on proximal segment and 18 setae on distal segment; all setae short and bluntly tipped, except 5 longer, attenuated setae in distal region. Antenna ( +Fig. 96F +) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment narrower and shorter than proximal segment, 2.6 times longer than wide; armed with 4 simple spines, all articulated at base. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 96D +) well-developed, with 6 equal lobes along posterior margin, all of these lobes longer than wide and each with rounded apex. Mandible ( +Fig. 96D +) twice as long as wide (33×16 μm), tapering, with 2 equal setae on apex. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 96G +) robust, 4-segmented; broad first segment unarmed; second segment bearing broad, short setae; small third and fourth segments unarmed; terminal claw small, bifurcate. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 96H +) consisting of protopod, exopod and endopod; protopod bearing 1 seta on outer margin; exopod incompletely defined from protopod, armed with 1 seta and 4 simple spines; endopod triangular, not articulated from protopod, shorter than exopod. Leg 2 ( +Fig. 96I +) with 1 seta and 3 spines on exopod; endopod much larger than that of leg 1, as long as exopod, with small nipple-shaped tubercle on apex. Legs 3 and 4 similar to leg +2 in +armature and shape, but lacking distal tubercle on endopod. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 96J +) small but distinct, digitiform, longer than wide (110×67 μm), not articulated at base; rounded distal margin armed with 4 thin setae (1 dorsal and 3 distal). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 96K +) represented by 2 small spines, 1 larger spiniform process, and 7 denticles on genital operculum; 6 other internal denticles visible near leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +eaplçstçma vanuatuense + +sp. nov. + +possesses 6 distinct, equal lobes on the posterior margin of the labrum and has a combination of 5, 4, 4, and 4 armature elements on the exopods of legs 1-4. Among previously known species only +e +. +kẚmẚ +Seo & Lee, 2001 +recorded from the Sea of +Japan +( +Seo & Lee, 2001 +) shares both of these features. +eaplçstçma kẚmẚ +is distinguishable from +e +. +vanuatuense + +sp. nov. + +by three main features: (1) the genitoabdomen is not segmented (cf. 3-segmented in +e +. +vanuatuense + +sp. nov. + +); (2) the outer margins of legs 3 and 4 each bear a large protrusion near the base of the proximal seta (cf. such a protrusion is absent in +e +. +vanuatuense + +sp. nov. + +); and (3) leg 5 is strongly tapering, with 1 proximal and 2 distal setae (cf. digitiform, with 1 proximal and 3 distal setae in +e +. +vanuatuense + +sp. nov. + +). These differences are sufficient to justify the establishment of the new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF73FF60FA93FE15D6B11D8B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF73FF60FA93FE15D6B11D8B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6a06b1b2cee --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF73FF60FA93FE15D6B11D8B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma laticaudatum + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs 97 +, +98 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1997), +1 ♀ +paratype +(MNHN-IU-2018-1998), and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dis- sected MNHN-IU-2014-17384) from +mseudçdẚstçma cyrnusense +Pérès +, 1952; +Tunisia +, no other collection data. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +lat +(=broad) and +cauda +(=the tail), alluding to the broad caudal rami of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 97A, B +) eruciform, slightly curved dorsally; body length +1.60 mm +, maximum width 424 μm at region of leg 2. Cephalosome ( +Fig. 97C, D +) not defined from first pedigerous somite ( +Fig. 97A +), narrowing anteriorly. Metasomites defined only by constrictions; last metasomite consisting of fused fourth and fifth pedigerous somites. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 97E +) consisting of genital somite and 2-segmented abdomen. Genital somite wider than long (118×200 μm), consisting of broader anterior and narrower posterior parts, with dorsal strip connecting paired genital apertures. First and second abdominal somites 27×109 and 55×90 μm, respec- tively. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 97F +) triangular, slightly wider than long (36×38 μm); armed with 1 seta on outer margin and 1 unequally bifurcate spine on apex. Egg sac longer than body, containing 2-4 rows of eggs; each egg about 140 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum not developed, represented by produced frontal apex of cephalosome ( +Fig. 97C +). Antennule ( +Fig. 97G +) tapering, unsegmented, but with 3 or 4 partial suture lines along posterior side, armed with 16 small setae, fourth proximal seta with swollen base. Antenna ( +Fig. 97H +) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment as long as proximal, armed with 4 large, conical spines. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 97I +) with 6 large, blunt lobes along posterior margin, 2 lateral lobes on each side fused proximally (appearing as 2 bifurcate lobes and 2 simple lobes). Mandible ( +Fig. 97I +) longer than wide, tipped with 1 or 2 small setae. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 98A +) tapering distally, 4-segmented; first segment unarmed; second segment incompletely articulated from first, slightly wider than long, armed with 2 small setae; third segment unarmed; fourth segment with small denticle at inner distal corner; terminal claw as long as fourth segment, with 1 small denticle proximally on inner margin. + + +Legs 1-4 consisting of protopod, exopod and endopod; protopods unarmed; exopods incompletely demarcated from protopod; endopods represented by broad protuberance. Exopod of leg 1 ( +Fig. 98B +) armed with 1 seta and 4 simple spines. Exopod of leg 2 ( +Fig. 98C +) armed with 1 seta and 3 simple spines. Legs 3 and 4 armed as leg 2. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 98D +) as conical tubercle, wider than long, bearing 1 proximal and 2 distal setae. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 98E +) represented by 1 spinule and 3 spiniform processes on genital operculum; 9 small internal denticles present near leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Five species of +eaplçstçma +are now known to have 6 large lobes along the posterior margin of the labrum, as in +e +. +latẚcaudatum +sp. nov. +They are +e +. +banyulensẚs +, +e +. +kẚmẚ +, +e +. +eruca +, +e +. +pẚngue +sp. nov. +, and +e +. +vanuatuense + +sp. nov. + +Of these species, only in +e +. +eruca +are the 2 lateral lobes on each side of the labrum fused at base ( +Ooishi & O’Reilly, 2004 +) as in +e +. +latẚcaudatum +sp. nov. +eaplçstçma latẚcaudatum +sp. nov. +differs from +e +. +eruca +in having 1 spine plus 1 seta on the caudal ramus (vs. 2 spines and 1 seta in +e +. +eruca +), 3 spines plus 1 seta on the exopod of legs 3 and 4 (vs. 2 spines plus 1 seta in +e +. +eruca +), and a small leg 5 (vs. large leg 5, about 1.2 times longer than wide in +e +. +eruca +according to +Ooishi & O’Reilly, 2004 +). + + +In +e +. +latẚcaudatum +sp. nov. +the exopod of leg 1 is armed with 4 spines plus 1 seta and the exopods of legs 2-4 are each armed with 3 spines plus 1 seta. This combination of armature is shared with +e +. +brevẚcauda +(Canu, 1886), +e +. +kẚmẚ +, +e +. +setẚferum +Ooishi & Illg, 1977, and +e +. +vanuatuense + +sp. nov. +, + +but, +e +. +latẚcaudatum +sp. nov. +can be distinguished from these congeners by the different form of the labrum as mentioned above and by the differing armature of caudal ramus, which bears 2 armature elements (1 spine plus 1 seta) in contrast to 3 or more armature elements in these other four congeneric species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF75FF63FA93FA04D5C31C87.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF75FF63FA93FA04D5C31C87.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..21104dd11eb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF75FF63FA93FA04D5C31C87.xml @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma pingue + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 94 +, +95 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1995, dissected and mounted on a slide) from + +Tr +ẚdẚdemnum + +sp.; SW +Cape +, +Republic of South Africa +, depth 0 m (intertidal), + +05 February 1996 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from the Latin +pẚngu +meaning “fatty”, referring to the stout body. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 94A +) eruciform, slightly curved dorsally, consisting of fleshy anterior part and small genitoabdomen. Body length +2.08 mm +; maximum width of body 790 μm across last metasomite. Anterior part of body strongly tapering anteriorly, divisible by constrictions into 5 somites comprising cephalosome and 4 metasomites; last metasomite compound, representing fused fourth and fifth pedigerous somites. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 94B +) small, 215×277 μm, occupying about 10% of body length, 2-segmented; anterior somite containing geni- tal apparatus, strongly tapering posteriorly with transverse strip of sclerotization on dorsal surface ( +Fig. 94C +); posterior somite (free abdomen) ( +Fig. 94C +) clearly defined from anterior somite, wider than long. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 94C, D +) tapering, directed posteroventrally, 1.54 times longer than wide (40×26 μm); armed with 2 distal spines and 1 dorsal plus 2 lateral setae; proximal lateral seta small, spinule-like. Egg sac ( +Fig. 94E +) stringy, 6.28×0.2 μm, much longer than body, containing 4 or 5 rows of eggs. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 94F +) as small, sclerotized protuberance.Antennule ( +Fig. 94G +) indistinctly 2-segmented; proximal segment swollen, subdivided by anterior partial suture line, with 4 broad setae (distal seta inserted on lobe); distal segment obscurely articulated from proximal segment, much smaller; armed with 11 setae and 1 aesthetasc.Antenna ( +Fig. 94H +) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment 1.4 times longer than proximal, armed with 4 simple spines along distal half of segment. + + + +FIG. 9 +3. +eaplçstçma gracẚle +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, ventral; B, anterior part of body, ventral; D, distal part of body, dorsal; D, antennule and antenna, ventral; E, F, maxillipeds; G, leg 1, ventral; H, leg 2, ventral; I, leg 3, ventral. Scale bars: A, 0.2 mm; B, C, 0.05 mm; D-F, 0.01 mm; G-I, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 94. +eaplçstçma pẚngue +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, right; B, posterior end of body, dorsal; C, abdomen, dorsal; D, caudal ramus, lateral; E, egg sac; F, cephalic appendages +ẚn sẚtu +, ventral; G, antennule; H, antenna. Scale bars: A, E, 0.5 mm; B, 0.2 mm; C, D, G, H, 0.02 mm; F, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 95. +eaplçstçma pẚngue +sp. nov. +, female. A, labrum and mandibles; B, maxilliped; C, leg 1; D, leg 5; E, genital aperture. Scale bars: A-C, E, 0.02 mm; D, 0.1 mm. + + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 95A +) with 6 tapering lobes along posterior margin; these labral lobes slightly longer than wide, 2 medial lobes each with partial subdivision at distal third; second outer lobes slightly longer than other 4. Mandible ( +Figs. 94F +, +95A +) as small lobe tipped with 2 setae; inner seta thicker than outer. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 95B +) consisting of 4 segments plus terminal claw; first segment much broader than long, unarmed; second segment about 1.3 times longer than wide, bearing 2 equal, small setae on medial side; third and fourth segments short and unarmed; terminal claw stout, unequally bifurcate. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 95C +) consisting of protopod and exopod; protopod unarmed, with broad inner distal protuberance representing endopod; exopod clearly articulated from protopod, armed with 1 seta and 4 simple spines. Legs 2-4 armed and shaped as in leg 1. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 95D +) conical, as long as wide, directed posterodorsally, with short dorsal and long ventral margins; armed with 3 small setae (1 proximal and 2 distal). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 95E +) represented by 1 small spine, 1 setule, and 5 (1 larger and 4 smaller) spiniform processes on genital operculum; 4 internal spiniform elements present near leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +eaplçstçma pẚngue +sp. nov. +possesses six large lobes along the posterior margin of the labrum. This derived feature is shared with +e +. +banyulensẚs +(Brément, 1909), +e +. +eruca +(Norman, 1869), and +e +. +kẚmẚ +Seo & Lee, 2001 +. The first two of these species were redescribed by +Ooishi (2004a) +and +Ooishi & O’Reilly (2004) +, respectively. These four species can be readily distinguished from one another by the different armature of the caudal rami; the armature formulae of the caudal rami are: II+3 (2 spines and 3 setae) in +eK pẚngue +sp. nov. +, III+ +2 in +e +. +banyulensẚsI +I+ +2 in +e +. +kẚmẚ +, and II+ +1 in +e +. +eruca +. These species also differ in the armature patterns of the exopods of legs 1-4. + + +The exopods of legs 1-4 of +e +. +pẚngue +sp. nov. +are all armed with 4 spines and 1 seta (the combination 5, 5, 5, and 5). Only +e +. +ambẚguum +Ooishi & Illg, 1977 is known to share this armature combination with +e +. +pẚngue +sp. nov., +however, +e +. +ambẚguum +differs from +e +. +pẚngue +sp. nov. +in having only 4 weak lobes on the posterior margin of the labrum, 1 spine and 3 setae (formula I+3) on the caudal ramus, an outer seta on the protopod of legs 1-4, and in lacking a free abdomen. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF75FF67FA93FF10D7281843.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF75FF67FA93FF10D7281843.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..482fe403411 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF75FF67FA93FF10D7281843.xml @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma gracile + +sp. nov. + + + +(Fig. 93) + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1994, as a whole mount on a slide) from +ieptçclẚnẚdes +sp.; +New Caledonia +, no other collection data. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +gracẚl +(=slender), referring to the elongate, vermiform body of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body (Fig. 93A) extremely elongate, vermiform, straight, consisting of unsegmented trunk and small abdomen. Body 11 times longer than wide; length +3.25 mm +and maximum width 286 μm, across region of leg 3. Cephalosome (Fig. 93B) obscurely defined from and narrower than metasome. Intervals between first to fourth legs 409, 614, 764 μm, respectively; distance from leg 4 to posterior tip of urosome 1182 μm. Genital apertures not seen. Abdomen (Fig. 93C) small, slightly longer than wide (116×103 μm), incompletely articulated from metasome, lacking any trace of segmentation, slightly narrowing posteriorly, with convex rear margin. Caudal ramus (Fig. 93C) as small semicircular lobe lacking caudal setae. + +Rostrum absent (Fig. 93B). Antennule (Fig. 93D) as transparent lobe, unsegmented and unarmed. Antenna (Fig. 93D) small, indistinctly 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed, but well-sclerotized; distal segment short, armed with 4 equal, simple spines. +Labrum small, slit-like, unornamented (Fig. 93B). Mandible, maxillule, and maxilla absent. Maxilliped (Fig. 93E, F) short, indistinctly segmented, tipped with small, simple, spiniform claw. +Legs 1-4 adhering closely to ventral surface of metasome, extremely flattened dorsoventrally, not observable in anterior or posterior views; endopods not discernible. Exopods armed only with spines, lacking seta, ornamented with numerous minute spinules. Leg 1 (Fig. 93G) with 5 small bifurcate spines on exopod. Leg 2 (Fig. 93H) with 1 small bifurcate spine on protopod and 4 bifurcate spines on exopod. Leg 3 (Fig. 93I) with 4 bifurcate spines on exopod. Leg 4 armed as in leg 3. Legs 5 and 6 not discernible. + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +In having 5, 4, 4, and 4 spines, respectively, on the exopods of legs 1-4, +eK gracẚle +sp. nov. +belongs to the so-called subgroup 2 of +Ooishi (1998 +, +2009b +). However, detailed comparison with its congeners in the subgroup is unnecessary since it exhibits numerous outstanding features, including: (1) the body is extremely elongate, about 11 times longer than wide; (2) the abdomen is reduced to a small segment; (3) the caudal rami are rudimentary and lack setae; (4) the antennae and legs 1-5 are adpressed to the ventral surface of the body; (5) the mouthparts are represented only by the maxilliped; and (6) leg 5 is absent. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF78FF6AFA93FEA1D4FC1AAF.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF78FF6AFA93FEA1D4FC1AAF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..63d02f4433e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF78FF6AFA93FEA1D4FC1AAF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,282 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma fusiforme + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 102 +, +103 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21518) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17386) from +mareugyrẚçẚdes galatheae +(Millar, 1959) (MNHN-IT-2008-6004 = +MNHN +S3 +/ +PAR +.A/11); +Kerguelen Is., SW +Heard +I., +MD03 +-ICTHYO cruise, +RV +”Marion Dufresne”, +Stn +12-36-CP08, + +Bassin +de Crozet + +( +55°49.5’S +, +69°35.7’E +), depth + +4200-4225 m + +, + +11 April 1974 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species alludes to its fusiform body. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 102A, B +) large, fusiform, tapering anteriorly and posteriorly. Body length +3.80 mm +and maximum width +1.30 mm +in +holotype +; dissected +paratype +3.35 mm +long. Cephalosome not defined from first metasomite, but indistinct trace of suture present between them dorsally. Four metasomites distinctly defined by 3 deep constrictions; last metasomite compound, consisting of fused fourth and fifth pedigerous somites, narrowing posteriorly. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 102C +) tapering posteriorly, about 500 μm long, occupying about 15% of body length, 2-segmented; anterior somite 1.33 times wider than long, with broad dorsal stripe between genital apertures; genital apertures large, positioned dorsolaterally; posterior somite (free abdomen) about 1.3 times wider than long, half as long as anterior somite. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 102D +) conical, about 1.47 times longer than wide (91×62 μm), 0.63 times as long as free abdominal somite; armed with 2 small setae (1 subdistal dorsal and 1 on outer margin) and 1 distal spine bearing small subsidiary denticle on outer margin. + + +Rostrum small, semicircular, unornamented. Antennule ( +Fig. 102E +) incompletely 3-segmented, tapering; armed with 1, 5, and 12 small setae on first to third segments, respectively; second seta of second segment with enlarged base fused to segment. Antenna ( +Fig. 102F +) 3-segmented; first segment (coxa) short and unarmed; second segment (basis) slightly longer than wide, unarmed; third segment (endopod) swollen proximally, narrowing distally; armed with 4 spines, becoming gradually larger from proximal to distal; distal spine bearing 3 or 4 spinules. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 102G +) short and broad, with simple convex posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 102H +) elongate, tapering, with 1 distal seta and 1 small subdistal seta. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped 4-segmented; first and third segments unarmed; second segment with 2 small setae; fourth segment with 1 small seta distally; terminal claw short, bearing small dentiform process proximally on inner margin. + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of protopod, exopod, and endopod; protopod lacking outer seta; endopod not clearly defined from protopod, but extending to distal end of exopodal segment. Exopod of leg 1 ( +Fig. 102I +) armed with 1 seta and 4 spines (3 small proximal and 1 larger distal). Exopod of leg 2 ( +Fig. 103A +) armed with 1 seta and 3 spines (2 small proximal and 1 larger distal). Exopod of legs 3 ( +Fig. 103B +) and 4 armed with 1 seta and 2 distal spines. In legs 3 and 4, two distal spines on exopod fused at base. Larger distalmost spine on exopods of legs 1-4 distally trifurcate or quadrifurcate. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 102J +) small, papilla-like ( +Fig. 102A, B +), bearing 2 minute setae distally. Leg 6 represented by 1 spine and 1 spiniform process (at low magnification). + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The combination of armature elements on the exopods of legs 1-4 of +eK fusẚfçrme +sp. nov. +is 5, 4, 3, and 3. This combination is shared by six other species of +eaplçstçma +; +e +. +albẚcatum +, +e +. +dentatum +, +e +. +elegans +, +e +. +mẚnutum +, +e +. +eruca +, and +e +. +depressum + +sp. nov. + + + +eaplçstçma fusẚfçrme +sp. nov. +can be distinguished from +e +. +dentatum +, +e +. +eruca +and +e +. +depressum + +sp. nov +. + +by the absence of any lobes or processes on the posterior margin of the labrum (cf. 8 pointed lobes in +e +. +dentatum +, 6 lobes in +e +. +eruca +, and 4 lobes in +e +. +depressum + +sp. nov. + +), and from +e +. +albẚcatum +, +e +. +elegans +, and +e +. +mẚnutum +by the absence of an outer seta on the protopod of legs 1-4. The new species can be differentiated further from +e +. +albẚcatum +and +eK mẚnutum +by the narrower caudal ramus which is about 1.5 times longer than wide (cf. wider than long in +e +. +albẚcatum +and +e +. +mẚnutum +) and from +e +. +elegans +by the possession of 2 setae on the mandible (cf. 3 setae in +e +. +elegans +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF7AFF56FA93FB86D7F31F6B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF7AFF56FA93FB86D7F31F6B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d8d0cf50820 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF7AFF56FA93FB86D7F31F6B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma mammiferum + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Fig. 104 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21519, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +ieptçclẚnẚdes +sp.; +Papua New Guinea +, +CRRF +coll.,1999. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name reflects the presence of a prominent posterodorsal mammiform process on the last metasomite of the female. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 104A, B +) eruciform, consisting of cephalosome, 4-segmented metasome, and 2-segmented genitoabdomen. Body length +1.37 mm +; maximum width 435 μm across second metasomite. Ceph- alosome 280×330 μm, narrower than metasome; 4 metasomites distinctly defined by deep constrictions; last meta- somite compound, comprising fourth and fifth pedigerous somites, subdivided by ventral constriction, characteristically bearing distinct median tubercle posterodorsally (indicated by arrowhead in +Fig. 104B, C +). Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 104C +) small; anterior somite 130×237 μm; genital apertures located dorsally; posterior somite (free abdomen) clearly articulated from anterior somite, 46×62 μm. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 104D +) about 1.3 times longer than wide (33×25 μm) tapering; armed with 2 equal setae and 2 unequal spines, larger distal spine twice as long as smaller subdistal spine. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 104E +) short, semicircular, fringed with thick, transparent surface layer. Antennule ( +Fig. 104F +) indistinctly 2-segmented; armed with 2 setae on proximal segment and 16 setae on small distal segment; all setae small. Antenna ( +Fig. 104G +) 2-segmented; proximal segment slightly longer than wide, unarmed; distal segment (endopod) about 2.4 times longer than wide (45×19 μm); armed with 5 stout spines (2 distal and 3 on inner margin), third inner margin spine largest and outermost of distal spines smallest. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 104H +) with 4 transparent lobes on posterior margin, 2 median lobes larger and semicircular, and 2 lateral lobes smaller, nipple-shaped. Mandible ( +Fig. 104H +) positioned lateral to labrum, as lobe tipped with 1 seta. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 104I +) robust, 4-segmented; second segment bearing 2 small setae, other segments unarmed; terminal claw unarmed and unornamented. + + +Leg 1-4 consisting of protopod, exopod, and endopodal protrusion; exopods evenly tapering. Leg 1 ( +Fig. 104J +) exopod armed with 1 seta and 3 small simple spines; endopod much broader than long. Legs 2 and 3 shaped and armed as leg 1. Leg 4 ( +Fig. 104K +) exopod armed with 1 seta and 4 spines; endopod narrower than for legs 1-3. + + + +FIG. 104. +eaplçstçma mammẚferum +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, left; C, posterior end of body, dorsal; D, caudal ramus; E, rostrum; F, antennule; G, antenna; H, labrum; I, maxilliped; J, leg 1; K, leg 4; L, leg 5; M, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, B, 0.2 mm; C, 0.1 mm; D-K, M, 0.02 mm; L, 0.05mm. + + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 104L +) small, stout, as long as wide, bearing 3 setae (1 proximal and 2 distal). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 104M +) represented by 2 broad, pointed processes and 5 smaller, dentiform elements on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +eaplçstçma mammẚferum +sp. nov. +exhibits three unique features, each of which clearly differentiates it from other species, as follows: (1) the last metasomite bears a distinct median tubercle posterodorsally; (2) the labrum bears 4 lobes on the posterior margin, 2 larger median and 2 smaller lateral lobes; and (3) the exopod is armed with 1 seta and 3 spines in legs 1-3, but with 1 seta and 4 spines in leg 4. This last feature is especially remarkable because in legs 1-4 of all previously known species of +eaplçstçma +, the numbers of armature elements on the exopods of legs 1 to 4 generally reduce from anterior (leg 1) to posterior (leg 4). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF7DFF6DFA93FB21D0E71E64.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF7DFF6DFA93FB21D0E71E64.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e9205343343 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF7DFF6DFA93FB21D0E71E64.xml @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma brevicaudum +(Canu, 1886) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 99 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +3 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1999, +1 ♀ +dissected) in + +Apl +ẚdẚum turbẚnatum + +(Savigny, 1816), +Dinard +, +Atlantic +coast of +France + +; + +2 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-2000, +1 ♀ +dissected) in +A +. +turbẚnatum +, +Roscoff +, +France + +. + + +Supplementary description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 99 +) eruciform, fleshy, curved dorsally, consisting of cephalosome, 4-segmented metasome, and 1-segmented genitoabdomen. Body length +1.93 mm +. Cephalosome ( +Fig. 99B +) narrowing anteriorly, narrower than metasome, indistinctly defined from first metasomite. Metasome gradually broadening posteriorly, incompletely 4-segmented; last metasomite compound, consisting of fused fourth and fifth pedigerous somites. Genitoabdomen tapering posteriorly, subdivided by weak constriction ( +Fig. 99C +). Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 99C +) tapering, about 1.6 times longer than wide (50×31 μm), obscurely defined from genitoabdomen; armed with 1 distal spine and 2 small setae (1 dorsal and 1 on outer margin). + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 99D +) as small anterior protuberance of cephalosome, characteristically bearing 2 saw-like transverse rows of denticles. Antennule ( +Fig. 99E +) tapering, unsegmented, but with 3 partial suture lines along posterior side, armed with 17 setae, several on anterior margin broadened. Antenna ( +Fig. 99F +) 3-segmented; first segment (coxa) short and unarmed; second segment (basis) also unarmed; third segment (endopod) slightly longer than second and ornamented with several minute spinules near base of distalmost spine; armed with 4 simple spines, all articulated at base, distalmost spine smaller than second distal spine. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 99G +) with convex posterior margin produced into 3 very weak lobes (appearing as wavy portions of posterior margin) on each side. Mandible ( +Fig. 99G +) represented by single seta tipped on small papilla-like lobe. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 99H +) stout, 4-segmented; first segment much wider than long, unarmed; second segment wider than long, with 2 small setae on medial side; third segment unarmed; fourth segment with 1 minute seta on anterior surface; terminal claw small, with blunt dentiform protuberance proximally on medial margin. + + + +FIG. 99. +eaplçstçma brevẚcaudum +(Canu, 1886), female. A, habitus, right; B, cephalic region, dorsal; C, abdomen, dorsal; D, rostral area, ventral (A1 indicating base of antennule); E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum and mandibles; H, maxilliped; I, leg 1; J, leg 4; K, leg 2; L, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, 0.1 mm; B, 0.1 mm; C-L, 0.02 mm. + + + +Legs 1-4 consisting of protopod, exopod, and endopod; protopods lacking outer seta; exopods not articulated from protopod; endopods present as semicircular mediodistal protuberance on each protopod. Exopod of leg 1 ( +Fig. 99I +) with 1 seta and 4 spines (3 small and 1 larger distal). Exopod of leg 2 ( +Fig. 99K +) with 1 seta and 3 spines, proximal spine markedly smaller than distal 2. Leg 3 shaped and armed as leg 2. Exopod of leg 4 ( +Fig. 99J +) with same armature formula as in legs 2 and 3, but proximal spine larger than distal. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 99A +) as blunt tubercle on last metasomite bearing 3 minute setae (1 proximal and 2 distal). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 99L +) represented by 1 spine and 1 spiniform process on genital operculum; 9 dentiform internal elements accompanied with leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +In her redescription of +eK brevẚcauda +, +Ooishi (2004b) +mentioned and figured the presence of an outer seta on the protopod of legs 1-4 of this species. Although we failed to observe that seta, we were able to confirm close agreement between Ooishi’s redescription and our specimens, including the same combination of the armature on the exopods of leg 1-4, the small, blunt leg 5, the presence of 6 weak lobes on the labrum, the presence of 9 dentiform internal elements near leg 6, and, most of all, the presence of 2 rows of 9 denticles on the ventral surface of the rostrum. On this basis our material from +France +is identified as conspecific with Ooishi’s material. The suffix – +stçma +is neuter so +eK brevẚcauda +(Canu, 1886) is here amended to +e +. +brevẚcaudum +(Canu, 1886). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF7FFF6AFA93FCE1D6861DA7.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF7FFF6AFA93FCE1D6861DA7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..95551bb85ce --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF7FFF6AFA93FCE1D6861DA7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,274 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Haplostoma depressum + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 100 +, +101 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2009-5190), +4 ♀♀ +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2014-21515), and +2 ♀♀ +para- types (dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17385) from +Aplẚdẚçpsẚs pyrẚfçrmẚs +(Herdman, 1886); Kerguelen, +MD42 +- +SIBEX +cruise, +RV +“Marion Dufresne”, Stn 4/CP25 ( +53°11’S +, +74°05’E +), depth + +285-375 m + +, +MNHN +coll., + +14 January 1985 + +. + + + +Additional material. +4 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-21516) from +Aplẚdẚum fuegẚense +Cunningham, 1871; Kerguelen, no other locality data; + +7 ♀♀ +in +A +. +pyrẚfçrmẚs +, SSE +Kerguelen Is. +, +MD04 +-BENTHOS cruise, +R +. +V +. “Marion Dufresne”, +Stn DC +275 ( +49°58’S +, +70°29’E +), depth + +234 m + +, +Boury-Esnault +coll., + +15 March 1975 + + +. + + + + +Etymology. +The body of the new species is dorsoventrally depressed, hence its name. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 100 +A-C) eruciform, slightly depressed dorsoventrally, consisting of cephalosome, 4-segmented metasome, and small genitoabdomen. Body length +1.91 mm +in dissected specimen ( +Fig. 100B +); maximum width 740 μm across last metasomite and maximum dorsoventral depth 542 μm. Cephalosome distinctly narrower than metasome, metasome gradually broadening posteriorly, obscurely segmented in dorsal and ventral views ( +Fig. 100A, B +), but metasomites distinctly defined by dorsal and ventral constrictions ( +Fig. 100C +). Compound last metasomite consisting of fused fourth and fifth pedigerous somites. Genitoabdomen ( +Fig. 100D +) as long as wide (262×258 μm), 2-segmented; anterior somite subcircular, with traces of 2 suture lines on dorsal sur- face; small posterior somite (free abdomen) distinctly defined from anterior somite, wider than long in contracted specimen ( +Fig. 100D +), but longer than wide in relaxed specimen ( +Fig. 100E +). Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 100F +) strongly tapering, armed with 2 setae (1 dorsal and 1 on outer margin) and 2 distal spines. Distal spines (ventral and dorsal) on caudal ramus unequal; ventral spine smaller and simple; larger dorsal spine bifurcate, with pointed dorsal and blunt ventral branches; ventral branch invariably ornamented with 1 or 2 minute spinules subdistally. + + +Rostrum as small, semicircular anterior protuberance on cephalosome. Antennule ( +Fig. 100G +) 3-segmented; articulation incomplete between 2 distal segments; armed with 2, 2, and 13 small setae on first to third segments, respectively; one seta on second segment consisting of extremely swollen proximal half and slender distal half. Antenna ( +Fig. 100H +) 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; distal segment 2.6 times longer than wide (43×16 μm), as long as proximal, armed with 4 simple spines, proximal 2 smaller than distal 2; all spines distinctly articulated at base. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 100I +) bearing 4 broad lobes on posterior margin, lateral lobes longer, prominent, medial lobes short. Labium well-developed, located posterior to labrum. Mandible ( +Fig. 100J +) distinctly 2-segmented; tapering proximal segment unarmed; distal segment 1.8 times longer than wide, tipped with 2 equal setae. Maxillule and maxilla absent. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 101A +) 4-segmented; broad first segment unarmed; second segment also wider than long, bearing 2 leaf-like setae; short third segment unarmed; fourth segment with 1 small seta distally; terminal claw unequally bifurcate. + + + +FIG. 100. +eaplçstçma depressum + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, B, habitus, dorsal; C, habitus, left; D, genitoabdomen, dorsal; E, abdomen, dorsal; F, right caudal ramus, medial; G, antennule; H, antenna; I, labrum, mandibles, and labium; J, mandible. Scale bars: A-C, 0.2 mm; D, E, 0.05 mm; F-J, 0.02 mm + + + + +FIG. 101. +eaplçstçma depressum + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, maxilliped; B, leg 1; C, leg 2; D, leg 3; E, leg 5; F, genital aperture. Scale bars: A-D, F, 0.02 mm; E, 0.05 mm. + + + +Legs 1-4 each consisting of protopod, exopod, and endopod; protopods lacking outer seta. Exopods incompletely articulated from protopods. Endopods prominent, semicircular, indistinctly defined from protopods. Exopod of leg 1 ( +Fig. 101B +) armed with 1 seta and 4 simple spines, proximal 2 spines smaller than distal 2. Exopod of leg 2 ( +Fig. 101C +) armed with 1 seta and 3 simple spines; spines becoming larger from proximal to distal. Exopod of leg 3 ( +Fig. 101D +) armed with 1 seta and 2 simples spines. Leg 4 shaped and armed as leg 3. + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 101E +) short, wider than long, strongly tapering towards blunt apex; armed with 1 subdistal and 2 distal, small setae. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 101F +) 1 small spine, 2 unequal, spiniform processes, and 1 small setule on genital operculum; 5 internal dentiform elements present near leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The combination of armature elements on the exopods of legs 1-4 of +e +. +depressum + +sp. nov. + +is 5, 4, 3, and 3, as in +e +. +albẚcatum +, +e +. +dentatum +Ooishi & Illg, 1977, +e +. +elegans +Ooishi & Illg, 1977, +e +. +mẚnutum +, and +e +. +eruca +. +eaplçstçma depressum + +sp. nov. + +can be clearly distinguished from those five species as well as all other congeners by the three following features: (1) the caudal ramus is armed with 2 spines and 2 setae; (2) the labrum bears 4 lobes on the posterior margin; and (3) the mandible is 2-segmented. Although the second feature is shared with +e +. + + +ambẚguum +, the 4 lobes on the labrum of the latter species are equally weak, unlike the combination of 2 large lateral and 2 weak medial lobes in the new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF82FF9FFA93FF10D6171DA7.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF82FF9FFA93FF10D6171DA7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cec7664dab0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF82FF9FFA93FF10D6171DA7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,206 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Schizoproctus magnus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 65 +, +66 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1976, dissected and mounted on 2 slides) from +myura bçuvetensẚs +Michaelsen, 1904 (MNHN-IT-2008-7430 = +MNHN +S2 +/ +PYU/450 +); Antarctic, Terre Adélie, CEAMARC cruise, +RV +“Aurore Australis”, Stn 31EV268 ( +66°35´S +, +145°01´E +), depth + +429-451 m + +, IPEV-AAD-MNHN coll., + +03 January 2008 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from the Latin +magn +(=large), referring to the large body size. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 65A, B +) large, slender, +4.88 mm +long; maximum width +1.03 mm +. Anterior part of body unsegmented, with weak constriction dorsally and laterally between cephalosome and remaining part; legs 5 directed laterally, perpendicular to body axis. Posterior part of body narrower and slightly shorter than anterior part, not articulated from anterior part, gradually narrowing posteriorly, consisting of genital and abdomen of 6 annulations; annulations indistinct or separated by constrictions. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 65C +) as long as wide (120×120 μm), armed with 4 claws and 2 small setae; claws shorter than ramus, 2 shorter, outer distal claws bluntly tipped, 1 rudimentary. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 65D +) small, semicircular with rounded apex. Antennule ( +Fig. 65D +) 417 μm long, 5-segmented; armature formula 12, 6, 3, 4, and 7; first segment much broader than other segments; setae small, much shorter than width of first segment. Left antenna ( +Fig. 65E +) 4-segmented; coxa, basis, and first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment about 3.3 times longer than wide (92×28 μm), slightly shorter than basis, armed with 8 bluntly tipped, smooth setae. Right antenna as for left, but second inner seta on distal margin of second endopodal segment ( +Fig. 65F +) longer than that of left antenna. + + +Labrum weak, semicircular, with rounded posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 65G +) with 3 teeth on coxal gnathobase, distalmost tooth finely spinulose along proximal margin; palp with 9 setae arranged as 3, 1, 1, 2, and 2. Maxillule ( +Fig. 65H +) consisting of precoxa and palp: precoxa with 7 setae on medial margin and 1 rudimentary seta distally; proximalmost seta specialized, tipped with pinnate setule; palp consisting of coxa, basis, and endopod, with 1 small seta on coxal epipodite, 2 medial and 3 (proximal 1 naked and weak) outer setae on basis; endopod articulated from basis, with 3 setae on distal margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 65I +) 2-segmented; first segment with 3 setae; second segment with bilobed tubercles on outer margin and 6 setae, distal seta naked and accompanied by minute tubercle (setal vestige) near base. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 66A +) 4-segmented; syncoxa longer than wide, with 2 small setae on inner side; basis much shorter than syncoxa, with 2 small setae; first endopodal segment short and unarmed; second endopodal segment with 1 small seta on inner margin; terminal claw smooth, shorter than second endopodal segment. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 66 +B-E) biramous with 1-segmented exopods and endopods; coxa and basis indistinctly defined from or fused with each other; coxa unarmed; coxa of leg 1 with large tubercle on inner side ( +Fig. 66B +). Basis with numerous minute spinules on anterior surface. Legs 1 and 2 with small outer seta on basis, but legs 3 and 4 with unarmed basis. Exopods longer than endopods. Spines on exopods rod-shaped, roundly tipped, gradually becoming longer from proximal to distal, but inner subdistal spine rudimentary. Legs 3 and 4 not different from each other. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-0VI, 18
Leg 20-01-0VI, 19
Legs 3 & 40-00-0VI, 17
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 66F +) elongate, tapering distally, as long as body width (1.00× +0.34 mm +), directed dorsolaterally; armed with 4 rudimentary setae (1 at proximal third, 1 at distal third, and 2 distally). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 66G +) represented by 1 spinule, 1 spinule-like process, and 1 small setule on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Schẚzçprçctus magnus + +sp. nov. + +is readily recognizable by having an abdomen of 6 annulations, although the separation of the annulations is incomplete, and by the characteristic leg 5 which is elongate, tapering, and dorsolaterally directed. The combination of setal numbers on the endopods of legs 1-4 (8-9-7-7) of the new species is unique within the genus ( +Table 3 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF87FF91FA93F99ED49F18B3.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF87FF91FA93F99ED49F18B3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2b5124ff929 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF87FF91FA93F99ED49F18B3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,384 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus nudisetatus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 63 +, +64 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1975) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17377) from +budẚstçma carçlẚnense +Van Name +, 1945 (MNHN-IU-2008-4023 = +MNHN +A3 +/ +EUD/14 +); +Anse de Baille Argent +, +Guadeloupe +Stn +7, +Monniot +coll., + +19 December 1980 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +All setae on legs of +B +. +nudẚsetatus +sp. nov +. are naked, and are alluded to in the name of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 63A +) symmetrical, straight, +0.93 mm +long. Anterior part of body markedly swollen, unsegmented, without any trace of articulation, +0.38 mm +in dorsoventral depth. Posterior part of body ( +Fig. 63B +) clearly defined from anterior part, consisting of genital somite and 4-segmented abdomen. Genital somite 82×165 μm; genital apertures large, positioned dorsally; 4 abdominal somites 58×102, 67×95, 65×85, and 109×76 μm, respectively. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 63C +) armed with 1 bluntly tipped and 3 pointed claws and 1 seta. + + + +FIG. 63. +Bçtryllçphẚlus nudẚsetatus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, right; B, posterior part of body, dorsal; C, caudal ramus; D, antennule; E, right antenna; F, endopod of left antenna; G, labrum; H, mandible; I, maxillule; J, maxilla; K, maxilliped. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C-J, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 64. +Bçtryllçphẚlus nudẚsetatus +sp. nov. +, female. A, right leg 1; B, left leg 1; C, right leg 2; D, left leg 2; E, right leg 3; F, left leg 3; G, right leg 4; H, left leg 4; I, leg 5; J, genital aperture. Scale bars: A-H, J, 0.02 mm; I, 0.05 mm. + + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 63D +) small, 4-segmented; armature formula 9 (4 large and 5 small), 4 (2 large and 2 small), 3 (1 large and 2 small), and 11+aesthetasc. Right antenna ( +Fig. 63E +) consisting of coxa, basis, and 2-segmented endopod; proximal 3 segments unarmed; second endopodal segment about 3.1 times longer than wide (47×15 μm), armed with 7 bluntly tipped setae, longest outer distal seta as long as segment, other setae shorter than segment. Second endopodal segment of left antenna ( +Fig. 63F +) slightly shorter than that of right antenna, 43 μm long; 2 outer distal setae distinctly longer than those of right antenna. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 63G +) semicircular with large, soft posteromedian lobe. Mandible ( +Fig. 63H +) with bifurcate distal tooth and 2 shorter teeth on coxal gnathobase; palp with 9 naked setae, grouped as 3, 2, 2, and 2. Maxillule ( +Fig. 63I +) consisting of precoxa and unsegmented palp; precoxa with 6 setae on arthrite; palp with 8 setae (2 on medial margin, 3 on outer margin, and 3 on distal margin) plus 1 vestigial seta at outer proximal margin representing epipodite; endopod completely fused with basis. Maxilla ( +Fig. 63J +) indistinctly 3-segmented, with 9 setae arranged as 2, 4, and 3. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 63K +) relatively narrow, 4-segmented; syncoxa slightly longer than wide, unarmed and unornamented; basis with 2 small setae; short first endopodal segment unarmed; second segment with 1 denticle on inner margin and 1 small seta on distal margin; terminal claw as long as second endopodal segment, with 1 proximal and 1 subdistal denticle on inner margin. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 64 +A-H) biramous with 1-segmented exopods and 2-segmented endopods; coxa unarmed; basis with 1 seta on outer margin. Basis of legs 2-4 with small inner distal lobe bearing 2-4 spinules. Endopods of right legs 2-4 bearing 3, 1, and 3 spines, respectively. All setae on legs 1-4 naked and all spines with spinulose tip. Exopods of left legs 1, 2, and 4 each with small second outer seta. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on right and left legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1V1; 651; 6
Leg 2IV1; III+341; 6
Leg 3III1; I+331; 4
Leg 4IV1; III+131; 4
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 64I +) 104×58 μm, with broadened proximal region, not extending beyond posterior margin of ante- rior part of body; armed with 4 setae (1 proximal and 3 distal); largest of 3 distal setae as long as leg segment, twice as long as adjacent seta. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 64J +) represented by 1 spinule on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The exopods of right legs 1-3 of +B +. +nudẚsetatus +sp. nov. +are armed with 5, 4, and 3 spines, respectively. Each of these numbers of spines is less than that of any other known species of +Bçtryllçphẚlus +. The other rami of the swimming legs of this new species are armed with smallest number of armature elements known elsewhere within the genus. This reduced armature of the swimming legs serves to characterize the new species. + + + +Genus + +Schizoproctus +Aurivillius, 1885 + + + + + + +Diagnosis +(female). Body symmetrical, dorsoventrally depressed or laterally compressed, consisting of broader anterior and narrower posterior parts. Anterior part of body segmented or unsegmented; fifth pedigerous somite completely fused with fourth pedigerous somite. Posterior part of body comprising genital somite and abdomen consisting of 3 to 6 somites or annulations; abdomen occasionally unsegmented. Caudal ramus short, armed with 4 or 5 claws and 1 or 2 setae. Rostrum small or absent. Antennule 4- or 5-segmented. Antenna 4-segmented; proximal 3-segments unarmed; terminal segment (second endopodal segment) armed with 8 elements (mostly spines). Labrum not specialized. Mandible, maxillule, and maxilla as in +Bçtryllçphẚlus +. Maxilliped basically 4-segmented as in +Bçtryllçphẚlus +, but terminal segment may be fused with terminal claw. Legs 1-4 symmetrical, biramous with 1-segmented rami; coxa unarmed; basis armed with 1 seta on outer margin; exopods armed with 4 to 7 spines along outer and distal margins plus 1 rudimentary inner subdistal seta in some species. Endopods usually shorter than exopods, and usually armed with setae. Leg 5 elongate or lamellate, with 1 to 4 setae. Leg 6 represented by 1 or 2 spinules and 1 spinule-like process on genital operculum. + + + + + +Type +species. + +Schẚzçprçctus ẚnflatus +Aurivillius, 1885 +by original monotypy. + + + + +Remarks. +According to Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +, the genus +Schẚzçprçctus +was a well-established, readily recognizable genus defined from +Bçtryllçphẚlus +by its broad, lamellate leg 5. This distinction between the two genera, on the basis of the form of leg 5, has become obscured by the discovery of new species in the present account which exhibit a mix of the key morphological features of the two genera. + + +In three new species to be described below ( + +S +. +magnus + + +sp. nov. + +, +S +. +bẚsetatus +sp. nov. +, and +S +. +fusẚfçrmẚs +sp. nov. +), left and right legs 5 are narrow and widely separated from each other, a feature corresponding to +Bçtryllçphẚlus +. However, the characteristics of left and right legs 1-4 of these three new species differ markedly from those in species of +Bçtryllçphẚlus +, but are shared with other species of +Schẚzçprçctus +. Comparison of the two genera leads us to redefine both genera. The most robust differences between the two genera seem to lie in the morphology of swimming legs, as follows: (1) both rami of legs 1-4 of +Schẚzçprçctus +are 1-segmented, but at least the endopods of legs 2-4 of +Bçtryllçphẚlus +species are 2-segmented (in many instances the exopods are also 2-segmented); (2) left and right legs 1-4 of +Schẚzçprçctus +are invariably symmetrical, in contrast to the asymmetry of these legs in +Bçtryllçphẚlus +(with the exception of +B +. +macrçpus +which has symmetrical legs 1-4), with spines on the exopods and setae on the endopods. We consider that these differences are more robust than the difference in the form of leg 5 between these two genera. In addition, the body and the antennae are also typically symmetrical in +Schẚzçprçctus +, unlike those of +BçtryllçphẚlusK + + +Differences between the two genera are marked in the leg setation of the males, as well. While describing the male of +eaplçstçma brevẚcauda +(Canu, 1886), +Ooishi (2004b) +mentioned that the males of +eaplçstçma +are distinguished from the males of +Bçtryllçphẚlus +by having fewer spines on the third segment of leg 2 endopod. This segment is armed with 2 spines (occasionally 1 spine) plus 3 setae (formula generally II, 3 but occasionally I, 3) in +eaplçstçma +but 3 spines plus 3 setae (formula III, 3) in +Bçtryllçphẚlus +. The same segment of the leg of the male of +Schẚzçprçctus pẚnguẚs +sp. nov. +described in the present work is armed with 1 spine plus 3 setae (I, 3). The reduction in the number of spines on legs of the male of +Schẚzçprçctus +is not limited to the endopod of leg 2; the armature formula for the third endopodal segment of legs 3 and 4 is I, 2 and I, 4, respectively in +Schẚzçprçctus +, compared to II, 2 and II, 3, respectively, in males of +Bçtryllçphẚlus abbçttẚ +, +B +. +ruber +, +B +. +bamfẚeldensẚs +, and +B +. +banyulensẚs +(as described by Ooishi & Illg, 1989; +Ooishi, 1999 +; +2000 +; +2006 +, respectively). In contrast, the third exopodal segment of legs 2-4 of +S +. +pẚnguẚs +sp. nov. +, described below, is armed with more spines (IV, 5) than in any of the four known males of +Bçtryllçphẚlus +species (III, 5). + + +Schẚzçprçctus +exhibits a range of different leg armature patterns, according to species ( +Table 3 +), which allows for easy differentiation between species. + + + +TABLE 3. +Armature of caudal ramus and legs 1-5 of +Schẚzçprçctus +species (* indicates lack of an endopod; Roman numerals indicate spines, Arabic numerals indicate setae) + + +. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF89FF98FA93FA7AD0AC1ED7.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF89FF98FA93FA7AD0AC1ED7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..48ffd912a72 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF89FF98FA93FA7AD0AC1ED7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Schizoproctus fusiformis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 69 +, +70 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1978, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +mçlycarpa fẚbrçsa +(Stimpson, 1852); off Tromsø, +Norway +, +NORBI +Cruise +, +RV +“Jean Charcot”, +Stn CP +11 trawl, ( +69°52’N +, +17°08’E +), depth + +250-300 m + +, +Bouchet +& +Warén +coll., + +01 July 1975 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name refers to the fusiform anterior part of body of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 69A +) straight, with fusiform anterior part and narrower posterior part; body length +1.40 mm +. Anterior part 800×440 μm, not segmented, but cephalosome and 4 metasomal somites discernible by weak cephalic shield and 4 dorsal tergites. Fifth pedigerous somite not defined from fourth pedigerous somite. Posterior part of body consisting of genital somite and 4-segmented abdomen. Genital somite 250×220 μm, gradu- ally narrowing posteriorly; genital apertures positioned dorsally. Four abdominal somites 82×131, 90×118, 77×105, and 122×98 μm, respectively. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 69B +) wider than long, armed with 4 spines and 1 seta; outer distal spine very small, nipple-shaped, not articulated from ramus. + + + +FIG. 69. +Schẚzçprçctus fusẚfçrmẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, caudal ramus; C, antennule; D, antenna; E, labrum; F, mandible; G, maxillule; H, maxilla; I, maxilliped. Scale bars: A, 0.1 mm; B-D, F-I, 0.02 mm; E, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 70. +Schẚzçprçctus fusẚfçrmẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 2; C, leg 3; D, left leg 5; E, right leg 5. Scale bars: A-C, 0.02 mm; D, E, 0.05 mm. + + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 69C +) short, 5-segmented; first segment broad; distal segments gradually narrowing; armature formula 12, 5, 3, 4, and 7+aesthetasc. Antenna ( +Fig. 69D +) 4-segmented; coxa, basis, and first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment about 4 times longer than wide (95×24 μm), with partial subdivision on inner side at distal third; armed with 8 spines (4 on inner margin and 4 on distal margin); spines on inner margin shorter than width of segment; longest second outer spine on distal margin 65 μm long, twice as long as second longest adjacent spine. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 69E +) weak, thin-walled, strongly tapering towards rounded distal margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 69F +) with 3 teeth on coxal gnathobase; palp with 9 setae and 1 large medial swelling; 3 outer proximal setae pinnate, but remaining distal setae naked. Maxillule ( +Fig. 69G +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa with 7 setae on arthrite, proximalmost seta bluntly tipped; palp consisting of coxa, basis, and endopod; coxa with vestigial seta on epipodite; basis with 2 setae on medial margin, 3 setae on outer margin (proximal seta naked, others pinnate), and bilobed distal tubercle; endopod distinctly articulated from basis, with 3 setae on distal margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 69H +) indistinctly 3-segmented with 9 setae (1 distal seta minute). Maxilliped ( +Fig. 69I +) 4-segmented, but second endopodal segment and terminal claw completely fused; syncoxa much broader than long, with 2 setae on inner margin; basis with 2 widely isolated setae; first endopodal segment short and unarmed; terminal segment (fused second endopodal segment and terminal claw) strongly curved, with 2 small setae proximally and 1 small subterminal denticle. + + +Legs 1 and 2 ( +Fig. 70A, B +) biramous with 1-segmented rami; endopods much smaller than exopods. Legs 3 and 4 uniramous with 1-segmented exopod; endopod lacking; third outer spine rudimentary. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-0VIII
Leg 20-01-0VII
Legs 3 & 40-01-0IV(endopod lacking)
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 70D, E +) 1-segmented, subrectangular: left leg 5 ( +Fig. 70D +) 2.93 times longer than wide (123×42 μm) with 1 proximal and 4 distal setae: right leg 5 ( +Fig. 70E +) 2.96 times longer than wide (142×48 μm), with 1 proximal and 3 distal setae; right leg 5 accompanied by 1 tubercle on fifth pedigerous somite near base of leg segment. Leg 6 not discernible. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +All known species of +Schẚzçprçctus +have biramous legs 1-4. Therefore, the possession of uniramous legs 3 and 4, lacking an endopod, in +S +. +fusẚfçrmẚs +sp. nov. +serves to distinguish the new species from all congeners. The armature patterns of legs 1 and 2 also are unique within the genus ( +Table 3 +). The fusion of the second endopodal segment with the terminal claw in the maxilliped of +S +. +fusẚfçrmẚs +sp. nov. +is a notable feature shared with the +type +species, +S +. +ẚnflatus +, and with +S +. +frẚgẚdus +sp. nov. +described below. Other morphological features of these two species also differ from those of +S +. +fusẚfçrmẚs +sp. nov +., such as the broad circular shape of their leg 5. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF8AFF85FA93FC71D5681F4F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF8AFF85FA93FC71D5681F4F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b503405cc8a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF8AFF85FA93FC71D5681F4F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,299 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Schizoproctus tripartitus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 71 +, +72 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1979) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(MNHN-IU-2014-17378, dissected) from + +Araneum +sẚgma + +Monniot C. +& +Monniot F. +, 1973 ( +syntypes +: MNHN-IT-2008-821, MNHN-IT-2008-826); +NE Atlantic +, BIACORES cruise, +RV +“Jean Charcot”, +Stns DS +126, CHG245, CHG-F249, depth + +3360-4690 m + +, +Boury-Esnault +coll., +October-November +1971. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species refers to the 3-segmented abdomen of the female. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 71A +) slightly dorsoventrally depressed, with thin exoskeleton; body length +0.98 mm +; width +0.35 mm +across cephalosome. Anterior part of body gradually narrowing posteriorly, consisting of cephalosome and 4 indistinctly separated metasomites; fourth metasomite consisting of completely fused fourth and fifth pedigerous somites. Posterior part of body ( +Fig. 71B +) consisting of genital somite and 3-segmented abdomen. Genital somite about 2.1 times wider than long (82×170 μm), distinctly wider than abdomen; genital apertures large, located dorsally. Abdomen with parallel lateral margins; first to third abdominal somites 73×118, 65×120, and 110×120 μm, respectively. Caudal rami divergent; each ramus ( +Fig. 71C +) about 1.7 times longer than wide (60×36 μm), with shorter outer and longer inner margins; armed with 5 straight claws and 1 seta; inner dorsal claw 12 μm long, accompanied by several spinules near base; lengths of 4 distal claws 27, 37, 28, and 10 μm. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 71D +) strongly tapering towards blunt apex; with rows of fine spinules ventrally along lateral margins. Antennule ( +Fig. 71E +) 5-segmented; first segment extremely inflated; armature formula 11, 5, 3, 4, and 7+aesthetasc. Antenna ( +Fig. 71F +) consisting of coxa, basis, and 2-segmented endopod; coxa and first endopodal segment unarmed; basis unarmed, but ornamented with 2 rows of fine spinules on inner distal surface; second endopodal segment about 3.2 times longer than wide (77×24 μm) and ornamented with 4 rows of fine spinules; armed with 8 spines (spines on inner margin shorter than width of segment), including 2 outer spines on distal margin longer than segment width, 38 (outer) and 41 μm long (inner). + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 71G +) weak, flexible, semicircular. Mandible ( +Fig. 71H +) with 4 major teeth on coxal gnathobase; palp with large tubercle near middle and 8 setae arranged as 3, 1, 2, and 2. Maxillule ( +Fig. 48I +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa with 8 unequal setae on arthrite, 2 distal setae rudimentary; palp consisting of coxa, basis, and endopod; armed with 1 vestigial seta on coxal epipodite, 2 medial and 3 outer setae on basis, and 3 setae on endopod; digitiform lobe present distally on basis. Maxilla ( +Fig. 71J +) indistinctly 3-segmented, with 2, 3, and 4 setae on first to third segments, respectively. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 72A +) 4-segmented; syncoxa and basis each with 2 small setae; first endopodal segment short and unarmed; second endopodal segment with 2 small setae subdistally; terminal claw shorter than second endopodal segment, with 1 small denticle proximally on inner margin. + + + +FIG. 71. +Schẚzçprçctus trẚpartẚtus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, posterior part of body, dorsal; C, caudal ramus; D, rostrum; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum; H, mandible; I, maxillule; J, maxilla. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C-G, I, J, 0.02 mm; H, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 72. +Schẚzçprçctus trẚpartẚtus +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilliped; B, leg 1; C, leg 2; D, leg 3; E, leg 5. Scale bars: A-D, 0.02 mm; E, 0.05 mm. + + + +Legs 1-4 biramous with 1-segmented rami ( +Fig. 72 +B-D); coxa unarmed; basis with outer seta and ornamented with patch of spinules on inner side of anterior surface, this patch of spinules becoming smaller from legs 1 to 4. Distalmost seta on endopod of leg 1 small and spiniform. Distal spines on endopods of legs 2-4 small. Leg 4 similar to leg 3, but endopod bearing only 1 spine and 1 seta. Inner subdistal seta on exopod of legs 1-4 rudimentary. Distal spines on endopod of legs 2 and 3 small. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-0V, 16
Leg 20-01-0IV, 1II+ 3
Leg 30-01-0IV, 1II+ 1
Leg 40-01-0IV, 1I+ 1
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 72E +) arising on posterodorsal surface of double metasomite (comprising fused fourth and fifth pedigerous somites); roughly quadrate, lamellate, longer than wide (159×130 μm,); armed with 4 setae, 1 distinctly larger than other 3. Leg 6 represented by 2 small spinules on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The setal combination on the endopods of legs 1-4 (6-5-3-2) of +SK trẚpartẚtus +sp. nov. +is unique within the genus (see +Table 3 +) and this allows the new species to be distinguished from all of its congeners. The 3-segmented abdomen of +S +. +trẚpartẚtus +sp. nov. +is a feature shared with +S +. +vestẚtus +( +Sars, 1921 +) and +S +. +mçllẚs +sp. nov. +described below. These two species are easy to distinguish from +S +. +trẚpartẚtus +sp. nov. +by the setation of endopods of legs 1-4 (the combination on the endopods of legs 1-4 is 3-2-?- +6 in +S +. +vestẚtus +(the setation of the endopod of leg 3 is unknown in +S +. +vestẚtus +) and 7-6-4- +3 in +S +. +mçllẚs +sp. nov. +). In addition there are two other significant differences, as follows: (1) the body length is +1.80 mm +in +S +. +vestẚtus +according to +Sars (1921) +, and +1.94 mm +in +S +. +mçllẚs +sp. nov. +, in contrast to +0.98 mm +in +S +. +trẚpartẚtus +sp. nov., +and (2) the exopods of legs 1-4 of +S +. +vestẚtus +and +S +. +mçllẚs +sp. nov. +are armed with 6 spines each, in contrast to 5 spines plus 1 seta in leg 1 and 4 spines plus 1 seta in legs 2-4 of +S +. +trẚpartẚtus +sp. nov. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF8FFF9CFA93FF10D66A1C33.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF8FFF9CFA93FF10D66A1C33.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..092c5b812f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF8FFF9CFA93FF10D66A1C33.xml @@ -0,0 +1,281 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Schizoproctus bisetatus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 67 +, +78 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1977, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +Caenagnesẚa bçckẚ +Ärnbäck-Christie-Linde, 1938 (MNHN-IT-2008-1840 = +MNHN +P3 +/ +CAE/6 +); Weddell Sea, +EPOS 3 +3 cruise, +RV +“Polarstern”, Stn +MG7 +( +75°05.5´S +, +28°01.0´W +), depth + +462 m + +, + +01 February 1989 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +bẚ +(=two) and +set +(=a bristle), referring to leg 5 of the new species, which is armed with 2 setae. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 67A +) symmetrical, narrow, +2.90 mm +long. Anterior part of body unsegment- ed; cephalosome defined from metasome by dorsal and lateral constrictions; metasome slightly inflated dorsally with convex dorsal margin in lateral view and narrower posterior part. Legs 4 and 5 positioned on same transverse plane. Posterior part of body ( +Fig. 67B +) slender, consisting of genital somite and 4-segmented abdomen, but articulation incomplete between last 2 somites. Genital somite 394×406 μm; 4 abdominal somites 187×315, 133×300, 188×255, and 242×182 μm, respectively. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 67C +) as long as wide, ornamented with 2 patches of minute spinules on ventral surface; armed with 5 claws and 1 seta; spine on subdistal inner margin setiform, pale. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 67D +) short, strongly tapering towards rounded apex. Antennule ( +Fig. 67E +) 5-segmented, forming right angle between first and remaining segments; armature formula 13, 5, 3, 4, and 7+aesthetasc; aesthetasc on last segment very small and similar in appearance to smaller setae. Antenna ( +Fig. 67F +) consisting of coxa, basis, and 2-segmented endopod; coxa short and unarmed; basis unarmed but ornamented with 2 patches of minute spinules subdistally; first endopodal segment short and unarmed; second endopodal segment about 3 times longer than wide (121×41 μm), with vestigial suture at distal third: armed with 8 spines (4 on inner margin and 4 on distal margin) and ornamented with 1 patch of minute spinules subdistally; fourth spine on inner margin shortest, and second outer spine on distal margin longest + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 67G +) small, unornamented, with broad posteromedial lobe. Mandible ( +Fig. 67H +) consisting of coxa and palp; coxal gnathobase with 3 teeth and finely spinulose proximal part on medial margin; palp with 9 setae arranged as 3, 2, 2, and 2. Maxillule ( +Fig. 67I +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa with 8 unequal setae on arthrite (including 2 small distal setae); palp consisting of coxa, basis, and endopod; coxa with 1 minute vestigial seta on epipodite; basis with 2 setae on medial margin, 3 setae on outer margin, and weakly bilobed process distally; endopod incompletely articulated from basis, with 3 setae on distal margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 68A +) obscurely 2-segmented, with 9 setae. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 68B +) 4-segmented with 2 setae on syncoxa, 2 on basis, and 1 on second endopodal segment; terminal claw as long as second endopodal segment, with 1 denticle proximally on inner margin. + + +Legs 1-4 biramous with 1-segmented exopods and endopods ( +Fig. 68C, D +), and unarmed coxa. Basis of leg 1 lacking outer seta, but with 2 patches of minute spinules on anterior surface. Basis of leg 2 unornamented, with short, very thin outer seta. Exopods of legs 1-4 armed with 7 spines, but inner subdistal spine rudimentary; ornamented with patch of fine spinules near base of outer and distal spines. Endopod of legs 1 and 2 ornamented with 3 patches of minute spinules on anterior surface. Outer proximal seta on endopod of legs 1 and 2 markedly shorter than other setae. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-00-0VI, 11, 2, 5
Leg 20-01-0VI, 11, 2, 5
Legs 3 & 40-01-0VI, 11, 2, 4
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 68E +) flattened, sub-rectangular, twice as long as wide (500×245 μm), armed with 2 setae on oblique distal margin. Leg 6 not seen. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks +. +Schẚzçprçctus bẚsetatus +sp. nov. +is most similar to + +S +. +magnus + + +sp. nov. + +because they share the same armature formula of legs 1-4, with the exception only of the endopod of leg 2 which bears 8 setae in +S +. +bẚsetatus +sp. nov. +compared to 9 setae in + +S +. +magnus + + +sp. nov. + +The main differences between these two species are as follows: (1) the abdomen is 4-segmented in +S +. +bẚsetatus +sp. nov +., but consists of 6 indistinct annulations in + +S +. +magnus + + +sp. nov. + +; (2) the caudal ramus is armed with 5 claws and 1 seta in +S +. +bẚsetatus +sp. nov. +, but with 4 claws and 2 setae in + +S +. +magnus + + +sp. nov. + +; (3) all setae on the antennule of +S +. +bẚsetatus +sp. nov. +are much shorter than the width of the first segment, whereas some of setae on the antennule of + +S +. +magnus + + +sp. nov. + +are large, as long as the width of the first segment; and (4) leg 5 is sub-rectangular with 2 distinct setae in +S +. +bẚsetatus +sp. nov., +but elongate and tapering with 4 rudimentary setae in + +S +. +magnus + + +sp. nov. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF90FF82FA93FEA1D1831AAF.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF90FF82FA93FEA1D1831AAF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..756e1615fb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF90FF82FA93FEA1D1831AAF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,216 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Schizoproctus oligomerus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 75 +, +76 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1981, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +mareugyrẚçẚdes chardyẚ +Monniot C. +& +Monniot F. +, 1977; +Gulf +of Gascogne, BIOGAS 6 cruise, +RV +“Jean Charcot”, +Stn CP +10 ( +47°30’N +, +09°04’W +), depth + +2878 m + +, +Station Marine d’Endoume +coll., + +21 October 1974 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is from Greek +çlẚgç +(=few) and +merçus +(=parted), referring to the oligomeric body. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 75A +) poorly segmented; +2.50 mm +long; maximum width +0.81 mm +. Anterior part of body divisible by incomplete suture into cephalosome and unsegmented metasome incorporating fifth pedigerous somite. Posterior part of body ( +Fig. 75B +) consisting of genital somite and unsegmented abdomen. Genital somite not articulated from anterior part, much wider than long, 409 μm wide; genital apertures located dorsally. Abdomen distinctly narrower than genital somite, about 800×259 μm, obscurely articulated from genital somite, unsegmented but with 3 indistinct transverse surface wrinkles. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 75C +) wider than long (98×103 μm), lamellate: armed with 5 spiniform claws and 1 small seta; claws straight, outer 4 claws fringed with narrow membrane along both margins, 67, 121, 150, 112, and 45 μm long from inner (dorsal) to outer (ventral). + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 75D +) short, 5-segmented; first segment markedly broadened; armature formula 12, 5, 2, 4, and 7+aesthetasc; all setae shorter than width of first segment. Antenna ( +Fig. 75E +) 4-segmented, consisting of coxa, basis, and 2-segmented endopod; proximal 3 segments unarmed; second endopodal segment about 3.4 times longer than wide (182×54 μm); armed with 8 spines (4 inner and 4 distal); proximal 2 spines on inner margin shorter than width of segment, all other spines longer than width of segment; second outer spine on distal margin longest, 130 μm. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 75F +) wider than long, with large posteromedian protuberance bearing 4 rows of minute spinules on surface. Mandible ( +Fig. 75G +) with 3 teeth on coxal gnathobase; palp with 8 setae. Maxillule ( +Fig. 75H +) with 8 setae (including 2 small distal setae) on precoxal arthrite, 1 small seta on coxal epipodite, 5 setae on basis (2 on medial and 3 on outer margins) and 3 setae on endopod. Maxilla ( +Fig. 75I +) 3-segmented with 2, 3, and 4 setae respectively on first to third segments; 2 of 4 setae on third segment small, setule-like. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 75J +) 4-segmented; syncoxa and basis broad, each with 2 setae; first endopodal segment short and unarmed; second endopodal segment with 2 minute setae; terminal claw longer than second endopodal segment, with 1 small denticle proximally on inner margin. + + +Legs 1-4 biramous with 1-segmented rami ( +Fig. 76A, B +); coxa unarmed; basis with 1 small outer seta and ornamented with inner patch of minute spinules on anterior surface; all exopods with 6 slender spines and 1 rudimentary inner subdistal seta. Distalmost spine on exopods much longer than other spines, at least twice as long as adjacent seta. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Legs 1 & 20-01-0VI, 17
Legs 3 & 40-01-0VI, 16
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 76C +) lamellate, about 564×542 μm, with rounded distal margin and 2 small setae distally (1 minute). + +Leg 6 represented by 1 spinule and 1 spinule-like process on genital operculum. + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The diagnostic features of +S +. +çlẚgçmerus +sp. nov. +include: (1) the abdomen is unsegmented (a unique feature); (2) the caudal ramus is armed with 5 claws and 1 seta (shared only with +S +. +bẚsetatus +sp. nov. +and +S +. +trẚpartẚtus +sp. nov. +); and (3) the armature of the endopods of legs 1-4 is 7, 7, 6, and 6 setae (a unique combination, see +Table 3 +). The combination of these three features serves to distinguish +S +. +çlẚgçmerus +sp. nov. +from all congeneric species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF92FF8EFA93FC64D5971A85.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF92FF8EFA93FC64D5971A85.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a284e97c738 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF92FF8EFA93FC64D5971A85.xml @@ -0,0 +1,238 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Schizoproctus mollis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 77 +, +78 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1982, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +Cẚçna ẚntestẚnalẚs +(Linnaeus, 1767) (MNHN-IT-2008-1886 = +MNHN +P1 +/ +CIO/24 +); +Locality +and date unknown, MNHN-Saint +Joseph +coll. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is from the Latin +mçll +(=soft), alluding to the weak exoskeleton of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 77A +) dorsoventrally depressed, with soft exoskeleton; body length +1.94 mm +. Anterior part of body gradually narrowing posteriorly, distinctly 5-segmented; last metasomite consisting of fused fourth and fifth pedigerous somites. Cephalosome 519×778 μm, with broadly rounded anterior margin. Posterior part of body consisting of genital somite and 3-segmented abdomen; genital and first 2 abdominal somites extremely soft, flexible. Genital apertures not seen. Caudal rami divergent; each ramus ( +Fig. 77B +) about 130×72 μm, armed with 4 distal claws and 2 setae; lengths of claws 110, 115, 39, and 74 μm, respectively, from inner to outer. + + +Rostrum small, less than half length of first antennular segment, semicircular, slightly longer than wide. Antennule ( +Fig. 77C +) 5-segmented, evenly tapering; articulation between first 2 segments indistinct; armature formula 10, 4, 2, 2, and 8. Antenna ( +Fig. 77D +) consisting of coxa, basis, and 2-segmented endopod; proximal 3 segments unarmed; second endopodal segment about 4 times longer than wide (185×46 μm), as long as basis; armed with 8 spines; longest second outer spine on distal margin 123 μm long, 0.66 times as long as segment. + + +Labrum very weak, flexible. Mandible ( +Fig. 77E +) with 3 teeth on coxal gnathobase; palp with 9 setae arranged as 3, 1, 1, 2, and 2. Maxillule ( +Fig. 77F +) with 8 setae (including minute distalmost seta) on precoxal arthrite, 5 setae (2 inner and 3 outer) on basis, and 3 setae on endopod. Maxilla ( +Fig. 77G +) 3-segmented with incomplete articulation between basis and endopod; armed with 2, 2, and 4 setae on proximal to distal segments. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 77H +) 4-segmented; syncoxa unarmed; basis with 2 setae; first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment with 1 small seta; terminal claw longer than second endopodal segment. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 78 +A-D) biramous with 1-segmented rami; coxa unarmed; basis with small outer seta. Exopods of legs 1-4 each with 6 slender spines. Seven setae on endopod of leg 1 comprising 1 unilaterally pinnate and 6 pinnate setae. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + +FIG. 77. +Schẚzçprçctus mçllẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, caudal ramus; C, antennule; D, antenna; E, mandible; F, maxillule; G, maxilla; H, maxilliped. Scale bars: A, 0.2 mm; B-H, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 78. +Schẚzçprçctus mçllẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 2; C, leg 3; D, leg 4; E, leg 5. Scale bars: A-D, 0.05 mm; E, 0.2 mm. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-0VI7
Leg 20-01-0VI6
Leg 30-01-0VI4
Leg 40-00-0VI3
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 78E +) large, lamellate, subcircular, wider than long, 463×504 μm, with 1 seta at outer distal corner and 1 minute setal vestige on middle of distal margin. Leg 6 not seen. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The setation of the endopods of legs 2-4 characterizes +S +. +mçllẚs +sp. nov. +because the pattern of 6, 4, and 3 setae is unique within the genus ( +Table 3 +). +Schẚzçprçctus mçllẚs +sp. nov. +can be also distinguished from its congeners by the combination of a 3-segmented abdomen (shared only with +S +. +vestẚtus +and +S +. +trẚpartẚtus +sp. nov +.), the possession of 4 claws and 2 setae on the caudal ramus (compared to 4 claws and 1 seta in +S +. +vestẚtus +, and 5 claws and 1 seta in +S +. +trẚpartẚtus +sp. nov. +), and by having 2 setae on leg 5 (compared to 1 seta in +S +. +vestẚtus +and 4 setae in +S +. +trẚpartẚtus +sp. nov. +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF97FF82FA93FD09D0B41DA7.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF97FF82FA93FD09D0B41DA7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3993024208c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF97FF82FA93FD09D0B41DA7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Schizoproctus frigidus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 73 +, +74 +) + + + + +Type material. +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1980, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +Cçrella antarctẚca +Sluiter, 1905; Antarctic Ocean, Eltanin cruise 12, Stn 1078 ( +61°26´S +, +41°55.4´W +), depth +604 m +, +12 April 1964 +. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from the Latin +frẚg +(cold), referring to its discovery in Antarctic waters. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 73A +) robust, +2.88 mm +long. Anterior part of body unsegmented and inflated; cephalosome defined from metasome by faint dorsal constriction. Posterior part of body ( +Fig. 73B +) consisting of genital somite and 4-segmented abdomen. Genital somite much wider than long (205×487 μm) incompletely ar- ticulated from first abdominal somite. First and second abdominal somites 354×436 and 230×385 μm, respectively; third and fourth abdominal somites indistinctly articulated from each other, 128×297 and 210×270 μm, respectively. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 73C +) about 107×135 μm, armed with 4 claws and 2 setae; lengths of claws 58, 76, 50, and 25 μm from inner to outer. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 73D +) broad, steeply tapering towards nipple-shaped, semicircular apex. Antennule ( +Fig. 73E +) 252 μm long and indistinctly 5-segmented; first segment broad, forming right angle with distal 4 segments; 2 distal articulations incomplete; armature formula 11, 6, 3, 2, and 8+aesthetasc. Left antenna ( +Fig. 73F +) consisting of unarmed coxa, basis and unsegmented endopod; endopod 163× 65 μm, armed with 8 short setae and with rudimentary suture line subdistally defining proximal 3-setae part and distal 5-setae part; longest distal seta 96 μm. Right an- tenna segmented and armed as left antenna; endopod ( +Fig. 73G +) 167×65 μm, subdivided by subdistal sclerotization band. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 73H +) much broader than long, with large, soft posteromedian protuberance. Mandible ( +Fig. 73I +) as usual for genus, with 3 teeth on coxal gnathobase and 9 setae on palp. Maxillule ( +Fig. 73J +) with 8 setae on arthrite, distal seta rudimentary; palp unsegmented with vestigial seta representing epipodite, 2 setae on medial margin, 3 setae on outer margin, 1 tubercle distally, and 3 setae on endopod; endopod fused with basis. Maxilla ( +Fig. 74A +) 2-segmented with 2 setae on first segment and 7 setae on second. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 74B +) robust, 4-segmented, but second endopodal segment completely fused with terminal claw; syncoxa broadening distally; basis much wider than long, bearing 2 setae; first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment + terminal claw complex unarmed, with 1 minute papilla at proximal third. + + +Legs 1-4 biramous with 1-segmented rami; coxa unarmed; basis with small outer seta. Legs 1 ( +Fig. 74C +) and 2 with same armature. Legs 3 ( +Fig. 74D +) and 4 also with same armature. Outer spines on exopods gradually becoming longer from proximal to distal; longest distal spine shorter than width of exopodal segment. Endopods distinctly tapering. Two anterior (ventral) setae on endopod of legs 3 and 4 naked. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Legs 1 & 20-01-0VII8
Legs 3 & 40-01-0VII7
+ + + +FIG. 73. +Schẚzçprçctus frẚgẚdus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, left; B, posterior part of body, dorsal; C, caudal ramus; D, rostrum; E, antennule; F, left antenna; G, distal part of right antenna; H, labrum; I, mandible; J, maxillule; K, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, 0.5 mm; B, 0.2 mm; C, E, J, K, 0.05 mm; D, F-I, 0.1 mm. + + + + +FIG. 74. +Schẚzçprçctus frẚgẚdus +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilla; B, maxilliped; C, leg 1; D, leg 3; E, leg 5. Scale bars: A-D, 0.1 mm; E, 0.5 mm. + + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 74E +) circular, fleshy, lamellate, 100×92 μm, with 1 rudimentary seta distally. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 73K +) repre- sented by 2 small spinules and 1 spiniform process on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The most distinctive diagnostic feature of +S +. +frẚgẚdus +sp. nov. +is the presence of 7 spines on the exopods of legs 1-4, because in other species of the genus the maximum number of spines on the exopod of any leg is 6, although several species bear an additional rudimentary seta on the exopod. The armature sequence on the endopods of legs 1-4 (8-8-7-7) is also an outstanding diagnostic feature shared only with +SK bẚsetatus +sp. nov. +( +Table 3 +), which differs from +S +. +frẚgẚdus +sp. nov. +in the presence of 2 setae on the lamellate exopod of leg 5. The fusion of the second endopodal segment and the terminal claw of the maxilliped of +S +. +frẚgẚdus +sp. nov. +is an unusual feature within the genus, which is only known in +S +. +ẚnflatus +, as figured by +Sars (1921) +and +S. fusiformis + +sp. nov. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF98FF75FA93FF11D19B1947.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF98FF75FA93FF11D19B1947.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d8514d9d5d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF98FF75FA93FF11D19B1947.xml @@ -0,0 +1,456 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Schizoproctus pinguis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 81-84 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1984), +1 ♀ +, and +2 ♂♂ +intact +paratypes +(MNHN-IU-2018-1985) and +1 ♀ +, +1 ♂ +paratypes +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17379) from + +Apl +ẚdẚum hẚans + +( +Monniot F. +& Gail), 1978 (MNHN- IT-2008-445 = +MNHN +A1 +/ +SID +.B/16); +East Kerguelen Is. +, +MD04 +-BENTHOS cruise, +R +. +V +. “Marion Dufresne”, +Stn CP +13 ( +49°32-33’S +, +70°57’E +), depth + +149-155 m + +, +Boury-Esnault +coll., + +22 February 1975 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is derived from the Latin +pẚngu +meaning “stout” and refers to the stout body of the female. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 81A +) stout, consisting of broader anterior and narrower posterior parts; body length +1.31 mm +and maximum width 464 μm. Anterior part of body unsegmented, with parallel lateral margins and rounded anterior margin, showing vestiges of suture lines on dorsal surface. Fourth and fifth pedigerous somites not defined from each other; legs 4 and 5 positioned in same transverse plane. Posterior part of body ( +Fig. 81B +) distinctly 5-segmented, consisting of genital and 4 abdominal somites. Genital somite about 110×243 μm; genital apertures large, positioned dorsally. Four abdominal somites 68×186, 57×166, 57×157, and 159×141 μm, respec- tively. Caudal rami divergent; each ramus ( +Fig. 81C +) 77×50 μm, armed with 4 claws and 2 setae; lengths of claws 59, 54, 29, and 26 μm, respectively, from inner to outer. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 81D +) small, semicircular, with 2 patches of spinules on ventral surface. Antennule ( +Fig. 81E +) 5- segmented; first segment expanded, comprising about half length of entire limb; articulation between two terminal segments indistinct; armature formula 13, 4, 3, 4, and 7+aesthetasc. Antenna ( +Fig. 81F +) 4-segmented; coxa, basis, and first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment 3.3 times longer than wide (100×30 μm), slightly longer than basis; armed with 8 armature elements (6 spines and 2 setae), spines shorter than width of segment; 2 setae (2 outer elements on distal margin) 52 μm long (outermost) and 86 μm. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 81G +) strongly tapering towards rounded posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 81H +) with 3 teeth on medial margin of coxal gnathobase; palp with 9 setae, as usual for genus. Maxillule ( +Fig. 81I +) with 7 setae (third distal seta minute) on precoxal arthrite, 1 small seta representing coxal epipodite, 2 medial and 3 outer setae on basis, and 3 setae on endopod. Maxilla ( +Fig. 81J +) 2-segmented; proximal segment with 2 large setae; distal segment with 6 setae, second distal seta vestigial. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 82A +) robust, 4-segmented; syncoxa and basis each with 2 setae; first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment with 2 small setae subdistally; terminal claw bearing 2 denticles proximally and 2 subdistally. + + +Legs 1-3 ( +Figs. 82 +B-D) and leg 4 biramous with unsegmented rami. Leg 1 with defined coxa and basis, but protopod of legs 2-4 not segmented. Exopods and endopods subequal in length. Exopods each armed with 5 spines. All setae on endopods naked. Legs 3 and 4 with same structure. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
ProtopodExopodEndopod
Leg 11-0V8
Leg 21-0V3
Legs 3 & 41-0V2
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig 82E +) inserted into dorsal surface of body, lamellate, wider than long (239×333 μm), armed with 4 small setae, 2 (1 thick and 1 slender) positioned close to each other on ventrodistal margin. Leg 6 represented by 2 spinules on genital operculum. + + +Description of male. +Body ( +Fig. 83A +) narrow, distinctly segmented, consisting of well-defined prosome and urosome: body length 797 μm and maximum width 249 μm. Prosome 497 μm long, consisting of cephalothorax and 3 free pedigerous somites. Cephalothorax 278 μm long, with dorsal suture line between cephalosome and first pedigerous somite. Urosome ( +Fig. 83B +) 5-segmented; fifth pedigerous somite 79 μm wide; genital somite 90×89 μm, with well-developed genital opercula. Three abdominal somites 38×58, 27×50, and 73×44 μm, respectively; anal somite with row of minute spinules on ventral surface near base of caudal rami. Caudal ramus 2.6 times longer than wide (52×20 μm); setation uncertain due to damage. + + +Rostrum narrower than that of female. Antennule ( +Fig. 83C +) 4-segmented; first segment with 5 setae and numerous (more than 130) aesthetascs; second segment with 15 setae or aesthetascs (setae difficult to distinguish from aesthetascs); third segment with 3 setae and 1 broad aesthetasc; terminal segment with 6 setae and 4 aesthetascs (including 2 broad ones). Antenna as in female. + + + +FIG. 81. +Schẚzçprçctus pẚnguẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, posterior part of body, dorsal; C, caudal ramus; D, rostrum; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum; H, mandible; I, maxillule; J, maxilla. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C, D, I, 0.02 mm; E-H, J, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 82. +Schẚzçprçctus pẚnguẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilliped; B, leg 1; C, leg 2; D, leg 3; E, leg 5. Scale bars: A-D, 0.05 mm; E, 0.1 mm. + + + +Labrum missing. Mouthparts extremely small, feeble and transparent. Mandible ( +Fig. 83D +) consisting of coxa and palp; coxa small, stellate, bearing 3 teeth and several minute spinules; palp elongate, trifurcate (or with 3 setae) distally. Maxillule ( +Fig. 83E +) bilobed; longer lobe tipped with 2 setae and shorter lobe with 3 setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 83F +) unequally bilobate, with short tapering lobe and elongated lobe bearing 4 setae and seta-like distal part. Maxilliped as in female but more slender. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 83G, H +, +84A, B +) biramous with well-defined coxa and basis. Legs 1 and 2 with unarmed coxa, but coxa of legs 3 and 4 each with inner seta. Basis of legs 1-4 with small outer seta. Exopods 3-segmented in legs 1-4, distinctly longer than endopods. Endopods incompletely 2-segmented (articulation only on posterior surface) in leg 1, 3-segmented in legs 2 and 3, and 2-segmented in leg 4. Distal segment of leg 1 endopod with 2 minute, hardly visible setae. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-0I-0; I-1; III, I, 40-1; 2
Leg 20-01-0I-0; I-1; III, I, 50-1; 0-2; I, 3
Leg 30-11-0I-0; I-1; III, I, 50-1; 0-2; I, 2
Leg 40-11-0I-0; I-1; III, I, 50-1; I, 4
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 83B +) consisting of outer seta on fifth pedigerous somite and small, free exopodal segment bearing + + +2 setae distally. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 83B +) represented by 2 setae on genital operculum + + + + +FIG. 83. +Schẚzçprçctus pẚnguẚs +sp. nov. +, male. A, habitus, dorsal; B, urosome, ventral; C, antennule; D, mandible; E, maxillule; F, maxilla; G, leg 1; H, leg 2. Scale bars: A, 0.1 mm; B, G, H, 0.05 mm; C, D, F, 0.02 mm; E, 0.1 mm. + + + + +FIG. 84. +Schẚzçprçctus pẚnguẚs +sp. nov. +, male. A, leg 3; B, leg 4. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. + + + + +Remarks. +Schẚzçprçctus pẚnguẚs +sp. nov. +resembles +S +. +fẚjẚensẚs +sp. nov. +in sharing the same armature formula (8, 3, 2, and 2) for the endopods of legs 1-4 but differs from the latter in many other respects. For example, the coxal gnathobase of the mandible of +S +. +pẚnguẚs +sp. nov. +is not specialized as in +S +. +fẚjẚensẚs +sp. nov. +, the exopods of legs 1-4 are armed with 5 spines (cf. 6 spines in +S +. +fẚjẚensẚs +sp. nov. +), and leg 5 is wider than long (cf. longer than wide in +S +. +fẚjẚensẚs +sp. nov. +). + + +Schẚzçprçctus pẚnguẚs +sp. nov. +shares some character states with +S +. +vestẚtus +, such as the setation of the exopods of legs 1-4, which bear 5 spines in both species. However, +SK vestẚtus +differs from +S +. +pẚnguẚs +sp. nov. +in having a larger body, +7 mm +long according to +Aurivillius (1885) +or +6.1 mm +according to +Sars (1921) +, a 5-segmented abdomen, and in being armed with spines on the endopods of legs 1, 2, and 4 (leg 3 is unknown). + + +Numerous diatom frustules were observed in the gut of the examined female specimens of +S +. +pẚnguẚs +sp. nov. +The atrophied mouthparts of the male suggest that the adult is a non-feeding stage. + + + +Genus + +Haplostomides +Chatton & Harant, 1924 + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Female: Body vermiform, unsegmented or incompletely segmented, indistinctly divisible into cephalosome, metasome, and genitoabdomen. Caudal rami usually fused with abdomen, armed with 1 terminal spine and 1 to 4 setae. Rostrum weakly developed. Antennule small, 1- to 5-segmented. Antenna 2- or 3-segmented; terminal segment (endopod) armed with 2 to 4 spines. Labrum simple. Mandible 1- or 2-segmented, with 2 or 3 setae on distal segment, rarely with 1 seta on proximal segment; mandible with rudimentary gnathobase in some species. Maxillule typically 2-segmented, consisting of precoxa and palp, bearing 2 to 5 setae on medial margin of precoxa and 4 to 6 setae on palp. Maxilla as small lobe bearing 2 to 4 setae. Maxilliped consisting of coxa, basis, and 2- segmented endopod plus small terminal claw. Legs 1-4 consisting of unsegmented protopod, exopod, and endopod. Protopods with or without outer margin seta. Exopods with 1 seta and 2 to 5 spines; 2 distal spines occasionally fused at base to form bifurcate spine. Endopods lobate, unarmed, sometimes vestigial. Leg 5 reduced to small lobe bearing 2 to 4 setae. + + +Male +(based on +eaplçstçmẚdes scçttẚ +Chatton & Harant, 1924): Body cyclopiform, distinctly segmented, consisting of cephalosome, 4-segmented metasome, and 6-segmented urosome. Caudal ramus with 5 setae. Antennule 4-segmented, with numerous aesthetascs on first segment. Antenna 3-segmented, similar to that of female. Mandible, maxillule, and maxilla degenerated. Maxilliped similar to that of female. Legs 1-4 biramous. Leg 1 with 3-segmented exopod and transformed 1-segmented endopod. Legs 2 and 3 with 3-segmented rami. Leg 4 with 3- segmented exopod and 2-segmented endopod. Inner coxal seta absent in legs 1 and 2, but present in legs 3 and 4. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-0I-0; I-0; III, I, 4II, 6
Leg 20-01-0I-0; I-1; II, I, 50-1; 0-2; 0, II, 3
Leg 30-11-0I-0; I-1; II, I, 50-1; 0-2; 0, II, 2
Leg 40-11-0I-0; I-1; II, I, 50-1; 0, II, 3
+ +Leg 5 consisting of obscure protopod bearing 1 seta and free exopodal segment bearing 2 setae. Leg 6 represented by 2 setae on distal margin of genital operculum. + + + + +Type +species. + +eaplçstçmẚdes scçttẚ +Chatton & Harant, 1924, by original designation. + + + + +Remarks. +Marchenkov & Boxshall (2003) +mentioned that species of +eaplçstçmẚdes +differ from one another in details of the antennae, mandibles, maxillules and maxillae, and other limbs have little taxonomic value at the species level. Key character states of the ten known and the three new species described below are summarized in +Table 4 +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF9FFF8CFA93FF10D5251D8B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF9FFF8CFA93FF10D5251D8B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b8c028ed720 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFF9FFF8CFA93FF10D5251D8B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,229 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Schizoproctus fijiensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 79 +, +80 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1983, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +Culeçlus recumbens +Herdman +, 1881 (MNHN-IT-2008-2479 = +MNHN +S2 +/ +CUL/47 +); + +Ride +de Lau + +, +Fiji +, BORDAU 1 cruise, +RV +“Alis”, +Stn CP +1415 ( +16°31´S +, +179°00´W +), depth + +670-682 m + +, +Bouchet +, +Warén +& Richer-IRD coll., + +27 February 1999 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the +type +locality provides the name of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 79A +) dorsoventrally flattened, consisting of broader anterior and narrower posterior parts, with weak exoskeleton. Body length +1.69 mm +and maximum width 625 μm across cephalosome. Anterior part distinctly 5-segmented; fifth pedigerous somite completely fused with fourth pedigerous somite. Posterior part of body consisting of genital somite and 4-segmented abdomen. Genital somite much wider than long. Anal somite about 1.4 times longer than wide, twice as long as third abdominal somite. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 79B +) about 1.3 times longer than wide (81×62 μm), armed with 4 claws and 1 seta, and ornamented with fine spinules ventrally on inner distal surface; lengths of 4 claws 73, 64, 59, and 35 μm from inner to outer, respectively,. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 79C +) much wider than long, with rounded apex and ornamented distally with minute spinules on lateral margins. Antennule ( +Fig. 79D +) strongly tapering, 5-segmented, but articulation between first and second segments indistinct; armature formula 12, 5, 2, 3, and 8. Left antenna ( +Fig. 79E +) 4-segmented; proximal 3 segments unarmed; terminal segment (second endopodal segment) as long as basis, armed with 8 spines; 3 proximal inner spines as long as segment width; fourth inner spine smallest; second outer spine on distal margin longest, 89 μm long. Terminal segment of right antenna ( +Fig. 79F +) as long as that of left antenna, but armed with 7 spines (lacking small fourth inner spine of left antenna); longest second outer spine on distal margin 86 μm long. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 79G +) weak, flexible, subdivided into wider proximal and thin-walled, semicircular distal parts, with weak dorsal protuberance in middle. Mandible ( +Fig. 79H +) consisting of coxa and palp: coxal gnathobase ( +Fig. 79I +) specialized, with medial margin bearing 9 teeth; distalmost tooth elongate, close to second tooth, thin, bearing fine spinules along proximal margin; second and third distal teeth strong, widely separated from each other; proximal 6 teeth smaller, finely bifid at tip; palp armed with 9 setae arranged as 3, 2, 2, and 2. Maxillule ( +Fig. 79J +) with 8 distinct setae on precoxal arthrite, 1 small seta representing coxal epipodite, 5 setae (2 inner and 3 outer) and prominent distal tubercle on basis, and 3 setae on endopod. Maxilla ( +Fig. 79K +) indistinctly 3-segmented, armed with 3, 3, and 4 setae on first to third segments, respectively; shortest seta on third segment spiniform. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 80A +) robust, consisting of syncoxa, basis, and 2-segmented endopod; syncoxa with 2 large setae on inner side; basis with 2 unequal setae; first endopodal segment short and unarmed; second endopodal segment bearing 2 small setae and 1 spinule; terminal claw completely fused with segment. + + +Legs 1-3 ( +Fig. 80 +B-D) and leg 4 biramous with unsegmented rami; coxa unarmed; basis with small outer seta. Endopods tapering, much smaller than exopods. Exopods of legs 1-4 each armed with 6 distinct spines. Leg 4 armed as in leg 3. All setae on endopods pinnate. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-0VI8
Leg 20-01-0VI3
Legs 3 & 40-01-0VI2
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 80E +) fleshy, lamellate, oval, 404×308 μm, with 2 small and 2 larger setae, 3 located distally and 1 on ventral margin. Leg 6 not observed due to damage to genital somite during dissection. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The medial, cutting margin of the coxal gnathobase of the mandible of +Schẚzçprçctus +typically bears 3 or 4 distal teeth and has a pectinate proximal part (carrying an array of fine spinules). In contrast, the medial margin of the coxal gnathobase of +S +. +fẚjẚensẚs +sp. nov. +is armed with 3 distal teeth and a proximal array of 6 bifid teeth. This specialized form of the coxal gnathobase has not been found previously within the family +Botryllophilidae +and thus serves to characterize +S +. +fẚjẚensẚs +sp. nov. +Additional diagnostic features of +S +. +fẚjẚensẚs +sp. nov. +include, (1) the endopods of legs 2-4 are tapering and much smaller than the exopods; (2) the numbers of setae on the endopods of legs 1-4 are 8, 3, 2, and 2, respectively, which is a unique combination within the genus; (3) leg 5 is elliptical; and (4) the two setae on the syncoxa (first segment) of the maxilliped are relatively large, half as long as the width of the syncoxa. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFA2FFBCFA93FF10D7271C6F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFA2FFBCFA93FF10D7271C6F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b27b0aa513a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFA2FFBCFA93FF10D7271C6F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus tuberculatus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 42-44 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1965), +♀ +paratype +(MNHN-IU-2018-1966), and +♀ +paratype +(dis- sected, MNHN-IU-2014-17371) from +mseudçdẚstçma delẚcatum +Monniot C. +, +Monniot F. +, +Griffiths +& +Schleyer +, 2001; +Sodwana Bay +, +South Africa +, +Schleyer +coll., 1993. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name refers to the presence of a pair of posteroventral tubercles on the fifth pedigerous somite. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 42A, B +) rather stout, slightly asymmetrical, +1.10 mm +long in largest dissected specimen. Anterior part of body gradually broadening posteriorly, with distinct cephalic shield and weak lateral constrictions. Fourth and fifth pedigerous somites not defined from each other; leg 5 positioned laterally. Fifth pedigerous somite bearing paired blunt tubercles posteroventrally (indicated by arrowhead in +Fig. 42 +A-C) on both sides Posterior part of body consisting of genital somite and 4 abdominal somites; 110×190, 75×135, 90×125, 77×113, and 140×98 μm, respectively. Genital somite with densely sclerotized region surrounding copulatory pore on ventral surface; genital apertures positioned dorsally. Anal somite about 1.4 times longer than wide. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 42D +) about 1.55 times longer than wide (51×33 μm), armed with 4 claws and 2 setae; second inner claw strongly curved, not articulated from ramus; 1 outer claw bluntly tipped, gradually broadening distally, with serrate, membranous cap at tip; 2 caudal setae unequal in length. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 42E +) short, 169 μm long, 4-segmented, but articulation between first and sec- ond segments distinct only on dorsal surface; armature formula 8, 5, 2+aesthetasc, and 11+aesthetasc; 3 larger setae on first, 2 on second, 1 on each of third and apical segments. Left antenna ( +Fig. 42F +) 4-segmented, slender, with unarmed coxa, basis, and first endopodal segment; second endopodal segment 3.4 times longer than wide (55×16 μm), shorter than basis, armed with 7 setae (4 of them shorter and bluntly tipped); longest of distal setae 95 μm long. Second endopodal segment of right antenna ( +Fig. 42G +) longer than that of left antenna, 64×14 μm, armed with 7 spiniform setae bearing blunt, serrate distal tips, all setae at most 50 μm long, shorter than second endopodal seg- ment. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 42H +) with thick lateral borders and linguiform posteromedian lobe ornamented with minute setules distally. Mandible ( +Fig. 42I +) bearing bifurcate distal tooth and 3 smaller, blunt teeth on coxal gnathobase; palp bearing blunt tubercle on medial margin and armed with 9 setae arranged as 3, 2, 2, and 2; distal of 3 proximal setae and 1 of subterminal setae naked. Maxillule ( +Fig. 42J +) with 6 distinct setae on precoxal arthrite; coxobasis with 2 setae on medial margin and 3 setae on outer margin, plus outer distal lobe; endopod well-defined from basis, armed with 3 setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 43A +) indistinctly 3-segmented and armed with 2, 4, and 3 setae on first to third segments, respectively; one of 4 setae on second segment very small. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 43B +) robust, 4-segmented; syncoxa much broader than long, with 2 minute setae on medial margin; basis with 2 minute setae; short first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment with 2 minute setae (1 subdistal and 1 distal); terminal claw obscurely articulated from second endopodal segment, bearing 2 denticles on inner margin (1 proximal and 1 subdistal). + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 43 +C-F, 44A-D) biramous, asymmetrical; coxa unarmed; basis with 1 outer seta. Exopods of legs 1-4 unsegmented. Endopod of right leg 1 segmented only on posterior surface. Endopod of left leg 1 unsegmented. Endopods 2-segmented in right and left legs 2-4. Second endopodal segment of right leg 3 with 2 spines and 3 setae ( +Fig. 44A +). Second endopodal segment of left leg 3 with 1 spine and 4 setae. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on right and left legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1VII868
Leg 2VI1; 751; 7
Leg 3VI1; II+351; I+4
Leg 4V1; 541; 5
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 43G +) small, positioned laterally on fifth pedigerous somite, strongly tapering, 113×63 μm, armed with 4 setae (1 on proximal dorsal margin and 3 distal); distal longest seta 100 μm long, slightly shorter than seg- ment. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 44E +) represented by 1 small spine and 1 spiniform process on genital operculum; about 9 small surface tubercles present near leg 6. + + + +FIG. 42. +Bçtryllçphẚlus tuberculatus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, posterior part of body, dorsal; D, caudal ramus; E, antennule; F, left antenna; G, second endopodal segment of right antenna; H, labrum; I, mandible; J, maxillule. Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm; D, F-J, 0.02 mm; E, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 43. +Bçtryllçphẚlus tuberculatus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, maxilla; B, maxilliped; C, right leg 1; D, left leg 1; E, right leg 2; F, left leg 2; G, leg 5. Scale bars: A-F, 0.02 mm; G, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 44. +Bçtryllçphẚlus tuberculatus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, right leg 3; B, left leg 3; C, right leg 4; D, left leg 4; E, leg 6. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Bçtryllçphẚlus tuberculatus + +sp. nov. + +most closely resembles +B +. +dẚstẚnctus +Ooishi, 2012 +known as an associate of +budẚstçma +sp. in +Madagascar +. They have the same number of armature elements on the antenna and on legs 1-4 and have similar setation on the antennule. Distinguishing the new species from +B +. +dẚstẚnctus +is easy: + +B +. +tuberculatus + + +sp. nov. + +possesses a pair of tubercles in the posteroventral region of the fifth pedigerous somite (vs. no such tubercles present in +B +. +dẚstẚnctus +), the exopod of right leg 3 is unsegmented (vs. 2-segmented in +B +. +dẚstẚnctus +), the exopod of left leg 4 is short and unsegmented (vs. elongate and 2-segmented in +B +. +dẚstẚnctus +), and the second endopodal segment of left leg 3 is armed with 1 spine plus 4 setae (vs. 5 setae only in +B +. +dẚstẚnctus +). The differences are sufficient to justify the establishment of a new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFA3FFB1FA93FA0CD1671A08.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFA3FFB1FA93FA0CD1671A08.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e96f9854475 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFA3FFB1FA93FA0CD1671A08.xml @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus kozloffi +Ooishi, 2014 + + + + + + + +Material examined. + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1963) in + +Clavel +ẚna lepadẚfçrmẚs + +( +Müller +, 1776), +Île Grande +, +Atlantic +coast of +France + +; + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-17370, dissected) in + +Cystçdytes +senegalense + +Monniot F. +, 1969, +Dakar +, +Senegal + +; + +3 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1964, +1 ♀ +dissected) in + +Cystçdytes +rçseçlus + +Hartmeyer +, 1912 (MNHN-IT-2008-2602 = +MNHN +A3 +/ +CYS/4 +), +Dakar +, +Senegal + + +Stn. +17, +IFAN +coll., + +21 January 1941 + + +. + + + + +Remarks. +Ooishi (2014c) +described this species based on specimens associated with +Clavelẚna lepadẚfçrmẚs +collected from the Atlantic coast of +France +. +Cystçdytes senegalense +and +C +. +rçseçlus +reported above are new host records. Almost all morphological features of our new material agree well with the original description, except for the absence of a pair of setulose lobes on the anteromedial margin of the first endopodal segment of right and left leg 1, which were described and figured in the original description. + + +This species is very similar to +B +. +neapçlẚtanus +Ooishi, 2006 +. Both have the same setation pattern on the antenna and the swimming legs. +Ooishi (2014c) +listed several differences between the two species, the most easily observed of which appears to be leg 5, which is short and stout in +B +. +kçzlçffẚ +but longer and tapering in +B +. +neapçlẚtanus +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFA6FFB1FA93FF10D51C1848.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFA6FFB1FA93FF10D51C1848.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a6012f1c3b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFA6FFB1FA93FF10D51C1848.xml @@ -0,0 +1,307 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus norvegicus +Schellenberg, 1921 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 39-41 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-17369, dissected and figured) in +mçlycarpa pẚgmentata +( +Herdman +, 1906) (MNHN-IT-2008-6635 = +MNHN +S1 +/ +POL +.B/405); +Boiboiwaga Island +, +Papua New Guinea + +, + +OCDN 5782 +- +T +( +10°12.26’S +, +150°44.75’E +), depth + +20 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +27 May 2008 + + +; + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1961) in +mçlycarpa +sp., +Mediterranean +coast of +Israel + +; + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1962) in +aendrçdça +sp., +Grand Rivière +, +Atlantic +coast of +Canada + +. + + + +Supplementary description based on female from +Papua New Guinea + +. Body ( +Fig. 39A +) T-shaped in lateral view, +4.05 mm +long in dissected specimen. Broader anterior part of body unsegmented, extremely swollen posterodorsally. Narrower posterior part of body ( +Fig. 39B +) consisting of genital and 4 abdominal somites; genital somite 464×709 μm, with broad tubercle in middle of dorsal surface; genital apertures positioned dorsally. Four abdominal somites gradually narrowing posteriorly. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 39C +) 267×127 μm, armed with 4 straight, blunt claws and 2 small setae; claws unequal in length, longest claw 152 μm, and second longest claw 70 μm long. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 39D +) 4-segmented with indistinct articulation between last 2 segments; armature formula 12, 3, 4, and 8; 7 setae on first segment very large, exceeding length of antennule. Antenna consisting of coxa, basis, and 1-segmented endopod; endopod armed with 5 rod-shaped spines on right antenna, but with 5 slender setae on left antenna ( +Fig. 39E +) (2 on inner margin and 3 on distal margin). + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 39F +) with broad posteromedial lobe and 4 patches of minute spinules along medial surface. Mandible with broadened coxal gnathobase ( +Fig. 39G +) bearing bifurcate distal tooth and 5 small, blunt denticles on medial margin; palp ( +Fig. 39H +) armed with 8 setae arranged as 3, 1, and 4. Maxillule ( +Fig. 39I +) with precoxal arthrite bearing 7 setae including 1 minute seta; palp with 2 setae on medial margin and 3 setae on outer margin of basis region, 1 seta on epipodite; endopod fused with basis, armed with 3 setae on distal margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 40A +) obscurely segmented, with 11 setae (including 4 small and naked). Maxilliped ( +Fig. 40B +) robust, 4-segmented; syncoxa as long as wide, with protruded outer margin, 2 minute setae on proximal inner margin, and patch of minute spinules at subdistal inner margin; basis with 2 minute inner distal setae; first endopodal segment shorter than wide, unarmed; second endopodal segment with 1 minute seta near middle; terminal claw small, about half as long as second endopodal segment. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 40-G +, +41 +A-C) with 1-segmented exopods and 2-segmented endopods; coxa lacking inner seta; basis with small outer seta. Exopod of right leg 1 ( +Fig. 40C +) with 1 inner subdistal seta, in addition to 6 spines. First endopodal segment of right and left leg 1 bearing setulose tubercle on anteromedial surface. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on rami of legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1VI+11; 771; 7
Leg 2VI1; 771; 7
Leg 3VI1; 561; 5
Leg 4VII1; 561; 5
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 40H +) elongate, gradually narrowing distally, with dorsolaterally curved distal part and blunt tip: armed with 4 setae; largest subdistal seta as long as proximal width of leg, other 3 setae minute. Leg 6 represented by 2 small spinules and 1 spiniform process on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Bçtryllçphẚlus nçrvegẚcus +is known to be widely distributed in the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans ( +Dudley +& Illg, 1991). In the present study its known distribution is extended to include the Mediterranean Sea and the tropical West Pacific. +Ooishi (1996) +redescribed this species based on a single female collected in +Scotland +and mentioned that this species is distinguishable from other “ +type +A” species of the genus primarily by the humpshaped body and the presence of 5 spines on the antenna. Additional remarkable diagnostic features of this species are as follows: the caudal rami bear straight, rod-shaped claws, leg 5 is curved dorsolaterally, and the antennule bears extremely large setae on the first segment. + + + +FIG. 39. +Bçtryllçphẚlus nçrvegẚcus +Schellenberg, 1921, female. A, habitus, right; B, legs 5 and posterior part of body, dorsal; C, caudal ramus; D, antennule; E, left antenna; F, labrum; G, mandibular coxa; H, mandibular palp; I, maxillule. Scale bars: A, B, 0.5 mm; C-F, H, 0.1 mm; G, I, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 40. +Bçtryllçphẚlus nçrvegẚcus +Schellenberg, 1921, female. A, maxilla; B, maxilliped; C, right leg 1; D, left leg 1; E, right leg 2; F, left leg 2; G, right leg 3; H, leg 5. Scale bars: A, 0.05 mm; B-H, 0.1 mm. + + + + +FIG. 41. +Bçtryllçphẚlus nçrvegẚcus +Schellenberg, 1921, female. A, left leg 3; B, right leg 4; C, left leg 4. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. + + + + +It is noticeable that +B +. +nçrvegẚcus +displays variation in the setation pattern of the antenna and of the exopods of right leg 1 and right leg 4, as follows: (1) the right antenna is always armed with 5 spines, but left antenna may be armed with 5 spines as in +Ooishi’s (1996) +specimen and our specimen from the Atlantic coast of +Canada +, or may be armed with 5 setae as in +2 specimens +each collected in +Papua New Guinea +and off the +Mediterranean +coast of +Israel +; (2) the exopod of the right leg 4 may be armed with 6 spines as in +Ooishi’s +specimen and our specimen from the +Atlantic +coast of +Canada +, or it may be armed with 7 spines as in our specimens from +Papua New Guinea +and off the +Mediterranean +coast of +Israel +; and (3) the exopod of right leg 1 may be armed with 6 spines plus 1 seta, as in +Ooishi’s +specimen and all of our specimens, but +Dudley +& +Illg +(1991) figured the exopod as bearing 7 spines ( +Dudley +& +Illg +, 1991: +Fig. 27 +). +The +material available for study was limited so the exact nature of this variation cannot yet be determined + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFAAFFA4FA93FD68D0841958.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFAAFFA4FA93FD68D0841958.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9fba43546a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFAAFFA4FA93FD68D0841958.xml @@ -0,0 +1,269 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus longicaudatus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 48-50 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1969, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +Sẚgẚllẚna +sp.; + +Juan +de Fuca + +, MUA 88, +Juan de Nova Is. +, +Mozambique +Channel, +Laboute +coll., + +02 February 1996 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is a combination of Latin +lçngus +(=long) and +cauda +(=tail), referring to the relatively long abdomen of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 48A +) consisting of swollen anterior part and elongate posterior part, with thick exoskeleton; body length +1.45 mm +. Anterior part of body expanded dorsally and laterally, with slightly depressed cephalosome and 3 dorsolateral constrictions, without division between fourth and fifth pedigerous somites. Leg 5 positioned laterally. Posterior part of body ( +Fig. 48B +) as long as anterior part; consisting of genital and 4 abdominal somites. Genital somite 148×255 μm; genital apertures large, located dorsally. Four abdominal somites 138×175, 154×157, 151×138, and 200×126 μm, respectively. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 48C +) short, 51×46 μm, armed with 4 claws and 2 small setae; inner largest claw 92 μm long, much longer than ramus; 2 outer distal claws comprising blunt straight claw (60 μm long) tipped with 1 small setule, and strongly curved short claw (41 μm long). + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 48D +) 187 μm long, not expanded, 5-segmented; articulation between 2 termi- nal segments incomplete, expressed only on one surface; armature formula 7, 5, 3, 4, and 8; first to third segments with 5, 3, and 1 large setae, respectively. Antenna ( +Fig. 48E, F +) slender, 4-segmented; coxa, basis, and first endopodal segment unarmed: second endopodal segment of left antenna about 4.3 times longer than wide (82×19 μm), armed with 2 inner and 4 distal, attenuate setae. Second endopodal segment of right antenna ( +Fig. 48F +) longer than that of left antenna, 115×18 μm; armed with longer, naked proximal seta and 5 shorter, spiniform setae ornamented with spinules distally. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 48G +) with broad posteromedian lobe bearing setules along posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 48H +) consisting of coxa and palp; medial margin of coxal gnathobase with bifurcate distal tooth and 4 or 5 smaller, blunt teeth; palp with semicircular tubercle on middle of medial margin and armed with 9 setae arranged as 3, 2, 2, and 2. Maxillule ( +Fig. 48I +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa with 6 distinct setae on arthrite; palp divisible into coxa, basis, and endopod; coxa with small, knob-like epipodite tipped with minute vestigial seta; basis with 2 medial and 3 outer setae and 1 tubercle-like distal process; endopod wider than long, incompletely articulated from basis, armed with 3 setae on distal margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 48J +) indistinctly 2-segmented with 3 setae on first segment and 6 setae on second, mediodistal seta strong, claw-like. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 49A +) 4-segmented; syncoxa with 2 small setae on medial margin and blunt tubercle at mediodistal corner; basis with 1 small seta; first endopodal segment small, unarmed; second segment with 2 minute setae and 1 inner distal, dentiform process; terminal claw as long as second endopodal segment, bearing small subterminal denticle. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 49 +B-G, 50A, B) biramous and asymmetrical, with unsegmented exopods and incompletely 2- segmented endopods (endopod of right leg 3 missing); coxa unarmed; basis with outer seta, but unornamented. First endopodal segment of all swimming legs bearing short seta; second endopodal segment of right leg 2 with 3 spines and 4 setae; endopods of legs 1 and 4 armed with setae only. Some of setae on endopods of legs 1 and 2 pinnate, other setae naked. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on right and left legs 1-4 as follows: + + + +FIG. 48. +Bçtryllçphẚlus lçngẚcaudatus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, left; B, posterior part of body, dorsal; C, caudal ramus; D, antennule; E, left antenna; F, endopod of right antenna; G, labrum; H, mandible; I, maxillule; J, maxilla. Scale bars: A, 0.2 mm; B, 0.1 mm; C-H, 0.05 mm; I, J, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 49. +Bçtryllçphẚlus lçngẚcaudatus +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilliped; B, right leg 1; C, left leg 1; D, right leg 2; E, left leg 2; F, exopod of right leg 3; G, left leg 3; H, leg 5; I, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, H, 0.05 mm; B-G, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 50. +Bçtryllçphẚlus lçngẚcaudatus +sp. nov. +, female. A, right leg 4; B, left leg 4. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1VII1; 761; 7
Leg 2VI1; III+451; 7
Leg 3VI(missing)51; 5
Leg 4V1; 551; 5
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 49H +) small, not extending beyond anterior border of genital somite, about 1.4 times longer than wide (117×86 μm) with rounded distal margin; armed with 3 thin shorter setae and 1 large distal seta, longer than leg 5. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 49I +) represented by 1 spinule and 1 spiniform process on genital operculum. Five small papillae present near leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +In having the same combination of armature elements on legs 1, 2 and 4 and on the exopod of right leg 3 (the endopod of right leg 3 is missing in the single available specimen of +B +. +lçngẚcaudatus +sp. nov. +), +B +. +lçngẚcaudatus +sp. nov. +is comparable only with +B +. +spẚnulçsus +Ooishi, 2012 +. The latter species lives in association with an ascidian of the genus +Synçẚcum +in +Madagascar +( +Ooishi, 2012 +). The main differences that serve to distinguish between +B +. +lçngẚcaudatus +sp. nov. +and +B +. +spẚnulçsus +are: (1) the anterior part of the body is swollen (cf. narrow in +B +. +spẚnulçsus +); (2) leg 5 is stout (cf. elongate in +B +. +spẚnulçsus +); (3) the first segment of the antennule is armed with 5 large and 2 small setae (cf. 2 large and 6 small setae in +B +. +spẚnulçsus +); (4) the second endopodal segment of right leg 2 is armed with 3 spines and 4 setae (cf. 3 naked and 4 pinnate setae in +B +. +spẚnulçsus +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFAEFFB8FA93FEE4D15F1FED.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFAEFFB8FA93FEE4D15F1FED.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..39c61d8ca6e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFAEFFB8FA93FEE4D15F1FED.xml @@ -0,0 +1,304 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus stenurosus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 45-47 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1967), +3 ♀♀ +paratypes +(intact, MNHN-IU-2018-1968), and +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17372) from +bxçstçma ẚanthẚnum +(Sluiter, 1909); +Papua New Guinea +, south coast near bootless inlet, +South Motupore +reef, +OCDN + +1643-I + +( +09°31.81’S +, +147°17.05’E +), depth + +3 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +29 October 1992 + +. + + + +Additional material. + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-17373, dissected) from +b +. +ẚanthẚnum +, +Papua New Guinea +, +CRRF +coll + +. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from the Greek +sten +(=narrow) and +urç +(=tail), referring to the slender abdomen of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 45A +) narrow, slightly asymmetrical, arched ventrally; body length +1.50 mm +. Anterior part of body gradually broadening posteriorly, unsegmented, but divisible into 5 parts by indistinct cephalic shield and 3 weak dorsolateral constrictions; fourth and fifth pedigerous somites not defined from each other. Leg 5 positioned dorsolaterally. Posterior part of body ( +Fig. 45B +) slender, occupying 45% of body length, consisting of genital somite and abdomen of 4 somites. Genital somite 152×242 μm, narrowing posteriorly; genital apertures positioned dorsally.Abdominal somites 121×167, 133×152, 127×145, and 172×123 μm, respectively. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 45C +) armed with 4 claws and 2 setae; larger inner distal claws longer than ramus; 1 inner distal claw blunt with membranous tip. Egg sac ( +Fig. 45D +) oval, 640×455 μm; each egg about 160 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 45E +) short, 4-segmented; armature formula 8, 5, 1+aesthetasc, and 10+aesthetasc; 2 larger setae on first, 2 on second, and 1 on third segments. Left antenna ( +Fig. 45F +) slender, 4-segmented; proximal 3 segments unarmed; second endopodal segment about 3.4 times longer than wide (79×23 μm), distinctly shorter than basis, armed with 7 bluntly tipped, slender setae, longest outer distal seta 128 μm. Second endopodal segment of right antenna ( +Fig. 45G +) about 4 times longer than wide (91×23 μm), longer than that of left antenna, but with shorter setae, longest second outer distal seta 83 μm. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 45H +) with thickened lateral borders and linguiform posteromedian lobe bearing small lobe on ventral surface and minute setules on distal margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 45I +) bearing bifurcate distal tooth and 3 smaller teeth on coxal gnathobase; palp with 9 setae arranged as 3, 2 (including 1 minute seta), 2, and 2; distal 2 of 3 outer proximal setae broadened. Maxillule ( +Fig. 45J +) with 6 distinct setae on precoxal arthrite; coxobasis with 1 vestigial seta on epipodite, 2 medial and 3 outer setae on basis region; setulose distal lobe present on basis; endopod distinctly articulated from basis, armed with 3 setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 45K +) indistinctly 3-segmented with 3, 4, and 3 setae on first to third segments, respectively. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 46A +) relatively narrow, 4-segmented; syncoxa as long as wide, with 2 small setae proximally and row of several spinules near middle of outer surface; basis with 2 small setae; small first endopodal segment unarmed; second segment twice as long as wide, with 1 small seta on inner margin and produced inner distal corner; terminal claw small, shorter than second endopodal segment. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 46 +B-E, 47A-D) biramous, asymmetrical; coxa obscure, lacking inner seta; basis with small outer seta, ornamented with patch of spinules at inner distal corner. Exopods of all swimming legs unsegmented, but all endopods distinctly 2-segmented. Second endopodal segment of right legs 2-4 bearing spines in addition to setae. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on right and left legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1VII1; 761; 7
Leg 2VI1; III+451; 6
Leg 3 Leg 4VI V1; II+3 1; II+35 41; 5 1; 5
+ + + +FIG. 45. +Bçtryllçphẚlus stenurçsus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, right; B, posterior part of body, dorsal; C, caudal ramus; D, egg sac; E, antennule; F, left antenna; G, distal part of right antenna; H, labrum; I, mandible; J, maxillule; K, maxilla. Scale bars: A, D, 0.2 mm; B, 0.1 mm; C, H-K, 0.02 mm; E, F, G, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 46. +Bçtryllçphẚlus stenurçsus +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilliped; B, right leg 1; B, left leg 1; D, right leg 2; E, left leg 2. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 47. +Bçtryllçphẚlus stenurçsus +sp. nov. +, female. A, right leg 3; B, left leg 3; C, right leg 4; D, left leg 4; E, leg 5. Scale bars: A-D, 0.05 mm; E, 0.1 mm. + + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 47E +) elongate, extending beyond posterior margin of genital somite ( +Fig. 45A +), 2.5 times longer than wide (380×150 μm); armed with 4 setae (3 thin, setule-like); largest distal seta 110 μm long, but shorter than proximal width of leg 5. Leg 6 represented by 1 small spinule and 1 spinule-like process on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Leg 5 is generally large in members of the +Bçtryllçphẚlus +type +B species group but small in members of the +type +A species group. +Bçtryllçphẚlus stenurçsus +sp. nov. +belongs to the +type +A group, but possesses a large leg 5 which seems to be the most salient diagnostic feature of the new species. Within the +type +A group, +B +. +abbçttẚ +Ooishi & Illg, 1989 and +B +. +banyulensẚs +Brément, 1909 carry a fairly large leg 5, but they differ from +B +. +stenurçsus +sp. nov. +in having different combinations of armature elements on the swimming legs. For example, +B +. +abbçttẚ +and +B +. +banyulensẚs +each have 6 spines (cf. 7 spines in +B +. +stenurçsus +sp. nov. +) on the exopod of right leg 1, and 7 setae (cf. 8 setae in +B +. +stenurçsus +sp. nov. +) on the endopod of right leg 2. + + +The combination of setal numbers (8-7-6-6) on the endopods of left legs 1-4 of +B +. +stenurçsus +sp. nov. +is unique within the genus and this feature alone serves to differentiate +B +. +stenurçsus +sp. nov. +from all of its congeners. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFB2FFACFA93FEE4D7441D8B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFB2FFACFA93FEE4D7441D8B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1869ad15327 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFB2FFACFA93FEE4D7441D8B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,312 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus angustus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 54-56 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1971) and +paratype +♀ +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17375) from +budẚstçma +sp.; +Mabul +, +Malaysia +, +OPHG 1067 +-S ( +04º14.51’N +, +118º37.32’E +), depth + +5-20 m + +, +CRRF +coll., + +16 January 2004 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is derived from the Latin +angust +(=narrow), indicating the narrow body. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 54A, B +) narrow, consisting of broader anterior and narrower posterior parts; body length +1.45 mm +, width +0.33 mm +. Cephalosome longer than wide. Anterior part of body gradually broadening posteriorly, unsegmented, but with 4 dorsal traces of articulations. Posterior part of body ( +Fig. 54C +) not articulated from anterior part, consisting of genital and 4 abdominal somites. Genital somite much wider than long, with complicated, densely sclerotized sculpture on ventral surface; genital apertures positioned dorsally. Four abdominal somites clearly defined, 112×154, 127×140, 119×127, and 135×110 μm, respectively. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 54D +) armed with 4 claws and 1 seta; 1 of 2 outer distal claws massive and blunt, other outer claw not articulated from ramus. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 54E +) 120 μm long, 4-segmented; first and second segments broadened; ar- mature formula 9 (3 large + 6 small), 4 (2 large + 2 small), 2 (1 large + 1 small), and 12. Left antenna ( +Fig. 54F +) 4-segmented; proximal 3 segments unarmed; terminal segment (second endopodal segment) about 2.7 times longer than wide (59×22 μm), armed with 7 bluntly tipped setae. Terminal segment of right antenna ( +Fig. 54G +) about 3.3 times longer than wide (69×21 μm), longer than that of left antenna; all setae distally capped with finely serrate membrane, 3 outer setae on distal margin shorter than those of left antenna. + + +Labrum weak, easily destroyed. Mandible ( +Fig. 54H +) consisting of coxa and palp; coxal gnathobase with 4 teeth including 2 distal acutely-pointed, longer teeth; palp with 9 setae arranged as 3, 2, 2, and 2. Maxillule ( +Fig. 54I +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa with 6 distinct setae on arthrite; palp divisible into coxa, basis, and endopod; coxa with 1 vestigial seta on epipodite; basis with 2 setae on medial margin, 3 setae on outer margin, and setulose lobe distally; endopod articulated from basis, distinctly wider than long, armed with 3 setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 55A +) indistinctly 3-segmented, armed with 3, 4 and 3 setae on first to third segments, respectively. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 55B +) 4-segmented; syncoxa with 2 small setae on inner margin; basis with 1 rudimentary seta on inner margin; first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment with 1 rudimentary seta on inner margin and 1 minute denticle at inner distal corner; terminal claw small, bearing minute subdistal denticle. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 55 +C-F, 56A-D) biramous, asymmetrical, with unsegmented exopods and 2-segmented endopods; coxa unarmed; basis with outer seta and row of spinules at inner distal corner. Second endopodal segment of right legs 2-4 with mix of spines and setae. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on right and left legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1VII1; 761; 7
Leg 2VI1; III+451; 7
Leg 3VI1; II+351; 5
Leg 4VI1; II+341; 5
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 56E, F +) small, about 1.4 times longer than wide (86×60 μm), strongly tapering, armed with 4 setae (1 proximal and 3 distal), distal longest seta 114 μm, distinctly longer than segment. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 55G +) represented by 1 spinule and 1 spiniform process on genital operculum; several dentiform elements on surface immediately adjacent to leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +FIG. 54. +Bçtryllçphẚlus angustus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, habitus, left; B, habitus, dorsal; C, posterior part of body, ventral; D, caudal ramus; E, antennule; F, left antenna; G, distal part of right antenna; H, mandible; I, maxillule. Scale bars: A, B, 0.2 mm; C, 0.1 mm; D-I, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 55. +Bçtryllçphẚlus angustus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, maxilla; B, maxilliped; C, right leg 1; D, left leg 1; E, right leg 2; F, left leg 2; G, genital aperture. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 56. +Bçtryllçphẚlus angustus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, right leg 3; B, left leg 3; C, right leg 4; D, left leg 4; E, F, leg 5. Scale bars: A-D, 0.02 mm; E, F, 0.05 mm. + + + + +Remarks. +The exopods of right legs 1-4 of + +B +. +angustus + + +sp. nov. + +are armed with 7, 6, 6, and 6 armature elements, respectively (the combination 7-6-6-6). This combination is common in members of the +type +B group (species with 5 or more annulations in the abdomen), but is very rare in members of the +type +A group, because the exopod of right leg +4 in +type +A usually bears 4 or 5 spines. In the +type +A group only two species, +B +. +nçrvegẚcus +and + +B +. +angustus + + +sp. nov. + +, deviate from this pattern, although in the former species the combination may be either 7-6-6-6 or 7-6-6-7. +Bçtryllçphẚlus nçrvegẚcus +does not require detailed comparison with + +B +. +angustus + + +sp. nov +. + +, because it carries distinctive features, such as the swollen metasome and the elongate and curved leg 5. + + +In +BK angustus + +sp. nov. + +the antenna is armed with 7 setae and leg 5 is very small. Both of these features are shared with three congeners, +B +. +dẚstẚnctus +, +B +. +mẚllarẚ +Ooishi, 2014, and + +B +. +tuberculatus + + +sp. nov. + +However, all three of these species bear 5 setae on the second endopodal segment of right leg 4, and differ from + +B +. +angustus + + +sp. nov. + +which has 2 spines and 3 setae on that segment of right leg 4. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFB6FFA0FA93FBFCD0A01C6F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFB6FFA0FA93FBFCD0A01C6F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3a825034b61 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFB6FFA0FA93FBFCD0A01C6F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,302 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus pentachaetus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 51-53 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2009-5057), +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(intact, MNHN-IU-2018-1970) and +♀ +para- type (dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17374) from +budẚstçma vẚrẚde +Tokioka +, 1955 (MNHN-IT-2008-4294 = +MNHN +A3 +/ +EUD/344 +); + +Danau A +Gam + +lake mangrove (marine lake), +Raja Ampat +, +West Papua +, +Indonesia +, +Stn +DAG 043 ( +00º26.518’N +, +130º41.134’E +), depth + +0.5 m + +, +F. Monniot +coll., + +23 November 2007 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is derived from the Greek +pent +(=five) and +chaet +(=a bristle), referring to the presence of five setae on the antenna. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 51A, B +) slightly asymmetrical, consisting of moderately swollen anterior part and narrower, cylindrical posterior part: body length +1.48 mm +in dissected largest specimen and +1.30 mm +in smallest specimen. Anterior part of body nearly elliptical, 860×468 μm, roundly expanded dorsally, unsegmented, without any constriction or trace of suture; dorsal cephalic shield distinct. Posterior part of body occupying 43% of total body length, consisting of genital somite and 4 abdominal somites. Genital somite 154×231 μm; genital apertures positioned dorsally. Four abdominal somites 115×173, 119×148, 104×135, and 135×115 μm, respectively. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 51C +) armed with 4 claws and 1 seta (lacking inner seta); 1 of outer distal claws blunt. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 51D +) 4-segmented; armature formula 13, 2+aesthetasc, 4, and 7+aesthetasc; first segment subdivided by incomplete suture line on one surface; setae on first segment comprising 5 large and 8 small ones. Right antenna ( +Fig. 51E +) 4-segmented, including obscure coxa; proximal 3 segments unarmed; second endopodal segment 3.6 times longer than wide (69×19 μm), characteristically armed with 5 setae, 1 on inner margin and 4 on distal margin. Left antenna different from right antenna in having shorter second endopodal segment and longer outer distal setae. + + +Labrum with broad posteromedian lobe. Mandible ( +Fig. 51F +) with coxal gnathobase ( +Fig. 51G +) bearing 3 teeth, distal tooth bifurcate; palp with 9 setae arranged as 3, 2, and 4. Maxillule ( +Fig. 51H +) consisting of precoxa and unsegmented palp; precoxal arthrite bearing 6 distinct setae; palp bearing 2 medial and 3 outer setae on basis region; endopod completely fused with basis, armed with 3 setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 51I +) indistinctly 3-segmented with 3 setae on each segment. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 51J +) 4-segmented; broad syncoxa unarmed; basis with 2 small setae; first endopodal segment unarmed; second segment with 1 small seta and 1 tooth-like process on inner margin; terminal claw simple, slightly shorter than second endopodal segment. + + + +FIG. 51. +Bçtryllçphẚlus pentachaetus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, habitus, right; B, habitus, dorsal; C, caudal ramus; D, antennule; E, right antenna; F, mandible; G, coxal gnathobase of mandible; H, maxillule; I, maxilla; J, maxilliped. Scale bars: A, B, 0.2 mm; C, D, G-I, 0.02 mm; E, F, J, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 52. +Bçtryllçphẚlus pentachaetus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, right leg 1; B, left leg 1; C, right leg 2; D, left leg 2; E, right leg 3; F, left leg 3; G, leg 5; H, genital aperture. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 53. +Bçtryllçphẚlus pentachaetus + +sp. nov. + +, female. A, right leg 4; B, left leg 4. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 52 +A-F, 53A, B) biramous, asymmetrical; with unsegmented exopods and 2-segmented endopods; coxa unarmed; basis with outer seta. Basis of leg 2-4 with patch of spinules at inner distal corner. First endopodal segment of right and left leg 1 bearing setulose tubercle on anterior surface (arrowed in +Figs. 52A and B +). One of setae on second endopodal segment of right and left leg 1 markedly smaller than other setae on same segment; second endopodal segment of right legs 2-4 with 1 spine in addition to setae. Outer subdistal seta on second endopodal segment of left legs 1-4 small, setule-like. Setal formula for right and left legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1VII1; 771; 7
Leg 2VI1; I+561; 6
Leg 3VI1; I+461; 5
Leg 4V1; I+451; 5
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 52G +) very small, lobate, slightly wider than long (54×60 μm), armed with 4 small setae (1 proximal and 3 distal) of subequal lengths. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 52H +) represented by 1 spinule and 1 spiniform process on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The most conspicuous diagnostic feature of + +B +. +pentachaetus + + +sp. nov. + +is the presence of only 5 setae on the antenna, this feature is shared only with +B +. +nçrvegẚcus +within the genus. +Bçtryllçphẚlus nçrvegẚcus +cannot be confused with + +B +. +pentachaetus + + +sp. nov. + +or any other species of +Bçtryllçphẚlus +as it displays unique features such as the extremely swollen metasome and the strongly curved leg 5. Another conspicuous feature of + +B +. +pentachaetus + + +sp. nov. + +is the small size of its leg 5, which is wider than long and comparable only with the smallest known leg 5, in +B +. +kçzlçffẚ +, which is 1.33 times longer than wide ( +Ooishi, 2014c +). The combination of the numbers of armature elements on the rami of legs 1-4 of + +B +. +pentachaetus + + +sp. nov. + +also is unique within the genus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFBBFF95FA93FB24D66618BA.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFBBFF95FA93FB24D66618BA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2d812f0bfb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFBBFF95FA93FB24D66618BA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,248 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus coniorhynchus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 60-62 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1973), +3 ♀♀ +paratypes +(intact, MNHN-IU-2018-1974), and +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17376) from +Aplẚdẚum falklandẚcum +Millar, 1960 (MNHN-IT-2008-386 = +MNHN +A1 +/ +APL +.B/532); Antarctic, Terre Adélie, CEAMARC cruise, +RV +“Aurore Australis”, Stn 18EV479 ( +66º10’S +, +139º41’E +), depth + +402-437 m + +, IPEV-AAD-MNHN coll., + +15 January 2008 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is derived from the Greek +cçnẚ +(= a cone) and +rhynch +(= a snout), and refers to the conical rostrum. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 60A, B +) asymmetrical, +1.15 mm +long. Anterior part of body comprising cephalosome to fifth pedigerous somite, +0.73 mm +long, invariably slightly curved to right side, unsegmented but with 4 weak constrictions dorsally and laterally; lateral margins parallel. Body width +0.33 mm +across middle of anterior part. Posterior part of body ( +Fig. 60C +) consisting of genital and 4 abdominal somites. Genital apertures positioned dorsally on genital somite. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 60D +) armed with 4 claws and 1 seta; 1 outer distal claw bluntly tipped, other claw not articulated with ramus. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 61A +) distinct, conical, longer than wide (57×42 μm). Antennule ( +Fig. 60E +) short, about 115 μm long, strongly tapering, with markedly broadened first and second segments; terminal segment subdivided on posterior side; armature formula 9 (3 large and 6 small), 5 (2 large and 3 small), 2 (1 large and 1 small), and 12. Left antenna ( +Fig. 60F +) apparently 5-segmented, consisting of coxa, basis, and 3-segmented endopod; proximal 3 segments unarmed; second endopodal segment (fourth segment) 46×18 μm, with 2 bluntly tipped setae on inner margin; third endopodal segment 17×16 μm, with 4 (2 shorter inner and 2 longer outer) bluntly tipped setae on distal margin. Right antenna similar in size and segmentation to left antenna; 2 setae on second endopodal segment and 2 inner distal setae on third endopodal segment slightly longer than those of left antenna and distally spinulose ( +Fig. 60G +); 2 outer distal setae distinctly shorter than those of left antenna. + + + +FIG. 60. +Bçtryllçphẚlus cçnẚçrhynchus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, left; C, posterior region of body, dorsal; D, caudal ramus; E, antennule; F, left antenna; G, distal part of right antenna; H, labrum; I, mandible. Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm; D-I, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 61. +Bçtryllçphẚlus cçnẚçrhynchus +sp. nov. +, female.A, rostrum; B, maxillule; C, maxilla; D, right leg 1; E, left leg 1; F, right leg 2; G, left leg 2. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 62. +Bçtryllçphẚlus cçnẚçrhynchus +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilliped; B, right leg 3; C, left leg 3; D, right leg 4; E, left leg 4; F, leg 5; G, genital aperture. Scale bars: A-E, G, 0.02 mm; F, 0.05 mm. + + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 60H +) with large, semicircular posteromedian lobe. Mandible ( +Fig. 60I +) with 1 bifurcate tooth and 2 shorter teeth on coxal gnathobase; palp with 2 lobes in middle of inner margin, armed with 9 setae arranged as 3, 2, 2, and 2. Maxillule ( +Fig. 61B +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa with 5 distinct setae on arthrite; palp 3-segmented, consisting of coxa, basis, and endopod; coxa unarmed (lacking seta of epipodite); basis with 2 setae on medial margin, 3 setae on outer margin, and setulose distal lobe; endopod articulated from basis, armed with 3 setae on distal margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 61C +) indistinctly 3-segmented and armed with 2, 4, and 3 setae on first to third segments, respectively. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 62A +) 4-segmented; syncoxa large, with 1 small seta proximally on inner margin and patch of spinules subdistally on inner side; basis with 2 small isolated setae; short first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment with 2 small setules and 1 pointed inner distal process; terminal claw small, about half as long as second endopodal segment. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 61 +D-G, 62B-E) biramous, with 1-segmented exopods and 2-segmented endopods; coxa unarmed; basis with 1 seta on outer margin. Basis of legs 1-3 with 1 prominent, spiniform process at inner distal corner and 2 to 4 spinules on distal margin near base of endopod; basis of leg 4 with 2 patches of several spinules at each inner distal corner and on distal margin. Spines on exopods of right legs 1-3 elongate. Exopods of right legs 1 and 2 armed with 1 seta (outer proximal element) and 5 spines. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on right and left legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1V+11; 751; 7
Leg 2V+11; 751; 7
Leg 3VI1; 551; 5
Leg 4IV1; 541; 5
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 62F +) positioned dorsolaterally on fifth pedigerous somite, evenly tapering, 2.4 times longer than wide (140×58 μm), with 1 small seta proximally and 2 small plus 1 larger seta distally; larger distal seta longer than leg (exopodal) segment. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 62G +) represented by 1 spinule and 2 spinule-like processes on genital operculum; 9 small denticle-like elements on surface adjacent to leg 6. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Three outstanding features serve to characterize +BK cçnẚçrhynchus +sp. nov. +as follows: (1) the exopods of right legs 1 and 2 each carry 1 seta in addition to spines; (2) the combination of armature elements on right legs 1-4 is 6-6-6-4, and (3) the endopod of the antenna is apparently 3-segmented, the segmentation has not been recorded previously in +Bçtryllçphẚlus +and, as it appears incomplete, it may represent a distinct fold in the cuticle rather than a true articulation. The combination of armature elements on the exopods of left legs 1-4 (5-5-5-4) also is unusual, known previously only in +B +. +banyulensẚs +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFBEFFA9FA93FECDD133192F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFBEFFA9FA93FECDD133192F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5633fe97cf1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFBEFFA9FA93FECDD133192F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,262 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus curtipes + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 57-59 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1972, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +budẚstçma renẚerẚ +(Hartmeyer, 1912) (MNHN-IT-2008-4188 = +MNHN +A3 +/ +EUD/281 +); +Ibo Is. +, +Mozambique +, AURACEA 1995 cruise, +Stn Pl +20, depth + +6 m + +, +Monniot +coll., + +16 November 1995 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is from the Latin +curt +(=short) and +pes +(=a foot), referring to the short leg 5. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 57A +) rather stout, consisting of broader anterior and narrower posterior parts; body length +1.10 mm +. Anterior part of body broadening posteriorly, divisible by dorsal and lateral constrictions into cephalosome and 4 pedigerous somites; fifth pedigerous somite 388 μm wide, with convex lateral margins ( +Fig. 57B +). Posterior part of body ( +Fig. 57B +) consisting of genital and 4 abdominal somites, indistinctly defined from fifth pedigerous somite. Genital somite about 117×227 μm; genital apertures located dorsally. Four abdominal somites gradually narrowing posteriorly 89×188, 110×166, 105×141, and 154×114 μm, respectively. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 57C +) with short inner margin and much longer outer margin, armed with 4 claws and 1 seta; 1 outer distal claw rounded at tip. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 57D +) small, 113 μm long, 4-segmented; first and second segments expanded; fourth segment with 2 traces of sutures on posterior side; armature formula 9 (3 large and 6 small), 4 (3 large and 1 small), 2 (1 large and 1 small), and 11+aesthetasc. Antenna ( +Fig. 57E, F +) 4-segmented, including obscure coxa; basis and first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment of right antenna 3.2 times longer than wide (68×21 μm), armed with 7 setae; all setae shorter than segment, ornamented with several minute spinules at tip ( +Fig. 57E +). Second endopodal segment of left antenna ( +Fig. 57F +) slightly shorter (61×21 μm) than that of right antenna; setae unornamented, 2 outer distal setae 95 and 76 μm long, distinctly longer than segment. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 58A +) broad, unornamented, with short posteromedial lobe. Mandible ( +Fig. 57G +) with coxal gnathobase bearing distal bifurcate tooth and 2 short teeth on medial margin; palp with 9 setae, as usual for genus. Maxillule ( +Fig. 57H +) with 6 setae on arthrite of precoxa; palp consisting of coxobasis and endopod; coxobasis with 2 medial and 3 outer setae and weakly pronounced distal lobe; endopod wider than long, distinctly articulated from coxobasis, armed with 3 setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 57I +) indistinctly 3-segmented with 3, 4, and 3 setae on first to third segments, respectively; distal seta on third segment naked and carried on digitiform process. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 58B +) 4-segmented; syncoxa broad and unarmed; basis with 2 small setae; first endopodal segment unarmed; second segment slightly longer than first, with 1 small seta; terminal claw as long as second endopodal segment, bearing 2 minute denticles (proximal and subdistal). + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 58 +C-H, 59A, B) biramous, asymmetrical, with 1-segmented exopods and 2-segmented endopods; coxa unarmed; basis with 1 seta on outer margin and patch of spinules at inner distal corner. Inner subdistal seta on exopod of left leg 1 rudimentary. One seta on second endopodal segment of left leg 1 small. Second endopodal segment of right legs 2-4 armed with 1 spine in addition to setae. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on right and left legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1VII1; 671; 7
Leg 2VI1; I+551; 6
Leg 3VI1; I+451; 5
Leg 4IV1; I+441; 5
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 57A, B +) small, lobate, about 1.3 times longer than wide (100×77 μm), with rounded distal margin; armed with 1 proximal and 3 distal setae, all small (shorter than leg segment). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 59C +) represented by 1 spinule and 1 spinule-like process on genital operculum; several spinules on surface adjacent to leg 6. + + + +FIG. 57. +Bçtryllçphẚlus curtẚpes +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, right; B, posterior part of body including fifth pedigerous somite, dorsal; C, caudal ramus; D, antennule; E, right antenna; F, second endopodal segment of left antenna; G, mandible; H, maxillule; I, maxilla. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C-I, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 58. +Bçtryllçphẚlus curtẚpes +sp. nov. +, female. A, labrum; B, maxilliped; C, right leg 1; D, left leg 1; E, right leg 2; F, left leg 2; G, right leg 3; H, left leg 3. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 59. +Bçtryllçphẚlus curtẚpes +sp. nov. +, female. A, right leg 4; B, left leg 4; C, right genital aperture. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The combination of armature on the exopods of right legs 1-4 (7-6-6-4) and left legs 1-4 (7-5-5-4) of +B +. +curtẚpes +sp. nov. +is unique within +Bçtryllçphẚlus +. The combination of armature on the endopods of the right legs (7- 7-6-6) and left legs (8-7-6-6) of +B +. +curtẚpes +sp. nov. +is also unusual; the former combination is shared only with +B +. +mẚllarẚ +and the latter combination is shared only with +B +. +stenurçsus +sp. nov. +and + +B +. +pentachaetus + + +sp. nov. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFC0FFDFFA93FC94D0971E9F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFC0FFDFFA93FC94D0971E9F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5bbccea3097 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFC0FFDFFA93FC94D0971E9F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,243 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Bathycopola setifera + +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 20 +, +21 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1948, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +Cnemẚdçcarpa dẚgçnas +Monniot C. +& +Monniot F. +, 1968; +Bay of Biscay +, BIOGAS 3 +Expedition +, +RV +“Jean Charcot”, +Stn DS +45 ( +47°33.9´N +, +09°38.4´W +), depth + +4260 m + +, + +September 1973 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name refers to the presence of a seta on the proximal margin of the coxal gnathobase of the mandible. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 20A, B +) narrow, +1.28 mm +long. Prosome cylindrical, longer than urosome, consisting of cephalosome and 4 pedigerous somites; maximum width of body 339 μm at level of second pediger- ous somite. Pedigerous somites discernible by 3 dorsal suture lines, becoming longer from anterior to posterior; posterodorsal border of fourth pedigerous somite produced posterodorsally, with rounded posterodorsal margin. Urosome ( +Fig. 20C +) 5-segmented; fifth pedigerous somite short, indistinctly demarcated from prosome. Genital somite as long as wide (170×170 μm), bearing copulatory pore on ventral surface. Three abdominal somites 110×143, 70×127, and 60×110 μm, respectively. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 20D +) about 2.3 times longer than wide (55×24 μm), slightly shorter than anal somite, with convex inner margin; armed with 1 lateral seta, 1 inner subdistal seta, and 3 spines plus 1 seta distally; lateral seta positioned at 40% of ramus length; lateral and inner subdistal setae more than half length of ramus; distal spines small, outer spine longest (15 μm); small distal seta spiniform. + + +Rostrum as blunt anterior prominence of cephalosome ( +Fig. 20A, B +). Antennule ( +Fig. 20E +) slender, 85 μm long, 6-segmented; armature formula 2, 7, 3, 6+aesthetasc, 2+aesthetasc, and 11+2 aesthetascs; aesthetascs small and setiform. Antenna ( +Fig. 20F +) 3-segmented, consisting of coxobasis and 2-segmented endopod; coxobasis 54×33 μm, with 1 large, spinulose spine (31 μm long); first endopodal segment 44×27 μm, with 1 seta on inner margin; second endopodal segment 2.12 times longer than wide (36×17 μm); armed with 2 setae in middle of inner margin and 3 setae distally plus terminal claw 36 μm long, as long as second endopodal segment. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 20G +) forming 2 tapering posterior lobes, with deep and wide posteromedian incision; both lobes bearing medially facing pair of teeth at apex. Mandible ( +Fig. 20H +) consisting of coxa and palp: coxal gnathobase bearing strong distal tooth and 5 spiniform denticles on medial margin and 1 spinulose seta (arrowed) on proximal margin; palp biramous, bearing 3 setae on mediodistal corner of basis, 4 setae on exopod and 6 setae on endopod; endopod distinctly articulated from basis, but exopod not articulated at base. Maxillule ( +Fig. 20I +) consisting of precoxa with 9 setae on arthrite, and biramous palp with 6 setae on medial margin of basis; exopod and endopod lobate, not articulated from basis, bearing 2 and 4 setae, respectively; 1 seta present between basis and arthrite. Maxilla ( +Fig. 21A +) 3-segmented; syncoxa bearing 2 endites, each tipped with 1 seta, seta on proximal endite not articulated at base; basis with strong claw plus 2 setae; endopod small, 1-segmented, with 6 setae (1 inserted in middle of segment). Maxilliped ( +Fig. 21B +) as tapering lobe bearing 6 setae (4 medial and 2 apical) and 2 rows of minute spinules. + + + +FIG. 20. + +Bathycçpçla +setẚfera + +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, urosome, ventral; D, right caudal ramus, dorsal; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum; H, mandible; I, maxillule. Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm; D-I, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 21. + +Bathycçpçla +setẚfera + +gen. et sp. nov +., female. A, maxilla; B, maxilliped; C, leg 1; D, leg 2; E, leg 3; F, leg 4; G, leg 5; H, genital aperture. Scale bars: A-F, H, 0.02 mm; G, 0.1 mm. + + + +Legs 1-2 ( +Fig. 21 +C-F) biramous with 2-segmented rami; coxa lacking inner seta. Legs 3 and 4 ( +Fig. 21E, F +) with 2-segmented exopods and 1-segmented endopods; coxa of legs 3 and 4 bearing inner seta; endopods subdivided by partial suture line on outer side. Outer spine on first exopodal segment of legs 2-4 elongated. Most of spines on rami of legs 1-4 spinulose distally. Legs 3 and 4 with same armature; armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-II-0; III, I, III0-0; I, II, I
Leg 20-01-0I-0; III, I, III+10-0; I, II, II
Legs 3 & 40-11-0I-0; III, I, IVI, II, II
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 21G +) consisting of lamellate protopod and small exopod; protopod oval, 375×257 μm, extending beyond distal margin of first abdominal somite, armed with 1 minute seta on ventral side of distal margin; exopod about 2.2 times longer than wide (86×39 μm), bearing 6 unequal setae (1 on ventral margin and 5 on distal margin); left and right legs fused with each other proximally on ventral surface ( +Fig. 20C +). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 21H +) represented by 3 small spines on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +In + +Bathycçpçla + + +gen. nov. + +the leg armature seems to be a robust taxonomic character that can be used to differentiate between species, but +B +. +setẚfera +gen. et sp. nov. +and +B +. +brevẚcaudata +gen. et sp. nov. +have the same armature formula for the rami of legs 2-4. In addition, both species share a 3-segmented maxilla. The major differences between the two species are in the number of setae on the maxillary endopod and the maxilliped, and the presence or absence of the inner coxal seta on leg 3 ( +Table 1 +). The segmentation of legs 3 and 4 and the length of some of the exopodal spines on these legs also differ significantly between the two species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFC7FFD2FA93FECDD6B51FBF.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFC7FFD2FA93FECDD6B51FBF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a1f6811f010 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFC7FFD2FA93FECDD6B51FBF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,297 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Bathycopola dicarpae + +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 18 +, +19 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1947, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +aẚcarpa lata +Monniot C. +& +Monniot F. +, 1976 (MNHN-IT-2008-2786 = +MNHN +S1 +/ +DIC/10 +); +Angola +Basin +, South Atlantic, +Walda +cruise, +RV +“Jean Charcot”, +Stn Cy +02 ( +18°52.1’S +, +07°23.1’E +), depth + +5124 m + +, + +06 June 1971 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The generic name of the ascidian host, +aẚcarpa +, provides the specific name of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 18A, B +) narrow; body length +1.88 mm +. Prosome cylindrical, unsegmented, 1.24× +0.42 mm +, occupying 66% of body length, with parallel lateral margins. Cephalic shield distinct; 4 pedigerous somites obscurely discernible by traces of tergites and surface wrinkles. Urosome ( +Fig. 18C +) directed posteroventrally, 5-segmented; first urosomite (fifth pedigerous somite) short, obscure. Genital somite 242×197 μm, bearing small copulatory pore proximally on ventral surface. Three abdominal somites 152×148, 121×136, and 76×115 μm, respectively. Caudal rami widely separated from each other; each ramus ( +Fig. 18D +) about 3.04 times longer than wide (76×25 μm), as long as anal somite; armed with 1 lateral seta, 1 subdistal seta, and 3 spines and 1 seta distally; distal spines shorter than ramus width, longest one 15 μm long, and smallest seta spiniform; subdistal seta 40 μm long, about twice as long as lateral seta; lateral seta positioned at 44% region of ramus length. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 18E +) slender, about 220 μm long, 6-segmented with second segment sub- divided into 3 and 5 setae regions; armature formula 2, 8, 4, 6+aesthetasc. 2+aesthetasc, and 9+2 aesthetascs; second to terminal segments ornamented with 1 to 6 transverse rows of fine spinules. Antenna ( +Fig. 18F +) 4-segmented, consisting of coxa, basis, and 2-segmented endopod; coxa short and unarmed; basis 1.5 times longer than wide (64×41 μm), broadening distally, armed with 1 large spine distally (45 μm long); first endopodal segment 44×28 μm, about 0.7 times as long as basis, bearing 1 seta on inner margin; second endopodal segment twice as long as wide (36×18 μm), shorter than first; armed with 5 setae ( +2 in +middle and 3 distally) plus terminal claw 32 μm long, slightly shorter than second endopodal segment. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 18G +) short and broad, bearing 2 pairs of tooth-like processes, as in preceding species, but with shallow posteromedian incision. Mandible ( +Fig. 18H +) consisting of coxa and palp; medial margin of coxal gnathobase bearing 1 strong tooth distally and several spinules along middle and proximal regions; palp consisting of basis, exopod and endopod; basis with 3 setae mediodistally; exopod with 4 weakly pinnate setae; endopod incompletely articulated from basis, armed with 5 or 6 setae distally. Maxillule ( +Fig. 18I +) consisting of precoxa bearing 9 setae on arthrite and unsegmented palp, bearing coxal endite, basis, and lobate exopod and endopod; armed with 1 seta on coxal endite, 6 on basis along bilobed medial margin (3 on proximal and 3 on distal lobes), 2 large, weakly pinnate setae on exopod, and 3 on endopod. Maxilla ( +Fig. 19A +) 4-segmented, consisting of syncoxa, basis, and 2-segmented endopod; syncoxa broad, bearing 2 prominent endites each tipped with 1 seta, seta on proximal endite not articulated at base; basis drawn out to robust claw bearing 2 setae near base; endopod small, with 1 and 4 setae on first and second segments, respectively. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 19B +) as spinulose lobe bearing 4 or 5 setae (1 seta positioned at apex). + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 19 +C-F) biramous with 2-segmented rami. Inner coxal seta absent in legs 1 and 2, but present in legs 3 and 4. Rami of legs 1-4 armed with spines only except first exopodal segment of legs 3 and 4 bearing outer seta, outer spine present on same segment in legs 1 and 2. Distal spine on second exopodal segment of legs 2-4 elongated, about 3 times longer than nearby spines. First endopodal segment of legs 1-4 unarmed.Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-II-0; III, I, III0-0; I, II, I
Leg 20-01-0I-0; III, I, III0-0; I, II, II
Leg 30-11-01-0; III, I, III0-0; I, II, II
Leg 40-11-01-0; III, I, II0-0; I, II, II
+ + + +FIG. 18. + +Bathycçpçla +dẚcarpae + +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, urosome, ventral; D, right caudal ramus, ventral; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum; H, mandible; I, maxillule. Scale bars, A, B, 0.2 mm; C, 0.1 mm; D-I, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 19. + +Bathycçpçla +dẚcarpae + +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilla; B, maxilliped; C, leg 1; D, leg 2; E, leg 3; F, leg 4; G, leg 5; H, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, B, H, 0.02 mm; C-F, 0.05 mm; G, 0.1 mm. + + + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 19G +) consisting of lamellate protopod and small exopod; protopod 475×330 μm, extending beyond posterior margin of genital somite, bearing 1 thin seta distally; exopod about 1.83 times longer than wide (106×58 μm), slightly tapering; armed with 6 setae (1 on subdistal ventral margin and 5 on distal margin). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 19H +) represented by 3 small spiniform elements on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. + +Bathycçpçla +dẚcarpae + +gen. et sp. nov. +has a 4-segmented maxilla, and is armed with 7 spines on the second exopodal segment of legs 2 and 3, plus 4 spines on the second endopodal segment of leg 4. These features are shared only with the +type +species, + +B +. +karubar + + +gen. et sp. nov. + +However, +B +. +dẚcarpae +gen. et sp. nov. +can be readily distinguished from + +B +. +karubar + + +gen. et sp. nov. + +by the following character states: (1) the second endopodal segment of the maxilla bears 4 setae in +BK dẚcarpae +gen. et sp. nov. +(cf. 5 setae in + +B +. +karubar + + +gen. et sp. nov. + +); (2) the maxilliped bears 4 or 5 setae (cf. 7 setae); (3) the second endopodal segment of legs 2 and 3 bears 5 spines (cf. 4 spines); (4) the second exopodal segment of leg 4 bears 6 spines (cf. 7 spines); (5) legs 3 and 4 bear an inner seta on the coxa (cf. seta absent in + +B +. +karubar + + +gen. et sp. nov. + +); and (6) the exopod of leg 5 is about 1.83 times longer than wide (cf. about 2.89 times in + +B +. +karubar + + +gen. et sp. nov. + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFC9FFD8FA93FB2DD7641ED3.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFC9FFD8FA93FB2DD7641ED3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..19a11c4f0d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFC9FFD8FA93FB2DD7641ED3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,910 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + +Family + +Botryllophilidae +Sars, 1921 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Female: Body inflated, unsegmented or obscurely segmented, consisting of anterior and posterior parts, without distinct prosome-urosome division. Anterior part of body consisting of cephalosome to fifth pedigerous somites, posterior part consisting of genital somite and abdomen. Abdomen basically 4-segmented but with pattern obscured by additional annulations in some species of +Bçtryllçphẚlus +and +Schẚzçprçctus +. Caudal ramus armed with 6 armature elements (some represented by claws), or occasionally some lost. Rostrum weak or absent. Antennule short, at most 5-segmented. Antenna uniramous, 2- to 4-segmented, consisting coxa, basis, and 1- or 2-segmented endopod, and armed with up to 8 setal elements (setae or spines); coxa and basis sometimes fused to form coxobasis. Mandible variable, consisting of coxa bearing well-developed gnathobase and setiferous palp in +Bçtryllçphẚlus +and +Schẚzçprçctus +, but palp absent or consisting of 1- or 2-segmented lobe tipped with 1 or 2 armature elements in other genera. Maxillule consisting of precoxa and palp in +Bçtryllçphẚlus +, +Schẚzçprçctus +and +eaplçstçmẚdes +, but absent or represented by small lobe in other genera. Maxilla primitively 3-segmented, armed with up to 10 setae in +Bçtryllçphẚlus +and +Schẚzçprçctus +, but absent or reduced to 1- or 2-segmented lobe bearing 1 or 2 setae in other genera. Maxilliped 4-segmented, consisting of syncoxa, basis, and 2-segmented endopod plus terminal claw; in +eaplçstçmella +endopodal segments and terminal claw usually fused to form subchela. Legs 1-4 biramous with 1- or 2-segmented rami; coxa lacking inner element; basis lacking inner distal element in leg 1. Legs 1-4 of +Bçtryllçphẚlus +usually showing left-right asymmetry. Leg 5 variable, present as digitiform process, lamellate, or represented by small lobe, bearing up to 4 setae. Leg 6 represented by 3 spiniform elements on genital operculum. + + +Male +: Body cyclopiform with distinct prosome-urosome division. Urosome consisting of fifth pedigerous, genital and 4 abdominal somites. Caudal ramus armed with 6 setae. Antennule 4-segmented, with numerous aesthetascs on proximal segment (antennule of +eaplçstçmella +8-segmented, with few aesthetascs on proximal segment). Antenna as in female. Mandible, maxillule and maxilla absent or vestigial. Maxilliped similar to that of female. Legs 1-4 biramous typically with 3-segmented rami, but leg 1 endopod 1- to 3-segmented, with modified setation and leg 4 endopod 2- or 3-segmented. Inner coxal seta present or absent. Basis of leg 1 with or without inner distal element. Leg 5 consisting of outer protopodal seta located laterally on surface of somite and free exopodal segment bearing 2 setae. Leg 6 represented by 2 setae on genital operculum. + + + + + +Type +genus. + +Schẚzçprçctus +Aurivillius, 1885 +. + + +Other included genera. +Bçtryllçphẚlus +Hesse, 1864, +eaplçstçmẚdes +Chatton & Harant, 1924, +eaplçstçma +Chatton & Harant, 1924, +eaplçsaccus +Chatton & Harant, 1924, +eaplçstçmella +Chatton & Harant, 1924, and +maulẚllgẚa +Monniot C., 1982. + + + + +Remarks. +In their revision of the family +Ascidicolidae, Illg +& + +Dudley +(1980) + +treated the Botryllophilinae as a subfamily comprising two valid genera, +Bçtryllçphẚlus +and +Schẚzçprçctus +. They classified it as a +nçmen cçnservandum +and attributed it to +Sars (1921) +. Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +took this action because they recognised that the family name Schizoproctidae +Aurivillius, 1885 +has priority over the + +Botryllophilidae +Sars, 1921 + +, but the name Schizoproctidae had not been used in the preceding 50 years, However, no formal case was made to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. In continuing to use +Botryllophilidae +as a conserved name, +Boxshall & Halsey (2004) +followed Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +in the interests of nomenclatural stability, and we continue this usage here. + + +Boxshall & Halsey (2004) +pointed to a number of synapomorphies between +Bçtryllçphẚlus +and +Schẚzçprçctus +and the genera +eaplçstçmẚdes +, +eaplçstçma +, +eaplçsaccus +, and +eaplçstçmella +which were placed in the subfamily +Haplostominae Chatton & Harant, 1924 +by Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +. +Monniot (1982) +subsequently added another genus, +maulẚllgẚa +, to the +Haplostominae +. +Boxshall & Halsey (2004) +considered that the synapomorphies, especially those exhibited by the males, constituted strong evidence of a close relationship and they did not adopt the subfamilial division, instead they recognised all seven genera as members of a single family level taxon, for which they used the name +Botryllophilidae +. + + + +Genus + +Botryllophilus +Hesse, 1864 + + + + + + +Diagnosis +(female). Body usually asymmetrical, consisting of broader anterior part and narrower posterior part. Anterior part consisting of cephalosome and first to fifth pedigerous somites. Posterior part consisting of genital somite and abdomen; abdomen comprising 4 somites in some species, or 5 to 8 annulations in others. Caudal rami short, with 4 claws and 1 or 2 setae; claws curved outwards or ventrally. Rostrum present or absent. Antennule short and broad, 4- or 5-segmented. Antenna consisting of short coxa, basis, and 1- to 3-segmented endopod (endopod mostly 2-segmented), armed with 5 to 8 setae, usually asymmetrical between right and left antennae in form and length of setae. Labrum not specialized. Mandible consisting of coxa and palp; medial margin of coxal gnathobase bearing 3 or 4 teeth distally and spinulose proximal part; palp elongate, unsegmented, typically armed with 9 setae: 3 (exopodal setae) on outer proximal region, +2 in +subdistal region, and 4 distally. Maxillule consisting of precoxa with 4 to 7 setae on arthrite, and palp consisting of coxobasis and endopod; coxobasis with 2 setae on medial margin, 3 setae (exopodal setae) on outer margin, and usually with 1 small seta representing epipodite; endopod with 3 setae on distal margin. Maxilla obscurely 2- or 3-segmented, armed with up to 10 setae. Maxilliped consisting of syncoxa, basis, and small 2-segmented endopod with small terminal claw; armed with 0 to 2 setae on syncoxa, 2 setae on basis. Legs 1-4 biramous with at most 2-segmented rami, lacking inner seta on coxa, but with outer seta on basis. Exopods 1 or 2-segmented; endopods occasionally 1-segmented in leg 1, but 2-segmented in legs 2-4. Segmentation of leg rami often incomplete. Basis of leg 1 lacking inner distal element. Each pair of legs 1-4 asymmetrical between right and left sides (except symmetrical in +B +. +macrçpus +Canu, 1891). Right exopods usually armed with spines and left exopods with setae. Leg 5 lobate or digitiform, positioned dorsolaterally or laterally on somite; armed with 4 setae; left and right legs widely separated from each other. + + + + + +Type +species. + +Bçtryllçphẚlus ruber +Hesse, 1864, by original designation. + + + + +Remarks. +According to +Schellenberg (1922) +, three species in the genus +Bçtryllçphẚlus +have symmetrical exopods of legs 1-4: +B +. +aspẚnçsus +Schellenberg, 1922 +, +B +. +macrçpus +Canu, 1891, and +B +. +ruber +Hesse, 1864. Of these three, +B +. +ruber +was redescribed by +Ooishi (1999) +and was shown to have asymmetrical legs 3 and 4. +Ooishi (2014b) +restudied +B +. +aspẚnçsus +and mentioned that right and left endopods of leg 4 are armed with different numbers of setae (6 and 7, respectively), which means that at least leg 4 of this species is also asymmetrical. Therefore, within the genus +Bçtryllçphẚlus +the only species that exhibits true symmetry in all pairs of swimming legs is +B +. +macrçpus +, as redescribed by +Ooishi (1996: 179) +. + + +Lang (1948) +was of the opinion that the structure and armature of the swimming legs was highly variable in +Bçtryllçphẚlus +species, and subsequently +Stock (1970) +refrained from using leg structure for distinguishing between the species he was studying. The variability +Lang (1948) +mentioned mainly referred to the symmetry and segmentation of legs, and we have been unable to confirm the existence of any infraspecific variability in leg setation with respect to all of the species we have examined in this account, with the exception of +B +. +nçrvegẚcus +in which the exopod of the right leg showed variation in setation. On the evidence available to us, we have found leg setation to be an extremely valuable taxonomic character for the recognition of species of +Bçtryllçphẚlus +. + + +Ooishi & Illg (1988) recognized +two female +morphotypes in +Bçtryllçphẚlus +: +type +A, with a 4-segmented abdomen, and +type +B which has an apparently 5- to 8-segmented abdomen. +Huys & Boxshall (1991) +suggested the latter condition was the result of secondary annulation and +Boxshall & Halsey (2004) +considered that the female abdomen was primitively 4-segmented but that this segmentation was obscured by secondary annulations in +type +B species. Subsequently, +Ooishi (2000) +divided morphotype A into subgroups I and II, based on leg armature patterns. However, the distinctiveness of these subgroups has been blurred due to the discovery in the present work of several new species that have leg setation patterns that deviate markedly from both of Ooishi’s patterns. + + +Bçtryllçphẚlus +currently comprises 19 valid species ( +Ooishi, 2014d +). Thirteen new species are described in the present work. The numbers of armature elements on rami of the right and left legs +1-4 in +Bçtryllçphẚlus +species are compared in +Table 2 +. + + + +TABLE 2. +Armature of legs 1-4 in +Bçtryllçphẚlus +species (four groups with same combination of armature elements shown in bold). Abbreviations: Enp = endopod, Exp = exopod. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Armature of legs 1-4
SpeciesRight ExpRight EnpLeft ExpLeft EnpSource
+B +. +macrçpus +Canu, 1891 +7-8-9-98-8-7-67-8-9-98-8-7-6 +Ooishi (1996) +
+B +. +symmetrẚcus +Ooishi, 2014 +7-6-6-68-8-6-67-6-6-68-9-7-6 +Ooishi (2014b) +
+B +. +cçnẚcus +Conradi et al., 1994 +7-6-6-68-8-7-66-5-5-67-8-7-6 +Conradi et al. (1994) +
+B +. +aspẚnçsus +Schellenberg, 1922 +6-6-?-58-8-6-66-6-?-58-8-6-7 +Ooishi (2014b) +
+B +. +randallẚ +Stock, 1970 +7-6-6-68-7-8-66-5-5-57-9-7-6 +Stock (1970) +
+B +. +ruber +Hesse, 1864 + +7-6-6-6 + +8-9-7-6 + +7-6-6-6 + +8-9-7-6 + +Ooishi (1999) +
+B +. +dentẚrçstrẚs +sp. nov. + +7-6-6-6 + +8-9-7-6 + +7-6-6-6 + +8-9-7-6 +Present study
+B +. +bermudensẚs +sp. nov. +7-6-6-68-9-6-67-6-6-68-9-7-6Present study
+B +. +lçngẚpes +sp. nov. +7-6-6-68-9-7-67-5-5-58-9-7-6Present study
+B +. +antarctẚcus +sp. nov. +6-5-6-68-9-6-56-5-5-67-8-7-6Present study
+B +. +guadelçupensẚs +sp. nov. +6-6-6-68-9-7-65-5-5-58-9-7-6Present study
+B +. +nçrvegẚcus +Schellenberg, 1921 +7-6-6-6*8-8-6-67-6-6-68-8-6-6 +Ooishi (1996) +
+B +. +neapçlẚtanus +Ooishi, 2006 + +7-6-6-5 + +8-8-6-6 + +7-6-6-5 + +8-8-6-6 + +Ooishi (2006) +
+B +. +kçzlçffẚ +Ooishi, 2014 + +7-6-6-5 + +8-8-6-6 + +7-6-6-5 + +8-8-6-6 + +Ooishi (2014c) +
+B +. +banyulensẚs +Brément, 1909 +6-6-6-58-7-6-65-5-5-48-8-6-6 +Ooishi (2006) +
+B +. +mẚllarẚ +Ooishi, 2014 +6-5-5-57-7-6-66-4-4-57-7-6-6 +Ooishi (2014c) +
+B +. +brevẚpes +Brément, 1909 + +7-6-6-5 + +8-8-6-6 + +6-5-5-4 + +8-8-6-6 + +Ooishi (2006) +
+B +. +dẚstẚnctus +Ooishi, 2012 + +7-6-6-5 + +8-8-6-6 + +6-5-5-4 + +8-8-6-6 + +Ooishi (2012) +
+ + +KKKCçntẚnued çn the next page + + + +TABLE 2. ( +Continued) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Armature of legs 1-4
SpeciesRight ExpRight EnpLeft ExpLeft EnpSource
+ +B +. +tuberculatus + + +sp. nov. + + +7-6-6-5 + +8-8-6-6 + +6-5-5-4 + +8-8-6-6 +Present study
+B +. +stenurçsus +sp. nov. +7-6-6-58-8-6-66-5-5-48-7-6-6Present study
+B +. +spẚnulçsus +Ooishi, 2012 +7-6-6-58-8-6-66-5-5-58-8-6-6 +Ooishi (2012) +
+B +. +lçngẚcaudatus +sp. nov. +7-6-6-58-8-?-66-5-5-58-8-6-6Present study
+ +B +. +pentachaetus + + +sp. nov. + +7-6-6-58-7-6-67-6-6-58-7-6-6Present study
+ +B +. +angustus + + +sp. nov. + +7-6-6-68-8-6-66-5-5-48-8-6-6Present study
+B +. +curtẚpes +sp. nov. +7-6-6-47-7-6-67-5-5-48-7-6-6Present study
+B +. +abbçttẚ +Ooishi & Illg, 1989 +6-5-5-48-7-5-55-4-4-38-7-5-6Ooishi & Illg (1989)
+B +. +ẚnaequẚpes +Hansen, 1923 +6-5-5-48-7-5-55-4-4-39-7-5-5 +Ooishi (2002b) +
+B +. +bamfẚeldensẚs +Ooishi, 2000 + +6-5-5-4 + +8-7-5-5 + +5-4-4-3 + +8-7-5-5 + +Ooishi (2000) +
+B +. +kçreensẚs +Seo & Lee, 1995 + +6-5-5-4 + +8-7-5-5 + +5-4-4-3 + +8-7-5-5 + +Seo & Lee (1995) +
+B +. +sarsẚ +Ooishi, 2002 + +6-5-5-4 + +8-7-5-5 + +5-4-4-3 + +8-7-5-5 + +Ooishi (2002c) +
+B +. +cçnẚçrhynchus +sp. nov. +6-6-6-48-8-6-65-5-5-48-8-6-6Present study
+B +. +nudẚsetatus +sp. nov. +5-4-3-47-7-5-55-4-3-37-7-5-5Present study
+ + +*Exopod of right leg 4 of +B +. +nçrvegẚcus +is armed with 6 or 7 spines + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFCAFFC4FA93FC75D56019F7.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFCAFFC4FA93FC75D56019F7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fe61e3146da --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFCAFFC4FA93FC75D56019F7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,274 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus dentirostris + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 24-26 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1951), +4 ♀♀ +paratypes +(intact, MNHN-IU-2018-1952) and +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17363) from +budẚstçma clarum +( +Van Name +, 1902) (MNHN-IT-2008-4031 = +MNHN +A3 +/ +EUD/35 +); +Guadeloupe +Stn +13, +West +of l’îlet à +Cochons +, depth + +5-10 m + +, +Monniot +coll., + +23 December 1980 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name refers to the presence of rows of denticles on the ventral surface of the rostrum. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 24A, B +) with broader anterior and narrower posterior parts, ventrally flexed between two parts. Body length 927 μm in figured specimen; maximum width 290 μm across second pedigerous somite. Anterior part slightly depressed, consisting of cephalosome and first to fifth pedigerous somites, with nearly parallel lateral margins; all somites of anterior part well-defined in dorsal view. Posterior part ( +Fig. 24C +) slightly directed to left or right side, comprising genital somite and abdomen consisting of 8 annulations. Genital somite 110×184 μm, with convex lateral margins; genital areas located dorsally. Abdomen distinctly annulated; anterior 7 annulations much shorter than wide, 164 μm long in total; last annulation (anal somite) 73×82 μm. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 24D +) armed with 4 claws distally (2 larger inner and 2 smaller outer) and 1 dorsal seta and ornamented with 3 or 4 denticles (indicated by arrowhead in +Fig. 24D +) at outer proximal corner; one of outer claws blunt, with minute spinules at tip. + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 24E +) rectangular, much wider than long, ornamented with oblique rows of 5 denticles ventrally on each side and with lobate tubercles posteromedially. Antennule ( +Fig. 24F +) short and broad, distinctly 5-segment- ed; distal 3 segments much narrower than proximal 2 segments; armature formula 10 (5 large and 5 small), 4 (2 large and 2 small), 2 (1 large and 1 small), 4, and 7+aesthetasc; all setae naked. Right antenna ( +Fig. 24G +) 4-segmented, consisting of coxa, basis, and 2-segmented endopod; coxa short and unarmed; basis longest segment, unarmed; first endopodal segment short and unarmed; second endopodal segment about 3.6 times longer than wide (64×18 μm), armed with 1 spine and 7 setae; proximal 2 inner setae naked; third inner element (spine) spinulose; innermost distal seta minute; 4 distal setae unequal in length, bearing spinules distally on inner margin. Left antenna with 2 outer distal setae slightly longer than those on right antenna. + + + +FIG. 24. +Bçtryllçphẚlus dentẚrçstrẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, posterior part of body, dorsal; D, caudal ramus; E, rostrum; F, antennule; G, antenna; H, labrum; I, mandible; J, maxillule. Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm; D-J, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 25. +Bçtryllçphẚlus dentẚrçstrẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilla; B, maxilliped; C, right leg 1; D, left leg 1; E, right leg 2; F, left leg 2. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 24H +) subtriangular with well-sclerotized outer margins and soft ventral inflation bearing tapering lobe distally. Mandible ( +Fig. 24I +) consisting of coxa and palp; medial margin of coxal gnathobase bearing 3 teeth distally (distalmost elongate with minute spinules along proximal margin) and finely spinulose proximally; palp unsegmented, with medial inflation near middle, armed with 3 outer setae (exopodal setae) proximally, 2 subdistal setae, and 4 distal setae; small, outer subdistal and outer distal seta naked, other setae pinnate. Maxillule ( +Fig. 24J +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa with 5 distinct setae and 1 minute seta on arthrite; palp consisting of coxobasis and endopod; coxobasis with 2 medial setae, 3 outer setae, 1 seta on epipodite, and 1 outer distal tubercle; endopod well-defined from coxobasis, with 3 setae distally. Maxilla ( +Fig. 25A +) obscurely 2-segmented and armed with 10 setae (6 larger and 4 smaller). Maxilliped ( +Fig. 25B +) 4-segmented; consisting of syncoxa, basis, and small, 2-segmented endopod bearing terminal claw; syncoxa broad, with 1 small seta on inner margin and 2 rows of fine spinules each on inner distal and outer middle surfaces; basis with 2 small setae subdistally and 1 row of fine spinules mediodistally; first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment with minute seta on inner margin; terminal claw slender, longer than segment and bearing 2 denticles on inner margin (1 proximally and 1 subdistally). + + + +FIG. 26. +Bçtryllçphẚlus dentẚrçstrẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, right leg 3; B, left leg 3; C, right leg 4; D, left leg 4; E, leg 5; F, left genital aperture. Scale bars: A-D, F, 0.02 mm; E, 0.05 mm. + + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 25 +C-F; 26A-D) biramous with 2-segmented rami; each leg asymmetrical between right and left members; coxae lacking inner element, but with row of minute spinules at mediodistal corner; basis with outer seta. Exopods of swimming legs spinulose along outer margins, mainly near bases of spines and setae; exopods of right swimming legs armed with spines, but endopods of right swimming legs and both rami of left swimming legs armed with setae. First endopodal segment of leg 1 with setulose tubercle on anterior surface. Second exopodal segment of left legs 3 and 4 elongated, hook-like ( +Fig. 26B, D +), with pronounced subdistal process at base of third outer seta. One seta (inner subdistal seta) on second exopodal segment of left swimming legs vestigial. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on rami of legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1I; VI1; 71; 51; 7
Leg 2I; V1; 81; 51; 8
Leg 3I; V1; 61; 51; 6
Leg 4I; V1; 51; 51; 5
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 26E +) tapering, approximately 210×100 μm, curved, with concave inner margin; armed with 4 naked setae (1 proximal, 1 subdistal, and 2 distal). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 26F +) represented by 2 spinules and 1 setule in genital area. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Bçtryllçphẚlus dentẚrçstrẚs +sp. nov. +shares the same armature formula of legs 1-4 only with +B +. +ruber +. Both species also share an additional rare feature, i.e., the rami of all the swimming legs are 2-segmented ( +B +. +macrçpus +is the only other species that shares this feature). +Bçtryllçphẚlus ruber +was fully redescribed by +Ooishi (1999) +and, unlike in that species, the second exopodal segment of left legs 3 and 4 of +B +. +dentẚrçstrẚs +sp. nov. +is characteristically elongated and hook-like. In +B +. +ruber +, the rostrum is feeble, tapering, and lacks denticles (cf. rectangular and ornamented with rows of denticles in +B +. +dentẚrçstrẚs +sp. nov. +), the maxilla is armed with 8 setae and 1 minute seta (cf. with 10 setae in +B +. +dentẚrçstrẚs +sp. nov. +), the inner margin of the second endopodal segment of the antenna bears 3 spines (cf. 2 setae and 1 spine in +B +. +dentẚrçstrẚs +sp. nov. +). These differences are sufficient to differentiate between these two species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFCCFFDBFA93F9F4D5B3192B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFCCFFDBFA93F9F4D5B3192B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..914383b881b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFCCFFDBFA93F9F4D5B3192B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Buprorides trilobatus + +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 22 +, +23 +) + + + + +Type material. +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1949, damaged, dissected and mounted on a slide) and + +Paratype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1950, damaged, dissected and mounted on a slide) from unidentified +Didemnidae +; Mont Jumeaux west, +Norfolk Ridge +, +North +of +New Caledonia +, CHALCAL 2 cruise, +RV +“Coriolis”, +Stn DW +79, depth + +243 m + +, +Bouchet +, +Métivier +& +Richer +de Forges-IRD coll., + +30 October 1986 + + +. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name refers to the trilobed maxilliped of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body form and size unknown due to damage to specimens. Cephalosome ( +Fig. 22A +) depressed, subcircular, 126×148 μm, well-defined from trunk by deep constriction. Urosome ( +Fig. 24B +) wider than long, constricted anteriorly; abdomen semicircular, unarmed, shorter than leg 5. Caudal rami absent. + + + +FIG. 22. +Buprçrẚdes trẚlçbatus +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, cephalosome, dorsal; B, urosome; C, rostrum; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, labrum; G, mandible; H, gnathobase of mandibular coxa; I, maxillule; J, maxilla; K, maxilliped. Scale bars: A, 0.05 mm; B-K, 0.01 mm. + + + + +FIG. 23. +Buprçrẚdes trẚlçbatus +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 2; C, leg 3; D, leg 4. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + +Rostrum ( +Fig. 22C +) strongly tapering, slightly wider than long, rounded apically, not demarcated from cephalosome. Antennule ( +Fig. 22D +) 5-segmented; terminal segment longest; first segment much broader than distal segments, with transverse band of sclerotization, and armed with 2 setae; second to fifth segments armed with 6, 4, 3, and 11+aesthetasc, including insertion scars of setae on terminal segment; all setae naked. Antenna ( +Fig. 22E +) 3-segmented, consisting of basis and 2 endopodal segments, strongly flexed between basis and first endopodal segment; armature formula 1, 4, and 6; basis 33×13 μm; first and second endopodal segments 21×11 and 15×9 μm, respectively: distalmost seta on first endopodal segment larger than proximal 3 setae, bluntly tipped and spinulose distally; all 6 setae on second endopodal segment naked and bluntly tipped. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 22F +) wider than long, narrowing distally, with setules laterally on distal margin and 2 rows of minute spinules: 1 row along concave medial part of distal margin and other row on subdistal medial region of ventral surface. Mandible ( +Fig. 22G, H +) consisting of coxa and 1-segmented palp; coxa with well-developed gnathobase bearing on medial margin 2 bifurcate distal teeth, 1 spinulose tooth, and proximally 3 small bifurcate spinules and 1 setule; distal margin bearing 1 small setule; palp 2.6 times longer than wide (13×5 μm), armed distally with 3 setae of unequal lengths, longest about 2.5 times longer than segment. Maxillule ( +Fig. 22I +) bilobed; inner lobe (precoxa) with 7 thick, spinulose spines on medial margin; outer lobe (palp) narrower than inner lobe, armed with 2 longer subdistal and 2 shorter distal setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 22J +) consisting of syncoxa and allobasis; syncoxa broad, with 1 large mediodistal endite tipped with massive, spinulose, globular proximal element and 1 broad, spinulose distal seta; allobasis with 3 outer subdistal and 2 distal, spinulose setae (proximal of 2 distal setae broad and spiniform). Maxilliped ( +Fig. 22K +) plate-like, narrowing proximally, trilobed along distal margin, unarmed, but densely ornamented with spinules on distal surface. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 23 +A-D) biramous with 2-segmented rami, and armed only with naked setae; coxa lacking inner seta; intercoxal sclerite not discernible. Basis of leg 1 lacking inner distal element. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + +Coxa Basis Exopod Endopod +Leg 1 0-0 1-0 1-0; 2, 1, 3 0-1; 1, 2, 3 +Legs 2 & 3 0-0 1-0 1-0; 3, 1, 4 0-1; 2, 1, 3 +Leg 4 0-0 1-0 1-0; 2, 1, 4 0-1; 1, 2, 2 + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 22B +) expanded, lobate, extending beyond posterior margin of abdomen, armed with 5 naked setae on rounded apex. Leg 6 absent. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Unfortunately, the +two specimens +available in this study were damaged, both with a crushed metasome. Therefore the precise body form and size are unknowable, but all the cephalic appendages and the swimming legs remained virtually intact. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFCCFFDEFA93FC99D7BC1B5E.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFCCFFDEFA93FC99D7BC1B5E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..81c53d70a7f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFCCFFDEFA93FC99D7BC1B5E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Buprorides + +gen. nov. + + + + + + +Diagnosis +(female). Cephalosome depressed, subcircular, well-defined from trunk somites by constriction. Urosome wider than long, with small rounded abdomen; caudal rami absent. Rostrum present. Antennule 5-segmented; first segment with 2 setae. Antenna 3-segmented, with 1, 4, and 6 setae on first to third segments, respectively. Labrum broad. Mandible consisting of coxa and 1-segmented palp; coxa with well-developed gnathobase; palp armed with 3 setae distally. Maxillule bilobed; inner lobe (precoxa) with spinulose spines on medial margin; outer lobe (palp) narrower than inner lobe, armed with 4 setae. Maxilla consisting of syncoxa and allobasis; syncoxa broad, with single large mediodistal endite tipped with 2 elements; allobasis with several setae. Maxilliped plate-like, unarmed. Legs 1-4 biramous with 2-segmented rami, armed only with setae; coxa lacking inner seta; intercoxal sclerite not discernible. Basis of leg 1 lacking inner distal element. Leg 5 expanded, lobate, extending over posterior margin of abdomen, armed with 5 naked setae distally. + + + + + +Type +species. + +Buprçrẚdes trẚlçbatus +gen. et sp. nov. +by original designation. + + + + +Etymology. +The new genus is named after +Buprçrus +, the +type +genus of the family, and the suffix - +ẚdes +. Gender masculine. + + + + +Remarks. +In all three species of +Buprçrus +, the maxilliped is armed with 4 setae and legs 1-4 have single-segmented endopods. +Buprçrẚdes +gen. nov. +can be distinguished from +Buprçrus +, because the maxilliped is unarmed and legs 1-4 have 2-segmented endopods. There are other notable differences between the genera, such as, the possession of 3 setae on the mandibular palp in +Buprçrẚdes +gen. nov. +compared with 1 or 2 setae in +Buprçrus +, and the presence of 6 slender setae on the terminal segment of the antenna rather than 5 setae (some spiniform) in +BuprçrusK + + +The +type +species of +Buprçrẚdes +gen. nov. +and +Buprçrus nçrdgaardẚ +are associated with compound ascidians, but the other two species of +Buprçrus +are associated with solitary ascidians. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFCDFFDEFA93F9D6D6D41FBE.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFCDFFDEFA93F9D6D6D41FBE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c1eced312b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFCDFFDEFA93F9D6D6D41FBE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + +Family + +Buproridae +Thorell, 1859 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis +(female). Body stout, consisting of distinct cephalosome and extremely inflated trunk. Rostrum with rounded apex. Abdomen extremely reduced to short lobe; caudal rami absent. Antennule 3- to 7-segmented; first segment bearing 2 setae. Antenna 3-segmented, with armature formula 1, 4, and 5 or 6. Labrum distinct. Mandible consisting of coxa with well-developed gnathobase and palp with 1 to 3 distal setae, or palp represented by seta. Maxillule consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa with 6 or 7 spiniform setae on arthrite; palp unsegmented with 4 or 5 setae. Maxilla consisting of syncoxa with 1 large endite tipped with 2 elements, and allobasis with 4 or 5 elements. Maxilliped unsegmented, unarmed or armed with 4 setae. Legs 1-4 biramous with 2-segmented exopods; endopods 1-segmented in +Buprçrus +and 2-segmented in +Buprçrẚdes +gen. nov. +; coxa unarmed; basis of leg 1 with or without inner distal element. Leg 5 unsegmented, extending beyond posterior margin of abdomen and armed distally with several setae. + + + + +Remarks. +The family +Buproridae +was established by +Thorell (1859) +to accommodate his new monotypic genus, +Buprçrus +Thorell, 1859 +. However, in their comprehensive revision of the family +Ascidicolidae, Illg +& + +Dudley +(1980) + +accorded this taxon subfamily status, as the Buprorinae. They considered that the antenna of all the other subfamilies within the ascidicolid series could be derived from a limb exhibiting the basic structure of the antenna in +Buprçrus +(Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +). +Marchenkov & Boxshall (2002) +compared the antennal segmentation patterns across all subfamilies of +Ascidicolidae +and showed that the ancestral first and second endopodal segments of the antenna are fused in +Buprçrus +and the third endopodal segment is free, and that the main flexure plane of the limb lies between the basis and endopod. In contrast, in all of the other subfamilies the third endopodal segment is fused with the second and the main flexure plane of the limb lies between the ancestral first and second endopodal segments. Based primarily on this difference, +Marchenkov & Boxshall (2002) +treated the +Buproridae +as a family level taxon. + + +Until the present account, the +Buproridae +remained a monotypic family represented only by the genus +Buprçrus +. The genus +Buprçrus +currently consists of three species: +B +. +lçvenẚ +Thorell, 1859 +known from Scandinavian waters and from off +Mauritania +in the eastern North Atlantic ( +Thorell, 1859 +; +Marchenkov & Boxshall, 2002 +) and from the Atlantic coast of America in the western North Atlantic (Dudley & Illg, 1991), +B +. +nçrdgaardẚ +G.O. +Sars, 1921 +known from +Norway +( +Sars, 1921 +), and +B +. +caudatus +Illg & +Dudley, 1980 +known from southern California on the Pacific coast of America (Illg & +Dudley, 1980 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFD2FFCCFA93FBFCD5E11EF4.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFD2FFCCFA93FBFCD5E11EF4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9bd3da0d996 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFD2FFCCFA93FBFCD5E11EF4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,277 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus longipes + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 30-32 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1957) and +1 ♀ +paratype +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17366) from +mçlyclẚnum saturnẚum +Savigny, 1816 (MNHN-IT-2008-7031 = +MNHN +A1 +/ +POL +.B/24); +Red Sea +, +Joussaume +coll. + + + +Additional material. + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-17367, dissected) in +mçlyclẚnum macrçphyllum +Michaelsen +, 1919; +New Caledonia +, outer +Reef +, +Stn NC +24, depth + +38 m + +, +Monniot +coll., + +19 September 1985 + + +. + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species refers to its elongate leg 5. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 30A +) slender, symmetrical, divisible into broader anterior part comprising cephalosome and first to fifth pedigerous somites, and narrower posterior part comprising genital somite and 7 abdominal annulations ( +Fig. 30B +). Body length +1.35 mm +; width 335 μm across second pedigerous somite. Cephalo- some and first to fourth pedigerous somites defined only by weak constrictions and faint dorsal suture lines. Genital somite 76×164 μm; genital aperture positioned dorsally. Abdomen gradually narrowing posteriorly; 6 anterior ab- dominal annulations nearly equal in length, much wider than long; seventh (anal somite) 85×84 μm, bearing pair of large tubercles (indicated by arrowhead in +Fig. 30C +) posteroventrally. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 30C +) 37×29 μm, armed with 4 strong claws and 2 setae; claws pointed at tip and articulated at base. + + +Rostrum as anterior process of cephalosome, with truncate anterior margin ( +Fig. 30A +). Antennule ( +Fig. 30D +) short, 5-segmented; first and second segments distinctly broader than distal segments, curved through right angle between first segment and remaining part; armature formula 10, 4, 3, 4, and 7+aesthetasc. Right antenna ( +Fig. 30E +) 3-segmented, consisting of coxa, basis, and unsegmented endopod, but endopod bearing trace of articulation proximally on one surface; coxa and basis unarmed; endopod 71×23 μm, armed with 8 elements consisting of 2 slender proximal setae and 1 spinulose distal spine on inner margin, 1 small innermost distal spine, 2 inner distal spines, and 2 slender outer distal setae; all elements except distal spine on inner margin bluntly tipped; 4 outer distal elements bearing fine spinules distally. Left antenna different from right antenna in having 5 unornamented distal setae, of which 2 outer setae distinctly longer than those of right antenna. + + + +FIG. 30. +Bçtryllçphẚlus lçngẚpes +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, posterior part of body, dorsal; C, left caudal ramus, ventral; D, antennule; E, right antenna; F, labrum; G, mandible; H, maxillule; I, maxilliped. Scale bars: A, B, 0.1 mm; C, F-I, 0.02 mm; D, E, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 31. +Bçtryllçphẚlus lçngẚpes +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilla; B, right leg 1; C, left leg 1; D, right leg 2; E, left leg 2; F, right leg 3; G, left leg 3. Scale bars: A, 0.02 mm; B-G, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 32. +Bçtryllçphẚlus lçngẚpes +sp. nov. +, female. A, right leg 4; B, left leg 4; C, leg 5; D, right genital aperture, dorsal. Scale bars: A-C, 0.05 mm; D, 0.02 mm. + + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 30F +) strongly tapering, consisting of well-sclerotized proximal part and narrower, fleshy distal part. Mandible ( +Fig. 30G +) bearing 2 teeth on coxal gnathobase and 8 setae on palp arranged as 3, 1, 2, and 2; 1 subdistal seta naked, all others pinnate. Maxillule ( +Fig. 30H +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa bearing 5 distinct setae and 1 minute seta on arthrite; palp consisting of coxa, basis, and endopod; coxa with small naked seta on epipodite; basis with 2 setae on medial margin (distal seta expanded at base), and 3 setae on outer margin; endopod incompletely articulated from basis, armed with 3 setae distally. Maxilla ( +Fig. 31A +) obscurely segmented, armed with 8 setae; 5 medial setae bearing setules (or fine spinules) along their distal margin; 3 distal setae consisting of 2 smaller naked setae and 1 outer pinnate seta. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 30I +) 4-segmented; syncoxa (first segment) unarmed but ornamented with 2 rows of spinules on outer side and 1 row of minute spinules on inner distal surface; basis tapering distally, bearing 2 small setae and 1 longitudinal row of spinules in distal region; first endopodal segment much wider than long, unarmed; second endopodal segment about 2.5 times longer than wide, bearing 1 small seta on inner margin and 1 tooth-like process at inner distal corner; terminal claw smooth, slightly shorter than second endopodal segment. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 31 +B-G, 32A, B) biramous with 1-segmented exopods and 2-segmented endopods; coxa lacking inner seta; basis with small outer seta and row of minute spinules at inner distal corner. First endopodal segment of right legs 3 ( +Fig. 31F +) and 4 ( +Fig. 32A +) characteristically bearing elongate spine. Spines on rami of legs 1-4 usually bluntly tipped, with membranous cap at tip. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on right and left legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1VII1; 771; 7
Leg 2VI1; 851; 8
Leg 3VII; 651; 6
Leg 4VII; 551; 5
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 32C +) elongate, tapering, directed posterolaterally ( +Fig. 30A +), about 3 times longer than wide (203×67 μm); armed with 4 setae; proximal and subdistal setae positioned at 22% and 75% of length of leg, respectively. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 32D +) represented by 2 small spines and 1 dentiform process on genial operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Two outstanding feature of +B +. +lçngẚpes +sp. nov. +serve to differentiate it from all of its congeners: 1) the transformation of the seta on the first endopodal segment of right legs 3 and 4 into a spine, and 2) the presence of the pair of large ventrodistal tubercles on the anal somite. As additional diagnostic features of +B +. +lçngẚpes +sp. nov. +, the free abdomen comprises 7 well defined annulations and the antenna is armed with 8 setal elements. The latter combination of features is shared with +B +. +aspẚnçsus +, +B +. +symmetrẚcus +, and one variety of +B +. +ruber +. But +B +. +lçngẚpes +sp. nov. +is readily distinguishable from these three congeners by the above-mentioned outstanding features and by having a different leg setation pattern; for example, the number of setae on the exopod of left leg 2 is 5, rather than 6 as in these three congeners. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFD6FFC0FA93FB4BD6861958.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFD6FFC0FA93FB4BD6861958.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..079280dbd97 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFD6FFC0FA93FB4BD6861958.xml @@ -0,0 +1,317 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus bermudensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 27-29 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1953), +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(intact, MNHN-IU-2018-1954), and +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17364) from +aẚstaplẚa bermudensẚs +Van Name +, 1902; +Bermuda +, +Monniot +coll., + +March to May 1970 + +. + + + +Additional material. +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1955), +1 ♀ +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17365) and + +1 ♀ +(MNHN- IU-2018-1956), all from +a +. +bermudensẚs +; +Bermuda + +. + + + + +Etymology. +The new species is named after the +type +locality, +Bermuda +. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 27A, B +) stout, divisible into broader anterior and narrower posterior parts. Body length +1.04 mm +; maximum width 382 μm. Anterior part consisting of cephalosome and first to fifth pediger- ous somites; each somite well-defined by dorsal and lateral constrictions; first to fourth pedigerous somites each bearing weak dorsal tergite. Posterior part of body comprising genital somite and abdomen consisting of 7 annulations ( +Fig. 27C +). Genital somite 100×228 μm; genital apertures positioned dorsally. First to sixth abdominal annula- tions much shorter than wide; seventh (anal somite) 70×113 μm, ornamented with scattered fine spinules ventrally. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 27D +) about 1.7 times longer than wide, armed with 4 claws and 2 setae; outer distal claw bluntly tipped. Spermatophore ( +Fig. 27E +) attached to female 140×52 μm, bulbous. + + +Rostrum absent but pair of comb-like membranes present on ventral surface of rostral area ( +Fig. 27F +). Antennule ( +Fig. 27G +) 172 μm long, 5-segmented; proximal 2 segments distinctly broadened; armature formula 10 (5 large and 5 small), 4 (3 large and 1 small), 2 (1 large and 1 small), 4, and 6+aesthetasc. Left antenna ( +Fig. 27H +) 4-segmented; coxa, basis and first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment 3.2 times longer than wide (80×25 μm), armed with 6 setae and 1 spine (including 2 setae and 1 spine on inner margin). Right antenna differing slightly from left antenna in bearing 2 slightly shorter outer distal setae. All elements on antenna naked. + + + +FIG. 27. +Bçtryllçphẚlus bermudensẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, posterior part of body from fifth pedigerous somite, dorsal; D, caudal ramus; E, spermatophore; F, rostral area; G, antennule; H, antenna; I, labrum; J, mandible. Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm; D, 0.02 mm; E-J, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 28 +. +Bçtryllçphẚlus bermudensẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxillule; B, maxilla; C, maxilliped; D, right leg 1; E, left leg 1; F, right leg 2; G, left leg 2; H, leg 5. Scale bars: A, B, 0.02 mm; C-H, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 29. +Bçtryllçphẚlus bermudensẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, right leg 3; B; left leg 3; C, right leg 4; D, left leg 4. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. + + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 27I +) simple, unornamented, consisting of thick-walled proximal part and thin-walled, convex distal part. Mandible ( +Fig. 27J +) consisting of coxa and palp; coxa with 3 teeth on gnathobase, distal tooth spiniform, bearing minute spinules along proximal margin; palp elongate, armed with 9 setae arranged as 3, 2 (smaller one naked), 2 (including one naked), and 2; outer margin bearing small tubercle near base of proximalmost seta. Maxillule ( +Fig. 28A +) consisting of precoxa and palp: precoxa with 5 distinct setae (second proximal seta bluntly tipped) and 1 minute seta on arthrite: palp 2-segmented; coxobasis with 2 setae on medial margin, 1 small seta on epipodite, 3 setae on outer margin, and 1 tubercle distally; endopod clearly defined from basis, with 3 setae on distal margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 28B +) obscurely 2-segmented, with 10 setae, including minute distal seta. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 28C +) 4-segmented; first segment (syncoxa) broad, lacking seta, but with 1 inner, semicircular tubercle bearing row of minute spinules distally; second segment (basis) as long as wide, bearing 2 small setae subdistally and row of minute spinules at inner distal corner; third and fourth segments (first and second endopodal segments) small and unarmed; terminal claw small, bearing 2 minute denticles (proximal and subdistal) on concave inner margin. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 28 +D-G, 29A-D) biramous, without inner seta on coxa; basis with outer seta and spinulose inner distal tubercle. Right and left leg 1 with 1-segmented exopod, but all rami of other swimming legs 2-segmented, although articulation incomplete between exopodal segments of left legs 2 and 3. Second exopodal segment of left legs bearing prominent tooth-like processes along outer margin; inner subdistal seta on this segment minute ( +Figs. 28E, G +, +29B, D +). Outer distal seta on second endopodal segment of legs 3 and 4 also minute. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on right and left legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1VII1; 771; 7
Leg 2I; V1; 81; 51; 8
Leg 3I; V1; 51; 51; 6
Leg 4I; V1; 51; 51; 5
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 28H +) positioned dorsolaterally ( +Fig. 27C +), about 2.6 times longer than wide, tapering, curved inwards, extending to middle of genital somite; armed with 4 setae (1 proximal, 1 subdistal, and 2 distal). Leg 6 represented by 2 small denticles on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The female of +BK bermudensẚs +sp. nov. +possesses an abdomen consisting of 7 annulations and this feature is shared with four previously described species: +B +. +aspẚnçsus +, +B +. +randallẚ +Stock, 1970 +, +B +. +cçnẚcus +Conradi, López- González & García-Gómez, 1994, and +B +. +symmetrẚcus +Ooishi, 2014. The abdomen of +BK ruber +may be variable in apparent segmentation, exhibiting between 6 and 8 annulations ( +Ooishi, 1999 +). Two of these five species, +B +. +randallẚ +and +B +. +cçnẚcus +, are known to have 7 armature elements on the terminal segment of the antenna ( +Stock, 1970 +; +Conradi et al., 1994 +), as in +B +. +bermudensẚs +sp. nov. +They may be differentiated from the new species by the different setation of legs, because the right endopod of leg 2 of +B +. +bermudensẚs +sp. nov. +is armed with 9 setae, compared to +7 in +B +. +randallẚ +and +8 in +B +. +cçnẚcus +, and the left endopod of leg 1 of +B +. +bermudensẚs +sp. nov. +is armed with 8 setae, compared to +7 in +B +. +randallẚ +and +B +. +cçnẚcus +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFDAFFB5FA93FF10D6DD1B94.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFDAFFB5FA93FF10D6DD1B94.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..27e80ecd457 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFDAFFB5FA93FF10D6DD1B94.xml @@ -0,0 +1,258 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus guadeloupensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 36-38 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1959), +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(intact, MNHN-IU-2018-1960), and +2 ♀♀ +paratypes +(dissected, MNHN-IU-2014-17368) from +ieptçclẚnẚdes latus +Monniot F. +, 1983; +Guadeloupe +Stn +83-13, +SE of Îlet Fajou +, near +Passe +à +Colas +, depth + +5-20 m + +, +Monniot +coll., + +29 March 1983 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is taken from its +type +locality, +Guadeloupe +. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 36A +) small, rather stout, nearly symmetrical; body length 797 μm in largest specimen (dissected), 718 μm in smallest specimen. Broader anterior part of body occupying about 65% of body length, consisting of cephalosome and first to fifth pedigerous somites: first to fourth pedigerous somites each with weakly developed dorsal tergite. Narrower posterior part ( +Fig. 36B +) consisting of genital somite and 7 abdominal annulations (8-annulate abdomen observed in 1 of +5 specimens +). Genital somite much wider than long (68×159 μm); genital apertures positioned dorsally. Abdomen gradually narrowing distally: first to sixth abdominal annula- tions short, 128 μm long in total. Last annulation (anal somite) ( +Fig. 36C +) wider than long (68×82 μm), ornamented with 2 horizontal rows of minute spinules on proximal part of ventral surface. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 36D +) slightly longer than wide (36×30 μm), armed with 4 claws and 2 setae; outermost claw bluntly tipped and weakly sclerotized. + + +Rostrum as simple frontal lobe on cephalosome. Antennule short, 4-segmented; armature formula 10, 4, 2, and 11+aesthetasc; terminal segment subdivided by incomplete posterior suture line into proximal region bearing 4 setae and distal region bearing 7 setae plus 1 aesthetasc. Right antenna ( +Fig. 36F +) 3-segmented, consisting of coxa, basis, and 1-segmented endopod; endopod about 4 times longer than wide (64×16 μm), armed with 8 elements consisting of 2 proximal setae plus 1 distal spine on inner margin and 5 unequal setae on distal margin, innermost seta on distal margin minute, setule-like. Left antenna differing from right antenna in having 2 longer outer setae on distal margin of endopodal segment. + + +Labrum weak, easily destroyed. Mandible ( +Fig. 36G +) bearing 3 teeth on coxal gnathobase; palp as usual for genus, bearing 9 setae arranged as 3, 2, 2, and 2. Maxillule ( +Fig. 36H +) with 5 distinct setae and 1 minute seta on arthrite of precoxa; coxobasis with 2 setae (both with swollen base) on medial margin, 3 setae on outer margin, 1 naked seta at outer proximal corner, and 1 tapering process in outer distal region; endopod distinctly defined from basis and armed with 3 setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 36I +) indistinctly 2-segmented, with 10 setae. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 37A +) 4-segmented; syncoxa unarmed and unornamented; basis with 2 small, equal setae and 1 row of minute spinules subdistally; first endopodal segment short and unarmed; second endopodal segment about 1.8 times longer than wide, bearing small seta distally on inner margin; terminal claw as long as second endopodal segment, bearing 2 tooth-like processes, 1 proximally and 1 subdistally on inner margin. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 37 +B-E, 38A-D) biramous, asymmetrical. In left leg 4 ( +Fig. 38D +) protopod divided into coxa and basis, but in other legs coxa and basis fused to form unsegmented protopod bearing 1 seta on outer margin and row of spinules at inner distal corner. Exopods 1-segmented in right and left legs 1 and 2, but 2-segmented in endopods and in both rami of legs 3 and 4. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on right and left legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1VI1; 751; 7
Leg 2VI1; 851; 8
Leg 3I; V1; 61; 41; 6
Leg 4I; V1; 51; 41; 5
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 38E +) large, extending beyond posterior margin of genital somite, about 2.4 times longer than wide (160×67 μm), evenly tapering, armed with 4 setae. Leg 6 represented by 2 small spinules and 1 spinule-like process on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +FIG. 36. +Bçtryllçphẚlus guadelçupensẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, right; B, posterior part of body, dorsal; C, posterior part of abdomen, ventral; D, caudal ramus; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, mandible; H, maxillule; I, maxilla. Scale bars: A, 0.1 mm; B, C, 0.05 mm; D-I, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 37. +Bçtryllçphẚlus guadelçupensẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilliped; B, right leg 1; C, left leg 1; D, right leg 2; E, left leg 2. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 38. +Bçtryllçphẚlus guadelçupensẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, right leg 3; B, left leg 3; C, right leg 4; D, left leg 4; E, leg 5. Scale bars: A-D, 0.02 mm; E, 0.05 mm. + + + + +Remarks. +In +B +. +guadelçupensẚs +sp. nov. +the exopods of right legs 1-4 are armed with 6 spines whereas the exopods of left legs 1-4 are armed with 5 setae. This characteristic leg setation is unique within +Bçtryllçphẚlus +and typifies the new species. The 3-segmented condition of the antenna (with a 1-segmented endopod) is also a significant feature of +B +. +guadelçupensẚs +sp. nov. +, because it is shared only with +B +. +nçrvegẚcus +(see +Ooishi, 1996 +) and +B +. +lçngẚpes +sp. nov +., although the latter two species are not similar to +B +. +guadelçupensẚs +sp. nov. +in female body form, or in the setation patterns of the antenna and swimming legs. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFDEFFC9FA93FC4BD7631A82.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFDEFFC9FA93FC4BD7631A82.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9d97cbe839a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFDEFFC9FA93FC4BD7631A82.xml @@ -0,0 +1,260 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Botryllophilus antarcticus + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( + +Figs. 33- +35 + +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1958, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +Aplẚdẚum falklandẚcum +Millar, 1960 (MNHN-IT-2008-386 = +MNHN +A1 +/ +APL +.B/532); Antarctic, Terre Adélie, CEAMARC cruise, +RV +“Aurore Australis”, Stn 18EV479 ( +66º10’S +, +139º41’E +), depth + +402-437 m + +, IPEV-AAD-MNHN coll., + +15 January 2008 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is based on its +type +locality, the Antarctic. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 33A +) fleshy with thin exoskeleton; length +1.58 mm +. Anterior part of body unsegmented; cephalosome recognizable from metasome only by faint dorsal constriction. Narrower posterior part ( +Fig. 33B +) comprising genital somite and abdomen consisting of 5 indistinct annulations. Genital somite 170×250 μm, obscurely defined from fifth pedigerous somite; genital apertures positioned dorsolaterally. Abdomen gradu- ally narrowing posteriorly; first to fourth abdominal annulations subequal in length; fifth (anal somite) 77×115 μm, distinctly wider than long. Caudal rami divergent; each ramus ( +Fig. 33C +) about 1.4 times longer than wide (54×38 μm), armed with 4 claws and 2 setae; all caudal claws pointed at tip, longest claw straight, 48 μm long, as long as caudal ramus. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 33D +) stout, 195 μm long, 4-segmented, but terminal segment subdivided by incomplete suture on one surface; first and second segments expanded, incompletely articulated from each other; armature formula 9, 5, 2, and 11+aesthetasc; all setae naked. Antenna ( +Fig. 33E, F +) 4-segmented; coxa, basis, and first endopodal segment unarmed; second endopodal segment 4.7 times longer than wide, armed with 3 spines on inner margin and 5 setae on distal margin. No difference recognizable between right and left antennae. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 33G +) simple, nearly semicircular. Mandible ( +Fig. 33H +) with 3 teeth on coxal gnathobase; palp with 9 setae, grouped as 3, 2, 2, and 2. Maxillule ( +Fig. 33I +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa with 6 setae on arthrite, minute second distal seta lobate and tipped with setule; palp with 2 setae on medial margin, 3 setae on outer margin, and 1 minute naked seta at outer proximal corner (representing epipodite); endopod not articulated at base, armed with 3 setae on distal margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 33J +) obscurely segmented, armed with 10 setae (4 small and naked). Maxilliped ( +Fig. 33K +) stout, 4-segmented; syncoxa (first segment) unarmed but with 3 transverse rows of fine spinules; basis (second segment) with 2 unequal setae and 1 transverse row of fine spinules subdistally; first endopodal segment short and unarmed; second endopodal segment about twice as long as wide, armed with 2 small setae subdistally and 1 denticle at inner distal corner; terminal claw about 0.65 times as long as second endopodal segment, bearing 1 denticle subdistally on concave margin. + + + +FIG. 33. +Bçtryllçphẚlus antarctẚcus +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, right; B, posterior part of body, ventral; C, caudal ramus; D, antennule; E, left antenna; F, second endopodal segment of right antenna; G, labrum; H, mandible; I, maxillule, with inset showing modified seta on precoxa; J, maxilla; K, maxilliped. Scale bars: A, 0.2 mm; B, 0.1 mm; C, G, I-K, 0.02 mm; D-F, H, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 34. +Bçtryllçphẚlus antarctẚcus +sp. nov. +, female. A, right leg 1; B, left leg 1; C, right leg 2; D, left leg 2; E, right leg 3; F, left leg 3; G, leg 5; H, leg 6. Scale bars: A-F, H, 0.02 mm; G, 0.1 mm. + + + + +FIG. 35. +Bçtryllçphẚlus antarctẚcus +sp. nov. +, female. A, right leg 4; B, left leg 4. Scale bars: 0.02 mm. + + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Figs. 34 +A-F, 35A, B) biramous, asymmetrical in setation between left and right legs; coxa unarmed: basis with outer seta and 2 or 3 rows of minute spinules on inner side of anterior surface. Exopods of legs 1 and 2 unsegmented, but other rami of swimming legs 2-segmented. Exopods of left legs 1 and 2 ( +Fig. 34B, D +) characteristically with mixture of spines and setae (as figured). Second endopodal segment of right leg 2 ( +Fig. 34C +) and left leg 3 ( +Fig. 34F +) bearing 1 small spine in addition to setae. One seta on second exopodal and endopodal segments of left leg 4 ( +Fig. 35B +) remarkably reduced in size. Almost all setae on legs 1-4 naked. Numbers of spines (Roman numerals) and setae (Arabic numerals) on rami of right and left legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Right exopodRight endopodLeft exopodLeft endopod
Leg 1VI1; 7IV+21; 6
Leg 2V1; I+7III+21; 7
Leg 3I; V1; 51; 41; I+5
Leg 4I; V1; 41; 51; 5
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 34G +) evenly tapering, about 1.5 times longer than wide (163×108 μm); armed with 4 setae. Leg 6 + + +( +Fig. 34H +) represented by 2 spinules and 1 prominent spiniform process on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown + + + + +Remarks. +In legs 1-4 of +Bçtryllçphẚlus +species the exopods of the right legs are typically armed only with spines whereas the exopods of the left legs are typically armed only with setae. One exception to this generalisation is +B +. +macrçpus +, in which the right and left legs are symmetrical and the exopods of both right and left legs 1 and 2 are armed with mixture of spines and setae. +Bçtryllçphẚlus antarctẚcus +sp. nov. +is another species bearing a mixture of spines and setae on the exopods of legs 1 and 2, although it differs from +B +. +macrçpus +in the precise armature formula for the swimming legs and in other respects. Other unique features of +B +. +antarctẚcus +sp. nov. +include the abdomen consisting of 5 annulations, and the combination of the armature on the exopods and endopods of right legs 1-4 which are 6-5-6-6 and 8-9-6-5, respectively. These unique features clearly differentiate +B +. +antarctẚcus +sp. nov. +from its congeners, and support the establishment of the new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFE0FFF2FA93FF58D7B81B5F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFE0FFF2FA93FF58D7B81B5F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..af0c94b1de2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFE0FFF2FA93FF58D7B81B5F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + +Family + +Ascidicolidae +Thorell, 1859 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis +(female). Body cylindrical. Prosome 5-segmented, consisting of cephalosome and 4-segmented metasome. Urosome 5- or 6-segmented, with 3- or 4-segmented abdomen. Fifth pedigerous somite obscurely defined. Caudal rami usually small, armed with 5 or 6 setae. Rostrum not developed. Antennule small, 5- to 8-segmented; aesthetascs small. Antenna consisting of coxobasis and 2-segmented endopod, or 4-segmented including obscurely defined coxa, basis bearing 1 spine distally; distinct flexure present between basis and first endopodal segment; second endopodal segment bearing terminal claw. Labrum broad, bearing 1 or 2 dentiform processes at posterolateral corners. Mandible consisting of coxa and palp; coxa with well-developed gnathobase bearing irregular denticles on medial margin; palp uniramous, or biramous with well-defined basis, exopod and endopod. Maxillule consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa bearing 7 to 9 setal elements on arthrite; palp uniramous or biramous; coxal endite present or absent. Maxilla 2- to 4-segmented; syncoxa (first segment) with 2 endites each bearing 1 seta, or 1 endite bearing 2 or 3 setae, or endites absent; basis with strong claw in addition to setae, or with setae only; endopod reduced, 1- or 2-segmented; in +Ascẚdẚcçla +and +Styelẚcçla +basis and endopod completely fused to form allobasis. Maxilliped unsegmented and unarmed, or armed with 1 to 7 setae. Legs 1-4 broad, biramous; coxa usually lacking inner seta; basis of leg 1 with or without inner distal spine; exopods 2-segmented; endopods mostly 2-segmented. First endopodal segment of legs 1 and 2 always lacking inner seta. Exopods and endopods of legs 1-4 usually armed with spines only. Leg 5 large, lamellate, bearing rudimentary setae, or consisting of lamellate protopod bearing outer distal seta and setiferous exopod. Leg 6 represented by 3 dentiform processes on genital operculum. + + + + +Remarks. +Thorell (1859) +first established the +Ascidicolinae +as a subfamily of the family +Notodelphyidae +in order to accommodate his new genus +Ascẚdẚcçla +Thorell, 1859 +. As highlighted by Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +, it was treated both as a subfamily and as a family level taxon throughout the late nineteenth and the twentieth centuries. Its composition has varied over this period but it gradually expanded until it contained a total of seven main component taxa, each of which was recognized as a subfamily of the family +Ascidicolidae +by Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +in their comprehensive revision. The seven subfamilies were: the +Ascidicolinae +, Buprorinae +Thorell, 1859 +, Botryllophylinae +Sars, 1921 +, +Enterocolinae Della Valle, 1883 +, Enterognathinae Illg & + +Dudley +, 1980 + +, Enteropsinae +Aurivillius, 1885 +, and +Haplostominae Chatton & Harant, 1924 +. The +Enterognathidae +was treated as a separate family by +Boxshall & Halsey (2004) +and +Ohtsuka et al. (2010) +, and comprises associates of echinoderm and hemichordate hosts. It is not considered further here. Subsequent revision of the remaining six subfamilies resulted in the recognition of four valid family level taxa (see +Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 +). + + +Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +retained only two genera, +Ascẚdẚcçla +and +Styelẚcçla +Lützen, 1968 +, in their subfamily +Ascidicolinae +which was subsequently returned to family status, as the +Ascidicolidae +by +Boxshall & Halsey (2004) +. Two new genera +eamẚstyelẚcçla +gen. nov. +and + +Bathycçpçla + + +gen. nov. + +are added to the family in the present work. All species currently placed in this family were found living in association with solitary ascidians. + + +In the genera +Styelẚcçla +, +eamẚstyelẚcçla +gen. nov. +and + +Bathycçpçla + + +gen. nov. + +, leg 5 consists of a lamellate protopod and a small, setiferous distal segment. This distal segment was recognized as the endopod by +Lützen (1968) +and by Illg & + +Dudley +(1980) + +, but +Boxshall & Halsey (2004) +re-interpreted it as representing the exopod. The four genera of the +Ascidicolidae +are distinguishable using the following key. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFE3FFFFFA93FA6ED66D1B7B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFE3FFFFFA93FA6ED66D1B7B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1b21e5246b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFE3FFFFFA93FA6ED66D1B7B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,391 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Ascidicola rosea +Thorell, 1859 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 1 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1924) from +Ascẚdẚa mentula +Müller, 1776; Kristineberg, +Sweden +, +Monniot +coll., 1962 + +. + +2 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1925) from +Ascẚdẚa çblẚqua +Alder, 1863; +Kristineberg +, +Sweden +, +Monniot +coll., 1962 + +; + +2 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1926) from +AK çblẚqua +Kristineberg +, +Sweden +, +Monniot +coll., 1962 + +. + +3 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1927) from +Ascẚdẚella aspersa +(Müller, 1776), Banyuls, Mediterranean coast of +France + +; + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1928) from +AK aspersa +, North Sea ( +56°39.9’N +, +01°10.1’W +), depth +89 m + +; + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU- 2018-1929) from +AK aspersa +, Mediterranean Sea off +Corsica +, MEDITS 2016 cruise, +RV +“L’Europe”, +Stn M +16-2 ( +43°20.98´N +, +4°19.64´E +), depth +32-33 m +, +31 May 2016 + +. + +2 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1930) from +Ascẚdẚella scabra +(Müller, 1776); Kristineberg, +Sweden +, +Monniot +coll., 1962. + + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1931) from +Cçrella eumyçta +Traustedt, 1882; Port Le Havre, Atlantic coast of +France +, collected by +G. Breton +, 2008 + +. + +2 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1932) from +Cçrella parallelçgramma +(Müller, 1776); Kristineberg, +Sweden +, +Monniot +coll. + +, 1962. +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1933) from +eerdmanẚa mçmus +(Savigny, 1816); Red Sea, collected in 19 +th +Century. + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1934) from +Mẚcrçcçsmus claudẚcans +(Savigny, 1816); Roscoff, Atlantic coast of +France +, +Monniot +coll. + + +8 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1935) from +Mẚcrçcçsmus sabatẚerẚ +Roule, 1885; +Banyuls +, +Mediterranean +coast of +France + +; + +25 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1936) ( +1 ♀ +dissected and figured) from + +MK +sabatẚerẚ + +; +Banyuls +, +Mediterranean +coast of +France + +. + +8 ♀♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1937) from +Mẚcrçcçsmus vulgarẚs +Heller +, 1877; +Banyuls +, +Mediterranean +coast of +France + +; + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1938) from + +MK +vulgarẚs + +; +Naples +, +Italy + +. + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1939) from +mhallusẚa mammẚllata +(Cuvier, 1815); +Banyuls +, +Mediterranean +coast of +France + +. +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1940) from +Styela cançpus +(Savigny, 1816); Mediterranean Sea, Île Grosse, Banyuls, collected by trawl. + + + + +FIG +. +1. +Ascẚdẚcçla rçsea +Thorell, 1859 +, female. A, mandible; B, maxilla; C, leg 1; D, leg 2; E, leg 3; F, leg 4. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. + + + + +Supplementary description of female. +Body length 3.70 mm. Ventral spinose pad between 2 last abdominal somites variously developed, sometimes absent. Caudal ramus about 3.9 times longer than wide (236×60 μm); armed with 5 setae (1 lateral and 4 distal), lateral seta positioned at 42% of ramus length. Antennule, antenna, maxillule, and maxilliped as described by +Ooishi (2007a) +. Mandible ( +Fig. 1A +) consisting of coxa and reduced palp; palp 1-segmented, but articulated from unarmed, pedestal-like extension of coxa; free segment of palp armed with 5 setae. Maxilla ( +Fig. 1B +) consisting of syncoxa and allobasis; syncoxa bearing 1 endite tipped with 2 setae; proximal seta on endite not articulated at base; allobasis with unarmed inner margin, terminating in claw-like process; armed with 1 spine on anterior surface plus 6 setae (4 proximal and 2 sub-proximal) on outer (ventral) margin;. Leg 6 represented by 2 small setae and 4 small teeth on genital operculum. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-0;1-I +I-0; +III +, I, +III + +0-0; 0, +III +, 1 +
Leg 20-01-0 +I-0; +III +, I, +III + +0-0; I, +III +, 3 +
Leg 30-01-0 +I-0; +II +, I, +III + +0-1; I, +III +, 3 +
Leg 40-01-0 +I-0; +II +, I, +III + +0-1; 0, +III +, 2 +
+ + + +Remarks +. +Ooishi (2007a) +thoroughly redescribed +Ascẚdẚcçla rçsea +. This distinctive species occurs widely in the North and South Atlantic and along the Pacific coast of North America ( +Boxshall & Halsey, 2004 +). +Boxshall & Halsey (2004) +listed 25 species of solitary ascidians previously recorded as hosts of +AK rçsea +. +Ooishi (2007a) +recorded an additional species, +Ascẚdẚa mentula +, as host of this copepod, and here we add three more new host species: +Ascẚdẚella scabra +from the Swedish coast, +Styela cançpus +from the Mediterranean, and +eerdmanẚa mçmus +from the Red Sea. Our observations of the +A +. +rçsea +material listed above revealed a constant armature formula for legs 1-4; no variation was noted either with host or with locality. The identification of all the above specimens was confirmed by +ẚn sẚtu +observation of the leg armature. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFEBFFE5FA93F995D63A1DA7.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFEBFFE5FA93F995D63A1DA7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..62a73284336 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFEBFFE5FA93F995D63A1DA7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,253 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Ascidicola antarctica + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 6 +, +7 +) + + + + +Type material. +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1942, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +Cçrella antarctẚca +Sluiter, 1905; Antarctic Ocean, Eltanin cruise 12, Stn 1078 ( +61°26´S +, +41°55.4´W +), depth 604 m, +12 April 1964 +. + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species refers to its distribution in the Antarctic Ocean. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 6A, B +) elongate, cylindrical, segmented as in congeners. Body length 2.56 mm. Prosome slightly depressed; maximum width 560 μm across fourth pedigerous somite. Prosome 1.08 mm long, occupying 41% of body length, gradually broadening distally; cephalosome 351×425 μm; first to fourth pedigerous somites 68×431, 154×480, 203×505, and 283×560 μm, respectively. Urosome 5-segmented; fifth pedigerous somite about 220×440 μm, genital somite ( +Fig. 6C +) 1.40 times longer than wide (578×412 μm); small copulatory pore visible on proximal ventral surface. Three abdominal somites 265×302, 154×252, and 185×197 μm, respectively; ventral spinose pad absent between last 2 abdominal somites. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 6D +) 2.53 times longer than wide (81×32 μm), 0.44 times as long as anal somite, with slightly convex inner margin: armed with 6 small setae (1 lateral and 5 distal); lateral seta positioned at 47% of ramus length; largest of distal setae 47 μm long, 0.58 times as long as caudal ramus, all other setae shorter than width of ramus at base. + + + +FIG. 6. +Ascẚdẚcçla antarctẚca +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, anterior part of urosome, ventral; D, left caudal ramus, ventral; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum; H, mandible; I, maxillule. Scale bars: A-C, 0.2 mm; D, G, 0.05 mm; E, F, H, I, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 7. +Ascẚdẚcçla antarctẚca +sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilla; B, maxilliped; C, leg 1; D, leg 2; E, leg 3; F, leg 4; G, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, C-F, 0.05 mm; B, G, 0.02 mm. + + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 6E +) short, 5-segmented; all segments wider than long; armature formula 5, 8, 5, 5+aesthetasc, and 12+3 aesthetascs; all setae naked; shorter setae usually broadened; aesthetascs small. Antenna ( +Fig. 6F +) 3-segmented, consisting of coxobasis and 2-segmented endopod; basis slightly longer than wide (50×47 μm) armed with 1 large spine (45 μm long) distally and ornamented with several scattered rows of spinules; first endopodal segment about 1.6 times longer than wide (38×24 μm), armed with 1 element (only insertion scar was observed) and 2 rows of spinules; second endopodal segment 3.5 times longer than wide (77×22 μm), terminating in slender claw; armed with 1 stout spiniform seta near middle and 4 unequal setae distally (1 much smaller than other 3), and ornamented with several rows of spinules; terminal claw 38 μm long, half as long as second endopodal segment. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 6G +) with concave posterior margin and bearing pair of teeth at each posterolateral corner. Mandible ( +Fig. 6H +) consisting of coxa and palp: coxa with well-developed gnathobase bearing 4 teeth on medial margin; distal 3 teeth bearing 1-4 subsidiary denticles and proximal tooth setiform, weakly pinnate; palp 1-segmented, articulated from broad, pedestal-like extension of coxa; as long as wide, armed with spiniform elements (only 2 spines confirmed; other elements missing). Maxillule ( +Fig. 6I +) consisting of precoxa and unsegmented palp; precoxa bearing 7 spines and 1 proximal seta on arthrite and 2 rows of minute spinules on outer side; palp bearing 7 spiniform elements and 1 minute seta along oblique outer and distal margins, and ornamented with 2 rows of minute spinules subdistally; 2 proximal elements on palp distinctly longer than others. Maxilla ( +Fig. 7A +) consisting of syncoxa and allobasis; syncoxa broad, bearing 1 endite tipped with 1 seta and 1 spine (spine not articulated at base); allobasis drawn out into claw-like process, armed with 7 spiniform setae (grouped as 4, 2, and 1) along outer margin and 1 setiform process on inner margin. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 7B +) 2.4 times longer than wide (58×24 μm), unsegmented, digitiform, ornamented with several rows of fine spinules; armed with 1 apical and 2 medial spinulose setae; apical seta not articulated at base. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 7 +C-F) biramous with 2-segmented rami and narrow intercoxal sclerites; coxa lacking inner seta. Leg 1 with inner distal spine on basis 19 μm long, as long as first endopodal segment. Spines on second exopodal segment of legs 1-4 increasingly longer from outer proximal to inner distal, but fifth spine markedly smaller than other spines. Inner setae on endopods elongate and stiff, as usual for genus. First endopodal segment of legs 3 and 4 bearing inner seta, but this seta absent in legs 1 and 2. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-II-0; III, I, III0-0; I II, 1
Leg 20-01-0I-0; III, I, III0-0; I, III, 3
Leg 30-01-0I-0; III, I, III0-1; I, III, 3
Leg 40-01-0I-0; III, I, II0-1; 0, II, 2
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 6C +) lamellate, covering fifth pedigerous and genital somites, not extending to posterior margin of genital somite, bearing 3 minute vestigial setae (2 ventro-proximal and 1 ventro-distal); left and right legs separate from each other on dorsal side, but fused proximally on ventral side. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 7G +) represented by bifurcate process bearing 2 small setae on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The leg armature of +Ascẚdẚcçla antarctẚca +sp. nov. +is similar to that of +A +. +rçsea +except for the second endopodal segment of leg 4, which is armed with 2 spines and 2 setae (compared to 3 spines and 2 setae in +A +. +rçsea +). In the second exopodal segment of legs 1-4 of +A +. +antarctẚca +sp. nov. +the fifth spine is the smallest, but in legs 3 and 4 of +A +. +rçsea +the fourth is the smallest. +Ascẚdẚcçla antarctẚca +sp. nov. +differs from +A +. +rçsea +and + +A +. +secunda + +in the dimension of the caudal ramus which is 2.53 times longer than wide, while it is 3.93 times (present study) or about 4 times ( +Ooishi, 2007a +) longer than wide in +A +. +rçsea +and 2.82 times (present study) or 4.60 times (Kim I.H. & Moon, 2011) longer than wide in + +A +. +secunda + +. + + +Ascẚdẚcçla antarctẚca +sp. nov. +has a similar shape caudal ramus to +A +. +phẚlẚppẚnensẚs +sp. nov. +and both new species possess the same number of setae (3) on the maxilliped. However, they are easy to distinguish because the setal armature of legs 1-4 is very different. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFEDFFFCFA93F9DDD6EF192B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFEDFFFCFA93F9DDD6EF192B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b037636851c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFEDFFFCFA93F9DDD6EF192B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Ascidicola secunda +Kim I.H. & Moon, 2011 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 2 +, +3 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2014-17361, dissected) in +mçlycarpa papẚllata +(Sluiter, 1886); +New Caledonia + +. + + +Supplementary description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 2A +) elongate, cylindrical, clearly segmented; prosomeurosome division indistinct; body length +3.94 mm +. Prosome +1.41 mm +long, occupying about 36% of body length, consisting of cephalosome and 4 pedigerous somites. Cephalosome 409×600 μm; pedigerous somites becoming gradually longer and wider from first to fourth. Urosome 5-segmented; fifth pedigerous somite and genital somite obscurely defined from each other; both 950×480 μm. Three free abdominal somites 518×400, 455×318, and 349×236 μm, respectively. Spinose pad ornamented with various sizes of spinules present ventrally between last 2 abdominal somites ( +Fig. 2B +). Anal somite ( +Fig. 2B +) about 1.5 times longer than wide. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 2C +) 2.82 times longer than wide (127×45 μm), 36% as long as anal somite, armed with 1 lateral, 1 subdistal dorsal, and prob- ably 4 distal setae (2 of distal setae missing in +Fig. 2A–C +); lateral seta positioned at 43% length of caudal ramus. + + + +FIG. 2. +Ascẚdẚcçla + +secunda +Kim I.H. & Moon, 2011 + +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, distal part of urosome, ventral; C, right caudal ramus, dorsal; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, labrum; G, mandible; H, maxillule; I, maxilla; J, maxilliped; K, leg 5 and genital somite, ventral. Scale bars: A, K, 0.5 mm; B, 0.1 mm; C-I, 0.05 mm; J, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 3. +Ascẚdẚcçla + +secunda +Kim I.H. & Moon, 2011 + +,female. A, leg 1; B, leg 2; C, leg 3; D, leg 4; E, leg 6. Scale bars: A-D, 0.05 mm; E, 0.02 mm. + + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 2D +) short, 184 μm long, curved posteriorly, 5-segmented; first segment bear- ing 5 setae; numbers of setae on other segments uncertain due to loss of some setae.Antenna ( +Fig. 2E +) 3-segmented, consisting of coxobasis and 2-segmented endopod; coxobasis narrowing distally, armed with 1 spine (52 μm long) distally; short first endopodal segment with 1 spine (45 μm long) subdistally; second endopodal segment elongate, 5.07 times longer than wide (137×27 μm), armed with 1 small spine (15 μm long) near proximal third and 3 setae subdistally, and terminating in small, straight claw (40 μm long). + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 2F +) wider than long, fringed with hyaline covering along lateral margin, and with 2 tooth-like processes at each posterolateral corner. Mandible ( +Fig. 2G +) consisting of coxa and palp; coxa with well-developed gnathobase bearing 3 major and 4 minor teeth on medial margin; minor teeth serrate at tip; palp 1-segmented, articulated from pedestal-like extension of coxa, armed with 5 setae (outer proximal seta distinctly larger than other setae). Maxillule ( +Fig. 1H +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa bearing 8 naked setae on arthrite; palp not divided, slightly longer than wide, armed with 7 setae (2 longer outer proximal, 3 subdistal, and 2 distal, with inner distal seta spiniform). Maxilla ( +Fig. 2I +) 2-segmented; broad first segment (syncoxa) with lobate endite tipped with 2 setae; second segment (allobasis) terminating in spiniform process, armed with 1 spine and 5 setae on outer margin and 1 small seta on inner margin. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 2J +) unsegmented, elongate, armed with 4 setae (1 apical and 3 medial), and ornamented with 2 rows of minute spinules. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 3 +A-D) biramous with 2-segmented rami; coxa and basis broad; inner coxal seta absent; first exopodal segment lacking inner seta; inner setae on endopods large. Distal spine on second exopodal segment of legs 1-4 claw-like, indistinctly articulated from second exopodal segment. First endopodal segment of legs 3 and 4 bearing inner seta, but that of legs 1 and 2 lacking inner seta. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-I +I-0; +IV +, I, 0 + +0-0; I, +II +, 1 +
Leg 20-01-0 +I-0; +III +, I, 0 + +0-0; 0, +II +, 3 +
Leg 30-01-0 +I-0; +III +, I, 0 + +0-1; 0, +II +, 3 +
Leg 40-01-0 +I-0; +II +, I, 0 + +0-1; 0, +II +, 2 +
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 2K +) skirt-like, encircling first 2 urosomites, bearing 2 minute vestigial setae on proximal ventral margin ( +Fig. 2K +); left and right legs 5 fused proximally on ventral side but separate dorsally. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 3E +) represented by 2 large setae and 4 spiniform processes on genital operculum. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +This species was described from Korean waters (Kim I.H. & Moon, 2011). The caudal ramus of the single female specimen from +New Caledonia +examined here is distinctly smaller than that of +type +specimens, only 2.82 times longer than wide (127 ×45 μm) compared to 4.23 times longer than wide (338×80 μm) in the +type +specimens, and 0.36 times as long as anal somite compared to 0.76 times as long in the +type +material. This difference in the dimension of the caudal ramus is tentatively interpreted here as intraspecific variation because no other significant difference was observed between the +types +and the New Caledonian material. Material from both locations exhibits the identical armature of the mouthparts and legs 1-4. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFEEFFF9FA93FB2DD09B18B3.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFEEFFF9FA93FB2DD09B18B3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6b3fac05052 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFEEFFF9FA93FB2DD09B18B3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,278 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Ascidicola philippinensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 4 +, +5 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1941, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +mterygascẚdẚa lçnga +( +Van Name +, 1918); +The +Philippines +, MUSORSTOM 3 cruise, +RV +“Coriolis”, +Stn CP +131 ( +11°27´N +, +121°43´E +), depth +120-122 m +, +Bouchet +& Triclot-MNHN coll., + +05 June 1985 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of this new species is based on the +type +locality. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 4A +) elongate, body shape and segmentation as in +type +species, +A +. +rçsea +. Body length 3.40 mm. Prosome ( +Fig. 4B +) slightly depressed dorsoventrally, about 1.0 mm long, occupying 29% of body length. Cephalosome 369×438 μm, with rounded anterior margin; first to fourth pedigerous somites 92×400, 138×446, 154×488, and 230×378 μm, respectively. Urosome 5-segmented, curved dorsally; genital somite about 860 μm long (average of longer ventral and shorter dorsal margins); copulatory pore positioned on ventral surface at anterior 17% of somite length. First and second abdominal somites 470 and 446 μm long, respectively; anal somite ( +Fig. 4C +) slightly tapering, about 1.5 times longer than wide (477×315 μm), widest anterior 20% of somite length; anal operculum broad. Spinose pad lacking between second abdominal and anal somites. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 4D +) tapering, 2.76 times longer than wide (149×54 μm), 31% as long as anal somite, armed with 6 small setae and or- namented with several rows of minute spinules; all caudal setae shorter than proximal width of ramus; lateral and subdistal dorsal setae positioned at 42% and 70% of ramus length, respectively. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 4F +) short, 138 μm long, 5-segmented; all segments wider than long; armature formula 5, 8, 4, 4, and 12; setae naked and of different lengths, some of shorter, blunt setae aesthetasc-like. Antenna ( +Fig. 4G +) 3-segmented, consisting of coxobasis and 2-segmented endopod; coxobasis slightly longer than wide (54×46 μm), bearing 1 strong spine (50 μm long) distally; first endopodal segment 35×25 μm, bearing 1 strong spine (46 μm long) subdistally; second endopodal segment gradually narrowing distally, 1.90 times long than wide (78×20 μm), terminating in slender claw (28 μm long); armed with 1 small spine proximally and 4 setae distally (one 73 μm long, much longer than other 3). + + + +FIG. 4. +Ascẚdẚcçla phẚlẚppẚnensẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, left; B, anterior part of prosome, dorsal; C, anal somite and caudal rami, dorsal; D, right caudal ramus, dorsal; E, anterior part of urosome, ventral; F, antennule; G, antenna. Scale bars: A, E, 0.5 mm; B, D, 0.2 mm; C, 0.1 mm; F, G, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 5. +Ascẚdẚcçla phẚlẚppẚnensẚs +sp. nov. +, female. A, labrum; B, mandible; C, maxillule; D, maxilla; E, maxilliped; F, leg 1; G, leg 2; H, leg 3; I, leg 4. Scale bars: A, D-I, 0.05 mm; B, C, 0.02 mm. + + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 5A +) broad, with 2 dentiform processes at each posterolateral corner and row of minute spinules along posterior margin. Mandible ( +Fig. 5B +) consisting of coxa and palp: coxal gnathobase broadened, medial margin bearing strong tooth distally, 3 larger and 3 smaller teeth; larger teeth bearing 1 or 2 subsidiary denticles; palp 1-segmented, articulated with broad, pedestal-like extension of coxa, armed with 5 unequal setae, largest seta (on medial margin) 110 μm long. Maxillule ( +Fig. 5C +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa with medially extended arthrite bearing 7 spines and 1 small proximal seta; palp distinctly articulated from precoxa, bearing 8 elements (5 unequal spines and 3 setae). Maxilla ( +Fig. 5D +) consisting of syncoxa and allbasis; syncoxa broad, bearing 1 endite tipped with 2 setae (proximal seta larger and spiniform); allobasis terminating in claw-like process, bearing 6 setae on outer margin and 1 small seta on inner margin. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 5E +) slender, digitiform, bearing 1 apical and 2 medial setae; ornamented with fine spinules distally. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 5 +F-I) biramous with 2-segmented rami; coxa unarmed; intercoxal sclerite narrow; setae on endopods large and stiff, as usual for genus. Leg 1 with inner distal seta on basis 28 μm long, longer than first endopodal segment. Medial of 2 distal spines on second exopodal segment of legs 1-4 denticle-like, much smaller than outer spine but distinctly articulated at base. First endopodal segment unarmed in legs 1 and 2, but with inner seta in legs 3 and 4. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-II-0; III, II, 00-0; 0, II, 1
Leg 20-01-0I-0; II, II, 00-0; 0, II, 3
Leg 30-01-0I-0; II, II, 00-1; 0, III, 3
Leg 40-01-0I-0; I, II, 00-1; 0, II, 2
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 4E +) lamellate, encircling fifth pedigerous and genital somites, extending to posterior margin of genital somite, bearing 3 minute setules (2 ventro-proximal and 1 ventro-distal); left and right legs separated from each other on dorsal side, but fused proximally on ventral side. Leg 6 not examined. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +Ascẚdẚcçla phẚlẚppẚnensẚs +sp. nov. +differs from +A +. +rçsea +, + +A +. +secunda + +, and +A +. +antarctẚca +sp. nov. +described below in having 2 spines + 1 seta on the second endopodal segment of leg 1 (in contrast to 3 spines + 1 seta in all three congeneric species) and 3 spines + 3 setae on the second endopodal segment of leg 3 (in contrast to 2 spines + 3 setae in + +A +. +secunda + +and 4 spines + 3 setae in the other two congeners). The numbers of spines on the second exopodal segments of legs 1-4 of the new species are same as in + +A +. +secunda + +, but the shape and arrangement of the spines are quite different between the two species: there are fewer spines on the outer margin of the segment in +A +. +phẚlẚppẚnensẚs +sp. nov. +and it lacks the small, dentiform inner distal spine that is present on this segment in + +A +. +secunda + +. The possession of 3 setae on the maxilliped is an additional difference between +A +. +phẚllẚppẚnensẚs +sp. nov. +and both +A +. +rçsea +and + +A +. +secunda + +which have 5 and 4 setae, respectively, on the maxilliped. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFF0FFE0FA93FE15D78A197F.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFF0FFE0FA93FE15D78A197F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..47ed794ebe6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFF0FFE0FA93FE15D78A197F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Styelicola elongata + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 10 +, +11 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1943, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +mçlycarpa aurẚta +(Sluiter, 1890); +Plateau des Chesterfield +, +Coral Sea +, west of +New Caledonia +, CORAIL 2 cruise, +R +. +V +. “Coriolis”, +Stn CP +90 ( +19°02.8’S +, +158°56.3’E +), depth +44 – 48 m +, +B. Richer +de Forges-IRD coll., + +26 July 1988 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species refers to its elongate body. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 10A +) elongate, cylindrical, slightly curved ventrally. Body length 6.55 mm; maximum width 0.94 mm across third pedigerous somite. Prosome unsegmented, but cephalosome and four pedigerous somites discernible by constrictions and weak dorsal tergites. Prosome-urosome division obscure; fifth pedigerous somite not articulated from prosome. Urosome indistinctly 6-segmented; articulations between somites represented by constrictions and surface wrinkles. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 10B +) about 1.5 times longer than wide (89×58 μm), narrowing distally; armed with 6 setae (1 lateral, 1 subdistal, and 4 distal), all naked and less than half width of ramus; lateral seta positioned at 32% of ramus length. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 10C +) 235 μm long, broad, 1.7 times longer than wide; 5-segmented, second and terminal segments subdivided; armature formula 2, 9, 3, 2, and 12; setae short and naked, some bluntly tipped and aesthetasc-like. Antenna ( +Fig. 10D +) consisting of coxbasis and 2-segmented endopod; coxobasis slightly longer than wide, bearing 1 spiniform seta distally; first endopodal segment as long as coxobasis, unarmed; second endopodal segment as long as first, 2.3 times longer than wide (74×32 μm); armed with 5 small setae (2 proximal and 3 distal) plus small terminal claw (23 μm long). + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 10E +) broad, narrowing distally, bearing pair of dentiform processes at each posterolateral corner. Mandible ( +Fig. 10F +) consisting of coxa with well-developed gnathobase bearing on medial margin 4 major teeth and 1 or 2 small subsidiary teeth between major teeth, and 2-segmented palp; first segment (fused basis and exopod) with 2 bluntly tipped setae (originally exopodal setae) distally; second segment (endopod) nearly quadrate, with 4 bluntly tipped setae on distal margin. Maxillule ( +Fig. 10H, I +) bilobed: inner lobe (precoxal arthrite) bearing 7 setae; outer lobe (palp) bearing 1 seta subdistally and 8 setae distally (3, 2, and 3 setae on 3 small lobes); all setae on maxillule bluntly tipped and subequal in length. Maxilla ( +Fig. 10J +) consisting of syncoxa and allobasis; syncoxa broad, unarmed, with 1 small pore (opening of maxillary gland) on inner surface; allobasis terminating in spiniform claw, armed with 4 spines (1 on outer margin and 3 on inner margin) near base of terminal claw. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 10K +) as blunt, unarmed digitiform lobe. + + +Leg 1 ( +Fig. 11A +) consisting of unarmed coxa, basis bearing outer seta, and 2-segmented exopod and endopod. Outer spines on exopod small, rudimentary. Second exopodal segment tapering and terminating in spiniform process. Endopod broad, both segments unarmed; second segment blunt, with broadly rounded distal margin. Legs 2-4 shaped and armed as in leg 1, but larger than leg 1, increasing in size from leg 2 to leg 4. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Legs 1-40-01-0I-0; III, 00-0; 0
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 11B +) consisting of lamellate protopod and small exopod: protopod 558×818 μm, directed dorsally, bearing 1 small seta dorsodistally; exopod 91×89 μm, inserting on ventral margin of protopod, strongly tapering, partially subdivided on ventral side; armed distally with 1 large and 3 minute setae. Leg 6 not observed. + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The distinctive features of +Styelẚcçla elçngata +sp. nov. +are as follows: (1) the body of the female is large, + + + +FIG. 10. +Styelẚcçla elçngata +sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, right; B, right caudal ramus, dorsal; C, antennule; D, antenna; E, labrum; F, mandible; G, paragnath; H, maxillule; I, palp of maxillule; J, maxilla; K, maxilliped. Scale bars: A, 0.5 mm; B-K, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 11. +Styelẚcçla elçngata +sp. nov. +, female. A, leg 1; B, leg 5; C, exopod of leg 5. Scale bars: A, C, 0.05 mm; B, 0.2 mm. + + + +6.55 mm long; (2) the caudal ramus is broad, about 1.5 times longer than wide; (3) the mandibular palp is 2-segmented; (4) the maxilla lacks an endite; (5) the endopods of legs 1-4 are unarmed; and (6) the exopod of leg 5 is distinctly tapering and armed with 1 large and 3 small setae. Character states (4) and (5) are shared with +S +. +çmphalus +, but the others are exhibited exclusively by +S +. +elçngata +sp. nov. +In congeners, such as +S +. +çmphalus +, the body is at most 4.35 mm long, the caudal ramus is at least twice as long as wide, the mandibular palp is single-segmented, and the exopod of leg 5 is nearly rectangular and bears 5 or 6 setae. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFF2FFEFFA93FBD9D6B11D8B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFF2FFEFFA93FBD9D6B11D8B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eb6f4770874 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFF2FFEFFA93FBD9D6B11D8B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Hamistyelicola + +gen. nov. + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Body slender; prosome-urosome division not distinct. Prosome 5-segmented. Urosome 6-segmented. Spinose pad present ventrally between pre-anal and anal somites. Caudal ramus bearing 6 setae. Rostrum not developed. Antennule 7-segmented. Antenna 3-segmented, bearing terminal claw; all segments armed. Mandible consisting of coxa with well-developed gnathobase bearing 4 major teeth on medial margin, and biramous palp, armed with 6 setae on endopod and 1 seta on tip of small exopod. Maxillule consisting of precoxa and biramous palp; precoxa bearing 7 to 9 setae on arthrite; palp bearing 5 setae on basis, 2 setae on exopod, and 6 setae on endopod; exopod and endopod articulated from or fused with basis. Maxilla 2- or 3-segmented; first segment (syncoxa) with single endite tipped with 3 setae; second segment (allobasis) or second and third segments (basis and endopod) bearing 8 or 9 setae in total, lacking claw. Maxilliped 1 or 2-segmented, armed with 4 or 5 setae. Legs 1-4 broad, biramous with 2-segmented rami; coxa unarmed; basis with large outer seta. Basis of leg 1 bearing inner distal spine. Spines on exopods and endopods distinct. Distal segment of exopod of legs 2-4 transformed to large, powerful hook. Leg 5 consisting of lamellate protopod bearing 1 seta distally and small exopod bearing 6 setae. Leg 6 represented by 3 dentiform processes on genital operculum. + + + + + + +Type +species. + +eamẚstyelẚcçla lẚghtẚ +( +Illg +& + +Dudley +, 1980 + +) +comb. nov. +(originally as +Styelẚcçla lẚghtẚ +), by original designation + +. + + +Other included species +. +eamẚstyelẚcçla mçnnẚçtçrum +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +ham +(=hooked) and the generic name +Styelẚcçla +. Gender masculine. + + + + +Remarks. +The most outstanding feature of +eamẚstyelẚcçla +gen. nov. +is the transformation of the second exopodal segment of legs 2-4 into a powerful hook. The discovery of a second species possessing this hook, as in +Styelẚcçla lẚghtẚI +leads us to establish a new genus to accommodate both these two species. + + +Within the family, +eamẚctyelẚcçla +gen. nov. +appears closer to +Ascẚdẚcçla +than to +Styelẚcçla +as both genera share the following character states: the first endopodal segment of the antenna bears a seta, the maxilliped is armed with multiple setae, and the inner spine on the first endopodal segment is present at least in leg 4. The presence of the large conspicuous hook on the exopod of legs 2-4, and the possession of 2-segmented fifth leg are distinctive features separating the new genus from +Ascẚdẚcçla +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFF7FFE2FA93FA21D6DE1C33.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFF7FFE2FA93FA21D6DE1C33.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f7939440f68 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFF7FFE2FA93FA21D6DE1C33.xml @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Styelicola bahusia +Lützen, 1968 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 8 +, +9 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +1 ♀ +(MNHN-IU-2015-7, dissected) in +Styela sẚgma +Hartmeyer +, 1912; off +French Guiana +, +GUYANE +2014 cruise, +RV +“Hermano Gines”, +Stn CP +4366 ( +07°09´N +, +53°05´W +), depth +300-301 m +, +MNHN +coll., + +01 August 2014 + + +. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 8A +) elongate, curved dorsally, with weakly sclerotized, rather soft exoskeleton; body length 2.62 mm. Prosome longer than urosome, slightly depressed, and unsegmented, but cephalosome defined by cephalic shield and 4 pedigerous somites recognizable by weak dorsal tergites. Urosome ( +Fig. 8B +) 5-segmented, gradually narrowing posteriorly. Articulation between fifth pedigerous somite and genital somite obscure; genital somite longer than wide; genital apertures positioned dorsally. Anal somite slightly longer than wide, longer than second abdominal somite, with deep posteromedian incision; anal operculum distinct. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 8C +) nearly fusiform, 2.09 times longer than wide (117×56 μm), 0.63 times as long as anal somite, with strongly convex inner margin: armed with 6 small setae (1 lateral and 5 distal); lateral seta positioned at 36% of ramus length; all setae naked and shorter than width of ramus. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 8D +) stout, 228 μm long, 7-segmented, gradually narrowing distally; armature formula 2, 11, 3, 2, 2, 2, and 12; setae small and naked; 2 of setae on terminal segment aesthetasc-like. Antenna ( +Fig. 8E +) consisting of coxobasis and 2-segmented endopod; coxobasis broadening distally, longer than wide, armed with 1 broad spine distally: first endopodal segment unarmed, but ornamented with patch of minute spinules near anterodistal corner; second endopodal segment as long as first, bearing 3 small setae (1 proximal and 2 distal) plus acutely pointed claw; ornamented with minute spinules proximally on anterior surface. + + + +FIG. 8. +Styelẚcçla bahusẚa +Lützen, 1968 +, female. A, habitus, right; B, urosome, dorsal; C, right caudal ramus, ventral; D, antennule; E, antenna; F, mandible; G, paragnath; H, maxillule; I, maxilla; J, K, maxilliped; L, leg 5, medial; M, exopod of leg 5; N, genital aperture. Scale bars: A, 0.5 mm; B, L, M, 0.1 mm; C, D, G, I, 0.05 mm; E, F, H, J, K, N, 0.02 mm. + + + + +FIG. 9. +Styelẚcçla bahusẚa +Lützen, 1968 +, female. A, Leg 1; B, leg 2. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. + + + +Labrum not observed (destroyed). Mandible ( +Fig. 8F +) consisting of coxa and unsegmented palp: coxal gnathobase with 4 major and 3 subsidiary teeth on medial margin; palp about 2.2 times longer than wide, with slightly convex outer margin, armed distally with 4 short setae. Paragnath ( +Fig. 8G +) broadening distally, with 3 setiform elements proximally on medial margin, 1 dentiform process at distal third of medial margin and angular mediodistal corner. Maxillule ( +Fig. 8H +) consisting of precoxa and palp: precoxal arthrite armed with 7 spines and 1 proximal seta; palp 2-segmented; first segment subdivided proximally, bearing 7 blunt setae (3 proximal and 2 distal setae on medial margin, and 2 longer setae at outer distal corner); second segment (?endopod) quadrate, bearing 4 setae on distal margin. Maxilla ( +Fig. 8I +) consisting of syncoxa and allobasis; syncoxa broad, bearing single endite tipped with 2 unequal setae, both articulated at base; allobasis armed with 6 unequal spiniform elements (largest element distally). Maxilliped ( +Fig. 8J, K +) as digitiform lobe tipped with 1 seta and ornamented with several rows of minute spinules. + + +Legs 1-4 biramous with 2-segmented rami; coxa lacking inner seta; second exopodal segment conical ( +Fig. 9A, B +). Outer spines on exopods and endopods usually rudimentary. Endopods stout, expanded, with incomplete articulation between segments; distal margin of second segment rounded. Legs 3 and 4 shaped and armed as in leg 2. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-II-0; III, 00-0; 0, II, 0
Legs 2-40-01-0I-0; III, 00-0; III, II, 0
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 8L +) 2-segmented, consisting of lamellate protopod and small exopod; protopod 318×303 μm, subcircu- lar, extending to middle of genital somite ( +Fig. 8B +), bearing 1 small seta distally; exopod ( +Fig. 8M +) about 1.3 times longer than wide (68×52 μm), inserting on ventral margin of protopod and armed with 6 unequal setae (2 dorsal setae distinctly longer than other 4). Leg 6 ( +Fig. 8N +) represented by 3 spiniform processes on genital operculum + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The single female specimen examined here is elongate and contrasts with the body form in the original description of +Styelẚcçla bahusẚa +by +Lützen (1968) +who described the female body as short, thick and broad. This difference is almost certainly due to the different methods of specimen preservation: we consider that our specimens became inflated after fixation, whereas the type specimens probably contracted. There are other differences: in the +type +specimens the antennule is 8-segmented, the maxillular palp is unsegmented, and the swimming legs have a different armature formula. However, we consider it likely that these differences are artefacts or possibly represent intraspecific variation. The shape of the caudal ramus and the armature of the mandible, maxillule, and maxilliped of our West Atlantic specimen all coincide exactly with the description of the +type +specimens and, it is on the basis of this evidence that we identify them as +SK bahusẚa +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFF7FFE5FA93FEA1D5861827.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFF7FFE5FA93FEA1D5861827.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7cc60bfa1d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFF7FFE5FA93FEA1D5861827.xml @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + +Genus + +Styelicola +Lützen, 1968 + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Body flexible with weak exoskeleton. Prosome not segmented or indistinctly segmented, but cephalosome and 4 pedigerous somites discernible by dorsal cephalic shield and 4 dorsal tergites. Urosome shorter than prosome, incompletely segmented. Caudal ramus bearing 6 setae. Rostrum not developed. Antennule 5- to 8-segmented; first segment bearing 2 setae. Antenna 3-segmented; first segment (coxobasis) bearing broad spine distally; second segment (first endopodal segment) unarmed; third segment (second endopodal segment) bearing terminal claw and several small setae. Mandible consisting of coxa with well-developed gnathobase bearing 4 major teeth on medial margin, and 1- or 2-segmented palp. Maxillule consisting of precoxa armed with 7 or 8 elements on arthrite, and 1- or 2-segmented palp bearing 9 to 11 setae. Maxilla consisting of syncoxa and allobasis; syncoxa bearing single endite tipped with 2 setae, or endite absent. Maxilliped lobate, digitiform, and unarmed, or armed with 1 seta distally. Legs 1-4 biramous with 2-segmented rami. Coxa of legs 1-4 unarmed. Basis of leg 1 bearing inner distal spine. Exopods tapering, with small or vestigial outer spines; endopods broad, rounded distally, unarmed or armed with few spines. Leg 5 consisting of lamellate protopod and small, setae-bearing exopod. Leg 6 represented by 3 denticles on genital operculum. + + + + + +Type +species. + +Styelẚcçla bahusẚa +Lützen, 1968 +by original designation. + + + + +Remarks. +Three species have been assigned to the genus +Styelẚcçla +: +SK bahusẚa +associated with +Styela sẚgma +Hartmeyer, 1912 (as +S +. +atlantẚca +in the original description) and +Styela gelatẚnçsa +(Traustedt, 1886) from Swedish waters ( +Lützen, 1968 +), +Styelẚcçla lẚghtẚ +Illg & +Dudley, 1980 +associated with +eartmeyerẚa chẚnensẚs +Tokioka, 1967 in the +China +Sea (Illg & +Dudley, 1980 +), and +Styelẚcçla çmphalus +Kim I.H., Cruz-Rivera, Sherif, & El-Salmar, 2016 associated with +mhallusẚa nẚgra +Savigny, 1816 in the Red Sea (Kim I.H. et al., 2016). In the present account a new species is added to this genus, and +Styelẚcçla lẚghtẚ +is removed to a new genus. + + +The absence of any armature element on the first endopodal segment of the antenna seems to be the most outstanding feature of the genus +Styelẚcçla +within the +Ascidicolidae +. Other features have been considered as distinguishing characters of the genus, including: the body has a weakly sclerotized, soft exoskeleton, the maxilliped is unarmed or armed with a single seta, the armature on the rami of the swimming legs is less well developed than other genera of the family, and the exopods of the swimming legs taper distally while the endopods are very broad and appear lamellate. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFFAFFD5FA93FF10D0C41D8B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFFAFFD5FA93FF10D0C41D8B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..09d2f862c26 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFFAFFD5FA93FF10D0C41D8B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Bathycopola brevicaudata + +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 16 +, +17 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1946, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +Bathystyelçẚdes enderbyanus +(Michaelsen, 1904) (MNHN-IT-2008-1439 = +MNHN +S1 +/ +BAT +.B/24); +West Atlantic +, DEMERABY cruise, +RV +“Jean Charcot”, +Stn CP +08 ( +10°25.10’N +, +46°46.90’W +), depth +4850 m +, + +01 September 1980 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +brev +(=short) and +caud +(=the tail), referring to the short urosome of the new species. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 16A, B +) stout, pupa-shaped. Body length 1.15 mm; maximum width 386 μm across fourth pedigerous somite. Prosome 5-segmented, occupying most of body length; cephalosome 204×364 μm, slightly wider than first and second pedigerous somites; dorsal cephalic shield well-developed. First to third pedigerous somites each bearing thin tergite; tergite of fourth pedigerous somite extended posteriorly, covering most of urosome, with rounded posterior margin in dorsal view ( +Fig. 16A +), but obliquely tapering in lateral view ( +Fig. 16B +). Urosome ( +Fig. 16C +) small, about 355 μm long, gradually narrowing posteriorly, 5-segmented but first segment (fifth pedigerous somite) very short, obscure. Genital somite wider than long, bearing small copulatory pore proximally on ventral surface. Caudal ramus ( +Fig. 16D +) about 2.8 times longer than wide (76×27 μm); armed with 3 spines and 3 setae (1 seta on outer margin, 1 seta on subdistal inner side, and 1 seta and 3 spines distally); outer margin seta longest, half as long as caudal ramus; innermost of 3 distal spines much smaller than other 2. + + +Rostrum as short, blunt anterior prominence on cephalosome. Antennule ( +Fig. 16E +) slender, 220 μm long, 6- segmented; armature formula 2, 8, 3, 6+aesthetasc, 2+aesthetasc, and 11+2 aesthetascs; second segment subdivided into 3 and 5 setae regions; setae thin and generally long; aesthetascs small, confusable with setae. Antenna ( +Fig. 16F +) 3-segmented, consisting of basis and 2-segmented endopod; basis broadening distally, 59×45 μm, armed with 1 elongate spine (56 μm long) distally and bearing few spinules in distal region; first endopodal segment 55×32 μm with 1 seta on inner margin; second endopodal segment about 2.5 times longer than wide (45×18 μm); armed with 2 middle and 4 distal setae plus slender terminal claw, 0.8 times as long as segment. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 16G +) short but broad, with pair of bicuspid processes on posteroventral surface. Mandible ( +Fig. 16H +) consisting of coxa and palp: coxal gnathobase bearing 1 distal tooth and several spinule-like denticles along medial margin; palp biramous, armed with 3 setae on basis, 4 on exopod, and 6 on endopod; endopod articulated from basis but exopod not demarcated from basis; setae on exopod feebly pinnate, other setae naked. Maxillule ( +Fig. 16I +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa bearing 9 setae on arthrite; palp consisting of basis, exopod and endopod; armed with 6 setae on basis, 2 on exopod, and 3 on endopod; exopod and endopod not articulated from basis; 1 additional seta present between arthrite and basis. Maxilla ( +Fig. 17A +) 3-segmented; large syncoxa bearing 2 endites each tipped with 1 seta; basis with claw plus 3 setae; endopod small, bearing 5 setae. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 17B +) as tapering lobe bearing 7 setae and 3 rows of spinules. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 17 +C-F) biramous with 2-segmented rami. Inner seta on coxa present only in leg 4. First endopodal segment of legs 1-4 unarmed. In legs 3 and 4, outer spine of first exopodal segment and distal spine of second exopodal segment markedly elongated (longer than exopod). Most of spines on rami spinulose distally. Exopods and endopods of legs 2-4 with same armature formula, as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-II-0; III, I, III0-0; I, II, I
Legs 2 & 30-01-0I-0; III, I, III+10-0; I, II, I+1
Leg 40-11-0I-0; III, I, III+10-0; I, II, I+1
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 17G +) consisting of lamellate protopod and small exopod; protopod as long as urosome, covering almost entire dorsal surface of urosome ( +Fig. 16A, B +), bearing 1 small seta on distal margin; exopod 2.18 times longer than wide (98×45 μm), armed with 6 unequal setae (1 on ventral margin and 5 distally). Leg 6 not examined. + + +Male. +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The diagnostic features of + +Bathycçpçla +brevẚcaudata + +gen. et sp. nov. +are; (1) the dorsal tergite of the fourth pedigerous somite extends posteriorly to cover most of the urosome; (2) the maxillary endopod is 1-segmented and armed with five setae; (3) the second exopodal segments of legs 2-4 are each armed with 7 spines and 1 seta; (4) the second endopodal segments of legs 2-4 are each armed with 4 spines and 1 seta; and (5) the inner coxal seta present only in leg 4. These diagnostic features serve to distinguish the new species from its congeners. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFFDFFECFA93FEB8D6071F6B.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFFDFFECFA93FEB8D6071F6B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..489571dc998 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFFDFFECFA93FEB8D6071F6B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Hamistyelicola monniotorum + +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 12 +, +13 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(MNHN-IU-2018-1944, dissected and mounted on a slide) from +myura gangelẚçn +(Savigny, 1816); Ibo, +Mozambique +, AURACEA 1995 cruise, depth +0 - 20 m +, +Monniot +coll., + +November 1995 + +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The name of this new species is dedicated to Drs. Claude and Françoise Monniot who collected the copepod material studied in the present work. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 12A +) slender, cylindrical, and distinctly segmented. Body length 2.83 mm; maximum body width 500 μm across third pedigerous somite. Prosome consisting of cephalosome and 4 pedigerous somites, occupying 44% of body length. Urosome 6-segmented, but articulation indistinct between fifth pedigerous somite and genital somite. Genital somite much shorter than first abdominal somite; genital aperture positioned dorsally. Four abdominal somites 335×269, 388×246, 299×201, and 132×166 μm, respectively; penultimate abdominal somite ornamented with numerous minute spinules dorsally and ventrally along posterior margin ( +Fig. 12B +). Caudal rami ( +Fig. 12B +) widely separated from each other, slightly divergent; each ramus about 4 times longer than wide (177×44 μm), gradually narrowing distally: armed with 6 small setae; outer and subdistal dorsal setae positioned at 53% and 80% of ramus length, respectively; largest of 4 distal setae 67 μm long, longer than proximal width of ramus, all other setae shorter than proximal width of ramus. + + +Rostrum absent. Antennule ( +Fig. 12C +) 7-segmented, gradually narrowing distally; armature formula 4, 6, 5, 3, 3, 3, and 9+2 aesthetascs; first segment subdivided on one surface into 2 parts each bearing 2 setae; some of shorter setae on third to fifth segments finely spinulose unilaterally. Antenna ( +Fig. 12D +) 3-segmented, consisting of coxbasis and 2-segmented endopod; coxobasis about twice as long as wide and armed with 1 spine distally (52 μm long); first endopodal segment distinctly shorter than coxobasis, armed with 1 spine (32 μm long) near middle and ornamented with several rows of fine spinules; second endopodal segment 3.0 times longer than wide (75×25 μm), armed with terminal claw, 2 spiniform setae on anterior (inner) margin, and 1 subdistal and 2 distal setae; ornamented with several rows of fine spinules; terminal claw small, less than half length of second endopodal segment. + + +Labrum weak, flexible, easily destroyed. Mandible (Fig, 12E) consisting of coxa and palp; coxal gnathobase bearing 4 major teeth on medial margin and 2 denticles and row of spinules on proximal margin; palp unsegmented, biramous, armed with 1 large seta on tip of small exopod and 6 setae (2 medial and 4 distal) on fused basis + endopod. Maxillule ( +Fig. 12F +) consisting of precoxa bearing 9 setae on arthrite and biramous palp comprising basis and articulating exopod and endopod; armed with 5 setae on basis, 2 setae on exopod, and 6 setae on endopod. Maxilla ( +Fig. 12G +) consisting of syncoxa, basis, and rudimentary endopod; syncoxa broad, bearing 1 endite tipped with 3 setae; basis lacking claw, blunt at tip, bearing 4 setae (2 subdistal and 2 distal); endopod small, with 5 setae. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 13A +) as tapering lobe bearing 5 setae (2 on medial margin and 3 apically). + + +Legs 1-4 broad, biramous with 2-segmented rami ( +Fig. 13 +B-D); coxa lacking inner seta; outer seta on basis large; spines on rami distinct, but setae lacking from both rami of legs 1-4. Second segment of leg 1 endopod ( +Fig. 13B +) quadrilobate along distal margin, all these lobes marginally spinulose. Second (distal) segment of exopod of leg 2-4 transformed to large, powerful hook ( +Fig. 13C, D +). Second endopodal segment of legs 2-4 bearing longitudinal groove receiving exopodal hook and 2 horizontal rows of spinules on posterior surface. First endopodal segment of leg 4 bearing inner spine, but this spine absent in legs 1-3. Armature formula for legs 1-4 as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-II-0; II, I, II0-0; IV
Legs 2 & 30-01-0I-0; hook0-0; II, II, II
Leg 40-01-0I-0; hook0-1; II, II, I
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 13E +) consisting of protopod and small exopod; protopod lamellate, 252×252 μm, slightly oblong, with 1 seta distally; exopod 1.15 times longer than wide (54×47 μm), bearing 4 large and 2 small setae: lengths of large setae 280, 457, 485, and 308 μm long, respectively, from ventral to dorsal; 2 small setae 39 and 67 μm. Leg 6 ( +Fig. 13F +) represented by 3 teeth on genital operculum. + + + +FIG. 12. +eamẚstyelẚcçla mçnnẚçtçrum +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, distal part of urosome, dorsal; C, antennule; D, antenna; E, mandible; F, maxillule; G, maxilla. Scale bars: A, 0.2 mm; B, 0.1 mm; C-G, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 13. +eamẚstyelẚcçla mçnnẚçtçrum +gen. et sp. nov. +, female. A, maxilliped; B, leg 1; C, leg 2; D, leg 4; E, leg 5; F, genital aperture. Scale bars: A-D, F, 0.02 mm; E, 0.1 mm. + + + + +Male +. + +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +eamẚstyelẚcçla mçnnẚçtçrum +gen. et sp. nov. +is distinguishable from +e +. +lẚghtẚ +(Illg & +Dudley, 1980 +) +comb. nov. +as follows: (1) a small tubercle is present at the distal border of the anal somite (near the base of the caudal ramus), as figured by Illg & +Dudley (1980) +in the original description of +e +. +lẚghtẚ +comb. nov. +, but is absent in +e +. +mçnnẚçtçrum +gen. et sp. nov. +; (2) the exopod and endopod of the maxillule are fused with the basis in +e +. +lẚghtẚ +, but distinctly articulated from the basis in +e +. +mçnnẚçtçrum +gen. et sp. nov. +; (3) the maxilliped is armed with 4 setae in +e +. +lẚghtẚ +comb. nov. +, but with 5 setae in +e +. +mçnnẚçtçrum +gen. et sp. nov. +; (4) the second exopodal segment of leg 1 is armed with 6 spines in +e +. +lẚghtẚ +comb. nov. +, but with 5 spines in +e +. +mçnnẚçtçrum +gen. et sp. nov. +; and (5) the first endopodal segment of legs 2 and 3 bears an inner spine in +e +. +lẚghtẚ +comb. nov. +, but this spine is absent in +e +. +mçnnẚçtçrum +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFFEFFE9FA93F958D12D1A89.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFFEFFE9FA93F958D12D1A89.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..958f83c8d77 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFFEFFE9FA93F958D12D1A89.xml @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Bathycopola karubar + +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 14 +, +15 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +♀ +(intact) (MNHN-IU-2018-1945) from +Styela squamçsa +Herdman, 1881; off +Tanimbar Is. +, +Indonesia +KARUBAR +Expedition Stn +CC57 +( +08°19’S +, +131°53’E +), depth +603-620 m +, +Bouchet +, +Kastoro +& +Métivier +coll., + +31 October 1991 + +. + + +1 ♀ +(dissected +paratype +, MNHN-IU-2014-17362) in +S +. +squamçsa +(MNHN-IT-2008- 8357 = +MNHN +S1 +/ +STY/285 +), +Tanimbar Is. +, +Indonesia +, KARUBAR +Expedition Stn CP +54 ( +08°21’S +, +131°43’E +), depth +836-869 m +, +Bouchet +, +Kastoro +& +Métivier +coll., + +30 October 1991 + +. + + + + + +FIG. 14. + +Bathycçpçla +karubar + + +gen. et sp. nov. + +, female. A, habitus, dorsal; B, habitus, right; C, genital somite and abdomen, ventral; D, right caudal ramus, ventral; E, antennule; F, antenna; G, labrum; H, mandible; I, maxillule; J, maxilliped. Scale bars: A, B, 0.2 mm; C, 0.1 mm; D, G-I, 0.02 mm; E, F, 0.05 mm. + + + + +FIG. 15. + +Bathycçpçla +karubar + + +gen. et sp. nov. + +, female. A, maxilla; B, leg 1; C, leg 2; D, leg 3; E, leg 4; F, leg 5; G, exopod of leg 5. Scale bars: A, 0.02 mm; B-E, G, 0.05 mm; F, 0.1 mm. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name refers to the “KARUBAR” Expedition to +Indonesia +during which the type specimens were collected. + + + + +Description of female. +Body ( +Fig. 14A, B +) stout; body length 1.99 mm; maximum width 567 μm across cepha- losome. Prosome cylindrical, consisting of cephalosome and 4 pedigerous somites, with almost parallel margins, distinctly longer than urosome, occupying 65% of total body length. Articulations between pedigerous somites incomplete; tergites weak, sparsely covered with fine setules; tergite of fourth pedigerous somite extended posterodorsally. Urosome 5-segmented, but fifth pedigerous somite obscurely articulated from prosome, directed posteroventrally. Genital somite ( +Fig. 14C +) longer than wide (300×255 μm); gradually narrowing posteriorly, with copulatory pore proximally on ventral surface. Three abdominal somites 182×200, 109×170, and 90×160 μm, respectively; anal operculum distinct, broad. Caudal rami small, extremely widely separated from each other; each ramus ( +Fig. 14D +) 2.68 times longer than wide, slightly curved, narrowing distally; armed with 3 setae (1 lateral, 1 subdistal, and 1 distal), and 3 distal spines; lateral seta positioned at 43% of ramus length; largest of 3 distal spines 24 μm long. Egg sac 745×482 μm, flattened, 2 eggs-thick, containing about +20 eggs +; each egg about 160 μm in diameter. + + +Rostrum represented by blunt anterior prominence of cephalosome. Antennule ( +Fig. 14 E +) slender, 307 μm long, 7-segmented; armature formula 2, 3, 5, 2, 5+aesthetasc, 2+aesthetasc, and 11+2 aesthetascs; setae slender and naked, aesthetascs very small, hardly visible. Antenna ( +Fig. 14F +) 3-segmented, excluding rudimentary coxa; first segment (basis) gradually broadening distally, 1.7 times longer than wide, distally bearing 1 slender spine (63 μm long) ornamented with spinules in distal half; second segment (first endopodal segment) 1.5 times longer than wide, 0.7 times as long as basis, with 1 seta on inner margin; third segment (second endopodal segment) 2.67 times longer than wide (72×27 μm), armed with 2 inner margin setae and 3 distal setae plus slender terminal claw, 0.8 times as long as second endopodal segment. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 14G +) much broader than long, strongly tapering, with deep and wide posteromedian incision and medially directed, tooth-like pointed process on each posterolateral apex. Mandible ( +Fig. 14H +) consisting of coxa and palp: medial margin of coxal gnathobase bearing 1 strong distal tooth and several spinule-like denticles along mid-region, and slender, spinulose process proximally; palp biramous, consisting of well-defined basis, exopod, and endopod, armed with 3 setae on basis, 4 setae on exopod, and 6 setae on endopod; all setae naked and distinct. Maxillule ( +Fig. 14I +) consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa bearing 9 setae on arthrite (5 broad and spiniform); palp trilobate with 2 large setae on outer lobe (representing original exopod), 4 setae on middle lobe (endopod), and 6 setae on medial lobe (basis); 1 seta (original enditic seta of coxa) present between arthrite and medial lobe. Maxilla ( +Fig. 15A +) consisting of syncoxa, basis, and 2-segmented endopod; syncoxa bearing 2 prominent endites, each tipped with 1 seta, distal endite located between syncoxa and basis; basis produced medially, armed with claw plus 2 setae; endopod small, bearing 1 seta on first segment and 5 on second. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 14J +) as unsegmented, digitiform lobe armed with 7 setae (2 apical and 5 on medial margin); ornamented with rows of minute spinules. + + +Legs 1-4 ( +Fig. 15 +B-E) biramous with 2-segmented rami; coxae lacking inner seta. Exopods and endopods armed only with spines, lacking setae. Outer spine on first exopodal segment large, longer than width of segment. First endopodal segment of legs 1-4 lacking inner seta. Exopods of legs 1-4 bearing same armature formula; endopods of legs 1-4 also bearing same armature formula, as follows: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CoxaBasisExopodEndopod
Leg 10-01-II-0; III, I, III0-0; I, II, I
Legs 2-40-01-0I-0; III, I, III0-0; I, II, I
+ + +Leg 5 ( +Fig. 15F +) consisting of lamellate protopod and small exopod: protopod 550×330 μm, nearly elliptical, ex- tending to posterior margin of first abdominal somite, bearing 1 small seta distally; exopod ( +Fig. 15G +) 2.9 times longer than wide (156×54 μm), slightly tapering, armed with 6 setae (1 on ventral margin, 1 subdistally, and 4 dis- tally). Leg 6 not observed. + + +Male. +Unknown. + + + + +Remarks. +The diagnostic features of + +Bathycçpçla +karubar + + +gen. et sp. nov. + +are: (1) the antennule is distinctly 7- segmented; (2) the mandibular palp bears a clearly defined exopod and endopod; (3) the maxilla has a 2-segmented endopod armed with 1 and 5 setae on the first and second segments, respectively; (4) all swimming legs lack the inner seta on the coxa; and (5) all endopods of legs 1-4 are armed with four spines on the distal segment. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFFEFFECFA93FDD8D0C21BFC.xml b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFFEFFECFA93FDD8D0C21BFC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7c105fb4214 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/87/3729879BFFFEFFECFA93FDD8D0C21BFC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species + + + +Author + +Kim, Il-Hoi +m@gwnu + + + +Author + +Boxshall, Geoff A. +m@gwnu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +1 + + +1 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1 +1175-5326 +4820443 +9C7C1723-73EB-4FBE-A47A-54627DEB8F93 + + + + + + + +Bathycopola + +gen. nov. + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Body rather stout. Prosome cylindrical, longer than urosome, incompletely 5-segmented; fourth pedigerous somite produced posterodorsally. Urosome 5-segmented; fifth pedigerous somite short, obscurely defined from prosome. Caudal ramus typically small, armed with 3 spines and 3 setae. Rostrum not developed. Antennule 7- or 8-segmented; first segment bearing 2 setae. Antenna 3- or 4-segmented; basis with 1 large spine distally; first endopodal segment with 1 seta on inner margin; second endopodal segment with several setae and slender terminal claw. Labrum bilobed; each lobe bearing 1 or 2 teeth on apex. Mandible consisting of coxa and palp; coxa with welldeveloped gnathobase bearing 1 tooth and several denticles on medial margin; palp biramous, consisting of basis, exopod and endopod, and armed with 3 setae on basis, 4 setae on exopod, and 5 or 6 setae on endopod. Maxillule consisting of precoxa and palp; precoxa bearing 9 setae on arthrite; palp unsegmented, but divisible into coxal endite bearing 1 seta, basis bearing 6 setae, exopod bearing 2 setae, and endopod bearing 3 to 6 setae. Maxilla consisting of syncoxa, basis, and 1- or 2-segmented endopod; syncoxa bearing 2 endites each tipped with 1 seta; basis with large claw in addition to setae; endopod with 5 or 6 setae. Maxilliped unsegmented with 4 to 7 setae. Legs 1-4 biramous; both rami armed mostly with spines. Exopods 2-segmented; second exopodal segment armed with 6 to 8 armature elements. Endopods 1- or 2-segmented; in 2-segmented condition, first segment lacking inner element and second segment armed with 4 or more armature elements. Leg 5 consisting of lamellate protopod and small exopod bearing 6 setae. Leg 6 represented by 3 spiniform elements on genital operculum + + + + +Type species. + +Bathycçpçla +karubar + + +gen. et sp. nov. + +by original designation. + + +Other included species +. + +Bathycçpçla +brevẚcaudata + +gen. et sp. nov. +, +BK dẚcarpae +gen. et sp. nov. +, and +BK set- ẚfera +gen. et. sp. nov. + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin +bath +(=deep) and +cçl +(=dwell), referring to the deep water (603 m to 5124 m) habitats occupied by species of this genus. Gender feminine. + + + + +Remarks. +Four new species are included in + +Bathycçpçla + + +gen. nov. + +and each is represented by only one or +two specimens +. One of these species is from the tropical West Pacific, and remaining three are from the Atlantic. They have a rather uniform body form and all possess 3 spines and 3 setae on the caudal ramus. + +Bathycçpçla + + +gen. nov. + +exhibits some of the most plesiomorphic character traits of any genus within the +Ascidicolidae +, in retaining a discrete endopod on the maxilla and in displaying the most complex setation on the mouthparts and swimming legs. All species of the genera +Ascẚdẚcçla +, +Styelẚcçla +, and +eamẚstyelẚcçla +gen. nov. +lack the inner seta on the coxa of legs 1-4, but some species of + +Bathycçpçla + + +gen. nov. + +retain this seta on the posterior swimming legs. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/29/B6/3729B68DF31951E6ACA7FF4A30670845.xml b/data/37/29/B6/3729B68DF31951E6ACA7FF4A30670845.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..43eac87bac4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/29/B6/3729B68DF31951E6ACA7FF4A30670845.xml @@ -0,0 +1,319 @@ + + + +Additions to the knowledge of the genus Eumenes Latreille, 1802 from China (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Eumeninae) + + + +Author + +Qin, Jiong +Chongqing Key Laboratory of Vector Insects, Institute of Entomology and Molecular Biology, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China + + + +Author + +Chen, Bin +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5227-7736 +Chongqing Key Laboratory of Vector Insects, Institute of Entomology and Molecular Biology, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China + + + +Author + +Li, Ting-Jing +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7175-2697 +Chongqing Key Laboratory of Vector Insects, Institute of Entomology and Molecular Biology, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China +ltjing1979@hotmail.com + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2023 + +2023-08-31 + + +96 + + +697 +714 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.96.107701 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.96.107701 +1314-2607-96-697 +D5020B71C9404F4188CA31E31D492DC1 +A1CA744E59415281939D7DF408CD518A + + + + +Eumenes aquilonius Yamane, 1977 +new record + + + + +Figs 21-30 + + + + +Eumenes rubronotatus aquilonius +Yamane, 1977b: 59; 1990: 148; +Kurzenko 1995 +: 321. + + +Eumenes aquilonius +: +Kim and Yamane 2001 +: 139, 143, 153; +Yoon and Kim 2014 +: 234. + + + +Material examined. + + +2♀ +, +China +, +Inner Mongolia +, +Alxa Leaguei +, +Ho-lan Mountains +, +38°58'08"N +, +105°51'32"E +, + +2000 m + +, +2010.vii.29 +, +Fangzhou Ma +(CNU) + +; + +1♂ +, +China +, +Jilin Province +, +Linjiang City +, +Naozhi Town +, +38°12'50"N +, +105°24'07"E +, + +510 m + +, +2012.vii.8 +, +Xin Zhou +(CNU) + +; + +2♀ +, +China +, +Sichuan Province +, +Guangyuan City +, +Qingchuan County +, +Qingxi Town +, +Pingqiao Village +, +32°28'51"N +, +104°51'36"E +, + +1200 m + +, +22.VII.2018 +, +Xue Zhang +(CNU) + +; + +1♀ +1♂ +, +China +, +Sichuan Province +, +Langzhong City +, +Boshu Hui Autonomous County +, +Qingzhen Village +, +31°33'54"N +, +106°03'36"E +, + +608 m + +, +2020.vii.18 +, +Jie Chen +(CNU) + +; + +1♀ +, +China +, +Sichuan Province +, +Chengdu City +, +Dayi County +, +Xieyuan Town +, +30°37'12"N +, +103°20'49"E +, + +500 m + +, +2018.viii.13 +, +Huachan Wang +(CNU) + +; + +1♂ +, +China +, +Shanxi Province +, +Hanzhong City +, +Nanzhen County +, +Hongmiao Town Qunfu Village +, +32°47'38"N +, +106°54'14"E +, + +484 m + +, +2017.vii.16 +, +Pan Huang +(CNU) + +. + + + +Diagnosis. + +Female. +Body length 9.6-10.4 mm; black, with yellow markings (Fig. +21 +): interantennal spot, gena, lateral side of pronotum, pronotum anteriorly, band of metanotum, tegula mostly (Fig. +25 +), fore tibia largely, apical bands of both T1 and T2, and lateral spots of T2; body with setae sparse and short, those on head longer than scape width; clypeus entirely black, longer than wide, with short setae (Fig. +23 +); dorsal view (Figs +28 +, +29 +), T1 densely punctate, length of T1 less than 4 +x +its apical width and abruptly swollen before middle; T2 sparsely punctate, punctures obviously smaller than those of T1, apical lamella of T2 not reflex and weakly depressed in the middle (Fig. +30 +); lateral view (Fig. +27 +), basal angle of metasomal segment 2 obtuse, T2 swollen in the middle, with transverse wrinkles and weakly depressed in its preapical part; wings pale brown. + + + +Figures 21-30. + +Eumenes aquilonius + +Yamane, 1977. ♀ ( +21, 23, 25, 27-30 +) ♂ ( +22, 24, 26 +) +21, 22 +habitus (dorsal view) +23, 24 +clypeus (frontal view) +25 +head and pronotum (dorsal view) +26 +antenna +27 +metasomal segments 2-6 (lateral view) +28 +T2 (dorsal view) +29 +T1 (dorsal view) +30 +lamella of T2 apical margin (dorsal view). + + + +Male. +Body length 7.8-8.4 mm (Fig. +22 +). Sculpture, setae, and coloration similar to female except as follows: clypeus entirely yellow (Fig. +24 +); apex of A13 reaching basal fourth of A10 (Fig. +26 +). + + + +Distribution. +China (Inner Mongolia, Jilin, Sichuan, Shanxi); Russia; Korea; Japan. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2A/74/372A74A20F0541C1DC3AF29A987C8E44.xml b/data/37/2A/74/372A74A20F0541C1DC3AF29A987C8E44.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f7b8a06f09b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2A/74/372A74A20F0541C1DC3AF29A987C8E44.xml @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + +New records of an alien aphid species Tinocallis (Sappocallis) takachihoensis from countries in central and northern Europe (Hemiptera, Aphididae, Calaphidinae) + + + +Author + +Kanturski, Mariusz + + + +Author + +Lee, Yerim + + + +Author + +Depa, Lukasz + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2018 + +730 + + +1 +16 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21599 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.730.21599 +1313-2970-730-1 +9ADE43EAA224445B8F78C754059B1E11 + + + + +Genus +Tinocallis Matsumura, 1919 +Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 + + + + +Tinocallis +Matsumura, 1919: 100. + + +Lutaphis +Shinji, 1924: 346. + + + +Diagnosis. +This genus can be recognized by having narrow transversely elongated or slit-like secondary rhinaria on ANT III, and ABD III, V, and VII with laterally displaced spinal dorsal setae. Abdominal tergites I and II usually have finger-like dorsal tubercles. + + +Type species. + +Tinocallis ulmiparvifoliae +Matsumura, 1919. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2A/F5/372AF5AF40F25F7AAECF45AEAD3535AD.xml b/data/37/2A/F5/372AF5AF40F25F7AAECF45AEAD3535AD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..443c9454c0b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2A/F5/372AF5AF40F25F7AAECF45AEAD3535AD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,460 @@ + + + +Elsholtzia zhongyangii (Lamiaceae), a new species from Sichuan, China + + + +Author + +Jin, Xin-Jie +College of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325035, China + + + +Author + +Huang, Yue +College of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325035, China + + + +Author + +Wei, Yu-Kun +Eastern China Conservation Centre for Wild Endangered Plant Resources, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China + + + +Author + +Ma, Qing +College of Biology and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou 310015, China + + + +Author + +Liu, Lu-Xian +Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China + + + +Author + +Fu, Zhi-Xi +College of Life Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China + + + +Author + +Wu, Gui-Fang +College of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325035, China + + + +Author + +Zhang, Yong-Hua +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2676-9059 +College of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325035, China +zhangyhua@wzu.edu.cn + + + +Author + +Li, Pan +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-7740 +Laboratory of Systematic & Evolutionary Botany and Biodiversity, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China +panli_zju@126.com + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2022 + +2022-03-22 + + +193 + + +77 +88 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.193.80327 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.193.80327 +1314-2003-193-77 +11A21AF06F9551038FBA0E0D1F8C3561 + + + + +Elsholtzia zhongyangii P. Li & X.J. Jin +sp. nov. + + + + +Type +. + + + +China +. +Sichuan +: +Yajiang County +, +Agakeyong +, +30°2.54'N +, +100°15.01'E +, + +3237 m +a.s.l. + +, +18 Sep 2018 +, +Pan Li +LP185940 +( +holotype +, ZM; isotypes CSH, CDBI, HZU, KUN, PE, SZ, WZUH). (Fig. +3 +and Fig. +5 +) + + + + +Figure 3. + +Elsholtzia zhongyangii + +sp. nov. +A +blooming plant +B +front view of inflorescence +C +dorsal view of inflorescence +D +side view of inflorescence +E +cyme +F +bract +G +flower +H +side view of flower +I +front part of flower +J +villous outside corolla +K +dissected corolla +L +pilose annulate inside +M +ovary 4-cleft, 1 nectary rises on the edge of the ovary +N +outside of calyx +O +nutlet (with mucilage) +P +adaxial surface of leaf +Q +abaxial surface of leaf. Photos by Xin-Jie Jin & Pan Li. + + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Elsholtzia zhongyangii + +is most similar to +E. feddei f. feddei +morphologically in having calyx villous, spinescent calyx apex, two long and three short calyces and acute leaf apices, but differs from the latter by its smaller corolla (3.2-3.5 mm vs. 4.5-5.3 mm), bract stalked (ca. 1.2 mm vs. sessile) and bract glabrous, except margin ciliate (vs. villous, especially on veins abaxially, glabrous adaxially). + + + +Figure 4. +Four other sympatric or morphologically similar species +A + +Elsholtzia ciliata + +B + +Elsholtzia splendens + +C +Elsholtzia feddei f. feddei +D +Elsholtzia feddei f. robusta +. Photos by Pan Li. + + + + +Description. + +Annual herbs, erect. Stems 10-45 cm tall, tawny purple; pilose or pilulose, multi-branched above base, branch apex with inflorescence, internode 0.5-4.8 cm long. Leaves ovate triangular, ovate oblong to oblong lanceolate or lanceolate, 0.7-3.6 cm long and 0.3-1.7 cm wide, apex acute, base broadly or narrowly cuneate, extending to petiole, with dense glandular. Leaves villous adaxially, villous especially on veins abaxially. Leaf margin serrate, obtuse, occasionally acute, serrate margin usually purple. Inflorescence a terminal spike, secund, ca. 0.9-7.9 cm, flowers 8-14 at each node of the inflorescence (a pair of cymes); bracts subcircular to broadly ovate, ca. 1.2-3.2 +x +1.1-4.5 mm, caudate cuspidate, apex ca. 0.7-2.1 mm, glabrous, except margin ciliate, with dense glandular, dark magenta at maturity, bract stalked, ca. 1.2 mm. Pedicel ca. 2 mm long, enlarged at apex, glabrous. Calyx ca. 2.0-3.2 mm, teeth 5, teeth triangular, two long and three short, apex spinescent,white hirsute, margin ciliate. Corolla deep purple, 3.2-3.5 mm, slightly incurved, narrowly funnel-shaped, with hairs transparent and purple interlaced, villous outside, pilose annulate inside, the base of the corolla tube is about 0.5 mm wide, widening upwards, throat about 1.2 mm wide, upper lip emarginated; middle lobe of lower lip semicircular, lateral lobes subcircular, shorter than middle lobe. Stamens 4, protruding from corolla, the anterior longer than the posterior, filaments are glabrous, anthers purple-black. Style longer than stamens at maturity, exserted, 2-cleft, with lobe equal, linear. Ovary 4-cleft; disc persistent, 1 nectary rises on the edge of the ovary. Nutlets 4, brown, oblong, ca. 1.1 mm long, 0.7 mm in diameter, surface becoming mucilaginous when wetted. + + + +Figure 5. +Illustration of + +Elsholtzia zhongyangii + +Pan Li & X.J. Jin +A +the whole plant +B +cyme +C +bract +D +outside of calyx +E +flowers and villous outside corolla +F +dissected corolla +G +pilose annulate inside. Drawn by Xin-Jie Jin. + + + + +Phenology. +Flowering and fruiting from September to December. + + +Chinese name. +Zhong-yang-xiang-ru (钟扬香薷). + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet is named in memory of Prof. Yang Zhong, a Chinese botanist who was dedicated to botanical research and education in Xizang (Tibet), China. + + +Distribution, ecology and habitat. +- Endemic to China, Sichuan Province, Yajiang County (Wolongsi, Weidi, Agakeyong, Jialulongba and Zhusang), Litang County (Wenquan), Ganzi County, Dege County (Ezhi), Luhuo County (Zhuwo) and Batang County. Growing in grassland on mountain slopes or even along the road, at an elevation of 3000-4000 m. + + +Conservation status. + +The known localities of + +Elsholtzia zhongyangii + +are not in protected areas. During our field surveys between September 2012 and December 2021, populations in Wolongsi, Weidi, Agakeyong, Jialulongba and Zhusang of Yajiang County were found. Specimen records show that it also occurs in Litang County (Wenquan), Ganzi County, Dege County (Ezhi), Luhuo County (Zhuwo) and Batang County. Taking into consideration that it was distributed along the roadsides like weeds, we believe that it should have a much wider distribution than what is now known. Due to its wide distribution range and large population size, + +Elsholtzia zhongyangii + +is here recommended as Least Concern (LC), according to the IUCN Categories ( +IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee 2019 +). + + + + +Additional specimens examined +( +paratypes +). + + + +China +. +Sichuan +: +Yajiang County +, +Wolongsi +, +30°2.54'N +, +101°15.08'E +, + +3293 m +a.s.l. + +, +26 August 2015 + +, + + +Pan Li +& +Xinglv Xie + +LP150689 +(PE, KUN, WZUH); +Yajiang County +, +Weidi +, +30°3.13'N +, +101°12.66'E +, + +3028 m +a.s.l. + +, +18 September 2018 + +, + + +Pan Li + +LP185942 +(PE, WZUH); +Yajiang County +, +Jialulongba +, +30°2.94'N +, +101°18.42'E +, + +3760 m +a.s.l. + +, +26 August 2015 + +, + + +Pan Li +& +Xinglv Xie + +LP150686 +(PE, KUN, CDBI, SZ, CSH, WZUH); +Yajiang County +, +Zhusang +, +19 September 2012 + +, + + +Pan Li +PNLI20120191 + +(WZUH); +Litang County +, +Wenquan +, + +4000 m +a.s.l. + +, +11 September 1974 + +, + +Y.Q. He +& +H.J. Wang +8281 (WUK); +Ganzi County +, +10 September 1951 + +, + + +W.G. Hu +13099 + +(WUK); +Dege County +, +Ezhi +, + +1900 m +a.s.l. + +, +31 August 1979 + +, + + +Dege +team 0685 + +(SM); +Luhuo County +, +Zhuwo +, + +3700 m +a.s.l. + +, +2 August 1974 + +, + + +Sichuan +vegetation team 07693 + +(CDBI); +Batang County +, + +3100 m +a.s.l. + +, +2 September 1973 + +, + +Sichuan +vegetation team 3971 + +(CDBI). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2A/FD/372AFD372ED6C76059EE1A65F1AF5AC1.xml b/data/37/2A/FD/372AFD372ED6C76059EE1A65F1AF5AC1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5f59316687f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2A/FD/372AFD372ED6C76059EE1A65F1AF5AC1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + + +Gelis kiesenwetteri ( +Foerster +, 1850) + + + + + +Pezomachus kiesenwetteri +Foerster +, 1850 + + +bellicosus +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +debeyii +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +egregius +( +Foerster +, 1850, +Pezomachus +) + + +costatus +(Bridgmanm, 1886, +Pezomachus +) + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2B/2A/372B2AD385DEA4D2BDC44CC3F54D4828.xml b/data/37/2B/2A/372B2AD385DEA4D2BDC44CC3F54D4828.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6ce2ba11e38 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2B/2A/372B2AD385DEA4D2BDC44CC3F54D4828.xml @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ + + + +The ant tribe Tetramoriini (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). The genus Tetramorium Mayr in the Malagasy region and in the New World. + + + +Author + +Bolton, B. + +text + + +Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology + + +1979 + +38 + + +129 +181 + + + + +http://atbi.biosci.ohio-state.edu/HymOnline/reference-full.html?id=6435 + +journal article +6435 + + + + +Tetramorium steinheili Forel + + + +(Figs 12, 15) + +Tetramorium (Xiphomyrmex) steinheili Forel, 1892: 520 +. Syntype workers, females, Madagascar: Foret d'Andrangoloaka, confins de l'lmerina {Sikora) (MHN, Geneva) [examined]. + +Worker. TL 4.3 - 4.4, HL 1.00, HW 0.94 - 0.96, CI 94 - 96, SL 0.72 - 0.76, SI 77 - 80, PW 0.68 - 0.72, AL 118 - 1.20 (2 measured). +Mandibles striate; median clypeal carina sharp. Extensions of frontal carinae long and strong, slightly sinuate from origin to behind the level of the eyes and then strongly divergent, directed towards the occipital corners. Pronotum and mesonotum obtusely marginate at the sides, in dorsal view separated by an impression. Metanotal groove absent, not impressed in profile. Propodeal spines long and stout, metapleural lobes elongate-triangular, acute or blunted apically. Petiole node anteroposteriorly compressed, in dorsal view much broader than long. Dorsum of head regularly longitudinally rugulose, the alitrunk more coarsely rugose, predominantly longitudinal but the rugae meandering and with a few crossmeshes present. Pedicel and gaster unsculptured, smooth and shining. All dorsal surfaces of head and body with numerous fine, erect to suberect hairs. Leading (anterior) edges of antennal scapes with short, projecting, suberect to subdecumbent hairs which are shorter than the maximum width of the scape. Colour reddish brown, the gaster paler than the alitrunk. + +In overall appearance +steinheili +resembles some of the members of the tortuosum-group, but the unsculptured pedicel segments and the fact that the petiole is distinctly anteroposteriorly compressed seem to indicate that the affinities of +steinheili +are with +humbloti +and its relatives. Despite this I feel that there is a distinct possibility that this species may truly be related to +andrei +and its allies, and convergent upon the weitzeckeri-group in pedicel structure. + + + +Material examined +Madagascar: Andranobe, Route d'Andriamena (A. Peyrieras); Bemanevika, Souspref. Bealanana {A. Peyrieras). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2B/6C/372B6C9F1991D692CBA0B527520AD35A.xml b/data/37/2B/6C/372B6C9F1991D692CBA0B527520AD35A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..20aaa214ed0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2B/6C/372B6C9F1991D692CBA0B527520AD35A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +Revision of Zosteragathis Sharkey of Thailand (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae, Agathidini) + + + +Author + +Sharkey, Michael J. +S- 225 Agricultural Science Center N., 1100 S. Limestone University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA +msharkey@uky.edu + + + +Author + +Chapman, Eric G. +S- 225 Agricultural Science Center N., 1100 S. Limestone University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA + +text + + +Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift + + +2018 + +2018-08-14 + + +65 + + +2 + + +225 +253 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.65.25772 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.65.25772 +1860-1324-2-225 +5A043F9D93FA4DD7873A1A0101C849FE +D2C3A41086E452F783AC74CDB886C141 +1401567 + + + + +Zosteragathis eukos Sharkey +sp. n. + + + +Etymology. + +Eukos +is Greek for milky white; here it is a reference to the color of the base of the hind tibia. + + + +Diagnosis. + +T2 almost entirely melanic and longer than wide; fore wing lacking infuscate patch posterior to stigma; similar to + +Z. annuliferus + +( +Achterberg and Long 2010 +) but dimensions of T1 and T2 differ. + + + +Description. +Body length 4.9 mm. Ovipositor length/body length ratio = 0.8. Interantennal space with a flat triangular elevation that narrows to a short ridge posteriorly and then divides into two short indistinct carinae that approach the median ocellus. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres. Third labial (penultimate) palpomere minute, barely visible and much smaller than apical palpomere. Scutellar groove with 3 longitudinal ridges. Fore tibia lacking thickened spines; mid tibia with 3 pegs; hind tibia with 10 pegs. + + +Specimens examined. + + +Holotype +female, +THAILAND +, +Suphanburi +, +Pu Toei NP +, car park, Pu Krathing waterfall, +14°48.922'N +, +99°27.52'E +, + +200 m + +elev., +Malaise trap +, +21-28.iv.2009 +(H689, T4610), +Wangkum +, leg. + + +For a map of examined material, see: https://bit.ly/2I4SQEY + + +Figure 4. + +Zosteragathis eukos + +holotype +female. +a) +lateral habitus. +b) +wings. +c) +anterodorsal head. +d) +lateral head. +e) +lateral mesosoma. +f) +dorsal thorax. +g) +propodeum and metasomal terga 1-3. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2B/81/372B81A5118A5BABBE7C4C37D258E811.xml b/data/37/2B/81/372B81A5118A5BABBE7C4C37D258E811.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7bfcc549fee --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2B/81/372B81A5118A5BABBE7C4C37D258E811.xml @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + +Moths (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of Delhi, India: An illustrated checklist based on museum specimens and surveys + + + +Author + +Komal, J. +National Pusa Collection, Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India + + + +Author + +Shashank, P. R. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8177-6091 +National Pusa Collection, Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India +spathour@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Sondhi, Sanjay +Titli Trust, 49 Rajpur Road Enclave, Dhoran Khas, near IT Park, P. O. Gujrada, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India + + + +Author + +Madan, Sohail +Conservation Education Centre - ABWLS, Delhi Asola Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary, Near Karni Singh Shooting Range, New Delhi, India + + + +Author + +Sondhi, Yash +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7704-3944 +Department of Biology, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, United States of America + + + +Author + +Meshram, Naresh M. +ICAR- Central Citrus Research Institute, Nagpur, India + + + +Author + +Anooj, S. S. +National Pusa Collection, Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2021 + +2021-10-06 + + +9 + + +73997 +73997 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e73997 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e73997 +1314-2828-9-e73997 +27E7CF017F40580CAC90AD41F6C3694C + + + + +Scirpophaga sp. + + + +Notes +Present study + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2B/90/372B90713CF4879DB05B63A3ABB318F5.xml b/data/37/2B/90/372B90713CF4879DB05B63A3ABB318F5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b2cfc6370ce --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2B/90/372B90713CF4879DB05B63A3ABB318F5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Orthocentrus protervus Holmgren, 1858 + + + +Distribution +England + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2B/D9/372BD95944E9586D87D4907BB7A46999.xml b/data/37/2B/D9/372BD95944E9586D87D4907BB7A46999.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..56ffda1e41c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2B/D9/372BD95944E9586D87D4907BB7A46999.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Floristic inventory and distribution characteristics of algific talus slopes in a specific area of forest biodiversity in South Korea + + + +Author + +Lee, Jong-Won +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-8396 +Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Yun, Ho-Geun +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Hwang, Tae Young +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Kyungmin +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Jung, Se-Hoon +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +An, Jong Bin +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea +ajb8825@korea.kr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-12-18 + + +11 + + +113952 +113952 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 +1314-2828-11-e113952 +5B963235F71B550FA1E3BC1F0E590B10 + + + + +Muhlenbergia japonica Steud., 1854 + + + +Distribution +China to Russian Far East and Japan + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2C/01/372C01C3636C5ECD9A708ED8FB1B139B.xml b/data/37/2C/01/372C01C3636C5ECD9A708ED8FB1B139B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..796173b9939 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2C/01/372C01C3636C5ECD9A708ED8FB1B139B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,490 @@ + + + +A taxonomic revision of the whitefish of lakes Brienz and Thun, Switzerland, with descriptions of four new species (Teleostei, Coregonidae) + + + +Author + +Selz, Oliver M. +Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Centre for Ecology, Evolution & Biogeochemistry, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland & Aquatic Ecology and Evolution, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2210-5909 +oliver.selz@eawag.ch + + + +Author + +Doenz, Carmela J. +Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Centre for Ecology, Evolution & Biogeochemistry, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland & Aquatic Ecology and Evolution, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Vonlanthen, Pascal +Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Centre for Ecology, Evolution & Biogeochemistry, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland & Aquabios GmbH, Les Fermes 57, 1792 Cordast, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Seehausen, Ole +Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Centre for Ecology, Evolution & Biogeochemistry, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland & Aquatic Ecology and Evolution, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +989 + + +79 +162 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.989.32822 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.989.32822 +1313-2970-989-79 +F78F6D879DDB4CD98E4C60E4883A59B6 +65AB71A5B3985F5E9FBF8CD56BC96143 + + + + + +C. brienzii Selz, +Doenz +, Vonlanthen & Seehausen + +sp. nov. + + + + +Coregonus +"Felchen": +Kirchhofer 1990 +; +Kirchhofer 1995 +(see also synonymy of +C. alpinus +and +C. fatioi +) + + +Coregonus +"Large type": +Maurer and Guthruf 2005 +; + +Mueller +et al. 2007 + +(see also synonymy of +C. fatioi +and +C. alpinus +) + + +Coregonus +sp. "Balchen": +Hudson et al. 2011 +, +2013 +, +2016 +; +Ingram et al. 2012 +; +Vonlanthen et al. 2012 +, +2015 +; + +Vonlanthen and +Periat +2013 + +(see also synonymy of +C. alpinus +and +C. steinmanni +) + + +Coregonus +sp. "Balchen 2": + +Doenz +et al. 2018 + +(see also synonymy of +C. steinmanni +) + + + +Material examined. + + + + +Holotype + +. + +NMBE-1077126 +, +Switzerland +, +Lake Brienz +( +46°43'N +, +7°57'E +), 223 mm SL, +female +. + + + + + + +Paratypes + +. + +NMBE-1077116-1077125 +, +NMBE-1077127-1077128 +, +Switzerland +, +Lake Brienz +( +46°43'N +, +7°57'E +), N = +12 +, 118-226 mm SL. + + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Coregonus brienzii + +is a medium-sized whitefish with moderate pigmentation of all fins and body; light to dark greenish blue colour on the flanks above the lateral line; moderate to many pigmented small dots on the scales along the flank and the dorsum; deep bodied; stout caudal peduncle; short head; moderately large eye with a moderately thick and triangular shaped eye socket. + + + +Differential diagnosis. + + +Coregonus brienzii + +occurs only in Lake Brienz and we therefore compare the characters of this species specifically with the species of Lake Brienz. Differential diagnoses against + +C. albellus + +, + +C. alpinus + +, and + +C. fatioi + +are given under those +species' +accounts. + + + +Description. + +General appearance is shown in Figure 8. Morphological and meristic characters of both sexes can be found in Table +7 +and Suppl. material 1: Table S6 and first- and second-best ratios for both sexes combined can be found in Table +11 +. The description is valid for both sexes. + + +Shape +: Moderately deep bodied with greatest body depth anterior of the dorsal fin. Dorsal profile moderately arched compared to ventral profile. The dorsal profile from the tip of snout to the anterior origin of dorsal fin is moderately convex, whereas the ventral profile is slightly arched such that is almost straight or slightly convex from the interorbital area to the pelvic fin origin. In some specimens the ventral profile and dorsal profile are similar and only slightly arched. Head moderately short. Mouth is rather thin (i.e., width of upper and lower jaw), moderately short and terminal to sub-terminal. The snout can range from almost equally wide as deep to wider than deep, and is only moderately pronounced, since the tip of the snout can sometimes be fleshy and roundish. Moderately large eye. The eye-socket is thick and triangular (i.e., sickle-shaped). Pectoral fin moderately tapered. The anterior unbranched ray of the erected dorsal fin is almost vertically straight with an approx. 70-80° angle to the body axis and is only bent slightly posteriorly at the end of the ray. Caudal peduncle is moderately stout and short. Caudal fin forked and sometimes slightly asymmetrical with the dorsal part being longer. Unbranched ray of anal fin mostly straight and only sometimes slightly bent posteriorly. Anal fin longest anteriorly and progressively shortening posteriorly with the outer margin of the anal fin mostly slightly concave and only rarely straight. + + +Meristics +: Many gill rakers that are moderately long. + + +Colour +: Pigmentation of fins and body overall moderate in live specimens. The pectoral fin is mostly translucent and only rarely moderately pigmented at the median to distal parts of the fin. The dorsal, adipose, pelvic, anal, and caudal fins are moderately pigmented. Silvery appearance along the flanks with moderate to many pigmented small dots on the scales. The dots are found along the flank and the dorsum. The distribution of the dots is bound to the scale patterning such that the dots are found at the edge of the scales or at the boundary point of two scales (as can be found for the species of + +C. alpinus + +and + +C. fatioi + +from both lakes and + +C. steinmanni + +from Lake Thun). Dorsally above the lateral line the silvery appearance changes to a light (e.g., RGB (135, 236, 179)) or darker greenish blue colour (e.g., RGB (7,168,125)). The dorsal part of the head is moderately pigmented. The snout around the nostrils is +moderately +pigmented with a gap of very weak pigmentation posteriorly of the nostrils up to the height of the middle of the eyes. The pre-operculum and operculum are silvery with one black dot on the lower margin of the pre-operculum. For a comparison +to +the main colouration found in the other species see Suppl. material 1: Figure S8. Preserved specimens are pale in colouration with similar pigmentation as described for live specimens. The silvery, translucent, not coloured or unpigmented parts of the body become brown-yellowish (e.g., RGB (239, 210, 40)), whereas the pigmented parts are conserved and the coloured parts (dorsally above the lateral line) become brownish (e.g., RGB (186, 140, 100)). + + + +Distribution and notes on biology. + + +Coregonus brienzii + +is found in Lake Brienz ( +46°43'N +, +7°57'E +) which is connected with Lake Thun through the river Aare at Interlaken. Our previous genetic work ( + +Doenz +et al. 2018 + +) suggested that + +C. brienzii + +is the same species as + +C. steinmanni + +and that it together with the other three species, + +C. alpinus + +, + +C. fatioi + +, and + +C. albellus + +, is present in both lakes. All four species displayed the same genetic relationships in both lakes (i.e., the same hierarchical grouping into distinct genotypic clusters and similar extends of genetic divergence). However, recent analyses of whole-genome data (De-Kayne et al. unpublished) revealed, that specimens of + +C. steinmanni + +from Lake Thun do not group with those of + +C. brienzii + +, whereas those of the other three species from both lakes do cluster together. Instead the whole genome data suggests that + +C. steinmanni + +clusters closer to + +C. alpinus + +from Lake Thun - as has previously been shown with genetic data ( + +Doenz +et al. 2018 + +) - and that + +C. brienzii + +clusters closer to + +C. fatioi + +from Lake Brienz. Interestingly, we also find morphological relationships to differ between the lakes; in Lake Thun + +C. steinmanni + +groups in morphospace with + +C. alpinus + +, whereas in Lake Brienz + +C. brienzii + +groups in morphospace with + +C. fatioi + +. + + + +Coregonus brienzii + +most likely feeds on a mix of benthic prey and zooplankton (stomach content: +Maurer and Guthruf 2005 +; + +Mueller +et al. 2007 + +; isotopic signatures: +Selz 2008 +; +Hudson 2011 +) and has a moderatly fast growth rate ( + +Mueller +et al. 2007 + +). It has to be noted that the work by +Kirchhofer (1995) +, +Maurer and Guthruf (2005) +and + +Mueller +et al. (2007) + +did not distinguish between all species in Lake Brienz and thus lumped different species together into few groups. +Maurer and Guthruf (2005) +and + +Mueller +et al. (2007) + +differentiated between "small-type" and "large-type" whitefish based on cohort-specific threshold values for length-at age. Based on morphology and ecology +Kirchhofer (1995) +differentiated in Lake Brienz between "Felchen" (comprising most likely of + +C. alpinus + +, + +C. fatioi + +and + +C. brienzii + +) and "Brienzlig" and "Winter-Brienzlig" (comprising of summer- and winter-spawning specimens of + +C. albellus + +). Also, the isotopic work by +Selz (2008) +, and +Hudson (2011) +did not yet differentiate between + +C. fatioi + +and + +C. brienzii + +. The relative species abundances in the pelagic and benthic habitat from a habitat-stratified random sampling of Lake Brienz (mid-September 2011: Vonlanthen et al. 2013) shows, that + +C. brienzii + +is absent from the benthic habitat and is present in the moderately deep pelagic waters (30 m; +N += 1) ( + +Doenz +et al. 2018 + +). It is to note that the habitat-stratified random sampling data only covers a short period of time (one month in late summer) and it is thus not clear how the species is distributed spatially through the rest of the year. + +Coregonus brienzii + +resembles phenotypically + +C. fatioi + +. The average size (total length) at 3 years of age for specimens in this study is 254 + 14 mm (N = 8) (Suppl. material 1: Figures S5, S6). The size at 3 years of age of + +C. brienzii + +is similar to that of + +C. fatioi + +, slightly smaller than that of + +C. alpinus + +and consider +ably +larger than that of + +C. albellus + +(Suppl. material 1: Figure S6). + +Coregonus brienzii + +has a short spawning season in late December (Suppl. material 1: Figure S3; + +Doenz +et al. 2018 + +). + +Coregonus brienzii + +spawns mostly in moderately shallow waters of 10 m down to 60 m and rarely to 100 m (Suppl. material 1: Figure S3; +Bittner 2009 +; + +Doenz +et al. 2018 + +). The spawning season and depth of + +C. brienzii + +overlaps largely with that + +C. fatioi + +. + + + +Etymology. + +The specific epithet + +brienzii + +is the genitive of +Brienz +. We name this species after Lake Brienz, as it is the only endemic whitefish species known for Lake Brienz. + + + +Common name. +None. We suggest the German name "Brienzer Kleinbalchen" + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2C/0D/372C0D1AD8245733A84525564F49A56F.xml b/data/37/2C/0D/372C0D1AD8245733A84525564F49A56F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..05e2ee8b688 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2C/0D/372C0D1AD8245733A84525564F49A56F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +An island in a sea of sand: a first checklist of the herpetofauna of the Serra da Neve inselberg, southwestern Angola + + + +Author + +Marques, Mariana P. +0000-0002-1712-2632 +Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh PA 15213, USA & CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485 - 661 Vairão, Portugal & BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485 - 661, Vairão, Portugal & Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 1021, 4169 - 007 Porto, Portugal + + + +Author + +Parrinha, Diogo +0000-0002-1302-025X +CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485 - 661 Vairão, Portugal & BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485 - 661, Vairão, Portugal & Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 1021, 4169 - 007 Porto, Portugal + + + +Author + +Lopes-Lima, Manuel +0000-0002-2761-7962 +CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485 - 661 Vairão, Portugal & BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485 - 661, Vairão, Portugal + + + +Author + +Tiutenko, Arthur +0000-0001-5952-4923 +Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schlossplatz 4, 91054 Erlangen, Germany + + + +Author + +Bauer, Aaron M. +https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 6839 - 8025 +Department of Biology and Center for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Stewardship, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085, USA + + + +Author + +Ceríaco, Luis M. P. +https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 0591 - 9978 +CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485 - 661 Vairão, Portugal & BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485 - 661, Vairão, Portugal & Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Museu Nacional, Departamento de Vertebrados, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940 - 040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2024 + +2024-05-14 + + +1201 + + +167 +217 + + + +journal article +10.3897/zookeys.1201.120750 +23C7E6E7-AE73-4685-AEDA-26DEB0EE0068 + + + + + +Panaspis mocamedensis +Ceríaco, Heinicke, Parker, Marques & Bauer, 2020 + + + + + +Records. + + +2 km +N of Maylowe [ + +- 13.8280 +, +13.2625 + +, +820 m +] ( +MB +03 - 001532, 001533). + + + + +Comments. + + + +P. mocamedensis + +is endemic to +Namibe Province +( +Ceríaco et al. 2020 b +). This species tendentially prefer more open and dry micro-habitats than their Angolan congeners. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2C/6C/372C6C047F805D8FB1B7002D2EF7A263.xml b/data/37/2C/6C/372C6C047F805D8FB1B7002D2EF7A263.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ae967735eb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2C/6C/372C6C047F805D8FB1B7002D2EF7A263.xml @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + +Nomenclatural changes in Coleus and Plectranthus (Lamiaceae): a tale of more than two genera + + + +Author + +Paton, Alan J. + + + +Author + +Mwanyambo, Montfort + + + +Author + +Govaerts, Rafael H. A. + + + +Author + +Smitha, Kokkaraniyil + + + +Author + +Suddee, Somran + + + +Author + +Phillipson, Peter B. + + + +Author + +Wilson, Trevor C. + + + +Author + +Forster, Paul I. + + + +Author + +Culham, Alastair + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2019 + +129 + + +1 +158 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.129.34988 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.129.34988 +1314-2003-129-1 +BF57C6B3C3065AEE9B4B3D47189C908F +3382366 + + + + +Coleus bracteatus Dunn, Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 8: 158. 1913 +Fig. 4D + + + + +Plectranthus bracteatus +(Dunn) Suddee, Kew Bull. 59: 399. 2004. Type: China, Yunnan, Puerh, 1350 m, Henry 13498 (lectotype: K, designated by +Suddee et al. 2004 +; isolectotype: NY). + + +Plectranthus saphinensis +Phuong, Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 67: 1131. 1982. Type: Vietnam, Sa Phin, Prov. Ha Tuyen, 15 Sept. 1977, Phuong 294B (holotype: HN; isotype: HN). + + + +Distribution. +China: Yunnan to Indo-China. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B643FF974E2376D69811F5AE.xml b/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B643FF974E2376D69811F5AE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d8d12cf4658 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B643FF974E2376D69811F5AE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ + + + +New amphipods of hydrothermal vent environments on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Azores Triple junction zone + + + +Author + +Bellan-Santini, Denise + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2007 + +2007-06-30 + + +41 + + +9 - 12 + + +567 +596 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930701262537 + +journal article +10.1080/00222930701262537 +1464-5262 +4669830 + + + + + + +Podosirus vaderi + +n. sp. + + + + + +( +Figures 1 +, +2 +) + + + +Type +locality. + +Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 37 +° +17.398 +9 +N, 32 +° +16.642 +9 +W, Lucky Strike site, +1680 m +. + + +Material examined. + +SEAHMA 1, +PL 187-09 +, + +12 August 2002 + +, slurp gun 5, Lucky Strike site, + +1680 m + +, +4 specimens +: +1 female +with oostegites, +holotype +MNHN +Am-7463; 3 exemplaries of 6, 4 and +4 mm +, +paratypes +MNHN +Am-7464 + +. + + +Description. +Holotype +female +5 mm +, with oostegites. Body slender, compressed, last segment of mesosome with a small dorsal process. Segments 1–3 of metasome with a small dorsal process. Segments of urosome each one with a dorsal process small and triangular. Rostrum moderate, lateral cephalic lobe ordinary. Eyes not visible. Antennae flagellum broken. Antenna 1, peduncle articles 1 and 2 of equal length; article 1 with a long dorsodistal process, article 3 small, primary flagellum more than 13-articulate, accessory flagellum absent. Antenna 2 slender, articles 4 and 5 equal, flagellum more than 10- articulate. Labrum entire, rounded. + +Mandible with normal triturative molar, incisor sharply dentate, palp long, article 1 short, articles 2 and 3 equal in length, article 3 fringed with small spines on the distal half of the inner side, long sub-terminal spine. Maxilla 1 inner plate small with two small terminal spines, outer plate with seven broad spines. Maxilla 2 inner plate shorter than outer, eight terminal and sub-terminal setae, outer plate with nine terminal setae. Maxilliped inner plate short with two terminal triangular spines and two or three setae, outer plate with small facial spines, two terminal setae, palp with four articles, second longer than 1 and 3, article 4 longer than 3 and smooth. +Coxae 1–4 small, anteriorly produced as a sharp process. Gnathopod 1 smaller than gnathopod 2, subchelate, basis long, ischium and merus short, carpus as long as propodus, fringed with setae, propodus ovate, palmar fringed with small spines and defined by a larger spine, dactylus half of propodus. Gnathopod 2 large, basis long with two anterior crests ending distally with a small rounded process, ischium crested, merus produced, carpus triangular, propodus longer than broad, palm indented in a finger shape, proximal part with small spines and defined by three larger spines, dactylus long as two-thirds of the propodus. +Pereopods 3 and 4 similar, basis straight and long, ischium short, merus long as basis, fringed on both sides by small spines, carpus shorter than merus and propodus, propodus curved and humped in the proximal part, dactylus half length of propodus, claw-shaped. +Pereopods 5–7 similar, basis not lobate but little more broad than pereopods 3 and 4, other articles similar to pereopods 3 and 4. +Epimeral plates 1–3 similar, rounded. +Uropod 1, peduncle equal to sub-equal rami, each ramus fringed with scarce small spines. Uropod 2, outer ramus scarcely shorter than inner. Uropod 3 not expanded beyond uropods 1 and 2, rami lanceolate equal to peduncle, peduncle fringed with small spines. Telson entire, ovate, two pairs of sub-terminal spinules. + +Etymology. +The species is named in honour of Wim Vader for his important and friendly contribution to ‘‘amphipodology’’. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B646FF924E2977D798EBF2FA.xml b/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B646FF924E2977D798EBF2FA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..820055aca54 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B646FF924E2977D798EBF2FA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +New amphipods of hydrothermal vent environments on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Azores Triple junction zone + + + +Author + +Bellan-Santini, Denise + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2007 + +2007-06-30 + + +41 + + +9 - 12 + + +567 +596 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930701262537 + +journal article +10.1080/00222930701262537 +1464-5262 +4669830 + + + + + +Genus + +Podosirus + +n. gen. + + + + + +( +Figures 2 +, +3 +) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B648FF834DCB73A49BFDF0D0.xml b/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B648FF834DCB73A49BFDF0D0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f267436de5a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B648FF834DCB73A49BFDF0D0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,269 @@ + + + +New amphipods of hydrothermal vent environments on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Azores Triple junction zone + + + +Author + +Bellan-Santini, Denise + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2007 + +2007-06-30 + + +41 + + +9 - 12 + + +567 +596 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930701262537 + +journal article +10.1080/00222930701262537 +1464-5262 +4669830 + + + + + + +Oediceropsis bicornuta + +n. sp. + + + + + +( +Figures 9–12 +) + + + +Type +locality. + +Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Lucky Strike (Tour Eiffel), 37 +° +17.32 +9 +N, 32 +° +16.51 +9 +W, +1686 m +. + + + +Figure 9. + +Oediceropsis bicornuta +, Diva + +2. Holotype female. (1) habitus; (2) antenna 1; (3) antenna 2; (4) mandible; (5) labium; (6)maxilla 1; (7) maxilla 2; (8) maxilliped; (9) coxa 1; (10) gnathopod 1; (11) gnathopod 2. Scale bar 100 Mm. + + + + +Figure 10 + +Oediceropsis bicornuta +, Diva + +2. Holotype female. (1) pereopod 3; (2) pereopod 4; (3) pereopod 6; (4) pereopod 7. Scale bar 1000 Mm. + + + + +Figure 11. + +Oediceropsis bicornuta +, Diva + +2. Holotype female. (1) head; (2) pereopod 5, (3) epimeral plate 3; (4) uropod 1; (5) uropod 2; (6) telson. Scale bar 6 100 Mm; 2, 3, 4, 5: 1000 Mm. + + + +Material examined. + +DIVA 2 +cruise ( +particle trap +triple + +4 June 1994 + +– + +1 July 1994 + +, + +1.5 m + +of the bottom), foot of black smoker. Tour Eiffel, + +1686 m + +, +1 female +holotype +MNHN-Am 7469 + +. + + + +Figure 12. + +Oediceropsis bicornuta +, Diva + +2. Holotype female. (1) antenna 2 flagellum with calceoli et setose seta; (2) Antenna 2, calceolus. Scale bar 1: 100 Mm; 2: 10 Mm. + + + +Diagnosis. +Antenna 1 short, accessory flagellum absent. Antenna 2 shorter than half of body length, peduncle article 5 with a long antero-distal curved spine, each article of the flagellum with a plumose seta and a calceolus. Eyes absent. Telson normal. + + +Description. +Holotype +female with oostegites, +16 mm +. Head is equal to the two first segments of the mesosome. Body smooth. Eyes absent. Rostrum short, as long as lateral cephalic lobe. Lateral cephalic lobe quadrate. Antenna 1 reaching the end of article 4 of the peduncle of antenna 2; article 1 robust with single setae on the superior edge and plumose setae at the inferior edge; article 2 equal to 0.6 of article 1, setose; article 3 equal to half of article 2; accessory flagellum absent, flagellum 13-articulate. Antenna 2 shorter than half of body length, peduncle article 5 with a long curved antero-distal spine, as long as the eight first articles of the flagellum, and a posterior spine less long and straight; flagellum 67- articulate bearing at the inferior edge of each article a plumose seta and a calceolus. Mandible with incisor process denticulate, molar columnar, palp triarticulate, first article short and smooth; article 2 slightly curved and fringed with many short setae, one long subterminal seta; article 3 fringed with a single row of short setae, three long distal setae. Maxilla 1 inner plate rounded, fringed on the inner edge by five plumose setae, outer plate with seven bidentate spines, palp biarticulate, article 1 setose on the external edge, article 2 setose on the external edge and at the distal part of the inner edge. Maxilla 2 both plates equal and hardly setose. Maxilliped inner and outer plates setose on the inner edge, palp four-articulate, article 2 enlarged in the medial part, article 3 wide distally, article 4 falcate. + +Coxa 1 enlarged distally, distal edge fringed with numerous setae. Coxa 2, subrectangular, distal edge slightly shorter, rounded and fringed with numerous setae. Coxa 3 rectangular, distal edge setose, coxa 4 not excavate posteriorly, only concave, distal edge and half posterior edge setose. +Gnathopods subchelate. Gnathopod 1 basis fringed on both edges, ischium and merus short; carpus lobate, as long as wide, lobe not extending along the propodus; propodus enlarged length/breadth ratio 7:5, palm rounded, fringed with numerous short setae, delimited by a spine; dactylus curved, as long as palm. Gnathopod 2 basis fringed on the anterior edge; ischium and merus short; carpus lobate, lobe setose; propodus ovate, palm rounded, delimited by a spine, dactylus curved, long as palm. Pereopods 3 and 4 basis setose on both edges, merus distally enlarged, dactylus long. Pereopod 5 basis slightly lobate, strongly setose on both edges, merus ovate, fringed by long plumose setae on posterior edge and distal anterior one, dactylus long and blade shaped. Pereopod 6 basis proximally lobate, fringed on both edges by long setae; merus ovate, fringed with long setose seta on the posterior edge and simple setae on the anterior edge; dactylus seveneighths length of propodus and blade-shaped. Pereopod 7 elongate, basis slightly lobate, fringed on both edges by long setae, plumose setae on the lobe; ischium short, merus/ carpus/propodus/dactylus ratio 10:12:9.5:10, all articles fringed on both edges by robust setae. +Epimeral plate 3 rounded, fringed with short setae. Uropod 1 peduncle long and spinose, equal rami spinose, peduncle/rami ratio 13:8. Uropod 2 peduncle long and spinose, peduncle/rami ratio 9:8. Uropod 3 lost. Telson entire, as long as wide, distally excaved, fringed with small setae on the sides, two pairs of little distal setae. + +Remarks. +The calceoli of antenna 2 of this species have an original shape. +Lincoln and Hurley (1981) +have given good descriptions of the different +types +of calceoli. They describe nine structural +types +for different families. They consider that for eusirid, gammarellid and oedicerotid +types +, the calceoli are ‘‘immediately distinguished … from other calceoli’’ by ‘‘the distinct separation of the proximal and distal elements and the remarkable cup-shaped configuration of the former’’. In + +Oediceropsis bicornuta + +, a membrane with two acute tips envelops the fluted proximal parabolic element, the distal element is saucer shaped with a ridged plate interiorly. + + +Relationship. +In the +Oedicerotidae +, the genus + +Oediceropsis + +is characterized by the buccal structure; rostrum small or absent; gnathopods similar to one another, subchelate; articles 4 and 5 of antenna 2 with several very large or elongated and curved spines. Three species of + +Oediceropsis + +have been described; + +O. brevicornis +Lilljeborg, 1865 + +; + +O. elsula +Barnard, 1966 + +and + +O. proxima +Chevreux, 1908 + +. + +Oediceropsis bicornuta + +is distinguished from + +O. brevicornis + +by absence of eyes, size of antenna 1 reaching the end of article 4 of antenna 2, absence of hump in the coxa 4 and the telson distally excaved; from + +O. elsula + +by size of rostrum, shape of gnathopod 1 carpus and propodus, absence of posterior hump in the coxa 4, shape of telson. + +Oediceropsis proxima + +considered as very near to + +O. brevicornis + +has a short description, but coxa 4 is expanded posteriorly with a sharp upturned point; in + +Oediceropsis bicornuta + +the posterior edge of coxa 4 has only a small distal hump without point; the propodus of gnathopod +1 in + +O. proxima + +is longer than wide as gnathopod 2, in + +O. bicornuta + +the propodus of gnathopod 1 is as long as wide; the first two pereopods of + +O. proxima + +have the dactylus longer than propodus, in + +O. bicornuta + +dactylus/propodus have a ratio 2: +2.6 in +pereopod 3 and 2: +2.3 in +pereopod 4. The telson of + +Oediceropsis proxima + +has a crenulated distal margin not excavated as in + +O. bicornuta +; +O. proxima + +has no calceoli on antenna 2. + + +Distribution and habitat. +Mid-Atlantic Ridge, central Atlantic Ocean. + + +Etymology. +The name is suggested by the special shape of the membrane enveloping the proximal element of the calceoli. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B653FF874DF8732398FBF68E.xml b/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B653FF874DF8732398FBF68E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..34bec642455 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B653FF874DF8732398FBF68E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ + + + +New amphipods of hydrothermal vent environments on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Azores Triple junction zone + + + +Author + +Bellan-Santini, Denise + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2007 + +2007-06-30 + + +41 + + +9 - 12 + + +567 +596 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930701262537 + +journal article +10.1080/00222930701262537 +1464-5262 +4669830 + + + + + + +Stenopleustes rainbowi + +n. sp. + + + + + +( +Figures 16 +, +17 +) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B657FF834DDE72439E94F661.xml b/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B657FF834DDE72439E94F661.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..70b7164032e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2C/87/372C87A8B657FF834DDE72439E94F661.xml @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ + + + +New amphipods of hydrothermal vent environments on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Azores Triple junction zone + + + +Author + +Bellan-Santini, Denise + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2007 + +2007-06-30 + + +41 + + +9 - 12 + + +567 +596 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930701262537 + +journal article +10.1080/00222930701262537 +1464-5262 +4669830 + + + + + +Key of + +Oediceropsis + +species + + + + + + + +1. Eyes present................. + +O. brevicornis + + + + +– Eyes absent..................... 2 + + + + + +2. Coxa 4 posteriorly acutely produced........... + +O. proxima + + + + +– Coxa 4 posteriorly bluntly, not acutely produced.......... 3 + + + + + +3. Gnathopod 1, posterior lobe of carpus short and blunt, propodus ovate. + +O. elsula + + + + + +– Gnathopod 1, posterior lobe of carpus projecting and rounded, propodus as long as wide.................... + +O. bicornuta + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2C/CE/372CCE62EFED1C97966042EF7D44177B.xml b/data/37/2C/CE/372CCE62EFED1C97966042EF7D44177B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c32c715c14c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2C/CE/372CCE62EFED1C97966042EF7D44177B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Platygastroidea + + + +Author + +Buhl, Peter N. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Notton, David G. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +7991 +7991 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7991 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7991 +1314-2828-4-7991 + + + + + +Platygaster (Platygaster) picipes +Foerster +, 1861 + + + + +Distribution +England + + +Notes + +added by +Buhl and Notton (2009) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2D/4D/372D4D98EEBD31D3B72245C2B9D2A75F.xml b/data/37/2D/4D/372D4D98EEBD31D3B72245C2B9D2A75F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aa35100cda3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2D/4D/372D4D98EEBD31D3B72245C2B9D2A75F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Braconidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Mark R. + + + +Author + +Godfray, H. Charles J. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8151 +8151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 +1314-2828--8151 + + + + +Colastes (Colastes) vividus Papp, 1975 + + + +Distribution +England + + +Notes +NMS, det. Shaw, added here + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2D/74/372D74325CDA78A119607E8E38448C27.xml b/data/37/2D/74/372D74325CDA78A119607E8E38448C27.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d13be31e0c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2D/74/372D74325CDA78A119607E8E38448C27.xml @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part B) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +343 +369 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Borbonia laevigata +Linnaeus + +, + +Systema Naturae +, ed. 12, 2 + +: 473; + +Mantissa Plantarum + +: 100. 1767 + + +. + + + +"Habitat ad Cap. b. spei." RCN: 5182. + + + +Lectotype +(Schutte & Van Wyk in +Taxon +43: 579. 1994): +N.L. Burman 31 +, + +Herb. Linn. No. 890.4 ( +LINN +) + +, see p. 196. + + + + +Current name: + +Liparia laevigata +(L.) Thunb. + +( +Fabaceae +: +Faboideae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2D/C4/372DC4A27F0A5C57AA6419F29A59FAAB.xml b/data/37/2D/C4/372DC4A27F0A5C57AA6419F29A59FAAB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..874c1f2bd29 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2D/C4/372DC4A27F0A5C57AA6419F29A59FAAB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +Six new species of Aspidophorodon Verma, 1967 (Hemiptera, Aphididae, Aphidinae) from China + + + +Author + +Xu, Ying +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1 - 5 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China & Institute of Zoology, Academy of Sciences Republic of Uzbekistan, Bagishamol Str., 232 b, Tashkent 100053, Uzbekistan + + + +Author + +Jiang, Li-Yun +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1 - 5 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China +jiangliyun@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Chen, Jing +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1 - 5 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China + + + +Author + +Kholmatov, Bakhtiyor Rustamovich +College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 19, Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China + + + +Author + +Qiao, Ge-Xia +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1 - 5 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China & Institute of Zoology, Academy of Sciences Republic of Uzbekistan, Bagishamol Str., 232 b, Tashkent 100053, Uzbekistan +qiaogx@ioz.ac.cn + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2022 + +2022-06-16 + + +1106 + + +1 +55 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1106.77912 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1106.77912 +1313-2970-1106-1 +27BB738A103E4081BF6644F645E207A4 +12219E01D4A55BE3941B1909590F82A3 + + + + +Subgenus +Aspidophorodon Aspidophorodon Verma, 1967 + + + + +Aspidophorodon +Verma 1967 +: 507. Type species: +Aspidophorodon harvense +Verma 1967 +; by original designation. + + +Aspidophorodon (Aspidophorodon) +Verma: + +Remaudiere +and +Remaudiere +1997 + +: 73; +Stekolshchikov and Novgorodova 2010 +: 44; + +Nieto +Nafria +et al. 2011 + +: 145; +Chen et al. 2015 +: 557. + + + +Comments. +Spinal processes on body dorsum absent, and marginal processes present or absent on thoracic nota and abdominal tergites I-IV in apterae. Median frontal tubercle protuberant, hemispherical, rectangular, sometimes with a depression at the middle in apterae. Antennae 4- or 5-segmented in apterae. Cauda tongue-shaped with 4 or 5 setae, sometimes with 6 setae. + +The nominate subgenus contains seven species, including three new species. + +Aspidophorodon harvense + +Verma is first recorded in China. This subgenus is mainly distributed in eastern Asia. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2E/1E/372E1EBB26DB7DF6BB93430D23ED7810.xml b/data/37/2E/1E/372E1EBB26DB7DF6BB93430D23ED7810.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9a4806a6ca6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2E/1E/372E1EBB26DB7DF6BB93430D23ED7810.xml @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Atractodes (Asyncrita) foveolatus Gravenhorst, 1829 + + + + +canaliculatus +( +Hellen +, 1944, +Asyncrita +) + + + +Distribution +England + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2E/29/372E29D467A99E0C624141369A10B7AF.xml b/data/37/2E/29/372E29D467A99E0C624141369A10B7AF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7f8be87d8e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2E/29/372E29D467A99E0C624141369A10B7AF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@ + + + +A foundation monograph of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) in the New World + + + +Author + +Wood, John R. I. + + + +Author + +Munoz-Rodriguez, Pablo + + + +Author + +Williams, Bethany R. M. + + + +Author + +Scotland, Robert W. + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2020 + +143 + + +1 +823 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.143.32821 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.143.32821 +1314-2003-143-1 +F6F11A6EE4FF5A1885CEA2B60AE965A5 + + + + +181. + +Ipomoea concolor +(Matuda) D. Austin + +, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 64 +: 335. 1977 [pub. 1978]. (Austin 1978: 335) + + + + + +Exogonium concolorum +Matuda + + +, Anales Inst. Biol. Univ. Nac. +Mexico +36 + +: 116. 1965. (Matuda 1965: 116). Type. MEXICO. Guerrero, +Rincon +de la +Via +, +H. Kruse +844 (holotype MEXU00092233; isotypes IEB, MEXU). + + + +Ipomoea praecox +McPherson & Meacham + +, Contr. Univ. Michigan Herb. 14 +: 85. 1980. (McPherson 1980: 85), nom. illeg., non + +Ipomoea praecox +C. Wright (1870) + +. Type. MEXICO. Oaxaca, limestone hillside SW of Sola de Vega, +R. Moran +10095 (holotype UC1235383). + + + +Ipomoea mcphersonii +D.F. Austin + +, Taxon 45 +: 12. 1996. (Austin and +Huaman +1996: 12). Type. Based on + +Ipomoea praecox +McPherson & Meacham + + + + +Type. + +Based on + +Exogonium concolorum +Matuda + + + + +Description. + +Climbing perennial; stems woody to 2 m, pubescent. Leaves petiolate, 8-12 +x +7-9 cm, broadly ovate, apex abruptly and shortly acuminate, base truncate and shortly cuneate onto the petiole, adaxially glabrous to thinly pubescent, abaxially tomentose, paler; petioles 5-7 cm, pubescent. Inflorescence a dense, many-flowered pedunculate cyme; primary peduncles 1-2.5 cm, tomentose; bracteoles 3-5 mm, lanceolate, caducous; secondary peduncles 1-4 mm; pedicels 4-12 mm, sericeous; sepals subequal, 7-8.5 +x +3.5-4.5 mm, ovate-elliptic, obtuse, coriaceous, reddish, pubescent, the inner sepals more densely pubescent but with glabrous, scarious margins; corolla 3-4 cm long, tubular-hypocrateriform, dark pinkish-red, sericeous, limb lobed, the lobes 3-6 mm long, ovate, obtuse; stamens exserted. Capsules 22 mm long (fide Matuda), conical, glabrous; seeds 7-8 +x +5 mm, densely pilose on the margins with white hairs c. 8 mm long. + + + +Illustration. +McPherson (1980: 87). + + +Distribution. +Limestone rocks in scrub at c. 750 m. Endemic to southern Mexico. + +MEXICO. Guerrero +: Chilpancingo, +E. Matuda & E. Halvenger +s.n. (MEXU). +Oaxaca +: +Ghiesbrecht +s.n. (P); Pochutla, San Miguel del Puerto, +A. Nava Zafra et al. +618 (IEB, MEXU). + + + +Note. + +Somewhat similar to + +Ipomoea tehuantepecensis + +in habit, corolla shape and in the reddish sepals but immediately distinguished by the sericeous exterior of the corolla and sepals. Also resembles + +Ipomoea conzattii + +but differs in the much shorter corolla lobes and the sericeous corolla. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF25005D39FF0DFD12FB738031.xml b/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF25005D39FF0DFD12FB738031.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eba4508010e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF25005D39FF0DFD12FB738031.xml @@ -0,0 +1,325 @@ + + + +Revision of Diceroderes Solier (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Toxicini: Eudysantina), with Descriptions of Four New Species + + + +Author + +Smith, Aaron D. +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University PO Box 5640, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011 - 5640, U. S. A. +aaron.smith@nau.edu + + + +Author + +Cifuentes-Ruiz, Paulina +Instituto de Biología, Departamento de Zoología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70 - 153 Delegación Coyoacán, C. P. 04510, DF, MEXICO +paulinacifruz@yahoo.com.mx + +text + + +The Coleopterists Bulletin + + +2015 + +mo 14 + + +2015-12-18 + + +69 + + +55 +72 + + + +journal article +10.1649/0010-065X-69.mo4.55 +1938-4394 +4908445 + + + + + + + +Diceroderes cusucoensis +Smith + +, +new species + + + + + + +Figs. 26–27. + +Diceroderes cusucoensis + +, allotype + + + + +( +Figs. 5–6 +, +23 +, +24–27 +) + + + + +Type Material. + +HOLOTYPE +(male) labeled: (a) “ +HONDURAS +: +CORTES +, P.N. / +Cusuco +, +18.7km +. +N. Cofradia +, / +5.4km +. + +W. +Buenos Aires + +, +Cerro +/ +Jilinco +, + +1650m + +, + +26.VIII.1994 + +- / 225, +R. Anderson +, beating”; (b) on blue paper “Tenebrionid Base / +Aaron D. Smith +/ Catalog # 14688”; (f) on red paper, “ +HOLOTYPE +/ +Diceroderes +/ cusucoensis / Smith 2015” ( +CMNC +) + +. + +ALLOTYPE +(female) labeled: (a) “ +HONDURAS +: +Cortés +/ +Parq Nac Cusuco +/ + +5 km +W Buenos Aires + +/ + +26–27 August 1994 + +/ +RD Cave +collector”; (b) on blue paper “ +Tenebrionid Base +/ +Aaron D. Smith +/ +Catalog + +# + + + +Figs. 24–25. + +Diceroderes cusucoensis + +, holotype (male). + + + +24) +Dorsal habitus; +25) +Lateral habitus. + + +(female). +26) +Dorsal habitus; +27) +Lateral habitus. + + + +14949”; (c) on red paper, “ +ALLOTYPE +/ +Diceroderes +/ cusucoensis / Smith 2015” ( +ADSC +). +PARATYPES +( +4 specimens +, excluding +allotype +) (all bearing the label “ +PARATYPE +/ +Diceroderes +/ cusucoensis / +Smith +2015” on yellow paper and the database label “ +Tenebrionid Base +/ +Aaron D. Smith +/ +Catalog +# ”, for convenience tenebrioniDBase catalog numbers are listed as TB # without quotations): +One +paratype +( +RDCC +, +♂ +) labeled (a) same as +allotype +; (b) TB #s 14951. +One +paratype +( +BMNH +, +♂ +) labeled (a) same as +allotype +; (b) TB #s 14952. +One +paratype +( +ADSC +, +♂ +) labeled (a) same as +allotype +; (b) TB # 14950. +One +paratype +( +UVGC +, +♀ +) labeled (a) “ +GUATEMALA +. +Izabal +/ Los Amates, Sn Antonio / Sierra Espiritu Santo / + +10 agosto 1990 + +/ +J.Monzon E.Smith +”; (b) TB # 14953 + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Diceroderes cusucoensis + +can be separated from all other known members of the genus based on the following character combination: Supraorbital costae, transverse depressions, and medial tubercle on frons all absent; elytra in lateral view nearly straight from base to near apex then sharply declivous; prosternal process raised between coxae; males without apical spine on tibia; tubercles clothed in golden micro-pubescence, including apices. + + + + +Description. Male. +Length +8.6–9.5 mm +, width +4.3–4.9 mm +( +n += +4 specimens +). Color black, each fovea or puncture with 1 minute, decumbent, golden seta and all tubercles clothed in golden, tomentose pubescence unless otherwise noted. +Head: +Frons densely foveate throughout, without low supraorbital ridge or medial tubercle, posteriorly without transverse impression or nearly confluent foveae; vertex nearly on same plane as frons and densely foveate; frontoclypeal suture deeply and broadly impressed; clypeus moderately setose and with golden pubescence, anterior margin nearly straight, with shallow submarginal impression; gena between eye and clypeus raised and with golden pubescence; impression absent around eye from gena to apex. Eye elongate oval, approximately facets across; large U-shaped lobe present behind eye, lobe moderately punctate and pubescent. Labrum without transverse medial ridge, semi-erect golden setae present on anterior half, margin rounded with setae along edges of vertical surface; mandible bifid at apex, dorsal and lateral surfaces smooth; mentum trapezoidal, rugofoveate with short decumbent setae otherwise, widest at anterior margin, medial longitudinal ridge absent; submentum small, as wide as basal margin of mentum, triangular. Antennomeres 9 and 10 subequal in size, antennomere 11 slightly smaller than preceding segments; antennomere 3 approximately 1.2X length of antennomere 4, antennomeres 4–8 subequal in length. +Prothorax: +Pronotal disc almost flat, widest near middle then constricted in basal third; moderately foveate, without medial impunctate region, tuberculate, each tubercle clothed in golden pubescence and decumbent minute setae curved towards apex of tubercle, apex pubescent and rounded; discal tubercles dense and random, some forming 2 very small submedial patches of nearly confluent tubercles connecting to 2 longitudinal tuberculate ridges running from outer base of horns to near basal margin; anterior half of pronotum bearing 2 sublateral anteriorly directed horns, horns divergent near base then curved towards midline, dorsal and outer surfaces densely tuberculate, ventral surfaces densely foveate, inner surfaces rugose and foveate, apices recurved; pronotum laterally from horn to margin densely tuberculate near base of horn, moderately foveate otherwise, lateral costa present near anterior margin, lateral margin with row of regularly spaced tubercles medially, anterior apices slightly produced and acute, posterior apices acute, not projecting; anterior margin straight, with transverse costa absent, longitudinal costae on underside of horns weakly indicated; posterior margin slightly bisinuate with medial emargination receiving scutellum. Hypomeron moderately foveate, fovea lacking or with a minute setae. Prosternum anterior to coxa approximately as long as coxal cavity, densely foveate; prosternal process raised between coxa, weakly impressed, apex acute. +Pterothorax: +Dorsal outline elongate oval, widest behind middle. Elytron dorsally nearly flat to slightly concave, medially depressed posterior to scutellum, sharply sloping and tapering caudad; stria indicated by irregular rows of fovea, interstria with tubercles and somewhat regularly spaced minute decumbent scale-like setae; each elytral disc with 1 short tuberculate submarginal costa from humeral angle to nearly half of elytral length and 1 closer to elytral suture in caudal third, additional short tuberculate costa or protrusions somewhat randomly occurring in interstrial regions; lateral portion of elytron between costae and poorly defined pseudepipleural margin densely tuberculate; pseudepipleura regularly moderately foveate, lacking tubercles; ventral margin of epiplura with deep groove for reception of abdominal ventrites 3–5. Scutellum with minute decumbent scale-like setae, subtriangular, posterior portion V-shaped, dorsal margin rounded and extending past elytral base, +∼ +1.6X as wide as long. Mesosternum short, anteriorly weakly emarginate behind prosternal process, mesocoxal cavities open. Metasternum short, separating meso- and metacoxal cavities by less than mesocoxal cavity length. All visible ventrites on the pterothorax moderately foveate. +Legs: +Femora lacking spines or other protrusions, densely micropubescent with minute decumbent setae; tibia densely clothed in micro-pubescence and minute golden decumbent setae, inner surface with longer straight spine-like setae, outer margin without low pubescent tubercles, apical margin with 2 distinct socketed spurs, apical spine between spurs absent; distal tarsomere length subequal to length of combined preceding segments on meso- and meta-legs, with sparse golden setae, venter of all other tarsomeres clothed with dense long golden setae. +Abdomen: +Visible ventrites densely finely punctate medially, each puncture with one minute decumbent seta, relatively clean of pruinescence, lateral margins moderately setose, often obscured by pruinescence; abdominal intercoxal process broad, with submarginal impression, anterior margin rounded; intersegmental membranes concealed, connection between ventrites 3–5 deeply medially depressed; ventrite 5 lacking submarginal groove; abdominal defensive reservoirs present; sternite 8 weakly sclerotized and setose, deeply medially emarginate, emargination V-shaped; aedeagus with parameres fused, much longer than basal piece, dorsally flattened, nearly parallel sided to apical fifth of length, apical fifth sharply acuminate, partially dehisced at tip and weakly curved ventrad ( +Figs. 5–6 +). + + +Female. +Similar to male, except with shorter, stouter pronotal horns, horns curved towards midline but not recurved at apex ( +Figs. 26–27 +). + + + + +Distribution. +Honduras +: +Cortés +; +Guatemala +: +Izabal +( +Fig. 23 +). + + + + +Etymology. +The species epithet refers to the Cusuco National Park in +Honduras +where the +holotype +and most of the type series were collected. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF25045D36FD4FFC5CFF178488.xml b/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF25045D36FD4FFC5CFF178488.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e6cc2dc2110 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF25045D36FD4FFC5CFF178488.xml @@ -0,0 +1,645 @@ + + + +Revision of Diceroderes Solier (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Toxicini: Eudysantina), with Descriptions of Four New Species + + + +Author + +Smith, Aaron D. +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University PO Box 5640, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011 - 5640, U. S. A. +aaron.smith@nau.edu + + + +Author + +Cifuentes-Ruiz, Paulina +Instituto de Biología, Departamento de Zoología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70 - 153 Delegación Coyoacán, C. P. 04510, DF, MEXICO +paulinacifruz@yahoo.com.mx + +text + + +The Coleopterists Bulletin + + +2015 + +mo 14 + + +2015-12-18 + + +69 + + +55 +72 + + + +journal article +10.1649/0010-065X-69.mo4.55 +1938-4394 +4908445 + + + + + + + +Diceroderes mexicanus +Solier, 1841 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 3–4 +, +13–23 +) + + + + + + + +Diceroderes mexicanus +Solier 1841: 49 + + +. + + + + + +Type Material. + +LECTOTYPE +( +Figs. 13–14 +), designated here, (male) labeled ( +Fig. 15 +): on green circle (a) “ +Diceroderes +/ mexicanus / [illegible Mexique Sol.] / [illegible]”; (b) on green paper “ +Mexique +”; (c) on green paper “ +Diceroderes Solier +/ Taurus du Breme [?] / +Colombia +/ [?] Gre ( +Genre in French +) Protomenes Dej.”; (d) on red paper, “ +LECTOTYPE +/ + +Diceroderes + +/ + +mexicanus + +/ Solier / des. ADSmith 2015” ( +MNHN +) + +. + +PARALECTOTYPE +( +Figs. 16–17 +), designated here, (female) labeled ( +Fig. 18 +): on green circle (a) “ +Diceroderes +/ mexicanus / +Colombia +/ [illegible] Sol. (by +Solier +) 67”; (b) on green paper “ +Diceroderes Solier +/ +Prosomenes Dejean +/ +mexicanus Solier +/ [see label] / +Mexico +”; (c) on yellow paper, “PARALECTO- TYPE / + +Diceroderes + +/ + +mexicanus + +/ +Solier +/ des. ADSmith 2015” ( +MNHN +) + +. + + +Additional Material Examined. +Thirty-two specimens. +MEXICO +: +Puebla +, Apulco, 1 ex ( +♂ +), + + +21-I-2001 + +, +L. Cervantes +coll. ( +CNIN +). +MEXICO +: +Veracruz +, +Ixhuacán +, + +Puente +de Dios + +, 1 ex ( +♂ +) + +, + + +15-V-2012 + +, +E. Arriaga +coll. ( +CNIN +). +MEXICO +: +Puebla +, +Necaxa +, + +1200 m + +.a.s.l., +2 ex. +( +♂ +♀ +) + +, + + +27-VII- 1947 + +, +C. Bolívar +& +I. Piña +coll. ( +CNIN +). +MEXICO +: +Veracruz +, + +5 km +N de Tlaquipa + +, 1 ex ( +♂ +) + +, + + +22-III-2003 + +, M. G.- +París +& +G. Parra +coll. ( +CNIN +). +MEXICO +: +Puebla +, RMO +Xocoyolo +, 1 ex ( +♂ +) + +, + + +4-X-2001 + +, M. G.- +París +& +G. Parra +coll. ( +CNIN +) + +. + +MEXICO +: +Veracruz +, + +19 km +NW Ciudad Mendoza + +, VII-11-74 J. +Powell +, J. +Chemsak +, + +Pinus + +, 1 ex ( +♂ +, +EMEC +) + +. + +MEXICO +: +Hidalgo +, Hwy. 105 +2.7 mi. +N. Tlachinol +, 5000 + +′ + + +10-VI-1983 + +; G.B. +Marshall +C.W. & L.O’ +Brien +, berlese cloud forest litter, 1 ex ( +♀ +, +FSCA +). +MEXICO +: +Veracruz +, +19km +NW +C.Mendoza + + + +VIII-13-1987 + +, + +1900m + +J.T. +Doyen +, 1 ex ( +♂ +, +EMEC +). +MEXICO +: +Veracruz +, + +17 km +SSE Misantla + + + + +31 Jul 1990 + + +1200 m + +el. J.K. +Liebherr +CAS-CU-UCB +Field Exp. +, 1 ex ( +♀ +, +CUIC +). +MEXICO +: +Veracruz +, +Jalapa + + + +24-XII-1979 + +P.W. Kovarik +, coll., 1 ex ( +♀ +, +TAMU +). +MEXICO +: +Veracruz +, +Microondas +10 air km NNW +Huatusco + + + +14 Aug 1987 + +el. + +2000 m + +MEXICO +: +Field Party +1987: J.K. +Liebherr +D.A. +Millman +, 3 ex ( +♂ +♀♀ +, +CUIC +) + +. + +MEXICO +: +Veracruz +, 10 air km NNW Coscomatepec + +2000m + + + + +VIII-14- 1987 + +J.T. +Doyen +, 2 ex ( +♂ +- +EMEC +, +♀ +- +RLAC +) + +. Las Vigas, Vera Cruz. Höge, 1 ex ( +♀ +, + + + +Figs. 13–15. + +Diceroderes mexicanus + +, lectotype (male). +13) +Dorsal habitus; +14) +Lateral habitus; +15) +Labels. + + + + +Figs. 16–18. + +Diceroderes mexicanus + +, paralectotype (female). +16) +Dorsal habitus; +17) +Lateral habitus; +18) +Labels. + + + + +Figs. 19–20. + +Diceroderes mexicanus + +, morph two specimen (male), TB# 14740. +19) +Dorsal habitus; +20) +Lateral habitus. + + + + +BMNH +). Orizaba +Mexico +Salle Coll, 1 ex ( +♂ +, +BMNH +). +MEXICO +: +Veracruz +, Xalapa, +Instituto de Ecologia area +La Briones +29-XI-94 + +Quercus + +/coffee savanna +Col. Purrington +& +C.Drake +, 1 ex ( +♀ +, +OSUC +). +All +other specimens labeled “ +Mexico +” or some variant thereof, or without locality information + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Diceroderes mexicanus + +can be separated from all other known members of the genus based on the following character combination: Frons with low supraorbital costae; elytra in lateral view nearly straight from base to near apex then sharply declivous; prosternal process raised between coxae, with apical projection; elytra not or weakly depressed near scutellum; tubercles not clothed in micro-pubescence, tubercle apices glabrous and lustrous; males without apical spine on tibia. + + + + +Redescription. Male. +Length +7.2–8.7 mm +, width +3.8–4.4 mm +( +n += +13 specimens +). Color ferruginous to black. +Head: +Frons densely foveate, denser anteriorly, with low supraorbital ridge or tubercle, posteriorly with weak transverse impression or nearly confluent foveae; vertex raised above frons and densely foveate; frontoclypeal suture deeply and broadly impressed; clypeus densely foveate, tubercles absent or rarely with small tubercles, anterior margin slightly rounded, with slightly raised lip; gena between eye and clypeus raised and densely foveate; faint impression present around eye from gena to apex. Eye elongate oval to slightly reniform, approximately 6 facets across; large U-shaped lobe present behind eye, lobe densely foveate. Labrum without transverse medial ridge, semi-erect golden setae present on anterior half, margin rounded with setae along edges of vertical surface; mandible bifid at apex, dorsal and lateral surfaces smooth; mentum trapezoidal, rugofoveate with mix of long and short straight golden setae, widest at anterior margin, faint medial longitudinal ridge present or absent; submentum small, as wide or wider than basal margin of mentum, triangular to pentagonal. Antennomeres 9 and 10 subequal in size, antennomere 11 smaller than preceding segments and weakly asymmetrical; antennomere 3 approximately 1.4X length of antennomere 4, antennomeres 4–8 subequal in length. +Prothorax: +Pronotal disc almost flat, widest near middle; moderately to densely foveate, with medial longitudinal region impunctate and tuberculate, each tubercle clothed in decumbent setae curved towards apex of tubercle, apex smooth, rounded, and glabrous, occasionally with visible micropit; discal tubercles randomly distributed except 2 submedial patches of nearly confluent tubercles and 2 longitudinal ridges running from outer base of horns to near basal margin bearing nearly confluent tubercles; anterior half of pronotum bearing 2 sublateral anteriorly directed horns, horns divergent near base then curved towards midline, dorsal and outer surfaces densely tuberculate, ventral and inner surfaces densely foveate, apices slightly recurved; pronotum densely tuberculate laterally from horn to margin, lateral costa absent, lateral margin with row of regularly spaced tubercles, anterior apices slightly produced and acute, posterior apices acute, not projecting; anterior margin straight, with transverse costa running entire length, merging with longitudinal costae on underside of horns; posterior margin slightly bisinuate with medial emargination receiving scutellum. Hypomeron moderately foveate, each fovea with 1 decumbent setae arising from edge. Prosternum anterior to coxa approximately as long as coxal cavity, densely foveate, each fovea with relatively long, decumbent golden seta; prosternal process raised between coxa, medially impressed, apex subacute, with small, recurved process, and projecting behind coxa. +Pterothorax: +Dorsal outline oval, widest near or slightly behind middle. Elytron dorsally nearly flat to slightly concave, sharply sloping and tapering caudad; stria weakly indicated by irregular rows of fovea, interstria with tubercles and somewhat regularly spaced minute decumbent scale-like setae; each elytral disc with either 2 low, longitudinal, densely tuberculate costae or costae near suture coalesced into 2 separate strongly elevated tuberculate costae, 1 anterior, 1 posterior, and costa furthest from midline irregularly broken and confused; lateral portion of elytron between costae and poorly defined pseudepipleural margin densely tuberculate; pseudepipleura regularly, moderately foveate, lacking tubercles; ventral margin of epiplura with deep groove for reception of abdominal ventrites 3–5. Scutellum with minute decumbent scale-like setae, subtriangular, posterior portion V-shaped, dorsal margin rounded and extending past elytral base, +∼ +1.4X as wide as long. Mesosternum short, anteriorly weakly emarginate behind prosternal process, mesocoxal cavities open. Metasternum short, separating meso- and metacoxal cavities by less than mesocoxal cavity length. All visible ventrites on the pterothorax densely foveate, each fovea with golden seta. +Legs: +Femora lacking spines or other protrusions, densely shallowly punctate, punctures fine and almost completely obscured by pruinescence, each with 1 decumbent seta; tibia without callosities, clothed in decumbent setae set in fine punctures, inner surface with longer spine-like setae, inner apical margin with 2 distinct socketed spurs, apical spine between spurs absent; distal tarsomere length equal to or greater than length of combined preceding segments, with sparse golden setae, venter of all other tarsomeres clothed with dense long golden setae. +Abdomen: +Visible ventrites densely finely punctate medially, each puncture with 1 decumbent seta, relatively clean of pruinescence, lateral margins moderately setose, fine punctures often obscured by pruinescence; abdominal intercoxal process broad, with submarginal impression, anterior margin rounded; intersegmental membranes concealed, connection between ventrites 3–5 deeply medially depressed; ventrite 5 lacking submarginal groove; abdominal defensive reservoirs present; sternite 8 weakly sclerotized and setose, deeply medially emarginate, emargination V-shaped; aedeagus with parameres fused, slightly longer than basal piece, dorsally flattened and nearly parallel sided until apical fifth of length, apical fifth sharply acuminate, partially dehisced at tip and weakly curved ventrad ( +Figs. 3–4 +). + + + +Figs. 21–22. + +Diceroderes mexicanus + +, morph two specimen (female), TB# 14795. +21) +Dorsal habitus; +22) +Lateral habitus. + + + + +Fig. 23. + +Diceroderes +species + +, distribution map. Triangles = + +D. mexicanus + +, white triangles are for morph one, gray/blue triangles for morph two. Stars = + +D. cusucoensis +. + +Squares = + +D. ocozocoautlaensis +. + +Diamonds = + +D. skelleyi +. + +Circles = +D. subtriplehorni +. + + + +Female. +Similar to male, except with shorter, stouter pronotal horns, horns curved towards midline but not recurved at apex ( +Figs. 16–17 +, +21–22 +). + + +Variation. +Specimens can be roughly sorted into two morphs based on elytral sculpturing. The +lectotype +and +paralectotype +represent morph one ( +Figs. 13–17 +). A male ( +Figs. 19–20 +) and female ( +Figs. 21–22 +) of morph two are shown for comparison. However, the two morphs overlap in distribution and a number of specimens are difficult to place. Male genitalia and all other characters examined, other than elytral sculpturing, support maintaining them as unnamed variants of + +D. mexicanus + +. One potential cause for the observed variation may be seasonality. Specimens with relatively regular elytral costae, such as the type specimens, were collected from June to mid-August. Specimens with elytral costae broken into distinct separate regions, morph two, were collected from mid-August to December. + + + + +Distribution. +Mexico +: +Hidalgo +, +Puebla +, +Veracruz +( +Fig. 23 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF250B5D21FD59FD77FD7585F4.xml b/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF250B5D21FD59FD77FD7585F4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4cf7849e227 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF250B5D21FD59FD77FD7585F4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,760 @@ + + + +Revision of Diceroderes Solier (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Toxicini: Eudysantina), with Descriptions of Four New Species + + + +Author + +Smith, Aaron D. +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University PO Box 5640, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011 - 5640, U. S. A. +aaron.smith@nau.edu + + + +Author + +Cifuentes-Ruiz, Paulina +Instituto de Biología, Departamento de Zoología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70 - 153 Delegación Coyoacán, C. P. 04510, DF, MEXICO +paulinacifruz@yahoo.com.mx + +text + + +The Coleopterists Bulletin + + +2015 + +mo 14 + + +2015-12-18 + + +69 + + +55 +72 + + + +journal article +10.1649/0010-065X-69.mo4.55 +1938-4394 +4908445 + + + + + + + +Diceroderes subtriplehorni +Smith and Cifuentes-Ruiz + +, +new species + + + + + + +( +Figs. 11–12 +, +23 +, +36–39 +) + + + + +Type Material. + +HOLOTYPE +, (male) labeled: (a) “ +MEX +: +Veracruz +/ S Sontecomapan / Est. Biol. Los / +Tuxtlas + +27 Jul / 1990 + +el. + +150 m + +”; (b) “ +J.K. Liebherr +/ CAS-CU-UCB / Field Exped.”; (c) on blue paper “Tenebrionid Base / +Aaron D. Smith +/ Catalog # 13109”; (d) on red paper, “ +HOLOTYPE +/ + +Diceroderes + +/ + +subtriplehorni + +/ Smith & Cifuentes- Ruiz 2015” ( +CUIC +) + +. + +ALLOTYPE +(female) labeled: (a) “ +MEX +: +Veracruz +Est. Biol. / “ +Los Tuxtlas +” + + + + +Figs. 36–37. + +Diceroderes subtriplehorni + +, holotype + + + +(male). +36) +Dorsal habitus; +37) +Lateral habitus. + + + +Figs. 38–39. + +Diceroderes subtriplehorni + +, allotype + + + +(female). +38) +Dorsal habitus; +39) +Lateral habitus. + + +27 Jul 1990 +/ +150 m +el. J.K. Liebherr / CAS-CU- UCB Field Exp.”; (b) “on downed logs at night”; (c) on blue paper “Tenebrionid Base / Aaron D. Smith / Catalog # 14756”; (d) on red paper, “ALLO- TYPE / + +Diceroderes + +/ + +subtriplehorni + +/ Smith & Cifuentes-Ruiz 2015” ( +CUIC +). +PARATYPES +( +28 specimens +, excluding the +allotype +) (all bearing the label “ +PARATYPE +/ + +Diceroderes + +/ + +subtriplehorni + +/ Smith & Cifuentes-Ruiz 2015” on yellow paper and most with the database label “Tenebrionid Base / Aaron D. Smith / Catalog # ”, for convenience tenebrioniDBase catalog numbers are listed as TB # without quotations): One +paratype +( +CUIC +, +♀ +), labeled (a) “MEX: +Veracruz +Est. Biol. / “Los Tuxtlas” +25 Jul 1990 +/ +150–200 m +J.K. Liebherr / CAS-CU-UCB Field Exp.”; (b) TB # 14746. One +paratype +( +CUIC +, +♂ +) labeled (a) “ +MEX +: +Oaxaca +Valle / Nacional, +12 km +S / +21 July 1990 +el. / +700 m +J.K. Liebherr / CAS-CU-UCB Exped. ”; (b) “under / bark of / log”; (c) TB # 13102. Two +paratypes +( +USNM +, +♀♀ +) labeled (a) “ +MEXICO +: V.C.; / Coyame, Catemaco / +June 1954 +”; (b) TB #s 14743, 14748. One +paratype +( +TAMU +, +♀ +) labeled (a) “ +MEXICO +: +Veracruz +/ +11.3 mi. +N. Misantla / 26 Sept., 1976 / W. E. Clark”; (b) TB # 14747. One +paratype +( +EMEC +, +♀ +) labeled (a) “MEX: +Veracruz +/ Est. Biol. Los / Tuxtlas VII-26-90 / J. Doyen”; (b) “UC Berkeley / EMEC / 253210”; (c) TB # 14744. One +paratype +( +EMEC +, +♀ +) labeled (a) “ +MEX +: +Veracruz +/ Est. Biol. / Los Tuxtlas / VII-1/9-1988 / J.A.Chemsak”; (b) “UC Berkeley / EMEC / 253211”; (c) TB # 14750. Two +paratypes +( +OSUC +, +♂ +♀ +) labeled (a) “ +9 mi. +SW.Catemaco / Mexico (Ver.) / VII-15-59 1800′”; (b) “B.+B. Valentine / collectors”; (c) “OSUC [1- “524297”, 1- “524296”]”; (d) TB # 14749, 14781. One +paratype +( +OSUC +, +♂ +) labeled (a) “ +Mexico +. V.C. Volcan / San Martin. SE.slope / B.&B. Valentine”; (b) “beating el. / 49–5000′ / 30-VII-59”; (c) “OSUC 524299”; (d) TB # 14751. One +paratype +( +OSUC +, +♀ +) labeled (a) “Mex.Ver.VolcanSan / Martin.SE, slope / vii- 21-59”; (b) “Collrs.B.&B. / Valentine”; (c) “OSUC 524298”; (d) TB # 14745. Eight +paratypes +( +ADSC +, +2♂ +, +6♀ +) labeled (a) “ +MEXICO +: +Veracruz +/ Ruiz Cortínez, Sierra / de los Tuxtlas, beating / +18.527 +, + +− +95.137 + +, 1072m / +08.Aug.2015 +, ADSmith”; (b) “Fiesta de los Escarabajos / NAUF-CNIN-OSAC- ASUT, / ADSmith, GRodríguez-Mirón, / RAGomez, and MAJohnston. (c) TB #s 14962–14969. One +paratype +( +MAJC +, +♀ +) labeled (a) “ +MEXICO +: +Veracruz +/ Ruiz Cortínez, Sierra / de los Tuxtlas, beating / +18.527 +, + +− +95.137 + +, 1072m / +08.Aug.2015 +, MAJohnston”; (b) “Fiesta de los Escarabajos / NAUF- CNIN-OSAC-ASUT, / ADSmith, GRodríguez- Mirón, / RAGomez, and MAJohnston. (c) TB # 14954. +PARATYPES +from CNIN and IEXA, given without verbatim labels: Mexico, +Oaxaca +, km 60 Tuxtepec-Oaxaca highway, +15-X-1979 +, E. Barrera coll. ( +CNIN +, +1♂ +, +3♀♀ +). +MEXICO +, +Oaxaca +, km 11 Valle Nacional highway, +16-X-1979 +, H. Brailovsky coll. ( +CNIN +, +♂ +♀ +). +MEXICO +, +Veracruz +, Mpio. San Andrés Tuxtla, Balzapote, +20-II-1985 +, P. Reyes coll. ( +IEXA +, +♂ +). +MEXICO +, +Oaxaca +, km 70 Tuxtepec- +Oaxaca +highway, +1500 m +, +1-IV-1986 +, A. Ibarra coll. ( +CNIN +, +♂ +). + + + + +Figs. 40–41. + +Diceroderes skelleyi + +, holotype (male), abdominal ventrites 1–3. +40) +Inner surface showing glandular pads; +41) +Outer surface showing pores through integument, lighter dots represent external openings. GP = glandular pad, V = ventrite. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Diceroderes subtriplehorni + +can be separated from all other known members of the genus based on the following character combination: Frons with low supraorbital costae and deep transverse impression; clypeus with transverse row of tubercles; elytra in lateral view rounded from front to back; males with apical spine on all tibia; mentum lacking medial longitudinal ridge. This species is similar to + +D. ocozocoautlaensis + +and is separated in that species’ diagnosis. + + + + +Description. Male. +Length +7.5–7.8 mm +, width +3.9–4.2 mm +( +n += +4 specimens +). Color ferruginous to black, each fovea or puncture with 1 decumbent golden seta unless otherwise noted. +Head: +Frons densely deeply foveate throughout, with low supraorbital ridge, posteriorly with deep transverse impression; vertex raised above frons and densely foveate; frontoclypeal suture deeply and broadly impressed; clypeus with densely tuberculate transverse band and setose, anterior margin nearly straight with sharp raised lip; gena between eye and clypeus raised and densely foveate; shallow impression present around eye from gena to apex. Eye elongate oval to slightly reniform, approximately 5 facets across; large U-shaped densely foveate lobe present behind eye. Labrum without transverse medial ridge, semi-erect golden setae present on anterior half, margin rounded with setae along edges of vertical surface; mandible bifid at apex, dorsal and lateral surfaces smooth; mentum trapezoidal, rugofoveate with long straight setae near anterolateral margins and short decumbent setae otherwise, widest at anterior margin, medial longitudinal ridge present; submentum small and poorly defined, as wide or wider than basal margin of mentum, triangular. Antennomeres 9 and 10 subequal in size, antennomere 11 smaller than preceding segments and weakly asymmetrical; antennomere 3 approximately 1.4X length of antennomere 4, antennomeres 4–8 subequal in length. +Prothorax: +Pronotal disc almost flat, widest near middle, constricted in basal third; densely foveate, with small impunctate medial longitudinal region, tuberculate, each tubercle clothed in microtomentose setae and decumbent setae curved towards apex of tubercle, apex smooth, rounded, and glabrous, occasionally with visible micropit; discal tubercles sparsely randomly distributed excepting 2 submedial patches of nearly confluent tubercles and 2 longitudinal ridges running from outer base of horns to near basal margin bearing nearly confluent tubercles; anterior half of pronotum bearing 2 sublateral anteriorly directed horns, horns divergent near base then curved towards midline, dorsal and outer surfaces densely tuberculate and foveate, ventral and inner surfaces densely foveate, apices slightly recurved; pronotum laterally from horn to margin tuberculate and foveate, lateral costa absent, lateral margin with row of regularly spaced tubercles, anterior apices slightly produced and acute, posterior apices acute, not projecting; anterior margin straight, with poorly defined transverse costa running entire length, merging with longitudinal costae on underside of horns; posterior margin slightly bisinuate with medial emargination receiving scutellum. Hypomeron densely foveate. Prosternum anterior to coxa approximately as long as coxal cavity, densely foveate, each fovea with a relatively long decumbent golden seta; prosternal process raised between coxa, medially impressed, apex subacute and projecting behind coxa. +Pterothorax: +Dorsal outline oval, widest near or slightly behind middle. Elytron dorsally convex, gradually sloping at both ends; stria weakly indicated by irregular rows of fovea, interstria with tubercles and somewhat regularly spaced minute decumbent scale-like setae; each elytral disc with 1 low longitudinal, densely tuberculate costa near middle, second costa often present closer to humeral angle; lateral portion of elytron between costae and poorly defined pseudepipleural margin densely tuberculate; pseudepipleura regularly densely foveate, lacking tubercles; ventral margin of epiplura with deep groove for reception of abdominal ventrites 3–5. Scutellum with minute decumbent scale-like setae, subtriangular, posterior portion V-shaped, dorsal margin rounded and extending past elytral base, +∼ +1.8X as wide as long. Mesosternum short, anteriorly weakly emarginate behind prosternal process, mesocoxal cavities open. Metasternum short, separating meso- and metacoxal cavities by less than mesocoxal cavity length. All visible ventrites on the pterothorax densely foveate, each fovea with golden seta. +Legs: +Femora lacking spines or other protrusions, densely shallowly punctate, punctures fine and almost completely obscured by pruinescence, each with 1 decumbent seta; tibia without callosities, clothed in decumbent setae set in fine punctures, inner surface rarely with few spine-like setae, inner apical margin with 2 minute socketed spurs, apical spine between spurs present on all tibia in males; distal tarsomere shorter than combined length of preceding segments, with sparse golden setae, venter of all other tarsomeres clothed with dense long golden setae. +Abdomen: +Visible ventrites densely finely punctate medially, becoming shallowly foveate on ventrite 5 caudally, each puncture with 1 decumbent seta, relatively clean of pruinescence, lateral margins moderately setose, fine punctures absent or obscured by pruinescence; abdominal intercoxal process broad, with submarginal impression, anterior margin rounded; intersegmental membranes concealed, connection between ventrites 3–5 deeply medially depressed; ventrite 5 lacking submarginal groove; abdominal defensive reservoirs present; sternite 8 weakly sclerotized and setose, deeply medially emarginate, emargination V-shaped; aedeagus with parameres fused, subequal in length to basal piece, dorsally convex, widest near base then gradually acuminate to thin partly dehisced apical fourth of length, weakly curved ventrad towards apex ( +Figs. 11–12 +). + + +Female. +Similar to male, except lacking apical tibial spines and with shorter, stouter pronotal horns, horns curved towards midline but not recurved at apex ( +Figs. 38–39 +). + + + + +Distribution. +Mexico +: +Oaxaca +, +Puebla +, and +Veracruz +( +Fig. 23 +). + + + + +Etymology. +The species epithet is in honor of Dr. Charles “Chuck” A. Triplehorn for his gracious mentorship of many younger tenebrionid workers, including the authors, and references the lack of a third pronotal horn in the species. + + + + + +KEY TO THE KNOWN +SPECIES +OF + + + + +DICERODERES +SOLIER + + + + + + +1. Elytron in lateral view rounded from base to apex ( +Fig. 27 +); head with short ridge above eye, transverse excavation on frons, and tubercles on clypeus; parameres widest in basal half, gradually narrowing to apex ( +Figs. 7, 11 +); apical tibial spine present on at least metatibia in male ........................................................................... 2 + + + + +1′. Elytron in lateral view dorsally flattened, sharply declivous before apex ( +Fig. 14 +); head lacking the above combination of characters, parameres nearly parallel-sided in basal ¾, sharply narrowing near apex ( +Figs. 3, 5, 9 +); apical tibial spine absent in male................3 + + + + + + +2. Elytron strongly depressed near scutellum; apical tibial spine present on all legs in male ( +Fig. 35 +); +Mexico +: +Veracruz +, +Oaxaca +............ ..................... + + +D. subtriplehorni + +, +new species + + + + + +2′. Elytron weakly depressed near scutellum; apical tibial spine present only on hind tibia in male ( +Fig. 27 +); +Mexico +: +Chiapas +.............. ............... + + +D. ocozocoautlaensis + +, +new species + + + + + + + + +3. Prosternal process declivous behind procoxae ( +Fig. 31 +); frons with medial tubercle; +Guatemala +: +Baja Verapaz +, +El Progreso +............................... .................................. + + +D +. +skelleyi + +, +new species + + + + + + +3′. Prosternal process raised behind procoxae ( +Fig. 25 +); frons lacking medial tubercle......4 + + + + + + +4. Frons lacking tubercles or depressions; pronotum strongly constricted near base; elytral disc flattened and lacking tubercles in basal half ( +Fig. 24 +); +Honduras +: +Cortés +, +Guatemala +: +Izabal +............................ + + +D. cusucoensis + +, +new species + + + + + +4′. Frons with tubercles above eyes and often with transverse depression; pronotum weakly constricted near base; elytral disc convex and tuberculate in basal half ( +Fig. 19 +); +Mexico +: +Hidalgo +, +Puebla +, and +Veracruz +..................... .................................... + + +D. mexicanus +Solier + + + + + + + + +CLAVE PARA LAS ESPECIES +CONOCIDAS +DE + + + + + + +DICERODERES +SOLIER + + + + + + + + +1. Élitros en vista lateral redondeados de la base al ápice ( +Fig. 27 +); cabeza con una carina corta arriba del ojo, depresión transversa en la frente y tubérculos en el clípeo; parámeros con ancho máximo en la mitad basal, gradualmente estrechándose hacia el ápice ( +Figs. 7, 11 +); espina apical tibial presente en al menos metatibia en el macho .................................................... 2 + + + + +1′. Élitros en vista lateral dorsalmente aplanados, en declive abrupto antes del ápice ( +Fig. 14 +); la cabeza careciendo de la combinación anterior de caracteres, parámeros con los lados casi paralelos en los ¾ basales, estrechándose abruptamente cerca del ápice ( +Figs. 3, 5, 9 +); espina apical de la tibia ausente en el macho.......................... 3 + + + + + + +2. Élitros fuertemente deprimidos cerca del escutelo, espina apical de la tibia presente en todas las patas del macho ( +Fig. 35 +); + +México +: +Veracruz +, +Oaxaca +......................................... ................ + + +D. subtriplehorni + +, nueva especie + + + + + + +2′. Élitros débilmente deprimidos cerca del escutelo; espina apical de la tibia presente solo en la tibia posterior del macho ( +Fig. 27 +); +México +: +Chiapas +............................................... ............. + + +D. ocozocoautlaensis + +, nueva especie + + + + + + + + +3. Proceso prosternal en declive detrás de las procoxas ( +Fig. 31 +); frente con tubérculo medio; +Guatemala +: +Baja Verapaz +, +El Progreso +............ ................................ + + +D +. +skelleyi + +, nueva especie + + + + + + +3′. Proceso prosternal elevado detrás de las procoxas ( +Fig. 25 +); frente sin tubérculo medio ........................................................................ 4 + + + + + + +4. Frente sin tubérculos o depresiones; pronoto fuertemente estrechado cerca de la base; disco elitral aplanado y sin tubérculos en la mitad basal ( +Fig. 24 +); +Honduras +: +Cortés +, +Guatemala +: +Izabal +........................................ .................. + + +D. cusucoensis + +, nueva especie + + + + + + +4′. Frente con tubérculos arriba de los ojos y frecuentemente con una depresión transversa; pronoto débilmente estrechado cerca de la base; disco elitral convexo y tuberculado en la mitad basal ( +Fig. 19 +); ( +México +: +Hidalgo +, +Puebla +, and +Veracruz +).................. + + +D. mexicanus +Solier + + + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF250D5D3DFD4FFCA2FCFB8493.xml b/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF250D5D3DFD4FFCA2FCFB8493.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..715b6d85d49 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF250D5D3DFD4FFCA2FCFB8493.xml @@ -0,0 +1,410 @@ + + + +Revision of Diceroderes Solier (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Toxicini: Eudysantina), with Descriptions of Four New Species + + + +Author + +Smith, Aaron D. +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University PO Box 5640, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011 - 5640, U. S. A. +aaron.smith@nau.edu + + + +Author + +Cifuentes-Ruiz, Paulina +Instituto de Biología, Departamento de Zoología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70 - 153 Delegación Coyoacán, C. P. 04510, DF, MEXICO +paulinacifruz@yahoo.com.mx + +text + + +The Coleopterists Bulletin + + +2015 + +mo 14 + + +2015-12-18 + + +69 + + +55 +72 + + + +journal article +10.1649/0010-065X-69.mo4.55 +1938-4394 +4908445 + + + + + + + +Diceroderes skelleyi +Smith + +, +new species + + + + + + +( +Figs. 9–10 +, +23 +, +32–35 +, +40–41 +) + + + + +Type Material. + +HOLOTYPE +(male) labeled: (a) “ +GUATEMALA +: +El Progreso +; / +Sierra +de las +Minas +; nr. +Pinalon +, / nr. +Finca la Tormenta +, / nr. +15.07222 +, +-89.94891 +; / + +15-17-V-2010 + +; +∼ + +2199m + +; / +P.Skelley +, moist oak forest”; (b) on blue paper “Tenebrionid Base / +Aaron D. Smith +/ Catalog # + + + + +Figs. 32–33. + +Diceroderes skelleyi + +, holotype (male). + + + +32) +Dorsal habitus; +33) +Lateral habitus. + + + +Figs. 34–35. + +Diceroderes skelleyi + +, allotype (female). + + + +34) +Dorsal habitus; +35) +Lateral habitus. + + + +13105”; (c) on red paper, “ +HOLOTYPE +/ + +Diceroderes + +/ + +skelleyi + +/ +Smith +2015” ( +FSCA +). +ALLOTYPE +(female) labeled: (a) “ +GUATEMALA +: +El Progreso +; / +Sierra +de las +Minas +; nr. +Pinalon +, / nr. +Finca la Tormenta +, +∼ + +2199m + +; / nr. +15.07222 +, +-89.94891 +; / + +15-17-V-2010 + +; +P.Skelley +/ moist pine/oak forest”; (b) on blue paper “ +Tenebrionid Base +/ +Aaron D. Smith +/ +Catalog +# 13107”; (c) on red paper, “ALLO- TYPE / + +Diceroderes + +/ + +skelleyi + +/ +Smith +2015” ( +FSCA +). +PARATYPES +( +6 specimens +, excluding the +allotype +) (all bearing the label “ +PARATYPE +/ + +Diceroderes + +/ + +skelleyi + +/ Smith 2015” on yellow paper and the database label “Tenebrionid Base / +Aaron D. Smith +/ Catalog # ”, for convenience tenebrioniDBase catalog numbers are listed as TB # without quotations): Two +paratypes +( +BMNH +, +♀♀ +), on the same pin, labeled (a) “ +S. Geronimo +, / Guatemala / Champion.”; (b) “ +B.C.A. Col. +IV.1. / +Diceroderes +/ mexicanus.” (c) handwritten “ +Diceroderes +/ mexicanus / Solier”; (d) TB # 13108. One +paratype +( +FSCA +, +♀ +) labeled (a) “ +GUATEMALA +: +El Progreso +; / Sierra de las Minas; nr.Pinalon, / nr. +Finca la Tormenta +, / nr. +15.07222 +, +-89.94891 +; / + +15-17-V-2010 + +; +∼ + +2199m + +; / +P.Skelley +, moist oak forest”; (b) TB # 13106. One +paratype +( +CMNC +, +♀ +) labeled (a) “GUAT.: +BAJA VERAPAZ +/ +4.5km +. +S. Purulha +, + +1630m + +. / + +21.V.1991 + +, +R. Anderson +/ cloud forest litter, 91-6”; (b) TB # 14783. One +paratype +( +CMNC +, +♂ +) labeled (a) “GUAT.: +EL PROGRESO +/ +20km +. +N. Estancia +de la / Virgen, + +1800–1900m + +. +8.VI. / 1991 +, +R. Anderson +, cloud / forest, 91-55”; (b) TB # 14784. One +paratype +( +CMNC +, +♂ +) labeled (a) “GUAT.: +BAJA VERAPAZ +/ +8km +. +S. Purulha +, + +1660m + +. / + +31.V.1991 + +, +R. Anderson +/ pine/cloud forest, 91-38”; (b) TB # 14782 + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Diceroderes skelleyi + +can be separated from all other known members of the genus based on the following character combination: Frons with supraorbital costae and medial tubercle; elytra in lateral view nearly straight from base to near apex then sharply declivous; prosternal process declivous behind coxae; males without apical spine on tibia; tubercles clothed in golden micropubescence, including apices. This species is most similar to + +D +. +cusucoensis + +but can be separated based on the declivous prosternal process and the presence of tubercles on the frons in + +D. skelleyi + +. + + + + +Description. Male. +Length +8.2–8.6 mm +, width +3.8–4.1mm +( +n += +3 specimens +). Color ferruginous to black, each fovea or puncture with 1 minute decumbent golden seta and all tubercles clothed in golden tomentose pubescence unless otherwise noted. +Head: +Frons densely foveate throughout, with low supraorbital ridge and medial tubercle, posteriorly without transverse impression or nearly confluent foveae; vertex raised above frons and densely foveate; frontoclypeal suture deeply and broadly impressed; clypeus moderately setose and with golden pubescence, anterior margin slightly rounded, with raised lip; gena between eye and clypeus raised and with golden pubescence; faint impression present around eye from gena to apex. Eye elongate oval to slightly reniform, approximately 7 facets across; large U-shaped lobe present behind eye, lobe moderately foveate and pubescent. Labrum without transverse medial ridge, semi-erect golden setae present on anterior half, margin rounded with setae along edges of vertical surface; mandible bifid at apex, dorsal and lateral surfaces smooth; mentum trapezoidal, rugofoveate with few long straight setae near anterolateral margins and short decumbent setae otherwise, widest at anterior margin, medial longitudinal ridge absent; submentum small, as wide as basal margin of mentum, triangular. Antennomeres 9 and 10 subequal in size, antennomere 11 smaller than preceding segments; antennomere 3 approximately 1.3X length of antennomere 4, antennomeres 4–8 subequal in length. +Prothorax: +Pronotal disc almost flat, widest near middle then sharply constricted in basal third; moderately foveate, without medial impunctate region, tuberculate, each tubercle clothed in golden pubescence and decumbent minute setae curved towards apex of tubercle, apex pubescent and rounded; discal tubercles forming 2 small submedial patches of nearly confluent tubercles connecting to 2 longitudinal tuberculate ridges running from outer base of horns to near basal margin; anterior half of pronotum bearing 2 sublateral anteriorly directed horns, horns slightly divergent near base then weakly curved towards midline, dorsal and outer surfaces densely tuberculate, ventral surfaces densely foveate, inner surfaces foveate and tuberculate, apices recurved; pronotum laterally from horn to margin densely tuberculate near base of horn, moderately foveate otherwise, lateral costa present near anterior margin, lateral margin with row of regularly spaced tubercles medially, anterior apices slightly produced and acute, posterior apices acute, not projecting; anterior margin straight, with transverse costa nearly absent, vaguely connecting to weak longitudinal costae on underside of horns; posterior margin slightly bisinuate with medial emargination receiving scutellum. Hypomeron moderately foveate, fovea lacking or with a minute setae. Prosternum anterior to coxa approximately as long as coxal cavity, densely foveate; prosternal process declivous between coxa, medially impressed, apex slightly rounded. +Pterothorax: +Dorsal outline elongate oval, widest behind middle. Elytron dorsally nearly flat to slightly concave, sharply sloping and tapering caudad; stria indicated by rows of deep fovea, interstria with tubercles and somewhat regularly spaced minute decumbent scale-like setae; each elytral disc with 1 short tuberculate longitudinal costa near humeral angle and 1 costa closer to elytral suture in caudal third, additional short tuberculate costa or protrusions somewhat randomly occurring in interstrial regions; lateral portion of elytron between costae and poorly defined pseudepipleural margin densely tuberculate; pseudepiplura regularly moderately foveate, lacking tubercles; ventral margin of epiplura with deep groove for reception of abdominal ventrites 3–4. Scutellum with minute decumbent scale-like setae, subtriangular, posterior portion U- to V-shaped, dorsal margin rounded and extending past elytral base, +∼ +1.6X as wide as long. Mesosternum short, anteriorly weakly emarginate behind prosternal process, mesocoxal cavities open. Metasternum short, separating meso- and metacoxal cavities by less than mesocoxal cavity length. All visible ventrites on the pterothorax moderately foveate. +Legs: +Femora lacking spines or other protrusions, densely micro-pubescent with minute decumbent seate; tibia densely clothed in micro-pubescence and minute golden decumbent setae, clothed in decumbent setae set in fine punctures, inner surface with longer straight spine-like setae, outer margin with low pubescent tubercles, apical margin with 2 distinct socketed spurs, apical spine between spurs absent; distal tarsomere length subequal to length of combined preceding segments, with sparse golden setae, venter of all other tarsomeres clothed with dense long golden setae. +Abdomen: +Visible ventrites densely finely punctate medially, each puncture with 1 minute decumbent seta, relatively clean of pruinescence, lateral margins moderately setose, often obscured by pruinescence; abdominal intercoxal process broad, with submarginal impression, anterior margin rounded; intersegmental membranes concealed, connection between ventrites 3–5 deeply medially depressed; ventrite 5 lacking submarginal groove; abdominal defensive reservoirs present; sternite 8 weakly sclerotized and setose, deeply medially emarginate, emargination V-shaped; aedeagus with parameres fused, slightly longer than basal piece, dorsally flattened, widest at base and gradually narrowing to apical fifth of length, apical fifth sharply acuminate, partially dehisced at tip and weakly curved ventrad ( +Figs. 9–10 +). + + +Female. +Similar to male, except pronotal horns slightly thicker and shorter ( +Figs. 34–35 +). + + + + +Distribution. +Guatemala +: +Baja Verapaz +, +El Progreso +( +Fig. 23 +). + + + + +Etymology. +The species epithet is in honor of Dr. Paul E. Skelley, an enthusiastic coleopterist, indomitable field researcher, and collector of the +holotype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF250F5D3BFD62F999FBE28546.xml b/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF250F5D3BFD62F999FBE28546.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..db7f23c70ce --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2E/87/372E87BF250F5D3BFD62F999FBE28546.xml @@ -0,0 +1,292 @@ + + + +Revision of Diceroderes Solier (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Toxicini: Eudysantina), with Descriptions of Four New Species + + + +Author + +Smith, Aaron D. +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University PO Box 5640, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011 - 5640, U. S. A. +aaron.smith@nau.edu + + + +Author + +Cifuentes-Ruiz, Paulina +Instituto de Biología, Departamento de Zoología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70 - 153 Delegación Coyoacán, C. P. 04510, DF, MEXICO +paulinacifruz@yahoo.com.mx + +text + + +The Coleopterists Bulletin + + +2015 + +mo 14 + + +2015-12-18 + + +69 + + +55 +72 + + + +journal article +10.1649/0010-065X-69.mo4.55 +1938-4394 +4908445 + + + + + + + +Diceroderes ocozocoautlaensis +Smith + +, +new species + + + + + + +( +Figs. 7–8 +, +23 +, +28–31 +) + + + + +Type Material. +HOLOTYPE +(male) labeled: + + +(a) “MEXICO. Chiapas, / Laguna Belgica, / + + + +Figs. 28–29. + +Diceroderes ocozocoautlaensis + +, holotype (male). +28) +Dorsal habitus; +29) +Lateral habitus. + + + + +16kmNW Ocozocoautla / + + +970m + +. + + +7.VI.1990 + +/ +H. & A. Howden +”; (b) on blue paper “Tenebrionid Base / +Aaron D. Smith +/ Catalog # 14689”; (c) on red paper, “ +HOLOTYPE +/ + +Diceroderes + +/ + +ocozocoautlaensis + +/ Smith 2015” ( +CMNC +). +ALLOTYPE +(female) labeled: (a) same collecting event as +holotype +; (b) on blue paper “Tenebrionid Base / +Aaron D. Smith +/ Catalog # 14690”; (c) on red paper, “ALLO- TYPE / + +Diceroderes + +/ + +ocozocoautlaensis + +/ Smith 2015” ( +CMNC +). +PARATYPE +(female, +1 specimen +) labeled: (a) “ +MEXICO +: +Chiapas +/ +Mpio +: +Villa + + + + +Corso +, +Ejido Sierra +/ + +Morena R. +Biosfera La Sepultura + +/ + +1600m + +, +16°09′10.6″N +, +93°35′25.1″W +/ + +19–20.VII.2005 + +, +R. Anderson +, / oak-pine ridge forest litter, / 2005-004F”; (b) on blue paper “Tenebrionid Base / +Aaron D. Smith +/ Catalog # 14691”; (c) on yellow paper, “ +PARATYPE +/ + +Diceroderes + +/ + +ocozocoautlaensis + +/ Smith2015” ( +CMNC +) + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Diceroderes ocozocoautlaensis + +can be separated from all other known members of the genus based on the following character combination: Frons with low supraorbital costae and deep transverse impression; clypeus with transverse row of tubercles; elytra in lateral view rounded from front to back; males with apical spine on hind tibia only; mentum with medial longitudinal ridge. This species is similar to + +Diceroderes subtriplehorni + +, +new species +, as the only other species with rounded elytra in lateral view. It also has similar male genitalia, but can be separated based on the lack of apical tibial spines on the pro- and mesolegs in male + +D. ocozocoautlaensis + +and by the lack of a welldefined transverse anterior ridge on the pronotum, the presence of a medial longitudinal ridge on the mentum, and having the elytra more depressed around the scutellum in + +D. subtriplehorni +. + + + + + + +Description. Male, +Holotype +. + +Length +9.1 mm +, width +4.5 mm +. Color ferruginous to black, each fovea or puncture with 1 decumbent golden seta unless otherwise noted. +Head: +Frons densely deeply foveate throughout, with low supraorbital ridge, posteriorly with deep transverse impression; vertex raised above frons and densely foveate; frontoclypeal suture deeply and broadly impressed; clypeus with densely tuberculate transverse band and setose, anterior margin nearly straight with sharp raised lip; gena between eye and clypeus raised and densely foveate; shallow impression present around eye from gena to apex. Eye slightly reniform, approximately 5 facets across; large U-shaped moderately shallowly foveate lobe present behind eye. Labrum without transverse medial ridge, semi-erect golden setae present on anterior half, margin rounded with setae along edges of vertical surface; mandible bifid at apex, dorsal and lateral surfaces shagreened and sparsely setose; mentum trapezoidal, with long straight setae near anterolateral margins and short decumbent setae otherwise, widest at anterior margin, posteromedial raised area present, disappearing before anterior margin; submentum small and well-defined, as wide as basal margin of mentum, pentagonal. Antennomeres 9–11 subequal in size; antennomere 3 approximately 1.3X length of antennomere 4, antennomeres 4–8 subequal in length. +Prothorax: +Pronotal disc almost flat, widest near middle, constricted in basal third; densely foveate, with impunctate medial longitudinal region, tuberculate, each tubercle clothed in microtomentose setae and decumbent setae curved towards apex of tubercle, apex smooth, rounded, and glabrous, occasionally with visible micropit; discal tubercles nearly absent except 2 submedial patches of nearly confluent tubercles and 2 longitudinal ridges running from outer base of horns to near basal margin bearing nearly confluent tubercles; anterior half of pronotum bearing 2 sublateral anteriorly directed horns, horns divergent near base then curved towards midline, dorsal and outer surfaces densely tuberculate and foveate, ventral and inner surfaces densely foveate, apices slightly recurved; pronotum laterally from horn to margin tuberculate and foveate, lateral costa absent, lateral margin with row of regularly spaced tubercles, anterior apices slightly produced and acute, posterior apices acute, not projecting; anterior margin straight, with well-defined transverse costa running entire length, merging with longitudinal costae on underside of horns; posterior margin slightly bisinuate with medial emargination receiving scutellum. Hypomeron densely foveate. Prosternum anterior to coxa approximately as long as coxal cavity, densely foveate, each fovea with a relatively long decumbent golden seta; prosternal process raised between coxa, medially impressed, apex subacute, recurved, and projecting behind coxa. +Pterothorax: +Dorsal outline oval, widest behind middle. Elytron dorsally convex, gradually sloping at both ends; stria indicated by irregular rows of fovea, interstria with tubercles and somewhat regularly spaced minute decumbent scalelike setae; each elytral disc with weak longitudinal, densely tuberculate, costa near middle; lateral portion of elytron between costae and poorly defined pseudepipleural margin densely tuberculate; pseudepipleura regularly densely foveate, sparsely tuberculate; ventral margin of epiplura with deep groove for reception of abdominal ventrites 3–5. Scutellum with minute decumbent scale-like setae, subtriangular, posterior portion V-shaped, dorsal margin rounded and extending past elytral base, +∼ +1.1X as wide as long. Mesosternum short, anteriorly weakly emarginate behind prosternal process, mesocoxal cavities open. Metasternum short, separating meso- and metacoxal cavities by less than mesocoxal cavity length. All visible ventrites on the pterothorax densely foveate, each fovea with golden seta. +Legs: +Femora lacking spines or other protrusions, densely shallowly punctate, punctures fine and almost completely obscured by pruinescence, each with 1 decumbent seta; tibia without callosities, clothed in decumbent setae set in fine punctures, inner surface with few spine-like setae, inner apical margin with 2 small socketed spurs, apical spine between spurs present on hind tibia in males; distal tarsomere shorter than combined length of preceding segments, with sparse golden setae, venter of all other tarsomeres clothed with dense long golden setae. +Abdomen: +Visible ventrites densely finely punctate medially, becoming shallowly foveate on ventrite 5 caudally, each puncture with 1 decumbent seta, relatively clean of pruinescence, lateral margins moderately setose, fine punctures absent or obscured by pruinescence; abdominal intercoxal process broad, anterior margin rounded; intersegmental membranes concealed, connection between ventrites 3–5 deeply medially depressed; ventrite 5 lacking submarginal groove; abdominal defensive reservoirs present; sternite 8 weakly sclerotized and setose, deeply medially emarginate, emargination V-shaped; aedeagus with parameres fused, subequal in length to basal piece, dorsally convex, widest near base then gradually acuminate to thin partly dehisced apical fourth of length, very weakly curved ventrad towards apex ( +Figs. 7–8 +). + + + +Figs. 30–31. + +Diceroderes ocozocoautlaensis + +, allotype (female). +30) +Dorsal habitus; +31) +Lateral habitus. + + + +Female. +Similar to male, except lacking apical tibial spines and with shorter, stouter pronotal horns, horns curved towards midline but not recurved at apex ( +Figs. 30–31 +). + + + + +Distribution. +Mexico +: +Chiapas +( +Fig. 23 +). + + + + +Etymology. +The species epithet refers to the Ocozocoautla region in +Chiapas +where the +holotype +and +allotype +were collected. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2E/C7/372EC7B0754637FC89D1AE93A9EBD2EA.xml b/data/37/2E/C7/372EC7B0754637FC89D1AE93A9EBD2EA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2e175e8756c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2E/C7/372EC7B0754637FC89D1AE93A9EBD2EA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Solanaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/solanaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Datura innoxia +Mill. + + + + + + +Grossbluetiger +Stechapfel + + + + + +Art ISFS: 133750 Checklist: 1014920 +Solanaceae +Datura +Datura innoxia Mill. + + +Zusammenfassung +KEINE ANGABE + + + +Oekologie + + + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + +KEINE ANGABE + + +
+
+ + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl L--Salzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl T--
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +--
+ + + + +Nomenklatur + + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Datura innoxia +Mill. + + + + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: + +Grossbluetiger +Stechapfel + +Nom +francais +: + +Stramoine +a +grandes fleurs + + + + +Nome italiano: -- + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Datura innoxia Mill. + + +Checklist 2017 + +133750
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Kommentare aus der +Checklist 2017 +Neues Taxon: +Gegenueber +SISF-2 neu aufgenommener Neophyt. Aus Kultur verwildert. Checklist + + + + +Status Indigenat +: Kultivierter Neophyt: nach dem Jahr +1500 in +der Schweiz aufgetreten + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2E/F6/372EF634CC3EFFEDFC76ECFB495FF804.xml b/data/37/2E/F6/372EF634CC3EFFEDFC76ECFB495FF804.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3abd491a15f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2E/F6/372EF634CC3EFFEDFC76ECFB495FF804.xml @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ + + + +Nomenclature And Identity Of The Tongue Soles Paraplagusia Bilineata, “ Cynoglossus Bilineatus ” And Paraplagusia Blochii (Teleostei: Pleuronectiformes) + + + +Author + +Kottelat, Maurice + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2013 + +2013-08-30 + + +61 + + +2 + + +763 +766 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.5352910 +2345-7600 +5352910 + + + + + +“ + +CYNOGLOSSUS BILINEATUS + +” + + + + + +The fish referred to as “ + +Cynoglossus bilineatus + +” by authors is said to have been described by La Cepède (1802: 659, 663) as + +Achirus bilineatus + +. There is no indication that La Cepède had examined material. His account included references to: (1) “ + +Pleuronectes bilineatus +. + +Linné, édition de Gmelin”; (2) “Bloch, pl. 188”; (3) “Pleuronecte, sole à deux lignes. Bonnaterre, planches de l’Encyclopédie méthodique”. + + +Source (1) is +Gmelin (1789: 1235) +. It explicitly refers to +Bloch (1787: 29 +, pl. 188). It includes no information not already appearing in Bloch’s text and therefore seems based exclusively on Bloch’s data. Moreover, it is not known that Gmelin had examined any material. Source (2) is plate 188 of +Bloch (1787) +; there is no mention of the text. Source (3) is +Bonnaterre (1788: 79 +, pl. 91 fig. 377). The figure is a black and white copy of Bloch’s figure. The description is that given by Bloch. There is also explicit reference to the French edition of +Bloch (1788: 21) +, but no mention of inner anatomy. + + +In conclusion, La Cepède’s account of + +Achirus bilineatus + +is based only on Bloch’s + +Pleur. +bilineatus + +. + +Achirus bilineatus + +was not, therefore, a new species but a new combination of + +Pleur. +bilineatus + +. As a result, the name + +bilineatus + +is not available for a species of + +Cynoglossus + +. +Menon (1977: 36) +listed the synonyms of his “ + +Cynoglossus bilineatus + +”. Among these, the earliest available name for this species is + +Plagusia quadrilineata +Bleeker, 1851 + +, thus the valid name of the species is + +Cynoglossus quadrilineatus +(Bleeker, 1851) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/2F/D8/372FD8CB56045AC094CF4AE886C038D9.xml b/data/37/2F/D8/372FD8CB56045AC094CF4AE886C038D9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5229304cb9a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/2F/D8/372FD8CB56045AC094CF4AE886C038D9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,758 @@ + + + +Three new species of the sea fan genus Muricea (Cnidaria, Octocorallia, Plexauridae) from the northwest region of Mexico + + + +Author + +Hernandez, Osvaldo +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6195-149X +Departamento de Plancton y Ecologia Marina, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Av. IPN, s / n, CP 23096, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico & Departamento de Ciencias Marinas y Costeras, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur, Carretera al sur km 5.5, CP 23080, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico + + + +Author + +Gomez-Gutierrez, Jaime +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2516-897X +Departamento de Plancton y Ecologia Marina, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Av. IPN, s / n, CP 23096, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico + + + +Author + +Galvan-Tirado, Carolina +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3973-256X +Departamento de Ciencias Marinas y Costeras, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur, Carretera al sur km 5.5, CP 23080, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico & Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Av. Insurgentes Sur 1582, Col. Credito Constructor, Alcaldia Benito Juarez, C. P. 03940, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico + + + +Author + +Sanchez, Carlos +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7199-1268 +Departamento de Ciencias Marinas y Costeras, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur, Carretera al sur km 5.5, CP 23080, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico +csanchez@uabcs.mx + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2023 + +2023-07-18 + + +1169 + + +333 +352 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1169.89651 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1169.89651 +1313-2970-1169-333 +B3CBCC79BEE841B9A8AB69426EC0FBDA +339DE2775B2E5D73ABF700229725DF0E + + + + +Muricea ambarae +sp. nov. + + + +Material examined. + + + + +Holotype + +. + +USNM 1606629: dry, +San Esteban Island +(Punta Sureste), +Sonora +, +Mexico +( +28°40.29228'N +, +112°33.24035'W +), + +20 m +depth + +, 20 °C, +20 June 2010 +(Fig. +1B +) + +. + + + +Paratypes + +. + +USNM 1606630: dry, +San Esteban Island +( +Punta Noroeste +), +Sonora +, +Mexico +( +28°43.22958'N +, +112°36.76110'W +), + +20 m +depth + +, 21 °C, +17 July 2010 + +; + +USNM 1606631: dry, + +Bahia +de Las +Animas + +( +Los Choros +), +Baja California +, +Mexico +( +28°50.36868'N +, +113°14.80885'W +), + +18 m +depth + +, 20 °C, +18 July 2010 + +; + +USNM 1606632: dry, +Punta Abreojos +, +Pacific +coast of +Baja California Sur +, +Mexico +( +26°41.76060'N +, +113°34.59960'W +), + +21 m +depth + +, 16.5 °C, +24 June 1998 +( +Fig. +1B +) + +. + +The +type specimens were collected by + +Carlos +Sanchez +. + + + + + +Holotype colony description. + +Colony with flabellate growth in one plane and laterally branched, 21 cm high and 14.2 cm wide (Fig. +2A +, Table +1 +). The holdfast is an irregular oval, 1.9 cm in length and 1.3 cm wide from which grows the main stem, 5.2 cm in height and 0.5 mm in diameter. There is no coenenchyme on the base of the steam lost during the collect; the base coenenchyme shows a dark gray and brownish bicolored axis. The growth of the branches is lateral and upward. Some terminal branches are short, about 5 mm in length and 3.5 mm in diameter, while the longest ones are 9.5 cm in length and 3.5 mm in diameter (Fig. +2B +, Table +1 +). All the terminal tips are blunt and covered by calyces. Calyces in the colony range up to 1 mm in height and are 1 mm in diameter and are shelf-like in form with an imbricated arrangement. The coenenchyme color is pale yellow, but the coloration of the calyces is reddish-brown, giving the colony an overall pale and dark orange appearance (Fig. +2A, B +, Table +1 +). + + + +Table 1. +Internal and external characters of + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov., + +Muricea cacao + +sp. nov. and + +Muricea molinai + +sp. nov. with similar + +Muricea + +nominal species distributed along the Mexican Pacific and Gulf of California collected from 1998-2020 and compared with +Breedy and Guzman (2015 +, +2016a +). +Colony growth +: bu = bushy, fa = falling branches, fl = flabellate. +Branching type +: di= dichotomous, irr = irregularly, lb = laterally branched, ob = open branched. +Polyp distribution rows +: im = imbricated, c = close, s = sparsely. +Calyx form +: el= elongated, sl = shelf-like, t = tubular. +Color +: am = amber, br = brownish-red, bi = bicolor, cl = colorless, db = deep brown, dy = dull yellowg = gray, lb = light brown, lo = light orange, o = orange, ro = reddish-orange, py = pale yellow, r = red, rb = reddish-brown, y = yellow, w = white. +Sclerites +: ae = acute end spindles, bs = branched spindles, be = bend spindles, cs = curved spindles, cl= club-like, de = dull ends spindles, lb = lobed, ls = leaf spindles, ps = prickly spindles, r = rods, slr = star-like radiates, str = straight spindles, tbr = tuberculated rods, tbs = tuberculated spindles, uss = unilateral spinous spindles, ws = warty spindles, wr = warty rods. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
SpeciesColony growthBranching typeTerminal branches length (cm)Polyp distribution rowsPseudoanastomosisCalyx height elevation (mm)Calyx formColony ColorOuter coenenchymal and calyx dominant spindlesCoenenchymal and calycular spindles maximum size (mm)Inner coenenchymal spindlesAnthocodial scleritesSclerites color
+ +M. californica + +buirr, lb2.8c, imno1.9elrols0.5slr, wslb, wram, lo, ro, py
+ +M. echinata + +buirr, lb6-3cno2.8-3slrbuss2.4wsr, bso, lb
+ +M. fruticosa + +buirr1.5-4cno1-1.2slrb, w, biuss2wsws, wr, bsw, rb, py
+ +M. galapagensis + +faob8sno0.6-1sllouss4.1wsr, psam, lo
+ +M. plantaginea + +flirr, lb1-5c, imno0.7-1.2sldb/wls1wslb, wrrb, am
+ +M. squarrosa + +fldi4cno2.6tlbcl, cs1.3tbsclbr, cl, py, y
+ +M. ambarae + +sp. nov. +fllb9.5imno1slols, tbs1.2wslbcl, o, y, py
+ +M. cacao + +sp. nov. +fllb9imyes1slbr-rls1.7ae/de-wstbr-aedb, rb
+ +M. molinai + +sp. nov. +fllb8.7imno3tguss, tbs2.5str, cstbr, lrg, am, cl
+ + + +Figure 2. + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. +A +holotype USNM 1606629 +B +holotype detail of branches +C +axial and coenenchymal sclerites. + + + + +Holotype sclerites. + +The sclerites of the outer coenenchyme and calycular are pale yellow or pale orange leaf spindles (0.3-1.2 mm length), tuberculated spindles with blunt ends (0.2-1.1 mm length), and tuberculated spindles with acute ends (0.2-1.1 mm length) (Figs +2C +, +3A-D +, Table +1 +). The leaf spindles are more common all around the polyp aperture, and the spindles with acute ends are the dominant type of sclerite in the rest of the coenenchyme (Fig. +3A +). The axial sheath comprises thin spindles with acute ends and clubs (0.3-0.9 mm in length) (Fig. +3B, C +). These spindles forms have different sizes of tubercles; about 70% of the coenenchyme and calyx sclerites are colorless (Fig. +2C +), with the rest of the sclerites pale yellow or pale orange. Anthocodial sclerites are colorless warty rods, 0.2-0.3 mm in length with acute or dull ends (Fig. +3D +). + + + +Figure 3. + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. SEM +A, B +calycular and coenenchymal sclerites +C +axial sclerites +D +anthocodial sclerites. + + + + +Morphological variation. + +All 14 colonies of + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. examined are morphologically like the holotype in colony growth and sclerite form with colony size range observed +in situ +between 4 and 32 cm height (Suppl. material 1: fig. S1A-D). + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. colonies show differences in color intensity ranging from darker to lighter orange (Suppl. material 1: fig. S1A-D). Only three of these 15 analyzed colonies showed a lax and bushy colony growth form. Qualitative +in situ +observations showed a dominance of the planar form over the bushy form (Fig. +8A, B +). The polyps are colorless or white in live colonies (Fig. +8B +; Suppl. material 1: fig. S2B, D). + + + +Habitat and distribution. + + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. was collected at two locations, the northern and central regions of the Gulf of California (where the species is more frequently collected), and +Bahia +Magdalena and Punta Abreojos located along the Pacific coast of Baja California Sur, Mexico (Fig. +1B +). + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. was mostly observed and collected in the Gulf of California on rocky reefs at <30 m depth and it is currently unknown if this species is present in deeper waters. + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. shares habitat with + +Muricea plantaginea + +, + +Muricea fruticosa + +, + +Muricea austera + +, + +Muricea cacao + +sp. nov., + +Leptogorgia alba + +(Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864), and + +Ellisella limbaughi + +Bayer & Deichmann, 1960. Colonies of + +M. ambarae + +sp. nov. distributed in the region of +Bahia +Magdalena grow on rocky reefs, pebbled seafloors between 5-20 m depth, and in forest-like reefs formed by the brown seaweed + +Eisenia arborea + +J.E. Areschoug, 1876 (1-2 m in height) that typically cover large seafloor areas inside the bay. + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. shares habitat in +Bahia +Magdalena with + +Leptogorgia diffusa + +(Verrill, 1868), + +Muricea cacao + +sp. nov., + +M. molinai + +sp. nov., + +M. plantaginea + +, + +M. fruticosa + +, and + +Psammogorgia teres + +Verrill, 1868. + + + +Remarks. + + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. (Fig. +2A, B +) is similar to + +Muricea cacao + +sp. nov. in colony growth form patterns and calyx form (Fig. +4A, C +), but dissimilar in dichotomous branching, lack of pseudoanastomosis, colony coloration, and sclerite appearance (Table +1 +). + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. is also close to + +Muricea fruticosa + +in the shelf-like form of the calyces, but morphologically differs in colony growth and sclerite composition (Table +1 +). + +Muricea fruticosa + +has a bushy growth pattern, irregular branching and its coenenchyme has unilateral spinous spindles. In contrast, + +M. ambarae + +sp. nov. has a planar colony growth, lateral branching, a single chromotype, and leaf spindles (Table +1 +), and + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. has leaf spindles, which are absent in + +M. fruticosa + +. Thus, we propose to include + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. in the + +M. fruticosa + +species-group erected by +Breedy and Guzman (2016a) +. + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. is also close to + +Muricea galapagensis + +Deichmann, 1941, sharing with that species low shelf-like calyces that spread outward, orange colony coloration, and planar colony growth (Table +1 +). However, + +M. galapagensis + +, like that of + +M. fruticosa + +, has falling branches, unilateral spinous spindles, but lacks leaf spindles (Table +1 +). + +Muricea californica + +(Suppl. material 1: fig. S3F-I) is morphologically and biogeographically similar to + +M. ambarae + +sp. nov. (Suppl. material 1: figs S1A-D, S3A-E). However, + +M. californica + +has high variability in colony growth and coloration and its main population densities occurs in California while + +M. ambarae + +sp. nov. is mostly distributed in the northern region Gulf of California and does not show evident morphological variability (Suppl. material 1: fig. S1A-D). We conclude + +M. californica + +and + +M. ambarae + +sp. nov. are distinct species because they show clear differences in calix form and size, branch diameter and sclerites forms. + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. have shelf-like slightly raised calyces, terminal branches of up to 3.5 mm diameter, and an absence of torch spindles in the coenenchyme (Suppl. material 1: fig. S3A-E), while + +M. californica + +has prominent and elongated calyces (almost cylindrical), wider branches of up to 0.5 mm thick, and the presence of torch spindles (Suppl. material 1: fig. S3F-I) ( +Horvath 2019 +). + + + +Figure 4. + +Muricea cacao + +sp. nov. +A +holotype USNM 1606633 +B +anthocodial and coenenchymal sclerites +C +holotype detail of branches. + + + + +Etymology. + +The word " +ambarae +" means +"amber" +, a hard, transparent, fossilized resin produced by some trees. Amber has colorations from pale yellow/orange to a dark orange, like the coloration observed in living colonies of + +Muricea ambarae + +sp. nov. Mexican amber, also known as Chiapas Amber, dates from 15 to 23 million years old. Since the time of the Mayan culture, its people have believed amber to have healing and protective qualities. The species name is also inspired from the name of the daughter ( +Ambar +) of Carlos +Sanchez +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/30/60/37306084EC2769E111E6AD60D63460DB.xml b/data/37/30/60/37306084EC2769E111E6AD60D63460DB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..14d68aa048a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/30/60/37306084EC2769E111E6AD60D63460DB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + +Hornmilben (Oribatida) [pages 418 to 494] + + + +Author + +Weigmann, G. + + + +Author + +Miko, L. + +text + + +2006 +Goecke & Evers + +Keltern + + + +Hornmilben (Oribatida) [Dahl, Tierwelt Deutschlands, Teil 76] + + + +418 +494 + + + + +http://www.goeckeevers.de/verlag/dahl.html + +book chapter +Weigmann2006pp418to494 + + + + +Siculobata leontonycha +(Berlese, 1910) [227c,d] + + + + +Diagnose: NG-Vorderrand gebogen; ss mit +laenglich-gerundetem +Kopf; B 3-krallig, Mittelkralle eng +zurueckgebogen +; Solenidien auf TiIII und IV +geknoepft +; Rostrum mit scharfer Spitze; FeII wenig +blattfoermig +verbreitert; +Koerper +435-500 µm lang. + + + + +Syn., Tax.: +Oribella leontonycha Berlese +, 1910. +Liebstadia l. +: Vitzthum 1926 (B); Willmann 1931 (B). +Paraleius l. +: Trave 1960 (B); Wunderle et al. 1990 (B); Perez-Inigo 1993 (B); Mahunka 1996a (B). + + + + +Die Differentialmerkmale werden nur als Artmerkmale gewertet; der +uebereinstimmende +Lamellen-Komplex +begruendet +die +Zugehoerigkeit +zu +Siculobata +und die Synonymie von +Paraleius +Trave, 1960. + + + + +Oekologie +: In vermoderndem Holz und unter Baumrinde, in +Borkenkaefergaengen +(Norton 1980 vermutet Phoresie auf +Borkenkaefern +). + + + +Verbreitung: Holarktis. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/31/58/373158D1E4C26ACDD90AC0CC04BDDD47.xml b/data/37/31/58/373158D1E4C26ACDD90AC0CC04BDDD47.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..69a8d811445 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/31/58/373158D1E4C26ACDD90AC0CC04BDDD47.xml @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part E) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +490 +515 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Erica persoluta +Linnaeus + +, + + +Diss. Botanicum de +Erica + + +: 9. 1770 + + +. + + + +RCN: 2727. + + + +Lectotype +(designated here by +Oliver +): +N.L. Burman 73 +, + +Herb. Linn. No. 498.22 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + +Erica subdivaricata +P.J. Bergius + +( +Ericaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/28/373228C245C758EAA85062FC76C5C5D4.xml b/data/37/32/28/373228C245C758EAA85062FC76C5C5D4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..471867830a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/28/373228C245C758EAA85062FC76C5C5D4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,220 @@ + + + +Ornithischian dinosaurs in Southeast Asia: a review with palaeobiogeographic implications + + + +Author + +Manitkoon, Sita +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0375-329X +Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang, Mahasarakham, 44150, Thailand + + + +Author + +Deesri, Uthumporn +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6095-8654 +Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang, Mahasarakham, 44150, Thailand +uthumporn_deesri@yahoo.com + + + +Author + +Warapeang, Prapasiri +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7999-0323 +Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang, Mahasarakham, 44150, Thailand + + + +Author + +Nonsrirach, Thanit +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7432-628X +Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang, Mahasarakham, 44150, Thailand + + + +Author + +Chanthasit, Phornphen +Palaeontological Research and Education Centre, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang, Mahasarakham, 44150, Thailand + +text + + +Fossil Record + + +2023 + +2023-01-10 + + +26 + + +1 + + +1 +25 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/fr.26.e93456 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/fr.26.e93456 +2193-0074-1-1 +F8C273F5D7C54A5CBF0A56C7C3085D55 +31E88D0E24BE5C97B7D3DF99135E1514 + + + + + +Ratchasimasaurus suranareae Basal neornithischian indet. ('Dan Luang +neornithischian' +) + + + + +Material. + +SM2016-1-081, a left femur ( +Buffetaut et al. 2003 +, +2006 +, +2014 +) (Fig. +5 +). + + + +Locality and age. +Dan Luang locality, Kamcha-I District, Mukdahan Province; upper Phu Kradung Formation,?Early Cretaceous. + + +Figure 5. +Left femur of the 'Dan Luang +neornithischian' +(SM2016-1-081) in anterior ( +A +), posterior ( +B +), lateral ( +C +) medial ( +D +) proximal ( +E +) and distal ( +F +) views; Reconstruction showing the bone in left lateral view ( +G +); Abbreviations: fh, femoral head; ft, fourth trochanter; gt, greater trochanter; mc, medial condyle; lc, lateral condyle; lt, lesser trochanter; pg, posterior intercondyle groove. Scale bar: 5 cm. + + + + +Previous study. + +This is the first basal neornithischian specimen to have been discovered in Thailand, excavated in 1996, but it has not yet been described ( +Buffetaut and Suteethorn 1998a +; +Buffetaut et al. 2001 +, +2002 +, +2003 +, +2006 +). Buffetaut and Suteethorn considered that it is generally similar to + +Yandusaurus + +(= + +Hexinlusaurus multidens + +) from China ( +Buffetaut and Suteethorn 1998a +). + + + +Description. + +The left femur is robust and almost complete, except the distal end is eroded. It is 12.08 cm in length, and has a transverse mid-shaft diameter of 1.57 cm. The shaft of the femur is bowed in the lateral view resembling that of those early ornithopods and basal neornithischians, such as + +Hexinlusaurus multidens + +( +He and Cai 1984 +), + +Agilisaurus louderbacki + +( +Peng 1992 +), + +Hypsilophodon foxii + +( +Galton 2009 +) and the Phu Noi neornithischian ( +Manitkoon et al. 2019 +). The femoral head is mostly intact, but the finished, articular surface is unpreserved. The anterior end of the greater trochanter is slightly convex, while the posterior end is strongly convex. The greater trochanter lies upon the same plane as the femoral head. The lesser trochanter is distinguished from the greater trochanter by a deep groove. The fourth trochanter, located on the medial margin, is incomplete, its position being in the proximal half of the femur as in PRC 150. An oval fossa occurs between the base of the fourth trochanter and the femoral shaft for muscle insertion. The distal portion of the femoral shaft shows mediolaterally expansion towards the distal condyles and, although it was damaged, posteriorly the distal condyles are separated by a caudal intercondylar groove. + + + +Comments. + +The Dan Luang locality has yielded mamenchisaurid teeth ( +Suteethorn et al. 2013 +), a possible mamenchisaurid rib, theropod teeth, crocodyliform osteoderms and large teeth resembling the pholidosaurid + +Chalawan thailandicus + +( +Buffetaut and Ingavat 1980 +; +Martin et al. 2014 +), shell fragments of the basal trionychoid turtle + +Basilochelys macrobios + +( +Tong et al. 2009 +), petrified wood, and amber. The site belongs to the upper part of the Phu Kradung Formation (?basal Cretaceous), based on the appearance of large pholidosaurid crocodylomorphs and large trionychoid turtles. This contrasts with the semi-aquatic fauna, such as the small xinjiangchelyid turtles + +Phunoichelys thirakhupti + +, and + +Kalasinemys prasarttongosothi + +( +Tong et al. 2015 +, +2019b +), and teleosaurid + +Indosinosuchus potamosiamensis + +( +Martin et al. 2019 +), from the lower Phu Kradung localities, such as Phu Noi. We suggest that SM2016-1-081 belongs in a basal position in Neornithischia, as with the older Phu Noi taxon, but more specimens are needed to increase our understanding of the basal neornithischians from the upper Phu Kradung Formation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/30/373230558530CA1356965C44FDE60FA0.xml b/data/37/32/30/373230558530CA1356965C44FDE60FA0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e4cde335b18 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/30/373230558530CA1356965C44FDE60FA0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@ + + + +Taxonomy of the water beetle genus Limnebius Leach in southern Africa (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) + + + +Author + +Perkins, Philip D. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2015 + +3948 + + +1 + + +41 +59 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3948.1.3 +e44f3143-48ff-4576-9107-0672582bd2f5 +1175-5326 +288366 +0953E397-4543-4D3C-861F-415447C08179 + + + + + + + +Limnebius kavango + +, +new species + + + + +Figs. 9 +(habitus), 20 (aedeagus), 32 (map) + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +(male): + +Namibia +: + +Kavango +: Mahango Game Reserve, +18° 17' S +, +21° 43' E +, +28 ii 1992 +, M. Uhlig ( +ZMHB +). + +Paratypes +(3): +Namibia +: + +East Caprivi: Katima Mulilo, lux, +17° 29' S +, +24° 17' E +, +3–8 iii 1992 +, M. Uhlig (2 +ZMHB +); +Kavango +: Mahango Game Reserve, +18° 17' S +, +21° 43' E +, +28 ii 1992 +, M. Uhlig (1 +ZMHB +). + + +Differential diagnosis. +Habitus as illustrated ( +Fig. 9 +); a small species with body form markedly drop-shaped, apically distinctly acuminate, pronotal disc non-microreticulate, elytra weakly microreticulate. The aedeagus ( +Fig. 20 +) is long and slender; distal 1/3 distinctly arcuate in ventral view, this area slightly widened and internally with the capsule; entire main piece arcuate in lateral view; apex with small, subrectangular process at the base of which is the gonopore; sparse setae apically, as illustrated. The aedeagus shows some similarity with that of + +L. probus + +, but distinctly differs in curvatures and shape of the apex. + + + + +FIGURES 12–15. +Aedeagi of holotypes. + + + + +FIGURES 16–19. +Aedeagi of holotypes. + + + + +Description +. Size: +holotype +(length/width, mm): body (length to elytral apices) 0.84/0.50; pronotum 0.19/ 0.50; elytra 0.59/0.50; approximate height, lateral view 0.34. Dorsum dark brown to piceous. Body form distinctly drop-shaped, apically distinctly acuminate, side margin indented slightly where pronotum joins elytra. Pronotum with disc shining, non-microreticulate, very sparsely finely punctulate, each puncture with very short adpressed seta; area posterior to eye (side view) with few distinctly larger punctures, each puncture with adpressed seta, longer than setae on disc. Elytra very weakly microreticulate, almost obsolete, with punctures and setae similar to those on pronotum. Males with first three pro- and mesotarsal segments slightly enlarged, with adhesive setae. Labroclypeal suture arcuate in frontal view in both sexes. Labrum simple. Elytral apices slightly more truncate in males than in females. + + + + +Etymology. +Named in reference to the geographical distribution. +Distribution. +Currently known from one locality each in the +Kavango +area and Caprivi strip of +Namibia +( +Fig. 32 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/30/373230558532CA165696590CF9E80AC3.xml b/data/37/32/30/373230558532CA165696590CF9E80AC3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fe383b0e744 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/30/373230558532CA165696590CF9E80AC3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ + + + +Taxonomy of the water beetle genus Limnebius Leach in southern Africa (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) + + + +Author + +Perkins, Philip D. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2015 + +3948 + + +1 + + +41 +59 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3948.1.3 +e44f3143-48ff-4576-9107-0672582bd2f5 +1175-5326 +288366 +0953E397-4543-4D3C-861F-415447C08179 + + + + + + + +Limnebius retiolus + +, +new species + + + + +Figs. 7 +(habitus), 18 (aedeagus), 34 (map) + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +(male): + +South Africa +: Northern Cape Province + +, Cape Farm Ezelsfontein, shore washing, +30° 24' S +, +18° 5' E +, +30 x 1977 +, Endrödy-Younga (#1407) ( +TMSA +). + +Paratypes +(31): +South Africa +: Northern Cape Province + +, Same data as +holotype +(16 +TMSA +); Cape Region, +12 km +SE Garies, drying stream, +30° 33' S +, +22° 56' E +, +20 ii 1997 +, G. Challet (15 +NMW +). + + +Differential Diagnosis. +Habitus as illustrated ( +Fig. 7 +); a small species with oval body form, and distinctly microreticulate dorsum. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 18 +) relatively short and wide, moderately arcuate in ventral view; apically produced in a large lobe; long setae in a row, located subapically and to the right side, and shorter setae distributed around apical lobe, as illustrated; internal capsule approximately located in middle ½ of aedeagus; gonopore located in area of row of setae. The general aedeagal shape suggests a relationship with + +L. capensis + +and + +L. suaviculus + +. + + + + +Description +. Size: +holotype +(length/width, mm): body (length to elytral apices) 0.95/0.51; pronotum 0.24/ 0.51; elytra 0.59/0.51; approximate height, lateral view 0.34. + +Dorsum brown to dark brown, slightly paler laterally on clypeus. Body form drop-shaped, apically moderately acuminate, side margin indented slightly where pronotum joins elytra. Dorsum microreticulate, dull, very sparsely finely punctulate, each puncture with very short adpressed seta; area posterior to eye (side view) with few slightly larger punctures, each puncture with adpressed seta, longer than setae on disc. Males with first three pro- and mesotarsal segments slightly enlarged, with adhesive setae. Labroclypeal suture bisinuate in frontal view in both sexes. Labrum simple. Elytral apices slightly more widely rounded in males than in females. + + + +Etymology. +Named in reference to the microreticulate dorsum. + + + + +Distribution. +Currently known from two localities in the Northern Cape Province ( +Fig. 34 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/30/373230558532CA1756965E8EFC6A0D94.xml b/data/37/32/30/373230558532CA1756965E8EFC6A0D94.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..464df485509 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/30/373230558532CA1756965E8EFC6A0D94.xml @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ + + + +Taxonomy of the water beetle genus Limnebius Leach in southern Africa (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) + + + +Author + +Perkins, Philip D. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2015 + +3948 + + +1 + + +41 +59 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3948.1.3 +e44f3143-48ff-4576-9107-0672582bd2f5 +1175-5326 +288366 +0953E397-4543-4D3C-861F-415447C08179 + + + + + + + +Limnebius speculus + +, +new species + + + + +Figs. 8 +(habitus), 19 (aedeagus), 29 (map) + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +(male): + +South Africa +: KwaZulu-Natal Province + +, Hluhluwe Game Reserve, shore washing, +28° 5' S +, +32° 4' E +, +17 xi 1992 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2824) ( +TMSA +). + +Paratypes +(106) + +: + +South Africa +: KwaZulu-Natal Province + +, Hluhluwe Game Res., shore washing, shade, +28° 5' S +, +32° 4' E +, +27 xi 1992 +, Endrödy- Younga (#2861) (5 +TMSA +); Hluhluwe Game Res., shore washing, slow water, +28° 5' S +, +32° 4' E +, +27 xi 1992 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2862) (51 +TMSA +); Hluhluwe Game Reserve, shore washing, +28° 5' S +, +32° 4' E +, +17 xi 1992 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2824)(44 +TMSA +); +Mpumalanga Province +, c. Transvaal, Roodeplaat Dam, shore washing, +25° 37' S +, +28° 23' E +, +14 viii 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#359) (6 +TMSA +). + + +Differential diagnosis. +Habitus as illustrated ( +Fig. 8 +); a very small species with body form slightly dropshaped, apically distinctly acuminate, pronotal disc and elytral disc non-microreticulate, strongly shining; the dorsum is brown, head usually darker than pronotum, except light brown laterally on clypeus. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 19 +) with distal ½ widened, especially on left side (ventral aspect); internal capsule located in widened area; setae sparse, three in row on left side, and a cluster on apical lobe; apex with two dissimilarly shaped lobes, only one with setae. + + + + +Description +. Size: +holotype +(length/width, mm): body (length to elytral apices) 0.86/0.45; pronotum 0.19/ 0.45; elytra 0.56/0.43; approximate height, lateral view 0.30. + +Dorsum brown, head usually darker than pronotum, except light brown laterally on clypeus. Body form distinctly drop-shaped, apically distinctly acuminate, side margin indented slightly where pronotum joins elytra. Pronotum with disc strongly shining, non-microreticulate, very sparsely finely punctulate, each puncture with very short adpressed seta; area posterior to eye (side view) with few distinctly larger punctures, each puncture with adpressed seta, longer than setae on disc. Elytra with disc non-microreticulate, gradually becoming very weakly microreticulate, almost obsolete, laterally and apically; with punctures and setae similar to those on pronotum. Males with first three pro- and mesotarsal segments slightly enlarged, with adhesive setae. Labroclypeal suture slightly bisinuate in frontal view in both sexes. Labrum simple. Elytral apices slightly more rounded in males than in females. + + + +Etymology. +Named in reference to the shining, mirror-like dorsum. + + + + +Distribution. +Currently known from one locality each in KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga Provinces, +South Africa +( +Fig. 29 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/30/373230558533CA145696587FF8BF0F8C.xml b/data/37/32/30/373230558533CA145696587FF8BF0F8C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..33df8ca9e8a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/30/373230558533CA145696587FF8BF0F8C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ + + + +Taxonomy of the water beetle genus Limnebius Leach in southern Africa (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) + + + +Author + +Perkins, Philip D. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2015 + +3948 + + +1 + + +41 +59 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3948.1.3 +e44f3143-48ff-4576-9107-0672582bd2f5 +1175-5326 +288366 +0953E397-4543-4D3C-861F-415447C08179 + + + + + + + +Limnebius suaviculus + +, +new species + + + + +Figs. 10 +(habitus), 21 (aedeagus), 31 (map) + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +(male): + +South Africa +: KwaZulu-Natal Province + +, Tugela River nr. Olivershoek road, washed from stony and sandy banks, elev. +1130 m +, +28° 41' S +, +29° 10' E +, +6 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne ( +BMNH +). + +Paratypes +(121): +South Africa +: Eastern Cape Province + +, Road between Queenstown and Lady Frere, on stones in running water in small stream, elev. +1158.24 m +, +31° 54' S +, +27° 40' E +, +26 iii 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (97) (4 +BMNH +); +Free State Province +, Kareefontein nr. Nylstroom, rapid stream over rock and gravel, elev. +1460 m +, +28° 25' S +, +26° 53' E +, +16 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (164) (44 +BMNH +); +KwaZulu-Natal Province +, Bergville, Tugela River, elev. +1158 m +, +28° 44' S +, +29° 21' E +, +6 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (148) (15 +BMNH +); nr. Bergville, small unnamed spruit, from fast water in gravel at edges, elev. +1188 m +, +28° 44' S +, +29° 21' E +, +6 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (22 +BMNH +); nr. Bergville, small unnamed spruit, in side pools among muddy stones and sand, +28° 44' S +, +29° 21' E +, +4 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (142) (8 +BMNH +); nr. Bergville, small unnamed spruit, pools in dry bed, slab rock, muddy grit, elev. +1143 m +, +28° 44' S +, +29° 21' E +, +6 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (150) (5 +BMNH +); Tugela River nr. Olivershoek road, washed from stony and sandy banks, elev. +1130 m +, +28° 41' S +, +29° 10' E +, +6 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour- Browne (15 +BMNH +); +Limpopo Province +, Blauberg, Beauly River, from boulder and fine gravel, fast water, elev. +1143 m +, +23° 8' S +, +28° 56' E +, +18 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (173) (6 +BMNH +). + + +Differential diagnosis. +Habitus as illustrated ( +Fig. 10 +); a small species with oval body form, and with pronotum and elytra shining, non-microreticulate and very sparsely finely punctulate. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 21 +) relatively short, weakly arcuate in ventral view; apically produced in a large lobe, with setae around margin and in sparse row toward left side, as illustrated; internal capsule approximately located in distal 1/2 of aedeagus; gonopore located in area of row of setae. The general aedeagal shape suggests a relationship with + +L. retiolus + +and + +L. capensis +. + + + + + +Description +. Size: +holotype +(length/width, mm): body (length to elytral apices) 0.89/0.48; pronotum 0.24/ 0.47; elytra 0.49/0.48; approximate height, lateral view 0.30. Pronotum with brown, diffusely margined macula on anterior ¾ of disc, remainder of pronotum, and elytra, light brown to testaceous. Body form elongate oval, not drop-shaped, side margin indented slightly where pronotum joins elytra. Pronotum and elytra shining, nonmicroreticulate, very sparsely finely punctulate, each puncture with very short adpressed seta; area posterior to eye (side view) with subserial, unilinear row of distinctly larger punctures, each puncture with adpressed seta, longer than setae on disc. Elytra very weakly microreticulate, almost obsolete, with punctures and setae similar to those on pronotum. Males with first three pro- and mesotarsal segments slightly enlarged, with adhesive setae. Labroclypeal suture arcuate in frontal view in both sexes. Labrum simple. Elytral apices slightly with lateral angle more rectangulate in males than in females. + + + + +Etymology. +Named in reference to the caramel-like dorsal color. + + + + +Distribution. +As +currently known, widely but very sparsely distributed in northeastern +South Africa +( +Fig. 31 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/30/373230558537CA0F56965C22FFC40E18.xml b/data/37/32/30/373230558537CA0F56965C22FFC40E18.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ff7b38cf3d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/30/373230558537CA0F56965C22FFC40E18.xml @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@ + + + +Taxonomy of the water beetle genus Limnebius Leach in southern Africa (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) + + + +Author + +Perkins, Philip D. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2015 + +3948 + + +1 + + +41 +59 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3948.1.3 +e44f3143-48ff-4576-9107-0672582bd2f5 +1175-5326 +288366 +0953E397-4543-4D3C-861F-415447C08179 + + + + + + + +Limnebius masculinus + +, +new species + + + + +Figs. 11 +(habitus), 22 (aedeagus), 30 (map) + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +(male): + +South Africa +: KwaZulu-Natal Province + +, Hluhluwe Game Res., shore washing, shade, +28° 5' S +, +32° 4' E +, +27 xi 1992 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2861) ( +TMSA +). + +Paratypes +(52): +South Africa +: Eastern Cape Province + +, +10 mi +. N. Alice, +32° 37' S +, +26° 56' E +, +17 iii 1968 +, P. J. Spangler (1 +USNM +); Transkei: S. coast, Dwesa forest reserve, shore washing, forest, +32° 17' S +, +28° 50' E +, +3 iii 1985 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2181) (3 +TMSA +); +KwaZulu-Natal Province +, Hluhluwe Game Res., shore washing, shade, +28° 5' S +, +32° 4' E +, +27 xi 1992 +, Endrödy- Younga (#2861) (37 +TMSA +); Hluhluwe Game Res., shore washing, slow water, +28° 5' S +, +32° 4' E +, +27 xi 1992 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2862) (10 +TMSA +); Port St. Johns, +28° 6' S +, +30° 36' E +, +21 iii 1968 +, P. J. Spangler (1 +USNM +). + + +Differential diagnosis. +Large species, very convex and with oval body form ( +Fig. 11 +), pronotal disc nonmicroreticulate, elytra very weakly microreticulate. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 22 +) large and robust, base slightly widened and housing internal capsule; distal part with setae as illustrated; apex with oval lobe, wrinkled on surface, and emerging from this a rigid, arcuate, tube-like internal duct, apparently permanently everted. + + + + +FIGURES 23–24. +Geographical distributions. + + + + +FIGURES 25–27. +Geographical distributions. + + + + +Description +. Size: +holotype +(length/width, mm): body (length to elytral apices) 1.24/0.70; pronotum 0.28/ 0.70; elytra 0.86/0.72; approximate height, lateral view 0.49. + +Dorsum dark brown to piceous, except usually lighter brown laterally on clypeus. Body form elongate oval, very convex, not drop-shaped, side margin indented slightly where pronotum joins elytra. Pronotum with disc shining, non-microreticulate, very sparsely finely punctulate, each puncture with very short adpressed seta; area posterior to eye (side view) with few distinctly larger punctures, each puncture with adpressed seta, longer than setae on disc. Elytra very weakly microreticulate, almost obsolete, with punctures and setae similar to those on pronotum. +Males with first three pro- and mesotarsal segments slightly enlarged, with adhesive setae. Labroclypeal suture arcuate in frontal view in both sexes. Labrum simple. Elytral apices markedly truncate in males, less so in females. + + + +FIGURES 28–31. +Geographical distributions. + + + + +Etymology. +Named in reference to the robust and strong male genitalia. +Distribution. +Currently known from two localities each in the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal Provinces ( +Fig. 30 +). + + +Note. +On the basis of the robust male genitalia this species may prove to be related to + +L. jeanneli +Orchymont + +, a species described from +Kenya +( +Orchymont, 1948 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/30/37323055853BCA1D56965D1CFF2608E7.xml b/data/37/32/30/37323055853BCA1D56965D1CFF2608E7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0fe3b403ede --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/30/37323055853BCA1D56965D1CFF2608E7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,490 @@ + + + +Taxonomy of the water beetle genus Limnebius Leach in southern Africa (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) + + + +Author + +Perkins, Philip D. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2015 + +3948 + + +1 + + +41 +59 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3948.1.3 +e44f3143-48ff-4576-9107-0672582bd2f5 +1175-5326 +288366 +0953E397-4543-4D3C-861F-415447C08179 + + + + + + + +Limnebius endroedyi + +, +new species + + + + +Figs. 1 +(habitus), 12 (aedeagus), 25 (map) + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +(male): + +Namibia +: + +C. Namib desert, Numis Wasser, shore washing, +26° 3' S +, +16° 15' E +, +9 viii 1989 +, Endrödy-Younga & Klimaszewski (#2642) ( +TMSA +). A total of 4,335 additional specimens; specimens are + +paratypes + +unless otherwise noted: + +Namibia +: + +Aub, +20 mi +. S of Windhoek, spring and pools in sand river bed, elev. +1905 m +, +22° 56' S +, +17° 12' E +, +18 v 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (209) (24 +BMNH +); C. Namib desert, Numis Wasser, shore washing, +26° 3' S +, +16° 15' E +, +9 viii 1989 +, Endrödy-Younga & Klimaszewski (#2642)(245 +paratypes +, 910 non-types +TMSA +); Damaraland, groot Barmen, shore washing, +22° 5' S +, +16° 40' E +, +12 ix 1975 +, Endrödy- Younga (#370) (8 +TMSA +); Gt. Namaqualand, Frm Kub Süd, Fish R., shore washing, +24° 14' S +, +17° 30' E +, +2 viii 1981 +, Endrödy-Younga (#1819) (130 +TMSA +); Khomashochl., Farm Wissenfels, shore washing, +23° 20' S +, +16° 25' E +, +14 ix 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#371) (140 +TMSA +); Koriankab Waterhole, +10 mi +. WNW Windhoek, Bare sand and gravel shores, elev. +1676 m +, +22° 30' S +, +16° 56' E +, +19 v 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (212) (39 +BMNH +); Maltah. D., Farm Kamkas 20, shore washing, +24° 36' S +, +16° 37' E +, +28 x 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#435) (48 +TMSA +); Namib, Gobabeb, shore washing, +23° 34' S +, +15° 3' E +, +7 ix 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#363) (38 +TMSA +); Namib - Naukluft Park, Naukluft spring, spring, +24° 15' S +, +16° 14' E +, +28–30 xi 1997 +, Kirk-Spriggs & Marais (2 +SMW +); Naukluft cascades, cascades, +24° 16' S +, +16° 15' E +, +12 viii 1989 +, Endrödy-Younga & Klimaszewski (#2648) (2 +TMSA +); Naukluft, Felseneck farm, shore washing, +24° 12' S +, +16° 4' E +, +24 x 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#414)(38 +paratypes +, 800 non-types +TMSA +); Naukluft, Naukluft Park, shore washing, +24° 16' S +, +16° 15' E +, +26 x 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#431) (69 +TMSA +); Naukluft River, shore washing, +24° 16' S +, +16° 15' E +, +10 viii 1989 +, Endrödy-Younga & Klimaszewski (#2644)(28 +paratypes +, 183 non-types +TMSA +); Windhoek, Eros Mt., shore washing, elev. +1600 m +, +22° 34' S +, +17° 6' E +, +10 ix 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#365) (58 +TMSA +); same locality, elev. +1600 m +, +22° 34' S +, +17° 6' E +, +10 ix 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#367) (92 +TMSA +); Windhoek, Regenstein, ground traps for 10 days, +22° 36' S +, +16° 59' E +, +24 viii 1975 +, Endrödy-Younga (#869) (4 +TMSA +); Windhoek, Aris Dam, in storage dam, sandy gravel edges, little vegetation, elev. +1654 m +, +22° 34' S +, +17° 5' E +, +17 v 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (205) (5 +BMNH +); +Eastern Cape Province +, +10 mi +. N. Alice, +32° 37' S +, +26° 56' E +, +17 iii 1968 +, P. J. Spangler (16 +USNM +); Cape-Karroo, Wilgeboom R., Cradock, water coll., +32° 15' S +, +25° 26' E +, +22 ii 1978 +, W. Breytenbach (WB: 104,105) (3 +TMSA +); Freddy Van Zyl Bridge, Oorlog Spruit, spruit, elev. +1036.32 m +, +30° 41' S +, +25° 19' E +, +25 ii 1947 +, J. Omer-Cooper (8 +BMNH +); Road between Queenstown and Lady Frere, on stones in running water in small stream, elev. +1158.24 m +, +31° 54' S +, +27° 40' E +, +26 iii 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (97) (3 +BMNH +); Sundays River, near Addo, in silt at sides of river, +33° 44' S +, +25° 42' E +, +21 iii 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (1 +BMNH +); Gauteng, Suikerbosrand Rivier, near Heidelberg, fast flowing stream with gritty sand, elev. +1530 m +, +26° 31' S +, +28° 21' E +, +8 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (163) (4 +BMNH +); +KwaZulu-Natal Province +, Bergville District, Lawford’s Spruit near Bergville, shallow stream, sand and gravel on rocky bed, elev. +1295.4 m +, +28° 44' S +, +29° 21' E +, +4 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (41 +BMNH +); Bergville, Mkombe River, fine gravel at edges, elev. +1036 m +, +28° 41' S +, +29° 10' E +, +6 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (149) (14 +BMNH +); Buffalo River System (BF numbers), river, +27° 42' S +, +30° 33' E +, +23 iv 1974 +, collector unknown(1 +AMG +); Drake Spruit, nr. Estcourt, in side gravel of gritty stream, elev. +1220 m +, +29° 17' S +, +29° 30' E +, +2 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (135) (65 +BMNH +); nr. Bergville, small unnamed spruit, from fast water in gravel at edges, elev. +1188 m +, +28° 44' S +, +29° 21' E +, +6 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (1 +BMNH +); nr. Bergville, small unnamed spruit, in side pools among muddy stones and sand, +28° 44' S +, +29° 21' E +, +4 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (142) (3 +BMNH +); +Mpumalanga Province +, Bundu Inn, shore washing, +25° 28' S +, +28° 55' E +, +24 iii 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#304) (23 +TMSA +); S. Transvaal, Roberts Drift, Vaal R., sifted flood debris, +27° 2' S +, +29° 2' E +, +8 x 1973 +, Endrödy- Younga (#190) (32 +TMSA +); Vaal River where crossed by road from Morgenzon to Amersfoort, VAL Stn. 3, river, +26° 51' S +, +29° 42' E +,, collector unknown(1 +AMG +); +Western Cape Province +, +22 mi +. N. Nelspoort, +31° 51' S +, +22° 57' E +, +3 iii 1968 +, P. J. Spangler (14 +USNM +); Langeberg, Ruiterbos For. St., river stones, +33° 54' S +, +22° 2' E +, +4 xi 1993 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2942) (1 +TMSA +); Little Karroo, Kammanasieberge, water and shore, +33° 37' S +, +22° 33' E +, +21 xi 1992 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2931) (1 +TMSA +); Malmesbury District, Kalabaskraal, roadside pond with much Juncus and Nitella, elev. +105 m +, +33° 28' S +, +18° 43' E +, +27 vii 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (Stn. No. 326) (1 +BMNH +); Swartberg, Meiringspoort cent., shore washing, +33° 25' S +, +22° 33' E +, +1 xi 1993 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2925) (43 +paratypes +, 332 non-types +TMSA +); Swartberg, Meiringspoort, shore washing, +33° 25' S +, +22° 33' E +, +1 xi 1993 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2924) (83 +paratypes +, 780 non-types +TMSA +). + + +Differential diagnosis. +Habitus as in +Fig. 1 +; a moderately small species with elongate oval body form, nonmicroreticulate pronotal disc and weakly microreticulate elytra. The aedeagus ( +Fig. 12 +) is slightly arcuate in both views; slightly widened basally; apex rather sharply rounded, wider in ventral than lateral aspect, with a row of short setae on each side; internal duct usually not protruded (protruded in +holotype +). Males can be recognized by the excavate lateral margins of the labrum. + + + + +Description +. Size: +holotype +(length/width, mm): body (length to elytral apices) 1.03/0.49; pronotum 0.26/ 0.49; elytra 0.61/0.48; approximate height, lateral view 0.33. Dorsum brown to piceous, head and pronotum usually darker than elytra. Body form elongate oval, not drop-shaped, side margin indented slightly where pronotum joins elytra. Pronotum with disc shining, non-microreticulate, very sparsely finely punctulate, each puncture with very short adpressed seta; area posterior to eye (side view) with subserial, unilinear row of distinctly larger punctures, each puncture with adpressed seta, longer than setae on disc. Elytra very weakly microreticulate, almost obsolete, with punctures and setae similar to those on pronotum. + + + +FIGURES 1–4. +Dorsal and lateral habitus views of holotypes. + + + +Males with first three pro- and mesotarsal segments slightly enlarged, with adhesive setae. Labroclypeal suture bisinuate in frontal view in both sexes. Labrum of male with anterior margin slightly thickened over median ½, lateral area on each side excavate ( +Fig. 1 +); labrum of female simple. Elytral apices slightly more widely rounded in males than in females. + + + + +Etymology. +Named in honor of Sebastian Endrödy-Younga. + + + + +Distribution. +Widely but rather sparsely distributed in southern and eastern +South Africa +, with a disjunct population in +Namibia +( +Fig. 25 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/30/37323055853CCA1656965D72F8B00D40.xml b/data/37/32/30/37323055853CCA1656965D72F8B00D40.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f2e5ed45b9f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/30/37323055853CCA1656965D72F8B00D40.xml @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@ + + + +Taxonomy of the water beetle genus Limnebius Leach in southern Africa (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) + + + +Author + +Perkins, Philip D. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2015 + +3948 + + +1 + + +41 +59 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3948.1.3 +e44f3143-48ff-4576-9107-0672582bd2f5 +1175-5326 +288366 +0953E397-4543-4D3C-861F-415447C08179 + + + + + + + +Limnebius capensis + +, +new species + + + + +Figs. 6 +(habitus), 17 (aedeagus), 26 (map) + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +(male): + +South Africa +: Western Cape Province + +, W. Cape, Hawequas, shore washing, +33° 34' S +, +19° 8' E +, +10 xi 1973 +, Endrödy-Younga (#226) ( +TMSA +). + +Paratypes +(36): +South Africa +: Eastern Cape Province + +, Uitenhage District, Van Staaden’s Pass, in gravel at edge of fast stream, +33° 54' S +, +25° 12' E +, +21 iii 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (84) (11 +BMNH +); +Western Cape Province +, Great Berg River, Bridgetown Station 16, river, +32° 5' S +, +18° 51' E +, +28 i 1952 +, collector unknown( +GBG +505H) (7 +AMG +); Great Berg River, Sandrift Station 19, marginal vegetation, +GBG +547F, +32° 56' S +, +18° 32' E +, +28 iii 1952 +, collector unknown(3 +AMG +); Paarl Vlei on Wemmershoek road; FRW 115M, on mountain side in + +Aponogeton + +and + +Scirpus fluitans + +vegetation, +34° 4' S +, +19° 0' E +, +14 ix 1955 +, collector unknown (FRW +115M. +) (1 +AMG +); S. W. Cape, Nuweberg, +10km +NE, shore washing, +34° 3' S +, +19° 6' E +, +13 xi 1973 +, Endrödy-Younga (#240) (1 +TMSA +); Sandrift Station 19; Albany Museum catalog +GBG +547F, marginal vegetation, +32° 56' S +, +18° 32' E +, +28 iii 1952 +(1 +AMG +); Stream beside R339 road in Prince Alfred’s Pass, ca. +10 km +S of Avontuur, +33° 45' S +, +23° 10' E +, +20 ix 2009 +, D. T. Bilton (4 +DTBC +); W. Wiedouw farm, shore washing, +31° 43' S +, +18° 43' E +, +19 viii 1983 +, Endrödy-Younga (#1946) (1 +TMSA +); Wellington Road Bridge, Stn. 12; Albany Museum catalog +GBG +727A, +33° 35' S +, +19° 1' E +, +23 iii 1953 +, collector unknown (6 +AMG +). + + + +FIGURES 5–8. +Dorsal and lateral habitus views of holotypes. + + + +Differential diagnosis. +Habitus as illustrated ( +Fig. 6 +); a small species with body form slightly drop-shaped, apically moderately acuminate, pronotal disc non-microreticulate, elytra weakly microreticulate. Aedeagus ( +Fig. 17 +) comparatively short, very slightly arcuate in both views, with a large lobe on the right side (ventral view); distal 1/3 with numerous setae, as illustrated; internal capsule located in distal 1/2, not attaining apex, with gonopore approximately located at distal ¾. + + + + +Description +. Size: +holotype +(length/width, mm): body (length to elytral apices) 0.94/0.50; pronotum 0.23/ 0.49; elytra 0.57/0.50; approximate height, lateral view 0.32. + +Dorsum brown to piceous, head and pronotum usually darker than elytra. Body form elongate oval, not dropshaped, side margin indented slightly where pronotum joins elytra. Pronotum with disc shining, nonmicroreticulate, very sparsely finely punctulate, each puncture with very short adpressed seta; laterally very weakly microreticulate; area posterior to eye (side view) with few distinctly larger punctures, each puncture with adpressed seta, longer than setae on disc. Elytra very weakly microreticulate, almost obsolete, with punctures and setae similar to those on pronotum. Males with first three pro- and mesotarsal segments slightly enlarged, with adhesive setae. Labroclypeal suture arcuate or weakly bisinuate in frontal view in both sexes. Labrum of both sexes not perceptibly thickened at free margin, lateral area on each side not excavate. Elytral apices of male and female quite similar. + + + +Etymology. +Named in reference to the geographical distribution. + + + + +Distribution. +Currently known from the Eastern Cape and Western Cape Provinces of +South Africa +( +Fig. 26 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/30/37323055853CCA1856965BF7FF0D0AE7.xml b/data/37/32/30/37323055853CCA1856965BF7FF0D0AE7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4799c2bd749 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/30/37323055853CCA1856965BF7FF0D0AE7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ + + + +Taxonomy of the water beetle genus Limnebius Leach in southern Africa (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) + + + +Author + +Perkins, Philip D. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2015 + +3948 + + +1 + + +41 +59 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3948.1.3 +e44f3143-48ff-4576-9107-0672582bd2f5 +1175-5326 +288366 +0953E397-4543-4D3C-861F-415447C08179 + + + + + + + +Limnebius transversus + +, +new species + + + + +Figs. 5 +(habitus), 16 (aedeagus), 24 (map) + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +(male): + +South Africa +: KwaZulu-Natal Province + +, Mtubatuba, sandy shore washing, +28° 22' S +, +32° 19' E +, +4 iv 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#318) ( +TMSA +). + +Paratypes +(83): +Namibia +: + +Kaokoveld, Kunene River, Swartbooisdrift, shore washing, +17° 19' S +, +13° 49' E +, +10 ii 1975 +, Endrödy-Younga (#645) (22 +TMSA +); + +South Africa +: KwaZulu-Natal Province + +, Mtubatuba, +28° 22' S +, +32° 19' E +, +24–25 iii 1968 +, P. J. Spangler (2 +USNM +); Mtubatuba, muddy shore washing, +28° 22' S +, +32° 19' E +, +4 iv 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#319) (18 +TMSA +); Mtubatuba, sandy shore washing, +28° 22' S +, +32° 19' E +, +4 iv 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#318) (11 +TMSA +); +Limpopo Province +, Kafferboom, unnamed spruit, gravel & sand, +23° 36' S +, +28° 32' E +, +17 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (169a) (17 +BMNH +); N. Transvaal, Waterberg, Farm 223, Mogol River, flood debris, +24° 11' S +, +27° 50' E +, +13 ii 1976 +, A. Strydom, Endrödy-Younga (#1039) (1 +TMSA +); +Mpumalanga Province +, Kruger Nat. Pk., Letaba River below dam, shore washing, +23° 46' S +, +31° 30' E +, +1 iii 1995 +, Endrödy-Younga (#3122) (6 +TMSA +); Kruger Nat. Pk., Punda Maria Ngotsodam, shore washing, +21° 26' S +, +31° 14' E +, +7 ii 1994 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2984) (1 +TMSA +); N. Transvaal, Entabeni - L. Trich., air plankton, +23° 5' S +, +30° 12' E +, +21 iv 1976 +, Endrödy-Younga (#1138) (2 +TMSA +); +Zambia +: Kafue NP, Chunga Camp, lux, +15° 2' S +, +26° 0' E +, +29 iii 1993 +, M. Uhlig (1 +ZMHB +); + +Zimbabwe + +: Matapos [Matobo] National Park, +20° 33' S +, +28° 30' E +, +1–2 iv 1968 +, P. J. Spangler (2 +USNM +). + + +Differential diagnosis. +Habitus as illustrated ( +Fig. 5 +); a small species with body form distinctly drop-shaped, apically distinctly acuminate, pronotal disc non-microreticulate, elytra weakly microreticulate; the dorsum is brown, head usually darker than pronotum, except light brown laterally on clypeus. The aedeagus ( +Fig. 16 +) with distal ½ distinctly widened in both ventral and lateral views, the capsule contained within this area; setae basically in three groups, a row on the left side (ventral view) and two apical clusters, as illustrated; apex in lateral view widened and trilobate, two of the lobes having setae. + + + + +Description +. Size: +holotype +(length/width, mm): body (length to elytral apices) 0.95/0.51; pronotum 0.23/ 0.51; elytra 0.58/0.51; approximate height, lateral view 0.34. + +Dorsum brown, head usually darker than pronotum, except light brown laterally on clypeus. Body form distinctly drop-shaped, apically distinctly acuminate, side margin indented slightly where pronotum joins elytra. Pronotum with disc shining, non-microreticulate, very sparsely finely punctulate, each puncture with very short adpressed seta; area posterior to eye (side view) with few distinctly larger punctures, each puncture with adpressed seta, longer than setae on disc. Elytra very weakly microreticulate, almost obsolete, with punctures and setae similar to those on pronotum. Males with first three pro- and mesotarsal segments slightly enlarged, with adhesive setae. Labroclypeal suture bisinuate in frontal view in both sexes. Labrum of both sexes similar. Elytral apices more rounded and with lateral angles more nearly rectangulate in males; apices more oblique, less rounded, and sutural angle more acute in females. + + + +Etymology. +Named in reference to the transverse body form. + + + + +Distribution. +Currently known from one locality each in +Namibia +and +Zimbabwe +, and a population in northeastern +South Africa +( +Fig. 24 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/30/37323055853ECA1A56965BF7FFF80987.xml b/data/37/32/30/37323055853ECA1A56965BF7FFF80987.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a411a9cec69 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/30/37323055853ECA1A56965BF7FFF80987.xml @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@ + + + +Taxonomy of the water beetle genus Limnebius Leach in southern Africa (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) + + + +Author + +Perkins, Philip D. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2015 + +3948 + + +1 + + +41 +59 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3948.1.3 +e44f3143-48ff-4576-9107-0672582bd2f5 +1175-5326 +288366 +0953E397-4543-4D3C-861F-415447C08179 + + + + + + + +Limnebius convexus + +, +new species + + + + +Figs. 3 +(habitus), 13 (aedeagus), 27 (map) + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +(male): + +South Africa +: Western Cape Province + +, Little Karroo, Raubenheimer Dam, shore washing, +33° 25' S +, +22° 19' E +, +21 x 1993 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2888) ( +TMSA +). A total of 1,001 additional specimens; specimens are + +paratypes + +unless otherwise noted: + +South Africa +: Eastern Cape Province + +, Chapman’s Bay, little pond, +34° 1' S +, +18° 20' E +, +8 vii 1903 +, Vanhoffen, Ernst (2 +ZMHB +); nr. Humansdorp, Gamtoos River, small shallow pool cut in reeds, +34° 0' S +, +24° 48' E +, +20 iii 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (3 +BMNH +); Uitenhage District, Van Staaden’s Pass, in gravel at edge of fast stream, +33° 54' S +, +25° 12' E +, +21 iii 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (84) (20 +BMNH +); +Mpumalanga Province +, E. Transvaal, Blyderiver Canyon, shore washing, +24° 35' S +, +30° 49' E +, +2 v 1981 +, Endrödy-Younga (#1765) (1 +TMSA +); +Western Cape Province +, Cape Flats, Varden Vlei, +2 mi +. E. Ottery, +34° 6' S +, +18° 30' E +, +2 ii 1951 +, Brinck & Rudebeck ( +SSAE +163) (9 LUM); Elandsdrift, shore washing, +34° 39' S +, +19° 53' E +, +24 ii 1981 +, Endrödy-Younga (#1747) (20 +TMSA +); Hex River Mts., +7 km +SW Ceres, Breede River, rockpools, elev. +400 m +, +33° 23' S +, +19° 19' E +, +26 ii 1997 +, Hess (1 +NMW +); Little Karroo, Raubenheimer Dam, shore washing, +33° 25' S +, +22° 19' E +, +21 x 1993 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2888) (22 +TMSA +); Little Karroo, Raubenheimer Dam, shore washing, after debris removed, +33° 25' S +, +22° 19' E +, +21 x 1993 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2889) (146 +TMSA +); Little Karroo, Raubenheimer Dam, water collection, +33° 25' S +, +22° 19' E +, +21 x 1993 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2886) (17 +TMSA +); Nuweberg, +10km +NE, water plankton, +34° 3' S +, +19° 15' E +, +13 xi 1973 +, Endrödy-Younga (#239) (13 +TMSA +); Nuweberg For. Sta., grassnetting nr. dam, +34° 3' S +, +19° 4' E +, +13 xi 1973 +, Endrödy-Younga (#242) (2 +TMSA +); S. W. Cape, Nuweberg, +10km +NE, shore washing, +34° 3' S +, +19° 6' E +, +13 xi 1973 +, Endrödy-Younga (#240) (292 +paratypes +, 436 non-types +TMSA +); SW Cape, Verlorevlei Farm, shore washing, +32° 19' S +, +18° 22' E +, +28 viii 1981 +, Endrödy- Younga (#1857) (12 +TMSA +); Temp. pool beside R324 road +12 km +S. of Barrydale, below Tradouw Pass, +33° 59' S +, +20° 42' E +, +19 ix 2009 +, D. T. Bilton (1 +DTBC +); W. Cape, Hawequas, shore washing, +33° 34' S +, +19° 8' E +, +10 xi 1973 +, Endrödy-Younga (#226) (2 +TMSA +). + + +Differential diagnosis. +Habitus as illustrated ( +Fig. 3 +); a small species with body form distinctly drop-shaped, apically distinctly acuminate, pronotal disc non-microreticulate, elytra weakly microreticulate. The aedeagus ( +Fig. 13 +) is arcuate near the midlength, more strongly so in ventral than in lateral view; the distal part, in ventral view, is widened on the right side, forming an axe or hatchet shape; the distal part has setae as illustrated, including a pair of long setae visible in lateral view; the capsule begins near the base and extends to the apex. The pronotal disc of the +holotype +has a shallow impression on each side, near the base ( +Fig. 3 +); these impressions are not present on most specimens. + + + + +Description +. Size: +holotype +(length/width, mm): body (length to elytral apices) 1.10/0.61; pronotum 0.28/ 0.60; elytra 0.67/0.61; approximate height, lateral view 0.35. Dorsum piceous, elytral apices sometimes slightly paler. Body form distinctly drop-shaped, apically distinctly acuminate, side margin indented slightly where pronotum joins elytra. Pronotum with disc strongly shining, non-microreticulate, very sparsely very finely punctulate, some punctures with very short and fine, nearly imperceptible adpressed seta; areas posterior to eye (side view) and near lateral margin with few distinctly larger punctures, each puncture with adpressed seta, longer than setae on disc. Elytra weakly microreticulate, with punctures and setae similar to those on pronotum. Males with first three pro- and mesotarsal segments slightly enlarged, with adhesive setae. Labroclypeal suture bisinuate in frontal view in both sexes. Labrum of male with anterior margin not thickened, lateral area on each side weakly excavate; labrum of female simple, slightly more deeply apicomedially emarginate than male. Elytral apices slightly more widely rounded in males than in females. + + + + +Etymology. +Named in reference to the convex shape. + + + + +Distribution. +Currently known from the Eastern and Western Cape Provinces of +South Africa +, plus one disjunct locality in Mpumalanga Province ( +Fig. 27 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/30/37323055853ECA1B56965C52F98B0CD8.xml b/data/37/32/30/37323055853ECA1B56965C52F98B0CD8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f3b2661b835 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/30/37323055853ECA1B56965C52F98B0CD8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ + + + +Taxonomy of the water beetle genus Limnebius Leach in southern Africa (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) + + + +Author + +Perkins, Philip D. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2015 + +3948 + + +1 + + +41 +59 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3948.1.3 +e44f3143-48ff-4576-9107-0672582bd2f5 +1175-5326 +288366 +0953E397-4543-4D3C-861F-415447C08179 + + + + + + + +Limnebius probus + +, +new species + + + + +Figs. 2 +(habitus), 14 (aedeagus), 28 (map) + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +(male): + +South Africa +: KwaZulu-Natal Province + +, Zululand, Dukuduku For. Sta., air plankton, sunset, +28° 22' S +, +32° 19' E +, +4 iv 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#323) ( +TMSA +). + +Paratypes +(297): +South Africa +: KwaZulu-Natal Province + +, Ndumu Game Reserve, shore washing, fresh water, +26° 53' S +, +32° 16' E +, +12 vi 1989 +, Endrödy-Younga & Klimaszewski (#2612) (209 +TMSA +); Ndumu Game Reserve, shore washing, salty water, +26° 54' S +, +32° 16' E +, +12 vi 1989 +, Endrödy-Younga & Klimaszewski (#2613) (52 +TMSA +); Zululand, Dukuduku For. Sta., air plankton, sunset, +28° 22' S +, +32° 19' E +, +4 iv 1974 +, Endrödy-Younga (#323) (36 +TMSA +). + + +Differential diagnosis. +Habitus as illustrated ( +Fig. 2 +); a small species with body form distinctly drop-shaped, apically distinctly acuminate, pronotal disc non-microreticulate, elytra weakly microreticulate. The aedeagus ( +Fig. 14 +) is long and slender; distal ½ slightly arcuate in ventral view, bearing two rows of setae, this area slightly widened and internally with the capsule; apex slightly, rectangularly produced. + + + + +Description +. Size: +holotype +(length/width, mm): body (length to elytral apices) 0.90/0.51; pronotum 0.24/ 0.51; elytra 0.53/0.50; approximate height, lateral view 0.37. Dorsum brown to dark brown, head and pronotum usually darker than elytra. Body form distinctly drop-shaped, apically distinctly acuminate, side margin very weakly indented where pronotum joins elytra. Pronotum with disc shining, non-microreticulate, very sparsely finely punctulate, each puncture with very short, very fine, indistinct adpressed seta; area posterior to eye (side view) with field of distinctly larger punctures, each puncture with adpressed seta, longer than setae on disc. Elytra very weakly microreticulate, almost obsolete, with punctures and setae similar to those on pronotum. Males with first three pro- and mesotarsal segments slightly enlarged, with adhesive setae. Labroclypeal suture bisinuate in frontal view in both sexes. Labrum of male with anterior margin slightly thickened over median ½, lateral area on each side excavate; labrum of female simple. Elytral apices slightly more widely rounded in males than in females; apical and sutural margin forming a more acute angle in females. + + + + +Etymology. +Named in reference to the long, probe-like aedeagus. + + + + +Distribution. +Currently known from two localities in KwaZulu-Natal Province ( +Fig. 28 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/30/37323055853FCA1B569658A9FC5A08AC.xml b/data/37/32/30/37323055853FCA1B569658A9FC5A08AC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3cfcf12085c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/30/37323055853FCA1B569658A9FC5A08AC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ + + + +Taxonomy of the water beetle genus Limnebius Leach in southern Africa (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) + + + +Author + +Perkins, Philip D. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2015 + +3948 + + +1 + + +41 +59 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3948.1.3 +e44f3143-48ff-4576-9107-0672582bd2f5 +1175-5326 +288366 +0953E397-4543-4D3C-861F-415447C08179 + + + + + + + +Limnebius quantillus + +, +new species + + + + +Figs. 4 +(habitus), 15 (aedeagus), 33 (map) + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +(male): + +South Africa +: Limpopo Province + +, N. Transvaal, Mmabolela estate, shore washing, +22° 40' S +, +28° 15' E +, +6 iii 1973 +, Endrödy-Younga (#13) ( +TMSA +). + +Paratypes +(128): +South Africa +: Limpopo Province + +, Blauberg, Beauly River, from boulder and fine gravel, fast water, elev. +1143 m +, +23° 8' S +, +28° 56' E +, +18 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (173) (1 +BMNH +); Magalakwen River, Platjaan, in sand and gravel along sides, elev. +230 m +, +22° 41' S +, +29° 5' E +, +22 iv 1954 +, J. Balfour-Browne (57 +BMNH +); N. Transvaal, Mmabolela estate, shore washing, +22° 40' S +, +28° 15' E +, +6 iii 1973 +, Endrödy-Younga (#13) (56 +TMSA +); +Mpumalanga Province +, E. Transvaal, Blyderiver Canyon, shore washing, +24° 35' S +, +30° 49' E +, +2 v 1981 +, Endrödy-Younga (#1765) (2 +TMSA +); Kruger Nat. Park, Pafuri, +22° 25' S +, +31° 17' E +, +12 ii 1994 +, Endrödy-Younga (#2998) (1 +TMSA +); Mathlakusapan, shore washing, +22° 37' S +, +31° 22' E +, +4 ii 1997 +, Endrody-Younga (#2991) (2 +TMSA +); + +Zimbabwe + +: Marandellas, M. V. light, +18° 10' S +, +31° 36' E +, +1–28 ii 1962 +, J. S. Weir (3 +BMNH +); Umzingwane River +11 mi +. W of Beit Bridge, +22° 5' S +, +29° 54' E +, +1–30 v 1960 +, J. Weir (5 +BMNH +). + + +Differential diagnosis. +Habitus as illustrated ( +Fig. 4 +); a very small species with oval body form, pronotal disc non-microreticulate, elytra weakly microreticulate. The aedeagus ( +Fig. 15 +) is slender in the proximal ½ and, in ventral view, arcuate; the distal ½ is widened in ventral view and has three patches of setae (as illustrated); the widened area houses the capsule; the apex is produced in a short lobe. + + + + +Description +. Size: +holotype +(length/width, mm): body (length to elytral apices) 0.84/0.41; pronotum 0.22/ 0.42; elytra 0.51/0.42; approximate height, lateral view 0.26. + +Dorsum brown, head darker, except paler laterally on clypeus. Body form slightly drop-shaped, apically moderately acuminate, side margin indented slightly where pronotum joins elytra. Pronotum with disc shining, non-microreticulate, very sparsely finely punctulate, each puncture with very short adpressed seta; area posterior to eye (side view) with few larger punctures, each puncture with adpressed seta, longer than setae on disc. Elytra very weakly microreticulate, almost obsolete, with punctures and setae similar to those on pronotum. Males with first three pro- and mesotarsal segments slightly enlarged, with adhesive setae. Labroclypeal suture bisinuate in frontal view in both sexes. Labrum simple. Elytral apices slightly more widely rounded in males than in females. + + + +Etymology. +Named in reference to the very small body size. + + + + +Distribution. +Currently known from northeastern +South Africa +, plus one moderately disjunct locality in +Zimbabwe +( +Fig. 33 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/3B/37323B43E0BA7F4881D291571A842216.xml b/data/37/32/3B/37323B43E0BA7F4881D291571A842216.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..03039b560af --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/3B/37323B43E0BA7F4881D291571A842216.xml @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Tribe +Rhythirrinini Lacordaire, 1863 + + + + +Rhytirhinides +Lacordaire, 1863: 296 [stem: Rhythirrin-]. Type genus: +Rhythirrinus +Schoenherr +, 1823 [as +Rhytirhinus +, incorrect subsequent spelling of type genus name, not in prevailing usage]. Comment: original vernacular name available (Art. 11.7.2): first used in latinized form by Seidlitz (1875 [Gatt.]: 112, as +Rhytirhinini +[incorrect stem formation]), generally accepted as in Alonso-Zarazaga and Lyal (1999: 141, as +Rhythirrinini +); incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage; First Reviser found ( +Rhythirrinini +Lacordaire, 1863 vs +Rhyparosomini +Lacordaire, 1863 vs +Eupagini +Lacordaire, 1863) is Kuschel (1971: 251). + + +Rhyparosomides +Lacordaire, 1863: 327 [stem: Rhyparosom-]. Type genus: +Rhyparosomus +Schoenherr +, 1842. Comment: original vernacular name available (Art. 11.7.2): first used in latinized form by Stein (1868: 100, as +Rhyparosomini +), generally accepted as in Heyne and Taschenberg (1907: 228, as +Rhyparosomini +). + + +Eupagides +Lacordaire, 1863: 328 [stem: Eupag-]. Type genus: +Eupages +Schoenherr +, 1834. Comment: original vernacular name available (Art. 11.7.2): first used in latinized form by +Peringuey +(1888: 168, as +Eupagidae +), generally accepted as in Schenkling and G. A. K. Marshall (1929: 47, as +Eupagini +). + + +Rhytidorhinides +Wollaston, 1865: 307 [stem: Rhytidorhin-]. Type genus: +Rhytidorhinus +Wollaston, 1864 [preoccupied genus name, not +Rhytidorhinus +Agassiz, 1846 [ +Coleoptera +: +Curculionidae +: +Cyclominae +]; syn. of +Rhythirrinus +Schoenherr +, 1823]. Comment: permanently invalid (Art. 39): based on preoccupied type genus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/5C/37325C7913A6599C90A33B988C3133EA.xml b/data/37/32/5C/37325C7913A6599C90A33B988C3133EA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..30184e4909c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/5C/37325C7913A6599C90A33B988C3133EA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,409 @@ + + + +A revision of the minor species group in the millipede genus Nannaria Chamberlin, 1918 (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Xystodesmidae) + + + +Author + +Means, Jackson C. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7377-0696 +Virginia Tech, Department of Entomology, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA +mjacks4@vt.edu + + + +Author + +Hennen, Derek A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7005-1151 +Virginia Tech, Department of Entomology, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA + + + +Author + +Marek, Paul E. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7048-2514 +Virginia Tech, Department of Entomology, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2021 + +2021-04-13 + + +1030 + + +1 +180 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1030.62544 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1030.62544 +1313-2970-1030-1 +875199397EEE5F7898EA1DB25DA62D25 + + + + +Nannaria fracta +sp. nov. +Figs 80 +, 81 Vernacular name: "The Breaks Interstate Park Twisted-Claw Millipede" + + + +Material examined. + + + +Holotype + +: +United States +- + +Virginia + +• +♂ +; +Dickenson County +, +Haysi +, +Breaks Interstate Park +, +Laurel Branch Trail +at intersection with +Cold Spring Trail +; +37.2897°N +, - +82.2999°W +; elev. + +565 m + +; +28 Sep. 2017 +; hand collected; +J. Means +, +D. Hennen +leg.; VTEC MPE031781. + + + + + +Paratypes + +: +United States +- + +Virginia + +• +♂ +; same collection data as holotype; VTEC, +MPE03179 + +• + +1 ♂ +; same collection data as holotype; VMNH +MPE03756 + +• + +2 ♂♂ +; same collection data as holotype; VTEC +MPE03183 + +, 84; + +1 ♂ +; +Dickenson County +, +Breaks Interstate Park +, in camping area; +37.2936°N +, - +82.3005°W +; +16 Apr. 1983 +; +D. Ogle +leg.; VMNH NAN0156 • SCAU + +- + + +Kentucky + +• +2 ♀♀ +; +Pike County +, +Pikeville +, +Bob Amos Park +, 424 +Bob Amos Dr. +WW +Gearheart Hiking Trail +; +37.4690°N +, - +82.5462°W +; elev. + +359 m + +; +28 Sep. 2017 +; hand collected; +J. Means +, +D. Hennen +leg.; VTEC +MPE03185 + +, 86. + + + +Other material. + + +United States +- + +Virginia + +• +1 ♂ +; +Dickenson County +, +Breaks Interstate Park +; +37.2936°N +, - +82.3005°W +; +7 Sep. 1967 + +; + +Neff, R. +Hoffman +leg.; VMNH NAN0154 • +1 ♂ +; +Russell County +, + +1 mile +NW of Lynn Spring + +; +37.1153°N +, - +81.9411°W +; +20 Apr. 1962 + +; R. Hoffman leg.; VMNH NAN0155 • +1 ♂ +; + +Washington +County +, +Clinch Mountain Wildlife Management Area +, deciduous forest above +Big Tumbling Creek +; +36.9931°N +, - +81.7368°W +; +21 Sep. 2011 + +; + +S. Roble +leg.; VMNH NAN0157. +For +detailed collection data see +Suppl. +material 7 + +. + + + +Diagnosis. + +Adult males of + +Nannaria fracta + +sp. nov. are distinct from other + +Nannaria + +and the nearby + +N. aenigma + +, based on the following combination of characters: + +Gonopods +. + +Gonopodal acropodite acicular, slightly curving medially before tip, not bending abruptly medially at 90° at tip as in + +N. bobmareki + +sp. nov. or gently curving medially as in + +N. aenigma + +. Distal zone short, rounded-not quadrate as in + +N. bobmareki + +sp. nov., or long and serpentine as in + +N. aenigma + +. Acropodite with small, shelf-like medial flange just before tip (Fig. +80C +, red arrow). Prefemur with long, acicular prefemoral process with a pronounced, sharp prefemoral spine (Fig. +80C +, red triangle), not fused with prefemoral process as in + +N. bobmareki + +sp. nov. or lacking as in + +N. aenigma + +. Telopodite basal zone> +1/2 +length of acropodite, not ca. 1/2 length of acropodite as in + +N. bobmareki + +sp. nov. or ca. 1/6 length of acropodite as in + +N. aenigma + +. Telopodite basal zone basal zone with pronounced medial swelling (Fig. +80A +, red circle), not with slight medial swelling as in + +N. bobmareki + +sp. nov., or lacking as in + +N. aenigma + +. +Color +: Tergites with red paranotal spots (Fig. +81 +). Dark brown background. Dorsum of collum smooth with red margin. + + + +Figure 80. + +Nannaria fracta + +sp. nov. paratype ♂ (VMNH, NAN0156) left gonopod +A +anterior view; red circle indicates pronounced basal swelling +B +medial view +C +posterior view; red arrow indicates shelf-like medial flange; red triangle indicates sharp, pronounced prefemoral spine. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. + + + + +Figure 81. + +Nannaria fracta + +sp. nov. paratype ♂ (VTEC, MPE03185) coloration. Scale bar: 4.0 mm. + + + + +Measurements. +♂ holotype (VTEC, MPE03178): BL = 28.9, CW = 3.7, IW = 1.8, ISW = 0.85, B11W = 4.4, B11H = 2.5; ♀ paratype (VTEC, MPE03185): BL = 35.0, CW = 4.5, IW = 2.7, ISW = 1.2, B11W = 5.6, B11H = 4.2. + + +Variation. +No known variation. + + +Distribution. + + +Nannaria fracta + +sp. nov. has a linear distribution extending from eastern Kentucky into western Virginia (Kentucky: Pike County; Virginia: Dickenson, Russell, and Tazewell counties; Suppl. material 7, Fig. +126 +). Distribution area: 98 km2; status: MRE. + + + +Ecology. + +Individuals of + +N. fracta + +sp. nov. have been collected from mesic hardwood forests composed of beech, maple, tuliptree, hemlock, and rhododendron. Specimens taken from Bob Amos Park in Kentucky were found under 1-2 cm of hardpacked, dark soil on the side of a hiking path, while specimens collected from Breaks Interstate Park in Virginia were found in a very moist rhododendron cove along the bank of Laurel Branch Creek, under 1-2 cm of sandy, dark soil. + + + +Etymology. + +This species is named for Breaks Interstate Park, where it was originally collected by R. L. Hoffman in 1962. The specific name is an adjective derived from the Latin +fractura +, meaning break or fracture. + + + +Type locality. + +United States, Virginia, Dickenson County, Haysi, Breaks Interstate Park, Laurel Branch Trail at intersection with Cold Spring Trail, +37.2897°N +, - +82.2999°W +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/32/BA/3732BAF2757B2B2E99F41BCD39E3A9C7.xml b/data/37/32/BA/3732BAF2757B2B2E99F41BCD39E3A9C7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a82c3d10ac8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/32/BA/3732BAF2757B2B2E99F41BCD39E3A9C7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ + + + +Review of Dolichostyrax Aurivillius (Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) in Borneo, with descriptions of three new genera and the first case of (ovo) viviparity in the long-horned beetles + + + +Author + +Gabris, Radim + + + +Author + +Kundrata, Robin + + + +Author + +Trnka, Filip + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +587 + + +49 +75 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.587.7961 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.587.7961 +1313-2970-587-49 +ADB0C5BBCE954ABEA4A1420D9D61380B + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Coleoptera Cerambycidae + + + +Dolichostyrax longipes Aurivillius, 1913 +Figs 13-26 + + + + + +Dolichostyrax +longipes + +Aurivillius, 1913: 239. + + + +Type material. + +Holotype, male, "Batu Lawi / Expedition / Between ulu / Madihil and Lim- / bang, 5-1911 / Gazette Aug. / 1911 // NHRS-JLKB // 000022861 // 5816 /E94 + // HOLOTYPE / +Dolichostyrax +/ +longipes +Aurivillius, 1913 / Labelled by +Gabris +, 2016" (NHRS). + + + +Other material examined. + +Male, "Malaysia, Sabah / Crocker Range / I-12-2004 / Jackson coll // +Dolichostyrax +/ n. sp. 1 / det. J. Sudre 06 // +Dolichostyrax +/ +longipes +Aurivillius, 1913 / +Gabris +det., 2016" (PCDH); male, "BORNEO, Sabah, Malaysia / Kinabalu Park, HQ / 31.1.-2.2.2000, 1500 m / lgt. Jan +Cempirek +// +Dolichostyrax +/ +longipes +Aurivillius, 1913 / +Gabris +det., 2016" (PCJC); female, "Malaysia, Sabah / Sipitang vic / II-26-2005 / local coll // +Dolichostyrax +/ +longipes +Aurivillius, 1913 / +Gabris +det., 2016" (PCDH); female, "Malaysia, Sabah / Ranau / II-12-2004 / Lubin coll // +Dolichostyrax +/ n. sp. 1 / det. J. Sudre 06 // +Dolichostyrax +/ +longipes +Aurivillius, 1913 / +Gabris +det., 2016" (PCDH); female, "Malaysia, Sabah / Tenom / IV-1-2004 / local +coll +// +Dolichostyrax +/ n. sp. / det. J. Sudre // +Dolichostyrax +/ +longipes +Aurivillius, 1913 / +Gabris +det., 2016" (PCDH). + + + +Diagnosis. + +Dolichostyrax longipes +differs by +Dolichostyrax moultoni +by presence of a distinct bulge at apex of scape (Figs 16, 24), tegmen basally with short strut (missing in +Dolichostyrax moultoni +; Fig. 19), and parameres with with dense long setae at whole apical half (vs. setae distributed sparsely at apex of paramere only; Figs 19-20). + + + +Redescription of holotype +(male). BL 9.4 mm, BW 3.5 mm. Body black, antennae and legs slightly lighter. Body densely clothed with very short golden brown pubescence, incorporating fine detritus particles. Head about as wide as anterior margin of pronotum. Antennae 1.3 times longer than body length; scape gradually only slightly widened towards apex, apical part distinctly thicker than the rest of scape, forming a distinct bulge (Fig. 16), densely covered with very short light brown pubescence; the relative ratio of antennomere lengths 2.5: 0.3: 1.0: 1.0: 0.8: 0.7: 0.6: 0.6: 0.6: 0.6: 0.8. +Prothorax as long as wide, laterally with one indistinct tubercle; pronotal disc with a pair of indistinct tubercles near middle and one median at second half; pronotal tubercles punctured. Prosternum in front of coxae 0.6 times shorter than diameter of coxal cavity. Scutellum transverse, more than three times as wide as long. Elytra elongate, 1.4 times as long as wide at widest part, 1.6 times as long as pronotum, widest at middle; each elytron with three rows of tubercles irregular in shape and size (Figs 13, 14), tubercles only slightly elevated from deeply wrinkled elytral surface; sparsely covered with large deep punctures arranged in rows, visible mainly from the lateral view. Legs long, slender; with all tibial spurs distinct; right protarsus and metatarsus with only tarsomere I preserved, right mesotarsus missing; relative lengths of metatarsomeres 1.0: 0.8: 1.2: 1.8. +Male genitalia with tegmen elongate, widest before middle, basally with short strut; parameres elongate, less than half of phallobase length, with dense long setae at apical half (Fig. 19). Penis weakly curved at lateral view, apically truncate; dorsal struts diverged from about 1/2 of penis length. Internal sac long, with paired small medial and distinct flagellar sclerites (Figs 17-18). + + +Variability in males. +BL 9.4-11.8 mm, BW 3.5-4.3 mm. Antennae 1.0-1.3 times longer than body length. Prothorax laterally with one more or less distinct obtuse tooth; pronotal disc slightly to deeply wrinkled; pronotal and elytral tubercles more distinct in other males than holotype. Male from Kinabalu Park (PCJC) large, with pubescence very dense, yellowish brown, and with slightly narrower tegmen. + + +Description of female. +Most characters same as for males. BL 11.7-12.5 mm, BW 4.3-4.9 mm. Antennae 0.9-1.0 times longer than body length. Pronotal and elytral tubercles more or less distinct; tubercles smooth or with individual punctures. Elytra elongate, 1.4-1.6 times as long as wide at widest part, 1.8-2.3 times as long as pronotum. Female genitalia with elongate ovipositor (Fig. 25). Bursa copulatrix small. Spermatheca slender, elongate, curved; sclerotized part of spermathecal duct simply coiled, distinctly shorter than spermatheca itself (Fig. 26). + + +Distribution. +Malaysia: Borneo (Sabah). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8F97DFD29F839.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8F97DFD29F839.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7164ad341a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8F97DFD29F839.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon delicatus +Urhan & Ekiz, 2002 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon delicatus + +Urhan & Ekiz, 2002 +: 228 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +1 female +and +1 male +. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 521/363 µm (in females); 408/288 µm (in males) + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan & Ekiz, 2002 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8F985FABFF910.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8F985FABFF910.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fea7c7363c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8F985FABFF910.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon colligans +Berlese, 1920 + + + + + + + + +Zercon colligans +Berlese, 1920: 190 + +. + +Specimens examined: 17308 females, 6167 males, 3292 deutonymphs and 1170 protonymphs. + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 344/253 µm (in females); 333/232 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Italy +, +Sweden +, +Switzerland +, +France +( +Sellnick, 1958 +), +Turkey +( +Urhan & Ayyıldız, 1994b +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FAADFD9EFA49.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FAADFD9EFA49.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4756ef679cd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FAADFD9EFA49.xml @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon cokelezicus +Urhan, 2009 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon cokelezicus + +Urhan, 2009 +: 322 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: 2401 females, +628 males +, 186 deutonymphs and 55 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 421/302 µm (in females); 336/238 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2009 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FBF5FA7FFAA1.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FBF5FA7FFAA1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..db00011738d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FBF5FA7FFAA1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon carpathicus +Sellnick, 1958 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon carpathicus + +Sellnick, 1958 +: 340 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +97 females +, +97 males +, 81 deutonymphs and 32 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 439/374 µm (in females); 337/279 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Latvia +, +Poland +, +Slovakia +, +Ukraine +, +Romania +(Mašán & Fend'a, 2004), +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2007a +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FC1DFB09FB98.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FC1DFB09FB98.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..90eecc3647c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FC1DFB09FB98.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon cabylus +Athias-Henriot, 1961 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon cabylus + +Athias-Henriot, 1961 +: 403 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +48 females +, +111 males +, 15 deutonymphs and 4 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 410/274 µm (in females); 353/232 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Algeria +( +Athias-Henriot, 1961 +), +Turkey +( +Urhan, 1996 +; +Karaca & Urhan, 2016 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FD25FD92FCF1.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FD25FD92FCF1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c1d5d38ef73 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FD25FD92FCF1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon burdurensis +Urhan, 2001 + + + + + + + + +Zercon burdurensis +Urhan, 2001: 69 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +108 females +, +44 males +, 15 deutonymphs and 5 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 414/249 µm (in females); 318/217 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2001a +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FE4DFD9EFD29.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FE4DFD9EFD29.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..922e3e86f21 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FE4DFD9EFD29.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon beleviensis +Urhan, 2002 + + + + + + + + +Zercon beleviensis +Urhan, 2002: 2134 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +174 females +, +46 males +, 13 deutonymphs and 3 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 414/249 µm (in females); 315/208 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +(Urhan, 2002). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FE95FD53FE00.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FE95FD53FE00.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..41da457b2f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC0F67501A8FE95FD53FE00.xml @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon arslani +Duran, Karaca & Urhan, 2017 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon arslani + +Duran, Karaca & Urhan, 2017 +: 87 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +329 females +, +30 males +, 5 deutonymphs and 1 protonymph. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 504/361 µm (in females); 424/285 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( + +Duran +et al +., 2017b + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8F92DFD81F8C9.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8F92DFD81F8C9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6fe6a75b59f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8F92DFD81F8C9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon alattini +Urhan, 2011 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon alattini + +Urhan, 2011 +: 167 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +39 females +. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 415/273 µm (in females). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2011 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FA75FD34F921.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FA75FD34F921.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f5d88b2d421 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FA75FD34F921.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon afyonensis +Urhan & Duran, 2017 + + + + + + + + +Zercon afyonensis +Urhan & Duran, 2017: 269 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +53 females +and +25 males +. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 425/284 µm (in females); 327/209 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +(Urhan & Duran, 2017). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FAADFD4DFA1A.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FAADFD4DFA1A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d79ed56c453 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FAADFD4DFA1A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + +Genus + +Zercon +C.L. Koch, 1836 + + + + + + + + +Zercon +C.L. Koch, 1836: 15 + +. + + + + +Type +species: + +Zercon triangularis +C.L. Koch, 1836 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FBD1FC9AFB45.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FBD1FC9AFB45.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4afd9cc0a2d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FBD1FC9AFB45.xml @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Prozercon yavuzi +Urhan, 1998 + + + + + + + + + +Prozercon yavuzi + +Urhan, 1998 +: 538 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +2 females +, 1 deutonymph. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 341/230 µm (in females). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 1998 +), +Greece +( +Ujvári, 2008 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FCB1FCC5FBBD.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FCB1FCC5FBBD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9b418e3f145 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FCB1FCC5FBBD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Prozercon tragardhi +(Halbert, 1923) + + + + + + + + +Zercon tragardhi +Halbert, 1923: 375 + +. Specimens examined: +29 females +, +6 males +and 1 deutonymph. Average length and width of idiosoma: 337/233 µm (in females); 294/207 µm (in males). World distribution: +Austria +, Britain, +Ireland +, +Sweden +, +Switzerland +, +Poland +, +Russia +, +Turkey +(Urhan & +Ayyıldız, + + +1992; +Urhan, 1995 +), +Germany +, +Czech Republic +, +Iceland +, +Lithuania +, +Hungary +, +Romania +, +Slovakia +, +Ukraine + + + + +(Mašán & Fend'a, 2004) and +Slovenia +( +Ujvári, 2009a +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FDD9FB19FD5D.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FDD9FB19FD5D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..753aa9ba21a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FDD9FB19FD5D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Prozercon plumosus +Călugăr, 2004 + + + + + + + + + +Prozercon plumosus + +Călugăr, 2004 +: 169 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +3 females +and 1 deutonymph. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 344/245 µm (in females). + +World distribution: +Romania +( +Călugăr, 2004 +) and +Turkey +( + +Urhan +et al +., 2016b + +; + +Duran +et al +., 2017b + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FEE1FC2FFDB5.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FEE1FC2FFDB5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1b8ce73325c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FEE1FC2FFDB5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Prozercon morazae +Ujvári, 2011 + + + + + + + + + +Prozercon morazae + +Ujvári, 2011 +: 24 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +13 females +, +2 males +and 1 protonymph. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 339/226 µm (in females); 290/190 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Greece +( +Ujvári, 2011 +), +Turkey +( + +Urhan +et al +., 2015b + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FF09FC1DFEED.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FF09FC1DFEED.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..148c144c93e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67401A8FF09FC1DFEED.xml @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Prozercon graecus +Ujvári, 2011 + + + + + + + + + +Prozercon graecus + +Ujvári, 2011 +: 16 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +44 females +, +5 males +and 2 deutonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 316/236 µm (in females); 262/185 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Greece +( +Ujvári, 2011 +), +Turkey +( +Karaca & Urhan, 2015c +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67501A8F805FD90FF78.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67501A8F805FD90FF78.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1113886ae0b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC1F67501A8F805FD90FF78.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon anatolicus +Urhan, 2008 + + + + + + + + +Zercon anatolicus +Urhan, 2008: 256 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +33 females +, +56 males +, 27 deutonymphs and 11 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 425/369 µm (in females); 329/273 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2008b +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8F8D5FD90F840.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8F8D5FD90F840.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5a563d0f6ae --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8F8D5FD90F840.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Prozercon erdogani +Urhan, 2010 + + + + + + + + +Prozercon erdogani +Urhan, 2010: 114 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +155 females +, +1 male +, 17 deutonymphs and 10 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 347/228 µm (in females); 284/186 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2010b +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8F9FDFD9EF8B9.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8F9FDFD9EF8B9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6129f37aa24 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8F9FDFD9EF8B9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Prozercon denizliensis +Urhan, 2002 + + + + + + + + +Prozercon denizliensis +Urhan, 2002: 2129 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +81 females +, +35 males +and 4 deutonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 335/220 µm (in females); 277/176 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +(Urhan, 2002). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FA05FB38F990.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FA05FB38F990.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bcb95f28d80 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FA05FB38F990.xml @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Prozercon bulbiferus +Ujvári, 2011 + + + + + + + + + +Prozercon bulbiferus + +Ujvári, 2011 +: 11 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +55 females +and 11 deutonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 315/244 µm (in females). + +World distribution: +Greece +( +Ujvári, 2011 +), +Turkey +(Karaca +et al +., 2014; +Karaca & Urhan, 2015c +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FB2DFD53FAC8.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FB2DFD53FAC8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..df33ad54e07 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FB2DFD53FAC8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Prozercon banazensis +Urhan, +Karaca and Duran, 2015 + + + + + + + + + +Prozercon banazensis +Urhan, + +Karaca and Duran, 2015 +: 1011 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +131 females +, +9 males +and 1 deutonymph. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 321/217 µm (in females); 284/185 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( + +Urhan +et al +., 2015b + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FC75FD92FB21.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FC75FD92FB21.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..69950dd1023 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FC75FD92FB21.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Prozercon balikesirensis +Urhan, 2008 + + + + + + + + +Prozercon balikesirensis +Urhan, 2008: 97 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +20 females +and +1 male +. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 338/235 µm (in females); 275 / 220 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2008c +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FC89FD7CFC3E.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FC89FD7CFC3E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e406a9262d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FC89FD7CFC3E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + +Genus + +Prozercon +Sellnick, 1943 + + + + + + + + +Prozercon +Sellnick, 1943: 211 + +. + + + + +Type +species: + +Zercon fimbriatus +C.L. Koch, 1839 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FDFBFE1FFD6A.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FDFBFE1FFD6A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1750b971494 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC2F67701A8FDFBFE1FFD6A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + +Family +Zerconidae Canestrini, 1891 + + + + +Zerconidae Canestrini, 1891: 722 +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FB65FD92FA31.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FB65FD92FA31.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5a70d9c14b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FB65FD92FA31.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon yusufi +Urhan, 2010 + + + + + + + + +Zercon yusufi +Urhan, 2010: 94 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +74females +, +22 males +, and 4 deutonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 382/298 µm (in females); 316/239 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2010a +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FC69FEF2FB69.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FC69FEF2FB69.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a171c6f2854 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FC69FEF2FB69.xml @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon turcicus +Urhan & Ayyıldız, 1994 + + + + + + + + +Zercon turcicus +Urhan & Ayyıldız, 1994: 337 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +142 females +, +29 males +, and 4 deutonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 404/294 µm (in females); 307/228 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan & Ayyıldız, 1994a +; +Orman, 2001 +; +Karaca & Urhan, 2016 +), +Iran +( + +Karaca +et al +., 2017c + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FCB1FD90FC65.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FCB1FD90FC65.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..17ef273adbe --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FCB1FD90FC65.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon tefenniensis +Urhan, 2010 + + + + + + + + +Zercon tefenniensis +Urhan, 2010: 111 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +1 female +. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 412/277 µm (in females). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2010b +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FDD9FD34FD5D.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FDD9FD34FD5D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2596d5c7fdb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FDD9FD34FD5D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon soguticus +Urhan & Duran, 2017 + + + + + + + + +Zercon soguticus +Urhan & Duran, 2017: 274 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +5 females +and +3 males +. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 393/263 µm (in females); 305/190 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +(Urhan & Duran, 2017). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FEE1FA95FDB5.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FEE1FA95FDB5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aad7abd8138 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FEE1FA95FDB5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon similifoveolatus +Ivan & Călugăr, 2004 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon similifoveolatus + +Ivan & Călugăr, 2004 +: 31 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +3 females +. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 458/347 µm (in females). + +World distribution: +Romania +( +Ivan & Călugăr, 2004 +; +Ujvári & Călugăr, 2010 +), +Turkey +( +Karaca & Urhan, 2016 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FF09FD92FEED.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FF09FD92FEED.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1ad8e9507a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC5F67001A8FF09FD92FEED.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon quadricavum +Urhan, 2001 + + + + + + + + +Zercon quadricavum +Urhan, 2001: 107 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +92 females +, +21 males +and 2 deutonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 431/317 µm (in females); 334/233 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +(Urhan, 2001c). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8F959FC40F839.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8F959FC40F839.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..30a3909baf7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8F959FC40F839.xml @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon plumatopilus +Athias-Henriot, 1961 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon plumatopilus + +Athias-Henriot, 1961 +: 406 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +2 females +and +6 males +. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 435/335 µm (in females); 335/256 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Italy +( +Athias-Henriot, 1961 +), +Yugoslavia +( +Košir, 1974 +), +Russia +( +Petrova, 1977 +), +Turkey +( +Urhan, 1991 +), +Slovenia +, +Cyprus +( +Ujvári, 2009b +), +Albania +( +Ujvári, 2010a +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FA61FC62F935.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FA61FC62F935.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a389550dd96 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FA61FC62F935.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon osmaneliensis +Urhan, 2008 + + + + + + + + +Zercon osmaneliensis +Urhan, 2008: 220 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +11 females +, +13 males +, 7 deutonymphs and 6 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 422/293 µm (in females); 320/226 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2008d +; +Karaca & Urhan, 2016 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FA89FD9EFA6D.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FA89FD9EFA6D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8abb2541fe5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FA89FD9EFA6D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon mehmeturhani +Urhan, 2009 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon mehmeturhani + +Urhan, 2009 +: 323 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +15 females +. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 431/295 µm (in females). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2009 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FB8DFE8AFB45.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FB8DFE8AFB45.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..03de7cfe1e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FB8DFE8AFB45.xml @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon marinae +Ivan & Călugăr, 2004 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon marinae + +Ivan & Călugăr, 2004 +: 43 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +383 females +, +68 males +and 5 deutonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 428/308 µm (in females); 321/212 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Romania +( +Ivan & Călugăr, 2004 +; +Ujvári & Călugăr, 2010 +), +Turkey +( +Duran, 2013 +; +Karaca & Urhan, 2016 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FCB1FE39FC40.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FCB1FE39FC40.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..947a3763dcd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FCB1FE39FC40.xml @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon magdae +Ivan & Călugăr, 2004 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon magdae + +Ivan & Călugăr, 2004 +: 41 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +169 females +, +38 males +and 13 deutonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 418/298 µm (in females); 324/204 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Romania +( +Ivan & Călugăr, 2004 +; +Ujvári & Călugăr, 2010 +), +Turkey +( +Karaca & Urhan, 2014 +; +Karaca & Urhan, 2016 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FDD9FD90FD5D.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FDD9FD90FD5D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..169e4cd24c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FDD9FD90FD5D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon longisetosus +Urhan, 2008 + + + + + + + + +Zercon longisetosus +Urhan, 2008: 218 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +16 females +. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 452/381 µm (in females). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2008d +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FEE1FBB1FDB5.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FEE1FBB1FDB5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..53c6ecdf342 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FEE1FBB1FDB5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon laczii +Ujvári, 2010 + + + + + + + + +Zercon laczii +Ujvári, 2010: 1686 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +818 females +, +180 males +42 deutonymphs and 1 protonymph. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 430/341 µm (in females); 341/235 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Croatia +( +Ujvári, 2010b +), +Turkey +( +Duran, 2013 +; + +Duran +et al +., 2015 + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FF09FD34FEED.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FF09FD34FEED.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..38319c13db2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC6F67301A8FF09FD34FEED.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon karacamehmeti +Urhan & Duran, 2017 + + + + + + + + +Zercon karacamehmeti +Urhan & Duran, 2017: 273 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +34 females +and +21 males +. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 427/274 µm (in females); 350/219 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +(Urhan & Duran, 2017). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8F8DFFAA4F85B.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8F8DFFAA4F85B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..201b6838d95 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8F8DFFAA4F85B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon juvarae +Ivan & Călugăr, 2004 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon juvarae + +Ivan & Călugăr, 2004 +: 28 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +94 females +, +39 males +, 6 deutonymphs and 1 protonymph. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 407/308 µm (in females); 314/218 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Romania +( +Ivan & Călugăr, 2004 +), +Turkey +( + +Urhan +et al +., 2015b + +; +Karaca & Urhan, 2016 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8F9EAFD6DF88E.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8F9EAFD6DF88E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f6a7ee1450c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8F9EAFD6DF88E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon insperatus +Błaszak, 1979 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon insperatus + +Błaszak, 1979 +: 20 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +15 females +, +9 males +, 5 deutonymphs and 4 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 437/322 µm (in females); 319/218 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Błaszak, 1979 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FA32FCF7F9E6.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FA32FCF7F9E6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e688e57634e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FA32FCF7F9E6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon inonuensis +Urhan, 2007 + + + + + + + + +Zercon inonuensis +Urhan, 2007: 117 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +446 females +, +243 males +, 108 deutonymphs and 32 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 456/360 µm (in females); 348/260 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2007b +; +Duran, 2013 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FB5AFD92FADE.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FB5AFD92FADE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6f52608560a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FB5AFD92FADE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon huseyini +Urhan, 2008 + + + + + + + + +Zercon huseyini +Urhan, 2008: 397 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +445 females +, +110 males +96 deutonymphs and 40 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 542/419 µm (in females); 461/336 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2008a +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FC62FB53FB36.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FC62FB53FB36.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..508f5b6ae98 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FC62FB53FB36.xml @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon hispanicus +Sellnick, 1958 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon hispanicus + +Sellnick, 1958 +: 353 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +716 females +, +220 males +, 107 deutonymphs and 21 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 411/325 µm (in females); 325/229 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Spain +( +Sellnick, 1958 +), +Israel +( +Błaszak, 1979 +), +Turkey +( + +Urhan +et al +., 2014 + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FC8AFD55FC6E.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FC8AFD55FC6E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b1c991b23d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FC8AFD55FC6E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon emirdagicus +Urhan, Duran & Karaca, 2016 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon emirdagicus + +Urhan, Duran & Karaca, 2016 +: 168 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +48 females +and +30 males +. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 432/289 µm (in females); 343/215 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( + +Urhan +et al +., 2016a + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FDD2FD55FD46.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FDD2FD55FD46.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..46d67fb2abd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FDD2FD55FD46.xml @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon ekizi +Urhan, Duran & Karaca, 2016 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon ekizi + +Urhan, Duran & Karaca, 2016 +: 165 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +39 females +and +60 males +, 32 deutonymphs and 14 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 470/313 µm (in females); 371/249 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( + +Urhan +et al +., 2016a + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FEE1FD92FDB5.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FEE1FD92FDB5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d20ac3d7e95 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FEE1FD92FDB5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon domanicensis +Urhan, 2010 + + + + + + + + +Zercon domanicensis +Urhan, 2010: 93 + +. + + +Specimens examined: +317 females +, +105 males +, 72 deutonymphs and 19 protonymphs. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 390/314 µm (in females); 321/252 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2010a +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FF09FD81FEED.xml b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FF09FD81FEED.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d3a6294476e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/6E/37336E5DFFC7F67201A8FF09FD81FEED.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +Zerconid mites (Acari, Zerconidae) in Inner Aegean Region, with a new record for the Turkish fauna + + + +Author + +Urhan, Raşit + + + +Author + +Duran, Elif Hilal + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-03-20 + + +4568 + + +2 + + +323 +336 + + + +journal article +28320 +10.11646/zootaxa.4568.2.7 +ba9352da-61cc-4842-84d2-88769e1efcc7 +1175-5326 +2599502 +82DB1512-43D6-4C46-8B4E-F6A8A03C4D0C + + + + + + + +Zercon denizliensis +Urhan, 2011 + + + + + + + + + +Zercon denizliensis + +Urhan, 2011 +: 164 + + +. + + + +Specimens examined: +52 females +, +3 males +and 1 deutonymph. + + + +Average length and width of idiosoma: 469/324 µm (in females); 373/284 µm (in males). + +World distribution: +Turkey +( +Urhan, 2011 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/87/373387E0AA09FF977D37A2A3FC86F94A.xml b/data/37/33/87/373387E0AA09FF977D37A2A3FC86F94A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e397f2d5e2c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/87/373387E0AA09FF977D37A2A3FC86F94A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + +Two new species of Deutella Mayer, 1890 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Pariambidae) collected by the R. V. “ Anton Bruun ” during the International Indian Ocean Expedition 1963 ­ 1964 + + + +Author + +Guerra-García, José M. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2002 + +74 + + +1 +18 + + + +journal article +51434 +10.5281/zenodo.156088 +8f0864a5-87ab-4762-96ec-ff8816955e91 +1175­5326 +156088 + + + + + + +Genus + +Deutella +Mayer, 1890 + +emended + + + + + + +Diagnosis +. Antenna 2 flagellum with 2 articles, swimming setae absent. Mandibular palp 3­articulate; setal formula for distal article +1­x­1 +, +2­x­ +1 or 1 setae; molar present. Outer plate of maxilliped longer than inner lobe. Pereopod 5 with six articles. Male abdomen with pair of appendages and pair of setose lobes. + + +Type +species: + +Deutella californica +Mayer, 1890 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/87/373387E0AA09FF977D37A37BFE48FA22.xml b/data/37/33/87/373387E0AA09FF977D37A37BFE48FA22.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..459b9fb4d62 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/87/373387E0AA09FF977D37A37BFE48FA22.xml @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ + + + +Two new species of Deutella Mayer, 1890 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Pariambidae) collected by the R. V. “ Anton Bruun ” during the International Indian Ocean Expedition 1963 ­ 1964 + + + +Author + +Guerra-García, José M. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2002 + +74 + + +1 +18 + + + +journal article +51434 +10.5281/zenodo.156088 +8f0864a5-87ab-4762-96ec-ff8816955e91 +1175­5326 +156088 + + + + + + +Family + +Pariambidae +Laubitz, 1993 + +emended + + + + + + +Diagnosis +. Antenna 2 flagellum 2­articulate. Mandible molar present, palp 3­articulate; setal formula +1­x­1 +, +2­x­ +1 or one apical setae incisor 5­toothed; left lacinia mobilis 5­ toothed; right lacinia serrate or broadly three­toothed. Lower lip with inner lobes well demarcated. Maxilla 1 with 6 spiniform setae on outer plate. Maxilliped outer plate larger than inner; inner plate truncate with few apical setae. Gnathopod 1 propodus triangular to slender. Gills on pereonite 3 and 4. Pereopod 3 and 4 greatly reduced; pereopod 5 weaker than 6 and 7. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/87/373387E0AA0AFF867D37A656FD9FFE1C.xml b/data/37/33/87/373387E0AA0AFF867D37A656FD9FFE1C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bb0496b84fe --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/87/373387E0AA0AFF867D37A656FD9FFE1C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1327 @@ + + + +Two new species of Deutella Mayer, 1890 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Pariambidae) collected by the R. V. “ Anton Bruun ” during the International Indian Ocean Expedition 1963 ­ 1964 + + + +Author + +Guerra-García, José M. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2002 + +74 + + +1 +18 + + + +journal article +51434 +10.5281/zenodo.156088 +8f0864a5-87ab-4762-96ec-ff8816955e91 +1175­5326 +156088 + + + + + + +Checklist of + +Deutella + +species + + + + + + + +Deutella aspiducha +Gable & Lazo­Wasem, 1987 + + + + + +Deutella aspiducha + +Gable & Lazo­Wasem, 1987 +: 629 + + +­639. + + + + +Deutella californica +Mayer, 1890 + + + + + +Deutella californica + +Mayer, 1890 +: 27 + + +­28; Dougherty & Steinberg, 1954: 169, 171; + +Steinberg & Dougherty, 1957 +: 279 + +­281; + +McCain, 1968 +: 54 + +; + +McCain & Steinberg, 1970 +: 48 + +; + +Laubitz, 1970 +: 16 + +­18. + + + + +Deutella incerta +( +Mayer, 1903 +) + + + + + +Luconacia incerta + +Mayer, 1903 +: 49 + + +­50; + +McCain, 1968 +: 53 + +­54; +McCain & Steinberg, 1970 +. + +Deutella incerta + +; + +Steinberg & Dougherty, 1957 +: 281 + +, 285­286; + +Gable & Lazo­Wasem, 1987 +: 635 + +­636. + + + + +Deutella margaritae +Guerra­García + +, in press (a) + +Deutella margaritae +Guerra­García + +, in press (a) + + + +Deutella mayeri +Stebbing, 1895 + + + + + +Deutella mayeri +Stebbing, 1985: 400 + +­402; + +Mayer, 1903 +: 44 + +­45; + +McCain, 1968 +: 54 + +­57; + +McCain & Steinberg, 1970 +: 48 + +. + + + + +Deutella philippinensis +Guerra­García + +in press (b) + +Deutella philippinensis +Guerra­García + +, in press (b). + + + +Deutella schieckei +Cavedini, 1981 + + + + + +Deutella schieckei + +Cavedini, 1981 +: 515 + + +; + +Krapp­Schickel, 1993 +: 794 + +, 796. + + + + +Deutella vemae +( +McCain & Gray, 1971 +) + + + + + +Deutella vemae + +McCain & Gray, 1971 +: 123 + + +. + + + + +Deutella venenosa +Mayer, 1890 + + + + + +Deutella venenosa + +Mayer, 1890 +: 28 + + +; + +Guerra­García & Thiel, 2001 +: 879 + +. + + + + + +Deutella antonbruuni + +, +sp. nov. + +( +Figs. 1­4 +) + + + + + +Type +material: + +Holotype +: male +USNM +1005297; Allotype: female +USNM +1005298; +Paratypes +: 1 premature female, +3 juveniles +( +USNM +1005299). +Holotype +, allotype and +paratypes +collected with Agassiz Trawl, station 391J, +29º21’S +, +31º35’E +, 57 meters deep, +9.9.1964 +. + + + + +Etymology. +The +type +material of the species was collected on board the vessel “Anton Bruun” during the International Ocean Expedition.The species is named after Anton Bruun, in honor to the noted Danish marine biologist. + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Deutella antonbruuni + +sp. nov. +Lateral view. A, male; B, female. Scale bar: 1 mm. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Description +
+Holotype male +
+Body length +. 4.5 mm. +
+Lateral view +(Fig. 1A). +Bodydorsallysmooth(Fig.3A).Headrounded.Pereonite1
+ + +fused with head, suture present; pereonites 3 and 4 subequal with pleura well­developed ( +Fig. 1 +A, 3A); pereonite 5 the longest; pereonite 7 the shortest. + + +Gills +( +Fig. 1 +A). Elongate, length about 3 times width. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Deutella antonbruuni + +sp. nov. +Male. A, upper lip; B, lower lip; C, maxilliped; D, left mandible; E, right mandible; F, maxilla 1; G, maxilla 2. Scale bars: 0.05 mm. + + + + +Mouthparts +. Upper lip ( +Fig. 2 +A) symmetrically bilobed, smooth apically. Mandibles ( +Fig. 2 +D,E) with 3­articulate palp; distal article of palp with a setal formula 1­2­1; second article provided with 2 simple setae; mandibular molar robust; left mandible ( +Fig. 2 +D) with incisor and lacinia mobilis 5­toothed followed by three plumose setae; incisor and lacinia mobilis of right mandible ( +Fig. 2 +E) 6­toothed, followed by 2 plumose setae; molar flake present, rectangular and setose distally. Lower lip ( +Fig. 2 +B) with well­demarcated inner lobes; inner and outer lobes provided with setulae on apical margin. Maxilla 1 ( +Fig. 2 +F) outer lobe with 6 robust setae; distal article of the palp with 5 robust setae and 4 teeth distally, and 3 setae medially. Maxilla 2 ( +Fig. 2 +G) inner lobe rectangular with 6 setae distally; outer lobe slightly larger than inner lobe, with 6 apical setae. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 2 +C) inner plate rectangular with 4 plumose setae and 1 robust and short seta (like a “tooth”); outer plate about 2.5 times as large as inner plate, with 6 setae; palp 4­articulate, penultimate article of the palp with a distal projection, dactylus without 2 rows of setulae. + + +Antennae +. Antenna 1 ( +Fig. 3 +C) about 2/5 of body length; flagellum 7­articulate. Antenna 2 ( +Fig. 3 +D) with short setae (no swimming setae); basal article of the peduncle with a distal projection; flagellum 2­articulate. + + +Gnathopods +. Gnathopod 1 ( +Fig. 3 +E) basis as long as ischium, merus and carpus combined; propodus length about 1.5 times width, palm with a proximal grasping spine and denticulate margin; dactylus serrate. Gnathopod 2 ( +Fig. 3 +F) inserted on the anterior half of pereonite 2; basis as long as pereonite 2; ischium rectangular; merus triangular; carpus short and rectangular; propodus elongate, about 1.3 times as long as the basis; palm with a proximal elongate projection carrying one grasping spine and two more triangular projections distally; dactylus long, with a few setulae on ventral margin. + + +Pereopods +. Pereopods 3 ( +Fig. 4 +A) and 4 ( +Fig. 4 +B) subequal, 2­articulate, length about 1/5 of gills; basal article rectangular without setae; distal article triangular, a little longer than basal one, with 4 setae on pereopod 3 and 3 setae on pereopod 4. Pereopod 5 missing from this specimen. Pereopod 6 ( +Fig. 4 +C) and 7 ( +Fig. 4 +D) similar in feature but increasing in size respectively, 6­articulate; propodus with a proximal grasping spine. + + +Penes +( +Fig. 4 +E) rounded, situated laterally, with a suture medially. + + +Abdomen +( +Fig. 4 +E) with a pair of appendages, a pair of lateral lobes and a single dorsal lobe. Appendages 1­articulate, acute distally provided with three basal setae, two setae medially and a row of setulae distally. + + +Allotype femaleBody length 3.2 mm. Flagellum of antenna 1 with 6 articles ( +Fig. 1 +B). Propodus of gnathopod 2 wider than in male, length about 2 times width ( +Fig. 3 +G). Oostegites on pereonite 3 setose, on pereonite 4 scarcely setose ( +Fig. 1 +B). Abdomen without appendages ( +Fig. 4 +F); lateral lobes with a single setae. + + +Intraspecific variation. +The setal formula of the mandibular palp is constant in the specimens examined (1­2­1); however the number of teeth in the right lacinia mobilis varies between 4 and 6. The morphology of the maxilliped and maxillae is constant. A comparison of the species to the others in the genus is given in table 1. + + + +FIGURE 3. + +Deutella antonbruuni + +sp. nov. +A, male dorsal view; B, female dorsal view; C, male antenna 1; D, male antenna 2; E, male gnathopod 1; F, male gnathopod 2; G, female gnathopod 2. Scale bars: A,B: 1 mm; C,D: 0.3 mm; E: 0.2 mm; F,G: 0.5 mm. + + + + +FIGURE 4. + +Deutella antonbruuni + +sp. nov. +A­E, male. A, pereopod 3; B, pereopod 4; C, pereopod 6; D, pereopod 7; E, abdomen (ventral view). F, female abdomen (ventral view). Scale bars: A,B: 0.05 mm; C,D: 0.5 mm; E,F: 0.1 mm. + + + + + +Deutella indica + +, +sp. nov. + +( +Figs. 5­8 +) + + + + + +Type +material: + +Holotype +: male +USNM +1005300; Allotype: female +USNM +1005302; +Paratypes +: +4 females +( +USNM +1005303). +Holotype +, allotype and +paratypes +collected with Benthic Trawl, station 456, +29 +º21’S, +31º35’E +, 27­31 meters deep, +17.12.1964 +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +where collected. + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Etymology. +The specific +namerefersto theIndianOcean,theoceanwherethe
+specimens
+Description +. +
Holotype male
+Body length +. 8.5 mm. +
+ + + +FIGURE 5. + +Deutella indica + +sp. nov. +Lateral view. A, male; B, female. Scale bar: 1 mm. + + + + +FIGURE 6. + +Deutella indica + +sp. nov. +Male. A, upper lip; B, lower lip; C, maxilliped; D, right mandible; E, left mandible; F, maxilla 1; G, maxilla 2. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. + + + +Lateral view +( +Fig. 5 +A). Head rounded. Pereonite 1 fused with head, suture present; pereonite 2 with a pair of lateral projections proximally and another pair situated medially ( +Fig. 5 +A, 7A); pereonites 3 and 4 subequal in size, pleura not well­developed; pereonites 3, 4 and 5 subequal in length; pereonite 7 the shortest. + + + + +FIGURE 7. + +Deutella indica + +sp. nov. +A, male dorsal view; B, female dorsal view; C, male antenna 1; D, male antenna 2; E, male gnathopod 1; F, male gnathopod 2; G, female gnathopod 2. Scale bars: A,B: 1 mm; C,D: 0.5 mm; E: 0.3 mm; F,G: 0.5 mm. + + + + +Gills +( +Fig. 5 +A). Elongate, length about 4 times width. + + +Mouthparts +. Upper lip ( +Fig. 6 +A) symmetrically bilobed, smooth apically. Mandibles ( +Fig. 6 +D,E) with 3­articulate palp; second article with 5 simple setae in the left mandible ( +Fig. 6 +E) and +6 in +the right mandible ( +Fig. 6 +D); distal article of palp with a setal formula 2­ 7­1 and a medial single seta;; mandibular molar robust; left mandible incisor and lacinia mobilis 5­toothed followed by 3 plumose setae; incisor of right mandible 6­toothed, lacinia mobilis serrate, followed by 2 plumose setae; molar flake present, rectangular and setose distally. Lower lip ( +Fig. 6 +B) with well­demarcated inner lobes; inner and outer lobes with apical setulae. Maxilla 1 ( +Fig. 6 +F) outer lobe with 6 robust setae; distal article of the palp with 5 robust setae and 3 teeth distally, and 3 setae medially. Maxilla 2 ( +Fig. 6 +G) inner lobe rectangular, carrying 9 setae distally; outer lobe, about 1.5 times larger than inner lobe, with ten apical setae. Maxilliped ( +Fig. 6 +C) inner plate rectangular with 4 plumose setae and one robust, short setae (like a “tooth”); outer plate about 2.5 times as large as inner plate, with 6 setae; palp 4­articulate, setose; penultimate article of the palp with a distal acute projection; dactylus without two rows of setulae. + + +Antennae +. Antenna 1 ( +Fig. 7 +C) about 2/5 of body length; flagellum with 13 articles. Antenna 2 ( +Fig. 7 +D) with short setae (no swimming setae); basal article of the peduncle with a distal projection; flagellum 2­articulate. + + +Gnathopods +. Gnathopod 1 ( +Fig. 7 +E) basis as long as ischium, merus and carpus combined; propodus length about 1.7 times width, palm with a proximal grasping spine and denticulate margin; dactylus strongly serrate. Gnathopod 2 ( +Fig. 7 +F) inserted on the anterior half of pereonite 2; coxa well­developed and provided with an acute projection; basis as long as pereonite 2; ischium rectangular; merus triangular; carpus short and triangular; propodus elongate, as long as the basis; palm with a proximal projection elongate carrying one grasping spine and 2 triangular projections, medially and distally respectively; dactylus long, with a few setulae on ventral margin. + + +Pereopods +. Pereopods 3 ( +Fig. 8 +A) and 4 ( +Fig. 8 +B) subequal, 1­articulate, with 3 setae. Pereopod 5 ( +Fig. 8 +C) 6­articulate; propodus without grasping spines. Pereopod 6 ( +Fig. 8 +D) and 7 ( +Fig. 8 +E) similar in feature but increasing in size respectively, 6­articulate; propodus with a proximal grasping spine. + + +Penes ( +Fig. 8 +F) rounded, situated laterally, with a suture medially.. + + +Abdomen ( +Fig. 8 +F) with a pair of appendages, a pair of lateral lobes and a single dorsal lobe. Appendages 2­articulate; basal article short with three setae; distal article elongate with small setulae and one single setae distally. + +Allotype female + +Body length 6.4 mm. Pereonite 2 with the proximal projections less developed than in male and the medial projections lacking ( +Fig. 5 +B, 7B). Propodus of gnathopod 2 wider than in male ( +Fig. 7 +G). Oostegites on pereonite 3 and 4 setose ( +Fig. 5 +B). Abdomen without appendages ( +Fig. 8 +G); lateral lobes with a single seta. + + +Intraspecific variation. +The structure and number of setae on the maxilliped and the maxillae are very constant in all specimens examined. However the setal formula of the mandibular palp is +1­x­ +2 with x ranging from 4 to 7. The number of articles of the antenna 2 flagellum in females varies between 9 and 11. + + + +FIGURE 8. + +Deutella indica + +sp. nov. +A­F, male. A, pereopod 3; B, pereopod 4; C, pereopod 5; D, pereopod 6; E, pereopod 7; F, abdomen (ventral view). G, female abdomen (ventral view). Scale bars: A,B: 0.05 mm; C­E: 0.5 mm; F,G: 0.1 mm. + + + + +TABLE 1. +Comparison among the species of + +Deutella + +. + + + + +D. antonbruuni + + +n.sp. + + +D. indica + + +n. sp. + + +D. aspiducha +D. californica + + +Body length (mm) Male 4,5 5,5 4,8 5,5 +Female 3,2 6,4 4,2 3,8 +Dorsal projections Absent Absent Present Present + +Lateral projections on pereonite +2 male +Abse nt 2 pairs 1 pair Absent + + +Antenna 1 flagellar articles Male +7 11 6­7 +12 + + +Female +6 9­11 +4 12 + +Antenna 2 flagellar articles 2 2 2 2 +Mandibles Knobs on distal article of palp Absent Asent Present Absent + +Setal formula +1­x­ +1, x=2 +2­x­ +1, x=4­7 +1­x­ +1, x=5 +1­x­ +1, x=3­5 + +Left incisor 5­toothed 5­toothed 6­toothed 5­toothed +Right incisor 6­toothed 6­toothed 6­toothed 5­toothed +Left lacinia mobilis 5­toothed 5­toothed Serrate 5­toothed +Rigth lacinia mobilis 6­toothed Serrate Serrate 5­toothed +Molar flake Present Present Absent Absent +Maxilla 1 Distal spines of outer lobe 6 6 5 6 +Distal spines of palp 5 5 3 3 +Maxilla 2 Setae of outer lobe 6 9 4 4 + +Setae of inner lobe +6 10 3 +5 + +Maxilliped Inner plate 1 “tooth” 1 “tooth” no “tooth” no “tooth” + +4 setae 4 setae 2 setae 3 setae + +Deutella antonbruuni + +and + +D. indica + +are close to + +D. mayeri + +and + +D. margaritae + +by lacking dorsal projections. However, differences in the lateral projections, the seta formula, the distal projection on the penultimate article of the mandibular palp, and the morphology of pereopods 3 and 4 revealed that the specimens studied here are new species. A detailed comparison of the avobe morphological characters among the others known species of + +Deutella + +are included in table 1. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Outer plate6 setae6 setae4­5 setae5­6 setae
Distal projection on penultimate article of palpPresentPresentAbsentPresent
Gnathopod 1 grasping spines1121
Proximal projection of the propodus of gnathopod 2 maleTriangularTriangularRectangularRectangular
Pereopods 3 and 42­articulate1­articulate2­articulate2­articulate
Pereopod 5­NormalReducedNormal
Male abdominal appendages1­articulate2­articulate1­articulate1­articulate
Discussion
+ + +TABLE 1 (CONTINUED) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ +D. incerta + + + +D. margaritae + + + +D. mayeri + + + +D. philippinensis + + + +D. schieckei + + + +D. vemae + + + +D. venenosa + +
97,846,14,513,55,7
86,234,63,5124,8
PresentAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsentPresentPresent
1 pair1 pair1 pair1 pair1 pairAbsent1 pair
10­11146­76­76­81111
10106­76­7697
2222222
PresentPresentAbsentPresentAbsentAbsentAbsent
1­x­1, x=3­101­x­1, x=91 or 2 setae1­x­1, x=12 setae1­x­1, x=111­x­1, x=4­5
5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed
5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed
5­toothed4­toothed5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed5­toothed
SerrateSerrateSerrateSerrate­4­toothedSerrateSerrateSerrate
AbsentPresentAbsentPresentAbsentAbsentPresent
5­654­57566
443­44445
5­735­68454
4­544­56455
no “tooth”1 “tooth”no “tooth”1 “tooth”1 “tooth”no “tooth”1 “tooth”
4 setae4 setae3­4 setae4 setae3­4 setae3 setae3 setae
5­7 setae4­5 setae12 setae6 setae7 setae4­5 setae5 setae
AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsentPresentAbsentPresent
2211121
RectangularRectangularTriangularTriangularRectangularRectangularRectangular
2­articulate2­articulate2­articulate1­articulate2­articulate2­articulate1 or 2­articulate
NormalNormalNormal­NormalNormalNormal
1­articulate2­articulate1­articulate2­articulate1­articulate1­articulate1­articulate
+ + +The setal formula of the mandibular palp in + +D. indica + +is unique within the genus + +Deutella + +and the family + +Pariambidae +( +Laubitz, 1993 +) + +. In general, the setal formula of the third article of the mandibular palp is +1­x­ +1 in + +Deutella + +and related genera, or 1­x­y­ +1 in + +Protella + +and related genera ( +Mayer, 1903 +; +McCain, 1968 +; +Arimoto, 1976 +; +Laubitz, 1993 +). This formula indicates the presence of one long seta at each end and one row (x) or two rows (x­y)of shorter setae. The seta formula in + +D. indica + +has 2 long setae near proximal end followed by 4­7 short setae and one long seta. Thus, the seta formula for the present species is assigned as 2 (long setae near proximal end)­x (number of short setae)­1(long seta near apical end). The diagnosis of the genus + +Deutella + +and family +Pariambidae +have been modified in this study to include this seta formula. The formula +2­x­ +1 has recently been reported in a new species of + +Paraprotella + +collected from Phuket Island, +Thailand +(Takeuchi & Guerra­García, in press). + + +Laubitz (1993) +transferred the genus + +Deutella + +from the family + +Protellidae +McCain, 1970 + +to the new family + +Pariambidae +Laubitz, 1993 + +, mainly on the basis of lacking a molar flake, a different seta formula than 1­x­y­1 and six instead of seven spiniform setae on the outer plate of the maxilla 1. Although the genus + +Deutella + +is considered here to occur within the family +Pariambidae +, the two new species described here, + +D. antonbruuni + +and + +D. indica + +, both with a molar flake, do not support Laubitz’s classification. Guerra­García (in press (a)) discussed the validity of the family +Pariambidae + + +* * + +D. antonbruuni + +n.sp. + +D. incerta +D. schieckei +D. indica + +n.sp. + +D. margaritae +D. vemae +D. aspiducha +D. mayeri +D. venenosa +D. californica +D. philippinensis + + + + +FIGURE 9 +. Biogeographical distribution of the + +Deutella + +species. + + + + +Deutella antonbruuni + +and + +D. indica + +represent the first record of the genus + +Deutella + +for the Indian Ocean. + +Deutella aspiducha + +, + +D. incerta + +, + +D. margaritae + +and + +D. mayeri + +are distributed in the tropical Western Atlantic; + +D. californica + +has been recorded along the North Pacific coast of North +America +; + +D. venenosa + +occurs from Central +Chile +, + +D. vemae + +is known from Subantarctic waters of South +America +, + +D. schieckei + +was described from the Mediterranean and + +D. philippinensis + +from the Western Pacific ( +Fig. 9 +). The absence of records for Indian Ocean before this study were probably due to the lack of caprellid studies in this region ( +McCain & Steinberg, 1970 +). In fact, the two new species, + +D. antonbruuni + +and + +D. indica + +, could have a larger distribution area in the Indian Ocean. According to the IUCN Red List Categories (IUCN, 2001), both species, can be considered as Data Deficient (DD). A taxon is Data Deficient when there is inadequate information to make a direct, or indirect, assessment of its risk of extinction based on its distribution and/or population status. Further studies dealing with the Caprellidea from the Indian Ocean should be addressed in the near future. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/87/373387E2FFD48648FF78FF52FA7BFD5F.xml b/data/37/33/87/373387E2FFD48648FF78FF52FA7BFD5F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c5d84772036 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/87/373387E2FFD48648FF78FF52FA7BFD5F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,194 @@ + + + +On the identities of Caecilia degenerata Dunn, 1942 and of C. corpulenta Taylor 1968 (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) with descriptions of three new species of Caecilia Linnaeus, 1758 from the Cordillera Oriental of Colombia + + + +Author + +Fernández-Roldán, Juan David +0000-0003-2011-3881 +fernandezroldanjd@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Lynch, John D. + + + +Author + +Medina-Rangel, Guido Fabian +Grupo Biodiversidad y Conservación, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad & Grupo de Morfología y Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D. C., Colombia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2023 + +2023-01-05 + + +5227 + + +2 + + +205 +228 + + + +journal article +276838 +10.11646/zootaxa.5227.2.3 +cf303596-4863-4fcc-8cd6-d92d317cfd23 +1175-5326 +7518604 +7781A542-97A6-4E90-A2FE-20C0650B29B0 + + + + + + +Key to the + +Caecilia + +of the Cordillera Oriental of +Colombia + + + + + + + +1. With secondary grooves................................................................................ 2 + + +1’. Without secondary grooves............................................................................. 4 + + + + + +2. 111–132 primary grooves, 0–32 secondaries, a very truncated head in dorsal and ventral view................. + +C +. +guntheri + + + + +2’. More than 139 primary grooves, and more than 13 secondary grooves............................................ 3 + + + + + +3. 139–163 primary grooves, 21–38 secondaries, a rounded head in dorsal and ventral view, some individuals with an anterior set of secondary grooves past the nuchal collars.......................................... + +C +. +epicrionopsoides + + +sp. nov. + + + + + +3’. 169–276 primary grooves, 13–58 secondaries, a bullet-shaped head in dorsal and ventral view, and a slender and elongated body....................................................................................... + +C +. +thompsoni + + + + + + + +4. 96–106 primary grooves, straight dentary teeth, and a small terminal shield......................... + +C +. +pulchraserrana + + + + +4’. More than 120 primary grooves, straight or recurved dentary teeth, and a small or large terminal shield................. 5 + + + + + +5. With subdermal scales within the connective tissue of the skin.................................. + +C +. +atelolepis + + +sp. nov. + + + + +5’. Without subdermal scales within the connective tissue of the skin.................................................6 + + + + + +6. Straight dentary teeth, large terminal shield, and 120–136 primary grooves............................... + +C. orientalis + + + + +6’. Recurved dentary teeth................................................................................. 7 + + + + + +7. With large, thick, very recurved dentary teeth, a large terminal shield, and 122–132 primary grooves. + +C +. +macrodonta + + +sp. nov. + + + + + +7’. With thin, recurved dentary teeth, a small terminal shield, and 133–136 primary grooves................... + +C +. +denegerata + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/33/DD/3733DD7FAA9C63199538BDDC3402E64F.xml b/data/37/33/DD/3733DD7FAA9C63199538BDDC3402E64F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9be43497b17 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/33/DD/3733DD7FAA9C63199538BDDC3402E64F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +Review of the Capitellidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) from the Eastern Tropical Pacific region, with notes on selected species + + + +Author + +Garcia-Garza, Maria Elena + + + +Author + +Leon-Gonzalez, Jesus Angel De + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +151 + + +17 +52 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.151.1964 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.151.1964 +1313-2970-151-17 + + + + +Genus +Amastigos Piltz, 1977 + + + + +Amastigos +Piltz, 1977: 57, figs 1-2. + + + +Type species. + +Amastigos acutus +Piltz, 1977 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/34/CF/3734CF7118313C7278EF4E9C3878DD1E.xml b/data/37/34/CF/3734CF7118313C7278EF4E9C3878DD1E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1d2f98d9c53 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/34/CF/3734CF7118313C7278EF4E9C3878DD1E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Brassicaceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +480 +566 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Cardamine pentaphyllos +(L.) Crantz + + + + + +Artbeschreibung: +Staengel +30-50 cm +hoch, unverzweigt, kantig, unten dicht behaart. Kriechende Grundachse mit fleischigen, zahnartigen Blattschuppen. +Grundstaendige +Blaetter +meist fehlend. +Staengelblaetter +meist 3, +wechselstaendig +, + +mit 5 +radiaer +angeordneten, lanzettlichen, bis +ueber +10 cm +langen, +gezaehnten +Teilblaettern +. +Kronblaetter +hellviolett, +15-20 mm +lang + +. +Fruechte +4-7 cm +lang und +2,5-5 mm +dick, Stiel etwa halb so lang wie die Frucht. + + + + +Bluetezeit +: 4-5 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz: +Buchenmischwaelder +in schattiger Lage / kollin-montan(-subalpin) / J, M, AN, selten AS + + + + +Verbreitung global: Mittel- und +suedwesteuropaeisch + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl L--Salzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl T--
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +--
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: + +Fingerblaettrige +Zahnwurz + +Nom +francais +: + +Dentaire +a +cinq folioles + +Nome italiano: +Dentaria a cinque foglie + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/34/EA/3734EAE6A3545215B53AD58F535B4DF1.xml b/data/37/34/EA/3734EAE6A3545215B53AD58F535B4DF1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..12de281df58 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/34/EA/3734EAE6A3545215B53AD58F535B4DF1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,264 @@ + + + +Megafauna of the German exploration licence area for seafloor massive sulphides along the Central and South East Indian Ridge (Indian Ocean) + + + +Author + +Gerdes, Klaas +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0164-8311 +INES - Integrated Environmental Solutions, Wilhelmshaven, Germany +kgerdes@ines-solutions.eu + + + +Author + +Kihara, Terue Cristina +INES - Integrated Environmental Solutions, Wilhelmshaven, Germany + + + +Author + +Martinez Arbizu, Pedro +Senckenberg am Meer, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research, Wilhelmshaven, Germany + + + +Author + +Kuhn, Thomas +Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Hannover, Germany + + + +Author + +Schwarz-Schampera, Ulrich +International Seabed Authority, Kingston, Jamaica + + + +Author + +Mah, Christopher L +Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States of America + + + +Author + +Norenburg, Jon L +Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States of America + + + +Author + +Linley, Thomas D +Newcastle University, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle, United Kingdom + + + +Author + +Shalaeva, Kate +Natural History Museum London, London, United Kingdom + + + +Author + +Macpherson, Enrique +Centro de Estudios Avanzados de Blanes (CEAB), Blanes, Girona, Spain + + + +Author + +Gordon, Dennis +NIWA, Newmarket, Auckland, New Zealand + + + +Author + +Stoehr, Sabine +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2586-7239 +Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden + + + +Author + +Messing, Charles G +Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, Dania Beach, United States of America + + + +Author + +Bober, Simon +University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany + + + +Author + +Guggolz, Theresa +University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany + + + +Author + +Christodoulou, Magdalini +Senckenberg am Meer, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research, Wilhelmshaven, Germany + + + +Author + +Gebruk, Andrey +P. P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Moscow, Russia + + + +Author + +Kremenetskaia, Antonina +P. P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Moscow, Russia + + + +Author + +Kroh, Andreas +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8566-8848 +Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna, Austria + + + +Author + +Sanamyan, Karen +Far-Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia + + + +Author + +Bolstad, Kathrin +Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand + + + +Author + +Hoffman, Leon +Senckenberg am Meer, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research, Wilhelmshaven, Germany + + + +Author + +Gooday, Andrew J +National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, Southampton, United Kingdom + + + +Author + +Molodtsova, Tina +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-6952 +P. P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Moscow, Russia + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2021 + +2021-09-28 + + +9 + + +69955 +69955 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e69955 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e69955 +1314-2828-9-e69955 +3627CBB8E2915973B82E80F917CD11AD + + + + +Coryphaenoides gen. inc. (DZMB_2021_0013) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: + +Other material +. +Occurrence: +recordedBy: +ROPOS.COM +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +Adult +; behavior: Swimming; occurrenceStatus: present; preparations: Imaged only; associatedMedia: R2092_00403.jpg; +Taxon: +taxonConceptID: Coryphaenoides gen. inc. (DZMB_2021_0013); kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Chordata; class: Actinopterygii; order: Gadiformes; family: Macrouridae; genus: Coryphaenoides; taxonRank: Genus; scientificNameAuthorship: Gunnerus, 1765; +Location: +waterBody: Indian Ocean; stateProvince: +South East Indian Ridge +; locality: +Vent site 6 +; verbatimLocality: Cluster 12; maximumDepthInMeters: 2462; locationRemarks: +RV Pelagia Cruise +INDEX2018 Leg 2; geodeticDatum: WGS84; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 25; +Identification: +identifiedBy: + +Thomas D. Linley + +; identificationRemarks: Identified only from imagery; identificationQualifier: gen. inc.; +Event: +eventDate: + +2018-11-20 + +; eventTime: 7:23:30 am; year: 2018; fieldNumber: INDEX2018-57ROPOS; fieldNotes: 1.8°C, 34.7 ppt; +Record Level: +language: en; institutionCode: DZMB; datasetName: INDEX; basisOfRecord: Human Observation + + + + + +Notes + +Fig. +46 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/5E/37355E8568A4D5B54C995220CBBCC11F.xml b/data/37/35/5E/37355E8568A4D5B54C995220CBBCC11F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..683f12f3293 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/5E/37355E8568A4D5B54C995220CBBCC11F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ + + + +New records of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Iran. + + + +Author + +Paknia, O. + + + +Author + +Radchenko, A. + + + +Author + +Pfeiffer, M. + +text + + +Asian Myrmecology + + +2010 + +3 + + +29 +38 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/23045/23045.pdf + +journal article +23045 + + + + +Tetramorium schneideri Emery, 1898 + + + + + +Material: 21?, +Alborz Range forest steppe, Golestan National Park +( +37°20'36''N +, +56°14'57''E +), 1226 m asl, + +28.V2007 + +, leg. +Omid Paknia + +. + + + + +Remarks: +T. schneideri +was recorded in the plains and foothills of Central Asia and Afghanistan (Dlussky et al. 1990; Radchenko 1992b). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0005D7FFF4694F170FAF828.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0005D7FFF4694F170FAF828.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..069da5faae7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0005D7FFF4694F170FAF828.xml @@ -0,0 +1,2051 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Melittomma pervagum +( +Olliff, 1889 +) + + + + +(Figs. 13–14, 18, 32, 35) + + + + + + +Hylecoetus pervagus +Olliff, 1889: 85 + + +. + + + + + + +Hylecoetus vigilans +Lea, 1912: 467 + + +, pl. 17, fig. 8. +Syn. nov. + + + + + +Diagnosis +. This species may be distinguished from other species known to this author by several features which also distinguish it from all other Australian melittommatines. The normal + +Melittomma + +pronotum is widest at or behind middle and has an evenly rounded anterior edge without anterior angles; in this respect it is similar to those of all known + +Alcestoma + +and + +Australymexylon + +. The pronotum of + +M. pervagum + +, however, is widest near the anterior edge with obtuse but distinct anterior angles between the lateral and anterior margins. The only species which may have a similar pronotum, based on the figure in +Villiers (1969 +, fig. 15) is + +Melittomma africanum +(Thomson) + +. Other features, such as strongly divergent pronotosternal sutures, highly reduced prosternal process, postcoxal (hypomeral) processes and mesoventrital process (all virtually absent), and mesocoxal cavities partly closed laterally by both mesanepisternum and mesepimeron, all differ from other melittommatines examined. On the other hand, this species possesses the appendiculate paratergites and aedeagal +type +found in other + +Melittomma + +species, the male abdominal apices of which have been examined or illustrated ( +Villiers 1969 +; +Wheeler 1986 +; +Fonseca & Vieira 2000 +; Orozco & Dias 2018). + + + + +Redescription. +Total length: males, +5.20–14.70 mm +(7.90 ± 2.10, n = 65), female 8.00–30.00 (18.90 ± 5.80, n = 78); body 4.13–6.12 (5.04) times as long as combined elytral width. Colour of head black; pronotum reddishbrown to dark brown; elytra yellowish-brown to chestnut brown or dark brown, undersurfaces and legs yellow to yellowish-brown; antennae usually reddish-brown; mandibles red to black, maxillar and labium yellow to yellowish-brown, but male palp organ black. Upper surfaces densely, more or less evenly clothed with short suberect to decumbent, fine, yellow hairs; undersurfaces and legs with similar hairs. Head slightly longer than wide, abruptly constricted to form neck, which is 0.75 times as wide as head behind eyes. Eyes very large, contiguous in male and very narrowly separated in female, protruding and finely facetted, with short, fine interfacetal hairs. Temples very short and abrupt, barely visible from above. Antennal insertions concealed by frontal ridges which extend slightly into eye emargination. Frontoclypeal suture distinct. Clypeus 0.25 times as long as wide with truncate apex. Labrum 0.72 times as wide as clypeus, 0.75 times as long as wide, with apex subangulate and surface densely setose. Antennae in both sexes about as long as head width including eyes. Ratio of antennomere lengths: male: 1.80: 1.20: 2.20: 1.30: 1.20: 1.10: 1.10: 1.00: 1.20: 1.20: 3.40; female: 1.60: 1.00: 1.90: 1.30: 1.20:1.20: 1.20: 1.20: 1.20: 1.20: 2.80. Antennomere length/width ratios: male: 1.50, 1.09, 2.00, 1.08, 1.09, 1.00, 1.00, 0.91, 1.50, 1.50, 4.25; female: 1.45, 0.83, 1.27, 0.68, 0.67, 0.67, 0.67, 0.75, 0.80, 0.92, 2.64. The intermediate antennomeres in the male are about as long as wide and more or less keg shaped, while those in the female are definitely shorter than wide and subserrate; terminal antenomere in both sexes subacute at apex. Mandible about as long as wide; outer edge slightly, evenly curved, apex bidentate; incisor edge simple or with indistinct tooth; mola and prostheca absent. Galea 2.08 times as long as wide, widest near broadly rounded apex, densely setose; lacinia slightly shorter than and 0.25 times as wide as galea, subacute apically; first maxillary palpomere in male 0.9 times as long as wide, 0.75 times as long as second, which is 0.67 times as long as wide; third palpomere about 1.8 times as long as second, 0.73 times as long as wide, more or less globular and deeply excavate and fourth palpomere 1.80 times as long as third, 5.0 times as long as wide and narrowly rounded apically; palp organ relatively complex, with at about 8 primary lobes and numerous secondary lobes. Apical maxillary palpomere in female about 2.50 times as long as wide, barely wider at middle, with obliquely truncate apex. Mentum 0.44 times as long as wide, widest at truncate apex; ligula longer than mentum, widest at apex, which is deeply emarginate forming two lobes; labial palps separated by slightly less than the basal width of one; apical palpomere 2.50 time as long as wide, widest at about middle with narrowly rounded apex. Submentum not separated from gula; gular sutures subparallel. Cervical sclerites each consisting of two complexly curved plates, about equal in length, the anterior one with a small setose patch. Pronotum 0.95–1.15 (1.06) times as long as wide, widest at anterior third; sides straight and diverging from near base to anterior third, where a pair of weak, obtuse anterior angles separate them from the strongly curved anterior edge; posterior angles slightly, posterolaterally produced and subacute with finely notched apex; posterior edge weakly bisinuate, with narrow bead and transverse, submarginal groove; lateral margins very narrow and not extending onto anterior edge; disc moderately convex but with distinctly elevated area posteromesally; finely, densely punctate, with punctures usually separated by less than half a puncture diameter and enclosing one relatively short, fine, yellowish seta plus a small pore. Prosternum about as long as mid length of procoxal cavity, slightly, evenly convex, with straight, notosternal sutures strongly diverging anteriorly and extending to lateral edge just beyond anterior angles. Prosternal process very short, broad and apically truncate, not extending between coxae. Procoxal cavities large and broadly open externally and internally, with small, weak notch at base of notosternal suture; postcoxal (hypomeral) process very short, broad and rounded; protrochantin reduced but externally visible, more or less trapezoidal; endopleuron short, broadly expanded at apex. Scutellar shield slightly longer than wide, widest at base with sides narrowing to truncate apex, neither elevated nor separated from scutum, which lacks median endocarina. Elytra 3.23–5.13 (4.08) times as long as wide and 3.33–5.31 (5.04) times as long as pronotum, with sides more or less parallel, outer angles broadly rounded and apices independently narrowly rounded but narrowly separated; humeri weakly developed; disc with four very weak, longitudinal costae; punctation fine, dense and confused, each puncture bearing a moderately long, fine, inclined seta. Mesoventrite subtriangular, 0.75 times as long as wide, widest at posterior end and gradually narrowed to anterior end which is very narrow and truncate, separating the narrow mesanepisternal coxal rests; anterior portion of mesoventrite simple without longitudinal or transverse ridges. Posterior edge of mesoventrite forming a very short, apically truncate intercoxal process. Mesocoxal cavities large, weakly impressed and contiguous, broadly closed laterally by both mesanepisternum and mesepimeron; mesotrochantin visible, small, ovate. Metaventrite 1.40 times as long as wide, strongly convex, longest anterolaterally, with discrimen very weakly indicated but extending anteriorly almost as far as posterior edges of coxal cavities; posteror edge of metaventrite undulate on either side of small projection cleft at apex. Metanepisternum 4.00 times as long as wide, widest at anterior end and gradually narrowed to truncate apex; metepimeron concealed. Metendosternite with very long stalk, paired, elongate-oval laminae about twice as long as wide, slender lateral arms extending dorsally and a very short anterior process more or less continuous with laminae and bearing a pair of relatively widely separated anterior tendons. Hind wing about 2.75 times long as wide; apical field 0.22 times as long as wing length, with anterior oblique and posterior oblique linear sclerites meeting at base of field and extending to wing membrane. Radial cell about 0.04 times wing length, 2,0 times as long as wide, with straight base; cross-vein r3 absent, r4 long, oblique and slightly curved; radio-medial loop forming a 45° angle with apex of MP +1+2 +and basal portion of RP extending to basal fourth. MP +1+2 +strongly developed, with medial spur straight, extending to wing margin. Medial field with four veins extending to wing margin: MP +3+4 +undivided, without basal crossvein or stub; wedge cell 6.3 times as long as wide, apically obliquely truncate, giving rise to CuA +1+2 +, which is moderately long, oblique and forked to form short CuA +1 +meeting MP +3+4 +and a long CuA +2 +; AA +4 +very close to CuP + AA +3 +. Anal embayment absent; anal lobe large with two veins (AP +1+2 +, AP +3+4 +). Procoxa 3.18 times as long as wide, widest near base and slightly narrowed to apex, strongly projecting. Mesocoxa 2.08 times as long as wide, widest near base and narrowed apically, projecting posteriorly. Metacoxa 0.60 times as long as wide, strongly oblique and projecting, with distinct femoral grooves. Trochanters all small and subtiangular; trochanterofemoral joints strongly oblique so that femur just meets coxa. Profemur 3.07 times as long as wide; protibia 5.6 times as long as wide; protarsus about as long as tibia, with segment length ratio 4.8: 2.4: 1.2: 1.0: 2.8. Mesofemur 3.62 times as long as wide, widest at middle, with slight tibial groove; mesotibia 8.2 times as long as wide, more or less parallel sided; mesotarsus about 1.6 times as long as tibia, with segment length ratio 3.25: 1.63: 1.25: 1.00: 1.25. Metafemur 3.27 times as long as wide, widest at middle, with slight tibial groove; Metatibia 10 times as long as wide, very slightly wider apically and inwardly curved; mesotarsus about 1.25 times as long as tibia, with segment length ratio 3.82: 2.17: 1.67: 1.00: 1.67. Tibial spurs all relatively short and of equal lengths. Pretarsal claws moderately long and slender with relatively small, bisetose empodium. Abdomen with first ventrite (sternite III) slightly shorter than second, with intercoxal process very weakly developed or absent; concealed sternite II well-developed with weak median carina; ventrites 2–4 more or less equal in length and 5 slightly shorter than 4 and broadly rounded or subtruncate apically; abdominal tergites III–VI weakly sclerotised, VII (pygidium) moderately sclerotised with apex broadly rounded in female, subtruncate and slightly raised in male. Abdominal sternite VIII in male about 0.87 times as long as wide, widest near base and produced to form narrowly rounded apical lobe, lightly sclerotised basolaterally and membranous apicomesally; tergite VIII subquadrate, moderately sclerotised, with truncate base, slightly produced, rounded, setose apex, basomesal endocarina extending to about middle of sclerite, a pair of laterotergal appendages, each of which is about twice as long as wide, slightly curved mesally, narrowly rounded at apex with a number of short spines along internal edge, plus a flattened, sclerotised lobe at the base of each and extending to about middle of appendage. Segment IX with pregenital ring narrowly rounded anteriorly and tergite membranous. Aedeagus normally oriented, with tegmen dorsal to penis; tegmen with basale 2.33 times as long as wide, widest near base, base slightly acute; median linear sclerite extending from apex almost to base; apicale 0.4 times as long as basale, 1.8 times as long as wide, parallelsided with deeply emarginate apex forming a pair of obliquely rounded parameroids; base of apicale attached to a pair of long tegminal struts extending anteriorly and mesally to join at midline near base of penis. Penis 4.15 times as long as wide, widest at basal third with narrowly rounded apex; penis distinctly curved ventrally, with slender median projection at base which is attached to tegminal struts. Segment VIII in female weakly sclerotised at base and membranous apically, with long spiculum ventrale forked at base. Ovipositor about 6.5 times as long as wide, with distinct proctigeral and paraproctal but reduced coxital bacula; paraprocts 1.8 times as long as gonocoxites, which are 2.0 times as long as combined width; basal coxital lobes moderately heavily, evenly sclerotised, without basal bacula, broad at base, abruptly narrowed apically to form a pair of slender, contiguous, apically narrowly acute processes; apical lobes obliquely attached to basal lobes, membranous, densely setose, subcontiguous and apically truncate; gonostylus 0.23 times as long as coxite, apicolaterally attached, expanded apically and densely setose. + + +Types +. + +Hylecoetus pervagus +Olliff, 1889 + +: +Holotype +, sex?, “Lord Howe Island” (AMS). + +Hylecoetus vigilans +Lea, 1912 + +: +Holotype +♀ +, “Little Mulgrave River (H. Hacker) (SAM). +Syn. nov. + + +Other specimens examined +. + + +QLD +: + +Atherton +, +4 mi. +S, + +11.2.1975 + + +, + +H. & A. Howden +(1♁, +ANIC +); +Babinda +, + +28.xii.1972 + + +, + +M. S. Moulds +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +); +Babinda +, +4 mi. +W, + +10.iii.1964 + + +, + +I. F. B. Common +, +M. S. Upton +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Baldy Mtn. Rd. +, 6 mls +SW of Atherton +, + +1100m + +, + +27.xii.1972 + + +, + +B. Cantrell +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +Barron Falls +, +Kuranda +, + +24.x.1944 + + +, + +at light, +J. G. Brooks +( +4 ♀ +, +QDAF +; 1♁, +8♀ +, +ANIC +); +Barron Gorge Lookout +, +Kuranda +, + +27.i.1989 + + +, + +A. Sund-holm, +J. Bugeja +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Binna Burra +, + +27.xii.1969 + + +, MV light, + +R +. +Hardie +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Binna Burra +, +Lamington Nat. Park, J +. +Balderson +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Boar Creek +, + +xii.1969 + + +, + +J. G. Brooks +(1♁, +ANIC +); +Boar Pocket +, + +x.1970 + + +, + +J. G. +Brooks +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Bramston Beach Rd. on Tower Rd. +( +17°23.136’S +, +145°59.596’E +), + +93m + +, + +4.ix.2018 + + +, + +D. C. Rentz +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Bunya Mts. +, + +12.ii.1940 + + +, + +N. Geary +( +1♀ +, +AMS +); +Cairns +, +Macleay Museum +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Cairns +, +E. W. Ferguson +colln. ( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Cairns +, + +xii.1970 + + +, MV light, + +R +. +Hardie +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Cape Tribulation +, + +29.xii.1980 + + +, + +MV +lamp, G. & A. +Daniels +(2♁♁, +AMS +); +Cape Tribulation Area +(16°03’S to +16°05’S +, +145°28’E +), + +1–11.v.1992 + + +, + +J. F. Lawrence +(1♁, +ANIC +); +Cardstone +, + +15.xi.1966 + + +, + +J. G. Brooks +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Cardstone +, + +v.1972 + + +, + +D. Perkins +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Claudie River +, near +Mount Lamond +, 1.1972, at light, D, K, +McAlpine, G +. +Holloway +( +6♀♀ +, +AMS +); Coo-rumba, 11.1983, 1985 + +, + +R +. H. +Mudder +( +4♀♀ +, +AMS +); +Crystal Cascades +, +Cairns +, + +8.ix.1977 + + +, + +I. F. B. Common +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Cuningham’s Gap +, + +26.xi.1964 + + +, + +H. A. Rose +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +Daintree +, +12 km +S ( +16°19’S +, +145°24’E +), + +22.xi.1981 + + +, + +J. Balderson +(1♁, +ANIC +); +Forty Mile Scrub Nat. Park +( +18°06’S +, +144°52’E +), + +2–3.iii.1988 + + +, + +A. A. Calder +(1♁, +ANIC +); +Freedom Cunty +, nr. +Kuranda +, + +14.xii.1954 + + +, + +R +. +De Keyzer +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +); +Gap Creek +( +15°51’S +, +145°20’E +), + +20.xi.1992 + + +, + +at light, +A. Calder +, +P. Zborowski +(1♁, +ANIC +); +Gap Creek +, + +5 km +ESE Mt. Finnigan + +( +15°50’S +, +145°20’E +), + +13– 16.v.1981 + + +, + +at light, +I. D. Naumann +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Gap Creek +, + +5 mi. +N of Bloomfield River + +, 100’, + +8–9.v.1970 + + +, + +G. B. Monteith +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +Gap Creek +, +Mt. Finlayson Ra. +, nr. +Bloomfield +, + +2.i.1981 + + +, + +MV +lamp, G. & A. +Daniels +( +2♀♀ +, +AMS +); +Gordonvale +, +13 km +SwbyW ( +17°09’S +, +145°41’E +), + +16.xi.1981 + + +, + +J. Balderson +( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Hutchinson Creek +, near +Daintree + +, + +R +., + +7.i.1967 + + +, + +MV +lamp, D, K, +McAlpine +, G. +Holloway +( +1♀ +, +AMS +); +Innisfail, F. H +. +Taylor +, +Hylecoetus vigilans, H. J. Carter +det. ( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Innisfail +, + +21.x.1925 + + +, + +C. E. Simms +( +1♀ +, +AMS +); +Innisfail +, +4.5 mi. +E, + +50 ft. + +, rainforest, + +4.xi.1966 + + +, + +at light, +E. B. Britton +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Intake +, nr. +Redlynch +, + +30.xi.1967 + + +, + +R +. +Dobson +( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Iron Range +, + +v.1961 + + +, + +J. M. +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Iron Range +, + +9–12.iv.1964 + + +, + +I. F. B. Common +, +M. S. Upton +(1♁, +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Iron Range +, + +2.ii.1972 + + +. + +P. Zborowski +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Iron Range +, + +9.i.1972 + + +, + +M. Moulds +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Iron Range +, vi–vii,1981, D. W. +Frith +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Iron Range Nat. Park +, +Cooks Hut +, + +1 km +N Lammon Hill + +( +12°43’S +, +143°18’E +), + +17.vii.1988 + + +, at light, + +T +. A. +Weir +, +A. A. Calder +(1♁, +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Iron Range +, +Cape +York +Pen. +, + +28.iv– 4.v.1968 + + +, + +G. Monteith +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +Iron Range +, +West Claudie River +, + +6.xii.1985 + + +, + +D. Yeates +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +Jubilee Rd. +, + +4.5 mi. +NE Innisfail + +, + +4.xi.1966 + + +, + +at light, +E. B. Britton +(1♁, +ANIC +); +Julatten +, + +xii.1996 + +– + +ii.1997 + + +, + +at light, +B. P. Moore +(6♁♁, +3♀♀ +. +ANIC +); +Julatten +, + +3.xii.2004 + + +, + +at light, +B. P. Moore +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Kuranda +, + +12.i.1972 + + +, + +P. Zborowski +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Kuranda +, + +2.ii.1982 + + +, + +W. N. B. Quick +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Kuranda +, 19 +Butler Drive +(top of range), + +335m + +, + +X.2003 + +– + +II.2003 + + +- + +2007, 2010, 2015–2018, +D. C. F. Rentz +(13♁♁, +86♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Kuranda +, 19 +Butler Drive +(top of range), + +335m + +, + +1–15.xi.2015 + + +, + +D. C. F. Rentz +(1♁, +2♀♀ +, +AMS +); +Kuranda +, +1 mi. +E, + +11.iii.1964 + + +, + +I. F. B. Common +, +M. S. Upton +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Kuranda +, +1 mi. +N, + +23.iv.1969 + + +, + +I. F. B. Common +, +M. S. Upton +( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Kuranda +, +13 km +NW, + +6– 7.xii.1982 + + +, J. + +T +. +Doyen +(1♁, +3♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Kuranda Range St. For. +, + +10.i.1967 + + +, + +MV +lamp, D, K, +McAlpine, G. +Hol-loway (2♁♁, +AMS +); +Lake Barrine +, + +Atherton +Tableland + +(17.15’S, 145.38’E), + +13.xii.1985 + + +, + +J. +Balderson +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Lake Eacham +( +17°17’S +, +145°38’E +), + +23.xi.1998 + + +, + +at light, +A. Calder +(3♁♁, +ANIC +); +Lake Eacham Nat. Park +, + +2– 5.ii.1998 + + +, + +T +. A. +Weir +(1♁, +ANIC +); +McLeod River +, +14 km +WbyN +Mt. Carbine +( +16°30’S +, +145°00’E +), + +23.xi.1981 + + +, + +J. Balderson +( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Mission Beach +, + +1–5.x.1981 + + +, + +G. O’Reilly +(1♁, +4♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Mission Beach +, ix–x.1991, at light, +G. O’Reilly +(1♁, +5♀♀ +, +AMS +); +Mission Beach +, + +ix.1993 + + +, + +at light, +G. O’Reilly +(1♁, +AMS +); +Mission Beach +, + +20.ix.1994 + + +, + +at light, +G. O’Reilly +(1♁, +AMS +); +Moses Creek +, +4 km +NbyE +Mt. Finnigan +( +15°47’S +, +145°17’E +), + +14– 16.x.1980 + + +, + +T +. +Weir +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Mossman +, +3 mi. +W, + +14.iii.1964 + + +, + +I. F. B. Common +, +M. S. Upton +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); Moss- man +Gorge +, + +300 ft. + +, + +31.x.1966 + + +, + +at light, +E. B. Britton +(2♁♁, +3♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Mt. Glorious +, + +16.i.1972 + + +. + +G. Monteith +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +Mt. Glorious +, + +14.xi.1986 + + +, flight intercept/trough trap, + +T +. +Hiller +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Mt. Hypipamee N.P. +( +17°26’S +, +145°29’E +), closed forest, + +9–14.xi.1998 + + +, at light, + +T +. A. +Weir +(1♁, +ANIC +); +Mt. Hypipamee N.P. +( +17°26’S +, +145°29’E +), + +18–26.xi.1998 + + +, + +A. Calder +(4♁♁, +5♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Mt. Lamond +, +4 mi. +NE, +Iron Range +, + +3.i.1972 + + +, + +MV +light, D, K, McAl-pine, G. +Holloway +( +1♀ +, +AMS +); +Mt. Misery +, +SW of Cooktown +(15.52’S, 145.13’E), + +867m + +, + +20.i.1994 + + +, mv lamp, G. & A. Daniels, + +R +. +Eastwood +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +Mt. Tambourine +, + +17.xii.1925 + + +, + +A. Musgrave +( +1♀ +, +AMS +); +Mt. Tennison Woods +, via +Mt. Glorious +, + +17.iii.1975 + + +, + +rainforest, at light. K. J. +Lambkin +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +Mt. Tozer +, +2 km +ENE ( +12°44’S +, +143°13’E +), + +1.vii.1986 + + +, at + +MV +light, J. C. +Cardale +(1♁, +ANIC +); +Mt. Tozer +, +9 km +ENE ( +12°43’S +, +143°18’E +), + +5– 10.vii.1986 + + +, at light, + +T +. +Weir +, A. +Calder +, J. +Cardale +(2♁♁, +3♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Mt. Tozer +, +11 km +ENE ( +12°43’S +, +143°18’E +), + +11–16.vii.1986 + + +, at light, + +T +. +Weir +, A. +Calder +(1♁, +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Mulgrave River +, + +4 mi +W Gordonvale + +, + +29.xii.1966 + + +, + +MV +lamp, +D. K. McAlpine +, +G. Holloway +(1♁, +AMS +); +Nat. Park +, H. +Illidge +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +Palmerston Nat. Park +, +Tully-Cairns +powerline, + +1000 ft. + +, rainforest, + +5–6.xi.1966 + + +, + +E. B. Britton +( +3♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Palm Grove Nat. Park +( +Palm Grove Section of Tamborine National Park +), +Tamborine Mtn. +, + +24–29.x.1993 + + +, under bark, in rotten wood, S. A. Ślipiński, J. F. Lawrence 1♁, +1♀ +, + +ANIC +); +Paluma +, +6 km +NW on +Paluma Dam Rd. +( +18°59’S +, +146°09’E +), rainforest, + +14.i.1970 + + +, + +at light, +E. Britton +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Paluma +( +Mt. Spec +), + +5.i.1964 + + +, + + +MV +light, J. G. +Brooks +( +1♀ +, +AMS +, +K517765 +); +Polly Creek +, +Garradunga +(17°458’S + +, +146°021’E +), + +15.i.2010 + + +, + +MV +light, J. +Hasenpusch +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Shiptons Flat +( +15°47’S +, +145°14’E +), + +17–19.x.1980 + + +, + +T +. +Weir +(2♁♁, +ANIC +); +South Johnstone +, +15 km +WNW, + +15.xi.1985 +& +x.1986 + + +, + +light trap +, +Fay +& +Halfpapp +(1♁, +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Tamborine Mtn. +, + +i.1940 + + +, + +H. Hacker +( +1♀ +, +QDAF +); +Tinaroo Lake +, west short, + +2500 ft. + +, + +7.xi.1966 + + +, at light, E. B. Britton +3♀♀ +, + +ANIC +); +Townsville +, +F. H. Taylor +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Tully Falls +, + +13.i.1972 + + +, + +P. +Zborowski +( +1♀ +, +AMS +); +Tully Gorge Nat. Park +( +17°45’S +, +145°32’E +), + +1.iii.1988 + + +, + +at light, +A. A. Calder +(1♁, +ANIC +); +Upper Currumbin +, + +10.xi.1931 + +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Upper Mulgrave River +, + +30.iv.1970 + + +, + +G. B. Monteith +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +West Claudie River +, + +25.vi.1982 + + +, + +mv lamp, +G. Daniels +, +M. A. Schneider +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +West Claudie River +, +Iron Raqnge +, + +30.ix.1974 + + + +M. S. +Mounds +( +1♀ +, +AMS +); +Whitfield Range Timber Road +, c +13–24 km +frm +Cairns +( +16°53’S +, +145°44’E +), + +1600–2200 ft. + +, various dates, 1970–1972, at light, +J. G. Brooks +, +J. A. G. Brooks +(4♁♁, +54♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Windsor Tableland +, +NE of Mossman +(16.12’51”S, 145.04’09”E), site + +1, 810m + +, + +4.i.1984 + + +, mv lamp, G. & A. Daniels, + +R +. +Eastwood +( +3♀♀ +, +QMB +) + +. + + +NSW +: + +Cherry Tree St. +For., +Pennefathers Rdo. Via Casino +, + +10.ii.1997 + + +, + +MV +light, S. Watkins ( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Illawarra +, Kiama, +Hylecoetus pervagus, Macleay Mus. +( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +); +Lord Howe Island +, on banyan, A. M. Lea, + +Hylecoetus pervagus +Oll. + +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +, +1♀ +, +AMS +); +Lord Howe +I., + +1.i.1991 + + +, in light trap, + +R +. +Schwartz +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +); +Lord Howe Is. + +15.xii.1992 + + +, at UV light, G. + +R +. +Brown +(1♁, +ASCU +); +Lord Howe Island +, +Old + + +AM +Collection +( +1♀ +, +AMS +); +Lord Howe Island +, +Research Station +( +31°31’37”S +, +159°3’58”E +), + +12.ii.2001 + + +, + +S. J. Fellenberg +( +1♀ +, +AMS +); +Nighcap Nat. Park +, +Terania Ck. +, +N of Lismore +, + +15–16.xi.1988 + + +, + +UV +light, G. +Williams +( +1♀ +, +AMS +); +Tooloom Scrub +, +West of Urbenville +, + +14.xii.1979 + + +, at light in rainforest, G. & + +T +. +Williams +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Tooloom Plateau +, via +Urbenville +, + +16–17.xii.1972 + + +, + +at light, +G. B. Monteith +( +4♀♀ +, +QMB +); +Upper Allyn River +, + +800 ft. + +, + +6.ii.1961 + + +, + +I. F. B. Common +, +M. S. Upton +(1♁, +1♀ +, +ANIC +). +Wilson River +F + +. + +R +., NE of +Wauchope +, + +5–6.xii.1988 + + +, + +G. +Williams +( +1♀ +, +AMS +, +K517750 +) + +. + + + + +Distribution +. Widely distributed in NSW and QLD. + + + + +Biology +. Adults are usually collected at lights, but some have been taken in flight intercept traps. Specimens from Lord Howe Island were associated with banyan ( + +Ficus macrophylla +Desf. Ex Pers. + +f. +columnaris +). Adults, pupae and larvae were collected in white rotted wood of a piccabeen palm ( + +Archontophoenix cunninghamiana +(H. Wendl.) H. Wendl. & Drude + +) in what is now the Palm Grove Section of Tamborine Mountain National Park, QLD. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0045D78FF4691EC766EF9DD.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0045D78FF4691EC766EF9DD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9e326d1dd2e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0045D78FF4691EC766EF9DD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Arractocetus +Kurosawa, 1985 + + + + + + + + + + +Arractocetus +Kurosawa, 1985: 112 + + +. + + + + +Type +species: + +Atractocerus nipponicus +Nakane, 1985 + +(original designation). + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Species of + +Arractocetus + +are distinguished from other atractocerines by the head, which is declined, flattened above and abruptly declined posteriorly, the head and pronotum densely clothed with hairs, the pronotum subquadrate with a distinct median groove, and the hind wings often darkened or metallic. Eyes in this genus are very finely facetted, with individual facets flattened rather than convex. + + +Distrubution. + +Arractocetus + +is primarily an Oriental genus, distributed from +India +to Southeast Asia, +Indonesia +, New +Guinea +, northern +Australia +, the +Philippines +, +Taiwan +and southern +Japan +. + + + + +Biology. +As noted by +Kurosawa (1985) +, the eye +type +in this genus is indicative of diurnal habits and the colour patterns appear to mimic those of various Hymenoptera. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0045D78FF4695D070EAFBC8.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0045D78FF4695D070EAFBC8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..24281dcd83a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0045D78FF4695D070EAFBC8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,211 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Atractocerinae +Laporte, 1840 + + + + + + + +The +Atractocerinae +are unique among the +Coleoptera +in many respects, but notably in the extreme reduction of the elytra combined with the lack of transverse folds in the hind wings, which are almost completely exposed, lying over the abdomen. Based on the wing character alone, this subfamily was treated as a beetle suborder, Aplicalae, by +King (1955) +; but +Selander (1959) +demonstrated that this wing +type +could be derived from that found in the lymexylid genus + +Melittomma + +. Likewise, +Baehr (1976) +in his detailed descriptive paper on the prothoracic morphology of “ + +Atractocerus + +sp.” commented on several structures (e.g., spinasternum, dorsal cervical sclerites, karepisternum, which “have been lost” in all other +Coleoptera +. Although this group appears to be derived from an ancestor well within the Polyphaga, the family +Lymexylidae +being part of or sister to the large superfamily +Tenebrionoidea +, the adult has certainly undergone major changes in body structure. + + +The ideas on relationships of atractocerines to other lymexylids have not really changed from those of +Wheeler (1986) +, with the Palaearctic genus + +Lymexylon +Fabricius + +as the sister group. It may be time, however, for a worldwide analysis to be performed based on adult and larval morphology and molecular data. This, however, is beyond the scope of the present study. + + + + +As noted in the Introduction, the subfamily now includes six extant genera: + +Arractocetus +Kurosawa (1985) + +, with ten species from +Japan +, +Taiwan +, Southeast Asia, the +Philippines +, +India +, +Indonesia +, New +Guinea +and the +Moluccas +; + +Atractocerus +de Beauvois (1801) + +, with eight species from Central and South America, the West Indies, tropical Africa, +Madagascar +, +India +, +Sri Lanka +, Sumatra and southern +China +; + +Fusicornis +Philippi (1866) + +, with a single species from +Chile +; + +Hymaloxylon +Kurosawa (1985) + +, with two species from +India +, +Nepal +and western +China +; + +Raractocetus +Kurasawa (1985) + +, with two species from +India +, the +Philippines +, +Taiwan +, Southeast Asia, +Indonesia +and +Australia +(introduced with + +Eucalyptus + +into +New Zealand +and +Chile +); and + +Urtea +Paulus (2004) + +with one species from northern +Greece +. In addition, the following fossil +Atractocerinae +have been reported: +Cretoatractocerus grimaldii +WolfSchwenninger (2011), the earliest member of the group from the Lower Cretaceous (Upper Aptian) Crato Formation of +Brazil +, plus +Vetatractocerus burmiticus +Yamamoto,(2019), + +Raractocetus extinctus +Yamamoto (2019) + +and + +R. fossilis +Yamamoto (2019) + +from the mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber (earliest Cenomanian), + +R. balticus +Yamamoto (2019) + +from mid-Eocene Baltic amber and + +Atractocerus + +sp. from Miocene Dominican amber ( +Yamamoto, 2019 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0045D7AFF4693D977A5FBA4.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0045D7AFF4693D977A5FBA4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bc939356c0b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0045D7AFF4693D977A5FBA4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Arractocetus + +sp. + + + + + + + +Description of female specimens from northern QLD and +Papua New Guinea +. + +Body about 8 times as long as wide; colour primarily dark reddish-brown to black, with exposed hind wings pigmented, often with metallic blue or violet reflection; elytra variable in colour, dark-brown or almost black with varying amounts of yellow; undersurface of head and some mouthparts yellow, mandibles reddish-brown, coxae, femora, and portions of abdominal ventrites yellow or yellowish-brown; palp-organ black; tibiae and tarsi dark brown. Head 1.25 times as long as wide, somewhat declined, gradually narrowed behind eyes, without temples or neck; base weakly biemarginate dorsally, surface flattened anteriorly, declined posteriorly but without transverse ridge. Eye about 0.71 times as long as head width and 1.43 times as long as wide, distinctly emarginate anteroventrally, weakly protruding and very finely facetted, with flattened facets and fine interfacetal hairs; distance across eyes dorsally 3.00 times and ventrally 1.29 times distance between them. Antennal insertions concealed by frontal ridges which extend slightly into eye emargination. Labrum reduced, apically acute and fused to clypeus. Antennae 11-segmented, about 1.3 times as long as head width, ratio of antennomere lengths 2.50: 1.50: 2.50: 2.00: 2.00: 1.75: 1.75: 1.50: 1.25: 1.00: 2.00 and antennomere length/width ratios 1.25, 1.00, 1.43, 1.00, 1.00, 0.87, 0.87, 1.00, 0.83, 0.67, 1.60; terminal antennomere abruptly narrowed subapically and acute at apex. Mandible about 1.25 times as long as wide; outer edge densely clothed with long, fine setae; apex unidentate; mola and prostheca absent. Maxilla with galea 2.9 times as long as wide, widest at base, distinctly curved mesally with mesal surface concave, apex narrowly rounded and lateral edge densely setose; lacinia shorter than galea, 3.1 times as long as wide with narrowly rounded apex and more sparsely setose; palpomere 3 globose, capsule-like, 4 slender with narrowly rounded apex and palp organ complex, with 14 major branches and numerous secondary ones. Mentum about twice as long as wide; ligula 2.67 times as long as wide with narrowly rounded apex. labial palps separated by slightly more than the basal width of one; ratio of palpomere lengths 1.67: 1.00: 3.83, apical palpomere narrowly rounded at apex. Submentum relatively short, not separated from gula, which is transversely quadrate between parallel gular sutures. Ventral surface of head slightly biconcave, with short subantennal grooves. Cervical sclerites about 6.2 times as long as wide, irregularly undulate, undivided. Pronotum 0.77–0.91 (0.83) times as long as wide, widest anteriorly with sides slightly sinuate, converging posteriorly, without lateral carinae; anterior edge truncate; anterior angles not produced forward, broadly rounded; posterior angles more or less right but with rounded tips; posterior edge strongly biemarginate laterally, with broadly rounded mesal lobe; disc more or less flattened, with deep groove and endocarina extending from posterior edge almost to anterior edge; punctation fine and sparse, vestiture of inclined or suberect fine hairs. Prosternum about 0.57 times as long as mid length of a procoxal cavity, anteriorly biemarginate forming median angulate lobe; surface relatively flat; posterior edge triemarginate with an internal marginal ridge; notosternal sutures very short, straight and complete. Prosternal process absent. Procoxal cavities large and broadly open externally and internally, without notch at base of notosternal suture; postcoxal (hypomeral) process absent; protrochantin well-developed, externally visible, transverse, mesally slender and laterally subtriangular. Scutellar virtually absent, consisting of a short strip of cuticle weakly bilobed at apex, not separated from scutum, which has a complete median endocarina and is concave laterally to house sub-basal portions of elytra. Elytra 1.39–1.81 (1.58) times as long as greatest combined basal width and 1.60–1.96 (1.69) times as long as pronotum; separated for most of their lengths, but meeting at anterior fourth just behind scutellar shield; each elytron 2.96 times as long as wide, widest at anterior fifth with outer edge weakly curved and inner edge more or less sinuate and apex very broadly rounded; outer elytral angles more or less rounded; disc inflated between anterior fifth and sixth, forming an ovate boss covered with darkly pigmented, spiculate punctures, remaining punctation fine, confused and bearing short, inclined hairs. Mesoventrite 0.38 times as long as wide, widest at middle; anterior edge broadly, deeply emarginate, without coxal rests; sides slightly sinuate and incompletely separated from the almost vertical mesanepisterna; surface smooth and apunctate; posterior edge weakly emarginate on either side of a short, broadly rounded lobe. Mesocoxal cavities very weakly impressed, contiguous, without posterior edges. Metaventrite 1.35 times as long at midline and 1.73 times as long laterally as greatest width, strongly convex, without discrimen; posterior edge slightly curved and oblique on either side of subtriangular intercoxal lobe with fine notch at apex; Metanepisternum about 5.45 times as long as wide, widest anteriorly and narrowed to subacute apex. Metendosternite with long, narrow stalk, paired, slender lateral arms forming an angle of about 30° and a long, slender, apically acute anterior process. Hind wing about 3.1 times long as wide; apical field 0.28 times as long as wing length, with radial extensions obliterated basally but extending to apical wing margin; radial cell absent; radial and medial veins joined at apical fourth of wing by transverse connection straight anteriorly curved posteriorly and probably derived from cross-vein r4 and the radiomedial loop; MP +1+2 +long, straight and continuing as medial spur to wing edge; medial field with six veins, the last two reaching wing edge. Anal lobe reduced, without embayment, containing AP +3+4 +. Procoxa 3.00 times as long as wide, widest near base and very slightly narrowed to apex, strongly projecting; Mesocoxa 2.14 times as long as wide, widest near base and slightly narrowed apically, slightly projecting. Metacoxa about 0.27 times as long as wide, strongly oblique, almost contiguous and projecting near midline, without weak coxal cowling on mesal half. Trochanterofemoral joints strongly oblique, but with femur well separated from coxa. Fore legs relatively short: profemur subeqal in length to coxa, 3.0 times as long as wide; protibia 1.2 times as long as femur, 7.2 times as long as wide, parallelsided, not expanded at apex; protarsi combined about equal in length to tibia, with segment length ratio 7.50: 3.00: 2.00: 1.00: 4.00. Mid and hind legs longer and slender. Mesofemur 4.10 times as long as wide, barely wider at middle; mesotibia 1.60 times as long as femur, 14.4 times as long as wide and more or less parallel-sided; combined tarsal length 0.82 times that of tibia, with segment lengths 4.60: 2.40: 1.80: 1.00: 2.00. Metafemur 4.00 times as long as wide, widest at basal third; metatibia 1.60 times as long as femur, 16.0 times as long as wide and more or less parallel-sided; combined tarsal length 0.97 times that of tibia, with segment lengths 4.17: 1.83: 1.33: 1.00: 2.00. All tarsomeres simple, without ventral lobes, but densely lined with fine, erect hairs; pretarsal claws moderately long and slender, empodium with several setae. Abdomen with tergites and sternites more or less equal in length and degree of sclerotisation; first segment (sternite and tergite II) about 0.85 times as long as second, with intercoxal process absent; segments 2–6 subequal in length; ventrite 7 (sternite VIII) shorter than 6, 1.50 times as long as wide, with broadly rounded apex; tergite VIII with strongly rounded apex; segment IX 0.58 times as long as VIII and 1.25 times as long as wide, with both tergite and sternite emarginate; spiculum ventrale extending from about middle of sternite to beyond its base. Ovipositor 3.00 times as long as wide, 1.20 times as long as segment VIII, more or less parallel-sided; paraprocts 0.5 times as long as gonocoxites, which are twice as long as wide; apical coxital lobe about 2.67 times as long as basal lobe, with sides subparallel for basal two-thirds, then converging to form paired acute extensions; gonostyli about 0.33 times as long as apical lobes, 4.0 times as long as wide, parallel-sided and attached laterally at bases of acute extensions; ventral sclerite about as long as apical coxital lobe without extension; proctiger setose and apically truncate, bacula converging anteriorly and almost meeting. Male not examined. + + +Note +. This species is probably one of the “blackish” forms keyed out by Kurasawa (1985), such as + +A. nipponicus +(Nakane) + +, + +A. morio +(Pascoe) + +or + +A. monticola +Kurasawa + +, but additional material would be necessary to place the species, assuming it has been described. + + +Specimens Examined. QLD: + +Gordon Creek area +, +Claudie River district +, + +5.vii.1982 + +, M. A. +Schneider +, G. +Daniels +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +McIlwraith Range +, +11 km +WbyN of +Bald Hill +( +13°44’S +, +143°20’E +), search party campsite, + +520m + +,, + +27.vi–12.vii.1989 + +, surfaces at night, on ground + +, T. + +A. +Weir +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Mt. Tozer +, +9 km +NE ( +12°43’S +, +143°17’E +), + +5–10.vii.1986 + +, +Malaise trap +/ethanol, +J. C. Cardale +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); + + +Mt. Tozer +, +11 km +ENE ( +12°43’S +, +143°18’E +), + +11– 16.vii.1986 + +, +J. C. Cardale +, +Malaise trap +/ethanol, J. C. +Cardale +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +. + + +Papua New Guinea +: + +Morobe Province +: +Bulolo +, + +20.i.1970 + +, on log, L. +Radunz +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0065D7AFF4691C07019FA6F.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0065D7AFF4691C07019FA6F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9f21a3883de --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0065D7AFF4691C07019FA6F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Atractocerus +Palisot de Beauvois, 1801 + + + + + + + + +Atractocerus +Palisot de Beauvois, 1801: 3 + +. + + + + +Type +species: + +Atractocerus necydaloides +Palisot de Beauvois + +(monotypy) (= + +Necydalis brevicornis +Linnaeus, 1766 + +). + + + + +Diagnosis +. Species of + +Atractocerus + +in the strict sense are characterised by the large, elongate eyes, elongate, horizontal head, which is narrower than the pronotum, and very short elytra. + + + + +Distribution +. At least ten species of + +Atractocerus + +have been described from California to +Brazil +, Africa, +Madagascar +, +India +, +Sri Lanka +, Southeast Asia, +Indonesia +and northwestern +Australia +, but it is not certain that all of these species are congeneric. According to Kurasawa (1985), + +A. brevicornis +(Linnaeus) + +, + +A. reversus +Walker + +and + +A. brasiliensis +Lepeletier & Audinet-Serville + +belong to this genus, and + +A. crassicornis +Clark + +should be added to this list. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0065D7AFF46931771A3F860.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0065D7AFF46931771A3F860.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c540e458559 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0065D7AFF46931771A3F860.xml @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Atractocerus crassicornis +Clark, 1931 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 22–23 +) + + + + + + + +Atractocerus crassicornis +Clark, 1931: 120 + + +. +Type +, + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Comparison with other species in the genus is not possible due to lack of material, and differences from other Australian lymexylid genera may be found in the generic key. + + +Specimens Examined. NT +: + +Dorisvale HS +, +29 mi. +SW ( +14°48’S +, +131°02’E +), + +9.viii.1968 + +, +M. Mendum +( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +); Katherine, +Manbulloo Station + +10.vii.1929 + +, +T + +. + +G. Campbell +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Victoria +River Roadhouse +, +1.2 km +NNW, +Victoria +River Highway +( +15°06’S +, +131°18’E +), + +23.iii.1999 + +, +D. C. F. Rentz +, +P. Naskrecki +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Known only from the +Northern Territory +. + + + + +Biology. +The +type +was collected at lights at night, but nothing else is known of the biology. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0075D64FF4694917060FA77.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0075D64FF4694917060FA77.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..711773e7938 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0075D64FF4694917060FA77.xml @@ -0,0 +1,352 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Leptonetron victoriense +( +Blackburn, 1891 +) + +comb. nov. + + + +(Figs 15–16, 19) + + + + + + +Atractocerus victoriensis + +Blackburn, 1891: 306 + + + +. +Type +, female, +Victoria +, Collection of +C. French +(MVM). + + + + + + +Atractocerus tasmaniensis +Lea, 1917: 143 + + +, + +syn. nov. + +Type +, male, +Tasmania +: Triabunna (G. H. Hardy). +Type +I. 6740 (SAM). + +Fusicornis tasmaniensis +( +Lea, 1917 +) + +, +Paulus (2004) +. + + + + + +Redescription. +Total length: 9.80–24.80 (15.37 ± 4.20, n = 16); body 12.60–17.32 (14.45) times as long as combined elytral width. Head 1.25 times as long as wide, more or less globular, not constricted posteriorly, without temples or neck; base weakly biemarginate dorsally, usually with median, longitudinal groove between eyes. Eye about 0.78 times as long as head width, distinctly emarginate anteriorly, protruding and finely facetted, with fine interfacetal hairs; distance across eyes dorsally is 4.88 times and ventrally 1.86 times distance between them.Antennal insertions concealed by frontal ridges which extend slightly into eye emargination. Frontoclypeal suture absent. Labrum about 0.6 times as long as wide, densely setose, with base slightly curved and sides strongly converging to narrowly rounded apex. Antennae 12-segmented in both sexes, slightly shorter than head width in male, with antennomere 2 widest, ratio of antennomere lengths 2.60: 2.20: 2.00: 1.20: 1.00: 1.00: 1.00: 1.20: 1.00: 1.20: 1.40: 2.00 and antennomere length/width ratios 1.44, 1.10, 1.11, 0.75, 0.83, 1.11, 2.00, 2.40, 2.00, 2.40, 2.80, 5.00; slightly longer than head width in female, with antennomere 3 widest, ratio of antennomere lengths 3.00: 1,83: 2.00: 1.50: 1.50: 1.33: 1.33: 1.25: 1.17: 1.00: 1.00: 1.33 and antennomere length/width ratios 2.00, 1.10, 0.75, 0.56, 0.60, 0.57, 0.67, 0.75, 0.78, 0.71, 0.75, 2.00; terminal antennomere in both sexes acute at apex. Mandible about 1.43 times as long as wide; outer edge densely clothed with long, fine setae; apex bidentate with ventral tooth somewhat smaller than dorsal one; mola and prostheca absent. Maxilla highly reduced, with short lacinia narrowly rounded at apex, longer galea broadly rounded at apex and both densely clothed with long setae; first maxillary palpomere 1.67 times as long as wide, second and third closely associated by oblique joint, the two together about 3 times as long as wide, fourth palpomere 4 times as long as wide and narrowly rounded apically; palp organ simple, with two sets of paired lobes. Labial palps approximate, apical palpomere 2.0 times as long as basal one, 2.3 times as long as wide, with narrowly rounded apex. Gular sutures parallel. Cervical sclerites very large, the combined lengths of the two lobes about equal to head width. Pronotum 1.16–1.52 (1.34) times as long as wide, widest anteriorly; sides gradually converging posteriorly, weakly sinuate, without lateral carinae; anterior edge broadly curved; anterior angles not produced, broadly rounded; posterior angles rounded; posterior edge weakly biemarginate laterally and truncate mesally; disc moderately convex, coarsely and densely punctate and clothed with fine, suberect setae; longitudinal groove (endocarina) extending from anterior fourth to posterior fifth. Prosternum about 1.5 times as long as mid length of a procoxal cavity, distinctly convex, with biconcave anterior edge; notosternal sutures straight and complete. Prosternal process short, broad and broadly truncate at apex. Procoxal cavities large and broadly open externally and internally, with notch at base of notosternal suture; postcoxal (hypomeral) process absent; protrochantin well-developed and externally visible, more or less trapezoidal; endopleuron short, broadly expanded at apex. Scutellar shield not clearly separated from remainder of exposed scutellum, slightly elongate and rounded at apex. Elytra 1.77–1.79 (1.78) times as long as greatest combined width and 1.40–1.85 (1.57) times as long as pronotum, separated for their entire lengths, but almost meeting at anterior fourth just behind scutellar shield; each elytron about 1.8 times as long as pronotum and 3.5 times as long as wide, widest at anterior fourth with outer edge sinuate beyond middle and inner edge concave beyond anterior fourth; outer elytral angles more or less rounded and apices independently broadly rounded and well separated; disc with punctation confused, dense, coarse anteriorly and fine posteriorly, each puncture bearing a short fine, inclined seta. Mesoventrite 0.68 times as long as wide, widest at anterior end and gradually narrowed posteriorly; anterior edge emarginate, without coxal rests, with weak median endocarina extending to posterior third and a small, deep pit just before short intercoxal process. Mesocoxal cavities virtually absent. Metaventrite 1.75 times as long as wide, strongly convex, without discrimen; metacoxal cavities strongly oblique and narrowly separated. Metendosternite with long, narrow stalk and paired, slender lateral arms forming an angle of about 30°. Hind wing about 4 times long as wide; apical field 0.26 times as long as wing length, with two short radial extensions; radial cell absent; radial and medial veins joined at apical fourth of wing by transverse connection straight anteriorly, curved posteriorly and probably derived from cross-vein r4 and the radiomedial loop; MP1+2 long, straight and continuing as medial spur to wing edge; medial field with three veins reaching wing edge and probably corresponding to CuA, CuP + AA +3 +and AA +4 +. Anal lobe reduced, without embayment, with single vein (AP +3+4 +). Procoxa 3.00 times as long as wide, widest near base and very slightly narrowed to apex, strongly projecting; Mesocoxa 1.85 times as long as wide, widest near base and slightly narrowed apically, slightly projecting near midline. Metacoxa about 0.38 times as long as wide, strongly oblique, almost contiguous and projecting near midline, without coxal cowling, Fore legs relatively short: profemur slightly shorter than coxa, 2.4 times as long as wide; protibia about equal in length to femur, 5.3 times as long as wide, parallel-sided, not expanded at apex; protarsi combined about equal in length to tibia, with segment length ratio 3.43: 1.43: 1.14: 1.00: 2.57. Mid and hind legs very long and slender, each with femur about 3.42 times as long as wide and widest at middle; tibia 2.00 times as long as femur, about 16 times as long as wide and more or less parallel-sided; combined tarsal length about 2.00 times as long as tibia, with segment lengths 3.17: 2.22: 1.72: 1.17: 1.00. All tarsomeres simple, without ventral lobes, but densely lined with fine, erect hairs; pretarsal claws moderately long and slender, empodium with several setae. Abdomen with tergites and sternites more or less equal in length and degree of sclerotisation; first segment (sternite and tergite II) about 0.85 times as long as second, with intercoxal process absent; segments 2–6 subequal in length; ventrite 7 (sternite VIII) about 0.85 times as long as 6 and subacute at apex, tergite VIII (pygidium) slightly longer and narrowly rounded at apex. Segment IX in male about 3.0 times as long as wide, widest at posterior third, apex deeply emarginate to form two rounded lobes; pregenital ring anteriorly subacute; tergite X not separated from IX, the apex of which is narrowly rounded. Basale 1.4 times as long as wide, widest at apex, with broadly rounded base and truncate apex; parameroids 1.13 times as long as phallobase, contiguous at base, but well separated apically, each 1.7 times as long as basal width, 2.4 times as long as mid width and narrowly rounded at apex. Penis short, slender, strongly curved dorsally and more or less enclosed within phallobase. + + +Specimens Examined. TAS +: + +Collinsvale +, + +27.i.1989 + +, +N. W. Rodd +(1♁, +AMS +) + +; + +Triabunna, G. H +. +Hardy +( +SAM +, +Type +I. 6740). +VIC +: +Beaconsfield +, + +8.xii.1923 + +, +G. F. Hill +(3♁♁#, +ANIC +) + +; + +No +specific locality ( +Type +, +MVM +; 2 +Cotypes +SAM +) + +; + +Woori Yallock +, + +22.xii.1936 + +, +F. E. Wilson +(3♁♁, +1♀ +, +MVM +) + +; + +Wyperfield Nat. Park +( +35°41’S +, +141°36’E +), + +28.xi.1997 + +, +J. & A. Skevington +, +S. Winterton +, C. +Lambkin +(1♁, +QMB +) + +; + +Yarragon +, +Moe River +, “taken out of piles”, +W. Kershaw +(3♁♁, +1♀ +, +MVM +). + +NSW + +: +Grafton +, +12 km +S, + +10.i.1958 + +, +E. F. Riek +(2♁♁, +ANIC +) + +; + +Singleton +, +48 km +N, “Tuglo”, + +31.i.1977 + +, +C. N. Smithers +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Tamworth +, +23 km +SE, + +25.xi.1982 + +, +D. S. Horning +(1♁. +ANIC +). + +QLD + +: +Brisbane +, + +16.x.1911 + +, +H. Hacker +(1♁, +QMB +) + +; + +Mt. Coot-tha +( +27°29’S +, +152°57’E +), + +8.xi.1997 + +, +C. Lambkin +(1♁, +QMB +) + +; + +Mt. Coot-tha +( +27°29’S +, +152°57’E +), + +170m + +, + +26.x.1997 + +, hilltoping, J. +Skevington +(1♁, +QMB +) + +. + +WA +: +Warren River +, nr. +Pemberton +( +3♀♀ +, +AMS +) + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Southern +Australia +from TAS to southern QLD and southern WA. + + + + +Biology. +Specimens from Yarragon River in +Victoria +were “taken out of piles” (apparently logs). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0075D7BFF4695D0776AFE15.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0075D7BFF4695D0776AFE15.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6ce344c791f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0075D7BFF4695D0776AFE15.xml @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Leptonetron + +gen. nov. + + + + + + + +Type +species. + + +Atractocerus victoriensis +Blackburn, 1891 + +, here designated. + + + + +Diagnosis. +This genus is distinguished from all other atractocerines by the 12-segmented antennae in both sexes, the narrowly elongate pronotum, the very long and slender legs with tibia twice as long as femur and combined tarsomeres twice as long as tibia. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00A5D76FF4695D077A6FCAB.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00A5D76FF4695D077A6FCAB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..16f94dc73a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00A5D76FF4695D077A6FCAB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Melittommatinae, +Wheeler, 1986 + + + + + + + +The subfamily +Melittommatinae +was proposed by +Wheeler (1986) +for those members of the family +Lymexylidae +in which the elytra completely conceal the abdomen or expose at most two abdominal terga, and the larvae have a heavily sclerotised, truncate tergite IX. The largest genus in this group is + +Melittomma + +, with about 20 species primarily in tropical and subtropical regions of both Western and Eastern Hemispheres. Other currently recognised genera include + +Melittommopsis +Lane (1955) + +, with at least four species from South America, the monotypic + +Protomelittomma +Wheeler (1986) + +from the +Seychelles +and +Madagascar +and the Australian + +Australymexylon +Wheeler (1986) + +. The remaining fossil species, + +Ponomarenkylon alexandri +Kirejtshuk (2008) + +, an apparent Melittommatine from Baltic amber differ from other lymexylids in having: 1) very large eyes, (2) unusually short prothorax 3) filiform antennae and 4) the apparent connation of the first three abdominal ventrites (straight margins separating the first three ventrites and curved margins separating 3 from 4 and 4 from 5). Only a re-examination of the +holotype +will support or refute the author’s hypothesis. + + +More than 20 years ago, the genus, + +Alcestoma +Fairmaire (1895) + +was transferred to +Lymexylidae +from +Melandryidae +in a supplement to a paper dealing with a portion of the beetle fauna of the Prioksko-Terrasny Biosphere Reserve in the +Moscow Region +, +Russia +( + +Nikitsky +et al +. 1998 + +). Fortunately, Dr. Nikitsky photographed the +types +in his possession and sent me a habitus figure plus several detailed images. Based on these images, there is little doubt that this species is congeneric with + +Melittomma insulare +Fairmaire (1893) + +from the +Seychelles +, which was made the +type +species of + +Protomelittomma +Wheeler (1986) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00A5D77FF4696CC7637FE40.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00A5D77FF4696CC7637FE40.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f7f7f1b7c2d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00A5D77FF4696CC7637FE40.xml @@ -0,0 +1,290 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Alcestoma +Fairmaire, 1895 + + + + + + + + + + +Alcestoma +Fairmaire, 1895: 356 + + +. + + + + +Type +species + +Alcestoma serropalpoides +Fairmaire, 1895 + +(by monotypy). + + + + + + + + +Protomelittomma +Wheeler, 1986: 177 + + +. +Type +species + +Melittomma insulare +Fairmaire, 1893 + +(by original designation) +syn. nov. + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Adults of + +Alcestoma + +species differ from those of + +Australymexylon +Wheeler + +in having larger eyes, more narrowly separated dorsally, a more abrupt constriction behind the eyes, forming a distinct neck, a distinct maxillary palp organ in the male, lack of setose pads on sternite VIII of the male, and parameroids distinctly longer than the basale. From adults of + +Melittomma +Murray (1867) + +, they differ by having relatively long and broad lobes of parameroids (not short, slender and setose) and lacking the appendiculate paratergites on segment IX in the male. The presence of a row of broad spines at the apex of each parameroid in + +A. insulare +(Fairmaire) + +, illustrated in +Wheeler (1986) +, is lacking in the Australian species described below, as well in at least two undescribed species from +Madagascar +. The shape of the pronotum, which is widest at or near the base with an evenly curved anterior edge, is similar to most + +Melittomma + +species, but differs considerably from that of the Australian + +Melittomma pervagum +( +Olliff, 1889 +) + +(see below). Species of + +Alcestoma + +differ from those of the South American genus + +Melittommopsis +Lane (1955) + +in the more or less parallel-sided maxillary palpomere in the female, lack of a slender, elongate elevated area at the anterior end of the mesoventrite and lack of enlarged paratergites on segment IX in the male. + + + +Exotic Spcecies of + +Alcestoma + + +. Although + +Alcestoma insulare +(Fairmaire) + +was described from the +Seychelles +, +Wheeler (1986) +noted that this species (as + +Protomelittomma insulare + +) also occurred in +Madagascar +and synonymised the +Madagascar +species, + +Melittomma curtipenne +Pic (1939) + +with + +insulare + +. From Wheeler’s description and comments, it appears that two or more species may have been included by him under the name + +insulare + +. Most characters illustrated were probably based on +Seychelles +specimens of the common coconut pest, but the colour was described as “nearly black” and not “cinnamon-brown” as indicated by +Vesey-FitzGerald (1941) +, and a black +Madagascar +female ( +Fig. 4 +) in the California Academy of Sciences, labelled by Wheeler as + +Protomelittomma insulare + +, is certainly a different species and probably synonymous with + +Alcestoma serropalpoides + +based on external similarity to a photographs of a female +type +( +Fig. 8 +). The +types +of + +A. serropalpoides + +were collected at “Ténérive”, apparently an old name or misspelling of +Antananarivo +, located in the central portion of the island, and the black female mentioned above was taken at “Chutes de la Mort”, probably referring to Lily Waterfall west of +Antananarivo +. Two more species of + +Alcestoma + +have been seen from further south in the province of +Fianarantsoa +; these differ significantly from both + +A. serropalpoides + +and + +A. insulare + +and have distinctive male genitalia +Figs 26–27 +). Their descriptions, however, must await a more complete study of available +Madagascar +material. + + +According to +Brown (1954) +, + +Alcestoma insulare + +does occur in +Madagascar +, as well as the +Seychelles +, based on careful comparisons, including the distinctive aedeagus ( +Wheeler, 1986 +, figs 270, 273), but all of the +Madagascar +records made at that time were from the northwestern corner of the main island and the small islands of Nossi Bé and Nossi Comba. Vesey-FirzGerald (1941) considered + +A. insulare + +to be indigenous in the +Seychelles +, where it was originally associated with the endemic palms ( +Arecaceae +) + +Phoenicophorium + +(formerly + +Stevensonia + +) +borsigianum +(K. Koch) Stuntz and + +Nephrosperma vanhoutteanum +(H. Wendl. ex Van Houtte) Balf. + +f., and only later began attacking coconuts ( + +Cocos nucifera +Linnaeus + +), which were apparently present on the islands at least since 1742 (Bradley 1940). +Brown (1954) +was unable to come to a conclusion regarding the origin of this lymexylid. Given the presence of several species in +Madagascar +and at least one more in +Australia +, it is likely that this is an old lineage centred around the Malagasy region but extending at least to +Australia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00B5D72FF4697657433FEF4.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00B5D72FF4697657433FEF4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6a8a11c5e56 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00B5D72FF4697657433FEF4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1083 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Alcestoma queenslandicum + +sp. n. + + + + + + +( +Figs 2–3, 6, 9–10 +, +28 +) + + + + +Diagnosis. +This species resembles + +A. serropalpoides + +in general shape and coloration, but differs in the coarser, sparser pronotal punctation, more densely setose upper surfaces and more sharply serrate antennomeres 4–10; unfortunately the aedeagus of that species has not been described. + +A. queenslandicum + +differs from + +A. insulare + +, not only in general shape and colour (darker and more slender) but in the structure of the aedeagus, which has a narrowly rounded parameroid apex, lacking the apical row of spines which characterises the +Seychelles +species. + + + + +Description. +Total length: males, +7.80–13.10 mm +(10.60 ± 1.70, n = 22), females, 7.00–22.00 (13.00 ± 3.60, n = 69); body 4.05–5.25 (4.13) times as long as combined elytral width. Colour of head black above; pronotum reddish-brown to dark brown or black, sometimes reddish along margins; elytra reddish-brown to dark brown or black, sometimes reddish along suture; undersurfaces, legs and antennae yellowish-brown to reddish-brown or dark brown. Upper surfaces densely, more or less evenly clothed with moderately long, inclined, fine hairs; undersurfaces with somewhat shorter hairs. Head 1.10 times as long as wide, abruptly constricted to form neck, which is 0.64 times as wide as head. Eye about 0.54 times as long as head width, slightly emarginate anteriorly, protruding and finely facetted, with short, fine interfacetal hairs; distance across eyes 10.4 times shortest distance between them both dorsally and ventrally. Vertex without transverse ridge. Temples 0.13 times as long as eye length. Antennal insertions concealed by frontal ridges which extend slightly into eye emargination. Clypeus 0.30 times as long as wide with parallel sides and truncate apex. Labrum 0.65 times as wide as clypeus, 0.61 times as long as wide, with sides slightly curved, apex subtruncate and surface densely setose. Antennae in male about 1.1 times as long as head width behind eyes; antennomere length ratio: 1.67: 1.00: 1.87: 1.93:1.80: 1.80: 1.67: 1.87: 1.67: 1.53: 2.47; antennomere length/width: 1.67, 1.07, 2.15, 1.81, 1.50, 1.59, 1.67, 1.93, 1.79, 1.77, 3.70. Antenna in female 1.73 times as long as head width behind eyes; antennomere length ratio: 1.59: 1.00: 1.59: 1.71: 1.82: 1.94: 1.88: 2.00: 1.94: 1.88: 3.77; antennomere length/width: 1.59, 1.13, 1.42, 1.00, 1.03, 1.18, 1.28, 1.31, 1.43, 1.52, 1.77. In both sexes antennomeres 1–3 slightly widened apically; 4–10 distinctly serrate; 11 widest at about middle, acute at apex and not weakly divided by transverse impression; mandible about 1.9 times as long as wide; outer edge sharply curved at apical third, apex bidentate but with smaller tooth subapical; incisor edge simple; mola absent; prostheca consisting of a patch of short setae. Galea 1.2 times as long as wide, widest near broadly rounded apex, densely setose; lacinia slightly shorter than and 0.2 times as wide as galea, subacute apically; first maxillary palpomere in male 1.5 times as long as wide and slightly shorter than second, which is 0.87 times as long as wide; third palpomere about twice as long as second, more or less globular and deeply excavate and fourth palpomere 1.5 times as long as third, 4.3 times as long as wide and narrowly rounded apically; palp organ relatively complex, with at least 8 primary lobes and numerous secondary lobes. Ratio of palpomere lengths in female 1.00: 3.60: 2.80: 5.60; apical palpomere 2.67 times as long as wide, widest near apex, which is obliquely truncate. Mentum 0.6 times as long as wide, widest at truncate apex; ligula longer than mentum, widest at apex, which is slightly emarginate; labials palps separated by slightly less than the basal width of one; ratio of palpomere lengths 1.00: 2.60: 3.80; apical palpomere 2.09 time as long as wide, widest subapically, with obliquely truncate apex. Submentum elongate, not clearly separated from gula; gular sutures slightly converging anteriorly. Cervical sclerites divided, anterior plate about twice as long as posterior one, each broadly curved at each end and distinctly concave in middle. Pronotum ( +Figs 9–10 +) 1.10–1.30 (1.20) times as long as wide, widest at posterior fifth; sides slightly curved, continuous with broadly curved anterior edge, so that anterior angles are absent; posterior angles subright with rounded tips; posterior edge weakly biemar-ginate; lateral margins slightly explanate and somewhat elevated, extending onto anterior edge; disc finely and densely punctate ( +Fig. 6 +), punctures usually separated by less than half a puncture diameter and bearing moderately long setae, usually decumbent but suberect in places; interspaces relatively smooth and shiny. Prosternum 1.33 times as long as mid length of procoxal cavity, slightly, evenly convex, with straight, complete notosternal sutures. Prosternal process very short, broad at base, narrowing to subacute apex. Procoxal cavities large and broadly open externally and internally, with small notch at base of notosternal suture; postcoxal (hypomeral) process very short and angulate; protrochantin reduced but externally visible, more or less trapezoidal; endopleuron short, broadly expanded at apex. Scutellum 0.8 times as long as wide, not elevated posteriorly, without sub-basal curved carina, with sides slightly converging to subtruncate apex, distinctly separated from scutum, which has median endocarina. Elytra 3.10–4.08 (3.62) times as long as wide and 3.11–4.08 (4.13) times as long as pronotum, with sides subparallel or slightly wider behind middle, outer angles more or less rounded and apices independently narrowly rounded but narrowly separated; humeri weakly developed; disc with four very weak, longitudinal costae; punctation very fine, moderately dense and confused, punctures usually separated by more than a puncture diameter and bearing a decumbent seta; interspaces moderately sculptured and somewhat shiny. Mesoventrite triangular, 0.95 times as long as wide, widest at posterior end and gradually narrowed to anterior end which is very narrow and truncate, separating the broad mesanepisternal coxal rests; anterior portion of mesoventrite with pair of longitudinal, converging ridges extending from the posterior end of each coxal rest to the apex and joined at about middle by a transverse, slightly curved ridge. Posterior edge of mesoventrite forming a short, apically acute intercoxal process. Mesocoxal cavities large, weakly impressed, almost completely contiguous, broadly closed laterally by the mesepimeron; trochantin visible, small, irregularly quadrangular. Metaventrite 1.44 times as long as wide, strongly convex, longest at midline, with discrimen extending anteriorly almost to the posterior edges of the mesocoxal cavities; posterior edges of metaventrite on either side of discrimen straight but strongly oblique, extending from posterior edge of metanepisternum on each side posteromesally to a small, cleft, mesal projection adjacent to base of discrimen. Metanepisernum 12 times as long as wide, widest anteriorly, sides narrowed to narrowly truncate apex. Metendosternite with very long stalk, paired, elongate-oval laminae about twice as long as wide, slender lateral arms extending dorsally and a pair of anterior tendons arising from the mesal edges of the laminae. Hind wing about 2.4 times long as wide; apical field 0.43 times as long as wing length, with three linear sclerites forming an irregular epsilon: anterior oblique moderately thick sclerite, more slender posterior oblique sclerite and median, slender, vein-like sclerite; another lightly pigmented triangular sclerite at the base of the others and crossing the r4 cross-vein. Radial cell about 0.10 times wing length, 3.7 times as long as wide, with curved, oblique base forming an inner posterobasal angle of about 120°; cross-vein r3 absent, r4 moderately long and straight; radio-medial loop forming a 45° angle with apex of MP +1+2 +and basal portion of RP extending to about midwing. MP +1+2 +strongly developed, with medial spur straight, extending to wing margin. MP +3+4 +undivided and extending to wing margin, basally with short, oblique cross-vein and very short basal stub. CuP meeting AA +3 +without forming wedge cell, giving rise to CuA +1+2 +, which is moderately long, oblique and forked to form short CuA +1 +meeting MP +3+4 +and a long CuA +2 +extending to wing margin; AA +4 +extending almost to wing margin. Anal lobe well-developed, without embayment, with only one vein (AP +3+4 +). Procoxa 3.1 times as long as wide, widest near base and slightly narrowed to apex, strongly projecting. Mesocoxa 1.8 times as long as wide, widest near base and narrowed apically, slightly projecting near midline. Metacoxa 3.12 times as long as wide, strongly oblique and slightly projecting near midline, with very short, curved coxal cowling, a long, sinuate line occupying almost entire width and a straight groove and internal ridge. Profemur 3.07 times as long as wide; protibia 9.2 times as long as wide; protarsi about 0.72 times as long as tibia, with segment lengths 3.43: 1.43: 1.14: 1.00: 2.57. Mesofemur 3.56 times as long as wide; mesotibia about 15.5 times as long as wide, slightly narrower at base than apex; mesotarsi about 0.84 times as long as tibia, with segment lengths 4.14: 2.00: 1.57: 1.00: 1.57. Metafemur, metatibia and metatarsi similar to those of midleg. Pretarsal claws moderately long and slender with relatively small, bisetose empodium. Abdomen with first ventrite about 0.7 times as long as second, ventrites 2–4 equal in length and 5 slightly shorter than 4 and broadly rounded; intercoxal process on ventrite 1 very short and angulate, continued internally as a median carina separating metacoxae; concealed sternite II well-developed, with median carina; abdominal tergite VII (pygidium) 1.66 times as long as wide, widest at base, with sides gradually converging to broadly rounded apex and lined with pair of sublateral struts extending almost to apex. Abdominal sternite VIII in male about as long as wide; sides subparallel basally, then converging to broadly rounded apex; tergite VIII 1.48 times as long as wide; sides subparallel at base and converging to narrowly rounded apex; disc with a narrow, longitudinal translucent area at middle. Segment IX in male 1.87 times as long as wide, widest at apical third, apex deeply emarginate to form two rounded lobes; pregenital ring broadly rounded anteriorly; posteriorly segment X not clearly separated from IX. Aedeagus normally oriented, with tegmen dorsal to penis; basale 0.80 times as long as apicale and 1.67 times as long as wide in dorsal view, with narrowly rounded base; widest at basal fourth with sides beyond this point subparallel; apex almost completely fused to apicale, except apicolaterally where there are small condyles; apicale 1.85 times as long as wide, sides subparallel basally, diverging beyond middle than converging subapically; apex deeply emarginate forming pair of broad, mesally curved, apically rounded, setose parameroids; base of apicale with pair of broad tegminal struts extending anteriorly and mesally to join at midline near base of penis. Penis about as long as tegmen, 15 times as long as wide, distinctly curved ventrally, its base with broad, median, oblique, ventral projection attached to tegminal struts. Ovipositor about 8 times as long as wide, with distinct proctigeral, paraproctal and coxital bacula; paraprocts 1.5 times as long as gonocoxites, which are 3.0 times as long as combined width; each gonocoxite subdivided into a basal lobe about twice as long as wide and lightly sclerotised with heavily sclerotised oblique baculum and apical lobe, which is 2.7 times as long as basal lobe, 10 times as long as wide, parallel-sided, densely setose and narrowly rounded at apex; apical lobes relaively widely separated and parallel; gonostylus 0.12 times as long as gonocoxite, 5 times as long as wide, slightly expanded apically and setose. + + +Types +: + + +Holotype + +, ♁ “ +18.55S +149.09E +QLD +Mt. Spec. +S3 + +880m + + +6 Dec. 1994 + +– + +10 Jan. 1995 + +M. Cermak F I Trap +JCU + +5 m + +” ( +ANIC #25-075148 +) + + + + + +Paratypes + +: + +QLD +: + +Bald Mtn. Area +, + +3-4000 ft. + +, via Emu Vale, + +22–27.ii.1971 + +, +L. Hill +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Bartle Frere +, +West Base +( +17°23’S +, +145°46’E +), + +50m + +, + +25.xi.1994 + +– + +10.i.1995 + +, +flight intercept trap +, +Monteith +& +Hasenpusch +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Bartle Frere +, +West Base +( +17°23’S +, +145°46’E +), + +700m + +, + +10.i.–31.iii.1995 + +, +flight intercept trap +, +Monteith +& +Hasenpusch +( +2♀♀ +, +QMB +; +1♀ +, +GS +, +ANIC +); + + +Bartle Frere +, +West Base +( +17°23’S +, +145°46’E +), + +700m + +, + +7.iii.–5.v.1995 + +, +flight intercept traps +, +Monteith +& +Hasenpusch +( +4♀ ♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Boggom +, via +Taroom +( +25°27’S +, +150°08’E +), + +13.xi.1996 + +, at light, +G. B. Monteith +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Charmillan Ck. Xing, +Tully Falls Road +, + +950m + +, + +8.xii.1989 + +– + +5.i.1990 + +, +pitfall +& +intercept traps +, +Monteith +, +Thompson +& +Janetski +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Davies Creek Rd. +, + +20 km +ESE Mareeba + +, + +750m + +, + +4–13.xii.1988 + +, +flight intercept trap +, +Monteith +& +Thompson +( +2♀♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Hugh Nelson Range +, + +2.5 km + +S of Cra-ter N.P., + +1100m + +, + +5–14.xii.1988 + +, +flight intercept trap +, +Monteith +& +Thompson +( +3♀♀ +, +QMB +); + + + +Hughes Road, Topaz (17°26. +S + +, +145°42’E +), + +650m + +, + +6.xii.1993 + +– + +25.ii.1994 + +, +RF +intercept, +Monteith +, +Cook +, +Janetzki +( +6♀♀ +, +QMB +); + + +KarnakDevil’s Thumb +, + +8–12 km +NW Mossman + +, +Site + +4, 300m + +, + +26.xii.1989 + +– + +15.i.1990 + +, flt. +Intercept +, ANZSES +Expedition +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Kenny Road +( +17°28’S +, +145°32’E +), + +850m + +, + +8.xii.1990 + +– + +5.ii.1991 + +, +flight intercept trap +, +Monteith +& +Seymour +( +2♀♀ +, +QMB +); + + + +Mossman +Bluff Track + +, + +5–10 km +W Mossman + +, +Site + +4, 600m + +, + +20.xii.1989 + +– + +15.i.1990 + +, flight +intercept +, +Monteith +, +Thompson +, ANZSES ( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + + +Mossman +Bluff Track + +, + +5–10 km +W Mossman + +, +Site + +5, 760m + +, + +16–30.xii.1988 + +. flight +intercept +, +Monteith +, +Thompson +, ANZSES ( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + + +Mossman +Bluff Track + +, + +5–10 km +W Mossman + +, +Site +7, + +1000m + +, + +16–30.xii.1988 + +, flight +intercept +, +Monteith +, +Thompson +, ANZSES ( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Mt. Edith +( +17°06’S +, +145°37’E +) + +, + +GS2 +, +1050 +m, + +1.xii.1994 + +– + +3.i.1995 + +, +Malaise trap +, +P. Zborowski +(1♁, +ANIC +); + + +Mt. Fisher +( +17°33’S +, +145°32’E +), BS2, 1150m, + +4.ii–21.iii.1995 + +, +Malaise traps +, +P. Zborowski +(1♁, +ANIC +); + + +Mt. Huntley +( +28°08S +, +152°26E +), + +1250m + +, + +29–30.i.1993 + +, +G. B. Monteith +(1♁, +QMB +); + + +Mt. Lewis Rd. +, +22 km +from +Highway +, +Site +3, + +1000m + +, + +18.xii.1989 + +– + +13.i.1990 + +, flight +intercept +, +Monteith +, +Thompson +, ANZSES ( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Mt. Lewis Rd. +, +11 km +from +Highway +, +Site +1, + +1000m + +, + +18.xii.1989 + +– + +13.i.1990 + +, flight +intercept +, +Monteith +, +Thompson +, ANZSES (1♁, +QMB +); + + +Mt. Massey Creek +( +17°37S +, +145°34E +), BS3, + +1000m + +, + +1.xii.1994 + +– + +3.i.1995 + +, +flight intercept trap +. JCU (West), +P. Zborowski +(1♁, +ANIC +); + + +Mt. Misery Summit +( +15°52’S +, +145.14’E +), +Site + +2, 850m + +, + +16.xii.1990 + +– + +17.i.1991 + +, Flight +intercept + +, + +QLD +Mus. & ANZSES ( +3♀♀ +, +QMB +,); + +Mt. Spec +, S + +3 ( +18°55’S +, +146°09’E +), + +880m + +, + +6.xii.1994 + +– + +10.i.1995 + +, +flight intercept traps +, +M. Cermak +(8♁♁, +7♀♀ +, +ANIC +); + + + +Mt. Spec +, S + +3 ( +18°55’S +, +146°09’E +), + +880m + +, + +10.i.–6.ii.1995 + +, +flight intercept traps +, +M. Cermak +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); + + +Mt. Spec, S3 ( +18°55’S +, +146°09’E +), + +880m + +, + +6.ii–9.iii.1995 + +, +flight intercept traps +, +M. Cermak +(7♁♁, +12♀♀ +, +ANIC +); + + +Mt. Spec, S2 ( +18°55’S +, +146°10’E +), + +880m + +, + +9.iii–6.iv.1995 + +, +flight intercept traps +, +M. Cermak +(1♁, +1♀ +, +ANIC +); + + +Paluma Dam Rd. Site + +4, 750m + +, + +17.xi–8.xii.1990 + +, +flight intercept trap +, Monteith & Sey-mour (1♁, +QMB +); + + +Paluma Dam Rd. Site + +4, 750m + +, + +8.xii.1990 + +– + +5.ii.1991 + +, +flight intercept trap +, +Monteith +& +Seymour +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Paluma Dam Rd. Site + +5, 850m + +, + +8.xii.1990 + +– + +5.ii.1991 + +, +flight intercept trap +, +Monteith +& +Seymour +( +3♀♀ +, +QMB +); + + +South Koombooloomba Dam +, + +1.5 km +N Tully River Xing + +, + +750m + +, + +8xii.1989 + +– + +5.i.1990 + +, +pitfall +& +intercept traps +, Monteith, Thompson, Janetski (1♁, +12♀♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Stone Creek +(Hasenpusch) (17.28’ +S +, 146.01’ +E +), + +100m + +, + +1.x–1.xi.1995 + +, +intercept trap +, +J. Hasenpusch +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Tower nr. The Crater NP ( +17°27’S +, +145°29’E +), + +1230m + +, + +10.i.1995 + +– + +31.iii.1996 + +, +FIT intercept trap +, +Monteith +& +Hasenpusch +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Tully +, + +11 km + +NNW, +Upper Boulder Ck. +, + +850m + +, + +16–19.xi.1984 + +, Cook, Monteith, Thompson ( +1♀ +, +QMB +); + + +Westcott Rd. +, Topaz ( +17°24’S +, +145°41’E +), + +680m + +, + +6.xii.1993 + +– + +25.ii.1994 + +, +intercept +, Monteith, Cook, Janetzki ( +1♀ +, +QMB +); Windsor Tableland, site 1, + +27.i.1988 + +– + +10.i.1989 + +, flight +intercept +, +E. Schmidt +& ANZSES ( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +. + + + + +Distribution. +The species is restricted to +Queensland +, with records from Mt. Huntley in Main Range National Park, close to the +New South Wales +border north at least to Mt. Misery near Cooktown. + + + + +Biology. +Nothing is known on the biology of this species. Adults are usually collected in flight intercept traps or Malaise traps. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00E5D72FF4694F1700CFD59.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00E5D72FF4694F1700CFD59.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..081804b9e75 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00E5D72FF4694F1700CFD59.xml @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Australymexylon +Wheeler, 1986 + + + + + +( +Wheeler, 1986 +, figs 188–215) + + + + + + + +Australymexylon +Wheeler, 1986: 160 + + +. + + + + +Type +species: + +Lymexylon australis +Erichson, 1842 + +, by original designation. + + + + + +Diagnosis +. + +Australymexylon + +species differ from other +Melittommatinae +in lacking a maxillary palp organ in both sexes, base of pronotum with pair of small deep impressions, elytra lying flat over abdomen (with incomplete interlocking mechanism), scutellum not separated from scutum, and males with paired setose pads on sternite VIII. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00E5D72FF46965E7122FA3A.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00E5D72FF46965E7122FA3A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b4be97a551b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00E5D72FF46965E7122FA3A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,373 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Australymexylon australe +(Erichson) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 21 +) + + + + + +Lymexulon australis +Erichson, 1842: 147 + +. +Type +, +♀ +, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin. Examined by +Wheeler (1986) +. + +Hylecoetus linearis +Lea, 1894: 803 + +. +Type +, SAM. Examined by +Wheeler (1986) +. + + + +Lymexylon adelaidae +Blackburn, 1898: 34 + +. +Type +, SAM. Examined by +Wheeler (1986) +. + + + + +Diagnosis +. + +Australymexylon australe + +differs from + +A. fuscipennis + +in its much darker colour, weakly serrate male antenna, males with larger setose pads on segment VIII and penis about as long as basale and apicale combined. + + +Specimens examined. TAS: + +Bronte Park +, +12 km +NNE ( +42°02’S +, +146°33’E +). + +20.i.1983 + +, +J. Cardale +(3♁♁, +ANIC +) + +; + +Liffey Valley +, + +11.ii.1987 + +, +S. Fearn +(1, +ANIC +) + +; + +Mt. Field Nat. Park +( +42°41’S +, +146°43’E +), + +160–240m + +, + +30.i–4.ii.1980 + +, on bark surface, +J. Lawrence +, +T +. +Weir +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Mt. +Nelson +, +Hobart +, + +100m + +, + +6.ii.1982 + +, at light, +G. Bornemissza +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +St. Patrick’s +R +., + +5.ii.1914 + +, +A. H. Elston +(1♁, +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +VIC: +Cape Conran Coastal Park +, + +24 km +SE Orbost + +( +37°47’S +, +148°44’E +), + +12.i–13.ii.2005 + +, +C. Lambkin. N. Starick +(1♁?, +ANIC +) + +; + +Halls Gap +, +3 km +S, +Grampians Nat. Park +( +37°25’S +, +142°29’E +), + +250m + +, +6.ii./1997 +, +D. C. F. Rentz +, +D., E. S. Ross +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Little Boys Camp area +, + +25.i.1940 + +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Lorne +, + +25.i.1959 + +, +B. P. Moore +(1?, +ANIC +) + +; + +North +Cascade +Camp +, + +25.i.1940 + +, + +Eucalyptus regnans + +( +1♀ +GS +, +ANIC +) + +; + + +NSW +: + +Blacktown +, +Sydney +, + +17.xi.1980 + +, +R +. +De Keyzer +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Gloucester Tops +, + +17.i.1979 + +, +C. N. Smithers +( +1♀ +. +AMS +) + +; + +Lord Howe Island +, +Cowan Track +, + +400m + +, before end on right, +33°39’14”S +, +151°10’’19”E +), + +3.xii.2000 + +, +Flight +int. trap, +SLASS1 +.int27, +S. A. Lassau +(1♁, +AMS +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00E5D73FF4690BA70F4FA56.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00E5D73FF4690BA70F4FA56.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a43605814f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00E5D73FF4690BA70F4FA56.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1322 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Australymexylon fuscipennis +(Lea) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 20 +) + + + + + + + +Hylecoetus fuscipennis +Lea, 1912: 466 + + +. +Type +, +♀ +, SAM. Examined by +Wheeler (1986) +. + + + + + +Diagnosis +. + +Australymexylon fuscipennis + +differs from + +A. australe + +in its lighter colour, especially at the elytral bases and males with strongly serrate antenna, smaller setose pads on segment VIII and much smaller penis. + + +Specimens examined. + + +QLD +: + +Bald Mtn.Area +, via +Emu Vale +, 3-4000’, + +22–27.i.1971 + +, +G. B. Monteith +, etc. (2♁♁, +8♀♀ +, +QMB +); +Bald Mtn. area +, via +Emuvale +, + +3-4000 ft. + +, + +22–27.i.1972 + +, +L. Hill +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +); +Bald Mtn. Area +, via +Emu Vale +, 3-4000;, + +26–30.i.1973 + + +, + +T +. +Spencer +( +1♀ +, +QMB +); +Bald Mtn. Area +, via +Emu Vale +, 3500–4000’, + +26–30.i.1973 + +, +I. D. Naumann +(1, +QMB +) + +; + + + +Brisbane +, x–xi.1957, 1961, W. +Haseler +( +4♀♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Cooloola +, +Freshwater Rd. +, rainforest, + +9.xi.1974 + +, G. Mon- teith ( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Glen Alpin +, + +4–8.x.1964 + +, P. +Kerridge +( +1♀ +, Q! +MB +) + +; + +Inglewood +, + +1.ii.1954 + +, +R +. +J. Turner +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Middle +ridge, + +27.xi.1962 + +, A. +Macqueen +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Mt. Moffat +(24.57’S, 148.02’E), +Mahogany Forest +, + +1000m + +, + +26.ix–26.xi.1995 + +, +intercept +, G. B. +Monteith +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +National Park +, + +xii.1919 + +, H. +Hacker +(1♁, +2♀♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Stan-thorpe +Dr. +, + +xi.1919 + +, H. +Jarvis +( +1♀ +, +QDAF +) + +; + +Toowoomba +, +R +. +Illidge +( +1♀ +, +QMB +). + +NSW +: + +Arrawarra +, + +xii.1961 + +, +C. W. Frazier +( +3♀♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Barrington House +, via +Salisbury +, + +26–28.xii.1965 + +, B. +Cantrell +(2♁♁, +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Barrington Tops N. P. +, +Cobark Forest Area +, + +16–17.i.1996 + +, +M. J. Fletcher +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +Barrington Tops N. P. +, +Upper Williams River +, + +550m + +, + +26.i.1987 + +, +R +. +De Keyzer +( +2♀♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Bawley Point +( +30°30’S +, +150°24’E +), + +30.xii.1997 + +, D. C. F. +Rentz +( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Beaucroft +, + +10.i.1968 + +, O. M. +Williams +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +Blue Mts. +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Bombala +, +Bondi State For. +, + +iii.1984 + +, +Ipsenol +tra, +Pinus +radiata, D. M. +Campbell +(1♁, +ASCU +) + +; + +Buccleuch +St. For. +, +Black Andrew +, 26.i, + +28. ii.2007 + +, I. +Hides +(1♁, +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +Chichester State For. +, via +Dungog +, + +25.xii.1965 + +, +T +. +Weir, B +. +Cantrell +( +2♀♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Congo +, + +xii.1979 + +– + +i.1980 + +, M. S. +Upton +(3♁♁, +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Copeland Tops Forest Rd. +, +19 km +from +Gloucester +, + +4.i.1982 + +, E. B. +Britton +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Cutler’s Pass +, near, + +1250 ft. + +, + +i.1943 + +, A. +Musgrave +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Cumberland Nat. For. +, + +10.i.1988 + +, +light trap +, D. S. +Kent +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +Dingo Tops Forest +Park, +NW of Wingham +, + +8.i.1984 + +, +G. Williams +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Dorrigo +, W. +Heron +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Durras +, + +i.1939 + +, G. F. +Hill +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Greenwich +, + +xii.1970 + +, P. +Zborowski +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Gundaroo Road +property “Calosoma”, + +4.iii.1977 + +, B. P. +Moore +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Jerilderie +, + +1.ii.1970 + +, H. +Burton +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Jindabyne +( +36°25’S +, +148°.37’E +), + +920m + +, + +7.ii.1993 + +, +UV +blacklight, +A. Newton +, +M. Thayer +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Lansdowne +, +3 km +N via +Taree +, + +3.xii.1988 + +, wet forest complex, +UV +light, +G. Williams +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Lansdowne +, +3 km +N via +Taree +, + +4.i.1989 + +, +UV +light at rainforest margin, +G. Williams +( +1♀ +, +AMS +, +K517751 +) + +; + +McCarr’s Creek +, Ku-ring-gai +Chase +, + +31.xii.1970 + +, M lamp, D. K. +McAlpine +(1♁, +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Middle Brother St. +For, +Bird Tree +, + +23.xi.2001 + +, +MV +light, +D. Britton +, +B. Walsh +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Mt. Kaputar Plateau +, +Mt. Kaputar +N. P., +NE of Narrabri +, + +11.i.1989 + +, on +Acacia +foliage, +G. Williams +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Narara +, + +24.xii.1949 + +, I. +Mosse-Robinson +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +Narara +, + +2.i.1950 + +, I. +Mosse-Robinson +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +Narrabri +Ag. Res. Sta., + +24.ii.1966 + +, +W. E. Wright +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +Nepean River +, + +xii.1922 + +, A. +Musgrave +, +T +. +Campbell +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Queanbeyan +, +2.7 km +NE, + +670m + +, + +30.i.1980 + +, I. F. B. +Common +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Richmond +, + +3.iii.1993 + +, C. +Carr +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +Royal Nat. Park +, + +28.xii.1970 + +, +MV +lamp, +D. K. McAlpine +( +1♀ +, +AMS +, +K517727 +) + +; + +Rydalmere +, + +xii.1976 + +, +light trap +, G. +R +. +Brown +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +Starr’s Creek +, +Lansdowne +, + +23.xii.1990 + +, +S. G. Watkins +( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Tooloom Plateau +, via +Urbenville +, + +16–17.xii.1972 + +, I. +Naumann +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +“ +Tuglo +”, + +48 km +N of Singleton + +, 1.i, + +16.xii.1977 +, +20.xii.1980 + +C. N. +Smithers +( +4♀♀ +, +AMS +, +K517745–48 +) + +; + +Upper Colo +, + +1.i.1979 + +, at +UV +light, +D. P. Carne +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Upper Horseshoe Creek +, near +Kyogle +, + +24.xi.1986 + +, at black light, D. J. +Scambler +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Wauchope +, +72 km +W on +Oxley Hwy. +( +31°27’S +, +152°44’E +), + +4.i.1970 + +, at light, +Britton +, +Holloway +, +Misko +(1♁, +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Westleigh +, +Sydney +, + +15.xii.1986 + +, at light, G. A. +Webb +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +West Pennant Hills +, + +3.i.1984 + +, +light trap +, +E. E. Taylor +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +West Pimble +, near +Sydney +, 1984, D. J. +Scambler +( +2♀♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +West Pimble +, near +Sydney +, + +22.xii.1986 + +, at black light, D. J. +Scambler +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +West Pimble +, near +Sydney +, + +10.xii.1987 + +, at black light, D. J. +Scambler +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Wedderburn +, +3 km +E ( +34°08’S +, +150°49’E +), 16,21. + +xii.2005 + +, at +MV +light, +D. Britton +(1♁, +6♀♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Wedderburn +, +3 km +E ( +34°08’S +, +150°49’E +), + +1.i.2011 + +, at +MV +lamp, D. +R +. +Britton, K +. +Hill +(1♁, +2♀♀ +, +AMS +,) + +; + +Yarras +, +Yarras Timber Mill +, ii & + +xi.1964 + +, M. +V +. +light trap +, +M. Thompson +( +4♀♀ +, +ASCU +) + +. + +VIC: +Cann River +, + +20.i.1967 + +, +G. Monteith +( +4♀♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Hall’s Gap +, +31 km +S, +Grampians Nat. Park +(37.25’S, 142.29’E), + +250m + +, + +6.ii.1997 + +, +D. C. F. Rentz +, E. S. +Ross +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Valencia Creek +, +10 mi. +N via +Maffra +, +River Crossing +, + +1.i.1966 + +, +T +. +Weir +( +2♀♀ +, +QMB +) + +. + +ACT: +Black Mtn. +, + +18.ii.1951 + +, P. B. +Carne +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Lyneham +, +Canberra +, 1.1964, at light, +B. P. Moore +(1♁, +ANIC +). + +SA +: + +Coorong +, + +25.xii.1928 + +, +A. H. Elston +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Inglewood +, nr. +Adelaide +, + +24.xi.1984 + +, G. +R +. +Brown +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +Mt. Lofty Rgs. +, A. H. +Elston +(( +1♀ +, +AMS +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00F5D7CFF4693507040FEF4.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00F5D7CFF4693507040FEF4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..89b3e28c834 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A00F5D7CFF4693507040FEF4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Melittomma +Murray, 1867 + + + + + +( +Wheeler, 1986 +, figs 225–267) + + + + + + + +Melittomma +Murray, 1867: 314 + + +. + + + + +Type +species: + +Hylecoetus brasiliensis +Laporte 1832 + +, by original designation. + + + + + + + +Neohylecoetus +Kurosawa, 1956: 80 + + +. +Type +species: + + +N. javanus +Kurosawa, 1956: 81 + + +(= + +Hylecoetus javanicus +Chevrolat, 1829 + +; + +Neohylecoetus philippensis +Kurosawa, 1956 + +). +Kurosawa, 1985 +(synonymy). + + + + +Diagnosis +. According to +Wheeler (1986) +, adults of the genus + +Melittomma + +may be distinguished from other members of the family by having large, often proximal eyes, palp organs in the male, entire or almost entire elyra, appendiculate paratergites on abdominal segment IX and small parameroids, while lacking setose pads on segment VIII in the male. Larvae may be distinguished by the presence of a heavily sclerotised abdominal apex terminating in a concavity lined by a deeply notched ridge. Adults of + +Australymexylon + +species differ in lacking palp organs and having setose pads on segment VIII in the male, while + +Alcestoma + +species lack the appendiculate paratergites on segment IX and have more elongate parameroids. + + +Note +. The genus + +Melittomma + +currently contains about 20 species worldwide, but it is not clear if all of these species share the diagnostic features mentioned above. +Wheeler (1986) +moved + +M. insulare +Fairmaire (1893) + +and + +M. curtipenne +Pic (1939) + +to the genus + +Protomelittomma +Wheeler + +(= + +Alcestoma +Fairmaire + +) and considered them to be synonymous, but some + +Melittomma + +types +were not seen and some names were based on females only. This problem can only be addressed by those with access to the relevant +types +. The only true + +Melittomma + +occurring in +Australia +, based on male genital and pregenital features listed above, is + +M. pervagum + +, which is redescribed below. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0105D6CFF4695D070FCF98B.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0105D6CFF4695D070FCF98B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f399d62585a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0105D6CFF4695D070FCF98B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + +Key to the Genera and Species of +Lymexylidae +occurring in +Australia + + + + + + + + +1. Elytra covering abdomen or only slightly shortened; hind wings folded beneath elytra; maxillary palp organ absent or present in male only; antennae much longer than head width and more or less serrate..................... + +Melittommatinae + +... +2 + + + + +- Elytra very short, brachypterous, not reaching metacoxae and exposing all abdominal segments; hind wings exposed, without transverse folds; male and female with maxillary palp organ; antennae not or barely longer than head width and spindle-shaped (widest sub-basally and narrowing towards apex.............................................. + +Atractocerinae + +... +5 + + + + + + +2(1). Pronotum not or only slightly longer than wide, widest anteriorly with anterior edge slightly curved and side margins not extending onto apex; anterior pronotal angles obtuse but distinct; antennomeres 3–10 distinctly widened apically; notosternal suture weakly impressed and diagonal; abdominal segment IX in male with appendiculate paratergites; apicale much shorter than basale, apically emarginate but not completely divided; ovipositor with basal coxital lobes evenly, moderately heavily sclerotised, without bacula and with slender mesal projections extending to apex and separating membranous, densely setose apical lobes.................................................................. + + +Melittomma pervagum +(Olliff) + + + + + + +- Pronotum distinctly longer than wide, widest at or behind middle with anterior edge strongly curved and side margins more or less continuous with anterior margin; anterior pronotal angles absent; antennomeres 4–10 distinctly widened apically; notosternal sutures distinct and more or less parallel; abdominal segment IX in male without appendiculate paratergites; apicale subequal to or longer than basale, completely divided or not; ovipositor with basal coxital lobes lightly sclerotised, with distinct bacula and without anteromesal projections................................................................. +3 + + + + + + +3(2). Base of pronotum without or with broad, shallow impressions; elytral interlocking mechanism and epipleura more or less complete and abdominal apex usually concealed; scutellum at least slightly convex and separated by transverse ridge from scutum; maxillary palp organ present in male; abdominal sternite VIII in male without setose pads.................................................................................................... + + +Alcestoma queenslandicum + +sp. nov. + + + + + +- Base of pronotum with pair of small, relatively deep, sublateral impressions; elytral interlocking mechanism and epipleura incomplete, so that elytra beyond middle lie flat on abdomen with independently rounded apices exposing one or two abdominal tergites; scutellum flat or slightly concave, not separated from scutum; maxillary palp organ absent in both sexes; abdominal sternite VIII in male with pair of setose pads................................................ + +Australymexylon + +... +4 + + + + + + +4(3). Male antenna strongly serrate; female antenna serrate; penis much shorter than basale and apicale combined; abdominal segment VIII of male with small, round, ventral setose pads; colour almost always with evident pale spot at base of each elytron........................................................................ + + +Australymexylon fuscipennis +(Lea) + + + + + + +- Male antenna weakly serrate; female antenna scarcely so; penis as long as basale and apicale combined; abdominal segment VIII of male with large, oval setose pads, covering most of sternite and part of tergite; colour usually uniformly dark, reddishbrown to nearly black..................................................... + + +Australymxylon australe +(Erichson) + + + + + + + + +5 (1). Eyes larger, occupying almost entire frons, separated in frontal view by less than 0.05 times distance across both eyes..... +6 + + + + +- Eyes smaller, separated in frontal view by at least 0.15 times distance across both eyes.............................. +7 + + + + + + +6(5). Head smaller, longer than wide, somewhat horizontally produced, distinctly narrower than pronotum; eyes elongate-oval, their long axis at an angle of about 30º to long axis of head; elytra much shorter than prothorax; northwestern +Australia +................................................................................... + + +Atractocerus crassicornis +Clark + + + + + + +- Head larger, wider than long, rather vertical, at least as wide as anterior edge of pronotum; eyes more diagonal, their long axis at an angle of about 45º to long axis of head; elytra longer than prothorax; southern +Australia +.................................................................................................... + + +Raractocetus kreusleri +(Pascoe) + + + + + + + + +7 (5). Pronotum subquadrate, not longer than wide; head distinctly declined with vertex somewhat flattened and abruptly declined posteriorly, without median groove; antennae 11-segmented; eyes in frontal view separated by distance about equal to width of one eye in same view; meso- and metatarsi not longer than their respective tibiae; hindwings relatively darkly pigmented, with metallic sheen; northern QLD............................................................... + + +Arractocetus + +sp. + + + + + +- Pronotum distinctly longer than wide; head less declined with vertex convex, usually with median groove; antennae 12-segmented; eyes in frontal view separated by distance less than 0.7 times width of one eye in same view; meso- and metatarsi much longer than their respective tibiae; hindwings hyaline, without metallic sheen; southern +Australia +............................................................................................. + + +Leptonetron victoriense +(Blackburn) + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0185D64FF46937074C0F860.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0185D64FF46937074C0F860.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c85b4fcf89d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0185D64FF46937074C0F860.xml @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Raractocetus +Kurosawa, 1985 + + + + + + + + + + +Raractocetus +Kurosawa, 1985: 111 + + +. + + + + +Type +species: + +Atractocerus emarginatus +Laporte, 1836 + +(original designation). + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Species of the genus + +Raractocetus + +differ from those of + +Arractocetus +Kurasawa + +, + +Fuscicornis +Philippi + +and + +Hymaloxylon +Kurosawa + +and + +Leptonetron + +gen. nov. +in having the eyes very large and contiguous (male) or subcontiguous (female) in frontal view. + +Raractocetus + +is distinguished from + +Atractocerus + +by the larger, shorter and more vertically oriented head, as wide as or wider than the anterior pronotal margin, more robust antennae and shorter elytra. A male from Barro Colorado Island, +Panama +fits the description of + +Atractocerus procerus +Schenkling (1914) + +and has the head characters of + +Raractocetus + +, but + +A. procerus + +cannot be transferred to + +Raractocetus + +without examination of the +type +. If this specimen does belong to + +A. procerus + +, then the Neotropical species differs from both + +R. emarginatus + +and + +R. kreusleri + +in having a median groove behind the eyes and a median groove extending the entire length of the pronotum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0195D67FF4695D077ECF82B.xml b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0195D67FF4695D077ECF82B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7fbe2c210e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/35/BF/3735BF36A0195D67FF4695D077ECF82B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1231 @@ + + + +The Australian Lymexylidae (Coleoptera: Tenerionoidea) with one new genus and two genera new to Australia + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-12-15 + + +4895 + + +2 + + +211 +238 + + + +journal article +9277 +10.11646/zootaxa.4895.2.3 +020059ec-0af5-44c5-8eb0-6a2874d9197d +1175-5326 +4322473 +77117CFB-AD8E-4066-819F-FA81D3D589B7 + + + + + + + +Raractocetus kreusleri +(Pascoe, 1864) + + + + +(Figs 12, 17) + + + + +Atractocerus kreusleri +Pascoe, 1864: 46 + +. +Type +, + + + + +Diagnosis. +This species is slenderer and much darker in colour than + +R. emarginatus + +and has a short median pronotal groove. + + + + +Redescription. +Colour of head behind eyes and pronotum dark brown to black, elytra yellowish-brown, more or less unicoloured; exposed tergites reddish-brown; undersurfaces reddish-brown to dark brown; eyes and palporgan black. Vestiture of short, dense, yellow or pale hairs. Length: males 14–25 (1.89 – 2.8) mm (n = 15); females 16–35 (26.6 – 4.1) mm (n = 35). Body length/elytral width 9.95–13.90 (11.78). Head 1.61 times as long as wide, somewhat declined, gradually narrowed behind eyes, without temples or neck; base weakly biemarginate dorsally, surface evenly convex. Eye about as long as head width and as long as wide, strongly protruding with anterior edge emarginate, finely facetted but ocellate, with interfacetal setae slightly longer than width of an eye facet; distance between eyes dorsally 0.05 times distance across them in male and and 0.1 times in female; distance between eyes ventrally about 0.25 times distance across them in both sexes. Antennal insertions concealed by frontal ridges which extend into eye emargination. Clypeus 0.38 times as long as wide, with sides curved and converging to broadly emarginate apex. Labrum 0.6 times as wide as clypeus, 0.5 times as long as wide, with sides strongly curved, apex broadly rounded and disc densely setose with longest setae anteromesally. Antennae in male 1.6 times as long as head width, 11-segmented; ratio of antennomere lengths: 2.40: 1.90: 2.00: 1.60: 1.50: 1.30: 1.20:1.10: 1.10: 1.00: 4.00; antennomere length/width ratios: 1.26, 1.00, 1.18, 1.07, 1.15, 1.18, 1.33, 1.57, 1.83, 1.67, 6.67. Antennae in female 2.27 times as long as head width, 12-segmented; ratio of antennomere lengths 1.35, 1.00, 1.40, 1.30, 1.30, 1.25, 1.20, 1.05, 1.05, 1.00, 0.95; 1.00; antennomere length/width ratios: 1.42: 1.00: 1.22: 1.08: 1.13: 1.14: 1.20:1.10: 1.17: 1.43: 1.58, 3.33; terminal antennomere acute at apex. Mandible about 1.36 times as long as wide; outer edge gradually curved and densely setose; apex bidentate with dorsal lobe distinctly longer than ventral one; mola and prostheca absent. Maxilla with galea 2.33 times as long as wide, parallel-sided, broadly rounded apically; lacinia shorter than galea, 2.75 times as long as wide with narrowly rounded apex; maxillary palp in male with first palpomere half as long as wide and much shorter than others; second and third palpomeres obliquely connate forming a globular structure 1.2 times as long as wide, fourth long and slender with narrowly rounded apex; palp organ with about 13 major branches and numerous secondary ones; in female four palpomeres more or less similar to those in male and palp organ with about 8 major branches and numerous secondary ones. Mentum 0.5 times as long as wide, broadly rounded at base and subtruncate at apex; ligula membranous, slightly longer than labial palp and narrowly rounded apex. labial palps 2-segmented with large palpigers, separated by much less than basal width of one; basal palpomere 0.33 times as long as wide and apical palpomere more than 10 times as long as basal one, 2.5 times as long as wide, parallel-sided and flattened, with truncate apex. Submental peduncle strongly transverse, with truncate apex and paired, slightly diverging, narrowly rounded anterolateral lobes, not separated from gular region; gular sutures subparallel; gula slightly shorter than wide. Ventral surface of head slightly biconcave, with short subantennal grooves. Cervical sclerites 2.7 times as long as wide, slightly constricted at middle with posterior half wider than anterior half. Pronotum 1.06–1.20 (1.12) times as long as wide, barely wider at posterior fourth with sides more or less parallel, without lateral carinae; anterior edge strongly rounded; anterior angles absent, posterior angles more or less right; posterior edge weakly emarginate on either side of very short, broad, prescutellar lobe slightly concave at apex; disc moderately steeply sloped laterally and flattened mesally, with median longitudinal groove and endocarina just behind middle; punctation fine and dense, vestiture of inclined or suberect fine hairs. Prosternum about 0.6 times as long as mid length of a procoxal cavity, anteriorly deeply emarginate; surface relatively flat; notosternal sutures oblique. Prosternal process apparently short, broad and apically truncate (possibly absent, if apparent process represents floor of sternum). Procoxal cavities large and broadly open externally and internally, of an unusual shape, with anterior edge strongly oblique, with small anterolateral notch at base of notosternal suture; postcoxal process absent; protrochantin well-developed, externally visible, transverse, mesally slender and laterally subtriangular. Scutellum virtually absent, consisting of a short strip of cuticle weakly bilobed at apex, not separated from scutum, which has a complete median endocarina and is concave laterally to house sub-basal portions of elytra. Elytra 1.69–2.00 (1.81) times as long as greatest combined width and 1.63–2.00 (1.84) times as long as pronotum; separated for most of their lengths, but meeting at anterior sixth; each elytron about 3.5 times as long as wide, wid-est at anterior fifth, with outer edge straight and oblique anteriorly, interlocking with lateral scutal groove, weakly curved posteriorly, inner edge more or less sinuate and apex very broadly rounded; humeri and anterolateral angles absent; punctation fine, confused and bearing short, inclined hairs. Mesoventrite highly reduced, infolded and almost completely replaced by mesanepisterna, which meet at midline to form a single plate, except at posterior edge, where the two halves separate on either side of a small, remnant of the mesoventrite; anterior edge of plate broadly, deeply emarginate, without coxal rests; sides steeply declined to meet mesepimera; surface smooth and apunctate mesally but densely punctate and setose on steep lateral sections; posterior remnant of mesoventrite and its discrimen extending posteriorly for a short distance and acute at apex. Mesocoxal cavities very weakly impressed, contiguous, with obliquely angulate anterior edges and without posterior edges, partly closed laterally by mesepimera. Metaventrite 1.20 times as long at midline and 1.60 times as long laterally as greatest width, strongly convex, without discrimen; posterior edge strongly oblique and sinuate on either side of subacute intercoxal lobe. Metanepisternum about 6.27 times as long as wide, widest anteriorly with sides slightly curved and strongly converging to narrowly truncate apex. Metendosternite with long, narrow stalk, paired, slender lateral arms forming an angle of about 30° and a long, slender, apically acute anterior process and no laminae or anterior tendons. Hind wing about 2.85 times long as wide; apical field 0.29 times total wing length, without radial extensions; radial cell absent; radial and medial veins joined at apical third of wing by transverse connection, straight anteriorly, sinuate posteriorly and probably derived from cross-vein r4 and the radiomedial loop; MP +1+2 +long, straight and continuing as medial spur to wing margin; medial field with four veins (CuA +1+2 +, CuA +3+4 +, CuP + AA +3 +and AA +4 +), all extending to wing margin. Anal lobe moderately well-developed, without embayment, containing AP +3+4 +. Procoxa 3.00 times as long as wide, widest near base and very slightly narrowed to apex, strongly projecting; Mesocoxa 2.50 times as long as wide, widest near base and slightly narrowed apically, slightly projecting. Metacoxa 0.0.3 times as long as wide, strongly oblique, almost contiguous and projecting near midline, without coxal cowling on mesal half. Trochanterofemoral joints strongly oblique, but with femur well separated from coxa. Fore legs relatively short: profemur 2.4 times as long as wide; protibia 1.25 times as long as femur, 5 times as long as wide, slightly expanded at apex; protarsi combined 1.2 times as long as tibia, with segment length ratio 2.25: 1.75: 2.25: 1.00: 2.75. Mid and hind legs longer and slenderer. Mesofemur 3.5 times as long as wide, slightly wider at middle; mesotibia 1.57 times as long as femur, 11 times as long as wide and more or less parallel-sided; combined tarsal length 1.53 times that of tibia, with segment lengths 2.23: 1.61: 1.38: 1.00: 1.54. Metafemur 3.67 times as long as wide, slightly wider at middle; metatibia 1.59 times as long as femur, 11.7 times as long as wide and more or less parallel-sided; combined tarsal length 1.56 times that of tibia, with segment lengths 2.13: 1.53: 1.33: 1.00: 1.27. Pretarsal claws moderately long and slender, empodium with multisetose. Abdomen with most tergites and sternites subequal in length and degree of sclerotisation; male with 7 ventrites (sternites II–VIII) and female with 6 (II–VII); first ventrite in both sexes somewhat shorter than second, without intercoxal process; ventrites 2–5 (sternites III–VI) and their corresponding tergites more or less equal in length, the sternites with narrow, poorly defined laterosternites and spiracles located in pleural membrane. Ventrite 6 (sternite VII) in male 1.18 times as long as 5 with broadly curved apex; tergite VII 1.9 times as long as wide and truncate at apex; sternite VIII in male half as long as VII, 1.56 times as long as wide, with sides subparallel to apical fourth and shortly, abruptly converging to form apical lobe, which is gradually narrowed to subacute apex; tergite VIII of similar size and shape but with apical lobe subtruncate. Segment IX with pregenital ring moderately wide at base but subacute at apex (anteriorly); sternite 1.9 times as long as wide, divided into an anterior triangular section, lying within the pregenital ring, and a shorter, parallel-sided posterior section, which is deeply emarginate apically to form a pair of apically rounded lobes; tergite IX subquadrate, evenly sclerotised and fused to segment X, which is 1.5 times as long as IX, 0.7 times as long as wide at base, with sides slightly narrowed to basal third and parallel-sided to subtruncate apex. Aedeagus with basale 1.34 times as long as wide, widest at posterior edge and gradually narrowing to rounded base; apicale 0.78 times as long as basale, divided into paired parameroids, each of which is 2.22 times as long as wide with outer edge sightly curved, inner edge bearing a large, apically widened, heavily sclerotised lobe and bearing at base a pair of tegminal struts, one attached to the opposite strut and to the penis and the other joined only to the opposite strut. Penis 1.2 times as long as basale and 4.2 times as long as wide, curved, with apex narrow and slightly cleft and with pair of broad basal struts about 0.6 times as long as body of penis. Ventrite 6 (sternite VII) in female 1.27 times as long as 5, 2.38 times as long as wide, parallel-sided, with broadly rounded apex, tergite VII slightly shorter with subtruncate apex; segment VIII in female about half as long as VII, twice as a long as wide and widest at middle, with sides curved and both tergites and sternites membranous along midline; spiculum ventrale 1.67 times as long as segment and articulated at base. Oviposi-tor 10.5 times as long as wide, more or less parallel-sided; paraprocts 1.75 times as long as gonocoxites, which are 3.45 times as long as wide; apical coxital lobe about 1.5 times as long as basal lobe, densely setose with subacute apex; gonostyli about 0.08 times as long as gonocoxite, 2.67 times as long as wide, parallel-sided and attached laterally; ventral sclerite 0.86 times as long as gonocoxite; proctiger narrowly rounded apically. + + +Specimens examined. ACT +: + +Black Mountain +, + +21.ii.1956 + +, +light trap +, +I.F.B. Common +(1♁, +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Black Mountain +, + +25.i.1955 + +, +light trap +, +I.F.B. Common +(1♁, +13♀♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Canberra +, + +27.i.1982 + +, at light, +I. D. Naumann +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Canberra +, + +26.i.1958 + +, +W. J. M. Vestjens +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Canberra +, + +31.i.1961 + +, +E. F. Riek +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Dea-kin, + +30.i.1977 + +, E. B. +Britton +( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Lyneham +, i–ii.1964, B. P. +Moore +(1♁, +ANIC +) + +; + +Lyons +, + +19.i.2018 + +, at light, C. +R +. +Schipp +(2♁♁, +ANIC +) + +; + +Mt. Ainslie +, + +2.ii.1969 + +, at light, E. M. +Reed +( +2♀♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Mt. Ainslie +, + +22.i.1977 + +, E. +Reed +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Sydney +, + +5.xii.1906 + +, +W. W. Froggatt +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +). + +NSW + +: +Batlow +, +1 mi. +NE, +Sydney +, + +5.xii.1906 + +, +W. W. Froggatt +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Binnaway +, 1.1934, H. C. +Field +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Bogan River +, J. +Armstrong +(2♁♁, +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Gundaroo Rd. +, + +11.i.1978 +, +22.i.1980 + +, B. P. +Moore +(2♁♁, +ANIC +) + +; + +Gunning +, + +29.i.1998 + +(1♁, +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Holbrook +, +17 mi. +NE, + +2.ii.1956 + +, +I.F.B. Common +(2♁♁, +1♀ +ANIC +) + +; + +Houlaghan’s Creek +, + +10 mi. +N Wagga Wagga + +, + +20.i.1967 + +, B. +Cantrell +( +10♀♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Marrar +, 111.1981, A. L. +Dyce +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Narrabri +, +Ag. Res. Sta. + +21.xi.1965 + +, +W. E. Wright +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +Pearl Beach +, nr. +Woy Woy +, + +9–11.xii.1988 + +, +J. A. MacDonald +( +1♀ +, +ASCU +) + +; + +Queanbeyan +, +2.7 km +NE, + +670m + +, + +25.i.1979 +, +22.ii.1980 + +, +I.F.B. Common +(1♁, +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Rydalmere +, + +30.xii.1967 + +, +Mercury +vapor light (1♁, +ASCU +) + +; + +Tarcutta +, “Nundi”, + +14.i.1958 + +, +D. E. McEachern +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Wilton +, +CSIRO +Exp. Farm +, + +12.i.1982 + +, +V +. +I. Robinson +(1♁, +AMS +). + +QLD +: + +Binna Burra +, + +27.xii.1969 + +, +R +. +Hardie +(1♁, +ANIC +) + +; + +Blackdown Tableland +, +Expedition Range +, + +5–6.xii.1979 + +, +MV +light, +G. Daniels +(1♁, +1♀ +QMB +) + +; + +Brisbane +, + +16.x.1911 + +, +H. Hacker +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Brisbane +, + +28.xii.1919 + +, +A. J. Turner +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Brisbane +, + +12.xii.1953 + +, +A. J. Jenkins +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Brisbane +, + +20.x.1962 + +, +G. Monteith +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Brisbane +, + +5.i.1965 + +, +A. E. May +(1♁, +QMB +) + +; + +Brisbane +, + +15.i.1972 + +, +W. Higham +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Brisbane +, 111.1983, D. +Reeves +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Bundaberg +, +22 km +. SW, ( +25°01’S +, +152°13’E +), + +23.xi.1993 + +, +MV +lamp, +G. & A. Daniels +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Caloundra +, + +4.i.1967 + +, +C. E. Chadwick +(1♁, +ASCU +) + +; + +Carnarvon Nat. Park +, + +8.xii.1979 + +, mv lamp, G. +Daniels +, M. A. +Schneider +(1♁, +QMB +) + +; + +Carnarvon Range +, + +20.xii.1938 + +, +N. Geary +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Crows Nest +, +1 km +S ( +27°16’S +, +152°03’E +), + +14.xii.1990 + +, white light, +T +. +Gush +(1♁, +ANIC +) + +; + +Kenmore +, + +17.xii.1957 + +, at light, +R +. P. +Kleinschmidt +(1♁, +QDAF +) + +; + +Lamington Nat. Pk. +, + +4.ii.1966 + +, +S. Curtis +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Lamington Nat. Pk. + +11–17.ii.1967 + +, +G. B. Monteith +(1♁, +QMB +) + +; + +Leyburn +, +5 km +N ( +27°58’S +, +151°38’E +), + +22.i.1988 + +, mv 1amp, G. & A. +Daniels +(2♁♁, +QMB +) + +; + +Mareeba +, +24 km +NbyW ( +16°47’S +, +145°22’E +), + +24–25.xi.1981 + +, J. +Balderson +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Millstream Falls +N. P. ( +17°39’S +, +145°27’E +), open forest, + +21–27.xi.1998 + +, at light, A. +Calder +(2♁ ♁ ♁, +ANIC +) + +; + +Mt. Archer +, Rockhamp-ton ( +23°20’S +, +150°59’E +), + +24.xii.1993 + +, mv lamp, G. & A. +Daniels +, +R +. +Eastwood +(1♁, +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Mt. Cook Nat. Park +( +15°29’S +, +145°16’E +), + +11–12.x.1980 + +, +T +. +Weir +(1♁, +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Mt. Coolum +( +26°33’S +, +153°05’E +), + +15.xii.1968 + +, lights, +Brtton +& +Misko +(2♁♁, +ANIC +) + +; + +Mt. Coo-tha +( +27°29’S +. +152°57’E +), + +260m + +, open forest, + +10.i.2002 + +, 10350, +MV +Light, G. B +. +Monteith +(5♁♁, +QMB +) + +; + +Mt. Gannon +summit, via +West Burleigh +, rainforest, + +18.i.1987 + +, G. +Monteith +, D. +Cook +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Mt. Hardgrave +, +1 mi. +SE ( +27°31’S +, +153°28’E +), + +110m + +, + +21.i.2002 + +, +MV +light, Burwell, +Wright +& +Cook +(1♁, +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Mt. Hypipamee +( +17°26’S +, +145°29’E +), + +18–26.xi.1998 + +, at light, +A. Calder +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +) + +; + +Nam-bour, + +22.viii.1967 + +, J. +Donaldson +( +1♀ +, +QDAF +) + +; + +Redcliffe +, + +30.xii.1937 + +(1♁, +QDAF +; 1♁ +ANIC +) + +; + +Rolleston +, +23 km +S, + +24.xi.1986 + +, +M. S. & B. J. Moulds +( +1♀ +, +AMS +) + +; + +Sunnybank +, + +19.xii.1968 + +, ex house ( +1♀ +, +QDAF +) + +; + +Tamborine Mtn. +, + +3.i.1931 + +(1♁, +ANIC +) + +; + +Tarragindi +, +Brisbane +, + +14.xii.1957 + +, at light, RPK ( +1♀ +, +QDAF +) + +; + +Tinaroo Creek Rd. +, +13 km +from +Kennedy Hwy. +( +17°04’55.36”S +, +145°30’30.07”E +), + +467m + +, + +19.xi.2012 + +, +D. C. F. Rentz +(1♁, +1♀ +. +ANIC +) + +; + +South Pine River +, + +29.i.1928 + +, H. +Hacker +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +; + +Toowong +, + +24.1.1958 + +, at light, ARB (1♁, +QDAF +) + +; + +Toringa +, + +23.xi.1961 + +, ARB (1♁, +QDAF +) + +; + +Woombye +, + +17.xii.1970 + +, +D. H. Colless +( +1♀ +, +ANIC +). + +SA +: + +Adelaide +, + +25.i.1970 + +, +D. S. Rogers +( +1♀ +, +QMB +) + +. + +WA: +Bunbury +, + +ix.1958 + +, +A. Snell +(1♁, +ANIC +) + +; + +John Forrest Nat. Park +, +Darling Ranges +, + +21.i.1971 + +, +MV +lamp, +G. A. Holloway +, +H. Hughes +(1♁, +AMS +) + +; + +Ludlow +, + +26.i.1925 + +, +J. Clark +(1♁, +ASCU +) + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Widely distributed in +Australia +, but records lacking from +Victoria +and +Tasmania +. + + + + +Biology. +Adults are almost always attracted to lights or light traps at night. Details of the biology of the Pinhole Borer in WA were given by +Clark (1925) +, who illustrated the male, female and larva plus the +type +of wood damage. The relative rarity of adults in collections was explained by the fact that the beetles fly up to the canopy immediately after emerging from the burrow. Clark noted that in WA the hosts of this species included several myrtaceous trees, including Blackbutt ( + +Eucalyptus patens +Benth. + +), Tuart +( + +E. gomphocephala +DC. + +), Jarrah ( + +E. marginata +Donn ex Sm. + +), Wandoo ( + +Eucalyptus wandoo +Blakely + +), Flooded Gum ( + +Eucalyptus rudis +Endl. + +) and Marri ( + +Corymbia calophylla +(Lindl.) K.D. Hill & L.A.S. Johnson + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/36/20/3736201721685AE1DC151ADA50675235.xml b/data/37/36/20/3736201721685AE1DC151ADA50675235.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..26bb53dba5b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/36/20/3736201721685AE1DC151ADA50675235.xml @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ + + + +Additions to the taxonomy of New World Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). + + + +Author + +Longino, J. T. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2009 + +2181 + + +1 +90 + + + + +http://hol.osu.edu/reference-full.html?id=22820 + +journal article +22820 + + + + +Pheidole acamata + + + + + +Pheidole acamata +Wilson, 2003: 258 + +, figs. Holotype major worker and associated paratype minor worker: Nicaragua, Kukra River 4 Mar 1992 (Perfecto). [ +MCZ +] (examined). + + + +Geographic Range +Nicaragua, Mexico (Chiapas). + + +Biology +This species occurs in wet forest habitats from sea level to 1000m elevation. It can be locally abundant. It is an epigaeic forager, common at baits, and often recruiting major workers along with minor workers. Workers are also collected in Winkler or Berlese samples. The nest is unknown. + + +Comments + +Throughout Central America a group of +Pheidole +share a distinctive character of the major worker: the gaster is covered with a plush layer of short, subdecumbent pubescence and any longer erect setae are absent or restricted to a few near the postpetiolar insertion. This contrasts with the rest of the body, which has a more "normal" condition, with abundant long suberect setae on the tibiae and mesosomal dorsum. In most +Pheidole +the general level of pilosity is similar over the body: if setae are sparse they are sparse throughout; if they are abundant they are abundant throughout, including the gastral dorsum. + + +Three named species are known to be in this complex, all described as new by +Wilson (2003) +: +P. acamata, +P. potosiana +, and +P. psilogaster +. Additional collections of this complex from Costa Rica and southern Mexico +allow +some comments on character variation. Across all material the major workers are very uniform in habitus and there are no consistent differences in pilosity or sculpture that differentiate the three species. Thus, at this time the majors of the three species cannot be identified without associated minor workers. Two of the species, +P. potosiana +and +P. psilogaster +, have minor workers with smooth and shiny faces. The minor worker of +P. acamata +has a densely and uniformly foveolate face. The minor worker of +P. potosiana +has the dominant sculpture of the pronotum foveolate, with variable degrees of shiny patches and rugulae. The minor worker of +P. psilogaster +has the pronotum entirely smooth and shiny or largely smooth with some development of transverse rugulae anterodorsally. The three species show both broad and local patterns of sympatry. + + +The types of +P. acamata +from the Atlantic coastal lowlands of Nicaragua are identical to numerous collections from sites in the lowlands of northern Chiapas State, Mexico. The face and pronotum have reticulate rugae overlaying the foveolate sculpture, weak on the face and stronger on the pronotum, and the color is orange yellow. A population from one site in Chiapas near Salto de Agua is somewhat different: the minor workers have a duskier coloration and the reticulate rugulation on face and pronotum are much reduced to absent. These characters are more like +P potosiana +. The two species are sympatric at Salto de Agua and are very similar there, differing only in the presence or absence of foveolate sculpture on the face. + + +Relatively few collections of +P. potosiana +have been examined. The types are from the state of San Luis Potosi, Mexico. The minor workers are uniformly red brown. The pronotum is largely foveolate, with smooth shiny patches on the side and dorsum. Collections from northern Chiapas lowlands are identical to the types or with the pronotum more uniformly foveolate, with shiny patches reduced to absent. A collection from Santa Rosa National Park in Costa Rica, in the dry forest of the northwestern lowlands, is nearly identical to the types, differing only in a somewhat darker brown coloration and slightly more developed transverse rugulae on the anterior pronotum. A few minor workers from further south in Costa Rica's Pacific lowlands are tentatively identified as +P. potosiana +. + + +Pheidole psilogaster +, as here interpreted, shows considerable geographic variation in color of the body and sculpture of the pronotum. The types of +P. psilogaster +from Veracruz State, Mexico are nearly identical to material from the Atlantic lowlands of Costa Rica. The coloration is dark red brown and the pronotum is completely smooth and shining. Collections from the Osa Peninsula, on the southwest Pacific coast of Costa Rica, and from the northern Chiapas lowlands are yellow orange and the pronotum has faint rugulae and sometimes traces of faint foveolate sculpture overlaying the generally smooth and shining surface. Minor workers in this complex can be very similar to other species outside of the complex. For example, in the northern Chiapas lowlands +Pheidole acamata +and P. erethizon, both very common, have currently indistinguishable minor workers. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/36/23/373623D87BDF58C2A6DE2EBF46F8A841.xml b/data/37/36/23/373623D87BDF58C2A6DE2EBF46F8A841.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f2a53295235 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/36/23/373623D87BDF58C2A6DE2EBF46F8A841.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Floristic inventory and distribution characteristics of algific talus slopes in a specific area of forest biodiversity in South Korea + + + +Author + +Lee, Jong-Won +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-8396 +Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Yun, Ho-Geun +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Hwang, Tae Young +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Kyungmin +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Jung, Se-Hoon +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +An, Jong Bin +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea +ajb8825@korea.kr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-12-18 + + +11 + + +113952 +113952 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 +1314-2828-11-e113952 +5B963235F71B550FA1E3BC1F0E590B10 + + + + +Boehmeria japonica (L.f.) Miq., 1867 + + + +Distribution +China, Kuril Islands to Temperate East Asia + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/36/54/373654CD0FDDFD8DD5D9BFF5E7AF8A20.xml b/data/37/36/54/373654CD0FDDFD8DD5D9BFF5E7AF8A20.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..abc01e12410 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/36/54/373654CD0FDDFD8DD5D9BFF5E7AF8A20.xml @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ + + + +The cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) of India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Myanmar, Nepal and Sri Lanka: an annotated provisional catalogue, regional checklist and bibliography + + + +Author + +Price, Benjamin Wills + + + +Author + +Allan, Elizabeth Louise + + + +Author + +Marathe, Kiran + + + +Author + +Sarkar, Vivek + + + +Author + +Simon, Chris + + + +Author + +Kunte, Krushnamegh + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8051 +8051 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8051 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8051 +1314-2828--8051 + + + + +Platypleura assamensis Atkinson, 1884 + + + + +Platypleura assamensis +Atkinson, 1884 + + +Platypleura repanda +var. a Distant, 1889 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Syntype +. Taxon: scientificName: Platypleuraassamensis Atkinson, 1884; Location: continent: Asia; country: +India +; locality: +Sibsagar +; Record Level: institutionCode: +NZSI +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +BMNH(E) 1009507 +; recordedBy: +William Doherty +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +female +; Taxon: scientificName: Platypleuraassamensis Atkinson, 1884; Location: continent: Asia; country: +India +; locality: +Margherita, Upper Assam +; Record Level: institutionCode: +NHMUK +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Syntype +. Taxon: scientificName: Platypleuraassamensis Atkinson, 1884; Location: continent: Asia; country: +India +; locality: +Naga Hills +; Record Level: institutionCode: +NZSI +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Distribution +[Distant, 1889/92] Continental India: Daejeeling; Assam: Seebsager and Naga Hills; Khasi Hills.; [Metcalf, 1963] Assam; Sibsagar; India; Uttar Pradesh. [Duffels and van der Laan, 1985] Bhutan. [Sanborn, 2014] China. + + +Notes + +Authority: +Atkinson 1884 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/36/73/373673C5CC75577480B8B91D6F5E001F.xml b/data/37/36/73/373673C5CC75577480B8B91D6F5E001F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d52a6960b8a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/36/73/373673C5CC75577480B8B91D6F5E001F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ + + + +Checklist of digeneans (Platyhelminthes, Trematoda, Digenea) of Georgia + + + +Author + +Arabuli, Lela +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9921-6343 +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia +lela.arabuli.1@iliauni.edu.ge + + + +Author + +Murvanidze, Lali +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia + + + +Author + +Faltynkova, Anna +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-5881 +Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic + + + +Author + +Mumladze, Levan +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-6973 +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2024 + +2024-01-08 + + +12 + + +110201 +110201 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e110201 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e110201 +1314-2828-12-e110201 +2E017986F1F55AB49BD4F0A41AB76F82 + + + + +Lecithaster confusus Odhner, 1905 + + + + +Lecithaster musteli +Srivastava, 1966 + + + +Parasite of + +fishes - +Cyprinidae +: + +Alburnus derjugini + +; +Clupeidae +: + +Alosa immaculata + +. + + +Site of infection +: intestine. + + + +Distribution + +Occurring in the Holarctic Region, Africa; +in Georgia +: WG: Paliastomi Lake reported by +Chernova (1977) +and +Murvanidze et al. (2018) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/36/F2/3736F24343895DFFBA57229A0452E87E.xml b/data/37/36/F2/3736F24343895DFFBA57229A0452E87E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cf9f9cefd80 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/36/F2/3736F24343895DFFBA57229A0452E87E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ + + + +Gems of the southern Japanese seas - four new species of Edwardsianthus (Anthozoa, Actiniaria, Edwardsiidae) with redescriptions of two species + + + +Author + +Izumi, Takato +Molecular Invertebrate Systematics and Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Chemistry, and Marine Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, 1 Senbaru, Nishihara, Okinawa 903 - 0213, Japan +iz.takato@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Fujii, Takuma +Kagoshima City Aquarium, 3 - 1 Honko-shinmachi, Kagoshima, 892 - 0814, Japan & International Center for Island Studies Amami Station, Kagoshima University, 15 - 1 Naze-Minatomachi, Amami, Kagoshima 894 - 0026, Japan & The Kagoshima University Museum, 1 - 21 - 30 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890 - 0065, Japan + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2021 + +2021-12-10 + + +1076 + + +151 +182 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1076.69025 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1076.69025 +1313-2970-1076-151 +7B4E12710B60450480B368028E4B1AD6 +8DB0FAF7DD4E5718A2A57AFD9CC3A7EE + + + + +Edwardsianthus gilbertensis Carlgren, 1931 + + + + +Japanese name: minami-mushimodoki-ginchaku: Uchida & Soyama, 2001 Figs 3F-J +, 4 + + + + +Edwardsia gilbertensis +Carlgren, 1931: 10-12, figs 7-9. + + +Edwardsianthus gilbertensis +: England, 1987: 218, 231, fig. 10; Uchida and Soyama, 2001: 49. + + + +Material examined. + + +CMNH-ZG 06527: dissected specimen, histological sections, tissues in paraffin, and prepared nematocysts, collected by wading on +7 June 2013 +from the intertidal zone of +Kabira Bay +, +Ishigaki Island +, Okinawa Pref., +Japan +, by +Kensuke Yanagi +; NSMT-Co 1701: dissected specimens (2 individuals), collected by hand during wading on +26 March 2015 +from the intertidal zone of +Funaura Bay +, +Iriomote Island +, +Okinawa Pref. +, +Japan +, by +Takato Izumi +; NSMT-Co 1781: dissected or whole specimens (3 individuals), collected by wading on +17 March 2015 +from the intertidal zone of +Yonaha Bay +, +Miyako Island +, +Okinawa Pref. +, +Japan +, by +Takato Izumi +; NSMT-Co 1782: histological sections, tissues in paraffin, and prepared nematocysts, collected by wading on +19 March 2014 +from the intertidal zone of +Kataburu Beach +, +Yonaguni Island +, +Okinawa Pref. +, +Japan +, by +Takato Izumi +; NSMT-Co 1783: histological sections, tissues in paraffin, and prepared nematocysts, collected by wading on +23 March 2015 +from the intertidal zone of +Kataburu Beach +, +Yonaguni Island +, +Okinawa Pref. +, +Japan +, by +Takato Izumi +; NSMT-Co 1784-NSMT-Co 1789: whole or dissected specimens, collected by wading on +17 March 2016 +from the intertidal zone of +Kataburu Beach +, +Yonaguni Island +, +Okinawa Pref. +, +Japan +, by +Takato Izumi +; NSMT-Co 1790: dissected specimens (3 individuals), collected by wading on +24 March 2015 +from the intertidal zone of +Higawa Bay +, +Yonaguni Island +, +Okinawa Pref. +, +Japan +, by +Takato Izumi +; NSMT-Co 1791: histological sections, tissues in paraffin, collected by wading on +23 September 2014 +from the intertidal zone of +Senaga Island +, +Okinawa Pref. +, +Japan +, by +Takato Izumi +; NSMT-Co 1792: histological sections, tissues in paraffin, collected by wading on +21 September 2014 +from the intertidal zone of +Yagaji Island +, +Okinawa Pref. +, +Japan +, by +Takato Izumi +; NSMT-Co 1793: histological sections, tissues in paraffin, collected by hand during snorkeling on +9 November 2015 +from +Shio-michi +, +Kikai Island +, +Kagoshima Pref. +, +Japan +, + +1 m +depth + +, by Takato Izumi + +. + + + +Description. + + +External anatomy +. + +Size: preserved specimens ca. 20-60 mm in whole length, and 2.5-3.5 mm in width, with worm-like form, and equal width along whole body. Column: consisting of capitulum, scapus, and physa. The distal-most part capitulum, translucent or opaque gray in color in living specimens, short, without nemathybomes. Scapus with thick periderm-like cuticle, brownish orange in color, both in living and preserved specimens, and with tiny, pale white in color, more or less in 8 rows nemathybomes. Aboral end apparent physa (Fig. +4A +). Tentacles: 20 in number in two cycles; inner tentacles four or five and outer 10-15, opaque whitish gray in color in living animals (Fig. +4B +; this color is lost in preserved specimen), without acrospheres. Inner tentacles slender, ca. 1 mm in length, and outer ones long, slender, short, with sparse white spots on surface, 2-3 mm in length. Mouth: at the center of oral disc, a little swollen. + +Internal anatomy +. + +Mesenterial arrangement: eight perfect mesenteries, all macrocnemes. Four dorsal and ventral directives, and four lateral mesenteries not paired with other macrocnemes, (Fig. +4E +). All macrocnemes are present along the whole body length from oral to aboral end, and bear distinct retractor and parietal muscles. Approximately seven to twelve tiny microcnemes, without muscles, only confined to distal-most part. Four microcnemes between dorsal directives and dorso-lateral mesenteries, four between dorso-and ventro-lateral mesenteries, and four between ventro-lateral mesenteries and ventral directives. Retractor muscles: at the mid part of column, distinct and diffused (Fig. +4E, F +), pennon-like, consist of ca. 15-35 simple or slightly branched muscular processes (Fig. +4F +). Parietal muscles: distinctly developed, leaf-like shape elongated along mesenteries, with ca. ten simple or slightly branched muscular processes in each side (Fig. +4F +). Others: each with one tentacle from each endo- or exocoel. Actinopharynx short, limited in uppermost part (Fig. +4C +), without siphonoglyph. Tentacular circular muscle indistinct, and longitudinal muscle distinct, ectodermal. Mesoglea thickest in body wall (Fig. +4E +), and comparatively thick in tentacles (Fig. +4C +), but thinner in mesenteries and parietal muscles (Fig. +4F +). Nemathybomes protruding from mesoglea (Fig. +4D +). Marginal sphincter muscle and basilar muscle absent. Gametogenic tissue not attached to retractor muscles, distinct, but no mature gametocyte. Zooxanthellae sparsely distributed on endoderm of mesenteries (Fig. +4F +). + +Cnidom +. + +Basitrichs, spirocysts, and microbasic +p +-mastigophores. See Fig. +3F-J +and Table +4 +for sizes and distributions of cnidae. + + + +Figure 4. +External and internal morphology of + +Edwardsianthus gilbertensis + +(CMNH-ZG 06527 except for B) +A +outer view of preserved specimen +B +oral view of living specimen with 18 tentacles in the habitat +C +longitudinal section of oral end +D +transverse section of nemathybome +E +transverse section of column in lower part; +F +. Enlarged view of transverse section of mesenteries. Abbreviations: a, actinopharynx; cap, capitulum; fi, filament; ma, macrocneme; ne, nemathybomes; pa, parietal muscle; ph, physa; rm, retractor muscle; scs, scapus; te, tentacle. Scale bars: 5 mm ( +A +); 1 mm ( +B +); 500 +µm +( +C, E, F +); 100 +µm +( +D +). Photograph B by Kensuke Yanagi. + + + + +Remarks. + + +Edwardsia gilbertensis + +was originally described from the Gilbert Islands, Kiribati (Carlgren, 1931), and there have been several reports from other localities in the tropical/subtropical zone in the Pacific (Fautin, 2013). However, there were no records of + +E. gilbertensis + +from Japan except for a fieldguide (Uchida & Soyama, 2001), which reported this species from Kabira Bay, Ishigaki Island. In this research we discovered many individuals of + +E. gilbertensis + +living not only in the intertidal zone of Kabira Bay in Ishigaki Island (Fig. +4B +), but also across a broad area of the Nansei Islands, from Kikai Island, Amami Islands (Kagoshima Pref.) to Yonaguni Island, Yaeyama Islands (Okinawa Pref.). The morphological features of these specimens almost completely correspond to the original description of +Carlgren (1931) +: 6.5 cm in length and 0.2 cm in width in fixed specimens; 16-20 tentacles; nemathybomes more or less in rows; 20-30 muscular processes on retractors. The cnidom of our specimen also agrees well with the original description, especially concerning the point that there is only one type of cnidae, "31-41 +x +(2)2.5(3) +µ" +in size (Carlgren, 1931) in the nemathybomes. Thus, it is confirmed that + +Edwardsianthus gilbertensis + +is widely distributed in the southern islands of Japan including Ishigaki Island. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/37/4F/37374F121BA36B06605A1F4C0F011C64.xml b/data/37/37/4F/37374F121BA36B06605A1F4C0F011C64.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d52397be4a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/37/4F/37374F121BA36B06605A1F4C0F011C64.xml @@ -0,0 +1,209 @@ + + + +New Coleoptera records for New Brunswick, Canada: Kateretidae, Nitidulidae, Cerylonidae, Endomychidae, Coccinellidae, and Latridiidae + + + +Author + +Webster, Reginald P. +Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent St., P. O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB, Canada E 3 B 5 P 7 +reginaldwebster@rogers.com + + + +Author + +Sweeney, Jon D. +Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent St., P. O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB, Canada E 3 B 5 P 7 + + + +Author + +DeMerchant, Ian +Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent St., P. O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB, Canada E 3 B 5 P 7 + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-04-04 + + +179 + + +193 +214 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.179.2581 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.179.2581 +1313-2970-179-193 +6678FFECFFEAFFA1FFBDFFE51A55BE52 +577054 + + + + +Cerylon unicolor (Ziegler, 1845) +Map 6 + + + +Material examined. + +New Brunswick, Carleton Co. +, Jackson Falls, Bell Forest, +46.2200°N +, +67.7231°W +, 6.V.2007, R. P. Webster, mature hardwood forest, on fleshy polypore (bracket) fungi on dead standing beech (1, RWC); same locality and forest type but 1-8.VI.2009, 16-21.VI.2009, 21-28.VI.2009, 7-14.VII.2009, R. Webster & M.-A. +Giguere +, Lindgren funnel traps (4, AFC, RWC); Meduxnekeag Valley Nature Preserve, +46.1907°N +, +67.6740°W +, 7.VI.2007, R. P. Webster, hardwood forest, under bark of sugar maple log (1, RWC). +Charlotte Co. +, 10 km NW of New River Beach, +45.2110°N +, +66.6170°W +, 15-29.VI.2010, R. Webster & C. MacKay, old growth eastern white cedar forest, Lindgren funnel trap (1, AFC). +Queens Co. +, Cranberry Lake P.N.A., +46.1125°N +, +65.6075°W +, 5-11.VI.2009, 25.VI-1.VII.2009, R. Webster & M.-A. +Giguere +, mature red oak forest, Lindgren funnel trap (2, NBM, RWC). +Restigouche Co. +, Kedgwick Forks, +47.9085°N +, +67.9057°W +, 22.VI.2010, river margin, in flood debris (1, NBM). +Sunbury Co. +, Portobello Creek N.W.A., Maugerville, +45.8990°N +, +66.4200°W +, 28.VI.2004, R. P. Webster, silver maple swamp, under bark of log (1, RWC); Acadia Research Forest, +45.9866°N +, +66.3841°W +, 16-24.VI.2009, 24-30.VI.2009, R. Webster & M.-A. +Giguere +, mature (110 year-old) red spruce forest with scattered red maple and balsam fir, Lindgren funnel traps (5, AFC). +York Co. +, Charters Settlement, +45.8188°N +, +66.7460°W +, 25.VIII.2004, R. P. Webster, clear-cut, under bark of conifer stump (3, RWC); same locality but +45.8286°N +, +66.7365°W +, 2.VI.2007, R. P. Webster, mature red spruce forest, under bark of red spruce (1, RWC); 15 km W of Tracy off Rt. 645, +45.6848°N +, +66.8821°W +, 15-21.VI.2009, R. Webster & M.-A. +Giguere +, old red pine forest, Lindgren funnel traps (2, AFC); 14 km WSW of Tracy, S of Rt. 645, +45.6741°N +, +66.8661°W +, 10-26.V.2010, R. Webster & C. MacKay, old mixed forest with red and white spruce, red and white +pine +, balsam fir, eastern white cedar, red maple, and + +Populus + +sp., Lindgren funnel trap (1, AFC). + + + +Map 6. +Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of + +Cerylon unicolor + +. + + + + +Collection and habitat data. + +In Nova Scotia, this species was found in red spruce stands on + +Fomitopsis officinalis + +(Fr.) Bond. & Sing., in an old-growth hem +lock +( + +Tsuga canadensis + +(L.) Carr.) forest, and in a mixed old-growth hemlock, black spruce ( + +Picea mariana + +(Mill.) B.S.P.), and balsam fir ( + +Abies balsamea + +(L.) Mill.) stand ( +Majka and Langor 2011 +). This species has been reported from under bark of various hardwood and conifer species, and on fungi, such as + +Bjerkandera adusta + +(Fr.) Kar. and + +Phellinus gilvus + +(Schw.) Pat. ( +Lawrence and Stephan 1975 +). In New Brunswick, + +Cerylon unicolor + +was collected from under bark of sugar maple, silver maple ( + +Acer saccharinum + +L.), red spruce, and a conifer stump. One individual was sifted from flood debris along a river margin, another was found in fleshy polypore fungi on a dead, standing American beech tree. This species was also captured in Lindgren funnel traps deployed in hardwood forests with sugar maple and American beech, mixed forests, a mature red oak forest, an old red pine forest, a mature red spruce forest, and an old eastern white cedar ( + +Thuja occidentalis + +L.) forest. Adults were captured during May, June, and July. + + + +Distribution in Canada and Alaska. + +NT, BC, AB, ON, QC, +NB +, NS, NF ( +Campbell 1991a +; +Majka and Langor 2011 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/37/87/373787A6025C1F1CA983FEECFDCBFEF4.xml b/data/37/37/87/373787A6025C1F1CA983FEECFDCBFEF4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e1915580995 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/37/87/373787A6025C1F1CA983FEECFDCBFEF4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ + + + +Newly recorded genera in the planthopper family Tropiduchidae (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea) from Pakistan with redescription of Epora montana Distant + + + +Author + +Sohail, Kamran +Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of the Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, Northwest A & F University + + + +Author + +Webb, Mick +Department of Life Sciences (Insects), The Natural History Museum + + + +Author + +Zhang, Yalin +Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of the Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, Northwest A & F University +yalinzh@nwsuaf.edu.cn + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-04-09 + + +4763 + + +2 + + +281 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4763.2.10 +c19a4487-ebe9-45e8-a9a2-7430d7efee6c +1175-5334 +3758177 +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3362E5AF-1345-49E7-8DD9-5F3818048959 + + + + + + + +Epora montana +Distant, 1912 + +, new record to +Pakistan + + + + + + +( +Figs 1 +–17) + + + + + + + +Epora montana +Distant, 1912: 185 + + +. + + + + + + +Epora subtalis +Melichar, 1914: 51 + + +, junior synonym of + +E. subtalis + + + + + + + +Epora montana +Distant, 1916: 48 + + +, 51. + + + + + +Redescription +Figs (1–17) + + +Moderately large, body length (from apex of vertex to tip of forewing): male 6.9–7.0 mm (n=2); female +7.1–7.2 mm +(n=2). + +General color ochraceous; vertex, frons, pronotum, mesonotum and abdomen ochraceous or yellowish; compound eyes and ocelli yellowish; tegmina and veins pale ochraceous; legs ochraceous with spines on hind legs black tipped. + +Head in facial view with frons elongate longer in middle than width with rigid median and lateral margins; lateral margins subparallel slightly curved below antennae; frontoclypeal suture distinct slightly incised, slit like processes on anteclypeus; rostrum short, three segmented, not reaching hind coxae; first antennal segment short, ring shaped, second segment subglobose larger than first segment. Head, in dorsal view (incl. eyes), narrower than pronotum, slightly produced in front of eyes; vertex with distinct central longitudinal carina broader at level of base than middle anteriorly arched and thickened; lateral margins parallel and rigid, posterior margin concave, sharply raised; disc slightly incised, median carina not approaching anterior margin. Compound eyes large, oval; ocelli small. Pronotum with two median carina not reaching anterior margins, lateral carina not parallel curved towards anterior margin; short lateral carina on both sides between compound eyes and tegula; anterior margin of pronotum arched, posterior margin notched and excavated; pronotum at level of base wider than vertex. Mesonotum with three distinct carina; median carina straight reaching apical margin, lateral carina arched reaching posterior margin; pro and mesonotum longer in midline than vertex. Front wing hyaline concave in apical margin, posterior margin straight; costal margin with 14-15 obliquely transversely veinlets with apical and sub apical elongate narrow cells. Sc+R vein bifurcate at basal quarter, Cu +1 +forking at basal ¼, M vein joining nodal line, claval vein reached middle of clavus; hind wing transparent. Hind leg with 3 lateral tibial spines, spinal formula is 6-5-2. + +Male genitalia (Figs 11–15): Pygofer in profile quadrangular. In lateral view, anal segment elongate, tubular not reaching apex of aedeagus; lateroapical angles roundly produced, anal foramen in apical 1/4. Aedeagus long tubular, membranous basally curved, medially narrow slightly wider towards apex; apically with spine like processes directed caudally and two spines like processes laterally (one short and one long) directed towards anal segment. Periandrium short well developed with several processes; single short process arising in middle of aedeagus curving ventromesad bifurcating into two short diverging spine-like branches and 3 long processes directed posteriorly one on left and two on right side of aedeagus. Aedeagus with lobe like process near bent on ventral aspect. Gonostyle symmetrical, longer than wide laterally apically convex; dorsally with triangular process in distal half and with hook-like sclerotized processes directed posteriorly. Corpus connective tubular curved medially. +Female genitalia (Figs 16, 17): In lateral view anal segment short, in dorsal view slightly round apically, anal style small and short. First valve (gonophyses VIII) saw like with 6 stout teeth’s on dorsal margin; ventrally with few small teeth’s. Second valve (gonophyses XI) triangular shape slightly sclerotized basally wider apically joined; third valve (gonoplace) membranous with 6 apical sclerotized stout teeth centrally curved projecting dorsally. + + + +Material examined: +1♀ +( +Syntype +), +India +, Nilgiri Hills, Hampson, Distant Coll. 1911-383, +NHMUK +013588135 ( +BMNH +); +1♂ +, Calcutta, +22.v.1907 +, Distant Coll. 1911-383, +NHMUK +013588136 ( +BMNH +). +2♂♂ +, +2♀♀ +, +Pakistan +, +Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province +, Munjai, District Upper Dir +35°9'55.89"N +72°2'48.54"E +, +1840m +, +19-vi-2018 +, coll. Kamran Sohail ( +NWAFU +). + + + + +Distribution: +India +, +Pakistan +( +Khyber Pakhtunkhwa +) + + + + +Remarks: +This species was described from an unknown number of specimens (syntypic) with the following data: “Nilgiri Hills (Hampson)”. The single +syntype +in BMNH is figured together with an associated male. This species was treated as a junior synonym of + +E. subtilis + +by +Melichar (1914) +but +Distant (1916) +separated them by size and wing venation and recorded + +E. montana + +as a valid species. Here, we distinguish the two species based on shape of the head, being shorter in + +E +. +montana + +, from Borneo ( +syntypes +in BMNH), by its shorter head. This comparison is made with the original figure of + +E +. +subtilis + +( +Walker, 1857: 146 +, Pl. 7, Fig. 3) as the +syntype +in the BMNH and Hope Department, Oxford are without heads. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/37/87/373787A6025D1F1FA983F8E7FE28FE8C.xml b/data/37/37/87/373787A6025D1F1FA983F8E7FE28FE8C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aa305580eca --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/37/87/373787A6025D1F1FA983F8E7FE28FE8C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ + + + +Newly recorded genera in the planthopper family Tropiduchidae (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea) from Pakistan with redescription of Epora montana Distant + + + +Author + +Sohail, Kamran +Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of the Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, Northwest A & F University + + + +Author + +Webb, Mick +Department of Life Sciences (Insects), The Natural History Museum + + + +Author + +Zhang, Yalin +Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of the Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, Northwest A & F University +yalinzh@nwsuaf.edu.cn + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-04-09 + + +4763 + + +2 + + +281 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4763.2.10 +c19a4487-ebe9-45e8-a9a2-7430d7efee6c +1175-5334 +3758177 +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3362E5AF-1345-49E7-8DD9-5F3818048959 + + + + + + + +Epora +Walker, 1857 + + + + + + + + + + +Epora +Walker, 1857: 145 + + +. +Type +species: + +Epora subtalis +Walker, 1857 + +by original designation. + + + + + +Distribution: +China +; +India +; +Indonesia +; +Malaysia +; Philippine; +Sri Lanka +; +Vietnam +; +Pakistan +. + + + + +Remarks: +This genus has been adequately redescribed by + +Men +et al +. (2011) + +. It can be distinguished by narrow pronotum with strongly oblique lateral areas; posterior margin of vertex concave; narrow forewing with many oblique transverse veins. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/37/87/373787A6025E1F1AA983F8E8FAB3FE23.xml b/data/37/37/87/373787A6025E1F1AA983F8E8FAB3FE23.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..61002f2d6d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/37/87/373787A6025E1F1AA983F8E8FAB3FE23.xml @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ + + + +Newly recorded genera in the planthopper family Tropiduchidae (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea) from Pakistan with redescription of Epora montana Distant + + + +Author + +Sohail, Kamran +Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of the Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, Northwest A & F University + + + +Author + +Webb, Mick +Department of Life Sciences (Insects), The Natural History Museum + + + +Author + +Zhang, Yalin +Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of the Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, Northwest A & F University +yalinzh@nwsuaf.edu.cn + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-04-09 + + +4763 + + +2 + + +281 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4763.2.10 +c19a4487-ebe9-45e8-a9a2-7430d7efee6c +1175-5334 +3758177 +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3362E5AF-1345-49E7-8DD9-5F3818048959 + + + + + + + +Zema gressitti +Fennah, 1956 + +, new record to +Pakistan + + + + + + +( +Figs 18 +–23) + + + + + + + +Zema gressitti +Fennah, 1956: 502 + + +, Fig. 16; + +Wang & Liang, 2007: 63 + +, +Figs 1 +, 3–11. + + + + + +Remarks: +Wang & Liang (2007) +provided a detailed description of this species based on specimens from +China +. + + + + +Material examined: +Pakistan +, +2♂♂ +, +Punjab Province +, Kalar Kahar +32°46′59″ N +72°42′00″ E +, +643 m +, +4-vii- 2017 +, coll. Hassan Naveed ( +NWAFU +); +2♂♂ +, +2♀♀ +, +Pakistan +, +Punjab Province +, Jhika Gali, +9.ix.1971 +, nymph on + +Coriaria nepalensis +Wall. (Coriariaceae) + +( +BMNH +). + + + + +Distribution: +China +, +Nepal +, +Pakistan +( +Punjab +) + + + + +Remarks: +This species can be distinguished from the other species of the genus, + +Z +. +montana +Wang & Liang, 2007 + +, from +China +, by the shorter median carina of vertex (in basal 2/3 rather than throughout length of vertex), asymmetrical periandrium and aedeagal process bifurcate at mid length of aedeagus (rather than distally). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/37/87/373787A6025E1F1DA983F95BFAD1F8B1.xml b/data/37/37/87/373787A6025E1F1DA983F95BFAD1F8B1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4fc1fa49ced --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/37/87/373787A6025E1F1DA983F95BFAD1F8B1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ + + + +Newly recorded genera in the planthopper family Tropiduchidae (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea) from Pakistan with redescription of Epora montana Distant + + + +Author + +Sohail, Kamran +Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of the Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, Northwest A & F University + + + +Author + +Webb, Mick +Department of Life Sciences (Insects), The Natural History Museum + + + +Author + +Zhang, Yalin +Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of the Ministry of Education, Entomological Museum, Northwest A & F University +yalinzh@nwsuaf.edu.cn + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-04-09 + + +4763 + + +2 + + +281 +286 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4763.2.10 +c19a4487-ebe9-45e8-a9a2-7430d7efee6c +1175-5334 +3758177 +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3362E5AF-1345-49E7-8DD9-5F3818048959 + + + + + + + +Zema +Fennah, 1956 + + + + + + + + + + +Zema +Fennah, 1956: 500 + + +. +Type +species: + +Zema gressitti +Fennah, 1956 + +, by original designation; + +Wang & Liang, 2007: 62 + +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/37/B1/3737B141C8641187F6628A8DD2BFB252.xml b/data/37/37/B1/3737B141C8641187F6628A8DD2BFB252.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9fff6fcf9aa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/37/B1/3737B141C8641187F6628A8DD2BFB252.xml @@ -0,0 +1,822 @@ + + + +A revision of the New Zealand Kunzea ericoides (Myrtaceae) complex + + + +Author + +de Lange, Peter J. +Science & Capability Group, Terrestrial Ecosystems, Department of Conservation, Private Bag 68908 Newton, Auckland 1145, New Zealand + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2014 + +2014-08-26 + + +40 + + +1 +185 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.40.7973 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.40.7973 +1314-2003-40-1 +FFB6FF88FFE2B53E5D3FFF8F6B6F0639 +576244 + + + + +4. +Kunzea salterae de Lange +sp. nov. + + + + +A K. tenuicauli foliis constanter longioribus angustioribus lineo-lanceaceolatis, hypanthio maiore glabrato anguste obconico vel infundibuliforme, stigmate plano anguste capitato, lobisque antherae profunde sulcatis non testiculatis differt. + + + +Holotypus + + +(Fig. +21 +). + +New Zealand: +North Island, Bay of Plenty, Moutohora (Whale Island), McEwans Bay, +37°51'26"S +, +176°58'57"E +, 20m a.s.l. 'Occasional on sand dunes well away from active or senescent thermal +areas' +. P. J. de Lange 6471 & P. B. Cashmore, 15 Apr 2005, AK 289816! Isotype: AD! + + + +Figure 21. +Holotype of + +Kunzea salterae + +(P. J. de Lange 6471 & P. B. Cashmore, AK 289816). + + + + +Etymology. + +The specific epithet +salterae +commemorates my colleague and botanical illustrator for this monograph Josh Salter (1946-), whose critical attention to detail when illustrating specimens of + +Kunzea salterae + +proved invaluable in deciding on an appropriate taxonomic rank. + + + +Description + + +(Figs +22 +, +23 +, +24 +). + + +Growth +habit + +shrubs to small trees 0.1-6(-10) +x +2-4(-6) m with broad, spreading to somewhat pendulous crowns, rarely plants completely decumbent, sprawling across ground. +Trunk +usually multi-trunked from base, up to 0.3 m d.b.h., these mostly widely spreading to suberect, flexuose, often basally buttressed, branches frequent from base in exposed sites, otherwise naturally thinning in the lower half of the trunk. +Bark +early bark brown, initially firm, somewhat sinuous-fluted, elongate, over time cracking transversely (especially on branch flanges), and with apices gradually detaching and raising to present as small lunate (in profile) flakes, old grey-brown bark flaking readily in small, somewhat irregular tabular shards, often with small lunate secondary peeling; somewhat corky to chartaceous. +Branches +Two to many, suberect to widely spreading, rarely ascending, mostly pendulous, branchlets numerous and very leafy, rather slender, initially subterete soon becoming quadrangular; sericeous, indumentum initially copious rarely glabrate to glabrous, hairs on young rapidly growing apices, copious, sericeous, straight, antrorse-appressed up to 0.55 mm, these soon falling; other mostly divergent hairs long persistent, (especially opposite leaf buds and expanding foliage), 0.04-0.08(-0.1) mm, hyaline to translucent (appearing white when young maturing grey), apices ++/- +curled, often admixed (particularly toward branchlet apices and near decurrent leaf bases) with deciduous antrorse-appressed, straight to somewhat sinuous hairs up to 0.28 mm. +Vegetative buds +inconspicuous at resting stage 0.5-1.0 mm diam.; scales deciduous; (0.6-)1.2-2.3 mm long, stramineous to pale brown, initially broadly ovate to ovate-lanceolate grading through broadly lanceolate to narrowly lanceolate, midrib strongly keeled, prolonged to apiculate tip, with one prominent row of 4-10 oil glands on either side of midrib, margins, apex, apiculus and keel finely ciliate. +Leaves ++/- +spreading to patent; lamina (4-)10(-18) +x +(0.6-)1.2(-2.0) mm, bright glossy green, yellow-green, bronze-green to dark green; linear-lanceolate to narrowly oblanceolate, flat not recurved, apex acute to subacute, cuspidate, rarely obtuse to rounded; base attenuate; adaxial surface slightly concave to flat, finely glandular punctate; oil glands 180(-280), more evident when dry; midrib slightly raised to depressed near base otherwise depressed for entire length, initially densely covered in fine, antrorse-appressed silky hairs up to 0.22 mm, becoming glabrescent; abaxial surface slightly convex, finely glandular punctate, oil glands less obvious when fresh than when dry, up to 100, with the larger glands aligned longitudinally along midrib; midrib slightly raised, usually glabrous, sometimes with a fine weft of silky, deciduous, antrorse-appressed hairs near base; lamina margin sparsely to densely, finely sericeous, hairs mostly antrorse-appressed, up to 0.5 mm, hyaline to translucent, appearing as white to naked eye; hairs in 1-2 somewhat irregular rows just failing to meet short of cuspidate leaf apex. +Perules +scarious, basal ones usually persistent, 1.2-1.4 mm long, stramineous to brown, broadly to narrowly lanceolate, involute, midrib strongly keeled prolonged as a cuspidate apex, with one row of 4-8 oil glands on either side of midrib, lower two-thirds glabrous, upper one-third finely ciliate; remaining perules deciduous, chartaceous, 0.6-1.4 mm long, pale pink to pinkish-white when fresh, drying apricot to apricot-pink, broadly oval, ovate to rhomboid, finely and copiously ciliate, strongly keeled, keel prolonged, apiculate, margins and keel more distinctly ciliate. +Inflorescence +a (2-)4(-8)-flowered corymbiform botryum up to 45 mm long, usually on brachyblasts, rarely on long shoots in which case invariably terminal (only very rarely with terminal vegetative growth). Inflorescence axis densely invested with mostly divergent hairs. +Pherophylls +deciduous (falling very early), mostly squamiform, rarely foliose, spreading, 0.6-1.8 mm long; squamiform pherophylls brown or amber, sometimes pink, drying apricot-brown, broadly deltoid to oblong-ovate, margins involute especially in upper one-third, midrib strongly keeled prolonged as cuspidate apex, with one row of 4-8 oil glands on each side of midrib; glabrous except for the finely ciliate margin and apex; foliose pherophylls bright green, linear, margins and apex finely ciliate; both types grading into chartaceous, into perules and/or leaves at inflorescence terminus. +Pedicels +(1.1-)2.6(-3.0) mm long at anthesis and elongating slightly after anthesis, terete, finely invested in divergent to subantrorse sericeous hairs. +Flower buds +pyriform to clavate, apex domed with calyx valves not or scarcely meeting. Fresh flowers when fully expanded up (9-)10(-12) mm diam. +Hypanthium +(2.1-)2.2(-3.8) +x +(1.8-)2.2(-3.2) mm, with free portion 1.0-1.6 mm long, reddish-brown when fresh, drying resinous brown to grey; narrowly obconic to funnelform terminating in a slightly thicker rim bearing five persistent calyx lobes; surface smooth, finely glandular punctate, sparsely hairy to glabrate, with five rather weakly defined ridges leading up to calyx lobes (these becoming more distinct upon drying); hairs scattered, subantrorse to antrorse, flexuose. Calyx lobes 5, upright (not spreading), 0.6(-0.9) +x +1.1(-1.3) mm, persistent, broadly to narrowly triangular, weakly and broadly keeled (the keel though ill-defined in fresh specimens recognisable as a dark pink to red, thicker central prolongation of the hypanthium ridges), margins cream to pale yellow, gland-dotted, subcoriaceous, glabrate except for distinctly ciliate apex. Receptacle dark red at anthesis. +Petals +5, spreading, 1.4-1.6 +x +1.4-1.6 mm, white, rarely basally flushed pink, orbicular to suborbicular, apex obtuse to rotund, margins usually finely crimped, oil glands colourless or rose-pink, scarcely evident when fresh. +Stamens +28-36(-38) in 1-2 weakly defined whorls, adnate to receptacular rim, filaments white rarely tinged rose-pink toward base. Antipetalous stamens 3(-5) antisepalous 3(-4). Outermost antipetalous stamens strongly outcurved, on filaments 2.5-3.25 mm long, inner stamen 1.8-2.2 mm, outcurved, on occasion a further 1-2 incurved or outcurved, stamens 0.8-1.0 mm long, positioned at the base of the outermost antipetalous pair. Antisepalous stamens much shorter than antipetalous, 0.6-0.9(-1) mm, incurved, outcurved or in mixtures of both. Anthers dorsifixed, 0.11-0.16 +x +0.10-0.14 mm, scutiform to ovoid, latrorse, each anther deeply and longitudinally furrowed, with one anther lobe in each pair fused at right angles along inner margin with adjoining anther lobe to form a prominent +'pinched' +longitudinal ridge. Pollen white, (10.2-)14.7(-16.6) +μm +. Anther connective gland prominent, pale orange to pink when fresh, drying orange-brown, spheroidal, finely papillate, somewhat farinose. +Ovary +(3-)4 locular, each locule with 8-10 ovules in two rows on each placental lobe. Style 2.1-3.2 mm long at anthesis, white basally flushed with pink; stigma capitate, up to 1 +x +style diam., flat, abruptly broadened, pale cream, finely papillate rugulose. +Fruits +rarely persistent, (2.0-)2.2(-2.7) +x +(2.0-)2.9(-4.0) mm, light brown to grey, cupular to suburceolate, splits concealed by dried, erect, free portion of hypanthium. +Seeds +0.80-1.00 +x +0.45-0.48 mm, narrowly oblong, oblong, oblong-obovate to falcate-oblong or elliptic, curved near apex, laterally compressed, 2-3-angled with convex to flattened faces, apex rounded; base cuneate to oblique, ++/- +flattened; testa semi-glossy, orange-brown; surface coarsely reticulate, ridges prominent, central portion of some cells furnished with short, tubular-spiny, protuberances. FL: Aug-Apr FT: Aug-Sep. Chromosome Number +n += 11II, 2 +n += 22 (AK 283253, +P. B. Cashmore s.n. +, AK 298088, +P. J. de Lange +. + + + +Figure 22. +Distinguishing features of + +Kunzea salterae + +. +A +Flowering branchlet (AK 289816) +B +Vegetative bud and branchlet indumentum (AK 289816) +C +Adaxial leaf surface (AK 289816) +D +Abaxial leaf surface (AK 289816) +E +Adaxial leaf apex (AK 289816) +F +Leaf margin indumentum (AK 289816) +G +Leaf variation, all from Moutohora (Whale Island): ( +G1 +) (AK 185215), ( +G2 +) Boulder Bay (AK 288250), ( +G3-5 +) Sulphur Bay (AK 284105, AK 283253, AK 289814), ( +G6 +) Summit Hill Saddle (AK 289815), McEwans Bay (AK 289816) +H +Flower (top view) (AK 289816) +I +Flower and hypanthium (side view) (AK 289816) +J +Flower cross section showing anther, style and ovules (AK 289816) +K +Style and stigma (AK 289816) +L +Stamens (AK 289816) +M +Dehisced fruit (AK 289816). Scale bars: ( +A, G +) 10 mm; ( +B-E, H-M +) 1 mm; ( +F +) 0.5 mm. + + + + +Figure 23. +Scanning Electron Micrographs of + +Kunzea salterae + +. ( +A-E +all AK 284105) Branchlet indumentum +F-L +Seeds (AK 283253, AK 289815) +K-L +Close up of reticulum showing spines. Scale bars: ( +A, C, F +) 1 mm; ( +B, E +) 500 +μm +; ( +D, F-J +) 100 +μm +; ( +K, L +) 50 +μm +. + + + + +Figure 24. +Habitats of + +Kunzea salterae + +on Moutohora Island (photos: +P. B. Cashmore +). +A +Sand dunes and early stage successional forest leading to Summit Hill +B +Stable sand dunes and early stage forest surrounding Department of Conservation Hut and ride line leading to Summit Hill +C +Active geothermal vents within Sulphur Valley. + + + + +Representative specimens + +(15 Sheets seen). +Moutohora (Whale Island): +P. Hynes s.n., 28 Aug 1970, (AK 185215); Sulphur Bay, Geothermal Area, P. B. Cashmore s.n., 4 Sep 2002, (AK 297561); Boulder Bay, P. B. Cashmore s.n., 4 Sep 2002, (AK 283250); Sulphur Bay, Thermal Area (Active), P. J. de Lange 6469 & P. B. Cashmore, 15 Apr 2005, (AK 289814); Pa Hill/Summit Hill Saddle, P. J. de Lange 6469 & P. B. Cashmore, 15 Apr 2005, (AK 289815); Summit Hill (southern slopes), P. J. de Lange 6472 & P. B. Cashmore, 15 Apr 2005, (AK 289817, Duplicate AD). + + + +Distribution + + +(Fig. +7 +). + +Endemic, New Zealand, North Island, Bay of Plenty, Moutohora (Whale Island) (sea level to 220 m a.s.l.). + + + +Recognition. + + + +Kunzea +salterae + + +is recognised at species rank because it forms a true-breeding, morphologically stable population, recognised here by a combination of growth habit, branchlet hair and floral characters (see Table +1 +) as well as minor but consistent DNA sequence differences in the ETS marker region (Table +2 +; see also +de Lange 2007 +; +de Lange et al. 2010 +). It is further distinguished ecologically by its preference for sand dune and geothermal habitats (Fig. +24A-C +), and also by its sympatry/syntopy with + +Kunzea robusta + +, from which it is isolated morphologically, and from which I saw no field evidence of hybridism (see below). The presence of + +Kunzea salterae + +on Moutohora, a small (143 ha) volcanic island estimated to be 36 000 years BP (see +Ramsay and Hayward 1971 +) is as remarkable as it is unexpected. Whether the species evolved +in situ +, is a remnant population that persisted there following the extinction of other populations that had colonised the lowered shore line of the Bay of Plenty prior to the sea level rise that occurred at the end of the last glacial maximum, or has recently colonised the island from another as yet unrecognised mainland location remains to be determined. + + +In past literature + +Kunzea salterae + +has usually been recorded as + +Kunzea ericoides + +(e.g., +Parris 1971 +(as + +Leptospermum ericoides + +); +Ogle 1990 +; +Smale 1994 +). However, plants found growing within the geothermally active part of the island have also been referred to +Kunzea ericoides var. microflora +(= + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +of this revision) ( +Wildlands Consultants Limited 2005 +) probably because of their low stature, apparent habitat preferences, and the widely held but largely mistaken belief (see + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +) that any decumbent + +Kunzea + +found near active fumaroles was that variety. + + + +Kunzea salterae + +has some similarity to + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +. In particular the ability to grow in geothermal habitats (Fig. +24C +), the characteristically multi-trunked growth habit, broadly spreading canopy, and numerous rather fine, often pendulous branches and branchlets are typical of both species, while the abundance of short, divergent branchlet hairs (Fig. +23A-E +) is shared otherwise only with the allied + +Kunzea serotina + +. + +Kunzea salterae + +, like + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +, has a tendency to produce numerous semi-erect, somewhat trailing or completely decumbent plants in the vicinity of or around active fumaroles (Fig. +24C +). From + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +, + +Kunzea salterae + +is distinguished by its longer (up to 18 mm cf. up to 10 mm), linear-lanceolate (Fig. +22A, C-G +) rather than oblanceolate to obovate leaves, by its slightly larger (range 2.1-3.8 mm long) and glabrate, rather than small (range 1.8-3.1 mm long) and puberulent, narrowly obconic to funnelform (Fig. +22I-J +) rather than cupular to campanulate hypanthium, by its flat, narrowly capitate rather than slightly domed centrally depressed stigma (Fig. +22K +), and by the non-testiculate, deeply furrowed thecae (Fig. +22L +). Only one mitotic count was obtained from + +Kunzea salterae + +and this matched + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +, + +Kunzea serotina + +and + +Kunzea toelkenii + +in having uniformly small chromosome complements. Further observations using different plants are needed to confirm this. + + +Aside from + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +, the narrowly linear-lanceolate foliage of + +Kunzea salterae + +is similar to that of + +Kunzea linearis + +and + +Kunzea ericoides + +. However, the shorter glabrate leaves of + +Kunzea salterae + +are distinct from the leaves of + +Kunzea linearis + +, and branchlet hairs of + +Kunzea salterae + +are short and divergent rather than long, silky and antrorse. Further, the inflorescences of + +Kunzea salterae + +are corymbiform rather than spiciform, and the individual flowers are distinctly pedicellate, never sessile to subsessile. Both species are also allopatric, the nearest occurrence of + +Kunzea linearis + +to + +Kunzea salterae + +being the Tairua Peninsula on the eastern side of the Coromandel Peninsula some 145 km north-west of Moutohora. + + + +Kunzea salterae + +can be distinguished from + +Kunzea ericoides + +by its copiously hairy branchlets furnished with much longer divergent hairs than are on + +Kunzea salterae + +branchlets. Further both species are allopatric and have different ITS and ETS sequences (Table +2 +). + + +On Moutohora, + + +Kunzea +salterae + + +is sympatric with + +Kunzea robusta + +, (e.g., P. J. de Lange 6473 & P. B. Cashmore (AK 289818)), which grows locally on the southern slopes of Summit Hill. The typically multitrunked, pendulous growth habit, consistently narrow linear-lanceolate leaves, and abundance of short, divergent branchlet hairs easily distinguish + +Kunzea salterae + +from + +Kunzea robusta + +, which has long, silky, antrorse-appressed, branchlet hairs. + +Kunzea robusta + +is the less common of the two species on Moutohora, and is absent from sites of geothermal activity there. + + + +Kunzea salterae + +appears to combine the narrow linear leaves typical of + +Kunzea linearis + +, with the growth habit of + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +. Interestingly, artificial F1 hybrids (see +de Lange et al. 2005 +) using + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +as the pistillate parent, (e.g. P. J. de Lange 5816 (AK 285268)), are a close morphological match for + +Kunzea salterae + +. Based on current herbarium and field evidence, + +Kunzea linearis + +is not known from the Bay of Plenty (see above). Nevertheless, the extremely similar morphology exhibited between the aforementioned F1 hybrids and + +Kunzea salterae + +is rather striking. Further research into the possible hybrid origin of + +Kunzea salterae + +, particularly whether it is derived from past hybridism between + +Kunzea linearis + +and + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +, would be worthwhile. + + +The rDNA ITS and ETS sequence data (Table +2 +) showed that + +Kunzea salterae + +was most similar to + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +( +de Lange 2007 +). Otherwise, despite its narrow linear-leaves, it consistently clustered with the other +'small-leaved' + +Kunzea + +, + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +, + +Kunzea toelkenii + +and + +Kunzea serotina + +( +de Lange 2007 +). ETS sequence data also indicated a relationship with + +Kunzea ericoides + +, + +Kunzea linearis + +, + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +, + +Kunzea toelkenii + +, + +Kunzea serotina + +and Mt Egmont samples of + +Kunzea robusta + +all of which share a guanine/cytosine mix ( +de Lange 2007 +; +de Lange et al. 2010 +). Otherwise + +Kunzea salterae + +differs from all other + +Kunzea + +taxa within the + +Kunzea ericoides + +complex by having a unique cytosine/thiamine mix in its ITS-2 sequence (Table +2 +; see also +de Lange 2007 +; +de Lange et al. 2010 +). + + +The identity of + +Kunzea + +on Tuhua (Mayor Island) was discussed by +de Lange (2007) +who noted that one collection from the 'crater +rim' +of that island (AK 262432, +G. W. Mason s.n. +), approached + +Kunzea salterae + +in general branching habit, leaf shape and size, and by the numerous small, corymbiform inflorescences. Although this specimen was in poor condition, +de Lange (2007) +noted that the branchlet indumentum comprised mainly fine, somewhat wispy, appressed antrorse hairs, and that the anthers lacked the deep furrow and fused +'pinched' +ridge typical of + +Kunzea salterae + +. Subsequent field work on that island has shown that the + +Kunzea + +there forms a uniform population matching the 'eastern North Island +variant' +of + +Kunzea robusta + +which is common on the adjacent eastern side of the Coromandel Peninsula (see below) ( +Wilcox et al. 2012 +). + + + +Ecology. + + + +Kunzea +salterae + + +is a widespread and at times dominant woody shrub or tree of the coastal forest, geothermal field, cobble beach and sand dune vegetation of Moutohora (Fig. +24A-C +). As +Kunzea ericoides var. ericoides +, +Smale (1994) +described in detail the vegetation associations, population structure and dynamics of + +Kunzea salterae + +. He concluded (p. 441) that this species 'may replace itself indefinitely on the unstable dunes on Whale [Moutohora] Island, where the community is still +expanding' +. +Smale's +study was confined to + +Kunzea + +'heaths' +developed over sand dunes, and so he did not appraise the associations formed by + +Kunzea salterae + +within the geothermally active parts of Moutohora. From observations outside the sand dune habitat, I suggest that + +Kunzea salterae + +, being a species evidently favouring frequent disturbance, will also have a long standing presence in the geothermally active parts of Moutohora, where it is the dominant vascular plant species. Indeed, in its abundance and growth within the thermal areas on this island, it behaves very much as + +Kunzea tenuicaulis + +does in similar mainland habitats within the Taupo Volcanic Zone of the North Island ( +Burns 1997 +). + +Kunzea salterae + +is currently often the dominant canopy cover outside the sand dune and geothermal areas of Moutohora (Fig. +24B +), but it is expected to decline as the coastal forest regenerates and other larger, coastal forest species attain local dominance. + + +Smale (1994) +observed that the sand dune vegetation dominated by + +Kunzea salterae + +was species poor, recording 29 vascular plant taxa within what he regarded as +'older' +stands (i.e. ≥ 27 years of age). The same is the case for the thermal areas, where, aside from dense coverings of the mosses + +Isopterygium albescens + +(Hook.) A.Jaeger, + +Campylopus pyriformis + +, + +Dicranella dietrichiae + +( +Muell +.Hal.) A.Jaeger, + +Philonotis tenuis + +(Taylor) Reichardt and +Hypnum cupressiforme Hedw. var. cupressiforme +( +Beever and Brownsey 1990 +), vascular plants (other than + +Kunzea + +) are extremely scarce. Smale observed that inland from the dune systems his " +Kunzea ericoides var. ericoides +" stands changed from the multi-stemmed semi-prostrate growth habit (the + +Kunzea salterae + +of this treatment) to erect single-stemmed trees. From my observations this transition is not nearly as clear cut as he described, with + +Kunzea salterae + +growing in most situations across the island with a consistently multi-stemmed habit. However, occasional larger erect trees do occur toward the back of the dune systems at Boulder Bay and these are not + +Kunzea salterae + +but + +Kunzea robusta + +, a species that avoids thermal areas, and favours more stable habitats, overlying better developed soils, within the more mature successional coastal forest on the island. + + + +Hybridism. + +No putative wild hybrids have been observed on Moutohora, and putative hybrids were not evident in the 15 + +Kunzea + +herbarium specimens examined from that island. The distinctiveness of + +Kunzea salterae + +was recognised too late in this revision to include it in hybridisation experiments ( +de Lange et al. 2005 +). + + + +Vernacular name. + +No specific name for + +Kunzea salterae + +has been recorded. + + + +Conservation status. + +Currently the species, as +Kunzea aff. ericoides var. microflora +has been appropriately assessed by +de Lange et al. (2013b) +as 'At Risk / Naturally +Uncommon' +qualified +'IE' +(Island Endemic) and +'OL' +(One Location). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/39/02/373902F4F5453C9A2CB543156DFF1DA5.xml b/data/37/39/02/373902F4F5453C9A2CB543156DFF1DA5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b8c150e4322 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/39/02/373902F4F5453C9A2CB543156DFF1DA5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ + + + +New Coleoptera records from New Brunswick, Canada: Anthribidae, Brentidae, Dryophthoridae, Brachyceridae, and Curculionidae, with additions to the fauna of Quebec, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island + + + +Author + +Webster, Reginald P. + + + +Author + +Anderson, Robert S. + + + +Author + +Sweeney, Jon D. + + + +Author + +DeMerchant, Ian + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +179 + + +349 +406 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.179.2626 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.179.2626 +1313-2970-179-349 + + + + +Onychylis nigrirostris (Boheman, 1843) +Map 12 + + + +Material examined. + +New Brunswick, Queens Co., Grand Lake Meadows P.N.A., +45.8227°N +, +66.1209°W +, 17-30.VIII.2011, C. Hughes & R. P. Webster, old silver maple forest with green ash and seasonally flooded marsh, Lindgren funnel trap (1, RWC). + + + +Map 12. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of +Onychylis nigrirostris + + + + +Collection and habitat data. + +Onychylis +spp. are associated with pickerelweed ( +Pontederia cordata +L.) and pond lilies ( +Nuphar +species) ( +Anderson 1993 +). The specimen from New Brunswick was captured during August in a Lindgren funnel trap in an old silver maple swamp near a seasonally flooded marsh. + + + +Distribution in Canada and Alaska. + +ON, QC, NB, NS( +McNamara 1991c +; +Majka et al. 2007c +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/39/0C/37390C12B1B65066BDC8173EA08EDC11.xml b/data/37/39/0C/37390C12B1B65066BDC8173EA08EDC11.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..349317bb95a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/39/0C/37390C12B1B65066BDC8173EA08EDC11.xml @@ -0,0 +1,266 @@ + + + +Revision of the leachella group of Megachile subgenus Eutricharaea in the Western Palaearctic (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae): A renewed plea for DNA barcoding type material + + + +Author + +Praz, Christophe J. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2649-3141 +University of Neuchatel, Neuchatel, Switzerland & InfoFauna - Swiss Zoological Records Center, Neuchatel, Switzerland +christophe.praz@unine.ch + + + +Author + +Benon, Dimitri +University of Neuchatel, Neuchatel, Switzerland + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2023 + +2023-02-17 + + +95 + + +143 +198 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.95.96796 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.95.96796 +1314-2607-95-143 +0AD4F90A9A41492D84C3C0AA1B8C275B +DE2EC0A557FC5F3D9AD2D4435824AA7B + + + + +Megachile viridicollis Morawitz, 1875 + + + + +Figs 67-70 + + + + +Megachile viridicollis +Morawitz, 1875: 117, ♂, +"poimat +tolko +raz +v +stepi +Kizil +kum +15 +maya +u +vostochnoi +okrainy +gory +Karak +[Caught only once in the steppe of Kyzyl Kum, the 15. May, at the eastern edge of the mountain Karak; Kyzyl Kum does not refer to the Kyzyl Kum Desert, but probably to the locality +Қyzylқұm +, approx. 41.911N 67.988E, Kazakhstan]". + + + +Material examined. + + + +Type +material. + +We were not able to examine the +type +material of + +M. viridicollis + +. The placement of this species into the + +Megachile concinna + +complex is based on the original description, which mentions that the species is highly similar to " + +M. argentata + +" (either + +M. pilidens + +or + +M. leachella + +), but markedly larger, and with a conspicuous tooth at the base of the mandible. We interpret this tooth as the tooth present just behind the base of the mandible (as in Fig. +12 +). We also examined +one male +specimen identified as + +M. viridicollis + +from " +Baigakum +bei Djulek Turkest. [ +Kazakhstan +: +Baygekum +, +Zholek +; approx. +44.314 N +66.475 E +]", identified by +L. Wollmann +(who possibly had access to material identified as + +M. viridicollis + +by +Morawitz +) and perfectly agreeing with the original description of + +M. viridicollis + +. +Baygekum +is located approximately +200 km +NE of the +type +locality of + +M. viridicollis + + +. + + + +Other material. + +Eight specimens from +Kazakhstan +and +Uzbekistan +(Suppl. material 1). + + + +Description. +The following description is based on one male specimen from Baygekum and several female specimens from Gazli, Uzbekistan, presumed to be conspecific. + +Male +: Member of the + +Megachile concinna + +complex, as determined by the presence of the tooth behind the mandibular base and the apically simple genitalia. OOD as in European populations of + +M. anatolica + +(as in Fig. +11 +), thus nearly as long as interocellar distance. Vestiture particularly long and dense, in particular tergal fasciae thicker and longer. Larger than all other species of the + +Megachile concinna + +-complex (body length 10 mm). + + +Female +: similar to + +M. anatolica + +, differs from that species in the following characteristics: larger (body length 11 mm). Vertex laterally covered with short, brownish hairs, so that integument is not visible under vestiture unless the hairs are removed (Fig. +70 +); punctation dense and fine (Fig. +70 +). Clypeus apically without teeth, broadly emarginated (as in + +M. pilidens + +) but with a conspicuous, rounded, thickened margin, medially with a small tooth (Fig. +69 +). Metasoma with snow white vestiture forming particularly dense tergal fasciae and entirely covering the base of T6. Punctation of disc of T4 sparse (Fig. +68 +), similar to European populations of + +M. anatolica + +(Fig. +8 +). + + + +Figures 67-70. + +Megachile viridicollis + +67 +female metasoma +68 +female metasomal tergum 4 +69 +apex of female clypeus +70 +female vertex. + + + + +Distribution. +So far known only from few specimens from Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. + + +Geographic variation and note. + +The identity of this taxon remains unclear, as very little material has been studied. +Soltani et al. (2017) +presented sequence data for two populations, one based on several male specimens from the region of Khiva, Uzbekistan (41.33N, 60.35E and 41.36N, 60.35E), and one based on several female specimens from Gazli, Uzbekistan (40.383N, 63.100E); these two populations were genetically strongly divergent (4.1 %). The male specimens from the Khiva region are markedly smaller than the male examined from Baygekum (see above), while the females from Gazli are particularly large for the + +Megachile concinna + +complex. It is possible that the populations from Khiva represent transitional populations to + +M. anatolica + +. Additional research including more material from Central Asia is needed to better delineate this species. + +Megachile viridicollis + +and + +M. anatolica + +are genetically closely related, and both may be treated as conspecific, in which case the name + +M. viridicollis + +would have priority. The striking differences in female morphology lead us to treat both taxa are distinct species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/39/89/3739893B602937C0F0F71B54057E8F50.xml b/data/37/39/89/3739893B602937C0F0F71B54057E8F50.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..353ab2d1b7d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/39/89/3739893B602937C0F0F71B54057E8F50.xml @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ + + + +Sulawesimetopushenryi, a new genus and species of Isometopinae (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae) from Sulawesi + + + +Author + +Herczek, Aleksander + + + +Author + +Gorczyca, Jacek + + + +Author + +Taszakowski, Artur + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2018 + +796 + + +147 +161 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.796.21273 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.796.21273 +1313-2970-796-147 +4F976155162B4B2B94B43D9E08AAB487 +4F976155162B4B2B94B43D9E08AAB487 + + + + +Genus +Sulawesimetopus +gen. n. + + + +Type species. + +Sulawesimetopus henryi +sp. n. + + + +Diagnosis. + +Dorsum densely and deeply punctuate, with uniformly distributed dark-brown, semierect long setae. Head vertical, flattened in front, almost as high as pronotal disc, covering very narrow collar and very poorly marked calli (partly). Front and lateral parts of head strongly wrinkled and deeply punctuate, lateral edges of head with long, protruding setae (Fig. 2A). Eyes large, nearly at same level as vertex, producing concavity behind it. Fovea antennalis removed from ventral eye margin (Fig. 1 +A-C +). Antennal segments I and II of almost same thickness, III and IV thinner. All segments except 1st with white, adjacent setae of diameter not exceeding segment +thickness +(Fig. 2B). Labium reaching second abdominal segment. Pronotum with very weakly marked calli, narrow but distinct collar, narrow lateral carina and slightly convex posterior margin. Mesoscutum very narrow, scutellum strongly tumid, sunken basomedially (Fig. 1A, B). Exocorium, pro-, meso- and metapleuron densely and deeply punctuate. Mesofemora with five, metafemora with 6 trichobotria (Fig. 9 +A-D +). All tarsi two-segmented with second segments longer than 1st, incompletely divided (Fig. 5). Claws without subapical tooth (Fig. 6 A). Ostiolar peritreme occupying entire +lower +part of metepisternum and apical part of metafemur (Fig. 8B). Aedeagus delicate, endosoma sacciform and membranous, weakly sclerotized inside (Fig. 7D). Left paramere scythe-shaped, sensory lobe with several long setae; apical process elongated, expanded at middle with several tiny spikes; right paramere short, with knee-shaped sensory lobe, hypophysis with several tiny spikes (Fig. 7B, C). + + + +Figure 1. +S. henryi +, female (A) and male (B, C) dorsal and lateral view. + + + + +Figure 2. +S. henryi +, male, front of head (A), left antenna (B). + + + + +Figure 3. +S. henryi +sp.n., male, head, lateral view (A), +Astroscopometopus gryllocephalus +, male, head, lateral view (B). + + + + +Figure 4. +S. henryi +, male, 1st leg tarsus (A), legs: 1st (B), 2 nd(C), 3th(D). + + + + +Figure 5. +S. henryi +, male, 1st leg tarsus. + + + + +Figure 6. +S. henryi +, male, claw, 2nd leg (A), +Astroscopometopus gryllocephalus +, male, claws (B images taken by T. Yasunaga, courtesy of CSR Division, Hitachi High -Technologies Corporation, Tokyo). + + + + +Figure 7. +S. henryi +, male genitalia genital capsule (A), right paramere (B), left paramere (C), phallus (D). + + + + +Figure 8. +Astroscopometopus gryllocephalus +, male, ostiolar peritreme (A images taken by T. Yasunaga, courtesy of CSR Division, Hitachi Hig Male) B +S. henryi +, male, ostiolar peritreme. + + + + +Figure 9. +S. henryi +, male, femoral trichobothria. A, B mesofemora C, D metafemora. + + + + +Etymology. + +Name combines Sulawesi (the type locality) with part of the generic name +Isometopus +, the type genus of the subfamily. + + + +Remarks. + +Herczek (1993) +established +Gigantometopini +, one of four tribes belonging to +Isometopinae +. At that time, only one genus and species had been described: +Gigantometopus rossi +Schwartz & Schuh, 1990. This species is the largest known isometopine (6.98 mm). Distinctive features of this tribe include the size of body, distinct calli separated by a deep incision, a strongly swollen scutellum, a well-marked 1A on the clavus, 5 and 6 meso- and metafemoral trichobothria, 3-segmented tarsi and claws +without +a subapical tooth. +Gigantometopus schuhi +from Borneo, described by Akingbohungbe in 2012, is significantly smaller than +G. rossi +, but other features allow it to be placed in this genus. We agree with + +Akingbohungbe's +(2012) + +opinion that the large size is peculiar to the nominotypical species but not to the genus. Additionally, the genus +Astroscopometopus +, described by +Yasunaga and Hayashi (2002) +, has features similar to those of +Gigantometopus +Schwartz and Schuh, 1990 and +Isometopidea +Poppius, 1913. Also +Sulawesimetopus +resembles the genera +Gigatometopus +and +Isometopidea +, but differs from them in several basic features including deep and densely punctured dorsum and thorax pleurites, pronotum with slightly convex posterior margin and narrow lateral carina, extremely reduced calli, and the lack of a middle fossa. Other differences include a very narrow (or lack of) mesoscutum and an indistinct division of the 2nd and 3rd tarsomeres. In addition, +Sulawesimetopus +differs from +Isometopidea +Poppius by the shape of the head, placement of fovea antennalis, shorter claval commissure and shorter cuneus. These species, however, share numerous femoral trichobothria. Such a combination of characters allows the new genus and species to be assigned to +Gigantometopini +. However, as has been done by +Yasunaga et al. (2016) +, it is necessary to revise the suprageneric classification of the +Isometopinae +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/39/C3/3739C31A59701BB873C980048BD2B2EC.xml b/data/37/39/C3/3739C31A59701BB873C980048BD2B2EC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..34193e901ca --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/39/C3/3739C31A59701BB873C980048BD2B2EC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ + + + +The ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Strandzha Mountain and adjacent coastal territories (Bulgaria and Turkey) + + + +Author + +Kostova, Rumyana + + + +Author + +Gueorguiev, Borislav + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8135 +8135 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8135 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8135 +1314-2828--8135 + + + + +Chlaenius (Dinodes) decipiens (L. Dufour, 1820) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Kosti Vill. +; Record Level: bibliographicCitation: +Gueorguiev +& +Gueorguiev +(1995: 212) + + +Type status: +Other material +. Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Rezovo Vill. +; Record Level: bibliographicCitation: +Gueorguiev +& +Gueorguiev +(1995: 212) + + +Type status: +Other material +. Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Vizitsa Vill. +; Record Level: bibliographicCitation: +Gueorguiev +& +Gueorguiev +(1995: 212) + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: + +J. +Maran +& K. Taborsky + +; individualCount: +2 +; Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Maslen nos Cape +; Event: eventDate: +VI.1933 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +NMP (det. as Chlaenius decipiens ambiguus) + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +K. Tuleshkov +; individualCount: +1 +; Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Ahtopol +; Event: eventDate: +15/05/1930 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +NMNHS + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +P. Drenski +; individualCount: +1 +; Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Tsarevo (= Micurin) +; Event: eventDate: +07/06/1954 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +NMNHS + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/39/C7/3739C70143D564C6D50FC60935EFDA07.xml b/data/37/39/C7/3739C70143D564C6D50FC60935EFDA07.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a030f0ac809 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/39/C7/3739C70143D564C6D50FC60935EFDA07.xml @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ + + + +Revision of New World Helava Masner & Huggert (Platygastridae, Sceliotrachelinae) + + + +Author + +Talamas, Elijah J. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1048-6345 +Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA / ARS c / o USNM, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560, U. S. A. +billy.jenkins@GMAIL.COM + + + +Author + +Masner, Lubomir +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K. W. Neatby Building, Ottawa, Ontario K 1 A 0 C 6, Canada + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2016 + +2016-12-19 + + +53 + + +1 +24 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.53.10217 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.53.10217 +1314-2607-53-1 +13184D6320474F62A987B844E6386BCD +255935082C11B238FF99FFF1FFC4FF9E +575134 + + + + +Helava pygmea Masner & Talamas +sp. n. + + + + +Figures 40-44 + + + +Description. +Female body length: 0.94-1.54 mm (n=18). Male body length: 0.85-1.07 mm (n=7). Male antenna: apically clubbed. Number of antennomeres in male club: 3. Number of female clavomeres: 4. Setation of frons anterior to ocellar triangle: present. Setation of vertex posterior to lateral ocellus: dense. Hyperoccipital carina: absent. Pronotum in dorsal view: present mostly as lateral shoulders. Dorsoventral band of dense setation on posterior part of lateral pronotum: absent. Setation of pronotal cervical sulcus: uncertain, dense. Width of dorsal mesopleuron in lateral view: about equal ventrally and dorsally to 1.5 times as wide ventrally. Longitudinal striation on dorsal mesopleuron: absent. Transepisternal line: present. Mesofurcal pit: present. Notaulus: absent. Rs+M in fore wing: nebulous. Wings: macropterous. Rs+M in hind wing: nebulous. Color of legs: brownish, yellowish brown. Foamy structures of lateral propodeum: smaller than hairy metapleuron. Median tubercule on T2: present. Setation of anterior T2: interrupted medially. Lateral patch on T2: absent. Foamy structures on S1: absent. Transverse felt field on anterior S2: present as transverse strip. Shape of S2 in lateral view: broadly convex. + + +Diagnosis. + + +Helava pygmea + +is closest to + +H. simplex + +, with which it shares the presence of small propodeal foamy structures, fully developed wings, and a mesoscutum without notauli. The only character that reliably separates these species is the form of the basal vein (Rs+M) in the fore wing: darkly pigmented in + +H. pygmea + +and absent in + +H. simplex + +. + + + +Etymology. + +The species name " +Helava pygmea +" refers to the small size of the body in this species. + + + +Link to distribution map. +http://hol.osu.edu/map-large.html?id=354391 + + +Material examined. + + +Holotype +, female: + +ECUADOR + +: +Napo Prov. +, below +Papallacta +, + +3000m + +, +17.II.1983 +, +L. Masner +, USNMENT00989208 (deposited in CNCI) + +. + + +Paratypes + +: ( +20 females +, +9 males +) + +CHILE + + +: + +1 male +, USNMENT00989196 (CNCI). + +COLOMBIA + + +: + +11 females +, +4 males +, CNC424746, 424748, 424754-424756, 424758-424763, 424768-424771 (CNCI). + +ECUADOR + + +: + +5 females +, +3 males +, CNC424747, 424749-424751, 424764, 424766-424767, USNMENT00989207 (CNCI). + +VENEZUELA + + +: +4 females +, +1 male +, CNC424752-424753, 424757, 424765, 424942 (CNCI). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3A/D2/373AD26035E55DE88C1F496B981C165A.xml b/data/37/3A/D2/373AD26035E55DE88C1F496B981C165A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4d80129413c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3A/D2/373AD26035E55DE88C1F496B981C165A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,383 @@ + + + +Review of the Neotropical water scavenger beetle genus Tobochares Short & Garcia, 2007 (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae, Acidocerinae): new lineages, new species, and new records + + + +Author + +Giron, Jennifer C. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0851-6883 +Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA & Natural Science Research Laboratory, Museum of Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA + + + +Author + +Short, Andrew Edward Z. +Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Division of Entomology, Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA +aezshort@ku.edu + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2021 + +2021-02-22 + + +1019 + + +93 +140 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1019.59881 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1019.59881 +1313-2970-1019-93 +740EFFB93ADA4B2ABD23A839AAE71FB2 +68E025484FB95656A3666768A4D97EF1 + + + + +Tobochares arawak +sp. nov. +Figs 3C, E +, 10A-C +, 11M +, 13 +, 15A, B + + + +Type material examined. + + +Holotype +(male) + +: "Guyana: Region VIII: +5°0.730'N +, +59°38.965'W +; 585 m; Upper Potaro Camp I; ca. 7 Km NW of Chenapau; top of falls on Potaro River; seeps with roots and algae; 12.iii.2014; leg. Short, Salisbury, La Cruz; GY14-0312-01B" (CBDG). + +Paratypes +(127 exs.): Guyana: Region VIII + +: Same data as holotype (127, CBDG, SEMC). + + + +Differential diagnosis. + + +Tobochares arawak + +can be recognized by its strongly convex body in lateral view (Fig. +10B +), accompanied by elytral punctation uniform in size and degree of impression, with serial punctures seemingly aligned in rows, not impressed to form grooves (Fig. +10A +); the interserial punctures are somewhat irregularly distributed in two or three rows (Fig. +10A +). The general habitus and punctation of + +T. arawak + +are similar to those of + +T. canaima + +, + +T. kappel + +, and + +T. kolokoe + +. In + +T. kappel + +and + +T. kolokoe + +the interserial punctures form only one or two irregular rows (Fig. +3H +). In + +T. canaima + +(Fig. +10D +) the pronotal and elytral punctations are sharper than in + +T. arawak + +and the apodemes of the median lobe are one fourth the length of the median lobe in + +T. canaima + +(Fig. +11N +), as opposed to half as long in + +T. arawak + +(Fig. +11M +). + + + +Figure 10. +Habitus of + +Tobochares + +spp. in the + +Tobochares communis + +species group +A-C + +T. arawak + +A +dorsal view +B +lateral view +C +ventral view +D-F + +T. canaima + +D +dorsal view +E +lateral view +F +ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm. + + + + +Figure 11. +Aedeagi of + +Tobochares + +spp. +A + +T. benettii + +B + +T. goias + +C + +T. fusus + +D + +T. luteomargo + +E + +T. pemon + +F + +T. anthonyae + +G + +T. atures + +H + +T. communis + +I + +T. microps + +J + +T. romanoae + +K + +T. akoerio + +L + +T. kappel + +M + +T. arawak + +N + +T. canaima + +. Scale bars: 0.5 mm ( +A-D +); 0.1 mm ( +E-N +). + + + + +Description. + +Size and form +: Body length 1.6-1.8 mm. Body elongate oval, strongly convex (Fig. +10A, B +). +Color and punctation +: Dorsal and ventral surfaces of body dark brown, with lateral margins of prothorax and elytra only slightly paler (Fig. +10A, B +); mouthparts yellow, with slightly darker apical third of maxillary palpomere IV; antennae brown; legs reddish to dark brown with paler tarsi (Fig. +10C +). Ground punctation on head, pronotum and elytra moderately marked (Fig. +10A, B +). +Head +: Eyes in dorsal view with anterior margin oblique (anteriorly directed), and outer margins slightly bulging from outline of head; in lateral view, eyes not emarginate (see Fig. +2E +). +Thorax +: Elytra with slightly defined rows of shallow serial punctures, not forming grooves (Fig. +10A +); interserial punctures somewhat irregularly distributed in two or three rows (Fig. +3I +). Elevation of mesoventrite forming a very low transverse carina (Fig. +10C +). Metaventrite with distinct median, longitudinal, narrow glabrous area extending along posterior half (Fig. +10C +). +Abdomen +: Abdominal ventrites uniformly and densely pubescent. Aedeagus (Fig. +11M +). Basal piece 0.4 +x +the length of a paramere; parameres nearly 1/3 as narrow as greatest width of median lobe, with outer margins widely and uniformly convex, and rounded apex; median lobe roughly triangular, rounded and slightly pinched at apex; gonopore situated nearly at midlength of median lobe. + + + +Etymology. +Noun in apposition. Named after the Arawak, an indigenous tribe of northern South America. + + +Distribution. + + +Tobochares arawak + +is only known from the Upper Potaro region in Guyana. See Fig. +13 +. + + + +Life history. + +This species was collected in a wet seepage area along rocks at the margin of the Upper Potaro River. Specimens were collected by pulling back root mats and moss that were growing over the wet rock areas. See Fig. +15A, B +. + + + +Figure 12. +Distribution of + +Tobochares + +spp., including all previous (red) and new (yellow) records. + + + + +Figure 13. +Distribution of + +Tobochares + +spp. + + + + +Figure 14. + +Tobochares + +habitat in Brazil +A, B +type locality and habitat for + +T. benettii + +, seepage near Rio Preto de Eva (collecting event BR17-0610-01A) +C +type locality and habitat for + +T. goias + +, margin of Balneario Lejas (collecting event BR18-0304-02B) +D +habitat of + +T. kusad + +and + +T. sipaliwini + +, State of Roraima, near Usina de +Jatapu +reservoir (collecting Event BR18-0117-01A) +E +habitat and type locality of + +T. romanoae + +, and habitat of + +T. sipaliwini + +, State of Roraima, Serra do +Tepequem +, Igarape Preto Negro, Cachoeira Leje Preta (collecting event BR18-0114-04B) +F +type locality and habitat of + +T. fusus + +, State of +Amapa +, Calcoene (collecting event BR18-0721-02B). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3B/06/373B06594608582BA62ED1A55886607D.xml b/data/37/3B/06/373B06594608582BA62ED1A55886607D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a08cc7db7d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3B/06/373B06594608582BA62ED1A55886607D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@ + + + +Multigene phylogeny and morphology reveal three new species of Cytospora isolated from diseased plant branches in Fengtai District, Beijing, China + + + +Author + +Jia, Aoli +https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0265-5454 +State Key Laboratory of Efficient Production of Forest Resources, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China + + + +Author + +Chen, Baoyue +Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China + + + +Author + +Lu, Hongyan +Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China + + + +Author + +Xing, Yu +Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China + + + +Author + +Li, Bin +Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China + + + +Author + +Fan, Xinlei +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4946-4442 +State Key Laboratory of Efficient Production of Forest Resources, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China +xinleifan@bjfu.edu.cn + +text + + +MycoKeys + + +2024 + +2024-01-18 + + +101 + + +163 +189 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.101.116272 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.101.116272 +1314-4049-101-163 +B3407E32182D54A38A90C118F97C94A5 + + + + +Cytospora fengtaiensis A.L. Jia & X.L. Fan +sp. nov. + + + + +Fig. 6 + + + +Etymology. +Named after the place where it was first collected, Fengtai District, Beijing City. + + +Typification. + +China. Beijing City, Fengtai District, Qianling Mountain scenic area, +39°51'12.28"N +, +116°5'17.74"E +, from branches of + +Acer palmatum + +' + +Atropurpureum + +', 7 Apr 2023, A.L. Jia & X.L. Fan (holotype BJFC CF20230405, ex-holotype living culture CFCC 59449); +39°51'12.51"N +, +116°5'17.32"E +, from branches of + +Acer palmatum + +' + +Atropurpureum + +', 7 Apr 2023, A.L. Jia & X.L. Fan (paratype BJFC CF20230406, ex-paratype living culture CFCC 59442. + + + +Description. + +Sexual morph +: not observed. + +Asexual morph +: +Conidiomata pycnidial + +, immersed in the bark, scattered, producing black area on bark, circular to ovoid, with multiple locules, occasionally slightly erumpent through the surface. +Conceptacle +absent. +Ectostromatic disc +conspicuous, grey to black, discoid, circular to ovoid, 180-250 +µm +in diam., producing one ostiole per disc when mature. +Ostiole +grey to black, nearly at the same level as the disc surface, 70-105 +µm +in diam. Locules numerous, subdivided frequently by invaginations with common walls, circular to ovoid, 560-800 +µm +in diam. +Conidiophores +hyaline, unbranched, approximately cylindrical, 11-17 +x +1.5-2 (av. = 14.7 ++/- +2.7 +x +1.6 ++/- +0.3, n = 50) +µm +. +Conidiogenous cells +enteroblastic, phialidic. +Conidia +hyaline, elongate-allantoid, smooth, aseptate, 5-6 +x +1-2 (av. = 5.5 ++/- +0.5 +x +1.6 ++/- +0.2, n = 50) +µm +. + + + +Culture characteristics. + +Cultures on PDA are initially white to pale vinaceous, growing slowly up to 3 cm after 3 d and entirely covering the 6 cm Petri dish after 7 d, becoming fawn after 14 d. Colonies are flat with a uniform texture, Colony margin irregular. After 30 d, +pycnidia +aggregated on surface. + + + +Figure 6. + +Cytospora fengtaiensis + +from + +Acer palmatum + +' + +Atropurpureum + +' (BJFC CF20230405) +A, B +habit of conidiomata on branch +C +transverse section through conidiomata +D +longitudinal section through conidiomata +E +conidiophores and conidiogenous cells +F +conidia. Scale bars: 1 mm ( +A +); 200 +µm +( +B-D +); 10 +µm +( +E, F +). + + + + +Additional materials examined. + + +China +. +Beijing +City +, +Fengtai District +, +Qianling Mountain +scenic area, +39°51'11.45"N +, +116°5'15.36"E +, from branches of + +Acer palmatum + +' + +Atropurpureum + +', +7 Apr 2023 +, +A.L. Jia +& +X.L. Fan +(BJFC CF20230407, living culture CFCC 59525; BJFC CF20230408, living cultures CFCC 59526 and 59527) + +. + + + +Notes. + + +Cytospora fengtaiensis + +is associated with canker disease of + +Acer palmatum + +' + +Atropurpureum + +' in the current study. It can be identified by its conidiomata producing larger black areas on bark. Phylogenetically, five isolates in this study formed a distinct lineage in the phylogenetic trees of each individual gene (ITS, +act +, +rpb2 +, +tef1-α +and +tub2 +) and the combined gene dataset (Fig. +2 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3B/52/373B522A7E005292A9EE2E89E09BD87B.xml b/data/37/3B/52/373B522A7E005292A9EE2E89E09BD87B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..692d577d9e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3B/52/373B522A7E005292A9EE2E89E09BD87B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,399 @@ + + + +Aristolochia vallisicola (Aristolochiaceae), a new species from Peninsular Malaysia + + + +Author + +Yao, Tze Leong +Forest Research Institute Malaysia, 52109 Kepong, Selangor, Malaysia +yaotzeleong@frim.gov.my + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2012 + +2012-07-26 + + +14 + + +15 +22 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.14.3354 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.14.3354 +1314-2003-14-15 +4E020970FFF6902A2342AC3DFF90FFCF +576132 + + + + +Aristolochia vallisicola T.L.Yao +sp. nov. +Figures 1 +3 + + + +Note. + +This species differs from all other Peninsular Malaysian + +Aristolochia + +L. species in its lamina with pinnate lateral veins, inflorescence with a long peduncle, its disc-shaped perianth limb, annulated hairy perianth mouth and 3-lobed gynostemium. This species is similar to + +Aristolochia coadunata + +Backer in the lanceolate or oblanceolate lamina with pinnate lateral veins but differs in its larger disc-shaped perianth limb, 58-65 mm diam. versus 15-30 mm diam. in + +Aristolochia coadunata + +and its longer peduncle, 15.5-17 cm long versus up to 2 cm long in + +Aristolochia coadunata + +. This species is also similar to + +Aristolochia versicolor + +S.M.Huang in the lanceolate or oblanceolate lamina with pinnate lateral veins but differs in its longer petiole, 2.5-7 cm long versus 1-2 cm long, broader leaves, at least 7.5 cm wide versus to 6.5 cm wide, and longer peduncle, 15.5-17 cm long versus 2-3(-10) cm long in + +Aristolochia versicolor + +. The summary and other characters comparison is presented in +Table 1 +. + + +Type. +Peninsular Malaysia +. Pahang: Genting Highlands, Awana Waterfall. 26 November 1999 (fl), R.Kiew 4879 (holotype SING!, barcode 78162). + + + +Table 1. +Comparison of + +Aristolochia vallisicola + +, + +Aristolochia coadunata + +and + +Aristolochia versicolor + +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Characters + +Aristolochia vallisicola + + +* + +Aristolochia coadunata + + +** + +Aristolochia versicolor + +(China) + +*** + +Aristolochia versicolor + +(Thailand) +
Petiole length; indumentum2.5-7 cm long; puberulous3-9 cm long; pubescent1-2 cm long; sparsely pilose1-2 cm long; adpressed hairy
Lamina; length by width (cm) +lanceolate, oblanceolate or broadly oblanceolate; 15-24 +x +7.5-14 + +ovate oblong to lanceolate, rarely ovate; 7.5-33 +x +4-12 + +narrowly elliptic to lanceolate-elliptic; 14-25 +x +4-6.5 + +oblanceolate, oblong-oblanceolate, or elliptic oblong; 11.2-17.5 +x +3.4-4.7 +
Lamina base; sinus depth (mm)cordate; 2-3cordate; 5-10narrowly auriculate; 5-7narrowly, slightly cordate
Pinnate lateral vein pairs6-74-69-107-8
Inflorescencecauline; peduncle 15.5-17 cm long, divided into 4-5 internodes of different lengthsin axils of foliage leaves, rarely cauline; peduncle up to 2 cm longin axils of foliage leaves, peduncle 2-3 cm longin axils of foliage leaves, peduncle ca 10 cm long
Bract indumentumpilosepuberulous-pilose
Perianth +tube geniculately curved, utricle cylindric, ca 30 +x +8 mm, tube ca 35 +x +8 mm; limb disc-shaped, 58-65 mm diam., 3-lobed, mouth annulate + +tube geniculately curved, utricle ovoid tubular, 35-30 +x +7 mm, tube cylindric, 30-45 +x +6 mm, limb disc-shaped, 15-30 mm diam., obscurely 3-lobed, mouth not annulate + +tube geniculately curved, basal portion of tube 30-40 +x +6-8 mm; limb disc-shaped, 40-60 mm diam., 3-lobed, mouth annulate + +tube geniculately curved, utricle ovoid, 8-10 +x +8-12 mm, tube ca 13-23 +x +5-7 mm; limb disc-shaped, 46-50 mm diam. +
+Distribution +Peninsular Malaysia +Sumatra, Java, †Peninsular Malaysia ( +Hou 1984 +; +Igarashi and Fukuda 1999 +) + +China: Guangdong, Guangxi, Yunnan ( +Huang et al. 2003 +) + +North Eastern Thailand ( +Phuphathanaphong 1987 +) +
+ + + +* Images of Backer 26130 (L), Bosscha s.n.(BO-108722) (BO), Schouten s.n. (BO-108723 & BO-108735) (BO),van Steenis 4317, 7326, 12625 (L) seen. Comparison also based on species description and drawings ( +Backer 1920 +; +Hou 1984 +, fig. 12; +van Steenis 2006 +, colour plate 4). + + + + +** Type specimen could not be located. Comparison based on species description and line drawings ( +Hwang 1981 +, fig. 4; +Huang et al. 2003 +, fig. 222, 4-6). + + + + +*** Comparison based on images of Beusekom and Phengklai 2985 (L) and its line drawing, and species description ( +Phuphathanaphong 1987 +, fig. 13). + + + + +† Igarashi and Fukuda (1997) recognised + +Aristolochia coadunata + +as occurring in Peninsular Malaysia and mentioned that it is one of the food plants of + +Parides (Atrophaneura) sycorax + +. I have not seen any + +Aristolochia coadunata + +specimens from Peninsular Malaysia. + + + + +Description. + +Slender climber. Stem ca 2.5 mm thick, surface shallowly furrowed, sometimes smooth, puberulent, trichomes hooked. +Leaves: +petiole twisted, 2.5-7 cm long, ca 2.5 mm thick, puberulent, indumentum a mix of hooked and straight hairs; lamina lanceolate or narrowly oblanceolate or oblanceolate, 15-24 +x +7.5-14 cm; base cordate, auricles rounded, sinus 2-3 mm deep, 8-12 mm wide, margin entire, apex acute; leathery; lamina surface above glabrescent, with scattered black gland dots, lamina surface below puberulent, indumentum a mix of longer straight and shorter hooked hairs; midrib above sunken, below prominent; lateral veins pinnate, above faint, below prominent, basal pair 1, pinnate pairs 5-7; intercostal veins net-like. +Inflorescences +cauline +, solitary; peduncle branched once; 15.5-17 cm long, ca 2 mm thick, puberulent, indumentum mainly of hooked trichomes, scattered with long spreading hairs. Bracts ovate, ca 3 +x +1.5 mm, pubescence, base cuneate, apex acute. +Flowers: +pedicel ca 40 mm long, ovary ca 13 +x +2 mm, villous; perianth glossy, greyish pale orange with purple tinge, purple beneath, ca 6.5 cm long, outer surface sparsely villose with shorter hooked trichomes, tube geniculately curved, utricle cylindric, ca 30 +x +8 mm, inner surface with a glistening white patch of stellate trichomes, perianth tube ca 35 +x +8 mm, limb disc-shaped, 5.8-6.5 cm diam., 3-lobed, venation faint, mouth annulate, villous; gynostemium in transverse section faintly trigonal; stamens 6, anthers ca 3 +x +0.3 mm; stigmatic lobes 3, conical, ca 0.8 mm long, apex blunt. +Fruit +and +seed +unknown. + + + +Figure 1. +Distribution of + +Aristolochia vallisicola + +(●). + + + + +Figure 2. +Type specimen of + +Aristolochia vallisicola + +(Kiew RK 4879, SING, barcode 78162). + + + + +Figure 3. + +Aristolochia vallisicola + +T.L. Yao, +A +insertion of an inflorescence in axil of petiole scar at thickened stem node +B +villous inflorescence bract +C +annulated perianth mouth +D +an inflorescence with an opened flower +E +flower bud +F +gynostemium. (All from Kiew RK 4879.) + + + + +Vernacular name. + +Akar telinga berok +(Malay). + + + +Distribution. + + +Aristolochia vallisicola + +isendemic in Peninsular Malaysia, Pahang. It has only been found on Titiwangsa Range and its vicinities. + + + +Ecology. +Thisspecies occurs in highland valleys of lower montane forest about 1000 m altitude and often by rocky streamsides. Specimens with flowers werecollected in September and November. + + +Etymology. + +The species name +vallisicola +denotes its habitat preference for valleys. + + + +Conservation status. +Least Concern. This species occurs above 1000 m altitude, a habitat which is protected by Malaysian legislation. + + +Specimens examined. +Peninsular Malaysia, Pahang: Ulu Kelau, Raub, 24 September 1929 (fl), Kalong FMS 20248 (KEP, barcode 196080); Genting Tea Estate, R. Kiew s.n. (KEP, barcode 196081). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3B/87/373B87F8FFF9001FACAC7C22498EFD5E.xml b/data/37/3B/87/373B87F8FFF9001FACAC7C22498EFD5E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d5604cb682f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3B/87/373B87F8FFF9001FACAC7C22498EFD5E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,421 @@ + + + +Dicharax (?) candrakirana n. sp. (Gastropoda: Cyclophoridae) from Sempu Island, Indonesia + + + +Author + +Nurinsiyah, Ayu Savitri + + + +Author + +Hausdorf, Bernhard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-13 + + +4363 + + +4 + + +589 +591 + + + +journal article +31172 +10.11646/zootaxa.4363.4.12 +5e7426db-618e-4be0-818a-0f1b4e11539b +1175-5326 +1114811 +90765905-FD57-4412-BE16-01DF1E04E6D5 + + + + + + + +Dicharax +Kobelt & Möllendorff, 1900 + + + + + + + +Dicharax + +(?) + +candrakirana + +n. sp. + + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Dicharax + +(?) + +candrakirana + + +n. sp. + +is characterized by a small, depressed conical shell, with a smooth protoconch and an irregularly striated teleoconch, with spiral striae especially around the umbilicus, and with a short sutural tube about a quarter of a whorl posterior to the aperture from which 5–9 radial microtunnels extend. + + + +Shell ( +Fig. 1 +). + +Depressed conical; with 3 whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch low, smooth. Teleoconch irregularly striated, especially at the bottom side around the umbilicus with spiral striae, less distinct spiral striae are present also on the upper side close to the suture. Color whitish; subtranslucent. Last whorl rounded, with an indistinct constriction about a quarter of a whorl posterior to the aperture; posterior to the constriction with a short ( +0.25–0.3 mm +long) sutural tube; below the tube with 5–9 radial microtunnels. Aperture almost circular, not crenulated; upper insertion of the peristome descending towards aperture; insertions of the peristome connected by a thick callus; peristome expanded, but not reflexed, strongly thickened inside. Umbilicus wide, eccentric. + + +Measurements (n = 8): shell diameter D: 2.0– +2.2 mm +, mean 2.1 + +0.05 mm +; shell height H: +1.25–1.3 mm +, mean 1.25 + +0.05 mm +; aperture (outer peristome) diameter da: +0.85–0.9 mm +, mean 0.85 + 0.0 mm; aperture height ha: +0.85–0.9 mm +, mean 0.85 + 0.0 mm; D/H: 1.63–1.71, mean 1.67 + 0.03. + + + + +Remarks. +Kobelt (1902) +classified + +Dicharax + +and + +Chamalycaeus +Möllendorff, 1897 + +as subgenera of + +Alycaeus +Gray, 1850 + +and distinguished + +Dicharax + +from + +Chamalycaeus + +by the position of the constriction and the presence of a swelling near the aperture. In contrast, + +Páll-Gergely +et al. +( +2017 +) + +classified these two taxa as genera and distinguished + +Chamalycaeus + +from + +Dicharax + +based on the presence of elevated spiral striations on the teleoconch. Whereas + +D. candrakirana + + +n. sp. + +would be classified in + +Chamalycaeus + +according to the diagnosis of +Kobelt (1902) +, its classification is more problematic with regard to the classification of + +Páll-Gergely +et al. +(2017) + +. There are distinct spiral lines at the bottom side around the umbilicus and less distinct spiral lines on the upper side close to the suture. However, the spiral lines are not elevated ridges as in + +Chamalycaeus + +. + +Páll-Gergely +et al. +(2017) + +found spiral striations also in a population of + +Dicharax depressus +(Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1912) + +of +Vietnam +, which they nevertheless classified in + +Dicharax + +. We follow a recommendation of B. Páll-Gergely (pers. comm.) and classify the new species also preliminarily in + +Dicharax + +. + + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Dicharax + +(?) + +candrakirana + + +n. sp. + +Indonesia: Malang, Sempu Island, at entrance of Kelabang Cave (holotype MZB 19025). Scale bar = 1 mm. + + + + +FIGURE 2. +Type locality of + +Dicharax + +(?) + +candrakirana + + +n. sp. + +: limestone rocks at entrance of Kelabang Cave on Sempu Island, Indonesia. + + + + + +Dicharax + +(?) + +candrakirana + + +n. sp. + +differs from + +Dicharax longituba +( +Martens, 1864 +) + +of +Java +and +Sumatra +in the smaller shell with a shorter sutural tube, an only indistinct constriction without swelling, the lack of ribbing and the presence of spiral striae at the bottom side around the umbilicus. It differs from + +Chamalycaeus fruhstorferi +( +Möllendorff, 1897 +) + +of +Java +and + +Chamalycaeus kessneri +Vermeulen, 1996 + +of +Bali +and Nusa Penida in the smaller shell with fewer whorls and the lack of ribbing and elevated spiral striations. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +: +Indonesia +, +East Java +: +Malang +, +Sempu Island +, limestone rocks in lowland rainforest at entrance of +Kelabang Cave +, + +44 m +a.s.l. + +, +8°26'58"S +112°41'28"E +( +MZB +19025, leg. +A.S. Nurinsiyah +& H. +Fauzia + +9 June 2014 + +; measurements: D = +2.2 mm +, H = +1.3 mm +) + +. + +Paratypes +: +Indonesia +, +East Java +: +Malang +, +Sempu Island +, limestone rocks at entrance of +Kelabang Cave +, + +44 m +a.s.l. + +, +8°26'58"S +112°41'28"E +( +MZB +19026/1; +ZMH 133203 +/2); Malang, +Sempu Island +, summit of Kembar Satu Hill, + +65 m +a.s.l. + +, +8°27'20"S +112°41'28"E +( +MZB +19027/2; +ZMH 133204 +/1); +Malang +, +Sempu Island +, +Jembatan Anakan Hill +, + +46 m +a.s.l. + +, +8°27'05"S +112°41'28"E +( +MZB +19028/1). + + + + + +Type +locality ( +Fig. 2 +). + +Indonesia +, +East Java +: +Malang +, +Sempu Island +, limestone rocks in lowland rainforest at entrance of +Kelabang Cave +, + +44 m +a.s.l. + +, +8°26'58"S +112°41'28"E +. + + + + + +Distribution. +The new species is known only from limestone rocks in lowland rainforest on Sempu Island in +Indonesia +. + + + + +Etymology. +The species is named after Candra Kirana, a beautiful princess in the famous Indonesian folk tale ‘Keong Mas’, the ‘Golden Snail’. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3C/00/373C00872DBAE078090B7AA20DFB4077.xml b/data/37/3C/00/373C00872DBAE078090B7AA20DFB4077.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..49831a6ab1a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3C/00/373C00872DBAE078090B7AA20DFB4077.xml @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ + + + +La reserve naturelle integrale du Mt Nimba. XI. Hymenopteres Formicidae. + + + +Author + +Bernard, F. + +text + + +Memoires de l'Institut Francais d'Afrique Noire + + +1953 + +19 + + +165 +270 + + + + +http://research.amnh.org/entomology/social_insects/ants/publications/6391/6391.pdf + +journal article +6391 + + + + +Race +melancholica Sant. + + + + +De loin la plus abondante a tous niveaux, Sa tete, plus large et echancree que dans les autres races, la fait ressembler, a +picata +, mais cette derniere a un thorax beaucoup plus grele. Savane: Yalanzou, Nion, Ziela, Keoulenta. Foret a diverses altitudes. Encore plus commune sur les cretes, de 1.300 a 1.600, d'ou proviennent le plus grand nombre de soldats et deux [[queen]] ailees immatures. Cette sous-espece est connue de Guinee, Cote d'Ivoire, Cote de l'Or, Nigeria, avec varietes au Congo belge et en Afrique orientale. Les [[queen]] n'etaient pas decrites, et different peu du type +megacephala +strict. Voici leurs principaux caracteres: + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3C/0A/373C0A446581E0FC82397486A7A2CE08.xml b/data/37/3C/0A/373C0A446581E0FC82397486A7A2CE08.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dbe19768d31 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3C/0A/373C0A446581E0FC82397486A7A2CE08.xml @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ + + + +Cyanobacteria of Greece: an annotated checklist + + + +Author + +Gkelis, Spyros + + + +Author + +Ourailidis, Iordanis + + + +Author + +Panou, Manthos + + + +Author + +Pappas, Nikos + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +10084 +10084 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10084 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10084 +1314-2828--10084 + + + + +Oscillatoria curviceps C. Agardh ex Gomont, 1892 + + + + +Oscillatoria curviceps + + + +Notes + +Anagnostidis 1968 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3C/68/373C6836FFF2FF88FD3CFB8CFB7DFB5D.xml b/data/37/3C/68/373C6836FFF2FF88FD3CFB8CFB7DFB5D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cc5259d6014 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3C/68/373C6836FFF2FF88FD3CFB8CFB7DFB5D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,247 @@ + + + +Hoplopygothrix Schürhoff (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae: Gymnetini) Revisited: A New Species and Country Record for Bolivia + + + +Author + +Ratcliffe, Brett C. +Systematics Research Collections, W 436 Nebraska Hall University of Nebraska State Museum Lincoln, NE 68588 - 0514, U. S. A +bratcliffe1@unl.edu + +text + + +The Coleopterists Bulletin + + +2011 + +2011-03-01 + + +65 + + +1 + + +63 +66 + + + +journal article +10.1649/0010-065X-65.1.63 +1938-4394 +4893067 + + + + + + +Hoplopygothrix boliviensis +Ratcliffe + +, +new species + +( +Figs. 1–5 +, +9 +) + + + + +Type Material. + +Holotype +male labeled “ +Bolivia +: +Santa Cruz +, +5km +S. Pampa Grande +, Oleoducto Road, 18-20/XI/03, Morris, Nearns, Wappes” and with my red +holotype +label + +. + +Holotype +deposited at the +University of Nebraska State Museum +( +Lincoln, NE +) + +. + + + +Holotype +. + +Male. Length +13.4 mm +; width +7.7 mm +. +Head +: Color black, velutinous, with 2 parallel, cream-colored vittae extending from occiput mesad of each eye to clypeus where vittae coalesce to cover most of clypeus. Surface sparsely punctate on vittae, densely punctate between vittae; punctures black, moderately large, setigerous; setae short to mostly long, black to dark brown, less dense on clypeus; eye canthus with several long, stout, black setae. Clypeus at apex strongly reflexed, lacking marginal bead, emarginate at center with broadly rounded anterior angles. Interocular width equals 5.0 transverse eye diameters. Antenna 10-segmented, club subequal in length to segments 2-7. +Pronotum +: Color black, velutinous, with 2 short, parallel, cream-colored vittae at apex and with irregular, cream-colored band on lateral margins. Surface punctate on apical half and sides, sparsely punctate on basal half of disc; punctures small to moderate in size on disc, becoming larger on lateral margins and anterior half; punctures round to crescent-shaped, often confluent near anterior angles, setigerous; setae moderately dense, becoming denser in anterior half, long, dark brown. Lateral margin with distinct bead. Epimeron with color and surface similar to that of lateral margin of pronotum. Scutellum at apex with small tuft of dark brown setae. +Elytra +: Color mostly black, suffused with dark reddish brown, velutinous, with cream-colored, transverse spots just behind humerus, middle next to suture, lateral margin behind middle, and on apical umbone ( +Fig. 1 +). Surface on disc with indistinct rows of punctures; punctures small to moderate, mostly crescent-shaped, only some punctures setigerous; setae minute to short, dark reddish brown. Apex with dense, moderately large, crescent-shaped punctures. Apical umbone prominent. Apices at suture subquadrately obtuse. Lateral margin with prominent bead. +Pygidium +: Color black, shiny, with cream-colored spot in angles (moderately large) and at center base and apex (both small). Surface concentrically rugulose, setigerous; setae moderate in density, short, dark brown. In lateral view, surface weakly convex. +Venter +: Color black ( +Fig. 2 +), shiny, abdominal ster- nites 1-5 with small, cream-colored patch on posterolateral edge; last sternite with transverse, cream-colored band at apex; metacoxa creamcolored on lateral edge. Thoracic sternites with dense, long, dark reddish brown to black setae. Mesometasternal process nearly flat, short (not reaching procoxae), apex shiny and narrowly rounded. Abdominal sternites each with several large punctures on lateral thirds. Sternites 1-4 with distinct, longitudinal sulcus. Last sternite setigerously punctate on lateral corners, setae black, moderate in length. +Legs +: Femur and tibia black, shiny, overlain with extensive areas of cream color interspersed with large, black punctures. Protibia with 1 lateral tooth at apex. Metatibia with 2 articulated, apical spurs with acute apices. +Parameres +: Form not noticeably constricted in caudal view and apex entire ( +Figs. 3–5 +). + + + + +Figs. 1–2. + +Hoplopygothrix boliviensis + +. +1) +Dorsal habitus; +2) +Ventral habitus. + + + + +Distribution +( +Fig. 9 +). +1 specimen +examined. + +BOLIVIA +: + +Santa Cruz +(1): Pampa Grande ( +5 km +S). + + +Temporal Distribution. +November (1). + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Hoplopygothrix boliviensis + +differs from + +H. atropurpurea + +by the strongly reflexed clypeus (present in + +H. boliviensis + +, absent in + +H. atropurpurea + +), bead on the apical margin of + +THE COLEOPTERISTS BULLETIN 65(1), 2011 65 + + +Figs. 3–8. +Parameres of + +Hoplopygothrix boliviensis + +( +3–5 +) and + +Hoplopygothrix atropurpurea + +( +6–8 +). +3, 6) +Lateral view; +4, 7) +Dorsal view; +5, 8) +Ventral view. + + + +the clypeus (absent in + +H. boliviensis + +, present in + +H. atropurpurea + +), absence of a distinctly tawny tuft of setae at the apex of the scutellum (present in + +H. atropurpurea + +), convex pygidium (flat in + +H. atropurpurea + +), presence of cream-colored vittae or spots on the dorsum and venter (venter only in + +H. atropurpurea + +), and form of the male genitalia ( +Figs. 3–8 +). The genitalia of + +H. boliviensis + +have a proportionally longer basal piece, the parameres are not noticeably constricted laterally as in + +H. atropurpurea + +, and the apex lacks the distinctive spine seen in + +H. atropurpurea + +. The female of + +H. boliviensis + +remains unknown. + + + + +Biology. +A single specimen is insufficient to determine the extent of the geographic or temporal distributions. As with many captures of singletons, nothing is known of the biology of this species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3C/68/373C6836FFF2FF8AFF03FAF0FC32FC30.xml b/data/37/3C/68/373C6836FFF2FF8AFF03FAF0FC32FC30.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b215a1db05a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3C/68/373C6836FFF2FF8AFF03FAF0FC32FC30.xml @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + +Hoplopygothrix Schürhoff (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae: Gymnetini) Revisited: A New Species and Country Record for Bolivia + + + +Author + +Ratcliffe, Brett C. +Systematics Research Collections, W 436 Nebraska Hall University of Nebraska State Museum Lincoln, NE 68588 - 0514, U. S. A +bratcliffe1@unl.edu + +text + + +The Coleopterists Bulletin + + +2011 + +2011-03-01 + + +65 + + +1 + + +63 +66 + + + +journal article +10.1649/0010-065X-65.1.63 +1938-4394 +4893067 + + + + + + + +Hoplopygothrix +Schürhoff, 1933 + + + + + + + + +Type +Species. + + +Gymnetis atropurpurea +Schaum, 1841: 48 + +, by monotypy. + + + + +Diagnosis. +The following combination of characters distinguishes + +Hoplopygothrix + +: head, pronotum, elytra, and pygidium with dense, short to moderately long setae; color of dorsum velutinous black to dark reddish brown, with or without creamcolored vittae or spots. Males have longitudinally sulcate abdominal sternites. + + + +Hoplopygothrix + +is similar to + +Neocorvicoana +Ratcliffe and Mico + +because they are both setose dorsally, a character not found in other genera of New World Gymnetini. Species of + +Hoplopygothrix + +differ from those of + +Neocorvicoana + +in that + +Hoplopygothrix + +males have a longitudinal sulcus in the middle of the abdominal sternites, but the sternites are normally convex in + +Neocorvicoana + +. + +Hoplopygothrix +species + +are setose, easily separating them from similar-looking species of + +Hoplopyga +Thomson + +which are glabrous. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3D/51/373D5180B9704D23378F4B58300419FD.xml b/data/37/3D/51/373D5180B9704D23378F4B58300419FD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c8a51dfb711 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3D/51/373D5180B9704D23378F4B58300419FD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828-4-8013 + + + + +Eurytoma phalaridis Graham, 1974 + + + +Distribution +England + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3D/A4/373DA417FFB9FFD6FF57FB483A270897.xml b/data/37/3D/A4/373DA417FFB9FFD6FF57FB483A270897.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5420ed6dda9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3D/A4/373DA417FFB9FFD6FF57FB483A270897.xml @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ + + + +New species of Psychristus ANDREWES 1930 subgenus Nipponobradycellus HABU 1973 (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Harpalini, Stenolophina) from Nepal + + + +Author + +D. W + + + +Author + +Jaeger, B. + + + +Author + +H, Rolwaling + +text + + +Linzer biologische Beiträge + + +2007 + +2007-07-23 + + +39 + + +1 + + +681 +692 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.5412569 +0253-116X +5412569 + + + + + + + +Psychristus +( +Nipponobradycellus +) +umbraticornis +WRASE & JAEGER + +nov.sp. + + + + + +T +y p e m a t e r i a l: +Holotype +: " +NEPAL +Manaslu Mts. +SE-slope W Gupchi Danda + +25- 2600 m + +28°08’59N +84°46’06 E +19/ + +20.5.2006 + +leg. +J. Schmidt +" ( +Coll. J. Schmidt +, Admannshagen, Germ.). + + + + + +D i a g n o s i s:Anapterousspeciesofsmallsizein + +Nipponobradycellus + +, dark reddish brown with antennae partly darkened, antennae relatively short for a stenolophine, with pronotum almost rectilinearly narrowed toward the short, weakly obtusely angled but sharp posterior angles, and with elytral striae distinctly punctured (habitus see +Fig. 5 +, for values of measurements and ratios see also +Tabl. 1 +). + + +D e s c r i p t i o n: Body length +3.9 mm +; width +1.6 mm +, respectively. + +Colour: Head, pronotum and elytra dark reddish brown, sutural interval a little lighter. Antennomeres 3-6 distinctly darkened, legs reddish brown, palpi yellowish. + +Head: Large for a species in + +Nipponobradycellus + +, somewhat narrower than pronotum (0.81 times as wide as pronotum), with eyes only moderately prominent. Tempora oblique, of about one fifth of eye diameter. Antennae pubescent from of antennomere 4. + + +Pronotum ( +Fig. 5 +): Transverse, cordate (1.20 times as wide as long, 1.23 times as wide as head), widest at about anterior third, lateral seta inserted a little before this. Disc only sligthly convex, median line moderately deeply impressed, becoming shallowly and not reaching anterior margin, toward base somewhat deepened and reaching posterior margin; anterior transverse impression indistinct, posterior transverse impression almost indistinct. Anterior margin rectilinear with anterior angles hardly projecting forward. Sides slightly curved apicad, from widest point weakly convex and almost rectilinearly narrowed toward the short, weakly obtuse-angled posterior angles, sharp at tip, denticle small but distinct. Base a little narrower than anterior margin, evenly and weakly concave (maximum width 1.42 times as wide as base). Lateral furrows narrow, anterior margin only laterally bordered, lateral border at basal margin reaching almost basal foveae. Basal foveae somewhat elongately impressed and somewhat curved laterad, not reaching the basal margin. Base except middle coarsely and moderately sparsely punctured, puncturation continuing along lateral margin to anterior angles, some irregularly scattered fine punctures behind anterior margin. + + +Elytra ( +Fig. 5 +): Short-oval (1.48 times as wide as long, 1.55 times as wide as pronotum), on disc moderately convex, with humeri weakly developed, widely rounded, without humeral tooth; toward behind distinctly enlarged, widest at about middle. Basal bead weakly sinuate, arcuately curving inside humerus and without angle turning to lateral margin. Scutellar pore puncture present, scutellar stria short at left, and reduced at right side. Third interval with a setigerous pore puncture at stria 2 shortly before middle. Striae weakly impressed, distinctly punctured, intervals flat. Subapical sinuation weak. Last sternite with 2 setae on each side. + +Hind wings: Strongly reduced to small scales. + +Sterna: Prosternum impunctate, pro- and mesepisternum sparsely, coarsely and somewhat irregularly punctured. Metepisternum ( +Fig. 8 +) impunctate, short, ventral margin about as long as anterior margin, strongly narrowed posteriad. + +Legs: Male protarsi weakly and mesotarsi very weakly dilated, both with adhesive vestiture ventrally, consisting of not numerous biseriate, elongate hyaline setae difficult to see (in protarsi apically distinctly, in metatarsi weakly widened). +Microsculpture of surface: Strongly reduced (except strong isodiametric meshes on labrum and scutellum), on head and pronotum practically invisible, on elytra microsculpture mesh pattern consisting of strong-transverse meshes weakly impressed, surface of forebody strongly shiny, elytra very faintly iridescent. + +Median lobe of aedeagus ( +Figs 6, 7 +): Arcuate, with apex flattened and somewhat reflexed (lateral view), apicad moderately narrowed into middle-long apical lamella, twisted somewhat to the left (dorsal view). Internal sac without any larger teeth but with a specific folding pattern. + +Female genitalia: Unknown. + +C o m p a r i s o n s: See under + +P. schmidti + +nov.sp. +and key. Differing also from the other species described here in having elytra laterally more convex. + +E t y m o l o g y: The new species is named for the partly darkened antennae (Latin "umbra": shadow, and "cornu": horn = antenna). + +D i s t r i b u t i o n: Currently only known from the +type +locality in the southeastern slopes of the Manaslu Himal in Central-Nepal. + +H a b i t a t: Collected by sifting leaf-litter in a mixed broadleaf forest of the lower cloud forest zone. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3D/A4/373DA417FFBBFFD7FF57FE443AE70D45.xml b/data/37/3D/A4/373DA417FFBBFFD7FF57FE443AE70D45.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fefa793d9f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3D/A4/373DA417FFBBFFD7FF57FE443AE70D45.xml @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ + + + +New species of Psychristus ANDREWES 1930 subgenus Nipponobradycellus HABU 1973 (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Harpalini, Stenolophina) from Nepal + + + +Author + +D. W + + + +Author + +Jaeger, B. + + + +Author + +H, Rolwaling + +text + + +Linzer biologische Beiträge + + +2007 + +2007-07-23 + + +39 + + +1 + + +681 +692 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.5412569 +0253-116X +5412569 + + + + + + + +Psychristus +( +Nipponobradycellus +) +glaber +JAEGER & WRASE + +nov.sp. + + + + + +T +y p e m a t e r i a l: +Holotype +: " +NEPAL +Annapurna Mts. +below +Thulo Bugin +, above +Talbagar + +3500-3800 m + +30/31.5.04 leg. +Schmidt +" ( +Coll. D.W. Wrase +, +Berlin +, +Germ. +). + + + + + +D i a g n o s i s An apterous species of small body size in + +Nipponobradycellus + +, dark reddish brown to piceous, with appendages, first interval of elytra, apical half of head somewhat paler, with antennae relatively short for a stenolophine, and with pronotum cordiforme, strongly convex to anterior angles, roundly narrowed toward the base, with a weak sinuation before the well marked denticulate posterior angles, and with elytra with first stria weakly impressed and punctured, second stria partly reduced, remaining ones indicated only by single punctures and the remaining striae completely reduced, only marked by shallow punctures (habitus see +Fig. 9 +, for values of measurements and ratios see also +Tabl. 1 +). + + +D e s c r i p t i o n: Body length +3.6 mm +; width +1.5 mm +, respectively. + +Colour: Head, pronotum and elytra dark brown to piceous, with margins and sutural interval of elytra and apical half of head lighter. Appendages light brown to testaceous. + +Head: Head of average size in + +Nipponobradycellus + +(0.79 times as wide as pronotum), with eyes moderately prominent. Tempora oblique, of about one sixth of eye diameter. Antennae pubescent from antennomere 4. + + +Pronotum ( +Fig. 9 +): Transverse, cordiform (1.20 times as wide as long, 1.26 times as wide as head), widest at beginning of second third, lateral seta inserted somewhat behind this. Disc convex, median line smooth, weakly impressed medially, becoming shallow to anterior and posterior margin and not reaching them, anterior and posterior transverse impressions only suggested. Anterior margin slightly convex, anterior angles not projecting forward, narrowly rounded at tip. Sides strongly curved apicad, from widest point weakly convex, distinctly sinuate to the weakly obtuse-angled posterior angles, sharp at tip, denticle very small but distinct, protruding laterally. Base about as wide as anterior margin (maximum width about 1.33 times as wide as base), medially weakly and laterally strongly convex with hind angles strongly produced. Lateral furrows narrow, becoming finer toward anterior angles, anterior margin only laterally bordered, at basal margin border reaching the basal foveae. Basal foveae small and indistinct, somewhat elongately impressed, base with only a few shallow punctures in and around foveae. + + +Elytra ( +Fig. 9 +): Short-oval (1.45 times as long as wide, 1.47 times as wide as pronotum), on disc slightly convex, with humeri well developed, rounded and somewhat projected forward, without humeral tooth; toward behind somewhat enlarged, widest at about middle. Basal bead arcuately curving inside humerus, with a sharp angle turning to lateral margin. Scutellar pore puncture present, scutellar stria completely reduced. Interval 3 without a setigerous pore puncture on disc. Stria 1 weakly impressed and punctured, stria 2 partly, remaining striae completely reduced, only marked by fine and shallow punctures. Subapical sinuation weak. Last sternite with 1 seta on each side (male). + +Hind wings: Strongly reduced to small scales. + +Sterna: Prosternum (except some single shallow punctures anteriorly), pro-, mes- and metepisternum impunctate. Metepisternum ( +Fig. 12 +) short, ventral margin only about 1.2 times longer as anterior margin, strongly narrowed posteriad. + +Legs: Male protarsi weakly and mesotarsi very weakly dilated, both with adhesive vestiture ventrally, consisting of not numerous biseriate, elongate hyaline setae difficult to see (in protarsi apically distinctly, in metatarsi weakly widened). +Microsculpture of surface: Strongly reduced, except for distinct isodiametric meshes on labrum and scutellum, surface strongly shiny. + +Median lobe of aedeagus ( +Figs 10, 11 +): Relatively short, moderately arcuate, with apex flattened (lateral view), apicad moderately narrowed and twisted somewhat to the left, apical lamella short, triangular (dorsal view). Internal sac without any larger teeth but with a specific folding pattern, medially covered by large and flat honeycomb-like plates of somewhat irregular shape. + +Female genitalia: Unknown. + +C o m p a r i s o n s: Easily distinguished from + +P. schmidti + +nov.sp. +and + +P. umbraticornis + +nov.sp. +by elytra with only stria 1 impressed, 2 partly and remaining completely reduced and without discal pore puncture in interval 3, and by a completely different construction of the median lobe, additionally by extreme small body size (to date the smallest species known in + +Psychristus + +). + +E t y m o l o g y: The new species is named for the reduced striation of elytra (Latin "glaber": smooth). + +D i s t r i b u t i o n: Currently only known from the +type +locality in the western macroslope of the Annapurna Mountains into the Kaligandaki Valley in Central-Nepal. + + +H a b i t a t: Taken by sifting leaf-litter in a +Rhododendron arboreum +forest in the upper cloud forest zone. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3D/A4/373DA417FFBEFFD4FF57FED43A6B0D93.xml b/data/37/3D/A4/373DA417FFBEFFD4FF57FED43A6B0D93.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cd679025e8b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3D/A4/373DA417FFBEFFD4FF57FED43A6B0D93.xml @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ + + + +New species of Psychristus ANDREWES 1930 subgenus Nipponobradycellus HABU 1973 (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Harpalini, Stenolophina) from Nepal + + + +Author + +D. W + + + +Author + +Jaeger, B. + + + +Author + +H, Rolwaling + +text + + +Linzer biologische Beiträge + + +2007 + +2007-07-23 + + +39 + + +1 + + +681 +692 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.5412569 +0253-116X +5412569 + + + + + + + +Psychristus +( +Nipponobradycellus +) +schmidti +WRASE & JAEGER + +nov.sp. + + + + + +T +y p e m a t e r i a l: +Holotype +: " +NEPAL +Rolwaling Himal +, above +Simigau village +, + +2700- 2800 m + + +1.6.2000 + +leg. +J. Schmidt +" ( +Coll. J. Schmidt +, +Admannshagen +, +Germ. +). + + + + + +D i a g n o s i s An apterous species of average size in + +Nipponobradycellus + +, dark reddish brown with appendages partly darkened, antennae relatively short for a stenolophine, with pronotum strongly sinuate toward weak-obtuse but sharp posterior angles, and with elytral striae distinctly punctured (habitus see +Fig. 1 +, for values of measurements and ratios see also +Tabl. 1 +). + + +D e s c r i p t i o n: Body length +4.6 mm +; width +1.9 mm +, respectively. + +Colour: Head and pronotum dark reddish brown, elytra somewhat darker, piceous with sutural interval a little lighter. Femora and antennomeres 3-6 distinctly darkened, antennomere 2 and the remaining last with a blackish stripe at middle, also tibiae and tarsi slightly to moderately infuscate, palpi yellowish. + +Head: Of average size in + +Nipponobradycellus + +, narrower than pronotum (0.79 times as wide as pronotum), with eyes moderately prominent. Tempora oblique, of about one sixth of eye diameter. Antennae pubescent from antennomere 4. + + +Pronotum ( +Fig. 1 +): Transverse, cordate (1.23 times as wide as long, 1.27 times as wide as head), widest at about anterior third, lateral seta inserted a little before this. Disc only sligthly convex, median line moderately deeply impressed, becoming shallow almost reaching anterior margin, toward base somewhat deepened and reaching posterior margin; anterior transverse impression almost indistinct, posterior transverse impression indistinct. Anterior margin only weakly emarginate, anterior angles weakly projecting forward, narrowly rounded at tip. Sides slightly curved apicad, from widest point weakly convex and strongly sinuate toward the weakly obtuse-angled posterior angles, sharp at tip, denticle not present. Base somewhat narrower than anterior margin, evenly concave (maximum width 1.53 times as wide as base). Lateral furrows narrow, somewhat before posterior angles vanishing, anterior margin only laterally bordered. Basal foveae somewhat elongately impressed, reaching the basal margin. Base coarsely and moderately sparsely (in and around basal foveae somewhat denser) punctured, puncturation continuing along lateral margin to anterior angles, some irregularly and scattered fine to coarse punctures behind anterior margin. + + +Elytra ( +Fig. 1 +): Short-oval, (1.51 times as long as wide, 1.50 times as wide as pronotum), on disc moderately convex, with humeri weakly developed, broadly rounded, without humeral tooth; toward behind somewhat enlarged, widest at about middle. Basal bead weakly sinuate, arcuately curving inside humerus and with a weak angle turning to lateral margin. Scutellar pore puncture present, scutellar stria normal long. Third interval shortly before middle with a setigerous pore puncture at stria 2. Stria weak, distinctly punctured, intervals flat. Subapical sinuation weak. Last sternite with 2 setae on each side. + +Hind wings: Strongly reduced to small scales. + +Sterna: Prosternum impunctate, pro- and mesepisternum sparsely and coarsely punctured. Metepisternum ( +Fig. 4 +) impunctate, short, ventral margin about 1.3 times as long as anterior margin, moderately narrowed posteriad. + +Legs: Male protarsi weakly, mesotarsi very weakly dilated, both with adhesive vestiture ventrally, consisting of not numerous biseriate, elongate hyaline setae difficult to see (in protarsi apically distinctly, in metatarsi weakly widened). +Microsculpture of surface: Strongly reduced (except strong isodiametric meshes on labrum and scutellum), on head and pronotum practically invisible, on elytra microsculpture mesh pattern consisting of strong-transverse meshes weakly impressed, surface of forebody strongly shiny, elytra very faintly iridescent. + +Median lobe of aedeagus ( +Figs 2, 3 +): Arcuate, with apex flattened and somewhat reflexed (lateral view), middle part almost parallel, apicad apruptly narrowed into a long, parallel apical lamella (dorsal view). Internal sac without any larger teeth, but with specific folding pattern. + +Female genitalia: Unknown. + +C o m p a r i s o n s: Though similar to the second new species + +P. umbraticornis + +nov.sp. +from +Nepal +with completely developed elytral striae, described below, in being wingless and having middle antennomeres and femora darkened, + +P. schmidti + +nov.sp. +differs in having antennomere 2 and the last ones with a blackish stripe at middle, by a different pronotal shape (from widest point weakly convex and strongly sinuate toward the longer, weakly obtuse-angled posterior angles, sharp at tip, in + +P. umbraticornis + +nov.sp. +almost rectilinearly narrowed toward the short posterior angles), by more strongly developed humeri (with more reduced humeri in + +P. umbraticornis + +nov.sp. +), and by a different construction of the median lobe (with a long, parallel-sided apical lamella, in + +P. umbraticornis + +nov.sp. +apical lamella evenly narrowed). Judging from the single specimens in both species, + +P. schmidti + +nov.sp. +has also a larger body size. See also key. + + +E t y m o l o g y: Dedicated to our dear friend and colleague Joachim Schmidt (Admannshagen at Rostock), excellent specialist in +Carabidae +who collected the +holotype +of this and the other new species from +Nepal +. + + +D i s t r i b u t i o n: Currently only known from the +type +locality in the upper Tama +Koshi +Valley in the Rolwaling Himal in Central-Nepal. + + +H a b i t a t: The specimen was taken by sifting leaf-litter in the middle cloud forest zone, composed of +Abies spectabilis +, +Quercus semicarpifolia +and +Rhododendron arboreum +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3D/A4/373DA417FFBFFFD2FF57FC393F490F1A.xml b/data/37/3D/A4/373DA417FFBFFFD2FF57FC393F490F1A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..859bba95597 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3D/A4/373DA417FFBFFFD2FF57FC393F490F1A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + +New species of Psychristus ANDREWES 1930 subgenus Nipponobradycellus HABU 1973 (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Harpalini, Stenolophina) from Nepal + + + +Author + +D. W + + + +Author + +Jaeger, B. + + + +Author + +H, Rolwaling + +text + + +Linzer biologische Beiträge + + +2007 + +2007-07-23 + + +39 + + +1 + + +681 +692 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.5412569 +0253-116X +5412569 + + + + + + +Key to species of subgenus + +Nipponobradycellus + +from +Nepal + + + + + + + + +1 Elytra smooth with only stria 1 completely developed, stria 2 partly reduced, remaining ones indicated only by single punctures. Interval 3 without discal pore puncture. Last abdominal sternite marginally with only one seta at each side in male......... ..................................................................................... + +P. glaber +JAEGER & WRASE + +nov.sp. + + + +- Elytra with all striae completely developed. Interval 3 with discal pore puncture. Last abdominal sternite marginally with two setae at each side in male.....................................2 + + + + + +2 Pronotum from widest point weakly convex and strongly sinuate toward the longer, weakly obtuse-angled but sharp posterior angles, denticle absent. Antennomere 2 and 7-11 with a blackish stripe at middle. Humeri more strongly developed. Eyes moderately convex. Elytra longer (EL/EW 1,51). Median lobe with a long, narrow, parallel-sided apical lamella ( +Figs 2, 3 +). Body size larger, +4.6 mm +(up to now only +one male +known).............................................................. + +P. schmidti +WRASE & JAEGER + +nov.sp. + + + + +- Pronotum from widest point almost rectilinearly narrowed toward the short, weakly obtuse-angled but sharp posterior angles, a small denticle present. Antennomere 2 and 7-11 of the same colour as antennomere 1. Humeri less strongly developed. Eyes fairly flat. Elytra shorter (EL/EW 1.48). Median lobe with apical lamella evenly narrowed ( +Figs 6, 7 +). Body size smaller, +3.9 mm +(up to now only +one male +known). .......................... ......................................................................... + +P. umbraticornis +WRASE & JAEGER + +nov.sp. + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3E/9F/373E9F7AC01C598D88157E7F087A12F7.xml b/data/37/3E/9F/373E9F7AC01C598D88157E7F087A12F7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cb7e658163a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3E/9F/373E9F7AC01C598D88157E7F087A12F7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ + + + +New Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) records with new collection data from New Brunswick, and an addition to the fauna of Quebec, Canada: Aleocharinae + + + +Author + +Webster, Reginald P. +Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent St., P. O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB, Canada E 3 B 5 P 7 +reginaldwebster@rogers.com + + + +Author + +Klimaszewski, Jan +Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 du P. E. P. S., P. O. Box 10380, Stn. Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Quebec, Canada G 1 V 4 C 7 + + + +Author + +Sweeney, Jon D. +Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent St., P. O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB, Canada E 3 B 5 P 7 + + + +Author + +DeMerchant, Ian +Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent St., P. O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB, Canada E 3 B 5 P 7 + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-04-26 + + +186 + + +83 +118 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.186.2655 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.186.2655 +1313-2970-186-83 +FF806749FFE3D977AF2BFFEAFFD2014B +577172 + + + + +Philhygra luridipennis Mannerheim, 1831** +Map 32 +illustrations Klimaszewski et al. (2011) + + + +Material examined. + +New Brunswick, Carleton Co. +Jackson Falls, +46.2257°N +, +67.7437°W +, 12.IX.2009, R. P. Webster, river margin near waterfall, splashing moss near splash zone of waterfall (1 ♀, RWC). +Madawaska Co. +, +Gagne +Brook at First Lake, +47.6077°N +, +68.2534°W +, 23.VI.2010, M. Turgeon & R. Webster, northern hardwood forest, shaded brook among gravel on gravel bar, splashing, turning gravel (1 ♂, RWC). +Restigouche Co. +, Little Tobique R. near Red Brook, +47.4465°N +, +67.0689°W +, 13.VI.2006, R. P. Webster, alder swamp near river, in debris on muddy soil near brook (1 ♀, RWC); Jacquet River Gorge P.N.A., +47.8257°N +, +66.0768°W +, 16.VI.2009, R. P. Webster, mixed mature forest, cool clear medium sized stream, in gravel & under cobble stones near margin of stream (1 ♂, 1 ♀, RWC); 1.5 km S of Quebec (border), 425 m elev., +47.9058°N +, +68.1505°W +, 22.VI.2010, R. P. Webster, boreal forest, small shaded brook, splashing gravel on gravel bar (1 ♂, RWC); Kedgwick Forks, +47.9085°N +, +67.9057°W +, 22.VI.2010, R. P. Webster, river margin on clay/sand, under alders (1 ♀, RWC). +York Co. +, Charters Settlement, +45.8395°N +, +66.7391°W +, 26.VII.2005, R. P. Webster, mixed forest, M.V. light (1 ♀, RWC); same locality data and collector, 21.IV.2010, mixed forest opening, collected with aerial net during evening flight between 16:30 and 19:00 h (1 ♂, RWC). + + + +Map 32. +Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of + +Philhygra luridipennis + +. + + + + +Collection and habitat data. + +Most adults of + +Philhygra luridipennis + +from New Brunswick were collected from riparian habitats in various deciduous and coniferous forest types. Specimens were collected from gravel (splashing and turning gravel) on gravel bars along shaded brooks in a northern hardwood forest and a boreal forest with balsam fir and white spruce, hand collected from gravel and from under cobblestones on the margin of a clear, medium-sized stream in a mixed forest, sifted from debris on muddy soil near a brook in an alder swamp, hand collected from a sand and clay mix under alders near a river margin, and collected by splashing water on moss near the splash zone of a waterfall. Other specimens were collected at a mercury vapor light and with an aerial net during an evening flight near a mixed forest and nearby stream. Adults were collected during April, June, July, and September. Little was previously known about the habitat associations of this species. The male specimen from Newfoundland was captured in a flight intercept trap in a mixed forest ( +Klimaszewski et al. 2011 +). + + + +Distribution in Canada and Alaska. + +NB, +NF ( +Klimaszewski et al. 2011 +). This species is either Holarctic or an adventive Palaearctic species in North America ( +Klimaszewski et al. 2011 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/2F/373F2F634AB4592812A5D0DB670E5180.xml b/data/37/3F/2F/373F2F634AB4592812A5D0DB670E5180.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d99e815c506 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/2F/373F2F634AB4592812A5D0DB670E5180.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828-4-8013 + + + + +Sectiliclava cleone (Walker, 1844) + + + + +Encyrtus cleone +Walker, 1844 + + +ungularis +(Thomson, 1876, +Litomastix +) + + +adulticollis +(Robinson, 1961, +Parapsyllaephagus +) + + +paliuri +Hoffer, 1957 + + + +Distribution +England + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/36/373F363D1B2054E19E2A13C6FD0F2B11.xml b/data/37/3F/36/373F363D1B2054E19E2A13C6FD0F2B11.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2a53b764b8a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/36/373F363D1B2054E19E2A13C6FD0F2B11.xml @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ + + + +Bee species checklist of the San Francisco Peaks, Arizona + + + +Author + +McCabe, Lindsie M +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, United States of America +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9815-0581 +lma243@nau.edu + + + +Author + +Chesshire, Paige R +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, United States of America + + + +Author + +Smith, David R +U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Forest Science Complex, Flagstaff, United States of America + + + +Author + +Wolf, Atticus +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, United States of America + + + +Author + +Gibbs, Jason +Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4945-5423 + + + +Author + +Griswold, Terry L +USDA-ARS, Pollinating Insects Research Unit, Logan, United States of America + + + +Author + +Wright, Karen W +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M, College Station, United States of America + + + +Author + +Cobb, Neil S +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, United States of America +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6155-9444 + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2020 + +8 + + +49285 +49285 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e49285 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e49285 +1314-2828-8-e49285 +7B7852D5E053597D964773508EBDC88A + + + + +Osmia (Melanosmia) albolateralis Cockerell, 1906 + + + +Notes +Last collected on the Peaks in 1971 + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/5D/373F5D35D3F12C627F13065E75EC9352.xml b/data/37/3F/5D/373F5D35D3F12C627F13065E75EC9352.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2afdbf9b9f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/5D/373F5D35D3F12C627F13065E75EC9352.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Platygastroidea + + + +Author + +Buhl, Peter N. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Notton, David G. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +7991 +7991 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7991 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7991 +1314-2828-4-7991 + + + + +Synopeas jasius (Walker, 1835) + + + + +Platygaster jasius +Walker, 1835 + + + +Distribution +England, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF07FF16FF5FABFAFC0E45F4.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF07FF16FF5FABFAFC0E45F4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..874ff8f60e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF07FF16FF5FABFAFC0E45F4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conus + +sensu lato +3 + + + + +Note. +The third group is represented only by + +Conus mucronatolaevis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, which is outstanding due to its mammillate spire, clearly differing from the other two species-groups. This species is morphologically very close to several species treated as + +Varioconus + +by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009 +, +2013 +) [ + +Varioconus + +is considered a junior synonym of + +Lautoconus + +by + +Puillandre +et al +. (2014a + +, +b +)]. Especially, + +Lautoconus micropunctatus +( +Rolán & Röckel, 2000 +) + +is highly reminiscent of + +C. mucronatolaevis + +in its outline and colour pattern. Nevertheless, the presence of tuberculate early spire whorls excludes a placement in + +Lautoconus + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF07FF17FF5FAC84FB54461C.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF07FF17FF5FAC84FB54461C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..60a2709a689 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF07FF17FF5FAC84FB54461C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,662 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis +(Sacco, 1893) + + + + + +Figs 30 +S, 35H1–H3, +35I1–I3 +, 35J + + + + + +Conus avellana +Lam. + +—Hörnes 1851: 29 (partim), pl. 3, figs 3a–c [non + +Conus avellana +Lamarck, 1810 + +; non fig. 3d, = + +Plagioconus +lapugyensi + +s ( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +)]. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +avellana +Lam. + +— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 40 + +(partim) [non + +Conus avellana +Lamarck, 1810 + +]. + + + +[ + +Conus + +] + +Chelyconus mucronatolaevis + +—Sacco 1893: 66, pl. 6, fig. 26 + + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] + +Chelyconus globoponderosus +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 85 + +(nov. nom. pro + +Conus avellana +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 3, fig. 3). + + + + + + +Conus argillicolla +Eichw. + +—Friedberg 1911: 53, pl. 2, fig. 16 [non + +Conus + +s.l. + +argillicola +Eichwald, 1830 + +]. + + + +Conus +cf. +Sturi + +R. Hoern. i. Auinger—Friedberg 1911: 53, pl. 2, fig. 15 [non + +Conus + +s.l. + +sturi +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +vindobonensis + +(Partsch in +Hoernes und Auinger 1879 +)—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 213 + +, pl. 50, figs 4–5 [non + +Conus + +s.l + +vindobonensis +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +] + + + + +Conus mucronatolaevis +Sacco—Hall 1966: 149 + +, pl. 26, figs 9–11, 14, 20 [cum syn.]. + + + +Conus avellana +Lamarck—Davoli 1972 + +: plate captions, pl. 22, figs 39a–b (specimen from the Vienna Basin!) + + + + + + +Conus mucronatolaevis +Sacco 1893 + +— + +Krach 1981 +: 76 + +, pl. 21, figs 3–4, 11–13, 21. + + + + + + + +Chelyconus mucronatolaevis +Sacco—Ferrero + + +Mortara +et al +. 1984 + +: 116 + + +, pl. 18, figs 8a–8b. + + + + + +Varioconus mucronatolaevis +(Sacco, 1893) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 85 + +, figs 121–124. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +avellana +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +— +Atanacković 1985 +: 176, pl. 39, fig. 9. non 1999 + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +mucronatolaevis +(Sacco) + +—Muñiz-Solis: 53, figs 2/L, 7/M–N. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype +illustrated in + +Sacco +(1893b, pl. 6, fig. 26) + +and +Ferrero-Mortara +et al +. (1984, pl. 18, fig. 8), stored in the +Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali +, +Torino +(BS. 038.05.043); +Baldissero +( +Italy +), +Burdigalian +(early +Miocene +). + + + + +Studied material. +4 spec. + +NHMW +1847 + +/0037/0027, +Mikulov-Muschelberg +( +Czech Republic +), including specimen illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 3, figs 3a–c) (= +syntype +of + +Conus globoponderosus +Sacco, 1893 + +); 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1853 + +/0003/0006, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0064, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +) + +. + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 35 +H1–H3: Mikulov-Muschelberg: SL: +59.2 mm +, MD: +32.3 mm +, + +NHMW +1847 + +/0037/ 0 0 27, illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 3, figs 3a–c); + +Figs + +35 + + +I1–I3: +Mikulov-Muschelberg +( +Czech Republic +), SL: +45.4 mm +, MD: +23.8 mm +, + +NHMW +1847 + +/0037/0027; + +Figs +30 + +S, 35J: +Gainfarn +( +Austria +), SL: +42.6 mm +, MD: +23.3 mm +, private collection +Anton Breitenberger +( +Bad Vöslau +, +Austria +) + +. + + +Revised description. +Moderately large, solid shells; early spire mammillate, coeloconoid with prominent beads along lower suture; later spire globose, cyrtoconoid with nearly flat and striate spire whorls; impressed but not channelled suture. Subsutural flexure shallow, weakly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl conical, contracting quickly below broadly rounded shoulder; not constricted. Siphonal fasciole nearly absent; weak spiral cords on base. Aperture narrow, slightly flaring towards short siphonal canal. Colour pattern under regular and UV light consisting of densely spaced delicate spirals of tiny dots. In slightly eroded specimens, these dots form tiny beads. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 5: largest specimen: SL: +66.6 mm +, MD: +32.3 mm +, mean SL: +50.9 mm +(σ = 11.3), mean MD: 26.8 (σ = 5.0), spire angle: µ = 98.8° (σ = 8.0°), last whorl angle: µ = 36° (σ = 1.4°), LW: µ = 1.89 (σ = 0.1), RD: µ = 0.64 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.85 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.18 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +Hall (1966) +revised + +Conus mucronatolaevis + +and synonymized all varieties named by +Sacco (1893b) +. Typical specimens of + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis + +are rather slender and have a more or less conical spire. Broader specimens with cyrtoconoid spires were described by +Sacco (1893b) +as + +Conus m. globospira + +and +C. m. glandispira +. The Paratethyan specimens are closer to these morphotypes. In addition, to the numerous variety names for + +C. mucronatolaevis +, +Sacco (1893b) + +introduced + +globoponderosus + +as new name for the specimens referred to as + +Conus avellana + +by Hörnes (1851). The two specimens illustrated by Hörnes (1851) are almost certainly not conspecific and his fig 3d is most probably a poorly preserved + +Plagioconus +lapugyensis + +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +). Therefore, + +Conus globoponderosus +Sacco, 1893 + +should be restricted to the specimen illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 3) as figs 3a–c. Within the broad species concept of +Hall (1966) +, + +Conus globoponderosus +Sacco, 1893 + +is a subjective junior synonym of + +C. mucronatolaevis + +; within a narrower frame, it would still be a subjective junior synonym of + +Conus globospira +Sacco, 1893 + +. Curiously, +Hall (1966) +included the specimen illustrated as figs 3a–c in Hörnes (1851, pl. 3) in the synonymy of + +Conus belus +d’Orbigny, 1852 + +. In our opinion, this decision is unjustified as + +Lautoconus belus + +, as redefined by +Hall (1966) +, differs in its smaller size, shorter last whorl, the slightly constricted base and the conspicuous spiral sculpture on the last whorl (see also +Muñiz-Solís 1999 +). The specimen described by Friedberg (1911, pl. 2, fig. 16) as + +Conus argillicola +Eichwald + +is stored in the Geological Survey of +Austria +(GBA +1911/2/2 +) and represents a subadult + +C. mucronatolaevis + +. + + +Mayer (1864: 77) +introduced + +Conus borsoni +Mayer, 1864 + +for a species from the Pliocene or Pleistocene of the +Azores +without illustration. In the discussion he referred to specimens from the Burdigalian of +France +( +Grateloup, 1846: pl. 44, fig. 5 +) and the Badenian of +Austria +(Hörnes, 1851, pl. 3, fig. 3), both previously described as + +Conus avellana + +. As discussed above, the illustrations in Hörnes (1851, pl. 3, figs 3a–d) represent two different species. Moreover, it is doubtful if the much younger specimens from the +Azores +are conspecific with any of the Miocene species at all. It is beyond the scope of this paper to revise the fossil +Conidae +of the +Azores +but to solve the confusion we designate the well preserved +syntype +from the tuff deposits of Ilhéu de Baixo, stored in the geological-paleontological collections of the ETH +Zurich +( +Switzerland +), as +lectotype +of + +Conus borsoni + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Shallow marine environments, partly with seagrass (e.g. + +Zuschin +et al. +2007 + +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Steinebrunn ( +Austria +), Mikulov-Muschelberg ( +Czech Republic +) (Hörnes 1851); +Pannonian Basin: +Letkés ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Carpathian Foredeep +: Czepiele, +Ternopil +( +Ukraine +) (Friedberg 1911); Węglinek, Łychów ( +Poland +) ( +Krach 1981 +). + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +northeastern Atlantic. + +Burdigalian (early Miocene): +Turin Hills +: Baldissero ( +Italy +) ( +Sacco 1893b +), middle Miocene: + +Aquitaine +Basin + +, Salies-de-Béarn ( +France +) ( +Peyrot 1931 +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF09FF16FF5FAE6FFC334252.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF09FF16FF5FAE6FFC334252.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..62b25cc9cfe --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF09FF16FF5FAE6FFC334252.xml @@ -0,0 +1,826 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conus + +s.l. + +vindobonensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + + + + + +Figs 30 +R, 35C1–C2, 35D1–D3, 35E1–E3, 35F, 35G1–G2 + + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] + +vindobonensis + +P.[artsch]— + +Hörnes 1848 +: 16 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + + +Conus clavatus +Lam. + +—Hörnes 1851: 25, pl. 2, figs 4a–c [non + +Conus clavatus +Lamarck, 1810 + +]. + + + +Conus ventricosus +Bronn—Hörnes 1851: 32 + +(partim), pl. 3, figs 5a–c, 7a–c [non + +Lautoconus ventricosus +( +Gmelin, 1791 +) + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Vindobonensis +Partsch—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 48 + + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus ventricosus +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 3, figs 5, 7]. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +mediterraneus +Hwass—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 51 + + +, pl. 6, figs 9–11. + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] +C +.[ +helyconus +] + +mediterraneus +var. +pupoidemiocenica +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 104 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus mediterraneus +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, pl. 6, fig. 10]. + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +mediterraneus + +] + +var. +mioexclavata +Sacc. + +—Sacco 1893: 104 [nov. nom. pro + +Conus clavatus +Hörnes, 1851 + +, pl. 2, fig. 4]. + + + +[ + +Conus + +] +C +.[ +helyconus +] + +mediterraneus +var. +permiocenica +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 104 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus mediterraneus +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, pl. 6, fig. 11]. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +vindobonensis +Partsch—Strausz 1966: 458 + +, pl. 69, figs 3–4. + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +vindobonensis +Partsch in +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 + +— +Hinculov 1968 +: 149, pl. 37, fig. 16. + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +vindobonensis +Partsch in +Hörnes, 1848 +( +1856 +) + +— +Nicorici & Sagatovici 1973 +: 176, pl. 27, figs 2–3. + +Conus mediterraneus +Hwass—Krach 1981: 77 + +, pl. 20, figs 13–16, pl. 21, figs 1–2, 5. + + + +? + +Conus vindobonensis vindobonensis +(Partsch) + +— + +Ionesi & Nicorici 1994 +: 62 + +, pl. 5, figs 11–12. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +pyrula +Brocchi, 1814 + +— + +Bałuk 1997 +: 63 + +, pl. 21, figs 5–6 [non + +Lautoconus pyrula +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +vindobonensis +Partsch in +Hörnes, 1856 + +— + +Bałuk 1997 +: 65 + +, pl. 23, figs 1–6. + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +vindobonensis +Partsch in Hörnes—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 2, figs 5a–b. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +vindobonensis + +(Partsch in +Hoernes und Auinger 1879 +)—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 213 + +, pl. 50, figs 4–5 [= + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis +Sacco, 1893 + +]. + + + + +non + +Chelyconus vindobonensis +(Partsch in +Hörnes, 1856 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 62 + +, figs 28–29. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntypes +: 3 spec. + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0043, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +), including specimen illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 3, fig. 5); 5 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0049, +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +), including specimen illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 3, fig. 7). + + + + +Studied material. +3 spec. + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0043, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +), including specimen illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 3, fig. 5); 5 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0049, +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +), including specimen illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 3, fig. 7); 10 spec + +. NHMW 1855/0045/0359, 9 spec. NHMW 1853/0003/0005, 9 spec. + + +NHMW +1856 + +/0050/0115, all +Gainfarn +( +Austria +); 4 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0052, +Gainfarn +and +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +); 7 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/00027/0028, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +); 16 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1860 + +/0001/0067, +Mikulov-Kienberk +( +Czech Republic +); 10 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1849 + +/0023/0002, +Bad Vöslau +, including specimen illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 6, fig. 9) + +; 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1849 + +/0023/0002a, +Bad Vöslau +, specimen illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 6, fig. 10) + +; 3 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0048, +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +), including specimen illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 2, fig. 4. + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 35 +C1–C2: Gainfarn ( +Austria +): SL: +53.4 mm +, MD: +26.5 mm +, +NHMW +1856/0050/ 0115; +Figs 35 +D1–D3: +syntype +, Enzesfeld ( +Austria +): SL: +48.8 mm +, MD: +26.7 mm +, +NHMW +1846/0037/0049, illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 3, fig. 7); +Figs 35 +E1–E3: Mikulov-Kienberk ( +Czech Republic +): SL: +47.5 mm +, MD: +23.8 mm +, +NHMW +1860/0001/0067; +Figs 35 +F: Gainfarn ( +Austria +): SL: +58.4 mm +, MD: +29.2 mm +, +NHMW +1856/ 0050/0115; +Figs 35 +G1–G2: Gainfarn ( +Austria +): SL: +30.6 mm +, MD: +14.3 mm +, +NHMW +1846/0037/0043a; +Fig. 30 +R: Gainfarn ( +Austria +): SL: +30.1 mm +, MD: +15.2 mm +, +NHMW +1846/0037/0043a. + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized moderately slender shells; spire coeloconoid to conical and of variable height. Spire whorls channelled, moderately convex to nearly flat; early spire whorls scalariform, strongly tuberculate and striate (but rarely preserved); later whorls with more or less prominent striae, which may fade out completely on last whorls. Subsutural flexure deep, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl elongate, slightly ventricose, very weakly constricted with weak spiral grooves on abapical third; shoulder high, more or less prominent, rounded to subangular; position of maximum diameter slightly below shoulder. Siphonal canal short, weakly recurved; siphonal fasciole indistinct. Aperture straight, moderately narrow. Colour pattern under UV light only poorly preserved, consisting of a dense pattern of thin, roughly spirally arranged short dashes and slightly spirally extended dots. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +20 adult +specimens (only large morphs): largest specimen: SL: +58.4 mm +, MD: +29.2 mm +, mean SL: +51.9 mm +(σ = 3.3), mean MD: +27.2 mm +(σ = 1.5), spire angle: µ = 98.3° (σ = 10.4°), last whorl angle: µ = 35.1° (σ = 1.9°), LW: µ = 1.91 (σ = 0.1), RD: µ = 0.63 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.89 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.17 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +Hall (1966: 137) +discussed a close relation of + +Conus vindobonensis + +with + +Conus ventricosus +Gmelin, 1791 + +, which would result in a placement in + +Lautoconus + +. The tuberculate, depressed scalariform early spire, however, contradicts a relation with + +Lautoconus + +. In any case, +Hall (1966) +was correct to interpret this species as a very polymorphic species comparable to the extant + +Lautoconus ventricosus + +. Especially the height of the spire and the convexity of the spire whorls are very variable. Similarly, the outline of the last whorl ranges from slightly ventricose to nearly straight-sided. Like the recent + +L. ventricosus + +, the spire of the Miocene + +C. vindobonensis + +tends to be more or less gradate in some specimens. Consequently, the high spired, gradate specimens illustrated by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, figs 10–11) +as + +Conus mediterraneus + +are most probably aberrant specimens of + +Conilithes vindobonensis + +. Therefore, + +Conus mediterraneus +var. +pupoidemiocenica + +and +permiocenica +, which were introduced by +Sacco (1893b) +as new names for these specimens, are subjective junior synonyms of + +Conus vindobonensis + +. The same holds true for the aberrant specimen illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 2, fig. 4) as + +Conus clavatus + +, for which +Sacco (1893b) +introduced the superfluous varietal name +mioexclavata +, although already +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +identified this specimen as their + +Conus vindobonensis + +. + + +Hall (1966: 137) +considered this species to be a subjective junior synonym of + +Conus argillicola +Eichwald, 1830 + +, from the Badenian of Ukraine. The specimen illustrated by +Eichwald (1852, pl. 9, fig. 2) +as + +C. argillicola + +differs from + +C. vindobonensis + +in its constricted base and the long and reflected siphonal canal. Moreover, the spiral striae on the spire whorls of + +C. argillicola + +are much stronger. Therefore, we doubt that both taxa represent the same species. Unfortunately, we were not able to find the type specimen(s) of + +C. argillicola + +to solve this question definitely. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Typically found in shallow marine nearshore environments; at Gainfarn, where it is among the most frequent cones, it was associated with seagrass. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Enzesfeld, Steinebrunn, Baden, Baden-Sooß, Bad Vöslau, Möllersdorf, Pötzleinsdorf, Grinzing, ( +Austria +), Mikulov-Muschelberg, Mikulov-Kienberk, Hrušovany ( +Czech Republic +), +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin: +Marz, Forchtenau ( +Austria +); +Styrian Basin: +Pöls; +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep: +Grund, Guntersdorf ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Sieber 1958a +, +b +), Korytnica, Węglinek, Łychów ( +Poland +) ( +Krach 1981 +; +Bałuk 1997 +); +Pannonian Basin: +Hidas ( +Hungary +) ( +Strausz 1966 +); +Transylvanian Basin +: Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Boettger 1902 +); + +Buzău +Basin + +: Crivineni, Valea Muscel ( +Romania +); +Zârand Basin +: Minişul de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Nicorici & Sagatovici 1973 +); +Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: +Valea Satului ( +Romania +) ( +Hinculov 1968 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0BFF18FF5FAE77FE7944AC.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0BFF18FF5FAE77FE7944AC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e638560f673 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0BFF18FF5FAE77FE7944AC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,583 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conus + +s.l. + +olivaeformis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + + + + + +Figs 30 +Q, 35A1–A3, 35B1–B3 + + + + + +[ + +Chelyconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +olivaeformis + +n. f. +— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +olivaeformis + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 52 + +, pl. 1, fig. 23. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +fusiformis + +nov. form.—Halaváts 1884: 174, pl. 4, figs 2a–c [non + +Conus fusiformis +Lamarck, 1810 + +; non + +Conus fusiformis +Pease, 1861 + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +oliviformis + +[sic] Hö. Au.— + +Boettger 1902 +: 9 + +. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +praelongus fusiformis +Halaváts, 1884 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 461 + +, text-fig. 208. + + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +praelongus +Hoernes & Auinger—Atanacković 1969: 214 + +, pl. 13, figs 4–4b [non + +Conus + +s.l. + +praelongus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +praelongus + +( +Hoernes und Auinger 1879 +)— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 178 + +, pl. 39, figs 16–17 [non + +Conus + +s.l. + +praelongus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + + + +Varioconus olivaeformis +( +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 85 + +, figs 125–130. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +oliviformis + +[sic] +Hoernes et Auinger 1879 +—Bohn-Havas 1973: 1122, pl. 7, figs 5–6. + + + + +FIGURE 35A1–A3. + +Conus + + +s. +l. + + +olivaeformis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1858/0035/0008, syntype. +35B1–B3. + +Conus + + +s. +l. + + +olivaeformis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania). NHMW 1854/0035/0046, syntype. +35C1–C2. + +Conus + +s.l. + +vindobonensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1856/0050/0115, syntype. +35D1–D3. + +Conus + +s.l. + +vindobonensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Enzesfeld (Austria), NHMW 1846/0037/0049, syntype. +35E1– E3. + +Conus + +s.l. + +vindobonensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Mikulov-Kienberk (Czech Republic), NHMW 1860/0001/0067. +35F. + +Conus + +s.l. + +vindobonensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1856/0050/0115. +35G1–G2. + +Conus + +s.l. + +vindobonensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1846/0037/0043a. +35H1–H3. + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Mikulov-Muschelberg, NHMW 1847/0037/0027. +35I1–I3. + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Mikulov- Muschelberg (Czech Republic), NHMW 1847/0037/0027. +35J. + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), private collection Anton Breitenberger. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0046, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, fig. 23) + + +; + +10 syntypes + +NHMW +1858 + +/0035/0008, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +; middle Miocene, Badenian (Langhian). The type locality of + +Conus fusiformis +Halaváts, 1884 + +, considered to be a junior synonym of + +C. olivaeformis + +, is the middle Miocene (Badenian) locality Hidas in Hungary. + + +Studied material. +Syntypes. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 35A +1 +–A3: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +24.5 mm +, MD: +12.6 mm +, +NHMW +1858/0035/0008; +Figs 30 +Q, 35B1–B3: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +21.9 mm +, MD: +10.4 mm +, +NHMW +1854/0035/0046, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 23) +. + + +Revised description. +Small subcylindrical shells; high conical protoconch comprising c. 3 whorls; mammillate spire of medium height, with weakly tuberculate whorls; later spire whorls flat to weakly convex, forming conical to cyrtoconoid spire; suture narrow but impressed, very irregular. Surface glossy, smooth except for delicate growth lines, not striate. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Shoulder indistinct to rarely subangulate. Narrow spiral grooves on base, delimiting broader cords. Siphonal fasciole very short, moderately swollen, poorly demarcated from thin and narrow inner lip. Moderately narrow aperture, adapically distinctly narrowing; siphonal canal moderately wide, short. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of three indistinct spiral bands of blotches, which are composed of densely spaced spiral dashes; additional dashes appear between these bands. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 7: largest specimen: SL: +24.5 mm +, MD: +12.6 mm +, mean SL: +22.3 mm +(σ = 2.0), mean MD: +11.2 mm +(σ = 1.0), spire angle: µ = 87.7° (σ = 6.1°), last whorl angle: µ = 36.6° (σ = 2.7°), LW: µ = 2.0 (σ = 0.08), RD: µ = 0.6 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.87 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.16 (σ = 0.05). + + + + +Discussion. +The spire height and shape are variable and the pointed apex and the tuberculate early spire are usually eroded. +Hall (1966) +listed this well-defined species as a synonym of + +Lautoconus ponderosus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +, which was probably a mistake. + +Lautoconus ponderosus + +is much larger, broader and has a distinctly more conical last whorl. + + + +Halaváts (1884) described this species as + +Conus fusiformis + +. This name is preoccupied by + +Conus fusiformis +Lamarck, 1810 + +and + +Conus fusiformis +Pease, 1861 + +. Halaváts (1884) discussed similarities with + +Lautoconus praelongus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +and +Strausz (1966) +considered this taxon a subspecies of + +L. praelongus + +. Both species differ in the much lower spire, the more ventricose and cylindrical last whorl, and the incised suture of + +L. olivaeformis +. + +The +holotype +of + +Conus fusiformis +Halaváts, 1884 + +was stored in the collection of the +Geological +and +Geophysical Institute +of +Hungary +in +Budapest +but seems to be lost (pers. comm. Klára Palotás). +The +specimen illustrated by +Halaváts +(1884) does not differ from + +L. olivaeformis + +and we consider it to be a subjective junior synonym of + +Conus olivaeformis + +. +Therefore +, no replacement name for the preoccupied + +C. fusiformis + +is necessary. + + + +Paleoenvironment. +No information. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Pannonian Basin: +Hidas, Letkés, Pécsszabolcs ( +Hungary +) (Halaváts 1884; +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +);? +southern Pannonian Basin +: Miljevići, Hrvaćani ( +Bosnia and Herzegovina +) ( +Atanacković 1985 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Boettger 1902 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0BFF1AFF5FA8E1FDAF4099.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0BFF1AFF5FA8E1FDAF4099.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7d67c0344ec --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0BFF1AFF5FA8E1FDAF4099.xml @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conus + +sensu lato +2 + + + + +Note. +This group comprises + +Conus olivaeformis + +and + +C. vindobonensis +. +Conus argillicola + +is too poorly known to allow a clear decision, but based on its overall morphology, we provisionally also place it here. Like species grouped in + +Conus + +sensu lato +1, these shells develop tuberculate early spire whorls and may form spiral cords. The main difference is the presence of spiral grooves on the base of the last whorl, which differ strongly in the mode of formation from the spiral cords seen in + +Conus + +s.l. +1. Again, these species are reminiscent of + +Lautoconus + +species, but differ by their tuberculate spire whorls. Subadult specimens of + +Conus vindobonensis + +are even reminiscent of + +Conilithes + +, but the shallower and less asymmetrical subsutural flexure and the comparatively stout and ventricose last whorl exclude a closer relation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0BFF1AFF5FAA30FDB144C4.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0BFF1AFF5FAA30FDB144C4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4a09f857f6a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0BFF1AFF5FAA30FDB144C4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,211 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conus argillicola +( +Eichwald, 1830 +) + + + + + +C. +[ +onus +] + +argillicola + +m.— +Eichwald 1830 +: 222. + + + + + + +Conus argillicola + +— +Eichwald 1852 +: plates captions, pl. 9, figs 2a–b. + +Con. +argillicola + +m.— + +Eichwald 1853 +: 206 + +. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntypes +described by +Eichwald (1830) +from Salisze about +50 km +NE of +Ternopil +( +Ukraine +) (see map in + +Dubois de +Montpéreux + +1831) + +, + +syntype +illustrated in +Eichwald (1852, pl. 9, fig. 2) +. The specimens are most probably stored in the Zoological Museum of +St. Petersburg +( +Russia +) but could not be detected; middle Miocene, Badenian ( +Langhian +). + + + + + +Discussion. +Eichwald (1830 +, +1852 +, +1853 +) described and figured a medium-sized species (SL: c. +38 mm +, MD: c. +18 mm +) with a conical spire of weakly convex whorls with a deep suture and prominent spiral cords. Its last whorl develops a rounded shoulder and an elongate, weakly ventricose last whorl with a long and reflected siphonal canal. In the description +Eichwald (1853) +mentioned nodulose tubercles on the early spire whorls, which are not visible on the illustration. + + +Although +Hall (1966) +synonymized this species with + +Conus vindobonensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, the two taxa are not very similar. Especially the elongate last whorl and the long siphonal canal exclude conspecificity with + +Conus + +s.l. + +vindobonensis + +. Moreover, the spiral cords on the spire whorls of +C. +s.l. + +vindobonensis + +are always much weaker. +Bałuk (1997) +treated + +Conus argillicola + +as a subjective junior synonym of + +Conus pyrula +Brocchi, 1814 + +. The Pliocene + +Lautoconus pyrula + +, however, lacks spiral cords, is broader, and has rounded shoulders and very prominent and broad spiral cords on the base. The illustration of +Eichwald (1852) +does not correspond unambiguously to any other Paratethyan and Mediterranean species and the status of + +Conus argillicola + +remains unclear without observation of +type +specimens or new material. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Carpathian Foredeep +: Salisze at Tarnów ( +Ukraine +), Korytnica ( +Poland +) ( +Eichwald 1830 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0CFF1DFF5FA93AFDB146CA.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0CFF1DFF5FA93AFDB146CA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ceac3d7a2b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0CFF1DFF5FA93AFDB146CA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,369 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conus + +s.l. + +sturi +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + + + + + +Figs 30 +N, 34G1–G3, +Figs 34 +H1–H3 + + + + +[ + +Chelyconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Sturi + +n. f.— +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 (nomen nudum). + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Sturi + +nov. form.— +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 41, pl. 5, figs 9 +– +10.? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +suessi +var. +posticestriatus + +n. var. +—Kojumdgieva in +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 212, pl. 50, fig. + +3. + + + +non + +Conus +cf. +Sturi + +R. Hoern. i. Auinger—Friedberg 1911: 53, pl. 2, fig. 15 [= + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0043a, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 5, fig. 9) + + +; + +syntype + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0043b, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 5, fig. 10) + +; +11 syntypes + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0045 + +, NHMW 1854/0035/0047, + + +NHMW +1858 + +/ 0043/0003, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes. + + +Illustrated material. +Fig. 30 +N: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +38.1 mm +, MD: +17.1 mm +, +NHMW +1854/0035/0043a, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 5, fig. 9) +; +Figs 34 +G1–G3: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +43.7 mm +, MD: +20.5 mm +, +NHMW +1854/0035/0043b, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 5, fig. 10) +; +Figs 34 +H1–H3: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +49.1 mm +, MD: +22.1 mm +, +NHMW +1854/0035/ 0 0 47. + + + + +Description: +Medium-sized, moderately solid shells with medium high mammillate-conical spires and elongate conical last whorls. First 5–6 spire whorls high and conical, forming pointed apex, tuberculate along lower suture; striate. Later spire whorls distinctly striate, convex, forming low dome-shaped spire; suture impressed but narrow. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Rounded shoulder coinciding with position of maximum diameter. Last whorl elongate conical, not constricted. Narrow aperture, narrowing adapically, only weakly widening towards short, weakly recurved siphonal canal. Siphonal fasciole narrow, indistinct. Sculpture of last whorl consisting of wide-spaced, convex spiral cords, which may be largely reduced on adapical half. Colour pattern not well preserved; spiral cords appear as light spiral bands in UV light; spirally arranged small speckles seem to be present on upper half of last whorl. + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 8: largest specimen: SL: +49.1 mm +, MD: +22.1 mm +, mean SL: +41.3 mm +(σ = 4.5), mean MD: +18.3 mm +(σ = 2.0), spire angle: µ = 89.8° (σ = 5.6°), last whorl angle: µ = 30.5° (σ = 1.1°), LW: µ = 2.3 (σ = 0.11), RD: µ = 0.55 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.89 (σ = 0.01), RSH: µ = 0.19 (σ = 0.02). + + + + +Discussion. +A characteristic feature of this species is the spiral cords on the last whorl, which are true cords on the shell surface and not just intervening shell surface between spiral groves as seen in + +Plagioconus +lapugyensis. + +The Italian Burdigalian + +Conus mucronatolaevis +Sacco, 1893 + +is quite similar but differs in the lower position of the shoulder and lacks the raised spiral cords on the base. Indirectly, +Hall (1966) +considered + +Conus sturi + +as a synonym of + +Conus pyrula +Brocchi, 1814 + +(by referring to a figure in Friedberg 1911 and not to the original description of +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +), which is incorrect in respect to the much broader and slightly ventricose shell of + +Lautoconus pyrula + +(see +holotype +in +Pinna & Spezia 1978 +). + + + + + +Conus suessi +var. +posticestriatus +Kojumdgieva in +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov (1960) + +, from the Badenian of +Bulgaria +, is fragmentary but seems to represent a + +Conus + +s.l. + +sturi + +with a low spire. The specimen from the Badenian of +Ternopil +( +Ukraine +) described by Friedberg (1911) as + +Conus +cf. +sturi + +is stored in the collections of the Geological Survey of +Austria +(GBA +1911/2/1 +) and represents a subadult + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The sandy sediment infill with elphidiid foraminifers indicates shallow water habitats. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +);? +Dacian Basin: +Radomirci ( +Bulgaria +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0EFF1DFF5FAA1AFCB54192.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0EFF1DFF5FAA1AFCB54192.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2e80dc07dab --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0EFF1DFF5FAA1AFCB54192.xml @@ -0,0 +1,459 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conus + +s.l. + +praelongus +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + + + + + +Figs 30 +L, 34B1–B3, +Figs 34 +C1–C3, +Figs 34 +D1–D2 + + + + + +[ + +Chelyconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +praelongus + +n. f. +— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +praelongus + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 45 + +, pl. 1, fig. 16. + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +praelongus + +( +Hoernes und Auinger 1879 +)—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 213 + +, pl. + + +50, fig. 7. + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +praelongus +Hoernes & Auinger—Atanacković 1969: 214 + +, pl. 13, figs 4–4b [maybe + +Conus + +s.l. + +olivaeformis +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 + +]. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +praelongus + +( +Hoernes und Auinger 1879 +)— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 178 + +, pl. 39, figs 16–17 [maybe + +Conus + +s.l. + +olivaeformis +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 + +]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0034a, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, fig. 16) + +, +10 syntypes + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0034, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 34 +B1–B3: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +44.9 mm +, MD: +19.5 mm +, +NHMW +1854/0035/0034; +Figs 30 +L, 34C1–C3: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +40.8 mm +, MD: +17.5 mm +, +NHMW +1854/0035/0034a, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 16) +; +Figs 34 +D1–D2: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +32.3 mm +, MD: +14.9 mm +, +NHMW +1854/0035/0034. + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized olivoid shells; pointed apex with tuberculate early spire whorls; later spire whorls weakly convex to nearly flat, striate, forming a high, nearly straight-sided conical to weakly cyrtoconoid spire. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Very indistinct shoulder coinciding with slight angulation and position of maximum diameter; last whorl moderately elongate, weakly ventricose, not constricted. Siphonal canal very short, moderately wide, straight; fasciole very weak and indistinct; few thin spiral threads on base. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of wide-spaced spirals of long dashes, intercalated by 1–2 weaker spirals of shorter dashes. If uppermost shell layer is eroded, these spirals are underlain by a dense pattern of spirals covering the entire shell. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 11: largest specimen: SL: +44.9 mm +, MD: +19.5 mm +, mean SL: +33.7 mm +(σ = 1.8), mean MD: +14.9 mm +(σ = 2.6), spire angle: µ = 71.5° (σ = 3.1°), last whorl angle: µ = 33.8° (σ = 1.1°), LW: µ = 2.3 (σ = 0.1), RD: µ = 0.58 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.87 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.23 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +The strong spiral pattern on the +syntype +illustrated by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +is somewhat misleading, as it represents a specimen with corroded uppermost shell layer. These spirals are just a colour pattern and do not represent a spiral sculpture as suggested by Halaváts (1884) and +Strausz (1966) +. The stout, robust specimen with somewhat ventricose last whorl, illustrated by +Atanacković (1969 +, +1985 +) as + +Conus praelongus +, + +might represent another species. + +Lautoconus praelongus + +differs from the slightly similar + +Leporiconus suessi +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +, + +Leporiconus transsylvanicus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +and + +Conus +s.l. + + +sturi + +Hoernes & Auinger, +1879 + + +in its higher conical spire, shorter last whorl and lower position of the shoulder. + + +Paleoenvironment. +No information. + + + + +FIGURE 34A1–A4. + +Conus + +s.l. + +johannae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1949/0005/0003. +34B1–B3. + +Conus + + +s. +l. + + +praelongus +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/0035/0034, syntype. +34C1–C3. + +Conus + + +s. +l. + + +praelongus +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), 0NHMW 1854/0035/0034a, syntype. +34D1–D2. + +Conus + + +s. +l. + + +praelongus +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/0035/0034. +34E1–E3. + +Conus + +s.l. + +posticestriatus +Kojumdgieva in Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov, 1960 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1999z0077/0024. +34F1–F3. + +Conus + +s.l. + +posticestriatus +Kojumdgieva in Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov, 1960 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/0035/0038, holotype. +34G1–G3. + +Conus + +s.l. + +sturi +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/ 0035/0043b, syntype. +34H1–H3. + +Conus + +s.l. + +sturi +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/0035/ 0 0 47, syntype. +34I. + +Conus + +s.l. + +johannae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/0332. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin: +Forchtenau ( +Austria +) ( +Sieber 1956 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); Dacian Basin: Staropatica ( +Bulgaria +) ( +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0FFF1FFF5FAA8AFD4A4372.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0FFF1FFF5FAA8AFD4A4372.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3e0c748961b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF0FFF1FFF5FAA8AFD4A4372.xml @@ -0,0 +1,331 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conus + +s.l. + +posticestriatus +Kojumdgieva in +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov, 1960 + + + + + +Figs 30 +M, 34E1–E3, 34F1–F3 + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Suessi +Varietät + +III—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 44 + +, pl. 6. figs 3–4.? + +Conus + +an + +Suessi + +R. Hoern. i Auinger—Friedberg 1911: 61, text-fig. 15. + + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Lautoconus +) +posticestriatus +Kojumdgieva—Bałuk 1997: 58 + +, pl. 23, figs 7–8. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +suessi +var. +posticestriatus + +n. var. +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 212 + +, pl. 50, fig. 3 [? = + +Conus + +s.l. + +sturi +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +: + +NHMW +1999 + +z0077/0024, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 6, fig. 3) + +; middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material +. +Holotype +and 1 spec. + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0038, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 6, fig. 4) + +. + + + +Illustrated material +. +Figs 34 +E1–E3: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +49.8 mm +, MD: +27 mm +, +NHMW +1999z0077/0024, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig. 3) +; 30M, +Figs 34 +F1–F3: +holotype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +50.4 mm +, MD: +25.2 mm +, +NHMW +1854/0035/0038, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig. 4) +. + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized, biconical, moderately robust shells; tall, mammillate spire, conical with impressed suture; early spire whorls flat, striate with broad tubercles along carina, which is placed at the lower suture on earliest whorls, migrating slightly adapically on later whorls, to be placed a short distance above lower suture, making later whorls weakly angular. Deeply incised, narrow, slightly pitted spiral grooves separate 6 regular, narrow spiral cords on sutural ramp; surface smooth below angulation. Last spire whorl with concave sutural ramp. Shoulder slightly angulated; last whorl weakly convex; subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, nearly symmetrical. Aperture moderately narrow, slightly widening anteriorly; very narrow anal notch. Siphonal fasciole and inner lip indistinct; siphonal canal short, feebly reflected; faint spiral threads on base. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of wide-spaced flammulae on shoulder and numerous spirals of close-spaced dashes on last whorl. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. +Holotype +: SL: +49.8 mm +, MD: +27 mm +, spire angle: 80°, last whorl angle: 37, LW: 1.8, RD: 0.66, PMD: 0.86, RSH: 0.18; spire angle: 95°, last whorl angle: 37°; second specimen: SL: +50.4 mm +, MD: +25.2 mm +, LW: 2.0, RD: 0.64, PMD: 0.85, RSH: 0.22. + + + + + +Discussion. +When introducing + +Conus suessi +var. +posticestriatus +Kojumdgieva in +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov (1960) + +designated the specimen illustrated by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig 3) +as the +holotype +. As already pointed out by +Bałuk (1997) +, the Bulgarian specimen identified by Kojumdgieva in +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov (1960) +is not conspecific with the +type +from +Lăpugiu de Sus. The +illustrated Bulgarian specimen is fragmentary and seems to represent + +Conus + +s.l. + +sturi +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +. +Bałuk (1997) +applied + +posticestriatus + +to shells from the Badenian of +Poland +, which correspond fairly well with + +Conus posticestriatus + +in outline but are rather poorly preserved and thus, the identification remains doubtful. Moreover, the spiral threads on the last whorl are not seen in the Polish specimens. + + + +The stout biconical outline and especially the characteristic deeply incised narrow spiral grooves on the spire of + +Plagioconus +posticestriatus + +separate it distinctly from + +Leporiconus suessi + +. The mode of sculpture formation on the spire whorls differs fundamentally from the striae and cords of other Paratethyan species and characterises this species. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The specimens contained sand with elphidiid foraminifers suggesting a shallow water environment. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene):? +Carpathian Foredeep: +Korytnica ( +Poland +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF10FF01FF5FAB68FE2545AB.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF10FF01FF5FAB68FE2545AB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..28dcef7ce5c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF10FF01FF5FAB68FE2545AB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conus + +sensu lato +1 + + + + +Note. +This species group comprises + +Conus posticestriatus +Kojumdgieva in +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov, 1960 + +, + +C. praelongus +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, + +C. sturi +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +and maybe + +C. johannae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +. All are characterized by medium-sized to moderately large and elongate shells with medium high, conical spire. All have distinctly tuberculate early spire whorls and a striate spire; the subsutural flexures are shallow and moderately curved. Raised spiral cords on the last whorl are typical and may reach up to the shoulder. The broad spiral cords of + +C. johannae + +are comparable but not identical with these spiral cords. In respect to the strikingly similar morphology of the early spire whorls, we provisionally place this species here. + + + + +The shells are reminiscent of + +Lautoconus + +species in general shell shape. The striate spire whorls would not contradict a placement in this genus as well. The prominently tuberculate early spire whorls, however, are unknown in + +Lautoconus + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF10FF1EFF5FAD63FEFF43C2.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF10FF1EFF5FAD63FEFF43C2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4b6921d7f20 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF10FF1EFF5FAD63FEFF43C2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,275 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conus + +s.l. + +johannae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + + + + + +Figs 30 +O, 34A1–A +4, 34I + + + + + +[ + +Chelyconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Johannae + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Johannae + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 40 + +, pl. 1, fig. 4. + + + + + + +non + +Conus johannae +R. Hoern. et Auing. + +— + +Eremija 1959 +: 187 + +, pl. 1, figs 6-6a [maybe a subadult + +Monteiroconus antiquus +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +or a + +Plagioconus + +species]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1949 + +/0005/0003, illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, fig. 4) + + +, + +syntype + +NHMW +1869 + +/0001/0332, all +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +(late +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes +and +4 subadult +spec. +NHMW +A458, all +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 30 +O, 34A1–A4: Steinebrunn ( +Austria +): SL: +75.5 mm +, MD: +38.9 mm +, +NHMW +1949/ 0005/0003, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 4) +; + +Figs +34 + +I: Steinebrunn ( +Austria +), SL: 73.0 mm, MD: +38.6 mm +, +NHMW +1869/0001/0332. + + +Revised description. +Moderately large, robust shells; mammillate spire regularly conical, elevated. Early spire whorls with tuberculate keel and distinct striae; later spire whorls convex, bulgy; only weakly striate with deep suture. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical; subangulated middle spire whorls, rounded penultimate whorl; dense pattern of growth lines on spire. Last whorl with rounded shoulder, position of maximum diameter slightly below; last whorl slender, regularly conical, not constricted; aperture moderately narrow, broadening towards short, weakly recurved canal; fasciole weak, slightly twisted and not well demarcated from base. Last whorl covered by broad, indistinct spiral cords. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of flammulae on shoulder and spire whorls; last whorl with about 15 broad spirals of subquadratic blotches, coinciding with spiral cords. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +Only two adult specimens are available: SL: 75.5/73.0 mm, MD: 38.9/ +38.6 mm +, spire angle: 91/97°, last whorl angle: 32/33°, LW:1.94/1.89, RD: 0.63/0.65, PMD: 0.88/0.93, RSH: 0.18/0.19. + + + + +Discussion. +This rare species is highly reminiscent of + +Lautoconus subraristriatus + +(Pereira da + +Costa +, 1866 + +) in overall shape and size and could be easily confused with the widespread species. Nevertheless, the tuberculate keel and prominent striae on the early spire of + +C. johannae + +and its conspicuous colour pattern allow a clear separation. The colour pattern is unique within Paratethyan +Conidae +. The record of this species from the Croatian Karlovac- Glina Basin by +Eremija (1959) +is based on a misidentification. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The co-occurring mollusc assemblage is indicative for shallow sublittoral enbvironments ( +Sieber, 1958b +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Steinebrunn ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +). The occurrence of this species in the Tortonian of Barcelona, mentioned by Faura I Sans (1908), needs confirmation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF11FF00FF5FAA8AFED946BC.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF11FF00FF5FAA8AFED946BC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d0a0be37e45 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF11FF00FF5FAA8AFED946BC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,263 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Pseudonoduloconus wagneri +( +Boettger, 1902 +) + + + + + + +Figs +33 + +I1–I3 + + + + + + +Conus +( +Stephanoconus +) +wagneri + +n. sp. +— + +Boettger 1902 +: 7 + +. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Stephanoconus +) +wagneri +Boettger—Zilch 1934: 276 + +, pl. 22, figs 9a–b. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +, illustrated by +Zilch (1934, pl. 22, fig. 9) +, Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt/Main, German, +SMF + +XII.2204 + +a, +Coşteiu de Sus +( +Romania +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian. + + + +Studied material. +Holotype. + + + +Illustrated material. + +Figs + +33 + + +I1–I3: +Holotype +, +SMF + +XII.2204 + +a; coll. +O. Boettger +1899, SL: 15.0 mm, diameter: +8.5 mm +, +Coşteiu de Sus +( +Romania +); picture +Sigrid Hof +, courtesy +Ronald Janssen +, section +Malacology +, +Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut Frankfurt +/ +Main. + + + +Revised description. +Stout, biconical shell with moderately high, coeloconoid to conical spire; spire whorls with bulgy rim along lower suture and shallow mid-whorl concavity; striate. Subsutural flexure moderately deep, asymmetrically curved. Blurred nodes on shoulder, causing strongly undulating suture. Distinctly angulated shoulder; last whorl slightly ventricose, weakly constricted at base; entirely covered by very weak spiral cords. Siphonal fasciole weakly swollen and twisted. Aperture and siphonal canal largely destroyed. No colour pattern preserved. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +SL: 15.0 mm, MD:. +8.5 mm +, spire angle: 85°, last whorl angle: 50°, LW: 1.76, RD: 0.79, PMD: 1.09, RSH: 0.28. + + + + +Discussion. +This is a poorly known species, documented only by its +holotype +, which might represent a subadult specimen. Despite the small size, the sculpture of the spire whorls suggests a placement in + +Pseudonoduloconus +Tucker & Tenorio, 2009 + +. The lack of tubercles on early spire whorls does not contradict this allocation as the extant +type +species + +P. carnalis + +( +Sowerby III, 1879 +) lacks tubercles as well. Nevertheless, this feature allows a separation from the two other Paratethyan species of this genus, which both have strongly tuberculate early spire whorls. Hence, we can exclude that the shell is just a juvenile of + +P. austriacus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +or + +P. gastaldii +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +. + + +Kovács & Balász (2016) +treated + +Conus wagneri +Boettger, 1902 + +as a junior synonym of + +Conilithes granularis +(Borson) + +[herein described as + +Artemidiconus granularis +( +Borson, 1820 +) + +]. In our opinion, both taxa differ considerably in outline and spire sculpture. Especially the nodulose shoulder and the moderately deep and asymmetrical subsutural flexure of + +P. wagneri + +differ considerably from + +A. granularis + +. Moreover, it lacks the characteristic beads on the last whorl of + +A. granularis + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Unknown. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Transylvanian Basin: +Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Boettger 1902 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF12FF00FF5FABD9FA1543C2.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF12FF00FF5FABD9FA1543C2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..531d2e6bbda --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF12FF00FF5FABD9FA1543C2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,448 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Pseudonoduloconus gastaldii +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + + + + + +Figs 33 +F1–F3 + + + + + +Conus Gastaldii + +mihi—Michelotti 1847: 344. + + + + + +Conus nocturnus +Lamarck—Neugeboren 1858: 106 + +[non + +Conus nocturnus +Lamarck, 1810 + +, non + +Conus nocturnus + +[ +Lightfoot], 1786 +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Stephanoconus +) +subcoronatus + +n. sp. +— + +Boettger 1887 +: 4 + +, pl. 2, figs 9a–b. [ + +Conus + +] + +Stephanoconus Gastaldii +(Micht.) + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 117 + +, pl. 11, fig. 10. + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] +S. +[ +tephanoconus +] + +Gastaldii + + +var. +supracompressa +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 117 + +, pl. 11, fig. 11. + + + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] +S. +[ +tephanoconus +] + +Gastaldii + + +var. +superneasulcata +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 117 + +, pl. 11, fig. 12. + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] +S. +[ +tephanoconus +] + +Gastaldii + + +var. +supraproducta +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 117 + +, pl. 11, fig. 13. + + + + + + + +Conus gastaldii +Michelotti, 1847 + +— + +Hall 1966 +: 147 + +, pl. 24, figs 16, 20 [cum syn.]. + + + + +Stephanoconus gastaldii +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +—Ferrero-Mortara +et al +. 1984: 134, pl. 21, figs 5a–5b. + + + + +Pseudonoduloconus gastaldii + +— + +Tucker & Tenorio 2009 +: 114 + +, fig. 20 left. + + + + + +Type material. +Syntype, illustrated by +Sacco (1893b, pl. 11, fig. 10) +, Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Torino (BS.038.08.003), Turin Hills, early Miocene, Burdigalian. The type locality of + +Conus subcoronatus +Boettger, 1887 + +, considered to be a junior synonym of + +P. gastaldii + +, is the middle Miocene (Badenian) locality Lăpugiu de Sus in Romania. + + + +Studied material. +1 spec. +SMF + +XII.2246 + +a, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 33 +F1–F3: +SMF + +XII.2246 + +a coll. +O. Boettger +ex +G. Schmidt +1885, SL: +50.1 mm +, MD: +26.8 mm +, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +); +holotype +of + +Conus subcoronatus +Boettger, 1887 + +; picture +Sigrid Hof +; courtesy +Ronald Janssen +, section +Malacology +, +Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut Frankfurt +/ +Main. + + + +Revised description. +Moderately large and robust shell with low spire; early spire whorls tuberculate just above suture. Spire whorls striate, weakly convex with wide, blurred nodes (= pseudo-nodes sensu +Tucker & Tenorio 2009 +); suture undulose. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Rounded shoulder with blurred nodes; position of maximum diameter slightly below shoulder; last whorl elongate, faintly ventricose, weakly constricted. Aperture and siphonal canal largely destroyed; siphonal fasciole indistinctly swollen. Few prominent spiral cords on base. No colour pattern preserved. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +Holotype +: SL: +50.1 mm +, MD: +26.8 mm +, spire angle: 112°, last whorl angle: 32°, LW: 1.87, RD: 0.63, PMD: 0.95, RSH: 0.15. + + + + +Discussion. +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +placed this rare species in + +Pseudonoduloconus + +based on the conspicuous spire sculpture; this was followed by +Kovács & Balász (2016) +, who treated the Paratethyan + +Pseudonoduloconus subcoronatus + +as distinct species. The illustration in +Boettger (1887) +is misguiding and suggests a broader shell with slightly opisthocline and very prominent nodes. In fact, the +holotype +is a rather slender shell with low spire, which does not differ from the Italian Burdigalian morphotype described by +Sacco (1893b, pl. 11, fig. 13) +as + +Conus gastaldii supraproducta + +. Therefore, we consider + +Conus subcoronatus +Boettger, 1887 + +to be a subjective junior synonym of + +Conus gastaldii +Michelotti, 1847 + +. It is not surprising that +Boettger (1887) +did not recognise the synonymy because the first figures of + +Conus gastaldii + +were published much later by +Sacco (1893b) +. + + +This species is distinguished from + +P. austriacus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +by its distinctly more slender outline, the less constricted base, the narrower and higher spire and the more swollen “pseudo-nodes”. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Unknown. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Boettger 1887 +). + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +northeastern Atlantic +: + +Burdigalian (early Miocene): +Turin Hills +( +Sacco 1893b +); + +Aquitaine +Basin + +: Léognan, Mérignac, Saint-Paul-lès-Dax ( +France +) ( +Peyrot 1931 +); middle Miocene (Langhian): Langhian + +: + + +Aquitaine +Basin + +: Manciet ( +France +) ( +Peyrot 1931 +, as + +Conus subnocturnus +, d’Orbigny, 1852 + +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF13FF02FF5FA9E2FF7C4258.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF13FF02FF5FA9E2FF7C4258.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b221b2310f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF13FF02FF5FA9E2FF7C4258.xml @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + +Genus + +Pseudonoduloconus +Tucker & Tenorio, 2009 + + + + + + + + +Type +species (by original designation): + +Conus carnalis +Sowerby III, 1879 + +. Recent. +Western +Africa. + + + + +According to +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +this genus is characterised by shells with false nodules, formed by elevations at the junction of the shoulder and major growth lines. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Based on the species included in the genus by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +the shells have spiral cords or faint spiral striae on the spire whorls, which are more or less concave. Aside from the spire sculpture, the species are reminiscent of + +Monteiroconus + +species. The genus is restricted to +Western +Africa + +; + +Miocene and Pliocene species are documented from the proto-Mediterranean Sea and the +Eastern +Atlantic including the +Azores +. This genus was not treated by + +Puillandre +et al. +(2014b) + +, but accepted by + +Puillandre +et al +. (2014a) + +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF13FF03FF5FABF3FAA84236.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF13FF03FF5FABF3FAA84236.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..de6c23f6f31 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF13FF03FF5FABF3FAA84236.xml @@ -0,0 +1,424 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Pseudonoduloconus austriacus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 30 +P, 33G1–G2, 33H1–H4 + + + + + +[ + +Dendroconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +austriacus + +n. f. +— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + +[ + +Dendroconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] +Reussii +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +austriacus + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 19 + +, pl. 2, figs 2–3. + + + + + +Conus +Dendroconus Reussi + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 20 + +, pl. 2, fig. 1. + + + + + + +Conus (Lithoconus) mercati austriacus +Hoernes et Auinger—Glibert 1952a: 374 + +, pl. 13, fig. 2. + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) cf. +austriacus +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Bałuk 1997 +: 60 + +, pl. 20, figs 6–8. + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercatti + +[sic] +caniculatodepressa +Sacco—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + +, pl. 2, figs 2a–b [non + +Monteiroconus mercati +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1875 + +/0009/0001, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), specimen illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 2, fig. 2) + + +; + +syntype + +NHMW +1866 + +/0011/0106, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), specimen illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 2, fig. 3) + + +; + +syntype + +NHMW +1853 + +/0003/0002, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes +and 1 spec. + +NHMW +1847 + +/0037/0030, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +) + +, holotype of + +Conus reussi +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 33 +G1–G2: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +73.8 mm +, MD: +46.3 mm +, +NHMW +1875/0009/0001, specimen illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 2, fig. 2) +; +Figs 30 +P, 33H1–H4: +syntype +, Steinebrunn ( +Austria +): SL: 112.0 mm, MD: +62.8 mm +, +NHMW +1866/0011/0106, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 2, fig. 3) +. + + +Revised description. +Moderately large to large pyriform shells of up to +112 mm +height. Spire ranging from flat to very low conical; early spire whorls with granulose spiral threads on adapical half; tuberculate along lower suture. Later whorls striate with weak concavity in adapical half and convex abapical part developing large, wide, blurred nodes; suture undulose. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Shoulder angulated; position of maximum diameter distinctly below shoulder passing into relatively elongate last whorl; markedly constricted at base with long, moderately wide, nearly straight siphonal canal. Siphonal fasciole indistinct with prominent growth lines; very weak spiral cords on base; faint spiral cords on last whorl, visible only in tangential light. Colour pattern under UV light only seen on spire whorls, consisting of broad flammulae. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +Only three shells are more or less completely preserved: largest specimen: SL: 112.0 mm, MD: +62.8 mm +, mean SL: +92.6 mm +(σ = 19.1), mean MD: 54.0 mm (σ = 8.3), spire angle: µ = 142° (σ = 4.4), last whorl angle: µ = 39.3° (σ = 2.1), LW: µ = 1.7 (σ = 0.1), RD: µ = 0.64 (σ = 0.04), PMD: µ = 0.85 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.09 (σ = 0.04). + + + + +Discussion. +This rare species is recognized easily by its pyriform shape and the undulose suture around the broad nodes of the spire whorls and the tuberculate early spire whorls. These features separate it well from + +Monteiroconus +. + +We place this species in + +Pseudonoduloconus + +based on the low spire, striate spire whorls, tuberculate early spire whorls and the undulose suture. + + +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +already discussed if their + +Conus reussi + +might simply represent a very large + +C. austriacus + +but separated it based on its larger size and because of the less distinct nodes on the spire. Both morphs were collected at the same locality (Steinebrunn); the single specimen of + +C. reussi + +has a worn spire and therefore the sculpture is partly abraded. Aside from the size, there is little reason to separate this specimen and we consider + +C. reussi + +a subjective junior synonym of + +Pseudonoduloconus austriacus + +(as already proposed by +Bałuk 1997 +). + + +A specimen from the Tortonian of Stazzano in +Italy +, described by +Sacco (1893a) +as + +Conus mercati subaustriacus + +, might also represent this species, but is too fragmentary for a clear identification. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The Austrian localities Gainfarn and Steinebrunn represent shallow water environments with sea grass (e.g. + +Zuschin +et al. +2007 + +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Steinebrunn ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Sieber 1958b +); +Carpathian Foredeep +: Korytnica ( +Poland +); +Transylvanian Basin +: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) (NHMW collection). + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and northeastern Atlantic: +Langhian (middle Miocene): +Loire Basin +: Ferrière- Larçon ( +Glibert 1952a +); Tortonian (late Miocene):? Stazzano (Italy) (as +subaustriacus +in +Sacco 1893a +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF15FF02FF5FAD13FC00402A.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF15FF02FF5FAD13FC00402A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8302cade4d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF15FF02FF5FAD13FC00402A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,765 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Plagioconus + + +puschi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + + + + + +Figs 30 +J, 33A1–A3, 33B1–B3, 33C1–C3 + + + + + +Conus Puschi + +mihi—Michelotti 1847: 340, pl. 14, fig. 6. + + + +Conus Puschi +Micht. + +—Hörnes 1851: 35, pl. 4, figs 6 +– +7. + + + + + +Conus Haueri +Partsch—Hörnes 1851: 34 + +(partim), pl. 4, fig. 5. + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +elatus + +] + +var. +haueriana +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893a +: 35 + +[nov. nom pro + +Conus haueri +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 4, fig. 5]. + + + + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) + +] + +Puschi + +] + +var. +postica +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 60 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus Puschi +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 4, fig. 6]. + + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) + +] + +Puschi + +] + +var. +sulcopostica +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 60 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus Puschi +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 4, fig. 7, erroneously given as fig. 5 by Sacco 1893]. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +puschi +Micht. + +— + +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956 +: 419 + +, pl. 10, figs 3 +– +4. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +puschi +Michelotti—Pavlovsky 1957: 53 + +, pl. 2, figs 5a–b. + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +puschi +Michelotti—Strausz 1962: 144 + +, pl. 70, figs 2–4. + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +puschi +Michelotti—Atanacković 1963: 78 + +, pl. 15, figs 5–5a. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +puschi +Michelotti, 1847 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 460 + +, pl. 70, figs 2–4. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +puschi +Michelotti, 1847 + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 150 + +, pl. 38, figs 3a–b. + + + +? + +Conus puschi +Michelotti—Davoli 1972: 128 + +, pl. 8, figs 17-20. + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +puschi +Michelotti, 1847 + +— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 176 + +, pl. 39, figs 7–8. + + + + + +Plagioconus + + +puschi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 81 + +, figs 106–107. + + + + + +Plagioconus + + +puschi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +— + + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +: 245 + +, pl. 39, fig. 5, pl. 41, fig. 13, pl. 42, fig. 7, pl. 81, fig. 9. + + + + +non + +Conus puschi +Michelotti, 1847 + +— + +Hall 1966 +: 158 + +, pl. 27, figs 10, 14, 19. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +puschi +Michelotti—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 4, figs 1a–b [= + +Plagioconus + + +extensus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype +illustrated by + +Michelotti +(1847, pl. 14, fig. 6) + +, +Tortona +, +Italy + +; + +the specimen might have been stored in the collections of the +Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra +, +Sapienza Università di Roma +but parts of the +Michelotti +collection were destroyed during +WWII +( + +Manni +2005 + +); +type +specimen is lost according to + +Hall +(1966) + +; late +Miocene +, Tortonian. The +type +locality +Tortona +was questioned by + +Sacco +(1893b) + +. +In +addition to the +Italian +specimen(s), + +Michelotti +(1847) + +referred also to material from the +Burdigalian +of +Bordeaux +( +France +) + +. + + +Studied material. +1 spec. NHMW 2013/0479/1615, 4 spec. NHMW 2013/0479/1616, 4 spec. NHMW 2013/ 0479/2042, 5 spec. + + +NHMW +1855 + +/0045/0368, all +Gainfarn +( +Austria +); 2 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1851 + +/0013/0062, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 4, fig. 7), 3 spec + +. NHMW 1860/0001/0062; 4 spec. NHMW 1846/0037/0026, 2 spec. + + +NHMW +1884 + +/2869, 1 spec. GBA 1856/004/0004/01 illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 4, fig. 6), all +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +); 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0024, +Grinzing +( +Austria +), illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 4, fig. 5). + + + +Illustrated material. +Fig. 30 +J: Steinebrunn ( +Austria +), SL: +60.6 mm +, MD: +22.1 mm +, +NHMW +1846/0037/0026; +Figs 33A +1 +–A3: Gainfarn ( +Austria +): SL: +98.7 mm +, MD: +37.8 mm +, +NHMW +2013/0479/1615; +Figs 33 +B1–B3: Gainfarn ( +Austria +): SL: +78.6 mm +, MD: +27.9 mm +, +NHMW +1860/0001/0062; +Figs 33 +C1–C3: Gainfarn ( +Austria +): SL: +66.20 mm +, MD: +24.7 mm +, +NHMW +1851/0013/0062, illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 4, fig. 7). + + +Revised description. +Moderately large to large shell, up to ca. +100 mm +in height; elongate slender outline with moderately elevated conical spire. Early spire whorls weakly angulated and beaded, later whorls convex with deep suture. Subsutural flexure of medium depth, strongly curved, strongly asymmetrical. Shoulder broadly rounded, position of maximum diameter slightly below shoulder; last whorl straight sided, not constricted at base. Spiral threads on late spire whorls and along shoulder of last whorl; spiral grooves may appear on lower third of last whorl, becoming stronger and closely spaced abapically. Aperture narrow, slightly narrowing adapically; siphonal canal almost straight, fasciole weak. No colour pattern preserved. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +17 adult +and subadult specimens: largest specimen: SL: +98.7 mm +, MD: +37.8 mm +, mean SL: 76.0 mm (σ = 9.4), mean MD: +28.8 mm +(σ = 3.8), spire angle: µ = 75.1° (σ = 5.4°), last whorl angle: µ = 22.2° (σ = 1.8°), LW: µ = 2.64 (σ = 0.15), RD: µ = 0.48 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.95 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.21 (σ = 0.02). + + + + +Discussion. + +Plagioconus +puschi + +is reminiscent of subadult + +P. elatus +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +, which lack the prominent shoulder of adult specimens. Both species can be distinguished based on the nearly diagonal and shallow subsutural flexure of + +P. puschi + +and the angulation of the spire whorls of + +P. elatus + +. Moreover, fully grown specimens of + +P. elatus + +are always distinctly larger. + + +Sacco (1893b) +doubted that the specimens from the +Vienna +Basin are conspecific with the Italian + +P. puschi + +and proposed new names for each of the two shells illustrated by Hörnes (1851): + +Conus postica + +and + +C. sulcopostica + +. Both shells derive from Steinebrunn in the northern +Vienna +Basin and represent a subadult and a fully grown specimen. Therefore, + +Conus postica +Sacco, 1893 + +and + +Conus sulcopostica +Sacco, 1893 + +are considered subjective junior synonyms of + +Conus puschi +Michelotti, 1847 + +. The +syntype +of + +Conus haueri +Hörnes, 1851 + +(pl. 4, fig. 5) is also + +Plagioconus +puschi + +—a fact that was already recognized by +Hall (1966) +. Therefore, + +Conus haueriana +Sacco, 1893 + +, which was introduced as new name for that specimen, is also a subjective junior synonym of + +Conus puschi +Michelotti, 1847 + +. + + +The specimen from +Bosnia +, illustrated by Atanacković (1963, 1985, same specimen in both papers) has a marked angulation of the last whorl and might rather be an aberrant + +Plagioconus + + +extensus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +. The shells illustrated by +Hall (1966) +as + +Conus puschi + +differ in their dome-shaped spire and represent a different species. Similarly, the specimens illustrated by +Davoli (1972) +differ in their high conical spire and might belong to another species. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Typically found in shallow water assemblages; for some localities sea grass meadows are documented (e.g. Gainfarn, + +Zuschin +et al +. 2007 + +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Steinebrunn, Bad Vöslau, Baden, Niederleis ( +Austria +), Mikulov-Kienberk, Hrušovany ( +Czech Republic +) (Hörnes 1851); +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Grund ( +Austria +), Lysice ( +Czech Republic +) (Hörnes 1851; +Sieber 1956 +); +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin +: Forchtenau ( +Austria +); +Pannonian Basin: +Devecser, Diósd, Letkés, Magyaregregy, Szob, Zebegény ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +southern Pannonian Basin +: Zapešić-Brijeg at Samobor ( +Croatia +); +Banja Luka Basin: +Miljevići ( +Bosnia and Herzegovina +) ( +Pavlovsky 1957 +), +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Boettger 1902 +, +1906 +); +Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: +Valea Satului ( +Romania +) ( +Hinculov 1968 +). + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and northeastern Atlantic. +Widespread during the early Miocene to late Miocene in the northeastern Atlantic and the Proto-Mediterranean Sea; the species persists into the Pliocene in the Mediterranean Sea (see + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +for detailed references). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF17FF04FF5FADFFFEAD4478.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF17FF04FF5FADFFFEAD4478.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..58024fbbc44 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF17FF04FF5FADFFFEAD4478.xml @@ -0,0 +1,447 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Plagioconus + + +marii +(Sacco, 1893) + + + + + + +Figs +30 + +I, 32F1–F3, 32G1–G3 + + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] + +Chelyconus Marii +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 62 + +, pl. 6, fig. 1. + + + + + +Conus marii +(Sacco), 1893 + +— + +Hall 1966 +: 148 + +, pl. 26, figs 21–22 [? figs 8, 15, 16]. + + + + +Chelyconus marii +Sacco, 1893 + +—Ferrero-Mortara 1984: 114, pl. 17, figs 8a–b. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +extensus +Partsch—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 2, figs 1a–b [ +non + +Conus extensus +Hörnes, 1851 + +]. + + + + + +Plagioconus + + +marii +(Sacco, 1893) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 81 + +(partim), figs 101–105 [ +non +fig. 108 + += +Plagioconus + + +austriaconoe +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +marii +Sacco—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 4, figs 2a–b. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Lectotype +BS.038.05.020 in +Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali +, +Torino +; +Albugnano +( +Italy +), middle +Miocene +, illustrated in + +Sacco +(1893b, pl. 6, fig. 1) + +; designated herein. + + + +Studied material. +2 spec. NHMW 1846/0037/0025, 1 spec. + + +NHMW +1851 + +/0013/0019, +Vöslau +( +Austria +) + +; 1spec. NHMW 1874/0024/0001, 1 spec. + + +NHMW +1869 + +/0001/0160, +Baden +( +Austria +) + +; + +5 spec + +NHMW +2013 + +/0300/ 0 529 (4 spire fragments) +Baden-Soo +( +Austria +) + +. + + + +FIGURE 33A1–A3. + +Plagioconus + + +puschi +(Michelotti, 1847) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 2013/0479/1615. +33B1–B3. + +Plagioconus + + +puschi +(Michelotti, 1847) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1860/0001/0062. +33C1–C3. + +Plagioconus + + +puschi +(Michelotti, 1847) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1851/0013/0062. +33D1–D3. + +Plagioconus +lapugyensis + +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879), Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1870/0033/0006a, syntype. +33E1–E3. +Coşteiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1867/ 0019/0005. +33F1–F3. + +Pseudonoduloconus gastaldii +(Michelotti, 1847) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania) SMF XII.2246a. +33G1–G2. + +Pseudonoduloconus austriacus +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1875/0009/0001, syntype. +33H1–H4. + +Pseudonoduloconus austriacus +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1866/0011/0106, syntype. +33I1–I3.. + +Pseudonoduloconus wagneri +(Boettger, 1902) + +, Coşteiu de Sus (Romania); SMF XII.2204a, holotype. + + + +Illustrated material. + +Figs +30 + +I, 32F1–F3: Baden-Soo ( +Austria +): SL: 67.0 mm, MD: 21.0 mm, +NHMW +2013/ 0300/0529; +Figs 32 +G1–G3: Vöslau ( +Austria +): SL: +67.8 mm +, MD: +23.4 mm +, +NHMW +1846/0037/0025. + + +Revised description. +Moderately large shell with maximum height of nearly +70 mm +; elongate outline with elevated conical spire comprising at least 13 whorls; spire height varies considerably. Early spire whorls angulated and beaded. Later spire whorls subangular without beads, with faint spiral grooves strongest along the angulation and below. Deeply incised suture; subsutural flexure very deep, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last whorl with strongly rounded shoulder and position of maximum diameter close below shoulder; straight sided with very slight constriction at base. Aperture narrow, narrowing adapically. Inner lip with callous notch and weak parietal callus. Siphonal canal moderately long, straight; fasciole indistinct, slightly twisted. Last whorl with narrow, finely wavy spiral grooves over lower half of last whorl. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +4 adult +and subadult specimens: largest specimen: SL: +67.8 mm +, MD: +23.4 mm +, mean SL: +64 mm +(σ = 5.4), mean MD: +21.4 mm +(σ = 1.5), spire angle: µ = 55.3° (σ = 3.8°), last whorl angle: µ = 24.8° (σ = 1.0°), LW: µ = 2.99 (σ = 0.16), RD: µ = 0.47 (σ = 0.01), PMD: µ = 0.93 (σ = 0.01), RSH: µ = 0.29 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +The Paratethyan shells are very well preserved and show even the delicate beads on the early spire and the spiral sculpture on spire whorls and last whorl. These features are not preserved in the Italian +type +specimens but the size and general shape agree well. Unfortunately, +Sacco (1893b) +based this species on occurrences from different early and middle Miocene localities in the Turin Hills. These specimens represent +syntypes +and therefore, the designation of a +holotype +as proposed by +Hall (1966) +is inappropriate. To clarify this situation. the specimen from the middle Miocene of Albugnano illustrated by +Sacco (1893b, pl. 6, fig. 1) +is designated herein as the +lectotype +(inventory number BS.038.05.020 according to Ferrero-Mortara +et al +. 1984). + + +In the NHMW collections this species was mixed with + +P. puschi + +due to the superficial similarity in outline. Its rareness in the Paratethys might thus rather be an artefact. It differs from + +P. puschi + +and + +P. elatus + +in the shorter last whorl, the comparatively higher spire and higher spire whorls, the deep subsutural flexure and the smaller size. Moreover, the occurrences in coastal shallow water settings ( + +P. puschi +, +P. elatus + +) versus offshore clays ( + +P. marii +) + +suggest an ecological and bathymetric separation. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The species is only known from offshore clays of the inner to outer shelf. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Bad Vöslau, Baden, Baden-Sooß ( +Austria +) (own data); +Pannonian Basin +: Letkés ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Chira & Voia 2001 +). + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +northeastern Atlantic. + +Burdigalian ( +Italy +: Colli Torinesi), Langhian ( +Italy +: Albugnano). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF18FF06FF5FAF7FFCA0445C.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF18FF06FF5FAF7FFCA0445C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e4c5bea11b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF18FF06FF5FAF7FFCA0445C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,329 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Plagioconus +lapugyensis + +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + +Figs 30 +D, 33D1–D3, 33E1–E3 + + + + + +Conus avellana +Lam. + +—Hörnes 1851: 29 (partim), pl. 3, fig. 3d [non + +Conus avellana +Lamarck, 1810 + +; non figs 3a–c, = + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis +(Sacco, 1893) + +. + + + +[ + +Chelyconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] +Lapugyensis +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Lapugyensis + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 42 + +, pl. 1, fig. 9, pl. 5, fig. 8. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1870 + +/0033/0006a, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, fig. 9) + + +, + +syntype + +NHMW +1867 + +/0019/0004, +Coşteiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 5, fig. 8) + + +. + +7 syntypes + +NHMW +1867 + +/0019/0005, +Coşteiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +; + +4 syntypes + +NHMW +1870 + +/ 0033/0006, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 30 +D, 33D1–D3: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +), SL: +60.6 mm +, MD: +28.2 mm +, +NHMW +1870/0033/0006a, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 9) +; +Figs 33 +E1–E3: +syntype +, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +), SL: +44.6 mm +, MD: 22.0 mm, +NHMW +1867/0019/0005. + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized to moderately large, not very solid, elongate pyriform shells with mammillate spire and pointed apex with weakly coeloconoid initial part. Early spire whorls carinate, coarsely beaded; suture deeply canaliculated, undulating; later spire whorls convex with deep suture; weakly striate. Subsutural flexure of medium depth, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last spire whorl slightly broader and inflated, forming a strongly convex shoulder coinciding with position of maximum diameter. Last whorl constricted mid-whorl passing into moderately narrow, long, weakly recurved canal. Distinct spiral grooves on lower half of last whorl demarcating flat to weakly convex cords. Aperture narrow; fasciole weak, slightly twisted, usually with 2–3 strongly raised growth lines from previous siphonal canal margins. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of flammulae on shoulder reaching down on upper part of last whorl; below on last whorl follow spirally arranged short dashes and speckles, arranged into discontinuous bands and into irregular axial stripes. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 10: largest specimen: SL: +60.6 mm +, MD: +28.2 mm +, mean SL: +44.8 mm +(σ = 8.2), mean MD: +21.4 mm +(σ = 3.2), spire angle: µ = 98.2° (σ = 5.1°), last whorl angle: µ = 34.3° (σ = 1.9°), LW: µ = 2.1 (σ = 0.15), RD: µ = 0.6 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.89 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.17 (σ = 0.05). + + + + +Discussion. +Despite some superficial similarities, this rare species differs from + +Leporiconus suessi +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +in its shorter and more dome-shaped spire, the canaliculated suture, the broad, inflated last spire whorl, the constricted base, the pyriform outline and the prominent spiral cords on the base. It can generally be distinguished from Paratethyan + +Leporiconus + +species by its strongly asymmetrical subsutural flexure. + + +This species was synonymized with + +Lautoconus pelagicus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +by +Hall (1966) +from which it is distinguished by its spire shape, the canaliculated suture and elongate pyriform outline. In addition, the colour pattern of + +L. pelagicus + +, as described by +Hall (1966) +and + +Landau +et al +. (2013) + +differs from + +Plagioconus +lapugyensis. + + +Conus sturi +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +and + +Leporiconus transsylvanicus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +differ in their well defined tubercles on early spire whorls. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Unknown; the fine grained sediment infill might indicate offshore habitats. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Boettger 1902 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF18FF09FF5FA9C1FEB947DC.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF18FF09FF5FA9C1FEB947DC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7c36d718053 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF18FF09FF5FA9C1FEB947DC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,285 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Plagioconus + + +hirmetzli +( +Kovács & Vicián, 2013 +) + + + + + +Figs 30 +E, 32H, +32I +, 32J + + + + +2013 + +Leptoconus hirmetzli + +sp. n. +—Kovács & Vicián, 62, figs 30–37. + + + + +Type material. +Holotype HNHM PAL 2013.3.1 (Hungarian Natural History Museum), paratypes HNHM PAL 2013.4. + +1, +HNHM +PAL +2013.5.1– + +PAL +2013.9 + +.1 ( +Hungarian Natural History Museum +) and private collection of +Tamás Hirmetzl +( +Hungary +), all from +Letkés +( +Hungary +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + +Illustrated material. +Fig. 32 +H: paratype, SL: +130 mm +, MD: +34 mm +, private collection of T. Hirmetzl; + +Fig. + + +32 + + + +I: +paratype +, SL: +67 mm +, MD: +17 mm +, private collection of +T. Hirmetzl +, + +Fig. +32 + +J: +holotype +, SL: +62 mm +, MD: +21 mm +, +HNHM +, +PAL +2013.3.1; +Fig. 30 +E: SL: +114 mm +, MD: +32.3 mm +, private collection +Anton Breitenberger +( +Bad Vöslau +, +Austria +); all Letkés (Hungary). + + +Revised description. +Large, elongate, slender, biconical shell with very high spire and strongly elongate last whorl; protoconch paucispiral. Early spire whorls weakly angulate, tuberculate; later spire whorls high and convex. Suture deeply incised; subsutural flexure very deep, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last whorl with rounded to subangulate shoulder; position of maximum diameter slightly below shoulder; straight sided to faintly concave, not constricted at base; smooth surface. Aperture very narrow with subparallel margins. Fasciole very weak, twisted; siphonal canal slightly reflected and long. No colour pattern preserved. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +Holotype +: height (fragmentary): +62 mm +, MD: +21 mm +, spire angle: 31°, last whorl angle: 19°; +paratype +1: height (fragmentary): +132 mm +, MD: +42 mm +, spire angle: 38°, last whorl angle: 18°; +paratype +2: height (fragmentary): +130 mm +, MD: +34 mm +, spire angle: 35°, last whorl angle: 21°. + + + + +Discussion. +This is a very rare species, which is only known so far from its early Badenian +type +locality Letkés in +Hungary +. Due to the peculiar morphology, +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +placed the species in + +Leptoconus + +Swainson +, 1840 + + +. They referred to the comparably elongate and slender + +Leptoconus milneedwardsi +( +Jousseaume, 1894 +) + +, which is an extant species in the Indo-West Pacific Region, and to + +L. aratispira +( +Pilsbry, 1905 +) + +, from Pleistocene of +Japan +. Aside from these two extremely elongate species, + +Leptoconus + +species, like the extant +type +species + +Leptoconus amadis +( +Gmelin, 1791 +) + +, have low conical spires. All develop angulated whorls, tend to have concave adapical parts of the spire whorls and many species have sculptured last whorls. The high and convex spire whorls of + +Plagioconus +hirmetzli + +, the deep suture and smooth shell surface do not support the placement in + +Leptoconus + +. Therefore, we consider the similarity between the Miocene species with the extant + +L. milneedwardsi + +to represent a striking case of convergent evolution and consider it an extraordinarily high spired + +Plagioconus + +species comparable with + +Plagioconus + + +marii +(Sacco, 1893) + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The locality Letkés comprises a mixed assemblage of partly reworked taxa ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); the frequent occurrence of corals suggests a shallow marine depositional environment. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene). +Pannonian Basin +: Letkés ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF19FF09FF5FA8E1FC75400F.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF19FF09FF5FA8E1FC75400F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..da81e91ea5c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF19FF09FF5FA8E1FC75400F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,474 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Plagioconus + + +extensus +(Hörnes, 1851) + + + + + +Figs 30 +K, 32C1–C3, 32D, 32E1–E3 + + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] + +extensus + +n. sp. +— + +Hauer 1837 +: 416 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + + +Conus extensus +Partsch—Hörnes 1851: 37 + +, pl. 5, figs 1a–c. + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +extensus +Partsch—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 34 + + +. + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +extensus + +Partsch—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 421, pl. 11, figs 7–8. + + + +? + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +extensus +(Partsch in +Hörnes 1856 +) + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 210 + +, pl. 49, fig. 6. + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +extensus +Partsch—Strausz 1966: 453 + +, pl. 67, figs 11–12. + + + +Conus extensus +Partsch—Wank 1981: 285 + +, pl. 1, fig. 2. + + + +Conus +( +Phasmoconus +) +extensus +Partsch—Schultz 1989: 72 + +, pl. 29, fig. 13. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +puschi +Michelotti—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 4, figs 1a–b [non + +Plagioconus + + +puschi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +]. + + + + + +Plagioconus + + +extensus +(Partsch in +Hörnes, 1856 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 79 + +, figs 97–100. + + + + + +Conus extensus +Partsch—Fözy & + +Szente 2014 +: 311 + + +, text-fig. 5. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +extensus +Partsch—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 2, figs 1a–b [= + +Plagioconus + + +marii +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +2 syntypes + +NHMW +1847 + +/0037/0031, +Baden +( +Austria +), including specimen illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 1), middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +(late +Langhian +). + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes and 1 spec. NHMW 1869/0001/0159, 1 spec. + + +NHMW +1997 + +z0178/0871, +Badenian Baden +( +Austria +); 2 spec + +. NHMW 2015/0391/0001 including specimen illustrated in +Schultz (1998, pl. 29, fig. 13) +, 3 spec. NHMW 1872/0030/0017, 10 spec. + + +NHMW +2013 + +/0300/0525, all Baden-Sooß ( +Austria +); 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1855 + +/0045/0370, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +), 3 spec + +. NHMW 1854/00035/0053, 3 spec. NHMW 1854/0035/0052, 2 spec. NHMW 1855/0043/0003, 2 spec. NHMW 1859/0037/0001, 1 spec. NHMW 1868/0001/0384, 2 spec. NHMW 1866/0040/0247, 4 spec. NHMW 1875/0009/0005, 1 spec. NHMW 1875/0009/0004, 2 spec. NHMW 1890/0001/ 0 0 11, 2 spec. NHMW 1890/0001/0013, 2 spec. NHMW 1973/1615/0062, 3 spec. NHMW 2015/0392/0001, 8 spec. NHMW 2015/0392/0002, 2 spec. + + +NHMW +1858 + +/0043/0004, all +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1867 + +/ 0019/0010, +Coşteiu de Sus +( +Romania +): 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +2015 + +/0393/0001, +Nemeşeşti +( +Romania +). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 32 +C1–C3: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +89.3 mm +, MD: +35.3 mm +, +NHMW +1890/ 0001/0011; +Figs 32 +D: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +), SL: 89.0, MD: 36.0 mm, +NHMW +1859/0037/0001; +Figs 30 +K, 32E1–E3: Baden-Sooß ( +Austria +): SL: 96.0 mm, MD: +33.2 mm +, +NHMW +1872/0030/0017. + + +Revised description. +Large shells comprising at least 10 tall teleoconch whorls; spire short, conical to weakly coeloconoid. Early whorls angular above suture with coarse beads, central angulation becoming mid-whorl inflation abapically. Sutural ramp bearing subsutural collar/band and spiral striae developed to a variable degree; ramp becoming increasingly concave abapically. Suture deeply impressed. Subsutural flexure very deep, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last whorl very elongate, weakly constricted at base; moderately round shoulder with position of maximum diameter a short distance below shoulder. Aperture narrow, widening abapically. Siphonal canal long, weakly recurved; fasciole elongate, slightly twisted and demarcated from narrow glossy inner lip by a narrow notch. Base covered by very delicate spiral grooves on adapical half; grooves become stronger and wider abapically; usually somewhat irregular and pitted. Colour pattern in UV light consisting of light flammulae on spire whorls and shoulder of last whorl parallel to subsutural flexure; indistinct bands on last whorl. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +12 adult +and subadult specimens: largest specimen: SL: +107 mm +, MD: +39 mm +, mean SL: +88.2 mm +(σ = 10.4), mean MD: +32 mm +(σ = 3.7), spire angle: µ = 82.7° (σ = 4.3°), last whorl angle: µ = 22.3° (σ = 1.7°), LW: µ = 2.76 (σ = 0.19), RD: µ = 0.44 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.95 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.17 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +This species is characterized by the concave sutural ramp bearing spiral striae, the distinct but rounded shoulder and rather moderate variability in outline. The largest variability is represented by the more or less prominent spiral sculpture. Hörnes (1851) had only a single complete specimen at hand, which has been largely destroyed thereafter; only the spire is preserved. Since then, numerous shells were collected at Baden, Baden-Sooß and Lăpugiu de Sus. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The majority of shells were collected in basinal clays. In contrast, only a single specimen was found in the seagrass environment of Gainfarn ( +Austria +). This suggests that + +Plagioconus +extensus + +was probably an offshore species. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep: +Grund ( +Austria +) ( +Sieber 1947 +); + +Vienna +Basin: + +Baden, Baden-Sooß, Gainfarn, Steinebrunn ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Sieber 1958b +); +Lavanttal Basin: +Mühldorf ( +Austria +) (Wank 1981); +Pannonian Basin +: Hont, Letkés, Szob ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus, Nemeşeşti ( +Romania +) ( +Boettger 1902 +, +1906 +; +Chira & Voia 2001 +); +Dacian Basin +: Opanec ( +Bulgaria +) ( +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +). No reliable occurrences from the proto-Mediterranean Sea are known to date. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF1CFF0AFF5FAF17FE76462B.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF1CFF0AFF5FAF17FE76462B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f0ce5d94bc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF1CFF0AFF5FAF17FE76462B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,452 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Plagioconus elatus +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + + + + + +Figs 30 +H, 32A1–A3, 32B1–B2 + + + + + +Conus elongatus + +nobis—Borson 1820: 198, pl. 1, fig. 4 [non + +Conus elongatus +Holten, 1802 + +]. + + + +Conus elatus + +mihi—Michelotti 1847: 341, pl. 13, figs 16–16’. + + + +Conus Haueri +Partsch—Hörnes 1851: 34 + +(partim), pl. 4, figs 4a–b? [non fig. 5 = + +Plagioconus + + +puschi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +Haueri +Partsch—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 33 + + +(partim). + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] + +Leptoconus elatus +(Micht.) + +— + +Sacco 1893a +: 35 + +. + + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +haueri +(Partsch in +Hörnes 1856 +) + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 210 + +, pl. 49, fig. 1. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +austriaconoae +Sacco 1893 + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 212 + +, pl. 50, fig. 2 [non + +Conus austriaconoe +d’Orbigny, 1852 + +]. + + + + +Conus elongatus +Borson—Pavia 1976: 157 + +, pl. 2, fig. 11. + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +elongatus +Borson, 1820 + +— + +Bałuk 2006 +: 216 + +, pl. 16, fig. 8. + + + + + +Plagioconus elatus +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +— + +Tucker & Tenorio 2009 +: 111 + +, pl. 6, fig. 5. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype +or +holotype +illustrated by +Michelotti (1847, pl. 13, fig. 16) +, Tortona, +Italy +; the specimen might have been stored in the collections of the +Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra +, +Sapienza Università di Roma +but parts of the Michelotti collection were destroyed during +WWII +( +Manni 2005 +); +type +specimen is lost according to +Hall (1966) +; late Miocene, Tortonian. + + + +Studied material. +1 spec. NHMW 1997z0178/1471, 1 spec. NHMW 1856/0050/0114, 4 spec. NHMW 1855/ 0045/0367, 1 spec. + + +NHMW +1997 + +z0178/1473, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +); 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0023, +Grinzing +( +Austria +). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 32A +1 +–A3: Gainfarn ( +Austria +): SL: +91.6 mm +, MD: +38.4 mm +, +NHMW +1855/0045/ 0367; +Figs 30 +H, 32B1–B2: Grinzing ( +Austria +): SL: +103.8 mm +, MD: +37.3 mm +, +NHMW +1846/0037/0023. + + +Revised description. +Large shells; spire short with coeloconoid outline. Teleoconch comprising at least 12 whorls; early spire whorls beaded, rounded or with weak angulation in the middle, migrating towards lower suture on last whorls. Suture deeply incised, emphasized by weak subsutural inflation; delicate spiral threads appear on sutural ramp. Subsutural flexure deep, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last whorl slightly allometric in growth due to rapid widening of last two whorls. Sutural ramp relatively shallow and wide, distinctly shouldered at periphery, whorl straight below, hardly constricted at base. Aperture narrow; siphonal canal of moderate length and width; not recurved or twisted. Narrow, flattened inner lip demarcated from short fasciole by distinct notch. No spiral grooves on base. No colour pattern is preserved. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +8 adult +and subadult specimens: largest specimen: SL: +103.8 mm +, MD: +39 mm +, mean SL: +87.9 mm +(σ = 8.1), mean MD: +35.4 mm +(σ = 2.6), spire angle: µ = 82.4° (σ = 3.3°), last whorl angle: µ = 24.5° (σ = 1.2°), LW: µ = 2.48 (σ = 0.15), RD: µ = 0.50 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.96 (σ = 0.01), RSH: µ = 0.19 (σ = 0.02). + + + + +Discussion. +This species was frequently treated as + +Conus elongatus +Borson, 1820 + +(e.g. +Hall 1966 +; +Davoli 1972 +; +Bałuk 2006 +). This name, however, is preoccupied by + +C. elongatus +Holten, 1802 + +and consequently + +C. elatus +Michelotti, 1847 + +is the next available name. In the Paratethys, it was identified as + +Conus haueri +Hörnes, 1851 + +, which is a problematic species. The +syntype +illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 4, fig. 4) is lost and the spire whorls of the illustration display a weak concavity as typical for + +Monteiroconus antiquus + +. The +syntype +illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 4, fig. 5) is still preserved in the NHMW collection and is a specimen of + +Plagioconus +puschi + +. The +syntype +of + +Conus haueri + +from Grinzing mentioned by Hörnes (1851, not illustrated) and all other shells identified as + +C. haueri + +in the NHMW collection agree fully with + +Plagioconus elatus +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +as understood by +Hall (1966) +. Therefore, we consider + +Conus haueri +Hörnes, 1851 a + +nomen dubium +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +All Austrian specimens were found in assemblages from shallow sublittoral settings (e.g. + +Zuschin +et al. +2007 + +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Grinzing ( +Austria +); +Pannonian Basin +: Szob ( +Hungary +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Carpathian Foredeep: +Korytnica ( +Poland +) ( +Bałuk 2006 +); +Dacian Basin +: Opanec ( +Bulgaria +) ( +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +). + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +northeastern Atlantic. + +Burdigalian ( +Italy +: Colli Torinesi), Tortonian ( +Italy +: Sant'Agata Fossili, Stazzano Montegibbio). +A Pliocene +occurrence from Borzoli ( +Italy +) was mentioned by +Sacco (1893a) +but needs confirmation. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF1CFF0DFF5FAA52FB794664.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF1CFF0DFF5FAA52FB794664.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..881a4fd7737 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF1CFF0DFF5FAA52FB794664.xml @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Plagioconus +breitenbergeri + +nov. sp. + + + + +Figs 30 +G, 31G1–G5, 31H1–H2 + + + + +Holotype: +Figs 31 +G1–G5: SL: +43.6 mm +, MD: +17.6 mm +, NHMW 2016/0041/0001. + + +Paratype: +Figs 31 +H1–H2: SL: +43.9 mm +, MD: +16.1 mm +, NHMW 2016/0041/0002. + + + + +Paratype: +SL: +34.7 mm +, MD: +14.3 mm +, NHMW 2016/0041/0003. + + + + + +Additional material: +2 spec. + +NHMW +2016 + +/0041/0004, +Fig. 30 +G: SL: 31.0 mm, MD: +12.3 mm +, 1 spec. private collection +Anton Breitenberger +; all specimens from +Letkés +, +Hungary +. + + + +Type stratum: +fossil-rich marly sand with coral blocks and andesite boulders of the Sámsonháza Formation ( +Császár 1997 +). + + + + +Type +locality: + +Letkés +at the western part of the +Börzsöny Mts. +( +Hungary +); see + +Kovács +& +Vicián +(2013) + +for a map and description. + + + +Age: +Middle Miocene, early Badenian (= Langhian). + + + + +Etymology: +Referring to Anton Breitenberger, who collected and donated the +holotype +. + + + + +Description. +Medium-sized, slender elongate shells; spire mammillate, dome-shaped, high. Early spire whorls angulate just above suture, tuberculate. Tubercles become obsolete within 3rd–4th teleoconch whorl; angulation migrates to suture during ontogeny. Spire whorls weakly convex, faintly striate; suture narrowly impressed. Subsutural flexure very deep, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last whorl angulated; very slender, elongate, not constricted. Aperture narrow and only weakly widening anteriorly; siphonal canal long, straight to faintly recurved. Siphonal fasciole indistinct, narrow. Weak spiral cords on lower third of last whorl. Colour pattern in UV light consisting of broad axial stripes and flammulae on spire and shoulder. A light band below shoulder angulation follows in upper quarter of last whorl. Below appear broad, stretched zig-zag shaped axial streaks crossed mid-whorl by a spiral band; base and siphonal canal dark. + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 4: largest specimen: SL: +43.9 mm +, MD: +17.6 mm +, mean SL: +38.3 mm +(σ = 6.5), mean MD: +15.1 mm +(σ = 2.3), spire angle: µ = 84° (σ = 2.7°), last whorl angle: µ = 26° (σ = 1.4°), LW: µ = 2.54 (σ = 0.14), RD: µ = 0.50 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.89 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.21 (σ = 0.01). + + + + +Discussion. +This species is not rare at Letkés but was probably mistaken as subadult + +Plagioconus + + +marii +(Sacco, 1893) + +by +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +. It differs from + +Plagioconus +marii + +in its dome-shaped spire, the lower height of the spire whorls, the less impressed suture and the smaller size. + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis +Sacco (1893) + +and especially its + +globospira + +-morphotype develop a comparable spire but are broader and the last whorl is less elongate. The much deeper subsutural flexure allows a clear separation from + +Plagioconus + + +puschi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The locality Letkés comprises a mixed assemblage of partly reworked taxa ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); the frequent occurrence of corals suggests a shallow marine depositional environment. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): Pannonian Basin: Letkés ( +Hungary +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF1DFF0DFF5FAA8AFDB040BA.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF1DFF0DFF5FAA8AFDB040BA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4c22426479c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF1DFF0DFF5FAA8AFDB040BA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,308 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Plagioconus +bellissimus + +nov. sp. + + + + +Figs 30 +C, 31C1–C3, 31D1–D2, 31E1–E2, 31F1–F3 + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) + +sp.— + + +Caze +et al +. 2010 + +: 35 + +, fig. 5/M1-M2. + + + + + + + +Holotype +: + +Figs 31 +C1–C3: SL: 70.8, MD: +27.3 mm +, + +NHMW +1874 + +/0025/0002a, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + + + +Paratype +: + +Figs 31 +D1–D2: SL: 74.4, MD: +27.9 mm +, + +NHMW +1874 + +/0025/0002b, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + + + + + +Paratype +: + +Figs 31 +E1–E2: SL: 66.9, MD: 25.0 mm, + +NHMW +1890 + +/0001/0012a, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + + + +Paratype +: + +Fig. 30 +C: SL: 66.9, MD: +24.7 mm +, + +NHMW +1890 + +/0001/0012b, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + +Fig. +Figs 31 +F1–F3: SL: 58.7, MD: +24.4 mm +, Letkés (Hungary), private collection Anton Breitenberger (Bad Vöslau, Austria). + + + + +Additional material: +2 spec. NHMW 1874/0025/0002; 2 spec. NHMW 1890/0001/0012; 1 spec., + + +NHMW +1973 + +/1615/0069; all +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +. + + +Type stratum: +Badenian marly-clayey deposits with thin interlayers of sand and corallinacean limestones. + + + + +Type +locality: + +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + +Age: +Middle Miocene, early Badenian (= Langhian). + + + + +Etymology: +Referring to the aesthetic appearance of the species, which was overlooked so far in the collections. + + + + +Description. +Moderately large, very elongate shells; spire medium-high conical, somewhat variable in height; early spire pointed, angulated just above suture; suture canaliculated. Later spire whorls feebly convex, glossy with faint spiral threads, not striate; suture deeply impressed. Subsutural flexure deep, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Early spire whorls coarsely tuberculate at suture; tubercles usually covered by subsequent whorl. Last whorl convex, with rounded, sometimes bulgy shoulder coinciding with position of maximum diameter. Last whorl very elongate, conical, constricted at base. Siphonal canal very long, narrow, twisted, slightly reflected. Siphonal fasciole distinctly swollen, marked by densely spaced and prominent growth lines. Aperture narrow with subparallel margins, only weakly widening anteriorly. Wavy spiral grooves on base and lower quarter of last whorl may be developed. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of dense flammulae on spire and shoulder; last whorl with irregular pattern of densely spaced spirally arranged and amalgamating blotches, partly with vague axial arrangement. Two light (fluorescing) bands in the middle and lower third of the last whorl. + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 8: largest specimen: SL: +74.4 mm +, MD: +27.9 mm +, mean SL: +68.1 mm +(σ = 4.4), mean MD: +25.2 mm +(σ = 2.2), spire angle: µ = 86 ° (σ = 8.23), last whorl angle: µ = 24.3° (σ = 0.9°), LW: µ = 2.7 (σ = 0.07), RD: µ = 0.44 (σ = 0.01), PMD: µ = 0.95 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.16 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +This species was identified as + +Conus puschi + +in NHMW-collection lots and may also be mixed with + +Plagioconus + + +puschi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +in other museum collections. Both species, however, are readily distinguished by the higher spire, the broader and shorter siphonal canal and the less constricted base of + +P. puschi + +, which is also larger. In addition, + +P. puschi + +seems to have preferred shallow water environments, whereas + +P. bellissimus + +might rather represent an offshore species. Subadult specimens of + +Plagioconus + + +extensus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +are reminiscent of + +P. bellissimus + +due to the elongate shape and long siphonal canal but are distinguished by the sutural concavity and the prominent spiral cords. + +Plagioconus +lapugyensis + +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) differs in its striate spire whorls, the less elongate last whorl, the broader shoulder and the shorter siphonal canal. + + +Paleoenvironment. +All specimens from Lăpugiu de Sus are filled with clay, probably suggesting offshore environments as preferred habitat. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Transylvanian Basin +: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +); +Pannonian Basin +: Letkés (own data). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF1FFF0CFF5FA8E1FCD643C2.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF1FFF0CFF5FA8E1FCD643C2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..56abe690840 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FF1FFF0CFF5FA8E1FCD643C2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,684 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Plagioconus + + +austriaconoe +(Sacco, 1893) + + + + + +Figs 30 +F, 31A1–A3, 31B1–B3 + + + + + +Conus Noe +Brocc. + +—Hörnes 1851: 27, pl. 3, figs 1a–c [non + +Conus noe +Brocchi, 1814 + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Noe +Brocc. Var. + +— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 43 + +. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +Puschi +Michti. + +— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 34 + +(partim), pl. 5, fig. 7. + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] + +Chelyconus austriaconoe +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 85 + +[nov. nom. pro. + +Conus noe +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 3, fig. 1]. + + + + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) + +] + +pseudopuschi +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 60 + +(nov. nom. pro + +Conus puschi +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 5, fig. 7). + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +noe +Brocchi—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 3, figs 2a–b. + + + + + +Plagioconus + + +marii +(Sacco, 1893) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 81 + +(partim), fig. 108 [non + +Plagioconus + + +marii +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +austriaconoe +Sacco—Kautsky 1925: 146 + +, pl. 10, fig. 16 [= + +Lautoconus clavatulus +(d’Orbigny, 1852) + +]. +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +austriaconoae +Sacco 1893 + +—Kojumdgieva in +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 212, pl. 50, fig. 2 [= + +Plagioconus elatus +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +]. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +: + +NHMW +1843 + +/0032/0026, +Baden +( +Austria +), illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 3, fig. 1). + + + +Studied material. +Holotype and 2 spec. NHMW A 1612, 4 spec. + + +NHMW +2013 + +/0300/0526, Baden-Sooß ( +Austria +), 1 spec + +. NHMW1869/0001/0423, 1 spec. + + +NHMW +1863 + +/0015/0399, +Forchtenau +( +Austria +), 2 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1868 + +/0001/0382, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 30 +F, 31A1–A3: Baden-Sooß ( +Austria +): SL: +92.7 mm +, MD: +35.7 mm +, +NHMW +2013/ 0300/0526; +Figs 31 +B1–B3: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +76.6 mm +, MD: +32.5 mm +, +NHMW +1868/0001/0382. + + +Revised description. +Large club-shaped shell, up to +94 mm +in height with tall mammillate-cyrtoconoid spire. Earliest spire whorls strongly pointed; spire whorls broad, weakly convex but of bulgy appearance due to the deeply incised suture. Very faint spiral threads on early whorls; weak beads above suture, rarely preserved. Last whorl with broadly rounded shoulder; subsutural flexure deep, strongly curved, strongly asymmetrical. Position of maximum diameter some distance below upper suture; straight sided to weakly constricted in middle part, moderately constricted at base. Fasciole long, twisted and demarcated by deep and broad groove from narrow plait. Siphonal canal long, slightly recurved. Aperture narrow, widening anteriorly. Sculpture consisting of spiral threads on last whorl, strengthening on lower half; spiral threads interrupted by growth lines causing a wavy pattern. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of weak spirals of speckles on last whorl. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. Only two shells are complete, all others lack the siphonal canal; for these species the ratios are: largest specimen: SL: +92.7 mm +, MD: +35.7 mm +, last whorl angle: µ = 23/28°, LW: µ = 2.6/2.4, RD: µ = 0.47/0.52, PMD: µ = 0.91/0.89, RSH: µ = 0.19/0.18. + + + + +FIGURE 30. +Oblique views of selected specimens. +30A. + +Phasmoconus ottiliae +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Szob (Hungary), NHMW 1847/0061/0001. +30B. + +Phasmoconus schroeckingeri +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/0035/0040, holotype. +Fig. 30C. + +Plagioconus +bellissimus + +nov. sp., Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1890/0001/0012b, paratype. +30D. + +Plagioconus +lapugyensis + +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879), Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1870/0033/0006a, syntype. +Fig. 30E. + +Plagioconus + + +hirmetzli +(Kovács & Vicián, 2013) + +, Letkés (Hungary), private collection Anton Breitenberger. +Fig. 30F. + +Plagioconus + + +austriaconoe +(Sacco, 1893) + +, + +Plagioconus + + +austriaconoe +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Baden-Sooß (Austria), NHMW 2013/0300/0526. +Fig. 30G. + +Plagioconus +breitenbergeri + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), private collection Anton Breitenberger. +30H. + +Plagioconus elatus +(Michelotti, 1847), Grinzing (Austria) + +, NHMW 1846/0037/0023. +30I. + +Plagioconus + + +marii +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Baden-Soo (Austria), NHMW 2013/0300/0529. +30J. + +Plagioconus + + +puschi +(Michelotti, 1847) + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1846/0037/0026. +30K. + +Plagioconus + + +extensus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +, Baden-Sooß (Austria), NHMW 1872/0030/0017. +30L. + +Conus + + +s. +l. + + +praelongus +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), 0NHMW 1854/0035/0034a, syntype. +30M. + +Conus + +s.l. + +posticestriatus +Kojumdgieva in Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov, 1960 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/ 0035/0038, holotype. +Fig. 30N. + +Conus + +s.l. + +sturi +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/0035/ 0043a, syntype. +30O. + +Conus + +s.l. + +johannae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1949/0005/0003. +30P. + +Pseudonoduloconus austriacus +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1866/0011/0106, syntype. +30Q. + +Conus + + +s. +l. + + +olivaeformis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania). NHMW 1854/0035/0046, syntype. +30R. + +Conus + +s.l. + +vindobonensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1846/0037/0043a. +30S. + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), private collection Anton Breitenberger. + + + + +FIGURE 31A1–A3. + +Plagioconus + + +austriaconoe +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Baden-Sooß (Austria), NHMW 2013/0300/0526. +31B1–B3. + +Plagioconus + + +austriaconoe +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1868/0001/0382. +31C1–C3. + +Plagioconus +bellissimus + +nov. sp., Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1874/0025/0002a, holotype. +31D1–D2. + +Plagioconus +bellissimus + +nov. sp., Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1874/0025/0002b, paratype. +31E1–E2 +. + +Plagioconus +bellissimus + +nov. sp., Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1890/0001/0012a, paratype. +31F1–F3. + +Plagioconus +bellissimus + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), private collection Anton Breitenberger. +31G1–G5. + +Plagioconus +breitenbergeri + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0041/0001, holotype. +31H1–H2. + +Plagioconus +breitenbergeri + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0041/0002, paratype. + + + + +Discussion. +The specimens display some variability concerning spire height, but the conspicuous club-shaped outline and large size allow this species to be easily separated from other Paratethyan cones shells. + +Plagioconus +austriaconoe + +is reminiscent of + +P. clavatulus +(d’Orbigny, 1852) + +, from the European early and middle Miocene, and is probably closely related (see +Peyrot 1931 +; +Hall 1966 +; +Janssen 1984 +). Both develop convex spires with markedly pointed early spire and have broadly rounded shoulders. A separation is based on the higher spire, the bulgy spire whorls, the more elongate last whorl and the lower position of the maximum diameter of + +P. austriaconoe + +. + +Conus pseudopuschi +Sacco, 1893 + +was based on a single strongly fragmented and slightly deformed specimen from offshore clays of the +Vienna +Basin. The spire is largely destroyed except for parts of the last three whorls. We consider this specimen to represent a + +P. austriaconoe + +with somewhat deeper concavity below the adsutural swelling. Therefore, + +Conus pseudopuschi + +is a subjective junior synonym of + +Plagioconus +austriaconoe + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. + +Plagioconus +austriaconoe + +is a rare species, which was found so far only in offshore clays. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Baden ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin +: Forchtenau ( +Austria +) ( +Sieber 1956 +); +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Grund ( +Austria +); +Pannonian Basin +: Letkés ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Transylvanian Basin +: Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Boettger 1906 +; +Chira & Voia 2001 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA0FFCFFF5FAF57FBF745A5.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA0FFCFFF5FAF57FBF745A5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3c45acfcf46 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA0FFCFFF5FAF57FBF745A5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,340 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus neumayri +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +O, 11C1–C3, 11D1–D2, 11E1–E2, 11F1–F2 + + + + + +[ + +Lithoconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Neumayri + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +Neumayri + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 27 + +, pl. 1, figs 17–18. + + + + + +FIGURE 11A1–A5 +. + +Kalloconus moravicus +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Mikulov-Kienberk (Czech Republic), NHMW 2016/ 0033/0001. +11B1–B3. + +Kalloconus moravicus +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Mikulov-Kienberk (Czech Republic), NHMW 1851/ 0010/0001, syntype. +11C1–C3. + +Kalloconus neumayri +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW A1628. +11D1–D3, 33D. + +Kalloconus neumayri +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania): NHMW 1999z0077/0027, syntype, +11E1–E2. + +Kalloconus neumayri +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1843/0099/0058. +11F1–F2. + +Kalloconus neumayri +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW A1628. +11G1–G3. + +Kalloconus ponderoaustriacus +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/0035/0041, holotype. +11H1–H3. + +Kalloconus ponderoaustriacus +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1855/0045/0358. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1999 + +z0077/0027, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, fig. 17) + +, +3 syntypes + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0056, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), including specimen illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, fig. 18) + +; middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes +and 1 spec. + +NHMW +1843 + +/0099/0058, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +), 29 spec + +. + +NHMW +A1628 +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 11 +C1–C3: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +27.9 mm +, MD: +17.5 mm +, +NHMW +A1628; +Figs 11 +D1–D3, 3D: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): +NHMW +1999z0077/0027, SL: +30.6 mm +, MD: +20.8 mm +, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 17) +; +Figs 11 +E1–E2: Gainfarn ( +Austria +), SL: 30.3, MD: +19.2 mm +, +NHMW +1843/0099/0058; +Figs 11 +F1–F2: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +29.2 mm +, MD: +20.3 mm +, +NHMW +A1628. + + +Revised description. +Moderately small shells with low spire and broad conical last whorl. Early spire pointed; suture of early spire whorls impressed, undulating, resulting in coeloconoid, gradate outline. Later spire whorls weakly convex with deep but narrower suture. Early spire whorls striate; later whorl tops glossy, faintly striate (only visible under high magnification). Last spire whorl distinctly broadening, forming a prominent, rounded shoulder, coinciding with position of maximum diameter. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl stoutly conical to weakly ventricose; aperture moderately narrow, with subparallel margins. Siphonal canal very short, straight; fasciole short, twisted; inner lip broad, short, straight. Surface glossy with few pitted spiral grooves on base demarcating broad spiral cords. Colour pattern consisting of large rectangular blotches roughly axially and spirally arranged. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 10: largest specimen: SL: +36.1 mm +, MD: +23.6 mm +, mean SL: +28.8 mm +(σ = 3.5), mean MD: 18.5 (σ = 2.9), spire angle: µ = 128.1° (σ = 6.2°), last whorl angle: µ = 37.9° (σ = 2.0°), LW: µ = 1.6 (σ = 0.1), RD: µ = 0.71 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.91 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.09 (σ = 0.04). + + + + +Discussion. +The highly characteristic colour pattern is among the most intense in Paratethyan cones under UV light and allows a quick identification in the collection, even in mixed lots. None of the specimens tends to form dots or dashes. Therefore, we reject the synonymization with + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +as proposed by +Hall (1966) +and +Bałuk (1997) +. Moreover, the striae on the early spire whorl become obsolete much earlier and it lacks the nodules along the shoulder of the early spire whorls seen in + +K. berghausi + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +At least the lot NHMW A1628 from Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania) derives from sandy nearshore environments with miliolid and elphidiid foraminifers (based on sedimentfill of the shells). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn ( +Austria +) (NHMW collection), +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA1FFB0FF5FA8E1FB7F4788.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA1FFB0FF5FA8E1FB7F4788.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c3ed1cd9280 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA1FFB0FF5FA8E1FB7F4788.xml @@ -0,0 +1,262 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus letkesensis + +nov. sp. + + + + +Figs 3 +M, 10E1–E3, 10F1–F4, 10G1–G4, 10H1–H3 + + + + + +Monteiroconus tietzei +( +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 +) + +— +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +(partim): 79, figs 92, 94 [non + +Kalloconus tietzei +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + + +Holotype: +Figs 10 +E1–E3: SL: +29.5 mm +, MD: +20.6 mm +, NHMW 2016/0006/0001. + + +Paratype: +Figs 10 +F1–F4: SL: +30.1 mm +, MD: 21.0 mm, NHMW 2016/0006/0002. + + +Additional material: +1 spec. NHMW 2016/0006/0004, 3 spec. private collection Anton Breitenberger: + + +Figs 10 +G1–G4: SL: +40.9 mm +, MD: +23.3 mm +; +Figs 10 +H1–H3: SL: +35.5 mm +, MD: +23.2 mm +, +Fig. 3 +M: SL: +37.4 mm +, MD: +26.6 mm +; all specimens from Letkés, Hungary. + + +Type stratum: +fossil-rich marly sand with coral blocks and andesite boulders of the Sámsonháza Formation ( +Császár 1997 +). + + + + +Type +locality: + +Letkés +at the western part of the +Börzsöny Mts. +( +Hungary +); see + +Kovács +& +Vicián +(2013) + +for a map and description. + + + +Age: +Middle Miocene, early Badenian (= Langhian). + + + + +Etymology: +Referring to the +type +locality Letkés in +Hungary +. + + + + +Description. +Moderately small to medium sized, stout shells with very low to low spire and broad conical last whorl. Early spire weakly coeloconoid with faintly concave and striate whorls; broad, weak nodules along the shoulder of 3rd–5th spire whorl resulting in undulating suture. Later spire whorls narrowly coiled, weakly convex, weakly striate; suture narrow; last spire whorl broad and flat with shallow central broad groove, striate, passing via rounded shoulder into broad conical to faintly ventricose last whorl. Position of maximum diameter in posterior quarter of last whorl. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Siphonal fasciole very weak but well demarcated from short, narrow inner lip. Siphonal canal short, straight. Aperture straight, moderately narrow, slightly broadening towards siphonal canal. Delicate spiral grooves on lower third of last whorl. Very prominent colour pattern in UV light consisting of very densely spaced spirals of thin, delicate dashes covering the entire last whorl. Below the maximum diameter, slightly below mid-whorl and on the base, the dashes area arranged in three darker bands. Broad flammulae appear on spire whorls. + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 6: largest specimen: SL: +40.9 mm +, MD: +26.6 mm +, mean SL: +33.8 mm +(σ = 4.8), mean MD: +22.3 mm +(σ = 2.6), spire angle: µ = 138.5° (σ = 10.1°), last whorl angle: µ = 41.5° (σ = 1.9°), LW: µ = 1.52 (σ = 0.13), RD: µ = 0.73 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.87 (σ = 0.11), RSH: µ = 0.10 (σ = 0.06). + + + + +Discussion. +This species could be easily mistaken for + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +or + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +nov. sp. from which it differs in the constantly striate spire whorls, the faintly ventricose last whorl and especially in the conspicuous spiral colour pattern, which differs completely from the large dots and blotches of + +K. berghausi + +and + +K. hendricksi + +. Therefore, some specimens in the Paratethyan literature might rather represent + +Kalloconus letkesensis + +than + +K. berghausi + +(e.g. Kojumdgieva in +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +, pl. 51, fig. 3). Another morphologically similar species is + +Kalloconus neumayri +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +, which is distinguished easily by its colour pattern consisting of large rectangular blotches. + + +This species was mixed by +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +with + +Kalloconus tietzei +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +. It differs from + +K. tietzei + +in its smaller size, more slender outline, striate spire whorls, shallower subsutural flexure, broader last spire whorl, much weaker siphonal fasciole and the dense spirals of dashes, whereas + +K. tietzei + +shows much coarser and wider-spaced dashes. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The locality Letkés comprises a mixed assemblage of partly reworked taxa ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); the frequent occurrence of corals suggests a shallow marine depositional environment. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Pannonian Basin: +Letkés ( +Hungary +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA1FFB1FF5FAF43FF5647A4.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA1FFB1FF5FAF43FF5647A4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..15ea1a016ed --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA1FFB1FF5FAF43FF5647A4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,377 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus moravicus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +N, 11A1–A5, 11B1–B3 + + + + + +Conus +fusco-cingulatus + +Bronn—Hörnes 1851: 21 (partim), pl. 1, figs 4a–c [non + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +]. [ + +Lithoconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +moravicus + +n. f. +— +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 (nomen nudum). + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +Moravicus + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 29 + +(partim) [nov. nom. pro + +Conus +fusco-cingulatus + +in Hörnes 1851, pl. 1, figs 4a–c]. + + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +moravicus +R. Hoernes et M. Auinger—Švagrovský 1982: 404 + +, pl. 5, fig. 4 [= + +Monteiroconus supracompressus +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +7 syntypes + +NHMW +1851 + +/0010/0001, including specimen illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 1, fig. 4) + +; + +3 syntypes + +NHMW +1851 + +/0020/0001, all +Mikulov-Kienberk +( +Czech Republic +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +(late +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes +and +12 specimens +, + +NHMW +2016 + +/0033/0001, +Mikulov-Kienberk +( +Czech Republic +) + +; + +15 spec. + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0057, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +; + +4 spec. + +NHMW +1848 + +/0003/0004, +Ritzing +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1865 + +/0035/0025, +Szob +( +Hungary +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 11A +1 +–A5: Mikulov-Kienberk ( +Czech Republic +): SL: +40.2 mm +, MD: +26.2 mm +, +NHMW +2016/0033/0001; +Figs 11 +B1–B3: +syntype +, Mikulov-Kienberk ( +Czech Republic +): SL: +47.5 mm +, MD: 32.0 mm, +NHMW +1851/0010/0001, illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 1, fig. 4); +Fig. 3 +N: Mikulov-Kienberk ( +Czech Republic +): SL: +35.2 mm +, MD: +23.1 mm +, +NHMW +2016/0033/0001. + + +Revised description. +Medium sized solid shells with very low conical spire and short, broad conical last whorl. Spire whorls nearly flat to weakly concave in adapical half and slightly convex abapically; early spire whorls distinctly striate, with two striae demarcating impressed suture. Very broad, poorly defined swellings along shoulder of 3rd -6th teleoconch whorl, causing undulating suture. Last two whorls smooth with very irregular suture. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl broad with rounded, prominent shoulder. A weak concavity appears in many specimens slightly below shoulder, resulting in stout, ficoid outline. Last whorl straight-sided or weakly ventricose below concavity; indistinctly constricted at base. Siphonal canal short and wide; fasciole short, moderately swollen, well demarcated from short inner lip; aperture moderately wide with subparallel margins. Densely spaced wavy spiral grooves and cords on base. Colour pattern frequently preserved, consisting of 12–16 thin, continuous spirals separated by broader interspaces. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +13 specimens +: largest specimen: SL: +47.5 mm +, MD: 32.0 mm, mean SL: +39.4 mm +(σ = 4.4), mean MD: 26.2 (σ = 3.3), spire angle: µ = 132.1° (σ = 8.0°); last whorl angle: µ = 37.9° (σ = 1.6°), LW: µ = 1.5 (σ = 0.04), RD: µ = 0.72 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.91 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.08 (σ = 0.03); the large specimen of +70 mm +height, mentioned by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +, is based on a misidentification. + + + + +Discussion. +The colour pattern is highly reminiscent of + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +, which was the reason why Hörnes (1851) mixed both species. The broad conical and often fig-shaped last whorl of + +K. moravicus + +, however, allows a separation of both species (Fig. 12). Nevertheless, the original species concept of +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +was blurred by lumping different species. Especially juvenile shells of + +Monteiroconus supracompressus +(Sacco, 1893) + +were mixed with + +K. moravicus + +in the +type +lots. Similarly, +Švagrovský (1982) +misidentified a + +Monteiroconus supracompressus + +as + +K. moravicus + +(both species are found at the locality described by +Švagrovský 1982 +). The more elongate last whorl of + +M. supracompressus + +and its nearly flat spire, separate both species distinctly. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Typically found in shallow marine, sandy nearshore environments with seagrass. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Niederleis, Gainfarn, Enzesfeld, Steinebrunn, Pötzleinsdorf, Baden, Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +), Mikulov-Kienberk ( +Czech Republic +), Borský Mikuáš ( +Slovakia +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Švagrovský 1982 +); +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin +: Forchtenau ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Oberpullendorf Basin +: Ritzing ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Styrian Basin +: Gamlitz ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Boettger 1906 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA3FFB2FF5FA8E1FA0846A6.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA3FFB2FF5FA8E1FA0846A6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..52bd0123004 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA3FFB2FF5FA8E1FA0846A6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,427 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus hungaricus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +L, 10B1–B3, 10C1–C3, 10D1–D3 + + + + + +[ + +Lithoconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +hungaricus + +n. f. +— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +Hungaricus + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 29 + +(partim), pl. 2, figs 6a–b, [non pl. 4, figs 1a–c]. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +hungaricus +Hoernes & Auinger—Strausz 1962: 146 + +, pl. 67, fig. 14. + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +hungaricus +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 455 + +, pl. 67, fig. 14. + + + +? + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +hungaricus +Hoernes + +et Auinger—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972: 33, pl. 17, fig. 22. + + + +Kalloconus hungaricus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +— + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +: 238, pl. 37, figs 9, 10, pl. 38, fig. 1, pl. 41, fig. 8, pl. 42, fig. 2, pl. 81, fig. 2. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +2 syntypes + +NHMW +1851 + +/0013/0018, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +), including specimen illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 2, fig. 6) + + +, + +1 syntype + +NHMW +1867 + +/0029/0004, +Coşteiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated herein as + +Figs +10 + +B1–B3, designated herein as +lectotype + +. + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes +and 6 spec. +NHMW +A 990; +Grund +( +Austria +), 4 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1870 + +/0037/0002, +Ritzing +( +Austria +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 10 +B1–B3, 3L: Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +), +55.9 mm +, MD: +40.4 mm +, +NHMW +1867/ 0029/0004; +Figs 10 +C1–C3: Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +), SL: +66.2 mm +, MD: +46.1 mm +, +NHMW +1851/0013/0018; +Figs 10 +D1–D2: Bad Vöslau, SL: +65.8 mm +, MD: +43.9 mm +, +NHMW +2010/0004/1578. + + +Revised description. +Moderately large, stout, broadly club-shaped, robust shells. Spire depressed and conical, initial part low coeloconoid; low dome-shaped in large, fully grown specimens. Spire whorls flat to weakly convex, smooth; subsutural flexure of medium depth, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Rounded shoulder, coinciding with position of maximum diameter; last whorl broad, ventricose, not constricted. Aperture wide, distinctly broadening abapically, terminating in a wide, short and straight canal. Inner lip short, broad, strongly twisted, demarcated from weakly swollen fasciole by a shallow groove, causing an angulation at the transition from inner lip to columella. Spiral cords on base. Colour pattern poorly preserved, consisting of numerous densely spaced spiral rows of narrow dashes. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 7: largest specimen: SL: +69.3 mm +, MD: +55.5 mm +, mean SL: 62.0 mm (σ = 5.4), mean MD: +44.2 mm +(σ = 6.0), spire angle: µ = 141.6° (σ = 6.5°), last whorl angle: µ = 43.3° (σ = 2.0°), LW: µ = 1.41 (σ = 0.08), RD: µ = 0.76 (σ = 0.04), PMD: µ = 0.89 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.07 (σ = 0.01). + + +Paleoenvironment. +The sediment infill in the apertures of the specimens from Bad Vöslau and Grund suggests a shallow marine silty-sandy environment. + + + + +Discussion. + +Conus hungaricus + +is a problematic taxon. +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +based their description on specimens, which—in our opinion—represent three different species. Unfortunately, they considered the specimen from Coşteiu de Sus, illustrated by them as pl. 4, fig. 1, as characteristic specimen. This specimen, however, has concave and striate spire whorls and a distinctly angulate shoulder (like a second specimen in the +type +lot). We consider these specimens to represent + +Monteiroconus daciae +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +. The second specimen illustrated by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 2, fig. 6) +and other +syntypes +from the +Vienna +Basin, differ considerably from those specimens in their rounded shoulder and weakly convex, smooth spire whorls. All subsequent authors identified this morphotype as + +Conus hungaricus + +. +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +did not designate a +type +specimen in accordance to our modern understanding and therefore we select the +syntype +from Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +), illustrated herein as +Figs 10 +B1–B3 as +lectotype +of + +Conus hungaricus + +. Due the ambiguous situation, +Bałuk (1997) +synonymized + +Conus daciae + +and + +Conus hungaricus + +. Although subadult + +M. daciae + +are morphologically reminiscent of + +Kalloconus hungaricus + +, it differs from + +M. daciae + +in the ventricose last whorl and the shallower subsutural flexure. Further specimens from Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) treated as + +Conus hungaricus + +by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +, are described herein as + +Kalloconus pseudohungaricus + +. + + +The juvenile specimen from the Badenian of the Bükk Mountains in +Hungary +illustrated by Csepreghy- +Meznerics (1972) +has deep spiral grooves on the base, which would be atypical for + +K. hungaricus + +. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep: +Grund ( +Austria +) ( +Sieber 1949 +); +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin +: Forchtenau ( +Austria +) ( +Sieber 1956 +);? +Bükk Mountains +: Borsodbóta ( +Hungary +) ( +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972 +); +Pannonian Basin System: +Várpalota ( +Hungary +) ( +Strausz 1966 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879; NHMW collection +). + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea. +Serravallian (middle Miocene): Karman Basin ( +Turkey +) ( + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +). The occurrence of this species in the Tortonian of Barcelona, mentioned by Faura I Sans (1908), needs confirmation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA4FFB5FF5FAACCFD9E469C.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA4FFB5FF5FAACCFD9E469C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8b0b168dc1d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA4FFB5FF5FAACCFD9E469C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus gallicus +( +Mayer-Eymar, 1890 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +K, 10A1–A6 + + + + + + +Conus gallicus + +May.-Eym.— + +Mayer-Eymar 1890 +: 295 + +. + + + + + + + +Conus gallicus + +Mayer-Eymar—Mayer-Eymar 1891: 328, pl. 2, fig. 2. +C. +[ +onus +] + +( +Chelyconus +) +gallicus +Mayer-Eymar, 1890 + +— + + +Caze +et al +. 2011 + +: 173 + +, fig. 2J. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +, +ETH +Zurich +( +Swiss Federal Institute +of +Technology +in +Zurich +, +German +: Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule +Zürich +), inventory number S2776 (fide + +Hall +1966 + +); +Larriey-Saucats +, +France +; early +Miocene +, Aquitanian. + + + + +Studied material +. 1 spec. + +NHMW +2016 + +/0036/0001, +Nemeşeşti +( +Romania +). + + + + + +Illustrated +material. + + +Figs +10A + +1 +–A6, 3K: +Nemeşeşti +( +Romania +), SL: +50.1 mm +, MD: +31.9 mm +, + +NHMW +2016 + +/ 0036/0001. + + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized shell; low conical spire with coeloconoid initial part; early spire whorls faintly striate, slightly concave; later whorls weakly convex; suture impressed. Subsutural flexure of medium depth, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Narrow, rounded shoulder, coinciding with position of maximum diameter. Last whorl conical, straight sided with faint constriction at base. Aperture narrow with parallel margins; Siphonal canal short, nearly straight; siphonal fasciole very weak. Few wide-spaced spiral cords on base with weaker cords intercalating. Colour pattern on spire and last whorl consisting of irregular, strongly amalgamating dark blotches and few a light blotches. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +SL: +50.1 mm +, MD: +31.9 mm +, spire angle: 123°, last whorl angle: 37°, LW: 1.57, RD: 0.73, PMD: 0.90, RSH: 0.12. + + + + +Discussion. +This species is characterised by the sloping last spire whorl, the narrow rounded shoulder and the narrow aperture. Nevertheless, the lack of any “extravagant” conchological features might raise doubts about the identification of the middle Miocene Paratethyan shell with an early to middle Miocene species from the northeastern Atlantic. Fortunately, the identification is supported by the unusual colour pattern, which was documented by + +Caze +et al +. (2011) + +also for an early Miocene specimen from the +Aquitaine +Basin. + + + + + +Kalloconus tietzei +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +is broader, has a stronger siphonal fasciole, a wider anterior part of the aperture and differs in its colour pattern of spiral dashes. Some specimens of + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +, as illustrated by +Davoli (1972) +, develop a comparable outline but differ in their wider last whorl aside from the punctate colour pattern of + +K. berghausi + +. The occurrence of this species in the Pliocene of the Mediterranean Sea will need confirmation. The specimens from Asti ( +Italy +) described by +Hall (1966) +agree in shape but no information on colour patterns is available. Other Pliocene specimens described as + +Conus gallicus + +by +Muñiz-Solís (1999) +and +Paganelli (2014) +are rather slender and have less sloping shoulders. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Transylvanian Basin: +Nemeşeşti ( +Romania +) (own data). + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and northeastern Atlantic. +early Miocene (Aquitanian, Burdigalian): +Aquitaine Basin: +Larriey, Saucats, Merignac ( +Mayer-Eymar 1890 +); +Turin Hills +: Termofourà (Italy) ( +Hall 1966 +);? Pliocene: +Po Basin +: Asti (Italy) ( +Hall 1966 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA5FFB5FF5FADEFFF564319.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA5FFB5FF5FADEFFF564319.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..46172767416 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA5FFB5FF5FADEFFF564319.xml @@ -0,0 +1,247 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus cacellensis + +(Pereira da +Costa, 1866 +) + + + + +Figs 3 +J, +8I +1–I4 + + + + + + +Conus Cacellensis +Costa—Pereira + +da + +Costa 1866 +: 15 + +, pl. 3, figs 4–6. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +Cacellensis +da Costa—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 31 + + +, pl. 4, fig. 3. + + + + + +Conus cacellensis + +(P. da + +Costa +, 1866 + +)—33, + +Gonçalves & Monteiro 2012 +: 32 + +, 33, unnumbered figure, bottom left. + + + + + + + +Type +material: + +Syntypes +illustrated in Pereira da + +Costa +(1866: pl. 3, figs 4–6) + +; late +Miocene +, +Tortonian +; +Cacella +, +Portugal +. + + + + +Studied material: +1 spec. + +NHMW +1855 + +/0043/0002 +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + + +Illustrated material. + +Figs + +8 + + +I1–I4, 3J: +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +): SL: +70.3 mm +, MD: +43.6 mm +, + +NHMW +1855 + +/ 0043/0002. + + + +Revised description. +Moderately large shell with low spire; spire whorls weakly convex, smooth except for faint striae in the adapical thirds; suture impressed. Last whorl with additional faint spiral cords just above shoulder of last whorl. Subsutural flexure very shallow, weakly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Broadly rounded shoulder; last whorl elongate conical with weak constriction on base. No spiral cords on base. Siphonal fasciole weakly swollen, short; siphonal canal moderately wide, short. Colour pattern consisting of numerous delicate, continuous spiral stripes under UV light and about 10 narrow, whitish spiral bands in normal light (not clearly visible under UV light). + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +SL: +70.3 mm +, MD: +43.6 mm +, spire angle: 130°, last whorl angle: 30°, LW: 1.61, RD: 0.69, PMD: 0.93, RSH: 0.10. + + + + +Discussion. +Only a single specimen is available, which agrees well with the specimens illustrated by Pereira da + +Costa +(1866) + +and +Gonçalves & Monteiro (2012) +in shape, the shallow subsutural flexure, the colour pattern and the faint concavity of the last whorl. This species is reminiscent of + +Kalloconus betulinoides +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +, from the late Miocene and Pliocene of the Proto-Mediterranean Sea, which differs in its even more elongate shell, the longer siphonal canal, the channelled suture, the striate early spire whorls and the prominent spiral cords on the base (based on NHMW collection). + + +Paleoenvironment. +Unknown. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus. + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +northeastern Atlantic. + +Tortonian: Cacela Basin, +Portugal +(Pereira da + +Costa +1866 + +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA7FFB4FF5FAE0CFDB04356.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA7FFB4FF5FAE0CFDB04356.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7ae78b085b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA7FFB4FF5FAE0CFDB04356.xml @@ -0,0 +1,556 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +nov. sp. + + + + +Figs 3 +H, +3I +, 8F1–F5, 8G1–G3, 8H + + + + + +Conus Berghausi +Micht. + +—Hörnes 1851: 19, pl. 1, fig. 3d [non + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +subraristriatus +da Costa—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 23 + + +(partim), pl. 1, fig. 21 (only) [non fig. 20 = + +Varioconus eschewegi + +(Pereira da + +Costa +, 1866 + +), non + +Lautoconus subraristriatus + +(Pereira da + +Costa +, 1866 + +)]. + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +berghausi +Michelotti 1847 + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 215 + +, pl. 51, figs 3a–b [non + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Cleobula +) +berghausi vaceki +Hoernes & Auinger—Strausz 1962: 147 + +, pl. 71, figs 10–14 [non + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +]. + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +berghausi +Michelotti 1847 + +—Bohn-Havas 1973: 1124, 11, pl. 9, fig. 10 (pl. 7, figs 3 is an unidentifiable internal mould) [non + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +berghausi +Michelotti, 1847 + +— + +Bałuk 1997 +: 58 + +(partim), pl. 21, figs 1–2 [non + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +]. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Cleobula +) +berghausi vaceki +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 464 + +, pl. 71, figs 10–14 [non + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +]. + + + + + + + +Holotype +: + + +Figs +8 + +F1–F5: +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), SL: 25.2, MD: +16.9 mm +, + +NHMW +1870 + +/0033/0005a. + + + + + +Paratype +: + + +Figs +8 + +G1–G3: +Pöls +( +Austria +), SL: +21.2 mm +, MD: 13.0 mm + +NHMW +1861 + +/0001/0226. + + + + + + + +Additional +paratypes +: + +Fig. 8 +H: +Weitendorf +( +Austria +), SL: +24.6 mm +, MD: +16.4 mm +, private collection, +Anton Breitenberger +(this specimen shows its natural coloration due to heating by basalt flows); +Fig. 3 +H: +Pöls +( +Austria +), SL: +21.1 mm +, MD: +13.4 mm + +NHMW +1861 + +/0001/0226; + +Fig. + +3 + + +I: +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), SL: +21.4 mm +, MD: +13.6 mm + +, NHMW 1870/0033/0005c; 1 spec. + + +NHMW +1849 + +/0023/0003, +Baden +( +Austria +), illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 1, fig. 3d); 31 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1870 + +/0033/0005, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), including specimen illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, fig. 21) + +; 24 spec + +. NHMW 1861/0001/0226, 12 spec. + + +NHMW +2002 + +/0181, +Weitendorf +( +Austria +). + + + + + +Type stratum: +Badenian marly-clayey deposits with thin interlayers of sand and corallinacean limestones. + + + + +Type +locality: + +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + +Age: +Middle Miocene, early Badenian (= Langhian). + + + + +Etymology. +In honour of Jonathan R. Hendricks, a specialist for Neogene cone snails, in recognition of his contributions to the knowledge of the group. + + + + +Description. +Small shells; spire very low conical with pointed, coeloconoid initial part. Early spire whorls weakly concave, distinctly striate with impressed, sometimes narrowly canaliculated suture. Within 3rd -5th teleoconch whorl, shoulder of spire whorls marked by irregular swellings and blunt beads, resulting in undulating suture; last spire whorl weakly convex, smooth, distinctly broadening. Position of maximum diameter coinciding with shoulder or slightly below. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl conical to faintly ventricose, weakly constricted. Aperture narrow; slightly widening towards short and weakly reflected siphonal canal; siphonal fasciole narrow, rather indistinct; inner lip short, slightly twisted. Deep spiral grooves demarcate broad spiral cords on base. Shell surface glossy. Colour pattern consisting of about 13–16 regularly spaced rows of spirally arranged, subquadratic dots. Rows usually consisting of dots of more or less equal size; rarely single rows are formed by smaller dots. + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 18: largest specimen: SL: +26.8 mm +, MD: +17.2 mm +, mean SL: +22.6 mm +(σ = 1.7), mean MD: +14.4 mm +(σ = 1.1), spire angle: µ = 128.3° (σ = 10.6°), last whorl angle: µ =39.9° (σ = 1.4°), LW: µ = 1.6 (σ = 0.07), RD: µ = 0.70 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.90 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.09 (σ = 0.04). + + + + +Discussion. + +Kalloconus berghausi + +is an eye-catching species due to its frequently preserved colour pattern of spirally arranged dots. Typical specimens are medium-sized, squat and club-shaped with prominent shoulder (e.g. + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +). Along with this morphology, a distinctly smaller, less club-shaped morphotype is usually identified as + +Conus berghausi + +in collections and the literature, mainly due to its very similar colour pattern. A Principal Component Analysis of the shell measurements and ratios of both morphotypes shows a very good separation of both groups ( +Fig. 9 +). Both types co-occur also in the late Miocene of Montegibbio ( +Davoli 1972 +) and are represented in NHMW collections from Modena and Tortona (Italy). The conspicuous spire sculpture strongly suggests a close relationship between both types. Aside from size and outline, typical + +berghausi + +differs from the smaller species in the less pointed early spire, the much stronger spiral cords on the spire whorls, the broader, less defined shoulder nodules, the shallower suture and the wider suture. In addition, both groups differ also in the colour pattern, which is less variable in the + +K. hendricksi + +, consisting of regularly spaced rows of regularly sized dots. A further difference is the row of dots on the last spire whorl of + +K. hendricksi + +whereas + +K. berghausi + +develops irregular, thin flammulae. + + +The lack of intermediate specimens and the very constant size in the collection lots does not support an interpretation of the + +K. hendricksi + +as juveniles of the larger + +K. berghausi + +. Therefore, the smaller species seems to represent a distinct but overlooked Miocene species. Nevertheless, the fact that both morphotypes frequently cooccur at some Paratethyan and proto-Mediterranean sections is striking and we cannot exclude that we are dealing with ontogenetic stages or sexual dimorphism as discussed for + +Conus centurio +Born, 1778 + +for which shells of females are reported to be larger and more obtuse ( +Percharde 1984 +). + + +Despite the numerous names introduced by +Sacco (1893a) +, we were not able to find any available name for this small + +berghausi + +-like species. + +Conus broteri +Pereira + +da +Costa, 1866 +, from the Tortonian of Portugal, may partly correspond to this species (e.g. Pereira da +Costa 1866 +, pl. 49, fig. 26), but other syntypes of + +C. broteri + +differ clearly in their very squat shape with flat spire (e.g. Pereira da +Costa 1866 +, pl. 49, fig. 30; +Gonçalves & Monteiro 2012 +, p. 33, unnumbered fig.). + + +Paleoenvironment. +Shallow marine near shore settings. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin + +: Baden ( +Austria +) (Hörnes 1851); +Styrian Basin: +Pöls, Weitendorf ( +Austria +) (own data); +Carpathian Foredeep: +Korytnica ( +Poland +) ( +Bałuk 1997 +); +Pannonian Basin System: +Várpalota, Mecsek Mts. ( +Hungary +) ( +Strausz 1966 +; Bohn-Havas 1973); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Dacian Basin +: Târnene, Staropatica, Radomirci ( +Bulgaria +) ( +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +). + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and north eastern Atlantic. +? Tortonian: Cacela Basin, Portugal (Pereira da +Costa 1866 +); Po Basin, Italy ( +Davoli 1972 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA9FFB6FF5FA8E1FAC8474D.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA9FFB6FF5FA8E1FAC8474D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..69415547dda --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFA9FFB6FF5FA8E1FAC8474D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,896 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +G1–G2, 8A1–A3, 8B1–B3, 8C, 8D1–D3, 8E, + + + + + + +Conus Berghausi + +mihi, + +Michelotti 1847 +: 342 + +, pl. 13, figs 9–9’. + + + + +Conus Berghausi +Micht. + +—Hörnes 1851: 19, pl. 1, figs 3a–c [non fig 3d = + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +nov. sp.]. + + + +[ + +Dendroconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Vaceki + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + +C. +[ +onus +] + +Vaceki + +— +Hoernes 1878b +: 206 (nomen nudum). + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +Vaceki + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 22 + +[nov. nom. pro + +C. berghausi +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 1, fig. 3]. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +subraristriatus +da Costa—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 23 + + +(partim), pl. 1, fig. 22 [non fig. 20 = + +Lautoconus eschewegi + +(Pereira da +Costa, 1866 +), non + +Lautoconus subraristriatus + +(Pereira da +Costa, 1866 +)]. + + + +C +.[ +onus +] +Auingeri +— +De Gregorio 1885 +: 378 [nov. nom. pro + +Conus subraristriatus +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +pl. 1, fig. 22]. + + + +Conus ventricosus +Bronn—Friedberg 1911: 60 + +, text-fig. 14 [non +Gmelin, 1791 +, non +Bronn, 1831 +]. + + + +Conus Berghausi +Micht. + +var. + +Vaceki + +R. Hoern. i Auing.—Friedberg 1911: 62, pl. 3, fig. 5. + + + + + +Conus Berghausi +Micht. + +—Friedberg 1928: 566, text-fig. 80. + + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +berghausi +Michelotti 1847 + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 151 + +, pl. 38, figs 8a–b. + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +berghausi +Michelotti—Atanacković 1969: 214 + +, pl. 12, figs 17–17b. + + + +Conus +( +Cleobula +) +berghausi vaceki +Hoernes et Auinger—Nicorici 1972: 70 + +, pl. 17, figs 3–4. + + +? + +Conus +( +Cleobula +) +berghausi planocylindrica +Sacco—Kókay 1996: 457 + +, pl. 4, fig. 2. + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +berghausi +Michelotti, 1847 + +— + +Bałuk 1997 +: 58 + +(partim), pl. 21, figs 3–4. + + + + + +Conus +( +Cleobula +) +berghausi vaceki +Hoernes & Auinger—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 4, figs 5a–b. + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +berghausi +Michelotti, 1847 + +—Harzhauser 2002: 113, pl.10, figs 4–6. + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +berghausi +Michelotti, 1847 + +— + +Miku 2003 +: 308 + +, pl. 10, fig. 30. + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +berghausi +Michelotti, 1847 + +— + +Miku 2009 +: 36 + +, pl. 12, fig. 164. + + + + + +Dendroconus berghausi +(Michelotti) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 66 + +, figs 2, 38–40, 42. + + + + + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +— + + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +: 236 + +, pl. 37, figs 6–8, pl. 42, fig. 1; pl. 81, fig. 1. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +berghausi +Michelotti 1847 + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 215 + +, pl. 51, figs 3a–b [non fig 3d = + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +nov. sp.]. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Cleobula +) +berghausi vaceki +Hoernes & Auinger—Strausz 1962: 147 + +, pl. 71, figs 10–14 [non fig 3d = + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +nov. sp.]. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Cleobula +) +berghausi vaceki +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 464 + +, pl. 71, figs 10–14 [non fig 3d = + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +nov. sp.]. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +berghausi +Michelotti 1847 + +—Bohn-Havas 1973: 1124, 11, pl. 9, fig. 10 [non fig 3d = + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +nov. sp.]. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +The +specimen illustrated by + +Michelotti +(1847) + +is lost. +Therefore +, + +Hall +(1966) + +proposed the specimen illustrated by + +Sacco +(1893a, pl. 1, fig. 16) + +from the late +Miocene +( +Tortonian +) of +Stazzano +in +Italy +as +neotype +(stored in the +Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali +, +Torino +, catalogue number BS.039.40.006). + + + + +The +type +locality of + +Conus vaceki +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +(considered to be junior synonym of + +C. berghausi + +) is +Niederkreuzstetten +( +Austria +) + +; + +the +type +stratum is +lower Miocene +coastal sand of the Korneuburg Formation. + + + + +Studied material. +9 spec. + +NHMW +1849 + +/0004/0017, +Niederkreuzstetten +( +Austria +), including specimen illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 1, figs 3a–c) and +Harzhauser +(2002, pl. 10, fig. 5); 5 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1864 + +/0001/0498, +Niederkreuzstetten +( +Austria +) + +; 1 spec. private collection, Anton Breitenberger, Weitendorf (Austria); + +3 spec. + +NHMW +1856 + +/0050/0413, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 8A +1 +–A3: Niederkreuzstetten ( +Austria +), SL: 39.1, MD: +28.9 mm +, +NHMW +1849/ 0004/0017, specimen illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 1, figs 3a–c), +syntype +of + +Conus vaceki +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +; +Figs 8 +B1–B3: Niederkreuzstetten ( +Austria +), SL: 32.2, MD: +21.4 mm +, +NHMW +1864/0001/0498; +Fig. 8 +C: Niederkreuzstetten ( +Austria +), SL: 31.4, MD: +21.7 mm +, +NHMW +1849/0004/0017; +Figs 8 +D1–D3: Weitendorf ( +Austria +), SL: +34.5 mm +, MD: +23.4 mm +, private collection, Anton Breitenberger (this specimen shows its natural coloration due to heating by basalt flows); +Figs. 8 +E, 3G1–G2: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: 42.0 mm, MD: +29.8 mm +, +NHMW +1856/0050/0413. + + +Revised description +. Medium-sized, stout club-shaped shells; spire low and conical, weakly coeloconoid. Early spire whorls slightly concave with strong spiral cords. Suture impressed, emphasized by two raised cords, resulting in a narrowly channelled suture in some specimens. Spiral cords become obsolete within 3rd–4th spire whorls, which develop broad, irregular swellings along shoulder causing undulations of the shoulder. Subsequent spire whorls smooth, becoming successively more convex. Last whorl distinctly broadening with prominent, rounded shoulder coinciding with maximum diameter. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl short, conical, not constricted. Aperture moderately wide; slightly widening towards short and straight canal; siphonal fasciole indistinct, short; inner lip short, slightly twisted. Deep spiral grooves demarcate broad spiral cords on base; grooves stop abruptly within lower third of whorl and do not become obsolete adapically. Colour pattern highly variable, consisting of about 13–20 rows of spirally arranged, often subquadratic dots. Size of dots highly variable; small dots tend to be densely spaced, whilst large dots are widely spaced; often two rows of dots form close-spaced pairs separated by wider interspaces from the next pair. + + + + +FIGURE 8A1–A3. + +Kalloconus berghausi +(Michelotti, 1847) + +, Niederkreuzstetten (Austria), NHMW 1849/0004/0017. +8B1–B3. + +Kalloconus berghausi +(Michelotti, 1847) + +, Niederkreuzstetten (Austria), NHMW 1864/0001/0498. +8C. + +Kalloconus berghausi +(Michelotti, 1847) + +, Niederkreuzstetten (Austria),, NHMW 1849/0004/0017. +8D1–D3. + +Kalloconus berghausi +(Michelotti, 1847) + +, Weitendorf (Austria), private collection, Anton Breitenberger. +8E. + +Kalloconus berghausi +(Michelotti, 1847) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania). NHMW 1856/0050/0413. +8F1–F5 +. + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +nov. sp, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1870/0033/ 0005a, holotype. +8G1–G3. + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +nov. sp, Pöls (Austria), NHMW 1861/0001/0226, paratype. +8H +. + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +nov. sp, Weitendorf (Austria), private collection, Anton Breitenberger. +8I1–I4. + +Kalloconus cacellensis + +(Pereira da Costa, 1866), Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1855/0043/0002. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 14: largest specimen: SL: +44 mm +, MD: +31.1 mm +, mean SL: 35.0 mm (σ = 5.4), mean MD: +24.3 mm +(σ = 4.2), spire angle: µ = 128.0° (σ = 10.2°), last whorl angle: µ = 40.1° (σ = 1.1°), LW: µ = 1.4 (σ = 0.06), RD: µ = 0.75 (σ = 0.04), PMD: µ = 0.87 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.08 (σ = 0.04). + + + + +Discussion. +Despite the numerous papers dealing with this species, no author so far has described the conspicuous sculpture of the early spire whorls with broad shoulder nodules and prominent striae. Similarly, the concave tops of early spire whorls have not been mentioned before. A comparison with specimens from the Tortonian of Modena and Tortona, showed the same features and fully support the identification of the Paratethyan specimens. This species was placed in + +Kalloconus +da +Motta, 1991 + +by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +and + +Landau +et al +. (2013) + +. The concave tops do not contradict this assignment as the +type +species + +Kalloconus pulcher + +([ +Lightfoot, 1786 +]) and also + +K. byssinus +(Röding, 1798) + +—the second extant species included by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +in the genus—have also slightly concave tops. Clear deviation from the diagnosis is the presence of very prominent spiral cords on early spire whorls and the broad nodules. Consequently, either the diagnosis of + +Kalloconus + +has to be emended or the Miocene species has to be placed in another genus. Provisionally, we follow +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +and tentatively treat the species as + +Kalloconus + +. + + +The colouration of the specimens from Weitendorf (Styria, Austria) seems to reflect the original pattern and several other mollusc species from this site reveal similarly well preserved patterns (NHMW collection). Although we do not know the chemical mechanism, it is likely that heating by a synsedimentary basalt flow ( +Krainer 1987 +) was responsible for this preservation. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Karpatian (early Miocene): +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Niederkreuzstetten ( +Austria +) (Harzhauser 2002); Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin + +: Steinebrunn ( +Austria +), Mikulov-Kienberk ( +Czech Republic +) (Hörnes 1851; +Sieber 1958b +); +Styrian Basin: +Pöls, Weitendorf ( +Austria +) (own data); +Carpathian Foredeep: +Korytnica, Białogon ( +Poland +) (Friedberg 1911; +Bałuk 1997 +); +Pannonian Basin System: +Pécsszabolcs, Letkés, Mátraverebély, Sámsonháza, Várpalota, Bánd, Diósd, Hidas, Márkháza, Zebegény, +Budapest +: Rákos, Illés street ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +southern Pannonian Basin: +Milijevići ( +Bosnia and Herzegovina +) ( +Atanacković 1969 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Şimleu Basin +: Tusa ( +Romania +) ( +Nicorici 1972 +); +Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: +Valea Strinii, Valea Bela Reca, Valea Calvei, Valea Satului ( +Romania +); +Krka Basin +: Orehovica ( +Slovenia +) ( +Miku 2009 +). + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +north eastern Atlantic + +. + + +Burdigalian: Colli Torinesi, +Italy +( +Sacco 1893a +; +Hall 1966 +); Langhian and Serravallian: +Aquitaine +Basin + +, + +France +( +Peyrot 1931 +); Langhian: +Loire +Basin ( +Glibert 1952a +); Serravallian + +: + +Karaman +Basin, +Turkey +( + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +); Tortonian: Cacela Basin + +, + +Portugal +(Pereira da + +Costa +1866 + +); Po Basin + +, Italy ( +Sacco 1893a +; +Davoli 1972 +, 1990; +Ruggieri & Davoli 1984 +; +Caprotti 2011 +). An occurrence from the Pliocene of Italy mentioned by +Sacco (1893a) +needs confirmation and is most probably incorrect. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFAAFFBBFF5FACFDFA0046B3.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFAAFFBBFF5FACFDFA0046B3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8de75122e33 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFAAFFBBFF5FACFDFA0046B3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + +Genus + +Kalloconus +da +Motta, 1991 + + + + + + + + + +Type +species: + + +Conus pulcher + +[ +Lightfoot, 1786 +], by original designation. +Recent +, +West Africa. + + + +Note. +According to +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +, the genus + +Kalloconus +da +Motta, 1991 + +is characterised by large to very large and obconic shells, with a broad, rounded shoulder. The spire whorls can be smooth, striate with the sculpture disappearing on later whorls, or persisting as crowded, weak spirals. The protoconch is multispiral. The subsutural flexure is moderately deep to deep in larger specimens, and shallower in smaller specimens. The shell is ornamented with spots and dashes in spiral rows. In their molecular phylogeny, + +Puillandre +et al +. (2014a) + +recognised this group as being monophyletic, albeit at subgeneric level, and a sister group to + +Lautoconus + +. Both of these genera today have a West African and European distribution. However, whereas +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +included only two extant species within the genus, + +C. pulcher + +[ +Lightfoot, 1786 +] and + +C. byssinus +(Röding, 1798) + +, the molecular phylogeny by + +Puillandre +et al. +(2014a) + +included six further species: + +C. ateralbus +Kiener, 1850 + +, + +C. genuanus +Linnaeus, 1758 + +, + +C. trochulus +Reeve, 1844 + +, + +C. venulatus +Hwass in +Bruguière, 1792 + +, + +C. atlanticoselvagem +Afonso & Tenorio, 2004 + +and + +Conus pseudonivifer +Monteiro, Tenorio & Poppe, 2004 + +. Although the molecular phylogenetics have led to a wider generic concept, the generic description of the shell remains unchanged. + + +Based on Paratethyan material here reviewed, we can add that + +Kalloconus + +species are small to very large, squat to moderately elongate. The spire is always low to very low; spire whorls are convex and usually smooth except for occasional striae on early spire whorls. The proto-Mediterranean + +Kalloconus betulinoides +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +is a fossil species with striate spire whorls like the extant type species + +Kalloconus pulcher + +([ +Lightfoot], 1786 +). Spiral sculpture on last whorl very reduced. The depth of the subsutural flexures in all our fossil species is highly variable, ranging from very shallow to deep; they are usually moderately curved and moderately asymmetrical. The last whorl is of medium to wide width. As with the living species, the colour pattern in most of the fossil representatives is also composed of spiral rows of spots and dashes; only few species develop continuous spirals. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFABFFBBFF5FAF5CFE1F455D.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFABFFBBFF5FAF5CFE1F455D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b96c8f3d493 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFABFFBBFF5FAF5CFE1F455D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conilithes sceptophorus +( +Boettger, 1887 +) + + + + + + +Figs +5 + +I1–I3 + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +sceptophorus + +n. sp. +— + +Boettger 1887 +: 7 + +, pl. 2, figs 6–8. + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +sceptophorus +Bttgr. + +— + +Boettger 1906 +: 2 + +. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype +, inventory number +SMF + +XII.2245 + +a coll. +O. Boettger +ex M. v. +Kimakowicz +1883, +Senckenberg Museum +, +Frankfurt +( +Germany +) + +; + +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +); middle Miocene, Badenian (Langhian). + + + +Studied material. +Syntype + + + +Illustrated material. + +Figs + +5 + + +I1–I3: +Syntype +, SL: +13.5 mm +, MD: +6.6 mm +, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +); picture taken by +Sigrid Hof +, provided by +Ronald Janssen +, section +Malacology +, +Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut Frankfurt +/ +Main. + + + +Revised description. +Small biconical shell with moderately high scalariform spire. Early spire whorls probably tuberculate; later spire whorls smooth, carinate, weakly concave. Subsutural flexure deep, nearly symmetrical. Last whorl with angulated shoulder; position of maximum diameter slightly below shoulder; faintly ventricose, weakly constricted at base. Siphonal canal short, rather narrow. Few deeply incised spiral grooves on base. Colour pattern consisting of axially arranged zig-zag stripes (according to +Boettger 1887 +; the illustrated +syntype +shows only vague traces of this pattern). + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +Syntype +: SL: +13.5 mm +, MD: +6.6 mm +, spire angle: µ = 68°, last whorl angle: 44°, LW: 2.05, RD: 0.70, PMD: 0.89, RSH: 0.30. + + + + +Discussion. +Boettger (1906) +emphasised that + +Conilithes brezinae +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +did not occur at Coşteiu de Sus and united all “ + +brezinae + +-like” specimens from that locality in his + +Conus sceptophorus + +. In the collections of the Natural History Museum +Vienna +, however, numerous specimens from Coşteiu de Sus undoubtedly represent + +C. brezinae +. + +In contrast, not a single of these specimens agrees with the +syntypes +of + +Conilithes sceptophorus + +in the stout biconical outline and the zig-zag colour pattern. Whilst one might argue that Boettger’s +syntypes +are just stout specimens of + +C. brezinae + +, the zig-zag colour pattern supports a separation because + +C. brezinae + +develops thin spiral lines. For the same reason we reject a synonymization with the Pliocene Italian + +Conilithes canaliculatus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +, as proposed by +Kovács & Balász (2016) +, because this species has densely spaced spirals (see +Panganelli 2014 +). + + +Paleoenvironment. +Unknown. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +), Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Boettger 1887 +, +1906 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFADFFBAFF5FAA34FA1447B7.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFADFFBAFF5FAA34FA1447B7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..39e33c0d8af --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFADFFBAFF5FAA34FA1447B7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1168 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conilithes exaltatus +( +Eichwald, 1830 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +D, 6B1–B3, 6C1–C3, 6D1–D3, 6E1–E3, 6F1–F2 + + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] + +exaltatus + +m.— + +Eichwald 1830 +: 222 + +. + + + + + + + +Conus antidiluvianus +Bruguière—Dubois de + +Montpéreux 1831 +: 23 + + +, pl. 1, fig. 1 [ +non + +Conus antidiluvianus +Bruguière, 1792 + +). + + + + + +Conus Dujardini +Desh. + +— + +Deshayes 1845 +: 158 + +. + + + + +Conus Dujardini +Desh. + +—Hörnes 1851: 40 (partim), pl. 5, figs 3, 5–7 [non pl. 5, figs 8a–f += + +Conilithes brezinae +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + + +Conus subacutangulus +d’Orb. + +—d’Orbigny 1852: 58, nr. 1003 (nov nom. pro + +Conus antidiluvianus +in Dubois de + +Montpéreux 1831 +: 23 + + +, pl. 1, fig. 1]. + + + + +Conus exaltatus + +— +Eichwald 1852 +: plate captions, pl. 9, figs 3a–b. + + + + + +Con. +exaltatus + +m.— +Eichwald 1853 +: 208. + + + + + +Conus dujardini +Desh. var. +taurostriolata +Sacco—Moisescu 1955b: 261 + +. + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +Dujardini +Desh. + +— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 35 + +. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +dujardini +Desh. + +— + +Boettger 1906 +: 2 + +. + + + + +Conus +cf. +avellana +Lam. + +—Friedberg 1911: 56 (partim), pl. 2, fig. 20. + + + +Conus Dujardini +Desh. + +—Friedberg 1911: 47, pl. 2, fig. 11. + + + +Conus Dujardini +Desh. + + +var. +exaltatus +Eichw. + +—Friedberg 1911: 51, pl. 2, fig. 12. + + + + +Conus +( +Conuspira +) [ +sic +] +dujardini +Deshayes, 1831 + +— + +Moisescu 1955a +: 159 + +, pl. 14, figs 15–18. + + + + + +Conus +( +Conuspira +) +antideluvianus +Bruguière var. +buiturica + + +var. nov +. + +— + +Moisescu 1955a +: 162 + +, pl. 14, figs 7–8. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes 1845 + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 209 + +, pl. 49, fig. 4. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes—Atanacković 1963: 77 + +, pl. 15, figs 3–3a. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 451 + +, pl. 67, figs 2–5. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes—Bałuk 1970: 119 + +, pl. 13, figs 15–16. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Desh. + +— + + +Stancu +et al +. 1971 + +: 126 + +, pl. 8, fig. 9. + + + + + +Conus dujardini +Deshayes 1845 + +— + +Eremija 1971 +: 79 + +, pl. 5, fig. 9. + + + + +Conus +( +Conospira +) +dujardini astensis + +Sacco—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972: 34, pl. 17, figs 12–13. + + + + + +Conus +( +Conospira +) +dujardini brezinae +Hoernes + +& Auinger—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972: 34, pl. 17, figs 15–17. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes 1845 + +— + +Nicorici & Sagatovici 1973 +: 175 + +, pl. 27, figs 10–12. + + + + +Conus +( +Conospira +) +dujardini +Deshayes 1845 + +—Bohn-Havas 1973: 1066, pl. 8, figs 1–2. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 178 + +, pl. 39, figs 18–19. + + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +exaltatus +Eichwald, 1853 + +— + +Bałuk 1997 +: 57 + +, pl. 19, figs 5–8. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes—Schultz 1998: 72 + +, pl. 29, fig. 11. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +— + +Chira & Voia 2001 +: 153 + +, pl. 1, fig. 5. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +—Harzhauser 2002: 112, pl. 9, fig. 12. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +— + + +Caze +et al +. 2010 + +: 32 + +, fig. 5N. + + + + + +Conilithes dujardini +( +Deshayes, 1845 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 92 + +, figs 157–159. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntypes +described by +Eichwald (1830) +from Bilozirka (= +Bialazurka +, +Bialozurka +) and Shushkivtsi (= +Shukowze +) about +50 km +NE of +Ternopil +( +Ukraine +) (see map in + +Dubois de +Montpéreux + +1831). The specimens were most probably stored in the Zoological Museum of +St. Petersburg +( +Russia +) but could not be identified on request; middle Miocene, Badenian ( +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material. +33 spec. + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0037, +Baden +( +Austria +) including specimen illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 3d), 32 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0036, +Baden +( +Austria +) including specimens illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, figs 3a, 3b, 3c), 12 spec + +. NHMW 1866/0011/0182, 12 spec. NHMW 2007z0078/007032, 24 spec. + + +NHMW +2013 + +/0078/052-2013/0078/0523, +Baden +( +Austria +); 22 spec + +. NHMW 1862/0001/0310,> 100 spec. + + + + +NHMW +2010 + +/0004/ +1343-2010 +/0004/1345, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +) + +; 5 spec. NHMW 1973/1615/0214; 19 spec. + +NHMW +A 1616, Baden-Sooß ( +Austria +) including specimen illustrated in + +Schultz +(1998, pl. 29, fig. 11) + +; 1 spec + +. NHMW 2013/0479/1603, 1 spec. + + +NHMW +1970 + +/1396/1231, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +; + +26 spec. + +NHMW +1867 + +/0019/0013, +Coşteiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +; + +59 spec. + +NHMW +1870 + +/0033/0012, 16 +NHMW +A 1617, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 6 +B1–B3: Möllersdorf (Austria): SL: +18.6 mm +, MD: +7.2 mm +, + + +NHMW +2016 + +/0002/ 0001; + +Figs +6 + +C1–C3: +Baden +( +Austria +): SL: +48.5 mm +, MD: +17.9 mm + +, + + +NHMW +1866 + +/0011/0182; + +Figs +6 + +D1–D3: +Baden +( +Austria +): SL: +44.9 mm +, MD: +17.6 mm + +, + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0036, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 3), + +Figs +6 + +E1–E3: +Baden +( +Austria +): SL: +48.6 mm +, MD: +19.6 mm + +, + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0036; + +Figs +6 + +F1–F2: SL: +26.2 mm +, MD: +11.3 mm + +, + +MNHN +A31836, +Coşteiu de Sus +( +Romania +) (pic: +P. Loubry +, +MNHN +) + +; + +3D: Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +), SL: +27.7 mm +, MD: +11.6 mm +, + +NHMW +1862 + +/0001/0310. + + + +Revised description. +Moderately small to medium-sized elongate shells with very high, scalariform spire and long last whorl. Protoconch high and conical, consisting of 3 whorls. Spire whorls faintly striate with sharp carina slightly below mid-whorl; sutural ramp flat to weakly concave. Tubercles on carina present only on first 3–4 spire whorls. Several deeply incised, punctate spiral grooves below carina on spire whorls and last whorl. Subsutural flexure deep, strongly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl strongly angular at shoulder with maximum diameter at carina; constricted at base with long, slightly widening and weakly recurved canal. Punctate spiral grooves on lower half of last whorl, extending over the adapical half in occasional specimens. Last whorl of subadult shells often completely covered by grooves. Colour pattern showing irregular blotches on the spire and shoulder and spirally arranged subquadratic dots on the cords on the last whorl, amalgamating to irregular blotches. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +26 adult +specimens: largest specimen: SL: +48.6 mm +, MD: +19.6 mm +, mean SL: +40.8 mm +(σ = 4.9), mean MD: +16.4 mm +(σ = 0.4), spire angle: µ = 59.7° (σ = 4.9°), last whorl angle: µ = 30.9° (σ = 1.5°), LW: µ = 2.5 (σ = 0.15), RD: µ = 0.56 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.9 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.29 (σ = 0.04). + + + + +Discussion. +The status of + +Conus dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +and + +Conus exaltatus +Eichwald, 1830 + +is controversially discussed in the literature (e.g. +Bałuk 1997 +; +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +). + +Conus dujardini + +was introduced by +Deshayes (1845) +without clearly stating type material or type area because he referred to material from Ukraine, Austria and France. From the context, it is obvious, that he had French specimens at hand. In any case he referred to the illustration of Dubois de +Montpéreux (1831, pl. 1, fig. 1) +, which was later designated the lectotype of + +Conus dujardini + +by +Glibert (1952b) +. The specimen of Dubois de Montpéreux originates from one of three villages in the area of Bilozirka (= Bialazurka, Bialozurka), +50 km +ENE of Ternopil (=Tarnopol) in Ukraine (see map in Dubois de +Montpéreux 1831 +). The specimens described by +Eichwald (1830 +, +1853 +) as + +Conus exaltatus + +were collected at the same localities. As already discussed by +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +, both specimens seem to be conspecific, which is also supported by the PCA; based on shell measurements, both specimens clearly plot with the specimens described herein as + +Conilithes exaltatus + +( +Fig. 7B +). In a PCA plot based on shell-ratios ( +Fig. 7A +), both specimens plot close to + +C. brezinae + +, together with other stout morphologies of + +C. exaltatus + +(see remarks paragraph for + +C. brezinae + +for the separating features). Hence, it is highly likely that + +C. exaltatus + +and + +C. dujardini + +are conspecific, making + +C. dujardini + +a subjective junior synonym. The name + +C. dujardini + +has been extensively used in the literature, however it cannot be favoured over + +C. exaltatus + +as Friedberg (1911) used the name as a variety of + +C. dujardini + +, and +Bałuk (1997) +figured a specimen under this name. D’Orbigny (1852) introduced + +Conus subacutangulus + +as new name for the specimen, which was illustrated by Dubois de +Montpéreux (1831, pl. 1, fig. 1) +erroneously as + +Conus antidiluvianus +. +Conus subacutangulus + +is thus a subjective junior synonym of + +C. exaltatus +Eichwald, 1830 + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The majority of specimens in the NHMW collection derive from offshore clays suggesting inner to outer shelf environments as preferred habitat. + + + + + + +Conilithes brocchii + +in the Paratethys. + +Hörnes (1851, pl. 5, figs. 5–7) illustrated three Austrian shells as variation of + +C. dujardini + +(= + +exaltatus + +), which are characterized by a low spire and concave sutural ramp, which accentuate the carina as a slightly raised ridge. Later, Friedberg (1911, text-fig. 9) and +Csepreghy-Meznerics (1972, pl. 17, fig. 11) +documented comparable specimens from +Ukraine +and +Hungary +. +Hall (1966) +placed fig. 7 of Hörnes (1851) in + +Conus brocchii +Bronn, 1828 + +, which was followed by other authors (e.g. +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972 +; + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +; +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +). A comparison with Pliocene specimens of + +Conilithes brocchii + +from Italian localities (NHMW collection) revealed several differences. Aside from being smaller, the Paratethyan shells have a regularly conical, less ventricose last whorl and the spiral grooves on the base are punctate, deep and well defined, whereas in + +C. brocchii + +they are smooth and rather shallow without sharp margins. Also the formation of the characteristic sutural rim is not strictly homologous. It is a raised margin in + +C. brocchii + +, as opposed to a carina close to the suture in the Paratethyan specimen. Moreover, the “ + +brocchii + +”-morphs are extremely rare in the Paratethyan material. Consequently, we consider these shells to represent aberrant specimens of + +Conilithes exaltatus + +(or C. + +brezinae + +). + +Conilithes brocchii +sensu +Kovács & Vicián, 2013 + +from the Badenian of Letkés ( +Hungary +) has a slightly ventricose outline and rounded shoulder and is not conspecific with + +C. brocchii + +and + +C. exaltatus + +. + + + + +FIGURE 7A–B. +PCA based on shell measurements of specimens of 3 + +Conilithes + +species (NHMW collection, Table 1). +A +: shell ratios, +B +: shell measurements. A separation of C. + +antidiluvianus +, +C. exaltatus + +and + +C. brezinae + +is evident in both analyses. The measurements for the lectotype of + +C. dujardini +and + +the syntype of + +C. exaltatus + +were taken from the illustrations in Eichwald (1952) and Dubois de Montpéreux (1831). SL = shell length, AH = apertural height, HMD: height of maximum diameter, SA = spire angle, LWA = angle of the last whorl, LW = length width ratio, RD = relative diameter, RSH = relative height of spire. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Karpatian (early Miocene): Korneuburg Basin: Kleinebersdorf (Harzhauser 2002); Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Enzesfeld, Steinebrunn, Bad Vöslau, Baden-Sooß, Möllersdorf, Pfaffstätten ( +Austria +), Sedlec ( +Czech Republic +); +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Grund, Windpassing ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Schultz 1998 +); +Carpathian Foredeep +: Węglinek, Łychów, Korytnica ( +Poland +); Hołubica, Biłka, Jasinów, Bilozirka, Shushkivtsi ( +Ukraine +) (Dubois de +Montpéreux 1831 +; +Bałuk 1997 +); +Southern Carpathians +: Dubova ( +Romania +); +Bükk Mountains +: Borsodbóta ( +Hungary +); +Pannonian Basin +: Bánd, Diósd, Herend, Hetvehely, Hidas, Kovácsvágás, Letkés, Márkháza, Mátraverebély, Nógrádszakál, Sámsonháza, Szob, Szokolya, Várpalota, Zebegény, +Budapest +: Rákos, Illés street ( +Hungary +) ( +Strausz 1966 +; Csepreghy- +Meznerics 1972 +; +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Banja Luka Basin +: Jazovac ( +Bosnia and Herzegovina +) (Atanacković 1963); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus, Bujtur ( +Romania +); +Zârand Basin +: Minişul de Sus ( +Romania +); +Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: +Valea Bela Reca ( +Romania +) ( +Moisescu 1955a +; + +Stancu +et al +. 1971 + +; +Chira & Voia 2001 +; + +Caze +et al +. 2010 + +); +Dacian Basin: +Opanec ( +Bulgaria +) ( +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +). + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and northeastern Atlantic. +This species is clearly also present in the Miocene of the Mediterranean area but the confusion with + +C. brezinae + +makes a critical evaluation of the literature data difficult. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFAEFFBCFF5FAB81FCF5409F.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFAEFFBCFF5FAB81FCF5409F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2baa25dd872 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFAEFFBCFF5FAB81FCF5409F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conilithes eichwaldi + +nov. nom. + + + + +Figs 5 +B1–B2, 5C1–C2 + + + + +C. +[ +onus +] + +exiguus + +m.— +Eichwald 1830 +: 222 [non + +Phasmoconus exiguus +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +]. + +Conus exiguus + +— +Eichwald 1852 +: plate captions, pl. 9, figs 4a–b. + +Con. +exiguus + +m.— +Eichwald 1853 +: 208. + + + + +Syntypes +: + +Two +potential +syntypes +are stored in the +Zoological Museum +of +St. Petersburg +( +Russia +); inventory number + +ZISP +62085 + +. + + + + + + + +Type +locality. + +Eichwald (1830) +mentioned Bilozirka (= Bialazurka, Bialozurka) and Shushkivtsi (= Shukowze) as +type +localities but on the label of the available specimens the locality is given as Zalisce. Therefore, it is unclear if these specimens are +syntypes +. +In +any case, all localities are located within a small area about +50 km +NE of +Ternopil +( +Ukraine +). + + + +Age: +Middle Miocene, Badenian (Langhian or Serravallian). + + + + +Etymology. +Referring to the Russian palaeontologist Karl Eduard von Eichwald ( +1795–1876 +), who was a pioneer in geosciences in the Carpathian Foredeep. + + + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 5 +B1–B2, 5C1–C2: 2 spec. + +ZISP +62085 + +, +Zalisce +( +Ukraine +). + + + + + +Description. +Small strombiform shells with high spire; teleoconch consisting of at least 9 whorls; spire gradate to scalariform with beaded carina placed mid-whorl or close to the lower suture; sutural ramp faintly striate. Shoulder broadly rounded, weakly subangulate; position of maximum diameter below shoulder; shoulder striate; subsutural flexure unknown. Last whorl stout, concave below maximum diameter, constricted; lower third of last whorl with sharp spiral cords; siphonal fasciole indistinct. Aperture largely missing in both specimens. + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +2 specimens +are available: SL: +15 mm +, MD: +7 mm +, spire angle: 60°, last whorl angle: 33°; SL: +11 mm +, MD: +6 mm +, spire angle: 70°, last whorl angle: 40° + + + + +Discussion. +This species is unique among Paratethyan cones for its high spire and rounded shoulder, resulting in a strombiform profile. It is reminiscent of + +Plagioconus burdigalensis +( +Mayer, 1858 +) + +, from the Burdigalian of the +Aquitaine +Basin, which also has a gradate to scalariform spire with carina and a last whorl with a broadly rounded, weakly subangulate shoulder and prominent spiral cords on the base. It differs from + +C. eichwaldi + +in its larger size and elongate last whorl. Therefore, it is unlikely that the Polish species is just a juvenile + +Plagioconus burdigalensis + +. + + +The high spire, ventricose last whorl and striate sutural ramp would also fit in + +Lautoconus + +but the tuberculate and scalariform spire outline, are rather untypical for this genus (although + +Lautoconus desidiosus +(Adams, 1853) + +may form a scalariform spire). Therefore, we tentatively place this species in + +Conilithes + +. + + +Eichwald (1830) +described this small and rare species as + +Conus exiguus + +. This name was already preoccupied by the Recent + +Conus exiguus +Lamarck, 1810 + +from +New Caledonia +. Therefore, we propose + +Conilithes eichwaldi + +as replacement name. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Unknown; other specimens from the localities mentioned by Eichwald (1839, 1853) are typical nearshore taxa. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Carpathian Foredeep +: Zalisce, Bilozirka (= Bialazurka, Bialozurka) and Shushkivtsi (= Shukowze) ( +Ukraine +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB0FFBFFF5FAC6AFC0942CF.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB0FFBFFF5FAC6AFC0942CF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ad3d2f1e554 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB0FFBFFF5FAC6AFC0942CF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1042 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conilithes brezinae +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +F, 5D1–D3, 5E1–E3, 5F1–F3, 5G1–G3, 5H1 + + + + + +Conus Dujardini +Desh. + +—Hörnes 1851: 40 ( +partim +), pl. 5, figs 8a–f [ +non + +Conus dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +]. + + + +[ + +Leptoconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Brezinae + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +Brezinae + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 36 + +. + + + + +Conus Brezinae +R. Hoern. + +i Auing.—Friedberg 1911: 51, pl. 2, figs 13–14. + + + +Conus +( +Conospira +) +dujardini +Desh. + +—Strausz 1954: 113, pl. 7, fig. 144. + + + +Conus +( +Conospira +) +dujardini brezinae + +H. et Au.—Strausz 1954: 113, pl. 4, fig. 80. + + + +Conus +( +Conuspira +) +brezinae +R. Hörnes + +und +Auinger, 1879 +—Moisescu 1955: 161, pl. 14, figs 9, 12–14. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +var. +brezinae + +( +Hoernes und Auinger, 1879 +)—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 209 + +, pl. 49, fig. 7. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini brezinae +Hoernes & Auinger—Strausz 1962: 151 + +, pl. 22, fig. 16, pl. 43, figs 3–5, pl. 62, figs 8–9. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini brezinae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 452 + +, pl. 22, fig. 16, pl. 43, figs 3–5, pl. 62, figs 8–9. + + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes 1845 + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 151 + +, pl. 38, figs 6a–7 [non + +Conus dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Conospira +) +dujardini brezinae +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +—Bohn-Havas 1973: 1067, pl. 8, fig. 6. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes 1845 + +— + +Krach 1981 +: 75 + +(partim), pl. 21, figs 10, 14, 20, 23 [non + +Conus dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +]. + + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini brezinae +R. +Hoernes et M. Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Švagrovský 1981 +: 154 + +, pl. 48, fig. 8. + + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes 1845 + +— + +Švagrovský 1982 +: 404 + +, pl. 5, fig. 5. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini brezinae +Hoernes & Auinger—Atanacković 1985: 179 + +, pl. 40, figs 1–2. + + + + +Conus dujardini brezinae +Hoernes et Auinger—Ionesi & + +Nicorici 1994 +: 62 + + +, pl. 5, figs. 13–15. + + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +— + +Bałuk 1997 +: 55 + +, pl. 19, figs 1–4 [non + +Conus dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +brezinae +Hoernes & Auinger—Schultz 1998: 72 + +, pl. 29, fig. 10. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +— + +Mikuž 2009 +: 35 + +, pl. 12, figs 159–161 [non + +Conus dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +]. + + + + + +Conilithes canaliculatus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 91 + +, figs 152–156 [non + +Conus canaliculatus +Brocchi, 1814 + +]. + + + + + +Conilithes dujardini +( +Deshayes, 1845 +) + +— + + +Janssen +et al +. 2014 + +: 87 + +, fig. 18 [non + +Conus dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +]. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +brezinae +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 151 + +, pl. 38, figs 5a–b [= unidentified but not + +C. brezinae + +]. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Conospira +) +brezinae +Hoernes + +et Auinger—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972: 33, pl. 17, figs 15–17 [= + +Conilithes exaltatus +( +Eichwald, 1830 +) + +]. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1999 + +z0077/0023a, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 8a) + +; + +syntype + +NHMW +1999 + +z0077/0023b, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 8b) + +; + +syntype + +NHMW +1999 + +z0077/0023c, illustrated +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 8c) + +; + +syntype + +NHMW +1999 + +z0077/0023d, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 8d) + +; + +syntype + +NHMW +1999 + +z0077/0023e, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 8e), all +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +(late +Langhian +). + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes and 37 spec. NHMW 1846/0037/0040, 25 spec. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0039, +Gainfarn +or +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +) + +; 12 spec. NHMW 1853/0010/0008, 9 spec. + +NHMW +A 1614, +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +), including specimen illustrated in + +Schultz +(1998 pl. 29, fig. 10) + +; 2 spec + +. NHMW 1997z0178/1848, 3 spec. NHMW 1985/0083/0159a,>100 spec. + + +NHM +2013 + +/0479/ +1583-1602 +, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +; 10 spec. NHMW A451, 29 spec. + + +NHMW +1860 + +/0001/0076, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +) + +; + +2 spec. + +NHMW +2012 + +/0213/0104, +Pfaffstätten +( +Austria +) + +; + +11 spec. +NHMW +A994, +Guntersdorf +( +Austria +) + +; + +16 spec. +NHMW +A 995, +Grund +( +Austria +) + +; + +24 spec. + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/ 0 0 54, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 5 +D1–D3: Steinebrunn (Austria), SL: +37.9 mm +, MD: +15.9 mm +, + +syntype + +NHMW +1999 + +z0077/0023a, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 8a); + +Figs +5 + +E1–E3: +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), SL: +36.9 mm +, MD: +14.5 mm + +, + +syntype + +NHMW +1999 + +z0077/0023b, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 8b); + +Figs +5 + +F1–F3: +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), SL: +35.1 mm +, MD: +14.1 mm + +, + +syntype + +NHMW +1999 + +z0077/0023c, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 8c); + +Figs +5 + +G1–G3: +Gainfarn +or +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +): SL: +37.3 mm +, MD: +17.8 mm + +, + + +NHMW +1846 + +/ 0037/0039; +Fig. 5 +H1: +Gainfarn +or +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +) + +; + +SL: +36.2 mm +, MD: +16.1 mm +, + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0039; +Fig. 3 +F: +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), SL: +26.6 mm +, MD: +12.2 mm + +, + +syntype + +NHMW +1999 + +z0077/0023e, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 8e). + + + +Revised description. +Moderately small to medium sized, biconical shells, consisting of 10–12 teleoconch whorls. Protoconch high, conical and multispiral. Very high conical spire; early spire whorls with weakly tuberculate angulation just above suture; nodes become obsolete on 3rd to 4th spire whorl grading into a prominent carina, which successively migrates towards the lower suture abapically. Sutural ramp flat to slightly concave with prominent, raised growth lines. Subsutural flexure deep, strongly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Faint spiral threads appear on the sutural ramp of the early spire whorls in a few specimens. Last whorl slightly allometric with wider and less steep sutural ramp; weakly ventricose with slight constriction at base; siphonal canal very short and moderately wide. Aperture broadening slightly abapically, with thin, prosocyrt outer lip. Surface smooth, except for deep, broad spiral grooves on base, confined to the lower quarter of last whorl. Colour pattern in UV light consisting of irregularly spaced thin spiral lines on last whorl intercalated by 2–3 spirals of delicate dots. These stripes appear on the sutural ramp parallel to the subsutural flexure. Beads on spire coincide with short prosocyrt dots. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 25: largest specimen: SL: +37.9 mm +, MD: +17.8 mm +, mean SL: +32.8 mm +(σ = 2.9), mean MD: 14.3 (σ = 1.5), spire angle: µ = 58.4° (σ = 5.2°), last whorl angle: µ = 32.7° (σ = 2.4°), LW: µ = 2.3 (σ = 0.13), RD: µ = 0.63 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.9 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.31 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +There is considerable confusion about the taxonomic status of + +Conus exaltatus +Eichwald, 1830 + +, + +Conus dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +and + +Conus brezinae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +and in the literature all combinations of synonymizations can be found. The validity of + +C. brezinae + +as distinct species was especially doubted by many authors (e.g. +Bałuk 1997 +; + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +; +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +). After a re-examination of the +type +material we reject this decision. A principal components analysis (PCA) of the shell ratios ( +Fig. 7A +) and measurements ( +Fig. 7B +) reveals a very clear separation of + +Conilithes brezinae + +from + +C. exaltatus +. + +Despite some variability in slenderness and spire height, + +C. brezinae + +is characterized by its marked shoulder and somewhat broader sutural ramp of the last whorl, the absence of striae or nodes on late spire whorls and the spiral grooves confined to the base. + +Conilithes brezinae + +further differs from + +C. exaltatus + +in the lower position of the carina, which is also less sharp, the lower height of the spire whorls, the shorter last whorl, which lacks a pronounced basal constriction, and the lack of the punctate spiral grooves. + + +With respect to this re-definition, the Serravallian specimens from the Turkish +Karaman +Basin, described by us ( + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +) as + +Conilithes dujardini + +[which we consider to be a subjective junior synonym of + +Conilithes exaltatus +( +Eichwald, 1830 +) + +, see below], should be treated as + +C. brezinae + +. +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +proposed to synonymize + +Conilithes brezinae + +with the Pliocene + +C. canaliculatus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +. We do not accept this conclusion because + +C. canaliculatus + +has a more ventricose last whorl, its maximum diameter is below the shoulder, the sutural ramp of the last whorl is narrower and the spiral grooves cover a larger part of the base (see +Malatesta 1974 +; +Pinna & Spezia 1978 +; +Chirli 1997 +). + + +Paleoenvironment. +The occurrences in the +Vienna +Basin represent shallow water settings with sea grass meadows (e.g. Gainfarn; + +Zuschin +et al +. 2007 + +). This ecological preference is an additional argument for a separation from + +C. exaltatus + +, which is typically found in offshore clays. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Enzesfeld, Steinebrunn, Grinzing, Pötzleinsdorf, Bad Vöslau, Niederleis ( +Austria +), Mikulov, Kienberk, Hrušovany, Sedlec ( +Czech Republic +), Devínska Nová Ves ( +Slovakia +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Sieber 1958b +; +Švagrovský 1981 +); +Alpine- Carpathian Foredeep +: Grund, Windpassing ( +Austria +), Lysice, ( +Czech Republic +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Sieber 1947 +, +1949 +); Korytnica, Babice, Błonie, Hołubica, Podhorce, Zukowce, Biłka, +Tarnopol +(Friedberg 1911; +Bałuk 1997 +); +Oberpullendorf Basin +: Ritzing ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: +Sieber 1956 +); +Bükk Mountains +: Borsodbóta ( +Hungary +); +Pannonian Basin +: Várpalota, Balaton, Diósd, Hont, Letkés, Mátraverebély, Pécsszabolcs, Szob, +Budapest +: Illés street Szob, Hidas, ( +Hungary +) (Csepreghy-Meznerics 1954; +Strausz 1966 +; +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Styrian Basin +: Pöls ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +); +Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: +Valea Bela Reca ( +Romania +); + +Buzău +Basin + +: Crivineni, Valea Muscel ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; Hinkulo 1968; +Ionesi & Nicorici 1994 +); +Banja Luka Basin +: Jazovac ( +Bosnia and Herzegovina +) ( +Atanacković 1985 +); +Krka Basin +: Dolenja +Brezovica +( +Slovenia +) ( +Mikuž 2009 +). + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and north eastern Atlantic. +This species is clearly also present in the Mediterranean area (e.g. Serravallian, Karman Basin, +Turkey +, + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +) but the confusion with + +C. exaltatus + +makes a critical evaluation of the literature data difficult. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB2FFA1FF5FAEE3FBD842A2.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB2FFA1FF5FAEE3FBD842A2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d3e77cabf68 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB2FFA1FF5FAEE3FBD842A2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,622 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conilithes antidiluvianus +( +Bruguière, 1792 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +C, 5J1–J3, 5K1, 6A1–A3. + + + + + +Conus antediluvianus +Brug. + +—Hörnes 1851: 38, pl. 5, figs 2a–e. + + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +antediluvianus +Bruguière, 1792 + +—Kojumdgieva in +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 209, pl. 49, fig. 3. + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +antediluvianus +Bruguière, 1792 + +— +Strausz 1966 +: 451, pl. 16, fig. 10., pl. 17, fig. 1. + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +antediluvianus +Bruguière—Atanacković 1969: 215 + +, pl. 12, figs 14–15. + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +antediluvianus + +Bruguière—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972: 34, pl. 17, fig. 14. + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +antediluvianus +Bruguière—Steininger 1973: 447 + +, pl. 9, fig. 4 (strongly compressed specimen). + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +antediluvianus +Bruguière—Schultz 1998: 72 + +, pl. 29, fig. 9. + + + + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +antediluvianus +Bruguiere—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 1, figs 6a–b. + + + + +Conolithus + +antidiluvianus +( +Bruguière, 1792 +) + +—Harzhauser +et al +. 2011: 217, fig. 4.5. + +Conilithes antidiluvianus +( +Bruguière, 1792 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 89 + +, fig. 149. + + + + +non + +Conus antidiluvianus +Bruguière—Dubois de + +Montpéreux 1831 +: 23 + + +, pl. 1, fig. 1 [= + +Conilithes exaltatus +( +Eichwald, 1830 +) + +]. non + +Conus +( +Conuspira +) +antideluvianus +Bruguière var. +buiturica + + +var. nov +. + +— + +Moisescu 1955a +: 162 + +, pl. 14, figs 7–8 [= + +Conilithes exaltatus +( +Eichwald, 1830 +) + +]. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +antediluvianus anomalus + +n. spp.— + +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972 +: 34 + +, pl. 17, figs 9–10 (nomen nudum) [= + +Conilithes exaltatus +( +Eichwald, 1830 +) + +]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Neotype +: collection of +Museo Civico di Storia Naturale +( +Milano +), registration number +MSNM +i 28027 +Badagnano +, +Rio +dei +Carbonari +( +Italy +), designated by + +Janssen +et al +. (2014) + +; Pliocene. + + + + +Studied material. +3 spec. +NHMW +A1615, +Windpassing +( +Austria +); 5 spec + +. NHMW 1973/1615/0300, 4 spec. NHMW 1989/0089/0058, 14 spec. NHMW 2013/0078/0524, 4 spec. + + +NHMW +1869 + +/0001/0161, +Baden +( +Austria +), including illustrated specimens of +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, figs 2a–e); 4 spec + +. NHMW1997z0178/1615, 5 spec. NHMW 1872/0030/0019, 13 spec. + + +NHMW +2013 + +/0300/0524, Baden-Sooß ( +Austria +); 11 spec + +. NHMW 1855/0045/ 0 860, 30 spec. NHMW 2010/0004/1338, 3 spec. NHMW 1970/1396/1225, 4 spec. NHMW 1997z0178/1199, 15 spec. + + +NHMW +2010 + +/0004/1338, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +); 10 spec + +. + + +NHMW +2012 + +/0229/0223, +Traiskirchen +( +Austria +); 4 spec + +. + + +NHMW +2013 + +/0479/1604, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +); 9 spec + +. NHMW 1997z0178/1590, 20 NHMW spec. + + +NHMW +1869 + +/0001/0247, +Möllersdorf +( +Austria +), including specimen illustrated in + +Schultz +(1998, pl. 29, fig. 9) + +. + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 5 +J1–J3: Baden ( +Austria +): SL: +56.3 mm +, MD: +20.5 mm +, +NHMW +1869/0001/0161, illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 5, fig. 2); +Fig. 5 +K1: Möllersdorf ( +Austria +): SL: +66.9 mm +, MD: +23.7 mm +, +NHMW +1869/0001/0247; +Figs 6A +1 +–A3: Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +): SL: +61.6 mm +, MD: 23.0 mm, +NHMW +2010/0004/1338; +Fig. 3 +C: Möllersdorf ( +Austria +): SL: +25.6 mm +, MD: +9.1 mm +, +NHMW +1869/0001/0247. + + + + +Description. +Medium sized to moderately large, elongate shells. Protoconch high and conical comprising 3.5 smooth, moderately convex whorls with delicate spiral thread at upper suture; depressed, slightly sunken +nucleus +. First teleoconch whorl with indistinct angulation passing into a carina with blurred nodes on the first 2 spire whorls. Teleoconch consisting of 9–11 whorls; spire moderately high; gradate to scalariform with distinctly beaded carina placed below mid-whorl. Maximum diameter at carina or slightly below. Sutural ramp flat to slightly concave, devoid of spiral sculpture, bearing densely spaced, raised growth lines. Two to four spiral threads below carina may intersect the slightly axially elongated beads. The beads are very prominent and regular on early spire whorls and may become subobsolete on the last two teleoconch whorls. Last whorl elongate conical, weakly constricted at base; siphonal canal long, slightly twisted. Outer, lip simple, straight, prosocyrt; columella straight, columella callus not thickened, restricted to narrow glossy margin. Deep spiral grooves on lower third of last whorl; apical part of last whorl glossy and faintly striate in some specimens. + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +17 adult +specimens: largest specimen: SL: +81.9 mm +, MD: +30.1 mm +, mean SL: +59.2 mm +(σ = 2.4), mean MD: +21.8 mm +(σ = 4.6), spire angle: µ = 61.4° (σ = 7.0°), last whorl angle: µ = 29.4° (σ = 1.4°), LW: µ = 2.69 (σ = 0.2), RD: µ = 0.52 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.88 (σ = 0.05), RSH: µ = 0.27 (σ = 0.04). + + + + +Discussion. +The complex taxonomic history of this species was discussed in great detail by + +Janssen +et al +. (2014) + +, who proposed a neotype from the Pliocene of Badagnano (Italy). Still, however, it remains to be proven if all the Miocene and Pliocene specimens listed as + +C. antidiluvianus + +are conspecific. The adult shells of Pliocene Mediterranean specimens range around +69.7 mm +(n = 14, σ = 10.8, NHMW collection) and are distinctly larger than those from the middle Miocene Paratethys. A further difference is the regularly beaded sculpture of the carina on the earliest teleoconch whorls in + +C. antidiluvianus + +from the Pliocene of Italy and Sicily, whereas the majority of Paratethyan specimens develop a carina with indistinct and more irregular nodes. The protoconch of Miocene North Sea specimens develop 5.5 whorls ( + +Janssen +et al +. 2014 + +), whereas the Pliocene Italian ones have 3.5 whorls (own data and +Muñiz-Solís 1999 +). Similarly, the few Paratethyan Miocene specimens with preserved protoconch develop only 3.5 protoconch whorls. This may indicate that that the North Sea specimens represent a closely related but distinct species. A statistical analysis of the shell ratios (LW, RD, PMD, RSH) of Pliocene Mediterranean and Miocene Paratethyan specimens, however, does not support a clear separation of both groups. Moreover, establishing a new (chrono-sub)species name for the Paratethyan specimens is not advisable given the large number of available names introduced by +Sacco (1893a) +for Miocene specimens from Italy. Therefore, we refrain from separating the Miocene specimens as a distinct taxon. + + +Two subspecies names are found in Paratethyan literature: +Moisescu (1955a) +introduced + +Conus antidiluvianus buiturica + +for an incomplete specimen from Bujtur in +Romania +. This specimen is clearly unrelated to + +Conilithes antidiluvianus + +and might rather represent a stout + +C. exaltatus +( +Eichwald, 1830 +) + +, which lacks the anterior canal. + +Conus antediluvianus + +[sic] +anomalus +was proposed by +Csepreghy-Meznerics (1972) +for a single fragment from the Bükk Mountains in +Hungary +, without description. Therefore, + +Conus antidiluvianus anomalus + +is a nomen nudum. The specimen is most probably an aberrant + +C. exaltatus + +with a high spire. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The species is mainly found in offshore clays suggesting middle shelf to upper bathyal settings (e.g. Harzhauser +et al +. 2011). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Ottnangian (early Miocene): +North Alpine Foreland Basin: +Ottnang-Schanze ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes 1875 +; +Steininger 1973 +); Karpatian (early Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Cerova ( +Slovakia +) (Harzhauser +et al +. 2011); Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Bad Vöslau, Baden, Baden-Sooß, Möllersdorf, Niederleis ( +Austria +), Hrušovany, Rudice ( +Czech Republic +); +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Grund, Windpassing ( +Austria +), Lysice, Jaroměřice nad Rokytnou ( +Czech Republic +); +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin +: Forchtenau ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879; own data +); +Pannonian Basin +: Balaton, Borsodbóta, Csermely, Csokvaomány, Hidas, Letkés ( +Hungary +) ( +Strausz 1966 +; +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972 +; +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +southern Pannonian Basin +: Miljevići ( +Bosnia and Herzegovina +) ( +Atanacković 1969 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Chira & Voia 2001; own data +); +Dacian Basin: +Staropatica, Opanec ( +Bulgaria +) ( +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +). + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and north eastern Atlantic. + +Conilithes antidiluvianus +( +Bruguière, 1792 +) + +sensu stricto +occurs in the Tortonian of Italy (Sant'Agata Fossili, Stazzano, Montegibbio) ( +Sacco 1893a +; +Davoli 1972 +) and becomes very common at Pliocene localities in Italy ( +Hall 1966 +; +Davoli 1972 +; + +Janssen +et al +. 2014 + +). Further Pliocene occurrences are mentioned from southern France (Biot), the Hatay Basin in Turkey, Sicily and Syria ( +Erünal-Erentöz 1958 +; + +Janssen +et al +. 2014 + +) (see +Robba 1968 +for further occurrences). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB4FFA5FF5FA8E1FB0C46EC.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB4FFA5FF5FA8E1FB0C46EC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..873245d26ba --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB4FFA5FF5FA8E1FB0C46EC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,548 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conilithes allioni +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + + + + + +Figs 5A +1 +–A3 + + + + + +Conus Allioni + +mihi—Michelotti 1847: 338, pl. 17, fig. 17. + + + +Conus oblitus + +mihi—Michelotti 1847: 340, pl. 14, figs 2–2a. + + + +[ + +Conus + +] + +Leptoconus Allionii + +[sic] (Micht.)— + +Sacco 1893a +: 32 + +, pl. 4, fig. 6. + + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] +L. +[ +eptoconus +] + +Allionii + +[sic] + +var. +conicospirata +Sacc. + +— +Sacco 1893a +: 33, pl. 4, fig. 8. [ + +Conus + +] +L. +[ +eptoconus +] + +Allionii + +[sic] + +var. +perconicospirata +Sacc. + +— +Sacco 1893a +: 33, pl. 4, fig. 9. [ + +Conus + +] +L. +[ +eptoconus +] + +Allionii + +[sic] + +var. +discors +(Micht.) + +— +Sacco 1893a +: 34, pl. 4, fig. 10. [ + +Conus + +] +L. +[ +eptoconus +] + +Allionii + +[sic] + +var. +pupoidespira +Sacc. + +— +Sacco 1893a +: 34, pl. 4, fig. 11. [ + +Conus + +] +L. +[ +eptoconus +] + +Allionii + +[sic] + +var. +perpupoidespira +Sacc. + +— +Sacco 1893a +: 34, pl. 4, fig. 12. [ + +Conus + +] +L. +[ +eptoconus +] + +Allionii + +[sic] + +var. +oblita +(Micht.) + +— +Sacco 1893a +: 34, pl. 4, fig. 13. [ + +Conus + +] +L. +[ +eptoconus +] + +Allionii + +[sic] + +var. +perfuniculata +Sacc. + +— +Sacco 1893a +: 35, pl. 4, fig. 14. + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +Raulini + +nov. sp.— +Peyrot 1931 +: 118, nr. 1185, pl. 2, figs 19–20. + + + +Conus brocchii +Bronn, 1828 + +— +Hall 1966 +: 140 (partim), pl. 23, fig. 12 [non + +Conilithes brocchii +(Bronn, 1828) + +].? + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) +dujardini +Deshayes, 1845 + +— +Steininger 1973 +: 446, pl. 9, fig. 6. + + + +Leptoconus allionii + +[sic] ( +Michelotti, 1847 +)—Ferrero-Mortara +et al +. 1984: 106, pl. 17, figs 5a–b. [ + +Leptoconus allionii + +] + +var. +perfuniculata +Sacco, 1893 + +– Ferrero-Mortara +et al +. 1984: 106, pl. 17, fig. 2. + +Conus +( +Conolithus +) + +sp.—Harzhauser 2002: 113, pl. 9, figs 13–14. + + + + + + +Conus brochii + +[sic] Bronn, 1828— + +Zunino & Pavia 2009 +: 365 + +, pl. 2, fig.1 [non + +Conilithes brocchii +(Bronn, 1828) + +]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype +or +holotype +illustrated by +Michelotti (1847, pl. 17, fig. 17) +, Turin Hills, +Italy +; the specimen might have been stored in the collections of the +Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra +, +Sapienza Università di Roma +, but parts of the Michelotti collection were destroyed during +World War II +( +Manni 2005 +); early Miocene, Burdigalian. + + + + +Studied material. +6 spec. + +NHMW +1976 + +/1785/0044, +Kleinebersdorf +( +Austria +) + +; + +8 spec. + +NHMW +1976 + +/1785/ 0 0 47, +Kleinebersdorf +( +Austria +) + +; + +holotype +of + +Conus raulini + +, Saint-Jean-de-Marsacq ( +France +), SL: +32 mm +, MD: +18.5 mm +Neuville +collection, +Université Bordeaux +n° 30.2.7. + + + + + +Illustrated +material. + + +Figs +5A + +1 +–A3: +Kleinebersdorf +( +Austria +): MD: +16.1 mm +, + +NHMW +1976 + +/1785/0044. + + + +Revised description. +Small shells with moderately low conical spire; early spire with beaded carina. Late spire whorls smooth, deeply concave near upper suture and with prominent rim at lower suture; suture narrowly incised. Subsutural flexure of medium depth, strongly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl elongate conical, slightly constricted at base. A few deep and broad spiral grooves are restricted to the base. Siphonal fasciole very weak. Aperture largely destroyed; no information on colour patterns. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 7: largest specimen (fragmented): MD: +16.1 mm +, mean SL: +23.9 mm +(σ = 1.9), mean MD: 12.7 (σ = 1.0), spire angle: µ = 100.1° (σ = 5.7°), last whorl angle: µ = 33.7° (σ = 1.1°), LW: µ = 1.89 (σ = 0.06), RD: µ = 0.66 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.9 (σ = 0.04), RSH: µ = 0.21 (σ = 0.02). + + + + +Discussion. +We do not follow +Hall (1966) +, who synonymised + +Conus allioni + +with + +Conus brocchii +Bronn, 1828 + +. + +Conilithes brocchii + +is a Pliocene species, which differs in its larger size, higher and sometimes slightly coeloconoid spire, prominent sutural ridge and the broader last whorl, lacking the slight constriction of + +C. allioni + +, which has a low and sometimes cyrtoconoid spire. + +Conus raulini +Peyrot, 1931 + +, based on a specimen from the Burdigalian of the +Aquitaine +Basin, is most probably a subjective junior synonym of + +Conus allioni +. + +This species was introduced by +Michelotti (1847) +as + +Conus Allioni +. Therefore + +, the prevailing use as + +Conus allionii + +is an incorrect subsequent spelling. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The Kleinebersdorf section represents coastal mudflat environments with + +Avicennia + +- mangroves ( + +Zuschin +et al +. 2004 + +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +? Ottnangian (early Miocene): +North Alpine Foreland Basin +: Bad Tölz ( +Germany +) ( +Steininger 1973 +); Karpatian (early Miocene): +Korneuburg Basin +: Kleinebersdorf ( +Austria +). + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +North eastern Atlantic. + +Burdigalian (early Miocene): + +Aquitaine +Basin + +: Saint- Jean-de-Marsacq, Saubrigues ( +France +) ( +Peyrot 1931 +); Turin Hills: Baldissero, Valle Ceppi ( +Italy +) ( +Sacco 1893a +; +Zunino & Pavia 2009 +). Occurrences from the early and middle Miocene of the +North Sea Basin +, mentioned by +Beyrich (1853) +and +Kautsky (1925) +seem to represent another species (see +Janssen 1984 +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB5FFA4FF5FAD13FD2A4605.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB5FFA4FF5FAD13FD2A4605.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fdada6b1d1f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB5FFA4FF5FAD13FD2A4605.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Genus + +Conilithes + +Swainson +, 1840 + + + + + + + + + +Type species (by monotypy): + +Conus antidiluvianus +Bruguière, 1792 + +. Miocene-Pliocene, Europe. + + +Note. +According to +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +this genus is characterised by species with a scalariform spire, the shoulder is angular and carinate and often bearing tubercles, but devoid of spiral sculpture. The subsutural flexure is deep and symmetrical. This is an extinct genus, with an Eocene to Pliocene stratigraphical distribution and is found in Europe and North America. +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +erected the subfamily Conilithinae for this and other related genera. The molecular phylogeny presented by Puillandre +et al +. (2014) confirmed this deeply rooted phylogenetic group and used the genus + +Conasprella +Thiele, 1929 + +, with related groups relegated to subgenus level. Based on the fossil Paratethyan material, we can confirm this generic shell description. The shells have a tall to very tall scalariform, carinate spire, with beading at least on the earliest teleoconch whorls but devoid of spiral sculpture. Last whorl without beads; along with typical spiral cords, a reticulate pattern may rarely be formed. The subsutural flexures are deep (or rarely moderately deep), strongly curved and moderately asymmetrical and the last whorl relative diameter is medium to elongate. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB6FFA4FF5FAF15FCEF4478.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB6FFA4FF5FAF15FCEF4478.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..02e43989735 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB6FFA4FF5FAF15FCEF4478.xml @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conasprella minutissima + +nov. sp. + + + + +Figs 3 +E, 4G1–G3, 4H1–H3, +4I +1–I5 + + + + + + +Holotype +: + + +Figs + +4 + + +I1–I5: SL: 13.1, MD: +6.3 mm +, + +NHMW +1869 + +/0001/0331a, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +). + + + + + +Paratype +: + +Figs 4 +H1–H3: SL: 10.6, MD: +5.1 mm +, + +NHMW +1869 + +/0001/0331b, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +). + + + + + + + +Paratype +: + +Figs 3 +E, 4G1–G3: SL: 10.4, MD: +4.7 mm +, + +NHMW +1869 + +/0001/0331c, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +). + + + + + +Additional material: +2 spec. NHMW 1869/0001/0331d, 1 spec. + + +NHMW +1858 + +/0029/0017, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1870 + +/0054/0044, +Niederleis +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1869 + +/0001/0627, +Marz +( +Austria +) + +. + + +Type stratum: +Bioclastic sand and marl of the Baden Group. + + + + +Type +locality: + +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +). + + + +Age: +Middle Miocene, middle Badenian (= late Langhian). + + + + +Etymology. +Referring to the small size. + + + + +Description. +Very small, slender biconical shells. High, scalariform spire of at least 7 teleoconch whorls. Spire whorls carinate just above suture, weakly tuberculate; sutural ramp distinctly striate. Impressed, somewhat irregular suture. Last whorl with flat to faintly concave sutural ramp, weakly striate. Subsutural flexure shallow, strongly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl elongate conical to weakly ventricose below angulated shoulder; slightly constricted at base. Aperture with subparallel margins; short wide siphonal canal. Siphonal fasciole obsolete. Sculpture consisting of about 15–20 spiral cords with spirally elongate beads. Spiral sculpture overlays much weaker growth lines forming a faintly cancellate pattern. Spirals become crowded on base where beads are only weakly developed. Colour pattern in UV light consisting of a few large, widely-spaced subquadratic blotches on sutural ramp of last whorl and weaker blotches on spire whorls; beads on last whorl appear as dots on thin spirals. + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 5: largest specimen: SL: +13.1 mm +, MD: +6.3 mm +, mean SL: 10.4 (σ = 0.8), mean MD: 5.1 (σ = 0.7), spire angle: µ = 63.2° (σ = 8.5°), last whorl angle: µ = 32.4° (σ = 2.4°), LW: µ = 2.04 (σ = 0.13), RD: µ = 0.68 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.81 (σ = 0.09), RSH: µ = 0.28 (σ = 0.04). + + + + +Discussion. +This tiny species was mixed with + +Artemidiconus stachei + +in the NHMW collections, probably due to its small size and beaded sculpture. The scalariform spire and the lack of spiral cords on the spire whorls, however, allow a clear separation. + +Conasprella berwerthi +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +develops a similar but coarser sculpture on the last whorl. Moreover, it differs in its lower spire, the much broader last whorl and it lacks subquadratic blotches on the sutural ramp. + +Phasmoconus ottiliae +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +lacks the scalariform spire outline, has an elongate last whorl, a denser spiral sculpture, lacks the prominent beads and differs in its colour pattern of dense spirals. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The occurrence at Steinebrunn suggests seagrass meadows in shallow marine nearshore settings as habitat. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Niederleis ( +Austria +), Steinebrunn ( +Austria +); + +Eisenstadt +Sopron +Basin + +: Marz, Forchtenau ( +Austria +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB7FFA6FF5FAB68FB9E44B7.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB7FFA6FF5FAB68FB9E44B7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..78ac7dbb9ce --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB7FFA6FF5FAB68FB9E44B7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + +Genus + +Conasprella +Thiele 1929 + + + + + + + + +Type +species (by subsequent designation, +Tucker & Tenorio 2009 +): + +Conus pagoda +Kiener, 1847 + +. +Recent +, +Pacific +, +Philippines +. + + + +Note. +According to +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +the genus + +Conasprella +Thiele 1929 + +is characterised by relatively small-shelled species, the spire is relatively elevated, with beaded early whorls. Cords may be present or absent on the spire whorls, the last whorl has sulci that reach mid-whorl and often the shoulder; the subsutural sinus is deep; an anterior notch is absent; and the protoconch is multispiral. This genus has a Miocene to Recent Indo-Pacific distribution. It is similar in shell characters to the +Western +Atlantic genus + +Jaspidiconus +Petuch 1993 + +, which also has a Miocene to Recent record in tropical America (Landau & da +Silva 2010 +), but differs in having tubercles developed along the shoulder carina of the last whorl. + +Jaspidiconus + +, together with + +Perplexiconus +Tucker & Tenorio, 2009 + +, were considered synonyms of + +Ximeniconus +Emerson & Old, 1962 + +by + +Puillandre +et al +. (2014a) + +, although one can see that each of these groups is distinct, with + +Perplexiconus + +and + +Ximeniconus + +more closely related than + +Jaspidiconus + +. + +Conus jaspideus +Gmelin, 1791 + +, the +type +species of + +Jaspidiconus + +, has a symmetrical curved subsutural flexure ( +Hendricks 2009 +), requiring a revised diagnosis of + +Conasprella + +, if + +Jaspidiconus + +is considered as synonym of it, although it is more likely that they are distinct genera; + +Conasprella + +is restricted to the Indo-Pacific, while + +Jaspidiconus + +is tropical American. All Paratethyan species placed in + +Conasprella + +herein have tuberculate early spire whorls and beaded cords on the last whorl. Their subsutural flexures are shallow, moderately to strongly curved and moderately asymmetrical. This is an interesting record as it suggests, amongst others, a Paratethyan occurrence of a taxon nowadays restricted to the Indo-West Pacific. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB7FFA7FF5FAE59FD80467A.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB7FFA7FF5FAE59FD80467A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f037e6c7b11 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFB7FFA7FF5FAE59FD80467A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,500 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Conasprella berwerthi +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +B, 4C1–C2, 4D1–D3, 4E1–E3, 4F1–F4, + + + + + +Conus catenatus +Sow. + +—Hörnes 1851: 42, pl. 5, figs 4a–c, fig. 4 without letter [non + +Conus catenatus +Sowerby I, 1850 + +, non + +Conus catenatus +Sowerby III, 1879 + +]. + + + +[ + +Leptoconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Berwerthi + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +Berwerthi + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 35 + +, pl. 5, figs 11–12. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Rhizoconus +) +catenatus +Sow. + +— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 37 + +[non + +Conus catenatus +Sowerby I, 1850 + +, non + +Conus catenatus +Sowerby III, 1879 + +]. + + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Conospirus +) +antediluvianus + +] forma +excatenata +Sacc.— + +Sacco 1893a +: 44 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus catenatus +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 5, figs 4a–c]. + + + + + +Hemiconus + +(?) + +cf. +catenatus +Sow. + +— + +Friedberg 1938 +: 156 + +, text-fig. 51 [non + +Conus catenatus +Sowerby I, 1850 + +, non + +Conus catenatus +Sowerby III, 1879 + +]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1860 + +/0001/0074a, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 5, fig. 11) + + +; + +syntype + +NHMW +1860 + +/0001/0074b, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 5, fig. 12) + +; middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +(late +Langhian +). + + + + + +Studied +material. + +Syntypes +and 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0038, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, figs 4a–c), +holotype +of + +Conus excatenatus +Sacco, 1893 + +; 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1860 + +/0001/0074, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 5, fig. 4); 1 spec + +. NHMW 2015/0416/0001, 1 spec. NHMW 2015/0416/ 0002; 1 spec. + + +NHMW +2015 + +/0416/0003, +Steinebrunn +or +Gainfarn +( +Austria +). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 4 +C1–C2: Steinebrunn ( +Austria +): SL: +10 mm +, MD: +4.7 mm +, +NHMW +1860/0001/ 0074b, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 5, fig. 12) +; +Figs 4 +D1–D3: Steinebrunn or Gainfarn ( +Austria +): SL: +20.5 mm +, MD: +9.4 mm +, +NHMW +2015/0416/0002; +Figs 4 +E1–E3: Steinebrunn or Gainfarn ( +Austria +): SL: +20.9 mm +, MD: +9.7 mm +, +NHMW +2015/0416/0001; +Figs 3 +B, 4F1–F4: Steinebrunn ( +Austria +): SL: +22.7 mm +, MD: +11.8 mm +, +NHMW +1846/0037/0038, illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 5, figs 4a–c). + + +Revised description. +Small biconical shells of about +20–23 mm +height; protoconch high conical, comprising at least three whorls. Spire height moderate to high, coeloconoid. Whorls with broad, straight to weakly concave sutural ramp, periphery placed a short distance above suture, below whorl tapering in towards lower suture. Shoulder bearing more or less well defined beads, starting at carina and extending to suture during ontogeny. Delicate and finely beaded spiral threads appear below shoulder on penultimate whorls. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl conical with 13 to 16 wide spaced spiral rows of small but prominent, spirally elongate beads. Beads merge into spiral ribs close to siphonal canal and fasciole. Distinct growth lines between the glossy spiral rows. Base weakly constricted. Siphonal fasciole narrow and indistinct; aperture with parallel margins, moderately narrow. Siphonal canal short, weakly twisted, poorly delimited from base. Colour pattern in UV light consisting of light dots coinciding with the beads on last whorl; short opisthocline stripes, following the subsutural flexure, appear close below the shoulder and merge with the dots on the uppermost spiral row of beads. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +4 adult +specimens: largest specimen: SL: +22.7 mm +, MD: +11.8 mm +, mean SL: +21.1 mm +(σ = 1.1), mean MD: +10.2 mm +(σ = 1.1), spire angle: µ = 78° (σ = 14.9°), last whorl angle: µ = 32.3° (σ = 2.2°), LW: µ = 2.1 (σ = 0.1), RD: µ = 0.6 (σ = 0.05), PMD: µ = 0.9 (σ = 0.04), RSH: µ = 0.2 (σ = 0.05). + + + + +Discussion. +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +doubted that the specimen illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 5) as +Fig. 4 +was conspecific with the specimen illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 5, figs 4a–c) as + +Conus catenatus + +and separated it as + +Conus berwerthi + +. They based the separation on the smaller size, the more slender shape and the lack of pustulose spiral threads in the upper half of the last whorl of + +C. berwerthi + +. +Sacco (1893a) +recognized that the Viennese Miocene + +Conus catenatus + +of Hörnes (1851) and +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +was not conspecific with the extant American + +C. catenatus +Sowerby + +III, 1 879 [= + +Tenorioconus granarius +(Kiener, 1847) + +] and proposed +excatenata +as new variation name. In our opinion, the differences between both morphologies are only ontogenetic stages of a single species. + +Conus berwerthi + +is based on three juvenile to subadult shells, which lack the broad and strongly sculptured last whorl of + +C. excatenatus + +. Moreover, both +types +were collected at the same locality. Consequently, + +Conus berwerthi + +gains priority over + +C. excatenatus +. + +The Paratethyan species is also not conspecific with the American + +Conus catenatus +Sowerby I, 1850 + +, which has concave spire whorls. + +A very rare species, which is easily recognized by its characteristic beaded sculpture. + +Paleoenvironment. +The Austrian occurrences point to shallow sublittoral settings as the preferred paleoenvironment of this species. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Steinebrunn, Drasenhofen ( +Austria +); +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin +: Marz, Mattersburg ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Sieber 1958b +); +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Grund ( +Austria +), Drnovice u Vyškova ( +Czech Republic +), Sboriw ( +Ukraine +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Friedberg 1938 +; +Sieber 1947 +); +Transylvanian Basin +: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Moisescu 1955b +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFBCFFA6FF5FAEC8FCAB43EE.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFBCFFA6FF5FAEC8FCAB43EE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d04f6697d92 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFBCFFA6FF5FAEC8FCAB43EE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1162 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Artemidiconus granularis +( +Borson, 1820 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +A, 4A1–A3,4B1–B3 + + + + + + +Conus Granularis + +— + +Borson 1820 +: 196 + +, pl. 1, fig. 3. + + + + + +Conus +( +Stephanoconus +) +Stachei + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 16 + +, pl. 6, figs 14–16. + + + + +[ + +Conus granuliferus +Grat. + +var.] + +Drnowitzensis +de + +Greg.— + +De Gregorio 1885 +: 376 + +. + + + + + + +[ + +Conus granuliferus +Grat. + +var.] + +opellus +de Greg. + +— + +De Gregorio 1885 +: 376 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus stachei +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 6, fig. 14]. + + + +[ + +Conus + +] +H +.[ +emiconus +] + +granularis + + +var. +Stachei + +(H. A.)—Sacco 1893: 123, pl. 11, fig. 37. + + +[ + +Conus +( +Hemiconus +) +granularis + + +var. +Stachei + +] + +var. druowitzensis + +[sic] De Greg.—Sacco 1893: 123 [nov. nom. pro + +Conus stachei +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 6, fig. 15]. + + +[ + +Conus +( +Hemiconus +) +granularis + + +var. +Stachei + +] + +var. lissitzensis +Sacc. + +—Sacco 1893: 123 [nov. nom. pro +Conus + +stachei +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 6, fig. 16]. + + + +Hemiconus granularis +Bors. + +—Friedberg 1911: 45, pl. 2, fig. 10. + + + + + +Conus +( +Hemiconus +) +granularis +Bors. var. +stachei +Hörn. + +u. Auin.— +Meznerics 1932 +/1933: 346, pl. 14, fig. 2. + + + +Conus +( +Stephanoconus +) +stachei +Hoernes + +et Auinger—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 421, pl. 3, fig. 7. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Hemiconus +) +granularis +Borson—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 208 + + +, pl. 49, fig. 2. + + + + +Conus +( +Hemiconus +) +granularis stachei +Hoernes & Auinger—Strausz 1966: 450 + +, pl. 66, fig. 9. + + + + +Conus +( +Stephanoconus +) +granularis stachei +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 152 + +, pl. 38, figs 11a–b. + + + + + +Conus granularis +Bronn, 1820 + +[sic]— + + +Zelinskaya +et al +. 1968 + +: 228 + +, pl. 51, fig. 19. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Hemiconus +) +granularis stachei +Hoernes + +et Auinger—Csepreghy-Mezneric 1972: 34, pl. 17, figs 23–24. + + + + + +Conus granularis +Borson—Pavia 1976: 157 + +, pl. 2, fig. 12 (holotype). + + + + +Conus +( +Hemiconus +) +granularis stachei +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 181 + +, pl. 40, figs 13–14. + + + + + +Hemiconus granularis +( +Borson, 1820 +) + +— + +Bałuk 1997 +: 54 + +, pl. 20, figs 1–4. + + + + + +Conilithes granularis +( +Borson, 1820 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 93 + +, fig. 160. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Lectotype +(following +ICZN +Article +74.6), illustrated in + +Borson +(1820, pl. 5, fig. 3) + +and + +Pavia +(1976, pl. 2, fig. 12) + +, stored in the +Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali +, +Torino. The +type +locality is given as +Valle Andona +( +Italy +), which is of +Pliocene +age. +Pavia +(1876) assumed that this was an error by + +Borson +(1820) + +and pointed out that the preservation corresponds to material from the +Messinian +of +Borelli +( +Turin Hills +). +The +type +localities of the taxa considered to be junior synonyms of + +A. granularis + +are: + +Conus stachei +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, +Baden +( +Austria +) + +; + +Conus drnowitzensis +De Gregorio, 1885 + +, Drnovice u Vyškova (Czech Republic); + +Conus opellus +De Gregorio, 1885 + +, Baden (Austria); + +Conus lissitzensis +Sacco, 1893 + +, Lysice (Czech Republic); all are of middle Miocene (Badenian/Langhian) age. + + + +Studied material. +6 spec. + +NHMW +1864 + +/0001/0441, +Drnovice +u +Vyškova +( +Czech Republic +), including +holotype +of + +Conus granuliferus drnowitzensis +De Gregorio, 1885 + +; 3 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1865 + +/0015/0004, +Lysice +( +Czech Republic +), including +holotype +of + +Conus granularis lissitzensis +Sacco, 1893 + +; 2 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1865 + +/0036/0103, +Lysice +( +Czech Republic +) + +; + +4 spec. + +NHMW +1871 + +/0011/0001, +Sedlec +( +Czech Republic +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1861 + +/0040/ 0 0 28, +Hrušovany +( +Czech Republic +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1999 + +z0077/0025, +Baden +( +Austria +), designated herein as +lectotype +of + +Conus stachei +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + + +, + +holotype +of + +Conus granuliferus opellus +De Gregorio, 1885 + +; 20 spec. + +NHMW +1863 + +/0015/0604, +Niederleis +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1887 + +/0018/0014, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), illustrated in + +Meznerics +(1932 + +/1933, pl. 14, fig. 2); 5 spec + +. NHMW 1846/0037/0038, 17 spec. + + +NHMW +1868 + +/0001/ 0 0 93, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 3 +A, 4A1–A3: Lysice ( +Czech Republic +): SL: +15.1 mm +, MD: 8.0 mm, +NHMW +1865/ 0015/0004, specimen illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig. 16) +(= +holotype +of + +Conus granularis lissitzensis +Sacco, 1893 + +); +Figs 4 +B1–B3: Baden ( +Austria +): SL: +15.2 mm +, MD: +7.9 mm +, +NHMW +1999z0077/0025, specimen illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig. 14) +(= +holotype +of + +Conus granuliferus opellus +De Gregorio, 1885 + +). + + +Revised description. +Small shells of about +13–15 mm +in length, biconical, with moderately high conical spire and stout, ventricose last whorl; slightly constricted at base. Protoconch high conical, comprising at least three whorls. Early spire whorls forming a narrow, beaded upper sutural band and a tuberculate lower part. Subsequent spire whorls consisting of two adsutural spiral bands separated by a narrow groove; a secondary spiral cord appears between the spiral bands on late spire whorls; upper band usually bearing small beads. Subsutural flexure very shallow, moderately curved, nearly symmetrical. Last whorl weakly angulated in subadult shells, rounded in adults; broad and weak nodes appear along the shoulder in some specimens resulting in a wavy appearance. Widely spaced pustulose spiral ridges on lower half of last whorl grading into sharp spiral cords on ventral side. Upper half of last whorl with sharp spiral cords, which rarely bear beads. Base faintly constricted. Aperture straight, slightly broadening in abapical half. Fasciole short, moderately swollen, covered with spiral threads. No colour pattern observed. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +13 adult +specimens; largest specimen: SL: +15.2 mm +, MD: +7.9 mm +, mean SL: +13.6 mm +(σ = 0.8), mean MD: 7.2 (σ = 0.4), spire angle: µ = 68° (σ = 2.9°), last whorl angle: µ = 41° (σ = 4.6°), LW: µ = 1.9 (σ = 0.07), RD: µ = 0.74 (σ = 0.04), PMD: µ = 0.9 (σ = 0.05), RSH: µ = 0.29 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +This species is synonymized with the Italian early Miocene to Pliocene + +Conus granularis +( +Borson, 1820 +) + +(e.g. +Bałuk 1997 +). + +Conus granuliferus +Grateloup, 1835 + +, from the early Miocene of the Aquitaine Basin, was also considered a synonym of + +C. granularis + +by most authors (e.g. +Hall 1966 +, + +Lozouet +et al +. 2001 + +). The specimens from the Badenian of the Paratethys seemingly differ from the Italian and French specimens in their mode of spire formation. +Hall (1966) +and +Davoli (1972) +described and figured a spire sculpture consisting of two cords separated by a deep groove. The same sculpture is seen in the somewhat abraded holotype of + +Conus granularis + +as illustrated in +Pavia (1976) +and in the French specimen illustrated in + +Lozouet +et al +. (2001) + +. The Paratethyan shells, however, develop a secondary cord on the groove separating the two main cords. Some specimens of + +A. granularis + +from the Tortonian of Italy in the NHMW-collection, however, show a clear secondary cord as well. Therefore, this feature seems to reflect intraspecific variability and consequently we do not separate the Paratethyan specimens as a distinct species. + + +Sacco (1893b) +placed the Italian + +Conus granularis + +Borson, +1820 + + +in + +Hemiconus +Cossmann, 1889 + +, which in our opinion is an exclusively Eocene genus. Consequently, Friedberg (1911) and +Bałuk (1997) +treated the Paratethyan species also as + +Hemiconus + +. Its +type +species, + +Hemiconus stromboides +( +Lamarck, 1803 +) + +, from the Eocene of the Paris Basin, is high spired fusiform species with blunt nodes on the spire whorls. Other species placed in + +Hemiconus + +by +Cossmann & Pissarro (1911) +show a similar spire sculpture of nodes and a granulose cord along the upper suture. These morphologies have nothing in common with the Miocene species and therefore the placement in + +Hemiconus + +is herein rejected. +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +listed + +Conus granularis +Borson, 1820 + +within + +Conilithes + +Swainson +, 1840 + + +, but the mode of spire formation in + +C. granularis + +is different from the scalariform spire of + +Conilithes + +. Moreover, the spirally elongate beads on the last whorl of + +C. granularis + +do not occur in any + +Conilithes + +species and we follow the recommendation by John K. Tucker (pers. comm.) to treat + +Conus stachei + +( + += +granularis + +) tentatively as + +Artemidiconus + +, despite the large geographic gap between the European Miocene record and the extant +Western +Atlantic occurrence. + + + + + +Artemidiconus granularis + +is a moderately variable species. Adult specimens are more ventricose than the comparatively more slender subadult ones, which have a more pronounced shoulder. Similarly, the sculpture of beads on the last whorl displays some variability. This intraspecific and ontogenetic variability led de +Gregorio (1885) +and Sacco (1893) to propose new variation names for each of the + +Conus stachei + +specimens illustrated by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +. Consequently, one of the three names of de +Gregorio (1885) +and Sacco (1893) is an objective synonym of + +C. stachei + +and the other two are subjective synonyms. To settle this, a +lectotype +of + +C. stachei + +has to be selected. Thus, we designate the specimen illustrated as fig. 14 by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +as +lectotype +of + +Conus stachei + +. + + + +FIGURE 3. +Oblique views of selected specimens. +A3. + +Artemidiconus granularis +(Borson, 1820) + +, Lysice (Czech Republic), NHMW 1865/0015/0004. +3B. + +Conasprella berwerthi +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1846/0037/ 0 0 38. +Fig. 3C. + +Conilithes antidiluvianus +(Bruguière, 1792) + +, Möllersdorf (Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/0247. +3D. + +Conilithes exaltatus +(Eichwald, 1830) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 1862/0001/0310. +3E. + +Conasprella minutissima + +nov. sp., Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/031c, paratype. +3F. + +Conilithes brezinae +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1999z0077/0023e, syntype. +3G1–G2. + +Kalloconus berghausi +(Michelotti, 1847) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1856/0050/0413. +Fig. 3H. + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +nov. sp., Pöls (Austria), NHMW 1861/0001/0226. +Fig. 3I. + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +nov. sp., Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1870/003/0005c. +3J. + +Kalloconus cacellensis + +(Pereira da Costa, 1866), Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1855/0043/0002. +3K. + +Kalloconus gallicus +(Mayer-Eymar, 1890) + +, Nemeşeşti (Romania), NHMW 2016/0036/0001. +3L. + +Kalloconus hungaricus +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Coşteiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1867/0029/0004. +3M. + +Kalloconus letkesensis + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), private collection Anton Breitenberger. +3N. + +Kalloconus moravicus +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Mikulov-Kienberk (Czech Republic), NHMW 2016/003/0001. +3P. + +Kalloconus ponderoaustriacus +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/0035/0041, holotype. +3Q. + +Kalloconus ponderovagus +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Niederkreuzstetten (Austria), NHMW 1849/0004/0016, holotype. +3R. +Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), + +Kalloconus pseudohungaricus + +nov. sp., NHMW 1868/0001/0380c, paratype. +3S. + +Kalloconus tietzei +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, NHMW 1847/0046/0004, Szob (Hungary), holotype. +3T. + +Kalloconus tschermaki +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Niederkreuzstetten (Austria), NHMW 1864/0001/0499, syntype. +3U. + +Kalloconus voeslauensis +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 1849/0023/0005b, syntype. +3V. + +Lautoconus eschewegi + +(Pereira da Costa, 1866), Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1858/0043/0007. +3W. + +Lautoconus kovacsi + +nov. sp., Letkés, (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0003/0004. + + + + +FIGURE 4A1–A3. + +Artemidiconus granularis +(Borson, 1820) + +, Lysice (Czech Republic), NHMW 1865/0015/0004. +4B1–B3. + +Artemidiconus granularis +(Borson, 1820) + +, Baden (Austria), NHMW 1999z0077/0025. +4C1–C2. + +Conasprella berwerthi +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1860/0001/0074b. +4D1–D3. + +Conasprella berwerthi +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Steinebrunn or Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 2015/0416/0002. +4E1–E3. + +Conasprella berwerthi +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Steinebrunn or Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 2015/0416/0001. +4F1–F4. + +Conasprella berwerthi +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1846/0037/0038. +4G1–G3. + +Conasprella minutissima + +nov. sp., Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/0331c, paratype. +4H1–H3. + +Conasprella minutissima + +nov. sp., Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/0331b, paratype. +4I1–I5. + +Conasprella minutissima + +nov. sp., Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/0331a, holotype. + + + +Paleoenvironment. +In the +Vienna +Basin, this species is found in shallow sublittoral settings partly with sea grass meadows (e.g. + +Zuschin +et al. +2007 + +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Baden, Steinebrunn, Niederleis ( +Austria +), Hrušovany nad Jevišovkou, Sedlec ( +Czech Republic +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Sieber 1956 +); +Bükk Mountains +: Borsodbóta ( +Hungary +); +Pannonian Basin +: Szob ( +Hungary +) (Csepreghy-Mecnerics 1956; +Strausz 1966 +; +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Carpathian Foredeep +: Drnovice u Vyškova, Lysice ( +Czech Republic +), Korytnica, Małoszów, Dryszczów ( +Poland +), Sboriw ( +Ukraine +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; + +Zelinskaya +et al +. 1968 + +; +Bałuk 1997 +); +Transylvanian Basin +: Coşteiu de Sus, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Boettger 1902 +); +Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: +Valea Bela Reca ( +Romania +) ( +Hinculov 1968 +); +Dacian Basin +: Portitovci ( +Bulgaria +) ( +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +); +southern Pannonian Basin +: Hrvaćani ( +Bosnia and Herzegovina +) ( +Atanacković 1985 +). + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +north eastern Atlantic. + +Aquitanian ( +France +: +Aquitaine +Basin) ( + +Lozouet +et al +. 2001 + +), Burdigalian ( +Italy +: Colli Torinesi; +France +Aquitaine +Basin) ( +Peyrot 1931 +; +Hall 1966 +), Tortonian ( +Italy +: Sant'Agata Fossili, Stazzano Montegibbio) ( +Davoli 1972 +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFBCFFADFF5FAD3FFE7D471C.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFBCFFADFF5FAD3FFE7D471C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..de58faee064 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFBCFFADFF5FAD3FFE7D471C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + +Genus + +Artemidiconus +da +Motta, 1991 + + + + + + + + +Type +species (by original designation): + +Conus selenae +van +Mol, Tursch & Kempf, 1967 + +; +Recent +, +Western +Atlantic. + + + +Note. +According to +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +, this genus is characterised by short and rounded shells with convex spire whorls with cords. Nodules on spire whorls are absent or become obsolete very early. The subsutural flexure is shallow and asymmetrical. In addition, we consider the presence of more or less prominent beads on the last whorl as a characteristic feature, being also present on the +type +species. The genus + +Artemidiconus + +was not treated by + +Puillandre +et al +. (2014 a + +, +b +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC1FFD1FF5FA9AAFBA4430A.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC1FFD1FF5FA9AAFBA4430A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..30a77f8d2cf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC1FFD1FF5FA9AAFBA4430A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,613 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus subraristriatus + +(Pereira da +Costa, 1866 +) + + + + + +Figs +17 + +I, 21G1–G3, 21H + + + + + +Conus raristriatus +Bell. et Mich. + +—Hörnes 1851: 28, pl. 3, figs 2a–c [non + +Conus raristriatus +Bellardi & Michelotti, 1840 + +]. + + + + +Conus subraristriatus +Costa—Pereira + +da + +Costa 1866 +: 15 + +(partim, pl. 4, figs. 7a, b only) [non figs 2–6 = + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +]. + + + + +[ + +Chelyconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Enzesfeldensis + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Enzesfeldensis + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 46 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus raristriatus +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 3, fig. 2]. + + + +? + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +subraristriatus +Da + +Costa—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 422, pl. 11, figs 1–2. + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +enzesfeldensis +Hoernes + +et Auinger—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 420, pl. 3, fig. 9. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +enzesfeldensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 460 + +, pl. 70, figs 2–9. + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Cleobula +) +subraristriatus +Costa, 1866 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 465 + +, pl. 61, figs 3–5. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +raristriatus +Bellardi & Michelotti—Atanacković 1969: 215 + +, pl. 13, figs 2–2b. + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +subraristriatus +Da + +Costa—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972: 34, pl. 17, figs 18–19. + + + +Conus raristriatus +Bellardi & Michelotti—Davoli 1972 + +: pl. 25, figs 2a–2b [non + +Conus raristriatus +Bellardi & Michelotti, 1840 + +, specimen is from Vienna Basin]. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +enzesfeldensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 177 + +, pl. 39, figs 14–15. + + + + +? + +Conus enzesfeldensis +(Hoernes et Auinger) + +— + +Ionesi & Nicorici 1994 +: 62 + +, pl. 5, figs 9–10. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +enzesfeldensis +Hoernes & Auinger—Schultz 1998: 72 + +, pl. 29, fig. 8. + + + + +Varioconus enzesfeldensis +(Hoernes et Auinger) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 84 + +, figs 3, 116–120. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +subraristriatus +da Costa—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 23 + + +, pl. 1, figs 20–22 [fig. 20 = + +Lautoconus eschewegi + +(Pereira da + +Costa +, 1866 + +), figs 21– 22 = + +Kalloconus berghausi +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +]. non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +enzesfeldensis +Hoernes et Auinger—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 3, figs 3a–b [= + +Lautoconus pseudoponderosus +(Glibert, 1952) + +]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Lectotype +designated by + +Landau +et al. +(2013) + +: specimen illustrated in Pereira da + +Costa +(1866, pl. 4, fig. 7) + +; +Cacela Basin +( +Portugal +) + +; late Miocene, Tortonian. The type locality of + +Conus enzesfeldensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, considered to be a junior synonym of + +L. subraristriatus + +, is the middle Miocene (Badenian) locality Enzesfeld in Austria. + + +Studied material. +4 spec NHMW 1853/0010/0004, 4 spec. NHMW 1853/0010/0006, 6 spec. + +NHMW +A1610, including specimen illustrated in + +Schultz +(1998, pl. 29, fig. 8.) + +, all +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +), 1 spec + +NHMW +1857 + +/0014/ 0 0 0 5, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), 2 spec + +. + +NHMW +A 992, +Grund +( +Austria +). + + + + + +Illustrated +material. + + +Figs +21 + +G1–G3: +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +): SL: +57.9 mm +, MD: +29.8 mm +, + +NHMW +1853 + +/0010/ 0006a; +Figs.21 +H: +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +), SL: +52.6 mm +, MD: +27.9 mm +, +NHMW +A1610; +Fig + +. + + +17I + +: +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +): SL: +48.7 mm +, MD: +25.3 mm +, + +NHMW +1853 + +/0010/0006b. + + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized, solid shells; spire of medium height, cyrtoconoid; spire whorls very weakly convex, smooth; subsutural flexure shallow, weakly curved, moderately asymmetrical; last whorl elongate, roundly shouldered, straight-sided, position of maximum diameter at shoulder; hardly constricted at base; bearing few weak, finely beaded spiral cords at the anterior end in some specimens; aperture straight, relatively narrow, widening slightly abapically; siphonal canal short, straight; siphonal fasciole rounded, relatively well-developed; colour pattern under UV light of widely spaced, narrow brownish dots and dashes, coalescing into straight spiral lines forming three continuous fluorescing bands, separating two narrow regions lacking pigmentation. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 13: largest specimen: SL: +80.4 mm +, MD: +39.4 mm +, mean SL: +54.3 mm +(σ = 9.2), mean MD: +28.1 mm +(σ = 4.2), spire angle: µ = 92.6° (σ = 2.9°), last whorl angle: µ = 34.6° (σ = 1.0°), LW: µ = 1.9 (σ = 0.06), RD: µ = 0.63 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.84 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.18 (σ = 0.02). + + + + +Discussion. +The status of this species was discussed in detail by + +Landau +et al +. (2013) + +, who designated the specimen illustrated by Pereira da +Costa (1866, pl. 4, fig. 7) +as lectotype of + +L. subraristriatus + +, which is conspecific with + +Conus enzesfeldensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Typically found in shallow marine, sandy nearshore environments. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Enzesfeld, Bad Vöslau, Steinebrunn, Pötzleinsdorf ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Sieber 1958b +); +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Grund ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +),? +Bükk Mountains: +Borsodbóta ( +Hungary +) ( +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972 +); +Pannonian Basin: +Szob, Letkés ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +southern Pannonian Basin +: Miljevići ( +Bosnia and Herzegovina +) ( +Atanacković 1985 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Nemeşeşti, Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus, Bujtur ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +);? + +Buzău +Basin + +: Valea Muscel ( +Romania +) ( +Ionesi & Nicorici 1994 +). + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +northeastern Atlantic. + +Serravallian: +Karman Basin +( +Turkey +) ( + +Landau e +t al. +2013 + +); Tortonian: Cacela Velha, Cacela Basin ( +Portugal +) (Pereira da + +Costa +, 1866 + +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC3FFD0FF5FAF42FA0840E2.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC3FFD0FF5FAF42FA0840E2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..56c95de2f68 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC3FFD0FF5FAF42FA0840E2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,535 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus steindachneri +(Hoernes, 1879) + + + + + +Figs 17 +F, 21E1–E3, 21F1–F3 + + + + +[ + +Dendroconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Hochstetteri + +n. f.— +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 (nomen nudum) + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +Hochstetteri + +nov. form.— +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 24 (partim), pl. 3, fig. 3 [non + +Conus hochstetteri +Martin, 1879 + +]. + + + +Conus Steindachneri + +—Hoernes 1879: 201 [nov. nom. pro + +Conus hochstetteri +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +] + + + +Dendroconus Steindachneri + +nov. form.— +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: pl. 3, plates captions. + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +voeslauensis +Hoernes und Auinger 1879 + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 215 + +, pl. 51, fig. 4 [non + +Kalloconus voeslauensis +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +] + + + + + +Conus +( +Cleobula +) +steindachneri +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 465 + +, pl. 71, figs 6–9. + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +steindachneri +R. Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Mikuž 2009 +: 35 + +, pl. 12, fig. 162. + + + + + +Dendroconus steindachneri +( +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 67 + +, figs 47–49. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +steindachneri +Hoernes + +et Auinger—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 422, pl. 12, figs 1–2. + + +non + +Conus (Dendroconus) steindachneri +Hoernes et Auinger—Atanacković 1963: 79 + +, pl. 14, figs 5–6 [same specimen described as + +Conus steinabrunnensis +in +Atanacković, 1985 + +] + + +non + +Conus +( +Cleobula) steindachneri +Hörnes & Auinger, 1879 + +—Harzhauser 2002: 114, pl. 10, figs 1–3 [= + +Kalloconus ponderovagus +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Cleobula +) +steindachneri +Hoernes et Auinger—Hasani & + +Vazari 2011 +: 128 + + +, fig. 7/G. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Lectotype + +NHMW +1949 + +/0005/0004, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +); illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 3, fig. 3) + +(designated herein); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +(late +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material. +1 spec. + +NHMW +1949 + +/0005/0004, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +); illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 3, fig. 3) + +; 15 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1855 + +/0045/0858, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +) + +; + +5 spec. + +NHMW +1997 + +z0178/1179, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +) + +; + +3 spec. +NHMW +A1631, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +; + +4 spec. + +NHMW +1856 + +/0004/0413, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 21 +E1–E3: Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +), SL: +51.2 mm +, MD: +32.1 mm +, +NHMW +1949/0005/ 0 0 0 4, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 3, fig. 3) +; +Figs 21 +F1–F3: Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +), SL: 47.0 mm, MD: +30.5 mm +, +NHMW +1997z0178/1179; +Fig. 17 +F: Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +), SL: 41.0 mm, MD: +25.2 mm +, +NHMW +1855/ 0045/0858. + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized, club-shaped solid shells with low conical spire. Pointed early spire; later spire whorls weakly convex, faintly striate; deep, narrowly canaliculated suture. Subsutural flexure shallow, weakly curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last spire whorl rapidly broadening; position of maximum diameter coinciding with periphery of prominent subangular to rounded shoulder; last whorl rapidly contracting, straightsided except for a very faint convexity mid-whorl. Prominent, strongly twisted siphonal fasciole; siphonal canal moderately wide, long, strongly recurved. Surface glossy with delicate growth lines and rather weak spiral grooves on lower third of last whorl. Colour pattern very weak (or weakly preserved) consisting of numerous thin spirals, which are continuous or composed of nearly continuous spirals of long dashes. + + + + +Shell ratios and measurement. +n = +10 adult +specimens: largest specimen: SL: +51.2 mm +, MD: +33.4 mm +, mean SL: +46.4 mm +(σ = 3.7), mean MD: +29.4 mm +(σ = 2.5), spire angle: µ = 116.9° (σ = 6.5°), last whorl angle: µ = 37.5° (σ = 1.0°), LW: µ = 1.58 (σ = 0.04), RD: µ = 0.72 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.89 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.12 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +described this species as + +Conus hochstetteri + +in the text of their monograph. This name was already preoccupied by + +Conus hochstetteri +Martin, 1879 + +, a Miocene species from Indonesia. The monograph of Martin was already available to R. Hoernes before publication of the monograph of +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +but it was too late for changes in type setting. When recognizing the homonymy Hoernes (1879) introduced + +Conus steindachneri + +as new name for the Viennese species. This name was subsequently also added in the plate captions of +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +. Nevertheless, the authorship has to be passed to Hoernes (1879) and not to +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +as frequently done in the literature. + + +When introducing this taxon +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +referred to early Miocene specimens from Niederkreuzstetten ( +Austria +) and to middle Miocene specimens from Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +), thus mixing two species. The early Miocene specimens, including the specimen illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 3, fig. 8), represent + +Kalloconus ponderovagus +(Sacco, 1893) + +(see discussion of + +K. ponderovagus + +). The description of + +Conus steindachneri + +by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +is mainly based on the middle Miocene specimens but the early Miocene specimens are +syntypes +as well. To settle this problem, we designate the specimen from Bad Vöslau, illustrated by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 3, fig. 3) +as +lectotype +to clarify the status of this species. + + + + + +Kalloconus moravicus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +may develop a similar outline but differs in its slightly more curved subsutural flexure, the shorter siphonal canal and the wide-spaced spiral pattern. The specimen from the early Miocene of +Iran +, described by +Hasani & Vazari (2011) +as + +Conus steindachneri + +, is a different species with marked shoulder. + + +Paleoenvironment. +In the Vienna and Transylvanian basins, this species occurs in offshore clays. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Grund ( +Austria +); + +Vienna +Basin + +: Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +), Mikulov-Kienberk ( +Czech Republic +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Pannonian Basin +: Szob, Letkés ( +Hungary +) ( +Strausz 1966 +; +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Dacian Basin +: Târnene, Orehovica ( +Bulgaria +) ( +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Boettger 1906 +); +Krka Basin: +Golobinjek pri Šentjerneju ( +Slovenia +) ( +Mikuž 2009 +). The occurrence of this species in the Tortonian of Barcelona, mentioned by Faura I Sans (1908), needs confirmation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC4FFD2FF5FAC34FDF24783.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC4FFD2FF5FAC34FDF24783.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..60a53c5a3b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC4FFD2FF5FAC34FDF24783.xml @@ -0,0 +1,702 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus steinabrunnensis +(Sacco, 1893) + + + + + +Figs 17 +H, 21B1–B3, 21C1–C3, 21D1–D3 + + + + + + +Conus +( +Rhizoconus +) +ponderosus +Brocc. Var. + +I—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 39 + +(partim), pl. 5, fig. 4 [non + +Lautoconus ponderosus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + + + + +Conus +( +Rhizoconus +) +ponderosus +Brocc. Var. + +II—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 39 + +(partim), pl. 5, fig. 5 [non + +Lautoconus ponderosus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Chelyconus) conoponderosus +Sacc. + +] + +var. +steinabrunnensis +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 75 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus ponderosus +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 5, fig. 4]. + + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Chelyconus) conoponderosus +Sacc. + +] + +var. +grinzingensis +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 75 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus ponderosus +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 5, fig. 5]. + + + +non + +Conus ponderosus +Brocc. + + +var. +Steinabrunnensis + +Sacco—Friedberg 1911: 58, pl. 3, fig. 3, text-fig. 12. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Rhizoconus) ponderosus steinabrunnensis + +— +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956 +: plate captions, pl. 11, figs 11–12. + + +non + +Conus +( +Rhizoconus +) +ponderosus grinzingensis + +Sacco—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 436, pl. 10, figs 1–2. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +ponderosus steinabrunnensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 177 + +, pl. 39, figs 12–13. + + + + +non + +Conus ponderosus steinabrunnensis +(Sacco) + +— + +Ionesi & Nicorici 1994 +: 62 + +, pl. 5, fig. 6. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus) ponderosus +var. +steinabrunnensis +(Sacco) + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 213 + +, pl. 50, fig. 8 [? + +Kalloconus ponderoaustriacus +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Rhizoconus +) +steinabrunnensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +— + +Bałuk 1997 +: 61 + +, pl. 22, figs 1–3. + + + + +non + +Chelyconus steinabrunnensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 61 + +, figs 22–27. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype + +NHMW +1855 + +/0045/0005, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 5, fig. 4) + +, middle +Miocene +( +Badenian +). +The +type +locality of + +Conus grinzingensis +Sacco, 1893 + +, considered to be a junior synonym of + +L. steinabrunnensis + +, is the middle +Miocene +( +Badenian +) locality +Grinzing +in +Austria + +. + + + +Studied material. +Holotype +and 3 spec. + +NHMW +1855 + +/0045/0005, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +) + +; + +3 spec. + +NHMW +1857 + +/0014/0007, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +) + +; + +7 spec. + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0049, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1855 + +/0045/0356, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +; + +4 spec. + +NHMW +1847 + +/0046/0003, +Szob +( +Hungary +); 8 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1865 + +/ 0001/0764, +Grinzing +( +Austria +), including specimen illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 5, fig. 5) + +(= +holotype +of + +Conus grinzingensis +Sacco, 1893 + +); 2 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0045, +Grinzing +( +Austria +) + +; + +2 spec. + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0037, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +; + +3 spec. + +NHMW +1870 + +/0054/0038, +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +) + +; + +2 spec. + +NHMW +1860 + +/0001/0067, +Mikulov-Kienberk +( +Czech Republic +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +, +Serravallian +?). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 21 +B1–B3: Grinzing ( +Austria +): SL: +48.8 mm +, MD: +26.4 mm +, +NHMW +1865/0001/ 0 764, specimen illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 5, fig. 5) +(= +holotype +of + +Conus grinzingensis +Sacco, 1893 + +); +Figs 21 +C1–C3: +holotype +, Steinebrunn ( +Austria +): SL: +54.6 mm +, MD: +30.2 mm +, +NHMW +1855/0045/0005; +Figs 21 +D1–D3, 17H: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +54.2 mm +, MD: +28.3 mm +, +NHMW +1854/0035/0037. + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized shells with medium-low conical to slightly coeloconoid spire; spire whorls flat, weakly striate, slowly increasing in width. Last spire whorl often smooth; suture channelled. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl elongate conical, not constricted, usually distinctly angulated, with weak convexity below shoulder, coinciding with position of maximum diameter. Weak spiral grooves may be present on lower third of last whorl. Siphonal canal moderately long, straight or weakly recurved. Aperture moderately narrow, anteriorly widening; siphonal fasciole indistinct, weakly swollen, twisted, well demarcated from narrow inner lip. Colour pattern under UV light consists of large and irregular blotches on the last whorl and flammulae on spire whorls. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +24 adult +specimens: largest specimen: SL: +61.5 mm +, MD: +32.5 mm +, mean SL: +51.8 mm +(σ = 5.5), mean MD: +28.2 mm +(σ = 2.8), spire angle: µ = 101.1° (σ = 8.6°), last whorl angle: µ = 35.3° (σ = 2.1°), LW: µ = 1.8 (σ = 0.08), RD: µ = 0.65 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.88 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.17 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +Hoernes & Auinger (18979) separated several shells from the +Vienna +Basin as variety II based on the slightly more elongate last whorl and the less pronounced angulation. Later, +Sacco (1893b) +introduced the variety name + +grinzingensis + +for these shells, based on the illustration in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 5, fig. 5) +. In the lots assigned to variety II by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +, there is only a single pathologic specimen with a more elongate last whorl, whereas all others do not differ at all from the specimens assigned by them to variety I. Consequently, the morphometric analysis of the measurements and shell ratios as given in Table 1 did not support any separation. Therefore, we consider + +Conus grinzingensis +Sacco, 1893 + +as a subjective junior synonym of + +Lautoconus steinabrunnensis + +. + + +This species was established by +Sacco (1893b) +as variety of his + +Conus conoponderosus + +from the Tortonian of Italy. The Paratethyan species differs from the rather stout + +Lautoconus conoponderosus +(Sacco, 1893) + +in the larger size, more slender outline and the distinct angulation at the shoulder (see syntype of + +L. conoponderosus + +in Ferrero- + +Mortara +et al +. 1984 + +, pl. 18, fig. 10). + + + + + +Lautoconus steinabrunnensis + +is among the most misinterpreted species of the Paratethyan cones. All specimens illustrated as + +Conus steinabrunnensis +in Paratethyan + +literature since +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +seem to be based on misidentifications. For example the specimens described by Kojumdgieva in +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov (1960) +, +Atanacković (1985) +, +Ionesi & Nicorici (1994) +, +Bałuk (1997) +and +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +differ in their much lower spires and the ventricose last whorls and /or the stout last whorls and represent various other species. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Shallow marine environments; at least at Gainfarn, the species was associated with seagrass ( + +Zuschin +et al. +2007 + +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Steinebrunn, Enzesfeld, Gainfarn, Grinzing ( +Austria +), Mikulov-Kienberk ( +Czech Republic +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Sieber 1958b +); + +Eisenstadt- +Sopron +Basin + +: Forchtenau ( +Austria +) ( +Sieber 1958b +); +Carpathian Foredeep +: Bořitov ( +Czech Republic +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +), +Pannonian Basin +: Szob ( +Hungary +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Transylvanian Basin +: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC6FFD5FF5FAEB6FDF24285.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC6FFD5FF5FAEB6FDF24285.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7fd94cec432 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC6FFD5FF5FAEB6FDF24285.xml @@ -0,0 +1,355 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus rotundus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 17 +E, 21A1–A3 + + + + + +[ + +Chelyconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +rotundus + +n. f. +— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +rotundus + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 50 + +, pl. 6, fig. 8. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +rotundus +Hoernes + +et Auinger—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 419, pl. 10, figs 5–6. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +rotundus +Hoernes & Auinger—Strausz 1966: 458 + +, pl. 69, figs 9–10. + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +rotundus +Hoernes & Auinger—Bałuk 1997 + +(partim): 64, pl. 22, figs 4–5 (non 6–8). + + + +Chelyconus rotundus +( +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 +) + +— +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +(partim): 61, figs 17–18 (19?) [non fig. 16 = + +Lautoconus quaggaoides + +nov. sp.]. + + + + +FIGURE 21A1–A3. + +Lautoconus rotundus +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1858/0015/0072, syntype. +21B1–B3. + +Lautoconus steinabrunnensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Grinzing (Austria), NHMW 1865/0001/0764. +21C1–C3. + +Lautoconus steinabrunnensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), holotype, NHMW 1855/0045/0005. +21D1–D3. + +Lautoconus steinabrunnensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/0035/0037. +21E1–E3. + +Lautoconus steindachneri +(Hoernes, 1879) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 1949/0005/0004. +21F1–F3. + +Lautoconus steindachneri +(Hoernes, 1879) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 1997z0178/1179. +21G1–G3. + +Lautoconus subraristriatus + +(Pereira da Costa, 1866), Enzesfeld (Austria), NHMW 1853/0010/0006a. +21H. + +Lautoconus subraristriatus + +(Pereira da Costa, 1866), Enzesfeld (Austria), NHMW A1610. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntypes +: 1 spec. + +NHMW +1858 + +/0015/0072, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 6, fig. 8) + +, 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1853 + +/0003/0003, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +), 3 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1867 + +/0019/ 0 0 0 3, +Coşteiu de Sus +( +Romania +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +(late +Langhian +). + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 17 +E, 21A1–A3: syntype, Steinebrunn (Austria): SL: +42.2 mm +, MD: 25.0 mm, NHMW 1858/0015/0072, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig. 8) +. + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized shells with low conical to weakly cyrtoconoid spire and faintly ventricose last whorl. Early spire pointed, later whorls weakly convex with more or less prominent striae, which may grade into delicate cords on the last whorl. Most prominent spiral cord coincides with angulate shoulder. Deep suture; subsutural flexure of medium depth, strongly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl with spiral cords on lower third; weakly constricted at base with short canal; siphonal fasciole indistinct. No colour pattern preserved. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +Only two adult specimens are available: SL: 42.2/ +34.1 mm +, MD: 25.0/ +20.5 mm +, spire angle: 129/125°, last whorl angle: 36/38°, LW: 1.69/1.66, RD: 0.65/0.69, PMD: 0.90/0.90, RSH: 0.08/ 0.13. + + + + +Discussion. +Hall (1966) +discussed a close relationship between + +Lautoconus rotundus + +and + +L. bitorosus +(Fontannes, 1880) + +, which is larger and lacks a distinct angulation along the shoulder. Some of the specimens identified as + +Conus rotundus + +by +Bałuk (1997, pl. 22, figs 7–8) +differ in their elongate outline, the twisted siphonal fasciole and long siphonal canal and represent another species. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Probably shallow coastal environments based on its occurrence at Gainfarn and Steinebrunn ( + +Zuschin +et al. +2007 + +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Steinebrunn ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Carpathian Foredeep +: Korytnica ( +Poland +) ( +Bałuk 1997 +); Pannonian Basin: Pécsszabolcs, Szob, Letkés ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC8FFD7FF5FAE1BFB7F471D.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC8FFD7FF5FAE1BFB7F471D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c9bf2067456 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC8FFD7FF5FAE1BFB7F471D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,355 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus quaggaoides + +nov. sp. + + + + +Figs 17 +D, 20E1–E3, 20F1–F3, 20G1–G2, 20H1–H3, 20E +1–I +3, 20J + + + + + + +Chelyconus rotundus +( +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 61 + +(partim), fig. 16 [non + +Lautoconus rotundus +( +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + + + +Holotype: +Figs 20 +E1–E3, 17D: SL: +21.5 mm +, MD: +12.9 mm +, NHMW 2016/0009/0001. +Paratype: +Figs 20 +F1–F3: SL: +22.5 mm +, MD: +13.2 mm +, NHMW 2016/0009/0002. +Paratype: +Figs 20 +G1–G2: SL: +24.1 mm +, MD: +14.1 mm +, NHMW 2016/0009/0003. +Paratype: + +Figs +20 + +I1–I3: SL: +24.3 mm +, MD: +15.5 mm +, NHMW 2016/0009/0004a. +Paratype: +Fig. 20 +J: SL: 23.0 mm, MD: +13.4 mm +, NHMW 2016/0009/0004b. + + + +FIGURE 20A1–A3. + +Lautoconus pestensis + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0008/0001, Holotype. +20B1–B3. + +Lautoconus pestensis + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0008/0002, paratype. +20C1–C2. + +Lautoconus pestensis + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0008/0002, paratype. +20D1–D3. + +Lautoconus pestensis + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0008/0004, paratype. +20E1–E3. + +Lautoconus quaggaoides + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0009/0001, holotype. +20F1–F3. + +Lautoconus quaggaoides + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0009/0002, paratype. +20G1–G2. + +Lautoconus quaggaoides + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0009/0003, paratype. +20I1–I3. + +Lautoconus quaggaoides + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0009/0004a, paratype. +20J. + +Lautoconus quaggaoides + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/ 0009/0004b, paratype. +20H1–H3. + +Lautoconus quaggaoides + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), private collection Anton Breitenberger. + + + +Additional material: +5 specimens, NHMW 2016/0009/0004, 2 spec. private collection Anton Breitenberger, +Figs 20 +H1–H3: SL: +31.5 mm +, MD: +19.4 mm +. + + +Type stratum: +fossil-rich marly sand with coral blocks and andesite boulders of the Sámsonháza Formation ( +Császár 1997 +). + + + + +Type +locality: + +Letkés +at the western part of the +Börzsöny Mts. +( +Hungary +); see + +Kovács +& +Vicián +(2013) + +for a map and description. + + + +Age: +Middle Miocene, early Badenian (= Langhian). + + + + +Etymology: +Referring to the zebra-like colour pattern of subadult specimens. + + + + +Description. +Small shells; early spire whorls pointed; later spire whorls nearly flat with moderately incised suture, forming low conical to slightly gradate spire; spire whorls narrowly coiled, last spire whorl relatively broader and faintly striate (only visible in grazing light). Subsutural flexure of medium depth, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Narrowly rounded to weakly subangulate shoulder; position of maximum diameter slightly below shoulder. Last whorl stout and conical to weakly ventricose with faint constriction on base; weak spiral cords on lower third of last whorl. Aperture narrow, angulated at shoulder, nearly straight, only weakly widening towards short and straight siphonal canal; siphonal fasciole nearly absent. Colour pattern very intense under UV light, consisting of frequently interrupted broader fluorescing and narrower dark spirals crossed by broad axial bands, which may be nearly straight to strongly zig-zag shaped within the same specimen. This pattern is dominant in subadult specimens. Axial elements become subordinate in adult shells, which display mainly broad, spirally arranged light and dark dashes. Spire whorls with flammulae. + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 12: largest specimen: SL: +31.5 mm +, MD: +19.4 mm +, mean SL: +24.2 mm +(σ = 3.7), mean MD: +14.6 mm +(σ = 2.4), spire angle: µ = 122.8° (σ = 5.6°), last whorl angle: µ = 41.0° (σ = 1.5°), LW: µ = 1.66 (σ = 0.05), RD: µ = 0.69 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.84 (σ = 0.01), RSH: µ = 0.12 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +This shell probably belongs to the same group as the West African genus + +Africonus +Petuch, 1975 + +as defined by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +. These are all small shelled species, with a short siphonal canal, shallow anal notch, weak siphonal fasciole and rather narrow aperture. Moreover, zig-zag colour patterns are frequently developed within + +Africonus + +(e.g. + +A. decoratus +Röckel, Rolán & Monteiro, 1980 + +, + +A. verdensis +( +Trovão, 1979 +) + +, + +A. derrubado +Rolán & Fernandes in +Rolán, 1990 + +). According to +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +, + +Africonus + +( +type +species: + +Conus cuneolus +Reeve, 1843 + +, by original designation, present day, West Africa) is characterised by having a paucispiral protoconch, the whorl tops may be concave when viewed in cross section, with cords on the whorl tops that may be lost in middle spire whorls or persist thereafter. The shell has a shallow to moderately deep subsutural flexure. The molecular phylogeny presented by + +Puillandre +et al +. (2014a + +, +b +) does not support the separation of + +Africonus + +and + +Lautoconus +Monterosato, 1923 + +. Shells of the genus + +Lautoconus + +are characterised by their turgid shape with convex sides. Like + +Africonus + +, the protoconch is paucispiral. The whorl tops are ornamented with cords that reach the middle spire whorls and often persist and the subsutural flexure is shallow to moderate in depth ( +Tucker & Tenorio 2009 +). On shell characters, alone we cannot convincingly distinguish the two genera and therefore follow + +Puillandre +et al +. (2014a) + +in considering + +Africonus + +a junior synonym of + +Lautoconus + +. + +Aside from its very narrow aperture, this cone snail has few shell features catching the eye at first sight. Therefore, it might have been overlooked so far. Its spectacular colouring under UV light, however, distinguishes it distinctly from all other Paratethyan species and allows an easy identification. + +Paleoenvironment. +The locality Letkés comprises a mixed assemblage of partly reworked taxa ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); the frequent occurrence of corals suggests a shallow marine depositional environment. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Pannonian Basin: +Letkés ( +Hungary +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC8FFD9FF5FA919FD764770.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC8FFD9FF5FA919FD764770.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74e0c673253 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC8FFD9FF5FA919FD764770.xml @@ -0,0 +1,305 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus pseudoponderosus +(Glibert, 1952) + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +pseudoponderosus +Dollfus et Dautzenberg + +mss., nov. sp.— + +Glibert 1952a +: 376 + +, pl. 13, fig. 4. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Rhizoconus +) +ponderosus grinzingensis + +Sacco—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 436, pl. 10, figs 3–4 [non + +Conus grinzingensis +Sacco, 1893 + += + +Lautoconus steinabrunnensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +pseudoponderosus +Dollfus & Dautzenberg (in Glibert, 1952) + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 463 + +, pl. 68, figs 6–7. + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) + +cfr. + +ponderosus +Brocchi—Strausz 1966: 463 + +, pl. 69, fig. 11, pl. 70, fig. 1. + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +pseudoponderosus +Glibert 1952 + +—Bohn-Havas 1973: 1122, pl. 7, fig. 4, pl. 9, fig. 12. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +conoponderosus +Sacco—Kókay 1996: 457 + +, pl. 4, fig. 1 [non + +Lautoconus conoponderosus +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + + +Varioconus conoponderosus +(Sacco, 1893) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 83 + +, fig 111–115 [non + +Lautoconus conoponderosus +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + + + + + +Conus pseudoponderosus +Glibert, 1952 + +— + +Vaessen 2010 +: 12 + +, figs 10C, 15–18 [cum syn.]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +: Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Nr. 10591, Cat. +Types +Invert. tert. +I.R.Sc. +N.B. nr. 2816, Manthelan, +France + +; + +middle Miocene, Langhian; illustrated in +Glibert (1952a, pl. 13, fig. 4) +; +paratypes +: Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Nr. 10591, Cat. +Types +Invert. tert. +I.R.Sc. +N.B. nr. 2817, Bossée, Manthelan, +France +; middle Miocene, Langhian. + + + +Revised description. +Moderately large to large, solid shells with broad conical to weakly cyrtoconoid spire and broad conical last whorl. Spire whorls weakly convex with deep suture, not striate. Subsutural flexure asymmetrically curved, rather shallow. Last whorl with broadly rounded shoulder, rarely slightly angulate. Siphonal fasciole broad, weakly swollen; siphonal canal short, wide, straight. Colour pattern consisting of about 15 spirals of widely-spaced subquadratic and rectangular dots (see Bohn-Havas 1973, pl. 9, fig. 12). + + + + +Discussion. +This species was described by +Glibert (1952a) +from the Langhian of the Loire Basin. Later +Strausz (1966) +and Bohn-Havas (1973) identified this species also in the coeval deposits of the Paratethys. The broad conical outline, rounded shoulder and slightly convex spire whorls allow a clear separation from + +Lautoconus ponderosus + +. Therefore, we consider it a distinct species as proposed also by +Vaessen (2010) +. The internal cast illustrated by +Strausz (1966, pl. 69, fig. 11, pl. 70, fig. 1) +might also represent this species. In our opinion, the Paratethyan records of + +Lautoconus conoponderosus +(Sacco, 1893) + +also represent + +L. pseudoponderosus + +(e.g. +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +, fig. 113, which is a hardly distinguishable from the holotype of + +L. pseudoponderosus + +). Despite the similarity in shape, + +L. conoponderosus + +as defined by +Davoli (1972) +is smaller and more slender. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Shallow marine environments (e.g. Letkés, +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Pannonian Basin: +Várpalota, Bánd, Diósd, Letkés, Szob, +Budapest +: Illés street, Kerepesi street ( +Hungary +). + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +northeastern Atlantic. + +Langhian: +Loire +Basin ( +Glibert 1952a +); Tortonian: Cacela Velha, Cacela Basin ( +Portugal +) ( +Glibert 1952a +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC9FFD9FF5FA9AAFB334076.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC9FFD9FF5FA9AAFB334076.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..71a8b2febbc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFC9FFD9FF5FA9AAFB334076.xml @@ -0,0 +1,452 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus ponderosus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + + + + + +Figs 19 +B1–B3, 19C1–C3 + + + + + + +Conus ponderosus + +nob.— + +Brocchi 1814 +: 293 + +, pl. 3, fig. 1. + + + + +Conus ponderosus +Brocc. + +—Hörnes 1851: 26, pl. 2, figs 6a–b. + + + + +Conus +( +Rhizoconus +) +ponderosus +Brocc. + +— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 38 + +(partim, non figs.). + + + + + +Conus ponderosus +Brocc. F. + + +elmenus +De Greg. + +— + +De Gregorio 1885 +: 369 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus ponderosus +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 2, fig. 6]. + + + + + + + +Conus ponderosus +Brocchi, 1814 + +— + +Krach 1981 +: 77 + +, pl. 20, figs 17–19, 21 [non fig. 20, pl. 21, figs 6–9]. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus) ponderosus +Brocchi, 1814 + +— + +Bałuk 1997 +: 62 + +, pl. 22, fig. 9. + + + + + +Varioconus ponderosus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 87 + +(partim), fig. 139. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +ponderosus +Brocchi, 1814 + +— + +Moisescu 1955a +: 164 + +, pl. 14, figs 10–11. + + + + +non + +Conus ponderosus +Brocc. + +— + +Eremija 1959 +: 187 + +, pl. 1, figs 5-5a [? + +Kalloconus ponderoaustriacus +(Sacco, 1893) + +] + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Lectotype +(following +ICZN +Article 74.6), +Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano +, catalogue number 4674, illustrated in + +Brocchi +(1814, p. 293, pl. 3, fig. 1) + +and +Pinna +& +Spezia +(pl. 18, figs 1-1a), +Parlascio +, +Colle +, +San Geminiano +, +Sogliano +or +Piacentino +( +Italy +), +Pliocene. The +type +locality of + +Conus elmenus +De Gregorio, 1885 + +, considered to be a junior synonym of + +C. ponderosus + +, is the middle +Miocene +locality +Steinebrunn +in +Austria + +. + + + + +Studied +material. + +1 spec. GBA 1856/004/0001/01, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +), illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 2, fig. 6, = +holotype +of + +Conus elmenus +De Gregorio, 1885 + +); 2 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0064, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1860 + +/0001/0051, +Grund +, ( +Austria +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 19 +B1–B3: Steinebrunn (Austria), SL: 70.0 mm, MD: +36.3 mm +: NHMW 1846/0037/ 0064; +Figs 19 +C1–C3: Steinebrunn (Austria): SL: +88 mm +, MD: +49 mm +, GBA 1856/004/0001/01, illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 2, fig. 6). + + +Revised description. +Moderately large shells with low-medium conical to slightly cyrtoconoid spire; incised suture; spire whorls nearly flat or weakly convex, adapically concave; with faint spiral threads. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last spire whorl forming a nearly flat sutural ramp passing via a weakly angulated shoulder on the elongate conical last whorl; position of maximum diameter slightly below angulation. Base slightly constricted with weak spiral grooves; indistinct siphonal fasciole well demarcated from narrow inner lip. Siphonal canal moderately long, somewhat reflected. No colour pattern preserved. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +3 specimens +: SL: 88/71.0/70.0 mm, MD: 49/41.5/ +36.3 mm +, spire angle: 107/ 93/100°, last whorl angle: 35/36/36°, LW: 1.80/1.71/1.93, RD: 0.65/0.74/0.62, PMD: 0.90/0.91/0.91, RSH: 0.15/ 0.21/0.16. + + + + +Discussion. +This species is rather rare in the Paratethyan basins. Only few specimens from Steinebrunn ( +Austria +) agree with Miocene and Pliocene specimens as described by +Hall (1966) +and +Davoli (1972) +. Several additional specimens from +Poland +and +Hungary +described by +Krach (1981) +and +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +might need confirmation. Herein we follow +Hall (1966) +in treating the Paratethyan shells described by Hörnes (1851) as conspecific with + +Conus ponderosus + +. Consequently, we consider + +Conus elmenus + +, which was introduced by +De Gregorio (1885) +as new name for the specimen illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 2, fig. 6), as subjective junior synonym of + +Conus ponderosus +Brocchi, 1814 + +. Nevertheless, the species concept of +Hall (1966) +was too wide and we reject his decision to treat + +Conus olivaeformis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +and + +C. transsylvanicus +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +as synonyms of + +C. ponderosus + +(see discussions of respective species). + + +Paleoenvironment. +Shallow marine environments (e.g. Letkés, +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Steinebrunn ( +Austria +) (Hörnes 1851); +Pannonian Basin +: Letkés ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Carpathian Foredeep +: Korytnica, Węglinek, Łychów ( +Poland +) ( +Bałuk 1997 +). + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +north eastern Atlantic. + +Tortonian (late Miocene): +Po Basin +: Montegibbio ( +Italy +) ( +Davoli 1972 +); Pliocene: + +Po Basin, +Toscana + +( +Italy +) ( +Pinna & Spezia 1978 +; +Chirli 1997 +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFCAFFD8FF5FABD3FD7740E2.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFCAFFD8FF5FABD3FD7740E2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c60ea6d8916 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFCAFFD8FF5FABD3FD7740E2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,255 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus pestensis + +nov. sp. + + + + +Figs 17 +C, 20A1–A3, 20B1–B3, 20C1–C2, 20D1–D3 + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +avellana +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +— +Atanacković 1985 +: 176, pl. 39, fig. 9 [non + +Conus avellana +Lamarck, 1810 + +]. + +Chelyconus miovoeslauensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +— +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 60, figs 11–15 [non + +Lautoconus bitorosus miovoeslauensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +] + + + + +Holotype: +Figs 20A +1 +–A3: SL: +25.2 mm +, MD: +15.2 mm +, NHMW 2016/0008/0001. + + +Paratype: +Figs 20 +B1–B3, 34C: SL: +20.4 mm +, MD: +11.8 mm +, NHMW 2016/0008/0002. + + + + +Paratype: +Figs 20 +C1–C2: SL: +19.2 mm +, MD: +10.7 mm +, NHMW 2016/0008/0002. + + +Paratype: +Figs 20 +D1–D3: SL: +23.6 mm +, MD: +13.1 mm +, NHMW 2016/0008/0004. + + + + + +Additional material: +12 specimens +, + +NHMW +2016 + +/0008/0004, all specimens from +Letkés +, +Hungary +. + + + +Type stratum: +fossil-rich marly sand with coral blocks and andesite boulders of the Sámsonháza Formation ( +Császár 1997 +). + + + + +Type +locality: + +Letkés +at the western part of the +Börzsöny Mts. +( +Hungary +); see + +Kovács +& +Vicián +(2013) + +for a map and description. + + + +Age: +Middle Miocene, early Badenian (= Langhian). + + + + +Etymology: +Referring to +Pest +, the county of the +type +locality Letkés in +Hungary +. + + + + +Description. +Small stout-olivoid shells with low mammillate to weakly cyrtoconoid spire; spire whorls smooth, weakly convex; suture impressed. Last spire whorl relatively broad, passing via rounded shoulder in ventricose last whorl. Subsutural flexure shallow, weakly curved, strongly asymmetrical. Position of maximum diameter in posterior quarter of last whorl; faint constriction at base. Siphonal canal very short, slightly recurved; siphonal fasciole short, twisted, weakly swollen. About 5 deep spiral grooves on base delimitate broad flat spiral cords. Aperture narrow, strongly narrowing posteriorly, slightly widening towards siphonal canal. Very intense colour pattern in UV light consisting of broad spirals of densely spaced subquadratic to weakly rectangular spots; not axially arranged. Slightly axially elongated, prosocline dots on shoulder; additional dots and narrow flammulae on spire whorls. + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 12: largest specimen: SL: +28.5 mm +, MD: +16.4 mm +, mean SL: +22.3 mm +(σ = 2.8), mean MD: +12.9 mm +(σ = 1.7), spire angle: µ = 116.6° (σ = 6.0°), last whorl angle: µ = 37.3° (σ = 1.2°), LW: µ = 1.7 (σ = 0.04), RD: µ = 0.67 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.83 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.13 (σ = 0.00). + + + + +Discussion. +Among the Paratethyan +Conidae +, only + +Lautoconus olivaeformis +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +has a comparable olivoid outline but differs in its higher spire, narrower shape and the colour pattern of broad bands. The specimen from the Badenian of +Bosnia and Herzegovina +illustrated by +Atanacković (1985, pl. 39, fig. 9) +might represent this species as well, although it is more barrel-shaped. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The locality Letkés comprises a mixed assemblage of partly reworked taxa ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); the frequent occurrence of corals suggests a shallow marine depositional environment. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Pannonian Basin: +Letkés ( +Hungary +);? southern Pannonian Basin: Hrvaćani ( +Bosnia and Herzegovina +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFCCFFDBFF5FACDAFA844237.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFCCFFDBFF5FACDAFA844237.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..95b6711df4d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFCCFFDBFF5FACDAFA844237.xml @@ -0,0 +1,622 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus pelagicus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + + + + + +Figs 17 +J, 19A1–A4 + + + + + + +Conus pelagicus + +nob.— + +Brocchi 1814 +: 289 + +, pl. 2, fig. 9. + + + + +[ + +Chelyconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Mariae + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + +C. +[ +onus +] + +Mariae + +— +Hoernes 1878b +: 207 (nomen nudum). + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Mariae + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 49 + +, pl. 6, fig. 7. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +vindobonensis +var. +mariae + +( +Hoernes und Auinger 1879 +)—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 213 + +, pl. 50, fig. 6. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +mariae +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 150 + +, pl. 37, figs 17a–b. + + + + + +Conus vindobonensis mariae +(Hoernes et Auinger) + +— + +Ionesi & Nicorici 1994 +: 62 + +, pl. 5, fig. 8. + + + + + +Varioconus pelagicus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +— + + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +: 247 + +, pl. 39, figs 6–7, pl. 41, fig. 14, pl. 42, fig. 8, pl. 82, figs 1–2. + + + + + +Varioconus pelagicus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 87 + +, figs 131–137. + + + +non + +Conus pelagicus +Brocc. + +—Hörnes 1851: 31, pl. 3, figs 4a–d [= + +Lautoconus ventricosus +( +Gmelin, 1791 +) + +]. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Lectotype +(following +ICZN +Article 74.6) stored in the +Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano +, Catalogue number 4668, Piacentino, +Italy +, Pliocene; illustrated in +Pinna & Spezia (1978; pl. 18, fig. 4) +. + + + +The type locality of + +Conus mariae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, which is considered to be a junior synonym of + +C. pelagicus + +, is the middle Miocene locality Bujtur in Romania. + + + +Studied material. +1 spec. + +NHMW +1861 + +/0035/0004, +Bujtur +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 6, fig. 7) + +; 2 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1868 + +/0001/0387, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +. + + + + +Illustrated +material + +. + +Figs +19A + +1 +–A4, 17J: +Bujtur +( +Romania +): SL: +53.6 mm +, MD: +24.9 mm +, + +NHMW +1861 + +/0035/ 0 0 0 4, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig. 7) +. + + + + +FIGURE 19A1–A4. + +Lautoconus pelagicus +(Brocchi, 1814) + +, Bujtur (Romania), NHMW 1861/0035/0004. +19B1–B3 +. + +Lautoconus ponderosus +(Brocchi, 1814) + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1846/0037/0064. +19C1–C3. + +Lautoconus ponderosus +(Brocchi, 1814) + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), GBA 1856/004/0001/01. + + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized, biconical, solid, glossy shells with high conical spire; early spire whorls probably tuberculate; spire whorls flat to weakly convex, not striate; suture narrow but deeply impressed, almost canaliculated. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical; last spire whorl weakly concave; indistinct angulation on shoulder; last whorl slightly ventricose, constricted at base. No spiral sculpture except for several spiral cords on base. Aperture moderately narrow. Siphonal fasciole strongly swollen, convex, twisted; inner lip narrow, straight; siphonal canal moderately long, reflected. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of flammulae on shoulder and spire and irregularly spaced short dashes on the entire last whorl, forming three broad bands separated by two fluorescing bands. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. Three specimens are available: largest specimen SL: +57.6 mm +, MD: +28.2 mm +, spire angle: 82/85/83°, last whorl angle: 33/35/32, LW: 2.04/2.09/2.15, RD: 0.59/0.59/0.56, PMD: 0.86/0.88/ 0.91, RSH: 0.17/0.18/0.17; spire angle: 95°, last whorl angle: 37°; second specimen: SL: +50.4 mm +, MD: +25.2 mm +, LW: 2.0, RD: 0.64, PMD: 0.85, RSH: 0.22. + + + + +Discussion. +Differs from the somewhat similar + +Conus + +s.l. + +posticestriatus +(Kojumdgieva in +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +) + +by the absence of any spiral grooves on the spire whorls, the constricted base and the reflected siphonal canal. Hall (1894) and + +Landau +et al +. (2013) + +synonymized + +Conus mariae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +with + +Lautoconus pelagicus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +, which is followed herein. + + + + + +Lautoconus pelagicus + +was also reported from the +Vienna +Basin by Hörnes (1851, pl. 3, fig. 4). Later, +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +recognized this specimen as a recent + +Conus mediterraneus +Hwass in +Bruguière, 1792 + +[= + +Lautoconus ventricosus +( +Gmelin, 1791 +) + +]. Although +Sacco (1893b) +was aware of that statement by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +, he doubted that the question was solved and introduced + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +pelagicus incertula + +as new variation name. The specimen is still stored in the GBA collection (GBA 1856/0004/0002). Preservation and colour pattern reveal this specimen as a Recent shell, as supposed by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +; moreover, the preservation mode differs completely from the fossil shells from Baden, which is given as the locality on the label. Consequently, + +Conus incertula +Sacco, 1893b + +is +a +subjective junior synonym of + +Lautoconus ventricosus + +. + + +The species was discussed again by +Hall (1966) +by synonymising also + +Plagioconus +lapugyensis + +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) with + +Lautoconus pelagicus + +. In addition, +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +and + +Landau +et al +. (2013) + +treated + +Conus suessi +Hoernes & Auinger (2013) + +as a junior synonym of + +L. pelagicus + +. Both synonymizations are rejected herein [see discussions on + +Plagioconus +lapugyensis + +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) and + +Leporiconus suessi +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + + +Paleoenvironment. +The occurrences in the Turkish Karman Basin suggest shallow marine environments. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn ( +Austria +), Mikulov- Kienberk, Hrušovany ( +Czech Republic +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin: +Forchtenau ( +Austria +) ( +Sieber 1956 +); +Pannonian Basin: +Letkés ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Transylvanian Basin +: Lăpugiu de Sus, Bujtur ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); + +Buzău +Basin + +: Valea Muscel ( +Romania +) ( +Ionesi & Nicorici 1994 +); +Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: +Calvei ( +Romania +) ( +Hinculov 1968 +); +Dacian Basin: +Opanec ( +Bulgaria +) ( +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +). + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +north eastern Atlantic. + +Burdigalian (early Miocene): Turin Hills ( +Italy +) + +; + +Langhian (middle Miocene): +Aquitaine +Basin ( +France +) + +; + +Serravallian (middle Miocene): +Karaman +Basin ( +Turkey +) + +; Tortonian (late Miocene): Po Basin (Italy); + +early Pliocene: +western Mediterranean +, Estepona Basin ( +Spain +), +central Mediterranean +( +Italy +) + +; + +late Pliocene: +central Mediterranean +( +Italy +) (see + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +for details). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD0FFDDFF5FAD53FCFA4532.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD0FFDDFF5FAD53FCFA4532.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a0b165d0ab1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD0FFDDFF5FAD53FCFA4532.xml @@ -0,0 +1,844 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus miovoeslauensis +(Sacco, 1893) + + + + + +Figs 17 +B, 18D1–D3, 18E1–E3, 18F1–F2 + + + + + +Conus ventricosus +Bronn—Hörnes 1851: 32 + +(partim), pl. 3, figs 6a–c [non + +Lautoconus ventricosus +( +Gmelin, 1791 +) + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +ventricosus +Bronn—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 49 + + +, pl. 6, fig. 6 [non + +Lautoconus ventricosus +( +Gmelin, 1791 +) + +]. + + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Chelyconus) tauroventricosus + +] + +var. +miovoeslauensis +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 108 + +(nov. nom. pro + +Conus ventricosus +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 6, fig. 6). + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +ventricosus +Bronn—Schaffer 1908: 98 + +, pl. 10, fig. 15 [non + +Lautoconus ventricosus +( +Gmelin, 1791 +) + +]. + + + +Conus ventricosus +Brocc. + +—Friedberg 1911: 60, pl. 3, fig. 4 [non + +Lautoconus ventricosus +( +Gmelin, 1791 +) + +]. + + + +Chelyconus bitorosus +Font. var. +exventricosa +Sacco—Schaffer 1912: 133 + +, pl. 49, fig. 4 (non figs 5–6). + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +bitorosus exventricosus +Sacco, 1893 + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 150 + +, pl. 38, figs 1a–b [non + +Lautoconus exventricosus +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + + + + + +Lautoconus bitorosus +(Fontannes, 1880) + +— + + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +: 239 + +, pl. 38, figs 2–4, pl. 41, fig. 9, pl. 42, fig. 3, pl. 81, fig. 3. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +miovoeslauensis +Sacco, 1893 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 457 + +, text-fig. 204. + + + + + + +non + +Conus ventricosus +Bronn—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 1, figs 1a–b, 4 a–b. + + + +non + +Chelyconus miovoeslauensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +— +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 60, figs 11–15 [= + +Lautoconus pestensis + +nov. sp.]. non + +Monteiroconus bitorosus +( +Fontannes, 1879 +) + +— +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 76, figs 5–6, 82–86. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype + +NHMW +1849 + +/0023/0003, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 6, fig. 6) + +; middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material. +Holotype +and 10 spec. + +NHMW +1855 + +/0045/0857, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1937 + +/0002/0272, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +), illustrated in + +Schaffer +(1908, pl. 10, fig. 15) + +; 4 spec + +. + + +NHMW +2010 + +/0004/ 1459a-b +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +) + +; + +7 spec. + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0060, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +) + +; + +17 spec. + +NHMW +1846 + +/ 0037/0062, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +) + +; + +7 spec. + +NHMW +1863 + +/0015/0398, +Forchtenau +( +Austria +) + +; + +9 spec. + +NHMW +1870 + +/ 0033/0003, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 18 +D1–D3: +holotype +, Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +): SL: +51.3 mm +, MD: +34.5 mm +, +NHMW +1849/0023/0003, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig. 6) +; +Figs 18 +E1–E3: Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +): SL: +65.7 mm +, MD: +40.9 mm +, +NHMW +2010/0004/1459a; +Figs 18 +F1–F3: Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +): SL: +50.3 mm +, MD: +30.8 mm +, +NHMW +2010/0004/1459b; +Fig. 17 +B: Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +): SL: +42.6 mm +, MD: +25.6 mm +, +NHMW +1855/ 0045/0855. + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized shells, spire coeloconoid, low to medium in height; very variable in height; spire whorls channelled, weakly striate to striate; more or less deep groove in mid-whorl. Subsutural flexure of medium depth, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical; last whorl elongate and fig-shaped, rarely strongly ventricose. Shoulder high, rounded, sides convex, position of maximum diameter about ¼ of the way below the shoulder; very weakly constricted at base; bearing weak spiral grooves on the abapical third; aperture straight, widening and slightly flared abapically; siphonal canal short; siphonal fasciole weakly developed; colour pattern seen under UV light consisting of spirally arranged small irregular dashes, partly underlain by very thin spirals. Broad, wide-spaced flammulae on shoulder and last spire whorl. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +17 adult +specimens (only large morphs): largest specimen: SL: +65.7 mm +, MD: +40.9 mm +, mean SL: +51.2 mm +(σ = 5.1), mean MD: +30.4 mm +(σ = 3.6), spire angle: µ = 121.9° (σ = 8.6°), last whorl angle: µ = 38.7° (σ = 1.5°), LW: µ = 1.69 (σ = 0.08), RD: µ = 0.68 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.86 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.12 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +Sacco (1893b) +considered the Miocene specimen illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 3, fig. 6) as + +Conus ventricosus + +to be conspecific with the Pliocene species + +Conus exventricosus +Sacco, 1893 + +. He referred to the specimen as a typical representative, which could be read as designation as +type +specimen. Unfortunately, this specimen is lost. Later, +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig. 6) +illustrated another specimen from Bad Vöslau as + +Conus ventricosus + +. Their selection was somewhat unfortunate as +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +illustrated an atypical low spired and broad specimen. Therefore, +Sacco (1893b) +introduced the varietal name + +miovoeslauensis + +for this specimen. The middle Miocene specimens from the Paratethys, like the Serravallian + + + +FIGURE 17. +Oblique views of selected specimens. +17A +. + +Lautoconus magnolapugyensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1870/0033/0002. +17B. + +Lautoconus miovoeslauensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 1855/ 0045/0855. +17C. + +Lautoconus pestensis + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0008/0002, paratype. +17D. + +Lautoconus quaggaoides + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary),NHMW 2016/0009/0001, holotype. +17E. + +Lautoconus rotundus +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Steinebrunn (Austria), NHMW 1858/0015/0072, syntype. +Fig. 17F. + +Lautoconus steindachneri +(Hoernes, 1879) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 1855/0045/0858. +17G. + +Lautoconus + +nov. sp. [ex. gr. + +bitorosus +Fontannes, 1880 + +], Letkés (Hungary), private collection Anton Breitenberger (Bad Vöslau, Austria). +17H. + +Lautoconus steinabrunnensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/0035/0037. +17I. + +Lautoconus subraristriatus + +(Pereira da Costa, 1866), Enzesfeld (Austria), NHMW 1853/0010/0006b. +17J. + +Lautoconus pelagicus +(Brocchi, 1814) + +, Bujtur (Romania), NHMW 1861/0035/0004. +17K. + +Leporiconus paratethyianus + +nov. sp., Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0005/0001, holotype. +17L. + +Leporiconus suessi +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania). NHMW A457a. +17M. + +Leporiconus transsylvanicus +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/0035/0034a, syntype. +17N. + +Monteiroconus antiquus +(Lamarck, 1810) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1970/1396/1486. +17O. + +Monteiroconus boeckhi +(Halaváts, 1884) + +, Ritzing (Austria), NHMW 1930/0006/ 0 0 37. +17P. + +Monteiroconus conicomaculatus +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Mikulov-Kienberk (Czech Republic), NHMW 1860/0001/00054. +17Q. + +Monteiroconus daciae +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Ritzing (Austria). NHMW 1930/0006/0034. +17R. + +Monteiroconus girondicus +(Peyrot, 1931) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 2010/0004/1569a. +17S. + +Monteiroconus hoernesi +(Doderlein, 1863) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1856/0050/0110. +17T. + +Monteiroconus mojsvari +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Pötzleinsdorf (Austria), NHMW 1847/0037/0024. +17U. + +Monteiroconus neugeboreni +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1949/0005/0001. +17V. + +Monteiroconus supracompressus +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Mikulov (Czech Republic), NHMW 2016/ 0034/0001. +17W. + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +, Bujtur (Romania), NHMW 1861/0033/0002. +34X. + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus + +(Hörnes, 1851. Bujtur (Romania), NHMW 1836/0012/0108b. + + + + +FIGURE 18A1–A3. + +Lautoconus magnolapugyensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 2016/0001/0002. +18B1– B3. + +Lautoconus magnolapugyensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 2016/0001/0001, holotype. +18C1–C2. + +Lautoconus magnolapugyensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1870/0033/0002. +18D1–D3 +. + +Lautoconus miovoeslauensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 1849/0023/0003, holotype. +18E1–E3. + +Lautoconus miovoeslauensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 2010/0004/1459a. +18F1–F3 +. + +Lautoconus miovoeslauensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 2010/0004/1459b. + + + +specimens from the Turkish Karman Basin described by + +Landau +et al +. (2013) + +, differ from the Pliocene + +Lautoconus bitorosus + +in their lower spires and more elongate shapes (see also + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +). Therefore, it might be justified to separate the Miocene specimens as + +Lautoconus miovoeslauensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +. + + +This name was overlooked by +Sieber (1958a) +in his synthesis on Miocene gastropods of the +Vienna +Basin but was used by authors such as +Strausz (1966) +and +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +. Unfortunately, the specimen illustrated by +Strausz (1966, text-fig. 204) +has a very broad last whorl and is not conspecific with + +L. miovoeslauensis + +. Similarly, the ovoid shells from Letkés in +Hungary +illustrated by +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +seem to represent a different species. The Italian specimen described by +Sacco (1893b) +as + +Conus exventricosus + +differs from the Paratethyan species in its rounded shoulder, the lower position of the maximum diameter and the more pronounced constriction of the base. +Hall (1966) +treated + +Conus miovoeslauensis + +as conspecific with + +Conus magnolapugyensis + +and both as synonyms of + +Lautoconus bitorosus +(Fontannes, 1880) + +. + +Lautoconus miovoeslauensis + +differs from + +L. magnolapugyensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +as redescribed herein in its smaller size, narrower and striate spire whorls, the distinct spiral threads on the base and the overall distinctly more slender outline. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The pelitic sediment infill suggests offshore environments at least for specimens from Bad Vöslau; other localities, such as Steinebrunn, represent nearshore environments. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Bad Vöslau, Baden, Steinebrunn ( +Austria +); +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin +: Mattersburg, Forchtenau ( +Austria +); +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Grund ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Sieber 1949 +, +1956 +, +1958b +), Korytnica ( +Poland +) (Friedberg 1911), +Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: +Valea Bela Reca ( +Romania +) ( +Hinculov 1968 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +). + + +The record of an early Miocene occurrence from Mörtersdorf (Austria) of Lower Austria mentioned by Schaffer (1910) and Mandic & Steiniger (2003) is based on poorly preserved specimens, which are almost certainly misidentified; note that the specimen illustrated by +Schaffer (1912, pl. 49, fig. 4) +derives from Bad Vöslau and is of middle Miocene age. + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and northeastern Atlantic. +Serravallian (middle Miocene): Karaman Basin (Turkey) ( + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +). See + +Landau +et al +. (2013) + +for a detailed list of early Miocene to early Pleistocene occurrences of the closely related + +L. bitorosus +(Fontannes, 1880) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD1FFC1FF5FAEABFB7545A4.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD1FFC1FF5FAEABFB7545A4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..328654f068b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD1FFC1FF5FAEABFB7545A4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,277 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus magnolapugyensis +(Sacco, 1893) + + + + + +Figs 17 +A, 18A1–A3, 18B1–B3, 18C1–C2 + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +ventricosus +Bronn—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 49 + + +, pl. 1, figs 6–7, pl. 6, fig. 5 (same specimen as pl. 1 fig. 7) [non + +Lautoconus ventricosus +( +Gmelin, 1791 +) + +]. + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] +C. +[ +helyconus +] + +tauroventricosus + +? + +var. +magnolapugyensis +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 108 + +(nov. nom. pro + +Conus ventricosus +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 6, fig. 5). + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype + +NHMW +2016 + +/0001/0001, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 6, fig. 5) + +. + + + +Studied material. +Holotype and 1 spec. NHMW 2016/0001/0002, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 6) +, 1 spec. + + +NHMW +1870 + +/0033/0002, all +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 18A +1 +–A3: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +65.5 mm +, MD: +45.1 mm +, +NHMW +2016/ 0001/0002, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 7) +; +Figs 18 +B1–B3: +holotype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +68.2 mm +, MD: 44.0 mm, +NHMW +2016/0001/0001, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 6) +; +Figs 18 +C1–C2, 17A: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +), SL: 59.3, MD: +38.4 mm +, +NHMW +1870/0033/0002. + + +Revised description. +Moderately large, solid shells with low spire and stout, ventricose, quickly contracting last whorl. Early spire whorls eroded in all specimens; later spire whorls concave with bulgy abapical convexity, faintly striate; suture narrow, shallow. Subsutural flexure deep, strongly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl with prominent, rounded shoulder; position of maximum diameter slightly below; weakly constricted at base. Faint spiral sculpture on base. Siphonal fasciole narrow, slightly swollen, twisted; siphonal canal short and wide. Aperture moderately wide, broadening towards siphonal canal. Colour pattern consisting of strong flammulae on spire whorls and shoulder and densely spaced delicate spirally arranged dashes on last whorl. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +Only three specimens are available: SL: 68.2/65.5/ +59.3 mm +, MD: 44.0/45.1/ +38.4 mm +, spire angle: 132/141/130°, last whorl angle: 42/45/44°, LW: 1.55/1.45/1.54, RD: 0.71/0.74/0.77, PMD: 0.86/0.87/0.97, RSH: 0.10/0.07/0.16. + + + + +Discussion. +This species is characterised by its stout ventricose outline and dense colour pattern and cannot be confused with any other Paratethyan species. +Sacco (1893b) +introduced this taxon with a question mark as variety of + +Conus tauroventricosus +Sacco, 1893 + +from the Burdigalian of the Turin Hills. +Hall (1966) +treated this species and the varietal name + +magnolapugyensis + +as synonym of + +Lautoconus bitorosus +(Fontannes, 1880) + +. + +Conus tauroventricosus + +, which is most probably unrelated to + +L. bitorosus + +, differs from the Paratethyan species in its figshaped outline and more rounded shoulder. + +Lautoconus bitorosus + +is similar concerning its ventricose last whorl but has a higher spire and the last whorl is more cylindrical-conical (see +Muñiz-Solís 1999 +). + + +Paleoenvironment. +The sandy sediment preserved in the shells suggests a shallow marine environment. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Transylvanian Basin +: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +). The record from the Burdigalian of the Turin Hills mentioned by +Sacco (1893b) +needs confirmation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD3FFC0FF5FADFBFE3E47EC.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD3FFC0FF5FADFBFE3E47EC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a9787a5f6aa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD3FFC0FF5FADFBFE3E47EC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,346 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus kovacsi + +nov. sp. + + + + +Figs 3 +W, 16E1–E3, 16F1–F3, 16G1–G2, + +Figs +16 + +I1–I3 + + + + + + +Varioconus taurinensis +( +Bellardi et Michelotti, 1840 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 88 + +, fig 143–148 [non + +Lautoconus taurinensis +( +Bellardi & Michelotti, 1840 +) + +]. + + + + + +Holotype: +Figs 16 +E1–E3: SL: +19.8 mm +, MD: +11.4 mm +, NHMW 2016/0003/0001. +Paratype: +Figs 16 +F1–F3: SL: +18.8 mm +, MD: +11.8 mm +, NHMW 2016/0003/0003. +Paratype: +Figs 16 +G1–G2: SL: +20.1 mm +, MD: +12.1 mm +, NHMW 2016/0003/0002. +Paratype: +Figs 16 +H1–H3: SL: +18.7 mm +, MD: +11.7 mm +, NHMW 2016/0003/0004a. +Paratype: + +Figs +16 + +I1–I3: SL: +17.2 mm +, MD: 10.0 mm, NHMW 2016/0003/0004a. +Additional material. +7 specimens NHMW 2016/0003/0004, +Fig. 3 +W: SL: +18.3 mm +, MD: +10.6 mm +, all + +specimens from Letkés, Hungary. + + +FIGURE 16A1–A2. + +Lautoconus eschewegi + +(Pereira da Costa, 1866), Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1858/0043/0007. +16B1–B2. + +Lautoconus eschewegi + +(Pereira da Costa, 1866), Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1858/0043/0007. +16C1–C2. + +Lautoconus eschewegi + +(Pereira da Costa, 1866), Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0007/0001b. +16D1–D2. + +Lautoconus eschewegi + +(Pereira da Costa, 1866), Letkés (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0007/0001a. +16E1–E3. + +Lautoconus kovacsi + +nov. sp., Letkés, (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0003/0001, holotype. +16F1–F3. + +Lautoconus kovacsi + +nov. sp., Letkés, (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0003/ 0 0 0 3, paratype. +16G1–G2. + +Lautoconus kovacsi + +nov. sp., Letkés, (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0003/0002, paratype. +16H1–H3. + +Lautoconus kovacsi + +nov. sp., Letkés, (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0003/0004a, paratype. +16I1–I3. + +Lautoconus kovacsi + +nov. sp., Letkés, (Hungary), NHMW 2016/0003/0004a, paratype. + + + +Type stratum. +fossil-rich marly sand with coral blocks and andesite boulders of the Sámsonháza Formation ( +Császár 1997 +). + + + + +Type +locality. + +Letkés +at the western part of the +Börzsöny Mts. +( +Hungary +); see + +Kovács +& +Vicián +(2013) + +for a map and description. + + + +Age: +Middle Miocene, early Badenian (= Langhian). + + + + +Etymology. +In honour of Zoltán Kovács (Franz Liszt Academy of Music, +Budapest +), who published the milestone paper “ +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +” on the Badenian +Conidae +from Letkés. + + + + +Description: +Small, globose shells with mammillate, moderately high spires and convex last whorls. Early spire whorls pointed but usually eroded; later spire whorls faintly striate to smooth, weakly to strongly convex, partly bulgy, forming conical to cyrtoconoid, gradate spire; suture deeply incised, not channelled. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl with weakly angulated shoulder, position of maximum diameter slightly below shoulder. Inflated to cylindrical below shoulder and rapidly contracting in lower half of shell. Strongly constricted at base separating a comparatively narrow and moderately long, weakly recurved siphonal canal. Few spiral cords on base; faint spiral cords may appear on entire last whorl. Siphonal fasciole nearly absent. Colour pattern very strong in UV light, consisting of four broad bands of partly amalgamated and partly well separated blotches; first one closely below shoulder, second one slightly above midwhorl, third one below mid-whorl above constriction, fourth one on base and siphonal channel. Blotches of the uppermost band continue as narrower flammulae on the last spire whorl; additional wide-spaced flammulae on spire whorls. + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 11: largest specimen: SL: +20.3 mm +, MD: +12.9 mm +, mean SL: +18.6 mm +(σ = 1.4), mean MD: +11.4 mm +(σ = 0.9), spire angle: µ = 102° (σ = 8.2), last whorl angle: µ = 42.3° (σ = 3.0), LW: µ = 1.64 (σ = 0.09), RD: µ = 0.74 (σ = 0.06), PMD: µ = 0.80 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.17 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +This is a very peculiar small cone, which is characterised by its globose, columbellid shape unknown from any other Paratethyan species. It is reminiscent of some species of the Indo-West Pacific genus + +Pseudolilliconus +Tucker & Tenorio, 2009 + +, such as + +Pseudolilliconus traillii +(Adams, 1855) + +and + +Pseudolilliconus wallacei +( +Lorenz & Morrison, 2004 +) + +, but the much larger size of the Paratethyan species makes a direct relation with this tiny cone genus unlikely. This strange species was identified by +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +as + +Varioconus taurinensis +( +Bellardi & Michelotti, 1840 +) + +, which develops also a weakly gradate spire but differs in its elongate and straight-sided last whorl (see + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +and references therein). + +Artemidiconus dertogranularis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, from the Tortonian of Stazzano in +Italy +, is slightly similar in shape and size but differs in its typical midwhorl groove on the spire whorls. + + +This species is known so far only from Letkés. A non-Paratethyan occurrence, however, might be represented by the specimen illustrated in +Peyrot (1931, pl. 2, fig. 11) +as + +Conus mucronatolaevis globospira +(Sacco) + +from the Langhian of Salies-de-Béarn in the +Aquitaine +Basin. + +Conus globospira +Sacco, 1893 + +, from the Burdigalian of the Turin Hills, differs clearly in its much more elongate last whorl. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The locality Letkés comprises a mixed assemblage of partly reworked taxa ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); the frequent occurrence of corals suggests a shallow marine depositional environment. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Pannonian Basin: +Letkés ( +Hungary +). + + + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and +north eastern Atlantic. + +? Langhian (middle Miocene): + +Aquitaine +Basin + +: Salies-de-Béarn ( +France +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD4FFC2FF5FA924FF56445C.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD4FFC2FF5FA924FF56445C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6f4654d3acf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD4FFC2FF5FA924FF56445C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,644 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus eschewegi + +(Pereira da +Costa, 1866 +) + + + + + +Figs +3 + +V, 16A1–A2,16B1–B3, 16C1–C2, 16D1–D2 + + + + + + +Conus Eschewegi +Costa—Pereira + +da + +Costa 1866 +: 29 + +, pl. 9, figs 18, 19a–b, 21, 23a–b [non figs 20, 22, 34]. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +subraristriatus +da Costa—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 23 + + +(partim), pl. 1, fig. 20 [non + +Lautoconus subraristriatus + +(Pereira da +Costa, 1866 +)]. + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] +D. +[ +endroconus +] + +Eschewegi + + +var. +caelata +(Dod. Sacc.) + +— + +Sacco 1893a +: 13 + +, pl. 1, fig. 24. + + + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] +D. +[ +endroconus +] + +Eschewegi + + +var. +depressoastensis +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893a +: 13 + +, pl. 1, fig. 25. + + + + + +Dendroconus pyruloides +(Dod. Sacc.) + +— + +Sacco 1893a +: 13 + +, pl. 1, fig. 26. + + + + + +Dendroconus + +cf. + +Eschewegi +Da + +Cost. + +var. +caelata +Dod., Sacc. + +— + +Szalay 1926 +: 334 + +. + + + + + + +Conus eschewegi +Da Costa—Davoli 1972: 107 + +, pl. 6, figs 1–16. + + + +Dendroconus pyruloides +Sacco, 1893 + +, Doderlein in schedis—Ferrero-Mortara +et al +. 1984: 102, pl. 15, figs 9a–b, pl. 16, figs 7a– b. + + + + +Conus eschewegi +Da Costa—Ruggieri & + +Davoli 1984 +: 72 + + +, pl. 5, figs 19a–b, 22a–b. + + + + +Conus eschewegi +Da Costa—Davoli 2003: 451 + +, pl. 1, fig. 14. + + + +? + +Conus eschewegi + +(P. da +Costa, 1866 +)— + +Gonçalves & Monteiro 2012 +: 32 + +, unnumbered fig page 35. + + + + + +Lautoconus belus +(d’Orbigny, 1852) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 68 + +, figs 4, 53–55 [non + +Lautoconus belus +(d’Orbigny 1852) + +]. + + + + + + + +Lautoconus eschewegi + +(da Costa)— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 70 + +, figs 7, 56–61. + + + + + + + +Lautoconus pyrula +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 71 + +, figs 7, 62–65 [non + +Lautoconus pyrula +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Specimens illustrated in Pereira da + +Costa +(1866 + +, pl. 9, figs 23a–b, selected as +lectotype +proposed by +Sacco (1893a) +; Tortonian, Cacela Basin, +Portugal +. The whereabouts of the collection are unknown to us. + + + + +Studied material. +7 spec. + +NHMW +1858 + +/0043/0007, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), including specimen illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, fig. 20) + +, 7 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0035, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), 1 spec +NHMW +A1609, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +; + +11 spec. + +NHMW +2016 + +/0007/0001, +Letkés +( +Hungary +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 16A +1 +–A2,: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +), SL: +39.9 mm +, MD: +22.9 mm +, +NHMW +1858/ 0043/0007; +Figs 16 +B1–B2, +3V +: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +), SL: +42.8 mm +, MD: +23.8 mm +, +NHMW +1858/0043/0007, specimen illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 20) +; +Figs 16 +C1–C2: Letkés ( +Hungary +), SL: +32.6 mm +, MD: +18.7 mm +, +NHMW +2016/0007/0001b; +Figs 16 +D1–D2: Letkés ( +Hungary +), SL: +39.6 mm +, MD: +23.2 mm +, +NHMW +2016/0007/0001a. + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized, pyriform shells; extraordinarily pointed, turreted early spire (but poorly preserved in all specimens); later spire low conical to cyrtoconoid with channelled suture; spiral whorls slightly convex; subsutural flexure very shallow, weakly curved, moderately asymmetrical; shoulder strongly rounded, slightly subangulate in fully grown shells. Last whorl elongate and conical, constricted at base. Moderately long, broad and reflected siphonal canal; aperture moderately wide, slightly widening anteriorly. Siphonal fasciole swollen, strongly twisted, not well demarcated from base and straight, broad inner lip. Few wavy spiral grooves on base demarcating broad spiral cords. Colour pattern consisting of slightly irregularly spaced spirals formed by short dashes and subquadratic dots; size of dots rather homogenous within a spiral but may vary in size and density between spirals; sometimes two spirals form a close-spaced pair with nearly amalgamating dots. Dots become axially elongate on shoulder, rarely forming an inverted “Y”; narrow axially elongated stripes on spire whorls. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 7: largest specimen: SL: +42.8 mm +, MD: +23.8 mm +, mean SL: +37.4 mm +(σ = 3.5), mean MD: +20.8 mm +(σ = 2.1), spire angle: µ = 113.3° (σ = 8.6°), last whorl angle: µ = 37.0° (σ = 1.4°), LW: µ = 1.8 (σ = 0.04), RD: µ = 0.63 (σ = 0.01), PMD: µ = 0.86 (σ = 0.01), RSH: µ = 0.12 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +proposed a placement of this species in + +Lautoconus +Monterosato, 1923 + +. The completely smooth spire whorls, which lack any sculpture even on earliest teleoconch whorls and the mode of siphonal canal formation would perfectly fit in + +Varioconus +da +Motta, 1991 + +, which however is currently considered to be a junior synonym of + +Lautoconus + +( + +Puillandre +et al +. 2014a + +, +b +). + + +Hoernes & Auinger (1979) illustrated three shells as “ + +Dendroconus subraristriatus + +”, which represent three different species, of which none is conspecific with + +Lautoconus subraristriatus + +(Pereira da + +Costa +, 1866 + +). The reason for uniting these different morphologies in a single species was the superficial similarity in colour patterns and the also much too broad species concept of Pereira da + +Costa +(1866) + +(see + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +and discussion of + +Lautoconus subraristriatus + +). + + +The original description of + +Lautoconus eschewegi + +(Pereira da + +Costa +, 1866 + +) united several morphotypes, which are most probably not conspecific. Therefore, +Sacco (1893a) +designated the slender, pyriform specimen illustrated by Pereira da + +Costa +(1866, fig. 23) + +as +type +of this species. This species was also described as + +Conus pyruloides +Sacco, 1893 + +, from the late Miocene of +Italy +, which was considered to be a junior synonym of + +L. eschewegi + +by +Hall (1966) +and +Davoli (1972) +. In the material from Letkés in the collection of the NHMW, this species is easily recognised under UV light by its conspicuous and intense colour pattern. This also allows the identification of subadult shells, which have a weaker siphonal fasciole, shorter siphonal canal and an evenly rounded shoulder. Therefore, we consider the specimens identified by +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +as + +Lautoconus belus +(d’Orbigny, 1852) + +and + +L. pyrula +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +to represent different morphotypes and growth stages of + +L. eschewegi + +. Moreover, + +Lautoconus belus +sensu +Hall (1966, pl. 22, figs 15–16) + +and +Muñiz-Solís (1999, figs 7A–B) +differs from the Paratethyan species in its broader outline, better defined shoulder and the conspicuous spiral sculpture on the last whorl and + +L. pyrula + +has a strong spiral sculpture on the base, a much weaker fasciole and a well-defined shoulder. + + +Muñiz-Solís (1999) +described + +Conus eschewegi + +from the lower upper Pliocene of Estepona. These specimens develop a comparatively broad conical last whorl and are most probably not conspecific with + +L. eschewegi + +. The superficially similar + +Kalloconus fuscocingulatus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +differs in the colour pattern of continuous spirals and the tuberculate spire whorls. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Probably shallow marine environments based on the coral-associated assemblages at species Letkés in Hungary ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +); +Pannonian Basin: +Pannonian Basin: Várpalota, Letkés ( +Hungary +) ( +Szalay 1926 +; +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +). + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and northeastern Atlantic. +Tortonian: +Cacela Basin +: Cacela Velha (Portugal) (Pereira da +Costa 1866 +); Sant'Agata Fossili, Stazzano, Montegibbio (Po Basin, Italy) ( +Sacco, 1893a +; +Davoli 1972 +); Casa Nova Calises, Forlì (Apennines, Italy) ( +Ruggieri & Davoli 1984 +); Messinian: Borelli (Turin Hills) ( +Davoli 2003 +). The early Pliocene occurrences from Vezza d’Alba and Asti (Po Basin, Italy) need confirmation ( +Davoli 1972 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD6FFC5FF5FAF27FE844191.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD6FFC5FF5FAF27FE844191.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7380d1d169 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD6FFC5FF5FAF27FE844191.xml @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus andreei +( +Kittl, 1887 +) + + + + + +Figs 15A +1 +–A3 + + + + + + +Conus Andréei + +n. f.— + +Kittl 1887 +: 241 + +, pl. 8, figs 2a–b. + + + + + +FIGURE 15A1–A3. + +Lautoconus andreei +(Kittl, 1887) + +, Jaklowetz at Ostrava (Czech Republic), NHMW 1888/0001/0008, holotype. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +: + +NHMW +1888 + +/0001/0008, +Jaklowetz +at +Ostrava +( +Czech Republic +); middle +Miocene +, early +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + +Studied material. +Holotype. + + + + +Illustrated +material. + +15A1–A3: +Jaklowetz +at +Ostrava +( +Czech Republic +): SL: +70 mm +, MD: +39.5 mm +, + +NHMW +1888 + +/0001/0008. + + + +Revised description. +Large solid shell with cyrtoconoid, bulbous spire with high, convex, weakly angulated whorls; deep suture. Flat to slightly concave, steeply sloping sutural ramp on last whorl; shoulder angulated. Subsutural flexure not preserved. Last whorl cylindrical below shoulder and distinctly constricted at base. Siphonal canal not preserved. Aperture moderately wide, anteriorly flaring. Shell surface smooth. + + + + +Discussion. +Only a single fragmentary specimen with recrystallized shell is available. As already pointed out by +Kittl (1887) +, the barrel-shaped last whorl characterises this rare species and separates it from all other Paratethyan cones. The poor preservation and lack of important conchological features make our generic placement provisional. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The mollusc assemblages from the Ostrava region suggest a deep water environment. +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Carpathian Foredeep +: Jaklowetz at Ostrava ( +Czech Republic +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD6FFC7FF5FAB32FC7C4797.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD6FFC7FF5FAB32FC7C4797.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d0076dd36f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD6FFC7FF5FAB32FC7C4797.xml @@ -0,0 +1,213 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + +Genus + +Lautoconus +Monterosato, 1923 + + + + + + + +Type species (by original designation): + +Conus mediterraneus +Hwass in +Bruguière, 1792 + +. Recent, Mediterranean Sea. + + +Note. +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +gave few shell features by which to distinguish members of the genus + +Lautoconus +Monterosato, 1923 + +. The shells are turgid in shape with convex sides. The protoconch is paucispiral. The whorl tops are ornamented with cords that reach the middle spire whorls and often persist. The subsutural flexure is shallow to moderate in depth. + +Puillandre +et al +. (2014a + +, +b +) synonymized + +Varioconus +da +Motta, 1991 + +with + +Lautoconus +Monterosato, 1923 + +based on molecular data. According to +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +the genus + +Varioconus +da +Motta, 1991 + +is characterised by shells with smooth spire whorls, a rounded, indistinct shoulder, a shallow subsutural sinus and a paucispiral protoconch. For their molecular phylogeny + +Puillandre +et al +. (2014a + +, +b +) analysed numerous species, traditionally placed in + +Lautoconus + +but only two species, which are listed as + +Varioconus + +by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +( + +Conus xicoi +Röckel, 1987 + +and + +C. franciscoi +Rolán & Röckel, 2000 + +). Unfortunately, + +Conus variegatus +Kiener, 1845 + +, the +type +species of + +Varioconus + +, is missing from their analysis. Therefore, the synonymization remains debateable. + + +The main difference in shell characters listed by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +is the presence of cords on + +Lautoconus + +and their absence in + +Varioconus + +. The characteristic pyriform outline of most species placed in + +Varioconus + +is not a distinguishing feature but may also be developed by + +Lautoconus + +species such as + +Lautoconus mercator +(Linnaeus, 1758) + +. The radula morphologies as described by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +do not require a separation and their West African geographic distribution is identical. Consequently, we follow + +Puillandre +et al +. (2014a + +, +b +) and treat + +Varioconus + +as subjective junior synonym of + +Lautoconus + +. + + +The genus + +Lautoconus + +is represented in the middle Miocene Paratethys Sea by several species, which comprise moderately small to moderately large and medium-wide to wide shells with low to medium high spires; spiral cords on the sutural ramp may be present or replaced by faint spiral threads. The subsutural flexures are variable in depth, ranging from very shallow to deep, are usually moderately curved and moderately asymmetrical. + + +To our knowledge, none of the extant + +Lautoconus + +(and + +Varioconus + +) species has a tuberculate early spire or develops nodes. Therefore, we exclude tuberculate species from + +Lautoconus + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD8FFC7FF5FAC57FEF6439A.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD8FFC7FF5FAC57FEF6439A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c553d9e2011 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD8FFC7FF5FAC57FEF6439A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,491 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus voeslauensis +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +U, 14C1–C3,14D1–D3 + + + + + +Conus clavatus +Lam. + +—Hörnes 1851: 25 (partim), pl. 2, figs 5a–b. + + + +[ + +Dendroconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] +Vöslauensis +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +Voeslauensis + +nov. form.— +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +(partim): 22, pl. 1, fig. 8, pl. 3, fig. 4. + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +mediterraneus + +] + +var. +ponderoclavata +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 104 + +( +nov. nom. pro + +Conus clavatus +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 2, fig. 5). + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +voeslauensis +Hoernes + +et Auinger—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 122, pl. 11, figs 3–4. + + + + + + +Conus + +( + +Lithoconus + +?) + +voeslauensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 456 + +, pl. 68, figs 1–2. + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +voeslauensis +Hoernes & Auinger—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 4, figs 4a–b. + + + + +non + +Conus + +cf. + +Voeslauensis + +R. Hoern. et Au.— + +Bauer 1900 +: 21 + +, pl. 1, fig. 1. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +voeslauensis +Hoernes und Auinger 1879 + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 215 + +, pl. 51, fig. 4 [= + +Lautoconus steindachnerii +(Hoernes, 1879) + +] + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +6 syntypes + +NHMW +1849 + +/0023/0005, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +) including specimen illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 3, fig. 4) + + +, + +2 syntypes + +NHMW +1851 + +/0010/0002, +Mikulov-Kienberk +( +Czech Republic +), including specimen illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, fig. 8) + +; all middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes +and 3 spec. + +NHMW +1853 + +/0010/0005, +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +), 6 spec + +. + +NHMW +A1633, +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +), 3 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1849 + +/0033/0002, +Bad Vöslau +; 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0049, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +), illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 2, fig. 5). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 14 +C1–C3: +syntype +, Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +): SL: +55.5 mm +, MD: +34.4 mm +, +NHMW +1849/0023/0005a, specimen illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 3, fig. 4) +; +Figs 14 +D1–D3: +syntype +, Enzesfeld ( +Austria +): SL: 52.0 mm, MD: 31.0 mm, +NHMW +1853/0010/0005; +Fig. 3 +U: +syntype +, Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +): SL: +42.8 mm +, MD: +27.4 mm +, +NHMW +1849/0023/0005b. + + + +FIGURE 14A1–A3. + +Kalloconus tschermaki +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1853/0003/0003a, syntype. +14B1–B4. + +Kalloconus tschermaki +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Niederkreuzstetten (Austria), NHMW 1864/0001/0499, syntype. +14C1–C3. + +Kalloconus voeslauensis +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 1849/0023/0005a, syntype. +14D1–D3. + +Kalloconus voeslauensis +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Enzesfeld (Austria), NHMW 1853/0010/0005, syntype. + + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized solid shells; low conical to weakly coeloconoid spire; spire whorls bulgy and convex, delicate spiral threads on early whorls, later smooth except for prominent growth lines, suture deeply channelled. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Shoulder rounded, rarely subangulate, position of maximum diameter slightly below; last whorl only weakly ventricose or straight-sided, slightly constricted at base, typically with several strongly incised growth lines. Faint spiral cords on base; entire whorl covered with delicate spiral sculpture, visible only in tangential light. Siphonal canal short, slightly recurved; siphonal fasciole weakly swollen, twisted with prominent growth lines. Aperture moderately narrow, widening towards siphonal canal. Colour pattern consisting of numerous spirals (no subquadratic dots can be observed as illustrated by +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +). + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 10: largest specimen: SL: +61.8 mm +, MD: 35.0 mm, mean SL: +50.2 mm +(σ = 5.7), mean MD: 31.2 (σ = 2.8), spire angle: µ = 118.8° (σ = 4.7°), last whorl angle: µ = 38.9° (σ = 1.0°), LW: µ = 1.6 (σ = 0.08), RD: µ = 0.71 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.87 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.12 (σ = 0.01). + + + + +Discussion. +Most shells which can be reliably identified as + +Kalloconus voeslauensis + +are characterised by several deeply incised growth lines on the last whorl. In their original description of this species, +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +referred also to specimens from Lăpugiu de Sus, which, however, represent + +Kalloconus hungaricus + +. The specimen illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 2, figs 5a–b) as + +Conus clavatus + +is an aberrant specimen of + +Kalloconus voeslauensis + +. +Sacco (1893b) +introduced +ponderoclavata +as varietal name for this aberrant specimen, which thus is a subjective junior synonym of + +Conus voeslauensis + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The specimens from Bad Vöslau are filled with clay and might have dwelled in basinal settings. Mikulov-Kienberk and Enzesfeld, in contrast, represent shallow marine environments (own data). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep: +Grund ( +Austria +); + +Vienna +Basin: + +Bad Vöslau, Gainfarn ( +Austria +), Mikulov-Kienberk ( +Czech Republic +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin +: Forchtenau ( +Austria +) ( +Sieber 1956 +); +Transylvanian Basin +: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Chira & Voia 2001 +); +Pannonian Basin: +Szob, +Budapest +, Mecsek Mountains ( +Hungary +) ( +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956 +; +Strausz 1966 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD9FFC9FF5FADDCFA9742A4.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD9FFC9FF5FADDCFA9742A4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..686062a127e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFD9FFC9FF5FADDCFA9742A4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,363 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus tschermaki +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +T, 14A1–A3, 14B1–B4 + + + + + +[ + +Rhizoconus + +] + +Conus Tschermaki + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + +[ + +Rhizoconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Bittneri + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + + +Conus +( +Rhizoconus +) +Tschermaki + +nov. form.— +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 37, pl. 1, figs 1–2. + +Conus +( +Rhizoconus +) +Bittneri + +nov. form.— +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 38, pl. 5, fig. 3. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1864 + +/0001/0499, +Niederkreuzstetten +( +Austria +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, fig. 2) + +; early +Miocene +, +Karpatian +(late +Burdigalian +) + +; + +syntype + +NHMW +1853 + +/0003/0003a +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 5, fig. 2) + +; middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +(late +Langhian +). +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) is also the +type +locality of + +Conus bittneri +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +(considered to be a junior synonym of + +C. tschermaki + +). + + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes +and 2 spec. +Niederkreuzstetten +( +Austria +) + +, + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0063; 5 spec. +Niederkreuzstetten +( +Austria +) + +, + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0044; 1 spec. +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +NHMW +1853 + +/0003/0003b, 1 spec. +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +NHMW +1853 + +/0010/0003, 3 spec. +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +NHMW +1853 + +/0010/0002; 4 spec. +Enzesfeld +( +Austria +) 4 +NHMW +A 460. + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 14A +1 +–A3: syntype, Gainfarn (Austria): SL: +63.4 mm +, MD: 37.0 mm, NHMW 1853/ 0003/0003a, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 5, fig. 2) +; +Figs 14 +B1–B4, 3T: syntype, Niederkreuzstetten (Austria), SL: +75.3 mm +, MD: +43.9 mm +, NHMW 1864/0001/0499, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 2) +; NHMW 1846/0037/0044. + + +Revised description. +Moderately large, robust shells. Spire regularly conical, elevated, with moderately convex, smooth, bulgy whorls; suture deeply impressed to channelled, wavy and irregular. Last spire whorl less convex, forming a low-angled sutural ramp structured by prominent growth lines. Subsutural flexure of medium depth, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Shoulder with rounded angulation coinciding with position of maximum diameter; last whorl regularly conical, not constricted; aperture straight, rather narrow, only weakly broadening towards short, weakly recurved canal; fasciole weak, slightly twisted and not well demarcated from base and lip. Faint spiral cords may appear on base. Colour pattern of last whorl consisting of slightly wavy and frequently interrupted spiral lines, separated by wider interspaces. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 8: largest specimen: SL: +75.3 mm +, MD: +43.9 mm +, mean SL: +62.7 mm +(σ = 7.5), mean MD: +36.8 mm +(σ = 3.9), spire angle: µ = 108.3° (σ = 7.5°), last whorl angle: µ = 38.5° (σ = 2.0°), LW: µ = 1.7 (σ = 0.06), RD: µ = 0.7 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.93 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.16 (σ = 0.02). + + + + +Discussion. + +Monteiroconus hoernesi +( +Doderlein, 1863 +) + +is superficially similar but differs in its broader shape, the deeper subsutural flexure and the wider and straight siphonal canal. + +Conus bittneri +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, from Gainfarn, is most probably just an aberrant + +Kalloconus tschermaki + +with a pathologic spire. + + +Paleoenvironment. +All occurrences point to shallow marine coastal habitats (e.g. Harzhauser +et al. +2002; + +Zuschin +et al. +2007 + +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Karpatian (early Miocene): +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Niederkreuzstetten ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin + +: Gainfarn, Enzesfeld, Steinebrunn ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin +: Forchtenau ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFDBFFC8FF5FAE2DFDC5443D.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFDBFFC8FF5FAE2DFDC5443D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c3cf1844965 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFDBFFC8FF5FAE2DFDC5443D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,422 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus tietzei +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 3 +S, 13G1–G5 + + + + + +[ + +Lithoconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Tietzei + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +Tietzei + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 28 + +(partim), pl. 1, fig. 3. + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +tietzei +(Hoernes & Auinger) + +— + +Atanacković 1969 +: 215 + +, pl. 12, figs 14–15. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +aldrovandi +Brocchi—Atanacković 1969: 213 + +, pl. 13, figs 1–1b [non + +Conus aldrovandi +Brocchi, 1814 + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +tietzel + +[sic] Hoernes & Auinger, 1880— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 180 + +, pl. 40, figs 3–4. + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +karreri +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 180 + +, pl. 40, figs 5–6 [non + +Conus karreri +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +]. + + + + +Monteiroconus tietzei +( +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 +) + +— +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +(partim): 79, figs. 93, 95–96? (non figs 92, 94 = + +Kalloconus letkesensis + +nov. sp.). + + + + +FIGURE 13A1–A5. + +Kalloconus ponderovagus +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Niederkreuzstetten (Austria), NHMW 1849/0004/0016, holotype. +13B1–B3. +Niederkreuzstetten (Austria), NHMW A991. +13C1–C4. + +Kalloconus pseudohungaricus + +nov. sp., Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1868/0001/0380a, paratype. +13D. +Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), + +Kalloconus pseudohungaricus + +nov. sp., NHMW 1868/0001/0380d, paratype. +13E1–E3. + +Kalloconus pseudohungaricus + +nov. sp., Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1868/0001/0380b, holotype. +13F1–F2. +Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), + +Kalloconus pseudohungaricus + +nov. sp., NHMW 1868/0001/ 0380c, paratype. +13G1–G5. + +Kalloconus tietzei +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, NHMW 1847/0046/0004, Szob (Hungary), holotype. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1847 + +/0046/0004, +Szob +( +Hungary +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879 pl. 1, fig. 3) + +; middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). +The +specimen from +Lăpugiu de Sus +( + +NHMW +1870 + +/0033/0002), mentioned by + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879) + +in their description of + +Conus tietzei + +, is most probably not conspecific with + +K. tietzei + +and may represent a juvenile + +M. hoernesi + +. + + + +Studied material. +Syntype. + + + + +Illustrated +material. + + +Figs +13 + +G1–G5, 3S: sytype, +Szob +( +Hungary +): SL: +62.1 mm +, MD: +41.2 mm +, + +NHMW +1847 + +/ 0046/0004, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879 pl. 1, fig. 3) +. + + + +Revised description. +Moderately large shell with depressed spire; early spire coeloconoid, later spire nearly flat; spire whorls faintly concave; smooth except for delicate growth lines; irregular, impressed suture. Subsutural flexure of medium depth, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Rounded but prominent shoulder with position of maximum diameter closely below shoulder. Last whorl straight-sided and conical, not constricted; broad, low spiral cords on base. Aperture moderately narrow, widening abapically into weakly recurved, short siphonal canal; siphonal fasciole weak, twisted, poorly demarcated from base and inner lip. Colour pattern consisting of narrowly spaced spiral dashes. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +Only one +syntype +is available: SL: +62.1 mm +, MD: +41.2 mm +, spire angle: 141° (without coeloconoid early spire), last whorl angle: 41°, LW: 1.51, RD: 0.72, PMD: 0.85, RSH: 0.08. + + + + +Discussion. + +Kalloconus hungaricus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +is very similar in colour-pattern and general shape to + +K. tietzei + +, which could be considered simply a more slender morphotype of + +K. hungaricus + +. However, the coeloconoid profile of the early spire, the better-defined shoulder, the narrower last spire whorl and the narrower angle of the last whorl seem to justify the separation. + + +A rare species, which is at first sight also similar to several Paratethyan + +Monteiroconus + +species, but can but can be separated from these by the absence of spiral sculpture on the spire whorls. The only + +Monteiroconus + +species with smooth spire whorls is + +M. boeckhi +(Halaváts, 1884) + +, which can be immediately separated by its rather odd profile, constricted both just below the shoulder and the base and by its more twisted and slightly longer siphonal canal. Among the specimens from Letkés described by +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +the specimen illustrated as fig. 93 might represent + +K. tietzei + +, although it is slightly ventricose and its shoulder is slightly more rounded. The other specimens (figs. 92, 94) are distinctly smaller and more slender. Specimens of this species from Letkés in the collections of the NHMW have striate spire whorls, a broad last spire whorl and a densely spaced spiral colour pattern of delicate dashes, thus differing from + +K. tietzei + +and are described herein as + +Kalloconus letkesensis + +nov. sp. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The mollusc fauna and lithofacies of Szob suggest a sandy coastal environment with sea grass ( +Dulai 1996 +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Pannonian Basin: +Letkés, Szob, Diósd, Kemence ( +Hungary +) ( +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956 +; +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +southern Pannonian Basin +: Miljevići ( +Bosnia and Herzegovina +) ( +Atanacković 1985 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFDBFFCAFF5FA8E1FA0B4762.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFDBFFCAFF5FA8E1FA0B4762.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..629728b24a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFDBFFCAFF5FA8E1FA0B4762.xml @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus pseudohungaricus + +nov. sp. + + + + +Figs 3 +R, 13C1–C4, 13D, 13E1–E3, 13F1–F2 + + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +Hungaricus + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 29 + +(partim) [non + +Kalloconus hungaricus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + + + +Holotype: +Figs 13 +E1–E3: SL: +55.2 mm +, MD: +38.4 mm +, NHMW 1868/0001/0380b. + + +Paratype: +Figs 13 +C1–C4: SL: +49.4 mm +, MD: +34.5 mm +, NHMW 1868/0001/0380a. + + + + +Paratype: +Figs 13 +D: SL: +53.2 mm +, MD: +35.4 mm +, NHMW 1868/0001/0380d. + + +Paratype: +Figs 13 +F1–F2, 3R: SL: +49.9 mm +, MD: +35.9 mm +, NHMW 1868/0001/0380c. + + + + +Additional +paratypes +: + +2 specimens +, + +NHMW +1868 + +/0001/0380, all specimens from +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + + + + +Type +stratum: + +Badenian marly-clayey deposits with thin interlayers of sand and corallinacean limestones. + + + + +Type +locality: + +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + +Age: +Middle Miocene, early Badenian (= Langhian). + + + + +Etymology: +Referring to + +Kalloconus hungaricus + +with which this species was mixed by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +. + + + + +Description. +Robust, medium-sized shells; spire depressed and conical with low coeloconoid early whorls. Spire whorls nearly flat, smooth; last spire whorl forming a very shallow concavity close to the prominent, subangulate shoulder. Suture narrow but deeply incised. Subsutural flexure deep, strongly curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last whorl rapidly contracting, straight sided; position of maximum diameter close below shoulder. Lower third of last whorl with weak spiral grooves. Aperture narrow, with subparallel margins, only weakly broadening towards siphonal canal. Siphonal fasciole weak; siphonal canal moderately long, weakly reflected. Highly variable colour pattern consisting of broad flammulae on spire whorls and spirally arranged rows of small to moderately large subquadrate blotches on last whorl; delicate spirals of small dots may be intercalated; large blotches are indistinct. + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 6: largest specimen: SL: +55.2 mm +, MD: +38.4 mm +, mean SL: +52.4 mm +(σ = 2.3), mean MD: +35.6 mm +(σ = 1.5), spire angle: µ = 134.7° (σ = 6.4°), last whorl angle: µ = 40.5° (σ = 0.6°), LW: µ = 1.47 (σ = 0.06), RD: µ = 0.74 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.90 (σ = 0.01), RSH: µ = 0.08 (σ = 0.03). + + +Paleoenvironment. +Unknown; maybe offshore environments as represented by the clays of the +type +locality. + + + + +Discussion. +The specimens from Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) were mixed by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +with + +Kalloconus hungaricus + +from which they differ in their straight-sided, conical last whorl and the narrower shoulder. In addition, the conspicuous colour pattern is unknown from + +K. hungaricus + +. + + + + + +Conus trigonulus +Grateloup, 1835 + +, from the early Miocene of the +Aquitaine +Basin, is superficially similar but differs in its angulate shoulder and angulate adapical aperture. + +Conus parvicaudatus +Sacco, 1893 + +, from the Burdigalian of the Turin Hills, develops a comparable colour pattern but differs in its angulate shoulder and deep constriction of the last whorl. + +Kalloconus tietzei +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +is very close in overall outline but differs in its coeloconoid spire, the twisted siphonal fasciole, the wider siphonal canal and the conspicuous colour pattern of numerous narrow dashes. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFDCFFCDFF5FA9D9FC3046B3.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFDCFFCDFF5FA9D9FC3046B3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7835b00ebe7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFDCFFCDFF5FA9D9FC3046B3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus ponderovagus +(Sacco, 1893) + + + + + +Figs 3 +Q, 13A1–A5, 13B1–B3 + + + + + +Conus ventricosus +Bronn—Hörnes 1851: 32 + +(partim), pl. 3, fig. 8 [non + +Lautoconus ventricosus +( +Gmelin, 1791 +) + +]. [ + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +conoponderosus + +] + +var. +ponderovaga +Sacc. + +— +Sacco 1893b +: 76 [nov. nom. pro + +Conus ventricosus +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 3, fig. 8]. + + + +Conus +( +Cleobula) steindachneri +Hörnes & Auinger, 1879 + +—Harzhauser 2002: 114, pl. 10, figs 1–3 [non + +Lautoconus steindachneri +(Hoernes, 1879) + +]. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype + +NHMW +1849 + +/0004/0016, +Niederkreuzstetten +( +Austria +), illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 3, fig. 8). + + + +Studied material. +Holotype and 5 spec. NHMW 1853/0003/0003, 2 spec. + +NHMW +A991, all +Niederkreuzstetten +( +Austria +) + +. + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 13A +1 +–A5, 3Q: +Holotype +, SL: +34.5 mm +, MD: +21.3 mm +, + +NHMW +1849 + +/0004/0016, +Niederkreuzstetten +( +Austria +) + +; + +Figs 13 +B1–B3: SL: +53.9 mm +, MD: 34.0 mm, +NHMW +A991, +Niederkreuzstetten +( +Austria +) + +. + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized, robust shells; moderately high, broad conical to weakly cyrtoconoid, spire. Convex, bulgy spire whorls with deeply incised, channelled suture; early whorls striate with undulating suture. Last spire whorl less convex; subsutural flexure deep, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Distinct, subangulate shoulder coinciding with position of maximum diameter. Conical last whorl rapidly contracting, rarely with weak concavity below shoulder. Weakly constricted at base; siphonal fasciole weak; siphonal canal moderately long, slightly reflected. Aperture narrow with subparallel margins. Very weak spiral cords on base; irregularly spaced growth lines on last whorl may form prominent grooves. Colour pattern consisting of broad flammulae on spiral whorls, parallel to subsutural flexure; two broad dark bands below shoulder and on the posterior third with spirally arranged, somewhat irregularly spaced light dots on entire last whorl. Major growth lines coincide with thin, light axial threads in UV light. + + + + +Shell ratios and measurement. +n = +7 adult +specimens: largest specimen: SL: +53.9 mm +, MD: +35.5 mm +, mean SL: +48.6 mm +(σ = 3.6), mean MD: +31.4 mm +(σ = 3.2), spire angle: µ = 106.1° (σ = 8.6°), last whorl angle: µ = 38.2° (σ = 1.4°), LW: µ = 1.55 (σ = 0.09), RD: µ = 0.76 (σ = 0.05), PMD: µ = 0.89 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.14 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +This species was mixed with + +Conus steindachneri +Hoernes, 1879 + +by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +and subsequent authors (e.g. Harzhauser 2002). It differs in the narrower last spire whorl, the higher, broad conical to cyrtoconoid spire, the broader last whorl, the weaker siphonal fasciole and the shorter siphonal canal. A further difference is the colour pattern of broad flammulae on the spire whorls, which are absent in + +Lautoconus steindachneri +. +Kalloconus ponderovagus + +is also reminiscent of + +Kalloconus tschermaki +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +but differs in its smaller size and the colour pattern, which consist of wide-spaced spirals in + +K. tschermaki + +. +Sacco (1893b) +introduced this name for the specimen illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 3, fig. 8), which he recognised as “totally different from + +Conus steindachneri + +”, thus rejecting the synonymization by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +. Although we agree with Sacco (193b), his act was correct just by chance, as the specimen of Hörnes (1851) is a subadult specimen, lacking the characteristic broad shoulder. Therefore, we provide illustrations of adult specimens from the +type +locality. + + + +Conus parvicaudatus +Sacco, 1893 + +, from the early Miocene of the Turin Hills, differs in the pronounced constriction of the last whorl and the higher position of the adapical part of the aperture, which reaches above the shoulder. + + + + +Paleoenvironment. +The species occurs in sandy shallow water deposits. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Karpatian (early Miocene): +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Niederkreuzstetten ( +Austria +); +Korneuburg Basin +: Karnabrunn ( +Austria +) (Harzhauser 2002). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFDEFFCDFF5FAD55FC8B4034.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFDEFFCDFF5FAD55FC8B4034.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..955d95650a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFDEFFCDFF5FAD55FC8B4034.xml @@ -0,0 +1,609 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Kalloconus ponderoaustriacus +(Sacco, 1893) + + + + + +Figs 3 +P, 11G1–G3, 11H1–H3 + + + + + + +Conus +( +Rhizoconus +) +ponderosus +Brocc. Var. + +III—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 39 + +(partim), pl. 5, fig. 6 [non + +Lautoconus ponderosus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Chelyconus) conoponderosus +Sacc. + +] + +var. +ponderoaustriaca +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 75 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus ponderosus +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 5, fig. 6]. + + + +? + +Conus ponderosus +Brocc. + + +var. +Steinabrunnensis + +Sacco—Friedberg 1911: 58, text-fig. 12 (non pl. 3, fig. 3) [non + +Lautoconus steinabrunnensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Rhizoconus) ponderosus steinabrunnensis +(Sacco) + +— +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956 +: plate captions, pl. 11, figs 11–12. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus) ponderosus +var. +ponderoaustriaca +(Sacco) + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 214 + +, pl. 51, fig. 1. + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus) ponderosus +var. +steinabrunnensis +(Sacco) + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 213 + +, pl. 50, fig. 8 [non + +Lautoconus steinabrunnensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +]. + + + + + + + +Conus ponderosus +Brocc. + +— + +Eremija 1959 +: 187 + +, pl. 1, figs 5-5a [non + +Lautoconus ponderosus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Rhisoconus) +[sic] +ponderosus + + +ponderosus +Brocchi—Atanacković 1963: 79 + +, pl. 15, fig. 1 [non + +Lautoconus ponderosus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + +? + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +steindachneri +Hoernes et Auinger—Atanacković 1963: 79 + +, pl. 14, figs 6–6b. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +ponderosus ponderoaustriacus +(Sacco, 1893) + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 151 + +, pl. 38, figs 4a–b. + + + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) aff. +ponderoaustriacus +Sacco, 1893 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 462 + +, pl. 69, figs 7–8. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +ponderosus ponderoaustriacus +(Sacco, 1893) + +— + +Nicorici & Sagatovici 1973 +: 176 + +, pl. 27, figs 6–7. + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +ponderosus ponederoaustriacus + +[sic] (Sacco, 1893)— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 177 + +, pl. 39, figs 10–11. + + + + + +Conus panderosus + + +[sic] +ponderoaustriacus +(Sacco) + +— + +Ionesi & Nicorici 1994 +: 62 + +, pl. 5, figs 5, 7. + + + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +ponderosus +Brocchi—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + + +, pl. 3, figs 1a–b. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0041, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + +Studied material. +Holotype and 1 spec. NHMW 1854/0035/0041, 1 spec. + + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0037, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +; + +2 spec. + +NHMW +1856 + +/0050/0109, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +; + +5 spec. + +NHMW +1855 + +/0045/0358, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +; + +9 spec. + +NHMW +1861 + +/0033/0005, +Bujtur +( +Romania +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 11 +G1–G3, 3P: +holotype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +), SL: +50.4 mm +, MD: +27.1 mm +, +NHMW +1854/0035/0041; +Figs 11 +H1–H3: Gainfarn ( +Austria +), SL: +49.6 mm +, MD: +27.5 mm +, +NHMW +1855/0045/ 0 358. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+FIGURE 12. +Principal Components Analysis +(PCA)of shellratiosof + +Kalloconus moravicus + + +and + +Phasmoconus + +
+ +fuscocingulatus + +revealing a clear separation. LWA += angleof the lastwhorl,LW= length width ratio, RD= relative diameter,
RSH = relative height of spire.
+ + +Revised description. +Medium-sized shells with low conical to broad coeloconoid spire; early spire whorls nearly flat, later whorls weakly convex with last spire whorl often slightly more convex; spire whorls smooth; suture channelled. Subsutural flexure shallow, weakly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Spire passing via a rounded shoulder into conical to weakly ventricose last whorl; position of maximum diameter close below shoulder. Last whorl faintly constricted; prominent to weak spiral grooves may appear on lower third; siphonal canal short; siphonal fasciole weak and indistinct. Aperture moderately narrow, posteriorly narrowing and only weakly broadening anteriorly. Colour pattern poorly preserved, but seems to consist of densely spaced continuous spirals. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +10 adult +specimens: largest specimen: SL: +59.3 mm +, MD: +34.1 mm +, mean SL: +49.8 mm +(σ = 4.6), mean MD: +27.6 mm +(σ = 2.9), spire angle: µ = 115.2° (σ = 8.1°), last whorl angle: µ = 34.6° (σ = 2.5°), LW: µ = 1.8 (σ = 0.1), RD: µ = 0.64 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.9 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.1 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +Differs from + +Lautoconus steinabrunnensis + +in the rounded shoulder, convex spire whorls, lower spire and the higher position of the maximum diameter. Its aperture is narrower especially in the posterior part. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Shallow marine environments; at least at Gainfarn, the species was associated with seagrass. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin + +: Gainfarn ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Transylvanian Basin +: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Pannonian Basin: +Hidas, Szob ( +Hungary +) (Csepreghy-Meznerics 1950, 1956; +Strausz 1966 +); +Zârand Basin +: Minişul de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Nicorici & Sagatovici 1973 +); +Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: +Valea Satului ( +Romania +) ( +Hinculov 1968 +); + +Buzău +Basin + +: Valea Muscelului ( +Romania +) ( +Ionesi & Nicorici 1994 +); +Dacian Basin +: Dobruša ( +Bulgaria +) ( +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +); +Banja Luka Basin +: Jazovac ( +Bosnia and Herzegovina +) ( +Atanacković 1985 +); +Karlovac-Glina Basin: +Glina ( +Croatia +) ( +Eremija 1959 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFE1FFF0FF5FA93AFD834418.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFE1FFF0FF5FA93AFD834418.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..855b801ca1e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFE1FFF0FF5FA93AFD834418.xml @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Phasmoconus schroeckingeri +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + + +Figs +29 + +I1–I4, 30B + + + + + +[ + +Chelyconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Schroeckingeri + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Schroeckingeri + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 51 + +, pl. 1, fig. 19. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +, + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0040, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + + +Illustrated material. + +Figs + +29 + + +I1–I4, 30B: +Holotype +, + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0040, height +23.7 mm +, MD: +13.8 mm +, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + + +Studied material. +Holotype +and 1 spec. +NHMW +A1607, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + +Revised description. +Small pyriform shell with low conical to coeloconoid spire; early spire whorls angulated, tuberculate; later whorls flat, striate. Subsutural flexure very shallow, weakly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Suture impressed. Last whorl faintly angulated and convex below; constricted. Lower third of last whorl and base covered by wide-spaced, raised spiral cords. Moderately long, weakly reflected siphonal canal. Siphonal fasciole very weak. Aperture narrowing adapically and widening towards siphonal canal. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of regularly spaced, thin spirals on entire last whorl, coinciding with spiral cords on base. Spirals overlain by large, roughly trigonal blotches amalgamating into two irregular bands below shoulder and below midwhorl. + + + + +Shell ratios and measurements +. n = +2 specimens +: SL: 23.7/ +23.8 mm +, MD: 13.8/ +13.4 mm +, spire angle: 110°/ 104°), last whorl angle: 40°/40°, LW: 1.72/1.78, RD: 0.67/0.66, PMD: 0.83/0.80, RSH: µ = 0.14/0.15. + + + + +Discussion. +Although known by just two specimens, this seems to be a distinct species. None of the other Paratethyan cone species develops such a stout pyriform shape with striate spire whorls and raised spiral cords on the base. This sculpture of wide-spaced, prominent spiral cords on the last whorl is reminiscent of + +Conus + +s.l. + +sturi +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +but the strongly constricted base and the low conical coeloconoid spire exclude that + +P. schroeckingeri + +is just a juvenile + +C. sturi + +. Further, the colour pattern of delicate spirals overlain by large blotches is unknown from any other Paratethyan species. + + +Paleoenvironment. +No information. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +). The occurrence of this species in the Tortonian of Barcelona, mentioned by Faura I Sans (1908), needs confirmation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFE1FFF0FF5FADB3FEC4460E.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFE1FFF0FF5FADB3FEC4460E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ee042d39a96 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFE1FFF0FF5FADB3FEC4460E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + +Genus + +Plagioconus + +Tucker & Tenorio, 2009 + + + + + + +Type species (by original designation): + +Conus elatus +Michelotti, 1847 + +. Miocene, Europe. + + +Note. +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +erected the genus + +Plagioconus + +, which they characterised as including species with an elongated last whorl, spire with a convex profile; the spire whorls devoid of sculpture and a shallow subsutural flexure. This is an exclusively European Miocene genus. If our interpretation of the genus is correct, the generic description must be emended. The shells have indeed an elongated last whorl, but the spire, which can be mediumhigh is always beaded on the earliest whorls and spiral sculpture on the ramp may range from finely to distinctly striate. +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +described the anal notch as shallow, however, most species, including the type species, have a deep to very deep, moderately to strongly asymmetrical subsutural flexure, which is moderately to strongly curved. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFE2FFF0FF5FA8CAFAC14192.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFE2FFF0FF5FA8CAFAC14192.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0177b4a0b09 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFE2FFF0FF5FA8CAFAC14192.xml @@ -0,0 +1,440 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Phasmoconus ottiliae +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 29 +G1–G3, 29H1–H3, 30A + + + + + +[ + +Chelyconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Ottiliae + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Ottiliae + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 42 + +, pl. 6, figs 12 +– +13. + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] + +Stephanoconus + +? + +Ottiliae + +(H. A.)— + +Sacco 1893b +: 119 + +. + + + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] +S +.[ +tephanoconus +] + +Ottiliae + + +var. +miolapugyensis +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893b +: 119 + +(nov. nom pro + +Conus ottiliae +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 6, fig. 13). + + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +ottiliae +Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 150 + +, pl. 38, figs 2a–b. + + + +? + +Conus ottiliae +Hoernes + +et Auinger—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972: 34, pl. 17, fig. 21. + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +ottiliae +Hoernes et Auinger 1879 + +—Bohn-Havas 1973: 1123, pl. 7, figs 7–8. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +2 syntypes + +NHMW +1870 + +/0033/0009, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 6, figs 12 +– +13) + +; middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes +and 1 spec. + +NHMW +1847 + +/0061/0001, +Szob +( +Hungary +). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 29 +G1–G3: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +24.9 mm +, MD: +12.1 mm +, +NHMW +1870/0033/0009, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig. 13) +(= +holotype +of + +Conus ottiliae miolapugyensis +Sacco, 1893 + +); +Figs 29 +H1–H3, 30A: Szob ( +Hungary +): SL: +23.1 mm +, MD: +11.4 mm +, +NHMW +1847/ 0061/0001. + + +Revised description. +Small biconical shells with low to moderately elevated spire and elongate conical last whorl. Protoconch multispiral. Pointed early spire with beaded whorls; beads become weak during ontogeny; later spire whorls with 5–6 prominent spiral cords; spire weakly gradate; nearly flat sutural ramp; subsutural flexure shallow, weakly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl elongate, with subangular shoulder, position of maximum diameter slightly below shoulder, faintly constricted. Shell surface glossy, sculpture consisting of about 20 raised spiral cords with spirally elongated beads, being most prominent on lower third of whorl but weak and smooth in upper half of last whorl. Aperture narrow with subparallel margins; siphonal canal short, nearly straight; fasciole very weak. Colour pattern in UV light consisting of two light (fluorescing) spiral lines just below shoulder and at midshell and dots coinciding with sculpture on spire and last whorl. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. +2 adult +specimens: SL: 24.9/ +23.1 mm +, MD: 12.1/ +11.4 mm +, spire angle: 103°/ 105°), last whorl angle: 34°/33°, LW: 2.06/2.03, RD: 0.58/0.57, PMD: 0.95/0.96, RSH: µ = 0.16/0.14. + + + + +Discussion. +This species was placed by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +in + +Conilithes + +Swainson +, 1840 + + +but the shallow subsutural flexure, the elongate conical shape with low spire and the beaded spiral cords on the last whorl do not support this placement. Despite an overall similarity with + +Conasprella +Thiele 1929 + +, the weakly curved subsutural flexure does not correspond to the other species placed herein in + +Conasprella + +. Moreover, it does not plot close to other + +Conasprella + +species in the PCA based on shell ratios (fig. 28). Instead, this species plots close to + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus + +and + +P. schroeckingeri + +and agrees with these species in overall outline and subsutural flexure. The only marked difference is the beads on the last whorl. This feature, however, does not contradict a placement in + +Phasmoconus + +, as extant species of this genus may form beaded cords as well [e.g. + +Phasmoconus alabaster +(Reeve, 1849) + +]. + + +Sacco (1893b) +mentioned this species as rare from the Tortonian of Stazzano and Montegibbio and introduced several names for the late Miocene Italian specimens. He even proposed to separate the specimen illustrated by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig. 13) +as distinct variety + +Conus ottiliae miolapugyensis + +, which is unjustified. Therefore, we consider + +Conus miolapugyensis +Sacco, 1893 + +to be a subjective junior synonym of + +Conus ottiliae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +. + +Conus ottiliae asperula +Sacco, 1893 + +and +C. o. ovulatina +Sacco, 1893 might be conspecific with the Paratethyan species but we did not study the +types +in Turin. In any case it is surely incorrect to treat these specimens as + +Lautoconus pelagicus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +as proposed by +Hall (1966) +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The mollusc fauna and lithofacies of Szob suggest a sandy coastal environment with sea grass ( +Dulai 1996 +); there is no information for the other occurrences. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Carpathian-Foredeep: +Ostrava ( +Czech Republic +) ( +Kittl, 1887 +);? +Bükk Mountains +: Borsodbóta ( +Hungary +) ( +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972 +); +Pannonian Basin: +Szob, Pécsszaolcs, Ófalu ( +Hungary +) (NHMW collection; Bohn-Havas 1973); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Boettger 1902 +);? +Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: +Valea Bela Reca, Valea Calvei, ( +Romania +) ( +Hinculov 1968 +). The illustrations in +Hinculov (1968) +and +Csepreghy-Meznerics (1972) +do not allow a clear identification and might represent another species as well. + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea. +Tortonian (late Miocene): +Po Basin +: Stazzano, Montegibbio ( +Saco 1893b +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFE5FFF2FF5FA983FB7F461C.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFE5FFF2FF5FA983FB7F461C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f2ecdbca35c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFE5FFF2FF5FA983FB7F461C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,903 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus +(Hörnes, 1851) + + + + + +Figs 17 +W, +17X +, 29A1–A3, 29B1–B3, 29C1–C3, 29D1–D3, 29E1–E2, 29F1–F3 + + + + + +Conus +fusco-cingulatus + +Bronn—Hörnes 1851: 21 (partim), pl. 1, figs 5a–c [non figs 4a–c, = + +Kalloconus moravicus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +fuscocingulatus +Bronn—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 47 + + +, pl. 1, figs 10–13. + + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) + +] + +ochreocingulata +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893a +: 12 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus fuscocingulatus +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 1, figs 10–11]. + + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) + +] +pötzleinsdorfensis +Sacc.— + +Sacco 1893a +: 12 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus fuscocingulatus +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 1, fig. 13]. + + + + +Conus fuscocingulatus +Bronn—Friedberg 1911: 54 + +, pl. 2, figs 17–18. + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +fuscocingulatus +Bronn, 1848 + +— + +Moisescu 1955a +: 163 + +, pl. 15, figs 1–4. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +friedbergi + +nomen nov.— + +Moisescu 1955a +: 165 + +, pl. 14, figs 5–6. + + + + + +Conus fuscocingulatus +Bronn. + +— + +Eremija 1959 +: 187 + +, pl. 1, figs 7–7a. + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +fuscocingulatus +Bronn 1848 + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 214 + +, pl. 51, fig. 2. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +fuscocingulatus +Bronn—Florei 1961: 689 + +, pl. 9, fig. 67. + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +fuscocingulatus +Bronn, 1848 + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 149 + +, pl. 37, figs 11–13 [non fig. 10]. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +friedbergi +Moisescu, 1955 + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 149 + +, pl. 37, figs 14a–b. + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +berghausi exfuscocingulatus +(Sacco, 1893) + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 152 + +, pl. 38, fig. 9 [non + +Conus exfuscocingulatus +Sacco, 1893 + +]. + + + + +Conus + +( +Dendroconu +s) + +fuscocingulatus +Bronn—Atanacković 1963: 78 + +, pl. 15, figs 5–5a. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +fuscocingulatus +Bronn—Nicorici 1972: 70 + +, pl. 17, figs 5–6. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +fuscocingulatus +Bronn in +Hörnes, 1856 + +— + +Nicorici & Sagatovici 1973 +: 176 + +, pl. 27, figs 4–5. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +fuscocingulatus +M. Hoernes—Švagrovský 1982: 403 + +, pl. 5, fig. 3. + + + + +Conus + +( +Dendroconu +s) + +fuscocingulatus +Bronn, 1848 + +— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 181 + +, pl. 40, figs 11–12. + + + + + +Conus fuscocingulatus +Bronn—Ionesi & + +Nicorici 1994 +: 62 + + +, pl. 5, figs 1–4. + + + +? + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +fuscocingulatus +Bronn—Tiţă 2007: 554 + +, fig. 6/c. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +fuscocingulatus +Bronn in +Hörnes, 1856 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 459 + +, pl. 68, figs 8–11. non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +fuscocingulatus +Bronn—Stancu +et al +. 1971: 126 + +, pl. 8, fig. 8. + + + +non + +Conus fuscocingulatus + +Bronn—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972: 34, pl. 17, fig. 20. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +fuscocingulatus +Hörnes, 1856 + +— + +Švagrovský 1981 +: 152 + +, pl. 48, fig. 10. non + +Dendroconus fuscocingulatus +(Bronn in +Hörnes, 1856 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 66 + +, figs 43–46. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0055, +Pötzleinsdorf +( +Austria +), illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 1, fig. 5); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Serravallian +). + + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes +and 6 spec. + +NHMW +1861 + +/0033/0001, +Bujtur +( +Romania +), 7 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1861 + +/ 0033/0002, +Bujtur +( +Romania +) including specimen illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, figs 10–11) + +, including +syntypes +of + +Conus ochreocingulatus +Sacco, 1893 + +; 32 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0054a, +Pötzleinsdorf +( +Austria +); 8 spec + +. + +NHMW +A1608, +Bujtur +( +Romania +), 41 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1836 + +/0012/0108, +Bujtur +( +Romania +). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 29A +1 +–A3: Bujtur (Romania), SL: +36.5 mm +, MD: +18.2 mm +, + + +NHMW +1861 + +/0033/ 0 0 0 1, +Bujtur +( +Romania +) + +; +Figs 29 +B1–B3: Bujtur (Romania), SL: +34.1 mm +, MD: +17.5 mm +, + + +NHMW +1861 + +/0033/0001, +Bujtur +( +Romania +) + +; + +Figs 29 +C1–C3: Bujtur ( +Romania +), SL: +31.7 mm +, MD: +18.7 mm +, +NHMW +A1608 ( +poetzleinsdorfensis- +morph); +Figs 29 +D1–D3, 17W: Bujtur ( +Romania +), SL: +34.4 mm +, MD: +17.6 mm + +, + + +NHMW +1861 + +/ 0033/0002, specimen in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, fig. 11) + +; + +Figs +29 + +E1–E2: +Bujtur +( +Romania +), SL: +30.8 mm +, MD: +15.6 mm + +, + + +NHMW +1836 + +/0012/0108a; + +Figs +29 + +F1–F + +3, 17X + +: +Bujtur +( +Romania +), SL: +24.7 mm +, MD: +14.7 mm + +, NHMW 1836/0012/0108b ( +poetzleinsdorfensis- +morph). + + + +FIGURE 29A1–A3. + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +, Bujtur (Romania), NHMW 1861/0033/0001. +29B1–B3. + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +, Bujtur (Romania), NHMW 1861/0033/0001. +29C1–C3. + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +, Bujtur (Romania), NHMW A1608 ( +poetzleinsdorfensis- +morph). +29D1–D3. + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +, Bujtur (Romania), NHMW 1861/0033/0002. +29E1–E2. + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus +(Hörnes, 1851) + +, Bujtur (Romania), NHMW 1836/0012/0108a. +29F1–F3. + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus + +(Hörnes, 1851. Bujtur (Romania), NHMW 1836/0012/0108b ( +poetzleinsdorfensis- +morph). +29G1–G3. + +Phasmoconus ottiliae +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1870/0033/0009, syntype. +29H1–H3. + +Phasmoconus ottiliae +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Szob (Hungary), NHMW 1847/0061/0001. +29I1–I4. + +Phasmoconus schroeckingeri +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1854/0035/0040, holotype. + + + +Revised description. +Moderately small to medium-sized shells; paucispiral protoconch; high conical initial spire; later spire low, with beaded keel just above suture; beads move towards suture within 3rd–5th spire whorls and fade out as indistinct swellings within 6th whorl. Later spire of variable height, usually elevated and slightly coeloconoid; spire whorl tops weakly convex, faintly striate (only visible in high magnification); impressed suture. Subsutural flexure variable, very shallow, weakly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last spire whorl slightly broadening with indistinct shoulder. Last whorl moderately elongate, weakly ventricose, slightly constricted; aperture regularly widening towards long and reflected anterior canal. Fasciole swollen, long, twisted, often with weak axial threads; inner lip narrow, straight. Deep irregularly spaced spiral grooves with broad cords in lower third of last whorl. Colour pattern often preserved as brown lines and very prominent in UV light, consisting of about 12–15 rather regularly spaced, well defined, continuous spirals on last whorl (rarely discontinuous spirals occur), with broad interspaces; broadest interspace usually two spirals below shoulder. Spire with axially elongate flammulae and blotches especially on shoulder and last whorl; some specimens display a broad dark band on spire whorl tops (in UV) and a light spiral at suture. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 14: largest specimen: SL: +39.7 mm +, MD: +21.9 mm +, mean SL: +34.4 mm +(σ = 2.3), mean MD: 18.5 (σ = 1.6), spire angle: µ = 104.6° (σ = 11.2°), last whorl angle: µ = 35.2° (σ = 2.1°), LW: µ = 1.87 (σ = 0.14), RD: µ = 0.63 (σ = 0.04), PMD: µ = 0.89 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.14 (σ = 0.02). + + + + +Discussion. +The authorship is often attributed to Bronn, who used the name in his correspondence and listed it in Bronn (1848) as nomen nudum (considering it as junior synonym of + +Conus raristriatus +Bellardi & Michelotti, 1840 + +). Hörnes (1851) made the name available and based his description on specimens from numerous localities of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, clearly mixing several different species. Consequently, the status of this species is highly confused. Hörnes (1851) illustrated specimens as + +Conus fuscocingulatus + +, which represent two different species. He illustrated a specimen from Mikulov ( +Czech Republic +) as figure 4 on plate 1 and a second one as variety from Pötzleinsdorf ( +Austria +) as figure 5. Later, +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +separated the specimen from Mikulov as + +Conus moravicus + +and kept the “variety” of Hörnes (1851) in the synonymy of + +Conus fuscocingulatus + +. The confusion was completed by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +by illustrating additional specimens as + +C. fuscocingulatus + +, which represent at least three species. The specimens illustrated by Hoernes & Auinger as fig. 12 is a stout shell with very low spire and distinct shoulder; under UV light it displays an irregular pattern of densely spaced, spirally arranged dashes and differs completely from + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus + +[the illustration of the colour pattern in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +is incorrect]. It is most probably a + +Kalloconus moravicus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +. Their fig. 13 is also a very stout shell with nearly flat spire. For this specimen +Sacco (1893a) +introduced + +Conus poetzleinsdorfensis + +as new name. Unfortunately, the specimens of Hörnes (1851, pl. 1, fig. 5) and +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 10) +are rather untypical for + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus + +due to the broad last whorl, whereas all other specimens are more slender. Consequently, +Sacco (1893a) +proposed + +Conus ochreocingulata + +as new name for the shells o +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, figs 10–11) +, which are treated as typical + +P. fuscocingulatus + +herein. This confusion is reflected in a very broad range of morphologies and lumped species identified in Paratethyan literature as this species. A Principal Component Analysis of the available specimens did not allow any separation of the “ + +poetzleinsdorfensis + +”-morphs from + +Phasmoconus fuscocingulatus + +(Fig. 12); moreover, both morphs co-occur at Pötzleinsdorf and Bujtur. Therefore, we treat + +Conus poetzleinsdorfensis +Sacco, 1893 + +and + +Conus ochreocingulata +Sacco, 1893 + +as subjective junior synonyms of + +P. fuscocingulatus + +. + + +Moisescu (1955) introduced + +Conus friedbergi + +for specimens from Bujtur (Romania), which do not differ from + +P. fuscocingulatus + +. In her discussion she referred to the specimen from Białogon (Poland) illustrated by Friedberg (1911, pl. 2, fig. 19) as + +Conus +cf. +avellana +Lamarck. This + +specimen is lost and the illustration does not allow a clear identification. As Moisescu (1955) did not clearly state whether she considered the Polish or her Romanian specimen as type specimen, the status of + +Conus friedbergi + +remains vague. It is either a +nomen dubium +(or +species inquirenda +) or a subjective junior synonym of + +P. fuscocingulatus + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Most probably shallow marine environments based on the co-occurring mollusc assemblage and the geological setting at the very margin of the +Vienna +Basin (Sieber 1954). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): widespread in all Paratethyan basins. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFEDFFF4FF5FAE02FE2240C6.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFEDFFF4FF5FAE02FE2240C6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..52cae33cf50 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFEDFFF4FF5FAE02FE2240C6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1817 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + +Genus + +Phasmoconus +Mörch, 1852 + + + + + + + +Type +species (subsequent designation by +Cotton, 1945 +): + +Conus radiatus +Gmelin, 1791 + +. Recent, Indo-West Pacific. + + +Note. +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +gave only a brief description of + +Phasmoconus + +, stating that the shell was elongated and subcylindrical in shape with angulate shoulders. The protoconch is usually multispiral, but rarely paucispiral. The anal notch is shallow, and an anterior notch is either slight or absent. In addition, we notice that tuberculate early whorls are not rare in the genus. + +Puillandre +et al +. (2014a + +, +b +) accepted + +Phasmoconus + +as a subgenus of + +Conus + +and listed + +Fulgiconus +da +Motta, 1991 + +, + +Graphiconus +da +Motta, 1991 + +, + +Thoraconus +da +Motta, 1991 + +and + +Nimboconus +Tucker & Tenorio, 2013 + +as subjective synonyms. + + + +FIGURE 28. +PCA based on log transformed shell ratios as given in Table 2; note that conchological features, such as presence/ absence of tubercles, striae and convex/concave tops are not include in the data set. A. species plot showing components 1 and 2, species numbers refer to numbers in Table 2; B. morphospace occupied by the genera as defined herein, based on species plot A. + + + + +TABLE 2. +Selecteđ conchological features, subsutural flexure mesurements anđ mean values of shell measurements anđ ratios baseđ on measurements in Table 1 (SC = spiral + + + +corđs, +SCES += spiral corđs only on early spire whorls, +FS += faint striae, +US += unđulating suture, +CW += concave spire whorls, T = tuberculate, +BLW += beađs on last whorl; + + +subsutural flexure ( +SSF +): +SSFD += đepth, SSFđ = relative đepth, PV = position of the vertex; MH = međium height, MW = međium wiđth, SA = spire angle, +LWA += angle of + + +last whorl, LW = length wiđth ratio, RD = relative điameter, +PMD += position of maximum điameter, +RSH += relative height of spire). + + +. + +Genus Species SC +SCES FS +US +CW +T +BLW SSFD +SSFd PV + + +Artemidiconus granularis + +0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4.70 5.45 0.81 + +Conasprella berwerthi + +0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2.28 4.73 0.41 + +Conasprella minutissima + +1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2.22 4.07 0.44 + +Conilithes allioni + +0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1.75 3.56 0.43 + +Conilithes antidiluvianus + +0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1.52 2.36 0.44 + +Conilithes brezinae + +0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1.45 2.95 0.53 + +Conilithes eichwaldi + +0 0 1 0 0 1 0??? + + + +Conilithes exaltatus + +0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1.68 3.04 0.53 + +Conilithes sceptophorus + +0? 0 0 1 1 0??? + + + + + +Conus + +s.l. + +vindobonensis + +1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1.55 5.17 0.43 + +Conus + +s.l. + +johannae + +1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3.05 6.18 0.54 + +Conus + +s.l. + +posticestriatus + +1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3.55 4.95 0.71 + +Conus + +s.l. + +sturi + +1 1 0 0 0 1 0 2.04 4.98 0.36 + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis + +1 1 0 0 0 1 0 2.75 6.85 0.53 + +Conus + + +s. +l. + +olivaeformis +0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2.73 6.25 0.55 + +Conus + + +s. +l. + +praelongus +1 1 0 0 0 1 0 2.91 6.74 0.55 + +Conus + +s.l. + +argillicola + +1 1 0 0 0 1 0??? + + + +Kalloconus berghausi + +0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3.24 5.48 0.47 + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2.76 5.59 0.50 + +Kalloconus cacellensis + +0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4.02 13.75 0.41 + +Kalloconus tietzei + +0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1.85 5.80 0.32 + +Kalloconus gallicus + +0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1.96 5.03 0.50 + +Kalloconus hungaricus + +0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.94 5.67 0.42 + +Kalloconus letkesensis + +1 1 1 1 0 0 0 2.01 4.53 0.33 +……continued on the next page +. + +Genus Species SC SCES FS +US +CW T BLW SSFD SSFd PV + +……continued on the next page + + + +TABLE 2. +(Continueđ) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
25 + +Kalloconus + + + +moravicus + +01010002.365.010.50
26 + +Kalloconus + + + +neumayri + +01010002.185.800.64
27 + +Kalloconus + + + +ponderoaustriacus + +00000002.6314.570.48
28 + +Kalloconus + + + +ponderovagus + +11010001.595.810.34
29 + +Kalloconus + + + +pseudohungaricus + +00000001.374.150.35
30 + +Kalloconus + + + +tschermaki + +00010001.726.730.55
31 + +Kalloconus + + + +voeslauensis + +01000002.035.570.50
32 + +Lautoconus + + + +andreei + +0?????????
33 + +Lautoconus + + + +eschewegi + +00000006.6714.840.41
34 + +Lautoconus + + +ex. gr. + +bitorosus + +00001002.065.150.46
35 + +Lautoconus + + + +kovacsi + +00100002.376.210.62
36 + +Lautoconus + + + +magnolapugyensis + +00101001.364.410.50
37 + +Lautoconus + + + +miovoeslauensis + +11001001.935.930.35
38 + +Lautoconus + + + +pelagicus + +00000002.645.250.48
39 + +Lautoconus + + + +pestensis + +00000002.378.520.37
40 + +Lautoconus + + + +ponderosus + +00100002.234.930.57
41 + +Lautoconus + + + +pseudoponderosus + +??????????
42 + +Lautoconus + + + +quaggaoides + +00100001.795.040.45
43 + +Lautoconus + + + +rotundus + +11000001.984.270.51
44 + +Lautoconus + + + +steinabrunnensis + +11000002.456.360.48
45 + +Lautoconus + + + +steindachneri + +00100002.9712.880.38
46 + +Lautoconus + + + +subraristriatus + +00000002.807.370.54
47 + +Leporiconus + + + +paratethyianus + +11000112.717.940.67
48 + +Leporiconus + + + +suessi + +11000112.606.080.48
49 + +Leporiconus + + + +transsylvanicus + +11000112.487.230.57
50 + +Monteiroconus + + + +antiquus + +11001001.595.260.35
51 + +Monteiroconus + + + +boeckhi + +00101001.223.630.29
+ + + +TABLE 2. +(Continueđ) + + + +. + +Genus Species SC SCES FS +US +CW T BLW SSFD SSFd PV + +……continued on the next page + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
52 + +Monteiroconus + + + +conicomaculatus + +10101002.105.360.41
53 + +Monteiroconus + + + +daciae + +11001001.926.080.29
54 + +Monteiroconus + + + +girondicus + +11001001.414.020.36
55 + +Monteiroconus + + + +hoernesi + +00101001.785.800.53
56 + +Monteiroconus + + + +mojsvari + +11001001.723.630.45
57 + +Monteiroconus + + + +neugeboreni + +00001002.914.860.57
58 + +Monteiroconus + + + +pervindobonensis + +1100100???
59 + +Monteiroconus + + + +supracompressus + +00101001.275.040.27
60 + +Phasmoconus + + + +ottiliae + +11000112.927.870.52
61 + +Phasmoconus + + + +fuscocingulatus + +00100103.828.890.54
62 + +Phasmoconus + + + +schroeckingeri + +11000103.659.500.51
63 + +Plagioconus + + + +austriaconoe + +00100101.704.420.29
64 + +Plagioconus + + + +elatus + +00100101.236.370.22
65 + +Plagioconus + + + +extensus + +11101101.135.160.20
66 + +Plagioconus + + +hirmletzli +00000100.934.920.21
67 + +Plagioconus + + + +marii + +00100100.885.050.20
68 + +Plagioconus + + + +puschi + +00100101.813.530.37
69 + +Plagioconus + + +breitenbergeri +01100100.875.020.11
70 + +Plagioconus + + +belissimus +00100101.546.630.20
71 + +Plagioconus + + +lapugyensis +11000101.805.550.27
72 + +Pseudonoduloconus + + + +austriacus + +11011102.424.510.25
73 + +Pseudonoduloconus + + + +gastaldii + +1100110???
74 + +Pseudonoduloconus + + + +wagneri + +1101100???
+ + + +TABLE 2. +(Continueđ) + + + +. +Genus Species MH MW SA LWA LW RD PMD RSH + +Artemidiconus granularis + +13.60 7.20 68.00 41.00 1.90 0.74 0.90 0.29 + +Conasprella berwerthi + +21.10 10.20 78.00 32.30 2.10 0.60 0.90 0.20 + +Conasprella minutissima + +10.40 5.10 63.20 32.40 2.04 0.68 0.81 0.28 + +Conilithes allioni + +23.90 12.70 100.10 33.70 1.89 0.66 0.90 0.21 + +Conilithes antidiluvianus + +59.20 21.80 61.40 29.40 2.69 0.52 0.88 0.27 + +Conilithes brezinae + +32.80 14.30 58.40 32.70 2.30 0.63 0.90 0.31 + +Conilithes eichwaldi + +15.00 7.00 65.00 36.50???? + +Conilithes exaltatus + +40.80 16.40 59.70 30.90 2.50 0.56 0.90 0.29 + +Conilithes sceptophorus + +13.50 6.60 68.00 44.00 2.05 0.70 0.89 0.30 + +Conus + +s.l. + +vindobonensis + +51.9 27.20 98.30 35.10 1.91 0.63 0.89 0.17 + +Conus + +s.l. + +johannae + +74.25 38.75 94.00 32.50 1.92 0.64 0.90 0.19 + +Conus + +s.l. + +posticestriatus + +50.10 26.10 80.00 37.00 1.90 0.65 0.86 0.20 + +Conus + +s.l. + +sturi + +41.30 18.30 89.80 30.50 2.30 0.55 0.89 0.19 + +Conus + +s.l. + +mucronatolaevis + +50.90 26.80 98.80 36.00 1.89 0.64 0.85 0.18 + +Conus + + +s. +l. + +olivaeformis +22.30 11.20 87.70 36.60 2.00 0.60 0.87 0.16 + +Conus + + +s. +l. + +praelongus +33.70 14.90 71.50 33.80 2.30 0.58 0.87 0.23 + +Conus + +s.l. + +argillicola + +???????? + +Kalloconus berghausi + +35.00 24.30 128.00 40.10 1.40 0.75 0.87 0.08 + +Kalloconus hendricksi + +22.60 14.40 128.30 39.90 1.60 0.70 0.90 0.09 + +Kalloconus cacellensis + +70.30 43.60 130.00 30.00 1.61 0.69 0.93 0.10 + +Kalloconus tietzei + +62.10 41.20 141.00 41.00 1.51 0.72 0.85 0.08 + +Kalloconus gallicus + +50.10 31.90 123.00 37.00 1.57 0.73 0.90 0.12 + +Kalloconus hungaricus + +62.00 44.20 141.60 43.30 1.41 0.76 0.89 0.07 + +Kalloconus letkesensis + +33.80 22.30 138.50 41.50 1.52 0.73 0.87 0.10 + +Kalloconus moravicus + +39.40 26.20 132.10 37.90 1.50 0.72 0.91 0.08 + +Kalloconus neumayri + +28.80 18.50 128.10 37.90 1.60 0.71 0.91 0.09 +……continued on the next page +. +Genus Species MH MW SA LWA LW RD PMD RSH + +Kalloconus ponderoaustriacus + +49.80 27.60 115.20 34.60 1.80 0.64 0.90 0.10 + +Kalloconus ponderovagus + +48.60 31.40 106.10 38.20 1.55 0.76 0.89 0.14 + +Kalloconus pseudohungaricus + +52.40 35.60 134.70 40.50 1.47 0.74 0.90 0.08 + +Kalloconus tschermaki + +62.70 36.80 108.30 38.50 1.70 0.70 0.93 0.16 + +Kalloconus voeslauensis + +50.20 31.20 118.80 38.90 1.60 0.71 0.87 0.12 + +Lautoconus andreei + +? 39.50?????? + +Lautoconus eschewegi + +37.40 20.80 113.30 37.00 1.80 0.63 0.86 0.12 + +Lautoconus + +ex. gr. + +bitorosus + +55.30 31.90 130.00 37.00 1.73 0.65 0.81 0.11 + +Lautoconus kovacsi + +18.60 11.40 102.00 42.30 1.64 0.74 0.80 0.17 + +Lautoconus magnolapugyensis + +64.30 42.50 134.30 43.70 1.51 0.74 0.90 0.11 + +Lautoconus miovoeslauensis + +51.20 30.40 121.90 38.70 1.69 0.68 0.86 0.12 + +Lautoconus pelagicus + +57.60 28.20 83.30 33.30 2.09 0.58 0.88 0.17 + +Lautoconus pestensis + +22.30 12.90 116.60 37.30 1.70 0.67 0.83 0.13 + +Lautoconus ponderosus + +76.30 42.30 100.00 36.00 1.81 0.67 0.91 0.17 + +Lautoconus pseudoponderosus + +???????? + +Lautoconus quaggaoides + +24.20 14.60 122.8 41.00 1.66 0.69 0.84 0.12 + +Lautoconus rotundus + +38.15 22.75 127.00 37.00 1.68 0.67 0.90 0.11 + +Lautoconus steinabrunnensis + +51.80 28.20 101.10 35.30 1.80 0.65 0.88 0.17 + +Lautoconus steindachneri + +46.40 29.40 116.90 37.50 1.58 0.72 0.89 0.12 + +Lautoconus subraristriatus + +54.30 28.10 92.60 34.60 1.90 0.63 0.84 0.18 + +Leporiconus paratethyianus + +32.67 17.00 88.67 37.30 1.92 0.68 0.83 0.23 + +Leporiconus suessi + +56.80 25.70 88.60 31.30 2.20 0.54 0.89 0.16 + +Leporiconus transsylvanicus + +47.10 19.90 84.60 29.20 2.40 0.51 0.87 0.17 + +Monteiroconus antiquus + +107.90 51.12 107.90 26.00 2.10 0.56 0.94 0.16 + +Monteiroconus boeckhi + +73.50 45.50 142.30 38.80 1.60 0.70 0.95 0.11 + +Monteiroconus conicomaculatus + +54.30 34.00 115.70 38.70 1.60 0.72 0.87 0.13 +……continued on the next page +Within the Paratethyan cones, + +Conus fuscocingulatus +Hörnes, 1851 + +and + +C. schroeckingeri +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +are characterised by very shallow and weakly curved subsutural flexures and are reminiscent of some + +Lautoconus + +species, such + +L. eschewegi +. + +These species plot also within the + +Lautoconus + +-field in the PCA based on shell ratios ( +Fig. 28 +). Both species, however, differ from + +Lautoconus + +s.s. +in the presence of tuberculate early whorls. Thus, we base the placement of both species in the Indo-West Pacific genus + +Phasmoconus + +on the similarities in shell outline, the morphology of the subsutural flexure and the tuberculate spire whorls. In addition, we place + +Conus ottiliae + +Hoernes & Auinger, +1879 + + +in + +Phasmoconus + +, based on the results of the PCA ( +Fig. 28 +) (see discussion in + +P. ottiliae + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFEEFFFCFF5FACABFE5B4741.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFEEFFFCFF5FACABFE5B4741.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c9d34faf3f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFEEFFFCFF5FACABFE5B4741.xml @@ -0,0 +1,293 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Monteiroconus supracompressus +(Sacco, 1893) + + + + + + +Figs +17 + +V, 26F1–F3, 26G1–G3, 26H + + + + + +Conus Mercati +Brocc. + +—Hörnes 1851: 23 (partim), pl. 2, figs 2a–c [ +non + +Monteiroconus mercati +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. [ + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) + +] +supracompressa +Sacc.— +Sacco 1893a +: 20 [nov. nom. pro + +Conus mercati in +Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 2, fig. 2]. + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +moravicus +R. Hoernes et M. Auinger + +– +Švagrovský 1982 +: 404, pl. 5, fig. 4 [non + +Kalloconus moravicus + + + +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +)]. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype + +NHMW +1851 + +/0010/0003, +Mikulov-Kienberk +( +Czech Republic +), illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 2, fig.2); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +(late +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material. +Holotype +and 1 spec. + +NHMW +1851 + +/0010/0004, +Mikulov-Kienberk +( +Czech Republic +); 3 spec + +. NHMW 1847/0037/0025, 2 spec. NHMW 1850/0009/0018, 2 spec. NHMW 1851/0026/0074, 2 spec. + + +NHMW +1878 + +/0041/0001, +Pötzleinsdorf +( +Austria +). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 26 +F1–F3: +holotype +, Mikulov ( +Czech Republic +): SL: +62.9 mm +, +43.2 mm +, +NHMW +1851/0010/0004, illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 2, fig. 2); +Figs 26 +G1–G3: Mikulov ( +Czech Republic +): SL: +62.8 mm +, +38.7 mm +, +NHMW +2016/0034/0001; +Fig. 26 +H, +17V +: Mikulov ( +Czech Republic +), SL: +53.9 mm +, MD: 33.0 mm, +NHMW +2016/0034/0001. + + +Revised description. +Moderately large shells; spire strongly depressed to flat with slightly protruding early spire. Adapical part of spire whorls flat to weakly concave, abapical part convex, often bulgy; faintly striate. Irregular, deeply incised suture. Subsutural flexure deep, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last whorl moderately broad, straight-sided to weakly ventricose, not constricted at base. Position of maximum diameter slightly below rounded shoulder. Aperture moderately wide, broadening abapically; adapically slightly expanding, extending to or slightly above apex. Siphonal canal very short, straight, wide; siphonal fasciole broad but weak, rounded. Spiral grooves on base. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of narrow flammulae on shoulder and broad, somewhat blotchy dark bands separated by three narrow fluorescing stripes. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +13 adult +and subadult specimens: largest specimen: SL: +82.8 mm +, MD: +49.5 mm +, mean SL: 64.0 mm (σ = 8.4), mean MD: +40.9 mm +(σ = 4.9), spire angle: µ = 153° (σ = 9.7°), last whorl angle: µ = 37.7° (σ = 1.7°), LW: µ = 1.57 (σ = 0.07), RD: µ = 0.65 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.93 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.02 (σ = 0.02). + + + + +Discussion. +This species is most reminiscent of + +Monteiroconus daciae +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +but is distinctly more slender (RD 0.65 vs. 0.73). The differences in shape allow also a clear separation of both species in a Principal Component Analysis based on shell ratios ( +Fig. 27 +). Moreover, the broad bands on the last whorl differ from the dashes and blotches of + +M. daciae + +as documented by + +Landau +et al +. (2013) + +. This species is known so far only from the mid-Badenian locality Mikulov-Kienberk and the late Badenian locality Pötzleinsdorf, both in the +Vienna +Basin. It might represent a northern offshoot of + +Monteiroconus daciae + +, which is mainly found in southern basins of the Paratethys. + + + +FIGURE 27. +PCA based on shell measurements of specimens of + +Monteiroconus daciae + +and + +M. supracompressus + +NHMW collection, Table 1). LW = length width ratio, RD = relative diameter, RSH = relative height of spire. + + + +Paleoenvironment. +The localities Pötzleinsdorf and Mikulov-Kienberk represent shallow sublittoral environments within the photic zone based on the co-occurring mollusc assemblages ( +Sieber 1953; own data, M.H. +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Pötzleinsdorf ( +Austria +), Mikulov- Kienberk ( +Czech Republic +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFEFFFFEFF5FA9E2FE4444B4.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFEFFFFEFF5FA9E2FE4444B4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..90e2f1aef89 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFEFFFFEFF5FA9E2FE4444B4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Monteiroconus neugeboreni +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 17 +U, 26D1–D3 + + + + + +[ + +Dendroconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Neugeboreni + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +Neugeboreni + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 19 + +, pl. 1, fig. 5, pl. 2, fig. 5. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype + +NHMW +1949 + +/0005/0001, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + +Studied material. +Holotype. + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 26 +D1–D3, 17U: +holotype +, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), SL: +66 mm +, MD: +38 mm +, + +NHMW +1949 + +/0005/0001; middle Miocene, Badenian (Langhian). + + + + + +Description: +Moderately large shell of pyriform shape. Low conical spire with pointed apex; spire whorls deeply concave in adapical half, forming a convex bulge in abapical part; smooth, suture narrow and regular. Shoulder rounded; last whorl moderately convex above maximum diameter, strongly constricted below; subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Aperture narrow adapically, widening towards moderately narrow and long canal. Base with narrow, widely-spaced, convex spiral cords; siphonal fasciole very weak; inner lip narrow, slightly twisted. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of numerous, densely spaced spirals of dashes covering the last whorl; the blotches on the shoulder indicated by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1 fig. 5) +are a misinterpretation or are not visible any more. + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +Holotype +: SL: +66 mm +, MD: +38 mm +, spire angle = 128°, last whorl angle = 39°, LW = 1.74, RD = 0.64, PMD = 0.8, RSH = 0.1. + + + + +Discussion. +At first sight, this species might be considered synonym with + +Pseudonoduloconus austriacus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +, due to its pyriform shape. It differs, however, in the narrower, deeply concave spire whorls, the regular suture, the rounded shoulder and the even more pronounced constriction of the base. The aperture is adapically narrower, as is the siphonal canal. The position of maximum diameter is placed lower, resulting in a + +Ficus + +-like outline and lastly + +M. neugeboreni +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +lacks the subobsolete tubercles on the spire whorls seen in + +P. austriacus + +. As the fig-shaped outline is also atypical for + +Monteiroconus + +, this generic placement is tentative. + + +Paleoenvironment. +No information is available; shallow water elements are frequently found transported into deep marine settings at Lăpugiu de Sus. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFEFFFFFFF5FAE47FB3545FF.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFEFFFFFFF5FAE47FB3545FF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c451b484aeb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFEFFFFFFF5FAE47FB3545FF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,300 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Monteiroconus pervindobonensis +(Sacco, 1893) + + + + + +Figs 26 +E1–E2 + + + + + +Conus betulinoides +Lam. + +—Hörnes 1851: 16, pl. 1, figs 1a–b [non + +Kalloconus betulinoides +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +]. + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +betulinoides +Lam. + +— +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 17 [non + +Kalloconus betulinoides +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +]. [ +C +o +nus + +( +Dendroconus +) +betulinoides +(Lk.) + +] varietà + +pervindobonensis +Sacc. + +— +Sacco 1893a +: 4 [nov. nom. pro + +Conus betulinoides + + +sensu Hörnes 1851, pl. 1, fig. 1]. + + + +Type material. +The holotype illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 1, fig. 1) is lost. + + +Studied material. +1 spec. NHMW 1869/0001/0020, 1 spec. NHMW 2010/0004/1574, 2 spec. + + +NHMW +2010 + +/ 0004/1575 +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec +NHMW +A989 +Immendorf +( +Austria +) + +; + +2 spec. + +NHMW +1852 + +/0012/0010, 2 + +NHMW +1851 + +/0026/0004 +Grund +( +Austria +) + +. + + + + +Illustrated +material. + + +Figs +26 + +E1–E2: +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +): SL: 124.5, mm, MD: 74.0 mm, 1 spec. + +NHMW +1869 + +/0001/0020. + + + +Revised description. +Very large shells with low spire; spire whorls striate, weakly convex with shallow central concavity in some specimens. Subsutural flexure shallow and asymmetrically curved. Shoulder rounded or faintly subangulate, position of maximum diameter close below shoulder. Last whorl elongate, regular conical in dorsal view, ventricose in apertural view; not constricted. Aperture wide, slightly excavated at junction from fasciole and inner lip. Fasciole broad, swollen, demarcated from glossy, inner lip by distinct groove. Growth lines on last whorl below shoulder prosocline and straight. Siphonal canal wide, slightly deflected. No colour pattern preserved. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 5: largest specimen: SL: +124.5 mm +, MD: 74.00 mm, mean SL: +101.3 mm +(σ = 13.3), mean MD: +62.8 mm +(σ = 6.5), spire angle: µ = 135.6° (σ = 7.3°), last whorl angle: µ = 39.2° (σ = 2.6°), LW: µ = 1.61 (σ = 0.08), RD: µ = 0.69 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.9 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.1 (σ = 0.02), Hörnes (1851, pl. 1, fig. 1) reports a height of +128 mm +and a width of +73 mm +for the illustrated but lost specimen. + + + + +Discussion. +The specimen of Hörnes (1851, pl. 1, fig. 1) from Steinebrunn was already lost in 1879 ( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) and only a few additional specimens in the NHMW collection are available. Unfortunately, Hörnes (1851) presented only the dorsal view of his specimen. Therefore, the conspecificity with the Pliocene + +Kalloconus betulinoides +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +remained unchallenged. Only +Sacco (1893a) +proposed the variety name + +pervindobonensis + +for this specimen, without discussing specific differences from the type. A re-investigation of the few additional Paratethyan specimens seems to support Sacco’s position. The concave and striate spire whorls, the excavated columella and the deflected siphonal canal of the Vienna Basin specimens differ from the Italian + +Kalloconus betulinoides + +as illustrated by +Davoli (1972) +, +Pinna & Spezia (1978) +and +Chirli (1997) +. The shell is broader and club-shaped, the last whorl less elongate and the last spire whorl is narrower. Therefore, we propose to separate the middle Miocene Paratethyan shells as + +Monteiroconus pervindobonensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +. The generic placement is based on the concave and striate spire whorls. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The specimens from Bad Vöslau, Grund and Immendorf were found in clays indicating an offshore environment but transport from shallow habitats cannot be excluded ( + +Zuschin +et al. +2005 + +, +2006 +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys.? +Karpatian (early Miocene): +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Niederkreuzstetten ( +Austria +) (Harzhauser 2002). Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Steinebrunn, Bad Vöslau, ( +Austria +); +Alpine-Carpathian Foredeep +: Grund, Immendorf ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +);? Korytnica ( +Poland +) ( +Bałuk 1997 +);? +Pannonian Basin +: Letkés, Márkháza, Mátraverebély, Sámsonháza, +Budapest +: Rákos ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +);? +Krka Basin +: Gorenje Vrhpolje ( +Slovenia +) ( +Mikuž 2009 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF2FFFEFF5FAE41FC32402A.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF2FFFEFF5FAE41FC32402A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b8bdfce244b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF2FFFEFF5FAE41FC32402A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,783 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Monteiroconus mojsvari +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 17 +T, 25E1–E2, 25F1–F +2, 26I +, 26J + + + + + +Conus Mercati +Brocc. + +—Hörnes 1851: 23 (partim), pl. 2, figs 1a–b [non + +Monteiroconus mercati +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + + +[ + +Dendroconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Mojsvari + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + + +[ + +Dendroconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] +Gainfahrensis +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +Mojsvari + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 18 + +, pl. 3, fig. 2. + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +Gainfahrenensis + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 18 + +, pl. 2, fig. 4. + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +Mercati +Brocc. + +— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 27 + +(partim). + + + + +[ + +Conus + +] +L. +[ +ithoconus +] + +Mercatii + + +var. +miocaenica +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893a +: 20 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus mercati +in Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 2, fig. 1]. + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercatii + +[sic] +miocaenica +[sic] Sacco—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 421, pl. 10, figs 7–8. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercati +Brocc. + +— + +Florei 1961 +: 688 + +, pl. 9, fig. 66 [non + +Monteiroconus mercati +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercatii miocaenicus + +[sic] Sacco, 1893— + +Strausz 1966 +: 455 + +, pl. 68, figs 3–5. + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercatii miocaenicus + +[sic] Sacco, 1893– +Nicorici & Sagatovici 1973 +: 175, pl. 27, fig. 1. + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercati sharpeanus +( + +Costa +) 1866 + + +—Bohn-Havas 1973: 1123, pl. 7, fig. 9.? + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercatti + +[sic] +subaustriaca +Sacco—Chira & +Voia 2001 +: 156, pl. 2, figs 4a–b. + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercatti + + +[sic] +miocenicus +Sacco—Chira & +Voia 2001 +: 156 + +, pl. 2, figs 3a–b. + +Monteiroconus mercati +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +— +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 78, figs 89–91 (non figs 87–88) [non + +Monteiroconus mercati + + + +( +Brocchi, 1814 +)]. + + +non + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercati miocaenicus + +[ +sic +] Sacco—Nicorici 1972: 70, pl. 17, figs 1–2 [= + +Monteiroconus daciae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +)]. + + +non + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercati +Brocchi—Schultz 1998: 72 + +, pl. 29, figs 12a–b [= + +Monteiroconus daciae +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercatti + +[sic] +caniculatodepresa +Sacco—Chira & + +Voia 2001 +: 156 + +, pl. 2, figs 2a–b [= + +Pseudonoduloconus austriacus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1853 + +/0010/0001, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 3, fig. 2) + +, 2 spec + +. + +syntypes + +NHMW +1867 + +/9919/0001, +Coşteiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +; middle Miocene, Badenian (late Langhian). The type locality of + +Conus gainfahrenensis +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, considered to be junior synonym of + +M. mojsvari + +, is the middle Miocene locality Gainfarn in Austria. The type locality of + +Conus miocaenicus +Sacco, 1893 + +, considered to be junior synonym of + +M. mojsvari + +, is the middle Miocene locality Pötzleinsdorf in Austria. + + + + +Studied +material. + +Syntypes +and 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1847 + +/0037/0024, +Pötzleinsdorf +( +Austria +), illustrated specimen in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 2, fig. 1), +syntype +of + +Conus miocaenicus +Sacco, 1893 + +; 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1855 + +/0045/ 0 0 0 1, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +) + +; 1 NHMW 1853/0003/0001, 1 spec. NHMW 1997z0178/1484, 1 spec. NHMW 1855/ 0045/0354, 4 spec. + + +NHMW +1846 + +/0037/0046, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1848 + +/0021/0023, +Grinzing +( +Austria +) + +. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 25 +E1–E +2,26I +, 17T: Pötzleinsdorf ( +Austria +): SL: +103.6 mm +, MD: +60.3 mm +, +NHMW +1847/0037/0024, illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 2, fig. 1); +Figs 25 +F1–F2,26J: +syntype +, Gainfarn ( +Austria +): SL: +87.2 mm +, MD: +54.3 mm +, +NHMW +1853/0010/0001, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 3, fig. 2) +. + + +Revised description. +Moderately large to large shell up to +105 mm +in height; about 10 teleoconch whorls. Depressed spire with initially moderately coeloconoid and later low conical outline; adapical half of spire whorls weakly concave, distinctly striate; abapical part convex, sometimes bulging. Subsutural flexure of medium depth, strongly curved, moderately asymmetrical; suture usually wavy and irregular. Shoulder weakly angulated; position of maximum diameter slightly below shoulder; last whorl regularly conical below periphery, not constricted. Surface smooth except for weak growth lines and indistinct, low spiral cords on base. Aperture moderately wide, anteriorly broadening; siphonal canal very short, wide, nearly straight; fasciole not well demarcated, weakly swollen with prominent growth lines; inner lip twisted. No colour pattern preserved. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +8 adult +and subadult specimens: largest specimen: SL: +105 mm +, MD: +63.8 mm +, mean SL: +89.3 mm +(σ = 11.2), mean MD: +53.7 mm +(σ = 6.7), spire angle: µ = 132.3° (σ = 8.5°), last whorl angle: µ = 37.3° (σ = 2.1°), LW: µ = 1.67 (σ = 0.06), RD: µ = 0.66 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.88 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.09 (σ = 0.01). + + + + +Discussion. +The very broad species concept of Hörnes (1851) united several species as + +Conus mercati + +, which were later recognized as distinct taxa by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +and +Sacco (1893a) +. + +Monteiroconus mercati + +has smooth spire whorls, whereas the Paratethyan shells variously placed on + +M. mercati + +in the literature all have striate spire whorls (see + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +). The first available name for this +mercati- +like shells with conical spire (in contrast to + +M. daciae + +) and moderately elongate last whorl is + +Conus mojsvari +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +. Later, +Sacco (1893a) +introduced + +Conus mercatii miocaenica + +as variation name for the specimen illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 2, fig. 1) without discussing its relation with + +C. mojsvari + +. The only difference between the +syntypes +of + +Monteiroconus mojsvari + +and the +syntype +of + +M. miocaenicus + +is the larger size, more elongate last whorl and the slightly gradate last two spire whorls of + +M. miocaenicus +. + +As there are also intermediate specimens between both morphotypes, we consider + +M. miocaenicus + +a very large specimen of + +M. mojsvari + +and treat it as subjective junior synonym. + + +The single specimen, described by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +as + +Conus gainfahrenensis + +(NHMW 1855/0045/ 0351), is just an aberrant specimen of + +M. mojsvari + +with a slight constriction in the middle of the last whorl. + + +Paleoenvironment. +All occurrences reflect shallow water environments, partly with sea grass meadows and coral patches ( + +Zuschin +et al. +2007 + +; +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +). + + + + +FIGURE 26A1–A3. + +Monteiroconus hoernesi +(Doderlein, 1863) + +, Grund (Austria), NHMW 1851/0002/0004, lectotype. +26B1– B3. + +Monteiroconus hoernesi +(Doderlein, 1863) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1870/0033/0001. +26C1–C3. + +Monteiroconus hoernesi +(Doderlein, 1863) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1856/0050/0110. +26D1–D3. + +Monteiroconus neugeboreni +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1949/0005/0001. +26E1–E2. + +Monteiroconus pervindobonensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/0020. +26F1–F3. + +Monteiroconus supracompressus +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Mikulov (Czech Republic), NHMW 1851/0010/0004, holotype. +26G1–G3. + +Monteiroconus supracompressus +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Mikulov (Czech Republic), NHMW 2016/0034/0001. +26H. + +Monteiroconus supracompressus +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Mikulov (Czech Republic), NHMW 2016/0034/0001. +26I. + +Monteiroconus mojsvari +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Pötzleinsdorf (Austria), NHMW 1847/ 0037/0024. +26J. + +Monteiroconus mojsvari +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1853/0010/0001, syntype. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn Pötzleinsdorf, Steinebrunn, Grinzing ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Sieber 1958b +; NHMW collection); +Pannonian Basin: +Várpalota, Letkés, Szob, Biatorbágy, Devecser, Diósd, Kemence, Márkháza, Mátraverebély, Sámsonháza, +Budapest +: Adria street, Illés street, Rákos ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: +Zorlenţu-Mare ( +Romania +) ( +Florei 1961 +); +Transylvanian Basin +: Coşteiu de Sus, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) (NHMW collection); +Zârand Basin +: Minişul de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Nicorici & Sagatovici 1973 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF3FFE3FF5FAB69FD4B448F.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF3FFE3FF5FAB69FD4B448F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3ab523479e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF3FFE3FF5FAB69FD4B448F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,735 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Monteiroconus hoernesi +( +Doderlein, 1863 +) + + + + + +Figs 17 +S, 26A1–A3, 26B1–B3, 26C1–C3 + + + + + +Conus Aldrovandi +Brocc. + +—Hörnes 1851: 18, pl. 1, figs 2a–b [non + +Monteiroconus aldrovandi +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. [ + +Conus + +] + +Hornesi + +[sic] nob.— +Doderlein 1863 +: 25 [nov. nom. pro + +Conus aldrovandi +in Hörnes 1851 + +]. [ + +Lithoconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Karreri + +n. f.— +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 (nomen nudum). + + + +[ + +Lithoconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Fuchsi + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + +C. +[ +onus +] + +Karreri + +— +Hoernes 1878b +: 205 (nomen nudum). + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +Karreri + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 26 + +, pl. 4, fig. 7. + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +Fuchsi + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 26 + +, pl. 4, figs 4–5. + + + + + +Lithoconus parvicaudatus +(Sacco, 1893) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 74 + +, figs 77–78 [non + +Conus parvicaudatus +Sacco, 1893 + +]. + + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +aldrovandi +Brocchi—Atanacković 1969: 213 + +, pl. 13, figs 1–1b [ +non + +Monteiroconus aldrovandi +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +] [= + +Kalloconus tietzei +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +karreri +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 180 + +, pl. 40, figs 5–6 [= + +Kalloconus tietzei +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Lectotype +(designated herein), + +NHMW +1851 + +/0002/0004, +Grund +( +Austria +), specimen illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 1, fig. 2); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). +The +type +locality of + +Conus karreri +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, considered to be junior synonym of + +M. hoernesi + +, are the middle +Miocene +( +Badenian +) localities +Bad Vöslau +and +Gainfarn +in +Austria + +. + +The +type +locality of + +Conus fuchsi +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +, considered to be junior synonym of + +M. hoernesi + +, is the middle Miocene (Badenian) locality +Lăpugiu de Sus +in +Romania + +. + + + +Studied material. +Lectotype +and 2 spec. + +NHMW +1868 + +/0001/0203, +Grund +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1874 + +/ 0024/0058 +Ritzing +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1853 + +/0002/0045, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +); 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1849 + +/0023/ 0 0 0 4, +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +), +syntype +of + +Conus fuchsi + +illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 4, fig. 5) + +; 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1856 + +/0050/0110, +Gainfarn +( +Austria +), +syntype +of + +Conus fuchsi + +illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 4, fig. 4) + +; 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1870 + +/0033/0001, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), +syntype +of + +Conus karreri + +illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 4, fig. 7) + +. + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 26A +1 +–A3: +lectotype +, Grund ( +Austria +): SL: 76.0 mm, MD: +49.1 mm +, +NHMW +1851/ 0002/0004, illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 1, fig. 2); +Figs 26 +B1–B3: Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +78.2 mm +, MD: +51.2 mm +, +NHMW +1870/0033/0001, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 4, fig. 7) +; +Figs 26 +C1–C3, 17S: Gainfarn ( +Austria +): SL: +75.5 mm +, MD: +47.5 mm +, +NHMW +1856/0050/0110, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 4, fig. 4) +. + + +Revised description. +Large robust shells; spire low and conical with weakly convex, blunt, smooth to faintly striate whorls; rarely a shallow concavity may be developed (“ + +fuchsi + +”-morph). Late spire whorls slightly gradate; suture impressed. Subsutural flexure of medium depth, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Prominent, rounded shoulder, with position of maximum diameter slightly below shoulder, whorl profile straight to slightly constricted below, resulting in a depressed weakly club-shaped profile. Moderately narrow aperture with shallow, narrow posterior canal; anteriorly widening, terminating in wide, very short, straight canal. Fasciole weakly swollen, indistinct, demarcated from twisted inner lip by deep groove; base somewhat constricted below siphonal fasciole. Faint spiral cords on last whorl, visible only in grazing light. No colour pattern preserved. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 8: largest specimen: SL: +81.1 mm +, MD: +53.9 mm +, mean SL: +74.8 mm +(σ = 2.1), mean MD: +48.7 mm +(σ = 1.6), spire angle: µ = 123.6° (σ = 7.4°), last whorl angle: µ = 43.5° (σ = 2.8°), LW: µ = 1.5 (σ = 0.1), RD: µ = 0.75 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.84 (σ = 0.01), RSH: µ = 0.13 (σ = 0.06). + + + + + +Discussion. +Doderlein (1863) +introduced + +Conus Hornesi + +as new name for + +Conus Aldrovandi +sensu Hörnes, 1851 + +(non + +Brocchi +, 1814 + +) including a very brief description. +He +obviously referred to the +Viennese +palaeontologist +Moritz Hörnes +and “ + +hornesi + +” is a +type +setting error for “ + +hörnesi + +”, which should be corrected to “ + +hoernesi +” + +according to +ICZN +Article +32.5. +Therefore +, we propose to emend the name to + +Conus hoernesi + +. + +Doderlein +(1863) + +used the name for +Tortonian +specimens from Montegibbio and +S. Agata +in +Italy +but also as replacement name for the specimen of +Hörnes +(1851). +Therefore +, the +Badenian +shell from +Grund +in +Austria +is a +syntype + +. + +For +the sake of nomenclatural stability we select the specimen + +NHMW +1851 + +/0002/0004 from +Grund +( +Austria +) as +lectotype + +. + + +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +stated that the specimen of Hörnes (1851, pl. 1, fig. 2) is conspecific with their + +Conus karreri + +, which is confirmed herein, but obviously they overlooked the paper by +Doderlein (1863) +. Therefore, + +Conus karreri + +is a subjective junior synonym of + +C. hoernesi + +. + +Conus fuchsi + +was separated by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +based on the slight mid-whorl constriction of the last whorl and the higher position of the fasciole. We consider these differences to reflect only intraspecific variability and treat the illustrated +syntypes +of + +Conus fuchsi + +as subadult specimens of + +Monteiroconus hoernesi + +. The seemingly concave and incised siphonal canal of the specimen illustrated by +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 4, fig. 7) +is an artefact due to fragmentation. All other specimens show a wide, straight and convex margin of the siphonal canal. + + + + + +Monteiroconus hoernesi +( +Doderlein, 1863 +) + +is separated from + +M. daciae + +and + +M. girondicus + +by its smaller maximum size and its less depressed spire. It is closely similar to + +M. conicomaculatus + +, from which it differs in being larger shelled, in having less strongly striate spire whorls and not having a weakly ventricose last whorl, as in + +M. conicomaculatus + +. + + +When describing + +Conus hungaricus +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +included also some specimens of + +Monteiroconus hoernesi + +as can be seen from their handwritten labels. + +Kalloconus hungaricus + +, however, differs in its much wider last spire whorl. + + + + +The specimens described by +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +as + +Lithoconus parvicaudatus +(Sacco, 1893) + +might rather represent a low spired + +M. hoernesi + +, representing the “ + +fuchsi + +”-morph with concave last whorl. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Probably shallow marine coastal habitats based on the co-occurring mollusc assemblages (e.g. Letkés, +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +, Ritzing, Harzhauser +et al. +2014). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +); +Alpine Carpathian Foredeep: +Grund ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Oberpullendorf Basin +: Ritzing ( +Austria +) (own data); +Pannonian Basin: +Letkés ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Boettger 1902 +, +1906 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF4FFE2FF5FAC49FF5643A6.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF4FFE2FF5FAC49FF5643A6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c6de98249d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF4FFE2FF5FAC49FF5643A6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,263 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Monteiroconus girondicus +( +Peyrot, 1931 +) + + + + + +Figs 25 +C1–C3, 25D1–D3, 17R + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +betulinoides +Lamarck + +mut. + +girondicus + +nov. mut—Peyrot 1931: 98, nr. 1170, pl. 3, figs 4–6. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +illustrated in + +Peyrot +(1931, pl. 3, fig. 5) + +, +Aquitaine +Basin, +Salles +(Debat), +France +; middle +Miocene +, Serravallian. + + + + + +Studied +material. + +Bad Vöslau +( +Austria +): 1 spec. + +NHMW +2010 + +/0004/1569a, 1 spec + +. NHMW 2010/0004/1569b 3 spec. NHMW 2010/0004/1569c, 4 spec. NHMW 2010/0004/1568a–2010/0004/1568d, 2 spec. NHMW 2010/ 0004/1571a–2010/0004/1571b, 1 spec. NHMW 2010/0004/1572. + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 25 +C1–C3, 17R: Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +): SL: +127 mm +, MD: +79.5 mm +, +NHMW +2010/ 0004/1569a; +Figs 25 +D1–D3: Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +): SL: +108.6 mm +, MD: +62 mm +, +NHMW +2010/0004/1569b. + + + + +Description: +Very large and solid species; strongly depressed, nearly flat spire; spire whorls striate with deep concavity in adapical half, becoming more prominent during ontogeny; abapical half of spire whorls bulging; spiral whorls increase regularly in width, last spire whorl not exceptionally broad. Suture impressed. Strongly shouldered with rounded periphery; position of maximum diameter just below shoulder. Subsutural flexure deep, strongly curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last whorl moderately elongate, regularly conical below periphery, not constricted. Slightly allometric growth, fully grown specimens being more elongate than subadults. Weak spiral cords on base and prominent prosocline, straight growth lines on last whorl; fasciole raised, rather narrow, covered by prominent growth lines. Inner lip broad, twisted, glossy well demarcated from fasciole. Aperture moderately wide, only weakly widening abapically; siphonal canal wide, short and straight. No colour pattern preserved. + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = 12: largest specimen: SL: 127.0 mm, MD: +79.5 mm +, mean SL: +85.9 mm +(σ = 5.3), mean MD: +54.4 mm +(σ = 10.7), spire angle: µ = 154. 9° (σ = 11.1), last whorl angle: µ = 38.6° (σ = 1.98), LW: µ = 1.6 (σ = 0.08), RD: µ = 0.67 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.86 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.06 (σ = 0.02). + + + + +Discussion. +This species is among the largest cone shells of the Paratethys and it is morphologically quite clearly defined. Nevertheless, all specimens were labelled in the NHMW collection as + +Conus betulinoides +Lamarck, 1810 + +and + +Conus mercati miocaenicus +Sacco, 1893 + +(= + +Monteiroconus mojsvari + +). In respect to the inventory history, none of the specimens was probably known to Hörnes (1851) and +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +and later curators followed a rather broad species concept. A separation from + +Kalloconus betulinoides +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +is based on the nearly flat spire with deeply concave spire whorls and the comparatively narrow last spire whorl. + +Monteiroconus mojsvari +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +differs in its more conical spire, the shallower concavity on spire whorls and especially in the less prominent shoulder; its fasciole is weaker and the inner lip much narrower. + +Monteiroconus antiquus +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +, which is of comparable size, differs in its elongate slender outline and basal constriction. + +Monteiroconus daciae +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +can attain a comparable size and also has an almost flat striate spire, but the spire whorls do not have the deep concavity in the adapical half seen in + +M. girondicus +( +Peyrot, 1931 +) + +and + +M. daciae + +has a shorter, wider last whorl (RD 0.73 vs. 0.67). + + +Paleoenvironment. +All specimens derive from offshore clays in Bad Vöslau, whereas + +Monteiroconus mojsvari + +and + +M. antiquus + +are typically found in nearshore deposits. This suggests also an ecological separation of these species. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +). + + + + +Northeastern Atlantic +: + +Serravallian (middle Miocene): +Aquitaine +Basin: Salles (Debat, Minoy) ( +Peyrot 1931 +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF6FFE5FF5FA9C1FDA84286.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF6FFE5FF5FA9C1FDA84286.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e6310bd99d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF6FFE5FF5FA9C1FDA84286.xml @@ -0,0 +1,687 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Monteiroconus daciae +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 17 +Q, 25A1–A3, 25B1–B3 + + + + + + +Conus Mercati +Brocc in Hörnes—Pereira + +da + + +Costa +1866 + +: 11 + +(partim, pl. 3, fig. 3 only) [non + +Monteiroconus mercati +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + + + +[ + +Dendroconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Daciae + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +Daciae + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 21 + +, pl. 3, fig. 1. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +Loroisi +Kiener—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 21 + + +, pl. 3, fig. 5 [non + +Dendroconus loroisi +( +Kiener, 1845 +) + +]. + + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Dendroconus +) +Berghausi + +] varietà + +exloroisi +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893a +: 8 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus loroisi +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 3, fig. 5). + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercati +var. +daciae + +( +Hoernes und Auinger, 1879 +)— + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 211 + +, pl. 50, fig. 1. + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +planospira +Erünal-Erentöz, 1958 + +— + +Hinculov 1968 +: 152 + +, pl. 38, figs 10a–b. + + + + + +Conus mercati daciae +(Hoernes et Auinger) + +— + +Eremija 1971 +: 78 + +, pl. 5, fig. 10. + + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +mercati miocaenicus + +[sic] Sacco—Nicorici 1972: 70, pl. 17, figs 1–2 [non + +Conus miocenicus +Sacco, 1893 + +]. + + + + + + +Lithoconus planospira +( +Erünal-Erentöz, 1958 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 75 + +, fig. 41. + + + + +Monteiroconus daciae +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +— + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +, 242, pl. 38, fig. 7; pl. 39, fig. 1; pl. 41, fig. 11; pl. 42, fig. 5; pl. 78, fig. 8; pl. 81, fig. 6 [cum syn.]. + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1858 + +/0043/0002, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 3, fig. 1) + + +; + +syntype + +NHMW +1949 + +/0005/0002, +Nemeşeşti +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 3, fig. 5) + + +, holotype of + +Conus exloroisi +Sacco, 1893 + +. + + +Studied material. +Syntypes and 2 spec. NHMW 1856/0007/0001, 2 spec. + + +NHMW +1856 + +/0007/0001, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +; 2 spec. NHMW 1848/003/003, 6 spec. + + +NHMW +1930 + +/0006/0034, 1 + +NHMW +1970 + +/1396/0834, +Ritzing +( +Austria +) + +; + +2 spec. + +NHMW +1856 + +/0002/0002, +Grund +( +Austria +) + +; + +1 spec. + +NHMW +1862 + +/0032/0001, +Pöls +( +Austria +); all middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 25A +1 +–A3: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +), SL: +85.9 mm +, MD: +64.5 mm +, +NHMW +1858/0043/0002, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 3, fig. 1) +; +Figs 25 +B1–B3, 17Q: Ritzing ( +Austria +): SL: +81.9 mm +, MD: +56.1 mm +, +NHMW +1930/0006/0034. + + +Revised description. +Moderately large to large shells with a maximum height of +87 mm +. Spire depressed to flat; adapical part of spire whorls flat, striate; abapical part weakly convex, often elevated, resulting in weakly concave cross section. Subsutural flexure of medium depth, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last whorl broad, straight-sided, rapidly contracting, not constricted at base. Position of maximum diameter slightly below rounded shoulder. Aperture wide, broadening abapically, protruding above shoulder adapically in well preserved, fully grown specimens. Siphonal canal short, straight, wide; siphonal fasciole broad, rounded. Spiral grooves on base, rarely extending to mid-whorl. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +14 adult +and subadult specimens: largest specimen: SL: +86.8 mm +, MD: +64.5 mm +, mean SL: +67.8 mm +(σ = 13.3), mean MD: +48.2 mm +(σ = 9.1), spire angle: µ = 154° (σ = 12.3°), last whorl angle: µ = 42.2° (σ = 2.3°), LW: µ = 1.41 (σ = 0.07), RD: µ = 0.73 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.9 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.03 (σ = 0.02). + + + + +Discussion. +The larger +syntype +of + +Monteiroconus daciae + +is a slightly worn specimen with abraded base, fasciole and adapical part of the aperture. Therefore, it lacks the characteristic protruding adapical aperture. This specimen is also extraordinarily large and broad compared to other specimens. However, the specimens from the +Karaman +Basin of +Turkey +attain an even greater maximum size (height +104.3 mm +; + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +). We were not able to see a colour pattern in the Paratethyan specimens under UV light, however, a pattern is present in the +Karaman +specimens, consisting of axial comma-shaped reddish stripes on the spire and irregular, elongate, oblong blotches arranged in three bands, coalescent into broad axial flammules on some specimens ( + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +). + + + + +FIGURE 25A1–A3. + +Monteiroconus daciae +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania), NHMW 1858/0043/0002, syntype. +25B1–B3. + +Monteiroconus daciae +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Ritzing (Austria). NHMW 1930/0006/0034. +25C1–C3. + +Monteiroconus girondicus +(Peyrot, 1931) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 2010/0004/1569a. +25D1–D3. + +Monteiroconus girondicus +(Peyrot, 1931) + +, Bad Vöslau (Austria), NHMW 2010/0004/1569b. +25E1–E2,. + +Monteiroconus mojsvari +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Pötzleinsdorf (Austria), NHMW 1847/0037/0024. +25F1–F2. + +Monteiroconus mojsvari +(Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1853/0010/0001, syntype. + + + + + +Conus exloroisi +Sacco, 1893 + +, established for a single specimen from Lăpugiu de Sus, has a weak constriction of the base and a slight angulation on the shoulder but does not differ significantly from + +M. daciae + +. Consequently, + +Conus exloroisi +Sacco, 1893 + +is considered a subjective junior synonym of + +Conus daciae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1897 + +. + +Conus planospira +Erünal-Erentöz, 1958 + +, from the Serravallian of the Karaman Basin in Turkey, is also treated as subjective junior synonym of + +Conus daciae +Hoernes & Auinger, 1897 + +by + +Landau +et al +. (2013) + +, which is followed herein. + + +This species is probably much more widespread as suggested by the rather few published records; it seems to be misidentified in many collections. Most of the Paratethyan specimens in the NHMW collection were misidentified as + +Conus mercati +Brocchi, 1814 + +. This Pliocene species differs in its elevate spire (see +Hall 1966 +; +Pinna & Spezia 1978 +). +Davoli (1972, pl. 19, fig. 8) +mixed + +Monteiroconus daciae + +with + +Kalloconus betulinoides +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +, which differs in its elevated spire. + + + + +Paleoenvironment. +The locality Ritzing represents a shallow sublittoral environment (Harzhauser +et al +. 2014). The deeper water occurrences from Lăpugiu de Sus may represent allochthonous specimens transported by storms into basinal settings (own observations M.H.). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Bad Vöslau ( +Austria +), +Oberpullendorf Basin: +Ritzing ( +Austria +) (Hörnes 1851; +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +North Alpine Foreland Basin +: Grund ( +Austria +); +Styrian Basin +: Pöls ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Pannonian Basin: +Letkés ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Nemeșești, +Timiș +, Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Boettger 1906 +); +Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin: +Valea Bela Reca ( +Romania +) ( +Hinculov 1968 +); +Dacian Basin: +Opanec ( +Bulgaria +) ( +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +), +southern Pannonian Basin +: Relievac at Prnjavor ( +Bosnia and Herzegovina +) ( +Eremija 1971 +). + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and northeastern Atlantic: +Serravallian (middle Miocene): +Karaman +Basin, +Turkey +( + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +). Tortonian (late Miocene): Cacela Basin, +Portugal +(Pereira da + +Costa +1866 + +); Montegibbio ( +Italy +) ( +Davoli 1972 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF7FFE7FF5FACB9FEC8400F.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF7FFE7FF5FACB9FEC8400F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8eb951fd097 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF7FFE7FF5FACB9FEC8400F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Monteiroconus conicomaculatus +(Sacco, 1893) + + + + + +Figs 17 +P, 24G1–G3 + + + + + +Conus Mercati +Brocc. + +—Hörnes 1851: 23 (partim), pl. 2, figs 3a–c. + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +Mercati +Brocc. + +— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 27 + +(partim). + + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) + +] +conicomaculata +Sacc.— + +Sacco 1893a +: 20 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus mercati in +Hörnes 1851 + +, pl. 2, fig. 3]. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype + +NHMW +1860 + +/0001/0054a, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 2, fig. 3), +Mikulov-Kienberk +( +Czech Republic +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +(late +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material. +Holotype +and 2 spec. + +NHMW +1860 + +/0001/00054, +Mikulov-Kienberk +( +Czech Republic +). + + + + + +Illustrated +material. + + +Figs +17 + +P, 24G1–G3: +Mikulov-Kienberk +( +Czech Republic +): SL: +60.1 mm +, MD: +37.8 mm + +NHMW +1860 + +/0001/00054. + + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized shells with low conical spire consisting of broad, flat to slightly concave spire whorls with weak striae. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Distinct, subangulate shoulder; position of maximum diameter slightly below shoulder. Last whorl broadly conical to weakly ventricose, not constricted; few weak spiral cords on base. Aperture wide with straight outer lip. Siphonal canal wide, short, straight; siphonal fasciole weakly swollen. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of about 12 spirals of wide-spaced subquadratic to elongate rectangular blotches. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +Only +3 specimens +are available: SL: 60.1/53.3/ +49.5 mm +, MD: 37.8/32.9/ +31.3 mm +, spire angle: 118/110/119°, last whorl angle: 41/37/38°, LW: 1.59/1.62/1.58, RD: 0.71/0.72/0.73, PMD: 0.85/ 0.91/0.85, RSH: 0.12/0.14/0.14. + + + + +Discussion. +This species was introduced by +Sacco (1893a) +as variety name of + +Conus mercati +Brocchi, 1814 + +. Morphologically, it is very similar to Pliocene specimens of + +Monteiroconus mercati +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +as shown by +Pinna & Spezia (1978) +and +Hall (1966) +. Nevertheless, it differs in its striate spire whorls, which are smooth in + +M. mercati + +(see discussion in + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +). The smaller size, higher spire and shorter last whorl allow a separation from + +Monteiroconus mojsvari +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +Shallow marine seagrass environments. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Mikulov-Kienberk ( +Czech Republic +) (Hörnes 1851). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF8FFE6FF5FAD61FC6F4516.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF8FFE6FF5FAD61FC6F4516.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c58d4ff6141 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFF8FFE6FF5FAD61FC6F4516.xml @@ -0,0 +1,346 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Monteiroconus boeckhi +(Halaváts, 1884) + + + + + +Figs 17 +O, 24D1–D6, 24E1–E3, 24F1–F3 + + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +Aldrovandi +Brocc. + +— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 25 + +, pl. 4, fig. 2 [non + +Conus aldrovandi +Brocchi, 1814 + +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Böckhi + +nov. form.—Halaváts 1884: 174, pl. 4, figs 1a–c. + + + +[ + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) + +] + +pseudaldrovandi +Sacc. + +— + +Sacco 1893a +: 17 + +[nov. nom. pro + +Conus aldrovandi +in +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 + +, pl. 4, fig. 2]. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +vindobonensis boeckhi +Halaváts, 1884 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 458 + +, pl. 69, figs 1–2. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +The +holotype +was stored in the collection of the +Geological +and +Geophysical Institute +of +Hungary +in +Budapest +but seems to be lost (pers. comm. Klára Palotás); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +(Langhian). +The +type +locality of + +Conus pseudaldrovandi +Sacco, 1893 + +, considered to be a junior synonym of + +M. boeckhi + +, is the middle +Miocene +(Badenian) locality +Ritzing +in +Austria + +. + + +Studied material. +1 spec. NHMW 1870/0037/00021, 1 spec. NHMW 1870/0037/0002, 6 spec. + + +NHMW +1930 + +/ 0006/0037, +Ritzing +( +Austria +). + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 24 +D1–D6, 17O: Ritzing ( +Austria +): SL: +72.6 mm +, MD: +45.5 mm +, +NHMW +1930/0006/ 0037; +Figs 24 +E1–E3: Ritzing ( +Austria +): SL: +81.5 mm +, MD: +51.2 mm +, +NHMW +1870/0037/0002, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 4, fig. 2) +, +holotype +of + +Conus pseudaldrovandi +Sacco, 1893 + +; +Figs 24 +F1–F3: Ritzing ( +Austria +), SL: +54.5 mm +, MD: +31.8 mm +, +NHMW +1930/0006/0037. + + +Revised description. +Moderately large shells, up to +81 mm +in height; about 10 teleoconch whorls; early spire conical with nearly flat, weakly striate to nearly smooth spire whorls; late spire strongly depressed with slightly concave, faintly striate whorls and somewhat irregular, deeply impressed, irregular suture; subsutural flexure deep, strongly curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last whorl conical with distinct shoulder, position of maximum diameter directly below angulation; very weak and somewhat irregular constriction below shoulder within the adapical third and distinct constriction at base. Fasciole short, strongly raised; siphonal canal short, recurved, thickened; inner lip broad, twisted. Colour pattern in UV light comprising axially elongated blotches parallel to the subsutural flexure on spire, slightly narrower than the interspaces; blotches continue via shoulder on last whorl. Last whorl covered by 3–4 broad bands and small dashes and blotches in the interspaces; position of bands variable but typically in some distance from shoulder, at mid-whorl and in lower third of last whorl. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +Only four adult shells are available: largest specimen: SL: +81.5 mm +, MD: +51.2 mm +, mean SL: +73.5 mm +(σ = 5.7), mean MD: +45.5 mm +(σ = 4.2), spire angle (without high conical initial part): µ = 142, 3° (σ = 9.5), last whorl angle: µ = 38.8° (σ = 0.96), LW: µ = 1.6 (σ = 0.07), RD: µ = 0.70 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.95 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.11 (σ = 0.02); the +holotype +is a subadult specimen: SL: +47 mm +, MD: +28 mm +(according to Halaváts 1884). + + + + +Discussion. +The illustration of the +holotype +of + +Monteiroconus boeckhi + +from Hidas shows the characteristic colour pattern, which is also preserved in the specimens from Ritzing. Therefore, + +Conus pseudaldrovandi +Sacco, 1893 + +, which was established by +Sacco (1893a) +for the specimen from Ritzing illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 4, fig. 2) +, is a subjective junior synonym of + +C. boeckhi + +. In their discussion of + +Conus aldrovandi +, Hoernes & Auinger (1979) + +also referred to the specimen from Grund discussed by Hörnes (1851, pl. 1, fig. 2). +Doderlein (1863) +proposed + +Conus hornesi + +as new name for this shell from Grund in +Austria +, which is not conspecific with either + +M. boeckhi + +or + +M. aldrovandi + +. Despite some similarities, the Italian Pliocene + +C. aldrovandi + +differs from both Paratethyan species in its convex spire whorls and the position of the aperture distinctly below the shoulder of the preceding whorl. The lack of spiral striae on the spire allows a clear separation from + +M. mojsvari + +. Moreover, the ice cream cone shaped last whorl, the conspicuous, swollen fasciole and the colour pattern of broad bands allow a separation from all other Paratethyan species. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The mollusc assemblage and geological situation of Ritzing suggests sandy fore shore settings in an embayment of the Pannonian Basin (Harzhauser +et al. +2014 and references therein). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Pannonian Basin: +Hidas ( +Hungary +) (Halaváts 1884); +Oberpullendorf Basin +: Ritzing ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFAFFE9FF5FAA8AFC0045AF.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFAFFE9FF5FAA8AFC0045AF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1014d1b713c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFAFFE9FF5FAA8AFC0045AF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,583 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Monteiroconus antiquus +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + + + + + +Figs 17 +N, 24A1–A3, 24B1–B3, 24C1–C3 + + + + + + +Conus antiquus + +Lamarck 1810 +: 439 + + +. + + + + +Conus Acuminatus + +nobis—Borson 1820: 194, pl. 1, fig. 2 [non + +Conus acuminatus +Bruguière, 1792 + +]. + + + +Conus tarbellianus +Grat. + +—Hörnes 1851: 33, pl. 4, figs 1a–b, 2 [non fig. 3?]. + + + +Conus subacuminatus +d’Orb. + +—d’Orbigny 1852: 5 [nom. nov. pro + +C. acuminatus +Borson, 1820 + +, non +Bruguière, 1792 +]. + + + + +Conus +( +Leptoconus +) +Tarbellianus +Grat. + +var. + +Sharpeanus + +da Costa—Hoernes & + +Auinger 1879 +: 32 + +, pl. 4, fig. 1. [ + +Conus virginalis +Brocc. + +] + +var. +epellus +De Greg. + +— + +De Gregorio 1885 +: 364 + +. + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +subacuminatus +(d’Orbigny) + +— + +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956 +: 420 + +, pl. 11, figs 5–6. + + + + + + + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +subacuminatus +d’Orbigny, 1852 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 454 + +, pl. 67, fig. 13. + + + +? + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +subacuminatus + +d’Orbigny—Bohn-Havas 1973: 1069, pl. 7, fig. 10. + + + +? + +Conus antiqus + +[sic] Lamarck– + +Chira & Voia 2001 +: 156 + +, pl. 1, figs 3a–b. + + + + + + + +Monteiroconus antiquus +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +— + + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +: 241 + +, pl. 38, figs 5–6, pl. 41, fig. 10, pl. 42, fig. 4, pl. 81, figs 4– 5 [cum syn.]. + + + + +non + +Conus +( +Lithoconus +) +antiquus concavespira +(Sacco, 1893) + +— + +Atanacković 1985 +: 180 + +, pl. 40, figs 7–10. non + +Lithoconus antiquus +( +Lamarck, 1810 +) + +— + +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +: 74 + +, figs 74–76. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Lectotype +catalogue number +MNHN +B35774, stored in the Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris; no detailed locality given; +Piedmont +Italy +, probably Burdigalian (early Miocene). This specimen was found again in the Paris collection in the 1980s (Ferrero-Mortara +et al +. 1984). Therefore, +Hall (1966) +considered the +type +specimen as lost and designated a +neotype +based on a +Burdigalian +specimen from the +Turin Hills +in the +Saccocollection +of the +Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali +, +Torino +(BS.038.02.021). + + + +Studied material. +1 spec. NHMW 1853/0003/0007, 1 spec. NHMW 1846/0037/0035, 2 spec. NHMW 1855/ 0014/0364, 3 spec. NHMW 1856/0001/0364, 2 spec. NHMW 1856/0004/0034, 1 spec. NHMW 1856/0050/0112, 1 spec. NHMW 1863/0015/1283, 2 spec. NHMW 1997z0178/1480, 1 spec. NHMW 1970/1396/1486, 9 spec. NHMW 2013/0479/2041, 2 spec. + + +NHMW +2013 + +/0479/1623, GBA 1856/004/0003, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 4, fig. 1), all +Gainfarn +( +Austria +); 4 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1858 + +/0015/0067, +Steinebrunn +( +Austria +); 2 spec + +. NHMW 1860/ 0001/0063, 1 spec. + + +NHMW +1851 + +/0010/0007, illustrated in +Hörnes +(1851, pl. 4, fig. 2), 1 spec + +. + + +NHMW +1850 + +/0001/ 0 0 54, illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 4, fig. 1) + +, all +Mikulov-Kienberk +( +Czech Republic +). + + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 24A +1 +–A3: SL: +137.3 mm +, MD: +68.7 mm +, + +NHMW +2016 + +/0048/0001; all +Gainfarn +( +Austria +) + +; +Figs 24 +B1–B3, 17N: SL: +109.8 mm +, MD: +49.1 mm +, NHMW 1970/1396/1486; +Figs 24 +C1–C3: SL: +128.4 mm +, MD: +59.9 mm +, NHMW 1856/0050/0112. + + + + +Description: +Large shells with low, coeloconoid spire. Early spire whorls angulated, later distinctly concave with spiral striae, which are most prominent on the adapical half of the whorls. Subsutural flexure moderately deep, moderately curved, strongly asymmetrical. Last whorl elongate, straight-sided; position of maximum diameter close below shoulder; weakly constricted at base. Weak spiral grooves on abapical third of last whorl are usually developed and become stronger and more closely spaced abapically. Aperture narrow, straight, slightly narrowed in middle part. Siphonal canal long, weakly recurved posteriorly with broad, rounded fasciole. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of numerous, thin, continuous and regular brown spiral lines covering the entire last whorl. + + + +FIGURE 24A1–A3. + +Monteiroconus antiquus +(Lamarck, 1810) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 2016/0048/0001. +24B1–B3. + +Monteiroconus antiquus +(Lamarck, 1810) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1970/1396/1486. +24C1–C3. + +Monteiroconus antiquus +(Lamarck, 1810) + +, Gainfarn (Austria), NHMW 1856/0050/0112. +24D1–D6. + +Monteiroconus boeckhi +(Halaváts, 1884) + +, Ritzing (Austria), NHMW 1930/0006/0037. +24E1–E3. + +Monteiroconus boeckhi +(Halaváts, 1884) + +, Ritzing (Austria), NHMW 1870/0037/ 0 0 0 2. +24F1–F3 +. + +Monteiroconus boeckhi +(Halaváts, 1884) + +, Ritzing (Austria), NHMW 1930/0006/0037. +24G1–G3. + +Monteiroconus conicomaculatus +(Sacco, 1893) + +, Mikulov-Kienberk (Czech Republic), NHMW 1860/0001/00054. + + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +n = +10 adult +and subadult specimens: largest specimen: SL: +128.4 mm +, MD: +59.9 mm +, mean SL: +107.9 mm +(σ = 14.2), mean MD: +51.12 mm +(σ = 6.5), spire angle: µ = 107.9° (σ = 8.8°), last whorl angle: µ = 26° (σ = 1.9°), LW: µ = 2.1 (σ = 0.1), RD: µ = 0.56 (σ = 0.03), PMD: µ = 0.94 (σ = 0.03), RSH: µ = 0.16 (σ = 0.03). + + + + +Discussion. +This species is an outlier within + +Monteiroconus + +concerning the strongly elongate last whorl. Nevertheless, we follow +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +and place it in + +Monteiroconus + +based on its genus-typical spire and sculpture. The colour pattern of Serravallian specimens of + +M. antiquus + +from the +Karaman +Basin in +Turkey +consists of narrow, axially arranged flammules ( + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +), thus differing from the Paratethyan shell with densely spaced, continuous spirals. Comparable patterns, however, are also documented from Tortonian shells from Montegibbio ( +Italy +) (see +Davoli 1972 +). This is among the largest cone shells in the Paratethys and is recognized easily by its slender shell with short coeloconoid spire and concave spire whorls. +Hoernes & Auinger (1879) +illustrated a rather bulky subadult shell, which they identified with the smaller and shorter + +Conus sharpeanus +Pereira + +da + +Costa +, 1866 + +. +De Gregorio (1885) +introduced +epellus +as new name for the specimens illustrated in Hörnes (1851, pl. 4, figs 1–3), which is considered herein to be a subjective junior synonym of + +Conus antiquus +Lamarck, 1810 + +. The juvenile specimen illustrated by Hörnes (1851, pl. 4, fig 3.) was excluded by +Hall (1966) +from + +C. antiquus + +and placed it in + +Plagioconus elatus +( +Michelotti, 1847 +) + +. Unfortunately, this specimen is lost and its status remains unclear. + + +Paleoenvironment. + +Monteiroconus antiquus + +occurs only in shallow sublittoral settings. At localities, such as Gainfarn and Mikulov it was inhabiting sea grass meadows ( + +Zuschin +et al. +2007 + +). + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): + +Vienna +Basin: + +Gainfarn, Steinebrunn, Pötzleinsdorf ( +Austria +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +; +Sieber 1958b +), Mikulov-Kienberk ( +Czech Republic +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Pannonian Basin: +Pécsszabolcs, Szob ( +Hungary +) ( +Strausz 1966 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Chira & Voia 2001 +). + + +Proto-Mediterranean Sea and northeastern Atlantic. +Widespread during the early Miocene to late Miocene in the northeastern Atlantic and the Proto-Mediterranean Sea; the species persists into the Pliocene in the Mediterranean Sea (see + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +for detailed references). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFBFFEAFF5FA989FE444791.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFBFFEAFF5FA989FE444791.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..18359a7b075 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFBFFEAFF5FA989FE444791.xml @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Leporiconus transsylvanicus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 17 +M, +23I1–I5 +, +Figs 23 +J1–J3 + + + + + +[ + +Chelyconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Transsylvanicus + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Transsylvanicus + +nov. form.— + +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 41 + +, pl. 1, fig. 14. [ + +Conus + +] +C. +[ +helyconus +] +transsilvanicus +[sic] H. et A.— + +Sacco 1893b +: 64 + +, 67. + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Syntype + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0034a, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +), illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 1, fig. 14) + + +; + +4 syntypes + +NHMW +1854 + +/0035/0034, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes. + + +Illustrated material. + +Figs +23 + +I1–I5, 17M: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +49.8 mm +, MD: +21.5 mm +, +NHMW +1854/0035/0034a, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 14) +; +Figs 23 +J1–J3: +syntype +, Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +): SL: +52.5 mm +, MD: +21.2 mm +, +NHMW +1854/0035/0034. + + +Revised description. +Medium-sized torpedo-shaped shells; broad mammillate spire with pointed apex and strongly tuberculate above suture on early whorls; later spire whorls nearly flat, striate; suture impressed; subsutural flexure shallow, weakly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Indistinct shoulder coinciding with position of maximum diameter. Last whorl narrowly elongate, faintly convex, weakly constricted close to moderately long, slightly recurved siphonal canal. Aperture narrow, only slightly widening towards siphonal canal. Siphonal fasciole indistinct, twisted, poorly demarcated from thin, narrow inner lip. Sculpture of last whorl consisting of pustulose cords on lower half of whorl, becoming very weak and smooth in upper part. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of weak flammulae on shoulder and narrow spirals of long dashes and speckles forming nearly continuous spiral lines on last whorl. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 5: largest specimen: SL: +52.5 mm +, MD: +21.2 mm +, mean SL: +47.1 mm +(σ = 5.8), mean MD: +19.9 mm +(σ = 2.1), spire angle: µ = 84.6° (σ = 4.5°), last whorl angle: µ = 29.2° (σ = 1.5°), LW: µ = 2.4 (σ = 0.08), RD: µ = 0.51 (σ = 0.02), PMD: µ = 0.87 (σ = 0.04), RSH: µ = 0.17 (σ = 0.02). + + + + +Discussion. +This rare species agrees in all aspects with the definition of + +Leporiconus +Iredale, 1930 + +by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +. Aside from the general shell shape with the typical dome-shaped spire, especially the pustulose spiral cords, the tuberculate early spire whorls, the striate spire whorls and the shallow subsutural flexure support the placement in this genus. It differs from its Paratethyan congeners in being more elongated and obviously torpedo-shaped and in having a domed spire with a pointed tip. Among the modern representatives of this genus, the Indo-West Pacific species + +Leporiconus tenuistriatus + +( +Sowerby II, 1858 +), + +Leporiconus granum +( +Röckel & Fischöder, 1985 +) + +and + +Leporiconus nucleus +( +Reeve, 1848 +) + +are highly reminiscent of + +L. transsylvanicus + +. + + +Paleoenvironment. +No information. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFBFFEBFF5FAF39FC4443C2.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFBFFEBFF5FAF39FC4443C2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..85a07b52edb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFBFFEBFF5FAF39FC4443C2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + +Genus + +Monteiroconus +da +Motta, 1991 + + + + + + + + +Type +species (by original designation): + +Conus ambiguus +Reeve, 1844 + +. +Recent +, +West Africa. + + + +Note. +According to +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +, shells of the genus + +Monteiroconus +da +Motta, 1991 + +are characterised by having concave spire whorls with cords present or absent; the spire may be convex in profile; the subsutural sinus is shallow to moderately deep, and the protoconch is multispiral. The genus has a rich European fossil record and today has a West African distribution. The molecular phylogeny presented by + +Puillandre +et al +. (2014a) + +confirmed the group to be monophyletic, although the authors recognise these groups at subgenus level. However, they also included two species ( + +C. gladiator +Broderip, 1833 + +and + +C. mus +Hwass in +Brugière, 1792 + +), which one would not have expected based on shell characters, as both of these species have coarse tubercles on the spire whorls. Moreover, they both have a Caribbean distribution, whereas + +Monteiroconus + +as defined by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +is West African. We provisionally restrict the usage of the genus to that suggested by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +. + + + + + +Monteiroconus + +is a speciose conid genus in the Paratethyan assemblages. Based on these species we add that the genus is characterised by moderately large to large-sized, relatively solid shells. The spire is low to almost flat and in most species the spire whorls are striate. Often, spire whorls are bulgy along the lower suture. The subsutural flexures in all the species treated here are medium deep to deep, moderately to strongly curved and moderately to strongly asymmetrical. The relative diameter of the last whorl and length of the siphonal canal are variable but generally species have a wide to moderately wide last whorl. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFCFFEAFF5FA8E1FEFF40C7.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFCFFEAFF5FA8E1FEFF40C7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a8a38d24182 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFCFFEAFF5FA8E1FEFF40C7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,495 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Leporiconus suessi +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + + + + + +Figs 17 +L, 23D1–D2, 23E1–E2, 23F1–F3, 23G1–G2, 23H + + + + + +[ + +Chelyconus + +] [ + +Conus + +] + +Suessi + +n. f.— + +Hoernes 1878a +: 195 + +(nomen nudum). + + + +C. +[ +onus +] + +Suessi + +— +Hoernes 1878b +: 207 (nomen nudum). + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +Suessi + +nov. form.— +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +: 43, pl. 1, figs 1, 15, pl. 6, figs 1–2 [non pl. 6, figs 3–4 = + +Conus + +s.l. + +posticestriatus +(Kojumdgieva in +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov, 1960 +) + +]. + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +suessi +Hoernes + +et Auinger—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 420, pl. 3, fig. 8. + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +suessi +Hoernes und Auinger 1879 + +—Kojumdgieva in + +Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960 +: 212 + +, pl. 49, fig. 8. + + + + + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +suessi +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +— + +Strausz 1966 +: 459 + +, pl. 69, fig. 6. + + + + +Varioconus pelagicus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +— +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +(partim): 87, figs 131–137 [non + +Lautoconus pelagicus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + + +non + +Conus +( +Chelyconus +) +suessi concavospira + +n. spp.— + +Csepreghy-Meznerics 1972 +: 33 + +, pl. 17, fig. 21 (nomen nudum). + + + + + + + +Type +material. + +The +syntype +illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 1) +was stored in the collections of the Geological Survey of +Austria +(GBA), but seems to be lost. Other +syntypes +: + +NHMW +1858 + +/0043/0001a, illustrated in + +Hoernes +& +Auinger +(1879, pl. 6, fig. 1) + + +, syntype NHMW 1854/0035/0033, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig. 2) +, syntype NHMW 1858/0043/0001b, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig.15) +, 2 syntypes NHMW 1858/0043/0001a, 4 syntypes NHMW A457, + +5 syntypes + +NHMW +1868 + +/0001/0386, all +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +); middle +Miocene +, +Badenian +( +Langhian +). + + + + +Studied material. +Syntypes +and 6 spec. + +NHMW +1865 + +/0001/0158, +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +). + + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 23 +D1–D2: +syntype +, SL: +44.1 mm +, MD: +19.8 mm +, + +NHMW +1858 + +/0043/0001b, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 1, fig. 15) +; +Figs 23 +E1–E2: +syntype +, SL: +64.6 mm +, MD: 29.0 mm, +NHMW +A457; +Figs 23 +F1–F3: +syntype +, SL: +63.6 mm +, MD: +29.4 mm +, + +NHMW +1858 + +/0043/0001a, illustrated in +Hoernes & Auinger (1879, pl. 6, fig. 1) +; +Fig. 23 +H: SL: 55.6, MD: +23.4 mm +, + +NHMW +1865 + +/0001/0158; +Figs 23 +G1– G2: SL: 72.3, MD: +32.3 mm +, + +NHMW +1865 + +/0001/0158; + +Fig. +17 + +L: +syntype +, SL: +51.2 mm +, MD: +23.3 mm +, +NHMW +A457a; all +Lăpugiu de Sus +( +Romania +) + +. + + +Revised description. +Moderately large, not very solid, biconical shells; straight-sided conical spire; early spire whorls tuberculate; later spire whorls flat, striate; suture moderately incised, undulating; last spire whorl forming flat to weakly concave sutural ramp passing via distinct, slightly angulated shoulder into elongate, feebly convex last whorl. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Aperture narrow with straight outer lip, slightly widening towards short, straight, weakly recurved siphonal canal; fasciole indistinct, slightly swollen. Sculpture consisting of delicate, finely pustulose spiral threads on the entire whorl in subadult shells; beads are successively reduced during ontogeny; fully-grown specimens develop only weak spiral cords on base. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of densely spaced thin, continuous spiral lines and broad flammulae on spire whorls, becoming axially elongate opisthocline on shoulder. Last whorl with moderately broad discontinuous bands with axial streaks aligned with the axis of coiling. + + + + +Shell measurements and ratios +. n = 7: largest specimen: SL: +68.9 mm +, MD: +30.5 mm +, mean SL: +56.8 mm +(σ = 9.7), mean MD: +25.7 mm +(σ = 4.1), spire angle: µ = 88.6° (σ = 6.0°), last whorl angle: µ = 31.3° (σ = 1.8°), LW: µ = 2.2 (σ = 0.07), RD: µ = 0.54 (σ = 0.01), PMD: µ = 0.89 (σ = 0.02), RSH: µ = 0.16 (σ = 0.02). + + + + +Discussion. +We place this species in + +Leporiconus + +based on the pustulose spiral cords, the tuberculate early spire whorls and the striate spire whorls, which contradict a placement in + +Varioconus + +(= + +Lautoconus + +) as proposed by +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +. A modern look-alike of + +Leporiconus suessi + +is the Indo-West Pacific + +Leporiconus corallinus +(Kiener, 1847) + +. This species was synonymized with + +Lautoconus pelagicus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +by +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +, but the Miocene to Pliocene + +L. pelagicus + +, as described by +Hall (1966) +, +Pinna & Spezia (1978) +, Muñiz +Solís (1999) +and + +Landau +et al +. (2013) + +, differs in its larger size, the more convex spire whorls, the broader last whorl, which lacks the slight angulation and tends to be slightly ventricose, and its colour pattern of spirally arranged blotches (see + +Landau +et al +. 2013 + +). + + + + + +Conus suessi concavospira +Csepreghy-Meznerics, 1972 + +is a nomen nudum. The subadult specimen illustrated by +Csepreghy-Meznerics (1972) +is probably unrelated with + +Leporiconus suessi + +but a clear identification is impossible. + + + +Leporiconus suessi + +differs from + +Leporiconus transsylvanicus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +in the conical spire, the angulated shoulder and the conical last whorl; the beads of + +L. transsylvanicus + +are much coarser, present also in fully grown specimens and the colour pattern consists of wider spaced spirals of long dashes and speckles. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The sandy sediment infill with elphidiid foraminifers suggests a nearshore environment. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin: +Forchtenau ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +); +Pannonian Basin: +Borsodbóta, Diósd, Letkés, Szob, +Budapest +: Illés street, Örs vezér square ( +Hungary +) ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); +Transylvanian Basin: +Lăpugiu de Sus, Coşteiu de Sus ( +Romania +) ( +Hoernes & Auinger 1879 +). The occurrence of this species in the Tortonian of Barcelona, mentioned by Faura I Sans (1908), needs confirmation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFEFFEFFF5FAA31FB7F468B.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFEFFEFFF5FAA31FB7F468B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..37d61e06ab1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFEFFEFFF5FAA31FB7F468B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,248 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Leporiconus paratethyianus + +nov. sp. + + + + +Figs 17 +K, 23A1–A3, 23B1–B3, 23C1–C3 + + + + +? + +Varioconus pelagicus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +— +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +(partim): 87 [non + +Lautoconus pelagicus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + + + +Holotype: +Figs 23A +1 +–A3, 17K: SL: +34.6 mm +, MD: +17.8 mm +, NHMW 2016/0005/0001. + + +Paratype: +Figs 23 +B1–B3: SL: +32.6 mm +, MD: +16.3 mm +, NHMW 2016/0005/0002. + + + + +Paratype: +Figs 23 +C1–C2: SL: +30.8 mm +, MD: +16.9 mm +, NHMW 2016/0005/0003a. + + + + + +Additional material: +1 specimen + +NHMW +2016 + +/0005/0003, all specimens from +Letkés +, +Hungary +. + + + +Type stratum: +fossil-rich marly sand with coral blocks and andesite boulders of the Sámsonháza Formation ( +Császár 1997 +). + + + + +Type +locality: + +Letkés +at the western part of the +Börzsöny Mts. +( +Hungary +); see + +Kovács +& +Vicián +(2013) + +for a map and description. + + + +Age: +Middle Miocene, early Badenian (= Langhian). + + + + +Etymology: +Referring to the Paratethys Sea. + + + + +Description. +Moderately small biconical to stout torpedo-shaped shell with moderately high conical to weakly cyrtoconoid spire and conical last whorl. Early spire whorls gradate, tuberculate along lower suture, striate; later spire whorls high, moderately convex, distinctly striate; suture impressed, narrowly canaliculated, undulating. Subsutural flexure shallow, weakly curved, moderately asymmetrical. Last whorl conical, squat, with broadly rounded, sometimes weakly angulated rounded shoulder; not constricted at base. Narrow aperture strongly narrowing at posterior canal, weakly broadening towards short, straight siphonal canal. Siphonal fasciole indistinct. Sculpture of last whorl consisting of densely spaced spirals of tiny beads, which are also roughly axially arranged. Lower half of last whorl with prominent, beaded spiral cords. Colour pattern under UV light consisting of narrow, axially elongate flammulae on spire whorls and very dense, regular pattern of spirally arranged tiny dots, coinciding with beads on last whorl. + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +Only +4 specimens +are available, of these three are adult: SL: 34.6/32.6/ +30.8 mm +, MD: 17,8/16.3/ +16.9 mm +, spire angle: 85/83/98°, last whorl angle: 39/37/36°, LW: 1.94/2.00/1.82, RD: 0.70/ 0.68/0.66, PMD: 0.86/0.83/0.79, RSH: 0.26/0.26/0.17. + + + + +Discussion. +We place this species in + +Leporiconus + +based on the beaded spiral cords, the tuberculate early spire whorls and the striate spire whorls. The tiny dotted colour pattern coinciding with the beads is also seen in the +type +species + +L. glans + +. This is a very peculiar species, which is characterised by its stout torpedo-shaped outline and the densely beaded sculpture. In their paper on the +Conidae +from Letkés, +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +might have partly referred to this species as + +Lautoconus pelagicus +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +as they mention beads and small tubercles in their description. + +Lautoconus pelagicus + +differs in its larger size, smooth shell surface, slightly recurved siphonal canal and completely different colour pattern (se +Pinna & Spezia 1978 +; + +Landau +et. al +. 2013 + +). + +Leporiconus transsylvanicus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +is congeneric, but differs in its more slender torpedo-like shell with a longer last whorl, higher position of the shoulder, lower spire and less prominent sculpture. + + +Paleoenvironment. +The locality Letkés comprises a mixed assemblage of partly reworked taxa ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); the frequent occurrence of corals suggests a shallow marine depositional environment. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): +Pannonian Basin: +Letkés ( +Hungary +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFFFFEEFF5FA8CAFB7945D4.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFFFFEEFF5FA8CAFB7945D4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fd936ca572e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFFFFEEFF5FA8CAFB7945D4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + + +Lautoconus + +nov. sp. [ex. gr. + +bitorosus +Fontannes, 1880 + +] + + + + +Figs 17 +G, 22A1–A3 + + + + + +Monteiroconus mercati +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +.— +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +(partim): 78, figs 87–88 [non + +Monteiroconus mercati +( +Brocchi, 1814 +) + +]. + + + + +Illustrated material. +Figs 22A +1 +–A3, 17G: Letkés (Hungary): SL: +55.3 mm +, MD: +31.9 mm +, private collection Anton Breitenberger (Bad Vöslau, Austria). + + + + +Description. +Medium-sized shells of subcylindrical outline. Spire very low; suture impressed. Early spire whorls smooth, weakly convex; last whorl smooth with faint central concavity. Subsutural flexure shallow, moderately curved, moderately asymmetrical. Distinctly angulated shoulder, position of maximum diameter somewhat below shoulder. Last whorl slightly ventricose, subcylindrical; weakly constricted at base. Surface smooth except for prominent spiral cords on base. Siphonal fasciole weakly swollen, twisted, separated from short inner lip by slight notch. Siphonal canal short, broad, slightly recurved. Aperture moderately narrow, widening anteriorly. + + +Shell measurements and ratios. +SL: +55.3 mm +, MD: +31.9 mm +, spire angle: 130°, last whorl angle: 37°, LW: 1.73, RD: 0.65, PMD: 81, RSH: 0.11. + + + + + +Discussion. +Only a single specimen is available to us. However, a second specimen from the same locality, stored in the Hungarian Natural History Museum ( + +HNHM +2013.213 + +), was illustrated by +Kovács & Vicián (2013) +. Both specimens are identical in outline and therefore, it is unlikely that they represent aberrant specimens. This species is reminiscent of + +Lautoconus bitorosus miovoeslauensis +(Sacco, 1893) + +but differs in its subcylindrical outline, the smooth spire and the pronounced shoulder. Moreover, both species seem also to be ecologically separated. + +Lautoconus b. miovoeslauensis + +is found in offshore clays whereas the occurrence at Letkés indicates shallow marine environments with corals. Despite the numerous “varieties” described by +Sacco (1893a +, +b +), we are not aware of any comparably cylindrical morphotype. Nevertheless, we refrain from formally introducing a new species name without having seen more material. + + + +Paleoenvironment +. The locality Letkés comprises a mixed assemblage of partly reworked taxa ( +Kovács & Vicián 2013 +); the frequent occurrence of corals suggests a shallow marine depositional environment. + + + + +Distribution in Paratethys. +Badenian (middle Miocene): Pannonian Basin: Letkés ( +Hungary +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFFFFEFFF5FAD67FB6D409F.xml b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFFFFEFFF5FAD67FB6D409F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7814f9abdf6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/87/373F87D7FFFFFFEFFF5FAD67FB6D409F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,278 @@ + + + +A revision of the Neogene Conidae and Conorbidae (Gastropoda) of the Paratethys Sea + + + +Author + +Harzhauser, Mathias + + + +Author + +Landau, Bernard + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4210 + + +1 + + +1 +178 + + + +journal article +37280 +10.11646/zootaxa.4210.1.1 +e782e07d-76b7-4e9b-ba34-ed3286254ec6 +1175-5326 +252966 +D39416B8-CF85-440B-84C2-D4380BECC4E3 + + + + + + +Genus + +Leporiconus +Iredale, 1930 + + + + + + + +Type species (by original designation): + +Conus glans +Hwass in +Bruguière, 1792 + +. Recent, Indian Ocean. + + +Note. +According to +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +the genus + +Leporiconus +Iredale, 1930 + +is characterised by subcylindrical to pyriform, sometimes torpedo shaped shells, with beaded early spire whorls, two or more cords on the spire whorls and ridges on the body whorl, which are usually well developed and pustulose. The shoulder is rounded to indistinct. The subsutural flexures of the Paratethyan species are shallow, weakly to moderately curved and moderately asymmetrical and the protoconch is multispiral. The generic description given by +Tucker & Tenorio (2009) +was based on the species considered by these authors to be included in the genus: + +C. glans +Hwass in +Bruguière, 1792 + +, + +C. caffeae +Gmelin, 1791 + +, + +C. corallinus +Kiener, 1845 + +, + +C. cylindraceus +Broderip & Sowerby I, 1830 + +, + +C. granum +Röckel & Fischöder, 1985 + +, + +C. luteus +Sowerby I, 1833 + +, + +C. mitratus +Hwass in +Bruguière, 1792 + +, + +C. nucleus +Reeve, 1848 + +and + +C. tenuistriatus +Sowerby II, 1858 + +. However, + +Puillandre +et al. +(2014b) + +defined + +Leporiconus + +as a monophyletic clade containing five of the species included by Tucker & Tenorio: + +C. coffeae +, +C. glans +, +C. granum +, +C. luteus + +, and + +C. tenuistriatus + +, but excluded + +C. nucleus + +and + +C. corallinus + +, which they placed in the closely related genus +Splinoconu +s da +Motta, 1991 +. + +Conus cylindraceus + +and + +C. mitratus + +they placed in the genus + +Turriconus +Shikama & Habe, 1968 + +, which is not closely related to + +Leporiconus + +. Therefore, the generic description should be modified to include only the species shown to be monophyletic by + +Puillandre +et al. +(2014b) + +. The wording given above still applies to the genus, as recognised by + +Puillandre +et al. +(2014b) + +, but torpedo-shaped shells should be removed, as the two species now included in + +Turriconus + +are more slender torpedo shaped, with far higher spires than species in + +Leporiconus + +. We cannot see any reliable shell characters by which to separate the present-day species of + +Leporiconus + +and + +Splinoconus + +, except that the spiral sculpture seems to be less prominent in + +Splinoconus + +. This not surprising as the two genera are closely related ( + +Puillandre +et al. +2014b + +; fig 2). + + +We have attributed to this genus a small number of Paratethyan species of which one, + +Leporiconus transsylvanicus +( +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 +) + +is remarkably similar to the type species + +L. glans +(Hwass in +Bruguière, 1792 +) + +. The other species are less obviously torpedo-shaped, but all have beaded early spire whorls. + +Conus transsylvanicus + +and + +C. suessi +Hoernes & Auinger, 1879 + +were placed in the genus + +Varioconus +da + +Motta +1991 + + +in a unpublished generic list made available to us by J.K. Tucker (personal comm. 2016), however, + +Varioconus + +(considered as synonym of + +Lautoconus + +by + +Puillandre +et al +. 2014a + +) lacks beads on spire whorls. + + +The presence of + +Leporiconus + +in the Miocene Paratethys is interesting, as it documents the wide post-Tethyan distribution of a taxon during middle Miocene times nowadays restricted to the Indo-West Pacific. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/3F/B4/373FB4D245B6D8FEB2E43464ED8C9C07.xml b/data/37/3F/B4/373FB4D245B6D8FEB2E43464ED8C9C07.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cb557ae4fce --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/3F/B4/373FB4D245B6D8FEB2E43464ED8C9C07.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +New Coleoptera records from New Brunswick, Canada: Elateridae + + + +Author + +Webster, Reginald P. + + + +Author + +Sweeney, Jon D. + + + +Author + +DeMerchant, Ian + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +179 + + +93 +113 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.179.2603 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.179.2603 +1313-2970-179-93 + + + + +Elathous discalceatus (Say, 1839) +Map 4 + + + +Material examined. + +New Brunswick, Carleton Co., Jackson Falls, Bell Forest, +46.2200°N +, +67.7231°W +, 19-28.VII.2008, R. P. Webster, mature hardwood forest, +Lindgren +funnel trap (1, RWC). York Co., 15 km W of Tracy off Rt. 645, +45.6848°N +, +66.8821°W +, 4-11.VIII.2009, R. Webster & M.-A. +Giguere +, old red pine forest, Lindgren funnel trap (1, RWC); same locality data, 27. +VII- +10.VIII.2010, R. Webster & C. Hughes, Lindgren funnel traps (3, AFC, RWC). + + + +Collection and habitat data. +Adults were captured during late July and August in Lindgren funnel traps in a mature hardwood forest with American beech, sugar maple, and white ash, and in an old red pine forest. + + +Distribution in Canada and Alaska. + +ON, QC, NB, NS ( +Bousquet 1991 +). + + + +Map 4. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of +Elathous discalceatus. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/40/CC/3740CC268B6C56D24EB17AC9B4AC86F8.xml b/data/37/40/CC/3740CC268B6C56D24EB17AC9B4AC86F8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a54a27d289d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/40/CC/3740CC268B6C56D24EB17AC9B4AC86F8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part N) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +690 +695 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Nepeta sibirica +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 572. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Sibiria." RCN: 4321. + + + +Basionym of: + +Dracocephalum sibiricum +(L.) L. (1759) + +. + + + + +Lectotype +(Hedge in Jarvis & al. in +Taxon +50: 511. 2001): [icon] +"Cataria montana, folio Veronicae pratensis" +in Buxbaum, Pl. Minus Cognit. Cent. 3: 27, t. 50, f. 1. 1729. + + + + +Current name: + +Nepeta sibirien +L. + +( +Lamiaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/41/2D/37412D6724CB9B5DF237499D5F437897.xml b/data/37/41/2D/37412D6724CB9B5DF237499D5F437897.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6606c5c1135 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/41/2D/37412D6724CB9B5DF237499D5F437897.xml @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + +Guide to the Vascular Flora of the Savannas and Flatwoods of Shaken Creek Preserve and Vicinity (Pender & Onslow Counties, North Carolina, U. S. A.) + + + +Author + +Thornhill, Robert + + + +Author + +Krings, Alexander + + + +Author + +Lindbo, David + + + +Author + +Stucky, Jon + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1099 +1099 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1099 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1099 +1314-2828-2-1099 + + + + +Panicum dichotomiflorum var. puritanorum Svenson + + + +Ecological interactions + +Conservation status +SR-P; S1, G5T4. + + + +Distribution +Wet pine savannas (SPS-T). + + +Notes + +Rare. +Jul-Oct +. Thornhill 935 (NCSC). [= +Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx. subsp. puritanorum +(Svenson) Freckmann & Lelong sensu FNA; = Weakley] + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/41/68/37416868976BCEAB1EB10F832862C398.xml b/data/37/41/68/37416868976BCEAB1EB10F832862C398.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b61ed94327c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/41/68/37416868976BCEAB1EB10F832862C398.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +Synopsis of Central Andean Orthalicoid land snails (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora), excluding Bulimulidae + + + +Author + +Breure, Abraham S. H. + + + +Author + +Avila, Valentin Mogollon + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +588 + + +1 +199 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.588.7906 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.588.7906 +1313-2970-588-1 +EC4E9A71F7B948D2B245F8DA8C0907FA + + + + +Taxon +classification Animalia Stylommatophora Orthalicidae + + + + +Scholvienia claritae (Strebel, 1910) +Figs 65G, 67 + + + + +Thomsenia claritae +Strebel 1910 +: 27, pl. 2 fig. 16. + + +Thaumastus claritae +; +Richardson 1995 +: (references). + + +Thaumastus (Scholvienia) claritae +; + +Ramirez +et al. 2003 + +: 282. + + + +Type locality. +"Chanchamayo, Peru". + + +Type material. +Not located, see remarks. + + +Diagnosis. + +Shell relatively large, and slender (height/diameter ratio 2.3), uniformly +"kaffee-braun" +. + + + +Dimensions. +Shell height 61.2, diameter 28.0 mm. + + +Distribution. + +Peru, Dept. +Junin +, Chanchamayo valley. + + + +Ecoregion. +Peruvian Yungas [NT0153]. + + +Remarks. + +This species, described from a single, (supposedly subadult) shell in the O. Semper collection, was used by Strebel to erect a monotypic subgenus +Thomsenia +. +Breure (1979 +: 46) pointed out that the type material was probably lost during World War 2, and treated this taxon as nomen inquirendum. He suggested it might belong to +Scholvienia +. +Strebel (1910 +: 26) said both protoconch and teleoconch sculpture were the same as in +Scholvienia porphyria +(Pfeiffer, 1847), +Scholvienia jaspidea +(Morelet, 1863), +Scholvienia jelskii +(Lubomirski, 1880), +Scholvienia iserni +(Philippi, 1867), and +Scholvienia huancabambensis +Strebel, 1910. Therefore. we fail to see the need for a separate subgenus, and +Thomsenia +is now considered a junior subjective synonym of +Scholvienia +Strebel, 1910 (syn. n.). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/41/73/37417372487F50955415BF147055DF2C.xml b/data/37/41/73/37417372487F50955415BF147055DF2C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2d47397652d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/41/73/37417372487F50955415BF147055DF2C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Pheidole in the New World. A dominant, hyperdiverse ant genus. + + + +Author + +Wilson, E. O. + +text + +2003 +Harvard University Press + +Cambridge, MA, USA + + + +http://atbi.biosci.ohio-state.edu/HymOnline/reference-full.html?id=20017 + +book +20017 + + + + +Pheidole strigosa +new species + +Types Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard. + + + +Etymology L +strigosa +, thin, lean. + + + + +diagnosis A member of the +diligens +group similar to +alfaroi +, +laticornis +, and +seligmanni +, distinguished from these and other +diligens +group species by the following combination of traits. + + + +Major: head elongate, with deeply convex occipital border seen in full-face view; pronotum bilobous in dorsal-oblique view; propodeal spines reduced to denticles; postpetiole from above bell-shaped; sculpturing of head limited to carinulae on the anterior third. +Minor: propodeal spines absent, with the basal and declivitous faces of the propodeum joining in a smooth convexity; occiput narrow, with a nuchal collar. +Measurements (mm) Holotype major: HW 1.14, HL 1.40, SL 1.00, EL 0.18, PW 0.64. +Paratype minor: HW 0.56, HL 0.72, SL 0.96, EL 0.14, PW 0.40. +Color Major: body, mandibles, and scape medium yellowish brown, legs yellow. +Minor: head medium brown with yellow anterior genal border; rest of body light brown; appendages yellow. + + +Range Known only from the type locality. + + +Biology Collected from the floor of lowland rainforest. + + +Figure Upper: holotype, major. Lower: paratype, minor. BRAZIL: Taperinha Santarem, Para, 2°54'S 54°20'W (Robert L. Jeanne). Scale bars = 1 mm. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/41/74/3741744778ABCDB23944190F5B36A993.xml b/data/37/41/74/3741744778ABCDB23944190F5B36A993.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..179b687b279 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/41/74/3741744778ABCDB23944190F5B36A993.xml @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + +New distributional data on aquatic and semiaquatic bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha & Nepomorpha) from South America + + + +Author + +Cordeiro, Isabelle R S + + + +Author + +Moreira, Felipe F F + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +4913 +4913 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4913 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4913 +1314-2828--4913 + + + + +Rheumatobates bonariensis (Berg, 1898) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: individualCount: +1 +; sex: +1 macropterous male +; Taxon: genus: Rheumatobates; specificEpithet: bonariensis; Location: continent: South America; country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: Mato Grosso; municipality: Barra do +Garcas +; locality: + +Papagaio, 4ª ordem, +superificie +20 + +; Identification: identifiedBy: +F.F.F. Moreira +; Event: year: 2007; month: 11; day: 6; eventRemarks: K. Dias-Silva col.; Record Level: type: PhysicalObject; institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Distribution +Brazil, Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, Argentina, Uruguay. +Distribution in Brazil: MT!, SP, SC, RS. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/41/87/374187F75C27FFFBFF538747FEBAF922.xml b/data/37/41/87/374187F75C27FFFBFF538747FEBAF922.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1bfd0edf190 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/41/87/374187F75C27FFFBFF538747FEBAF922.xml @@ -0,0 +1,556 @@ + + + +Rhizopogon kretzerae sp. nov.: the rare fungal symbiont in the tripartite system with Pterospora andromedea and Pinus strobus + + + +Author + +Lisa C. Grubisha + + + +Author + +Nicholas J. Dowie + + + +Author + +Steven L. Miller + + + +Author + +Christina Hazard + + + +Author + +Steven M. Trowbridge + + + +Author + +Thomas R. Horton + + + +Author + +Matthew R. Klooster + +text + + +Botany + + +2014 + +92 + + +526 +534 + + + +journal article +10.1139/cjb-2013-0309 +64379599-7629-403d-bda9-41b1a6143749 +246791 + + + + + + +Rhizopogon kretzerae + +Grubisha, Dowie, & Mill + +. +sp. nov. + + + + +and +. + + + + +INDEX FUNGORUM REGISTRATION NUMBER +: +IF 550254 + + + + +DIAGNOSIS +: +Known only from ectomycorrhizal symbioses with + +Pinus strobus + +and monotropoid mycorrhizal symbioses with the mycoheterotrophic plant + +Pterospora andromedea + +in eastern North America. + +Rhizopogon kretzerae + +can be distinguished from + +R. salebrosus + +, presently the closest identified species, by two indels found in the ITS1 and 12 fixed nucleotide differences, three in the ITS1 and nine in the ITS2. + + + + +HOLOTYPE +: +DAOM 242738 + + +LOCATION +: +United States of America, Michigan, Ottawa National Forest, 46.64271°N, 89.17873°W. Collection number: Miller 207, Collected: 4 August 2011 by N.J. Dowie and S.L. Miller. DAOM 242738 is a specimen from silica-dried, dead culture isolated from + +Pterospora andromedea + +roots, stored with silica. + + + + +ETYMOLOGY +: +Named in honor of Dr. Annette Kretzer (State Univer- sity of New York, Syracuse, New York, USA), whose pioneering work on the population genetics of + +Rhizopogon vinicolor +A.H. Sm. + +and + +Rhizopogon vesiculosus +A.H. Sm. + +advanced our understanding of + +Rhizopogon + +evolutionary biology and provided inspiration to many mycologists and students. + + + + +DESCRIPTION +: +Macroscopic and microscopic observations were made from a live culture of isolate Miller 207 but not the dried specimen that was deposited as the holotype because these notes were made after the dried holotype specimen was deposited at DAOM. + + +MACROSCOPIC CHARACTERISTICS +: +Mycelial mat whitish at first (circa one week), aerial hyphae developing shades of pale brownish grey, older cultures (circa three weeks) pale reddish grey to gray- ish red, brownish orange, light brown or brown, often with patches of lighter color scattered across the colony (). Under U.V. light, light purple with dark purple patches; reverse brown, uniform, with radiating fans at the margin; mycelial mat floccose when first isolated, becoming low, dense, felty with age and with repeated transfers; margin irregular, whispy, aerial mycelium sparser toward edge, hyphae submerged at edge of colony when younger, submerged area overgrown on surface with fine hyphae in age, darker brown-like reverse appearing as a dark halo sur- rounding mycelial mat, minute knots of hyphae scattered to abundant at margin and throughout colony, concolorous with mycelium or lighter in color; maximum growth rate 3.0–3.4 cm in one month at 25 °C; odor strong, sweet, and pleasant. + + +MICROSCOPIC CHARACTERISTICS +: +Hyphae of interior of mycelial mat mostly 3–7 um, thick-walled, smooth, frequently swollen at sep- tations or forming vesciculose, catenulate cells, 6–33 µm wide, thin-walled, easily collapsing; branching mostly simple, dendritic hyphae common; septae simple; clamps absent. Hyphae of ex- terior of mycelial mat mostly 3–10 µm, cylindrical, branching simple, dendritic hyphae common, few swollen catenulate cells present, moderately thick-walled, heavily encrusted overall or in discreet patches with granular, pale brown pigment in KOH, in Melzer's Reagent pigment darker brown (dextriniod), soluble and floating free from the hyphal wall and appearing large globular or amorphous; septae simple; clamps absent. + + + + +ECOLOGY AND DISTRIBUTION + +: + +Rhizopogon kretzerae + + +appears to be re- stricted to areas with + +Pinus strobus + +and + +Pterospora andromedea + +or + +P. strobus + +alone in Northern Michigan, New York, New Hampshire, and southern Quebec. identified + +R. kretzerae + +from + +P. strobus + +roots within a + +P. andromedea + +rootball from Keweenaw County, Michigan. A soil bioassay study has shown that the frequency of + +R. kretzerae + +propagules in soil increases in + +P. strobus + +areas where + +P. andromedea + +is reproductively active with + +R. kretzerae + +occurring at a frequency from 6% of soil samples from sites with + +P. strobus + +to 14% to 25% (site vs. plot) in soils with both + +P. strobus + +and + +P. andromedea + +(). + + +COMMENTS + +: + +Rhizopogon kretzerae + + +is the first record of a + +Rhizopogon + +subgenus +Amylopogon +species that occurs in eastern North Amer- ica (i.e., east of the Mississippi River in US;;). Presently, there are no known annotated herbarium collections of the basidiocarp. Monotropoid mycorrhizal rootballs of eastern + +P. andromedea + +and + +R. kretzerae + +have diameters reaching a maximum of approximately 1.5 inches and are substantially smaller than rootballs of + +P. andromedea + +and + +R. salebrosus + +in western North America (). Ultrastructure of + +P. andromedea + +monotropoid roots has been described in detail by + + + + + +Fig. 3. + + +Pterospora +andromedea + + + +and + +Rhizopogon + +spp. monotropoid mycorrhizal rootballs. (A) + + +Rhizopogon +kretzerae + + +rootball visible at soil surface. (B) Close up of a much larger + +R. salebrosus + +rootball from western North America (photographs by N.J. Dowie). + + + +. + + + +OTHER SPECIMENS EXAMINED + +: + +Pterospora andromedea + + +monotropoid mycorrhizal roots DAOM 242739, Location: Canada, province of Quebec, 45.4947°N, 76.3786°W; Collection number: Quebec A21, Collected: 26 July 2012 by M.R. Klooster and L.C. Grubisha; DAOM 242740, Location: Canada, province of Quebec, 45.4947°N, 76.3786°W; Collection number: Quebec A22, Collected: 26 July 2012 by M.R. Klooster and L.C. Grubisha; DAOM 242741, Location: Canada, province of Quebec, 47.2900°N, 79.4566°W, Collection number: Quebec D16, Collected 27 July 2012 by M.R. Klooster and L.C. Grubisha; DAOM 242742, Location: Canada, province of Quebec, 47.3166°N, 79.4533°W, Collection number: Quebec E22, Collected: 27 July 2012 by M.R. Klooster and L.C. Grubisha; DAOM 242743, Location: Canada, province of Quebec, 45.4672°N, 75.8069°W, Collection number: Quebec H11, Collected: 27 July 2012 by M.R. Klooster and L.C. Grubisha. All root samples were dried in silica gel. + + + + + +Discussion + + + +In this study, + +Rhizopogon kretzerae +Grubisha, Dowie + +, & Mill., sp. nov. was described. This is also the first report of the distribution of this rare fungus in Quebec from five locations covering approximately 430 km. Since there are no known basidiocarp collections, the species description was based on ITS sequence data, ecological information, and a morphological description of the culture isolated from + +P. andromedea + +roots. The results from phylogenetic analyses presented here and in previous studies (;) are strong evidence that + +R. kretzerae + +is a species according to the phylogenetic species concept. If a basidiocarp is collected at some future time, the present description should be amended. Prior to this study, two GenBank environmental sequences (AF442136, DQ426677) had a>99% identity and both came to be known by some variation of the cumbersome phrase “the unnamed species of + +Rhizopogon + +subgenus +Amylopogon +that associates with + +P. andromedea + +in the east” (;), which can now be referred to as + +R. kretzerae + +. Furthermore, now it is possible to communicate ecological information about + +R. kretzerae + +if this species is found in environmental samples not associated with + +Pterospora + +in future studies of pines in eastern North America. Likewise, identification of + +R. kretzerae + +from soil near + +P. strobus + +may indicate the presence of potential candidate sites for + +Pterospora + +restoration efforts. + + +Nucleotide divergence estimates provided a quantitative measure for comparing how sequences between species differ at the molecular level. In previous fungal studies, these statistics provided additional molecular evidence in support of speciation events in the + +Amanita muscaria + +complex (), + +Tricholoma scalpturatum + +complex (), and in identifying two lineages of cryptic species in + +Tricholoma populinum + +( + + +). In this study, + +R. kretzerae + +and + +R. salebrosus + +are separated by the fewest number of fixed nucleotide differences (12) that support an apparent sister-group relationship in the unrooted phylogeny (). A phylogeny with an outgroup was not shown due to the large number of gaps and ambiguously aligned positions that needed to be removed for analyses, which would have removed too many informative positions within the ingroup. Phylogenetic assessments of species in + +Rhizopogon + +subgenus +Amylopogon +based on multiple nuclear loci are currently underway (N.J. Dowie, unpublished data). + + +The lack of historic collections of basidiocarps in herbaria or collection by contemporary researchers of + +Pterospora + +or + +Rhizopogon + +may stem from a variety of reasons. This species may no longer reproduce sexually in nature due to severely altered environmental conditions (e.g., fire suppression), or alternatively, basidiocarps are produced but (1) at a time when no one has searched for them (e.g., early or late in the fruiting season); (2) are deeper in the soil profile than is typical for finding + +Rhizopogon + +basidiocarps; or (3) at a very low frequency and less likely to be collected. Hypothesis 3 is supported by the low frequency in which + +R. kretzerae + +has been identified in soil bioassays () when compared with similar studies on western North America + +Rhizopogon + +species (;). + + +In this study, two strategies were implemented to avoid naming an already described species. First, 22 ITS holotype and paratype sequences of + +Rhizopogon + +subgenus +Amylopogon +were retrieved from GenBank for phylogenetic comparison to + +R. kretzerae + +(). Second, partial to entire ITS sequences were determined from four + +Rhizopogon + +holotypes collected in Michigan that were associated with + +Pinus + +spp., but subsequently shown to belong to + +Rhizopogon + +subgenera other than subgenus +Amylopogon +. These results support + + +who had synonymized + +R. superiorensis + +with + +R. succossus + +. In the case of + +R. baxteri +, Zeller + +had originally identified the collection Baxter2578 as + +R. rubescens + +(see original herbarium card; + + +). Owing to the high similarity of Baxter2578 with + +R. rubescens + +and + +R. roseolus + +sequences, it is unclear whether + +R. baxteri + +is a unique species; however, this, along with determining the taxonomic status of + +R. gelatinosus + +MICH 3268 and holotypes + +R. gelatinosus + +MICH 12392 and + +R. pinicola + +MICH 12404 will be left for investigation in future studies as it is beyond the scope of the current study. The ITS2 primers introduced here (R370F and R536R) may be useful in future studies of historic + +Rhizopogon + +collections. + + + +Pterospora andromedea + +populations in Quebec were reproductively active in July 2012 despite a widespread drought in southeastern Canada. We found plants at five out of seven sites visited based on 10 historic + +Pterospora + +locations listed on the collecting permit provided by Quebec's provincial government. Four of five sites had more than 10 plants, but only one site had more than 20 plants. Stems from 2011 were present at all sites that had flowering plants in 2012, but were equal or fewer in number to those counted in 2012. However, the total number of stems present in 2012 at these five sites was lower than in previous records (24–270) provided on the collecting permit. The low number to complete absence of plants observed in 2012 could have been the result of: ( +i +) the severe drought, ( +ii +) a simple reflection of the sporadic nature of the flowering pattern in + +Pterospora + +, in which the plant is abundant in some years and completely absent in others, similar to the fruiting pattern of some fungi, or ( +iii +) an indication that the Quebec populations are in serious decline, as has been shown in other eastern populations. Continued monitoring of + +Pterospora + +sites, historic and contemporary, is necessary to gain a better understanding of the ecology and reproductive biology of this species. + + +This work is the first installment of a series of conservation genetics and phylogeographic studies of eastern and western populations of + +Pterospora andromedea + +and + +Rhizopogon + +symbionts. Conservation management plans and scientific studies may now refer to this potentially rare fungal species as + +Rhizopogon kretzerae + +, instead of the formerly used name “the undescribed + +Rhizopogon + +subgenus +Amylopogon +species that associates with + +Pterospora andromedea + +in the east”. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/42/3D/37423D84AEF47C7165D176EBF9B206D4.xml b/data/37/42/3D/37423D84AEF47C7165D176EBF9B206D4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0955ffa5363 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/42/3D/37423D84AEF47C7165D176EBF9B206D4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ + + + +The medicinal plants of Myanmar + + + +Author + +DeFilipps, Robert A. +Deceased + + + +Author + +Krupnick, Gary A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1357-4826 +Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC- 166, Washington, DC, 20013 - 7012, USA +krupnick@si.edu + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2018 + +2018-06-28 + + +102 + + +1 +341 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.102.24380 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.102.24380 +1314-2003-102-1 +AA226A35FFF8FFBC37621A40C2518C67 +1306325 + + + + +Hygrophila phlomoides Nees + + + +Names. + +Myanmar +: +hsay-dan +, +meegyaung-kun-hpat +, +migyaung-kunbat +. +English +: Burma linseed. + + + +Range. +Temperate Asia: China and Tropical Asia: Indian subcontinent. In Myanmar, found in Bago, Taninthayi, and Yangon. + + +Uses. + +Seed +: Used for making medicines to cure sore eyes, for flatulence, and for discoloration and fungal infections of the skin. Crushed and used as a poultice over festering and long-standing sores. + + + +Notes. + +In India the leaf is used for boils and headache ( +Jain and DeFilipps 1991 +). + + +In East and Southeast Asia, primarily the leaves are used for poulticing fresh wounds, sprained limbs, swellings, abscesses, boils, and headache ( +Perry 1980 +). + + + +Reference. + +Agricultural Corporation (1980) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/42/6B/37426B94D71985E7FA67C857801C9002.xml b/data/37/42/6B/37426B94D71985E7FA67C857801C9002.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f3e0e42c627 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/42/6B/37426B94D71985E7FA67C857801C9002.xml @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ + + + +Catalogue of the hymenopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. Part VI. Formicidae. + + + +Author + +Smith, F. + +text + +1858 +British Museum + +London + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/8127/8127.pdf + +book +8127 +C86CFDBF-61D9-48EE-9C2E-325FC0462B10 + + + + +58. +Polyrhachis rugosus +. B.M. + + + +Worker. Length 5 1/2 lines.-Black: the abdomen densely clothed with pale golden silky pubescence. Head elongate and coarsely rugose; eyes very prominent, placed backwards on the sides of the head; the head much narrowed behind the eyes, before the eyes it is slightly widened to the angles of the anterior margin, which is rounded; the mandibles large and triangular, finely denticulate on their inner margin; antennae elongate and slender, the scape with a number of erect, long hairs. Thorax elongate, slender, and coarsely rugose; the prothorax narrowed anteriorly into a kind of neck, the mesothorax narrower than the pro- or metathorax, the latter elevated and furnished with two long, stout spines; legs elongate and having a number of erect, long hairs. Abdomen ovate; the node of the peduncle elongated, incrassate and slightly bent, widest at the base. + + +Hab. Brazil (Ega). (Coll. H. W. Bates.) + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/42/84/374284A7A9A92CF68CE5312ECFB51312.xml b/data/37/42/84/374284A7A9A92CF68CE5312ECFB51312.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..91cf7ea35e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/42/84/374284A7A9A92CF68CE5312ECFB51312.xml @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part H) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +557 +585 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Hieracium gronovii +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 802. 1753 + + +, +nom. cons. + + + +"Habitat in Virginia, Pensylvania." RCN: 5858. + + + +Conserved type (Reveal in +Taxon +41: 149. 1992): +Clayton 447 +(BM- 000051568). + + + + +Current name: + +Hieracium gronovii +L. + +( +Asteraceae +). + + + + +Note: +Reveal (in +Taxon +41: 149. 1992) proposed +Clayton 447 +(BM) as the conserved type because the +lectotype +(954.16, LINN), designated by +D'Arcy +& Tomb (in +Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. +62: 1294. 1975) was identifiable as + +H. venosum +L. The Committee + +for Spermatophyta (in +Taxon +43: 277. 1994) initially voted against the proposal, but later reconsidered the case in the light of changes made to the Code, and subsequently (in +Taxon +45: 674. 1996) voted unanimously for conservation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/0A/37430AE2FBC520ACDE6FE23C66CCEF1E.xml b/data/37/43/0A/37430AE2FBC520ACDE6FE23C66CCEF1E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a6b085cdf37 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/0A/37430AE2FBC520ACDE6FE23C66CCEF1E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Tribe +Talanini Champion, 1887 (1883) + + + + +Dignamptini +J. L. LeConte and G. H. Horn, 1883: 385 [stem: Dignampt-]. Type genus: +Dignamptus +J. L. LeConte, 1878 [syn. of +Talanus +Jacquelin du Val, 1857]. + + +Talanides +Champion, 1887: 321 [stem: Talan-]. Type genus: +Talanus +Jacquelin du Val, 1857. Comment: family-group name conserved over +Dignamptini +J. L. LeConte and G. H. Horn, 1883 (Art. 40.2) (see Bouchard et al. 2005). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/3E/37433E2FED6148A74EC11C9C36D4A835.xml b/data/37/43/3E/37433E2FED6148A74EC11C9C36D4A835.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6e77f97d997 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/3E/37433E2FED6148A74EC11C9C36D4A835.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +Diversity and biogeography of land snails (Mollusca, Gastropoda) in the limestone hills of Perak, Peninsular Malaysia + + + +Author + +Foon, Junn Kitt +Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia & Rimba, 22 - 3 A, Casa Kiara 2, Jalan Kiara 5, 50480 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Clements, Gopalasamy Reuben +Rimba, 22 - 3 A, Casa Kiara 2, Jalan Kiara 5, 50480 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia & Department of Biological Sciences, Sunway University, No. 5 Jalan Universiti, 47500 Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Liew, Thor-Seng +Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia & Rimba, 22 - 3 A, Casa Kiara 2, Jalan Kiara 5, 50480 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia +thorsengliew@gmail.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +2017-07-04 + + +682 + + +1 +94 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.682.12999 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.682.12999 +1313-2970-682-1 +0AE82225C67E4D908BBEC30124E6C312 +FFBCE458FFDBFFC93B2EFFB2F562FFBE +3484859 + + + + +Chloritis breviseta (Pfeiffer, 1862) +Figure 21C + + + +Materials examined. +mykarst-027: BOR/MOL 9091, BOR/MOL 9016. Prk 47 Kanthan: BOR/MOL 9054, BOR/MOL 9137. + + +Distribution. + +In Peninsular Malaysia, known from Kelantan and Perak ( +Maassen 2001 +). Elsewhere, in Thailand ( +Maassen 2001 +). + + + +Remarks. + +Medium-sized shell. Spire almost flat. Peristome reflected, more outwardly elongated than + +Chloritis penangensis + +. Shell flatter than + +C. penangensis + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/60/37436063434415E3A985DE2C1F95824D.xml b/data/37/43/60/37436063434415E3A985DE2C1F95824D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..405b9439395 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/60/37436063434415E3A985DE2C1F95824D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Hypecoum erectum +, +spec. nov. + + + + +3. Hypecoum siliquis erectis teretibus torulosis. +Hort. ups.32. + + +Hypecoum tenuifolium, siliquis erectis teretibus. +Amm. ruth. 58. t.9. + + + + +Habitat in +Dauria +. + + + + + +TETRAGYNIA +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/77/374377D8F4D948F0AA0EB29485886764.xml b/data/37/43/77/374377D8F4D948F0AA0EB29485886764.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..735eaca8706 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/77/374377D8F4D948F0AA0EB29485886764.xml @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ + + + +New distribution records for Canadian Aleocharinae (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae), and new synonymies for Trichiusa + + + +Author + +Klimaszewski, Jan + + + +Author + +Godin, Benoit + + + +Author + +Langor, David + + + +Author + +Bourdon, Caroline + + + +Author + +Lee, Seung-Il + + + +Author + +Horwood, Denise + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +498 + + +51 +91 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.498.9282 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.498.9282 +1313-2970-498-51 +F0007AC67F1E4CA7A47EFDC95F561568 +F0007AC67F1E4CA7A47EFDC95F561568 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Coleoptera Staphylinidae + + + +Acrotona recondita (Erichson) +Figs 1-8 + + + + +Acrotona recondita +LECTOTYPE (male): +Homalota recondita +Erichson; USA: Pennsylv[ania], Zimm[erman] [on green rectangular card]; # 5472; Typus; +recondita +Er.; Lectotypus, male, +Homalota recondita +Erichson, V.I. Gusarov des. (not published); our lectotype designation label as +Homalota recondita +; +Acrotona recondita +(Er.) V.I. Gusarov 2002 (ZMB) studied. PARALECTOTYPES: labelled as the lectotype, our paralectotype designation label (ZMB) 1 male, 2 females, 1 sex undetermined, specimen partially damaged, studied. + + +Arisota apacheella +Casey 1910 +: 135. Synonymized by +Moore and Legner 1975 +: 371. + + +Arisota insueta +Casey 1910 +: 134. Synonymized by +Moore and Legner 1975 +: 371. + + +Arisota pomonensis +Casey 1910 +: 135. Synonymized by +Moore and Legner 1975 +: 371. + + +Arisota speculifer +Casey 1910 +: 135. Synonymized by +Moore and Legner 1975 +: 371. + + +Arisota tetricula +Casey 1910 +: 134. Synonymized by +Moore and Legner 1975 +: 371. + + +Arisota umbrina +Casey 1910 +: 136. Synonymized by +Moore and Legner 1975 +: 371. + + + +Diagnosis. +Body narrowly subparallel (Fig. 1), length 1.7-1.8 mm, dark brown with two large reddish-brown spots on posterior sutural part of elytra and lighter colour tarsi (Fig. 1); head, pronotum and elytra coarsely and sparsely punctate, punctures large; pubescence sparse; integument strongly glossy; pronotum transverse, slightly narrower than elytra, pubescence directed laterad from median line; elytra at suture about as long as pronotum; abdomen subparallel. MALE. Median lobe of aedeagus with oval bulbus and narrowly elongate and rounded tubus in dorsal view (Fig. 3), in lateral view tubus slightly arcuate basally and straight apically (Fig. 2); internal sac structures not pronounced; tergite VIII truncate apically (Fig. 4); sternite VIII slightly emarginated at apex and with broad distance between base of disc and antecostal suture (Fig. 5). FEMALE. Tergite VIII truncate apically (Fig. 7); sternite VIII broadly arcuate apically (Fig. 8); spermatheca with narrowly elongate club-shaped capsule angularly connected to narrow and long stem, together forming L-shaped structure (Fig. 6). + + +Figures 1-8. +Acrotona recondita +(Casey): 1 habitus in dorsal view 2 median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view, and 3 in dorsal view 4 male tergite VIII 5 male sternite VIII 6 spermatheca in lateral view 7 female tergite VIII 8 female sternite VIII; 1, 6-8 based on female from Saskatchewan 2-5 based on male from Pennsylvania. + + + + +Distribution. + + +Distribution of +Acrotona recondita + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
SK
Saskatchewan: 49.9037°, -109.5909°
+Erichson 1839 +Bland 1865 +Casey 1910 +Moore and Legner 1975 +
+ + + +Natural history. +The single female in Saskatchewan was captured in horse manure. + + +Remarks. + +This species was originally described by +Erichson (1839) +as +Homalota recondita +, from Pennsylvania. It clearly does not belong to +Homalota +and was subsequently listed by +Moore and Legner (1975) +as belonging to the subgenus +Dimetrota +of +Atheta +. Gusarov, V.I. identified types of +Homalota recondita +as +Acrotona +. The inclusion of this species in +Acrotona +needs confirmation because it has scarcly visible minute part of pronotal hypomeron visible in lateral view. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA711238FF02B9A9D5D506DA.xml b/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA711238FF02B9A9D5D506DA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..30c10aa89b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA711238FF02B9A9D5D506DA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,288 @@ + + + +A contribution to the knowledge of Themus (Haplothemus) Wittmer from China (Coleoptera: Cantharidae) + + + +Author + +Yang, Yuxia + + + +Author + +Liu, Haoyu + + + +Author + +Yang, Xingke + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-04-10 + + +4407 + + +2 + + +241 +253 + + + +journal article +30311 +10.11646/zootaxa.4407.2.5 +177c225c-e7db-4fc0-a099-f88eead488de +1175-5326 +1216378 +6B58A9F4-1A92-4E3A-92E3-1B80388AE534 + + + + + + + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +mishmiensis +Wittmer, 1973 + +stat. nov. + + + + +Figs 4 +, 16‒18 + + + + + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +elongatior mishmiensis +Wittmer, 1973: 191 + +, 210, figs 25, 26. + + + + + +Type +material examined. + +Paratype +: +1♂ +( +NHMB +): [p] “ +Assam +: \ Mishmi Hills, \ +10000ft +12-vi-1923 +, \ Percy Sladen Expn. \ B. M. 1929-531,”, [h] “28°10ʹN 96°37ʹE”, [p] “ +PARATYPUS +”, “ +Themus +\ +elongatior +ssp. \ +mishmiensis +\ Wittm. \ det. W. Wittmer”, [p] “Naturhist. \ Museum Basel \ coll. W. Wittmer”, [p] “ +CANTHARIDAE +\ +CANTH +00001206”. + + + + +Other +material examined. + +CHINA +, +Xizang +: one male ( +MHBU +), Zayü, + +17.VII.2005 + +, leg. +A.M. Shi + +; one male (MHBU), Mêdog, Lage, +3300m +, +8.VIII.2003 +, leg. G.D. Ren. + + + + +Distribution. +China +(new record: +Xizang +); +India +. + + + + +Redescription. +Male ( +Fig. 4 +). Body orange brown, head darkened at anterior part of dorsum, mandibles darkened at apices, pronotum slightly darkened at both sides of disc, legs slightly darkened at tarsi, abdominal ventrites except the terminal one each side with a small round black marking. Body densely covered with decumbent orange brown pubescence, except those black on elytra and a few long hairs along anterior margin of clypeus. + +Head rounded, sparsely and finely punctate, surface lustrous; eyes moderately protruding, head width across eyes slightly wider than anterior margin of pronotum; terminal maxillary palpomeres nearly long-triangular, widest at basal two-fifths length, with outer margins slightly arcuate, inner apical margins slightly sharp and apices rounded; antennae slightly thickened, almost extending to elytral mid-length, antennomeres II about three times as long as wide, III distinctly shorter than II, IV about 1.5 times as long as III, V longest, V‒X gradually shortened and narrowed one by one, XI slightly shorter than X and pointed at apices, IV‒X each with a small round or oblong impression at apical part or near middle of outer margin. +Pronotum subquadrate, about 1.4 times as wide as long, anterior margin arcuate, lateral margins slightly diverging posteriorly, posterior margin nearly straight and narrowly bordered, anterior angles nearly rectangular, posterior angles rounded, disc convex at postero-lateral parts, sparsely and finely punctate like that on head, surface matt. +Elytra about 6.0 times longer than pronotum, 3.3 times as long as humeral width, with lateral margins nearly parallel, disc rugulose-lacunose and coarsely punctate, surface matt. +Aedeagus (Figs 16‒18): ventral process of each paramere moderately bent inwards in ventral view, abruptly narrowed at base, distinctly protuberant at basal part of outer margin, longitudinally depressed along the whole length of ventral side, rounded and slightly turned ventrally at apex; conjoint dorsal plate of parameres slightly shorter than ventral processes, narrowly emarginated in middle of apical margin, lateral angles widely rounded and around with long hairs; laterophyses distinctly shorter than conjoint dorsal plate, situated on dorsal side of median lobe, conjoint and depressed, widely and triangularly emarginated in middle of apical part, with latero-apical part acute at apex and slightly bent dorsally. + +FIGURES 16–24. +Aedeagus (16, 19, 22. ventral vieW; 17, 20, 23. dorsal vieW; 18, 21, 24. lateral vieW): 16‒18. + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +mishmiensis +Wittmer, 1973 + +; 19‒21. +T +. ( +H +.). + +weishanensis +Kopetz, 2016 + +; 22‒24. + +T +. ( +H +.) +longideverticulum + + +sp. nov. + +Scale bars: 1.0 mm. + + + + +FIGURES 25–29. +Internal reproductive organ of female genitalia, lateral vieW: 25. + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +quadratus +Wittmer, 1983 + +; 26. + +T +. ( +H +.) +quadratiformis + + +sp. nov. + +; 27. + +T +. ( +H +.) +elongatior +Pic, 1955 + +; 28. + +T +. ( +H +.) +weishanensis +Kopetz, 2016 + +; 29. + +T +. ( +H +.) +longideverticulum + + +sp. nov. + +Scale bars: 1.0 mm. (ag: accessory gland; di: diverticulum; sp: spermatheca; ov: median oviduct; va: vagina; sr: sclerotized ring) + + + + +Remarks. +Except the appearance, the structure of the adeagus of + +T. +( +H. +) +mishmiensis + +is obviously different from that of + +T. +( +H. +) +elongatior + +. Thus, we suggest place + +T. +( +H. +) +mishmiensis + +in the specific status. It is reported from +China +for the first time. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA731237FF02B939D10D0442.xml b/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA731237FF02B939D10D0442.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..51652c0610a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA731237FF02B939D10D0442.xml @@ -0,0 +1,313 @@ + + + +A contribution to the knowledge of Themus (Haplothemus) Wittmer from China (Coleoptera: Cantharidae) + + + +Author + +Yang, Yuxia + + + +Author + +Liu, Haoyu + + + +Author + +Yang, Xingke + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-04-10 + + +4407 + + +2 + + +241 +253 + + + +journal article +30311 +10.11646/zootaxa.4407.2.5 +177c225c-e7db-4fc0-a099-f88eead488de +1175-5326 +1216378 +6B58A9F4-1A92-4E3A-92E3-1B80388AE534 + + + + + + + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +elongatior +Pic, 1955 + + + + + +Figs 3 +, +13‒15 +, +27 +, +32 + + + + + + +Themus elongatior + +Pic, 1955 +: 16 + + +. + + + + + +Themus +(s.str.) +elongatior +: Wittmer, 1973: 191 + +, 210, figs 23, 24; + +Okushima, 1999 +: 57 + +, figs 5, 30. + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +elongatior +: Švihla, 2008: 185 + +. + + + + + + +Type +material examined. + +Holotype +: +1♂ +( +MNHN +), [p] “ +BRITISH INDIA +\ +SKKIM +\ Lachen-Lachung \ +VIII.1933 +”, [h] “ +Themus +\ +elongatior +\ +n. sp +.”, [p] “ +Themus +\ +elongatior +\ Pic \ det. W. Wittmer”, [p] “ +HOLOTYPUS +”. + + + + +Other +material examined. + +CHINA +, +Xizang +: one male, two females ( +MHBU +), +Tingri +, +Rongxia +, + +3492 m + +, 28°03.673ʹN, 86°20.919ʹE, + +27.VII.2014 + +, leg. +G.D. Ren +, X.L. +Bai +& J + +. + +S. Shan +; one female ( +MHBU +), +Tingri +, +Chentang +power station, + +3234 m + +, 27°55.069ʹN, 87°28.171ʹE, + +3.VIII.2014 + +, leg. +G.D. Ren +, X.L. +Bai +& J.S. +Shan + +; + +one male ( +IZAS +), “ +Tibet +, +Mêdog +, +Baibung, E +. Doxong Pass Lage hotel, +pitfall trap +, +29.46751°N +, +95.00232°E +, + +3210 m + +, 2006.8.8, +Liang H.B. +”. + + + + + +Distribution. +China +( +Xizang +); +India +, +Nepal +. + + + + +Redescription. +Male ( +Fig. 3 +). Body black, mouthparts orange brown, darkened at mandibular apices, legs orange brown at coxae, trochanters and basal parts of femora, ventral surface orange brown, abdominal ventrites except the terminal one each side with a small round black marking. Body densely covered with decumbent black pubescence on dorsal surface but brown on ventral surface, mixed with a few long hairs along anterior margin of clypeus. + +Head rounded, sparsely and finely punctate, surface lustrous; eyes moderately protruding, head width across eyes slightly wider than anterior margin of pronotum; terminal maxillary palpomeres nearly long-triangular, widest at basal two-fifths length, with outer margins slightly arcuate, inner apical margins slightly sharp and apices acute; antennae slightly thickened, almost extending to elytral mid-length, antennomeres II about four times as long as wide, III distinctly shorter than II, IV about twice as long as III, V longest, V‒X gradually shortened and narrowed one by one, XI slightly shorter than X and pointed at apices, IV‒VIII each with a short longitudinal or oblong impression at apical part of outer margin. +Pronotum subquadrate, about 1.5 times as wide as long, anterior and lateral margins arcuate, posterior margin nearly straight and narrowly bordered, anterior and posterior angles widely rounded, disc convex at postero-lateral parts, sparsely and finely punctate like that on head, surface matt. +Elytra about 6.0 times longer than pronotum, 3.3 times as long as humeral width, with lateral margins nearly parallel, disc rugulose-lacunose and coarsely punctate, surface matt. + +Aedeagus ( +Figs 13‒15 +): ventral process of each paramere moderately bent inwards in ventral view, abruptly narrowed at base, distinctly protuberant at basal part of outer margin, longitudinally depressed along the whole length of ventral side, rounded and slightly turned ventrally at apex; conjoint dorsal plate of parameres distinctly shorter than ventral processes, widely and roundly emarginated in middle of apical margin, lateral angles rectangular and around with long hairs; laterophyses slightly shorter than conjoint dorsal plate, situated on dorsal side of median lobe, conjoint and depressed, widely and triangularly emarginated in middle of apical part, with latero-apical part acute at apex and slightly bent dorsally. + +Female. Similar to male, but antennae slightly shorter and thinner, antennomeres IV‒VIII without any impression. + + +FIGURES 7–15. +Aedeagus (7, 10, 13. ventral vieW; 8, 11, 14. dorsal vieW; 9, 12, 15. lateral vieW): 7‒9. + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +quadratus +Wittmer, 1983 + +; 10‒12. + +T +. ( +H +.) +quadratiformis + + +sp. nov. + +; 13‒15. + +T +. ( +H +.) +elongatior +Pic, 1955 + +. Scale bars: 1.0 mm. + + + +Abdominal sternite VIII ( +Fig. 32 +) triangularly emarginated in middle and rectangularly emarginated on both sides of posterior margin, the lateral emargination nearly as deep as and slightly wider than the middle one, the portion between middle and lateral emarginations rounded at apex. + + +Internal reproductive organ of genitalia ( +Fig. 27 +): vagina stout, with diverticulum and spermatheca situated at apical one-third part, median oviduct at basal one-third part of ventral side; diverticulum slightly long tube-shaped, distinctly shorter than vagina, evenly thick in the whole length, about twice as long as wide, rounded at apex; spermatheca slightly long sac-shaped, distinctly expanded apically and rounded at apex, which is slightly longer than diverticulum, and provided with a long and thin accessory gland at basal one-third part; diverticulum and spermatheca surrounded with a strongly sclerotized ring at base, which is confluent in middle and extending to median oviduct on ventral side, the opening of spermatheca arising from middle of the sclerotized ring on dorsal side. + + + + +Remarks. +The abdominal sternite VIII of female was illustrated by +Okushima (1999) +, but it seems different from the photo provided in the present study probably because of different preparation way of the material. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA741235FF02BA51D5ED07F2.xml b/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA741235FF02BA51D5ED07F2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..482106bf6ac --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA741235FF02BA51D5ED07F2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@ + + + +A contribution to the knowledge of Themus (Haplothemus) Wittmer from China (Coleoptera: Cantharidae) + + + +Author + +Yang, Yuxia + + + +Author + +Liu, Haoyu + + + +Author + +Yang, Xingke + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-04-10 + + +4407 + + +2 + + +241 +253 + + + +journal article +30311 +10.11646/zootaxa.4407.2.5 +177c225c-e7db-4fc0-a099-f88eead488de +1175-5326 +1216378 +6B58A9F4-1A92-4E3A-92E3-1B80388AE534 + + + + + + + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +quadratiformis +Y. Yang et X. Yang + +, +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 2 +, +10‒12 +, +26 +, +31 + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +male ( +IZAS +), +CHINA +, +Shaanxi +, +Taibaishan +, +Luotuoshu +, + +2100m + +, + +6.VIII.1983 + +, collector unknown + +. + +Paratypes +: +CHINA +, +Shaanxi +: one male, one female ( +IZAS +), same data as the +holotype +; one female ( +MHBU +), +Taibaishan +, +Luotuoshu +, + +2100m + +, + +15.V.1983 + +, collector unknown; five males (one male in +MHBU +, one male in +NAFU +and the rest in +IZAS +), Taibaishan, + +26.VII.1956 + +, collector unknown; one female ( +NAFU +), Taibaishan, Minghuangsi, + +3.VIII.1956 + +, collector unknown. + + + + + +Distribution. +China +( +Shaanxi +). + + + + +Description. +Male ( +Fig. 2 +). Head dark brown, black in middle of clypeus and both sides of vertex on dorsum, mouthparts dark brown, darkened at apices of mandibles, antennae dark brown, more or less darkened dorsally, prothorax dark brown, pronotum with two large irregular black markings on disc, the markings more or less conjoint together in middle, never extending to any margin, scutellum dark brown, elytra black, legs dark brown, slightly darkened at apical parts of femora and tibiae and tarsi, ventral surface dark brown. Body densely covered with decumbent brown pubescence, mixed with slightly long, semi-erected pubescence on elytra and a few long hairs along anterior margin of clypeus. + +Head rounded, sparsely and finely punctate, surface lustrous; eyes moderately protruding, head width across eyes slightly wider than anterior margin of pronotum; terminal maxillary palpomeres nearly long-triangular, widest at basal two-fifths length, with outer margins slightly arcuate, inner apical margins slightly sharp and apices acute; antennae slightly thickened, almost extending to basal two-thirds length of elytra, antennomeres II about twice as long as wide, III slightly shorter than II, IV about 1.5 times as long as III, V longest, V‒X gradually shortened and narrowed one by one, XI slightly shorter than X and pointed at apices, IV‒VIII each with a small round or oblong impression near middle of outer margin. +Pronotum subquadrate, about 1.2 times as wide as long, anterior margin arcuate, lateral margins nearly parallel, posterior margin nearly straight and narrowly bordered, anterior angles nearly rectangular, posterior angles rounded, disc convex at postero-lateral parts, sparsely and finely punctate like that on head, surface matt. +Elytra about 5.5 times longer than pronotum, 3.0 times as long as humeral width, with lateral margins nearly parallel, disc rugulose-lacunose and coarsely punctate, surface matt. + +Aedeagus ( +Figs 10‒12 +): ventral process of each paramere narrow, nearly straight and pointed at apex; conjoint dorsal plate of parameres slightly shorter than ventral processes, with lateral margins slightly converging apically, widely and triangularly emarginated in middle of apical margin, latero-apical angles subrectangular; laterophyses compressed and nearly as long as conjoint dorsal plate, separated on both sides of median lobe and nearly parallel to each other, acute and slightly hooked at apices, which pointed dorsally. + +Female. Similar to male, antennae thinner and shorter, roughly extending to basal one-half length of elytra, IV‒VIII without impressions; pronotum about 1.2 times as wide as long; elytra about 3.0 times longer than humeral width. + +Abdominal sternite VIII ( +Fig. 31 +) triangularly emarginated in middle and on both sides of posterior margin, the lateral emargination distinctly wider and slightly deeper than the middle one, the portion between the middle and lateral emarginations truncated at apex. + + +Internal genitalia ( +Fig. 26 +): vagina stout, with diverticulum and spermatheca situated at apex, median oviduct at basal one-third part of ventral side; diverticulum moderately long and thick sac-shaped, slightly shorter than vagina, distinctly expanded at apical half part, about twice as long as maximal width, rounded at apex; spermatheca short sac-shaped, distinctly shorter than diverticulum, moderately expanded apically and rounded at apex, and provided with a moderately long and thin accessory gland at base; diverticulum and spermatheca surrounded with a strongly sclerotized ring at base, which is confluent in middle and extending to median oviduct on ventral side, the opening of spermatheca arising from middle of the sclerotized ring on dorsal side. + +Body length (both sexes): 15.0‒17.0 mm; width 3.2‒4.0 mm. + + + +Diagnosis. +This species is similar to + +T. +( +H. +) +quadratus + +, but can be distinguished from the latter in the following characters: aedeagus: laterophyses compressed and nearly parallel to each other, with apices pointed dorsally (while depressed and diverging from each other, with apices pointed towards lateroapical angles of conjoint dorsal plate in + +T. +( +H. +) +quadratus + +); abdominal sternite VIII of female triangularly emarginated on both sides of posterior margin, the portion between the middle and lateral emarginations truncated at apex (while in + +T. +( +H. +) +quadratus + +, bisinuately emarginate on both sides of posterior margin, the portion between the middle and posterior lateral emarginations acute at apex). + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from the Latin suffix - +formis +(-like), referring to its similarity to + +T +. ( +H +.) +quadratus +Wittmer. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA761232FF02BA73D7AF06DA.xml b/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA761232FF02BA73D7AF06DA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5b54b274e30 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA761232FF02BA73D7AF06DA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,298 @@ + + + +A contribution to the knowledge of Themus (Haplothemus) Wittmer from China (Coleoptera: Cantharidae) + + + +Author + +Yang, Yuxia + + + +Author + +Liu, Haoyu + + + +Author + +Yang, Xingke + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-04-10 + + +4407 + + +2 + + +241 +253 + + + +journal article +30311 +10.11646/zootaxa.4407.2.5 +177c225c-e7db-4fc0-a099-f88eead488de +1175-5326 +1216378 +6B58A9F4-1A92-4E3A-92E3-1B80388AE534 + + + + + + + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +quadratus +Wittmer, 1983 + + + + + +Figs 1 +, +7‒9 +, +25 +, +30 + + + + + +Themus +(s.str.) +quadratus +Wittmer, 1983: 224 + +, fig. 112. + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +quadratus +: Švihla, 2008: 185 + +. + + + + + + +Type +material examined. + +Holotype +: one female ( +IZAS +): [p] “洗象池 \ 1800-2000公尺 \ 采集者: 朱复兴”, [p] “四 川: 峨 眉山 \ 1957. + +VIII.28 + +\ 中 国科学院 ”, [p] “ +HOLOTYPUS +”, [p] “IOZ (E) 217899”. [one female, +China +, +Sichuan +, +Emei Shan +, +Xixiangchi +, + +1800‒2000 m + +, + +28.VIII.1957 + +, leg. +F.X. Zhu +] + +. + + + + +Other +material examined. + +CHINA +, +Gansu +: three males, three females ( +MHBU +): +Wenxian +, +Huangtuling +, + +2350m + +, + +8.VII.2003 + +, leg. +Y.B. Ba +& Y. +Yu. + + + + + +Distribution +. +China +( +Sichuan +, +Gansu +). + + + + +Redescription. +Male ( +Fig. 1 +). Head dark brown, black in middle of clypeus and both sides of vertex on dorsum, mouthparts dark brown, darkened at apices of mandibles, antennae black, prothorax dark brown, pronotum with two large irregular black markings on disc, markings more or less conjoint together in middle, sometimes extending to anterior margin but never to posterior or lateral margins, scutellum dark brown, elytra black, legs dark brown, slightly darkened at apical parts of femora and tibiae and tarsi, ventral surface dark brown, black at both sides of each abdominal ventrite except the terminal one, sometimes more or less darkened at meso- and metasterna. Body densely covered with decumbent brown pubescence, mixed with slightly long, semi-erected pubescence on elytra and few long hairs along anterior margin of clypeus. + +Head rounded, sparsely and finely punctate, surface lustrous; eyes moderately protruding, head width across eyes slightly wider than anterior margin of pronotum; terminal maxillary palpomeres nearly long-triangular, widest at basal two-fifths length, with outer margins slightly arcuate, inner apical margins slightly sharp and apices acute; antennae slightly thickened, almost extending to basal two-thirds length of elytra, antennomeres II about twice as long as wide, III slightly shorter than II, IV about 1.5 times as long as III, V longest, V‒X gradually shortened and narrowed one by one, XI slightly shorter than X and pointed at apices, IV‒VIII each with a small round or oblong impression near middle of outer margin. +Pronotum subquadrate, about 1.2 times as wide as long, anterior margin arcuate, lateral margins nearly parallel, posterior margin nearly straight and narrowly bordered, anterior angles nearly rectangular, posterior angles rounded, disc convex at postero-lateral parts, sparsely and finely punctate like that on head, surface matt. +Elytra about 5.5 times longer than pronotum, 3.0 times as long as humeral width, with lateral margins nearly parallel, disc rugulose-lacunose and coarsely punctate, surface matt. + +Aedeagus ( +Figs 7‒9 +): ventral process of each paramere narrow, nearly straight and nearly pointed at apex; conjoint dorsal plate of parameres slightly shorter than ventral processes, with lateral margins nearly parallel, widely and triangularly emarginated in middle and slightly sinuate on both sides of apical margin, latero-apical angles slightly protuberant and sub-rounded; laterophyses depressed and slightly shorter than conjoint dorsal plate, separated on both sides of median lobe and distinctly diverging from each other, acute and slightly hooked at apices, which pointed towards latero-apical angles of conjoint dorsal plate. + +Female. Similar to male, but antennae slightly thinner and shorter, nearly extending to elytral mid-length, IV‒VIII without impressions; pronotum slightly wider, about 1.3 times as wide as long; elytra with lateral margins slightly diverging posteriorly. + +Abdominal sternite VIII ( +Fig. 30 +) triangularly emarginated in middle and bi-sinuately emarginate on both sides of posterior margin, the lateral emarginations both slightly shallower than the middle one, the anterior lateral emargination slightly wider than the posterior one, the portion between the two lateral emarginations nearly rectangular at apex, and that between the middle and posterior lateral emarginations acute at apex. + + +Internal genitalia ( +Fig. 25 +): vagina stout, with diverticulum and spermatheca situated at apex, median oviduct at basal one-third part of ventral side; diverticulum moderately long and thick sac-shaped, slightly shorter than vagina, distinctly expanded at apical half part, about twice as long as maximal width, rounded at apex; spermatheca short sac-shaped, distinctly shorter than diverticulum, distinctly expanded apically and rounded at apex, and provided with a moderately long and thin accessory gland at base; diverticulum and spermatheca surrounded with a strongly sclerotized ring at base, which is confluent in middle and extending to median oviduct on ventral side, the opening of spermatheca arising from middle of the sclerotized ring on dorsal side. + + +Body length (both sexes): 17.0‒18.0 mm; width: +3.5‒4.5 mm +. + + + + +FIGURES 1–6. +Male habitus, dorsal vieW: 1. + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +quadratus +Wittmer, 1983 + +; 2. + +T +. ( +H +.) +quadratiformis + + +sp. nov. + +; 3. + +T +. ( +H +.) +elongatior +Pic, 1955 + +; 4. + +T +. ( +H +.) +mishmiensis +Wittmer, 1973 + +; 5. + +weishanensis +Kopetz, 2016 + +; 6. + +T +. ( +H +.) +longideverticulum + + +sp. nov. + +Scale bars: 5.0 mm. + + + + +Remarks. +The male of + +T +. ( +H +.) +quadratus +Wittmer, 1983 + +, which was described on a single female specimen in the original manuscript, is discovered and described here for the first time. At the same time, a related species is recognized and described under the name of + +T +. ( +H +.) +quadratiformis + + +sp. nov. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA7E1238FF02BA51D0B903B4.xml b/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA7E1238FF02BA51D0B903B4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d72e011c676 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA7E1238FF02BA51D0B903B4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + + +A contribution to the knowledge of Themus (Haplothemus) Wittmer from China (Coleoptera: Cantharidae) + + + +Author + +Yang, Yuxia + + + +Author + +Liu, Haoyu + + + +Author + +Yang, Xingke + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-04-10 + + +4407 + + +2 + + +241 +253 + + + +journal article +30311 +10.11646/zootaxa.4407.2.5 +177c225c-e7db-4fc0-a099-f88eead488de +1175-5326 +1216378 +6B58A9F4-1A92-4E3A-92E3-1B80388AE534 + + + + + + + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +weishanensis +Kopetz, 2016 + + + + + +Figs 5 +, 19‒21, 28, 33 + + + + + + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +weishanensis + +Kopetz, 2016 +: 253 + + +, +Figs 12 +, 35. + + + + + + + +Other +material examined. + +China +, +Yunnan +: one male, one female ( +IZAS +) + +: + +Yunnan +, +Lijiang +, +Lameirong +, + +2300m + +, + +10.VIII.1984 + +, leg. +S.Y. Wang + +; + +one female ( +IZAS +), same locality and date, leg. +R.Q. Wang. + + + + + +Distribution. +China +( +Yunnan +). + + +Supplementary description. +Male ( +Fig. 5 +). Aedeagus (Figs 19‒21): ventral process of each paramere evenly wide but narrowed apically at apical one-third portion, acute and slightly hooked at apex, longitudinally depressed along the whole length, moderately bent inwards in ventral view; conjoint dorsal plate of parameres distinctly shorter than ventral processes, with lateral margins abruptly converging apically, apical margin moderately widely and sub-triangularly emarginated in middle, latero-apical angles figure-like in dorsal view; laterophyses compressed and slightly longer than conjoint dorsal plate, separated on both sides of median lobe and nearly parallel to each other, acute and slightly hooked at apices, which pointed dorsally. + +Female. Similar to male, but eyes less protruding, antennae slightly shorter, almost extending to basal twofifths length of elytra, antennomeres III slightly shorter than II, pronotum with lateral margins nearly parallel, slightly convex on postero-lateral parts of disc. + +Abdominal sternite VIII ( +Fig. 33 +) narrowly emarginated in middle of posterior margin, which is nearly truncated at apex of lateral portion beside middle emargination. + + +Internal reproductive organ of genitalia ( +Fig. 28 +): vagina stout, with diverticulum and spermatheca situated at apex, median oviduct at basal one-third part of ventral side; diverticulum slightly long tube-shaped, distinctly shorter than vagina, evenly thick in the whole length, about 4.0 times as long as wide, rounded at apex; spermatheca slightly long sac-shaped, slightly expanded apically and rounded at apex, which is slightly longer than diverticulum, and provided with a moderately long and thin accessory gland at base; diverticulum and spermatheca surrounded with a strongly sclerotized ring at base, which is confluent in middle and extending to median oviduct on ventral side, the opening of spermatheca arising from middle of the sclerotized ring on dorsal side. + +Body length (both sexes): 17.0‒20.0 mm; width: 4.0‒5.0 mm. + + + +Remarks. +The female of + +T. +( +H. +) +weishanensis +Kopetz, 2016 + +is discovered for the first time and it makes us to provide some supplementary information for this species. Besides, the aedeagus was provided with the photo of dorsal side by +Kopetz (2016) +, here it is illustrated and described in ventral, dorsal and lateral views. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA7E123AFF02BEF4D702002A.xml b/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA7E123AFF02BEF4D702002A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ec8bb6cbf59 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/87/374387C2EA7E123AFF02BEF4D702002A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@ + + + +A contribution to the knowledge of Themus (Haplothemus) Wittmer from China (Coleoptera: Cantharidae) + + + +Author + +Yang, Yuxia + + + +Author + +Liu, Haoyu + + + +Author + +Yang, Xingke + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-04-10 + + +4407 + + +2 + + +241 +253 + + + +journal article +30311 +10.11646/zootaxa.4407.2.5 +177c225c-e7db-4fc0-a099-f88eead488de +1175-5326 +1216378 +6B58A9F4-1A92-4E3A-92E3-1B80388AE534 + + + + + + + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +longideverticulum +Y. Yang et X. Yang + +, +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 6 +, 22‒24, 29, 34 + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +, male ( +IZAS +): +CHINA +, +Yunnan +, +Nujiang +, +Gongshan +, +Dulong +, +Maku +vill., +27.4112°N +98.1630°E +, + +1228m + +, + +24.IV.2015 + +, leg. M.Y. Lin. +Paratypes +: +3 males +, +2 females +( +IZAS +): same data as the +holotype +. +Distribution. +China ( +Yunnan +) + +. + + + + +Description. +Male ( +Fig. 6 +). Head dark blue, with weak metallic shine, dark brown in center of dorsum and two sides of clypeus, mouthparts light brown, darkened at labial and maxillary palpomeres and apices of mandibles, antennae black, prothorax light yellow, pronotum with a slightly large semi-round and a small round black markings on each side of disc and near middle line, the former nearly in center and the latter behind the former and before posterior margin, scutellum dark blue, with weak metallic shine, elytra dark brown, each with a dark green longitudinal bands in middle, which with weak metallic shine and extending from humeri almost to apex, legs dark blue, with weak metallic shine, dark brown at ventral sides of pro- and mesocoxae, the whole metacoxae, all trochanters and ventral sides of basal parts of tibiae, meso- and metasterna dark blue, with weak metallic shine, abdomen orange, each side with an irregular dark blue marking on abdominal ventrites except the terminal two, the markings with weak metallic shine. Body densely covered with decumbent brown pubescence, mixed with slightly long, semi-erected pubescence on elytra and a few long hairs along anterior margin of clypeus. + + + +FIGURES 30–34. +Abdominal sternite VIII of female, ventral vieW: 30. + +Themus +( +Haplothemus +) +quadratus +Wittmer, 1983 + +; 31. + +T +. ( +H +.) +quadratiformis + + +sp. nov. + +; 32. + +T +. ( +H +.) +elongatior +Pic, 1955 + +; 33. + +T +. ( +H +.) +weishanensis +Kopetz, 2016 + +; 34. + +T +. ( +H +.) +longideverticulum + + +sp. nov. + +Scale bars: 1.0 mm. + + +Head rounded, densely and finely punctate, surface lustrous; eyes distinctly protruding, head width across eyes slightly wider than anterior margin of pronotum; terminal maxillary palpomeres nearly long-triangular, widest at basal two-fifths length, with outer margins slightly arcuate, inner apical margins slightly sharp and apices acute; antennae slightly thickened, almost extending to basal three-fifths length of elytra, antennomeres II about 3.0 times as long as wide, III slightly shorter than II, IV about one-third longer than III, V longest, V‒X gradually shortened and narrowed one by one, XI slightly longer than X and pointed at apices, IV‒IX each with a small round to narrow short longitudinal impression near middle of outer margin. +Pronotum subquadrate, about 1.1 times as wide as long, anterior margin arcuate, lateral margins nearly parallel, posterior margin nearly straight and narrowly bordered, anterior and posterior angles nearly rectangular, disc moderately convex at postero-lateral parts, slightly sparsely and finely punctate, surface lustrous. +Elytra about 5.0 times longer than pronotum, 3.2 times as long as humeral width, with lateral margins nearly parallel, disc rugulose-lacunose and coarsely punctate, surface matt. +Aedeagus (Figs 22‒24): ventral process of each paramere slender and gradually narrowed apically, rounded at apex, nearly straight in ventral view; conjoint dorsal plate of parameres slightly shorter than ventral processes, with lateral margins slightly converging apically, apical margin widely and roundly emarginated in middle, latero-apical angles sub-rounded, each side with a transverse ridge near latero-apical angles of inner surface and; laterophyses compressed, separated on both sides of median lobe and slightly diverging from each other, acute and slightly hooked at apices, which pointed towards the lateroapical angles of conjoint dorsal plate. +Female. Similar to male, but eyes moderately protruding; antennae slightly thinner and shorter, almost extending to basal two-fifths length of elytra, antennomeres IV‒IX without impressions; pronotum about 1.2 times as wide as long; elytra about 3.1 times longer than humeral width. + +Abdominal sternite VIII ( +Fig. 34 +) triangularly emarginated in middle and roundly emarginated on both sides of posterior margin, the middle emargination distinctly deeper and nearly as wide as the lateral one, the portion between middle and lateral emarginations nearly rectangular at apex. + + +Internal genitalia ( +Fig. 29 +): vagina stout, with diverticulum and spermatheca situated at apex, median oviduct at basal one-third part of ventral side; diverticulum very long and thick sac-shaped, about 2.5 times as long as vagina, moderately expanded apically, about 4.0 times as long as maximal width, rounded at apex; spermatheca short sac-shaped, about one-third length of diverticulum, slightly expanded apically and rounded at apex, and provided with a moderately long and thin accessory gland at basal one-third part; diverticulum and spermatheca surrounded with a strongly sclerotized ring at base, which is confluent in middle and extending to median oviduct on ventral side, the opening of spermatheca arising from middle of the sclerotized ring on dorsal side. + + +Body length (both sexes): 19.0‒20.0 mm; width: 4.0‒ +4.5 mm +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +This species is similar to + +T. +( +H. +) +cacharensis +Champion, +1926 + +in the coloration, but differs in the aedeagus: laterophyses flattened and wide, adhere to middle of dorsal side of median lobe, conjoint dorsal plate of parameres smooth on inner surface, while in + +T +. ( +H +.) +cacharensis + +, laterophyses slender, separated on both sides of median lobe, conjoint dorsal plate of parameres each side with a narrow transverse ridge near lateroapical angle on inner surface (see Wittmer 1973: figs 47, 48); abdominal sternite VIII of female roundly emarginated on both sides of posterior margin, the portion between the middle and lateral emarginations nearly rectangular at apex, while in + +T +. ( +H +.) +cacharensis + +, bisinuately emarginated on both sides of posterior margin, the portion between the middle and lateral emarginations acute at apex (see Yang +et al +. 2012: fig. 5). + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name is derived from the Latin +longus +(long) and +deverticulum +(diverticulum), referring to its extremely long diverticum of female genitalia. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/9A/37439A20CB00FF16FC47FE35FAE3F9AC.xml b/data/37/43/9A/37439A20CB00FF16FC47FE35FAE3F9AC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0314f306b29 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/9A/37439A20CB00FF16FC47FE35FAE3F9AC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@ + + + +Early Ordovician Conodonts from Far Western New South Wales, Australia + + + +Author + +Zhen, Yong Yi + + + +Author + +Percival, Ian G. + + + +Author + +Webby, Barry D. + +text + + +Records of the Australian Museum + + +2003 + +2003-08-13 + + +55 + + +2 + + +169 +220 + + + + +https://journals.australian.museum/zhen-et-al-2003-rec-aust-mus-552-169220/ + +journal article +10.3853/j.0067-1975.55.2003.1383 +2201-4349 +10092797 + + + + + + + +Scolopodus quadratus +Pander, 1856 + + + + + + + +Fig. 27A–O + + + + + + + +Scolopodus quadratus +Pander, 1856: 26 + + +, pl. 2, fig. 6a–d, pl.A, fig. 5d. + + + + + + +Scolopodus costatus +Pander, 1856: 26 + + +, pl. 2, fig. 7a–d, pl.A, fig. 5e. + + + + + + +Scolopodus striatus +Pander, 1856: 26 + + +, pl. 2, fig. 8a–d, pl. A, fig. +5f. + + + + + + +Scolopodus rex +Lindström, 1955: 595 + + +, 596, pl. 3, fig. 32. + + + + + + +Scolopodus rex +var. +paltodiformis +Lindström, 1955: 596 + + +, pl. 3, figs. 33, 34. + + + + + +Scolopodus quadratus + +.– + +Fåhraeus, 1982: 21 + +, pl. 2, figs. 1–14, pl. 3, figs. 1–8, 15. + + + + +Scolopodus rex + +.– + +Seo +et al +., 1994 + +, fig. 10.10–10.12. + + + + +Scolopodus rex + +.–Albanesi, +in + + +Albanesi +et al +., 1998: 133 + + +, pl. 12, figs. 14–17 ( +cum syn +.). + + + + +Scolopodus quadratus + +.–Zhen +et al +., in press: pl. 5, figs. 15–21 ( +cum syn +.). + + + + +Material +. One specimen (Sd) from limestone nodules within shales of the upper Yandaminta Quartzite and + +37 specimens +(4 Pb, 12 Sa, 12 Sb, 1 Sc, 8 Sd) from the overlying +Tabita Formation +at +Mount Arrowsmith + +; + +two specimens +(1 Sa, 1 Sd) from the unnamed dolomitic limestone unit at +Koonenberry Gap + +. + + + + +Remarks +. Five element +types +have been recovered from the Tabita Formation, including a scandodiform Pb element with a proclined cusp, four costae on the inner lateral face and a smooth outer lateral face ( +Fig. 27A–C +), and four scolopodiform elements: the symmetrical Sa ( +Fig. 27D–F +), nearly symmetrical Sb ( +Fig. 27G–I +), laterally compressed nearly symmetrical +Sc element +( +Fig. 27M–O +), and asymmetrical +Sd element +with slightly twisted cusp ( +Fig. 27J–L +). However, the species is highly variable, and there are intermediate morphotypes varying in the number of costae, symmetry, curvature of the cusp, and degree of lateral compression. + +Scolopodus quadratus + +also occurs in the slightly older Hensleigh Siltstone of the Lachlan Fold Belt (Zhen +et al +., in press). + + + + +Triangulodus +van Wamel, 1974 + + + + + + + +Type +species + +. + +Paltodus volchovensis +Sergeeva, 1963 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/9A/37439A20CB00FF16FEDAFF50FD21FF00.xml b/data/37/43/9A/37439A20CB00FF16FEDAFF50FD21FF00.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3a300f9d781 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/9A/37439A20CB00FF16FEDAFF50FD21FF00.xml @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + +Early Ordovician Conodonts from Far Western New South Wales, Australia + + + +Author + +Zhen, Yong Yi + + + +Author + +Percival, Ian G. + + + +Author + +Webby, Barry D. + +text + + +Records of the Australian Museum + + +2003 + +2003-08-13 + + +55 + + +2 + + +169 +220 + + + + +https://journals.australian.museum/zhen-et-al-2003-rec-aust-mus-552-169220/ + +journal article +10.3853/j.0067-1975.55.2003.1383 +2201-4349 + + + + + + + +Scolopodus +Pander, 1856 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + +. + +Scolopodus sublaevis +Pander, 1856 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/9A/37439A20CB00FF16FF5BFEC8FAEBFE09.xml b/data/37/43/9A/37439A20CB00FF16FF5BFEC8FAEBFE09.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..28d52f8e131 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/9A/37439A20CB00FF16FF5BFEC8FAEBFE09.xml @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ + + + +Early Ordovician Conodonts from Far Western New South Wales, Australia + + + +Author + +Zhen, Yong Yi + + + +Author + +Percival, Ian G. + + + +Author + +Webby, Barry D. + +text + + +Records of the Australian Museum + + +2003 + +2003-08-13 + + +55 + + +2 + + +169 +220 + + + + +https://journals.australian.museum/zhen-et-al-2003-rec-aust-mus-552-169220/ + +journal article +10.3853/j.0067-1975.55.2003.1383 +2201-4349 +10092797 + + + + + + + +Scolopodus multicostatus +Barnes & Tuke, 1970 + + + + + + + +Fig. 26A–R + + + + + +Scolopodus multicostatus +Barnes & Tuke, 1970: 92 + +, pl. 18, figs. 5, 9, 15, 16, text-fig. 6D. + + + +Scolopodus multicostatus + +.–Ethington & Clark, 1982: 101, pl. 11, figs. 19, 20. + + + + + +Scolopodus multicostatus + +.–Stait & Druce, 1993: 310, figs. 13H– + +I, 19F–J,L. + + + +Material +. + +85 specimens +(8 Pa, 14 Pb, 17 Sa, 17 Sb, 17 Sc, 12 Sd) from the +Tabita Formation +at +Mount Arrowsmith +, and + + +48 specimens +(3 Pa, 7 Pb, 6 Sa, 15 Sb, 12 Sc, 5 Sd) from the unnamed dolomitic limestone unit at +Koonenberry Gap + +. + + + + +Diagnosis +. A species of + +Scolopodus + +consisting of a seximembrate apparatus including two laterally compressed scandodiform +P elements +with a short base, and multicostate +S elements +with a longer base and a broad anterior margin; symmetrical Sa and +Sd elements +more or less rounded in cross section, asymmetrical Sb and +Sc elements +laterally more compressed. + + + + +Description +. +P elements +scandodiform with erect cusp; + +Pa element + +with a smooth outer lateral face; inner face multicostate with a median costa, an anterolateral costa, a posterior costa and a number of interposed weaker costae ( +Fig. 26A,B +). + +Pb +element + +has a stronger, more or less bladelike antero-inner lateral costa, and a costa along the posterior margin ( +Fig. 26C–E +); outer lateral face smooth or with a few weak, short costae near the base. + +Sa element + +symmetrical, with a reclined cusp which is more or less rounded in cross section, a broad smooth anterior face, and bearing three or more costae on each posterolateral face ( +Fig. 26F–I +). + +Sb element + +slightly asymmetrical, laterally compressed; cusp proclined with a broad anterior face and sharp posterior margin; the inner lateral face with two to four stronger costa and several finer ones in between; outer lateral face with a stronger anterolateral costa and several finer ones posterior to it ( +Fig. 26J,K,M,N +). + +Sc element + +asymmetrical, laterally compressed; cusp suberect with a sharp posterior costa along the posterior margin and a sharp anterolateral costa on the inner side ( +Fig. 26L +), as well as a number of weaker costae (typically three or four) on each lateral face; costae on the outer lateral face weaker than those on the inner lateral face ( +Fig. 26 O +). + +Sd element + +nearly symmetrical, less laterally compressed in comparison with the Sb and +Sc elements +; basal cavity opening rounded (often flared); broad anterior face, a costa along the posterior margin, with several costae on each of the lateral faces; the anterolateral costa on each side stronger than others ( +Fig. 26Q,R +). + + + + +Remarks +. Two species of + +Scolopodus + +are present in western +New South Wales +; + +S. multicostatus + +is distinguished in generally having fewer costae, which are also much weaker and not as sharp-edged as in the co-occurring + +S. quadratus + +. The Newfoundland +type +specimens of + +S. multicostatus + +figured by Barnes & Tuke (1970), which are all slightly asymmetrical with a short base and erect cusp, are identical to the +New South Wales +Sb elements +. Stait & Druce (1993) recognized a seximembrate apparatus for + +S. multicostatus + +from the Coolibah Formation of the Georgina Basin, including scandodiform (Pa), posteriorly keeled scandodiform (Pb), acontiodiform (Sa), planoconvex (Sb), laterally compressed paltodiform (Sc) and equidimensional paltodiform (Sd) elements. The Coolibah Formation material generally exhibits more numerous, strongly developed costae than do the specimens in western +New South Wales +; however, +Pa elements +from both areas are identical. Specimens referred to the symmetrical +Sa element +in our collections have weakly developed costae, a broader anterior face, and a more strongly reclined cusp in comparison with the +Sa element +illustrated from the Coolibah Formation (Stait & Druce, 1993, fig. 19L). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/9A/37439A20CB3EFF28FC7EFC78FA83FC30.xml b/data/37/43/9A/37439A20CB3EFF28FC7EFC78FA83FC30.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2a38c4a2d17 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/9A/37439A20CB3EFF28FC7EFC78FA83FC30.xml @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + +Early Ordovician Conodonts from Far Western New South Wales, Australia + + + +Author + +Zhen, Yong Yi + + + +Author + +Percival, Ian G. + + + +Author + +Webby, Barry D. + +text + + +Records of the Australian Museum + + +2003 + +2003-08-13 + + +55 + + +2 + + +169 +220 + + + + +https://journals.australian.museum/zhen-et-al-2003-rec-aust-mus-552-169220/ + +journal article +10.3853/j.0067-1975.55.2003.1383 +2201-4349 + + + + + + + +Drepanodus +Pander, 1856 + + + + + + + + +Type +species + +. + +Drepanodus arcuatus +Pander, 1856 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/AC/3743AC8384B8590CA881D8FF98569C30.xml b/data/37/43/AC/3743AC8384B8590CA881D8FF98569C30.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ad32be15bc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/AC/3743AC8384B8590CA881D8FF98569C30.xml @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ + + + +First record of the subfamily Epitraninae from Saudi Arabia (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Chalcididae), with the description of three new species + + + +Author + +Gadallah, Neveen S. +Entomology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt + + + +Author + +Soliman, Ahmed M. +Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. BOX 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia & Zoology Department, Faculty of Science (Boys), Al-Azhar University, P. O. Box 11884, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5284-713X +ammsoliman@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Dhafer, Hathal M. Al +Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. BOX 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4911-2332 + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +979 + + +35 +86 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.979.52059 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.979.52059 +1313-2970-979-35 +2B5B9363B75C4392A23A78186989B7F3 +2F4B35A2CA7C5E0E9B1AB671EE37390C + + + + +Epitranus inops Steffan, 1957 +Figures 25 +, 26 +, 27 + + + + +Epitranus inops +Steffan, 1957: 75, 86-88. Original description. ♀, ♂. Democratic Republic of Congo. + + +Epitranus inops +Steffan,1957: +Sauphanor et al. 1987 +: Ivory Coast: host. + + + +Re-description. + +Female +(Figs +25 +- +27 +). Body length 3.4-3.9 mm. Fore wing length 2.1-2.5 mm. Head, except frontal lobe and antennal toruli, black (Fig. +26A +); mesosoma reddish brown, with various extent of brownish, more or less dark, areas on mesoscutum, axilla, propodeum, mesopleuron, metepisternum anteriorly (Fig. +25B +); tegula testaceous (Fig. +25A, B +). This species is recognized by the following combination of characters: interantennal lamina present (Fig. +26A +); frontal lobe moderately long (Fig. +26B +); subantennal distance ca. 2.5 +x +as long as interantennal distance, with two submedian indentations on ventral edge (Fig. +26B +); supra antennal surface delimited laterally by faint step-like ridge; discal area faintly alutaceous, the network following curved lines, separated from inner orbit and median ocellus by four or five rows of moderately large punctures, interspaces between punctures smooth (Fig. +26A +); preorbital groove vestigial dorsally, progressively thickened towards the suborbital groove; outline of frons slightly and regularly convex in dorsal view; funiculars, from F2, somewhat transverse (Fig. +26C +); clava bi-segmented (Fig. +26C +). Mesosoma hardly convex, with flattened mesoscutellum (Fig. +25A, B +); setae on mesonotum thin, adpressed and longer than puncture diameter (Fig. +25B +); propodeum dull, with numerous irregular rugae, median areola complete, with subparallel sides (Fig. +26D +); adpetiolar areola with curved anterior carina (Fig. +26D +). Fore wing (Fig. +27A +) rather densely setose on apical half on underside; STV forming with anterior margin an angle of ca. 45°; metacoxal 2 +x +as long as wide, with flattened outer dorsal side; metafemur serrulate behind the basal tooth (Fig. +27B +); metatibial process only delimited posteriorly on inner side along tarsal scrobe, visible anteriorly through the presence of a wrinkle, tarsal scrobe far from reaching sub-basal prominence, the latter with four denticles on edge, visible solely from behind for being concealed by the pubescence (Fig. +27C +); metasomal petiole 3.4-3.7 +x +as long as wide, as long as or slightly shorter than dorsal length of Gt1 (0.95 +x +), and 0.50-0.65 +x +as long as gaster length, its sides hardly convex, with a weak median carina evanescent on apical third, sublateral and lateral ridges complete, the area between sublateral ridges smooth and shiny (Fig. +27D +); gaster 1.55-1.70 +x +as long as high (Fig. +25A +). + + + +Figure 25. + +Epitranus inops + +Steffan (female) +A, B +habitus (lateral and dorsal views respectively). + + + +Male +. Similar to female except flagellum 1.2 +x +head width; anellus ca. 0.3 +x +as long as wide; F1 twice as long as wide; F7 subquadrate; gastral petiole slightly longer, 4.5 +x +as long as wide ( +Steffan 1957 +). + + + +Figure 26. + +Epitranus inops + +Steffan (female) +A +head (frontal view) +B +lower part of face showing frontal lobe (frontal view) +C +antennal pedicel and flagellum +D +mesoscutellum and propodeum (dorsal view). + + + + +Hosts. + +The species was reared from stored yam together with + +Euzopherodes vapidella + +Man ( +Pyralidae +), and other small moths ( +Sauphanor et al. 1987 +). + + + +Material examined. + +1♀: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Al-Baha, Al Mikhwa, Shada Al-Ala Natural Reserve [ +19°50'34.87"N +, +41°18'40.04"E +, 1686 m], sweeping net, 5.V.2015, leg. Ahmed M. Soliman [KSMA]; 1♀, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Al-Baha, Al Mikhwa, Shada Al-Ala Natural Reserve [ +19°50'34.89"N +, +41°18'39.43"E +, 1689 m], sweeping net, 9.IV.2019, leg. Ahmed M. Soliman [KSMA]; 1♀, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Asir, Abha, Garf Raydah Natural Reserve [ +18°11'40.98"N +, +42°23'45.66"E +, 1861 m], sweeping net, 12.IV.2019, leg. Ahmed M. Soliman [KSMA]. + + + +Figure 27. + +Epitranus inops + +Steffan (female) +A +fore wing (parts of wing membrane and MV and STV magnified) +B, C +hind leg, excluding coxa (outer and ventral views respectively) +D +metasoma (dorsal view). + + + + +Distribution. + +Democratic Republic of Congo (Zaire) ( +Steffan 1957 +), Ivory Coast ( +Sauphanor et al. 1987 +), Saudi Arabia (Al-Baha and Asir regions) (new record). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/B2/3743B215FFFAFFDC47F374616218E148.xml b/data/37/43/B2/3743B215FFFAFFDC47F374616218E148.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..918dc224d9a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/B2/3743B215FFFAFFDC47F374616218E148.xml @@ -0,0 +1,230 @@ + + + +Loxosomella decorata n. sp., a new solitary entoproct from San Juan Island, WA, USA + + + +Author + +Nielsen, Claus + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +4238 + + +4 + + +594 +596 + + + +journal article +36327 +10.11646/zootaxa.4238.4.8 +39448593-749c-4ee0-bb13-3475cdc3b421 +1175-5326 +375522 +562FFA01-CAD8-4016-AF78-57C8EF0195C4 + + + + + + + +Loxosomella decorata + +n. sp. + + + + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Loxosomella decorata +. + +SEM (The body of the animal has shrunk during the dehydration). A, Holotype in frontal view. B, Paratype in right view. C, Paratype with a large and three small buds, frontal view. D, Foot of the holotype. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Loxosomella decorata + +. A, Half contracted specimen in frontal view, with a large and two smaller buds. B, Foot of a large specimen showing details of the structure (Nomarski contrast); the arrowheads indicate the two cells of the putative duo-gland adhesive system. Photos courtesy of Dr Julia Merkel (Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz). + + + + + + +Holotype + +: +Specimen +found in the tubes of the maldanid polychaete + +Axiothella rubrocincta +(Johnson, 1901) + +from an intertidal sandy-muddy bottom, +False Bay +, San Juan +Island +, WA + +, + +USA +, + +July 2007 + +, collected by +Dr Tim Wollesen + +. SEM preparation deposited in The Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen: ZMUC-ENT-27. +Fig. 1 +A,D. + + + + +Paratypes + +: SEM preparations are deposited at +The Natural History Museum +of +Denmark +: ZMUC-ENT- 28, -29, -30 ( +Fig. 2 +B), -31 ( +Fig. 2 +C). +The +COI +gene of other specimens was partially sequenced and the 710 bp sequence deposited in +GenBank +(acc. # +JQ614997 +) ( + +Merkel +et al. +2012 + +). + + + + + +Etymology +: The specific epithet + +decorata + +refers to the crenelated latero-posterior edges of the attachment organs of the foot. + + + + +Description +: A medium sized species total length (from the upper edge of the tentacle membrane to the ‘heel’ of the foot) up to about 950 µm. Twelve long tentacles in the adults and ten in the large buds. The width of the tentacle membrane is up to about 400 µm. The body is widest at the median part of the body, up to about 300 µm. From there, the body tapers gradually towards the foot; the lateral parts of the body below the stomach are thin ‘lateral wings’. The foot is up to about 275 µm long. It has a conspicuous foot gland, a foot groove with accessory gland cells, and a pair of rounded adhesive organs at the tip ( +Fig. 2 +B). Two cells of different appearance are associated with each adhesive organ, indicating a duo gland system ( +Hermans 1983 +). The adhesive organs are thin with scalloped lateroposterior edges. Buds develop from a pair of latero-frontal zones level with the upper wall of the stomach. Up to two buds on each side have been observed. The largest bud had a total length of about 400 µm; it had ten tentacles. Up to 20 small eggs/embryos, diameter about 50 µm, have been observed in the atrium ( +Fig. 2 +A). The larvae are clearly of the small, planktotrophic +type +found for example in + +L. atkinsae +( +Fuchs & Wanninger 2008 +) + +and + +L. elegans +( +Nielsen 1971 +) + +. + + + + +Discussion +: About 120 species have been referred to the genus + +Loxosomella + +s.l. +( +Nielsen 2010 +; + +Varela +et al. +2011 + +). There is a wide variation of morphology, but a number of characters distinguish groups of species, which are sometimes treated as genera ( +Iseto & Hirose 2010 +). The most important characters are found in the morphology and fate of the differentiated foot of the buds, the defining character of the genus ( +Iseto & Hirose 2010 +). The attachment of the buds to the parent can be either with the tip of the foot or with the back side of the body. The foot can persist after attachment or be lost after having secreted the cement attaching the specimen permanently to the substratum (variable in a few species, see ( +Nielsen 1964 +; +Nielsen & Jespersen 1997 +)). The foot can have a pointed tip or it can have two or four small attachment organs at the tip, or papillae all the way around the foot; it may also have lateral, wing-like expansions. The number of tentacles seems to be rather constant in species with eight or ten tentacles, but to vary in species with higher numbers of tentacles. However species with 12 tentacles in the adults usually attain a stage with 10–12 tentacles already in the large buds, whereas species with higher numbers of tentacles appear to add new tentacles after settling of the buds. + + +The new species has 12 tentacles in the adult and +10 in +the large buds. Its buds are attached to the parent with the tip of the foot, which is retained in the adults. The foot is of a +type +close to that described from +Loxoxomella +s.str. ( +Iseto & Hirose 2010 +; +Nielsen & Jespersen 1997 +), and it shows a pair of characteristic attachment organs at the tip ( +Fig. 2 +B). The foot lacks lateral wings. Among the previously described species, this combination of characters is found only in two species: + +L. elegans + +and + +L. vancouverensis +( +Rundell & Leander 2012 +) + +. + +L. elegans + +has a prominent Y-shaped row of large cells on the posterior side if the body lacking in the new species and both species lack the characteristic scalloped lateroposterior edges of the attachment organs. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/BE/3743BE522B3758F59647816F3AE30EA8.xml b/data/37/43/BE/3743BE522B3758F59647816F3AE30EA8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eb63572fdc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/BE/3743BE522B3758F59647816F3AE30EA8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ + + + +Unveiling ancient diversity of long-tailed wasps (Hymenoptera: Megalyridae): new taxa from Cretaceous Kachin and Taimyr ambers and their phylogenetic affinities + + + +Author + +Brazidec, Manuel +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0860-8972 +Univ Rennes, CNRS, Geosciences Rennes, UMR 6118, 35000, Rennes, France & Institut de Syste ́ matique, E ́ volution, Biodiversite ́ (ISYEB), Muse ́ um national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Universite ́, EPHE, Universite ́ des Antilles, CP 50, 57 rue Cuvier, F- 75005 Paris, France & State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China +manuel.brazidec@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Vilhelmsen, Lars +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5593-5722 +Natural History Museum of Denmark, SCIENCE, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK- 2100, Denmark + + + +Author + +Boudinot, Brendon E. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4588-0430 +Institut fuer Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung, Friedrich-Schiller-Universitaet Jena, Vor dem Neutor 1, 07743 Jena, Germany & National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 10 th & Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC, USA & Senckenberg Gesellschaft fuer Naturforschung und Naturmuseum, Frankfurt am Main, 60325 Germany + + + +Author + +Richter, Adrian +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5627-2302 +Institut fuer Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung, Friedrich-Schiller-Universitaet Jena, Vor dem Neutor 1, 07743 Jena, Germany & Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna-son, Okinawa, Japan + + + +Author + +Hammel, Joerg U. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6744-6811 +Institute of Materials Physics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany + + + +Author + +Perkovsky, Evgeny E. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7959-4379 +Natural History Museum of Denmark, SCIENCE, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK- 2100, Denmark & I. I. Schmalhausen Institut of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, B. Khmelnitskogo 15, Kiev 01030, Ukraine + + + +Author + +Fan, Yong +Fushun Amber Institute, Fushun 113005, China + + + +Author + +Wang, Zhen +Natural History Museum of Denmark, SCIENCE, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK- 2100, Denmark & College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, 105 Xisanhuanbeilu, Haidian District, Beijing 100048, China + + + +Author + +Wu, Qiong +Natural History Museum of Denmark, SCIENCE, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK- 2100, Denmark & College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, 105 Xisanhuanbeilu, Haidian District, Beijing 100048, China + + + +Author + +Wang, Bo +State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China + + + +Author + +Perrichot, Vincent +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7973-0430 +Univ Rennes, CNRS, Geosciences Rennes, UMR 6118, 35000, Rennes, France + +text + + +Arthropod Systematics & amp; Phylogeny + + +2024 + +2024-03-22 + + +82 + + +151 +181 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.82.e111148 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.82.e111148 +1864-8312-82-151 +43AC036E93CC4D79939A07DF54BE1A2D +8D187145BFCA55A1A73960CDE5BD124B + + + + +3.1.1.1.2. † +Cretolyra shawi +sp. nov. + + + + +Figures 2B +, 4 + + + +Etymology. + +The specific epithet is a patronym honoring Scott R. Shaw, for his contributions to the knowledge of +Megalyridae +. + + + +Material studied. + + + +Holotype + +female NIGP203545; housed in the +Nanjing Institute of Geology +and +Paleontology +(NIGP), +Chinese Academy of Sciences +, +Nanjing +, +China +. + + + + +Type locality. +Noije Bum Hill, Hukawng Valley, Kachin State, Myanmar. + + +Age. +Upper Albian to lower Cenomanian, mid-Cretaceous. + + +Diagnosis. + +Pedicel bilobed, long and thick (Figs +4D-E +; vs. calciform and elongate in + +Cretolyra noijebumensis + +gen. et sp. nov. +); axillae almost rounded and reduced on edges of mesoscutellum, not contiguous medially (vs. contiguous medially in + +Cretolyra noijebumensis + +gen. et sp. nov. +); axillar grooves smooth (Fig. +4A +; vs. axillar grooves crenulated in + +Cretolyra noijebumensis + +gen. et sp. nov. +); medial cell nearly triangular, with 1m-cu very short (Fig. +2B +; vs. medial cell rectangular, with 1m-cu distinct in + +Cretolyra noijebumensis + +gen. et sp. nov. +). + + + +Description. + +Body length 2.82 mm. - +Head +globular, higher than long (length ca. 0.40 mm), covered with short setae; frons convex, smooth, divided by sulcus; compound eye oval, higher than long; vertex convex; clypeus smooth, apically rounded; mandibles symmetrical, with three teeth; toruli separated from each other by less than their own diameter; subantennal groove present; antenna about half body length; scape shorter than pedicel; pedicel thick, bilobed; flagellomeres cylindrical, longer than wide; flagellomere 1 shorter than flagellomeres 2-5 (length 0.15 mm vs. ca. 0.21 mm); flagellomeres 6-11 shorter (length ca. 0.10 mm); flagellomere 12 as long as flagellomere 1 (length 0.15 mm); occipital carina minutely crenulate. - +Mesosoma +one third of body length (length 0.98 mm); mesoscutum convex, divided by smooth median mesoscutal sulcus; parapsidal lines present; axillae small, almost rounded and not contiguous medially; axillar groove smooth; mesoscutellum smooth, convex, diamond-shaped; pronotum smooth, not visible dorsally, with posteromedial part moderately high as viewed laterally; anterior thoracic spiracle not surrounded by pronotal cuticle posteriorly; mesometapectal sulcus crenulate; propodeum carinate. - +Fore wing +hyaline and covered with microtrichiae, two thirds of body length (length 2.57 mm); pterostigma reduced; C, Sc+R, M+Cu, A, Rs fully pigmented; R1 extending beyond marginal cell; Rs closing marginal cell in straight line; M pigmented to apex; medial cell small, elongate and rectangular, nearly triangular by side of 1m-cu. - +Legs +with two mesotibial and one metatibial spurs; metacoxa elongate; metafemur and metatibia swollen; metabasitarsus two to three times as long as remaining metatarsomeres; row of comb-like setae along ventral surface of metatibia and metabasitarsus. - +Metasoma +longer than mesosoma (length 1.44 mm); elongate and narrowed at apex; tergites smooth; hypopygium well-developed; ovipositor shorter than metasoma (length 1.33 mm; OL/BL ratio 0.43), sheaths fully preserved, transversely striated. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/43/EA/3743EA78CC6A039AF3515E8F0AEDD018.xml b/data/37/43/EA/3743EA78CC6A039AF3515E8F0AEDD018.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fe251dbddfa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/43/EA/3743EA78CC6A039AF3515E8F0AEDD018.xml @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ + + + +Polychaetes of Greece: an updated and annotated checklist + + + +Author + +Faulwetter, Sarah + + + +Author + +Simboura, Nomiki + + + +Author + +Katsiaras, Nikolaos + + + +Author + +Chatzigeorgiou, Giorgos + + + +Author + +Arvanitidis, Christos + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2017 + +5 + + +20997 +20997 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 +1314-2828--20997 + + + + + +Syllis parapari San +Martin +& +Lopez +, 2000 + + + + +Notes + +Probably recorded under the name +Syllis cornuta +before the year 2000 (see discussion under +Syllis cornuta +). In the Mediterranean also known from Cyprus, ( + +Cinar +and Ergen 2003 + +), Turkey ( + +Cinar +et al. 2014 + +) and the Adriatic ( +Mikac 2015 +), otherwise known from the Atlantic coast of the Iberian Peninsula and from the British Isles ( + +San +Martin +2003 + +, + +San +Martin +and Worsfold 2015 + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/44/87/374487C6A19E956204C0760E2886CB99.xml b/data/37/44/87/374487C6A19E956204C0760E2886CB99.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8c4b6b5cea2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/44/87/374487C6A19E956204C0760E2886CB99.xml @@ -0,0 +1,410 @@ + + + +The hyper-diverse ant genus Tetramorium Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in the Malagasy region taxonomic revision of the T. naganum, T. plesiarum, T. schaufussii, and T. severini species groups + + + +Author + +Hita Garcia, Francisco + + + +Author + +Fisher, Brian L. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2014 + +413 + + +1 +170 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.413.7172 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.413.7172 +1313-2970-413-1 +5791CE9C1CC0472095838A585DA79446 +5791CE9C1CC0472095838A585DA79446 + + + + +Tetramorium bressleri Hita Garcia & Fisher +sp. n. +Figs 10E, 11C, 12C, 13C, 14B, 15, 62 + + + +Type material. + +Holotype, pinned worker, MADAGASCAR, Mahajanga, Parc National de Namoroka, 9.8 km 300° WNW Vilanandro, +16.46667°S +, +45.35°E +, 140 m, tropical dry forest, sifted litter (leaf mold, rotten wood), collection code BLF06446, 4.-8.XI.2002 (B.L. Fisher et al.) (CAS: CASENT0035677). Paratypes, 27 pinned workers with same data as holotype (BMNH: CASENT0035669; CAS: CASENT0035636; CASENT0035640; CASENT0035642; CASENT0035647; CASENT0035648; CASENT0035649; CASENT0035652; CASENT0035653; CASENT0035654; CASENT0035656; CASENT0035658; CASENT0035660; CASENT0035662; CASENT0035666; CASENT0035667; CASENT0035670; CASENT0035674; CASENT0035675; CASENT0035678; CASENT0035681; CASENT0035686; CASENT0035687; CASENT0035689; CASENT0035694; CASENT0035703; MCZ: CASENT0035646). + + + +Figure 15. +Tetramorium bressleri +holotype worker (CASENT0035677). A Body in profile B Body in dorsal view C Head in full-face view. + + + + +Non-type material. + +MADAGASCAR: Antananarivo, Reserve Speciale +d'Ambohitantely +, +Foret +Ambohitantely, 20.9 km 72°NE Ankazobe, +18.2253°S +, +47.2868°E +, 1410 m, montane rainforest, 17.-22.IV.2001 ( +B +.L. Fisher et al.); Antsiranana, +Foret +d'Anabohazo +, 21.6 km 247° WSW Maromandia, +14.3089°S +, +47.9143°E +, 120 m, tropical dry forest, 11.-16.III.2001 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Fianarantsoa, Ampangabe I Non Protected Area, 21.4 km W Itremo, +20.6111°S +, +46.6069°E +, 1414 m, savannah woodland, 21.-23.III.2010 (A. Ravelomanana); Fianarantsoa, Ampangabe II Non Protected Area, 21.29 km W Itremo, +20.6114°S +, +46.6081°E +, 1402 m, savannah woodland, 21.-23.III.2010 (A. Ravelomanana); Fianarantsoa, Ampangabe VI Non Protected Area, 21.16 km W Itremo, +20.6144°S +, +46.6104°E +, 1379 m, shrubland, 21.-23.III.2010 (A. Ravelomanana); Fianarantsoa, Ampangoabe V Non Protected Area, 21.37 km W Itremo, +20.6136°S +, +46.608°E +, 1449 m, shrubland, 22.-23.III.2010 (A. Ravelomanana); Fianarantsoa, Ampotoampoto I National Parc, 8.02 km NW Ilakaka, +22.6283°S +, +45.1886°E +, 917 m, savannah woodland, 26.-28.II.2010 (A. Ravelomanana); Fianarantsoa, +Foret +d'Analalava +, 29.6 km 280° W Ranohira, +22.5917°S +, +45.1283°E +, 700 m, 1.-5.II.2003 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Fianarantsoa, Antohatsahomby I Non Protected Area, 22.77 km NW Ambatofinandrahana, +20.5506°S +, +46.5856°E +, 1550 m, +Uapaca +woodland, 15.-17.III.2010 (A. Ravelomanana); Fianarantsoa, +Foret +d'Atsirakambiaty +, 7.6 km 285° WNW Itremo, +20.5933°S +, +46.5633°E +, 1550 m, montane rainforest, 22.-26.I.2003 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Fianarantsoa, Parc National +d'Isalo +, 9.1 km 354° N Ranohira, +22.4817°S +, +45.4617°E +, 725 m, gallery forest, 27.-31.I.2003 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Fianarantsoa, Parc National +d'Isalo +, Ambovo Springs, 29.3 km 4° N Ranohira, +22.2983°S +, +45.3517°E +, 990 m, +Uapaca +woodland, 9.-14.II.2003 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Fianarantsoa, Mampiarika I Non Protected Area, 28.08 km SW Ambositra, +20.7344°S +, +47.0835°E +, 1480 m, +Uapaca +woodland, 31.I.-2.II.2010 (A. Ravelomanana); Mahajanga, +Foret +Ambohimanga, 26.1 km 314° Mampikony, +15.9627°S +, +47.4382°E +, 250 m, tropical dry forest, 13.-15.XII.2004 (B.L. Fisher); Mahajanga, Boeny Region, District of Soalala, Analamanitra forest, 14 km SW Mitsinjo, +16.7°S +, +45.7°E +, 19 m, dense dry forest, 26.II.-4.III.2008 (M. +Rin'ha +); Mahajanga, Parc National +d'Ankarafantsika +, Ampijoroa Station Forestiere, 40 km 306° NW Andranofasika, +16.3208°S +, +46.8107°E +, 130 m, tropical dry forest, 26.III.-1.IV.2001 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Parc National +d'Ankarafantsika +, Ampijoroa Station Forestiere, 5.4 km 331° NW Andranofasika, +16.2989°S +, +46.813°E +, 70 m, tropical dry forest, 26.III.-1.IV.2001 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Parc National +d'Ankarafantsika +, +Foret +de Tsimaloto, 18.3 km 46° NE de Tsaramandroso, +16.2281°S +, +47.1436°E +, 135 m, tropical dry forest, 2.IV.-8.IV.2001 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Parc National de Baie de Baly, 12.4 km 337° NNW Soalala, +16.01°S +, +45.265°E +, 10 m, tropical dry forest, 26.-30.XI.2002 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Reserve Forestiere Beanka, 50.2 km E Maintirano, +18.0265°S +, +44.0505°E +, 250 m, tropical dry forest on tsingy, 19.-26.X.2009 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Reserve Forestiere Beanka, 52.7 km E Maintirano, +18.0622°S +, +44.5259°E +, 300 m, tropical dry forest on tsingy, 24.-27.X.2009 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Reserve Forestiere Beanka, 50.7 km E Maintirano, +17.8802°S +, +44.4688°E +, 140 m, tropical dry forest on tsingy, 29.X.-1.XI.2009 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Reserve Forestiere Beanka, 50.2 km E Maintirano, +17.8876°S +, +44.4726°E +, 153 m, tropical dry forest on tsingy, 31.X.2009 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Reserve Speciale de Bemarivo, 23.8 km 223° SW Besalampy, +16.925°S +, +44.3683°E +, 30 m, tropical dry forest, 19.-23.XI.2002 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Mahavavy River, 6.2 km 145° SE Mitsinjo, +16.0517°S +, +45.9083°E +, 20 m, gallery forest, 1.-5.XII.2002 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Parc National de Namoroka, 9.8 km 300° WNW Vilanandro, +16.4667°S +, +45.35°E +, 140 m, tropical dry forest, 4.-8.XI.2002 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Parc National de Namoroka, 17.8 km 329° WNW Vilanandro, +16.3767°S +, +45.3267°E +, 100 m, tropical dry forest, 8.-12.XI.2002 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Parc National de Namoroka, 16.9 km 317° NW Vilanandro, +16.4067°S +, +45.31°E +, 100 m, tropical dry forest, 12.-16.XI.2002 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Parc National Tsingy de Bemaraha, 3.4 km 93° E Bekopaka, Tombeau Vazimba, +19.1419°S +, +44.828°E +, 50 m, tropical dry forest, 6.-10.XI.2001 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Parc National Tsingy de Bemaraha, 2.5 km 62° ENE Bekopaka, Ankidrodroa River, +19.1322°S +, +44.8147°E +, 100 m, 11.-15.XI.2001 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Mahajanga, Parc National Tsingy de Bemaraha, 10.6 km ESE 123° Antsalova, +18.7094°S +, +44.7182°E +, 150 m, tropical dry forest on tsingy, 16.-20.XI.2001 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Toliara, Parc National +d'Andohahela +, +Foret +d'Ambohibory +, 1.7 km 61° ENE Tsimelahy, 36.1 km 308° NW Tolagnaro, +24.93°S +, +46.6455°E +, 300 m, tropical dry forest, 16.-20.I.2002 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Toliara, Andohahela National Park, Tsimelahy, +24.9368°S +, +46.6267°E +, 180 m, transition forest, 16.-26.II.2003 (M.E. Irwin et al.); Toliara, 18 km NNW Betroka, +23.1633°S +, +45.9686°E +, 825 m, savannah, 24.XI.-4.XII.1994 (M.A. Ivie & D. A. Pollock); Toliara, Atsimo Andrefana Region, District of Betioky, 30 km E Betioky, Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, +23.6865°S +, +44.591°E +, 165 m, gallery dry deciduous forest, 1.-7.I.2002 (M. +Rin'ha +); Toliara, Beza-Mahafaly, 27 km E Betioky, +23.65°S +, +44.6333°E +, 135 m, tropical dry forest, 23.IV.1997 (B.L. Fisher); Toliara, Fiherenana, +23.1769°S +, +43.9608°E +, 100 m, gallery forest, 21.-24.X.2002 (Frontier Project); Toliara, Fiherenana, +23.177°S +, +43.9614°E +, gallery forest, 18.-19.VII.2003 (Frontier Wilderness Project); Toliara, southern Isoky-Vohimena Forest, 59 km NE Sakaraha, +22.4667°S +, +44.85°E +, 730 m, tropical dry forest, 21.I.1996 (B.L. Fisher); Toliara, Makay Mts., +21.2098°S +, +45.3418°E +, 525 m, gallery forest on sandy soil, 27.XI.-2.XII.2010 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Toliara, Makay Mts., +21.2199°S +, +45.324°E +, 500 m, gallery forest on sandy soil, 24.XI.-12.XII.2010 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Toliara, Makay Mts., +21.31°S +, +45.1295°E +, 590 m, dry forest on sandy soil, 3.-6.XII.2010 (B.L. Fisher et al.); Toliara, Vohibasia Forest, 59 km NE Sakaraha, +22.4667°S +, +44.85°E +, 780 m, tropical dry forest, 13.I.1996 (B.L. Fisher); Toliara, Parc National de Zombitse, near road, +22.8405°S +, +44.7312°E +, 825 m, spiny deciduous forest, 15.X.2001-23.III.2002 (R. +Harin'Hala +); Toliara, Parc National de Zombitse, near ANGAP office, +22.8865°S +, +44.6922°E +, 840 m, deciduous spiny forest, 9.XI.2001-26.I.2002 (R. +Harin'Hala +); Toliara, Parc National de Zombitse, 19.8 km 84° E Sakaraha, +22.8433°S +, +44.71°E +, 770 m, tropical dry forest, 5.-9.II.2003 (B.L. Fisher et al.). + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Tetramorium +bressleri + +can be recognised by the following combination of characters: larger species (HW 0.80-1.00; WL 0.92-1.15); eyes relatively small (OI 18-19); petiolar node high nodiform, not blocky and massively enlarged, anterodorsal and posterodorsal margins at about the same height and equally marginate, anterodorsal margin not protruding anteriorly nor very sharply angled; petiolar node in profile relatively high and thin, between 1.6 to 1.8 times higher than long (LPeI 56-61), in dorsal view between 1.3 to 1.5 times wider than long (DPeI 135-145); gaster never extremely enlarged and swollen; head and mesosoma without strongly developed and conspicuous reticulate-punctate ground sculpture; usually sculpture on the mesopleuron and lateral propodeum mostly absent; basal half of first gastral tergite not strongly reticulate-rugose, only base of tergite weakly sculptured; pilosity on first gastral tergite mostly erect. + + + +Worker measurements +(N=12). HL 0.81-1.00 (0.94); HW 0.80-1.00 (0.94); SL 0.51-0.64 (0.60); EL 0.15-0.19 (0.18); PH 0.42-0.53 (0.48); PW 0.57-0.73 (0.68); WL 0.92-1.15 (1.07); PSL 0.24-0.32 (0.27); PTL 0.20-0.26 (0.23); PTH 0.35-0.42 (0.40); PTW 0.28-0.36 (0.32); PPL 0.23-0.30 (0.27); PPH 0.32-0.41 (0.38); PPW 0.35-0.45 (0.42); CI 98-102 (100); SI 62-65 (64); OI 18-19 (19); DMI 61-66 (64); LMI 43-47 (45); PSLI 26-32 (28); PeNI 45-49 (47); LPeI 56-61 (58); DPeI 135-145 (138); PpNI 59-63 (61); LPpI 70-75 (73); DPpI 150-158 (152); PPI 125-134 (130). + + +Worker description. + +Head more or less as long as broad (CI 98-102); posterior head margin weakly concave. Anterior clypeal margin with distinct median impression. Frontal carinae strongly developed and forming dorsal margin of very well-developed antennal scrobes, scrobes moderately to very deep and with clearly defined margins all around; median scrobal carina very well developed and distinctly surpassing posterior eye level, usually ending halfway between posterior eye margin and posterior scrobe margin. Antennal scapes short, not reaching posterior head margin (SI 62-65). Eyes relatively small (OI 18-19). Mesosomal outline in profile weakly to moderately convex, rounded and high (LMI 43-47), moderately to strongly marginate from lateral to dorsal mesosoma; promesonotal suture and metanotal groove absent. Propodeal spines elongate-triangular to spinose, long, and acute (PSLI 26-32), propodeal lobes short, triangular, and acute, always much shorter than propodeal spines. Petiolar node in profile high, rectangular nodiform with well defined antero- and posterodorsal margins, between 1.6 to 1.8 times higher than long (LPeI 56-61), anterior and posterior faces approximately parallel, anterodorsal and posterodorsal margins situated at about the same height, petiolar dorsum flat to weakly convex, anterodorsal margin not protruding anteriorly; node in dorsal view between 1.3 to 1.5 times wider than long (DPeI 135-145), in dorsal view pronotum between 2.0 to 2.2 times wider than petiolar node (PeNI 45-49). Postpetiole in profile subglobular and weakly anteroposteriorly compressed, approximately 1.3 to 1.4 times higher than long (LPpI 70-75); in dorsal view around 1.5 to 1.6 times wider than long (DPpI 150-158), pronotum between 1.6 to 1.7 times wider than postpetiole (PpNI 59-63). Postpetiole in profile appearing slightly less voluminous than petiolar node, postpetiole in dorsal view between 1.2 to 1.4 times wider than petiolar node (PPI 125-134). Mandibles variably sculptured, either unsculptured, smooth, and shining, or partly or fully finely rugulose; clypeus longitudinally rugose/rugulose, with five to eight distinct rugae, median ruga always distinct, lateral rugae often weaker and sometimes interrupted; cephalic dorsum between frontal carinae with ten to thirteen longitudinal rugae, rugae running from posterior clypeal margin to posterior head margin, rarely interrupted or with cross-meshes; scrobal area mostly unsculptured, smooth and shiny; lateral head mainly longitudinally rugose. Ground sculpture on head usually weak to absent. Dorsum of mesosoma mostly longitudinally rugose without any distinct ground sculpture, spaces between rugae smooth and shining; lateral pronotum irregularly longitudinally rugose, often with weak to moderate punctate ground sculpture, mesopleuron and lateral pro +podeum +usually with very little sculpture, few irregular rugae/rugulae and no ground sculpture. Forecoxae often with weak ground sculpture, but generally very smooth and shining. Petiolar node laterally with conspicuous but relatively weak reticulate-punctate ground sculpture only, appearing weakly matte but still relatively smooth and shiny; dorsum of node medially almost unsculptured, smooth, and shiny, surrounding areas rugulose, ground sculpture on petiolar dorsum neglectable. Postpetiole laterally and dorsally weakly to moderately rugose/rugulose and with conspicuous, moderate reticulate-punctate ground sculpture, appearing relatively matte; base of first gastral tergite usually weakly punctate and/or costulate and/or shagreened, remainder of tergite unsculptured, smooth, and shining. Whole body with abundant, long, and fine standing hairs; first gastral tergite with abundant, long, erect hairs and much scarcer, shorter, decumbent to subdecumbent hairs. Anterior edges of antennal scapes and dorsal (outer) surfaces of hind tibiae with decumbent to suberect hairs. Body usually of uniform brown, appendages often lighter. + + + +Etymology. +The name of the new species is a patronym dedicated to Dr. Barry Lee Bressler, retired physicist, former adjunct professor of physics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, and amateur naturalist, in recognition of his interest in myrmecology and his support of ant taxonomy. + + +Distribution and biology. + +As mentioned above, it is surprising that most species in the species group, except the holotype of +Tetramorium plesiarum +, were previously unknown. This is especially true for +Tetramorium bressleri +. It is by far the most common and abundant species of the +Tetramorium plesiarum +group. The material available was sampled in many localities and includes more than 500 mounted specimens with many more in alcohol. The distribution ranges of all group members strongly overlap, but the range of +Tetramorium bressleri +is by far the largest; this species is known from many more localities than the other four (Fig. 62). The southernmost localities are Andohahela, Beza Mahafaly, and Fiherenana, and from there the distribution ranges north through much of western Madagascar up to the northernmost known locality Anabohazo. The eastern limit of the range goes in an almost straight line north from Andohahela through Mampiarika, Ambohitantely, and Ambohimanga to Anabohazo. The new species prefers arid habitats such as tropical dry forests, tropical dry forests on tsingy, gallery forests, spiny deciduous forests, savannah woodland, +Uapaca +woodland, and spiny thickets. The elevational range of the species is a relatively broad one, ranging from 10 to 1550 m, but most of the material was collected at low elevations (ca. 420 m on average). +Tetramorium bressleri +was mainly sampled by pitfall trapping and litter sifting, suggesting a ground-active life style. + + + +Discussion. + + +Tetramorium +bressleri + +is not likely to be confused with +Tetramorium gollum +, +Tetramorium hobbit +, or +Tetramorium mars +, whereas differentiating between +Tetramorium bressleri +and +Tetramorium plesiarum +can be challenging at first glance. +Tetramorium bressleri +lacks the enlarged gaster and strong reticulate-rugose sculpture on the basal half of the first gastral tergite seen in +Tetramorium gollum +, nor does it have the blocky petiolar node shape of +Tetramorium mars +or the massively enlarged petiolar node of +Tetramorium hobbit +. The separation from +Tetramorium plesiarum +requires more attention and caution. The main and obvious difference is body size. +Tetramorium bressleri +is usually a much larger species (HW 0.80-1.00; WL 0.92-1.15) than +Tetramorium plesiarum +(HW 0.80-1.00; WL 0.92-1.15). There is some overlap, but this is mainly due to a few very small specimens of +Tetramorium bressleri +and one very large specimen of +Tetramorium plesiarum +. Otherwise, both species fall neatly into their respective size ranges. However, body size alone should not be used as a primary diagnostic character, and in this case, we provide more evidence for their heterospecificity. The eyes of +Tetramorium plesiarum +(OI 21-23) are larger than in +Tetramorium bressleri +(OI 18-19), although this is often difficult to assess without measuring. In addition, both can be separated by the sculpture on the mesopleuron and lateral propodeum; this sculpture is usually mostly absent in +Tetramorium bressleri +, making the area appear very smooth and shiny, while it is usually longitudinally rugose with reticulate-punctate ground sculpture in +Tetramorium plesiarum +. The sculpture on the sides of the petiolar node varies too, since it is much more reticulate-punctate and matte in +Tetramorium plesiarum +than in +Tetramorium bressleri +, in which the weak reticulate-punctate ground sculpture looks faintly matte but still relatively smooth and shiny. The shape of the petiolar node in profile is an additional useful character. In +Tetramorium plesiarum +the anterodorsal margin of the node protrudes anteriorly and is a bit more marginate than the more rounded posterodorsal margin, while in +Tetramorium bressleri +both margins are usually equally marginate and the anterodorsal margin does not protrude anteriorly at all. + + +Considering how common and abundant +Tetramorium bressleri +is in western Madagascar, it is interesting that it shows very little intraspecific variation and remains very stable in its morphology. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/46/374546E0BC393C22B8615B3A4F3D8756.xml b/data/37/45/46/374546E0BC393C22B8615B3A4F3D8756.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e012f9119da --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/46/374546E0BC393C22B8615B3A4F3D8756.xml @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Braconidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Mark R. + + + +Author + +Godfray, H. Charles J. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8151 +8151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 +1314-2828-4-8151 + + + + + +Microplitis tuberculatus ( +Bouche +, 1834) + + + + + +Microgaster tuberculatus +Bouche +, 1834 + + +fumipennis +(Ratzeburg, 1852, +Microgaster +) + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F2CFFBE37C9FB05D7E1FBD2.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F2CFFBE37C9FB05D7E1FBD2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..25457b9e84b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F2CFFBE37C9FB05D7E1FBD2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips virgulatus + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 5 +, +31 +) + + + + +Female aptera +: Body and femora light brown, tube darkest, head yellow between eyes; all tarsi and tibiae yellow, antennal segments I and II light brown, III yellow in basal half, IV–VIII dark brown. + + +Antennal segment VIII broadly joined to VII ( +Fig. 31 +), only 2 sense cones on each of III and IV. Head slightly longer than wide (cf. +Fig. 5 +), without ocelli or reticulation; cheeks with one pair of small stout setae; po setae long and capitate; mouth cone rounded; maxillary pillars slender and about 40 microns long, maxillary levers rotated medially, stylets retracted anterior to occipital ridge. Pronotum transverse, without sculpture, major setae capitate, although am setae short. Mesonotum with weak transverse reticulation, lateral setal pair capitate. Metanotum without sculpture on anterior half, with longitudinal sculptured ridges on posterior half, major setal pair finely pointed. Fore tarsus with small tooth. Prosternal ferna not meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to 2 sclerites. +Pelta +broadly rounded, sculpture faint; tergites with 2 pairs of small straight wing-retaining setae; setae S1 and S2 on IX weakly capitate. + + +Measurements +( +holotype +female aptera in microns). Body length 1350. Head, length 150; width 130; po setae 40. Pronotum, length 100; width 190; major setae—am 10, aa 20, ml 20, epim 25, pa 25. Mesonotal lateral seta 20. Tergite IX setae +S1 65 +, +S2 75 +. Tube length 90. Antennal segments III–VIII length 40, 38, 40, 35, 35, 25. + + +Male aptera +: Small male similar to female; large male with larger fore tarsal tooth and fore tibia with tubercle on inner apex; metanotum more strongly sculptured, posterior ocelli weakly developed ( +Fig. 5 +); tergite IX setae S2 short and stout; sternite VIII without a pore plate, but III–V laterally with paired transverse rows of specialised reticulation. + + + + + + +Material +studied + +. +Holotype +female aptera, + +Northern Territory + +, +Darwin +, +Holmes Jungle +, from dead branches, + +8.v.2014 + +( + +LAM +6014 + +). + + +Paratypes: 2 male apterae taken with holotype. + + + + +Comments. +As indicated in the key, the colour of the head is unique in this species, and the male has no pore plate on sternite VIII. The longitudinal sculpture on the metanotum is more strongly developed in the large male ( +Fig. 5 +) than in the smaller male and female +holotype +. +Similar +but weaker sculpture has been noted on the metanotum in large males of + +norfuki + +from +Norfolk Island +. +Apart +from this, + +virgulatus + +is a typical member of the genus, with the stylets scarcely retracted anterior to the occipital ridge, and the fore tibiae of males with a small tubercle on the inner apex. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F2EFFBC37C9F887D332FE9D.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F2EFFBC37C9F887D332FE9D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..043dbbc2b01 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F2EFFBC37C9F887D332FE9D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips regina + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 4 +, +29. 34 +) + + + + +Female microptera +: Body and femora brown, tergites VI–VIII yellow medially; tibiae and tarsi clear yellow; antennal segment I–II and IV–VIII brown, III yellow, IV pale at base. + + +Antennal segment VIII slightly constricted at base ( +Fig. 29 +), IV–VII with narrow pedicel; III and IV each with three sense cones. Head longer than wide, ocelli absent, cheeks with weak setae ( +Fig. 4 +); vertex weakly sculptured; po setae long and capitate; maxillary pillars short, about 35 microns with the levers even shorter and curving dorsally, stylets wide apart, retracted anterior to occipital ridge. Pronotum transverse, without sculpture except near posterior margin; major setae capitate, am setae scarcely 0.5 as long as aa setae. Mesonotum transversely reticulate, lateral setae capitate. Metanotum without sculpture medially ( +Fig. 34 +), major setae acute. Fore tarsal tooth shorter than 0.5 of tarsal width. Fore wing lobe with two capitate setae. Prosternal ferna almost meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to three small sclerites. +Pelta +sub-quadrate and reticulate ( +Fig. 34 +); tergites III–VII with no sculpture medially, with 2 pairs of small straight wing-retaining setae, lateral major setae long and capitate; setae S1 and S2 on IX long and capitate. + + +Measurements +( +holotype +female microptera in microns). Body length 1710. Head, length 185; width 160; po setae 55; longest cheek seta 10. Pronotum, length 130; width 230; major setae—am 27, aa 55, ml 50, epim 55, pa 45. Mesonotal lateral seta 35. Fore wing lobe 50. Tergite IX setae +S1 80 +, +S2 75 +. Tube length 110. Antennal segments III–VIII length 52, 50, 52, 45, 45, 33. + + + + + +Material studied +. +Holotype +female microptera, + +Queensland + +, +Brisbane +, + +Buhot Creek +Reserve + +, from barkspray, + +27.vi.2011 + +(Monteith & Turco; DJT 1297). + + + + +Paratypes +: + +Queensland + +, one female taken with +holotype +; West of +Cooktown +, +Melody Rocks +, +2 females +from barkspray in rainforest, + +9.xi.2014 + + +; + +Brisbane +, +Mt. Glorious +, +1 female +from dead branch, + +19.i.2006 + + +; + +Lamington +, +O’Reillys +, +1 female +from dead leaves, + +9.x.2006 + + +. + + + + +Comments. +Although known only from six females, the pale colour of their abdominal tergites is distinctive, and the sculpture on the +pelta +is almost uniformly reticulate. The pronotal anteromarginal setae are minute in the last two listed +paratypes +, but are longer in the other four specimens and varying from blunt to capitate. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F2FFFBC37C9FDDCD49BF9AF.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F2FFFBC37C9FDDCD49BF9AF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2b8d2f69bdd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F2FFFBC37C9FDDCD49BF9AF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips retis + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 12 +, +30 +, +35 +) + + + + +Male macroptera +: Body and legs dark brown with red internal pigment, but fore tarsi paler; antennal segment III brownish-yellow with apex darker, IV–VI pale in basal third; major setae pale except po and pronotal aa, ml and pa that are dark; fore wing weakly shaded. + + +Antennal segment VIII broad at base, IV–VII with narrow pedicel ( +Fig. 30 +); III and IV each with two sense cones. Head longer than wide, cheeks with weak setae; vertex reticulate, po setae scarcely reaching posterior margin of eyes; maxillary stylets retracted to just anterior to po setae, less than one-fifth of head width apart ( +Fig. 12 +). Pronotum transverse, surface very weakly reticulate; major setae all small. Mesonotum transversely reticulate, lateral setal pair small. Metanotum reticulate ( +Fig. 35 +), major setal pair pointed. Fore tarsal tooth length about 0.5 of tarsal width; apex of fore tibia with no tubercle. Fore wing broad, narrowing to apex, with about 10 duplicated cilia, sub-basal setae short. Prosternal ferna almost meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to 3 sclerites. +Pelta +reticulate ( +Fig. 35 +); tergites reticulate, II–VII with 2 pairs of sigmoid setae, lateral major setae weakly capitate; tergite IX setae S1 with apex blunt, S2 short and blunt. Sternite VIII with narrow transverse pore plate extending fully across sternite to lateral margins. + + +Measurements +( +holotype +male macroptera in microns). Body length 2050. Head, length 210; width 195; po setae 25; longest cheek seta 10. Pronotum, length 150; width 280; major setae—am 5, aa 20, ml 20, epim 45, pa 30. Mesonotal lateral seta 10. Fore wing length 730. Tergite IX setae S1 120, +S2 35 +. Sternite VIII pore plate dimensions 130 +x 10. +Tube length 180. Antennal segments III–VIII length 55, 50, 55, 50, 50, 25. + + +Male microptera +: very similar in structure to macroptera, but metathorax broader; fore wing shorter than thorax width, with three sub-basal setae. + + +Female microptera +: similar in structure to male microptera, tergite IX setae S1 and S2 long with apices blunt. + + + + + + +Material +studied + +. +Holotype +male macroptera, + +South Australia + +, +20km +north of +Meningie +, from a lichen, + +Xanthoria parietina + +, + +15.i.2002 + +( + +LAM +4101 + +/2). + + +Paratypes: 1 female, 3 male micropterae collected with holotype. + + + +Comments. +This species is possibly not closely related to the other species of + +Deplorothrips + +. It is one of two species placed in this genus that have the stylets deeply retracted and only one third of the head width apart. In contrast to the second species, + +deuae + +, the available specimens are not sufficiently cleared to measure the length of the maxillary pillars, but they seem to be about 70 microns long, with long maxillary levers. It is the only species considered here that has the postocular setae and three of the pronotal major setal pairs dark in colour, the fore wing is shaded and bears 10 duplicated cilia, and the postocular setae are unusually short. In general appearance it is similar to + +Trichothrips connexus +Hood + +, from +Australia +, a species that lacks duplicated cilia on the fore wings and is currently listed under + +Hoplothrips + +. However, neither + +connexus + +nor + +retis + +can be considered as closely related to +corticis +DeGeer, the +type +species of + +Hoplothrips + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F2FFFBF37C9FAF1D7F5F8D9.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F2FFFBF37C9FAF1D7F5F8D9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3b6e836a554 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F2FFFBF37C9FAF1D7F5F8D9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,299 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips villosus + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 1 +, +17 +, +32 +, +36, 44 +) + + + + +Female aptera +: Body and femora brown, tube darkest, all tibiae and tarsi yellow, antennal segment III yellow in basal half, IV in basal third, V only at base, remaining segments brown. + + +Antennal segment VIII constricted at base ( +Fig. 32 +), III and IV each with 3 sense cones but ventrolateral one smaller than other two. Head slightly longer than wide, without ocelli, reticulate at least on posterior half ( +Fig. 1 +); cheeks with 2 or 3 small stout setae; po setae long and capitate; mouth cone pointed; maxillary pillars less than 30 microns long with the levers also very short, maxillary stylets not retracted anterior to occipital ridge, mandible small. Pronotum transverse, weakly reticulate around margins, notopleural sutures not always fully complete, all 5 pairs of major setae capitate, but am setae short. Mesonotum transversely reticulate, lateral setal pair capitate; wing lobe minute, sometimes with one capitate seta. Metanotum transverse, finely reticulate, major setal pair capitate, 6 to 10 minor setae scattered anteromedially ( +Fig. 1 +). Fore tarsus with tooth. Prosternal ferna almost meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to 3 sclerites. +Pelta +broadly rounded, reticulate; tergites with 2 pairs of small straight wing-retaining setae; setae S1 and S2 on IX capitate. + + +Measurements +( +holotype +female aptera in microns). Body length 1930. Head, length 190; width 160; po setae 50; longest cheek seta 15. Pronotum, length 150; width 230; major setae—am 20, aa 35, ml 40, epim 45, pa 40. Mesonotal lateral seta 30. Fore wing lobe 5. Tergite IX setae +S1 60 +, +S2 60 +. Tube length 120. Antennal segments III–VIII length 57, 55, 53, 45, 40, 30. + + +Male aptera +: Small male—similar to female, but sense cones on antennal segments III and IV variable from 2 to 3; pronotal am setae no larger than discal setae; tergite IX setae S2 short and stout; sternite VIII with broad pore plate ( +Fig. 44 +). Large male—with head bearing 6 or more stout cheek setae ( +Fig. 17 +); small tubercle present ventrally between eyes; pronotum almost as long as wide, aa and ml setae elongate, pa setae small and pointed; metanotum elevated medially into broadly rounded tubercle ( +Fig. 36 +); fore femora and fore tarsal tooth large, fore tibia inner apex thickened but not produced into a tubercle; sternites II–VI with paired transverse rows of specialised reticulation, VIII with broad pore plate ( +Fig. 44 +). + + +Measurements +( +paratype +large male aptera in microns). Body length 2100. Head, length 240; width 160; po setae 75; longest cheek seta 20. Pronotum, length 270; width 300; major setae—am 5, aa 100, ml 100, epim 70, pa 20. Mesonotal lateral seta 20. Fore wing lobe 10. Tergite IX setae +S1 75 +, +S2 35 +. Sternite VIII pore plate dimensions 110 +x 30. +Tube length 130. Antennal segments III–VIII length 65, 70, 65, 60, 45, 35. + + +Female macroptera +: Similar to female aptera, but ocelli present, antennal segment IV with 4 large sense cones, metanotum more elongate; fore wing with 2 capitate sub-basal setae and 12 duplicated cilia, tergites II–VII each with 2 pairs of sigmoid wing-retaining setae. + + +Male macroptera +: Similar to male aptera, but ocelli present, antennal segment IV with 4 large sense cones, pronotal am setae no larger than discal setae, metanotum more elongate; fore wing with 2 capitate sub-basal setae and 12 duplicated cilia, tergites II–VII each with 2 pairs of sigmoid wing-retaining setae. + + + + + + +Material +studied + +. +Holotype +female aptera, + +South Australia + +, + +40km +SE of Mt Gambier + +, from + +Eucalyptus obliqua + +nuts, + +12.iii.2011 + +( + +LAM +5465 + +). + + + + +Paratypes +(all apterae except as noted): + +South Australia + +, +6 females +, +6 males + +; 1 female, 1 male macropterae taken with holotype. + + +Norfolk Island + +, +Palm Grove +track, +6 females +, +1 male +from dead twigs, + +22.xii.2012 + + +. + + +Queensland + +, +Brisbane +, +Mt Glorious +, from dead leaves and branches, +1 female +, +2 males +, +1female +, +1 male +macropterae, + +22.iii.2007 + + +; + +Lamington +, +O’Reilly’s +, +1 male +, +1 female +macroptera, + +i.2008 + + +; from dead wood, 1 female, +7.viii.2013 +, 1 female, +13.iii.2007 +; + +Cape Tribulation +, +1 female +from dead leaves, + +7.x.2012 + + +. + + +Tasmania + +, +Huon Valley +, +1 male +macroptera, + +29.v.2001 + + +. + + +Western Australia + +, +40km +N of +Albany +, fogging + +Eucalyptus + +tree, +2 females +, +1 male +, + +v.2001 + + +. + + + + +Comments. +This species differs from other members of the genus as follows: maxillary pillars exceptionally short and stylets not extending anterior to the occipital ridge, antennal segment VIII weakly constricted at base, metanotum with small discal setae antero-medially, and male sternite VIII with broad pore plate ( +Fig. 44 +). However, as discussed above, each of these character states varies amongst the Australian species considered here. The number of sense cones on the fourth antennal segments varies between apterae and macropterae, and the largest males have the metanotum elevated into a crest although their fore tibiae do not have a tubercle at the inner apex. The specimens from + +Norfolk +Island + +, also one female from +Queensland +, Lamington, have the tibiae with brown shading medially. Three females from Brisbane, Mt Glorious, have been studied with the metanotum similar to + +villosus + +, but with the hind tibiae uniformly brown, and the maxillary stylets retracted into the head at least half way to the post ocular setae. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F30FFA237C9F854D777FE9D.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F30FFA237C9F854D777FE9D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fffa93966ad --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F30FFA237C9F854D777FE9D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips mongai + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 16 +, +26 +, +43 +) + + + + +Male microptera +: Body and all femora brown, tibiae light brown with tarsi paler, hind tibiae paler on inner distal third; antennal segments light brown, III paler in basal half. + + +Antennal segment VIII broad at base but slightly narrower than apex of VII ( +Fig. 26 +); IV–VII with narrow pedicel; III and IV each with two sense cones. Head longer than wide ( +Fig. 16 +), ocelli absent, cheeks with weak setae; vertex with little or no sculpture except near posterior margin; po setae long and capitate; maxillary pillars scarcely 30 microns long with the levers short and sharply curved mesad and dorsally, stylets wide apart, retracted scarcely one third of distance to level of po setae. Pronotum with strong median longitudinal apodeme, without sculpture; am setae minute, remaining setae capitate. Mesonotum almost without sculpture, lateral setal pair minute, wing lobe small with one or two small setae that are sometimes capitate. Metanotum without sculpture, median setal pair slender and acute. Fore femora stout, fore tarsal tooth almost as long as tarsal width, fore tibia with subapical tubercle. Prosternal ferna almost meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to two small sclerites. +Pelta +eroded, wider than long, weakly sculptured; tergites with no sculpture, II–VII with 2 pairs of very small, straight wing-retaining setae, lateral major setae capitate; tergite IX setae S1 weakly capitate, S2 short and pointed. Sternites IV–VI with faint areas of reticulation anterolaterally, VIII with transverse pore plate ( +Fig. 43 +). + + +Measurements +( +holotype +male in microns). Body length 1230. Head, length 150; width 130; po setae 40; longest cheek seta 12. Pronotum, length 140; width 175; major setae—am 5, aa 35, ml 35, epim 35, pa 35. Fore wing length 18. Tergite IX setae +S1 35 +, +S2 25 +. Sternite VIII pore plate dimensions +75 x 15. +Tube length 85. Antennal segments III–VIII length 43, 40, 45, 38, 35, 25. + + +Female microptera +: Similar to male apart from secondary sexual characters; slightly larger, with fore tarsal tooth smaller. + + + + + + +Material +studied + +. +Holotype +male microptera, + + +New +South Wales + + +, +Monga Forest +, from dead branch, + +24.i.2013 + +( + +LAM +5733 + +). + + +Paratypes: 5 males, 16 females taken with holotype. + + + +Comments. +This species is closely similar to + +chydaeus + +, but has shorter antennae and sternite VIII of the male has a transversely elongate pore plate. Although described here as micropterous, the specimens have the wing lobe scarcely 20 microns long. A sample of both sexes from + +Eucalyptus + +dead branches and nuts, +Tasmania +, 17 Mile Plain, is closely similar to the +type +series, but has the wing lobe up to 35 microns long, and the tube and tergite IX setae also longer. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F31FFA237C9FDDCD545F8DF.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F31FFA237C9FDDCD545F8DF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9f347067cb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F31FFA237C9FDDCD545F8DF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips norfuki + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 7 +, +27 +, +37 +) + + + + +Male aptera +: Body and all femora brown, mid and hind tibiae yellowish brown with apex pale, tarsi yellow; antennal segment I brown, II paler at apex, III variably yellow toward base but variably light brown toward apex, IV–VIII dark brown. + + +Antennal segment VIII slightly narrower at base than VII at apex, IV–VII sharply narrowed to pedicel ( +Fig. 27 +); III and IV each with two large sense cones. Head longer than wide, posterior ocelli weakly developed, cheeks with weak setae; vertex with sculpture near posterior margin; po setae long and capitate; maxillary stylets wide apart, retracted anterior to occipital ridge ( +Fig. 7 +). Pronotum with median longitudinal apodeme, without sculpture; am setae minute, remaining setae capitate with ml setae shortest. Mesonotum with transverse sculpture, lateral setal pair short but capitate, wing lobe minute. Metanotum without sculpture medially but with weak longitudinal ridges on posterior third ( +Fig. 37 +), median setal pair slender and acute. Fore femora and fore tarsal tooth stout, fore tibia with small subapical tubercle. Prosternal ferna almost meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to three small sclerites, mesoeusternal anterior margin narrow and convex. +Pelta +hat-shaped, weakly sculptured; tergites with no sculpture, II–VII with 2 pairs of very small, straight wing-retaining setae, lateral major setae weakly capitate but lateral pair on IV–VII acute; tergite IX setae S1 long and capitate, S2 short and pointed. Sternites II–VI with transverse rows of reticulation anterolaterally; VIII with small, almost circular, pore plate. + + +Measurements +( +holotype +male in microns). Body length 1720. Head, length 170; width 145; po setae 60; longest cheek seta 12. Pronotum, length 170; width 235; major setae—am 5, aa 60, ml 25, epim 50, pa 45. Fore wing lobe 7. Tergite IX setae +S1 65 +, +S2 30 +. Sternite VIII pore plate dimensions +20 x 16. +Tube length 100. Antennal segments III–VIII length 50, 45, 50, 40, 40, 30. + + +Female aptera +: similar to male but larger, fore tarsal tooth smaller and more pointed; pronotal am setae weakly capitate; metanotum without longitudinal ridges on posterior half; tergite IX setae S2 long and softly pointed. + + +Measurements +( +paratype +female aptera in microns). Body length 1730. Head, length 170; width 155. Pronotum, length 130; width 210; major setae—am 27/15, aa 35, ml 35, epim 50, pa 45. Tergite IX setae +S1 85 +, +S2 85 +. Tube length 100. + + +Female macroptera +: similar to female aptera, ocelli well developed, tergites with two pairs of sigmoid setae; fore wing with 2 capitate sub-basal setae and 5 duplicated cilia. + + + + + + +Material +studied + +. +Holotype +male aptera, + +Australia + +, + +Norfolk +Island + +, +Palm +grove +Track +, from old dead branch, + +23.xii.2012 + +( + +LAM +5703 + +). + + + + +Paratypes +(apterae except as indicated): + +Norfolk Island + +, +1 male + +, + +2 females +taken with +holotype +; same locality + +, + +2 males +from + +Cordyline + +leaf litter, + +21.x.2013 + +, same locality + +, 2 males from dead branches, +30.xi.2014 +; + +Prince Philip Drive +, +2 males +2 females +from + +Toona + +dead branch, + +25.xii.2012 + + +; + +Bird Rock Track +, +1 male +from dead branch, + +22.xi.2014 + + +; + +Mission Road Forest +, +1 female +macroptera from dead branches, + +27.iii.2014 + + +. + + + + +Comments. +Although similar to + +chydaeus + +, this species from + +Norfolk +Island + +has the maxillary stylets slightly less retracted into the head. The females have capitate pronotal anteromarginal setae, and the males have sternite VIII with a smaller, almost circular, pore plate. Two female macropterae have been studied from coastal + +New + +South +Wales + + +(Broulee and Nowra) that possibly also represent + +norfuki + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F31FFBD37C9FB1ED29FFBA0.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F31FFBD37C9FB1ED29FFBA0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cc653c0ce15 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F31FFBD37C9FB1ED29FFBA0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips paspalus + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 3 +, +28 +) + + + + +Female microptera +: Antennal segments III–VI yellow in basal half but each with apex brown ( +Fig. 28 +); body and antennal segments I–II and VII–VIII light brown, tube darkest; femora light brown, with apices yellow; tibiae yellow but washed with very faint light brown, tarsi yellow. + + +Antennal segment VIII very broad at base, IV–VII with narrow pedicel ( +Fig. 28 +); III with three sense cones, IV with four. Head slightly longer than wide, ocelli absent, cheeks with weak setae; vertex without sculpture except near posterior margin; po setae long and pointed; maxillary pillars about 40 microns long with the levers scarcely 30 microns, stylets wide apart, retracted to just anterior to occipital ridge ( +Fig. 3 +). Pronotum transverse, without sculpture except at posterior margin; am setae minute, epim weakly capitate, remaining setae pointed. Mesonotum transversely reticulate, lateral setal pair minute. Wing lobe small with one seta. Metanotum almost without sculpture, major setal pair small and acute ( +Fig. 3 +). Fore tarsal tooth length less than 0.5 of tarsal width. Prosternal ferna not meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to two very small sclerites. +Pelta +small, broadly D-shaped, anterior margin eroded; tergites with no sculpture, II–VII with 2 pairs of small straight wing-retaining setae; both pairs of lateral major setae long and acute; tergite VIII setae S1 and S2, also setae S1 on IX weakly capitate, S2 on IX shorter and pointed. + + +Measurements +( +holotype +female microptera in microns). Body length 1600. Head, length 170; width 145; po setae 65; longest cheek seta 10. Pronotum, length 135; width 210; major setae—am 5, aa 35, ml 45, epim 50, pa 55. Fore wing lobe 35. Tergite IX setae +S1 70 +, +S2 40 +. Tube length 95. Antennal segments III–VIII length 45, 45, 45, 43, 40, 25. + + +Female macroptera +: Similar to microptera, but ocelli present; mesonotal lateral setae acute, 15 microns long; metanotum without sculpture anteromedially but reticulate on posterior half; fore wing sub-basal setae blunt to pointed, 4–6 duplicated cilia; tergal wing-retaining setae sigmoid. + + + + + + +Material +studied + +. +Holotype +female microptera, + +Australia + +, + +Norfolk +Island + +, +Mission Road Forest +, from dead branches, + +27.iii.2014 + +( + +LAM +5954 + +). + + + + +Paratype +: + +Norfolk Island + +, +Palm Glen +, +1 female +macroptera from dead + +Citrus + +, + +24.iii.2014 + +. + + + + + +Comments. +Known only from two specimens taken at widely separated sites on + +Norfolk +Island + +this species is typical of the genus in having antennal segment VIII broadly joined to VII, and the maxillary stylets scarcely retracted anterior to the occipital ridge. However, it is unique in the genus for the pale colour of the antennae, including segment VI, and is also unusual in having most of the major setae with acute, not capitate, apices, and setae S2 on tergite IX of females unusually short and more like S2 setae of males in this genus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F32FFA137C9FD94D363F86A.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F32FFA137C9FD94D363F86A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..08510be7883 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F32FFA137C9FD94D363F86A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,288 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips howei + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 10 +, +23 +, +33, 41, 45 +) + + + + +Male microptera +: Body and all femora brown, all tibiae and tarsi yellow; antennal segment I brown, II paler at apex, III yellow but weakly shaded at apex, IV with yellow pedicel, V–VIII light brown. + + +Antennal segment VIII slightly narrower at base than VII at apex ( +Fig. 23 +), IV–VII with distinct pedicel; III with 2 (rarely 3) sense cones, IV with 2 or 3 sense cones (left and right antennae of +holotype +differ). Head scarcely longer than wide ( +Fig. 10 +), ocelli absent, cheeks with several weak setae; vertex without sculpture except at posterior margin; po setae long and capitate; maxillary pillars about 45 microns long and the levers about 35 microns, stylets wide apart, retracted into head half-way to level of po setae, with weak maxillary bridge. Pronotum transverse with weak median longitudinal apodeme, without sculpture except at posterior margin; am setae minute, remaining setae capitate. Mesonotum with weak transverse reticulation, lateral setal pair minute. Metanotum without sculpture, median setal pair acute. Fore tarsal tooth as long as tarsal width, fore tibia with stout subapical tubercle ( +Fig. 45 +). Wing lobe present, with or without one small capitate seta. Prosternal ferna meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to three small sclerites. +Pelta +D-shaped, weakly sculptured; tergites with no sculpture, II– VII with 2 pairs of very small straight wing-retaining setae, lateral major setae long and capitate; tergite IX setae S1 capitate, S2 short and pointed. Sternites III–V with faint areas of reticulation anterolaterally, VIII with transverse pore plate ( +Fig. 41 +). Large males with cheek setae stouter and more numerous, fore femora considerably enlarged, metanotum with a longitudinally sculptured area posterior to a triangular area with no sculpture ( +Fig. 33 +), mesoeusternal anterior margin narrow and angulate. + + +Measurements +( +holotype +male in microns). Body length 1400. Head, length 155; width 145; po setae 70; longest cheek seta 12. Pronotum, length 110; width 190; major setae—am 5, aa 40, ml 35, epim 45, pa 45. Fore wing length 40. Tergite IX setae +S1 70 +, +S2 35 +. Sternite VIII pore plate dimensions +50 x 7. +Tube length 90. Antennal segments III–VIII length 45, 43, 45, 40, 35, 25. + + +Female microptera +: similar to male, fore tarsal tooth slender; tergite IX setae S2 long and pointed. + + +Female macroptera +: essentially similar to microptera, except antennal segments III and IV each with three sense cones, fore wings with two capitate sub-basal setae and six duplicated cilia, tergites with two pairs of sigmoid wing-retaining setae. + + + + + + +Material +studied + +. +Holotype +male microptera, +Lord Howe Island +, +Intermediate Hill +, from dead branches, + +26.xii.2011 + +( + +LAM +5545 + +). + + + + +Paratypes +(micropterae except as noted): +Lord Howe Island +, +1 female +macroptera, +1 female +, +2 males +taken with +holotype + +; + +Soldiers Creek +, +9 females +, +4 males +, from dead twigs, + +21–24.xi.1996 + + +; + +Rocky Run +, +2 males +from dead branch, + +24.xii.2007 + +, +1 male +from + +Malesia + +, + +23.xii.2007 + + +; + +Stevens Trail +, +1 female +macroptera, +3 females +, +1 male +, + +26.xii.2001 + + +; + +Settlement Beach +, +2 female +macropterae, + +22.xii.2001 + + +. + + + +New +South Wales + + +, +Nowra +, +2 females +, +2 males +from dead twigs, + +14.iv.2001 + + +; + +Narooma +, +1 male +from dead + +Eucalyptus + +leaves, + +28.xii.2010 + + +; + +Crystal Creek +, +1 male +from dead leaves, + +23.xii.2006 + + +. + + + + +Comments. +The stylets of this species, and also of + +minaei + +, are intermediate in position between the low, wideapart, V-shaped condition of previously described members of + +Deplorothrips + +and the deeply retracted condition described here in + +capitalis + +, + +chydaeus + +and + +retis + +. Despite this, + +howei + +shares most character states with other members of the genus, including antennal segment VIII broad at the base, and in males the presence of a tubercle at the inner apex of the fore tibiae, and a small, transverse pore plate on sternite VIII. This pore plate is broken into two, or even three, segments in a few males, a condition also reported in + +Deplorothrips bassus + +from +New Zealand +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F33FFA037C9FCDFD332F9DA.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F33FFA037C9FCDFD332F9DA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..06d21fdeb19 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F33FFA037C9FCDFD332F9DA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips makrus + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 6 +, +14, 19 +, +24 +, +42 +) + + + + +Male aptera +: Body and all femora brown, all tibiae and tarsi yellow; antennal segment I brown, II paler at apex, III yellow, IV–V yellow in at least basal third, VI–VIII light brown. + + +Antennal segment VIII with base broad and scarcely narrower than apex of VII ( +Fig. 24 +); IV–VII with narrow pedicel; III and IV each with two sense cones. Head longer than wide ( +Fig. 6 +), ocelli absent, cheeks with weak setae; vertex with little or no sculpture except near posterior margin; po setae long and capitate; maxillary pillars about 50 microns long with the levers curving dorsally and apparently scarcely 30 microns long, stylets wide apart, retracted anterior to occipital ridge. Pronotum relatively long with strong median longitudinal apodeme, without sculpture except at posterior margin; am setae minute, remaining setae capitate. Mesonotum with weak transverse lines, lateral setal pair minute. Metanotum almost without sculpture, median setal pair minute. Fore femora massive, fore tarsal tooth almost as long as tarsal width, fore tibia with pale but stout subapical tubercle. Wing lobe scarcely 5 microns across, with or without one small capitate seta. Prosternal ferna well separated medially ( +Fig. 19 +), mesopraesternum eroded to two very small sclerites, mesoeusternal anterior margin transverse. +Pelta +eroded, broadly hat-shaped; tergites with no sculpture, II–VII with 2 pairs of very small straight wing-retaining setae, lateral major setae long and capitate; tergite IX setae S1 weakly capitate, S2 shorter and blunt. Sternites III–V with faint areas of reticulation anterolaterally, VIII with circular pore plate ( +Fig. 42 +). + + +Measurements +( +holotype +male in microns). Body length 1430. Head, length 175; width 125; po setae 50; longest cheek seta 12. Pronotum, length 180; width 200; major setae—am 5, aa 45, ml 40, epim 50, pa 50. Fore wing length 10. Tergite IX setae +S1 60 +, +S2 30 +. Sternite VIII pore plate dimensions +30 x 20. +Tube length 100. Antennal segments III–VIII length 48, 48, 50, 40, 35, 30. + + +Female aptera +: Similar to male, but head less elongate and pronotum more transverse, fore legs more slender with small tarsal tooth; tergite IX setae S1 and S2 long and capitate. + + +Female macroptera +: Similar to female aptera, but antennal segment IV with 3 sense cones and segment III with 2 or 3 sense cones; fore wing pale, weakly narrower medially, with 4 duplicated cilia and 2 capitate sub-basal setae; +pelta +sub-quadrate; tergites each with 2 pairs of sigmoid wing-retaining setae + + + + + + +Material +studied + +. +Holotype +male aptera, +Lord Howe Island +, +Kim’s Lookout +, from dead wood with lichens, + +22.xii.2001 + +( + +LAM +4079 + +). + + + + +Paratypes +: +Lord Howe Island +, +1 female +macroptera, taken with +holotype +; +Stevens Trail +, +1 female +, +1 male +apterae from dead branches, + +26.xii.2001 + + +. + + +Queensland + +, +Lamington +, +O’Reilly’s +, +2 female +apterae, +1 female +macroptera from dead branches, + +11.x.2006 + + +. + + + + +Comments. +Although the +holotype +is considered apterous, it bears a minute wing lobe. It is a large male with expanded fore femora and a large pale tubercle on the tibiae. However, the head has relatively weak cheek setae, but the mouth cone is exceptionally long and pointed, extending between the fore coxae ( +Fig. 19 +), although the stylets are not deeply retracted into the head due to the curvature of the maxillary levers. Antennal segment VIII is very weakly constricted at the base ( +Fig. 24 +), and the male has a small almost circular pore plate on sternite VIII ( +Fig. 42 +). One macropterous female from +New Zealand +of the + +bassus + +-complex has been studied that is similar to the + +makrus + +macropterae but has a shorter mouth cone and most or the major setae with pointed apices. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F33FFA337C9FA12D428FC15.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F33FFA337C9FA12D428FC15.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bdea45002e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F33FFA337C9FA12D428FC15.xml @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips minaei + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 11 +, +15 +, +25 +) + + + + +Male aptera +: Body and all femora brown, mid and hind tibiae light brown with tarsi paler; fore tibiae and tarsi brownish-yellow; antennal segments light brown, III paler in basal half. + + +Antennal segment VIII broad at base, IV–VII narrowed evenly to pedicel ( +Fig. 25 +); III with one sense cone, IV with two. Head longer than wide ( +Fig. 15 +), ocelli absent, cheeks with weak setae; vertex with little or no sculpture except near posterior margin; po setae long and weakly capitate; maxillary pillars about 55 microns long with the levers curving dorsally and apparently about 40 microns long, stylets retracted almost to po setae, about one third of head width apart with distinct maxillary bridge. Pronotum with strong median longitudinal apodeme, without sculpture; am setae minute, remaining setae weakly capitate. Mesonotum with weak transverse lines, lateral setal pair minute, no wing lobe. Metanotum without sculpture, median setal pair slender and acute. Fore femora stout, fore tarsal tooth almost as long as tarsal width, fore tibia with small subapical tubercle ( +Fig. 15 +). Prosternal ferna almost meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to two small sclerites. +Pelta +eroded, broadly hat-shaped; tergites with no sculpture, II–VII with 2 pairs of very small, straight wing-retaining setae; lateral major setae long and softly pointed but acute on posterior segments; tergite IX setae S1 long and acute, S2 short and pointed. Sternites III–V with faint areas of reticulation anterolaterally, VIII with broadly oval pore plate. + + +Measurements +( +holotype +male in microns). Body length 1470. Head, length 185; width 145; po setae 65; longest cheek seta 15. Pronotum, length 140; width 210; major setae—am 5, aa 60, ml 50, epim 55, pa 50. Tergite IX setae S1 115, +S2 25 +. Sternite VIII pore plate dimensions +45 x 15. +Tube length 90. Antennal segments III–VIII length 45, 48, 50, 48, 45, 25. + + +Female aptera +: similar in structure and colour to male ( +Fig. 11 +); fore tarsal tooth shorter, less than half tarsal width; fore tibia with no tubercle; pronotal setae more obviously capitate than in male, +pelta +more broadly rounded. + + + + + +Material studied +. +Holotype +male aptera, + + +Australian +Capital Territory + + +, +Black Mt. +, from dead branch, + +2.v.2006 + +(KM 37). + + + +Paratypes: 4 females taken with holotype; + +same locality, +1 female +from + +Melaleuca + +, + +13.iv.2003 + +. + + + + + +Comments. +Presumably related to + +capitalis + +, this species is remarkable within + +Deplorothrips + +for the absence of a sense cone on the inner apex of antennal segment III in both sexes. The maxillary stylets are deeply retracted into the head into a position very similar to that found in + +howei + +, but the maxillary levers are longer and curve dorsally However, it is distinguished by the long pointed setae on tergite IX, the small oval pore plate on sternite VIII of the male, and the pale brown colour of the hind tibiae and antennal segment III. The +holotype +is presumably a major male, and smaller males of this species can be expected to have a less robust pronotum. Only one other specimen of + +Deplorothrips + +has been studied with setae S1 acute on tergite IX, but this female from southern +Victoria +has these setae much shorter than the tube. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F34FFA637C9FF57D311FE55.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F34FFA637C9FF57D311FE55.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ea4cccd48a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F34FFA637C9FF57D311FE55.xml @@ -0,0 +1,258 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips deuae + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 13 +, +18 +, +22 +, +39 +) + + + + +Male aptera +: Body and all femora brown, tibiae and tarsi light yellowish-brown; antennal segments I–II light brown, III variably yellowish brown, IV–VIII darker brown. + + +Antennal segment VIII broadly joined to VII ( +Fig. 22 +), IV–VII narrowed to pedicel; III and IV each with two sense cones. Head longer than wide ( +Fig. 13 +), ocelli absent, cheeks with weak setae; vertex with little or no sculpture except near posterior margin; po setae long and weakly capitate; maxillary pillars about 70 microns long with the levers curving mesad, stylets retracted almost to po setae, subparallel medially and about one third of head width apart with faint maxillary bridge. Pronotum with strong median longitudinal apodeme, without sculpture; am setae minute, remaining setae capitate. Mesonotum with weak transverse lines, lateral setal pair minute, no wing lobe. Metanotum without sculpture, median setal pair slender and acute. Fore femora stout, fore tarsal tooth as long as tarsal width, fore tibia with small subapical tubercle. Prosternal ferna not meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to two small sclerites ( +Fig. 18 +). +Pelta +eroded, broadly hat-shaped, weakly reticulate; tergites with no sculpture, II–VII with 2 pairs of very small, straight wing-retaining setae, lateral major setae weakly capitate; tergite IX setae S1 long and capitate, S2 short and pointed. Sternites III–VI with transverse rows of reticulation anterolaterally, VIII with oval pore plate ( +Fig. 39 +). + + +Measurements +( +holotype +male aptera in microns). Body length 1400. Head, length 175; width 150; po setae 60. Pronotum, length 150; width 210; major setae—am 5, aa 50, ml 25, epim 43, pa 43. Tergite IX setae +S1 70 +, +S2 30 +. Sternite VIII pore plate dimensions +40 x 12. +Tube length 90. Antennal segments III–VIII length 47, 45, 50, 47, 40, 30. + + +Female aptera +: similar to male but slightly larger, fore tarsal tooth small, pronotum without median longitudinal apodeme ( +Fig. 13 +), +pelta +broadly D-shaped. + + +Female macroptera +: similar to female aptera, antennal segments III and IV each with two sense cones; fore wing with two small sub-basal setae but no duplicated cilia; tergite IX setae S1more than 0.75 as long as tube. + + + + + + +Material +studied + +. +Holotype +male aptera, + + +New +South Wales + + +, +Batemans Bay +, from dead + +Casuarina + +with lichen, + +26.x.1985 + +( + +LAM +1932 + +). + + + + +Paratypes +(apterae except where indicated): + + +New +South Wales + + +, +8 females +, +2 males +taken with +holotype +; +Yamba +, +2 males +from dead wood, + +23.xi.2012 + + +; + +Mossy Point +, +1 female +macroptera from dead wood, + +15.ix.2012 + + +. + + + +Australian +Capital Territory + + +, +Namadji +, +1 female +, +4 males +from dead twigs, + +29.viii.2005 + + +; same site, 1 male, +18.xii.2005 +; same site, 1 female macroptera, 2 males from dead twigs with lichen, +27.xii.2005 +. + + + + + +Comments. +The stylets are more deeply retracted into the head than in any other member of this genus, and there is a distinct maxillary bridge. However, the other characters are shared with species of + +Deplorothrips + +, indicating that + +deuae + +is a member of the same lineage and should thus not be segregated to a separate genus. The +type +series comprises apterae and two macropterae, whereas the +types +of + +capitalis + +comprise micropterae and macropterae. +These +two species are similar to each other, and there is a possibility that the differences between them are due to the differences in wing morph. +Moreover +, + +deuae + +is particularly similar in structure to + +minaei + +, although that has long pointed major setae. +One +female and one male micropterae, together with one female macroptera have been studied from +Tasmania +, Mt + +. + +Wellington, that cannot be securely identified because the stylets are disrupted. One male and two female apterae have been studied from +South Australia +, Meningie, that have stylets as deeply retracted as + +deuae + +, but have the mid and hind legs and antennal segment III dark brown. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F35FFA137C9FD94D781FE5A.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F35FFA137C9FD94D781FE5A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d4d0811408d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F35FFA137C9FD94D781FE5A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,308 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips diaphorus + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 2 +, +20 +, +40, 47 +) + + + + +Female microptera +: Body and femora brown, but tergites VII–VIII pale medially; tibiae and tarsi yellow; antennal segment I brown, II paler at apex, III–V yellow, VI brownish yellow, VII–VIII brown. + + +Antennal segment VIII constricted to base, lanceolate ( +Fig. 20 +); III and IV each with three sense cones; V with 4 sensory hairs ( +sensilla trichodea +) ventrally on distal half. Head longer than wide ( +Fig. 2 +), ocelli absent, cheeks with two pairs of short setae; vertex weakly sculptured; po setae long and capitate; mouth cone long and pointed, extending between fore coxae; maxillary pillars scarcely 50 microns long with the levers less than 40 microns, stylets wide apart, retracted to just anterior to occipital ridge. Pronotum transverse, without sculpture except at posterior margin; notopleural sutures usually complete but sometimes weakly incomplete; am setae small, remaining setae long and capitate. Mesonotum with weak transverse reticulation, lateral setal pair capitate. Metanotum almost without sculpture, major setal pair acute. Fore tarsal tooth length 0.5 of tarsal width. Wing lobe small with two capitate setae. Prosternal ferna not meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to three small sclerites. +Pelta +broadly hat-shaped; tergites weakly sculptured, II–VII with 2 pairs of small straight wing-retaining setae, lateral major setae long and capitate; lateral setae on tergite VIII, also setae S1 on IX capitate, S2 on IX bluntly pointed. + + +Measurements +( +holotype +female in microns). Body length 2200. Head, length 210; width 200; po setae 85; longest cheek seta 15. Pronotum, length 190; width 310; major setae—am 15, aa 70, ml 80, epim 83, pa 85. Mesonotal lateral setae 35. Fore wing length 70. Tergite IX setae +S1 95 +, +S2 90 +. Tube length 135. Antennal segments III–VIII length 65, 55, 57, 50, 50, 45. + + +Male microptera +: Essentially similar to female, but antennal segment V brown on apical half; large males with more prominent cheek setae, more robust prothorax and fore legs, and larger fore tarsal tooth; inner apex of fore tibiae thickened but without a tubercle; sternites III–VII anterolaterally usually with narrow transverse band of reticulation ( +Fig. 47 +); sternite VIII with small circular to weakly oval pore plate medially, +23 x 17 +microns ( +Fig. 40 +). + + +Measurements +(large +paratype +male in microns). Body length 1680. Head, length 200; width 165. Pronotum, length 200; width 300. Tube length 135. + + +Macropterae +(both sexes): Similar to micropterae, except antennal segment V mainly light brown, segments IV–VI with numerous sensory hairs ( +sensilla trichodea +) ventrally on distal half, V with about 12 ( +Fig. 20 +); fore wing with about 6 duplicated cilia, two sub-basal setae capitate; tergites III–VII with 2 pairs of sigmoid setae; tergite IX setae S1 and S2 both capitate. + + + + + + +Material +studied + +. +Holotype +female microptera, + +Australia + +, + +Norfolk +Island + +, +Mt Pitt +, from dead + +Citrus + +, + +25.x.2013 + +( + +LAM +5841 + +). + + + + +Paratypes +(micropterae except as noted): + +Norfolk Island + +, +2 female +macropterae, +7 females +, +7 males +taken with +holotype +; same site and date, +1 male +from + +Araucaria + +litter; same site, +4 female +, +5 male +macropterae, +4 females +, +8 males +, + +22.xii.2013 + + +; + +Mt Bate +, +9 females +, +3 males +from dead + +Citrus + +, + +30.xi.2914 + + +; + +Summit Track +, +1 female +macroptera, +6 females +, +6 males +from dead branch, + +25.xi.2014 + + +. + + +Queensland + +, +Brisbane +, +Mt Nebo +, +2 female +macropterae, +8 females +, +3 males +from dead branch wood, + +27.vii.1968 + +( + +LAM +788 + +); Mt Glorious, +1 female +from dead wood, + +11.xi.2009 + + +; + +Lamington +, +O’Reilly’s +, +3 female +macropterae, +1 female +from dead twigs, 9/ + +10.x.2006 + + +; + +Brisbane +, +200km +north-west, +1 female +macroptera, +1 female +from bark spray, + +8.iii.2015 + + +. + + + + +Comments. +In this species, antennal segment VIII is more constricted basally than in any other member of the genus, including + +villosus + +. Despite this, + +diaphorus + +is otherwise typical of the genus in structure, with the stylets scarcely retracted anterior to the occipital ridge. The antennae are strikingly dimorphic between winged and wingless morphs, both in colour and the presence of extra sensory hairs ventrally on segments IV–VI. In both sexes, macropterae have a group of 10 or more of these small +sensilla trichodea +ventrally on each of antennal segments IV–VI ( +Fig. 20 +), although there are only 4 such sensilla in micropterae. All macropterae and micropterae have three major sense cones on segments III and IV. In contrast to the +type +series from + +Norfolk +Island + +, most +paratype +females from the Brisbane area have the pronotal anteromarginal setae capitate and almost half as long as the anteroangular setae. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F36FFA437C9FF92D4F9FE70.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F36FFA437C9FF92D4F9FE70.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d475d7724d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F36FFA437C9FF92D4F9FE70.xml @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips capitalis + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 9 +, +46 +) + + + + +Male microptera +: Body legs and antennae brown, tarsi and apices of fore tibiae paler, antennal segment III pale in basal half. + + +Antennal segment VIII broad at base, IV–VII evenly narrowed to pedicel; III with 3 sense cones, IV with 4 sense cones. Head longer than wide, ocelli small, cheeks with prominent setae; vertex with little or no sculpture except near posterior margin; po setae long and weakly capitate; maxillary pillars less than 50 microns long, stylets retracted more than half way to po setae, about one third of head width apart with faint maxillary bridge ( +Fig. 9 +). Pronotum with strong median longitudinal apodeme, without sculpture; am setae minute, remaining setae capitate. Mesonotum with weak transverse lines, lateral setal pair minute, wing lobe small with one capitate seta. Metanotum without sculpture, median setal pair slender and acute. Fore femora stout, fore tarsal tooth about as long as tarsal width, fore tibia with small subapical tubercle ( +Fig. 9 +). Prosternal ferna not meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to two small sclerites. +Pelta +broadly hat-shaped, sculpture weak ( +Fig. 9 +); tergites II–VII with no sculpture, with 2 pairs of small, straight wing-retaining setae, lateral major setae weakly capitate but not elongate; tergite IX setae S1 capitate, S2 short and pointed. Sternites III–VI with transverse rows of reticulation anterolaterally ( +Fig. 46 +), VIII with transversely oval pore plate. + + +Measurements +( +holotype +male in microns). Body length 1800. Head, length 195; width 160; po setae 57; longest cheek seta 15. Pronotum, length 160; width 230; major setae—am 5, aa 55, ml 35, epim 50, pa 25. Fore wing length 40. Tergite IX setae +S1 75 +, +S2 35 +. Sternite VIII pore plate dimensions +50 x 15. +Tube length 100. Antennal segments III–VIII length 60, 57, 55, 45, 42, 25. + + +Female microptera +: Essentially similar to male; fore tarsal tooth slender, fore tibia without subapical tubercle; sternites without reticulate areas or pore plate; tergite IX setae S1 capitate, S2 blunt. + + +Female macroptera +: Similar in colour and structure; fore tarsal tooth slender; fore wing weakly shaded on distal half, with 6 duplicated cilia; tergites II–VII each with two pairs of sigmoid setae. + + + + + + +Material +studied + +. +Holotype +male microptera, + + +Australian +Capital Territory + + +, +Canberra +, +Black Mt. +, from old dead wood, + +12.xii.1996 + +( + +LAM +3067 + +). + + + + +Paratypes +(micropterae except as noted): + + +Australian +Capital Territory + + +, +1 female +macroptera, +2 females +, +2 males +taken with +holotype +; same site, from + +Eucalyptus + +dead branches, +2 females +, +2 males +, + +30.iv.2011 + +, +1 male +, + +6.iii.2011 + + +; + +Canberra +, +Oakey Hill +, +3 female +macropterae from dead + +Eucalyptus + +twigs, + +5.iii.2011 + + +; + +Namadji +, +6 female +macropterae, +1 female +, +4 males +with larvae on dry + +Eucalyptus + +branch, + +13.ix.2015 + + +; 1 female 1 male macropterae, +23.iv.2011 +; 3 female 1 male macropterae, 3 males, +21.xi.2010 +. + + + + +Comments +. The mid and hind tibiae are variable in colour amongst the specimens listed, but are darker than in individuals of the other species. The maxillary levers of many of the specimens examined are rotated, such that the stylets are not in their normal retracted position. Relationships of this species are discussed below under the species + +deuae + +. One female macroptera has been studied from southern +Queensland +, Lamington, O’Reillys, that possibly represents this species, but the stylets are disrupted. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F37FFA737C9FDB7D47AFD10.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F37FFA737C9FDB7D47AFD10.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6c1b0eefd8e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F37FFA737C9FDB7D47AFD10.xml @@ -0,0 +1,368 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips chydaeus + +sp.n. + + + + +( +Figs 8 +, +21 +, +38 +) + + + + +Male aptera +: Body and all femora brown, tibiae and tarsi light brown; mid and hind tibiae yellow in basal third, sometimes yellow at apex; antennal segments I–II light brown, III variably yellow toward base and variably light brown toward apex, IV–VIII darker brown. + + +Antennal segment VIII broadly joined to VII, IV–VII narrowed to pedicel ( +Fig. 21 +); III with two sense cones, IV either with two large sense cones or with one large and two smaller ones. Head longer than wide ( +Fig. 8 +), sometimes with one or two weakly developed ocelli, cheeks with weak setae; vertex with no sculpture; po setae long and capitate; maxillary pillars about 50 microns long but with the levers no more than 30 microns, stylets wide apart and retracted half way to po setae. Pronotum with weak median longitudinal apodeme, without sculpture; am setae minute, remaining setae capitate. Mesonotum without sculpture, lateral setal pair minute, no wing lobe. Metanotum without sculpture, median setal pair slender and acute. Fore femora stout, fore tarsal tooth as long as tarsal width, fore tibia with small subapical tubercle. Prosternal ferna not meeting medially, mesopraesternum eroded to two small sclerites and a slender band medially. +Pelta +eroded, irregularly D-shaped; tergites with no sculpture, II–VII with 2 pairs of very small, straight wing-retaining setae, lateral major setae weakly capitate; tergite IX setae S1 long and capitate, S2 short and pointed. Sternites III–VI often with transverse rows of reticulation anterolaterally, VIII with oval pore plate ( +Fig. 38 +). + + +Measurements +( +holotype +male in microns). Body length 1400. Head, length 160; width 150; po setae 50. Pronotum, length 135; width 190; major setae—am 5, aa 35, ml 20, epim 43, pa 30. Tergite IX setae +S1 50 +, +S2 25 +. Sternite VIII pore plate dimensions +40 x 18. +Tube length 85. Antennal segments III–VIII length 45, 47, 47, 40, 40, 23. + + +Female aptera +: similar to male, sense cones on antennal segment IV equally variable; po setae shorter than dorsal eye length; fore tarsal tooth acute, shorter than tarsal width; tergite IX setae S1 and S2 capitate, scarcely longer than basal width of tube. + + +Female macroptera +: similar to male but larger; antennal segments III–IV with sense cones varying in number and sometimes not bilaterally symmetrical, III with 2 or 3, IV with 2 or 4; ocelli well-developed; fore tarsal tooth length about half of tarsal width; fore wing shaded on distal half, with 4 or 5 duplicated cilia and 1 or 2 small capitate sub-basal setae; +pelta +triangular; tergites each with 2 pairs of sigmoid setae. + + + + + + +Material +studied + +. +Holotype +male aptera, + + +New +South Wales + + +, +Tallaganda +, + +Lowden Forest +Park + +, from dead + +Eucalyptus + +branches, + +27.ii.2011 + +( + +LAM +5431 + +). + + + + +Paratypes +(apterae except as noted): + + +New +South Wales + + +, +6 female +macropterae, +3 females +, +3 males +taken with +holotype +; same site and from dead + +Eucalyptus + +, +7 males +, +2 females +, + +6.viii.2006 + + +; 3 female macropterae,1 male, +12.xi.2006 +; 7 female macropterae, 2 females, +9.ii.2013 +; + +Tinderry Range +, +1 female +macroptera, +7 females +, +5 males +from dead branches, + +29-30.ii.2013 + + +. + + + +Australian +Capital Territory + + +, +Mt Ainslie +, +2 female +macropterae, +5 females +, +1 male +from dead twigs, + +11.vi.1995 + + +. + + +Victoria + +, +Mallacoota +, +2 female +macropterae, +1 female +, +1 male +from + +Eucalyptus + +dead nuts, + +1.iv.2011 + + +; + +Nelson +, +1 female +from dead + +Eucalyptus + +nuts, + +5.x.2013 + + +. + + +South Australia + +, +40km +southeast of +Mt Gambier +, +7 female +2 male +macropterae, +5 males +, +4 females +from + +Eucalyptus obliqua + +nuts, + +12.ii.2011 + + +. + + +Queensland + +, + +Brisbane Forest +Park + +, +2 female +macropterae, +3 females +, +2 males +from dead branches, + +3.iv.2011 + + +; + +same locality, +1 female +macroptera + +. 5 females, 2 males on various dates between +xi.2007 +and +iii.2013 +; + +Stanthorpe +, +3 females +, +2 males +from dead wood, + +28.xii.2011 + + +; + +Girraween +, +1 female +macroptera, +1 female +, +2 males +from dead wood, + +29.xii.2011 + + +. + + + + +Comments. +This species exhibits confusing variation in several structures. The largest males have the cheek setae more prominent, the fore femora swollen, each fore tibia with a well-developed subapical tubercle, the fore tarsus very stout, and conspicuous reticulate rows on the sternites, whereas each of these characters is more weakly developed or even absent in small males. The number of antennal sense cones varies even within the series taken with the +holotype +. Macropterae usually have 3 on III and 4 on IV, but some macropterae have only two on both segments, and some apterae have 2 on III but 3 on IV. Moreover, some of the apterae have one or both posterior ocelli weakly developed. Despite the maxillary stylets being retracted into the head half way toward the level of the postocular setae, this species exhibits all of the other character states that are typical of + +Deplorothrips + +. The tube is relatively short and slightly paler toward the base, and tergite IX setae S1 are scarcely longer than the width of the tube. A series of six females and two males have been studied from Carnarvon Station, +Queensland +that are essentially similar to this species but have longer setae; po setae 63 microns; S1 on tergite +IX 75 +microns. A number of specimens of both sexes have been seen from various sites in +Tasmania +, including Flinders Island, that cannot be placed to species securely. Most, but not all, of the females have the pronotal am setae small and capitate as in + +norfuki + +from + +Norfolk +Island + +, but the males have an irregularly transverse oval sternal pore plate as in + +chydaeus + +, and the macropterae have three sense cones on antennal segment III and four on IV, whereas the apterae have two sense cones on both segments. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F39FFA537C9F984D3B6FC57.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F39FFA537C9F984D3B6FC57.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..511d9d32537 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F39FFA537C9F984D3B6FC57.xml @@ -0,0 +1,326 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + +Key to species of + +Deplorothrips + +from Australia + + + + + + + + +1. Metanotum with more than one pair of setae medially ( +Figs 1 +, +36 +); male sternite VIII with broad pore plate ( +Fig. 44 +).................................................................................................. + + +villosus + +sp.n. + + + + + +-. Metanotum with one pair of setae medially ( +Figs 3–5 +; 33–35); male sternite VIII with pore plate smaller or absent....... 2 + + + + + + +2. Head anterior margin yellow to light brown between the eyes ( +Fig. 5 +); metanotum longitudinally sculptured; male with no pore plate.................................................................................... + + +virgulatus + +sp.n. + + + + +-. Head uniformly brown; metanotum either reticulate or with no sculpture between the major setal pair; males, where known, with small pore plate on sternite VIII......................................................................3 + + + + + +3. Metanotum strongly reticulate ( +Fig. 35 +); male with narrow pore plate extending fully across sternite VIII to lateral margins.............................................................................................. + + +retis + +sp.n. + + + + +-. Metanotum weakly reticulate or with no sculpture between median setal pair; male pore plate on sternite VIII much smaller, not extending to lateral margins......................................................................... 4 + + + + + +4. Antennal segment VIII lanceolate ( +Fig. 20 +), microptera with IV as yellow as III, but macroptera with IV brown; IV and V of macroptera with numerous sensory hairs ventrally [pronotal am sometimes capitate; male with small sub-circular pore plate on VIII ( +Fig. 40 +)]........................................................................... + + +diaphorus + +sp.n. + + + + + +-. Antennal segment VIII never lanceolate ( +Figs 21–30 +), macroptera without extra sensory hairs on antennal segments IV and V................................................................................................... 5 + + + + + + +5. Antennal segment V–VI largely yellow ( +Fig. 28 +); male unknown..................................... + + +paspalus + +sp.n. + + + + +-. Antennal segments V–VI uniformly brown or with V slightly paler at base........................................ 6 + + + + +6. Mid and hind tibiae, also usually antennal segment III, clear yellow............................................. 7 + + +-. Mid and hind tibiae, also antennal segment III, brown or at least washed with brown............................... 9 + + + + + +7. Median area of tergites VI–VIII extensively yellow; pronotal am setae longer than discal setae and about 0.5 times as long as aa setae, blunt to weakly capitate ( +Fig. 4 +)......................................................... + + +regina + +sp.n. + + + + +-. Median area of tergites VI–VIII almost uniformly brown; pronotal am setae no larger than discal setae..................8 + + + + + +8. Stylets retracted into head half way to po setae ( +Fig. 10 +); male sternite VIII with slender transverse pore plate ( +Fig. 41 +)................................................................................................. + + +howei + +sp.n. + + + + + +-. Stylets low in head, wide apart and straight ( +Fig. 6 +); male sternite VIII with round pore plate ( +Fig. 42 +)........ + + +makrus + +sp.n. + + + + + + + +9. Tergite IX setae S1 finely acute and longer than tube................................................. + + +minaei + +sp.n. + + + + +-. Tergite IX setae S1 capitate, rarely bluntly pointed, less than 0.75 times as long tube.............................. 10 + + + + + +10. Male sternite VIII with pore plate strongly transverse, 5–6 times as wide as median length ( +Fig. 43 +); both sexes micropterous, but with wing lobe scarcely 20 microns long; antennal segments III and IV each with 2 sense cones.......... + + +mongai + +sp.n. + + + + + +-. Male sternite VIII with pore plate transversely oval, less than 2.5 times as wide as median length ( +Figs 38, 39 +); if micropterous, then wing lobe at least 50 microns long; frequently with antennal segment III bearing 3 sense cones, and IV with 4...... 11 + + + + + + +11. Maxillary stylets retracted to level of po setae, sub-parallel medially in head and less than one fifth of head width apart ( +Fig. 13 +)........................................................................................ + + +deuae + +sp.n. + + + + + +-. Maxillary stylets less deeply retracted, at least one third of head width apart and not parallel medially ( +Figs 8, 9 +)........ 12 + + + + + + +12. Mid and hind tibiae extensively brown; antennal segment III with 3 sense cones, IV with 4; micropterae and macropterae............................................................................................. + + +capitalis + +sp.n. + + + + +-. Mid and hind tibiae yellowish, at least on basal third; number of sense cones commonly different; apterae and macropterae13 + + + + + +13. Both sexes with pronotal am setae acute and scarcely 7 microns long; male sternite VIII pore plate broadly oval ( +Fig. 38 +)............................................................................................. + + +chydaeus + +sp.n. + + + + + +-. Female with pronotal am setae weakly capitate and 15–27 microns long; male sternite VIII pore plate subcircular.................................................................................................... + + +norfuki + +sp.n. + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F3FFFAA37C9FEC7D4B0FAA5.xml b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F3FFFAA37C9FEC7D4B0FAA5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6c4f98df660 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/56/3745563A4F3FFFAA37C9FEC7D4B0FAA5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,602 @@ + + + +Australian mycophagous species of the genus Deplorothrips (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) + + + +Author + +Mound, Laurence A. + + + +Author + +Tree, Desley J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4208 + + +3 + + +201 +220 + + + +journal article +37416 +10.11646/zootaxa.4208.3.1 +140013bd-5126-4436-8793-816a26093fcc +1175-5326 +205773 +8F4AF129-0A68-4EBC-AF85-06F634EC3897 + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips +Mound & Walker + + + + + + + + + +Deplorothrips + +Mound & Walker, 1986 +: 49 + + +. Type species + +D. bassus +Mound & Walker + + + + +The pattern of character states exhibited by the new species described below is interpreted as indicating that these species represent a single lineage that has radiated within +Australia +. These species, with two exceptions, conform satisfactorily to the original generic diagnosis of + +Deplorothrips + +, as well as the diagnosis published by +Okajima (2006) +. However, there is remarkable variation in many character states between some of the species. Rather than produce another long and confusing generic diagnosis noting the many differences in particular character states, variation in each of the major characters is here discussed individually. In considering this variation, it must be stressed that there is often a lack of correlation between the various states, such as maxillary stylet retraction and form of antennal segment VIII. This lineage of Australian and eastern Asian species that is designated the genus + +Deplorothrips + +is presumably derived from within the “ + +Phlaeothrips + +-lineage” (sensu +Mound & Marullo 1996 +) and is most closely related to the genus + +Hoplothrips + +. The maxillary stylets in + +Deplorothrips + +species are wide apart in the head, and in most species are less retracted into the head capsule than most +Phlaeothripinae +. Species of + +Hoplothrips + +and related genera including + +Acanthothrips + +, + +Hoplandrothrips + +and + +Phlaeothrips + +, all have the stylets deeply retracted, at least to the level of the postocular setae, and close together medially almost for the full length of the head (see figures in +Mound & Walker 1986 +; +Mound & Tree 2013 +). One exception to this generalisation is the minute North American species, + +Hoplothrips smithi + +, in which the stylets are short and low in the head, but in the absence of any modern account of the New World species of fungus-feeding +Phlaeothripinae +it is not possible to comment on the relationships of this species. + + + + +Character state variation. +Body colour +: Most species are medium to light brown with red internal pigments. The hind tibiae are clear yellow in many species, but light brown, or at least washed with brown, in some of the most common species in Australia. The antennal segments are generally brown with III paler in most species, although segment III is clear yellow in a few species, and most of the specimens in the + +bassus + +-complex from New Zealand have antennal segment III brown. The major body setae are consistently pale on all of the species considered here, with the exception of + +retis + +. + + +Antennal segmentation +: Eight segments are present in all species, with segment VIII usually broadly based (almost fused to VII in two species from southern Japan), but narrowed to the base in two species described below, and in one of these almost lanceolate ( +Figs 20–32 +). + + +Antennal sense cones +: Segment III bears either 1, 2 or 3 sense cones (= +sensilla basiconica +), whereas IV bears 2, 3 or 4. In some species the macropterae bear more and larger sense cones than micropterae or apterae, and in one of these species macropterae have numerous small sensory hairs (= +sensilla trichodea +) ventrally on segments IV–VI ( +Fig. 20 +). A remarkable variant is the presence on some specimens at the inner apex of segment IV of either two small sense cones or of one large sense cone, and bilateral asymmetry in this occurs in some individuals. Sense cones occasionally fall off during slide preparation, and it is essential to look for the basal pores of these structures to determine their presence or absence. Variation in the number of sense cones on antennal segment IV is also known to occur in the widespread predator, + +Karnyothrips flavipes + +(see +Okajima 2006 +). + + + +FIGURES 1–7 +. + +Deplorothrips + +species, head and thorax. +(1) + +villosus + +holotype; +(2) + +diaphorus + +female macroptera; +(3) + +paspalus + +holotype; +(4) + +regina + +holotype; +(5) + +virgulatus + +male paratype; +(6) + +makrus + +female macroptera; +(7) + +norfuki + +holotype. + + + + +FIGURES 8–13 +. + +Deplorothrips + +species, head and thorax. +(8) + +chydaeus + +female; +(9) + +capitalis + +holotype; +(10) + +howei + +holotype; +(11) + +minaei + +female; +(12) + +retis + +holotype; +(13) + +deuae + +female. + + + +Head cheek setae +: The typical condition involves one or two pairs of rather weak cheek setae ( +Figs 1–7 +), but major males can have several pairs with some setae considerably stouter ( +Fig. 17 +). In a few species the cheek setae are weak and scarcely apparent. + + +Mouth cone length +: The mouth cone is usually short and rounded, but in a few species it is pointed and longer, extending beyond the fore coxae ( +Figs 18–19 +). + + + +FIGURES 14–19 +. + +Deplorothrips + +species, head and thorax. Large males 14–17: +(14) + +makrus + +holotype; +(15) + +minaei + +holotype; +(16) + +mongai + +holotype; +(17) + +villosus + +. Prosternum 18–19: +(18) + +deuae + +(holotype); +(19) + +makrus + +. + + + +Maxillary stylet position +: Although low in the head in typical + +Deplorothrips + +species ( +Okajima 2006 +), there is considerable variation. The images of heads ( +Figs 1–13 +) are here presented in the order of increasing stylet retraction. This emphasises that there is a progression from stylets not retracted anterior to the occipital ridge, to stylets retracted to the level of the postocular setae, with no clear distinction between the various conditions. The maxillary levers, articulating at the anterior end of the straight and rigid maxillary pillars, are commonly orientated in +Phlaeothripinae +along the longitudinal axis of the head ( + +Fig. +9 + +in +Heming 1993 +). Among + +Deplorothrips + +species, this condition is found only in + +retis + + +sp.n +. + +, a species that, as discussed below, is only weakly related to the other members of the genus. In most species of + +Deplorothrips + +the levers are orientated at an angle toward the mid-line ( +Fig. 13 +), and in many species they are also not in a horizontal plane but are directed dorsally and thus appear foreshortened ( +Figs 1–7 +). Slide-mounting procedures often result in the stylets becoming disrupted, and in such specimens it may not be possible to predict the natural retracted condition. When seriously disrupted, the levers may be orientated almost transversely or even directed posteriorly, and the stylets are not straight but slightly wavy. + + +Fore tarsal tooth +: This is present in both sexes, although varying greatly in size and shape. In some individuals it is short and sharply pointed, but in large males it is bluntly pointed and at least as long as the fore tarsal width. + + + +FIGURES 20–32 +. + +Deplorothrips + +species, antennae. +(20) + +diaphorus + +, macroptera, segments IV–VIII ventral; +(21) + +chydaeus + +; +(22) + +deuae + +(holotype); +(23) + +howei + +; +(24) + +makrus + +; +(25) + +minaei + +; +(26) + +mongai + +; +(27) + +norfuki + +; +(28) + +paspalus + +; +(29) + +regina + +; +(30) + +retis + +; +(31) + +virgulatus + +; +(32) + +villosus + +. + + + + +FIGURES 33–47 +. + +Deplorothrips + +species, metanotum and male sternites. +(33) + +howei + +, large male, meso and metanotum. +(34) + +regina + +, metanotum and tergites I–II. +(35) + +retis + +, metanotum and +pelta +. +(36) + +villosus + +, large male, metanotum and tergites I–II. +(37) + +norfuki + +, holotype metanotum and tergites I–II. Male sternite VIII pore plate 38–44: +(38) + +chydaeus + +; +(39) + +deuae + +; +(40) + +diaphorus + +; +(41) + +howei + +; +(42) + +makrus + +; +(43) + +mongai + +; +(44) + +villosus + +. +(45) + +howei + +, male fore tarsus & tibia. Male sternites V–VI 46–47: +(46) + +capitalis + +; +(47) + +diaphorus + +. + + + +Male fore tibia +: The inner apex bears a small tubercle in males of most species, but this tubercle is larger in major males than in small males ( +Figs 23 +, +45 +). + + +Pronotum +: Although transverse in females, the pronotum of large males is more elongate with a stout longitudinal median apodeme ( +Figs 14–16 +). The notopleural sutures are almost always complete. + + +Pronotal setae +: Four pairs of major setae are always developed and capitate, but the am setae are usually acute and no larger than discal setae in both sexes. However, in females of a few species the am setae are capitate although rarely more than half as long as the aa setae ( +Figs 1, 4 +). + + +Thoracic sternites +: Prosternal basantra are not present in any species, and the ferna are transverse and often almost meeting in the midline ( +Figs 18–19 +). The mesopraesternum is sometimes transverse in macropterae, but is eroded in most individuals to a pair of small lateral sclerites. Metathoracic sterno-pleural sutures are present in all individuals. + + +Metanotum +: In most species of the genus, whether macropterous or apterous, the metanotum lacks sculpture, although in two species it is reticulate ( +Figs 1 +, +36 +), and in a few species the posterior area of the metanotum of large males bears curious longitudinal sculpture ( +Figs 5 +, +33, 37 +). In one species, the metanotum bears many small setae. + + +Fore wing condition +: Macropterae are generally uncommon in this genus, but when present the fore wings are almost parallel sided, and bear no more than 12 duplicated cilia. Apterae usually have no indication of a wing lobe, but apterae in a few species have a minute round lobe about 5 microns in diameter, and micropterae of some species have the wing lobe less than 25 microns long. These small lobes sometimes bear one or two setae. There is thus no simple distinction between winged and wingless conditions. Moreover, although micropterae and apterae usually lack ocelli, some such specimens have paired ocelli, or even just one, weakly developed posterior ocellus. + + + +Pelta +: The + +shape of the first abdominal tergite is rather indeterminate in the species considered here. In a few macropterae it approaches a typical + +Hoplandrothrips + +condition ( +Mound & Tree 2013 +), but in most individuals it is shorter and broader, ranging from sub-quadrate to D-shaped, and often with the anterolateral margins partially eroded ( +Figs 9–10 +; 14–16). + + +Tergite IX setae +: Setal pairs S1 and S2 are capitate and shorter than the tube in most species, sometimes no longer than the basal width of the tube. However, in one species they are pointed and longer than the tube. The accessory setal pair between S1 and S2 is usually long ( + +Dang +et al +. 2013 + +). + + +Tergal wing-retaining setae +: The typical two pairs of sigmoid setae are present in all species studied, but although they are large and sigmoid in macropterae, they are short, straight and acute in micropterae and apterae. + + +Male sternites III–VI +: The largest males of some species usually have transverse rows of specialised reticulation anterolaterally on these sternites ( +Figs 42, 46, 47 +); these are presumably associated with glandular tissues ( +Okajima 2006 +). Small males of the same species usually lack these structures. + + +Male sternite VIII +: Typically the males in this genus have a small pore plate, but this varies in shape between species from small and oval to slender and transverse, although in one species it is broadly transverse ( +Figs 38–44 +), and males of one species lack any pore plate. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/63/37456317A049769AEF67FD3B37F370A3.xml b/data/37/45/63/37456317A049769AEF67FD3B37F370A3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f31c8dc4e29 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/63/37456317A049769AEF67FD3B37F370A3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@ + + + +A reassessment of Marquesan Ochrosia and Rauvolfia (Apocynaceae) with two new combinations + + + +Author + +Lorence, David H. + + + +Author + +Butaud, Jean-Francois + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2011 + +4 + + +95 +107 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.4.1599 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.4.1599 +1314-2003-4-95 +FFD8E7279D12FFDD4360FFCDFFABE44B +576074 + + + + +Ochrosia brownii (Fosberg & Sachet) Lorence & Butaud +comb. nov. +Figs 1A, B + + + + +Neisosperma brownii +Fosberg & Sachet, Micronesica 8: 49, 1972 [as + +Neiosperma + +]). [Basionym] + + + +Type. + +Marquesas Islands: +Nuku Hiva: without precise locality, 15 July 1921, F. B. H. Brown 541 (Holotype BISH-500905!). + + + +Ochrosia parviflora + +sensu F. Br., non (G. Forst.) Henslow + + + +Description. + +Tree +to 13 m tall, trunk to 24 cm diam., branchlets glabrous, leafy twigs 4-4.5 mm in diam, terete, drying wrinkled, older leafless twigs 6-7 mm in diam., latex white. +Leaves +opposite on smaller branchlets, ternate on larger branchlets, petiolate, leaf axils with dark brown, linear-digitate colleters 1-1.5 mm long secreting pale yellow resin; blades obovate-elliptic, 9.4-16.5 +x +3.2-6.4 cm, base narrowly cuneate, attenuate, apex shortly acuminate, glabrous, discolorous, drying brown above, yellowish-brown below, when fresh green to yellow green above, pale green below, both surfaces glossy, secondary veins 15-20 on each side, secondary and tertiary veins visible above, prominulous beneath, margins conspicuously and tightly revolute; petioles +17 +-33 mm long, 1.7-2 mm in diam. +Inflorescence +terminal, 7-12 cm long, trichotomous, branching to the third degree, with 2 primary branches at apex of peduncle, each with 12-18 flowers, glabrous, axes with small, scale-like bracts; flowers on pedicels 1.5-4 mm long, 5-merous; calyx lobes obtuse to rounded, 2 +x +2.5 mm; corolla in bud to 10 mm long; corolla at anthesis white, fragrant, corolla tube 6-7 +x +3 mm, corolla lobes 5, contorted to the right, 6-7 +x +2-25 mm, rounded at apex; ovary conical, 0.7-0.8 mm long, bicarpellate, style 0.8 mm long, stigmatic head ovoid, 0.7-0.8 mm long with tuft of hairs at apex and green ring (but no collar) at base, nectary 0.3 mm, 2-lobed, the lobes alternating with and partly covering the carpels. +Infructescence +with peduncle c. 17 cm long; fruits composed of two fleshy mericarps, when fresh orange at maturity, ellipsoid, 37-53 +x +27-37 +x +25-36 mm, mesocarp orange, 5 mm thick; endocarp externally fibrous, internally woody, 31-48 +x +23-33 +x +19-27 mm, the fibers to 1.5 mm in diam. +Seed +2 per fruit, ellipsoid, 25 +x +23-26 +x +c. 4 mm. + + + +Distribution. + +Nuku Hiva, Marquesas Islands, originally known only from the type collected in the vicinity of the Toovii plateau at about 900 m ( +Brown 1935 +). The species was rediscovered by +Jean-Francois +Butaud in 2003 on Nuku Hiva where a single tree and some juveniles were located on the Vaioa plateau (at Matahamo, also called Vaipupui) SE of Toovii. + + + +Ecology. + +This species occurs in evergreen wet forest between 730 and 900 m elevation, with species of + +Hibiscus + +, + +Ixora + +, + +Metrosideros + +, + +Pandanus + +, + +Phyllanthus + +, + +Premna + +, + +Wikstroemia + +, + +Xylosma + +, and ferns including + +Asplenium australasicum + +(J. Sm.) Hook., + +Histiopteris incisa + +(Thunb.) J. Sm., and + +Microsorum grossum + +(Langsd. & Fisch.) Brownlie. + + + +Conservation status. + +When evaluated using the IUCN criteria for endangerment (IUCN +2001 +) + +Ochrosia brownii + +falls into the Critically Endangered (CR) category, which designates species facing the highest risk of extinction in the wild. IUCN Red List Category: +Critically Endangered +(CR) B1a, b; B2a, B2b ( +i-iii +): B1, extent of occurrence estimated to be less than 100 km2, and B1a, known to exist at only a single location; B1b (i-iii), continuing projected decline in (i) extent of occurrence, (ii) area of occupancy, and (iii) area, extent and quality of habitat; B2, area of occupancy estimated to be less than 10 km2, and B2a, a single population known. B2b ( +i-iii +), habitat continuing decline inferred. The suitable habitat for + +Ochrosia brownii + +on Nuku Hiva ( +c. +340 km2) is indicated as an endangered environment, threatened by human activity (deforestation and fire), feral animals, and invasive plants, reducing the extent of the forest. + + + +Specimens examined. + +Marquesas Islands: +Nuku Hiva: Matahamo, Vaioa, fin de la piste +forestiere +, 758 m, 2 Jan. 2003, Butaud 8 (PAP); Matahamo, Vaioa, 758 m, 9 Feb. 2003, Butaud 10 (PAP); Vaipupui, amont de la piste +forestiere +menant +a +la +derniere +parcelle de pins, 737 m, 27 Jan. 2010, Butaud & Benne 2586 (PAP). + + + +Discusison. + +Since 2006, a conservation plan proposed by the Environment Direction of French Polynesia has been implemented, with conservation +ex situ +(seed collection and conservatory plantings) and +in situ +(fencing enclosure of the population and enrichment planting of seedlings inside) +. + + + +Figure 1. +A, B + +Ochrosia brownii + +. +A +inflorescence and open flower and buds showing right-contorted corolla lobes (Vaipupui, Nuku Hiva, Feb. 2003, Butaud unvouchered) +B +branchlet with apocarpous fruit composed of paired mericarps (Vaipupui, Nuku Hiva, Butaud 8); +C, D + +Ochrosia fatuhivensis + +. +C +inflorescence with open flower and buds, Hanativa (Fatu Hiva, Nov. 2009, Butaud 2458) +D +ripe mericarps, seed showing fibers and germinating seed (Hanativa, Fatu Hiva, Nov. 2009, Butaud 2458). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/84/374584E8BFD359BC8F38A6E833DB9E28.xml b/data/37/45/84/374584E8BFD359BC8F38A6E833DB9E28.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a9a0eec19cf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/84/374584E8BFD359BC8F38A6E833DB9E28.xml @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@ + + + +Integrative taxonomy and analysis of species richness patterns of nocturnal Darwin wasps of the genus Enicospilus Stephens (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ophioninae) in Japan + + + +Author + +Shimizu, So +Laboratory of Insect Biodiversity and Ecosystem Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Rokkodaicho 1 - 1, Nada, Kobe, Hyogo 657 - 8501, Japan & DC and Overseas Challenge Program for Young Researchers, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan & Depertment of Life Sciences, the Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, UK +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5202-4552 +parasitoidwasp.sou@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. +Depertment of Life Sciences, the Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, UK +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7223-5333 + + + +Author + +Maeto, Kaoru +Laboratory of Insect Biodiversity and Ecosystem Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Rokkodaicho 1 - 1, Nada, Kobe, Hyogo 657 - 8501, Japan + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +990 + + +1 +144 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.990.55542 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.990.55542 +1313-2970-990-1 +7B73642C278D40F89091B26213C9A704 +9F51F78CD53F5005A305DE65494002C4 + + + + +Enicospilus ramidulus (Linnaeus, 1758) +Figure 39 + + + + +Ichneumon ramidulus +Linnaeus, 1758: 566; HT, sex and locality unknown, not examined. + + + +Specimens examined. +Total of 144 specimens (93♀♀50♂♂ and 1 unsexed): England (4♀♀1♂), Germany (1♀), Italy (1♀), Japan (71♀♀47♂♂ and 1 unsexed), Korea (1♀), Mallorca (6♀♀), Russia (1♀), Scotland (1♀), Spain (1♀), Sweden (2♀♀1♂), Switzerland (1♂), unknown (4♀♀). + + +Distribution. + +Afrotropical, Oriental, and trans-Palaearctic regions ( +Yu et al. 2016 +); this is a predominantly Palaearctic species and may be restricted to there, i.e., all reliable distribution records have been only from the Palaearctic region. + +Enicospilus ramidulus + +is one of the most frequently encountered + +Enicospilus + +species throughout the Palaearctic. + + +JAPAN: [ +Hokkaido +] ( +Uchida 1928 +; +Hori et al. 2009 +; present study); [ +Tohoku +] Aomori* and Fukushima*; [Hokuriku] Niigata ( +Ohmori 1960 +; present study), Toyama*, Ishikawa*, and Fukui*; [ +Kanto-Koshin +] Ibaraki*, Tochigi*, Nagano ( +Uchida 1928 +; present study), Saitama*, +Tokyo +( +Konishi et al. 2014 +; present study), and Kanagawa ( +Kawashima et al. 2018 +; present study); [ +Tokai +] Shizuoka* and Mie*; [Kinki] +Kyoto +( +Chiu 1954 +; +Iwata 1960 +), +Ōsaka +*, +Hyogo +( +Iwata 1958 +, +1960 +; present study), Nara ( +Iwata 1960 +), and Wakayama*; [ +Chugoku +] Shimane ( +Konishi and Nakamura 2000 +, +2002 +; present study) and Hiroshima ( +Konishi and Nakamura 2000 +, +2002 +, +2005 +, +2010 +; present study); [Shikoku] Kagawa ( +Iwata 1960 +) and Ehime ( +Konishi and Yamamoto 2000 +); [ +Kyushu +] Fukuoka* and Kumamoto*. *New records. + + + +Bionomics. + +Recorded from a wide variety of hosts, but some records are undoubtedly the result of misidentifications of the ichneumonid. Reliable rearings are from species of +Noctuidae +, particularly the subfamily +Hadeninae +( +Broad and Shaw 2016 +). + + + +Differential diagnosis. + +This species is sometimes confused with + +E. melanocarpus + +but is easily distinguishable (cf. Differential diagnosis of + +E. melanocarpus + +). Some species have similarly shaped fore wing sclerites, but + +E. ramidulus + +can be distinguished by many characters, for example, the wider face (Fig. +39B +), black posterior segments of the metasoma (Fig. +39A +), and entirely moderately punctate meso- and metapleuron (Fig. +39E +). Some other Japanese species share a similar colour pattern (i.e., body entirely testaceous except for black posterior segments of the metasoma, as in Figs +28A +, +42A +, +53A +) as + +E. ramidulus + +(Fig. +39A +); these species can be separated from each other using the summarised characters in Table +8 +. + + + +Figure 39. + +Enicospilus ramidulus + +(Linnaeus, 1758) ♀ from Japan +A +habitus +B +head, frontal view +C +head, dorsal view +D +head, lateral view +E +mesosoma, lateral view +F +central part of fore wing. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/87/374587B29258FFD9FF56FBEFDD74FEBF.xml b/data/37/45/87/374587B29258FFD9FF56FBEFDD74FEBF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3838228c136 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/87/374587B29258FFD9FF56FBEFDD74FEBF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,958 @@ + + + +Rediscovery of the 220 - year-old holotype of the Banded Iguana, Brachylophus fasciatus (Brongniart, 1800) in the Paris Natural History Museum + + + +Author + +Ineich, Ivan + + + +Author + +Fisher, Robert N. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4138 + + +2 + + +381 +391 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4138.2.10 +3244ad41-2d35-47c1-9624-7ad33b5ff8f6 +1175-5326 +259777 +683BD945-FE55-4616-B18A-33F05B2FDD30 + + + + + + + +Results and discussion + + + + + + + +The original description by Alexandre +Brongniart (1800) +. + +Named “Iguane à bandes”, Banded iguana, +Brongniart (1800) +noted in the description of this lizard that the only specimen he had on hand (thus, the +holotype +by monotypy) had a shorter second lighter band on its back that did not extend entirely to the belly (« la seconde [bande dorsale] plus courte ») on either side, thus having the appearance of a saddle ( +Fig. 1 +). The size of that unique specimen was, according to the original text, about +15 cm +snout-vent length and a tail length three times longer than body length. These mensural data and this uncommon banding pattern allowed us to check the seven MNHN-RA historic specimens (18th and 19th century specimens only) and to determine if a specimen with such size and banding exists among them. + + +The +holotype +of Brongniart was collected by Claude Gaspard Antoine Riche during the travel around the world of Antoine Reymond Joseph de Bruni d'Entrecasteaux from + +1791 to 1794 +in + +the search of La Pérouse. Riche died very young (35 years old) and Georges Cuvier himself wrote a laudatory biography of that exceptional man ( +Cuvier 1797 +). The voyage was made by two vessels, ‘ +La Recherche +’ and ‘ +L’Espérance +’, the latter with Claude Riche on board as naturalist. That expedition did not visit +Fiji +but only ‘Tonga-Tabou’ (Tongatapu, +Kingdom of Tonga +) from +23 March 1793 +to +10 April 1793 +before continuing to +New Caledonia +. The drawing upon which the plate in the original description of 1800 ( +Fig. 1 +A; Planche VI in the original description placed between pages 92– 93 but not numbered) was made by Maréchal, certainly based on the preserved +type +specimen deposited in the private collection of Brongniart at that time, as reported by +Daudin (1802) +(see below). On that plate is written for +Fig. 1 +: « 2/3 de la grandeur naturelle » = 2/3rd of the original size. Riche certainly only collected one unique specimen and he did not make a written description of the living specimen (since all descriptions refer to a blue coloration which corresponds to the green life colour faded into blue once the lizard was preserved in alcohol from several months). That first description dated 1800 is valid and we agree with +Brygoo (1989) +that the species description should be attributed to +Brongniart (1800) +and not to +Brongniart (1805) +. + + + +FIGURE 1. +Holotype of + +Iguana fasciata + +as illustrated in (A) Brongniart (1800) and (B) Brongniart (1805). The saddle-like second mid-dorsal lighter band is easily seen. Spotting on neck and white throat are also diagnostic of + +B. fasciatus + +in those images. + + + + + +Brachylophus fasciatus +( +Brongniart, 1800 +) + +and subsequent authors. + +Shortly after the original description, +Daudin (1802) +removed the species from + +Iguana + +and placed it in +Agama +. On page 354, he wrote « Sous la base de chaque cuisse il y a une rangée de six grains poreux. » = 6 pores under the base of each thigh. Total length about +2 feet +. Later he noted that « le cou est moucheté en dessus par environ vingt-quatre petites taches arrondies, d’un bleu pâle; et il a en dessous d’autres taches plus petites d’un bleu foncé » = the neck is spotted above by about 24 small rounded pale blue spots; it has other dark blue smaller spots below. +Daudin (1802) +also noted « quatre bandes d’un bleu foible [= faible], transversales, plus larges sur les flancs, et dont la seconde est plus courte » (= four transverse bands of light blue, larger on the flanks and among which the second is shorter). Like +Brongniart (1800 +; +1805 +), +Daudin (1802) +also did not specify the side of the body on which the dorsal band is shorter, thus suggesting it is shorter on both sides and saddle-like. He also indicated (page 355) the location of the unique specimen he examined: « Cet agame fait partie de la collection d’histoire naturelle de mon ami Alexandre Brongniart, qui a bien voulu me le communiquer » = This agama is part of the private natural history collection of my friend Alexandre Brongniart who was so kind as to loan it to me. The examination made by Daudin corresponds without any doubt to the +type +specimen previously described by Brongniart two years earlier. The +holotype +is distinguishable by its second lighter midbody band which is interrupted on both sides rather than continuous onto the belly like the other bands. This character is very uncommon in + +B. fasciatus + +. + + +Brongniart (1805) +later noted the « seconde bande du corps plus courte » = second body band shorter. He indicated the size of the +holotype +as « environ 7 décimètres de long du museau à l’extrémité de la queue » = about 7 decimeters ( +70 cm +) long from snout to tail end, and also « queue annelée mais brune à son extrémité » = tail annulated but brown at its end, « La queue est près de trois fois aussi longue que le corps » = Tail is about three times as long as the body. In that second text, published five years after the original description, +Brongniart (1805) +again noted separately that the second body dorsal band does not reach the belly or that second lighter body band is shorter. Note also that although both plates of +Brongniart (1800 +; +1805 +) were made by Maréchal and represent the same specimen, they are not identical ( +Fig. 1 +). At that time it was not really expensive to produce different engravings for plates in publications and authors often used several distinct plates in different issues of their publications to illustrate the same specimen (R. Bour, pers. comm.). The particular second dorsal saddle-like lighter band not reaching the belly is clearly visible on the left and right side of the animal in both plates illustrating Brongniart’s +holotype +(1800; 1805) [see +Fig. 1 +]. + + +Duméril and Bibron (1837: 226–229) +noted that in + +Brachylophus fasciatus + +the top of some femoral scales is pierced by a pore. They counted 8–9 pores in males. Measurements of only one specimen are indicated as: 74″, total length. 12″, body length. 4″, head length. 54″, tail length. Those measurements contain a mistake since body length + head length + tail length should be equal to total length. Thus 12+4+54=70 and not +74 cm +. If we consider total length ( +74 cm +), tail length ( +54 cm +) and body length [without head] ( +12 cm +) as correct, and that the mistake was made only in head length measurement ( +8 cm +is right and not +4 cm +as indicated), those measurements correspond to MNHN-RA 2372 and not to MNHN-RA 6812 (see +Table 3 +). The former was collected by Quoy and Gaimard between +1826 and 1829 +thus after the description of + +Iguana fasciata + +and the latter specimen has no data in MNHN-RA catalogues. Additionally MNHN-RA 2372 as measured by us is +19.2 cm +SVL and represents the largest known + +Brachylophus fasciatus + +(see also +Gibbons, 1981 +; +Pregill & Dye 1989 +). The second and third largest specimens known are also from +Tonga +and are 18.2 and +17.9 cm +, this is out of 70 + +B. fasciatus + +measured from +Fiji +(Fisher, unpub. data). + + +Duméril and Bibron (1837) +clearly examined several specimens but did not note that one of them had an incomplete mid-dorsal lighter band, as indicated several times by +Brongniart (1800 +; +1805 +) for his +holotype +specimen. Thus, they certainly did not examine the +holotype +of Brongniart at that time. +Duméril and Bibron (1837: 229) +noted Tongatapu as the source of Quoy and Gaimard material, but incorrectly indicated the overall distribution for the species as “Indes orientales, et dans quelques îles de la Nouvelle-Guinée” (East Indies and some islands of New +Guinea +). + + +In the 1851 catalogue of A.M.C. Duméril and A.H.A. Duméril, seven specimens are listed in the MNHN-RA collection (see +Table 1 +). These authors also reported a specimen of + +Brachylophus fasciatus + +from: « +Ile +Wallis +(arch. Oua-Horn, Océanie): M. Arnoux » [the main island, +Wallis +is also called ‘Uvea, certainly indicated by “Oua”] and another collected by “Leguillou” (original spelling is Le Guillou) with unknown origin but from “Oceania”; they also noted the existence of three specimens collected by Quoy and Gaimard from Tongatabou (arch. des Amis [ +Friendly Islands +] or +Tonga +, Oceania), another specimen from Arnoux also from +Tonga +and one specimen without any data from Oceania (MNHN-RA 6812). This is the only specimen without collection date whereas all others were collected after Brongniart’s original description according to their catalogue data. This mysterious specimen, if in agreement with Brongniart’s +type +specimen, could originate from the private collection of Brongniart. + + +MNHN-RA 6812 was most likely still in the private collection of A. Brongniart and not available to Duméril and Bibron in 1837 ( +Duméril & Bibron 1837 +). We suspect that the whole or part of the private herpetological collection of Brongniart ( +1770–1847 +) arrived at MNHN-RA only after his death in 1847 and before 1851 since our suspected +holotype +was included in the 1851 MNHN-RA catalogue list ( +Duméril & Duméril 1851 +). The +holotype +of another species described by Brongniart in +1800 in +the same publication, + +Chamaeleo bifidus +Brongniart, 1800 + +[ + +Furcifer bifidus + +] is also present in MNHN-RA collections, thus supporting the assumption that Brongniart’s +types +were given to MNHN-RA collections. + + + +TABLE 1. +The seven MNHN-RA specimens reported in Duméril and Duméril (1851: 64). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CollectorLocalityNumber
ArnouxWallis (Oua-Horn)1
Le GuillouOceania1
Quoy & GaimardTongatabou2 (ad. and subad.)
Quoy & GaimardTongatabou1
ArnouxTongatabou1
UnknownOceania1
+ + +An unpublished hand-written catalogue in the MNHN-RA Amphibian and Reptile collection begun ca. 1864 reveals (on p. 122) that six specimens present today (see below) were also present in 1864 (except the specimen from +Wallis +; +Table 1 +) and also that MNHN-RA 5283 from +Fiji +, collected by Henri Filhol, arrived later, in 1876, and was registered on a subsequent page. Filhol was a member of one of the expeditions sent to observe the transit of Venus in +1874–1875 +. He travelled to Campbell +Island +and +New Zealand +, passing through +Fiji +where he collected several reptiles. Among them was +Labionaris filholi +Brocchi, 1876, an endemic elapid species named in his honour, but which had been previously described as + +Ogmodon vitianus +Peters, 1864 + +and thus has to be considered as a synonym (see +Zug & Ineich 1993 +). His MNHN-RA + +Brachylophus + +specimen can be identified as a typical + +B. bulabula + +endemic to +Fiji +(see +Table 2 +below). + + +As in the previous 1851 catalogue (see above; +Duméril & Duméril 1851 +), there is no collecting locality or collector noted in the 1864 catalogue for MNHN-RA 6812. The specimen indicated as from +Wallis +arrived in MNHN-RA collections before 1851 and is listed in both catalogues as having arrived in +November 1846 +. In his +type +catalogue of the lizards in MNHN-RA collections, +Guibé (1954) +did not consider + +Brachylophus fasciatus + +or + +Iguana fasciata +. + +This indicated that he regarded the +type +as never having been present in the MNHN- RA collections. +Gibbons (1981: 157) +also noted earlier that “Since there is no record of this specimen in Guibé’s (1954) list of lizard +types +in the Paris Museum, it appears to have been lost, or to have remained in Brongniart’s private collection”. Later in the catalogue of the iguanid +type +specimens of MNHN-RA collections, +Brygoo (1989) +indicated that the specimen figured on Pl. 6, fig. 1 of +Brongniart (1800) +is the +holotype +but that it should be considered lost since there is no indication that a specimen was collected by Riche or given by Brongniart to the MNHN-RA collections. +Brygoo (1989: 43) +also agreed that the genus + +Brachylophus + +should be attributed to Cuvier +in +Guérin-Méneville (1829). Both +Etheridge (1982) +and +Hollingsworth (2004) +in their checklists of iguanids indicated that no +type +was designated by +Brongniart (1800) +for + +fasciatus + +and both also list the Horn Islands ( +Wallis and Futuna +) record based on +Duméril and Duméril (1851) +. + + + +Specimens present in MNHN-RA collections on +April 2015 +. + +As in the 1851 catalogue of Duméril and Duméril, only seven specimens of + +Brachylophus + +were present in the MNHN-RA collections on +April 2015 +. However, there are some differences in specimen composition: three specimens from Quoy and Gaimard and one specimen from Le Guillou in the 1851 catalogue versus two specimens from Quoy and Gaimard and two specimens from Le Guillou in collections and catalogues on +April 2015 +. That problem cannot be solved and there is no way to know which is the correct composition of the original collection. Note also that the seventh specimen now present in MNHN-RA collections (MNHN-RA 5283) was collected on +Fiji +by Filhol but was only acquired in 1876 as indicated above. Thus, there is clearly one specimen that was lost between 1851 (seven specimens +without +that of Filhol) and today (seven specimens +with +that of Filhol) and that specimen is the one reported from the Horn Islands above ( +Table 1 +). This one is especially significant as it represents the only record for the genus from that island chain ( +Wallis and Futuna +Islands). + + +A first step in our investigation was to check if its collector, Arnoux, really visited +Wallis and Futuna +Islands. Louis Arnoux ( +1814–1867 +) was a marine physician and thus participated on several expeditions (Anonymous no date; +Serra-Tosio 1996 +). From +1842 to 1846 +he travelled as a young chief surgeon (less than 28 years old) on the circumnavigatory voyage of the corvette ‘ +Le Rhin’ +. That ship had to take over the ship ‘ +L’Allier’ +which was stationed in +New Zealand +. The logs of the corvette captain, Auguste Bérard, indicate that both +Wallis and Futuna +islands were visited between +June and July 1845 +just before traveling to +New Caledonia +in +September and October 1845 +. +Tonga +was visited from +29 May to 14 June 1845 +, chiefly Tongatapu from +7 to 14 June +. +Wallis +Island +(sometimes called Uvea +Island +) was visited from +18 June to 4 July 1845 +with a short trip to +Futuna +Island +(the later together with Alofi +Island +called Horn (or Horne) Islands) located about +135 miles +southwest of +Wallis +. Another MNHN-RA hand-written catalogue dated +1839–1864 +(page 99) indicated that Arnoux donated two + +Brachylophus + +specimens in +November 1846 +( +Fig. 2 +). One of these, that reported from the Horn Islands, must now be considered lost but the second (MNHN-RA 6809) clearly originated from +Tonga +(according to catalogue indications) and is referable to + +B. fasciatus + +(see +Table 2 +). + + + +FIGURE 2. +Hand-written 1839–1864 MNHN-RA catalogue indicating the two + +Brachylophus + +specimens donated by Arnoux in November 1846. No collection locality is provided. + + + +The donations by Louis Arnoux to the MNHN-RA collections are peculiar. They contain numerous specimens from Oceania with wrong localities and several nomenclatural problems have arisen from those mistakes. One of the most famous is + +Gymnodactylus arnouxii +Duméril, 1851 + +, collected by Arnoux and erroneously indicated as from +New Zealand +(where the species is absent), and which was considered as invalid despite its temporal priority over + +Nactus pelagicus +(Girard, 1857) + +, the valid binomen ( +ICZN 1991 +). A recent synthesis on Marquesas Islands specimens (Ineich in prep.) will show +New Zealand +endemic species indicated as from Marquesas Islands in Arnoux’s MNHN-RA collections. Most, if not all, of the specimens given by Arnoux to MNHN-RA have mixed localities. So even if the ‘ +Le Rhin +’ expedition went through +Wallis and Futuna +, there is a very high probability, given that the species has never again been reported from this island group, that the specimen reported as coming from there in Arnoux’ collection is in fact a specimen of + +B. fasciatus + +from +Tonga +. + + + +TABLE 2. +Details of the seven specimens of + +Brachylophus + +spp. in the MNHN-RA collections on April 2015 (note that actual tag numbers were not attributed chronologically). Old MNHN-RA catalogue tags (ca. 1864) of the seven available specimens were 1735–1740 and 1736a. Sex: F for female and M for male. Species: Bf for + +B. fasciatus + +and Bb for + +B. bulabula + +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
MNHN-RA present tagLocalitySexSpeciesCollector / dateOld catalogue numberDum. Bibr. ca. 1864 catal.
2371Not givenFBb +Second exped. Dumont d’Urville (1837– 1840) on +La Zélée +, coll. Le Guillou +1736Yes
2372TongatapuF?Bf +First expedition Dumont d’Urville (1826– 1829) on +L’Astrolabe +– coll. Quoy and Gaimard +1739Yes Specimen measured in Duméril & Bibron, 1837 page 229
5283FijiMBbFilhol (around 1875)1736aNo
6809TongatapuMBfArnoux (1845)1737Yes
6811NoFBb +Second exped. Dumont d’Urville on +La Zélée +(1837–1840), coll. Le Guillou +1735Yes
6812NoMBfNo1738Yes “Origin?”
6813TongatapuMBf +First exp. Dumont d’Urville on +L’Astrolabe +(1826–1829), coll. Quoy and Gaimard +1740Yes
+ + +MNHN-RA 2372 and 6813 were collected during the first voyage of the ship +L’Astrolabe +( +1826–1829 +) under the command of Jules Sébastien Dumont d’Urville with Jean René Constant Quoy as naturalist and physician and Joseph Paul Gaimard as naturalist and chief surgeon. That expedition visited both +Tonga +and +Fiji +but the two + +Brachylophus + +specimens they deposited in the MNHN-RA collections clearly indicate “Tongatabou” (Tongatapu) as the collection location. Both are typical + +Brachylophus fasciatus + +. The second expedition of Dumont d’Urville ( +1837–1840 +) was made with two ships, +La Zélée +(under command of Charles Hector Jacquinot with Elie Jean François Le Guillou as naturalist (entomologist) and chief surgeon) and +L’Astrolabe +(under command of Jules Sébastien Dumont d’Urville with Jacques Bernard Hombron as naturalist and chief surgeon). That second expedition visited +Samoa +(Upolu [Apia]), ‘Vavao’ (Vava’u Islands Group) and ‘Hapai’ (Ha’apai Group) in the north of +Tonga +, and +Fiji +for a long time, particularly a Fijian island called Pao +Island +. Pao corresponds to the current Bau +Island +near the large island of +Viti +Levu where no + +Brachylophus + +population occurs but the nearby island of Viwa (also visited by the expedition) is still occupied by a population of + +B. bulabula + +. Thus MNHN-RA 2371 and MNHN-RA 6811, specimens from that expedition, could have originated from Viwa +Island +in +Fiji +. Both were collected by Le Guillou during the second voyage of Dumont d’Urville but are without reported collection locality. However, both Le Guillou specimens are females of + +B. bulabula + +and thus clearly originated from +Fiji +and not +Tonga +. + + + +Is the +holotype +of + +Brachylophus fasciatus +( +Brongniart, 1800 +) + +in MNHN-RA collections? + +MNHN-RA 6812 (the only specimen without data) is the most likely candidate to be the +holotype +of +Brongniart (1800) +. It is clear that +Duméril and Bibron (1837) +did not have the specimen at hand and that later ( +Duméril & Duméril 1851 +) they did not know that this specimen was the +holotype +when writing their catalogue. The lizard arrived in the MNHN-RA collections after Brongniart’s death in 1847 without any data, not even Oceania. It was first reported in the collections when included in the 1851 catalogue ( +Duméril & Duméril 1851 +). Size ( +70 mm +total length; see +Table 3 +) and, most importantly, the atypical dorsal pattern with the interrupted second lighter saddle-like dorsal band ( +Figs. 3–4 +) are in total agreement with the descriptions of +Brongniart (1800 +; +1805 +) and +Daudin (1802) +. MNHN-RA 6812 is a typical specimen of + +Brachylophus fasciatus + +and, thus, it appears to be the one collected by Riche in Tongatapu in 1793 and described and figured in +Brongniart (1800 +; +1805 +). The journey made by that expedition shows without doubt that the +type +locality of + +Brachylophus fasciatus + +has to be located in +Tonga +, on Tongatapu +Island +as indicated in the original description and not somewhere in +Fiji +, which was not visited by the expedition. Its coloration pattern today (lighter head spots) does not totally fit with the plates of +Brongniart (1800 +; +1805 +), but differences are due to fading after more than 220 years in preservative, with some lighter spots disappearing ( +Figs. 1 +, +5 +), but also to the engraver who probably did not consider the position and number of the spots as important. We also checked the engraving with the opposite right side of the +type +specimen in the case engraving was mirrored but this seems not to be the case and differences were even greater. The abnormal mid-dorsal light band undoubtedly confirms MNHN-RA 6812 as the +holotype +described by +Brongniart (1800) +. The specimen has 102 spines on its dorsal crest from above cloaca to the neck, thus being a typical + +B. fasciatus + +. + + + +FIGURE 3. +Left lateral view of MNHN-RA 6812 showing its saddle-like dorsal band and its complete accordance with the specimen illustrated in Fig. 1 above. + + + + +FIGURE 4. +Mid-dorsal photograph of MNHN-RA 6812 illustrating saddle-like second dorsal band instead of a complete band. Large nuchal white spots also present in this photo. + + + + +FIGURE 5. +Left side of head and neck of the specimen illustrated in Brongniart (1805) (left) and MNHN-RA 6812 (right) showing bicolored head, with white throat containing grey spots. Also nuchal white spotting is typical of + +Brachylophus fasciatus + +and obvious in the illustration of the holotype. Note, however, that engraver has not fully respected the disposition and number of the lateral dark and light head marks. + + + + +TABLE 3. +Snout-vent length (SVL), tail length (TL) and total length of the seven available MNHN-RA specimens. ‘Pattern fitting illustration’ indicated if the colour pattern of the specimen does fit that of the type illustrated in Brongniart (1800; 1805). Species: Bf for + +B. fasciatus + +and Bb for + +B. bulabula + +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
MNHN-RA SpeciesSVLTLTotal lengthPattern fitting illustration
2371 Bb17.36.5+(reg.)/No
2372 Bf19.253.572.7No
5283 Bb14.542.567No
6809 Bf1651.967.9No
6811 Bb15.733.549.2No
6812 Bf1753.870.8More-or-less
6813 Bf16.248.464.6No
+ +Conclusion + +Even if the lighter spot marks on the head of the +holotype +figured in +Brongniart (1800 +, +1805 +) do not fully correspond to those observed on MNHN-RA 6812 after more than 220 years in preservative, its size, acquisition date in the MNHN-RA collections and presence of the mid-dorsal atypical light saddle-like band pattern indicate that MNHN-RA 6812 is the +holotype +by monotypy of + +Iguana fasciata +Brongniart, 1800 + +, a specimen considered as lost for over 200 years. Its collection locality is Tongatapu. The lost specimen reported from Horn Islands ( +Wallis and Futuna +Islands) and collected by Louis Arnoux clearly represents an error in locality, even if the expedition visited those islands for more than two weeks. A recent field trip by one of us (II) to +Wallis and Futuna +Islands confirmed the absence of the species which was totally unknown by all local inhabitants questioned (see also +Gill 1985 +). Thus, even if the specimen is lost or was destroyed, we consider the report of + +Brachylophus + +from the Horn Islands based on Arnoux’s specimen as an error and this should be removed from future discussions of their natural range. + + +Our results show that museums have not given up all their secrets. They contain critical data for coming generations and have to be considered with care. Even if younger generations of zoologists refer to the web to obtain some of their data, direct examination of older specimens and their associated documentation often allows a more precise view of species definitions ( +Ceriaco & Bour 2012 +; + +Cardwell +et al. +2013 + +; +Troncoso-Palacios & Garin 2013 +). Now that records of most zoological collections are open-access on the web, the accuracy of such information must be verified before acceptance. Among the seven + +Brachylophus + +of MNHN-RA collections, one was an unidentified, very important historical +holotype +and another had an incorrect locality, which was repeated in publications for a long time. Our results also show that data attached to museum specimens have to be critically considered as they may also be incorrect, sometimes impacting conservation decisions. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/45/DF/3745DF30A3D9B3552A770CAAA7F68905.xml b/data/37/45/DF/3745DF30A3D9B3552A770CAAA7F68905.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4d02b725052 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/45/DF/3745DF30A3D9B3552A770CAAA7F68905.xml @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Cricetidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +955 +1189 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + + +Mesocricetus auratus +(Waterhouse 1839) + + + + + + + +[Cricetus] auratus +Waterhouse 1839 + +, +Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1839: 57 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +Syria +, +Aleppo +. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Golden Hamster +. + + + + +Distribution: +Vicinity of type locality and SE +Turkey +. + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +– Endangered. + + + + +Discussion: +Lyman and O’Brien (1977) discussed the geographic range of + +auratus + +and evidence for segregating it from + +M. brandti + +; also see Kryštufek and Vohralík (2001). Based upon chromosomal data, Doğramaci et al. (1994 +b +) recorded + +M. auratus + +from SE +Turkey +, and Yiğit et al. (2000 +b +) later identified only one sample from +10 km +E +Kilis Prov. +, SE +Turkey +, after intensive survey efforts. They recorded + +M. brandti + +from throughout +Turkey +and contrasted its morphology and chromosomes (2n = 42, FN = 82 and 84) with those of + +M. auratus + +(2n = 44, FN = 82). +Adler (1948) +and +Murphy (1985) +recorded the origin of the laboratory stocks of + +M. auratus + +and history of their distributions to various laboratories in +France +, +India +, and the +United States +. Coronary arteries are described by +Sans-Coma et al. (1993) +and infraorbital glands by Kühnel (1983). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/46/01/3746015174E4113FC6722240AF35AE71.xml b/data/37/46/01/3746015174E4113FC6722240AF35AE71.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..57b045f6ed6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/46/01/3746015174E4113FC6722240AF35AE71.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Ctenomyidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +1560 +1570 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + + +Ctenomys yolandae +Contreras and Berry 1984 + + + + + + + +Ctenomys yolandae +Contreras and Berry 1984 + +, +Resumenes VII Jornadas Argentinas Zoologia, Mar del Plata: 75 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +Argentina +, +Santa Fe Prov. +, Las Palmas ( +29o25’S +, +59o40’W +). + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Yolanda's Tuco-tuco +. + + + + +Distribution: +Along the +Paraná +and San Javier Rivers, +Santa Fe Prov. + + + + +Discussion: +Not recognized by +Redford and Eisenberg (1992) +but listed by +Galliari et al. (1996) +. Karyotype has 2n=50 and FN=78 and shares several chromosomal characteristics with + +rionegrensis +( +Ortells et al. 1990 +) + +. Distinct in both penial ( +Balbontin et al., 1996 +) and sperm morphology ( +Vitullo et al., 1988 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/46/18/374618679B43FF9151EAFF2BC686F839.xml b/data/37/46/18/374618679B43FF9151EAFF2BC686F839.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bea19d55d94 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/46/18/374618679B43FF9151EAFF2BC686F839.xml @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@ + + + +Three new species of eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) infesting fruit yielding plants from India + + + +Author + +Chakrabarti, Samiran + + + +Author + +Sarkar, Sanjay + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2988 + + +28 +36 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.203722 +19cefe98-f1c4-4195-8c75-a569a38cd223 +1175-5326 +203722 + + + + + + + +Tegonotus fisus + +n. sp. + + + + +( +Figs.11–16 +.) + + + + +Diagnosis. +This species is distinguished by the following combination of characters: numerous irregular broken lines on prodorsal shield, frontal lobe of prodorsal shield has clear median and admedian lines, bifurcated dorsal pedipalp genual setae +d +, scapular tubercles much ahead of the posterior shield margin, seta on tibia I absent, 4 rayed, tarsal empodium, presence of two +types +of ventral annuli i.e. first 14–16 ventral annuli with microtubercles and rest of the ventral annuli with microstriations, both the coxae smooth, proximal region of female genitalia has small striations, two horn like lateral projections emerge from mid lateral margin of epigynium. + + + + +FEMALE +(n=10): Body 169.9 (165.4–169.9) long, 56.0 (55.2–56.0) wide. +Gnathosoma +23.3 (22.3–23.3) long, curved down, dorsal pedipalp genual seta +d +bifurcated and 9.3 (9.1–9.3). +Prodorsal shield +65.3 (64.8–65.3) long, 56.0 (55.2–56.0) wide with a prominent shield lobe of 19.6 (18.6–19.6) long over the base of gnathosoma, frontal shield lobe triangular, with distinct median and admedian lines and numerous broken lines; prodorsal shield shows granulations and a prominent ‘V’ shaped mark extended from anterior shield margin up to middle encompassing prominent median line, faint impressions of median and admedian lines are found below the ‘V’ mark, numerous broken lines are also found at two lateral sides of prodorsal shield, near the base of each dorsal tubercle small semicircular arcs are found. Scapular tubercles 13.0 (12.6–13.0) conspicuous, ahead of rear shield margin and 26.1 (26.1–26.9) apart, scapular seta +sc +2.8 (2.1–2.8) and directed upward and centrad. +Leg I +from base of trochanter 25.2 (24.2–25.2); femur 10.2 (10.2–11.2), basiventral femoral seta +bv +9.3 (8.9–9.3); genu 3.7 (3.7–4.2) with antaxial genual seta +1 +ʺ 28.0 (27.0–28.0); tibia 6.5 (5.6–6.5) without paraxial tibial seta +1 +ʹ; tarsus 4.6 (3.7–4.6); two identical tarsal setae-paraxial fastigial tarsal setae +ft +ʹ and antaxial fastigial tarsal seta +ft +ʺ 14.0 (11.3–14.0); paraxial unguinal tarsal seta +u +ʹ 3.7 (2.6–3.7), tarsal solenidion ω curved, knobbed and 4.6 (3.7–4.6), 4 rayed, tarsal empodium em 3.7 (3.7–4.4). +Leg II +from base of trochanter 24.2 (23.2–24.2); femur 10.2 (10.2–11.2), basiventral femoral seta +bv +9.3 (8.9–9.3), genu 3.7 (3.7–4.2) with antaxial genual seta +1 +ʺ 28.0 (27.0–28.0); tibia 5.6 (4.5–5.6) without paraxial tibial seta +1 +ʹ; tarsus 3.7 (3.7–4.2) with two identical tarsal setae-paraxial fastigial tarsal setae +ft +ʹ and antaxial fastigial tarsal seta +ft +ʺ 14.0 (11.3–14.0), paraxial unguinal tarsal seta +u +ʹ 2.8 (2.1–2.8), tarsal solenidion ω curved, knobbed and 4.6 (4.1–4.6); 4 rayed, tarsal empodium em 3.7 (3.7–4.4). Coxae I 18.6 (17.5–18.6) long, smooth and contiguous with a mid sternal line, seta +1b +6.5 (5.6–6.5) and 5.9 (5.1–5.9) apart; +1a +tubercles with seta present a little ahead of line across the +2a +tubercles; seta +1a +14.0 (13.0–14.0) and 6.9 (6.1–6.9) apart, the distance between setae +1a +and +1b +is 6.2 (6.2–6.4); coxa II smooth, 13.0 (13.0–13.8), seta +2a +29.8 (28.8–29.8) and 23.6 (22.8–23.6) apart. +Opisthosoma +with 29 (28–29) smooth dorsal annuli and 56 (56–57) narrow ventral annuli, micro tubercles rounded and located on first 15 (14–16) ventral annuli; rest of the ventral annuli starting from posterior margin of genitalia up to last ventral annulus have microstriations, seta +c2 +15.8 (14.9–15.8) on annulus 15 (14–15), seta +d +52.2 (52.2–53.2) on annulus 23 (23–24); seta + +e +4.6 + +(4.6–5.6) on ventral annulus 29 (28–29); seta +f +14.0 (14.0–14.9) on ventral annulus 49 (48–49); seta +h1 +absent, seta +h2 +42.0 (42.0–43.2). +Epigynium +16.8 (16.8– 17.5) long, 19.6 (19.6–21.1) wide; smooth except small striations at anterior margin, two horn like lateral projections emerge from mid lateral margin of epigynium; seta +3a +12.1 (10.2–12.1). + + +MALE. +Not observed. + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +: Female (marked) on slide (no.1378/91/2006), +India +: West Bengal: Malda, Amriti, Latitude: 24°20ʹ38ʺ N and Longitude: 87°05ʹ29ʺ E, +24 December +, 2006 from + +Mangifera indica + +(L.) ( +Anacardiaceae +), Coll. S. Sarkar. +Paratypes +: +8 females +on slide bearing +holotype +and +49 females +on 6 slides (nos. +1376- 1377 +/91/2006 and +1379-1382 +/91/2006); collection data same as in +holotype +. + + +Relation to host. +Pinkish brown, fusiform mites are vagrants on the undersurface of the leaves. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet ‘ + +fisus + +’, a Latin word, meaning split, and refers to the bifurcate dorsal pedipalp genual seta. + + + + +Remarks. +The new species resembles + +T. schleicherae +Ghosh & Chakrabarti, 1985 + +, + +T. ferrugeniae +Mohanasundaram, 1985 + +, + +T. tricarinatus +Fletchmann, +1996 + +in having 4 rayed tarsal empodium and scapular tubercles much above the shield margin. However, it differs from + +T. schleicherae + +by not having granulated prodorsal shield, from + +T. ferrugeniae + +by not having lateral spine of dorsal annuli and from + +T. tricarinatus + +in overall prodorsal shield structure, shorter setae +3a +and smooth coxae. The new species also closely resembles + +T. convolvuli +(Channabasavanna, 1966) + +in location of scapular seta well ahead of rear margin of prodorsal shield and having 4 rayed tarsal empodium but differs from it by having numerous irregular broken lines on prodorsal shield besides bifurcated dorsal pedipalp genual setae and not having seta on tibia I. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/46/18/374618679B44FF9451EAF949C4B9F93E.xml b/data/37/46/18/374618679B44FF9451EAF949C4B9F93E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9e8c33c0543 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/46/18/374618679B44FF9451EAF949C4B9F93E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ + + + +Three new species of eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) infesting fruit yielding plants from India + + + +Author + +Chakrabarti, Samiran + + + +Author + +Sarkar, Sanjay + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2988 + + +28 +36 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.203722 +19cefe98-f1c4-4195-8c75-a569a38cd223 +1175-5326 +203722 + + + + + + + +Aculops spodiasis + +n. sp. + + + + +( +Figs. 1–6 +.) + + + + +Diagnosis. +This species is distinguished by the following combination of characters: scapular tubercles with setae located almost at posterior margin of prodorsal shield, presence of incomplete median line, non granular prodorsal shield margin, prodorsal shield shows symmetrical cells and lines, presence of 7 columnar cells at anterior margin of prodorsal shield, 5 rayed tarsal empodium, smooth dorsal annuli, +h1 +seta present, surface of coxa I ornamented with curved lines where as that of coxa II is almost smooth except two curved parallel lines at distal ends, +1b +tubercles with setae located ahead of anterior coxal approximation, epigynium is almost smooth except a median sinuate line. + + + + + +FIGURE 1−6. + +Aculops spondiasis + +n. sp. + +: +1. +Lateral view of the body; +2. +Dorsal view of prodorsal shield; +3. +Leg I; +4. +Leg II; +5. +Ventral view of coxal-genital region; +6. +Tarsal empodium with tarsal solenidion. + + + + +FEMALE +(n=10): Body 140.9 (139.8–140.9) long, 60.6 (58.3–61.2) wide. +Gnathosoma +17.2 (15.2–17.2) long, curved down, dorsal pedipalp genual seta +d +5.6 (5.3–5.9). +Prodorsal shield +40.1 (40.1–41.2) long, 56.0 (55.3–56.0) wide, nongranular and with an acuminate shield lobe; anterolateral region of prodorsal shield shows 7 columnar cells running parallel to each others, between the lateral margin of prodorsal shield and submedian line there are 2 cells of unequal size, median line incomplete and present only on rear end, two carinae from the admedian line meet the anterior tip of the median line, admedian lines complete, sinuate and connected with each others at two sites by transverse lines, the transverse connection between admedian line at middle region has two lateral extensions, submedian lines sinuate, diverge and bifurcate above the base of dorsal tubercles, dorsal tubercles almost on rear shield margin, scapular seta +sc +4.5 (4.5–5.6). +Leg I +from base of trochanter 43.8 (43.8–44.8); femur 10.2 (10.2–11.2), basiventral femoral seta +bv +11.2 (9.3–11.2); genu 5.6 (5.1–5.6), antaxial genual seta +1 +ʺ 14.9 (14.9–15.8); tibia 5.6 (5.6–6.5), paraxial tibial seta +1 +ʹ 3.7 (3.7–4.1); tarsus 6.5 (5.6–6.5); paraxial fastigial tarsal setae +ft +ʹ 17.7 (16.9–17.7), antaxial fastigial tarsal seta +ft +ʺ 14.0 (13.9–14.0); paraxial unguinal tarsal seta +u +ʹ 3.7 (3.7– 4.4), tarsal solenidion ω highly curved, knobbed and 7.4 (6.8–7.4), 5 rayed, tarsal empodium em 6.5 (5.6–6.5). +Leg II +from base of trochanter 40.1 (39.2–40.1); femur 9.3 (8.4–9.3), basiventral femoral seta +bv +5.6 (5.6–6.5), genu 4.5 (4.1–4.5), antaxial genual seta +1 +ʺ 9.3 (9.3–9.8); tibia 10.2 (9.8–10.2) without paraxial tibial seta +1 +ʹ; tarsus 6.5 (5.6– 6.5), paraxial fastigial tarsal setae +ft +ʹ 19.6 (18.4–19.6), antaxial fastigial tarsal seta +ft +ʺ absent, paraxial unguinal tarsal seta +u +ʹ 4.5 (4.1–4.5), tarsal solenidion ω strongly curved, knobbed and 7.4 (6.8–7.4); 5 rayed, tarsal empodium em 6.5 (6.5– 5.6). Coxae I 18.6 (17.9–18.6) and contiguous; coxal surface ornamented with curve lines; +1b +tubercles and seta present well above the sternal line; seta +1b +7.4 (7.4–8.4) and 10.1 (9.4–10.1) apart, +1a +tubercles with seta present a little ahead of line across the +2a +tubercles; seta +1a +13.0 (13.0–14.0) and 6.9 (6.9–7.3) apart; the distance between setae +1a +and +1b +is 8.1 (7.9–8.2); coxa II comparatively smooth except two curve lines along the anterior margin of coxae and 14.9 (14.0–14.9), seta +2a +39.2 (37.3–39.2) and 18.2 (17.2–18.2) apart. +Opisthosoma +with 39 (37–39) smooth dorsal annuli and 72 (70–72) ventral annuli; microtubercles rounded and located on first 63 annular lines; last 9 ventral annuli have microstriations, seta +c2 +30.8 (28.0–30.8) present on annulus 14 (13–14), seta +d +42.0 (41.0–42.0) on annulus 28 (28–29); seta + +e +27.0 + +(26.1–27.0) on ventral annulus 40 (38–40); seta +f +26.1 (25.9–26.1) on ventral annulus 61(59–62); seta +h1 +1.8 (1.2–1.8), seta +h2 +39.2 (39.2–37.3). +Epigynium +9.3 (8.4– 9.3) long, 14.9 (13.8–14.9) wide, smooth except a median sinuate line and semi circular in shape; seta +3a +22.4 (19.6–22.4). + + +MALE +: Not observed + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +: Female (marked) on slide (no. 1300/19/2006), +India +: West Bengal: Malda, Englishbazar, Latitude: 24°50ʹ40ʺ N and Longitude: 87°55ʹ50ʺ E, +23 June +, 2006 from + +Spondias pinnata +Kurz (Anacardiaceae) + +, Coll. S. Sarkar. +Paratypes +: +11 females +on slide bearing +holotype +and +42 females +on 5 slides (nos. +1301- 1305 +/85/2006); collection data same as in +holotype +. + + +Relation to host. +Light brown, fusiform mites are found as under surface leaf vagrants. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet derived from ‘ + +Spondias + +’ genus of the host plant. + + + + +Remarks. +The new species shows similarities with + +A. morindae +Ghosh & Chakrabarti, 1989 + +by having ornamented coxae, 5 rayed tarsal empodium, incomplete median line, and +1b +tubercles ahead of anterior coxal approximation, but differs from the latter by having smooth epigynium and in location of scapular tubercles. The new species also resembles + +A. privae +Mohanasundaram, 1980 + +by incomplete median line on prodorsal shield, ornamented coxae and presence of +h1 +setae but differs from the latter by its smooth prodorsal shield margin and dorsal annuli. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/46/18/374618679B46FF9251EAF88AC5DEF8F6.xml b/data/37/46/18/374618679B46FF9251EAF88AC5DEF8F6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..13f9e531478 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/46/18/374618679B46FF9251EAF88AC5DEF8F6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,264 @@ + + + +Three new species of eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) infesting fruit yielding plants from India + + + +Author + +Chakrabarti, Samiran + + + +Author + +Sarkar, Sanjay + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2988 + + +28 +36 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.203722 +19cefe98-f1c4-4195-8c75-a569a38cd223 +1175-5326 +203722 + + + + + + + +Phyllocoptruta citricola + +n. sp. + + + + +( +Figs. 7–10 +.) + + + + +Diagnosis. +This species is distinguished by the following combination of characters: prodorsal shield shows a median line at the cell formed between the dorsal tubercles by the admedians and V like cross-line, prodorsal shield lobe shows only admedian lines, direction of scapular setae upward and centrad, presence of seta +h1 +, 4 rayed, tarsal empodium, curved tarsal solenidion, 14 longitudinal scorings on epigynium and both coxal surface ornamented with wavy parallel lines. + + + + + +FIGURE 7−10. + +Phyllocoptruta citricola + +n. sp. + +: +7. +Dorsal view of the body +8. +Laterally dorsal view of the body; +9. +Ven t ral view of coxal-genital region; +10. +Tarsal empodium with tarsal solenidion. + + + + +FEMALE +(n=10): Body 113.8 (113.8–135.3) long, 63.4 (57.8–68.1) wide. +Gnathosoma +21.4 (21.4–22.4) long, evenly curved downward. Dorsal pedipalp genual seta +d +3.7 (3.2–3.7) and pedipalp coxal seta +ep +present. +Prodorsal shield +42.0 (42.0–42.9) long, 50.4 (50.4–54.14) wide with an anterior lobe overhanging gnathosoma; prodorsal shield design represents clear pattern of curved lines. Median line extends between the middle and posterior V like cross line of admedians; admedian lines wavy with three cross lines first one on 9.2, second one on 22.2 from anterior margin of prodorsal shield, and the third one on 4.7 from posterior margin of the prodorsal shield forming a V-shaped line, widely apart at middle forming an almost rhomboid shaped gap; submedian lines sinuate, extend from the anterior cross line of admedian up to the posterior shield margin touching the base of the scapular setae +sc +, submedian lines touch the admedian at middle. Dorsal tubercles ahead of rear shield margin, 25.2 apart; scapular seta +sc +5.6 (4.6–5.6) long, directed upward and centered. +Leg I +from base of trochanter 28.0 (28.0–28.9), femur 13.0 (12.1–13.0), basiventral femoral seta +bv +13.1 (12.8–13.1), genu 3.7 (3.7–4.6), antaxial genual seta +1 +ʺ 23.3 (22.4–24.2), tibia 4.6, paraxial tibial seta +1 +ʹ 4.6 (4.6–5.6), tarsus 5.6 (5.1–5.6), paraxial fastigial tarsal seta +ft +ʹ 14.9 (14.9–18.6), antaxial fastigial tarsal seta +ft +ʺ 25.2 (21.4–25.2), paraxial unguinal tarsal seta +u +ʹ 3.2 (3.2–3.7), tarsal empodium em 4.6 (4.1–4.6) and 4 rayed, tarsal solenidion ω knobbed, slightly curved and 6.5 (6.5–7.0). +Leg II +from base of trochanter 28.9 (28–28.9), femur 14.0 (13.0–14.0), basiventral femoral seta +bv +13.0 (12.1–13.0), genu 3.7 (3.7–4.6), antaxial genual seta +1 +ʺ 7.4 (7.4–8.4), tibia 3.7 (3.7–4.6); paraxial tibial seta +1 +' 5.6 (4.6–5.6); tarsus 5.6 (5.1–5.6), paraxial fastigial tarsal setae +ft +ʹ 10.2 (10.2–11.2), antaxial fastigial tarsal seta +ft +ʺ 23.3 (19.6–23.3), paraxial unguinal tarsal seta +u +ʹ 3.7 (3.2–3.7), 4-rayed, tarsal empodium em 4.7 (4.1–4.7), tarsal solenidion ω 6.5 (6.1–6.5). Coxae I contiguous, 11.2 (11.2–12.1) long, ornamented with parallel lines between seta +1b +and seta +1a +, seta +1b +4.6 (4.6–5.6) and 9.2 (9.2–9.8) apart, +1a +tubercles with seta a little ahead of the line between the +2a +tubercles; seta +1a +12.1 (12.1–13.2) long and 9.2 (9.2–9.8) apart; the distance between setae +1a +and +1b +is 4.8 (4,8–5.2); coxa II 12.1 (12.1–13.0) and ornamented with wavy parallel lines just below the setae +2a +, seta +2a +25.2 (25.2–28.9) long and 22.8 (21.2–22.8) apart. +Opisthosoma +with 36 (32–36) dorsal annuli with a broad dorsal trough, flanked on either side with ridges, ventral annuli 61 (61–64). Ventral annuli microtuberculated on anterior margin of annuli whereas dorsal annuli devoid of microtubercles, dorsal annuli broader and larger than ventral annuli, seta +c2 +14.0 (14.0–16.8) on annulus 11 (10–11), seta +d +48.5 (46.6–48.5) on ventral annulus 52 (23–25), seta + +e +4.6 + +(4.6–5.6) on ventral annulus 39 (39–40), seta +f +14.9 (14.0–14.9) on ventral annulus 57 (57–59), seta +h1 +4.6 (3.7–4.6), seta +h2 +43.8 (42.0–43.8); last 9 (9–13) annuli micro striated. +Epigynium +almost triangular in shape, 13.0 (13.0–15.8) long and 22.4 (20.5–22.4) wide, with 14 scorings, seta +3a +36.2 (29.8–39.2). + + +MALE +: Not observed. + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +: Female (marked) on slide (no.1434/85/2006), +India +: West Bengal: Dakshindinajpur, Doulatpur, Latitude: 25°10ʹ20ʺ N and Longitude: 88°14ʹ50ʺ E, +24 December +, 2006 from + +Citrus maxima +(Rutaceae) + +, Coll. S. Sarkar. +Paratypes +: +6 females +on slide bearing +holotype +and +72 females +on 7 slides (nos. +1435-1441 +/ 85/2006); collection data same as in +holotype +. + + +Relation to host. +White, spindle form mites are found as vagrants on undersurface of leaf showing yellow spots on leaf under surface. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet derived from ‘ + +Citrus + +’ genus of the host plant, ‘ +cola +’ from Latin ‘ + +Colus + +’ meaning dwelling in or inhabitant. + + + + +Remarks: +Among the species of this genus having 4 rayed tarsal empodium the new species comes close to + +P. daturae +Mohanasundaram & Ranganath, 1985 + +by longitudinal scorings on epigynium and to + +P +. +comorensis +Keifer, 1974 + +by curved tarsal solenidion and similar epigynium. However, the new species differs from +P. d a t u r a e +by having ornamented coxal surface, presence of +h1 +seta and dissimilar direction of scapular setae and from + +P +. +comorensis + +by dissimilar shield pattern and direction of scapular seta with tubercles. The new species also shows its closeness to + +Phyllocoptruta oleivora +(Ashmead, 1879) + +in sharing common host genus and by having similar body shape, opisthosomal trough, location and direction of scapular seta (upward and centrad), scoring on epigynium but differs from it by having 4 rayed tarsal empodium, presence of seta +h1 +, smooth basal area of epigynium and the prodorsal shield pattern. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/46/F6/3746F663349B535694C065B2317F1B0E.xml b/data/37/46/F6/3746F663349B535694C065B2317F1B0E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4a0b6ca8d7f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/46/F6/3746F663349B535694C065B2317F1B0E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ + + + +An updated checklist of the marine fish fauna of Redang Islands, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Du, Jianguo + + + +Author + +Loh, Kar-Hoe + + + +Author + +Hu, Wenjia + + + +Author + +Zheng, Xinqing + + + +Author + +Affendi, Yang Amri + + + +Author + +Ooi, Jillian Lean Sim + + + +Author + +Ma, Zhiyuan + + + +Author + +Rizman-Idid, Mohammed + + + +Author + +Chan, Albert Apollo + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2019 + +7 + + +47537 +47537 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e47537 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e47537 +1314-2828-7-e47537 +F940F7FD0A3541E98BDD33F83C2369D5 +AE1BE74780565E8D9B3522053F3B0983 + + + + +Ostorhinchus cyanosoma (Bleeker, 1853) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +occurrenceID: BDJ_12482_14; +Location: +country: +Malaysia +; locality: +Redang islands +; +Identification: +identifiedBy: +Loh KH and Du Jianguo + + + + +Notes + +Harborne et al. 2000 +; s: + +Apogon cyanosoma + +Yusuf et al. 2001 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/46/FA/3746FA1E7A9F253F5A40F1A9BC607ABE.xml b/data/37/46/FA/3746FA1E7A9F253F5A40F1A9BC607ABE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c39342fe95e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/46/FA/3746FA1E7A9F253F5A40F1A9BC607ABE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + +Illustrated type catalogue of Amphidromus Albers, 1850 in the Natural History Museum, London, and descriptions of two new species + + + +Author + +Sutcharit, Chirasak + + + +Author + +Ablett, Jonathan + + + +Author + +Tongkerd, Piyoros + + + +Author + +Naggs, Fred + + + +Author + +Panha, Somsak + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +492 + + +49 +105 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.492.8641 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.492.8641 +1313-2970-492-49 +334F0DAA1CD140F49B8CA62E4A97A732 +334F0DAA1CD140F49B8CA62E4A97A732 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Stylommatophora Camaenidae + + + +Amphidromus everetti connectens Fulton, 1896 + + + + +Amphidromus everetti var. connectens +Fulton, 1896a: 87, pl. 5, fig. 17 [= fig. 18 on the plate]. + + + +Type locality. +North Borneo. + + +Type material. +Lectotype NHMUK 1896.6.13.33 (Fig. 5J; H=43.1 mm, W=20.8 mm). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/47/73/3747735612D839E738EDF763769DC91A.xml b/data/37/47/73/3747735612D839E738EDF763769DC91A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4a68ea7ccb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/47/73/3747735612D839E738EDF763769DC91A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + + +A new diplommatinid genus and two new species from the Philippines (Gastropoda, Caenogastropoda, Cyclophoroidea) + + + +Author + +Pall-Gergely, Barna + + + +Author + +Hunyadi, Andras + + + +Author + +Asami, Takahiro + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +678 + + +1 +10 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.678.13059 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.678.13059 +1313-2970-678-1 +A386BBF10AD640AC99699548790B5B63 +A386BBF10AD640AC99699548790B5B63 + + + + + +Luzonocoptis antenna +Pall-Gergely +& Hunyadi + +sp. n. +Figures 1 +A-H +, 2 +A-F +, H + + + +Type material. + +Philippines, Luzon, Cagayan Province, 20 km south-southeast from Baggao, Barangay San Miguel, environment of the Duba Cave, limestone rock wall on the bank of the Pared River, 50 m, +17°49.967'N +, +121°56.042'E +, leg. Hunyadi, A., 07.01.2014., HNHM 99995 (holotype, H = 9.4 mm, D = 1.7 mm), HNHM 99997 (5 paratypes), HA/166 paratypes, PGB/3 paratypes. + + + +Figure 1. Shells of +Luzonocoptis +gen. n. species. +A-H +Luzonocoptis antenna +sp. n. ( +A-G +holotype HNHM 99995 H paratype HNHM 99997) +I-P +Luzonocoptis angulata +sp. n. ( +I-O +holotype HNHM 99996 P paratype HNHM 99998). Arrows indicate the inner, separate portion of the columellar lamella. All photos B. +Pall-Gergely +. + + + + +Type locality. + +Philippines, Luzon, Cagayan Province, 20 km south-southeast from Baggao, Barangay San Miguel, environment of the Duba Cave, limestone rock wall on the bank of the Pared River, 50 m, +17°49.967'N +, +121°56.042'E +. + + + +Diagnosis. +A tall, yellowish, very slender diplommatinid with club-shaped apex, dense, low ribs on the last whorl, rounded lower whorls, strongly expanded and reflected peristome that is strongly oblique to the shell axis, and a weak interrupted columellar lamella. + + +Description of the shell + +(Figs 1 +A-H +, 2F, H). Shell sinistral, tall, very slender; apex thickened; penultimate whorl wide, body whorl constricted, peristome strongly expanded; whorls 16.5-18; shell colour overall pale yellow or corneous, sometimes seemingly darker due to the desiccated body, subtranslucent; protoconch consists of approximately 1.25-1.5 whorls, finely pitted; first whorls of teleoconch conspicuously narrower than protoconch; teleoconch rather regularly, obliquely ribbed with fine spiral striation, which is most conspicuous on lower whorls; ribs straight on upper whorls but become more wavy on last whorl (especially near suture); upper whorls concave, slowly, rather regularly increasing; constriction deep, situated on penultimate whorl; last whorl conspicuously narrower than preceding whorl; lower whorls rounded; aperture strongly oblique to shell axis, rounded, with a weak columellar lamella visible from standard apertural view; columellar lamella low, interrupted, its inner, separate, blunt thorn-like part situated inside post-constriction bay (widened area just anterior to operculum); no other plicae or lamellae found; peristome overall strongly expanded and reflected; boundary between inner and outer peristome clearly visible due to sharp, usually reddish brown edge of inner peristome; outer peristome mostly responsible for expanded profile of peristome; upper, parietal part of peristome free from penultimate whorl; umbilicus absent. + + + +Measurements. +Shell height: 8.7-10.3 mm; shell width: 1.6-1.8 mm; aperture height: 2.2-2.7 mm (n = 6). + +Operculum (Figs 2 +A-D +). Corneous, flat (not concave); outer surface smooth, without any signs of whorls, but with a very thin matt layer; under matt layer glossy; inner surface overall rather smooth, with a very low arcuate ridge on one side, and a low central nipple, which is also visible from outside (because the operculum is semi-transparent). + +Radula (Fig. 2E). Radula taenioglossate. Teeth arranged in v-shaped rows, each transverse row with seven teeth (2-1-1-1-2). Rachidian tooth strongly constricted in its middle part, having five cusps (central cusp largest, blunt, other four cusps pointed); inner marginal and two outer marginal teeth have shallower constriction of plates, and are slightly longer and more slender than central tooth; inner marginal teeth with four pointed cusps, third one (counting from the side of rachidian tooth) is largest; outer marginal teeth with four pointed cusps. + + +Figure 2. Shells, operculum and radula of +Luzonocoptis +gen. n. species. +A-F +Luzonocoptis antenna +sp. n. A outer side of the operculum B inner surface of the operculum C SEM of the inner surface of the operculum D schematic drawing of the inner side, showing the slightly elevated ridge and the central nipple E radula (paratype no. 7.) F Neck region G Neck region of +Luzonocoptis angulata +sp. n. H protoconch of +Luzonocoptis antenna +sp. n. I protoconch of +Luzonocoptis angulata +sp. n. White arrow shows the constriction. All images B. +Pall-Gergely +. + + + + +Etymology. + +The shell shape of this new species (wide aperture, very slender upper whorls, and a club-shaped apex) resembles a radio +antenna +. The specific epithet +antenna +to be used as a noun in apposition. + + + +Habitat and distribution. + +Living specimens were found on a limestone rock wall. This species is known from the type locality only, which is situated ca. 34 km in a straight line from the type locality of +L. angulata +sp. n. + + + +Comparisons. + +Most sinistral diplommatinids from the Philippines belong to the genera +Palaina +and +Diancta +Martens, 1867, and have conical, ovoid, or cylindrical shells. However, most +Diplommatina +species from the Philippines are dextral, and the very few sinistral species have much lower spire, and triangular or ovoid shell shape ( +Zilch 1953 +). The only similar species in the region is +Luzonocoptis angulata +sp. n., which differs from +L. antenna +sp. n. in the following traits: whorls fewer; lower whorls keeled; aperture less oblique to the shell axis; peristome much less reflected; constriction situated approx. half whorl anteriorly (behind the parietal part of the peristome); ribs more widely-spaced on the neck region; inner, separated part of the columellar lamella blunter. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/47/7D/37477D49D164EC994F85517EB610E75F.xml b/data/37/47/7D/37477D49D164EC994F85517EB610E75F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aea9b1b1cc0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/47/7D/37477D49D164EC994F85517EB610E75F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ + + + +A revision of Dolichogenidea (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) with the second mediotergite broadly rectangular from Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Costa Rica + + + +Author + +Fernandez-Triana, Jose + + + +Author + +Boudreault, Caroline + + + +Author + +Dapkey, Tanya + + + +Author + +Alex Smith, M. + + + +Author + +Hallwachs, Winnie + + + +Author + +Janzen, Daniel + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +835 + + +87 +123 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.835.33440 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.835.33440 +1313-2970--87 +94548DD2704E459EAD8C48AE35D9EEA5 +94548DD2704E459EAD8C48AE35D9EEA5 + + + + +Dolichogenidea rogerblancoi Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault +sp. n. +Figs 7 +A-F +; 16A, B + + + +Holotype. +Female, Costa Rica, CNC. + + +Holotype voucher code. +DHJPAR0049840. + + +Holotype locality. + +Finca Esmeralda, 123 m, +10.93548N +, - +85.25314W +, Sector Rincon Rain Forest, ACG, Alajuela province, Costa Rica. + + + +Holotype verbatim labels. + +COSTA RICA: Alajuela, / ACG, Sector Rincon Rain Forest, / Finca Esmeralda, 123 m, / +10.93548N +, - +85.25314W +, / 06/24/2012 / DHJPAR0049840. + + + +Figure 7. +A-F +Dolichogenidea rogerblancoi +sp. n., holotype. A habitus, lateral B head, frontal C wings; D metasoma, lateral E metasoma, dorsal F head and mesosoma, dorsal. + + + + +Paratypes. + +Twelve female and four male specimens (CNC), the pin where one of the male specimens is mounted also has a gel capsule with a few additional (unmounted) specimens. All paratypes either from the same holotype locality or from Sendero Carmona, 670m, +10.87621N +, - +85.38632W +, Sector San Cristobal, Alajuela province. Voucher codes: DHJPAR0049206, DHJPAR0053702, DHJPAR0053756, 12 +-SRNP- +75869, 12 +-SRNP- +76060, 13 +-SRNP- +4390. + + + +Diagnosis. + +Dolichogenidea rogerblancoi +can be recognized by its black to brown metafemur, comparatively narrower T1 (usually with T1 L medially 2.0-3.0 +x +T1 posterior W), more quadrate T2 (T2 posterior W 1.6-2.1 +x +T2 L medially) and host being +Depressariidae +. +D. alejandromasisi +shares those features and is very similar morphologically, but it differs from +rogerblancoi +by having longer F1 L, relatively more quadrate T2 (T2 posterior W 1.3-1.9 +x +T2 L medially) and relatively narrower pterostigma. The two species parasitize different hosts (although in the same genus +Antaeotricha +), but +rogerblancoi +tends to be found at lower altitudes. + + + +Description. +Body color: head and mesosoma black, metasoma black to dark brown; palpi, metatibial spines, tegula and most of humeral complex white-yellow; legs mostly orange-yellow, except for mesofemur (with small dark brown spots), metafemur (mostly brown), and apical 0.1-0.2 of metatibia and metatarsus brown; wing venation mostly white or transparent, except for fore wing veins R1, r, 2RS and 2M which are light brown, pterostigma mostly brown but with small light spot at base. Anteromesoscutum mostly with setae and sculptured with punctures that do not fuse with each other; scutoscutellar sulcus relatively wide and with relatively deep crenulae; scutellar disc smooth and unsculptured, with isolated setae; propodeum mostly setose and with scattered punctures; propodeum areola partially defined on posterior half by longitudinal carinae, transverse carinae partially defined; T1 mostly smooth, with shallow and sparse punctures along lateral margins; T2+ smooth. Body L: 3.44 (2.73-3.84). Fore wing L: 3.41 (2.60-3.47). Ovipositor sheaths L: 2.94 (1.36-3.12). F1 L: 0.27 (0.18-0.29). F2 L: 0.26 (0.19-0.28). F2 W: 0.08 (0.06-0.08). F3 L: 0.26 (0.19-0.27). F14 L: 0.14 (0.10-0.14). F14 W: 0.06 (0.05-0.07). F15 L: 0.11 (0.08-0.12). F16 L: 0.14 (0.11-0.15). Head height: 0.58 (0.50-0.59). Head width: 0.77 (0.62-0.82). Eye height: 0.38 (0.32-0.40). Malar distance: 0.10 (0.09-0.12). Mandible W: 0.10 (0.08-0.11). Ocular ocellar line: 0.15 (0.13-0.15). Posterior ocellar line: 0.12 (0.10-0.12). Lateral ocellar line: 0.08 (0.05-0.08). Scutellar disc L: 0.34 (0.25-0.37). Scutellar disc W at anterior margin: 0.31 (0.20-0.29). T1 L: 0.65 (0.38-0.63). T1 W at anterior margin: 0.27 (0.22-0.32). T1 W at posterior margin: 0.26 (0.20-0.28). T1 maximum width: 0.28 (0.23-0.33). T2 L: 0.21 (0.14-0.22). T2 W at anterior margin: 0.27 (0.21-0.27). T2 W at posterior margin: 0.36 (0.29-0.38). Metafemur L: 0.98 (0.67-0.99). Metafemur W: 0.27 (0.17-0.27). Metatibia L: 1.22 (0.86-1.24). Metatibial inner spur L: 0.32 (0.22-0.34). Metatibial outer spur L: 0.18 (0.14-0.22). Metatarsus first segment L: 0.70 (0.48-0.73). Pterostigma L: 0.72 (0.54-0.71). Pterostigma W: 0.24 (0.19-0.25). Fore wing vein R1 L: 0.86 (0.68-0.88). Fore wing vein r L: 0.25 (0.17-0.26). Fore wing vein 2RS L: 0.20 (0.13-0.21). + + +Biology. + +Reared from +Antaeotricha +radicalisDHJ01 ( +Depressariidae +). This is the only species of +Dolichogenidea +known to parasitize that species of caterpillar in ACG, with 24 records out of 243 reared caterpillars of this species. It does not parasitize any of the other ACG species of the " +Antaeotricha radicalis +" species complex. + + + +Distribution. +Costa Rica, ACG, Sectores San Cristobal & Rincon Rain Forest, 123-670 m. Rain forest ecosystem. + + +Molecular data. +This species is represented in BOLD by 22 sequences belonging to BINBOLD:AAL2325. + + +Etymology. + +Dolichogenidea rogerblancoi +is dedicated to Roger Blanco Segura of Area de +Conservacion +Guanacaste, co-coordinator of ACG Research & Subdirector of ACG Area Silvestre Protegido, in recognition of his many decades of protection and biodevelopment of the forests occupied by this wasp. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFC1FFA7E731FAD7FC479517.xml b/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFC1FFA7E731FAD7FC479517.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..68d96e98a6c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFC1FFA7E731FAD7FC479517.xml @@ -0,0 +1,400 @@ + + + +Ophryotrocha (Dorvilleidae, Polychaeta, Annelida) from deep-sea hydrothermal vents, with the description of five new species + + + +Author + +Zhang, Dongsheng +43C40412-F966-4F97-860F-0D27D3AA214C +Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China. +dszhang@sio.org.cn + + + +Author + +Zhou, Yadong +E0F2089D-29B9-48A6-9761-73AB8D09D2A8 +Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China. +yadong_zhou@sio.org.cn + + + +Author + +Yen, Nicole +36958F99-FAE8-4FC8-A849-C011D0B4D26D +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +nyen@ucsd.edu + + + +Author + +Hiley, Avery S. +B39BA63A-DA66-4512-88E9-4A564D1BEB80 +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +ahiley@ucsd.edu + + + +Author + +Rouse, Greg W. +F4AAFAE4-85D9-44CA-8290-E0FC614E1983 +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +grouse@ucsd.edu + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2023 + +2023-04-24 + + +864 + + +167 +194 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2101 + +journal article +257216 +10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2101 +626b2920-1b64-469e-b3c9-73ff3612788c +2118-9773 +7867628 +326759FD-35B4-44C5-B3EF-9E89B6B91106 + + + + + + +Ophryotrocha pruittae + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +BE33115E-1B4C-405A-A425-AF518EE5E093 + + + +Fig. 8 + + + + + +Ophryotrocha +cf. +akessoni + +sp. 2 – + +Goffredi +et al. +2017 + +: supplemental, table 1. + + + + + +Etymology + + + +Named for Jessica Pruitt, an aficionada and expert on deep-sea + +Ophryotrocha + +. + + + + + +Material examined + + + + + +Holotype + +MEXICO +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); +Gulf of California +, +Alarcón Rise +, active hydrothermal vents; +23.377° N +, +108.531° W +; depth + +2309 m + +; + +22 Apr. 2015 + +; +Greg Rouse +leg.; collecting event: +ROV Doc Ricketts dive 754 +; GenBank: +OP311761 +(COI); +ICML-EMU-13288 +, (ex SIO-BIC A13689). + + + + + +Paratypes + +MEXICO +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for holotype; GenBank: +KY701728 +(16S), +OP311652 +(H3); +SIO-BIC A6322 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14123 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14124 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and most tissue used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14125 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14126 + + +• at least +4 specs +(1 fixed in formalin, 3 individuals and additional fragments fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14127 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14128 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14129 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14130 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14131 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14132 +. + + + + + + +Description + + + +In life, golden color ( +Fig. 8A +), opaque white after preservation. Body +10.5 mm +long, 50+ segments of similar width through the body. Eyes not visible. Prostomium rounded, wider than long, with paired digitiform antennae inserted dorsally, paired digitiform palps inserted ventral-laterally, similar in length with antennae. Peristomium two equal rings, similar size to the following segments ( +Fig. 8A +). Maxillae P-type, forceps comb-like, with large main large fang, fused together basally. Four rows of seven free denticles, the posterior most free denticles (D1) comb-like, similar to the forceps, other free denticles shovel-shaped with fine teeth, D2–D4 smaller than D5–D7 ( +Fig. 8B +). Mandibles heavily sclerotized, shafts rod-like, cutting plates L-shape, anterior edge flat with pointed lateral peaks weakly sclerotized, lateral wings weakly sclerotized ( +Fig. 8C +). + + + +Fig. 8. + +Ophryotrocha pruittae + +sp. nov. +A +. Dorsal view of living holotype (ICML-EMU-13288). +B +. Maxillae from paratype (SIO-BIC A14123). +C +. Mandibles from paratype (SIO-BIC A14123). +D +. Parapodium from paratype (SIO-BIC A6322). +E +. Simple supra-acicular chaetae from paratype (SIO- BIC A6322). +F +. Compound sub-acicular chaetae from paratype (SIO-BIC A6322). +G +. Simple subacicular chaetae of paratype (SIO-BIC A6322). + + + +Parapodia uniramous, acicular lobe triangular with a blunt point distally, dorsal cirri cirriform, long, extend beyond distal margin of acicular lobe, ventral cirri short and stubby ( +Fig. 8D +). Supra-acicular chaetae simple distally serrated, tapering into a large main fang, 2–5 per fascicle ( +Fig. 8D–E +). Five to eight compound sub-acicular chaetae, with serrated blades ( +Fig. 8D, F +). Sub-acicular chaetal lobe holds one or two simple chaetae ( +Fig. 8D, G +). Pygidium with two short conical cirri inserted laterally ( +Fig. 8A +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Only known from the Alarcón Rise vents in the southern Gulf of +California +at +2309 m +depth. + + + + + +Remarks + + + + +Ophryotrocha pruittae + +sp. nov. +was initially reported in + +Goffredi +et al. +(2017) + +as + +Ophryotrocha +cf. +akessoni + +sp. 2 with a partial DNA sequence for mitochondrial 16S rRNA lodged on GenBank (KY701727). + +Ophryotrocha pruittae + +has a rounded prostomium, two equal segments of peristomium, digitiform antennae and palps and P-type maxillae, which are all features found in the vent-clade of Clade B. It differs from these species by having the mandibles with the L-shape cutting plates and two conical anal cirri, while + +O. marinae + +sp. nov. +has triangular cutting plates and two digitiform anal cirri, + +O +. +akessoni + +/ + +O. +cf. +akessoni + +has curved cutting plates, + +O. charlottae + +sp. nov. +has subtriangular cutting plates and two lateral cirri and one median anal cirrus, + +O. kailae + +sp. nov. +has curved cutting plates and two digitiform anal cirri ( +Table 3 +). + +Ophryotrocha pruittae + +showed four rows of maxillae. As discussed above for + +O. charlottae + +and + +O. marinae + +it is possible that the outermost pair of rows represent molted jaws as has been observed in other + +Ophryotrocha + +by +Paxton (2004) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFC7FFA5E71EFB08FCCC929F.xml b/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFC7FFA5E71EFB08FCCC929F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..41208e0cfab --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFC7FFA5E71EFB08FCCC929F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,405 @@ + + + +Ophryotrocha (Dorvilleidae, Polychaeta, Annelida) from deep-sea hydrothermal vents, with the description of five new species + + + +Author + +Zhang, Dongsheng +43C40412-F966-4F97-860F-0D27D3AA214C +Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China. +dszhang@sio.org.cn + + + +Author + +Zhou, Yadong +E0F2089D-29B9-48A6-9761-73AB8D09D2A8 +Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China. +yadong_zhou@sio.org.cn + + + +Author + +Yen, Nicole +36958F99-FAE8-4FC8-A849-C011D0B4D26D +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +nyen@ucsd.edu + + + +Author + +Hiley, Avery S. +B39BA63A-DA66-4512-88E9-4A564D1BEB80 +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +ahiley@ucsd.edu + + + +Author + +Rouse, Greg W. +F4AAFAE4-85D9-44CA-8290-E0FC614E1983 +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +grouse@ucsd.edu + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2023 + +2023-04-24 + + +864 + + +167 +194 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2101 + +journal article +257216 +10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2101 +626b2920-1b64-469e-b3c9-73ff3612788c +2118-9773 +7867628 +326759FD-35B4-44C5-B3EF-9E89B6B91106 + + + + + + +Ophryotrocha bohnorum + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +181A86F6-7F8D-401C-B252-21FF39F6C5C0 + + + +Fig. 9 + + + + + +Etymology + + + + +Ophryotrocha bohnorum + +sp. nov. +is named for Jeffrey and Brenda Bohn and their family in recognition of their enduring support of deep-sea research. + + + + + +Material examined + + + + + +Holotype + +TONGA +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and a midbody piece used for DNA extraction); +Lau Back-Arc Basin +, +Southern Valu Fa Ridge, Hine Hina Vent Field +, active hydrothermal vents; +22.539° S +, +176.718° W +; depth + +1845–1906 m + +; + +22–23 May 2005 + +; +Greg Rouse +, +Fredrik Pleijel +and +Robert Vrijenhoek +leg.; collecting event: +ROV Jason II dive 146 +; GenBank: +OP311742 +(COI), +OP304895 +(16S), +OP311649 +(H3); +SIO-BIC A14092 +. + + + + + +Paratypes + +TONGA +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14094 + + +• +4 specs +(fixed in formalin); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14095 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and a midbody piece used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for holotype; GenBank: +OP311744 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14165 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and a midbody piece used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for holotype; GenBank: +OP311743 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14166 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same locality as for holotype; +22.532° S +, +176.719° W +; depth + +1818–1907 m + +; + +21–22 May 2005 + +; +Greg Rouse +, +Fredrik Pleijel +and +Robert Vrijenhoek +leg.; collecting event: +ROV Jason II dive 145 +; +SIO-BIC A14088 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for preceding; +SIO-BIC A14089 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for preceding; +SIO-BIC A14090 + + +• +3 specs +(fixed in formalin); same collection data as for preceding; +SIO-BIC A14091 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14093 +. + + + + + + +Description + + + +In life, white, yellow gut, with white eggs mid-body ( +Fig. 9A +), opaque white after preservation. Body +12 mm +long with 60+ segments, tapering slightly along body.Prostomium rounded, wider than long,with a slightly rise posteriorly in the middle. Paired antennae long cirriform, inserted dorsally, tapering distally. Paired palps cirriform, slightly shorter than antennae, inserted dorsal-laterally ( +Fig. 9A +). Peristomium two equal rings, similar in length to first chaetiger, slightly longer than following chaetigers, with two brown spots located dorsal-laterally between the two rings ( +Fig. 9A–B +). Maxillae P-type, maxillary carriers comb-like, with large main fang, 8 pairs of free denticles. Posterior 4 denticles (D1–D4) heavily sclerotized, with large main fang and sharp teeth; anterior 4 denticles (D5–D8) translucent, with a small main fang and tiny teeth, D5–D6 overlap with D3–D4 ( +Fig. 9C +). Mandibles transparent, rod-like shafts, cutting plates triangular, with blunt teeth on the anterior edge ( +Fig. 9D +). Parapodia uniramous, acicular lobe rounded with a small tip in the middle of the distal margin, dorsal cirri short, rounded lobes, ventral cirri long extending from distal margin of acicular lobe ( +Fig. 9E +). Supra-acicular chaetae simple, distally serrated, with a small hook on the tip ( +Fig. 9F +). Sub-acicular chaetae all compound, shafts bifid on the top, serrated blades with a small hook similar as supra-acicular chaetae on the tip ( +Fig. 9G +). Pygidium with two long digitiform cirri ( +Fig. 9A +). + + + + +Fig. 9. + +Ophryotrocha bohnorum + +sp. nov. +A +. Whole body of living paratype (SIO-BIC A14095). +B +. Dorsal view of anterior living holotype (SIO-BIC A14092) one of the distinctive brown spots on the peristomium indicated by white arrow. +C +. Mandibles of paratype (SIO-BIC A14093). +D +. Maxillae of paratype (SIO-BIC A14093). +E +. Parapodium of paratype (SIO-BIC A14093). +F +. Simple supra-acicular chaetae of paratype (SIO-BIC A14093). +G +. Compound sub-acicular chaetae of paratype (SIO-BIC A14093). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Only known from vents at the Lau Back-Arc Basin, southwest Pacific Ocean at depths of +1845–1907 m +. + + + + + +Remarks + + + +The phylogenetic results ( +Fig. 1 +) show that + +Ophryotrocha bohnorum + +sp. nov. +is most closely related to an undescribed species complex of + +Ophryotrocha + +( +O +. Seep4) from eastern Pacific methane seeps ( + +Thornhill +et al. +2012 + +). There is no morphological information available for these specimens. A clade comprising other eastern Pacific species, + +Ophryotrocha globopalpata + +from hydrothermal vents, + +O. flabella + +from a whale fall and +O +. Seep3 ( + +Thornhill +et al. +2012 + +), is then the well supported sister group to this clade. Based on this topology + +Ophryotrocha bohnorum + +appears to have independently colonized hydrothermal vents from + +O. globopalpata + +( +Fig. 1 +). + +Ophryotrocha bohnorum + +has hooked tips of the supra- and sub-acicular chaetae and red-brown spots located dorsal-laterally between two peristomial segments, features not seen in other species from hydrothermal vents. Only four species of + +Ophryotrocha + +, + +O. atlantica +Hilbig & Blake, 1991 + +, + +O. mediterranea +Martin Abello & Cartes, 1991 + +, + +O. pachysoma +Hilbig & Blake, 1991 + +, and + +O. socialis +Ockelmann & Åkesson, 1990 + +, have been described with chaetae with hooked tips. + +Ophryotrocha bohnorum + +can be easily distinguished from these species by its transparent mandibles with serrated anterior edge. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFD9FFBFE703F985FBA49488.xml b/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFD9FFBFE703F985FBA49488.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4526c10f611 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFD9FFBFE703F985FBA49488.xml @@ -0,0 +1,407 @@ + + + +Ophryotrocha (Dorvilleidae, Polychaeta, Annelida) from deep-sea hydrothermal vents, with the description of five new species + + + +Author + +Zhang, Dongsheng +43C40412-F966-4F97-860F-0D27D3AA214C +Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China. +dszhang@sio.org.cn + + + +Author + +Zhou, Yadong +E0F2089D-29B9-48A6-9761-73AB8D09D2A8 +Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China. +yadong_zhou@sio.org.cn + + + +Author + +Yen, Nicole +36958F99-FAE8-4FC8-A849-C011D0B4D26D +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +nyen@ucsd.edu + + + +Author + +Hiley, Avery S. +B39BA63A-DA66-4512-88E9-4A564D1BEB80 +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +ahiley@ucsd.edu + + + +Author + +Rouse, Greg W. +F4AAFAE4-85D9-44CA-8290-E0FC614E1983 +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +grouse@ucsd.edu + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2023 + +2023-04-24 + + +864 + + +167 +194 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2101 + +journal article +257216 +10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2101 +626b2920-1b64-469e-b3c9-73ff3612788c +2118-9773 +7867628 +326759FD-35B4-44C5-B3EF-9E89B6B91106 + + + + + + +Ophryotrocha charlottae + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +2AC55385-EA0C-41E5-8EAF-4D6F32818D94 + + + +Fig. 4 + + + + + +Etymology + + +Named in honor of Charlotte Seid, collection manager of the Benthic Invertebrate Collection at Scripps Oceanography, for her dedication to facilitating biodiversity research. + + + + +Material examined + + + + + +Holotype + +EAST PACIFIC OCEAN • +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); +Southern East Pacific Rise +, +northwest of Easter Island +, active hydrothermal vents; +23.823° S +, +115.456° W +; depth + +2649 m + +; + +2 Apr. 2005 + +; +Greg Rouse +, +Nerida Wilson +and +Robert Vrijenhoek +leg.; collecting event: +HOV Alvin dive 4097 +; GenBank: +OP311739 +(COI), +OP304893 +(16S), +OP311648 +(H3); +SIO-BIC A14096 +. + + + + + +Paratypes + +EAST PACIFIC OCEAN +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and midsection tissue used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for holotype; GenBank: +OP311741 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14163 + +• + +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and midsection tissue used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for holotype; GenBank: +OP311740 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14164 +. + + + +Other material + + + +EAST PACIFIC OCEAN +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and entirely used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for holotype; GenBank: +OP311738 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14097 + + +• +7 or more specs +(7 fixed in glutaraldehyde, additional material fixed in formalin and entirely used for slides of parapodia, additional tissue fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14098 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and midsection tissue used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14187 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14188 +. + + + + + +Fig. 4. + +Ophryotrocha charlottae + +sp. nov. +A +. Whole body of living holotype (SIO-BIC A14096). +B +. Maxillae of holotype (SIO-BIC A14096). +C +. Mandibles from holotype (SIO-BIC A14096). +D +. Parapodium of paratype (SIO-BIC A14098). +E +. Simple supra-acicular chaetae of paratype (SIO-BIC A14098). +F +. Compound sub-acicular chaetae of paratype (SIO-BIC A14098). +G +. Simple sub-acicular chaeta of paratype (SIO-BIC A14098). + + + + + +Description + + + +In life light brown ( +Fig. 4A +), opaque white after preservation. Body ~ +3 mm +long, with more than 35 segments of similar width, slightly tapering posteriorly ( +Fig. 4A +). Prostomium rounded, wider than long, with paired digitiform antennae inserted dorsally, paired digitiform palps inserted ventral-laterally, similar in length with antennae. Peristomium two equal rings, each similar in size to the following segments ( +Fig. 4A +). Eyes not visible. Maxillae P-type, forceps comb-like, with large main fang, fused together basally. Four rows of seven free denticles, the posterior-most free denticles (D1) comb-like, like the forceps, other free denticles (D2–D7) shovel-shaped with fine teeth ( +Fig. 4B +). Mandibles heavily sclerotized, shafts rod-like, cutting plates sub-triangular, lateral wings weakly sclerotized ( +Fig. 4C +). Parapodia uniramous, acicular lobe with rounded distal margin, dorsal cirri enlarged fusiform, similar in size with acicular lobe, reaching distal margin of acicular lobe, ventral cirri short and stubby ( +Fig. 4D +). Supra-acicular chaetae simple, distally serrated, tapering into a main fang ( +Fig. 4D–E +). Sub-acicular chaetae compound, hooked with serrated blades ( +Fig. 4D, F +). Sub-acicular chaetal lobe also with one or two simple chaetae ( +Fig. 4D, G +). Pygidium with two digitiform cirri inserted laterally, a small median papilla posteriorly placed ( +Fig. 4A +). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Known only from vents at +2649 m +depth near Easter Island (Rapa Nui) at the southern end of the East Pacific Rise (Pacific Antarctic Ridge). + + + + + +Remarks + + + + +Ophryotrocha charlottae + +sp. nov. +resembles + +O +. cf. +akessoni + +, which also occurs on the Southeast Pacific Ridge. They are similar in the shape of the prostomium, peristomium, antennae, palps, jaws, and chaetae. + +Ophryotrocha charlottae + +has distinctive parapodia with enlarged fusiform dorsal cirri, which easily distinguishes it from + +O. akessoni + +/ + +O +. cf. +akessoni + +, + +O. jiaolongi + +and + +O. marinae + +sp. nov. +Also, + +O +. +charlottae + +has two long digitiform anal cirri and a media papilla while + +O +. cf. +akessoni + +only has two short nub-like anal cirri ( +Fig. 3A +). + +Ophryotrocha kailae + +sp. nov. +is another species from southern end of the East Pacific Rise (Pacific Antarctic Ridge). It differs from + +O +. +charlottae + +in the form of antennae, palps, mandibles, dorsal cirri and pygidium ( +Fig. 5 +). + +Ophryotrocha charlottae + +can also be easily distinguished from other species of the “ + +akessoni + +” clade, based on mandibles and parapodia ( +Table 3 +). The four rows of maxillae found in + +O. charlottae + +differ from that in close relatives such as + +O. akessoni + +, + +O +. cf. +akessoni + +( +Fig. 3C +) and + +O. jiaolongi + +that show only two rows ( +Blake 1985 +; + +Zhang +et al. +2017 + +), but four rows were also observed in + +O. marinae + +and + +O. pruittae + +sp. nov. +(see below). It is possible that the outermost pair of rows represent molted jaws as has been observed in other + +Ophryotrocha + +by +Paxton (2004) +, so this should not be interpreted as diagnostic without further study. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFDBFFB9E77FFA21FBBC9494.xml b/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFDBFFB9E77FFA21FBBC9494.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..227ee1a3963 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFDBFFB9E77FFA21FBBC9494.xml @@ -0,0 +1,303 @@ + + + +Ophryotrocha (Dorvilleidae, Polychaeta, Annelida) from deep-sea hydrothermal vents, with the description of five new species + + + +Author + +Zhang, Dongsheng +43C40412-F966-4F97-860F-0D27D3AA214C +Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China. +dszhang@sio.org.cn + + + +Author + +Zhou, Yadong +E0F2089D-29B9-48A6-9761-73AB8D09D2A8 +Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China. +yadong_zhou@sio.org.cn + + + +Author + +Yen, Nicole +36958F99-FAE8-4FC8-A849-C011D0B4D26D +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +nyen@ucsd.edu + + + +Author + +Hiley, Avery S. +B39BA63A-DA66-4512-88E9-4A564D1BEB80 +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +ahiley@ucsd.edu + + + +Author + +Rouse, Greg W. +F4AAFAE4-85D9-44CA-8290-E0FC614E1983 +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +grouse@ucsd.edu + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2023 + +2023-04-24 + + +864 + + +167 +194 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2101 + +journal article +257216 +10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2101 +626b2920-1b64-469e-b3c9-73ff3612788c +2118-9773 +7867628 +326759FD-35B4-44C5-B3EF-9E89B6B91106 + + + + + + +Ophryotrocha +cf. +akessoni +Blake, 1985 + + + + + + +Fig. 3 + + + + + +Material examined + + + + +EAST PACIFIC OCEAN +• +6 specs +(5 fixed in formalin, 1 fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); Southern East Pacific Rise, +German Flats Vent Field +, active hydrothermal vents; +37.793° S +, +110.916° W +; depth + +2216 m + +; + +22 Mar. 2005 + +; +Greg Rouse +, +Nerida Wilson +and +Robert Vrijenhoek +leg.; collecting event: +HOV Alvin dive 4088 +; GenBank: +OP311735 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14105 + +• + +2 specs +(1 fixed in formalin, 1 fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for preceding; GenBank: +OP311736 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14106 + +• + +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); +Southern East Pacific Rise +, active hydrothermal vents; +31.151° S +, +111.932° W +; depth + +2237 m + +; + +29 Mar. 2005 + +; +Greg Rouse +, +Nerida Wilson +and +Robert Vrijenhoek +leg.; collecting event: +HOV Alvin dive 4094 +; GenBank: +OP311737 +(COI), +OP304892 +(16S), +OP311647 +(H3); +SIO-BIC A14107 +. + + + + + + +Description + + + +Body about +7.5 mm +in length and ~ 30 segments ( +Fig. 3A +). Prostomium rounded, wider than long, slightly rise medio-posteriorly, with paired digitiform antennae inserted dorsally, paired digitiform palps similar in length with antennae, inserted ventral-laterally ( +Fig. 3A +). Peristomium with two rings, subequal in length to the following segments, with ciliary band on each ring ( +Fig. 3A +). Mandibles heavily sclerotized, with rod-like shafts, curved shape cutting plates, with single blunt peak, lateral wings weakly sclerotized ( +Fig. 3B +). Maxillae P-type, forceps comb-like, with large main fang. Two rows of 7 free denticles, posterior most denticles (D1) comb-like, with smaller main fang. The other six denticles (D2–D7) small, shovel-shaped, with fine teeth ( +Fig. 3C +). Parapodia uniramous, with long dorsal cirri and short stubby ventral cirri, acicular lobes sub-triangular distally ( +Fig. 3D +). Supra-acicular chaetae simple, distally serrated, tapering into a main fang ( +Fig. 3D–E +). Sub-acicular chaetae compound, with serrated blades ( +Fig. 3F–G +). Sub-acicular chaetal lobe holds one simple chaeta ( +Fig. 3D, G +). Pygidium with two short nub-like papillae laterally ( +Fig. 3A +). + + + + + +Remarks + + + +The specimens were collected from two sites of hydrothermal vents on the southern East Pacific Rise, also known as the Pacific Antarctic Ridge. Though collected well south of the +type +locality, they agree with + +Ophryotrocha akessoni + +described from Galapagos Rift vents in most characters, though there are differences in jaw structure. +Blake (1985) +described a replacement of mandibles in + +O. akessoni + +from serrated cutting plates in juveniles to curved cutting plates in adults. In our specimens ( +Fig. 3B +), mandibles with curved cutting plates resemble the adult mandibles in + +O. akessoni +. + +Paxton (2004) +and + +Macnaughton +et al. +(2010) + +inferred that mandibles of a range of species of + +Ophryotrocha + +show basically adult size and shape of cutting plates since the larval stage, they only lengthen and enlarge their proximal shafts with maturity. It is possible that the juvenile mandibles in +Blake’s (1985) +original description of + +O. akessoni + +may belong to another + +Ophryotrocha + +. Furthermore, + +O. akessoni + +was described with a P-type tending to K-type maxillae, with lateral teeth on the forceps ( +Blake 1985 +). However, the forceps of K-type maxillae are unidentate or bidentate with the lateral dentition completely reduced ( +Paxton 2004 +; + +Macnaughton +et al. +2010 + +). Thus, according to the original description, it may be that + +O. akessoni + +has P-type maxillae as seen in our specimens ( +Fig. 3C +). +Blake (1985) +described the presence of two anal cirri but provided no further details or drawings. Our specimens had two short papillae which could correspond to those of Blake’s specimens, but examination of the +types +is needed. Based on the variation in morphological characters ( +Table 3 +) and the lack of any DNA sequences for + +O. akessoni + +from the +type +locality, we consider it prudent to report our specimens as + +O +. cf. +akessoni + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFDDFFA1E70DFC1DFDA39442.xml b/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFDDFFA1E70DFC1DFDA39442.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..57251d3d3dd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFDDFFA1E70DFC1DFDA39442.xml @@ -0,0 +1,854 @@ + + + +Ophryotrocha (Dorvilleidae, Polychaeta, Annelida) from deep-sea hydrothermal vents, with the description of five new species + + + +Author + +Zhang, Dongsheng +43C40412-F966-4F97-860F-0D27D3AA214C +Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China. +dszhang@sio.org.cn + + + +Author + +Zhou, Yadong +E0F2089D-29B9-48A6-9761-73AB8D09D2A8 +Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China. +yadong_zhou@sio.org.cn + + + +Author + +Yen, Nicole +36958F99-FAE8-4FC8-A849-C011D0B4D26D +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +nyen@ucsd.edu + + + +Author + +Hiley, Avery S. +B39BA63A-DA66-4512-88E9-4A564D1BEB80 +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +ahiley@ucsd.edu + + + +Author + +Rouse, Greg W. +F4AAFAE4-85D9-44CA-8290-E0FC614E1983 +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +grouse@ucsd.edu + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2023 + +2023-04-24 + + +864 + + +167 +194 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2101 + +journal article +257216 +10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2101 +626b2920-1b64-469e-b3c9-73ff3612788c +2118-9773 +7867628 +326759FD-35B4-44C5-B3EF-9E89B6B91106 + + + + + + +Ophryotrocha marinae + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +5B66661D-DDF9-425D-860F-412872058C27 + + + +Figs 6–7 + + + + + +Ophryotrocha +cf. +akessoni + +sp. 1 – + + +Goffredi +et al. +2017 + +: supplemental, table 1 + +. + + + + +Ophryotrocha +cf. +akessoni + +– + + +Salcedo +et al. +2019: 6 + + +, table 1. + + + + + + +Etymology + + + +Named in honor of Marina McCowin for her dedication in the study of the fauna associated with seeps and vents. Marina has studied +Siboglinidae +and + +Ophryotrocha marinae + +sp. nov. +was notable for being associated in large numbers with the tubes of + +Oasisia alvinae +Jones, 1985 + +( +Fig. 6A +). + + + + + +Material examined + + + + + +Holotype + +MEXICO +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); +Gulf of California +, +Pescadero Basin +, active hydrothermal vents; +23.960° N +, +108.863° W +; depth + +3676–3756 m + +; + +18 Apr. 2015 + +; +Greg Rouse +leg.; collecting event: +ROV Doc Ricketts dive 750 +(specimens associated with tubes of + +Oasisia alvinae + +); GenBank: +OP311750 +(COI);, +ICML-EMU-13289 +, (ex SIO-BIC A14109). + + + + + +Paratypes + +MEXICO +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for holotype; GenBank: +OP311749 +(COI), +KY701727 +(16S), +OP311651 +(H3); +SIO-BIC A6308 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for holotype; GenBank: +OP311755 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14108 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for holotype; GenBank: +OP311751 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14110 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14111 + + +• ca +35 specs +(10 fixed in formalin, ca 25 fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14112 + +. + +• +11 specs +(5 fixed in paraformaldehyde / glutaraldehyde, 6 fixed in ethanol); +Gulf of California +, +Pescadero Basin +, +Auka Vent Field, region of P Vent and Z Vent +; +23.96° N +, +108.86° W +; depth + +3648–3671 m + +; + +3 Nov. 2021 + +; +Greg Rouse +leg.; collecting event: +ROV SuBastian dive 475 +; GenBank: +OP561817 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14031 +. + + + +Other material + + + +MEXICO +• +7 specs +(3 fixed in formalin, 4 fixed in ethanol); +Gulf of California +, +Pescadero Basin, Auka Vent Field, Matterhorn area +, active hydrothermal vents; +23.95° N +, +108.86° W +; depth + +3650 m + +; + +14 Nov. 2018 + +; +Greg Rouse +and +Ekin Tilic +leg.; collecting event: +ROV SuBastian dive 193 +, sample S0193-S4 (suction sampler chamber 4, specimens associated with tubes of + +Oasisia alvinae + +); +SIO-BIC A9974 + + +• +7 specs +(2 fixed in formalin, 5 fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for preceding; +SIO-BIC A9975 + + +• +4 specs +(fixed in ethanol); same locality as for preceding; +23.95369° N +, +108.86231° W +; depth + +3668 m + +; + +29 Oct. 2021 + +; +Greg Rouse +leg.; collecting event: + +ROV SuBastia +n +dive 470 + +, sample S0470-S3 (suction sampler chamber 3, among tube worms); +SIO-BIC A13987 + + +• +2 specs +(1 anterior fragment fixed in ethanol, 1 anterior fixed in formalin and posterior fixed in ethanol and used for DNA extraction); +Gulf of California +, +Pescadero Basin +, +Auka Vent Field, Z Mound area +, active hydrothermal vents; +23.95616° N +, +108.86191° W +; depth + +3688 m + +; + +17 Nov. 2018 + +; +Greg Rouse +and +Ekin Tilic +leg.; collecting event: +ROV SuBastian dive 196 +, sample S0196-PC1 (push core 1 at microbial mat with venting); GenBank: +OP311752 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A9987 + + +• at least +15 specs +(3 fixed in formalin, 12 fixed in RNAlater, additional material fixed in ethanol); same locality as for preceding; +23.9561° N +, +108.8619° W +; depth + +3688 m + +; + +21 Nov. 2018 + +; +Greg Rouse +and +Ekin Tilic +leg.; collecting event: +ROV SuBastian dive 200 +, samples S0200-S1 and S0200-S2 (suction sampler chambers 1 and 2, microbial mat with venting); +SIO-BIC A10029 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for preceding; GenBank: +OP311753 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14114 + + +• +4 specs +(3 fixed in ethanol, 1 anterior fixed in formalin and posterior fixed in ethanol); +Gulf of California +, +Pescadero Basin +, +Auka Vent Field, oily mat site southeast of Z Vent +; +23.95° N +, +108.86° W +; depth + +3650–3662 m + +; + +5 Nov. 2021 + +; +Greg Rouse +leg.; collecting event: +ROV SuBastian dive 477 +; +SIO-BIC A14045 + + +• +7 specs +(6 fixed in paraformaldehyde, 1 fixed in ethanol); +Gulf of California +, +Pescadero Basin +, +midway between Auka and JaichMaa ‘ja’ag Vent Fields +; +23.95369° N +, +108.86231° W +; depth + +3663–3687 m + +; + +1 Nov. 2021 + +; +Greg Rouse +leg.; collecting event: +ROV SuBastian dive 473 +; +SIO-BIC A14007 + + +• +11 specs +(2 fixed in formalin, 9 fixed in ethanol); +Gulf of California +, +Pescadero Basin +, +JaichMaa ‘ja’ag Vent Field, Cavern Tay Ujaa (Big Cave +), active hydrothermal vents; +23.94157° N +, +108.85570° W +; depth + +3675 m + +; + +18 Nov. 2018 + +; +Greg Rouse +and +Ekin Tilic +leg.; collecting event: +ROV SuBastian dive 197 +, sample S0197-S6 (suction sampler chamber 6, +specimens +associated with small tubes of + +Oasisia alvinae + +); +SIO-BIC A10002 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for preceding; GenBank: +OP311754 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14113 + + +• ca +50 specs +(fixed in ethanol); +Gulf of California +, +Guaymas Basin +, sedimented hydrothermal vents; +27.016° N +, +111.410° W +; depth + +2012 m + +; + +13 Nov. 2009 + +; +Anna-Louise Reysenbach +leg.; collecting event: +HOV Alvin dive 4558 +; +SIO-BIC A14115 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for preceding; GenBank: +OP311756 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14116 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for preceding; GenBank: +OP311757 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14117 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for preceding; +SIO-BIC A14118 + + +• ca +15 specs +(fixed in ethanol); +Gulf of California +, +Guaymas Basin +, sedimented hydrothermal vents; +27.015° N +, +111.410° W +; depth + +2010 m + +; + +15 Nov. 2009 + +; +Anna-Louise Reysenbach +leg.; collecting event: +HOV Alvin dive 4560 +; +SIO-BIC A14119 + + +• +1 speci. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for preceding; GenBank: +OP311758 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14120 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for preceding; GenBank: +OP311759 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14121 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for preceding; GenBank: +OP311760 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14122 +. + + + + + +Fig. 6. + +Ophryotrocha marinae + +sp. nov. +A +. Numerous specimens associated with the tubes of + +Oasisia alvinae +Jones, 1985 (Vestimentifera) + +at active hydrothermal vents of the Pescadero Basin (Mexico). Image from ROV SuBastian dive S0495, courtesy of the Schmidt Ocean Institute. +B +. Numerous specimens associated with microbial mat on the seafloor at active hydrothermal vents adjacent to a large mass of + +Oasisia alvinae + +. Some of these were collected and formed lots (SIO-BIC A6308, A1408– 14112). Image from ROV Doc Ricketts dive 750 in the Pescadero Basin, courtesy of the Monterey Bay and Aquarium Research Institute. + + + + + +Description + + + +In life, golden color with white eggs mid-body ( +Fig. 7A–B +), opaque white after preservation. Body length +10.5 mm +, with 50+ segments, slightly dorso-ventrally compressed, widest anteriorly, gradually tapering posteriorly ( +Fig. 7A–B +). Prostomium rounded, wider than long, posterior medial area slightly raised, with paired digitiform antennae, tapering distally, inserted dorsally, paired digitiform palps similar in length with antennae, inserted ventral-laterally ( +Fig. 7A +). Peristomium with two rings, subequal in length to the following segments ( +Fig. 7A +). Eyes not visible. Mandibles heavily sclerotized, with rod-like shafts, sub-triangular shape cutting plates, with single blunt peak anteriorly, lateral wings weakly sclerotized ( +Fig. 7C +). Maxillae P-type, forceps comb-like, with large main fang. Four rows of free denticles, the posterior-most free denticles (D1) comb-like, like the forceps, other free denticles shovel-shaped with fine teeth, D2–D4 smaller than D5–D7 ( +Fig. 7D +). Parapodia uniramous, acicular lobe with rounded distal margin, dorsal cirri long digitiform, extending beyond distal margin of acicular lobe, ventral cirri short and stubby ( +Fig. 7E +). Supra-acicular chaetae simple, distally serrated, tapering into a main fang ( +Fig. 7F +). Sub-acicular chaetae compound, with serrated blades ( +Fig. 7G +). Sub-acicular chaetal lobe usually with one simple chaeta ( +Fig. 7H +). Pygidium with two digitiform cirri inserted laterally ( +Fig. 7A +). + + + + +Fig. 7. + +Ophryotrocha marinae + +sp. nov. +A +. Dorsal and ventral views of living paratype (SIO-BIC A14031). +B +. Whole specimens from paratype (SIO-BIC A14112). +C +. Mandibles of specimen from paratype (SIO- BIC A6308). +D +. Maxillae of specimen from paratype (SIO-BIC A6308). +E +. Parapodium of holotype (SIO-BIC A14109). +F +. Simple supra-acicular chaetae of holotype (SIO-BIC A14109). +G +. Compound sub-acicular chaetae of holotype (SIO-BIC A14109). +H +. Simple sub-acicular chaeta of paratype (SIO- BIC A14109). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Known from Gulf of +California +hydrothermal vents of the Pescadero Basin at over +3500 m +and the Guaymas Basin sedimented vents at ~ +2000 m +. Found in huge numbers on tubes of + +Oasisia + +( +Fig. 6A +), or on microbial mats near active flow ( +Fig. 6B +). + + + + + +Remarks + + + +This species was initially reported in + +Goffredi +et al. +(2017) + +as + +Ophryotrocha +cf. +akessoni + +sp. 1 with a partial DNA sequence for mitochondrial 16S rRNA lodged on GenBank (KY701727). + +Ophryotrocha marinae + +sp. nov. +most closely resembles + +Ophryotrocha jiaolongi + +described from hydrothermal vents of the Indian Ocean, including sharing distinctive mandibles that distinguish these two taxa from all other + +Ophryotrocha + +. Morphologically, + +O. marinae + +differs from + +O. jiaolongi + +based on body color, the form of antennae and palps, and in lacking a median pygidial papilla ( +Table 3 +). In life, + +O. marinae + +is golden while + +O. jiaolongi + +is white and translucent. + +Ophryotrocha marinae + +also has antennae and palps that are distally tapering and longer than the length of prostomium, while in + +O. jiaolongi + +antennae and palps are shorter than the length of prostomium. The minimum COI uncorrected distance obtained between + +O. marinae + +and + +O. jiaolongi + +specimens was relatively small at 3.73% ( +Table 2 +). Other relatively small distances that are currently known are up to 4.8% between + +O. notoglandulata +Pfannenstiel, 1972 + +and + +O. japonicus +Paxton and Åkesson, 2010 + +(both Japanese taxa) and 6.1% between + +O. flabella + +and + +O. globopalpata + +(both from deep waters of the eastern Pacific). Given the morphological differences between + +O. marinae + +and + +O. jiaolongi +, + +the reciprocal monophyly based on numerous COI sequences and vast geographic separation, we regard them here as separate species. One notable difference between + +O. jiaolongi + +and + +O. marinae + +was that the latter species showed four rows of maxillae compared to the two rows in + +O. jiaolongi + +found by + +Zhang +et al. +(2017) + +. As discussed above for + +O. charlottae + +sp. nov. +it is possible that the outermost pair of rows represent molted jaws as has been observed in other + +Ophryotrocha + +by +Paxton (2004) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFDFFFBDE73BF998FC20920C.xml b/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFDFFFBDE73BF998FC20920C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b8445179680 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/47/87/3747879FFFDFFFBDE73BF998FC20920C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,375 @@ + + + +Ophryotrocha (Dorvilleidae, Polychaeta, Annelida) from deep-sea hydrothermal vents, with the description of five new species + + + +Author + +Zhang, Dongsheng +43C40412-F966-4F97-860F-0D27D3AA214C +Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China. +dszhang@sio.org.cn + + + +Author + +Zhou, Yadong +E0F2089D-29B9-48A6-9761-73AB8D09D2A8 +Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, 310012, China. +yadong_zhou@sio.org.cn + + + +Author + +Yen, Nicole +36958F99-FAE8-4FC8-A849-C011D0B4D26D +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +nyen@ucsd.edu + + + +Author + +Hiley, Avery S. +B39BA63A-DA66-4512-88E9-4A564D1BEB80 +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +ahiley@ucsd.edu + + + +Author + +Rouse, Greg W. +F4AAFAE4-85D9-44CA-8290-E0FC614E1983 +Scripps Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 - 0202, USA. +grouse@ucsd.edu + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2023 + +2023-04-24 + + +864 + + +167 +194 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2101 + +journal article +257216 +10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2101 +626b2920-1b64-469e-b3c9-73ff3612788c +2118-9773 +7867628 +326759FD-35B4-44C5-B3EF-9E89B6B91106 + + + + + + +Ophryotrocha kailae + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +FC8AD84C-5C47-49D2-BEC4-55FC04F3DFBC + + + +Fig. 5 + + + + + +Etymology + + + +Named for Kaila Pearson, an expert on another group of vent and seep-associated polychaetes, phyllodocids belonging to + +Galapagomystides +Blake, 1985 + +. + + + + + +Material examined + + + + + +Holotype + +EAST PACIFIC OCEAN • +1 spec. +(anterior fixed in formalin, posterior fixed in ethanol and used for DNA extraction); +Southern East Pacific Rise +, active hydrothermal vents; +31.151° S +, +111.932° W +; depth + +2237 m + +; + +29 Mar. 2005 + +; +Greg Rouse +, +Nerida Wilson +and +Robert Vrijenhoek +leg.; collecting event: +HOV Alvin dive 4094 +; GenBank: +OP311745 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14100 +. + + + + + +Paratypes + +EAST PACIFIC OCEAN • +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); +Southern East Pacific Rise +, +Saguaro Vent Field +, active hydrothermal vents; +31.865° S +, +112.044° W +; depth + +2235 m + +; + +28 Mar. 2005 + +; +Greg Rouse +, +Nerida Wilson +and +Robert Vrijenhoek +leg.; collecting event: +HOV Alvin dive 4093 +; GenBank: +OP311748 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14099 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); +Southern East Pacific Rise +, +German Flats Vent Field +, active hydrothermal vents; +37.793° S +, +110.916° W +; depth + +2216 m + +; + +22 Mar. 2005 + +; +Greg Rouse +, +Nerida Wilson +, +Robert Vrijenhoek +leg.; collecting event: +HOV Alvin dive 4088 +; GenBank: +OP311746 +(COI), +OP304894 +(16S), +OP311650 +(H3); +SIO-BIC A14101 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in ethanol and the posterior end used for DNA extraction); same collection data as for holotype; GenBank: +OP311747 +(COI); +SIO-BIC A14102 + + +• +1 spec. +(fixed in formalin); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14103 + + +• +1 spec. +(anterior fixed in formalin, posterior fixed in ethanol); same collection data as for holotype; +SIO-BIC A14104 +. + + + + + + +Description + + + +In life, translucent with light yellow gut and white eggs mid-body, body opaque white after preservation. Body length ~ +4.5 mm +with more than 30 segments, similar width through the body, slightly tapering posteriorly ( +Fig. 5A +). Eyes not visible. Prostomium rounded, wider than long, with paired short digitiform antennae inserted dorsally, paired digitiform palps inserted ventral-laterally, similar in length with antennae. Peristomium two rings, similar in length to following segments ( +Fig. 5A +). Mandibles heavily sclerotized, shafts rod-like, cutting plates curved, with single blunt peak, lateral wings weakly sclerotized ( +Fig. 5B +). Maxillae P-type, forceps comb-like, with large main large fang. Two rows of 7 free denticles, posterior most free denticles (D1) comb-like, D2–D7 shovel-shaped ( +Fig. 5C +). Parapodia uniramous, acicular lobe with rounded distal margin, dorsal cirri subtriangular, barely extending beyond distal margin of acicular lobe, ventral cirri stubby ( +Fig. 5C +). Supra-acicular chaetae simple, distally serrated, tapering into a fang ( +Fig. 5D–E +). Sub-acicular chaetae compound, with serrated blades ( +Fig. 5D, F +). Sub-acicular chaetal lobe with one simple chaeta ( +Fig. 5D, G +). Pygidium with two anal cirri inserted laterally ( +Fig. 5A +inset). + + + + +Fig. 5. + +Ophryotrocha kailae + +sp. nov. +A +. Whole body of living holotype (SIO-BIC A14100); inset shows the posterior end of paratype (SIO-BIC A14099) with pygidial cirri. +B +. Mandibles of paratype (SIO-BIC A14099). +C +. Maxillae of paratype (SIO-BIC A14099). +D +. Parapodium of paratype (SIO-BIC A14102). +E +. Simple supra-acicular chaetae of paratype (SIO-BIC A14102). +F +. Compound sub-acicular chaetae of paratype (SIO-BIC A14102). +G. +Simple sub-acicular chaeta of paratype (SIO-BIC A14102). + + + + + +Distribution + + + +Known only from vents at +2216–2237 m +along the southern East Pacific Rise (Pacific Antarctic Ridge). + + + + + +Remarks + + + +While the DNA data suggests + +Ophryotrocha kailae + +sp. nov. +is most closely related to + +O. pruittae + +sp. nov. +( +Fig. 1 +), morphologically it resembles + +Ophryotrocha akessoni + +in having similar mandibles with curving cutting plates, which are otherwise not seen in the vent clade that also includes + +O. charlottae + +sp. nov. +, + +O. jiaolongi + +, + +O. marinae + +sp. nov. +and + +O. pruittae + +. + +Ophryotrocha kailae + +differs from + +O. akessoni + +in the form of its head appendages and possibly pygidial cirri ( +Table 3 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/47/FC/3747FCDE1A123B44B7AEF4B56C263F6D.xml b/data/37/47/FC/3747FCDE1A123B44B7AEF4B56C263F6D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..58247796a16 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/47/FC/3747FCDE1A123B44B7AEF4B56C263F6D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Braconidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Mark R. + + + +Author + +Godfray, H. Charles J. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8151 +8151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 +1314-2828--8151 + + + + +Coelinius Nees, 1818 + + + + +CHAENON +Curtis, 1829 + + +COPISURA +Schiodte +,1837 + + +COPIDURA +Foerster +,1862 + + + +Notes + +Griffiths (1964) +proposed that +Polemochartus +and +Coelinidea +should be included as subgenera of +Coelinius +. +Wharton and Austin (1991) +, +Wharton (1994) +and +Kula (2008) +supported the concept of an enlarged +Coelinius +but, pointing to intermediate taxa in the Oriental Region, argued against the retention of subgenera. +Achterberg (2014) +retains the three genera which is current European usage and is followed here pending a modern review of the group. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/48/0A/37480A676B7052988FABFD6749D6665E.xml b/data/37/48/0A/37480A676B7052988FABFD6749D6665E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a79adbf16f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/48/0A/37480A676B7052988FABFD6749D6665E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +An annotated checklist of the Pyralidae of the region of Murcia (Spain) with new records, distribution and biological data (Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea, Pyralidae) + + + +Author + +Garre, Manuel J. +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain + + + +Author + +Girdley, John +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-7439 +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain + + + +Author + +Guerrero, Juan J +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain + + + +Author + +Rubio, Rosa M. +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain + + + +Author + +Ortiz, Antonio S. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-6096 +Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain +aortiz@um.es + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2022 + +2022-03-14 + + +10 + + +79255 +79255 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e79255 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e79255 +1314-2828-10-e79255 +44791CDD66835E3193E35F81CF727998 + + + + +Ematheudes punctellus (Treitschke, 1833) + + + +Distribution +Mediterranean-Asiatic + + +Notes + +References: +Derra and Hacker (1982) +. Biological data: Bivoltine. Flight period: V-X. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/48/11/37481112D08BBF0DDDAFB5DCF240D8CF.xml b/data/37/48/11/37481112D08BBF0DDDAFB5DCF240D8CF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..70dcdb1f96b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/48/11/37481112D08BBF0DDDAFB5DCF240D8CF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Cryptus dianae Gravenhorst, 1829 + + + + +gracilicornis +Gravenhorst, 1829 + + +leucostomus +Gravenhorst, 1829 + + +stenogaster +Gravenhorst, 1829 + + +seticornis +(Ratzeburg, 1844, +Ichneumon +) + + +bolivari +Kriechbaumer, 1898 + + +solitarius +Habermehl, 1909 preocc. + + +solitarius +Habermehl, 1918 preocc. + + + +Distribution +England + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/48/C1/3748C1524BE9FAAA315CCB63B1772204.xml b/data/37/48/C1/3748C1524BE9FAAA315CCB63B1772204.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..131d082b799 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/48/C1/3748C1524BE9FAAA315CCB63B1772204.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Braconidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Mark R. + + + +Author + +Godfray, H. Charles J. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8151 +8151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 +1314-2828--8151 + + + + + +Cheloninae +Foerster +, 1863 + + + + + +ADELIINAE +Viereck, 1918 + + +ACAELIINAE +Viereck, 1918 + + +ACOELIINAE +Viereck, 1918 + + + +Notes + +The genus +Adelius +and related extralimital genera have usually been treated as comprising a separate subfamily, +Adeliinae +. Recent phylogenetic studies ( +Belshaw et al. 2000 +, +Belshaw and Quicke 2002 +) have placed the adeliines within the +Cheloninae +, as sister taxon to +Phanerotoma +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/49/16/374916EABE30341D62276B01F1FAB311.xml b/data/37/49/16/374916EABE30341D62276B01F1FAB311.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0cf77bb3c7e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/49/16/374916EABE30341D62276B01F1FAB311.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +A nomenclator of extant and fossil taxa of the Melanopsidae (Gastropoda, Cerithioidea) + + + +Author + +Neubauer, Thomas A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-9941 +Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria +thomas.neubauer@nhm-wien.ac.at + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +2016-07-05 + + +602 + + +1 +358 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 +1313-2970-602-1 +65EFA27673454AC69B78DBE7E98D6103 +FFA86D39FFE2FFF3FF8AFFEBC209FFDE +126863 + + + + +† +Amphimelania fuchsi Wenz, 1928 + + + +Original source. + +Wenz 1928a +: 119. + + + +Type horizon. +Late Pliocene to early Pleistocene. + + +Type locality. + +"Kalamaki" +[near Corinth], Greece. + + + +Remarks. + +Replacement name for +Paludina (Vivipara) ornata +Fuchs, 1877, non + +Vivipara ornata + +Neumayr, 1875, which was considered a +Melanopsidae +by +Wenz (1928a) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/49/D6/3749D65F74CFD0F109E74AA65C03B19A.xml b/data/37/49/D6/3749D65F74CFD0F109E74AA65C03B19A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f26682bad35 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/49/D6/3749D65F74CFD0F109E74AA65C03B19A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +Revision of the afrotropical species of Zaprionus (Diptera, Drosophilidae), with descriptions of two new species and notes on internal reproductive structures and immature stages + + + +Author + +Yassin, Amir +yassin@legs.cnrs-gif.fr + + + +Author + +David, Jean R. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2010 + +2010-07-23 + + +51 + + +33 +72 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.51.380 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.51.380 +1313-2970-51-33 +44A7F29ED3944B2D981F6C380B935950 +331EC652695364616735FFCCFFE6FF98 +576696 + + + + + +Zaprionus Zaprionus gabonicus +Yassin & David + + + + +Diagnosis. + +This species resembles +Zaprionus indianus +, but it can be distinguished from it by the small body size and the total lack of serration on the aedeagal flap ( +Fig. 12 +) + + + +Description. +♂. TL = 1.40 mm. + +Head. Arista with 3 dorsal and 2 ventral rays plus terminal fork; pedicel white, flagellomere I dark brown. Frons orange, sometimes with highly vestigial median +stripe +plus orbital stripes inwardly bordered with black; ocellar triangle concolorous with frons; hw:fw = 2.45, fw:fl = 0.85. Orbital setae in straight line; or1:or2:or3 = 1.1:1.0:1.2, orbito-index = 1.1, oc:or1 = 1.4, poc:oc = 0.7, iv:ov = 0.7. Face whitish yellow; carina broad and bulbous. Gena narrow; o:j = 10, o:ch = 4.9. Eye red. + +Thorax. Scutum brown, darker than frons, with 2 silvery white stripes. acs in 6 rows in front of adc; adc:pdc = 0.75. Scutellum darker than scutum, with black borders of the stripes expanded posteriorly; bsc:asc = 0.9. Pleura yellow; sterno-index = 0.44. Forefemur with 4-5 spines borne on warts on the anteroventral margin. Male basitarsus with a hairy brush. +Wing. Yellowish. C-index = 2.3, 4v-index = 1.4, 4c-index = 0.8, 5x-index = 1.0, M-index = 0.4, ac-index = 2.2, b/c = 0.6, C3 fringe = 52%, and WL = 2.7 mm. +Abdomen. Entirely yellow with deep dark spots at the bases of tergal setae. + +Terminalia +. Epandrium densely pubescent throughout its entire length; posterior margin pubescent at dorsal portion with 4 long setae; epandrial ventral lobe with 3 long setae. Surstylus quadrate with two rows of prensisetae. Cercus triangular laterally. Hypandrium densely pubescent at the lateral portion of the paraphyses. Aedeagus slender expanded apically without a hook-like appendix; aedeagal flap expanded and not serrated. Apodeme subequal in length to aedeagus. + +♀. TL = 1.34 mm, resembling male. +Terminalia. Oviscape not constricted ventrally, with 6 (rarely 7) peg-like and 6 short, marginal setae plus 4 supernumeraries. Spermatheca globulous and smooth, not wider than longer. +Egg. Elliptical with 4 equally long and fine filaments. +Larva. Escaping the culture medium when crowded. +Puparium. Horn-index 10.4. + + +Figure 13. +Male genitalia and spermatheca of +Zaprionus lachaisei +Yassin & David, sp. n. a, b, and +Zaprionus santomensis +Yassin & David, sp. n. c, d. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4B/5B/374B5B7B53A7777F6A4BC250C2B3E586.xml b/data/37/4B/5B/374B5B7B53A7777F6A4BC250C2B3E586.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..341a430b3a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4B/5B/374B5B7B53A7777F6A4BC250C2B3E586.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 1. Pteridophyta bis Caryophyllaceae (2 nd edition): Registerzuband 1 + + + +Author + +Hess, Hans Ernst + + + +Author + +Landolt, Elias + + + +Author + +Hirzel, Rosmarie + +text + +1972 +Birkhaeuser Verlag + + +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291815 + +book +291815 +10.5281/zenodo.291815 +3-7643-0843-5 + + + +<subSubSection id="BBBA01CB56391E306DA503A2B706E07D" pageId="null" pageNumber="358" type="nomenclature"> +<paragraph id="122C1C34682151600EDCC87650C363F4" pageId="null" pageNumber="358"> +<taxonomicName id="ABE615EBAA6E3B875E6081518823739B" ID-CoL="6HTPP" authority="(Hackel) Richter" class="Liliopsida" family="Poaceae" genus="Festuca" kingdom="Plantae" order="Poales" pageId="null" pageNumber="358" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="stenantha"> +Festuca +<normalizedToken id="E4436F9B268983C6B190558EA23B9B32" originalValue="stenántha" pageId="null" pageNumber="358">stenantha</normalizedToken> +(Hackel) Richter +</taxonomicName> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="CCB6739D1C9866EE3F878E2D2267F7A0" pageId="null" pageNumber="358" type="vernacular_names"> +<paragraph id="44EF70BD375382DBE1706A89B6FFAA82" pageId="null" pageNumber="358"> +<normalizedToken id="587B878E15B4ADA02239AF87D01DD218" originalValue="Schmalblütiger" pageId="null" pageNumber="358">Schmalbluetiger</normalizedToken> +Schwingel +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> + + + +Unterscheidet sich von + +F. Halleri + +(Nr.20a) durch folgende Merkmale: + +15-30 cm hoch; +Bluetenstand +3-6 cm lang; + +obere +Huellspelze +4,5-5,5 mm lang. - +Bluete +: Sommer. + + +Zytologische Angaben. +Keine Untersuchungen. + + +Standort. +Montan und subalpin (bis 1900 m). Kalkfelsen. + +Potentillo-Hieracietum +humilis Br. + +-Bl. 1933 ( + +Potentilla +caulescens- + +Ass. Br.-Bl. 1918). + + +Verbreitung. Ostalpen-Pflanze: +Von +Graubuenden +ostwaerts +bis Steiermark, +Kaernten +, Kroatien (Verbreitungskarte von Widder 1938). - Im Gebiet: Wenige Fundstellen in +Graubuenden +(z. B. Landwasserschlucht bei Davos, Nationalpark) und im Gebiet von Bormio (Valle del Braulio). + + + +Bemerkungen. +F. stenantha + +besiedelt andere Standorte als + +F. Halleri +; + +die beiden Arten sind aber sonst wohl nur an habituellen Merkmalen zu unterscheiden. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4C/45/374C451F45E61494D213DF8BF87CDE8D.xml b/data/37/4C/45/374C451F45E61494D213DF8BF87CDE8D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9828d51fcab --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4C/45/374C451F45E61494D213DF8BF87CDE8D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Sawflies, ' Symphyta' + + + +Author + +Liston, Andrew D. + + + +Author + +Knight, Guy T. + + + +Author + +Sheppard, David A. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1168 +1168 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 +1314-2828--1168 +3C3EC7B09BA145848E3E89CBBD28B432 +3C3EC7B09BA145848E3E89CBBD28B432 + + + + +Pristiphora (Lygaeonematus) saxesenii (Hartig, 1837) + + + + +Nematus saxesenii +Hartig, 1837 + + +Pristiphora thalenhorsti +Wong, 1975 + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4C/87/374C8789FFD61B622AA5F99146F1F79B.xml b/data/37/4C/87/374C8789FFD61B622AA5F99146F1F79B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8236925a5e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4C/87/374C8789FFD61B622AA5F99146F1F79B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,406 @@ + + + +A new species of genus Brithura Edwards from China, with notes on its internal reproductive system (Diptera: Tipulidae) + + + +Author + +Men, Qiulei +School of Life Sciences, Provincial Key Laboratory of the Biodiversity Study and Ecology Conservation in Southwest Anhui; Research Center of Aquatic Organism, Conservation and Water Ecosystem Restoration in Anhui Province, Anqing Normal University, Anqing, Anhui 246011, P. R. China + + + +Author + +Zhang, Zhongxin +School of Life Sciences, Provincial Key Laboratory of the Biodiversity Study and Ecology Conservation in Southwest Anhui; Research Center of Aquatic Organism, Conservation and Water Ecosystem Restoration in Anhui Province, Anqing Normal University, Anqing, Anhui 246011, P. R. China + + + +Author + +Liu, Qifei +State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops; Biological Control Research Institute, College of Plant Protection; Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, P. R. China + + + +Author + +Yang, Lei +School of Life Sciences, Provincial Key Laboratory of the Biodiversity Study and Ecology Conservation in Southwest Anhui; Research Center of Aquatic Organism, Conservation and Water Ecosystem Restoration in Anhui Province, Anqing Normal University, Anqing, Anhui 246011, P. R. China + + + +Author + +Liu, Weiguang +School of Life Sciences, Provincial Key Laboratory of the Biodiversity Study and Ecology Conservation in Southwest Anhui; Research Center of Aquatic Organism, Conservation and Water Ecosystem Restoration in Anhui Province, Anqing Normal University, Anqing, Anhui 246011, P. R. China + +text + + +Zoological Systematics + + +2019 + +44 + + +2 + + +158 +166 + + + +journal article +10.11865/zs.201911 +2095-6827 +5360762 +C832E687-CCA6-4712-BF6E-B18568EA2295 + + + + + + + +Brithura triprocessa +Men & Liu + +sp. nov. + +( +Figs 1–31 +) + + + + +Diagnosis. Antenna including flagellum yellow. Prescutum brown with three brownish-yellow stripes; pleura generally brown with a white stripe from the lateral region of pronotum to the base of wing. Femora yellow with broadly black tip. Tergite nine with lateral margins straight, shallowly emarginated at hind margin, a pair of horn-shaped processes inserted from the middle region. + +Description. Adult length. Male body +18.4–22.6 mm +(not including antenna, +n += 16), wing +19.2–22.6 mm +( +n += 16), antenna +4.1–4.6 mm +( +n +=16); female body +28.4–30.6 mm +(not including antenna, +n +=32), wing +20.2–25.4 mm +( +n +=32), antenna +4.5–4.8 mm +( +n += 32). + + +Head. Head brown with rostrum brown in coloration ( +Figs 1–3 +). Nasus light brown, cone in shape, densely covered with black setae ( +Fig. 3 +). Eye black. Occiput and vertex lacking of marking, mostly dark brown, narrowly margined with yellow along the eyes ( +Fig. 1 +). Vertical tubercle cone-shaped, dark brown, black apically ( +Fig. 1 +). Antenna 13-segmented, bent backward not reaching the base of haltere; scape brown, elongated, cylindrical, expanded apically; pedicel brown, very short; flagellum entirely yellow with the first flagellomere longest, the remaining segments generally shortened and thinned, base of each flagellomere enlarged with abundant black verticils, the verticils longer than the length of corresponding flagellomere; surface of flagellomere densely covered with short white setae ( +Fig. 1 +). Palpus dark brown ( +Fig. 3 +). + + + +Figures 1–8. + +Brithura triprocessa +Men & Liu + + +sp. nov. + +1. Head, dorsal view. 2. Thorax, dorsal view. 3. Thorax, lateral view. 4. Wing. 5. Abdomen, lateral view. 6. Hypopygium, lateral view. 7. Abdomen, lateral view. 8. Ovipositor, lateral view. + + + +Thorax. Pronotum black medially, dark brown laterally ( +Fig. 3 +). Prescutum brown with three brownish-yellow stripes, median one divided by a brown vitta, lateral stripes subequal in length to half of median one, rounded apically ( +Fig. 2 +). Scutum with two yellow markings connected to each other, the upper one triangular, the lower one oval, the latter at least two times longer than the former. Scutellum brown with yellow median line ( +Fig. 2 +). Postnotum wholly dark brown ( +Fig. 2 +). Pleura generally brown with a white stripe from the lateral region of pronotum to the root of wing, laterotergite basally suffused with white ( +Fig. 3 +). Leg stout, coxa and trochanter brown, the latter suffused with black apically; femur yellow with broadly black tip; tibia yellow at basal one fifth, the rest region yellowish-brown; tarsi yellowish-brown. Haltere with stem yellow, knob black. Wing light brown, cells c and sc darker than ground color; stigma dark brown, extending to the bases of cells r4, r5 and discal cell; a black spot at the origin of Rs; discal cell transparent, relatively short; wing tip suffused with slightly smoky gray on cells r3 and r4, with five light spots along the outer margin of wing ( +Fig. 4 +). Venation: petiole of cell m1 slightly shorter than discal cell, distinctly shorter than the length of cell m1 ( +Fig. 4 +). + + +Abdomen. Abdominal tergites brown with lateral margin black, the hind margin suffused with white, extending to the hind corner ( +Fig. 5 +). Sternite generally brown with second to fifth segments narrowly suffused with black on lateral margin ( +Fig. 5 +). Hypopygoum with tergite nine and sternite nine separated to each other, only fused at base ( +Figs 6 +, +9 +). Tergite nine with lateral margins straight, shallowly emarginated at hind margin, a pair of horn-shaped processes generated from the middle region, which divided by a narrow groove on dorsal surface, a pair of ear-shaped lobes extended from the ventral side ( +Figs 10–11 +). Gonocoxite stout, broad basally and shallowly concaved at apex, densely covered with long setae, with two horn-shaped processes black and pointed inward ( +Figs 9, 12 +). Sternite nine broad, equipped with a stout process at base, above which with paired finger-shaped processes which directed ventrally ( +Figs 9, 12 +). Outer gonostylus complicated, terminated into an obtuse lobe (o ol) and a sharp process (shp) on outer side, between them with a narrow light region, with another obtuse process (i ol) on inner side which connected to the sharp process ( +Figs 13–18 +). Inner gonostylus broad basally, squarely turned into a complicated and narrowed apex, a black finger-shaped process generated in the middle region, many long setae covered on dorsal corner ( +Figs 19–20 +). Adminiculum cylindrical, broad basally and narrowed to apex, deeply concaved apically ( +Figs 12 +, +23 +). + + +Semen pump. Semen pump with compressor apodeme fan-shaped ( +Fig. 21 +). Posterior immovable apodeme being triangular lobe, its dorsal angle sharply acute ( +Figs 22–23 +). Anterior immovable apodeme flattened and elongated, roundly expanded in dorsal view ( +Figs 22–23 +). Semen pump with a pair of wrinkled lobes which extended posteriorly forming a sheath ( +Figs 21–22 +). Aedeagus very short, tubular, narrowed basally, gradually broadened to the distal two third, and then narrowed to end again ( +Figs 22–23 +). Compressor apodeme and anterior immovable apodeme both directed ventrally ( +Fig. 23 +). + + +Genital bridge. W-shaped basally. Terminated into two narrowed lobes, the dorsal one longer than the ventral one ( +Fig. 24 +). + + +Ovipositor. Elongated. Tergite nine very short, dark brown ( +Figs 25–26 +). Sternite nine broad basally, narrowed to the median region, and then gradually broadened forming a fusiform part, finally terminated into an acute apex in dorsal view ( +Figs 7–8 +, +27–28 +). Tergite ten yellow. Sternite eight brown, longer than tergite ten ( +Figs 25–26 +). Cercus elongated, acinacifoliate, obtuse apically ( +Fig. 25 +). Hypogynial valve broad at base, narrowed to apex, distinctly shorter than cercus ( +Figs 7–8 +, +25–26 +). Vaginal apodeme broad basally, narrowed to apex ( +Fig. 29 +). + + +Male internal reproductive system. Consisting of a pair of accessory glands generating from the distal end of seminal vesicle which extended posteriorly into ejaculatory duct, a pair of vasa deferentia linking to paired testes anteriorly and converged into a common vas deferens which receiving to seminal vesicle posteriorly ( +Fig. 30 +). Ejaculatory duct relatively elongated, longer than the common vas deferens, flexible and spiral ( +Fig. 30 +). Seminal vesicle ball-shaped, leading to the proximal end of common vas deferens, running posterior to the apex of ejaculatory duct ( +Fig. 30 +). Accessory glands being a pair of elongated tubes, simple and sinuous, arising from base of seminal vesicle, very elongated ( +Fig. 30 +). Vas deferens short and stout, slightly shorter than common vas deferens, very smooth ( +Fig. 30 +). Testis, an elliptical structure ( +Fig. 30 +). + + +Female internal reproductive system. Consisting of a pair of accessory glands connected to bursa copulatrix by a short stem respectively, three spermathecae with responding spermatheca duct ( +Fig. 31 +). Bursa copulatrix relatively short and tough, generated from the ventral side of sternite nine, with a strongly sclerotized region near the copulatory opening ( +Fig. 31 +). Accessory gland arising from the base of bursa copulatrix, narrowed basally and terminated into an oval and swollen ball, densely covered with small dots ( +Fig. 31 +). Spermatheca three, spherical and black, bigger than the expanded end of accessary gland ( +Fig. 31 +). Spermathecal duct slender, half the thickness of bursa copulatrix, flexible, arising from the middle of bursa copulatrix and leading to the spermatheca by black internal tube which broadened and strongly sclerotized; the connection points of three spermathecal ducts with bursa copulatrix not at same level ( +Fig. 28 +). + + + +Figures 9–17. + +Brithura triprocessa +Men & Liu + + +sp. nov. + +9. Hypopygium, lateral view. 10. Tergite nine, dorsal view. 11. Tergite nine, caudal view. 12. Sternite nine, caudal view. 13–17. Outer gonostylus, rotate clockwise. + + + + +Figures 18–24. + +Brithura triprocessa +Men & Liu + + +sp. nov. + +18. Outer gonostylus, rotate clockwise. 19. Inner gonostylus, inner view. 20. Inner gonostylus, outer view. 21. Semen pump, dorsal view. 22. Semen pump, lateral view. 23. Perspective of hypopygium, gray regions show the position of semen pump, genital bridge and adminiculum. 24. Genital bridge, dorsal view. + + + + +Figures 25–29. + +Brithura triprocessa +Men & Liu + + +sp. nov. + +25. Ovipositor, lateral view. 26. Ovipositor, dorsal view. 27. Sternite nine, dorsal view. 28. Sternite nine and inner tube of female internal reproductive system, lateral view. 29. Vaginal apodeme, dorsal view. + + + + +Material +examined. +Holotype +male, +China +, +Anhui Province +, +Yuexi +, +Yaoluoping National Nature Reserve +, + +12 August 2013 + +, leg. +Qiulei Men. +Paratypes +. +4 females +, same data as holotype + +; + +9 males +, +8 females +, + +22 August 2016 + +, others same data as holotype + +; + +6 males +, +20 females +, + +12 August 2018 + +, leg. +Qiulei Men +, +Lei Yang +, +Weiguang Liu +, others same data as holotype + +. + +All +deposited in +ANU + +. + + +Distribution. +China +( +Anhui +). + + +Remarks. The new species is most similar to another Chinese species + +B. stigmosa +Liu & Yang, +2010 + +in body color, vein pattern and shape of outer gonostylus. It can be separated from the latter by the 9th tergite with two horn-shaped processes (absent in the latter), by the inner gonostylus terminating into a narrowed apex (not changing to a narrowed end in the latter). + + +Etymology. The specific epithet is a noun ‘ +processa +’ with Latin prefix ‘ +tri +’, referring to the outer gonostylus having three processes. + + + +Figures 30–31. + +Brithura triprocessa +Men & Liu + + +sp. nov. + +30. Male internal reproductive system. 31. Female internal reproductive system. + + + +Funding +This study is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of +China +(41501058, 31300551), the +Anhui +Outstanding Young Talent Support Program (gxfx2017059) and the Foundation of the Education Department of +Anhui Province +(KJ2017A360). + + + + +Acknowledgements +We thank to Dr. Pjotr Oosterbroek, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, +the Netherlands +, for his valuable web site, the +Catalogue of the Craneflies of the World +(http://ccw.naturalis.nl/index.php), which provides much valuable information about distribution and taxonomy. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4C/87/374C87FBFFE5FFF8FF72C177FB0EF9AA.xml b/data/37/4C/87/374C87FBFFE5FFF8FF72C177FB0EF9AA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f29271725ce --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4C/87/374C87FBFFE5FFF8FF72C177FB0EF9AA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,432 @@ + + + +Miconia amplipedunculata (Melastomataceae: Miconieae), a new species from the Caribbean lowlands of Panama + + + +Author + +Almeda, Frank +California Academy of Sciences, Institute for Biodiversity Science and Sustainability, Department of Botany, 55 Music Concourse Drive, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 94118 - 4503, USA + + + +Author + +Ortíz, Orlando O. +Herbario PMA & Departamento de Botánica, Universidad de Panamá, Panama City, Republic of Panama; Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Strasse 6 - 8, D- 14195 Berlin, Germany + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2022 + +2022-12-13 + + +575 + + +3 + + +294 +300 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.575.3.7 + +journal article +208107 +10.11646/phytotaxa.575.3.7 +630ed91e-e934-409c-968e-4c14d4fd25a3 +1179-3163 +7431338 + + + + + + +Miconia amplipedunculata +Almeda & O. Ortíz + +, + +sp. nov. + +( +Figs. 1 +& +2 +) + + + + + +Diagnosis:— + +Miconia amplipedunculata + +can be recognized by its shortly petiolate lanceolate to oblanceolate leaf blades that are alternately 3-plinerved, brown amorphous stellulate-lepidote indumentum on the primary and secondary veins of abaxial foliar surfaces and inflorescence, long-pedunculate (to +12.5 cm +) inflorescence, persistent bracts and bracteoles, unlobed calyx that is truncate and flangelike, prominent subulate calyx teeth that exceed the calyx in length, 5-merous flowers, distally constricted anther filaments, and isometric stamens that lack appendages. + + + + +Type:— + +PANAMA +. +Colón +: +Distrito Donoso +, +Valle Grande +, antiguas oficinas +MPSA +, +Quebrada +arriaba nacia +Patio Limosa +, 08º4934.1’ +N +, 80º40’15.9’ +W +, + +279 m + +, + +4 November 2015 + +, fl., + +I +. +Vergara-Pérez +1050 & +Rojas + +( +holotype +PMA +[127052]!; isotype +MO +[6718180]!) + +. + + + + +Shrub to +2 m +tall, cauline nodes of uppermost branchlets somewhat swollen, the internodes rounded, glabrous and vaguely ridged when dry. Leaves of a pair equal to slightly unequal in size, concolored when dry, petioles +0.4–1 cm +long, canaliculated adaxially; blades 16–25 × +4–6 cm +, subcoriaceous when dry, lanceolate to oblanceolate, apex acuminate, base rounded to obtuse, margin entire, 3-plinerved with an elevated midvein and one pair of secondaries mostly alternately diverging from the midvein +2.5–8 cm +above the blade base, the tertiary veins conspicuous, elevated and spaced +5–8 mm +apart at the wider portions of the abaxial surface of the blade, adaxially glabrous at maturity, abaxially essentially glabrous or glabrate on the actual surface but moderately to copiously beset with a brown stellulate-lepidote indumentum on primary and secondary veins. Inflorescence terminal, thyrsoid, +15 cm +long with distal branching, the elongate typically widely spreading peduncle +12.5 cm +long, copiously stelluate-lepidote; bracts of the rachis nodes 1.5–3 × +0.5 mm +, sessile, persistent, lanceolate to elliptic, glabrous adaxially, abaxially moderately and inconspicuously brown amorphous lepidote; bracteoles 0.75–1 × +0.5 mm +, sessile, persistent, ovate-lanceolate, adaxially glabrous and abaxially with an indumentum like the bracts. Flowers 5-merous, perfect, pedicels +1–1.5 mm +long, hypanthia campanulate, 1.5 × +1.5 mm +(excluding tube and flangelike calyx), copiously to moderately brown stelluate-lepidote, the calyx unlobed, reduced to a truncate flangelike rim ca. +0.25 mm +long; exterior calyx teeth 5, erect, bluntly subulate, +0.5 mm +long and exceeding the truncate calyx; torus minutely glandular-puberulent adaxially. Petals 3.5–4 × +0.75–1 mm +, pink to pink-magenta, glabrous, elliptic-oblong, apically obtuse with a minute apical mucro. Stamens 10, isometric and isomorphic, forming a ring around the style at anthesis, filaments +1.5 mm +long, white, glabrous, complanate, constricted distally just below the anther thecae; anthers +1 mm +long and ca. +0.25 mm +wide, pale yellow, linear oblong, the apex with a ± truncate or somewhat dorsally inclined terminal pore; connective slightly thickened but unappendaged. Ovary (at anthesis) ca. 3/5 inferior, 5-locular, ± globose, apex conspicuously fluted, densely white-papillate. Style straight or somewhat declinate, glabrous, +3.5–4 mm +long, white; stigma capitellate. Mature berries and seeds not seen. + + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Miconia amplipedunculata +. + +A. Habit. B. Inflorescence rachis (enlarged to show indumentum). C. Cauline internode. D. Representative leaf (abaxial surface). E. Flower in profile view. F. Petal (adaxial surface) G. Stamen (profile view showing distal filament constriction). H. Stamen (dorsal view). I. Hypanthium, truncate calyx, and exterior teeth (profile view). J. Style and stigma. K. Ovary in cross section. L. Bracteoles. M. Inflorescence bracts. Drawn from MO isotype. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Miconia amplipedunculata +. + +A. Field photograph showing habit and spreading long-pedunculate inflorescence. B. Field photograph showing close-up of inflorescence with open flowers and buds). Photographs of type collection by Irving Vergara-Pérez. + + + + +FIGURE 3. +Distribution of +Miconia amplipedunculata +. + + + + +Distribution, habitat, and phenology:— + +Miconia amplipedunculata + +is presently known only from low elevations (below +300 m +) in the Donoso district of coastal +Colón province +on the Caribbean slope of +Panama +( +Fig. 3 +). At its only known locality, where it is evidently uncommon, + +M. amplipedunculata + +grows in or at the margins of mature secondary rainforest. The +type +and only known collection was flowering in early November. + + + + +Conservation +:— + +The Caribbean slope rainforest habitat where + +Miconia amplipedunculata + +grows is not part of a protected area. Because the +type +was the only collection available for this study we were unable to calculate area of occupancy and extent of occurrence for a recommended conservation assessment using +IUCN + + +guidelines and criteria ( +IUCN 2019 +). The +type +locality appears to be within the +Concesión del Proyecto Mina de Cobre +, a large-scale open-pit copper mine development in +Panama +. +The +concession consists of four zones amounting to 13,600 hectares (https://www.first-quantum.com). +We +have no information on the exact occurrence of + +M. amplipedunculata + +within this concession. +Until +the distribution of this species is better known we regard its conservation status as +Data Deficient +( +DD +) + +. + + + + +Etymology:— +The epithet for this species, + +amplipedunculata +, + +is derived from the Latin word “amplus” (ample, large, abundant, or great). It highlights the unusually long inflorescence peduncle of this species which readily distinguishes it from all allied species. + + + + +Affinities:— + +Miconia amplipedunculata + +is morphologically most similar to a group of species that includes + +M. iteophylla +Almeda (1989: 214) + +, + +M. jefensis +Almeda (2000: 43) + +, + +M. ligulata +Almeda 1989: 216 + +), and + +M. peltata +Almeda (1989: 217) + +. Like + +M. amplipedunculata + +, most of these species are restricted to +Panama +; only + +M. ligulata + +has a range that extends from +Nicaragua +to +Colombia +and +Venezuela +( +Almeda 1989 +, +2009 +; + +Almeda +et al +. 2016 + +). All of these species share a brown amorphous stellulate-lepidote indumentum, oblong petals, unappendaged anther connectives, filaments that are constricted distally, a torus that is puberulent adaxially, persistent bracts and bracteoles, and 5-locular ovaries. + +Miconia peltata + +can be distinguished from all other species in this complex by its peltate, 5–7-plinerved leaves that are broadly rounded to subcordate at the base, an inflorescence that is divaricately branched at the initiating node, five welldefined triangular calyx lobes, and higher elevation ( +850–1000 m +). Our new species is probably closest to + +M. jefensis + +which has wider ( +7–14 cm +) leaf blades that are 5–7-nerved (vs. blades +4–6 cm +and 3-plinerved) and well-defined rounded-triangular calyx lobes (vs. an unlobed truncate calyx), and grows at higher elevations ( +700–1000 m +vs. +279 m +). + +Miconia iteophylla + +also has 3-plinerved leaves with the inner pair of secondary veins diverging from the median nerve in opposite or subalternate fashion like + +M. amplipedunculata + +but its leaves are narrowly elliptic and smaller (4.5–9 × +0.6–1.7 cm +), its inflorescence is a terminal panicle that branches +0.6–3 cm +above the node initiating the inflorescence, its calyx consists of five depressed triangular undulations, its petals are white, and it grows at somewhat higher elevations ( +200–600 m +). + +Miconia amplipedunculata + +is only superficially similar to + +M. ligulata + +, the most widespread species among this group of congeners; the latter grows in habitats spanning the elevational range of all closely related species in this group ( +0–1100 m +). + +Miconia ligulata + +has leaf blades of comparable size to + +M. amplipedunculata + +but they are 5-plinerved, attenuate to long-acuminate apically with a base that is gradually tapering and decurrent on the petiole, its inflorescence branches at the initiating node, its calyx consists of five depressed triangular lobes, and its petals are white. All of the close relatives of + +M. amplipedunculata + +were included by +Kriebel (2016) +in his enlarged concept of the genus + +Conostegia +D. +Don (1823: 284 + +, 316). A cladogram of a molecular phylogenetic hypothesis in Kriebel’s monograph ( +Fig. 1 +) shows three of the four sampled species ( + +M. jefensis + +, + +M. ligulata + +, and + +M. peltata + +) grouping with + +Clidemia trichosantha +Almeda (1984: 274) + +and + +Miconia brenesii +Standley (1938: 816) + +in his sect. + +Geniculatae + +. We here interpret all of these species to be part of a greatly expanded + +Miconia +( + +Michelangeli +et al +. 2022 + +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4C/8E/374C8E2DAD92AA5E6F161D6BCBDB35A5.xml b/data/37/4C/8E/374C8E2DAD92AA5E6F161D6BCBDB35A5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a9bd1f7c255 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4C/8E/374C8E2DAD92AA5E6F161D6BCBDB35A5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ + + + +Note sur les fourmis du Musée Zoologique de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences à St. Pétersbourg. + + + +Author + +Forel, A. + +text + + +Yezhegodnik Zoologicheskogo Muzeya Imperatorskoi Akademii Nauk + + +1904 + +8 + + +368 +388 + + + +journal article +3994 +10.5281/zenodo.25586 + + + + +Formica fusca L. v. fusco-rufibarbis Forel +, + + + +Transcaucasie occid., Gouv. Kutais, Artvin, 1 [[ worker ]], 23. VI. 1898 (Derjugin!). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4D/20/374D209F13CEFFD1D0FB7D5F3C379A21.xml b/data/37/4D/20/374D209F13CEFFD1D0FB7D5F3C379A21.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c0dd86478f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4D/20/374D209F13CEFFD1D0FB7D5F3C379A21.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part T) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +878 +905 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Thea bohea +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +, ed. 2, 1 + +: 734. 1762 + + +, +nom. illeg. + + + +"Habitat in Japonia, China." RCN: 3882. + + + +Replaced synonym: + +Thea sinensis +L. (1753) + +. + + + + + +Lectotype + +(Bartholomew in Jarvis & al., +Regnum Veg. +127: 93. 1993): [icon] + +"Tsja" + +in Kaempfer, Amoen. Exot. Fasc.: 605, 606. 1712. + + + + +Current name: + + +Camellia sinensis + +(L.) Kuntze + +( +Theaceae +). + + + + +Note: +A superfluous name for + +T. sinensis +L. (1753) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4D/64/374D64531F185A9380346BF8496FD4AF.xml b/data/37/4D/64/374D64531F185A9380346BF8496FD4AF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..176e7e88ea8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4D/64/374D64531F185A9380346BF8496FD4AF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,277 @@ + + + +The tremendous diversity of Labiobaetis Novikova & Kluge in Indonesia (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae) + + + +Author + +Kaltenbach, Thomas + + + +Author + +Gattolliat, Jean-Luc + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +895 + + +1 +117 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.895.38576 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.895.38576 +1313-2970-895-1 +11350FE921E64D7AB1F916CE4639F406 +99AB66C9ACF058A581D9036697D415F3 + + + + +1. +Labiobaetis batakorum +sp. nov. +Figures 2 +, +3 +, +47a +, +52a +, +54a + + + +Diagnosis. + +Larva. +Following combination of characters: A) dorsal surface of labrum with submarginal arc of 1 + 4 long, simple setae; B) labial palp segment II with a broad, thumb-like distomedial protuberance, segment III conical; C) fore femur rather broad, length ca. 3 +x +maximum width, dorsal margin with a row of ca. nine curved, spine-like setae; D) fore claw with 9-12 denticles; E) paraproct distally not expanded, with 11-18 stout marginal spines. + + + +Description. + +Larva +( +Figs 2 +, +3 +, +47a +, +52a +). Body length 4.5-4.7 mm; antenna approximately 2.5 +x +as long as head length. + + +Colouration +. Head, thorax, and abdomen dorsally brown, head and thorax with bright, median, dorsal suture, thorax and abdomen with pattern as in +Fig. 47a +, forewing pads with brown striation. Head, thorax, and abdomen ventrally light brown, legs transparent, femur with a distomedial brown spot and apex brown, tibia and tarsus distally brown ( +Fig. 52a +). Caudal filaments light brown with a dark brown band at ca. 1/2 of cerci. + + +Antenna +with scape and pedicel subcylindrical, with well-developed distolateral process at scape ( +Fig. 3f +); flagellum with broad, lanceolate spines and fine, simple setae on apex of each segment. + + +Labrum +( +Fig. 2a +). Rectangular, length 0.7 +x +maximum width. Distal margin with medial emargination and a small process. Dorsally with long, fine, simple setae scattered over surface; submarginal arc of setae composed of 1 + 4 long, simple setae, the first two setae after the central seta are closely together. Ventrally with marginal row of setae composed of lateral and anterolateral long, feathered setae and medial long, bifid, pectinate setae; ventral surface with five short, spine-like setae near lateral and anterolateral margin. + + +Right mandible +( +Fig. 2b, c +). Incisors fused. Outer and inner sets of denticles with 4 + 3 denticles and one minute intermediate denticle. Inner margin of innermost denticle with a row of thin setae. Prostheca robust, apically denticulate. Margin between prostheca and mola slightly convex. Tuft of setae at apex of mola present. + + +Left mandible +( +Fig. 2d, e +). Incisors fused. Outer and inner sets of denticles with 4 + 3 denticles and one minute intermediate denticle. Prostheca robust, apically with small denticles and comb-shaped structure. Margin between prostheca and mola slightly convex, with minute denticles toward subtriangular process. Subtriangular process long and slender, above level of area between prostheca and mola. Denticles of mola apically constricted. Tuft of setae at apex of mola absent. + + + +Figure 2. + +Labiobaetis batakorum + +sp. nov., larva morphology: +a +Labrum +b +Right mandible +c +Right prostheca +d +Left mandible +e +Left prostheca +f +Hypopharynx +g +Maxilla +h +Labium. + + +Both mandibles with lateral margins almost straight. Basal half with fine, simple setae scattered over dorsal surface. + + +Hypopharynx + +( +Fig. 2f +). Lingua longer than superlingua. Lingua approx. as broad as long; medial tuft of stout setae well developed, short; distal half not expanded. Superlingua rounded; lateral margin rounded; fine, long, simple setae along distal margin. + + +Maxilla +( +Fig. 2g +). Galea-lacinia with one simple, robust apical seta under crown. Inner dorsal row of setae with three denti-setae, distal denti-seta tooth-like, middle and proximal denti-setae slender, bifid and pectinate. Medially with one bipectinate, spine-like seta and 4-5 long, simple setae. Maxillary palp 1.3 +x +as long as length of galea-lacinia; two segmented; palp segment II 1.2 +x +length of segment I; setae on maxillary palp fine, simple, scattered over surface of segments I and II; apex of last segment rounded, with slight excavation at inner distolateral margin. + + +Labium +( +Fig. 2h +). Glossa basally broad, narrowing toward apex; shorter than paraglossa; inner margin with 8-9 spine-like setae, distalmost seta much longer than other setae; apex with two long, robust, pectinate setae and one medium, robust seta; outer margin with 5-6 spine-like setae increasing in length distally; ventral surface with short, fine, simple and short, spine-like setae. Paraglossa sub-rectangular, curved inward; apex rounded; with three rows of long, robust, distally pectinate setae in apical area and two medium, simple setae in anteromedial area; dorsally with a row of four long, spine-like setae near inner margin. Labial palp with segment I 0.9 +x +length of segments II and III combined. Segment I ventrally with short, fine, simple setae. Segment II with broad thumb-like distomedial protuberance; distomedial protuberance 0.5 +x +width of base of segment III; inner and outer margin with short, fine, simple setae; dorsally with a row of 4-5 long, spine-like, simple setae near outer margin. Segment III conical; apex rounded; length 1.0 +x +width; ventrally covered with short and medium spine-like, simple setae and short, fine, simple setae. + + +Hind wing pads +absent ( +Fig. 3g +). + + +Foreleg +( +Fig. 3a, b +). Ratio of foreleg segments 1.4:1.0:0.6:0.2. +Femur +. Length ca. 3 +x +maximum width. Dorsal margin with a row of ca. nine curved, spine-like setae; length of setae 0.13 +x +maximum width of femur. Apex rounded; with one pair of spine-like setae and some short, stout setae. Many stout, lanceolate setae scattered along ventral margin; femoral patch absent. +Tibia. +Dorsal margin with a row of short, spine-like setae and fine, simple setae, near margin some stout, apically rounded setae; on apex one longer, spine-like, apically rounded seta. Ventral margin with a row of curved, spine-like setae, on apex some spine-like, partly bipectinate setae and a tuft of long, fine, simple setae. Anterior surface scattered with stout, lanceolate setae. Patellotibial suture present on basal 1/2. +Tarsus. +Dorsal margin with a row of short, stout setae. Ventral margin with a row of curved, spine-like setae. Tarsal claw with one row of 9-12 denticles; distally pointed; with 5-7 stripes; subapical setae absent. + + +Tergum +( +Fig. 3c +). Surface with irregular rows of U-shaped scale bases and scattered micropores. Posterior margin of tergum IV with triangular spines, wider than long. + + +Gills +( +Fig. 3d +). Present on segments +I-VII +. Margin with small denticles intercalating fine simple setae. Tracheae extending from main trunk to inner and outer margins. Gill I ca. 2/3 length of segment II. Gill IV as long as length of segments V and 2/3 VI combined. Gill VII as long as length of segments VIII and 1/3 IX combined. + + +Paraproct +( +Fig. 3e +). Distally not expanded, with 11-18 stout marginal spines. Surface scattered with U-shaped scale bases, fine, simple setae and micropores. Cercotractor with numerous small marginal spines. + + + +Figure 3. + +Labiobaetis batakorum + +sp. nov., larva morphology: +a +Foreleg +b +Fore claw +c +Tergum IV +d +Gill IV +e +Paraproct +f +Scape +g +Metanotum. + + + + +Etymology. +Dedicated to the indigenous Batak people from Sumatra. + + +Distribution. +Indonesia: Sumatra. + + +Biological aspects. +The specimens were collected at altitudes from sea level to 280 m. + + +Type-material. + +Holotype. +Larva (on slide, GBIFCH 00592194), Indonesia, Sumatra Barat, Sawahlunto, stream, 275 m, 10.XI.2011, +00°41.33'S +, +100°46.72'E +, M. Balke leg. (UN5). Temporary deposited in MZL before definitely housed in MZB. +Paratypes. +11 larvae (2 on slides, GBIFCH 00592195, GBIFCH 00592196, 7 in alcohol, GBIFCH 00515349, deposited in MZL; 2 in alcohol, GBIFCH 00515347, deposited in ZSM), same data as holotype. + + + +Other material. + +2 larvae (on slides, GBIFCH 00592200, GBIFCH 00592199, deposited in MZL), Indonesia, Sumatra Barat, Barung-Barung, +01°06.03'S +, +100°29.12'E +, 75 m, 24.V.2010, J.-M. Elouard leg.; 4 larvae (2 on slides, GBIFCH 00592197, GBIFCH 00592198, 2 in alcohol, GBIFCH 00515365, deposited in MZL), Indonesia, Sumatra Barat, Tarusan, upstream Tarusan, 01°13.62'S, 100°29.83'E, 10 m, 24.V.2010, J.-M. Elouard leg. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4D/87/374D87DFFFBBFF93FF57F2152FE7FE23.xml b/data/37/4D/87/374D87DFFFBBFF93FF57F2152FE7FE23.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4ec587ef034 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4D/87/374D87DFFFBBFF93FF57F2152FE7FE23.xml @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ + + + +Revision of Sinomesuropetala daohugensis Boudet, Nel & Huang, 2023 (Odonata Aeshnoptera: Mesuropetalidae) + + + +Author + +Qi, Pengliang +0009-0006-0002-8451; +School of GeoSciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan, 430100, China & State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology and Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing, 210008, China & University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China + + + +Author + +Nel, André +0000-0002-4238-9435; +Institut Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, CNRS, EPHE, Sorbonne Université, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, F- 75005, Paris, France. + + + +Author + +Xiao, Chuantao +0000-0002-4241-7651 +School of GeoSciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan, 430100, China +ctxiao@yangtzeu.edu.cn + + + +Author + +Zheng, Daran +0000-0003-0520-6780; +State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology and Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing, 210008, China +drzheng@nigpas.ac.cn + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2023 + +2023-11-21 + + +5375 + + +1 + + +103 +110 + + + + +https://www.mapress.com/zt/article/download/zootaxa.5375.1.6/52316 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5375.1.6 +1175-5326 +10171012 +D827604A-356D-43D7-83CD-752B0017C5AC + + + + + +Sinomesuropetala daohugensis + +Boudet, Nel & Huang, 2023 + + + + + + +( +Figures 1–4 +) + + + + +New material. + +NIGP203295 +, part and counterpart of a well-preserved +male +dragonfly, with nearly complete body, left forewing and hindwing, and very basally-preserved right forewing and hindwing + +. + + + + +Emended diagnosis. +Forewing discoidal and subdiscoidal triangles three-celled and strongly transverse; hindwing discoidal and subdiscoidal triangles free; unicellular anal triangle; three rows of cells in postdiscoidal area before midfork; IR1 originated below pterostigma, zigzagged and poorly defined; IR2 originating from RP3/4; pterostigma very long and covering more than eight cells; cerci elongated. + + + + +Description. +Body length from head to tip of abdomen +76.4 mm +; head +5.2 mm +long and +5.7 mm +wide; thorax +12.8 mm +long and maximum +5.6 mm +wide; abdomen elongated, +54.7 mm +long and maximum +4.4 mm +wide. + + +Forewing 54.0 mm long and maximum width +9.4 mm +; distance from base to arculus +4.1 mm +, from base to nodus +29.6 mm +, and from nodus to pterostigma +12.1 mm +; pterostigma 6.0 mm long and +0.8 mm +wide, covering at least eight cells; primary antenodal crossveins stronger than secondary antenodal crossveins; Ax0 near wing base, Ax1 +3.5 mm +distal of Ax0 and +0.6 mm +basal of arculus, Ax2 +8.4 mm +distal of Ax1, opposite distal angle of discoidal triangle; five secondary antenodal crossveins present between Ax1 and Ax2; at least 10 antenodal crossveins visible between costal margin and ScP distal of Ax2, not aligned with nine antenodal crossveins between ScP and RA; eight postnodal crossveins present, not aligned with nine postsubnodal crossveins in second row; RP1 and RP2 closely parallel up to pterostigma with one row of cells in-between and two rows below level of mid-pterostigma; RP2 and IR2 closely parallel, with mostly one row of cells in-between, but two rows near wing margin; primary oblique vein ‘O’ absent and secondary oblique vein well present; no well-defined Rspl and Mspl; RP3/4 and MA basally parallel, sigmoidal, with a single row of cells in-between below second ‘O’, area between them expanded distally; postdiscoidal area with three rows of cells before midfork, expanded distally; +MP +and CuAa parallel, with a single row of cells in-between; median space free; CuP-crossing +1.1 mm +basad arculus and +3.9 mm +distad wing base; discoidal triangle elongated and wide, divided into three smaller cells, with length of anterior side +3.6 mm +and of basal side +3.4 mm +; subdiscoidal triangle divided into three cells; hypertriangle free; CuAa with four well-defined posterior branches; anal area with two rows of cells. + + +Hindwing, +51.6 mm +long and maximum width +9.6 mm +; distance from base to arculus +3.5 mm +; Ax0 near wing base; Ax1 +2.4 mm +distal of Ax0 and +0.8 mm +basal of arculus; Ax2 +4.8 mm +distal of Ax1; pterostigma elongated and well braced, +7.5 mm +long and +0.7 mm +wide, covering at least nine cells; anal triangle one-celled. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4D/87/374D87FDB000FFEDFF99FA1AD7E4355F.xml b/data/37/4D/87/374D87FDB000FFEDFF99FA1AD7E4355F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..efe053d0725 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4D/87/374D87FDB000FFEDFF99FA1AD7E4355F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1506 @@ + + + +The genus Setaphyes (Kinorhyncha, Pycnophyidae) in European waters: Redescription of Setaphyes dentatus (Reinhard, 1881) and Setaphyes kielensis (Zelinka, 1928), including notes on morphometrics, sexually dimorphic features and reproduction of the genus + + + +Author + +González-Casarrubios, Alberto + + + +Author + +Cepeda, Diego + + + +Author + +Neuhaus, Birger + + + +Author + +García-Cobo, Marta + + + +Author + +Pardos, Fernando + + + +Author + +Ürkmez, Derya + + + +Author + +Sánchez, Nuria + +text + + +Zoologischer Anzeiger + + +2023 + +2023-03-31 + + +303 + + +90 +111 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2022.12.004 + +journal article +10.1016/j.jcz.2022.12.004 +1873-2674 +8164206 + + + + + + +3.2. Redescription of +Setaphyes kielensis (Zelinka, 1928) + + + + + + +Figs 9–14 +, +Tables 3–4. + + + + +3.2.1. Diagnosis + + + +Setaphyes + +with middorsal elevations on segments 1–9, superficially covered by tufts of elongated, thick hairs. Paradorsal setae on segments 2–9 (that of segment 8 unpaired). Laterodorsal setae on segments 2–9. Lateroventral setae on segments 2–10. Ventromedial setae on segments 3–9. Lateral terminal spines short, slender (males LTS:TL average ratio 31.4 %; females LTS:TL average ratio 9 %; males and females average ratio 19.1 %). + + + + +3.2.2. Material examined + + + +59 specimens +collected from two different populations located in the +Anatolian Peninsula +and +North Frisia. Material +from +Anatolia +are new records for the region, which includes + +four females +mounted for LM, and + +one female +studied with SEM ( +ZMB 12745 +, station YSL09 +R2 +, + +13 July 2019 + +, 41 + +Ǫ +24.738 + +′ +N, 036 + +Ǫ +39.210 + +′ +E, + +76 m +depth + +; collector: +Derya Ürkmez +). +Material +from +Germany +( +Sylt +) included + + +17 males +and +15 females +mounted for LM ( +ZMB 12364–12365 +were studied only for the intraspecific variability, same sampling locality as for the remaining LM specimens included in the +Supplementary Table +I); and + + +22 adults +for SEM ( + +22 June 2016 + +, 54 +Ǫ +57 +′ +15 +′′ +N, 008 +Ǫ +21 +′ +34 +′′ +E, precision + +50 m + +, collectors: +Birger Neuhaus +and +Hiroshi Yamasaki +) ( +10 males +: +ZMB 12455 +, +12457 +, +12458 +, +12461–12463 +, +12468 +, +12 +470, 12472, 12477; +12 females +: +ZMB 12454 +, +12456 +, +12460 +, +12464 +, +12465 +, +12467 +, +12469 +, +12471 +, +12474–12476 +, +12478 +). +Detailed +information of the sampling localities of each LM specimen is provided in the + +Supplementary +Table I + + +. + + + + +3.2.3. Description + + +See +Table 3 +and Supplementary Table III for measurements and dimensions and +Table 4 +for summary of middorsal cuticular specialization, seta, tube, nephridiopore and sensory spot locations. + + +Nine, equally sized outer oral styles in Ring 00 of mouth cone. Each outer oral style formed by a single, flexible unit, wider at base, and showing a sheath with up to 13 fringed rows broader at the proximal region and becoming narrower towards the pointed tip ( +Figs 3 +; +11A +). Trapezoidal, superficially smooth, cuticular thickenings in between the outer oral styles, with two basal, short, fringed rows ( +Fig. 11A +). Outer oral styles arranged one by each introvert sector, except in sector 6 where a style is missing ( +Fig. 3 +). Inner rings of mouth cone not observed and, hence, detailed information on the morphology and distribution of inner styles is not provided. + + +Introvert with six rings of spinoscalids and 10 longitudinal sectors defined by the disposition of the primary spinoscalids. Scalid and trichoscalid arrangement and morphology as described for + +S. dentatus + +( +Figs 3 +; +10A +; +11A–D +). + + + +Fig. 9. +Line art illustration of + +Setaphyes kielensis + +. A: Male, ventral view; B: Male, dorsal view; C: Female, segments 1–3, ventral view; D: female, segments 9–11, ventral view. Scale bar: 100 μm. Abbreviations: ap, apodeme; cr, cuticular ridge; cs, cuticular scar; dpl, dorsal placid; ica, intracuticlular atria; ldse, laterodorsal setae; ldss, laterodorsal sensory spot; lts, lateral terminal spine; lvse, lateroventral setae; mde, middorsal elevation; ms, muscular scar; ne, nephridiopore; pdse, paradorsal setae; pdss, paradorsal sensory spot; ps, penile spine; sdss, subdorsal sensory spot; spf, secondary pectinate fringe; vlse, ventrolateral setae; vmse, ventromedial setae; vmss, ventromedial sensory spot; vmtu, ventromedial tube; vpl, ventral placid. + + + + +Fig. 10. +Light micrographs of females (ZMB 12307: A; ZMB 12742: B–C, E–J; ZMB 12744: D), and male (ZMB 12294: K) of + +Setaphyes kielensis + +. A: Sector 6 (middorsal) of the introvert; B: Dorsal view of segments 1–3; C: Ventral view of segments 1–3; D: Ventral view on left side of the sternal plate of segments 5–6; E: Dorsal view of segments 4–7; F: Ventral view of segments 4–7; G: Dorsal view on the central part of the tergal plate of segments 3–4; H: Dorsal view of segments 8–11; I: Ventral view of segments 8–11; J: Female LTS; K: Male LTS. Abbreviations: ldse, laterodorsal setae; lts, lateral terminal spine; lvse, lateroventral setae; mde, middorsal elevation; ne, nephridiopore; pdse, paradorsal setae; ppf, primary pectinate fringe; ps, penile spines; psp, primary spinoscalid; sp, spinoscalid (followed by the number of corresponding ring); ts, trichoscalids; vlse, ventrolateral setae; vmse, ventromedial setae. Lambda symbols (Λ) mark attachment points of scalids (A). Numbers after abbreviations indicate the number of the corresponding segment. Dashed circles mark sensory spots. + + + + +Fig. 11. +SEM photographs of the head of + +Setaphyes kielensis + +(male ZMB 12455: A–D). A: Detail of mouth cone ring 00 showing the outer oral style morphology; B: introvert sector 4 (laterodorsal); C: introvert sector 2 (ventrolateral); D: detail of neck (dorsal view) showing the trichoscalids and the placids. Abbreviations: ba, bacteria; bef, basal elongated fringe; bs, basal sheath; bsf, basal short fringe; ct, cuticular thickening; dpl, dorsal placid; ep, end-piece of spinoscalid; psp, primary spinoscalid; sp, spinoscalid (followed by number of corresponding ring); ts, trichoscalid. Lambda symbols (Λ) mark attachment points of scalids. + + + +Neck with four dorsal and two ventral, sclerotized placids ( +Figs 9A–C +; +10B–C +; +11D +). Dorsal placids rectangular, with a slightly convex anterior margin; mesial ones broader (ca. 32 μm wide at base) than lateral ones (ca. 23 μm wide at base) ( +Figs 9B +; +10B +; +11D +). Ventral placids (ca. 21 μm wide at base) morphologically similar to the dorsal ones but much more elongated, getting thinner towards the lateral sides ( +Figs 9A, C +; +10C +). + + +Trunk with eleven segments ( +Figs 9A–B +; +12A, F +; +13A, D +). Segment 1 with one tergal, two episternal and one trapezoidal, midsternal plate; remaining ones with one tergal and two sternal cuticular plates ( +Figs 9A–D +; +10B–C, E–F, H–I +; +12A–C, E–H +; +13A–F +; +14A–C, F +). Sternal plates reaching their maximum width at segment 5, almost constant in width throughout the trunk ( +Figs 9A–B +; +12A, F +; +13A, D +; +14A, F +). Sternal cuticular plates relatively narrow (MSW-5:TL average ratio = 30 %) ( +Figs 9A–B +; +12A, F +). Middorsal elevations on segments 1–9, quite inconspicuous, rectangular, narrow, distally blunted, not projecting beyond the posterior margin of segments ( +Figs 9B +; +10B, E, G–H +). Paired, paradorsal, butterfly to trident-like intracuticular atria associated to the middorsal structures ( +Fig. 10G +). Cuticular scars (possibly glandular cell outlets) as minute, dot-shaped, rounded to oval perforations throughout the cuticle on segments 1–11 ( +Figs 9A–D +; +10B–I +); the number and position of these structures vary greatly among the analysed specimens, with no specific pattern. Up to three pairs of conspicuous laterodorsal and ventromedial cuticular ridges on segments 2–10 ( +Fig. 9A–D +). Cuticular hairs acicular, non-bracteate, distributed throughout the trunk on segments 1–10 not following any particular pattern and giving the animal a furry appearance ( +Figs 12A–I +; +13A–F +; +14A–D +). Pachycycli and ball-and-socket joints conspicuous on segments 2–9, reduced on most posterior segments, and also depending on maturation of specimens ( +Fig. 9A–D +). Apodemes on segments 9–10 ( +Figs 9A, D +; +10H–I +). Primary pectinate fringes finely serrated ( +Figs 10D +; +12H +; +13F +); secondary pectinate fringes as a wavy, single line along the entire dorsal side with two subdorsal indentations pointing backwards. Ventral secondary pectinate fringes as a wavy, single line in ventromedial or paraventral positions ( +Fig. 9A–D +). Muscular scars as conspicuous, rounded to oval, hairless areas in laterodorsal and ventrolateral positions on segments 1–10 ( +Figs 9A–D +; +13B, E +; +14B–D +). + + + +Fig. 12. +SEM photographs of females (ZMB 12456: A, E, G; ZMB 12467: B; ZMB 12471 D), males (ZMB 12477: C, H–I; ZMB 12463: F) of + +Setaphyes kielensis + +from Sylt. A: ventral overview; B: ventral view of segments 1–4; C: ventral view of segments 1–2; D: right sternal plates of segments 2–3; E: ventral view of segments 6–8; F: ventral overview; G: ventral view of segments 9–10; H: ventral view of segments 10–11; I: detail of the penile spines and bristles. Abbreviations: br, bristle; gco, glandular cell outlets; lts, lateral terminal spine; lvse, lateroventral setae; ppf, primary pectinate fringe; ps, penile spines; sp, spermatophore; vlse, ventrolateral setae; vmse, ventromedial setae; vmtu, ventromedial tube. Numbers after abbreviations indicate the corresponding segment. Dashed circles mark sensory spots. + + + + +Fig. 13. +SEM photographs of females (ZMB 12476: A; ZMB 12474: B–C, E; ZMB 12456: D), male (ZMB 12470: F) of + +Setaphyes kielensis + +from Sylt. A: dorsolateral overview, right side of the trunk; B: lateral view of the left side of segments 1–4; C: lateral view of the left side of segments 8–9; D: dorsolateral overview, left side of the trunk; E: lateral view of the left side of segments 5–7; F: lateral view of the left side of segments 9–11. Abbreviations: ldse, laterodorsal setae; lts, lateral terminal spine; lvse, lateroventral setae; pdse, paradorsal setae; ppf, primary pectinate fringe. Numbers after abbreviations indicate the number of the corresponding segment. Dashed circles mark sensory spots. + + + +Segment 1 with middorsal elevation not projecting beyond the posterior margin of the segment, with paradorsal, butterfly to trident-like atria of associated paradorsal sensory spots ( +Figs 9B +; +10B +). Anterolateral margins of the tergal plate as triangular, short, wide, distally rounded extensions ( +Figs 9A–C +; +10B–C +; +13B +). Episternal plates with usually four, scattered, minute, dot-shaped glandular cell outlets ( +Fig. 9A, C +). Trapezoidal midsternal plate, wider at the base (ca. 29 μm wide at the most anterior margin, ca. 56 μm wide at the most posterior margin; average ratio =52 %), with parallel lateral margins ( +Figs 9A, C +; +10C +). Two pairs of sensory spots in subdorsal position, and one pair in laterodorsal and paradorsal positions, the latter towards the middle region of the segment ( +Figs 9B +; +10B +; +13A–B +). Sensory spots on this and following segments as oval areas with several rows of cuticular micropapillae surrounding a single pore ( +Fig. 12D +). + + + +Fig. 14. +SEM photographs of females (ZMB 12475: B; ZMB 12454: D), and males (ZMB 12458: A; ZMB 12470: C) of + +Setaphyes kielensis + +from Sylt. A: ventral view of the right sternal plates of segments 2–3 with an extra ventromedial tube on only one sternal plate of segment 3; B: lateral view of the right side of segments 2–4; C: ventral view of the right sternal plate of segment 5; D: dorsolateral view of the left side of the tergal plate of segment 2. Abbreviations: dse, double setae; mse, multiple setae; vmtu, ventromedial tube. + + + + +Table 3 + + +Measurements (μm) and proportions (%) of + +Setaphyes kielensis + +, including total values from the different studied populations split by sex (values per specimen and population can be found in Supplementary Table 3. Abbreviations: LTS, lateral terminal spine length; MSW5, maximum sternal width (measured at segment 5); +n +, number of measured specimens; S, segment length (followed by number of corresponding segment); Sd, standard deviation; SW10, standard sternal width (measured at segment 10); TL, total trunk length. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Character +n +Mean, Sd ♀Range ♀Mean, Sd 6Range 6Mean, Sd ♀+6Range ♀+6
MSW519♀/156152, 16.7130–200132, 13.299–145143, 18.399–200
MSW5/TL19♀/15630, 0.0330–3130, 0.0420–3630, 0.0320–36
SW1019♀/156131, 15.7103–166110, 12.884–127122, 17.784–166
SW10/TL19♀/15626, 0.0226–2725, 0.0319–2826, 0.0319–31
S119♀/15678, 8.564–9664, 6.554–7972, 10.354–96
S219♀/15649, 5.941–6343, 4.836–5147, 6.136–63
S319♀/15653, 7.142–7246, 3.840–5450, 6.740–72
S419♀/15659, 8.947–8451, 3.543–5855, 8.243–84
S519♀/15662, 6.655–7851, 2.846–5757, 7.746–78
S619♀/15664, 7.853–8552, 4.546–6158, 8.846–85
S719♀/15667, 755–8256, 3.550–6362, 7.850–82
S819♀/15669, 7.558–8858, 3.150–6264, 8.350–88
S919♀/15673, 9.262–9961, 3.855–6868, 9.355–99
S1019♀/15677, 9.352–9260, 5.654–7470, 11.552–92
S1119♀/15632, 4.925–4135, 5.822–4333, 5.522–43
LTS17♀/14646, 10.331–67137, 14.2104–16287, 47.831–162
LTS/TL17♀/1469, 0.027–1131, 0.0424–3719, 0.17–37
+ + + +Table 4 + + +Summary of nature and arrangement of cuticular elevations, spines, tubes, setae, sensory spots and nephridiopores in + +Setaphyes kielensis + +. Abbreviations: ce, cuticular elevation; LD, laterodorsal; lts, lateral terminal spine; LV, lateroventral; MD, middorsal; ne, nephridiopore; PD, paradorsal; ps, penile spine; SD, subdorsal; se, seta; ss, sensory spot; tu, tube; VL, ventrolateral; VM, ventromedial; * indicates unpaired structures; 6 and ♀ indicates sexually dimorphic characters. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
SegmentMDPDSDLDLVVLVM
1ce*ssss x2ss
2ce*se, ssssse, sssese (♀)tu (6), ss
3ce*se, ssssse, sssese, ss
4ce*se, ssssse, sssese, ss
5ce*se, ssssse, sssese, ss
6ce*se, sssssesese, ss
7ce*se, ssssse, sssese, ss
8ce*se*, ssss x2se, sssese, ss
9ce*se, ssss x2se, ssse, nese, ss
10ss x2se
11ltsps x2 (6)
+ + +Segment 2 with middorsal elevation as on the preceding segment ( +Figs 9B +; +10B +). Setae in paradorsal, laterodorsal and lateroventral positions; females with additional pair of sexually dimorphic ventrolateral setae ( +Figs 9A–C +; +10B–C +; +12B–D +; +13B +; +14B, D +). Males with tubes in ventromedial position ( +Figs 9A +; +12C +; +14A +). Sensory spots in paradorsal (not near the posterior margin), subdorsal, laterodorsal and ventromedial positions ( +Figs 9A–C +; +10B–C +; +12B–C +; +13B +). + + +Segment 3 with middorsal elevation as on the preceding segments ( +Fig. 9B, G +). Setae in paradorsal, laterodorsal, lateroventral and ventromedial positions. Sensory spots in paradorsal (not near the posterior margin), subdorsal, laterodorsal and ventromedial positions ( +Figs 9A–C +; +10B–C, G +; +12B, D +; +13B +; +14B +). + + +Segments 4 to 7 similar to segment +3 in +the arrangement of cuticular elevation, setae and sensory spots ( +Figs 9A–B +; +10D–G +; +12B, E +; +13B, E +; +14B–C +). + + +Segment 8 with middorsal elevation as on the preceding segments ( +Figs 9B +; +10H +). Unpaired seta in paradorsal position, at the right side of the middorsal elevation; paired setae in laterodorsal, lateroventral and ventromedial positions. Sensory spots in paradorsal (not near the posterior margin), subdorsal (two pairs), laterodorsal and ventromedial positions ( +Figs 9A–B +; +10H–I +; +12E +; +13C +). + + +Segment 9 with middorsal elevation as on the preceding segments ( +Figs 2B +; +10H +). Setae in paradorsal, laterodorsal, lateroventral and ventromedial positions. Sensory spots in paradorsal (not near the posterior margin), subdorsal (two pairs), laterodorsal, and ventrolateral positions ( +Figs 9A–B, D +; +10H–I +; +12G +; +13F +). Nephridiopores as small opening surrounded by short tubes in lateroventral position ( +Fig. 10I +). + + +Segment 10 without middorsal cuticular specialization. Setae in lateroventral position. Two pairs of sensory spots in subdorsal position ( +Figs 9A–B, D +; +10I +; +12G–H +; +13F +). Tergal plate with rounded posterior margin; posterior margins of sternal plates straight in females, more pointed in males. + + +Segment 11 without middorsal cuticular specialization. Males with two lateral pairs of stout, thick penile spines and with one pair of collapsed tubes terminating in penile bristles ( +Figs 9A +; +10K +; +12I +). Short lateral terminal spines, longer in males than in females (males LTS:TL average ratio 31.43 %; females LTS:TL average ratio 9.0 1 %) ( +Figs 9A–B, D +; +10J–K +; +12F–H +). + + +3.2.4. Intraspecific variation +Due to the preservation conditions of the material, the arrangement + +of sensory spots throughout the trunk could not be fully confirmed in all the examined specimens from +Sylt +( +North Frisia +). +The +remaining cuticular characters of taxonomic relevance for pycnophyids (i.e. setae, middorsal cuticular specializations, spines, glandular cell outlets, and ornamentation) could be examined in detail both in the +Anatolian +( +four females +) and the +North Frisian +( +14 males +and +12 females +; +ZMB 12364–12365 +were only studied for this purpose) populations + +. + + +Anatolian population: + +Deviations from the common pattern of paradorsal setae distribution in segment 5 were observed in +one female +from +Yesilirmak River +mouth, with a single paradorsal seta present on one side of the middorsal elevation, only one seta of the laterodorsal pair commonly present on segment 5, and an unpaired paradorsal seta on segment 7 ( +ZMB 12741 +) + +. + +Segment +8 in +two female +specimens off +Sakarya +river mouth ( +ZMB 12741 +, +12744 +) + + +with the paradorsal seta on the left side of the middorsal elevation. The laterodorsal pair of setae on segment 9 could not be confirmed in +two females +( +ZMB 12743 +, +12744 +) + +. + + +North Frisian population: + +Deviations from the described bilateral pattern were observed in several specimens, both for seta and sensory spot distribution.Segment 2 with double laterodorsal setae on one side in +two females +( +ZMB 12454 +, +Fig. 14D +; +ZMB 12475 +, +Fig. 14B +) and absent on one side in +one male +( +ZMB 12463 +) + +; + +lateroventral seta absent on one side in +one female +( +ZMB 12467 +) + + +and +one female +( +ZMB 12474 +) + +; + +ventrolateral setae absent in +one female +( +ZMB 12454 +) + +; + +both ventromedial tube and seta present on one sternal plate in +one male +( +ZMB 12457 +) + +. + +Segment 3 without the laterodorsal seta on one side in +five males +( +ZMB 12457 +, +12461 +, +12463 +, +12468 +, +12472 +) + + +and +six females +( +ZMB 12454 +, +12460 +, +12467 +, +12471 +, +12476 +, +12478 +) + +; + +with minute laterodorsal seta on one side in +four males +( +ZMB 12458 +, +12462 +, +12470 +, +12477 +) + + +and +four females +( +ZMB 12456 +, +12464 +, +12465 +, +12469 +) + +; + +with triple laterodorsal seta in +one female +( +ZMB 12475 +, +Fig. 14B +) + +; + +ventromedial seta on one sternal plate absent in +one female +( +ZMB 12460 +) + +; + +with minute ventromedial setae on both sternal plates in +one male +( +ZMB 12461 +) + +; + +with minute ventromedial seta on one sternal plate in +four males +( +ZMB 12462 +, +12463 +, +12468 +, +12470 +) + +; + +typical male tube of the segment 2 present on one sternal plate in +one male +( +ZMB 12458 +; +Fig. 14A +) + +; + +laterodorsal sensory spot absent on one side in +three males +( +ZMB 12455 +, +12457 +, +12472 +) + + +and +one female +( +ZMB 12475 +) + +. + +Segment 4 without laterodorsal seta on one side in +one male +( +ZMB 12477 +) + +; + +lateroventral seta absent on one side in +one female +( +ZMB 12476 +) + +; + +laterodorsal sensory spot of one side located more dorsally than the laterodorsal seta in +one male +( +ZMB 12457 +) + +. + +Segment 5 without the paradorsal seta on one side of the middorsal elevation in +two females +( +ZMB 12474 +, +12476 +) + +; + +laterodorsal seta absent on one side in +one male +( +ZMB 12457 +) + +; + +with two pairs of lateroventral setae on one side in +one female +( +ZMB 12475 +) + +; + +with ventrolateral seta on one side instead of the common lateroventral seta in +one female +( +ZMB 12456 +) + +; + +with two pairs of lateroventral setae in +one female +( +ZMB 12464 +) + +; + +with double ventromedial setae on one sternal plate in +one male +( +ZMB 12470 +; +Fig. 14C +) + +; + +with a single paradorsal sensory spot on the middorsal elevation in +one male +( +ZMB 12477 +) + + +and +one female +( +ZMB 12474 +) + +; + +without one subdorsal sensory spot in +one female +( +ZMB 12467 +) + +; + +without one laterodorsal sensory spot in +seven males +( +ZMB 12455 +, +12458 +, +12461 +, +12468 +, +12470 +, +12472 +, +12477 +) + + +and +eight females +( +ZMB 12456 +, +12465 +, +12467 +, +12469 +, +12471 +, +12474 +, +12476 +, +12478 +) + +. + +Segment 6 without laterodorsal seta on one side in +one male +( +ZMB 12457 +) + +; + +lateroventral seta on one side absent in +one male +( +ZMB 12457 +) + + +and +one female +( +ZMB 1469 +) + +; + +with three pairs of lateroventral setae on one side in +one female +( +ZMB 12475 +) + +; + +ventrolateral seta on one sternal plate in +one male +( +ZMB 12457 +) + +; + +subdorsal sensory spot on one side absent in +one male +( +ZMB 12457 +) + +. + +Segment 7 with only an unpaired paradorsal seta on one side of the middorsal elevation in +two males +( +ZMB 12365 +, +ZMB 12367 +) and +one female +( +ZMB 12464 +) + +; + +with a single paradorsal sensory spot on one side in +one female +( +ZMB 12464 +) + +; + +without the paradorsal pair of sensory spots in +one female +( +ZMB 12474 +) + +; + +without laterodorsal sensory spot on one side in +two males +( +ZMB 12462 +, +12472 +) + + +and +one female +( +ZMB 12478 +) + +. + +Segment 8 with the paradorsal seta on the left side of the middorsal elevation in +four males +( +ZMB 12367 +, +12463 +, +12470 +, +12472 +) + + +and +five females +( +ZMB 12465 +, +12469 +, +12474–12476 +) + +; + +lateroventral seta absent on one side in +one male +( +ZMB 12458 +) + + +and +two females +( +ZMB 12454 +, +12471 +) + +; + +paradorsal sensory spots absent in +one female +( +ZMB 12476 +) + +; + +laterodorsal sensory spot on one side absent in +one male +( +ZMB 12462 +) + + +and +two females +( +ZMB 12454 +, +12475 +) + +. + +Segment 9 with a single paradorsal seta present on one side of the middorsal elevation in +one female +( +ZMB 12464 +) + +; + +with minute laterodorsal seta on one side in +two males +( +ZMB 12461 +, +12472 +) + + +and +one female +( +ZMB 12476 +) + +; + +laterodorsal pair absent in +one male +( +ZMB 12462 +) + +; + +laterodorsal seta absent on one side in +two females +( +ZMB 12464 +, +12465 +) + +; + +paradorsal sensory spots absent in +one female +( +ZMB 12476 +) + +; + +without laterodorsal sensory spot on one side in +one female +( +ZMB 12475 +) + +; + +without the ventrolateral sensory spot on one sternal plate but with a ventromedial sensory spot in +one male +( +ZMB 12470 +) + +. + +Segment 10 with a ventrolateral seta on one sternal plate and without the lateroventral one in +one female +( +ZMB 12475 +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4D/87/374D87FDB008FFF5FCCFFB80D7503238.xml b/data/37/4D/87/374D87FDB008FFF5FCCFFB80D7503238.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0f4b203cdb5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4D/87/374D87FDB008FFF5FCCFFB80D7503238.xml @@ -0,0 +1,812 @@ + + + +The genus Setaphyes (Kinorhyncha, Pycnophyidae) in European waters: Redescription of Setaphyes dentatus (Reinhard, 1881) and Setaphyes kielensis (Zelinka, 1928), including notes on morphometrics, sexually dimorphic features and reproduction of the genus + + + +Author + +González-Casarrubios, Alberto + + + +Author + +Cepeda, Diego + + + +Author + +Neuhaus, Birger + + + +Author + +García-Cobo, Marta + + + +Author + +Pardos, Fernando + + + +Author + +Ürkmez, Derya + + + +Author + +Sánchez, Nuria + +text + + +Zoologischer Anzeiger + + +2023 + +2023-03-31 + + +303 + + +90 +111 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2022.12.004 + +journal article +10.1016/j.jcz.2022.12.004 +1873-2674 +8164206 + + + + + + +3.1. Redescription of + +Setaphyes dentatus ( +Reinhard, 1881 +) + + + + + + + +Figs 2–8 +, +Tables 1–2. + + + + +3.1.1. Diagnosis + + + +Setaphyes + +with anterior margin of the tergal plate on segment 1 finely denticulated, posteriorly followed by a transverse area of minute cuticular, net-like ridges. Middorsal elevations on segments 2–6, and middorsal processes on segments 1 and 7–9. Posterior end of middorsal structures covered by tufts of elongated, thick hairs whose tips usually surpass the posterior segment margin. Unpaired paradorsal setae on segments 2–9, alternating left and right position along the trunk and showing intraspecific variability but without any specific pattern. Laterodorsal setae on segments 3, 5 and 7. Lateroventral setae on segments 2–10. Ventromedial setae on segments 4–5 and +7–8 in +males and 3–5 and +7–9 in +females. Patch of conspicuous longitudinal cuticular ridges on segment 10, from laterodorsal to ventrolateral positions. Lateral terminal spines short, slender (males LTS:TL average ratio 21.2 %; females LTS:TL average ratio 15.7 %; males and females average ratio 17.8 %). + + + + +3.1.2. Examined material + + + +For +light microscopy, +136 adult +specimens, +53 males +and +83 females +, were studied from 17 populations belonging to eight marine ecoregions ( +ZMB 12408–12418 +, +12616–12740 +; see +Supplementary Table I +). +Of +those, +four females +from the +Anatolian Peninsula +are new records for the region. 11 additional adult specimens were examined with SEM: + + +one adult +specimen from the +Anatolian Peninsula +(indeterminate sex: +ZMB 12745 +; station YSL09 +R2 +; + +13 July 2019 + +, 41 + +Ǫ +24.738 + +′ +N, 036 + +Ǫ +39.210 + +′ +E, + +76 m +depth + +; collector: +Derya Ürkmez +), + + +10 from the Iberian Peninsula, collected by +F. Pardos +, M. Herranz and +N. Sanchez +´( +one female +ZMB 12746 +, +one male +ZMB 12747 +, and +three adults +ZMB 12748–12750 +of indeterminate sex from Algeciras, + +8 February 2011 + +, 36 + +Ǫ +10.741 + +′ +N, 005 + +Ǫ +23.243 + +′ +W, 8 depth; + + +two females +ZMB 12754 +and 12755 from Huelva, + +12 April 2011 + +, 37 + +Ǫ +08.324 + +′ +N, 007 + +Ǫ +20.308 + +′ +W, + +15 m +depth + +; one additional female +ZMB 12753 +, and two indeterminate sex, +ZMB 12751 + + +and +ZMB 12752 +, from Huelva, + +11 April 2011 + +, 37 + +Ǫ +10.963 + +′ +N, 007 + +Ǫ +16.549 + +′ +W, + +11 m +depth + +) + +. + + + + +Fig. 2. +Line art illustration of + +Setaphyes dentatus +. + +A: Male, ventral view; B: Male, dorsal view; C: Female, segments 1–3, ventral view; D: female, segments 9–11, ventral view. Scale bar: 100 μm. Abbreviations: ap, apodeme; co, cuticular ornamentation, reticular, net-like structure; cr, cuticular ridge; cs, cuticular scar; cw, cuticular wrinkles; dpl, dorsal placid; ica, intracuticlular atria; ldse, laterodorsal setae; ldss, laterodorsal sensory spot; lts, lateral terminal spine; lvse, lateroventral setae; mde, middorsal elevation; mdp, middorsal process; ms, muscular scar; ne, nephridiopore; pcr, patch of cuticular ridges; pdse, paradorsal setae; pdss, paradorsal sensory spot; ps, penile spine; sdss, subdorsal sensory spot; spf, secondary pectinate fringe; vlse, ventrolateral setae; vlss, ventrolateral sensory spot; vmse, ventromedial setae; vmtu, ventromedial tube; vmss, ventromedial sensory spot; vpl, ventral placid. + + + + +Fig. 3. +Diagram of mouth cone and introvert in + +Setaphyes dentatus + +showing the distribution and type of scalids by ring and sector. Abbreviations:? position of inner oral styles not revealed; S, sector followed by number of sector. + + + + +3.1.3. Description + + +See +Table 1 +and Supplementary Table III for measurements and dimensions and +Table 2 +for location of middorsal cuticular specializations, setae, tubes, nephridiopores and sensory spots. + + +Ring 00 of mouth cone with nine, equally sized outer oral styles composed of a single, flexible unit, wider at base, with a fringed sheath, tapering progressively toward the distal, pointed tip ( +Figs. 3 +; +4D +). Outer oral styles located anterior to each introvert sector, except in the middorsal position (sector 6) where a style is missing ( +Fig. 3 +). Inner rings of mouth cone not observed, herein details on the morphology and distribution of inner oral styles are not provided. + + +Introvert with six rings of spinoscalids and 10 longitudinal sectors, each limited by the position of two adjacent primary spinoscalids ( +Figs 3 +; +4A +; +5A–D +). Ring 01 with 10 primary spinoscalids, conspicuously larger than the other ones; primary spinoscalids composed of a basal, rectangular, wide sheath and a distal, elongated, flexible, distally pointed end-piece; basal sheath equipped with a row of elongated fringes, longer in the middle region of the spinoscalid than on the lateral margins ( +Figs 3 +; +4A +; +5A–C +). Ring 02 with 10 spinoscalids, arranged medially in each sector; spinoscalids on this and following rings are also composed of a basal, rectangular, wide sheath and a distal, elongated, flexible, distally pointed end-piece; basal sheath appears hairy at its proximal end and terminates into a short fringe ( +Figs 3 +; +4A +; +5A–B +). Ring 03 with 20 spinoscalids, arranged as two in each sector ( +Figs 3 +; +4A +; +5A–B +). Ring 04 with 10 spinoscalids, arranged medially in each sector ( +Figs 3 +; +4A +; +5A–B +). Ring 05 with 20 spinoscalids, arranged as two in each sector ( +Figs 3 +; +4A +; +5A–B +). Ring 06 with four, smaller spinoscalids, arranged medially in sectors 1, 3, 6 and 9 ( +Figs 3 +; +4A +; +5A–B +). The location of spinoscalids throughout rings 02–06 follows a strict pattern around the introvert: sectors 1, 3, 6 and 9 bear seven spinoscalids, while the remaining sectors carry six spinoscalids ( +Figs 3 +; +4A +; +5A–B +). + + +A ring of 14 hairy trichoscalids present posterior to the spinoscalid rings, arranged as two in the odd-numbered sectors (except sector 1 with a single trichoscalid) and one in the even-numbered sectors of the introvert ( +Figs 3 +; +4A +; +5A–B, D +). + + +Neck with four dorsal and two ventral sclerotized placids ( +Figs 2A–B +; +4B–C +; +5D +). Dorsal placids rectangular, mesial ones broader (ca. 24 μm wide at the base) than lateral ones (ca. 22 μm wide at the base) ( +Figs 2B +; +4B +; +5D +). Ventral placids (ca. 22–23 μm wide at the base) similar to the dorsal ones but much more elongated, becoming thinner towards the lateral sides ( +Figs 2A, C +; +4C +). + + +Trunk with eleven segments ( +Figs 2 +AB; 6AF). Segment 1 with one tergal, two episternal and one trapezoidal, midsternal plate; remaining segments with one tergal and two sternal cuticular plates ( +Figs 2 +AD; 4B–C, F–G; 6A–F). Sternal plates reaching their maximum width at segment 7, almost constant in width throughout the trunk, progressively tapering at the last trunk segments. Sternal cuticular plates relatively narrow (MSW-5:TL average ratio = 24 %). Middorsal elevations on segments 2–6, rectangular, narrow, distally blunted, not projecting beyond the posterior margin of segments ( +Figs 2B +; +4B, F +; +6A, C +; +7C–D +; +8B +). Middorsal processes on segments 1 and 7–9, similar in morphology but exceeding the posterior margin of segment ( +Figs 2B +; +4B, F +; +6A, E +; +7B, F–G +; +8H +). Paradorsal butterfly to trident-like intracuticular atria associated to middorsal structures ( +Figs 2B +; +4B, F +). Lateral margin of middorsal structures surrounded by short, thick cuticular hairs; and posterior ends covered by tufts of elongated, thick hairs whose tips usually surpass the posterior margin of segment ( +Figs 2B +; +7C–D, F–G +; +8B +) (those of segment 1 remarkably shorter). Middorsal processes progressively longer towards the posterior segments, reaching their maximum length on segment 9 +Figs 2B +; +4F +; +6E +; +7F–G +; +8H +). Cuticular scars (likely glandular cell outlets) as minute, dot-shaped, rounded to oval perforations throughout the cuticle on segments 1–11 ( +Figs 2A–D +; +4B–C, F–G +), also present at the base of the middorsal processes and elevations; the number and arrangement of these structures vary greatly among the specimens, not showing any clear pattern. Up to two pairs of cuticular ridges in subdorsal (one pair) and laterodorsal (one pair) positions on segments 2–4; an unpaired middorsal cuticular ridge and up to three pairs in subdorsal (one pair) and laterodorsal (two pairs) positions on segments 5–10; one pair of ventrolateral cuticular ridges on segments 2–10, with adjacent, minute glandular cell outlets ( +Fig. 2A–D +). Conspicuous reticulate pattern of cuticular wrinkles, as a net-like ornamentation, across the most anterior dorsal and ventrolateral margins, at the overlapping area between following segments, on segments 2–10 ( +Figs 2A–D +; +4B–C, F–G +). Cuticular hairs acicular, non-bracteate, scattered throughout the trunk on segments 1–10, except in ventromedial position, denser at the tergosternal junctions, not following any particular pattern. Pachycycli and ball-and-socket joints conspicuous on segments 2–8, reduced on most posterior segments ( +Fig. 2A–D +). Apodemes on segments 9–10 ( +Figs 2A–B, D +; +4F–G +). Primary pectinate fringes finely serrated ( +Figs 6A–F +; +8B–C, E, G–H +); secondary pectinate fringes as a wavy, quite inconspicuous single line in laterodorsal and ventrolateral positions at the anterior most region of the segments ( +Figs 2A +; +8E +). Muscular scars as rounded to oval, hairless areas in laterodorsal and ventromedial positions on segments 1–10 ( +Fig. 2A–D +). + + +Segment 1 with anterior dorsal margin finely denticulated, posteriorly followed by a transverse area of cuticular wrinkles forming a net-like band, broader towards the lateral than in the middle region ( +Figs 2B +; +4B +; +5D +; +7A–B +). Anterolateral margins of the tergal plate as short, wide, distally rounded extensions ( +Figs 2A–C +; +6B +). Middorsal process with paradorsal, butterfly to trident-like atria of associated paradorsal sensory spots located near the posterior margin of the segment ( +Figs 2B +; +4B +). Anterior margin of episternal plates with a pair of ridges forming small, quadrangular depressions; anterior margin of midsternal plate with a single, large rectangular depression ( +Figs 2A, C +; +4C +). Episternal plates with usually five, scattered, minute, dot-shaped glandular cell outlets forming a quincunx ( +Figs 2A, C +; +4C +). Trapezoidal midsternal plate, wider at the base (ca. 34 μm wide at the most anterior margin, ca. 56 μm wide at the most posterior margin; average ratio = 61 %), with wavy lateral margins at the middle region ( +Figs 2A, C +; +4C +). Sensory spots present in paradorsal, subdorsal, laterodorsal and ventrolateral positions ( +Figs 2A–C +; +6A–B +). Sensory spots on this and following segments as oval areas with an oval area of cuticular micropapillae surrounding a single pore ( +Figs 7E +; +8D–E +). + + + +Fig. 4. +Light micrographs of females (ZMB 12617: A, D; ZMB 12409: B–C, F–H) and male (ZMB 12418: E, I) of + +Setaphyes dentatus + +from Sylt. A: Sector 1 (midventral) of the introvert; B: Dorsal view on segments 1–5; C: Ventral view on segments 1–6; D: Mouth cone, outer oral styles (ring 01); E: Cuticular ornamentation on segment 10. Note that punctuate appearance represents preservation artefact. F: Dorsal view on segments 5–11; G: Ventral view on segments 6–11. H: Female LTS; I: Male LTS. Lambda symbols (Λ) mark anterior attachment points of spinoscalids on introvert (A). Abbreviations: co, cuticular ornamentation; cs, cuticular scars; dpl, dorsal placid; ldse, laterodorsal setae; lts, lateral terminal spine; lvse, lateroventral setae; mde, middorsal elevation; mdp, middorsal process; oos, outer oral style; pcr, patch of cuticular ridges; pdse, paradorsal setae; ps, penile spine; psp, primary spinoscalid; sp, spinoscalid (followed by the number of corresponding ring); ts, trichoscalid; vlse, ventrolateral setae; vmse, ventromedial setae; vpl, ventral placid. Numbers after abbreviations indicate the corresponding segment. + + + + +Fig. 5. +SEM photographs of the head of + +Setaphyes dentatus + +(ZMB 12751). A: Introvert sector 1 (midventral); B: introvert sector 10 (ventrolateral); C: detail of introvert ring 01 showing the primary spinoscalid morphology; D: detail of neck (dorsal view) and anterior half of segment 1 tergal plate with focus on its cuticular ornamentation. Abbreviations: bs, basal sheath; co, cuticular ornamentation; dpl, dorsal placid; ep, end-piece of spinoscalid; psp, primary spinoscalid; S1, segment 1; sp, spinoscalid (followed by number of corresponding ring); ts, trichoscalid. Lambda symbols (Λ) mark attachment points of scalids. + + + +Segment 2 with middorsal elevation with paradorsal, butterfly to trident-like atria of associated paradorsal sensory spots (near the posterior margin) ( +Figs 2B +; +4B +; +6A +; +7 C +), surrounded by tufts of elongated, thick hairs with tips usually surpassing the posterior segment margin ( +Figs 6A +; +7C +). Unpaired seta in paradorsal position, and paired setae in lateroventral position; females with sexual dimorphism, an additional, pair of setae in ventrolateral position lacking in males. Males with sexually dimorphic tubes in ventromedial position lacking in females( +Figs 2A, C +; +8A +). Sensory spots in paradorsal (near the posterior margin), subdorsal, laterodorsal and ventromedial positions ( +Figs 2A–C +; +4B–C +; +6A–B +; +7C +). + + +Segment 3 with middorsal elevation as on the preceding segment ( +Figs 2B +; +4B +; +6A +; +7D +). Unpaired seta in paradorsal position, and paired setae in laterodorsal and lateroventral positions. Females with an additional, pair of setae in ventromedial position, more mesial than the ventromedial sensory spots. Sensory spots in paradorsal (near the posterior margin), subdorsal, laterodorsal and ventromedial positions; ventromedial sensory spots present in females only ( +Figs 2A–C +; +4B–C +; +6A–B, D +; +7D +). + + + +Fig. 6. +SEM photographs of female (ZMB 12746: B, D, F) and adult of indeterminate sex (ZMB 12750: A, C, E) of + +Setaphyes dentatus + +from the Mediterranean coast of the Iberian Peninsula, Algeciras population. A: dorsal view of segments 1–4; B: ventral view of segments 1–3; C: dorsal view of segments 4–7; D: ventral view of segments 3–7; E: dorsal view of segments 7–10; F: ventral view of segments 8–10. Abbreviations: ldse, laterodorsal setae; lts, lateral terminal spine; lvse, lateroventral setae; mde, middorsal elevation; mdp, middorsal process; pdse, paradorsal setae; ppf, primary pectinate fringe; vlse, ventrolateral setae; vmse, ventromedial setae. Numbers after abbreviations indicate the number of the corresponding segment. Dashed circles mark sensory spots. + + + + +Fig. 7. +SEM photographs of two females (110412 Huelva_sp1: A; 110412 Huelva_sp2: B, D; specimens damaged during study and not deposited) from Huelva and adults of indeterminate sex of + +Setaphyes dentatus + +from Huelva (ZMB 12751: E; ZMB 12752: F), and Algeciras (ZMB 12750: C; G) populations. A: detail of the reticular, net-like ornamentation on the dorsal, anterior margin of segment 1; B: middorsal to lateroventral view of segment 1; C: middorsal elevation of segment 2; D: middorsal elevation of segment 3; E: detail of laterodorsal sensory spot of segment 1; F: middorsal view of segments 8–9; G: middorsal process of segment 9. Abbreviations: co, cuticular ornamentation; mde, middorsal elevation; mdp, middorsal process; pdse, paradorsal setae. Numbers after abbreviations indicate the corresponding segment. Dashed circles mark sensory spots. + + + +Segment 4 with middorsal elevation as on the preceding segments ( +Figs 2B +; +4A +; +6A, C +). Unpaired seta in paradorsal position, and paired setae in lateroventral and ventromedial positions. Paired sensory spots in paradorsal (near the posterior margin), subdorsal, laterodorsal and ventromedial positions ( +Figs 2A–B +; +4B–C +; +6A, C–D +), the latter more lateral than the ventromedial setae. + + +Segment 5 with middorsal elevation as on the preceding segments ( +Figs 2B +; +4B, F +; +6C +; +8B +). Unpaired seta in paradorsal position, and paired setae in laterodorsal, lateroventral and ventromedial positions; laterodorsal setae longitudinally aligned with those of segment 3. Laterodorsal setae longitudinally aligned with those of segment 3. Paired sensory spots in paradorsal (near the posterior margin), subdorsal, laterodorsal and ventromedial positions ( +Figs 2A–B +; +4B–C +; +6C–D +; +8B–D +), the latter more lateral than the ventromedial setae. + + +Segment 6 with middorsal elevation as on the preceding segments ( +Figs 2B +; +4F +; +6C +; +8B +). Unpaired seta in paradorsal position, and paired in lateroventral position. Paired sensory spots in paradorsal (near the posterior margin), subdorsal, laterodorsal and ventromedial positions ( +Figs 2A–B +; +4C, F–G +; +6C–D +; +8B–C, F +). + + +Segment 7 with middorsal process extending beyond the posterior margin of segment ( +Figs 2B +; +7F +). Similar to segment +5 in +the arrangement of setae and sensory spots ( +Figs 2A–B +; +4F–G +; +6C–E +; +8C, E +). + + +Segment 8 with middorsal process longer than that of the preceding segment ( +Figs 2B +; +4F +; +7F +). Similar to segment +4 in +the arrangement of setae and sensory spots ( +Figs 2A–B +; +4F–G +; +6E–F +). + + +Segment 9 with middorsal process longer than that of the preceding segment ( +Figs 2B +; +4F +; +6E +; +7F–G +; +8H +). Unpaired seta in paradorsal position, and paired in lateroventral position; females with an additional pair of setae in ventromedial position lacking in males ( +Figs 2A–B, D +; +4G +; +6F +). Sensory spots in paradorsal (near the posterior margin), subdorsal, laterodorsal, and ventrolateral positions ( +Fig. 2A–B, D +). Nephridiopore as small opening surrounded by short tubes in lateroventral position. + + +Segment 10 without middorsal cuticular specialization. Setae in lateroventral position ( +Figs 2A, D +; +6F +; +8H +). Sensory spots in subdorsal, laterodorsal and ventrolateral positions, the two latter between patches of conspicuous, parallel cuticular ridges, extending throughout the laterodorsal to ventrolateral areas ( +Figs 2A, D +; +4E, G +; +8G–H +). Tergal plate with rounded posterior margin; sternal plates distally straight in females, more pointed in males. + + +Segment 11 without middorsal cuticular specialization. Males with two pairs of stout, thick penile spines ( +Figs 2A +; +4E +). Short lateral terminal spines, longer in males than in females (males LTS:TL average ratio 21.21 %; females LTS:TL average ratio 15.66 %) ( +Figs 2A–B, D +; +4H–I +; +6E–F +; +8G +). + + +3.1.4. Intraspecific variation + + +Due to the preservation conditions of the studied material, the pattern of sensory spots throughout the trunk could not be fully confirmed in all the LM specimens. The remaining cuticular characters of taxonomic relevance for pycnophyids (i.e. setae, middorsal cuticular specializations, spines, glandular cell outlets, and ornamentation) could be examined in detail in the Anatolian population ( +four females +, +one adult +specimen for SEM), +North Frisian +( +three females +, +two males +), Italian ( +one adult +specimen) and Iberian (Pontevedra, +one female +, +four males +; Algeciras, +one male +, +one female +, +three adult +specimens mounted for SEM; Huelva, +one adult +specimen mounted for SEM; and Tarragona, +four females +, +three males +) populations. + + +Anatolian population: +All specimens lack the ventromedial setae on segment 8. + + +North Frisian population: +ventromedial seta on segment 2 absent on one sternal plate in +one male +( +ZMB 12418 +); ventromedial setae on segment 6 present on one sternal plate in +one female +( +ZMB 12413 +); ventromedial setae on segment 9 absent in +one female +( +ZMB 12408 +). + + +Iberian population: +laterodorsal seta on one side of the tergal plate on segment 2 present in +one male +( +ZMB 12715 +); laterodorsal seta on segment 3 absent on one side of the tergal plate in +one male +( +ZMB 12640 +) and in one SEM specimen ( +ZMB 12751 +); laterodorsal seta on one side of the tergal plate on segment 4 present in +one female +( +ZMB 12716 +); ventromedial seta on one sternal plate on segment 4 not detected in +one male +( +ZMB 12640 +); ventromedial setae on segment 6 present in +one male +and +one female +( +ZMB 12638 +and +ZMB 12714 +) and on the lateral half of the sternal plate in +one female +( +ZMB 12716 +); ventromedial setae on segment 8 absent in +one female +( +ZMB 12643 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4D/8E/374D8EF039175C94BC32BACB40785D27.xml b/data/37/4D/8E/374D8EF039175C94BC32BACB40785D27.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6245d1c7f09 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4D/8E/374D8EF039175C94BC32BACB40785D27.xml @@ -0,0 +1,680 @@ + + + +Rediscovery of Histiotus alienus Thomas, 1916 a century after its description (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae): distribution extension and redescription + + + +Author + +Claudio, Vinicius C. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3438-911X +Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz Mata Atlantica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil +vcclaud@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Almeida, Brunna +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1225-0683 +Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz Mata Atlantica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Novaes, Roberto L. M. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1657-2807 +Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz Mata Atlantica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Navarro, Marcos A. +https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5348-0987 +Universidade Federal do Parana, Setor Litoral, Matinhos, PR, Brazil + + + +Author + +Tiepolo, Liliani M. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4488-2768 +Universidade Federal do Parana, Setor Litoral, Matinhos, PR, Brazil + + + +Author + +Moratelli, Ricardo +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0942-6633 +Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz Mata Atlantica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2023 + +2023-08-14 + + +1174 + + +273 +287 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1174.108553 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1174.108553 +1313-2970-1174-273 +71866894289C422D8E12B2DF63150E60 +40E658A549935C359371C574494741FA + + + + +Histiotus alienus Thomas, 1916 + + + +Materials examined. + + + + +Holotype + +. + +Brazil +• +1 ♀ +; +Santa Catarina state +, +Joinville +; sea level; +W. Ehrhardt +leg.; BM 9.11.19.1 + +. +Other specimens. + +Brazil +• +1 ♂ +; + +Parana +state + +, +Palmas +; +26°30'10"S +, +51°40'04"W +; + +1208 m +a.s.l. + +; +21 Nov. 2018 +; + +Vinicius +C. +Claudio + +and +Marcos A. Navarro +leg.; +21 Nov. 2018 +; in mist-net; MN 91624 + +. + + + +Distribution. + + +Histiotus alienus + +is known only from two localities in southern Brazil, one each in Santa Catarina (Joinville) and +Parana +(Palmas) states. + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Histiotus alienus + +is distinguished from all other congeners by the following combination of characters: bicolored and dark dorsal fur; ventral fur bicolored and only slightly lighter than dorsal fur; ears intermediate in size when compared to congeners (EL ~ 27.5 mm) and slightly triangular; medial lobe of ear small (WMLE ~ 4.5 mm); transverse band of skin between pinnae low, 1-2 mm high at the edges and weakly fading toward the central portion, where it is practically absent. + + + +Description. + + +Histiotus alienus + +is a medium-sized species within the genus (FL 43.3-44.5 mm; Table +2 +). Dorsal fur long (LDF ~ 11.5 mm) and bicolored, with Bone Brown bases that extend to about half the length of hairs and Light Brownish Olive tips; contrast between bands not well delimited. Ventral fur long (LVF ~ 9.5 mm) and bicolored, slightly lighter than dorsal fur, with Brownish Olive bases that extend to about half the length of hairs, and Light Yellowish Olive tips; contrast between bands visible, but not well delimited. Wing membranes naked, dark brown. Plagiopatagium attached to the base of the toe. Dorsal surface of the uropatagium slightly paler than wing membranes, almost naked. Ventral surface of the uropatagium dark brown, with scarce hairs close to the base of the tail. Ears greatly enlarged, slightly triangular, connected by a low band of skin; tragus wider at the base, slightly curved outward, long (~ 13 mm), notched, and pointed. Muzzle broad and slightly inflated. + + + +Table 2. +External and skull measurements of + +Histiotus alienus + +. Acronyms and descriptions of the measurements are available in Table +1 +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
MeasurementBM 9.11.19.1 (female), holotypeMN 91624 (male)
FL44.543.4
EL27.527.2
WMLE4.6-
MAL12.111.9
MAN6.97.1
COH4.6-
GLS18.316.9
CCL16.014.9
CIL17.0-
BAL15.2-
ZYG11.210.3
MAB9.18.9
BCB8.38.9
POB4.54.3
BAC5.04.5
BAM7.16.1
MTL6.45.8
M1M34.13.8
WFH4.1-
+ + +Skull delicate; rostrum short and flattened dorsoventrally, straight in lateral profile; braincase slightly wider than the rostrum. Posterior region of the braincase rounded, regular. Nasal opening U-shaped in dorsal view. Frontals expanded laterally towards the orbit. Sagittal and lambdoidal crests weakly developed, not connected, occipital helmet absent. Triangular, flattened bony plate weakly developed where the sagittal and lambdoidal crests connect. Zygomatic arches thin and greatly widened medially. Basisphenoid pits absent. Palate extends well beyond molars, ending in a concave posterior edge, with a weakly developed medial spine (Fig. +4 +). + + + +Figure 4. +Dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the skull of the holotype of + +Histiotus alienus + +Thomas, 1916 (BM 9.11.19.1). + + + +Dental formula I 2/3, C 1/1, P 1/2, M 3/3 ( +x +2) = 32. I1 separated, spatulate, and strongly bilobed; wide and short, with well-developed inner and outer cusps. I1 about three times the size of I2. I1not aligned to I2 on a transversal axis of the skull. I2 and C1 separated by a small gap, C1 with two slightly concave faces on the lingual region, and one slightly concave face on the labial region. P1 well developed, reaching half of C1 in height; P1 in contact with C1 and molars. M1 and M2 about the same size, almost square shaped, with W-shaped cusps. M3 reduced, triangular, with only 3 cusps. I1-I3 reduced, trilobed, and occupying the whole space between canines. P2 about three times P1 in height. Molars have well-developed cusps and decrease in size from M1 to M3. + + + +Comparisons. + + +Histiotus alienus + +most resembles + +H. colombiae + +Thomas, 1916, + +H. magellanicus + +(Philippi, 1866), and + +H. velatus + +(I. Geoffroy St.-Hilaire, 1824), from which it can be differentiated based on a series of characters. From + +H. colombiae + +, + +H. alienus + +differs in the size of the ears (>30 mm in + +H. colombiae + +and ~ 27 mm in + +H. alienus + +), development of the membrane between pinnae (poorly developed in + +H. colombiae + +and about 2 mm high at the edges and vestigial at the center in + +H. alienus + +), and length of the dorsal fur (>13 mm in + +H. colombiae + +and ~11.5 mm in + +H. alienus + +). From + +H. magellanicus + +, + +H. alienus + +differs in the size of the ears (>27 mm in + +H. magellanicus + +, usually close to 23 mm, and ~27 mm in + +H. alienus + +), width of medial lobe of ear (~3 mm in + +H. magellanicus + +and ~4.5 mm in + +H. alienus + +), shape of ears (oval in + +H. magellanicus + +and slightly triangular in + +H. alienus + +), development of the membrane between pinnae (almost absent in + +H. magellanicus + +, and about 2 mm high at the edges and vestigial at the center in + +H. alienus + +). From + +H. velatus + +, + +H. alienus + +differs in the width of medial lobe of the ears (>6 mm in + +H. velatus + +and ~4.5 mm in + +H. alienus + +), development of the membrane between pinnae (~3 mm high throughout its extent in + +H. velatus + +, and about 2 mm high at the edges and vestigial at the center in + +H. alienus + +), the shape of the ears (noticeably triangular in + +H. velatus + +and slightly triangular in + +H. alienus + +), and the length of the dorsal fur (~10 mm in + +H. velatus + +and ~11.5 mm in + +H. alienus + +). From + +H. humboldti + +Handley, 1996, + +H. alienus + +differs in the lateral profile of the skull (sharply dished in + +H. humboldti + +and flat in + +H. alienus + +), development of the membrane between pinnae (~2 mm high throughout its extent in + +H. humboldti + +, and about 2 mm high at the edges and vestigial at the center in + +H. alienus + +), and color (orangish-brown dorsal fur and light-yellowish ventral fur in + +H. humboldti + +, and dark-brown dorsal fur and slightly lighter ventral fur in + +H. alienus + +). From + +H. mochica + +Velazco et al., 2021 +, + +H. alienus + +can be easily differentiated by the pelage color and banding pattern (unicolored dorsal fur in + +H. mochica + +and bicolored in + +H. alienus + +), width of medial lobe of the ears (>9 mm in + +H. mochica + +and ~4.5 mm in + +H. alienus + +), development of the membrane between pinnae (~4.5 mm high throughout its extent in + +H. mochica + +, and about 2 mm high at the edges and vestigial at the center in + +H. alienus + +), shape of ears (noticeably triangular in + +H. mochica + +and slightly triangular in + +H. alienus + +). From + +H. cadenai + +, + +H. alienus + +differs in the size of the ears (>31 mm in + +H. cadenai + +and ~27 mm in + +H. alienus + +), development of the membrane between pinnae (poorly developed in + +H. cadenai + +, and about 2 mm high at the edges and vestigial at the center in + +H. alienus + +), shape of the ears (noticeably triangular in + +H. cadenai + +and slightly triangular in + +H. alienus + +), and color (yellowish general color in + +H. cadenai + +and dark-brown general color in + +H. alienus + +). From + +H. diaphanopterus + +Feijo +, Rocha & Althoff, 2015, + +H. laephotis + +Thomas, 1916, + +H. macrotus + +(Poeppig, 1835), and + +H. montanus + +(Philippi & Landbeck, 1861), + +H. alienus + +differs in color, with general color dark brown in + +H. alienus + +and much lighter in the other species, and with nearly white ventral fur in + +H. diaphanopterus + +, + +H. laephotis + +, + +H. macrotus + +, and + +H. montanus + +. + + + +Morphometric analysis. + +In the CVA, the first canonical variate CV1 accounts for 41.3% of the variation and is influenced by size, as observed in the loadings of all variables, which are all uniformly negative (Figs +5 +, +6 +). The plots along the axis of CV1 also reflect the differences in skull size among the species analyzed. + +Histiotus alienus + +is recovered as intermediate in size among its congeners, overlapping only with + +H. montanus + +. + +Histiotus magellanicus + +, + +H. macrotus + +, and + +H. colombiae + +have the largest skull sizes, with + +H. magellanicus + +and + +H. macrotus + +extensively overlapping in the morphospace. The smaller + +H. laephotis + +, + +H. humboldti + +, and + +H. velatus + +also extensively overlap along CV1. Along CV2 (20.2% of the variation), which has a greater influence of the shape of the skull, almost all species overlap in the morphospace; this highlights the resemblance of skull shapes among + +Histiotus + +species. Considering the correlations of CV2 (Fig. +6 +), there is an evident contrast between the POB, WFH, and BCB subset of measurements with the remaining measurements, indicating some degree of differentiation in the shape of the skull between these taxa despite the overall resemblance. + +Histiotus alienus + +is recovered as most similar to + +H. montanus + +in the morphometric analysis, which considers skull shape and size; however, these species are strikingly different in their external morphology and easily distinguished. + + + +Figure 5. +Plot of multivariate individual scores of craniometric characters in the first two canonical variates. Analyses were performed using 16 craniodental measurements. + + + + +Figure 6. +Plot of vector correlations of craniometric characters in the first two canonical variates. Analyses were performed using 16 craniodental measurements. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4D/A3/374DA385DAF8ECE5F8B10DB5AF651F2B.xml b/data/37/4D/A3/374DA385DAF8ECE5F8B10DB5AF651F2B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..290802503f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4D/A3/374DA385DAF8ECE5F8B10DB5AF651F2B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + +Polychaetes of Greece: an updated and annotated checklist + + + +Author + +Faulwetter, Sarah + + + +Author + +Simboura, Nomiki + + + +Author + +Katsiaras, Nikolaos + + + +Author + +Chatzigeorgiou, Giorgos + + + +Author + +Arvanitidis, Christos + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2017 + +5 + + +20997 +20997 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 +1314-2828--20997 + + + + +Leitoscoloplos kerguelensis (McIntosh, 1885) + + + +Notes + +Questionable status. Reported from Greece by +Akoumianaki (2004) +. In the Mediterranean also reported (questionably) from Spain / France ( +Ramos 1976b +). +Leitoscoloplos kerguelensis +is a widely reported but much confused species with several incorrect re-descriptions and many wrongly identified specimens ( +Mackie 1987 +). The species is probably restricted to the Kerguelen Islands area and the Mediterranean material belongs to +Leitoscoloplos kerguelensis +sensu Ramos, 1976 which constitutes an undescribed species ( +Blake 2017 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4D/C6/374DC62C43ABC2BAA4461150DBC6AC18.xml b/data/37/4D/C6/374DC62C43ABC2BAA4461150DBC6AC18.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..76688cb90ea --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4D/C6/374DC62C43ABC2BAA4461150DBC6AC18.xml @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part S) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +806 +877 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Seseli ammoides +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +1 + +: 260. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Lusitania." RCN: 2078. + + + + +Neotype +(Reduron in Jarvis & al. in +Taxon +55: 214. 2006): Herb. Linn. No. 367.12 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + + +Ammoides pusilla +( + +Brot.) Breistr. + +( +Apiaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4D/E0/374DE0C053335E7E4265016385CD70E8.xml b/data/37/4D/E0/374DE0C053335E7E4265016385CD70E8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aa06e07ca3c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4D/E0/374DE0C053335E7E4265016385CD70E8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828--8013 + + + + +Syrphophagus mamitus (Walker, 1837) + + + + +Encyrtus mamitus +Walker, 1837 + + +erylus +(Walker, 1838, +Encyrtus +) + + +cantabricus +(Mercet, 1921, +Microterys +) + + + +Distribution +England, Wales + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4E/AE/374EAEE867B55C6E84D05C4DA6C9A7AE.xml b/data/37/4E/AE/374EAEE867B55C6E84D05C4DA6C9A7AE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..69e34873faf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4E/AE/374EAEE867B55C6E84D05C4DA6C9A7AE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + +Checklist of Georgian centipedes (Myriapoda: Chilopoda) + + + +Author + +Kiria, Eleonora +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, K. Cholokashvilli Ave 3 / 5, Tbilisi, Georgia +eleonora.kiria.1@iliauni.edu.ge + + + +Author + +Barjadze, Shalva +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, K. Cholokashvilli Ave 3 / 5, Tbilisi, Georgia + + + +Author + +Tuf, Ivan Hadrian +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0250-0482 +Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, Slechtitelu 27, CZ- 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic + +text + + +Caucasiana + + +2023 + +2023-11-13 + + +2 + + +177 +188 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/caucasiana.2.e108535 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/caucasiana.2.e108535 +2667-9809-2-177 +006F3E468B124CFC9C786E295B7A36EB +90452B36179A5EEBBBB8670614DCB680 + + + + +34. +Lithobius taczanowski Sseliwanoff, 1881 + + + +Distribution in Georgia. + +Mtskheta +- +Mtianeti +• Stepantsminda (=Kazbegi) (48) ( +Sseliwanoff 1881 +; +Muralevitch 1926 +, +1929 +). + + + +Global distribution. + +Georgia ( +Sseliwanoff 1881 +; +Muralevitch 1926 +, +1929 +). + + + +Note. +Endemic to Georgia. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4E/FB/374EFB98448F0D5702BBB985B628F44B.xml b/data/37/4E/FB/374EFB98448F0D5702BBB985B628F44B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..57af85fdbd9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4E/FB/374EFB98448F0D5702BBB985B628F44B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Subfamily + +Dryophthorinae +Schoenherr +, 1825 + + + + + +Dryophthorides +Schoenherr +, 1825: column 588 [stem: Dryophthor-]. Type genus: +Dryophthorus +Germar, 1824 [placed on the Official List of Generic Names in Zoology (ICZN 1987c)]. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/4F/6A/374F6AE1511BEE392C5CB92D2E82AEAA.xml b/data/37/4F/6A/374F6AE1511BEE392C5CB92D2E82AEAA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fa5c4b63789 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/4F/6A/374F6AE1511BEE392C5CB92D2E82AEAA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ + + + +Studies on the Zoarcidae of the southern hemisphere. X. New records from western Antarctica. + + + +Author + +M. Eric Anderson + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2006 + +1110 + + +1 +15 + + + + +http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F40B31EF-77F0-42C8-B373-FCD07872A31A + +journal article +z01110p001 + + + + + +Bothrocara molle +Bean, 1890 + + + + + + +Bothrocara mollis +Bean, 1890: 39 + +(type locality: + +off the Queen Charlotte Islands +, +British Columbia +, +Canada + +); +Clemens & Wilby, 1949: 194 +, fig. 131. + + +Bothrocara molle +: +Clemens & Wilby, 1961: 390 +, fig. 271; +Hart, 1973: 236 +, text fig.; +Masuda et al., 1984: 309 +, pl. 275G; +Mecklenburg et al., 2002: 732 +, text fig. + + + +Bothrocaropsis alalonga +Garman, 1899: 127 + +, pl. 32, fig. 2. + + + +Bothrocara remigera +Gilbert, 1915: 366 + +(partim), pl. 20, fig. 19. + + +Lamprogrammus +sp.: +Trunov, 1999: 492 +, fig. 1. + + + + +Material examined: + +Scotia Sea off South Georgia +: + +USNM +356643 + +(4 specimens; 115-165 mm SL) and + +SAIAB +(RUSI) 60090 + +(3; 129-202 mm SL), +53°31.2'S +, +37°50.9'W +, ISLAS ORCADAS coll. UMO 7, +10 ft. beam trawl +, 1286-1293 m, + +11 May 1975 + +, +H. H. DeWitt +. + + + +USNM +356646 + +(1; 215 mm SL), +53°26.7'S +, +36°32.8'W +, +ISLAS ORCADAS coll. UMO 28 +, +10 ft. beam trawl +, 2039-2187 m, + +17 May 1975 + +, +H. H. DeWitt +. + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Bothrocara molle +is distinguished from its congeners by it long, slender gill rakers (raker ratio as percent: 163-267) and long pectoral fin, reaching almost to anus in young or just beyond it in adults. + + + +Description. Vertebrae 18-20 + 85-91 = 104-110; D 99-105; A 84-89; P 14-15; C 10; pelvics absent; branchiostegal rays 6; gill rakers 5-6 + 16-20 = 21-26; vomerine teeth 0-3; palatine teeth absent in all; pseudobranch filaments 7-10; pyloric caeca 2; gill raker ratio (as percent) 222-267; preoperculomandibular pores 8; suborbital pores 6 + 3; postorbital pores 4; supraorbital (nasal) pores 2; interorbital pore 1; occipital pores absent. Lateral line double, with dorsal branch arching across body to just posterior to anus and mediolateral branch running from just anterior to anus to tail tip. + + + +Remarks. The above synonymy, although incomplete, reflects my unpublished work on the genus +Bothrocara +, revisionary studies of which are in preparation. This species is close to +B. brunneum +with which it has long been confused. +Bothrocara molle +is known in the literature from Japan ( +Masuda et al., 1984 +) to Chile (as +Bothrocara alalonga +; +Kong and Melendez, 1991 +), thus the new specimens represent a considerable range extension. Additionally, +Trunov (1999) +reported three specimens from Meteor Seamount in the South Atlantic questionably identified as an ophidioid, +Lamprogrammus +sp., which are probably +B. molle +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/50/25/3750257AA44BD5D1E30553F013F798DF.xml b/data/37/50/25/3750257AA44BD5D1E30553F013F798DF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..afc6b125133 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/50/25/3750257AA44BD5D1E30553F013F798DF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Tribe +Deinopsini Sharp, 1883 + + + + +Deinopsini +Sharp, 1883: 294 [stem: Deinops-]. Type genus: +Deinopsis +A. Matthews, 1838. Comment: current spelling maintained (Art. 29.5): incorrect original stem formation in prevailing usage (should be Deinopse-). + + +Adinopsini +Cameron, 1919: 242 [stem: Adinopse-]. Type genus: +Adinopsis +Cameron, 1919. Comment: incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/50/D7/3750D77EDF0C0876FF4F8816FB49ED83.xml b/data/37/50/D7/3750D77EDF0C0876FF4F8816FB49ED83.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..248d2b676aa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/50/D7/3750D77EDF0C0876FF4F8816FB49ED83.xml @@ -0,0 +1,428 @@ + + + +Description and distribution of two new species of Paraonidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from a lagoon-estuarine ecosystem in the Southern Gulf of Mexico + + + +Author + +Arriaga-Hernández, Stefan + + + +Author + +Hernández-Alcántara, Pablo + + + +Author + +Solís-Weiss, Vivianne + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2013 + +3686 + + +1 + + +51 +64 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3686.1.2 +b5359040-f6fe-480a-9f4a-774b2f30d2ff +1175-5326 +284154 +DBCCE386-C7F3-4AA6-B233-AC3E44D53A19 + + + + + + + +Aricidea (Acmira) hirsuta + +n. sp. + + + + +Figures 2 +A–E, 3A–I + + + + +Material examined. + +Type +material. + +Holotype +: National Polychaete Collection, +ICML +, +UNAM +(CNP– +ICML +POH– 02–001): Station 22, +18° 39' 40.40”N +, +91° 32' 44”W +, +2.6 m +. + +Paratypes + +: National Polychaete Collection, +ICML +, +UNAM +(CNP– +ICML +POP–02–001): 7 +paratypes +, one of them coated with gold for SEM studies, Station 22, +18° 39' 40.40”N +, +91° 32' 44”W +, +2.6 m +. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales de Madrid ( +MNCN +16.01/14719): 6 +paratypes +, Station 24, +18° 34' 30”N +, +91° 29' 54”W +, +3.9 m +. Stations located in Términos Lagoon, Campeche, Southern Gulf of +Mexico +; collected +October 20, 2009 +, by P. Hernández-Alcántara. + + +Additional material +. National Polychaete Collection, +ICML +, +UNAM +(CNP– +ICML +PO–02–040), 1112 specimens: Station 18, +21 specimens +, +18° 33’ 40”N +, +91° 36’ 10”W +, + +4 m +. + +Station 22, +201 +specimens, +18° 39’ 40”N +, +91° 32’ 44”W +, +2.6 m +. Station 23, +619 +specimens, +18° 37’ 00”N +, +91° 31’ 10”W +, +3.9 m +. Station 24, +199 +specimens, +18° 34’ 30”N +, +91° 29’ 54”W +, +3.9 m +. Station 25, +5 specimens +, +18° 32’ 30”N +, +91° 28’ 39”W +, +3.8 m +. Station 26, +51 specimens +, +18° 34’ 30”N +, +91° 22’ 40”W +, +3.2 m +. Station 28, +15 specimens +, +18° 40’ 13”N +, +91° 26’ 34”W +, +3.3 m +. All the stations located in Términos Lagoon, Campeche, Southern Gulf of +Mexico +; collected +October 20, 2009 +, by P. Hernández-Alcántara. + + + + +Description. +Holotype +complete with 102 chaetigers, body length +11.82 mm +, width +0.28 mm +; +paratypes +with 61–112 chaetigers, +4.45–14.16 mm +long and +0.22–0.35 mm +wide. Body wide, dorsoventrally flattened in branchial region, cylindrical in postbranchial region ( +Figs 2 +A, 3A). Prostomium triangular, distally rounded, slightly wider than long, with no eyes ( +Fig. 2 +A). Nuchal organs as pair of oblique, deep slits. Median antenna proximally inflated, tapering to short blunt end, extending to posterior margin of prostomium ( +Figs 2 +A, 3A). Three prebranchial chaetigers ( +Figs 2 +A, 3A, B). First two notopodial postchaetal lobes short, subtriangular ( +Fig. 2 +A, 3B), cirriform from chaetiger 3 ( +Figs 2 +A, 3B), progressively longer in branchial region ( +Figs 2 +A, 3C) to long, thin, filiform in posterior region ( +Fig. 3 +E, H, I). Neuropodial postchaetal lobes absent. Ciliated branchiae arranged on dorsum, starting from chaetiger 4, 15 pairs, basally inflated, foliaceous, distally pointed, as long as body width when posterior-most ( +Fig. 3 +A, C, E). Notochaetae all slender capillaries, with numerous thin filaments on their internal margin. Neurochaetae including slender capillary and modified chaetae from chaetiger 18 ( +Figs 2 +C, D, E, 3D, F, G). Modified chaetae appearing as curved spines with blunt shaft surrounded by pubescence ( +Fig. 3 +D); pubescent filaments numerous and inserted in median and distal end of chaetae ( +Figs 2 +D, 3F); some spines with one or two distal filaments clearly longer ( +Figs 2 +C, D, 3D). Up to seven modified chaetae per neuropodium ( +Fig. 3 +G), which increase in size and decrease in number towards posterior end of body; about 14 segments before the pygidium, only one or two modified chaetae per parapodium, stouter and longer ( +Fig. 2 +B). Pygidium rounded, with three anal cirri of similar size, ventrally situated ( +Fig. 3 +H, I). + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Aricidea (Acmira) hirsuta + + +n. sp. + +(A) anterior region, lateral view; (B) posterior region, ventrolateral view; (C) modified posterior neurochaetae, redrawn from scanning electron microscopy photographs; (D) modified postbranchial neurochaetae; (E) modified medium neurochaetae, redrawn from scanning electron microscopy photographs. Scale bars: A, B 0.05 mm; C, E 5 µm, D 15 µm. + + + + +FIGURE 3 +. + +Aricidea (Acmira) hirsuta + + +n. sp. + +(A) anterior region, dorsal view; (B) notopodia 1 to 3, lateral view; (C) parapodia 2 to 6, lateral view; (D) modified medium neurochaetae; (E) branchial-postbranchial region, dorsal view; (F) modified posterior neurochaetae; (G) modified postbranchial neurochaetae; (H) posterior end, lateral view; (I) posterior end, ventrolateral view. Scale bars: A 0.2 mm; B, I 0.02 mm; C, H 0.05 mm; D, F, G 5 µm; E 0.01 mm. + + + + +Remarks. +Currently the family +Paraonidae +includes about 150 described species worldwide, of which only 17 species (including the new species described in this study) belong to the subgenus + +Aricidea (Acmira) + +. The main characters used to distinguish the different species (see Table 1) are the length and shape of the median antenna and the features of modified neurochaetae (teeth, hood, distal arista and pubescence). + +A. (Acmira) hirsuta + +n. sp. +, can be clearly distinguished from other members of this genus by the short median antenna, which reaches only to the posterior margin of the prostomium, and by the presence of curved unidentate spines with no arista or distal hood, but with dense distal and subdistal pubescence. + + +The presence of a fine distal arista, distal or subdistal pubescence, and/or a distal or subdistal hood in modified neurochaetae is a common feature in this subgenus. Most of its members (13 species) have some or all of these diagnostic characters (Table 1). In fact, + +A. (Acmira) simonae +Laubier and Ramos + +, from the Eastern Mediterranean, + +A. (Acmira) simplex +Day + +, widely distributed in the world seas, + +A. (Acmira) strelzovi +Hartmann-Schröder and Rosenfeldt + +, from +Antarctica +, and + +A. (Acmira) trilobata +Imajima + +, from +Japan +, are the only species with no hood and with curved spines entirely lacking a distal arista and pubescence. + + +Pubescence in modified chaetae is a feature less common in the subgenus; even so, in half of the described species, spines with distal or subdistal filaments of different size are present. Particularly, among the species with spines bearing pubescence but with no hood, + +A. (A.) hirsuta + +n. sp. +, can be considered close to + +A. (Acmira) mirifica +Strelzov + +, from the +Antarctic +, New +Guinea +and Southern California, + +A. (A.) horikoshi +Imajima + +, from +Japan +and California, and + +A. (A.) catherinae +Laubier + +and + +A. (A.) finitima +Strelzov + +, widely distributed in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, since they all have neuropodial spines with numerous fine filaments around the apex. But + +A. (A.) hirsuta + +n. sp. +, is distinguished from + +A. (Acmira) mirifica + +because the latter bears spines sometimes with a short distal arista and its median antenna is very long (reaching down to chaetiger 6); nevertheless, the irregular distribution found in + +A. (Acmira) mirifica + +could suggest that its records belong to a group of species rather than only to one. Besides the presence of modified chaetae starting on posterior chaetigers (27–33) and the fact that it has a narrow sheath in the convex side, + +A. (A.) horikoshi + +differs from + +A. (A.) hirsuta + +n. sp,. in having long cirriform antennae (reaching down to chaetigers 4–5) and a large number of branchiae (30 pairs). On the other hand, in the modified chaetae of + +A. (A.) catherinae + +and + +A. (A.) finitima + +, distal pubescence is also present, but they also bear an arista distally attached to the shaft. These distal aristae may be lost easily, and therefore difficult to detect ( +Gaston 1984 +; + +Montiel +et al +. 2002 + +), which could be confused for the modified chaetae present in + +A. (A.) hirsuta + +n. sp. +; however, it is clear that the spines in the new species entirely lack the distal arista or sheath. Besides, in + +A. (A.) catherinae + +the median antenna is proximally inflate, tapering to a blunt end, similar in shape to + +A. (A.) hirsuta + +n. sp. +, but longer (reaching to chaetigers 1–3), and its modified chaetae also bear a weakly expanded sheath. Finally, + +A. (A.) finitima + +can also be distinguished from the new species, because it bears dorsal papillae on the branchiferous segments, and its median antenna reaches down to chaetigers 1–3. + + + + +Etymology. + +Aricidea (Acmira) hirsuta + +is named for its particular traits linked to the presence of curved unidentate spines with no arista or distal hood, but with dense distal and subdistal pubescence. + + +Habitat. +In mud and fine sands, depth +2.6 to 4 m +, temperature 27.20 to 28.09°C, salinity 33.93 to 35.84 psu, +pH +8.2 to 9.2. + + + + +Distribution. +Central and southern regions of Términos Lagoon, southern Gulf of +Mexico +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/50/D7/3750D77EDF0F087AFF4F8A71FB81EC5C.xml b/data/37/50/D7/3750D77EDF0F087AFF4F8A71FB81EC5C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7223331ace --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/50/D7/3750D77EDF0F087AFF4F8A71FB81EC5C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,669 @@ + + + +Description and distribution of two new species of Paraonidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from a lagoon-estuarine ecosystem in the Southern Gulf of Mexico + + + +Author + +Arriaga-Hernández, Stefan + + + +Author + +Hernández-Alcántara, Pablo + + + +Author + +Solís-Weiss, Vivianne + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2013 + +3686 + + +1 + + +51 +64 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.3686.1.2 +b5359040-f6fe-480a-9f4a-774b2f30d2ff +1175-5326 +284154 +DBCCE386-C7F3-4AA6-B233-AC3E44D53A19 + + + + + + + +Paradoneis carmelitensis + +n. sp. + + + + +Figures 4 +A–C, 5A–I + + + + +Material examined. + +Type +material. + +Holotype +: National Polychaete Collection, +ICML +, +UNAM +(CNP– +ICML +POH– 02–002): Station 24, +18° 34' 30”N +, +91° 29' 54”W +, +3.9 m +. + +Paratypes + +: National Polychaete Collection, +ICML +, +UNAM +(CNP– +ICML +POP–02–002): 9 +paratypes +, one of them coated with gold for SEM studies: Station 24, +18° 34' 30”N +, +91° 29' 54”W +, +3.9 m +. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales de Madrid ( +MNCN +16.01/14720): 6 +paratypes +, Station 24, +18° 34' 30”N +, +91° 29' 54”W +, +3.9 m +. Stations located in Términos Lagoon, Campeche, Southern Gulf of +Mexico +; collected +October 20, 2009 +, by P. Hernández-Alcántara. + + +Additional material. +National Polychaete Collection, +ICML +, +UNAM +(CNP– +ICML +PO–02–041), +42 specimens +: Station 16, +3 specimens +, +March 13, 2009 +, +18° 29’ 23”N +, +91° 33’ 30”W +, +3.5 m +. Station 18, +2 specimens +, +March 13, 2009 +, +18° 33’ 40”N +, +91° 36’ 10”W +, + +4 m +. + +Station 18, +1 specimen +, +October 20, 2009 +, +18° 33' 40”N +, +91° 36' 10”W +, + +4 m +. + +Station 22, +8 specimens +, +October 20, 2009 +, 18° 39.40.40’ 30”N, +91° 32’ 44”W +, +2.6 m +. Station 23, +3 specimens +, +October 20, 2009 +, +18° 37’ 00”N +, +91° 31’ 10”W +, +3.9 m +. Station 24, +25 specimens +, +October 20, 2009 +, +18° 34’ 30”N +, +91° 29’ 54”W +, +3.9 m +. All the stations located in Términos Lagoon, Campeche, Southern Gulf of +Mexico +; collected by P. Hernández-Alcántara. + + + + +Description. +Holotype +complete with 86 chaetigers, body length +10.51 mm +, width +0.23 mm +. +Paratypes +with 42–88 chaetigers, +5.54–13.02 mm +long and +0.13–0.26 mm +wide. Body long, nearly cylindrical, slightly flattened dorsally in branchial region ( +Figs 4 +A, 5A). Prostomium conical, longer than wide, with an apical lobe retracted at the tip ( +Fig. 5 +D). Eyespots absent. Two ciliary bands limited to dorsal surface on anteriormost region of the prostomium, posterior band emerging laterally from nuchal slits and circumscribing ventral surface ( +Figs 4 +A, 5D). Ciliary bands also present on dorsum of prebranchial and branchial segments ( +Fig. 5 +D). Peristomium well developed, fused ventrally to chaetiger 1, forming lower margin of mouth. A pair of nearly longitudinal nuchal organs as deep nuchal slits, in posterior half of prostomium. First three notopodial postchaetal lobes (prebranchial chaetigers) short, conical-triangular shaped ( +Figs 4 +A, 5C); from chaetiger 4 (first branchial) they become longer, digitiform ( +Figs 4 +A, 5E), and then slightly shorter, triangular in postbranchial region; they become longer again at 9 to 11 chaetigers before the pygidium ( +Figs 4 +C, 5H). Without postchaetal lobes. Branchiae from chaetiger 4 ( +Figs 4 +A, 5A); 12 pairs, cylindrical, basally wider, distally rounded, longer than body width. Postbranchial segments bito triannulated. Notopodial modified lyriform chaetae from first branchial segment (chaetiger 4) down to 17 (in some +paratypes +to chaetigers 12–16), 1–2 chaetae per parapodium ( +Fig. 5 +F, G). Both tines of lyriform chaetae similarly thick, but one filament is clearly longer with thin tip ( +Fig. 4 +B); both filaments with spinulate inner margins ( +Fig. 5 +G). All other chaetae are long capillaries, hirsute along one margin ( +Fig. 5 +B), with a long tip. In the last 3–4 chaetigers, the number of chaetae decreases to 1–3 per ramus ( +Figs 4 +C, 5H), with one simple capillary chaeta stouter than the other accompanying simple chaetae. Pygidium rounded with two long mid-lateral cirri and one short mid-ventral cirrus ( +Figs 4 +C, 5H, I). + + + + +FIGURE 4 +. + +Paradoneis carmelitensis + + +n. sp. + +(A) anterior region, dorsal view; (B) modified forked (lyrate) chaetae from branchial segment; (C) posterior end, ventral view Scale bars: A 0.01 mm; B 10 µm; C 0.02 mm. + + + + +Remarks. +The Genus + +Paradoneis + +was erected by +Hartman (1965) +to include paraonids with notopodial modified chaetae (lyriform chaetae or simple spines) and no antenna. Nowadays, this genus is represented by 19 species, including the new species described in this study, and two subspecies ( +Aguirrezabalaga & Gil 2009 +; + +De +León-González & Díaz-Castañeda 2011 + +). + +Paradoneis lyra +(Southern) + +had been previously recorded in the lagoonestuarine systems from the southern Gulf of +Mexico +( +Hernández-Alcántara & Solís-Weiss 1991 +); however, its record is questionable, since the species was first described from shallow waters of +Ireland +(Ballynaki Harbour, Galway) ( +Southern 1914 +). Later, this species was widely reported around the world and erroneously considered cosmopolitan, since many of the more detailed descriptions of +P. l y r a +were recognized as belonging to other species ( +Mackie 1991 +). + + +On the other hand, +Aguirrezabalaga and Gil (2009) +analyzed the +Paraonidae +from the Bay of Biscay, northeastern Atlantic, describing eight new species (two of which belong to the genus + +Paradoneis + +), and made an exhaustive compilation of the diagnostic features from each + +Paradoneis + +species that had been described until then. After that, only + +Paradoneis strelzovi + +from the eastern Pacific has been described ( +De +León-González & Díaz- Castañeda 2011). + + + +FIGURE 5 +. + +Paradoneis carmelitensis + + +n. sp. + +(A) anterior region, dorsal view; (B) chaetae from first branchial chaetiger; (C) first notopodium; (D) anterior end, dorsal view; (E) branchiae from chaetigers 5 and 6; (F) modified forked (lyrate) chaetae from branchial segment; (G) detail of lyriform notochaetae; (H) posterior end, ventral view; (I) pygidium, lateroventral view. Scale bars: A 0.2 mm; B, I 0.02 mm; C, H 0.05 mm; D, F, G 5 µm; E 0.01. + + + +According to the detailed information supplied by +Aguirrezabalaga and Gil (2009) +, there are only five species of + +Paradoneis + +with three prebranchial chaetigers whose modified chaetae are exclusively lyriform on notopodia: + +P. brunnea +(Hartmann-Schröder & Rosenfeldt) + +from the +Antarctic +Ocean, + +P. forticirrata +(Strelzov) + +recorded from the Pacific Ocean, +P. l y r a +(Southern) from +Ireland +, + +P. nipponica +Imajima + +from +Japan +and + +P. perdidoensis +(McLelland & Gaston) + +recorded in Florida. Although the segment where the lyriform chaetae starts is variable, + +P. carmelitensis + +n. sp. +from Términos Lagoon ( +Table 2 +) can be separated from + +P. perdidoensis + +, + +P. nipponica + +and + +P. brunnea + +, because in all these species the modified chaetae (lyriform) always appear initially on prebranchial chaetigers (chaetigers 2 or 3), but especially because + +P. perdidoensis + +bears only 3-4 pairs of branchiae, and + +P. nipponica +has + +the highest number of branchiae among the + +Paradoneis + +species (23-26 pairs); + +P. brunnea + +bears a similar number of branchial pairs (12), but unlike + +P. carmelitensis + +n. sp. +, their branchiae are distinctly shorter, less than the segment’s width. Finally, + +P. forticirrata + +can be differentiated from + +P. carmelitensis + +n. sp. +, because of a greater number of branchial pairs are present (15–17), but mainly because its notopodial lobes in prebranchial segments are massive ( +Strelzov 1973 +). + + +In this sense, + +P. carmelitensis + + +n. sp. + +, seems only close to +P. l y r a +. However, diagnostic characters such as distribution of the lyriform notochaetae, number of branchiae and prebranchial chaetigers, shape and size of the postchaetal lobes and the presence of neuropodial hooks in posterior chaetigers, described from specimens collected far away from its +type +locality ( +Ireland +), do not necessarily correspond with the original description of + +P. lyra +( +Mackie 1991 +) + +. Thus, when we analyzed in detail the morphology of the specimens collected in Términos Lagoon, the differences observed stand out, such as the typical subdermal brown eyes (sometimes absent) of +P. l y r a +which are always lacking in + +P +. +carmelitensis + + +n. sp. + +; in addition, the postchaetal lobes of the prebranchial region are digitiform in +P. l y r a +, while in + +P. carmelitensis + + +n. sp. + +, they are triangular (wide basally). Besides, in the specimens from Términos Lagoon the branchiae are longer than the distance between the branchial bases. + + + +TABLE 2. +Diagnostic characters of + +Paradoneis carmelitensis + + +n. sp. + +based on Aguirrezabalaga and Gil (2009). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Diagnostic characters + +Paradoneis + + + +carmelitensis + + +n. sp. + +
Prebranchial chaetiger3
Branchial pairs10 to 13
+ +Branchial length Longer than body width +Notopodial lobes of prebranchial, branchial and Short, conical-triangular in prebranchial chaetigers; longer, postbranchial segments digitiform from chaetiger 4, becoming slightly shorter, triangular in postbranchial region, but lengthening again in chaetigers near the pygidium +Shape of notochaetae Forked (lyrate) +Modified notochaetae (chaetiger) 4 to 17 (12–16) +Acicular neurochaetae (chaetiger) No +Anal cirri 3: two longest mid-lateral; one short mid-ventral Number of chaetigers>82 + + + +Etymology. +The name + +carmelitensis + +is derived from the gentilitious "Carmelita", name given to the people living in the area of Términos Lagoon. + + +Habitat. +In mud and fine sands, depth +2.6 to 4 m +, temperature 25.7°C to 28.09°C, salinity 31.74 to 35.85 psu, +pH +7.8 to 9.1. + + + + +Distribution. +Center and southern regions of Términos Lagoon, southern Gulf of +Mexico +. + + + +Spatial and seasonal distribution of +Paraonidae +. + +The new species of paraonids, + +Aricidea (Acmira) hirsuta + +and + +Paradoneis carmelitensis + +, were collected only in eight stations (40%) from the 20 stations studied in Términos Lagoon. The paraonids were distributed mainly in the central and southern regions of the lagoon ( +Fig. 1 +), representing only 0.9% ( +5 specimens +) of the 527 polychaetes collected during the dry season but 43.5% (1178 specimens) of the 2708 polychaetes collected during the rainy season. + + +The spatial and seasonal distribution at the species level is also noteworthy since, during the dry season, only specimens from + +P. carmelitensis + + +n. sp. + +, were collected and only in two stations located at the southwestern end of the lagoon (Sta. 16 and 18), while during the rainy season both species were recorded, mainly in seven stations from its central and southern regions ( +Figs 1 +, +6 +). During the rainy season, the increased number of the paraonids was due almost exclusively to + +Aricidea (A.) hirsuta + + +n. sp. + +, which, with 1125 specimens, constituted 97% of the paraonids. + + +It is also interesting to note that station 18 (central region of the lagoon) was the only one where paraonids were found in both seasons, even though their densities were low (<20.7 ind./ +0.1 m +²): during the dry season only + +P. carmelitensis + + +n. sp. + +, was collected but during the rainy season both species were present ( +Fig. 6 +). + + + +FIGURE 6 +. Spatial and seasonal variation of density (ind./0.1 m²) in +Paraonidae +species from the Términos Lagoon. + + + +During the rainy season, each species displayed a different distribution pattern: + +Aricidea (A.) hirsuta + + +n. sp. + +, was found abundantly in the central region of the lagoon, whereas + +P. carmelitensis + + +n. sp. + +, was restricted to its central-oriental region. Only in three stations from the central region both species were present simultaneously: 22 (204.7 ind./ +0.1 m +²), 23 (586.8 ind./ +0.1 m +²) and 24 (232.1 ind./ +0.1 m +²) ( +Fig. 6 +); in these stations the highest densities of +Paraonidae +were also found. On the contrary, in the southern and western areas, the occurrence of paraonids decreased drastically and only + +Aricidea (A.) hirsuta + + +n. sp. + +, was collected with very low densities (1.7 to 2.5 ind./ +0.1 m +²). + + +Although + +P. carmelitensis + + +n. sp. + +, was the only species collected in both seasons, it was also the less abundant paraonid (mean = 6.01 ind./ +0.1 m +²) and its distribution was not linked significantly to any of the environmental parameters measured. On the contrary, + +Aricidea (A.) hirsuta + + +n. sp. + +, was only found during the rainy season, but its abundance variations were directly correlated to changes in salinity ( +r² +=0.74, +p +<0.05) and temperature ( +r² +=0.71, +p +<0.05). That is, in this study, the greater abundance of + +Aricidea (A.) hirsuta + + +n. sp. + +, in the middle lagoon was associated with salinities of 35.38 ups and temperatures of 27.8°C, on average. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/50/EE/3750EEDCB7607FF7E1074BDC75E68829.xml b/data/37/50/EE/3750EEDCB7607FF7E1074BDC75E68829.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d2e6900fdd1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/50/EE/3750EEDCB7607FF7E1074BDC75E68829.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Family +Priasilphidae Crowson, 1973 + + + + +Priasilphinae +Crowson, 1973a: 56 [stem: Priasilph-]. Type genus: +Priasilpha +Broun, 1893. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/51/05/3751051DD24069EC74FDAE08C1477C44.xml b/data/37/51/05/3751051DD24069EC74FDAE08C1477C44.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ed001f25dc7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/51/05/3751051DD24069EC74FDAE08C1477C44.xml @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ + + + +Nematodes from terrestrial and freshwater habitats in the Arctic + + + +Author + +Holovachov, Oleksandr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1165 +1165 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1165 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1165 +1314-2828--1165 + + + + +Enchodelus makarovae Elshishka et al., 2012* + + + +Notes + +Taymyr and Severnaya Zemlya, Russia ( +Elshishka et al. 2012 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/51/97/37519703DE3E1ECF0656D380B4748EB7.xml b/data/37/51/97/37519703DE3E1ECF0656D380B4748EB7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..37af738fa29 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/51/97/37519703DE3E1ECF0656D380B4748EB7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +A catalogue of the fishes held in the Istanbul University, Science Faculty, Hydrobiology Museum. + + + +Author + +Nurettin Meriç + + + +Author + +Lütfiye Eryilmaz + + + +Author + +Müfit Özulug + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2007 + +1472 + + +29 +54 + + + + +http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:428F3980-C1B8-45FF-812E-0F4847AF6786 + +journal article +z01472p029 + + + + + +Capoeta baliki Turan, Kottelat, +Ekmekci +& Imamoglu, 2006 + + + + + + +Inland water: +34800-17 +(9 spc.), + +16.06.2006 + +, + +Stream about 37 km south of +Bozueyuek +at road from +Bozueyuek +to +Kuetahya + +, +Eskisehir +, +39°40.894'N +30°09.239'E +, + +M. +Oezulug +, J. Freyhof + + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C51FFA3EEA6C847FDA48C3D.xml b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C51FFA3EEA6C847FDA48C3D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5cd311d3653 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C51FFA3EEA6C847FDA48C3D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1929 @@ + + + +Review of Cidariplura Butler, 1879 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Herminiinae). Part 1: the Cidariplura gladiata species complex + + + +Author + +Wu, Shipher + + + +Author + +Owada, Mamoru + + + +Author + +Wang, Min + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-09-12 + + +4668 + + +4 + + +489 +502 + + + +journal article +25468 +10.11646/zootaxa.4668.4.3 +4a792ded-d181-427a-9d49-e7ef16cc7a9a +1175-5326 +3449868 +C0D9D87E-71D6-49EE-99A6-749D694F5431 + + + + + + + +Cidariplura gladiata +Butler, 1879 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 1–10 +, +23–27 +, +34–39 +, +46–49 +) + + + + + + +Cidariplura gladiata + +Butler, 1879: 449 + + +; + +Leech, 1889: 564 + +; + +Warren, +1909 + +–1913: 415, pl. 71 k; + +Strand, 1919: 149 + +; + +Strand, 1920: 159 + +; + +Kawada, 1950: 743 + +, fig. 2090; + +Inoue & Sugi, 1958: 606 + +; + +Ogata, 1958: 191 + +, pl. 118, fig. 2478; + +Sugi, 1959: 156 + +, pl. 105, fig. 21; + +Chu & Chen, 1964: 141 + +, pl. 10, fig. 273; +Owada, 1978 +: figs 13, 16; + +Owada, 1982: 918 + +, 2: 406, pl. 224, figs 38, 39; +Owada, 1987: 42–43 +, figs 13, 236, 325; + +Poole, 1989: 252 + +; + +Wang, 1994: 397 + +, part; + +Owada, 1994: 93 + +, figs 9, 10; + +Chen, 1999: +1298-1299 + +, fig. 685, pl. 67, fig. 19; + +Owada, 2011a: 223 + +, figs 2-043-27–30; + +Owada, 2011b: 225 + +, pl. 57, fig. 8; + + +Wu +et al +, 2013: 144 + + +, figs 1, 2, 5, 6, 35, 36, 63, 68, 79. + + + + +Cidariphera + +[ +sic +] +gladiata +: + +Pryer, 1885: 55 + + +. + + + + + +Mastigophorus gladiata +: + +Leech, 1900: 629 + + +. + + + + + +Mastigophora +[ +sic +] ( +Cidariplura +) +gladiata +: + +Matsumura, 1905: 111 + + +. + + + + + +Cidariplura +(?) +gladiata +? var. +gladiatella + +Strand, 1920: 159 + + +; + +Poole, 1989: 253 + +. + + + + + +Type material. +Lectotype +of + +Cidariplura gladiata + +, ♂, +Japan +( +Owada 1994 +: fig. 9; + +Wu +et al +. 2013 + +: figs. 1–2), in +NHMUK +; +holotype +of + +Cidariplura + +(?) + +gladiata + +(?) + +var. +gladiatella + +, +♀ +, Alikang [Alishan], +Formosa +[ +Taiwan +], Sauter, +09/7. X. +( +Owada 1994 +, fig. 10), in +DEIM +. + + +Additional material examined +(196♂ +61♀ +). + +Japan +. +Fukushima +, +Tamanoyu Spa +, + +2♂ +, +3. VIII. 1968 + +, +T. Ebato +leg.; +Futamata Spa +, 1♂, + +6. VIII. 1967 + +, +T. Ebato +leg. + +; + +Tokyo +, +Mt. Takao +, 1♂, + +19. VII. 1960 + +, +T. Ebato +leg.; the + + +same locality, 1♂, + +21. VII. 1963 + +, +K. Jinbo +leg.; +Yamanashi +, +Uenohara + +, + + +250 m + +, + +6. VIII. 1977 + +, +H. Yoshiumoto +leg., +Yuzurihara +, 1♂, + +7. IX. 1945 + +, +T. Ebato +leg. + +; + +Shizuoka +, +Izu +, +Nashimoto +, 5♂, + +13. VII. 1963 + +, +K. Jinbo +leg.; the + + +same locality, + +1♂, 21 + +–22. VI. 1957, +T. Haruta +leg.; the + + +same locality, 7♂, + +10. VI. 1961 + +, 4♂ +1♀ +, + +27. VII. 1965 + +, 1♂, + +24. VIII. 1960 +, +1♂, 25 +, +VIII. 1967 + +, +T. Ebato +leg.; the + + +same locality, 2♂, + +5. VII. 1959 + +, +H. Inoue +leg.; the + + +same locality, 1♂, + +25. VII. 1960 + +, +H. Inoue +leg.; the + + +same locality, + +2♂, 29 + +–31. VII. 1957, +H. Inoue +leg.; +Izu +, +Irozaki +, + +1♂, 30 + +–31. VII. 1983, +Y. Machijima +leg.; +Haibara +, +Katsuta +, + +1♂ +, +3. VII. 1972 + +; the + + +same locality, +1♀ +, + +10. VII. 1972 + +, +NSMT3286 + + +♀ +; the same locality, 1♂, + +28. VII. 1972 + +, +NSMT3285 + +♂, T. Sakurai leg.; + +Nagano +, +Ina +, +Tera +, 4♂ +2♀ +, + +14–18. VIII. 1971 + +, +M. Owada +leg. + +; +Aichi +, Atsumi, Yamada, + + +50 m + +, 1♂, + +20. VII. 2001 + +, +H. Kobayashi +leg.; +Gifu +, +Yamagata +, +Iodo + +, +370 m +, 1♂, +15. VII. 2017 +, M. Owada leg.; + +Osaka +, +Inunakiyama +, 2♂, + +16. VI. 1972 + + +; + +Wakayama +, +Tsubaki-onsen +, 2♂, + +8. VII. 1973 + +, +K. Tanaka +leg.; +Tanabe +, +Kii-Shinjo +, +1♀ +, + +10. VI. 1972 + +, 1♂, + +17. VII. 1968 + +and 1♂, + +29. IX. 1969 + +, +S. Nakatani +leg.; +Tanabe +, +Inaricho +, 1♂, + +7. VI. 1970 + +, 1♂, + +24. VI. 1965 +and +1♂ +, +2. IX. 1970 + +, +S. Nakatani +leg.; +Mts Oto +, +Shimokawa-Osugidani +, 1♂ +1♀ +, + +22. VII. 1975 + +, 1♂, + +23. VII. 1973 + +and +1♀ +, + +21. VIII. 1973 + +, +S. Nakatani +leg. + +; + +Ehime +, +Kitauwa +, +Nametoko +, 8♂ +4♀ +, + +16. VII. 1971 + +, NSMT-MO109♂, NSMT-MO +110♀ +, +M. Owada +leg. + +; + +Kochi +, +Takaoka +, +Morigauti +, + +14♂2 + +♀, + +20–21. VII. 1971 + +, +M. Owada +leg.; +Kami +, +Befu +, 1♂ +6♀ +, + +22–23. VII. 1971 + +, NSMT-MO315♂, NSMT-MO +316♀ +, +M. Owada +leg.; +Tosa +[ +Kochi +], +Nakanohama +, 1♂, + +6. VI. 1972 + +, +Noda +leg.; +Ashizurimisaki +, 6♂, + +17. VI. 1972 + +, +Noda +leg.; +Fukuoka +, +Kashii +, 1♂, + +17. VI. 1920 + +, ex +Kubo +coll.; +Kumamoto +, +Mashiki +, +Iwatogawa + +, + + +50 m + +, 2♂, + +18. V. 2002 + +, +H. Kobayashi +leg.; +Kagoshima +, +Osumi Pen. +, +Tashiro +, +Hanase +, 1♂ +1♀ +, + +20. VIII. 1974 + +, +K. Nakatomi +leg.; +Tsushima Islands +, +Kamitsushima +, +Kuchinashidani Tunnel + +, + + +250 m + +, 1♂ +1♀ +, + +3. VII. 2011 + +, +M. Owada +leg.; +Goto Islands +, +1♀ +, + +6. IX. 1974 + +, +Y. Yoshiyasu +leg.; +Goto Islands +, Fukue Is., Mt. Nanatsudake + +, + + +100 m + +, 2♂, + +25. VI. 1996 + +, +M. Owada +leg.; +Yakushima Is. +, +Ambo +, 1♂, + +18. VII. 1973 + +, +K. Ueda +leg.; the + + +same locality, + +2♂ +, +3. VIII. 1969 + +, +I. Kishida +leg.; +Kosugidani +, 2♂, + +18. VII. 1973 + +, +K. Ueda +leg.; the + + +same locality, + +1♂, 16 + +–18. VII. 1968, +Y. Kishida +leg.; +Tokara Islands +, +Nakanoshima Is. +, +Otake +(E) + +, +220 m +, +1♀ +, +15. VI. 1993 +, M. Owada leg.; the +same locality (NE) +, + + +250 m + +, + +19. VI. 2007 + +, +M. Owada +& +T. Fukuda +leg.; +Amami-oshima Is. +, +Naze +, 2♂ +2♀ +, + +26. V. 1973 + +, +H. Makihara +leg.; +Mt. Yuwandake + +, +470 m +, +1♀ +, 22, +24. VI. 2009 +and +1♀ +, 12, +14. X. 1988 +, M. Owada leg.; the + +same locality, +3♀ +, + +6–8. VII. 1968 + +, +Y. Kishida +leg.; +Uken +, +Chuo-rindo + +, +180 m +, +2♂, 13 +, +X. 1988 +, M. Owada, leg.; Sumiyou, Kamiya, +180 m +, +1♀ +, +20. VI. 2009 +, M. Owada leg.; Okinawa Is., Kunigami, Bumi, + + +65 m + +, 3♂ +1♀ +, + +11. IX. 2008 + +, +M. Owada +& +M. Kimura +leg.; +Kunigami +, +Yona +, 1♂ +2♀ +, + +24–25. V. 1963 + +, NSMT-MO166♂, NSMT-MO +167♀ +, +Y. Arita +leg.; the + + +same locality, 4♂ +2♀ +, + +26–30. V. 1962 + +, +S. Asahina +leg.; the + + +same locality, + +5♂, 18 + +–21. X. 1973, +M. Owada +leg.; +Kunigami +, +Hiji +, + +1♂ +, +2. XII. 1994 + +, +M. Kimura +leg.; +Kunigami +, +Okuma-rindo + +, + + +200 m + +, + +1♂, 26 + +–27. V. 2000, +H. Yoshimoto +leg.; +Ogimi +, +Mt. Nekumachiji + +, + + +320 m + +, 2♂, 5, + +7. VI. 2008 + +, +M. Owada +et al +. leg.; +Ginoza +, +Matsuda +, 2♂, + +23. V. 1995 + +, +M. Kimura +leg.; +Nakijin +, +Mt. Oppadake + +, +150–250 m +, +1♀ +, +7–8. IX. 2008 +, M. Owada +et al +. leg.; Iheyajima Is., Gakiya, + + +50 m + +, + +7. V. 1994 + +, +M. Owada +leg.; +Tokashiki Is. +, +Mt. Akamayama +, + +1♂, 30 + +–31. X. 1989, +M. Owada +leg.; +Kumejima Is. +, +Mt. Uegusuku +(south) + +, + + +150 m + +, +1♀ +, + +28–30. IV. 1994 + +, +M. Owada +leg.; +Ishigaki Is. +, +Omoto +, 8♂ +1♀ +, + +23–24. IV. 1977 + +, +S. Kondo +leg.; the + + +same locality, 3♂ +4♀ +, + +30–31. VII. 1981 + +, +NSMT3298 + + +♂, +NSMT3299 + + +♀ +, +M. Owada +leg.; +Mt. Omoto + +, + + +100 m + +, 2♂, + +27. X. 2008 + +, M. +Owada +et al +. leg.; +Mt. Banna +, + +2♂, 12 + +–13. IV. 1974, +H. Makihara +leg.; the + + +same locality, 1♂, + +20. IV. 1977 + +, +S. Kondo +leg.; the + + +same locality, 1♂, 1–6, + +VIII. 1981 + +, +M. Owada +leg.; +Hirakubo +, 2♂, + +25. IV. 1977 + +, +S. Kondo +leg.; +Tomino +, 2♂, + +22. IV. 1977 + +, +S. Kondo +leg; +Iriomote Is. +, +Otomi +, 1♂, + +27. III. 1977 + +; +Otomi-rindo + +, + + +45 m + +, 3♂ +1♀ +, + +11–12. III. 2008 + +, +NSMT3301 + + +♂, +NSMT3302 + +♀ +, M. Owada & M. Kimura leg.; Otomi-rindo, +20 m +, 1♂ +1♀ +, +15. III. 1993 +, M. Owada leg.; Otomi-rindo, +10–160 m +, +4♂, 22 +–25. X. 2008, M. Owada +et al +. leg.; Urauchigawa, Daini-yamagoya-ato, +100 m +, +9–10. IV. 2010 +, M. Owada +et al +. leg.; Funaura, + + +40 m + +, +1♀ +, + +8. IV. 2010 + +, +M. Owada +et al +. leg.; +Sumiyoshi +, 1♂, + +23. III. 1974 + +, +H. Endo +leg.; +Komi +, 1♂, + +11. IX. 1972 + +, +H. Ohashi +leg.; +Sumiyoshi +, + +1♂, 24 + +–26. X. 1973, +M. Owada +leg.; +Yonaguni Is. +, +Mt. Urabudake + +, + + +180–230 m + +, + +1♂, 22 + +–24. III. 1991, +M. Owada +leg. ( +NSMT +) + +. + +Taiwan +. +Taipei +, +Wulai +, 1♂, + +3–4. X. 1977 + +, +H. Endo +leg. + +; + +Taoyuan +, +Paling +, 1♂, + +26. IV. 1982 + +, +NSMT3310 + + +♂, +N. Obayashi +leg.; +Ilan +, +Caoling +, 1♂, + +6. IV. 1982 + +, B-S. +Chang +leg. + +; + +Nantou +, +Hotso +[Lushan Spa], +1♀ +, + +29–30. IV. 1973 + +, +K. Nakatomi +leg., +Aowanda + +, + + +1,000 m + +, +1♀ +, + +9. V. 2013 + +, +NSMT3290 + + +♀ +, +M. Owada +, +L. Shih +& +Y. Chen +leg.; +Hualien +, +Juisui +, 8♂, + +5–6. VII. 1973 + +, +NSMT3289 + +♂, M. Owada leg.; Ilan, Fushan Botanical Garden, + + +700 m + +, 3♂, + +12. V. 2019 + +, +M. Owada +& +S. Wu +leg. ( +NSMT +); +Taipei +, +Chinese Culture University + +, +393 m +, 1♂, +18. IV. 2013 +, P. S. Chung leg.; Hsihsien, + + +350 m + +, +1♀ +, + +5. IX. 1991 + +, +Y. B. Fan +leg.; +Shenkeng +, 1♂, + +18. XI. 1995 + +, +Y. B. Fan +leg. + +; +Nantou +, Lianhuachi, +600 m +, 1♂, +23. VI. 2009 +, C. C. Kuo leg.; the + +same locality, 2♂, + +19. VIII. 2009 + +, +C. C. Kuo +leg.; the + + +same locality, 1♂ +2♀ +, + +12. VII. 2010 + +, +TFRI00130009 + +♂, +TFRI + + +160321 + +♀ +, +TFRI + +160547 +C. C. Kuo leg.; the + +same locality, + +1♂ +, +2. IX. 2010 + +, +TFRI + +160139 +, C. C. Kuo leg.; the + +same locality, 2♂, + +7. IX. 2010 + +, +C. C. Kuo +leg.; the + + +same locality, +1♀ +, + +29. IX. 2011 + +, +C. C. Kuo +leg.; +Pingtung +, +Mudan + +, +250 m +, 1♂, +28. IV. 2011 +, Y. C. Huang leg.; Shouka, +450 m +, +1♀ +, +1. II. 2012 +, Y. C. Lin leg.; the + +same locality, 1♂ +1♀ +, + +22. III. 2012 + +, +Y. C. Lin +leg.; the + + +same locality, 2♂, + +19. VI. 2012 + +, +Y. C. Lin +leg.; the + + +same locality, 1♂, + +15. VIII. 2012 + +, +Y. C. Lin +leg.; the + + +same locality, 2♂, + +13. IX. 2012 + +, +Y. C. Lin +leg.; +Hualien +, +Guanfu + +, +180 m +, 3♂, +6. IV. 2010 +, Y. C. Lin leg.; the + +same locality, 1♂2♂, + +12. VII. 2010 + +, +Y. C. Lin +leg.; the + + +same locality, 2♂, + +9. IX. 2010 + +, +Y. C. Lin +leg.; the + + +same locality, 1♂ +1♀ +, + +12. X. 2010 + +, +Y. C. Lin +leg.; +Taitung +, +Luanshan + +, + + +500 m + +, 1♂, + +16. VII. 2012 + +, +S. F. Huang +& +L. T. Hsieh +leg. ( +TFRI +); +Yulin +, +Tsaoling +, 1♂, + +6. IV. 1982 + +, +B. S. Chang +leg. ( +NMNS +) + +. + +Korea +. +Kyongsangpuk-do +, +Mt. Sudosan +, + +700 m + +, 1♂, + +9–12. VII. 1971 + +, NSMT-MO169♂, +K. Yamagishi +leg. ( +NSMT +) + +. + +China +. +Anhui +, +Mt +, +Huangshan +, +Wenquan +, + +600 m + +, 1♂, + +7. VI. 1999 + +, +NSMT3294 + + +♂; +Hunan +, +Chenzhou +, +Guidong +, +Qiyunshan +, + +1,100 m + +, +1♀ +, + +9. IX. 2018 + +, +NSMT3315 + + +♀ +; +Jiangxi +, +Jian +, +Anfu +, +Wugongshan + +, + + +400 m + +, 1♂ +1♀ +, + +7. IX. 2018 + +, +NSMT3309 + + +♂. +NSMT3313 + + +♀ +; +Guangdong +, +Shaoguan +, +Nanling +, 600– + +1,400 m + +, + +2♂, 11 + +–18. V. 2005, +NSMT3314 + + +♂, 3308♂, 1♂, the same locality, + +1–6. VI. 2006 + +, +NSMT3317 + + +♂; the same locality, + +1♂, 18 + +–22. VI. 2004, +NSMT3312 + + +♂; the same locality, 1♂, + +12. VI. 2010 + +, +NSMT3325 + + +♂; the same locality, + +1♂ +, +1. IX. 2003 + +, +NSMT3316 + + +♂; +Guangdong +, +Shaoguan +, +Xinfeng +, +Julianshan +, 1♂ +1♀ +, + +20. V. 2018 + +, +Huizhou +, +Nankonshan + +, + + +670 m + +, 1♂, + +22. V. 2018 + +; +Guangdong +, +Heyuan +, +Lianping +, +Tianyuan +, +Jiulianshan + +, + + +200 m + +, 1♂ +2♀ +, + +18. V. 2018 + +, +NSMT3311 + + +♀ +, M. +Wang +et al +. leg. ( +SCAU +and +NSMT +) + +. + +Vietnam +. +Ninh Binh +, +Gia Vien +, +Cuc Phuong +, + +1♂, 27 + +–29. IX. 1997, +NSMT3295 + + +♂, +M. Owada +leg.; +Cao Bang +, +Nang Oa +, nr +Mt. Pia Oac +, + +800 m + +, 1♂ +1♀ +, + +11. V. 1997 + +, +NSMT3319 + + +♂, +NSMT3206 + + +♀ +, +M. Owada +leg. ( +IEBR +and +NSMT +) + +. + + +Notes. +Owada (1987) +synonymized + +C. gladiata + +ab. +ochreimacula +Strand, 1919 +( +Type +locality: Kosempo [Jiansian], +Formosa +[ +Taiwan +]) with + +C. gladiata + +. The former should be regarded as an unavailable name according to the Code ( + +ICZN +1999 + +articles 45.5 and 45.6.2) ( +Owada, 1987 +) and the corresponding taxon was described as + +C. shanmeii +Wu & Owada, in + +Wu +et al +. (2013) + + +. After carefully examining the characters of all available material of + +C. gladiata + +complex, the variation of each species has been confirmed. The genitalia variation of + +C. gladiata + +is illustrated for males ( +Figs 34–39 +) and females ( +Figs 46–49 +). The species + +C. gladiata + +occurs sympatrically with its closely related + +C. nanling + + +sp. nov. + +in the Nanling mountain region, Shaoguan, +Guangdong +, southern +China +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +The species + +Cidariplura gladiata + +can be distinguished from + +C. nanling + +according to the shorter forewing length (12–15 rather than +16–18 mm +in both sexes); the narrowed forewing discocellular spot, the saccular process of the valva which is more separated from the remainder of the valva; the rather slender ductus bursae. Usually, + +C. gladiata + +has two or more generations per year in the southern areas in +Japan +( +Owada, 1982 +). + + + + +Distribution and phenology. +Japan +, +Korea +, +China +, +Taiwan +; +Vietnam +(new country record). The adults occur nearly whole year except Janurary. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C51FFA5EEA6CB68FA278CB1.xml b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C51FFA5EEA6CB68FA278CB1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0c3f07dd36b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C51FFA5EEA6CB68FA278CB1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,186 @@ + + + +Review of Cidariplura Butler, 1879 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Herminiinae). Part 1: the Cidariplura gladiata species complex + + + +Author + +Wu, Shipher + + + +Author + +Owada, Mamoru + + + +Author + +Wang, Min + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-09-12 + + +4668 + + +4 + + +489 +502 + + + +journal article +25468 +10.11646/zootaxa.4668.4.3 +4a792ded-d181-427a-9d49-e7ef16cc7a9a +1175-5326 +3449868 +C0D9D87E-71D6-49EE-99A6-749D694F5431 + + + + + + +Key to the species of + +Cidariplura gladiata + +complex + + + + + + + + +1a. Hindwing without ochreous spot on the tornal area; 3 +rd +segment of labial palpus segment as long as or less than +2 X +longer than the 2 +nd +............................................................................ + +C. gladiata + +subgroup, 2 + + + + +1b. Hindwing with an ochreous spot on the tornal area; 3 +rd +segment of labial palpus segment more than +3 X +longer than the 2 +nd +................................................................................... + +C. shanmeii + +subgroup, 5 + + + + + + +2a. Wing ground coloration ochreous, region between forewing antemedial and postmedial lines darker, as ochreous brown or brown, forewing discocellular spot bean-like, white or black; corpus bursae densely wrinkled longitudinally along 1/2 posterior half part...................................................................................... + +C. maraho + + + + +2b. Wing ground coloration uniformly brown to dark brown; bean-like discocellular spot always white; corpus bursae smooth.. 3 + + + + + +3a. Forewing +12–15 mm +in length; distal portion of valva and saccular process of valva close tightly; ductus bursae rather slender........................................................................................... + +C. gladiata + + + + + +3b. Forewing +16–21 mm +in length; distal portion of valva and saccular process of valva well separated; ductus bursae rather broad............................................................................................... 4 + + + + + + +4a. Forewing discocellular spot wider; forewing postmedial line distinctly incurved at subcostal region; hindwing postmedial line incurved at subtornal region; apex of saccular process truncate with sparse scale tufts................. + +C. nanling + + +sp. nov. + + + + + +4b. Forewing discocellular spot narrower; forewing postmedial line smoothly excurved at subcostal region; hindwing postmedial line straight at tornal region; apex of saccular process tapered with dense scale tufts................... + +C. luding + + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + +5a. Forewing discocellular spot white; basal part of 3 +rd +segment of labial palpus as wide as medial part; costal process and distal portion of valva close to each other; saccular process short, curved and digitiform; ductus bursae narrow and as long as corpus bursae, a pair of lateral sclerites of ductus bursae slender.............................................. + +C. shanmeii + + + + + +5b. Forewing discocellular spot yellowish-white; basal part of 3 +rd +segment of labial palpus wider than medial part; costal saccular processes and distal portion of valva separated well from each other, saccular process stout, rod-like; ductus bursae 2/ +3 X +shorter than corpus bursae, a pair of lateral sclerites of ductus bursae broader.......................... + +C. hbun + + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C51FFA5EEA6CECCFC4B89A5.xml b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C51FFA5EEA6CECCFC4B89A5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b8f13891313 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C51FFA5EEA6CECCFC4B89A5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ + + + +Review of Cidariplura Butler, 1879 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Herminiinae). Part 1: the Cidariplura gladiata species complex + + + +Author + +Wu, Shipher + + + +Author + +Owada, Mamoru + + + +Author + +Wang, Min + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-09-12 + + +4668 + + +4 + + +489 +502 + + + +journal article +25468 +10.11646/zootaxa.4668.4.3 +4a792ded-d181-427a-9d49-e7ef16cc7a9a +1175-5326 +3449868 +C0D9D87E-71D6-49EE-99A6-749D694F5431 + + + + + + + +Cidariplura gladiata +Butler, 1879 + +species complex + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +The complex comprises the generic +type +species, + +C. gladiata + +and its formerly unrecognized or not distinguished relatives. Totally seven species are recognized, with three new species described below.Two subgroups can be well-distinguished: First, the + +C. gladiata + +subgroup has no ochreous spot on the tornal area of the hindwing ( +Figs 1–16 +) and has the length of the 3 +rd +segment of the labial palpus as long as or slightly longer than that of the 2 +nd +( +Figs 23–27, 29, 31, 33 +); second, the + +C. shanmeii +Wu & Owada, 2013 + +subgroup has an ochreous spot on the tornal area of the hindwing ( +Figs 17–22 +) and has the length of the 3 +rd +segment of the labial palpus more than three times longer than the 2 +nd +( +Figs 28, 30, 32 +). The male and female genitalia within the + +C. gladiata + +subgroup are generally similar except + +C. shanmeii + +which has the saccular process of the valva distinctively smaller and shorter ( +Fig. 43 +) than in the other species ( +Figs 34–42, 44 +). + + +Note. +The species complex comprising + +C. ilana +Wu & Owada, 2013 + +, which will be reviewed in a future article, has a similar saccular process of the valva as that of + +C. shanmeii + +, but the costal process and distal portion of the valva are fused in + +C. ilana + +(see + +Wu +et al +. 2013 + +: fig. 55). + + + + +Distribution. +China +, +Japan +( +type +locality), +Korea +, +Taiwan +and +Vietnam +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C52FFA5EEA6CB67FBBA8B09.xml b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C52FFA5EEA6CB67FBBA8B09.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1205efd5bdb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C52FFA5EEA6CB67FBBA8B09.xml @@ -0,0 +1,211 @@ + + + +Review of Cidariplura Butler, 1879 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Herminiinae). Part 1: the Cidariplura gladiata species complex + + + +Author + +Wu, Shipher + + + +Author + +Owada, Mamoru + + + +Author + +Wang, Min + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-09-12 + + +4668 + + +4 + + +489 +502 + + + +journal article +25468 +10.11646/zootaxa.4668.4.3 +4a792ded-d181-427a-9d49-e7ef16cc7a9a +1175-5326 +3449868 +C0D9D87E-71D6-49EE-99A6-749D694F5431 + + + + + + +Genus + +Cidariplura +Butler, 1879 + + + + + + + +Type +species: + +Cidariplura gladiata +Butler, 1879 + +, by original designation. + + + + +Diagnosis. +The + +Cidariplura + +can be easily distinguished from most herminiine or noctuoid species based on the extraordinarily long labial palpus of the males. Similar genera with longer labial palpus in males are + +Oxaenanus + +, + +Hadennia + +, + +Mosopia + +in the Indo-Australian and Eastern Palaearctic regions. The genus + +Oxaenanus + +differs from + +Cidariplura + +by having the first segment of the labial palpus porrect directing forwards rather than upcurved along frons and lacks a clear boundary between the elongate second and third segments ( +Holloway 2008 +) rather than the clear segmentation in + +Cidariplura + +. + +Hadennia + +and + +Mosopia + +have remarkably shorter male labial palpus than + +Cidariplura +( +Owada 1978 +) + +and they possess one signum in the corpus bursae, whereas there is no signum in all examined + +Cidariplura + +species. In + +Mosopia + +, + +Cidariplura + +and another genus + +Idia +, + +which has an unmodified male labial palpus and the male foretibia has a distinctively sharp spine distally ( +Owada 1994 +; + +Wu +et al +. 2013 + +), in addition, male genitalia of + +Mosopia + +and + +Cidariplura + +are similar as the three major parts of valva, i.e. costal process of valva, distal portion of valva and saccular process of valva, are well separated. + + + + +Description. +Head: Antenna in males—Ciliate with each flagellum bearing a pair of long bristles. Antenna in females—Ciliate. Labial palpus in males—length of 2 +nd +segment about 0.5 to 1. +5 x +that of 1st, length of 3 +rd +segment as long as or longer than that of 2 +nd +; a patch of long scales locating dorso-posteriorly on 2 +nd +segment; inner side of 3 +rd +segment covered by long scales with blunt apex; 1st segment extending upward beyond vertex, 2 +nd +segment bending backward till hind margin of mesothorax, and apex of 3rd segment touching front margin of abdomen at rest. Labial palpus in female—3 +rd +shorter than 2 +nd +, slender, tapering towards apex. Thorax: Legs in males—foretibial with presence of a spine at apex. Wings: Forewing broad, costa slightly excurved, apex nearly forming right angle, outer margin obtusely angulate at CuA1; R +3 +and R +4 +stalked, R +5 +arising from areole. Hindwing broad, R +s +and M +1 +short-stalked; M +2 +arising from rather near the anal angle of cell; M +3 +and CuA +1 +short-stalked. + +Male genitalia: Uncus slender with hooked apex; tegumen narrow, simple; vinculum well developed, U-shaped in ventral view with slender, long scale tufts arising from dorsal membranous portion, saccus usually V-shaped; valva sclerotized, distal projection usually tongue-like, tapering or truncate, sacculus developed, digitiform or rod-like; juxta broad, sclerotized, extending dorso-medially; transtillae sclerotized, rod-like, separated medially. Aedeagus moderate in length, broad, cylindrical, distal portion sclerotized as dentate patch; vesica weakly scobinate with numerous divercula. Female genitalia: Papillae anales truncate, apophyses posteriores and apophyses anteriores equal in length, ductus bursae shorter than or as long as corpus bursae, a pair of sclerotized bands locating laterally on ductus bursae; corpus bursae membranous, elongate, sac-like with dense internal spinose patch at basal half part. + + + +Distribution. +The eastern and southern Palaearctic to the Oriental region. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C54FFA0EEA6CE38FB0E8E60.xml b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C54FFA0EEA6CE38FB0E8E60.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..571a68c5457 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C54FFA0EEA6CE38FB0E8E60.xml @@ -0,0 +1,398 @@ + + + +Review of Cidariplura Butler, 1879 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Herminiinae). Part 1: the Cidariplura gladiata species complex + + + +Author + +Wu, Shipher + + + +Author + +Owada, Mamoru + + + +Author + +Wang, Min + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-09-12 + + +4668 + + +4 + + +489 +502 + + + +journal article +25468 +10.11646/zootaxa.4668.4.3 +4a792ded-d181-427a-9d49-e7ef16cc7a9a +1175-5326 +3449868 +C0D9D87E-71D6-49EE-99A6-749D694F5431 + + + + + + + +Cidariplura maraho +Wu & Owada, 2013 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 15, 16 +, +33 +, +42 +, +52 +) + + + + + + +Cidariplura maraho +Wu & Owada, in + + +Wu +et al +., 2013: 151 + + + +, figs 14–16, 41, 42, 62, 73, 82. + + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +, ♂, +Taiwan +, +Nantou County +, +Meifeng +, + +2,100 m + +, + +29. VI. 2012 + +, +TFRI147244 +S. Wu +& +W. C. Chang +leg. ( +TFRI +) ( +Fig. 15 +) + +. + +Paratypes +(9♂ +4♀ +): the same collecting locality as that of +holotype +, 1♂, + +18. VII. 1990 + +, +TFRI00010165 +, +Y. C. Chang +leg.; the + + +same locality, 3♂, + +20. VII. 2011 + +, +TFRI00128724 +♂, +S. Wu +& +W. C. Chang +leg. ( +TFRI +) + +; + +Hualien +, +Ci’en +, + +1,950 m + +, 2♂, + +28. VI. 2011 + +, +S. Wu +& +W. C. Chang +leg.; the + + +same locality, 1♂, + +18. VII. 2011 + +, +S. Wu +& +W. C. Chang +leg. ( +TFRI +) + +; + +Pilu-Shenmu +, + +2,000 m + +, +1♀ +, + +16.VII. 2012 + +, +M. Owada +& +L. C. Shih +leg. ( +ESRI +) + +; + +Nantou +, +Biluxi +, 1♂, + +12. VII. 2011 + +, +C. M. Fu +leg.; +Turnyuan +, +1♀ +, + +23. VI. 2007 + +, + +1,950 m + +, +C. M. Fu +leg. ( +NMNS +) + +; + +Taichung +, +Wuling +, + +1,850 m + +, +1♀ +, + +10–12. VIII. 1990 + +, +M. Owada +leg. ( +NSMT +) + +; + +Hualien +, +Tsu’en +, + +1,990 m + +, 1♂, + +26. VI. 1989 + +, +M. Owada +leg. ( +NSMT +) + +; + +Nantou +, +Hotso +[Lushan Spa], +1♀ +, + +26–29. VI. 1973 + +, +M. Owada +leg. ( +NSMT +) + +. + + +Additional material examined +(2♂ +2♀ +). + +Hualien +, +Tsu’en +, + +2,000 m + +, +1♀ +, + +13. VII. 2015 + +, +NSMT3284 + + +♀ +, +M. Owada +& +L. Shih +leg. ( +NSMT +) + +; + +Nantou +, +Sunlinksea +, + +1,700 m + +, 1♂, + +25. VI. 2017 + +, +NSMT3283 + +♂, +M. Owada +& +L. Shih +leg. ( +NSMT +); + +Kaohsiung +, Tianchi-2, + +2,280 m + +, 1♂ +1♀ +, + +6. VII. 2015 + +, +M. Owada +& +C.-M. Fu +leg. ( +NSMT +) + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +The species is easily distinguished from other species in + +C. gladiata + +complex due to the paler ground coloration of the wings and the more contrasting forewing medial region, the less curved transversal lines on both wings, and the medial part of the corpus bursae, which is incised with longitudinal wrinkles. + + + + +Distribution and phenology. +Endemic to +Taiwan +. The adults occur from June to August. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C56FFA0EEA6CA7BFC388A95.xml b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C56FFA0EEA6CA7BFC388A95.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8d9be7ea141 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C56FFA0EEA6CA7BFC388A95.xml @@ -0,0 +1,326 @@ + + + +Review of Cidariplura Butler, 1879 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Herminiinae). Part 1: the Cidariplura gladiata species complex + + + +Author + +Wu, Shipher + + + +Author + +Owada, Mamoru + + + +Author + +Wang, Min + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-09-12 + + +4668 + + +4 + + +489 +502 + + + +journal article +25468 +10.11646/zootaxa.4668.4.3 +4a792ded-d181-427a-9d49-e7ef16cc7a9a +1175-5326 +3449868 +C0D9D87E-71D6-49EE-99A6-749D694F5431 + + + + + + + +Cidariplura luding + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs 13, 14 +, +29 +, +41 +, +51 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +. ♂, +China +. +Sichuan +, +Luding +, +Gangdong-wenquan +, + +8. VII. 2016 + +, +NSMT3279 +♂, in +SCAU +( +Fig. 13 +) + +. + +Paratypes +(3♂ +4♀ +): The same collecting data as the +holotype +, 3♂ +3♀ +, +NSMT3287 +♂, +NSMT3320 +♂, +NSMT3327 +♂, +NSMT3280 +♀ +, +NSMT3321 +♀ +, +NSMT3328 +♀ +; +Shimian +, +Caoke +, + +1,700 m + +, +1♀ +, + +28. VII. 2017 + +, +NSMT3322 +♀ +, +M. Wang +et al +. leg. ( +SCAU +and +NSMT +); +Sichuan +, Jiajingshan, + +860 m + +, 2♂ +1♀ +, + +5. VII. 2017 + +, +S. Wu +leg. (temporally in +ASIZ +, will be transferred to +IZCAS +after article published) + + + + + +Diagnosis. +See diagnosis of + +Cidariplura nanling +. + + + + + +Description. +Measurements. Forewing length +19–21 mm +in males (n= 6); +17–18 mm +in females (n= 5). Eye round; antenna ciliate, male with a pair of long bristles on each segment, length of bristle +2 X +diameter of medial region of shaft. Head, all segments of thorax as well as femur, tibia and 1st tarsal segment chocolate brown. Labial palpus of males ( +Fig. 29 +) and females as for + +Cidariplura nanling + +. Legs: male foretibial with presence of a spine at the apex. Forewing broad, slightly excurved, apex slightly protruded; ground coloration chocolate brown; white antemedial and postmedial lines slender, the former oblique, wave-like, the latter excurved outward at discal cell part; discocellular spot white, narrowed; outer margin white; marginal scales chocolate brown. Hindwing chocolate brown; postmedial line white; outer margin white; marginal scales chocolate brown. Abdomen brown, 8th segment unmodified. Male genitalia ( +Fig. 41 +)—Uncus broad, stout, apex hook-like. Tegumen and vinculum long, equal in length; saccus V-shaped. Valva trifurcate, costal process heavily sclerotized, curved ventrally at halfway point, distal portion of valva tongue-like, saccular process narrow, stout, nearly 0. +5 X +shorter than distal portion of valva, covered with sparse hair tufts. Juxta plate-like, transtilla indistinct. Aedeagus stout, straight, nearly as long as valva; vesica densely scobinat, without cornutus. Female genitalia ( +Fig. 51 +)—Papillae anales membranous with short hair- like setae; both pairs of apophyses slender; ductus bursae nearly as long as corpus bursae, with a pair of broad lateral sclerites. Corpus bursae elliptical, nearly as long as ductus bursae, basal half part surrounded by dense internal spinose patch; ductus seminalis arising from lateral base of corpus bursae, broadened and coiled basally. + + + + +FIGURE 1–22. +Habitus of + +Cidariplura gladiata + +complex. +1. + +C. gladiata + +, male, NSMT3285, Honshu, Japan (NSMT); +2. +Ditto +, female, NSMT3286, Honshu, Japan (NSMT); +3. +Ditto +, male, NSMT3301, Iriomote Is., Japan (NSMT); +4. +Ditto +, female, NSMT3299, Ishigaki Is., Japan (NSMT); +5. +Ditto +, male, NSMT3289, Taiwan (NSMT); +6. +Ditto +, female, NSMT3290, Taiwan (NSMT); +7. +Ditto +, male, NSMT3295, Vietnam (NSMT); +8. +Ditto +, female, NSMT3296, Vietnam (NSMT); +9. +Ditto +, male, NSMT-MO169, Korea (NSMT); +10. +Ditto +, male, NSMT3294, Huangshan, Anhui (NSMT); +11. + +C. nanling + + +sp. nov. + +, male, holotype, NSMT3291, Nanling, Guangdong (SCAU); +12. +Ditto +, female, paratype, NSMT3292, Nanling, Guangdong (SCAU); +13. + +C. luding + + +sp. nov. + +, male, holotype, NSMT3279, Luding, Sichuan (SCAU); +14. +Ditto +, female, paratype, NSMT3280, Luding, Sichuan (SCAU); +15. + +C. maraho + +, male, holotype (TFRI); +16. +Ditto +, female, paratype, Taiwan (TFRI); +17. + +C. shanmeii + +, male, holotype, Taiwan (TFRI); +18. +Ditto +, female, paratype, Taiwan (TFRI); +19. + +C. hbun + + +sp. nov. + +, male, holotype, Taiwan (TFRI); +20. +Ditto +, female, paratype, Taiwan (TFRI); +21. +Ditto +, male, paratype, NSMT3303, Qiyunshan, Hunan (SCAU); +22. +Ditto +, female, paratype, NSMT3288, Jiulianshan, Guangdong (SCAU). Scale bar= 10 mm. Photos by Mamoru Owada (1 +– +14, 19, 21, 22), Shipher Wu (15–18, 20). + + + + +Distribution and phenology. +China +( +Sichuan +). The species is presumably univoltine and adults occur from June to July. + + + + +Etymology. +Named after the +type +locality, noun in apposition. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C57FFA2EEA6C9EFFC388EA9.xml b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C57FFA2EEA6C9EFFC388EA9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3fa27473414 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C57FFA2EEA6C9EFFC388EA9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ + + + +Review of Cidariplura Butler, 1879 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Herminiinae). Part 1: the Cidariplura gladiata species complex + + + +Author + +Wu, Shipher + + + +Author + +Owada, Mamoru + + + +Author + +Wang, Min + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-09-12 + + +4668 + + +4 + + +489 +502 + + + +journal article +25468 +10.11646/zootaxa.4668.4.3 +4a792ded-d181-427a-9d49-e7ef16cc7a9a +1175-5326 +3449868 +C0D9D87E-71D6-49EE-99A6-749D694F5431 + + + + + + + +Cidariplura nanling + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs 11, 12 +, +31 +, +40 +, +50 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +. ♂, +China +. +Guangdong +, +Shaoguan +, +Nanling +, 900– + +1,400 m + +, + +21–28. VI. 2008 + +, +NSMT3291 +♂, in +SCAU +( +Fig. 11 +) + +. + +Paratypes +( + + +13♂ +2 + + +♀): +The +same collecting data as the +holotype +, 6♂, +NSMT3323 + + +♂, +NSMT3324 + + +♂; the same locality, + +1,100 m + +, 1♂, + +10. VII. 2007 + +, +NSMT3326 + + +♂; the same locality, + +1,050 m + +, 1♂ +2♀ +, + +19. VII. 2014 + +, +NSMT3292 + + +♀ +, +NSMT3330 + + +♀ +; the same locality, + +1,000 m + +, + +2♂, 18 + +-22. VII. 2014 + +; + +Guangdong +, +Qinyuan +, +Longtanjao +, + +1,100 m + +, 1♂, + +10. VII. 2007 + +, +NSMT3329 + + +♂; +Yunnan +, +Kunming +, +Qinglongxia +, + +1,800 m + +, 2♂, + +26. VII. 2016 + +, +NSMT3293 + + +♂, +NSMT3318 + + +♂, M. +Wang +et al +. leg. ( +SCAU +and +NSMT +) + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +The separation of this species and + +C. gladiata + +has been given in the diagnosis of the previous species. + +Cidariplura nanling + +can be distinguished from the allopatric + +C. luding + + +sp. nov. + +by the nearly rounded forewing discocellular spot, rather than the narrowed spot observed in + +C. luding + +; the subcostal region of the forewing postmedial line is incurved rather than slightly excurved; the subtornal region of the hindwing postmedial line is incurved rather than straight; the distal portion of the valva is more rounded rather than tapering; the costal process of the valva is less curved towards ventral part; the scale tufts on the dorsal surface of the saccular process are less developed. The female genitalia have no remarkable difference between these two species. + + + + +Description. +Measurements. Forewing length +17–20 mm +in males (n= 14); +16–17 mm +in females (n= 2). Eye round; antenna ciliate, male with a pair of long bristles on each segment, length of bristle +2 X +diameter of medial region of shaft. Head, all segments of thorax, as well as femur, tibia and 1 +st +tarsal segment chocolate brown. Male labial palpus ( +Fig. 31 +) modified as follows: 1st segment very long, upcurved along frons, surpassing vertex, smoothly covered with scales; 2 +nd +segment bent at right angle to 1 +st +, slender, slightly curved, nearly as long as 1st, reaching the anterior part of thorax, internally with ochreous scales which are elongated and enlarged at their apices; 3 +rd +segment long and stout, nearly 1. +4 X +longer than 2 +nd +, basal part of labial palpus wider than medial part, internally with long ochreous scales which are slender and almost twice as long as those on 2 +nd +. Labial palpus in female: 3 +rd +shorter than 2 +nd +, slender, tapering towards apex. Legs normal, male foretibia with apical spine. Forewing broad, slightly excurved, apex slightly protruded; ground coloration chocolate brown; white antemedial and postmedial lines slender, the former oblique, wave-like, the latter excurved outward at discal cell part; discocellular spot white, nearly rounded; outer margin white; marginal scales chocolate brown. Hindwing chocolate brown; postmedial line white; outer margin white; marginal scales chocolate brown. Abdomen brown, 8th segment unmodified. Male genitalia ( +Fig. 40 +)—Uncus broad, stout, apex hook-like. Tegumen and vinculum long, equal in length; saccus Vshaped. Valva trifurcate, costal process heavily sclerotized, curved ventrally at halfway point, distal portion of valva tongue-like, saccular process narrow, stout, nearly 0. +5 X +shorter than distal portion of valva, covered with sparse hair tufts. Juxta plate-like, transtilla indistinct. Aedeagus stout, straight, nearly as long as valva; vesica densely scobinate, without cornutus. Female genitalia ( +Fig. 50 +)—Papillae anales membranous with short hair-like setae; both pairs of apophyses slender; ductus bursae with a pair of broad lateral sclerites. Corpus bursae elliptical, ca. 1. +33 X +longer than ductus bursae, basal half surrounded by dense internal spinose patch; ductus seminalis arising from lateral base of corpus bursae, broadened and coiled at basal portion. + + + + +Distribution and phenology. +China +( +Guangdong +, +Yunnan +). The species is presumably univoltine and adults occur from June to July. + + + + +Etymology. +Named after the +type +locality, noun in apposition. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C58FFACEEA6CFECFEAF8CB0.xml b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C58FFACEEA6CFECFEAF8CB0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cf41c00113e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C58FFACEEA6CFECFEAF8CB0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,438 @@ + + + +Review of Cidariplura Butler, 1879 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Herminiinae). Part 1: the Cidariplura gladiata species complex + + + +Author + +Wu, Shipher + + + +Author + +Owada, Mamoru + + + +Author + +Wang, Min + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-09-12 + + +4668 + + +4 + + +489 +502 + + + +journal article +25468 +10.11646/zootaxa.4668.4.3 +4a792ded-d181-427a-9d49-e7ef16cc7a9a +1175-5326 +3449868 +C0D9D87E-71D6-49EE-99A6-749D694F5431 + + + + + + + +Cidariplura hbun + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs 19–22 +, +30, 32 +, +44, 45 +, +54, 55 +) + + + + + + +Cidariplura shanmeii +: + + +Wu +et al +., 2013: 148 + + + +, figs 37, 38, 64, 69, 80, part, +nec +Wu & Owada, 2013 +. + + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +, +♂ +, +Ilan +, +Fushan Botanical Garden +, + +700 m + +, + +12. V. 2019 + +, +NSMT3473 +♂, +M. Owada & S. Wu +leg. ( +TFRI +) ( +Fig. 19 +) + +. + +Paratypes +( +7♂ +6♀ +): +Taiwan +. +Nantou Co. +, +Lianhuachi +, + +600 m + +, +1♂ +, + +12. VII. 2010 + +, slide + +TFRI +160285 + +, +C. C. Kuo + +; + +the same collecting locality, +1♂ +, + +10. VIII. 2010 + +, +TFRI153115 +, +C. C. Kuo +leg. + +; + +the same locality, +1♀ +, + +7. X. 2010 + +, + +TFRI +160565 + +, +C. C. Kuo +( +TFRI +) + +; + +Lienhuachih +[= +Lianhuachi +], + +700 m + +, +1♀ +, + +17–18. VII. 2012 + +, +NSMT3282 +♀, +M. Owada & L. Shih +leg. ( +NSMT +) (the above +paratypes +of + +C. hbun + +were designated as +paratypes +of + + +C. shanmeii +in +Wu + +et al +., 2013 + +) + +; + +Ilan +, +Fushan Botanical Garden +, + +700 m + +, +2♂ +, + +12. V. 2019 + +, +M. Owada & S. Wu +leg. ( +NSMT +) + +; + +Taitung +, Guanfu, +1♂ +, + +6. XII. 2010 + +, slide +TFRI129041 +, Y. C. Lin leg. ( +TFRI +) + +. + +China +. +Hunan +, +Chenzhou +, +Guidong +, +Qiyunshan +, +1♂ +, + +1,100 m + +, + +9. IX. 2018 + +, +NSMT3303 +♂ ( +SCAU +) + +; + +Guangdong +, +Heyuan +, +Liangping +, +Tianyuan +, +Jiulianshan +, + +200 m + +, +1♂ +3♀ +, + +18–19. V. 2018 + +, +NSMT3288 +♀, +NSMT3304 +♀, +NSMT3331 +♂, +NSMT3332 +♀, +Shaoguan +, +Xinfeng +, +Jiulianshan +, + +250 m + +, +1♀ +, + +20. V. 2018 + +, +M. Wang +et al +. leg. ( +SCAU +and +NSMT +). + + + + + +Diagnosis. +See diagnosis of + +Cidariplura shanmeii +. + + + + + +Description. +Measurements. Forewing length +12–16 mm +in males (n= 7); +12–14 mm +in females (n= 8). Eye large; antenna ciliate, male with a pair of long bristles on each segment, length of bristle +2 X +diameter of shaft in median region. Head, all segments of thorax as well as femur, tibia and 1st tarsal segment chocolate brown. Male labial palpus ( +Fig. 30 +) specialized as follows: 1st segment very long, upcurved along frons, surpassing vertex, smoothly covered with ordinary scales; 2 +nd +segment bent at right angle to 1 +st +segment, slender, slightly curved, 0. +5 X +shorter than 1 +st +, reaching the anterior part of thorax, internally with specialized ochreous scales which are elongated and enlarged at their apices; 3 +rd +long and stout, +3 X +to 3. +5 X +longer than 2 +nd +, basal part of labial palpus wider than medial part, internally with long blackish scales which are slender and almost twice as long as those on 2 +nd +. Labial palpus in female: 3 +rd +shorter than 2 +nd +, slender, tapering towards apex. Legs: male foretibia with apical spine. Forewing broad, slightly excurved, apex near right-angled; ground coloration chocolate brown; antemedial and postmedial line slender, light ochreous, the former oblique, wave-like, the latter smoothly excurved outward at discal cell part; orbicular and reniform stigmata white, the former small, the latter moderate size, lunate-shaped; submarginal line slender, ochreous, wave-like; outer margin ochreous; marginal scales chocolate brown. Hindwing chocolate brown; medial line ochreous with one ochreous spot situated at outside of tornal area; outer margin ochreous; marginal scales chocolate brown. Abdomen brown, 8th segment unmodified. + + +Male genitalia ( +Figs 44, 45 +)—Uncus broad, stout, apex hook-like. Tegumen and vinculum long, equal in length; saccus V-shaped, medial part elongated anteriorly. Valva distinctively trifurcate, costal process heavily sclerotized, apex curved ventrally, distal portion of valva broad, sclerotized, saccular process narrow, elongated, covered with hair tufts. Juxta plate-like, transtilla indistinct. Aedeagus stout, straight, 1. +25 X +longer than valva; vesical densely scobinate without cornutus. + + +Female genitalia ( +Figs 54, 55 +)—Papillae anales membranous with short hair-like setae; both pairs of apophyses slender; ductus bursae long, with pair of broad lateral sclerites flattened basally. Corpus bursae elliptical, ca. 1. +33 X +longer than ductus bursae, basal half part surrounding with dense internal spinous patch; ductus seminalis arising from lateral base of corpus bursae, broadened and coiled basally. + + + + +Distribution and phenology. +Taiwan +and +China +. This species occurs sympatrically and synchronously with + +C. shanmeii + +in Northern and Central +Taiwan +. The first generation on the wing in spring to summer is generally larger than the second generation in autumn. + + + + +Etymology. +Named after the old regional name in Atayal language, Hbun, of the +type +locality, Fushan, noun in apposition. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C5BFFAEEEA6CFECFA3F8B71.xml b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C5BFFAEEEA6CFECFA3F8B71.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e1273ae9112 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/51/B7/3751B7211C5BFFAEEEA6CFECFA3F8B71.xml @@ -0,0 +1,559 @@ + + + +Review of Cidariplura Butler, 1879 (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Herminiinae). Part 1: the Cidariplura gladiata species complex + + + +Author + +Wu, Shipher + + + +Author + +Owada, Mamoru + + + +Author + +Wang, Min + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2019 + +2019-09-12 + + +4668 + + +4 + + +489 +502 + + + +journal article +25468 +10.11646/zootaxa.4668.4.3 +4a792ded-d181-427a-9d49-e7ef16cc7a9a +1175-5326 +3449868 +C0D9D87E-71D6-49EE-99A6-749D694F5431 + + + + + + + +Cidariplura shanmeii +Wu & Owada, 2013 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 17, 18 +, +28 +, +43 +, +53 +) + + + + + + +Cidariplura gladiata + +ab. +ochreimacula + +Strand, 1919: 149 + +, aberration, unavailable infrasubspecific name. + + + + + +Cidariplura gladiata +: + +Wang, 1994: 397 + + +; + +Wang, 2001: 12 + +, +nec +Butler, 1879 +. + + + + + +Cidariplura shanmeii +Wu & Owada, in + + +Wu +et al +., 2013: 148 + + + +, figs 3, 4, 7, 8, part. + + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +, ♂, +Taiwan +, +Chiayi +Co., +Shanmei +, + +800 m + +, + +8. VII. 2011 + +, +TFRI128721 +, +S. Wu +& +W. C. Chang +leg. ( +TFRI +) ( +Fig. 17 +) + +. + +Paratypes +(8♂ +5♀ +): +Taiwan +, the same collecting locality as that of the +holotype +, 1♂, + +5. VIII. 2011 + +, +W. C. Chang +& +S. Wu +leg.; the + + +same locality, + +1♂ +, +2. XI. 2011 + +, +W. C. Chang +& +S. Wu +leg. + +; + +Nantou +, +Lianhuachi +, + +600 m + +, 1♂, + +21. V. 2009 + +, +C. C. Kuo +leg.; the + + +same locality, 1♂, + +10. V. 2010 + +, +TFRI151527 + +, C. C. Kuo leg.; the + +same locality, 3♂, + +23. VII. 2009 + +, +C. C. Kuo +leg.; the + + +same locality, 1♂, + +12. VII. 2010 + +, +C. C. Kuo +leg.; 1♂, + +10. VIII. 2010 + +, +C. C. Kuo +leg. + +; + +Pingtung +, +Shouka +, +1♀ +, + +450 m + +, + +27. X. 2011 + +, +Y. C. Lin +leg.; the + + +same locality, +2♀ +, + +22. III. 2012 + +, +Y. C. Lin +leg.; the + + +same locality, 1♂, + +19. VII. 2012 + +, +Y. C. Lin +leg.; the + + +same locality, +2♀ +, + +15. VIII. 2012 + +, +Y. C. Lin +leg. + +; + +Hualien +, +Guanfu +, 1 + +♂, 180 m + +, + +9. VIII. 2010 + +, leg. +Y. C. Lin +leg.; the + + +same locality, 1♂, + +13. IX. 2010 + +, +Y. C. Lin +leg. ( +TFRI +) + +. + + +Additional material examined. + +Taiwan +. +Ilan +, +Fushan Botanical Garden +, + +700 m + +, + +1♂, 12 +, +15–16. VI. 2015 + +, +NSMT3305 +♂, +M. Owada +& +S. Wu +leg. + +; + +the same locality, 2♂ +1♀ +, + +12. V. 2019 + +, +NSMT3474 +♂, +NSMT3475 +♀ +, +M. Owada +& +S. Wu +leg. ( +NSMT +) + +; + +Nantou +, +Lienhuachih +[=Lianhuachi], + +700 m + +, 2♂, + +17–18. VII. 2012 + +, +NSMT3297 +♂ ( +NSMT +), +NSMT3300 +♂ ( +ESRI +), +M. Owada +& +L. Shih +leg. + +, + +Huisun Linchang +, + +770 m + +, 2♂, + +21–22. VI. 2017 + +, +NSMT3306 +♂ ( +NSMT +), +NSMT3307 +♂ ( +ESRI +), +M. Owada +& +L. Shih +leg. + +, + +Aowanda +, + +1,000 m + +, 1♂, + +9. V. 2013 + +, +NSMT3281 +♂ ( +NSMT +), +M. Owada +, +L. Shih +& +Y. Chen +leg. + + + +Notes. + +Wu +et al +. (2013) + +described + +C. shanmeii + +with the illustration of the +holotype +of + +C. shanmeii + +, however the illustrated structures in + +Wu +et al +. (2013 + +: figs 37, 38, male; 64, female; 69, labial palpus; 80, male foreleg), actually belong to the new species, + +C. hbun + + +sp. nov. + +, described below. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Externally + +C. shanmeii + +and + +C. hbun + +are difficult to be separated, but the former species can be distinguished from the latter by the narrowed white forewing discocellular spot, rather than a wider and more yellowish-white spot; the costal process of the valva is digitiform rather than stouter and curved downwards; the distinctively shorter distal portion of valva rather than nearly equal in length as costal process; the digitiform, straight costal process rather than curved ventrally and tapering; the saccular process is extremely small and curved rather than robust and rod-like pointing parallelly with distal portion of valva; the ductus bursae is extremely narrowed compared to the moderate width of other species in the complex. + + +Re-description. +Due to the existence of specimens belonging to both + +C. shanmeii + +and + +C. hbun + + +sp. nov. + +in the +paratype +series of + +C. shanmeii + +( +sensu +Wu & Owada, in + +Wu +et al +., 2013 + +), we re-describe + +C. shanmeii + +herein to clarify the identity of that species. Measurements. Forewing length +12–14 mm +in males (n= 17); +12–14 mm +in females (n= 5). Eye round; antenna ciliate, male with a pair of long bristles on each segment, length of bristle +2 X +diameter of shaft in median region. Head, all segments of thorax as well as femur, tibia and 1st tarsal segment chocolate brown. Male labial palpus ( +Fig. 28 +) modified as follows: 1st segment very long, upcurved along frons, surpassing vertex, smoothly covered with ordinary scales; 2nd segment bent at a right angle from the 1st, slender, slightly curved, 0. +5 X +shorter than 1st, reaching the anterior part of thorax, internally with specialized ochreous scales which are elongated and enlarged at their apices; 3rd segment long, +3 X +longer than 2nd, basal part of labial palpus as wide as medial part, internally with long ochreous scales slender and almost twice as long as those in the 2 +nd +segment. Labial palpus in female: 3 +rd +shorter than 2 +nd +, slender, tapering towards apex. Legs: male foretibia with apical spine. Forewing broad, slightly excurved, apex nearly forming right angle; ground coloration chocolate brown; antemedial and postmedial line slender, light ochreous, the former oblique, wave-like, the latter smoothly excurved outward at discal cell part; discocellular spot white, slender and lunate-shaped; submarginal line slender, ochreous, wave-like; outer margin ochreous; marginal scales chocolate brown. Hindwing chocolate brown; medial line ochreous with one ochreous spot situating at outside of tornal area; outer margin ochreous; marginal scales chocolate brown. Abdomen brown, 8th segment unmodified. Male genitalia ( +Fig. 43 +)—Uncus broad, stout, apex hook-like. Tegumen and vinculum long, equal in length; saccus V-shaped, medial part elongated anteriorly. Valva trifurcate, costal process, straight and digitiform, distal portion of valva broad, saccular process short, curved and digitiform. Juxta plate-like, transtilla indistinct. Aedeagus stout, straight, 1. +25 X +longer than valva; vesica densly scobinate without cornutus. Female genitalia ( +Fig. 53 +)—Papillae anales membranous with short hair-like setae; both pairs of apophyses slender, moderate length; ductus bursae as long as corpus bursae, with a pair of slender lateral sclerites. Corpus bursae elliptical, basal half part surrounded by dense internal spinose patch; ductus seminalis arising from lateral base of corpus bursae, broadened and coiled basally. + + + + +Distribution and phenology. +Endemic to +Taiwan +. The adults occasionally occur from March to November. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/52/C8/3752C86688B8B50D4AE268E311EC007E.xml b/data/37/52/C8/3752C86688B8B50D4AE268E311EC007E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e53edfb9dac --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/52/C8/3752C86688B8B50D4AE268E311EC007E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part H) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +557 +585 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Hesperis matronalis +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 663. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Italia." RCN: 4829. + + + + +Lectotype +(Ball in Jarvis & al., +Regnum Veg. +127: 54. 1993): Herb. Clifford: 335, + +Hesperis + +2 (BM-000646321) + +. + + + + +Generitype +of + +Hesperis +Linnaeus + +(vide Green, +Prop. Brit. Bot. +: 171. 1929). + + + + +Current name: + +Hesperis matronalis +L. subsp. +matronalis + +( +Brassicaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/52/CC/3752CCD9301E5048BAEFBB56E03B4F43.xml b/data/37/52/CC/3752CCD9301E5048BAEFBB56E03B4F43.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d846b9358b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/52/CC/3752CCD9301E5048BAEFBB56E03B4F43.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Diversity pattern of insects from Macao based on an updated species checklist after 25 years + + + +Author + +Xian, Chunlan +School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China + + + +Author + +Leong, Chi Man +Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Beijing normal university - Hong Kong Baptist University United International College, Zhuhai, China & Macao Entomological Society, Estrada Coronel Nicolau de Mesquita, Macao SAR, China + + + +Author + +Luo, Jiuyang +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2748-9534 +School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China + + + +Author + +Jia, Fenglong +School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China + + + +Author + +Han, Hongxiang +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China +hanhx@ioz.ac.cn + + + +Author + +Xie, Qiang +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6376-8808 +School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China +xieq8@mail.sysu.edu.cn + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2024 + +2024-04-05 + + +12 + + +118110 +118110 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e118110 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e118110 +1314-2828-12-e118110 +57B0CE31B4055266A115FC1275D70C79 + + + + +Eudocima homaena (Hubner, [1823]) + + + +Notes + +Li (2023) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/53/3C/37533C6ED3FB52309EA85CA7EB1C9FBB.xml b/data/37/53/3C/37533C6ED3FB52309EA85CA7EB1C9FBB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..639b9278b29 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/53/3C/37533C6ED3FB52309EA85CA7EB1C9FBB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,220 @@ + + + +On four new species of the orb-weaver spider genus Araneus Clerck, 1757 (Araneae, Araneidae) from southern China + + + +Author + +Wu, Yibei +College of Agriculture and Forestry Engineering and Planning, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization in the Fanjing Mountain Region, Tongren University, Tongren 554300, Guizhou, China + + + +Author + +Wang, Cheng +College of Agriculture and Forestry Engineering and Planning, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization in the Fanjing Mountain Region, Tongren University, Tongren 554300, Guizhou, China + + + +Author + +Wu, Nanfei +Central South Inventory and Planning Institute of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Changsha, Hunan 410014, China + + + +Author + +Zhang, Mengfei +Central South Inventory and Planning Institute of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Changsha, Hunan 410014, China + + + +Author + +Mi, Xiaoqi +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1744-3855 +College of Agriculture and Forestry Engineering and Planning, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization in the Fanjing Mountain Region, Tongren University, Tongren 554300, Guizhou, China +mixiaoqi1018@163.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2023 + +2023-05-09 + + +1160 + + +169 +190 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1160.101594 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1160.101594 +1313-2970-1160-169 +25047ED149154DC4AF723FD0BA7CDB5D +3276E011253459658F9D1F6E809BF3C5 + + + + + +Aoaraneus octumaculalus (Han & Zhu, 2010) +comb. nov. + + + + +Fig. 10 + + + + +Araneus octumaculalus +Han & Zhu, 2010: 58, figs 1-6. (Type material not examined.) + + + +Material examined. + + +1♀ +(TRU- +Araneidae +-174), +China +: +Hainan Province +, +Ledong Li Autonomous County +, +Jianfeng Township +, +Jianfengling National Nature Reserve +, around +Tianchi +pond ( +18°44.45'N +, +108°51.49'E +, ca + +860 m + +), +11.IV.2019 +, +C. Wang +& +Y.F. Yang +leg. + +; + +1♀ +(TRU- +Araneidae +-175), same locality and collectors ( +18°45.24'N +, +108°51.57'E +, ca + +850 m + +), +14.IV.2019 + +; + +1♀ +(TRU- +Araneidae +-176), +Jianfengling National Nature Reserve +, around the peak of +Jianfengling +( +18°43.11'N +, +108°52.32'E +, ca + +1400 m + +), +16.IV.2019 + +, same collectors; + +1♂ +(TRU- +Araneidae +-177), +Hainan Province +, +Wuzhishan City +, +Shuiman Township +, around +Yatai Rainforest Hotel +( +18°54.37'N +, +109°40.70'E +, ca + +750 m + +), +11.VIII.2020 + +, X.Q. Mi et al. leg. + + + +Figure 10. +Distribution map of the species. + + + + +Description. + +See +Han and Zhu (2010) +. + + + +Comments. + +The type locality of + +A. octumaculalus + +is in Changjiang County, Hainan Province. The type specimens were not examined because this species was well described and illustrated ( +Han and Zhu 2010 +), and both male and female specimens of this species from nearby localities in Hainan were examined. The new combination is based on the following characters of + +Aoaraneus + +: long, wrinkled and flexible scape with bent tip; long terminal and subterminal apophyses, median apophysis with apical and basal projections; male endite with lateral tooth, male coxa I with ventral hook, and male femur II with groove. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/53/49/375349AC1019C707B48E757D0D954FE3.xml b/data/37/53/49/375349AC1019C707B48E757D0D954FE3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..027dd33b3e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/53/49/375349AC1019C707B48E757D0D954FE3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@ + + + +Recent noteworthy findings of fungus gnats from Finland and northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae) + + + +Author + +Jakovlev, Jevgeni + + + +Author + +Salmela, Jukka + + + +Author + +Polevoi, Alexei + + + +Author + +Penttinen, Jouni + + + +Author + +Vartija, Noora-Annukka + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1068 +1068 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068 +1314-2828-2-1068 + + + + +Coelosia gracilis Johannsen, 1912*** + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +DIPT-JS-2014-0057 +; recordedBy: + +J. Salmela; T. +Hietajaervi + +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: Regio kuusamoensis; verbatimLocality: Salla, Kuntasjoki, +Vaerrioe +Strict Nature Reserve; verbatimElevation: 320 m; decimalLatitude: +67.749 +; decimalLongitude: +29.617 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: J. Salmela; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise trap +; verbatimEventDate: +2013-7-29/9-19 +; habitat: headwater stream, old-growth boreal forest; Record Level: institutionCode: +JES + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +MYCE-JS-2013-0007 +; recordedBy: +J. Salmela +; individualCount: +5 +; sex: +male +; otherCatalogNumbers: MYCE-JS-2013-0059; Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: Lapponia kemensis pars orientalis; verbatimLocality: Savukoski, Joutenoja; decimalLatitude: +67.821 +; decimalLongitude: +29.440 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: J. Salmela; A. Polevoi; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise trap +; eventDate: +2012-8-16/9-18 +; habitat: headwater stream, seminatural boreal forest; Record Level: institutionCode: +JES + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +J. Salmela +; individualCount: +4 +; sex: +male +; otherCatalogNumbers: MYCE-JS-2013-0059; Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: Lapponia kemensis pars orientalis; verbatimLocality: Savukoski, +Toermaeoja +; decimalLatitude: +67.846 +; decimalLongitude: +29.471 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: J. Salmela; A. Polevoi; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise trap +; eventDate: +2012-8-16/9-18 +; habitat: headwater stream, old-growth boreal forest; Record Level: institutionCode: +JES + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +J. Jakovlev; J. Penttinen +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: Lapponia enontekiensis; verbatimLocality: +Enontekioe +, +Kilpisjaervi +, Saana; decimalLatitude: +69.044 +; decimalLongitude: +20.816 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: J. Jakovlev; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise trap +; eventDate: +2006-6-19/7-14 +; habitat: mountain birch forest, herb rich vegetation; Record Level: institutionCode: +JJH + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +MYCE-NV-2013-0189 +; recordedBy: +J. Salmela +; individualCount: +8 +; sex: +male +; Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: Lapponia kemensis pars occidentalis; verbatimLocality: +Kittilae +, Vielmakoskenpalo NW; decimalLatitude: +68.009 +; decimalLongitude: +25.044 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: N. Vartija; J. Salmela; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise trap +; eventDate: +2007-8-2/31 +; habitat: rich spruce mire; Record Level: institutionCode: +JES + + + + +Distribution + +Holarctic. +Coelosia gracilis +(Fig. 17) is here reported for the first time from the Palaearctic region. The species was described from the USA, California and Colorado ( +Johannsen 1911 +) and according to +Soli +( + +Soli +1997 + +) the species has a wide range in the western part of the Nearctic region. + + + +Ecology +Finnish sampling sites are headwater streams surrounded by boreal forests, a mountain birch forest and a rich spruce mire. Immature stages are unknown. + + +Taxon discussion + +Coelosia gracilis +is very close to the European species +Coelosia truncata +Lundstroem +, 1909, and perhaps overlooked in the Palaearctic region. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/54/43/37544382BBBEA6B83A9C5656F8864FDE.xml b/data/37/54/43/37544382BBBEA6B83A9C5656F8864FDE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a809d05f650 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/54/43/37544382BBBEA6B83A9C5656F8864FDE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Pulmonaria sibirica +, +spec. nov. + + + +4. Pulmonaria calycibus abbreviatis, foliis radicalibus subcordatis. + + + +Habitat in +Sibiria +. ♃ + + + + +Radix +perennis. +Folia +glabra, glauca: radicalia cordata; caulina ovata. +Corymbi +ramosi, nutantes. +Media +inter antecedentem & sequentem. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/54/87/375487C2FFA3FFA3FEAFFD49FB3738B3.xml b/data/37/54/87/375487C2FFA3FFA3FEAFFD49FB3738B3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..76ad4658ecd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/54/87/375487C2FFA3FFA3FEAFFD49FB3738B3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ + + + +Description of two species of Protella Dana, 1852 (Crustacea: Amphipoda): P. gracilis Dana, 1853, from Balabac Strait, the Philippines, and P. amamiensis, new species, from southern Japan + + + +Author + +Takeuchi, Ichiro + + + +Author + +Lim, Jacqueline Hui Chern + + + +Author + +Inoue, Yuki + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2014 + +2014-02-28 + + +62 + + +53 +65 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.4504140 +2345-7600 +4504140 +49925D49-4E53-42C2-92E5-0BCDF457E3D4 + + + + + + +Genus + +Protella +Dana, 1852 + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Head fused (suture present) with pereonite 1. Antenna 1 well developed; flagellum with more than 2 articles. Antenna 2 well developed; flagellum with 2 articles. Mandible well developed; molar present, well developed; palp 3-articulate, setal formula 1-x-y-1. Maxilliped well developed; inner plate (basal endite) smaller than outer plate (ischial endite); outer plate (ischial endite) well developed; palp article 3 without distal projection; palp article 4 well developed. Pereonite 4 clavate appendage absent. Pereonites 6 and 7 separated (dorsal suture oblique). Pereopod 3 vestigial, with 1–2 articles. Pereopod 4 vestigial, with 1–2 articles. Pereopod 5 well developed, with 7 articles, with sparse, short setae and well-developed dactylus. Pereopods 6 and 7 well developed, with 7 articles. Gills on pereonites 3 and 4. Pleopods absent. Uropods 2 pairs; Uropod 1 uniarticulate, uniramous, with knob-liked appendage. Uropod 2 uniramous, vestigial (unclear). +Telson +(dorsal lobe) present. + + + + +Remarks. +Although the authors managed to clarify most of the generic diagnosis for + +Protella +Dana, 1852 + +, its mouthparts morphology are still unclear because the larger specimen among the +types +was lacking its head to pereonite 2 and the origin of the smaller specimen is questionable (see Remarks of + +Protella gracilis +Dana, 1853 + +). The state of its missing pereonites and consequently missing mouthparts such as maxilliped and mandibles, usually used for generic diagnosis, cannot be determined, and that is an issue because the genus + +Protella +Dana, 1852 + +, is one of the oldest genera in the Caprellidea, with several genera derived from this genus, i.e., + +Paraprotella +Mayer, 1903 + +, + +Protellopsis +Stebbing, 1888 + +, + +Metaprotella +Mayer, 1890 + +, and + +Orthoprotella +Mayer, 1903 + +. The diagnosis of antennae 1 and 2 and mouthparts are tentatively inferred from the descriptions of + +Protella amamiensis + +, +new species +. Thus, it is imperative that revision of the generic diagnosis for + +Protella + +and other related genera is conducted in the near future based on a complete specimen of + +P. gracilis + +[sensu stricto] collected from the +type +locality or adjacent areas by providing detailed descriptions and illustrations. + + +With respect to the generic diagnosis, it was recently determined that the fusion or distinct segmentation of pereonites 6 and 7 is an important aspect of the +Caprellidae +(see +Lim & Takeuchi, 2012 +). However, it has been widely described in many taxonomical papers of the +Caprellidae +as either “Pereonites 6 and 7 separated” like in most of the genera of the +Caprellidae +including + +Caprella + +(see +Takeuchi, 1993 +; +Krapp-Schickel & Takeuchi, 2005 +) or “Pereonites 6 and 7 completely fused (dorsal suture absent)” in the genus + +Metaprotella + +( +Takeuchi & Lowry, 2007a +; +Lim & Takeuchi, 2012 +). Unlike the original figure of + +P. gracilis + +[sensu stricto] from +Dana (1855) +, which showed pereonites 6 and 7 of + +P. gracilis + +clearly separated (as seen from pereonites 2–6), this study revealed that + +P. gracilis + +[sensu stricto] retained an intermediate trait between the two characteristics. Therefore, the generic diagnosis for + +Protella +Dana, 1852 + +, concerning fusion of pereonites 6 and 7 is revised to “Pereonites 6 and 7 separated (dorsal suture oblique).” + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/54/87/375487C2FFA3FFA7FC76FD2AFD293813.xml b/data/37/54/87/375487C2FFA3FFA7FC76FD2AFD293813.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c20763262f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/54/87/375487C2FFA3FFA7FC76FD2AFD293813.xml @@ -0,0 +1,476 @@ + + + +Description of two species of Protella Dana, 1852 (Crustacea: Amphipoda): P. gracilis Dana, 1853, from Balabac Strait, the Philippines, and P. amamiensis, new species, from southern Japan + + + +Author + +Takeuchi, Ichiro + + + +Author + +Lim, Jacqueline Hui Chern + + + +Author + +Inoue, Yuki + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2014 + +2014-02-28 + + +62 + + +53 +65 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.4504140 +2345-7600 +4504140 +49925D49-4E53-42C2-92E5-0BCDF457E3D4 + + + + + + + +Protella gracilis +Dana, 1853 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 1 +, +2 +) + + + + + + + +Protella gracilis +Dana, 1853: 812–813 + +, + +1855: 16 + + +, pl. 54 fig. 2a–f; + +Bate, 1862: 352 + +, pl. 55 fig. 5; + +McCain & Steinberg, 1970: 69–70 + +(in part). + + + + + +Material examined. +Types +, +1 male +(pereonites 3–7) and + +1 immature +female, +MCZ 1536 +, from +U.S. +Explor. Expedition + +. + + + + +Type +locality. + +Balabac Strait +, the +Philippines + +, 56.7 meters and +Singapore +? + + + + +Description. +Male, MCZ 1536. Body length,> +11.17 mm +. Head, pereonite 1 and pereonite 2 detached/missing. Pereonite 3, +3.27 mm +, dorsally smooth. Pereonite 4, +3.27 mm +, equal length with pereonite 3 with one rounded anterodistal projection and one rounded dorsodistal projection. Pereonites 5–7 dorsally and laterally smooth. Pereonite 5, +3.17 mm +. Pereonite 6 shortest, +0.63 mm +. Pereonite 7, +0.83 mm +. + + +Pereon. +Gnathopods 1–2 +missing. +Pereopod 3 +, 0.15× pereonite 3, uniarticulate with 4 marginal setae and 1 long facial seta near distal margin, apically with 3 setae. +Pereopod 4 +shorter than pereopod 3 (0.7× shorter), 0.1× pereonite 4, uniarticulate with 3 marginal setae and 1 long facial seta at distal margin, apically with 3 setae. Pereopods 5–7 well developed, becoming more robust progressively. +Pereopod 5 +basis subequal with ischium and merus combined, with short distal setae on inner and outer corner; ischium with setae on anterodistal corner; merus slightly expanded at posterodistal corner with tuft of setae; carpus longest, 1.7× merus with row of setae on entire inner margin, distally with one small rounded projection, posterodistally with tuft of setae; propodus subequal in length with basis, with a pair of proximal grasping spines, followed by fine marginal setae on palm and outer margin, distally with group of longer setae; dactylus well developed, falcate, length subequal with merus. +Pereopod 6 +basis with scarce marginal setae, distally with setae on inner and outer corner; ischium with setae on both distal corners; merus expanded at posterodistal corner, with tuft of setae and few fine setae on inner margin; carpus 1.4× longer than merus, inner margin with row of marginal setae, distally with one small projection, posterodistally with tuft of setae; propodus 1.3× carpus, with a pair of grasping spines near proximal end of palm, palm with fine setae, outer margin with fine setae, becoming more dense and long moving towards distal margin of propodus; dactylus falcate. +Pereopod 7 +basis subequal in length with basis of pereopod 5, with short distal setae on inner and outer corner; ischium with setae on inner and outer distal corner; merus expanded at posterodistal corner with tuft of setae; carpus 1.3× merus, inner margin with row of marginal setae, distally with one small triangular projection, posterodistally with tuft of setae; propodus with a pair of grasping spines at proximal end of palm, inner and outer margin of propodus with marginal setae, distally with longer setae; dactylus well developed, falcate, subequal in length to dactylus of pereopod 5. + + + +Fig. 1. + +Protella gracilis +Dana, 1853 + +, type, male,>8.85 mm, MCZ 1536, Balabac Strait, the Philippines. + + + +Pleon. +Penes +large, bilobate, positioned medially. Tuft of 4 setae present between penes and uropod 1. +Uropod 1 +subconical; peduncle with a group of ca. 8 long setae, ramus triangular, subequal in length with peduncle, equipped with 3 long distal setae and 2 short apical setae and a small, knobliked appendage, 0.2× ramus, on distal margin. +Uropod 2 +ramus very vestigial, confused with abdomen. + +Telson + +round. + + +Female (immature). +MCZ 1536. Body length +6.77 mm +. Head length +0.50 mm +and pereonite 1, +0.25 mm +; head and pereonite 1 fused, suture present; head smooth, no dorsal or lateral projections; eye round, distinctive. Pereonite 2, +1.05 mm +, dorsally smooth. Pereonite 3, +1.45 mm +. Pereonite 4, +1.30 mm +. Pereonite 5, +1.38 mm +. Pereonite 6, +0.48 mm +. Pereonite 7, +0.36 mm +. +Antenna 1 +long, length 0.9× body length; peduncular article 2 longest, 2.1× peduncular article 1; peduncular article 3, 0.73× peduncular article 2; flagellum 0.95× peduncular length with>14 articles, proximal article composed of 3 articles. +Antenna 2 +slender, 0.39× antenna 1; flagellum 0.25× peduncle, 2-articulate, article 2, 0.33× article 1. + + + +Fig. 2. + +Protella gracilis +Dana, 1853 + +, type, immature female, 6.77 mm, MCZ 1536, Balabac Strait, the Philippines, 56.7 meters or Singapore? + + + +Pereon. +Gnathopod 1 +basis subequal with ischium, merus and carpus combined. +Gnathopod 2 +begins 1/4 along anterior margin of pereonite 2, basis subequal in length with pereonite 2, longer than ischium, merus, and carpus combined; propodus 1.2× basis, longer than wide, palm of propodus, proximal projection with 1 grasping spine followed by 2 small projections, distally with 1 small projection and a sinus, followed by one larger triangular projection; dactylus slightly curved, fitting onto palm. +Gill 3 +length 0.35× pereonite 3, oval. +Pereopod 3 +subequal with gill 3 length, 0.30× pereonite 3, 1-articulate with 3 distal setae. +Gill 4 +length 0.38× pereonite 4, oval, subequal with gill 3. +Pereopod 4 +, 0.25× pereonite 4, 0.64× gill 4, smaller than pereopod 3, 1 articulate with 4 distal setae. +Pereopods 5–7 +well developed, becoming more robust progressively. +Pereopod 5 +basis with 3 setae at distal margin; carpus subequal in length with merus; propodus subequal in length with basis, proximal projection with a pair of grasping spines, distal margin of propodus with 4 short and long setae; dactylus falcate. +Pereopod 6 +basis with 3 setae on anterodistal and posterodistal corner; merus with 2 setae on posterodistal corner, carpus with one projection distally; propodus subequal in length with basis, proximal projection with a pair of grasping spines, distal margin of propodus with 8 short and long setae; dactylus falcate. +Pereopod 7 +basis subrectangular; merus with 2 setae on posterodistal margin; carpus with one projection distally; propodus proximal projection with a pair of grasping spines; distal margin of propodus with 8 short and long setae; dactylus falcate. + + + + +Remarks. + +Protella gracilis + +[sensu lato] was originally described based on a mature male and female collected from Balabac Strait, south of the +Philippine Islands +in the tropical Indo-Pacific by +Dana (1853) +. However figures of the +types +were only provided in +Dana (1855) +, showing a mature male with a short portion of antenna 1 flagellum, pereopod 7 (propodus to dactylus) and a mature female with a short portion of antenna 1 flagellum. Figures of the head and pereonite 1 of another variety as well as a portion of a female gnathopod 2 (carpus to dactylus) were also provided ( +Dana, 1855 +). A few years later, +Bate (1862) +also cited the descriptions and figures of +Dana (1853 +, +1855 +), followed by +Mayer (1882) +who referred to the distribution record of +Dana (1853) +in his description of + +Protella gracilis + +[sensu lato]. This species was then cited in +Mayer (1890) +, whereby the author provided considerably more detailed figures of + +Protella gracilis + +[sensu lato] than those of +Dana (1853 +, +1855 +) that were based on specimens collected from another locality, Misaki, situated near the opening of +Tokyo +Bay, central +Japan +. +Mayer (1890) +also stated that the present species was distributed in two localities: Balabac Strait, +Cebu +, Lapinig (on the north coast of +Bohol +), the +Philippines +, and Misaki, central +Japan +(about +48 km +south of +Tokyo +). + + +Arimoto (1929) +and +Hiro (1937) +described + +P. gracilis + +[sensu lato] from Tateyama Bay, near the opening of +Tokyo +Bay, and from Tanabe Bay, Kii Peninsula, central +Japan +, respectively. +McCain & Steinberg (1970) +then recorded the +type +locality for this species as “Balabac Strait, +Philippine Islands +, 56.7 meters” and other records as “warm water species from Indo-Pacific Islands, +Philippine Islands +, and southern +Japan +”. Following that, +Arimoto (1976) +cited the descriptions and figures of +Arimoto (1929) +and reported similar “ +type +locality” and “other records” as those of +McCain & Steinberg (1970) +. In addition, the authors also provided detailed distribution data along the Japanese coasts. + + +The identification and records of + +P. gracilis + +[sensu lato] by the various authors above have been accepted thus far. Nevertheless, in recent years, +Spalding et al. (2007) +proposed a new global system for coastal and shelf areas called the “Marine Ecoregions of the World”, a brainchild resulting from the lack of detailed and comprehensive biogeographic system to classify the oceans. This system encompasses 232 ecoregions, in 62 provinces from 12 realms. According to this new system, Balabac Strait is situated in the Central Indo-Pacific (realm), Western Coral Triangle (province), Palawan/ +North Borneo +(ecoregion), while, Misaki is situated in the Temperate Northern Pacific (realm), Warm Temperate Northwest Pacific (province), Central Kuroshio Current (ecoregion), a totally different realm from the +type +locality of + +P. gracilis + +in the Central Indo-Pacific. According to +Spalding et al. (2007) +, each realm coincides with high levels of endemism, and this prompted the present authors to revise records of + +P. gracilis + +[sensu stricto] from the +Philippines +and + +P. gracilis + +[sensu lato] from +Japan +. Furthermore, +Arimoto’s (1929) +and +Hiro’s (1937) +records of + +P. gracilis + +[sensu lato] from Tateyama Bay and Tanabe Bay, +Japan +, are both situated in the same realm and province as Misaki, +Japan +. + + + +Types +that were deposited in the +MCZ +were loaned for comparisons with specimens from +Japan +. +The +types +consist of a larger but damaged male and a smaller immature female plus six detached pereopods. +In +order to determine the origin of these pereopods (whether it belongs to the mature male or immature female), they were separated into 2 groups according to size ( +2.60–2.86 mm +and +3.48–3.52 mm +); the 3 larger pereopods were inferred to belong to the larger male while the 3 smaller ones to the immature female + +. + + +Dana (1853) +, provided the “length” of this species as “seven-eighths of an inch” (p. 813), which corresponds to +2.2 cm +. But two years later, +Dana (1855) +also provided a body length on a caption for plate 54 and noted “ + +Protella gracilis + +, male, enlarged two and a half diameters; a’, same, natural size, on a coral” (“diameters” should be cm). The body length of “a” on plate 54 is +16 mm +( +10.5 mm +from pereonites 3–7), while “length” in +Dana (1853 +, +1855 +), was +2.2–2.5 cm +(including antennae and body somites). Thus, among the two +type +specimens, i.e., the larger male of +11.17 mm +(from pereonites 3–7) described here is closer to the male described and figured in +Dana (1853 +, +1855 +). However, the mature female that was described and illustrated in +Dana (1853 +, +1855 +) is missing; therefore the immature female ( +Fig. 2 +) was described and illustrated here instead. In the vial containing the +type +specimens, the locality of the +types +were labelled as “ +Singapore +? / Balabac Str.” although the distribution of this species from +Singapore +was never recorded clearly in any taxonomical studies ( +Dana 1853 +, +1855 +, +Bate 1862 +, +Mayer 1882 +, +1890 +). Furthermore, +McCain & Steinberg (1970) +recorded the distribution of this species as “Warm water species from the Indo-Pacific Islands, +Philippine Islands +, and southern +Japan +” in their species catalogue of +Caprellidae +of the world. As a result, it is likely that the smaller immature female +type +specimen, was collected from +Singapore +and placed in the vial of the +types +after +Dana (1853 +, +1855 +), instead of the original mature female which was described and illustrated in +Dana (1853 +, +1855 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/54/87/375487C2FFA7FFA9FF4DFDCAFC7E3CF2.xml b/data/37/54/87/375487C2FFA7FFA9FF4DFDCAFC7E3CF2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3d22fe59e14 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/54/87/375487C2FFA7FFA9FF4DFDCAFC7E3CF2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,598 @@ + + + +Description of two species of Protella Dana, 1852 (Crustacea: Amphipoda): P. gracilis Dana, 1853, from Balabac Strait, the Philippines, and P. amamiensis, new species, from southern Japan + + + +Author + +Takeuchi, Ichiro + + + +Author + +Lim, Jacqueline Hui Chern + + + +Author + +Inoue, Yuki + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2014 + +2014-02-28 + + +62 + + +53 +65 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.4504140 +2345-7600 +4504140 +49925D49-4E53-42C2-92E5-0BCDF457E3D4 + + + + + + + +Protella amamiensis + +, +new species + + + + + + +( +Figs. 3–7 +) + + + + + + + +Protella gracilis + +. + + +Mayer, 1890: 21–23 + +, pl. 1 figs. 10–11, pl. 3 figs. 17–20, pl. 5 figs. 15–17, pl. 6 figs. 6, 21;? + +Arimoto, 1929: 123–126 + +, pl. 1 figs. 7–15;? + +Hiro, 1937: 311 + +, pl. 22 figs. 3–4; + +Utinomi, 1964: 14 + +, 24–25, pl. 2 fig. 4; + +McCain & Steinberg, 1970: 69–70 + +(in part);? + +Arimoto, 1976: 50–53 + +, figs. 21–22; + +Arimoto & Kikuchi, 1977: 96–97 + +, fig. 4K;? + +Arimoto, 1980: 105 + +; + +Takeuchi, 1999: 6 + +. [not + +Protella gracilis +Dana, 1853 + +]. + + + + + +Material examined. + + +Holotype + +, +1 male +, KMNH IvR 500,682, +10.35 mm +, off +Sakinome +, +Amami Oshima Island +, +Amami Islands +, +Kagoshima Prefecture +, +Japan +, +28°10'53"N +, +129°15'46"E +, hydroids, + +17 m +depth + +, + +29 August 2000 + +, coll. +K. Hagiwara. + + +Paratype + +, +1 male +, KMNH IvR 500,683, 1 mature female, KMNH IvR 500,684, 1 mature female, KMNH IvR 500,685, 5 mature females, 1 premature female and +1 juvenile +, KMNH IvR 500,686, + +2 males +and 2 mature females, +MCZ +25221 + +, + +1 male +and 2 mature females, AM-P.90992, location and station data same as holotype + +. + + + + +Type +locality. + +Amami Oshima Island +, +Amami Islands +, +Ryukyo Archipelago +, +Japan + +. + + +Other localities. +Amakusa Islands, west coast of Kyushu, western +Japan +, Tanabe Bay, Kii Peninsula, Misaki, the entrance of +Tokyo +Bay, and? Tateyama Bay, central +Japan +. + + + + +Etymology. +Named after the +type +locality, Amami Oshima Island, Amami Islands. + + + + +Description. +Male ( +holotype +), Body length, +10.86 mm +, KMNH IvR 500,682. Head, +0.61 mm +. Pereonite 1, +0.56 mm +. Head and pereonite 1 fused, suture present; head smooth, no dorsal or lateral projections; eye round, distinctive. Pereonite 2, +1.96 mm +, dorsally smooth. Pereonite 3, +2.35 mm +with 1 small anterolaeral round projection. Pereonite 4, +2.26 mm +, subequal with pereonite 3. Pereonite 5, 2.00 mm. Pereonite 6, +0.56 mm +. Pereonite 7, +0.56 mm +. +Antenna 1 +, 1.2× body length; peduncular article 1 with 5 fine/plumose proximal setae, article 2, 2.7× article 1, article 3 longest, 1.2× article 2, with fine marginal setae on inner and outer margin; flagellum 0.57× peduncle, with 19 articles, proximal article composed of 3 articles. +Antenna 2 +slender, 0.38× antenna 1; peduncular article 1 short, gland cone reaching tip of peduncular article 2; peduncular article 2 scarcely setose; peduncular article 3, 3.7× article 2 with long and short setae along ventral margin; article 4 longest, with long and short setae along ventral margin; flagellum 0.2× length of peduncle, 2-articulate, article 2, 0.2× article 1. + + + +Fig. 3. + +Protella amamiensis + +, +new species +, holotype, male, 10.35 mm, KMNH IvR 500,682 and paratype, mature female, 9.48 mm, KMNH IvR 500,684, off Sakinome, Amami Oshima Island, Amami Islands, southern Japan. + + + + +Fig. 4. + +Protella amamiensis + +, +new species +, holotype, male, 10.35 mm, KMNH IvR 500,682, off Sakinome, Amami Oshima Island, Amami Islands, southern Japan. + + + + +Fig. 5. + +Protella amamiensis + +, +new species +, holotype, male, 10.35 mm, KMNH IvR 500,682, off Sakinome, Amami Oshima Island, Amami Islands, southern Japan. + + + + +Fig. 6. + +Protella amamiensis + +, +new species +, hototype, male, 10.35 mm, KMNH IvR 500,682 (P3, P3 & GL3, P4, P4 & GL4, P5, P6, and P7) and paratype, male, 10.36 mm, KMNH KMNH IvR 500,683 [ABD(V) and (ABD(L)] off Sakinome, Amami Oshima Island, Amami Islands, southern Japan. + + + + +Fig. 7. + +Protella amamiensis + +, +new species +, paratypes, mature female, 9.48 mm, KMNH IvR 500,684 (A1, A2, G2, P3, P3 & GL3, P4, and P4 & GL4) and mature female, 10.65 mm, KMNH IvR 500,685 (ABD), off Sakinome, Amami Oshima Island, Amami Islands, southern Japan. + + + +Upper lip +notched, wider than deep, forming rounded quadrilateral projections each with rows of flake-liked structures. +Lower lip +well developed, inner lobe distal margin pubescent, shoulders broad, with fine distal setae. +Mandible left +incisor with 5 teeth, lacinia mobilis with 5 teeth followed by 3 bundled setae and row of fine setae; molar flake present, small; molar well developed, truncate, edge serrated; palp 3-articulate, article 1 shortest, article 2, 2.5× article 1, with 3 long and 3 short simple setae and 2 long distal setae, article 3 subequal in length with article 2, slightly curved, tapering towards tip with setal formula of 1-21-5-1. +Mandible right +incisor with 5 teeth, lacinia mobilis with many fine teeth followed by 3 bundled setae and row of fine setae; molar flake present, larger than left molar flake; molar well developed, truncate, terminally with teeth-liked process; palp 3-articulate, subequal in length with left mandibular palp, article 2 with 3 long and 3 short simple setae and 2 long distal setae, article 3 tapering to a pointed tip with setal formula of 1-20-5-1. +Maxilla 1 +inner plate absent; outer plate armed with 7 stout apical setal-teeth; palp biarticulate, article 1 short, article 2, 5.67× article 1, subequal in length with outer plate, terminally with 7 short and 1 long robust setae, distally with row of 3 facial slender setae. +Maxilla 2 +inner plate with 7 slender setae at distal margin; outer plate 0.7× inner plate with 14 slender apical setae. +Maxilliped +basal endite (inner plate) with 2 stout tooth and 4 simple setae apically; ischial endite (outer plate) 2.2× the length of inner plate with 2 simple setae apically, inner margin scalloped with 2 setae medially; palp 4-articulate, article 1 shortest, inner margin scarcely setose; article 2 longest, 2.3× article 1, setose on entire inner margin; article 3, 0.8× article 2, without triangular distal projection, distal margin with tuft of long and short setae; article 4 (dactylus) falcate, with row of setules on inner margin. + + +Pereon +. +Gnathopod 1 +basis subequal with merus and carpus combined; ischium posterodistal corner with several long and short setae; merus subquadrate, posteroventral corner setaceous; carpus subequal in length with propodus, posterior margin densely setaceous, facially with 4 rows of setae; propodus with 5 rows of submarginal setae, distal margin with several long setae, palm begins 1/5 along posterior margin, straight, finely setose along entire margin, with 1 robust/stout proximal seta; dactylus slightly curved, inner margin with serriformed teeth. +Gnathopod 2 +begins 1/3 along anterior margin of pereonite 2, coxa bilobate; basis 1.2× the length of pereonite 2, with an acute anterodistal projection equipped with 1 seta; ischium with an acute laterodistal projection; merus posteroventral corner with 4 setae; carpus subtriangular; propodus enlarged, 2.2× as long as wide, anterodistal corner pronounced/acute, palm begins 1/3 along posterior margin, proximal projection with 1 robust seta (grasping spine), mid-palmar triangular projection followed by a wide concaved area, and 2 additional triangular projections with a narrow sinus in between followed by a small triangular projection proximally, palm with pegs between grasping proximal and mid-palmar projection, concaved area lined with setae; dactylus falcate with fine marginal setae on inner and outer margin. +Gill 3 +length 0.6× pereonite 3, oval. +Pereopod 3 +slender, 0.3× pereonite 3, 2-articulate; article 1 long, with 5 distal setae; article 2 small, 0.04× article 1 with 1 long and 2 short apical setae. +Gill 4 +length 0.6× pereonite 4, oval. +Pereopod 4 +slender, 0.3× pereonite 4, subequal in length with pereopod 3, 2-articulate; article 1 with 6 distal setae; article 2 small, with 1 long and 2 short apical setae. Pereopods 5–7 well developed, basis and carpus of pereopods 5–7 becoming shorter and more robust progressively. +Pereopod 5 +basis and ischium with 2–5 setae on antero and posterodistal corner; merus slightly expanded posterodistally with tuft of setae; carpus longest, 1.7× merus with row of robust setae along entire inner margin, distally with one small triangular projection and 6 setae; propodus subcylindrical, same length as ischium and merus combined, with a pair of proximal grasping spines, palm with 9 setae, distal margin of propodus with group of longer setae; dactylus falcate, fitting onto palm, smooth. +Pereopod 6 +basis shorter than pereopod 5 basis (0.87× shorter), with 5–6 setae on antero and posterodistal corner; ischium 0.25× basis; merus slightly expanded posterodistally with tuft of setae; carpus 1.3× merus, with row of robust setae along entire inner margin, distally with one small triangular projection and 8 setae; propodus same length as basis, palm with a pair of proximal grasping spines followed by several fine and robust setae, outer margin of propodus becoming more dense and long moving towards distal margin; dactylus falcate, fitting onto palm, smooth. +Pereopod 7 +shorter than pereopod 5 but longer than pereopod 6, basis subequal in length with ischium and merus combined, with 3–5 setae on antero and posterodistal corner; merus expanded posterodistally; carpus subequal in length with merus, inner margin with row of robust setae, posterodistal corner with tuft of setae; propodus palm with a pair of proximal grasping spines followed by several fine and robust setae, outer margin with many long setae especially at distal margin; dactylus falcate, fitting onto palm, smooth. + + +Pleon +(based on male, body length, +10.36 mm +, KMNH IvR 500,683). +Penes +small, bilobate, positioned laterally. 2 setae present between penes and uropod 1. +Uropod 1 +peduncle with 3 long setae; ramus elongated, 7× peduncle and curved outwards, with 3–4 fine facial setae, distally with a small, knob-liked appendage, equipped with 1 short and 3 long setae. +Uropod 2 +ramus vestigial, with one seta. + +Telson + +round, with a pair of plumose setae. + + +Female +( +paratype +), Body length, +9.48 mm +, KMNH IvR 500,684. Head +0.69 mm +. Pereonite 1, +0.48 mm +. Head and pereonite 1 fused, suture present; head smooth, no dorsal or lateral projections; eye round, distinctive. Pereonite 2, +1.83 mm +, dorsally smooth. Pereonite 3, 2.00 mm. Pereonite 4, +1.56 mm +. Pereonite 5, +1.96 mm +. Pereonite 6, +0.48 mm +. Pereonite 7 equal with pereonite 6, +0.48 mm +. +Antenna 1 +long, 1.2× body length; peduncular article 1 scarcely setose, peduncular article 2, 2.7× longer than peduncular article 1, peduncular article 3 longest, 1.2× article 2, with fine marginal setae on inner and outer margin; flagellum 0.55× peduncle, with 17 articles, proximal article composed of 4 articles. +Antenna 2 +slender, 0.7× antenna 1; peduncular article 1 short, gland cone reaching tip of peduncular article 2; peduncular article 2, 2.0× article 1; peduncular article 3, 4.25× peduncular article 2 with long and short setae along ventral margin; peduncular article 4 longest, 1.24× peduncular article 3, with long and short setae along ventral margin; flagellum 0.22× length of peduncle, 2-articulate, article 2, 0.2× article 1. + + +Pereon +. +Gnathopod 2 +begins 1/3 along anterior margin of pereonite 2, coxa bilobate; basis 0.90× the length of pereonite 2, with an acute anterodistal projection equipped with 1 seta; ischium with an acute laterodistal projection; merus posteroventral corner with several setae; carpus subtriangular; propodus enlarged, 1.25× basis, 2.4× as long as wide, anterodistal corner pronounced/acute, palm begins 1/4 along posterior margin, proximal projection with 1 robust seta (grasping spine), mid-palmar triangular projection not distinct, followed by a concaved area, and 2 additional triangular projections with a narrow sinus in between, palm provided with pegs/serriformed teeth between grasping proximal and mid concaved area; dactylus falcate with fine marginal setae on inner and outer margin. +Gill 3 +length 0.8× pereonite 3, oval and elongated. +Pereopod 3 +slender, 0.36× pereonite 3, 0.46× gill 3 length, 1-articulate with 10 distal setae. +Gill 4 +length 0.9× pereonite 4, oval and elongated. +Pereopod 4 +slender, 0.40× pereonite 4, 0.44× gill 4 length, subequal in length with pereopod 3, 1-articulate with 9 distal setae. + + +Pleon +(based on mature female, body length, +10.65 mm +, KMNH IvR 500,685). +Uropod 2 +ramus vestigial, degenerated into 1 seta, present on inner margin. + +Telson + +round, with 1 pair of plumose setae and 1 pair of normal setae. + + + + +Remarks. +The present specimens of + +Protella gracilis + +[sensu lato] were collected from Amami Islands, which are situated in the northern part of the Ryukyu Archipelago between Kyushu Island and +Taiwan +. According to +Spalding et al. (2007) +, Amami Island is situated at the border of temperate and tropical regions, namely the Temperate Northern Pacific (realm), Warm Temperate Northwest Pacific (province), Central Kuroshio Current (ecoregion) and the Central Indo- Pacific (realm), South Kuroshio (province), South Kuroshio (ecoregion). + + +Compared with descriptions and figures of the +types +of + + + +Protella gracilis + +[sensu stricto], + +Protella gracilis + +[sensu + + +lato] from Amami Islands, +Japan +differs in the following + +characteristics: + +1. Pereopods 3 and 4 of the +type +specimen is 1-articulate, while that of + +P. gracilis + +[sensu lato] from Amami Islands is 2-articulate. + + +2. Penes of the +type +specimen is large with presence of 4 setae between penes and uropod 1, while + +P. gracilis + +[sensu lato] from Amami Islands is provided with 2 setae between penes and uropod 1. + + +3. Uropod 1 of the +type +specimen is short and subconical in shape with a group of 11 long setae at the base; ramus is subequal in length with peduncle with a very small knob-liked appendage. On the contrary, in + +P. gracilis + +[sensu lato] from Amami Islands, +Japan +, ramus of uropod 1 is elongated, ca. 7 times of peduncle with a knob-liked appendage at distal margin, equipped with 3 long and 1 short setae. + + +Examination of the characters above showed that the difference in number of articles in pereopods 3 and 4 (1-articulate in + +Protella gracilis + +[sensu stricto]) could be due to the condition of the old material making it difficult to observe its segmentation. Meanwhile, character of the penes and abdomen are more distinctive. These clear differences indicate that + +P. gracilis + +[sensu lato] from Amami Islands, +Japan +, is a different species from the +type + +P. gracilis + +[sensu stricto]. Moreover, the male +type + +P. gracilis + +[sensu stricto] is estimated to be larger, +13.70 mm +; by using the body somite ratio of + +P. gracilis + +[sensu lato] from Amami Islands, +9.48 mm +. Thus, + +P. gracilis + +[sensu lato] from southern +Japan +is described as a separate species, + +P. amamiensis + +, +new species +, as described in this paper. Recently, +Takeuchi & Lowry (2007b) +reported that + +Orthoprotella berentsae +Takeuchi & Lowry, 2007b + +, can be distinguished from + +O. mayeri +K. H. +Barnard, 1916 + +, mainly by the characteristics of the uropod 1, although characteristics of body somites resemble each other. + + + +Protella gracilis + +[sensu lato] was described and illustrated in detail based on specimens collected from the Temperate Northern Pacific in one of the 12 major realms (see +Mayer, 1890 +; +Arimoto, 1929 +, +1976 +). The characteristics of + +P. amamiensis + +, +new species +, agrees well with + +P. gracilis + +[sensu lato] in +Mayer (1890) +and +Arimoto (1929 +, +1976 +) in: 1) antenna 1 longer than body length; 2) antenna 1 peduncular article 3 longest; 3) propodus of gnathopod 2 has two additional triangular projections near the middle region of the palm; 4) pereopods 3 and 4 are slender; and 5) uropod 1 is elongated. However, pereopods 3 and 4 of + +P. amamiensis + +, +new species +, are 2-articulated, while those of +Mayer’s (1890) +and +Arimoto’s (1929 +, +1976 +) specimens are 1-articulated. In addition, uropod 1 of + +P. amamiensis + +, +new species +, and that of +Mayer’s (1890) +specimen is curved outwards, while +Arimoto’s (1929 +, +1976 +) specimen is curved inwards. But as mentioned above, the segmentation of pereopods 3 and 4 could be sometimes obscured. These differences indicate that + +Protella gracilis + +[sensu lato] in +Arimoto (1929 +, +1976 +) might be an undescribed species or subspecies of + +P. amamiensis + +, +new species +, endemic to the Temperate Northern Pacific. Further detailed studies on + +Protella + +spp. from different ecoregions along the +Singapore +coast and the Japanese Archipelago needs to be conducted in the near future. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/54/CB/3754CBF8B5437E81789D0C29C5AD11D0.xml b/data/37/54/CB/3754CBF8B5437E81789D0C29C5AD11D0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..60f5379f1e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/54/CB/3754CBF8B5437E81789D0C29C5AD11D0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@ + + + +Minimalist revision and description of 403 new species in 11 subfamilies of Costa Rican braconid parasitoid wasps, including host records for 219 species + + + +Author + +Sharkey, Michael J. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6201-7340 +The Hymenoptera Institute, 116 Franklin Ave., Redlands, CA, 92373, USA +msharkey@uky.edu + + + +Author + +Janzen, Daniel H. +Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 - 6018, USA + + + +Author + +Hallwachs, Winnie +Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 - 6018, USA + + + +Author + +Chapman, Eric G. +Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546 - 0091, USA + + + +Author + +Smith, M. Alex +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-2575 +Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph and Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Dapkey, Tanya +Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA + + + +Author + +Brown, Allison +Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA + + + +Author + +Ratnasingham, Sujeevan +Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA + + + +Author + +Naik, Suresh +Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA + + + +Author + +Manjunath, Ramya +Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA + + + +Author + +Perez, Kate +Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA + + + +Author + +Milton, Megan +Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA + + + +Author + +Hebert, Paul +Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA + + + +Author + +Shaw, Scott R. +Department of Ecosystem Science, University of Wyoming, 1000 East University Avenue, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA + + + +Author + +Kittel, Rebecca N. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0032-5764 +Museum Wiesbaden, Hessisches Landesmuseum fuer Kunst und Natur, Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 2, 65185 Wiesbaden, Germany + + + +Author + +Solis, M. Alma +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6379-1004 +Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agriculture Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, c / o National Museum Natural History, MRC 168, Smithsonian Institution, P. O. Box 37012, Washington, DC, 20013 - 7012, USA + + + +Author + +Metz, Mark A. +Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agriculture Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, c / o National Museum Natural History, MRC 168, Smithsonian Institution, P. O. Box 37012, Washington, DC, 20013 - 7012, USA + + + +Author + +Goldstein, Paul Z. +Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Beltsville Agriculture Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, c / o National Museum Natural History, MRC 168, Smithsonian Institution, P. O. Box 37012, Washington, DC, 20013 - 7012, USA + + + +Author + +Brown, John W. +Division of Entomology, PO Box 37012 12. National Museum of Natural History E 515 MRC 127, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA + + + +Author + +Quicke, Donald L. J. +Department of Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand + + + +Author + +Achterberg, C. van +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6495-4853 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands + + + +Author + +Brown, Brian V. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-6057 +Department of Entomology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90007, USA + + + +Author + +Burns, John M. +Division of Entomology, PO Box 37012 12. National Museum of Natural History E 515 MRC 127, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2021 + +2021-02-02 + + +1013 + + +1 +665 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1013.55600 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1013.55600 +1313-2970-1013-1 +CFDCEFBB523040339D46E302F66E9886 +E4329863A39E5EEBA395938413BDD579 + + + + +Pseudophanerotoma alanflemingi Sharkey +sp. nov. +Figure 200 + + + +Diagnostics. +BOLD:ACL3198. Consensus barcode. TATTTTATATTTTATATTTGGTATATATTCTGGTGTGTTAGGTTTGTCTTTAAGTTTATTAATTCGAATAGAATTAAGATGTTTAGGTAGATTATTAGGTAATGATCAAATTTATAATATAGTAGTAACAATTCATGCTTTTATTATAATTTTTTTTATAGTTATACCAGTTATAATTGGTGGATTTGGTAATTGATTAATTCCTTTAATAATTGGTGGGCCTGATATATCTTTTCCTCGTATAAATAATATAAGATTTTGATTATTAATTCCTTCATTATTTTTATTACTTATATCAAGTTTTGTAAATATAGGAGTAGGAACTGGTTGAACAGTTTATCCTCCTTTATCTTTAATGATAGGTCATGGTGGTATATCWGTAGATTTAGCTATTTATTCATTACATTTAGCTGGAATTTCATCAATTATAGGAGCAGTAAATTTTATTACAACAATTTTAAATATATGAAATTTAAATTTTATAGATAAATTATCTTTATTTAGTTGATCTGTTATTATTACAGCTTTATTATTATTATTATCATTACCTGTATTAGCAGGTGCTATTACTATATTATTAAGAGATCGTAATTTAAATACTAGATTTTTTGATCCAAGTGGAGGGGGGGATCCTGTTTTATATCAACATTTATTT. + + +Holotype ♀. +Guanacaste, Pailas Dos, PL12-9, 10.76, -85.3341, 809 meters, 16-23/i/2014, Malaise trap PL12-9A. Depository: CNC. + + +Host data +. + +None. + + + +Holotype voucher code +. + +BIOUG28722-F02. + + + +Paratype. +Malaise-trapped. BIOUG09826-G03. Depository: CNC. + + +Etymology. + + +Pseudophanerotoma alanflemingi + +is named to honor Mr. Alan Fleming of the Canadian National Collection and GDFCF for his extreme devotion and production with the taxonomy of ACG +Tachinidae +flies. + + + +Figure 200. + +Pseudophanerotoma alanflemingi + +, holotype. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/54/D5/3754D51A490F8370C84906FE70C0E739.xml b/data/37/54/D5/3754D51A490F8370C84906FE70C0E739.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c6ce5958aa6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/54/D5/3754D51A490F8370C84906FE70C0E739.xml @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + +Faunistic diversity of spiders (Araneae) in Galichitsa mountain (FYR Macedonia) + + + +Author + +Deltshev, Christo + + + +Author + +Komnenov, Marjan + + + +Author + +Blagoev, Gergin + + + +Author + +Georgiev, Teodor + + + +Author + +Lazarov, Stoyan + + + +Author + +Stojkoska, Emilija + + + +Author + +Naumova, Maria + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2013 + +1 + + +977 +977 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 +1314-2828-1-977 + + + + +gallicus +Xysticus +Araneae +Arachnida +Arthropoda +Animalia + + + + +Xysticus gallicus Simon, 1875 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +Occurrence: recordedBy: +C. Deltshev & M. Komnenov +; sex: +1 female +; Location: country: +FYR of Macedonia +; locality: +Galichitsa Mt., Zhichara +; verbatimElevation: 1515 m; Event: eventDate: +20-06-2008 + + + + +Distribution +Palearctic. + + +Notes +First record in Galichitsa Mt. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/55/34/375534006E3E558FB0B7515FC0FE43A0.xml b/data/37/55/34/375534006E3E558FB0B7515FC0FE43A0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d8c11958892 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/55/34/375534006E3E558FB0B7515FC0FE43A0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,322 @@ + + + +Integrative taxonomy reveals three new taxa within the Tylototriton asperrimus complex (Caudata, Salamandridae) from Vietnam + + + +Author + +Bernardes, Marta +Cologne Zoo, Riehler Str. 173, 50735 Cologne, Germany & Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Zuelpicher Str. 47 b, 50674 Cologne, Germany +mrtbernardes@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Le, Minh Duc +Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 334 Nguyen Trai Road, Hanoi, Vietnam & Central Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 19 Le Thanh Tong, Hanoi, Vietnam & Department of Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79 th Street, New York, New York 10024, USA + + + +Author + +Nguyen, Truong Quang +Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Hanoi, Vietnam & Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6601-0880 + + + +Author + +Pham, Cuong The +Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Hanoi, Vietnam & Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam + + + +Author + +Pham, Anh Van +Faculty of Natural Science and Technology, Tay Bac University, Quyet Tam Ward, Son La City, Son La Province, Vietnam + + + +Author + +Nguyen, Tao Thien +Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam & Vietnam National Museum of Nature, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet St., Hanoi, Vietnam + + + +Author + +Roedder, Dennis +Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany + + + +Author + +Bonkowski, Michael +Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Zuelpicher Str. 47 b, 50674 Cologne, Germany + + + +Author + +Ziegler, Thomas +Cologne Zoo, Riehler Str. 173, 50735 Cologne, Germany & Terrestrial Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Zuelpicher Str. 47 b, 50674 Cologne, Germany + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +935 + + +121 +164 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.935.37138 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.935.37138 +1313-2970-935-121 +4D41FCF4A59544F095EFCF38D0FC127C +33263B29FD6E5F15BCFC61C058095F9C + + + + +Tylototriton sparreboomi M. Bernardes, M. D. Le, T. Q. Nguyen, C. T. Pham, A. V. Pham, T.T. Nguyen & T. Ziegler +sp. nov. +Figures 9 +, 11 + + + + +Tylototriton +taxon 3 (this study). + + +T. +sp.: +Laking et al. 2017 +, page 2. + + +T. verrucosus +: +Orlov et al. 2002 +, page 101; +van Dijk et al. 2009 +, page 1; +Nguyen et al. 2009 +, page 329. + + +T. cf. asperrimus +"North Vietnam": +Hernandez 2018 +, page 80. + + + +Holotype. +IEBR 4476, adult male, collected in Sa De Phin Commune, Sin Ho District, Lai Chau Province, Vietnam, at an elevation of 1670 m a.s.l., in May 2015 by A. V. Pham and M. A. Vang. + + +Paratypes. +Two adult males, same data as the holotype: IEBR 4477 and TBU 10; two adult males, collector unknown: IEBR 4478 and IEBR 4479. + + +Etymology. + +The specific epithet is dedicated to late Prof. Dr. Max Sparreboom, who has made great contributions to the understanding of +Urodela +. + + + +Diagnosis. +The new species is distinguished from other species of the genus by the following combination of characters: head longer than wide; snout truncate in dorsal view; tips of fingers reaching nostril when foreleg is laid forward; skin tubercles on ventral side shaped like transverse wrinkles; rib nodules distinct and round; vertebral ridge segmented, high and relatively wide; relatively wide distance between the eyes; and gular and labial folds present. + + +Description of holotype. +Habitus stout; head broader than body, longer than wide, depressed and slightly oblique in profile; snout wider than long (IN> EN), truncate in dorsal view, rounded in profile and protruding beyond lower jaw; nostrils close to snout tip and not visible from above; labial fold slightly evident; dorsolateral bony ridges on head prominent, wide, moderately protruding, from above eye to above anterior end of parotoid, posterior ends slightly scrolled inside; middorsal ridge on head almost indistinct; parotoids enlarged, projecting backwards; ventral skin smoother than dorsal skin, with tubercles shaped like transverse wrinkles; gular fold weak; glandular vertebral ridge high, wide, smooth and segmented extending from top of head to base of tail, separated from middorsal ridge; number of trunk vertebrae 13; rib nodules distinct and roundish, the third anterior rib nodule on right side is located below the second nodule and the fourth nodule seems to not be associated with the fourth vertebra, nodules appear knob-like anteriorly, becoming smaller posteriorly; tips of fore- and hind limbs overlap when adpressed along body; tips of fingers reaching nostril when foreleg laid forward; and tail laterally compressed, thin and tip acuminated. + + +Color of holotype. + +In preservative, with an overall faded dark brown coloration, with faded yellow markings on vent, ventral margin of tail, tips of fingers and toes, and part of palms. For color in life see Fig. +9 +. + + + +Measurements of holotype (in mm). +SVL 68.71; MHW 17.60; HW 9.85; HL 19.95; PL 10.18; PH 6.12; EL 3.43; EN 4.43; IN 6.26; IE 9.04; LJL 10.74; UEL 4.74; HUM 9.27; RAD 15.86; FEM 8.77; TIB 16.03; TL 59.70; TH 8.57; ClL 9.66; WVr 2.37; L5W 3.04; AG 30.99; and TkL 42.72. + + +Variation. + +TBU 10 (in worse preserved condition) presents rib-nodules thinner than holotype, glandular vertebral ridge more tubercular, and tail tip slightly rounded. The remaining characters were similar to the holotype in morphology. For detailed measurements see Table +4 +. + + + +Comparisons. + + +Tylototriton sparreboomi + +sp. nov. differs from other related species of + +Tylototriton + +as follows: from + +T. anhuiensis + +by distinctly separated rib nodules (versus continuous nodule-like warts in + +T. anhuiensis + +); from + +T. asperrimus + +by a head longer than wide (versus wider than long in + +T. asperrimus + +according to +Nishikawa et al. 2013b +; +Sparreboom 2014 +; +Hernandez 2016 +), however the female holotype shows similar head proportions-see Discussion); from + +T. broadoridgus + +by head slightly longer than wide (versus equally long and wide), presence of skin on ventral side shaped like transverse wrinkles (versus covered with round shaped tubercles, like the dorsal side), distinctly separated rib nodules (versus continuous nodule-like warts), and narrower vertebral ridge (versus wider vertebral ridge in + +T. broadoridgus + +); from + +T. hainanensis + +by a head longer than wide (versus much wider than long), tips of fingers reaching nostril (versus eyes) when foreleg is laid forward, and a snout truncate in dorsal view (versus rounded in + +T. hainanensis + +); from + +T. liuyangensis + +by a wider (versus shorter) distance between eyes, distinctly separated rib nodules (versus continuous nodule-like warts), and lateral skin shaped like transverse wrinkles (versus covered by warts in + +T. liuyangensis + +); from + +T. notialis + +by a broader (versus narrower) head, longer (versus shorter) hind-limbs, and higher tail (versus thinner tail in + +T. notialis + +); from + +T. panhai + +by wider (versus shorter) distance between the eyes, presence (versus absence) of labial fold, and overall dorsal coloration mostly dark (versus with presence of characteristic dorsal colorful markings in + +T. panhai + +); from + +T. pasmansi + +sensu lato by a narrower (versus wider) head, slightly wider (versus slightly narrower) distance between the eyes, tips of fingers reaching nostril (versus eye) when foreleg laid forward, longer (versus shorter) humerus length, and slightly enlarged round-like rib nodules (versus slightly smaller, pointy to rounded rib nodules in + +T. pasmansi + +sensu lato); from + +T. p. pasmansi + +by a longer (versus shorter) length between eye and nostril and wider (versus narrower) vertebral ridge in + +T. p. pasmansi + +; from + +T. pasmansi obsti + +by a longer (versus shorter) femur length; from + +T. vietnamensis + +by a moderately stout (versus slender) habitus, presence (versus absence) of gular fold, and round (versus slightly flattened) rib nodules and high vertebral ridge (versus low vertebral ridge in + +T. vietnamensis + +); from + +T. wenxianensis + +by a truncate (versus more rounded) snout in dorsal view, wider (versus narrower) distance between the eyes, distinctly separated rib nodules (versus continuous nodule-like warts), smoother (versus extremely rough) skin on ventral side shaped like transverse wrinkles (versus rounded shaped and uniform to dorsal side), and colored marking on ventral slit (versus black colored ventral slit in + +T. wenxianensis + +); from + +T. ziegleri + +by a head longer than wide (versus wider than long), rounded but smaller (versus enlarged knob-like) rib nodules, and distinctly segmented vertebral ridge (versus even more segmented vertebral ridge in + +T. ziegleri + +). + + + +Figure 11. + +Tylototriton sparreboomi + +sp. nov. (holotype). In sequence: dorsal view; ventral view; lateral view; and detail of dorsal view of the head. Photographs T. Ziegler. + + + + +Distribution. + +Known only from the type locality in Lai Chau Province, northern Vietnam (Fig. +2 +). + + + +Natural history. + +Specimens were found in water between 9:00 and 16:30 h in ponds. The surrounding habitat was secondary forest of large, medium and small hardwoods mixed with shrubs and vines. Air temperature at the sites was 23 to 27 °C and relative humidity was 80 to 85%. Based on remote sensing information, the species occurs at sites with an annual mean temperature of 19.3 °C, ranging from 11.6 to 26.1 °C during the year. Annual precipitation is about 1843.7 mm with yearly variations from 9.6 to 421.6 mm. Further bioclimatic information is provided in Table +6 +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/55/9B/37559B4A8B3FF92B66EFBD89538A5F67.xml b/data/37/55/9B/37559B4A8B3FF92B66EFBD89538A5F67.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..00e4347a978 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/55/9B/37559B4A8B3FF92B66EFBD89538A5F67.xml @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Tenthredo pini +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + +T. antennis pectinatis lanceolatis, thorace subvilloso. + +Uddm. diss. +90. +f. +13. + + + + +Habitat in +Pini +foliis. + + + + +Mas niger tibiis femoribusque fulvis. Femina duplo +major grisea, antennis serratis. + + +Larva caerulea extremitatibus fulvis. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/55/C1/3755C1A055507A9F821CBA95008862FB.xml b/data/37/55/C1/3755C1A055507A9F821CBA95008862FB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d01e8cb7faa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/55/C1/3755C1A055507A9F821CBA95008862FB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +Diagnosen neuer und wenig gekannter Formiciden. + + + +Author + +Mayr, G. + +text + + +Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien + + +1866 + +16 + + +885 +908 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/4366/4366.pdf + +journal article +4366 +82806E3C-5E36-41B2-891A-EA434362ACBC + + + + + +Pristomyrmex + +nov. gen +. (Fig. 13.) + + + +[[ worker ]] Mandibulae apicem versus parum dilatatae, margine masticatorio antice bidentato postice crenulato (indistincte dentato). Clypeus trapezoideus inter antennarum articulationes intersertus, antice latior, postice angustior, planus, porrectus, antice protecto simile mandibulas partim tegens, at ab his distans, carina acuta mediana longitudinali percurrenti et carinis duabus lateralibus, retro convergentibus, fossas antennales intus terminantibus, margine antico distincte crenato, angulis duobus anticis extra continuatis in laminam acutam fossam antennalem confinentem. Antennae 11 articulatae, scapo longo gracili, ante apicem paulo curvato, funiculo cum clava triarticulata, ceteris articulis paulo longiori. Laminae frontales angustissimae, carinaeformes, postice versus fortiter divergentes. Area frontalis, sulcus frontalis et ocelli nulla. Oculi rotundati, vix pone capitis laterum medietatem. Caput subrotundatum postice arcuatim emarginatum. Thorax brevis, quadrilaterus, supra trapezoideus, antice latior, sine ulla sutura, planatus, longitrorsum paulo convexus, angulis anticis subrectis obtusiusculis; pronotum ante angulos anguste transversim constrictum, infra utrimque dente trigono acuto, carina transversa acuta angulos conjungenti; mesanotum utrimque paulo vero distincte triangulatim productum; metanotum postice spinis duabus perlongis, metanoti parte basali transverso-rectangulari multo longioribus, basi modice dilatatis, apice acutissimis, oblique retro et supra versus directis atque paulo divergentibus; metanoti pars declivis subverticalis cum parte basali fere angulum rectum formans. Petioli articulus primus non petiolatus, supra postice nodo rotundato-transverso, parum elevato, marginibus lateralibus a spiraculis ad marginem posticum parallelis; articulus secundus rotundato-transverso-cuboideus, articulo primo paulo latior, infra antice spinula minuta distincta. Abdomen subglobosum, fere tote a segmento primo obtectum. Pedes graciles calcaribus posterioribus simplicibus. + + + +Diese Gattung hat mit +Tetramorium +einige Aehnlichkeit, doch weicht sie durch die 11 gliedrigen Fuehler, das erste Stielchenglied, besonders aber durch den Clypeus ab. Waehrend sich bei +Tetramorium +der Vordertheil des Clypeus nach abwaerts zum Mundrande kruemmt, ¡ st bei +Pristomyrmex +der Clypeus flach, nicht nach abwaerts gekruemmt und bedeckt wie ein Vordach einen Theil der Mandibeln, bleibt aber in einiger Entfernung von denselben. Das Stielchen hat einige Aehnlichkeit mit dem von +Myrmecina +, indem das erste Glied vorne nicht, wie bei +Tetramorium +, gestielt ist (nur das vorderste Ende unmittelbar hinter dem Gelenkskopfe zeigt eine sehr schmale starke halsfoermige Einschnuerung), sondern parallele Seitenraender hat und das zweite Glied unten vorne mit einem kurzen Doernchen versehen ist. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/55/E2/3755E28BDC150C109AA1A964D498CD9C.xml b/data/37/55/E2/3755E28BDC150C109AA1A964D498CD9C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ca3ce0c8262 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/55/E2/3755E28BDC150C109AA1A964D498CD9C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,833 @@ + + + +Biodiversity inventories in high gear: DNA barcoding facilitates a rapid biotic survey of a temperate nature reserve + + + +Author + +Telfer, Angela C +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +atelfer@uoguelph.ca + + + +Author + +Young, Monica R +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Quinn, Jenna +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Perez, Kate +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sobel, Crystal N +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sones, Jayme E +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Levesque-Beaudin, Valerie +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Derbyshire, Rachael +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Fernandez-Triana, Jose +CNC, Ottawa, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0425-0309 + + + +Author + +Rougerie, Rodolphe +Museum national d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France + + + +Author + +Thevanayagam, Abinah +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Boskovic, Adrian +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Borisenko, Alex V +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3061-3057 + + + +Author + +Cadel, Alex +University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada + + + +Author + +Brown, Allison +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Pages, Anais +Universite de Montpellier, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Castillo, Anibal H +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1537-0528 + + + +Author + +Nicolai, Annegret +EcoBio, Universite of Rennes, Rennes, France + + + +Author + +Glenn Mockford, Barb Mockford +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Bukowski, Belen +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Wilson, Bill +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Trojahn, Brock +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Lacroix, Carole Ann +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Herbarium, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Brimblecombe, Chris +University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand + + + +Author + +Hay, Christoper +University of Western Ontario, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Ho, Christmas +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Steinke, Claudia +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Warne, Connor P +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Garrido Cortes, Cristina +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Engelking, Daniel +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Wright, Danielle +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lijtmaer, Dario A +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Gascoigne, David +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Hernandez Martich, David +Universidad Autonoma de Santo Domingo DR, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic + + + +Author + +Morningstar, Derek +Myotistar, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Neumann, Dirk +SNSB, Zoologische Staatssammlung Muenchen, Munich, Germany + + + +Author + +Steinke, Dirk +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Marco DeBruin, Donna DeBruin +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Dobias, Dylan +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sears, Elizabeth +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Richard, Ellen +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Damstra, Emily +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Zakharov, Evgeny V +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Laberge, Frederic +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Collins, Gemma E +University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand + + + +Author + +Blagoev, Gergin A +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Grainge, Gerrie +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Ansell, Graham +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Meredith, Greg +Grand River Conservation Authority, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Hogg, Ian +University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand + + + +Author + +McKeown, Jaclyn +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Topan, Janet +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Bracey, Jason +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Guenther, Jerry +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Sills-Gilligan, Jesse +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Addesi, Joseph +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Persi, Joshua +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Layton, Kara K S +The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia + + + +Author + +D'Souza, Kareina +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Dorji, Kencho +National Biodiversity Centre, Thimphu, Bhutan + + + +Author + +Grundy, Kevin +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Nghidinwa, Kirsti +Ministry of Environment and Tourism in Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia + + + +Author + +Ronnenberg, Kylee +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lee, Kyung Min +University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland + + + +Author + +Xie, Linxi +The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Lu, Liuqiong +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Penev, Lyubomir +Pensoft, Sofia, Bulgaria +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2186-5033 + + + +Author + +Gonzalez, Mailyn +Instituto de Investigacion de Recursos Biologicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogota, Colombia + + + +Author + +Rosati, Margaret E +Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, United States of America + + + +Author + +Kekkonen, Mari +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Kuzmina, Maria +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Iskandar, Marianne +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Mutanen, Marko +University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland + + + +Author + +Fatahi, Maryam +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Pentinsaari, Mikko +University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland + + + +Author + +Bauman, Miriam +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Nikolova, Nadya +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Ivanova, Natalia V +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Jones, Nathaniel +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Weerasuriya, Nimalka +The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Monkhouse, Norman +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lavinia, Pablo D +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Jannetta, Paul +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Hanisch, Priscila E +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +McMullin, R. Troy +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Herbarium, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Ojeda Flores, Rafael +Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico + + + +Author + +Mouttet, Raphaelle +ANSES, Laboratoire de la Sante des Vegetaux, Montferrier sur Lez, France + + + +Author + +Vender, Reid +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Labbee, Renee N +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Forsyth, Robert +New Brunswick Museum, Saint John, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9637-0158 + + + +Author + +Lauder, Rob +London Homeopathy, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Dickson, Ross +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Kroft, Ruth +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Miller, Scott E +Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, United States of America + + + +Author + +MacDonald, Shannon +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Panthi, Sishir +Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal + + + +Author + +Pedersen, Stephanie +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sobek-Swant, Stephanie +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Naik, Suresh +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lipinskaya, Tatsiana +Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus + + + +Author + +Eagalle, Thanushi +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Decaens, Thibaud +Universite de Montpellier Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Kosuth, Thibault +Universite de Montpellier, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Braukmann, Thomas +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Woodcock, Tom +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Roslin, Tomas +University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland + + + +Author + +Zammit, Tony +Grand River Conservation Authority, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Campbell, Victoria +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Dinca, Vlad +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Peneva, Vlada +Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria + + + +Author + +Hebert, Paul D N +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +deWaard, Jeremy R +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +dewaardj@uoguelph.ca + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +6313 +6313 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6313 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6313 +1314-2828-3-e6313 +FFE5FF837519E9253D17614AFFA8FFC1 +574474 + + + + +Dryopteris carthusiana (Vill.) H.P. Fuchs + + + +Notes +or spinulosa + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/56/F1/3756F1CCE972F6C4884A6C9637728BA0.xml b/data/37/56/F1/3756F1CCE972F6C4884A6C9637728BA0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5ced475930a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/56/F1/3756F1CCE972F6C4884A6C9637728BA0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Gentiana saponaria +, +spec. nov. + + + +6. Gentiana corollis quinquefidis campanulatis ventricosis verticillatis, foliis trinerviis. + +Gentiana floribus ventricosis campanulatis erectis quinquefidis, foliis ovato-lanceolatis. +Gron. virg.29. + + +Gentiana virginiana, saponariae folio, flore caeruleo longiore. +Moris. hist. 3. p.484. s.12. t.5. f.4. Catesb. car. 1. p.70. t.70. + + + + +Habitat in +Virginia +. ♃ + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/57/1E/37571EF4713958DDBEC99D90BF0DB8D7.xml b/data/37/57/1E/37571EF4713958DDBEC99D90BF0DB8D7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1fdef89c99c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/57/1E/37571EF4713958DDBEC99D90BF0DB8D7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,489 @@ + + + +New contributions to Diatrypaceae from karst areas in China + + + +Author + +Long, Sihan +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8346-3646 +State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China & The High Efficacy Application of Natural Medicinal Resources Engineering Center of Guizhou Province (The Key Laboratory of Optimal Utilization of Natural Medicine Resources), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University, University Town, Guian New District, Guizhou 550025, China + + + +Author + +Liu, Lili +Immune Cells and Antibody Engineering Research Center of Guizhou Province / Key Laboratory of Biology and Medical Engineering, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China + + + +Author + +Pi, Yinhui +State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China + + + +Author + +Wu, Youpeng +State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China + + + +Author + +Lin, Yan +State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China + + + +Author + +Zhang, Xu +State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China + + + +Author + +Long, Qingde +State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China + + + +Author + +Kang, Yingqian +Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control, Ministry of Education of Guizhou and Guizhou Talent Base for Microbiology and Human Health, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China + + + +Author + +Kang, Jichuan +Engineering and Research Center for Southwest Bio-Pharmaceutical Resources of National Education Ministry of China, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China + + + +Author + +Wijayawardene, Nalin N. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-5498 +State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China & Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biological Resource and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan 655011, China + + + +Author + +Wang, Feng +Guizhou Provincial Academician Workstation of Microbiology and Health, Guizhou Academy of Tobacco Science, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550000, China + + + +Author + +Shen, Xiangchun +State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China & The High Efficacy Application of Natural Medicinal Resources Engineering Center of Guizhou Province (The Key Laboratory of Optimal Utilization of Natural Medicine Resources), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University, University Town, Guian New District, Guizhou 550025, China + + + +Author + +Li, Qirui +State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China & The High Efficacy Application of Natural Medicinal Resources Engineering Center of Guizhou Province (The Key Laboratory of Optimal Utilization of Natural Medicine Resources), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guizhou Medical University, University Town, Guian New District, Guizhou 550025, China +lqrnd2008@163.com + +text + + +MycoKeys + + +2021 + +2021-08-20 + + +83 + + +1 +37 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.83.68926 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.83.68926 +1314-4049-83-1 +88E0078723225DC08CFA446EB354D0B6 + + + + +Diatrypella pseudooregonensis S.H. Long & Q.R. Li +sp. nov. + + + + +Fig. 4 + + + +Holotype. +GMB0041 + + +Etymology. + +Refers to its similar species of + +Diatrype oregonensis + +. + + + +Description. + +Saprobic +on decaying branches of unidentified plant. +Sexual morph +: +Stromata +pustulate, with groups of 3-16 perithecia, rugose, visible as black, erumpent, scattered, surrounded by a thin, black line in host tissue, solitary to gregarious, 1-3 mm long and 0.5-2 mm broad (av. = 2 +x +1.5 mm, n = 30), about 1 mm thick. +Endostroma +white to light yellow. +Ostiole +opening separately, papillate or apapillate, central. +Perithecium +immersed in stroma, globose to subglobose, glabrous, with cylindrical neck, brevicollous or longicollous 218.5-465 +μm +high, 112-257 +μm +diam. (av. = 306 +x +164 +μm +, n = 10), globose to subglobose, glabrous, ostioles individual. +Peridium +: 30-50 +μm +thick, dark brown to hyaline with +textura angularis +cell layers. +Asci +95-149 +x +6.5-11.5 +μm +(av. = 120 +x +10.5 +μm +, n = 30), 8-spored, unitunicate, clavate or cylindrical, long-stalked, apically rounded, apical rings inamyloid. +Ascospores +11-16 +x +1.5-3.5 +μm +(av. = 14 +x +2.5 +μm +, n = 30), irregularly arranged, allantoid, slightly or moderately curved, subhyaline to slightly brown, smooth, aseptate, usually with two oil droplets. +Asexual morph +: undetermined. + + + +Figure 4. + +Diatrypella pseudooregonensis + +(GMB0041, +holotype +) +A +stromata on host substrate +B, C +stromata on host substrate +D +transverse section through ascostroma +E +vertical section through ascostroma +F +culture on PDA +G +section through the ascostroma +H +ostiolar canal +I, J +asci +K-N +ascospores. Scale bars: 20 +μm +( +G +); 10 +μm +( +H-N +). + + + + +Culture characteristics. +Ascospores germinating on PDA within 24 hours. Colonies on PDA, white when young, became pale brown, dense, but thinning towards the edge, margin rough, white from above, white at margin and light brown at centre from below, no pigmentation produced on PDA medium, no conidia observed on PDA or on OA media. + + +Specimens examined. + + +China +, +Yunnan Province +, +Baoshan City +, +Lancang River Nature Reserve +( +25°1'19.88"N +, +99°35'30.68"E +) on branches of an unidentified plant, +5 October 2019 +. +Altitude +: + +2677 m + +, +Y.H. Pi +& +Qiong Zhang, LC +323 (GMB0041, + +holotype + +, KUN-HKAS 112646, +isotype +, ex-type living culture GMBC0041) + + + + +Additional specimens examined. + + +China +, +Yunnan Province +, +Baoshan City +, +Lancang River Nature Reserve +( +25°1'13.51"N +, +99°35'25.59"E +) on branches of an unidentified plant, +6 October 2019 +. +Altitude +: + +2630 m + +, +Y.H. Pi +& +Qiong Zhang, LC +384 (GMB0043, KUN-HKAS 112681, living culture GMBC0043) + +; + +China +, +Yunnan Province +, +Baoshan City +, +Lancang River Nature Reserve +( +25°1'15.00"N +, +99°35'39.73"E +) on branches of an unidentified plant, +5 October 2019 +. +Altitude +: + +2698 m + +, +Y.H. Pi +& +Qiong Zhang, LC +312 (GMB0040, KUN-HKAS 112674, living culture GMBC0040) + +; + +China +, +Yunnan Province +, +Baoshan City +, +Lancang River Nature Reserve +( +25°35'19.09"N +, +99°35'19.09"E +) on branches of an unidentified plant, +5 October 2019 +. +Altitude +: + +2569 m + +, +Y.H. Pi +& +Qiong Zhang, LC +193 (GMB0039, KUN-HKAS 112667, living culture GMBC0039) + +; + +China +, +Yunnan Province +, +Baoshan City +, +Lancang River Nature Reserve +( +25°1'9.11"N +, +99°35'24.80"E +) on branches of an unidentified plant, +5 October 2019 +. +Altitude +: + +2649 m + +, +Y.H. Pi +& +Qiong Zhang, LC +335 (GMB0042, KUN-HKAS 112647, living culture GMBC0042) + +; + +China +, +Guizhou Province +, +Anshun City +, +Pingba District +( +26°25'9.65"N +, +106°24'24.48"E +) on branches of an unidentified plant, +1 August 2020 +. +Altitude +: + +1250 m + +, +Y.H.Pi +, PB51 (GMB0044, KUN-HKAS 112693, living culture GMBC0044) + +. + + +Additional sequences. +GMB0041 (LSU: +MW797062 +, RPB2: +MW814906 +); GMB0043 (LSU: +MW797064 +, RPB2: +MW814907 +); GMB0040 (LSU: +MW797061 +, RPB2: +MW814905 +); GMB0039 (LSU: +MW797059 +, RPB2: +MW814904 +); GMB0042 (LSU: +MW797063 +); GMLB0044 (LSU: +MW979054 +, RPB2: +MW814899 +). + + +Note. +Morphologically, + +Diatrype + +has 8 ascospores in a single ascus, while + +Diatrypella + +has more than eight ascospores in each ascus ( +Senanayake et al. 2015 +). However, previous research (e.g. +Acero et al. 2004 +and +Trouillas et al. 2011 +) suggested that both + +Diatrypella + +and + +Diatrype + +are polyphyletic within the family. In the phylogenetic analyses, + +Diatrypella pseudooregonensis + +grouped closely to the + +D. verruciformis + +and thus, we consider this new species to belong in the genus + +Diatrypella + +, because it is doubtful whether the number of ascospores per asci is useful as a basis for generic classification. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/57/2C/37572C501B249573CAEBB6B471A82D45.xml b/data/37/57/2C/37572C501B249573CAEBB6B471A82D45.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b3995a34d8e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/57/2C/37572C501B249573CAEBB6B471A82D45.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Generic revision and species classification of the Microdontinae (Diptera, Syrphidae) + + + +Author + +Reemer, Menno + + + +Author + +Stahls, Gunilla + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +288 + + +1 +213 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.288.4095 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.288.4095 +1313-2970-288-1 + + + + +Carreramyia Doesburg +stat. n. +Figs 38-41 + + + + +Carreramyia +van Doesburg, 1966: 93. Type species: +Microdon megacephalus +Shannon, 1925: 213, by original designation. + + + +Description. + +Body length: 5-8 mm. Yellowish brown or black flies, tergites sometimes yellow with dark vittae. Mimics of stingless, +Trigona +-like bees ( +Apidae +: +Meliponini +), due to the brush-like pilosity of the hind tibiae and the more or less triangular abdomen. Head wider than thorax. Face more or less straight in profile; wider than eye. Lateral oral margins not produced. Vertex strongly produced. Occiput ventrally narrow, dorsally widened. Eye bare. Eyes in male not approaching each other; separated over distance much wider than antennal fossa. Antennal fossa about as high as wide. Antenna longer than distance between antennal fossa and anterior oral margin. Antenna inserted below dorsal eye margin; basoflagellomere at least four times as long as scape, bifurcate in male, unfurcate in female; bare. Postpronotum pilose. Anepisternum without sulcus; continually pilose on dorsal half, bare on ventral half. Anepimeron pilose on dorsal half, bare on ventral half. Katepimeron convex; bare. Wing: vein R4+5 without posterior appendix; vein M1 perpendicular to R4+5 and M; crossvein r-m located close to bm-cu. Abdomen more or less triangular, with tergites 3 and 4 narrower than tergite 2. Tergites 3 and 4 fused. Sternite 1 bare or pilose. Male genitalia: phallus straight, furcate near apex; hypandrium with bulb-like base and basolateral bulges; epandrium without ventrolateral ridge. + + + +Diagnosis. +Hind tibia widened and with long, brush-like pilosity. Vein R4+5 without posterior appendix. Vertex strongly produced but not shining and convex. Basoflagellomere at least four times as long as scape, bifurcate in male. + + +Diversity and distribution. + +Described species: 2. Only the type species, +Carreramyia megacephalus +(Shannon, 1925), is known from more than one specimen (Panama and Costa Rica). The other species was found in Peru. Descriptions of two additional species from Peru and Surinam are in preparation by the first author. Apparently the genus is widespread in the Neotropical region. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/57/3E/37573EF101155D50B0E2F97D5C9E6F36.xml b/data/37/57/3E/37573EF101155D50B0E2F97D5C9E6F36.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74c4171acbf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/57/3E/37573EF101155D50B0E2F97D5C9E6F36.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Checklist of digeneans (Platyhelminthes, Trematoda, Digenea) of Georgia + + + +Author + +Arabuli, Lela +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9921-6343 +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia +lela.arabuli.1@iliauni.edu.ge + + + +Author + +Murvanidze, Lali +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia + + + +Author + +Faltynkova, Anna +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-5881 +Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic + + + +Author + +Mumladze, Levan +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-6973 +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2024 + +2024-01-08 + + +12 + + +110201 +110201 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e110201 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e110201 +1314-2828-12-e110201 +2E017986F1F55AB49BD4F0A41AB76F82 + + + + +Euclinostomum heterostomum (Rudolphi, 1809) Travassos, 1928 + + + + +Euclinostomum skrjabini +Kurashvili, 1948 + + + +Parasite of + +birds - +Ardeidae +: + +Ardea cinerea + +, + +A. purpurea + +. + + +Site of infection +: oesophagus. + + + +Distribution + +In the Holarctic Region, India, Southeast Asia, Africa; +in Georgia +: EG: Dusheti - Bazaleti Lake, Tbilisi - Digomi, Tsalka reported by +Kurashvili (1948) +, +Kurashvili (1950) +, +Kurashvili (1953a) +, +Kurashvili (1957) +and +Kurashvili (1961a) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/57/4A/37574AEA6BFDA87E0061C0B8629C4BEF.xml b/data/37/57/4A/37574AEA6BFDA87E0061C0B8629C4BEF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4be9b596170 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/57/4A/37574AEA6BFDA87E0061C0B8629C4BEF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part C) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +370 +473 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Croton moluccanus +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 1005. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Zeylona, Moluccis." RCN: 7283. + + + + +Lectotype +(Prain in +Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew +1918: 67. 1918): Herb. Hermann 1: 33, No. 346 (BM-000594464) + +. + + + + +Current name: + + +Givotia moluccana + +(L.) Sreem. + +( +Euphorbiaceae +). + + + + +Note: +Specific epithet spelled +"moluccanum" +in the protologue. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/57/D2/3757D2157ED92F2F49EE76FB57492A6E.xml b/data/37/57/D2/3757D2157ED92F2F49EE76FB57492A6E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9d26bea7cd2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/57/D2/3757D2157ED92F2F49EE76FB57492A6E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@ + + + +Biologia Centrali-Americana; or, contributions to the knowledge of the fauna and flora of Mexico and Central America. Insecta. Hymenoptera. 3 (Formicidae). + + + +Author + +Forel, A. + +text + +1899 +Unknown Publisher + +London + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/8170/8170.pdf + +book +8170 + + + + + + + + +AZTECA + + + + +. + + + + +Azteca +, Forel, Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. (2) xv. p. 384 (1878); Dalla Torre, Cat. Hymen. vii. p. 163. + + + + +L'examen d'un grand nombre de [[ male ]] et de [[ queen ]] d' +Azteca +me permet de declarer constant et definitif le type de leur aile que j'ai indique sur celui d'un hermaphrodite de l'A. +muelleri +. Elles n'ont qu'une cellule cubitale. La nervure transverse s'unit a la nervure cubitale a son point de partage. La cellule radiale est fermee. Cela distingue ce genre des +Liometopum +et de presque tous les +Dolichoderinae +. + + +Il est fort singulier que jusqu'a ces dernieres annees, specialement jusqu'a la belle monographie d' Emery [Mem. Accad. Sci. Bologna, (5) iii. pp. 119 - 152 (1893), Monogr. Gen. +Azteca +, Forel], ce genre si considerable et si abondant dans les forets tropicales de l'Amerique n'ait ete connu que par deux ou trois especes, dont on ignorait meme les [[ male ]]. Fritz Mueller a rendu ces fourmis celebres par sa decouverte de la symbiose de l' +Azteca muelleri, Emery +, avec le Cecropia peltata a Blumenau, arbre qui donne a + + +l' +Azteca +sa nourriture, tandis que celle-ci le defend contre la destruction de ses feuilles par les +Atta +. + + +En Colombie j'ai eu l'occasion d'observer beaucoup d' +Azteca +, car la foret en est remplie. Leurs moeurs - etudiees malheureusement seulement a la course, pendant un court voyage - offrent beaucoup de points communs: + + +Les +Azteca +sont (sauf une seule espece parmi celles que j'ai observees) toutes tres guerrieres, vivent exclusivement sur les arbres, ou peu s'en faut, marchent en relevant l'abdomen qu'elles font pirouetter en tout sens, comme les +Tapinoma +, ce qui correspond a la forme de cet organe et du pedicule. Sans exception, elles repandent toutes une +forte +odeur de +Tapinoma +des qu'on les inquiete, et c'est cette secretion de leurs glandes anales qui les rend si redoutables. Je les ai vu mettre ainsi en desarroi et en fuite une armee d' +Eciton hamatum +bien plus gros qu'elles et arme d'un aiguillon. + + + +Les + +Azteca +font leur nid soit dans des arbres creux, soit en carton, sur les troncs ou les branches d'arbres. Leurs nids de carton sont tres elegants, suspendus autour des derniers rameaux, parmi les feuilles (voir Tab. II. fig. 3) ( +Azteca chartifex +), ou a des branches plus fortes en forme de cone renverse ou de stalactite, ou encore adosses a un tronc ou a une branche en forme d'outre, avec le bas renfle et le haut plus ou moins raminci. Ces nids, surtout les grands, adosses aux troncs ou a de grosses branches, ont une surface curieusement sculptee, c'est a dire que le carton y forme des bas reliefs en forme de larmes geantes et aplaties. Les nids sont en general elargis et arrondis en bas, attenues en haut. On distingue par cet aspect les nids d' +Azteca +des nids de termites dans la foret. Souvent ils sont a une grande hauteur qui empeche de les atteindre. Pour m'en procurer un pareil, j'ai du faire abattre au machete un grand Cecropia, par notre guide. Quelques-uns etaient assez bas pour etre atteints. Le carton de ces nids est delicat et friable, varie du reste selon les especes. Tandis que l' +A. chartifex, r. multinida +, fait des nids gros comme le poing, d'autres especes en forment de fort grands. J'en ai mesure un ( +Azteca lacrymosa +) de 70 centimetres de hauteur sur 40 cm. de largeur et 20 cm. d'epaisseur, adosse au tronc d'un arbre. + + +Les +Azteca +forment souvent des colonies sur le meme arbre, c'est a dire que la meme fourmiliere y construit plusieurs nids qui demeurent en relations constantes d'amitie les uns avec les autres. Des observateurs superficiels ont pris ces nids pour des nids de termites envahis par des fourmis. Il n'est cependant pas difficile de les distinguer de ceux des termites arboricoles qui sont beaucoup plus durs et ont une autre architecture interne et externe. L'enveloppe lacrymiforme des nids d' +Azteca +cartonnieres est formee d'une mince couche de carton qui menage de nombreuses ouvertures cachees comme des meurtrieres sous les " larmes " citees plus haut, de sorte qu'on ne les voit qu'en regardant obliquement. Les cases et galeries periferiques du nid sont plus ou moins aplaties et cette partie est tres fragile. Au centre par contre, les cases sont plus arrondies et le carton est plus consistant. + + + + +Un grand nombre d'autres +Azteca +vivent dans les arbres creux. Il m'a ete en somme impossible, faute de temps et d'instruments, de constater si ces dernieres font oui ou non un nid en carton dans l'interieur de l'arbre, comme le +Lasius fuliginosus +et le +Liometopum microcephalum +d'Europe. Cela ne parait pas etre le cas de Y +Azteca muelleri +, observee par Fritz Mueller, mais l' +Azteca constructor +, Emery, construit un nid de carton dans les cavites de son Cecropia. Je considere la chose comme probable pour les especes qui n'offrent pas de symbiose ou d'adaptation speciale. Dans un arbre creux a S. Antonio, j'ai pu sortir un peu de carton du nid d'une +Azteca +. C'est la seule fois que cela m'a ete possible. J'ai enfin observe deux especes d' +Azteca +dont l'une habite sur les rochers de la foret dans des galeries de carton qui serpentent sur +ces +rochers comme celles du +Cremastogaster stollii +sur les arbres, tandis que l'autre ( +A. hypophylla +, +n. sp. +) vit sous les feuilles d'une plante grimpante. Les feuilles de cette plante s'appliquent tres exactement, plus encore que celles du lierre, contre l' ecorce de l'arbre. L' +Azteca +se borne a coller entierement le bord de la feuille a l' ecorce avec son carton et vit avec sa famille sous les feuilles ainsi transformees en loges tres aplaties. Le corps de cette +Azteca +est aussi tres aplati. D'autres especes sont adaptees a certaines plantes d'une facon ou de l'autre. + + + +Sauf + +cette derniere espece, toutes les +Azteca +que j'ai vues, tant les cartonnieres que celles qui vivent dans le creux des arbres, sortent en masse et avec fureur, des qu'on approche de leur arbre. Lorsqu'on frappe l'arbre avec force, c'est une legion de ces petits defenseurs qui sort de partout et se jette avec rage sur l'agresseur. Il n'est pas commode de prendre un nid d' +Azteca +en carton. En un instant on est couvert de fourmis de la tete aux pieds. N'ayant pas d'aiguillon, elles ne peuvent cependant que mordre, chatouiller et repandre la secretion odorante de leurs glandes anales. + + +Autant que j'ai pu en juger, les +Azteca +paraissent etre surtout carnivores et vivre de rapines. Elles considerent leur arbre comme leur domaine qu'elles se disputent avec les +Pseudomyrma +. Mais il est probable qu'il y en a d'autres qui se nourrissent plutot de substances vegetales, comme l' +A. muelleri +. Ce sont surtout les +Azteca +qui sont les reines des arbres de la foret vierge americaine, et je commence a croire que les epines et les poils laineux des +Atta +leur servent surtout a se proteger contre les +Azteca +. Quant on ne visite que les ports et les lieux cultives, on ne se doute pas de la presence des +Azteca +dans la faune americaine. Il faut entrer dans la veritable foret vierge ou au moins sur ses confins pour les trouver et observer leur role. + + +La symbiose de Y +Azteca muelleri +avec le Cecropia peltata est un cas special qu'il faut se garder de generaliser pour le genre +Azteca +. Wasmann a fait observer que le mimetisme ne se developpe que lorsque la forme du corps, la couleur ou les m oe urs d'une espece lui avaient deja prepare le terrain, c'est a dire lorsque des analogies fortuites preexistantes avaient prepare un avantage a ceux des individus dont l'analogie s'accentue tout specialement. Eh bien! il me parait en etre de meme avec la symbiose. - Natura non fecit saltum. Nous avons vu l'instinct du jardinage des champignons se developper peu a peu chez les Attii. De meme je crois que la symbiose de l' +Azteca muelleri +s'est developpee en partant de la base biologique generale des +Azteca +, dont le domaine sont les arbres, qui vivent dans leurs cavites et qui defendent ce domaine avec acharnement contre les ravages des Atta phyllotomes. De ce fait general a l'adaptation speciale de telle ou telle espece d' +Azteca +a un arbre special et surtout a un Cecropia, dont le tronc est creux, il n'y a qu'un pas bien facile a faire du cote de la fourmi. Ce qui est plus difficile a expliquer est la part active que prend d'apres Mueller le Cecropia peltata a la nutrition de l' +Azteca muelleri +par la production des corpuscules de Mueller. + + +Au point de vue biologique, on peut donc en somme diviser les +Azteca +en trois groupes assez naturels: - + + + + + +1 + + + +°. Truncicoles (Truncicola). - Ce sont les especes qui habitent indifferemment l'interieur des troncs d'un arbre quelconque plus ou moins excave, mort ou pourri, en y construisant ou non du carton: +instabilis +, +velox +, +delpini +, etc., en general poilues. + + +2 °. Cartonnieres (Chartifices). - Celles qui font des nids de carton a l'air libre, a la surface des troncs ou des branches d'arbres (peut-etre aussi sur les rochers): +chartifex +, +festai +, +lacrymosa +, +lallemandi +. + + +3 °. Adaptees (Adaptatae). - Celles qui sont adaptees (avec symbiose ou non) a un arbre (Cecropia) ou une plante speciale: +muelleri +, +constructor +, +alfaroi +, +coeruleipennis +, +angusticeps +, +depilis +, +schumanni +(adaptee aux vesicules des feuilles d'un Chrysobalanea), +virens +, +tonduzi +, +hypophylla +, +xanthochroa +. + + + + + +Les especes corticicoles ( +fasciata +, Em., +polymorpha +, For.) rentrent dans le groupe 1. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/57/DB/3757DB0A714010A06369048CD6021D71.xml b/data/37/57/DB/3757DB0A714010A06369048CD6021D71.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..feb2440eaac --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/57/DB/3757DB0A714010A06369048CD6021D71.xml @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Braconidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Mark R. + + + +Author + +Godfray, H. Charles J. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8151 +8151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 +1314-2828--8151 + + + + +Townesilitus bicolor (Wesmael, 1835) + + + + +Microctonus bicolor +Wesmael, 1835 + + +breviradialis +(Tobias, 1976, +Microctonus +) + + + +Distribution +England, Wales, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/58/6D/37586DEEEB22BF3BF1BDF15DA7BFF046.xml b/data/37/58/6D/37586DEEEB22BF3BF1BDF15DA7BFF046.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..53353dd0d7b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/58/6D/37586DEEEB22BF3BF1BDF15DA7BFF046.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +A first checklist of the Pteridophytes of Togo (West Africa) + + + +Author + +Abotsi, Komla Elikplim + + + +Author + +Kokou, Kouami + + + +Author + +Dubuisson, Jean-Yves + + + +Author + +Rouhan, Germinal + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2018 + +6 + + +24137 +24137 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e24137 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e24137 +1314-2828--24137 + + + + +Asplenium megalura Hieron. + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordNumber: AB0473; recordedBy: +Abotsi, K.E. +; Taxon: scientificName: Asplenium megalura Hieron.; namePublishedIn: Deutsche Zentralafr. Exp. 2: 17 (1910); kingdom: Plantae; phylum: Pteridophyta; class: Polypodiopsida; order: Polypodiales; family: Aspleniaceae; genus: Asplenium; specificEpithet: megalura; scientificNameAuthorship: Hieron.; Location: continent: Africa; country: +Togo +; countryCode: TG; locality: + +Danyi +Dzogbegan + +; verbatimElevation: +715 +; verbatimSRS: WGS84; decimalLatitude: +7.232035 +; decimalLongitude: +0.677682 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Abotsi, K.E. +; dateIdentified: 04-24-17; Event: eventDate: +04-24-17 +; habitat: Rainforest; Record Level: institutionID: Herbarium Togoense; collectionID: Abotsi, K.E.; institutionCode: +TOGO +; basisOfRecord: Preserved specimen + + + + +Ecological interactions + +Native status +Native + + + +Distribution +Zone 4 + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/58/C5/3758C547BB03E18206DD64DABA0D5043.xml b/data/37/58/C5/3758C547BB03E18206DD64DABA0D5043.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..15a5dded110 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/58/C5/3758C547BB03E18206DD64DABA0D5043.xml @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Rosaceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +234 +314 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Alchemilla conjuncta + +aggr. + + + + +Artbeschreibung: +10-30 cm +hoch, aufrecht, ohne niederliegende sterile Seitentriebe. + +Grundstaendige +Blaetter +7-9teilig + +(nie nur 5teilig). + +Teilblaetter +am Grund +/- verwachsen + +, unterseits dicht +silberglaenzend +behaart, oberseits matt oder schwach +glaenzend +, vorn +gezaehnt +. Die meisten +Blueten +ohne +Tragblaetter +. + +Bluetenstiele +1-6 mm +lang + +, die +endstaendigen +oft +laenger +, +Bluetenknaeuel +daher locker. + + + + +Bluetezeit +: 6-9 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz: Weiden, Felsen, Felsschutt, meist auf Kalk / montan-subalpin(-alpin) / A, M in +Alpennaehe +, J ( +noerdlich +bis SO) + + + + +Verbreitung global: Mittel- und +suedeuropaeisch + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl L--Salzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl T--
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +--
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Verwachsener Frauenmantel +, +Verwachsener Silbermantel +Nom +francais +: + +Alchemille +a +folioles +soudees + +Nome italiano: + +Alchemilla +a fogliole saldate + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/58/DF/3758DFD9E22D0E1826AA05493CCD0BCE.xml b/data/37/58/DF/3758DFD9E22D0E1826AA05493CCD0BCE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e5064fbebde --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/58/DF/3758DFD9E22D0E1826AA05493CCD0BCE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +Scarabaeinae dung beetles from Ecuador: a catalog, nomenclatural acts, and distribution records + + + +Author + +Chamorro, William + + + +Author + +Marin-Armijos, Diego + + + +Author + +senjo, Angelico + + + +Author + +Vaz-De-Mello, Fernando Z. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +826 + + +1 +343 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.826.26488 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.826.26488 +1313-2970-826-1 +B1550A3AE54744509A44BC4366D5E110 + + + + +Sulcophanaeus noctis (Bates, 1887) + + + + +Phanaeus noctis +Bates, 1887: 56 (original description. Type locality: Panama, Bugaba Volcan de Chiriqui. South America, Colombia). + + + +Remarks. + +This species was recorded for Ecuador by the following authors: +Gillet (1911a +: 85) cited as +Phanaeus noctis +Bates; +Blackwelder (1944 +: 210) cited as +Phanaeus noctis +Bates; +Vulcano and Pereira (1967 +: 575) listed characters in key, cited as +Phanaeus noctis +Bates, 1887; +Edmonds (2000 +: 27), distribution; +Carvajal et al. (2011 +: 320-321), list of species. + + +Arnaud (2002: 139) mentioned that +S. noctis +(Bates, 1887) was recorded in Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Panama. According to our data, there are no other records of this species in the collections listed. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/59/2B/37592B1D6F62EEB4D23F5D810B01BA40.xml b/data/37/59/2B/37592B1D6F62EEB4D23F5D810B01BA40.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d90ef77dcf8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/59/2B/37592B1D6F62EEB4D23F5D810B01BA40.xml @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ + + + +A synoptic review of the ants of California (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). + + + +Author + +Ward, P. S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2005 + +936 + + +1 +68 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/21008/21008.pdf + +journal article +21008 + + + + + + +Messor smithi (Cole +1963a) + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/59/31/3759312111F9FF164DD07DE95A96D650.xml b/data/37/59/31/3759312111F9FF164DD07DE95A96D650.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..25a714fe1d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/59/31/3759312111F9FF164DD07DE95A96D650.xml @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - aculeates (Apoidea, Chrysidoidea and Vespoidea) + + + +Author + +Else, George R. + + + +Author + +Bolton, Barry + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8050 +8050 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8050 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8050 +1314-2828-4-8050 + + + + +Ancistrocerus gazella (Panzer, 1798) + + + + +Vespa gazella +Panzer, 1798 + + +emarginata +(Fabricius, 1793, +Vespa +) preocc. + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/59/E5/3759E5DEDE7F59F28DF6906FED99A66B.xml b/data/37/59/E5/3759E5DEDE7F59F28DF6906FED99A66B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8b0d25c2230 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/59/E5/3759E5DEDE7F59F28DF6906FED99A66B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,431 @@ + + + +Three new species of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae) from Hunan, China + + + +Author + +Li, Song-Lin +0000-0002-1127-0781 +College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China + + + +Author + +Liu, Ping +0000-0002-4959-2735 +College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China + + + +Author + +Peng, Xian-Jin +0000-0002-2614-3910 +College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2024 + +2024-06-07 + + +1204 + + +301 +312 + + + +journal article +298202 +10.3897/zookeys.1204.122887 +8a2e1bc3-5cd2-4bc5-995d-490f957165a2 +E05D5A85-37DF-468C-B92D-EF5B5C8936C0 + + + + + +Yaginumaella curvata + +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 4 +, +5 +, +6 + + + + +Type material. + + + + +Holotype + +♂ +( +HNU-BMS- 1901 +), +China +, +Hunan Prov. +, +Chenzhou City +, +Guidong Co. +, +Bamian Mountain National Nature Reserve +, + +25.975914 ° N +, +113.708825 ° E + +, + +1001 m + +, + +15 Sept. 2019 + +, +Cheng Wang +, +Bo Lü +and +Xuan-Wei Zhou +leg. + +; + + +paratypes + +: +♀ +( +HNU-BMS- 2202 +), +China +, +Hunan Prov. +, +Chenzhou City +, +Guidong Co. +, +Bamian Mountain National Nature Reserve +, + +25.975568 ° N +, +113.705383 ° E + +, + +1143 m + +, + +19 Aug. 2022 + +, +Song-Lin Li +, +Peng Yong +, +Li-Fen Li +, +Yu-Chen Zhou +, +Zi-Yue Liu +leg. + +; + +2 ♀ +( +HNU-BMS- 2205 +), +China +, +Hunan Prov. +, +Chenzhou City +, +Guidong Co. +, +Bamian Mountain National Nature Reserve +, + +25.986542 ° N +, +113.705841 ° E + +, + +1250 m + +, + +22 Aug. 2022 + +, +Song-Lin Li +, +Peng Yong +, +Li-Fen Li +, +Yu-Chen Zhou +, +Zi-Yue Liu +leg. + + + + + +Etymology. + + +The specific epithet is derived from the Latin + +“ +curvata + +” (curved), referring to the curved retrolateral tibial apophysis, adjective. + + + + +Diagnosis. + + +The male of this new species is similar to that of + +Yaginumaella bulbosa +Peng, Tang & Li, 2008 + +( +Peng et al. 2008 +: figs 26–28) in habitus and the curved +RTA +, but can be distinguished by: 1) cymbium longer than wide (Fig. +4 A +), while wider than long in + +Y. bulbosa + +(fig. 27); 2) length of +RTA +is about 1 / 3 of the palpal bulb (Fig. +4 B +), while about 1 / 2 of the palpal bulb in + +Y. bulbosa + +(fig. 28); 3) +RTA +only extended to the basal 1 / 6 position of cymbium in retrolateral view (Fig. +4 B +), while to the basal 1 / 2 position of cymbium in retrolateral view in + +Y. bulbosa + +(fig. 28); and 4) embolus originates at about 7: 00 o’clock position (Fig. +4 A +), while originates at about 9: 00 o’clock position in + +Y. bulbosa + +(fig. 27). The female of this new species is similar to that of + +Yaginumaella lushiensis +Zhang & Zhu, 2007 + +( +Zhu and Zhang 2011 +: fig. 384 A, D, E) in the short and stout copulatory ducts and the shape of spermathecae, but can be distinguished by the following characters: 1) distance of copulatory openings as wide as the vulva (Fig. +4 C +), while about 1 / 3 width of the vulva in + +Y. lushiensis + +(fig. 384 D); 2) epigynal pockets located at the median portion of epigyne (Fig. +4 C +), while located on the anterior portion in + +Y. lushiensis + +(fig. 384 D); and 3) fertilisation duct about transverse (Fig. +4 D +), while oblique in + +Y. lushiensis + +(fig. 384 E). + + + + + + + +Yaginumaella curvata + +sp. nov. +A +left palp, ventral view +B +ditto, retrolateral view +C +epigyne, ventral view +D +vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm. + + + + + +Description. + + +Male +( +holotype +) (Fig. +5 A, B +). Total length 5.14; carapace 2.60 long, 2.06 wide; abdomen 2.52 long, 1.59 wide. Carapace brown, with three longitudinal yellow stripes on the median and lateral margins, eye field and lateral margins covered with white setae. Fovea longitudinal, cervical and radial grooves distinct. Eye sizes and interdistances: +AME +0.49, +ALE +0.28, +PME +0.08, +PLE +0.21, +AER +1.75, +PER +1.65, +EFL +0.78. Chelicerae light brown, promargin with two teeth, and retromargin with one tooth. Endites and labium light brown, distal end pale yellow. Sternum pale yellow. Legs yellow except for femora, patellae and tibiae of leg I brown. Measurements of legs: I 5.99 (1.76, 2.38, 1.17, 0.68), II 4.89 (1.59, 1.91, 0.67, 0.72), III 5.39 (1.70, 1.94, 1.14, 0.61), IV 5.50 (1.76, 1.79, 1.32, 0.63). Leg formula: 1432. Abdomen oval, dorsum with sparse long black hair, anterior margin black, the posterior median with two gray herringbone patterns and four chevrons; venter light yellow, with black maculation. + + + + + + + +Yaginumaella curvata + +sp. nov. +A +male holotype, habitus, dorsal view +B +ditto, ventral view +C +female paratype, habitus, dorsal view +D +ditto, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm. + + + +Palp (Fig. +4 A, B +). Embolus long and thin, originates at about 7: 00 o’clock position; tegular lobe folds to retrolateral side; retrolateral tibial apophysis curved towards dorsal side at right angle from the middle. + + +Female. +( +paratype +) (Fig. +5 C, D +). Total length 4.94; carapace 2.74 long, 2.04 wide; abdomen 2.54 long, 1.63 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: +AME +0.41, +ALE +0.27, +PME +0.11, +PLE +0.23, +AER +1.81, +PER +1.79, +EFL +0.72. Chelicerae promargin with two teeth, retromargin with one tooth. Legs pale yellow. Measurements of legs: I 4.79 (1.63, 1.80, 0.76, 0.60), II 4.44 (1.71, 1.49, 0.69, 0.55), III 5.49 (1.82, 1.94, 1.08, 0.65), IV 5.23 (1.63, 1.87, 1.03, 0.70). Leg formula: 3412. Abdomen oval, dorsum black, with symmetric lighter yellowish central area, posterior portion covered with dense black and white long hairs; venter light yellow, with three longitudinal black stripes. Color darker than that in male. + + +Epigyne (Fig. +4 C, D +). Epigynal window oval, located at anterior portion of epigyne. Copulatory openings slit-shaped, located at the lower lateral margin of the epigynal window. Copulatory ducts short and stout. Spermathecae tubular and intertwined. + + + + +Distribution. + + +Known only from the type locality (Fig. +6 +). + + + + + + +Collection localities of + +Thiania bamian + +sp. nov. +, + +Thiania flacata + +sp. nov. +and + +Yaginumaella curvata + +sp. nov. + + + + + +GenBank accession number. + + +Paratype +(( +HNU-BMS- 2205 +): +PP 786561 +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/59/F7/3759F7FE45DB5F3B9DB90DF1BD896EEC.xml b/data/37/59/F7/3759F7FE45DB5F3B9DB90DF1BD896EEC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7a17e9535b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/59/F7/3759F7FE45DB5F3B9DB90DF1BD896EEC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ + + + +DNA barcoding aids in generating a preliminary checklist of the lichens and allied fungi of Calvert Island, British Columbia: Results from the 2018 Hakai Terrestrial BioBlitz + + + +Author + +McMullin, Richard Troy +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-2891 +Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, K 1 P 6 P 4, Canada +tmcmullin@nature.ca + + + +Author + +Simon, Andrew D. F. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-8974 +School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, V 8 P 5 C 2, Canada + + + +Author + +Brodo, Irwin M. +Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, K 1 P 6 P 4, Canada + + + +Author + +Wickham, Sara B. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8155-5689 +Hakai Institute, PO Box 309, Heriot Bay, British Columbia, VOP 1 H 0, Canada + + + +Author + +Bell-Doyon, Philip +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8144-8613 +Department of Biology, Universite Laval, Quebec, Quebec, G 1 V 0 A 6, Canada + + + +Author + +Kuzmina, Maria +Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N 1 G 2 W 1, Canada + + + +Author + +Starzomski, Brian M. +School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, V 8 P 5 C 2, Canada + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2024 + +2024-02-28 + + +12 + + +120292 +120292 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e120292 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e120292 +1314-2828-12-e120292 +37948F4E7CD256228E539899FB043CE2 + + + + +Protomicarea limosa (Ach.) Hafellner + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +catalogNumber: BOLD CALV187-20; recordedBy: R.T. McMullin; otherCatalogNumbers: GenBank OQ843251; occurrenceID: +61DBD3B9-61DE-5799-84FC-6C3015D1A988 +; +Location: +locationID: X; decimalLatitude: +51.61977 +; decimalLongitude: +-127.93245 +; +Identification: +identificationRemarks: Figure 4D. TLC: no substance detected; +Event: +habitat: Bryicolous on rock; +Record Level: +institutionID: CANL; collectionID: McMullin 19698 + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5A/42/375A427F4BAC533D8D1E03018274B079.xml b/data/37/5A/42/375A427F4BAC533D8D1E03018274B079.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b1506bb8d11 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5A/42/375A427F4BAC533D8D1E03018274B079.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +Checklist of aquatic Diptera (Insecta) of Plitvice Lakes National Park, Croatia, a UNESCO world heritage site + + + +Author + +Ivkovic, Marija + + + +Author + +Doric, Valentina + + + +Author + +Baranov, Viktor + + + +Author + +Mihaljevic, Zlatko + + + +Author + +Kolcsar, Levente-Peter + + + +Author + +Kvifte, Gunnar Mikalsen + + + +Author + +Nerudova, Jana + + + +Author + +Pont, Adrian C. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +918 + + +99 +142 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.918.49648 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.918.49648 +1313-2970-918-99 +A8ACA00F1AEF41C4AE0E402C3E5A6A7B +B1E99D1C226850AA9F76EEB66ECEDCEB + + + + +Jungiella valachia (Vaillant, 1963) + + + +Literature reference. + +• spring of Bijela rijeka, Plitvice Lakes NP (1) ( +Kvifte et al. 2013 +, + +Ivkovic +et al. 2015 + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5A/9A/375A9A9211AF9B5EBE038080F2DFB9F2.xml b/data/37/5A/9A/375A9A9211AF9B5EBE038080F2DFB9F2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0284a395b1a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5A/9A/375A9A9211AF9B5EBE038080F2DFB9F2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Gryllus tataricus +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + + +G. L. thorace subcarinato: segmentis tribus, capite rotundato, maxillis concoloribus. +M. L. U. + + + + +Habitat in +Tataria. + + + + +Alae costa rubra a priori manifeste distinctus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5B/00/375B00A34716D8804CC53A68B9731722.xml b/data/37/5B/00/375B00A34716D8804CC53A68B9731722.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ad1fa9fd33e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5B/00/375B00A34716D8804CC53A68B9731722.xml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ + + + +Nematodes from terrestrial and freshwater habitats in the Arctic + + + +Author + +Holovachov, Oleksandr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1165 +1165 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1165 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1165 +1314-2828--1165 + + + + +Tobrilus brevisetosus (W. Schneider, 1925) + + + +Notes + +Taymyr and Severnaya Zemlya, Russia ( +Gagarin 2001b +); Novaya Zemlya and Vaigach island, Russia ( +Gagarin 1997a +, +Gagarin 2001b +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5B/1A/375B1ADAE84E5F83BA5E7A8AC1477AF9.xml b/data/37/5B/1A/375B1ADAE84E5F83BA5E7A8AC1477AF9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3d66d3f3b88 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5B/1A/375B1ADAE84E5F83BA5E7A8AC1477AF9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ + + + +Checklist of digeneans (Platyhelminthes, Trematoda, Digenea) of Georgia + + + +Author + +Arabuli, Lela +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9921-6343 +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia +lela.arabuli.1@iliauni.edu.ge + + + +Author + +Murvanidze, Lali +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia + + + +Author + +Faltynkova, Anna +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-5881 +Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic + + + +Author + +Mumladze, Levan +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-6973 +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2024 + +2024-01-08 + + +12 + + +110201 +110201 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e110201 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e110201 +1314-2828-12-e110201 +2E017986F1F55AB49BD4F0A41AB76F82 + + + + +Metorchis xanthosomus (Creplin, 1846) Braun, 1902 + + + + +Metorchis intermedius +Heinemann, 1937 + + + +Parasite of + +birds - +Anatidae +: + +Anas acuta + +, + +A. crecca + +, +A. plathyrynchos f. domestica +, + +Anser anser + +, + +Aythya fuligula + +. + + +Site of infection +: gallbladder, hepatic ducts. + + + +Distribution + +Occurring in Europe; +in Georgia +: EG: Marneuli; WG: Abasha - Tskhenistskali, Samtredia, Zugdidi reported by +Kurashvili (1957) +, +Kurashvili (1961a) +, +Kurashvili et al. (1976) +and +Kurashvili (1984b) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5B/64/375B6432FF9E3A1FFF20FD92FC44F850.xml b/data/37/5B/64/375B6432FF9E3A1FFF20FD92FC44F850.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f481daccffd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5B/64/375B6432FF9E3A1FFF20FD92FC44F850.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1059 @@ + + + +A new species of Eigenmannia Jordan and Evermann (Gymnotiformes: Sternopygidae) from the upper rio Paraguai basin + + + +Author + +Campos-Da-Paz, Ricardo + + + +Author + +Queiroz, Igor Raposo + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +4216 + + +1 + + +73 +84 + + + +journal article +37368 +10.5281/zenodo.229831 +40c4f13c-8cb8-4d87-84b5-627121c85664 +1175-5326 +229831 +E6C32C6B-DC12-43D2-872B-70924998287A + + + + + + + +Eigenmannia correntes + +, +new species + + + + +Figures 1–2 + + + + + + +Holotype +. + + +MNRJ +47046 + +, 113.0 mm +LEA +, +Brazil +, + +Mato +Grosso do Sul + +, Sonora, córrego +de Baixo +, left margin tributary of rio +Correntes +, at road MS-213, +17o42’46”S +54o21’25”W +, R. Campos-da-Paz, + +4 Oct 2003 + +. + + + +Paratypes. +All collected along with holotype. MNRJ 46334, 29, +2 c&s, 14.0–118.0 mm LEA. + + + + +Non-type +material. + +All +from +Brazil +. + +MNRJ +46335, 21 + +, 61.0–83.0 mm +LEA +, + +Mato Grosso +do Sul + +, +Sonora +, córrego +de Cima +, left margin tributary of rio +Correntes +, at road MS-213, +17o39’52”S +54o14’48”W +, R. Campos-da- +Paz +, + +4 Oct 2003 + + +; + + +MNRJ +46336, 10 + +, 44.0–69.0 mm +LEA +, +Mato Grosso +, +Itiquira +, stream at right margin of rio +Correntes +, near highway BR-163, +17o28’36”S +54o43’23”W +, R. +Campos-da-Paz +, + +5 Oct 2003 + + +. + + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Eigenmannia correntes + +, MNRJ 47046, holotype, 113.0 mm LEA, Brazil, Mato Grosso do Sul, Sonora, córrego de Baixo. Lateral view of body. Scale bar: 10 mm. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Distinguished from all congeners, except those species included in the + +Eigenmannia trilineata + +species-group, by the presence of a conspicuous superior midlateral stripe ( +Fig. 1 +; +vs +. absence). + +Eigenmannia correntes + +can be differentiated from all members of the + +Eigenmannia trilineata + +species-group, except + +E. vicentespelaea + +, + +E. waiwai + +and + +E +. +besouro + +, by the mouth subterminal ( +Fig. 2 +; +vs +. terminal in remaining species of the + +E. trilineata + +species-group). It differs from + +E. vicentespelaea + +by: 1) lower number of premaxillary teeth (17–20, in three irregular rows +vs +. 25–26, in four rows); 2) lower number of dentary teeth (16–18, in two irregular rows +vs +. 38–45, in three or four rows); 3) higher number of longitudinal series of scales above lateral line (11–12 +vs +. 7–8); 4) lower number of pectoral-fin rays (ii,12–13 +vs +. ii,15–17); 5) lower total number of anal-fin rays (143–164 +vs +. 169– 191); 6) larger body width (6.4–8.1% of LEA +vs. +3.5–5.8%); and 7) larger oral width (23.5–26.0% of HL +vs +. 9.5– 17.2%). It differs from + +E. waiwai + +by: 1) larger oral width (23.5–26.0% of HL +vs +. 9.5–14.6%); 2) longer snout (32.2–35.2% of HL +vs +. 23.8–31.5%); 3) smaller eye (orbital diameter 10.6–13.3% of HL +vs +. 22.6–28.8%);) greater postorbital distance (56.8–62.1% of HL +vs +. 43.9–55.4%); 5) smaller head depth at supraoccipital (63.7–70.0% of HL +vs +. 73.6–86.2%); 6) longer mouth (19.9–24.6% of HL +vs +. 12.1–17.7%); 7) lower number of premaxillary teeth (17–20, in three irregular rows +vs +. 35–40, in five rows); 8) lower number of dentary teeth (16–18, in two irregular rows +vs +. 37–38, in four rows); 9) higher number of longitudinal series of scales above lateral line (11–12 +vs +. 9–10); and 10) lower total number of anal-fin rays (143–164 +vs +. 167–195). Finally, it is distinguished from + +E. besouro + +by: 1) larger oral width (23.5–26.0% of HL +vs +. 9.5–19.1%); 2) longer snout (32.2–35.2% of HL +vs +. 23.7–31.9%); 3) larger eye (orbital diameter 10.6–13.3% of HL +vs +. 16.9–25.1%); 4) shorter postorbital length (56.8–62.1% of HL +vs +. 46.9–55.9%); 5) greater suborbital depth (25.2–32.3% of HL +vs +. 18.3–24.8%); and 6) higher number of longitudinal series of scales above lateral line (11–12 +vs +.7–10). + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Eigenmannia correntes + +, MNRJ 47046, holotype, 113.0 mm LEA. Head and anteriormost portion of body. Scale bar: 10 mm. Arrow indicates anus position. + + + + +Description. +Morphometric and meristic data of +holotype +and +paratypes +summarized in +Table 1 +. Body compressed, more markedly posterior to abdominal cavity and to posterior half of TL. Greatest body depth at abdominal region, near vertical through tip of pectoral fin. Dorsal profile of body nearly straight to gently convex anteriorly; ventral profile slightly convex. + +Head compressed, widest at opercular region and deepest at occiput. Dorsal profile of head convex from tip of snout to vertical through opercular opening; ventral profile of head slightly concave from tip of mandible to opercular opening. Snout elongate, subconical; eyes of moderate size, circular, covered with thin skin, laterally oriented on anterior third of head length. Mouth of moderate size and subterminal, upper jaw projected, mandible included, rictus near a vertical through posterior naris; teeth present on both jaws, premaxillary and dentary teeth similar in size on each bone. Anterior nares small, tubular, on anterior half of mouth length and close to tip of snout; posterior nares not tubular, elliptical, near a vertical through rictus, about one eye diameter from anterior eye margin. Opercular (branchial) opening of moderate size, immediately anterior to pectoral fin origin, with membranous margin; branchial membranes joined to isthmus. Anus and well-developed urogenital papilla adjacent, ventral to opercular region, with no apparent significant shifting anteriorly with age. Pectoral fin elongate, ellipsoid, with ii,12(9) or ii,13(1) [ii,12] (total pectoral-fin rays, 14–15 [14]). Scales cycloid, present over body posterior from head, including postcranial portion of body and mid-dorsal region, maximum number of scales above lateral line at mid-body 11(4) or 12(6) [11]. Lateral line scales usually larger than those immediately dorsal and ventral to that series, 100–116 [100] to vertical to posterior end of anal fin. Anal-fin origin slightly posterior from vertical through pectoral-fin origin; anterior unbranched anal-fin rays 11–16 [11], less developed and smaller than posterior branched ones; total anal-fin rays 143–164 [143] rays. Tail cylindrical, elongate, tapering to pointed posterior end. + + +TABLE 1 +. Morphometric and meristic data for + +Eigenmannia correntes + +, +new species +. See text for details. Legends: Min. = Minimum; Max. = Maximum; N = Number of specimens measured; SD = standard deviation. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
MeasurementsHolotypeParatypesMeanSDN
Min.—Max.
+Absolute values (mm) +
Total length (TL)160.0104.0–145.0--10
Length to end of anal fin (LEA)113.076.0–115.0--10
Head length (HL)16.711.4–15.5--10
+Percentage of LEA (%) +
Head length13.013.1–14.913.91.010
Snout-to-opercle length12.811.2–14.313.00.910
Preanal distance17.514.7–19.217.21.510
Prepectoral distance15.112.9–15.814.50.810
Snout-to-anus length7.77.0–8.27.50.410
Body depth at pectoral-fin tip15.412.1–16.214.71.310
Body depth at anal-fin origin14.011.0–15.113.21.110
Body width7.516.4–8.17.10.710
Anus to anal-fin origin distance10.77.0–11.69.71.410
Anal-fin length82.375.4–84.380.92.810
Pectoral-fin length8.87.5–8.88.40.410
Snout-to-occiput length11.79.5–12.611.50.910
Caudal-filament length41.522.8–38.932.35.610
Caudal filament width0.70.6–0.70.70.110
Caudal filament depth1.51.1–1.41.30.210
+Percentage of HL (%) +
Snout length33.632.2–35.233.80.810
Internasal distance10.89.3–11.910.30.710
Snout-to-posterior naris distance23.621.5–25.923.21.310
Posterior naris-to-orbit distance9.68.5–10.59.50.710
Internarial width15.813.6–18.815.61.510
Head width at opercle51.847.4–53.650.42.210
Head width at orbits41.636.1–42.340.22.110
Orbital diameter12.410.6–13.312.00.810
Postorbital distance58.256.8–62.158.91.310
Eye-to-opercle length47.644.5–48.446.41.210
Opercular opening25.821.0–25.023.01.510
Suborbital depth31.825.8–32.329.02.010
Interorbital distance25.925.2–30.128.01.710
Head depth at supraoccipital65.963.7–70.066.62.110
Head depth at orbits46.146.6–51.447.81.510
Mouth length24.619.9–23.821.91.510
Oral width23.723.5–26.024.71.010
+ + +Relevant osteological features of + +Eigenmannia correntes + +as follows: vomer arrow-shaped anteriorly; lateral ethmoids and nasals present; antorbital and infraorbitals 1–4 enlarged, partial cylinders, with laminar bony arches, fifth and sixth infraorbitals slender and tubular; antorbital 25–30% of total length of infraorbital bones 1+2; infraorbital bones 1+2 with enlarged posterodorsal expansion (depth of posterodorsal expansion [DPE] 40% of length of infraorbital bones 1+2 [LIB]); infraorbitals 3 and 4 closely associated; premaxilla somewhat circular, with 17–20 pointed conical teeth of similar size in three irregular rows (N=2); maxilla edentulous, slender and gently curved posteriorly, with well-developed sickle-shaped anterodorsal process (about 20% of total length of maxilla, equal to width of posterior nostril); dentary triangular, with 16–18 pointed conical teeth of similar size, vertically directed in two irregular rows (N=2); small triangular coronomeckelian bone associated to posterodorsal margin of Meckel’s cartilage, about 20% of Meckel’s cartilage length; endopterygoid with well-developed dorsally directed process; small, pointed, conical teeth located ventrally sometimes in two irregular rows at anterior margin of endopterygoid, 4–5 (smaller, regenerated, c&s specimen) and 8–9 (larger c&s specimen, 112.0 mm LEA); five small elongate basibranchials, the two posterior ones unossified; five hypobranchials, the two posterior ones unossified; epibranchials 1–5 ossified; lower pharyngeal tooth plate with 7–12 conical teeth (N=2); infrapharyngobranchials 1–4 ossified; upper pharyngeal tooth plate with 7 conical teeth (N=2); urohyal broad, with irregular arrow-shaped head and well-developed posterior laminar portion, slightly larger than longest branchiostegal ray; five branchiostegal rays, three anterior ones filamentous, two posterior ones triangular, laminar distally. Scapular foramen present. Three independent pectoral proximal radials, proximal three and four coossified. Fourteen precaudal vertebrae, 10 anterior and 4 transitional vertebrae (N=2); 60 total vertebrae up to the end of anal fin (n=1). Anal pterygiophores slender and thin. + + +Coloration in alcohol. +Background colour yellowish pale brown, darker dorsally, lighter ventrally below superior midlateral stripe. Dorsal region of head, opercle area and middorsum brown. Eyes dark. Four longitudinal dark stripes along body: lateral-line stripe, thin, extending from anteriormost perforated lateral-line scales to posterior region of caudal filament, darker and conspicuous posterior from abdominal region; superior midlateral stripe, thicker (2–3 scales deep anteriorly), dark and conspicuous, extending posteriorly from abdominal region;inferior midlateral stripe, thick, extending from postero-ventral region of abdominal region; anal-fin base stripe, moderately thick, extending along anal-fin base. Area between superior midlateral stripe and inferior midlateral stripe light. Pectoral and anal fins hyaline, with scattered chromatophores over rays, interradial membranes hyaline. Caudal filament uniform brown. + + + +FIGURE 3. +View of córrego de Baixo (downstream), left margin tributary of rio +Correntes +, at point where it crosses road MS- 213, Brazil, Mato Grosso do Sul, Sonora, 17o42’46”S, 54o21”25”W. Type locality of + +Eigenmannia correntes + +. + + + +Geographic distribution. + +Eigenmannia correntes + +is currently known only from three streams, all tributaries of the rio +Correntes +, a major tributary of the rio Piquiri system, upper rio +Paraguai +basin: córrego de Baixo (typelocality; +Fig. 3 +) and córrego de Cima (both left margin tributaries, municipality of Sonora, +Mato Grosso do Sul +state, +Brazil +); and another stream (not named, at the right margin of the rio +Correntes +, Itiquira, +Mato Grosso +, +Brazil +). To date, the only remaning valid species belonging to the + +Eigenmannia trilineata + +species-group recorded in the rio +Paraguai +basin is + +E. desantanai + +(see + +Peixoto +et al +., 2015 + +; +Fig. 4 +). + +Eigenmannia correntes + +is readily separated from + +E. desantanai + +, for instance, for its conspicuous subterminal mouth ( +vs +. terminal in this latter species), premaxilla with 17–20 teeth in three irregular rows ( +vs +. 24–25 teeth in four rows), endopterygoid with 4– 9 teeth in two irregular rows ( +vs +. 14–15 teeth in two rows), anterior vertebrae 10 ( +vs +. 9), transitional vertebrae 4 ( +vs +. 2–3), precaudal vertebrae 14 ( +vs +. 11–12), 143–164 anal-fin rays ( +vs +. 170–198), and oral width 23.5–26.0% of HL ( +vs +. 13.1–18.4%). + + + +FIGURE 4. +Map of South America showing approximate type-localities of species belonging to the + +Eigenmannia trilineata + +species-group. Circle: + +Eigenmannia correntes + +; squares: 1 = + +E. antonioi + +; 2 = + +E. besouro + +; 3 = + +E. desantanai + +; 4 = + +E. guairaca + +; 5 = + +E. matintapereira + +; 6 = + +E. microstoma + +; 7 = + +E. muirapinima + +; 8 = + +E. pavulagem + +; 9 = + +E. trilineata + +; 10 = + +E. vicentespelae + +; 11 = +E. waiwai +. + + + + +FIGURE 5. +Lateral view of dissected distended abdominal region of paratype of + +Eigenmannia correntes + +(MNRJ 46334, 76.0 mm LEA) showing translucent/whitish (diameter <1.0 mm) as well as mature oocytes (diameter>1.0 mm, dark yellow/orange) inside abdomen. Head to right. Scale bar: 5 mm. + + + +Specimens in museum and other institutional collections, usually referred to as + +E. virescens + +, are also frequently recorded from the rio +Paraguai +basin ( +e.g +., + +Britski +et al +., 1999 + +), but their actual taxonomic identity needs to be properly addressed. + + + + +Remarks. + +Eigenmannia + +is currently poorly defined within the +Sternopygidae +, and there is no objective evidence unequivocally demonstrating its monophyly (see “Introduction”, above). For this reason, + +E. correntes + +is herein referred to that genus on the basis of a combination of characters either plesiomorphic or of uncertain polarity ( +e.g +., + +Tagliacollo +et al +., 2016 + +): eyes covered by skin; scales present over entire postcranial portion of body; nasal capsule length equal to at least two diameters of the posterior nostril; teeth present posteriorly beyond the anterior portion of the dentary; teeth absent from oral valve; teeth present on endopterygoid; infraorbital bones 1+2 with enlarged posterodorsal expansion; 8) gill rakers short, unossified; and absence of any dark and clear alternating wide vertical bands on body. + + +Giora and Fialho (2009) +studied the reproductive biology of, + +E. trilineata + +, from southern +Brazil +, and their results showed a high frequency of mature females from October to February, indicated that the first maturation size estimated for females was +80.5 mm +TL, and that the species showed multiple spawining +type +. Some females of + +Eigenmannia correntes + +(individuals collected in + +October +2003 + +in the rio +Correntes +system,> +ca +. 80.0 mm TL), exhibited conspicuous distended bellies, with translucent/whitish (diameter <1.0 mm) as well as mature oocytes (diameter>1.0 mm, dark yellow/orange coloration), clearly visible inside their abdomen through transparency ( +Fig. 5 +) what, as with + +E. trilineata + +, suggests a multiple spawning +type +. +Kirschbaum (1979) +, for instance, also reported multiple spawning +type +regarding specimens identified by him as + +E. virescens + +. + + +Three specimens of + +Eigenmannia correntes + +(MNRJ 46335 [01, +ca +. 65.0 mm LEA, tail broken] and MNRJ 46336 [02, 40.0 mm and 63.0 mm LEA) had cysts containing parasites (probably metacercariae; M. M. Ishikawa and S. B. de Pádua, pers. comm.), apparently representing the first evidence of this kind of parasitism in the genus ( +Fig. 6 +). + + + + +FIGURE 6. +Lateral view of body of non-type specimen of + +Eigenmannia correntes + +(MNRJ 46336, 40.0 mm LEA) showing cysts (probably of metacercarie; specimen before it was dissected for removal of parasites). Scale bar: 5 mm. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet + +correntes + +refers to the rio +Correntes +, the main river at the rio Piquiri system, upper rio +Paraguai +basin, from where all specimens used in the original description were collected. A noun in apposition. + + + + + +Comparative material. + +Eigenmannia microstoma + +: +ZMUC +[“Jrn. 24”], 1, +syntype +, +Brazil +, +Minas Gerais +, +Lagoa Santa + +; + + +MNRJ +24494, 3 + +, +Brazil +, +Alagoas +, +Penedo + +; + + +MZUSP +22955, 2 + +, +Brazil +, +Minas Gerais +, +Três Marias +, +rio São Francisco + +; + + +MZUSP +24643, 1 + +c&s, +Brazil +, +Três Marias +, +Três Marias +dam; + +Eigenmannia trilineata + + +: + +MZUSP +22616.0, 1, +Argentina +, +Buenos Aires +, +Rio de La Plata +; + +Eigenmannia vicentespelaea + + +: + + +MZUSP +42605, 1 + +, +holotype +, +Brazil +, +Goiás +, +São Domingos +, +Caverna +(“ +cave +”) +São Vicente II +, rio +Tocantins +basin + +; MZUSP 47984, 1 paratype, collected along with holotype; + +Eigenmannia matintapereira + +: + + +MZUSP +29973, 1 + +, +paratype +, +Brazil +, +Amazonas +, +rio Arirará + +; + + +MZUSP +29974, 1 + +, +paratype +, +Brazil +, +Amazonas +, +rio Marauiá +, +rio Negro +basin + +; + + +MZUSP +29975, 3 + +, +Brazil +, +Amazonas +, +rio Negro + +; + + +MZUSP +29981, 1 + +, +Brazil +, +Amazonas +, +rio Negro + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFC1A60526EFCA68FB31FEF1.xml b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFC1A60526EFCA68FB31FEF1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..810f5770b6d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFC1A60526EFCA68FB31FEF1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,402 @@ + + + +New Neotropical species of Downeshelea Wirth and Grogan and redescription of D. multilineata (Lutz) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) + + + +Author + +Santarém, Maria Clara Alves + + + +Author + +Borkent, Art + + + +Author + +Spinelli, Gustavo + + + +Author + +Felippe-Bauer, Maria Luiza + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2018 + +J. Nat. Hist. + + +2018-03-07 + + +52 + + +9 - 10 + + +509 +540 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 + +journal article +10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 +1464-5262 +5178489 +9FC2A016-1295-4047-877E-BC9030BD2BD2 + + + + + + + +Downeshelea multilineata + +species group: new group + + + + +Abbreviated description +. + + + + +Small- to medium-sized species (male wing length +0.85–1.37 mm +, female wing length +0.92–1.30 mm +), brown in colouration. Male eyes narrowly separated by a distance shorter than one ommatidia or contiguous in lower area; female eyes contiguous. Male antenna pale, except base of flagellomere 1, distal portion of flagellomere 10 and flagellomeres 11–13 brown; female antenna brown, basal portion of flagellomeres 1–7 pale; flagellomeres 2–8 somewhat barrel-shaped, 9–13 cylindrical, elongate. Palpus brown, segment 3 swollen or slightly swollen on midportion, with broad, deep sensory pit. Male mandible unarmed, female mandible with 9–12 teeth. Legs brown or pale brown, hind leg darker (except in + +D. casimirensis + +), hind tibial comb with six spines; apical spines of male hind tarsomeres 2–4: 1–1–1; male claws about 0.35–0.45 length of their respective tarsomere 5; female hind leg claw 0.89–1.53 length of tarsomere 5. Wing hyaline, with dark bristles on costa; two distinctive black spots, one on r-m, other in r +3 +from apex of r +2 +to M +1 +; three distinctive greyish areas: first near apex of M +1 +, second sigmoid-shaped near apex of M +2 +extending to wing margin in m +2 +, third over CuA +2 +, also in CuA + +1 +in + +some species. Male tergite 9 gradually tapering distally, distal ½ with sclerotised band laterally; gonocoxite moderately stout; gonostylus nearly straight, proximal ½ slightly pilose; parameres fused on basal portion, each with trilobed basal arm, heavily sclerotised; stem stout, straight or sinuous; distal portion abruptly bent ventrally, directed anteromesally, tapering to pointed tip, overlapped in some species; aedeagus subtriangular to rectangular, posterior portion with mesal excavation. Female with spermathecae variable in size, with short sclerotised ducts, third rudimentary spermathecae generally present. + + + + + +Key to males of the + +Downeshelea multilineata + +species group + + + + + + +1. Legs brown or pale brown, without bands (although some with varying pigmentation); wing with three distinctive greyish areas (in addition to the two dark spots on r-m and in r +3 +from the apex of r +2 +to M +1 +) ( +Figure 1a +); parameres distal portion abruptly bent ventrally, directed anteromesally, tapering to pointed tip, 0.50–0.75 of total paramere length .................................................. + +multilineata + +species group.................................................. 2 + + + + +– Legs various; wing with variable distinctive greyish areas; parameres distal portion not as above ........................................................................................ other + +Downeshelea +species + + + + + + +2. Legs brown, hind femur brown; medium- to large-sized species; midtarsomere 1 with seven to eight ventral spines. Parameres with a short posteromedian projection on the medial fused portion................................................................................................................................ 3 + + +– Legs brown or pale brown, hind femur darker subapically; small- to medium-sized species; midtarsomere 1 with two to six ventral spines. Parameres without a posteromedian projection on the medial fused portion....................................................................... 4 + + + + + +3. Tergite 9 with short, broad apicolateral process; paramere stem sinuous on midportion, expanded subapically forming a broad lobe laterally directed; distal portion 0.55– 0.84 of total paramere length ( +Figure 8i +); aedeagus without elliptical sclerotised anterior areas, distal portion terminating in sclerotised non-serrate process ( +Figure 8h +) ..................................................................................................................................... + +D. eclectica + +sp. nov. + + + + +– Tergite 9 with long, slender apicolateral process; paramere stem sinuous, proximal 2/3 directed posterolaterally, distal 1/3 slender directed posteromesally; distal portion 0.50 of total paramere length ( +Figure 9i +); aedeagus with two elliptical sclerotised anterior areas; distal portion terminating in sclerotised serrate processes ( +Figure 9h +).................... ...................................................................................................................................... + +D. moravia + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +4. CuA +1 +pale; paramere distal portion short, not reaching the medial fused portion, 0.53– 0.62 of total paramere length ............................................................................................................ 5 + + + + +– CuA +1 +greyish; paramere distal portion elongate, reaching the medial fused portion, 0.62–0.80 of total paramere length .................................................................................................. 7 + + + + + +5. Legs pale brown, foretibia pale or darker apically; halter knob pale; aedeagus subtriangular, with or without sclerotised anteromesal areas, not reaching midlength when present; basal arch extending to 0.22–0.56 of total length....................................... 6 + + + +– Legs brown ( +Figure 7d +); halter knob brown; aedeagus rectangular, with two large elliptical sclerotised anteromesal areas reaching midlength; basal arch extending to 0.17 of total length ( +Figure 9f +)................................................................ + +D. marambaia + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +6. Hind tibia pale ( +Figure 2d +); gonostylus 0.81 length of gonocoxite ( +Figure 8c +); parameres stem straight, gradually swollen to apex; distal portion deeply curved ( +Figure 8e +); aedeagus with pair of submedian sclerotised stripes and oval areas, basal arch extending to 0.56 of total length ( +Figure 8d +).................................................... + +D. casimirensis + +sp. nov. + + + + +– Hind tibia darker apically and on proximal third ( +Figure 5c +); gonostylus 0.58–0.64 length of gonocoxite ( +Figure 9a +); parameres stem basolaterally expanded, more slender and convergent distally, distal portion nearly straight ( +Figure 9b +); aedeagus without sclerotised stripes and oval areas, basal arch extending to 0.22–0.28 of total length ( +Figure 9a +) .................................................................................................... + +D. jarina + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +7. Sternite 9 with large prominent convex median lobe ( +Figure 8a +); paramere stem straight, distal portion slightly curved ( +Figure 8b +); aedeagus subtriangular, with two elliptical sclerotised anterior areas ( +Figure 8a +) .............................................................. + +D. multilineata +(Lutz) + + + + +– Sternite 9 with moderately convex median lobe; paramere stem and distal portion various; aedeagus rectangular or subrectangular, without elliptical sclerotised anterior areas ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 + + + + + +8. Halter knob pale; midtibia paler basally ( +Figure 3c +); paramere stem broad, sinuous, expanded apicolaterally, distal portion gradually curved ( + +Figure +8g + +); aedeagus subrectangular, basal arch extending to 0.22–0.26 of total length ( +Figure 8f +).......................... ............................................................................................................................. + +D. costaricensis + +sp. nov. + + + + +– Halter knob brown; midtibia brown ( +Figure 6c +); paramere stem nearly straight basally, expanded distally in inner portion, distal portion anteromesally directed abruptly curved to tip ( +Figure 9d +); aedeagus rectangular, basal arch extending to 0.34–0.42 of total length ( +Figure 9c +)......................................... ......................................... + +D. litorale + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +Key to females of the + +Downeshelea multilineata + +species group + + + +Female members of the multilineata group can only be recognised as such if associated with males of the group. The females of + +D. moravia + +, + +D. marambaia + +and + +D. casimirensis + +are unknown. + + + + + +1. Legs pale brown; hind tibia darker apically and on proximal third..... ..... + +D. jarina + +sp. nov. + + + +– Legs brown; hind tibia dark brown.................................................................................................. 2 + + + + + +2. Halter pale; mandible with 10 teeth......................... ......................... + +D. costaricensis + +sp. nov. +Halter brown; mandible with 11–12 teeth.................................................................................... 3 + + + + + + +3.Midtibia paler basally ............................................ ............................................ + +D. multilineata +Lutz + + + + +– Midtibia brown ........................................................................................................................................... 4 + + + + + +4.Hind femur brown; midtarsomere 1 with six to nine ventral spines .................................. ..................................................................................................................................... + +D. eclectica + +sp. nov. + + + + +– Hind femur darker subapically; midtarsomere 1 with four to five ventral spines............. ......................................................................................................................................... + +D. litorale + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFC6A60727E8CD8CFE58F91A.xml b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFC6A60727E8CD8CFE58F91A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7d7cb3ba17 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFC6A60727E8CD8CFE58F91A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,462 @@ + + + +New Neotropical species of Downeshelea Wirth and Grogan and redescription of D. multilineata (Lutz) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) + + + +Author + +Santarém, Maria Clara Alves + + + +Author + +Borkent, Art + + + +Author + +Spinelli, Gustavo + + + +Author + +Felippe-Bauer, Maria Luiza + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2018 + +J. Nat. Hist. + + +2018-03-07 + + +52 + + +9 - 10 + + +509 +540 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 + +journal article +10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 +1464-5262 +5178489 +9FC2A016-1295-4047-877E-BC9030BD2BD2 + + + + + + +Downeshelea multilineata +(Lutz), 1914 + + + + + + +( +Figures 1a–i +, +8a–b +, +10 +) + + + + + + + +Palpomyia multilineata +Lutz 1914: 93 + + +(male; +Rio de Janeiro +, +Brazil +; fig. wing). + + + + + + +Monohelea multilineata +: +Macfie 1940: 137 + + +( +Guyana +record; misidentification) + +Johannsen 1943: 781 + +(combination); + +Lane 1945: 368 + +(redescription; fig. male genitalia; in part male specimen); + +Wirth 1953: 149 + +(notes; fig. male genitalia; in key; misidentification); + +Lane and Wirth 1964: 224 + +(distribution; fig. aedeagus, parameres; in key; misidentifi cation); + +Wirth 1974: 41 + +(distribution, +Guyana +record). + + + + + + +Monohelea +( +Allohelea +) +multilineata +: +Wilkening et al. 1985: 524 + + +( +Florida +records). + + + + + + +Downeshelea multilineata +: +Wirth and Grogan 1988: 52 + + +(combination); + +Borkent and Wirth 1997: 98 + +(in world catalogue); + +Borkent and Spinelli 2000: 47 + +(in Neotropical catalogue; distribution); + +Borkent and Spinelli 2007: 80 + +(in Neotropical catalogue; distribution); + +Borkent and Grogan2009: 20 + +(in Nearctic catalogue; distribution); + +Grogan et al. 2010: 35 + +(in +Florida +species list; distribution); + +Borkent 2016: 124 + +(in world catalogue); + +Santarém and Felippe-Bauer 2017: 16 + +(Brazilian distribution). + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Male. +The only species of + +Downeshelea + +in the Americas with the following combination of features: gonostylus 0.58–0.67 length of gonocoxite; parameres fused for 0.13–0.23 of total length; stem straight, distal portion slightly curved ( +Figure 8b +); aedeagus subtriangular, basal arch V-shaped, extending to 0.41–0.46 of total length with two elliptical sclerotised areas ( +Figure 8a +). + + +Female. +The only species of + +Downeshelea multilineata + +group in the Americas with medium-sized wing ( +1.12–1.17 mm +) ( +Figure 1d +); midtarsomere 1 with 5–6 ventral spines; hind tibia brown; two unequal spermathecae ( +Figure 1i +). + + + + +Description + + +Male. +Head +. Eyes separated by a distance shorter than one ommatidia; antennal ratio 0.91–1.06 (0.97, n = 9); palpal ratio 2.20–2.75 (2.53, n = 9) ( +Figure 1c +). + + +Thorax. +Brown, without definite pattern in slide-mounted specimens. Wing ( +Figure 1a +) + + +with greyish spot over CuA +1 +, CuA +2 +extending into cua +1 +, anal cell, reaching wing margin; 2 +nd +radial cell twice longer than 1 +st +; wing length 0.97–1.15 (1.05, n = 10) mm; breadth + +0.32–0.40 (0.36, n = 10) mm; costal ratio 0.71–0.77 (0.75, n = 10). Halter brown, distal + +portion of knob darker. Legs ( +Figure 1b +) brown, midtibia slightly paler basally, hind + +femur darker subapically. Fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal, one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with two basal, two apical, 2–5 other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, hind legs: 1–1–1, 2–2–2, 1–1–1; fore tarsal ratio 2.04–2.47 (2.26, n = 10), mid tarsal ratio 2.17–2.64 (2.43, n = 10), hind tarsal ratio 2.06–2.29 (2.21, n = 10); claws 0.33–0.54 (0.43, n = 11) length of their respective tarsomere 5. + + +Figure 1. + +Downeshelea multilineata +(Lutz) + +. Male: (a) wing; arrows: greyish spots; (b) fore, mid, hind legs (bottom to top); (c) head, anterior view. Female: (d) wing; (e) eye separation, anterior view; (f) antenna; (g) palpus; (h) fore, hind tarsomeres (left to right; from different specimens); (i) apex of female abdomen, ventral view. + + + +Abdomen. +Dark brown. Terminalia ( +Figure 8a +): tergite 9 with rounded apex, apicolateral process elongate, slender; sternite 9 nearly straight anteriorly, posterior margin with prominent convex median lobe bearing 3–4 long setae. Gonocoxite 1.90–2.40 (2.15, n = 10) times longer than basal width; gonostylus stout, 0.58–0.67 (0.63, n = 9) length of gonocoxite. Parameres ( +Figure 8b +) 0.96–1.21 (1.07, n = 10) times longer than aedeagus, fused for 0.13– 0.23 (0.19, n = 10) of total length; knob bulbous; stem straight, apex slightly expanded laterally in some specimens; distal portion slightly curved, 0.67–0.75 (0.71, n = 8) of total length. Aedeagus subtriangular, heavily sclerotised laterally, basal arch V-shaped, extending to 0.41–0.46 (0.43, n = 9) of total length with two elliptical, sclerotised anterior areas; posterior portion with deep mesal excavation terminating in two pointed serrate processes. + + +Female. +Similar to male with usual sexual differences; eyes as in +Figure 1e +, antennal ratio 1.02 (n = 1) ( +Figure 1f +); palpus as in + +Figure +1g + +, palpal ratio 2.20 (n = 1); mandible with 11 teeth. Wing as in +Figure 1d +; wing length 1.12–1.17 (1.15, n = 5) mm; breadth 0.45–0.50 (0.48, n = 5) mm; costal ratio 0.77–0.81 (0.78, n = 5). Fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal, one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with two basal, two apical, 5–6 other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, hind legs: 2–2–2, 2–2–1, 1–1–2; fore tarsal ratio 2.38–2.47 (2.42, n = 2), mid tarsal ratio 2.38–2.76 (2.56, n = 3), hind tarsal ratio 2.34– 2.44 (2.39, n = 4); fore leg claws 0.61–0.72 (0.67, n = 2) length of their tarsomere 5; mid leg claws missing; hind leg claw 1.18–1.22 (1.20, n = 2) as long as tarsomere 5 ( +Figure 1h +). Abdomen with genital sclerite not visible in slide-mounted specimen. Two unequal spermathecae ( +Figure 1i +), measuring 48–58 (51, n = 4) by 45 (n = 1) µm and 38–48 (44, n = 4) by 33–40 (36, n = 2) µm. Third rudimentary spermatheca not visible. + + +Specimens examined + + +Neotype +male adult, labeled ‘ + +Neotype + +Downeshelea multilineata +(Lutz) + +, +BRAZIL +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +Jacarepaguá +, + +May 1977 + +, +Paiva +& +Pereira +cols.’ ( +CCER +) + +. + +Other specimens labeled as follows: +1 male +, same data as neotype except + +July 1972 + +, +Tavares +& +Souza +cols. ( +CCER +) + +; + +2 males +, +5 females +, same data except +Maricá +, + +06 February 1990 + +, FEEMA team cols. ( +CCER +) + +; + +2 males +labeled ‘ + +Downeshelea multilineata +(Lutz) + +, +BRAZIL +, +Bahia +, +Itajuipe +, +Fazenda Almirante +, + +28 October 1988 + +, +emergence trap +, J + +.A +. Winder col + +.’ ( +USNM +) ( +NEW +RECORD); +5 males +same data except + +16 December 1988 + +; + +02 June 1989 + +; + +05 January 1990 + +; + +24 February 1992 + +; + +27 July 1992 + +(4 +USNM +, 1 +CCER +) + +. + + + + +Distribution and bionomics + + +This species is found in the +USA +( +Florida +), +Guyana +(?) and +Brazil +(Bahia, +Rio de Janeiro +) ( +Figure 10 +). It has been found in coastal environments in the +USA +and forested areas in +Brazil +( +Rio de Janeiro +). +Wirth (1991 +, +1992 +)) and +Ronderos and Spinelli (1999) +indicated that the collections made by J.A. Winder in Fazenda Almirante, Itajuipe, Bahia, +Brazil +, were from cocoa plantations. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFC9A60D27F4C8F7FEF9FB96.xml b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFC9A60D27F4C8F7FEF9FB96.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2de6d183a39 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFC9A60D27F4C8F7FEF9FB96.xml @@ -0,0 +1,557 @@ + + + +New Neotropical species of Downeshelea Wirth and Grogan and redescription of D. multilineata (Lutz) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) + + + +Author + +Santarém, Maria Clara Alves + + + +Author + +Borkent, Art + + + +Author + +Spinelli, Gustavo + + + +Author + +Felippe-Bauer, Maria Luiza + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2018 + +J. Nat. Hist. + + +2018-03-07 + + +52 + + +9 - 10 + + +509 +540 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 + +journal article +10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 +1464-5262 +5178489 +9FC2A016-1295-4047-877E-BC9030BD2BD2 + + + + + + +Downeshelea costaricensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + +( +Figures 3a–h +, +8f–g +, +10 +) + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Male. +The only species of + +Downeshelea + +in the Americas with the following combination of features: gonostylus 0.58–0.66 length of gonocoxite; parameres fused for 0.29–0.34 of total length; stem broad, sinuous, expanded apicolaterally, distal portion slightly curved ( + +Figure +8g + +); aedeagus subrectangular, hyaline on midportion, basal arch U-shaped, extending to 0.22–0.26 of total length ( +Figure 8f +). + + +Female. +The only species of + +Downeshelea multilineata + +group in the Americas with medium-sized wing ( +1.02–1.15 mm +) ( +Figure 3d +); midtarsomere 1 with 4–5 ventral spines; hind tibia uniformly brown; two subequal spermathecae ( +Figure 3h +). + + + + +Figure 3. + +Downeshelea costaricensis + +sp. nov. +Male: (a) wing; (b) head, anterior view; (c) fore, mid, hind legs (left to right). Female: (d) wing; (e) palpus; (f) fore, mid, hind tarsomeres (bottom to top); (g) head, anterior view; (h) apex of female abdomen, ventral view. + + + + +Description + + +Male. +Head +. Eyes slightly contiguous in lower area, antennal ratio 0.90–0.99 (0.95, n = 10); palpal ratio 1.83–2.80 (2.31, n = 10) ( +Figure 3b +). + + +Thorax. +Brown, without definite pattern in slide-mounted specimens. Wing ( +Figure 3a +) with greyish spot over CuA +1 +, CuA +2 +extending into cua +1 +, anal cell, reaching wing margin; 2 +nd +radial cell 2.3 times longer than 1 +st +; wing length 0.95–1.10 (1.06, n = 10) mm; breadth 0.35–0.40 (0.37, n = 10) mm; costal ratio 0.68–0.77 (0.74, n = 10). Halter pale with distal portion of knob darker. Legs ( +Figure 3c +) brown, fore-, mid- tibiae slightly paler on basal portion, hind femur darker on distal third. Fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal, one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with two basal, two apical, 4–5 other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, hind legs: 1–1–1, 2–2–2, 1–1–1; fore tarsal ratio 2.15–2.40 (2.27, n = 10), mid tarsal ratio 2.33–2.74 (2.55, n = 10), hind tarsal ratio 2.00– 2.17 (2.06, n = 10); claws 0.33–0.46 (0.40, n = 10) length of their respective tarsomere 5. + + +Abdomen. +Dark brown. Terminalia ( +Figure 8f +): tergite 9 with quadrate apex, apicolateral process elongate, slender; sternite 9 straight anteriorly, posterior margin with moderately convex median lobe bearing 4–5 long setae. Gonocoxite 1.71–2.50 (2.27, n = 10) times longer than basal width; gonostylus 0.58–0.66 (0.62, n = 10) length of gonocoxite. Parameres ( + +Figure +8g + +) 0.93–1.05 (0.97, n = 10) times longer than aedeagus, fused for 0.29–0.34 (0.30, n = 10) of total length; knob bulbous; stem broad, sinuous, expanded apicolaterally; distal portion slightly curved, 0.66–0.80 (0.74, n = 10) of total length. Aedeagus subrectangular, strongly sclerotised, hyaline only on midportion, basal arch U-shaped, extending to 0.22–0.26 (0.24, n = 10) of total length; distal portion with deep mesal excavation terminating in two strong pointed, serrate processes. + + +Female. +Similar to male with usual sexual differences; antennal ratio 0.97–1.12 (1.04, n = 8) ( + +Figure +3g + +); palpus as in +Figure 3e +, palpal ratio 1.83–2.40 (2.03, n = 8); mandible with 10 teeth. Wing as in +Figure 3d +; wing length 1.02–1.15 (1.09, n = 8) mm; breadth 0.40–0.47 (0.43, n = 8) mm; costal ratio 0.78–0.82 (0.80, n = 8). Fore, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal and one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with two basal, two apical, 4–5 other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, hind legs: 1–1–1, 2–2–1, 1–1–2; fore tarsal ratio 2.18–2.52 (2.35, n = 8), mid tarsal ratio 2.40–2.90 (2.65, n = 8), hind tarsal ratio 2.13–2.44 (2.22, n = 8); fore-, mid- leg claws 0.50–0.75 (0.63, n = 8) length of their respective tarsomeres 5; hind leg claw about 0.89–1.20 (1.07, n = 8) as long as tarsomere 5 ( +Figure 3f +). Abdomen with genital sclerite elongated, tapering to rounded tip. Two subequal spermathecae ( +Figure 3h +), measuring 45–55 (50, n = 7) by 40–42.5 (42, n = 5) µm and 43–50 (48, n = 7) by 35–45 (40, n = 6) µm. Third rudimentary spermatheca of nearly 7.5 µm. + + +Specimens examined + + +Holotype +male adult, labeled ‘ + +Holotype + +Downeshelea costaricensis +Santarém, Borkent, Spinelli and Felippe-Bauer + +, +COSTA RICA +, +Guanacaste +, +Nosara, R. +Privada Nosara, +Estación +, + +5m + +, + +15 June 2004 + +, +D. Briceno +col, red de barrido. LN217060 352800 #77328’ ( +MNCR +); +allotype +female adult, labeled + +‘ + +Allotype + +Downeshelea costaricensis +Santarém, Borkent, Spinelli and Felippe-Bauer + +, +COSTA RICA +, +Guanacaste +, +Nandayure +, Manglar Jabilla. 05m. + +23 June 2004 + +, +D. Briceno +, +M. Moraga +cols, +Red Noyes. +LN198600 394500 #77424’ ( +MNCR +) + +. + +Paratypes +labeled as follows: +4 males +, +4 females +, same data as holotype ( +1 male +, +1 female +CCER +; +2 males +, +2 females +MNCR; +1 male +, +1 female +CNCI +); +2 males +, +4 females +, same data except ‘ +Río Nosara’ +( +MNCR +); +1 male +, +5 females +, same data except ‘ +Red Noyes’ +( +MNCR +); +7 females +, same data except ‘ +Desembocadura Rio Nosara +, +Red +de golpe, Y + +. + +Cardenas. +’ ( +MNCR +) + +; + +2 males +, same data except ‘ + +13–17 June 2004 + +, +Malaise, B + +. Gamboa, D. Briceno, M. Moraga, Y. + +Cardenas’ +( +MNCR +); +5 females +, same data as allotype (3 +MNCR +, 2 +CNCI +); +1 female +, same data except ‘ + +19–24 June 2004 + +, +Malaise +, +Porras +, +Gamboa +, +Briceno +, +Moraga +, +Cardenas’ +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, ‘ +Guanacaste +, +Refugio Vida Silvestre Ostional +, +Playa Ostional +, + +5m + +, + +13 June 2004 + +, +light trap +, +Gamboa, D + +. Briceno, M. Moraga, Y. + +Cardenas’ +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, ‘ +Limón +, +Parque Nacional Cahuita +, +Sector Puerto Vargas +, frente a casa administrativa, + +5m + +, + +17 May- 18 June 2002 + +, +Malaise, E + +. + +Rojas’ +( +MNCR +); +2 males +, +1 female +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, +Camaronal +, +Puesto +MINAE, + +5m + +, + +19–24 June 2004 + +, +Malaise +, +Cardenas +, +Gamboa +, +Porras +, +Briceno +, +Moraga’ +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, +Tarcoles +, + +01 July 1993 + +, A + + +. +Borkent +col + + +.’ ( +CNCI +); +1 male +, same data except ‘ + +2 km +Tivives + +, + +24 August 1993 + +’ ( +CNCI +); +2 males +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, +Parque Nacional Manuel Antonio +, + +17 July 1993 + +, A + +. + +Borkent’ +( +CNCI +); +1 male +, +1 female +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, +Golfito +, +Mano +bonito, mangrove, + +50–100m + +, + +22–29 April 2004 + +, +Malaise +, +Porras +, +Gamboa +, +Briceno +, +Moraga’ +( +CCER +) + +. + + + + +Distribution and bionomics + + + +This species is restricted to +Costa Rica +( +Guanacaste +, +Limón +and +Puntarenas +provinces) ( +Figure 10 +) + +. + +It +has been found in coastal and mangrove areas in +Costa Rica +from + +5 m + +to + +100 m +above sea level + + +. + + + + +Etymology + + +This species is named after +Costa Rica +, the country from which the described specimens were collected. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFCAA60A27F1CD56FE8CFB0A.xml b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFCAA60A27F1CD56FE8CFB0A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7181406ae6f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFCAA60A27F1CD56FE8CFB0A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@ + + + +New Neotropical species of Downeshelea Wirth and Grogan and redescription of D. multilineata (Lutz) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) + + + +Author + +Santarém, Maria Clara Alves + + + +Author + +Borkent, Art + + + +Author + +Spinelli, Gustavo + + + +Author + +Felippe-Bauer, Maria Luiza + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2018 + +J. Nat. Hist. + + +2018-03-07 + + +52 + + +9 - 10 + + +509 +540 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 + +journal article +10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 +1464-5262 +5178489 +9FC2A016-1295-4047-877E-BC9030BD2BD2 + + + + + + +Downeshelea casimirensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + +( +Figures 2a–d +, +8c–e +, +10 +) + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Male. +The only species of + +Downeshelea + +in the Americas with the following combination of features: gonostylus 0.81 length of gonocoxite; parameres fused for 0.19 of total length; stem straight, gradually swollen to apex; distal portion strongly curved ( +Figure 8e +); aedeagus subtriangular, heavily sclerotised laterally on proximal 2/3, with a pair of submedian, longitudinal sclerotised stripes and oval areas, basal arch V-shaped, extending to 0.56 of total length ( +Figure 8d +). + + +Female. +Unknown. + + + + +Description + + +Male. +Head +. Eyes slightly contiguous in lower area; antennal ratio 0.91 ( +Figure 2c +); palpal ratio 2.0 ( +Figure 2b +). + + +Thorax. +Brown, without definite pattern in slide-mounted specimens. Wing ( +Figure 2a +) with greyish spot over CuA +2 +extending into cua +1 +, anal cell, reaching wing margin; 2 +nd +radial cell twice longer than 1 +st +; wing length +0.85 mm +; breadth +0.35 mm +; costal ratio 0.70. Halter pale brown. Legs ( +Figure 2d +) pale brown, hind femur slightly darker subapically. Fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal, one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with two basal, two apical, four other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, hind legs: 1–1–1; 2–2–1; 1–1–1; fore tarsal ratio 2.31, mid tarsal ratio 2.45, hind tarsal ratio 2.14; claws 0.35 length of their respective tarsomere 5. + + + +Figure 2. + +Downeshelea casimirensis + +sp. nov. +, male. (a) Wing; (b) eye separation, anterior view; (c) head, anterior view; (d) fore, mid, hind legs (top to bottom). + + + +Abdomen. +Dark brown. Terminalia ( +Figure 8c +): tergite 9 with quadrate apex, apicolateral process elongate, slender; sternite 9 slightly concave anteriorly, posterior margin with large convex median lobe with blunt tip bearing 3 long setae. Gonocoxite 2.41 times longer than basal width; gonostylus long, 0.81 length of gonocoxite. Parameres ( +Figure 8e +) 1.10 times longer than aedeagus, fused for 0.19 of total length; knob flattened; stem straight, gradually swollen to apex; distal portion strongly curved, 0.53 of total length. Aedeagus ( +Figure 8d +) subtriangular, heavily sclerotised laterally on proximal 2/3, basal arch V-shaped, extending to 0.56 of total length with pair of submedian, longitudinal sclerotised stripes and oval areas; distal portion with a deep mesal excavation terminating in two short, slender, sclerotised, slightly serrate processes with pointed tip. + + +Female. +Unknown. + + +Specimens examined + + +Holotype +male adult, labeled ‘ +Holotype + +Downeshelea casimirensis +Santarém, Borkent, Spinelli and Felippe-Bauer + +, +BRAZIL +, +Rio de Janeiro +, Casimiro de Abreu, Union Biological Reserve ( +22° 25′ 35″ S +, +42° 2′ 4″ W +), +28 April-17 May 2013 +, Malaise, Biota +Diptera Fluminense +team cols.’ (CCER). + + + + +Distribution and bionomics + + +This species is restricted to forests in the Brazilian State of +Rio de Janeiro +(Casimiro de Abreu municipality) ( +Figure 10 +). + + + + +Etymology + + + +This species is named after the +type +locality at + +Casimiro +de Abreu + +, municipality of +Rio de Janeiro State + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFCEA612279BC86AFC18FD37.xml b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFCEA612279BC86AFC18FD37.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..14d95b51270 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFCEA612279BC86AFC18FD37.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1740 @@ + + + +New Neotropical species of Downeshelea Wirth and Grogan and redescription of D. multilineata (Lutz) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) + + + +Author + +Santarém, Maria Clara Alves + + + +Author + +Borkent, Art + + + +Author + +Spinelli, Gustavo + + + +Author + +Felippe-Bauer, Maria Luiza + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2018 + +J. Nat. Hist. + + +2018-03-07 + + +52 + + +9 - 10 + + +509 +540 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 + +journal article +10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 +1464-5262 +5178489 +9FC2A016-1295-4047-877E-BC9030BD2BD2 + + + + + + +Downeshelea eclectica + +sp. nov. + + + + + +( +Figures 4a–h +, +8h–i +, +10 +) + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Male. +The only species of + +Downeshelea + +in the Americas with the following combination of features: gonostylus 0.55–0.68 length of gonocoxite; parameres fused for 0.21–0.35 of total length, midportion of stem sinuous, expanded subapically, distal portion slightly curved ( +Figure 8i +); aedeagus subtriangular, basal arch U-shaped, extending to 0.28–0.38 of total length ( +Figure 8h +). + + +Female. +The only species of the + +Downeshelea multilineata + +group in the Americas with medium-sized wing ( +1.02–1.30 mm +) ( +Figure 4d +); midtarsomere 1 with 6–9 ventral spines; hind tibia brown; two slightly unequal spermathecae ( +Figure 4h +). + + + + +Description + + +Male. +Head +. Eyes slightly contiguous in lower area; antennal ratio 0.90–1.08 (0.98, n = 32); palpal ratio 2.00–2.50 (2.14, n = 32) ( +Figure 4b +). + + + +Figure 4. + +Downeshelea eclectica + +sp. nov. +Male: (a) wing; (b) head, anterior view; (c) fore, mid, hind legs (left to right). Female: (d) wing; (e) head, anterior view; (f) palpus; (g) fore, mid, hind tarsomeres (left to right); (h) apex of female abdomen, ventral view. + + + +Thorax. +Brown, without definite pattern in slide-mounted specimens. Wing ( +Figure 4a +) with greyish spot over CuA +1 +, CuA +2 +extending into cua +1 +, anal cell, reaching wing margin; 2 +nd +radial cell twice longer than 1 +st +; wing length 0.97–1.37 (1.05, n = 33) mm; breadth 0.32–0.47 (0.37, n = 33) mm; costal ratio 0.73–0.80 (0.78, n = 33). Halter brown, distal portion of knob darker. Legs ( +Figure 4c +) brown. Fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal, one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with two basal, two apical, 7–8 other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, hind legs: 2–2–2, 2–2–2, 1–1–1; fore tarsal ratio 2.28–2.64 (2.51, n = 31), mid tarsal ratio 2.31–2.68 (2.56, n = 30), hind tarsal ratio 2.19–2.55 (2.31, n = 33); claws 0.33–0.50 (0.42, n = 32) length of their respective tarsomeres 5. + + +Abdomen. +Dark brown. Terminalia ( +Figure 8h +): tergite 9 with quadrate apex, apicolateral process short, broad; sternite 9 straight anteriorly, posterior margin with large, greatly convex median lobe bearing 2–4 long setae. Gonocoxite 2.30–2.69 (2.45, n = 31) times longer than basal width; gonostylus 0.55–0.68 (0.60, n = 32) length of gonocoxite, with setae on apex and ventral portion. Parameres ( +Figure 8i +) 0.79–0.98(0.90, n = 31) times longer than aedeagus, fused for 0.21–0.35 (0.26, n = 29) of total length, a short posteromedian projection on the medial fused portion of the parameres in some specimens; knob stout, bulbous; stem sinuous on midportion, expanded subapically forming a broad lobe laterally directed; distal portion slightly curved, 0.55–0.84 (0.66, n = 31) of total length. Aedeagus subtriangular, basal arch U-shaped, extending to 0.28– 0.38 (0.34, n = 29) of total length; distal portion with heavily sclerotised margins, narrow, rounded, mesal excavation terminating in two short, heavily sclerotised processes. + + +Female. +Similar to male with usual sexual differences; antennal ratio 0.97–1.10 (1.01, n = 31) ( +Figure 4e +); palpus as in +Figure 4f +, palpal ratio 1.80–2.40 (2.07, n = 33); mandible with 11–12 teeth. Wing as in +Figure 4d +; wing length 1.02–1.30 (1.13, n = 33) mm; breadth 0.42–0.52 (0.47, n = 33) mm; costal ratio 0.78–0.83 (0.80, n = 33). Fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal and one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with two basal, two apical, 6–9 other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, hind legs: 2–2–2, 2–2–2, 1–1–2; fore tarsal ratio 2.27–2.79 (2.56, n = 33), mid tarsal ratio 2.37–2.79 (2.62, n = 33), hind tarsal ratio 2.35–2.76 (2.53, n = 33); fore-, mid- leg claws 0.54–0.81 (0.68, n = 33) length of their respective tarsomeres 5; hind leg claw 1.15–1.53 (1.31, n = 32) as long as tarsomere 5 ( + +Figure +4g + +). Abdomen with genital sclerite triangular. Two slightly unequal spermathecae ( +Figure 4h +), measuring 48–68 (58, n = 31) by 40–55 (50, n = 27) µm and 43–58 (50, n = 29) by 40–50 (45, n = 26) µm. Third rudimentary spermatheca inflated in some specimens to nearly 7.5 µm (not illustrated). + + +Specimens examined + + +Holotype +male adult, labeled ‘ + +Holotype + +Downeshelea eclectica +Santarém, Borkent, Spinelli and Felippe-Bauer + +, +COSTA RICA +, +Puntarenas +, + +Refugio Vida Silvestre +Río Piro + +, + +1000m + +Estación Tuva +, + +180m + +, + +14–21 September 2004 + +, +Gamboa +, +Briceno +, +Moraga +, Cardenas. Malaise. LS276000 525500 #53265’ ( +MNCR +); +allotype +female adult, labeled + +‘ + +Allotype + +Downeshelea eclectica +Santarém, Borkent, Spinelli + +and Felippe-Bauer’ same data as holotype ( +MNCR +) + +. + +Paratypes +labeled as follows: +2 males +, +5 females +, same data as holotype ( +1 male +CCER +; +1 male +, +5 females +MNCR +); +1 male +, +3 females +, same data except ‘ + +1500m +Estación Tuva’ + +( +1 female +CCER +; +1 male +, +2 females +CNCI +); +2 females +, same data except ‘ +Finca Catalino +, 200m’ ( +MNCR +); +6 females +, same data except ‘100m’ ( +MNCR +); +1 male +, same data except ‘ + +200m + +, + +16 September 2004 + +’ ( +MNCR +); +1 male +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, +Golfito +, +Parque Nacional Corcovado +, +Estación Agujas +, + +250–350m + +, + +15 June–15July 1999 + +, +Malaise +, J + +. + +Azofeifa Zuniga’ +( +MNCR +); +1 male +, same data except + +15 September –15 October 1999 + +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except + +15 October–15 November 1999 + +( +MNCR +); +1 male +, same data except ‘ + +300m + +, + +22 December 2000 + +– + +09 January 2001 + +’ ( +CNCI +); +5 males +, +4 females +, same data except ‘ +Sendero La Bonanza +, + +495m + +, + +15 June–15 July 1999 + +’ ( +1 male +, +1 female +CCER +; +2 males +, +2 females +MNCR; +2 males +, +1 female +CNCI +); +4 females +, +3 males +, same data except + +15 July–15 August 1999 + +( +2 males +, +2 females +MNCR +; +2 males +, +1 female +CNCI +); +3 males +, +3 females +, same data except + +15 August–15 September 1999 + +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except + +15 September –15 October 1999 + +( +MNCR +); +4 males +, +8 females +, same data except ‘ +Cerro Rincón +, + +745m + +, + +1August–25 September 2002 + +’ ( +MNCR +); +2 males +, +6 females +, same data except + +15 June–15 July 1999 + +( +MNCR +); +2 males +, +2 females +, same data except + +15 July–15 August 1999 + +( +MNCR +); +2 females +, same data except + +15 September–15 October 1999 + +( +CNCI +); +3 males +, +4 females +, same data except + +11 September–01 October 2002 + +( +MNCR +); +4 males +, +5 females +, same data except + +2 June–31 July 2002 + +( +2 males +, +2 females +MNCR +; +2 males +, +3 female +CNCI +); +2 males +, +9 females +, same data except, ‘ + +600–745m + +, + +15 August–15 September 1999 + +’ ( +MNCR +); +1 male +, same data except ‘ + +600–700m + +, + +28 July 2001 + +, manual, K + +. + +Caballero’ +( +MNCR +); +1 male +, same data except ‘ +La +triguilla, + +600m + +, + +11 September–31 October 2002 + +, +Malaise, J + +. + +Azofeifa Zuniga’ +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except + +24 June–31 July 2002 + +( +MNCR +); +4 males +, +5 females +, same data except ‘ +Sendero Las Quebraditas +, + +640m + +, + +15 September–15 October 1999 + +, CD5101’( +CNCI +); +2 males +, +3 females +, same data except + +15 October–15 November 1999 + +( +MNCR +); +1 male +, +4 females +, same data except, + +782m + +, + +15 July– 15 August 2000 + +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except + +20 December 2000 + +– + +20 January 2001 + +( +MNCR +); +4 females +, same data except ‘ +Los Charcos’ +, + +600–745m + +, + +15 June–15 July 1999 + +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except ‘ +Estación +Los Patos, +Senderos +a +Sirena’ +, + +70m + +, + +10 November–20 December 2000 + +( +MNCR +); +3 females +, same data except + +25 December 2000 + +– + +13 February 2001 + +( +MNCR +); +4 males +, +7 females +, same data except + +160m + +, + +9 September–9 October 2001 + +, K + +. + +Caballero +( +MNCR +); +3 males +, +2 females +, same data except ‘ +Sendero Guaymi’ +, + +300m + +, + +4 September–9 October 2000 + +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except ‘ +Cerro Brujo’ +, + +600m + +, + +3 November–5 December 2002 + +( +MNCR +); +4 males +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, +Osa Sierpe +, ACOSA, +Estación Los Planes +, + +180m + +, + +23–24 July 2002 + +, ABC-octenol, G + +. + +Chaverri’ +( +MNCR +); +4 males +, +3 females +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, +Reserva Florestal Golfo Dulce +, +Orilla de Estación Agujas +, + +250–350m + +, + +30 June–1 July 2000 + +, +light trap +, A + +. + +Picado’ +( +MNCR +); +1 male +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, +Reserva Biológica Isla Del Caño +, + +0–100m + +, + +28–30 August 2000 + +, +light trap +, J + +. + +Azofeifa Zuniga’ +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, +Golfito +, +Parque Nacional Piedras Blancas +, +Cerro Nicuesa +, + +579m + +, + +28 November 2000 + +– + +3 February 2001 + +, +Malaise, J + +. + +Azofeifa Zuniga’ +( +MNCR +); +1 male +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, +Peninsula de Osa +, +San Pedrillo +, + +13 August 2001 + +, A + +. + +Borkent’ +( +CNCI +); +1 male +, same data except ‘ +Río Agujas +, +Sendero Purruja +, + +300m + +, + +10–20 July 1996 + +, A + +. + +Azofeifa’ +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, + +2km +NE Tarcoles + +, + +20 July 1993 + +, A + +. + +Borkent’ +( +CNCI +); +2 females +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, +Palmar Sur +, + +5 August 1964 + +, F + +.S. + +Blanton’ +( +USNM +); +5 females +, ‘ +Alajuela +, +San Carlos +, +Pital +, +Boca Tapada +, +Finca de Sergio Murillo +, + +50–100m + +, + +21 July 2004 + +, +light trap +, B + +. + +Hernández’ +( +MNCR +); +5 females +, same data except ‘ +Laguna Lagarto Lodge’ +, + +23 June–23 July 2004 + +, +Malaise +( +1 female +CCER +; +4 females +MNCR +); +6 females +, same data except + +23 July–17 September 2004 + +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except ‘ +Bosque Ancianos’ +, + +23 June–23 July 2004 + +( +MNCR +); +4 females +, same data except + +23 July–17 September 2004 + +( +MNCR +); +4 females +, ‘ +Alajuela +, +Parque Nacional Arenal +, +Sendero Pilón +, + +600m + +, + +18 May–26 June 1999 + +, +Malaise, G + +. + +Carballo’ +( +MNCR +); +2 females +, same data except + +1–18 May 1999 + +( +MNCR +); +2 females +, same data except + +650m + +, + +08 November–07 December 2000 + +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except ‘Sector Cerro Chato’, + +1100m + +, + +25 August –25 September 1999 + +( +MNCR +); +3 females +, ‘ +Alajuela +, +Upala +, +Parque Nacional +Guanacaste +, + +Estación +San Ramón + +, 4.75 +Km SW Dos Ríos Upala +, + +860m + +, + +17 May–17 June 1996 + +, +Malaise, D + +. + +Briceno’ +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except + +720m + +, + +17 August–17 September 1996 + +, F + +. + +Quesada +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, ‘ +Alajuela +, +Upala +, +Parque Nacional Volcán Tenorio +, +Alb + +. + +Heliconias +, +Sendero Laguna Dantas +, + +900m + +, + +14–16 June 2007 + +, +Malaise, J + +.D. + +Gutiérrez’ +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except ‘ + +1000m + +, + +18 June 2000 + +, red de golpe, A + +. + +Picado’ +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except ‘ +Estación El Pilón +, + +700–800m + +, + +28 July 2003 + +, J + +. + +Azofeifa’ +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, ‘ +Cartago +, +Tres Equis +, +Parque Nacional Barbilla +, +Sendero +principal a +Río Barbilla +, + +500m + +, + +12 April–13 May 2002 + +, +Malaise, E + +. + +Rojas’ +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except + +12 June–11 July 2002 + +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except +11 July–12 + + +. August 2002 ( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except + +10 September– 10 October 2002 + +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except + +10 November–9 December 2002 + +( +MNCR +); +1 male +, +3 females +, same data except + +13 May–12 June 2002 + +, ‘red de golpe’ ( +MNCR +); +2 females +, same data except + +400–500m + +, + +19 August 2001 + +( +MNCR +); +1 male +, same data except ‘ +Sector +entre +Río Barbilla +, +Río Dantas’ +, + +485m + +, + +11 August –11 October 2002 + +( +MNCR +); +1 male +, ‘ +Cartago +, +Parque Nacional Barbilla +, +Campamento +2 + +. + +Sendero +a +Cerro Tigre +, + +1200m + +, + +7 May 2005 + +, B + +. + +Gamboa’ +( +CCER +); +2 females +, ‘ +Turrialba +, +Parque Nacional Barbilla +, + +2km +SE de Estación + +, + +500–600m + +, + +02July–19 August 2000 + +, +Malaise, E + +. + +Rojas’ +(1 +CCER +; 1 +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except ‘ + +3km +SE de Estación’ + +, + +19 August–20 September 2000 + +( +MNCR +); +1 male +, +1 female +, same data except + +20 September–18 October 2000 + +( +1 male +CCER +; +1 female +MNCR +); +2 females +, same data except ‘ +Sendero El Felino +, +1.5km +SO de +Estación’ +, + +690m + +, + +22 May–12 June 2001 + +( +MNCR +); +6 females +, same data except + +24 April–22 May 2001 + +( +1 female +CCER +; +5 females +MNCR +); +1 female +, ‘ +Guanacaste +, +Parque Nacional +Guanacaste +, +Estación +Pitilla + +. + +Sendero Cerro Orosilito +, + +900m + +, + +11–13 December 2007 + +, +Malaise, D + +. + +Briceno’ +( +CNCI +); +6 females +, ‘ +Heredia +, +Refugio Vida Silvestre Corredor Fronterizo +Costa Rica Nicaragua +, +Lagunas +a la par de +río San Juan +, + +20–50m + +, + +16 September 2004 + +, +Malaise, B + +. + +Hernández’ +( +1 female +CCER +; +5 females +MNCR +); +5 females +, same data, except ‘light trap’ ( +MNCR +); +5 females +, same data except + +23 July 2004 + +( +MNCR +); +2 females +, ‘ +Limón +, +Parque Nacional Tortuguero +, +Sendero Real +a +Agua Fria +, + +50–100m + +, + +14–21 August 2004 + +, +Malaise +, +Porras +, +Gamboa +, +Briceno +, +Moraga +, +Cardenas’ +(1 +CCER +; 1 +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except, ‘ +Estación +Agua Fria, Sendero Real’, + +20–50 m + +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except ‘ + +16 August 2004 + +, red noyes, M + +. + +Moraga’ +( +MNCR +); +1 female +, ‘ +Limón +, +Valle de la Estrella +, +Reserva Biológica Hitoy Cerere +, +Sendero Bobócara +, + +640m + +, + +18 May–18 June 1999 + +, +Malaise, F + +. + +Umana’ +( +MNCR +); +4 females +, same data except ‘ +Sendero Espavel +, + +560m + +, + +18 September–5 October 2003 + +, B + +. Gamboa, E. Rojas, W. + +Arana’ +( +MNCR +); +2 females +, ‘ +Limón +, +Cahuita +, + +30 October 1993 + +, A + +. + +Borkent’ +( +CNCI +); +1 male +, ‘ +San José +, ACLAP, +Pérez Zeledón + +. + +Parque Nacional Chirripó +, +Estación Santa Elena +, + +1850m + +, + +6 July–6 August 1997 + +, E + +. Alfaro, M. + +Segura’ +( +CCER +); +1 male +, same data except ‘ +Sendero Jueves +13, 2 + +. + +June +–6 +July +1997, red manual’ ( +MNCR +); +2 males +, same data except + +6 August–15 September 1997 + +( +MNCR +); +4 males +, +2 females +, ‘ +San José +, +Parque Nacional La Cangreja +, + +Estación +Ecotropica + +, + +300–400 m + +, + +13–17 July 2004 + +, +Malaise +, +Porras +, +Cardenas +, +Gamboa +, +Briceno +, +Moraga’ +( +1 male +CCER +; +3 males +, +2 females +CNCI +); +2 males +, same data except ‘amarilla’ ( +MNCR +); +5 males +, +2 females +, same data except ‘ + +13–14 July 2004 + +, balde’ ( +MNCR +); +1 female +, same data except ‘ +Sendero Plinia +, + +13–17 July 2004 + +’ ( +MNCR +); +1 male +, ‘ + +Downeshelea multilineata +(Lutz) + +, +COLOMBIA +, Valle +Rio Raposo +, + +15 April 1964 + +, +light trap +, V + +. H. + +Lee’ +( +CCER +); +1 male +, same data except + +August 1965 + +( +USNM +); +1 male +, ‘ + +Downeshelea multilineata +(Lutz) + +, +BRAZIL +, +Pará +, +Belém +, APEG forest, + +March 1970 + +, +sticky trap +, T + +.H.G. + +Aitken’ +( +USNM +); +1 male +, same data except + +July 1970 + +( +CCER +) + +. + + + + +Distribution and bionomics + + +This species is distributed in all provinces of +Costa Rica +and a locality in each of +Colombia +and +Brazil +( +Pará +) ( +Figure 10 +). It has been found in forested, coastal and mangrove areas, occurring in +Costa Rica +up to +1850 m +above sea level. + + + + +Etymology + + +The name of this species reflects its eclectic distribution and habitats, occurring in several habitats and altitudes in Neotropical countries, up to +1850 m +of altitude and in forested, coastal and mangrove areas (Greek – Eklektikos = eclectic). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFD1A61427ABCED5FE7CF91A.xml b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFD1A61427ABCED5FE7CF91A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..54b1a4708d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFD1A61427ABCED5FE7CF91A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,346 @@ + + + +New Neotropical species of Downeshelea Wirth and Grogan and redescription of D. multilineata (Lutz) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) + + + +Author + +Santarém, Maria Clara Alves + + + +Author + +Borkent, Art + + + +Author + +Spinelli, Gustavo + + + +Author + +Felippe-Bauer, Maria Luiza + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2018 + +J. Nat. Hist. + + +2018-03-07 + + +52 + + +9 - 10 + + +509 +540 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 + +journal article +10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 +1464-5262 +5178489 +9FC2A016-1295-4047-877E-BC9030BD2BD2 + + + + + + +Downeshelea jarina + +sp. nov. + + + + + +( +Figures 5a–h +, +9a–b +, +10 +) + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Male. +The only species of + +Downeshelea + +in the Americas with the following combination of features: gonostylus 0.54–0.64 length of gonocoxite; parameres fused for 0.10–0.17 of total length; stem basolaterally expanded, more slender and convergent distally; distal portion stout, nearly straight, heavily sclerotised ( +Figure 9b +); aedeagus subtriangular, basal arch U-shaped, extending to 0.22–0.28 of total length ( +Figure 9a +). + + +Female. +The only species of + +Downeshelea multilineata + +group in the Americas with small wing ( +0.92–1.02 mm +) ( +Figure 5d +); midtarsomere 1 with 3–6 ventral spines; hind tibia darker on proximal third and apical portion; two slightly unequal spermathecae ( +Figure 5h +). + + + + +Description + + +Male. +Head +. Eyes slightly contiguous in lower area; antennal ratio 0.88–0.97 (0.93, n = 7); palpal ratio 2.25–2.75 (2.57, n = 7) ( +Figure 5b +). + + +Thorax. +Brown, without definite pattern in slide-mounted specimens. Wing ( +Figure 5a +) with greyish spot over CuA +2 +extending to wing margin; 2 +nd +radial cell 2.5 times longer than 1 +st +; wing length 0.85–0.95 (0.92, n = 7) mm; breadth 0.30–0.35 (0.32, n = 7) mm; + +costal ratio 0.73–0.79 (0.77, n = 7). Halter pale, distal portion of knob darker. Legs + +( +Figure 5c +) pale brown, apex of fore tibia slightly darker; hind femur darker subapically, + +hind tibia darker on proximal third and apical portion. Fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one +basal, one apical spine; mid tarsomere 1 with two basal (one in some specimens), two +apical, 3–4 other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, hind legs: +1–1–1; 2–2–1, 1–1–1; fore tarsal ratio 2.18–2.37 (2.30, n = 7), mid tarsal ratio 2.50–2.73 +(2.60, n = 7), hind tarsal ratio 2.08–2.29 (2.10, n = 6); claws 0.38–0.54 (0.46, n = 7) length +of their respective tarsomere 5. + + +Figure 5. + +Downeshelea jarina + +sp. nov. +Male: (a) wing; (b) head, anterior view; (c) fore, mid, hind legs (left to right). Female: (d) wing; (e) head, anterior view; (f) fore, mid, hind tarsomeres (top to bottom); (g) palpus; (h) apex of female abdomen, ventral view. + + + +Abdomen. +Dark brown. Terminalia ( +Figure 9a +): tergite 9 with apex nearly rounded, apicolateral process short, broad; sternite 9 nearly straight anteriorly, posterior margin with moderately convex median lobe bearing 4–6 long setae. Gonocoxite 2.04–2.36 (2.22, n = 7) times longer than basal width; gonostylus with blunt tip, 0.58–0.64 (0.60, n = 7) length of gonocoxite. Parameres ( +Figure 9b +) 1.0-1.09 (1.05, n = 7) times longer than aedeagus, fused for 0.10–0.17 (0.15, n = 7) of total length; knob bulbous; stem basolaterally expanded, more slender and convergent distally; distal portion stout, nearly straight, heavily sclerotised, 0.54–0.62 (0.60, n = 6) of total length. Aedeagus subtriangular, heavily sclerotised laterally, hyaline on midportion, basal arch U-shaped, extending to 0.22–0.28 (0.25, n = 7) of total length; distal portion with moderately deep mesal excavation terminating in two sclerotised pointed serrate processes. + + +Female. +Similar to male with usual sexual differences; antennal ratio 1.05–1.10 (1.08, n = 5) ( +Figure 5e +); palpus as in + +Figure +5g + +, palpal ratio 2.20–2.75 (2.38, n = 5); mandible with 9–10 teeth. Wing as in +Figure 5d +; wing length 0.92–1.02 (0.98, n = 5) mm; breadth 0.37–0.42 (0.41, n = 5) mm; costal ratio 0.79–0.81 (0.80, n = 5). Fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal and one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with two basal, two apical, 3–6 other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, hind legs: 1–1–1, 2–2–1, 1–1–2; fore tarsal ratio 2.35–2.60 (2.50, n = 5), mid tarsal ratio 2.59–2.78 (2.67, n = 5), hind tarsal ratio 2.23–2.40 (2.31, n = 5); fore, mid- leg claws 0.53–0.67 (0.60, n = 5) length of their respective tarsomeres 5; hind leg claw, about 1.17–1.31 (1.25, n = 5) as long as tarsomere 5 ( +Figure 5f +). Abdomen with genital sclerite broad in distal portion, tapered to rounded tip anteriorly. Two slightly unequal spermathecae ( +Figure 5h +), measuring 50–60 (56, n = 4) by 43–55 (50, n = 5) µm and 45–55 (51, n = 5) by 40–50 (46, n = 3) µm. Third rudimentary spermatheca present, nearly 5 µm. + + +Specimens examined + + +Holotype +male adult, labeled ‘ + +Holotype + +Downeshelea jarina +Santarém, Borkent, Spinelli and Felippe-Bauer + +, +COSTA RICA +, +Guanacaste +, +Cuajiniquil +, +Playa Ostional +, 05m, + +13–16 June 2004 + +. +B. Gamboa +, +D. Briceno +, +M. Moraga +, +Y. Cardenas. Amarilla. +LN219450 350300 #77437’ ( +MNCR +); +allotype +female adult, labeled + +‘ + +Allotype + +Downeshelea jarina +Santarém, Borkent, Spinelli + +and Felippe-Bauer’, same data as holotype except Malaise ( +MNCR +) + +. + +Paratypes +labeled as follows: +5 males +, +4 females +, same data as holotype ( +2 males +, +2 females +CCER +; +3 males +, +2 females +MNCR +); +1 male +, +4 females +, same data as +allotype +( +CNCI +); +2 females +, same data except ‘manglar, intersección’ ( +MNCR +); +1 male +, ‘ +Puntarenas +, +Camaronal +, +Puesto +MINAE, + +5m + +, + +19–24 June 2004 + +, +Malaise, B + +. Gamboa, D. Briceno, M. Moraga, Y. + +Cardenas’ +( +MNCR +) + +. + + + + +Distribution and bionomics + + + +This species is restricted to +Costa Rica +( +Guanacaste +and +Puntarenas +provinces) ( +Figure 10 +) + +. It has been found in coastal and mangrove areas, occurring +5 m +above sea level. + + + + +Etymology + + +The name of this species reflects the name of the tree + +Enterolobium cyclocarpum +(Jacq.) Griseb. + + +that is a symbol of +Costa Rica +and +Guanacaste province +, where the majority of +type +specimens were found + +. + +The tree is commonly known in +Costa Rica +as ‘árbol +de Guanacaste’ +and/or jarina + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFD8A61C278ECF92FB31FB77.xml b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFD8A61C278ECF92FB31FB77.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..60f3f6e9cf8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFD8A61C278ECF92FB31FB77.xml @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ + + + +New Neotropical species of Downeshelea Wirth and Grogan and redescription of D. multilineata (Lutz) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) + + + +Author + +Santarém, Maria Clara Alves + + + +Author + +Borkent, Art + + + +Author + +Spinelli, Gustavo + + + +Author + +Felippe-Bauer, Maria Luiza + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2018 + +J. Nat. Hist. + + +2018-03-07 + + +52 + + +9 - 10 + + +509 +540 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 + +journal article +10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 +1464-5262 +5178489 +9FC2A016-1295-4047-877E-BC9030BD2BD2 + + + + + + +Downeshelea marambaia + +sp. nov. + + + + + +( +Figures 7a–d +, +9e–g +, +10 +) + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Male. +The only species of + +Downeshelea + +in the Americas with the following combination of features: gonostylus 0.65–0.66 length of gonocoxite; parameres fused for 0.12 of total length; stem slightly curved, convergent distally, slightly enlarged apically, distal portion strongly curved ( + +Figure +9g + +); aedeagus rectangular, basal arch shallow, extending to 0.17 of total length with two large elliptical sclerotised anteromesal areas ( +Figure 9f +). + + +Female. +Unknown. + + + + +Description + + +Male. +Head +. Eyes separated by a distance shorter than one ommatidia ( +Figure 7c +); antennal ratio 1.00 (n = 1) ( +Figure 7b +); palpal ratio 2.50 (n = 1) ( +Figure 7c +). + + +Thorax. +Brown, without definite pattern in slide-mounted specimens. Wing ( +Figure 7a +) with greyish spot over CuA +2 +reaching wing margin; 2 +nd +radial cell twice longer than 1 +st +; wing length 1.05 (n = 1) mm; breadth 0.37 (n = 1) mm; costal ratio 0.74 (n = 1). Halter knob brown, stem pale. Legs ( +Figure 7d +) brown, hind femur darker apically, hind tibia with subbasal dark band. Fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal, one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with two basal, two apical, three other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, hind legs: 2–2–3, 2–2–2, 1–1–1; fore tarsal ratio 2.25 (n = 1), mid tarsal ratio 2.52 (n = 1), hind tarsal ratio 2.24 (n = 1); claws 0.40 (n = 1) length of their respective tarsomere 5. + + +Abdomen. +Dark brown. Terminalia ( +Figure 9e +): tergite 9 with quadrate apex, apicolateral process elongate, slender, in bad condition in slide-mounted specimen (not illustrated); sternite 9 concave anteriorly, posterior margin in bad condition in slidemounted specimen (not illustrated). Gonocoxite 1.91–2.17 (2.04, n = 2) times longer than basal width; gonostylus delicate, 0.65–0.66 (0.65, n = 2) length of gonocoxite. Parameres ( + +Figure +9g + +) 1.16–1.17 (1.16, n = 2) times longer than aedeagus, fused for 0.12 (n = 1) of total length; knob bulbous; stem nearly straight, convergent distally, slightly expanded apically, distal portion strongly curved, tapering to tip, 0.56 (n = 1) of total length. Aedeagus ( +Figure 9f +) rectangular, enlarged distally, heavily sclerotised laterally, basal arch shallow, extending to 0.17 (n = 1) of total length with large elliptical sclerotised anteromesal areas reaching midlength of aedeagus; distal portion with deep mesal excavation terminating in two prominent sclerotised pointed serrate processes. + + +Female. +Unknown. + + +Specimens examined + + +Holotype +male adult, labeled ‘ + +Holotype + +Downeshelea marambaia +Santarém, Borkent, Spinelli and Felippe-Bauer + +, +BRAZIL +, +Rio de Janeiro +, +Itaguaí +, + +22 March 1990 + +, FEEMA team col.’ ( +CCER +) + +. + +Paratype +male labeled as +holotype +except +Marambaia island +, P + +. Armas, +29 October 1992 +, Quintelas col. (CCER). + + + + +Distribution and bionomics + + +This species is restricted to +Rio de Janeiro +( +Brazil +) in coastal areas of the Itaguai municipality ( +Figure 10 +). + + + + +Etymology + + +The name of this species refers to its distribution in Marambaia island, +Rio de Janeiro +, +Brazil +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFDAA61B2792C85DFC87FCEE.xml b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFDAA61B2792C85DFC87FCEE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cfa8c5589f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFDAA61B2792C85DFC87FCEE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,360 @@ + + + +New Neotropical species of Downeshelea Wirth and Grogan and redescription of D. multilineata (Lutz) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) + + + +Author + +Santarém, Maria Clara Alves + + + +Author + +Borkent, Art + + + +Author + +Spinelli, Gustavo + + + +Author + +Felippe-Bauer, Maria Luiza + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2018 + +J. Nat. Hist. + + +2018-03-07 + + +52 + + +9 - 10 + + +509 +540 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 + +journal article +10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 +1464-5262 +5178489 +9FC2A016-1295-4047-877E-BC9030BD2BD2 + + + + + + +Downeshelea litorale + +sp. nov. + + + + + +( +Figures 6a–h +, +9c–d +, +10 +) + + + + + + + +Downeshelea multilineata +: +Huerta et al. 1999: 494 + + +(misidentification; +Mexico +record). + + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Male. +The only species of + +Downeshelea + +in the Americas with the following combination of features: gonostylus 0.58–0.68 length of gonocoxite; parameres fused for 0.23–0.30 of total length; stem nearly straight basally, expanded distally in inner portion; distal portion very elongate, strongly curved distally ( +Figure 9d +); aedeagus rectangular, basal arch somewhat U-shaped, extending to 0.34–0.42 of total length ( +Figure 9c +). + + +Female. +The only species of + +Downeshelea multilineata + +group in the Americas with medium-sized wing ( +1.05–1.25 mm +) ( +Figure 6d +); midtarsomere 1 with 4–5 ventral spines; hind tibia uniformly brown; two slightly unequal spermathecae ( +Figure 6h +). + + + + +Description + + +Male. +Head +. Eyes slightly contiguous in lower area; antennal ratio 1.00–1.07 (1.02, n = 8); palpal ratio 2.20–2.75 (2.46,n = 8) ( +Figure 6b +). + + +Thorax. +Brown, without definite pattern in slide-mounted specimens. Wing ( +Figure 6a +) with greyish spot over CuA +1 +, CuA +2 +extending into cua +1 +, anal cell, reaching wing margin in CuA +1 +; 2 +nd +radial cell twice longer than 1 +st +; wing length 1.00–1.17 (1.08, n = 8) mm; breadth 0.32–0.40 (0.37, n = 8) mm; costal ratio 0.71–0.75 (0.73, n = 8). Halter brown, distal portion of knob darker. Legs ( +Figure 6c +) brown, hind femur darker subapically. Fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal, one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with two basal, two apical, 4–6 other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, hind legs: 2–2–2, 2–2–1, 1–1–1; fore tarsal ratio 2.21–2.35 (2.27, n = 8), mid tarsal ratio 2.22– 2.55 (2.42, n = 8), hind tarsal ratio 2.09–2.33 (2.17, n = 8); claws 0.38–0.50 (0.44, n = 8) length of their respective tarsomere 5. + + +Abdomen. +Dark brown. Terminalia ( +Figure 9c +): tergite 9 with quadrate apex, apicolateral process elongate, slender; sternite 9 slightly concave anteriorly, posterior margin with a moderately convex median lobe bearing 3–4 long setae. Gonocoxite nearly 2.15– 2.36 (2.27, n = 8) times longer than basal width; gonostylus with blunt tip, 0.58–0.68 (0.63, n = 8) length of gonocoxite. Parameres ( +Figure 9d +) 1.06–1.23 (1.11, n = 8) times longer than aedeagus, fused for 0.23–0.30 (0.26, n = 8) of total length; knob heavily sclerotised, bulbous; stem nearly straight basally, expanded distally in inner portion; distal portion very elongate, strongly curved distally, 0.62–0.73 (0.69, n = 8) of total length. Aedeagus rectangular, slightly sclerotised laterally, basal arch somewhat U-shaped, deep, extending to 0.34–0.42 (0.38, n = 8) of total length, distal portion with moderately deep mesal excavation terminating in two short, pointed, serrate processes. + + +Female. +Similar to male with usual sexual differences; antennal ratio 1.06–1.17 (1.11, n = 5) ( +Figure 6e +); palpus as in + +Figure +6g + +, palpal ratio 2.20–2.60 (2.36, n = 5); mandible with 11–12 teeth. Wing as in +Figure 6d +; wing length 1.05–1.25 (1.15, n = 5) mm; breadth 0.40–0.50 (0.46, n = 5) mm; costal ratio 0.75–0.80 (0.77, n = 5). Fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal and one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with two basal, two apical, 4–5 other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, hind legs: 1–1–1, 2–2–1, 1–1–2; fore tarsal ratio 2.25–2.50 (2.32, n = 5), mid tarsal ratio 2.45–2.54 (2.49, n = 5), hind tarsal ratio 2.37–2.50 (2.43, n = 5); fore, mid- leg claws 0.66–0.87 (0.71, n = 5) length of their respective tarsomeres 5; hind leg claw about 1.0–1.4 (1.11, n = 4) as long as tarsomere 5 ( +Figure 6f +). Abdomen with genital sclerite nearly triangular, trilobed, tapering anteriorly. Two slightly unequal spermathecae ( +Figure 6h +), measuring 55–65 (60, n = 5) by 43–50 (47, n = 5) µm and 50–58 (54, n = 4) by 40–48 (44, n = 4) µm. Third rudimentary spermatheca nearly 7.5 µm. + + +Specimens examined + + +Holotype +male adult, labeled ‘ +Holotype + +Downeshelea litorale +Santarém, Borkent, Spinelli + +and Felippe-Bauer’, ‘ + +Downeshelea multilineata +(Lutz) + +, +BAHAMAS +, W.I. Coral Harbour, New Province, +23 November 1968 +, G.M. Stobes col., light trap’ (USNM); +allotype +female adult, labeled ‘ +Allotype + +Downeshelea litorale +Santarém, Borkent, Spinelli + +and Felippe-Bauer’ same data as +holotype +(USNM). +Paratypes +labeled as follows: +1 male +, ‘ +BRAZIL +, +Rio de Janeiro +, Jacarepaguá, Tanque, +July 1972 +, Tavares and Souza cols.’ (CCER); +1 male +, ‘ +COSTA RICA +, +Limón +, Parque Nacional Cahuita, Sector Puerto Vargas, +5m +, +9 August–15 October 2002 +, E. Rojas. Malaise’ (CNCI); +1 male +, same data except +15 December 2002 +– +15 January 2003 +(MNCR); +1 male +, ‘ + +Downeshelea multilineata +(Lutz) + +, +DOMINICA +, Cabrit Swamp, +23 February 1965 +, W. Wirth, Bredin-Archbold, Smithsonian biological survey Dominica’ (USNM); +2 males +, +3 females +, ‘ + +Downeshelea multilineata +(Lutz) + +, +JAMAICA +, +Westmoreland Parish +Negril, Crystal Waters Tropical Hammock, +20 November 1968 +, R. E. Woodruff, black light trap’ ( +1 male +, +1 female +CCER; +1 male +, +2 females +USNM); +1 male +, +1 female +, same data except ‘ +22 June 1970 +, light trap, E.G. Farnworth’ (USNM); +3 males +, +2 females +, ‘ + +Downeshelea multilineata +(Lutz) + +, GRAND CAYMAN, +14 July 1991 +, P. Fitzgerald, black light trap’ ( +1 male +, +1 female +CCER; +2 males +, +1 female +USNM); +1 female +, same data except +October 1991 +(USNM); +2 males +, ‘ +MEXICO +, +Yucatan +, Reserva Río Lagartos, Tizimin, entrada a Zacbo, selva baja, +19 March 1996 +, light trap, Ibáñez-Bernal col.’ (CAIM). + + + + +Distribution and bionomics + + +This species is known from the +Mexico +, +Bahamas +, Grand Cayman, +Jamaica +, +Dominica +, +Costa Rica +( +Limón +) and +Brazil +( +Rio de Janeiro +) ( +Figure 10 +). It has been found in forests near coastal areas. + + + + +Etymology + + +The name of this species reflects its distribution along seashores in the Caribbean, +Mexico +, +Costa Rica +and +Brazil +(Latin – litorale = seashore). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFDFA61D279AC90AFBCEF9B7.xml b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFDFA61D279AC90AFBCEF9B7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0c9e275533b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5B/87/375B87BEFFDFA61D279AC90AFBCEF9B7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,243 @@ + + + +New Neotropical species of Downeshelea Wirth and Grogan and redescription of D. multilineata (Lutz) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) + + + +Author + +Santarém, Maria Clara Alves + + + +Author + +Borkent, Art + + + +Author + +Spinelli, Gustavo + + + +Author + +Felippe-Bauer, Maria Luiza + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2018 + +J. Nat. Hist. + + +2018-03-07 + + +52 + + +9 - 10 + + +509 +540 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 + +journal article +10.1080/00222933.2018.1437231 +1464-5262 +5178489 +9FC2A016-1295-4047-877E-BC9030BD2BD2 + + + + + + +Downeshelea moravia + +sp. nov. + + + + + +( +Figures 7e–h +, +9h–i +, +10 +) + + + + +Diagnosis + + +Male. +The only species of + +Downeshelea + +in the Americas with the following combination of features: gonostylus 0.69 length of gonocoxite; parameres fused for 0.25 of total length, stem sinuous, proximal 2/3 stout, directed posterolaterally, distal 1/3 slender, directed posteromesally; distal portion aculeate ( +Figure 9i +); aedeagus subtriangular, basal arch U-shaped, extending to 0.38 of total length with elliptical sclerotised anterior areas ( +Figure 9h +). + + +Female. +Unknown. + + + + +Description + + +Male. +Head +. Eyes separated by a distance shorter than one ommatidia; antennal ratio 1.02 ( +Figure 7f +); palpal ratio 1.7 ( + +Figure +7g + +). + + +Thorax. +Brown, without definite pattern in slide-mounted specimens. Wing ( +Figure 7e +) + + +with greyish spot over CuA, CuA +1 +, CuA +2 +extending into cua +1 +, anal cell, reaching wing margin, anal cell with greyish area in middle not reaching wing margin; 2 +nd +radial cell twice longer than 1 +st +; wing length +1.37 mm +; breadth +0.47 mm +; costal ratio 0.75. Halter + + +brown, distal portion of knob darker. Legs ( +Figure 7h +) brown, hind tibia slightly pale + +apically. Fore-, hind tarsomere 1 with one basal, one apical spine; midtarsomere 1 with two +basal, two apical, seven other ventral spines; apical spines of tarsomeres 2–4 of fore-, mid-, +hind legs: 2–3–3, 2–2–2, 1–1–1; fore tarsal ratio 2.48, mid tarsal ratio 2.60, hind tarsal ratio +2.49; claws 0.38 length of their respective tarsomere 5. + +Abdomen. +Dark brown. Terminalia ( +Figure 9h +): tergite 9 with quadrate apex, apicolateral process elongate, slender; sternite 9 slightly concave anteriorly, posterior margin with a poorly developed convex median lobe bearing three long setae. Gonocoxite 2.30 times longer than basal width; gonostylus broader basally, tapering gradually to blunt tip, 0.69 length of gonocoxite. Parameres ( +Figure 9i +) 1.02 times longer than aedeagus fused for 0.25 of total length with short posteromedian projection on the medial fused portion of parameres; knob slender, directed anteriorly; stem sinuous, proximal 2/3 stout, directed posterolaterally, distal 1/3 slender, directed posteromesally; distal portion aculeate, 0.50 of total length. Aedeagus subtriangular, heavily sclerotised laterallly, basal arch U-shaped, extending to 0.38 of total length with elliptical sclerotised anterior areas; distal portion with moderately deep mesal excavation terminating in two sclerotised pointed serrate processes. + + +Female. +Unknown. + + +Specimens examined + + +Holotype +male adult, labeled ‘ + +Holotype +, + +Downeshelea moravia +Santarém, Borkent, Spinelli and Felippe-Bauer + +, +COSTA RICA +, Prov. +San José +, +Moravia +, +Zurquí de Moravia +, +Sendero +torre, + +1600m + +, + +12 September 2012 + +, Proyecto ZABDI team col, +Pan light trap +, ZABDI-21. −84:00:56 10:02:58 #105001’ ( +MNCR +) + +. + + + + +Distribution and bionomics + + + +This +species is found in forested areas in +Costa Rica +( +San José +) at + +1600 m +above sea level + +( +Figure 10 +) + +. + + + + +Etymology + + +This species is named after its distribution in Cantón de Moravia, +San José +, +Costa Rica +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/30/375C306883EB0629D896EA588091BFE5.xml b/data/37/5C/30/375C306883EB0629D896EA588091BFE5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8cb8b1886a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/30/375C306883EB0629D896EA588091BFE5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ + + + +Fourmis du Musée de Bruxelles. Fourmis de Benguela récoltées par M. Creighton Wellman, et fourmis du Congo récoltées par MM. Luja, Kohl et Laurent. + + + +Author + +Forel, A. + +text + + +Annales de la Societe Entomologique de Belgique + + +1909 + +53 + + +51 +73 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/4018/4018.pdf + +journal article +4018 + + + + +6. +Rhoptromyrmex opacus Emery var. esta +n. var. + + + +— Le pangolin a aussi decouvert et absorbe en nombre tres considerable une variete d'une espece fort interessante que mon ami M. Emery avait recue dans le temps de Kamerun (Conradt) et dont il m'avait envoye un type sous ce nom (1). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87D3FFA6FFDC9B704861FB9BFB5A.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87D3FFA6FFDC9B704861FB9BFB5A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fe9a576cc35 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87D3FFA6FFDC9B704861FB9BFB5A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,576 @@ + + + +A new green-coloured Lusitanipus Mauriès, 1978 from the Iberian Peninsula (Diplopoda: Callipodida: Dorypetalidae) + + + +Author + +Gilgado, José D. +A1AD54CE-377D-4A62-8C21-769CDB48C6B2 +Section of Conservation Biology, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel. St. Johanns-Vorstadt 10, CH- 4056, Basel, Switzerland. Centro Mixto UCM-ISCIII de Evolución y Comportamiento Humanos. Avenida del Monforte de Lemos, 5. Pabellón 14. E- 28029, Madrid, Spain. Departamento de Zoología y Biología Celular Animal, Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad del País Vasco, Apdo. 644, E- 48080, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain. +josedomingo.gilgadohormaechea@unibas.ch + + + +Author + +Martínez-Pillado, Virginia +A5DBED4D-381A-47B0-B3B8-6C7954D8CFDC +Centro Mixto UCM-ISCIII de Evolución y Comportamiento Humanos. Avenida del Monforte de Lemos, 5. Pabellón 14. E- 28029, Madrid, Spain. +vmpillado@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Prieto, Carlos E. +CAC20D21-78FF-4B8A-8023-F06A06EA031F +Departamento de Zoología y Biología Celular Animal, Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad del País Vasco, Apdo. 644, E- 48080, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain. +carlos.prieto@ehu.eus + +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy + + +2020 + +2020-09-08 + + +714 + + +1 +14 + + + +journal article +20987 +10.5852/ejt.2020.714 +de977da4-2333-421c-a1cb-290105aa2cb0 +4020947 +90AE9367-9A85-4BC9-8479-5BA095BD1BD1 + + + + + + +Lusitanipus xanin +Gilgado + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +2B1CB681-38B8-4F13-99B3-1DAFFE514367 + + + +Figs 1 +D–6 + + + + + +Diagnosis + + + + +Lusitanipus xanin + +sp. nov. +differs from the other Iberian callipodidan species in the same characters as + +Lusitanipus alternans + +(see +Reboleira & Enghoff 2015 +), except that + +Lusitanipus xanin + +sp. nov. +, has metazonital crests of similar size, whereas + +Lusitanipus alternans + +has crests of different sizes ( +Verhoeff 1893 +; +Spelda 2015 +; +Reboleira & Enghoff 2015 +). Furthermore, + +Lusitanipus xanin + +sp. nov. +differs from + +L. alternans + +in its green colour, the higher number of body rings, the shape of the gonocoxite, and the curvature and shape of the processes of the tip of telopodites of gonopods. + + + + + +Etymology + + + +The specific epithet + +xanin + +(noun in apposition) is the name of a goblin-like mythological creature, the “Xanín”. This being supposedly inhabits the forests of the region were this species was found (El Bierzo). As the “Xanín”, this species is a small creature dwelling on the ground under the shade of the foliage that is seldomly seen and tries to hide when discovered. + + + + + +Type material + + + + + +Holotype + + + +SPAIN +• +♂ +; +León province +, +el Bierzo +, +Peñarrubia +; +42°27 44.2̎ N +, +6°48 32.6̎ W +; + +405 m +a.s.l. + +; + +21 Jun. 2019 + +; +José D. Gilgado +and +Virginia Martínez-Pillado +leg.; +slope beside the road parallel to the Peñarrubia reservoir; under stones +; +MNCN 20.07 +/2069. + + + + +Paratypes + + + + +SPAIN +• +1 ♀ +, same collection data as for holotype; +MNCN 20.07/2070 + +• + +1 ♂ +, +León province +, +el Bierzo +, +Peñarrubia +; +42°27 19.2̎ N +, +6°49 6.9̎ W +; + +430 m +a.s.l. + +; + +12 Oct. 2006 + +; +Carlos E. Prieto +leg; +entrance of small cave without name, close to the dam +; +MNCN 20.07/2071 + +. + + + + + +Description + + + +BODY SIZE. +Holotype +male: 60 body rings including collum, telson; two apodous rings before telson. Body approximately +50 mm +long; +2.5 mm +high; +2.3 mm +wide at mid-body section. +Paratype +male: 62 body rings (two apodous); approximately +39.5 mm +long; +2.2 mm +high; +2.05 mm +wide at mid-body section. Female: 63 rings (two apodous); +53 mm +long; +2.8 mm +high; +2.45 mm +wide at mid-body section. + + +COLOUR. Living specimens: intense green colour, dorsally darker, ventrally lighter ( +Fig. 1D +). Dorsal median light stripe absent. In first body rings, prozonites lighter, posterior half of metazonites darker than anterior part, darker (brownish) crests than intercrests. Colour pattern subtly, progressively changing towards end of body, getting more even, mostly in prozonites; metazonites having more intense darker green colour ( +Fig. 2 +). Legs pale beige ( +Fig. 2 +). Antennomeres 2–5 pigmented in greyish colour, more in distal extremes; antennomeres 6–7 little or no pigmentation ( +Figs 2 +, +3B +). Colour fading to paler brownish or greyish tone ( +Fig. 3A +) after long-term storage in ethanol. + + +HEAD. Convex, without flattened area or bumps of + +Cyphocallipus + +( +Figs 2 +, +3A, C +), covered with small setae, larger on forehead than posterior part of head. Posterior region having lighter colour than forehead ( +Fig. 3A, C +). Eyes with ca 59 ommatidia distributed in eight rows ( +Fig. 3A +). Tömosvary organ dorsally between eyes, insertion of antennae, closer to former, being only slightly larger than largest ommatidia. Antennomeres of similar shape, proportions to + +L. alternans + +, with 6–7 lacking pigmentation ( +Fig. 3B +). Antennomere 5 distally, laterally with sensory region full of short, dense sensillae, also present in + +L. alternans + +and other +Dorypetalidae +species as + +Dorypetalum helenae +( +Stoev & Enghoff 2006 +) + +. + + +TRUNK. Collum: colour pattern as in +Fig. 3C +, not very marked crests. Five setae on each side of median half, with setae a,d–e in anterior position; b slightly more posterior than a; c slightly more posterior than b ( +Table 1 +). Chaetotaxy of first seven rings as in +Table 1 +, all setae posterior from body ring 6. Prozonites with scale-like microsculpture, narrow, not very marked crest-like lines, not always continuous with crests of metazonite ( +Fig. 3D +). Crests of metazonites equal in size, unlike + +L. alternans + +. Pleurotergite 7 with 18 crests on each side. In male +holotype +, ozopores present from ring 5 (very inconspicuous on this ring) up to ring 57. Ozopores placed between anterior extremes of 5 +th +– 6 +th +crest, except first one: closer to 5 +th +crest. + + +LEGS. First pair of smaller size than following, with bump on coxae. Second pair slightly larger, showing gonopores. Two first pairs having one macroseta on inner part of prefemora, bundles of macrosetae in inner side of femora, postfemora; in tarsus: brush-like row of setae on inner side ( +Fig. 4 +A–B). Leg 3 not having these bundles of macrosetae, instead: fields of small aggregated setae on inner side of prefemur, femur, postfemur. Leg 3 showing, under optic microscopy, brush-like row of setae on tarsus, papillae ( +Fig. 4C +). Leg 3 with coxal sacs, conspicuous from legs 3–16, missing or not visible in following ones ( +Fig. 4 +C–D). Leg 4 seemingly without brush-like row of setae but with papillae, aggregated inner fields of setae on inner side of trochanter, prefemur, femur, postfemur ( +Fig. 4 +D–E). Same pattern repeated on all legs, except for last 15, lacking these papillae, fields of setae. Claws of all legs well developed, two basal minor spines ( +Fig. 4E +). + + +TELSON ( +Fig. 3F +). Epiproct with one spinneret, four setae at each side of sagittal plane, two most proximal setae in middle, two most distal ones close to posterior margin. Paraproct bipartite, with macroseta in each division, as in + +L. alternans + +. Hypoproct tripartite with 1+2+1 setae. + + +MALE GONOPODS ( +Fig. 5 +). Gonocoxite ( +c +) simple, narrow, with almost semi-circular arc ( +arc +) in middle part, row of setae on posterior margin, as seen in lateral view ( +Fig. 5B +). Arc of gonocoxite ending in blunt semi-rectangular process ( +srp +), almost as long as arc, narrower in central part, pilose on distal margins ( +Fig. 5 +A–C). Process flat on interior side, without “spoon-like” shape to accommodate telopodite. Pair of membranous structures ( +m +) of small size interiorly placed between bases of gonocoxites ( +c +), posteriorly to pseudoflagellum ( +f +), telopodites ( +t +). Membranous structures ( +m +) seemingly triangular shaped in posterior view, however in lateral view: subrectangular projection ( +sp +) in margin. Homologous structure present in + +L. alternans + +in fig. 5A of +Reboleira & Enghoff (2015) +, with similar but slightly different shape. Pseudoflagellum (or hornflagellum) ( +f +) straight, as in + +L. alternans + +, almost as long as telopodite ( +t +). Telopodite ending in complex structure similar to + +L. alternans + +, with several differences ( +Figs 5 +D–E, 6): tip of telopodite ( +l +) flat (as a lamella), curved in way that tip projecting towards solenomerite ( +s +), similarly to hook ( +Figs 5D +, +6B +). Same processes as + +L. alternans + +present, except for γ, having several differences ( +Fig. 6 +): α shorter, less twisted (only slightly curved in tip), placed more basally; β short, not twisted, shape of solenomerite ( +s +) slightly different: narrow pointy process pointing anteriorly, shorter pointy tip projecting towards tip of telopodite. + + + +Fig. 2. +External morphology of + +Lusitanipus xanin + +sp. nov. +in lateral view. +A +. ♂ holotype (MNCN 20.07/2069). +B +. ♀ paratype (MNCN 20.07/2070). Scale bar = 5 mm. + + + + +Fig. 3. +Morphological details of + +Lusitanipus xanin + +sp. nov. +A +. Head of ♂ paratype (note: colour has faded after 13 years in ethanol) (MNCN 20.07/2071). +B +. Last antennomeres of ♀ paratype (MNCN 20.07/2070). +C +. Posterodorsal part of the head of ♀ paratype and collum in dorsal view (MNCN 20.07/2070). +D +. Dorsal part of pleurotergites 5 (only partially visible) to 7 in lateral view (MNCN 20.07/2070). +E +. Detail of ventral part of first rings of ♀ in lateral view, with posterior tip of collum and pleurotergite 2 visible, four first pair of legs (second reduced) and coxal sacs (MNCN 20.07/2070). +F +. Telson and last rings of ♀ paratype (MNCN 20.07/2070). Scale bars = 0.5 mm. + + + + +Table 1. +Chaetotaxy of the first seven rings (pleurotergites) of + +Lusitanipus xanin + +sp. nov. +Setae order (a–e), reflects proximity to sagittal plane, with (a) being the closest. (A) means anterior, (A*) means that it is close to the anterior position or in the middle, and (P) means posterior. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+a + +b + +c + +d + +e +
+Collum 1 +AA*A*AA
+Pleurotergite 2 +AAAA*A
+Pleurotergite 3 +AAAAA
+Pleurotergite 4 +AAAAA*
+Pleurotergite 5 +APPA*P
+Pleurotergite 6 +PPPPP
+Pleurotergite 7 +PPPPP
+ + +FEMALE. First pair of legs of smaller size compared to third pair of legs. Second pair of legs reduced ( +Fig. 3E +). Second pleurotergite without conspicuous ventrolateral posteriad process as + +Cyphocallipus excavatus + +(see +Hoffman 2009 +), margin describing subtle tentative insinuation of process in that position ( +Fig. 3E +). Everted coxal sacs visible from third pair of legs, as male ( +Fig. 3E +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DE8B7FDFEFB2D.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DE8B7FDFEFB2D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1b5d16669cf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DE8B7FDFEFB2D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +Gillmeria macrornis +(Meyrick, 1930) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♂ (CUK), Sosnovka, +19.vii.1986 +, 1 ♂, +26.vii.1986 +, 1 ♀, +30.vii.1986 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 1 ♀ (CUK), Durgen, +14.vii.1986 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (CUK), Azas, +21.–22.vii.2000 +, O. Kosterin.; 1 ♂, 3 ♀ (CUK), Shivilig, +10.viii.2010 +, R. Yakovlev. + + + + +Distribution. +South-eastern European +Russia +, Middle Asia, Siberia, Russian Far East (South Primorye), +Mongolia +, +China +( +Shaanxi +, +Sichuan +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DE996FE4AFCEE.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DE996FE4AFCEE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..52e212d1763 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DE996FE4AFCEE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +PlatyPtilia tesseradactyla +(Linnaeus, 1761) + + + + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, +Iran +, + +East +Kazakhstan + +, the entire Siberia, +Mongolia +, +Sakhalin +, +Magadan Province +, North America. + + +Note +. Reported for +Tuva +on the materials of the Zoological Institute of +St. Petersburg +(Ustjuzhanin, Kovtunovich, 2008a). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEA89FA8CFD8F.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEA89FA8CFD8F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7b59756c9ae --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEA89FA8CFD8F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +PlatyPtilia nemoralis +Zeller, 1841 + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 2 ♂, 1 ♀ (CUK), Durgen, +14.–19.vii.1986 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 2 ♂, 1 ♀ (CUK), Azas, +21.– 22.vii.2000 +, O. Kosterin. + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, Siberia, Russian Far East (Primorye, the Kuril islands), +China +( +Xinjiang +), +Japan +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEB83FB17FE89.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEB83FB17FE89.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1ee9f644485 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEB83FB17FE89.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +PlatyPtilia gonodactyla + +([Denis & Schiffermüller] 1775) + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♂ (CUK), Durgen, +10.viii.1986 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 1 ♂ (CUK), Shagonar, +11.viii.2010 +, R. Yakovlev; 1 ♀ (CRS), Bai-Khaak, +12.–13.vii.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, +Asia Minor +, +Kazakhstan +, Siberia, Russian Far East, +Mongolia +, +China +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEDFFFB90F819.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEDFFFB90F819.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..089d2dd6647 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEDFFFB90F819.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +ParaPlatyPtilia hedemanni +(Snellen, 1884) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 13 ex. (CUK), Khandagaity, +4.vii.2002 +, R. Yakovlev; 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (CUK), Mugur-Aksy (East), +4.vii.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 1 ♂ (CRS), Bai-Khaak, +12.–13.vii.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj; 1 ♂ (CUK), Kok-Khol, +29.vi.–3.vii.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. + + + + +Distribution. +South Siberia, +Kazakhstan +, +Mongolia +, Russian Far East (Primorye) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEEF2FBD5F926.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEEF2FBD5F926.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e8e809213a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEEF2FBD5F926.xml @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +Gillmeria +stenoPtiloides + +(Filipjev, 1927) + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♂ (CUK), Dus-Dag, +26.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 8 ex. (CUK), Azas, +21.–22.vii.2000 +, O. Kosterin; 5 ♂ (CRS), Bai-Khaak, +12.–13.vii.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. + + + + +Distribution. +Siberia, Russian Far East, +Mongolia +, +China +, +Japan +(Honshu). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEFF5FC64FA20.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEFF5FC64FA20.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dd2df3cad0f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C652FFEDFF0DEFF5FC64FA20.xml @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +Gillmeria Pallidactyla +(Haworth, 1811) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♀ (CUK), Ottug-Khol', +18.vii.2004 +, O. Kosterin; 1 ♀ (CUK), Chagatai, +10.vii.2007 +, V. Zachozhev; + +2 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +(CRS), Khovu-Aksu, + +10.–11.vii.2004 + +, +J. Hron +, +M. Cesanek +& + +J. Rekelj. +Distribution. +Temperate + +zone of the Palaearctic; +North America. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C653FFECFF0DEC0DFDC9F808.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C653FFECFF0DEC0DFDC9F808.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2dd5301d15d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C653FFECFF0DEC0DFDC9F808.xml @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +PlatyPtilia farfarella +Zeller, 1867 + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♀ (CUK), Durgen, +14.vii.1986 +, P. Ustjuzhanin. + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, Africa, +Western +Asia, the Caucasus, the entire Siberia, Russian Far East, +Japan +, +China +( + +Taiwan +) + +, +Mongolia +, +Kazakhstan +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C653FFECFF0DED24FB82F975.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C653FFECFF0DED24FB82F975.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d54cf90c2b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C653FFECFF0DED24FB82F975.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +PlatyPtilia calodactyla + +([Denis & Schiffermüller],1775) + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♂ (CUK), Tere-Khol', +15.vii.2000 +, O. Kosterin. + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, +Kazakhstan +, Siberia, Russian Far East, +Mongolia +, +China +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C653FFECFF0DEE5EFD2CFA5A.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C653FFECFF0DEE5EFD2CFA5A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..29a1e9ee799 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C653FFECFF0DEE5EFD2CFA5A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +Agdistis adactyla + +(Hübner, [1823]) + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ex. (CUK), Kyzyl, +22.vii.1988 +, V. Zinchenko; 1 ♂ (CUK), Kyzyl, +22.vi.2004 +, O. Kosterin; 1 ♂ (CRS), Bai-Khaak, +12.–13.vii.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. + + + + +Distribution +. Temperate zone of the Palaearctic. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFE9FF0DEE30FE6CF8B2.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFE9FF0DEE30FE6CF8B2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..62f1b3c847b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFE9FF0DEE30FE6CF8B2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,332 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +StenoPtilia lasani +Ustjuzhanin, Rekelj & Kovtunovich + +, +sp.nov. + + + + +( +Figs. 2–4 +) + + + + + + +Type +material. + +Holotype +: female ( +SMNH 0283 +) +Tuva +, +Tandinsky distr. +, vill. +Balgazyn +env., Sands- + +Pinus + +, tract +Shambalyg +, + +990 m + +, +51°10′N +, +95°01′E +., + +11.vi.2004 + +, J. Hron & M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. In Coll + +. SMNH. + +Paratypes +: +8 ♂ +3 ♀ +, ( +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +ZISP +; +2 ♂ +CUK +; +1 ♂ +SMNH +; +3 ♂ +, +2 ♀ +CRS; +1 ♂ +CLS) with same data as holotype + +; + +2 ♂ +3 ♀ +, ( +1 ♂ +2 ♀ +CUK +; +1 ♂ +1 ♀ +CRS); +Tuva +, +Kaa-Chem distr. +, +Academician Obruchev rd. +, +Ondum +reserve, canyon +Ondum +, + +800 m + +( +Fig. 5 +), +52°37′N +, +96°47′E +, + +12.vi.2004 + +, J. Hron & M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj + +; + +1 ♀ +( +CUK +); +Tuva +, W. +Tannu-Ola Mts. +, +40 km +NE vill. +Khandagaity +, + +2350 m + +, +50°43′N +, +92°20′E +, + +22.vi. 2004 + +, +J. Hron +& +M. Cesanek +& J. +Rekelj. + + + +External characters. +Head, thorax and tegula pale grey. Labial palpus brown laterally, white above, short, length equal to eye diameter or slightly longer. Antenna thin, dark grey. Wingspan +22–24 mm +(in +holotype +23 mm +). Fore wing brown-grey, distinctive elongated dark brown spot at cleft base. Small round spot in median part of wing. Fringe inside cleft pale grey. Two dark brown spots on outer edge of fringe on first and second lobe. Hind wing unicolorous, brown-grey. Colour of fringe on all three lobes the same as ground colour of wing. Hind leg pale grey. + + + + +Male genitalia. +Valva slightly concave on upper edge in middle. Cucullus narrow, smoothly arched, apex slightly tapered. Uncus short, narrow triangle, apex slightly extended beyond posterior edge of tegumen. Tegumen lobes not expressed, small depression in median part of tegumen. Anellus arms short, slightly curved, far from reaching uncus base. Phallus significantly shorter than valva, bent at right angle. Thin, long cornutus in median part of phallus, large group of small spinules filling distal ¼. Basal process of phallus bent towards caecum. + + + +FIGURES 2. + +Stenoptilia lasani +Ustjuzhanin, Rekelj & Kovtunovich + + +sp. nov. + +2. Adult (Holotype). + + + + +FIGURES 3. + +Stenoptilia lasani +Ustjuzhanin, Rekelj & Kovtunovich + + +sp. nov. + +3. Male genitalia (Paratype); + + + + +FIGURES 4. + +Stenoptilia lasani +Ustjuzhanin, Rekelj & Kovtunovich + + +sp. nov. + +4. Female genitalia (Holotype). + + + +Female genitalia. +Ostium bursae rounded, width ¼ of the space between posterior apophyses. Antrum parallel-sided, distinctly sclerotized, width half the length of it, slightly shorter than signum, somewhat obliquely directed with respect to longitudinal axis of body. Distal part of antrum slightly narrowed and rounded. Ductus equal to posterior apophyses in length, sharply bent as S-shaped, slightly expanded near inception to bursa copulatrix. Indistinctly expressed sclerotized cord in middle of ductus. +Bursa +copulatrix wide, oval, with two long, almost straight, basally wide and distally narrow signa. + + + + +Diagnosis. +In the female genitalia, the antrum shape of + +S. lasani + +is similar to + +Stenoptilia +aktashiensis + +, Gibeaux, 1997. These species differ from each other by the shorter ductus bursae that is bent at right angle in relation to the antrum, and also by the large oval bursa copulatrix in + +S. lasani + +, while in +S. aktashiensis +the ductus bursae is long, slightly bent, and the bursa is round. In the male genitalia, + +S. lasani + +is also similar to +S. aktashiensis +by similar shape of the cucullus and by the strongly bent phallus. Unlike in +S. aktashiensis +, the uncus extends beyond the posterior edge of tegumen in + +S. lasani + +. The uncus is also narrower in + +S. lasani + +than in +S. aktashiensis. +The wings of + +S. lasani + +are brown-grey, unlike +S. aktashiensis, +whose wings are noticeably paler. In external characters, the new species is similar to + +S. veronicae +Karvonen, 1932 + +, but differs by the predominance of grey color in the wings, while in + +S. veronicae + +the wings are dark brown. + + +Flight period +: June. + + + + +Distribution: +Russia +: +Tuva +. + + + + +Etymology +: The new species is named after Mojmir Lasan from +Ljubljana +, a prominent specialist in entomology in +Slovenia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DE85BFAC3FC75.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DE85BFAC3FC75.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fa0820a48fe --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DE85BFAC3FC75.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +StenoPtilia stigmatodactyla +(Zeller, 1852) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♀ (CUK), Tere-Khol', +15.vii.2000 +, O. Kosterin. + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, Transcaucasia, +Iran +, +Kazakhstan +, South Siberia, Yakutia, +Magadan +region. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DE972FCBAFD5B.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DE972FCBAFD5B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0c5ee62a256 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DE972FCBAFD5B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +StenoPtilia Pneumonantes +(Büttner, 1880) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. +1 ♀ +( +CUK +), Ular, +12.vii.2000 +, O. Kosterin. +Distribution. +Europe, +Kazakhstan +, NW +China +, South Siberia. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DEA89FD7FFDA3.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DEA89FD7FFDA3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..26f3f7bf2e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DEA89FD7FFDA3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +StenoPtilia nurolhaki +Amsel, 1967 + + + + + + + +Material examined +. +4 ♂ +( +CRS +, +CUK +), Khandagaity, +22.vi.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. +Distribution. +Afghanistan +, +Mongolia +, +Tuva +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DEB83FB6AFE88.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DEB83FB6AFE88.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..404c60ce271 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DEB83FB6AFE88.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +StenoPtilia nolckeni +(Tengstrom, 1869) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♂ (ZISP), Tes-Chem, +21.–30.vi.1969 +, Yu. Kostyuk; 1 ♂ (CUK), Durgen, +19.vii.1986 +; 1 ♂ (CUK), Sosnovka, +7.viii.1986 +; 3 ex. (CUK), Samagaltai, +22.–24.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin. + + + + +Distribution. +North Europe, +Kazakhstan +, Middle Asia, Siberia, Russian Far East, +Korea +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DEF0DFCAFFB57.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DEF0DFCAFFB57.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..837c94fb678 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C654FFEBFF0DEF0DFCAFFB57.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +StenoPtilia veronicae +Karvonen, 1932 + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 42 ex. (CUK), Mugur-Aksy (West), +1.–3.vii.2001 +; 1 ♂ (CUK), Samagaltai, +22.–24.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 1 ♀ (CUK), Kadysh, +30.vii.2004 +, O. Kosterin; 7 ex. (CRS), Khovu-Aksu, +10.–11.vii.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, Polar Ural, Siberia, Russian Far East. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DE8B7FE7EFB2D.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DE8B7FE7EFB2D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1f7d71c78d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DE8B7FE7EFB2D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +StenoPtilia +biPunctidactyla + +(Scopoli, 1763) + + + + + + +Material examined +. 2 ♂ (CUK), Samagaltai, +13.–14.vii.1993 +, A. Barkalov; 1 ♂ (ZISP), Khol’-Oozhu, +7.vii.1968 +, Yu. Kostyuk; 1 ♀ (CUK), Khanmalyg, +3.–4.vii.2004 +, O. Kosterin; 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (CRS), Bai-Khaak, +12.–13.vii.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, North Africa, +Western +Asia, +Iran +, Polar Ural, southern Siberia, +Mongolia +, Russian Far East (southern Primorye). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DE9CEFB9CFCE1.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DE9CEFB9CFCE1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..21b8ea0cc94 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DE9CEFB9CFCE1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +StenoPtilia annadactyla +Sutter, 1988 + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♀ (CUK), Chaiyrakan, +2.vi.2010 +, R. Yakovlev. + + + + +Distribution. +Temperate Europe, +Armenia +, +Orenburg +region, +Omsk +region, +Tuva +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEA89FD2CFD34.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEA89FD2CFD34.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..70584e905a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEA89FD2CFD34.xml @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +AmblyPtilia Punctidactyla +Haworth, 1811 + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♀ (CUK), Shuurmak riv., +16.vi.2001 +; 1 ♀ (CUK), Shuurmak vill., +17.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 2 ♂, 1 ♀ (CUK), Unzhei, +21.–27.vi.2005 +; 1 ♂ (CUK), Ak-Chem, +17.vi.2008 +, R. Dudko; 1 ♀ (CUK), Chagatai, +10.vii.2007 +, V. Zachozhev; 1 ♂ (ZISP), Seserlig, +17.vii.1968 +, Yu. Kostyuk; 1 ♂ (CUK), Khanmalyg, +3.– 4.vii.2004 +, O. Kosterin; 4 ex. (CUK), U-Shynaa, +23.vi.2002 +, R. Yakovlev. + + + + +Distribution. +Temperate zone of the Palaearctic. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEB83FC59FE89.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEB83FC59FE89.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..348a5bfb10e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEB83FC59FE89.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +ParaPlatyPtilia terminalis +(Erschoff, 1877) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (CUK), Mongun-Taiga, +24.vi.1968 +; 2 ♂ (ZISP), Tes-Chem, +26.vi.1969 +, Yu. Kostyuk; 1 ♂ (CUK), Shuurmak vill., +17.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; + +1 ♂ +( +CUK +), Sush', + +17.vi.2002 + +, + +R. Yakovlev. +Distribution. +Siberia + +, NE +China +, Russian Far East ( +Kamchatka +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEDFFFA5CF865.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEDFFFA5CF865.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..921848048b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEDFFFA5CF865.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +StenoPtilia latistriga +Rebel, 1916 + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 5 ex. (ZISP), Chundurgun, +9.vii.1969 +, Yu. Kostyuk; 1 ♂ (CUK), Argalyg-Kozhagar, +27.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 9 ex. (CUK), Chondergei, +28.–29.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin & R. Yakovlev; 4 ♂, 1 ♀ (CUK), U-Shynaa, +23.vi.2002 +, R. Yakovlev; 1 ♂ (CUK), Khandagaity, +4.vii.2005 +, R. Yakovlev; 1 ♂ (CRS), Barlyk, +24.–26.vi.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. + + + + +Distribution. +The mountains of Siberia: +Altai +, Tannu-Ola, Sayan, Khamar-Daban, +Buryatia +, +Irkutsk Province +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEEF2FC83F926.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEEF2FC83F926.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3e9bbba0025 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEEF2FC83F926.xml @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +StenoPtilia +graPhodactyla + +(Treitschke, 1833) + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♂ (CUK), Dus-Dag, +26.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 1 ♂, Shuurmak vill., +17.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin. + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, Siberia, +China +( +Shanxi +, +Xinjiang +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEFF5FB8AFA20.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEFF5FB8AFA20.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3f5efa9d0ee --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C655FFEAFF0DEFF5FB8AFA20.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +StenoPtilia +coProdactyla + +(Stainton, 1851) + + + + + + +Material examined +. 8 ex. (ZISP, CUK), Tes-Chem, +21.–30.vi.1969 +, Yu. Kostyuk; 1 ♂,1 ♀ (CUK), Samagaltai, +13.–14.vii.1993 +, A. Barkalov; + +1 ♀ +(CRS), Khovu-Aksu, + +10.–11.vii.2004 + +, +J. Hron +, +M. Cesanek +& + +J. Rekelj. +Distribution. +Europe + +, +Asia Minor +, the +Caucasus +, +Middle Asia +, +southern Siberia + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C656FFE9FF0DEC57FE11F842.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C656FFE9FF0DEC57FE11F842.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ef4e792cfcf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C656FFE9FF0DEC57FE11F842.xml @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +CnaemidoPhorus rhododactylus + +([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775) + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♀ (CUK), Azas, +21.–22.vii.2000 +, O. Kosterin; 5 ex. (CRS, CUK), Bai-Khaak, +12.– 13.vii.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. + + + + +Distribution. +Holarctic. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DE8EEFAA6FBCE.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DE8EEFAA6FBCE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6bd69407500 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DE8EEFAA6FBCE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +Hellinsia distinctа +(Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 4 ♂, 1 ♀ (CUK), Mugur-Aksy (West), +1.–3.vii.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin. + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, +Armenia +, Middle Asia, Siberia, Russian Far East, +Japan +, +China +( +Jilin +, Manchuria). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DE9E1FE57FC17.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DE9E1FE57FC17.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3e5446c33a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DE9E1FE57FC17.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +OxyPtilus chrysodactylus + +([Denis et Schiffermüller], 1775) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. +1 ♂ +( +ZISP +), Tes-Chem, + +24.vii.1969 + +, + +Yu. Kostyuk. +Distribution. +Europe + +, the Caucasus, Siberia, Russian Far East ( +Priamurye +, +Primorye +, +Sakhalin +), +China +( +Heilongjiang +), +Japan + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DEA6BFC40FD11.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DEA6BFC40FD11.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e5ceee70d46 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DEA6BFC40FD11.xml @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +CaPPeria trichodactyla + +([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. +1 ♂ +( +ZISP +), +Shara-Sur +, + +28.vii.1969 + +, +Yu. Kostyuk + +; + +1 ♂ +( +CUK +), +Durgen +, + +3.viii.1986 + +, P. +Ustjuzhanin + +; + +1 ♂ +( +CUK +), +Samagaltai +, + +13.–14.vii.1993 + +, A. +Barkalov + +; + +1 ♂ +( +CUK +), +Kyzyl +, + +19.viii.1989 + +, D. +Logunov + +; + +1 ♀ +( +CUK +), +Shagonar +, + +11.viii.2010 + +, +R. Yakovlev +; 24 ex. ( +CUK +), +Khanmalyg +, + +3.–4.vii.2004 + +, O. +Kosterin +; 18 ex. ( +CUK +), +Boom Mt. + +, + + +28.vi.2004 + +, +O. Kosterin +; 3 ex. ( +CUK +), +Khemchik +, + +30.vi.2004 + +, O. +Kosterin + +; + +1 ♂ +( +CUK +), +Kyzyl +, + +3.viii.2004 + +, O. +Kosterin + +; + +1 ♀ +( +CUK +), +Tere-Khol' +, + +18.–19.vi.2001 + +, P. +Ustjuzhanin + +; + +1 ♀ +(CRS), +Bai-Khaak +, + +12.– 13.vii.2004 + +, J. +Hron +, M. +Cesanek +& J. +Rekelj. + + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, Siberia, Russian Far East, +Japan +, +China +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DEC12FC61F819.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DEC12FC61F819.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aa182ee7d88 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DEC12FC61F819.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +Hellinsia osteodactylus +(Zeller, 1841) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♂ (CUK), Samagaltai, +22.–24.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin. + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, the Caucasus, +Kazakhstan +, Middle Asia, Siberia, Russian Far East, +Mongolia +, +China +( +Heilongjiang +, +Shandong +, +Shanxi +, +Xinjiang +, +Yunnan +, +Ningxia +), +Japan +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DED15FBC5F900.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DED15FBC5F900.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1c98d4dcbcf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DED15FBC5F900.xml @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +Hellinsia mongolicа +(Zagulajev et Pentshukovskaja, 1972) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♂ (CUK), Azas, +11.vi.1988 +, V. Zinchenko; 1 ♀ (CUK), Kyzyl, +14.–15.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 1 ♂ (CUK), Khanmalyg, +3.–4.vii.2004 +, O. Kosterin. + + + + +Distribution. +The mountains of South Siberia, +Mongolia +, Yakutia, +China +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DEFD7FC79FA21.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DEFD7FC79FA21.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e649d06c8d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C658FFE7FF0DEFD7FC79FA21.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +Hellinsia inulae +(Zeller, 1852) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♂ (CUK), Kyzyl, +18.viii.1989 +, D. Logunov; 1 ♂ (ZISP) Tes-Chem, +24.vii.1969 +, Yu. Kostyuk. 1 ♂ (CUK), Shuurmak riv., +16.vi.2001 +; 1 ♂ (CUK), Tere-Khol', +18.–19.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 8 ex. (CRS), +17.vi.2002 +, Sush', R. Yakovlev; Shuurmak, +02.vi.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, N. Africa, +Kazakhstan +, Middle Asia, Siberia. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C659FFE6FF0DED8BFCEBF8A2.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C659FFE6FF0DED8BFCEBF8A2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..84a448e5939 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C659FFE6FF0DED8BFCEBF8A2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +Marasmarcha lydia +Ustjuzhanin, 1996 + + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 # ( +ZISP +), Shara-Sur, + +29.vii.1969 + +, Yu. Kostyuk. +Distribution. +Buryatia, Tuva +, +Mongolia +, +Amur Valley + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C659FFE7FF0DEC7CFECDFEAB.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C659FFE7FF0DEC7CFECDFEAB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9369ffa17d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C659FFE7FF0DEC7CFECDFEAB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +ProcaPPeria kuldschaensis +(Rebel,1914) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 2 ♂, 2 ♀ (CUK), Kyzyl, +5.vi.1989 +, V. Zinchenko & D. Logunov; 1 ♀ (CUK), Khol’-Oozhu, +15.–17.vii.1993 +, A. Barkalov; 1 ♂ (ZISP), Ak-Chira, +13.vi.1968 +, Yu. Kostyuk; 6 ex. (CRS), Ondum, +12.vi.2004 +, J. + + + +Hron, M. +Cesanek & J. Rekelj; 1 ♂ (CRS), Khandagaity, 22.vi. +2004 +, +J. Hron, M.Cesanek & J. Rekelj; 1 ♂ (CUK) +, +Barlyk +, +26 +.vi. +2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. + + + + + +Distribution. +Kazakhstan +, Middle Asia, South Siberia ( +Altai +, +Kemerovo +Prov., +Tuva +), +Mongolia +, +China +(Xinjang). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DE806FBDBFBBB.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DE806FBDBFBBB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c636c440157 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DE806FBDBFBBB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +Emmelina monodactyla +(Linnaeus, 1758) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♂ (CUK), Durgen, +14.vii.1986 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 2 ♀ (CUK), Kyzyl, +26.vii.1989 +, D. Logunov; 70 ex. (CUK), Kyzyl, +15.–26.v.1990 +, V. Dubatolov; 9 ex. (CUK), Khol’-Oozhu, +15.–17.vii.1993 +, D. Logunov & A. Barkalov; 1 ♀ (CRS), Ondum, +12.vi.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. + + + + +Distribution. +Europe, North Africa, the Caucasus, +Kazakhstan +, Middle Asia, southern Siberia, extends to the East up to +Tuva +; +Mongolia +, +China +, +India +, +Philippines +, North and South America. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DEAC1FB9BFD7C.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DEAC1FB9BFD7C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a454e603748 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DEAC1FB9BFD7C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +TabulaePhorus +marPtys + +(Christoph, 1873) + + + + + + +Material examined +. 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (CUK), Kyzyl, +14.–15.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 1 ♂ (CRS), Moren, +4.–5.vi.2004 +, J.Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj; 3 ♂ (CRS, CUK), Ondum, +12.vi.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj; 1 ♂ (CUK), 1 ♀, Dus Dag, +19.vi.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj; 2 ♂ (CRS), Barlyk, +26.vi.2004 +, J. Hron, M. Cesanek & J. Rekelj. + + + + +Distribution. +South European +Russia +, +Kazakhstan +, +Altai +, +Tuva +, +Mongolia +, +China +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DEB83FA4EFE31.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DEB83FA4EFE31.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2cb5155d1cb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DEB83FA4EFE31.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +Merrifieldia leucodactyla + +([Denis et Schiffermüller], 1775) + + + + + + +Material examined +. 3 ex. (CUK), Sosnovka, +19.–21.vii.1986 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 1 ♀ (CUK), Toora-Khem, +20.vii.2000 +, O. Kosterin & N. Priidak; 1 ♂ (CUK), Erzin, +18.vi.2001 +; 1 ♂ (CUK), Mugur-Aksy (West), +30.vi.2001 +, P. Ustjuzhanin; 3 ♂ (CUK), Khanmalyg, +3.–4.vii.2004 +, O. Kosterin; 5 ex., Izvestkovoe, +20.vii.2004 +, O. Kosterin; 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (CUK), Chirgalandy, +26.–30.vi.2004 +, R. Dudko. + + + + +Distribution. +North Africa, Europe, +Armenia +, +Kazakhstan +, Middle Asia, Siberia, +China +( +Shanxi +), +Mongolia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DEE2DFC0FFA0C.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DEE2DFC0FFA0C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..052763850b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DEE2DFC0FFA0C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +Oirata Poculidactyla +(K. Nupponen et T. Nupponen, 2001) + + + + + + + +Material examined +. +1 ♂ +( +ZISP +), Hindiktig-Khol, +13.vii.1969 +, Yu. Kostyuk. +Distribution. +SE +Altai +, SW +Tuva +, +Mongolia +(Bayan-Ulegei Aimak). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DEF7BFD8BFB54.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DEF7BFD8BFB54.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..57c6ea65881 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F1C65BFFE4FF0DEF7BFD8BFB54.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Pterophoridae (Lepidoptera) fauna of the Republic of Tuva + + + +Author + +Ustjuzhanina, Anna + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-12-12 + + +4319 + + +2 + + +317 +328 + + + +journal article +32129 +10.11646/zootaxa.4319.2.3 +23905003-5ee5-4326-b1bb-3a2fd6250df3 +1175-5326 +889135 +20834F8F-90Eb-4C84-B1E7-1880Fecfdc9A + + + + + + + +SePtuaginta zagulajevi +Ustjuzhanin, 1996 + + + + + + + + +Material examined +. +1 ♂ +( +ZISP +), Hindiktig-Khol, + +13.vii.1969 + +, + +Yu. Kostyuk. +Distribution. +Transbaikalia + +, +Tuva +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5C/87/375C87F57136E135769EFF7B2D9F1ED6.xml b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F57136E135769EFF7B2D9F1ED6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f9bc4e82b47 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5C/87/375C87F57136E135769EFF7B2D9F1ED6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,988 @@ + + + +A new species of Hemiphyllodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Tuyen Quang Province, Vietnam + + + +Author + +Do, Quyen Hanh +0000-0002-9437-4673 +Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 334 Nguyen Trai Road, Hanoi, Vietnam. Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet Road, Hanoi, Vietnam. Central Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 19 Le Thanh Tong, Hanoi, Vietnam. le. duc. minh @ hus. edu. vn; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 2953 - 2815 & quyendo. k 59 @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 9437 - 4673 +quyendo.k59@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Pham, Cuong The +0000-0001-5158-4526 +cuongiebr @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5158 - 4526 +cuongiebr@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Phan, Tien Quang + + + +Author + +Le, Minh Duc +0000-0002-2953-2815 +Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 334 Nguyen Trai Road, Hanoi, Vietnam. Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet Road, Hanoi, Vietnam. Central Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 19 Le Thanh Tong, Hanoi, Vietnam. le. duc. minh @ hus. edu. vn; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 2953 - 2815 & Department of Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79 th Street, New York, New York 10024. AG Zoologischer Garten Köln, Riehler Strasse 173, D- 50735 Cologne, Germany. +le.duc.minh@hus.edu.vn + + + +Author + +Ziegler, Thomas +Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Zülpicher Street 47 b, D- 50674 Cologne, Germany. + + + +Author + +Nguyen, Truong Quang +Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet Road, Hanoi, Vietnam. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2020 + +2020-08-03 + + +4821 + + +3 + + +511 +532 + + + +journal article +8772 +10.11646/zootaxa.4821.3.5 +fb2cf0ca-f75b-4f80-a113-d1febae51c17 +1175-5326 +4401075 +4017C2A0-6B33-4D9C-BEDF-4D96AC902893 + + + + + + + +Hemiphyllodactylus nahangensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 3 +, +4 +) + + + + + + +Holotype +. + +IEBR 4741 +(Field number TQ.2018.140), adult male, collected on + +20 June 2018 + +by C. +T +. +Pham, A.M +. Luong, +T +. +Q. Phan +and H. +T +. +Ninh +from the limestone karst area near +Trung Phin Village +( + +20 +o +30.215’N + +, + +105 +o +23.402’E + +, at an elevation of + +915 m +a.s.l. + +), +Sinh Long Commune +, +Na Hang District +, +Tuyen Quang Province +, northern +Vietnam +. + + + + + +Paratypes +. + +Two specimens collected from the same site as the +holotype +: +IEBR 4742 +(Field number TQ.2018.141), adult male, collected on + +20 June 2018 + +and +IEBR 4743 +(Field number TQ.2018.96), adult female, collected on + +18 June 2018 + +, by C. +T +. +Pham, A.M +. Luong, +T +. +Q. Phan +and H. +T +. +Ninh + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +The new species from northern +Vietnam +differs from the remaining congeners of the genus + +Hemiphyllodactylus + +by a combination of the following characters: a bisexual taxon; SVL of adults +41.4–43.6 mm +; dorsal scale rows 18–23; ventral scale rows 9–13; chin scales bordering mental and first infralabial, distinctly enlarged; digital lamellae formula 3-4-5-4 (forefoot) and 4-5-5-5 (hindfoot); 22–24 pore-bearing femoral and precloacal scales, in a continuous row, absent in females; cloacal spur single in both sexes; dark lateral head stripe indistinct; postsacral mark cream and bearing anteriorly projecting arms. + + + + + +Description of +holotype +. + +Adult male; size small (SVL +43.6 mm +); tail length (TaL +37.4 mm +); body elongate (TrunkL +21.3 mm +); head longer than wide (HeadL +10.7 mm +, HeadW +7.4 mm +), not markedly depressed (HeadD/ HeadL 0.34), distinct from neck; eye large, pupils vertical (EyeD +2.5 mm +); ear oval shaped, small (EarD +0.69 mm +); nare–eye length (NarEye +3.1 mm +), snout-eye length (SnEye +3.8 mm +), internarial distance (SnW +1.3 mm +). Proportions: Trunk/SVL 0.44, HeadL/SVL 0.24, HeadW/SVL 0.17, HeadW/HeadL 0.69, HeadD/HeadL 0.34, SnEye/HeadL 0.36, NarEye/HeadL 0.29, EyeD/HeadL 0.24, EyeD/SnEye 0.67, EyeEar/EyeD 1.39, SnW/HeadL 0.12, EyeD/NarEye 0.82, SnW/HeadW 0.18. + + +Scalation: Rostral very large, wider than high, with a shallow suture, bordered posteriorly by large supranasals; supralabials 11/11, gradually decreased in size towards angle of jaw; nare in contact with rostral anteriorly, first supralabial ventrally, supranasal dorsally and three nasals posteriorly on each side; supranasals separated from each other by four small granular internasals; snout flat; pupil vertical, upper eyelid with small supraciliaries; ear oval-shaped, approximately 27% of the eye diameter, not bordered by enlarged scales; infralabials 10/9; mental triangular, slightly wider than rostral, bordered by the first infralabial on each side and posteriorly by two enlarged postmentals; eight chin scales touching internal edge of infralabials and mental between the juncture of the second and third infralabials on each side of the head, anterior pair enlarged; gular scales small, subimbricate; throat and pectoral scales which grade into slightly larger, subimbricate; dorsal scales small, granular, in 22 rows at midbody (contained within one eye diameter); ventrolateral folds absent; enlarged turbercles absent; ventral scales flat, subcircular, larger than dorsal scales, in 9 rows at midbody on venter (contained within one eye diameter); femoral pores and precloacal pores in continuous series, +24 in +total; cloacal spur single; dorsal surface of fore and hindlimbs covered with granular scales; terminal two phalanges free, claws absent on first finger and on first toe, present on second to fifth digit of fore and hindfoot; pads of digits II–V each with large triangular lamella, digital formula 3-4-5-4 (forefoot) and 4-5-5-5 (hindfoot); lamellae three on first fingers, three on first toes; caudal scales flat, not forming distinct caudal segments. + +Coloration in life: Ground color of dorsum, head and limbs grey with indistinct black markings; dark lateral head stripe indistinct; light postorbital stripe extending to anterior margin of forearm; ventral surface cream with dark mottling; dorsum with indistinct dark pattern, upper zone of flank with light spots and indistinct dark longitudinal markings; postsacral mark cream in U-shape and bearing anteriorly projecting arms; original tail with some dark spots, edged by light grey and cream markings. +Coloration in preservative: Color became darker, dark pattern disappeared on dorsum, head and dorsal surface of limbs. Tail pattern did not change noticeably in preservation. + +Sexual dimorphism and variation. +Measurements and scalation characters of the +paratypes +are given in +Table 2 +. The female differs from the males in the absence of hemipenial swellings at the tail base. The scale counts vary among the type series: scales between supranasals 4–6; supralabials 10–12; infralabials 9–11; chin scales 8 or 9; dorsal scale rows 18–23; ventral scale rows 9–13. The males have 22–24 femoral and precloacal pores (versus absent in female). Ground color on upper surface of head, body, and tail is also different among individuals, varying from whitish grey to brownish grey with yellowish marks. + + + + +TABLE 2 +. Morphological characters of the type series of + +Hemiphyllodactylus nahangensis + + +sp. nov. + +from Tuyen Quang Province, Vietnam (measurements in mm, Min = minimum, Max = maximum). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CharacterIEBR 4741 (TQ.2018.140)IEBR 4742 (TQ.2018.141)IEBR 4743 (TQ.2018.96)Min–Max
HolotypeParatypeParatype
Sexmalemalefemale
SVL43.5843.4541.4441.44–43.58
TaL37.3536.3632.1332.13–37.35
TrunkL21.2921.2720.8920.89–21.29
EyeD2.532.612.682.53–2.68
HeadL10.6510.229.969.96–10.65
HeadW7.367.096.876.87–7.36
NarEye3.073.152.812.81–3.15
SnEye3.814.023.543.54–4.02
SnW1.331.120.960.96–1.33
EarD0.690.550.790.55–0.79
Trunk/SVL0.490.490.500.49–0.50
HeadL/SVL0.240.240.240.24
HeadW/SVL0.170.160.170.16–0.17
HeadW/HeadL0.690.690.690.69
SnEye/HeadL0.360.390.360.36–0.39
NarEye/HeadL0.290.310.280.28–0.31
EyeD/HeadL0.240.260.270.24–0.27
SnW/HeadL0.120.110.100.10–0.12
EyeD/NarEye0.820.830.950.82–0.95
SnW/HeadW0.180.160.140.14–0.18
Dorsal scale rows22182318–23
Ventral scale rows99139–13
Cloacal spurs (CloacS)1111
Circumnasal (CircN)3/32/33/32–3
Scales between supranasals (SnS)4644–6
Supralabials (Sublab)11/1111/1212/1010–12
Infralabials (Inflab)10/911/1011/109–11
Chin scale (Chin)8898–9
Lamella formula of
forelimbs (pairs only)3-4-5-43-4-5-43-4-5-43-4-5-4
hindlimbs (pairs only)4-5-5-54-5-5-54-5-5-54-5-5-5
First digit of
forelimbs3333
hindlimbs3333
Pores2422022–24 (in males)
Subcaudals enlarged, plate-like (1) or not (0)0000
+ + + +Distribution. + +Hemiphyllodactylus nahangensis + + +sp. nov. + +is currently known only from the +type +locality in Na Hang District, +Tuyen Quang Province +, northern +Vietnam +( +Fig.1 +). + + + + +Etymology. +Specific epithet + +nahangensis + +is a toponym in reference to the +type +locality of the species. For the common names we suggest Nahang Slender Gecko (English) and Thạch sùng dẹp na hang (Vietnamese). + + +Natural history. +The new species is associated with residential habitat. +Type +specimens were collected between 20:00 and 22:00 h, one individual was collected on the wooden wall of a house in Trung Phin Village, two individuals were collected on a branch of a peach tree near the house, approximately +2.5–3.5 m +above the ground. The surrounding habitat of Trung Phin village was disturbed evergreen karst forest of medium, small hardwood and shrub trees. Air temperature ranged from 25ºC to 31ºC and relative humidity was 63–87%. + + +Comparisons: +We compared the new species from northern +Vietnam +with all other members of the genus + +Hemiphyllodactylus + +from +Vietnam +, +Laos +, and +China +based on examination of specimens (see Appendix) and data obtained from the literature ( +Boulenger 1903 +; +Barbour 1924 +; +Smith 1935 +; +Taylor 1963 +; + +Zhou +et al +. 1981 + +with English translation of Ota 1996; +Bourret 2009 +; +Zug 2010 +; + +Grismer +et al. +2013 + +, +2014a +,b, 2015, 2018a,b, 2020; + +Nguyen +et al +. 2013 + +, +2014 +, +2020 +; + +Ngo +et al. +2014 + +; + +Guo +et al +. 2015 + +; + +Cobos +et al +. 2016 + +; + +Yan +et al +. 2016 + +; + +Sukprasert +et al +. 2018 + +; Sung +et al. +2018; + +Eliades +et al +. 2019 + +; + +Agarwal +et al +. 2019 + +, +2020 +). For comparisons with other species of + +Hemiphyllodactylus + +see +Table 3 +. + + + +Hemiphyllodactylus nahangensis + + +sp. nov. + +differs from + +H. banaensis +Ngo, Grismer, Pham & Wood + +by having a smaller size (maximum SVL +43.6 mm +versus +51 mm +in + +H. banaensis + +), fewer subdigital lamellae 3 (1FingLm) and 3 (1ToeLm) ( +versus +5 and 5, respectively, in + +H. banaensis + +), and more precloacal and femoral pores in males (22–24 +versus +18–21 in + +H. banaensis + +); from + +H. bonkowskii + +by having more chin scales (8–9 +versus +5–7 in + +H. bonkowskii + +), fewer dorsal scale rows (18–23 +versus +24–27 in + +H. bonkowskii + +), fewer subdigital lamellae 3 (1FingLm) and 3 (1ToeLm) ( +versus +5 and 4–5, respectively, in + +H. bonkowskii + +), digital lamellae formula 3-4-5-4 (forefoot) and 4-5-5- 5 (hindfoot) ( +versus +3-4-4-4 and 4-5-5-4, respectively, in + +H. bonkowskii + +), and more precloacal and femoral pores in males (22–24 +versus +19 in + +H. bonkowskii + +); from + +H. dushanensis + +by having a smaller size (maximum SVL +43.6 mm +versus +50.6 mm +in + +H. dushanensis + +), more dorsal scale rows (18–23 +versus +11–15 in + +H. dushanensis + +), fewer subdigital lamellae 3 (1FingLm) and 3 (1ToeLm) ( +versus +4–5 and 5–6, respectively, in + +H. dushanensis + +), and the presence of anteriorly projecting arms on postsacral ( +versus +absent in + +H. dushanensis + +); from + +H. hongkongensis + +by having more chin scales (8–9 +versus +5–6 in + +H. hongkongensis + +), more dorsal scale rows (18–23 +versus +12–15 in + +H. hongkongensis + +), fewer subdigital lamellae 3 (1ToeLm) ( +versus +5 in + +H. hongkongensis + +), digital lamellae formula 3-4-5-4 (forefoot) and 4-5-5-5 (hindfoot) ( +versus +3-4-4-4/3-3-4-4 and 3-4-4-4/4-4-5-4/4-4-5-5, respectively, in + +H. hongkongensis + +); from + +H. huishuiensis +Yan, Lin, Guo, Li & Zhou + +by having more scales between supranasals (4–6 +versus +2–3 in + +H. huishuiensis + +), more dorsal scale rows (18–23 +versus +13–15 in + +H. huishuiensis + +), more ventral scale rows (9–13 +versus +7–9 in + +H. huishuiensis + +), and more precloacal and femoral pores in males (22–24 +versus +18–20 in + +H. huishuiensis + +); from + +H. indosobrinus +Eliades, Phimmachak, Sivongxay, Siler & Stuart + +by having more scales between supranasals (4–6 +versus +3 in + +H. indosobrinus + +), fewer supralabials (10–12 +versus +15 in + +H. indosobrinus + +), fewer dorsal scale rows (18–23 +versus +30 in + +H. indosobrinus + +), fewer subdigital lamellae 3 (1FingLm) and 3 (1ToeLm) ( +versus +4 and 5, respectively, in + +H. indosobrinus + +), and more precloacal and femoral pores in males (22–24 +versus +18 in + +H. indosobrinus + +); from + +H. kiziriani + +by having more scales between supranasals (4–6 +versus +2–3 in + +H. kiziriani + +), fewer subdigital lamellae 3 (1FingLm) and 3 (1ToeLm) ( +versus +5 and 5, respectively, in + +H. kiziriani + +), digital lamellae formula 3454 (forefoot) and 4-5-5-5 (hindfoot) ( +versus +3-4-4-4 and 4-4(5)-4(5)-4, respectively, in + +H. kiziriani + +), and more precloacal and femoral pores in males (22–24 +versus +10–13 in + +H. kiziriani + +); from + +H. ngocsonensis + +by having more scales between supranasals (4–6 +versus +3 in + +H. ngocsonensis + +), fewer subdigital lamellae 3 (1FingLm) and 3 (1ToeLm) ( +versus +4–5 and 5–6, respectively, in + +H. ngocsonensis + +), digital lamellae formula 3454 (forefoot) and 4555 (hindfoot) ( +versus +3-4-4-4 and 4-5-5-4, respectively, in + +H. ngocsonensis + +), and more precloacal and femoral pores in males (22–24 +versus +20 in + +H. ngocsonensis + +); from + +H. serpispecus + +by having more scales between supranasals (4–6 +versus +2 in + +H. serpispecus + +), fewer dorsal scale rows (18–23 +versus +26 in + +H. serpispecus + +), fewer subdigital lamellae 3 (1FingLm) and 3 (1ToeLm) ( +versus +4 and 4, respectively, in + +H. serpispecus + +), digital lamellae formula 3-4-5-4 (forefoot) and 4-5-5-5 (hindfoot) ( +versus +3-4-4-4 and 3-4-4-5, respectively, in + +H. serpispecus + +), and more precloacal and femoral pores in males (22–24 +versus +11 in + +H. serpispecus + +); from + +H. zugi +Nguyen, Lehmann, Le, Duong, Bonkowski & Ziegler + +by having fewer ventral scales (9–13 +versus +14–16 in + +H. zugi + +), fewer subdigital lamellae 3 (1FingLm) and 3 (1ToeLm) ( +versus +4–5 and 4–5, respectively, in + +H. zugi + +), digital lamellae formula 3-4-5-4 (forefoot) ( +versus +3-4-4- +4 in + +H. zugi + +), and more precloacal and femoral pores in males (22–24 +versus +18–21 in + +H. zugi + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5D/20/375D201A4544774FA4A7977F0884719C.xml b/data/37/5D/20/375D201A4544774FA4A7977F0884719C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cf04b68280f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5D/20/375D201A4544774FA4A7977F0884719C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ + + + +An annotated checklist of the scale insects of Iran (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha, Coccoidea) with new records and distribution data + + + +Author + +Moghaddam, Masumeh + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +334 + + +1 +92 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.334.5818 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.334.5818 +1313-2970-334-1 + + + + +* +Eriococcus sanguinairensis Goux + + + + +Eriococcus sanguinairensis +Goux, 1993: 68-69. + + + +Iran localities. +Ardabil. + + +Host plants. +Unknown plant. + + +Note. + +This is the first record of +Eriococcus sanguinairensis +in Iran, identified by F. +Kozar +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5D/22/375D227B87025657D7A41A3BB98463C8.xml b/data/37/5D/22/375D227B87025657D7A41A3BB98463C8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8213f70c97d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5D/22/375D227B87025657D7A41A3BB98463C8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828--8013 + + + + +Aprostocetus (Aprostocetus) cultratus Graham, 1987 + + + +Distribution +England + + +Notes +Added by Graham (1987) + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5D/3A/375D3AFCE65EBDA32D7E07BCCF0BDB8F.xml b/data/37/5D/3A/375D3AFCE65EBDA32D7E07BCCF0BDB8F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9a1c84537f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5D/3A/375D3AFCE65EBDA32D7E07BCCF0BDB8F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,300 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Rubiaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/rubiaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Galium pumilum + +aggr. + + + + +Art ISFS: 179650 Checklist: 1020595 +Rubiaceae +Galium +Galium pumilum +aggr. +Enthaelt +: +Galium anisophyllon Vill. +Galium pumilum Murray +Galium pusillum L. + + +Zusammenfassung +KEINE ANGABE + + + +Status Nationale +Prioritaet + +: -- + + +Internationale Verantwortung +: -- + + + +Oekologie + + + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + +KEINE ANGABE + + +
+
+ + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl L--Salzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl T--
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +--
+ + + + +Nomenklatur + + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Galium pumilum + + +aggr. + + + +Volksname + + + +Deutscher Name: -- Nom +francais +: -- Nome italiano: -- + + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Galium pumilum aggr. + + +Checklist 2017 + +179650
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Kommentare aus der +Checklist 2017 +Gegenueber +SISF-2 neu definiertes Aggregat. Checklist + + + + +Status Indigenat +: Indigen + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein Status Rote Liste national + + + + + + +
KEINE ANGABE
+ + + +Status nationale +Prioritaet +/Verantwortung + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ +Nationale +Prioritaet + +--
+Massnahmenbedarf +--
+ +Internationale Verantwortung + +--
+ +Ueberwachung +Bestaende + +--
+ +Schutzstatus + + + + + + +
Kein internationaler, nationaler oder kantonaler Schutz
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5D/9D/375D9D8133BA0C7BC4C435B1BE2621E2.xml b/data/37/5D/9D/375D9D8133BA0C7BC4C435B1BE2621E2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d0aafb21de9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5D/9D/375D9D8133BA0C7BC4C435B1BE2621E2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ + + + +A catalogue of the fishes held in the Istanbul University, Science Faculty, Hydrobiology Museum. + + + +Author + +Nurettin Meriç + + + +Author + +Lütfiye Eryilmaz + + + +Author + +Müfit Özulug + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2007 + +1472 + + +29 +54 + + + + +http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:428F3980-C1B8-45FF-812E-0F4847AF6786 + +journal article +z01472p029 + + + + +Atherina hepsetus Linnaeus, 1758 + + + + + +?: +8800-158 +(1 spc.); +8800-163 +(20 spa) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5D/C0/375DC007151F758BA5E7BF3FDA373DD8.xml b/data/37/5D/C0/375DC007151F758BA5E7BF3FDA373DD8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7866d1ff01 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5D/C0/375DC007151F758BA5E7BF3FDA373DD8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,284 @@ + + + +New species of semi-aquatic freshwater earthworm genus Glyphidrilus Horst, 1889 from Thailand and Laos (Oligochaeta, Almidae) + + + +Author + +Chanabun, Ratmanee + + + +Author + +Inkavilay, Khamla + + + +Author + +Panha, Somsak + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +672 + + +1 +34 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.672.10212 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.672.10212 +1313-2970-672-1 +48810F7697B940B29A75DB0F98C5311F +48810F7697B940B29A75DB0F98C5311F + + + + +Glyphidrilus chiangraiensis Chanabun & Panha +sp. n. +Figs 1, 6, 7, Table 1 + + + +Type material. + +Holotype: One adult (CUMZ 3407) in the river banks of Mekong River at Wat Hatkai, Chiangkhong, Chiangrai, north Thailand ( +20°15'8.5"N +, +100°24'46.8"E +), 384 meters elevation on 14 March 2014. Paratypes: 9 adults (CUMZ 3408), 2 adults (ZMH 14581), 2 adults (NHMUK), and 2 adults (ZRC), all specimens collected only from the type locality. + + + +Figure 6. Photographs showing the A +Glyphidrilus chiangraiensis +sp. n. and other earthworms casts B type locality of +G. chiangraiensis +sp. n. in the river banks of Mekong River at Wat Hatkai, Chiangkhong, Chiangrai, north Thailand, and C coloration of newly collected paratype (CUMZ 3408) after the first preservation step in 30% (v/v) ethanol. + + + + +Other material examined. + +43 adults (CUMZ 3409), in the river banks of Mekong River at Mueang, Buengkan, northeast Thailand ( +18°22'2.4"N +, +103°38'58.0"E +), 144 meters elevation on 6 December 2013. 33 adults (CUMZ 3410), in the river banks of Mekong River at Kang Kudku, Chiangkhan, Loei, northeast Thailand ( +17°54'24.5"N +, +101°42'7.5"E +), 195 meters elevation on 8 December 2013. 25 adults (CUMZ 3411), in the river banks of Mekong River at Wat Srisomsanook, Chiangkhan, Loei, northeast Thailand ( +17°59'25.4"N +, +101°44'51.3"E +), 212 meters elevation on 7 December +2013 +. 11 adults (CUMZ 3412), in the river banks of Mekong River at Wat Hadphatum, Srichiangmai, Nongkhai, northeast Thailand ( +17°57'32.2"N +, +102°35'26.8"E +), 174 meters elevation on 7 December 2013. 38 adults (CUMZ 3413), in the river banks of Mekong River at Wat Jomnang, Phonphisai, Nongkhai, northeast Thailand ( +18°01'53.6"N +, +103°4'47.4"E +), 165 meters elevation on 6 December 2013. 30 adults (CUMZ 3414), in the river banks of Mekong River at Wat Prayanakmai, Wiangkaen, Chiangrai, north Thailand ( +20°11'45.2"N +, +100°27'32.0"E +), 359 meters elevation on 15 March 2014. 19 adults (CUMZ 3415), in the river banks of Mekong River at Wat Bansaw, Chiangsan, Chiangrai, north Thailand ( +20°15'19.4"N +, +100°10'44.9"E +), 385 meters elevation on 14 March 2014. 26 adults (CUMZ 3416), in river banks of Mekong River at Ban Rimkhong, Pakchom, Loei, northeast Thailand ( +18°12'48.9"N +, +102°04'52.2"E +), 181 meters elevation on 8 December 2013. 3 adults (CUMZ 3417), in river banks of Mekong River, Mueng Paksay, Chaiyaburi, Laos ( +18°12'40.0"N +, +101°24'28.1"E +), 214 meters elevation on 15 April 2014. 15 adults (CUMZ 3418) in river banks of Mekong River, Bandon, Luangprabang, Laos ( +19°55'27.6"N +, +102°10'49.7"E +), 304 meters elevation on 14 April 2014. 24 adults (CUMZ 3419) in river banks of Mekong River, between Sanakham to Vientiane, Laos ( +17°57'39.7"N +, +101°43'53.8"E +), 224 meters elevation on 15 April 2014. + + + +Figure 7. Morphology of holotype (CUMZ 3407) of +G. chiangraiensis +sp. n. A external ventral view, annular clitellum in +XVII-XXXVIII +B internal dorsal view. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Glyphidrilus chiangraiensis +sp. n. has clitellar wings on the lateral side of the body in XXIII, +XXIV-XXVI +, +1/2 +XXVII, XXVII, +1/2 +XXVIII, XXVIII. Clitellum in XVII, XVIII, XIX, XX, +XXI-XXXVI +, XXXVII, XXXVIII, XXXIX. Female pores, male pores and spermathecal pores not visible. Genital markings: paired or asymmetrical on aa in +XII-XIV +, XV, XVI, paired or asymmetrical on bc in XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV and XXVII, XXVIII, +XXIX-XXXV +. Four pairs of seminal vesicles in +IX-XII +. Intestinal origin in XVI. Ovaries in +XIII-XIV +. Spermathecae between 15/16-20/21. + + + +Description of holotype. + +Dimensions: body length 158 mm, diameter 3.0 mm in segment VIII, 4.0 mm before the clitellar wing in segment XXIII, 4.0 mm after wing in segment XXIX in clitellar region; body cylindrical in anterior part, quadrangular in transverse section behind clitellum. 282 segments. Body color pale brown with variations from red to pink at adjacent tissues of wing portion in different individuals of newly collected specimens. Clitellar wing on ventro-lateral part of clitellum in +XXIV-XXVII +, +1/2 +XXVIII, 3.7 mm and 4.0 mm in height, and 0.5 mm in width on both sides. Prostomium zygolobous. Dorsal pores absent. Clitellum annular in +XVII-XXXVIII +. Four pairs of setae per segment from II, setal formula aa:ab:bc:cd:dd=2.0:1.0:2.0:1.0:2.0 in segment VIII and 2.0:1.0:2.0:1.0:2.5 in postclitellar segments. Female pores, male pores, and spermathecal pores not visible. Genital markings: paired on aa in XIV, laterally paired or asymmetrical on bc in XXIII and +XXIX-XXXV +. + + +Septa 5/6-8/9 thicker than between other segments, 9/10-13/14 thick and 14/15 to the last segment thin. Gizzard small, globular in VIII. Intestine enlarged from XVI. Hearts, five pairs in +VII-XI +, first in VII and last in XI. A pair of holonephridia in each segment from segment XIII onwards. Seminal vesicles, four pairs in IX, X, XI, XII. Ovaries, two pairs in XIII and XIV. Testis free in X and XI. Prostate and accessory +glands +absent. Spermathecae sessile and diverticula absent, small elongated oval or globular between 15/16-20/21, about 0.1-0.2 mm in diameter, three to twelve per segment on each side per segment. + + + +Variations. + +Body lengths of adults (n = 283) ranged from 94-340 mm (155.42 ++/- +54.93), with 89-394 segments. Wings in XXIII, +XXXIV-XXVI +, +1/2 +XXVII, XXVII, +1/2 +XXVIII, XXVIII, clitellum in XVII, XVIII, XIX, XX, +XXI-XXXVI +, XXXVII, XXXVIII, XXXIX. Genital markings: paired or asymmetrical on aa in +XII-XIV +, XV, XVI, paired or asymmetrical on bc in XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV and XXVII, XXVIII, +XXIX-XXXV +. + + + +Distribution. +The new species is known from the type locality in the river banks of Mekong River at Wat Hatkai, Chiangkhong, Chiangrai, north Thailand, and was found in several locations along the Mekong River and its tributaries in the northeast and north of Thailand at Buengkan, Loei, Nongkhai, and Chiangrai and in Chaiyaburi, Luangprabang, and Sanakham to Vientiane of Laos. + + +Etymology. +The species was named after Chiangrai, the locality name. + + +Remarks. + +(see Table 1) +Glyphidrilus chiangraiensis +sp. n. differs from +G. vangviengensis +Chanabun & Panha, 2011 from Song River, Vieintiane, Laos by the latter having longer wings in XXIV, +XXV-XXXI +, XXXII, the genital markings widely paired in bc XVIII, XIX, XX, +XXI-XXIV +and XXXIII, XXXIV, paired on aa in +XII-XIV +, XV and lacking spermathecae. It differs from +G. yunnanensis +Chen & Xu, 1977 reported from China by +G. yunnanensis +having longer wings in +XXII-XXXII +, clitellum in +XVIII-XXXVIII +, and lacking spermathecae. It differs from the species recorded as +G. mekongensis +Panha & Chanabun, 2012 from Mekong River, Thailand by +G. mekongensis +having longer wings in +XXIV-1/2 +XXXIII, XXXIII, XXXIV, +1/2 +XXXV, and lacking spermathecae. It differs from +G. chiensis +Chanabun & Panha, 2013 from Chi River, Mahasarakham, northeast Thailand by +G. chiensis +having longer wings in XXIII, XXIV, XXV, +XXVI-XXIX +, XXX, XXXI, XXXII, and spermathecae between 12/13-18/19. It differs from +G. quadratus +Chanabun & Panha, 2013 reported from the Mun River by +G. quadratus +having longer wings in XXIII, +XXIV-XXVIII +, XXIX, XXX, XXXI, a bit longer clitellum in XV, XVI, XVII, +XVIII-XXXI +, XXXII, XXXIII, XXXIV, XXXV, XXXVI, and spermathecae between 12/13-17/18. It differs from +G. huailuangensis +Chanabun & Panha, 2013 recorded from Najahlauy National Park, Ubon Ratchathani, northeast Thailand by the latter having longer wings in XXV, +XXVI-XXX +, XXXI, clitellum in XII, XIII, +XVI-XXXII +, XXXIII, and lacks spermathecae. +Glyphidrilus chiangraiensis +sp. n. differs from +G. namphao +sp. n. by the latter having wings in +XVIII-XXIV +, clitellum in +XVII-XXVI +, XXIX, genital markings: paired on aa in XVII; paired or asymmetrical on bc in +XII-XV +, XXV, XXVI, and spermathecae between 13/14-16/17. It differs from +G. sekongensis +sp. n. by the latter having wings in +XXV-XXXI +, clitellum in XVI, +XVII-XXXVI +, XXXVII, and spermathecae between 12/13-15/16. It differs from +G. champasakensis +sp. n. from Mekong River at Ban Khonkhen, Champasak, Laos by the latter having longer wings in XXIII, +XXIV-1/2 +XXXII, XXXII, XXXIII, longer clitellum in XIX, +XX-XLIX +, L, LI, LII, and spermathecae between 14/15-19/20. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5D/E1/375DE1423C4E8AD1C37201892F931846.xml b/data/37/5D/E1/375DE1423C4E8AD1C37201892F931846.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c618b258385 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5D/E1/375DE1423C4E8AD1C37201892F931846.xml @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ + + + +New ants of rare genera and a new genus of ponerine ants. + + + +Author + +Weber, N. A. + +text + + +Annals of the Entomological Society of America + + +1939 + +32 + + +91 +104 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/3014/3014.pdf + +journal article +3014 + + + + +Cerapachys (Cerapachys) neotropicus +, +sp. nov. + + + +(Fig. 1) + +Worker.-Length, 3 mm. Head, excluding mandibles, slightly over 1 1/3 as long as wide, rectangular with gently convex sides and transverse occipital margin; anterior clypeal margin gently convex with minute medial tooth; mandibles trigonal with finely and irregularly denticulate cutting margin; frontal carinae in form of close, slightly divergent anteriorly, subvertical lamellae; antennal fossa sub-circular, bounded laterally by distinct carinae; eyes closer to mandibles than to occiput, very small, only slightly convex. Antennae 12-jointed; scapes clavate, all funicular joints transverse except terminal joint. Thorax from +above +twice as long as wide; rectangular with slightly convex pronotal margin, slightly impressed laterally in meso-epinotal region and from here posteriorly slightly convex at sides; epinotum convex between the distinct teeth. Petiole from above 1 1/4 longer than wide, quadrangular with posterior corners rounded, posterior margin and sides feebly convex. Postpetiole from above slightly longer than petiole and nearly 1 1/2 times broader, trapezoidal with feebly and irregularly convex sides. Gaster distinctly constricted between first and second segments, the latter distinctly larger than the former. Legs moderately short. + +Body shining, with coarse but only moderately abundant setigerous punctations. Legs smooth and shining with very few punctations. +Hairs fine, yellowish white, upright or inclined, limited to punctations on body, more numerous on appendages. Antennal funiculi with sparse, short hairs interspersed with short, appressed pubescence. +Color dark reddish brown, appendages lighter brown. + + + +Described from one worker taken by myself among leaves in low forest near Guapo Bay, Gulf of Paria, Trinidad, B. W. I., April 4, 1935. This locality is near the famous Pitch Lake and the area has an annual rainfall of between 70 and 80 inches. The forest was characterized by the abundance of the cocorite palm ( +Maximiliana caribaea +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5E/36/375E36C40CF9000F4274C074A361DF9B.xml b/data/37/5E/36/375E36C40CF9000F4274C074A361DF9B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..26f9d9e265f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5E/36/375E36C40CF9000F4274C074A361DF9B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ + + + +Studi sulle formiche della fauna Neotropica. + + + +Author + +Emery, C. + +text + + +Bollettino della Societa Entomologica Italiana + + +1896 + +28 + + +33 +107 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/3798/3798.pdf + +journal article +3798 + + + + +S. angulata Emery +. + + + +Nella mia descrizione della [[ queen ]] (Berlin, ent. Zeit. v. 39, p. 393, nota, 1894) ho trascurato un carattere che permette di distinguere facilmente questa dalle [[ queen ]] [[ queen ]] di tutte le altre specie note. Lo scapo delle antenne e fortemente ingrossato, fin dalla base, e il massimo della sua grossezza trovasi verso il terzo della sua lunghezza. Quel carattere non si osserva nella [[ worker ]]. + +Alla medesima specie si riferisce una delle +Solenopsis +lasciate senza nome nella mia nota sulle formiche raccolte presso La Plata nell'Argentina dal Dott. Spegazzini. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5E/87/375E87B4EE5B177DFF4A9827FC69FB2B.xml b/data/37/5E/87/375E87B4EE5B177DFF4A9827FC69FB2B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2cbd0dad526 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5E/87/375E87B4EE5B177DFF4A9827FC69FB2B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1425 @@ + + + +Complementary description of Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bagdasarjani Wainstein & Arutunjan (Acari: Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) based on specimens from western Iran + + + +Author + +Asali Fayaz, B. + + + +Author + +Khanjani, M. + + + +Author + +Rahmani, H. + + + +Author + +Ueckermann, E. A. + +text + + +Acarologia + + +2017 + +2016-12-19 + + +57 + + +2 + + +255 +267 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20164153 + +journal article +7283 +10.1051/acarologia/20164153 +ea87bf63-d177-4de7-bb3e-c74728777614 +2107-7207 +4667438 + + + + + + + +Typhlodromus +( +Anthoseius +) +bagdasarjani +Wainstein & Arutunjan + + + + + + + + + + +Typhlodromus bagdasarjani +Wainstein & Arutunjan, 1967: 1765 + + + + + + +Typhlodromus +( +Anthoseius +) +bagdasarjani +, Asali Fayaz +et al. +2013: 370 + +. + + + + +Diagnosis (Female) — Dorsal shield with five pairs of solenostomes ( +gd2 +, +gd4 +, +gd6 +, +gd8 +, +gd9 +); dorsal setae +Z5 +pointed apically; ventrianal shield with four pairs of preanal setae and without preanal pores; movable cheliceral digit toothless; calyx of spermatheca fundibular; basitarsus IV with a knobbed macroseta. + + + + +Female +( +Figures 1 +; +6 +P-S) (n = 6) — Idiosoma oval; setal pattern: 12A:8A/JV:ZV. All idiosomal and leg setae smooth, except +Z4 +and +Z5 +, barbed. + + +Dorsum ( +Fig. 1A +) — Dorsal shield reticulated, 345-365 long, 170 – 190 wide at level of + +R1 + +, with 18 pairs of setae and five pairs of solenostomes ( +gd2 +, +gd4 +, +gd6 +, +gd8 +, +gd9 +) and 14 pairs of lyrifissures. Length of setae: +j1 +24 – 26, +j3 +31 – 35, +j4 +19 – 22, +j5 +18 – 21, +j6 +25 – 28, +J2 +27 – 30, +J5 +9 – 10, +z2 +25 – 27, +z3 +28 – 30, +z4 +29 – 33, +z5 +20 – 23, +Z4 +53 – 55, +Z5 +68 – 73, + +s4 +35 + +– 38, + +s6 +37 + +– 40, + +S2 +41 + +– 44, + +S4 +35 + +– 38, + +S5 +29 + +– 32, +r3 +31 – 33, + +R1 + +28 – 30. + + +Venter ( +Fig. 1B +) — Sternal shield smooth, posterior margin with median lobe and with two pairs of setae of similar lengths [ +ST1 +(30 – 32), +ST2 +(30 – 33)] and two pairs of lyrifissures ( +iv1-2 +); setae +ST3 +30 – 34 and +ST4 +28 – 32 long and each set on a platelet, the latter with one small lyrifissure. Genital shield 115 – 130 long, 65 – 75 wide at level of base setae +ST5 +, Setae +ST5 +31 – 33 long. Two pairs of elongate metapodal platelet [30 – 33 and 14 – 17 long]. Ventrianal shield reticulated, 115 – 120 long and 80 – 90 at level of setae +ZV2 +, with four pairs of preanal setae +JV1 +23 – 25, +JV2 +21 – 23, +JV3 +22 – 25, +ZV2 +25 – 26 long and without preanal pores; para anal setae +PA +18 – 20 and post anal seta +PST +18 – 20 long. Opisthogastric cuticle bearing four pairs of setae, +JV4 +23 – 25 and +JV5 +53 – 58, +ZV1 +28 – 31, +ZV3 +22 – 25, long, all smooth, and four pairs of lyrifissures. + + +Peritreme ( +Fig. 1A +) — Extending almost to level of seta +z3 +, 85 – 100 long. + + +Chelicera ( +Fig. 1C +) — Chelicera 115 – 130 long; fixed digit 26 – 28 long, with two teeth; +pilus dentilis +4 long; movable digit 23 – 25 long and toothless. + + +Spermatheca ( +Fig. 1D +) — Calyx fundibular, 16 – 20 long and 9 – 10 wide at junction with vesicle. + + +Legs I-IV ( +Figs. 1E +, +6 +P-S) — Length of legs I-IV: 290 – 310, 250 – 260, 245 – 260 and 320 – 340, respectively. Numbers of setae on femora, genua and tibiae of legs I-IV given in table 1. Basitarsus IV with a knobbed macroseta, 49 – 54 long. + + + +FIGURE 1: + +T. +( +A. +) +bagdasarjani + +(Adult female): A – Dorsal view of idiosoma; B – Ventral view of idiosoma; C – Chelicera; D – Spermatheca; E – Basitarsus IV. + + + + +TABLE 1: Comparison of characters of all stages of + +T. +( +A. +) +bagdasarjani +Wainstein & Arutunjan, 1967 + +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Ch. / StageL.P.D. (♀)D. (♂)A. (♀)A. (♂)
+j1 +++++++
+j3 +++++++
+j4 +++++++
+j5 +++++++
+j6 +++++++
+J2 +-+++++
+J5 +-+++++
+z2 +++++++
+z3 +--++++
+z4 +++++++
+z5 +++++++
+Z4 +++++++
+Z5 +-+++++
+s4 +++++++
+s6 +-+++++
+S2 +-+++++
+S4 +-+++++
+S5 +-+++++
+r3 +-+++++
+R1 +-+++++
+ST1 +++++++
+ST2 +++++++
+ST3 +++++++
+ST4 +--++++
+ST5 +--++++
+JV1 +++++++
+JV2 +++++++
+JV3 +--++++
+JV4 +--+-+-
+JV5 +++++++
+ZV1 +--+-+-
+ZV2 +++++++
+ZV3 +--+-+-
Spermadactyl-----+
Macrosetae on basitarsus IV-+++++
Femora I-IV*10,7,5,-10,7,5,412,10,6,612,10,6,612,10,6,612,10,6,6
Genua I-IV*8,6,6,-8,6,6,510,7,7,710,7,7,710,7,7,710,7,7,7
Tibiae I-IV*8,7,7,-8,7,7,610,7,7,610,7,7,610,7,7,610,7,7,6
+ + + +* +: Numbers of setae. + + + + +FIGURE 2: + +T. +( +A. +) +bagdasarjani + +(Adult male): A – Dorsal view of idiosoma; B – Ventral view of idiosoma; C – Chelicera; D – Basitarsus IV. + + + + +FIGURE 3: + +T. +( +A. +) +bagdasarjani +(Deutonymph) + +: A – Dorsal view of idiosoma (♀); B – Ventral view of idiosoma (♀); C – Chelicera (♀); D – Basitarsus IV (♀); E – Ventral view of idiosoma (♂). + + + +Male +( +Figures 2 +; +6 +T-W) (n = 7) — idiosoma oval; setal pattern: 12A:8A/JV-4:ZV-1, 3. All idiosomal and leg setae smooth, except +Z4 +and +Z5 +, barbed. + + +Dorsum ( +Fig. 2A +) — Dorsal shield reticulated, 270-290 long, 155 – 180 wide at level of + +R1 + +, with 20 pairs of setae and five pairs of solenostomes ( +gd2 +, +gd4 +, +gd6 +, +gd8 +, +gd9 +) and 10 pairs of lyrifissures. Length of setae: +j1 +20 – 24, +j3 +25 – 30, +j4 +17 – 20, +j5 +16 – 18, +j6 +17 – 20, +J2 +22 – 23, +J5 +8 – 10, +z2 +17 – 22, +z3 +23 – 25, +z4 +26 – 30, +z5 +16 – 18, +Z4 +45 – 52, +Z5 +47 – 55, + +s4 +26 + +– 30, + +s6 +30 + +– 34, + +S2 +33 + +– 37, + +S4 +25 + +– 30, + +S5 +23 + +– 27, +r3 +24 – 28, + +R1 + +20 – 24. + + +Venter ( +Fig. 2B +) — Sternogenital shield smooth, anterior and posterior margins convex; five pairs of setae subequal in lengths ( +ST1 +24 – 27, +ST2 +24 – 27, +ST3 +23 – 25, +ST4 +23 – 25, +ST5 +23 – 24); three pairs of lyrifissures ( +iv1- iv3 +). Ventrianal shield reticulated, subtriangular; anterior margin convex, 108-117 long and 138-155 wide at level of setae +JV1 +; four pairs of pre-anal setae ( +JV1 +, +JV2 +, +JV3 +and +ZV2 +); three pairs of lyrifissures; no preanal pores. Opisthogastric cuticle with one pair of setae ( +JV5 +) and two pairs of lyrifissures. Length of opisthogastric setae: +JV1 +17 – 20, +JV2 +18 – 22, +JV3 +18 – 22, +JV5 +31 – 35, +ZV2 +20 – 23, +PA +15 – 17 and +PST +14 – 16. + + +Peritreme ( +Fig. 2A +) — Extending to slightly beyond insertion of +z4 +, 70 – 80 long. + + +Chelicera ( +Fig. 2C +) — Chelicera 105 – 115 long; fixed digit 21 – 23 long, with two teeth; +pilus dentilis +3 – 4 long; movable digit 19 – 22 long and toothless, spermadactyl 23 – 27 long, arched and slightly inflated distally. + + +Legs I-IV ( +Figs. 2D +, +6 +T-W) — Lengths: 220 – 230, 205 – 210, 190 – 195, 265 – 275, respectively. Numbers of setae on femora, genua and tibiae I-IV are given in table 1. Basitarsus IV with a knobbed macroseta, 38 – 43 long. + + +Deutonymph (female) +( +Figs. 3 +A-D, 6H-K) (n = 8) — Idiosoma oval. All idiosomal and leg setae smooth, except +Z4 +and +Z5 +, barbed. + + +Dorsum ( +Fig. 3A +) — Dorsal shield reticulated, with mediolateral incision, 275 – 290 long, 137 – 145 wide at level of setae + +R1 + +, with 18 pairs of setae and five pairs of solenostomes ( +gd2 +, +gd4 +, +gd6 +, +gd8 +, +gd9 +) and 12 pairs of lyrifissures. Length of setae: +j1 +22 – 25, +j3 +27-33, +j4 +17 – 20, +j5 +18 – 21, +j6 +24 – 25, +J2 +22 – 25, +J5 +7 – 10, +z2 +21 – 25, +z3 +23 – 27, +z4 +27 – 31, +z5 +17 – 20, +Z4 +50 – 55, +Z5 +50 – 57, + +s4 +30 + +– 35, + +s6 +30 + +– 36, + +S2 +35 + +– 40, + +S4 +30 + +– 35, + +S5 +27 + +– 31, +r3 +27 – 31, + +R1 + +23 – 27. + + +Venter ( +Fig. 3B +) — Sternal shield smooth, anterior margin convex, with four pairs of setae subequal in lengths ( +ST1 +25 – 27, +ST2 +25 – 27, +ST3 +22 – 25, +ST4 +20 – 22), three pairs of lyrifissures ( +iv1-iv3 +); fifth sternal seta ( +ST5 +) set on soft integument, 22 – 25 long; a pair of fine elongate metapodal shields 15 – 20 long. Opisthogastric cuticle with eight pairs of setae ( +JV1-JV5 +, +ZV1- ZV3 +) and four pairs of lyrifissures. Length of opisthogastric setae: +JV1 +18 – 20, +JV2 +18 – 21, +JV3 +18 – 20, +JV4 +17 – 20, +JV5 +40 – 44, +ZV1 +18 – 21, +ZV2 +18-21, +ZV3 +15 – 18, +PA +15 – 17, +PST +15 – 17. + + +Peritreme ( +Fig. 3A +) — Extending to level between +z2-z3 +, 130 – 140 long. + + +Chelicera ( +Fig. 3C +) — Chelicera 125 – 129 long; fixed digit 23 – 24 long, with two teeth; +pilus dentilis +4 long; movable digit 20 long and toothless. + + +Legs I-IV ( +Figs. 3D +, +6 +H-K) — Lengths: 245 – 250, 210 – 215, 210 – 217, 300 – 310, respectively. Numbers of setae on femora, genua and tibiae I-IV are given in table 1. Basitarsus IV with a knobbed macroseta, 51 – 55 long. + + +Deutonymph (male) +( +Figs. 3E +, +6 +L-O) (n = 7) — The idisomal and cheliceral characters are similar to female deutonymph however it can be distinguished by characteristics of the opisthogastric region ( +Fig. 3E +). Opisthogastric cuticle with five pairs of setae ( +JV1-JV3 +, +JV5 +, +ZV2 +) and three pairs of lyrifissures. Length of opisthogastric setae: +JV1 +17 – 20, +JV2 +17 – 20, +JV3 +16 – 18, +JV5 +32 – 38, +ZV2 +16 – 20, +PA +15, +PST +15 – 17. + + +Legs I-IV ( +Figs. 6 +L-O) — Lengths: 230 – 240, 185 – 190, 196 – 205, 260 – 270, respectively. Numbers of setae on femora, genua, tibiae and tarsi of legs I-IV are given in table 1. + + +Protonymph +( +Figs. 4 +, +6 +D-G) (n = 8) — Idiosoma oval. All idiosomal and leg setae smooth, except +Z4 +and +Z5 +, barbed. + + +Dorsum ( +Fig. 4A +) — Separate podonotal and opisthonotal shields; podonotal shield smooth, 130 – 140 long and 110 – 120 wide at level of +s4 +, with nine pairs of setae ( +j1 +, +j3 +, +j4 +, +j5 +, +j6 +, +z2 +, +z4 +, +z5 +, +s4 +), two pairs of solenostomes ( +gd2 +, +gd4 +) and three pairs of lyrifissures; opisthonotal shield reticulated, 48 – 60 long, 75 – 90 wide at level of +S4 +, with five pairs of setae and two pairs solenostomes ( +gd8 +, +gd9 +) and five pairs of lyrifissures; setae +J2 +, +s6 +, +S2 +, +r3 +and + +R1 + +on soft integument (fig. 4A). Length of setae: +j1 +22 – 27, +j3 +27 – 31, +j4 +18 – 20, +j5 +18 – 20, +j6 +23 – 27, +J2 +20 – 24, +J5 +7 – 9, +z2 +18 – 22, +z4 +27 – 30, +z5 +16 – 18, +Z4 +50 – 55, +Z5 +42 – 46, + +s4 +30 + +– 35, + +s6 +26 + +– 30, + +S2 +34 + +– 37, + +S4 +25 + +– 31, + +S5 +20 + +– 25, +r3 +23 – 27, + +R1 + +19 – 23. Unsclerotized cuticle between podonotal and opisthonotal shields with several pairs of small, irregular plates and with a pair of solenostome ( +gd6 +). + + + +FIGURE 4: + +T. +( +A. +) +bagdasarjani +(Protonymph) + +: A – Dorsal view of idiosoma; B – Ventral view of idiosoma; C – Chelicera; D – Basitarsus IV. + + + + +FIGURE 5: + +T. +( +A. +) +bagdasarjani +(Larva) + +: A – Dorsal view of idiosoma; B – Ventral view of idiosoma; C – Chelicera. + + + + +FIGURE 6: + +T. +( +A. +) +bagdasarjani + +femora, genua and tibiae: A-C – (Larva, legs I-III, respectively); D-G – (Protonymph, legs I-IV, respectively); H-K – (Deutonymph ♀; legs I-IV, respectively); L-O – (Deutonymph ♂; legs I-IV, respectively); P-S – (Adult female; legs I-IV, respectively); T-W – (Adult male; legs I-IV, respectively). + + + +Venter ( +Fig. 4B +) – Sternal shield smooth, with three pairs of setae subequal in lengths ( +ST1 +23 – 28, +ST2 +22 – 25, +ST3 +24 – 25) and two pairs of lyrifissures ( +iv1-iv2 +). Opisthogastric cuticle with four pairs of smooth setae ( +JV1-2 +, +JV5 +, +ZV2 +) and six pair of lyrifissures on small platelets. Anal opening surrounded with 3 setae ( +PA +and +PST +). Length of opisthogastric setae: +JV1 +19-22, +JV2 +17 – 21, +JV5 +30 – 33, +ZV2 +19 – 21, +PA +14 – 15, +PST +14 – 15. + + +Peritreme ( +Fig. 4A +) — Vestigial; extending to level between setae +S5-6 +, 25 – 30 long. + + +Chelicera ( +Fig. 4C +) — Chelicera 85 – 100 long; fixed digit 18 – 20 long, with two teeth; +pilus dentilis +2 – 3 long; movable digit 14 – 17 long, toothless. + + +Legs I-IV ( +Figs. 4D +, +6 +D-G) — Lengths: 235 – 240, 190 – 200, 190 – 195 and 250 – 255, respectively. Numbers of setae on femora, genua and tibiae I-IV are given in table 1. Basitarsus IV with a knobbed macroseta, 48 – 53 long. + + +Larva +( +Fig. 5 +; +6 +A-C) (n = 6) — Idiosoma oval. All idiosomal and leg setae smooth. + + +Dorsum ( +Fig. 5A +) — Separate podonotal and opisthonotal shields, both smooth; podonotal shield 126 – 135 long and 115 – 130 wide at level of setae +s4 +, with nine pairs of setae ( +j1 +, +j3 +, +j4 +, +j5 +, +j6 +, +z2 +, +z4 +, +z5 +, +s4 +) and one pair of solenostome ( +gd2 +); opisthonotal shield 55 – 70 long, 110 – 130 wide at level of solenostome +gd6 +and four pairs of lyrifissures, with a pair of setae ( +Z4 +). Length of setae: +j1 +35 – 40, +j3 +18 – 20, +j4 +10 – 12, +j5 +9 – 11, +j6 +75 – 84, +z2 +12 – 14, +z4 +33 – 38, +z5 +9 – 10, +Z4 +135 – 145, +s4 +72 – 79. Setae +s4 +, +j6 +long and knobbed distally and +Z4 +whiplike and knobbed distally. Unsclerotized cuticle between podonotal and opisthonotal shields with a pair of solenostome ( +gd6 +). + + +Venter ( +Fig. 5B +) — Sternal shield smooth, and with three pairs of setae of subequal lengths ( +ST1 +20 – 25, +ST2 +20 – 24, +ST3 +20 – 22). Opisthogastric cuticle with four pairs of smooth setae ( +JV1-2 +, +JV5 +, +ZV2 +) and a pair of lyrifissures. Length of opisthogastric setae: +JV1 +11 – 14, +JV2 +23 – 26, +JV5 +6, +ZV2 +8 – 10, +PA +31 – 35, +PST +21 – 23. + + +Chelicera ( +Fig. 5C +) — Chelicera 60 – 70 long; fixed and movable digits 13 – 15 and 10 – 12 long, respectively, both toothless. + + +Legs I-III ( +Figs. 6 +A-C) — Lengths: 215 – 220, 160 – 170 and 160 – 165, respectively. Numbers of setae on femur, genu and tibia I-III are given in table 1. + + +Remarks — Unlike previous studies, measurements of idiosomal setae and organotaxy are given in this study for adult males and mobile immature stages. Shape and arrangement of idiosomal setae closely resemble the re-description of +Arutunjan (1977) +, with slight differences, +e.g. +larva with an entire opisthonotal shield in this study but divided in that study. Femur I of larva and protonymph with 10 setae as opposed to nine setae in +Arutunjan (1970 +, +1972 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5E/BE/375EBE9A8ED20E3C481D0BDDF2185A49.xml b/data/37/5E/BE/375EBE9A8ED20E3C481D0BDDF2185A49.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..114280ffdd6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5E/BE/375EBE9A8ED20E3C481D0BDDF2185A49.xml @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part A) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +252 +342 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Agaricus viscidus +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 1173. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Sylvis." RCN: 8449. + + +Type not designated. + + +Original material: none traced. + + + +Current name: + + +Gomphidius viscidus + +(L.) Fr. + +( +Gomphidiaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5E/CA/375ECABD483A96E0D90C5BF863993DAF.xml b/data/37/5E/CA/375ECABD483A96E0D90C5BF863993DAF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..20143dde363 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5E/CA/375ECABD483A96E0D90C5BF863993DAF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + +Order Primates + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +111 +184 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Cebus nigritus +subsp. +cucullatus +Spix 1823 + + + + + +Synonyms: + +Cebus nigritus +subsp. +caliginosus +Elliot 1910 + +; + +Cebus nigritus +subsp. +vellerosus +I. +Geoffroy 1851 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5F/3E/375F3EDA9B4970E70386B730EC64DD72.xml b/data/37/5F/3E/375F3EDA9B4970E70386B730EC64DD72.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..97881b40971 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5F/3E/375F3EDA9B4970E70386B730EC64DD72.xml @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Cricetidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +955 +1189 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + + +Lasiopodomys mandarinus +(Milne-Edwards 1871) + + + + + + + +[Lasiopodomys] mandarinus +(Milne-Edwards 1871) + +, +Rech. Hist. Nat. Mammiferes: 129 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +China +, +Shanxi +(Shansi), probably near Saratsi. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Mandarin Vole +. + + + + +Synonyms: + +Lasiopodomys faeceus +(G. M. +Allen 1924 +) + +; + +Lasiopodomys jeholensis +(Mori 1939) + +; + +Lasiopodomys johannes +(Thomas 1910) + +; + +Lasiopodomys kishidai +(Mori 1930) + +; + +Lasiopodomys mandrianus +( +Miller 1896 +) + +; + +Lasiopodomys pullus +(Miller 1911) + +; + +Lasiopodomys vinogradovi +(Fetisov 1936) + +. + + + + +Distribution: +NE and C +China +( +Nei Mongol +, +Liaoning +, +Beijing +, +Shaanxi +, +Shanxi +, +Henan +, +Jiangsu +, and +Anhui +; +Zhang et al., 1997 +); N +Mongolia +; Transbaikal region and E and SE Siberia of +Russia +; +Korea +( +Won and Smith, 1999 +); range limits uncertain. + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +– Lower Risk (lc). + + + + +Discussion: +External, cranial, dental, and distributional characteristics presented by G. M. Allen (1940). G-banding of sex chromosomes and its significance described by +Zhu et al. (1994) +. Structural and functional comparisons of the masticatory complex in + +L. mandarinus + +and + +Myospalax + +undertaken by +Li and Wang (1999) +. Aspects of reproductive biology documented by +Zorenko et al. (1994) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5F/A7/375FA7194F6C545FB3801C7765697ED0.xml b/data/37/5F/A7/375FA7194F6C545FB3801C7765697ED0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f21c8846705 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5F/A7/375FA7194F6C545FB3801C7765697ED0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,209 @@ + + + +Unloved, paraphyletic or misplaced: new genera and species of small to minute lucinid bivalves and their relationships (Bivalvia, Lucinidae) + + + +Author + +Taylor, John D. + + + +Author + +Glover, Emily A. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +899 + + +109 +140 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.899.47070 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.899.47070 +1313-2970-899-109 +9AA5216D3150475DA165B36EABCB61E2 +E0FA12EBCCD55E3B8BC61796697C69C3 + + + + +Rugalucina vietnamica (Zorina, 1978) +Figs 3 +, +4 + + + + +Pillucina vietnamica +Zorina, 1978:195, figs 3 & 6). + + +Pillucina vietnamica +: +Lutaenko 2000 +: 383, pl. 1, figs 1, 2; pl. 3, fig. 1. + + +Pillucina vietnamica +(part): +Glover and Taylor 2001 +: 273, figs 7a-g. + + +Pillucina vietnamica +: +Glover et al. 2016 +: 553, fig. H, A-M. + + +Pillucina angela +(Melvill, 1899) (part): +Huber 2015 +: 422, figs p. 76. + + + +Type material. + + +Pillucina vietnamica + +syntypes (ZISP), 13 shells and 1 valve, L 5.5-8.9 mm. + + + +Type locality. +Intertidal, south coast of Hainan, China. + + +Description. +Small (L to 10 mm), sub-circular, longer than high, posteriorly slightly truncate, moderately inflated. Shell white, slightly translucent and waxy in appearance. Sculpture of many, fine, low, commarginal lamellae and low radial ribs which are broader and more prominent towards the anterior and posterior. Radial ribs are conspicuously fluted where commarginal lamellae cross giving a crinkled appearance. Lunule elongate, lanceolate and impressed, slightly asymmetrical. Ligament internal, short, situated on a broadly triangular resilifer. Hinge: right valve with single, cardinal tooth, anterior and posterior lateral teeth small, posterior tooth elongate. Left valve with two narrow cardinal teeth, a small anterior lateral socket and posterior lateral narrow socket. Anterior adductor muscle scar medium-long, detached for ca. 50 % of length. Posterior scar ovate. Pallial line entire, sometimes partially discontinuous or irregularly lobate. Shell margin crenulate, with crenulations coarser towards anterior and posterior. + + +Distribution. + +Singapore +: Pulau Semakau (NHMUK), Seringat Bay (NHMUK). +Malaysia +: Langkawi (AMS). +Western Thailand +: Ao Bang Ben, Kapoe (NHMUK), Ban Bang Ben (NHMUK), Tung Nam Dan, Phang Nga Province (NHMUK), +Eastern Thailand +: Kungkraben Bay (NHMUK). +Cambodia +: 5 km E of port, Sihanoukville (NHMUK). +Vietnam +: Dam Bay near Nha Trang ( +Zvonareva et al. 2019 +). +China +: Hainan (MNHN), Hong Kong (NHMUK), Daya Bay (NHMUK). + + + +Habitat. + +Intertidal to shallow sub-tidal seagrass and muddy habitats. Recorded at high densities in muddy seagrass and mangrove fringe habitats of eastern and western Thailand ( +Meyer et al. 2008 +; Rattanachot and Prathep 2016). Gill structure and symbiotic bacteria are illustrated in +Fig. 4N, O +. + + + +Remarks. + +Although we formerly recorded + +Rugalucina vietnamica + +with a broad longitudinal range from the northern Red Sea to southern China ( +Glover and Taylor 2001 +) we now regard it as having a narrower range along the continental margin of south eastern Asia with few records from islands. Despite intensive sampling by the MNHN Paris Expeditions around Panglao, Philippines (2004, 2005) and Papua New Guinea (2012, 2014) no + +R. vietnamica + +were recorded ( +Glover and Taylor 2016 +and unpublished data). + + + +Figure 4. + +Rugalucina vietnamica + +(Zorina, 1978). + +A-C + + +Pillucina vietnamica + +Zorina, 1978 syntypes (ZISP), exterior of right valve and interior of left and right valves, Hainan, China, L 5.5-8.9 mm +D +internal drawing of +C. E, F + +R. vietnamica + +Palau Semaku, Singapore (NHMUK 20150057), L 8.5 mm + +G-L + + +R. vietnamica + +Kungkraben Bay, eastern Thailand (NHMUK 20191072) +G +exterior of right valve, L 7.0 mm. +H +exterior of left valve, L 7.0 mm +I, J +interior of left and right valves, L 7.7 mm +K +dorsal view L 5.6 mm +L, M +detail of hinge of +I +and +J +. +N +Section through gill of + +Rugalucina vietnamica + +Kungkraben Bay, Thailand showing filaments with ciliary (cz) and bacteriocyte zones (bz). Critical-point dried preparation +O +detail showing abundant bacterial symbionts in bacteriocytes. Scale bars: 20 +µm +( +N +); 10 +µm +( +O +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/5F/AC/375FAC1329B7A7F36269C5E4F0128BE3.xml b/data/37/5F/AC/375FAC1329B7A7F36269C5E4F0128BE3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9ea2001a51b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/5F/AC/375FAC1329B7A7F36269C5E4F0128BE3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,574 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Ranunculaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/ranunculaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Ranunculus bulbosus +L. + + + + + +Knolliger Hahnenfuss + + + + +Art ISFS: 337700 Checklist: 1037510 +Ranunculaceae +Ranunculus + +Ranunculus bulbosus L. +Enthaelt + +: +Ranunculus bulbosus L. subsp. bulbosus + + +Zusammenfassung + + + + +Artbeschreibung + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: +10-50 cm +hoch, meist verzweigt. + +Staengel +am Grund knollig verdickt + +. +Blaetter +bis zum Grund 3teilig, Abschnitte tief geteilt, sehr vielgestaltig. +Bluetenboden +behaart. + +Bluetenstiele +gefurcht. +Kelchblaetter +nach dem +Aufbluehen +zurueckgeschlagen + +. +Blueten +gelb, Durchmesser +2-3 cm +. Fruchtschnabel +gekruemmt +. + + + + +Bluetezeit + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: 5-7 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: Trockene Wiesen und Raine / kollin-subalpin / CH + + + + +Verbreitung global + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: +Europaeisch + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte + +(nach +Landolt & al. 2010 +) + +242-434.h.2n=16 + + + +Status + + + +Status IUCN +: Nicht +gefaehrdet + + + + + +Oekologie + + + +Lebensform +Mehrjaehriger +Hemikryptophyt + + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + + + + + + + + +
+4.2 - +Waermeliebende +Trockenrasen +
+4.2.4 - +Mitteleuropaeischer +Halbtrockenrasen ( +Mesobromion +) +
+ + + +fett + +Dominante Art, welche das Aussehen des Lebensraumes +mitpraegt + +Charakterart +Weniger strikt an den Lebensraum gebundene Art + + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F +maessig +trocken +Lichtzahl LhellSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rneutral bis basisch (pH 5.5-8.5)Temperaturzahl T +montan ( +Waelder +mit Buche, Weisstanne, in den Zentralalpen mit +Waldfoehre +) +
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +naehrstoffarm + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subkontinental (niedrige relative Luftfeuchtigkeit, grosse Temperaturschwankungen, eher kalte Winter)
+ + + + +Nomenklatur + + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Ranunculus bulbosus +L. + + + + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Knolliger Hahnenfuss +Nom +francais +: +Renoncule bulbeuse +Nome italiano: +Ranuncolo bulboso + + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Ranunculus bulbosus L. + + +Checklist 2017 + +337700
= +Ranunculus bulbosus L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2001 + +198
= +Ranunculus bulbosus L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2012 + +173
= +Ranunculus bulbosus L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2018 + +173
= +Ranunculus bulbosus L. + + +Index synonymique 1996 + +337700
= +Ranunculus bulbosus L. + + +Landolt 1977 + +1192
= +Ranunculus bulbosus L. + + +Landolt 1991 + +1027
= +Ranunculus bulbosus L. + + +SISF/ISFS 2 + +337700
= +Ranunculus bulbosus L. + + +Welten & Sutter 1982 + +398
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Status Indigenat +: Indigen + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein + + +Status Rote Liste national 2016 + + +Status IUCN +: Nicht +gefaehrdet + + + +Zusaetzliche +Informationen + +Kriterien IUCN: -- + + +Status Rote Liste regional 2019 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Biogeografische RegionenStatusKriterien IUCN
Jura (JU) +nicht +gefaehrdet +(Least Concern) +
Mittelland (MP) +nicht +gefaehrdet +(Least Concern) +
Alpennordflanke (NA) +nicht +gefaehrdet +(Least Concern) +
+Alpensuedflanke +(SA) + +nicht +gefaehrdet +(Least Concern) +
+Oestliche +Zentralalpen (EA) + +nicht +gefaehrdet +(Least Concern) +
Westliche Zentralalpen (WA) +nicht +gefaehrdet +(Least Concern) +
+ + + +Status nationale +Prioritaet +/Verantwortung + + + + + + + +
+Keine nationale +Prioritaet +oder internationale Verantwortung +
+ + +Schutzstatus + + + + + + +
Kein internationaler, nationaler oder kantonaler Schutz
+ +Status in sektoriellen Umweltpolitiken + + + + + + + +
+Umweltziele Landwirtschaft: +L - Leitartweitere Informationen
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/1A/37601A44354BFB1430ACF977FEA1F892.xml b/data/37/60/1A/37601A44354BFB1430ACF977FEA1F892.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..03fc4ef89b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/1A/37601A44354BFB1430ACF977FEA1F892.xml @@ -0,0 +1,868 @@ + + + +First Japanese Specimen-based Records of Cypho zaps (Perciformes: Pseudochromidae) from Yonaguni-jima Island, the Yaeyama Islands + + + +Author + +Yoshida, Tomohiro +The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, 1 - 21 - 24 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890 - 0065, Japan E-mail: k 5299534 @ kadai. jp & Corresponding author +k5299534@kadai.jp + + + +Author + +Koeda, Keita +The Kagoshima University Museum, 1 - 21 - 30 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890 - 0065, Japan E-mail: hatampo @ gmail. com (KK); motomura @ kaum. kagoshima-u. ac. jp (HM) +hatampo@gmail.com(KK);motomura@kaum.kagoshima-u.ac.jp + + + +Author + +Motomura, Hiroyuki +The Kagoshima University Museum, 1 - 21 - 30 Korimoto, Kagoshima 890 - 0065, Japan E-mail: hatampo @ gmail. com (KK); motomura @ kaum. kagoshima-u. ac. jp (HM) +hatampo@gmail.com(KK);motomura@kaum.kagoshima-u.ac.jp + +text + + +Species Diversity + + +2016 + +2016-11-25 + + +21 + + +171 +175 + + + +journal article +10.12782/sd.21.2.171 +2189-7301 +5737676 + + + + + + +Cypho zaps +Gill, 2004 + + + + +[New Japanese generic name: Donan-megisu-zoku] [New standard Japanese name: Donan-megisu] ( +Figs 1–2 +; +Tables 1–2 +) + + + + + + + +Cypho zaps +Gill, 2004: 23 + + +, figs 8–10 ( +type +locality: Batan Island, +Philippines +); + + +Senou +et al. +2007: 52 + + +, fig. 6 (Shimojijima island, Miyako Islands, +Japan +); + +Ho and Shao 2011: 42 + +(Green and Orchid islands and Kenting, Taiwan); + +Allen and Erdmann 2012: 323 + +, lower figs (Halmahera and Raja Ampat Islands, +Indonesia +); + + +Yang +et al. +2013: 79 + + +, lower left side fig. (Orchid Island, Taiwan). + + + + + +Fig. 1. Fresh specimens of + +Cypho zaps + +collected from Yonaguni-jima island, Japan. A, KAUM–I. 78334, 35.6 mm standard length (SL), Rakuda Rock; B, KAUM–I. 78364, 38.2 mm SL, off Hinan Port; C, KAUM–I. 78543, 31.6 mm SL, off Umabana. + + + + +Material examined. + +All +from +Yonaguni-jima island +, +Yaeyama Islands +, +Okinawa Prefecture +, +Japan +: +KAUM +–I + +. + +78334, +35.6 mm +SL, +Rakuda Rock +, +24°26′27″N +, +122°57′02″E +, + +20 m +depth + +, + +17 September 2015 + +, K + +. + +Koeda +; +KAUM +–I + +. + +78364, +38.2 mm +SL, off +Kubura Hinan Port +, +24°26′35″N +, +122°56′22″E +, + +26 m +depth + +, + +18 September 2015 + +, K + +. + +Koeda +; +KAUM +–I + +. + +78543, +31.6 mm +SL, off +Umabana +, +24°28′21″N +, +122°57′49″E +, + +26 m +depth + +, + +22 September 2015 + +, K + +. + +Koeda + +. + + + + +Description. +Body oblong, moderately deep and compressed, deepest at anus. Dorsal profile of head and body in side view convex from snout tip to caudal-fin base. Ventral profile of head and body in side view convex from lower-jaw tip to end of anal-fin base, straight at caudal peduncle. Head pointed, large, +3.7–3.8 in +SL. Anterior lateral line ending below base of 18th dorsal-fin soft ray. Posterior lateral line beginning below base of 18th dorsal-fin soft ray. Eye round- ed, large, 3.0– +3.1 in +HL. Pupil tear-drop shaped. Mouth small, slightly oblique, forming angle of +ca +. 30° to horizontal axis of body. Posterior margin of maxilla extending slightly beyond vertical drawn through center of pupil; upper-jaw length less than half head length. + +Two pairs of enlarged canine teeth on anterior part of each jaw; villiform teeth in 4–6 rows at symphysis, diminishing to 1 or 2 rows on sides of jaw in upper jaw. Villiform teeth in 1 or 2 rows in lower jaw. Two to 4 rows of tiny teeth on vomer and ectopterygoids. + + +Table 1. Meristics of + +Cypho zaps + +specimens from Japan and type specimens (western Pacific Ocean). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
This study +Gill (2004) +
+Non-types Yonaguni-jima island +n +=3 +Holotype Philippines +Paratypes Western Pacific +n +=17 +
Standard length (SL; mm)31.6–38.235.430.4–51.0
Dorsal-fin raysIII, 23III, 23III, 22–23
Anal-fin raysIII, 14III, 14III, 14
Pectoral-fin rays16–171716–19
Upper procurrent caudal-fin rays6—6–7
Lower procurrent caudal-fin rays555–6
Total caudal-fin rays292828–30
Scales in lateral series353529–37
Anterior lateral-line scales24–282824–31
Anterior lateral line terminating beneath segmented dorsal-fin ray15–18th17th15–21st
Posterior lateral-line scales5–9+17+13–13+0–2
Scale rows between lateral lines332–4
Horizontal scale rows above anal-fin origin141514–18
Circumpeduncular scales14–161414–16
Pre-dorsal-fin scale rows14–151513–18
Gill rakers4–5+11=15–164+10=143–5+9–11=13–16
Pseudobranch filaments10107–14
Circumorbital pores17–182016–26
Preopercular pores8108–16
Dentary pores444–5
Posterior interorbital pores000
+ +Anterior nostril with short tube, uppermost margin level with ventral margin of pupil. Posterior nostril oval, opening vertically, uppermost margin below level of middle of pupil. Opercular and preopercular margins smooth. Gill rakers slender, moderately long but shorter than gill filaments. Head nearly full-scaled, only region around nostrils and pores on snout unscaled; small scales on base of dorsal, anal, and caudal fins. +Origin of dorsal fin anterior to vertical drawn through pectoral- and pelvic-fin origins; third spine of dorsal fin longest; 20th or 21st soft ray of dorsal fin longest. Origin of anal fin below base of eighth soft ray of dorsal fin; third spine of anal fin longest; 13th soft ray of anal fin longest. Origin of pelvic fin below central part of pectoral-fin base. Pectoral fin rounded, posterior tip reaching vertical drawn through base of seventh soft ray of dorsal fin. Posterior tip of depressed pelvic fin reaching vertical drawn through base of eighth soft ray of dorsal fin. Caudal fin rounded. + + +Fig. 2. Underwater photograph of + +Cypho zaps + +, off Yonaguni-jima island, 16 January 2012, taken by T. Uchiyama. + + + +Coloration when fresh +—Strength and intensity of color varying between specimens. Head bright orange-red to yellow, body bright orange-red to orange, with orange to yellow abdomen. Posterior and ventral margin of orbit dark-blue to blue. Scales of head and body, except abdomen, each with dark-blue to blue oblique bar in middle. Bars wider posteriorly on body. Bluish-grey stripe along dorsal margin of upper jaw curving posterodorsally and ending behind margin of eye. Pupil black; iris bright orange to yellow with two diagonal and parallel dark-blue to blue bars, respectively located above and below pupil. Dorsal and anal fins bright orange-red to orange, lighter distally. One or two faint bluish-grey mid-lateral stripes on dorsal and anal fins. Outer margin of both fins bluish-grey. Pectoral fin semi-transparent without distinct markings. Pelvic fins semi-transparent yellow to orange with pale-blue anterior margin. Caudal fin bright orange-red to lighter orange distally, with faint bluish-grey mid-caudal stripe and bluish-grey outer margin. + + +Coloration in life +—Based on underwater photographs taken at Yonaguni-jima island ( +Fig. 2 +): similar to coloration of fresh specimens, but whole body generally pale. + + +Coloration of preserved specimens +—Head and body pale tan; dark markings persistent on head and body scales. Dorsal, anal, and caudal fins with blackish distal margins and mid-lateral stripes. + + + + +Table 2. Morphometrics of specimens of + +Cypho zaps + +(expressed as percentages of SL) from Japan and type specimens (western Pacific Ocean). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
This study +Gill (2004) +
+Non-types Yonaguni-jima island +n +=3 +Holotype Philippines +Paratypes Western Pacific +n +=45 +
Standard length (SL; mm)31.6–38.235.430.4–51.0
Head length26.4–27.325.123.1–27.0
Orbit diameter8.5–9.09.98.0–10.9
Snout length6.0–6.55.14.8–6.3
Fleshy interorbital width4.1–5.24.84.5–5.6
Bony interorbital width3.0–3.93.12.8–3.7
Body width14.2–14.612.411.4–14.8
Distance from snout tip to posterior tip of retroarticular bone13.9–14.914.713.2–15.1
Pre-dorsal-fin length33.9–35.132.830.5–35.2
Pre-pelvic-fin length32.0–34.332.229.6–33.4
Distance from posterior tip of retroarticular bone to pelvic-fin origin17.7–21.518.617.3–20.5
Distance from dorsal-fin origin to pelvic-fin origin27.6–28.228.026.9–30.6
Distance from dorsal-fin origin to base of middle part of dorsal-fin ray35.8–36.437.335.0–37.8
Distance from dorsal-fin origin to anal-fin origin39.9–40.741.539.4–42.5
Distance from pelvic-fin origin to anal-fin origin21.5–25.926.325.3–30.6
Distance from middle of dorsal-fin ray base to end of dorsal-fin base24.9–26.326.323.3–27.3
Distance from middle of dorsal-fin ray base to anal-fin origin27.5–29.828.826.0–27.9
Distance from anal-fin origin to end of dorsal-fin base37.4–38.337.335.0–39.0
Anal-fin base length31.0–31.930.828.1–32.0
Distance from end of dorsal-fin base to end of anal-fin base16.1–16.515.813.3–16.8
Distance from end of dorsal-fin base to end of dorsal edge of caudal peduncle10.9–11.110.28.9–11.4
Distance from end of dorsal-fin base to end of ventral edge of caudal peduncle16.9–18.718.115.9–18.7
Distance from end of anal-fin base to end of dorsal edge of caudal peduncle18.3–19.618.917.1–20.1
Distance from end of anal-fin base to end of ventral edge of caudal peduncle10.7–11.511.910.7–12.9
1st dorsal-fin spine length1.9–2.42.31.7–3.2
2nd dorsal-fin spine length3.4–4.44.54.1–5.7
3rd dorsal-fin spine length5.8–7.07.15.8–7.7
1st segmented dorsal-fin ray length10.8–11.513.09.9–13.8
Length of 4th-to-last segmented dorsal-fin ray16.418.917.7–21.8
1st anal-fin spine length1.9–2.22.31.6–3.9
2nd anal-fin spine length4.1–4.74.83.9–6.7
3rd anal-fin spine length6.3–7.17.65.8–9.0
First segmented anal-fin ray length10.8–11.712.110.6–13.6
Length of 4th-to-last segmented anal-fin ray16.2–18.718.117.1–20.8
Third pectoral-fin ray length16.1–18.618.414.5–19.3
Pelvic-fin spine length9.8–9.99.98.8–11.0
Second segmented pelvic-fin ray length21.5–23.423.221.2–24.4
Caudal-fin length25.7–27.528.225.2–32.3
+ + + +Distribution. + +Cypho zap + +s has been recorded from the western Pacific Ocean at the following localities: Kawa Island, Raja Ampat Islands, +Indonesia +( +Gill 2004 +); Batan, Mavulis, and Sabtang islands, Batan Islands, and Luzon, +Philippines +( +Gill 2004 +); Green and Orchid islands and Kenting, +Taiwan +( +Gill 2004 +; +Ho and Shao 2011 +); and Yonaguni-jima island, Yaeyama Islands, +Japan +(this study). Underwater photographs of + +C. zaps + +have been taken at +West Papua +and +Sulawesi +, +Indonesia +( +Allen and Erdmann 2012 +); Orchid Island, +Taiwan +( + +Yang +et al +. 2013 + +); Yonaguni-jima island, +Japan +( +Gill 2004 +–used for color description, but unpublished; this study); Nakanougan-jima island (KPM-NR 22932), Hateru- ma-jima island (KPM-NR 13185, 26770), and Iriomote-jima island (KPM-NR 17116) (all Yaeyama Islands, +Japan +); Shimoji-jima island, Miyako Islands, +Japan +( + +Senou +et al. +2007 + +); and Kume-jima island, +Okinawa +Islands, +Japan +(KPM-NR 38916, 38917). The collection data for the preserved specimens indicates capture depths of +0–26 m +, and the underwater photographs were taken at depths of + +5– +35 m + +. + + + + +Remarks. +The present specimens from Yonaguni-jima island were identified as a species of the genus + +Cypho + +, being clearly distinguished from other genera by the following combination of characters: dorsal-fin rays III, 22–24; analfin rays III, 13–15; circumpeduncular scales 14–17; vertebrae 10+16 ( +Gill 2004 +). They were subsequently identified as + +C. zaps + +on the basis of having a vertical dark line centrally on each body scale, but with these lines being separated from each other and not forming continuous bars. This is a diagnostic character of the species according to +Gill (2004) +. Most meristic and morphometric values for the present specimens lie within the ranges of those of the +holotype +and +paratypes +of + +C. zaps + +given by +Gill (2004) +( +Tables 1–2 +). However, the Yonaguni-jima island specimens differed slightly in morphometric measurements from the type series of + +C. zaps + +as follows: head length 26.4–27.3% SL [ +vs. +23.1–27.0% SL in the latter]; snout length 6.0–6.5% SL ( +vs. +4.8–6.3%); fleshy interorbital width 4.1–5.2% SL ( +vs. +4.5–5.6%); pre-pelvic-fin length 32.0–34.3% SL ( +vs. +29.6–33.4%); distance from posterior tip of retroarticular bone to pelvic-fin origin 17.7– 21.5% SL ( +vs. +17.3–20.5%); distance from pelvic-fin to analfin origin 21.5–25.9% SL ( +vs. +25.3–30.6%); distance from middle dorsal-fin ray base to anal-fin origin 27.5–29.8% SL ( +vs. +26.0–27.9%); second dorsal-fin spine length 3.4–4.4% SL ( +vs. +4.1–5.7%); length of fourth to last segmented dorsalfin ray 16.4% SL ( +vs. +17.7–21.8%); and length of fourth to last segmented anal-fin ray 16.2–18.7% SL ( +vs. +17.1–20.8%) ( +Table 2 +). Since the SL range of the specimens examined in this study was within that of the specimens described by +Gill (2004) +, these minor morphometric differences are regarded as intraspecific variation of + +C. zaps + +. + + +Gill (2004) +provided color descriptions of both fresh and preserved mature male and preserved female specimens of + +C. zaps + +, but did not mention the fresh female coloration. +Allen and Erdmann (2012: 323) +later presented underwater photographs of mature male and female individuals, and indicated sexual coloration differences. All specimens collect- ed from Yonaguni-jima island and those photographed underwater there and elsewhere in Japanese waters were males, the coloration of which agreed well with that of males described by +Gill (2004) +and illustrated by +Allen and Erdmann (2012) +. + + +Although + +C +. + +zaps + + +has been recorded previously from the +Ryukyu Islands +on the basis of underwater photographs (see distribution), the northernmost record of the species based on collected specimens has been considered to be +Green Island +, +Taiwan +(ASIZT P. 57275; BMNH 1999.12.30.1). + +Therefore, the present +three specimens +collected from +Yonaguni-jima island +represent the first records of + +C + + +. zaps +from +Japan +supported by voucher specimens, and the northernmost record of the species. + + +New Japanese names, “Donan-megisu-zoku” and “Donanmegisu”, are herein proposed for the genus and species, respectively, on the basis of +one specimen +(KAUM–I. 78334). The proposed species name is a combination of “donan”, from the local name for Yonaguni-jima island, and “megisu”, the common Japanese name for members of the family +Pseudochromidae +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/48/3760484A5AA5549D8F4776D128D1C6C9.xml b/data/37/60/48/3760484A5AA5549D8F4776D128D1C6C9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..09dd082a561 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/48/3760484A5AA5549D8F4776D128D1C6C9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@ + + + +Additions to Neopestalotiopsis (Amphisphaeriales, Sporocadaceae) fungi: two new species and one new host record from China + + + +Author + +He, Yu-Ke +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3043-0493 +Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand & Department of Plant Pathology, Agriculture College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China & School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand + + + +Author + +Yang, Qi +Department of Plant Pathology, Agriculture College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China + + + +Author + +Sun, Ya-Ru +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5549-1028 +Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand + + + +Author + +Zeng, Xiang-Yu +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1341-1004 +Department of Plant Pathology, Agriculture College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China + + + +Author + +Jayawardena, Ruvishika S. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7702-4885 +Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand + + + +Author + +Hyde, Kevin D. +Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand + + + +Author + +Wang, Yong +Department of Plant Pathology, Agriculture College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China +yongwangbis@aliyun.com + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2022 + +2022-09-28 + + +10 + + +90709 +90709 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e90709 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e90709 +1314-2828-10-e90709 +041DE2270BA253F597EF022F29F25211 + + + + +Neopestalotiopsis zingiberis Y.K. He & Yong Wang bis +sp. nov. + + + +Materials + + +Type status: + +Holotype +. + +Occurrence +: + +recordedBy: + +Yu-ke He + +; occurrenceID: GUCC 21001; + +Taxon +: + +scientificName: +Neopestalotiopsis +zingiberis; order: +Amphisphaeriales +; family: +Sporocadaceae +; genus: +Neopestalotiopsis +; + +Location +: + +country: +China +; stateProvince: +Hainan +; locality: + +Haikou City +, +Wuzhishan Nature Reserve + +; verbatimCoordinates: +109°32' E +, +18°48' N +; +Identification: +identifiedBy: +Yu-ke He +; dateIdentified: 2020; +Record Level: +collectionID: HGUP 10001 + + + + + +Description + +Associated with leaf blight of + +Zingiber officinale + +Rosc. Disease symptom: A long oval to irregular, ring-like scab, light brown, edge reddish-brown, slightly sunken on adaxial surface. The boundary of the scab is obvious, with a narrow yellow halo around the scab. There are many black, small and punctuate conidia on the scab. Sexual state: unknown. Asexual morph (Fig. +3 +): Conidiomata is dark, oblate, scattered on the host scab, 104-202 +μm +. Conidiophores discrete to lageniform, hyaline, smooth- and thin-walled, annellidicae, 12-25 +x +3-6 +μm +(n = 40). Conidia 21-31 +x +6-9.5 +μm +, fusiform to clavate, straight to slightly, 4-septate; basal cell obconic with a truncate base, hyaline or pale brown, smooth- and thin-walled, 3-6 +μm +long; three median cells 15-19 +μm +long, septa and periclinal walls darker than rest of the cell, versicoloured, wall rugose; second cell brown, 4-6 +μm +long; third cell brown, 4-7 +μm +long; fourth cell light brown 4-6 +μm +long; apical cell 3-5 +μm +long, hyaline, conic to acute, with 1-3 tubular appendages insert at different loci, but in the same crest at the apex of the apical cell, unbranched, flexuous, 12-15 +μm +long; most spores have no tubular appendages or single appendage, unbranched, centric, 0-6 +μm +long. + +Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA medium reaching 8-9 cm diam. after 15 d at 24℃, the mycelium is yellowish or white, soft and round with irregular edges. Under the surface of hyphal layer, releasing conidia in a black, slimy mass. Dark brown pigment is deposited on the bottom of the Petri dish. + + +Etymology + + +Neopestalotiopsis zingiberis + +, in reference to the host genus ( + +Zingiber + +) from which it was isolated. + + + +Notes + + +Neopestalotiopsis zingiberis + +(GUCC 21001) formed a distinct clade and sistered to + +Neopestalotiopsis magna + +(MFLUCC 12-0652) (Fig. +1 +). Morphologically, conidia of + +N. zingiberis + +(21-31 +x +6-9.5 +μm +) are smaller than + +N. magna + +(42-46 +x +9.5-12 +μm +) and also differed by having branched, flexuous apical tubular appendages ( +Maharachchikumbura et al. 2014a +) (Table +3 +). Thus, we propose + +N. zingiberis + +as a novel taxon. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF825F43A290C969FA93FD7C.xml b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF825F43A290C969FA93FD7C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3bf6e324e9d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF825F43A290C969FA93FD7C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,299 @@ + + + +Conochironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae) in Asia: new and redescribed species and vouchering issues + + + +Author + +Cranston, Peter S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4109 + + +3 + + +315 +331 + + + +journal article +39119 +10.11646/zootaxa.4109.3.3 +2e25461b-82af-477f-b723-76f3976d0614 +1175-5326 +259767 +CFD3FDAC-B477-4607-9FB7-251DCDB479E9 + + + + + + + +Conochironomus +larvae, +Thailand + + + + + + +Stictochironomus + +sp. sensu + +Sriariyanuwath +et al. +(2015) + +. + +Locations listed North to South; 1 larva at each location unless stated otherwise. All elevations in metres above sea level (GPS determined). + +THAILAND +: Chiang Mai Prov., Fang Horticulture Exp. Farm, +19°57'N +99°09’E +, +17.iii.2002 +(Sites); Chiang Rai. Prov., Doi Laung N.P., +19°26'N +99°41’E +, +26.v.2002 +(CMU team); same as preceding, except: NT Poo Kaeng, +19°26'N +99°42’E +, + +540 m +. + +, +24.vii.2002 +(Courtney); Chang Mai Prov., Doi Suthep-Pui N.P., Huai Kaew, +18°49'N +98°55’E +, +5.iii.2002 +(Cranston); same, except Palad waterfall, +18°47'N +98°58’E +, + +713 m +. + +, +19.x.2004 +, (Vitheepradit, Prommi, Laudee); Chiang Mai, Doi Inthanon NP., Nam Mae Klang, Eco-lodge, +18°32'N +98°32’E +, +1000 m +., +6.x.2002 +(Thamsenanupap); same, except Siriphum lower waterfall, +18°32'N +98°31’E +, +1380 m +., +2.ii.2002 +(Vithepradit, Kirawanchi); same, except stream from Hua Sai Luang W.F., +18°31'N +98°27’E +, +3.iii.2002 +(Vithepradit, Kirawanchi); same, except Mae Klang @ Ban Khun Klang, +18°31'N +98°31’E +, +1296 m +., +18.v.2004 +(DuCharme); 3L, same, except Mae Klang @ Ban Mae Pan Noi, +18°31'N +98°25’E +, + +750 m +. + +, +17.ii.2003 +(Thamsenanupap); Phrae Prov., Heuy Rong, +18°26'N +100°26’E +, + +426 m +. + +, +14.v.2004 +(DuCharme); 2L, same, except Weng Ko Sai N.P., lower NT Mae Kueng Luang, +17°58'N +99°35’E +, + +400 m +. + +, +27.v.2003 +(CMU team); same, except TH75, +22.vii.2002 +(Courtney); same, except +23.iv.2002 +(CMU team); Lamphun Prov., Mae Ping N.P., Namtok Koh Leung, +17°34'N +99°49’E +., +7.iii.2002 +(Courtney); Sakhon Nakorn Prov., Huey Yai waterfall, +17°01'N +103°59’E +, +22.iv. 2004 +(DuCharme); Phitsanulok Prov., Phu Hin Rong Kla N.P., Namtok Rongkla, +16°59'N +101°00’E +, +1190 m +., +11.iii.2002 +, (CMU team); 3L, Phu Hin Rongkla N.P., Waterwheel Falls, +16°59'N +101°00'E +, +1280m +., +9–10.iv.2002 +(Cranston); Chalyaphum Prov., Tad Tone N.P., Tad Tone, +15°58'N +102°02’E +, + +210 m +. + +, +29.iv.2004 +, (DuCharme), same, except L-650 (Vitheepradit) Molecular voucher (MV) TH59; 2L, Nakhon Ratchasima Prov., Khao Yai N.P., Haew Narok Falls, +14°17'N +101°23’E +, + +400 m +. + +, L-601 (Sites & Vitheepradit); +Sra +Keaw Prov., Pang Sida N.P., Klong Huey Nam Yen, +14°02'N +102°15’E +, + +218 m +. + +, +16.iv.2004 +(DuCharme); same, except 3L, Nam Tone waterfall +14°02'N +102°02’E +, + +108 m +. + +, +15.iv.2004 +(DuCharme). + + +Previous molecular voucher. +3rd instar L; +THAILAND +. Chalyaphum Prov., Tad Tone N.P., Tad Tone, +15°58'N +102°02’E +, + +29.iv. +2004 + +, 210 m asl. L-650 (Vitheepradit) (MV) TH59. GenBank# +HQ440724 +(28S), +HQ440888 +( +COI +), +HQ440577 +(18S), +HQ440433 +(CADIV), +HQ440261 +( +CAD +1) (Cranston +et al +., 2012). + + +This 3rd instar larva provided the molecular basis for placement of + +Conochironomus + +in the phylogeny of + +Chironomidae (Cranston +et al +. 2012) + +. Even if features were to be found that differentiate species as mature larvae, this 3rd instar could not be compared to any final instar. Furthermore, Cranston +et al +. (2012) used primers ‘s2183’ and ‘a3014’ after + +Simon +et al +. (1994) + +for the mitochondrial protein-coding gene Cytochrome +c +oxidase subunit I ( +COI +), whereas other regional barcoding studies amplify a different fragment of the gene using universal invertebrate barcoding +COI +primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 ( + +Folmer +et al. +1994 + +), as in + +Pramual +et al. +(2016) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF825F44A290CD0FFEC1FDF0.xml b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF825F44A290CD0FFEC1FDF0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9d90a48449f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF825F44A290CD0FFEC1FDF0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ + + + +Conochironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae) in Asia: new and redescribed species and vouchering issues + + + +Author + +Cranston, Peter S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4109 + + +3 + + +315 +331 + + + +journal article +39119 +10.11646/zootaxa.4109.3.3 +2e25461b-82af-477f-b723-76f3976d0614 +1175-5326 +259767 +CFD3FDAC-B477-4607-9FB7-251DCDB479E9 + + + + + + + +Conochironomus +pupa, ‘Nee Soon’ sp. indet. + +( +Fig. 4 +E). + + + + +P(♀); +SINGAPORE +: Central Catchment, Nee Soon Swamp, +1°23'N +103°48’E +, +13.iii.2009 +(Cranston). + + +This unassociated pupa differs from the putative + +C. tobaterdecimus + +and +C +. ‘Thai’ above in: cephalic tubercles scarcely developed, frontal setae short, dorsal thorax and scutal tubercle strongly rugulose, tergites VII and VIII densely and broadly spinulose, sternites with much reduced spinulation (relative to +Fig. 5 +B), hooklets of row on II smaller and the row occupying only 30% of segment width, pedes spurii B scarcely developed, and posterolateral corner of VIII ( +Fig. 4 +E) with more numerous spines that extend around the segment corner from postero-lateral to fully posterior. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF825F44A290CE43FCD9FADF.xml b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF825F44A290CE43FCD9FADF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..44f8c3d2ffa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF825F44A290CE43FCD9FADF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + +Conochironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae) in Asia: new and redescribed species and vouchering issues + + + +Author + +Cranston, Peter S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4109 + + +3 + + +315 +331 + + + +journal article +39119 +10.11646/zootaxa.4109.3.3 +2e25461b-82af-477f-b723-76f3976d0614 +1175-5326 +259767 +CFD3FDAC-B477-4607-9FB7-251DCDB479E9 + + + + + + + +Conochironomus +larva, ‘Mae Ping’ sp. + +( +Fig. 5 +E, G). + + + + +L; +THAILAND +: Lamphum Prov., Mae Ping N.P., Nam Tok Koh Luang, +17°34'N +98°49’E +, +6.iii.2002 +, L-266, TH73 (Courtney). + + +Head capsule length c. 380, postmentum length 147. Antenna ( +Fig. 5 +E) with segment lengths (base to apex): 50, 18, 19, 14, 8.5, 5; AR 0.77; Lauterborn organs alternate, large, 20–21 long; origin of basal Lauterborn organ broadens apex of segment 2 ( +Fig. 5 +E). Style slender, 9; blade 59 long, not extending to apex of antenna. Mandible 125, with outer tooth as dark as apical tooth; two dark inner teeth; mola has three spines, one close to base of seta subdentalis, two on inner margin. Labrum with SI setae arising from common base; SI, SII plumose; pecten epipharyngis with 4, 2, 4 blunt teeth in 3 closely approximated scales; premandible with 2 strong apical teeth but orientation precludes count of inner teeth; with very strong and long beard. Mentum ( +Fig. 5 +G); total width 95, with cluster of 4 median (ventromental) teeth much smaller and retracted median pair of teeth; all teeth brown. Ventromental plates 21 apart medially, single plate 132 long, anterior margin smooth. + +Abdomen. Anterior parapod claws pale golden, simple, forming dense cluster. Procercus and apical setae yellow. Posterior parapod claws golden brown. Anal papillae 350, each with two obvious constrictions. + +This larva is differentiated from that of + +C. tobaterdecimus + +on antennal features, +i.e. +the Lauterborn organs ( +Fig. 5 +E) being much larger (20 versus 8–9 µm) and with the basal Lauterborn organ placed subapically, the 2nd antennal segment being subequal in length to the 3rd from the lower Antennal Ratio (0.78 versus 0.9–1.0) and the blade not reaching the terminal antennal segment. The reduced size of the median pair of mental teeth may differentiate also, but variation in dorsomental teeth proportions seems high. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF835F44A290CB45FA75FF35.xml b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF835F44A290CB45FA75FF35.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..202a5725766 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF835F44A290CB45FA75FF35.xml @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + +Conochironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae) in Asia: new and redescribed species and vouchering issues + + + +Author + +Cranston, Peter S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4109 + + +3 + + +315 +331 + + + +journal article +39119 +10.11646/zootaxa.4109.3.3 +2e25461b-82af-477f-b723-76f3976d0614 +1175-5326 +259767 +CFD3FDAC-B477-4607-9FB7-251DCDB479E9 + + + + + + + +Conochironomus +pupa, ‘Thai’ sp. indet + +. ( +Fig. 4 +B, D, F). + + + + +Pe; +THAILAND +: Nan Prov., Mae Charim N.P., Nam Wa R., +18°36'N +100°59’E + +335 m +. + +asl., +13.iii.2002 +, L-293 (Cranston). + + +This unassociated pupa clearly belongs to + +Conochironomus + +. It differs from the likely pupa of +C. + + + +tobaterdecimus + +(above) and ‘Nee Soon’ below, and may belong to + +C. nuengthai + +or + +C. sawngthai + +. Differences include the stronger cephalic tubercles and frontal setae ( +Fig. 4 +B), the spinose antepronotum which shows even some small hooklets ( +Fig. 4 +D), and perhaps the posterolateral corner (spur) of abdominal segment VIII ( +Fig. 4 +F). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF845F42A290CCB0FA60FE08.xml b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF845F42A290CCB0FA60FE08.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..04d14978d55 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF845F42A290CCB0FA60FE08.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Conochironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae) in Asia: new and redescribed species and vouchering issues + + + +Author + +Cranston, Peter S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4109 + + +3 + + +315 +331 + + + +journal article +39119 +10.11646/zootaxa.4109.3.3 +2e25461b-82af-477f-b723-76f3976d0614 +1175-5326 +259767 +CFD3FDAC-B477-4607-9FB7-251DCDB479E9 + + + + + + +Key to adult males of Asian + +Conochironomus + + + + + + + + + +1. Wing vein R4+5 with, at most, 1 subapical seta................................... + +C. tobaterdecimus +(Kikuchi & Sasa) + + + + +- Wing vein R4+5 with>10 setae........................................................................... 2 + + + + + +2 Humeral area with 1–2 isolated setae (anterior dorsocentrals). Hypopygium as in +Fig. 2 +B, 3C,D........ + +C. sawngthai + + +sp. n +. + + + + + +- Humeral area bare. Hyopygium differs (e.g. +Fig. 2 +A, 3A,B).................................................... 3 + + + + + + +3 Superior volsella base more-or-less rectangular, with digitiform projection crossing median margin and directed postero- mesally............................................................................... + +‘E.’ +effusus + +Dutta + + + + +- Superior volsella base ovo-cuneate with gently convex inner and posterior margins, with digitiform projection crossing poste- rior margin, curved mesally............................................................... + +C. nuengthai + + +sp. n +. + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF845F42A290CE3DFA71FA63.xml b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF845F42A290CE3DFA71FA63.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..83926c4daa6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF845F42A290CE3DFA71FA63.xml @@ -0,0 +1,193 @@ + + + +Conochironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae) in Asia: new and redescribed species and vouchering issues + + + +Author + +Cranston, Peter S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4109 + + +3 + + +315 +331 + + + +journal article +39119 +10.11646/zootaxa.4109.3.3 +2e25461b-82af-477f-b723-76f3976d0614 +1175-5326 +259767 +CFD3FDAC-B477-4607-9FB7-251DCDB479E9 + + + + + + + +Endochironomus effusus +(Dutta) + + + + + + + + + +Endochironomus effusus +Dutta in + + +Dutta +et al. +(1994 + +: 256 + +) + +. + + + + + +The description and placement of the adult male of + +Endochironomus effusus +Dutta in + +Dutta +et al. +(1994) + + +is based on an inadequate generic concept and does not conform to the diagnosis for + +Endochironomus +Kieffer + +males ( + +Cranston +et al. +1989 + +). The list of features justifying placement of + +E. effusus + +in + +Endochironomus + +does not do so. Features that negate the generic allocation (derived from the description and communication with P.K. Chaudhuri) include that that antepronotal lobes meet dorsally and do not project forward, the rounded foretibial scale lacks any spur, the tibial combs are conical and strong,, the inferior volsella is relatively short, stout and appressed along the inner gonocoxite, the superior volsella has a digitiform process arising from a broad, transverse base, and the gonostylus is fused inflexibly to the gonocoxite. + +Dutta +et al. +(1994) + +appeared unaware that + +Endochironomus acutistilus +Freeman + +, to which they recognised affinity, had been placed by Freeman as the +type +of his genus + +Conochironomus +( +Freeman 1961 +) + +. Although resembling + +Conochironomus + +in described features and additional ones examined by P.K. Chaudhuri (emeritus, Burdwan University, pers. comm. +29 November 2015 +), + +E. effusus + +differs from + +Conochironomus + +, +e.g. +in the purported presence of 2 acrostichals and lack of lateral antepronotals. The hypopygium ( + +Dutta +et al +. 1994 + +: fig. 2d) closely resembles that of C. + +tobaterdecimus + +. Following re-examination of the sole remaining +paratype +of + +Endochironomus effusus + +by P.K. Chaudhuri (pers. comm., 2015, mensural features are similar to those in + +C. tobaterdecimus + +, excepting ‘numerous setae’ on wing vein R4+5, purported presence of acrostichals and lateral antepronotals. However, the specimen is poorly mounted (P.K. Chaudhuri, pers. comm), making it impossible to assess all features required to confirm generic placement in + +Conochironomus + +and it is premature to propose a new generic combination before suitable material becomes available for evaluation. + + +Locations for + +E. effusus + +at 27°N in the Duar foothills of the Himalaya in West Bengal, are at elevations up to + +450 m +. + +a.s.l., which is subtropical-temperate compared to the more tropical habitats of + +Conochironomus + +in Africa and +Australia +. However, the most northerly sites at which definitive + +Conochironomus + +larvae have been found in +Thailand +, at about 19–20°N, are at elevations above +600 m +a.s.l. and also are cool subtropical to warm temperate. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF855F43A290CEC8FE57F8F4.xml b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF855F43A290CEC8FE57F8F4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7fa8a6814cd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF855F43A290CEC8FE57F8F4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ + + + +Conochironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae) in Asia: new and redescribed species and vouchering issues + + + +Author + +Cranston, Peter S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4109 + + +3 + + +315 +331 + + + +journal article +39119 +10.11646/zootaxa.4109.3.3 +2e25461b-82af-477f-b723-76f3976d0614 +1175-5326 +259767 +CFD3FDAC-B477-4607-9FB7-251DCDB479E9 + + + + + + + +Definition and recognition of + +Conochironomus + + + + + + + +Distinctive adult males provided the basis for recognition, originating with Freeman’s (1961) observation that some African species of + +Endochironomus + +were aberrant. Since erection of the genus ( +Freeman 1961 +), the adult male continues to provide strong evidence for generic distinction. +As +stated by +Cranston & Hare (1995) +, amongst taxa in which the male has 13 flagellomeres, lacks acrostichal setae and there is no spur on the anterior tibial apex, the conical shape of the tibial spurs is uniquely diagnostic. In + +Cranston +et al. +(1989) + +, + +Conochironomus + +males possessing median volsellae would key to + +Paratendipes +; + +those without median volsellae key to + +Stictochironomus +. + +Microtrichia extending onto the anal point ( +Fig. 2 +A–C) are distinctive. +Saether (1977: 160) +keyed female + +Conochironomus + +with a diagnostic combination of rounded anterior tibial apical scale, conical mid and hind tibial combs each with spur, six flagellomeres, lack of acrostichals, and gonapophysis VIII with ventrolateral lobe smaller than dorsomesal lobe. The latter observation reflects a higher level of variation in female genitalia in some taxa than documented by +Saether (1977) +, as exemplified in closely related + +Polypedilum + +species ( + +Cranston +et al. +2016 + +). + + +Regionally, pupal + +Conochironomus + +can be recognised by having few (6–8) branches to the thoracic horn, no pedes spurii A, and an unusual, perhaps unique organisation of lateral setae, with the LS fine and short on segments V and VI and anteriorly on VII, and with taeniate LS3, 4 on VII and all LS1–5 on VIII. The posterolateral corner of VIII (‘comb’) in + +Conochironomus + +with few to several small teeth is somewhat distinctive and varies specifically. + + +Larval + +Conochironomus + +appear well-characterised by a six-segmented antenna with Lauterborn organs in alternate apical positions on the second and third segments, and by the distinctive median mentum with four (ventromental) teeth that protrude relative to the lateral, dorsomental components. In the Holarctic key ( + +Epler +et al. +2013 + +) the separation suggested in couplet 9 based on colour intensity of mandibular and mental teeth may not always work in practice, at least outside the Holarctic where there is greater diversity of the corresponding taxa. The arrangement of the median mental teeth in + +Conochironomus + +and the relative length of the antennal flagellum resemble the conditions in some + +Paratendipes + +but this genus differs in the pecten epipharyngis that comprises only 3 simple teeth. In + +Stictochironomus + +, the Australian + +S. fluviatilis +(Skuse) + +and + +S. illawara +Freeman + +fail to conform to the Holarctic diagnosis ( +Cranston 1996 +), and regionally + +Imparipecten +Freeman and Afro-Australian + + +Skusella +Freeman + +also must be considered ( +Cranston 1996 +). Perhaps the only consistent feature differentiating larval + +Conochironomus + +is the shape of the 3rd antennal segment, which is narrow basally alongside the basal Lauterborn organ, and more flared apically. There is an indication of this shape also on the 4th antennal segment beside the apical Lauterborn organ. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF885F4EA290CA8DFAA2F83D.xml b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF885F4EA290CA8DFAA2F83D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2a31314d589 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF885F4EA290CA8DFAA2F83D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ + + + +Conochironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae) in Asia: new and redescribed species and vouchering issues + + + +Author + +Cranston, Peter S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4109 + + +3 + + +315 +331 + + + +journal article +39119 +10.11646/zootaxa.4109.3.3 +2e25461b-82af-477f-b723-76f3976d0614 +1175-5326 +259767 +CFD3FDAC-B477-4607-9FB7-251DCDB479E9 + + + + + + + +Conochironomus +Freeman + + + + + + + + + +Conochironomus +Freeman, 1961 + +( + +Freeman 1961 +: 701 + +, +Cranston & Hare 1995 +). + +Sumatendipes +Kikuchi & Sasa, 1990 +( + +Kikuchi & Sasa 1990: 313 + +) + +. Type-species + +Sumatendipes tobaterdecimus +Kikuchi & Sasa, 1990 + +, by monotypy. +Syn. n. + + + +Type-species +: + +Endochironomus acutistilus +Freeman, 1955 +: 288 + +, by original designation ( +Freeman 1955 +). + + +Other included species +: + +C. australiensis +Cranston & Hare, 1995 + +; + +C. avicula +( +Freeman, 1955 +) + +; + +C. cervus +Cranston & Hare, 1995 + +; + +C. cygnus +Cranston & Hare, 1995 + +; + +C. deemingi +Cranston & Hare, 1995 + +; + +C. kakadu +Cranston & Hare, 1995 + +; + +C. nuengthai + + +sp. n +. + +; + +C. sawngthai + + +sp. n +. + +; + +C. tobaterdecimus +( +Kikuchi & Sasa, 1990 +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF8B5F4CA290C90BFD0BFED1.xml b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF8B5F4CA290C90BFD0BFED1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2660054ba51 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF8B5F4CA290C90BFD0BFED1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +Conochironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae) in Asia: new and redescribed species and vouchering issues + + + +Author + +Cranston, Peter S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4109 + + +3 + + +315 +331 + + + +journal article +39119 +10.11646/zootaxa.4109.3.3 +2e25461b-82af-477f-b723-76f3976d0614 +1175-5326 +259767 +CFD3FDAC-B477-4607-9FB7-251DCDB479E9 + + + + + + + +Conochironomus nuengthai + +sp. n. + + + + +( +Figs. 2 +A; 3A, B) + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1EF933B0-8EC4-4146-A47B-E250E0D9F1B2 + + +Type-material. +Holotype + +: ♂, slide mounted, uncleared, in Euparal (by Reiss), at ZSM; +THAILAND +: Chang Mai, Zoo, +19–26.ii.1990 +(Malicky). + +Paratype + +♂ as +holotype +, except +2–9.iv.1990 +. + + + + +Description +. MALE (n = 2). Body apparently uniformly brown without delimited thoracic vittae (from specimens mounted uncleared into Euparal. All tibiae paler in distal third; tarsomeres missing. Mensural features as in +Table 1 +. Genitalia ( +Figs. 2 +A; 3A, B) with few median anal tergite setae far anterior to broad base of anal point, which tapers evenly to end near level of inferior volsellae apices. Superior volsella characteristic, somewhat cuneate with gently convex inner and posterior margins, microtrichiose across median 1/3 (both dorsal and ventral); inner rounded apex with 2 stronger, medially directed setae (perhaps absent in some specimens); bare digitiform projection arising dorsally near middle of volsella, curving, then narrowing beyond posterior margin of volsella, ending prior to median apex of volsella. Small tubercle near base of gonocoxite. Median volsella absent. Inferior volsella substantially fused to medial margin of gonocoxite, with recurved simple setae, none directed posteriorly. Gonostylus with strong creases on inner surface ( +Fig. 3 +B). + +FEMALE, PUPA, LARVA unknown. + + + +Etymology. +Derived from the +Thai +words +nùeng +and +thai +, meaning the ‘first’ +Thai +species. This combination of a numbering and a location term follows a style used by the group of M. Sasa in naming + +C. tobaterdecimus + +(see below) and many other species. However, this approach to naming is not generally recommended. Epithet is to be treated as noun in apposition for the purposes of nomenclature. + + + + +Remarks +. Both specimens are somewhat damaged, lacking antennae and with no leg complete. Each tibial comb is typical for the genus, with a protruding central spur ( +Cranston & Hare 1995: fig. 1f +). Subtle differences, especially in the shape of the superior volsellae ( +Fig. 3 +A versus +Fig. 3 +C), led F. Reiss (pers. comm. c. 1996) to differentiate this species from the one below. I concur. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF8C5F4AA290CCBFFD26F864.xml b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF8C5F4AA290CCBFFD26F864.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..14a594ca298 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF8C5F4AA290CCBFFD26F864.xml @@ -0,0 +1,367 @@ + + + +Conochironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae) in Asia: new and redescribed species and vouchering issues + + + +Author + +Cranston, Peter S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4109 + + +3 + + +315 +331 + + + +journal article +39119 +10.11646/zootaxa.4109.3.3 +2e25461b-82af-477f-b723-76f3976d0614 +1175-5326 +259767 +CFD3FDAC-B477-4607-9FB7-251DCDB479E9 + + + + + + + +Conochironomus sawngthai + +sp. n. + + + + +( +Figs. 2 +B; 3C, D) + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:9DDC953D-C263-4B0E-B072-5585845067EF + + +Type-material. +Holotype + +: ♂, slide mounted, uncleared, in Euparal (by Reiss), at ZSM; +THAILAND +: Chang Mai, Zoo, +26.iii-5.iii.1990 +(Malicky). + +Paratype + +: ♂ genitalia only, as +holotype +except +23–30.v.1990 +. + + + + +Description +. MALE (n = 1–2). + + +Body apparently uniformly brown with poorly delimited thoracic vittae (specimen mounted uncleared, in Euparal). Tibiae slightly paler in distal third, tarsomeres missing. Mensural features as in +Table 1 +. Genitalia ( +Figs. 2 +B; 3C, D) as compared to + +C. neungthai + + +sp. n. + +with more median anal tergite setae anterior to broad base of anal point, which is parallel sided and slightly spatulate apically. Superior volsella more compressed, parallelogramshaped, with slightly concave inner and posterior margins, microtrichia restricted to narrow medio-basal area, inner point with 2 strong setae at apex; digitiform bare projection arising near middle of volsella, curving medially and more strongly narrowed beyond posterior margin of volsella, projection longer, ending medial to apex of volsella. Median volsella not evident in any form. Inferior volsella extensively fused to medial margin of gonocoxite, with swollen free apex densely covered with thick, recurved, simple setae, none of them directed posteriorly. Gonostylus broader than in + +C. neungthai + + +sp. n. + +, tapering, with more but weaker inner creases ( +Fig. 3 +D), apex slightly bifid due to swollen base of subapical seta. + +FEMALE, PUPA, LARVA unknown. + + + +Etymology. +Derived from the +Thai +words +săwng +and +thai +, meaning the ‘second’ +Thai +species. To be treated as noun in apposition for the purposes of nomenclature. + + + + +Remarks +. The two slide mounted specimens comprise one damaged and incomplete adult male, and an isolated hypopygium on a second slide. On one tibia, likely that of a midleg, the comb has a central spur that is very short relative to that on the other comb. This species subtly differs from C. + +nuengthai + + +sp. n. + +notably in the shape of the superior volsellae ( +Fig. 3 +C versus +Fig. 3 +A). + + + +TABLE 1. +Adult male measurements. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
n=b.l.w.l.A.R.sRsR1sR4+5sqac
+ +C. tobaterdecimus + +holotype (after Kikuchi & Sasa)* +16.52.82.6n/an/an/a80
+ +C. tobaterdecimus +(Singapore) + +1–26.5–6.92.5–2.72.423–2622–230–1110
+C. +"togunagai" Karunakaran* (unavailable name) +?3.22.82.5n/an/an/an/an/a
+ +E. effusus +(Dutta +et al. +) + +* +93.5–4.01.8–2.02.6322822–2410–122
+ +C. neungthai + +sp.n. +1–26.0–6.22.8–2.9n/a27–3323–27176–90
+ +C. sawngthai + +sp.n. +162.42.030161440
continued.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
dcpal.apnsctLR1TIX setae gs.l. gs.R.
+ +C. tobaterdecimus + +holotype 8 (after Kikuchi & Sasa)* +3n/a6n/a?0 220 3.1
+ +C. tobaterdecimus +(Singapore) + +10–11 +34–65–7n/a3–6 205–210 3.3
+C. +"togunagai" Karunakaran* 7 (unavailable name) +n/an/an/a1.4n/a n/a 3.0
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ +E. effusus +(Dutta +et al. +) + +* +9–103–4 n/a81.4n/an/a 3.2
+ +C. neungthai + +sp.n. +9–103 3–59–12n/a3–5200–215 3.6–3.8
+ +C. sawngthai + +sp.n. +9–103 69n/a6170–175 3.0–3.2
+ +* from literature, including measurements from figures. +n/a: not available (not stated in description, or damaged) + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF8F5F45A290CCBFFB42F91E.xml b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF8F5F45A290CCBFFB42F91E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ae725491209 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/7C/37607C47FF8F5F45A290CCBFFB42F91E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,437 @@ + + + +Conochironomus (Diptera: Chironomidae) in Asia: new and redescribed species and vouchering issues + + + +Author + +Cranston, Peter S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4109 + + +3 + + +315 +331 + + + +journal article +39119 +10.11646/zootaxa.4109.3.3 +2e25461b-82af-477f-b723-76f3976d0614 +1175-5326 +259767 +CFD3FDAC-B477-4607-9FB7-251DCDB479E9 + + + + + + + +Conochironomus tobaterdecimus +(Kikuchi & Sasa) + + + + + +( +Figs. 1 +A–E; 2C,D; 3E,F; 4A,C; 5A–C, D, F) + + + + + + +Sumatendipes tobaterdecimus +Kikuchi & Sasa, 1990 +( + +Kikuchi & Sasa 1990: 313 + +) + +. + + + + + +Chironomus +( +Conochironomus +) + +" +tokunagai +" of +Karunakaran (1969) +, unavailable name ( +ICZN 1999: Article 8a +). + +Conochironomus tobaterdecimus +( +Kikuchi & Sasa, 1990 +) + +. +Comb. n. +(merely inferred in + +Cranston 2004 +: 715 + +). + + + + + +Material examined +. All slide mounted in Euparal; +SINGAPORE +: ♂, Bukit Timah N.P., Jungle Falls, +1°21’21”N +103°48’26”E +, +12.iii.2009 +(Cranston); ♂, Bedok Reservoir, Floating deck A, +1°20’N +103°55’E +13.iv.2013 +, emergence trap, CP379 ( +TMSI +team) (GenBank +KU507300 +); ♀, Upper Seletar Reservoir, forest area, +1°24’10”N +103°48’27”E +, emergence trap, +16.vii.2013 +, CP459 ( +TMSI +team) (association by barcode, GenBank 507304); 4L, + +THAILAND + +: Roi Et Prov., Chaturaphak Phiman District, Nong Lad, +15°53'36"N +103°32'54"E +, +1.iii.2012 +(Simwisat) (association by barcode). + + +Putative immature material. +Pupae. Pe, +SINGAPORE +: Bedok Reservoir, NE shore, +1°20’47”N +103°55’31”E +, +23.ii.2012 +(Ang); Larvae. L, +SINGAPORE +: Central Catchment, Nee Soon Swamp, +1°23'N +103°48’E +, +13.iii.2009 +(Cranston); L, same as preceding except +27.ii.2012 +(MV NS +27-2-12 +#1). + + + + +Redescription +(partial; additional material substantially conforms to previous descriptions of all stages in +Karunakaran 1969 +, sub + +Chironomus (Chironomus) tokunagai + +; of male in +Kikuchi & Sasa 1990 +, sub + +Sumatendipes tobaterdecimus + +). + + +MALE ( +Figs. 1 +A–D; 2C; 3E, F) (n = 1–2). Body dark brown with slightly darker delimited thoracic vittae, and paler pronotum, trochanters, femoral apices and distal sections of tibiae ( +Fig.1 +A, B). Mensural features as in +Table 1 +. Genitalia ( +Figs. 1 +D; 2C; 3E, F) with few anal tergite setae located in mid-tergite anterior to base of elongate anal point flanked with lateral setae; anal point tapering to narrower parallel-sided medial section, narrowly rounded at apex. Superior volsella structurally complex ( +Figs. 2 +C, 3E), basal lobe bearing strong microtrichia on median (inner) contour, otherwise smooth; sinuous digitiform projection arises from broad base dorsally on basal lobe, initially dorsally directed, then narrowed and curved medio-posteriorly, terminating in up-turned, rounded tip; Basal lobe without strong setae, digitiform projection bare. Median volsella absent. Inferior volsella basally fused to medial margin of gonocoxite, with swollen free apex densely covered with thick, recurved, simple setae, none directed posteriorly. Gonostylus tapering, with weak inner creases ( +Fig. 3 +F), terminating in rounded apex. + + +FEMALE ( +Figs. 1 +E; 2D) (n = 1). Body length c +5.4 mm +. Antenna: flagellomeres 1–4 500 µm, terminal (5th) 300 µm; AR 0.6. Thoracic setation: ac absent, dc 7, pa 3, sct 6. Wing length 3.0 mm, numbers of setae on wing veins R 34, R1 34, R4+5 40, on sq 14. Genitalia ( +Figs. 1 +E; 2D). Notum thin, long, extending full length of segment, flared posteriorly prior to short rami. Seminal capsules oval, abruptly darkened in distal 1/3 to base of very short neck; spermathecal ducts straight, broad, ending separately. Gonapophysis VIII in ventral view ( +Figs. 1 +E, 2D) clearly divided into large, quadrate, densely chaetose dorsomesal lobe and slightly smaller, rectangular ventrolateral lobe bearing spine-like chaetae on its median submargin, otherwise essentially bare. Cerci elongate rectangular in dorsal view. + + +PUPA ( +Figs. 4 +A,C; 5A–C), based on tentatively associated exuviae (n = 1). Length c. +8 mm +, pale, with brownish margins to thoracic appendages, abdominal segment apophyses indistinct. + + +Cephalothorax. Cephalic tubercle ( +Fig. 4 +A) squat, 12 µm high, with hyaline but strong frontal seta, 50µm. Pedicel sheath with one inner tubercle. Antepronotum dorsally tuberculose, with 1 hyaline dorsal seta; l.apn not visible. Dorsal region of scutum weakly creased, non-rugose; scutal tubercle with tuberculose surface ( +Fig. 4 +C). Thoracic horn hyaline; number of branches not detectable in slide preparation; tracheal bundle simple, ovate. No prealar tubercle. + + + +FIGURE 4. + +Conochironomus + +spp., pupa. A, B. Cephalic tubercles; C. Scutal tubercle; D. Antepronotum; E, F. Posterolateral corner of abdominal segment VIII, ventral). A, C. + +C. tobaterdecimus +(Kikuchi & Sasa) + +; B, D, F. +C. +‘Thai’ sp. indet.; E. +C. +‘Nee Soon’ sp. indet. + + + + +FIGURE 5. + +Conochironomus + +spp., immature stages. A–C. + +C. tobaterdecimus +(Kikuchi & Sasa) + +, pupal abdomen (anal lobe taeniae omitted): A. Dorsal view; B. Segments VII–IX, ventral; C. Posterolateral corner of VIII, ventral. D-G. + +Conochironomus + +spp., Larvae. D. Antenna, + +C. tobaterdecimus + +; E. Antenna, +C. +‘Mae Ping’ sp. indet.; F. Mentum and ventromental plate, + +C. tobaterdecimus + +; G. Mentum (part), +C. +‘Mae Ping’ sp. indet. + + + + +FIGURE 6. + +Conochironomus + +spec. indet., unassociated larvae. A. Antenna, whole; B. Antenna, mid-section; C. Mentum and ventromental plate; D. Mandible; E. Labrum-epipharynx, premandible. + + + +Abdomen. Tergal armament as in +Fig. 5 +A. Segments I and II without spinules. Hook row comprising 55 hooks in uniserial row, extending c. 60% of width of tergite II. Tergite III with wide and deep area of spinules, this area smaller and ending more anteriorly on T IV and V, T VI with anterior transverse band only, T VII without spinules; T VIII with antero-medial transverse patch, T IX with wide patch of spinules. Conjunctives bare. Most sternites bare, S VII and VIII with large quadrate area of spinules ( +Fig. 5 +B). Caudolateral corner of segment VIII ventrally with 4–5 transversely aligned, basally fused, straight spines ( +Fig. 5 +C). Pedes spurii B strong on segment II, absent on III. Pedes spurii A (vortices) absent. Segments V–VIII with 0, 0, 2, 5 taeniate lateral setae. Anal lobe dorsally with broad spinulose area ( +Fig. 5 +A, B) with multiserial fringe of c. 100 taeniae (not shown), without dorsal seta. + + +LARVA ( +Fig. 5 +, D, F; 6A–E) (n = 4). Conforms to generic diagnosis ( +Cranston & Hare 1995 +) and closely resembles Australian + +C. australiensis + +. Body length c. +7–9 mm +. + + +Head capsule with dark postoccipital margin; most of postmentum and posterior 1/3 of head darkened, anteriorly paler yellow-brown. Eye double, with larger spot exactly dorsal to smaller ventral spot. Body red, claws golden to golden brown (posterior). Head capsule length c. 490–530, postmentum length 164–180. Dorsal head and frontoclypeal apotome as in +Cranston & Hare (1995: fig. 7h) +; Antenna ( +Fig. 5 +D; +Cranston & Hare 1995 +: fig 7e) with segment lengths (base to apex): 68–75; 13–15; 18–22; 8–12; 5–7. AR 0.9–1.2; Lauterborn organs large, alternate, 8–9 long; style slender, 10 long; blade 78–82 long, extending to apical segment or slightly beyond. Mandible (identical to +Fig. 6 +D; +Cranston & Hare 1995 +: fig. 7f) 155–165, with somewhat darkened outer tooth as long as dark apical tooth; two dark inner teeth; mola includes small darkened distal area close to base of long, simple seta subdentalis. Labrum (as in +Cranston & Hare 1995 +: fig. +7g +) with SI setae arising from common, fused bases (illustrated but not stated in +Cranston & Hare 1995 +); SI and SII finely plumose; pecten epipharyngis of 3 separated scales, each with 2–3 blunt teeth; premandible 87–92, with 3 well-developed teeth and small basal 4th tooth. Mentum ( +Fig. 5 +F; +Cranston & Hare 1995 +: fig. 7a–d) total width 130–152, with 4 median (ventromental) teeth, varying in relative height of median pair of teeth ( +1 specimen +has only 3 teeth; + +Pramual +et al. +2016 + +: fig. 4), and varying in pigment intensity from yellow-brown to as dark as lateral (dorsomental) teeth. Ventromental plate ( +Fig. 5 +F) 62–65 apart medially, single plate 162–178 long, with characteristic ultrastructure ( +Cranston & Hare 1995: fig. 7b +) and variably wavy anterior margin. + +Abdomen. Anterior parapod claws simple, forming dense cluster. Procercus and supraanal setae pale-mid brown. + + + +Remarks. +Type +material of + +Sumatendipes tobaterdecimus + +was not examined. Recognition, including membership of + +Conochironomus + +, is based on the description and drawings of +Kikuchi & Sasa (1990) +, plus images of the +holotype +male genitalia available at http://www. +type +.kahaku.go.jp/TypeDB (species name misspelled 'tobaterdecumus'). The anal point of the +type +appears to differ in shape from Singaporean males, but this may arise from the poor preparation and distortion of the specimen (as too often in material from Sasa’s studies). + + +Identical DNA barcoding +COI +sequences allow association of an adult male and female from +Singapore +(above). Larvae of + +Conochironomus + +collected from Nee Soon ( +Singapore +) provided no DNA capable of allowing further association; thus, larvae (and pupae) are associated only putatively with + +C. tobaterdecimus + +. Later five larval specimens (CP461 from Bedok reservoir; CP1136, 1137, 1716, 1245 from Upper Seletar Reservoir) yielded barcodes identical to + +C. tobaterdecimus + +(GenBank accessions +KU507299 +, +KU507301 +-3, +KU507305 +, respectively) but have not been examined by the author. Two larvae sequenced for barcode +COI +by + +Pramual +et al. +(2016 + +, GenBank codes +KT213039 +and +KT213040 +) are less than 1.5% different from adult + +C. tobaterdecimus + +from +Singapore +. This value lies well within the values of 4–5% taken to reflect species differences in + +Tanytarsus +( + +Lin +et al. +2015 + +) + +and found appropriate in + +Cricotopus +( + +Krosch +et al. +2015 + +) + +; this boundary may have applicability across all +Chironomidae +. Unfortunately vouchers were not retained (P. Pramual, pers. comm. 2015) and morphology had to be derived from photographs of menta. However, further specimens from the same locality have been provided for morphometrics and barcoding, confirming association with + +C. tobaterdecimus + +from +Singapore +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/96/376096AE322F5B0F9F5E020E0C1D506E.xml b/data/37/60/96/376096AE322F5B0F9F5E020E0C1D506E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b28b8f7c7bb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/96/376096AE322F5B0F9F5E020E0C1D506E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ + + + +Typification and taxonomic status re-evaluation of 15 taxon names within the species complex Cymbella affinis / tumidula / turgidula (Cymbellaceae, Bacillariophyta) + + + +Author + +Silva, Weliton Jose da +Labfico, Departamento de Botanica, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil & Programa de Pos-graduacao em Biodiversidade Vegetal, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal de Goias, Goiania, Brazil +welitondasilva@yahoo.com.br + + + +Author + +Jahn, Regine +Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany + + + +Author + +Ludwig, Thelma Alvim Veiga +Departamento de Botanica, Setor de Ciencias Biologicas, Centro Politecnico, Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil + + + +Author + +Hinz, Friedel +Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum fuer Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany + + + +Author + +Menezes, Mariangela +Labfico, Departamento de Botanica, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2015 + +2015-07-21 + + +53 + + +1 +25 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.53.4782 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.53.4782 +1314-2003-53-1 +FFDFFFE0FFC6FFE9C931FFEFFF8CFF9F +576274 + + + + +Cymbella tumidula var. salinarum Grunow + + + + +Cymbella tumidula var. salinarum +(Grunow) Cleve, Kongl. Svenska Vetensk.-Akad. Handl., ser. 4, 26(2): 171, 1894. + + + +Basionym. + + +Cymbella salinarum + +Grunow in Schmidt, A. +Schmidt's +Atlas Diatom.-Kunde, Pl. 9, fig. 28, 1875. + + + +Holotype. +Preparation 1603 in the Grunow Collection in the Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (W). + + +Lectotype + +(designated here). +An individual on preparation 1603, in the Grunow Collection in the Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (W), represented by the illustration in +Krammer (2002 +, Fig. 25: 13). + + + +Type locality. +Salinen von Zaule (Trieste, Italy). + +Valves lanceolate, dorsiventral, dorsal and ventral margins convex; ends subcapitate; length 34.0 +µm +, breadth 10.7 +µm +, L/B ratio 3.2; axial area linear-lanceolate, slightly arched, central area rounded; striae 14 in 10 +µm +, becoming 15 toward ends, 1 isolated pore. + + + +Remarks. + +This taxon presents morphometric characteristics similar to +Cymbella tumidula var. tumidula +, except it has wider valves. +Cleve (1894) +recorded specimens of +Cymbella tumidula var. salinarum +with 27-40 +µm +length, 8-10 +µm +breadth, and 11 or 12 striae in 10 +µm +, and considered that the only difference between this taxon and +Cymbella tumidula var. tumidula +was the shape of the ends. Although in poor condition, in preparation 1603 we did not find differences between the shape of the valvar ends of the variety + +salinarum + +and the nominate variety. However, +Cymbella tumidula var. salinarum +has higher breadth values compared to the type population of +Cymbella tumidula var. tumidula +, even in populations of this taxon as recorded by +Krammer (2002) +from Falaise where initial and post initial cells were found. Moreover, the occurrence of +Cymbella tumidula var. salinarum +has been restricted to brackish waters. + + +Krammer (2002 +, Fig. 25: 13) provided the illustration of an individual of the type of + +Cymbella salinarum + +. The individual represented by him (Krammer 2000) was similar to +Cymbella tumidula var. tumidula +. However, it was larger and had only one isolated pore, differing from + +Cymbella tumidula + +, which has more than two isolated pores (Figs +50-56 +). Thus, in contrast to +Krammer (2002) +, who treated + +Cymbella salinarum + +at the specific level, we consider this taxon at the infraspecific rank as did +Cleve (1894) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/60/AF/3760AF4491D08A554F1F548227B1296A.xml b/data/37/60/AF/3760AF4491D08A554F1F548227B1296A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1a83f80c95e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/60/AF/3760AF4491D08A554F1F548227B1296A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ + + + +On the Austral-Antarctic stenothoids Proboloides, Metopoides, Torometopa and Scaphodactylus (Crustacea Amphipoda) Part 2: the genus Proboloides, with description of two new genera and the transfer of two nominal species to Metopoides + + + +Author + +Krapp-Schickel, Traudl + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +86 + + +11 +45 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.86.785 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.86.785 +1313-2970-86-11 + + + + +Metopoides typicus (Walker, 1906) +Figs 34 + + + + +Proboliella typica +Walker 1906 +: 14; 1907: 20-21 t.6 fig. 10 + + +Proboloides typica +Schellenberg 1926 +: 323-24 fig, 41; +De Broyer et al. 2007 +: 213 not +Proboloides typica +KH. +Barnard 1932 +: 109, f. 57 + + +Metopoides +sp. +Bellan-Santini and Ledoyer 1974 +: 700 fig. 38 B + + + +Material examined: + +Cape Bird, EBS, C3-C4, 70-100m, 14.12. 1971, several spec.; tide crack, near Cape Spencer, White Island, Ross Ice Shelf, 78°01'0"S, 167°20'0"E, 28.XII. 1976, coll. P. Ensor (AMS P 25504); Southern Rookery, Cape Bird, Ross Island, Antarctica (approx. 77°13'0"S, 166°27'0"E) AM P.80875 (1 slide); slide of " +Metopoides +sp. ", Kerguelen,MNVCR. + + + +Redescription after material from the Australian and Verona Museum: + +Body +smooth. Eyes rounded, medium size. + + +Length. +3-3,5 mm. + + +Antennae. +A1 less than 2/3 of body length, peduncle robust, art 1 shorter than three times wide; acc. flag. with 2 (very small) articles, flagellum 10 arts. A2 subequal in length to A1, peduncle robust, art 4 somewhat> art 5, flagellum about as long as peduncle art 5, with 7 arts (Walker: without acc. flag., A1 reaching to the middle of the flagellum of A2). + + +Mouthparts. +Md incisor and raker spine row well developed; no clear molar cusp; palp with 3 arts, art 3 about 1/3-1/2 length of art 2, with 3 distal long setae (Walker: Md palp lacking third art, therefore creating a new genus Proboliella; but Schellenberg already noticed 1926: 323 fig. 41, that there is a well-developed third article). Mx 1 IP with 1 distal seta, OP with 6 strong robust setae, palp with 2 arts; Mx 2 inner plate ordinary, shorter than outer; Mxp IP not fused, 2/3 length of ischium; OP narrow, well developed, reaching more than half of merus length; dactylus long, subequal to propodus. + + +Coxae. +Cx2 with rounded anterior margin straight behind, angle rounded with small tooth; Cx3 narrow with parallel margins, Cx4 not excavated, inferior and posterior margin rounded, about as long as wide. + + +Gnathopods. +Gn1, 2 propodi different in size and shape. Gn1 dactylus ordinary; propodus with parallel margins, palm well defined (corner about 120°), somewhat longer than half length of propodus, about twice as long as wide; carpus shorter than propodus, triangular, longer than wide, merus incipiently chelate. Gn2 length of propodus more than 2/3 of basis in male, less in female; propodus subelliptical, twice the size of propodus Gn1; hind margin half length of palm which is in male and female with incisions, palmar corner well defined by acute tooth-shaped prolongation and U-shaped incision. Dactylus clearly shorter than palm, probably working together with robust setae of palmar corner. Gn2 carpus shorter than wide, cup-shaped, merus not lobate. + + +Peraeopods. +P4 merus anterodistal margin somewhat lengthened. P5 dactylus long, weak, much longer than half of slim propodus; merus posterodistal margin not reaching half of carpus length, basis slender without lobe. P6 basis hind margin harmonically rounded, clearly longer than wide, merus posterodistal corner acutely lengthened but not widened, not reaching to half of carpus length. P7 basis and merus similar to P6. + + + +Epimeral +plates. + +Ep3 posterodistally lengthened to triangular corner. + + +Uropods. + +U1 peduncle slightly longer than subequal rami, with many robust setae; U2 peduncle longer than shorter ramus, rami clearly unequal; U3 peduncle shorter than ramus, first article of ramus shorter than peduncle, ramus art 2 about +3/4 +of art 1. + + + + +Telson +. + +Not reaching end of peduncle U3; about twice as long as wide; distally triangulary pointed, medio-laterally with 2-3 robust setae. + + + +Sexual differences. +Probably small. + + +Distribution. + +Antarctica, Hut Point near Mc Murdo, 77.47°S ( +Walker 1906 +, 1907); S-Victoria Land, +Gauss +Station ( +Schellenberg 1926 +); White Island, Ross Ice Shelf, 78°01'0"S, 167°20'0"E, (AMS P 25504); Cape Bird, Ross Island, Southern Rookery, 77°13'0"S, 166°28'0"E (AMS P 80875). + + + +Ecology. +Steeply sloping rock bottom with encrusted bryozoans and hydroids. + + +Remarks: + +As this species clearly has an accessory flagellum (although tiny), unspecialized gnathopod propodi and neither much lengthened nor widened merus on P5-7, it has to be placed in the genus Metopoides, and even is a very +"typical" +representative of that genus. + + + +Figure 3. +Metopoides typicus +(Walker, 1906): Cape Bird, Southern Rookery; AMS. + + + + +Figure 4. +Metopoides typicus +(Walker, 1906): Cape Bird, Southern Rookery; AMS. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/61/0A/37610AEDE1A06C1183CF4FE37C664F81.xml b/data/37/61/0A/37610AEDE1A06C1183CF4FE37C664F81.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..31ab89c996b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/61/0A/37610AEDE1A06C1183CF4FE37C664F81.xml @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + +Frit flies of Turkey with descriptions of two new species and new records (Diptera, Chloropidae) + + + +Author + +Kubik, Stepan + + + +Author + +Bartak, Miroslav + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +667 + + +131 +154 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.667.10758 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.667.10758 +1313-2970-667-131 +A6C9E9664BCF48C6955688F9262BC0AF + + + + +* +Meromyza pluriseta Peterfi, 1961 + + + +Material examined. + +Turkey: +Goekceova +Goelue +, lake shore, 1 750 m, +37°03'42.52"N +, +28°48'28.42"E +, 20.ix.2012, 6M; Turkey: 8 km S of +Cine +, river bank, 68 m, +37°32'34"N +, +28°03'46"E +, 21.ix.2012, 4M and 2F. + + + +Distribution. +Palaearctic species. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/61/0C/37610CF1FD1CF485054D2F8316A917CC.xml b/data/37/61/0C/37610CF1FD1CF485054D2F8316A917CC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bd710d0d6fe --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/61/0C/37610CF1FD1CF485054D2F8316A917CC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Papilio vanillae +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + + +P. N. alis dentatis flavis nigro-maculatis; subtus maculis XXX argenteis. +M. L. U. + + +Merian. surin. +25. +t. +25. + + +Sloan. jam. +2. +t. +239. +f. +23, 24. + + + + +Habitat in +Epidendro Vanilla +Americes. + + + + +Alae maculis argenteis primorum +7, +posticarum +22. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/61/5E/37615E7BCC160ED4ACBEB5FA63014700.xml b/data/37/61/5E/37615E7BCC160ED4ACBEB5FA63014700.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..933deb5b901 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/61/5E/37615E7BCC160ED4ACBEB5FA63014700.xml @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ + + + +Hymenoptera. Fam. Formicidae. Subfam. Myrmicinae. [part] + + + +Author + +Emery, C. + +text + + +Genera Insectorum + + +1921 + +174 + + +1 +94 + + + +journal article +3891 +10.5281/zenodo.11471 + + + + + +Aphaenogaster (Ischnomyrmex) +swammerdami var. spinipes Santschi + + + + + + +var. spinipes, Santschi +, Rev. Suisse Zool. Vol. 19, p. 123 (1911) ☿ + + + + + +Madagascar: Prov. +d'Ankavandro +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/61/A8/3761A83084371FAAD847F43A0F8C573B.xml b/data/37/61/A8/3761A83084371FAAD847F43A0F8C573B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2e284888a47 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/61/A8/3761A83084371FAAD847F43A0F8C573B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +One hundred and one new species of Trigonopterus weevils from New Guinea + + + +Author + +Riedel, Alexander + + + +Author + +Sagata, Katayo + + + +Author + +Surbakti, Suriani + + + +Author + +Rene Taenzler, + + + +Author + +Michael Balke, + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +280 + + +1 +150 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.280.3906 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.280.3906 +1313-2970-280-1 + + + + +98 +. +Trigonopterus viridescens Riedel +sp. n. + + + +Diagnostic description. +Holotype, male (Fig. 98a). Length 2.86 mm. Color black with marked greenish lustre. Body slender, ovate; without constriction between pronotum and elytron; in profile evenly convex. Rostrum weakly sculptured, dorsally in basal half with pair of shallow sublateral furrows, with sparse rows of mesad-directed scales, sparsely punctate. Forehead laterally with pair of cavities bordering eyes. Eyes with dorsal margin carinate. Pronotum subglabrous, sparsely punctate with minute punctures. Elytra subglabrous, striae hardly visible. Femora subglabrous, sparsely punctate and squamose, without teeth. Metafemur with smooth dorsoposterior edge; subapically without stridulatory patch. Mesotibia subapically with premucro larger than uncus. Metatibia with premucro somewhat smaller than uncus. Aedeagus (Fig. 98b). Apex symmetrical, with median, pointed extension; transfer apparatus spiniform, apically bordered by pair of curved sclerites; ductus ejaculatorius without bulbus. Intraspecific variation. Length 2.48-3.05 mm. Female meso- and metatibia subapically with minute premucro. + + +Material examined. + +Holotype (MZB): ARC0434 (EMBL # FN429145), WEST NEW GUINEA, Jayapura Reg., Cyclops Mts, Sentani, +S02°31.2' +, +E140°30.5' +, 1420-1520 m, 30-XI-2007, beaten. Paratypes (ARC, SMNK, ZSM): WEST NEW GUINEA, Jayapura Reg., Cyclops Mts, Sentani: 2 exx, ARC0433 (EMBL # FN429144), ARC0435 (EMBL # FN429146), same data as holotype; 1 ex, 1100-1600 m, 05-X-1991; 5 exx, ARC0671 (PCR failed), ARC0672 (PCR failed), +S02°31.3' +, +E140°30.5' +, 1200-1420 m, 30-XI-2007. + + + +Distribution. +Jayapura Reg. (Cyclops Mts). Elevation: 1420-1520 m. + + +Biology. +Collected by beating foliage in montane crippled forests. + + +Etymology. + +This epithet is based on the Latin participle viridescens (greenish) and refers to the +species' +coloration. + + + +Notes. + +Trigonopterus viridescens +Riedel, sp. n. was coded as " +Trigonopterus +sp. 24" by +Riedel et al. (2010) +and + +Taenzler +et al. (2012) + +, respectively " +Trigonopterus +spx" in the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ databases. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/61/D9/3761D94E1B8B01A250C1230CDA84A6DC.xml b/data/37/61/D9/3761D94E1B8B01A250C1230CDA84A6DC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f2364073767 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/61/D9/3761D94E1B8B01A250C1230CDA84A6DC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + +Polychaetes of Greece: an updated and annotated checklist + + + +Author + +Faulwetter, Sarah + + + +Author + +Simboura, Nomiki + + + +Author + +Katsiaras, Nikolaos + + + +Author + +Chatzigeorgiou, Giorgos + + + +Author + +Arvanitidis, Christos + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2017 + +5 + + +20997 +20997 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 +1314-2828-5-20997 + + + + +Oligognathus bonelliae Spengel, 1882 + + + +Ecological interactions + +Parasite of + +Bonellia viridis +Rolando, 1822 + + + + +Notes + +Oligognathus bonelliae +can be found in host bodies of the echiurid +Bonellia viridis +. Type locality: Mediterranean (Gulf of Naples). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/62/92/37629288F3A1A605844D2DA8A1146F2A.xml b/data/37/62/92/37629288F3A1A605844D2DA8A1146F2A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..624bc3cd2cb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/62/92/37629288F3A1A605844D2DA8A1146F2A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +bousquety1@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-11-28 + + +245 + + +1 +1722 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 +1313-2970-245-1 +FFFF52503A0AFF882450FFB66D45FF8E +578462 + + + + +Polyderis rufotestacea (Hayward, 1900) + + + + +Tachys rufotestaceus +Hayward, 1900: 217. Type locality: "Pom[ona] [Los Angeles County], Cal[ifornia]" (lectotype label). Lectotype (♂), designated by Erwin (1974a: 144), in MCZ [# 7052]. + + + +Distribution. +This species is known from central Idaho (Custer County, Ken Karns pers. comm. 2009), southeastern Oregon (Malheur County, James R. LaBonte pers. comm. 1992), California, from Lake County (CAS) to Riverside County (CAS) east to Mono and Inyo Counties (CAS; Dajoz 2007: 18), southern Arizona (Cochise and Maricopa Counties, CMNH; Hayward 1900: 217), southern Texas (Zapata County, CMNH; Casey 1918: 211), northwestern Arkansas (Newton County, Peter W. Messer pers. comm. 2008), and eastern South Dakota (Kirk and Balsbaugh 1975: 21; French et al. 2004: 557). The record from Aklavik in northern Northwest Territories (Lindroth 1966: 427) is quite obviously based on a mislabeled specimen. + + +Records. + +USA +: AR, AZ, CA, ID, OR, SD, TX + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/62/A7/3762A7C043F01CE2CCF9395AA91FB92D.xml b/data/37/62/A7/3762A7C043F01CE2CCF9395AA91FB92D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e8b388abe22 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/62/A7/3762A7C043F01CE2CCF9395AA91FB92D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Polychaetes of Greece: an updated and annotated checklist + + + +Author + +Faulwetter, Sarah + + + +Author + +Simboura, Nomiki + + + +Author + +Katsiaras, Nikolaos + + + +Author + +Chatzigeorgiou, Giorgos + + + +Author + +Arvanitidis, Christos + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2017 + +5 + + +20997 +20997 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 +1314-2828--20997 + + + + +Glycera unicornis Lamarck, 1818 + + + +Notes + +See notes under +Glycera rouxii +Audouin & Milne Edwards, 1833. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/62/D3/3762D34B3E23B66E890FD7CF3B493AEE.xml b/data/37/62/D3/3762D34B3E23B66E890FD7CF3B493AEE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..631d8df08c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/62/D3/3762D34B3E23B66E890FD7CF3B493AEE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + +A nomenclator of extant and fossil taxa of the Melanopsidae (Gastropoda, Cerithioidea) + + + +Author + +Neubauer, Thomas A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-9941 +Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria +thomas.neubauer@nhm-wien.ac.at + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +2016-07-05 + + +602 + + +1 +358 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 +1313-2970-602-1 +65EFA27673454AC69B78DBE7E98D6103 +FFA86D39FFE2FFF3FF8AFFEBC209FFDE +126863 + + + + +† +Melanopsis phanesiana Bukowski, 1892 + + + +Original source. + +Bukowski 1892 +: 249. + + + +Type horizon. +Salakos Formation, Pliocene. + + +Type locality. + +"Rhodos" +(locality specified as +"Kalavarda" +in +Bukowski 1893 +), Greece. + + + +Remarks. + +Willmann (1981 +: 127) considered this taxon as a synonym of + +Melanopsis vandeveldi + +Bukowski, 1892. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/63/12/37631284F29359FC9CE5C0729E4C9404.xml b/data/37/63/12/37631284F29359FC9CE5C0729E4C9404.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6a133003915 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/63/12/37631284F29359FC9CE5C0729E4C9404.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Distribution and diversity of cyanobacteria in the Azores Archipelago: An annotated checklist + + + +Author + +Luz, Ruben +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8223-5943 +CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Polo dos Acores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal & Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Universidade dos Acores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal +ruben.fs.luz@uac.pt + + + +Author + +Cordeiro, Rita +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8713-6370 +Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Universidade dos Acores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal & CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Polo dos Acores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal + + + +Author + +Fonseca, Amelia +Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Universidade dos Acores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal & CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Polo dos Acores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal + + + +Author + +Raposeiro, Pedro Miguel +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7461-0851 +CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Polo dos Acores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal & Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Universidade dos Acores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal + + + +Author + +Goncalves, Vitor +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5737-296X +CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Polo dos Acores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal & Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Universidade dos Acores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2022 + +2022-09-02 + + +10 + + +87638 +87638 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e87638 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e87638 +1314-2828-10-e87638 +55C420C93F325235975942C6C2498AC3 + + + + +Pseudanabaena minima (G.S.An) Anagnostidis, 2001 + + + +Distribution + +Pico ( +Luz 2018 +) + + + +Notes +Freshwater (lake) + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/63/16/37631659194019B90D63BB9B86542E96.xml b/data/37/63/16/37631659194019B90D63BB9B86542E96.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..918e52bbf36 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/63/16/37631659194019B90D63BB9B86542E96.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Muridae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +1189 +1531 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + + +Haeromys margarettae +(Thomas 1893) + + + + + + + +[Mus] margarettae +Thomas 1893 + +, +Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 6, 11: 346 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +Malaysia +, +Sarawak +, Penrisen Hills. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Margaret's Haeromys +. + + + + +Distribution: +Borneo; recorded only from the type locality and +Sabah +( +Chasen and Kloss, 1932 +). + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +– Vulnerable. + + + + +Discussion: +Known only by the +holotype +( +BMNH +93.4.1.55) and a specimen from Bettotan in +Sabah +( +RMBR +4.7900); Medway’s (1977) record from +East Kalimantan +is a nestling of + +Sundamys muelleri + +( +ZMO +8226, identified by Musser). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/63/1A/37631AAABF6F58889930B3D690E6A46D.xml b/data/37/63/1A/37631AAABF6F58889930B3D690E6A46D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..460ecb81ea1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/63/1A/37631AAABF6F58889930B3D690E6A46D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ + + + +An annotated checklist of millipede fauna from Slovakia, with ecological and biogeographic characteristics + + + +Author + +Haľkova, Beata +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7649-0956 +Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Faculty of Science, Kosice, Slovakia +halkova.beata@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Drabova, Martina +Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Faculty of Science, Kosice, Slovakia + + + +Author + +Mock, Andrej +Pavol Jozef Safarik University, Faculty of Science, Kosice, Slovakia + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2021 + +2021-09-09 + + +9 + + +71495 +71495 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e71495 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e71495 +1314-2828-9-e71495 +142E311FA0BA563085242EE750845802 + + + + +Leptoiulus liptauensis (Verhoeff, 1899) + + + +Distribution +West Carpathian + + +Notes +R, e, m + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/63/77/3763770B077E8C47C09E21CA2694F21D.xml b/data/37/63/77/3763770B077E8C47C09E21CA2694F21D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c3e75215063 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/63/77/3763770B077E8C47C09E21CA2694F21D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1712 @@ + + + +A revision of the giant Amazonian ants of the genus Dinoponera (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) + + + +Author + +Lenhart, Paul A. +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, 2475 TAMU, College Station, Texas USA + + + +Author + +Dash, Shawn T. +Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University Avenue, El Paso, Texas 79968 + + + +Author + +Mackay, William P. +Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University Avenue, El Paso, Texas 79968 + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2013 + +2013-03-20 + + +31 + + +119 +164 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.31.4335 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.31.4335 +1314-2607-31-119 +10404A9C126A44C8BD485DB72CD3E3FF +632BFFBC244FFF88656EFFBEFF8DFFA7 +574808 + + + + +Genus +Dinoponera Roger, 1861 + + + + +Family +Formicidae +, subfamily +Ponerinae +, tribe +Ponerini +. Described by +Perty (1833) +as + +Ponera gigantea + +. Defined as a genus by +Roger (1861) +(Type species: + +Dinoponera gigantea + +) + + + +Diagnosis. + +Size (TBL> 2.5cm) can easily distinguish + +Dinoponera + +from other worker ants. Two laterally projecting clypeal teeth ( +Fig. 1A +) and rows of spines on the pygidium and hypopygidium will further distinguish this genus. The gamergates of + +Dinoponera + +are not distinct from workers in their external morphology ( +Haskins and Zahl 1971 +, +Araujo et al. 1990 +, + +Paiva and +Brandao +1995 + +, +Monnin and Peeters 1998 +). True gynes have not been found in this genus. + + + +Figure 1. +Features of + +Dinoponera + +workers. +A +Head, frontal view +B-C +Occiput of head, oblique antero-lateral view +D-E +Pronotum, lateral view +F-H +Petiole, lateral view. +A-B + +Dinoponera longipes + +C + +Dinoponera hispida + +D + +Dinoponera gigantea + +. +E-F + +Dinoponera mutica + +G + +Dinoponera hispida + +H + +Dinoponera lucida + +. + + + + +Description of the worker. + +Abundant setae; black integument, ranges from smooth and shiny with no microsculpturing, to finely micropunctate or scaled depending on species ( +Fig. 12 +). Head: Mandibles long and curved posteriorly in side view; seven large teeth; erect setae on dorsum. Ventral surface of head with sparse decumbent and subdecumbent setae; may have fine striations depending on species; Papal formula 4, 4; large bilobed labrum. Clypeus with two laterally projecting teeth on anterior edge, clypeus bulging medially, extending posteriorly between frontal lobes, anterior edge with row of long setae; sparse appressed setae from distal edges to medial area of clypeus. Area posterior to clypeus with varying amounts of striation. Tentorial pits apparent. Frontal lobes raised and conspicuous, with striations at posterior constriction. Antennae: geniculate, 12 segments, all with flagellate setae; scape long, extending past posterior border of head; funiculus covered in minute appressed pubescence. Gena depressed medially of eye; dense appressed setae on the antero-lateral sides of the head; covered in conflected punctulate sculpturing. Eyes large, elliptical with slight depression (ocular ring) around circumference. Frons with large pads of long flagellate pubescence (lost in older or poorly curated specimens). Median furrow running from posterior termination of clypeus, between frontal lobes to center of frons, terminates in shallow pit in most specimens. Entire head covered in long flagellate subdecumbent setae ( +Fig. 1A +). Mesosoma: in lateral view weakly convex; covered in long subdecumbent to erect flagellate pilosity and dense pubescence; pronotal disc with slight bulges; promesonotal suture distinct, suture between mesopleuron and propodeum distinct; mesonotum fused with propodeum and episternum, separated by slight furrows; basilar sclerite large, ovaloid; propodeum with broadly rounded dorsal outline, dorsal surface gradually curves into posterior face ( +Fig. 2 +); propodeal spiracle forms nearly vertical slit; sulcus running from center of propodeum along lower edge of propodeal spiracle to posterior edge of propodeum at dorsal edge of bulla, patches of short white pubescence at curved posterior border of pronotum and basilar sclerite. Legs long, covered in long setae with short, stiff pubescence. One well-developed, antennae cleaning, comb-like spur on foreleg; one spine-like appendage and one less +developed +denticular comb on mesothoracic tibia; one spine and one comb-like spur on hind tibia. Posterior side of fore leg basitarsus with dense pads of golden setae; tarsal claws bidentate. Petiole: node large and tabular in lateral view, narrow attachments at base to propodeum and gaster; in dorsal view largest width less than propodeum and gaster, varies from ovate rectangular to ovate triangular in outline; covered in long subdecumbent to erect flagellate pilosity; pubescence on anterior face and ridges of subpetiolar process; subpetiolar process reduced, slightly variable between species. Gaster: typical of ponerines; covered with flagellate setae with short pubescence; small protuberance at articulation of gastric sternite III and the petiole; stridulatory file of +varying +size on acrotergite of gastral tergum II; posterior edges of the pygidium and hypopygidium with characteristic rows of minute spines. + + + +Description of the male. + +Integument: smooth and nitid; reddish to dark brown/black. Head: Mandibles greatly reduced, rounded, spoon shaped, lacking teeth; palps elongated, maxillary palps 4 segmented, labial palps 3 segmented; labrum reduced, rounded to truncate, emarginated distal margin in + +Dinoponera snellingi + +and + +Dinoponera longipes + +covered with setae. Clypeus large, triangular, bulging medially; anterior tentorial pits large; frontal lobes absent; antennal sockets almost touching, located at posterior apex of clypeus. Antennae: geniculate, 13-segmented, pilosity varies from fine pubescence to long setae in different species; scape shorter than second funicular segment, but shorter than 1st, 1st funicular segment reduced. Compound eyes large, along lateral side of head, deeply emarginated medially. Three ocelli at posterior margin of head, bulging beyond margin of head in all species except + +Dinoponera australis + +. Entire head immaculate, covered in fine pubescence and long erect setae ( +Fig. 3 +). Mesosoma: pronotum triangular, exposed narrowly dorsally anterior to scutum; scutum large, bulging antero-dorsally, +with +3 longitudinal carina; small tegula over insertion of forewing; scutellum domed, side with vertical carina, dorsal surface smooth; basilar sclerite under hind wing reduced; fused mesopleuron, separated by furrow into anepisternum and katepisternum; metanotum exposed between scutellum and propodeum, reduced; dorsal face of propodeum shorter than posterior face, rounded into posterior face; coxa large, conical ( +Fig. 3 +). Wings: covered in minute pubescence, venation as shown in +Figure 5 +. Legs: one well-developed, antennae cleaning, pectinate spur on foreleg; one spine-like and one less developed denticular comb on mesothoracic tibia; one spine and one comb-like spur on hind tibia. Posterior side of fore basitarsus with dense pads of golden setae; tarsal claws bidentate. Petiole: narrow attachments at base to propodeum and gaster; petiolar node humped dorsally, subpetiolar process anteriorly triangular. Gaster: large, cylindrical, covered in fine silvery pubescence; pygidium terminating in spine posteriorly, with short cerci; hypopygidium with long fine erect setae, tabular subgenital plate with posterior end truncated, often emarginated. Genitalia ( +Figs 6 +-11 +): basal ring with dorso-anterior loop structures; parameres long, rounded, with emarginated ventro-basal edge ( +Fig. 9 +); volsella articulated with basiparamere along ventral edge, lateral finger-like cuspis volsellaris, medial digitus volsellaris with distal wide toothed cusp, basal medial lobe with tooth-like structures varying with species ( +Fig. 10 +); penis valve of aedeagus roughly triangular and rounded, aedeagal apodeme curved horn-like antero-lateral arm structure arising from mid-valve ridge, terminating at interior surface of basiparamere ( +Fig. 11 +). + + + +Figure 2. + +Dinoponera hispida + +worker. Head in full frontal view; body in lateral view. + + + + +Figure 3. + +Dinoponera longipes + +male. Head in full frontal view; body in lateral view with wings not shown. + + + + +Description of the larvae. + +A basic description of the larva of + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +(cited as + +Dinoponera grandis mutica + +) is present in +Mann (1916) +. A detailed description of the egg and all larval stages of + +Dinoponera gigantea + +are present in +Wheeler and Wheeler (1985) +. The following generic description of + +Dinoponera + +larvae is from their work: + + +" +Profile pogonomyrmecoid (i.e., diameter greatest near the middle of abdomen, decreasing gradually toward anterior end and more rapidly toward posterior end, which is rounded; thorax more slender than abdomen and forming a neck, which is curved ventrally). Body with numerous (114-160) mammiform tubercles, each with 2-25 short simple hairs; body hairs lacking elsewhere. Cranial hairs lacking. Mandible dinoponeroid (i.e. narrowly subtriangular in anterior view; anterior portion curved posteriorly; with or without medial teeth.) +" + + + +Discussion. + + +Dinoponera + +'s status as a genus is validated as several characters differentiate it from other genera. Size (TBL>2.3cm) is the most obvious character distinguishing + +Dinoponera + +. The only other ants with a worker caste approaching this size are + +Paraponera clavata + +(Fabricius)and the larger + +Pachycondyla + +such as + +Pachycondyla crassinoda + +( +Latreille 1802 +), + +Pachycondyla impressa + +Roger 1861 +and + +Pachycondyla villosa + +( +Fabricius 1804 +). + +Paraponera clavata + +is easily separated by its anvil shaped petiole with a spine on the ventral surface, highly sculptured body and deep antennal scrobes. + +Pachycondyla + +is regarded as the sister taxa to + +Dinoponera + +( +Kempf 1971 +, +Schmidt 2010 +). + +Dinoponera + +, in addition to their size, are distinguishable from + +Pachycondyla + +by the presence of two laterally projecting clypeal teeth ( +Fig. 1A +) and rows of spines on the pygidium and hypopygidium. Several (n=6) specimens have been observed to have a single ocelli in the pit at the termination of +the +median furrow. These anomalous specimens were previously thought to be queens ( +Borgmeier 1937 +) but as it has been shown that + +Dinoponera + +lacks queens, the presence of the ocelli is hypothesized to be the result of a + +Mermis + +Dujardin 1842 nematode parasite ( +Kempf 1971 +). + + + + + +Dinoponera + +biology. + + + +Dinoponera + +is one of the roughly 10 ponerine genera in which some species have secondarily lost the typical morphologically specialized queen caste for a reproductive worker known as a gamergate ( +Haskins and Zahl 1971 +, +Araujo et al. 1990 +, + +Paiva and +Brandao +1995 + +, +Monnin and Peeters 1998 +, +Peixoto et al. 2008 +). Conflict over dominance is intense in colonies with younger workers usually joining a linear hierarchy of one to five workers depending on colony size. The gamergate, or alpha female has the highest ranking ( +Monnin and Ratnieks 1999 +, +Monnin et al. 2003 +). The alpha female mates with non-nestmate males at night at the entrance of the nest ( +Monnin and Peeters 1998 +, +Monnin and Peeters 1999 +). After copulation the female bites through the +male's +gaster to release herself and pulls out the genital capsule which acts as a temporary sperm plug ( +Monnin and Peeters 1998 +). After mating the female is unreceptive to other males and remains monandrous ( +Monnin and Peeters 1998 +). The gamergate maintains dominance with ritualized behaviors such as antennal boxing and biting, +'blocking' +, as well as gaster rubbing and curling ( +Monnin and Peeters 1999 +). Lipid stores within + +Dinoponera australis + +females were found to be strongly related to foraging activity and reproductive status within the colony, ranging from 1-39% of an +individual's +dry mass ( +Smith et al. 2011 +). It is uncertain, however, whether nutritional differences between females is a cause or consequence of rank. Gamergate females possess a higher concentration of a cuticular hydrocarbon (9-hentriacontene, 9-C31:1) that indicates rank and is passed onto gamergate-laid egg cuticles ( +Monnin and Peeters 1997 +, +Monnin et al. 1998 +, +Peeters et al. 1999 +). Additionally, alpha females may 'sting +smear' +a competing female with secretions from the +Dufour's +gland, triggering the lower ranking workers to immobilize the marked female ( +Monnin and Ratnieks 2001 +). Subordinate females (beta, gamma, or delta) may produce unfertilized eggs but these are usually consumed by the alpha female in a form of "queen policing" ( +Monnin and Peeters 1997 +). Egg recognition in + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +was found to be due to differences in cuticular hydrocarbons, and only workers engaged in brood care could distinguish non-nestmate eggs ( +Tannure-Nascimento et al. 2009 +). Cuticular hydrocarbons are also used to distinguish adult nestmates from non-nestmates, however, this is only effective with non-nestmate foragers ( +Nascimento et al. 2012 +). +Nascimento et al. (2012) +found that brood-caring workers from different colonies had very similar hydrocarbon profiles and were more often accepted into alien colonies. + + +Males are born throughout most of the year in tropical species ( +Araujo and Jaisson 1994 +, +Monnin and Peeters 1998 +), however + +Dinoponera australis + +which lives in the more temperate south was found to only produce males in May-July ( + +Paiva and +Brandao +1995 + +). When the alpha declines reproductively or dies, she is replaced by a high-ranking worker ( +Monnin and Peeters 1999 +). + + +New colonies are founded by fission, a process in which a beta female is fertilized in the natal nest ( +Monnin and Peeters 1998 +). This new alpha female then leaves the +nest +with a cohort of workers to found an incipient colony, sometimes employing tandem running ( +Overal 1980 +). + + +Colonies vary in size depending upon species. + +Dinoponera australis + +colonies have an average of 14 workers (range 3-37) ( + +Paiva and +Brandao +1995 + +, +Monnin et al. 2003 +), + +Dinoponera gigantea + +average 41 workers (range~30-96) ( +Overal 1980 +, + +Fourcassie +and Oliviera 2002 + +, +Monnin et al. 2003 +) and + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +has the largest colonies with an average of 80 workers (range 26-238) ( +Monnin and Peeters 1999 +, +Monnin and Ratnieks 2001 +). +Morgan (1993) +excavated two + +Dinoponera longipes + +nests, a possible incipient colony with 7 workers and another mature colony of 120 workers. + + +The nest consists of large chambers and tunnels in the soil possibly with an earthen mound and can be 0.10-1.2m deep ( +Araujo et al. 1990 +, +Morgan 1993 +, + +Fourcassie +and Oliviera 2002 + +, +Vasconcellos et al. 2004 +). Nests are deeper in + +Dinoponera australis + +and + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +than in + +Dinoponera gigantea + +, +Monnin et al. (2003) +suggests that deeper nests are a possible adaptation to seasons and aridity. + +Dinoponera gigantea + +nests may have up to eight entrances and can be weakly polydomous ( + +Fourcassie +and Oliviera 2002 + +), whereas 1-30 openings with an average of 11 were recorded for + +Dinoponera longipes + +( +Morgan 1993 +). Nesting density and spatial distribution varies depending on habitat ( +Fowler 1985 +, +Vasconcellos et al. 2004 +). Density ranges from 15-40 nests per ha-1 ( +Vasconcellos et al. 2004 +) to 80 nests per ha-1 ( + +Paiva and +Brandao +1995 + +). +Morgan (1993) +measured a spacing between nests for + +Dinoponera longipes + +with a median of 35m (n=22, range 14-69.5m). + +Dinoponera australis + +and + +Dinoponera gigantea + +usually nest at the base of trees ( + +Paiva and +Brandao +1995 + +, + +Fourcassie +and Oliviera 2002 + +). Observations of + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +nests show that in more arid Caatinga and Cerrado habitats, nests are predominantly constructed under trees, whereas in Atlantic forest 60% of nests were 3m away from any tree ( +Vasconcellos et al. 2004 +). + + +Workers lower in the hierarchy forage individually for food items on the substrate and do not recruit other nestmates to assist with food transport ( +Fowler 1985 +, + +Fourcassie +et al. 1999 + +, + +Fourcassie +and Oliviera 2002 + +, + +Araujo +and Rodrigues 2006 + +). Although foraging workers do not recruit nestmates, +Nascimento et al. (2012) +found a positive feedback between incoming food and stimulation of new foragers as well as task partitioning once food was brought into the nest. Lower ranking females processed protein resources while higher ranking females handled small food pieces and distributed them to the larvae. + +Fourcassie +and Oliviera (2002) + +found + +Dinoponera gigantea + +foraging to be concentrated in the early morning and afternoon but did not sample at night. +Morgan (1993) +observed the highest activity at night in + +Dinoponera longipes + +. + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +has a marked seasonal pattern in activity. It is most active in May-August, the late rainy season to early dry season in the semiarid Caatinga ( +Medeiros et al. 2012 +). Activity was strongly negatively correlated to temperature and positively correlated to prey abundance ( +Medeiros et al. 2012 +). The diets of both + +Dinoponera gigantea + +and + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +have been shown to be predominantly scavenged invertebrates, but include live prey, seeds and fruits ( +Zahl 1959 +, + +Fourcassie +and Oliviera 2002 + +, + +Araujo +and Rodrigues 2006 + +). + +Araujo +and Rodrigues (2006) + +state that the taxonomic diversity of prey is comparable to other tropical ponerines, but has an optimal prey size of 2-3 +cm +in + +Dinoponera + +. Diet seems to be very similar across the genus, regardless of habitat ( + +Araujo +and Rodrigues 2006 + +). + + +Despite their large size and strong venom, + +Dinoponera + +are likely preyed on by many vertebrate and invertebrate species across South America. Like many other ant species, + +Dinoponera + +can be infected by the entomopathogenic fungi + +Codyceps + +sp. ( +Evans 1982 +). +Buys et al. (2010) +discovered a + +Kapala + +sp. eucharitid wasp emerging from the puparia of + +Dinoponera lucida + +. + + +Anatomy has been described several times. +Marques-Silva et al. (2006) +studied of the sensilla and glands of the antennae. Anatomy of the venom apparatus and mandibular glands of + +Dinoponera gigantea + +is presented in +Hermann et al. (1984) +. Further studies of the mandibular glands and its contents were presented by +Oldham and Morgan (1993) +and +Oldham et al. (1994) +. +Oldham et al. (1994) +found that the mandibular gland secretions of workers differed greatly from those of gamergates, which were 98% dimethylalkylpyrazine and lacked the four other pyrazines and 50 times more volatiles than those found in worker secretions. The post-pharyngeal gland morphology was examined by +Schoeters and Billen (1997) +. The cuticular hydrocarbons used in nestmate recognition may be produced by epidermal glands which + +Serrao +et al. (2009) + +found in the epidermis of abdominal sternites in + +Dinoponera lucida + +. + + +For subduing large live prey and defense ( +Morgan 1993 +), workers possess a sting that has been known to cause severe pain lasting up to 48 hours, lymphaedenopathy, edema, tachycardia and fresh blood to appear in human victim feces are common symptoms ( +Haddad et al. 2005 +). In gamergates the venom sac is empty ( +Monnin et al. 2002 +). Workers may have 60-75 unique proteinaceous components in the venom ( +Morgan et al. 2003 +, +Johnson et al. 2010 +). The convoluted gland within the venom system of + +Dinoponera australis + +has been found to possess close similarities to those of vespine wasps ( +Schoeters and Billen 1995 +). The contents of + +Dinoponera australis + +venom have been found to be similar to those of + +Pachycondyla + +spp. ( + +Cruz +Lopez +1994 + +, +Johnson et al. 2010 +). +Billen et al. (1995) +studied the morphology and ultrastructure of the pygidial gland of + +Dinoponera australis + +. Due to the high diversity of compounds and systemic effects found by +Haddad et al. (2005) +, venom of + +Dinoponera + +could be of use to the pharmaceutical industry. For instance, +Sousa et al. (2012) +demonstrated in mice that venom from + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +had antinociceptive properties. The authors note that the local population of northeast Brazil uses dry crushed + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +ants to treat earaches, and the stings of live ants are administered for back pain and rheumatism. + + +Several studies of the cytogenetics of + +Dinoponera + +species have been conducted. + +Dinoponera lucida + +may have the highest number of chromosomes within the +Hymenoptera +however the karyotype is variable between populations (2n=106-120) ( +Mariano et al. 2004 +, +Mariano et al. 2008 +, +Barros et al. 2009 +). +Mariano et al. (2008) +interpreted the karyotype differences between populations as being due to a division of the species into allopatric populations during the Quaternary. Variability in the karyotype within a described species has been found in the + +Pachycondyla + +as well, and may represent cryp +tic +species ( +Mariano et al. 2012 +). Descriptions of the banding patterns on + +Dinoponera + +chromosomes are provided by +Barros et al. (2009) +and +de Aguiar et al. (2011) +. + + + +Dinoponera + +belongs to the tribe +Ponerini +in the subfamily +Ponerinae +. The evolutionary position of the genus within +Ponerinae +was resolved by +Schmidt (2010) +. Based on the phylogenetic analysis of +Schmidt (2010) +and karyotype analysis by +Mariano et al. (2012) +, + +Dinoponera + +'s closest living relatives are in the + +Pachycondyla + +species group consisting of + +Pachycondyla crassinoda + +, + +Pachycondyla harpax + +( +Fabricius 1804 +), + +Pachycondyla impressa + +, + +Pachycondyla metanotalis + +Luederwaldt 1918 +, and + +Pachycondyla striata + +Smith 1858 +. Prior to the generation of well supported phylogenies other associations had been proposed. +Carpenter (1930) +suggested that the fossil + +Archiponera wheeleri + +Carpenter from the Miocene Florissant shale of Colorado may be an ancestor of + +Dinoponera + +and + +Streblognathus aethiopicus + +Smith 1858 +. Molecular data has shown that +Carpenter's +(1930) hypothesis is false ( +Schmidt 2010 +). + +Streblognathus + +is not closely related to + +Dinoponera + +, and its morphological similarity is purely convergence. The placement of + +Archiponera wheeleri + +is still questionable. + + + + +Key to the workers of + +Dinoponera + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1Antero-inferior corner of pronotum with distinct tooth-like process (Fig. 1D)2
-Antero-inferior corner of pronotum without tooth-like process (Fig. 1E)4
2Head (Fig. 12B), sides of petiole and terga 1 and 2 of gaster smooth and polished, integument with bluish luster (Fig. 12A); southeastern coast of Brazil +Dinoponera lucida +Emery +
-Head, lateral sides of the petiole and terga 1 and 2 of gaster finely micro-punctate/scaled (Fig. 12B)3
3Total body length under 3 cm; Bolivia, Paraguay, northern Argentina and southern Brazil + +Dinoponera australis + +Emery +
-Total body length over 3 cm; Brazil, Peru, and Guyana + +Dinoponera gigantea + +(Perty) +
4 +Body covered in bristle-like setae which are not flagellate (Fig. 1C); +Para +, Brazil + + +Dinoponera hispida + +sp. n. +
-Body covered in fine and flagellate setae (Fig. 1B)5
5 +Appressed golden yellow pubescence present on frons (Fig. 1A); Colombia south to +Peru +to northern Brazil + + +Dinoponera longipes + +Emery +
-Pubescence absent from frons or not golden yellow6
6Sides of head, lateral sides of the petiole and terga 1 and 2 of gaster finely micro-punctate/scaled (Fig. 12B); in profile antero-dorsal edge of petiole bulging (Fig. 1G); northeast Brazil + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +Santschi +
-Sides of head, sides of the petiole and terga 1 and 2 of gaster smooth, shiny and polished with no microsculpturing, integument with bluish luster (Fig. 12A); in profile petiole with even dorsal corners (Fig. 1F); eastern Bolivia, northern Paraguay and southwestern Brazil + +Dinoponera mutica + +Emery +
+ + + + +Key to the known males of + +Dinoponera + + + +(couplets 1 and 2 are included to easily separate males of other genera which are likely confused with + +Dinoponera + +) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1Total body length less than 15 mm + +Pachycondyla + +and other poneroids +
-Total body length greater than 15 mm2
2Subpetiolar process in form of spine; pronotum heavily sculptured; palp formula 5:3 + +Paraponera + +
-Subpetiolar process without spine; pronotum shiny, microsculptured; palp formula 4:33
3Ocelli protruding on occipital margin of head (Fig. 4A-D)4
-Ocelli not protruding on occipital margin of head (Fig. 4E); Bolivia, Paraguay, northern Argentina and southern Brazil + +Dinoponera australis + +Emery +
4Setae on funiculus long and erect (Fig. 4F, G)5
-Setae on funiculus short, stiff and subdecumbent, or minute pubescence present (Fig. 4H, I, J)6
5Digitus volsellaris with toothless lobe at distal end (Fig. 10C); Brazil, Peru, and Guyana + +Dinoponera gigantea + +(Perty) +
-Digitus volsellaris without lobe at distal end (Fig. 10A); northeast Brazil + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +Santschi +
6 +Pygidium terminating in narrow, elongate spine (Fig. 4M); penis valve of aedeagus wedge-shaped in lateral view (Fig. 11E); Colombia south to +Peru +to north western Brazil + + +Dinoponera longipes + +Emery +
-Pygidium terminating in short, broad, triangular angle (Fig. 4N); penis valve of aedeagus with distal flange and triangular ventral lobe (Fig. 11B); Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil + +Dinoponera snellingi + +sp. n. +
+ + + + +Clave para la +identificacion +de las obreras de + +Dinoponera + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1Esquina antero-inferior del pronoto con proceso en forma de diente distinto (Fig. 1D)2
-Esquina antero-inferior del pronoto sin proceso en forma de diente (Fig. 1E)4
2 +Cabeza, lados laterales del +peciolo +, y tergos 1 y 2 del +gaster +lisos y brillantes, con reflexiones azules (Fig. 12A) + + +Dinoponera lucida + +Emery +
- +Cabeza, lados laterales del +peciolo +, y las tergos 1 y 2 del +gaster +finamente punteados o con escamas finas (Fig. 12B), a veces con reflexiones azules +3
3Largo total menos de 3 cms + +Dinoponera australis + +Emery +
- +Largo total +mas +de 3cms + + +Dinoponera gigantea + +(Perty) +
4Cuerpo cubierto con pelos gruesos, no flagelados (Fig. 1C) + +Dinoponera hispida + +sp. n. +
+- +Cuerpo cubierto con pelos finos y flagelados (Fig. 1B)5
5Frente con pubescencia recostada y amarillo-dorada (Fig. 1A) + +Dinoponera longipes + +Emery +
-Frente sin pubescencia recostada y amarilla6
6 +Lados de la cabeza, lados del +peciolo +y tergos 1 y 2 del +gaster +finamente punteados o con escamas finas (Fig. 12B); +peciolo +(en perfil) con el borde anterior-dorsal hinchado (Fig. 1G) + + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +Santschi +
- +Lados de la cabeza, lados del +peciolo +y tergos 1 y 2 del +gaster +lisos, y brillantes, sin escultura fina, con reflexiones azules (Fig. 12A); +peciolo +(en perfil) con esquinas dorsales al mismo nivel (Fig. 1F) + + +Dinoponera mutica + +Emery +
+ + + + +Clave para la +identificacion +de los machos conocidos de + +Dinoponera + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1Largo total menos de 15 mm + +Pachycondyla + +y otros poneroides +
- +Largo total +mas +de 15 mm +2
2Proceso subpetiolar en forma de espina; pronoto fuertemente esculturado; formula palpal 5:3 + +Paraponera + +
-Proceso subpetiolar no en forma de espina; pronoto liso, microesculturado; formula palpal 4:33
3Ocelos muy hinchados en el margen occipital de la cabeza (Fig. 4A-D)4
-Ocelos no muy hinchados en el margen occipital de la cabeza (Fig. 4E) + +Dinoponera australis + +Emery +
4 +Funiculo +con pelos alargados y rectos (Fig. 4F, G) +5
- +Funiculo +con pelos cortos, +rigidos +, y subdecumbentes, o con pubescencia diminuta (Fig. 4H, I, J) +6
5 +Lobulo +del digito del volsela sin dientes en el +apice +(Fig. 10C) + + +Dinoponera gigantea + +(Perty) +
- +Digito del volsela sin +lobulo +en el +apice +(Fig. 10A) + + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +Santschi +
6 +Pigidio terminando en un espina, alargada y delgada (Fig. 4M); +valvula +peneal del aedeago en forma de +cuna +(Visto en perfil) (Fig. 11E) + + +Dinoponera longipes + +Emery +
- +Pigidio terminando en una espina corta y ancha, en forma de +triangulo +(Fig. 4N); +valvula +peneal del aedeago con una reborde distal y un +lobulo +triangular ventral (Fig. 11B) + + +Dinoponera snellingi + +sp. n. +
+ + + + +Chave para +identificacao +de +operarios +de + +Dinoponera + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1Esquina antero-inferior do pronoto com processo em forma de dente distinto (Fig. 1D)2
-Esquina antero-inferior do pronoto sem processo em forma de dente (Fig. 1E)4
+2 + +Cabeca +, lados laterais do +peciolo +, e tergas 1 e 2 do +gaster +lisos e brilhantes, com +reflexoes +azuis (Fig. 12A) + + +Dinoponera lucida + +Emery +
- +Cabeza, lados laterais do +peciolo +, e tergas 1 e 2 do +gaster +finamente ponteado ou com escamas finas (Fig. 12B) +3
3Comprido total menos 3 cms + +Dinoponera australis + +Emery +
-Comprido total mais de 3 cms + +Dinoponera gigantea + +(Perty) +
4 +Corpo cobrido com cogumelos em forma de cerdas, que +nao +sao +flagelados (Fig. 1C) + + +Dinoponera hispida + +sp. n. +
-Corpo cobrido com cogumelos finos e flagelados (Fig. 1B)5
5Frons com pubescencia prendida e amarela-dourada (Fig. 1A) + +Dinoponera longipes + +Emery +
-Frons sem pubescencia amarelo prendido6
6 +Lados da +cabeca +, lados do +peciolo +e tergas 1 e 2 do +gaster +finamente ponteados ou com escamas finas (Fig. 12B); +peciolo +(em perfil) com o margem anterior-dorsal hinchado (Fig. 1G) + + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +Santschi +
- +Lados da +cabeca +, lados do +peciolo +e tergas 1 e 2 do +gaster +lisos e brilhantes, sem escultura fina, com +reflexoes +azuis (Fig. 12A); +peciolo +(em perfil) com esquinas dorsais ao mesmo +nivel +(Fig. 1F) + + +Dinoponera mutica + +Emery +
+ + + + +Chave para +identificacao +de machos de + +Dinoponera + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1Comprido total menos de 15mm + +Pachycondyla + +e outro poneromorfos +
-Comprido total mais de 15 mm2
2Proceso subpetiolar em forma de espinha; pronoto fortemente esculturado; formula palpular 5:3 + +Paraponera + +
- +Processo subpetiolar +nao +em forma de espinha; pronoto liso, microesculturado; formula para palpular 4:3 +3
3 +Ocelos na margem occipital da +cabeca +muito inchados (Fig. 4A-D) +4
- +Ocelos na margem occipital da +cabeca +nao +muito inchados (Fig. 4E) + + +Dinoponera australis + +Emery +
4 +Funiculo +com cogumelos alongados e retos (Fig. 4F, G) +5
- +Funiculo +com cogumelos curtos, +rigidos +, e subdecumbentes, ou com pubescencia minuta (Fig. 4H, I, J) +6
5 +Lobulo +do +digito +do volsela sem dentes no +apice +(Fig. 10C) + + +Dinoponera gigantea + +(Perty) +
- +Digito +do volsela sem +lobulo +no +apice +(Fig. 10A) + + +Dinoponera quadriceps + +Santschi +
6 +Pigidio acabado numa espinha, alongada e delgada (Fig. 4M); +valvula +penal do aedeago em forma de cunha (visto em perfil) (Fig. 11 E) + + +Dinoponera longipes + +Emery +
- +Pigidio acabado numa espinha apara e alarga, em forma de +triangulo +(Fig. 4N); +valvula +penal do aedeago com um reborde distal e um +lobulo +triangular ventral (Fig. 11B) + + +Dinoponera snellingi + +sp. n. +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC400647FF4C2A90B028FB48.xml b/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC400647FF4C2A90B028FB48.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..189e4437bea --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC400647FF4C2A90B028FB48.xml @@ -0,0 +1,660 @@ + + + +Paratanaoidean tanaidaceans (Crustacea: Peracarida) from littoral and shallow sublittoral habitats in New Zealand, with descriptions of three new genera and seven new species + + + +Author + +BIRD, GRAHAM J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2011-05-25 + + +2891 + + +1 + + +1 +62 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2891.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.2891.1.1 +1175­5334 +10095598 +1DF47466-0448-4EE7-8D7C-456BA1D0E152 + + + + + + + +Paratanais tara + +n. sp. + + + + + + +Figs 12–17 + + + + +Material examined. + +All +from north or west coasts of +North Island +, +New Zealand +. + +Holotype +: + +neuter/non-ovigerous female, 3.0 mm, GJB/2-05 lower eulittoral, algal turf and other encrusting biota, +New Plymouth Aquatic Centre +, + +20/8/2005 + +, [CR.21772]. + +Allotype + +: swimming male, +2.2 mm +, GJB/7-10, LWN rock with piddock borings, +Maukutea Beach +, +Aotea Harbour +, + +8/4/2010 + +, [CR.21773]. + +Paratypes +: + +two manca-II, one manca-III, four neuters [one partly dissected on microslide CR.21777], GJB/1-05, [CR.21776]; two manca-II, seven neuters, one ov. female, +one male +[partly dissected on microslide CR.21775], GJB/7-10, [CR21774]; one manca-II, seven neuters [one partially dissected] GJB/2-05, [ +NIWA +: 70535]. +Other material: +three neuters, GJB/2-10; one neuter, GJB/4-10; one manca-II, GJB/5-10; one neuter, +NZOI +BS-241 +, [CR.21806]; one neuter, +NZOI +BS-794 +, [CR.21807] + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Female +: + +Paratanais + +with +pleon +as long as pereonites 5–6; plumose setae on pleonites 1–4 only. +Antenna +article-2 with inferior thorn-like apophysis. +Mandible lacinia mobilis +with crenulated distal margin. +Maxilliped +palp article-2 with only one unspecialised pinnate seta (i.e. similar to those on articles 3–4); endite with strong medial seta. +Cheliped +propodus with seta near articulation with dactylus; dactylus with two inferior spines. +Pereopod-1 +merus 2.5 times ltb. +Pereopods 4–6 +carpal spines well-developed. +Uropod +as long as pleotelson, exopod 1-segmented. + + +Male +: +Habitus +paratanaid swimming form. +Cephalothorax +shorter than pereonites 1–3. +Pereonites +4-6 longer than pereonites 1-3 and pleonites. +Antennule +peduncle 3-articled, article-1 twice as long as broad; flagellum 5-segmented, with terminal segment cap-like. +Antenna +article-2 similar to female. +Cheliped +fixed finger incisive margin smooth but uneven; dactylus with two digitiform spines. +Uropod +endopod 3-segmented, slender. + + + + +Etymology. +From Te reo Māori noun + +tara + +, ‘a thorn’, alluding to the inferior spine on antenna article-2. + + + + + + +Type +locality. + +Lower +eulittoral rocky-shore adjacent to +Aquatic Centre +, +New Plymouth +, +North Island +, +New Zealand +; specifically, +ca +. +39° 03´16´´S +174° 03´47´´E +(sourced from Google Earth) + +. + + + + +Description. +Neuter +: +Habitus +( +Figs 12A +, +15H +) typical paratanaid, unpigmented, cuticle pale and shiny; slen- der, up to 7.5 times ltb, length +1.47–3.65 mm +. +Cephalothorax +pear-shaped, 1.3 times ltb, almost as long as pereonites 1–2 combined; lateral margin with small setae posterior to eyes and at mid-length. +Pereon +57% of body length, pereonite-1 shortest, pereonites 2–5 of similar length, with almost straight lateral margins; all pereonites shorter than broad, 0.43, 0.78, 0.77, 0.79, 0.82 and 0.68 times as long as broad respectively; pereonite-1 with four distolateral and distomedial setae, pereonites 2–6 with two distolateral setae. +Pleon +( +Fig. 12B +) as long as pereonites 5 and 6, 18% of body length, 1.5 times ltb; pleonite-5 slightly longer than rest; pleonites 1–4 with one large circumplumose seta on epimeral margin, pleonites 1–3 also with a simple seta. +Pleotelson +( +Fig. 12C +) as long as pleonites 4–5, about half as long as broad, with two posteriolateral setae, weakly rounded posterior margin (dorsal view) with four simple setae and two PSS, and with small deflexed apex bearing two setae ( +Fig. 12D +). + + +Antennule +( +Fig. 12F +) 0.8 times as long as cephalothorax; article-1 about 50% of total length, twice as long as broad, lateral margin with proximal and distal groups of PSS and one distal simple seta, mesial margin with small distal seta; article-2 just shorter than broad, with long lateral seta and three PSS, with small inferior seta; article-3 0.75 times as long as article-2, as long as broad, with one mesial and one lateral distal setae; article-4 just shorter than articles 2–3 together, with distal seta; article-5 tiny, cap-like, with five setae and one aesthetasc. +Antenna +( +Figs 12G +, +15J, L–M +) 0.7 times as long as antennule, stout; article-1 simple, short and naked; article-2 large, as long as broad, distally expanded, with setulose superior margin, one superior distal seta and ventrally directed thorn-like inferodistal spine; article-3 half length of article-2, shorter than broad, with strong superior distal spine; article-4 just longer than article-2, 2.3 times ltb, with medial seta, one distal simple and two PSS; article-5 less than half as long as article-4, twice as long as broad, with one distal seta; article-6 short, cap-like, with six long terminal setae and one PSS. + + +Labrum +( +Fig. 13A +) cap-shaped, apically setose. +Labium +( +Fig. 13B +) lobes rounded, distally setose. +Mandible +( +Figs 13C–D +) left incisor with crenulated distal margin, inner process largest, +lacinia mobilis +very broad, with about six processes; right incisor with crenulated distal margin and weakly bifid tip; molar process as large as incisor, of grinding +type +, with numerous ridges and granular crushing surface. +Maxillule +( +Fig. 13E +) endite with distal groups of setae and at least eight terminal spines. +Maxilla +( +Fig. 13F +) subovate, as large as maxilliped palp article-2. tooth-like distal spines and inner seta; palp article-1 naked, article-2 with lateral seta, two simple and one finely pectinate mesial setae; article-3 curved, with one smooth and three pinnate mesial setae; article-4 shorter than article-3, with one distal simple and five terminal pinnate setae. +Epignath +not recovered. dibles respectively; E maxillule endite; F maxilla; G maxilliped (setation of distal palp articles omitted for clarity); H maxilliped endites, distal; J maxilliped palp articles 3 and 4; K right cheliped; L fixed finger distal; M left chela (mesial view). Scale bar: +0.25 mm +. + + + +FIGURE 12. + +Paratanais tara + + +n. sp. + +Holotype female: A habitus (pereonite-1 slightly damaged); B pleonite epimera plumose + + + + +FIGURE 13. + +Paratanais tara + + +n. sp. + +Paratype preparatory female: A labrum (lateral view); B labium; C–D left and right man- + + + + +FIGURE 14. + +Paratanais tara + + +n. sp. + +Paratype preparatory female: A–C pereopods 1–3 respectively, with inner carpal spines of pereopods 2–3; D pereopod-4; E pereopod-4 carpus lateral setation; F–G pereopods 5–6 respectively; H pereopod-6 distal (lateral view). Scale bar 0.25 mm. + + + + +FIGURE 15. + +Paratanais tara + + +n. sp. + +Paratype preparatory female: A pleopod; paratype manca-II: B habitus; C antenna articles + + + +2–3; D uropod; +paratype +manca-III: E habitus; F antenna article-2 inferior spine; G uropod; +paratype +small neuter: H habitus; J antenna articles 2–3; K uropod; Aotea Harbour neuters: L–M antenna article-2 inferior spine variation. Scale bars: (i) +0.125 mm +for A; (ii) +0.5 mm +for B, E and H, +0.125 mm +for C, D, F–L. + + + +FIGURE 17. + +Paratanais tara + + +n. sp. + +Allotype swimming male: A cheliped; B pereopod-1; C pereopod-2; D pereopod-5; E pereopod-6 distal (lateral view). Scale bar: 0.125 mm. + + + +Cheliped +( +Figs 12H +, +13K–M +) coxal sclerite with acuminate posterior extending to cephalothorax margin; basis 1.4 times ltb, with posterior free process smaller than anterior part, latter with lateral seta; merus subtriangular, inferior margin much longer than that of carpus, with one long seta; carpus subovate, longer than basis, 1.7 times ltb, with two unequal inferior setae and two smaller superior setae; propodus as long as but narrower than carpus, 2.3 times ltb, palm slightly narrower distally, almost 3.5 times longer than fixed finger, with seta near dactylus articulation and with mesial comb of three pectinate spines; fixed finger with raised crushing incisive margin, two inferior setae and three setae near incisive margin, terminal spine conical; dactylus basally as wide as fixed finger, with strong mesial seta and two spines on incisive margin. + + +Pereopod-1 +( +Fig. 14A +) coxa with seta; basis curved, slightly narrower than pereopods 2–3, 4.4 times ltb, with proximal seta on slight process; ischium with one seta; merus 2.5 times ltb, with strongly oblique articulation with carpus, naked; carpus two-thirds as long as merus, twice as long as broad, with two unequal superior distal setae, and small mesial and inferodistal setae; propodus narrow, about 1.7 times longer than carpus, 5.5 times ltb, with strong superior distal seta and long inferodistal seta, apex setulated; dactylus shorter than unguis, with proximal seta, together as long as propodus. +Pereopod-2 +( +Fig. 14B +) stouter than pereopod-1; coxa with long seta; basis 3.25 times ltb (greatest width), with proximal seta; ischium with one seta; merus distally wider, with oblique articulation with carpus, 1.25 times ltb, with inferodistal spine (lateral) and seta (mesial); carpus subrectangular, as long as merus, with one strong superior distal spine (lateral) and small seta (mesial), and two inferodistal spines; propodus about as long as merus and carpus combined, narrower, with one superior distal seta and one longer inferodistal seta, apex setulated; dactylus shorter than unguis, together as long as propodus. +Pereopod-3 +( +Fig. 14C +) similar to pereopod-2, but basis slightly shorter; dactylus and unguis just shorter than propodus. + + +Pereopod-4 +( +Figs 14D–E +) basis robust, larger than pereopods 1–3, 2.7 times ltb, with proximal seta; ischium with two unequal setae; merus with oblique articulation with carpus, with two strong inferodistal spines; carpus subrectangular, as long as merus, twice as long as broad, inferodistal margin with row of microtrichia, distal margin with four stout bifid (or complex) spines and stiff superior seta (mesial); propodus as long as carpus, superior margin with a PSS, superior distal margin with spine as long as dactylus, and two shorter inferodistal spines, apex setulated; dactylus and unguis claw-like, shorter than propodus. +Pereopod-5 +( +Fig. 14F +) similar to pereopod-4 but basis midlength with two inferior pinnate setae. +Pereopod-6 +( +Figs 14G–H +) similar to pereopods 4–5 but propodus without a PSS, with three pectinate superior distal spines. + + +Pleopod +( +Fig. 15A +) peduncle longer than broad, naked; endopod subovate, twice as long as broad, with setulated mesial margin, with one mesial distal plumose seta, lateral margin with 15 plumose setae, with slight gap between most proximal seta and rest; exopod slightly longer and more slender than endopod, with +ca +. 23 plumose setae on lateral margin, with slight gap between most proximal seta and rest. + + +Uropod +( +Figs 12E +, +15K +) just longer than pleotelson; peduncle as long as broad; exopod 1-segmented, slender, seven times ltb, reaching beyond segment-1 of endopod, with two long, unequally thick, terminal setae; endopod 2- segmented, 5.5 times ltb, segment-1 0.6 times total length, with one simple and two distal PSS; article-2 apex with four long, one short simple, and three PSS. + + +Manca-II +: +Habitus +( +Fig. 15B +) generally similar to neuter but body fairly slender, 5.8 times ltb; length +1.04– 1.23 mm +. +Cephalothorax +proportionately longer. +Pereonites +2–4 shorter. +Pleonites +1–5 without epimeral plumose seta. +Antenna +( +Fig. 15C +) article-2 without inferior spine. +Uropod +( +Fig. 15D +) stouter. + + +Manca-III: Habitus +( +Fig. 15E +) similar to manca-II but more slender, seven times ltb; length +1.34 mm +. +Cephalothorax +proportionately shorter. +Pereonites +2–5 longer. +Antenna +( +Fig. 15F +) article-2 with inferior spine. +Uropod +more slender than manca-II ( +Fig. 15G +). + + +Ovigerous female: +similar to neuter but with oostegites; length +3.84 mm +. + + +Male: Habitus +(Fig. 16A): typical of genus, fairly stout, 5.4 times ltb, length +1.97–2.2 mm +. +Cephalothorax +(Fig. 16B) flask-shaped, as long as pereonites 1–3, rostrum spatulate; eyes 0.3 times as long as cephalothorax. +Pereon +46 % of body length, all pereonites less than half as long as broad, but pereonites 4–6 clearly longer than pereonites 1–3. +Pleon +24% of body length, just shorter than pereonites 4–6, pleonites shorter than pereonites 2–6. +Pleotelson: +twice as wide as long, setation as in female. + + +Antennule +(Fig. 16C) as long as cephalothorax, with 3-articled peduncle and 5-segmented flagellum; peduncle article-1 about 50% of total length; article-2 with three PSS; article-3 with superior and inferior seta; flagellar segments 1–3 with inferior bundle of aesthetascs ( +ca +. eight, six and four, respectively), segment-4 with distal seta, segment-5 short with several setae and aesthetasc. +Antenna +(Fig. 16D) similar to female but article-3 less expanded, with superior stiff seta, article-4 more slender, with about three PSS and long distal seta; article-5 more slender. + + +Mouthparts +: reduced (maxilliped present), typical of genus. + + +Cheliped +(Figs 16E, 17A) similar to female but carpus stouter, 1.5 times ltb; propodus palm stouter, 0.67 times length of chela, with mesial comb of ten spines; dactylus stronger mesial seta, and with one seta and two digitiform spines on incisive margin. + + +Pereopod-1 +( +Figs 17B +) similar to female but carpus superior distal seta shorter; propodus superior distal seta weaker; dactylus and unguis shorter, 0.5 times as long as propodus. +Pereopod-2 +( +Fig. 17C +) similar to female but + + +Pereopod-4 +similar to pereopod-5. +Pereopod-5 +( +Fig. 17D +) similar to female but basis more slender, with two superior PSS; carpal spines smaller; propodus more slender, as long as carpus and merus together, with a smaller superior PSS, smaller and weaker superior and inferior distal spines; dactylus and unguis longer. +Pereopod-6 +( +Fig. 17E +) similar to pereopod-5 but propodus without a superior PSS, and with three superior distal pectinate spines. + + +Pleopod +similar to female but exopod and endopod setae proportionately longer. + + +Uropod +(Fig. 16F) just longer than pleotelson; peduncle as long as broad, naked; exopod 2-segmented, slender, reaching half of endopod segment-3, segment-1 with seta, segment-2 with unequal terminal setae; endopod 3-segmented, segment-1 shorter than broad, with a PSS, segment-2 twice as long as segment-1, with simple setae and two PSS, segment-3 as long as previous two combined, with four simple (one very long) and three PSS. + + + + +Remarks. +Among other described + +Paratanais +species + +, the prominent inferior spine on antennal article-2 is possessed only by + +P. gaspodei + +of +Western Australia +and the recently described + +P. martinsi +Bamber & Costa, 2009 + +from the Azores. Of these two, + +P.tara + +is closer to the latter in body shape (cephalothorax and pereonite proportions). It differs from + +P. gaspodei + +in antennal shape and has, among other things, rounded maxilliped endite teeth, a more slender palp article-2 distal seta, a larger cheliped fixed finger and dactylus ( +c.f. +palm), more complex pereopod setation, and a longer uropod exopod. A phylogenetic study might verify a close affinity of + +P. tara + +with these two species and suggest a separate taxonomic status from other + +Paratanais +species. + +The specimens of + +P. tara + +from Aotea Harbour have very slightly different antennal spines ( +Fig. 15L +) compared to the New Plymouth material. + + +Compared to the other +NZ + +Paratanais +species + +(see below) + +P. tara + +has a longer pereonite-2 ( +c.f +. pereonite-1) and slightly higher rate of pleon lengthening with size increase. The male is also more elongate in + +P. tara + +, with a proportionately smaller cephalothorax; in this respect it also differs from the more compact shape of the males of the Australian species + +P. maleficus + +and + +P. wanga + +. However, it belongs to the group of species with males having an antennule with three, four or five flagellar segments (e.g. +Paratanaidae +indet. ( +Sieg 1986a +), + +P. clarkae +Bird & Bamber, 2000 + +, and + +P. +maleficus + +, respectively). + + + + +Distribution and ecology. +Like + +Parakonarus kopure + +, + +Paratanais tara + +inhabits the lower littoral rocky shore but it is also found in outer estuarine sands. Sympatric tanaidaceans in rocky shore habitats include + +Apseudomorpha timaruvia + +, + +Metapseudes sp. + +, + +Cyclopoapseudes +sp. + +, and + +Zeuxoides rimuwhero + +, but with + +Araphura whakarakaia + + +n. sp. + +(see below) in muddy sand. + + + +It +is known only from the three localities on the west coast of the +North Island +, between +Taranaki and Northland +. +The +specimens from the +Northland + +BS- +241 + +and + +BS- +794 + +stations were recorded as + +P. oculatus + +by +J. Sieg + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC41067EFF4C2BF8B6F2F8CA.xml b/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC41067EFF4C2BF8B6F2F8CA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9dbb807595c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC41067EFF4C2BF8B6F2F8CA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ + + + +Paratanaoidean tanaidaceans (Crustacea: Peracarida) from littoral and shallow sublittoral habitats in New Zealand, with descriptions of three new genera and seven new species + + + +Author + +BIRD, GRAHAM J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2011-05-25 + + +2891 + + +1 + + +1 +62 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2891.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.2891.1.1 +1175­5334 +1DF47466-0448-4EE7-8D7C-456BA1D0E152 + + + + + + + +Paratanais +Dana, 1852 + + + + + + + + + +Paratanais +: Larsen (2001) + +: 358; + +Sieg (1983b) +: 478 + +–480; both for extensive bibliography and synonymy. + + + + + +Diagnosis. +see Larsen (2001). + + + + + +Type +species. + + +Paratanais elongatus +( +Dana, 1849 +) + +; see also +Bamber (1998) +. + + +Species included ( +Australasian only): + +Paratanais gaspodei +Bamber, 2005 + +; + +P. linearis +Haswell + +; + +Paratanais maleficus +Larsen, 2001 + +; + +P. malignus +Larsen, 2001 + +; + +P. oculatus +(Vanhöffen, 1914) + +?; + +P. paraoa + + +n. sp. + +; + +P. perturbatius +Larsen, 2001 + +; + +P. tara + + +n. sp. + +; + +P. vetinari +Bamber, 2005 + +; + +P. wanga +Bamber, 2008 + +. + + +Incertae sedis +within + +Paratanais + +: + +Paratanais tenuis +Thomson, 1880 + +. + + + + +Remarks. +It has scarcely been remarked that most of the species assigned to the genus do not conform to the pattern set by the +type +species + +P. elongatus + +with respect to pereonite proportions, pleonal setation, cheliped shape and pereopod setation. Large articulated plumose setae on the pleonal epimera do not feature in the diagnoses offered by +Lang (1973: 223) +or Larsen (2001: 358), were not figured on the +type +species ( +Bamber 1998 +), and they are apparently absent on seven other species. Additionally, these setae may be present on all pleonites (e.g. + +P. maleficus + +, + +malignus + +, + +gaspodei + +and + +oculatus + +) or only on pleonites 1–4 (e.g. + +P. martinsi +Bamber & Costa, 2009 + +, + +P +. +wanga + +and the two new +NZ +species described here). A recent examination of the +type +of + +P. elongatus + +confirmed that it does have plumose epimeral setae on pleonites 1-4 (Bamber pers. comm.). + + +Sieg (1986a) +stated that a revision of the genus was required and this has become more necessary with discovery of twelve more species since then—a casual view of the occurrence of particular characters in + +Paratanais + +might suggest a chaotic situation but, +if +the species truly form a monophyletic group, +then +a pattern of relationships should be discernible with more rigorous phylogenetic analyses. Ambiguities in character-scoring for phylogenetic analyses could be avoided by closer examination of the setation of pereopods and pleonites in the paratanaids, examples being the occurrence of three or four carpal spines on pereopods 4–6, as well as the distribution of plumose epimeral seta (if present). +Sieg (1986a) +also noticed two groups within the genus based on maxilliped palp setation and male antennule structure and this may prove to be valid. In addition to this complexity and the apparent anomalies, the genus also exhibits two traits that are conflicting with respect to species identification: the presence of differently-sized and shaped adult morphs (especially in females) within the same species and the sympatry of morphologically near-identical cryptic species, separable by molecular techniques (Larsen 2001). + + + +Paratanais + +is a widespread genus extending from subantarctic to tropical regions, generally in littoral, sublittoral or shallow bathyal water situations and there is a rich Australasian fauna ( +Bamber 2008 +). In contrast, in +New Zealand +there are only unconfirmed and unpublished records of + +P. oculatus + +(identifications by J. Sieg) but initial studies by me suggest that this taxon is not involved. Also, + +P. tenuis + +cannot be assigned to + +Paratanais + +as it has 4- segmented uropod endopods ( +Thomson 1880 +: plate I fig 1b) and probably belongs to a genus within the +Leptocheliidae +. +Lang (1973) +regarded material, including males, from sub-tidal Cook Strait and Cape Palliser identified by Hurley (1957) as being synonymous with + +Leptochelia mirabilis +Stebbing, 1905 + +. New material, ideally from the +Otago +Harbour +type +locality, is necessary to establish its real taxonomy. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC490676FF4C2962B7EEFBBC.xml b/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC490676FF4C2962B7EEFBBC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..325afcaec93 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC490676FF4C2962B7EEFBBC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ + + + +Paratanaoidean tanaidaceans (Crustacea: Peracarida) from littoral and shallow sublittoral habitats in New Zealand, with descriptions of three new genera and seven new species + + + +Author + +BIRD, GRAHAM J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2011-05-25 + + +2891 + + +1 + + +1 +62 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2891.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.2891.1.1 +1175­5334 +1DF47466-0448-4EE7-8D7C-456BA1D0E152 + + + + + + +Subfamily + +Paratanaidinae +Lang 1949 + + + + + + + +Remarks. +Phylogenetically, this is a more well-defined family than the +Leptocheliidae +but further work is needed to refine it ( +Bird & Larsen 2009 +) with respect to the two subfamilies + +Bathytanaidinae +Larsen & Heard, 2001 + +and +Paratanaidinae +, and the genus + +Metatanais +Shiino, 1952 + +(although see below). It is well represented in the Australasian region ( +Bamber 2008 +) and includes + +Bathytanais +Beddard + +, + +Pseudobathytanais +Kudinova-Pasternak + +, + +Paratanais +Dana, 1852 + +, and + +Xeplenois +Bamber, 2005 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC6C0650FF4C2913B78BF803.xml b/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC6C0650FF4C2913B78BF803.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f0247bfc720 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC6C0650FF4C2913B78BF803.xml @@ -0,0 +1,359 @@ + + + +Paratanaoidean tanaidaceans (Crustacea: Peracarida) from littoral and shallow sublittoral habitats in New Zealand, with descriptions of three new genera and seven new species + + + +Author + +BIRD, GRAHAM J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2011-05-25 + + +2891 + + +1 + + +1 +62 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2891.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.2891.1.1 +1175­5334 +10095598 +1DF47466-0448-4EE7-8D7C-456BA1D0E152 + + + + + + + +Tanaopsis rawhitia + +n. sp. + + + + + + +Figs 31–34 + + + + +Material examined. + +Holotype + +: neuter/non-ovigerous female, +2.22 mm +GJB/1-09, [CR.21785]. + +Allotype + +: swimming male, +1.42 mm +GJB/2-09, [CR.21786]. + +Paratypes + +: four manca-III, seven neuters [one partly dissected on microslide: CR.21788], +one male +, GJB/2-09, [CR.2187]. +Other material +: one neuter, GJB/5-08. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Female: Habitus: +Tanaopsis + +with pereonites 4–5 as long as broad; pereonite-6 more than half as long as pereonite-5. +Mandibles +with acuminate molar. +Maxilliped +basis seta longer than endite. +Cheliped +fixed finger with bifid sub-terminal spine. +Pereopod-1 +coxal spur well-developed; pereopod-1 substantially larger than rest. +Uropod +exopod 1-segmented, as long as ‘segment-1’ of endopod. +Male +: +Habitus +swimming form, pereonites 4–6 longer than pereonites 1–3 and pleonites. +Cephalothorax +about as long as broad. +Antennule +with 4-segmented flagellum, penultimate segment about as long as last segment. +Cheliped +fixed finger and dactylus shorter than palm of propodus. +Pereopod-1 +merus about as long as carpus. + + + + +Etymology. +From Te reo Māori adjective +r +ā +whiti +, ‘eastern’, a reference to the two records on the east coast of North and South Island. + + + + + + +Type +locality. + +Armer’s Bay +, +Kaikoura +, +South Island +, +New Zealand +, low intertidal muddy sand and red-algal turf + +. + + + + +Description. +Neuter/non-ovigerous female: Habitus +( +Fig. 31A +) typical + +Tanaopsis + +, small cephalothorax, irregular pereonite outline and wide pleon, slender, 7.5 times ltb; length +1.51–3.33 mm +. +Cephalothorax +pear-shaped, as long as broad, and as long as pereonites 1–2. +Pereon +57% of body length; pereonite-1 ( +Fig. 31B +) weakly trapezoidal, coxa projecting beyond anterolateral corner; pereonites 2–3 weakly hexagonal; all with rounded lateral corners; pereonite-5 longest; 0.3, 0.58, 0.7, 0.88, 0.98 and 0.64 times ltb respectively. +Pleon +wider than pereon, 22% of body length, as long as pereonites 5–6; pleonites 1 and 5 longer than 2–4, all with small epimeral seta. +Pleotelson +( +Figs 31C–D +) as long as pleonite-5 and half of pleonite-4, sub-conical with two posterior dorsal setae, two PSS and four apical setae (two deflexed). + + +Antennule +( +Fig. 31G +) almost as long as cephalothorax; article-1 half total length, with blunt-tipped setae on distal mesial and lateral margins; article-4 as long as article 2–3, with vestige of a small cap-like fifth terminal article; other setation as figured. +Antenna +( +Fig. 31H +) typical, article-2 larger than article-3, with long superior seta and smaller inferodistal seta; article-3 with long superior seta; article-4 4 times longer than broad, with a mesial PSS, three distal simple and two PSS; article-6 with thick (fused?) seta. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 32A +) typical, hood shaped. +Labium +not observed. +Mandibles ( +Figs 32B–C +) typical, with acuminate molar. +Maxillule ( +Figs 32D–E +) typical, endite bent at right-angle, with distal setae and six (?) terminal spines, + + +one much larger than rest. +Maxilla +not observed. +Maxilliped ( +Figs 32F–G +) typical; basis seta longer than endite; flared endite with distal seta. +Epignath ( +Fig. 32H +) typical, thin and strap-like. + + +Cheliped ( +Figs 31E +, +32J–M +) typical; coxal sclerite triangular, rear apex meeting posterior of cephalothorax; basis with large free posterior margin, overlapped by pereopod-1, with distolateral seta; merus with one seta; carpus 1.4 times ltb, with two inferior and two superior setae; propodus narrower and slightly longer than carpus, palm not distally wider, with lateral seta near dactylus insertion mesial comb of six spines; fixed finger 0.4 times propodal total length, with three superior distal and two inferior setae, incisive margin with three small distal teeth, bifid distal spine and bifid terminal spine; dactylus with weakly crenulated superior margin, and mesial seta, incisive margin with two small peg-like spines. + + +Pereopod-1 ( +Fig. 33A) largest of pereopods; coxa with acuminate spur bearing seta; basis with proximal seta; ischium with one seta; merus naked; carpus as long as merus, with three distal setae; propodus longer than merus and carpus together, with superior microtrichia, two superior distal and one inferodistal seta; dactylus shorter than unguis, together longer than propodus. +Pereopod-2 ( +Fig. 33B) about 0.75 times length of pereopod-1; coxa annular; basis four times ltb, ischium with one seta; merus as long as broad, naked; carpus just longer than merus, with three distal setae; propodus longer than merus and carpus, similar to that of pereopod-1; dactylus and unguis just longer than propodus. +Pereopod-3 ( +Fig. 33C) similar to pereopod-2 but shorter; basis 3.5 times ltb; merus, carpus, propodus and dactylus-unguis all shorter. + + +Pereopod-4 ( +Figs 33D–E) similar in length to pereopod-3; basis stouter, 2.9 times ltb, with an inferodistal PSS; ischium with two setae; merus longer than broad, with two stout inferodistal spines; carpus as long as merus, with three distal spines and one superior distal seta; propodus longer than carpus, superior margin with microtrichia and a PSS, with one superior distal and two inferodistal spines; dactylus longer than unguis, claw-like, together half as long as propodus. +Pereopod-5 ( +Fig. 33F) similar to pereopod-4 but basis with two inferior PSS. +Pereopod-6 ( +Fig. 33G) similar to pereopods 4–5 but basis with simple inferior seta, propodus with three pectinate superior distal spines. + + +Pleopod ( +Fig. 32N +) typical, endopod shorter and wider than exopod, with distomesial seta and 8–9 distolateral setae, with naked proximal lateral margin; exopod lateral margin with continuous fringe of 25–26 setae. + + +Uropod ( +Fig. 31F +) typical, exopod half length of endopod; endopod with pseudo-segmentation marked by two PSS. + + +Manca-III: Habitus +stouter than non-ov. female; length +1.13–1.22 mm +. + + +Male +: +Habitus +( +Fig. 34A +) typical swimming male, fairly stout, 4.6 times ltb, length +1.42–1.43 mm +. +Cephalothorax +as long as broad, flask-shaped, +epistome +( +Fig. 34B +) prominent, acuminate. +Pereon +46% of body length, pereonites 1–3 subequal, pereonites 4–5 twice as long as 1–3. +Pleon +not much wider than pereon, 27% of total length. +Pleotelson +( +Fig. 34C +) conical, with more prominent apical process than female. + + +Antennule +( +Fig. 34D +) peduncle article-1 stout, about 40% of total length; flagellum segment-1 very short, segment-3 longer than segment-2, subequal to segment-4; segments 1-3 with inferior bundle of aesthetascs; other setation as figured. + + +Mouthparts +(not figured) typical of genus, reduced. + + +Cheliped +( +Figs 34E–F +) similar to female but carpus stouter, 1.2 times ltb; palm with mesial comb of thirteen spines. + + +Pereopod-1 +( +Fig. 34G +) similar to female but coxa without spur, other articles more slender; carpal and propodal setae longer; dactylus and unguis only as long as propodus. +Pereopod-3 +( +Fig. 34H +) similar to female but more slender. +Pereopod-4 +( +Fig. 34 +) similar to female but basis with two pinnate setae; meral and carpal spines more slen- der. + + +Pleopod +(not figured) with setae longer than in female. + + +Uropod +( +Fig. 34C +) exopod 2-segmented; endopod 2-segment, segment-1 with proximal band of PSS. + + + + +Remarks. +This +New Zealand +species is very similar to the West European + +T. graciloides +, + +differing in the presence of a mandibular molar. If using the key given by +Sieg & Dojiri (1991) + +T. rawhitia + + +n. sp. + +would appear in couplet ‘5’, close to the undescribed Antarctic species, but would be distinguished by the bifid sub-terminal spine on the cheliped fixed finger. The Australian species + +T. canaipa + +is easily distinguished by, among other things, its long cephalothorax, different pereonite shapes and 2-segmented uropod exopod. The uropod endopod of + +T. rawhitia + +is essentially 1-segmented or with barely visible pseudo-segmentation, it has gracile chela, and among the largest pereopod-1 coxal spur within the genus. Although substantial, the size disparity of pereopod-1 to the other pereopods is not as great as in + +T. chotkarakde +Bird & Bamber, 2000 + +. + + + + +Distribution and ecology. +Aside from the +type +locality, this new + +Tanaopsis +species + +has been recorded from Castlepoint, Wairarapa on the east coast of North Island. As with other species in this study, it may be quite common in sandy low intertidal and subtidal habitats. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC700648FF4C287AB06BF9B8.xml b/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC700648FF4C287AB06BF9B8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6ceb76e897f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC700648FF4C287AB06BF9B8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,467 @@ + + + +Paratanaoidean tanaidaceans (Crustacea: Peracarida) from littoral and shallow sublittoral habitats in New Zealand, with descriptions of three new genera and seven new species + + + +Author + +BIRD, GRAHAM J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2011-05-25 + + +2891 + + +1 + + +1 +62 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2891.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.2891.1.1 +1175­5334 +10095598 +1DF47466-0448-4EE7-8D7C-456BA1D0E152 + + + + + + + +Araphura whakarakaia + +n. sp. + + + + + + +Figs 23–26 + + + + +Material examined. + +Holotype + +: neuter/non-ovigerous female, +2.54 mm +, Aotea Harbour, muddy sand, 8/4/10, GJB/ 5-10, [CR.21789]. + + +Paratypes + +: one neuter partly dissected on microslide, GJB/5-10, [CR.21790]; one neuter, +PB Stn +2.2, [CR.21791]; two neuters, one ov. female, +PB Stn +10.3, [CR.21792]; 13 neuters/non-ov. females, two prep. males, GJB/5-10, [ +NIWA +: 70537]; one prep. male [?}, O.543/BS.799, [CR.21808]. +Other material: +two neuters/ non-ov. females, GJB/2-10; two neuters/non-ov. females, GJB/2-10; four neuters, one post-ov. female, one prep. male, GJB:RW/19-11. + + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Female: +Araphura + +with +pereonites 2–4 +just longer than broad. +Pleotelson +shorter than broad, with apical process. +Antenna +article-4 without fusion-line. +Mandible +molar broad, coarsely denticulate. +Cheliped +carpus, palm, fixed finger and dactylus with rows of nodules. +Pereopods 1–3 +carpus with one spine and one seta. +Uropod +exopod reaching two-thirds of endopod segment-1. + + + + +Etymology. +From Te reo Māori adjective +whakar +ā +kai +, ‘ornate’ [as in a carving]; this alludes to the nodulose cheliped carpus, propodus and dactylus. + + + + + + +Type +locality. + +Pourewa Point +, +Aotea Harbour +, +Waikato +, +North Island +, +New Zealand +, low intertidal sand + +. + + + + +Description. +Neuter +[body proportions refer to largest individuals]: +Habitus ( +Figs 23A +) typical + +Araphura + +, shiny-white, cheliped crenulations clearly visible in dorsal view under low magnification; very slender, 9.9 times ltb; length +1.84–2.71 mm +. +Cephalothorax +( +Fig. 23B +) elongate, almost as long as pereonites 1–2, 1.7 times ltb with anterolateral seta; coxal sclerites form entire posterioventral part of cephalothorax and are fused ventromesially, with complex depression posterior to cheliped bases. +Pereon +59% of body length, pereonites parallel-sided with slightly rounded corners, all with anterolateral seta; pereonites 1 and 6 shortest, equally long, pereonites 0.67, 1.1, 1.2, 1.2, 1.0, and 0.75 times as long as broad respectively. +Pleon +( +Fig. 23C +) 16% of body length, just shorter than pereonites 5–6, sternites with raised keel-like processes, epimera with simple seta. +Pleotelson +( +Figs 23D–E +) pentagonal, as long as pleonites 4–5, 0.8 times as long as broad, with two posteriolateral setae and two simple and two pinnate posterior seta; with small apical process bearing two setae. + + +Antennule ( +Fig. 23H +) typical, article-1 2.6 times ltb; article-4 with six setae and one aesthetasc. +Antenna ( +Fig. 23J +) typical, article-4 five times ltb, without fusion line. + + +Labrum ( +Fig. 24A +) typical, distally setose. +Labium ( +Fig. 24B +) typical, with few anterolateral setules. +Mandibles ( +Figs 24C–F +) typical, left and right incisors denticulate, lacinia mobilis narrow with two denticles; molars relatively broad with blunt and acuminate apophyses. +Maxillule ( +Fig. 23G +) typical, endite with eight terminal spines, one pectinate. +Maxilla ( +Fig. 23H +) elongate, located posteriolaterally to maxillipeds. +Maxilliped ( +Figs 23J–K +) typical, set on ovoid pedestal; endite with mesial round spine, mesial seta, and setose anterolateral margin. + + +Cheliped ( +Figs 23F +, +24L–M +) basis with free posterior process small; carpus 1.6 times ltb, inferior margin crenate; propodus with crenate superior distal margin and lateral crenate ridge extending onto fixed finger, palm with two mesial spines; dactylus with nodulose superior margin and one mesial seta. + + +Pereopod-1 ( +Fig. 25A) typical for genus, small relative to body size; coxa with seta; basis shorter than distal articles combined, with a superior PSS; ischium with one seta; merus 1.4 times ltb, with two inferior setae; carpus pleon sternal processes (lateral view); D pleotelson; E pleotelson apical process (lateral view); F right cheliped (dorsal view); G uropod; +paratype +non-ovigerous female: H antennule; J antenna. Scale bars: (i) +1 mm +for A; (ii) +0.25 mm +for B–C, +0.125 mm +for D–E; (iii) +0.125 mm +for G–J. distal seta; dactylus shorter than unguis, with accessory seta, together subequal to propodus. +Pereopod-2 ( +Fig. 25B) similar to pereopod-1 but carpus and propodus slightly shorter, propodus without superior seta. +Pereopod-3 ( +Fig. 25C) similar to pereopod-2. + + + +FIGURE 23. + +Araphura whakarakaia + + +n. sp. + +Holotype non-ovigerous female: A dorsum; B cephalothorax (ventral view); C + + + + +FIGURE 24. + +Araphura whakarakaia + + +n. sp. + +Paratype non-ovigerous female: A labrum; B labium; C–D left and right mandibles; E–F left and right molars; G maxillule endite, distal; H maxilla; J maxilliped; K maxilliped palp articles 2–4; L right cheliped; M right chela (mesial view). Scale bars: (i) 0.125 mm for A–D and H–M; (ii) 0.05 mm for E–G. + + + + +FIGURE 26. + +Araphura whakarakaia + + +n. sp. + +Paratype small neuter: A dorsum; Allotype preparatory male: B dorsum; C antennule. Scale bars: (i) 1 mm for A–B; (ii) 0.125 mm for C. + + + +Pereopod-4 ( +Figs 25D–E) basis slightly broader than pereopods 1–3, with two large inferior PSS; ischium with rior distal spine and two inferior distal spines, all delicately pectinate; dactylus longer than unguis, together as long as propodus. +Pereopod-5 ( +Fig. 25F) similar to pereopod-4. +Pereopod-6 ( +Fig. 25G) similar to pereopods 4–5 but basis without PSS; propodus with two pectinate spines and one longer smooth (?) superior distal spine. + + +Pleopod ( +Fig. 25H) typical of genus, relatively small; endopod with distomesial seta, lateral margin with about six setae, naked for proximal half; exopod broader, with one proximal seta and about fifteen other lateral setae separated by small gap. + + +Uropod ( +Fig. 23G +) just longer than pleotelson; fused exopod held close to endopod, elongate, reaching just over two-thirds length of endopod segment-1, setation typical of genus; endopod slender, segment-1 about twothirds total length, with one simple and two distal PSS, segment-2 with five unequal simple setae and two PSS. + + +Neuter [small]: Habitus +( +Fig. 26A +) +similar to larger neuter/non-ovigerous female but only 8.7 times ltb; length +1.49–1.66 mm +. +Pereonites 2–4 +shorter than broad, +pereonite-6 +shorter. + + +Ovigerous female +: similar to non-ovigerous female; length +2.22 mm +. The single specimen with six large ova in marsupium. + + +Post-ovigerous female +: similar to ovigerous female (dorsoventrally compressed) but lacking oostegites; length +2.29 mm +. + + +Preparatory male: Habitus +( +Fig 26.B +) similar to female/neuter but pleon more developed, 19 % of body length; length +1.78–2.24 mm +. +Antennule +( +Fig. 26C +) thicker. +Pleopods +larger. + + + + +Remarks. +This + +Araphura +species + +resembles the Californian + +A. cuspirostris + +Dojiri & Sieg, +1997 + + +in possession of a small, square, apical process on the pleotelson, and the nodulose chelipeds are rare among described species of this genus. This ‘ornamentation’ is also expressed in + +A. elongata +(Shiino) + +, from the subantarctic South Shetland Islands and, among others, the apparently unrelated genera + +Chauliopleona +Dojiri & Sieg, 1997 + +, + +Akanthophoreus +Sieg, 1986 + +, + +Kanikipa + + +n. gen. + +(see below), and + +Tanaissus +Norman & Scott. An + +adaptationist view of these nodulose (or, alternatively, crenulated) chelipeds has been put forward by Bird & +Heard +(in prep), namely that they may assist traction between sand-grains, since many of the taxa mentioned have been recorded in sandy substrata. + + +If it were not for the pleotelson process and cheliped nodules, + +A. whakarakaia + + +n. sp. + +would appear at the same position as + +A. higginsi + +Sieg & Dojiri +1989 + + +in the Larsen +et al +(2009) key. Its pereopods 1–3 all have a reduced carpal setation, with a single superior spine and one inferior seta; this is the same pattern as in + +A. joubinensis +Sieg & Dojiri 1989 + +. In the +type +species, + +A. brevimanus + +, three carpal setae (or spines) are present. + +Araphura whakarakaia + + +n. sp. + +has the most robust mandible molars of any + +Araphura +species + +, comparable only to + +A. elongata + +or + +A. spinithenari +Larsen 2005 + +, but it does not essentially diverge from the generic pattern of distal denticles, variously enlarged or reduced. + + +A small elongate swimming male ( +1.32 mm +) was also recorded in one of the Aotea Harbour samples (GJB/5- 10) but it was in relatively poor condition and more evidence is required before it can be confidently assigned to + +A. whakarakaia + +. + + + + +Distribution and ecology. +It is only known from four localities: the west coast of North Island at Aotea Harbour and offshore Ninety Mile Beach, +Northland +at +53 m +; the Cook Strait region of North Island, and off the +Canterbury +coast, South Island, at +0–14 m +( + +Knox +et al +1978 + +, listed only as ‘Tanaid sp.1’). Recorded sympatric tanaidaceans are + +Paratanais tara + + +n. sp. + +and + +Kanikipa portobelloensis + + +n. gen. +n. sp. + +(see below). It shows a typical pattern for shallow soft-sediment dwelling tanaidaceans, being tolerant of intertidal situations as well as sublittoralshelf habitats and appears to be an ecological equivalent of + +A. brevimanus + +from British and north European waters ( +Holdich & Jones 1983 +). It is probably much more common and widespread than these records suggest. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC71064EFF4C2F58B705F9A1.xml b/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC71064EFF4C2F58B705F9A1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..db0591b353c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/63/BB/3763BB7FBC71064EFF4C2F58B705F9A1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + +Paratanaoidean tanaidaceans (Crustacea: Peracarida) from littoral and shallow sublittoral habitats in New Zealand, with descriptions of three new genera and seven new species + + + +Author + +BIRD, GRAHAM J. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2011-05-25 + + +2891 + + +1 + + +1 +62 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2891.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.2891.1.1 +1175­5334 +1DF47466-0448-4EE7-8D7C-456BA1D0E152 + + + + + + +Family + +Tanaellidae +Larsen & Wilson, 2002 + + + + + + + +Remarks. +This establishment of this family was an outcome of the first major analysis of the phylogenetics of the +Paratanaoidea +( +Larsen & Wilson 2002 +). Although relatively restricted in known genera ( + +Araphura +Bird & Holdich, 1984 + +; + +Araphuroides +Sieg, 1986 + +; + +Arthrura +Kudinova-Pasternak + +; and + +Tanaella +Norman & Stebbing + +) it is well represented by many species, particularly of + +Araphura + +and + +Tanaella + +, in the deep sea. Several species from bathyal +New Zealand +waters remain to be described. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/64/26/376426A6624BB6A9CE9178C17B76EF3F.xml b/data/37/64/26/376426A6624BB6A9CE9178C17B76EF3F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..103bc02deb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/64/26/376426A6624BB6A9CE9178C17B76EF3F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@ + + + +The genus Macroteleia Westwood (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae s. l., Scelioninae) from China + + + +Author + +Chen, Hua-yan + + + +Author + +Johnson, Norman F. + + + +Author + +Masner, Lubomir + + + +Author + +Xu, Zai-fu + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +300 + + +1 +98 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.300.4934 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.300.4934 +1313-2970-300-1 + + + + + +Macroteleia +rufa +Szelenyi + +Plates 5152 + + + + +Macroteleia rufa + +Szelenyi +1938 + +: 91, 92 (original description); +Kozlov and Kononova 1987 +: 94, 95 (keyed); +Kozlov and Kononova 1990 +: 189, 190, 197 (description, keyed); +Petrov 1994 +: 96 (comparison with +Macroteleia angelovi +Petrov); +Kononova 1995 +: 70, 72 (keyed); +Kononova and Petrov 2003 +: 605 (keyed); +Kononova and Kozlov 2008 +: 231, 235 (description, keyed, synonym). + + +Macroteleia eremicola +Priesner 1951 +: 137 (original description); +Masner and Muesebeck 1968 +: 39 (type information); +Kononova and Kozlov 2008 +: 235 (junior synonym of +Macroteleia rufa +Szelenyi +). + + + +Description. +Female. Body length 4.55-6.62 mm (n=10). +Color. Head and mesosoma yellowish brown; metasoma with T1 and T6 variably dark brown to black, otherwise yellow; mandible dark brown; palpi yellow; legs yellow throughout; A1 yellow, A2-A5 dark brown, remainder of antenna black; fore wing hyaline. + +Head +. Transverse in dorsal view, 1.30 +-1.44x +as wide as long, slightly wider than mesosoma; lateral ocellus contiguous with inner orbit of compound eye; POL 1.36 +-1.46x +LOL; occipital carina continuous medially, irregularly punctate; central keel weakly developed above interantennal process (Plate 52A); medial frons punctate rugulose ventrally, irregularly smooth dorsally; ventrolateral frons punctate rugose; frons below median ocellus densely punctate; vertex densely punctate, interspaces in part with microsculpture; gena punctate rugose; length of A3 1.09 +-1.19x +length of A2. + + +Mesosoma +. Cervical pronotal area densely punctate; dorsal pronotal area areolate rugose; lateral pronotal area longitudinally striate dorsally, punctate rugulose ventrally; netrion punctate rugulose; notaulus narrow, irregularly foveolate; middle lobe of mesoscutum densely punctate, becoming denser anteriorly and at posterior end; lateral lobe of mesoscutum densely punctate, interspaces in part with microsculpture; mesoscutellum densely punctate throughout; metascutellum triangular (Plate 52B), posterior margin strongly produced medially, extending into space between propodeal lobes; propodeum narrowly divided into two subtriangular lobes (Plate 52B), each side with several irregular longitudinal carinae medially, otherwise punctate rugulose, covered by dense, recumbent, white setae; upper mesepisternum with a row of strong longitudinal carinae below subalar pit; lower mesepisternum longitudinally punctate rugulose; mesopleural depression smooth (Plate 52C); metapleuron longitudinally striate dorsoventrally, punctate rugulose medially. + + +Legs. Slender; hind femur weakly swollen, 4.10 +-4.37x +as long as its maximum width; hind tibia without spines over outer surface; hind basitarsus 10.14 +-11.33x +as long as its maximum width. + + +Wings. Apex of fore wing extending from as far as anterior third to mid-length of T4; R 1.38 +-2.08x +as long as r-rs, R1 1.67 +-2.08x +length of R. + + +Metasoma +. Posterior margin of transverse sulcus on T2 strongly convex (Plate 52D); sublateral tergal carinae developed on T1-T3; T1 densely longitudinally striate medially, with scattered punctures in interstices anteriorly, rugulose laterally; T2-T3 densely longitudinally striate medially, with delicate punctures in interstices, punctate rugulose laterally; T4-T5 densely finely longitudinally striate throughout, with delicate punctures in interstices; T6 finely punctate dorsally, densely longitudinally striate laterally, with scattered small punctures in interstices; length of T3 0.82 +-0.94x +length of T6; T5 distinctly longer than wide; S2-S4 longitudinally striate, with finely punctate rugulose interstices; S5-S6 longitudinally striate, with finely punctate interstices; prominent longitudinal median carinae present on S2-S5. + +Male. No specimens were available for this study. + + +Plate 51. +Macroteleia rufa +Szelenyi +, female from Guangdong, Guangzhou, Tianlu Lake. A Dorsal habitus B Lateral habitus. + + + + +Plate 52. +Macroteleia rufa +Szelenyi +, female from Guangdong, Guangzhou, Tianlu Lake. A Head, anterior view B Head and mesosoma, dorsal view C Head and mesosoma, lateral view D Metasoma, dorsal view. + + + + +Distribution. +China (Guangdong, Hainan); Thailand. This species is also recorded in Egypt, Ukraine, Russia, Georgia and Tajikistan. Link to distribution map [http://hol.osu.edu/map-large.html?id=4863]. + + +Material examined. +The holotye is deposited in Hungarian Nature History Museum, Budapest. + +Other material. CHINA: 1 ♀, Guangdong, Zijin County, Linjiang Town, +23°39'N +, +114°41'E +, 1.VIII.2003, Jingxian Liu, SCAU 000044 (SCAU); 2 ♀, Guangdong, Xinfeng, Mt. Yunji, +24°04'N +, +114°10'E +, 19.VII.2003, Yanxia Song, SCAU 000045, 000046 (SCAU); 1 ♀, Guangdong, Mt. Nankun, +23°37.941'N +, +113°50.182'E +, 2.VII.2005, Zaifu Xu, SCAU 000047 (SCAU); 4 ♀, Guangdong, Guangzhou, Tianlu Lake, +23°13'N +, +113°25'E +, 6.X.2002, Zaifu Xu, SCAU 000048-000051 (SCAU); 1 ♀, Hainan, Mt. Yinggeling, +18°49'N +, +109°11'E +, 17-20.VII.2010, Huayan Chen, SCAU 000052 (SCAU). THAILAND: 1 ♀, Chiang Mai, Maerim, 10-12.III.2003, MT, R. A. Beaver, No. 26778 (RABC). + + + +Comments. + +The identification of this species is based on pictures of holotype of +Macroteleia rufa +(deposited in Hungarian Nature History Museum, Budapest) kindly provided by Dr. Ovidiu A. Popovici (University 'Al. I. +Cuza' +Iasi +) and his personal communication. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/64/78/37647816F2E8576E8D851066F6264D37.xml b/data/37/64/78/37647816F2E8576E8D851066F6264D37.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b4cccb5914e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/64/78/37647816F2E8576E8D851066F6264D37.xml @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ + + + +Updating the knowledge of sand flies (Diptera, Psychodidae) in Rondonia State, Brazil + + + +Author + +Pereira Junior, Antonio Marques +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2936-1857 +Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz Rondonia, Porto Velho, Brazil & Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Epidemiologia da Amazonia Ocidental, Porto Velho, Brazil +junior.ampj@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Moreno Magalhaes de Souza +Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz Rondonia, Porto Velho, Brazil + + + +Author + +Medeiros, Jansen Fernandes +Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz Rondonia, Porto Velho, Brazil & Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Epidemiologia da Amazonia Ocidental, Porto Velho, Brazil + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2022 + +2022-09-16 + + +10 + + +90015 +90015 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e90015 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e90015 +1314-2828-10-e90015 +6DA101C8AAF151B081811854C477EAA8 + + + + +Psychodopygus ayrozai (Barretto & Coutinho, 1940) + + + +Distribution + +Buritis, +Cacaulandia +, Campo Novo, +Itapua +do Oeste, +Ji-Parana +, Monte Negro, Nova +Mamore +, Porto Velho, Vale do Anari + + + +Notes + +Azevedo et al. 1993 +, +Galardo et al. 2015 +, +Gil et al. 2003 +, + +Leao +et al. 2020 + +, + +Pereira +Junior +et al. 2019a + +, + +Pereira +Junior +et al. 2019b + +, +Resadore et al. 2017 +, +Silva et al. 2021 +, +Torchitte et al. 2020 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/64/B5/3764B5733C599F34D3B48BBD301E03BE.xml b/data/37/64/B5/3764B5733C599F34D3B48BBD301E03BE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..346e34eda14 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/64/B5/3764B5733C599F34D3B48BBD301E03BE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,235 @@ + + + +Revision of the Lacinipoliavicina (Grote) complex (Noctuidae, Noctuinae, Eriopygini) + + + +Author + +Schmidt, B. Christian + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +527 + + +103 +126 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.527.9686 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.527.9686 +1313-2970-527-103 +3A7D6C6E78374B1FA82A0B6975E958B9 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Lepidoptera Noctuidae + + + +Lacinipolia acutipennis (Grote, 1880) +stat. rev. +Figs 28-54, 58, 62, 66, 72 + + + + +Mamestra acutipennis +Grote, 1880: 214. + + +Mamestra doira +Strecker, 1898: 7, syn. rev. + + +Mamestra ascula +Smith, 1905b: 257, syn. rev. + + +† Polia pensilis ab. indistincta +Strand, 1917: 28, unavailable; infrasubspecific name. + + +Lacinipolia subalba +Mustelin, 2000: 13, syn. n. + + + +Type material. + +Mamestra acutipennis +: type female (BMNH; examined); type locality: Nevada. +Mamestra doira +: type female (FMNH, examined); type locality: Utah. +Mamestra ascula +: lectotype male designated by Poole (1982), (AMNH, examined); type locality: Stockton, Utah. +Lacinipolia subalba +: South rim of Los +Penasquitos +Canyon, 76 m, San Diego Co., California (SDNHM). + + + +Diagnosis. + +Lacinipolia acutipennis +is a western steppe / grassland species that shows considerably greater regional phenotypic variation than others in the +Lacinipolia vicina +group. In more mesic habitats (including higher elevations) of the Pacific Northwest and central Rocky Mountains +Lacinipolia acutipennis +is replaced by the very similar +Lacinipolia pensilis +. The two occur sympatrically in many transitional habitats, mostly dry montane woodlands at +moderate +elevations. Although phenotypes of +Lacinipolia acutipennis +from the most arid habitats (e.g., Figs 34-39) can be distinguished from +Lacinipolia pensilis +with relative ease, many northern +Lacinipolia acutipennis +populations in the Pacific Northwest are dark, well-marked and very similar to +Lacinipolia pensilis +, which makes identifying the two very difficult and led previous workers to conclude that they represent the same species. Compounding this difficulty is the lack of conspicuous genitalic differences that are otherwise typical of the genus. Despite the identification difficulties in the Pacific Northwest, other sympatric populations of +Lacinipolia acutipennis +and +Lacinipolia pensilis +have clearly different phenotypes. Differences are most pronounced in Great Basin populations ( +Lacinipolia pensilis +, Figs 25, 27 and +Lacinipolia acutipennis +, Figs 49-51) and in the northern Rockies/Great Plains (e.g., Montana +Lacinipolia pensilis +, like those in Figs 23, 24, and +Lacinipolia acutipennis +, Figs 46-48). The two differ in male genitalia structure as discussed below. These differences, in addition to a minimum 2.5% divergence in DNA barcodes (Fig. 75), show that (at least) two species are involved. + + + +Figure 75. Neighbour-joining tree of representative mtDNA barcode haplotypes in species of the +Lacinipolia vicina +group. Sample size and locality are given in brackets, with number of specimens indicated after two-letter state/province abbreviation. +Lacinipolia sareta +variation is divided into five haplogroups, +A-E +. Voucher specimen data is given in Suppl. material 1. + + + +Similar phenotypes of +Lacinipolia acutipennis +and +Lacinipolia pensilis +differ in the shape and size of the forewing, which averages more acute and smaller in +Lacinipolia acutipennis +; the brown tones of the medial forewing are more muted in +Lacinipolia acutipennis +compared to +Lacinipolia pensilis +, giving an overall lower contrast in tone of the medial area with the grey-black antemedial and postmedial areas; the white spot in the anal angle is often more prominent in +Lacinipolia acutipennis +, particularly in females; the forewing apex has a more contrastingly pale diffuse area that usually extends farther towards the reniform. In the male genitalia of +Lacinipolia acutipennis +, the spinose crest of the phallus usually has a thin, delicate apically-directed spine (which is sometimes broken off, in which case the spine base is still evident), which is absent in +Lacinipolia pensilis +; this thin spine is sometimes absent also in +Lacinipolia acutipennis +, but in such individuals the entire crest is small and with fewer, smaller cornuti (Fig. 61c) compared to +Lacinipolia pensilis +(Fig. 62). + + +Two phenotypes have been recognized as separate species, +Lacinipolia doira +of the Great Basin (Figs 49-51) and +Lacinipolia subalba +of southern California (Figs 43-45). Clinal phenotypic variation, lack of diagnostic structural characters, and similarity in DNA barcodes, lead me to treat - +doira +and - +subalba +as regional forms. + + + + +Distribution +and biology. + + +Lacinipolia acutipennis +is a western species common throughout xeric, low elevation habitats of western North America. The core range includes the dry, western portions of the Great Plains, the Great Basin, and the western intermontane valleys north of the Sonoran zone, from southern Saskatchewan and Alberta southward to northern Arizona and New Mexico. Reports from Wisconsin (cited in +Forbes 1954 +), Texas and southern Arizona ( +Hampson 1905 +) are probably misidentifications of +Lacinipolia sareta +. +Crumb's +(1954) records from Nebraska and Kansas are plausible; the easternmost specimens I examined were from Watford City in western North Dakota. In the intermontane valleys west of the Rocky Mountains +Lacinipolia acutipennis +occurs from southern British Columbia to southern California and northernmost Arizona and New Mexico (Fig. 72). All Pacific Northwest specimens examined from subalpine habitats and from sites west of the Coast Ranges proved to be +Lacinipolia pensilis +. + + +The larval description and host plants require clarification since the information given by +Crumb (1956) +and +Godfrey (1972) +was probably based on both +Lacinipolia acutipennis +and +Lacinipolia pensilis +. The larvae likely are general feeders and may ascend shrubs to feed. +Lacinipolia acutipennis +flies in late summer with most specimens recorded from mid-August to late September. + + + +Remarks. + +The name +acutipennis +has historically been associated with the taxon +Lacinipolia sareta +(i.e. +Lacinipolia vicina +of authors) rather than +Lacinipolia pensilis +. This apparently stemmed from the fact that historical +Lacinipolia acutipennis +specimens from western Nevada (the type locality of +Lacinipolia acutipennis +) and adjacent northeastern California had been wrongly associated; a series from Truckee, California, examined by Lloyd Martin (and probably others before him, including McDunnough) consists of male +Lacinipolia sareta +and female +Lacinipolia acutipennis +, but only the male +Lacinipolia sareta +were previously dissected. Female +Lacinipolia sareta +from the northern Sierra Nevada and especially Nevada are considerably paler. Comparison of the type female of +Lacinipolia acutipennis +to all other +Lacinipolia vicina +-group taxa occurring in the region of the type locality shows that +Lacinipolia acutipennis +is a dark female of the low-elevation taxon previously treated as a form of +Lacinipolia pensilis +. + +Variation in the DNA barcodes (Fig. 75) could be indicative of cryptic species, but genitalic structure is highly conserved and phenotypic blending is apparent from regions where adequate samples were available. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/64/C7/3764C71869A3460EA5312D90600E9ABF.xml b/data/37/64/C7/3764C71869A3460EA5312D90600E9ABF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f624a71da06 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/64/C7/3764C71869A3460EA5312D90600E9ABF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ + + + +Karyotypes of Chironomus Meigen (Diptera: Chironomidae) species from Africa + + + +Author + +Wuelker, Wolfgang F. + + + +Author + +Kiknadze, I. I. + + + +Author + +Istomina, A. G. + +text + + +Comparative Cytogenetics + + +2011 + +1 + + +23 +46 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/compcytogen.v5i1.975 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/compcytogen.v5i1.975 +1993-078X-1-23 + + + + +Chironomus transvaalensis Kieffer, 1923 + + + +Previous reports: + +Kieffer 1923 +, imago. + +Mc Lachlan 1969, 1971: larva and pupa. + +Freeman 1957 +, imago. + + +Martin 1979 +, banding sequence of chromosome arm F. + + + +Wuelker +et al. 1989 + +, banding sequences of arms A, E, and F, phylogenetic position of species. + + + +Karyotype + +(Fig. 2a). Haploid number n=4, arm combination AE CD BF G ( +"pseudothummi" +cytocomplex), centromeric bands not heterochromatinized, nucleolus in arm C, inversion polymorphism in arms C and G. + +Banding sequences (Fig. 2b-f). + + +Figure 2b-f. Homozygous banding sequences of +Chironomus transvaalensis +in arms A, E, C, D and F. + + +Arm A (Fig. 2b) has the sequence trvA1, differing by only one inversion step from the basic sequence holA1. + +Arm E (Fig. 2c) has the banding sequence trvE1, differing only by one step from basic sequence aciE1 ( +Chironomus acidophilus +Keyl, 1960 etc.) + + +Arm C (Fig. 2d, j) has two banding sequences, trvC1 and trvC2, differing by one simple inversion (Fig. 2j). The sequence trvC1 is formed by four inversion steps from a basic sequence, (lonC1), found in several +Chironomus +species ( +Chironomus longistylus +Goetghebuer, 1921, +Chironomus anthracinus +Zetterstedt, 1860 etc.). + + + +Figure 2g-j. Homozygous and heterozygous banding sequences of +Chironomus transvaalensis +in arm G ( +g-i +) and heterozygous inversion in arm C (j). Brackets above arms indicate the localization of inversions. The designations are the same as in Fig. 1. + + +Arm D (Fig. 2e) has the sequence trvD1 differing from pigST by four inversion steps. +Arm B (Fig. 2a) not mapped, monomorphic. BR is well developed. +Arm F (Fig. 2f) has the banding sequence trvF1 differing from cosmopolitan basic pigST by three inversion steps. + +Arm +G (Fig. 2g-i) has three banding sequences, trvG1, trvG2, and trvG3. The sequence trvG2 differs from trvG1 by a short inversion in the region BR1 (Fig. 2h); the sequence trvG3 - by long inversion of central part of arm G (Fig. 2i). Both last sequences were found as heterozygotes. There are four Balbiani rings. + + +In total, the banding sequence pool of +Chironomus transvaalensis +contains 10 sequences, all of them are Ethiopian endemic sequences. + + + +Larva: +tubuli laterales at abdominal segment VII. Other characters - Mc Lachlan, 1969. + + +Distribution: + +various places in Africa, +Freeman (1957) +; Blantyre Malawi (Mc Lachlan), +Wuelker +, 1957: pool east Lake Victoria, Kikuwi-river, Tanzania (J. Grunewald), Pretoria South Africa, Israel (Martin, personal communication). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/65/59/3765590CDA91D38DED5B770AAB17C4F1.xml b/data/37/65/59/3765590CDA91D38DED5B770AAB17C4F1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a95362afb7b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/65/59/3765590CDA91D38DED5B770AAB17C4F1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,508 @@ + + + +Description of a new species of Music frogs (Anura, Ranidae, Nidirana) from Mt Dayao, southern China + + + +Author + +Lyu, Zhi-Tong + + + +Author + +Mo, Yun-Ming + + + +Author + +Wan, Han + + + +Author + +Li, Yu-Long + + + +Author + +Pang, Hong + + + +Author + +Wang, Ying-Yong + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +858 + + +109 +126 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.858.34363 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.858.34363 +1313-2970-858-109 +8AA495F6CCC34E00B37BBAF5A598A2ED +8AA495F6CCC34E00B37BBAF5A598A2ED + + + + +Nidirana yaoica +sp. nov. + + + +Chresonymy. + +Nidirana adenopleura +: +Fei et al. 2009 +(Mt. Dayao, Jinxiu, Guangxi); +Mo et al. 2014 +(Jinxiu, Guangxi) + + + +Holotype. + + +SYS a007022 +(Fig. 3), +adult +male +, collected by +Zhi-Tong Lyu +on +1 June 2018 +from +Mt Dayao +( +24.1602N +, +110.2304E +; ca +1190 m +a.s.l.), + +Jinxiu Yao Autonomous County + +, +Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region +, +China +. + + + + +Figure 3. Morphological features of the adult male holotype SYS a007022 of +Nidirana yaoica +sp. nov. in life. A dorsolateral view B ventral view C left hand D poorly developed nuptial pad E left foot F surface of posterior dorsum and hind limbs. + + + + + +Paratypes. + +SYS a007009 +, +7011-7013 +, +7020-7021 +, +SYS a007014 +/ +CIB 110013 +, +seven +adult +males +collected by +Zhi-Tong Lyu +, +Yu-Long Li and Cheng-Yu Yang +on + +30 +May- +1 June 2018 + +from the same locality as the holotype. + + +NHMG 1503043-47 +, +five adult males +collected by +Yun-Ming Mo +and +Wei-Cai Chen +on +19 March 2015 +from the neighboring locality as the holotype ( +24.1035N +, +110.2294E +; ca +1350 m +a.s.l.). + + + + +Etymology. + +The specific name +yaoica +is an adjective derived from Yao, referring to the type locality of the new species, Mt Dayao in Jinxiu Yao Autonomous County, where the settlement of the Yao people is located. We suggest its English common name to be Mt Dayao music frog and its Chinese name Yao Qin Wa (瑶琴蛙). + + + +Differential diagnosis. + +Nidirana yaoica +sp. nov. is distinguished from its congeners by the following combination of the morphological characteristics: (1) body medium-size and stocky, with SVL 43.8 ++/- +1.7 (40.4-45.9, n = 13) mm in adult males; (2) disks of digits dilated, pointed; (3) lateroventral grooves present on every digit; (4) heels overlapping; (5) tibio-tarsal articulation reaching at the nostril; (6) mid-dorsal stripe present; (7) posterior of dorsal skin rough with dense tubercles but without spinules; (8) week supernumerary tubercles below the base of fingers III and IV, palmar tubercles prominent and distinct; (9) a pair of subgular vocal sacs present; (10) one single nuptial pad present on the first finger, nuptial spinules invisible; (11) suprabrachial gland large; (12) calling: 1-3 fast-repeated regular notes. + + + +Description of holotype. +Adult male. Body stocky, SVL 44.6 mm; head longer than wide (HDW/HDL 0.92), flat above; snout rounded in dorsal and lateral views, slightly protruding beyond lower jaw, longer than horizontal diameter of eye (SNT/ED 1.26); canthus rostralis distinct, loreal region concave; nostril round, directed laterally, closer to the snout than to the eye; a longitudinal swollen mandibular ridge extending from below nostril through lower edges, eye and tympanum to above insertion of arm, where the ridge is intermittent, forming a maxillary gland and shoulder gland; supratympanic fold absent; interorbital space flat, narrower than internasal distance (IND/IOD 1.37); pupil elliptical, horizontal; tympanum distinct, round, TD/ED 0.72, and close to eye, TED/TD 0.38; pineal ocellus present; vomerine ridge present, bearing small teeth; tongue large, cordiform, notched behind. +Forelimbs moderately robust, lower arm 19% of SVL and hand 27% of SVL; fingers thin, relative finger lengths II <I <IV <III; tip of each finger slightly dilated and remarkable elongated, forming long pointed disks; well-developed lateroventral grooves on all fingers, not meeting at the tip of disks; fingers free of webbing; presence of weak lateral fringes on inner and outer sides of fingers II, III and IV, and on outer side of finger I; subarticular tubercles prominent and rounded; week supernumerary tubercles below the base of fingers III and IV; three elliptic, large, prominent and very distinct palmar tubercles. + +Hindlimbs relatively robust, tibia 53% of SVL and foot 78% of SVL; heels overlapping when hindlimbs flexed at right angles to axis of body; tibio-tarsal articulation reaching the nostril when hindlimb is stretched along the side of the body; toes relatively long and thin, relative lengths I <II <V <III <IV; tip of each toe slightly dilated with remarkable elongated ventral callous pad, forming long and pointed disk; well-developed lateroventral grooves on toes, not meeting at the tip of disks; webbing moderate, webbing formula: I 2 - +21/2 +II 1⅔ - 3 III 2⅓ - +31/2 +IV +31/2 +- 2 V; presence of lateral fringes on inner and outer sides of each toes, forming distinct dermal flap on the lateral edges of toes I and V; subarticular tubercles rounded, prominent; inner metatarsal tubercle elliptic, twice as long its width; outer metatarsal tubercle indistinct, small and rounded; tarsal folds and tarsal tubercle absent. + +Dorsal skin of head and anterior body smooth, posterior dorsum of body rough with dense tubercles but not bearing horny spinules; developed dorsolateral fold from posterior margin of upper eyelid to above groin but intermittent posteriorly; flank relatively smooth with dense tubercles on region nearly the dorsolateral fold; a large and smooth suprabrachial gland behind base of forelimb, slightly prominent; dorsal surface of upper arm with two longitudinal ridges and slightly extending to lower arm; the dorsal surfaces of thigh and tibia with several longitudinal ridges and tubercles bearing spinules. Ventral surface of head, body, and limbs smooth; large flattened tubercles densely arranged on the rear of thigh and around vent. + + +Color in life of holotype. +Dorsal surface of head and body reddish brown; pineal ocellus yellowish; a longitudinal reddish brown mid-dorsal stripe edged with broad dark brown, beginning from snout, across pineal ocellus, posteriorly extending to vent; several black spots on upper eyelids and posterior dorsum of body; dorsolateral fold bicolor, upper part reddish brown and lower part black; upper flank yellowish brown with irregular black spots; lower flank yellowish white; suprabrachial gland yellowish brown. Dorsal forelimbs reddish brown; a longitudinal black stripe on the anterior surface of the forelimb; irregular black marks on dorsal surface of the forelimb; dorsal hindlimbs non-uniform dark brown, four black crossbars on the thigh, three on the tibia and three on the tarsus; irregular black marks on dorsal toes. Loreal and temporal regions black, tympanum dark brown; upper ⅓ iris bright brownish white and lower ⅔ iris reddish brown; maxillary gland and shoulder gland yellowish white. Lips and throat grey white, but two subgular vocal sacs slightly dark colored; ventral surface of body and limbs creamy white; rear thigh tinged with pink; ventral hand and foot pale white with large black patches. + + +Color in preservative of holotype. +Dorsal surface faded, but dark brown edges of the mid-dorsal stripe more distinct; black spots on dorsum more distinct; upper flank black; limbs faded, the crossbars clearer; ventral surface faded, throat and posterior of chest with smoky gray markings. + + +Variations. +Measurements of type series are given in Table 3. All specimens were similar in morphology. Dorsal surface light brown in SYS a007009 (Fig. 4A), 7011, 7013 and 7020; mid-dorsal stripe begins from pineal ocellus in SYS a007011, 7013, 7014, 7020 and 7021 (Fig. 4B), unclear in SYS a007009; pineal ocellus invisible in SYS a007009. + + +Figure 4. A, B paratypes SYS a007009 and SYS a007021 of +Nidirana yaoica +sp. nov. C habitat of +Nidirana yaoica +sp. nov. in the type locality in Mt Dayao D the holotype SYS a007022 in wild. + + + + +Table 3. Measurements (in mm) of the type series of +Nidirana yaoica +sp. nov. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Specimens No. +SYS +a007022 (holotype) + +SYS +a007009 + +SYS +a007011 + +SYS +a007012 + +SYS +a007013 + +SYS +a007014 / +CIB +110013 + +SYS +a007020 + +SYS +a007021 + +NHMG +1503043 + +NHMG +1503044 + +NHMG +1503045 + +NHMG +1503046 + +NHMG +1503047 + +summarizing of measurement (minimum-maximum, mean ++/- +SD +) +
Sex
SVL
HDL
HDW
SNT
IND
IOD
ED
TD
TED
HND
RAD
FTL
TIB
HDL/SVL
HDW/SVL
HDW/HDL
SNT/HDL
SNT/SVL
IND/HDW
IOD/HDW
ED/HDL
ED/SVL
TD/ED
TED/TD
HND/SVL
RAD/SVL
FTL/SVL
TIB/SVL
+ + + +Male secondary sexual characteristics. +A pair of subgular vocal sacs, a pair of slit-like openings at posterior of jaw; a single light brown nuptial pad on the dorsal surface of first finger, nuptial spinules invisible; suprabrachial gland present. + + +Distribution and ecology. + +Currently, +Nidirana yaoica +sp. nov. is known only from the type locality, Mt Dayao, Jinxiu, Guangxi, in southern China. This frog inhabits in the swamps and ponds surrounded by moist subtropical secondary evergreen broadleaved forests (Fig. 4C, D). The adult male calls in the brushwood at the bank, from mid-March to late May. Nevertheless, the females, tadpoles, and much of the ecology and behavior of this species remain unknown. + + + +Vocalization. + +The call spectrograms are shown in Fig. 5 and the measurement parameters are listed in Table 4. The advertisement call (n = 87) of +Nidirana yaoica +sp. nov. contains 1-3 rapidly repeated, identical, regular notes with the PF of 516.8 Hz and note IQR-BW of 172.3 Hz or 0 generally. The one-note call (n = 25) has a duration of 43.3 ++/- +2.7 ms with the rise time of 10.1 ++/- +4.5 ms. The two-note call (n = 59) has a duration of 355.9 ++/- +31.1 ms; the first note lasts 43.5 ++/- +2.8 ms with the rise time of 8.5 ++/- +4.6 ms, and the second lasts 39.6 ++/- +3.3 ms with the rise time of 11.6 ++/- +4.4 ms; the note interval last 272.8 ++/- +31.7 ms. + + + +Figure 5. Advertisement call spectrograms of +Nidirana yaoica +sp. nov. A one-note call B two-note call; C three-note call. + + + + +Table 4. Vocalization parameters of paratype SYS a007009 of +Nidirana yaoica +sp. nov. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
one-note call (n = 25)two-note call (n = 59)three-note call (n = 3)
Call duration (ms)
Note duration (ms)stst
ndnd
rd
Note rise time (ms)stst
ndnd
rd
Note interval (ms)st
nd
Call PF (Hz)
Note PF (Hz)stst
ndnd
rd
Note IQR-BW (Hz)stst
ndnd
rd
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/65/67/376567EBD25D841899A1A22FBD5C776A.xml b/data/37/65/67/376567EBD25D841899A1A22FBD5C776A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c3bd7884f92 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/65/67/376567EBD25D841899A1A22FBD5C776A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Texas spiders + + + +Author + +Dean, David Allen +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America +a-dean-ento@tamu.edu + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +2016-03-02 + + +570 + + +1 +703 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.570.6095 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.570.6095 +1313-2970-570-1 +CE0DA439F6F64DCF82255700A3C50098 +E376FF8EFFF1F22C326D1E0DFF8BFFDF +579094 + + + + +Dictyna bellans Chamberlin, 1919 + + + + +Dictyna bellans +Agnew et al. 1985 +: 3; +Breene et al. 1993b +: 647; +Breene et al. 1994 +: 8; +Chamberlin and Gertsch 1958 +: 62, mf, desc. (pl. 16, figs 4-7); +Jackman 1997 +: 163; +Knutson et al. 2010 +: 515; +Pfannenstiel 2008a +: 204; +Young and Edwards 1990 +: 16 + + +Dictyna longispina +Emerton, 1888; +Gertsch and Mulaik 1940 +: 329; +Jones 1936 +: 69; +Kagan 1942 +: 11; +Kagan 1943 +: 258; +Vogel 1970b +: 7; +Young and Edwards 1990 +: 16 [misidentified, Texas records] + + + +Distribution. +Eastern 2/3 Texas; Archer, Baylor, Brazos, Cameron, Clay, Coleman, Comal, Comanche, Dallas, Erath, Fannin, Hidalgo, Howard, Hunt, Leon, Llano, McLennan, Navarro, Palo Pinto, Runnels, San Saba, Scurry, Travis, Val Verde, Wichita, Willacy + + +Locality. +Bentsen-Rio Grande Valley State Park, Lake Thomas + + +Caves. + +San Saba +(Copperhead Cave) + + + +Time of activity. +Male (February, April - December); female (April - May, July - December) + + + +Habitat +. + + +(crops: cotton, peanuts, sugarcane); (grass: grass); (landscape features: cave); (plants: miscellaneous vegetation, + +Baccharis + +); (soil/woodland: juniper, saltcedar, trees/shrubs, woods, + +Hibiscus + +sp., + +Ulmus crassifolia + +) + + + +Method. +Beating [m]; D-Vac suction [mf]; pitfall trap [f]; sweeping [m] + + +Type. +Mississippi, Canton + + +Etymology. +Latin, behavior, film + + +Collection. +DMNS, MSU, TAMU, TMM + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/65/83/3765830013F77853C46858C44D6A699D.xml b/data/37/65/83/3765830013F77853C46858C44D6A699D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e43277b97f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/65/83/3765830013F77853C46858C44D6A699D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Castoridae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +842 +842 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + +Castoridae Hemprich 1820 + + + + + +Castoridae Hemprich 1820 +, +Grundriss Naturgesch.: 33 + +. + + + + +Synonyms: +Castorini Giebel 1855 +; +Castorida Haeckel 1866 +; + +Castoroidea +Gill 1872 + +. + + + + +Genera: +1 genus with 2 species: + + +Genus + +Castor +Linnaeus 1758 + +(2 species) + + + + +Discussion: +Generally placed as the sole extant family of the sciurognath infraorder +Castorimorpha +(Carleton, 1984; +McKenna and Bell, 1997 +), beavers are probably most closely allied to geomyoid rodents ( +Geomyidae ++ +Heteromyidae +; see + +Murphy et al., 2001 +a + +; +Montgelard et al., 2002 +). There are a number of additional fossil synonyms that do not refer to crown-group beavers ( +McKenna and Bell, 1997 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/65/87/376587E0FFB2F4056EA8FF49FEBBFEBA.xml b/data/37/65/87/376587E0FFB2F4056EA8FF49FEBBFEBA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..00fadebd399 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/65/87/376587E0FFB2F4056EA8FF49FEBBFEBA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,630 @@ + + + +A new scale insect host family (Hemiptera: Asterolecaniidae) for Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in China + + + +Author + +Zhu Hong Wang + + + +Author + +Jun Qing Ge + + + +Author + +Hui Zhang + + + +Author + +Zhengli Zhang + + + +Author + +Yu Si + + + +Author + +Jian Huang + + + +Author + +Andrew Polaszek + +text + + +Journal of Natural History + + +2019 + +2019-06-10 + + +53 + + +15 + + +923 +937 + + + +journal article +23988 +10.1080/00222933.2019.1618509 +2c902394-1936-4afa-a073-ffc258f6860f +1464-5262 +3673172 +0BE6DB64-CB75-466A-B974-8A620FAFEA1E + + + + + + + +Aphytis bambusaspis +Wangı Huang & Polaszekı + +sp. nov. +( +Figures 1–6 +) + + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +CE94E2FE-6E3A-4904-ACDB-DD2CDA3EC48F + + + + + + +Female + + +Length 0.85 +– +1.00 mm. + + +Colour + + +General colour yellow. Mandibles black-brown, eyes pale green, ocelli rufous ( +Figure 1 +(a,b)). +Head + + + +Figure 1. + +Aphytis bambusaspis + + +sp.nov +. + +female. (a) body in dorsal view; (b) body in ventral view; (c) pupa in ventral view. + + + +Eyes finely setose. Mandibles well-developed, with one large sharply pointed tooth and a denticle merging into a dorsal truncation; maxillary palpi 2-segmented, labial palpi 1-segmented. Setae on head pale, frontovertex reticulate. Antenna slender, 6-segmented, antennal formula 1,1,3,1; scape 6.04 +– +6.07 times as long as wide, 1.11 +– +1.16 times longer than club; pedicel 1.75 +– +1.91 times as long as wide, considerably (1.31 +– +1.58 times) longer than F3; F1 somewhat trapezoidal, 1.80 +– +1.94 times as wide as long; F2 nearly symmetrical, nearly equal to F1, 1.41 +– +1.47 times as wide as long; F3 1.11 +– +1.40 times as long as wide, with one longitudinal sensillum; club 3.23 +– +3.28 times as long as wide and considerably wider than the preceding segment, bearing 5 +– +6 longitudinal sensilla ( +Figures 2 +(a), 3(b,c)). + + + +Figure 2. + +Aphytis bambusaspis + + +sp.nov +. + +female. (a) antenna; (b) ovipositor; (c) fore wing; (d) stigmal vein of fore wing; (e) metanotum, propodeum and petiole. + + + + +Figure 3. + +Aphytis bambusaspis + + +sp.nov +. + +female. (a) submarginal vein of fore wing, showing 3 coarse setae on submarginal vein; (b) mouthparts, showing mandibles and maxillary palpi; (c) labial palpi; (d) mesosoma. + + + +Mesosoma + + +Setae on mesosoma slender and pale, pronotum and mesonotal sclerites reticulate. Mid-lobe of mesoscutum with 11 setae, the posterior pair distinctly longer than the others; each sidelobe with 2 setae, each axilla with 1 seta; scutellum with 4 setae, placoid sensilla closer to the anterior pair. Metanotum short, with reticulate sculpture except at sides, slightly arcuate. Propodeum with posterior margin nearly straight, 2.62 +– +2.71 times as long as metanotum, 0.58 +– +0.71 times as long as scutellum, reticulate broadly in wide central area and weakly at sides; crenulae large, distinctly elongate, sharply tooth-shaped, non-overlapping, 4 + 5 to 6 + 6 forming 2 submedian lobes somewhat separated ( +Figures 2 +(e), 3(d)). + + + +Figure 4. + +Aphytis bambusaspis + + +sp.nov +. + +male. (a) body in dorsal view; (b) body in ventral view; (c) pupa in ventral view. + + + +Fore wing + + +Fore wing hyaline, 2.93 +– +3.06 times as long as wide, marginal fringe 0.23 +– +0.27 times as long as width of wing disk; delta area below marginal vein with 41 +– +54 setae in 6 +– +7 rows, these considerably longer and sparser than the setae distad of speculum; 5 +– +8 setae below distal portion of submarginal vein; costal cell with 2 +– +4 fine setae near base and 1 coarse seta at apex. Submarginal vein usually bearing 3 coarse setae. Marginal vein bearing 11 +– +13 prominent, subequal setae along anterior margin ( +Figures 2 +(c,d), 3(a)). + + +Metasoma + + +Petiole reticulate centrally. T1-T4 reticulate laterally, bearing 2 +– +3 setae in each reticulate area; T5 reticulate laterally and sparsely reticulate centrally, with a row of 8 setae; T6 mostly reticulate, bearing a row of 6 setae between spiracles; T7 triangular and reticulate, bearing 12 +– +14 setae. Cerci close to posterior spiracles, with 2 long setae and 1 short seta. Ovipositor long, basally located at T2, slightly projecting beyond apex of metasoma, 2.24 +– +2.39 times as long as mid tibia; third valvular 0.61 +– +0.72 times as long as mid-tibia. Mid-tibial spur 1.00 +– +1.10 times as long as length of corresponding basitarsus ( +Figure 2 +(b)). + + +Male + + +Length + +0.53 +– +0.78 mm + +. Essentially similar to the female in structure, chaetotaxy, sculpture and coloration, differing mainly in antenna 5-segmented, antennal formula 1,1,2,1, and mid basitarsus dark brown and the corresponding second tarsus paler brown ( +Figures 4 +(a,b), 5(a), 6(b)). + + + +Figure 5. + +Aphytis bambusaspis + + +sp.nov +. + +male. (a) antenna; (b) genitalia; (c) mesosoma; (d) fore wing. + + + +Antennal scape 4.79 +– +6.28 times as long as wide, 1.01 +– +1.15 times as long as club, without any specialised sensory area on the ventral surface; pedicel 1.69 +– +1.77 times as long as wide; F1 1.04 +– +1.20 times as wide as long, F2 1.22 +– +1.48 times as long as wide, bearing one longitudinal sensillum; club 3.38 +– +3.92 times as long as wide, 2.04 +– +2.38 times longer than the preceding segment, bearing 2 +– +4 longitudinal sensilla. Mid-lobe of mesoscutum with 12 setae, each side-lobe with 2 setae, each axilla with 1 seta, scutellum with 4 setae. Fore wing 2.87 +– +2.96 times as long as wide; delta area below marginal vein with 20 +– +37 setae in 3 +– +5 rows. Submarginal vein with 3 coarse setae. Marginal vein with 7 +– +12 prominent setae along anterior margin. Genitalia 0.64 +– +0.72 times as long as mid tibia ( +Figures 5 +, +6 +(a)). + + + +Figure 6. + +Aphytis bambusaspis + + +sp.nov +. + +male. (a) metanotum, propodeum and petiole; (b) mid leg, showing the basitarsus dark brown and the corresponding second tarsal segment paler brown. + + + + +Table 2. +Main diagnostic characteristics of species groups of + +Aphytis + +and + +Aphytis bambusaspis + +sp.n. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Group/speciesBody colourAntennalsegmentsPropodeumCrenulae
+ +chilensis + +group +Rather strongly4 6, ♁ 4Relatively long;Large, overlapping; or small,
pigmentedor shortnonoverlapping
+ +proclia + +group +Greyish or dusky; black4 6, ♁ 6Relatively long;Elongate, relatively narrow,
cephalicor shortnonoverlapping; or
pigmentationrounded, slightly
overlapping
+ +mytilaspidis + +group +Generally yellow with4 6, ♁ 6Relatively shortSmall, nonoverlapping
coarse, dark thoracic
setae
+ +lingnanensis + +group +Yellow4 6, ♁ 6Relatively longLarge, overlapping
+ +chrysomphali + +group +Yellow4 6, ♁ 6Very longSmall, nonoverlapping
+ +funicularis + +group +Yellow4 5, ♁ 5ShortSmall, nonoverlapping,
generally forming one
continuous row
+ +Aphytis bambusaspis + +Yellow4 6, ♁ 5ShortLarge,distinctlyelongate,
sp.n.sharply tooth-shaped,
nonoverlapping
+ + +Pupa + + +The pupa of + +A.bambusaspis + +sp.nov. +is predominantly black ( +Figures 1 +(c), 4(c)). + + +Species-group placement + +Unassigned. + + + +Host + + +Asterolecaniidae +: +Bambusaspis notabilis +(Russell), a new scale host family for + +Aphytis + +. + + + + +Distribution + + +China +( +Fujian +). + + + + +Etymology + + +The species epithet is derived from its host genus name +‘Bambusaspis’ +, referring to the new scale host for the genus + +Aphytis + +. + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Aphytis bambusaspis + +sp.nov. +, associated exclusively with an +Asterolecaniidae +scale host, differs from all other species of + +Aphytis + +in the following characters: propodeal crenulae large, distinctly elongate, sharply tooth-shaped, nonoverlapping. Submarginal vein bearing 3 setae. Antenna with sexual dimorphism, female 6-segmented and male 5-segmented, compared with that in the + +chilensis + +group which the male antenna appears to be 4-segmented (the first 2 funicular segments greatly reduced or absent), and the club is very strongly developed and elongate. Mid basitarsus of male evidently dark brown and the corresponding second tarsus paler brown, while in all the described species of + +Aphytis + +, only the male of + +A. mazalae +DeBach & Rosen + +is characterised by black on the basal half of the mid basitarsus. The morphological identification indicated that the new species does not belong to any known species groups of + +Aphytis + +( +Table 2 +). + + + + +Type material + + + +Holotype +♀ +, Z179, ex. + +Bambusaspis +notabilis + +(Russell) on bamboo. +China +: +Fujian +, +Fuzhou +, +Jinshan +, +Fujian +Agriculture +and +Forestry University +( +FAFU +), +Zhonghua +botanical garden, + +13.xii.2015 + +, coll. Zheng-Li +Zhang +( +FAFU +) + +. + +Paratypes +: +2♀ +, Z177, Z178, same data as holotype; +2♀ +, Z186, Z188, 23, Z185, Z187, same data as +holotype +except for +19 + +. xii + +.2015, ( +FAFU +); +1♀ +, Z176, 13, Z184, same data as holotype ( +Natural History Museum +, +London +, +UK +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/65/B9/3765B9B8F182FB0E009B1C78D0D3867B.xml b/data/37/65/B9/3765B9B8F182FB0E009B1C78D0D3867B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..856083315c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/65/B9/3765B9B8F182FB0E009B1C78D0D3867B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Sawflies, ' Symphyta' + + + +Author + +Liston, Andrew D. + + + +Author + +Knight, Guy T. + + + +Author + +Sheppard, David A. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1168 +1168 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 +1314-2828--1168 +3C3EC7B09BA145848E3E89CBBD28B432 +3C3EC7B09BA145848E3E89CBBD28B432 + + + + +Athalia Leach, 1817 + + + + +DENTATHALIA +Benson, 1931 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/65/D8/3765D89E2D4E9E4DBCA180D31A6A35C3.xml b/data/37/65/D8/3765D89E2D4E9E4DBCA180D31A6A35C3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b302fff73f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/65/D8/3765D89E2D4E9E4DBCA180D31A6A35C3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part H) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +557 +585 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Hypericum cajense +Linnaeus + +, + +Plantae Surinamenses + +: 13. 1775 + + +. + + + +"Habitat [in Surinamo.]" RCN: 5738. + + +Type not designated. + + +Original material: none traced. + + + +Note: +The application of this name seems uncertain. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/66/22/376622820C7F58F85911B7A2E069DD4B.xml b/data/37/66/22/376622820C7F58F85911B7A2E069DD4B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b5b77903503 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/66/22/376622820C7F58F85911B7A2E069DD4B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ + + + +Inventory of the Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera) in Komaba Campus of the University of Tokyo, a highly urbanized area in Japan + + + +Author + +Ishikawa, Tadashi + + + +Author + +Saito, Masayuki U. + + + +Author + +Kishimoto-Yamada, Keiko + + + +Author + +Kato, Toshihide + + + +Author + +Kurashima, Osamu + + + +Author + +Ito, Motomi + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +4981 +4981 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4981 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4981 +1314-2828--4981 + + + + + +Chilocoris confusus +Horvath +, 1919 + + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +T. Ishikawa & K. Kishimoto-Yamada +; individualCount: +2 +; sex: +2 males +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2014-01467 | 2014-01468; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1919; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hemiptera; family: Cydnidae; genus: Chilocoris; specificEpithet: confusus; scientificNameAuthorship: +Horvath +; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Tokyo; municipality: Meguro-ku; locality: +The University of Tokyo Campus, Komaba. +; minimumElevationInMeters: 31; maximumElevationInMeters: 39; decimalLatitude: +35.66006 +; decimalLongitude: +139.68521 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +T. Ishikawa +; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: samplingProtocol: +Berlese funnel +; eventDate: +2013-11-28 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +KMUT +; collectionCode: +IC + + + + +Notes +First record in Tokyo. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/66/2E/37662E19D9F7367B176F9C233C8B1A7D.xml b/data/37/66/2E/37662E19D9F7367B176F9C233C8B1A7D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fae24d0c222 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/66/2E/37662E19D9F7367B176F9C233C8B1A7D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + +The medicinal plants of Myanmar + + + +Author + +DeFilipps, Robert A. +Deceased + + + +Author + +Krupnick, Gary A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1357-4826 +Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC- 166, Washington, DC, 20013 - 7012, USA +krupnick@si.edu + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2018 + +2018-06-28 + + +102 + + +1 +341 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.102.24380 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.102.24380 +1314-2003-102-1 +AA226A35FFF8FFBC37621A40C2518C67 +1306325 + + + + +Urtica dioica L. + + + +Names. + +English +: ortie, stinging nettle. + + + +Range. +China, Afghanistan, Central Himalayas; northern Africa, Europe, and North America. Widespread in temperate regions of both hemispheres. + + +Conservation status. + +Least Concern [LC] ( +IUCN 2017 +). + + + +Use. + +Root +: Used as a diuretic. + + + +Notes. + +In India the whole plant is used as an anthelmintic, a local irritant in paralysis, for nephritis, menorrhagia, jaundice, and a decoction is astringent: the leaf is used for wounds and boils, also locally for sprains and rheumatism; the leaf and root are used in an infusion for dandruff; the seed and root are used for diarrhea; and an unspecified plant part is used as a hemostatic for uterine hemorrhage and bleeding from the nose ( +Jain and DeFilipps 1991 +). + + + +Reference. + +Nordal (1963) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/66/52/37665240C4DC5FE4B48954BB74543689.xml b/data/37/66/52/37665240C4DC5FE4B48954BB74543689.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8e63b549905 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/66/52/37665240C4DC5FE4B48954BB74543689.xml @@ -0,0 +1,315 @@ + + + +Elaphomyces castilloi (Elaphomycetaceae, Ascomycota) and Entoloma secotioides (Entolomataceae, Basidiomycota), two new sequestrate fungi from tropical montane cloud forest from south Mexico + + + +Author + +de la Fuente, Javier Isaac +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4667-1574 +Colegio de Postgraduados, Km 36.5 Montecillo, Texcoco, 56230, Estado de Mexico, Mexico + + + +Author + +Garcia-Jimenez, Jesus +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9290-1460 +Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico, Instituto Tecnologico de Ciudad Victoria, Blvd. Emilio Portes Gil # 1301 Pte, 87010, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico +jgarjim@yahoo.com.mx + + + +Author + +Raymundo, Tania +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7525-0034 +Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biologicas, Departamento de Botanica, Laboratorio de Micologia, 11340, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico + + + +Author + +Sanchez-Flores, Marcos +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5630-3084 +Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico, Instituto Tecnologico de Ciudad Victoria, Blvd. Emilio Portes Gil # 1301 Pte, 87010, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico + + + +Author + +Valenzuela, Ricardo +Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biologicas, Departamento de Botanica, Laboratorio de Micologia, 11340, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico + + + +Author + +Guevara-Guerrero, Gonzalo +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2707-4531 +Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico, Instituto Tecnologico de Ciudad Victoria, Blvd. Emilio Portes Gil # 1301 Pte, 87010, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico + + + +Author + +Perez-Ovando, Erika Cecilia +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3463-4736 +Instituto de ciencias biologicas, Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas, Libramiento Norte Poniente, 29039, Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas, Mexico + + + +Author + +Martinez-Gonzalez, Cesar Ramiro +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0256-0840 +Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico, Instituto Tecnologico de Ciudad Victoria, Blvd. Emilio Portes Gil # 1301 Pte, 87010, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico + +text + + +MycoKeys + + +2023 + +2023-04-03 + + +96 + + +127 +142 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.96.98320 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.96.98320 +1314-4049-96-127 +C3527B6C92745423A8688552CE7AE1FE + + + + + + +Entoloma secotioides J. +Garcia +, Guevara & de la Fuente + +sp. nov. + + + + +. Fig. 5A-F + + + +Type material. + + +Holotype +. + +Mexico. Chiapas: la Trinitaria Municipality, Lagunas de Monte bello, alt. 1004 m, +16°53'N +, +93°27'W +, 16 August 2019, J. +Garcia +18817 (Holotype-ITCV). + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Entoloma secotioides + +is characterized by cream colored, sulcate, secotioid basidiomata, not anastomosed gills, and angular basidiospores (7-13 +x +5-9 +µm +). + + + +Etymology. + +Named + +Entoloma secotioides + +due to the secotioid basidiomata. + + + +Description. + +Pileus 12-15 mm, subglobose, flattened when young, becoming depressed when mature, sulcate, pale yellow (4A3) to light yellow (4A5), slightly velvety, margin incurved enclosing the hymenium, dry in appearance, sometimes with brownish fibrils. Hymenophore lamellate, slightly irregular, pale orange to orange white (5A2) to light yellow (4A5), not exposed even in mature specimens. Stipe 4-9 +x +3-4 mm, cylindrical or absent, light yellow (4A5), smooth or finely fibrillose. Taste and odor fungoid, mild. + + + +Figure 5. + +Entoloma secotioides + +(Holotype) +A, B +basidiomata showing the pileus, hymenia, and stipe +C +peridium +D, E +details of the hymenium +F +basidiospores in KOH. + + + +Peridium +70-300 +µm +composed of loosely interwoven or horizontally arranged hyphae, 4-7 +µm +in diameter, septate, bifurcate, hyaline to pastel green in 5% KOH (27A4), not reacting with Melzer, with clavate terminal cells, thin-walled. +Hymenophoral trama +45-110 +µm +in diameter, composed of interwoven compacted hyphae, 4-9 +µm +in diameter, light orange in 5% KOH (5A4), thin-walled. +Basidia +27-35 +x +5-10 +µm +forming palisades, clavate, hyaline, thin-walled, embedded by a layer of loosely interwoven hyphae which arise from the trama, 6-11 +µm +diameter, sometimes branched, inflate at the septum, sometimes with terminal cells cystidioid or cylindrical, thin-walled. +Basidiospores +7-13 +x +5-9 +µm +, (L = 10.2, W = 7.1, Q = 1-2.2, n = 30), angular, rare nodulose, with 6-8 sides, some with conspicuous hilar appendix up to 3 +µm +, hyaline to pastel green (27A4), not reacting with Melzer reagent, smooth, thin-walled. + + + +Distribution. + +Known only from the state of Chiapas, growing sub hypogeous under + +Quercus + +sp. and + +Pinus + +sp. in montane cloud forest. + + + +Additional material studied. + + +Mexico +. +Chiapas +: +la Trinitaria Municipality +, + +Lagunas +de Monte + +bello, alt. + +1004 m + +, +16°53'N +, +93°27'W +, +16 August 2019 +, Guevara 1173 (Paratype-ITCV). ITS: +OP821421 + +; + +LSU: +OP824741 + +; + +RPB2: +KC265753 + +. + + + +Notes. + + +Entoloma secotioides + +is characterized by pale-cream basidiomata, enclosed, not anastomosed gills, and angular basidiospores 7-13 +x +5-9 +µm +. + +Entoloma calongei + +(E. Horak & G. Moreno) Noordel. & Co-David has gray-brown pileus, loculate gleba, and basidiospores 6-10 +µm +( +Horak and Moreno 1998 +); + +Entoloma chilensis + +(E. Horak) Noordel. & Co-David also has grayish pileus, loculate gleba, and basidiospores 9-11 +x +6.5-7.5 +µm +( +Horak 1963 +). Both species differ from + +E. secotioides + +mainly in the basidiomata color (pale-cream +vs. +grayish-brown) and hymenophore shape (slightly irregular +vs. +locules). The new species is phylogenetically close to + +E. asterosporum + +(Coker & Couch) T.J. Baroni & Matheny, differing from + +E. secotioides + +by having the globose sporome, pungent odor and smell, and larger spores (up to 16 +µm +) ( +Baroni and Matheny 2011 +). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/67/34/3767349D1F4950D1A96F90A9289D5904.xml b/data/37/67/34/3767349D1F4950D1A96F90A9289D5904.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dcf792f4a55 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/67/34/3767349D1F4950D1A96F90A9289D5904.xml @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + +Census of the longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae and Vesperidae) of the Macau SAR, China + + + +Author + +Lin, Mei-Ying +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 - 5 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang Dist., Beijing, 100101, China + + + +Author + +Perissinotto, Renzo +Institute for Coastal & Marine Research (CMR), Nelson Mandela University, P. O. Box 77000, Gqeberha 6031, South Africa +renzo.perissinotto@mandela.ac.za + + + +Author + +Clennell, Lynette +Macau Anglican College, 109 - 117 Avenida Padre Tomas Pereira, Taipa, Macau SAR, China + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2021 + +2021-07-22 + + +1049 + + +79 +161 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1049.65558 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1049.65558 +1313-2970-1049-79 +5D5EC2F0E9854C6EB55B5AD879C78A16 +2DD0CB1DF6045A1DA8B1DDF6163DC76F + + + + +Genus +Batocera Dejean, 1835: 341. + + + +Type species. + + +Cerambyx rubus + +Linnaeus, 1758. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/67/7D/37677D83A7A996683664B36ABDEBE058.xml b/data/37/67/7D/37677D83A7A996683664B36ABDEBE058.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a1ea3ca555e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/67/7D/37677D83A7A996683664B36ABDEBE058.xml @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ + + + +Revision of the subfamily Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) from Hunan (China), including thirty-six new species and two new genera + + + +Author + +Li, Xi-Ying + + + +Author + +Achterberg, Cornelis van + + + +Author + +Tan, Ji-Cai + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +268 + + +1 +186 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.268.4071 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.268.4071 +1313-2970-268-1 + + + + +Utetes longicarinatus Li & van Achterberg +sp. n. +Figs 374-383 + + + +Type material. +Holotype, ♂ (ZUH), "S. China: Hunan, Shanyang, Chengbu, Nan Mts., 16.VII.1985, Fu-Xing Li, No. 310". + + +Diagnosis. +Mandible triangular, normal (Fig. 380); ventral margin of clypeus truncate and thick; pronope slit-shaped and deep (Fig. 381); medio-posterior depression of mesoscutum elliptical, large and deep (Fig. 376); precoxal sulcus largely smooth; propodeum with complete medio-longitudinal carina (Fig. 376); vein m-cu of fore wing subinterstitial (Fig. 375); inner side of hind tibia with oblique carinula baso-laterally (Fig. 378). + + +Description. +Holotype, ♂, length of body 3.6 mm, of fore wing 3.8 mm. +Head. Antenna with 35 segments and 0.9 times as long as fore wing; length of third segment 1.3 times fourth segment, length of third, fourth and penultimate segments 2.5, 2.1and 1.5 times their width, respectively (Fig. 382); length of maxillary palp 0.7 times height of head; labial palp segments short; occipital carina moderately close to hypostomal carina and dorsally absent; hypostomal carina wide; length of eye in dorsal view 1.3 times temple; frons depressed behind antennal sockets and glabrous, smooth, medially convex (Fig. 381); face smooth, medially broadly elevated; width of clypeus 3.0 times its maximum height and 0.6 times width of face, clypeus evenly convex, sparsely punctate and its ventral margin truncate and thick (Fig. 380); hypoclypeal depression medium-sized (Fig. 379); malar suture obsolescent; mandible slightly convex (Fig. 380). +Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.2 times its height; pronope slit-shaped and deep (Fig. 381); pronotal side smooth (Fig. 374); epicnemial area more or less crenulate dorsally; precoxal sulcus largely smooth; rest of mesopleuron smooth; pleural sulcus smooth; notauli absent on disc, except for a short smooth part anteriorly (Fig. 376); mesoscutum glabrous; medio-posterior depression of mesoscutum elliptical, large and deep (Fig. 376); scutellar sulcus moderately crenulate; scutellum smooth and evenly convex; propodeum with complete medio-longitudinal carina, surface of propodeum largely reticulate-rugose (Fig. 377). + +Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 375): pterostigma triangular; 1-R1 reaching wing apex and 1.3 times as long as pterostigma; r:3-SR:SR1 = 11:53:100; 2-SR:3-SR:r-m = 40:53:20; r widened; 1-M weakly curved; 1-SR+M sinuate; SR1 nearly straight; m-cu subintersti +tial +; cu-a postfurcal and 1-CU1 widened; first subdiscal cell closed, CU1b short; apical quarter of M+CU1 sclerotized. Hind wing (Fig. 375): M+CU:1-M:1r-m= 47:40:33; cu-a straight; m-cu absent. + +Legs. Length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 2.8, 8.0 and 5.6 times as long as wide, respectively (Fig. 383); setae of hind femur and tibia moderately long; inner side of hind tibia with medium-sized carinula baso-laterally (Fig. 378). +Metasoma. Length of first tergite 0.8 times its apical width, its surface evenly convex medially and with longitudinal carinae and dorsal carinae separated from each other and reaching apex of tergite (Fig. 377); second and following tergites smooth. +Colour. Yellowish brown; apex of mandible, antenna, pleural sulcus (and its surroundings) and propodeum dark brown; basal half of first tergite, tarsus, pterostigma and veins brown; wing membrane subhyaline. +Molecular data. None. + + +Figure 374. +Utetes longicarinatus +sp. n., male, holotype. Habitus lateral. + + + + +Figures 375-383. +Utetes longicarinatus +sp. n., male, holotype. 375 Wings 376 mesosoma dorsal 377 propodeum and 1st-2nd metasomal tergites dorsal 378 base of hind tibia inner side 379 head anterior 380 mandible 381 head dorsal 382 antenna 383 hind leg. + + + + +Distribution. +*China (Hunan). + + +Biology. +Unknown. + + +Etymology. + +Name derived from +"longus" +(Latin for +"long" +) and +"carina" +(Latin for "keel, ridge") because of the long carina of the hind tibia. + + + +Notes. + +Runs in the key by +Chen and Weng (2005) +with difficulty to +Areotetes laevigatus +(Weng & Chen, 2005) comb. n., but +Utetes longicarinatus +has the ventral margin of the clypeus thick (thin in +Areotetes laevigatus +), the propodeum densely reticulate-rugose (mainly areolate), the second metasomal tergite smooth (finely striate) and pronope large and slit-shaped (large elliptical). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/67/8D/37678DE98CFFB92674C56E189DBC87AB.xml b/data/37/67/8D/37678DE98CFFB92674C56E189DBC87AB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0bbe46c9d95 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/67/8D/37678DE98CFFB92674C56E189DBC87AB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ + + + +New records and detailed distribution and abundance of selected arthropod species collected between 1999 and 2011 in Azorean native forests + + + +Author + +Borges, Paulo A. V. + + + +Author + +Gaspar, Clara + + + +Author + +Crespo, Luis Carlos Fonseca + + + +Author + +Rigal, Francois + + + +Author + +Cardoso, Pedro + + + +Author + +Pereira, Fernando + + + +Author + +Rego, Carla + + + +Author + +Amorim, Isabel R. + + + +Author + +Melo, Catarina + + + +Author + +Aguiar, Carlos + + + +Author + +Andre, Genage + + + +Author + +Mendonca, Enesima P. + + + +Author + +Ribeiro, Servio + + + +Author + +Hortal, Joaquin + + + +Author + +Santos, Ana M. C. + + + +Author + +Barcelos, Luis + + + +Author + +Enghoff, Henrik + + + +Author + +Mahnert, Volker + + + +Author + +Pita, Margarida T. + + + +Author + +Ribes, Jordi + + + +Author + +Baz, Arturo + + + +Author + +Sousa, Antonio B. + + + +Author + +Vieira, Virgilio + + + +Author + +Wunderlich, Joerg + + + +Author + +Parmakelis, Aristeidis + + + +Author + +Whittaker, Robert J. + + + +Author + +Quartau, Jose Alberto + + + +Author + +Serrano, Artur R. M. + + + +Author + +Triantis, Kostas A. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +10948 +10948 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 +1314-2828--10948 + + + + +Metophthalmus occidentalis Israelson, 1984 + + + +Ecological interactions + +Native status +Azores endemic + + + +Distribution +FAI; GRA; SMG; SMR + + +Notes +Biogeographical Realm: Cosmopolitan + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/67/F7/3767F707FFC2A832FF14EE2AFDE17420.xml b/data/37/67/F7/3767F707FFC2A832FF14EE2AFDE17420.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e4bc74f6245 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/67/F7/3767F707FFC2A832FF14EE2AFDE17420.xml @@ -0,0 +1,534 @@ + + + +New species of the genus Thinodromus Kraatz, 1857 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae, Oxytelinae) from India and Nepal + + + +Author + +Gildenkov, M. Yu. + +text + + +Far Eastern Entomologist + + +2019 + +2019-04-02 + + +381 + + +15 +20 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.25221/fee.381.3 + +journal article +10.25221/fee.381.3 +2713-2196 +7164975 +C8DD499F-4592-4AFB-B1F2-9EC4DE6DAB11 + + + + + + + +Thinodromus +(s. str.) +lenisus +Gildenkov + +, +sp. n. + + + + +http://zoobank.org/NomenclaturalActs/ +59A08AD5-4619-44D6-9465-5A010238B3A3 + + + + +Figs 1 +, +4–6 + + + + + +TYPE MATERIAL +. +Holotype +– +♂ +, + +North +India + +: +Uttarakhand state +, with labels “N- + + + +INDIA +: Uttaranchal state ca. +13km +NW Nainital Khairna Bridhe env. +900–1000m +, 13–17.VII + + +2003 + +leg. +Z. Kejval +& +M. Trýzna +” ( +NHMW +). +Paratypes +: the same labels as +holotype +, +1♂ + +, + + + +6♀♀ +, +7 ex. +( +NHMW +, cMG); + +Central +India + +: +Madhya Pradesh state +, +Hoshangabad district + +, + + + +with labels “ +INDIA +: ( +MP13 +) southern +Madhya Pradesh + +Hoshangabad Dist. +River + +Denwa + +, + + +28.II 2008 +leg. M.Jäch, S&P Sharma” and “ca. +8 km +SSE Matkuli Satpura Range ca. +400 m + + + +22°34´29´´N +/ +78°29´43´´E +”, +1♀ +( +NHMW +); + +Nepal + + +: + +Narayani province +, +Chitwan National Park + +, + + + +with labels “ +NEPAL +: +Chitwan NP +Narayani +Ganga, + +18.4.1995 + +27°33´N +84°06´E + +150m + +, leg + +. + + + +Malicky”, +1♂ +, +1♀ +, +1 ex. +( +NHMW +); +Narayani province +, with labels “ +NEPAL +, Prov. +Narayani + + + +Sauraha, +Rapti +River Ufer, +180 m +NN, 27°34´80´´N, +84°29´49´´E +LF +18.IV 2000 +, leg. A. + + + +Weigel”, +2♂♂ +, +4♀♀ +, +1 ex. +( +NKME +, cMG); +Koshi province +, Sankhuwasabha district, with labels “ +NEPAL +, Prov. +Koshi distr. +Sankhuwasabha Tumlingtar +, +Arun-Ufer +, +27°19.08´N + +, + + + +87°10.05´E + +310m + +NN, + +26.XI 1998 + +leg. +M. Hartmann +”, +1♀ +, +1 ex. +( +NKME +); +Lumbini province +, with labels “ +NEPAL +Tounsa +(sigoudi) +Kaynali +R +. + +XI 1987 + +P. Morvan +” and + + + +“Rougemont collection”, +1♂ +, (cGR). + + + + +DESCRIPTION. MALE ( +holotype +). Length about 3.0 mm. Colouration black, legs, antennae and mouthparts brown; integument slightly shining. Body with short, light-coloured hairs ( +Fig. 1 +). + +Head transverse, ratio of its length (from posterior margin of head to anterior margin of clypeus) to maximum width about 24:40. Temples barely developed, eyes large, convex, + +occupy entire lateral surface of head ( +Fig. 1 +). Head surface with exceedingly delicate, fine and dense punctation; individual punctures barely discernible. Puncture diameter incommen- + +surably smaller than eye facet, distances between punctures slightly longer than their diameter. +Antennae long, antennal segments 1–8 elongate; segments 9–10 slightly elongate; segment + +11 elongate, conical ( +Fig. 1 +). + +Pronotum wide, rounded, ratio of pronotum length to its maximum width about 33:45. + +Lateral margins of pronotum with 1 small tooth basally ( +Fig. 1 +). Surface of pronotum with exceedingly delicate, fine and dense punctation; individual punctures barely discernible. + + +Punctation similar to that on head, but punctures almost indiscernible ( +Fig. 1 +). Base of pro- + + +notal disc with prominent horseshoe-shaped depression ( +Fig. 1 +); central part of disc with 2 + + +small, shallow, symmetrical, oval depressions and 1 oval, shallow depression along pronotum midline near its anterior margin ( +Fig. 1 +). + + + +Figs 1–3. + +Thinodromus +spp. + +, body, dorsal view. 1 – + +T. lenisus + + +sp. n. + +(holotype, length – + + + +3.0 mm); 2 – +T. bernhaueri +( +Mongolia +, length – 3.2 mm); 3 – +T. schuelkei +( +China +: +Hubei +, + +length – 2.6 mm). + +Elytra wide, ratio of length of elytra to their combined width about 55:64. Surface of elytra with delicate, fine and dense punctation. Puncture diameter about 6 times as small as eye facet, distances between punctures slightly smaller than their diameter ( +Fig. 1 +). + + +Abdomen delicately shagreened ( +Fig. 1 +). + + +Aedeagus of characteristic structure ( +Figs 4–5 +). Sclerotised anterior rib of paramere not extending onto its plane, posterior edge of paramere slightly extended posteriorly at base and with small notch near midline, closer to apex ( +Fig. 5 +), anterior shield of internal sac of aedeagus shaped as 2 wide, low plates, rounded toward outer margin ( +Fig. 4 +). + +FEMALE. Similar to male in colouration and body proportions, sexual dimorphism absent. + +Spermatheca equally divided ( +Fig. 6 +). + + + + +DIAGNOSIS. The new species belongs to the +sericatus +species group. It is similar to +T +. + + +sericatus +and +T +. +sundukowi +that have very fine punctation on the surface of the pronotum + + +(which is barely discernible in contrast to an almost completely indistinct punctation in + +T +. + + + +lenisus +) and very fine and dense punctation on the surface of elytra, but differs in having a smaller size, indistinct punctation on the surface of the pronotum and a different structure of + + + +Figs 4–10. + +Thinodromus +spp. 4 + +–6 – + +T. lenisus + + +sp. n. + +(holotype); 7, 8 – T. bernhaueri + + + +( +Mongolia +); 9, 10 – +T. schuelkei +( +China +: +Hubei +); 4 – aedeagus, dorsal view; 7, 9 – edeagus without paramers, dorsal view; 5, 8, 10 – paramers, lateral view; 6 – spermatheca, lateral view. + +Scale bars: 0.25 mm. + +the aedeagus (Gildenkov, 2000a: 148, fig. 15; 2001: 827, fig. 2). + +T +. +lenisus + +can be distingui- + + +shed from all other species of the +sericatus +species group by very fine punctation on the surface of the elytra and indiscernible punctation on the surface of the pronotum ( +Figs. 1 +). It is clearly distinguishable from +T +. +eminens +and +T +. +puetzi +by the structure of the aedeagus + + +(Makranczy, 2016: 159, figs. 13–17; Gildenkov, 2000a: 23). + +T +. +lenisus + +is most similar in the structure of the aedeagus ( +Figs 4, 5, 7–10 +) to +T +. +bernhaueri +and +T +. +schuelkei +( +Figs 2, 3 +). The aedeagus of + +T +. +lenisus + +differs in the shape of the anterior shield of the internal sac, which is shaped as two wide, low plates, rounded toward the outer margin; in +T +. +bernhaueri +and +T +. + + +schuelkei, +the anterior shield of the internal sac is shaped as two rather short, straight plates + + +( +Figs 4, 7, 9 +). The aedeagus of the new species also differs in having darker parameres. It can be differentiated from the aedeagus of +T +. +schuelkei +by a distinct notch on the posterior margin of the parameres ( +Fig. 5 +). + + + + +DISTRIBUTION. +India +, +Nepal +. + + + + +ETYMOLOGY. From Latin “ +lenis +” (smooth) referring to the lack of apparent punctation on the surface of the pronotum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/68/0E/37680EB8256982B4C58EA3A9D07005DB.xml b/data/37/68/0E/37680EB8256982B4C58EA3A9D07005DB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c4f86b39c0c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/68/0E/37680EB8256982B4C58EA3A9D07005DB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,247 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Rubiaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/rubiaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Galium baldense +Spreng. + + + + + +Art ISFS: 177900 Checklist: 1020430 +Rubiaceae +Galium +Galium baldense Spreng. + + +Zusammenfassung +KEINE ANGABE + + + +Oekologie + + + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + +KEINE ANGABE + + +
+
+ + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl L--Salzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl T--
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +--
+ + + + +Nomenklatur + + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Galium baldense +Spreng. + + + + + +Volksname + + + +Deutscher Name: -- Nom +francais +: -- Nome italiano: -- + + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Galium baldense Spreng. + + +Checklist 2017 + +177900
= +Galium baldense Spreng. + + +Index synonymique 1996 + +177900
= +Galium baldense Spreng. + + +Landolt 1977 + +2801
= +Galium baldense Spreng. + + +SISF/ISFS 2 + +177900
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Status Indigenat +: - + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/68/87/376887CDFFA0FFD5FEE8FA9DE615DD18.xml b/data/37/68/87/376887CDFFA0FFD5FEE8FA9DE615DD18.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0bc926b2215 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/68/87/376887CDFFA0FFD5FEE8FA9DE615DD18.xml @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ + + + +The taxonomic status of Hyla roeschmanni De Grys, 1938 (Anura: Hylidae) + + + +Author + +Padial, José M. + + + +Author + +Köhler, Jörn + + + +Author + +Riva, Ignacio De La + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2006 + +1230 + + +63 +68 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.172727 +2a020815-611d-4d5d-830e-35337f31c798 +1175­5326 +172727 + + + + + + + +Hypsiboas raniceps +Cope, 1862 + + + + + + +Hypsiboas raniceps +Cope, 1862 + +, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 14: 353. +Syntypes +: USNM 5403 ( +4 specimens +), 5408 12160, 12172 ( +2 specimens +) according to Cochran, 1961, Bull. +U.S. +Natl. Mus., 220: 62. +Type +locality: Not mentioned specifically. +Type +locality given as " +Paraguay +" by Cochran, 1961, Bull. +U.S. +Natl. Mus., 220: 62. + + + + + +Hyla spegazzinii +Boulenger, 1889 + +, Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Genova, Ser. 2, 7: 247. +Syntypes +: MCSN ( +2 specimens +) and BM 1947.2.12.76­77 (formerly 94.3.17.15) according to Condit, 1964, J. Ohio Herpetol. Soc., 4: 95; MCSN 29758A designated +lectotype +by Capocaccia, 1957, Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Genova, 69: 213. +Type +locality: "Colonia Resistancia, South Chaco, +Argentine Republic +". Synonymy by Cochran, 1955 "1954", Bull. +U.S. +Natl. Mus., 206: 96. + + + +Hyla goodfellowi +Procter, 1921 + +, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 9, 7: 191. +Holotype +: BM 1947.2.23.4 (formerly 1920.11.29.23) according to Condit, 1964, J. Ohio Herpetol. Soc., 4: 90. +Type +locality: "Esperanza, [Departmento de Santa Cruz] E. +Bolivia +". Synonymy with + +Hyla spegazzini + +by Parker, 1928, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 10, 2: 98. + + + + + +Hyla roeschmanni + +De +Grys, 1938 + + +, Zool. Anz., 123: 315. +Holotype +: ZMH, now destroyed, according to +Duellman, 1977 +, Das Tierreich, 95: 95; and J. Hallermann pers. comm. +Type +locality: "Provinz Beni, +Bolivien +, südliches Quellgebiet des Amazonas. +Neotype +: MNCN 42319 (field tag, JMP 1083) an adult male from Bella Vista, Province Iténez, Departamento de Beni, +Bolivia +( +13°16’S +, +63°42’W +), collected on +25 March 2003 +by José M. Padial. + + + + +Diagnosis + + +A species of the + +Hypsiboas albopunctatus + +group (sensu + +Faivovich +et al. +2005 + +) distinguished from other species in the group by the following combination of characters: maximum SVL, +70 mm +in males, +81 mm +in females ( +Lutz, 1973 +; +Cei, 1980 +); body robust; snout long, acuminate in dorsal view, rounded and protruding in profile; canthus rostralis slightly rounded in cross­section; loreal region concave; tympanic membrane and tympanic annulus distinct, round, its diameter about three­fifths eye length; supratympanic fold prominent, covering upper edge of tympanic annulus, reaching slightly behind insertion of arm; vomerine odontophores prominent, separated medially, between choanae; hind limbs long, slender; tibiotarsal articulation reaching beyond tip of snout; heels overlapping when limbs flexed perpendicular to axis of body; tarsal fold and tubercles on outer edge of tarsus absent; weak ulnar folds present; axillary membrane absent; fingers with basal webbing; toes about four­fifths webbed; well­developed, round terminal discs on fingers and toes, slightly smaller on toes; single distal subarticular tubercle under fourth finger; enlarged pollex rudiment with slightly projecting bony spine in adult males; nuptial excrescences absent in males; skin on dorsal surfaces smooth, with or without small tubercles; skin on throat tuberculate; skin on venter and ventral surfaces of thighs strongly granular; distinct transverse fold on chest; dorsal surfaces tan, pale grey or brown, with or without indistinct irregular dark transverse marks and flecks and/or small cream spots; loreal and tympanic region brown; ventral surfaces cream, sometimes with indistinct and irregular brown marbling and spotting on throat and chest; posterior flanks and hidden surfaces of thighs white to greyish­cream with bold dark brown spots or vertical bars. + + + + + +Description of +neotype + + + +An adult male; body and extremities long and slender; head slightly longer than wide. Dorsal skin and throat smooth, belly and groins areolate, flanks warty, with low elongate warts; dorsal folds absent; supratympanic fold prominent, from posterior margin of the upper eyelid to the level of the arm insertion; tympanic membrane large, conspicuous, round to slightly oval; tympanic annulus thin, almost complete, but hidden in its dorsal margin; snout round in dorsal view, round to subacuminate in lateral profile; canthus rostralis sharp, concave in dorsal view; loreal region slighlty concave; narines slightly prominent, dorsolaterally oriented; tongue more or less circular, weakly bifurcated behind, barely free posteriorly; vomerine odontophores large, transverse, between choanae, almost in contact with each other and with choanae; about ten small vomerine teeth on each odontophore; choanae large, triangular, separated by a distance twice their diameter. Thenar tubercle large, elongate, almost twice as large as palmar tubercle; palmar tubercle small, low, cordiform; supernumerary tubercles abundant (up to five on a finger), round, smaller than subarticular tubercles; subarticular tubercles round, prominent; interdigital membrane between Fingers II­III­IV basal; finger lengths 3>2>1>4; discs large, round to slightly oval; prepollical spine present; no tubercles on heel and tarsus; inner metatarsal tubercle large, low, oval; outer metatarsal tubercle almost inconspicuous; subarticular tubercles large, round; supernumerary tubercles abundant, round, small, inconspicuous; toes with interdigital membrane well developed, webbing formula, I1­ +2 +II1­ +2 +III1 1/2­ +2IV +2­ +1V +; toe discs large, round; toe lengths 4>3>5>2>1. + + + +FIGURE 1. +Ventral and dorsal view of the neotype of + +Hyla roeschmanni + +from Bellavista, Department Beni, Bolivia (MNCN 42319). + + + +Coloration in alcohol + +Dorsal surfaces dark brown with small, diffuse, irregular darker marks; flanks cream with vertical, diffuse, brown bars. Throat cream with dense dark brown mottling, chest with less mottling; belly immaculate cream; ventral surfaces of limbs cream; anterior and posterior surfaces pale brown with darker vertical bars, more contrasted on the posterior surface; ventral surfaces of hands and feet brown; tympanic membrane dark brown, supratympanic fold dark brown to black. + +Measurements (in millimeters) + +Snout­vent length, 61.4; head length (from posterior margin of the lower jaw to tip of snout), 20.6; head width (measured at level of rictus), 18.6; eye diameter, 7.4; eye­nostril distance, 5.3; internarial distance, 4.8; eye­eye distance (between anterior margins), 10.1; Finger III length, 2.4; tibia length, 33.9; foot length (from proximal border of inner metatarsal tubercle to tip of fourth toe), 26.5. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/68/87/376887DC8866CA14FC96FCCBD594F9C1.xml b/data/37/68/87/376887DC8866CA14FC96FCCBD594F9C1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e49cf9d7bd6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/68/87/376887DC8866CA14FC96FCCBD594F9C1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,195 @@ + + + +An enigmatic Tettigoniidea from the Lower Cretaceous amber of Bqaatouta, Lebanon (Orthoptera, Ensifera) + + + +Author + +AZAR, DANY + + + +Author + +MAALOUF, RAMY + + + +Author + +NEL, ANDRÉ + +text + + +Palaeoentomology + + +2022 + +2022-06-23 + + +5 + + +3 + + +233 +239 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.5.3.5 + +journal article +95355 +10.11646/palaeoentomology.5.3.5 +f21d4f9c-f0ff-408d-ab78-82ae83c7661b +2624-2834 +6820833 +313203B3-467A-4D92-A506-8784A201E569 + + + + + + + +Aenigmaraphidophora mouniri + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs 1–3 +) + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +DF023468-4A2E-45B3-8D0B- 13826D4F2F13 + + + + + +Material. + +Holotype +of + +Aenigmaraphidophora mouniri + + +gen. et sp. nov. + +(a nearly complete fossil, either a larva or a male), specimen number BKT-3A, Maalouf Collection, is stored at the Natural History Museum of the Lebanese University, + +Faculty of +Sciences + +II, Fanar, +Lebanon +. + + + + + +Etymology. +Named after Dr Mounir Maalouf, father of RM and discoverer of the amber site and studied material. + + + + +Diagnosis. +As for the genus, +vide supra +. + + + + + + +Type +locality and horizon. + +Bqaatouta amber outcrop ( +33°58′0″N +, +35°47′13″E +, elev. + +1,177 m + +), +Caza +(= District) +Kesserouan +, +Central +Lebanon +, +lower Barremian + +. + + + + +Description. +Body +2.61 mm +long (from head tip to abdomen); head +1.43 mm +long; clypeus divided into an ante- and a postclypeus; antenna with 55 segments, +8.46 mm +long; maxillary palp +2.15 mm +long; apical sensory zone of maxillary palp elongate ( +Fig. 2B +), much longer than palp apical width; thorax +0.97 mm +long, +0.92 mm +high; four tarsomeres on all legs; fore leg with tibia +0.95 mm +long, tarsus +0.4 mm +long, distal articulation zone of fore coxa displaced laterally; tympan present on fore tibia ( +Fig. 2C +); mid femur 2.53 long, with one inner and one outer relatively large movable apical spines, tibia +0.91 mm +long, tarsus +0.55 mm +long; hind femur +2.06 mm +long, with outer side without any chevron ridges, tibia +1.76 mm +long, with longest apical spur slightly shorter than first and second segments of hind tarsi combined, hind tarsi laterally compressed, 1 +st +tarsomere with one flat pulvillus, 2 +nd +and 3 +rd +tarsomeres with a widened pulvilllus; abdomen +1.25 mm +long, +1.3 mm +high; no femoro-abdominal stridulatory apparatus observable; abdominal tergites without obvious process on dorsal surface; epiproct without posterior process; cerci +0.95 mm +long, straight, bearing very long setae, but without any bulbous-like sensillae; subgenital plate with styles ( +Fig. 3C +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/68/87/376887DC8866CA17FC96FF03D49BFCA9.xml b/data/37/68/87/376887DC8866CA17FC96FF03D49BFCA9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a7bb5ae75fb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/68/87/376887DC8866CA17FC96FF03D49BFCA9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + +An enigmatic Tettigoniidea from the Lower Cretaceous amber of Bqaatouta, Lebanon (Orthoptera, Ensifera) + + + +Author + +AZAR, DANY + + + +Author + +MAALOUF, RAMY + + + +Author + +NEL, ANDRÉ + +text + + +Palaeoentomology + + +2022 + +2022-06-23 + + +5 + + +3 + + +233 +239 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.5.3.5 + +journal article +95355 +10.11646/palaeoentomology.5.3.5 +f21d4f9c-f0ff-408d-ab78-82ae83c7661b +2624-2834 +6820833 +313203B3-467A-4D92-A506-8784A201E569 + + + + + +Genus + +Aenigmaraphidophora + +gen. nov. + + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +7EFAE62D-2D6E-4DB7- B2EC-F6C6579455A5 + + + + + + +Type +species. + + +Aenigmaraphidophora mouniri + + +sp. nov. + + + + + +Etymology. +Named after the Latin ‘aenigma’ for its enigmatic family position, and the genus name + +Raphidophora +, Gender + +feminine. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Very long maxillary palps, longer than fore legs; upper margin of first segment of hind tarsi without any spines; fore coxa with a lateral tubercle; mid femora with one inner and one outer relatively large movable apical spines; male subgenital plate with styles; longest apical spur of hind tibiae slightly shorter than first and second segments of hind tarsi combined; no process on dorsal surface of abdominal tergites; epiproct without process; hind 2 +nd +and 3 +rd +tarsomeres with a widened pulvillus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/69/47/3769474E8D235501B481080CD589FB23.xml b/data/37/69/47/3769474E8D235501B481080CD589FB23.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..64987413617 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/69/47/3769474E8D235501B481080CD589FB23.xml @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ + + + +Morphological investigation of genital organs and first insights into the phylogeny of the genus Siciliaria Vest, 1867 as a basis for a taxonomic revision (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Clausiliidae) + + + +Author + +De Mattia, Willy +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0056-467X +Central Research Laboratories, of Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria +willy.demattia@icgeb.org + + + +Author + +Reier, Susanne +Central Research Laboratories, of Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria + + + +Author + +Haring, Elisabeth +Central Research Laboratories, of Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2021 + +2021-12-14 + + +1077 + + +1 +175 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1077.67081 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1077.67081 +1313-2970-1077-1 +C28AD65A76F242CFBED7DFB3702CABCE +734088641608531C8E2CC69397B000ED + + + + +Stigmatica vulcanica sigridae Nordsieck, 2013 + + + + +Figs 65.7, 65.8, 66.4, 66.5 + + + +Distribution. + + +Stigmatica vulcanica sigridae + +is restricted to a small range east of Cosenza in central Calabria ( +Nordsieck 2013a +: 10). + + + +Specimens examined. + + +Italy +, +Calabria +, +Cosenza +, +Contrada Rizzuto. + +770 m +asl + +, +39°14'51.24"N +, +16°10'30.51"E +, +W. De Mattia +and +J. Macor +leg. and det., 2 dissected spm + +; + +Italy +, +Calabria + +, + +Cosenza +, +Contrada Rizzuto +road to +San Bartolo +, +Cosenza +, +Calabria + +, + +Italy +. + +740 m +asl + +, +39°15'20.65"N +, +16°11'09.16"E +, +W. De Mattia +and +J. Macor +leg. and det., 2 dissected spm + +. + + + +Figure 66. + +Stigmatica vulcanica vulcanica + +(Benoit, 1860), Belpasso, Catania +66.1 +shell. Cosenza +66.2 +shell; Paola +66.3 +shell. + +Stigmatica vulcanica sigridae + +Nordsieck, 2013, Mendicino, Cosenza +66.4-66.5 +shells. + + + + +External morphology of the genital organs + + +(Fig. +65 +.9). + +The V as long as the FO. The FDBC is 1.5 +x +longer than the SDBC+BC. The BC+SDBC is club-like in shape, with a clear distinction between the SDBC and the BC. The D is much longer than the SDBC+BC and remarkably thinner. The V is wide in diameter. The PC is ~ 2.5 +x +longer than the V. The P is cylindrical and slightly swollen. The transition between P and EP is clearly visible with a strong ET. The PR is short and robust. The E is longer than the P but thinner in diameter. + + + +Internal morphology of the genital organs + + +(Fig. +65 +.10). + +The V shows a weak longitudinal sculpturing. The P shows 6 to 8 smooth longitudinal pleats that fade as entering into the A. The pseudopapilla is smooth and short. It originates from the ER which is connected to the ELP by means of three or four smooth longitudinal pleats. The two ELP are slightly fringed and fade before entering the VD. The epiphallar formula is PP(ER)+ELP. + + + +Remarks. + + +Stigmatica vulcanica sigridae + +was described based on shell characters that slightly differ from the nominate subspecies ( +Nordsieck 2013a +: 10). Its anatomy of the genital organs, except for the smooth (instead of fringed) longitudinal penial pleats, matches with the nominate subspecies populations from Calabria but nevertheless keeps reliable differences with the Sicilian samples. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/69/87/376987F9FB0EFFDAFCCE03D8FB81EE0B.xml b/data/37/69/87/376987F9FB0EFFDAFCCE03D8FB81EE0B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c7dbe5582f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/69/87/376987F9FB0EFFDAFCCE03D8FB81EE0B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,205 @@ + + + +Novos Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) da coleção Odette Morvan, Kaw, Guiana Francesa. IV + + + +Author + +Galileo, Maria Helena M. +Museu de Ciências Naturais, Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul. Caixa Postal 1.188, 90001 - 970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. +galileo@fzb.rs.gov.br + + + +Author + +Martins, Ubirajara R. +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 42.494, 04218 - 970, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. +urmsouza@usp.br + +text + + +Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia + + +2009 + +2009-12-31 + + +49 + + +12 + + +145 +149 + + + +journal article +10.1590/S0031-10492009001200001 +1807-0205 +4900933 + + + + + + + +Eburodacrys amabilis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 1 +) + + + +Etimologia: +Latim, + +amabilis + += agradável; alusivo ao seu +habitus. + +Cabeça avermelhada. Tubérculos anteníferos pretos. Genas acuminadas, muito curtas. Antenas alaranjadas atingem a ponta dos élitros no ápice do antenômero VIII (macho). Escapo nitidamente escavado na metade basal e algo alargado na base. Flagelômeros profundamente carenados. Pêlos internos do antenômero III pouco mais longos que a largura do artículo. +Protórax avermelhado com áreas pretas: tubérculos dorsais e áreas circundantes; espinhos laterais e áreas prolongadas para diante e para trás. Tubérculos pronotais e espinhos laterais do protórax mais longos que o pedicelo. Disco pronotal com rugas irregulares, menos em área lisa, central, situada pouco atrás dos tubérculos. Mesosterno sem tubérculos. +Élitros avermelhados na metade basal e mais alaranjados na metade apical. Cada um com três manchas ebúrneas: uma na base, grande e arredondada; duas pós-medianas, largas, a externa inicia-se pouco atrás da interna, ligeiramente emarginada na borda anterior e ultrapassa posteriormente a interna; as duas manchas em conjunto aproximam-se da sutura e da margem lateral. Áreas pretas: região posterior das manchas ebúrneas basais; largamente nas regiões anterior e posterior das manchas ebúrneas centrais; espinhos apicais e faixa oblíqua no ápice. Pontuação dos élitros grossa na metade basal e ausente na metade apical. +Face ventral do corpo avermelhada menos a base do primeiro urosternito, preta. Meso- e metafêmures longos com ápice e espinhos pretos; metafêmures alcançam a ponta dos élitros. + +Dimensões, mm, holótipo macho: +Comprimento total, 16,5; comprimento do protórax 3,6; maior largura do protórax, 4,3; comprimento do élitro, 11,5; largura umeral, 4,3. + + +Material-tipo: + +Holótipo macho, +GUIANA +FRAN- +CESA + +, Kaw (km 40), + +17.VI +.2005 + +, +O. Morvan +col., armadilha +de Malaise +(MZUSP). + + +Material adicional (no MNHN): + +GUIANA +FRAN- +CESA +, +Kaw +(km 46, troçon 3), macho, + +4.X.1986 + +, +F. & J.-P. Serais +col., armadilha luminosa; +Montagne de la Trinité +, macho, + +30.X.1991 + +, +J.-J. Briswalter +col., armadilha luminosa; +Piste de Saint-Elie +(tronçon 1 = CD 21, km 15), fêmea, +27. + + +VII +.1996, +C. Brunot +col., atraído pela luz; +Saül +( +Eaux Claires +), macho, +31. + +V.1996, +A. Berkov +col., sob tronco em decomposição; 2 fêmeas, + +22. + +VI +.1996 + + +e + +6.VIII.1996 + +, +A. Berkov +col., sob tronco em decomposição. + + + +Discussão: +Eburodacrys amabilis + +sp. nov. +pertence ao grupo de espécies com tubérculos dorsais do pronoto e espinhos laterais do protórax mais longos que o pedicelo, escapo subgloboso, largo na base e com sulco basal manifesto. Este grupo envolve + +E. sulfurifera +Gounelle, 1909 + +, + +E. quadridens +(Fabricius, 1801) + +e + +E. megaspilota +White, 1853 + +. + +Eburodacrys amabilis + +sp. nov. +separa-se de todas pelo padrão de colorido dos élitros. + +E. sulfurifera + +é a única espécie dentre as mencionadas, em que a mancha ebúrnea pós-mediana externa não ultrapassa a pós-mediana interna, como em + +E. amabilis +. + +Difere de + +E. sulfurifera + +pela presença de faixa preta anteapical nos élitros e pela mancha ebúrnea central-externa com entalhe. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/69/87/376987F9FB0FFFD8FCB906F7FF7EE834.xml b/data/37/69/87/376987F9FB0FFFD8FCB906F7FF7EE834.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1bc743b4786 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/69/87/376987F9FB0FFFD8FCB906F7FF7EE834.xml @@ -0,0 +1,209 @@ + + + +Novos Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) da coleção Odette Morvan, Kaw, Guiana Francesa. IV + + + +Author + +Galileo, Maria Helena M. +Museu de Ciências Naturais, Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul. Caixa Postal 1.188, 90001 - 970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. +galileo@fzb.rs.gov.br + + + +Author + +Martins, Ubirajara R. +Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 42.494, 04218 - 970, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. +urmsouza@usp.br + +text + + +Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia + + +2009 + +2009-12-31 + + +49 + + +12 + + +145 +149 + + + +journal article +10.1590/S0031-10492009001200001 +1807-0205 +4900933 + + + + + + + +Stizocera kawensis + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 2 +) + + + +Etimologia: +Epíteto alusivo à localidade-tipo. + +Cabeça preta. Fronte com pontos pequenos. Lobos oculares superiores com cinco fileiras de omatídios. Vértice com pontos esparsos rasos. Antenas pretas atingem o ápice dos élitros aproximadamente na extremidade do antenômero VIII. Escapo esparsamente pontuado. Espinho do antenômero III tão longo quanto a metade do comprimento do antenômero IV. Antenômeros IV e V com espinho longo; espinho menor no antenômero VI e diminuto no VII. +Protórax avermelhado. Pronoto com pontos esparsos, mais concentrados no disco. Partes laterais do protórax e prosterno com pontuação sexual constituída por pontos grandes e próximos. Mesosterno sem tubérculo. Metasterno alaranjado. Escutelo avermelhado. +Élitros alaranjados com o quarto apical preto; pêlos alaranjados longos e esparsos; pontuação da metade basal densa com alguns pontos ásperos (30X). Ápice dos élitros cortados em curva com espinho externo e espículo no ângulo sutural. +Fêmures pretos. Extremidades dos mesofêmures e metafêmures com espinhos externos mais longos do que os internos. Tíbias e tarsos pretos. +Urosternitos I a III alaranjados. Urosternito IV e V acastanhados. + +Dimensões, mm, holótipo macho: +Comprimento total, 8,6; comprimento do protórax, 1,8; maior largura do protórax, 1,6; comprimento do élitro, 5,7; largura umeral, 2,0. + + +Material-tipo: + +Holótipo macho, +GUIANA +FRAN- +CESA + +, + +Kaw +(km 43), + +12.XII.1991 + +, +J. A. Cerda +col., armadilha luminosa ( +MZUSP +) + +. + + +Material adicional (no MNHN): +GUIANA +FRAN- CESA, Risquetout (Piste Forestière de Saut Léoda- + + + +FIGURAS 1‑3: 1, + +Eburodacrys amabilis + +sp. nov. +, holótipo macho, comprimento, 16,5 mm; +2, + +Stizocera kawensis + +sp. nov. +, holótipo macho, comprimento, 8,6 mm; +3, + +Estola cerdai + +sp. nov. +, holótipo macho, comprimento, 9,4 mm. + + + +te, km 3), macho, fêmea, +30.XII.1991 +, M. Hudson col., armadilha luminosa; Kaw (Piste km 33), fêmea, +21.XI.1982 +, G. Tavakilian col., armadilha luminosa; macho, +11.XII.1982 +, G. Tavakilian col., armadilha luminosa; macho, +11.XI.1983 +, D. Dauthuille col., armadilha luminosa; fêmea, +6.XII.1988 +, A. Juriens col., armadilha luminosa; (Piste km 40), fêmea, +3.XII.1983 +, G. Tavakilian col., armadilha luminosa; fêmea, +17.II.1985 +, M. Duranton col., armadilha luminosa; fêmea, +4.I.1986 +, P. Sarry col., armadilha luminosa; macho, +2.I.1989 +, O. Baloup col., armadilha luminosa; macho, +9.XII.1991 +, F. Beneluz col., armadilha luminosa; 2 fêmeas, +10.XII.1991 +, J.-A. Cerda col., armadilha luminosa; fêmea, +1.II.1992 +, P. Czachor col., armadilha luminosa; 3 fêmeas, +7.II.1994 +, G. Silvestre col., armadilha luminosa; 2 fêmeas, +8.II.1994 +, I. Gonzalofidel col., armadilha luminosa; (Piste km 48), macho, +10.I.2000 +, J.-L. Giuglaris col., armadilha luminosa; Piste des Compagnons Réunis (km 8), fêmea, +15.I.1988 +, D. Camus col., armadilha luminosa; (km 16), fêmea, +29.XII.1983 +, M. Duranton col., armadilha luminosa; (km 27), macho, 3 fêmeas, +11.XII.1987 +, M. Duranton col., armadilha luminosa; Piste de Saint-Elie (km 12), macho, +26.XII.1992 +, J.-A. Cerda col., armadilha luminosa; (km 43), fêmea, +15.XI.1979 +, R. Barnouin col., armadilha luminosa; Piste du Plateau des Mines (km 1,3), macho, +11.XII.1993 +, A. Docquin & L. Sénécaux, col., armadilha luminosa; col., armadilha luminosa; Piste du plateau de Nancibo (km 7), fêmea, +14.XII.1985 +, M. Thouvenot col., armadilha luminosa; Piste Coralie (km 8), macho, +24.I.1987 +, R. Larré col., armadilha luminosa; macho, +18.I.1988 +, F. & J.-P. Serais col., armadilha luminosa; Piste Changement (km 6), fêmea, +9.XII.1991 +, L. Sénécaux col., armadilha luminosa; fêmea, +8.II.1992 +, M. Duranton col., armadilha luminosa. + + + +Discussão (comparação entre machos): +Stizocera kawensis + +sp. nov. +tem padrão de colorido semelhante ao de + +S. ichilo +Lingafelter, 2004 + +, conhecida da +Bolívia +. Distingue-se pelos fêmures não avermelhados na base; pelas antenas mais longas, atingem o ápice dos élitros na extremidade do antenômero VIII; pelos espinhos no ápice dos antenômeros III a VII; pelo protórax com lados subparalelos e pela pontuação sexual restrita aos lados do pronoto. Em + +S. ichilo + +os fêmures são avermelhados na base; as antenas atingem o ápice dos élitros na extremidade do antenômero X; apenas os antenômeros III a V possuem espinho no ápice; os lados do protórax são arredondados e as áreas de pontuação sexual quase se encontram na parte anterior do pronoto. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFA1FF8FD1CDF9884585FDBA.xml b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFA1FF8FD1CDF9884585FDBA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..427f4c21d64 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFA1FF8FD1CDF9884585FDBA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,844 @@ + + + +Identity of the tree-spider crab, Parasesarma leptosoma (Hilgendorf, 1869) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae), with descriptions of seven new species from the Western Pacific + + + +Author + +Li, Jheng-Jhang + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + + + +Author + +Ng, Peter K. L. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-09-19 + + +4482 + + +3 + + +451 +490 + + + +journal article +29418 +10.11646/zootaxa.4482.3.2 +fd24ef18-76ac-46f1-aec2-2faf5b0ff325 +1175-5326 +1440707 +3FBE11E2-9F97-4A29-92A9-67780C782E0D + + + + + + + +Parasesarma limbense +(Rathbun, 1914) + + + + + +( + +Figs. +2I +–N + +, +3 +) + + + + + +Sesarma +( +Holometopus +) +limbense +Rathbun, 1914: 79 + +. + + + +Sesarma +( +Holometopus +) +limbensis +, Tesch 1917: 169 + +(list), 237 (key). + + + + + +Material examined. +LECTOTYPE +: male (7.1× +6.8 mm +) ( +USNM 45920 +) (here designated), +Indonesia +: +North Sulawesi +: +Lembeh Island +, + +12 November 1909 + + +. + +PARALECTOTYPES +: +2 females +(13.1× +11.6 mm +, 12.6× +11.4 mm +) ( + +USNM +120523 + +), same data as lectotype + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Carapace ( +Figs. 3A, H, I +) squarish in general outline, 1.1 times broader than long; regions well defined, separated by shallow grooves; postfrontal region distinct, separated into 4 lobes by shallow grooves; frontal margin nearly straight; lateral margin straight, subparallel most of length before curving to join almost straight posterior carapace margin; cornea reaching tip of external orbital tooth ( +Figs. 3A, H, I +). Ischium of third maxilliped with shallow median sulcus, merus with distinct submedian ridge; exopod slender, tip reaching halflength of outer margin of merus, flagellum long ( +Fig. 2N +). Male cheliped palm with 2 transverse pectinate crests (c. 10–18 corneous teeth, distal and proximal crests, respectively) on upper surface; upper surface of dactylus with 9 symmetrical, obliquely elongate dactylar tubercles, proximal 3 tubercles large, tubercles 4–7 small, smaller distally, distalmost tubercle indistinct ( +Figs. 3D, E +). Ambulatory legs relatively slender for this species-complex, P3 and P4 about 1.8 times carapace width; P3 and P4 coxae without dense setae; P3 merus 2.6 times as long as broad; P3 propodus 4.4 times as long as broad; P3 dactylus 0.4 times length of propodus ( +Fig. 3G +). G1 relatively stout; apical process corneous, relatively short, slightly bent at angle of 60°, ending in truncated tip ( + +Figs. +2I +–M + +). G2 condition not known. + + + +FIGURE 3 +. + +Parasesarma limbense +(Rathbun, 1914) + +. A–G, lectotype male (7.1×6.8 mm) (USNM 45920), Lembeh Island, Sulawesi; H, paralectotype female (13.1×11.6 mm) (USNM 120523-1), same locality; I, paralectotype female (12.6×11.4 mm) (USNM 120523-2), same locality. A, H, I, dorsal views; B, ventral view; C, mouth part; D, E, left cheliped; F, frontal views; G, right third and fourth legs. D, outer view of palm; E, dorsal view of dactylar finger. + + + + +TABLE 1. +Comparison of major differences between members of the + +Parasesarma leptosoma + +species +- +complex. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+P. + +P. + +P. + +P. + +P. + +P. + +P. + +P. + +P. +
+ +leptosoma + + + +limbense + + + +gecko + + + +macaco + + + +kui + + + +gracilipes + + + +purpureum + + + +parvulum + + + +tarantula + +
Carapace general shapeTrapezoidalSquarishSquarishSquarishSquarishSquarishSquarish butSquarishSquarish but
(cw./cl. ratio)(mean 1.06,(mean 1.09,(mean 1.13,(mean 1.12,(mean 1.11,(mean 1.13,relatively(mean 1.14,relatively
SD ± 0.12, nSD ± 0.06, nSD ± 0.03, nSD ± 0.02, nSD ± 0.02,SD ± 0.03, nwideSD ± 0.05, nwide
= 4)= 3)= 17)= 8)n = 10)= 5)(mean 1.20,= 10)(mean 1.17,
(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig. 7A)(e.g. Fig. 9A)(e.g. Fig.SD ± 0.00, n(e.g. Fig.SD ± 0.03, n
1A)3A)4A)11A)= 23)15A)= 6)
(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.
13A)17A)
Carapace granulation on frontalFinelyFinelyFinelyCoarselyFinelyFinelyFinelyFinelyFinely
regiongranulargranulargranulargranulargranulargranulargranulargranulargranular
(e.g. Fig.1C)(e.g. Fig. 3F)(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig. 7C)(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.
4C)9A)11C)13C)15C)17C)
Shape of frontal border in dorsalNearlyConcave inConcave inStronglyConcave inStronglyStronglyConcave inConcave in
viewstraightmedial partmedial partconcave inmedial partconcave inconcave inmedial partmedial part
(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.medial part(e.g. Fig. 9C)medial partmedial part(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.
1A)3A)4A)(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.15A)17A)
7A)11A)13A)
Granulation on outer surfaceRelativelyRelativelyRelativelyRelativelyRelativelyRelativelyRelativelyRelativelyRelatively
of palmrobustminuterobust (Fig.robust (Fig.minute (Fig.minute (Fig.robust (Fig.robust (Fig.robust
(Fig. 19A)(Fig. 3D)19B)19C)19D)19E)19F)19G)(Fig. 19H)
Male pectinated crests on palm222 or 322 or 32222
(Fig. 2C)(Fig. 3E)(most 2)(Fig. 8C)(most 2)(Fig. 12C)(Fig. 14C)(Fig. 16C)(Fig. 18C)
(Fig. 5C)(Fig. 10C)
Male dactylar tubercles7910–156–89–127 or 891011
(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(average 11)(average 7)(average 10)(average 8)(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.
19A)3D)(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.19F)19G)19H)
19B)19C)19D)19E)
+ + +……continued on the next page + + + + +TABLE 1. +(Continued) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+P. + +P. + +P. + +P. + +P. + +P. + +P. + +P. + +P. +
+leptosome + + +limbense + + + +gecko + + + +macaco + + + +kui + + + +gracilipes + + + +purpureum + + + +parvulum + + + +tarantula + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Dorsal margin of ambulatoryStraightStraightStraightUpturnedStraightStraight toStraight toStraight toStraight
merus(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.distally(e.g. Fig.slightlyslightlyslightly(e.g. Fig.
1E)3G)2 0A)(e.g. Fig.2 0C)upturnedupturnedupturned2 0G)
2 0B)distallydistallydistally
(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.(e.g. Fig.
20D)20E)20F)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Dactylus of P3 Short Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Short Moderate Moderate Moderate (dactylus/propodi length ratio) (0.31, SD (mean 0.41, (mean 0.38, (mean 0.35, (mean 0.37, (mean 0.27, (mean 0.39, (mean 0.42, (mean 0.48, ±0.02, n = 4) SD ± 0.05, n SD ± 0.06, n SD ± 0.03, n SD ± 0.14, n SD ± 0.07, n SD ± 0.02, n SD ± 0.07, n SD ± 0.04, n = 2) = 12) = 8) = 10) = 5) = 9) = 9) = 6) G1 apical process Short Short Elongated Elongated Short Elongated Short Short Elongated (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. 2E) 2M) 5D) 8E) 10E) 12E) 14E) 16E) 18E) G1 shaft Nearly Slightly bent Slightly bent Nearly Nearly Nearly Nearly Nearly Nearly straight, outward, outward, straight, straight, straight, straight, straight, straight, slender stout slender slender stout slender stout stout stout (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. 2I) (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. (e.g. Fig. 21A) 21B) 21C) 21D) 21E) 21F) 21G) 21H) Distribution South and Sulawesi, Japan, Taiwan and Taiwan Papua, Malaysia Philippines Sulawesi, East Africa Indonesia Guam, Fiji Philippines Indonesia Indonesia and Vanuatu +
Merus of P3Very broadBroadBroadBroadBroadSlenderBroadBroadVery broad
(length/width ratio)(mean 2.40,(mean 2.60,(mean 2.48,(mean 2.52,(mean 2.58,(mean 3.05,(mean 2.56,(mean 2.50,(mean 2.34,
SD ± 0.26, nSD ± 0.04, nSD ± 0.11, nSD ± 0.20, nSD ± 0.14, nSD ± 0.61, nSD ± 0.16, nSD ± 0.20, nSD ± 0.19, n
= 4)= 2)= 12)= 8)= 10)= 5)= 9)= 9)= 6)
Proodi of P3BroadBroadBroadBroadBroadSlenderSlenderBroadVery broad
(length/width ratio)(mean 4.13,(mean 4.38,(mean 4.83,(mean 4.99,(mean 4.35,(mean 5.87,(mean 5.65,(mean 4.84,(mean 3.87,
SD ±0.48, nSD ± 0.49, nSD ± 0.40, nSD ± 0.26, nSD ± 0.26, nSD ± 0.75, nSD ± 0.72, nSD ± 0.30, nSD ± 0.37, n
= 4)= 2)= 12)= 8)= 10)= 5)= 9)= 9)= 6)
+ + + + + +Colour in life. +Not known. + + + + +Remarks. + +Parasesarma limbense + +was originally described on the basis of one male and two female specimens (including one ovigerous) from Limbe (= Lembeh Island), +Sulawesi +, +Indonesia +. It has been regarded as a junior synonym of + +P. leptosoma + +by Serène (1968) without comment, and this was followed by Ng +et al +. (2008). Rahayu & Ng (2009) questioned the synonymy but did not resolve the matter. We have examined the three +type +specimens of + +P. limbense + +in the USNM and confirmed that the taxon is specifically distinct from + +P. leptosoma + +. The most noticeable difference is seen in the shape of the carapace, which is squarish ( +Figs. 3A, H, I +), and the form of G1, which is relatively slender with a truncate tip in + +P. limbense + +( + +Figs. +2I +–M + +). In + +P. leptosoma + +, by contrast, the carapace is trapezoidal with posteriorly converging lateral margins ( +Figs. 1A, E, G +, +2A +), and the G1 is relatively stout with a rounded tip ( +Figs. 2E–H +). Other characters that distinguish this species from other closely related congeners are given in +Table 1 +. + + +Di +s +tribution. +So far known only from Lembeh Island, northern +Sulawesi +(Rathbun 1914). + + + + +Ecology. +Not known. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFA5FF83D1CDFA8F41A4F9F6.xml b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFA5FF83D1CDFA8F41A4F9F6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8d0660f2e7c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFA5FF83D1CDFA8F41A4F9F6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,745 @@ + + + +Identity of the tree-spider crab, Parasesarma leptosoma (Hilgendorf, 1869) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae), with descriptions of seven new species from the Western Pacific + + + +Author + +Li, Jheng-Jhang + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + + + +Author + +Ng, Peter K. L. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-09-19 + + +4482 + + +3 + + +451 +490 + + + +journal article +29418 +10.11646/zootaxa.4482.3.2 +fd24ef18-76ac-46f1-aec2-2faf5b0ff325 +1175-5326 +1440707 +3FBE11E2-9F97-4A29-92A9-67780C782E0D + + + + + + + +Parasesarma leptosoma +( +Hilgendorf, 1869 +) + + + + + +( +Figs. 1 +, +2A–H +, +19A +, +21A +, +24A +) + + + + + + +Sesarma leptosoma + +Hilgendorf 1869 +: 91 + + +, pl. 6, fig. 1.— + +De Man 1887 +: 645 + +.—Pfeffer 1889: 31.—Vannini & Ruwa 1994: 271.— + + +Cannicci +et al +. 1996a + +: 795 + +.— + + +Cannicci +et al +. 1996b + +: 299 + +.— + + +Vannini +et al +. 1997a + +: 325 + +, tabs. 1, 3.— + + +Vannini +et al +. 1997b + +: 101 + +.— + + +Dahdouh-Guebas +et al +. 1999 + +: 291 + +.— + + +Cannicci +et al +. 2002 + +: 77 + +. + + + + + +Sesarma +( +Parasesarma +) +leptosoma +, Tesch 1917: 169 + +(list), 253 (key).— + +Guinot 1967 +: 288 + +(list). + + + + + +Sesarma +( +Holometopus +) + +sp., + +Crosnier 1965 +: 58 + +, fig. 89. + + + + + +Parasesarma leptosomum +, + +Hartnoll 1975 +: 318 + + +, tabs. 1–3. + + + + + +Parasesarma leptosoma +, + + +Emmerson +et al +. 2003 + +: 351 + + +.— + + +Fratini +et al +. 2005 + +: 219 + +.— + +Emmerson & Ndenze 2007 +: 13 + +.—Ng +et al +. 2008: 222 (list).—Rahayu & Ng 2009: 30, 33.— + + +Koller +et al +. 2010 + +: 359 + +, 365.— + + +Bouchard +et al +. 2013 + +: 22 + +, +Fig. 17 +.— + +Emmerson 2016 +: 263 + +. + + + + + + +Material examined. +HOLOTYPE +: female (17.5×16.0 mm) ( +ZMB +No. +3 181), +East Africa +: +Tanzania + +: + + +Zanzibar + +, no date, v. d. Deckon. Other material: +2 males +(17.2×16.0 mm, 16.1× +14.8 mm +) + +, + +1 female +(16.4× +14.7 mm +) ( +ZRC 2017.163 +), mangrove creek, +Mngazana +, + +eastern +Cape Province + +, +South Africa +, + +9–10 March 2017 + +, +S. Cannicci. + +— + +1 male +(12.0× +13.6 mm +) ( +MNHN +B32081), +East Africa +: +Mayotte +Island: +Malamani +mangrove, + +2 November 2009 + +, +J.M. Bouchard +, +J. Dumas +, V. +Dinhut. + +— + +1 male +(16.0× +14.8 mm +), 1 ovigerous female (14.9× +12.7 mm +) ( +ZRC 2000.1718 +), +East Africa +: +Kenya +: +Mida creek +, + +October 1990 + +, +M. Vannini. + + + + + +FIGURE 1 +. + +Parasesarma leptosoma +(Hilgendorf, 1869) + +. A–C, holotype female (17.5×16.0 mm) (ZMB 3181), Tanzania; D–F, male (16.0×14.8 mm) (ZRC 2000.1718), Kenya; G, H, female (14.9×12.7 mm) (ZRC 2000.1718), Kenya. A, E, G, dorsal views; B, F, H, ventral views; C, D, frontal views. + + + + +FIGURE 2 +. A–H, + +Parasesarma leptosoma +(Hilgendorf, 1869) + +, male (17.5×16.0 mm) (ZRC 2000.1718), Kenya; I–N, + +P. limbense +(Rathbun, 1914) + +, lectotype male (7.1×6.8 mm) (USNM 45920), Lembeh Island, Sulawesi. A, dorsal view of carapace; B–D, tip of left cheliped; E–M, left G1; N, left third maxilliped (setae denuded). B, lateral view of pectinated cristae on palm; C, dorsal view of palm and dactylar finger; D, lateral view of dactylar finger; E, G, I, dorsal (sternal) view; F, H, J, M, ventral (pleonal) view; K, sub-ventral (pleonal) view; L, side view; E, F, L, M, distal part of G1. Scale bars: 1.0 mm. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Carapace ( +Figs. 1A, E, G +, +2A +) trapezoidal; regions well defined, separated by shallow grooves; postfrontal region distinct, separated into 4 lobes by shallow but distinct grooves; front deflexed downwards, margin nearly straight in dorsal view ( +Figs. 1C, D +, +2A +); lateral margin straight, distinctly converging towards posterior carapace margin; cornea reaching tip of external orbital tooth +( +Figs. 1A, E, G +, +2A +). Ischium of third maxilliped with shallow median sulcus, merus with distinct submedian ridge; exopod slender, tip reaching halflength of outer margin of merus, flagellum long. Male cheliped palm with 2 transverse pectinate crests (14 and 9 corneous teeth, respectively) ( +Fig. 2B +) on upper surface; upper surface of dactylus with 7 asymmetrical dactylar tubercles, proximal 3 tubercles large, tubercles 4–6 smaller, distalmost tubercle indistinct ( +Figs. 2C, D +, +19A +). Ambulatory legs ( +Figs. 1E, G +) proportionately stout, P3 and P4 about 1.8 times carapace width; P3 and P4 coxae without dense setae; P3 merus 2.4 times as long as broad; P3 propodus 4.1 times as long as broad; P3 dactylus 0.3 times length of propodus ( +Figs. 1E, G +). G1 straight, relatively slender ( +Figs. 2E–H +, +21A +); apical process bent to form an angle of 45°, corneous part short, ending in rounded tip; setae long, simple, originating at base of apical process. G2 longer than quarter length of G1 ( +Fig. 21A +). + + + + +Description +. Carapace ( +Figs. 1A, E, G +, +2A +) trapezoidal, 1.1 times broader than long; regions well defined, separated by shallow grooves; dorsolateral carapace surface lined with strong oblique striae; surface smooth. Postfrontal region distinct, separated into 4 lobes by shallow but distinct grooves; median lobes approximately same width as lateral lobes. Front ( +Figs. 1C, D +, +2A +) deflexed downwards, margin nearly straight in dorsal view. Supraorbital margin gently convex, entire. External orbital tooth triangular, directed obliquely outwards, representing point of greatest width; contiguous with entire lateral carapace margin; antero- and posterolateral margins not demarcated, without trace of tooth or indentation, lateral margin straight, distinctly converging posteriorly. Cornea reaching edge of external orbital tooth ( +Figs. 1A, E, G +, +2A +). Antennal and antennular basal segments adjacent, not separated by septum; basal antennular segment swollen. Antennal flagellum relatively long, entering orbit. Ischium of third maxilliped with shallow median sulcus, merus with distinct submedian ridge; exopod slender, tip reaching half-length of outer margin of merus, flagellum long. + + +Chelipeds ( +Figs. 1E +, +2B–D +, +19A +) relatively large, robust in adult males. Merus with carinate outer margin, without subdistal spine; inner margin with minute tubercles ending in large subdistal protuberance; outer surface with dorsal striation, ventrally tuberculate. Carpus with inner angle not produced. Upper surface of palm with 2 transverse pectinate crests. Distal crest composed of 14 high corneous teeth; second crest well developed, shorter than first crest, with 9 broader corneous teeth; crests followed by several blunt tubercles; rows of small tubercles below second crest. Outer and inner surfaces of palm with numerous granules. Fixed finger rounded, smooth on outer surface; inner surface with median ridge, moderately long. Cutting edge of fixed finger, dactylus with rounded teeth. Dorsal surface of dactylus with 7 asymmetrical tubercles, short, gradually sloping distally. First 3 tubercles large, tubercles 4–6 smaller, tubercle 7 almost indiscernible. Fingers with chitinous tips, proximal gap distinct when fingers closed. + + +Ambulatory legs ( +Figs. 1E, G +) long, stout, laterally flattened; P3, P4 subequal, longer than others, about 1.8 times carapace width; P3, P4 coxa without dense setae. Merus of P3 2.4 times as long as broad; upper margin of merus with acute subdistal spine. Meri of P2–P5 each with transverse striae on upper surface. Carpi of P2–P5 each with 2 accessory carinae on outer surface. Propodus of P3 4.1 times as long as broad with accessory carina on inferior proximal portion of outer surface, dorsal and ventral margins with short stiff setae. Dactylus 0.3 times length of propodus, tip slightly recurved, terminating in acute calcareous tip, dorsal and ventral margins with short stiff setae. + + +Thoracic sternites 1–3 completely fused. Male pleon ( +Figs. 1B, F +) relatively broad, all somites free. Telson semicircular, evenly rounded, as long as preceding somite; somite 6 almost twice as long as wide, lateral margins slightly convex. Somites 3–5 more trapezoidal, lateral margins of somites 4, 5 straight, lateral margins of somite 3 strongly convex, somites 1, 2 very narrow longitudinally. + + +G1 straight, relatively slender ( +Figs. 2E–H +, +21A +); apical process slightly bent to form an angle of 45°, produced, corneous part short, ending in rounded tip; setae long, simple, originating at base of apical process. G2 greater than quarter length of G1 ( +Fig. 21A +). + + +Female ( +Figs. 1A–C, G, H +) with relatively smaller chelipeds, pectinate crest on palms indistinct, dactylar tubercles low. Female pleon broad, telson semicircular. Vulva on anterior edge of sternite 5. + + +Colour in life. +Carapace brown, mottled with darker and lighter blotches, chelipeds reddish brown ( +Fig. 24A +). + + + + +Remarks +. + +Parasesarma leptosoma + +was originally described by +Hilgendorf (1869) +(as + +Sesarma + +) based on a female specimen from +Mozambique +(ZMB 3181). The +holotype +examined ( +Figs. 1A–C +) differs slightly from Hilgendorf’s figures (viz. pl. VI, figs. 1, 1c) in general carapace shape but this is certainly due to inaccuracies in the drawing. + + +Crosnier (1965) +listed and figured + +Sesarma +( +Holometopus +) + +sp. from +Madagascar +based on three females, and noted that the merus of P3 is 2.4 as long as broad, with the dactylus one-third the length of the propodus. The measurements ( +Table 1 +), the figure of the carapace, and the proportions of the merus and dactylus of the P3 match + +P. leptosoma + +. In ZMB there is a male specimen (17.2× +16.2 mm +, ZMB 3181) labelled as “ + +Sesarma leptosoma + +”, collected from +Madagascar +. This specimen closely resembles typical + +P. leptosoma + +in the carapace shape and proportions of the ambulatory legs, but the chela does not have any pectinate ridges and the dorsal margin of the dactylar finger is unarmed, and so cannot be a species of + +Parasesarma + +. It is here reidentified as + +Armases elegans +(Herklots, 1851) + +, a species known thus far only from the eastern Atlantic, although its superficial similarity in the body form to + +P. leptosoma + +is remarkable. + + +The most obvious character that easily distinguishes + +P. leptosoma + +from the other members in the speciescomplex is the shape of the carapace and proportions of the ambulatory legs. The lateral-margin of the carapace is distinctly convergent posteriorly and the frontal margin is almost straight, which contribute to the distinctly trapezoidal shape of carapace ( +Figs. 1A, E, G +, +2A +). Furthermore, the ambulatory legs of + +P. leptosoma + +( +Figs. 1E, G +) are proportionately the broadest among members of this complex. + + +Questionable records. +Old records of + +P. leptosoma + +sensu lato +pose problems as they often do not provide good figures and/or enough characters to enable a verification of their specific identities. +De Man (1895) +listed eight species of + +Parasesarma + +(including + +P. leptosoma + +) from the Java Sea and nearby locations, +Malaka +(= Peninsular +Malaysia +), Borneo and Celebes (= Sulawesi), but all were only briefly described in the key. +De Man (1895 +: 182) wrote about his + +P. leptosoma + +: “Dactylopoditen der Lauffüsse ausserordentlich kurz, ein Drittel der Propodusten messend” (= the ambulatory dactylus is short, being only about a third of the length of the propodus). Such features suggest that De Man’s species is probably a member of the + +P. leptosoma + +species-complex. + + + + +Distribution. +South +and East Africa: +Somalia +, +Kenya +, +Mozambique +, +Tanzania +( +Hilgendorf 1869 +; +Hartnoll 1975 +; +De Man 1887 +; Pfeffer 1889; Vannini & Ruwa 1994; + +Cannicci +et al +. 1996a + +, +b +, +2002 +; + +Emmerson +et al +. 2003 + +; + +Fratini +et al +. 2005 + +; +Emmerson 2016 +), +Mayotte +( + +Bouchard +et al +. 2013 + +) and +Madagascar +( +Crosnier 1965 +; +Guinot 1967 +). + + + + +Ecology. + +Parasesarma leptosoma + +is known to be one of the exclusively arboreal crabs ( + +Vannini +et al +. 1997b + +) and was referred as possessing the highest tree-climbing degree, i.e. a “TC (tree-canopy) species” as defined by + +Fratini +et al +. (2005) + +. Ng +et al +. (2015) noted that these crabs could be regarded as obligate tree-dwelling or arboreal taxa. The behavior of + +P. leptosoma + +s. str. +is well-documented. The species is found above the supratidal zone and lives exclusively on two mangrove trees, + +Rhizophora mucronata +Lam. + +and + +Bruguiera gymnorrhiza + +(L.) Lam. ( + +Emmerson +et al +. 2003 + +; +Emmerson & Ndenze 2007 +), but few were found in the + +Ceriops + +zone of creek mangrove ( +Hartnoll, 1975 +). The species was recorded climbing the entire tree to feed on fresh leaves (Vannini & Ruwa 1994; + +Cannicci +et al +. 1996a + +, +b +; + +Dahdouh-Guebas +et al +. 1999 + +; + +Fratini +et al +. 2005 + +; +Emmerson 2016 +), with some vertical migrations (Vannini +et al +. 1995), and has been observed to possess homing behavior ( + +Cannicci +et al +. 1997 + +). Apart from the breeding period, the species rarely ventured onto the mudflat nor into the water. It always kept itself above the water level on the tree trunk or aerial root ( + +Vannini +et al +. 1997a + +). It has been observed to perform wellsynchronized mass migrations to and from the tree canopy twice a day (Cannicci +et al +. 1996; + +Vannini +et al +. 1997a + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFA9FF89D1CDFC534107FE9A.xml b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFA9FF89D1CDFC534107FE9A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..63871577099 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFA9FF89D1CDFC534107FE9A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,508 @@ + + + +Identity of the tree-spider crab, Parasesarma leptosoma (Hilgendorf, 1869) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae), with descriptions of seven new species from the Western Pacific + + + +Author + +Li, Jheng-Jhang + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + + + +Author + +Ng, Peter K. L. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-09-19 + + +4482 + + +3 + + +451 +490 + + + +journal article +29418 +10.11646/zootaxa.4482.3.2 +fd24ef18-76ac-46f1-aec2-2faf5b0ff325 +1175-5326 +1440707 +3FBE11E2-9F97-4A29-92A9-67780C782E0D + + + + + + + +Parasesarma macaco + +n. sp. + + + + +( +Figs. 7 +, +8 +, +19C +, +20B +, +21C +, +22B +, +23B +, +24C +, +25B–D +) + + + + + + +Material +examined. + +HOLOTYPE +: male (13.8× +12.3 mm +) (NMNS-7779-005), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: mouth of +Paoli River +, north bank ( + +on + +Clerodendrum inerme + + +(L.) +Gaertn. +), + +29 September 2015 + +, J.- +J. Li + +. + +PARATYPES +: +1 male +(12.3× +11.8 mm +) ( +ZRC 2018.0788 +), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: mouth of +Paoli River +, + +5 July 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 male +(11.6×10.0 mm) ( +ZRC 2018.0789 +), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: mouth of +Paoli River +, + +30 September 2015 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 male +(15.2× +13.4 mm +) (NMNS-7779-008), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: mouth of +Paoli River +, + +6 June 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 male +(13.9× +12.5 mm +) (NMNS-7779-009), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: mouth of +Kangkou River +, + +22 June 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 male +(9.7× +8.4 mm +) (NMNS-7779-010), +Mindoro +, +Philippines +, + +5 March 2016 + +, W.- +B. Chan. + +— + +2 males +(10.1× +8.9 mm +, 12.9× +11.8 mm +) (NMNS-7779-012), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: mouth of +Paoli River +, + +19 March 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +—1 male (12.8× +11.3 mm +), + +1 female +(14.4×13.0 mm) (NMNS-7779-013), +Taiwan +: +Tainan +: +Taijiang National Park +: Sicao Mangrove Green Tunnel, South bank, + +4 October 2015 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 female +(12.7× +11.2 mm +) (NMNS-7779- 014), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: mouth of +Paoli River +, + +4 October 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 male +(12.4× +10.8 mm +) (NMNS-7779- 007), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Kenting National Park +: mouth of +Kangkou River +, + +26 September 2015 + +, J.- +J. Li. Other +material + +: 2 males (12.7× +10.8 mm +, 9.5× +10.9 mm +), + +3 females +(12.3× +10.8 mm +, 11.8×10.0 mm, 8.4× +7.5 mm +) (NMNS- 7779-020), +Philippines +: +Bohol +Island: +Loboc River +, + +18 May 2004 + +, H.- +C. Liu. + +— + +1 male +(9.9×8.4) (NMNS-7779- 011), +Philippines +: +Mindoro +, + +5 March 2016 + +, W.- +B. Chan. + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Carapace ( +Figs. 7A, E +, +8A +, +22B +) squarish in general outline, 1.1 times broader than long; regions well defined, separated by deep grooves; postfrontal region distinct, separated into 4 lobes by deep grooves; front deflexed downwards ( +Figs. 7C, D +) margin intensely concave in dorsal view; lateral margin straight, subparallel along most of length before curving to join almost straight posterior carapace margin; cornea extending or just reaching tip of external orbital tooth (Figs. 77A, E, 8A, 22B). Ischium of third maxilliped with shallow median sulcus, merus with distinct submedian ridge; exopod slender, tip reaching half-length of outer margin of merus, flagellum long. Male cheliped palm with 2 transverse pectinate crests (13 and 10 corneous teeth, respectively) on upper surface; upper surface of dactylus with 6 to 8 (average 7) symmetrical, obliquely elongate dactylar tubercles, proximal 3 tubercles steep, sharp, the others tubercles large, distalmost 2 tubercles indistinct ( +Figs. 8C +, +19C +). Ambulatory legs relatively slender for this species-complex, P3 and P4 about 1.5 times carapace width; P3 and P4 coxae without dense setae; P3 merus 2.5 times as long as broad; P3 propodus 5.0 times as long as broad; P3 dactylus 0.4 times length of propodus ( +Fig. 20B +). G1 relatively slender; apical process corneous, elongated, slightly bent at angle of 45°, long, stout, ending in rounded tip ( +Figs. 8E, F +, +21C +). G2 longer than quarter length of G1 ( +Fig. 21C +). + + + +FIGURE 7 +. + +Parasesarma macaco + + +n. sp. + +. A–D, holotype male (13.8×12.3 mm) (NMNS-7779-005), Pingtung, Taiwan; E, F, paratype female (13.3×11.1 mm) (NMNS-7779-013), same locality. A, E, dorsal views; B, F, ventral views; C, D, frontal views. + + + +Colour in life +. In large individuals, the carapace is dark brown, mottled with darker and lighter blotches; females and juveniles occasionally have light orange blotches on the gastric region ( +Fig. 25C +). Chelipeds are yellowish orange, but brighter in males. Ambulatory legs are gray to brown ( +Figs. 22B +, +23B +, +24C +). + + + + +Remarks. + +Parasesarma macaco + + +n. sp. + +is most easily separated from other members of the species-complex by the medially concave frontal margin, and in having 6–8 dactylar tubercles of the chela (all tubercles are counted, including the small proximal and obsolescent distal ones). The specimens from +Bohol +Island, +Philippines +, differ from the other specimens in having a slightly longer G1 but the tip is of the same shape. The features that distinguish this species from its closest congeners are summarized in +Table 1 +. + + + + +Etymology. +Derived from the Portuguese " + +macaco + +" meaning “monkey”. It alludes to the agility of this treeclimbing species and its habit of jumping around branches. The name is used as a noun in apposition. + + + + +Distribution. +Taiwan +: Kangkou River and Paoli River ( +Pingtung county +) and Sicao ( +Tainan +city); +Philippines +: Mindoro and +Bohol +Island. + + + + +Ecology. + +Parasesarma macaco + + +n. sp. + +is a common species in Paoli River, +Taiwan +. In +Taiwan +and +Philippines +, most of specimens of + +P. macaco + +were collected at night, with specimens observed climbing the trees along the river banks of the estuary. The common host plants are + +Talipariti tiliaceum + +(L.) Fryxell, + +Clerodendrum inerme + +(L.) Gaertn. (in +Taiwan +) ( +Figs. 25A–C +), + +Bruguiera gymnorhiza + +(L.) Lam. and + +Avicennia marina +(Forsk.) Vierh. + +(in +Philippines +). When the water levels (from the rising tide and rainfall) reach the host plant, the crabs would climb downward and submerge in the water. + +Parasesarma macaco + + +n. sp. + +rarely ventures onto the ground except for breeding ( +Fig. 25D +). Ovigerous females were found almost all year around, but mainly in July to October. + + + +Parasesarma macaco + + +n. sp. + +occurs sympatrically with + +P. kui + + +n. sp. + +( +Taiwan +) and + +Metopograpsus latifrons + +( +Taiwan +and +Philippines +), the niche and ecology appear to be generally similar (see “Ecology” for + +P. kui + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFABFF94D1CDF9304681FCE2.xml b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFABFF94D1CDF9304681FCE2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1828bb9f0f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFABFF94D1CDF9304681FCE2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,624 @@ + + + +Identity of the tree-spider crab, Parasesarma leptosoma (Hilgendorf, 1869) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae), with descriptions of seven new species from the Western Pacific + + + +Author + +Li, Jheng-Jhang + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + + + +Author + +Ng, Peter K. L. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-09-19 + + +4482 + + +3 + + +451 +490 + + + +journal article +29418 +10.11646/zootaxa.4482.3.2 +fd24ef18-76ac-46f1-aec2-2faf5b0ff325 +1175-5326 +1440707 +3FBE11E2-9F97-4A29-92A9-67780C782E0D + + + + + + + +Parasesarma kui + +n. sp. + + + + +( +Figs. 9 +, +10 +, +19D +, +20C +, +21D +, +22C +, +23C +, +24D +, +25G +) + + + + + + +Material +examined. + +HOLOTYPE +: male (14.7× +13.7 mm +) (NMNS-7779-015), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Kenting National Park +: mouth of +Kangkou River +( + +on + +Talipariti tiliaceum + + +(L.) +Fryxell +), + +30 September 2015 + +, J.- +J. Li + +. + +PARATYPES +: +1 male +(12.6×11.0 mm) (NMNS-7779-016), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Kenting National Park +: mouth of +Kangkou River +, + +20 November 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 male +(14.5× +13.4 mm +) (NMNS-7779-017 +) +, +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Kenting National Park +: mouth of +Kangkou River +, + +3 May 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 male +(15.6×14.0 mm) (NMNS-7779-018), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Kenting National Park +: mouth of +Kangkou River +, + +16 October 2015 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 male +(16.7× +14.8 mm +) (NMNS- 7779-019), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Kenting National Park +: mouth of +Kangkou River +, + +22 June 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 female +(12.5× +11.3 mm +) ( +ZRC 2018.0790 +) +, +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Paoli River +, + +14 August 2015 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +—1 male (15.1× +14.1 mm +), + +1 female +(8.0× +7.1 mm +) (NMNS-7779-021), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Kenting National Park +: mouth of +Kangkou River +, + +1 May 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 male +(14.6× +13.2 mm +) (NMNS-7779-022 +) +, +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Kenting National Park +: mouth of +Kangkou River +, + +21 March 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +2 males +(15.3× +13.6 mm +, 14.2× +12.5 mm +) (NMNS-7779- 023), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Pingtung +: +Kenting National Park +: mouth of +Kangkou River +, + +1 November 2015 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 male +(16.5×15.0 mm) (NMNS-7779-024), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Kenting National Park +: mouth of +Kangkou River +, + +18 June 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 male +(15.1× +13.9 mm +) ( +ZRC 2018.0791 +), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Kenting National Park +: mouth of +Kangkou River +, + +10 August 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +2 males +(15.6× +13.9 mm +, 13.4× +14.2 mm +) ( +ZRC 2018.0792 +), +Taiwan +: +Pingtung +: +Kenting National Park +: mouth of +Kangkou River +, + +1 October 2015 + +, J.- +J. Li. + + + + + +FIGURE 9 +. + +Parasesarma kui + + +n. sp. + +. A–D, holotype male (14.7×13.7 mm) (NMNS-7779-015) Pingtung, Taiwan; E, F, paratype female (16.4×14.7 mm) (NMNS-7779-021), same locality. A, E, dorsal views; B, F, ventral views; C, D, frontal views. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Carapace ( +Figs. 9A, E +, +10A +, +22C +) squarish in general outline, 1.1 times broader than long; regions well defined, separated by shallow grooves; postfrontal region distinct, separated into 4 lobes by deep grooves; front deflexed downwards ( +Figs. 9C, D +), margin slightly concave in dorsal view; lateral margin straight, subparallel along most of length before curving to join almost straight posterior carapace margin; cornea extending or just reaching tip of external orbital tooth ( +Figs. 9A, E +, +10A +, +22C +). Ischium of third maxilliped with shallow median sulcus, merus with distinct submedian ridge; exopod slender, tip reaching half-length of outer margin of merus, flagellum long. Male cheliped palm with 2 transverse pectinate crests (12 and 7 corneous teeth, respectively) on upper surface; upper surface of dactylus with 9 or 10 symmetrical, obliquely elongate dactylar tubercles, proximal tubercles steep, sharp, the other tubercles large, distalmost tubercle indistinct ( +Figs. 10C, D +, +19D +). Ambulatory legs relatively slender for this species-complex, P3 and P4 about 1.6 times carapace width; P3 and P4 coxae without dense setae; P3 merus 2.6 times as long as broad; P3 propodus 4.4 times as long as broad; P3 dactylus 0.4 times length of propodus ( +Fig. 20C +). G1 relatively stout ( +Figs. 10E–H +, +21D +); apical process corneous, short, bent at angle of 45°, stout, ending in rounded tip. G2 longer than quarter length of G1 ( +Fig. 21D +). + + + +FIGURE 10 +. + +Parasesarma kui + + +n. sp. + +, holotype male (14.7×13.7 mm) (NMNS-7779-015), Pingtung, Taiwan. A, dorsal view of carapace; B–D, tip of left cheliped; E–H, left G1. B, lateral view of pectinated cristae on palm; C, dorsal view of palm and dactylar finger; D, lateral view of dactylar finger; E, G, dorsal (sternal) views; F, H, ventral (pleonal) views; E, F, distal part of G1. Scale bars: 1.0 mm. + + + +Colour in life. +In large males and females from +Taiwan +, the carapace is almost black, mottled with yellowish or greenish orange blotches. Juveniles are light brown throughout, with some juveniles possessing light orange blotches on the cardiac region. The chelipeds are white and the fingers orange. The ambulatory legs are gray to brown ( +Figs. 22C +, +23C +, +24D +). + + + + +Remarks. + +Parasesarma kui + + +n. sp. + +occurs sympatrically with + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + +in several areas of +Taiwan +, but can easily be distinguished by the orange colour on the finger tips when alive ( +Figs. 23C +, +25G +) (both chelae and fingers organge for + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + +, +Figs. 23B +, +25B +), the slightly concave frontal margin ( +Figs. 9A, E +, +10A +) (strongly concave in + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + +, +Figs. 7A, E +, +8A +), as well as the number of dactylar tubercles of the chela ( +10 in + +P. kui + + +n. sp. + +; +6–8 in + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + +). + +Parasesarma kui + + +n. sp. + +juvenile are morphologically most similar to + +P. parvulum + + +n. sp. + +, but the latter species can easily be separated from + +P. kui + +by the dense brush of setae on the coxae of P3 and P4 ( +Fig. 15E +). This dense coxal brush of setae is always absent in + +P. kui + + +n. sp. + +regardless of the ontogenetic stages. Differentiating characters among this new species and the other close relatives are summarized in +Table 1 +. + + + + +Etymology. +Named for Mr. Ching-Fang Ku, a ranger in the Kenting National Park and specialist of land crab conservation. The +type +locality of + +P. kui + + +n. sp. + +, Kangkou River, is found in his home village of Kangkou. + + + + +Distribution. +So far known from southern +Taiwan +(Kangkou and Paoli River). + + + + +Ecology. +In +Taiwan +, + +Parasesarma kui + + +n. sp. + +lives sympatrically with + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + +and + +Metopograpsus latifrons +(Grapsidae) + +, in the Paoli River. Its habitat and behavior are similar to that of + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + +, and it often climbs on + +Pandanus tectorius + +in the Kangkou River as well ( +Figs. 25F, G +). Some behavioral differences were observed between + +P. kui + + +n. sp. + +and + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + +in +Taiwan +: + +P. kui + + +n. sp. + +seems to prefer water of a lower salinity (0–15 ppt) and tends to inhabit relatively broader branches of the mangrove trees, and environments with higher humidity (around 87%). + +Parasesarma macaco + + +n. sp. + +on the other hand, occurs in more saline waters (around 30 ppt) and prefers more slender branches and environments with a lower humidity. A study of the microhabitat preferences of these species is being conducted by the first author and Yi-Shin Chian (National +Ping Tung +University of Science and Technology, + +Taiwan +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFADFF8BD1CDFD444536FC87.xml b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFADFF8BD1CDFD444536FC87.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9d43ae6d37b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFADFF8BD1CDFD444536FC87.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1028 @@ + + + +Identity of the tree-spider crab, Parasesarma leptosoma (Hilgendorf, 1869) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae), with descriptions of seven new species from the Western Pacific + + + +Author + +Li, Jheng-Jhang + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + + + +Author + +Ng, Peter K. L. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-09-19 + + +4482 + + +3 + + +451 +490 + + + +journal article +29418 +10.11646/zootaxa.4482.3.2 +fd24ef18-76ac-46f1-aec2-2faf5b0ff325 +1175-5326 +1440707 +3FBE11E2-9F97-4A29-92A9-67780C782E0D + + + + + + + +Parasesarma gecko + +n. sp. + + + + +( +Figs. 4–6 +, +19B +, +20A +, +21B +, +22A +, +23A +, +24B +, +25E +) + + + + + + +Sesarma leptosoma +, + +De Man 1889 +: 436 + + +, pl. 10, fig. 11.—Ortmann 1894: 725. Not + +Parasesarma leptosoma +( +Hilgendorf, 1869 +) + +. + + + + + +Parasesarma +aff. +leptosoma +, + +Nakasone 1977 +: 10 + + +, 11.—Nishidaira 1980: 66. + + + + + +Sesarma +( +Parasesarma +) +leptosoma +, + +McLay & Ryan 1990 +: 115 + + +, table 2. Not + +Parasesarma leptosoma +( +Hilgendorf, 1869 +) + +. + + + + + +Parasesarma leptosoma +, Takeda & Nunomura 1976: 86 + +.— + +Davie 2002 +: 223 + +.—Shokita +et al +. 2002: 78. —Shokita +et al +. 2003: 102.—Rahayu & Ng 2009: 35.— + + +Koller +et al +. 2010 + +: 359 + +.— + +Naruse 2010 +: 51 + +.— + +Maenosono & Naruse 2015 +: 13 + +, figs. 2E, 6, 11E, F.— + +Maenosono & Saeki 2016 +: 8 + +, table 1. Not + +Parasesarma leptosoma +( +Hilgendorf, 1869 +) + +. + + + + + + + +Material +examined. + +HOLOTYPE +: male (16.2× +14.6 mm +) (RUMF-ZC-4710), +Japan +: +Okinawa +Island: +Awase +( + +on + +Kandelia obovata +Sheue, Liu & Yong + + +), + +18 July 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li + +. + +PARATYPES +: +1 male +(14.5× +12.3 mm +) ( +ZRC 2008.0501 +), +Guam +: near +Pago Bay +, + +August 2001 + +, H.- +C. Liu. + +—1 male (14.4× +12.6 mm +), + +1 female +(12.5×11.0 mm) ( +ZRC 2008.1252 +), +Japan +: +Miyako Island +: +Shimajiri +, + +20 March 2001 + +, +P.K.L. Ng. + +—1 male (15.9× +13.7 mm +), + +1 female +(15.3×13.0 mm) ( +ASIZ 73381 +) +Japan +: +Yaeyama Islands +: +Iriomote Island +, + +17 September 2004 + +, H.- +C. Liu. + +— 3 males (13.0× +11.3 mm +, 12.5×11.0 mm, 10.4×9.0 mm), + +1 female +(10.1× +8.5 mm +), 1 ovigerous female (11.9×10.3) (NMNS-7779-001), +Japan +: +Okinawa +Island: +Awase +, + +18 July 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +5 males +(17.0× +15.1 mm +, 16.9× +15.1 mm +, 15.9× +14.3 mm +, 15.5× +13.7 mm +, 13.4×12.0 mm), 1 ovigerous female (11.8×9.9) (NMNS-7779-003), +Japan +: +Okinawa +Island: +Awase +, + +19 July 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +2 males +(16.6× +14.4 mm +, 15.6× +14.1 mm +) (NMNS-7779-004), +Japan +: +Okinawa +Islands: +Yagaji Island +, + +20 July 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. + +— + +1 female +(11.7×9.7) (RUMF-ZC-2898), +Japan +: +Okinawa +Island: +Nago +: +Oura River +, + +13 April 2010 + +, +T. Naruse. + +— + +2 males +(13.4× +11.4 mm +, 10.6× +8.9 mm +) (RUMF- ZC-2899), +Japan +: +Okinawa +Island: +Nago +: +Oura River +, + +4 June 2010 + +, +T. Naruse. + +— + +1 male +(14.8× +12.5 mm +) (RUMF- ZC-2900), +Japan +: +Okinawa +Islands: +Yagaji Island +: +Gabu +, + +9 June 2010 + +, +T. Naruse. + +—1 male (12.3×10.0 mm), + +1 female +(10.8× +8.3 mm +) (RUMF-ZC-2901), +Japan +: +Okinawa +Island: +Kin +: +Okukubi River +, + +8 February 2014 + +, +T. Naruse. + +— + +1 male +(15.9× +13.9 mm +) (RUMF-ZC-2902), +Japan +: +Miyako Island +: +Kawamitsu +, + +18 February 2014 + +, +T. Naruse. + +— + +1 male +(16.9×14.5) (RUMF-ZC-2903), +Japan +: +Okinawa +Islands: +Yagaji Island +: +Gabu +, + +9 March 2010 + +, +Naruse. + +—2 males (17.4×14.7, 15.5×13.0 mm), + +1 female +(16.5× +14.3 mm +) (RUMF-ZC-2930), +Japan +: +Yaeyama Islands +: +Iriomote Island +: +Utara River +, + +4 May 2014 + +, +Naruse. + +— + +3 males +(1.7× +12.4 mm +, 13.4×12.0 mm, 10.9× +9.5 mm +), 1 ovigerous female (15.6× +13.8 mm +) (RUMF-ZC-4711), + +Japan + + +: + +Okinawa +Island: +Awase +, + +17 July 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. +—1 ovigerous female (20.2×17.5) (NMNS-7779-002) (leg variation), +Japan + +: + +Okinawa +Island: +Awase +, + +18 July 2016 + +, J.- +J. Li. Other +material + +: + +5 males +(19.1× +16.6 mm +, 14.9× +13.3 mm +, 13.7× +11.5 mm +, 12.9×11.0 mm, 12.4× +10.4 mm +), 4 ovigerous females (18.1× +15.4 mm +, 16.8× +14.8 mm +, 16.5× +14.2 mm +, 16.2× +14.1 mm +) (NMNS-7779-006), +Guam +, + +September 2008 + +, H.-C. +Liu. + +—1 male (13.3× +11.5 mm +) (ZRC 2017.196), Vanuatu: + +West Baldwin Cove +, +Nasouli River +mouth intertidal, hard bottom, +Expédition +SANTO 2006 +, station VM4, intertidal area near mangroves, +15°34.9'S +167°01.8'E +, + +11 September 2006 + +, +P.K.L. Ng +et al +..— +1 adult +female (13.2× +11.5 mm +) + +, 2 juvenile females (8.9× +7.6 mm +, 8.6× +7.2 mm +) (ZRC 2017.197), Vanuatu: + +Belmoul +lagoon channel, intertidal, sand and muddy sand, +Expédition +SANTO 2006 +, station VM9, intertidal area near mangroves, +15°35.8'S +167°06.2'E +, + +13 September 2006 + +, +P.K.L. Ng +et al +. + + + + + +FIGURE 4 +. + +Parasesarma gecko + + +n. sp. + +. A–D, holotype male (16.2×14.6 mm) (RUMF-ZC-4710), Okinawa Island, Japan; E, F, paratype female (15.3×13.0 mm) (ASIZ 73381), Iriomote Island, Japan; G, H, female (20.2×17.5 mm) (NMNS-7779-002), Okinawa Island, Japan, showing abnormal right second ambulatory leg; I, J, paratype male (15.9×13.7 mm) (ASIZ 73381), Iriomote Island, Japan, showing asymmetrical chelae. A, E, G, I, dorsal views; B, F, H, J, ventral views; C, D, frontal views. + + + + +FIGURE 5 +. + +Parasesarma gecko + + +n. sp. + +, holotype male (16.2×14.6 mm) (RUMF-ZC-4710), Okinawa, Japan. A, dorsal view of carapace; B, lateral view of pectinated cristae on palm of left chela; C, dorsal view of tip of left cheliped; D–G, left G1. D, F, dorsal (sternal) views; E, G, ventral (pleonal) views; D, E, distal part of G1. Scale bars: 1.0 mm. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Carapace ( +Figs. 4A, E, G, I +, +5A +, +22A +) squarish in general outline, 1.2 times broader than long; regions well defined, separated by shallow grooves; postfrontal region distinct, separated into 4 lobes by deep grooves; front deflexed downwards ( +Figs. 4C +), margin slightly concave in dorsal view; lateral margin straight, subparallel along most of length before curving to join almost straight posterior carapace margin; cornea extending or just reaching tip of external orbital tooth ( +Figs. 4A, E, G, I +, +5A +, +22A +). Ischium of third maxilliped with shallow median sulcus, merus with distinct submedian ridge; exopod slender, tip reaching half-length of outer margin of merus, flagellum long. Male cheliped palm with 2 (sometimes 3) transverse pectinate crests ( +11–13 and 3–10 +corneous teeth, respectively) ( +Figs. 5B, C +, +6A–C +) on upper surface; upper surface of dactylus with 10–15 (mostly 11) symmetrical, obliquely elongate dactylar tubercles, proximal 1–5 tubercles steep, sharp, other tubercles large but becoming lower distally, distalmost tubercle indistinct ( +Figs. 5C +, +6D–F +, +19B +). Ambulatory legs relatively stout for this species-complex, P3 and P4 about 1.7 times carapace width; P3 and P4 coxae without dense setae; P3 merus 2.5 times as long as broad; P3 propodus 4.8 times as long as broad; P3 dactylus 0.4 times length of propodus ( +Fig. 20A +). G1 relatively slender ( +Figs. 5D–G +, +21B +), slightly bent; apical process corneous, elongated, slightly bent at angle of 45°, long, stout, ending in rounded tip ( +Figs. 5D–G +, +21B +). G2 short, less than quarter length of G1 ( +Fig. 21B +). + + + +FIGURE 6 +. + +Parasesarma gecko + + +n. sp. + +, left chela. A, D, paratype male (14.4×12.6 mm) (ZRC 2008.1252), Miyako Island, Japan; B, E, paratype male (15.9×13.7 mm) (ASIZ 73381), Iriomote Island, Japan; C, F, paratype male (14.5× 12.3 mm) (ZRC 2008.0501), Guam. A–C, dorsal views of pectinated cristae on palm, arrow points to direction of dactylar finger; D–F, lateral views of pectinated cristae on palm. Scale bars: 1.0 mm. + + + +Morphological variation. +Several male specimens have asymmetrical chelipeds ( + +Figs. +4I +, J + +), probably due to regeneration of lost limbs. The dactylar tubercles of the male chela ranges from 10 to 15 (average 11) ( +Figs. 6D–F +). The corneous teeth of the proximal transverse pectinate crest on the male cheliped palm varies from 3 to 10 ( +Figs. 6A–C +). + + + + +Colour in life. +Carapace dark brown, mottled with darker and lighter blotches; chelipeds brownish orange, but more yellowish in large males; ambulatory legs brown ( +Figs. 22A +, +23A +, +24B +, +25E +). + + + + +Remarks. + +Parasesarma gecko + + +n. sp. + +most closely resembles + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + +in having yellowish chela in life and the relatively slender G1, but it can be distinguished from the latter by the number of dactylar tubercles on the male chela ( +10–15 in + +P. gecko + + +n. sp. + +versus +6–8 in + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + +). The other differentiating characters are summarized in +Table 1 +. + + +The sizes of ovigerous females of + +P. gecko + + +n. sp. + +show substantial disparity (the smallest carapace width is +11.8 mm +and the largest is +20.2 mm +), but no other obvious morphological variation detected between small and large specimens. The cheliped asymmetry in + +P. gecko + + +n. sp. + +is common in males ( + +Figs. +4I +, J + +). Other than the asymmetry, the dactylar tubercles and the proximal pectinate crest on the palm vary substantially from +10–15 and 3–10 +, respectively. Such wide range of variation has not been observed in other species of this complex. We also found a female with malformed ambulatory legs ( +Figs. 4G, H +). The variations might result from the tendency of + +P. gecko + + +n. sp. + +to automise its chelipeds and ambulatory legs more readily compared to other species we have observed (see “Ecology”). There are several records from +Japan +referred to + +P. leptosoma + +. +Nakasone (1977) +first recorded “ + +P. +aff. +leptosoma + +” from Gesaji River, +Okinawa +Island, and noted that the crabs often climb on the mangrove aerial roots and leaves. Nishidaira (1980: 66) also recorded + +P. +aff. +leptosoma + +from Ishigaki and Iriomote Islands. Shokita (2002) first formally recorded + +P. leptosoma + +from Oura River, +Okinawa +Island, and later from Sakagawa River, +Okinawa +Island (Shokita 2003). Recently, +Maenosono & Naruse (2015) +reported + +P. leptosoma + +from the Ryukyu Islands, and concluded that the “ + +P +. aff. +leptosoma + +” (listed by +Nakasone (1977) +and Nishidaira (1980) and + +P. leptosoma + +represent the same species. Our study has shown that only + +P. gecko + + +n. sp. + +occurs in the Ryukyu Islands, and consequently, the previous records of + +P. leptosoma + +from the area are all referred to this new species. + + +De Man (1889) +, Ortmann (1894) and +McLay & Ryan (1990) +reported + +Sesarma leptosoma + +from +Fiji +Island. +De Man (1889) +’s illustrations (pl. 10 +Fig. 11 +) show the shape of frontal border of the carapace in the dorsal view is distinctly concave, but this feature is not observed in the true + +P. leptosoma + +from Africa. The morphology of this Fijian material instead matches that of + +P. gecko + + +n. sp. + +which is known for certain from +Japan +, +Guam +and +Vanuatu +. +Davie (2002) +recorded material from +Queensland +, +Australia +, and on the basis of geography, his record is probably + +P. gecko + + +n. sp. + +Takeda & Nunomura (1976) listed + +P. leptosoma + +from +New Caledonia +based on two females, and although no figure was provided, this record falls inside the range of + +P. gecko + + +n. sp. + +, and as such, their record is also referred to this species. + + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet alludes to the new species’ quick movements on vertical surfaces and its tendency to autotomise its appendages when handled, as also observed in the eponymous lizard. The name is used here as a noun in apposition. + + + + +Distribution. +Japan +: +Okinawa +Island, Miyako Island, Ishigaki Island, Iriomote Island ( +Nakasone 1977 +; Nishidaira 1980; Shokita 2002, 2003; + +Koller +et al +. 2010 + +; +Naruse 2010 +; +Maenosono & Naruse 2015 +; +Maenosono & Saeki 2016 +); +Guam +(Rahayu & Ng 2009), +Queensland +, +Australia +( +Davie 2002 +); +Fiji +( +De Man 1889 +; Ortmann 1894; +McLay & Ryan 1990 +), +New Caledonia +(Takeda & Nunomura 1976) and +Vanuatu +(present study). + + + + +Ecology. +In +Okinawa +Island, + +Parasesarma gecko + + +n. sp. + +is common on the mangrove trees + +Kandelia obovata +Sheue, Liu & Yong + +, + +Pandanus odoratissimus +Linn. + +, as well as on rocks and man-made vertical structures (e.g. cement and pillars) ( +Fig. 25E +) near estuarine waters ( +Maenosono & Naruse 2015 +; +Maenosono & Saeki 2016 +). It was found together with + +Metopograpsus latifrons +(White, 1847) (Grapsidae) + +in the same habitat ( +Okinawa +Island, +Japan +) (present paper). The new species is active during day and night time, moves fast between mangrove roots, branches or other vertical surfaces. + +Parasesarma gecko + + +n. sp. + +tends to lose its appendages very readily when captured, apparently more so than + +P. kui + + +n. sp. + +, + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + +from +Taiwan +and + +P. tarantula + + +n. sp. + +from Sulawesi. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFB0FF91D1CDF8F24053FD72.xml b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFB0FF91D1CDF8F24053FD72.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..40403f9d34b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFB0FF91D1CDF8F24053FD72.xml @@ -0,0 +1,462 @@ + + + +Identity of the tree-spider crab, Parasesarma leptosoma (Hilgendorf, 1869) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae), with descriptions of seven new species from the Western Pacific + + + +Author + +Li, Jheng-Jhang + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + + + +Author + +Ng, Peter K. L. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-09-19 + + +4482 + + +3 + + +451 +490 + + + +journal article +29418 +10.11646/zootaxa.4482.3.2 +fd24ef18-76ac-46f1-aec2-2faf5b0ff325 +1175-5326 +1440707 +3FBE11E2-9F97-4A29-92A9-67780C782E0D + + + + + + + +Parasesarma purpureum + +n. sp. + + + + +( +Figs. 13 +, +14 +, +19F +, +20E +, +21F +, +22D +, +23D +, +24E +) + + + + + + +Material +examined. + +HOLOTYPE +: male (15.9× +13.7 mm +) ( +ZRC 2012.0755 +a), Peninsular +Malaysia +: +Tioman Island +, + +7 July 2012 + +, +B.Y. Lee + +. PARATYPES: 3 males (10.7× +9.2 mm +, 13.9×12.0 mm, 15.5× +13.3 mm +), + +4 females +(12.6× +10.7 mm +, 13.5×12.0 mm, 14.9× +12.7 mm +, 15.6×13.0 mm) ( +ZRC 2018.0794 +), same data as holotype. + +—3 males (11.9×10.0 mm, 12.7× +10.8 mm +, 14.2× +12.8 mm +), + +4 females +(10.9×9.0 mm, 12.1× +10.6 mm +, 12.6× +10.5 mm +, 14.0× +12.2 mm +) ( +ZRC 2018.0795 +), Peninsular +Malaysia +: +Tioman Island +, + +4 July 2012 + +, +B.Y. Lee. + +—2 males (11.4×10.0 mm, 11.7× +9.8 mm +), + +1 female +(13.5×11.2) ( +ZRC 2018.0796 +), Peninsular +Malaysia +: +Tioman Island +, + +5 July 2012 + +, +B.Y. Lee. + +—3 males (12.7× +10.8 mm +, 13.1× +10.8 mm +, 13.1× +10.9 mm +), + +3 females +(12.3× +10.4 mm +, 13.6× +11.5 mm +, 16.1×14.0 mm) ( +ZRC 2018.0797 +), Peninsular +Malaysia +: +Tioman Island +, + +6 July 2012 + +, +B.Y. Lee. + +—1 male (12.2× +10.5 mm +), + +1 female +(14.5×13.0 mm) ( +ZRC 2012.0755 +b), Peninsular +Malaysia +: +Tioman Island +, + +7 July 2012 + +, +B.Y. Lee. + +—3 males (15.0× +13.5 mm +, 13.4× +11.8 mm +, 10.9× +9.8 mm +), + +2 females +(13.9×13.6, 12.3×11.1) ( +ZRC 2018.0799 +), +Malaysia +: +Borneo +: +Sabah +, + +27 February 2018 + +, J.- +J. Li +et al. +. + +—1 male (12.6× +11.5 mm +), + +1 female +(15.4× +13.8 mm +) ( +MZB +Cru +4800), +Malaysia +: +Borneo +: +Sabah +, + +27 February 2018 + +, J.- +J. Li +et al. +. + +— + +1 male +(13.7× +12.4 mm +) (NMNS-7779-027), +Malaysia +: +Borneo +: +Sabah +, + +27 February 2018 + +, J.- +J. Li +et al. +. + +— + +2 males +(14.5×13.0 mm, 14.3× +13.4 mm +) ( +NMCR 50704 +), +Malaysia +: +Borneo +: +Sabah +, + +27 February 2018 + +, J.- +J. Li +et al. +. + + + + + +FIGURE 13 +. + +Parasesarma purpureum + + +n. sp. + +. A–D, holotype male (15.9×13.7 mm) (ZRC 2012.0755a), Tioman Island, Peninsular Malaysia; E, F, paratype female (ZRC 2012.0755b), same locality. A, E, dorsal views; B, F, ventral views; C, D, frontal views. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Carapace ( +Figs. 13A, E +, +14A +, +22D +) squarish in general outline, 1.2 times broader than long; regions well defined, separated by shallow grooves; postfrontal region distinct, separated into 4 lobes by deep grooves; front deflexed downwards ( +Figs. 13C, D +) margin slightly concave in dorsal view; lateral margin straight, subparallel along most of length before curving to join almost straight posterior carapace margin; cornea extending or just reaching tip of external orbital tooth ( +Figs. 13A, E +, +14A +, +22D +). Ischium of third maxilliped with shallow median sulcus, merus with distinct submedian ridge; exopod slender, tip reaching half-length of outer margin of merus, flagellum long. Male cheliped palm with 2 transverse pectinate crests (12 and 7 corneous teeth, respectively) on upper surface; upper surface of dactylus with 9 or 10 symmetrical, obliquely elongate dactylar tubercles, proximal tubercles steep, sharp, the others tubercles large, distalmost tubercle indistinct ( +Figs. 14C, D +, +19F +). Ambulatory legs relatively slender for this species-complex, P3 and P4 about 1.6 times carapace width; P3 and P4 coxae without dense setae; P3 merus 2.6 times as long as broad; P3 propodus 4.4 times as long as broad; P3 dactylus 0.4 times length of propodus ( +Fig. 20E +). G1 relatively stout ( +Figs. 14E–H +, +21F +,); apical process corneous, short, bent at angle of 45°, long, stout, ending in rounded tip. G2 longer than quarter length of G1 ( +Fig. 21F +). + + + +FIGURE 14 +. + +Parasesarma purpureum + + +n. sp. + +, holotype male (15.9×13.7 mm) (ZRC 2012.0755a), Tioman, Peninsular Malaysia. A, dorsal view of carapace; B–D, tip of left cheliped; E–H, left G1; B, lateral view of pectinate cristae on palm; C, dorsal view of palm and dactylar finger; D, lateral view of dactylar finger; E, G, dorsal (sternal) views; F, H, ventral (pleonal) views; E, F, distal part of G1. Scale bars: 1.0 mm. + + + +Colour in life. +Carapace dark brown, fingers of chelipeds are pale white, ambulatory legs violet or purplish brown. ( +Fig. 22D +, +23D +, +24E +). + + + + +Remarks. + +Parasesarma purpureum + + +n. sp. + +, is most similar to + +P. kui + + +n. sp. + +(from +Taiwan +) with regards to its relatively broader carapace. However, the following differences are observed; the carapace surface of + +P. purpureum + +has scattered tufts of short setae, the dactylar tubercles of the male chela are consistently nine in number ( +Figs. 14D +, +19F +,); the corneous tip of the G1 is proportionately broader ( +Figs. 14E–H +); and the general colour in life is dark purple, or brownish-purplish with white chelae ( +Figs. 22D +, +23D +). By contrast, in + +P. kui + + +n. sp. + +, the carapace surface is glabrous; the dactylar tubercles are nine or ten ( +Figs. 10C, D +, +19D +); the corneous tip of the G1 is proportionately narrower ( +Figs. 10E–H +), and in life, the colour of the carapace is black or light brown, with the chelae possessing orange fingers ( +Figs. 22C +, +23C +). + + + + +Etymology. +From the Latin + +purpureum + +for “purple” with reference to the general colour of the new species. + + + + +Distribution. +So far known from Tioman Island, Peninsular +Malaysia +; and +Sabah +, East +Malaysia +, Borneo. + + + + +Ecology. + +Parasesarma purpureum + + +n. sp. + +in Malaysia (Tioman Island and Sabah) is often observed at night and climbing on mangrove tree trunks and aerial roots above the water level. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFB3FF91D1CDFD01465FF814.xml b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFB3FF91D1CDFD01465FF814.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..47fb6d96f78 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFB3FF91D1CDFD01465FF814.xml @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@ + + + +Identity of the tree-spider crab, Parasesarma leptosoma (Hilgendorf, 1869) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae), with descriptions of seven new species from the Western Pacific + + + +Author + +Li, Jheng-Jhang + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + + + +Author + +Ng, Peter K. L. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-09-19 + + +4482 + + +3 + + +451 +490 + + + +journal article +29418 +10.11646/zootaxa.4482.3.2 +fd24ef18-76ac-46f1-aec2-2faf5b0ff325 +1175-5326 +1440707 +3FBE11E2-9F97-4A29-92A9-67780C782E0D + + + + + + + +Parasesarma parvulum + +n. sp. + + + + +( +Figs. 15 +, +16 +, +19G +, +20F +, +21G +) + + + + + + +Material +examined. + +HOLOTYPE +: +Male +(9.6× +8.4 mm +) ( +NMCR 50702 +), +Naujan +, +Mindoro Island +, +Philippines +, + +5 March 2016 + +, W.- +B. Chan + +. PARATYPES: 5 males (10.0× +8.7 mm +, 9.9× +8.4 mm +, 8.0×6.0 mm, 7.8× +6.8 mm +, 7.8× +6.8 mm +), + +4 females +(9.9× +8.2 mm +, 9.4× +8.2 mm +, 8.8× +7.4 mm +, 8.6× +7.3 mm +) ( +NMCR 50703 +), same data as holotype + +.—3 males (10.7× +9.7 mm +, 10.1× +8.7 mm +, 10.1× +8.6 mm +), + +4 females +(11.3× +9.6 mm +, 9.7× +8.5 mm +, 9.3× +8.1 mm +, 9.0× +7.8 mm +) (NMNS-7779-026), same data as holotype + +.—2 males (7.8× +6.8 mm +, 8.5× +7.4 mm +), + +1 female +(11.4× +9.8 mm +) ( +ZRC 2018.0800 +), same data as holotype + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Carapace ( +Figs. 15A, F +, +16A +) squarish in general outline, 1.1 times broader than long; regions well defined, separated by shallow grooves; postfrontal region distinct, separated into 4 lobes by deep grooves; front deflexed downwards ( +Figs. 15C, D +) margin slightly concave in dorsal view; lateral margin straight, converging posteriorly; cornea extending or just reaching tip of external orbital tooth ( +Figs. 15A, F +, +16A +). Ischium of third maxilliped with shallow median sulcus, merus with distinct submedian ridge; exopod slender, tip reaching half-length of outer margin of merus, flagellum long. Male cheliped palm with 2 transverse pectinate crests (18 and 10 corneous teeth, distal and proximal crests, respectively) on upper surface; upper surface of dactylus with 10 symmetrical, obliquely elongate dactylar tubercles, proximal tubercles steep, sharp, the others tubercles large, distalmost tubercle indistinct ( +Figs. 16C, D +, +19G +). Ambulatory legs relatively slender for this species-complex, P3 and P4 about 1.5 times carapace width; P3 and P4 coxae with dense setae; P3 merus 2.5 times as long as broad; P3 propodus 4.8 times as long as broad; P3 dactylus 0.4 times length of propodus ( +Fig. 20F +). G1 relatively stout ( +Figs. 16E–H +, +21G +); apical process corneous, short, bent at angle of 45°, long, stout, ending in rounded tip. G2 longer than quarter length of G1 ( +Fig. 21G +). + + +Colour in life. +Colour in general is similar to + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + +(W.-B. Chan, pers. comm.). + + + + +Remarks. + +Parasesarma parvulum + + +n. sp. + +morphologically resembles juveniles of + +P. kui + + +n. sp. + +but can still be distinguished by the granulation on outer surface of palm is relatively minute and the coxae of P3 and P4 with dense setae (see +Table 1 +). + + + + +Etymology. +The name + +parvulum + +derives from the Latin word, meaning young or small, alluding to the relative small size of the present species. + + + + +Distribution. +So far known from Kalinisan, in Naujan, +Oriental Mindoro +province, Mindoro Island, +Philippines +. + + + + +Ecology. +In +Philippines +, most of the specimens of + +P. parvulum + +found were observed climbing on the mangrove trees + +Bruguiera gymnorhiza + +(L.) Lam. and + +Avicennia marina +(Forsk.) Vierh. + +along the river banks of the estuary, and occurs sympatrically with + +Parasesarma macaco + + +n. sp. + +and + +Metopograpsus latifrons +(Grapsidae) + +(W.-B. Chan, pers. comm.). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFB6FF95D1CDFC7C4548F812.xml b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFB6FF95D1CDFC7C4548F812.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e81c2e96642 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFB6FF95D1CDFC7C4548F812.xml @@ -0,0 +1,376 @@ + + + +Identity of the tree-spider crab, Parasesarma leptosoma (Hilgendorf, 1869) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae), with descriptions of seven new species from the Western Pacific + + + +Author + +Li, Jheng-Jhang + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + + + +Author + +Ng, Peter K. L. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-09-19 + + +4482 + + +3 + + +451 +490 + + + +journal article +29418 +10.11646/zootaxa.4482.3.2 +fd24ef18-76ac-46f1-aec2-2faf5b0ff325 +1175-5326 +1440707 +3FBE11E2-9F97-4A29-92A9-67780C782E0D + + + + + + + +Parasesarma gracilipes + +n. sp. + + + + +( +Figs. 11 +, +12 +, +19E +, +20D +, +21E +) + + + + + + +Sesarma +( +Parasesarma +) +leptosoma +, + +De Man 1902 +: 534 + + +.—Nobili 1905: 497.—Rathbun 1910: 309, pl. 4, fig. 1. Not + +Parasesarma leptosoma +( +Hilgendorf, 1869 +) + +. + + + + +Parasesarma leptosoma +, Rahayu & Setyadi 2009: 51 + +, unnumbered figure. Not + +Parasesarma leptosoma +( +Hilgendorf, 1869 +) + +. + + + + + + +Material +examined. + +HOLOTYPE +: male (13.6× +11.9 mm +) ( +MZB +Cru +4803), +Indonesia +: +Papua +: +Ajkwa River +, + +11 June 2005 + +, +D.L. Rahayu + +. + +PARATYPES +: +1 female +(12.5× +10.7 mm +) ( +ZRC 2000.1881 +), +Indonesia +: +Ajkwa River + +3 August 1999 + +, +G. Setyadi. + +— + +1 male +(12.6× +10.9 mm +) ( +ZRC 2000.1882 +), +Indonesia +: +Minajerwi +, +Papua +, mangrove, + +12 August 1999 + +, +G. Setyadi. + +— + +1 male +(14.2×12.0 mm) ( +ZRC 2000.1883 +), +Indonesia +: +Papua +, +Kamora +mangrove +Indonesia +, + +4 April 2000 + +, +D.L. Rahayu. + +— + +1 female +(13.4× +11.7 mm +) ( +ZRC 2018.0793 +), +Indonesia +: +Papua +: +Ajkwa River +, + +11 June 2005 + +, +D. L. Rahayu. + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Carapace ( +Figs. 11A, E +, +12A +) squarish in general outline, 1.1 times broader than long; regions well defined, separated by shallow grooves; surface with scattered tufts of short setae; postfrontal region distinct, separated into 4 lobes by deep grooves; front deflexed downwards ( +Figs. 11C, D +) margin intensely concave in dorsal view; lateral margin straight, subparallel along most of length before curving to join almost straight posterior carapace margin; cornea extending or just reaching tip of external orbital tooth ( +Figs. 11A, E +, +12A +). Ischium of third maxilliped with shallow median sulcus, merus with distinct submedian ridge; exopod slender, tip reaching half-length of outer margin of merus, flagellum long. Male cheliped palm with 2 transverse pectinate crests (11 and 9 corneous teeth, respectively) on upper surface; upper surface of dactylus with 7 or 8 symmetrical, obliquely elongate dactylar tubercles, proximal 3 tubercles steep, sharp, the others tubercles large, distalmost tubercle indistinct ( +Figs. 12C, D +, +19E +). Ambulatory legs relatively slender for this species-complex, P3 and P4 about 1.6 times carapace width; P3 and P4 coxae without dense setae; P3 merus 3.1 times as long as broad; P3 propodus 5.9 times as long as broad; P3 dactylus 0.3 times length of propodus ( +Fig. 20D +). G1 relatively stout ( +Figs. 12E–H +, +20E +); apical process corneous, elongated, slightly bent at angle of 45°, stout, ending in rounded tip. G2 longer than quarter length of G1 ( +Fig. 21E +). + + +Colour in life. +General colour dark brown. Carapace mottled light brown and dark brown, palm of cheliped yellow or whitish yellow, fingers reddish orange or light orange (Rahayu & Setyadi 2003). + + + + +Remarks. + +Parasesarma gracilipes + + +n. sp. + +can easily be separated from other species in the species-complex by its relatively slender and longer ambulatory legs which are the longest among the members ( +Fig. 20D +). The ratio of merus length/width of the P3 is 3.1 (other species as 2.40–2.67) while the P3 propodus is 5.9 times as long as broad (other species as 4.1–5.0) ( +Fig. 20D +). Other features that distinguish this species from its congeners are given in +Table 1 +. + + +De Man (1902) +reported + +Parasesarma leptosoma + +from Halmahera, +Indonesia +[as + +Sesarma +( +Parasesarma +) + +], and noticed that the specimens had more slender legs than those crabs from Africa he examined. Similarly, Rathbun (1910) recorded +“ + +Sesarma +( +Parasesarma +) +leptosoma +Hilgendorf + +, var. +” +from Jobi Island, Dutch New +Guinea +(now +Papua +, +Indonesia +), and commented that the specimens had more slender legs than what +De Man (1889 +; not +1902 +) mentioned in his description and figure. On this basis of these notes, and partly on the geography, we refer those previous records of + +P. leptosoma + +from +Indonesia +to + +P. gracilipes + + +n. sp. + +for the time being. + + + + +FIGURE 11 +. + +Parasesarma gracilipes + + +n. sp. + +. A–D, holotype male (13.6×11.9 mm) (MZB Cru 4803), Papua, Indonesia; E, F, paratype female (13.4×11.7 mm) (ZRC 2018.0793), same locality. A, E, dorsal views; B, F, ventral views; C, D, frontal views. + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin " +gracilis +" (slender) and " +pes +" (legs), referring to the slender ambulatory legs of the species. + + + + +Distribution. +Indonesia +: Jobi Island (Rathbun 1910), Halmahera ( +De Man 1902 +), +Papua +(Nobili, 1905; Rathbun 1910; Rahayu & Setyadi 2009). + + + + +Ecology. + +Parasesarma gracilipes + + +n. sp. + +is active on muddy substrate in mangrove forest (Rahayu & Setyadi 2009), occurring in the intertidal, area some distance from the river bank. They move fast between mangrove roots even during the day. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFB9FF9BD1CDFF6F41AEFC36.xml b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFB9FF9BD1CDFF6F41AEFC36.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..94331de9889 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFB9FF9BD1CDFF6F41AEFC36.xml @@ -0,0 +1,303 @@ + + + +Identity of the tree-spider crab, Parasesarma leptosoma (Hilgendorf, 1869) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae), with descriptions of seven new species from the Western Pacific + + + +Author + +Li, Jheng-Jhang + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + + + +Author + +Ng, Peter K. L. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-09-19 + + +4482 + + +3 + + +451 +490 + + + +journal article +29418 +10.11646/zootaxa.4482.3.2 +fd24ef18-76ac-46f1-aec2-2faf5b0ff325 +1175-5326 +1440707 +3FBE11E2-9F97-4A29-92A9-67780C782E0D + + + + + + +Key to species of the + +Parasesarma leptosoma + +species-complex + + + + + + + + + +1. Frontal margin nearly straight in dorsal view ( +Fig. 2A +); P3 and P4 relatively stout (merus length/width ratio approximately 2.4; propodus length/width ratio 4.1) ( +Fig. 1E +). ( +South +and +East Africa +)..................... + +P. leptosoma +( +Hilgendorf, 1869 +) + + + + + + +- Frontal margin concave in dorsal view (e.g. +Fig. 5A +); P3 and P4 relatively slender (merus length/width ratio more than 2.4; propodus length/width ratio more than. 4.1) (e.g. +Fig. 20A +).................................................... 2 + + + + + + + +2. P3 and P4 very slender (merus length/width ratio 3.1; propodus length/width ratio 5.9), dactylus very short (dactylus/propodus length ratio 0.3) ( +Fig. 20D +). ( +Papua +, +Indonesia +)................................................ + +P. gracilipes + + +n. sp. + + + + + + +- P3 and P4 broader (merus length/width ratio 2.5‾2.6; propodus length/width ratio 4.4‾4.8), dactylus relatively longer (dacty- lus/propodus length ratio c. 0.4) (e.g. +Fig. 20A +).............................................................. 3 + + + + + + +3. G1 apical process short (e.g. +Fig. 10E +)..................................................................... 4 + + + + +- G1 apical process long (e.g. +Fig. 5D +)...................................................................... 7 + + + + + + +4. Coxae of P3 and P4 with dense setae ( +Fig. 15E +). (Philippines).................................... + +P. parvulum + + +n. sp. + + + + + +- Coxae of P3 and P4 without dense setae (e.g. +Fig. 4B +)........................................................ 5 + + + + + + +5. Carapace 1.2 times broader than long ( +Fig. 13A +); consistently 9 tubercles on dactylus of male cheliped ( +Fig. 19F +). (Malaysia)..................................................................................... + +P. purpureum + + +n. sp. + + + + + +- Carapace 1.1 times broader than long (e.g. +Fig. 9A +); 9 or 10 tubercles on dactylus of male cheliped (e.g. +Fig. 20D +)........ 6 + + + + + + + +6. P3 and P4 about 1.8 times carapace width; G1 apical process slightly bent at angle of 60°, ending in truncated tip ( +Fig. 2L +). ( +Sulawesi +, +Indonesia +)............................................................ + +P. limbense +(Rathbun, 1914) + + + + + + + +- P2 and P3 about 1.6 times carapace width; G1 apical process bent at angle of 45°, ending in rounded tip ( +Fig. 10E +). ( +Taiwan) +............................................................................................ + +P. kui + + +n. sp. + + + + + + + + +7. Shape of frontal border in dorsal view distinctly concave ( +Fig. 8A +); 6–8 tubercles on dactylus of male cheliped ( +Fig. 19C +). (Taiwan and Philippines).................................................................... + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + + + + + +- Shape of frontal border in dorsal view slightly concave to straight (this state is not consistent with the couplet 1) (e.g. +Fig. 5A +); 9 or more tubercles on dactylus of male cheliped (e.g. +Fig. 19B +)................................................ 8 + + + + + + +8. Male cheliped dactylus with 9–15 ( +Fig. 19B +); P3 propodus not broader than P4 propodus ( +Fig. 20A +). ( +Japan +, +Guam +, +Fiji +and +Vanuatu +)................................................................................. + +P. gecko + + +n. sp. + + + + + + +- Male cheliped dactylus with 10–12 tubercles ( +Fig. 19H +); P3 propodus broader than P4 propodus ( +Fig. 20G +). ( +Sulawesi +, +Indonesia +)................................................................................. + +P. tarantula + + +n. sp. + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFBDFF9DD1CDFA1944CBFD8A.xml b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFBDFF9DD1CDFA1944CBFD8A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c170f4fb1b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/1B/376A1B4DFFBDFF9DD1CDFA1944CBFD8A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,290 @@ + + + +Identity of the tree-spider crab, Parasesarma leptosoma (Hilgendorf, 1869) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae), with descriptions of seven new species from the Western Pacific + + + +Author + +Li, Jheng-Jhang + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + + + +Author + +Ng, Peter K. L. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-09-19 + + +4482 + + +3 + + +451 +490 + + + +journal article +29418 +10.11646/zootaxa.4482.3.2 +fd24ef18-76ac-46f1-aec2-2faf5b0ff325 +1175-5326 +1440707 +3FBE11E2-9F97-4A29-92A9-67780C782E0D + + + + + + + +Parasesarma tarantula + +n. sp. + + + + +( +Figs. 17 +, +18 +, +19H +, +20G +, +21H +, +22E +, +23E +, +24F +) + + + + +Material examined. +HOLOTYPE: male (13.4× +11.5 mm +) (MZB Cru 4801), Sulawesi: Bitung, +2 April 2017 +, J.-J. Li +et al +. + +PARATYPES +: +3 males +(12.6× +10.9 mm +, 8.6× +7.6 mm +, 8.2×7.0 mm) ( +ZRC 2018.0801 +), same data as holotype + +.—2 males (9.6× +7.9 mm +, 6.7× +5.7 mm +), + +1 female +(11.9× +10.1 mm +) ( +MZB +Cru +4802), same data as holotype + +.— + +1 ovigerous female (11.2× +9.6 mm +) ( +ZRC 2018.0802 +), same data as holotype + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Carapace ( +Figs. 17A, F +, +18A +) squarish in general outline, 1.2 times broader than long; regions well defined, separated by shallow grooves; postfrontal region distinct, separated into 4 lobes by deep grooves; frontal margin slightly concaves in dorsal view; lateral margin straight, subparallel along most of length before curving to join almost straight posterior carapace margin; cornea extending or just reaching tip of external orbital tooth ( +Figs. 17A, F +, +18A +). Ischium of third maxilliped with shallow median sulcus, merus with distinct submedian ridge; exopod slender, tip reaching half-length of outer margin of merus, flagellum long. Male cheliped palm with 2 transverse pectinate crests (11 and 10 corneous teeth, distal and proximal crests, respectively) on upper surface; upper surface of dactylus with 10–12 symmetrical, obliquely elongate dactylar tubercles, proximal tubercles steep, sharp, other tubercles large, distalmost tubercle indistinct ( +Figs. 18C, D +, +19H +). Ambulatory legs relatively stout for this species-complex, P3 about 1.5 times carapace width; P3 and P4 coxae without dense setae; P3 merus 2.3 times as long as broad; P3 propodus 3.9 times as long as broad; P3 dactylus 0.5 times length of propodus ( +Fig. 20G +). G1 relatively slender ( +Figs. 18E–H +, +21H +); apical process corneous, short, bent at angle of 45°, long, stout, ending in rounded tip. G2 longer than quarter length of G1 ( +Fig. 17E +, +21H +). + + +Colour in life. +Similar to + +P. gecko + + +n. sp. + +, colour in general is dark brown. Carapace mottled dark and light brown, chelipeds brownish yellow, ambulatory legs light brown ( +Figs. 22E +, +23E +, +24F +). + + + + +FIGURE 17 +. + +Parasesarma tarantula + + +n. sp. + +. A–E, paratype male (12.6×10.9 mm) (ZRC 2018.0801), Sulawesi, Indonesia; F, G, paratype female (11.2×9.6 mm) (ZRC 2018.0802), same locality. A, F, dorsal views; B, E, G, ventral views; C, D, frontal views; E, close-up of gonopods. + + + + +Remarks. +The discovery of + +Parasesarma tarantula + + +n. sp. + +from Sulawesi is unexpected. The species was found in Bitung, a site very close to Lembeh Island, the +type +locality of + +P. limbense +. +Parasesarma limbense + +was found originally in Lembeh Island, but we were not found in Bitung, suggesting that the +types +may have been collected in a different microhabitat Having two species of a species-complex occurring nearby or even together is not without precedence: in +Taiwan +, + +P. kui + + +n. sp. + +and + +P. macaco + + +n. sp. + +also live sympatrically in some locations. + + + +Parasesarma tarantula + + +n. sp. + +most closely resembles + +P. gecko + + +n. sp. + +in the carapace shape and live colouration. It differs from all other members of the species-complex in having the P3 propodus distinctly shorter ( +Fig. 20G +). In addition, + +P. tarantula + +is easily separated from + +P. limbense + +by its prominently concave frontal margin, as well as its straight and elongated G1 ( +Figs. 18E–H +, +21H +). + + + + +Etymology. +The name is from the old Italian common name for large spiders, +tarantula +. The use of the name here alludes to the tree-climbing habits of the new species, similar to many species of +tarantula +, some of which are also found in Sulawesi. Used as a noun in apposition. + + + + +Distribution. +Only known from North Sulawesi, thus far. + + + + +Ecology. +In Sulawesi, + +Parasesarma tarantula + + +n. sp. + +is often observed climbing on mangrove trees and dead wood above the water. They can also found in tree holes near the water level. They are generally active during the daytime. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/69/376A693DFEAE668167621D3E870C7586.xml b/data/37/6A/69/376A693DFEAE668167621D3E870C7586.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ef5a68febd7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/69/376A693DFEAE668167621D3E870C7586.xml @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ + + + +Taxonomy and distribution of some katydids (OrthopteraTettigoniidae) from tropical Africa + + + +Author + +Massa, Bruno + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +524 + + +17 +44 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.524.5990 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.524.5990 +1313-2970-524-17 +B1F1F6385E5C48BA9B1573F4E94B5C0E + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Orthoptera Tettigoniidae + + + +Symmetrokarschia plana (Walker, 1869) +comb. n. +Figs 26-30 + + + + +Material +examined. + +South Africa, Kwa Zulu-Natal, Nhandla Forest, I.1937 (2♂) (ISAM). + + + +Remarks +. + + +Walker (1869) +described +Phaneroptera plana +from Kwa Zulu-Natal (South Africa). Later, +Kirby (1906) +transferred the taxon to the genus +Tylopsis +Fieber, and Ragge (1964) placed it in the genus +Symmetropleura +Brunner, 1878. Another species described by +Chopard (1955) +, +Catoptropteryx latipennis +from Cape Province, Tsitzikama forest, was synonymized by +Huxley (1970) +with +Symmetropleura plana +. The genus +Symmetropleura +was based on a Neotropical type-species, +Symmetropleura laevicauda +Brunner, 1878 and contained three further Neotropical and three African species. However, +Ragge (1968 +, +1980 +) pointed out that +Symmetropleura +is a New World genus, occurring in South America, Mexico and the Eastern USA, and that the African species are neither very similar to each other nor to the Neotropical type-species of the genus. Finally, +Massa (2015) +described two new genera for two African species: +Symmetrokarschia africana +(Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878) and +Symmetroraggea dirempta +(Karsch, 1889), but he was unable to examine specimens of the third species, +Symmetropleura plana +(Walker, 1869). Now, the availability of the above listed specimens allows to propose the change of the taxonomic status of this species. + + +Characters of the genus +Symmetropleura +are: fastigium of vertex triangular and sulcate; pronotum disc flat, with lateral excisions; tegmina wide with rounded hind margin or narrow with straight hind margin; fore and mid femora with ventral inner spines, hind femora with double row of ventral spines. Fore and mid tibiae dorsally unarmed or with some spinules; cerci long, in-curved and pointed; male sub-genital plate short with rounded posterior margin or (in +Symmetropleura africana +) long with triangular apex; styli absent; ovipositor longer than pronotum, not much curved, sharp, with upper and lower apices serrate; female sub-genital plate triangular, just concave. In the description +Brunner von Wattenwyl (1878) +referred mainly to +Symmetropleura laevicauda +, both within the text and in the figure 73; thus, by subsequent designation, +Kirby (1906) +established +Symmetropleura laevicauda +as the type-species of the genus. +Massa (2015) +transferred +Symmetropleura africana +to the genus +Symmetrokarschia +, on the basis of its peculiar characters: pronotum disc with regular impressed punctures, fastigium of vertex compressed, narrower than first antennal segment, sulcate above, eyes oval, prominent; absence of fronto-genal carinae; pronotum just depressed, fore part with just definite lateral carinae, central and hind parts with vague lateral carinae; fore margin slightly concave, posterior margin rounded; surface dotted, matt; fore coxae with a long spine, fore tibiae with open tympanum on each side, furrowed on upper border; fore and mid femora with 3-5 spines, hind femora with 5-8 inner ventral and 6-7 outer ventral spines; fore and mid tibiae with 1 dorsal and 1 ventral spur, hind tibiae with 3 apical spurs on each side; male tenth tergite laminate and protruding, with straight posterior margin, cerci little in-curved, with flat apex and pointed, sub-genital plate long, narrow, with obtuse and short cut apex, styli absent. Ovipositor well developed, sharply bent upwards near the base, shorter than pronotum, with upper border and apex of lower border finely serrate, sub-genital plate triangular and pointed. Tegmina wide and oval, with rounded hind border more pronounced in female than in male. + + +Characters +of +Symmetropleura plana +are testaceous-green, smooth, rather stout; head nearly as broad as the pronotum, with a short keel between eyes; front erect. Fastigium of vertex compressed, narrower than first antennal segment, sulcate above (Fig. 27). Eyes +tawny +, nearly round, rather prominent; absence of fronto-genal carinae. Disk of the pronotum flat, slightly widening hindward, with an abbreviated curved transverse line in middle; lateral keels just defined, each accompanied by an ochraceous line; fore margin slightly excavated; sides and hind margins slightly rounded, surface matt, characterized by a right and a left black spots on fore margin (Figs 26-27). Legs long, slender; fore coxae armed, fore tibiae with open tympanum on each side, furrowed on upper border. Fore tibiae with 6 inner + 1 spur and 7 outer spines + 1 spur on ventral margin, 3 outer spines + 1 spur on dorsal margin; mid tibiae with 8 inner + 1 spur and 10 outer spines + 1 spur on ventral margin, 2-3 inner and 7 outer spines + 1 spur on dorsal margin (on the whole both fore and mid tibiae have 1 dorsal and 2 ventral spurs); hind tibiae with 3 apical spurs on each side. Fore femora with 3-4 spines on each side of ventral margin, mid femora with 5 outer spines on ventral margin, unarmed on inner ventral margin. Hind femora with 3-4 small spines on each side of ventral margin. Fore wings rather narrow, with a ferrugineous streak along the anal vein and another nearer to base of hind margin (Fig. 26); interno-medial vein abruptly curved to the hind margin near tip; branch of externo-medial vein forked; veinlets very numerous, minute and irregular. Hind wings pellucid, longer than fore wings, green and with texture as in fore wings along apical part of costa; veins white. Male tenth tergite laminate with straight posterior margin (Fig. 29), cerci and lower appendages rounded at tips, nearly cylindrical, the former more curved than the latter, cerci very long, up-curved with flat and just pointed apex (Figs 28-29); sub-genital plate very long, narrow, with two very long appendices, just shorter than cerci; styli absent (Fig. 30). + + + +Figures 26-30. +Symmetrokarschia plana +comb. n. Lateral view of head, pronotum and tegmina of male (26); dorsal view of head and pronotum (27); lateral (28) and dorsal view (29) of cerci and appendices of male sub-genital plate; sub-genital plate of male and cerci (30). + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Differences from +Symmetrokarschia africana +are the absence of evident lateral carinae on metazona of pronotum, narrow tegmina, and fore and mid tibiae with 3 spurs. Considering the high variability of some characters found in other genera of African +Phaneropterinae +, it seems reasonable to consider also +Symmetrokarschia plana +as belonging to the genus +Symmetrokarschia +, and to exclude the genus +Symmetropleura +definitively from the African fauna. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/87/376A879BFFC8143EDE853F36FDCEF81C.xml b/data/37/6A/87/376A879BFFC8143EDE853F36FDCEF81C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4925ba969a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/87/376A879BFFC8143EDE853F36FDCEF81C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +A case of gynandromorphy in Ducetia japonica (Thunberg, 1815) (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae: Phaneropterinae) + + + +Author + +Huang, Jiang-Rong + + + +Author + +Liu, Yun-Fei +0000-0002-7370-7125 +School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China. & https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 7370 - 7125 + + + +Author + +He, Zhu-Qing +Museum of Biology, School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +2021-05-13 + + +4970 + + +1 + + +182 +188 + + + +journal article +6990 +10.11646/zootaxa.4970.1.10 +e438f726-ab1c-4eb2-9e35-7d1f354620d0 +1175-5326 +4755979 +65227D1B-EBB9-40D7-B203-F70CB32E2121 + + + + + + +Thorax + + + + +The left forewing and hind wing are shorter than the right one. The morphology of left forewing is as same as male’s, while that of right one as female’s ( +Fig. 2 +). Three left tibiae is brown in color, while those of right are yellow. + + + + +FIGURE 1 +. Gynandromorphy specimen (A, B), one male (C) and one female (D) in live. + + + + +FIGURE 2. +Head and forewing of gynandromorphy specimen. + + + + +Abdomen. +( +Fig. 3 +) + +In dorsal and lateral view, the color of abdomen is asymmetry in color. The color of left parts is brown with more small reddish spots. But in ventral view, no significant difference is found. The apex of left cercus is axe-like, longer than right one. The right cercus is short with conical apex. Epiproct is smaller on left, while larger on right. Two parts linked abnormally. Subgenital plate is as same as male’s on left, but curved outwards. On right, upper valve and lower valve is well developed. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/87/376A87F52748FF8E5BA1FB9C45C4FD4B.xml b/data/37/6A/87/376A87F52748FF8E5BA1FB9C45C4FD4B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0ad6e3c8da8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/87/376A87F52748FF8E5BA1FB9C45C4FD4B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,653 @@ + + + +Japanese species of the genus Proutia Tutt, 1899 (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) + + + +Author + +Saigusa, Toyohei +7 - 1 - 402 Baikoen 2 - chome, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka-shi 810 - 0035, Japan. E-mail: toyohei _ saigusa @ yahoo. co. jp + + + +Author + +Sugimoto, Mika +Kyushu University Museum, 10 - 1 Hakozaki 6 - chome, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka-shi 812 - 8581, Japan. E-mail: mksgmt 03 gi @ yahoo. co. jp Correspondence author + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2014 + +2014-09-30 + + +3869 + + +2 + + +143 +152 + + + +journal article +6087 +10.11646/zootaxa.3869.2.3 +fbc38e16-4a9a-45f7-979f-6dc20164cfe1 +1175-5326 +4947197 +8AE80644-6D1B-487B-BE9F-FF5AC1A3C37B + + + + + + + +Proutia maculatella +Saigusa et Sugimoto + +, +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 1 +, +2 +, +3A +, +4A +) + + + + + + +Proutia +sp. + +: + +Saigusa, 1992: 3–169 + +, 2 figs. + + + + + +Proutia +sp. + +: + +Saigusa and Sugimoto, 2013: 146–147 + +, pl. 3–14, figs 1, 2. + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Male: Large for the genus + +Proutia + +, with more or less semi-transparent apically rounded wings, forewing upperside greyish brown with indistinct greyish yellow speckles scattering on distal 1/2, and semi-transparent pale grey hindwing covered with hair-like upper scales. Female: Antenna long, more than 1.5 times head width; abdominal membrane light reddish brown. + + + + + +Description +. + +Male +( +Fig.1 +). Wing expanse +14.8–17.2 mm +. Coloration of vestiture. Head clothed with greyish brown hair-like scales. Dorsal surface of antennal shaft covered with greyish brown scales, mixed with greyish yellow ones on apical part and posterior surface of each flagellomere. Thoracic nota clothed with brown hair-like scales; abdomen clothed above with greyish brown hair-like scales, somewhat darker on anterior part. Legs covered with pale brown scales, mixed with yellowish grey ones on apical parts of tarsomeres. Forewing upperside. In well-reticulated specimens ( +Figs. 1A, 1C +), costal area and anterior 1/2 of discoidal cell brown, remaining area pale greyish yellow and reticulated with dark brown vein stripes and narrow transverse stripes; 3–4 transverse stripes present beyond discoidal cell, and width of stripes slightly wider than dark vein stripes; reticulation indistinct on basal 1/2 of wing. In darker specimens ( +Fig. 1B +), transverse stripes wider, as wide as or wider than yellowish speckles between stripes. Fringe uniformly brown. Hindwing upperside semitransparent brownish grey, vein lines brown; fringe brown, apical part of fringe on termen posterior to space 2 yellowish white.?Antenna ( +Fig. 1K +) slightly shorter than 1/2 length of forewing including fringe (0.40–0.45); flagellum bipectinated and consisting of 20–22 (M. 21.1) flagellomeres; pectination on 9th to 10th flagellomeres longest, +317–450 µ +(M. +390 µ +) long, 2.1–2.8 (M. 2.42) times as long as flagellomere; pectinations gradually elongated from basal flagellomeres to flagellomere 8, almost keeping maximum length until 10th, then gradually shortened towards antennal tip. Fore tibia with epiphysis, 0.36–0.57 (M. 0.51) times as long as fore tibia, arising from 0.34–0.46 (M. 0.41) length of tibia from base. + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Proutia maculatella + + +sp. nov +. + +A: male with well-reticulated forewings; B: male with obscurely maculated forewings; C: slide-mounted male wings; D: male genital right valva; E: male phallus; F: dorsal aspect of male genital dorsum; G: dorsal aspect of male genital anellus; H: upper scale of male forewing upperside; I: lower scale of male forewing upperside; J: upper scales (long ones) and two lower scales of male hindwing upperside; K: male left antenna, macerated. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Proutia maculatella + + +sp. nov +. + +A: female grasping lower end of its case in alive; B: copulation, female is concealed under male wings; C: male larval case with pupal exuviae. D: female preserved in 80% ethanol, somewhat faded in colour; E: female head, macerated; F: female forelegs, macerated; G: female midlegs, macerated; H: female hindlegs, macerated; I: head capsule of female pupa. + + + + +FIGURE 3. +Wing venation of + +Proutia +spp. + +males. A: + +Proutia maculatella + +s +p. nov +.; B: + +Proutia nigra + + +sp. nov +. + + + + + +FIGURE 4. +Lateral aspect of male genitalia of + +Proutia +spp. A + +: + +Proutia maculatella + +s +p. nov +.; B: + +Proutia nigra + + +sp. nov +. + + + + +Forewing +6.6–7.6 mm +(M. 7.0 mm) in length excluding fringe, 2.30–2.52 (M. 2.41) times as long as wide, with termen distinctly rounded; forewing length including fringe +7.4–8.7 mm +(M. +8.31 mm +); discoidal cell 0.68–0.74 (M. 0.71) times as long as forewing. Hindwing +5.2–5.9 mm +(M +5.5 mm +) long excluding fringe, 2.00–2.16 (M. 2.08) times as long as wide, with termen rounded; discoidal cell 0.54–0.59 (M. 0.57) times as long as hindwing. Forewing venation ( +Fig. 3A +): Accessory cell absent; intercalary cell present; forking point of vein M in discoidal cell at level of origin of vein CuA2 or at middle between origins of veins R1 and R2; bases of all veins from cell separated from each other. Hindwing venation ( +Fig. 3A +): Veins Rs and M1 usually separated, but occasionally connate or short-stalked; vein M in discoidal cell simple. + + +Wing vestiture. Forewing upperside covered with hair-like upper scales ( +Fig. 1 H +) (approximately +250–500µ +long, +10–20 µ +wide) and apically bidentate lower scales ( +Fig. 1I +) (approximately +40–70 µ +long, +10–15 µ +wide) on basal 1/3, apically bidentate upper scales (approximately +130–150 µ +long, +30–40 µ +wide) and bidentate lower scales (approximately +40–60 µ +long, +20 µ +wide) on apical 1/2 of discoidal cell, and mostly tridentate (occasionally bi- or quadridentate) upper scales (approximately +180–200 µ +long, +45–50 µ +wide, +15–20 µ +long of dentation) and bidentate lower scales (approximately +40–50 µ +long, +15–20 µ +wide) on apical 1/3 of wing. Measurement of slidemounted scales taken mainly from distal 2/3 of upperside of forewing as follows (larger upper scales and smaller lower scales were measured). Upper scales +145–180 µ +long (M +150 µ +), +48–54 µ +wide (M +44.5 µ +), with serrations +20–30 µ +(M +24 µ +); lower scales +60–85 µ +(M +66 µ +) long, +15–25 µ +wide (M +19.7 µ +), with serrations +10–15 µ +(M +11.8 µ +). Fringe consisting of long slender scales, scales very narrow on basal 2/3, widened subapically, and ending in pointed tip, with 2–3 small dentations on both lateral margins towards apex. Hindwing rather sparsely clothed with hair-like upper scales (approximately +220–290 µ +long, +7–10 µ +wide) and usually short bidentate (occasionally simple distally) lower scales (approximately +50–60 µ +long, +7–10 µ +wide) on almost whole surface; fringe of hindwing similar to forewing, but inner margin to basal part of outer margin almost hair-like. Hindwing with semitransparent appearance owing to covering of hair-like upper scales. + + +Male genitalia ( +Fig. 1D–G +, +4A +): Similar to those of + +P. betulina + +except as follows: ampulla (dorsal process) of valva ( +Fig. 1D +) longer and stouter, harpe (ventral process of valva) larger, saccus shorter, in lateral aspect dorsal part of ring (element of tegumen) ( +Fig. 5A +) wider; (compare illustrations of + +betulina + +in +Kozhantshikov (1956) +and dissected genitalia of one + +betulina + +specimen from Berlin). Relative length of ampulla to dorsal margin of valva (including ampulla and excluding transtilla) 0.48–0.52; ampulla 2.4–2.6 times as long as narrowest width; distal margin of dorsum ( +Fig. 1F +) weakly produced to pair of short, apically round projections; phallus (Fig. E) moderately curved without denticles on vesica; anellus ( +Fig. 1G +, valvae penis) bearing only fine setulae. + + + +Female +( +Figs. 2D–H +). + +Coloration. Sclerites including head, thorax, legs and abdominal terga and sterna dark brown. Head ( +Fig. 2E +) with pair of pale areas on vertex. Meso- and metanotum with dark dorsal and sublateral markings succeeding to markings of mature larvae. Membranous areas of abdomen light reddish brown owing to coloration of epidermal cells, but cuticula colorless. Abdomen sparsely clothed with light greyish brown fine hairlike scales; corethrogyne yellowish white. + + +Structure. Antenna (Fig. E) rather long for + +Proutia + +, +0.8–1.1 mm +long, 1.6–2.1 times as long as head width, flagellum usually well segmented into 12–14 flagellomeres, segmentation partly more or less incomplete in some specimens. Legs ( +Figs. 2F–H +) with tarsi divided into 3 tarsomeres in most cases, but into +4 in +some legs in a few specimens. + + +Distance from head to apical part of 7th abdominal segment in natural posture curving ventrally: +3.5–4.3 mm +. + + + + + +Type material +. + + + +HOLOTYPE + +♂ +, +Kashii +, +Fukoka-shi +, +Fukuoka Pref. +, +Kyushu +, +Japan +, + +April 16–18, 1970 + +, +T +. Saigusa. Donated to the Kyushu University Museum + +. + + +PARATYPES + +: +17♂ +( +1 ♂ +macerated, right wings venation on a slide), same locality as holotype, + +March 31 to April 5, 1958 + +, +T +. +Saigusa + +; + +4♂ +( +2♂ +macerated, right wings venation on slides), +Najima +, +Fukuoka-shi +, +Fukuoka Pref. +, +Kyushu +, +March +31 & + +April 14, 1958 + +, +T +. +Saigusa + +; + +15♂ +4♀ +( +2♂ +wings only; +♀ +in ethanol), same locality as holotype, + +April 10–16, 1970 + +, +T +. +Saigusa + +; +3♂ +(macerated, right wings venation on slides) + +26♀ +( +21♀ +in ethanol, +5♀ +macerated), +Sakato +, +Kasuya-machi +, +Fukuoka Pref. +, +Kyushu +, + +April 16, 2002 + +, +M. Sugimoto +& +T +. +Saigusa + +. + + + +Other material +. + + +2♂ +, +Zenkôji +, +Kôfu-shi +, +Yamanashi Pref. +, +Honshu +, + +April 20, 1957 + +, +T +. +Saigusa + +; + +6♂ +, same locality, + +April 14, 1958 + +, +T +. +Saigusa + +; + +4♂ +, +Kôfu-shi +, +Yamanasshi Pref. +, +Honshu +, + +April 10, 1958 + +, +T +. +Saigusa + +; + +♂ +, +Hanabusa +, +Higashiyatsushiro +, +Yamanashi Pref. +, +Honshu +, + +April 10, 1958 + +, +T +. +Saigusa + +; + +1♂ +, +Chiya-Ôgi +, +Okayama Pref. +, +Honshu +, + +April 27, 1998 + +, +T +. +Saigusa +& +M. Sugimoto + +; + +3♂ +, +Sanshûdai +, +Sobosan +, +Miyazaki Pref. +, +Kyushu +, + +May 24, 2005 + +, +T +. +Saigusa + +. + + +Type-locality +: Kashii, Fukuoka-shi, +Fukuoka Pref. +, Kyushu, +Japan +. + + + + + +Distribution +. + +Honshu, Kyushu. + + + + + +Remarks +. + +The male of + +Proutia maculatella + + +sp. nov. + +is easily distinguished from the known congeners by the ample maculated or reticulated forewings and semi-transparent hindwings covered with hair-like upper scales. The female of this species is distinctive in having light reddish brown abdominal membrane, and long, well segmented antennae consisting of more than 10 flagellomeres and yellowish white corethrogyne. The female of + +P. chinensis + +is reddish, but it has very short 6–7 segmented antennae ( +Hättenschwiler et Chao 1990 +). The pupal antenna ( +Fig. 2I +) is much longer than the head width. + + +The habitat of this species is grasslands along farm roads, railroads, forests, etc., in lowlands to mountain areas up to +1,500 m +altitude (Kanayama, Masutomi, +Yamanashi Pref. +). Adults appear in early spring from late March to April in lowlands of Kyushu. + + +The larvae certainly live near the ground and seem to hibernate as the final instar. The mature larvae fix their larval cases on stones, stakes, fences and walls of sheds, tree trunks, etc. in early spring. This species is univoltine. The larval case ( +Fig. 2C +) of mature larvae is covered with slender, longish pieces of herbaceous plants that are arranged longitudinally and some of them slightly exceeding posteriorly beyond the posterior tip of the case. In captivity larvae feed on pieces of wilted or moist dead leaves of several kinds of herbaceous plants such as + +Erigeron anuus + +. The female adult ( +Fig. 2A +) protrudes most of its body from the pupal case except for the apical part of the abdomen. Head of pupal exuviae ( +Fig. 2I +) and sometimes that of forelegs of the female are not shed, so that the female wears the pupal head cuticle as a mask. During copulation ( +Fig. 2B +) the male tightly holds the wings ventrally covering its mate. The eggs were laid inside the pupal exuviae in the pupal case. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/87/376A87F5274FFF815BA1FD044555FD03.xml b/data/37/6A/87/376A87F5274FFF815BA1FD044555FD03.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0301e1102c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/87/376A87F5274FFF815BA1FD044555FD03.xml @@ -0,0 +1,608 @@ + + + +Japanese species of the genus Proutia Tutt, 1899 (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) + + + +Author + +Saigusa, Toyohei +7 - 1 - 402 Baikoen 2 - chome, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka-shi 810 - 0035, Japan. E-mail: toyohei _ saigusa @ yahoo. co. jp + + + +Author + +Sugimoto, Mika +Kyushu University Museum, 10 - 1 Hakozaki 6 - chome, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka-shi 812 - 8581, Japan. E-mail: mksgmt 03 gi @ yahoo. co. jp Correspondence author + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2014 + +2014-09-30 + + +3869 + + +2 + + +143 +152 + + + +journal article +6087 +10.11646/zootaxa.3869.2.3 +fbc38e16-4a9a-45f7-979f-6dc20164cfe1 +1175-5326 +4947197 +8AE80644-6D1B-487B-BE9F-FF5AC1A3C37B + + + + + + + +Proutia nigra +Saigusa et Sugimoto + +, +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs. 3B +, +4B +, +5 +, +6 +) + + + + + +Diagnosis +. + +Male +: Median-sized species of + +Proutia + +, with pointed narrow wings, forewing upperside blackish brown to dark brown, without markings. Female: Antenna very short, nearly as long as width of head; abdominal membrane light beige in colour. + + + + + +Description +. + +Male ( +Fig. 2 +): Wing expanse 10.4– +1.30 mm +. Coloration of vestiture. Head clothed with blackish to dark brown hair-like scales, mixed with a few greyish ones in front. Dorsal surface of antennal shaft covered with dark brown scales mixing a few greyish yellow scales on posterior margin of basal 1/2 and occasionally on apex of each flagellomere. Thoracic nota and abdominal terga clothed with dark brown more or less broad hair-like scales. Legs covered with dark brown scales, mixing somewhat paler ones at tips of tarsomeres and spurs of mid and hind legs. Forewing ( +Fig. 5B +) upperside uniformly brownish black in fresh specimens, dark to blackish brown in aged specimens. Hindwing ( +Fig. 5B +) upperside slightly lighter than forewing. Fringe of both wings uniformly dark brown. + + +Antenna ( +Fig. 5I +) slightly shorter than forewing including fringe (0.43–0.46); flagellum bipectinated and consisting of 17–19 (M. 18 n=10) flagellomeres; pectination on 7th flagellomere longest, +350–400µ +(M. +374 µ +) long, and 2.0–2.75 times as long as flagellomere; pectinations abruptly becoming longer to 7th flagellomere, then strongly decreasing in length towards distal flagellomere. Fore tibia with epiphysis 0.57–0.69 (M. 0.65) times as long as fore tibia, arising from 0.29–0.45 (M. 0.36) length of tibia from base. + + +Forewing +4.2–5.2 mm +(M. +4.9 mm +) in length excluding fringe, 2.15–2.41 (M. 2.31) times as long as wide, with termen distinctly produced; forewing length including fringe 5.2–6.2 (M. 5.64) mm; discoidal cell 0.66–0.72 (M. 0.69) times as long as forewing. Hindwing 3.2–3.9 (M. 3.7) mm long excluding fringe, 1.94–2.22 (M. 2.08) times as long as wide, with termen distinctly produced and roundly pointed; discoidal cell 0/66–0.72 (M. 0.69) times as long as hindwing. Forewing venation ( +Fig. 3B +): Accessory cell absent; intercalary cell present and long; forking point of vein M in discoidal cell usually at level between origins of veins R1 and R2; bases of all veins from cell separated from each other. Hindwing venation ( +Fig. 3B +): Veins Rs and M1 usually separated, but rarely connate; vein M in discoidal cell simple. + + +Wing vestiture. Forewing upperside covered with broad upper scales +130–160 µ +(M. +150 µ +) long, +30–40 µ +(M. +34 µ +) wide, distal margin of most scales usually with 4 serrations, occasionally 3 or 5, length of dentation usually slightly longer than +10 µ +; lower scales of upperside of forewing +55–85 µ +(M. +68 µ +) long, +14–23 µ +(M. +20 µ +) wide, distal margin of most of scales usually with 3 serrations +3–10 µ +in length. Hindwing upperside covered with broad upper scales +110–180 µ +(M. +152 µ +) long, +15–25 µ +(M. +20 µ +) wide, distal margin of most scales usually with 2 serrations, occasionally simple, length of dentation +5–10 µ +; lower scales of upperside of forewing +50–75 µ +(M. +62 µ +) long, +10–17 µ +(M. +14 µ +) wide, distal margin of most of scales with 2 serrations +3–8 µ +in length. + + +Male genitalia ( +Figs 5 C–F +, +4B +): Similar to preceding species, ampulla of valva ( +Fig. 5E +) longer and more slender. Relative length of ampulla to dorsal margin of valva (including ampulla and excluding transtilla) 0.56–0.75; ampulla 4.2–4.3 times as long as narrowest width; distal margin of dorsum ( +Fig. 5C +) weakly produced with shallow median notch; phallus ( +Fig. 5 F +) rather strongly curved ventrally without denticles of vesica; anellus ( +Fig. 5 D +) bearing only fine setulae. + + +Female ( +Figs 6A–E +). Coloration. Sclerites of head, thorax and legs light yellowish brown, abdominal terga and sterna brown, slightly lighter than + +P. maculatella + +sp. nov. +. Meso- and metanotum with irregular darker dorsal and sublateral markings succeeding to markings of mature larvae. Membranous areas of abdomen light beige in colour, much paler than + +P +. +maculatella + +sp. nov +.. Abdomen sparsely clothed with light greyish brown fine hair-like scales. Corethrogyne yellowish white. + + +Structure. Antenna ( +Fig. 6B +) short, +350–580 µ +long, 0.8–1.3 times as long as head width. Flagellum indistinctly divided into 4–7 flagellomeres. Legs. ( +Figs. 6C–E +) with tarsi divided into 3 tarsomeres, occasionally mid and hind tarsi into 4 and 5 respectively; fore leg not much short as in + +P. chinensis + +. + + +Distance from head to apical part of abdominal segment +7 in +natural posture curving ventrally: +3.1–4.3 mm +. + + + + +FIGURE 5. + +Proutia nigra + + +sp +. +nov +. + +A: male; B: slide-mounted male wings; C: dorsal aspect of male genital dorsum; D: dorsal aspect of male genital anellus; E: male right genital valva; F: male phallus; G: upper (larger) and lower (smaller) scales of upperside of forewing; H: upper (larger) and lower (smaller) scales of upperside of hind wing; I: male left antenna, macerated. + + + + +FIGURE 6. +A: + +Proutia nigra + +s +p. nov +. A: Female preserved in 80% ethanol; B: female head, macerated; C: female forelegs, macerated; D: female midlegs, macerated; E: female hindlegs, macerated; F: head capsule of female pupa; G: male larval case with pupal exuviae. + + + + + +Type material +. + + + +HOLOTYPE + +♂ +(with pupal case and exuviae), +Innakiyama +, +Miyawaka-shi +, +Fukuoka Pref. +, +Kyushu +, +Japan +, + +May 12, 1969 + +, +T +. Saigusa. Donated to the Kyushu University Museum + +. + + +PARATYPES + +(most +paratypes +with pupal case and exuviae): +1♂ +, same locality as holotype, + +May 10, 1958 + +, +T +. Saigusa + +; + +3♂ +, same locality, + +May 3–8, 1961 + +, +T +. Saigusa + +; + +7♂ +( +1♂ +macerated and right wing venation on a slide), same locality, + +May 9–14, 1967 + +, +T +. Saigusa + +; + +1♂ +, same data as holotype + +; + +1♂ +(only wings on a slide), same locality, + +May 19, 1970 + +, +T +. Saigusa + +; + +1♂ +(macerated and right wings and left wings venation on slides), same locality, + +May 25, 1970 + +, +T +. Saigusa + +; + +1♂ +(only wings on slide), + +May 14, 1971 + +, +T +. Saigusa + +; +9♂ +( +1♂ +macerated and right wing venation on slide, + +1♂ +(only wings on a slide), same locality, + +May 13–19, 1972 + +, +T +. Saigusa + +; + +3♂ +(each macerated and right wings on a slide), same locality, + +May 22, 1999 + +, +T +. Saigusa + +; + +9♀ +(in ethanol), same locality, + +May 3–22, 1999 + +, +T +. Saigusa + +; + +8♀ +(in ethanol), same locality, + +May 5–8, 2000 + +, +T +. Saigusa + +. + + + + +Type +locality + +: +Innakiyama +(Inunakiyama), +Miyawaka-shi +, +Fukuoka Pref. +, +Kyushu +, +Japan + +. + + + + + +Distribution +. + +Kyushu. + + + + + +Remarks +. + +The male of + +P. nigra + + +sp. nov. + +most resembles that of + +P. betulina + +, but differs from the latter in more strongly pointed wings, especially hindwings, and the wide tegumen and longer ampulla and harpe of the genitalia. The female of the new species differs from + +betulina + +in strongly shortened antennae and the yellowish white corethrogyne, that is snow-white (silver, silverweiss) in + +betulina + +( +Meyrick 1927 +; +Kozhantshikov 1956 +; +Hättenschwiler 1985 +). The covering of larval case of + +betulina + +is different from that of the new species, and consists of short broad pieces of plant material, such as bark, pine-needles, grass and lichen ( +Hättenschwiler 1985 +; +Hättenschwiler et Chao 1990 +). + +Proutia nigra + + +sp. nov. + +also differs from + +P. breviserrata + +, + +P. norvegica + +and + +P. rotunda + +in its pointed wings. The valva of + +P. breviserrata + +is more slender than that of + +nigra + +. + +Proutia norvegica + +has light brown wings. The larval case of + +P. rotunda + +is somewhat similar to + +P. betulina + +, and consequently quite different from that of + +P. nigra + + +sp. nov. + +( +Palmqvist 2008 +). The Chinese + +P. chinensis + +is similar to + +P. nigra + + +sp. nov. + +in uniformly dark forewings, but the former has flagellomere pectinations much longer than + +P. nigra + + +sp. nov. + +in proportion to flagellomeres, and has no distinctive intercalary cell in the forewing discoidal cell ( +Hättenschwiler et Chao 1990 +). The female of + +P. chinensis + +resembles + +P. nigra + + +sp. nov. + +female in the abbreviated antennae, but it differs from + +P. nigra + + +sp. nov. + +in extremely shorter forelegs in proportion to the mid and hind legs ( +Hättenschwiler et Chao 1990 +). + + +The habitat of this species was found in evergreen forests and Japanese cedar plantations ( + +Cryptomeria japonica + +), but not in open grasslands, the main habitat of + +P. maculatella + + +sp. nov. + +The +type +locality is in the low mountain zone about +400 m +in altitude. The species was not found in lowlands in northern Kyushu. Adults appear in late April to mid May. + + +The mature larvae fix their pupation cases on fences, walls of deserted sheds, tree trunks, etc in forests in mid spring. This species seems to be univoltine, but this has not been confirmed by breeding. The larval case ( +Fig. 6G +) is similar to that of + +P. maculatella + + +sp. nov. + +, however its covering consists of needles of Japanese cedar and other material found on the forest floor, not of narrow pieces of herbaceous plants attached to cases of + +P. maculatella + + +sp. nov. + +Head ( +Fig. 6F +) and forelegs of pupal exuviae of females are not shed, so that females wear the pupal head cuticle as a mask and the forelegs can not grasp the posterior end of the pupation case. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6A/B6/376AB66226FFDEC0BD93F248E3E77721.xml b/data/37/6A/B6/376AB66226FFDEC0BD93F248E3E77721.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f9215b07e15 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6A/B6/376AB66226FFDEC0BD93F248E3E77721.xml @@ -0,0 +1,711 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Juncaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/juncaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Juncus tenageia +L. f. + + + + + +Schlamm-Binse + + + + +Art ISFS: 219900 Checklist: 1025100 +Juncaceae +Juncus +Juncus tenageia L. f. + + + +Bestimmungsschluessel + + + +Zusammenfassung + + + + +Artbeschreibung + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: + +5-30 cm +hoch, +bueschelig-aufrecht + +. +Staengel +weniger als +1 mm +dick, +beblaettert +. +Blaetter +borstenfoermig +, + +Blattscheiden an der +Muendung +mit hochgezogenen +Oehrchen +. +Bluetenstand +locker, reich verzweigt, mit vielen, 0,5- +2 cm +voneinander entfernten, meist einzelnen +Blueten +. +Perigonblaetter +eilanzettlich, 2-2,5 mm lang, +braeunlich + +, mit +haeutigem +Rand, spitz, der Frucht anliegend. Diese fast kugelig, etwa so lang wie die +Perigonblaetter +. + + + + +Bluetezeit + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: 6-8 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: Schlammige Ufer, feuchte Lehm- und +Sandboeden +/ kollin / +Suedliches +TI + + + + +Verbreitung global + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: +Westeuropaeisch-mediterran + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte + +(nach +Landolt & al. 2010 +) + +4w + 23-34 + 2.t.2n=? + + + +Status + + + +Status IUCN +: Vom Aussterben bedroht + + + + +Nationale +Prioritaet +: 2 - Hohe nationale +Prioritaet + + +Internationale Verantwortung +: 1 - Gering Erhalten/ +Foerdern +Gefaehrdungen +Datendefizit, zurzeit keine bekannten Vorkommen Verwechslung mit anderen Juncus-Arten +Zerstoerung +des Lebensraums Anatomie + + +Zusammenfassung der Stammanatomie + + +Umriss rund oder oval. +Leitbuendel +in einer Reihe. Epidermiszellen aussen verholzt. + + +Beschreibung (Englisch) + + +Culm-diameter +0.5-1 mm +, center full, radius of culm in relation to wall thickness 1:1. Outline circular with a smooth surface. Culm-center full, containing unlignified cells. Without cortex/cylinder separation. Epidermis smooth. Epidermis thin-, peripheral thicker-walled (lignified). Large vascular bundles arranged in one peripheral row. Chlorenchyma present, continuous peripheral belt with unlignified round cells (like a large cortex). Sclerenchyma belt in a wavy, continuous belt centripetal of the chlorenchyma. Vascular bundles collateral closed. Sclerenchymatic sheath around vascular bundles circular large, 3 to x cells. Vessels arrangement in vascular bundles in lateral position. Largest vessel in the bundle small, <20 +μm +. Distinct cavities (intercellulars) in the protoxylem area of vascular bundles. + + + +Oekologie + + +Lebensform Therophyt + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + + +2.5.1 - +Einjaehrige +Schlammflur (Zwergbinsenflur) ( +Nanocyperion +) + + + +
+
+ + + +fett + +Dominante Art, welche das Aussehen des Lebensraumes +mitpraegt + +Charakterart +Weniger strikt an den Lebensraum gebundene Art + + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F +sehr feucht; Feuchtigkeit stark wechselnd (mehr als ++/- +2 Stufen) +Lichtzahl LhalbschattigSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rsauer (pH 3.5-6.5)Temperaturzahl Twarm-kollin
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +maessig +naehrstoffarm +bis +maessig +naehrstoffreich + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subozeanisch (hohe Luftfeuchtigkeit, geringe Temperaturschwankungen, eher milde Winter)
+ + + + +Abhaengigkeit +vom Wasser + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Fluesse +0 - unbedeutend, keine Bindung.
Ruhiges Wasser2 - Schwerpunktlebensraum
Grundwasser0 - unbedeutend, keine Bindung.
+ + +Nomenklatur + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Juncus tenageia +L. f. + + + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Schlamm-Binse +, +Sand-Binse +Nom +francais +: +Jonc des marais +Nome italiano: +Giunco delle pozze + + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Juncus tenageia L. f. + + +Checklist 2017 + +219900
= +Juncus tenageia L. f. + + +Flora Helvetica 2001 + +2443
= +Juncus tenageia L. f. + + +Flora Helvetica 2012 + +2615
= +Juncus tenageia L. f. + + +Flora Helvetica 2018 + +2615
= +Juncus tenageia L. f. + + +Index synonymique 1996 + +219900
= +Juncus tenageia L. f. + + +Landolt 1977 + +580
= +Juncus tenageia L. f. + + +Landolt 1991 + +509
= +Juncus tenageia L. f. + + +SISF/ISFS 2 + +219900
= +Juncus tenageia L. f. + + +Welten & Sutter 1982 + +2146
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Status Indigenat +: Indigen + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein + + +Status Rote Liste national 2016 + + +Status IUCN +: Vom Aussterben bedroht + + + +Zusaetzliche +Informationen + +Kriterien IUCN: B1ab(iii); B2ab(iii) + + +Status Rote Liste regional 2019 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Biogeografische RegionenStatusKriterien IUCN
Jura (JU)--
Mittelland (MP)regional beziehungsweise in der Schweiz ausgestorben (Regionally Extinct)
Alpennordflanke (NA)--
+Alpensuedflanke +(SA) +vom Aussterben bedroht (Critically Endangered)B1ab(iii); B2ab(iii)
+Oestliche +Zentralalpen (EA) +--
Westliche Zentralalpen (WA)--
+ + + +Status nationale +Prioritaet +/Verantwortung + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ +Nationale +Prioritaet + + +2 - Hohe nationale +Prioritaet +
+Massnahmenbedarf +2 - Klarer Massnahmebedarf
+ +Internationale Verantwortung + +1 - Gering
+ +Ueberwachung +Bestaende + + +2 - +Ueberwachung +ist +noetig +
+ +Schutzstatus + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+International (Berner Konvention) +Nein
+TI + +Vollstaendig +geschuetzt +(23.01.2013)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Schweiz +--
+GE + +Vollstaendig +geschuetzt +(25.07.2007)
+ +Status in sektoriellen Umweltpolitiken + + + + + + + +
+Umweltziele Landwirtschaft: +Z - Zielartweitere Informationen
+ + + + +Erhalten/ +Foerdern +Gefaehrdungen +und Massnahmen Datendefizit, zurzeit keine bekannten Vorkommen Aktive Suche nach Populationen Alte Fundstellen +schuetzen +und +regelmaessig +ueberpruefen +Bei Wiederauftauchen Ex-situ-Vermehrungen +durchfuehren +und unbedingt +schuetzen +Verwechslung mit anderen Juncus-Arten Besondere Aufmerksamkeit +fuer +die Gattung +Juncus +foerdern +. In den entsprechenden Habitaten nach der Art suchen +Zerstoerung +des Lebensraums +Foerderung +des Nanocyperions, insbeondere in Gebieten, in denen +Juncus tenageia +frueher +bekannt war + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/0E/376B0E7F8663759B41F72083F04B25BA.xml b/data/37/6B/0E/376B0E7F8663759B41F72083F04B25BA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3a05ee91312 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/0E/376B0E7F8663759B41F72083F04B25BA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Tribe +Bacaniini Kryzhanovskij, 1976 + + + + +*Bacaniini +Vienna, 1974: 273 [stem: Bacani-]. Type genus: +Bacanius +J. L. LeConte, 1853. Comment: unavailable name (Art. 13.1): proposed after 1930 without description or bibliographic reference to such a description. + + +Bacaniini +Kryzhanovskij, 1976: 266 [stem: Bacani-]. Type genus: +Bacanius +J. L. LeConte, 1853. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/36/376B3685F39DFD6A73DD0E7738A5CFE6.xml b/data/37/6B/36/376B3685F39DFD6A73DD0E7738A5CFE6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..954eca80fac --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/36/376B3685F39DFD6A73DD0E7738A5CFE6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Platygastroidea + + + +Author + +Buhl, Peter N. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Notton, David G. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +7991 +7991 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7991 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7991 +1314-2828--7991 + + + + + +Idris +Foerster +, 1856 + + + + + +ACOLOIDES +Howard, 1890 + + +CERATOBAEUS +Ashmead, 1893 + + +PSEUDOBAEUS +Perkins, 1910 + + +DISSACOLUS +Kieffer, 1926 + + +MEGACOLUS +Priesner, 1951 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/46/376B46E5F723A1E45782F16BBBE9FF84.xml b/data/37/6B/46/376B46E5F723A1E45782F16BBBE9FF84.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..37707e296d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/46/376B46E5F723A1E45782F16BBBE9FF84.xml @@ -0,0 +1,546 @@ + + + +Aquatic Insects from the Caatinga: checklists and diversity assessments of Ubajara (Ceara State) and Sete Cidades (Piaui State) National Parks, Northeastern Brazil + + + +Author + +Takiya, Daniela Maeda + + + +Author + +Santos, Allan Paulo Moreira + + + +Author + +Pinto, Angelo Parise + + + +Author + +Henriques-Oliveira, Ana Lucia + + + +Author + +Carvalho, Alcimar do Lago + + + +Author + +Sampaio, Brunno Henrique Lanzellotti + + + +Author + +Clarkson, Bruno + + + +Author + +Moreira, Felipe Ferraz Figueiredo + + + +Author + +Avelino-Capistrano, Fernanda + + + +Author + +Goncalves, Ines Correa + + + +Author + +Cordeiro, Isabelle da Rocha Silva + + + +Author + +Camara, Josenir Teixeira + + + +Author + +Barbosa, Julianna Freires + + + +Author + +de Souza, W. Rafael Maciel + + + +Author + +Rafael, Jose Albertino + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8354 +8354 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8354 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8354 +1314-2828--8354 + + + + +Alisotrichia sp. 2 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Rafael, J.A. | Limeira-de-Oliveira, F. | Takiya, D.M. | Santos, A.P.M. | et al. +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Ceara +; municipality: Ubajara; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Ubajara, Rio das Minas, +proximo +ao +Portao +Araticum + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 328; verbatimCoordinates: +3°49'32.6"S +, +40°53'32.8"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise intercept trap +; verbatimEventDate: +17.ii.13 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Rafael, J.A. | Limeira-de-Oliveira, F. | Takiya, D.M. | et al. +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Ceara +; municipality: Ubajara; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Ubajara, Trilha Araticum, Rio das Minas na altura da trilha do +teleferico + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 420; verbatimCoordinates: +3°49'58"S +, +40°53'53"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise intercept trap +; verbatimEventDate: +20.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Rafael, J.A. | Limeira-de-Oliveira, F. | Takiya, D.M. | et al. +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +female +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Ceara +; municipality: Ubajara; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Ubajara, Trilha Araticum, Rio das Minas na altura da trilha do +teleferico + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 420; verbatimCoordinates: +3°49'58"S +, +40°53'53"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise intercept trap +; verbatimEventDate: +20.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Rafael, J.A. | Limeira-de-Oliveira, F. | Takiya, D.M. | et al. +; individualCount: +11 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Ceara +; municipality: Ubajara; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Ubajara, Trilha Araticum, Rio das Minas na altura da trilha do +teleferico + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 420; verbatimCoordinates: +3°49'58"S +, +40°53'53"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise intercept trap +; verbatimEventDate: +20.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Rafael, J.A. | Limeira-de-Oliveira, F. | Takiya, D.M. | et al. +; individualCount: +18 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Ceara +; municipality: Ubajara; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Ubajara, Trilha Araticum, Rio das Minas na altura da trilha do +teleferico + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 420; verbatimCoordinates: +3°49'58"S +, +40°53'53"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise intercept trap +; verbatimEventDate: +20.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Rafael, J.A. | Limeira-de-Oliveira, F. | Takiya, D.M. | et al. +; individualCount: +25 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Ceara +; municipality: Ubajara; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Ubajara, Trilha Araticum, Rio das Minas na altura da trilha do +teleferico + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 420; verbatimCoordinates: +3°49'58"S +, +40°53'53"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise intercept trap +; verbatimEventDate: +20.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Rafael, J.A. | Limeira-de-Oliveira, F. | Takiya, D.M. | et al. +; individualCount: +27 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Ceara +; municipality: Ubajara; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Ubajara, Trilha Araticum, Rio das Minas na altura da trilha do +teleferico + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 420; verbatimCoordinates: +3°49'58"S +, +40°53'53"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise intercept trap +; verbatimEventDate: +20.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Rafael, J.A. | Limeira-de-Oliveira, F. | Takiya, D.M. | et al. +; individualCount: +79 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Ceara +; municipality: Ubajara; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Ubajara, Trilha Araticum, Rio das Minas na altura da trilha do +teleferico + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 420; verbatimCoordinates: +3°49'58"S +, +40°53'53"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise intercept trap +; verbatimEventDate: +20.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Limeira-de-Oliveira | et al. +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Ceara +; municipality: Ubajara; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Ubajara, Trilha Araticum, Rio das Minas na altura da trilha do +teleferico + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 420; verbatimCoordinates: +3°49'58"S +, +40°53'53"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise intercept trap +; verbatimEventDate: +21.v.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Limeira-de-Oliveira | et al. +; individualCount: +7 +; sex: +female +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Ceara +; municipality: Ubajara; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Ubajara, Trilha Araticum, Rio das Minas na altura da trilha do +teleferico + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 420; verbatimCoordinates: +3°49'58"S +, +40°53'53"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise intercept trap +; verbatimEventDate: +21.v.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Rafael, J.A. | Limeira-de-Oliveira, F. | Takiya, D.M. | et al. +; individualCount: +2 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Ceara +; municipality: Ubajara; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Ubajara, Trilha Araticum, Rio das Minas na altura da trilha do +teleferico + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 420; verbatimCoordinates: +3°49'58"S +, +40°53'53"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise intercept trap +; verbatimEventDate: +20.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Rafael, J.A. | Limeira-de-Oliveira, F. | Takiya, D.M. | et al. +; individualCount: +6 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Ceara +; municipality: Ubajara; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Ubajara, Trilha Araticum, Rio das Minas na altura da trilha do +teleferico + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 420; verbatimCoordinates: +3°49'58"S +, +40°53'53"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Malaise intercept trap +; verbatimEventDate: +20.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Notes +Undescribed species. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/4C/376B4C57EAB4E669DCC1962D052E2375.xml b/data/37/6B/4C/376B4C57EAB4E669DCC1962D052E2375.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4e8d9c37db4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/4C/376B4C57EAB4E669DCC1962D052E2375.xml @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ + + + +A first checklist of the Pteridophytes of Togo (West Africa) + + + +Author + +Abotsi, Komla Elikplim + + + +Author + +Kokou, Kouami + + + +Author + +Dubuisson, Jean-Yves + + + +Author + +Rouhan, Germinal + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2018 + +6 + + +24137 +24137 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e24137 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e24137 +1314-2828-6-24137 + + + + +Pteris burtonii Baker + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordNumber: AB0107; recordedBy: +Abotsi, K.E. +; Taxon: scientificName: Pteris burtonii Baker; namePublishedIn: Ann. Bot. 5: 218 (1891); kingdom: Plantae; phylum: Pteridophyta; class: Polypodiopsida; order: Polypodiales; family: Pteridaceae; genus: Pteris; specificEpithet: burtonii; scientificNameAuthorship: Baker; Location: continent: Africa; country: +Togo +; countryCode: TG; locality: + +Danyi +N'Digbe + +; verbatimElevation: +688 +; verbatimSRS: WGS84; decimalLatitude: +7.150935 +; decimalLongitude: +0.67243 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Abotsi, K.E. +; dateIdentified: 06-27-16; Event: eventDate: +06-27-16 +; habitat: Rainforest; Record Level: institutionID: Herbarium Togoense; collectionID: Abotsi, K.E.; institutionCode: +TOGO +; basisOfRecord: Preserved specimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordNumber: AB0326; recordedBy: +Abotsi, K.E. +; Taxon: scientificName: Pteris burtonii Baker; namePublishedIn: Ann. Bot. 5: 218 (1891); kingdom: Plantae; phylum: Pteridophyta; class: Polypodiopsida; order: Polypodiales; family: Pteridaceae; genus: Pteris; specificEpithet: burtonii; scientificNameAuthorship: Baker; Location: continent: Africa; country: +Togo +; countryCode: TG; locality: +Assoukoko +; verbatimElevation: +342 +; verbatimSRS: WGS84; decimalLatitude: +8.00328 +; decimalLongitude: +0.61336 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Abotsi, K.E. +; dateIdentified: 09-18-16; Event: eventDate: +09-18-16 +; habitat: Rainforest; Record Level: institutionID: Herbarium Togoense; collectionID: Abotsi, K.E.; institutionCode: +TOGO +; basisOfRecord: Preserved specimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordNumber: AB0415; recordedBy: +Abotsi, K.E. +; Taxon: scientificName: Pteris burtonii Baker; namePublishedIn: Ann. Bot. 5: 218 (1891); kingdom: Plantae; phylum: Pteridophyta; class: Polypodiopsida; order: Polypodiales; family: Pteridaceae; genus: Pteris; specificEpithet: burtonii; scientificNameAuthorship: Baker; Location: continent: Africa; country: +Togo +; countryCode: TG; locality: + +Danyi +Dzogbegan + +; verbatimElevation: +712 +; verbatimSRS: WGS84; decimalLatitude: +7.232315 +; decimalLongitude: +0.677387 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: +Abotsi, K.E. +; dateIdentified: 12-27-16; Event: eventDate: +12-27-16 +; habitat: Rainforest; Record Level: institutionID: Herbarium Togoense; collectionID: Abotsi, K.E.; institutionCode: +TOGO +; basisOfRecord: Preserved specimen + + + + +Ecological interactions + +Native status +Native + + + +Distribution +Zone 4 + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFC1FFE3FF745373A36CF888.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFC1FFE3FF745373A36CF888.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..190ff62681f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFC1FFE3FF745373A36CF888.xml @@ -0,0 +1,452 @@ + + + +Revision and cladistic analysis of the jumping spider genus Onomastus (Araneae: Salticidae) + + + +Author + +Benjamin, Suresh P. + +text + + +Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society + + +2010 + +2010-06-30 + + +159 + + +3 + + +711 +745 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00580.x + +journal article +10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00580.x +0024-4082 +10114688 + + + + + +ONOMASTUS PETHIYAGODAI + +SP. NOV. + + + + + + +( +FIGS 18A–F +, +19A–F +, +20A–E +, +21A–D +, +22A–B +) + + + + +Holotype +: + +1♂ +, +Sri Lanka +: +Central Province +, +Nuwara Eliya District +, +Agrapathana +, +Agrabopath forest +, + +1100 m + +, + +08.iii.2000 + +. Deposited in MHNG. + + + + +Paratype +: + +3♀ +, label data as above. Deposited in MHNG. + + +Diagnosis: +Males of + +O. pethiyagodai + +are readily separated from that of + +O. patellari + +s and + +O. indra + +by the absence of TA2. Separated from + +O. complexipalpis + +, + +O. kanoi + +, + +O. kaharian + +, and + +O. nigrimaculatus + +by the presence of a filiform conductor. + +O. pethiyagodai + +is most closely related to + +O. quinquenotatus + +, and may be separated by the shape of the conductor and MA ( +Figs 19E +, +20D +, +22A +). Females are difficult to diagnose, but may be separated by details of internal genitalia. + + +REVISION AND CLADISTICS OF + +ONOMASTUS + +735 + + + +Figure 19. +Scanning electron micrographs of + + +Onomastus pethiyagodai + +sp. nov. + +from Agrapathana, Sri Lanka (MHNG). A, D, left male palp, prolateral view. B, E, ditto, ventral view. C, F, ditto, retrolateral view. Abbreviations: C, conductor; E, embolus; MA, median apophysis; MAP, mesal branch of MA; PA, patella apophysis; TA1, tegular apophysis 1; TA3, tegular apophysis 3. Scale bars = 20 Mm (A, D, E, F), 30 Mm (B, C). + + + + +Figure 20. +Scanning electron micrographs of + + +Onomastus pethiyagodai + +sp. nov. + +from Agrapathana, Sri Lanka (MHNG). A, MA, prolateral view. B, PA, retrolateral view. C, ditto, ventral view. D, MA, ventral view. E, C and E prolateral view. Scale bars = 10 Mm (B, C, D), 20 Mm (A, E). + + + + +Male +holotype +: + +Total length: 2.9; prosoma length: 1.5, width: 1.1. Leg I: femur 1.4, patella 0.2, tibia 1.2, metatarsus 1.0, tarsus 0.4. The spiders are green in nature. They turn whitish to pale yellow in alcohol. Prosoma oval, longer than wide. Opisthosoma longer than wide, lighter in colour. Leg I yellowish brown, leg II–IV light yellow. Legs are laterally marked with dark black blobs. All eyes except AME surrounded by dark rings. Chelicerae with pro- and retromarginal teeth, number not examined. Leg formula 4132. Leg spination: metatarsus V 4-2-2; tibia P 1-0-0, V 2-4-2, R 1-0-0; patella V 2-0-0; femur D 0-1-1, P 0-0-1, R 0-0-1. Palp as in +Figures 19A–F +, +20A–E +, +22A–B +. + + + +Female +paratype +: + +Total length: 2.9; prosoma length: 1.2, width: 1.1. Leg 1: femur 1.0, patella 0.3, tibia 1.0, metatarsus 0.8, tarsus 0.4. Morphology similar to the male except for the following. Prosoma and opisthosoma lighter in colour. Legs with lateral black blobs. Leg spination: metatarsus V 2-2-2; tibia P 1-0-0, V 2-4-4, R 1-0-0; patella P 1-0-0, R 1-0-0; femur D 0-2-1, P 0-0-1, R 0-0-1. Epigynum and vulva as in +Figure 21A–D +. + + +Distribution: +Endemic to the central highlands of +Sri Lanka +. Known from Agrapathana, Agrabopath forest and Horton Plains National Park. + + +Other material examined: +SRI LANKA +: +Central Province +, Nuwara Eliya District, Agrapathana, Agrabopath forest, +1100 m +, +07.iii.2000 +, +1♂ +2♀ +; +1–30.vi.2003 +, +7♂ +7♀ +(a single left palp on a sputter-coated SEM stub), all leg. Suresh P. Benjamin. Same locality, +08.iii.2000 +, +1♂ +leg. Sudath Nanayakkara. Same local- + +CO CD FD + + + +Figure 21. + +Onomastus pethiyagodai + +sp. nov. + +from Agrapathana, Sri Lanka. A, D, epigynum, ventral view. B, vulva, ventral view. C, ditto, dorsal view. Abbreviations: CD, copulatory duct; CO, copulatory opening; FD, fertilization duct. Scale bars = 0.2 mm. + + + +ity, +18–21.ii.2007 +, +3♂ +2♀ +, leg. Suresh P. Benjamin and Ziyard Jaleel. +Central Province +, Nuwara Eliya District, Horton Plains National Park, +c +. +2000 m +, +20–21.ii.2007 +, +15♂ +5♀ +, leg. Suresh P. Benjamin and Ziyard Jaleel. Deposited in MHNG. + + + + + +ONOMASTUS QUINQUENOTATUS +SIMON, 1900 + + + +( +FIGS 23A–D +, +24A–D +, +25A–H +) + + + + + +Onomastus quinquenotatus +Simon, 1900: 29 + + +. +2♀ +from +Sri Lanka +in MNHN 20771, examined. + + + + +O. quinquenotatus +Wanless, 1980: 183 + +, fig. 2a–e. Designation of +lectotype +and +paralectotype +. + + + + +Diagnosis: +Males are readily separated from + +O. patellari + +s and + +O. indra + +by the absence of TA2. Separated from + +O. complexipalpis + +, + +O. kanoi + +, + +O. kaharian + +, and + +O. nigrimaculatus + +by the filiform conductor. Separated from + +O. pethiyagodai + +and + +O. nigricauda + +by the shape of the MA ( +Fig. 23B +). + +Onomastus quinquenotatus + +is most closely related to + +O. pethiyagodai + +and they may be separated from each other by the shape of the conductor and MA ( +Fig. 23A–D +). Females are difficult to diagnose, but may be separated by details of the internal genitalia. + + +Male from Kandaela: +Total length: 3.1; prosoma length: 1.6, width: 1.3. Legs I: femur 1.6, patella 0.5, tibia 1.5, metatarsus 1.3, tarsus 0.6. Prosoma round to oval, longer than wide, pale amber to light yellow. Eyes with black surrounds except for AME. Opisthosoma oval, longer than wide, lighter in colour, no markings. Living specimens green in colour. Leg 1 posterior laterally black along its length, all other legs uniformly yellow. Chelicerae light yellow, with seven retromarginal and three promarginal teeth. Spider ventrally light yellow. Leg formula 4132. Leg spination: metatarsus V 4-2-2; tibia D 2-0-0, V 2-4-4; patella D 1-0-0; femur D 0-2-2. Palp as in +Figures 23A–D +, +25A–H +. + + +Female from Kandaela: +Total length: 2.2; prosoma length: 1.8, width: 1.3. Leg 1: femur 1.4, patella 0.5, + + + + +Figure 22. + +Onomastus pethiyagodai + +sp. nov. + +from Agrapathana, Sri Lanka (MHNG). A, left male palp, ventral view. B, ditto, retrolateral view. Scale bar = 0.2 mm. + + + + +Figure 23. + +Onomastus quinquenotatus + +, male from Hakgala, Sri Lanka (MHNG). A, left male palp, ventral view. B, profile of MA. C, profile of C. D, left male palp, retrolateral view. Abbreviations: C, conductor; E, embolus; MA, median apophysis; PA, patella apophysis; TA1, tegular apophysis 1; TA3, tegular apophysis 3. Scale bars = 0.1 mm (B, C), 0.2 mm (A, D). + + +CO +FD + + +Figure 24. + +Onomastus quinquenotatus + +. A, female lectotype (MNHN 20771), epigynum, ventral view. B, female from Kandaela, Sri Lanka (USNM), epigynum, ventral view. C, vulva, ventral view. D, ditto, ventral view. Abbreviations: CO, copulatory opening; FD, fertilization duct. Scale bars = 0.2 mm. + + + +tibia 1.6, metatarsus 1.3, tarsus 0.5. Morphology similar to the male except for the following: prosoma and opisthosoma lighter in colour; legs with lateral black blobs. Leg spination: metatarsus V 4-2-2; tibia V 2-2-2; femur D 0-1-2. Epigynum and vulva as in +Figure 24A–D +. + + +Distribution: +Known from two localities, Kandaela and Hakgala, in the central highlands of +Sri Lanka +. The type locality in the labels is given as +Sri Lanka +( +Simon, 1900 +). The exact locality of the +lectotypes +in +Sri Lanka +is unclear. + +Onomastus quinquenotatus + +is endemic to +Sri Lanka +. + + +Other material examined: +SRI LANKA +: +Central province +, north-east district, Kandaela reservoir, +5.6 miles +south-west of Nuwara Eliya, +2000 m +10–21.ii.1970 +, +1♂ +1♀ +, leg. Davis and Rowe, deposited in USNM; Hakgala, Hakgala forest, +27.vii.1996 +, +1600 m +, +♂ +, leg. Suresh P. Benjamin. Deposited in MHNG. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFCAFFDEFC0B51F4A0FDFB21.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFCAFFDEFC0B51F4A0FDFB21.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8ac3585ce21 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFCAFFDEFC0B51F4A0FDFB21.xml @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@ + + + +Revision and cladistic analysis of the jumping spider genus Onomastus (Araneae: Salticidae) + + + +Author + +Benjamin, Suresh P. + +text + + +Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society + + +2010 + +2010-06-30 + + +159 + + +3 + + +711 +745 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00580.x + +journal article +10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00580.x +0024-4082 +10114688 + + + + + +ONOMASTUS RATTOTENSIS + +SP. NOV. + + + + + + +( +FIGS 26A–D +, +27A–E +, +28A–G +) + + + + +Holotype +: + +♂ +from +Sri Lanka +. +Central Province +, +Knuckles +range, along +Rattota-Ilukkumbura Road +, + +900 m + +, + +03–04.ix.2003 + +, leg. +Suresh P. Benjamin. Deposited +in MHNG. + + + + + +Paratype +: + +♀ +from +Sri Lanka +. +Data +as above. +Deposited +in MHNG + +. + + +Etymology: +Adjective, ‘from Rattota’, after the +type +locality. + + +Diagnosis: +Males of + +O. rattotensis + +are readily separated from those of + +O. patellari + +s and + +O. indra + +by the absence of TA2. Separated from + +O. complexipalpis + +, + +O. kanoi + +, + +O. kaharian + +, and + +O. nigrimaculatus + +by the filiform conductor. Separated from + +O. pethiyagodai + +and + +O. quinquenotatus + +by the shape of the MA. Separated from + +O. nigricauda + +by the presence of a + + + +Figure 25. +Scanning electron micrographs of + +Onomastus quinquenotatus + +male from Hakgala, Sri Lanka (MHNG). A, D, G, prolateral view. B, E, H, ventral view. C, F, retrolateral view. Abbreviations: C, conductor; E, embolus; MA, median apophysis; PA, patella apophysis; TA1, tegular apophysis 1; TA3, tegular apophysis 3. Scale bars = 10 Mm (F, H), 30 Mm (B–E, G), 100 Mm (A). + + + + + +Figure 26. + +Onomastus rattotensis + +sp. nov. + +from Rattota, Sri Lanka (MHNG). A, left male palp, ventral view. B, ditto, retrolateral view. C, epigynum, ventral view. D, vulva, ventral view. E, ditto, dorsal view. Scale bars = 0.1 mm (D, E), 0.2 mm (A–C). + + + + +Figure 27. +Scanning electron micrographs of + + +Onomastus rattotensis + +sp. nov. + +from Rattota, Sri Lanka (MHNG). A, left male palp, retrolateral view. B, ditto, retrolateral view. C, ditto, prolateral view. D, female tracheal system, dorsal view. E, ditto, detail. Abbreviations: C, conductor; E, embolus; MA, median apophysis; MAP, mesal branch of MA; TA1, tegular apophysis 1; TA3, tegular apophysis 3. Scale bars = 100 Mm. The arrow points to the tracheae, which enter the prosoma. + + + +REVISION AND CLADISTICS OF + +ONOMASTUS + +743 + + + +Figure 28. +Scanning electron micrographs of + + +Onomastus rattotensis + +sp. nov. + +from Rattota, Sri Lanka (MHNG). A, left male palp, ventral view. B, MA and C, ventral view. C, F, MA tip, ventral view. D, profile of TA3, ventral view. E, profile of C tip, ventral view. G, serrated setae of the cymbium. Abbreviations: C, conductor; CY, cymbium; E, embolus; MA, median apophysis; MAP, mesal branch of MA; PA, patella apophysis; TA1, tegular apophysis 1; TA3, tegular apophysis 3. Scale bars = 10 Mm (B, E, F, G), 20 Mm (C, D), 100 Mm (A). + + +well-developed, pleated MA. Females are difficult to diagnose, but may be separated by details of the internal genitalia. + + +Male +holotype +: + +Total length: 2.8; prosoma length: 1.4, width: 1.1. Legs I: femur 1.1, patella 0.5, tibia 3.2, metatarsus 2.3, tarsus 1.3. The spiders are green in nature. They turn whitish to pale yellow in alcohol. Prosoma oval, longer than wide. Opisthosoma longer than wide, lighter in colour. Leg I yellowish brown, leg II–IV light yellow. Legs are laterally without dark markings. Eyes surrounded by dark rings. Chelicerae yellow, with seven retromarginal and three promarginal teeth. Leg formula 1432. Leg spination: metatarsus V 4-2-2; tibia D 1-0-0, V 4-2-4; patella D 1-0-0; femur D 0-2-2. Palp: cymbium oval. Retrolateral tibial apophysis stout, tapering blunt end ( +Figs 26A +, +27B +). + + + +Female +paratype +: + +Total length: 3.2; prosoma length: 1.4, width: 1.2. Legs 1: femur 1.3, patella 0.8, tibia 1.8, metatarsus 1.0, tarsus 0.4. Morphology similar to the male except for the following. Leg spination: metatarsus V 2-2-2; tibia V 2-2-2; femur D 0-1-0, P 2-3-1, R 2-3-1. Epigynum and vulva as in +Figure 26C–E +. + + +Distribution: +Sri Lanka +, central province, known only from the +type +locality. Probably endemic to +Sri Lanka +. + + +Other material examined: + +SRI LANKA +: +Central Province +, +Knuckles +range, along +Rattota-Ilukkumbura Road +, + +900 m + +, + +03–04.ix.2003 + +, +9♂ +, leg. +Suresh P. Benjamin. Deposited +in MHNG + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFD1FFF8FC575727A2D7FD6D.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFD1FFF8FC575727A2D7FD6D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d3ac4806ec7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFD1FFF8FC575727A2D7FD6D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ + + + +Revision and cladistic analysis of the jumping spider genus Onomastus (Araneae: Salticidae) + + + +Author + +Benjamin, Suresh P. + +text + + +Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society + + +2010 + +2010-06-30 + + +159 + + +3 + + +711 +745 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00580.x + +journal article +10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00580.x +0024-4082 + + + + + + +ONOMASTUS +SIMON, 1900 + + + + + + + +Type +species: +Onomastus nigricauda + +by original designation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFDBFFEDFC2353E3A35EF940.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFDBFFEDFC2353E3A35EF940.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7895a77069 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFDBFFEDFC2353E3A35EF940.xml @@ -0,0 +1,408 @@ + + + +Revision and cladistic analysis of the jumping spider genus Onomastus (Araneae: Salticidae) + + + +Author + +Benjamin, Suresh P. + +text + + +Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society + + +2010 + +2010-06-30 + + +159 + + +3 + + +711 +745 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00580.x + +journal article +10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00580.x +0024-4082 +10114688 + + + + + +ONOMASTUS KAHARIAN + +SP. NOV. + + + + + + +( +FIGS 5A–E +, +6A–F +) + + + + +Holotype +: + +♂ +from +Indonesia +, +Central Kalimantan +, +Kaharian +, +20°2′S +, +113°40′E +. +Swampy +primary forest, + + + + +Figure 9. + +Onomastus nigricauda + +from Bodinagala (MHNG). A, expanded left male palp, prolateral view. B, ditto, retrolateral view. Abbreviations: BH, basal haematodocha; C, conductor; E, embolus; EP, embolic base; MA, median apophysis; PA, patella apophysis; PT, patella; ST, subtegulum; T, tibia; TA1, tegular apophysis 1; TA3, tegular apophysis 3. Scale bar = 0.2 mm. + + + +D E + + + +Figure 10. + +Onomastus nigricauda + +. A, male lectotype (MNHN 20404/1-3), right palp, ventral view. B, female (found in the same vial as the lectotype). C, female from Bodinagala, epigynum, ventral view. D, ditto, vulva, ventral view. E, ditto, dorsal view. Abbreviations: C, conductor; CO, copulatory opening; CY, cymbium; FD, fertilization duct; MA, median apophysis; PA, patella apophysis; S, spermatheca; TA1, tegular apophysis 1; TA3, tegular apophysis 3. Scale bars = 0.1 mm (C), 0.2 mm (A, B, D, E). + + + + +Figure 11. +Scanning electron micrographs of + +Onomastus nigricauda + +from Bodinagala (MHNG). A, left male palp, prolateral view. B, D, ditto, ventral view. C, E, ditto, retrolateral view. F, G, epigynum, ventral view. Note the mating plug in F and G. Abbreviations: C, conductor; CO, copulatory opening; MA, median apophysis; MAP, mesal branch of MA; MP, mate plug. Scale bars = 10 Mm (G), 100 Mm (A–F). + + + +Diagnosis: +Males are readily separated from + +O. patellari + +s and + +O. indra + +by the absence of TA2. Separated from + +O. rattotensis + +, + +O. nigricauda + +, + +O. quinquenotatus + +, and + +O. pethiyagodai + +by the presences of a broad conductor ( +Fig. 6D +). Separated from + +O. complexipalpis + +, + +O. kanoi + +, and + +O. nigrimaculatus + +by the scoop-like MA and shape of C ( +Fig. 6D +). Females could be separated from all other + +Onomastus + +by the presence of semicircular epigynal fold and C-shaped CD ( +Fig. 5D, E +). + + + +Remarks: +Onomastus simoni + +appears to be closely related to + +O. kaharian + +. They may be separated from each other by the parallel course of CD in + +O. simoni + +. + + + +Male +holotype +: + +Total length: 3.4; prosoma length: 1.5, width: 1.0. Leg I: femur 1.6, patella 0.5, tibia 1.7, metatarsus 1.1, tarsus 0.5. All spiders are whitish to pale yellow in alcohol, no markings. Prosoma oval, almost as wide as long, laterals darker. Opisthosoma oval, longer than wide, lighter in colour. Legs pale yellow, laterally without dark markings; might be a result of preservation. All eyes except AME surrounded by dark rings. Chelicerae with pro- and retromarginal teeth, number not examined. Leg formula 4132. Leg spination: leg 1: metatarsus V 2-1-2; tibia V 2-2-3; femur D 0-0-1, P 0-1-2. Palp as in +Figures 5A, B +and +6A–F +. + + + +Female +paratype +: + +Total length: 3.5; prosoma length: 1.4, width: 1.0. Leg 1: femur 1.4, patella 0.4, tibia 1.5, metatarsus 1.1, tarsus 0.4. Morphology as above, except for the lighter coloured prosoma, opisthosoma and leg spination given below. Leg spination: leg 1: metatarsus V 2-1-2; tibia V 3-2-2; femur D 1-1-1. Epigynum and vulva as in +Figure 5C–E +. + + + +Figure 12. +Scanning electron micrographs of + +Onomastus nigricauda + +from Bodinagala (MHNG). A, profile of MA. B, ditto, detail. C, profile of TA1. Scale bars = 5 Mm (B), 10 Mm (A, C). + + + +in leaf litter, +2–16.ix.1985 +. Leg. Suharto Djojosudharmo. Deposited in RMNH. + + + + +Paratype +: + +♀ +from +Indonesia +, locality and label data as above. +Deposited +in RMNH + +. + + +Etymology: +The species name is a noun in apposition, taken from the +type +locality. + + +Distribution: +Thailand +and +Indonesia +. + + +Other material examined: + +Indonesia +: +Central Kalimantan +, +Kaharian +, +20°2′S +, +113°40′E +. Swampy primary forest, in leaf litter, 2–16.ix.85, +2♂ +(a single left palp on a sputter-coated SEM stub), +5♀ +, leg. +Suharto Djojosudharmo +, deposited in RMNH + +. + +Thailand +: +Nakhon Si Thammarat Prov. +Khao Luang NP +, +8°43′25.2″ N +, +99°40′7.7″E +, + +355 m + +, + +10–12.x.2003 + +(ATOL expedition 2003), +1♂ +1♀ +, deposited in USNM + +. + + + + + +ONOMASTUS KANOI +ONO, 1995 + + + +( +FIG. 7A–E +) + + + + + +Diagnosis: +Onomastus kanoi + +is readily distinguished from all known species of + +Onomastus + +except for + +O. complexipalpis + +by the large disk-shaped palpal conductor in the males ( +Fig. 7A–D +). The conductor of + +O. kanoi + +is relatively smaller than that of + +O. complexipalpis + +( +Fig. 7D +). The female of + +O. kanoi + +is unknown. However, I predict that the CD of + +O. kanoi + +females would be longer than that of all other + +Onomastus + +, but shorter than that of + +O. complexipalpis + +. + + + +Figure 13. + +Onomastus nigricauda + +from Morningside (MHNG). A, left male palp, ventral view. B, ditto, retrolateral view. Scale bars = 0.2 mm. + + + +Male: +Total length: 5.2; prosoma length: 2.0, width: 1.5. Leg I: femur 2.0, patella 0.6, tibia 2.0, metatarsus 2.0, tarsus 0.6. For a detailed description see +Ono (1995) +. + + +Female: +Unknown. + + +Distribution: +Endemic to +Okinawa +Island of +Japan +. + + +Material examined: + +Japan +, +Okinawa Prefecture +, +Okinawajima Island +, Kijoka. + +01.iv.1997 + +. +1♂ + +; + +Japan +, +Okinawa Prefecture +, +Okinawajima Island +, Zutsun. + +01.iv.2000 + +, 1¢. +All +leg. +Akio Tanikawa. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFDBFFF2FEA2518FA5A1F95A.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFDBFFF2FEA2518FA5A1F95A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8d8ee9657f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B878EFFDBFFF2FEA2518FA5A1F95A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ + + + +Revision and cladistic analysis of the jumping spider genus Onomastus (Araneae: Salticidae) + + + +Author + +Benjamin, Suresh P. + +text + + +Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society + + +2010 + +2010-06-30 + + +159 + + +3 + + +711 +745 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00580.x + +journal article +10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00580.x +0024-4082 +10114688 + + + + + +ONOMASTUS INDRA + +SP. NOV. + + + + + + +( +FIG. 4A–E +) + + + + +Holotype +: + +♂ +from +India +, +Kodaikanal +, +Grade +, + +1600 m + +, + +30.iii.1962 + +, leg. +E. S. Ross +and +D. Q. Cavagnaro. Deposited +in CAS. + + + + + +Paratypes +: + +2♀ +from the same locality as the holotype. Label data as above. Deposited in CAS + +. + + +Etymology: +Indra is the deity of war in the Hindu religion. I use the species epithet as a noun in apposition. + + +Diagnosis: +Separated from all other species except for + +O. patellaris + +by the occurrence of TA +2 in +males. Separated from + +O. patellaris + +by the shorter, stouter TA1 and TA2 ( +Fig. 4A, B +); further, the end of TA2 is in the shape of an upward hook in + +O. patellari + +s ( +Fig. 17A +). + + + +Male +holotype +: + +Total length: 3.8; prosoma length: 2.0, width: 1.3. Leg I: femur 1.6, patella 0.3, tibia 0.8, metatarsus 0.7, tarsus 0.3. All spiders are whitish to pale yellow in alcohol, no markings. Prosoma oval, almost as wide as long, laterals darker. Opisthosoma oval, longer than wide, lighter in colour. Legs pale yellow, laterally without dark markings; might be a result of preservation. All eyes except AME surrounded by dark rings. Chelicerae with pro- and retromarginal teeth, number not examined. Leg formula 4132. Leg spination: leg 1: metatarsus V 2-1-2; tibia V 2-2-3; femur D 0-0-1, P 0-1-2. Palps as in +Figure 4A and B +. + + + +Female +paratype +: + +Total length: 4.4; prosoma length: 2.0, width: 1.3. Leg 1: femur 1.6, patella 0.6, tibia 1.4, metatarsus 1.2, tarsus 0.6. Morphology as above, except for the lighter coloured prosoma and opisthosoma and leg spination given below. Leg spination: leg 1: metatarsus V 2-1-2; tibia V 3-2-2; femur D 1-1-1. Epigynum and vulva as in +Figure 4C–E +. + + +Other material examined: +None. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAA1B1CFE6DF63003304437.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAA1B1CFE6DF63003304437.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..79907732f0d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAA1B1CFE6DF63003304437.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + +6. +Prosoplus marianarum Aurivillius +, + + + + + + + + +Deutsche Ent. Zeitschr. +, +222 +, +1908 + +; + +Coleopt. Catalog +. ( +73 +): +263 +, +1922 + + +. + + + + + + +Machanao, June 5; beach near Atao, June 25 +; +Ritidian Pt., June 30, + +Usinger,threespecimens. Nodataastohabits. + + + + +This species was described from the +Marianas Islands +and has not been recorded elsewhere. \Ve found it only rarely. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAA1B1DFE62FD2704C44261.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAA1B1DFE62FD2704C44261.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bcfbc5a545a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAA1B1DFE62FD2704C44261.xml @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +3. + +Gelonaetha hirta +(Fairmaire) + +. + + + + + + + + +Stromatium hirtum +Fairmaire +, +Rev. Mag. Zool. +II, + +2 +: + +60 +, +1850 + +. + + + + + + + +Astrimus hirtus +(Fairmaire) +Sharp +, + +Fauna +Hawaii +. + +2 +( +3 +): +96 +, +1900 + +. + + + + + + + +Gelonaetha hirta +(Fairmaire) +Gahan +, + +Fauna Brit. +India + +, Coleopt. + +1 +: + +155 +, fig. 62, +1906 + +. + +Aurivillius +, +Coleopt. Catalog +. ( +39 +): +126 +, +1912 + + +. + + + + + + +Machanao, June 4, Swezey; Piti, June 8, Swezey; Piti, Sept. +7, +at light, Swezey. Threespecimens. + + + + + +This beetle is known in +India +, +Philippines +and Tahiti. It is now recorded from +Guam +for the first time. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAA1B1DFE6CF92C02D54F56.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAA1B1DFE6CF92C02D54F56.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..95a9efd5a0c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAA1B1DFE6CF92C02D54F56.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +5. + +Prosoplus bankii +(Fabricius) + +. + + + + + + + + +Lamia bankii +Fabricius +, +Syst. Ent. +, +176 +, +1775 + +. + + + + + + + +Prosoplus ban!?ii +(Fabricius) +Sharp +, + +Fauna +Hawaii + +. +2 +( +3 +): +114 +, +1900 + +. + +Schultze +, +Philip. Jour. Sci. +11, +D: +115 +, +1916 + + +. + + + + + + +Piti, April 28, Bryan; Piti, April 30, from + +Hibiscus tiliaceus, + +Usinger; Piti, May 15, Usinger; Merizo, June 11, on corn, Swezey; Piti, June 15, Swezey; Fonte Valley, Aug. +7, +on weeds, Swezey; Dededo, Aug. 11, on corn, Swezey; Piti, Aug. 13, 19, at light, Oct. +27, +Swezey; Yigo, Nov. 8, attracted to corn tassels, Nov. 13, on seed cluster of palm, + +Coccothrinax +species + +, Swezey. Fullaway, 1911. + + + + + +This species has a wide distribution from Java, Borneo, and +Philippines +through the Malay Archipelago to Northern +Australia +, also Hawaii. Although we did not rear this common longicorn, it doubtless breeds in dead stems of many kinds of plants in +Guam +as it does in Hawaii. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAA1B1DFE6CFBCA01504041.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAA1B1DFE6CFBCA01504041.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d3dcbb6fd95 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAA1B1DFE6CFBCA01504041.xml @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +41. + +Chlorophorus annularis +(Fabricius) + +. + + + + + + + + +Callidium annularis +Fabricius +, +Mant. Ins. + +1 +: + +156 +, +1787 + +. + + + + + + + +Chlorophorus annularis +(Fabricius) +Chevrolat +, +Soc. Roy. Sci. Liege, Mem. + +18 +: + +290 +, +1863 + +. + +Aurivillius +, +Coleopt. Catalog +. ( +39 +): +402 +, +1912 + +. + +Schultze +, +Philip. Jour. Sci. +11, +D: +107 +, +1916 + + +. + + + + + +Merizo, April 24, Bryan; Barriga<la, Aug. 28, attracted to corn tassels, Swezey. Fullaway, 1911. + + + + +The bamboo borer occurs in +India +, +Burma +, +Siam +, +China +, +Japan +, through the Malay Archipelago to New +Guinea +. It has been known in Hawaii since 1905, doubtless introduced in bamboo furniture or other articles. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAB1B1CFED3F83A04364EB3.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAB1B1CFED3F83A04364EB3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4bb8c8bad60 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAB1B1CFED3F83A04364EB3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. + +Aphthona + +species near +bicolorata +Jacoby. + + + + + + +Piti, May 26, June 2, on + +Euphorbia hirta, + +Usinger; Umatac, May 28, Usinger; Sumay, Aug. 17, on + +Euphorbia atoto, + +Swezey. + + + + + +A small species collected only a few times on + +Euphorbia +. + +Determined by G. E. Bryant, British Museum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAB1B1CFED6FD28013A415A.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAB1B1CFED6FD28013A415A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..38cb3447dc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAB1B1CFED6FD28013A415A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + +1. + +Phytorus lineolatus +Weise + +(?), + + + + + + + + + + +Philip +. +Jour. Sci. 8 + +, + +D: +220 + +, +1913 + + +. + + + + + + + +Talofofo, March 28, April 1, on mango, Bryan; Tumon, April 2, Bryan; Tiyan, April 2, on mango, Bryan; Ritidian Pt., April 15, on ferns, Bryan; Yona, April 29, Bryan; Piti, April 30, on + +Hibiscus tiliaceus, +Swezey, + +Usinger + +, + +July 26, at light, Swezey, Sept. 26, on mango, Swezey, Oct. 6, at light, Swezey, Nov. 29, on ban1boo, Swezey; Agana, May 4, on mango, May 25, on + +Pithecolobium +dulce, + +Swezey; Upi Trail, May 5, Bryan; Dededo, May 11, on + +Cycas, + +Usinger, on + +Ochrosia, + +Swezey; Inarajan, May +7, +on coconut, June 8, on mango, July 25, on +Ba.rringtonia racemosa, +Swezey; Umatac, May 28, on mango and + +Thespesia populnea, + +Swezey; Agat, May 31, on + +Hernandia peltata, + +Swezey; Merizo, June 11, on grape and mango, Swezey, Usinger; Sinajana, June 15, Swezey; Mt. Alifan, June 17, on + +Macaranga, +Swezey + +; Dandan, July 17, on + +Glochidion + +and + +Citrus, +Swezey + +; Orote Pen. + +, + +on mango and + +Mallotus, +Swezey + +; Yigo, Oct. 21, on small-leaved + +Ficus +, + +Nov. 13, on +Terniinalia catappa, +Swezey; Tumon, Nov. 13, on mango, Swezey; Yona, Nov. 18, on corn, Swezey. + + + + + +Determined by H. S. Barber by comparison with specimens in the Baker Philippine collection determined by Weise and marked with a (?). +Guam +specimens have previously been determined as +P. ping11is +and + +P. puncticollis +, + +but do not have the strong spine of front femora as in +pinguis, +nor the distinct puncturation of thorax as in +puncticolris. +An abundant chrysomelid, which sometimes defoliates mango trees. Many other kinds of trees are also fed on by this beetle. The larvae are unknown and nothing has been learned of the life history of the species. The species was described from the +Philippines +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAC1B1AFE70F75E0546449F.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAC1B1AFE70F75E0546449F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1a2cd2267ff --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAC1B1AFE70F75E0546449F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +5. + +Holotrichia mindanaoana +Brenske + +, + + + + + + + +Berlin Ent. Zeitschr +. + +38 +: + +358 +, +1893 + +. + +Schultze +, +Philip. Jour. Sci. +11, +D: +179 +, +1916 + + +. + + + + + +Agana, April 16, 19, May 4, at light, Bryan; Piti, May 30, June 8, 12, July 12, at light, Swezey; Piti, May 9, at light, Usinger. Grubs were found at corn roots at Dededo, Nov. 25, Swezey. + + + + +Another Philippine species considerably larger than + +Anomala +sulcatitla + +Burmeister. It is probably the species whose grubs were found at pineapple roots by Fullaway in 1911, and mentioned as + +Lachnosterna +species + +by Vandenberg in the 1930 report of the +Guam +Agricultural Experiment Station. At present they are injurious to corn roots in some places. The beetles are nocturnal, and feed sometimes destructively on banana leaves. Determined by F. X. Williams. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAC1B1BFE69FD1F05524209.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAC1B1BFE69FD1F05524209.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c7f76d9df88 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAC1B1BFE69FD1F05524209.xml @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. + +Ataenius cognatus +(Le Conte) + +. + + + + + + + + +Euparia cognata +Le Conte +, +Phila. Nat. Sci. Acad., Proc. +, +65 +, +1858 + +. + + + + + + + +Ata.enius cognatus +(Le Conte) +Gemminger +and +Harold +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +4 +): +1066 +, +1869 + + +. + + + + + + +Piti, July +27, +Sept. 14, in corn field + +, +Sept. 21, in cow clung, Swezey +. + + + + +Dr. Chapin says that it may not be this species, as several species are involved in what has been called + +cognatus +. + +Only a few specimens were collected in +Guam +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAC1B1BFE75FBD8014343E6.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAC1B1BFE75FBD8014343E6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..35f1852b6a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAC1B1BFE75FBD8014343E6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +3. + +Aphodius lividus +(Olivier) + +. + + + + + + + + +Scarabaeus lividus +Olivier +, +Ent. + +1 +: + +86 +, pl. 26, fig. 222, +1789 + +. + + + + + + + +Aphodius lividus +(Olivier) +Gemminger +and +Harold +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +4 +): +1051 +, +1869 + +. + + + + + +Piti, May 30, in cow dung, June 24, in rotten breadfruit, July 27, Sept. 21, in cow dung, Swezey. Fullaway, 1911. + + + +This cosmopolitan species was collected a few times in +Guam +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAC1B1BFE77FA4F02C34EF5.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAC1B1BFE77FA4F02C34EF5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..31cab655fdb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAC1B1BFE77FA4F02C34EF5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +4. + +Anomala sulcatula +Burmeister + +, + + + + + + + + + +Hanclb. Ent. +, +4 +( +1 +): +261 +, +1844 +. +Schultze +, + +Philip. Jour. Sci. +11, +D: +172 +, +1916 + + +. + + + + + +Agana, April 19, 23, Bryan; Tarague, May 17, Swezey; Agat, May 21, on corn leaf, Swezey; Machanao, June 30, ex rotten breadfruit trunk, Swezey, Usinger; Piti, June 15, Usinger; Piti, June 12, 15, July 9, 12, 13, 19, Aug. 10, +27, +Oct. 5, 6, Nov. 25, all at light, Swezey; Piti, Oct. 31, on bamboo, Swezey; Sumay, Nov. 28, about a dozen on screen door at Pan-American Airways mess hall, Swezey; grubs found at corn roots, a little north of Decledo, Nov. 25, Swezey. + + + + +A Philippine species which is now quite common in +Guam +. It is nocturnal, yet may be found on its food plants in the daytime. The grubs do some damage to corn roots, and are also found in other situations. Most of our adults were collected as they came to light. Determined by F. X. Williams, Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAD1B1AFEF1FC86029F4E57.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAD1B1AFEF1FC86029F4E57.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..af381116a0b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAD1B1AFEF1FC86029F4E57.xml @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. + +Dihammus marianarum +(Aurivillius) + +. + + + + + + + + +Monochamus (Haplohammus) Marianarum +Aurivillius +, +Deutsche Ent. Zeitschrift +, +216 +, +1908 + +. + + + + + + + +Dihammus Marianarwm +( +Aurivillius +) +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +73 +): +98 +, +1922 + + +. + + + + + + +Agfayan, March 28, Bryan; Orote Pen., April 9, Bryan; Merizo, April 24, Bryan; Upi Trail, May 5, Usinger; Machanao, June 2, Swezey; Piti, May 2, on + +Pithecolobium, +Usinger + +; Dededo, May 11, Usinger; Talofofo, June 11, Usinger; Barrigada, June 12, on + +Citrus +, + +June 14, on + +Ficus +, + +June 24, Usinger; Dededo, Sept. +7, +reared from + +Hibiscus +tiliaceits, + +Swezey; Piti, Sept. 22, Oct. 3, Swezey; Yigo, Oct. 18, reared from dead +Firns, +Swezey; Piti, Nov. 16, at light, Swezey. + + + + + +This is the largest cerambycid in +Guam +. It was previously collected by Fullaway in 1911, and determined by Schultze as + +Dihammus fistulator +Germar + +, a species having a wide range from Malay Peninsula and the +Philippines +to +Australia +and +Samoa +. The specimens identified by Schultze, however, have the lateral shining bare spots of the abdomen, the same as our 1936 specimens, which is a character by which Aurivillius distinguishes + +marianarum + +from other closely related species. + + +The work of the larvae of this beetle is very conspicuous in dead bran(;hes of the breadfruit tree. It also works similarly in + +Pithecolobium +, +Ficus +, + +and + +Hibisrns tiliaceus +, + +and any felled tree. Before getting too old and dried up, the leftover tree tops where logs had been cut were especially likely to have larvae working in them. At Yigo, November 13, larvae were found in living cacao trees. When working in or beneath the inner bark, they had a tendency to go spirally around a branch, which either crippled or killed it. One larva retained for rearing by A. I. Cruz matured + +February 19, +1937 + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAD1B1DFEF3F731002A4447.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAD1B1DFEF3F731002A4447.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..63916742bef --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAD1B1DFEF3F731002A4447.xml @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. + +Ceresium unicolor +(Fabricius) + +. + + + + + + + + +Sa.perda unicolor +Fabricius +, +Mant. Ins. + +1 +: + + +147 +, +1787 +. + + + + + + + + + +Ceresium imicolor +(Fabricius) +Aurivillius +, + +Insects of +Samoa + +4 +( +2 +): +138 +, +1928 + +. + + + + + +Blair +, +B. P. Bishop Mus., Bull + +114 +: + + +274 +, + +1935 +. + + + + + + + + +Piti, June 10, 15, July 9, 12, 19, 22, 23, 24, Sept. 14, 22, Oct. 12, 19, Nov. 25, Swezey; Mt. Alifan, June 27, Usinger; Barrigada, July 22, reared from + +Intsia bijuga, +Swezey + +; Fadian, Sept. 18, Swezey; Sumay, Sept. 28, Swezey; Merizo, Oct. 2, Swezey. Fullaway, 1911. + + + + + +This species is widely distributed in the Pacific. In Hawaii it has been known as + +Ceresium simplex +. + +We found it very abundant in 1936, breeding in dead branches or fallen trees of several kinds. The beetles often came to light. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B18FE60F7F5055C4790.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B18FE60F7F5055C4790.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1044a3dc755 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B18FE60F7F5055C4790.xml @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +10. + +Derosphaerus rotundicollis +(Castelnau) + +. + + + + + + + + +Upis rotundicollis +Castelnau +, +Hist. Nat. +2 +: +213 +, +1840 + + +. + + + + + + +Derosphaerus rotundicollis +(Castelnau) +Gebien +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +28 +): +449 +, +1911 + +; + + +Nova +Guinea + +13 +( +3 +): +305 +, +1920 + + +. + + + + + + +Ritidian Pt., April 15, on + +Hernandia + +blossoms, Bryan; Mt. Alifan, May 26, in rotten log, Swezey; Piti, June 12, at light, Swezey; Machanao, June 30, under bark of + +Elaeocarpus joga + +log, Swezey; Libugon Farm, Nov. 10, under bark of dead orange tree, Swezey. Seven specimens, found at widely distributed places. + + + + + +Described from the +Philippines +, also recorded from +Formosa +and Saipan, +Marianas Islands +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6CFA16039C40F9.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6CFA16039C40F9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2e375b66ff1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6CFA16039C40F9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +8. + +Tribolium ferrugineum +(Fabricius) + +. + + + + + + + + +Trogosita ferruginea +Fabricius +, +Mant. Ins. + +1 + +: +212 +, +1787 + +. + + + + + + + +Triboliuin ferrugineuin +(Fabricius) +Gebien +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +28 +): +394 +, +1911 + + +. + + + + + +Piti, July 30, Aug. 9, Nov. 9, in house, Swezey; Piti, Oct. 29, in package of food, Swezey. A cosmopolitan species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6CFB0D04884342.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6CFB0D04884342.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..34e29ab7c5b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6CFB0D04884342.xml @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +7. +Scotochares insularis Boheman +, + + + + + + + +Eugenîes Resa, Ins +. C01., +95 +, pl. 1, fig. 6, +1358 + + + + + + + +Inarajan, June 25, in old cotton boll, Swezey, one specimen. +Described from Guam. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6CFC7E002E42BA.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6CFC7E002E42BA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cbb22f25940 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6CFC7E002E42BA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +*6. +Üloma picicornis Fairmaire +, + + + + + + + +Notes Leyden Mus +. +4 +: +224 +, +1882 +. + + +Gebien +, +nrflnnnf' Önfffıno +* +Í 7Q +\ 4H2 +1911 +WWW .. Vmmub. VN, W, + + + + + + + +Piti, Oct. 27, ten specimens in rotten bamboo stubs, Swezey +. + + + +This species and Uíoma rufilabris Fairmaire Were described from Sumatra. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6CFD060257459B.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6CFD060257459B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8032dc471e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6CFD060257459B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +*5. + +Uloma rufilabris +Fairmaire + +, + + + + + + + +Notes Leyden Mus. + +4 +: + +226 +, +1882 + +. + +Gebien +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +28 +): +404 +, +1911 + +. + +Schultze +, +Philip. Jour. Sci +. + +11 +, + +D: +69 +, +1916 + + +. + + + + + + +Sinajana, June 15, Swezey; Piti, June 10, Sept. 21, under cow dung, Swezey; Piti, Oct. 19, at light, Swezey; +four specimens + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6DF94704054E2C.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6DF94704054E2C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7ed648fd016 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAE1B19FE6DF94704054E2C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +9. + +Palorus ratzeburgi +(Wissmann) + +. + + + + + + + + +Hypophloeus Ratzeburgii +Wissmann +, +Stett. Ent. Zeitung + +9 + +: + +77 +, + +1848 + +. + + + + + + + +Palorus Ratzeburgi +(Wissmann) +Gebien +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +28 +): ~ +97 +, +1911 + + +. + + + + + + +Barrigada, July 22, under bark of + +lntsia bijuga + +log, Swezey. A widely distributed species. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B18FEF8FCDC06A242F0.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B18FEF8FCDC06A242F0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0ba29c8dfcf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B18FEF8FCDC06A242F0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +Sessinia livida +(Fabricius) + +. + + + + + + + +Lagria livida +Fabricius +, +Syst. Ent. +, +14 +, +1775 + +. + + + + + + + +Sessinia livida +(Fabricius) +Blair +, + +Insects of +Samoa + +, + +4 +( +2 +): + +93 +, +1928 + + +. + + + + + + +Piti, June 8, 13, at light, Swezey, +two specimens +. FuUaway, 1911. + + + + + +This light brown species was described from Tahiti. It occurs also in +Samoa +, +Tonga +, +Fiji +and +Ellice Islands +. Determination was verified by H. S. Barber. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B18FEF8FE7D06C444C6.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B18FEF8FE7D06C444C6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8a61892f3f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B18FEF8FE7D06C444C6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +11. + +Xyloborus nudus +(Gebien) + +? + + + + + + + + +Cherostus nitdus +Gebien +, + +Sarawak +Mus. Jour. + + +2 +: + +14 +, +1914 +. + + + + + + + + +Xyloborus nudus + +(teste Barber). + + + + + + + +Talofofo plateau, June 17, in rotten + +Areca + +palm trunk, Usinger, +one specimen +. Described from Borneo. Determined by +H. S. Barber +, +U. S. +National Museum + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B18FEFDF8DD04614EFF.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B18FEFDF8DD04614EFF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9e77cbb77c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B18FEFDF8DD04614EFF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. +Figulus lilliputanus Westwood +, + + + + + + + + + +Ent. Soc. London, Trans. +, +219 +, pl. 12, + +fig. 5, +1855 + +. + +Van Roon +, +Coleopt. Catalog +. ( +8 +): +52 +, +1910 + + +. + + + + + +Agana Swamp, May 4, in rotten + +Pandanus + +trunk, Swezey; Yigo, Oct. 18, in rotten breadfruit trunk, Swezey. Three specimens. + + + + +This very small species was described from +Australia +. Our +Guam +specimens were taken in similar locations to +F. integricoll-is +Thomson. Determined by E. C. Zimmerman, Honolulu. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B18FEFDFAFB02184170.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B18FEFDFAFB02184170.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d771bda60c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B18FEFDFAFB02184170.xml @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. + +Figulus integricollis +Thomson + +, + + + + + + + + + + +Ent +. +Soc. + +France +, Ann + +. + +IV, + +2 +: + +431 +, +1862 + + +. + + + + + + + +Mt. Tenjo, May 3, in + +Areca + +palm, Swezey; Agana, May 4, in + +Pandanus, +Swezey + +; Dededo, May 11, in + +Pandanus, + +Usinger; Yona, May 12, in sugar cane, Swezey; Mt. Alifan, May 26, Usinger; Machanao, June 2, miscellaneous sweeping, June 30, under bark, Swezey + +; I +3arrigada, June 12, rotten log +, + +July 6, in + +lntsia +bijuga + + +, +July 22, in breadfruit, Swezey; Piti, June 18, in breadfruit, Oct. 27, in bamboo stubs, Swezey; Fadian, Sept. 18, in rotten log, Swezey; Yigo, Oct. 21, in petiole of dead coconut leaf, Swezey. Fu11away, 1911. + + + + +Described from the +Marianas Islands +and not recorded elsewhere. 1We found it quite common, the larvae feeding in rotten logs. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B1BFEF3F6F903A14449.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B1BFEF3F6F903A14449.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e1d13f815a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFAF1B1BFEF3F6F903A14449.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + +1. + + +Ataenius gracilis +(Melsheimer) + +. + + + + + + + + +Oxymnus gracilt"s +Melsheimer +, +Phila. Nat. Sci. Acad., Proc. +2 +: +137 +, +1844 + + +Ataenius gracilis +(Melsheimer) +Horn +, +Am. Ent. Soc., Trans +. +3 +: +286 +, +1871 + + +. + + + +. + + +Yona, April 29, among dead leaves, Bryan; Inarajan, June 8, in rice field, Usinger; Piti, Sept. 21, in cow dung, Swezey. + + + + +This species is widely distributed in North and South +America +. Determined by E. A. Chapin, +U. S. +National Museum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B06FE74F6BF05C74412.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B06FE74F6BF05C74412.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b8809feeb0f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B06FE74F6BF05C74412.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +5. + +Buprestis aurulenta +Linnaeus + +, + + + + + + + +Syst. Nat., 12th eel., +661 +, +1767 + +. + +Obenberger +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +111 +): +407 +, +1930 + + +. + + + + +One specimen of this American species was obtained in our residence at Piti, July 9. It had apparently issued from a porch floor board as there was an exit hole which appeared fairly fresh. Two other similar holes had an older appearance. The boards were of Douglas fir which had been shipped from the Puget Sound region. The house was constructed prior to 1915. It does not seem probable that the larva of this beetle could have existed for that length of time before maturing. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FC54FE2C02BD443C.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FC54FE2C02BD443C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..45b22857393 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FC54FE2C02BD443C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +FAMILY +BUPRESTIDAE + + + + + +Determined by W. S. Fisher, +U. S. +National Museum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FE68FDA1031A4546.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FE68FDA1031A4546.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..37220698800 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FE68FDA1031A4546.xml @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +1. +Cyphogastra auripennis Saunders +, + + + + + + + +Ent. Soc. London, Trans. +, +432 +, pl. 22, fig. 2, +1867 + +. + +Obenberger +, +Coleopt. Catalog +. ( +84 +): +116 +, +1926 + + +. + + + + + + +Mt. Lamlam, altitude +1,334 ft. +, April 21, dead on summit, Bryan; Sumay, May 9, Bryan; Piti, June 23, on + +Antigonon leptopus + +vine on trellis, Swezey. Three specimens. + + + + + +This large green species was described from +Guam +. In the Junk Catalogue it is ascribed only to the Carolines. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FE74FC23001842C5.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FE74FC23001842C5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2e62cd8d62f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FE74FC23001842C5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. + +Chrysodema ventralis +Waterhouse + +, + + + + + + + + + +Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. +, V, + +15 +: + +381 +, + +1885 + +. + +Obenberger +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +84 +): +135 +, +1926 + + +. + + + + + + +Dededo, Aug. 11, on corn leaf, Swezey; Piti, Aug. 13, 24, Sept. 21, Oct. 12, 25, +27, +Nov. 6, Swezey. + + + + + +Described +from +Guam +, +Ladrone Islands +and not recorded elsewhere. +This +sdinewhat smaller bright green species was more abundant. +One +or +two specimens +were + +swept from + +Glochidion + + +111,arianum trees on several occasions at Piti. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FE77F94C01334EC7.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FE77F94C01334EC7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6c0ea783ac7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FE77F94C01334EC7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +4. + +Agrilus occipitalis +(Eschscholtz) + +. + + + + + + + +Buprestis occipitalis +Eschscholtz +, +Entomogr. +, +79 +, +1822 + +. + + + + + + + +Agrilus occipitalis +(Eschscholtz) +Obenberger +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +152 +): +1094 +, +1936 +. + + + + + + + + +Yona, March 28, on tangerine trunk, Bryan; Inarajan, May +7, +on lime tree, Bryan; Barrigacla, June 14, on + +Citrus +, + +Usinger; Machanao, Aug. 6, Swezey; Agana, Aug. +7, +on + +Citrus +, + +Swezey; Piti, Oct. 2, Nov. 6, beaten from + +Citrus +, + +Swezey. Fullaway, 1911. + + + + + +Described from the +Philippines +, also recorded from +China +and Turkestan. This small black species was common on dead branches of + +Citrus +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FE77FAA2040A40EA.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FE77FAA2040A40EA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..78f88a87525 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB01B07FE77FAA2040A40EA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +3. + +Chrysobothris costata +Kerremans + +, + + + + + + + + + + +Soc. Ent. +Belgique +, Ann. + + +39 +: + +213 +, +1895 + +. + + +Obenberger +, +Coleopt. Catalog +. ( +132 +): +600 +, +1934 + +. + + + + + + + +Dandan, July 17, on + +Citrus, +Swezey + +; Barrigada, July 6, 22, on + +Intsia bijuga, + +Swezey + +; +Machanao, Aug. 6, Swezey. + + + + +Described +from +Marianas Islands +, and not recorded elsewhere. +This +abundant green species is smaller and duller. +The +larvae were found very abundant under bark of remaining top of an + +Intsia bijuga + +tree which had been cut off at +Barrigacla +for timber. +From +portion of branch, taken home +July +22, +10 adults +issued between August 3 and October 1. + +TODO + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B06FCDFFDDF02AD4524.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B06FCDFFDDF02AD4524.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e67efd0756f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B06FCDFFDDF02AD4524.xml @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +FAMILY +TENEBRIONIDAE + + + + + +Those species marked with an asterisk were identified by comparison with specimens from the +Philippines +in the +U. S. +National Museum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B06FEE4FC8302A54339.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B06FEE4FC8302A54339.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dbb0d955e39 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B06FEE4FC8302A54339.xml @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. + +Gonocephalum seriatum +(Boisduval). + + + + + + + + + +Opatruin seriatuin +Boisduval +, +Voy. Astrolabe + +2 +: + +252 +, +1835 + +. + + + + + + + +Gonocephalum seriatu11i +(Boisduval) +Gebien +, + +Nov. +Guinea + +13 +( +3 +): +234 +, +1920 + +. + +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +22 +): +326 +, +1910 + + +. + + + + + +Umatac, May 14, Usinger; Piti, May 30, under cow dung, Swezey; Piti, Aug. 3, under stones, Swezey; Piti, Sept. 17, under stone, Swezey; Orote, July 19, Swezey. Fullaway, 1911. + + + + +This widely distributed species, common in Hawaii and +Guam +, was described from +Marshall Islands +and occurs also in New +Guinea +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B06FEE8F89803EE4F27.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B06FEE8F89803EE4F27.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..46c6e801c01 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B06FEE8F89803EE4F27.xml @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +*3. + +Alphitobius laevigatus +(Fabricius) + +. + + + + + + + +Opatruin laevigatum +Fabricius +, +Spec. Ins. +1 +: +90 +, +1781 +. + + + + + + + + +Alphitobius laevigatus +(Fabricius) +Gebien +, + +Nov. +Guinea + + +13 +( +3 +): + +277 +, +1920 + +. + + + + + + + +Alphitobius laevigatus +(Fabricius) +Blair +, + +Ins. +Samoa + +4 +( +2 +): + +77 +, + +1928 + +. + + + + + + + +Helops piceus +Olivier +, +Encycl. Meth. +7: SO, +1792 + + +. + + + + + + +Piti, June 3, 12, July 5, Sept. 1, 18, 30, Oct. 19, at light, Swezey; Aug. 27, in oat bin, Swezey; Aug. 31, Sept. +27, +Nov. 22, in house, Swezey; June 8, 15, July +27, +30, Aug. 1, without data, Swezey. + + + + + +A widely distributed species, occurring in +Hawaii +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B06FEEDFA8205E5413B.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B06FEEDFA8205E5413B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4f2c1e86af4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B06FEEDFA8205E5413B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + +2. + +Bradymerus acuticostis +Gebien + +(?), + + + + + + + + + + + +Philip +. +Jour. Sci +. + + +26 +: + +563 +, +1925 + + +. + + + + + + + +Yona, April +27, +among dead leaves, Bryan; Agana, May 4, in rotten + +Pandanus + +log, Swezey; Piti, May 30, under cow clung, Swezey; Piti, Aug. 4, Sept. 16, under rotten board, Swezey; Piti, Sept. 15, in dead stem of + +Barleria cristata, + +Swezey; Piti, Oct. 27, in rotten bamboo stumps, Swezey. + + + + + +Described from the +Philippines +. I have found no other record. Very abundant in +Guam +under rotten boards, etc. The +Guam +material appears to agree more nearly with this species than with the more abundant Philippine species, +B. clathratus +Schaufuss. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B19FEF7F68D04D344A6.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B19FEF7F68D04D344A6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a3857e7ecc1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB11B19FEF7F68D04D344A6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +*4. + +Eutochia +lateralis (Boheman) + +. + + + + + + + +Heterophaga lateralis +Boheman +, +Eugenies Resa +, +94 +, +1858 + +. + + + + + + + + + +Eutochia lateralis +(Boheman) +Gebien +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +28 +): +408 +, +1911 + + + +Piti, July +27, +Oct. 23, in rotten sugar cane, Swezey; Piti, Sept. 28, Oct. 6, under coconut husk and stones in pasture, Swezey; Talofofo, Nov. 18, in dead corn stalk, Swezey. + + + + +. + + +A common widely distributed species, described from +Hongkong +. Occurs in Hawaii and the +Philippines +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B04FE7CF61902BA44BE.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B04FE7CF61902BA44BE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..97f32359d15 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B04FE7CF61902BA44BE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + +2. + +Xylopsocus capucinus +(Fabricius) + +. + + + + + + + + + +Bostrichus capuc-inus +Fabricius +, +Spec. Ins +. + +1 +: + + + +62 +, +1781 + + + + +. + + + + + + +Xylopsocus capucinus +(Fabricius) +Lesne, Soc +. + +Ent. +<collectingCountry box="[1294,1418,349,391]" name="France" pageId="13" pageNumber="163">France</collectingCountry> + +, +Ann. + +69 +: + +631 +, figs. 478,481,482, +1900 + + +. + + + + + + +Ritidian Pt., April 15, swept from ferns, Bryan, +one specimen +. Fullaway, 1911. + + + + + +Distributed in Indo-Malaya, +Philippines +, +Madagascar +, Africa, tropical +America +. Determined by W. S. Fisher, +U. S. +National Museum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B05FE70F7ED03ED4F48.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B05FE70F7ED03ED4F48.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ab5dec7af10 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B05FE70F7ED03ED4F48.xml @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. + +Xylothrips religiosus +(Boisduval) + + +. + + + + + + + +Xylopertha religiosa +Boisduval +, +Voy. Astrolabe +, +460 +, +1835 + +. + + + + + + +Xylothrips religiosus +(Boisduval) +Lesne +, + +Soc. Ent. +France + +, Ann. + +69 +: + +624 +, figs. 473, 475-477, +1900 + +. + + + + + + +Machanao, June 4, under bark, Swezey, +one specimen + +. + + + +Generally distributed in the Pacific islands. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B05FE72F981028A41FE.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B05FE72F981028A41FE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cacee2bffee --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B05FE72F981028A41FE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +3. + +Noteropagus obscurus +d'Orchymont + +, + + + + + + + + + + +Soc. Ent. +France +, Ann. + +88 +: +135 +, + +1919 + +. + +Knisch +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +79 +): +155 +, +1924 + + +. + + + + + + +Ritidian Pt., April 16, Bryan, +one specimen +; + + +Mt. Alifan +, May 26, in papaya log, Usinger, +one specimen + +; + +Yigo, Nov. 13, in rotten banana stem, Swezey, +three specimens +. + + + + + +A tiny black species, described from +Borneo +and Timor. One specimen retained by +Buchanan +, +U. S. +National Museum +, and +one specimen +from +Yigo +at +British Museum. Determined +by +J. Balfour-Browne +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B05FE72FE5B0188422A.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B05FE72FE5B0188422A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..01d52644709 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B05FE72FE5B0188422A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. +Dactylosternum abdominale (Fabricius) +. + + + + + + + + +Sphaeridium abdominale +Fabricius +, +Ent. Syst. +, +1 +, + +79 +, + +1792 + +. + + + + + + + +Dactylosternum abdontinale +(Fabricius) +Sharp +, +Fauna Haw. +3 +( +5 +): + +579 +, + +1908 + +. + +d'Orchymont +, + +Ins. +Samoa + +4 +( +1 +): +30 +, +1927 + + +. + + + + + + +Dededo, May 19, in rotten banana stem, Usinger, Sept. +7, +in rotten banana stem, Swezey; Asan, Aug. 22, in rotten breadfruit on ground, Swezey; Piti, Sept. 20, in rotten breadfruit, Swezey; Agana, Oct. 3, in royal palm top where infested by + +Rhabdocnemis +obsrnra, + +Swezey; Yigo, Nov. 13, in rotten banana stem, Swezey + +. + + + + +A widely distributed species, throughout the tropics. Occurs in Hawaii and +Samoa +. Determined by L. L. Buchanan, +U. S. +National. Museum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B05FE7DFBFD04A7403C.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B05FE7DFBFD04A7403C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8c1d666fb5a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB21B05FE7DFBFD04A7403C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. + +Enochrus rubrocinctus +(Regimbart) + +. + + + + + + + + +Philydrus rubrocinctus +Regimbart +, + +Soc. Ent. +France +, Ann. + + +72 +: + +56 +, +1903 + +. + + + + + + + + + +Enochrits ritbrocinctus +(Regimbart) +Knisch +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +79 +): +214 +, +1924 + +. + + + + + + + +Agana, May 4, at light, Bryan; Agana Swamp, May 4, Usinger; Machanao, May +17, +Usinger; Piti, Aug. 20, at light, Sept. +7, +at light, Swezey. + + + + + +Described from +India +, +Cochin China +, +Burma +, Sumatra. Determined by L. L. Buchanan. ( +Guam +specimens compared with Baker Philippine collection at +U. S. +National Museum.) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB31B04FEC4F79205D24FF4.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB31B04FEC4F79205D24FF4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..42c6ee2cd29 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB31B04FEC4F79205D24FF4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +2. + +Tillus notatus +Klug + +, + + + + + + + +Mon. Cleridae +, +276 +, +1842 + +. + + + + + +Schenkling +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +23 +): +12 +, +1910 + +. + + + + + + + + + +Tillus bipartitus +Blanchard +, Voy. Pole Sud. + +4 +: + +59 +, pl. 4, fig. 13, +1853 + +. + + + + + + +Piti, Nov. 15, swept from bamboo, Swezey, +one specimen +. Fullaway, 1911. + + + + +This species was described from the East Indies, and also occurs in Sumatra, +Philippines +and +Japan +. The species + +bipartitus + +was described from +Guam +, but has been synonymized with + +notatus +. + +Determined by E. A. Chapin, +U. S. +National Museum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB31B04FEC5FD060312422F.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB31B04FEC5FD060312422F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ca1cd7b210f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB31B04FEC5FD060312422F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +3. +Dinoderus minutus (Fabricius) +. + + + + + + + + +Bostrichus minutus +Fabricius +, +Syst. Ent. +, +54 +, +1775 + +. + + + + + + + +Dinoderus minutus +(Fabricius) +Lesne +, + +Soc. Ent. +France +, Ann + +. +66 +: +323 +, 329, figs. 12, 17, 18,20,23,24,27, +1897 + + +. + + + + + +This cosmopolitan beetle was found infesting the bamboo shades on the porch of our residence at Piti, collected June 1, Swezey. Specimens determined by W. S. Fisher, +U. S. +National Museum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB31B04FEFAF9D505CA41CC.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB31B04FEFAF9D505CA41CC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a3d211116f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB31B04FEFAF9D505CA41CC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. + +Necrobia rufipes +(De Geer) + +. + + + + + + + + +Clerus rufipes +De Geer +, +Mem. Ins. + +5 +: + +165 +, +1775 + +. + + + + + + + +Necrobia rufipes +(De Geer) +Howard +and +Marlatt +, +U. S. Dept. Agric. +, ~ur. Ent. Bull. +4, +new ser.: +105 +, fig. 49, +1902 + + +. + + + + + +Piti, April 30, Swezey +; +Tarague, May 17, Swezey; Piti, June 1, Sept. 9, 21, 26, in house, Sept. 30, Oct. 10, at light, Swezey. Fullaway, 1911. + + + +This cosmopolitan beetle was present in great numbers in warehouse where copra was stored at Piti. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB31B04FEFAFB17048A43FA.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB31B04FEFAFB17048A43FA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7968b954d8f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB31B04FEFAFB17048A43FA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. + +Lasioderma serricorne +(Fabricius) + +. + + + + + + + + +Ptinus serricorne +Fabricius +, +Ent. Syst. + +1 +: + +241 +, +1792 + +. + + + + + + + +Lasioderma serricorne +(Fabricius) +Bandi +, +Berlin Ent. Zeitschrift + +17 +: + +333 +, +1874 + +. + +Pie +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +48 +): +57 +, +1912 + + +. + + + + +The cosmopolitan cigarette beetle was taken but once, a single specimen at Piti in the house, June 15, Swezey. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB41B02FE12F948038A448C.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB41B02FE12F948038A448C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9b21861b2e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB41B02FE12F948038A448C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +9. + +Telsimia nitida +Chapin + +, + + + + + + + + + + +Biol +. +Soc. + +Washington +, Proc + +. + +39 +: +131 +, +1926 + + +. + + + + + + +Piti, May 2, Sept. 17, Oct. 25, 29, Swezey; Upi Trail, May 5, Swezey; Inarajan, May 7, Swezey, Bryan; Mt. Alifan, May 21, Swezey; Agana, May 25, 30, Usinger, Swezey; Tumon, May 30, Swezey; Sinajana, June 8, 15, Swezey; Ypan, June 8, Usinger; Barrigada, June 12, July 6, Usinger, Swezey. + + + + +This tiny black ladybeetle was described from specimens collected in +Guam +in 1911 by Fullaway, and later by Edwards; Evans and Vandenberg. When + +Aspidiotus destructor + +was noted as injurious to coconut leaves in 1923, this ladybeetle was found associated with the scale. It was determined by Schultze as + +Cryptogonus orbiculus +var. +nigripennis + +. +Later, Bryant of the British Musett1n gave the name as + +Cryptogonus nigripennis +Weise. These + +names were used in reports of the +Guam +Agricultural Experiment Station. In 1927 it was reported to have effected complete control of the coconut scale in +Guam +. This control has continued, for in 1936 we found only scattered small infestations of the scale, and always the ladybeetles were present. + + +In November, the ladybeetles were found at Piti on bamboo infested with a different kind of scale, in sufficient munbers so that they were collected for shipment by Clipper plane to Honolulu. These were liberated on infestations of + +Pinnaspis buxi + +on + +Monstera + +at the Foster Park, and on coconut at Hanalei, Kauai. In both places they became well established. In about a year they became numerous enough at Hanalei so as to be collected for distribution. Determined by E. A. Chapin, U. S..National Museum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB41B03FE11FB9703E243D2.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB41B03FE11FB9703E243D2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ef24d9e8fd1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB41B03FE11FB9703E243D2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +7. + +Rodolia cardinalis +(Mulsant) + +. + + + + + + + + +Vedalia cardinalis +Mulsant +, +Spec. Coleopt. Trim. Securipalp. +, +906 +, +1850 + +. + + + + + + + +Novius cardinalis +(Mulsant) +Crotch +, +Rev. Coccinellidae +, +283 +, +1874 + +. + + + + + + + +Rodolia cardinalis +(Mulsant) +Essig +, +Insects of Western North America +, +415 +, +1926 + + +. + + + + + + +Tarague Beach, May 17, on + +Sophora tmnentosa +, + +Swezey, +one specimen +. + + + + + +This Australian ladybeetle was introduced into +Guam +from Honolulu in 1926 to combat the cottony cushion scale. In 1936 both were scarce, and only +one specimen +of the ladybeetle was obtained. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB41B03FE11FD23015945C3.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB41B03FE11FD23015945C3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..42ee8a82b8b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB41B03FE11FD23015945C3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +6. + +Azya luteipes +Mulsant + +, + + + + + + + +Spec. Coleopt. Trim. Securipalp. +, +928 +, +1850 + +. + +Crotch +, +Rev. Coccinellidae +, +279 +, +1874 + + +. + + + + + +Agana, June 2, Swezey; Sumay Road, June 2, Swezey; Orote Pen., Sept. 1, 27, Swezey; Merizo, Oct. 20, Swezey. + + + + +This tropical American ladybeetle was probably introduced into +Guam +from Honolulu at the same time as + +Cryptolaemus montrouzieri +, + +but there is no record of it. vVe found it occasionally in 1936. It feeds on soft scales. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB41B03FE13F9BB029B40E4.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB41B03FE13F9BB029B40E4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f6f6adb4f3e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB41B03FE13F9BB029B40E4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +8. + +Sticholotis punctatus +Crotch + +, + + + + + + + + + +Rev. Coccinellidae +, +201 +, +1874 + + +. + + + + + + +Agana, May 25, Swezey, +one specimen +. + + + + +This is a small Japanese ladybeetle, not previously recorded in +Guam +. It is not known whether it was purposely introduced. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEC5F7B802D64E91.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEC5F7B802D64E91.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ab4ef3576e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEC5F7B802D64E91.xml @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +Lindorus lophanthae +(Blaisdell) + +. + + + + +Two attempts to introduce this ladybeetle into +Guam +in 1925 and 1926 apparently failed to establish it, for we saw nothing of it in 1936. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEFAF68504644F89.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEFAF68504644F89.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a20320a67fc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEFAF68504644F89.xml @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +Apsectus + +species. + + + + + +Merizo, June 11, Swezey, +two specimens +of this small black clermestid. Determined by E. A. Chapin. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEFAF90705B941D4.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEFAF90705B941D4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9d93741dfb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEFAF90705B941D4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +12. + +Stethorus + +species. + + + + + +Piti, May 2, on mango, Swezey; Upi Trail, May 5, Swezey; Tumon, May 30, on +Ba.rringtonia, +Swezey; Barrigacla, June 12, Usinger, July 6, on + +Morinda, +Swezey. + + + + +A still smaller black species which was collected at several places. Determined by E. A. Chapin. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEFAFA0706B940B5.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEFAFA0706B940B5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..60cac5b679f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEFAFA0706B940B5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + + +11. +Pullus + +species. + + + + + + +Machanao, June 2, 30, Swezey, +two specimens +. + + + + + +A small black species. Determined by E. A. Chapin, +U. S. +National Museum. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEFAFD5305A043B0.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEFAFD5305A043B0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9501b4b3667 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB51B02FEFAFD5305A043B0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +10. + +Nephus + +species. + + + + + +Umatac, March 28, May 14, 28, Bryan, Swezey; Orote Pen., April 8, May 24, Bryan, Swezey; Piti, April 30, May 2, Usinger; Mt. Tenjo, May 3, Swezey; Agana, May 15, 30, Usinger, Swezey; Tarague, May 17, Usinger; Agat, May 31, Usinger; Machanao, June 4, Usinger; Sinajana, June 8, Usinger; Barrigada, June 14, Swezey; Mt. Alifan, June 19, Swezey; Fadian, Aug. 19, Swezey; Piti, Sept. 21, Nov. 6, Swezey; Agat, Oct. 17, Swezey; Tumon, Nov. 13, Swezey. + + + + +This is a small black ladybeetle with two reddish spots on the elytra. It occurs also in Hawaii where it was introduced from the +Philippines +. We found it in many places, and apparently it was responsible for the scarcity of the mealybug + +Ferrisia virgata +, + +as it was found associated with it as well as with other mealybugs. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB61B01FC56FA1403654040.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB61B01FC56FA1403654040.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..03f3bfb905a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB61B01FC56FA1403654040.xml @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +FAMILY +COCCINELLIDAE + + + + +The ladybeetles now occurring in +Guam +have apparently all been purposely introduced, though I have not found records of introduction for all of them. The following were collected in 1936. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB61B01FE1DFCD2055343A5.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB61B01FE1DFCD2055343A5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aff5b70a141 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB61B01FE1DFCD2055343A5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +Trochoideus desjardinsii +Guerin + +, + + + + + + + + +Rev +. +Zool +. + +, +22 +, +1838 + +. + + + + + + +Coquerel +, + +Soc. Ent. +France +, Ann. + +III, + +7 +: + +256 +, pl. 6, fig. 2, +1859 + +. + + + + + + +Yona, April 29, among dead leaves, Bryan; Mt. Tenjo, May 3, in dead rachis of + +Angiopteris evecta +, + +Swezey; Dededo, May 11, in rotten log, Swezey; Tarague, May 17, under coconut husk on ground, Swezey; Mt. Alifan, May 26, in log, Usinger; Agat, May 31, under bark, Usinger; Yigo, Oct. 21, in rbtten banana stem, Nov. 1.3,among dead papaya leaves, Swezey; Fullaway, 1911. + + + + + +This peculiar beetle occurs in South Asia, +Mauritius +, +Madagascar +, +Reunion +, New +Guinea +, +Philippines +. We found it common in +Guam +and widely distributed. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB61B01FE1EF92204EF4FCF.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB61B01FE1EF92204EF4FCF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fa24d6c218f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB61B01FE1EF92204EF4FCF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. + +Harmonia arcuata +(Fabricius) + +. + + + + + + + + +Coccinclla arcuata +Fabricius +, +Mant. Ins. + +1 +: + +55, +21 +, +1787 + +. + +Crotch +, +Revision Coccinellidae +, +110 +, +1874 + +. + + + + + + + +Harmonia octomaculata +var. +arcuata +(Fabricius) +Schultze +, +Philip. Jour. Sci. + +11 +, D: + +35 +, +1916 + +. + + + + + + +Harmonia arcuata +(Fabricius) + +Timberlake Ms. + + + + + + +Yigo, April +13, +Bryan; Inarajan, June 8, in rice field, Swezey, Usinger; Merizo, June 11, in corn field; Swezey; Barrigada, June 24, in corn field, Swezey; Dededo, Aug. 11, Swezey; Piti, Aug. 14, Oct. 1, Nov. 4, in corn field, Swezey; Merizo, Oct. 2, in rice field, Swezey; Yona, Nov. 18, on corn, Swezey. + + + + + +This large, spotted ladybeetle was found already present in +Guam +, by Fullaway, in 1911. There is no record of when it was introduced. It has a wide distribution: +China +, +Philippines +, +Singapore +, Java, Cape York, +New Caledonia +, Cape of Good Hope, Queensland, +Fiji +. It feeds on plant lice and is a very effective enemy of the corn aphis. It is often present in large numbers in corn fields infested with aphis. It is also found abundant in rice fields where it is reputed to feed on leafhoppers. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB61B01FE1EFE39017444D8.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB61B01FE1EFE39017444D8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c290cad8e18 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB61B01FE1EFE39017444D8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +Ocholissa humeralis (Fairmaire) +. + + + + + + + +Rhizophagus hunieralis +Fairmaire +, +Rev. Mag. Zool. +2 +: +55 +, +1850 + +. + + + + + + + +Ocholissa humeralis +(Fairmaire) +Grouvelle +, + +Soc. Ent. +France +, Ann. + +62 +: +385 +, +1893 + +. + +Arrow +, + +Ins. +Samoa + +4 +( +1 +): +52 +, +1927 + + +. + + + + + +A widely distributed species, black with a red spot on humeri of elytra. Occurs in +Samoa +, Tahiti, +Moluccas +, +Java +, Borneo, +Ceylon +, and +Madagascar +. We found it common in +Guam +, under bark of felled trees, in 1936. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB71B00FEF9FC5704094176.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB71B00FEF9FC5704094176.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aea420a35b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB71B00FEF9FC5704094176.xml @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +3. + +Coelophora inaequalis +(Fabricius) + +. + + + + + + + + +Coccinella inaequalis +Fabricius +, +Syst. Ent. +, +80 +, +1775 + +. + + + + + + + +Coelophora inaequalis +(Fabricius) +Mulsant +, +Spec. Coleopt. +, +404 +, +1851 + +. + +Crotch +, +Rev. Coccinellidae +, +153 +, +1874 + + +. + + + + + + +Umatac, March 28, Bryan; Magna, Mar. 31, Bryan; Orote Pen., April 9, Bryan; Piti, April 30, May 1, Oct. 2, 10, Nov. +7, +Usinger, Swezey; Upi Trail, May 5, Swezey; Inarajan, May 6, June 8, Sept. 30, Swezey, Usinger; Dededo, May 11, Usinger; Yona, May 12, Usinger; Agana, May 15, Swezey; Umatac, May 28, Swezey; Merizo, June 11, Swezey; Barrigada, June 14, 24, Swezey; Sinajana, June 15, Swezey; Talofofo, June +17 +,Nov. 18, Swezey; Mt. Alifan, June 19, Swezey; Machanao, June 30, Swezey; Fa<lian, Aug. 19, Swezey + +. + + + + +This nine-spotted ladybeetle has a very wide distribution from +Japan +and the +Philippines +through +Malaysia +to +New Caledonia +and Queensland. It is now recorded in +Guam +for the first time where it had no doubt been purposely introduced, but without being recorded. It feeds on plant lice. We found it common in corn fields and in rice fields, where it may have been feeding somewhat on young leafhoppers. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB71B00FEFEF8DB033A4F02.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB71B00FEFEF8DB033A4F02.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..864fde4cc83 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB71B00FEFEF8DB033A4F02.xml @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + +4. + +Anisolemnia mulsanti +(Montrouzier) + +. + + + + + + + + + + +Daulis mulsanti +Montrouzier +, + +Soc. Ent. +France +, Ann. + +IV, + +1 +: + +304 +, +1861 +. + + + + + + + + + +Coelophora mulsanti +(Montrouzier) +Crotch +, +Rev. Coccinellidae +, +152 +, +1874 + +. + + + + + + + +Anisoleninia mitlsanti +(Montrouzier) + +Timberlake Ms + + +. + + + + +Talofofo, April 11, Bryan; Merizo, June 11, Oct. 20, Usinger, Swezey; Sinajana, June 15, Swezey. + + + + +This is a rare ladybeetle in +Guam +. It was recorded by Fullaway in 1911. It was described from Woodlark Island, and is known in +Australia +. +Guam +specimens determined by P. H. Timberlake. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB71B00FEFEFEE306F34580.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB71B00FEFEFEE306F34580.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a323b484ff4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB71B00FEFEFEE306F34580.xml @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. +Coccinella transversalis Fabricius +, + + + + + + + + + + +Spec +. +Ins +. + +, + +97 +, + +1781 +; +Timberlake, Ms + +. + + + + + + + + + + +Coccinella repanda +Thunberg +, +Nov. Insect. Spec. +1 +: +18 +, fig. 25, +1781 + +. + + + + + + +Crotch +, +Rev. Coccinellidae +, +117 +, +1874 + +. + + + + + +Merizo, April 24, Bryan; Mt. Tenjo, May 3, Swezey; Piti, May 26, Usinger; Inarajan, Sept. 30, Swezey. + + + + +This is a smaller species than + +Harmonia arcuata +, + +and not so abundant in +Guam +. It was recorded under the name + +Coccinella repanda + +by Fullaway in 1911. It feeds on plant lice. We collected it in only a few places. This ladybeetle has a wide distribution from +China +, +India +, +Singapore +, Java to +New Caledonia +, Queensland, New South Wales, and Tasmania. It is not known when it first appeared in +Guam +. Our specimens were determined by P. H. Timberlake. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB71B03FEFDF6D503EB445D.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB71B03FEFDF6D503EB445D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d9db909bd78 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB71B03FEFDF6D503EB445D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +5. +Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant +, + + + + + + + + +Opusc +. +Ent +. + +3 +: +140 +, +1853 + + +. + + + + + + +Tiyan, April 2, Bryan; Orote Pen., April 8, Bryan; Upi Trail, May 5, Swezey; Inarajan, May 6, Usinger; Tumon, May 30, Swezey; Barrigada, June 14, Swezey; Mt. Alifan, June 19, Swezey; Dededo, Aug. +11, +Swezey. + + + + + +This Australian ladybeetle was introduced into +Guam +from Honolulu in 1926. It feeds on mealybugs and + +Pulvinaria. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0EFE6DF7AE038047E7.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0EFE6DF7AE038047E7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5d31e7c12c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0EFE6DF7AE038047E7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +4. + +Inopeplus metallescens +Fairmaire + +, + + + + + + + + + + +Soc. Ent. +France +, Ann. + +VI, + +1 + +: +254 +, + + + + + + +1881 +. + +Arrow +, + +Insects of +Samoa + + +4 +( +1 +): + +43 +, +1927 + +. + + + + + + + +We found this species abundant in +Guam +, under bark, especially at Machanao, June 4, where there was quite a clearing of felled trees which had attracted a good many insects, and in which many of the logs had loosened bark. About SO specimens were collected by Swezey and Usinger + +. + +Also collected at Barrigada, July 6, 22, under bark of + +Intsia bijuga, +Swezey. E. C. + +Zimmerman's determination + +. This species was described from +Fiji +. It also occurs in +Tonga +and +Samoa +. + + + + +Besides these species, there were about half a dozen species of cucujids +among miscellaneous +Coleoptera +sent for determination to the British Museum, and some of which yet remain to be reported on. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0FFE60FDD502774513.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0FFE60FDD502774513.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..df459076f7a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0FFE60FDD502774513.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +5. + +Haptoncus + +species. + + + + + + +Umatac, March 28, on beach shrubs, Bryan; Piti, May 30, Swezey; Merizo, June 11, on corn, Swezey; Piti, Sept. 21, on flowers of + +Leucaena glauca, +Swezey. Five + +specimens of an undetermined species + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0FFE61FC2E053F42F5.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0FFE61FC2E053F42F5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..29abac3ba1c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0FFE61FC2E053F42F5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. + +Cryptamorpha desjardinsi +(Guerin) + +. + + + + + + + + +Psammoerns desjardinsi +Guerin +, le. +Regn. An. Ins. +, +196 +, +1829 + +. + + + + + + + +Cryptamorpha desjardinsi +(Guerin) +Sharp +, + +Fauna +Hawaii + +. +3 +( +4 +): +428 +, +1908 +. + + + + + + + + +Piti, July +27, +on sugar cane, Swezey, +one specimen +of this cosmopolitan Rspecies. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0FFE62F9DC002E41CF.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0FFE62F9DC002E41CF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f2866ff32fb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0FFE62F9DC002E41CF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + +3. +Oryzaephilus surinamensis (Linnaeus) +. + + + + + + + + +Dermestes surinamensis +Linnaeus +, +Syst. Nat +., ed. 10, 357, +1758 + +. + + + + + + + +Silvanus surinamensis +(Linnaeus) +Sharp +, + +Fauna +Hawaii + +. +3 +( +4 +): +428 +, +1908 + +. + + + + + + + +Oryzaephilits sitrinamensis +(Linnaeus) +Hetschko +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +109 +): +68 +, +1930 + +. + + + + + + +Piti, April 30, May 26, in Grapenuts, July +S +, Nov. 9, in house, Swezey; Inarajan, May 14, Swezey; Yigo, Nov. 8, on corn, Swezey. + + + +This cosmopolitan species was found in the house, usually in food packages. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0FFE6DFB5203934073.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0FFE6DFB5203934073.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b8e89704e46 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB81B0FFE6DFB5203934073.xml @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. +Psammoecus insularis (Sharp) +. + + + + + + + + +Telephanus insularis +Sharp +, +Roy. Dublin Soc., Trans. +3 +: +143 +, +1885 + +. + + + + + + + +Psammoecus insularis +( +Sharp +), + +Fauna +Hawaii + +. +3 +( +4 +): +428 +, +1908 +. + + + + + + + + +Agana, May 15, Usinger; Machanao, June S, among dead leaves of a fallen tree, Usinger; Piti, July 21, on pumpkin vine, Sept. 26, Oct. +27, +in house, Swezey; +nine specimens +. Fullaway, 1911 + +. + + + +Described from the Hawaiian islands. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFD3FF71205CA4F9C.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFD3FF71205CA4F9C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cbab6a147d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFD3FF71205CA4F9C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +FAMILY +ORTHOPERIDAE + + + + +Species? + + + + +One small black beetle collected at Agana, May 25 on +Pithecolobiwm, +Usinger, was determined by E. A. Chapin of the +U. S. +National Museum as belonging to this family. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFEC1F95303964E4E.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFEC1F95303964E4E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c92af298234 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFEC1F95303964E4E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + +3. + +Neotrichus latiusculus +(Fairmaire) + +. + + + + + + + + + + +Ditoma latiusculus +Fairmaire +, + +Soc. Ent. +France +, Ann. + +VI, + +1 +: + +255 +, +1881 + +. + + + + + + + + +Neotrichtts latiusculus +(Fairmaire) +Arrow +, +Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. +VIII, + +4 +: + +193 +, +1909 + +. + +Arrow +, + +Ins. +Samoa + + +4 +( +1 +): + +48 +, +1927 + + +. + + + + + + +Upi Trail, May 5, under bark of + +Hibiscus tiliaceus +, + +Swezey; Mt. Alifan, May 26, in rotten log, Swezey; Barrigada, June 12, in rotten log; July 6, under bark, Swezey; Piti, Oct. 9, in dead orange twigs, Swezey; Libugon Farm, Nov. 10, under bark of dead orange tree, Swezey. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFEC4FAB4035240F2.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFEC4FAB4035240F2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74a7dd858e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFEC4FAB4035240F2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. + +Bitoma siccana +(Pascoe) + +. + + + + + + + + +Xuthia siccana +Pascoe +, +Jour. Ent +. + +2 +: + +128 +, pl. 8, fig. 1, +1863 + +. + + + + + + + +Bitoma siccana +(Pascoe) +Arrow +, +Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. +VIII, + +4 +: + +193 +, +1909 +. + + + +Ins. +Samoa + + +4 +( +1 +): + +48 +, +1927 + + +. + + + + + + +Agat, May 31, under bark, Usinger; Machanao, June +4, +under bark, Swezey; Fadian, Aug. 19, under bark of dead + +Annona reticulata, + +Swezey. + + + + + +A widely distributed species, known in +Samoa +, +New Caledonia +, +Christmas Island +, +Moluccas +, +Philippines +, Macassar, Sumatra, Malay Peninsula, +India +, +Seychelles +. We found a few in +Guam +in 1936. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFEF9FC1A04B342EA.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFEF9FC1A04B342EA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fca84ad642b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFEF9FC1A04B342EA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. + +Colobicus parilis +Pascoe + +, + + + + + + + + + + +Jour +. +Ent +. + + +1 + +: +202 +, +1860 + +. + + + + + + + + +Scott +, + +Fauna +Hawaii + +. + + +3 + +: +430 +, +1908 + +. + + + + + + +Machanao, June 4, under bark, Swezey; Barrigada, July 6, +exIntsia + +bijuga, + +Swezey; Yigo, Oct. 18, ex dead branch of small-leaved + +Ficus, + +Swezey. + + + + + +Widely distributed in East Indies, +Moluccas +, Borneo, +Philippines +, Assam, +Hongkong +, Hawaii, North +Australia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFEFEFDFD03BF4576.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFEFEFDFD03BF4576.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8c65d9d7a02 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFB91B0EFEFEFDFD03BF4576.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +Metophthalmus albofasciatus +Reitter + +, + + + + + + + +Deutsche Ent. Zeitschrift +, +23 +, +1891 + +. + +Hetschko +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +85 +): +19 +, +1926 + + +. + + + + + + +Machanao, June 30, sweeping dead twigs. and leaves of a felled tree, Swezey, +two specimens +. Determined by G. E. Bryant, British Museum + +. + + + + +A minute pretty species described from +Japan +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0CFE62F6930495478D.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0CFE62F6930495478D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ded8dcd3343 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0CFE62F6930495478D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. + +Melambia cordicollis +Reitter + +, + + + + + + + + + + +Verh +. +Nat. Ver. Bri.inn + +14 +: +25 +, pl. 1, fig. + +16 a, +1876 + + +. + + + + + + +Libugon Farm, Nov. 10, under loose bark of dead orange tree, Swezey, +four specimens +. + + +Described from the +Philippines +. +Guam +specimens determined by E. A. Chapin, +U. S. +National Museum. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE62F86E03414F30.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE62F86E03414F30.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f5a3797ab11 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE62F86E03414F30.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. + +Tenebroides mauritanicus +(Linnaeus) + +. + + + + + + + + +Trogosita mauritanica +Linnaeus +, +Syst. Nat. +, 10th ed., + +1 +: + +417 +, +1758 + +. + + + + + + + +Tenebroides mauritanicus +(Linnaeus) +Leveille +, +Coleopt. Catalog +. ( +11 +): +17 +, +1910 + + +. + + + + + +Piti, Aug. 27, in oat bin at stable of Root Agricultural School, Swezey, +one specimen +of this cosmopolitan insect. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE63F99203E34165.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE63F99203E34165.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1e1d58120c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE63F99203E34165.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +16. +Thamiaraea insigniventris Fauvel +, + + + + + + + +Mus. civ. stor. nat. Genova +, Ann. +12 +: +299 +, pl. 2, fig. 36, +1878 +. + + +Bernhauer +and +Scheerpeltz +, +Coleopt. Catalog +. ( +82 +): +682 +, +1926 + + +. + + + + + + +Asan, Aug. 22; Piti, Sept. 20, all from rotten breadfruit on the ground, Swezey, +17 specimens +. + + + + + +Described +from +New +Guinea +and +Celebes +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE6CFDBD04CB4534.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE6CFDBD04CB4534.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f940b0ace39 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE6CFDBD04CB4534.xml @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +13. +Gyrophaena moluccensis Fauvel +, + + + + + + + +Mus. civ. stor. nat. Genova, Ann. +12 +: +291 +, +1878 +. + + +Bernhauer +and +Scheerpeltz +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +82 +): +532 +, +1926 + + +. + + + + + + +Yona, May 12, +10 specimens +; Mt. Alifan, May 21, +one specimen +; all from fungus, Usinger. + + + + + +Described from +Moluccas +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE6DFBF502DE4033.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE6DFBF502DE4033.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1687853f22e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE6DFBF502DE4033.xml @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +15. +Homalota cribrum (Fauvel) +,. as now determined. + + + + + + + + +Thectura cribrum +Fauvel +, +Mus. +civ. stor. nat. Genova, +Ann. +12 +: +597 +, +1878 + +. + + + + + + + +Anoniognathus cribrum +(Fauvel) +Bernhauer +and +Scheerpeltz +, +Coleopt. Catalog +. ( +82 +): +254 +, +1926 + +. + + + + + + + +Piti, May 22, ex rotten breadfruit, Aug. 19, ex rotten bamboo sprouts, Swezey; Mt. Alifan, May 26, ex rotten papaya trunk, Usinger, June 27, ex rotten + +Pandanus + +fruit, Swezey; Dededo, Aug. 11, ex wild papaya, Swezey; Asan, Aug. 22, ex rotten breadfruit on ground, Swezey; +36 specimens +. + + + + + +Described from New +Guinea +, very abundant in +Guam +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE6DFC90052E422B.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE6DFC90052E422B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8b337ebbafb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBA1B0DFE6DFC90052E422B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +14. + +Gyrophaena variolosa +Fauvel + +, + + + + + + + +Mus. civ. stor. nat. Genova +, Ann. + +12 +: + +292 +, +1878 +. + + +Bernhauer +and +Scheerpeltz +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +82 +): +535 +, +1926 + + +. + + + + +Mt. Alifan, May 21, in fungus, Usinger. + + + +Described from New +Guinea +and Key Island. Six specimens collected in +Guam +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBB1B0CFE99FDF303BB423A.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBB1B0CFE99FDF303BB423A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7b73565393b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBB1B0CFE99FDF303BB423A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. +Urophorus humeralis (Fabricius) +. + + + + + + + + +Nitidula humeralis +Fabricius +, +Ent. Syst. +, suppl., +74 +, +1798 + +. + + + + + + + +Carpophilus humeralis +(Fabricius) +Fairmaire +, + +Soc. Ent. +France +, Ann. + +IV, +9 +: +199 +, +1869 + +. + +Grouvelle +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +56 +): +88 +, +1913 + +. + + + + + + + +Urophorus humeralis +(Fabricius) +Grouvelle +, +Col. Reg. Ind. +, +330 +, 336, +1908 + + +. + + + + + + +Piti, June +7, +on sugar cane infested with + +Pseudococrns boninsis +, + +Sept. 20, in rotten breadfruit, Nov. +7, +in rotten cucumbers, Swezey. + + + + + +A cosmopolitan species. Not found particularly abundant in +Guam +. Determined by E. A. Chapin, +U. S. +National Museum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBB1B0CFE9AFB9B03854089.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBB1B0CFE9AFB9B03854089.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5ca7481b2bf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBB1B0CFE9AFB9B03854089.xml @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. + +Carpophilus +vittiger Murray + +, + + + + + + + + + +Monogr. +, +373 +, +1864 +. + + +Grouvelle +, +Coleopt. + + +Catalog. ( +56 +): +85 +, +1913 + +. + + + + + + +Umatac, March 28, on beach shrubs, Bryan, May 28, Usinger; Piti, April 30, Swezey, May 2, in pods of + +Pithecolobium +dulce, + +Usinger, May 22, in rotten breadfruit, Swezey, June +7, +on sugar cane infested with + +Pseudococcus boninsis, +Swezey, Sept. + +20, in rotten breadfruit, Swezey; Dededo, May 11, under bark of dead +Pani:lanus, +Usinger; Agat, May 26, in ear of corn infested with corn earwonn, Swezey; Machanao, June 4, under bark, Swezey; Merizo, June 11, on corn, Swezey; Asan, Aug. 22, in rotten breadfruit, Swezey; Yigo, Nov. 8, 13, on corn, among dead papaya leaves and in seed cluster of an ornamental palm, Swezey. + + + + + +A cosmopolitan species which was very abundant in rotten fruits in +Guam +. Determined by G. E. Bryant, British Museum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBB1B0CFEE4F95701B64EEA.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBB1B0CFEE4F95701B64EEA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8a1f3f558f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBB1B0CFEE4F95701B64EEA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +3. + +Haptoncus luteolus +(Erichson) + +. + + + + + + + + +Epuraea luteola +Erichson +, +Germ. Zeitschr. + +4 +: + +272 +, +1843 + +. + +Horn +, +Am. Ent. Soc., Trans. + +7 +: + +301 +, +1879 + +. + + + + + + + +Haptoncus luteolus +(Erichson) Grouvelle, +Coleopt. +Catalog. ( +56 +): +96 +, +1913 + + +. + + + + + + +Mt. Alifan, May 26, Usinger, June 27, abundant in rotten + +Pandanus + +fruit on ground, Swezey; Piti, June +7, +on sugar cane infested with + +Pseudococcus boninsis + + +, +Aug. 3, under stone, Sept. 20, in rotten breadfruit on ground, Oct. 23, in rotten sugar cane, Swezey. Fullaway, 1911. + + + + +Another widely distributed species in the tropics, and abundant in +Guam +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBB1B0FFEE7F6B50207440A.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBB1B0FFEE7F6B50207440A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d3ba4999c2e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBB1B0FFEE7F6B50207440A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +4. + +Haptoncus ocularis +(Fairmaire) + + +. + + + + + + + +Epuraea ocularis +Fairmaire +, +Rev. Mag. Zoo +!. II, + +1 +: + +363 +, +1849 + +. + + + + + + + +Haptoncus ocularis +(Fairmaire) +Grouvelle +, +Coleopt. Catalog +. +1913 + + +. + + + + + + +Dededo, Aug. 11, ex wild papaya, Swezey; Fadian, Aug. 19, ex rotten seed of +Ochrocarpits obovalis, +Swezey; Asan, Aug. 22, in rotten breadfruit, Swezey. + + + +Distributed in Asia and the East Indies. Not abundantly collected in +Guam +. Determined by G. E. Bryant, British Museum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFCB9FC64059A424D.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFCB9FC64059A424D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ae82ab7b0ae --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFCB9FC64059A424D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +FAMILY +STAPHYLINIDAE + + + + +The determinations are by Max Bernhauer, the references and records by 0. H. Swezey. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE41FA3E039440B2.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE41FA3E039440B2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a8959b3b4fa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE41FA3E039440B2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +2. + +Espeson crenicollis +Fauvel + +, + + + + + + + +Mus. civ. stor. nat. Genova, Ann. + +12 +: + +196 +, pl. +1 +, fig. 16, +1878 + + +. + + + + + + +Agana, May 4, ex rotten + +Pandanus + +trunk, Swezey, Usinger; Piti, June 3, Usinger; +13 specimens +. + + + + +Described from Key Island and Gilolo. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE45FB6C04E9435E.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE45FB6C04E9435E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..888e9789447 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE45FB6C04E9435E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. +Lispinus foveatus Fauvel + +, + + + + + + + + +Mus +. +civ. stor. nat. +Genova, Ann +. + +12 +: + +204 +, +1878 + + + +. + + + + + + +Inarajan, May 14, Swezey, +two specimens +. + + + + + +Described from New +Guinea +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE46F91D03F14E5D.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE46F91D03F14E5D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0ae0dc11a66 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE46F91D03F14E5D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +3. + +Phloeonomus hebridensis +Bernhauer + +, + + + + + + + + + + +Stylops + + +3 + +: +18 +, +1934 + +. + + + + + + + + +Upi Trail +, +May +5, ex fig on ground, +Swezey +; +Santa Rosa +, +May +19, +Swezey +; +Piti +, +May +22, ex rotten breadfruit on ground; Nov. +7, +ex rotten bean pod, +Swezey +; +Barrigada +, +June +14, in trash under banyan tree, +Usinger +, +July +6, +Swezey +; +Mt. Alifan +, +June +27, +in + +Pandanus + +fruit on ground, +Swezey +; +Dededo +, Aug. 11, on wild papaya, +Swezey +; +Asan +, Aug. 22, in rotten breadfruit on ground, +Swezey +; +33 specimens + +. + + + + +Described from +New Hebrides +. Commonly found in +Guam +preying on scavenger insects in rotten fruits on the ground. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE47FD10018245AB.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE47FD10018245AB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..251b8a7eafd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE47FD10018245AB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +4. + +Bidessus gentilis +Sharp + +, + + + + + + + +Ent +. +Soc. London +, +Trans +., +344 +, +1890 + +. + + + +Zimmermann +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +71 +): +53 +, +1920 + +. + + + + + + + +Agana Swamp, May 4, Usinger, +five specimens +. (Determined by +J +. Balfour-Browne. One specimen retained for the British Museum.) + + + + + +Described from +Ceylon +. Collected on only one occasion i!]- +Guam +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE4DF73A03404FDA.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE4DF73A03404FDA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bc982497b30 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBC1B0BFE4DF73A03404FDA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +4. + +Phloeonomus singularis +(Kraatz) + +, variety (?). + + + + + + + + +Phloeonomus singulare +Kraatz +, +Arch. Naturgesch. + +25 +( +1 +): + +181 +, +1859 +. + + + + + + + + +Phloeonomus singulare +(Kraatz) +Bernhauer and Schubert +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +19 +): +59 +, +1910 +. + + + + + + + + +Machanao, June 4, from + +Pandanus, + +Swezey. + + + + + +The species was described from +Ceylon +. The single specimen I collected in +Guam +is labelled by Bernhauer "var.?". + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEE0FA6A02164097.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEE0FA6A02164097.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..108627f299a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEE0FA6A02164097.xml @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +9. + + +Leptacinus flavipennis +Kraatz + +, as now determined. + + + + + + + +Leptacinus parunipunctatus +var. +flavipennis +Kraatz, +Scheerpeltz +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +129 +): +1303 +, +1933 +. + + + + + + + + +Piti, Sept. 21, ex cow dung, Swezey, +one specimen +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEE1F81F06BF4EE3.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEE1F81F06BF4EE3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..af76a77094a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEE1F81F06BF4EE3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +11. + +Philonthus quisquiliarius +(Gyllenhall) + +. + + + + + + + + +(?) +quisquiliarius +Gyllenhall +, +Ins. Suec. + +2 +: + +335 +, +1810 +. + + + + + + + + +Philonthus quisquiliarius +(Gyllenhall) +Erichson +, +Kaf. Mark. Brandenb. + +1 +: + +469 +, +1839 +. + + +Bernhauer +and +Schubert +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +57 +): +352 +, +1914 +. + + + + + + + + +Piti, May 14, at light, July 27, Swezey, +two specimens +. A cosmopolitan species. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEE2FCCE01AC423A.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEE2FCCE01AC423A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d0220eda010 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEE2FCCE01AC423A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + +7. +Dibelonetes formosae Bernhauer + +, + + + + + + + +Arch. Naturg. Abt. A +, +88 +: +228 +, +1922 +. + + +Scheerpeltz +, +Coleopt. Catalog +. ( +129 +): +1229 +, +1933 + + +. + + + + + + +Piti, July 3, at light, Swezey, +one specimen +. Described from +Formosa +. + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEE6F97606B941B0.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEE6F97606B941B0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..57019bc2502 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEE6F97606B941B0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +10. +Philonthus discoideus Gravenhorst +, + + + + + + + +Col. Mier. Brunsv. +, +38 +, +1802 +. + + +Bernhauer +and +Schubert +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +57 +): +335 +, +1914 +. + + + + + + + + +Piti, April 27, Bryan, July 27, Swezey, +two specimens +. A cosmopolitan species. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEEDFB86040C436C.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEEDFB86040C436C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c41373fe974 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEEDFB86040C436C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + +8. + +Stilicopsis setigera +(Sharp) + + +. + + + + + + + +Acanthoglossa +(?) +setigera +Sharp +, +Ent. Soc. London, Trans. +, +67 +, +1874 +. + + + + + + + + +Stilicopsis setigera +(Sharp) +Bernhauer +and +Schubert +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +40 +): +220 +, +1912 + +. + + + + + + + +Asan, Aug. 22, in rotten breadfruit on ground, Swezey, +two specimens +. Described from +Japan +. + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEEDFDD60552456E.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEEDFDD60552456E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..becf1500bd6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEEDFDD60552456E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +6. + +Astenus horni +(Bernhauer) + +, as now determined. + + + + + + + + +Actobius horni +Bernhauer +, +Arch. Naturg., Abt. A +, +88 +: +231 +, +1922 +. + + +Scheerpeltz +, +Coleopt. Catalog +. ( +129 +): +1329 +, +1933 +. + + + + + + + +Piti, May 2, July 24, Aug. 24, Sept. 17, on weeds in cane field, Swezey, +eight specimens +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEEDFEE5011A47E8.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEEDFEE5011A47E8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7800a8be2b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0AFEEDFEE5011A47E8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + +5. + +Trogophloeus exiguus +Erichson + + +, + + + + + + + +Kaf. Mark Brandenb. +, +604 +, +1839 + +. + +Bernhauer and Schubert +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +29 +): +105 +, +1911 +. + + + + + + + + +Umatac, May 28, Usinger, +one specimen +. +A +cosmopolitan species. + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0DFEE6F6E003C847D1.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0DFEE6F6E003C847D1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b121e5c8889 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBD1B0DFEE6F6E003C847D1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + +12. +Oligota flavicornis Lacordaire +, + + + + + + + +Faun. Ent. Paris +1 +: +521 +, +1835 +. + + +Bernhauer +and +Scheerpeltz +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +82 +): +512 +, +1926 + +. + + + + + + + +Orote Point, July 19, Aug. 2, predacious on leaf mites on + +Ipomoea + +vines, Swezey, +13 specimens +. +A +European species. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBE1B08FE6CF6D804C847D7.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBE1B08FE6CF6D804C847D7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..863597def4f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBE1B08FE6CF6D804C847D7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. + +Colpodes +, + +new species +(?). + + + + + + +Piti, April 30, on leaves of + +Hibiscus tiliaceits +, + +Swezey; Piti, July 22, Aug. 19, at light, Swezey + +. + + +Four specimens of this shiny black species were obtained. The specimens were sent to the British Museum for determination and listed as + +" +Colpodes + +sp. +n.?", but none have been returned. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBE1B09FC6AF9A8053B40F0.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBE1B09FC6AF9A8053B40F0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..720cb42fcbf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBE1B09FC6AF9A8053B40F0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +FAMILY +CARABIDAE + + + + + +Only a very few specimens of this family of beetles were collected in +Guam +in 1936. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBE1B09FE6DF95F019B4F7C.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBE1B09FE6DF95F019B4F7C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1a69a520775 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBE1B09FE6DF95F019B4F7C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. + +Chlaenius flaviguttatus +var. +guttatus +Eschscholtz. + + + + + + + + + + +<emphasis box="[502,911,1820,1863]" italics="true" pageId="0" pageNumber="150">Chlaenius flaviguttatus</emphasis> + +Macleay +, +Annulosa Jav. +, +15 +, +1825 +. + + + + + + + + + +<emphasis box="[502,829,1871,1914]" italics="true" pageId="0" pageNumber="150">Chlaenius guttatus</emphasis> + +Eschscholtz +, +Zool. Atlas +( +5 +): +26 +, pl. 25, fig. 8, +1833 +. + + + + + + + + + +<emphasis box="[501,937,1922,1965]" italics="true" pageId="0" pageNumber="150">Lissauchenius biguttatus</emphasis> + +Montrouzier +, + +Soc. Ent. +France +, Ann. + +III, + +8 +: + +237 +, +1860 +. + + + + + + + + + +<emphasis box="[502,913,2026,2069]" italics="true" pageId="0" pageNumber="150">Chlaeniits flaviguttatus</emphasis> +var. +<emphasis box="[1014,1157,2026,2069]" italics="true" pageId="0" pageNumber="150">guttatus</emphasis> + +Eschscholtz, +Andrews +, + +Ins. +Samoa + + +4 + +( +1 +): +3 +, +1927 +. + + + + + + + + +Piti, Sept. 28, under old coconut husk in cow pasture, Swezey, +two specimens +; + + +Piti, Nov. 10, on lawn, Swezey, +one specimen + +. ( +Compared +with specimens in +Baker Philippine +collection at +U. S. +National Museum.)) + + + + + +This beetle was collected by Fullaway in 1911, and recorded as + +Chlaenius biguttatus +. + + +It occurs also in New +Guinea +, +New Caledonia +, and +Samoa +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEF1FA8A028A415B.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEF1FA8A028A415B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9247decbee6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEF1FA8A028A415B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +1. + +Cybister tripunctatus hamatus +(Montrouzier) + +. + + + + + + + + + +<emphasis box="[359,739,1393,1437]" italics="true" pageId="1" pageNumber="151">Dytiscus tripunctatus</emphasis> + +Olivier +, +Entomologie +3 +( +40 +): +14 +, pl. 3, fig. 24, +1795 +. + + + + + +<emphasis box="[360,739,1444,1487]" italics="true" pageId="1" pageNumber="151">Dytiscus tripimctatus</emphasis> +var. +<emphasis box="[838,983,1444,1487]" italics="true" pageId="1" pageNumber="151">harnatus</emphasis> + +Montrouzier +, +Soc. Agr. Lyon, Ann. + +7 +: + +9 +, +1857 +. + + + + + + + + +Cybister tripunctatus +var. +hamatus +(Montrouzier) +Zimmermann +, +Coleopt. Catalog. +( +71 +): +266 +, +1920 +. + + + + + + + + +Upi Trail, May 5, in concrete reservoir, Usinger, +one specimen +; + + +Inarajan, May 14, in rice field, Usinger, +one specimen +; + + +Piti, Aug. 9, in pail of rain water, Swezey, +one specimen +; + +Fullaway, 1911. (Determined by J. Balfour-Browne. One specimen retained at British Museum.) + + + + +The variety +hamatus +was described from Woodlark Island. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEF6F82F03624EF5.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEF6F82F03624EF5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9fffc04af43 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEF6F82F03624EF5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +2. + +Eretes sticticus +(Linnaeus) + +. + + + + + + + + +Dytiscus sticticus +Linnaeus +, +Syst. Nat +. +1 +( +2 +): +666 +, +1767 +. + + + + + + + + + +<emphasis box="[362,631,2047,2090]" italics="true" pageId="1" pageNumber="151">Eretes sticticus</emphasis> +(Linnaeus) + +Schultze +, +Philip. Jour. Sci. +11 +, D: +15 +, +1916 + + +. + + + + + + +Piti, May 23, Usinger; Agana Swamp, June 26, Usinger; +five specimens +. (Determined by +L. L. Buchanan +, +U. S. +National Museum.) + + + + + + +E. sticticus + +is a widely distributed species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEFCFC9A024145C7.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEFCFC9A024145C7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ce79d723eab --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEFCFC9A024145C7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +4. + +Tachys + +species. + + + + + + +One specimen of this tiny carabid was collected at Machanao, May 17, Usinger. It was determined as + +Tachys +sp. + +by E. B. Britton, but was lost off the pin point on the return trip from the British Museum + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEFDFBAA04DF4298.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEFDFBAA04DF4298.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2929ea16f88 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEFDFBAA04DF4298.xml @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +5. + +Lesticus + +species. + + + + + + +Machanao, June 30, Usinger, remains of +one specimen +(prothorax and elytra). Determined by E. B. Britton + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEFEFDBA038B4534.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEFEFDBA038B4534.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ad0ec3dfe79 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B08FEFEFDBA038B4534.xml @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + + +3. + +Endynomena pradieri + + +(Faim1aire). + + + + + + + + +<emphasis box="[356,706,574,616]" italics="true" pageId="1" pageNumber="151">Plochionus pradieri</emphasis> + +Fairmaire +, +Rev. Mag. Zool. +II, + +1 +: + +34 +, +1849 +. + + + + + + + + + +<emphasis box="[357,745,626,668]" italics="true" pageId="1" pageNumber="151">Endynomena pradieri</emphasis> +(Fairmaire) + +Andrews +, + +Ins. +Samoa + + +4 +(1): + +12 +, fig. 9, +1927 +. + + + + + + + + +Machanao, June 30, Usinger, +one specimen + +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B0BFEF4F74704314449.xml b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B0BFEF4F74704314449.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..32a7c596dc0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/87/376B87E5FFBF1B0BFEF4F74704314449.xml @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ + + + +Miscellaneous Families of Guam Coleoptera + + + +Author + +Swezey, O. H. +Experiment Station, Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, Honolulu + +text + + +1942 +1942-06-01 +Bernice P. Bishop Museum + +Honolulu, Hawaii + + + +Insects of Guam I + + + +150 +171 + + + +book chapter +http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5167701 +5f279ac2-63c6-4bd8-be9e-0e3d82b73ab2 +5167701 + + + + + +3. +Rhantus pulverosus Stephens +, + + + + + + + + + +Illus +. + +Brit. Ent. +2 +: +69 +, pl + + +. 12, fig. 2, +1828 +. + + + + + + + + + + +Zimmermann +, +Coleopt. Catalog +. ( +71 +): +204 +, +1920 + +. + + + + + + + + +<emphasis box="[365,699,2390,2433]" italics="true" pageId="1" pageNumber="151">Rhantus punctatus</emphasis> +Fourcroy + +, +Regimbart +, + +Soc. Ent. +France +, Ann. + +68 +: +306 +, +1899 + +. + + + + + + + +Upi Trail, May 5, in concrete reservoir, Usinger, +one specimen +. (Compared with specimens in Baker Philippine collection in +U. S. +National Museum.) + + + + + +A widely distributed species in Europe, North Africa, Asia, Sunda Islands, and +Australia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6B/BE/376BBE47C37451FAA3B56C01FD325163.xml b/data/37/6B/BE/376BBE47C37451FAA3B56C01FD325163.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d627dfaec9d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6B/BE/376BBE47C37451FAA3B56C01FD325163.xml @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ + + + +Nomenclatural changes in Coleus and Plectranthus (Lamiaceae): a tale of more than two genera + + + +Author + +Paton, Alan J. + + + +Author + +Mwanyambo, Montfort + + + +Author + +Govaerts, Rafael H. A. + + + +Author + +Smitha, Kokkaraniyil + + + +Author + +Suddee, Somran + + + +Author + +Phillipson, Peter B. + + + +Author + +Wilson, Trevor C. + + + +Author + +Forster, Paul I. + + + +Author + +Culham, Alastair + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2019 + +129 + + +1 +158 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.129.34988 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.129.34988 +1314-2003-129-1 +BF57C6B3C3065AEE9B4B3D47189C908F +3382366 + + + + + +Coleus grandidentatus ( +Guerke +) A.J.Paton + +comb. nov. + + + + +Plectranthus grandidentatus +Guerke +, Bull. Herb. Boissier 6: 554. 1898. Type: South Africa, Cape, East Griqualand, Emyembe Mt, April 1885, Tyson 1517 (lectotype: K, designated by +Codd (1975) +). + + + +Distribution. +S. Zimbabwe to South Africa. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6C/06/376C065E349039F81924944FB94E4051.xml b/data/37/6C/06/376C065E349039F81924944FB94E4051.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d85309a0149 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6C/06/376C065E349039F81924944FB94E4051.xml @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ + + + +Two genera of Mymaridae (Hymenoptera) new to Africa, a remarkable new species of Anaphes and new generic synonymy + + + +Author + +Huber, John T. + + + +Author + +Triapitsyn, Serguei V. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +658 + + +39 +61 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.658.11569 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.658.11569 +1313-2970-658-39 +DB1EBAB15A3645459BC46B24D648D46F + + + + +Anaphes Haliday, 1833 +Extensive synonymy given in Huber (1992). + + + +Type species. + +A formal decision by ICZN on the correct type species to use is pending so the species in not named here. See petition by +Huber et al. (2011) +and comments and corrigendum ( +Huber 2014 +). + + +The worldwide genus +Anaphes +contains a variety of species known as parasitoids of several insect orders, summarized in +Huber (1986) +. Features that define +Anaphes +include: fore wing with socketed seta present at apex of frenal fold; propodeum with a median longitudinal groove; petiole short, almost vertical, much wider than long crescent closely appressed to gt1; and gt1 longitudinally divided medially. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6C/7C/376C7CA5488697B0C409C7032A088553.xml b/data/37/6C/7C/376C7CA5488697B0C409C7032A088553.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a2e063cbfc5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6C/7C/376C7CA5488697B0C409C7032A088553.xml @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ + + + +A revision of the Chinese Gasteruptiidae (Hymenoptera, Evanioidea) + + + +Author + +Zhao, Ke-xin + + + +Author + +Achterberg, Cornelis van + + + +Author + +Xu, Zai-fu + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +237 + + +1 +123 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.237.3956 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.237.3956 +1313-2970-237-1 + + + + +Gasteruption subhamatum Pasteels, 1958 +Figs 265-272 + + + + +Gasteruption subhamatum +Pasteels, 1958: 206-207, fig. 28. + + + +Type material. + +Holotype, ♀ (USNM), "[E. Malaysia: Sabah], Borneo, Sandakan, Baker", +"Type" +, " +Gasteruption subhamatum +n. sp., J. Pasteels det., 1955". + + + +Additional material. +1 ♀ (SCAU), "[China:] Hainan, Mt. Jianfengling, 7.VI.2007, Jing-xian Liu"; 1 ♀ (SCAU), "[China:] Hainan, Mt. Diaoluo, 12-13.VII.2010, Hua-yan Chen". + + +Diagnosis. + +Apical fifth of ovipositor sheath ivory (Fig. 272); ovipositor sheath 1.1-1.2 times as long as body; occipital carina narrow and not lamelliform; head rather transverse in dorsal view; vertex slightly convex in front of occipital carina (Fig. 265); without a medio-posterior depression (Fig. 270); third antennal segment of both sexes about 3 times as long as wide; fourth antennal segment slender and about 1.6 times +as +long as third segment and third segment 1.7 times as long as second segment; frons and vertex shiny and superficially finely punctate; propleuron 1.2-1.4 times as long as mesoscutum in front of tegulae (Fig. 266); first discal cell of fore wing absent (Fig. 271); +hind +tibia weakly inflated and elongate (Fig. 268); second hind tarsal segment largely ivory; hind basitarsus elongate (Fig. 268); apical 0.4 of hypopygium incised, slit-shaped. + + + +Description. +Holotype, female, body length 13.9 mm, of fore wing 6.6 mm. +Head. Head rather transverse (Fig. 270); vertex shiny and superficially finely punctate, slightly convex and without a distinct depression medio-posteriorly; frons evenly convex, shiny and superficially finely punctate (Fig. 270); head directly narrowed behind eyes; temple 0.5 times as long as eye in dorsal view; fourth antennal segment 1.6 times as long as third segment and as long as second and third segments combined, fifth antennal segment 1.5 times as long as third segment, third antennal segment 1.7 times as long as second segment and 3.2 times as long as wide; occipital carina narrow, not lamelliform, straight and entirely black medio-dorsally (Fig. 265); OOL 1.3 times as long as diameter of posterior ocellus; face narrow (Fig. 269); minimum width of malar space 0.3 times as long as second antennal segment (Fig. 265); clypeus medially flat, medio-ventrally semi-circularly emarginate, without depression medio-ventrally, its lateral corners protruding forwards; eye glabrous. +Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.8 times its height; pronotal side rather low, ventrally sparsely finely punctate and dorsally densely and very finely punctulate, with a small acute antero-lateral protuberance (Fig. 266); mesoscutum slightly protruding anteriorly; propleuron slender (Fig. 266), 1.4 times as long as mesoscutum in front of tegulae; antesternal carina narrow and narrowly lamelliform; mesopleuron and metapleuron largely moderately regularly reticulate; mesoscutum with satin sheen, densely and finely punctulate and medio-posteriorly transversely rugose (Fig. 267); scutellum densely and finely punctulate; propodeum spaced reticulate. +Wings. Fore wing: first discal cell absent (Fig. 271), area glabrous; vein SR1 distinctly bent. +Legs. Hind coxa distinctly transversely rugose and with satin sheen dorsally, but laterally mainly punctulate; length of hind femur, tibia and basitarsus 5.4, 6.2 and 7.7 times their width, respectively (Fig. 268); middle tarsus 1.1 times as long as middle tibia; middle femur parallel-sided and slenderer than fore femur; hind femur slightly curved dorsally in lateral view. +Metasoma. Ovipositor sheath 1.2 times as long as body, 5.5 times as long as hind tibia and 1.7 times as long as metasoma; ivory part of ovipositor sheath 3.4 times as long as hind basitarsus; hypopygium slit-shaped incised apically. +Colour. Black-brown or dark brown; mandible (except dark teeth), palpi, tegulae, clypeus ventrally, fore and middle legs (but middle femur largely darkened, middle tibia dark brown medially, fore and middle tibiae basally and apically, 3 basal segments of fore tarsus and most of middle basitarsus ivory); subbasal patch of hind tibia, hind basitarsus (but basally dark brown) and second hind tarsal segment (but basally and apically with small dark brown patch) and apex of ovipositor sheath ivory; scape and antenna ventrally (except basally and apical segment) brown; wing membrane subhyaline; pterostigma dark brown. +Male. According to the original description similar to the female; third antennal segment 1.7 times second segment and fourth segment 1.8 times as long as third segment. + +Variation +. Body length 12.5-15.0 mm; propleuron 1.2-1.4 times as long as mesoscutum in front of tegulae; ovipositor sheath 1.0-1.2 times as long as body; ivory part of ovipositor sheath 3.0-3.4 times hind basitarsus; specimen from Hainan has also third hind tarsal segment ivory. + + + +Distribution. +China (Hainan); Malaysia (Sabah). + + +Biology. + +Unknown. Collected in +June-July +in China. + + + +Figures 265-272. +Gasteruption subhamatum +Pasteels, 1958, holotype, female. 265 head lateral 266 mesosoma lateral 267 mesoscutum dorsal 268 hind legs 269 head anterior 270 head dorsal 271 fore wing 272 apex of ovipositor sheath. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6C/87/376C87E3FFA18942F9C9FD467A0BFDA4.xml b/data/37/6C/87/376C87E3FFA18942F9C9FD467A0BFDA4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fb5f335113e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6C/87/376C87E3FFA18942F9C9FD467A0BFDA4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,549 @@ + + + +A new sisorid catfish of the genus Pseudolaguvia (Teleostei: Sisoridae) from Nagaland, north-eastern India + + + +Author + +Praveenraj, Jayasimhan +Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Island Agricultural Research Institute, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India- 744101. + + + +Author + +Vijayakrishnan, Balaji +0000-0002-1837-7274 +Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Island Agricultural Research Institute, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India- 744101. & A 1101, Synchronicity CHS, Lok Milan Colony, Chandivali, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India- 400072. balaji. vijaykrishnan @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 1837 - 7274 +balaji.vijaykrishnan@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Lima, Akum +Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Island Agricultural Research Institute, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India- 744101. & Department of Zoology, Fazl Ali College, Mokokchung, Nagaland, India- 798601. + + + +Author + +Gurumayum, Shantabala Devi +Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Island Agricultural Research Institute, Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India- 744101. & Zoological Survey of India, Arunachal Pradesh regional centre, Itanagar, India- 791113. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2021 + +2021-12-15 + + +5082 + + +1 + + +77 +86 + + + +journal article +2954 +10.11646/zootaxa.5082.1.7 +d62c6391-034f-4c3f-b2b4-89081547870b +1175-5326 +5783229 +26425A70-8417-40ED-A1F8-2DC981F37D31 + + + + + + + +Pseudolaguvia vespa + +, +new species + + + + + + +( +Figs. 1 +, +2a +, +3b +, +4 +) + + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Pseudolaguvia vespa + +, holotype, ZSI/APRC/P-1882, 30.6 mm SL; lateral, dorsal and ventral views. + + + + + + +Holotype +. + +ZSI/ +APRC +/P-1882, +30.6 mm +SL; +India +, +Nagaland +, +Mokokchung district +, +Tsücha River +, +Khar Village +; +26°27.59’ N +, +94°29.63’ E +; + +294.4m +asl + +.; +Lima +and team, + +21 April 2021 + +. + + + + +Paratype +. + +ZSI/ + +APRC +/P-1883, +8 ex. +, +28.6–31.5 mm +SL + +; + +CIARI +/FF-79, +1 ex. +, +29.5 mm +SL, cleared and stained. Collection data same as holotype + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Pseudolaguvia vespa + +differs from all its congeners except + +P. ribeiroi + +, + +P. spicula + +, + +P. shawi + +, + +P. nubila + +and + +P. jiyaensis + +by the following combination of characters: a shorter dorsal-fin spine (12.3–16.8% SL vs. 17.3– 29.0), a deeper caudal peduncle (9.0–10.5% SL vs. 6.5–9.2), deeper body (body depth at anus 15.6–17.7% SL vs. 11.0–15.2), shorter caudal fin (20.7–24.5% SL vs. 27.8–33.2), shorter pectoral fin (20.1–24.1% SL vs. 24.1–36.6), shorter interorbital distance (22.7–28.1% SL vs. 28.2–36.0). + +Pseudolaguvia vespa + +differs from + +P. ribeiroi + +in having a smooth (vs. serrated) anterior margin of the dorsal-fin spine, a deeper body (depth at anus 15.6–17.7% SL vs. 13.6–14.8) and a longer pectoral fin (20.1–24.17% SL vs. 13.6–15.4). + +Pseudolaguvia vespa + +is readily distinguished from + +P. shawi + +and + +P. nubila + +in having a greater pre-anal length (71.3–74.2% SL vs. 65.8–69.7) and more total vertebrae (33 vs. 31–32). It can further be differentiated from + +P. shawi + +in having the pectoral fin not reaching (vs. reaching) anterior origin of pelvic fin when adpressed and from + +P. nubila + +in having a shorter anal-fin base (12.1–14.6 % SL vs. 15.6–19.7). + +Pseudolaguvia vespa + +can also be differentiated from + +P. spicula + +in having a longer pectoral-fin spine (18.2–21.0% SL vs. 15.7–17.4), contrasting (vs. indistinct) banding on the body and a shorter interorbital distance (22.7–28.1% HL vs. 28.2–32.1). + + + +Pseudolaguvia vespa + +appears most similar to + +P. jiyaensis + +in colouration but can be readily distinguished from this species by the following characters: thoracic adhesive apparatus extending to midway between base of last pectoral-fin ray and pelvic-fin origin (vs. thoracic adhesive apparatus almost reaching pelvic-fin origin) ( +Fig. 2 +), a shorter head (25.9–29.2% SL vs. 30.3–33.3), posterior margin of the dorsal-fin spine with 3 serrae (vs. smooth), the region between lower lip and thoracic adhesive apparatus sparsely papillated (vs. densely papillated) ( +Fig. 3 +). + + + +FIGURE 2. +Ventral view showing details of thoracic adhesive apparatus in: a. + +Pseudolaguvia vespa +, ZSI + +/APRC/P-1882, holotype, 30.6 mm SL; b. + +P. jiyaensis +, CIARI + +/FF-76, 26.9 mm SL. Black line indicates posterior most extent of thoracic adhesive apparatus. Figure not to scale. + + + + +FIGURE 3. +Ventral view showing details of papillation in: a. + +Pseudolaguvia vespa +, ZSI + +/APRC/P-1882, holotype, 30.6 mm SL; b. + +P. jiyaensis +, CIARI + +/FF-76, 26.9 mm SL. Yellow line indicates the region between lower lip and thoracic adhesive apparatus. Figure not to scale. + + +Additional characters distinguishing it from other congeners are provided in the discussion. + + + +Description. +Morphometry data presented in table. 1. Head dorsoventrally depressed, body moderately compressed. Dorsal profile rising gently from tip of snout to origin of dorsal fin, then sloping gently ventrally to end of caudal peduncle. Ventral profile slightly concave from tip of snout to pelvic fin origin, then sloping gently dorsally to end of caudal peduncle. Supraoccipital spine nearly reaching nuchal shield. Snout slightly truncate when viewed dorsally. Weberian lamina well developed, slightly longer than supraoccipital spine, extending parallel to either side of spine. Eyes ovoid, horizontal axis longest and placed dorsally and entirely on posterior half of head. Gill slit narrow, extending from posttemporal to isthmus. Body with numerous tubercles except on thoracic adhesive apparatus and ray portion of the fins. Mouth subterminal, lips fleshy and papillated, region between lower lip and thoracic adhesive apparatus sparsely papillated, upper jaw projecting over lower jaw. Barbels in four pairs, upper lip continuing into maxillary barbel, with broad skin flap at base, extending almost close to base of pectoral-fin spine. Lateral mandibular barbel with moderately broad skin flap on dorsal margin, extending till 8 +th +branchiostegal ray; medial mandibular barbel broad and shorter, reaching to vertical through middle of eye orbit; nasal barbel very short and broad, extending to one-third distance between its base and anterior orbital margin. Thoracic adhesive apparatus moderately elliptical with a prominent central median depression, anterior portion moderately wide, narrow posteriorly, extending to midway between base of last pectoral-fin ray and pelvic-fin origin. + + + +TABLE 1. +Morphometric data for + +Pseudolaguvia vespa + +(n=10) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Morphometric charactersHolotype + +Range (includes paratypes and holotype) ( +n +=10) + + +Mean ± SD +
Standard length (mm)30.628.6–31.5
In percent of standard length
Predorsal length41.339.9–44.527.5±1.0
Preanal length72.271.3–74.272.8±1.1
Prepelvic length56.047.9–5653.0±2.6
Prepectoral length25.824.3–28.526.6±1.3
Length of dorsal fin base13.911.6–15.513.9±1.2
Dorsal-fin spine length15.312.3–16.814.8±1.2
Length of anal-fin base12.112.1–14.613.0±0.9
Pelvic-fin length16.613.2–16.615.1±1.1
Pectoral-fin length23.220.1–24.122.0±1.2
Pectoral fin spine length19.218.2–21.052.5±2.4
Caudal fin length22.420.7–24.519.7±1.0
Length of adipose-fin base15.612.1–17.815.0±1.8
Dorsal to adipose distance14.913.0–16.414.6±1.2
Post-adipose distance12.911.9–15.513.9±1.1
Caudal peduncle length15.214.6–18.216.3±1.2
Caudal peduncle depth9.09.0–10.59.7±0.5
Body depth at anus16.515.6–17.716.6±0.5
Head length28.225.9–29.227.5±1.0
Head width at pectoral fin origin25.219.7–25.323.1±2.0
Head depth just posterior to eye15.913.7–18.916.6±1.5
% HL
Snout length53.845.3–53.850.2±2.7
Interorbital width26.822.7–28.125.5±1.7
Eye diameter11.611.5–21.315.0±3.2
Nasal barbel length19.58.6–19.512.5±3.1
Maxillary barbel length47.747.7–62.957.9±4.9
Outer mandibular barbel length40.727.4–54.537.3±7.6
Inner mandibular barbel length31.123.6–34.328.3±3.7
+ +Dorsal fin located about two-fifths of standard length along body, with 5, i (1), 6, i*(2) or 6 (7) rays and straight margin. Dorsal spine straight, osseous and pointed, compressed laterally. Anterior margin of spine smooth and posterior margin with 3 serrae distally. Adipose fin short, anterior margin straight, posterior margin straight to slightly convex with incised posterior end, its origin slightly anterior to pelvic fin origin. Pectoral fin with strong, dorsoventrally depressed, pointed spine and 7*(2) or 8 (8) rays. Anterior margin of spine with 7* (2), 8 (2), 9 (6) moderate serrations, distally directed, becoming granular towards base; posterior margin with 5 (1) or 6* (9) large serrae, size decreasing towards base; tip of spine soft and flexible, accompanied by soft anterior and posterior serrae; tip of adpressed fin extending to vertical through base of third to last ray of dorsal fin. Pectoral girdle with prominent postcoracoid processes, hidden beneath skin, extending to midway between its base and pelvic-fin origin. Lateral line complete and midlateral. Pelvic fin with i, 4, i (2) or i, 5, i* (8) rays, anterior margin slightly convex, tip of adpressed fin extending beyond anus, but never reaching anal-fin origin. Anal fin with iv, 5, i* (5), iv, 6, i (4) or iv, or iv, 7, i (1) rays, its posterior margin slightly convex posterior margin straight. Caudal fin moderately forked with i, 14, i (10) principal rays; upper and lower lobes subequal, lower deeper in width than upper lobe, tip of upper lobe more pointed than lower. Basal margin of caudal fin rays with tubercules. Procurrent rays symmetrical, extending anteriorly only to hypural margin. Vertebrae 17+16=33 (1). + +Colouration. +In life ( +Fig. 4 +). Dorsolateral surface of head and body brown, occipital region dark-brown to black. Head and body pale-brown to chest nut coloured with numerous minute, brown to dark-brown spots scattered throughout, except ventral region between snout tip and pelvic-fin origin with few spots. The space between the ridges of thoracic adhesive apparatus also with minute pigmentation. Two prominent irregular chrome-yellow bands across body: one situated between dorsal and adipose fins and the other on caudal peduncle, former band twice as broad as latter at mid-dorsal. A pair of chrome-yellow spots on each side body just below dorsal-fin origin. One pair of large irregular chrome-yellow patches on upper and lower bases of first procurrent ray, upper patch smaller than lower. Dorsal fin dark-brown with chrome yellow distal margin. Adipose fin brown, anterior and posterior margin with small pale-yellow patch. Caudal fin with dark-brown base extending up to median rays, and an irregular subdistal brown band parallel to posterior edge of fin. Tips of upper and lower lobes hyaline, upper one smaller than lower. Pectoral, pelvic and anal fin translucently pale-yellow with brown bases and dark-brown transverse subdistal bands; the bands on pelvic fin very narrow. Nasal barbel brown with numerous black spots. Maxillary and outer mandibular barbels pale-yellow annulated with brown rings. Inner mandibular barbel creamy-white. In preservative ( +Fig. 1 +): colouration similar to live condition except the chrome-yellow to pale-yellow colouration on fins appears hyaline. + + + + +FIGURE 4. + +Pseudolaguvia vespa +, ZSI + +/APRC/P-1882, holotype, 30.6 mm SL, showing fresh colouration. + + + + +Distribution and habitat. + +Pseudolaguvia vespa + +is presently known only from the +type +locality in the Tsücha River, a tributary of the Milak River, a south bank tributary of the Brahmaputra River, Khar Village, Mokokchung district, +Nagaland +. Co-occurring species included + +Pterocryptis indicus + +, + +Balitora +sp. + +, + +Garra +sp. + +and + +Amblyceps apangi +. + + + + + +Etymology. +The specific name + +vespa + +is derived from the Latin, meaning wasp, in reference to the alternating chrome-yellow and brown stripes on the body resembling a wasp. Used as an adjective. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6D/3E/376D3E47202BE607FF88D2D25CB96FBD.xml b/data/37/6D/3E/376D3E47202BE607FF88D2D25CB96FBD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a024a1823a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6D/3E/376D3E47202BE607FF88D2D25CB96FBD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ + + + +An illustrated atlas of the vertebral morphology of extant non-caenophidian snakes, with special emphasis on the cloacal and caudal portions of the column + + + +Author + +Szyndlar, Zbigniew +Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Slawkowska 17, 31 - 016 Krakow, Poland + + + +Author + +Georgalis, Georgios L. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7759-6146 +Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Slawkowska 17, 31 - 016 Krakow, Poland +dimetrodon82@gmail.com + +text + + +Vertebrate Zoology + + +2023 + +2023-09-27 + + +73 + + +717 +886 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/vz.73.e101372 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/vz.73.e101372 +2625-8498-73-717 +8F3D5EDA2F184E5CA53E2F7741FF1339 +318B657A15AB5708B3C35FC1A82B4945 + + + + +Casarea Gray, 1842 + + + +Material examined. + + +Casarea dussumieri + +(Schlegel, 1837) (MNHN-AC-1993.3382; NHMUK 1992.996; UMMZ 190732). + + + +Description (Figs 58-62). + + +Trunk vertebrae +. + +Centrum as short as wide or somewhat longer; cotyle and condyle orbicular; neural arch moderately vaulted; posterior median notch of the neural arch deep; neural spine as high as long or slightly lower; prezygapophyseal accessory processes vestigial or very short; hypapophyses present throughout the trunk portion of the column, spine-like (more anterior vertebrae) to sigmoidal (more posterior vertebrae); paracotylar foramina present (occasionally even doubled from one side; see e.g., V 40 in Fig. +58 +). + + + +Figure 58. +Bolyeriidae +: + +Casarea dussumieri + +(MNHN-AC-1993.3382), trunk vertebrae. + + + + +Figure 59. +Bolyeriidae +: + +Casarea dussumieri + +(MNHN-AC-1993.3382), trunk vertebrae. + + + + +Figure 60. +Bolyeriidae +: + +Casarea dussumieri + +(MNHN-AC-1993.3382), trunk and cloacal vertebrae. + + + + +Figure 61. +Bolyeriidae +: + +Casarea dussumieri + +(MNHN-AC-1993.3382), cloacal and caudal vertebrae. + + + + +Figure 62. +Bolyeriidae +: + +Casarea dussumieri + +(UMMZ 190732), trunk and caudal vertebrae. + + + + +Trunk +/ +caudal transition + +. The last trunk vertebrae are provided with a prominent hypapophysis, relatively larger and thicker than those on the more anterior vertebrae. The hypapophysis is retained on the cloacal vertebrae, but becomes smaller. Paired haemapophyses appear on the first caudal vertebra. + + + +Number of vertebrae +. + + +Casarea dussumieri + +(MNHN-AC-1993.3382): 341 (228+3+110). Counts for the same specimen were previously published by +Hoffstetter (1960) +. + + +Data from literature (all for + +Casarea dussumieri + +): 225 trunk and cloacal vertebrae (a few anterior vertebrae missing) plus 126 caudal vertebrae ( +Alexander and Gans 1966 +); 228 trunk vertebrae plus 113 cloacal and caudal vertebrae ( +McDowell 1975 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6D/6B/376D6BDC80775D08E8C0332FCBB3CEA0.xml b/data/37/6D/6B/376D6BDC80775D08E8C0332FCBB3CEA0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..03c3c44a62c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6D/6B/376D6BDC80775D08E8C0332FCBB3CEA0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@ + + + +On Bulgarian sawflies, including a new species of Empria (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) + + + +Author + +Liston, Andrew +Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Eberswalder Str. 90, 15374 Muencheberg, Germany +andrew.liston@senckenberg.de + + + +Author + +Prous, Marko +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5329-7608 +Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Eberswalder Str. 90, 15374 Muencheberg, Germany & Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia + + + +Author + +Macek, Jan +Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusova 1740, 193 00 Praha - Horni Pocernice, Czech Republic + +text + + +Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift + + +2019 + +2019-06-14 + + +66 + + +1 + + +85 +105 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.66.34309 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.66.34309 +1860-1324-1-85 +6A252079088045A2A9203C0DFEAC79C5 +1AA06BAF62AD5064839E99F7B0A713A9 +3252231 + + + + +Empria tridens (Konow, 1896) * + + + +Material. + + +Varna +: +1♂ +(DEI-GISHym88776), +Tsonevo +5 km +S, + +100 m + +, +42.982N +, +27.451E +, +06.04.2018 + +. + +3♂ +(including DEI-GISHym88816, DEI-GISHym88736), +Staro Oryahovo +2 km +SW, + +120 m + +, +42.976N +, +27.787E +, +09.04.2018 + +. + +1♂ +, locality as previous, +11.04.2018 + +. + +2♂ +(DEI-GISHym31967, DEI-GISHym88857), +Dolni Chiflik +2 km +SE, + +50 m + +, +42.983N +, +27.743E +, +13.04.2018 + +. + + +The above specimens are unusually coloured. Abdominal terga (1-) 2-5 (-6) are more or less pale, including the normally black areas surrounding the pale unsclerotised patches (Fig. +38 +). The corresponding sterna are also more or less pale (Fig. +39 +). In life, the pale areas are whitish, and more conspicuous than in the pinned specimens, where the colour has become rather brown. No females were collected, so we cannot state whether this sex also exhibits unusual coloration in south-eastern +Bulgaria +. + +Empria tridens + +has a wide Palaearctic distribution ( +Prous et al. 2011b +). Penis valves are not distinguishable from other + +E. tridens + +and genetic data (based on one male DEI-GISHym88776, Fig. +16 +) does not indicate the existence of an additional species either (based on three genes, closest specimens are always other specimens of + +E. tridens + +that were studied by +Prous et al. 2019 +). + + + +Figures 38, 39. +Unusually coloured + +Empria tridens + +DEI-GISHym31967 male from +Bulgaria +. +38 +dorsal +39 +ventrolateral. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6D/79/376D79F29B3F10389E3AC429E40E69D6.xml b/data/37/6D/79/376D79F29B3F10389E3AC429E40E69D6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0c2b77ff0c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6D/79/376D79F29B3F10389E3AC429E40E69D6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,337 @@ + + + +The freshwater crabs of Danum Valley Conservation Area in Sabah, East Malaysia, with a description of a new species of Thelphusula Bott, 1969 (Crustacea, Brachyura, Gecarcinucidae, Potamidae, Sesarmidae) + + + +Author + +Ng, Peter K. L. + + + +Author + +Ng, Paul Y. C. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2018 + +760 + + +89 +112 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.760.24787 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.760.24787 +1313-2970-760-89 +A93EB14C1AD140AD8E8284C040350651 +A93EB14C1AD140AD8E8284C040350651 + + + + +Thelphusula capillodigitus +sp. n. +Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 + + + +Material examined. + +Holotype: male (23.9 +x +18.4 mm) (ZRC 2017.1294), coll. Danum Valley, Lahad Datu, Sabah, Borneo, Malaysia, 22 July 2017. Paratypes: 1 male (18.8 +x +15.5 mm) (ZRC 2017.1295), same data as holotype; 1 male (19.9 +x +16.4 mm) (ZRC 2009.0080), in pitfall trap, Danum Valley Research Centre, Sabah, coll. C. +Colon +, October 1996. Others: 3 juveniles (3.7 +x +3.0 mm, 6.5 +x +5.4 mm, 6.7 +x +5.5 mm), 1 young female (10.7 +x +9.1 mm) (ZRC 1990.0548-0551), Danum Valley Research Centre, Lahad Datu, Sabah, coll. R. Stuebing, 23 July 1989. + + + +Diagnosis. + +Carapace broader than long, not raised; dorsal surface with regions clearly demarcated; frontal median triangle absent (Figs 2 +A-C +, 3E); epibranchial tooth low, distinct, separated from external orbital tooth by shallow cleft; epigastric regions raised, rugose, not cristate; postorbital cristae low, distinct, rugose, not confluent with epigastric cristae, not reaching anterolateral margin; cervical grooves and H-shaped gastric depression deep; gastric regions with prominent transverse striae; antero- and posterolateral regions with strong oblique striae (Fig. 2A, B); median lobe on posterior margin of epistome triangular, tip rounded (Figs 2C, 3E). Third maxilliped with subrectangular ischium, distinctly longer than broad (Fig. 2D). Chelipeds with outer surface of palm almost smooth, dorsal and lateral surfaces of adult male dactylus covered with dense short setae (Fig. 3 +A-D +). Ambulatory legs not prominently elongate, dorsal margin of merus gently serrated (Figs 2A, 3 +F-I +). Thoracic sternum with surface evenly pitted to smooth, sternopleonal cavity reaching imaginary line joining anterior edges cheliped coxae (Fig. 2F, G); pleon distinctly T-shaped, somite 6 rectangular, slightly more than twice as long as broad, telson triangular, longer than broad (Fig. 2E, F). G1 relatively slender, almost straight; terminal segment approx. a quarter length of subterminal segment (Fig. 4 +A-C +). G2 approx. two-thirds length of G1, distal article short (Fig. 4D). + + + +Description of male holotype. + +Carapace broader than long, not raised; dorsal surface gently convex, regions clearly demarcated, covered with very short setae which does not obscure surface; frontal margin almost straight, without distinct median concavity, not deflexed, approx. a third carapace width; frontal median triangle absent (Figs 2 +A-C +, 3E); anterolateral margin not clearly separated from posterolateral margin; external orbital tooth low, broadly triangular; epibranchial tooth low but distinct, separated from external orbital tooth by shallow cleft; postfrontal surface slightly rugose; postorbital region surface; epigastric regions raised, rugose, not cristate, divided into 2 parts by narrow, deep median groove; postorbital cristae low but distinct, sharp, not confluent with epigastric cristae, not reaching anterolateral margin; cervical grooves and H-shaped gastric depression deep; gastric regions with prominent transverse striae; antero- and posterolateral regions with strong oblique striae; posterolateral margins concave, gently converging towards posterior carapace margin; posterior carapace margin straight (Fig. 2A, B); pterygostomial, suborbital, sub-branchial, and subhepatic regions covered with striae (Fig. 2C); orbits large, eyes occupying entire width, supra and suborbital margins entire, cristate; eyes pigmented, well developed, peduncle with low, sinuous median ridge (Fig. 2B, C); median lobe on posterior margin of epistome triangular, tip rounded, lateral margins sinuous (Figs 2C, 3C). + +Mandibular palp 2-segmented, terminal one distinctly bilobed. Third maxilliped covering majority of buccal cavity when closed; ischium subrectangular, distinctly longer than broad, with shallow submedian groove; merus quadrate, slightly broader than long; exopod long, slender, reaching median part of merus, flagellum long, exceeding width of merus (Fig. 2D). + +Chelipeds asymmetrical, right larger; surface of merus slightly rugose, relatively long, trigonal in cross section, margins without teeth or spines; carpus surface distinctly rugose, subovate, inner distal angle with sharp spine with basal tubercle; palm relatively stout, longer than broad, outer surface slightly rugose to almost smooth; fingers subequal in length to palm, dactylus marginally longer than pollex, curving inwards, cutting margin of fingers lined with numerous denticles, fingers pitted (Figs 2A, 3 +A-D +); dorsal and lateral surfaces of most of dactylus covered with dense short setae; lateral surface of pollex with mat of short, relatively less dense setae; tips of fingers strongly curved, corneous, glabrous (Fig. 3 +B-D +). + + +Ambulatory legs not prominently elongate, third pair longest, fourth leg shortest; segments laterally flattened laterally, surfaces mildly rugose; dorsal margin of merus gently serrated, no visible subdistal tooth; carpus of first to third legs with low median ridge, absent on carpus of fourth leg; margins of propodus and dactylus lined with numerous short spines (Figs 2A, 3 +F-I +). + +Thoracic sternum surface evenly pitted to smooth; sternites 1 and 2 completely fused forming triangular structure; suture separating sternites 2 and 3 relatively shallow, sinuous, medially convex with lateral parts concave (towards buccal cavity); sternites 3 and 4 completely fused; sternopleonal cavity almost reaching imaginary line joining anterior edges cheliped coxae, near suture between sternites 2 and 3; part of sternite 8 exposed when pleon closed; tubercle of male pleonal locking mechanism prominent, peg-like, on anterior third of sternite 5 (Fig. 2F, G). +Pleon distinctly T-shaped; somite 1 short, broad, reaching coxae of fourth ambulatory legs; somite 2 slightly longer than somite 1, as broad as somite 1; somite 3 short, broadest, with prominently convex lateral margins; somites 4 and 5 trapezoidal; somite 5 notably narrower than 4, trapezoidal with concave lateral margins; somite 6 rectangular, slightly more than twice as long as broad, lateral margins concave; telson triangular, longer than broad, tip rounded (Fig. 2E, F). + +G1 relatively slender, entire structure almost straight; terminal and subterminal segments clearly separated; terminal segment relatively short, approx. a quarter length of subterminal segment, cylindrical with tip tapering to subtruncate tip, margins with short stiff setae, surface just before tip with numerous squamiform setae; lower half of subterminal segment with numerous short setae (Fig. 4 +A-C +). G2 approx. two-thirds length of G1; basal segment long; distal segment short (Fig. 4D). + + + +Variation. +Unlike the male holotype (the largest specimen), the degree and extent of the setation on the fingers of the chelae of the two smaller paratype males are the same in both chelipeds. Male specimens less than 15 mm in carapace width do not have the setae on the fingers of the chelae. The outer surface of the chela in smaller specimens is also relatively more rugose compared to larger ones. + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from the Latin capillus for hair and digitus for finger. The name is used as a noun in apposition. + + +Colour. +In life, the carapace is mostly dark reddish brown; the sub-branchial regions, third maxillipeds, pleon and thoracic sternum is pale yellow; the ambulatory legs dark brown, faintly marmorated, with exception of pale yellow, faintly spotted merus; and the chelipeds are yellowish orange, with the inner surfaces paler and the setose patches on the surface of the male fingers light brown (Fig. 1). + + +Figure 1. +Thelphusula capillodigitus +sp. n., colour in life, holotype male (23.9 +x +18.4 mm) (ZRC 2017.1294), Sabah. A dorsal view B frontal view (photographs Dennis Sim). + + + + +Remarks. + +Thelphusula capillodigitus +sp. n. can easily be distinguished from all congeners by the adult male possessing dense setae on the dorsal surfaces of the fingers of the chelipeds (Fig. 3 +B-D +), a character also absent in genera allied to +Thelphusula +: +Adeleana +Bott, 1969, +Balssiathelphusa +Bott, 1969, +Stygothelphusa +Ng, 1989, +Arachnothelphusa +Ng, 1991, and +Coccusa +Tan & Ng, 1998 (cf. +Bott 1969 +, +1970 +; +Ng 1989b +, +1991 +; +Tan and Ng 1998 +; +Ng and Guinot 2014 +). The absence of a clearly discernible frontal median triangle is a character +T. capillodigitus +shares with +T. pueh +, +T. cristicervix +and +T. styx +, but it can be distinguished from them by the presence of setose patches on the fingers of the adult male chelipeds (Fig. 3 +B-D +) as well as a G1 which is only slightly curved with a relatively shorter terminal segment that is approx. a third the length of the subterminal segment (Fig. 4 +A-C +). In contrast, the G1s in +T. pueh +and +T. cristicervix +possess a prominently curved terminal segment which is proportionately longer, being approx. half the length of the subterminal segment (cf. +Ng and Grinang 2014 +: fig 3). In +T. styx +, the G1 has a relatively broader subterminal segment with the terminal segment distinctly upturned (cf. +Ng 1989a +: figs 2E, F). +Thelphusula capillodigitus +can further be distinguished from +T. styx +by its relatively more shallow cervical grooves which end at the H-shaped median depression with a level and straight frontal margin (Fig. 2B) (versus with deeper and distinctly longer cervical grooves that extend to the posterolateral region of the carapace, and the frontal margin deflexed in +T. styx +; cf. +Ng 1989a +: fig.1). The carapace of +T. capillodigitus +is gently convex (Fig. 2B, C) whereas in both +T. pueh +and +T. cristicervix +, the carapaces are distinctly inflated (cf. +Ng and Grinang 2014 +: figs 1C, 2C). In addition, +T. pueh +, +T. cristicervix +, and +T. styx +are only known from Sarawak. + + + +Figure 2. +Thelphusula capillodigitus +sp. n., holotype male (23.9 +x +18.4 mm) (ZRC 2017.1294), Sabah. A overall view B dorsal view of carapace C frontal view of cephalothorax D left third maxilliped E pleon F anterior thoracic sternum and pleon G sternopleonal cavity. + + + + +Figure 3. +Thelphusula capillodigitus +sp. n., holotype male (23.9 +x +18.4 mm) (ZRC 2017.1294), Sabah. A outer views of chelae B outer view of right chela C dorsal view of dactylus of right chela D surface of dactylus showing dense short setae E epistome +F-I +first to fourth ambulatory legs, respectively (all to same scale). + + + +In the general form of the carapace (not raised and relatively low) and relatively shorter ambulatory legs, +T. capillodigitus +most closely resembles +T. sabana +from Lahad Datu and +T. hulu +from the Maliau Basin, both in Sabah. Other than in the setose adult male cheliped fingers, +T. capillodigitus +can also be distinguished by the gastric regions prominently lined with transverse striae (Fig. 2B) (versus gastric regions rugose to smooth in +T. hulu +; cf. +Tan and Ng 1997 +: fig. 5); the absence of a frontal median triangle (Figs 2C, 3E) (versus frontal median triangle distinct in +T. hulu +; +Tan and Ng 1997 +: fig. 3B); the ischium of the third maxilliped being relatively longer (Fig. 2D) (versus ischium relatively shorter in +T. hulu +; cf. +Tan and Ng 1997 +: fig. 3D); the outer surface of chela being almost smooth (Fig. 3A, B) (versus covered with prominent striae and scattered granules in +T. hulu +; cf. +Tan and Ng 1997 +: fig. 3C); the male pleonal somite 6 being proportionately longer (Fig. 2E) (versus male pleonal somite 6 proportionately shorter in +T. hulu +; cf. +Tan and Ng 1997 +: fig. 4B); and the G1 being almost straight (Fig. 4 +A-C +) (versus G1 terminal segment strongly curved outwards in +T. hulu +; cf. +Tan and Ng 1997 +: fig. 4C, D). +Thelphusula capillodigitus +resembles +T. sabana +from Lahad Datu in possessing strong striae and granules on the carapace surface, but can be separated by lacking a frontal median triangle (Figs 2C, 3E) (versus frontal median triangle discernible but incomplete in +T. sabana +; cf. +Tan and Ng 1998 +: fig. 3C); the male pleonal somite 6 is proportionately longer (Fig. 2E) (versus male pleonal somite 6 proportionately shorter in +T. sabana +; cf. +Tan and Ng 1998 +: fig. 3B); and the G1 is almost straight with a short terminal segment (Fig. 4 +A-C +) (versus G1 prominently curved outwards with the terminal segment very long in +T. sabana +; cf. +Tan and Ng 1998 +: fig. 3 +D-G +). + + +Two other species of +Thelphusula +are present in Sabah, +T. dicerophilus +(which occurs in the same area as +T. capillodigitus +) and +T. tawauensis +which occurs to the east. +Thelphusula capillodigitus +can be separated from +T. dicerophilus +easily by its relatively flatter carapace (Fig. 2B, C) (versus carapace very high and raised in +T. dicerophilus +; Fig. 6B; cf. +Ng and Stuebing 1990 +: pl. 1B); and from +T. tawauensis +by the gastric regions covered with prominent striae and the frontal median triangle being absent (Figs 2C, 3E) (versus gastric regions smooth with the frontal median triangle prominent in +T. tawauensis +; cf. +Tan and Ng 1998 +: fig. 4A, C). + + + +Figure 4. +Thelphusula capillodigitus +sp. n., holotype male (23.9 +x +18.4 mm) (ZRC 2017.1294), Sabah. A left G1 (ventral view) B distal part of left G1 (ventral view) C distal part of left G1 (doral view) D left G2 (ventral view). Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, D); 0.5 mm (B, C). + + + +Thelphusula capillodigitus +was collected in a clear flowing shaded jungle stream with an average temperature range of 26-28 degrees Celsius and near neutral pH. All specimens were collected during the day, under rocks, and appear to be mostly aquatic in habits, although one specimen was collected from a pitfall trap (ZRC 2009.0080). +Parathelphusa valida +was also present in the same stream in larger numbers. The presence of a second species of +Thelphusula +in Danum Valley is not surprising, considering that +T. capillodigitus +has more aquatic habits than +T. dicerophilus +(see next species). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6D/DD/376DDDA657656AB501E74516C2D735FE.xml b/data/37/6D/DD/376DDDA657656AB501E74516C2D735FE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..def04a9fd3a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6D/DD/376DDDA657656AB501E74516C2D735FE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + +Inventory of the Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera) in Komaba Campus of the University of Tokyo, a highly urbanized area in Japan + + + +Author + +Ishikawa, Tadashi + + + +Author + +Saito, Masayuki U. + + + +Author + +Kishimoto-Yamada, Keiko + + + +Author + +Kato, Toshihide + + + +Author + +Kurashima, Osamu + + + +Author + +Ito, Motomi + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +4981 +4981 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4981 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4981 +1314-2828-3-4981 + + + + +Acanthosoma giganteum Matsumura, 1913 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +T. Ishikawa +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +1 male +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2014-01531; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1913; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hemiptera; family: Acanthosomatidae; genus: Acanthosoma; specificEpithet: giganteum; scientificNameAuthorship: Matsumura; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Tokyo; municipality: Meguro-ku; locality: +The University of Tokyo Campus, Komaba. +; minimumElevationInMeters: 31; maximumElevationInMeters: 39; decimalLatitude: +35.66006 +; decimalLongitude: +139.68521 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: T. Ishikawa; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: samplingProtocol: +net sweeping +; eventDate: +2013-10-30 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +KMUT +; collectionCode: +IC + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6E/1B/376E1B7D5552D8CF9368026E58C51F74.xml b/data/37/6E/1B/376E1B7D5552D8CF9368026E58C51F74.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..421fb002905 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6E/1B/376E1B7D5552D8CF9368026E58C51F74.xml @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Sciaena cappa +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + +S. capitis lateribus squamarum ordine duplici. @/D. {11/23}. P. 16. V. 1/6. A. {3/13}. C. 17. + + + +Habitat in M. +Mediterraneo. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6E/1F/376E1FFE7A160E39DF52C46F22EF4816.xml b/data/37/6E/1F/376E1FFE7A160E39DF52C46F22EF4816.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0becab312ca --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6E/1F/376E1FFE7A160E39DF52C46F22EF4816.xml @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Cylloceria melancholica (Gravenhorst, 1820) + + + + +Ichneumon melancholicus +Gravenhorst, 1820 + + +accusator +misidentification + + +defectiva +(Gravenhorst, 1829, +Lissonota +) + + +affinis +(Zetterstedt, 1838, +Bassus +) + + +marginator +Schiodte +, 1838 + + +denticornis +(Haliday, 1839, +Lampronota +) + + +fracticornis +(Haliday, 1839, +Lampronota +) + + +longicornis +(Ratzeburg, 1852, +Chalinocerus +) + + +marginatrix +(Schulz, 1906, +Lampronota +) + + +rugulosa +(Haupt, 1917, +Tropistes +) + + +altior +(Heinrich, 1953, +Chalinocerus +) + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6E/56/376E56B4575CF9661F52D46417E5C1A7.xml b/data/37/6E/56/376E56B4575CF9661F52D46417E5C1A7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..042b56b7b42 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6E/56/376E56B4575CF9661F52D46417E5C1A7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ + + + +Études myrmécologiques en 1886. + + + +Author + +Forel, A. + +text + + +Annales de la Societe Entomologique de Belgique + + +1886 + +30 + + +131 +215 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/3923/3923.pdf + +journal article +3923 +33E1E81D-6489-4D52-828D-DCA172BC7D97 + + + + +Esp. +P. longicornis Latr +. + + + +[[ worker ]] et [[ queen ]]. Nossi-be (Dr C. Keller). La [[ queen ]] repond a la description de Mayr: seulement l'ecusson est jaunatre et l'ecaille large, presque rectiligne au sommet. Les ailes manquent, +Scape: 1,6 mill. Valv. genit. ext. d'une nymphe [[ male ]] petites, arrondies au bout, ciliees, munies a leur face interne d'un lobe cache, longues comme les autres paires. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6E/A3/376EA348F7D194E26313C8FD7627F46F.xml b/data/37/6E/A3/376EA348F7D194E26313C8FD7627F46F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1922496912a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6E/A3/376EA348F7D194E26313C8FD7627F46F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +bousquety1@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-11-28 + + +245 + + +1 +1722 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 +1313-2970-245-1 +FFFF52503A0AFF882450FFB66D45FF8E +578462 + + + + +Pseudanophthalmus striatus (Motschulsky, 1862) + + + + +Anophthalmus striatus +Motschulsky, 1862b: 41. Type locality: "caverne des Mammouths [Edmonson County, Kentucky]" (original citation). One syntype in ZMMU (Keleinikova 1976: 218). + + +Anophthalmus interstitialis +Hubbard, 1880: 52. Type locality: +"Washington's +Hall in the Mammoth Cave [Edmonson County, Kentucky]" (original citation). Holotype [by monotypy] (♀) in USNM [# 23860]. Synonymy established with doubt by Horn (1883b: 272), confirmed by Jeannel (1928: 124). + + + +Distribution. +This species is known from several caves in Hart, Edmonson, Metcalf, and Warren Counties, southern Kentucky (Barr 2004: 32). + + +Records. + +USA +: KY + + + +Note. + +The MCZ holds a specimen [# 7397], incorrectly labeled lectotype, of + +Promecognathus interstitialis + +Hubbard from Cave City, Kentucky. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6F/A9/376FA91044D47FC2C259DD0EAFCDD1EC.xml b/data/37/6F/A9/376FA91044D47FC2C259DD0EAFCDD1EC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5ab132afd82 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6F/A9/376FA91044D47FC2C259DD0EAFCDD1EC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ + + + +Die Milbenfauna der Nordseeinsel Wangerooge + + + +Author + +Willmann, C. + +text + + +Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Meeresforschung Bremerhaven + + +1952 + +1 + + +139 +186 + + + + +http://unknown + +journal article +ORI11037 +1CD7624C-FC8F-4DD0-AA34-762D8FFB6267 + + + + +130. +Laelaps agilis C. L. Koch +1836. + + + + +Wirtstier: Die Waldmaus ( +Apodemus sylvaticus +), von 24 gefangenen +Waldmaeusen +waren 13 mit +L. agilis +besetzt. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/6F/AA/376FAAFBFF287A78500AE4104F6F18FA.xml b/data/37/6F/AA/376FAAFBFF287A78500AE4104F6F18FA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..989ea540783 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/6F/AA/376FAAFBFF287A78500AE4104F6F18FA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Sawflies, ' Symphyta' + + + +Author + +Liston, Andrew D. + + + +Author + +Knight, Guy T. + + + +Author + +Sheppard, David A. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1168 +1168 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 +1314-2828-2-1168 + + + + +Abia Leach, 1817 + + + + +ZARAEA +Leach, 1817 + + +AENOABIA +Kangas, 1946 + + +AUROABIA +Kangas, 1946 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/70/59/3770599995825C52A84B97182C251BFB.xml b/data/37/70/59/3770599995825C52A84B97182C251BFB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..72ac58df6f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/70/59/3770599995825C52A84B97182C251BFB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,574 @@ + + + +A taxonomic revision of the genus Selaginella (Selaginellaceae) from Nepal + + + +Author + +Shalimov, Aleksandr Petrovich + + + +Author + +Wu, Yu-Dong + + + +Author + +Zhang, Xian-Chun + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2019 + +133 + + +1 +76 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.133.37773 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.133.37773 +1314-2003-133-1 +99F75C9803D65C4880141BE7B6589FB5 + + + + +Selaginella chrysocaulos (Hook. & Grev.) Spring +Figs 5 + +(3 +A-C +), 10D + +, 26 + + + + +Selaginella chrysocaulos +(Hook. & Grev.) Spring, Bull. Acad. Roy. Sci. Bruxelles 10(1): 232, no. 141. 1843; +Iwatsuki 1975 +; +Iwatsuki 1988 +; +Dixit 1992 +; +Thapa 2002 +; +Zhang 2004 +; +Zhang et al. 2013 +; +Fraser-Jenkins et al. 2015 +; +Fraser-Jenkins et al. 2017 +. + +≡ Hook. & Grev., Bot. Misc. 2: 401. 1831. + +≡ +Lycopodioides chrysocaulos +(Hook. & Grev.) H.S. Kung, Fl. Sichuanica 6: 78, pl. 24. 1988. +Type. +NEPAL. +N. Wallich List +n. +127 +(holotype: K; isotype: E). + + += +Selaginella hypnoides +Spring, +Mem +. Acad. Roy. Sci. Belgique 24(2): 101. 1850. +Type. +INDIA. Himalaya, +Jacquemont +n. +1041 +(holotype: P [00523047]). + + += +Selaginella philippina var. khasiensis +Baker, J. Bot. 22: 298. 1884. +Type. +INDIA. Mt. Khasia, +Griffith +s.n. (holotype: K?). + + += +Selaginella rosenstockii +Hieron., Hedwigia 43: 22. 1904. +Type. +INDIA. India Orientalis: Simla in via Kangra, and Jammu and Kashmir, alt. s. m. inter 1000 et 3000 m. Jun.-Sept. 1856. +Schlagintweit +n. +13256 +(syntypes: S [ +S-P- +17948], B [200154162]); Himalaya loco accuratius non indicato, +Warburg 1005 +(syntype: B [20 0154160]); Ny nee Jal, s.m. c. 3000 m., +Strachey +, +Winterbottom 9 +(syntypes: B [20 0154159], [20 0154157]; Mussoorie, +Jameson +n. +582 +partim (syntype: B [20 0154156]; Simla, Regio Temp., +T. Thomson +s.n. (syntype: B [20 0154158]). + + + +Description. + +Stems 5-25 cm, evergreen or seasonally green, erect, with elongate tuber at base. Rhizophores restricted to base of stem or borne in lower part. Main stems branched from near base or from lower part upward, in basal part main stem 0.5-1 mm in diam. Stems stramineous, terete or subquadrangular, primary leafy branches 6-12 pairs, forked or once or twice pinnately branched, branchlets sparse. Axillary leaves asymmetrical, narrowly ovate or narrowly elliptic, 2-3 +x +1-1.4 mm, base exauriculate, in base margin ciliolate, apex blunt-acute. Ventral leaves asymmetrical, ovate-lanceolate, 1.4-2 +x +0.8-1.4 mm, leaves on branches slightly ascending or spreading, margin sparsely minutely denticulate or ciliolate at base, apex acute. Dorsal leaves asymmetrical, narrowly ovate, 0.6-1 +x +0.3-0.5 mm, base subcordate or obliquely cordate, carinate or not carinate, in basal part margin denticulate or ciliolate, apex acuminate or aristate. Strobili solitary, terminal, compact, 3-5 +x +1-1.5 mm. Sporophylls slightly or strongly dimorphic, ventral sporophylls ovate, margin denticulate; dorsal sporophylls with sporophyll-pteryx incomplete and ciliolate, margin ciliolate. Megaspores yellowish, surface verrucate; microspores orange, surface verrucate. + + + +Ecology. +On clay soil or on damp shaded banks in forest. Alt. 1400-2900 m. + + +Distribution in Nepal. +W, C, E. +Nepalese threatened status: not available data. + + +General distribution. +BHUTAN, CHINA (Guizhou, Sichuan, Xizang, Yunnan), INDIA (Darjeeling, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Jammu and Kashmir, Manipur, Meghalaya, Sikkim, Nagaland, Uttarakhand, West Bengal), MALAYSIA (Peninsular), MYANMAR, PAKISTAN, VIETNAM. + + +Chromosome number. + +2n=24 ( +Loyal 1976 +; +Loyal and Kumar 1984 +). + +Selected specimens examined: + +Nepal: "Ghunre, alt. 2400 m, 9 Jul 1972, +A. Maire +AMA +9 +" (E00670585); "9 Jul 1972, +A. Maire +, AMA +8 +" (E00754794). + + +W Nepal: MUGU +: "Dalupata, Carpinus faginea forest, aspect N 40°W, alt. 2220 m, Incination 35° (S8301), 1 Oct 1983, +H. Tabata +et al. +20718 +" (KYO, photo); "Between Toli and Rara, + +Aesculus indica + +forest along Khatyar Khola river, alt. 2400 m, 8 Sep 1983, +H. Tabata +et al. +24936 +" (KYO, photo). + + +C Nepal KATHMANDU +: "Chandragiri, near Thankot, Kathmandu, Nuwakot, c. 2000 m, 19 Nov 1988, +T. Nakaike 3855 +" (PE 01622152), "l.c. +3856 +" (PE 01593958), "l.c. +3860 +" (PE 01634004); "Siwapuri, Kathmandu, Nuwakot, alt. 2500 m, 23 Nov 1988, +T. Nakaike 3877 +" (PE 01593956); "Between Siwapuri and Burhanilkanth, Kathmandu, alt. 2000-2550 m, 24 Nov 1988, +T. Nakaike 3890 +" (PE 01593968); "Gokarna Ban, Kathmandu, alt. 1350 m, 29 Oct 1988, +T. Nakaike 3551 +" (PE 0162223). + + +NUWAKOT +: "Nuwakot: Tare Pati-Gul Bhanjyang, alt. c. 2100-3000 m, 25 Oct 1979, +T. Nakaike 324 +" (PE). + + +DOLAKHA +: "Jarsa-jiri above Sikri, Bagmati, alt. 8000 ft, 21 Sep 1968, +Banerjee +, +S. Shrestha 2850 +" (US, photo); "En route from Thore Pati, alt. 3560 m to Kutumsang, alt. 2500 m and Bhanjang, alt. 2150 m, alt. 2400 m, 9 Jun 1983, +H. Tabata +et al. +18475 +" (KYO, photo); "Rolwaling Khola, Simigaon (1950m)-Sekpa (2300m)-Kyalche (2700m), alt. 1950-2700 m, 31 Aug 1983, +H. Ohba +et al. +8331658 +" (TI, photo; KYO, photo); "near Manga decorah, alt. 7500 ft, 13 Sep 1964, +M.L. Banerjee +, +T.B. Shrestha +, +A.V. Upadhyaya 2739 +" (US, photo); "Khare Khola, Phedi Kharka (2100m)-Koplang (2100m)-Khanigaon (1700m), 14 Sep 1983, +M. Wakabayashi +, +M. Suzuki +, +A. Akiyama 8351514 +[ +862275 +]" (KYO, photo); "Near Jiri, Dolakha, c. 1800 m, 25 Oct 1988, +T. Nakaike 3546 +" (PE 01634006); Jiri, Dolakha, alt. 2000-2500 m, 3 Oct 1988, +T. Nakaike 3003 +" (PE 01593980); "Between Sivalaya and Jiri, Dolakha, alt. 1800-2000 m, 24 Oct 1988, +T. Nakaike 3527 +" (PE 01634003); "Between Jiri and Sivalaya, alt. 1800-2000 m, 5 Oct 1988, +T. Nakaike 3089 +" (PE 01593984); "Bhote Kosi, vers Simigaon, alt. 1450 m, 14 Sep 1954, +A. Zimmernann 1295 +" (KYO, photo). + + +SYANGJA +: "En route from Kare to Chandrakot, alt. 1350-1400 m, 22 Sep 1976, +Y. Suehiro 322 +" (KYO, photo). + + +SINDHUPALCHOK +: "above Golu, alt. 2588 m. +27°54'23"N +, +85°49'39"E +, 11 Sep 2011, +M.F. Watson +et al. EKSIN +74 +" (E00576125). + + +RASUWA +: "Between Dhunche and Bharku, c. 2000 m, 29 Aug 1986, +T. Nakaike 1156 +" (PE 01634001); "l.c. +1157 +" (PE 01634002); "Between Lama Hotel and Sharpugaon, c. 2600-2800 m, 3 Sep 1986, +T. Nakaike 1334 +" (PE 01593983), "l.c. +1333 +" (PE 01593977), "l.c. +1274 +" (PE 01593976)"; "Near Shabru, c. 2400 m, 6 Sep 1986, +T. Nakaike 1387 +" (PE 01593998); "Between Bharku and Syabru, c. 2000-2400 m, 29 Aug 1986, +T. Nakaike 1178 +" (PE 01593961). + + +KASKI +: "en route from Kare to Chandrakot, alt. 1350-1400 m, 22 Sep 1976, +Y. Suehiro 32 +( +III-1/1 +)" (PE); "Between Potana and Dhumpus, on the stonehedge, alt. 1850 m, 3 Aug 1983, +H. Tabata +et al. +19164 +" (KYO, photo). + + +KATHMANDU +: "Chandragiri, alt. 1600-2000 m, 9 Oct 1986, +T. Nak +aike +2474 +" (PE 01593957); "Jarkini, 1600-1700 m, 29 Sep 1986, +T. Nakaike 2005 +" (PE 01593964); "Tare Bhir, alt. 1400-1900 m, 4 Oct 1979, +T. Nakaike 56 +" (PE 01593970); "Bhangeri, alt. 1800-2100 m, 2 Oct 1986, +T. Nakaike 2284 +" (PE 01593972); "Sankhu, alt. 1400 m, 24 Aug 1986, +T. Nakaike 1058 +" (PE 01593962); "Tare Bhir, alt. c. 1400-1900 m, 4 Oct 1979, +T. Nakaike 105 +" (PE 01593965); "Tare Bhir, alt. 1500-2100 m, 30 Sep 1986, +T. Nakaike 2067 +" (PE 01593966); "Mulkharka, alt. c. 1700 m, 2 Oct 1986, +T. Nakaike 2329 +" (PE 01634008); + + +LALITPUR +: "Mt. Phulcoki, alt. 1800-2600 m, 17 Sep 1986, +T. Nakaike 1556 +" (PE 01634005); "Bajrajogini, alt. 1600 m, 2 Oct 1986, +T. Nakaike 2194 +" (PE 01593963); "Phulchoki, south of Kathmandu, on rather dry: ground in light shade, 1500 m, 15 Jun 1972, +H. Hara +et al. +852274 +" (TI photo; KYO; photo). + + +DHADING +: "Jamachok, alt. 1500-1800 m, 11 Oct 1986, +T. Nakaike 2518 +" (PE 01593979); "Jamachok, alt. 1500 m, 1 Oct 1986, +T. Nakaike 2150 +" (PE 01593971); "Kakani, alt. c. 2000 m, 29 Sep 1986, +T. Nakaike 1975 +" (PE 01593991); "l.c. +T. Nakaike 1972 +" (PE 01709395). + + +BHAKTAPUR +: "Nagarkot, alt. c. 1800 m, 16 Sep 1986, +T. Nakaike 1533 +" (PE 01593992). + + +MAKAWANPUR +: "Daman (between Naubise and Hetauda), c. 2400 m. 23 Sep 1986. +T. Nakaike 1861 +" (PE 01593973). + + +RAMECHAP +: "Between Bhandar and Kenja, alt. 1700-2100 m. 7 Oct 1988. +T. Nakaike +3203 (PE 01593974), "l.c. +3168 +" (PE 01593999), "l.c. +3207 +" (PE 01593975); "Bhandar (2300m)-Deorali (2700m)-Khasrubus (2400m)-Shivalaya (1800m), +27°34'N +, +86°20'E +- +27°36'N +, +86°17'E +, 6 Aug 1985, +H. Ohba +et al. +8580836 +" (TI, photo); "Between Sivalaya and Bhandar, alt. 1800-2500 m, 6 Oct 1988, +T. Nakaike 3125 +" (PE 01594000). + + +E Nepal: DHANKUTA +: "Dhankuta-Hilay-Murhay-Sinduwa, 22 Oct 1963, +M. Togashi +, +T. Tuyama s. n. +" (TI, photo). + + +SANKHUWASABHA +: "Khandbari (1150m)-Mani Bhanjyang (1150m)-Sekaha (1450m)-Botebus (1800m), alt. 1150-1800 m, 1954, +H. Ohashi +, +H. Kanai +" (KYO, photo); "Papung-Bir Gaon, along path in light shade, alt. 1600-2000 m, 30 Jun 1972, +H. Kanai +et al. +7253393 +" (KYO, photo); "Rive gauche de la Sun Kosi, en montaut a Chyaubaz, 1850 m, 7 Sep 1954, +A. Zimmermann +1082a" (KYO, photo; PE); "Above Shinbun-Hatia Gola, alt. 1600-2100 m, 3 Aug 1977, +H. Ohashi +et al. +771973 +" (TI, photo). + + +DHANKUTA +: "Dhankuta 1300 m - Nigale 1600 m, 4 Jun 1972, +K. Kanai +et al. +725057 +[ +872266 +, +872271 +]" (KYO, photo); "Sinduwa, alt. 1100 m, 24 Oct 1963, +H. Hara +et al." (KYO, photo); "Sinduwa, +27°04'N +, +87°23'E +, alt. 2400 m, 1 Aug 1973, +J.F. Dobremez +DBR NEP +1763 +" (E00670592), "l.c. +1750 +" (E00670593). + + +ILAM +: "Near Ilam, Ilam, alt. 1500-2000 m, 5 Nov 1988, +T. Nakaike 3671 +" (PE); "Mai Pokhari, +27°00'N +, +87°57'E +, alt. 2000 m, +J.F. Dobremez +DBR NEP +1227 +" (E00754786); "l.c. +1229 +" (E00670679, E00764780); "Partia Darjeling: Phalut 3600 m - Ratho Chu 2100 m - Ramam 2400 m, along path in dense forest, c. 2100 m, 4 Aug 1972, +K. Kanai +et al. +725717 +" (KYO, photo). + + +TAPLEJUNG +: "Ghatte-Khebang, 19 Nov 1963, +H. Hara +, +H. Kanai +, +S. Kurosawa +, +G. Murata +, +M. Togashi +, +T. Tuyama +" (KYO, photo); "Shewaden (2600 m)-Mewa Khola (2100 m)-Papung (2000 m), along path in light shade, alt. c. 2200 m, +H. Kanai +et al. +725350-C +" (KYO, photo); "Taplejung, +27°21'N +, +87°41'E +, alt. 2000 m, 06 Oct 1971, +J.F. Dobremez +DBR NEP +1344 +" (E00670571, E00754795). + + +TEHRATHUM +: "Dor 2600 m - Tute 2300 m, Jun 1972. +H. Kanai +et al. +725494 +" (KYO, photo); "Chittre, alt. 2200 m. +27°06'N +, +87°25'E +, 16 Aug 1972, +J.F. Dobremez +DBR NEP +1495 +" (E00670575), "l.c. +1507 +" (E00670576), "l.c. +1484 +" (E00670577). + + +SOLUKHUMBU +: "Between Basa and Junbesi, Solukhumbu, alt. 2600-3500 m, 16 Oct 1988, +T. Nakaike 3356 +" (PE 01593989); "Between Goem and Junbesi, Solukhumbu, alt. 3200-2650 m, 9 Oct 1988, +T. Nakaike 3243 +" (PE 016344007); "De Namche Bazar en direction de la Dudh Khosi (Monjo), alt. 2900 m, 17 Oct 1954, +A. Zimmermann 1735 +" (KYO, photo). + + +OKHALDHUNG +A: "Tarki a Okhaldunga, alt. 2000 m, 2 Nov 1954, +A. Zimmermann 1991 +" (KYO, photo). + + + +Figure 5. +Morphological diversity of the leaves of Nepalese + +Sealginella + +species + +1 +A-C + + +S. bisulcata + +( +Nakaike 3786 +, PE) + +2 +A-C + + +S. pennata + +( +Nakaike 3507 +, PE) + +3 +A-C + + +S. chrysocaulos + +( +Nakaike 1058 +, PE). A - Axillary leaves, B - Dorsal leaves, C - Ventral leaves. Scale bars: 0.2 mm. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/70/6B/37706BA3005E5218982DF4C4A95E2F27.xml b/data/37/70/6B/37706BA3005E5218982DF4C4A95E2F27.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..abba2dd171f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/70/6B/37706BA3005E5218982DF4C4A95E2F27.xml @@ -0,0 +1,274 @@ + + + +Revision of the Neotropical genus Trigava O'Brien, 1999 (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Dictyopharidae, Nersiini), with descriptions of two new species from Peru and Brazil + + + +Author + +Song, Zhi-Shun +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5449-4646 +Institute of Insect Resources and Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu Second Normal University, Nanjing, 210013 China + + + +Author + +O'Brien, Lois B. +Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Forbes 410, PO Box 210036, Tucson, AZ 85721 - 0036, USA + + + +Author + +Malenovsky, Igor +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8840-2263 +Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 2, CZ- 611 37, Brno, Czech Republic & Department of Entomology, Moravian Museum, Zelny trh 6, CZ- 659 37, Brno, Czech Republic + + + +Author + +Deckert, Juergen +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4211-4463 +Museum fuer Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115, Berlin, Germany + + + +Author + +Bartlett, Charles R. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9428-7337 +Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 250 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE 19716 - 2160, USA +bartlett@udel.edu + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2024 + +2024-01-03 + + +1188 + + +27 +45 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1188.89881 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1188.89881 +1313-2970-1188-27 +0009E8965A8F4522BE77B5A25995122F +E54C848A6ECE5CE1813ACC3F48516D8A + + + + +Trigava brachycephala (Melichar, 1912) + + + + +Figs 1A, B +, 2A, B, G +, 3A-J + + + + +Igava brachycephala +Melichar, 1912: 49, pl. II, figs 9, 11. + + +Igava brachycephala +Melichar: +Metcalf (1946) +: 39. + + +Trigava brachycephala +(Melichar): + +O'Brien +(1999) + +: 60. + + + +Type locality. +Peru, Department of Cuzco, Quispicanchi Province, Marcapata. + + +Emended description. + +Measurements +(in mm; 3♂, 1♀). Body length from apex of head to tip of tegmina: ♂ 10.8-11.1, ♀ 11.7; head length (includes: apex of cephalic process to constricted and curved part + from curved part to base of eyes): ♂♀ (0.2-0.3)+(0.6-0.7); head width including eyes: ♂ 1.4-1.5, ♀ 1.6; tegmen length: ♂ 9.0-9.3, ♀ 9.6. + + + +Coloration +. + +Head stramineous green, apical spot between intermediate carinae of frons black, intermediate carinae of frons reddish brown, lateral areas of head green. Pronotum and mesonotum stramineous green, upper lateral carinae of pronotum green. Tegmina and hindwings membrane hyaline, veins green to greenish yellow, pterostigmal area more or less greenish ochraceous. Legs yellowish brown, base, apex and apical spines of tibiae fuscous. Abdomen dorsally and ventrally greenish ochraceous. + + + +Structure +. + +Head with cephalic process very short, in lateral view (Fig. +3B +), strongly curved upward about 90° (or more than 90° in lectotype, Fig. +2A +) in front of eyes. Vertex (Fig. +3A +) broad, with ratio of length at midline to width between eyes (0.9-1.0):1. Frons (Fig. +3C +) flat, relatively broad, with ratio of length at midline to maximum width 2.0:1, intermediate and median carinae obscure. + + + +Male genitalia +. + +Pygofer in lateral view (Fig. +3E +) with ratio of ventral to dorsal width about 2.5:1; posterior margin produced angulately near middle. Gonostyles (Fig. +3F +) large and broad, dorsal process short, acute apically, more or less incurved and directed dorsoanteriad; hook-like process situated submedially, distinctly elevated above dorsal process, curved basad (Fig. +3G +). Aedeagus (Fig. +3H-J +) elongate, endosomal processes curved dorsoanteriad; phallobase sclerotized and pigmented at lateral sides, membranous and slightly inflated dorsally and ventrally: dorsal lobes V-shaped at apex, directed posteriad; a pair of lateral lobes large and elongate, base conical, directed anterolaterad, mostly tapering apicad, apex with a large long spine, directed posteriad; ventral lobes small, butterfly-shaped, base expanded laterad, with a minute tooth, apex produced in a pair of short and stout lobes, without spine, directed laterad. Segment X (Fig. +3D, E +), in dorsal view, lateral margins more or less convex near middle, with ratio of length to width near middle about 2.0:1. + + + +Female genitalia +. + +As in generic description. + + + +Type material examined. + +Lectotype +(here designated), ♂, (1) "Peru, Marcapata"; (2) " + +Enh. brachycephala + +[ +Melichar's +handwriting], det. Melichar"; (3) +"Typus" +[dark red label]; (4) "Collectio Dr. L. Melichar, +Moravske +museum Brno"; (5) "Syntypus, + +Igava brachycephala + +sp.n. Melichar, 1912, ♂ [P. +Lauterer's +handwriting], P. Lauterer det. 1991"; (7) "Syn- typus" [red label]; (7) "Invent. +c +. 4941/Ent., Mor. muzeum, Brno"; (8) " + +Trigava brachycephala + +[Zhi-Shun +Song's +handwriting] det. Z.S. Song 2014"; (9) "Lectotypus ♂, + +Igava brachycephala + +Melichar, 1912, designated by Z.S. Song & I. +Malenovsky +, 2023" [newly added red label] (MMBC; dry-mounted, glued on a rectangular card label, abdomen detached, macerated, preserved in glycerol and enclosed in a glass microvial placed on the same pin as the specimen). +Paralectotype +, 1♂, (1) "Peru S, Marcapata, Garlepp c."; (2) "Coll. A. Jacobi, 1912 - 3" [green label]; (3) " + +Trigava brachycephala + +" [handwriting]; (4) " + +Igava +Mel. + +" [handwriting]; (5) "Paralectotypus ♂, + +Igava brachycephala + +Melichar, 1912, labelled by I. +Malenovsky +, 2023" [newly added red label] (MTD). + + + +Other material examined. + + + +Peru + +: +1♂ +, "Peru, +S.V. Garlepp +"; " + +Igava brachycephala + +Mel. [ + +H. +Synave's + +handwriting], +H. Synave +det., 1969" (MFNB) + +; +1♂ +, +1♀ +, +"Peru" +(MTD). + + + +Distribution. +Southeastern Peru. + + +Remarks. + +Melichar (1912) +described + +Igava brachycephala + +Melichar based on material from "Peru, Marcapata (Garlepp) (Mus. Budapest, Dresden)". He did not state the number of the specimens he used for the description nor did he designate a holotype. One of his syntypes has been preserved in +Melichar's +personal collection in MMBC and we used this male specimen for the redescription of the species. According to Article 74 of ICZN (1999), we designate the specimen in MMBC as the lectotype for + +I. brachycephala + +to stabilize the nomenclature. Another conspecific male with collecting data fully matching the original description has been located by us in MTD and was labelled by us as a paralectotype. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/70/8C/37708C183055D4591E654EF51ADB0DE7.xml b/data/37/70/8C/37708C183055D4591E654EF51ADB0DE7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aea7bb5bb05 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/70/8C/37708C183055D4591E654EF51ADB0DE7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Physalis pruinosa +, +spec. nov. + + + +9. Physalis ramosissima, divaricationibus farinaceo-germinantibus. + + + +Habitat in +America +. ☉ + + + + +Facies +antecedentium 5. 6. 7. 8, sed antherae flavae, nec caeruleae; +rami +teretes: supra plani villosi; +Folia +villoso-viscosa; Alae ramificationum viridi quasi +pruina +germinant. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/70/97/377097A76D8EC4333D759D5FE0B23ECA.xml b/data/37/70/97/377097A76D8EC4333D759D5FE0B23ECA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bbaaf7bdec9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/70/97/377097A76D8EC4333D759D5FE0B23ECA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ + + + +Guide to the Vascular Flora of the Savannas and Flatwoods of Shaken Creek Preserve and Vicinity (Pender & Onslow Counties, North Carolina, U. S. A.) + + + +Author + +Thornhill, Robert + + + +Author + +Krings, Alexander + + + +Author + +Lindbo, David + + + +Author + +Stucky, Jon + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1099 +1099 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1099 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1099 +1314-2828-2-1099 + + + + +Rhynchospora ciliaris (Michx.) C. Mohr + + + +Distribution +Wet pine savannas (SPS-T, SPS-RF, WLPS, VWLPS), wet pine flatwoods (WPF-T). + + +Notes + +Frequent. +Jul-Sep +. Thornhill 397, 506, 511, 654 (NCSC). Specimens seen in the vicinity: Sandy Run [Hancock]: Taggart SARU 386 (WNC!); Sandy Run [Neck]: Wilbur 57609 (DUKE!). [= RAB, FNA, Weakley] + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/70/A6/3770A61D605C9911FF3DFB5246D7CDD5.xml b/data/37/70/A6/3770A61D605C9911FF3DFB5246D7CDD5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..23f67bd93cd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/70/A6/3770A61D605C9911FF3DFB5246D7CDD5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,260 @@ + + + +Two new species of Bucculatrix Zeller from southeast China (Lepidoptera: Bucculatricidae) + + + +Author + +Liu, Hongxia +0000-0002-3817-4204 +Kaili University, Kaili 556011, Guizhou, P. R. China. 395146117 @ qq. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 3817 - 4204 +395146117@qq.com + + + +Author + +Liu, Tengteng +College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, P. R. China. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2022 + +2022-02-17 + + +5100 + + +1 + + +137 +144 + + + +journal article +20601 +10.11646/zootaxa.5100.1.8 +6d800de7-a9e2-40fd-a759-ac16df1880b3 +1175-5326 +6127882 +C2F13915-704E-42B9-B385-062A5A9539B8 + + + + + + + +Bucculatrix nigerivalva + +sp. n. + + + + +DZNJẇfl +[Chinese name] + + + + +Figures 3, 3a +, +9–12 + + + + +Diagnosis +. The new species is closely related to + +B. crataega + +and the North American + +B. pomifoliella + +on the male genitalia. From + +B. crataega + +, the new species can be separated by: i) the strongly sclerotized and black distal part of the valva, ii) the furcated cornutus and iii) the almost semicircular vinculum; in + +B. crataega + +, the distal part of the valva is not as such strongly sclerotized and black ( +Fig. 7 +), the cornutus is composed of a series of micro spines ( +Fig. 8 +) and the vinculum is triangular on anterior margin ( +Fig. 7 +). From + +B. pomifoliella + +, the new species can be distinguished by: i) the cornutus composing of a series of micro spines and ii) the triangular vinculum ( +Braun 1963: 175 +, Fig. 228). + + + + +Type material +. + +Holotype +, +♂ +, +CHINA +, +Zhejiang province +, +Tianmu Mt. +, +30°20.27′N +, +119°24.34′E +, + +700 m + +, + +2018. vi.15 + +, leg. +Tengteng Liu +, registration SDNU. +Ent +000236 (genitalia and DNA barcode no. SDNU.LIU0156). + + + +Adult +( +Fig. 3 +). Forewing length +2.5 mm +. Face and frons white, scale tuft on vertex white, mixed with orange in central. Labial palpus minute and white. Antenna with eye cap white, posterior half with brown scales dorsally, first flagellomere notched in male ( +Fig. 3a +); flagellum blackish gray dorsally, 4 +th +to 7 +th +and 10 +th +to 13 +th +units counted from apex black dorsally. Legs yellowish white, black on outer surface of tibiae, with dense long yellow piliform scales on hind tibiae. Forewing ground color white, two golden costal streaks at basal 2/5 and 3/5, with scattered black scales near costa, outwards obliquely, jointed at apex of cell, the outer streak continue extending to tornus; a golden stripe along fold, below with a black dot at distal 2/5; a black dot above tornus; apical area golden; cilia grayish white, black distally around apex. Hind wing and cilia yellowish gray. Abdomen yellowish gray dorsally, yellowish white ventrally. + + + +FIGURES 4−8. Male genitalia of + + +Bucculatrix +spp. + +4 + +−6, + +B. coadnata + + +sp. n +. + +, holotype, slide no. SDNU.LIU0155; 4, genitalia excluding tegumen (ventral view); 5, tegumen (ventral view); 6, scale-sac. 7−8, + +B. crataega + +, holotype, SDNU.LIU0024; 7, genitalia excluding phallus (ventral view); 8, phallus. Scale bar for Figs 4, 5, 7, 8: 0.1 mm, for Fig. 6: 0.2 mm. + + + + + +FIGURES 9−12. Male genitalia of + +Bucculatrix nigerivalva + +sp. n. + +9−10, genitalia excluding phallus: 9, ventral view; 10, dorsal view, arrow indicating socii; 11, phallus; 12, scale-sac, slide no. SDNU.LIU0156. Scale bar for Figs 9−11: 0.1 mm, scale for Fig. 12: 0.2 mm. + + + +Male genitalia +( +Figs 9–12 +). Socii developed, about 1/3 length of tegumen, with sparse long setae ( +Fig. 10 +). Tegumen sclerotized on lateral margin, straight on posterior margin. +Valvae +not fused with each other, heavily sclerotized towards apex, black on distal part; bifurcated distally, ventral branch curved inwards distinctively, rounded apically, dorsal branch slightly curved inwards, narrowed towards apex, bluntly pointed apically. Vinculum almost semicircular, more sclerotized and slightly protruded anteriorly. Phallus about 2.5 times as long as length of valva + vinculum, basal 1/3 arched, median 1/3 straight, then curved by 150°, distal 1/3 straight; basal 2/3 spindle-shaped together with membranous phallobase; cornutus a sclerotized spine, about 1/7 length of phallus, unequally bifurcated and curved distally. Scale-sac broad and rounded ( +Fig. 12 +). + + + + +Distribution +. +China +( +Zhejiang +). Only known from the +type +locality. + + + + +Etymology +. The specific name is derived from the Latin adjective “ +niger +” and “ +valva +”, indicating the black distal part of the valva in the male genitalia. + + + + +Remarks. +This species is associated with + +B. bechsteinella + +group in the sense of +Baryshnikova (2008) +and is closest to + +B. pomifoliella + +on the basis of morphological characters. However, the genetic uncorrected distance between + +B. nigerivalva + +and + +B. pomifoliella + +is the largest among the species group ( +Table 2 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/70/A6/3770A61D605D9914FF3DFC5941A5CBDB.xml b/data/37/70/A6/3770A61D605D9914FF3DFC5941A5CBDB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3f68e30663e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/70/A6/3770A61D605D9914FF3DFC5941A5CBDB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@ + + + +Two new species of Bucculatrix Zeller from southeast China (Lepidoptera: Bucculatricidae) + + + +Author + +Liu, Hongxia +0000-0002-3817-4204 +Kaili University, Kaili 556011, Guizhou, P. R. China. 395146117 @ qq. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 3817 - 4204 +395146117@qq.com + + + +Author + +Liu, Tengteng +College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, P. R. China. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2022 + +2022-02-17 + + +5100 + + +1 + + +137 +144 + + + +journal article +20601 +10.11646/zootaxa.5100.1.8 +6d800de7-a9e2-40fd-a759-ac16df1880b3 +1175-5326 +6127882 +C2F13915-704E-42B9-B385-062A5A9539B8 + + + + + + + +Bucculatrix coadnata + +sp. n. + + + + +合NJẇfl +[Chinese name] + + + + +Figures 2, 2a +, +4–6 + + + + +FIGURES 2−3. Adult of + + +Bucculatrix +spp. + +2 + +, 2a, + +B. coadnata + + +sp. n. + +, holotype, registration SDNU.Ent000428. 3, 3a, + +B. nigerivalva + + +sp. n +. + +, holotype, registration SDNU.Ent000236. Scale bar for Figs 2 and 3: 2 mm, for Figs 2a and 3a: 0.2 mm. + + + + +Diagnosis +. The new species is similar to + +B. tsurubamella + +Kobayashi, Hirowatari +et +Kuroko, 2010 + + +, but can be distinguished by the following characters: i) the forewing is densely covered with brown scales, only a small part of which can be seen with white background, ii) the valvae are almost completely fused, and iii) the phallus is about twice as long as length of valva + vinculum. In + +B. tsurubamella + +, the forewing is white with a few orange or light orange-brown streaks and patches, the valvae are fused only on basal half, and the phallus is almost as long as valva ( + +Kobayashi +et al +. 2010: 42 + +, +Fig. 8F +). + + + + +Type material +. + +Holotype +♂ +, +CHINA +, +Jiangxi province +, +Longnan county +, +Anji Mt. +, +25°52.38′N +, +114°36.16′E +, + +1300 m + +, + +2018.v.25 + +, leg. +Tengteng Liu +, registration SDNU. +Ent +000428 (genitalia and DNA barcode no. SDNU. LIU0155). + + + +Adult +( +Fig. 2 +). Forewing length +2.5 mm +. Face dark gray, frons grayish white, scale tuft on vertex reddish brown, mixed with dark brown in central. Labial palpus minute, grayish white. Antenna with eye cap white, tinged reddish brown basally; first flagellomere notched in male ( +Fig. 2a +); flagellum white with distinct black ring on each unit, 6 +th +to 10 +th +and 13 +th +to 17 +th +units counted from apex black dorsally. Legs yellowish white, black on outer surface of tibiae, with dense long gray piliform scales on hind tibiae. Forewing ground color white, densely covered with brown scales; one costal streak on distal 2/5, dark brown, extending to tornus, with numerous black scales near costa and tornus on outer margin; area beyond preceding streak white with sparse brown scales; dorsum with a cluster of black scales mesally; cilia grayish, black distally around apex. Hind wing grayish brown, cilia gray. Abdomen gray dorsally, grayish white ventrally. + + +Male genitalia +( +Figs 4–6 +). Socii distinct, with several long setae ( +Fig. 5 +). Tegumen broad, more or less rectangular, length 1.5 times width; membranous ventrally, with micro spines. +Valvae +almost completely fused, with only a small notch at middle distally, cylindrical, twice longer than wide, with sparse setae on apex; basal process of costa slender, as long as vinculum. Vinculum somewhat triangular. Phallus thick and straight, about twice as long as length of valva + vinculum, phallobase membranous; cornutus indistinct. Scale-sac oval ( +Fig. 6 +). + + + + +Distribution +. +China +( +Jiangxi +). Only known from the +type +locality. + + + + +Etymology +. The specific name is derived from the Latin adjective “ +coadnatus +”, meaning fused, indicating the valvae of the male genitalia almost completely fused with each other. + + + + +Remarks. +DNA barcode analysis using a partial barcode did not assign this species to any proper group ( +Fig. 1 +). It may be related to + +B. ulmella + +group in the sense of +Baryshnikova (2008) +and group +10 in +the sense of + +Kobayashi +et al +. (2010) + +judged by the reduced valvae and the short and straight phallus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/71/18/377118E43BA1378F6F9785AA8B88DF80.xml b/data/37/71/18/377118E43BA1378F6F9785AA8B88DF80.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..17ccf36d0fe --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/71/18/377118E43BA1378F6F9785AA8B88DF80.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Family +Brachyceridae Billberg, 1820 + + + + +Brachycerides +Billberg, 1820a: 39 [stem: Brachycer-]. Type genus: +Brachycerus +A. G. Olivier, 1789. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/71/64/377164AE5B41F1540F28AA7301653B9D.xml b/data/37/71/64/377164AE5B41F1540F28AA7301653B9D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4491220bf63 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/71/64/377164AE5B41F1540F28AA7301653B9D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Faunistic diversity of spiders (Araneae) in Galichitsa mountain (FYR Macedonia) + + + +Author + +Deltshev, Christo + + + +Author + +Komnenov, Marjan + + + +Author + +Blagoev, Gergin + + + +Author + +Georgiev, Teodor + + + +Author + +Lazarov, Stoyan + + + +Author + +Stojkoska, Emilija + + + +Author + +Naumova, Maria + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2013 + +1 + + +977 +977 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 +1314-2828-1-977 + + + + +viaria +Microneta +Araneae +Arachnida +Arthropoda +Animalia + + + + +Microneta viaria (Blackwall, 1841) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +Occurrence: recordedBy: +C. Deltshev & G. Blagoev +; sex: +1 male +; Location: country: +FYR of Macedonia +; locality: +Galichitsa Mt., Resen +; verbatimElevation: 1000 m; Event: eventDate: +30-08-2002 + + + + +Distribution +Holarctic. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/71/D3/3771D3B6A68C11B41F5E1D21F1D27B0C.xml b/data/37/71/D3/3771D3B6A68C11B41F5E1D21F1D27B0C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4d3774c8075 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/71/D3/3771D3B6A68C11B41F5E1D21F1D27B0C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Pediculus apis +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + +P. Apis. � + +Frisch. ins. +8. +t. +16. + + + + +Habitat in +Apibus +ad squamulam halterum. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/71/EE/3771EEAE67755060B42FEFBCE79E2685.xml b/data/37/71/EE/3771EEAE67755060B42FEFBCE79E2685.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d9b53059e6e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/71/EE/3771EEAE67755060B42FEFBCE79E2685.xml @@ -0,0 +1,413 @@ + + + +A maximalist approach to the systematics of a biological control agent: Gryon aetherium Talamas, sp. nov. (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae) + + + +Author + +Talamas, Elijah J. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1048-6345 +Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA +elijah.talamas@fdacs.gov + + + +Author + +Bremer, Jonathan S. +Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA + + + +Author + +Moore, Matthew R. +Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA + + + +Author + +Bon, Marie-Claude +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5914-1682 +USDA-ARS-EBCL, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Lahey, Zachary +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9402-9570 +Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA + + + +Author + +Roberts, Cheryl G. +Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA + + + +Author + +Combee, Lynn A. +Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA + + + +Author + +McGathey, Natalie +Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA + + + +Author + +van Noort, Simon +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6930-9741 +Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, South Africa + + + +Author + +Timokhov, Alexander V. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7040-6290 +Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia + + + +Author + +Hougardy, Evelyne +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7537-470X +USDA-ARS-ISPH, Albany, CA, USA + + + +Author + +Hogg, Brian +USDA-ARS-ISPH, Albany, CA, USA + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2021 + +2021-12-23 + + +87 + + +323 +480 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.87.72842 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.87.72842 +1314-2607-87-323 +E343379ED04447ABA1ED47B3F01F3E59 +D03A96052A8550F9918BB08ACA344FB9 +5811493 + + + + +Gryon aetherium Talamas +sp. nov. + + + + +Figures 5 +, 9 +, 15-16 +, 54-57 +, 58 +, 59-66 +, 67-72. + + + +Description. +Color of body: dark brown to black. Color of legs: coxae and femora brown; trochanters, tibiae and tarsi yellow to pale brown. +Color of antenna in female: yellow to pale brown, A9-A12 generally darker than preceding antennomeres. + +Head +: Number of mandibular teeth: 2. Shape of mandibular teeth: large, teeth roughly equal in size. Shape of clypeus: projecting ventrally, apex flat to convex, with sharp lateral corners. Number of clypeal setae: 6. Epiclypeal carina: absent. Facial striae: present as lines of microsculpture. Central keel: present. Line of setae above interantennal process: absent. Malar striae: present as lines of microsculpture. Genal carina: absent. Hyperoccipital carina: absent. Anterior margin of occipital carina on gena: smooth. Occipital carina: present dorsally and in ventral portion of gena, absent or weakened posterodorsal to compound eye. + + +Mesosoma +: Epomial carina: absent. Sculpture of lateral pronotum: reticulate microsculpture. Netrion sulcus: absent. Mesoscutal suprahumeral sulcus: absent. Mesoscutal humeral sulcus: absent. Sculpture of mesoscutum: reticulate microsculpture. + +Sculpture of mesoscutellar disc: reticulate microsculpture. Posterior mesoscutellar sulcus: foveate. Posterior margin of mesoscutellum: extending over metanotum, metascutellum not visible in dorsal view. Posterior margin of metascutellum: slightly convex. Sculpture on posteroventral surface metascutellum: weakly rugulose. Sculpture of metanotal trough: foveate. Length of postmarginal vein in fore wing: about 1.5 times as long as stigmal vein. Length of marginal vein in fore wing: about half as long as stigmal vein. Wing color: hyaline with transverse band of infuscation posterior to marginal vein. Shape of submarginal vein: straight in basal 4/5, with dip proximal to reaching wing margin. +Lateral propodeal carina: continuous across posterior propodeum, forming flange around metasomal depression. Sculpture of metasomal depression: weakly rugulose. Sulcus of the propodeal foramen: foveate dorsally, absent ventrally. Cells or foveae along ventral margin of mesopleural carina: absent. Posterior limit of acetabulum: acetabular carina intersecting with ventral mesopleural carina. Postacetabular sulcus: foveate. Mesopleural epicoxal sulcus: foveate. Episternal foveae: present. Mesopleural carina: absent; present only at ventral apex of femoral depression. Sculpture of anteroventral mesopleuron: reticulate microsculpture. Sculpture of femoral depression: smooth. Prespecular sulcus: foveate. Sculpture of speculum: finely striate. Shape of subalar pit: circular. Mesepimeral sulcus: comprised of transverse foveae, foveae absent or reduced in size posterior to speculum. Sculpture of posterior mesepimeral area: smooth. Paracoxal sulcus: indicated by transverse foveae, extending below metapleural pit but not to ventral margin of metapleuron. Metapleural epicoxal sulcus: indicated by crenulae or indistinguishable from rugose sculpture. Metapleural structure: not divided into anterior and posterior areas. Sculpture of dorsal metapleural area: transversely striate. Sculpture of ventral metapleural area: irregularly rugose. + +Metasoma +: Macrosculpture of T1: longitudinally striate, smooth along posterior margin. Setation of T1: present lateral and posterior to lateral pit of T1. Setation of T2-T5: dense in lateral part of tergite, absent medially except for a transverse line of sparse setae along posterior margin. Posterior margin of T6: concave. Sculpture of T2-T4: finely reticulate with a smooth band along posterior margin. Sculpture of S2: finely reticulate. Setation of laterotergites: present. Transverse sulcus on anterior S2: present as a line of small foveae. + + + +Etymology. + +The species epithet " +Gryon aetherium +" derives from Latin, meaning of the sky or heavens, and refers to the unexpected appearance of this species in North America, far from its native range. + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Gryon aetherium + +is best separated from other + +Gryon + +species by the following characters: mesopleural carina entirely absent or present only at ventral apex of mesopleuron; posterior margin of mesoscutellum protruding posteriorly, concealing metascutellum and metanotal trough in dorsal view; mesopleuron with two episternal foveae; foveae of mesepimeral sulcus attenuating in size dorsally, foveae small or undefined posterior to speculum; acetabular carina and ventral mesopleural carina intersecting ventrally; metapleuron not transversely striate throughout; fore wing with infuscation posterior to marginal vein; hind tibia with four subgenual spines; lateral propodeal carina horizontal, extending laterally to metapleural carina. + + +In North America, + +Gryon aetherium + +is most similar to + +G. myrmecophilum + +, from which it is most easily separated by the mesopleural carina: complete in + +G. myrmecophilum + +, extending from the posteroventral apex of the femoral depression to the anterior margin of the mesopleuron; absent or present only at ventral apex of mesopleuron in + +G. aetherium + +. This character also serves well to separate + +G. aetherium + +from + +G. gonikopalense + +(Figures +77-78 +) + +G. fasciatum + +(73-76), and + +G. oligomerum + +Kononova, which are Old World species that are very similar to + +G. aetherium + +but have a complete mesopleural carina. + + + +Intraspecific variation. + +Non-target testing of + +G. aetherium + +in quarantine enabled us to examine how different hosts affect the phenotype of the parasitoids. Overall, we found very little variation between specimens of + +G. aetherium + +reared from + +Bagrada hilaris + +, + +Thyanta custator + +, + +Holcostethus + +, + +Banasa sordida + +and + +Euschistus conspersus + +(Figures +67 +, +69-72 +). The sculpture of the dorsal metapleural area varies from transversely striate to irregularly rugose. The foveae that comprise the mesepimeral sulcus decrease in size dorsally, and posterior to the speculum these foveae can be small and circular or poorly defined. Only one male specimen emerged from eggs of + +Banasa sordida + +(Figure +71 +), which was unusual in that the femoral depression was faintly microsculptured and the foveae of the paracoxal sulcus were shallow and not well-defined. This specimen also had malformed antennae, suggesting that + +Banasa sordida + +is not a suitable host for + +G. aetherium + +. + + + +Prior misidentifications. + + +Gryon aetherium + +was misidentified twice by the first author: as + +G. gonikopalense + +in +Martel et al. (2019) +and this name was subsequently used in +Martel and Sforza (2021) +, +Tofangsazi et al. (2020) +and +Hougardy and Hogg (2021) +, and as + +G. myrmecophilum + +in +Felipe-Victoriano et al. (2019) +. The morphological limits of + +G. aetherium + +were unclear at the time that these names were used, resulting in a hesitancy to describe it as a new species, especially because not all relevant types had been examined. + + + +Adventive populations. + +As implied by the previous paragraph, + +G. aetherium + +has been present in Mexico since at least June of 2018 and the study by +Felipe-Victoriano et al. (2019) +is thus the first record of this species in North America. It appears that + +G. aetherium + +has been in the United States for a similar length of time given that specimens were recovered from two locations in California: Davis, Yolo County, in 2020, and Monterey County, in 2018 and 2019. In both cases the specimens were reared from + +B. hilaris + +sentinel egg masses. A specimen from the 2018 collection (FSCA 00033319:PL11) was sequenced to confirm its identity (Figure +4 +). It differed from the quarantine populations by three base pairs, alleviating concerns that it represented escapees. The specimens collected in Monterey were stored in isopropanol, which affected the color of the specimens (Figure +68 +) and degraded the DNA. We were not able to amplify COI from the specimens collected in Monterey, but our morphological analysis using scanning electron microscopy finds them to be identical to the specimens in quarantine and those that were retrieved in Yolo County. In 2021, a population of + +G. aetherium + +was recovered in Chile, reared from the eggs of + +B. hilaris + +( + +Rojas-Galvez +et al. 2021 + +). + + + +Material examined. + + + +Holotype + +, female: + +Pakistan + +: +Punjab +, Toba Tek Singh, +Dabanwala +leg. +R. Mahmood +, coll. +5-9.IV.2016 +, ex. eggs + +Bagrada hilaris + +11-V-2016 +on mustard, introduced to quarantine for EBCL colony, PP8, USNMENT01335778 (deposited in USNM) + +. + + +Paratypes + +( +72 females +, +37 males +): + +Mexico + + +: + +9 females +, +3 males +, FSCA 000900442-00090443, 000900446-00090447, 000900468-00090475 (FSCA). + +Pakistan + + +: + +19 females +, +8 males +, FSCA 00033215-00091216, 00091221, 00094940-00094944, 00094984-00094992; USNMENT00989933, 01109043, 01109046-01109047, 01109049, 01109052, 01109054-01109155, 01335774, 01335776 (USNM). + +United States + + +: +44 females +, +26 males +, FSCA 00033319, 00090933, 00091210, 00091217,00091930, 00094869, 00094871, 00094873-00094874, 00094877, 00094885, 00094899, 00094901-00094903, 00094945- 00094981, 00094983, 00094993-00095009 (FSCA). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/72/1D/37721DAA89C253F989115B832CA7D52B.xml b/data/37/72/1D/37721DAA89C253F989115B832CA7D52B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c7cde927824 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/72/1D/37721DAA89C253F989115B832CA7D52B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +DNA barcoding aids in generating a preliminary checklist of the lichens and allied fungi of Calvert Island, British Columbia: Results from the 2018 Hakai Terrestrial BioBlitz + + + +Author + +McMullin, Richard Troy +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-2891 +Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, K 1 P 6 P 4, Canada +tmcmullin@nature.ca + + + +Author + +Simon, Andrew D. F. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-8974 +School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, V 8 P 5 C 2, Canada + + + +Author + +Brodo, Irwin M. +Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, K 1 P 6 P 4, Canada + + + +Author + +Wickham, Sara B. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8155-5689 +Hakai Institute, PO Box 309, Heriot Bay, British Columbia, VOP 1 H 0, Canada + + + +Author + +Bell-Doyon, Philip +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8144-8613 +Department of Biology, Universite Laval, Quebec, Quebec, G 1 V 0 A 6, Canada + + + +Author + +Kuzmina, Maria +Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N 1 G 2 W 1, Canada + + + +Author + +Starzomski, Brian M. +School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, V 8 P 5 C 2, Canada + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2024 + +2024-02-28 + + +12 + + +120292 +120292 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e120292 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e120292 +1314-2828-12-e120292 +37948F4E7CD256228E539899FB043CE2 + + + + +Arthonia atra (Pers.) A. Schneid. + + + +Materials + + +Type status: + +Other material +. + +Occurrence +: + +recordedBy: +R.T. McMullin +; occurrenceID: +D5EF128A-233B-5070-AA32-96C0DDC16538 +; + +Location +: + +locationID: XII; decimalLatitude: +51.66040 +; decimalLongitude: +-128.11688 +; + +Event +: + +habitat: +Corticolous on Thuja +plicata; + +Record Level +: + +institutionID: CANL; collectionID: +McMullin +19580 + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/72/33/3772338661B25D1E8C45DBBB48E5FA1D.xml b/data/37/72/33/3772338661B25D1E8C45DBBB48E5FA1D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5fe64405d3f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/72/33/3772338661B25D1E8C45DBBB48E5FA1D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@ + + + +A revision of European species of the genus Tetrastichus Haliday (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) using integrative taxonomy + + + +Author + +Hansson, Christer +The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom & Biological Museum (Entomology), Lund University, Lund, Sweden +christerdennis@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Schmidt, Stefan +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-8706 +SNSB-Zoologische Staatssammlung Muenchen, Munich, Germany +schmidt.s@snsb.de + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2020 + +2020-12-16 + + +8 + + +59177 +59177 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e59177 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e59177 +1314-2828-8-e59177 +AD70B3AB67634D2885F290988225C5C8 +2BC7CCC36D765F1C87ACBE8025DFD848 + + + + +Tetrastichus lacustrinus +sp. n. + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Holotype +. +Occurrence: +occurrenceDetails: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/API_Public/specimen?ids=BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-E06; catalogNumber: +BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-E06 +; recordNumber: BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-E06; recordedBy: +C.Hansson +; individualID: BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-E06; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +female +; lifeStage: +adult +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Tetrastichuslacustrinus; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; family: Eulophidae; genus: Tetrastichinae; taxonRemarks: Holotype deposited in MZLU; +Location: +country: +Sweden +; decimalLatitude: +55.802 +; decimalLongitude: +13.747 +; +Record Level: +type: PhysicalObject; language: en; institutionCode: +MZLU +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Paratype +. +Occurrence: +occurrenceDetails: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/API_Public/specimen?ids=BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-B11; catalogNumber: +BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-B11 +; recordNumber: BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-B11; recordedBy: +C.Hansson +; individualID: BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-B11; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +female +; lifeStage: +adult +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Tetrastichuslacustrinus; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; family: Eulophidae; genus: Tetrastichinae; +Location: +country: +Sweden +; decimalLatitude: +56.714 +; decimalLongitude: +16.763 +; +Record Level: +type: PhysicalObject; language: en; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Paratype +. +Occurrence: +occurrenceDetails: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/API_Public/specimen?ids=BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-E01; catalogNumber: +BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-E01 +; recordNumber: BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-E01; recordedBy: +C.Hansson +; individualID: BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-E01; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +female +; lifeStage: +adult +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Tetrastichuslacustrinus; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; family: Eulophidae; genus: Tetrastichinae; +Location: +country: +Sweden +; decimalLatitude: +55.834 +; decimalLongitude: +13.528 +; +Record Level: +type: PhysicalObject; language: en; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Paratype +. +Occurrence: +occurrenceDetails: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/API_Public/specimen?ids=BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-A09; catalogNumber: +BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-A09 +; recordNumber: BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-A09; recordedBy: +C.Hansson +; individualID: BC-ZSM-HYM-21587-A09; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +female +; lifeStage: +adult +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Tetrastichuslacustrinus; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; family: Eulophidae; genus: Tetrastichinae; +Location: +country: +Sweden +; decimalLatitude: +55.834 +; decimalLongitude: +13.528 +; +Record Level: +type: PhysicalObject; language: en; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Paratype +. +Occurrence: +occurrenceDetails: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/API_Public/specimen?ids=BC-ZSM-HYM-29813-D09; catalogNumber: +BC-ZSM-HYM-29813-D09 +; recordNumber: BC-ZSM-HYM-29813-D09; recordedBy: +C. Hansson +; individualID: BC-ZSM-HYM-29813-D09; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Tetrastichuslacustrinus; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hymenoptera; family: Eulophidae; genus: Tetrastichinae; +Location: +country: +Sweden +; decimalLatitude: +55.6833 +; decimalLongitude: +13.4833 +; +Record Level: +type: PhysicalObject; language: en; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Description + +FEMALE holotype (Fig. +9 +). Body length 1.9 mm (paratypes 1.7-1.9 mm). +Head +. Width/length (dorsal view) 2.4, width/length (frontal view) 1.2, POL/OOL 2.0, widths head/mesosoma 1.1, mouth width/malar space 1.0, malar space/eye height 0.8. +Antenna +. Scape length/eye height 1.0, pedicel+flagellum length/mesosoma width 1.2, length/width F1, F2, F3 2.0, 1.9, 1.4, clava length/width 2.8, lengths pedicel/F1 0.9, lengths F1/F2 1.1, F1/F3 1.3, lengths F1, F2, F3/clava 0.6, 0.5, 0.4, widths F1/pedicel (dorsal view) 1.3, lengths antennal spicule/C3 0.3. +Mesosoma +. Length/width 1.5, mesoscutal mid-lobe length/width (width measured in anterior part) 0.9, mid-lobe with median groove in posterior +1/2 +, with six adnotaular setae on each side, lengths mesoscutum/mesoscutellum (measured medially) 1.2, mesoscutellum length/width 0.8, length/width of enclosed space between submedian grooves 2.2, distance between SMG/distance between SMG and SLG 1.7, lengths dorsellum/propodeum (measured medially) 0.4, propodeum with strong reticulation, propodeal callus with five setae. +Fore wing +. Costal cell length/width 10.0, lengths costal cell/marginal vein 1.0, lengths marginal/stigmal veins 3.1. +Gaster +. Subcircular to ovate, length/width 1.5, lengths gaster/mesosoma 1.0, Gt7 length/width 0.5, length of longest cercal seta/next longest seta 1.8, longest seta almost straight, ovipositor sheaths not protruding beyond apex of Gt7. + +Colour. Body with weak coppery tinges, scape, flagellum and pedicel dark brown, tegulae dark brown, wings hyaline with veins yellowish-brown to brown, coxae black with metallic green tinges, trochanters dark brown, femora black, tibiae yellowish-brown, tarsi dark yellowish-brown to infuscate. +Variation. Paratypes with scape pale brown to yellowish-brown with dorsal edge brown, wing veins yellowish-white. + +MALE. Body length 1.2 mm. +Head +. Width/length (dorsal view) 2.1, width/length (frontal view) 1.3, mouth width/malar space 1.1, eye height/malar space 1.3, widths head/mesosoma 1.1. +Antenna +. F1-F4 with basal whorls of setae, these setae reaching beyond apex of flagellomere attached to, scape length/eye height 1.0, scape length/width 2.6, ventral plaque placed in central part of scape, lengths ventral plaque/scape 0.8, length/width F1, F2, F3, F4 1.7, 1.8, 1.5, 2.0, lengths pedicel/F1 1.0, lengths F1/F2 0.9, F1/F3 1.1, F1/F4 0.8. + + + +Diagnosis + +Female with antennal clava (incl. spicule) 2.8 +x +as long as wide; POL/OOL 2.0; distance between SMG 1.7 +x +distance SMG to SLG; ovipositor sheaths not protruding beyond apex of Gt7. + + + +Distribution +Sweden. + + +Ecology + + +Host +Unknown. + + +Notes +Holotype deposited in MZLU, paratypes in MZLU. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/72/53/377253DCA1DE53A29A5FA80F111FDBA0.xml b/data/37/72/53/377253DCA1DE53A29A5FA80F111FDBA0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9af9722f043 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/72/53/377253DCA1DE53A29A5FA80F111FDBA0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +A new species of Eusirus Krøyer, 1845 (Amphipoda, Amphilochidea, Eusiridae) from the seamount of the Caroline Plate, with redescription of Meteusiroides keyensis Pirlot, 1934 + + + +Author + +Wang, Yan-Rong +0000-0002-7188-4232 +Department of Marine Organism Taxonomy and Phylogeny, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China & College of Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China + + + +Author + +Sha, Zhong-Li +0000-0002-2192-3758 +Department of Marine Organism Taxonomy and Phylogeny, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China & College of Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China & Laoshan Laboratory, Qingdao 266237, China + + + +Author + +Ren, Xian-Qiu +Department of Marine Organism Taxonomy and Phylogeny, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China + +text + + +Zoosystematics and Evolution + + +2024 + +2024-05-23 + + +100 + + +2 + + +645 +662 + + + +journal article +10.3897/zse.100.114758 +938B8E54-3E6F-4281-83CE-E3D32393F8F3 + + + + +Genus + +Eusirus +Krøyer, 1845 + + + + + +Diagnosis. + + +See +Barnard and Karaman (1991) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/72/6D/37726D62AD7380472B7B4665F1721192.xml b/data/37/72/6D/37726D62AD7380472B7B4665F1721192.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3fd6c0308ef --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/72/6D/37726D62AD7380472B7B4665F1721192.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Braconidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Mark R. + + + +Author + +Godfray, H. Charles J. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8151 +8151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 +1314-2828-4-8151 + + + + +Pauesia (Pauesia) picta (Haliday, 1834) + + + + +Aphidius pictus +Haliday, 1834 + + + +Distribution +Wales + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/72/C2/3772C2594C265EC1A8680D37E227C121.xml b/data/37/72/C2/3772C2594C265EC1A8680D37E227C121.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4626306c359 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/72/C2/3772C2594C265EC1A8680D37E227C121.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +The genus Eriastichus La Salle (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae, Tetrastichinae) in the Neotropical region, introducing 48 new species + + + +Author + +Hansson, Christer +Scientific Associate Biological Museum (Entomology), Lund University, Soelvegatan 37, SE- 22362 Lund, Sweden & Natural History Museum, Life Sciences, Cromwell Road, London, UK +christer.hansson@biol.lu.se + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2021 + +2021-02-22 + + +1019 + + +35 +91 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1019.60364 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1019.60364 +1313-2970-1019-35 +EE1BAF875BD74E189DF929E2C9CC7DAC +8D799427736453288CA3E1DB9933AAC6 + + + + +Eriastichus diadrys +sp. nov. +Figure 22 + + + +Type locality. + +Costa Rica, San +Jose +, San Gerardo de Dota, +9°33'N +, +83°47'W +, 20-21.ii.2013, J.S. Noyes leg. + + + +Type specimen. + +Holotype +male dried and glued to a paper card. Original labels: "Costa Rica, San +Jose +, San Gerardo de Dota, 20-21.ii.2013, J.S. Noyes, NHM (Ent) 2012-91", "HOLOTYPE +Eriastichus diadrys +Hansson" [red printed label], (NHMUK014431029). + + + +Diagnosis + +(male). +Head black and antenna dark brown; ventral plaque on scape ca. 0.5 +x +as long as scape (Fig. +22 +), antenna with dorsobasal setae on F1 0.5 +x +as long as F1; gaster with lateral tufts of pale and flattened setae on Gt3-6. + + + +Description + +(male holotype NHMUK014431029). +Length of body 2.1 mm. Head black, antenna dark brown, ventral plaque black. Mesoscutum and mesoscutellum black with metallic tinges, dorsellum and propodeum black. Legs with hind coxa and hind femur dark brown, fore and mid coxae yellowish brown with base dark brown, trochanters, tibiae and tarsi yellowish brown. Gaster dark brown. + + + +Head +. + +Length/width in frontal view 0.7; width/length in dorsal view 2.2; POL/OOL 2.0; WM/MS 1.9; MS/HE 0.5; HE/head length in frontal view 0.6; widths head/mesoscutum 1.1. + +Antenna +. + +Pedicel + flagellum length/mesoscutum width 1.9; pedicel + flagellum length/head width 1.8; lengths scape/ventral plaque 2.1; ventral plaque located in the middle of scape; scape length/width 2.7; lengths scape/head (dorsal view) 0.5; scape length/HE 0.9; length/width F1, F2, F3, F4, clava: 2.7, 2.9, 2.7, 2.6, 5.7; length dorsobasal setae on F1/length F1 0.5. + +Mesosoma +. + +Length/width 1.6; mesoscutum length/width 0.7; mesoscutellum length/width 0.8; widths SMG/SLG 1.5; enclosed space between SMG length/width 2.0; lengths mesoscutum/mesoscutellum 1.6; lengths mesoscutellum/dorsellum 2.9; lengths mesosoma/gaster 0.8. + +Wings +. + +CC length/width 20.6; lengths CC/MV 1.0; lengths MV/ST 2.1; lengths MV/PM 4.8; lengths PM/ST 0.4; submarginal vein with eight setae on dorsal surface. + +Gaster +. + +With lateral tufts of pale and flattened setae on Gt3-6. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/72/DA/3772DA29D17F7CE28A10E07E584C7E4C.xml b/data/37/72/DA/3772DA29D17F7CE28A10E07E584C7E4C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..63cfa66e066 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/72/DA/3772DA29D17F7CE28A10E07E584C7E4C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,302 @@ + + + +The ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Strandzha Mountain and adjacent coastal territories (Bulgaria and Turkey) + + + +Author + +Kostova, Rumyana + + + +Author + +Gueorguiev, Borislav + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8135 +8135 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8135 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8135 +1314-2828-4-8135 + + + + +Pterostichus (Cryobius) properans (Chaudoir, 1868) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +R. Kostova +; individualCount: +1 +; Location: countryCode: TR; locality: + +Kiyikoey +surroundings + +; verbatimElevation: +38 +; verbatimCoordinates: +N41°39'25.7" +, +E28°05'11.2" +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventDate: +30/05/2009 + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +R. Kostova +; individualCount: +2 +; Location: countryCode: TR; locality: + +Igneada, Hamam +Goelue + +; verbatimElevation: +5 +; verbatimCoordinates: +N41°49'43.2" +, +E27°57'31.1" +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventDate: +02/10/2009 + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +R. Kostova +; individualCount: +2 +; Location: countryCode: TR; locality: +Sislioba Vill. surroundings +; verbatimElevation: +49 +; verbatimCoordinates: +N41°57'44.2" +, +E27°54'36.1" +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventDate: +02/10/2009 + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +R. Kostova +; individualCount: +1 +; Location: countryCode: TR; locality: + +Demirkoey +, +Doekuemhanesi + +; verbatimElevation: +179 +; verbatimCoordinates: +N41°49'09.6" +, +E27°48'43.2" +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventDate: +03/10/2009 + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +R. Kostova +; individualCount: +4 +; Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Bliznak Vill., PA"Bataka" +; verbatimElevation: +324 +; verbatimCoordinates: +N42°11'37.3" +, +E27°19'35.8" +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventDate: +03.08-07.09.2009 +; habitat: oak forest + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +R. Kostova +; individualCount: +1 +; Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Malko Tarnovo, "Propada" Place +; verbatimElevation: +401 +; verbatimCoordinates: +N41°58'49.6" +, +E27°29'25.7" +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventDate: +09.06-02.07.2009 +; habitat: oriental beech forest + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +R. Kostova +; individualCount: +4 +; Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Malko Tarnovo, "Propada" Place +; verbatimElevation: +401 +; verbatimCoordinates: +N41°58'49.6" +, +E27°29'25.7" +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventDate: +03.08-07.09.2009 +; habitat: oriental beech forest + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +R. Kostova +; individualCount: +2 +; Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Slivarovo Vill., "Shafariitsa" Place +; verbatimElevation: +224 +; verbatimCoordinates: +N41°57'37.8" +, +E27°39'34.8" +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventDate: +03.08-07.09.2009 +; habitat: black alder-oak forest + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +R. Kostova +; individualCount: +4 +; Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Bulgari Vill., PA "Marina reka" +; verbatimElevation: +183 +; verbatimCoordinates: +N42°06'41.7" +, +E27°45'53.0" +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventDate: +03.08-07.09.2009 +; habitat: oriental beech-oak forest with Rododendron ponticum + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +R. Kostova +; individualCount: +1 +; Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Brodilovo Vill., under Papiya peak +; verbatimElevation: +336 +; verbatimCoordinates: +N42°06'23.7" +, +E27°50'36.1" +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventDate: +03.08-07.09.2009 +; habitat: oak forest + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +R. Kostova +; individualCount: +1 +; Location: countryCode: TR; locality: +Gokyaka Vill., Road to Dupnisa Cave +; verbatimElevation: +337 +; verbatimCoordinates: +N41°52'20.0" +, +E27°37'06.4" +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventDate: +06.07 - 29.09.2009 +; habitat: oak-hornbeam mixed forest + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +A. Pfeffer +; individualCount: +1 +; Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Strandzha +; Event: eventDate: +VII.1934 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +NMP + + +Type status: +Other material +. Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Strandzha +; Record Level: bibliographicCitation: +Maran +(1944: 101, as Haptoderusacrogonusproperans) + + +Type status: +Other material +. Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Strandzha +; Record Level: bibliographicCitation: +Gueorguiev +& +Gueorguiev +(1995: 126) + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/73/1B/37731B4E1F52205011D9A4020973454E.xml b/data/37/73/1B/37731B4E1F52205011D9A4020973454E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f4c1f69f54d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/73/1B/37731B4E1F52205011D9A4020973454E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Braconidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Mark R. + + + +Author + +Godfray, H. Charles J. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8151 +8151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 +1314-2828--8151 + + + + +Chorebus poemyzae Griffiths, 1968 + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/73/87/37738795C708FFDB45F4FD0BFF48F8EF.xml b/data/37/73/87/37738795C708FFDB45F4FD0BFF48F8EF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2a1612eb994 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/73/87/37738795C708FFDB45F4FD0BFF48F8EF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ + + + +A new species of Dohrnemesa and a new species of Polauchenia from Brazil (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae) + + + +Author + +Gil-Santana, Hélcio R. + + + +Author + +Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-10-25 + + +4338 + + +2 + + +201 +240 + + + +journal article +31752 +10.11646/zootaxa.4338.2.1 +a41ab71e-5763-40bc-93fb-b3e61479a598 +1175-5326 +1036014 +6043549C-C784-4EAF-9BC6-E009027B4F47 + + + + + + +Genus + +PoLauchenia +McAtee & Malloch, 1925 + + + + + + + + + +Polauchenia + +McAtee & Malloch, 1925 +: 10 + + +, 12 (keys), 47 (original description); + +Wygodzinsky 1949 +: 33 + +(catalog); + +Wygodzinsky 1966 +: 221 + +(key), 294–296 (redescription); + +Putshkov & Putshkov 1985 +: 29 + +(catalog); Maldonado 1990: 91 (catalog); + +Froeschner 1999 +: 197 + +(catalog); + +Forero 2004 +: 149 + +(diagnosis), 184 (key). + + + + + +Type species: + +Polauchenia protentor +McAtee & Malloch, 1925 + +, by original designation. + + +The somewhat concise original description of + +Polauchenia +( +McAtee & Malloch 1925 +) + +was followed by a detailed redescription of this genus by +Wygodzinsky (1966) +. Among the New World +Emesini +, + +Polauchenia + +can be separated from the other genera through the following combination of characteristics: medium-sized species ( +11–20 mm +in length); pronotum pedunculate; scutellum and metanotum with a spine; posteroventral series of fore femora beginning at base of article, composed of large and small spiniferous processes bearing relatively slender apical spines; large processes of subequal size, the most basal either straight or slightly inclined toward apex of article; anteroventral series beginning somewhat apically to posteroventral series, not interrupted at base, composed of medium-sized and small, generally slender spines inserted on short bases; fore tarsi three-segmented; forewings with two cells, base of basal cell pointed, emitting a single longitudinal vein towards axillary region ( +McAtee & Malloch 1925 +, +Wygodzinsky 1966 +, +Forero 2004 +). + + +Among other characteristics of the genus, as also described by +Wygodzinsky (1966) +, the following are noteworthy: all species are conspicuously marked with light and dark colors; frequently with a pair of tubercles or short spines behind interocular furrow of head dorsally; petiole of pronotum ranging from slightly shorter to much longer than fore lobe of pronotum; humeri distinctly tuberculate or spined, frequently a spine also at center of hind border of pronotum. Both series of processes of the fore are often accompanied by strong elongated setae. Hind wings with R+M and Cu extending from level of cross vein to near wing border, forming bifurcation near base. Anal lobe with region between 2A and hind border conspicuously sclerotized. + + +There are currently five species included in + +Polauchenia + +, two of which, + +P. schubarti +Wygodzinsky, 1950 + +and + +P. unicornis +Maldonado, 1968 + +, are known from +Brazil +( +Wygodzinsky 1950 +, +1966 +; Maldonado 1968, 1990). It is noteworthy that, with the exception of + +P. schubarti + +which was described based on five specimens ( +Wygodzinsky 1950 +), the other species were described based on two specimens ( + +P. marcapata + +) or on a single specimen each ( + +P. biannulata +McAtee & Malloch, 1925 + +, + +P. protentor +McAtee & Malloch, 1925 + +, + +P. unicornis + +), and very few additional specimens of + +Polauchenia + +spp. have been recorded subsequently to their description ( +Wygodzinsky 1945 +, +1950 +, +1966 +; Maldonado 1968; +Forero 2006 +). On the other hand, no species of this genus have been recorded from caves so far. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/73/87/37738795C709FFE245F4FF6CFED2FB01.xml b/data/37/73/87/37738795C709FFE245F4FF6CFED2FB01.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7f2c16ab14a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/73/87/37738795C709FFE245F4FF6CFED2FB01.xml @@ -0,0 +1,739 @@ + + + +A new species of Dohrnemesa and a new species of Polauchenia from Brazil (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae) + + + +Author + +Gil-Santana, Hélcio R. + + + +Author + +Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-10-25 + + +4338 + + +2 + + +201 +240 + + + +journal article +31752 +10.11646/zootaxa.4338.2.1 +a41ab71e-5763-40bc-93fb-b3e61479a598 +1175-5326 +1036014 +6043549C-C784-4EAF-9BC6-E009027B4F47 + + + + + + + +PoLauchenia ParaProtentor + +sp. nov. + + + + +( +Figs. 88–117 +) + + + + +Diagnosis +. (male). Total length: 14.0 mm. Similar to + +P. protentor + +but differs from this species as well as other species of + +Polauchenia + +by the petiole of petiole being 1.5 times as long as fore lobe. + + + + +Description. Male. +Measurements (mm): total length: to tip of abdomen 13.5; to tip of forewings 14.0; head (excluding collum): length 1.4; length of anteocular portion 0.5; length of postocular portion 0.5; width across eyes 1.0; interocular distance between eyes 0.45; width of right eye 0.3; lengths of antennal segments: I: 6.9; II: 6.6; III: 0.9; IV: 1.7; lengths of labial segments: II [first visible]: 0.4; III: 0.5; IV: 0.8. Thorax: pronotum: length of fore lobe 1.0; length of the petiole 1.5; length of hind lobe 1.2; width at posterior margin 1.2; length of forewing 9.0; length of hind wing 6.6. Fore legs: length of coxa 2.0; length of femur 4.7; length of tibia 4.1; length of tarsus 0.4; middle legs: length of femur 9.4; length of tibia 12.6; length of tarsus 0.3; hind legs: length of femur 13.4; length of tibia 19.0; length of tarsus 0.35. Abdomen: length 7.0; maximum width 1.6. + + +Coloration +: brownish to light brown, with yellowish to pale yellow markings or portions ( +Figs. 88–90 +, +102 +). +Head +brownish; clypeus, labrum, midline posteriorly to tubercles of the postocular region, apices of segments II and III and base of segment IV of labium pale white to pale yellow; area just behind clypeus darkened ( +Figs. 89–90 +). Antenna brownish; basal and apical extremities of all segments pale; segment I with four pale narrow annuli along the segment; segment II with three pale annuli, two at basal half and one at distal half; mid portions of basal and distal half of segment IV somewhat paler, but without forming clear annuli. +Thorax: +dark brownish, anterior collar and prothoracic supracoxal lobes pale; petiole paler on dorsal surface ( +Figs. 89–90 +). Pronotum with a dorsal median longitudinal pale line; thinner on proximal half of fore lobe and on hind lobe and wider on distal half of fore lobe and on petiole ( +Fig. 90 +). On fore lobe a curved thin pale stripe running from lateral margin anteriorly and meeting the median longitudinal pale stripe at distal half of fore lobe. Hind lobe with a pair of pale submedian, subparallel longitudinal stripes that do not reach posterior margin, ending approximately at the level of humeral tubercles ( +Figs. 90 +, +102 +). Median portion of posterior margin of hind lobe somewhat paler ( +Figs. 90 +, +102 +). Lower margin of hind lobe of pronotum pale at approximately its anterior two-thirds. Humeral tubercles pale on central portion, dorsally ( +Figs. 90 +, +102 +). Spines of scutellum and metanotum brownish ( +Fig. 89 +). Disc of scutellum, below its spine, pale. Legs: fore coxa light brownish with basal and apical extremities pale and two pale annuli, somewhat wider at submedian basal portion and narrower at approximately midportion of distal half of the segment ( +Fig. 88 +). Fore trochanter with approximately basal half pale and distal half brownish. Mid and hind coxa and trochanters brownish, the basal extremities of the latter somewhat paler. General coloration of femora brownish. Fore femora with basal extremity, four annuli and apex pale ( +Fig. 88 +). Mid ( +Fig. 88 +) and hind femora with five annuli and the apex pale; the most basal pale annulus inconspicuous. These pale markings on femora become progressively larger from fore femora towards hind femora ( +Fig. 88 +). Fore tibia brownish with base, and submedian basal annulus pale; between these, two pale lateral spots, which together form an incomplete pale subbasal annulus. Mid ( +Fig. 88 +) and hind tibiae pale with three brownish annuli at basal half, the most distal of which, fainter; apex brownish. Tarsi brownish; base of segment II of fore tarsi pale. Forewing brownish with basal extremity and most veins, pale or whitish; some oblique small pale stripes on basal half, between veins; diffuse texture formed by small irregular whitish spots or lines inside discal cell and on distal portion of the forewing; thin, longitudinal, submedian, oblique, somewhat irregular line along discal cell, except at its basal portion, and two larger oblique whitish stripes near tip of wing, which because of their continuation with veins enclosing apex of discal cell, a whitish figure somewhat similar to an “X” at the distal third is formed ( +Fig. 102 +). Hind wings hyaline, somewhat more pigmented on distal third above R+M vein, on areas adjoining distal veins and on anal lobe ( +Figs. 104–105 +). Abdomen light brownish; connexivum with small basolateral whitish spots; sternites with thin, interrupted and illdefined whitish lines and scattered pale irregular spots; apical portion of the short prolongation of last tergite paler. + + +Vestiture +: head, first antennal segment, thorax, coxae, trochanters, femora and tibiae covered with very numerous and long thin setae, and with a short and very dense pubescence formed by thin, curved setae. The setae are pale, yellowish to golden-yellowish to pale-brownish and in general they are paler or darker, similar to the coloration of the integument in which they are inserted. In some exceptions mentioned below, groupings of whitish adpressed setae form whitish markings on areas with brownish integument. +Head +: mostly covered by a pubescence formed by adpressed short thin setae, which are formed by somewhat longer setae on postocular region and gula. The setae covering the pair of short postocular tubercles are whitish, contrasting with their integument, which is brownish; on midline of posterior half of postocular region, the setae are somewhat more numerous and paler. Glabrous areas on head: transverse sulcus, a declivous area immediately anterior to it and a pair of submedian slightly divergent very thin stripes running from midportion of transverse sulcus to a point somewhat at midpoint between transverse sulcus and medial margin of antenniferous tubercles. Antenna: segment I covered with short adpressed curved thin setae and long thin scattered somewhat curved setae ( +Figs. 92–94 +); basal portion of antennal segment II with setae of intermediate length between the adpressed setae of the pubescence and the longer setae that are present on segment I ( +Fig. 94 +); segments II–IV covered with short, adpressed, straight or somewhat curved, thin setae ( +Figs. 95–98 +); a few (five) very much thinner isolated elements (interpreted as trichobothria) on segment II, four of them in its basal portion and one in its middle third. Labium: segment II (first visible) with scattered moderately short adpressed setae; segment III and IV almost glabrous with scattered straight erect and some adpressed short setae, somewhat more numerous on dorsal region. +Thorax +: besides the short dense pubescence and long thin setae, there are several even longer setae on distal half of pronotum, meso and metasternum ( +Figs. 89–90 +). A glabrous shining curved stripe running just below the curved pale stripe on fore lobe, but beginning somewhat far from lateral margin. Meso and metapleura with a midlateral somewhat large stripe formed by whitish pubescence, which does not reach anterior margin of either of them. Mesosternum with a midlongitudinal somewhat large stripe formed by whitish pubescence, which reaches the basal portion of metasternum. Laterally, on distal half of mesosternum and between coxa on metasternum, somewhat large stripes formed by whitish pubescence. Spines of scutellum and metanotum with numerous moderately short, thin setae. Forewing with a few scattered short thin setae at basal portion and a few scattered somewhat longer ones along costal vein. Hind wings glabrous. Legs generally covered by dense short adpressed pubescence and several long thin setae. Mid and hind coxae with a pair of glabrous linear areas, which do not reach apex ventrally; hind coxae with an additional and somewhat larger glabrous area laterally. Fore femur: posteroventral series beginning at the base of the article and ending far from apex ( +Fig. 99 +), composed of about thirteen large and medium-sized spiniferous processes, the most basal of which with its apex slightly inclined toward apex of article ( +Fig. 99 +); among these large processes, approximately eighty small spiniferous processes; towards apical portion of fore femur, the large and then the small processes become somewhat smaller and absent at approximately distal fifth. Lengths of larger processes combined with apical spines about or somewhat more than four-fifths of diameter of segment. Anteroventral series beginning somewhat apically of posteroventral series ( +Fig. 99 +), not interrupted at base, composed of nine spiniferous tubercles, on which around sixty sharp small spines are present. A sparse series of very long and strong setae accompanies the posteroventral series ( +Fig. 99 +); these setae reach the apex of the femur, where they are somewhat shorter. Fore tibiae with numerous stiff setae on subapical dorsal depression ( +Fig. 100 +); ventral surface with numerous small spines, among which, with exception of the basal fifth of the article, about twenty larger spiniferous processes, subequal in size, most of which with lighter base and darkened spiny distal portion; at both sides of ventral surface, beside these processes, series of long and strong setae ( +Fig. 100 +); on apical extremity, a cluster of stiff somewhat curved golden setae ventrally ( +Fig. 101 +). Tarsi covered with moderately long setae ( +Fig. 101 +). +Abdomen +: covered with dense adpressed pubescence and more scattered thin long setae, which are more curved too. + + + +FIGURES 88–90 +. + +Polauchenia paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype, 88–89, lateral view, 88, scale bar 3.0 mm, 89, head and thorax, scale bar 1.5 mm, 90, head and pronotum, scale bar 1.0 mm. + + + + +FIGURES 91–98 +. + +Polauchenia paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype, lateral view, 91, head and fore lobe of pronotum, 92–98, antennal portions, scale bar 0.3 mm, 92–93, segment I, 92, basal portion, 94, apical and basal portions of segments I and II, respectively, 95, segment II, 96, segment III and base of segment IV, 97, apex of segment III and basal portion of segment IV, 98, segment IV, apical portion. + + + +Structure +. +Integument +moderately shiny. +Head +elongated; anteocular portion as long as postocular ( +Figs. 89– 91 +). Transversal (interocular) sulcus deep, situated somewhat posteriorly to middle of eyes; just anterior to it, on midline, a very small oval fossa ( +Figs. 89– 91 +). Eyes globose, reaching dorsal outline of head at interocular sulcus and reaching but not surpassing ventral outline of head ventrally; a pair of very short tubercles just behind interocular sulcus ( +Figs. 89– 91 +). Dorsal interocular distance about 1.5 times the width of each eye. Antenna inserted somewhat closer to apex of head than to the eyes ( +Fig. 91 +); antennal segments progressively thinner, very slender; segments I–III straight; segment IV somewhat curved, with apex triangular ( +Figs. 92– 98 +). First two visible labial segments thicker than the distal segment; apex of segment III approximately at level of midportion of eye; segment IV ending at level of anterior portion of stridulitrum ( +Fig. 91 +). +Thorax +: pronotum pedunculate; petiole 1.5 times as long as fore lobe, the latter semioval; anterior projections of collar rounded; hind lobe bell-shaped in dorsal view, hind border emarginated at median portion; humeral angle with an elevated rounded tubercle ( +Figs. 88– 90 +). Lateral margins of stridulitrum conspicuous. Spine of scutellum somewhat elongated, obliquely directed backwards; spine of metanotum somewhat larger than the spine of scutellum, apex obtuse, obliquely directed upwards ( +Fig. 89 +). Fore legs slender; fore coxae elongated ( +Fig. 88 +), twice as long as fore lobe of pronotum and approximately 1.3 times longer than petiole; fore tibiae slightly shorter than fore femora, somewhat curved ( +Fig. 88 +); slightly depressed in dorsal portion subapically ( +Fig. 100 +); thickened at apex, where the inner surface is somewhat flattened and has a very small subdistal pecten ( +Fig. 101 +). Mid and hind legs very long and slender, with tibiae somewhat thinner and longer than femora and slightly curved. Tarsi short, three-segmented, slender ( +Fig. 101 +). Forewings slender, surpassing apex of abdomen by approximately +0.5 mm +; basal cell triangular, with a single directed vein emitted from its base and with Pcu meeting it at level of its apical portion; pterostigma ending somewhat far of apex of the wing ( +Fig. 102 +). Hind wings reaching the last tergite at level of its basal third; venation as in +Fig. 103 +; R+M not bifurcate ( +Figs. 103–104 +); anal lobe with region between 2A and hind border not sclerotized, just somewhat pigmented ( +Fig. 105 +). +Abdomen: +slender, slightly enlarged toward posterior half. Last tergite strongly narrowed towards apex, with a short tongue-shaped prolongation posteriorly, approaching tip of pygophore ( +Fig. 106–107 +). Eight sternite covering approximately half of the pygophore, ventrally ( +Fig. 106 +). +Male genitalia +: pygophore subrectangular in dorsal and ventral views ( +Fig. 109 +); anterior dorsal sclerotization narrow; basal margin curved backwards on midportion ventrally ( +Fig. 109 +); posterior process somewhat large, apex truncate ( +Fig. 108 +). Parameres symmetrical, curved and with moderately long, thin and non-numerous setae in distal half; apex rounded ( +Fig. 110 +). Phallus symmetrical ( +Figs. 111–112 +). Articulatory apparatus ( +art app +) with basal plates fused at insertion of phallobase and at middle ( +Figs. 113–114 +); basal arms ( +ba +) very short ( +Figs. 111 +, +113–114 +). Struts ( +str +) long, elongated, and almost entirely fused, divided only at extreme base; apical margin rounded ( +Figs. 111–112, 115–116 +). Phallosoma largely membranous; its dorsal wall weakly sclerotized apically ( +asd +) ( +Figs. 111–112, 115–116 +), a pair of ventral moderately short sclerotizations ( +vsc +) also present (Figs. 111,114). Endosoma wall smooth, forming three irregular lobes apically ( +ale +) ( +Figs. 111–112 +). Between the struts and ventral wall, a large median process of endosoma ( +mpe +) ( +Fig. 111 +), which in dorsal view is U-shaped, with strongly sclerotized and regular borders; in its interior, a pair of irregular sclerotizations, which seem connected to the very sclerotized base and towards apex with the apical lobes of endosoma wall ( +Fig. 117 +). + + + + +Distribution. +Brazil +, state of +Pará +. + + + + +Etymology +. The name of the new species was given in reference to its general similarity to + +P. protentor + +. Noun in apposition, ending not to be changed. + + +Specimen examined. +MALE +HOLOTYPE +: + +BRAZIL +, +Pará + +, Parauapebas, Cave GEM, 1722, ( +06º08'05"S +50º08'04"W +), +11.iv.2011 +, R.L. Ferreira leg. (MNRJ). + + + + +Habitat and natural history. +The single specimen of + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +was found in a small cave of horizontal extent +14.5 m +that is associated with the “canga” formation (ferruginous superficial breccia). It is located in a forested area (mainly composed by metallophilic savanna). The cave comprises a shelter with low environmental stability and no aphotic areas. The cave is generally dry and has no active drip points during the dry season, although it becomes quite drenched in the wet season, with several drip points and percolation areas. The single specimen was found in the cave ceiling, near the entrance. This was probably an accidental finding, since no other specimens were found in any of the almost 100 caves that were inventoried in the area (these were sampled twice, in both dry and the rainy season). Accordingly, this species is probably distributed in the forest, and specimens may possibly enter caves, accidentally or maybe while searching for prey near the entrances. + + + + +Comments +. Most of the features of + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +are in accordance with the definition of + +Polauchenia + +( +McAtee & Malloch 1925 +, +Wygodzinsky 1966 +), therefore the placement of + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +in this genus is justified. + + +Nevertheless, at least three characteristics of + +Polauchenia + +as described by +Wygodzinsky (1966) +were not recorded in + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +Firstly, while that author mentioned that both series of processes of fore femora are often accompanied by strong elongated setae, in the new species these setae were only shown to be present beside to posteroventral series ( +Fig. 99 +). However, judging by Wygodzinsky’s (1966: fig. +90I +) illustration of the base of the fore femur of the male of + +P. protentor + +, this species only presents elongated strong setae accompanying the posteroventral setae. Therefore, it can be assumed that the presence of elongated strong setae near the processes of the anteroventral series is a variable characteristic among the species of + +Polauchenia + +. + + +Secondly, the bifurcation of R+M near the wing border of the hind wing is absent in the new species described here ( +Figs. 103–104 +). Thirdly, the region between 2A and the hind border of the anal lobe in the hind wing is not sclerotized ( +Fig. 105 +), although it has been recorded as conspicuously sclerotized in + +Polauchenia +( +Wygodzinsky 1966 +) + +. + + +Nevertheless, it seems that before to the present study, among the species of + +Polauchenia + +, the hind wing had only been examined in + +P. protentor + +. With the exception of Wygodzinsky’s (1966: fig. 90D) illustration of a portion of the wing of this species, there is no other description or figure of the hind wing in any other species of this genus ( +McAtee & Malloch 1925 +, +Wygodzinsky 1950 +, +1966 +; Maldonado 1968). Thus, it is necessary to examine the hind wing in other species of + +Polauchenia + +to record these characteristics among them, in order to ascertain whether they are of generic or specific significance. + + +Most of the features of the male genitalia of + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +are also very similar to those of the other species of + +Polauchenia + +, as summarized by +Wygodzinsky (1966) +, with the exception of the large process of endosoma described here in the new species ( +Figs. 111 +, +117 +). +Wygodzinsky (1966) +did not describe any process of endosoma in + +Polauchenia + +spp. He only mentioned that the endosoma was of somewhat complex structure and that it had not been examined in a fully evaginated state. It is possible that any process in the endosoma in the specimens that he examined had remained unnoticed or unrecorded by him. Therefore, only future examination of additional specimens will allow better conclusions or comparisons regarding the processes of endosoma among species of + +Polauchenia + +. + + + +FIGURES 99–105 +. + +Polauchenia paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype, 99, fore femur, basal portion, 100–101, scale bar 0.3 mm, lateral view, 100, fore tibia, subapical third, 101, apex of fore tibia and fore tarsus, 102, hind lobe of pronotum and forewings, dorsal view, scale bar 1.5 mm, 103–105, right hind wing, 103, venation, 104–105, scale bar 0.5 mm, 104, subapical portion, 105, subbasal portion, +al +, anal lobe. + + + + +FIGURES 106–111 +. + +Polauchenia paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype, 106–107, scale bar 0.5 mm, 106, apex of abdomen, hemelytra and genitalia, lateral view, 107, apex of abdomen, dorsal view, 108, pygophore and parameres, posterior view, scale bar 0.2 mm, 109, pygophore without parameres, ventral view, scale bar 0.3 mm, 110, paramere, scale bar, 0.2 mm, 111, phallus, lateral view, +ale +, apical lobes of endosoma wall, +art app +, articulatory apparatus, +asd +, apical sclerotization of dorsal wall of phallosoma, +ba +, basal arm, +mpe +, median process of endosoma, +str +, struts, +vsc +, ventral sclerotizations on phallosoma, scale bar 0.3 mm. + + + + +FIGURES 112–117 +. + +Polauchenia paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +, male genitalia, 112–114, scale bar 0.2 mm, 112, phallus, dorsal view, +ale +, apical lobes of endosoma wall, +art app +, articulatory apparatus, +asd +, apical sclerotization of dorsal wall of phallosoma, +str +, struts, 113, articulatory apparatus, ventral view, 114–117, dorsal view, 114, articulatory apparatus and ventral sclerotizations on phallosoma ( +vsc +), +ba +, basal arm, 115, struts and apical sclerotization of dorsal wall of phallosoma, 116, apical portion of struts and apical sclerotization of dorsal wall of phallosoma, 117, median process of endosome. + + + +Among the other species of + +Polauchenia +, + +the species that most closely resembles + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +seems to be + +P. protentor + +. + + +The latter species was described based on a female from + +Panama + +( +McAtee & Malloch 1925 +). +Wygodzinsky (1966) +examined a male identified by these authors, also from + +Panama + +, and provided some illustrations of it. +Forero (2006) +recorded the species from +Colombia +. + + +Several differences were recorded between + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +and + +P. protentor + +, as follows. + + +Firstly, while the postocular tubercles of the head and humeri are clearly spined in + +P. protentor + +(McAtte & +Malloch 1925 +: fig. 63, +Wygodzinsky 1966 +: fig. 90C), in + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +both of them are rounded, not spined ( +Figs. 90–91 +, +102 +). + + +Secondly, the petiole of the pronotum is at least twice as long as the fore lobe of the pronotum in + +P. protentor + +and respectively only 1.5 times longer in the new species. + + +Thirdly, the spine of the scutellum is directed upwards in + +P. protentor + +( +McAtee & Malloch 1925 +: fig. 63, +Wygodzinsky 1966 +: fig. 90C) and obliquely directed backwards in + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +( +Fig. 89 +). + + +Fourthly, there are the two differences in the hind wing already commented on above, i. e. the bifurcation of R+M near the wing border and the sclerotized region between 2A and the hind border of the anal lobe present in + +P. protentor +( +Wygodzinsky 1966 +) + +, which were absent in the new species. + + +Fifthly, in the male genitalia, while the apical portion of the struts in + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +is rounded and entire ( +Figs. 112, 115–116 +), it is clearly largely bifurcated in + +P. protentor + +( +Wygodzinsky 1966: fig. 90R +). + + +The first three characteristics were confirmed from photos on specimens of + +P. protentor + +from +Colombia +provided by Dr D. Forero. The specimens formed the basis of his record of this species from the country ( +Forero 2006 +). + + +Regarding coloration, the main differences between + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +and + +P. protentor + +are the following: 1—antennal segment II with three pale annuli in + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +and four in + +P. protentor + +; 2— spine of scutellum and metanotum brownish in + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +( +Fig. 89 +) and pale in + +P. protentor + +; 3—fore coxae with a single median pale annulus in + +P. protentor + +and two pale annuli in + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +; 4—mid and hind femora and tibiae with one more and two fewer annuli, respectively, in + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + +in comparison with + +P. protentor + +; 5—apex of forewing more extensively marked with white in + +P. protentor + +. + + +With the new species described here, six species are now included in + +Polauchenia + +, three of them recorded only from +Brazil +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/73/87/37738795C715FFC545F4F868FE39FE29.xml b/data/37/73/87/37738795C715FFC545F4F868FE39FE29.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8fb74305625 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/73/87/37738795C715FFC545F4F868FE39FE29.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +A new species of Dohrnemesa and a new species of Polauchenia from Brazil (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae) + + + +Author + +Gil-Santana, Hélcio R. + + + +Author + +Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-10-25 + + +4338 + + +2 + + +201 +240 + + + +journal article +31752 +10.11646/zootaxa.4338.2.1 +a41ab71e-5763-40bc-93fb-b3e61479a598 +1175-5326 +1036014 +6043549C-C784-4EAF-9BC6-E009027B4F47 + + + + + + +Tribe +Emesini + + + + +When describing +Dohrnemesa +, +Wygodzinsky (1945) +considered this genus to be close to + +Polauchenia + +, pointing out that the main differences between them were the absence of tubercles or spined humeri and the presence of a free short vein emitted from the base of the basal cell of the forewing in +Dohrnemesa +. Presence/absence of a short free vein at the base of the basal cell of the forewing, in +Dohrnemesa +and + +Polauchenia + +respectively, is the main character that separates these genera in the key to genera of the +Emesini +presented by +Wygodzinsky (1966) +. Additionally, on the basis of this characteristic alone, this author transferred + +Polauchenia reimoseri +Wygodzinsky, 1945 + +to +Dohrnemesa +, making the assumption that possession of two veins emitted from the base of the basal cell indicated that this species belonged to the latter genus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/73/87/37738795C716FFDC45F4F9DFFC48FAF4.xml b/data/37/73/87/37738795C716FFDC45F4F9DFFC48FAF4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ca121c880af --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/73/87/37738795C716FFDC45F4F9DFFC48FAF4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,2208 @@ + + + +A new species of Dohrnemesa and a new species of Polauchenia from Brazil (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae) + + + +Author + +Gil-Santana, Hélcio R. + + + +Author + +Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-10-25 + + +4338 + + +2 + + +201 +240 + + + +journal article +31752 +10.11646/zootaxa.4338.2.1 +a41ab71e-5763-40bc-93fb-b3e61479a598 +1175-5326 +1036014 +6043549C-C784-4EAF-9BC6-E009027B4F47 + + + + + + + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + +sp. nov. + + + + +( +Figs. 1–79 +, +82–83 +) + + + + +Diagnosis +. Somewhat larger: while length of other +Dohrnemesa +species ranges from +10 to 16 mm +, the total length of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +is 18.5–18.8 mm (males) to 21.1–23.0 mm (females). The males most closely resemble the male of + +D. lanei + +. The two species can be readily separated by the following characteristics: 1— postocular portion of head with a median distinct tubercle ( + +D. lanei + +) or an oval small shallow tumescence ( + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +); 2—Pcu meeting discal cell somewhat distad ( + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +, +Figs. 27–29 +, +31 +) or proximad ( + +D. lanei + +) of the apex of basal cell on forewing; 3—sternites with several whitish markings in + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +( +Fig. 36 +) and uniformly blackish in + +D. lanei + +. The females of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +differ from all known females of +Dohrnemesa +by their forewings greatly reduced, reaching about middle of abdomen ( +Figs. 49–51 +, 64, 74), extremely reduced hind wings (Fig. 66), and abdominal segments IV–VI greatly widened ( +Figs. 73–76 +). + + + + +Description. Male. +Figures 1–48 +. Measurements: +Table 1 +. + + + +TABLE 1 +. Measurements (mm) of male specimens (N=3) of + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
MeanSDHolotypeParatypes (N=2)
Total length18.670.1518.518.7–18.8
Head length (excluding neck)1.670.051.61.7
Anteocular portion length0.50.00.50.5
Postocular portion length0.60.00.60.6
Head width across eyes1.10.01.11.1
Interocular distance0.530.050.60.5
Transverse width of eye0.30.00.30.3
Antennal segment I length10.50.3610.910.2–10.4
Antennal segment II length10.970.2311.110.7–11.1
Ant. segment III length0.870.050.80.9
Ant. segment IV length2.370.052.42.3–2.4
Labial segment II length0.430.050.40.4–0.5
Labial segment III length0.60.00.60.6
Labial segment IV length1.00.01.01.0
Fore lobe of pronotum length1.530.051.51.5–1.6
Petiole length2.330.112.42.2–2.4
Hind lobe of pronotum length1.930.051.91.9–2.0
Hind lobe of pronotum max. width1.60.01.61.6
Forewing length11.60.111.711.5–11.6
Hindwing length9.60.19.79.5–9.6
Fore coxa length3.230.153.13.2–3.4
Fore femur length7.030.117.16.9–7.1
Fore tibia length6.030.056.06.0–6.1
Fore tarsus length0.50.00.50.5
Mid femur length13.60.213.813.4–13.6
Mid tibia length20.760.8921.820.2–20.3
Mid tarsus length0.50.00.50.5
Hind femur length18.230.2518.218.0–18.5
Hind tibia length27.01.3227.525.5–28.0
Hind tarsus length0.60.00.60.6
Abdomen length9.560.119.59.5–9.7
Abdomen maximum width1.30.11.41.2–1.3
+ + +Coloration +: black to brownish black, with pale, yellowish or whitish markings or portions ( +Figs. 1 +, +4 +). +Head +black to brownish black; dorsally somewhat pale at midline on anterior half of anteocular region, but blackish on area just behind clypeus; on postocular region, a midlongitudinal thin reddish stripe; clypeus, labrum, apices of antenniferous tubercles, apices of labial segments II and III and base of segment IV pale to pale white; laterally, pale yellowish spots: a somewhat rounded spot adjacent to upper third of eye, anteriorly, and a pair of somewhat more elongated spots going from posterior rim of eye, at its upper half, to approximately midportion of postocular region ( +Figs. 2 +, +5 +). Antenna brownish to black-brownish with all intersegmental joints paler and narrow pale annuli, as follows: segment I with five annuli and apical extremity pale, the first (subbasal) annulus always longer, approximately five times longer than the width of the segment, the next three annuli about twice to four times as long as the width of the segment; and the fifth (subapical) annulus sometimes shorter, only somewhat longer than the width of the segment ( +Fig. 6 +). Segment II with three annuli, two at basal half and one somewhat distal to midpoint, the first about three to four times, second five to seven times and third three to seven times longer than the width of the segment (the variation in length of these annuli was even observed between the two antenna of the same specimen) ( +Fig. 7A–B +); apical extremity pale ( +Fig. 8 +). Segment III with apical extremity pale ( +Fig. 8 +). Segment IV mostly dark to pale yellowish with the subbasal and subapical portions dark brownish; basal extremity sometimes even paler ( +Fig. 8 +). +Thorax: +dark brownish to brownish black ( +Figs. 1–2 +, +4–5 +). Anterior collar at midportion, margin of prothoracic supracoxal lobe and small area above it pale. Pronotum with a dorsal median longitudinal pale line; thinner on fore lobe, wider on anterior fifth and posterior half of petiole and much thinner on hind lobe, not reaching the posterior margin of the latter ( +Figs. 1–2 +). Additionally, on first half, this pale line has a reddish tinge and is somewhat enlarged towards posterior fifth of petiole ( +Fig. 2 +). Hind lobe with a pair of pale submedian, subparallel longitudinal stripes that do not reach posterior margin, ending approximately at the level of anterior half of humeral tubercles; laterally they are accompanied by another pair of thinner shorter pale stripes, which end before the level of the humeral tubercles ( +Figs. 1–2 +). On fore lobe, a curved thin pale stripe running from lateral margin anteriorly and ending near, but not meeting the midlongitudinal pale stripe dorsally; below this stripe another shorter stripe that does not reach the level of the anterior and posterior extremities of the other stripe ( +Figs. 1–2 +, +5 +). At basal third of petiole, laterally, linear ill-defined pale markings. Posterior margin of hind lobe pale ( +Figs. 1–2 +). Lower margin of hind lobe of pronotum pale, forming a curved stripe, somewhat larger at basal half, ending at level of humeral tubercles. Humeral tubercles somewhat pale on central portion, dorsally ( +Figs. 1– 2 +). Spine of scutellum dark with apex pale; spine of metanotum pale at approximately distal half ( +Figs. 4 +, +19–20 +). Meso and hind supracoxal lobes with margins pale. Mesopleura with two and metapleura with one whitish spots on posterior portion. Legs: black to brownish black, with the following yellowish pale to whitish markings or portions: fore coxa with a large submedian proximal annulus and a pair of subapical small pale spots on inner and outer surfaces; apical margin pale ( +Fig. 21 +). Mid and hind coxae with a pair of pale spots on upper surface and apical extremities pale too. Fore trochanter with a pale spot on middle third laterally. Mid and hind trochanters pale on approximately basal third. Fore femora variably paler on dorsal surface, with a pair of pale spots on inner and outer surfaces of basal half, and an apical larger whitish spot, which almost covers all the segment but is absent on ventral surface and therefore does not form a complete ring ( +Fig. 21 +); anteroventral series with some and posteroventral series with most of the large and medium-sized processes with their basal portions and the area surrounding their insertion pale to whitish. Mid and hind femora with basal extremity pale; a subbasal narrow pale spot that does not form a complete ring; five large pale annuli along the segment, the more proximal of them generally narrower than the others, while all are generally narrower than the subsequent dark area; apices whitish for a distance somewhat longer than the preceding pale annulus ( +Fig. 24 +). Basal extremity of tibiae generally with reddish tinge, dorsally. Fore tibia with a pair of pale whitish spots on inner and outer surfaces subbasally, followed by two whitish annuli on basal half and a pair of very small pale yellowish spots on inner and outer surface, somewhat distal from midpoint ( +Fig. 21 +). Mid and hind tibiae mostly pale with three large darkened annuli on approximately basal half; apical extremities darkened too ( +Figs. 25–26 +). Additionally, mid tibiae with a small subbasal dorsal darkened spot. Tarsi darkened. Forewing mostly black to brownish black with basal third of area over costal vein largely pale to whitish; most veins and area surrounding them are, to a variable extent, pale or whitish; inner margin, from the level of Pcu to a point somewhat distally to the level of the apical inner angle of the discal cell, whitish. Discal cell with the following pale markings: diffuse texture formed by small irregular pale whitish spots and short lines; a transverse somewhat curved stripe crossing the cell at middle third and an additional interrupted or rippled transverse stripe at its distal third in the +paratypes +; a tortuous thin longitudinal approximately median line that runs along the cell to a variable extent. Two larger oblique whitish stripes near tip of forewing, which because of their continuation with veins enclosing apex of discal cell, a whitish figure somewhat similar to an “X” at the distal third is formed; below this “X”, a similar diffuse texture as described above and a longitudinal submedian whitish line, that runs from this “X” to the apical margin ( +Figs. 1 +, +27–28 +). Hind wings hyaline, somewhat more pigmented on distal third above R+M vein, on areas adjoining distal veins and on anal lobe ( +Figs. 33– 34 +). +Abdomen +brownish to black brownish ( +Figs. 35–36 +); tergites IV–VI with an inconspicuous scattered irregular pattern of pale and grayish markings; tergite VII with posterior margin pale yellowish; connexivum with basal, submedian and apical whitish spots on segments III–VI, the basal spots moderately larger; on segment VII a subbasal whitish spot ( +Fig. 35 +); spiracles and the area surrounding them whitish; sternites with the following whitish markings: a pair of sublateral thin stripes on the distal portion of sternite III; distal half of sternite IV with a sublateral pair of small spots at midportion and a pair of submedian tortuous stripes at distal third; sternites V–VI with submedian tortuous stripes, one pair of which on approximately basal third and two pairs of them on distal third of the segments; a pair of lateral distal spots on sternite VII; a pair of pale rounded apicolateral spots on sternite VIII ( +Fig. 36 +). +External male genitalia +: pygophore blackish and pale on exposed and hidden portions, respectively; parameres pale, with their apices somewhat darkened. + + +Vestiture +: body covered with a very dense pubescence formed by thin, short, adpressed setae and variably with scattered longer setae; generally, they are paler or darker, similar to the coloration of the integument in which they are inserted. In some exceptions mentioned below, groupings of whitish adpressed setae form whitish markings on areas with brownish integument. +Head +: mostly covered by a pubescence formed by adpressed short thin setae, with scattered longer setae on dorsal region and gula. Glabrous areas on head: transverse sulcus, a declivous area immediately anterior to it and a pair of submedian slightly divergent thin stripes running from midportion of transverse sulcus to a point near medial margin of antenniferous tubercles. Antenna: segments I–II densely covered with pubescence formed by short thin curved setae ( +Figs. 9–14 +); segment I with a few longer thin scattered somewhat curved setae on outer surface ( +Figs. 10–11 +); a few (eleven to fifteen) very much thinner longer isolated elements (interpreted as trichobothria) on segment II, seven to ten of them in its basal portion, implanted before the subbasal proximal pale annulus; others in more distally positions; segments III–IV covered with a pubescence formed by somewhat less numerous, short, straight, obliquely inclined or somewhat curved, thin setae ( +Figs. 15–18 +). Labium: segment II (first visible) with scattered moderately short adpressed setae; segment III and IV almost glabrous with scattered straight erect and some adpressed short setae, somewhat more numerous on dorsal region. +Thorax +: besides the short dense pubescence and long thin setae, there are several even longer, somewhat thicker, erect setae on pronotum, meso and metasternum ( +Figs. 2 +, +5 +). A glabrous shining curved stripe running between the curved pale stripes of fore lobe of pronotum ( +Fig. 5 +). Meso and metapleura with a lateral somewhat large stripe formed by whitish pubescence. Spines of scutellum and metanotum with numerous moderately short, thin setae. Forewing with a few scattered short thin setae at basal portion and a few scattered somewhat longer ones along costal vein. Hind wing glabrous. Legs generally covered by dense short adpressed pubescence and several long thin setae; the setae generally dark, somewhat paler at apices of mid and hind femora. Mid and hind coxae with three glabrous linear areas on basal two-thirds ventrally, and a small basolateral glabrous area too. Fore femur: posteroventral series beginning at the base of the article, composed of about twelve to fifteen large and medium-sized spiniferous processes, the most basal of which with its apex inclined toward apex of article; among these large processes, approximately seventy to seventy-eight small spiniferous processes; towards apical portion of fore femur, the large and then the small processes become somewhat smaller and absent at approximately distal fourth. Length of larger processes combined with apical spines about three-fourths of diameter of segment. A sparse series of very long and strong setae accompanies the posteroventral series; these setae reach the apex of the femur, where they are somewhat shorter. Anteroventral series beginning somewhat apically to posteroventral series, not interrupted at base, composed of fifteen to twenty-two spiniferous tubercles; among these large processes, approximately 103 to 105 sharp small spines, with an additional nine to ten small spines at the apex of the series. A sparse series of short, thin setae accompanies the anteroventral series; these setae reach the apex of the femora; the setae are even somewhat shorter at basal portion. Fore tibiae with numerous stiff setae on subapical dorsal depression ( +Fig. 22 +); ventral surface with numerous small spines, among which, with exception of the basal fifth of the article, about 29 to 31nine larger spiniferous processes, subequal in size, most of which with lighter base and darkened spiny distal portion; at both sides of ventral surface, beside these processes, series of long and strong setae ( +Fig. 22 +); on apical extremity, a cluster of stiff somewhat curved golden setae, ventrally ( +Fig. 23 +). Tarsi covered with moderately long setae ( +Fig. 23 +). +Abdomen +: covered with dense adpressed pubescence and scattered thin long setae, which become more numerous on last two or three segments and genital segments. + + + +FIGURES 1–3 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, male holotype, dorsal view, 1, scale bar 5.0 mm, 2, head and pronotum, scale bar 1.0 mm, 3, head. + + + + +FIGURES 4–8 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, male, lateral view, 4, holotype, scale bar 5.0 mm, 5, head, fore lobe and petiole of pronotum, scale bar 2.0 mm, 6–8, antennal segments coloration pattern, 6–7, scale bar 2.0 mm, 6, segment I, 7, segment II, except distal portion, A–B, different recorded patterns, 8, apex of segment II, segments III and IV, scale bar 1.0 mm. + + + + +FIGURES 9–18 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, male, antennal portions, lateral view, scale bar 0.3 mm, 9–10, segment I, 9, basal portion, 10, portion of basal third, 11, apical and basal portions of segments I and II, respectively, 12–13, segment II, 12, basal portion, 14, apex of segment II and basal portion of segment III, 15, segment III and apex and base of segments II and IV, respectively,16, apex of segment III and basal third of segment IV, 17–18, segment IV, 17, basal third, 18, apical third. + + + + +FIGURES 19–23 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, male, lateral view, 19, scutellum spine and apex of spine of metanotum, 20, scutellum and metanotum (wings moved down), 21, holotype, head and right fore leg, scale bar 2.0 mm, 22–23, scale bar 0.3 mm, 22, fore tibia, subapical third, 23, apex of fore tibia and fore tarsus. + + + +Structure +. +Integument +mostly dull, moderately shiny, especially on legs. +Head +elongated; anteocular portion as long as postocular or approximately so. Transversal (interocular) sulcus deep, situated somewhat posteriorly to middle of eyes; just anterior to it, on midline, a small oval fossa and also on midline, posteriorly to this sulcus, an oval small shallow tumescence ( +Figs. 2–3 +). Eyes prominent, subcircular in dorsal view, reaching dorsal outline of head at interocular sulcus; not reaching ventral margin of head, which is near from inferior margin of the eye ( +Figs. 2–3 +, +5 +). Area just behind interocular sulcus somewhat elevated laterally ( +Figs. 2–3 +, +5 +). Dorsal interocular distance about twice or somewhat less than twice the width of each eye. Antenna inserted closer to apex of head than to the eyes ( +Figs. 2–3 +, +5 +); antennal segments progressively thinner, very slender; segments I and III straight; segment II somewhat curved at distal half; segment IV somewhat curved, with apex triangular ( +Figs. 6–8 +, +9–18 +). First two visible labial segments thicker than the distal segment; apex of segment III approximately at level of midportion of eye; segment IV ending at level of anterior extremity of stridulitrum ( +Fig. 5 +). +Thorax +: pronotum pedunculate; petiole approximately 1.4 to 1.6 times as long as fore lobe, the latter moderately widened; anterior projections of collar rounded; hind lobe bell-shaped in dorsal view, hind border emarginated at mid portion; humeral angle with an elevated rounded tubercle ( +Figs. 1–2 +, +4–5 +). Lateral margins of stridulitrum conspicuous. Spine of scutellum somewhat elongated, directed straight upwards; spine of metanotum smaller than the spine of scutellum and directed obliquely backwards ( +Figs. 19–20 +). Fore legs slender ( +Figs. 4 +, +21 +); fore coxae elongated, approximately two times as long as fore lobe of pronotum; fore tibiae shorter than fore femora, somewhat curved ( +Figs. 4 +, +21 +); somewhat depressed in dorsal portion subapically; thickened at apex, where the inner surface is somewhat flattened and has a very small subdistal pecten ( +Fig. 23 +). Mid and hind legs very long and slender, with tibiae thinner and longer than femora and slightly curved ( +Figs. 24–26 +). Tarsi short, three-segmented, slender ( +Fig. 23 +). Forewings ( +Figs. 27–29 +) slender, long, surpassing apex of abdomen by approximately 0.3 to 0.5 mm, venation as in +Fig. 29 +; basal cell subtriangular, with its base truncated and with two basally veins emitted from its base; the outer vein shorter ( +Figs. 27–30 +); Pcu meeting discal cell somewhat beyond apex of basal cell ( +Figs. 27–29 +, +31 +); discal cell subpentagonal; pterostigma ending far from apex of the wing ( +Figs. 27–29 +). Hind wings reaching basal third of tergite VII; venation as in +Fig. 32 +. Although there is a pale linear marking above R+M, which could suggest a branch from this vein, a microscopic examination of the region made it clear that it is not a true vein, and therefore R+M is not bifurcate ( +Fig. 33 +). Anal lobe with region between 2A and hind border not sclerotized, just somewhat pigmented ( +Fig. 34 +). +Abdomen: +segments II–III narrow; segments III–V progressively slightly widened towards apex; segment VI slightly narrowed towards apex; segment VII strongly narrowed towards apex, dorsally with a short tongue-shaped prolongation posteriorly, with a rounded posterior margin, slightly approaching tip of pygophore (35–36). Eight sternite covering approximately half of the pygophore, ventrally ( +Figs. 37–38 +). Connexival segments simple, straight ( +Fig. 35 +). + + + +FIGURES 24–26 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, male, 24, mid and hind femora, scale bar 4.0 mm, 25–26, scale bar 2.0 mm, 25, mid tibia, 26, hind tibia. + + + + +FIGURES 27–29 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, male, dorsal view, 27–28, forewings, scale bar 3.0 mm, 27, holotype, 28, paratype, 29, venation of left forewing. + + + + +FIGURES 30–34 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, male, 30–31, left forewing, scale bar 1.0 mm, 30, subbasal portion, arrows point to outer (short free) vein emitted from base of basal cell, 31, region including apex of basal cell ( +bc +), base of discal cell ( +dc +) and +Pcu +cross vein, 32–34, left hind wing, 32, venation, 33–34, scale bar 0.5 mm, 33, subapical portion, arrows points to pale linear marking above R+M, 34, subbasal portion, +al +, anal lobe. + + + + +FIGURES 35–40 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, male, 35–36, abdomen, scale 2.0 mm, 35, dorsal view (wings moved away), 36, ventral view, 37, abdominal segments VII–VIII and genitalia, lateral view, 38–39, ventral view, 38, eighth sternite, pygophore and parameres, 39, apex of pygophore and parameres, 40, pygophore and left paramere, dorsal view. + + + + +FIGURES 41–48 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, male genitalia, 41–42, pygophore without parameres, 41, ventral view, 42, lateral view, 43, paramere, scale bar 0.2 mm, 44–45, phallus, scale bar 0.3 mm, +art app +, articulatory apparatus, +ba +, basal arm, +vsc +, ventral sclerotizations on phallosoma, 44, lateral view, +str +, struts, 45, ventral view, 46–48, dorsal view, 46, articulatory apparatus, +ba +, basal arm, 47, apical portion of articulatory apparatus and elongated ventral sclerotizations on phallosoma, 48, apical portion of articulatory apparatus, struts and lateral weak sclerotizations. + + + + +FIGURES 49–51 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, female, scale bar 5.0 mm, 49, dorsal view, 50–51, lateral view. + + + + +FIGURES 52–54 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, female, dorsal view, 52–53, head and pronotum, scale bar 2.0 mm, 54, head. + + + +Male genitalia +: pygophore subrectangular in dorsal and ventral views ( +Figs. 38, 40–41 +); anterior dorsal sclerotization narrow; basal margin curved backwards on midportion ventrally ( +Fig. 40–41 +); posterior process somewhat large, apex triangular, acute ( +Fig. 39 +, +41–42 +). Parameres symmetrical, curved and with moderately long, thin and non-numerous setae in distal half; apex rounded ( +Figs. 38–40 +, +43 +). Phallus symmetrical ( +Figs. 44–45 +). Articulatory apparatus ( +art app +) with basal plate extension elongated ( +Figs. 44, 46 +), basal plates fused at basal half and at apical portion ( +Fig. 46 +); basal arms ( +ba +) very short ( +Figs. 44–46 +). A pair of elongated ventral sclerotizations on phallosoma ( +vsc +) (= ventral sclerotization of phallobase sensu +Wygodzinsky 1966 +), in shape of slender rods ( +Figs. 44–45, 47 +). Struts ( +str +) largely fused, widened toward apex, largely divided at basal extremity, and very narrowly at apical third (“incised” sensu +Wygodzinsky 1966 +), between the oval-shaped lobes present at apical half ( +Fig. 48 +). Laterally to these lobes, and fused to them medially, weak somewhat large sclerotizations are present ( +Fig. 48 +). Between the ventral sclerotizations on the phallosoma ( +vsc +) and the struts ( +str +), three small and illdefined sclerotized, irregular thickenings, without forming clear processes, in approximately distal half of phallosoma ( +Fig. 44 +). Endosoma wall smooth, simple, without noticeable expansions. + + + +FIGURES 55–59 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, female, lateral view, 55, head and fore lobe of pronotum, scale bar 1.0 mm, 56–58, antennal segments coloration pattern, 56, segment I, 57, segments II and III, arrows point to segment III, A–B, different recorded patterns, 58, apex of segment III and segment IV, 59, scutellum spine and apex of spine of metanotum. + + + +Female. +Figures 49–79 +. Measurements: +Table 2 +. The following differences in relation to males were recorded. +Coloration +: Antenna: segment I: the first (subbasal) annulus approximately four times longer than the width of the segment, the next three annuli two to three times as long as the width of the segment and the fifth (subapical) annulus generally shorter than the width of segment ( +Fig. 56 +); segment II: three narrow pale annuli approximately twice to five times as long as the width of the segment ( +Fig. 57 +). +Thorax: +pale coloration on margins of meso- and hind metathoracic lobes somewhat broader. Whitish spots on posterior portion of mesopleura and metapleura somewhat larger. Legs: at apical portion of fore coxa, a moderately irregular large distal pale spot, interrupted on dorsal and ventral surfaces, and therefore not forming a ring ( +Fig. 60 +). Paler coloration on dorsal surface of fore femora restricted to approximately the proximal three-fourths; there are four pale spots along the segment, which are somewhat larger, reaching a greater extent on dorsal surface, and are also paler than those in males, the two additional spots lie between the midpoint and the whitish large apical spot, and sometimes they are united on inner surface, forming a longer spot; most or all of the large and medium-sized processes of both series with their basal portions pale to whitish, and the area surrounding their insertion generally pale too ( +Fig. 60 +). The markings, somewhat distal to midpoint on fore tibiae, are paler and sometimes form a complete smaller annulus ( +Fig. 60 +). Forewing mostly brownish; a transverse to oblique small, sometimes incomplete, pale stripe at middle portion of discal cell and a few small pale spots inside this cell and distally to posterior vein of the same; distal fourth with a moderately large oblique whitish stripe followed by a blackish apical portion (Figs. 64, 66). Hind wings hyaline with a small subapical reddish spot on upper margin and an even smaller, almost imperceptible reddish spot near middle portion of upper half of the wing ( +Fig. 72 +). +Abdomen +( +Figs. 73–77 +) somewhat paler on tergite III and basal half of tergite IV, extensively marked with pale and whitish markings on segments IV–VII. Tergites IV–VII with a conspicuous scattered irregular pattern of pale and grayish markings. Connexivum with conspicuous whitish markings, on dorsal connexival segments: basal and median spots on segment III, large markings on basal and distal portions of segments IV–VI and subbasally and distally on segment VII; on ventral connexival segments: similar markings to the dorsal segments, but their extent is somewhat different: only a basal spot on segment III, a larger basal spot on segment IV; shorter on distal portions of segments IV–V, larger on basal portions of segments V–VI; on segment VII, the proximal spot is basally located. On the sternites, the whitish markings are generally more conspicuous than in male; sternite VII with an additional pair of submedian spots on basal half and another pair of sublateral spots on distal half. Genital segments darkened with pale markings on midportion of tergites VIII and IX; on the latter, more extensively and including the posterior margin too; on basomedian portion of gonocoxites. +Vestiture +: Antenna: segment I with a few longer thin scattered somewhat curved setae on inner surface at apical extremity too; about twelve isolated elements interpreted as trichobothria were observed on segment II. Fore femur: posteroventral series composed of about eleven to sixteen large and medium-sized spiniferous processes, among these, approximately seventy-one to ninety-one small spiniferous processes. Lengths of larger processes combined with apical spines about four-fifths of diameter of segment ( +Fig. 61 +). Anteroventral series composed of nineteen to twenty spiniferous tubercles, among which there are about one hundred and six to one hundred and thirtyfive sharp small spines. The setae accompanying the anteroventral series are somewhat larger. Ventral surface of fore tibiae with about 26 to 29 nine larger spiniferous processes. +Structure +. +Head +( +Figs. 52, 54–55 +): eyes smaller, inferior margin of the eye somewhat far from the ventral margin of head; area just behind interocular sulcus somewhat less elevated laterally; dorsal interocular distance about thrice the width of each eye. The small oval fossa anterior to midpoint of transverse sulcus somewhat more evident; oval shallow tumescence posterior to transverse sulcus smaller. +Thorax +: petiole somewhat more than twice to approximately 2.5 times as long as fore lobe; hind lobe proportionally smaller with hind margin somewhat narrower ( +Figs. 52–53 +). Spines of scutellum and metanotum obliquely directed upwards ( +Fig. 59 +). Fore coxae approximately 2.5 times as long as fore lobe of pronotum. Forewing narrow, short, reaching only the level of midportion to the distal third of tergite IV ( +Figs. 49–51 +, 64–66, 73–74). Basal cell triangular, varying in size, approximately one-third in length, with a single directed vein emitted from its base (Figs. 64–69); in one +paratype +, however, in the left forewing, there is a short free vein emitted from the base of the basal cell, in addition to elongated vein leading to axillary region ( +Fig. 70 +), while in its right forewing there is a rudimentary basal portion of a similar short free vein ( +Fig. 71 +). Pcu variably positioned: ranging from meeting basal cell far above its apex to meeting discal cell near or somewhat farther beyond apex of basal cell (Figs. 64–71). Discal cell subrectangular (Figs. 64–66). Pterostigma ending relatively farther from apex of the wing (Fig. 65). Hind wing very short, reaching only the anterior border of tergite I (Fig. 66); its upper margin enlarged and somewhat sclerotized; at the end of this enlarged margin, a small area with a reddish tinge; membrane very thin with a few incomplete delicate apparent veins ( +Fig. 72 +). +Abdomen: +segments II–III narrow; segment IV widened towards apex, segments V– VI greatly widened; segment VII smaller and narrowed towards apex, dorsally with apical margin rounded and not covering genital segments ( +Figs. 73–77 +). The connexival segments are straight or slightly curved; the lateral margins of the dorsal plates are entire, while the postero-lateral angles of the ventral plates of segments IV–VI are very slightly expanded outwards ( +Figs. 73–76 +). The more enlarged portion of abdomen, from apical half of segment IV to apex of segment VI, on dorsal and ventral views is subrectangular in shape ( +Figs. 73–76 +); this portion, together with segment VII, forms a rounded bulge on lateral view while the pleural membrane is much more developed, folded and longitudinally pleated, in which folds have sclerotized strips ( +Fig. 77 +). +External female genitalia +( +Figs. 78–79 +): simple; tergites VIII and IX forming a subhorizontal surface; tergite VIII moderately short, transversely subrectangular; tergite IX large, slightly narrowing towards apex, gonocoxites (of segment VIII) large, apex rounded. + + + + +Distribution. +Brazil +, state of +Minas Gerais +. + + + + +FIGURES 60–63 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, female, lateral view, 60, head and fore legs, scale bar 2.0 mm, 61, fore femur, basal portion, scale bar 0.5 mm, 62–63, scale bar 0.3 mm, 62, fore tibia, subapical third, 63, apex of fore tibia and fore tarsus. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+FIGURES 64–66 +. +Dohrnemesa + + +kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, female, dorsal +view, scale bar 2.0 mm, 64, forewings, 65, venation of
right forewing, 66, petiole, hindlobe of pronotum, left forewing, exceptapex and right hind wing (pointed by the arrow, right
forewing moved laterally).
+ + + +FIGURES 67–72 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, female, dorsal view, 67–71, portion of left forewing including +Pcu +cross vein in different specimens, +bc +, basal cell, +dc +, base of discal cell, scale bar 0.5 mm, 70–71, forewings of a paratype with additional short free veins emitted from basal cell, 70, left forewing, arrows point to outer (short free) vein emitted from base of basal cell, 71, right forewing, arrows point to rudimentary basal portion of an outer (short free) vein, 72, hind wing, scale bar 0.3 mm. + + + + +FIGURES 73–79 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, female, 73–77, abdomen, except basal segments, 73–75, dorsal view, scale bar 2.0 mm, 75, tergites III and IV exposed (forewings moved away), 76–77, scale bar 1.0 mm, 76, ventral view, 77, lateral view, 78–79, external genitalia, 78, dorsal view, 79, lateral view. + + + + +TABLE 2 +. Measurements (mm) of female specimens (N=5) of + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
MeanSDMaximumMinimum
Total length22.140.7223.021.1
Head length (excluding neck)1.960.082.01.8
Anteocular portion length0.740.050.80.7
Postocular portion length0.840.050.90.8
Head width across eyes1.00.01.01.0
Interocular distance0.60.00.60.6
Transverse width of eye0.20.00.20.2
Antennal segment I length11.660.5912.410.8
Antennal segment II length11.560.6712.510.7
Ant. segment III length0.90.00.90.9
+Ant. segment IV length +(n=4) +2.30.252.62.0
Labial segment II length0.560.050.60.5
Labial segment III length0.70.00.70.7
Labial segment IV length1.160.051.21.1
Fore lobe of pronotum length1.560.111.71.4
Petiole length3.880.254.13.6
Hind lobe of pronotum length1.780.172.01.5
Hind lobe of pronotum max. width1.20.01.21.2
Forewing length7.060.187.36.9
Hindwing length1.40.121.61.3
Fore coxa length3.90.14.03.8
Fore femur length8.580.49.18.0
Fore tibia length7.280.327.86.9
Fore tarsus length0.620.020.650.6
Mid femur length15.780.5416.515.2
Mid tibia length23.381.1424.922.2
Mid tarsus length0.520.020.550.5
Hind femur length20.341.0821.619.0
Hind tibia length31.121.6733.529.5
+Hind tarsus length +(n=4) +0.60.00.60.6
Abdomen length10.50.3810.910.0
Abdomen maximum width2.50.072.62.4
+ + + +Etymology +. The specific epithet is the combination of two indigenous words (Tupi-Guarani): +kuara +, meaning “hole”, “nest”, “hiding place” and +jucassaba +which means “killer”, “killing” referring to the condition of a cave hunter. To be treated as a noun in apposition, ending not to be changed. + + + + +Specimens +examined. +BRAZIL + +, + +Minas Gerais + +, +Pains +, +MALE +HOLOTYPE +: + +Gruta +da Torre + +[“tower cave”] II, ( +20º25'21.04"S +45º36'03.58"W +), + +03.ii.2017 + +, +R.L. Ferreira +leg. ( +MNRJ +) + +; + +PARATYPES +: + +Gruta +da Torre + +[“tower cave”] II, ( +20º25'15.92"S +45º36'08.08"W +), +R.L. Ferreira +leg., + +03.ii.2017 + +, +1 male +, +2 females +( +ISLA +21277) + +; + + +01.x.2015 + +, +1 female +( +MNRJ +), +2 females +( +ISLA +12095, 12081); +Gruta do Ronco +[“snoring cave”], ( +20º25'50"S +45º36'41"W +), + +28.xi.1999 + +, R.L. +Ferreira +& +M.S. Silva +leg., +1 male +( +ISLA +12086). + + + + + +Habitat and natural history. +Specimens of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +were found in three caves in the karst region of Arcos-Pains-Doresópolis (state of +Minas Gerais +, +Brazil +) ( +Figs. 80–81 +). Specifically, the caves where the specimens were found are located in the municipality of Pains. This region presents the largest concentration of caves in South America (around 2,500 known caves). More than 300 caves were sampled in the area, and specimens were only found in three caves. However, it is interesting to note that these caves present similar conditions, including small dimensions (less than 100 meters) ( +Fig. 81 +), presence of dry substrates and entrances with many collapsed blocks ( +Fig. 80 +). Furthermore, the caves are located in a specific place in the southern region of the karst area, near the urban area of the municipality of Córrego Fundo. + + + +FIGURES 80–83 +. + +Dohrnemesa kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov +. + +, 80–81, natural habitat, 80, external overview of the entrance of the caves, 81, interior of one of the caves, 82–83, live specimens in their natural habitat, 82, male, 83, female. + + + +The specimens were always found on the cave walls, usually near the ceiling ( +Figs. 82–83 +). Most of them were found near the cave entrances, but always in disphotic areas. These regions usually present many accidental or transient invertebrate species; thus, it is plausible to assume that specimens of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +prefer these areas because of the regular supply of prey. Nymphs were also observed in the caves, indicating that the species might be reproducing in such habitats, what would indicate a troglophilic condition. However, since we did not perform any collections in the epigean surroundings, it is impossible to determine the importance of the caves as a habitat for the species. Furthermore, the area has undergone intense impact from mining activities (since the 1960’s), which remove the limestone to produce cement. In addition, the natural vegetation of the area has also suffered intense changes over recent decades, especially due to expansion of agricultural activities. This has resulted in a rather fragmented landscape, in which the remaining vegetation is mainly associated with the tops and immediate surroundings of the limestone outcrops (which are unsuitable for human use). Accordingly, it is also possible that the species has been sheltering in caves due to the severe alterations to which the external habitats have been subjected over recent years. Thus, further studies focusing on this species are essential to determine what their current distribution is (in epigean habitats), as well as whether they are threatened. + + + + +Comments +. Almost all the features of the male of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +are in accordance with the definition of +Dohrnemesa +( +Wygodzinsky 1945 +, +1966 +, +Forero 2004 +), therefore the placement of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +in this genus is justified. + + +The only discordances relate to its total length (18.5–18.8 mm), which is somewhat longer than the length of the species previously attributed to +Dohrnemesa +( +10–16 mm +); and to the region between 2A and the hind border of the anal lobe in the hind wing ( +Fig. 34 +), which is not sclerotized in + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +, although it has been recorded as distinctly sclerotized in +Dohrnemesa +( +Wygodzinsky 1966 +). + + +All the features of the male genitalia of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +( +Figs. 37–48 +) are very similar to those of the other species of +Dohrnemesa +too, as summarized by +Wygodzinsky (1966) +. + + +The male of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +most closely resembles the male of + +D. lanei +Wygodzinsky, 1945 + +. This species was described based on a single male from the state of +São Paulo +, +Brazil +( +Wygodzinsky 1945 +), with no further records of it. + + +The males of these species share similarities, including the total length (18.5–18.8 mm for + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +and 16.0 mm for + +D. lanei + +), general dark coloration with extensive pale markings distributed in a similar pattern on thorax and legs, and many structural features. The few features of the male genitalia in + +D. lanei + +that have been described ( +Wygodzinsky 1945 +), such as shape and general appearance of the posterior process of pygophore and parameres, seem very similar in + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +too. The two species can be separated by the following set of characteristics: 1—antennal segments I and II with five and three pale annuli respectively in + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +( +Figs. 6–7 +) and four pale annuli in both segments in + +D. lanei + +; 2—fore femora with a pair of pale spots on basal half, and an apical larger whitish spot in + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +( +Fig. 21 +) and 4–5 whitish annuli in + +D. lanei + +; 3—sternites with several whitish markings in + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +( +Fig. 36 +) and uniformly blackish in + +D. lanei + +; 4—postocular portion of head with a median distinct tubercle ( + +D. lanei + +) or an oval small shallow tumescence ( + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +); 5—lengths of larger processes of fore femora combined with apical spines about three-fourths of diameter of segment ( + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +) or about as long as its diameter ( + +D. lanei + +); 6—spine of scutellum straight ( + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +, +Figs. 4 +, +19–20 +) or obliquely directed upwards ( + +D. lanei + +); 7—Pcu meeting discal cell somewhat distad ( + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +, +Figs. 27–29 +, +31 +) or proximad ( + +D. lanei + +) of the apex of basal cell on forewing; 8—connexival segments simple, straight, in + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +( +Fig. 35 +), and somewhat enlarged at posterolateral angles in + +D. lanei + +. + + +An attempt was made to locate the +holotype +of + +D. lanei + +. +Wygodzinsky (1945) +mentioned that it had been deposited in the collection of the Zoology Sector of the Department of Agriculture of the State of +São Paulo +. This institution and its collection were incorporated by the University of +São Paulo +, into its Zoology Museum (“Museu de Zoologia da + +Universidade de +São Paulo + +”, MZSP)( +Marinoni & Marinoni 2012 +). However, after a careful search in the collection of this institution, Dr Carlos Campaner, of the curator team of MZSP, kindly informed the first author that the +holotype +of + +D. lanei + +was not found there. Therefore, it can be considered to have been lost. + + + + + +Dohrnemesa lanei + +was considered to be close to + +D. santosi +Wygodzinsky, 1945 + +, which was also described based on a single male from the state of +São Paulo +( +Wygodzinsky 1945 +, +1966 +). The +holotype +of + +D. santosi + +remains deposited in the National Museum of +Rio de Janeiro +(MNRJ) (Figs. 84–87), with no other known specimens of this species. It is noteworthy that some of the features pointed out by +Wygodzinsky (1945 +, +1966 +) for separating + +D. lanei + +from + +D. santosi + +are shared by the latter and + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +such as: connexival segments simple, straight and with pale markings; Pcu meeting discal cell somewhat distad of the apex of discal cell in forewing; larger processes of fore femora combined with apical spines shorter than diameter of segment. + + +However, the general coloration pattern of + +D. santosi + +(Fig. 84) is quite diverse from + +D. lanei + +and + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +( +Fig. 1 +). Additionally, + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +and + +D. lanei + +have a petiole that is distinctly longer than the fore lobe of the pronotum and the process of the pygophore is acute and triangular, while in + +D. santosi + +the petiole is not longer than the fore lobe (Fig. 84) and the process of pygophore is rounded. There is no tubercle or elevation at the median portion of the postocular region in the latter species, either ( +Wygodzinsky 1945 +, +1966 +). + + + + +Surprisingly, some features of the female of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +, particularly its brachypterous condition, are in accordance with the definition of + +Polauchenia + +, such as: forewings greatly reduced, reaching about middle of abdomen ( +Figs. 49–51 +, 64, 74) and with a single directed vein emitted from the base of their basal cell (Figs. 64–66); extremely reduced hind wings (Fig. 66); abdomen wider ( +Wygodzinsky 1966 +). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+FIGURES 84–87 +. + +Dohrnemesa santosi +Wygodzinsky, + +1945, maleholotype deposited in MNRJ (courtesy of the team of the
digitization project of the Entomological collection ofMNRJ andLuiz A. A. Costa), 84, dorsal view, 85, ventral view, 86,
lateral view, 87, labels.
+ + +Nevertheless, two differences were promptly recorded. The total length (21.1–23.0 mm) is slightly longer than previously recognized for + +Polauchenia + +( +11–20 mm +in length) ( +Wygodzinsky 1966 +) and the abdomen is not lobate. + + +Considering that there was only a small difference in length, this can possibly be accepted as a small extension of the range of total length in + +Polauchenia + +, thus increasing it from +11–20 mm +to +11–23 mm +. + + +Concerning the shape of the [enlarged portion of the] abdomen, although +Wygodzinsky (1966) +considered it always to be lobate in brachypterous females of + +Polauchenia + +, his assumption was based only on the female of + +P. marcapata +Wygodzinsky, 1966 + +, the sole species in which a brachypterous female had been known until now. Therefore, for the taxonomic value of the lobate abdomen to be ascertained, the presence or absence of this feature would need to be determined among the females of more species. + + +On the other hand, the recorded variation of the venation of the forewings in females of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +deserves some comments. The Pcu was found to be variably positioned, ranging from meeting the basal cell far proximad of its apex to meeting the discal cell somewhat farther distad of the apex of the basal cell (Figs. 64–71). + + +Although in most of the females the basal cell had a single directed vein emitted from its base, in one female +paratype +, the left forewing clearly showed a short free vein emitted from the base of the basal cell in addition to an elongated vein leading to the axillary region ( +Fig. 70 +), while its right forewing showed a rudimentary similar short free vein ( +Fig. 71 +). At first sight, it would be plausible to consider these variations to be simple isolated anomalies, especially regarding the wing reduction in the present case. However, it is noteworthy that the presence of this short vein emitted from the base of the basal cell is one of the main differences among the few that exist between + +Polauchenia + +and +Dohrnemesa +, genera that are considered close to each other ( +Wygodzinsky 1945 +, +1966 +), while the position at which the Pcu met the basal cell was considered to have taxonomic significance in these genera, for separating the species ( +Wygodzinsky 1966 +). The venation of the wings is regarded as furnishing excellent taxonomic characteristics at the generic and tribal levels in + +Emesinae ( +Wygodzinsky 1966 +) + +and has been used extensively to diagnose and/or separate supra-specific taxa, without questioning their possible intra-specific variation ( +Gil-Santana & Marques 2005 +). Gil- Santana +et al +. (1999) recorded intra-specific variation in the number of cells in the forewing of + +Mayemesa lapinhaensis +( +Wygodzinsky, 1950 +) + +. Because the number of cells in the forewing was the main characteristic separating + +Mayemesa + +from another genus of +Emesini +, the monotypic genus + +Amilcaria +, + +Gil-Santana +et al +. (1999) + + +proposed that + +Amilcaria + +should be regarded as a junior synonymy of + +Mayemesa + +. Taking into account that most species of +Dohrnemesa +and + +Polauchenia + +have been described and/or recorded based on a single or only a few specimens ( +McAtee & Malloch 1925 +, +Wygodzinsky 1945 +, +1947 +, +1950 +, +1958 +, +1966 +, Maldonado 1968, +Forero 2006 +, +Gil-Santana & Ferreira 2016 +), the possible intra-specific variation of some characteristics may remain unknown. Therefore, the significance of the abovementioned variations in the forewings of females of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +, i.e., whether they are merely isolated anomalies associated with a brachypterous condition, or whether they are truly intra-specific variations with possible taxonomical inferences, will be ascertained if or when more specimens of both +Dohrnemesa +spp. and + +Polauchenia + +spp. are examined in the future. + + +Additionally, the female of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +shows a general resemblance to the female of + +Polauchenia marcapata + +. This species was described based on two females from +Peru +( +Wygodzinsky 1966 +). On the basis of +Wygodzinsky (1966) +, +Forero (2006) +referred that + +P. marcapata + +would also have been known from +Bolivia +. However, +Wygodzinsky (1966) +listed his +type +specimens as being from Marcapata River ( +holotype +) and Valle Chanchamayo ( +paratype +), both located in +Peru +. Maldonado (1990) also cited the species as being limited to +Peru +. +Forero (2004) +recorded this species in +Colombia +, but subsequently ( +Forero 2006 +) alleged that the identification of the specimen from +Colombia +, which he had considered to be very close to + +P. marcapata + +, required confirmation because the humeral angles of the pronotum were pointed rather than blunt, and the color pattern of the hemelytra was less marked than in + +P. marcapata + +. Hence, additional specimens would be needed to reaffirm the identification. Therefore, so far, only +Peru +and possibly +Colombia +should be included in the geographic distribution of + +P. marcapata + +. + + +The following structural differences can promptly separate the females of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +and + +P. marcapata + +, respectively: 1—length: 21.1–23.0 mm versus 17.5 mm; 2—postocular region of the head: without pointed elevations versus with distinctive pointed elevations; 3—shape of posterior widening of abdomen: subrectangular versus subspherical; and 4—posterior margin of connexival segments: not lobate versus lobate. + + +Nonetheless, the decision to make the current placement of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +in +Dohrnemesa +was taken primarily because of the features of its male, which were shown to be very compatible with those attributed to +Dohrnemesa +( +Wygodzinsky 1945 +, +1966 +, +Forero 2004 +). + + +Although the females of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +present similarities to + +P. marcapata + +rather than to known females of species of +Dohrnemesa +, this does not compromise the current placement of the new species in the latter genus. + + +This is firstly because in half of the species of +Dohrnemesa +, only males are known ( +Wygodzinsky 1945 +, +1958 +, +1966 +, +Gil-Santana & Ferreira 2016 +), including in + +D. lanei + +, which was considered to be close to + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +It is possible that some (unknown) females of other species of +Dohrnemesa +have features similar to those of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +, but have remained unrecorded so far. Additionally, with the exception of the apterous species + +D. feminata + +, for which placement in +Dohrnemesa +is uncertain, the known females of +Dohrnemesa +spp. ( + +D. buyassuana +Wygodzinsky, 1958 + +, + +D. carvalhoi +Wygodzinsky, 1966 + +and + +D. reimoseri +Wygodzinsky, 1950 + +) are fully winged. Therefore, because + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +is the first species of +Dohrnemesa +with a brachypterous female that has been discovered, features associated with reduced wings have only been recorded from one female of this genus so far. Hence, some apparent similarities between + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +and + +P. marcapata + +may be more related to their brachypterous condition than to systematic proximity between them. + + +Secondly, it is possible that the venation in reduced forewings of females is prone to anomalies, which would diminish or impair their use as reliable taxonomic characteristics. In this case, absence of a short free vein emitted from the base of the basal cell should be disregarded as a reliable generic characteristic for differentiating between the two genera under discussion in relation to brachypterous females. In this regard, the assumption of +Wygodzinsky (1966) +that the venation in the reduced forewing of brachypterous females of + +Polauchenia + +would be complete can be shown not to be true, taking into account what was recorded here in relation to females of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + + + +Thirdly, considering that no males of + +P. marcapata + +have yet been described, it is possible that the taxonomic position of this species might need to be reviewed if or when males are reported. + + +Fourthly, given that + +Polauchenia + +and +Dohrnemesa +seem to be closely related genera ( +Wygodzinsky 1945 +, +1966 +), occurrence of variable degrees of resemblance between the females of species of these genera could be quite possible. + + +Regarding sexual dimorphism in +Dohrnemesa +spp., a universal sexual difference among +Emesinae +is the width of abdomen, which is generally slight in fully winged forms, but sometimes very conspicuous if the female has reduced or absent wings ( +Wygodzinsky 1966 +). In fact, while the abdomen was recorded as somewhat less wide at the middle portion in the male of + +Dohrnemesa carvalhoi + +, compared with its female ( +Gil-Santana & Ferreira 2016 +), the females of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +present abdominal segments IV–VI that are much wider ( +Figs. 49–51 +, +73– 77 +) than those of the males (4, 35–36). In the latter species, the eyes of the males were shown to be evidently larger ( +Figs. 2–3 +, +5 +, +52, 54–55 +), while those of the males of + +D. carvalhoi + +were only somewhat larger ( +Gil-Santana & Ferreira 2016 +), like in many other species of +Emesinae +, in which the eyes of the females are smaller than those of the males ( +Wygodzinsky 1966 +). Females of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +were also recorded as being larger and more conspicuously marked, mainly on enlarged abdominal segments. The latter difference was particularly more pronounced on the exposed tergites (i.e. not covered by the shortened forewing) ( +Figs. 35 +, +73–75 +). + + +On the other hand, the remarkable development of the pleural membrane in the enlarged portion of the abdomen (distal half of segment IV and subsequent segments) in the females of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +, which was folded with longitudinal sclerotized strips ( +Fig. 77 +), is striking. While this resembles the abdomen of females of the triatomine + +Dipetalogaster maximus +(Uhler, 1894) + +, in which an analogous folded and longitudinally pleated abdominal pleura allows unusual expansion of the abdomen when the specimen feeds ( +Lent & Wygodzinsky 1979 +), no similar description could be found among species of +Emesinae +. + + +The discovery of + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +makes it necessary to make slight modifications of the detailed generic description of +Dohrnemesa +provided by +Wygodzinsky (1966) +: total body length is +10–16 mm +for other species, but reaches 18.8 (males)–23 (females) mm in + +D. kuarajucassaba + + +sp. nov. + +; region between 2A and hind border of the anal lobe in the hind wing sclerotized or not; females fully winged or brachypterous; brachypterous females show: forewings with variable venation, reaching at most distal third of tergite IV; hind wing very short, reaching anterior border of tergite I; abdominal segments IV–VI enlarged. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/73/87/37738795C731FFE245F4FB1DFA6FF91E.xml b/data/37/73/87/37738795C731FFE245F4FB1DFA6FF91E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..944b5b3707d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/73/87/37738795C731FFE245F4FB1DFA6FF91E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ + + + +A new species of Dohrnemesa and a new species of Polauchenia from Brazil (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Emesinae) + + + +Author + +Gil-Santana, Hélcio R. + + + +Author + +Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2017 + +2017-10-25 + + +4338 + + +2 + + +201 +240 + + + +journal article +31752 +10.11646/zootaxa.4338.2.1 +a41ab71e-5763-40bc-93fb-b3e61479a598 +1175-5326 +1036014 +6043549C-C784-4EAF-9BC6-E009027B4F47 + + + + + + +Key for the species of + +PoLauchenia + +, modified from +Wygodzinsky (1966) + + + + + + + + +1. Postocular region of the head with a median spine, besides a pair of lateral spined tubercles...... + +unicornis +Maldonado, 1968 + + + + +- Postocular region of the head without a median spine, with or without a pair of lateral spined or rounded tubercles........ 2 + + + + +2. Petiole of pronotum quite longer, at least 1.5 times as long as the fore lobe........................................ 3 + + +- Petiole of pronotum little, if any longer than fore lobe......................................................... 5 + + + + + +3. Petiole of pronotum approximately 1.5 times as long as the fore lobe; length +14 mm +............. + +P. paraprotentor + + +sp. nov. + + + + + +- Petiole of pronotum at least twice longer than the length of fore lobe; length +15 mm +or longer.........................4 + + + + + + +4. Length +17.5 mm +; females (males unknown) brachypterous, the forewing reaching at about middle of abdomen........................................................................................ + +marcapata +Wygodzinsky, 1966 + + + + + +- Length not more than +15 mm +; humeri spined; female slightly brachypterous, forewing reaching far posterior to the middle of abdomen............................................................... .. + +protentor +McAtee & Malloch, 1925 + + + + + + + +5. Length +11 mm +; postocular region of the head without projections, spines of scutellum and metanotum yellowish........................................................................................ + +schubarti +Wygodzinsky, 1950 + + + + + +- Length +16 mm +; postocular region of the head with a pair of spined conical tubercles; spines of scutellum blackish................................................................................. + +biannulata +McAtee & Malloch, 1925 + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/73/9F/37739F9675313927C684267D624872F4.xml b/data/37/73/9F/37739F9675313927C684267D624872F4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a90f68851de --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/73/9F/37739F9675313927C684267D624872F4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@ + + + +Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 2. Nymphaceae bis Primulaceae (2 nd edition) (p. 956): Ranunculaceae + + + +Author + +Hess, Hans Ernst + + + +Author + +Landolt, Elias + + + +Author + +Hirzel, Rosmarie + +text + +1976 +Birkhaeuser Verlag + + +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.292251 + +book +292251 +10.5281/zenodo.292251 +3-7643-0527-4 + + + +<subSubSection id="35EAA0BEA4109CB872902E4391E47052" pageId="null" pageNumber="55" type="nomenclature"> +<paragraph id="2BF49E594A91493630FDF54FAE34C8AD" pageId="null" pageNumber="55"> +<taxonomicName id="9EA54E175EB2495A539588F0ADA3DC13" authority="(L.) Miller" authorityName="Miller" baseAuthorityName="L." class="Magnoliopsida" family="Ranunculaceae" genus="Pulsatilla" kingdom="Plantae" order="Ranunculales" pageId="null" pageNumber="55" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="vernalis"> +<pageBreakToken id="02E3CC48CAE2C96D1F3051299DF23D52" pageId="null" pageNumber="55" start="start">Pulsatilla</pageBreakToken> +<normalizedToken id="A18FAFCC5CF26D8B55DBB200900FE5CE" originalValue="vernális" pageId="null" pageNumber="55">vernalis</normalizedToken> +( +<authorityName id="AC800974E53907DFDE9A7E5E3F031CB0" pageId="null" pageNumber="55">L.</authorityName> +) Miller +</taxonomicName> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="70C0B9914FEF30A9417591F8FA49097C" pageId="null" pageNumber="55" type="reference_group"> +<paragraph id="75C742FC8984BB5AD7F38DD3B5F42E6D" pageId="null" pageNumber="55"> +( +<taxonomicName id="E48D0D5B9BD0783091B5E11354347F18" authority="L." authorityName="L." class="Magnoliopsida" family="Ranunculaceae" genus="Anemone" kingdom="Plantae" order="Ranunculales" pageId="null" pageNumber="55" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="vernalis"> +<emphasis id="44B0DA6977836DF9D3DBFE2B55110833" italics="true" pageId="null" pageNumber="55">Anemone vernalis</emphasis> +<authorityName id="79030C724A1BBC014950DA9B1A832592" pageId="null" pageNumber="55">L.</authorityName> +</taxonomicName> +) +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="E8473E5C164AA04E713D9DD1D83113A0" pageId="null" pageNumber="55" type="vernacular_names"> +<paragraph id="E9DF97EB81A2B2A75834B1E2178741FD" pageId="null" pageNumber="55"> +<normalizedToken id="E1BE3B116FD5410D2FDA3F2371DB2CF7" originalValue="Frühlings-Anemone" pageId="null" pageNumber="55">Fruehlings-Anemone</normalizedToken> +, Pelz-Anemone +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> + + + +5-15 cm hoch, im Fruchtzustand bis 35 cm hoch; Stengel bogig aufsteigend oder aufrecht, lang und zottig behaart. + +Grundstaendige +Blaetter +ueberwinternd + +(die neuen +Blaetter +erscheinen nach der +Bluete +, im Gebiet nur bei dieser Art so!), zahlreich, mit langen, dicht und lang behaarten Stielen, +lederig +, zerstreut und lang behaart, klein, meist nicht +ueber +5 cm lang, ohne Stiel kaum +laenger +als breit, +1fach gefiedert +, mit 3 oder 5 Abschnitten, die ++/- +tief 2-5teilig sind; Zipfel nicht +ueber +0,5 cm breit, mit 1-3 breiten, bikonvexen +Zaehnen +. + +Stengelblaetter +am Grunde scheidenartig verwachsen + +, aus zahlreichen, schmalen, vom Grunde an +verschmaelerten +, zottig behaarten Zipfeln bestehend. +Bluete +auf kurzem, 1-3 cm langem, zottig behaartem Stiel, zuerst meist aufrecht. +Perigonblaetter +meist 6, 1,5-3 cm lang, zuerst +glockenfoermig +zusammenneigend, spater ++/- +ausgebreitet, + +innerseits +weiss + +, +ausserseits +blau, rosa oder violett, gelblich und zottig behaart. +Honigblaetter +klein und unscheinbar, den +Staubblaettern +aehnlich +. Der behaarte Griffel ist zur Fruchtzeit 3-4 cm lang. - Blute: +Fruehling +und +frueher +Sommer. + + +Zylologische Angaben. 2n += +16: +Ohne Herkunftsangabe des Materials ( +Boecher +1932, Aichele und Schwegler 1957), aus botanischen +Gaerten +(Moffett 1932), aus Norwegen (Knaben und +Engelskjoen +1967), aus den Alpen (Baumberger 1970). + + +Standort +. Subalpin, selten montan und alpin. Ziemlich saure, +naehrstoffarme +, trockene, humose Boden. Weiden ( +Nardetum +auct., +Curvuletum +auct.), Zwergstrauchgesellschaften. + + +Nordeuropa +(bis 63° NB in Norwegen; kommt in +Grossbritannien +und Irland nicht vor), +nordostwaerts +bis +Suedfinnland +, in +Russland +nur an der finnischen Grenze (Jalas 1950), +Daenemark +, mitteldeutsche und +sueddeutsche +Gebirge, Norddeutschland (jedoch nicht im Baltikum und in Polen), +noerdliche +Vogesen, nordspanische Gebirge, +Pyrenaeen +, Plateau Central, Alpen (vom Monte Viso +ostwaerts +bis +Allgaeu +, +Kaernten +und Steiermark), Tatra, Karpaten (?), Gebirge von Montenegro, Serbien (?) und Bulgarien (Rilagebirge). Verbreitungskarte von Meusel (1965). - Im Gebiet nur in den Alpen; verbreitet, ziemlich +haeufig +. + + + +Bemerkungen. +P. vernalis + +ist einheitlich; nahe verwandte Art, + +P. ajanensis +Regel et Tiling + +in Ostasien. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/73/D0/3773D0B9A801CFA97C56DAD5F26C969B.xml b/data/37/73/D0/3773D0B9A801CFA97C56DAD5F26C969B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ff2ab6ee3e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/73/D0/3773D0B9A801CFA97C56DAD5F26C969B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Sawflies, ' Symphyta' + + + +Author + +Liston, Andrew D. + + + +Author + +Knight, Guy T. + + + +Author + +Sheppard, David A. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1168 +1168 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 +1314-2828-2-1168 + + + + +Empria alpina Benson, 1938 + + + + +Empria gussakovskii +Dovnar-Zapolskij, 1929: Zhelochovtsev, 1988 misident. + + + +Distribution +Scotland, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/73/F2/3773F24596A438B1CEA92DE1C8FD567C.xml b/data/37/73/F2/3773F24596A438B1CEA92DE1C8FD567C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..042b96e6d55 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/73/F2/3773F24596A438B1CEA92DE1C8FD567C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +Revision of Zelodia (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae) from Thailand + + + +Author + +Sharkey, Michael J. +Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, S 225 Agricultural Science Center North, Lexington, KY 40546 - 0091, USA + + + +Author + +Stoelb, Stephanie A. C. + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2012 + +2012-05-28 + + +26 + + +31 +71 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.26.2527 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.26.2527 +1314-2607-26-31 +BC5094526EEB4686B1772B20402C247F +8E18FFC1661CFFEFFFC6FFF9FFA4C675 +574778 + + + + +Zelodia nikomi Sharkey +sp. n. +Fig. 9 + + + +Diagnosis. +Hind femur all pale; stigma entirely melanic; MT1 long and narrow, only slightly wider apically than basally. + + +Description. + +Body length +5.5 mm. +Head. +35 flagellomeres. Median ocellus diameter narrower than space between lateral ocelli. Vertex sparsely and weakly punctate. +Mesosoma. +Notauli mostly or entirely crenulate. Metapleuron sparsely covered with setae. Fore wing cells with a yellowish hue basally, infuscate apically, veins yellow basally, melanic apically, stigma entirely melanic. Hind tarsal claw bifid. Length/width of hind femur 1.83/5.0 = 3.7. Lateral surface of hind femur aciculate. +Metasoma. +Length/width ratio of MT1, 0.95/0.585 = 1.6. Ratio of widest point of MT1 to narrowest point 0.585/0.394 = 1.5. +Color. +Mostly yellow except as melanic as follows: flagellum, lateral surface of scape, hind tarsus, apex of hind tibia. + + + +Figure 9. + +Zelodia nikomi + +sp.n. +a +lateral habitus +b +wings +c +dorsal head +d +lateral head +e +lateral mesosoma +f +dorsal mesosoma +g +dorsal propodeum and MT1-MT3. + + + + +Molecular data. +TaxaBank#/BOLD Process ID/Genbank Accession: H518/ATRMK220-11/JQ763441. + + +Distribution. +Known only from the type locality in central Thailand.Distribution map can be found at http://purl.org/thaimap/nikomi + + +Etymology. +Dedicated to Mr. Nikom Wongwan, collector at Phuka National Park. + + +Material examined. + +Holotype ♀. H0518 [QSBG], Thailand, Phu Kradueng NP, 420m, +16.844°N +, +101.692°E +, MT, 9-16.iii.2009. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/74/0A/37740A8938819F2E41EBDE0BC638A347.xml b/data/37/74/0A/37740A8938819F2E41EBDE0BC638A347.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..82f6cf8b681 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/74/0A/37740A8938819F2E41EBDE0BC638A347.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +New records of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Iran. + + + +Author + +Paknia, O. + + + +Author + +Radchenko, A. + + + +Author + +Pfeiffer, M. + +text + + +Asian Myrmecology + + +2010 + +3 + + +29 +38 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/23045/23045.pdf + +journal article +23045 + + + + +Myrmecina sp. ir-abpari-01 and ir-ghaemshahr-01 + + + + + +Material: 8 $, +Caspian Hyrcanian mixed forests, Ghaemshahr +( +36°22'16''N +, +52°50'53''E +), 155 m asl, + +4.VI.2008 + +, leg. +Omid Paknia + +; + +4?, +Caspian Hyrcanian mixed forests, Abpari +( +36°30'05''N +, +51°55'58''E +), 308 m asl, + +22.VI.2008 + +, leg. +Omid Paknia + +. + + + +Remarks: The genus Myrmecina Curtis consists of about 40 described species distributed in the Holarctic, South and Southeast Asia, Australia and South America. It is absent in the Afrotropical and Malagasy Regions. The highest speciosity occurs in the Oriental Region. In the western Palaearctic, there are four known species distributed from the Iberian Peninsula and Algeria to the Transcaucasus and the Middle East. This genus is new to Iran. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/74/87/377487908330FFBDFF20FEA2FCFDD1D5.xml b/data/37/74/87/377487908330FFBDFF20FEA2FCFDD1D5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c54d6b798a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/74/87/377487908330FFBDFF20FEA2FCFDD1D5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ + + + +An annotated list and a key to Vietnamese species of the genus Hyperxipha Maa, 1949 (Hymenoptera: Xiphydriidae) with description of a new species + + + +Author + +Pham, P. H. + + + +Author + +Nguyen, A. T. T. + + + +Author + +Nguyen, N. T. + +text + + +Far Eastern Entomologist + + +2023 + +2023-02-02 + + +470 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.25221/fee.470.1 + +journal article +10.25221/fee.470.1 +2713-2196 +7616426 + + + + + + + +Hyperxiphia varia +( +Mocsáry, 1904 +) + + + + + + + + +Xiphydria varia +Mocsáry, 1904: 497 + +. + + + + +DISTRIBUTION. +Vietnam +: +Tonkin +(currently Northern +Vietnam +) ( +Mocsáry, 1904 +; +Maa, 1949 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/74/87/377487908331FFBAFF20FECEFEDAD211.xml b/data/37/74/87/377487908331FFBAFF20FECEFEDAD211.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..16cbac655c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/74/87/377487908331FFBAFF20FECEFEDAD211.xml @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ + + + +An annotated list and a key to Vietnamese species of the genus Hyperxipha Maa, 1949 (Hymenoptera: Xiphydriidae) with description of a new species + + + +Author + +Pham, P. H. + + + +Author + +Nguyen, A. T. T. + + + +Author + +Nguyen, N. T. + +text + + +Far Eastern Entomologist + + +2023 + +2023-02-02 + + +470 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.25221/fee.470.1 + +journal article +10.25221/fee.470.1 +2713-2196 +7616426 + + + + + + + +Hyperxiphia punctata +Pham + +, +sp. n. + + + + +https://zoobank.org/NomenclaturalActs/ +9C516B82-9758-4510-9E13-EB02ECAA288F + + + + +Figs 1–12 + + + + + +MATERIAL. +Holotype +: +♀ +, + +Vietnam + +: +Cao Bang +, +Ha Quang +, +Ngoc Dong +, + + +22°46′23″ N +, +105°58′29″ E +, + +312 m + +, + +23. +V + + + +2022, coll. +Phong Huy Pham +( +IEBR +) + +. + + + +DIAGNOSIS. Antenna black, 18-segmented; vertex with distinct, longitudinal carinae medially behind hind ocelli; eyes moderately diverging below; mesopleuron with dense, coarse, large punctures, interspace much smaller than puncture diameter; mesonotum rugoreticulate, black with axillae and metanotum yellowish white; wings hyaline, forewing darkly infuscated subapically; abdominal segments 1–5 reddish brown; abdominal tergites 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 with yellowish white spots laterally; sheath long, about 3.1 × longer than broad, black except reddish brown at base. + + + +DESCRIPTION. Female. Body length +16 mm +(measured from the head to the apex of the last abdominal segment), forewing length +11 mm +. + + +Colour. Antenna black ( +Figs 1–4 +). Head black except base of mandible, orbits (except upper area), area below antennae, antennal socket, and large band on gena extending to occipital carina near middle area, labial palpus and maxillary palpus (except apical palpomere brown) yellow ( +Figs 1–4 +). Thorax black with following yellowish white parts: pronotum except middle area and lateral spots; axillae, upper area of mesopleuron, tegula, metanotum ( +Figs 5–8 +), coxae, trochanters, tibiae, basitarsi ( +Figs 11, 12 +). Abdomen with segments 1-5 reddish brown, 6 reddish brown except black at apical area, 7 and 8 black, 9 black except yellowish white at apical area, 10 yellowish white; abdominal tergites 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 with yellowish white spots laterally, that on 6 extending to near middle area ( +Figs 10–12 +); sheath black with base reddish brown ( +Figs 11, 12 +). Wings hyaline, veins and stigma black, forewing darkly infuscated subapically ( +Fig. 9 +). + + +Head ( +Figs 1–4 +). Round in frontal view ( +Fig. 1 +); mandible with four teeth, apical tooth largest ( +Fig. 1 +); labial palpus with 4 palpomeres, first palpomere as long as remaining palpomeres combined; maxillary palpus with 4 palpomeres, its length about 2 × that of labial palpus; antenna 18-segmented, first segment longest, with fine punctures; first and second segments shiny, with sparse, short setae; remaining segments covered with dense setae; relative lengths of antennal segments 1: 2: 3: 4 = 30: 16: 22: 12; frons with longitudinal carinae from level of hind ocelli through supraclypeal area ( +Figs 1, 4 +); eyes moderately diverging below, upper interocular distance equal to eye height ( +Fig. 1 +); vertex sparsely, finely punctate, with longitudinal median carinae behind hind ocelli ( +Figs 2, 4 +); gena with distinct carina ( +Fig. 3 +). + + +Thorax ( +Figs 5–9, 12 +). Propleuron shiny, with sparse punctures mostly laterally; pronotum shiny, medial length of pronotum much shorter than depth of excavation of pronotal collar in front ( +Fig. 5 +), with diagonal area of short carinae at center. Mesoscutum conspicuously rugoreticulate, with dense, coarse punctures except lateral sides, interspaces much smaller than puncture diameters ( +Fig. 6 +); mesoscutellum rugose, shiny, impunctate apically; mesopleuron shiny, with dense, coarse, large punctures, interspaces much smaller than puncture diameters ( +Figs 7, 8 +); mesosternum shiny, without punctures; metanotum rugose ( +Fig. 6 +); metapleuron densely punctate ( +Fig. +7); fore basitarsus equal to remaining tarsomeres combined, hind basitarsus slightly shorter than remaining tarsomeres combined ( +Fig. 12 +); all tarsal claws with inner tooth ( +Fig. 12 +). Wings hyaline, veins black; forewing darkly infuscated subapically, with costal cell narrow, slightly wider than costa ( +Fig. 9 +). + + +Abdomen ( +Figs 10–12 +). Shiny; covered with sparse brownish setae; abdominal tergites 1–5 slightly rugose subapically, with dense, fine punctures; 7 impunctate; 8 with large punctures medially, interspaces equal to puncture diameters; 9 with a few punctures; 10 with long setae apically ( +Fig. 10 +); sheath stout and long, near straight in lateral view, about 3.1 × longer than broad, about 0.9 × length of basal plates ( +Figs 11–12 +). + + + +Figs 7–12. + +Hyperxiphia punctata +Pham + +, +sp. n +, holotype ♀. 7 – thorax, lateral view; 8 – mesopleuron; 9 – forewing; 10 – abdomen, dorsal view; 11 – abdomen, lateral view; 12 – habitus, lateral view. + + +Male. Unknown. + + + +DISTRIBUTION. +Vietnam +: +Cao Bang +. + + + +ETYMOLOGY. The name of species comes from punctured mesopleuron. + + + +REMARKS. Maculae of the new species are rather similar to those of +H. semilutea +Smith, 2020 +described from +Laos +( +Smith, 2020 +), but they are different in the colour and shape. In + +H. punctata + +, yellow maculae on the vertex are angulate-shaped after the ocelli and triangle-shaped at the occipital carina (in +H. semilutea +they are truncated and L-shaped) and maculae on the thorax and the abdomen are yellowish white (in +H. semilutea +they are white). However, the new species is easily distinguished from the latter by characters as showed in +Table 1 +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/74/87/377487908333FFBDFF20F9C8FCFCD11A.xml b/data/37/74/87/377487908333FFBDFF20F9C8FCFCD11A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..356b1dc48f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/74/87/377487908333FFBDFF20F9C8FCFCD11A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ + + + +An annotated list and a key to Vietnamese species of the genus Hyperxipha Maa, 1949 (Hymenoptera: Xiphydriidae) with description of a new species + + + +Author + +Pham, P. H. + + + +Author + +Nguyen, A. T. T. + + + +Author + +Nguyen, N. T. + +text + + +Far Eastern Entomologist + + +2023 + +2023-02-02 + + +470 + + +1 +7 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.25221/fee.470.1 + +journal article +10.25221/fee.470.1 +2713-2196 +7616426 + + + + + + + +Hyperxiphia melanaria +( +Mocsáry, 1904 +) + + + + + + + + +Xiphydria melanaria +Mocsáry, 1904: 497 + +. + + + + +DISTRIBUTION. +Vietnam +: +Tonkin +(currently Northern +Vietnam +) ( +Mocsáry, 1904 +; +Maa, 1949 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/74/BE/3774BE1E128547A36583826D232979C9.xml b/data/37/74/BE/3774BE1E128547A36583826D232979C9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2ac1a8b5719 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/74/BE/3774BE1E128547A36583826D232979C9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,281 @@ + + + +Systematics of treefrogs of the Hypsiboas calcaratus and Hypsiboas fasciatus species complex (Anura, Hylidae) with the description of four new species + + + +Author + +Caminer, Marcel A. + + + +Author + +Ron, Santiago R. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2014 + +370 + + +1 +68 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.370.6291 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.370.6291 +1313-2970-370-1 +/1CAC7714D90548F1873A997D4109A590 + + + + +Hypsiboas calcaratus (Troschel, 1848) + + + + +Hyla calcarata +Troschel, 1848: 660. Type material not designated and likely lost. Type locality +"Britisch-Guiana" +(= Guyana; +Frost 2013 +). + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Hypsiboas +calcaratus + +(Figs 4C, 8C, and 9) is characterized by: (1) mean SVL 36.82 mm in males (range 27.61-42.50; n = 36), 50.92 mm in females (range 45.94-56.29; n = 4); (2) basal webbing on the fingers; (3) calcar large and triangular; (4) dorsal background color ranging from reddish brown to cream, pinkish white or grayish brown, in most cases dark marks are present (e.g., broad transversal marks, large black stains); (5) often middorsal dark brown line present; (6) flanks pale cream or gray (in life, blue in large females and light blue or white in males) with dark brown vertical bars; (7) hidden surfaces of thighs pale cream or gray (in life, blue in large females and light blue or white in males) with dark brown transversal bars; (8) ventral surfaces of thighs creamy white, yellowish white or brown; (9) venter creamy white or yellowish white; (10) webbing on feet; (11) in life, iris creamy silver or bronze with upper yellow to orange band; (12) prepollical spine present in males. + + + +Hypsiboas +calcaratus + +is most similar to +Hypsiboas fasciatus +and +Hypsiboas almendarizae +sp. n. It differs from both species by the shape of the calcar (large and triangular in +Hypsiboas calcaratus +, small and conical in +Hypsiboas fasciatus +, and large and conical in +Hypsiboas almendarizae +sp. n.; Fig. 14 +C-D +) and by the number of notes in the advisement call (Fig. 12). +Hypsiboas calcaratus +can be further distinguished from +Hypsiboas fasciatus +by the color of the upper band in the iris: red to reddish brown in +Hypsiboas fasciatus +, yellow to orange in +Hypsiboas calcaratus +. +Hypsiboas almendarizae +sp. n. differs from +Hypsiboas calcaratus +in having narrower transversal dark bars on the flanks and thighs (mean width of bars on thighs = 5.05% of femur length, SD = 0.61, in +Hypsiboas almendarizae +sp. n. vs. 7.89%, SD = 1.2, in +Hypsiboas calcaratus +; differences are significant: t = -6.72, df = 18, P <0.001) and smaller calcars. + + + +Hypsiboas +calcaratus + +differs from +Hypsiboas maculateralis +sp. n. in advertisement call (lower dominant frequency, higher fundamental frequency; Figs 12 +E-F +and 13 +A-B +) and by the presence of transversal bars on the flanks and hidden surfaces of the thighs (dark blotches instead of bars in +Hypsiboas maculateralis +sp. n.) +Hypsiboas calcaratus +can be distinguished from +Hypsiboas alfaroi +sp. n. and +Hypsiboas tetete +sp. n. by the presence of a calcar (instead of a small tubercle on the heel) and by the absence of dark flecks on the gular region and chest (present in +Hypsiboas alfaroi +sp. n. and +Hypsiboas tetete +. sp. n.) Morphological characters useful to differentiate +Hypsiboas calcaratus +from other species are shown in Table 6. + + + +Table 6. Diagnostic characters of male specimens of the +Hypsiboas calcaratus +species complex. Coloration corresponds to preserved specimens unless otherwise noted. + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Characters +Hypsiboas alfaroi + +Hypsiboas almendarizae + +Hypsiboas calcaratus + +Hypsiboas fasciatus + +Hypsiboas maculateralis + +Hypsiboas tetete +
+ + + +Variation. +Variation in dorsal and ventral coloration of preserved specimens is shown in Figure 9. Background dorsal coloration varies from cream (e.g., QCAZ 40085) to pinkish white (e.g., QCAZ 44530), reddish brown (e.g., QCAZ 14957, 43256, 44422), pale reddish brown (e.g., QCAZ 43259) or pale grayish brown (e.g., QCAZ 48718). Irregular dorsal marks may be present in diverse patterns. A dark middorsal line extends from the tip of the snout to the mid-sacrum (e.g., QCAZ 43256), but in some specimens it only extends along the head (e.g., QCAZ 25514) or on the anterior half of the body (e.g., QCAZ 43131). There is variation in the number, size, and shape of dorsal marks. Some individuals (e.g., QCAZ 43256) have five to seven brown diffuse transversal bands (sometimes interconnected). Brown transversal bars are present on the dorsal surfaces of the limbs (one or two on the upper arm and forearm and three to five on the thigh, shank, and foot). In some individuals, the dorsum and dorsal surfaces of the forearms and shanks have large black stains (e.g., QCAZ 14957) or scattered brown or white dots (e.g., QCAZ 40085, 44178, 14971). The coloration of flanks and hidden surfaces of thighs vary from pale cream to creamy white or light gray, with dark brown transversal bars. The number of bars on the flank varies from 4 to 13; the number of bars on the thigh varies from 4 to 9. The extent of the area with bars varies from the groin to the mid flank (e.g., QCAZ 43259) to from the groin to the axilla (e.g., QCAZ 43256). In some individuals, the bars can also be present on the hidden surfaces of the shanks, ventral surfaces of the forelimbs, and dorsal surfaces of the feet (e.g., QCAZ 43256). + +Ventral +surfaces of preserved specimens vary from creamy white (e.g., QCAZ 44530) to yellowish white (e.g., QCAZ 43256). In some individuals, scattered minute pale brown blotches are present on the lips (e.g., QCAZ 31446, 44178). Coloration of webbing and discs vary from yellowish white to brown or gray. Coloration of bones is white or green. + + + +Coloration in life. + +(based on photographs; Figs 4C and 8C). Dorsal surfaces vary from light brown (e.g., QCAZ 40056) to reddish brown (e.g., QCAZ 36869) or brown (e.g., QCAZ 24282) with a middorsal dark brown line (e.g., QCAZ 40985); some individuals have brown diffuse transversal bands (e.g., QCAZ 43256); the dorsal surfaces of the limbs have pale brown transversal bars (e.g., QCAZ 43256); scattered +minute +white and black dots can be present on the dorsum (e.g., QCAZ 40056); in some individuals there are large dark brown blotches on the dorsum, dorsal surfaces of the forearms and shanks (e.g., QCAZ 43245); flanks are white, light blue or blue with +dark +brown vertical bars (e.g., QCAZ 40083); hidden surfaces of thighs and shanks are white, light blue or blue with dark brown transversal bars (e.g., QCAZ 43034); in some specimens there are dark brown transversal bars on the hidden surfaces of the shanks, ventral surfaces of the upper arms, and dorsal surfaces of the feet (e.g., QCAZ 43034); a faint creamy white stripe usually is evident on the outer edge of the feet, tarsus, forearms, and hands (e.g., QCAZ 26062); venter creamy white with belly yellowish white; ventral surfaces of hindlimbs and forelimbs translucent white (e.g., QCAZ 43824) or yellowish (e.g., QCAZ 40085); in some individuals, ventral surfaces of the thighs are creamy white (e.g., QCAZ 43047); discs and webbing yellowish (e.g., QCAZ 40085) or brown (e.g., QCAZ 40985); iris creamy silver (e.g., QCAZ 40056) or bronze (e.g., QCAZ 40085) with an upper yellow to orange band (e.g., QCAZ 43047); bones are white (e.g., QCAZ 40083) or green (e.g., QCAZ 43824). + +In the examined adult series, the largest male has a SVL of 42.50 mm, and the largest female 56.29 mm; mean male SVL = 37.08 mm (n = 35; SD = 2.09), mean female SVL = 50.92 mm (n = 4; SD = 4.80). Females are significantly larger than males (t = -5.71, df = 3, P = 0.009). Inter-population variation in size and other morphometric variables is shown in Tables 1 and 2. + + +Advertisement call. + +Two males were recorded at Tena (Provincia Napo) on 1 March 2009 and five males at +Estacion +Cientifica +Yasuni +PUCE (Provincia Orellana) on 20 June 2009, in vegetation next to streams or ponds. Acoustic parameters of the advertisement call are shown in Table 7. The call (Fig. 12 +E-F +) consists of a single quack note with a mean duration of 0.05 s (SD = 0.00) and mean rise time of 0.04 s (SD = 0.01). The mean dominant frequency is 1780.50 Hz (SD = 112.73) and the mean fundamental frequency is 557.13 Hz (SD = 46.21). + + + +Table 7. Descriptive statistics for call parameters of +Hypsiboas alfaroi +(QCAZ 43260-63), +Hypsiboas almendarizae +(QCAZ 39645, 39647-50), +Hypsiboas calcaratus +(QCAZ 40084-85, 43247, 43256-59), +Hypsiboas fasciatus +(QCAZ 48583-86, 48633), +Hypsiboas maculateralis +(QCAZ 40082), and +Hypsiboas tetete +(QCAZ 40060, 40080-81, 48095). The n values indicate the number of males analyzed. Mean ++/- +SD is given with range in parentheses. Values for +Hypsiboas maculateralis +were obtained from three calls from a single male. See Table 3 for a description of each parameter. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Hypsiboas alfaroi +(n = 4) + +Hypsiboas almendarizi +(n = 5) + +Hypsiboas calcaratus +(n = 7) + +Hypsiboas fasciatus +(n = 5) + +Hypsiboas maculateralis +(n = 1) + +Hypsiboas tetete +(n = 4) +
Type 1Type 2
+ + + +Distribution and ecology. + +Hypsiboas calcaratus +has confirmed records (based on DNA sequences and specimens listed in Appendix) from French Guiana, Guyana and the Amazon basin of Brazil, Ecuador, and Peru (Fig. 17). A photograph published by +De la Riva et al. (2000) +confirms its presence in Bolivia. Records from Colombia and Venezuela need confirmation. Known localities range in elevation from sea level (Kaw) to 650 m (Canelos). + + +Hypsiboas calcaratus +occurs in Terra Firme forest, flooded forests ( +Varzea +and +Igapo +), and swamps. It is generally found next to streams, ponds, and lakes. Individuals have been recorded at night perching on vegetation 15 to 200 cm above the ground. Their occurrence in secondary forests and artificial open areas suggest at least some tolerance of anthropogenic habitat disturbance. + + +Vegetation types at known localities include Southwest Amazon Moist Forest and Napo Moist Forest for the Peruvian and Ecuadorian localities, Guianan Moist Forest for the Guyana and French Guiana localities, and +Madeira-Tapajos +Moist Forest for the Brazilian locality (according to the World Wildlife Fund, 2012). + + + +Conservation status. + +Its distribution polygon has 3'586,597 km2 and overlaps with protected areas and large regions of pristine forest. +Hypsiboas calcaratus +is relatively frequent in scientific collections suggesting that, at least in part of its range, it is not a rare species. For these reasons we propose assigning +Hypsiboas calcaratus +to the Red List category of Least Concern. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/75/62/3775628806DE5B72126A0D8D1EB0E449.xml b/data/37/75/62/3775628806DE5B72126A0D8D1EB0E449.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..af87cca1ab3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/75/62/3775628806DE5B72126A0D8D1EB0E449.xml @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Salicornia arabica +, +spec. nov. + + + +2. Salicornia articulis obtusis basi incrassatis, spicis ovatis. + +Kali +geniculatum majus. +Bauh. pin. 289. Moris. hist.2. p.610. s.5. t.33. f.7. Raj. hist. 211. + + + + +Habitat in +Arabia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/75/E0/3775E0BB10575073A48773BC80533EA0.xml b/data/37/75/E0/3775E0BB10575073A48773BC80533EA0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..51019ae1fa0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/75/E0/3775E0BB10575073A48773BC80533EA0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Aquatic beetle diversity from Volcan Tacana, Mexico: altitudinal distribution pattern and biogeographical affinity of the fauna + + + +Author + +Luna-Luna, Alba Magali +Doctorado en Ciencias Biologicas y de la Salud, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, Mexico City, Mexico + + + +Author + +Martins, Caleb Califre +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5630-9865 +Postdoctoral fellow, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico + + + +Author + +Lopez-Perez, Andres +Postdoctoral fellow, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico + + + +Author + +Ramirez-Ponce, Andres +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4742-7397 +Laboratorio de Ecosistemas Costeros, Departamento de Hidrobiologia, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico + + + +Author + +Contreras-Ramos, Atilano +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8044-1348 +Red de Biodiversidad y Sistematica, Instituto de Ecologia, A. C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico +acontreras@ib.unam.mx + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2022 + +2022-07-11 + + +1111 + + +301 +338 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1111.68665 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1111.68665 +1313-2970-1111-301 +8EDF5CD7B0104B6DB90F0A6A1200C768 +B17D24BEF89E503B813D064FB1E7AA5C + + + + +Microcylloepus troilus Hinton, 1940 + + + +Distribution. + +Mexico (Chiapas, Estado de Mexico). Previous altitudinal records of + +M. +Microcylloepus troilus + +are from 1,707 to 2,286 m ( +Hinton 1940b +). In this study, + +M. +Microcylloepus troilus + +was found at all sampled levels (670-1,776 m). + + + +Comments. +Collected on substrates of gravel, macrophytes, and leaf packs, throughout sampling months (February 2018 through February 2019, dry and rainy season). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/76/FF/3776FFB90C7B5C4BF6B1AF076132EF4A.xml b/data/37/76/FF/3776FFB90C7B5C4BF6B1AF076132EF4A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..07bc2651420 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/76/FF/3776FFB90C7B5C4BF6B1AF076132EF4A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +New Coleoptera records from New Brunswick, Canada: Anthribidae, Brentidae, Dryophthoridae, Brachyceridae, and Curculionidae, with additions to the fauna of Quebec, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island + + + +Author + +Webster, Reginald P. + + + +Author + +Anderson, Robert S. + + + +Author + +Sweeney, Jon D. + + + +Author + +DeMerchant, Ian + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +179 + + +349 +406 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.179.2626 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.179.2626 +1313-2970-179-349 + + + + +Listronotus deceptus (Blatchley, 1916)** +Map 39 + + + +Material examined. + +New Brunswick, Gloucester Co., Caraquet, near the Acadian Historical Village, +47.7887°N +, +65.0756°W +, 29.VI.2007, R. P. Webster, inland margin of salt marsh, sweeping (4, RWC). + + + +Map 39. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of +Listronotus deceptus +. + + + + +Collection and habitat data. +Little is known about the habitat associations or biology of this species. Adults from New Brunswick were swept from foliage on the inland margin of a salt marsh during late June. + + +Distribution in Canada and Alaska. + +QC, NB ( + +O'Brien +1997 + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC1E940DA52F588FAFEF30E.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC1E940DA52F588FAFEF30E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..851a76818dd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC1E940DA52F588FAFEF30E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,327 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes fasciatus +Rahayu & Forest, 1995 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 8B +) + + + + + + + +Diogenes fasciatus +Rahayu & Forest, 1995: 388 + + +, fig. 1 ( +type +locality: Muara Karang, +Jakarta +Bay, +Indonesia +); + +Rahayu, 1996: 340 + +; + +Siddiqui, Kazmi & McLaughlin, 2004: 185 + +, fig. 13. + + + + + +Material examined. +96 males +, +0.7–2.9 mm +, + +5 females +, +1.8–2.5 mm +, 20 ovigerous females, +1.8–2.5 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0130 +), +Changi +, + +18 January 1995 + + +; +20 males +, +2.4–4.2 mm +, + +12 females +, +1.6–2.4 mm +, 20 ovigerous females, +1.6–2.9 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0131 +), +Changi +, + +16 February 1995 + + +; + +8 males +, +2.3‒5.3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0132 +), DW58, +East of Pulau Tekong +, +01°25.064′N +104°04.992′E +, + +10.9–11.3 m + +, + +22 October 2012 + + +; +15 males +, +1.6–2.2 mm +, + +4 females +, 1.6–2.0 mm, 5 ovigerous females, 1.8–2.0 mm ( +ZRC 2021.0133 +), +Chek Jawa +, + +21 September 2001 + + +; + +1 male +, 1.0 mm ( +ZRC 2021.0134 +), +Pulau Hantu +, + +7–10 m + +, + +16 December 2012 + + +; + +1 male +, +3.9 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0135 +), st. M24, +Pulau Ketam +, + +8 March 2012 + + +; + +1 ovigerous female, +4.5 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0136 +), st. M13, +Pulau Ubin +, + +7 March 2012 + + +; + +7 males +, 4.5–6.0 mm ( +ZRC 2021.0137 +), +Changi +, beach seine, + +16 July 1993 + + +; +3 males +, +3.1–4.2 mm +, + +3 females +, +2.5–3.5 mm +, +Perak +, +Malaysia + +. + + +Colour in life. +Shield mottled with dark grey and light brown. Ocular peduncle white with greyish brown blotch on dorsomesial face distally, light brown patch proximally. Antennular peduncle generally greyish brown, with dark brown band on distal margin of ultimate and penultimate segments, flagella white; first to fourth segments and antennal acicle of antennal peduncle greyish brown, fifth segment and flagella white. Chelipeds palm whitish grey; dactyl and fixed finger with tint of light brown, carpi and meri dark brown or dark grey. P2 and P3 dark brown or dark grey, lighter grey dorsally and ventrally on propodi and carpi, with white spot on articulation dactyl, propodus and carpus ( +Fig. 8B +). + +The general colouration in life varies from yellowish light brown to dark brown or dark grey, but the pattern is the same. + + + +Distribution. +Pakistan +, +Singapore +, +Malaysia +, and +Indonesia +; +0–7 m +, inhabit sandy, muddy substrate. + + + + +Remarks. +Among the species in the + +edwardsii + +group, this species is readily recognised by an ensemble of characters as follows: antennal peduncles stout, flagellum with abundant setae; left cheliped dactyl broad, flattened, covered with small tubercls; fixed finger outer surface tuberculate and devoid of longitudinal ridge; and palm with row of strong spines on upper and lower margins, at proximoventral angle row of strong spines parallel to carpal articulation, reaching to distal quarter, then continued as longitudinal row/rows of small spines on outer surface. The differences between + +D. fasciatus + +, + +D. avarus +Heller, 1865 + +, and + +D. investigatoris +Alcock, 1905b + +were already discussed by +Rahayu & Forest (1995) +, and the significance of those characters has been confirmed. The flattened dactyl of the left cheliped and the presence of a row or rows of spines on the propodi of P2 and P3 placed + +D. fasciatus + +close to + +D. lophochir +Morgan, 1989 + +. But these two species differ in the presence of pronounced ridge on the fixed finger of the left cheliped in + +D. lopochir + +(absence in + +D. fasciatus + +), the tuberculate crest on the outer face of the palm of the left cheliped is positioned in the midline in + +D. lophochir + +while in + +D. fasciatus + +this crest is located adjacent to upper margin. + + +Rahayu & Forest (1995) +did not mention the presence of row of spines on the dorsal margin of the propodi of P2 and P3 but indicated that the spines on the carpi are present only in the large individual. +Siddiqui et al. (2004) +stated that these spines are present or absent in their material and that the specimens from +Pakistan +have one or two rows of spines on carpi, while +Asakura (2020) +stated that, in the material from +Singapore +and +Thailand +, the dorsal margins of propodi of ambulatory legs have a row of spines, and also figured the spines on the dorsal margin of carpi ( +Asakura, 2020 +: fig. 11A, C, E). In some specimens in this study, the propodi and carpi of P2 and P3 have one or two rows of spines on the dorsal margin. Additionally, a tiny spine on the dorsodistal margin of the fourth segment of the antennal peduncles was also detected in some individuals. The spines on the mesial margin of the antennal acicle varies from very prominent to moderately large, and one additional spine is sometimes present at the midlength of the lateral margin. The same character was also observed by +Asakura (2020) +in his specimens. Further study is necessary to confirm that these characters mentioned above are merely attributed to intraspecific variations or interspecific differences. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC2E940DAA0F008FB2FF514.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC2E940DAA0F008FB2FF514.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c33cfb74e01 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC2E940DAA0F008FB2FF514.xml @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes inglei +McLaughlin & Clark, 1997 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 9A, B +) + + + + + + + +Diogenes inglei + +McLaughlin & Clark, 1997: 34 + + + +, figs. 1, 2 ( +type +locality: +Blakang Mati +, +Singapore +). + + + + + +Material examined. + +1 male +, +1.1 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0197 +), st. DR87, +Outside Tanjong Rhu +, +1°16.899′N +103°53.825′E +, sand, mud, + +19.5–20.7 m + +, + +4 November 2012 + + +; + +1 female +, +1.6 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0198 +), st. TB5, beside +Sebarok +, +1°10.5′N +103°46.512′E +, rocky bottom, + +63.8–64.1 m + +, + +20 May 2014 + + +; + +1 ovigerous female, +2.4 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0199 +), st. DR208, +East of Semakau +, +South of Sebarok +, +1°11.149′N +103°47.702′E +, rock, barrel sponge, + +17.4–24.7 m + +, + +24 September 2013 + + +; + +1 female +, +1.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0200 +), no locality + +; + +1 male +, +1.1 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0201 +), 2 ovigerous females, +1.3–1.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0201 +), st. TB113, +South of Sisters’ +Island +, +1°12.001′N +103°50.261′E +, rocky bottom, + +29.3–30.5 m + +, + +29 May 2013 + + +; + +1 female +, +1.6 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0202 +), st. DR174, near +Kusu Island +, +1°12.202′N +103°52.178′E +, red clay, dead shell, + +79.6–135 m + +, + +4 June 2013 + + +. + + +Colour in life. +Shield mottled with cream and light brown, with two brown spots proximally; ocular peduncle cream with red longitudinal stripes on dorsal and mesial faces; chelipeds mottled with cream and light brown, dactyl and fixed finger greenish brown; P2 and P3 cream, almost transparent, with greenish brown broad band, proximally on dactyls and carpi, subdistally and proximally on propodi, and medially and proximally on meri ( +Fig. 9A, B +). + + + + +Distribution. +At present known only from +Singapore +; +17–135 m +, on rocky substrate. + + + + +Remarks. +This is the first record of the species after its description and also the first discovery of male specimens. The species is very characteristic in having tapering corneas, short antennal acicles, and subequal posterior lobes of the telson. +McLaughlin & Clark (1997) +described this species on the basis of +four female +specimens collected in +Singapore +in 1899. The female specimens examined in this study agree with the female +type +series. The male specimens differ from female specimens in its unarmed pleomere 6 (armed with a spine in female specimens, including the +type +specimens). The male pleopods are uniramous, typical of + +Diogenes + +. One specimen was found occupying the hole of a polychaete attached to a large rock ( +Fig. 9A +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC2E941DAB5F602FE35F1CE.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC2E941DAB5F602FE35F1CE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c0c531915dd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC2E941DAB5F602FE35F1CE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,186 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes klaasi +Rahayu & Forest, 1995 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 8C +) + + + + + + + +Diogenes klaasi +Rahayu & Forest, 1995: 395 + + +, fig. 3 ( +type +locality: Balikpapan, +Kalimantan +, +Indonesia +); + +McLaughlin, 2002a: 419 + +, fig. 3D−F; + +Siddiqui et al., 2004: 187 + +, fig. 14; Rahayu, 2015: 183, figs. 1, 7A. + + + + + +Material examined. +2 males +, +1.5–2.2 mm +, + +1 female +, +1.8 mm +, 2 ovigerous females, +2.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0151 +), SW53, +Seringat Kias +, artificial lagoon, +1°13.630′N +103°51.218′E +, hand collecting, sandy beach, seagrass, + +24 May 2013 + + +; + +1 male +, +2.5 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0152 +), MF63, +Pulau Senang +, +01°10.469′N +103°44.183′E +, mudflat, + +30 June 2012 + + +; + +2 males +, +1.8–2 mm +( +MZB +Cru +5203), st. SW155, north lagoon +St John’s Island +, +1°13.116′N +103°51.079′S +, + +3 June 2013 + + +; + +1 male +, +2.4 mm +( +ZRC 1994.4412 +), +Kallang +basin, + +15 December 1994 + + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Persian Gulf, +Pakistan +, western +Thailand +, +Singapore +, +Indonesia +; intertidal, on rocky or sandy-muddy beach. + + + + +Remarks. +Rahayu (2015) gave a short diagnosis and a description of the living colouration of this species. + +Diogenes klaasi + +is readily recognised by the presence of strong spines on the ventrolateral margin of the merus of the left cheliped which extends to the ventral surface and ventromesial margin. In life, the presence of fine brown oblique stripes on the ocular peduncle, which extends from the proximolateral and proximomesial angle towards the base of the cornea, and with slightly broader longitudinal stripe medially, and also the two black or dark brown spots on the shield, are characteristic to the species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC3E95ED9CDF2C8FD96F423.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC3E95ED9CDF2C8FD96F423.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9564443e365 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC3E95ED9CDF2C8FD96F423.xml @@ -0,0 +1,404 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes laevicarpus +Rahayu, 1996 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 8D +) + + + + + + + +Diogenes laevicarpus +Rahayu, 1996: 341 + + +, fig. 1 ( +type +locality: +Singapore +); + +McLaughlin et al., 2010: 21 + +(list). + + + + + +Material examined. + +1 female +, +4.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0138 +), st. M18, +End of Jalan Durian +, + +7 March 2012 + + +; + +1 male +, +5.1 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0139 +), st. DW17, +Pulau Ubin +, + +12 October 2012 + + +; + +1 male +, +2.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0140 +), st. MF58, +Pasir Ris +01°22.955′N +103°57.130′E +, + +11 May 2012 + + +; + +2 females +, 2.0 mm, +2.7 mm +, 2 ovigerous females, +3.6 mm +, +2.5 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0141 +), st. DW36, +Pulau Serangoon +, +1°24.545′N +103°55.992′E +, + +16–18.6 m + +, + +19 October 2012 + + +; + +2 males +, +3.2 mm +, +3.5 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0142 +), +Changi +, + +16 February 1995 + + +; + +1 female +, +3.1 mm +( +ZRC 1994.4412 +), +Kallang +basin, + +15 December 1994 + + +; + +4 males +, +2.4–3.3 mm +, 2 ovigerous females, +2.5 mm +, +2.7 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0144 +), +Singapore +Strait +, + +June 2013 + + +; +2 males +, 2.00 mm, +2.7 mm +, + +1 female +, +2 mm +, 1 ovigerous female, +3.1 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0145 +), st. D07, +Pulau Ubin +, + +6 March 2012 + + +; + +1 male +, +6.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0146 +), st. MF48, +Sarimbun Beach +, +01°26.279′N +103°41.915′S +, + +14 February 2012 + + +; +23 males +, 1.8–6.0 mm, + +8 females +, +1.8–3.3 mm +, 12 ovigerous females, +2.4–4.4 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0148 +), +Chek Jawa +, + +1 July 2009 + + +; + +3 males +, +3.1–4.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0149 +), st. DW58, +East Pulau Tekong +, +01°25.064′N +104°04.992′E +, + +10.9–11.3 m + +, + +22 October 2012 + + +; +1 male +, +4.7 mm +, + +5 females +, +1.6‒3.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0150 +), +Red Cliff +shoal area, +Changi +, + +16 November 2008 + + +; + +1 male +, +5.3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0147 +), st. DW40, +Opposite Changi Chalet Radar +, +01°23.797′N +103°58.751′E +, + +19 October 2012 + + +; + +1 female +, +1.8 mm +, 1 ovigerous female, +2.5 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0143 +) + +. + + +Colour in life. +Shield light brown, mottled with dark brown and bluish white; ocular peduncles generally tan with tinge of light brown distally, dark brown proximally; antennular peduncles transparent with dark brown spot proximally on dorsal surface of ultimate and penultimate segments; antennal peduncles light brown or tan with dark brown streak on second segment. Chelipeds mottled with tan and white, dark brown blotch on carpus and merus. P2 and P3 generally light brown, dactyls reddish brown, propodi with dark brown transverse band medially, longitudinal dark brown stripe ventromesially; carpi and meri with two large greenish brown longitudinal stripes on lateral face, dorsal face with large brown marking ( +Fig. 8D +). + + + + +Distribution. +Singapore +, intertidal, on sandy muddy substrate. + + + + +Remarks. +The specific characteristics of this species include: shield as long as broad, antennular peduncles slightly overreach antennal peduncles; outer surface of the left cheliped dactyl with broad longitudinal sulcus flanked by row(s) of tubercles; outer suface of left cheliped palm with spinous or drop-like tubercles crest extending from proximoventral angle, parallel with carpal articulation then curving distally along midline, reaching only to proximal 0.2, crest terminating abruptly, replaced by rows of small flattened tubercles, continued to almost reaching articulation with dactyl; longitudinal row of small spines or tubercles on outer surface of left cheliped palm between median row of tubercles and upper margin of palm; lower margin of left cheliped palm with row of tubercles; convex fixed finger of left chela covered by spines/tubercles that form broad longitudinal ridge. + + + +Diogenes laevicarpus + +was described from +two specimens +with +2 mm +shield length. Examination of +76 specimens +in this study showed morphological variation on the armature of the ambulatory legs that related to the size of the animal. In the small specimens (sl ≤ +2.5 mm +), the dorsal margin of each carpus of P2 is armed with a row of spinules and sometimes spinules are also detected on the propodus, while in P3 the propodi are usually unarmed and the carpi each bear a dorsodistal spine. In the larger specimens (sl> +2.5 mm +), the dorsal margins of propodi and carpi of P2 and P3 bear a row or rows of spines, although the spines are smaller on P3. + + +The differences of this species with + +D. lophochir + +and + +D. costatus + +discussed by +Rahayu (1996) +were only on the proportion of the antennal and antennular peduncles against the ocular peduncles, and the presence of row of spines on the dorsal margins of the propodus and carpus of the ambulatory legs. As mentioned earlier, the presence of row of tubercles on the dorsal margin of the propodus and carpus of the ambulatory legs in this species is variable, therefore this character cannot be used to distinguish these three species. Although +McLaughlin (2002b +, 2005) showed that the proportion of antennal and antennular peduncles against ocular peduncles is variable and unreliable to separate the species in the genus + +Diogenes + +, this proportion is constant in all sizes of + +D. laevicarpus + +. Other left cheliped characters of + +D. costatus + +and + +D. lophochir + +that separate them from + +D. laevicarpus + +are as follows: dactyl without longitudinal sulcus; outer surface of palm without row of spines between medial crest and upper margin; fixed finger deflexed, without longitudinal ridge in + +D. costatus + +, with pronounced, narrow longitudinal ridge in + +D. lophochir + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC4E945D9F2F7CFFE7CF78E.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC4E945D9F2F7CFFE7CF78E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..91b758ebddf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC4E945D9F2F7CFFE7CF78E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,544 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes platyops +Rahayu & Forest, 1995 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 5D–F +, +6B +, +7C, D +) + + + + + + + +Diogenes platyops +Rahayu & Forest, 1995: 399 + + +, fig. 4a–h ( +type +locality: Pari Island, +Jakarta +Bay, +Indonesia +); + +Lemaitre & Ng, 1996: 330 + +; + +Rahayu, 1996: 348 + +. + + + + +Diogenes jubatus +McLaughlin, 2005: 612 + +(part), fig. 3. + + + + +Material examined. + +1 male +, +4.9 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0118 +), st. SD133, +South of Kusu Island +, hand collecting, dive, + +11 m + + +, + + + + +31 May 2013 + +; +1 female +, +3.3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0119 +), TB142, +east Johor Strait +, +1°17.838′N +104°04.157′E +, beam trawl, mud, gravel, dead shell, + +28.8 m + + +, + + +31 May 2013 + +; +1 female +, +2.5 mm +, +3 males +, +2.2–3.3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0120 +), st. DR174, near +Kusu Island +, +1°12.202′N +103°52.178′E +, rectangular dredge, mud and gravel, + +79.6–135 m + + +, + + +4 June 2013 + +; +1 female +, +2.4 mm +, st. TB185, +Pulau Senang +, +1°09.942′N +103°43.458′E +, beam trawl, mud, + +24.5 m + + +, + + +5 June 2013 + +; +2 males +, +1.1–2.4 mm +, 5 individuals in shell ( +ZRC 2021.0121 +), st. DR184, beside +Raffles +light house, +1°09.280′N +103°44.049′E +, rectangular dredge, rock, sand, shell fragment, + +31.6‒35.4 m + + +, + + +5 June 2014 + +; +2 males +, +0.9–1.6 mm +, +1 female +, +1.5 mm +( +MZB +Cru 5217), st. DR128, beside +Eastern Boarding Ground +, +1°09.942′N +103°43.458′E + +, + + +30 May 2013 + +; +1 male +, +2.4 mm +, +1 female +, +1.5 mm +( +MZB +Cru 5218), st. DR161, beside +St John’s Island +, +1°12.843′N +103°51.449′E +, 44.4– + +41.2 m + + +, gravel, + + +13 June 2013 + +; +1 female +, +2.4 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0122 +), st. TB113, +South Sister Island +, +1°09.942′N +103°43.458′E +, rock, + +29.3‒30.5 m + + +, + + +29 May 2013 + +; +1 female +, +2.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0123 +), st. TB91, near +St John’s Island +, +1°12.561′N +103°51.322′E +, rock, + +46.1‒72 m + + +, + + +27 May 2013 + +; +1 male +, +2.3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0124 +), SEA8139, +Singapore +; +2 males +, 2.8–4.0 mm, 1 ovigerous female, +3.5 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0125 +), SEA8128, +01°14.803′N +103°54.173′E +, + +41–45 m + + +, + + +13 May 2013 + +; +1 female +, +3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0126 +), +01°14.414′N +103°54.491′E +, sand, rock, + +61‒68 m + + +, + + +13 May 2013 + +; +2 males +( +ZRC 2021.0127 +), st. TB91, +Southern Fairway +near +St John’s Island +, +1°12.561′N +103°51.946′E +, rectangular dredge, sandy, broken shell, laterite gravel, + +48.3−49.7 m + + +, +27 May 2013 +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Shield ( +Figs. 5D +, +7C +) 1.1‒1.2 times as long as broad, with sparse tubercles and scattered long setae on dorsal surface; dorsal surface of branchiostegites with 4–5 small spines. Rostrum short, rounded, reaching level of lateral projections. Intercalary rostriform process vestigial, or reaching proximal 0.20 of ocular acicles. Ocular peduncles 0.7‒0.8 times as long as shield, dilated proximally, very slightly inflated distally, with long, dense plumose setae on dorsal surface subproximally; corneal diameter 0.1‒0.2 times as long as ocular peduncles; ocular acicles elongate, each with 3–5 strong spines. Antennular peduncles overreaching distal corneal margin by two thirds or entire length of ultimate segment. Antennal peduncles slender, reaching mid-length of ultimate segment of antennular peduncle, reaching beyond distal corneal margin by half length of fifth penduncular segment; antennal acicles relatively narrow, short, slightly overreaching mid-length of fourth peduncular segment, with 5‒6 strong mesial spines on oblique inner margin. Flagellum with very long and dense setae, primarily inserted ventrally. Left cheliped dactyl ( +Figs. 6B +, +7D +) broad, not recurved, slightly flattened, with row of calcareous-tip spines on upper margin, and few tubercles on outer surface; palm with row of strong spines on both upper and lower margins, continuing onto fixed finger, at ventroproximal angle row of spines parallel with carpal articulation curving distally along midline, terminating abruptly at about 0.2 proximal of palm; longitudinal furrow adjacent to upper margin, outer surface with scattered tubercles; long plumose setae on upper and lower margins of dactyl, palm, and fixed finger, outer surface pubescent, obscuring armature; carpus with numerous long setae but not obscuring armature, upper margin with row of strong spines, outer face with scattered tubercles. Right cheliped with chela entirely masked by long, plumose setae; dactyl with row of small spines on upper margin, palm with one dorsodistal spine followed by denticles; fixed finger with row of small spines on ventral margin; carpus with upper margin denticulate; longitudinal furrow adjacent to upper margin of palm and carpus. Left P3 more robust than P2, right P2, P3 ( +Fig. 7C, D +) with dactyl about same length as propodi, unarmed except for minute dorsodistal spinule on each carpus, and occasionally two or three denticles on proximodorsal margin of carpus of left P2; dactyl and propodus of left P3 slightly compressed laterally, abundant long, plumose setae on dorsal and ventral margins, lateral surfaces pubescent ( +Fig. 6B +); left P2, right P2, P3 with less dense setae on dorsal and ventral margin, lateral surface with few tufts of setae. Sternite of third pereopods (thoracic sternite 6) squarish ( +Fig. 5E +), anterior lobe subsemicircular with median longitudinal depression, armed with spinules and/or with central protuberance on either side of depression. Telson ( +Fig. 5F +) with left posterior lobe produced, right slightly shorter than left, median cleft barely indicated; terminal margin with series of small to moderately large spines, strongest at outer angle, on left extending onto lateral margin. + + + +Fig. 7. A, B, + +Diogenes jubatus +( +Nobili, 1903 +) + +; A, ovigerous female, not collected, Johor Strait, 21 October 2012; B, male, 5.1 mm (ZRC 2021.0114); C, D, + +Diogenes platyops +Rahayu & Forest, 1995 + +; C, male (not collected), st. TB29, Singapore Strait, 01°13.036′N 103°52.820′E, 22 May 2013; D, ovigerous female, 3.5 mm (ZRC 2021.0125); E, + +Diogenes jousseaumei +( +Bouvier, 1897 +) + +, male, 2.2 mm (ZRC 2021.0129). + + + +Colour in life. +Shield cream or pinkish white mottled with brown and light pink, setae white. Ocular peduncle white with greenish brown blotch on half proximal. Antennular peduncle penultimale segment white, ultimate segment and proximal part of flagella blue, distal part of flagella orange. Antennal peduncle second segment brown, fourth, fifth segments and proximal part of flagella blue, rest of flagella light orange. Cheliped mottled with cream and dark brown; P2 and P3 cream with greenish brown blotch dorsoproximally on each segment ( +Fig. 7C, D +). + + + + +Distribution. +Indonesia +and +Singapore +; at +24–135 m +depth, on mud, sand, gravel substrates. + + + + +Remarks. +McLaughlin (2005) demonstrated that the characters used to separate the species in the + +Troglopagurus + +group of + +Diogenes + +are mostly unreliable as they are variable depending or not, on the size and sex of individuals. These characters include the relative length of the ocular peduncles against the shield, the corneal diameter against the length of the ocular peduncles, the relative length of the antennular and antennal peduncles against the length of the ocular peduncles, the relative length of the dactyl against the propodus in the P2 and P3, the setation on the left P3 dactyl and propodus, and the armature on the ocular acicle. Based on the variability of these presumably diagnostic characters, she considered that + +D. platyops + +was a junior subjective synonym of + +D. jubatus + +. Furthermore, she gave three characters that are useful to distinguish species of the + +Troglopagurus + +group: the live colouration, the shape of the anterior lobe of the sternite of the third pereopods, and the asymmetry of the telson. + + +Examination of the specimens initially identified as + +D. jubatus + +in this study revealed two separable forms on the basis of the living colouration and the setation of the chelipeds and ambulatory legs. The first form is characterised by the following attributes: shield cream mottled with brown and dark brown; ocular peduncles dark brown or black with white band on proximal area and on area just proximal to cornea; ocular acicle white; penultimate segment of antennular peduncles, first to fourth segments of antennal peduncle, and antennal acicle dark brown with some white spot; penultimate segment of antennular peduncles, and fifth segment and flagellum of antenna cream; ground colour of chelipeds and pereopods cream to white with mottling of dark brown or light brown on proximal part of palms, most of carpi and meri of chelipeds, dactyls, median parts of propodi, carpi, and meri of P2 and P3 ( +Fig. 7A, B +); left cheliped covered with long, sometimes plumose setae on margins and entire surface of fingers and palm, obscuring armature; dactyl and propodus of left P3 covered with dense, long plumose setae on dorsal, lateral, and ventral surfaces; carpus and merus having fewer setae ( +Figs. 6A +, +7A, B +). The second form is characterised by the following attributes: shield cream or pinkish white mottled with brown and light pink; ocular peduncle with distal half white, greenish brown blotch proximally; ocular acicle also white; antennular peduncles blue; antennal peduncles generally dark brown, third and fourth segments with blue tinge on brown; fifth segment blue, flagellum orange; antennal acicle white; ground colour of chelipeds and pereopods cream to white with mottling of greenish brown or light brown on proximal part of propodi, carpi, and meri ( +Fig. 7C, D +); margins of fingers and palm of left cheliped, and margins of dactyl and propodus of left P3 bearing fringe of long dense plumose setae, outer surface with short pubescence, giving impression of flattened lateral surfaces of dactyls and propodus ( +Figs. 6B +, +7D +); carpus and merus covered with long, dense setae. + + +McLaughlin (2005) used the shape of the anterior lobe of the sternite of third pereopods to distinguish between + +D +. +jubatus + +and + +D. jousseaumei + +, while the asymmetry of the posterior lobes of the telson and the absence of row of spines on the branchiostegites were used to distinguish between + +D. jubatus + +or + +D. platyops + +and + +D. manaarensis + +. + + +The specimens of the two forms studied here have distinctly asymmetrical posterior lobes of the telson and the subquadrate-shaped anterior lobe of the sternite of P3, although it is slightly more trapezoidal in the first form specimens ( +Fig. 5B, C, E, F +), while branchiostegite is unarmed or with few minute spinules in + +D. jubatus + +, in contrast to + +D. platyops + +which has a row of four to five small spines. In addition to the differences mentioned above, other distinct morphological characters were also observed. The first form has the following features: shield as long as broad, or slightly broader than long; antennal peduncles stout, and left cheliped palm with outer surface armed with scattered small spines or tubercles. The second form has the following features: shield slightly longer than broad, antennal peduncles slender, and left cheliped with outer surface of palm armed with short row of spines medially not reaching articulation with dactyl, and with shallow longitudinal furrow between midline and upper margin. These two forms of colouration and setation, and morphological differences are not influenced by size and sex and could represent morphological markers for species discrimination. + + +Therefore, there is little doubt that the two forms recognised herewith represent two distinct species. The first form is referred to + +Diogenes jubatus + +because it closely agrees with the redescription of +Lemaitre & Ng (1996) +, particularly in the living colouration and the setation of the chelipeds and pereopods. Although no information on the living colouration was available for + +D. platyops + +, the second form is considered to represent + +D. platyops + +, resurrected from the synonymy of + +D. jubatus + +, because the setation of the chelipeds and ambulatory legs agrees well with that of the +type +specimens of the taxon. + + +Bathymetry range is overlapped between these two species, +24–135 m +for + +D. platyops + +and +0.4–39.9 m +for + +D. jubatus + +, but they do not live sympatrically. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC9E948D9C4F534FB85F291.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC9E948D9C4F534FB85F291.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c0125117d14 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFC9E948D9C4F534FB85F291.xml @@ -0,0 +1,307 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes mixtus +Lanchester, 1902 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 3A, B +, +4A +) + + + + + + + +Diogenes mixtus +Lanchester, 1902: 367 + + +, pl. 34, figs. 2, 2a, 2b ( +type +locality: Pulau Bidan, +Penang +, +Malaysia +); + +Nobili, 1903: 16 + +; + +McLaughlin & Clark, 1997: 45 + +, figs. 7f, 8f, 9i, 13a; + +McLaughlin, 2002a: 424 + +, figs. 5D, E, 6A. + + + + + +Material examined. + +2 males +, 6.3– +5.1 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0107 +), st. TB98, +Eastern Bunkering +A, +1°18.938′N +104°05.312′E +, + +30.2–33.6 m + +, + +28 May 2013 + + +; + +1 male +, +5.8 mm +( +MZB +Cru 5199), +Coney Island +, otter trawl, + +10–15 m + +, + +8 March 2012 + + +; + +1 male +, 2.0 mm ( +ZRC 2021.0108 +), st. DW28, +Singapore +Port Limit +, +Eastern Boarding Ground +A, +1°13.181′N +103°52.900′E +, + +94.3–97.6 m + +, gravel, rock, + +22 May 2013 + + +; + +1 male +, +3.1 mm +( +ZRC 1990.4088 +), +Pulau Tekong +, + +27 March 1987 + + +; + +1 male +, +9.1 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0109 +), st. SW23, +St John’s Island +, +1°13.120′N +103°51.417′E +, intertidal, + +21 May 2013 + + +; + +1 ovigerous female, +5.7 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0110 +), DW17, +Pulau Ubin +, +1°25.110′N +103°55.722′E +, + +16 October 2012 + + +; + +1 male +, 8.0 mm ( +ZRC 2021.0111 +), DW40, opposite +Changi Chalet Radar +, +1°23.797′N +103°58.751′E +, 21– +15.6 mm +, + +19 October 2012 + + +. + + +Colour in life. +In general, light cream or pinkish cream ( +Fig. 4A +). Carapace mottled brown and cream; shield mottled cream, dark and light brown on middle of dorsal surface; antennal peduncle cream with streak of greenish brown on distal part of fifth peduncular segment; antennular peduncle cream, longitudinal brown stripe on dorsal surfaces of penultimate and ultimate segments; ocular peduncle cream with longitudinal dark brown stripes on dorsal and lateral surfaces. Chelipeds cream, streak of dark brown on dorsal surface of dactyl proximally, on middle of palm, and distal part of carpus. P2 and P3 cream with streak of light brown on median part of propodi and carpi. + + + + +Distribution. +Thailand +, +Malaysia +, and +Singapore +; intertidal to depth of +97 m +, on sandy, gravel-rock, and broken shell substrates. + + + + +Remarks. + +Diogenes mixtus + +belongs to the group 1 sensu +Forest (1952) +, and is related to the six species, viz., + +D. alias +McLaughlin & Clark, 1997 + +, + +D. custos +( +Fabricius, 1798 +) + +, + +D. dubius +(Herbst, 1804) + +, +D. miles +( +Fabricius, 1787 +), + +D. planimanus +Henderson, 1893 + +, and + +D. violaceus +Henderson, 1893 + +by the presence of bifurcate antennal acicle. Morphological characters that differentiate this species from the congeners include the deep bifurcate antennal acicles with the mesial and lateral forks reaching and well exceeding the distal margin of the fourth peduncular segment, the covering of sparse spines and stiff setae on the cheliped palms, with denser and longer tuft of stiff setae on the dactyl and fixed finger ( +Fig. 3A +), and the long, slender dactyl of P2 and P3, and the presence of row(s) of small spines on the dorsal margin of the dactyls and propodi of P2 and P3 ( +Fig. 3B +). + + +The living colour of the species is described and illustrated for the first time ( +Fig. 4A +). The characteristic longitudinal stripes on the dorsal surface of the ocular peduncles, which are still preserved after preservation in ethanol, have already been mentioned by +McLaughlin (2002a) +for the specimens from Phuket. This species was reported from +Singapore +by +Nobili (1903) +, but +McLaughlin & Clark (1997) +failed to reexamine Nobili’s specimens, thus the occurrence in +Singapore +has been uncertain. This study confirms the presence of this species in +Singapore +waters. + + +RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY +2022 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCAE946DAFAF2C4FC96F4C9.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCAE946DAFAF2C4FC96F4C9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..75b7619b458 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCAE946DAFAF2C4FC96F4C9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,328 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes jubatus +( +Nobili, 1903 +) + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 5A‒C +, +6A +, +7A, B +) + + + + + + + +Troglopagurus jubatus +Nobili, 1903: 17 + + +( +type +locality: +Singapore +). + + + + + + +Diogenes jubatus +Forest, 1952: 9 + + +; + +Lemaitre & Ng, 1996: 324 + +, figs. 1–5; + +Rahayu, 1996: 344 + +; McLaughlin, 2005: 601, 612, figs. 3, 4a–c. + + + + + +Material examined. + +1 male +, +5.1 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0114 +), st. TB99, +Eastern Bunkering +A, +1°18.861′N +104°05.128′E +, silt, + +33.7–36.7 m + +, + +28 May 2013 + + +; +1 male +, +5.5 mm +, + +1 female +, +5.5 mm +( +MZB +Cru 5200), st. TB58, +Around Tanah Merah +, +1°16.808′N +103°58.246′E +, mud, + +38.7−39.9 m + +, + +24 May 2013 + + +; + +2 males +, +1.1–3.1 mm +( +MZB +Cru 5201), st. SW27, along seawall at south lagoon of +St John’s +Island +, +1°12.911′N +103°51.718′E +, + +0.5 m + +, + +22 May 2013 + + +; 1 ovigerous female, +2.2 mm +, + +1 female +, +2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0115 +), st. SB55, +Kusu Island +, +1°13.9′N +, +103°52′E +, + +4 m + +, + +24 May 2013 + + +; +1 male +, +1.5 mm +, + +1 female +, +1.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0116 +), no locality + +; + +1 female +, +2.4 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0115 +), st. TB113, +South of Sisters’ +Island +, +1°12.001′N +103°50.261′E +, rock, + +29.3–30.5 m + +, + +29 May 2013 + + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. +Shield ( +Figs. 5A +, +7A, B +) as long as broad or very slightly broader than long, with few short tubercles and tufts of setae on dorsal surface; dorsal surfaces of branchiostegites unarmed or with few minute or miniscule spinules. Rostrum short, triangular, reaching level of lateral projections. Intercalary rostriform process vestigial or reaching proximal 0.20 of ocular acicles. Ocular peduncles 0.7–0.8 times as long as shield, delated proximally, slightly tapering to cornea, with tufts of sparse setae on dorsal surface proximally; corneal diameter 0.2 times as long as ocular peduncle; ocular acicles each with 3–5 spines. Antennular peduncle overreaching distal corneal margin by entire length of ultimate segment. Antennal peduncle stout, reaching midlength of ultimate segment of antennular peduncle, reaching beyond distal corneal margin by 0.25 to entire length of fifth peduncular segment; antennal acicle reatively broad, short, not reaching half length of fourth segment, with 8–9 spines on oblique or truncate inner margin; flagellum with very long setae, primarily inserted ventrally. Left cheliped dactyl ( +Figs. 6A +, +7A, B +) with rows of strong spines on upper margin, and few granules, tubercles or spinules on outer surface; palm upper margin with tubercles or spines, lower margin with row of tubercles or spines continuing onto fixed finger, outer face with scattered small spines or tubercles; long plumose setae covering dactyl and palm entirely, concealing armature, those setae extending on inner face near upper and lower margin; carpus with numerous tufts of setae, but not concealing armature, upper margin with row of acute or subacute spines, outer face with scattered spinules or spines, distal margin usually with row of spines. Right cheliped with chela completely masked by setae; dactyl usually with row of small spines or spinules on upper margin; palm and fixed finger unarmed; carpus with prominent spine on upper distal margin and one or two somewhat smaller spines on outer distal margin. P2 and P3 ( +Figs. 6A +, +7A, B +) with dactyls equal to 1.5 times as long as propodi, unarmed, except for small dorsodistal spine on each carpus and occasionally few tubercles or spinules on ventral margins of meri of P2; left P3 covered entirely with dense setae, while left P2, right P2 and P3 with less dense setae. Sternite of third pereopods (thoracic sternite 6) subquadrate ( +Fig. 5B +), anterior lobe subsemicircular with median longitudinal depression, armed with spinules and/or with central tubercle(s) on either side of median depression. Telson ( +Fig. 5C +) with left posterior lobe strongly produced, right very short, terminal margins each with series of small to moderately large spines, strongest at outer angles and on left extending onto lateral margin. + + + +Fig. 5. A–C, + +Diogenes jubatus +( +Nobili, 1903 +) + +, male, 5.1 mm (ZRC 2021.0114); D–F, + +Diogenes platyops +Rahayu & Forest, 1995 + +, male, 4.9 mm (ZRC 2021.0118); G–I, + +Diogenes jousseaumei +( +Bouvier, 1897 +) + +, ovigerous female, 5.8 mm (ZRC 2021.0128). A, D, G, shield and cephalic appendages; B, E, H, anterior lobe of sternite of third pereopods; C, F, I, telson. Scale = 1 mm. + + + + +Fig. 6. A, + +Diogenes jubatus +( +Nobili, 1903 +) + +, male, 5.1 mm (ZRC 2021.0114); B, + +Diogenes platyops +Rahayu & Forest, 1995 + +, male, 4.9 mm (ZRC 2021.0118). A, B, left cheliped, P2 and P3. + + + +Colour in life. +Shield generally cream, mottled with brown and dark brown, setae white. Ocular peduncles dark brown or black with white streak proximally and distally, corneas black. Antennular peduncle penultimate segment cream with black streak proximally, ultimate segment and flagella cream. Antennal peduncle first to fourth segments and antennal acicle brown, fifth segments and flagella cream. Cheliped mottled with cream and dark brown; P2 and P3 generally cream, with brown band on each segment ( +Fig. 7A, B +). + + + + +Distribution. +Malaysia +and +Singapore +; at +0.5–39.9 m +depth, on substrates consisting of mixture of rock, gravel, mud, and sandy mud. + + + + +Remarks. +See Remarks section of + +Diogenes platyops + +for the taxonomic clarification. + + +Lemaitre & Ng (1996) +described the colour of the dark parts of this species as “black”, but in the newly collected specimens the dark parts are attributed as dark brown. The colour pattern is quite consistent between the present specimens and those described by +Lemaitre & Ng (1996) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCAE948D9C0F2A4FB8FF1D1.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCAE948D9C0F2A4FB8FF1D1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b7c182039f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCAE948D9C0F2A4FB8FF1D1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes planimanus +Henderson, 1893 + + + + + + + +( +Figs. 3C, D +, +4B +) + + + + + + + +Diogenes planimanus +Henderson, 1893: 416 + + +, pl. 39, figs. 5, 6 ( +type +locality: Madras, +India +); + +Tirmizi & Siddiqui, 1982: 43 + +, figs. 21, 22; + +Rahayu, 1996: 345 + +, fig. 3; + +McLaughlin & Clark, 1997: 40 + +, figs. 4a, 9c, e, 12a; + +McLaughlin, 2002a: 422 + +, fig. 5A–C; + +Siddiqui, Kazmi & McLaughlin, 2004: 164 + +, figs. 3, 4. + + + + + +Material examined. +3 males +, 4.0– +6.7 mm +, + +1 female +, +6.7 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0112 +), Red Cliff shoal area, Changi, + +27 April 1982 + + +; + +1 male +, +8.44 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0113 +), Kranji Reservoir park, 1°26.27.9′N 103°44.16.26′E, + +4 July 2009 + + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Northern Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal, Andaman Sea, +Singapore +, +Malaysia +, Gulf of +Thailand +, and northern +Australia +; intertidal to +7 m +, inhabits sandy mud substrate. + + + + +Remarks. +In having a shield that is denticulate over the entire length of its anterior margin, a weakly bifurcated antennal acicle, tuberculation of the chelipeds, the covering of tubercles on the lateral faces of the propodi, carpi, and meri, and the rows of spines on the dorsal surface of propodi and carpi of P2 and P3 ( +Fig. 3D +), the present specimens agree well with the +lectotype +of + +D. planimanus + +redescribed by +McLaughlin & Clark (1997) +and specimens from +Pakistan +examined by +Siddiqui et al. (2004) +. They differ from the +lectotype +in having only one spine on each side of the intercalary rostriform process (two or five spines on each side in the +lectotype +). +Rahayu (1996) +, +McLaughlin & Clark (1997) +, and +Siddiqui et al. (2004) +mentioned the presence of blunt or acute tubercles on the surface of the palm and fixed finger of the left cheliped. The tubercles on the outer surface of the palm and fixed finger of the left cheliped in the present specimens are more flattened, none of which are acute ( +Fig. 3C +), however a prominent row of tubercles on the outer surface of the carpus of the left cheliped is clearly indicated ( +Fig. 3C +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCDE94CDA9BF613FDEBF592.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCDE94CDA9BF613FDEBF592.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8f497398211 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCDE94CDA9BF613FDEBF592.xml @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Clibanarius ransoni +Forest, 1953 + + + + + + + + + + +Clibanarius ransoni +Forest, 1953a: 446 + + +, figs. 2, 6. ( +type +locality: Tahiti); + +Fize & Serène, 1955: 150 + +, fig. 23; + +McLaughlin et al., 2007: 131 + +, unnumbered fig. + + + + + +Material examined. + +1 male +, +3.6 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0104 +), st. MF64, Pulau Pawai, +01°11.088′N +103°43.683′E +, + +1 July 2012 + + +. + + +RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY +2022 + + + +Fig. 1. A, B, + +Clibanarius infraspinatus +Hilgendorf, 1869 + +, male, not collected; C, D, + +Clibanarius longitarsus +(De Haan, 1849) + +, female, 9.4 mm (ZRC 2021.0103). + + + +Colour in life. +Shield mottled light green and brown. Ocular peduncles reddish orange, each with bluish white band at base of corneas, tinge of dark brown proximally. Chelipeds brownish black with yellowish spines and tubercles. P2 and P3 brown or brownish black, each with broad light orange or tannish orange stripe on lateral face extending from base of claw to proximal margin of merus. + + + + +Distribution. +Indonesia +, +Vietnam +, Tahiti, and now +Singapore +; intertidal, on sandy mud and gravel substrates. + + + + +Remarks. +Rahayu (1996) +included +Singapore +in the distributional range of this species by mistake as she examined only a specimen from Batam, +Indonesia +( +Rahayu, 1996: 352 +, table 1). This is the first confirmed record of + +C. ransoni + +from +Singapore +, represented only by +one specimen +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCDE94FD800F5A8FEC0F42E.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCDE94FD800F5A8FEC0F42E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cc71711db6e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCDE94FD800F5A8FEC0F42E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Clibanarius +Dana, 1852 + + + + + + + +Remarks. + +Clibanarius + +is characterised by an elongated shield with relatively long ocular peduncles, small ocular acicles, long with very short and sparse setae of the antennal flagella, equal or subequal chelipeds, and a short telson with the posterior lobes rounded and lined with spinules. The genus comprises 58 species ( +McLaughlin et al., 2010 +; +Negri et al., 2014 +; +Marin, 2016 +) distributed in tropical and subtropical areas of the world oceans, but most of the species live in the Indo-West Pacific. With two species newly recorded here, eight species are now found in +Singapore +water ( +Rahayu, 1996 +; present study). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCDE94FD997F768FC55F12E.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCDE94FD997F768FC55F12E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3c29159bdc0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCDE94FD997F768FC55F12E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Clibanarius infraspinatus +Hilgendorf, 1869 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 1A, B +) + + + + + + + +Clibanarius infraspinatus +Hilgendorf, 1869: 97 + + +( +type +locality: +Singapore +); + +Fize & Serène, 1955: 77 + +, fig. 10; + +Rahayu, 1996: 336 + +; + +McLaughlin et al., 2007: 113 + +, unnumbered fig.; + +Malay et al., 2018: 33 + +, fig. 2G. + + + + + +Material examined. + +1 male +, not collected, st. SW33, +Changi +, +1°22.432′N +104°00.350′S +, + +18 October 2012 + + +; + +1 female +, 9.0 mm ( +ZRC 2021.0101 +), +Chek +Jawa +, + +1 July 2009 + + +; + +1 ovigerous female, not collected, st. SW156, +St. John’s Island +, +1°13.348′N +103°50.834′E +, + +3 June 2013 + + +. + + +Colour in life. +Shield cream, mottled with light and dark brown. Ocular peduncles whitish cream with dark brown longitudinal stripe on dorsal face, broader stripe proximally. Chelipeds greenish brown or dark brown with white spines and tubercles, dactyl and fixed finger light brown. P2 and P3 greenish brown or dark brown, each with light orange or tannish orange longitudinal stripe on dorsal and lateral faces extending from base of claw to proximal margin of merus ( +Fig. 1A, B +). + + + + +Distribution. +Widely distributed in the Indo-West Pacific, from the Red Sea, Indian Ocean, +Indonesia +, +Singapore +, North of +Australia +, +Philippines +, +Vietnam +, and +Japan +; intertidal. + + + + +Remarks. +A common inhabitant of sandy mud substrates, sometimes also found in mangrove environment. + +Clibanarius infraspinatus + +is easily recognised by the longitudinal stripes on the ocular peduncles and P2 and P3, and the presence of a prominent spine on the ventral margin of the merus of the chelipeds. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCFE94BDADEF79FFC59F291.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCFE94BDADEF79FFC59F291.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7f3889f1f8f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFCFE94BDADEF79FFC59F291.xml @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes +Dana, 1851 + + + + + + + +Remarks. +This genus is characterised by the presence of spinous, simple, very tiny or vestigial intercalary rostriform process between the ocular acicles, and absent or reduced crista dentata on the third maxilliped ischium. +Forest (1952) +and +Rahayu & Forest (1995) +separated the genus + +Diogenes + +into two informal groups based on the presence or absence of the lateral process on the endopod of the maxilla, and on the marginally spinose or simple intercalary rostriform process. Species with simple intercalary rostriform process (group 2 of +Forest (1952)) +were further grouped into the + +Troglopagurus + +group as defined by McLaughlin (2005), and the + +pallescens + +and + +edwardsii + +groups as defined by +Asakura & Tachikawa (2010) +. At present, the genus + +Diogenes + +comprises 76 species, living in intertidal and subtidal areas, among coral rubbles, sand or mud substrates, distributed in the East Atlantic and Indo-West Pacific (absent in the Atlantic and the Pacific coast of American continent) ( +Almon et al., 2021 +; +Rahayu, 2021 +; +Rahayu & Pratiwi, 2022 +). Previously 17 species of + +Diogenes + +were reported from +Singapore +( +Lemaitre & Ng, 1996 +; +Rahayu, 1996 +, 2015; +McLaughlin & Clark, 1997 +; +McLaughlin, 2002b +). In this paper one specific taxon is revived, and three more species are added to the fauna of +Singapore +, of which one is new to science. + + + +Fig. 2. A, B, + +Dardanus hessii +( +Miers, 1884 +) + +, male, 13.8 mm (ZRC 2021.0105), B, photo from +Rahayu & Ong, 2015 +; C, D, + +Dardanus lagopodes +( +Forskål, 1775 +) + +, male, 14.9 mm (ZRC 2021.0106); E, + +Dardanus megistos +(Herbst, 1804) + +, not measured, St John’s Island, 2013. + + + +Rahayu: Hermit crabs of +Singapore + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD2E950D80BF528FE08F76E.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD2E950D80BF528FE08F76E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ab6f10639a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD2E950D80BF528FE08F76E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Spiropagurus +Stimpson, 1858 + + + + + + + +Remarks. +The species in the genus + +Spiropagurus + +is easily recognised by the presence of squamiform ridges or tubercles bearing marginal setae on the chelipeds and ambulatory legs, the presence of long, usually coiled, terminally blunt sexual tube on the coxa of left P5 of male, and the characteristic posterior lobes of the telson being acutely triangular. Seven species are recognised ( +Han et al., 2016 +), but only one species, + +Spiropagurus spiriger +(De Haan, 1849) + +, has been recorded from +Singapore +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD2E950D9C1F4A8FB90F32E.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD2E950D9C1F4A8FB90F32E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6b346a1dd92 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD2E950D9C1F4A8FB90F32E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,206 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Spiropagurus spiriger +(De Haan, 1849) + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 14F +) + + + + + +Pagurus spiriger +De Haan, 1849: 206 + +, pl. 49, fig. 2 ( +type +locality: +Japan +). + + + + +Spiropagurus spiriger + +; + +Alcock, 1905b: 118 + +, pl. 13, fig. 1; + +Miyake, 1978: 137 + +, fig. 54; + +Miyake, 1982: 122 + +, pl. 41, fig. 5; + +Lewinsohn, 1982: 216 + +, fig. 2; + +Baba, 1986: 211 + +, fig. 155; + +Rahayu, 1996: 351 + +; + +McLaughlin, 2002a: 448 + +, fig. 9A; + +McLaughlin, Rahayu, Komai & Chan, 2007: 213 + +, unnumbered figures. + + + + + +Material examined. + +1 female +, +3.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0262 +), st. TB96, near + +Eastern Bunkering +A + +, +1°18.140′N +104°04.221′E +, beam trawl, + +22.4–25.1 m + +, clay, + +28 May 2013 + + +; + +1 male +, +2.5 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0263 +), st. TB97, +1°18.425′N +104°04.607′E +, beam trawl, clay, + +22.4–22.7 m + +, + +28 May 2013 + + +; + +1 male +, +3.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0264 +), DR09, Pasir Panjang, +01°16.229′N +103°45.358′E +, + +24 m + +, + +12 June 2012 + + +. + + +Colour. +In general brownish cream with darker brown speckled on shield and ocular peduncles, setae yellowish white ( +Fig. 14F +). + + + + +Distribution. +Bay of Bengal, Andaman Sea, Gulf of +Thailand +, East Indian Archipelago, +Singapore +, +Malaysia +, East +China +Sea, +Japan +, +Taiwan +, Northern +Australia +; +22–25 m +, on sandy, muddy substrates. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD4E950DA94F50BFD2BF1EE.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD4E950DA94F50BFD2BF1EE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7a185225db3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD4E950DA94F50BFD2BF1EE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,562 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Pagurus tenuilineatus + +, +new species + + + + + + +( +Figs. 12 +, +13 +, +14D +) + + + + +Material examined. + +Holotype +, male +4.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0254 +), st. IT81, +Sister Island +, +01°12.789′N +103°50.187′E +, rocky reef, intertidal, + +26 May 2013 + + +. + +Paratypes +, +1 male +, +4.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0255 +), st. IT65, +Terumbu Semakau +, +01°12.649′N +103°46.199′E +, sandy, rocky submerged reef, + +24 May 2013 + + +; + +3 males +, +2.8 mm +, +3.2 mm +, +4.2 mm +, 2 ovigerous females, +3.5 mm +, +4.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0256 +), st. IT93, +Pulau Jong +, +1°12.901′N +103°47.194′E +, intertidal, + +28 May 2013 + + +; 2 ovigerous females, +2.2 mm +, +2.5 mm +, +1 female +, +2.2 mm +, + +4 males +, +1.8–2.7 mm +( +MZB +Cru 5226), st. SD177, +Kusu Island +, +01°13.314′N +103°51.640′E +, dive, + +16.4 m + +, + +4 June 2013 + + +; + +10 males +, +2.4–3.3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0257 +), st. SD150, +Kusu Island +, +01°13.274′N +103°51.659′E +, dive, + +10.7 m + +, + +1 June 2013 + + +. + + +Other material. + +3 males +, +2 females +, +16 specimens +in shell ( +MZB +Cru 5227), st. TB91, +01°12.561′N +103°51.322′E +, + +46.1–72 m + +, + +27 May 2013 + + +; +1 female +(sl +1.6 mm +), no locality, SS2689; + +1 male +, +1.3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0258 +), st. DR128, +01°12.889′N +103°52.460′E +, + +75.3−85.7 m + +, rocky bottom, + +30 May 2013 + + +; + +3 males +, +1.3–1.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0259 +), st. DR161 + +; +2 males +, +1.8 mm +, +2.2 mm +, + +2 females +, +2.5 mm +, +2.9 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0260 +), st. SD145, +Pulau Hantu +, +01°13.514′N +103°44.784′E +, dive, + +11.7 m + +, + +1 June 2013 + + +; + +2 males +, +2.4 mm +, +3.3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0261 +), st. SD150, +Kusu Island +, +01°13.274′N +103°51.659′E +, dive, + +10.7 m + +, + +1 June 2013 + + +; + +1 male +, 2.0 mm ( +MZB +Cru 5228), st. DW58, east of +Pulau Tekong +, +01°25.064′N +104°04.992′E +, + +10.9–11.3 m + +, + +22 October 2012 + + +. +Description. +Shield ( +Fig. 12A +) approximately as long as broad; anterior margins between rostrum and lateral projections gently concave; anterolateral margins sloping; posterior margin truncate; dorsal surface slightly convex transversely, with longitudinal row of tufts of moderately long setae on either side of midline; paragastric grooves faint. Rostrum obtusely triangular, exceeding as far as lateral projections. Lateral projections broadly triangular, with small marginal spine. Posterior carapace (not figured), measured along midline, distinctly shorter than shield; carapace lateral lobe moderately narrow, not calcified; cardiac sulci parallel, barely reaching to midlength of posterior carapace. + + + +Fig. 12. + +Pagurus tenuilineatus + +, +new species +. Holotype, male, 4.4 mm (ZRC 2021.0254). A, shield and cephalic appendages; B, left P2; C, left P3; D, left P4; E, right P4; F, anterior lobe of sternite of third pereopods; G, telson. B–E, lateral view. Scale = 1 mm. + + + +Ocular peduncle (including cornea) ( +Fig. 12A +) relatively long, about 0.9 times as long as shield; slightly inflated basally; cornea slightly dilated, diameter about 0.2 times peduncular length; dorsal surface with longitudinal row of tufts of moderately short setae. Ocular acicles narrowly subtriangular, separated basally by width of less than one acicle, with minute marginal spine distally. Interocular lobe partially overhung by rostrum, medially concave. + + +Antennular peduncle ( +Fig. 12A +), when fully extended, slightly overreaching distal corneal margin. Ultimate segment about 1.5 times as long as penultimate segment, slightly widened distally in lateral view. Basal segment with distolateral margin produced in sharply pointed lobe; statocyst lobe weakly inflated, with small spine medially; ventromesial distal angle not produced. + + +Antennal peduncle ( +Fig. 12A +) overreaching distal corneal margins by 0.3 length of fifth segment. Fifth segment with few setae laterally. Fourth and third segments unarmed, with several tufts of long stiff setae mesially. Second segment with dorsolateral distal angle not reaching midlength of fourth segment, with 3 to 5 spinules distomesially; dorsomesial distal angle with small spine; mesial and lateral faces with short to long stiff setae. First segment with subterminal spinule on lateral face. Antennal acicle not reaching base of cornea, gently arcuate, terminating in small spine obscured by long stiff setae; dorsomesial margin with several tufts of long stiff setae. Antennal flagellum about 4 times as long as shield; each article with 1 or 2 minute setae on distal margin. + +Mouthparts not dissected. Third maxilliped moderately slender; dactyl slightly shorter than propodus; carpus, merus unarmed; ischium with crista dentata consisting of narrowly spaced, moderately large, subacute corneous teeth, and with 1 moderately strong accessory tooth; basis-ischium fusion incomplete; basis with 2 or 3 denticles on mesial margin; exopod reaching distal margin of merus. + +Chelipeds unequal. Right cheliped larger but not necessarily longer than left ( +Fig. 13A, B, D, E +); chela about 2 times as long as greatest width at base of dactyl, generally suboval in outline in dorsal view. Dactyl subequal in length to palm and slightly overlapped by fixed finger; dorsal surface with sparse, short setae and prominent median row of broad-based, closely set spines; dorsomesial margin with double row of closely set, moderately large spines, decreasing in size distally; space between dorsal midline and dorsomesial margin smooth; ventral surface with scattered tufts of moderately short stiff setae; cutting edge with row of broad calcareous teeth and adjacent row of tufts of stiff setae, terminating in large calcareous claw. Palm slightly shorter than carpus; dorsomesial margin delimited by single row of moderately large, stout spines ( +Fig. 13A, D +); dorsal surface convex, with numerous, small, scattered tubercles and tuft of short setae; dorsolateral margin delimited by small spines extending onto fixed finger, decreasing in size distally; fixed finger dorsal surface slightly depressed and with scattered tubercles, cutting edge with row of moderately large calcareous teeth, terminating in large calcareous claw; mesial face with scattered, very low, minute to small protuberances and sparse very short setae; lateral surface with scattered tufts of short stiff setae; ventral surface gently convex, with scattered tufts of short and long setae. Carpus slightly shorter than merus; dorsodistal margin with row of small spines, dorsomesial margin delimited by row of large spines accompanied by tufts of long stiff setae, dorsal surface with tufts of short to long stiff setae; dorsolateral margin delimited by row of small tubercles obscured by long setae; lateral face nearly glabrous except for some tufts of setae; mesial face ( +Fig. 13B, E +) with few sparse long setae, ventromesial margin produced into flattened, wing-like crest in both sexes ( +Fig. 13A, D +), edge of crest unarmed or with small tubercles in female ( +Fig. 13D +); ventral surface with few tufts of setae. Merus with 1 prominent spine on dorsodistal margin; dorsal surface glabrous; lateral surface nearly glabrous except for few tufts of short setae, ventromesial margin produced in flattened, wing-like crest in males, edge of crest with tiny tubercles distally, strong spine proximally ( +Fig. 13B +), in females no wing-like crest developed, but with row of spines and one prominent spine proximally ( +Fig. 13E +); ventral surface with some low, blister-like protuberances and tufts of moderately long setae. Ischium with tufts of short setae on all surfaces. + + +Left cheliped ( +Fig. 13C, F +) slenderer than right, moderately compressed laterally. Chela elongate subovate in dorsal view, 3.2 times longer than greatest width at base of dactyl. Dactyl about 2.7 times as long as palm, nearly straight with ventrally curved tip; dorsomesial margin with double row of strong spines on proximal 0.7, distal 0.3 smooth; dorsomesial margin and surfaces with tufts of long setae; cutting edge with row of minute, subacute calcareous denticles in proximal 0.4 and row of minute, closely set corneous teeth in distal 0.6, terminating in small corneous claw. Palm about half length of carpus; dorsomesial margin with row of spines, dorsal surface with double row of spines adjacent to dorsomesial margin, extending onto articulation with dactyl, remaining surface with scattered small tubercles; dorsolateral margin with row of spines extending onto tip of fixed finger; fixed finger dorsal surface with longitudinal row of moderately large spines extending along cutting edge, remaining dorsal surface with scattered tubercles; cutting edge bearing row of minute calcareous denticles terminating in moderately large corneous claw; moderately broad hiatus between dactyl and fixed finger. All surfaces with tufts of long setae. Carpus subequal in length to merus; dorsodistal margin with several strong spines; dorsomesial margin with row of moderately large spines; dorsal surface with few tubercles and sparse setae; dorsolateral margin with row of small spines and tufts of short setae; mesial and lateral surface with tufts of short and long setae; ventrolateral margin with row of small spines. Merus with prominent spine on dorsodistal margin; dorsal surface with sparse short stiff setae; lateral and mesial surfaces nearly glabrous except for row of tufts of stiff setae adjacent to dorsal margin and few similar tufts near ventral margin; ventrolateral margin with row of slender, sharp spines and long stiff setae; ventromesial margin with row spines, 2 larger spines proximally. Female left cheliped same as male. + + + +Fig. 13. A–C, + +Pagurus tenuilineatus + +, +new species +. Holotype, male, 4.4 mm (ZRC 2021.0254); D–F, paratype, ovigerous female, 4.2 mm (ZRC 2021.0256). A, D, chela and carpus of right cheliped, dorsolateral view; B, E, chela, carpus and merus of right cheliped, mesial view; C, chela and carpus of left cheliped, dorsolateral view; F, chela, carpus and merus of left cheliped, mesial view. Scale = 1 mm. + + + +P2 and P3 ( +Fig. 12B, C +) stout, right P2 slightly overreaching tip of extended right cheliped. Dactyls 0.9‒1.0 times as long as propodi, 4.3–4.6 times longer than broad, in dorsal view nearly straight, in lateral view slightly curving ventrally; dorsal and ventral margins each with row of tufts of short to moderately long setae, ventral margins each with row of 5‒6 moderately large corneous spines increasing in size distally. Propodi slightly narrowing distally; dorsal surfaces unarmed but with row of long stiff setae; lateral and mesial surfaces with few tufts of long stiff setae; ventral surfaces with few tufts of long stiff setae. Carpi each with small dorsodistal spine; with row of tufts of long stiff setae on dorsal margin; lateral surface convex, with row of tufts of long stiff setae along midline. Meri each with row of tufts of long stiff setae on dorsal surface; lateral surface almost smooth, with few tufts of long stiff setae distally; ventral surface unarmed but with row of tufts of short to long stiff setae, ventrodistal lateral margin unarmed. Ischia unarmed but with tufts of setae on dorsal and ventral margins. + + +P4 semichelate, left ( +Fig. 12D +) slightly larger than right ( +Fig. 12E +). Dactyls slightly curved ventrally, terminating in small corneous claw; each with row of minute, closely spaced corneous teeth on ventral margin; no preungual process. Propodal rasp consisting of 1 row of corneous scales. All segments with dorsal and/or ventral tufts of long stiff setae. + + +Anterior lobe of sternite of third pereopod ( +Fig. 12F +) subrectangular, ventral surface with tufts of setae medially. +Male +with 3 unequally uniramous pleopods. Female second to fifth pleopods greatly unequally biramous with much elongate exopods; length third> second> fourth> fifth. + + +Telson ( +Fig. 12G +) with distinct lateral indentations; posterior lobes strongly produced, rounded, unequal, median cleft shallow; each terminal margin with row of numerous slender spines interspersed by spinules, not extending onto lateral margin. + + +Colour in life. +Shield mottled with light brown and white, with dark brown patches on anterolateral and dorsodistal surface. Ocular peduncle whitish proximally; narrow brown ring at base of cornea and broad brown patch proximally; cornea dark brown. Antennular peduncle generally blue, distal part of penultimate segment and flagella orange. Antennal peduncle generally white; second and fourth segments each with three dark brown longitudinal stripes on dorsal surface, fifth segment with dark brown stripe on lateral and mesial margin; flagellum with brown stripe along lateral and mesial margin of each article, white on articulation of each segment. Right cheliped mottled with light brown and white in general, with large dark brown patches and stripes; mesial surfaces of carpus and merus with irregular patterns of dark brown on white background. Left cheliped with thin brown lines on white background on chela, carpus, and merus. Ambulatory legs with thin dark brown stripes on propodi, carpi, meri, and ischia; dactyls each with one dark brown median stripe and two broad light brown bands (one subdistal and one proximal); propodi, carpi, and meri each with three dark brown stripes on lateral surface, with broad light brown band medially. Dark brown stripes on chelipeds and ambulatory legs usually reaching ends of segments ( +Fig. 14E +). + + + + +Distribution. +At present known only from +Singapore +; +0–85 m +, on reef, sandy and rocky bottom. + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from Latin +tenuis +, meaning slender, and +linea +, meaning stripes, alluding to the narrow stripes on the chelipeds and pereopods, used as a noun in apposition. + + + + +Remarks. +The characters of this new species correspond with the + +Pagurus anachoretus + +group as defined by +Forest & Ngoc-Ho (1992) +and +McLaughlin & Forest (1999) +. Among the species in this group, + +P. tenuilineatus + +, +new species +, belongs to the group which have wing-like projection on mesial face of the carpus and merus of the right cheliped, i.e., + +P. boriaustraliensis + +, + +P. gordonae +( +Forest, 1956b +) + +, + +P. hedleyi + +, + +P. kulkarnii + +, + +P. liochele +( +Barnard, 1947 +) + +, + +P. pitagsaleei + +, and + +P. sticticus +McLaughlin, 2007b + +. The presence of a row of moderately large spines on the dorsal surface of the fixed finger of the left cheliped, extending along cutting edge but not reaching the distal part of the finger, separates this new species from its congeners. Furthermore, differences between congeners are also observed on the proportion of the dactyl and palm of the left cheliped. In + +P. tenuilineatus + +, +new species +, the dactyl of the left cheliped (2.7 times as long as palm) is much longer than that of + +P. boriaustraliensis + +and + +P. pitagsaleei + +(1.5 times as long as palm), + +P. gordonae + +(almost as long as palm), + +P. liochele + +(1.3–2 times as long as palm), + +P. kulkarnii + +(2.5 times as long as palm), and + +P. sticticus + +(1.8 times as long as palm), whereas in + +P. hedleyi + +the left cheliped has a much longer dactyl (3.3 times as long as palm). + + +Although living colouration of the species in the + +anachoretus + +group is quite specific, with colour pattern usually consisting of patches and longitudinal stripes of pigment that cover part or all of the segment of the chelipeds and ambulatory legs ( +McLaughlin & Forest, 1999 +), the position and colour pigmentation of the stripes and patches are different from one species to another. The colouration for + +P. hedleyi + +, + +P. kulkarnii + +, + +P. pitagsaleei + +, and + +P. tenuilineatus + +has been described above and differences can be seen in +Fig. 14 +. +Forest (1956b) +described the colour of + +P. gordonae + +as follows: shield, ocular and atennal peduncles are greenish grey with brown longitudinal patches, antennnular peduncle with large brown band on penultimate segment, ultimate segment brown on distal half; antennal flagella alternately brown and white; chelipeds greenish brown, carpi and meri with irregular longitudinal stripes; ambulatory legs with irregular brown stripes on half proximal of each segment, half distal orange without any stripes. +McLaughlin & Forest (1999: 322) +cited the colour of + +P. liochele + +after +Barnard (1950) +as follows: ocular peduncle sienna at base, distal half cobalt, with narrow dark sienna ring immediately adjacent to black cornea, meral segment of left and right chelipeds with cobalt band border with sienna, and distal margin dark sienna; granules on dorsal surface of palm white on pale sienna ground, sienna longitudinal stripes on dactyl and fixed finger; proximal halves of meral segment of second and third pereopods sienna, distal halves pale, longitudinal sienna stripes on carpi and dactyls and dorsally on proximal halves of propodi, distal halves of propodi yellowish, passing into cobalt apically. + +Pagurus boriaustraliensis + +shield is cream or pale brown with dark brown mottling, ocular peduncle cream with black or reddish black short longitudinal stripes distally and proximally, chelipeds cream brownish with dark brown line, ambulatory legs with longitudinal brown stripes, and with brown band around midline ( +Morgan, 1990 +). The colouration in life of + +P. sticticus + +is not known, but in preservative the ambulatory legs have orange spots and patches on each segment ( +McLaughlin, 2007b +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD8E95AD9DBF2E8FD8EF534.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD8E95AD9DBF2E8FD8EF534.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..78be6cb9679 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD8E95AD9DBF2E8FD8EF534.xml @@ -0,0 +1,238 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes singaporensis +Rahayu, 2015 + + + + + + + + +Diogenes singaporensis +Rahayu, 2015: 186 + +, figs. 3–6 ( +type +locality: +Singapore +). + + + + +Material examined. + +1 male +, +1.3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0168 +), +Changi +, coll +C.M. Yang +, + +18 January 1995 + + +; + +1 ovigerous female, +1.6 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0169 +), +Changi +, coll. +H. K. Lua +, + +16 February 1995 + + +; +7 males +, +1.6–2.2 mm +, + +5 females +, +1.3–1.6 mm +, 1 ovigerous female, +1.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0170 +), +Chek +Jawa +, +Pulau Ubin +, + +21 September 2001 + + +; + +11 males +, +2.5–3.1 mm +( +MZB +Cru 5208), +Red +cliff, shoal area +Changi +, + +16 November 2008 + + +; +15 males +, +1.8–3.1 mm +, + +1 female +, +2.4 mm +, 1 ovigerous female, +1.8 mm +( +MZB +Cru 5209), +Chek +Jawa +, + +1 July 2009 + + +; + +17 males +(sl +1.3–2.5 mm +), 8 ovigerous females, +1.45–1.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0171 +), st. S16, +Chek +Jawa +, seagrass bed, sandflat, + +7 March 2012 + + +; + +1 male +, +1.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0172 +), st. M18, +Kampung Sungai Durian +, nipah mangrove, + +7 March 2012 + + +; + +3 males +, +1.3–1.6 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0173 +) st. SW53, +Seringat Kias +, +1°13.630′N +103°51.218′E +, artificial lagoon, hand collecting, sandy beach, seagrass, + +24 May 2013 + + +; +7 males +, +1.1–3.1 mm +, + +4 females +, +1.1–2.7 mm +, 1 ovigerous female, +1.3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0174 +), st. IT86, +Cyrene Reef +, +1°15.374′N +103°44.816′E +, intertidal, + +27 May 2013 + + +. + + + + +Distribution. +So far known only from +Singapore +; intertidal, on sandy substrate and seagrass bed. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BD984F028FEA5F635.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BD984F028FEA5F635.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..631d86efd76 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BD984F028FEA5F635.xml @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes spinicarpus +Rahayu & Forest, 1995 + + + + + + + + + + +Diogenes spinicarpus + +Rahayu & Forest, 1995: 406 + + + +, figs. 6a–f, 7a–h ( +type +locality: +Tanjung Tiram +, +Ambon +, +Indonesia +). + + + + + +Material examined. + +1 male +, +1.6 mm +( +MZB +Cru 5219), +Pulau Hantu +, dive, + +7–10 m + +, + +16 December 2012 + + +; + +1 male +, +1.3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0219 +), st. SD143, east of +Pulau Hantu +, dive, + +12 m + +, + +13 May 2013 + + +; + +1 male +, +2.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0220 +), +Pulau Semakau +, near mangrove, + +10 November 2011 + + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Indonesia +, +Singapore +; +0–10 m +, in sandy substrate. + + + + +Remarks. +Among the species of the + +Diogenes pallescens + +group, + +D. spinicarpus + +is recognisable by the short fourth segment of the antennal penduncles armed with a strong spine on the dorsodistal margin, the slender antennal acicles bearing two or three spines mesially, and the proximally inflated ocular peduncle with a similar dilated cornea. The specimens examined in this study agree well with the original description by +Rahayu & Forest (1995) +except for the right cheliped that has a prominent hiatus between dactyl and fixed finger. This species is recorded for the first time in +Singapore +waters. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BD9E8F562FD4BFA19.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BD9E8F562FD4BFA19.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..37469a79316 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BD9E8F562FD4BFA19.xml @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes tumidus +Rahayu & Forest, 1995 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 9D +) + + + + + + + +Diogenes tumidus +Rahayu & Forest, 1995: 402 + + +, fig. 5 ( +type +locality: Sorong, +Papua +, +Indonesia +); + +Rahayu, 1996: 349 + +; + +McLaughlin, 2002a: 420 + +, fig. 4D–F; + +McLaughlin et al., 2007: 142 + +, unnumbered figures. + + + + + +Material examined. + +14 males +, 2.0– +2.9 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0221 +), st. IT140, +Tekukor +, +1°13.899′N +103°50.265′E +, hand collecting, intertidal, + +31 May 2013 + + +; + +2 males +, +1.3–1.8 mm +, 2 ovigerous females, +1.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0222 +), st. SW50, +St John’s Island +, +1°13.21′N +103°50.46′E +, rubble beach, + +23 May 2013 + + +; + +1 male +, +2.5 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0223 +), +Chek +Jawa +, + +1 July 2009 + + +; + +1 male +, +2.5 mm +, st. SW117, +St John’s Island +north lagoon, +1°13.116′N +103°51.079′E +, + +30 May 2013 + + +; + +8 males +, +2.4–3.5 mm +( +MZB +Cru 5220), +Pulau Semakau +, + +11 September and 9 October 2010 + + +. + + +Colouration in life. +Shield mottled with light brown and cream with dark brown spot medially; ocular peduncle creamy white with dark brown streak proximal to corneas to proximal part, corneas dark grey with reddish brown streak at base. Chelipeds generally light brown with dark brown streak on dorsolateral surface of palm and carpus, spines white. P2 and P3 light brown or cream with dark brown streak on dorsolateral margin of dactyls, propodi and carpi ( +Fig. 9D +). + + + + +Distribution. +Thailand +, +Singapore +, +Indonesia +; intertidal to shallow subtidal; occurring in sandy and rubble beaches. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BDA80F3E8FAECF4F0.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BDA80F3E8FAECF4F0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..692351babd0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BDA80F3E8FAECF4F0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Paguristes longirostris +Dana, 1852 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 11A +) + + + + + + + +Paguristes longirostris +Dana, 1852: 436 + + +( +type +locality: East Indies); + +Nobili, 1903: 21 + +; + +Alcock, 1905b: 36 + +, pl. 1, fig. 5; + +Rahayu, 1996: 350 + +; + +McLaughlin, 2002a: 392 + +. + + + + + +Material examined. +1 male +, +6.4 mm +, 2 ovigerous females, +5.8 mm +, +6.4 mm +, st. TB58, Around Tanah Merah, +1°16.808′N +103°58.246′E +, mud, +38.7‒39.9 m +, +24 May 2013 +; + +1 male +, +2.5 mm +( +ZRC 1991.9679 +), Pulau Semakau + +; + +1 male +, +9.5 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0225 +), st. DW58, Pulau Semakau, + +10 August 2010 + + +. + + +Colour in life. +Colour in general cream or cream with tinge of brown. Shield mottled yellowish tan or light brown; ocular peduncle light brown or dark orange, distal part bright orange, corneas yellow with black blotch medially; ocular acicle light brown or dark orange; ultimate segment and flagella of antennular peduncle light blue; antennal peduncle brown, flagellum blue; chelipeds cream, meri each with large blue spot on each lateral and mesial surfaces; P2 and P3 cream, dactyls with dark brown stripes distally and proximally, lateral surfaces of propodi each with longitudinal brown stripe medially, two stripes on carpi and meri ( +Fig. 11A +). + + + + +Distribution. +East coast of +India +, Andaman Sea off +Phuket +, +Thailand +, and +Singapore +; at depths of +30–40 m +, in sandy mud substrate. + + + + +Remarks. +The scale-like, imbricated tubercles on the chelipeds, and a large, rounded blue spot on lateral and mesial surfaces of the merus of the chelipeds immediately separate this species from other species in + +Paguristes + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BDAB5F626FA1BF5F0.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BDAB5F626FA1BF5F0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..576759096fc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BDAB5F626FA1BF5F0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Pseudopaguristes +McLaughlin + +, +2002 + + + + + + +Remarks. +Currently 14 species of + +Pseudopaguristes + +are recognised, occurring in intertidal to upper bathyal depths; restricted to the Indo-West Pacific ( +McLaughlin et al., 2010 +). Two species are now known from +Singapore +, of which one species, + +P. hians +( +Henderson, 1888 +) + +, is newly recorded. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BDAC7F188FC4AF0AE.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BDAC7F188FC4AF0AE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a120d4da21c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFD9E95BDAC7F188FC4AF0AE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Paguristes +Dana, 1852 + + + + + + + +Remarks. +The genus + +Paguristes + +has been well studied in the last twenty years ( +Forest & McLaughlin, 2000 +; +Komai, 2001 +, +2009 +, 2010; +McLaughlin, 2004 +, +2007a +; +McLaughlin & Rahayu, 2005 +; Rahayu, 2006, 2007, 2021; +Rahayu & McLaughlin, 2006 +; +Rahayu & Forest, 2009 +; +Ayon-Parente & Hendrickx, 2013 +; +Komai et al., 2015a +), and currently 120 species are recognised living in subtidal to the deep sea, distributed in the world oceans ( +McLaughlin et al., 2010 +; +Komai et al., 2015a +; +Rahayu, 2021 +). This genus is characterised by the presence of 13 pairs of gills, the first and second pleopods modified as gonopods in males, and the presence of paired first pleopods and a brood pouch in females. In +Singapore +only one species has been recorded ( +Rahayu, 1996 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFDBE959D80FF0C8FE99F16E.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFDBE959D80FF0C8FE99F16E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b99c4a17456 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFDBE959D80FF0C8FE99F16E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Pagurus +Fabricius, 1775 + + + + + + + +Remarks. + +Pagurus + +is the richest genus in the family +Paguridae +with 175 valid species ( +McLaughlin et al., 2010 +; +Osawa, 2012 +; +Komai & Rahayu, 2014 +; +Komai et al., 2015b +; +Lima & Lemaitre, 2016 +; +Lemaitre et al., 2017 +; Landschoff et al., 2018; +Lima et al., 2019 +). In +Singapore +waters, this genus has been represented only by two species, + +P. kulkarnii +Sankoli, 1962 + +and + +P. pergranulatus +( +Henderson, 1896 +) ( +Rahayu, 1996 +) + +. In this study three more species were added to the pagurid fauna of +Singapore +, one of which is a new species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFDCE95CD9F4F754FE4FF30E.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFDCE95CD9F4F754FE4FF30E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0407a9faebb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFDCE95CD9F4F754FE4FF30E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes moosai +Rahayu & Forest, 1995 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 8E +) + + + + + + + +Diogenes moosai + +Rahayu & Forest, 1995: 392 + + + +, fig. 2a, c–f, i ( +type +locality: +Muara Karang +, +Jakarta +Bay +, +Indonesia +); +Rahayu +, 2015: 183, figs. 2, 7B. + + + + + +Material examined. + +3 ovigerous females, 2.0– +2.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0153 +), st. M24, +Pulau Ketam +, mud flat, + +8 March 2012 + +; +7 males + +, + +2.5–3.5 mm +, 1 ovigerous female, +2.3 mm +( +MZB +Cru +5205), st. DW36, +Pulau Serangoon +, +1°24.545′N +103°55.992′E +, + +16–18.6 m + +, + +19 October 2012 + +; +1 male + +, + +2.9 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0154 +), st. DW61, off +Pulau Serangoon +, +01°24.962′N +103°55.341′E +, + +7–11 m + +, + +23 October 2012 + +; +1 female + +, + +2.0 mm ( +ZRC 2021.0155 +), st. DR11-191, +01°24.046′N +103°39.574′E +, + +7.2–11.2 m + +, + +27 June 2012 + +; +1 male + +, + +3.1 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0156 +), st. SW110, +Singapore +Port Limit +, 1°12′988 N 103°52′891 E, mangrove, + +29 May 2013 + +; +1 male + +, + +2.4 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0157 +), st. MF12, +Kranji +natural trail, +01°26.590′N +103°44.240′E +, mud flat, + +21 May 2011 + +; +1 male + +, + +3.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0158 +), +Singapore +, + +20 March 2014 + +; +1 male + +, + +1.1 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0159 +), JS1275, st. DW40, +01°23.797′N +103°58.751′E +, + +15.6–21 m + +, + +19 October 2012 + +; +2 males + +, + +1.6–1.8 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0160 +), st. SW13, +Chek Jawa +, +Pulau Ubin +, mud flat, + +16 October 2012 + + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Singapore +, +Indonesia +; intertidal and subtidal to +21 m +, on mud flat, and sandy, gravel substrates. + + + + +Remarks. +Rahayu (2015) gave a short diagnosis and a description of the colouration in life on the basis of the material from +Johor +Strait. The specimens examined in this study are smaller than those examined by Rahayu (2015), however because of the following specific characters, the identification is justified: the possession of a long antennal acicle that is overreaching the base of the fourth antennal peduncular segment; the relatively small corneas; the convex outer surface of the palm of the left cheliped that is covered with spinulose tubercles and with a strong median ridge; and the presence of a longitudinal brown stripe on the dorsal surface of the ocular peduncle. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFDEE95DD83DF008FA8DF16E.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFDEE95DD83DF008FA8DF16E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..97f6c3832a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFDEE95DD83DF008FA8DF16E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes pisinnus + +, +new species + + + + + + +( +Fig. 10 +) + + + + +Material examined. + +Holotype +, male, +1.3 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0203 +), st. DR02, off +Seringat Kias +, + +Lazarus +Island + +, coll. CMBS, + +11 m + +, + +23 April 2012 + +. + + + + + +Description. +Shield ( +Fig. 10A +) slightly longer than broad; rostrum broadly rounded; anterior margin between rostrum and lateral projections somewhat concave; lateral projections triangular, exceeding tip of rostral lobe, each with small marginal spine; anterolateral angle rounded; lateral margins glabrous; posterior margin slightly concave; dorsal surface with few small spines and tufts of sparse setae. Dorsal margins of branchiostegites each with row of 6 small spines. + + +Ocular peduncle ( +Fig. 10A +) moderately stout, cylindrical, about 0.8 length of shield, slightly inflated proximally, with tufts of very sparse setae dorsally; cornea not dilated, its diameter about 0.3 of peduncular length. Ocular acicles broad, subrectangular, basally separated by approximately 0.2 width of 1 acicle, with row of spinules on terminal margin, mesialmost spine largest. Intercalary rostriform process stout, simple at tip, not reaching tip of mesial spine of ocular acicle, with few long setae; no ventral spine. + + +Antennular peduncle ( +Fig. 10A +), when fully extended, overreaching distal corneal margin by whole length of ultimate segment. Ultimate and penultimate segments unarmed, but with few short setae. Basal segment with few long setae. + + +Antennal peduncle ( +Fig. 10A +) overreaching distal corneal margin by 0.7 length of fifth segment; fifth segment with row of long setae laterally; fourth segment with triangular dorsodistal margin, unarmed; third segment short, stout, unarmed; second segment with dorsolateral distal angle produced into small but prominent spine, dorsomesial distal angle with or without small spine, mesial and lateral margins with few setae; first segment unarmed. Antennal acicle short, subtriangular, reaching midlength of fourth segment, with strong terminal spine; mesial margin with 1 large spine and few setae. Antennal flagellum long, overreaching tip of left cheliped; each article with three or four long plumose setae. + +Third maxilliped with coxa and basis unarmed; crista dentata on ischium obsolete; merus subequal in length to carpus, both segments with long setae on mesial margin, lateral margin with fewer setae; propodus slightly shorter than carpus; dactyl shorter than propodus, both with dense setae ventrally. + +Left cheliped ( +Fig. 10B +) much larger than right, narrow hiatus between dactyl and fixed finger. Dactyl slightly longer than palm, arched; cutting edge with row of blunt calcareous teeth increasing in size proximally and few tufts of short setae, terminating in small calcareous claw overlapped by claw of fixed finger; outer surface with sparse short setae, smooth medially, longitudinal row of tubercles near upper margin, not reaching distal end of dactyl, and irregular row of tubercles near cutting edge; upper margin with row of small spines decreasing in size distally and long plumose setae; inner surface slightly convex, with longitudinal row of tufts of short setae. Palm upper margin with row of moderately small spines; convex outer surface with irregular longitudinal row of small spines on midline not reaching articulation with dactyl; additional row of large but widely spaced spines between midline and upper margin; lower outer surface of palm with sparse spines forming irregular longitudinal rows; lower margin delimited by row of subacute spines or tubercles; inner surface almost smooth and glabrous except for few setae. Fixed finger outer surface with sparse small blunt tubercles; lower margin delimited by row of moderately small spines, interspersed with long plumose setae; cutting edge with row of calcareous teeth, large tooth subdistally; terminating in large calcareous claw; inner surface with scattered small tubercles near cutting edge and few scattered tufts of short setae. Carpus slightly longer than palm; upper margin with row of prominent spines and sparse long setae; outer surface convex bearing scattered small tubercles; lower margin with large spine distally and few small spines medially; inner surface with few tubercles and sparse setae. Merus subtriangular in dorsal view; dorsodistal margin with strong spine; dorsal surface with rows of moderately small spines and tufts of long plumose setae; lateral face tuberculate, ventrolateral margin with row of large spines, distal spines strongest and accompanied by long setae; mesial face flattened, smooth, ventromesial margin with row of moderately large spines, distal spines strongest and accompanied by plumose setae; ventral surface tuberculate. Ischium unarmed, with sparse short setae on ventromesial margin. + + +Right cheliped ( +Fig. 10C +) reaching proximal third of palm of left cheliped; no hiatus between dactyl and fixed finger. Dactyl slightly longer than palm; upper margin with row of evenly spaced small spines and numerous long setae; outer surface smooth but with moderately dense long setae; cutting edge with row of low, blunt calcareous teeth, terminating in moderately large calcareous claw overlapped by fixed finger. Palm with row of moderately small spines and tufts of long setae on upper margin; outer surface smooth but with long setae; fixed finger with sparse tubercles partially obscured by long setae on outer surface; lower margin smooth but with sparse long setae; cutting edge with row of small calcareous teeth, terminating in moderately large calcareous claw. Carpus with row of small spines on upper margin; outer face almost smooth, small dorsodistal spine and two small spines on distolateral margin. Merus with numerous long, simple or plumose setae; ventromesial (not illustrated) and ventrolateral margins each with 2 large spines distally and long, simple and plumose setae. Ischium unarmed, but with few long setae. + + +P2 and P3 ( +Fig. 10D–G +) slender. P2 ( +Fig. 10D, F +) with dactyls 1.2 times as long as propodi, somewhat curved ventrally, but not twisted in dorsal view, terminating in moderately small corneous claws; dorsal and ventral margins each with moderately dense mixture of short and long, plumose, and simple setae; mesial surfaces each with row of plumose setae near dorsal margin. Propodi 1.5 times as long as carpi, unarmed, each with moderately dense long setae on dorsal and ventral margins; mesial faces each with few setae. Carpi 0.7 times as long as meri; dorsal margins each with row of small spines and sparse, long setae; ventral margins unarmed. Meri each with sparse setae on each dorsal and ventral margin, otherwise unarmed. Ischia unarmed, each with sparse setae. P3 ( +Fig. 10E, G +) with dactyls and propodi same as in P2; carpi 0.9 times as long as meri, each with prominent dorsodistal spine, and sparse setae, lateral faces and ventral margins unarmed; meri and ischia also unarmed but with few setae. P4 semichelate ( +Fig. 10H +); propodal rasp consisting of three rows of calcareous scales, carpi each with dorsodistal spine. + + +Telson ( +Fig. 10I +) without median cleft; left posterior lobe longer than right, left terminal margin with row of strong spines extending onto lateral margin, becoming smaller; right terminal margin also with row of small spines, but not extended onto lateral margin; long setae at outer angles continued onto lateral margins. + + +Colour. +Unknown. + + + + +Etymology. +The name is derived from Latin + +pisinnus + +, meaning small, alluding to the small antennal acicle which has only two spines. + + + + +Distribution. +At the moment found only in +Singapore +Strait, at +11 m +depth, on shell fragment substrate. + + + + +Remarks. +One of the characteristics of the new species is the short antennal acicle, which barely reaches to the midlength of the fourth segment of the antennal peduncle. This feature is shared with only six congeneric species among the 31 known species of the + +D. edwardsii + +group: + +D. dorotheae +Morgan & Forest, 1991 + +, + +D. guttatus +Henderson, 1888 + +, + +D. holthuisi +Asakura & Tachikawa, 2010 + +, + +D. tirmiziae +Siddiqui & McLaughlin, 2003 + +, + +D. takedai +Rahayu, 2012 + +, and + +D. heteropsammicola +Igawa & Kato, 2017 + +. The antennal acicle of this new species is widely bifid, and in this regard, the new species resembles + +D. holthuisi + +and + +D. heteropsammicola + +. + +Diogenes pisinnus + +, +new species +, however, is readily distinguished from the latter two species by the subrectangular ocular acicle (subtriangular in + +D. holthuisi + +and + +D. heteropsammicola + +), the presence of row of spines on dorsal margin of the carpus of P2 (only a distal spine in + +D. holthuisi + +and + +D. heteropsammicola + +), the presence of a strong dorsodistal spine on P4 carpus (no spine in + +D. holthuisi + +and + +D. heteropsammicola + +), and the asymmetrical lobe of the telson with row of small spines on the right lobe, larger spines on the left lobe (asymmetrical with one to five spines of various size on each lobe in + +D. holthuisi + +, symmetrical with strong spines on each lobe in + +D. heteropsammicola + +) which separate these three species. + + +In the unique +holotype +, the ocular peduncle apparently tapers distally, though it is not yet ascertained if the condition is real or an artefact caused by preservation. Nevertheless, comparison with + +D. takedai + +, which normally has a tapering ocular peduncle, would be interesting. The two species differ in the armature of the chelipeds and the telson. In + +D. pisinnus + +, the chelipeds are only sparsely spinose (covered by small, drop-like tubercles in + +D. takedai + +), and the telson with row of small spines on the right lobe, larger spines on the left lobe, and small spines continuing onto lateral margins (row of small spines on both lobes, interspersed by large spines and continued onto lateral margin of left lobe in + +D. takedai + +). + + + +Diogenes dorotheae + +is readily distinguished from the new species by having the antennal acicles armed with three strong spines, and the subtriangular telson with strong spines on the terminal margin of each lobe, while + +D. guttatus + +and + +D. tirmiziae + +are very different from the new species in having mushroom-shaped tubercles on the palm of the left cheliped, as well as the propodi and carpi of P2 and P3 with row of spines on the dorsal margin in + +D. tirmiziae + +and the row of spines only on the carpi of P +2 in + +D. guttatus + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/87/37778780FFDFE95ADA85F2A8FDFDF1AE.xml b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFDFE95ADA85F2A8FDFDF1AE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..81ae151baa0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/87/37778780FFDFE95ADA85F2A8FDFDF1AE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,332 @@ + + + +Hermit crabs of Singapore (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Diogenidae, Paguridae), with description of two new species + + + +Author + +Rahayu, Dwi Listyo + +text + + +Raffles Bulletin of Zoology + + +2022 + +2022-05-31 + + +70 + + +329 +363 + + + +journal article +10.26107/RBZ-2022-0017 +2345-7600 +7174641 +6A65DD81-A22F-4901-8B2A-029695E4AB43 + + + + + + + +Diogenes rectimanus +Miers, 1884 + + + + + + + +( +Fig. 8F +) + + + + + + + +Diogenes rectimanus +Miers, 1884: 262 + + +, pl. 27, fig. c ( +type +locality: Prince of Wales Channel, Torres Strait); + +McLaughlin & Clark, 1997: 37 + +, fig. 10b; + +McLaughlin, 2002a: 414 + +, fig. 2A–C; + +Asakura, 2020: 6 + +, figs. 18–21. + + + + +? + +Diogenes rectimanus + +– + +Henderson, 1893: 419 + +; + +Alcock, 1905b: 71 + +, pl. 6, fig. 8, 8a, pl. 7, fig. 2, 2a. + + + + +Not + +Diogenes rectimanus + +– + +Lanchester, 1902: 366 + +. + + + + + +Material examined. + +1 male +( +ZRC 1991.9678 +), +Pulau Semakau + +; + +1 female +, +1.5 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0161 +), +Between Pulau Hantu +, +Semakau +and +Senang +, +1°13.437′N +103°44.521′E +‒ +1°13.526′N +103°44.634′E +, +Rectangular +dredge, sand, 10.3– + +6.4 m + +, + +13 March 2013 + + +; + +3 males +, +1.5–2.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0162 +), st. D05, +Henderson Shoal +, dredge, sand and mud, + +7 m + +, + +6 March 2012 + + +; +6 males +, +0.9–3.6 mm +, + +2 females +, +2.4 mm +, +2.7 mm +, 1 ovigerous female, +1.1 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0163 +), st. D06, between +Pulau Ubin +and +Pulau Tekong +, sand and mud, dredge, + +16 m + +, + +6 March 2012 + + +; + +1 male +, +2.4 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0164 +), st. D07, +1°25.189′N +103°58.630′E +, + +6 March 2012 + + +; + +1 male +, +2.2 mm +( +MZB +Cru +5206), st. TB106, +01°15.588′N +103°51.527′E +, dredge, + +17.2–18 m + +, + +21 March 2013 + + +; +3 males +, 2.9–4.0 mm, + +1 female +, +3.5 mm +, +Bedok Sea +, + +27 April 1982 + + +; +2 males +, +4.2–4.5 mm +, + +1 female +, +3.9 mm +, 1 ovigerous female, +4.2 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0165 +), +Chek +Jawa +, + +1 July 2009 + + +; + +1 male +, +1.5 mm +( +ZRC 2021.0166 +), st. DR327, between +Changi +beach and +Tekong +, +01°23.420′N +104°00.459′E +, sandy, muddy, + +24.4–26.7 m + +, + +19 March 2014 + + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Gulf of Aden, +India +, +Sri Lanka +, +Thailand +, +Singapore +, +Malaysia +, Arafura Sea, and Torres Strait; +6−27 m +, on sandy muddy substrates. + + + + +Remarks. +Most of the specimens examined in this study have the ocular peduncles being about 0.7 times as long as shield and having a small, not dilated cornea (about 0.3 times as long as ocular peduncles), the propodi of P2 and P3 devoid of dorsal spines and the carpi with a row of spines on the dorsal surface of P2 only, whereas on P3 only bearing a dorsodistal spine. According to the redescrition of the +holotype +by +McLaughlin & Clark (1997) +, the ocular peduncle is 0.8 times as long as the shield; the P2 and P3 propodi and carpi are all armed with a row of small spines. However, the present specimens agree with the +holotype +in every diagnostic aspect, such as the presence of a row of strong, outwardly directed spines on the ventral margin of the palm of the left cheliped, sometimes extending onto proximal margin parallel to the carpal articulation, the presence of a longitudinal row of strong curved spines on the upper margin of the palm, and the presence of a strong spine on the lower distal angle of the left cheliped carpus, and the presence of long spines interspersed with smaller spines on the lobes of telson. + + +One small specimen found in a scaphopod shell has a straight abdomen with almost symmetrical telson. This variation could be in response to the habitat structure, also seen in other hermit crab species using straight shaped carcinoecia ( +Lemaitre et al., 2018 +). The specimens of this study were collected from sandy, sandy-mud substrates. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/C6/3777C633A15DE77EFF17FCC13B5DF942.xml b/data/37/77/C6/3777C633A15DE77EFF17FCC13B5DF942.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d264f342294 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/C6/3777C633A15DE77EFF17FCC13B5DF942.xml @@ -0,0 +1,369 @@ + + + +A Taxonomic Study of the Scaly Cricket Family Mogoplistidae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Grylloidea) in Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Taewoo + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2928 + + +41 +48 + + + +journal article +46571 +10.5281/zenodo.203714 +1e678694-7fab-48f2-8029-00cd2b2fd432 +1175-5326 +203714 + + + + + + +Genus + +Ornebius +Guérin-Méneville, 1844 + + + + + + + +Type +species: + +Ornebius xanthopterus +Guérin-Méneville, 1844 + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Male with pronotum moderately protruded posteriorly; tegmen visible, mostly exposed from pronotum, color variable and remarkable; maxillary palpus moderately long, apical segment triangularly widened; male paraproct with elongate digital process directed caudodorsally; ovipositor straight, needle-shaped. + + +2 +. + + +Ornebius bimaculatus +( +Shiraki, 1930 +) + + +( +Table 2 +, +Figs. 2 +, +5 +, +8 +, +11 +, +14 +, +17 +) + + + + + +Liphoplus bimaculatus +Shiraki, 1930 + +. Insecta Matsumurana, 4(4): 191, +Fig. 5 +. “ +Formosa +: Kwashoto.” +Lectotype +3 in +National +Taiwan +University, Taipei, +Taiwan +. + + + + + +Material examined ( +18 specimens +). <Jeju-do> + +13, Marado Island Namjeju-gun, +24 Sep 2008 +, Kim Hwa-Jung; 6311Ƥ, ibid., +16 Oct 2008 +, Kim Tae-Woo. + + + + + +Description. +General + +. Body coloration light gray, head and pronotum orange; tegmina short, orange yellow; cercal end whitish with subapical dark annulation. +Head +. Head depressed, longer than height; eyes small, widely separated, interocular distance four times wider than horizontal diameter of an eye; antennal scape as long as wide, as wide as horizontal diameter of an eye; fastigium of vertex as wide as horizontal diameter of an antennal socket; clypeus protruding anteriorly, higher than wide in anterior view, without median longitudinal furrow; maxillary palpus with five segments, the ratio of segments being 1:1.2:2.4:2:2.4 from base to apex. +Thorax +. Pronotum 1.5 times longer than wide in dorsal view, 1.7 times longer than head, 2.5 times longer than tegmina; anterior margin truncated, posterior margin widely rounded, wider than anterior one; female pronotum as long as wide in dorsal view, 1.2 times longer than head. +Wings +. Tegmina micropterous, not exceeding one-quarter of abdomen, posterior margin widely round; tegminal base covered by posterior margin of pronotum; posterior outer margin of tegmen with a black spot; right tegmen with two harp veins, two chordal veins; speculum ovate, not divided, 1.2 times wider than long; female lacks tegmina and wings. +Legs +. Fore tibia with a small inner tympanum; hind femur three times longer than middle femur; middle tarsomeres large, rounded, depressed; hind tibiae with numerous small spinules on inner and outer dorsal margins; largest inner apical spur as long as a half of basitarsus; hind basitarsus two times longer than remaining two tarsomeres combined length, with small spinules on both sides; inner apical spur as long as last tarsomere. +Abdomen +. Cerci 1.5 times longer than hind femur, with white and black terminal annulation; male supra-anal plate with smoothly convex hind margin, with short bristle developed on dorsal area; paraproct with elongate goose-neck shaped process, smooth without hairs; female subgenital plate with widely round hind margin, apex deeply incised, deeper than width. +Ovipositor +. Ovipositor shiny brown, straight, needleshaped, as long as hind femora; apex subapically swollen, without serration; dorsal valves with 5~6 ventral bristles. +Distribution. +Marado Island, +Korea +(new record), +Japan +, +China +, +Taiwan +, and Hawaii (introduced; +Otte, 1994 +). + + +3 +. + + +Ornebius kanetataki +( +Matsumura, 1904 +) + + +( +Table 2 +, +Figs. 3 +, +6 +, +9 +, +12 +, +15 +, +18 +) + + + + + +Ectatoderus kanetataki +Matsumura, 1904 + +. Thousand Insects of +Japan +, 1: 131, pl. 6, +Fig. 1 +. “ +Japan +: Mt. Ibuki.” +Lectotype +3 in +Hokkaido University, Sapporo, +Japan +. + + + + +Liphoplus kanetaki + +[misspelling]: + +Ju, 1969 +: 20 + +. + + + + + +Ornebius kanetataki +: + +Choo and Choi, 1983 +: 49 + + +; + +Kwon and Huh, 1994 +: 50 + +; + +Park and Paik, 1995 +: 293 + +; + + +Kwon +et al +. 1996 + +: 104 + +; + +Storozhenko and Paik, 2007 +: 119 + +; + + +Paik +et al +. 2009 + +: 33 + +; + + +Paek +et al +. 2010 + +: 35 + +; + + +Paik +et al +. 2010 + +: 41 + +. + + + + + + +Material examined ( +19 specimens +). <Gyeonggi-do> + +1Ƥ, Mt. Bukhansan Eupyeong-gu Seoul, +3 Oct 2003 +, Kim Tae-Woo; 13, Sindo Island Bukdo-myeon Ongjin-gun Incheon, +26 Aug–2 Sep 2007 +(rearing), Kim Tae-Woo; +<Chungcheongnam-do> +1Ƥ, Sambong Beach Anmyeondo Island Taean, +8 Sep 2005 +, Kim Tae-Woo; +<Gyeongsangnam-do> +1Ƥ, Gadeok-ri Geumseong-myeon Hadong-gun, +19 Sep 1998 +, An NY; 1Ƥ, ibid., +27 Sep 2003 +, Park Jung-Seok; 13, Baechun-ri Chukdong-myeon Sacheon, +18 Sep 2010 +, Paik Yu-Hyeon; +<Jeollanam-do> +1Ƥ, Seomjingang Riverbed Toji-myeon Gurye-gun, +29 Sep 2001 +, Kim Tae-Woo; 2Ƥ, Hongdo Island Heuksan-myeon Sinan-gun, +7 Oct 1999 +, An Seung-Lak; +<Jeju-do> +13, Jungmun Seoguipo-si, +16 Jan 2003 +, Kim Tae-Woo; 131Ƥ, Jejudo Island, +29 Oct 2007 +, Seong Ki-Soo; 13 (sweeping), Wolchulbong, +5 Oct 2003 +, Park Sang-Hyeon; 333Ƥ, Dongbaekdongsan Seonheul-ri Jocheon-eup Bukjeju-gun, +16 Oct 2008 +, Kim Tae-Woo. + + + + + +Description. +General + +. Body grayish brown; tegmina short, dark, shiny gray. +Head +. Head depressed, longer than height; eyes small, widely separated, interocular distance four times wider than horizontal diameter of one eye; antennal scape as long as wide, as wide as horizontal diameter of an antennal socket; fastigium of vertex 1.2 times wider than horizontal diameter of an antennal socket; clypeus protruding anteriorly, higher than wide in anterior view, with a median longitudinal furrow; maxillary palpus with five segments, the ratio of segments being 1:1.2:2.4:2:2 from base to apex. +Thorax +. Pronotum 1.5 times longer than wide in dorsal view, two times longer than head, 1.2 times longer than tegmen; anterior margin truncated narrowly, but posterior margin widely rounded, wider than anterior one; whitish rim on hind margin; female pronotum as long as wide in dorsal view, 1.2 times longer than head. +Wings +. Tegmina micropterous, not exceeding one-half of abdomen, posterior margin rounded; tegminal base covered by posterior margin of pronotum; color mostly dark brown, only basal area transparent. Right tegmen with two harp veins, two chordal veins; speculum trapezoidal, not divided, 1.5 times wider than long; female lacks tegmina and wings. +Legs +. Fore tibia with a small inner tympanum; hind femur three times longer than middle femur; middle tarsomeres small, rounded, depressed; hind tibia with numerous small spinules on inner and outer sides; largest inner apical spur as long as one-third of basitarsus; hind basitarsus 2.2 times longer than remaining two tarsomeres combined length; small spinules present on both sides; inner apical spur as long as last tarsomere. +Abdomen +. Cerci 1.1 times longer than hind femur, concolorous with body, without annulation; male supra-anal plate with a pair of trapezoidal lobes, hind margin with dorsal hairs; paraproct with thick and short process, right angled, with sparse hairs; female subgenital plate roundly triangular, shorter than basal width; its posterior margin with narrowly incised apex, wider than depth. +Ovipositor +. Ovipositor shiny brown, almost straight, needle-shaped, shorter than hind femora; apex subapically swollen, without serration; dorsal valves with 6~7 ventral bristles. + + + + +Distribution. +Korea +, +Japan +, +China +, +Taiwan +. + + + +TABLE 2. +Measurements of the Korean +Mogoplistidae +(length in mm). + + +Species Body Pronotum Tegmen Hindfemur Ovipositor + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/C6/3777C633A15EE77CFF17FE883B97FDC3.xml b/data/37/77/C6/3777C633A15EE77CFF17FE883B97FDC3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4a02b3d0136 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/C6/3777C633A15EE77CFF17FE883B97FDC3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + +A Taxonomic Study of the Scaly Cricket Family Mogoplistidae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Grylloidea) in Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Taewoo + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2928 + + +41 +48 + + + +journal article +46571 +10.5281/zenodo.203714 +1e678694-7fab-48f2-8029-00cd2b2fd432 +1175-5326 +203714 + + + + + + +Key to the species of +Mogoplistidae +in +Korea + + + + + + + + +1. Male tegmina invisible, hidden under pronotum, which strongly protrudes backwards ( +Fig. 1 +); maxillary palpus slender, its apical segment moderately widened ( +Fig. 4 +); ovipositor thick, slightly recurved ( +Fig. 16 +)........ + +Ectatoderus tamna + + +sp. nov. + + + + + +- Male tegmina visible, leaving from the pronotum, which protrudes backwards moderately; maxillary palpus thick, its apical segment triangularly widened ( +Figs. 5, 6 +); ovipositor slender and straight ( +Figs. 17, 18 +).............................. 2 + + + + + + +2. Male tegmina bright orange with a pair of black spots ( +Figs. 2 +, +8 +); cerci with terminal annulation; female subgenital plate deeply notched, deeper than wide ( +Fig. 14 +)................................................ + +Ornebius bimaculatus + + + + + +- Male tegmina dark gray without maculation ( +Figs. 3 +, +9 +); cerci concolorous, without annulation; female subgenital plate weakly notched, wider than deep ( +Fig. 15 +)......................................................... + +Ornebius kanetataki + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/C6/3777C633A15EE77FFF17FD063B06FD12.xml b/data/37/77/C6/3777C633A15EE77FFF17FD063B06FD12.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bc8df7a6b9b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/C6/3777C633A15EE77FFF17FD063B06FD12.xml @@ -0,0 +1,230 @@ + + + +A Taxonomic Study of the Scaly Cricket Family Mogoplistidae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Grylloidea) in Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Taewoo + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2928 + + +41 +48 + + + +journal article +46571 +10.5281/zenodo.203714 +1e678694-7fab-48f2-8029-00cd2b2fd432 +1175-5326 +203714 + + + + + + +Genus + +Ectatoderus +Guérin-Méneville, 1849 + + + + + + + +Type +species: + +Ectatoderus nigriventris +Guérin-Méneville, 1849 + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Male with pronotum somewhat widened, protruding posteriorly; tegmen short squamiform, almost invisible, concealed under elongate pronotum; maxillary palpus long and slender, its apical segment moderately widened; male paraproct with short, right-angled process; ovipositor curved upward slightly. + + +1 +. + + +Ectatoderus tamna + +sp + +. +nov +. + + +( +Tables 1 +, +2 +, +Figs. 1 +, +4 +, +7 +, +10 +, +13 +, +16 +) + + + + + +Material examined ( +13 specimens +). <Jeju-do> < +Holotype +> + +13, Dongbaekdongsan Seonheul-ri Jocheon-eup Bukjeju-gun, +16 Oct 2008 +, Kim Tae-Woo; + +< +Paratypes +> + +235Ƥ, ibid., +16 Oct 2008 +, Kim Tae-Woo; 132Ƥ, Mt. Sanbangsan Sagye-ri Andeok-myeon Namjeju-gun, +14 Aug–1 Sep 2004 +(rearing), Kim Jeong-Kyu and Kim Tae-Woo; 1Ƥ, Bijarim Forest Gujoa-eup Bukjeju-gun, +21 Aug 2000 +, Sohn Jae-Chun; 13 (last instar), Andeokgyegok Valley Gamsan-ri Andeok-myeon Namjeju-gun, +13 Aug 2004 +, Kim Jeong-Kyu and Kim Tae-Woo. + + + + + +Description. +General + +. Whole body dark gray, pronotum reddish gray, appendages more maculated; at a glimpse, looks like an immature nymph due to the invisible tegmina hidden under the pronotum. +Head +. Head small and round, longer than height; eyes small, widely separated, interocular distance 4.2 times wider than the horizontal diameter of one eye; antennal scape as long as wide, as wide as the horizontal diameter of an antennal socket; fastigium of vertex 1.2 times wider than the horizontal diameter of an antennal socket; clypeus protruding anteriorly, higher than wide in anterior view, with median longitudinal furrow; maxillary palpus with five segments, the ratio of segments being 1:1:2:1.7:2 from base to apex. +Thorax +. Pronotum 1.5 times longer than wide in dorsal view, 2.5 times longer than head; anterior margin truncated, but posterior margin widely rounded, wider than anterior one; female pronotum as long as wide in dorsal view, 1.5 times longer than head. +Wings +. Tegmina micropterous, but invisible, almost hidden under pronotum, its hind margin rounded with pubescence; most venations vestigial, only three basic cubitus veins, media and radius hardly perceived; chordal veins and speculum obviously undeveloped; transparent, only lateral field and apical area weakly darkened; female without tegmina and wings. +Legs +. Fore tibia with a small, round, hardly discernable inner tympanum; hind femur three times longer than middle femur; middle tarsomeres small, rounded, depressed; hind tibia with numerous small spinules on inner and outer dorsal margins; largest inner apical spur as long as one-third of basitarsus; hind basitarsus three times longer than combined length of remaining two tarsomeres, with small spinules on both sides; inner apical spur as long as last tarsomere. +Abdomen +. Cercus shorter than hind femur, concolorous with body, without bright annulation; male supra-anal plate with smoothly curvate hind margin, its dorsal area with developed short hairs; paraproct with right-angled process, as long as basal width, along its margin with hairs; female subgenital plate roundly triangular, shorter than basal width, hind margin narrowly incised at apex, as wide as deep. +Ovipositor +. Ovipositor shiny brown, gently recurved, slightly shorter than hind femora; apex subapically swollen, without serration; dorsal valves with 3~4 ventral bristles. + + + + +Distribution. +Korea +, Jejudo Island. + + + + +Etymology. +‘ + +tamna + +’ refers to an earlier name for Jejudo Island, which was used for many centuries in ancient +Korea +. + + + + +Remarks. +This species is similar to + +Ectatoderus annulipedus +( +Shiraki, 1911 +) + +from +Taiwan +, but newly characterized, as shown in +Table 1 +, using the characters from +Yang and Yen (2001a) +. + + + +TABLE 1. +Character differences between + +E +. +tamna + + +sp. nov. + +and + +E +. +annulipedus + +. + + + +Character + +E +. +tamna + + +sp. nov. + + +E +. +annulipedus + + + +Body size smaller (mean +7.5 mm +in males) larger (mean +9.6 mm +in males) Tegmina mostly transparent, venation vestigial shiny black, venation completed Cerci coloration gray, same color as body yellow + +Male paraproct as long as basal width and hairy shorter than basal width and smooth + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/77/C6/3777C633A15FE77CFF17F8A83A5BFF41.xml b/data/37/77/C6/3777C633A15FE77CFF17F8A83A5BFF41.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cde859c41aa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/77/C6/3777C633A15FE77CFF17F8A83A5BFF41.xml @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ + + + +A Taxonomic Study of the Scaly Cricket Family Mogoplistidae (Orthoptera: Ensifera: Grylloidea) in Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Taewoo + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2928 + + +41 +48 + + + +journal article +46571 +10.5281/zenodo.203714 +1e678694-7fab-48f2-8029-00cd2b2fd432 +1175-5326 +203714 + + + + + + +Family +Mogoplistidae + + + + + + +Diagnosis. +Body slender, flat, depressed, always covered with delicate fine scales; head short, the clypeus extending onto the dorsum of the head; the entire rostrum composed of the clypeus; pronotum longer than wide, especially elongate in males compared to females; male micropterous, but female always apterous; fore tibia with only inner tympanum; hind tibia with dorsal spinules, but without movable large spines; middle tarsomeres with developed pulvillus; male phallic complex mostly membranous; ovipositor needle-shaped. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/78/4A/37784A0762CC8E35254E4ADEC5A4C6DA.xml b/data/37/78/4A/37784A0762CC8E35254E4ADEC5A4C6DA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8a792e81aab --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/78/4A/37784A0762CC8E35254E4ADEC5A4C6DA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Braconidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Mark R. + + + +Author + +Godfray, H. Charles J. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8151 +8151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 +1314-2828--8151 + + + + +Chelonus Jurine, 1801 + + + + +Anomala +von Block, 1799 nom. ob. + + +DAVISANIA +La Munyon, 1877 + + +ARICHELONUS +Viereck, 1913 + + +MEGACHELONUS +Baker, 1926 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/78/4D/37784DC39BC854AC8E63993C1D842142.xml b/data/37/78/4D/37784DC39BC854AC8E63993C1D842142.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9408ff80fd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/78/4D/37784DC39BC854AC8E63993C1D842142.xml @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + +Nomenclatural changes in Coleus and Plectranthus (Lamiaceae): a tale of more than two genera + + + +Author + +Paton, Alan J. + + + +Author + +Mwanyambo, Montfort + + + +Author + +Govaerts, Rafael H. A. + + + +Author + +Smitha, Kokkaraniyil + + + +Author + +Suddee, Somran + + + +Author + +Phillipson, Peter B. + + + +Author + +Wilson, Trevor C. + + + +Author + +Forster, Paul I. + + + +Author + +Culham, Alastair + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2019 + +129 + + +1 +158 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.129.34988 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.129.34988 +1314-2003-129-1 +BF57C6B3C3065AEE9B4B3D47189C908F +3382366 + + + + + +Coleus petiolatissimus Briq., +Mem +. Soc. Bot. France 8: 291. 1917 + + + + + +Coleus petiolatissimus +Briq., +Mem +. Soc. Bot. France 8: 291. 1917. Type: Central African Republic (Bangui), 16 Aug. 1902, Chevalier 5214 bis. (holotype: P). + + + +Distribution. +Central African Republic. + + +Notes. + +Related to + +P. bojeri + +. Complex in need of revision. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/78/68/377868A3BDC658F9A5D72F044692E826.xml b/data/37/78/68/377868A3BDC658F9A5D72F044692E826.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8c84bee3ece --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/78/68/377868A3BDC658F9A5D72F044692E826.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Floristic inventory and distribution characteristics of algific talus slopes in a specific area of forest biodiversity in South Korea + + + +Author + +Lee, Jong-Won +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-8396 +Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Yun, Ho-Geun +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Hwang, Tae Young +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Kyungmin +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Jung, Se-Hoon +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +An, Jong Bin +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea +ajb8825@korea.kr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-12-18 + + +11 + + +113952 +113952 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 +1314-2828-11-e113952 +5B963235F71B550FA1E3BC1F0E590B10 + + + + +Celastrus flagellaris Rupr., 1857 + + + +Distribution +South Russian Far East to North China and Korea, Central & South Japan + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/79/26/37792667803843425DBD2D9722499041.xml b/data/37/79/26/37792667803843425DBD2D9722499041.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..042963fbf76 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/79/26/37792667803843425DBD2D9722499041.xml @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Dichrogaster schimitscheki (Fahringer, 1935) + + + + +Phygadeuon schimitscheki +Fahringer, 1935 + + +nigrithorax +Horstmann, 1976 + + + +Distribution +England + + +Notes + +added by +Townes (1983) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/79/73/377973F519DF3FB71024888D927A2486.xml b/data/37/79/73/377973F519DF3FB71024888D927A2486.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..18463996cba --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/79/73/377973F519DF3FB71024888D927A2486.xml @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ + + + +New species of Nipponoserica and Paraserica from China (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sericini) + + + +Author + +Liu, Wan-Gang + + + +Author + +Fabrizi, Silvia + + + +Author + +Yang, Xingke + + + +Author + +Bai, Ming + + + +Author + +Ahrens, Dirk + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +721 + + +65 +91 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.721.13918 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.721.13918 +1313-2970-721-65 +11150F44A5F043A49FC194A90AEB07C1 + + + + +Nipponoserica koltzei (Reitter, 1897) +Figure 4 + + + + +Serica koltzei +Reitter, 1897: 214. + + +Nipponoserica koltzei +: +Nomura 1973 +: 139; Nikolaev 2002: 98; +Ahrens 2004b +: 7. + + +Pseudoserica koltzei +: Nikolaev 1980: 40. + + +Nipponoserica opacicarina +Kim & Kim, 2003: 76; syn by +Ahrens 2007 +: 9. + + + +Additional material examined. + +2 ex. "China, W Henan, 9.VII.2006 Funiu Shan, +33°42'N +, +112°15'E +Shirenshan 1400-1900m, Jaroslav Turna leg. "(ZFMK), 17 ex. "China, W Henan, 6-7.VII.2006 Funiu Shan, +33°31'N +, +111°56'E +Baotianman, 1500-1750m, Jaroslav Turna leg." (ZFMK), 1 ex. "China-Shaanxi, SW Tsinling Mts., Taiping vill., +33°33'N +, +106°43'E +, June 2000, 1500-2000m, Siniaev & Plutenko leg." (CPPB), 1 ex. "China-Shaanxi, Tsinling Mts., Houzhenzi vill., +33°53'N +, +107°49'E +, June-Juli 2000, 1500m, Siniaev & Plutenko leg." (CPPB), 2 ex. "China, 1000-1300m, Shaanxi, Qinling mts., Xunyangba (6km E) 23.v.-13.vi.1998 J.H. Marshal leg." (CPPB), 1 ex. "China, W Henan, 7.-8.VII.2007, Funju Shan, N33°42', E112°15', Shirenshan, 1500m, leg. Jaroslav Turna" (ZFMK), 1 ♂ "Bayi, Xizang, No.255" (IZAS), 1 ♂ +"Ha'erbin +, 16.VI.1960" (IZAS), 3 ♂♂ "Getiaopa, Neixiang, Henan, 15.VII.1998, 600m, leg. Zhang Youwei" (IZAS). + + + +Distribution. + +The species was known from South Korea, and Far East of Russia, as well as Gansu and Hubei provinces of China ( +Ahrens and Bezdek 2016 +). It is now recorded for the first time from Henan, Shaanxi, and Xizang provinces of China. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/79/9F/37799F0D90FF5348F28D5655CC3F91D8.xml b/data/37/79/9F/37799F0D90FF5348F28D5655CC3F91D8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8c4780b5a03 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/79/9F/37799F0D90FF5348F28D5655CC3F91D8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Enytus neoapostata (Horstmann, 1969) + + + + +Diadegma neoapostata +Horstmann, 1969 + + +neapostatus +misspelling + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/79/CA/3779CA4BAF5E345BD8E68BE20B02B07B.xml b/data/37/79/CA/3779CA4BAF5E345BD8E68BE20B02B07B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3fe999c757c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/79/CA/3779CA4BAF5E345BD8E68BE20B02B07B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Type material of Platyhelminthes (Monogenoidea) housed in the Helminthological Collection of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute / FIOCRUZ (CHIOC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 1979 to 2016 + + + +Author + +Lopes, Daniela A. + + + +Author + +Mainenti, Adriana + + + +Author + +Sanches, Magda + + + +Author + +Knoff, Marcelo + + + +Author + +Gomes, Delir Correa + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +616 + + +1 +75 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.616.8481 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.616.8481 +1313-2970-616-1 +5A8C55011C4A458091CA41FFE5879A56 +5A8C55011C4A458091CA41FFE5879A56 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Dactylogyridea Dactylogyridae + + + +* +Protorhinoxenus prochilodi Domingues & Boeger, 2002 + + + +Type host. + +Prochilodus lineatus + + + +Infection site. +Gill filaments. + + +Type locality. + +Brazil, +Parana +State, metropolitan area of Curitiba, Campina Grande do Sul, reservoir of +Capivari-Cachoeira +. + + + +Holotype. +CHIOC 34542. + + +Paratype. +CHIOC 34543. + + +Remarks. +Other paratypes deposited in the collections of INPA and IPCR. + + +Reference. + +Domingues and Boeger (2002) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D65284BFE555E31719BFB1F.xml b/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D65284BFE555E31719BFB1F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7445644c732 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D65284BFE555E31719BFB1F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,229 @@ + + + +Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea) + + + +Author + +Angus, Robert B. +Division of Life Sciences (Insects), Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, UK; e-mail: r. angus @ royalholloway. ac. uk + + + +Author + +Jia, Fenglong +Museum of Biology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; e-mail: lssjϐl @ mail. sysu. edu. cn + + + +Author + +Chen, Zhen-ning +Biology and Geography School, Qinghai Normal University, Wusi West Road 38 #, 810000, Xining, Qinghai Province, China; e-mail: 149470880 @ qq. com + + + +Author + +Zhang, Ying +Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; e-mail: 344280438 @ qq. com + + + +Author + +Vondráček, Dominik +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ- 193 00 Praha 9 - Horní Počernice, Czech Republic; e-mail: mfikacek @ gmail. com + + + +Author + +Fikáček, Martin +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ- 193 00 Praha 9 - Horní Počernice, Czech Republic; e-mail: mfikacek @ gmail. com + + + +Author + +Sw, London +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com + +text + + +Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae + + +2016 + +2016-07-15 + + +56 + + +1 + + +109 +148 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.5311784 +0374-1036 +5311784 +15CF0A9E-44F3-492B-88F7-A7922EF9F73A + + + + + + + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola + + + + + + + +Larval material examined +( +5 larvae +). + +1 first instar larva ( +NMPC +, DNA voucher +MF660 +): + +CHINA +: +QINGHAI +: + +Golo +, +Huamuxia +, +Zuimatan +, roadside pool, +35°19′52″N +, +99°03′57″E +, + +4141 m + +, + +7.vi.2013 + +, +R. B.Angus +, +F. L. Jia +& +Y. Zhang +lgt + +.; + +4 first instar larvae (BMNH): same label data. All larvae were reared from the single egg case (deposited in BMNH) laid by a field-collected female, association with adults from the same locality was confirmed by the +cox1 +sequence data + +. + + +Egg case +( +Fig. 8e +). Consisting of an egg-bag surmounted by a thin trailing mast which takes the form of a long narrow tube, thus corresponding to +Type +4 egg +case of + +ANGUS +(1992) + +. The egg case was placed in the sand at the water’s edge in the aquarium housing the beetles, and has sand grains adhering to the egg-bag. A similar egg case was observed in the ground at the water’s edge in the Zuimatan locality where the beetles were collected + + + + +Larva. General morphology +(only characters different from + +H. yangae + +are mentioned). Body ( +Fig. 9c +) elongate, slender, almost parallel-sided. Body length ca. +2.9 mm +. +Head +width +0.43–0.46 mm +(n = 5). Parietale ( +Figs 12a–b +) with numerous cuticular spines dorsally and laterally, ventral face smooth. Frontoclypeus ( +Fig. 12e +) with large bulged asymmetrical nasale bearing single median tooth, and large slightly asymmetrical epistomal lobes overlapping nasale. Gular suture absent, posterior tentorial pits minute, situated anteromesally ( +Figs 8a–b +). +Mandibles +( +Figs 13c–d +) slightly asymmetrical, with falcate apical portion. Retinaculum with two teeth; distal tooth large, bearing dense tuft of long cuticular spines; basal tooth small, with numerous cuticular spines in left mandible and few projections in right one. Basal inner face projecting into a small lobe, with a basal field of fine spine-like cuticular projections. +Maxilla +( +Figs 14e–f +). Stipes ca. as long as palpifer, sinuate laterally, mesal face with a series of irregular cuticular spines, lateral face with small blunt cuticular spines; palpifer slightly longer than stipes. +Labium +( +Figs 13i–j +). Submentum completely fused with parietale, submental suture absent. Mentum without cuticular spines on dorsal surface. +Thorax +. Legs ( +Fig. 15d +) very long, 5-segmented; trochanter ca. half as long as femur; tibiotarsus cylindrical, slightly longer than trochanter and femur combined. Claw ca. as long as tibiotarsus, slightly bent ventrad. +Abdomen +( +8g +–h, 15h). Segments 1–8 each with a pair of long finger-like projections laterally below spiracles, bearing lateral sclerite on apex; each projection with trachea connected to tracheal branch connecting main tracheal trunk with spiracle lying above base of the particular projection. + + + +Chaetotaxy. +Head. + +Frontal pores FR2 closer to each other than setae FR3; setae FR8 widely separated from each other; parietal setae PA7, PA12, and PA14 much longer than in + +L. yangae + +. Labial setae LA3 very long. Maxillary setae +MX +5 and +MX +6 of the same length, both rather long; setae +MX +8–11 very long, situated along the whole length of stipes; apical maxillary palpomere with multiple additional digitiform sensilla. +Abdomen +with lateral abdominal sclerite (situated on the top of tracheal gill) with three setae. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D6B284AFE6F587A701AFAFF.xml b/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D6B284AFE6F587A701AFAFF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e106ee90277 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D6B284AFE6F587A701AFAFF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,840 @@ + + + +Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea) + + + +Author + +Angus, Robert B. +Division of Life Sciences (Insects), Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, UK; e-mail: r. angus @ royalholloway. ac. uk + + + +Author + +Jia, Fenglong +Museum of Biology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; e-mail: lssjϐl @ mail. sysu. edu. cn + + + +Author + +Chen, Zhen-ning +Biology and Geography School, Qinghai Normal University, Wusi West Road 38 #, 810000, Xining, Qinghai Province, China; e-mail: 149470880 @ qq. com + + + +Author + +Zhang, Ying +Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; e-mail: 344280438 @ qq. com + + + +Author + +Vondráček, Dominik +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ- 193 00 Praha 9 - Horní Počernice, Czech Republic; e-mail: mfikacek @ gmail. com + + + +Author + +Fikáček, Martin +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ- 193 00 Praha 9 - Horní Počernice, Czech Republic; e-mail: mfikacek @ gmail. com + + + +Author + +Sw, London +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com + +text + + +Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae + + +2016 + +2016-07-15 + + +56 + + +1 + + +109 +148 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.5311784 +0374-1036 +5311784 +15CF0A9E-44F3-492B-88F7-A7922EF9F73A + + + + + + + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs 8c–d, f, i–j +; +9b +; +10 +; +12c–d +; +13b, f, g–h +; +14e–f +) + + + + +Larval material examined +( +5 larvae +). + +1 first instar larva ( +NMPC +, DNA voucher +MF666 +): + +CHINA +: +QINGHAI +: + +Golo +, +Maduo +, roadside pools near +Yematan +, 34°40′47″″N 99°03′57″″E, + +4240 m +a.s.l. + +, + +8.vi.2013 + +, +R. B. Angus +, +F. L. Jia +& +Y. Zhang +lgt + +.; + +4 first instar larvae (BMNH): same label data. All larvae were reared from the single egg case (deposited in BMNH) laid by the field-collected female, association with adults from the same locality was confirmed by the +cox1 +sequence data + +. + + +Egg case +( +Fig. 8f +). + +Consisting of an egg-bag surmounted by a thin trailing mast which takes the form of a long narrow tube, thus corresponding to +Type +4 egg +case of + +ANGUS +(1992) + + +; it is similar to that of + +H. lamicola + +, but with a shorter mast which may represent individual variation. +Larva. General morphology. +Body ( +Fig. 9b +) elongate, slender, almost parallel-sided. Body length (without urogomphi) ca. 3.0 mm. Head ( +Figs 8c–d +) subquadrate in shape, ca. 1.15× wider than long, prognathous, with occipital foramen directing posteriorly. + + + + +Head +width +0.43–0.47 mm +(n = 5). Parietale with numerous cuticular spines dorsally, laterally and ventrally. Frontal lines V-shaped, arising posteriorly of antennal socket and reaching posterior margin of head capsule, nearly straight; coronal line absent. Antennal sockets situated on the laterodorsal portion of head. Frontoclypeus ( +Fig. 12c +) with small asymmetrical + + +◄Fig. 7. Distribution and habitats of + +Lihelophorus + +species. a – known distribution of + +Lihelophorus + +species based on examined specimens. Examples of habitats (see the letters in Fig. 7a for geographic position of each locality): b – +Qinghai +: Golo, Maduo, roadside pools on river flats, +4290 m +(habitat of + +H. ser + +and + +H. yangae + +sp. nov. +); c – +Qinghai +: Golo, Huamuxia, Zuimatan, roadside pool, +4141 m +(habitat of + +H. lamicola + +, + +H. ser + +and + +H. yangae + +sp. nov. +); d – +Xizang +: Gongbujiangda, +4155 m +(habitat of + +H. yangae + +sp. nov. +); e – +Xizang +: E Nyainqentanglha Feng, eastern slope of Lha Tsu valley, +5000–5350 m +(habitat of + +H. ser + +); f – +Gansu +: Xiahe env., +2940 m +(habitat of + +H. ser + +); g – +Xizang +: Dangxiong, Yangbajing town, +4320 m +(habitat of + +H. yangae + +sp. nov. +). + + +nasale bearing single median tooth, and large symmetrical epistomal lobes overlapping nasale, well-sclerotized including laterally. Six small stemmata situated on anterolateral portion of parietale, widely separated from each other. Gular suture absent, posterior tentorial pits distinct, situated anteromesally. Cervical sclerites absent. Antenna ( +Fig. 13f +) 3-segmented, long and rather stout. Scape ca. as long as pedicel, pedicel slightly widened distally, flagellum slightly shorter than scape. + + + +Fig. 8. Immature stages of + +Lihelophorus + +. a–d – head and prothorax of first instar larvae: a–b – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(a – dorsal; b – ventral); c–d – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +(c – dorsal; d – ventral). e–f – egg cases: e – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +; f – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +; g–j – abdomen with spiracles containing air bubbles: g–h – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(g – tracheal gills and its tracheal system; h – detail of tracheal branching around abdominal spiracle); i–j – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +(i – detail of tracheal system around abdominal spiracles; j – tracheal system of abdomen). Abbreviations: sp – spiracle; trg – tracheal gill. + + + +Mandibles +( +Fig. 13b +) symmetrical, with falcate apical portion. Retinaculum with two teeth; distal tooth large, bearing dense tuft of cuticular spines; basal tooth small, lacking cuticular projections. Basal inner face not projecting, with a basal field of fine spine-like cuticular projections. + + +Maxilla +( +Figs 14e–f +) 6-segmented (including cardo), slightly longer than antenna. Cardo rather small, situated laterally, and associated with two additional sclerites lying between cardo and labium. Stipes ca. as long as palpifer, subcylindrical; palpifer completely sclerotized, mesally with a long well-sclerotized finger-like galea which has an additional ring-like sclerite basally. Maxillary palpus with 3 segments, ca. as long as palpifer; palpomere 1 ca. half as long palpomere 2 and 3 each. + + +Labium +( + +Figs +13g +–h + +). Submentum large, trapezoid, fused with parietale, submental suture indistinct. Mentum short, ca. as long as wide, with cuticular spines on dorsal surface. Prementum V-shaped, ligula absent. Labial palpus 2-segmented, with basal palpomere ca. 2× shorter than distal palpomere. + + +Thorax. +Prothorax ca. as wide as head capsule. Proscutum, meso- and metanotum ( +Fig. 15f +) each formed by a large plate subdivided mesally by a sagittal line. Ventral portion of prothorax ( +Fig. 8d +) with a pair of small widely isolated presternal sclerites, each articulating posterolaterally with a precoxal sclerite which connects presternum with coxal articulation; remaining parts largely membranous. Mesothorax with two pleural sclerites: the anterior one bulge-like bearing spiracle, the posterior rounded and flat. Legs long, clearly visible in dorsal view, all pairs similar in shape. Leg 5-segmented ( +Figs 15b–c +); all pairs of coxae well separated from each other, procoxae slightly closer to each other than meso- and metacoxae; trochanter ca. half as long as femur, rather firmly joined with femur; tibiotarsus cylindrical, ca. as long as trochanter and femur combined. Claw ca. as long as tibiotarsus, slightly bent ventrad. + + + +Fig.9.Association of reared larvae and field-collected adults of + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) + +based on +cox1 +sequences. a – Bayesian inference of newly obtained and available GenBank sequences; b–c – habitus of reared larvae (b – + +H. yangae + +sp. nov. +; c – + +H. lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +). + + + +Abdomen +( +Figs 9b +, +15e–f, g +) with 9 well developed segments, not subdivided into folds. Segments 1–8 each with a pair of large central (ʻdorsal scleritesʼ sensu + +ANGUS +1992 + +) and smaller lateral sclerites (ʻdorsolateral scleritesʼ sensu + +ANGUS +1992 + +); dorsally, one small sclerite below spiracle (ʻlateral scleriteʼ sensu + +ANGUS +1992 + +), and transverse series of three small sclerites ventrally; spiracle is situated in membranose area. Segment 9 with large entire sclerite dorsally; bearing a pair of long three-segmented urogomphi ( +Fig. 15j +). Spiracular atrium not developed. + + + +Primary chaetotaxy. +Head. + +Frontale with 44 sensilla ( +Figs 10b +, +12c +). Central part with three pairs of sensilla diverging posteriad, small seta FR1 situated at midlength near frontal line, pore FR2 and small seta FR3 close to each other and situated more anteromesally. Lateral portions posterior to antennal socket each with two setae and one pore: short seta FR5 situated close to frontal line, long seta FR6 anteromesally of the latter, and pore FR4 even more mesally. Inner part of antennal socket with a small seta FR7, central portion of frontale between antennae with two pairs of small setae (FR8–9) converging anteriad. Nasale with a pair of short stout setae mesally at sides of median tooth and a sensillum situated on based on epistomal lobe on each side (gFR1), pores FR15 absent. Each epistomal lobe with a group of eight setae (gFR2) situated on anterior margin, all setae lanceolate, with pilose inner margin; long seta FR12, shorter seta FR10 and a pore FR14 situated on epistomal lobe anteromesally of antennal socket, pores FR11 and FR13 seta FR9 and anterior margin of head. Parietale with 29 sensilla each ( +Fig. 10 +). Dorsal face with posterior portion bearing a row of four short setae and one pore (PA1–5) sublaterally, and a pore (PA6) and a short seta (PA7) mesally. Dorsomesal portion with one moderately long seta (PA12) and one very long seta (PA8), ocular area with one pore (PA10) and one seta (PA11) dorsally, and one short seta (PA9) between stemmata of anterior row, and one seta (PA16) ventrally. Lateral portion with a pore (PA30) posteriorly, three long setae (PA13–14 and PA18) situated in posterior half and two pores (PA15 and PA17) situated more anteriorly. Anterior margin laterally with a pore (PA19) dorsally, long seta (PA20) and short seta (PA21) laterally, and three pores (PA23–25) ventrally; sensilla PA22 either absent, or present as a pore anteriorly of PA21. Ventral portion with four sensilla: short seta PA26 anteriorly, pore PA27 and long seta PA28 at midlength, and pore PA29 posteriorly. + + +Antenna +( +Fig. 13f +). Scape with two pores (AN1–2) situated dorsally and three pores (AN3–5) situated along distal margin on lateral, mesal and ventral faces; pedicel with one pore (AN6) dorsally in distal half of sclerotized area, two short setae (AN10–11) situated mesally and three short setae (AN7–9) situated laterally below antennal sensorium (SE1), AN7 large and stout, similar to SE +1 in +shape. Sclerotized portion of flagellum lacking sensilla, apical group of sensilla (gAN) bearing several moderately long and short setae. + + +Mandible +with 9 sensilla ( +Fig. 13b +). A short long seta (MN1) situated in basal half of outer face, two pores (MN2–3) on dorsal surface ca. at midlength, a pore (MN4), a short seta (MN5) and a small pore (MN6) subapically on inner face. + + + +Maxilla +( + +Figs 14e–f +) with one short seta ( +MX +1) situated ventrally on cardo. Stipes with five moderately long setae on inner surface: +MX +7 situated subbasally, +MX +8–11 in +distal third. Ventral surface with two pores ( +MX +3 and +MX +4) and one very long ( +MX +5) and one short seta ( +MX +6). Palpifer with a long seta ( +MX +16) mesally close to base, two short setae ( +MX +13–14) and one pore ( +MX +12) situated along distal margin; situated distally on lateral surface, +MX +14 ventrally of +MX +16; distal margin ventrally with a seta ( +MX +13) and a pore ( +MX +12). Base of inner appendage with one pore ventrally ( +MX +15) and one dorsally ( +MX +17). Inner appendage (gAPP) with one moderately long seta and several very short setae apically. Palpomere 2 with one tiny seta ( +MX +27) basally and one pore ( +MX +18) at midlength. Palpomere 3 with a series of sensilla on distal margin ( +MX +20–23). Palpomere 4 with a short basal seta ( +MX +24) and two digitiform sensilla situated subapically. Apical membranous area with short sensilla (gMX). + + + +Fig. 10. Head capsule of the first instar larva of + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +a – ventral view; b – dorsal view; c – lateral view. + + + + +Fig. 11. Head capsules of first instar larvae of + +Lihelophorus + +and + +Helophorus + +s.str. +a–b – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(a – ventral; b – dorsal). c–d – + +H. +( +H. +) +liguricus +Angus, 1970 + +(c – ventral; d – dorsal). + + + + +Fig. 12. Labroclypeus and epistome of larvae of + +Lihelophorus + +and + +Helophorus + +s.str. +a–b – + +H. +( +H. +) +liguricus +Angus, 1970 + +(a – dorsal view; b – ventral view); c–d – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +(c – dorsal; d – ventral); e–f – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(e – dorsal; f – ventral). + + + + +Fig. 13. Head appendages of larvae of + +Lihelophorus + +and + +Helophorus + +s.str. +a–d – mandibles in dorsal view: a – + +H. +( +H. +) +liguricus +Angus, 1970 + +(left mandible); b – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +(left mandible); c–d – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(c – left mandible; d – right mandible). e–f – left antenna in dorsal view: e – + +H. +( +H. +) +liguricus +Angus, 1970 + +; f – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +g–j – labium: g–h – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +(g – ventral; h – dorsal); i–j – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(i – ventral; j – dorsal).Abbreviations: mp – mandibular penicillus; rt – retinacular tuft. + + + + +Fig. 14. Head appendages of larvae of + +Lihelophorus + +and + +Helophorus + +s.str. +a–b – labium of + +H. +( +H. +) +liguricus +Angus, 1970 + +(a – ventral; b – dorsal). c–h – maxilla: a–d – + +H. +( +H. +) +liguricus + +(c – ventral; d – dorsal); e–f – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +(e – ventral; f – dorsal); g–h – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(g – ventral; h – dorsal). + + + + +Fig. 15. Thorax and abdomen of + +Lihelophorus + +and + +Helophorus + +s.str. +a–d – metathoracic legs (a – + +H. +( +H. +) +liguricus +Angus, 1970 + +, frontal view; b–c – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +(b – frontal; c – posterior); d – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +). e–f – thorax and first abdominal segments of + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +(e – lateral view; f – dorsal view). g–h – abdominal segments (dorsal and ventral views): g – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +; h – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +. i–j – abdominal segment 9 and urogomphi: i – + +H. +( +H. +) +liguricus +Angus, 1970 + +; j – + +H. +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +Abbreviations:abd1 – abdominal segment 1; msth – mesothorax; mtth – metathorax; pth – prothorax; sp – spiracle. + + + +Labium +( +Figs 10a +, + +13g +–h + +). Submentum with one pair of long setae (LA1), LA2 absent. Mentum with a pair of pores (LA4) and pair of short setae distally on ventral surface. Prementum ventrally with a pair of minute setae (LA5) basally, and a pair of pores (LA7) and a pair of short setae (LA6) distally below articulation of labial palp; dorsal surface with one pair of basal pores (LA8) basally in membranous area, anteromedian portion between palpal bases with two pores (LA9, LA?12) and a pair of setae (LA10). Palpomere 1 with one tiny seta (LA13) basally and a pore (LA14) on intersegmental membrane, palpomere 2 with a subapical pore (LA15) and additional digitiform sensilla. Apical membranous field with multiple short setae. + + +Thorax +( +Figs 8c–d +, +15e–f +). Proscutum with 15 setae and 7 pores on each half situated in three transverse rows; all setae trichoid, pores usually situated close to seta articulation. Ventral portion with two long setae on anterior part of each precoxal sclerite, and a pair of setae situated between procoxa in a membranous area. Lateral portion with a one minute seta behind procoxal articulation. Meso- and metanotum with sensilla arranged in 4 longitudinal rows; each half of mesonotum with 13 setae and 3 pores (2 of them situated next top setal articulation), each half of metanotum with 11 setae and one pore situated next to articulation of posteromesal long seta. Ventral portion of meso- and metathorax with one small sclerite mesally, each with one pair of short setae. + + + +Metathoracic leg +( + +Figs 15b–c +). Coxa with long setae on a ridge anteriorly above trochanter articulation, and a row of short setae more proximally of articulation. Trochanter with a series of elongated pores ca. at midlength on both anterior and posterior surface, two short setae and one pore on anterior face, three setae posteriorly, and one long seta on posterior face. Femur with 8 short setae and one pore; 4 setae and one pore on frontal surface, four setae on posterior surface. Tibiotarsus with an oblique row of three moderately long setae on anterior and posterior face, distal portion with four trichoid setae around claw articulation. Claw bisetose; setae minute, situated in proximal third of claw length. + + + +Abdomen +( + +Figs 8i–j +, +15e–g, 15j +). Each abdominal segment with four longitudinal rows of sensilla serially homologous with those of thoracic segments; first three mesal rows situated on dorsal sclerite, lateralmost series situated on dorsolateral sclerite. Lateral sclerite with one long and one short seta. Medioventral sclerite with three short setae on each side, lateroventral sclerites each with one short seta. Tergite of segment 9 with 7 sensilla on each side, posterolateral seta very long. Urogomphus with two sensilla (one dorsal, one ventral) on segment 1 and 2 each, segment with with long terminal seta only. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D702844FE8058F17181FCB5.xml b/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D702844FE8058F17181FCB5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e8f645f6a8d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D702844FE8058F17181FCB5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1694 @@ + + + +Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea) + + + +Author + +Angus, Robert B. +Division of Life Sciences (Insects), Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, UK; e-mail: r. angus @ royalholloway. ac. uk + + + +Author + +Jia, Fenglong +Museum of Biology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; e-mail: lssjϐl @ mail. sysu. edu. cn + + + +Author + +Chen, Zhen-ning +Biology and Geography School, Qinghai Normal University, Wusi West Road 38 #, 810000, Xining, Qinghai Province, China; e-mail: 149470880 @ qq. com + + + +Author + +Zhang, Ying +Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; e-mail: 344280438 @ qq. com + + + +Author + +Vondráček, Dominik +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ- 193 00 Praha 9 - Horní Počernice, Czech Republic; e-mail: mfikacek @ gmail. com + + + +Author + +Fikáček, Martin +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ- 193 00 Praha 9 - Horní Počernice, Czech Republic; e-mail: mfikacek @ gmail. com + + + +Author + +Sw, London +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com + +text + + +Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae + + +2016 + +2016-07-15 + + +56 + + +1 + + +109 +148 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.5311784 +0374-1036 +5311784 +15CF0A9E-44F3-492B-88F7-A7922EF9F73A + + + + + + + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) +ser +Zaitzev, 1908 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 1d, f–g, i, l +; +2c–d, h–j +; +3d–g +; +4d–h +; +6a–e +) + + + + + + + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) +ser +Zaitzev, 1908: 422 + + +. + + + + + +Helophorus +( +L. +) +ser + +: + + +ANGUS +(1995) + +: 190 + +(redescription, +lectotype +designation); + +FIKÁČEK et al. (2012) +: 437 + +(phylogenetic analysis). + + + + + + +Type +locality. + +China +, +Qinghai Province +, valley of Alag Hu lake, +35.573°N +, +97.120°E +. + + +Type material examined +( +1 spec. +). + +LECTOTYPE +(designated by + +ANGUS 1995 + +): 1 J ( +ZIN +): ‘LECTO- / TYPE [rounded label with violet margin] // Ю. cкл. xp. Буpxaн- +Бyддa +: [= Yu. skl. khr. Burkhan-Budda:] / дoл. oЗ. Aлык- Нop. [dol. oz.Alyk-Nor] + +30.V.1900 + +. / +Эkcп. +КoЗлoвa. [= +Eksp. Kozlova. +] // +Hel. +( +Lihelophorus +) / ser +sp. n. +/ iv.08 +Zaitzev +det. // + +LECTOTYPE +March 1970 +/ +Helophorus ser Zaitz. +/ R. B.Angus det.// кoлл. Семенова- T.Ш. [koll. Semenova-T.Sh.]’ + +Additional material examined +( +95 spec. +). + +CHINA +: +XIZANG +: + +1 J ( +IRSNB +): +Apo Zo +, +Westtibet +, + +Aug.1906 + +, +Zugmayer +(identified as + +H. lamicola + +by +Orchymont +and +Knisch +) + +; + +1 unsexed spec. (BMNH): ‘ +S. Tibet +, vall. +SE +of +Dongo La Pass +[= valley + +SE +of Dong La + +pass], +28°46ʹN +, +87°57ʹE +, 4900–5300 m’, + +18.vi.2011 + +, +J. Schmidt +lgt + +.; + +16 JJ +16 ♀♀ +(BMNH), 1 J 1 unsexed spec. ( +NMPC +): ‘S. +Tibet +E +Nyainqentanglha Feng +[Mt.], E slope +Lha Tsu Vall +[Lha Tsu valley], + +5000–5350 m + +, +30°22′47″N +90°43′22″E’ +, + +20.vii.2010 + +, J. +Schmidt +lgt + +.; + +1 ♀ +( +NMPC +): +Pumo Tso +to +Monda La +, + +5000–5120 m + +, + +28.vi.2015 + +, +28°29′N +90°33′E +, +J. Schmidt +lgt. [DNA voucher MF1248]. + +GANSU +: + +9 spec. +( +NMPC +):Xiahe (= Labrang) env., +35°11.5′N +102°30.6′E +, + +2940 m + +, + +19.–22.vi.2005 + +, +J. Hájek +, +D. Král +& +J. Růžička +lgt. + +QINGHAI +: + +4 spec. +( +NMPC +): +Gangca Dasi +(lamasery), 37°32.4–33.0′N 100°05.3–06.0′E, + +3505–3840 m + +, + +11–12.vi.2005 + +, +J. Hájek +, +D. Král +& +J.Růžička +lgt + +.; + +1 J +5 spec. +( +NMPC +): +Haibu +env., + +3190–3270 m + +,36°48.4–49.8′N 100°45.4–49.7′E, + +13–15.vii.2005 + +, +J. Hájek +, +D. Král +& J. +Růžička +lgt + +.; + +1 J +3 spec. +( +NMPC +): +Hairag +, + +3240 m + +, +37°10.1′N +100°24.7′E +, + +3–5.vii.2005 + +, J. +Hájek +, D. +Král +& J. +Růžička +lgt + +.; + +1 J (BMNH): +Golo +, +Maduo +, roadside pools on river flats + +20 km +E of Maduo. + +34°51′17″N +, +98°17′18″E +, + +4290 m + +, + +8.vi.2013 + +, +R. B. Angus +, +F. L. Jia +& Y. +Zhang +lgt + +.; + +2 JJ +6 ♀♀ +(BMNH): +Golo +, +Huamuxia +, +Zuimatan +, roadside pool, +35°19′52″N +, +99°03′57″E +, + +4141 m + +, + +7.vi.2013 + +, R. B. +Angus +, F. L. +Jia +& Y. +Zhang +lgt + +.; + +3 JJ +2♀♀ +, 6 unsexed spec. ( +SYSU +): same label data + +; + +2 spec. +( +NMPC +): same label data [DNA vouchers MF658 and MF659] + +; + +1 J, 2 unsexed spec. ( +SYSU +): +Kekexili +[= Kekesili], +Kangzhagri +, + +5130 m + +, + +15.viii.1990 + +, +Xuezhong Zhang +lgt + +.; + +2 JJ +1 ♀ +( +SYSU +): +Kekexili +, +Xinqingfeng +[= Syn Qing Feng, or Buka Daban Feng] +Mt. +hot spring, + +4900 m + +, + +2.viii.1990 + +, +Xuezhong Zhang +lgt + +.; + +1 J, 2 unsexed spec. ( +SYSU +): +Kekexili +, +Malanshan +, + +4950 m + +, + +1.viii.1990 + +, +Xuezhong Zhang +lgt + +.; + +1 J ( +SYSU +): +Kekexili +, +Kusaihu lake +, + +4600 m + +, + +10.viii.1990 + +, +Xuezhong Zhang +lgt + +.; + +1 J +1 ♀ +( +SYSU +): +Golo +, +Maduo +, roadside pools near +Yematan +, +34°40′47″N +99°03′57″E +, + +4240 m +a.s.l. + +, + +8.vi.2013 + +, +R. B. Angus +, +F. L. Jia +& +Y. Zhang +lgt. + +INDIA +: +JAMMU + +AND +KASHMIR: +1 ♀ +( +IRSNB +): +Indian Tibet, L +73 +Chushol +, pond below village, + +10.viii.1932 + +(identified as + +H. ser + +by +Orchymont +) + +. + + + + +Fig. 3. Habitus of the species of + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) + +. a–c – + +H. lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(a – Qinghai: Zhaling Hu (lectotype); b–c – Quinghai: Golo).d–g – + +H.ser +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(d–e – Qinghai:Golo; f – Xizang, Nyainqentanglha Feng; g – Gansu: Xiahe env.). h–k – + +H. yangae + +sp. nov. +(h – Xizang: 90 km W of Amdo; i – Xizang: 25 km W of Amdo; j – Qinghai: Golo; k – India: Kar Tso (Orchymont coll.)). All specimens to scale. + + + + +Fig.4. Details of the head and pronotum of the + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) + +specimens.a–c – + +H. lamicola +Zaitzev,1908 + +(a – Qinghai: Zhaling Hu (lectotype); b–c – Qinghai: Golo). d–h – + +H. ser +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(d – Qinghai: valley of Alag Hu lake (lectotype); e–f – Qinghai: Golo; g – Xizang, Nyainqentanglha Feng; h – Gansu: Xiahe env.). Not to scale. + + + + +Fig. 5. Details of the head and pronotum of the + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +(a – Xizang: 90 km W of Amdo; b,d – Qinghai: Golo; c – Xizang: 25 km W of Amdo; e – India: Kar Tso (Orchymont coll.). Not to scale. + + + + +Differential diagnosis. +Characterized by moderately wide pronotum with distinctly sinuate sides abruptly narrowed just before anterior corners, with five longitudinal grooves distinctly impressed ( +Figs 2c–d +, +3a–g +, +4d–h +); in this it is more similar to + +H. yangae + +sp. nov. +(which differs by aedeagus with rounded parameral apices) than to + +H. lamicola + +. Elytral series, including the scutellary stria, are always very distinct (in contrast to + +H. lamicola + +). Meso- and metatarsal claws are long (as in + +H. lamicola + +, but unlike + +H. yangae + +sp. nov. +). Metatarsomere 5 is usually longer (often much longer) than metatarsomeres 3–4 combined. The aedeagus is very similar to + +H. lamicola + +(based on pointed parameral apices) but the median lobe in narrower and its apical portion longer ( +Figs 6a–e +). For detailed comparison see +Table 2 +. + + + + +Redescription. +Body length: +4.4–5.7 mm +in males, +4.9–6.1 mm +in females. + + +Head. +Dull bronze with green to purple reflections to completely black, closely and irregularly punctate, giving a rough effect in some portions, punctation consisting of two sizes of punctures. Y-groove shallow to moderately deep, with rather distinct stem wider than lateral arms, widened anteriorly. Maxillary palpi pale yellow, elongate, apical segment asymmetrical. Antennae yellow, 9-segmented. Maxillary galea in shape of simple pubescent lobe, without strong spines ( +Fig. 1d +). Mandible rather short, with simple blunt apex ( +Fig. 1f +). + + +Pronotum +. Yellow, wider than the head, moderately and evenly arched. Widest closely before anterior corners; sides strongly arcuate, abruptly narrowed anteriorly, straight to indistinctly sinuate posteriorly. Grooves distinct, usually deeply and sharply impressed; mid groove straight, narrow; submedian grooves slightly sinuate; submarginal grooves with their basal pits distinct, bent mesally in anterior fourth. Narrow raised lateral margin distinct. Intervals without granules but with large punctures and smaller ones between them. + + +Elytra +. Yellow as pronotum, with or without apparent darker sutural Λ- mark and sublateral spots. Striae distinct, consisting of rather large punctures, scutellary stria always distinct. Interval punctures much smaller than the striae, with fine erect hairs. All intervals flat, including the 10 +th +. + + +Legs +. Long, with long swimming-hairs on meso- and metatibiae and meso- and metatarsi; metatarsomere 5 distinctly longer than metatarsomeres 3–4 combined; metatarsal claw ca. 0.5× as long as utimate metatarsomere. + + +Aedeagus +. Parameres pointed, very weakly to strongly sinuate on outer margin. Phallobase ca. as long as or slightly shorther than parameres. Median lobe narrow, its distal portion long (in shape of more less equilateral triangle); base of median lobe (between the struts) arcuate, with median backwardly directed spur. + + +Variation. +The species varies considerably in size and body proportions; both smaller narrower ( +Fig. 3e +) and larger wide ( +Figs 3d, g +) specimens are known. Coloration also varies slightly, especially as it concerns the colouration of the head ( +Figs 4d–h +) and the absence / presence of the dark patterns on elytra; elytra of the specimens from high altitudes of southern +Xizang +(collected by J. Schmidt) are often slightly darker than in other examined specimens ( +Fig. 3f +). The pronotum varies slightly in the shape of the sides as well as in the depth and shape of the pronotal grooves ( +Figs 4d–h +), with rare specimens with partly reduced shallow grooves ( +Fig. 4e +) which may resemble + +H. lamicola + +. The aedeagus varies considerably in the shape of the apical portions of parameres: the variation is the same as in + +H. lamicola + +, see there for details. In addition to that, we observed the considerable variation in the length of the aedeagus (compare +Figs 6a–c and 6d–e +) which was not found in + +H. lamicola + +. Examined specimens with shorter aedeagus were mostly from southern +Xizang +(specimens collected by J. Schmidt, +Figs 6b–c +), but the +lectotype +from central +Qinghai +also has this kind of the aedeagus; on the other hand, most specimens examined from +Qinghai +and +Gansu +have longer aedeagus ( +Figs 6d–e +). The apparent paler coloration of the aedeagus of the +lectotype +and specimens collected by J. Schmidt ( +Figs 6a–c +) may be an artefact of long-term storage of the specimens in fixation fluid. + + + + +Distribution +(Fig. 7a). Very widely distributed on the Tibetan Plateau, from Indian province Jammu and Kashmir to southern +Gansu +in +China +. It occurs at altitudes ranging from +2940 m +( +Gansu +: Labrang) to ca. +5350 m +( +Xizang +: Nyainqentanglha Feng). As pointed out by Joachim Schmidt (pers. comm. to R. B. Angus) this makes it one of the highest-living of all +Coleoptera +. +Note. +The record of + +H. ser + +from Indian +Tibet +by +ORCHYMONT (1943) +was based on a misidentified specimen of + +H. yangae + +(see under that species for details). + + + + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) +yangae + +Angus +, Fiká + +č +ek & Jia, sp. nov. +( +Figs 1a–c, e, h +; +2a–b, g +; +3h–k +; +5a–e +; +6j–n +) + + + + + +Type +locality. + +China +, +Qinghai Province +. Zuimatan, Roadside pool, +35.333°N +99.007°E +. + + + +Type material ( +143 spec. +): + + +HOLOTYPE +: J ( +SYSU +): ‘CHINA QINGHAI +Golo +, +Huamuxia +, +Zuimatan +, +Roadside +pool, +35°19′52”N +99°03′57”E +, + +4141m + +, + +7.vi.2013 + +, +R.B.Angus +, +F.L.Jia +& Y. +Zhang +lgt + +.’ + +PARATYPES +: + +CHINA +: +QINGHAI +: + +2 JJ +2 ♀♀ +(BMNH): same data as the holotype [1 J: chromosome prep. 3, + +12.vi.2013 + +, +R.B. Angus +; 1 J: chromosome prep. 1, + +13.vi.2013 + +, R.B. +Angus +] + +; + +2 JJ +1 ♀ +( +SYSU +): same data as the holotype + +; + +1 J +2 ♀♀ +(BMNH): +Golo +, +Maduo +, roadside pools near +Yematan +, +34°40′47″N +99°03′57″E +, + +4240 m + +, + +8.vi.2013 + +, +R. B. Angus +, +F. L. Jia +& +Y. Zhang +lgt. [J: chromosome prep. 2, + +10.vi.2013 + +, R. B. +Angus +] + +; + +6 JJ +9 ♀♀ +( +SYSU +): same label data + +; + +2 ♀♀ +( +NMPC +): same label data [DNA vouchers MF662 and MF664] + +; + +3 JJ +2 ♀♀ +( +SYSU +): +Golo +, +Maduo +, +Heihexiang +, roadside pools near +Xingxinghai lake +34°40′47″N +99°03′57″E +, + +4240 m +a.s.l. + +, + +8.vi.2013 + +, +R. B. Angus +, +F. L. Jia +& Y. +Zhang +lgt + +; + +1 female +(BMNH): +Golo +, +Maduo +, roadside pools on river flats + +20 km +E of Maduo. + +34°51′17″N +, +98°17′18″E +, + +4290 m + +, + +8.vi.2013 + +, +R. B. Angus +, +F. L. Jia +& Y. +Zhang +lgt + +.; + +1 ♀ +(BMNH): N. +Qinghai +Hu +, +Gangca +, roadside pool. +37°18′N +, +100°11′E +, + +3370 m + +, + +5.vi.2013 + +, +F. L. Jia +& +Y. Zhang +lgt. [chromosome prep. 2, + +12.vi.2013 + +, +R. B. Angus +]. + +XIZANG +: + +3 JJ 4 unsexed spec. ( +SYSU +):suburb of +Rikaze +, + +3826 m + +, + +20–23.vii.1986 + +, +Liang Ge-Qiu +lgt + +.; + +1 unsexed spec.( +SYSU +): +Jiangzi +, + +27–28.vii.1986 + +, +Liang Ge-Qiu +lgt + +.; + +3 JJ +3 ♀♀ +, 19 unsexed spec. ( +SYSU +): +Dangxiong +, +Yangbajing town +, + +4320 m +a.s.l. + +, + +6.viii.2013 + +, +30°5′43.18″N +, +90°32′21.33″E +, +Jia Yue +& +Jia Fenglong +lgt + +.; + +2 JJ +3 ♀♀ +8 unsexed spec. ( +SYSU +): +Nanshan +, +Zhanang County +, +Sangye Fery +, +29°19′23.12″N +, +91°30′33.79″E +, + +3658 m +a.s.l. + +, + +2.viii.2013 + +, +Jia Yue +& +Jia Fenglong +lgt + +.; + +2 JJ +2 ♀♀ +6 unsexed spec. ( +SYSU +): +Nanshan +, +Zhanang County +, near +Sangye +temple, +29°19′25.49″N +, +91°30′13.42″E +, + +3575 m +a.s.l. + +, + +6.viii.2013 + +, +Jia Yue +& +Jia Fenglong +lgt + +.; + +2 JJ +2 ♀♀ +9 unsexed spec. ( +SYSU +): +Shannan +, +Zhanang County +, +Sangye town +, +29°19′23.12″N +, +91°30′33.79″E +, + +3620 m +a.s.l. + +Jia Yue +& +Jia Fenglong +lgt + +.; + +1 J ( +SYSU +): +Shannan +, +Langkazi +, +28°58′4.91″N +, +90°23′52.72″E +, + +5030 m +a.s.l. + +, + +5.viii.2013 + +, +Jia Yue +& +Jia Fenglong +lgt + +.; + +2 JJ +2 ♀♀ +, 7 unsexed spec. ( +SYSU +): near +Yangzhuoyongcuo lake +, +28°54′57.55″N +, +90°43′29.18″E +, + +4447 m +a.s.l. + +, + +3.viii.2013 + +, +Jia Fenglong +& +Jia Yue +lgt + +.; + +1 J ( +SYSU +): +Gongbujiangda +, +29°53′7.01″N +, +93°14′45.88″E +, + +4155 m +a.s.l. + +, + +2.viii.2013 + +, +Jia Fenglong +& +Jia Yue +lgt + +.; + +4 JJ +2 ♀♀ +15 unsexed spec. ( +SYSU +): +Rikaze +, +Jiamudui village +, +29°9′11.57″N +, +89°0′40.67″E +, + +3872 m +a.s.l. + +, + +2.viii.2013 + +, +Jia Yue +lgt + +; + +1 J +3 ♀♀ +( +NHMW +): ‘CHINA: +Tibet +9.VIII. / + +90 km +W Amdo + +/ +Cigetang + +4400m + +/ leg. +X. Guo +1998 + +’; + +1 ♀ +( +NHMW +): ‘CHINA: Tibet 14.VIII. / + +25 km +W Amdo + +, + +4400m + +/ +Couna Lake +– brook / leg. +X. Guo +1998’. + +INDIA +: +JAMMU + +AND +KASHMIR: +1 J ( +IRSNB +): ‘male symbol // +Indian Tibet +/ +Tzo-Kar +[= +Kar Tso +] Sta- / ktsak-Puk-tso [= +Startsakpuk Tso +] / pool in swamp / 4-IX, 1932 // +A. d’Orchymont +det. / H. ( +Lihelophorus +) / ser +Zaitzev’ + +. + + + + +Differential diagnosis. +Distinguished from the other two + +Lihelophorus + +species ( + +H. lamicola + +and + +H. ser + +) by the rather wide evenly arched pronotum (width approximately equal to length of mesotarsus + claw) with rounded sides and narrow marginal grooves, rather short metatarsal claws and by the bluntly rounded apices of the parameres. For detailed comparison see +Table 2 +. +Description. +Body length: +4.6–5.1 mm +in males, 5.0– +6.1 mm +in females. + + +Head. +Greenish bronze to maroon bronze, surface with flattened granulation, the granules with large median pits and the grooves between the granules sometimes interrupted resulting in partial coalescence of the granules. Y-groove with the stem at least twice as wide as the arms, widened anteriorly, its floor rugulose. Maxillary palpi yellow, elongate, the apical segment asymmetrical, darkened towards the tip. Antennae with 9 antennomeres, yellow, the clubs a little darker. Maxillary galea angulate apically, with several stout setae ( +Fig. 1c +). Mandible wide, apex bifid ( +Fig. 1e +). + + + +Fig. 6.Aedeagophores of + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) + +species. a–e – + +H. +( +L. +) +ser +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(a – lectotype, Qinghai: valley of Alag Hu lake; b–c – Xizang: valley SE of Dong La pass; d – Qinghai: Golo, 20 km E of Maduo; e – Qinghai: Zuimatan). f–j – + +H. +( +L. +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(f – lectotype, Qinghai: Djarin Nor; g–i – Qinghai: Zuimatan; j – paralectotype, Xizang: S of Arka-tagh, 5073 m a.s.l., lgt. S. Hedin). k–o – + +H. +( +L. +) +yangae + +sp. nov. +(k – holotype, Qinghai: Zuimatan; l–m – paratypes, same locality; n – Qinghai: Golo, Yematan; o – Xizang: Gongbujiangda). + + + + +Table 2. Comparison of adult morphology of + +Lihelophorus + +species. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Character + + +H. lamicola + + + +H. ser + + + + +H. yangae + +sp. nov. + +
Mandibular apexsimple (as in Fig. 1f)simple (Fig. 1f)bifid (Fig. 1e; rare specimens with simple apex exist)
Laciniasimple, with trichoid setae (as in Fig. 1d)simple, with trichoid setae (Fig. 1d)bilobate, with stout setae distally (Fig. 1c)
Pronotum shapeflatweakly archedhighly and evenly arched
Pronotal grooveslargely reduced (Figs 2e, 4a–c)well developed (Figs 2c, 4d–h)well developed (Figs 2a, 5)
Lateral margins of pronotumvery weakly arcuate (Figs 4a–c)strongly arcuate, strongly narrowed anteriorly (Figs 4d–h)evenly rounded (Fig. 5)
Basal pronotal marginnarrower than elytral bases combined (Figs 3a–c)narrower than elytral bases combined (Figs 3e–g)ca. as wide as elytral bases combined (Figs 3h–k)
Strial punctures of elytraminute, scarcely impressed (Fig. 2b)coarse, well impressed (Fig. 2d)minute, scarcely impressed (Fig. 2f)
Interval puncturesca. as large as strial puncturesmuch smaller than strial punctresca. large as strial punctures
Punctures of scutellary stria7–9, often become indis- tinct4–7, coarse and always distinct6–8, always distinct
Legs including clawsconspicuously longconspicuously longless obviously long
Metarsomere 5ca. as long as metatar- someres 3–4 combined (sometimes longer)much longer than meta- tarsomeres 3–4 combined (sometimes as long as)slightly longer or as long as metatarsomeres 3–4 combined
Metatarsomere / tarsal claw1.51.71.9
Apex of paramerespointedpointedblunt
Apical portion of median lobeequilateral triangleisosceles triangleisosceles to almost equilat- eral triangle
Phallobaseshortshort to very longshort
+ + +Pronotum +. Yellow, grooves sometimes slightly darker. Moderately and very evenly arched, widest medially, the sides evenly curved. Grooves narrow and shallow, sometimes weaker over anterior fifth of the pronotum; submedian grooves weakly angled outwards medially, occasionally interrupted in the region of the angle; marginal grooves rather indistinct, not obviously widened medially. Intervals punctate, sometimes very finely so; surface between the punctures either smooth or rugulose. + + +Elytra +. Yellow to dirty yellow with vague darker mottling, the brownish sutural Λ- mark absent or distinct. Striae present as rows of punctures, very weakly impressed below the level of the interstices. All interstices, including the outermost one, completely flat. Scutellary stria with 5–8 punctures. Elytra widest just behind middle, tapering to blunt apex, the sides gently rounded. + + +Legs +. Yellow with apical tarsal segment dark brown apically, and claws brown. Legs rather long, with long swimming-hairs on meso- and metatibiae and meso- and metatarsi; + +metatarsomere 5 distinctly ca. as long as metatarsomeres 3–4 combined; metatarsal claw ca. 0.4× as long as ultimate metatarsomere. + +Aedeagus +. Parameres bluntly rounded apically, weakly sinuate on outer margin. Phallobase ca. as long as parameres. Median lobe wide, its distal portion short (in shape of more less isosceles triangle); base of median lobe (between the struts) straight, with median backwardly directed spur. + + + + +Variation. +The species varies slightly in size and body proportions, both smaller narrower ( +Fig. 3j +) and larger wider ( +Fig. 3i +) are known. Coloration varies slightly as well, both in coloration of the head (black or with weak greenish to purple sheen) and the elytra (from yellowish to brown, sutural Λ- mark present or absent). Pronotum varies slightly in the extent of the impression of the grooves as well as in their shape, in rare specimens the submedian grooves may be even Y-shaped anteriorly ( +Fig. 5d +). Aedeagus varies slightly in the proportions of the median lobe, but otherwise its morphology is very constant in all specimens examined. + + + + +Etymology. +This species is named after Dr Xiaomei Yang, wife of Fenglong Jia. + + + + +Distribution +(Fig. 7a). Widely distributed on the Tibetan Plateau, at altitudes ranging from +3300 m +(Gangca) to ca. +5000 m +(Langkazi). + + +Immature stages + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D71285FFE865B917070FC3F.xml b/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D71285FFE865B917070FC3F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eadcfd15886 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D71285FFE865B917070FC3F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,495 @@ + + + +Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea) + + + +Author + +Angus, Robert B. +Division of Life Sciences (Insects), Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, UK; e-mail: r. angus @ royalholloway. ac. uk + + + +Author + +Jia, Fenglong +Museum of Biology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; e-mail: lssjϐl @ mail. sysu. edu. cn + + + +Author + +Chen, Zhen-ning +Biology and Geography School, Qinghai Normal University, Wusi West Road 38 #, 810000, Xining, Qinghai Province, China; e-mail: 149470880 @ qq. com + + + +Author + +Zhang, Ying +Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; e-mail: 344280438 @ qq. com + + + +Author + +Vondráček, Dominik +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ- 193 00 Praha 9 - Horní Počernice, Czech Republic; e-mail: mfikacek @ gmail. com + + + +Author + +Fikáček, Martin +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ- 193 00 Praha 9 - Horní Počernice, Czech Republic; e-mail: mfikacek @ gmail. com + + + +Author + +Sw, London +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com + +text + + +Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae + + +2016 + +2016-07-15 + + +56 + + +1 + + +109 +148 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.5311784 +0374-1036 +5311784 +15CF0A9E-44F3-492B-88F7-A7922EF9F73A + + + + + + + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 1j–k +; +2e–f, k +; +3a–c +; +4a–c +; +6f–i +) + + + + + + + +Helophorus +( +Lihelophorus +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908: 421 + + +. + +Helophorus +( +L. +) +lamicola + +: + + +ANGUS +(1995) + +: 189 + +(redescription, +lectotype +designation). + + + + + + +Type +locality. + +China +, +Qinghai Province +, Zhaling Hu (Lake) (= Djarin Nor), +34.911°N +97.273°E +. + + +Type material examined +( +3 spec. +). + +LECTOTYPE +(designated by + +ANGUS +1995: 189 + +): 1 J ( +ZIN +): ‘LECTO- / TYPE [rounded label with violet margin] // Дoл. оЗер верхн. Хуан- хе: [= +Dol. +ozer verkhn. +Khuan-khe +] / oЗ. Джарин- -нор. [= oz. +Dzharin-nor. +] / Кон. [= +Kon. +] + +VI. 1900 + +. / +Эkcп. +КoЗлoвa. [= +Eksp. Kozlova. +] // + + +LECTOTYPE + +March 1970 + +/ +Helophorus lamicola +/ +Zaitz. +/ +R. B. +Angus +det. // coll. +Zaitzev’ + +. + +PARALECTOTYPES +: 1 damaged specimen with dissected mouthparts, +1 ♀ +( +ZIN +): ‘PARA- / LECTO- / TYPE [rounded label with blue margin] // Дoл. оЗер верхн. Хуан- хе: / oЗ. Джарин- нор. / Кон. + +VI. 1900 + +. / +Эkcп. +КoЗлoвa. // + +March 1970 + + +/ + +Paralectotype +. / +H. lamicola Zaitzev +/ +R. B. +Angus +det. // coll. +Zaitzev’ + +; + +1 J ( +NHRS +): ‘ +Vatten +djur [= water animal] / 25 +Juni +[19]01 / L. XXIII [= camp XXIII] / +Hedin +// +Hel. +( +Lihelophorus +) / lamicola m. / III. 08 +Zaitzev +det. / 8248 // NHRS-JKLB /000021180 // 3817 / E91”. +Based +on +ORCHYMONT (1943) +who studied +Sven Hedinʼs +journal, camp 23 was situated south of +Arka-tagh +at altitude of + +5073 m +a.s.l. + +, at approximate GPS coordinates +36°16ʹN +, +88°21′E + +. + + + +Additional material examined +( +9 spec. +). + +CHINA +: +QINGHAI +: + +1 ♀ +(BMNH): same label data as the lectotype, but from +Semenov +collection and without type labels + +; + +3 JJ +1 ♀ +(BMNH): +Golo +, +Huamuxia +, +Zuimatan +, roadside pool, +35°19′52″N +, +99°03′57″E +, + +4141 m + +, + +7.vi.2013 + +, +R. B. Angus +, +F. L. Jia +& Y. +Zhang +lgt + +.; 1 J ( +SYSU +): same label data; + +2 spec. +( +NMPC +): same label data [DNA vouchers MF661 and MF662] + +; + +1 ♀ +( +NMPC +): road to +Tuotuohe +, + +4500 m + +, +35°21′53″N +93°26′28″E +, + +22.vii.2015 + +, +J. Schmidt +lgt. [DNA voucher MF1247] + +. + + + + +Differential diagnosis. +Differs from other + +Lihelophorus + +by narrow pronotum (maximum width clearly less than length of mesotarsus + claw) with rather straight sides and almost entirely effaced pronotal grooves ( +Figs 2e +, +3a–c +, +4a–c +). In contrast to other + +Lihelophorus + +, elytral series are often not impressed basally, punctures of elytral series are small and interval punctures very small; because of that, the scutellary stria is sometimes rather indistinct. Meso- and metatarsal claws are long (as in + +H. ser + +, but unlike + +H. yangae + +sp. nov. +). The aedeagus is very similar to that of + +H. ser + +(based on pointed parameral apices) but the median lobe is wider and the apical portion shorter ( +Figs 6f–i +). For detailed comparison see +Table 2 +. + + + + +Redescription. +Body length: +5.1–5.5 mm +in males, +5.2–6.1 mm +in females. + + +Head. +Dull brownish bronze with green reflections, closely and irregularly punctate, the punctures not round, giving a generally rough effect. Y-groove shallow, its stem rather indistinct, wider than the lateral arms, widened anteriorly. Maxillary palpi pale yellow, elongate, apical segment asymmetrical. Antennae yellow, 9-segmented. Maxillary galea in shape of simple pubescent lobe, without strong spines (as in +Fig. 1d +). Mandible rather short, with simple blunt apex (as in +Fig. 1f +). + + +Pronotum +. Yellow, a little wider than the head, moderately and evenly arched, widest before the middle, sides weakly curved to base. Anterior angles sharper and more pronounced than is usual in + +Helophorus + +. Grooves scarcely traceable, mid groove straight, narrow; submedian grooves angled outwards medially, petering out anteriorly but sinuate a quarter of the way from each end; submarginal grooves with their basal pits distinct, traceable forward from these, petering out at middle of pronotum. Narrow raised lateral margin distinct. Intervals without granules but with large punctures and smaller ones between them. + + +Elytra +. Yellow, as pronotum, without apparent darker marks, slightly dull. Striae weak and shallow, scutellary stria present but often rather indistinct due to small size of serial punctures. Interval punctures only slightly smaller than the striae, with fine erect hairs. All intervals flat, including the 10 +th +. + + +Legs +. Long, with long swimming-hairs on meso- and metatibiae and meso- and metatarsi; metatarsomere 5 ca. as long as metatarsomeres 3–4 combined; metatarsal claw ca. 0.65× as long as utimate metatarsomere. + + +Aedeagus +. Parameres pointed, very weakly to strongly sinuate on outer margin. Phallobase ca. as long as or slightly shorther than parameres. Median lobe wide, its distal portion short (in shape of more less isosceles triangle); base of median lobe (between the struts) rather straight but with median backwardly directed spur. + + +Variation. +The species varies considerably in size and body proportions, i.e. both smaller narrower ( +Fig. 3b +) and larger wide ( +Fig. 3c +) are known. The shape of the sides of the pronotum varies slightly from weakly arcuate ( +Fig. 4a +) to indistinctly sinuate ( +Figs 4c +). The aedeagus varies considerably in the shape of the apical portions of parameres; they may be narrow with lateral margin indistinctly sinuate ( +Figs 6f–g +) or apically widely expanded with lateral margin strongly sinuate ( +Figs 6h–i +); the proportion of the phallobase to parameres varies slightly, but no specimens with extremely long phallobase were found; the width of the apical portion of the median lobe varies from very wide ( + +Figs +6g +–h + +) to rather narrow ( +Figs 6f, i +). The apparent paler coloration of the aedeagus of the +lectotype +( +Fig. 6f +) in comparison to other specimens examined ( + +Figs +6g +–i + +) is very likely caused by the fact that the +lectotype +is slightly teneral. + + + + +Distribution +(Fig. 7a). Confined to the northern part of the Tibetan Plateau, from Zuimatan in the east, via Lake Zhaling Hu ( +type +locality) to Sven Hedin’s camp 23, situated south of the Arka-tagh mountains. The altitudes of the localities range from about +4140 to 5070 m +a.s.l. + + +Note. +The record of + +H. lamicola + +from Apo Tso by +ORCHYMONT (1943) +was based on a misidentified specimen of + +H. ser + +(see under that species for details). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D7C2853FE6759537214F9FF.xml b/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D7C2853FE6759537214F9FF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5961b571930 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7A/87/377A879F8D7C2853FE6759537214F9FF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ + + + +Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea) + + + +Author + +Angus, Robert B. +Division of Life Sciences (Insects), Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, UK; e-mail: r. angus @ royalholloway. ac. uk + + + +Author + +Jia, Fenglong +Museum of Biology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; e-mail: lssjϐl @ mail. sysu. edu. cn + + + +Author + +Chen, Zhen-ning +Biology and Geography School, Qinghai Normal University, Wusi West Road 38 #, 810000, Xining, Qinghai Province, China; e-mail: 149470880 @ qq. com + + + +Author + +Zhang, Ying +Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China; e-mail: 344280438 @ qq. com + + + +Author + +Vondráček, Dominik +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ- 193 00 Praha 9 - Horní Počernice, Czech Republic; e-mail: mfikacek @ gmail. com + + + +Author + +Fikáček, Martin +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com & Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ- 193 00 Praha 9 - Horní Počernice, Czech Republic; e-mail: mfikacek @ gmail. com + + + +Author + +Sw, London +Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ- 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: dominik. vondracek @ gmail. com + +text + + +Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae + + +2016 + +2016-07-15 + + +56 + + +1 + + +109 +148 + + + +journal article +10.5281/zenodo.5311784 +0374-1036 +5311784 +15CF0A9E-44F3-492B-88F7-A7922EF9F73A + + + + + + +Subgenus + +Lihelophorus +Zaitzev, 1908 + + + + + + + + +Type +species. + + +Helophorus +( +L. +) +lamicola +Zaitzev, 1908 + +(designated by +HANSEN 1991: 285 +). + + + + +Diagnosis of adults. +Body moderately large to large ( +4.4–6.1 mm +); antenna with 9 antennomeres; maxillary palpus 4 asymmetrical ( +Figs 4–5 +); labial palpus ca. as long as cardo ( +Fig. 1a–b +); labial palpomere 3 slightly asymmetrical, with fringe of long setae ( +Figs 1b, g +); gular sutures widely separate ( +Fig. 1a +); clypeus and frons without well-defined granules ( +Figs 4–5 +); pronotum with 5 longitudinal grooves (largely reduced and weakly distinct only posteriorly in + +H. lamicola + +), without granules ( +Figs 2a,c,e +, +4–5 +); scutellary stria of elytron present ( +Figs 2b,d,f +); elytron without elevated alternate intervals, tubercles or erect setae ( +Fig. 3 +); elytral interval 10 flat, i.e. elytral flanks absent ( +Figs 2j–k +); epipleuron with wide inner pubescent portion ( +Fig. 2j +); whole metaventrite and abdominal ventrites with dense pubescence; meso- and metatarsomere 2 longer than metatarsomere 3 ( +Figs 1h–j +); tibiae and tarsi of middle and posterior legs with row of long swimming-hairs ( +Figs 1h–k +); posterior margin of last abdominal ventrite with minute irregular teeth ( +Fig. 2i +). + + +By body size and general habitus, the presence of distinct scutellary stria and asymmetrical ultimate maxillary palpomere, the + +Lihelophorus + +species resemble representatives of subgenera + +Helophorus + +s. str. +and + +Gephelophorus +Sharp, 1915 + +. They differ from them by (1) presence of series of swimming-hairs on meso- and metatibiae and (2) flat last elytral interval. The well-developed series of swimming-hairs on meso- and metatibiae are only present in the species of the subgenus + +Rhopalohelophorus +Kuwert, 1886 + +, which can be however easily distinguished from + +Lihelophorus + +by the absence of scutellary stria on the elytron. + + + + +Distribution. +Endemic to the Tibetan Plateau (Fig. 7a) + + +Analysis of molecular data. +The division of the molecular dataset into three partitions was selected as the best partition scheme, with different substitution model selected for each codon position: GTR+G for the first, F81+I for the second and HKY+G for the third codon position. The analysis revealed strongly supported clades for the subgenus + +Lihelophorus + +as well as for its three species recognized by means of morphology ( +Fig. 9a +). Both larval morphotypes reared from egg cases laid by field-collected adults were reliably assigned to adults from the same locality: the larva with abdominal appendages (MF660) to + +H. lamicola + +and the larva without the appendages (MF666) to + +H. yangae + +sp. nov. +Intraspecific variation of +cox1 +sequences ranged between 0.0–2.9 % (mean 1.9 %) in + +H. lamicola + +, 0.8–6.3 % (mean 4.4 %) in + +H. ser + +and 0.0–0.1 % (mean 0.1 %) in + +H. yangae + +sp. nov. +Interspecific distances range from 10.4–13.4 %. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFC8FFD0FF39FF5DA62CFD23.xml b/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFC8FFD0FF39FF5DA62CFD23.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..911b60af145 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFC8FFD0FF39FF5DA62CFD23.xml @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@ + + + +Review of the grass-feeding leafhopper genera Miradeltaphus Dash & Viraktamath and Yua namia Zhang & Duan (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae: Deltocephalini) + + + +Author + +Duan, Yani + + + +Author + +Dietrich, Christopher H. + + + +Author + +Zhang, Yalin + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4098 + + +1 + + +158 +166 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4098.1.7 +30390a00-5c2f-4c83-a26f-c2792d763158 +1175-5326 +259760 +5FAE6715-E013-4890-B242-2DDB0688AE55 + + + + + + + +Yuanamia producta +(Xing & Li) + +, +comb. n. + + + + +( +Figs. 5–6 +) + + + + + + +Parayuanamia +producta + +Xing & Li, in + +Li, Dai & Xing, 2011 +: 171 + +. + + + +Length. Male: +4.6–5.1mm +. + + +Description. +Ground color stramineous marked with orange and brown; dorsum with pair of orange longitudinal submedial bands extended from crown apex to scutellum. Fore margin of head white bordered with dark brown, crown apex with pair of thin brown bands between midline and eyes, coronal suture dark brown ( +Fig. 5 +A); face mostly brown, with paired white arcs ( +Fig. 5 +C). Pronotum with two pairs of longitudinal bands laterad of submedial bands, midline of pronotum and scutellum brown ( +Fig. 5 +A). Forewing brown, becoming paler toward costal margin, veins contrastingly pale; legs light brown with few darker transverse bands on femora ( +Figs. 5 +A–B). + + +Head wider than pronotum, crown depressed, anterior margin parabolically rounded in dorsal view, distinctly shorter than minimum distance between eyes; ocellus closely adjacent to and nearly touching eye; antenna longer than head width ( +Figs. 5 +A–B); anteclypeus parallel-sided, not extended to ventral margin of face; lorum semicircular, slightly narrower than anteclypeus, well separated from lateral margin of face ( +Fig. 5 +C). Forewing with anterior branches of vein R not strongly reflexed; with four apical and three anteapical cells, apical cells shorter than half length of anteapical cells, inner anteapical cell very long; claval veins connected to each other by 0–2 crossveins, vein Pcu connected to claval suture by crossvein; appendix present but narrow ( +Figs. 5 +A–B). Front femur with AM1 seta large, stout, situated at mid-height of apex, intercalary row with ~8–10 fine pale setae, row AV with ~16 short, stout, slightly curved setae in basal half; tibia rows AD and PD each with 4 macrosetae. +Hind +femur macrosetal formula 2+2+1, tibia rows PD, AD and AV with 8, 10 and 13 macrosetae, respectively; AD and PD with 0–5 and 1–4 shorter setae between successive macrosetae; PD with intercalary setae longer than those in AD; row PV with ~22 fine, close-set setae; tarsomere I with 2 ventral longitudinal rows well differentiated, pecten with 3–4 platellae. + + + +FIGURE 5. + +Yuanamia producta + +. A: habitus, dorsal view; B: habitus, lateral view; C: face. + + + +Male genitalia. +Pygofer lobes fused dorsomedially for considerable distance near base, forming long, unbroken tergite ( +Fig. 6 +B); lobes without processes, with numerous macrosetae in distal half ( +Figs. 6 +A–B). Valve and subgenital plates articulated ( +Fig. 6 +C). Subgenital plates separate throughout length but with medial margins closely appressed, lateral margin nearly straight, with uniseriate row of marginal macrosetae ( +Fig. 6 +C). Style with very long articulatory arm, preapical lobe short, angular, apex simple, tapered, without process ( +Fig. 6 +D). Connective elongate, slender, arms each with lateral lobe near anterior end ( +Figs. 6 +E–F). Aedeagal shaft extremely elongate and slender,>3 times longer than connective, slightly curved dorsad, distal processes very slightly divergent in dorsal view, gonopore apical on dorsal surface ( +Figs. 6 +E–F). + + + + +Remarks. +This species is similar to the +type +species of the genus, + +Y +. +anastoma +Zhang & Duan + +, in overall structure, color pattern and male genitalia but differs in having a shorter, broader crown, male subgenital plates separate throughout their length and the aedeagus much more elongate, with the shaft more than three times longer than the connective (less than two times longer in + +Y +. +anastoma +Zhang & Duan + +). + + + + +Material examined. +1♂ +, +Thailand +: Chiang Mai, Doi Inthanon NP Vachirathan Fall, +18° 32.31'N +, +98° 36.048'E +, +700m +, Malaise trap, +1–8 v 2007 +, Y. Areeluck, leg T1825. + + + + +Distribution. +China +, +Thailand +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCAFFD3FF39FF5DA569FD2C.xml b/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCAFFD3FF39FF5DA569FD2C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..468a23bc352 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCAFFD3FF39FF5DA569FD2C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ + + + +Review of the grass-feeding leafhopper genera Miradeltaphus Dash & Viraktamath and Yua namia Zhang & Duan (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae: Deltocephalini) + + + +Author + +Duan, Yani + + + +Author + +Dietrich, Christopher H. + + + +Author + +Zhang, Yalin + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4098 + + +1 + + +158 +166 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4098.1.7 +30390a00-5c2f-4c83-a26f-c2792d763158 +1175-5326 +259760 +5FAE6715-E013-4890-B242-2DDB0688AE55 + + + + + + + +Miradeltaphus + +sp. + + + + +( +Figs. 3–4 +) + + + + +Length. Female: +4.5mm +. + + +Description. +Sternite VII with “V” shaped concave on posterior margin ( +Figs. 3 +D, 4E). + + +Female genitalia. +First valvula dorsal sculpturing granulose to maculose, submarginal ( +Figs. 4 +A–B). Second valvula abruptly broadened ~1/2 its length from base, with small obliquely triangular dorsal teeth on nearly apical 1/2 ( +Figs. 4 +C–D). + + + + +Material examined. +1♀, +Thailand +: Loei Phu Ruea NP Nem Wibaak ditch, +17° 29.907′N +, +101° 20.483′E +, +1196m +, Malaise trap, +19–26 ii 2007 +, Patikhom Tumtip, leg T1711. + + + + +Remarks. +This specimen closely resembles + +M +. +sanogae + +in general coloration and external form but the claval veins are not confluent. It may represent the female of + +M +. +sanogae + +or another species of the genus. The shape of sternite VII is very similar to that of + +M +. +mirabilis +Dash & Viraktamath + +, as illustrated by +Dash & Viraktamath (1995) +but the median emargination is somewhat shallower and more V-shaped and the lateral lobes lack conspicuous teeth. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCCFFD4FF39FF5DA04CF8E2.xml b/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCCFFD4FF39FF5DA04CF8E2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..976ab0ceb5e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCCFFD4FF39FF5DA04CF8E2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ + + + +Review of the grass-feeding leafhopper genera Miradeltaphus Dash & Viraktamath and Yua namia Zhang & Duan (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae: Deltocephalini) + + + +Author + +Duan, Yani + + + +Author + +Dietrich, Christopher H. + + + +Author + +Zhang, Yalin + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4098 + + +1 + + +158 +166 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4098.1.7 +30390a00-5c2f-4c83-a26f-c2792d763158 +1175-5326 +259760 +5FAE6715-E013-4890-B242-2DDB0688AE55 + + + + + + + +Miradeltaphus sanogae + +sp. n. + + + + +( +Figs. 1–2 +) + + + + +Length. Male: +4.3mm +. + + +Description. +Ground color stramineous marked with orange and brown; dorsum with pair of orange longitudinal submedial bands extended from crown apex to scutellum. Fore margin of head white bordered with dark brown, crown apex with three pairs of irregular brown spots between midline and eyes, largest near midline, coronal suture dark brown ( +Fig. 1 +A); face mostly brown, with paired white arcs ( +Fig. 1 +C). Pronotum with two pairs of longitudinal bands laterad of submedial bands, midline of pronotum and scutellum brown ( +Fig. 1 +A). Forewing light brown with veins contrastingly pale. Legs light brown with few darker transverse bands on femora ( +Figs. 1 +A– B). + + +Head wider than pronotum, crown depressed, anterior margin distinctly angulate in dorsal view, slightly shorter than minimum distance between eyes; ocellus closely adjacent to and nearly touching eye; antenna longer than head width ( +Figs. 1 +A–B); anteclypeus parallel-sided, not extended to ventral margin of face; lorum semicircular, slightly narrower than anteclypeus, well separated from lateral margin of face ( +Fig. 1 +C). Forewing with anterior branches of vein R not strongly reflexed; with four apical and three anteapical cells, apical cells shorter than half length of anteapical cells, inner anteapical cell very long; claval veins connected to each other by one or more crossveins or confluent for short distance, vein Pcu connected to claval suture by crossvein; appendix present but narrow ( +Figs. 1 +A–B). Front femur with AM1 seta large, stout, situated at mid-height of apex, intercalary row with ~8 fine pale setae, row AV with ~16 short, stout, slightly curved setae in basal half; tibia rows AD and PD each with 4 macrosetae. +Hind +femur macrosetal formula 2+2+1, tibia rows PD, AD and AV with 9, 9 and 11 macrosetae, respectively; AD and PD with 0–5 and 1–4 shorter setae between successive macrosetae; PD with intercalary setae longer than those in AD; row PV with ~37 fine, close-set setae; tarsomere I with 2 ventral longitudinal rows well differentiated, pecten with 2 platellae. + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Miradeltaphus sanogae + + +sp. n. + +A: habitus, dorsal view; B: habitus, lateral view; C: face. + + + +Male genitalia. +Pygofer lobes fused dorsomedially for considerable distance near base, forming long, unbroken tergite ( +Fig. 2 +B); lobes without processes, with numerous macrosetae in posteroventral region ( +Figs. 2 +A– B). Valve and subgenital plates fused ( +Fig. 2 +C). Subgenital plates shorter than pygofer, fused in basal half with uniseriate row of marginal macrosetae ( +Fig. 2 +C). Style with long articulatory arm, preapical lobe poorly developed and broadly rounded, apex with pair of short lateral projections and elongate distal spine ( +Fig. 2 +D). Connective elongate, slender ( +Figs. 2 +E–F). Aedeagal shaft in lateral view curved slightly dorsad, wide near base, narrowed distally, with short, compressed, falcate ventral process just distad of gonopore; shaft in ventral view nearly parallel-sided, abruptly narrowed at gonopore, with pair of short, triangular dorsal projections laterad of gonopore, elongate distal process with lateral branches longer than half length of stem ( +Figs. 2 +E–G). + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Miradeltaphus sanogae + + +sp. n. + +A: male pygofer lobe, lateral view; B: male pygofer and segments X–XI, dorsal view; C: fused valve and subgenital plates, ventral view; D: style, dorsal view; E, F: connective and aedeagus, dorsal and lateral view, respectively; G: apex of aedeagus, dorsal view. + + + + +Material examined. +Holotype +♂, +Thailand +: Chaiyaphum, Pa Hin Ngam NP Dry dipterocarp, +15° 38.099'N +, +101° 23.921'E +, +698m +, Malaise trap, +24–30 viii 2006 +, Katae Sanog & Buakaw Adnafai, leg T451. + + + + +Etymology. +This species is named for Katae Sanog who collected the +type +specimen with Buakaw Adnafai. + + + + +Remarks. +This species closely resembles the +type +species of the genus, + +M +. +mirabilis +Dash & Viraktamath + +in size, external morphology, color pattern and male genitalia, but is readily distinguishable by the unique shape of the style apex and the presence of a short, ventral keel-like projection near the apex of the aedeagal shaft. Comparison of the two species indicates that some features mentioned in the genus description by +Dash and Viraktamath (1995) +are variable within the genus. These include the veins of the forewing clavus, which are separate throughout their length in + +M +. +mirabilis + +but confluent for a short distance preapically in + +M +. +sanogae + +. Also, + +M +. +mirabilis + +was reported to have three platellae at the apex of hind tarsomere I, but + +M +. +sanogae + +has only two. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCFFFD6FF39F929A193F81C.xml b/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCFFFD6FF39F929A193F81C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..409231d1339 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCFFFD6FF39F929A193F81C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Review of the grass-feeding leafhopper genera Miradeltaphus Dash & Viraktamath and Yua namia Zhang & Duan (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae: Deltocephalini) + + + +Author + +Duan, Yani + + + +Author + +Dietrich, Christopher H. + + + +Author + +Zhang, Yalin + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4098 + + +1 + + +158 +166 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4098.1.7 +30390a00-5c2f-4c83-a26f-c2792d763158 +1175-5326 +259760 +5FAE6715-E013-4890-B242-2DDB0688AE55 + + + + + + +Key to species of + +Miradeltaphus +Dash & Viraktamath + +(males) + + + + + + + + +1. Style without projections, apex blunt ( +Dash & Viraktamath (1995) +, Figs. 7, 8). Aedeagus with lateral preapical processes long and slender, without ventral preapical process ( +Dash & Viraktamath (1995) +, Figs. 9, 10).... + +M +. +mirabilis +Dash & Viraktamath + + + + + +- Style with projections, apex acuminate ( +Fig. 2 +D). Aedeagus with lateral preapical processes short and finlike, keel-shaped ventral preapical process present ( +Fig. 2 +F)........................................................ + +M +. +sanogae + + +sp. n. + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCFFFD6FF39FB60A062F91B.xml b/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCFFFD6FF39FB60A062F91B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..20bc901c52f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCFFFD6FF39FB60A062F91B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ + + + +Review of the grass-feeding leafhopper genera Miradeltaphus Dash & Viraktamath and Yua namia Zhang & Duan (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae: Deltocephalini) + + + +Author + +Duan, Yani + + + +Author + +Dietrich, Christopher H. + + + +Author + +Zhang, Yalin + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4098 + + +1 + + +158 +166 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4098.1.7 +30390a00-5c2f-4c83-a26f-c2792d763158 +1175-5326 +259760 +5FAE6715-E013-4890-B242-2DDB0688AE55 + + + + + + + +Miradeltaphus +Dash & Viraktamath + + + + + + + + + +Miradeltaphus + +Dash & Viraktamath, 1995 +: 38 + + +. +Type +species: + +Miradeltaphus mirabilis +Dash & Viraktamath, 1995 + +. + + + + + +Diagnosis. +This genus may be separated from other +Deltocephalini +by the following combination of features: crown depressed and angulately produced with pair of orange longitudinal stripes extended across pronotum to scutellum; ocellus nearly touching eye; front tibia with dorsal setal rows 4+4; forewing with 0–2 extra crossveins; male pygofer lobe without process or teeth; subgenital plates fused to valve and to each other through most of length; style elongate with preapical lobe vestigial; aedeagus with pair of processes laterad of gonopore and slender apical extension arising ventrad of gonopore. + + + + +Distribution. +India +, +Thailand +. + + + + +Remarks. +Inclusion of the new species described below does not require significant expansion of the genus concept established by +Dash & Viraktamath (1995) +, although the leg chaetotaxy and structure of the style are more variable than indicated in their genus description (see Description and Remarks below). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCFFFD6FF39FF13A193FBD1.xml b/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCFFFD6FF39FF13A193FBD1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8a1a340c564 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7A/87/377A87ACFFCFFFD6FF39FF13A193FBD1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ + + + +Review of the grass-feeding leafhopper genera Miradeltaphus Dash & Viraktamath and Yua namia Zhang & Duan (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae: Deltocephalini) + + + +Author + +Duan, Yani + + + +Author + +Dietrich, Christopher H. + + + +Author + +Zhang, Yalin + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2016 + +4098 + + +1 + + +158 +166 + + + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.4098.1.7 +30390a00-5c2f-4c83-a26f-c2792d763158 +1175-5326 +259760 +5FAE6715-E013-4890-B242-2DDB0688AE55 + + + + + + +Key to Oriental and Palearctic genera of +Deltocephalini +(males) + + + + + + + + +1. Posterior margin of pygofer lobe pectinate................................................... + +Ctenurella +Vilbaste + + + + +- Posterior margin of pygofer lobe entire, unmodified........................................................... 2 + + + + + +2. Pygofer lobe with elongate dorsal process arising near base and extended distad................... + +Paramesodes +Ishihara + + + + +- Pygofer lobe without elongate dorsal process (one or more small teeth or internal sclerotized ridges may be present)........ 3 + + + + +3. Aedeagal shaft very elongate, more than 1½ times length of connective, without preapical processes.................... 4 + + +- Aedeagal shaft short to moderately long, less than 1½ times length of connective, with or without preapical processes...... 6 + + + + + +4. Subgenital plate and pygofer very long............................................... + +Wyushinamia +Zhang & Duan + + + + +- Subgenital plate and pygofer not elongated.................................................................. 5 + + + + + +5. Forewing with numerous extra crossveins in corium and clavus, apex of aedeagus entire................ + +Polyamia +DeLong + + + + + +- Forewing with, at most, 1–2 extra crossveins; apex of aedeagus bifid......................... + +Yuanamia +Zhang & Duan + + + + + + +6. Aedeagal shaft with paired processes....................................................................... 7 + + +- Aedeagal shaft without paired processes (apex may be bifid)................................................... 10 + + + + +7. Aedeagal processes arising basad of gonopore............................................................... 8 + + +- Aedeagal processes arising laterad or distad of gonopore....................................................... 9 + + + + + +8. Aedeagal processes short, toothlike, apex of shaft extended well beyond gonopore................... +Peitouellus +Vilbaste + + + + +- Aedeagal processes long, spinelike, apex of shaft terminating at gonopore......................... + +Alobaldia +Emeljanov + + + + + + + +9. Aedeagal processes serrate............................................................. + +Maiestas +Distant + +(part) + + + + +- Aedeagal processes entire................................................... + +Miradeltaphus +Dash & Viraktamath + + + + + + + +10. Aedeagal shaft strongly compressed over distal two-thirds, apex with ventral asymmetrical spine.... + +Matsumuratettix +Metcalf + + + + +- Aedeagal shaft tubular, symmetrical, without distal spine...................................................... 11 + + + + + +11. Forewing usually with extra crossveins in clavus; aedeagal shaft with median apical notch in ventral view...... + +Endria + +Oman + + + + +- Forewing without extra crossveins in clavus; aedeagal shaft apex without median notch in ventral view................................................................................................... ( + +Deltocephalus + +group) 12 + + + + + + +12. Aedeagal shaft with apex in lateral view bluntly rounded................................... + +Deltocephalus +Burmeister + + + + +- Aedeagal shaft with apex in lateral view terminating in sharp point.............................................. 13 + + + + + +13. Aedeagal shaft with slender ventroapical spine much narrower than shaft in lateral view.................. + +Recilia +Edwards + + + + + +- Aedeagal shaft slender and tapered throughout length in lateral view, without ventral spine narrower than shaft............................................................................................... + +Maiestas +Distant + +(part) + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7A/C8/377AC864E9B9529368FB13EC933754EE.xml b/data/37/7A/C8/377AC864E9B9529368FB13EC933754EE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..46a57ddbe98 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7A/C8/377AC864E9B9529368FB13EC933754EE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Gambrus bipunctatus (Tschek, 1872) + + + + +Cryptus bipunctatus +Tschek, 1872 + + +ornatus +misident.; +Schwarz and Shaw (1998) + + +maculatus +Brischke, 1888 synonymy by +Schwarz (2005) + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales + + +Notes + +Added by +Schwarz and Shaw (1998) +and transferred from +Aritranis +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7B/13/377B13C8F98209547FF729412567D284.xml b/data/37/7B/13/377B13C8F98209547FF729412567D284.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a132137f801 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7B/13/377B13C8F98209547FF729412567D284.xml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ + + + +Updated list of the mosquitoes of Colombia (Diptera: Culicidae) + + + +Author + +Rozo-Lopez, Paula + + + +Author + +Mengual, Ximo + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +4567 +4567 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4567 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4567 +1314-2828--4567 + + + + +Culex (Culex) spinosus Lutz, 1905 + + + +Notes + +Knight and Stone 1977 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7B/98/377B98EF27AB5DED8872A180FEF459D6.xml b/data/37/7B/98/377B98EF27AB5DED8872A180FEF459D6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d132db275e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7B/98/377B98EF27AB5DED8872A180FEF459D6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ + + + +Genus-level revision of the Alycaeidae (Gastropoda, Cyclophoroidea), with an annotated species catalogue + + + +Author + +Pall-Gergely, Barna +Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Herman Otto ut 15, Budapest, H- 1022, Hungary +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6167-7221 +pallgergely2@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Sajan, Sheikh +Zoological Survey of India, Prani Vigyan Bhawan, M Block, New Alipore, Kolkata 700053, West Bengal, India & Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 002, Uttarakhand, India +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2785-6824 + + + +Author + +Tripathy, Basudev +Zoological Survey of India, Prani Vigyan Bhawan, M Block, New Alipore, Kolkata 700053, West Bengal, India + + + +Author + +Meng, Kaibaryer +National Zoological Museum of China, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China + + + +Author + +Asami, Takahiro +Department of Biology, Shinshu University, Matsumoto 390 - 8621, Japan +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5706-0272 + + + +Author + +Ablett, Jonathan D. +Mollusca Section, Invertebrates Division, Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museums, London SW 7 5 BD, United Kingdom + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +981 + + +1 +220 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.981.53583 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.981.53583 +1313-2970-981-1 +5194AAC86B8A473F8A41470A60182A0B +7C44C797C4125A71BAE032A55E6FA5DC + + + + +Dicharax (?) kiuchii (Minato & Abe, 1982) + + + + +Cipangocharax kiuchii +Minato & Abe, 1982: 200-202, figs 1-8. + + +Cipangocharax kiuchii +- +Azuma 1982 +: 13; +Minato 1988 +: 17; +Minato 1993 +: 1, figs 1, 7. + + + +Type locality. +"Near Toogen cave, Mt. Hizuka, Takano, Kisawa-son, Naga-gun, Tokushima-ken, Japan". + + +Material examined. + +NSMT-Mo 59545 (holotype); +徳島縣 +1那賀郡木沢村高野 (Tokushima-ken, Naka-gun, Kisawa-son, Takano = Tokushima Prefecture, Naka County, Kisawa Village, Takano), Sakurai coll., NSMT-Mo 79093 (3 shells). + + + +Remarks. + +Protoconch similar to that of + +biexcisus + +; R2 with 16, widely spaced, low, blunt ribs; spaces as wide as or slightly wider (at the edge of the body whorl) than individual ribs; in the case of the three shells in the Sakurai collection some of the ribs on R2 are joined to the neighbouring ones near the tube; no spiral lines visible on R1. Operculum relatively slim with low outer belt and without nipple (see also original description). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7B/9A/377B9A7B269D507C964205A1516A8D2F.xml b/data/37/7B/9A/377B9A7B269D507C964205A1516A8D2F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b66ba427c4d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7B/9A/377B9A7B269D507C964205A1516A8D2F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,875 @@ + + + +Underestimated species diversity within the Rhacophorus rhodopus and Rhacophorus bipunctatus complexes (Anura, Rhacophoridae), with a description of a new species from Hainan, China + + + +Author + +Tang, Shangjing +https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0706-421X +Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guilin 541004, China + + + +Author + +Xiao, Fanrong +Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal Ecology, College of Life Science, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China + + + +Author + +Liu, Shuo +0000-0001-7825-3006 +Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands & Key Laboratory of Tropical Animal and Plant Ecology of Hainan Province, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China + + + +Author + +Wang, Lijun +Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal Ecology, College of Life Science, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China + + + +Author + +Yu, Guohua +Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guilin 541004, China + + + +Author + +Du, Lina +0000-0002-2246-643X +Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guilin 541004, China + +text + + +Zoosystematics and Evolution + + +2024 + +2024-05-21 + + +100 + + +2 + + +625 +643 + + + +journal article +10.3897/zse.100.118879 +675CD047-159E-4363-A0A6-ECD9549A989B + + + + + +Rhacophorus qiongica + +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 6 +, +7 +, +8 +, +9 + + + + + + + +Rhacophorus rhodopus + +— + +Fei 1999 + + +; +Fei et al. 2004 +, +2009 +, +2010 +, +2012 +; +Shi 2011 +; +Nguyen et al. 2014 +. + + + + + + +Rhacophorus bipunctatus + +— +Orlov et al. 2002 + +. + + + + + +Type material. + + + + + +Holotype + +. + + +GXNU + +YU 000691 +, adult +male +, collected on + +14 July 2023 + +by +Lingyun Du +from +Diaoluo Mt. +, +Lingshui +, +Hainan +, +China +( + +18 ° 43 ' 28 " N +, +109 ° 52 ' 12 " E + +, ca + +914 m +a. s. l. + +). + + + + + +Paratypes + +. + + +GXNU + +YU +000690, an adult male, collected at the same time as the +holotype +from the type locality by Lingyun Du and Jiaqi Luo; + +GXNU + +HN 110501 ‒ HN 110503, +three adult +males, collected on +20 July 2021 +by Fanrong Xiao from the type locality; and +three adult +males ( + +GXNU + +YU +000693, + +GXNU + +YU +000696, + +GXNU + +YU +000697) and an adult female ( + +GXNU + +YU +000698) collected on +11 July 2023 +by Qiumei Mo and Chunyi Pang from Yinggeling, +Hainan +, +China +( + +19 ° 2 ' 24 " N +, +109 ° 34 ' 12 " E + +, ca +670 m +a. s. l.). + + + + +Etymology. + + +The specific name +qiongica +is derived from Qiong (琼), referring to +Hainan +, +China +, and meaning good and beautiful in Chinese. The specific name means that this species is very beautiful, and in +China +, it is distributed in +Hainan +. We suggest the English common name “ +Hainan +flying frog ” and the Chinese common name “ 琼树蛙 (Qióng Shù Wā) ”. + + + + +Diagnosis. + + +The new species is assigned to + +Rhacophorus + +by the presence of intercalary cartilage between terminal and penultimate phalanges of digits, terminal phalanges of fingers and toes Y-shaped, the tip of the digits expanded into disks with circummarginal grooves, fingers webbed, tarsal projections present, dermal folds along the forearm and tarsus present, and a horizontal pupil ( +Jiang et al. 2019 +). + +Rhacophorus qiongica + +sp. nov. +differs from its congeners by a combination of the following characters: 1) medium body size (adult males +SVL +35.1‒38.2 mm +); 2) dorsal surface red brown; 3) entire web between fingers and toes; 4) webbing between toes purely scarlet; 5) small black blotches on flank; 6) bands on limbs distinct; 7) throat smooth; 8) absence of dermal appendage on snout tip; 9) absence of small black spots on head sides; 10) palm smooth without small tubercles; and 11) tibiotarsal articulation reaching beyond eye. + + + + + +Description of +holotype +. + + + +Adult male, body size medium ( + +SVL + +37.8 mm +); head width ( + +HW + +13.2 mm +) longer than head length ( +HL +12.0 mm); snout blunt pointed, sloping in profile, protruding beyond the margin of lower jaw in ventral view; snout length ( +SL +5.5 mm +) longer than diameter of eye ( + +ED + +4.4 mm +); canthus rostralis distinct, curved; loreal region oblique, concave; nostril oval, lateral, slightly protuberant, slightly closer to tip of snout than to eye; internarial space ( + +IND + +3.8 mm +slightly smaller than interorbital distance ( + +IOD + +4.2 mm +), nearly equal to the width of the upper eyelid ( + +UEW + +3.6 mm +); pupil horizontal; pineal ocellus absent; tympanum distinct ( + +TD + +2.3 mm +), rounded, about half eye diameter ( + +ED + +4.4 mm +); supratympanic fold narrow, flat; tongue cordiform, attached anteriorly, notably notched posteriorly; choanae oval; vomerine teeth present in two series, touching the inner front edges of the choanae; an internal single subgular vocal sac; a vocal sac opening on the floor of the mouth at each corner. + + +Forelimbs thin, length of forearm and hand ( + +FHL + +18.2 mm +) is about half snout-vent length; relative length of fingers I <II <IV <III; tips of all fingers expand into discs with circummarginal and transverse ventral grooves, disc of finger I smaller than discs of other fingers; entire web between fingers, webbing formula: I 2‒2 II 1 ‒ 1.5 III 1 ‒ 1 IV; subarticular tubercles rounded and prominent, formula 1, 1, 2, 2, proximal one smaller than distal one on the third and fourth fingers; supernumerary tubercles below the base of finger absent; metacarpal tubercle single, inner, oval and prominent (Fig. +7 +). + + +Hindlimbs slender and long, heels overlapping when legs at right angle to body, tibiotarsal articulation reaching beyond eye; tibia length ( +TL +18.6 mm +) nearly equal to length of forearm and hand ( + +FHL + +18.2 mm +), longer than foot length ( + +FL + +16.7 mm +), and shorter than length of tarsus and foot ( + +TFL + +25.6 mm +); relative length of toes I <II <III < +V +<IV; tips of all toes expanded into discs with circummarginal and transverse ventral grooves; entire web between toes, webbing formula I 1‒1 II 1 ‒ 1 III 1 ‒ 1 IV 1 ‒ 1 +V +; subarticular tubercles rounded and prominent, formula 1, 1, 2, 3, 2; supernumerary tubercles absent; single inner metatarsal tubercle, oval (Fig. +7 +). + + +Dorsal skin smooth with very fine granules; throat and ventral surface of forelimbs smooth; chest, belly, and ventral surface of thighs granular (Figs +6 +, +7 +); dermal folds on forearm, tarsus, heels, and vent present. + + + + + + +Lateral, dorsal, and ventral views of the holotype of + +R. qiongica + +sp. nov. +( +GXNU +YU 000691) in life. + + + + + + + +Dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the holotype of + +R. qiongica + +sp. nov. +( +a ‒ c +) in preservative and ventral views of its hand ( +d +) and foot ( +e +). + + + + + +Coloration in life. + +Iris light brown; dorsal surface red brown, mottled with two discontinued rows of dark patches and scattered with small black spots on dorsum; dark brown bands and small black spots on dorsal surface of limbs; upper part of flank orange red and lower part of flank orange yellow, scattered with a few small black blotches; skin of ventral surface semi-transparent, mottled with orange yellow on throat and belly; ventral, anterior, and posterior surfaces of limbs orange yellow; discs of fingers and dorsal surface of fingers I ‒ III orange yellow; discs of toes and toes I ‒ IV red; web between fingers yellow, mottled with red; web between toes completely red. + + + + +Color of +holotype +in preservative. + + +The color faded, but the pattern remained the same as in life. Dorsal surface brown, with dark patches and spots; dorsal side of limbs barred with dark brown; throat, chest, belly, webbing, ventral surface of limbs, and anterior and posterior parts of thighs faded to yellowish; a few small black blotches on flank. + + + +Sexual dimorphism. + +The body size of males is smaller than that of female; adult males have an internal single subgular vocal sac with a pair of slit-like openings on the floor of the mouth at each corner. Additionally, adult males have a milk-white nuptial pad on the inner side of the base of finger I. + + + +Morphological variation. + + +The number of small black spots on the flank varied among specimens. The +holotype + +GXNU + +YU +000691 and +two paratypes +( + +GXNU + +YU +000698 and + +GXNU + +HN 110502) have multiple small black spots on flank; +paratypes + +GXNU + +YU +000690 and + +GXNU + +YU +000697 have no black spots on flank; and +paratypes + +GXNU + +YU +000693 and + +GXNU + +YU +000696 have two small black spots on flank (Fig. +8 +). Additionally, dorsal color pattern also varied among specimens, as the +two paratypes + +GXNU + +YU +000696 and + +GXNU + +YU +000698 have yellowish-brown blotches on dorsal surfaces of the body and limbs (Fig. +9 +). + + + + + + +Variation of black spots on flank among paratypes of + +R. qiongica + +sp. nov. +from Hainan, China. + + + + + + + +Dorsal view of paratypes +GXNU +YU 000696 ( +a +) and +GXNU +YU 000698 ( +b +) in life. + + + + + +Distribution and ecology. + + +The species is distributed in +Hainan +, +China +and +Gia Lai +, +Vietnam +. In Hainan, the species was found usually in shrubs and small arbors at elevations ranging from +600 to 850 m +( +Shi 2011 +; as + +R. rhodopus + +) and called from 19: 00 to 03: 00 every night during the breeding season (from May to July), with a peak at about 22: 00 ( +Sun et al. 2017 +; as + +R. rhodopus + +). The +types +in this study were found in roadside bushes ca. +1‒2 m +above the ground (Fig. +10 +). There were temporary puddles under the bushes, and there is a lake (Tianchi) and a stream nearby the road in the +type +locality. + +Chirixalus doriae +Boulenger, 1893 + +, + +Kurixalus hainanus +( +Zhao, Wang & Shi, 2005 +) + +, and + +Polypedates megacephalus +Hallowell, 1861 + +were also found in sympatry at the +type +locality. + + + + + + +Habitat of + +R. qiongica + +sp. nov. +at the type locality. + + + + + +Comparisons. + + +Currently, there are three known species in the + +R. rhodopus + +and + +R. bipunctatus + +complexes, namely + +R. bipunctatus + +, + +R. napoensis + +, and + +R. rhodopus + +. The new species differs from + +R. bipunctatus + +by smaller body size (male +SVL +35.1‒38.2 mm +, n = 8 vs. +37.8‒50.4 mm +, n = 28; Table +7 +), dorsal surface red brown (vs. green; Fig. +11 +), spots on flanks small (vs. large; Fig. +11 b +), bands on limbs distinct (vs. indistinct), and throat smooth (vs. granular; +Bordoloi et al. 2007 +); from + +R. napoensis + +by smaller body size (male +SVL +35.1‒38.2 mm +[37.1 ± 1.3, n = 8] vs. +39.7‒44.2 mm +[41.3 ± 1.8, n = 5]), snout pointed without dermal appendage on tip (vs. snout pointed with a dermal appendage on tip; Fig. +11 +), black spots on flanks small (vs. large; Fig. +11 +), and throat smooth (vs. granular; Fig. +11 +); and from + +R. rhodopus + +(Clade C) by black spots on axillar and flanks small (vs. usually large), absence of small black spots on head sides (vs. present; Fig. +12 +), palm smooth without small tubercles (vs. palm rough with rows of small tubercles; Fig. +12 +), smaller tympanum, wider upper eyelid, larger distance between nostril and eye (Table +4 +), and tibiotarsal articulation reaching beyond eye (vs. tibiotarsal articulation reaching eye). + + + + + + +Morphological comparison between the new species and members of + +Rhacophorus rhodopus + +and + +R. bipunctatus + +complexes. Characters are: ① dorsal color: 0 = brown, 1 = green; ② black spots on flank: 0 = small, 1 = large; ③ bands on limbs: 0 = distinct, 1 = indistinct; ④ throat: 0 = smooth, 1 = granular; ⑤ snout: 0 = pointed without appendage on tip, 1 = pointed with appendage on tip; ⑥ black spots on head side: 0 = absent, 1 = present; ⑦ palm: 0 = smooth without tubercles, 1 = rough with tubercles; ⑧ tibiotarsal articulation: 0 = reaching beyond eye, 1 = reaching eye. “? ” means unknown. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Species +Male +SVL +①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧
+ +R. qiongica + +sp. nov. +35.1–38.2 (37.1 ± 1.3, n = 8)00000000
+ +R. rhodopus + +33.1–38.7 (35.3 ± 2.3, n = 6)01000111
+ +R. bipunctatus + +37.8–50.4 (n = 28)11110?00
+ +R. napoensis + +39.7–44.2 (41.3 ± 1.8, n = 5)01011110
+ + + + + + +Dorsal ( +a. +BMNH 1872.4. 17.127, lectophoront from Khasi Hills, India) and lateral ( +b. +CAS 229893, collected from Putao, Kachin State, Myanmar) views of + +R. bipunctatus + +, throat ( +c +) and lateral view ( +d +) of + +R. napoensis + +( +GXNU +YU 000170), and throat ( +e +) and lateral view ( +f +) of + +R. qiongica + +sp. nov. +( +GXNU +YU 000693). The images of +a +and +b +were reproduced from +Bordoloi et al. (2007) +and +Wilkinson et al. (2005) +, respectively. + + + + + + + +Head side and ventral surface of the hand of + +R. rhodopus + +( +a, b. +GXNU +YU 090186) and + +R. qiongica + +sp. nov. +( +c, d. +GXNU +YU 000693). + + + +Both the present and previous phylogenetic analyses revealed that + +R. norhayatiae + +, + +R. reinwardtii + +, + +R. kio + +, + +R. borneensis + +, and + +R. helenae + +are imbedded in the + +R. rhodopus + +and + +R. bipunctatus + +complexes. The new species can be easily distinguished from these five species by the dorsal surface being red brown (vs. green) and the web between toes being red with no black pigmentation (vs. black pigmentation present). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7B/9F/377B9F9B7CDA9D7326A0FE0C6749B11E.xml b/data/37/7B/9F/377B9F9B7CDA9D7326A0FE0C6749B11E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b0cb7e0fd0a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7B/9F/377B9F9B7CDA9D7326A0FE0C6749B11E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,376 @@ + + + +A taxonomic monograph of the assassin bug genus Zelus Fabricius (Hemiptera: Reduviidae): 71 species based on 10,000 specimens + + + +Author + +Zhang, Guanyang + + + +Author + +Hart, Elwood R + + + +Author + +Weirauch, Christiane + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8150 +8150 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8150 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8150 +1314-2828-4-8150 +262DB958242246B692E61675C3C07DB1 +262DB958242246B692E61675C3C07DB1 + + + + +Zelus kartaboides Zhang & Hart +sp. n. + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Holotype +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +UCR_ENT 00071182 +; occurrenceRemarks: Holotype of Zeluskartaboides Zhang & Hart, 2016; recordedBy: +Richter +; sex: +Adult Male +; Taxon: scientificName: Zeluskartaboides; family: Reduviidae; genus: Zelus; scientificNameAuthorship: Zhang and Hart, 2016; Location: country: +COLOMBIA +; stateProvince: Meta; locality: +Rio Guayuriba +; verbatimElevation: +400 m +; decimalLatitude: +4.01978 +; decimalLongitude: +-73.60807 +; georeferenceSources: Google Earth; Identification: identifiedBy: +G. Zhang +; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: eventDate: +1947-09-06 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +TAMU + + +Type status: +Paratype +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +UCR_ENT 00042153 +; occurrenceRemarks: Paratype of Zeluskartaboides Zhang & Hart, 2016; recordedBy: +C. Lindemann +; sex: +Adult Male +; Taxon: scientificName: Zeluskartaboides; family: Reduviidae; genus: Zelus; scientificNameAuthorship: Zhang and Hart, 2016; Location: country: +BRAZIL +; stateProvince: Amazonas; locality: +Tapurucuara Rio Negro +; decimalLatitude: +-0.4 +; decimalLongitude: +-65.0333 +; georeferenceSources: Gazetteer; Identification: identifiedBy: +G. Zhang +; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: eventDate: +1963-02-22 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +ZSM + + +Type status: +Paratype +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +UCR_ENT 00017890 +; occurrenceRemarks: Paratype of Zeluskartaboides Zhang & Hart, 2016; recordedBy: +D. Engleman +; sex: +Adult Male +; Taxon: scientificName: Zeluskartaboides; family: Reduviidae; genus: Zelus; scientificNameAuthorship: Zhang and Hart, 2016; Location: country: +BRAZIL +; stateProvince: Mato Grosso; locality: +Mato Gr. +; decimalLatitude: +-10.41666 +; decimalLongitude: +-59.46667 +; georeferenceSources: Label; Identification: identifiedBy: +G. Zhang +; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: eventDate: +1977-03-17 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +AMNH + + +Type status: +Paratype +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +UCR_ENT 00046978 +; occurrenceRemarks: Paratype of Zeluskartaboides Zhang & Hart, 2016; recordedBy: +D. Engleman +; sex: +Adult Male +; Taxon: scientificName: Zeluskartaboides; family: Reduviidae; genus: Zelus; scientificNameAuthorship: Zhang and Hart, 2016; Location: country: +BRAZIL +; stateProvince: Mato Grosso; locality: +Mato Gr. +; decimalLatitude: +-10.41666 +; decimalLongitude: +-59.46667 +; georeferenceSources: Label; Identification: identifiedBy: +G. Zhang +; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: eventDate: +1977-03-17 +to +1977-03-22 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +AMNH + + +Type status: +Paratype +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +UCR_ENT 00046982 +; occurrenceRemarks: Paratype of Zeluskartaboides Zhang & Hart, 2016; recordedBy: +D. Engleman +; sex: +Adult Male +; Taxon: scientificName: Zeluskartaboides; family: Reduviidae; genus: Zelus; scientificNameAuthorship: Zhang and Hart, 2016; Location: country: +BRAZIL +; stateProvince: Mato Grosso; locality: +Mato Gr. +; decimalLatitude: +-10.41666 +; decimalLongitude: +-59.46667 +; georeferenceSources: Label; Identification: identifiedBy: +G. Zhang +; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: eventDate: +1977-03-17 +to +1977-03-22 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +AMNH + + +Type status: +Paratype +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +UCR_ENT 00047047 +; occurrenceRemarks: Paratype of Zeluskartaboides Zhang & Hart, 2016; recordedBy: +M. Alvarenga +; sex: +Adult Male +; Taxon: scientificName: Zeluskartaboides; family: Reduviidae; genus: Zelus; scientificNameAuthorship: Zhang and Hart, 2016; Location: country: +BRAZIL +; stateProvince: Para; locality: +Tucurui +; decimalLatitude: +-3.7 +; decimalLongitude: +-49.7 +; georeferenceSources: Gazetteer; Identification: identifiedBy: +G. Zhang +; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: eventDate: +1979-01-01 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +AMNH + + +Type status: +Paratype +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +UCR_ENT 00017862 +; occurrenceRemarks: Paratype of Zeluskartaboides Zhang & Hart, 2016; recordedBy: +Richter +; sex: +Adult Male +; Taxon: scientificName: Zeluskartaboides; family: Reduviidae; genus: Zelus; scientificNameAuthorship: Zhang and Hart, 2016; Location: country: +COLOMBIA +; stateProvince: Meta; locality: +Rio Guayeriba, a triburary of Rio Meta +; Identification: identifiedBy: +G. Zhang +; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: eventDate: +1948-05-17 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +AMNH + + +Type status: +Paratype +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +UCR_ENT 00071183 +; occurrenceRemarks: Paratype of Zeluskartaboides Zhang & Hart, 2016; recordedBy: +Richter +; sex: +Adult Male +; Taxon: scientificName: Zeluskartaboides; family: Reduviidae; genus: Zelus; scientificNameAuthorship: Zhang and Hart, 2016; Location: country: +COLOMBIA +; stateProvince: Meta; locality: +Cano Grande +; verbatimElevation: +490 m +; Identification: identifiedBy: +G. Zhang +; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: eventDate: +1948-01-20 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +TAMU + + +Type status: +Paratype +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +UCR_ENT 00071184 +; occurrenceRemarks: Paratype of Zeluskartaboides Zhang & Hart, 2016; recordedBy: +Richter +; sex: +Adult Male +; Taxon: scientificName: Zeluskartaboides; family: Reduviidae; genus: Zelus; scientificNameAuthorship: Zhang and Hart, 2016; Location: country: +COLOMBIA +; stateProvince: unknown; locality: +Buena Vista +; verbatimElevation: +1300 m +; Identification: identifiedBy: +G. Zhang +; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: eventDate: +1944-02-06 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +TAMU + + +Type status: +Paratype +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +UCR_ENT 00009521 +; occurrenceRemarks: Paratype of Zeluskartaboides Zhang & Hart, 2016. Drake Collection; recordedBy: +L. Pena +; sex: +Adult Male +; Taxon: scientificName: Zeluskartaboides; family: Reduviidae; genus: Zelus; scientificNameAuthorship: Zhang and Hart, 2016; Location: country: +ECUADOR +; stateProvince: Sucumbios; locality: +Dureno +; verbatimElevation: +150 m +; decimalLatitude: +0.0444 +; decimalLongitude: +-76.6972 +; georeferenceSources: Gazetteer; Identification: identifiedBy: +G. Zhang +; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: eventDate: +1977-23-09 +to +1977-09-30 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +USNM + + +Type status: +Paratype +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +UCR_ENT 00019083 +; occurrenceRemarks: Paratype of Zeluskartaboides Zhang & Hart, 2016; recordedBy: +E. I. Schlinger & E. S. Ross +; sex: +Adult Male +; Taxon: scientificName: Zeluskartaboides; family: Reduviidae; genus: Zelus; scientificNameAuthorship: Zhang and Hart, 2016; Location: country: +PERU +; stateProvince: Huanuco; locality: +Monzon valley, Tingo Maria +; decimalLatitude: +-9.27816 +; decimalLongitude: +-76.05562 +; georeferenceSources: Google Earth; Identification: identifiedBy: +G. Zhang +; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: eventDate: +1954-10-15 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +CAS + + + + +Description +Figs 109, 110, 111 + +Male: (Fig. 109) Medium-sized, total length 11.22-11.61 mm (mean 11.6 mm, Suppl. material 2); Coloration, vestiture and structure including genitalia very similar to +Z. kartabensis +except for the following. COLORATION: Lateral surface and posterior margin of posterior pronotal lobe, and scutellum yellowish, lighter than remainder of body surface. GENITALIA: (Fig. 110) Pygophore: Posterolateral rim of pygophore in smaller angle with body long-axis in lateral view, nearly horizontal; lateral protrusion on posterodorsal rim of pygophore more pronounced, proximal side of arch extending down as process. Medial process short. Paramere: Paramere more strongly curved, banana-like; diameter uniform throughout, apex not enlarged, base slightly constricted. Phallus: Struts apically diverging, V-shaped. + +Female: Unknown. + + +Diagnosis + +The posterior margin of the pronotum and the scutellum yellowish, strongly contrasting to the remaining dark brown dorsal surface, makes this species easily recognizable among all species of +Zelus +, including the very similarly looking +Z. kartabensis +. It can also be recognized by the medial process with ridge-like medial elevation through apical 1/2 (also in +Z. kartabensis +and +Z. chamaeleon +). It is separated from +Z. kartabensis +by the paramere uniquely shaped like a banana and its diameter uniform throughout. Some specimens of +Z. armillatus +, +Z. conjungens +, +Z. longipes +and +Z. ruficeps +also exhibit a predominantly dark brown pronotum with posterior and/or dorsolateral margins yellow or orange, but they are much more larger and robust than +Z. kartaboides +and the male genitalic structures are very different. + + + +Etymology + +The specific epithet indicates that this species is rather similar to +Z. kartabensis +. + + + +Distribution +South America (Fig. 111). Countries with records: Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7B/D7/377BD70F7423BF471FEA0B30D263B5C4.xml b/data/37/7B/D7/377BD70F7423BF471FEA0B30D263B5C4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c6b35b4f2cc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7B/D7/377BD70F7423BF471FEA0B30D263B5C4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part E) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +490 +515 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Epidendrum vanilla +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 952. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in America australi." RCN: 6877. + + + +Lectotype +(Cribb in Cafferty & Jarvis in +Taxon +48: 47. 1999): [icon] " +Volubilis siliquosa Mexicana plantagini folio +" in Catesby, Nat. Hist. Carolina 2, App.: 7, t. 7. 1747. + + + + +Current name: + +Vanilla mexicana +Mill. + +( +Orchidaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7C/04/377C0471FF8A345DFF33FB40E3ADF816.xml b/data/37/7C/04/377C0471FF8A345DFF33FB40E3ADF816.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..90587081786 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7C/04/377C0471FF8A345DFF33FB40E3ADF816.xml @@ -0,0 +1,289 @@ + + + +A new Drusinae (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) species from the Zagros Mountains in the Kurdistan Province, Iran + + + +Author + +Ibrahimi, Halil +University of Prishtina “ Hasan Prishtina ”, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Department of Biology, Prishtinë, Republic of Kosovo + + + +Author + +Mohammadi, Habibollah +University of Kurdistan, Faculty of Natural Resources, Department of Fisheries Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran & University of Kurdistan, Zrebar Lake Environmental Research, Kurdistan Studies Institute, Sanandaj, Iran + + + +Author + +Ghaderi, Edris +University of Kurdistan, Faculty of Natural Resources, Department of Fisheries Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran & Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology, Gorgan, Iran + + + +Author + +Karimian, Erfan + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-02-07 + + +5406 + + +3 + + +451 +460 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5406.3.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5406.3.4 +1175-5326 +10628072 +6D969607-6BC3-467A-9D91-C08B6D6F9441 + + + + + + + +Drusus chelchamaensis +Ibrahimi & Mohammadi + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figures 2–5 +) + + + + +Type material. + + +Holotype + +(male): +Iran +, +Kurdistan Province +, +Zagros Mountain +ranges, +Chel Chama Mountain +, +Kani Chaow Rash +spring (meaning Black Eye Spring), 35.8387˚N, 46.5224˚E, + +2816 m +above sea level + +, + +24.vii.2021 + +, leg. +H. Ibrahimi +, H. +Mohammadi, E +. Karimian, and +E. Ghaderi. + + + +Paratypes + +( +2 males +): with the same label data as the holotype + +. + + + + +Distribution. +Iran +, +Kurdistan province +, Chel Chama (Chehel Cheshmeh). + + + + +Diagnosis +. The male of the new species is most similar to that of + +Drusus bayburtii +Çakin 1983 + +(known from many places in +Antalia +, +Turkey +), + +D. ketes +Oláh & Mey 2017 + +(in + +Oláh +et al +. 2017 + +) (known from the +Hamedan Province +of +Iran +), and + +D. kazanciae +Çakin 1983 + +(known from the +Hakkari Province +, +Turkey +) and differs mainly in exhibiting (1) elongate, ovate, setose lobes of superior appendages each with a triangular, blunt apex in lateral view; (2) robust, round setose lobes of superior appendages in caudal view; (3) low, robust asetose inner processes of the superior appendages in lateral view; (4) high, tapering asetose inner processes in caudal view; (5) a very long terminal part of each paramere in lateral view, 2 to 3 times longer than in + +D. bayburtii + +and 1.2 to 1.3 times longer than in + +D. ketes + +, less inflated than in both species; (6) a robust and very high principal spine of each paramere and a considerably high, single secondary spine; 7) segment IX with narrow acuminate dorsal portion and longer ventral portion, laterally even longer and convex in lateral view; (8) the spinate area of tergum VIII consisting of two nearly semicircular lobes with straight anterior bases and mesal margins, connected posteriorly by a band of scarce spines; (9) moderately long inferior appendages each with a median ventromesal incision in ventral view. + + +The + +D. bayburtii + +male has (1) subquadratic setose lobes of the superior appendages, each with an arcuate apex in lateral view; (2) slender setose lobes of the superior appendages each with a tapering apex in caudal view; (3) high, slender asetose inner processes of the superior appendages in lateral view; (4) high asetose inner processes with pointed apices in caudal view; (5) a short and inflated terminal part of each paramere; (6) a delicate principle spine on each paramere and 2 or 3 secondary spines; (7) segment IX with an acuminate dorsal portion, ventrally and laterally almost equally long in lateral view; (8) the spinate area of tergum VIII consisting of two oval lobes, with round anterior bases and connected posteriorly by a band of scarce spines; and (9) moderately long inferior appendages each with a median ventromesal incision in ventral view. + + + +FIGURES 2–6. +Male genitalia of + +Drusus chelchamaensis +Ibrahimi & Mohammadi + + +sp. nov. + +(2) left lateral; (3) dorsal; (4) left paramere, left lateral; (5) inferior appendages and segment IX, ventral; 6) superior appendages and intermediate appendages, caudal. aip = asetose inner process of a superior appendage (paired); ia = intermediate appendage (paired); ifa = inferior appendage (paired); ps = principal spine of a paramere (paired); sl = setose lobe of a superior appendage (paired); tVIII = tergite VIII; sIX = segment IX; ss = secondary spine of a paramere (paired); ssl = semicircular lobe of a spinate area (paired). Scale bar = 1 mm. + + + +The + +D. ketes + +male has (1) subquadratic setose lobes of the superior appendages, each with a longer and round dorsal half in lateral view; (2) robust, round setose lobes of superior appendages in caudal view; (3) high, slender asetose inner processes of the superior appendages in lateral view; (4) low, robust asetose inner processes in caudal view; (5) a medium-long terminal part of each paramere; (6) a long principal spine on each paramere and a small single secondary spine; (7) segment IX with acuminate dorsal portion, ventrally and laterally almost equally long in lateral view; (8) the spinate area of tergum VIII composed by two circular lobes with round anterior bases, connected posteriorly by a band of scarce spines; (9) moderately long inferior appendages each with a straight ventromesal margin in ventral view. + + +The + +D. kazanciae + +male has (1) low, elongate, subrectangular setose lobes of the superior appendages, each with a sharply angled triangular apex in lateral view; (2) slender setose lobes of the superior appendages with tapering apices in caudal view; (3) high and long asetose inner processes of the superior appendages in lateral view; (4) low asetose inner processes, each with a very long base and spine-like apex in caudal view; (5) segment IX dorsally and ventrally tapering, almost equally long throughout the remaining height in lateral view; (6) the spinate area of tergum VIII composed by two semicircular lobes with rounded anterior bases, connected posteriorly by a band of scarce spines, more dense at the posterior apex; (7) long inferior appendages each with concave ventral and dorsal margins. + + + + +Description. +General appearance +. Habitus brownish yellow, sclerites and tergites light brown with few darker patches in tergites; cephalic and thoracic setal areas pale; cephalic, thoracic, and abdominal setation blonde; legs brown to fawn, with darker areas; wings yellowish-brown, translucent, with thin blonde setae. Male maxillary palps each 3-segmented. Length of each forewing +12.2 mm +( +holotype +), 12.0– +12.5 mm +(n = 3). Spur formula 1,3,3. + + +Male genitalia. +Tergite VIII light brown ( +Fig. 3 +), with darker patches laterally below spinate areas in lateral view, pair of posterior spinate areas nearly semicircular in dorsal view, slightly incised anteromesally, anterior and mesal edges nearly straight, lateral-distal edge rounded and tapering posteromesally, with lighter areas around alveoli; lobes connected posteriorly by triangular and apically blunt band of scattered spines protruding broadly beyond semicircular lobes. Segment IX ( +Fig. 2 +) with narrow acuminate dorsal portion and longer ventral portion, laterally even longer and irregularly convex anteriorly, acute posteriorly in lateral view. Superior appendages bipartite ( +Figs 2, 3, 6 +), each consisting of setose lateral lobe and asetose dorsomesal process; setose lobe elongate, ovate, tapering to blunt apex, covered with fine setae of medium length dorsolaterally, ventral margin convex and dorsal one mostly straight in lateral view; asetose inner process short and broad with acuminate apex, originating from base of setose lobe in lateral view; setose lobe broadly connected with the asetose inner process, diverging only apically in dorsal view. Intermediate appendages ( +Fig. 2 +) much shorter than superior appendages, hidden beneath tergum IX in dorsal view and mostly hidden by superior appendages and segment IX in lateral view, apicodorsally rounded and black, caudoventrally triangular in lateral view. Inferior appendages ( +Figs 2, 5 +) subtriangular in lateral and ventral views, each twice long as longest part of segment IX in lateral aspect, with wide base and tapering apex, dorsal margin slightly concave, ventral margin slightly concave in lateral view; attached only basally, outer margin convex and slightly angled at midlength, inner margin straight basally, with median ventromesal incision, and sinuate distally in ventral view. Phallic apparatus consisting of simple long aedeagus and pair of parameres; parameres ( +Fig. 4 +) slender, each with principal spine long and triangular, secondary spine single, slightly shorter, and triangular, terminal part long and only slightly inflated before acute apex. + + +Female +, +larva +, +pupa. +Unknown. + + +Etymology. +Species epithet + +chelchamaensis + +, coined from ‘Chel Chama,’ referring to the name of the mountain where the +type +locality is located and, in the Kurdish language, meaning ‘forty springs.’ + + +Habitat. +Males of + +Drusus chelchamaensis + + +sp. nov. + +were found around the spring area of an open spring and a few meters downstream. The spring and the stream were completely surrounded by dense riparian vegetation for more than +30 m +, without signs of human activities. The substrate consisted of gravel, cobble, pebbles, and large stones; stream width was 0.5 to 0.9 meters, stream depth was +30–40 cm +. During August, when the specimens of the new species were sampled, most of the stream, except the spring source, was covered by vegetation and with flowing water visible only at a few segments. The following physico-chemical parameters were observed at the sampling site on +24.vii.2021 +: water temperature 2°C, electrical conductivity 57 +µS/cm +, and dissolved oxygen +8.59 mg +/l. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7C/49/377C4944B1F65165B32CC53AE43EA2FB.xml b/data/37/7C/49/377C4944B1F65165B32CC53AE43EA2FB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ddce5067808 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7C/49/377C4944B1F65165B32CC53AE43EA2FB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ + + + +Revision of Phoenoteleia Kieffer (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae, Scelioninae) + + + +Author + +Lahey, Zachary +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9402-9570 +Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, USA +zachary.lahey@usda.gov + + + +Author + +Musetti, Luciana +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3904-2606 +Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, USA + + + +Author + +Masner, Lubomir +Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, USA + + + +Author + +Johnson, Norman F. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-5187 +Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, USA + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2021 + +2021-12-23 + + +87 + + +575 +611 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.87.59794 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.87.59794 +1314-2607-87-575 +F16C4490086F4D88A0BAFDF13E995C4D +7B773C3EC5F55F03B8A46B6611C88B0C +5811226 + + + + +Phoenoteleia Kieffer + + + + +Phoenoteleia +Kieffer, 1916: 62 (original description. Type: +Phoenoteleia rufa +Kieffer, by monotypy and original designation); Kieffer, 1926: 265, 550 (description, keyed); Dodd, 1929: 35 (description); Muesebeck and Walkley, 1956: 384 (citation of type species); Baltazar, 1966: 185 (cataloged, catalog of species of the Philippines); Masner, 1976: 31, 32 (description, key to males of +Anteromorpha +Dodd and +Phoenoteleia +Kieffer); Galloway and Austin, 1984: 7, 9, 20 (diagnosis, list of species described from Australia, keyed); Johnson, 1992: 460 (cataloged, catalog of world species); Austin and Field, 1997: 22, 68 (structure of ovipositor system, discussion of phylogenetic relationships). + + +Plagioscelio +Kieffer, 1916: 185 (original description. Type: +Plagioscelio rufescens +Kieffer, by original designation. Synonymized by +Masner (1976) +); Kieffer, 1926: 266, 356 (description, keyed, key to species); Muesebeck and Walkley, 1956: 384 (citation of type species); Baltazar, 1966: 176 (cataloged, catalog of species of the Philippines); Masner, 1976: 32 (junior synonym of +Phoenoteleia +Kieffer). + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Phoenoteleia + +can be distinguished from other scelionines by the following combination of characters: epitorular carinae present on frons; T1 of female always produced into an elongate horn which fits into a deep channel bisecting the metascutellum, mesoscutellum, and at least the posterior portion of the mesoscutum; venter of horn membranous; T1 with armilla; T2 clearly longer than T3; central portion of propodeum triangular, in same plane as mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, and metascutellum (male only); submarginal vein strongly curving towards costal margin of fore wing apically; marginal vein distinctly shorter than stigmal vein; postmarginal vein at least twice as long as stigmal vein; basitarsus on hind leg at least twice as long as combined length of remaining tarsomeres, distinctly incrassate in males. + + + +Description. +Length 2.21-3.95 mm; body elongate, gracile to robust. + +Head +. Head shape in dorsal view: transverse. Hyperoccipital carina: absent. Occipital carina: present, complete. Length of OOL: lateral ocellus <1 OD from inner margin of compound eye. Shape of upper frons: convex. Antennal scrobe: undifferentiated from surrounding surface sculpture. Submedian carina: absent. Orbital carina: absent. Course of inner orbits: diverging ventrally. IOS/EH: IOS shorter than EH. Central keel: absent. Antennal foramen: oriented laterally on interantennal process. Facial striae: present. Malar striae: present. Malar sulcus: present. Setation of compound eye: present, short. Gena: convex, distinctly produced behind compound eye. Shape of clypeus: convex, trapezoidal, lateral corners not produced. Ventral margin of clypeus: rounded. Anteclypeus: absent. Postclypeus: absent. Labrum: transverse, visible anteriorly. Number of mandibular teeth: 3. Arrangement of mandibular teeth: transverse. Number of maxillary palpomeres: 3. Shape of maxillary palpomeres: cylindrical. Number of labial palpomeres: 2. Sculpture of occiput: granulate. + + +Antenna +. Number of antennomeres in female: 12. Number of antennomeres in male: 12. Insertion of radicle into A1: parallel to longitudinal axis of A1. Shape of A1: more or less cylindrical, not flattened. Length of A3 of female: longer than A2, approximately as long or slightly longer than radicle. Claval formula: 1-2-2-2-1; 1-2-2-2-2; 1-2-2-2-2-1. Number of clavomeres: 5; 6. Arrangement of papillary sensilla: longitudinal. Antennomeres bearing tyloids in male antenna: A5. Shape of male flagellum: filiform. + + +Mesosoma +. Transverse pronotal carina: present. Posterior apex of pronotum in dorsal view: articulate with tegula. Epomial carina: present. Anterior face of pronotum: visible dorsally, short. Netrion: present. Shape of netrion: wide, closed dorsally, open ventrally. Netrion sulcus: present. Anterior portion of mesoscutum: vertical, flexed ventrally to meet pronotum. Shape of mesoscutum: pentagonal, excavate at base of wings. Skaphion: absent. Parapsidial lines: absent; present. Antero-admedian lines: absent. Transscutal articulation: developed, narrow. Shape of mesoscutellum: transverse, present lateral to horn of T1 in females, complete in males. Transaxillar carina: present. Axillular carina: present. Lateral mesoscutellar spine: absent. Median mesoscutellar spine: absent. Axillular spine: absent. Surface of mesoscutellum: in same plane as mesoscutum. Median longitudinal furrow on mesoscutellum: absent. Metascutellum: transverse, lateral to horn of T1 in females, complete in males. Setation of metascutellum: absent. Lateral propodeal projection: absent. Medial portion of metascutellum in males: plate-like triangular, elevated relative to lateral portions. Median propodeal projection: absent. Subacropleural sulcus: present, indicated by a dorsoventral line of setae. Mesopleural carina: present. Mesepimeral sulcus: present. Posterior mesepimeral area: present. Sculpture of posterior mesepimeral area: smooth. Mesal course of acetabular carina: not separating fore coxae. Mesopleural pit: present. Metapleural sulcus: present. Paracoxal sulcus: present. + + +Legs +. Number of mesotibial spurs: 1. Number of metatibial spurs: 1. Relative length of metabasitarsus: at least twice the length of remaining tarsomeres. Dorsal surface of metacoxa: smooth. Shape of metacoxa: cylindrical, ecarinate. Trochantellus: indicated by transverse sulcus on femur. + + +Wings +. Wing development of female: macropterous. Wing development of male: macropterous. Tubular veins in fore wing: present. Setation of R vein: present, sparse, long. Bulla of fore wing R vein: absent. Length of marginal vein of fore wing: at least 2 times shorter than stigmal vein. Origin of stigmal vein (r-rs) in fore wing: arising from marginal vein along costal margin. Development of R vein in hind wing: complete, reaching frenal hooks. + + +Metasoma +. Number of external metasomal tergites in female: 6. Number of external metasomal sternites in female: 6. Number of external metasomal tergites in male: 8. Number of external metasomal sternites in male: 7. Shape of metasoma: fusiform, narrowly constricted between T1 and T2 in females. Laterotergites: present. Laterosternites: present. T1 of female: produced into an elongate horn that bisects the metascutellum, mesoscutellum, and at least the posterior margin of the mesoscutum. Armilla: present. Relative size of metasomal terga: T2 longest (excluding horn of T1 in females), T3 longer than T4. Transverse sulcus on T2: present. Metasomal terga with basal crenulae: T2 in females, T1 and T2 in males. Sublateral carinae on metasomal terga: present. Median longitudinal carina on metasomal terga: absent. Shape of T6 in female: widest anteriorly. Anterior margin of S1: straight, not produced anteriorly. Felt fields on S2: present. Felt fields on S3: absent. Ovipositor: + +Scelio + +-type ( +Austin and Field 1997 +). + + + + +Generic transfer of + +Phoenoteleia fusca + +(Kieffer) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7C/6C/377C6C17B814CE6A4D95A0DAB687809A.xml b/data/37/7C/6C/377C6C17B814CE6A4D95A0DAB687809A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6bc6b8b6ba1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7C/6C/377C6C17B814CE6A4D95A0DAB687809A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ + + + +Updated list of the mosquitoes of Colombia (Diptera: Culicidae) + + + +Author + +Rozo-Lopez, Paula + + + +Author + +Mengual, Ximo + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +4567 +4567 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4567 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4567 +1314-2828--4567 + + + + +Culex (Melanoconion) vomerifer Komp, 1932 + + + +Notes + +Knight and Stone 1977 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7C/9C/377C9C4CC30D5C159E7A7EDB8675353B.xml b/data/37/7C/9C/377C9C4CC30D5C159E7A7EDB8675353B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2951069cd99 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7C/9C/377C9C4CC30D5C159E7A7EDB8675353B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ + + + +Ameisen des Herrn Prof. v. Ihering aus Brasilien (Sao Paulo usw.) nebst einigen anderen aus Südamerika und Afrika (Hym.). + + + +Author + +Forel, A. + +text + + +Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift + + +1911 + +1911 + + +285 +312 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/4029/4029.pdf + +journal article +4029 + + + + +Dorymyrmex tener Mayr. subsp. Richteri +n. sp. + + + + +L. 2,5-3,2 mm. Ganz schwarzbraun mit braunen Gliedern. Sehr kurz, aber am ganzen +Koerper +maessig +reichlich und an +Fuehlerschaft +und Schienen +spaerlicher +abstehend fein und spitz behaart. Skulptur und Pubescenz wie beim Arttypus; Kopf noch +schmaeler +. Epinotum mit einem sehr kleinen und stumpfen Kegel, kleiner als bei der +var. chilensis +, kaum +groesser +als beim Arttyp.us. Sonst genau wie der Arttypus, auch die Barthaare und die unten verdickte Schuppe. + + + +Buenos Aires (Richter). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7C/AA/377CAA3DC944319C756F52F8E1AEAD50.xml b/data/37/7C/AA/377CAA3DC944319C756F52F8E1AEAD50.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7b64d59f50 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7C/AA/377CAA3DC944319C756F52F8E1AEAD50.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Faunistic diversity of spiders (Araneae) in Galichitsa mountain (FYR Macedonia) + + + +Author + +Deltshev, Christo + + + +Author + +Komnenov, Marjan + + + +Author + +Blagoev, Gergin + + + +Author + +Georgiev, Teodor + + + +Author + +Lazarov, Stoyan + + + +Author + +Stojkoska, Emilija + + + +Author + +Naumova, Maria + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2013 + +1 + + +977 +977 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 +1314-2828--977 + + + + +peltata +Neriene +Araneae +Arachnida +Arthropoda +Animalia + + + + +Neriene peltata (Wider, 1854) + + + +Distribution +Palearctic. + + +Notes + +Previously recorded from unspecified locality between Resen and Ohrid ( +Drensky 1929 +, +Drensky 1936 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7D/4A/377D4AAFA43780FB3B6241A13732130E.xml b/data/37/7D/4A/377D4AAFA43780FB3B6241A13732130E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b952e6bae7a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7D/4A/377D4AAFA43780FB3B6241A13732130E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - aculeates (Apoidea, Chrysidoidea and Vespoidea) + + + +Author + +Else, George R. + + + +Author + +Bolton, Barry + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8050 +8050 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8050 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8050 +1314-2828--8050 + + + + +Nomada signata Jurine, 1807 + + + +Distribution +England, Wales + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7D/87/377D87D7F32BFFAEFCFBF88AFECD4AF9.xml b/data/37/7D/87/377D87D7F32BFFAEFCFBF88AFECD4AF9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..96fc95c79c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7D/87/377D87D7F32BFFAEFCFBF88AFECD4AF9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@ + + + +Genetic and phytochemical investigations for understanding population variability of the medicinally important tree Saraca asoca to help develop conservation strategies + + + +Author + +Hegde, Satisha +∗ & ICMR - National Institute of Traditional Medicine, Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, Government of India, Belagavi, Karnataka, & KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (Deemed-to-be-University), Dr. Prabhakar Kore Basic Science Research Center, Belagavi, Karnataka, 590010, India + + + +Author + +Pai, Sandeep Ramchandra + + + +Author + +Bhagwat, Rasika M. + + + +Author + +Saini, Archana + + + +Author + +Rathore, Poonam Kanwar + + + +Author + +Jalalpure, Sunil Satyappa + + + +Author + +Hegde, Harsha Vasudev + + + +Author + +Sugunan, Attayoor Purushottaman + + + +Author + +Gupta, Vidya S. + + + +Author + +Kholkute, Sanjiva D. + + + +Author + +Roy, Subarna + +text + + +Phytochemistry + + +2018 + +2018-09-04 + + +156 + + +43 +54 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.08.016 + +journal article +10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.08.016 +1873-3700 +10484704 + + + + + + +2.5. Relationship between phytochemical and molecular analysis of +S. asoca + + + + + + +How biodiversity changes over evolutionary time, is an interesting fundamental aspect which depicts modes of species diversification ( +Lewitus and Morlon, 2016 +). However, natural selection maintains existing function and drives adaptation, which leads to altering patterns of diversity at the genetic level ( +Good et al., 2014 +). In the present study, genotypes showed two major clusters including several sub-groups, while diverse variations were observed in specialized metabolites tested in the + +S. asoca + +populations. However, excluding minor deviations, UPGMA and Bayesian Models (STRUCTURE) showed close association of genotypes according to their different geographical areas of collection. Overall, the cluster grouping of chromatograms of phytochemical constituents analysed from leaf and corresponding bark samples of 106 accessions of + +S. asoca + +collected from 11 populations were not complete match. Similarly, cluster grouping of chemotypes of both leaf and bark failed to match with those obtained with their genotypes. Although, multiple logistic regression analysis predicted some association between few loci with GA, EPI and CAT (Suppl. +Table 5 +), PCA for phytochemical data failed to distinguish the populations (Suppl. Fig. 6a) and no distinct complete linkages could be drawn using it. Therefore, no direct congruence in relationship of phytochemical and molecular markers could be established. Nonetheless, it should be considered that, for phytochemical analysis, only three standards were studied and 74 loci were worked for genetic analysis. + + + +Fig. 4. +(a): Dendrogram generated for 106 bark samples from 11 + +S. asoca + +populations using area obtained from HPLC (GA: gallic acid, CA: catechin and EPI: epicatechin). (b): Dendrogram generated for 106 leaf samples from 11 + +S. asoca + +populations using area obtained from HPLC run (GA: gallic acid, CA: catechin and EPI: epicatechin). + + + + +Table 4 +Summary of cut off values of leaf, bark and both parts of +S. asoca +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Sl. NoParameterBest Cut-At Best Cut-offRMS (FP,
OffFN)
SensitivitySpecificity
1GA-both leaf and0.050039.1577.8064.80
bark
2GA-BARK0.05007.5077.8095.10
3GA-LEAF0.050070.8077.8036.70
4EPI- both leaf and0.025094.8088.9012.30
bark
5EPI-BARK0.025099.1088.9011.20
6EPI-LEAF0.025090.6088.9014.60
7CAT- both leaf and0.050037.7077.8066.10
bark
8CAT-BARK0.050050.9077.8053.90
9CAT-LEAF0.050080.2033.3069.50
+ + +RMS: Root Mean Square error; FP: False Positives; FN: False Negatives; GA: gallic acid; EPI: epicatechin; CAT: catechin. + + +Natural selection and its expression depend on various factors including environmental condition. It is well known that genetic factors, coupled with various epigenetic factors and seasonal variations, play a role in production of specialized metabolites. While it is appreciated that the use of ISSR markers alone may not be able to capture all the genetic characteristics, the tool is considered adequate to provide information on the basic differences in genotypes particularly from the evolutionary genetic viewpoint as is done in this study. Both biotic and abiotic stresses play critical role in specialized metabolites production where in + +S. asoca + +the environmental changes also might be a major reason for observed variations in genetic and phytochemical profiles. However, the present investigation is expected to provide the baseline data for conservation practices and for selection of varieties for propagation and it should facilitate our broader understanding of the genetic and phytochemical diversities in + +S. asoca + +. The results will therefore be beneficial to develop conservation strategies and for quality control studies in + +S. asoca + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7D/B6/377DB69ED2E6741E3795D77C29EC543F.xml b/data/37/7D/B6/377DB69ED2E6741E3795D77C29EC543F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..940c5190af1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7D/B6/377DB69ED2E6741E3795D77C29EC543F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the pelidnotine scarabs (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae, Rutelini) and annotated catalog of the species and subspecies + + + +Author + +Moore, Matthew R. +Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida Building 1881 Natural Drive Area, Steinmetz Hall, Box 110620, Gainesville, FL 32611 - 0620, USA + + + +Author + +Jameson, Mary L. +Department of Biological Sciences, Wichita State University 1845 Fairmount, Box 26, Wichita, KS 67260 - 0026, USA +maryliz.jameson@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Garner, Beulah H. +Natural History Museum, Insects Division, Department of Life Sciences, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, UK + + + +Author + +Audibert, Cedric +Musee des Confluences, Centre de Conservation et d'Etude des Collections, 13 A Rue Bancel, F- 69007 Lyon, France + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. +Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P. O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, K 1 P 6 P 4, Canada + + + +Author + +Seidel, Matthias + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +2017-04-06 + + +666 + + +1 +349 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.666.9191 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.666.9191 +1313-2970-666-1 +B3C377E8BBB14F328AECA2C22D1E625A +C43EEB41A94B930FFE439D1FAD29FF9C +579453 + + + + +Chrysina guaymi (Curoe, 2001) + + + + +Plusiotis guaymi +Curoe, 2001: 46-49 [original combination]. + + +Chrysina guaymi +(Curoe) [ +comb. n. +]. + + + +Distribution. + +PANAMA: +Chiriqui +( +Curoe 2001 +; Thomas et al. 2009). + + + +Types. + +1 ♂ holotype and 1 ♀ allotype at MIUP ( +Curoe 2001 +); paratypes at STRI, MNCR, and MXAL ( +Curoe 2001 +). + + + +Remarks. + +The genus + +Plusiotis + +was synonymized with + +Chrysina + +in 2001 ( +Hawks 2001 +), the same year that Curoe described a new species from Panama ( +Curoe 2001 +). In + +Hawks' +(2006) + +online "Checklist of + +Chrysina + +species", + +Plusiotis guaymi + +Curoe is listed as the new combination + +Chrysina guaymi + +. Because the online checklist is not considered to be formally published for nomenclatural purposes, we formalize this +new combination +herein. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7D/BA/377DBA2482170705C85EEF2A05B00211.xml b/data/37/7D/BA/377DBA2482170705C85EEF2A05B00211.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..31e8ccfa36e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7D/BA/377DBA2482170705C85EEF2A05B00211.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Subfamily +Ptilodactylinae Laporte, 1836 + + + + +Ptilodactylidae +Laporte, 1836: 21 [stem: Ptilodactyl-]. Type genus: +Ptilodactyla +Illiger, 1807. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7D/C5/377DC55360F818C6A3C880E3FFD68554.xml b/data/37/7D/C5/377DC55360F818C6A3C880E3FFD68554.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..65465f08c77 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7D/C5/377DC55360F818C6A3C880E3FFD68554.xml @@ -0,0 +1,325 @@ + + + +An updated checklist of aquatic plants of Myanmar and Thailand + + + +Author + +Ito, Yu + + + +Author + +Barfod, Anders S. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1019 +1019 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1019 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1019 +1314-2828-2-1019 + + + + +Hydrilla verticillata (L. f.) Royle, 1839 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Myanmar +; stateProvince: Kachin; verbatimLocality: Tanaing Township; verbatimLatitude: +26° 22' 22'' N +; verbatimLongitude: +96° 43' E +; Event: eventDate: +Sep. 15, 2005 +; Record Level: collectionID: MBK040056; institutionCode: +TI + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Myanmar +; stateProvince: Shan State; locality: +Pindaya +; verbatimLatitude: +20° 59' 57" N +; verbatimLongitude: +96° 39' 59" E +; Record Level: collectionID: MBK080634; institutionCode: +TI + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Myanmar +; locality: +Mandalay Division +; verbatimLatitude: +22° 00' 29'' N +; verbatimLongitude: +96° 28' 06'' E +; Event: eventDate: +Jan. 11, 2002 +; Record Level: collectionID: Tanaka et al. 021712; institutionCode: +TI + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Myanmar +; locality: +Mandalay Division +; verbatimLatitude: +20° 48' N +; verbatimLongitude: +95° 15' E +; Event: eventDate: +Mar. 4, 2003 +; Record Level: collectionID: Tanaka et al. 028704; institutionCode: +TI + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Myanmar +; locality: +Bago Division +; verbatimLatitude: +18° 42' 22'' N +; verbatimLongitude: +95° 5' 59'' E +; Event: eventDate: +Dec. 9, 2006 +; Record Level: collectionID: Sugawara et al. 036433; institutionCode: +TI + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Myanmar +; locality: +Kachin State +; verbatimLatitude: +26° 6' 34'' N +; verbatimLongitude: +96° 42' 58'' E +; Event: eventDate: +Sep. 19, 2005 +; Record Level: collectionID: Tanaka et al. 040483; institutionCode: +TI + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Myanmar +; locality: +Shan State +; verbatimLatitude: +20° 35' 41'' N +; verbatimLongitude: +96° 31' 46'' E +; Event: eventDate: +Nov. 26, 2008 +; Record Level: collectionID: Tanaka et al. 080050; institutionCode: +TI + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Myanmar +; locality: +Shan State +; verbatimLatitude: +20° 35' 41'' N +; verbatimLongitude: +96° 31' 46'' E +; Event: eventDate: +Nov. 26, 2008 +; Record Level: collectionID: Tanaka et al. 080057; institutionCode: +TI + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Myanmar +; locality: +Shan State +; verbatimLatitude: +20° 27' 28'' N +; verbatimLongitude: +96° 50' 37'' E +; Event: eventDate: +Dec. 4, 2008 +; Record Level: collectionID: Tanaka et al. 080663; institutionCode: +TI + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Myanmar +; locality: +Taunngyi +; verbatimLatitude: +20° 47' 14" N +; verbatimLongitude: +97° 2' 7" E +; Event: eventDate: +Jan. 5, 1938 +; Record Level: collectionID: F.G. Dickason 9334; institutionCode: +GH + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Thailand +; locality: +Chiang Mai Province; Chiang Dao District +; verbatimLatitude: +19° 28' 46" N +; verbatimLongitude: +98° 54' 44" E +; Event: eventDate: +Dec. 11, 1992 +; Record Level: collectionID: V.A. Sunthorn, P. Palee 101; institutionCode: +GH + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Thailand +; verbatimLatitude: +13° 45' 10" N +; verbatimLongitude: +100° 29' 45" E +; Record Level: collectionID: T- 50413 [TI]; institutionCode: +TI + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Thailand +; locality: +Pha Team National Park, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand +; verbatimLatitude: +15° 24' 07'' N +; verbatimLongitude: +105° 29' 20'' E +; Record Level: collectionID: Tr. Tanaka; institutionCode: +TNS + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Y. Ito +; Location: country: +Thailand +; locality: +Hotel river Kwai, Kantchanabury +; verbatimLatitude: +14° 1' 59" N +; verbatimLongitude: +99° 31' 10" E +; Event: eventDate: +Nov. 15, 2012 +; Record Level: collectionID: Y. Ito 1724; institutionCode: +BKF + + + + +Distribution +Bangladesh, Bhutan, China (nationwide), Indonesia (nationwide), Japan, Malaysia (nationwide), Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Thailand, Sri Lanka. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7E/24/377E24F94582420E4D5BDFBCEFF47258.xml b/data/37/7E/24/377E24F94582420E4D5BDFBCEFF47258.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4e3d3283d06 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7E/24/377E24F94582420E4D5BDFBCEFF47258.xml @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ + + + +Études myrmécologiques en 1886. + + + +Author + +Forel, A. + +text + + +Annales de la Societe Entomologique de Belgique + + +1886 + +30 + + +131 +215 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/3923/3923.pdf + +journal article +3923 +33E1E81D-6489-4D52-828D-DCA172BC7D97 + + + + +Esp. C. +egregius Smith + + += +prismaticus Mayr +(d'apres Roger) var.? + + + + +Dans mes Etudes myrmecologiques en 1879 j'ai fait erreur en reunissant cette espece comme race au +C. compressus +. J'avais eu sous les yeux un +C. compressus +du musee de Munich qui etait evidemment muni d'une fausse etiquette et ne provenait pas du Bresil. J'ai recu des lors le vrai +egregius +du Bresil par l'obligeance du Dr John Sahlberg, a Helsingfors. Les deux [[ worker ]] major que j'ai recues mesurent 16 a 17 millimetres. Leur sculpture rappelle celle du +C. compressus +, ainsi que leur couleur d'un noir mat. Elles sont. cependant fort differentes de cette race du +C. rubripes +et ont plutot la forme du +C. sylvaticus +. Comme Mayr a recu cette espece de Borneo et que j'en ai decrit ailleurs une race ou variete provenant de Madagascar ( +C. Gouldi +, Bull. Soc ent. Belg., mai 1886), nous avons affaire a une forme de grande extension geographique, quoique rare. C'est un des geants du groupe +rubripes +auquel elle se rattache intimement. Voici les caracteres qui distinguent l´ +egregius +du +compressus +, caracteres dont les descriptions ont a peine tenu compte: + + +Le +C. egregius +est beaucoup plus elance que le +C. compressus +et a les pattes et les antennes beaucoup plus longues et beaucoup plus robustes: les cuisses des pattes posterieures de la [[ worker ]] major sont longues de 7 mill, chez l´ +egregius +, de 4 mill, chez le +compressus +, tandis que la longueur du corps ne differe guere que d'un millimetre. Les scapes des antennes depassent le bord posterieur de la tete de la moitie de leur longueur chez l' +egregius +i. sp., et ne le depassent pas ou a peine chez le +compressus +. La tete du +compressus +([[ worker ]] maxima) est extremement large, courte, fortement voutee en dessus, a bords tres convexes, largement mais faiblement echancree derriere. Celle de l´ +egregius +est plus allongee meme que celle du +sylvaticus +a laquelle elle ressemble, fortement, echancree derriere, a bords presque droits et a peine divergents. Enfin le +compressus +a une ecaille de forme ordinaire, tandis que l'ecaille de l´ +egregius +i. sp. est extremement epaissie a sa base; vue de cote elle forme un cone dont la base est presque aussi epaisse que la hauteur. Les poils de l´ +egregius +sont brunatres, mais ne sont pas noirs comme le pretend Smith. + + + + +Il est possible que la +Formica agra Smith +soit la [[ worker ]] minor du +C. egregius +. + + +La race Gouldi Forel, [[ worker ]] major, se distingue encore de l´ +egregius +i. sp. par les caracteres-suivants. L'ecaille a une hauteur double de l'epaisseur de sa base (chez l´ +egregius +i. sp. elle est aussi. epaisse que haute). Le thorax est assez fortement voute devant, surtout sur le devant du mesonotum, presque droit du milieu du mesonotum a l'extremite de la face basale du metanotum; cette derniere n'est longue qu'une fois et demie comme la face declive (chez l´ +egregius +i. sp. le thorax est egalement voute d'un bout a l'autre, et la face basale est deux fois longue comme la face declive). he +C. Gouldi +a la tete plus elargie et plus excavee derriere, la taille un peu plus robuste, les pattes et les antennes moins longues. Longueur des scapes 4,5 chez +Gouldi +, 6,0 chez +egregius +; des tibias posterieurs, 5,8 chez +Gouldi +, 6,8 chez +egregius +. Longueur de la tete (au milieu, sans les mandibules) 5,1 mill.; largeur maximale 4,7 mill., chez le +C. Gouldi +; longueur de la tete 5,1 mill., largeur 4,45 chez le +C. egregius +. La face declive du metanotum est plus basse chez l´ +egregius +, ainsi que tout le thorax. Les eperons posterieurs sont distinctement pectines chez l´ +egregius +, indistinctement chez le +Gouldi +; les piquants des tibias sont par contre plus abondants chez ce dernier. Le bord externe des mandibules est plus convexe chez le +Gouldi +que chez l´ +egregius +. Le lobe de l'epistome est aussi rectangulaire et aussi excave sur ses cotes chez la [[ worker ]] minor du C. Gouldi que chez la [[ worker ]] major et que chez l´ +egregius +. + + +Je sonpconne que le +C. prismaticus Mayr +, de Borneo est une race qui differe sous certains rapports de l´ +egregius +du Bresil quoique Roger (Verzeichniss) l'ait declare identique. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7E/87/377E87DB9753592DFF2BFF553948B481.xml b/data/37/7E/87/377E87DB9753592DFF2BFF553948B481.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0c5cd33e8df --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7E/87/377E87DB9753592DFF2BFF553948B481.xml @@ -0,0 +1,678 @@ + + + +A review of the monophyly and composition of the Bengaliinae with the description of a new genus and species, and new evidence for the presence of Melanomyinae in the Afrotropical Region (Diptera, Calliphoridae) 2964 + + + +Author + +Rognes, Knut + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2011-07-13 + + +2964 + + +1 + + +1 +60 + + + + +https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.2964.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.2964.1.1 +1175­5334 +5281596 + + + + + + + +Mafikengia ciliata + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +Figs. 1–37 +. + + + +Holotype +male, +Mafikeng +, +North West Province +, +South Africa +( +ZMUC +), here designated. For details, see Type material below. + + + + + + +Etymology +. + +The specific epithet + +ciliata + +is a latinised adjective, gender feminine, in the nominative singular. It is derived from +cilium +(Latin, meaning eyelid, carrying eyelashes) and is referring to the fine setulae (cilia) along the vein R +4+5 +on both surfaces of the wing extending all the way to the costal margin, as well as to the very long dorsal preapical setae on the hind tibia. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Mafikengia ciliata + +is recognisable on the following combination of characters which is unique among oestroid flies: Ground colour yellow, except much of thoracic dorsum, all of the mediotergite, anatergite, katatergite and meron, and narrow hind bands on the abdominal tergites which are blackish. Eye very small. Frons at narrowest point 0.53x head width. Fronto-orbital plate with two lateroclinate orbital setae. Genal dilation 0.9x eye height. Palpus dorsoventrally flattened and projecting far beyond lower facial margin. Hind tibia with a very long dorsal preapical seta, longer than first tarsomere. Vein R +4+5 +ciliate on both surfaces of the wing all the way to the wing margin. Anal vein reaching the wing margin. Vein M gently curved at bend. Cell r +4+5 +opening at the wing tip. Cerci fused in the midline, except for a narrow slit at the tip. Surstylus undivided, posterior part flat, broad and bare, separated from the epandrium by unsclerotised membrane. Distiphallus with a narrow ring-like ventral plate, a distinct rather broad mesohypophallic sclerotisation proceeding distally from its ventralmost point narrowing to a ridge below the ejaculatory opening and for much of its course situated in a deep groove in the ventral surface of the distiphallus. Lateral wall of distiphallus strongly sclerotised and almost a circular structure with serrated margin distally and ventrally. A short, strongly serrated hypophallic lobe on each side. The hypophallic lobes and the ventral part of the sclerotised lateral wall of the distiphallus form two dentate ridges ventrally on each side converging towards the midline in ventral view. + + + + +Description. + + +Male +. Body length: +4 mm +. +Ground colour. +Yellow, sometimes with various shades of light brown or reddish yellow, with the following major exceptions. The basal thickening of the arista yellow, but the distal 5/6 of the stalk and all the aristal hairs black. Head black at the upper third or half of the occiput, except for a yellow semicircular area in the middle of the upper occiput; this area being a backward continuation of the yellow frontal vitta ( +Figs. 2, 3 +). Ocellar triangle black. The black area of the occiput reaching forward to the hind edge of the eye and to the hindmost part of the fronto-orbital plates, enclosing the outer vertical seta and reaching forward to the hindmost lateroclinate orbital seta. The latter seta and the inner vertical seta both standing on the border between the yellow and black area. Scutum black, except for the following sclerites which are yellow ( +Fig. 7 +): the postpronotal lobe (“humeral callus”) and the area immediately behind it; the notopleuron; the narrow lateral area above the wing carrying the supra-alar setae; the postalar callus and the scutellum. In addition a small wedge-shaped yellow area on each side of the suture. The anterior two-thirds of the postalar wall dark. The mediotergite, anatergite, katatergite and meron black or very dark. The abdominal segments T1+2, T3, T4 and T5 with very narrow brownish black posterior bands; on T3 and T4 with triangular forward brownish projections, reaching at most the middle of each tergite; on T5 the posterior band interrupted in the middle ( +Figs. 15, 16 +). + + +Pollinosity. +Most of the body covered with a very thin layer of white pollinosity. Parafacial waxy and almost without pollinosity. The abdominal segments also almost without pollinosity except for very narrow areas laterally on the extreme anterior parts of T3–5, visible in a very low angle of view. + + + +Setae +. + +Black, except when noted otherwise. + + +Head +( +Figs. 1–6 +). Rather globose, with small eyes. Frons width at vertex / head width ratio 0.53. Frontal vitta reddish yellow, contrasting slightly with yellow fronto-orbital plates, narrowing slightly towards lunula, bare, at level of anterior ocellus twice as wide as fronto-orbital plate. 4 frontal seta on right side, 6 on left (2 of the latter weak). 2 strong lateroclinate orbital setae on each side, anteriormost seta at level with posteriormost frontal seta. Outer and inner verticals strong. Ocellar setae strong. Lunula bare. Fronto-orbital plate with scattered setulae continuing down for the whole length of the parafacial, and also invading the area below the eye. Parafacial broad, in broadest aspect 0.6x width of fore femur. Vibrissal corner slightly projecting, but situated well in front of lower facial margin, which is not projecting. Vibrissa large, distance between vibrissae greater than length of first flagellomere. Face broad, hollow, and without a keel. Facial ridge with 5 small supravibrissal setulae ascending almost halfway to lunula. Buccal cavity wider than long. 2 subvibrissal setulae and 3 setulae along sides of buccal cavity. Genal height 0.9x height of eye in lateral view. Genal dilation short and high, clothed with scattered setulae. Area between posterior eye margin and postocular row of setae bare. The single postocular row of setae proceeding medially behind the outer and inner verticals as several rows of small setulae to a level slightly medial to the inner vertical, very few setulae invading the yellow occipital area. Occiput convex with black setulae all over, some pale ones below in middle. + + + +FIGURES 2–6 +. + +Mafikengia ciliata + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype, head. +2 +. Dorsal view. +3 +. Detail of upper occipital region, posterodorsal view. +4 +. Right lateral view. +5 +. Detail of left parafacial. +6 +. Anterior view. + + + +Scape with a few very short setulae, scapes touching in midline. Pedicel with a long seta and scattered small setulae. First flagellomere (“third antennal segment” = postpedicel) 3x as long as wide, lower end separated from lower facial margin by twice the width of the basal part of the arista. Arista very long, almost 2x length of first flagellomere ( +Figs. 2, 4 +), moderately long plumose almost to the tip; its basal 1/6 conspicuously thickened. + +Palpus white, long, broad distally, longer than antenna, strongly flattened dorsoventrally and projecting far beyond lower facial margin. On upper side with numerous short setae all over, longer setae along margin. On underside palpus almost bare. +Prementum long and broad, boat-shaped, labellum half as long. + + +FIGURES 7–12 +. + +Mafikengia ciliata + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype, thorax. +7. +Scutum, dorsal view. +8. +Anterior spiracle and proepisternal depression, right lateral view. +9. +Posterior spiracle and parts of meron, right lateral view. +10. +Mediotergite, anatergite and lower calypter, posterior view. Arrow points to pale and black setulae on anatergite below lower calypter. +11. +Lateral scutellar declivity, right lateral view. Arrow points to regular row of setulae. +12. +Postalar wall, right lateral view. Arrow points to group of minute black setulae. + + + + +Thorax +( +Figs. 7–12 +). + +Scutum with sparse microtomentum behind suture. In front of suture more conspicuous white microtomentum, reaching suture in medial part, but widely separated from suture laterally. A dark vitta in midline from the presutural +acr +to the suture, which can be followed in some lights also on the postsutural part of scutum; another much longer vitta between +acr +and +dc +rows. Ground setulae sparse. + + +Postpronotal lobe (“humeral callus”) with 2 strong +h +on the lateral part, the outermost seta the strongest one; with short stubby setae medial to and between the +h +, and on the anterior and lateral slopes. No setulae on the surface directly behind the +h +. Notopleuron, apart from 2 +npl +, bare (right side) or with 1–2 minute ground setulae (left side). Anterior +npl +1.5x as long as posterior +npl +. 1 + 3 +acr +, equally strong, the first pair well in front of suture. 2 + 3 +dc +, becoming slightly stronger posteriorly. Rows of +acr +slightly closer to each other than to the row of +dc +. 1 +ph +only present (the inner). +prst +strong. No further setae in the area between the inner +ph +and the +prst +. 0 + 2 +ia +. 3 +sa +: the first ( +pra +) weak, shorter than posterior +npl +and a little longer than ground setulae, the second strong and long, the third weak; all on one line; no distinct Hough seta (discussed below) to the inside of the area between the first and second postsutural +sa +( +Rognes 1997: 52 +, fig. 11), although a few setulae are present closer to the suture. 2 +pa +(both strong and long). Scutellum with two equally strong marginal +scut +, of which the apical reaches a little farther back than the basal, and a discal pair of weaker setae. A regular row of small setulae following lower edge of the lateral scutellar declivity forwards ( +Fig. 11 +, arrow). No setulae on the underside of the scutellum. Postalar wall with 2–3 minute setulae on right side ( +Fig. 12 +, arrow), the left side could not be examined. Lateral surface of thorax with thin layer of white microtomentum on all sclerites. One strong and upturned proepisternal and one proepimeral seta present, each accompanied by a much smaller supplemental seta just below each of them curving in the same direction. Proepisternal depression bare ( +Fig. 8 +). Anterior (prothoracic) spiracle small and white. The suture running from fore coxa to the lower end of prothoracic spiracle is a conspicuous brown and shining line ( +Fig. 8 +). Anepisternum ( +Fig. 1 +) with 3 marginal setae in upper half, the second from top the largest and of about the same size as the fore +npl +, and one strong marginal seta in lowermost half. Area between the 3 upper and the single lower seta with an irregular group of 3–5 small thin marginal setae. A few setulae in front of marginal row. Upper anterior part of anepisternum with a group of black setulae (covered with white residues from stay in ethanol). Anepimeron bare in anterior half; posterior half below lesser ampulla with a bundle of 4–5 short black setulae, no strong seta among them; behind and below this bundle with some thin pale setulae. Mediotergite bare. No swollen or protruding subscutellum, just a narrow flat sclerotisation below a broader unsclerotised membrane and above the mediotergite ( +Figs. 10, 12 +). Anatergite with a few small black and pale setulae below underside of base of lower calypter ( +Fig. 10 +, arrow). Katatergite (supraspiracular convexity) bare. Katepisternum with a few long black setulae in upper part and 1+1 +kepst +. Anterior +kepst +weak, posterior strong. Lower part with rows of long strong setae in front of mid coxa. Meron with a row of 4–5 strong black meral setae ( +Fig. 9 +). Katepimeron bare with white microtomentum. Coxopleural streak absent. Metathoracic spiracle twice as long as broad, lappets white, and posterior lappet much smaller than anterior one ( +Fig. 9 +). Metakatepisternum (area above hind coxa) bare. Metasternal area (in front of hind coxae) bare. Prosternum bare. + + + +FIGURES 13–16 +. + +Mafikengia ciliata + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype, wing and abdomen. +13 +. Right wing from above. +14 +. Detail of right wing, from below. Arrow points to exit of anal vein near fold in wing. +15 +. Abdomen, dorsal view. +16 +. Abdomen, ventrolateral view. + + + +Wing +( +Figs. 1 +, +13, 14 +). + +Membrane +glassy and covered with microtrichiae all over. +Costa +pale yellow, most other veins yellow basally, more brownish distally. +Basicosta +yellow, tegula yellow. +Anterior +edge of costa with two regular (anterodorsal and anteroventral) rows of almost erect strong setulae longer than costal diameter. +These +are alternating for a long distance beyond exit of vein + +R +1 + +with 2–3 thin and much less erect setulae. +The +remainder of the anterior edge of costa only with thin setulae of the latter +type +. Costal spine prominent, 2x length of erect setulae. Upper and lower side of costa with small setulae for a long distance beyond exit of vein + +R +1 + +. Stem-vein bare on both surfaces of wing. Node at base of humeral crossvein bare + +. + + +Subcostal sclerite yellow, bare, no setulae or setae, only pale microtomentum present. Subcosta slightly sinuous with an inconspicuous forward bend at middle. Vein R +1 +brownish with a pale spot at middle. Vein R +4+5 +with thin rather long setulae on both surfaces of wing all the way to costa. Bend of vein M a gentle curve. Distal section of vein M (posterior crossvein) slightly sinuous distally so that the section closest to costa is running almost parallel to vein R +4+5 +. Cell r +4+5 +opens close to wing tip, opening as wide as length of +r-m +crossvein. +dm-cu +crossvein slightly sinuous, a little closer to bend of vein M than to +r-m +crossvein. Anal vein reaching margin ( +Fig. 14 +, arrow). Upper calypter small, brownish yellow. Lower calypter brownish yellow, much larger and longer than upper calypter, about as broad as long, inner edge converging with longitudinal axis of body; bare on both surfaces [many mites covering much of the upper surface making much of it invisible]. Halter with pale yellow stem and knob. + + +Legs +( +Figs. 17–22 +). All yellow, with black setae. Hind coxa bare on posterior surface. All femora thickened. No +pv +ctenidium on mid femur, setae in this position long and thin and widely spaced. Tibial setae moderately long. Tarsi much longer than tibiae. Claws and pulvilli on each tarsus about half as long as the distal tarsomere. Fore femur with complete row of +pv +setae; double row of +ad +setae in distal half. Fore tibia with 2 small +ad +, about as long as tibial diameter, and 1 +pv +twice as long; preapical +ad +, +d +(latter 1.5x length of former), +pv +and +v +setae (both about the size of the +ad +preapical) present. Mid femur with one +ad +at middle; a complete +av +row with distal 4–5 setae stronger than the rest; one +a +preapical seta; complete +pv +rows of setae shorter than femoral diameter; 2–3 +p +preapicals. Mid tibia with 2 +ad +[can also be described as 1 +a +and 1 +ad +], 2 +pd +and 1 +v +seta, all longer than tibial diameter. Hind femur with complete rows of +ad +setae, partly doubled in middle; 5–6 strong +av +setae in distal half, +av +in proximal half weak; complete rows of +pv +setae, those in proximal two-thirds stronger than the rest; one weak +pd +seta in preapical position. Hind tibia with 2 strong +ad +setae; strong +ad +, +d +and +pd +preapical setae, the +d +preapical remarkably long, 1.2x as long as first tarsomere ( +Figs. 1 +, +21, 22 +); 2 weak +a +preapicals and 1 +av +preapical as strong as the +ad +preapical. A thin and short +p +preapical close to and just below the +pd +preapical, and also a short and weak +pv +preapical. + + + +FIGURES 17–22 +. + +Mafikengia ciliata + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype, legs. +17 +. Left fore leg, posterior view. +18 +. Right fore leg, posterior view. +19 +. Right mid leg, anterior view. +20 +. Right mid leg, posterodorsal view. +21 +. Right hind leg, anterior view. +22 +. Right hind leg, dorsal view. + + + + +Abdomen +( +Figs. 15, 16 +). + +Excavation at base of T1+2 very shallow, hardly present at all. Ground setulae quite long and more or less erect. Complete marginal rows of setae on all tergites, weak on T1+2, becoming stronger posteriorly, strongest on T5. Irregular transverse rows of weaker discal setae on T3–T5. T6 a small bare sclerite in front of TST7+8, the latter setose. ST1–3 cannot be described since mostly hidden by phoretic mites, but visible posterior half of ST3 with black short setae. ST4 lost. ST5 of usual shape with lateral lobes, without alpha-setae near anterior margin. + + + +Genitalia +( +Figs. 23–37 +). + +Cerci and surstyli. Cerci fused into a single structure ( +Fig. 24 +). Proximal half narrowly oval with long upright setae. Distal half very narrow in dorsal view, also with long setae, at least basally. Distal half split for distal two-thirds into two very narrow pointed parts which do not diverge from each other. In lateral view distal half of cerci slightly curved downwards ( +Fig. 23 +). Each surstylus composed of two, broadly connected parts. A narrow distal part, situated on a level lower than the proximal part, is curved upwards towards the cerci in lateral view ( +Fig. 23 +), and curved slightly inwards in dorsal (posterior) view ( +Fig. 24 +). It has moderately long setae on distal two-thirds. The proximal part of the surstylus ( +p.sur +.) is a broad microtrichiose convex plate without setae, situated between the basal parts of the cerci and the epandrium ( +Fig. 24 +). It is separated from both sclerites by unsclerotised membrane. There is a downward slope +laterodistally +that connects it with the distal part, thus placing the distal half at a lower level than the cerci. There is a similar, but narrower, downward slope +mediodistally, +i.e., close to the cerci, that connects it with the upper end of the bacilliform sclerite. The bacilliform sclerites proceed downwards, as two simple separate rods, towards the posterior end of the hypandrial arms ( + +Figs. 23, +x +; 25 + +, +b.scl. +). The connection between the upper end of each bacilliform sclerite is thus on the medial side of the surstylus. + + + +FIGURES 23–25 +. + +Mafikengia ciliata + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype, cerci, surstyli, epandrium and bacilliform sclerites. +23 +. Cerci, surstylus, epandrium, left lateral view. The letter ‘ +x +’ marks the position of the remainder of the bacilliform sclerite, most of it removed from figure. +24 +. Cerci and surstylus, dorsal (posterior) view. +25 +. Genital capsule, internal view. + + + +Aedeagus. ( +Figs. 25–33 +). Basiphallus difficult to describe since partly hidden. Epiphallus ( +Fig. 25 +) elongate and curved, with a keel on anterior side. Distiphallus globose. Ventral plate narrow, ring-like. Mesohypophallic sclerotisation ( +Figs. 26, 27 +, +33 +) rather broad, proceeding distally from the ventralmost point of the ventral plate, narrowing to a ridge below the ejaculatory opening and for much of its course situated in a deep groove in the ventral surface of the distiphallus ( +Fig. 32 +). Lateral wall of distiphallus (“paraphallus”) strongly sclerotised (except along its margins) and, in lateral view, an almost circular structure with a weakly serrated margin distally and a strongly dentate margin ventrally, the latter termed an external hypophallic lobe ( +Figs. 30–32 +, +e +.). In ventral view a conspicuous inward bulge present in the ventral part ( +Figs. 30, 31 +). Each “paraphallus” diverging strongly from its counterpart on the opposite side in dorsal view ( +Figs. 28, 29 +). Middorsally between the anterodorsal edges of the lateral sclerotised wall of the distiphallus, and at a slightly lower level, a broad, curved (in lateral view) shield-like hood ( +Figs. 28, 29, 31 +), probably representing much of the dorsal sclerotised wall of the distiphallus. Below it the large opening of the ejaculatory duct ( +Fig. 29 +, +ej.o. +). Between the latter and the underside of the hood a strongly sclerotised median bridge connecting the two structures ( +Figs. 28, 29 +). Between the external hypophallic lobes a short, strongly serrated internal hypophallic lobe on each side ( +Figs. 30, 31 +, +i. +). The external and internal hypophallic lobes forming two dentate ridges ventrally on each side, at least the inner lobes converging towards midline in ventral view. + + +Pre- and postgonites. Postgonite a thickened elongate sclerite, curved at tip and with an apodeme at the proximal end articulating with the basiphallus. Postgonite lying alongside the epiphallus of the basiphallus ( +Fig. 25 +) in its natural position, with a long seta at middle and a field of sensillae above the seta, near the bend ( +Fig. 36 +). Pregonite ( +Figs. 33–35 +) a complex structure carrying a row of 5–6 setae along its dorsal ridge. This ridge strengthened and carrying a flange laterally, which is also strengthened along the middle, this strengthening forming an angle with the first strengthening. Pregonite distally with a long pointed process beyond the distalmost seta. This process lies alongside the distiphallus ( +Fig. 35 +). [It is lost on the left side.] + + +Ejaculatory sclerite narrow, weakly sclerotised distally ( +Fig. 37 +). + + +Female +. Unknown. + + + + +FIGURES 26–32 +. + +Mafikengia ciliata + + +sp. nov. + +, male holotype, aedeagus. +26 +. Aedeagus, left lateral view. +27 +. Distiphallus, right lateral view. +28 +. Distiphallus, dorsal view. +29 +. Distiphallus, slightly oblique anterodorsal view. +30 +. Distiphallus, ventral view. +31 +. Distiphallus, oblique anteroventral view. +32 +. Anterior view. + + + + +Biology. +The capture of the specimen on the “chimney” of a termite nest ( + +Odontotermes +sp. + +) suggests that it is biologically associated with termites. Nothing else is known. The identity of the mites found on its body might shed some light on whether they have been received from mites usually living in the termite’s nest (cf. + +Haq +et al +. 1990 + +). + + + + + +Type material +. + + + +Holotype + +: adult +♂ +, labelled: (1) “ +SOUTH AFRICA +: +NORTH WEST PROVINCE +// Mafikeng [as “ +Mafeking +” on some maps] + +24.ii.2007 + +// +25° 49' 10.10"S +/ +25° 37' 55.33"E +, ca + +1280m + +. // +S. Dupont +& +J. Pedersen +leg.” [printed] ( +Fig. 1 +, inset); (2) “ + +Neocordylobia +sp. + +” [printed]; (3) My red +holotype +label. The specimen was brought to +ZMUC +in 96% ethanol, and pinned and dried after dissection. The KOH macerated genitalia are now in glycerol in a glass vial on the pin. The left mid and hind legs were removed for molecular studies by +ZMUC +and have not been studied by me. All material is in +ZMUC +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7E/87/377E87DB975C5925FF2BFDD13BB7B653.xml b/data/37/7E/87/377E87DB975C5925FF2BFDD13BB7B653.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5a658e0843e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7E/87/377E87DB975C5925FF2BFDD13BB7B653.xml @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ + + + +A review of the monophyly and composition of the Bengaliinae with the description of a new genus and species, and new evidence for the presence of Melanomyinae in the Afrotropical Region (Diptera, Calliphoridae) 2964 + + + +Author + +Rognes, Knut + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2011 + +2011-07-13 + + +2964 + + +1 + + +1 +60 + + + + +https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.2964.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.2964.1.1 +1175­5334 +5281596 + + + + + + +Genus + +Mafikengia + +gen. nov. + + + + + + +Type +species: + +Mafikengia ciliata + + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +Etymology +. + +The name of the new genus is a feminine noun formed after the +type +locality, the city of Mafikeng in the +North West province +of +South Africa +, close to the border with +Botswana +. + + + + + +Diagnosis +. + +See diagnosis of the +type +species below. + + +The genus + +Mafikengia + + +gen. nov. + +has a single species, + +Mafikengia ciliata + + +sp. nov. + +, known only from the male sex. + + + + + +Distribution +. + +South Africa +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7E/B9/377EB9F4B94D51668924FBD7F2BBB624.xml b/data/37/7E/B9/377EB9F4B94D51668924FBD7F2BBB624.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7fbe92e3c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7E/B9/377EB9F4B94D51668924FBD7F2BBB624.xml @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ + + + +Nomenclatural changes in Coleus and Plectranthus (Lamiaceae): a tale of more than two genera + + + +Author + +Paton, Alan J. + + + +Author + +Mwanyambo, Montfort + + + +Author + +Govaerts, Rafael H. A. + + + +Author + +Smitha, Kokkaraniyil + + + +Author + +Suddee, Somran + + + +Author + +Phillipson, Peter B. + + + +Author + +Wilson, Trevor C. + + + +Author + +Forster, Paul I. + + + +Author + +Culham, Alastair + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2019 + +129 + + +1 +158 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.129.34988 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.129.34988 +1314-2003-129-1 +BF57C6B3C3065AEE9B4B3D47189C908F +3382366 + + + + +Coleus sigmoideus (A.J.Paton) A.J.Paton +comb. nov. + + + + +Plectranthus sigmoideus +A.J.Paton, Fl. Trop. E. Afr., Lamiac.: 333. 2009. Type: Zambia, track opposite turning to Mbala (Abercorn) Club, Richards 4353 (holotype: K). + + + +Distribution. +SW. Tanzania to Zambia. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7E/BE/377EBE6B926A404CF36C6A6614B29734.xml b/data/37/7E/BE/377EBE6B926A404CF36C6A6614B29734.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5bf9b8b3e7f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7E/BE/377EBE6B926A404CF36C6A6614B29734.xml @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ + + + +Order Chiroptera - Family Phyllostomidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +395 +426 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Mimon crenulatum +(E. Geoffroy 1803) + + + + + + + +[Phyllostoma] crenulatum +E. +Geoffroy 1803 + +, +Cat. Mamm. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat.: 61 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +Brazil +, +Bahia +; see +Handley (1960) +. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Striped Hairy-nosed Bat +. + + + + +Subspecies: +: + + +Subspecies + +Mimon crenulatum +subsp. +crenulatum +E. +Geoffroy 1803 + + + +Subspecies + +Mimon crenulatum +subsp. +keenani +Handley 1960 + + + +Subspecies + +Mimon crenulatum +subsp. +longifolium +Wagner 1843 + + + +Subspecies + +Mimon crenulatum +subsp. +picatum +Thomas 1903 + + + + + +Distribution: +Chiapas +and +Campeche +( +Mexico +) to Guianas, E +Brazil +, +Bolivia +, +Ecuador +and E +Peru +; +Trinidad +. + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +2003 and +IUCN +/ +SSC +Action Plan (2001) – Lower Risk (lc). + + + + +Discussion: +Does not include + +koepckeae + +; see +Gardner and Patton (1972) +. Reviewed by +Handley (1960) +, +Jones and Carter (1979) +, and + +Koopman (1978 +b +) + +. Because +Wilson and Reeder (1993) +did not treat names established in E. +Geoffroy (1803) +as available, +Koopman (1993) +attributed authorship of + +crenulatum + +to a later work by E. Geoffroy, but this name was actually published in the 1803 volume, which is now accepted ( + +Grubb, 2001 +a + +; Opinion 2005 of the + +International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 2002 +b + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7E/D7/377ED70FFFE98B6554903F3EFA9AFF7E.xml b/data/37/7E/D7/377ED70FFFE98B6554903F3EFA9AFF7E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a7bdea01575 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7E/D7/377ED70FFFE98B6554903F3EFA9AFF7E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,460 @@ + + + +Redescription of the Siberian species Pardosa jeniseica (Araneae: Lycosidae) + + + +Author + +Marusik, Yuri M. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2018 + +2018-10-08 + + +4497 + + +1 + + +141 +144 + + + +journal article +29230 +10.11646/zootaxa.4497.1.9 +a2d497c6-5ab2-4ec1-b881-86a094560923 +1175-5326 +1451144 +A3574098-4B56-489D-B873-DBF740419D2A + + + + + + + +Pardosa jeniseica +Eskov & Marusik, 1995 + +( +Figs 1–14 +) + + + + + + + + +Pardosa jeniseica + +Eskov & Marusik, 1995 +: 65 + + +, f. 64–65 ( +♂ +); + +Kronestedt 2013 +: 57 + +, f. 4 ( +♀ +); + +Azarkina & Trilikauskas 2013 +: 63 + +, f. 43– + + +44 (♀). + + + +Pardosa jeniseica +: + + +Esyunin +et al +. 1999 + +: 323 + + +, f. 1–2 ( +♀ +, misidentified). + + + +Faunistic records +: + +Marusik +et al +. (1992 + +, +2000 +); + +Marusik +et al +. (1993 + +: as + +Pardosa + +sp. 1); +Trilikauskas (2015) +. + + + + + +Material examined +: +Holotype +♂ +( +ZMMU +Ta-7665), +KAZAKHSTAN +, + +East-Kazakhstan +Area + +, +Zaisan Distr. +, +Karaungur River valley +( +Kendirlik River +basin), valley + +Populus + +forest, 18– + +23.06.1990 + +( +K.Y. Eskov +) + +. + +RUSSIA +: +1♂ +2♀ +( +ZMMU +), + +Krasnoyarsk + +Prov., +Turukhansk Dist. +, +Tsentralno-Sibirski Reserve +, +Yenisei R. +, +Komsa +kordon, +61.84°N +89.45°E +, + +25–30 m + +, 19– + +26.06.2016 + +( +V.K. Zinchenko +) + +; + +1♀ +( +ZMUT +), + +Buryatia + +, +Dzherginsky Reserve +, +Dzhirga +kordon, river valley, + +19.06.1996 + +( +S. Koponen +). + + + + + +Diagnosis +. + +Pardosa jeniseica + +belongs to the + +taczanowskii + +group of species. It differs from + +P. taczanowskii +( +Thorell, 1875 +) + +, and another congrupers, by the epigynal plate being longer than wide, base of septum longer than wide; +vs +. as long as wide plate, and base of septum wider than long (cf. +Figs 5–9 +, and fig. +3 in +Kronestedt 2013 +). Males of + +P. jeniseica + +can be easily distinguished from those of + +P. taczanowskii + +by the unswollen tibiae and much longer pubescence, metatarsi and tarsi of leg I, and unmodified palea (cf. +Figs 2 +, +10–14 +and figs +1–2 in +Kronestedt 2013 +). + + + + +Description +. Male. Total length 7.25 long. Carapace 3.2 long, 2.56 wide; almost uniformly dark brown, median light band poorly distinct around fovea. Length and spination of leg segments in tables 1 and 2. + + +Palp as in +Figs 4 +, +9–10, 12–13 +; all segments except patella and tip of cymbium dark brown, almost black, patella and tip of cymbium brown. Tibia long, about 0.57 of femur length; cymbium as long as femur. Tegulum not extended ventrally; tegular apophysis with long pointed anterior arm, 3 times longer than wide; terminal apophysis square shaped, as long as wide; palea not modified; embolus thick, with sharply pointed tip. + + + +FIGURES 1–8. +Habitus and copulatory organs of + +Pardosa jeniseica + +. 1, 3 female and male, dorsal; 2 male legs I–III, dorsal; 4 male palp, retrolateral; 5–6, 8 macerated epigyne, ventral; 7 intact epigyne, ventral. Scale = 0.2 mm if not otherwise indicated. Abbreviations: +Ap +anterior pocket; +Bs +base of septum; +Cd +copulatory duct; +Od +oval depression; +Ph +hood of pocket; +Rh +head of receptacle; +Ss +septal stem. + + +Female. Total length [largest and (smallest)] 10.5 (8.5). Carapace 3.75 (3.5) long, 3.0 (2.85) wide; dark brown; median light band more distinct than in male; sublateral light band broken into 3 small brown spots. Length of leg segments in table 1. Spination like that of male, except on Mt II which has 1 prolateral spine. + + +TABLE 1. +Leg length in male/female + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
FePtTiMtTaTotal
I3.0/3.31.25/1.552.75/3.353.0/3.01.6/1.511.6/12.7
II2.75/3.31.2/1.42.35/2.62.9/2.91.45/1.510.65/11.7
III2.6/3.251.1/1.352.2/2.53.15/2.851.4/1.510.45/11.45
IV3.35/4.01.25/1.553.05/3.53.25/5.051.75/2.012.65/16.1
+ + + +TABLE 2. +Leg spination in male + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
FePtTiMt
I3d 2(3)p 2r2d2p 2r 2-2v1p 2-2v
II3d 2p 2r2d2p 2r 2-2v2p 1r 2-2v
III3d 2p 2r2d 1p 1r2d 2p 2r 2-2v2p 2r 2-2v
IV3d 2p 1r2d 1p 1r2d 2p 2r 2-2v2p 2r 2-2v
+ + + +FIGURES 9–13. +SEM microphotographs of copulatory organs of + +Pardosa jeniseica + +. 9, 12–13 embolic division, posterioventral; anterior and ventral; 10 tegulum, ventral; 11 epigyne, ventral. Scale = 0.1 mm. Abbreviations: +Em +embolus; +Ta +terminal apophysis. + + + +Epigyne as in +Figs 5–8 +, +11 +; longer than wide; anterior pocket with 2 hoods; septum long, stem of septum ( +Ss +) as long as basal part; base of septum ( +Bs +) square shaped, about 1.5 times wider than anterior pocket; receptacles short, less that ½ of septum length, stretching parallel to each other, heads ( +Rh +) slightly wider than copulatory ducts ( +Cd +); heads separated by about 4 diameters. Posterior-lateral sides of endogyne with deep, well bordered oval depressions ( +Od +). + + +Habitats +. Throughout its range + +Pardosa jeniseica + +inhabits pebbly beaches along rivers and creeks. + + + + +Distribution +. The species is known from + +east +Kazakhstan + +(southernmost locality) to Kolyma River middle reaches, north to Verkhoyansk ( +67.55°N +, northernmost locality). The map shown on +Fig. 14 +is based on literature records and new data. Material from all localities except for those in +Altai +and +Khabarovsk +Province have been checked personally. Records of this species from the Urals are based on misidentifications (Esyunin, personal communication). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7F/7B/377F7BBEC7395274B365ED5BB0A36625.xml b/data/37/7F/7B/377F7BBEC7395274B365ED5BB0A36625.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eb7626f8f78 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7F/7B/377F7BBEC7395274B365ED5BB0A36625.xml @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ + + + +Bee species checklist of the San Francisco Peaks, Arizona + + + +Author + +McCabe, Lindsie M +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, United States of America +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9815-0581 +lma243@nau.edu + + + +Author + +Chesshire, Paige R +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, United States of America + + + +Author + +Smith, David R +U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Forest Science Complex, Flagstaff, United States of America + + + +Author + +Wolf, Atticus +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, United States of America + + + +Author + +Gibbs, Jason +Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4945-5423 + + + +Author + +Griswold, Terry L +USDA-ARS, Pollinating Insects Research Unit, Logan, United States of America + + + +Author + +Wright, Karen W +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M, College Station, United States of America + + + +Author + +Cobb, Neil S +Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, United States of America +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6155-9444 + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2020 + +8 + + +49285 +49285 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e49285 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e49285 +1314-2828-8-e49285 +7B7852D5E053597D964773508EBDC88A + + + + +Nomia (Acunomia) tetrazonata Cockerell, 1910 + + + +Notes +Last collected on the Peaks in 1936 + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7F/8B/377F8B2DD211FFC6FF27F40FFBDFFE09.xml b/data/37/7F/8B/377F8B2DD211FFC6FF27F40FFBDFFE09.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..38e2bfa100c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7F/8B/377F8B2DD211FFC6FF27F40FFBDFFE09.xml @@ -0,0 +1,488 @@ + + + +Two new species of Lepanthes (Pleurothallidinae, Orchidaceae) from the Alto de Ventanas, Colombia + + + +Author + +Vieira-Uribe, Sebastián +0000-0003-4325-1232 +Sociedad Colombiana de Orquideología, Carrera 52 # 73 - 298, Medellín, Colombia & Grupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad Tropical - GIBIOT, Jardín Botánico de Medellín, Calle 73 # 51 D- 14, Medellín, Colombia & Grupo de investigación Schultes, Fundación Ecotonos, Carrera 72 # 13 A- 56, Cali, Colombia & utricseb @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 4325 - 1232 +utricseb@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Moreno, Juan Sebastián +0000-0002-0875-9498 +Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle, Calle 13 # 100 - 00, Cali, Colombia & Grupo de investigación Schultes, Fundación Ecotonos, Carrera 72 # 13 A- 56, Cali, Colombia & semoreno 113 @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 0875 - 9498 +semoreno113@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Espinosa, Felipe +0000-0001-5932-7380 +Grupo de investigación Schultes, Fundación Ecotonos, Carrera 72 # 13 A- 56, Cali, Colombia & felipeespinosam @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5932 - 7380 +felipeespinosam@gmail.com + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2022 + +2022-10-04 + + +567 + + +2 + + +149 +161 + + + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.567.2.3 +1179-3163 +7141712 + + + + + +Lepanthes pembertonii +S.Vieira-Uribe & J.S.Moreno + +, + +sp. nov. + +( +Figures 1–3 +) + + + + +Type: +— + +COLOMBIA +. +Antioquia +: +Municipio de Valdivia +, +Reserva Natural La Esperanza +, + +2160 m + +, + +2 August 2017 + +, + +S. Vieira +29 + +( +holotype +JAUM-Spirit!) + +. + + + + + +Lepanthes pembertonii + +is most similar to + +L. viahoensis +Luer & R.Escobar (1997: 311) + +, both vegetatively and in the flowers, but + +L. pembertonii + +is easily differentiated in having petals with the upper lobe narrowly triangular ( +vs +. obliquely triangular), the lower lobe triangular ( +vs +. oblong, oblique at the apex) and the lip transversely bilobed with flabellate lobes and with an oblong, recurved, pubescent appendix in the sinus ( +vs +. subcordate lip with the apex broadly rounded, shortly incised, with a microscopic lobule in the sinus). + + + + +Description:— +Plant +epiphytic, sympodial, caespitose, sub-erect, up to +28 mm +tall. +Roots +slender, flexuous, filiform, +ca +. +0.6 mm +in diameter. +Ramicauls +slender, erect, up to +23 mm +long, enclosed by 6–7 brownish, ribbed, tightly adpressed lepanthiform sheaths, the ribs and the dilated margins papillose, acuminate. +Leaves +abaxially purple, thickly coriaceous, narrowly ovate, with one main central vein, the apex acute, incised and tri-apiculate, up to 21.0 × +4.8 mm +, the obtuse base narrowing into a petiole +ca +. +1 mm +long. +Inflorescence +a congested, distichous, successively many flowered raceme up to +7 mm +long, appressed to the abaxial surface of the leaf by a filiform peduncle up to +4 mm +long. +Floral bracts +ovate, acute, covered with filiform papillae, +ca +. +0.7 mm +long; +pedicel +0.9 mm +long. +Ovary +terete, costate, erose, +ca +. +0.7 mm +long. +Flowers +with the sepals semi-hyaline, primrose, suffused with crimson near the base, petals crimson with saffron margins, lip vermilion, column magenta with a white rostellum. +Sepals +membranaceous, fully spread, carinate along the veins on the abaxial surface. +Dorsal sepal +ovate, repand, acute, 3-veined, 2.4 × +1.2 mm +, connate to the lateral sepals for +ca +. +0.3 mm +. +Lateral sepals +broadly ovate, oblique, crenulate, attenuate, 2-veined, 1.9 × +1.4 mm +, connate for +ca +. +0.4 mm +. +Petals +transversely bilobed, puberulous, 0.6 × +2.7 mm +, 1-veined, with a minute rounded marginal mid-lobe, the upper lobe narrowly triangular, rounded, +1.8 mm +long; the lower lobe triangular, rounded, +0.9 mm +long, approximately ½ the length of the upper lobe. +Lip +puberulous, transversely bilobed, 0.8 × +1.1 mm +when expanded, the lobes flabellate with rounded ends, with thickened external margins, erect on both sides of the column, the sub-quadrate body deeply concave, with a marginal oblong, recurved, white, pubescent appendix in the middle; adnate to the base of the column. +Column +obconical, +0.9 mm +long, microscopically bullate, the anther apical, the stigma apical, with a minutely fimbriate rostellum. + +Pollinia + +2, yellow, obovoid, attached to a detachable viscidium. +Anther cap +cucullate, white, suffused with magenta. +Capsule +not seen. + + + + +Distribution & Ecology: +— + +Lepanthes pembertonii + +is only known from a small area in the north of the central Andes of +Colombia +. The +type +specimen was found with a few more plants of the same species growing on a single thin, moss-covered branch hanging 1.5 meters above the water of a small creek, inside a primary forest in La Esperanza Natural Reserve. This area, covered by Tropical Premontane Rainforest is particularly abundant in diversity of species of the genus + +Lepanthes + +. La Esperanza Natural Reserve is located in a very biodiverse region in the north of the central Andes of +Colombia +known as “Alto de Ventanas”, in the municipality of Valvidia in the +Antioquia department +. + + + + +Etymology: +—Named to honor Robert W. Pemberton, Entomologist/Botanist, and generous donor to the expansion of the natural reserve that protects the habitat of the new species. + + + + +Taxonomic Discussion +:— + +Lepanthes pembertonii + +, is both vegetatively and florally similar to + +L. anchicayae +J.S.Moreno & S. +Vieira-Uribe (2020: 100) + +, + +L. petalopteryx +Luer & R.Escobar (1994:106) + +and + +L. viahoensis +, + +all of them with small plants bearing narrowly ovate, thickly coriaceous leaves and minuscule flowers that open below the leaf blade and have membranaceous yellowish sepals, erect, puberulous petals and a blade-less, puberulous, transversely bilobed lip with the lobes erect and surrounding the column ( +Figure 3 +, +Table 1 +). + + + +FIGURE 1. +Drawing of + +Lepanthes pembertonii + +. +A. +Habit. +B. +Flower. +C. +Dissected perianth. +D. +Lip expanded. +E. +Ovary, column and lip, dorsal and lateral views. Drawn by S.Vieira-Uribe from the plant that served as type. + + + + +TABLE 1. +Summary of the main differences between + +Lepanthes pembertonii + +and morphologically similar species. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Trait + + +L. anchicayae + + + +L. pembertonii + + + +L. petalopteryx + + +L. viahoensis +
+Lip +Transversely bilobed, the lobes cuneate. The apex retuse with a wide sinus.Transversely bilobed, the lobes flabellate with thickened external margins.Reniform, with the basal angles narrowly rounded, the apex broadly rounded, shallowly incised.Subcordate, with the apex broadly rounded, shortly incised.
+Lip (appendix) +Absent.Oblong, recurved, pubescent.Absent.A microscopic lobule in the sinus.
+Lip (color) +BurgundyVermilionOrangeVermilion
+Petals (upper lobe) +Ovate, oblique, with a second point midway on the inner marginNarrowly triangular, rounded.Obliquely subquadrate or oblong, obliquely truncate with the inner angles shortly acuminate-obtuse, the outer angles subacute.Obliquely triangular, narrowly rounded at the apex.
+Petals (lower lobe) +Triangular, oblique, with the apex attenuate, incurved. Shorter than the upper lobe.Triangular, rounded. ½ the length of the upper lobe.Obliquely subquadrate or oblong, obliquely truncate with the inner angles shortly acuminate-obtuse, the outer angles subacute.Oblong, oblique at the apex. Shorter than the upper lobe.
+Petals (color) +Orange, strongly suffused with burgundy at the baseCrimson with saffron margins. The upper lobe apices sometimes crimson.Bright yellow with orange at the base.Saffron, suffused with crimson near the base.
+ + + +FIGURE 2. +Photos of + +Lepanthes pembertonii + +. +A. +Plant in habitat. +B. +Plant in habitat as viewed from the underside. +C. +Flower. Photographs by S.Vieira-Uribe from the plant that served as type. + + + + +FIGURE 3. +Comparison of the flower of + +Lepanthes pembertonii + +with similar species. +A. + +L. anchicayae + +. +B. + +L. pembertonii + +. +C. + +L. petalopteryx +. + +D. + +L. viahoensis + +. Photographs by J.S. Moreno (A) and S. Vieira-Uribe (B,C,D). + + + +From + +Lepanthes anchicayae + +( +Figure 3A +), it is easily separated by the narrowly triangular upper lobes of the petals ( +vs. +ovate, oblique, with a second point midway on the inner margin) and the lip with flabellate lobes ( +vs. +cuneate) with an oblong, recurved and pubescent appendix in the sinus ( +vs. +no appendix). From + +Lepanthes petalopteryx + +( +Figure 3C +), it is differentiated by the leaves abaxially purple ( +vs. +green), the petals with triangular lobes, the lower one ½ the length of the upper one ( +vs. +equally sized lobes that are obliquely subquadrate or oblong, obliquely truncate with the inner angles shortly acuminate-obtuse, the outer angles subacute) and the lip with flabellate lobes ( +vs. +reniform lip) with an oblong, recurved, pubescent appendix ( +vs. +no appendix). Finally, from + +Lepanthes viahoensis + +( +Figure 3D +), the most similar species both, in plant and flower color and morphology, it is separated by having the petals with the upper lobe narrowly triangular ( +vs. +obliquely triangular), the lower lobe triangular ( +vs. +oblong, oblique at the apex) and the lip transversely bilobed with flabellate lobes ( +vs. +subcordate lip) with an oblong, recurved, pubescent appendix in the sinus of the body ( +vs. +no lip body, and a microscopic lobule in the sinus). +Table 1 +shows a comparative summary of differences between + +Lepanthes pembertonii + +and the already mentioned similar species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/7F/8B/377F8B2DD214FFCAFF27F193FE98FB31.xml b/data/37/7F/8B/377F8B2DD214FFCAFF27F193FE98FB31.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..52bd8fe3053 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/7F/8B/377F8B2DD214FFCAFF27F193FE98FB31.xml @@ -0,0 +1,343 @@ + + + +Two new species of Lepanthes (Pleurothallidinae, Orchidaceae) from the Alto de Ventanas, Colombia + + + +Author + +Vieira-Uribe, Sebastián +0000-0003-4325-1232 +Sociedad Colombiana de Orquideología, Carrera 52 # 73 - 298, Medellín, Colombia & Grupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad Tropical - GIBIOT, Jardín Botánico de Medellín, Calle 73 # 51 D- 14, Medellín, Colombia & Grupo de investigación Schultes, Fundación Ecotonos, Carrera 72 # 13 A- 56, Cali, Colombia & utricseb @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 4325 - 1232 +utricseb@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Moreno, Juan Sebastián +0000-0002-0875-9498 +Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle, Calle 13 # 100 - 00, Cali, Colombia & Grupo de investigación Schultes, Fundación Ecotonos, Carrera 72 # 13 A- 56, Cali, Colombia & semoreno 113 @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 0875 - 9498 +semoreno113@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Espinosa, Felipe +0000-0001-5932-7380 +Grupo de investigación Schultes, Fundación Ecotonos, Carrera 72 # 13 A- 56, Cali, Colombia & felipeespinosam @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 5932 - 7380 +felipeespinosam@gmail.com + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2022 + +2022-10-04 + + +567 + + +2 + + +149 +161 + + + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.567.2.3 +1179-3163 +7141712 + + + + + +Lepanthes hwangiae +J.S.Moreno & S.Vieira-Uribe + +, + +sp. nov. + +( +Figures 4 +, +5 +, +7 +) + + + + +Type: +— + +COLOMBIA +. +Antioquia +: +Municipio de Valdivia +, +Reserva Natural La Esperanza +, +Cloud forest +, epiphyte in thin branches next to the entrance to the reserve, + +2160 m + +, + +31 january 2022 + +, + +S.Vieira +30 + +( +holotype +: JAUM-Spirit!) + +. + + + + + +Lepanthes hwangiae + +is most similar to + +L. cyclochila +Luer & R.Escobar ex Viveros & W.E. Higgins (2007: 34) + +, but it can be distinguished by its transversally bilobed petals with the upper lobe bifurcate in unequal lobes, with the external lobe triangular, obtuse and the internal lobe oblong, obtuse ( +vs. +the upper lobe obliquely truncate) and the lower lobe oblong and rounded ( +vs +. lower lobe oblong, shallowly bifurcate into 2 triangular, narrowly rounded lobes) and the lip sub-circular, slightly emarginate, with the oblong and rounded basal lobes erect, embracing the column and touching each other well above the column ( +vs +. sub-quadrate, markedly emarginate, with the shortly triangular and obtuse basal lobes of the lip erect on each side of the column without touching each other). (Figures 6,7). + + + + +FIGURE 6. +Lankester composite dissection plate (LCDP) of + +Lepanthes cyclochila +. + +A. +Habit. +B. +Flower. +C. +Dissected perianth with lip expanded. +D. +Ovary, column and lip, lateral and dorsal view. +E. +Pollinarium and anther cap. Photographed by S.Vieira-Uribe and assembled by J.S.Moreno. + + + + +FIGURE 7. +Side by side comparison of + +Lepanthes cyclochila + +and + +L.hwangiae +. + +A. +Flowers, 1. + +L. hwangiae +, + +2. + +L.cyclochila +. + +B. +Ovary, column and lip, lateral view. 1. + +L. hwangiae +, + +2. + +L.cyclochila +. + +C. +Expanded lip. 1. + +L. hwangiae +, + +2. + +L.cyclochila +. + +D. +Petal. 1. + +L. hwangiae +, + +2. + +L.cyclochila +. + +Photographed by S.Vieira-Uribe and assembled by J.S.Moreno. + + + + +Description:— +Plant +, epiphytic, caespitose, up to +3 cm +tall. +Roots +slender, flexuous, filiform, +0.6 mm +in diameter. +Ramicauls +slender, suberect, +1.2–2.4 cm +long, enclosed by 7–9 acuminate, ribbed, microscopically ciliate along the ribs lepanthiform sheaths, with ciliate dilated ostia. +Leaves +abaxially purple, elliptical, the apex acute, incised and tri-apiculate, 1.2–1.7 × +0.5–0.6 cm +, the cuneate base contracted into a +ca +. +1 mm +long petiole. +Inflorescence +a congested, distichous raceme successively many-flowered, up to 1/2 the length of the leaf, +0.6–0.9 cm +long including the peduncle, held on the abaxial surface of the leaf by a filiform, terete peduncle up to +5 mm +long borne near the apex of the ramicaul. +Floral bracts +conical, ciliate, acuminate, up to +0.7 mm +long; +pedicels +terete, verrucose, up to +1.5 mm +long. +Ovary +terete, costate, verrucose along the ribs, ca. +1.1 mm +long. +Flowers +with the sepals translucent saffron; petals saffron with the base suffused with crimson; the lip magenta with fulvous-saffron margins, the column pale gray with the apex magenta. +Dorsal sepal +elliptic, with papillose margins towards the apex, acuminate, 3-veined, 2.3 × +1.4 mm +, connate at the base to the lateral sepals for +ca +. +0.25 mm +. +Lateral sepals +ovate-elliptic, oblique, with papillose margins towards the apex, the apex acute, sub-acuminate, 2-veined, 1.9–2.0 × +1.2–1.3 mm +, connate at the base for ca. +0.25 mm +. +Petals +transversally bilobed, microscopically pubescent, 0.8 × +3.8 mm +, 1 veined; the upper lobe oblong bifurcate in unequal lobes, the external lobe triangular, obtuse, the internal lobe oblong, obtuse, +1.7 mm +long; the lower lobe oblong, rounded, 2.0 mm long. +Lip +microscopically pubescent, sub-circular, bilobed, with the oblong and rounded basal lobes erect, embracing the column and touching each other well above the column, the apex rounded, emarginate, with a small apiculum in the sinus, 3-veined, 2.1 × 2.0 mm expanded, the base adnate to the base of the column. +Column +conical, terete, +ca. +1.2 mm +long including the rostellum, the anther dorsal, the stigma ventral. +Anther cap +purple, cordate, cucullate, +0.5 mm +long. +Pollinia +2, yellow, narrowly obovoid, +ca +. +0.6 mm +long, attached to a drop like viscidium. +Capsule +not seen. + + + + +Distribution and ecology +:— + +Lepanthes hwangiae + +is known from two localities in the Alto de Ventanas region in the north of the central Andes of +Colombia +, just a few kilometers apart and with the same elevation. It grows as an epiphyte in thin, moss-covered branches no more than +1 meter +from the ground, in partially shaded and humid areas inside primary and secondary cloud forests. + + + + +Etymology +:—Named to honor Joanne Hwang Pemberton, wife of Robert W. Pemberton, generous donor to the expansion of the natural reserve that protects the habitat of the new species. + + + + +Taxonomic Discussion +:— + +Lepanthes hwangiae + +is also similar to + +L. petalopteryx + +( +Figure 3C +), but this latter species could be recognized by the petals with both lobes similar, obliquely subquadrate or oblong, oblique, with the inner angles shortly acuminate-obtuse, the outer angles subacute, the outer angles obtusely angled at the center ( +vs +. the upper lobe oblong bifurcate in unequal lobes, the external lobe triangular, obtuse, the internal lobe oblong, obtuse and the lower lobe oblong, rounded). Finally, the lip in + +L. petalopteryx + +is reniform with the lobes surrounding the column without touching each other ( +vs +. sub-circular, embracing the column and touching each other well above the column) ( +Figure 3C +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/80/0C/37800CE20E33B8C0376A6E135FFD459D.xml b/data/37/80/0C/37800CE20E33B8C0376A6E135FFD459D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e6eec225722 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/80/0C/37800CE20E33B8C0376A6E135FFD459D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part S) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +806 +877 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Scilla bifolia +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +1 + +: 309. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Gallia, Germania." RCN: 2432. + + + + +Lectotype +(van Raamsdonk in Wisskirchen in +Feddes Repert. +108: 106. 1997): Herb. Burser III: 23 ( +UPS +) + +. + + + + +Generitype +of + +Scilla +Linnaeus + +(vide Hitchcock, +Prop. Brit. Bot +.: 146. 1929). + + + + +Current name: + + +Scilla bifolia + +L. + +( +Liliaceae +/ +Hyacinthaceae +). + + + + +Note: +Speta (in +Naturk. Jahrb. Stadt Linz +25: 41. 1980) designated 429.5 (LINN) as the type. However, this sheet came from Hasselquist, from the "Middle East" conflicting with +Linnaeus' +"Hab. in Gallia, Germania". Van Raamsdonk therefore rejected this choice in favour of the Burser sheet, formalising the suggestion made by Andersson (in Strid & Kit Tan, +Mountain Fl. Greece +2: 694. 1991). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/80/17/37801723AD73359EC36478FE49DC7EEC.xml b/data/37/80/17/37801723AD73359EC36478FE49DC7EEC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..999790b330a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/80/17/37801723AD73359EC36478FE49DC7EEC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - aculeates (Apoidea, Chrysidoidea and Vespoidea) + + + +Author + +Else, George R. + + + +Author + +Bolton, Barry + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8050 +8050 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8050 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8050 +1314-2828--8050 + + + + +Lasioglossum (Hemihalictus) villosulum (Kirby, 1802) + + + + +Melitta villosula +Kirby, 1802 + + +punctulatum +(Kirby, 1802, +Melitta +) + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Isle of Man + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/80/47/378047697B995DD99580D30F5F3C2888.xml b/data/37/80/47/378047697B995DD99580D30F5F3C2888.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..17410673a56 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/80/47/378047697B995DD99580D30F5F3C2888.xml @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + +Order Dasyuromorphia + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +22 +37 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Dasyurus spartacus +Van Dyck 1987 + + + + + + + +Dasyurus spartacus +Van Dyck 1987 + +, +Aust. Mammal., 11: 145 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +Papua New Guinea +, Trans-fly Plains, Marehead, +8°41'S +, +141°39'E +. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Bronze Quoll +. + + + + +Distribution: +Fly Plains, +Papua New Guinea +. + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +– Vulnerable. + + + + +Discussion: +Formerly included in + +D. geoffroii + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/80/4E/37804E21033165208B575AC8F45E3861.xml b/data/37/80/4E/37804E21033165208B575AC8F45E3861.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1815ce9dde3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/80/4E/37804E21033165208B575AC8F45E3861.xml @@ -0,0 +1,833 @@ + + + +Biodiversity inventories in high gear: DNA barcoding facilitates a rapid biotic survey of a temperate nature reserve + + + +Author + +Telfer, Angela C +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +atelfer@uoguelph.ca + + + +Author + +Young, Monica R +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Quinn, Jenna +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Perez, Kate +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sobel, Crystal N +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sones, Jayme E +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Levesque-Beaudin, Valerie +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Derbyshire, Rachael +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Fernandez-Triana, Jose +CNC, Ottawa, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0425-0309 + + + +Author + +Rougerie, Rodolphe +Museum national d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France + + + +Author + +Thevanayagam, Abinah +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Boskovic, Adrian +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Borisenko, Alex V +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3061-3057 + + + +Author + +Cadel, Alex +University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada + + + +Author + +Brown, Allison +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Pages, Anais +Universite de Montpellier, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Castillo, Anibal H +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1537-0528 + + + +Author + +Nicolai, Annegret +EcoBio, Universite of Rennes, Rennes, France + + + +Author + +Glenn Mockford, Barb Mockford +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Bukowski, Belen +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Wilson, Bill +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Trojahn, Brock +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Lacroix, Carole Ann +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Herbarium, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Brimblecombe, Chris +University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand + + + +Author + +Hay, Christoper +University of Western Ontario, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Ho, Christmas +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Steinke, Claudia +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Warne, Connor P +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Garrido Cortes, Cristina +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Engelking, Daniel +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Wright, Danielle +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lijtmaer, Dario A +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Gascoigne, David +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Hernandez Martich, David +Universidad Autonoma de Santo Domingo DR, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic + + + +Author + +Morningstar, Derek +Myotistar, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Neumann, Dirk +SNSB, Zoologische Staatssammlung Muenchen, Munich, Germany + + + +Author + +Steinke, Dirk +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Marco DeBruin, Donna DeBruin +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Dobias, Dylan +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sears, Elizabeth +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Richard, Ellen +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Damstra, Emily +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Zakharov, Evgeny V +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Laberge, Frederic +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Collins, Gemma E +University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand + + + +Author + +Blagoev, Gergin A +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Grainge, Gerrie +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Ansell, Graham +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Meredith, Greg +Grand River Conservation Authority, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Hogg, Ian +University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand + + + +Author + +McKeown, Jaclyn +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Topan, Janet +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Bracey, Jason +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Guenther, Jerry +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Sills-Gilligan, Jesse +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Addesi, Joseph +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Persi, Joshua +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Layton, Kara K S +The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia + + + +Author + +D'Souza, Kareina +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Dorji, Kencho +National Biodiversity Centre, Thimphu, Bhutan + + + +Author + +Grundy, Kevin +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Nghidinwa, Kirsti +Ministry of Environment and Tourism in Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia + + + +Author + +Ronnenberg, Kylee +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lee, Kyung Min +University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland + + + +Author + +Xie, Linxi +The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Lu, Liuqiong +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Penev, Lyubomir +Pensoft, Sofia, Bulgaria +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2186-5033 + + + +Author + +Gonzalez, Mailyn +Instituto de Investigacion de Recursos Biologicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogota, Colombia + + + +Author + +Rosati, Margaret E +Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, United States of America + + + +Author + +Kekkonen, Mari +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Kuzmina, Maria +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Iskandar, Marianne +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Mutanen, Marko +University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland + + + +Author + +Fatahi, Maryam +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Pentinsaari, Mikko +University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland + + + +Author + +Bauman, Miriam +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Nikolova, Nadya +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Ivanova, Natalia V +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Jones, Nathaniel +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Weerasuriya, Nimalka +The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Monkhouse, Norman +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lavinia, Pablo D +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Jannetta, Paul +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Hanisch, Priscila E +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +McMullin, R. Troy +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Herbarium, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Ojeda Flores, Rafael +Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico + + + +Author + +Mouttet, Raphaelle +ANSES, Laboratoire de la Sante des Vegetaux, Montferrier sur Lez, France + + + +Author + +Vender, Reid +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Labbee, Renee N +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Forsyth, Robert +New Brunswick Museum, Saint John, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9637-0158 + + + +Author + +Lauder, Rob +London Homeopathy, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Dickson, Ross +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Kroft, Ruth +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Miller, Scott E +Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, United States of America + + + +Author + +MacDonald, Shannon +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Panthi, Sishir +Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal + + + +Author + +Pedersen, Stephanie +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sobek-Swant, Stephanie +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Naik, Suresh +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lipinskaya, Tatsiana +Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus + + + +Author + +Eagalle, Thanushi +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Decaens, Thibaud +Universite de Montpellier Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Kosuth, Thibault +Universite de Montpellier, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Braukmann, Thomas +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Woodcock, Tom +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Roslin, Tomas +University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland + + + +Author + +Zammit, Tony +Grand River Conservation Authority, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Campbell, Victoria +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Dinca, Vlad +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Peneva, Vlada +Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria + + + +Author + +Hebert, Paul D N +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +deWaard, Jeremy R +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +dewaardj@uoguelph.ca + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +6313 +6313 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6313 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6313 +1314-2828-3-e6313 +FFE5FF837519E9253D17614AFFA8FFC1 +574474 + + + + +Taxonus pallicoxus Provancher 1885 + + + +Notes +BOLD:AAG7788 + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/81/09/378109656CF18AD961CC3CACA98EE4A0.xml b/data/37/81/09/378109656CF18AD961CC3CACA98EE4A0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..081ade19dea --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/81/09/378109656CF18AD961CC3CACA98EE4A0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Agrothereutes mandator (Linnaeus, 1758) + + + + +Ichneumon mandator +Linnaeus, 1758 + + +ischioleucus +(Gravenhorst, 1829, +Cryptus +) synonymy by +Schwarz (2005) + + +cimbicis +(Tschek, 1871, +Cryptus +) + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/81/98/378198D67B45B01E72EE51F66EDB608D.xml b/data/37/81/98/378198D67B45B01E72EE51F66EDB608D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ef39bfbcb89 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/81/98/378198D67B45B01E72EE51F66EDB608D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,276 @@ + + + +Revision of the European species of Omphale Haliday (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Eulophidae) + + + +Author + +Hansson, Christer + + + +Author + +Shevtsova, Ekaterina + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +232 + + +1 +157 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.232.3625 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.232.3625 +1313-2970-232-1 + + + + + +Omphale +obscura ( +Foerster +) + +comb.n. +Figures 369-383498529 + + + + +Elachestus obscurus +Foerster +, 1841:40. Lectotype female in NMW, examined. + + +Holcopelte obscura +( +Foerster +), + +Foerster +(1856) + +. + + +Derostenus obscurus +( +Foerster +), +Thomson (1878) +. + + +Holcopelte fulvipes +Foerster +, 1861. Type not located. Synonymized by + +Boucek +and Askew (1968) + +. + + +Horismenus obscurus +( +Foerster +), +Schmiedeknecht (1909) +. + + +Holcopelte obscura +( +Foerster +), +Graham (1959) +. + + +Holcopelte obscura +( +Foerster +), + +Boucek +(1971) + +. + + + +Material. + +Type material.Holotype female of +Elachestus obscurus +in NMW. Additional material. 69♀ 2♂: France 1♀ (BMNH), Hungary 5# (BMNH), Russia 7♀ 1♂ (BMNH, CH), Sweden 41♀ (BMNH, CH, LUZM, NHRS), United Kingdom 16♀ 1♂ (BMNH). + + + +Diagnosis. + +Frons and vertex smooth and shiny (Figs 378, 379, 382, 383); clypeus more or less triangular (Figs 378, 382); occipital margin with a sharp carina (Figs 379, 383); male scape with a sharp dent apicoventrally; midlobe of mesoscutum with a longitudinal groove in posteromedian ⅓ (Figs 376, 380); scutellum in some specimens with a weak median groove in anterior +1/4 +to complete (Fig. 376); dorsellum concave and sharply margined (Figs 376, 380); propodeum smooth with a wide and shallow groove along anterior margin, with a narrow median carina and laterally with a longitudinal carina close to spiracular sulcus (Fig. 376); petiole 0.7 +x +as long as wide with irregular sculpture, narrows off in anterior part. + + + +Description. + +Female. Length of body 0.9-1.8 mm. Antenna with scape yellowish white with dorsal part yellowish brown; pedicel brown with apex yellowish brown; flagellum brown; pedicel + flagellum 2.1 +x +as long as distance between eyes; first flagellomere 0.9 +x +as long and 1.3 +x +as wide as second flagellomere (Fig. 377); flagellomeres 1-4 with long setae in a basal whorl, with some setae reaching beyond apex of flagellomere attached to, and with short setae apical to whorl; clava 1-segmented. Face dark brown metallic, black metallic, or green metallic (Fig. 372), smooth to strigose (Fig. 378); clypeus with same colour as face, smooth to weakly strigose, triangular, 1.1 +x +as wide (width measured at mouth margin) as high; gena dark brown to black metallic; lower frons with same colour as face, smooth; interscrobal area smooth; antennal scrobes join on or just below frontal suture; frontal suture V-shaped; upper frons dark brown to black metallic with green tinges; vertex dark brown to black metallic with purple tinges, smooth (Fig. 379). Occipital margin with a sharp carina (Fig. 379). + + +Mesoscutum dark brown to black metallic (Fig. 370) with engraved reticulation (Fig. 376), midlobe with two pairs of setae; notauli as indistinct impressions in posterior +1/2 +, impressions smooth in some specimens, with a longitudinal groove in posteromedian ⅓. Scutellum dark brown to black metallic (Fig. 370) with engraved +reticulation +(Fig. 376), in some specimens with a weak median groove in anterior +1/4-1/2 +; 1.2 +x +as long as wide, with anteromedian margin protruding forwards. Axillae dark brown to black metallic (Fig. 370). Dorsellum dark brown to black metallic (Fig. 370) +, +tongue like (Fig. 376), concave and sharply margined, laterally with longitudinal carinae, 0.4 +x +as long as wide, and 0.3 +x +as long as length of median propodeum. Entire lateral mesosoma dark brown to black metallic (Fig. 369); transepimeral sulcus weakly curved forwards. Propodeum dark brown to black metallic (Fig. 370), smooth or with weak sculpture (Fig. 376), with a wide and shallow groove along anterior margin, with a narrow median carina, laterally with a longitudinal carina close to spiracular sulcus; propodeal callus with two setae. Legs yellowish white to yellowish brown (Fig. 369), forecoxa sometimes pale brown; midleg with first tarsomere 0.3 +x +as long as length of tarsus. Forewing transparent, veins yellow, setae dark brown (Fig. 374); speculum +closed +; admarginal setae 10-13, arising mainly from wing membrane; radial cell setose; postmarginal vein 0.6 +x +as long as stigmal vein; stigmal vein long and slender; marginal fringe with hairs as long as length of stigmal vein. Hind wing transparent, apex pointed (Fig. 374). Forewing WIP (Fig. 375) with apical +1/2 +magenta, basal +1/2 +with bands in blue, yellow and magenta. + + +Petiole yellowish brown, dorsal surface 0.7 +x +as long as wide with irregular sculpture. Gaster dark brown to black metallic, smooth, elongate and 1.0 +-1.4x +as long as length of mesosoma; 7th tergite 0.06 +x +as long as length of gaster. + + +Male. Length of body 1.2 mm. Features as in female except as follows. Antenna with scape dark yellowish brown with dorsal edge dark brown; pedicel and flagellum dark brown; pedicel + flagellum 1.9 +x +as long as distance between eyes; flagello-meres 1-4 with verticillate setae and with setae reaching beyond apex of flagellomere attached to (Fig. 381); clava 1-segmented. Face bright metallic green (Fig. 373), smooth with striae close to clypeus (Fig. 382); clypeus bright metallic green, weakly strigose, triangular to almost semicircular, 1.4 +x +as wide as high; gena black metallic; lower frons golden with green tinges; antennal scrobes join on frontal suture; upper frons golden, smooth; vertex golden. + + +Mesoscutum black metallic with golden tinges (Fig. 371). Scutellum black metallic with golden tinges (Fig. 371). Axillae black metallic with golden tinges (Fig. 371). Dorsellum black metallic (Fig. 371). Entire lateral mesosoma dark brown metallic (Fig. 369). Propodeum black metallic (Fig. 371). Foreleg with coxa dark brown, femur yellowish brown, tibia and tarsus yellow; midleg with coxa pale brown, femur, tibia and tarsus yellow; hind leg with coxa pale brown with base dark brown, femur yellowish brown, tibia and tarsus yellow. Forewing with veins pale brown; admarginal setae 10, arising mainly from wing membrane; postmarginal vein 0.8 +x +as long as stigmal vein. + + +Petiole dark brown, as long as wide, narrows off in anterior part. Gaster black metallic, smooth, 1.0 +x +as long as length of mesosoma. Phallobase and aedeagus as in Fig. 498. + + + +Figures 369-375. +Omphale obscura +: 369 habitus in lateral view, female, length of specimen 1.4 mm 370 thoracic dorsum, female 371 thoracic dorsum, male 372 head in frontal view, female 373 head in frontal view, male 374 transparent wings, female 375 wing interference patterns, female. + + + + +Figures 376-383. +Omphale obscura +: 376 thoracic dorsum, female 377 antenna, female 378 head in frontal view, female 379 vertex, female 380 thoracic dorsum, male 381 antenna, male 382 head in frontal view, male 383 vertex, male. + + + + +Hosts. + +Dasineura viciae +( +Diptera +: +Cecidomyiidae +) ( +De Stefani 1905 +); unidentified budgall on +Galium mollugo +( + +Boucek +and Askew 1968 + +). + + + +Distribution. + +Austria ( +Kirchner 1867 +), Czech Republic ( + +Boucek +1957 + +), France (new record), Germany ( + +Foerster +1841 + +), Hungary ( + +Erdoes +1956 + +), Italy ( +De Stefani 1905 +), Russia (new record), Sweden ( +Thomson 1878 +), Switzerland ( + +Foerster +1861 + +), United Kingdom ( +Graham 1959 +), Yugoslavia ( + +Boucek +and Askew 1968 + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/82/06/37820612A313589DA03D6F890EE0127B.xml b/data/37/82/06/37820612A313589DA03D6F890EE0127B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bba2fcf500d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/82/06/37820612A313589DA03D6F890EE0127B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,392 @@ + + + +First records of the fanged frogs Limnonectes bannaensis Ye, Fei & Jiang, 2007 and L. utara Matsui, Belabut & Ahmad, 2014 (Amphibia: Anura: Dicroglossidae) in Thailand + + + +Author + +Suwannapoom, Chatmongkon +Division of Fishery, School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand +chatmongkonup@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Jiang, Ke +CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China + + + +Author + +Wu, Yun-He +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3189-1091 +State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China + + + +Author + +Pawangkhanant, Parinya +Division of Fishery, School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand + + + +Author + +Lorphengsy, Sengvilay +Division of Biotechnology, School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand + + + +Author + +Nguyen, Tan Van +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5413-968X +Department of Species Conservation, Save Vietnam's Wildlife ,, Ninh Binh, Vietnam + + + +Author + +Poyarkov, Nikolay A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7576-2283 +Faculty of Biology, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Moscow, Russia & Laboratory of Tropical Ecology, Joint Russian-Vietnamese Tropical Research and Technological Center, Hanoi, Vietnam + + + +Author + +Che, Jing +State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China +chej@mail.kiz.ac.cn + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2021 + +2021-07-13 + + +9 + + +67253 +67253 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e67253 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e67253 +1314-2828-9-e67253 +AD99F018EF2D5DF9B45886B841C2B38B + + + + +Limnonectes bannaensis Ye, Fei, Xie & Jiang, 2007 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: + +Other material +. + +Occurrence +: + +catalogNumber: +AUP-00481 +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; + +Taxon +: + +scientificName: +Limnonectes +bannaensis; class: +Amphibia +; order: +Anura +; family: +Dicroglossidae +; genus: +Limnonectes +; specificEpithet: bannaensis; scientificNameAuthorship: +Ye +, +Fei +, +Xie +& +Jiang +, 2007; + +Location +: + +country: +Thailand +; countryCode: TL; stateProvince: +Nan +; locality: +Doi Phu Kha +; verbatimElevation: +750 +; verbatimLatitude: +19°03'21.3"N +; verbatimLongitude: +101°10'47.8"E +; + +Event +: + +eventDate: + +17 +December +, 2017 + +; fieldNotes: collected by + +C. +Suwannapoom, P + +. Pawangkhanant; + +Record Level +: + +language: en; collectionCode: +Amphibians +; basisOfRecord: + +Preserved Specimen + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +catalogNumber: AUP-00482; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +adult male +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Limnonectes bannaensis; +Record Level: +basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen; dynamicProperties: collection date, collector and Location as the AUP-00481 + + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +catalogNumber: AUP-00483; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +adult male +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Limnonectes bannaensis; +Record Level: +basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen; dynamicProperties: collection date, collector and Location as the AUP-00481 + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +catalogNumber: AUP-00484; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +adult male +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Limnonectes bannaensis; +Record Level: +basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen; dynamicProperties: collection date, collector and Location as the AUP-00481 + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +catalogNumber: AUP-00485; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +adult male +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Limnonectes bannaensis; +Record Level: +basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen; dynamicProperties: collection date, collector and Location as the AUP-00481 + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +catalogNumber: AUP-00486; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +adult male +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Limnonectes bannaensis; +Record Level: +basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen; dynamicProperties: collection date, collector and Location as the AUP-00481 + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +catalogNumber: AUP-00487; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +adult male +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Limnonectes bannaensis; +Record Level: +basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen; dynamicProperties: collection date, collector and Location as the AUP-00481 + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +catalogNumber: AUP-00488; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +adult male +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Limnonectes bannaensis; +Record Level: +basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen; dynamicProperties: collection date, collector and Location as the AUP-00481 + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +catalogNumber: AUP-00489; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +adult female +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Limnonectes bannaensis; +Record Level: +basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen; dynamicProperties: collection date, collector and Location as the AUP-00481 + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +catalogNumber: AUP-00490; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +adult male +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Limnonectes bannaensis; +Record Level: +basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen; dynamicProperties: collection date, collector and Location as the AUP-00481 + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +catalogNumber: AUP-00491; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +adult female +; +Taxon: +scientificName: Limnonectes bannaensis; +Record Level: +basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen; dynamicProperties: collection date, collector and Location as the AUP-00481 + + + + +Description + +Morphological characters of specimens from Nan Province agreed with the descriptions by +Ye et al. (2007) +. Large body size, with males SVL of 80.7 mm (n = 9) and females SVL of 75.4 mm (n = 2). The complete morphometric description of each specimen is presented in Suppl. material 2. They are morphologically distinct in comparison between sexes. Males can be distinguished from females by the dorsal skin texture of the male appearing to be smoother, with less tubercles, supratympanic fold dark brown, indistinct, throat heavily pigmented. Head longer than wide (males HL of 36.8 mm, HW 34.9 mm, n = 9 and females HL of 34.9 mm, HW 32.9 mm, n = 2). Fore limbs robust, relatively short, fingers moderately slender, finger length formula: II<I <IV <III (Fig. +3 +D), toe length formula: I <II <V <III <IV (Fig. +3 +E), tips of toes expanded into round elevated pads lacking grooves, toe webbing well-developed, complete, webbing formula: I 0 - 0 II 0 - 0 III 0 - 0 IV 0 - 0 V. Skin on dorsum weakly granulated with few fine folds on the back and a few small rounded tubercles scattered on the rear of the dorsum, ventrally smooth. Colouration in life: black stripes present on areas around the folds (Fig. +3 +A and C), dorsum light red brown with confluent dark brown markings (Fig. +3 +A and B and Fig. +4 +), dark transverse bars on upper surface of hind limbs, side of head and lateral surfaces of body lighter brown, lower lip white marbled with brown, belly white with brown vermiform markings, dark brown bar between eyes edged with thin yellowish-brown bars, lower half of iris golden, upper half brown, separated by a dark brown horizontal band, nuptial pad white. Colouration in preservative: after three years in preservative, the colouration pattern did not change, dorsal and lateral body colouration faded to brown, dark brown bars on upper lip turned less distinct, lower lip turned dark with light mottling, ventre immaculate, ventral portions of limbs mottled around margins, palmar and plantar surfaces turned dark brown. + + + +Distribution + +This species is known from southern China, northern and central Vietnam and northern Laos (Frost 2020). This is the first record for Thailand, ca. 266 km southwest from the type locality in Jinghong City, Mengla County, Yunnan Province, China ( +Ye et al. 2007 +). + + + +Ecology + +Specimens were found between 19:00 to 21:00 h in small rocky streams (Fig. +5 +). Most specimens were found in the water. The surrounding habitat was secondary evergreen forest of medium growth. Other anuran species found in sympatry include: + +Limnonectes taylori + +, + +Kurixalus bisacculus + +(Taylor), +Leptobrachium cf. huashen +Fei & Ye, +Leptobrachella cf. minima +(Taylor) and + +Amolops cremnobatus + +Inger & Kottelat. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/82/49/378249DE570F59D586FAA0A548FCC134.xml b/data/37/82/49/378249DE570F59D586FAA0A548FCC134.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b987e422164 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/82/49/378249DE570F59D586FAA0A548FCC134.xml @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ + + + +The beetle fauna (Insecta, Coleoptera) of the Rawdhat Khorim National Park, Central Saudi Arabia + + + +Author + +Abdel-Dayem, Mahmoud S. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6276-1740 +King Saud University Museum of Arthropods (KSMA), Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2460 Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia +mseleem@ksu.edu.sa + + + +Author + +Fad, Hassan H. +Entomology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt + + + +Author + +El-Torkey, Ashraf M. +Plant Protection Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt + + + +Author + +Elgharbawy, Ali A. +King Saud University Museum of Arthropods (KSMA), Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2460 Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia & Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Al Azhar University, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt + + + +Author + +Aldryhim, Yousif N. +King Saud University Museum of Arthropods (KSMA), Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2460 Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia + + + +Author + +Kondratieff, Boris C. +Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1177, Fort Collins, Colorado, U. S. A. 80523 + + + +Author + +Ansi, Amin N. Al +King Saud University Museum of Arthropods (KSMA), Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2460 Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia + + + +Author + +Aldhafer, Hathal M. +King Saud University Museum of Arthropods (KSMA), Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2460 Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +2017-02-07 + + +653 + + +1 +78 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.653.10252 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.653.10252 +1313-2970-653-1 +8ECC0674017A48588BE8DDD05C0D7CF6 +FFE87C63852C5772725FBE55FF95902D +269679 + + + + +Aetheomorpha seminigra pumilio (Lacordaire 1848) + + + +World distribution. + +Africa +: ET, SD. +Asia +: AF, JO, OM, SA, YE. +North Africa +: EG. + + + +General distribution. +AFR_SAR. + + +Local distribution. + +AS, BA, JZ, MK ( +Medvedev 1993 +1996 +; +El-Hawagry et al. 2013 +). + + + +Collecting month and method. + +Very rare species, which was collected by BV on branches of + +Acacia gerrardii + +during V. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/82/F6/3782F63F2B7998748788DB2B84F0DDF5.xml b/data/37/82/F6/3782F63F2B7998748788DB2B84F0DDF5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1dd94d26bfd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/82/F6/3782F63F2B7998748788DB2B84F0DDF5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Salmo vimba +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + +S. pinna adiposa subserrata. + +It. Wgot. p. +231. Wimba. @/B. - - D. 12. P. 16. V. 10. A. 14. C. - - + + + + +Habitat in Waenero +Sveciae. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/84/15/378415211FA362BA6EF5570818230E35.xml b/data/37/84/15/378415211FA362BA6EF5570818230E35.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..14a608b75d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/84/15/378415211FA362BA6EF5570818230E35.xml @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ + + + +Richness, systematics, and distribution of molluscs associated with the macroalga Gigartina skottsbergii in the Strait of Magellan, Chile: A biogeographic affinity study + + + +Author + +Rosenfeld, Sebastian +Laboratorio de Macroalgas Antarticas y Subantarticas, Universidad de Magallanes, Casilla 113 - D, Punta Arenas, Chile & Instituto de Ecologia y Biodiversidad (IEB), Santiago + + + +Author + +Aldea, Cristian +Laboratorio de Ecologia y Medio Ambiente, Instituto de la Patagonia, Universidad de Magallanes & Programa GAIA-Antartica, Universidad de Magallanes +cristian.aldea@umag.cl + + + +Author + +Mansilla, Andres +Laboratorio de Macroalgas Antarticas y Subantarticas, Universidad de Magallanes, Casilla 113 - D, Punta Arenas, Chile & Instituto de Ecologia y Biodiversidad (IEB), Santiago & Parque Etnobotanico Omora, Sede Puerto Williams, Universidad de Magallanes + + + +Author + +Marambio, Johanna +Laboratorio de Macroalgas Antarticas y Subantarticas, Universidad de Magallanes, Casilla 113 - D, Punta Arenas, Chile + + + +Author + +Ojeda, Jaime +Laboratorio de Macroalgas Antarticas y Subantarticas, Universidad de Magallanes, Casilla 113 - D, Punta Arenas, Chile & Instituto de Ecologia y Biodiversidad (IEB), Santiago & Parque Etnobotanico Omora, Sede Puerto Williams, Universidad de Magallanes + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +2015-08-31 + + +519 + + +49 +100 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.519.9676 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.519.9676 +1313-2970-519-49 +E6F1CD8274AD4DE59806B00AADC4771B +FFCEFFC81C5BC028FF86FFA85720FF85 +579018 + + + + +Calliostoma modestulum (Strebel, 1908) +Fig. 5B + + + +Material examined. + +2 spm (13 +x +11 - 15 +x +13 mm +). + + + +Synonymy. + + +Calliostoma modestulum + +(Strebel, 1908): 70, pl. I, figs. 13a-b; +Melvill and Standen 1912 +: 347. +Carcelles and Williamson 1951 +: 263, +Castellanos and Landoni 1989 +: 8, pl. I, fig. 8. + + + +Calliostoma modestula + +, + +Castellanos and +Fernandez +1976 + +: 141, pl. II, figs. 8-9. + + + +Remarks. + +From a morphological point of view, +Melvill and Standen (1912) +commented that this species presents similarities to + +Photinula crawshayi + +(Smith, 1905), although it has more globular whorls. The maximum depth at which it has been recorded is 869 m. However, in this study, a shallower depth was recorded, with specimens found at 10 m in beds of + +Gigartina skottsbergii + +. + + + + +Distribution +. + + +Magellanic: Strait of Magellan: Punta Santa Ana (this record) and western entrance of the Strait of Magellan ( +USNM 2010 +); Cockburn Channel ( +Powell 1951 +); from Chubut ( + +Castellanos and +Fernandez +1976 + +), Malvinas/Falkland Islands ( +Strebel 1908 +, +Powell 1951 +, + +Castellanos and +Fernandez +1976 + +), and Burdwood Bank ( +Melvill and Standen 1912 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/84/88/3784884BCA6E67F4B7025B3FF93514FA.xml b/data/37/84/88/3784884BCA6E67F4B7025B3FF93514FA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d23e4e518f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/84/88/3784884BCA6E67F4B7025B3FF93514FA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Phygadeuon hercynicus Gravenhorst, 1829 + + + +Distribution +England + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/84/D2/3784D255E606B5C019B6C3603775D8B1.xml b/data/37/84/D2/3784D255E606B5C019B6C3603775D8B1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f43849b12c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/84/D2/3784D255E606B5C019B6C3603775D8B1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ + + + +Trichopolydesmidae from Cameroon, 1: The genus Hemisphaeroparia Schubart, 1955. With a genus-level reclassification of Afrotropical genera of the family (Diplopoda, Polydesmida) + + + +Author + +Golovatch, S. I. + + + +Author + +Fiemapong, A. R. Nzoko + + + +Author + +Tamesse, J. L. + + + +Author + +Mauries, J. - P. + + + +Author + +VandenSpiegel, D. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2018 + +785 + + +49 +98 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.785.27422 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.785.27422 +1313-2970-785-49 +03935A66FA344DEBBEEA00EC88094062 +03935A66FA344DEBBEEA00EC88094062 + + + + + +Hemisphaeroparia +ongot + +sp. n. +Figs 9, 10, 28D + + + + +Type +material. + + +Holotype ♂ (MRAC 22748), Cameroon, Ongot Forest, +03°51'N +, +011°25'E +, ca. 810 m a.s.l., 26.III.2014, leg. A.R. Nzoko Fiemapong. + +Paratypes: 1 ♂ (SEM, MRAC 22749), same locality, 27.IX.2014, leg. A.R. Nzoko Fiemapong; 1 ♀ (MRAC 22750), same locality, together with holotype. + + +Diagnosis. + +Differs from all other species of the genus by the presence of a boletiform epicranial tubercle (♂), coupled with the caudal corner of paraterga becoming increasingly strongly drawn behind the rear tergal margin starting with segment 13 and the gonopodal telopodites that are deeply sunken inside a large gonocoel and show three main branches (ab, mb, bb), all well-exposed and followed +by +no lobe, as well as a short solenomere with a tooth (t) at base of both sl and ab (Figure 10). + + + +Name. +To emphasize the type locality; noun in apposition. + + +Description. +Length of holotype ca. 5.5 mm (♂), width of midbody pro- and metazonae 0.45 and 0.6 mm (♂), respectively. Length of paratypes (♀) 5.5 mm, width of midbody pro- and metazonae 0.55-0.7 mm (♂), respectively. Coloration in alcohol nearly pallid to very light yellow (Figure 28D). + +All other characters as in +H. zamakoe +sp. n., except as follows. + + +Caudal corner of paraterga always rounded, drawn increasingly back, but reaching beyond rear tergal margin on segments 13-18 (Figure 9 +A-C +). + +Gonopodal telopodite (Figure 10) deeply sunken inside a deep gonocoel, densely setose at base with three main branches (ab, mb, bb) mostly exposed: bb the shortest and rounded on top, mb slightly curved and subtruncate, and ab the longest and also slightly curved. Seminal groove relatively long, ending on a short solenomere (sl) supplied with an evident tooth (t) at base of sl and ab. + + +Figure 9. +Hemisphaeroparia ongot +sp. n., SEM micrographs of ♂ paratype A, D, H anterior part of body, lateral, dorsal and ventral views, respectively B, E, I midbody segments, lateral, dorsal and ventral views, respectively C, F, J posterior part of body, lateral, dorsal and ventral views, respectively G midbody segment, caudal view K tergal seta, lateral view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm ( +A-C +), 0.1 mm ( +D-J +), 0.01 mm (K). + + + + +Figure 10. +Hemisphaeroparia ongot +sp. n. A ♂ paratype, SEM micrographs of both gonopods in situ, caudoventral view B ♂ paratype, SEM micrographs of right gonopod, caudoventral view C, D left gonopod of holotype, mesal and lateral views, respectively. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A, C, D), 0.05 mm (B). Abbreviations: ab apical branch of telopodite, bb basal branch of telopodite, lo lobe, mb medial branch of telopodite, sl solenomere, t tooth. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/85/09/3785090FE06676529430E8521A3C1EA1.xml b/data/37/85/09/3785090FE06676529430E8521A3C1EA1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dad91f3576f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/85/09/3785090FE06676529430E8521A3C1EA1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ + + + +A catalogue of the ants of Paraguay (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). + + + +Author + +Wild, A. L. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2007 + +1622 + + +1 +55 + + + + +http://www.antbase.org/ants/publications/21367/21367.pdf + +journal article +21367 + + + + +heeri Forel +1874. + + + + +Canindeyu +, Central (ALWC, BMNH, LACM, MHNG). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/85/2A/37852A492D309FE57A837209E8E36A36.xml b/data/37/85/2A/37852A492D309FE57A837209E8E36A36.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..68c6ef0310a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/85/2A/37852A492D309FE57A837209E8E36A36.xml @@ -0,0 +1,193 @@ + + + +Phylogenetic and morphological studies in Xylodon (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) with the addition of four new species + + + +Author + +Riebesehl, Janett + + + +Author + +Yurchenko, Eugene + + + +Author + +Nakasone, Karen K. + + + +Author + +Langer, Ewald + +text + + +MycoKeys + + +2019 + +47 + + +97 +137 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.47.31130 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.47.31130 +1314-4049-47-97 + + + + +Xylodon filicinus Yurchenko & Riebesehl +sp. nov. +Figs 3b, 5 + + + +Holotype. + +TAIWAN, Nantou Co., Xitou (Shitou) Forest Recreation Area, W slope of Phoenix Mt. Range, 1470 m a.s.l., +23°40'N +, +120°48'E +, old-growth sparse broadleaf forest, on dead detached rachis of +Cyathea +sp., leg. E. Yurchenko, 31 Jul 2011 (field No. 38; MSK-F 12869; isotype in KAS). + + + +Description. + +Basidiomata effused, white, 2-4 cm in extent, farinaceous or pruinose, very loose or discontinuous, odontioid, 30-55 +μm +thick between aculei. Margin thinning out. Aculei conical or subcylindrical, 40-80 +μm +long, 15-45 +μm +diam., peg-like, of loose texture, 8-14/mm. Hyphal system monomitic, hyphae colourless, clamped at all septa. Subicular hyphae in a loose tissue, rarely branched, 2-3 +μm +diam., thin- or slightly thick-walled, loosely encrusted, under the subhymenium with inflations 5-6.5 +μm +wide. The largest crystals in subiculum 6-8 +μm +across, aggregated in clusters 15-18 +μm +diam. Subhymenial hyphae moderately branched, partly short-celled and slightly inflated, 2 +-3.5(- +4) +μm +diam., lightly encrusted. Projecting hyphae in aculei richly encrusted, 20-45 +x +5-7 +μm +in encrusted part, with clamped and simple septa, basally thick-walled, then becoming thin-walled, obtuse, sometimes subacute at apex. Cystidia in hymenium thin-walled, lightly encrusted, of three types: (1) subcylindrical, often slightly tapered to apex, numerous, 20-35 +x +4.5-5.5 +μm +; (2) capitate, rare, 26-32 +μm +long, 3-5 +μm +wide at base, 2.5-3 +μm +wide at apex; (3) hyphoid to narrowly ventricose, about 30 +x +4.5 +μm +. Basidioles ellipsoid, ovoid, clavate, 7.5-18 +x +4.5-7.5 +μm +, more or less encrusted. Basidia utriform, (14 +-)16- +20 +x +(3.5 +-)4.5- +5.5 +μm +, thin-walled, smooth or sparsely encrusted, with four sterigmata 2-6.5 +x +1-1.5 +μm +. Spores globose to subglobose, 4 +-5(- +5.5) +x +(3.7 +-)4- +4.5 +μm +, holotype L = 4.7 +µm +, W = 4.1 +µm +, Q = 1.1-1.2, thin-walled, often with one large oil-like globule, negative in Mz, weakly cyanophilous, with minute apiculus. + + + +Figure 5. Micromorphology of +Xylodon filicinus +(MSK-F 12369, holotype): A vertical section through basidioma B subicular hyphae C inflations on hyphae in lower subhymenium D crystals from subiculum E portions of hymenium and subhymenium F bundle of encrusted projecting hyphae G separate projecting hyphae H subcylindrical cystidia J capitate cystidia K hyphoid cystidium L basidioles M basidia N basidiospores. Scale bars: 100 +μm +(A); 10 +μm +( +B-M +); 5 +μm +(N). + + + + +Distribution and ecology. +From the lower mountainous belt in Taiwan, on dead fern rachises. + + +Etymology. +from Latin filix ‒ fern, refers to the occurrence on dead fern rachises. +Additional specimen examined. TAIWAN, the same locality and the same substrate as holotype, leg. E. Yurchenko, 31 Jul 2011 (field No. 18; MSK-F 12870; dup. in KAS). + + +Remarks. + +The distinctive features of this species are the pruinose, minutely odontioid basidiomata, fascicles of richly encrusted projecting hyphae in aculei and the three types of cystidia. +Xylodon filicinus +is morphologically similar to +X. hyphodontinus +, which differs in having projecting hyphae in the aculei that are straighter with more septa, a denser subhymenium composed of short-celled hyphae, short, ventricose cystidioles and spore walls that are slightly thickened at maturity (see Fig. 6). + + + +Figure 6. Micromorphology of +Xylodon hyphodontinus +. LIP GG-MAR 15-127: A vertical section through basidioma B subicular hyphae C excerpt of tramal hyphae to hymenium and projecting hyphae D bundle of encrusted aculeal hyphae E encrustation on projecting hypha in water F encrustation on projecting hyphae in 3% KOHG naked projecting hyphal end H variously shaped hyphal ends J capitate cystidia K portion of hymenium and subhymenium L basidioles and cystidioles M basidiospores. LIP GG-MAR 12-238: N basidia. Scale bars: 100 +μm +(A); 10 +μm +( +B-L +, N); 5 +μm +(M). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/86/2B/37862B14B648DE422E3499741E53A101.xml b/data/37/86/2B/37862B14B648DE422E3499741E53A101.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..77b8a164fc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/86/2B/37862B14B648DE422E3499741E53A101.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +Order Chiroptera - Family Pteropodidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +313 +350 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Megaerops wetmorei +subsp. +wetmorei +Taylor 1934 + + + + + + + +Megaerops wetmorei +subsp. +wetmorei +Taylor 1934 + +, + +Monogr. Bur. Sci. +Manila +: 191 + + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +Philippines +, Mindanao Isl, +Cotabato +near Tatayan. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/87/3B/37873BD9896885743163E3FD9FA67D0A.xml b/data/37/87/3B/37873BD9896885743163E3FD9FA67D0A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e8435cb8953 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/87/3B/37873BD9896885743163E3FD9FA67D0A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of the types of Triphoridae (Mollusca, Gastropoda) in the Museum fuer Naturkunde, Berlin, with lectotype designations + + + +Author + +Albano, Paolo G. + + + +Author + +Bakker, Piet A. J. + +text + + +Zoosystematics and Evolution + + +2016 + +92 + + +1 + + +33 +78 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.5936 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.5936 +1860-0743-1-33 +71689C6BD5AB48CB87858B43999F6379 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Caenogastropoda Triphoridae + + + +Triphora plebeja Thiele, 1925 +Figure 10 + + + + +Triphora plebeja +Thiele, 1925: 129 (95), plate XXII (X), figure 21. + + + +Type specimens. +Lectotype: ZMB/Moll no. 109272a from Station 100, here designated. Paralectotype A: ZMB/Moll no. 109272b from Station 100; Paralectotype B: ZMB/Moll no. 109272c from Station 101; Paralectotype C: ZMB/Moll no. 109272d from Station 106. + + +Type locality. +"Stationen 100 (Francis-Bucht), 101 (Algoa-Bucht) und 106 (Agulhasbank)" (South Africa). + + +Original description. + +Schalen von den Stationen 100 (Francis-Bucht), 101 (Algoa-Bucht) und 106 (Agulhasbank) unterscheiden sich von den bisher genannten Arten durch ihre spitze, aus 5 Windungen bestehende Embryonalschale mit einer aus herablaufenden +Faeden +und 2 Spiralreifen bestehenden Skulptur, sie sind braun, lang +kegelfoermig +, im ganzen mit 11 Windungen, von denen die auf die Embryonalschale folgenden 2, die +uebrigen +3 Reihen von Knoten aufweisen; die letzten werden kaum breiter, bei ihnen ist ein schmaler Reifen +ueber +der Naht sichtbar. +Ausser +diesem, der die untere Kante bildet, hat die letzte Windung noch 3 glatte Reifen an der Unterseite. Spindelfortsatz und Mundrand sind +beschaedigt +. +Hoehe +4,5 mm, Durchmesser 1,25 mm. + + + +Translation. +Shells from station 100 (Francis Bay), 101 (Algoa Bay) and 106 (Agulhas Bank) are distinguishable from all the previous species by their pointy protoconch, composed of 5 embryonal whorls with two spiral keels and axial riblets; the shells are brown, long and conical, in total 11 whorls, of which the first whorls after the embryonal whorls have two rows of tubercles and the lower whorls 3 rows, the last one is barely wider, above the suture a smaller cord is visible. The base has further three smooth cords visible. Siphonal canal and aperture are damaged. Height 4.5 mm, diameter 1.25 mm. + + +Diagnosis. +Lectotype height 4.5 mm. Shell conical, with flat whorls. Teleoconch of nine whorls, which have three tubercled broad spiral cords; the second one appears lately, on the fifth whorl. A fine suprasutural smooth cord is also present. The last whorl has a fourth smooth spiral cord, and the base has further three smooth spiral cords. The peristome of the lectotype has been rebuilt after breaking (there is a scar, likely due to a predatory attempt), hence it is not fully reliable. Nonetheless, the sculpture of the peristome seems not to bear bifurcating ribs. Multispiral apex of five whorls; a bit worn in the lectotype; nonetheless, it clearly bears two keels and fine axial riblets on the lower three whorls. Colour light brown, the first tubercled cord looks lighter, but colours may be faded, because the specimens were dead collected. + + +Remarks. +This is the only species with planktotrophic apex described by Thiele from South Africa. + + +Figure 10. +Triphora plebeja +Thiele, 1925, Station 100 (Francis Bay). A-D, F-H. Lectotype. ZMB/Moll no. 109272a: front (A-B), side (C), back (D), protoconch (F-G), peristome (H). E. Original figure in +Thiele 1925 +. I. Original label. Scale bar: A-D: 1 mm, F-G: 0.2 mm, H: 0.5 mm. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/87/B7/3787B7C8DF56107B5B01B42216A10EB8.xml b/data/37/87/B7/3787B7C8DF56107B5B01B42216A10EB8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6b87527b6b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/87/B7/3787B7C8DF56107B5B01B42216A10EB8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,186 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Asteraceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +1074 +1250 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Senecio doronicum +(L.) L. + + + + + +Artbeschreibung: +20-50 cm +hoch, +zerstreut bis dicht flockig-filzig +. +Blaetter +laenglich-eifoermig +bis lanzettlich, buchtig +gezaehnt +, untere in einen Stiel +verschmaelert +, obere sitzend, + +wechselstaendig + +. +Bluetenkoepfe +meist 1-5, Durchmesser +3,5-6 cm +, mit 10-20 strahlig + +ausgebreiteten, gold- bis orangegelben +Zungenblueten +und gelben +Roehrenblueten + +. +Fruechte +5-6 mm +lang, mit +7-10 mm +langem, weissem Pappus. + + + + +Bluetezeit +: 7-8 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz: Steinige Rasen, felsige +Haenge +, kalkliebend / subalpin-alpin / A, JS ( +Dole +) + + + + +Verbreitung global: Mittel- und +suedeuropaeisch + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl FfrischLichtzahl LhellSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rneutral bis basisch (pH 5.5-8.5)Temperaturzahl T +unter-alpin, supra-subalpin und ober-subalpin ( +Arven-Laerchenwaelder +) +
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +naehrstoffarm + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subkontinental (niedrige relative Luftfeuchtigkeit, grosse Temperaturschwankungen, eher kalte Winter)
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: + +Gaemswurz-Greiskraut + +, + +Gaemswurz-Kreuzkraut + +Nom +francais +: + +Senecon +doronic + +Nome italiano: +Senecione mezzano + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/88/33/378833C2505687F17E3D789774DE2286.xml b/data/37/88/33/378833C2505687F17E3D789774DE2286.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d26318718b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/88/33/378833C2505687F17E3D789774DE2286.xml @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ + + + +Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 2. Nymphaceae bis Primulaceae (2 nd edition) (p. 956): Primulaceae + + + +Author + +Hess, Hans Ernst + + + +Author + +Landolt, Elias + + + +Author + +Hirzel, Rosmarie + +text + +1976 +Birkhaeuser Verlag + + +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.292251 + +book +292251 +10.5281/zenodo.292251 +3-7643-0527-4 + + + +<subSubSection id="E5DE0371190ABC0403E81965C8AB0208" pageId="null" pageNumber="928" type="nomenclature"> +<paragraph id="13C94ED24861B36BFF9AA06D05C1C341" pageId="null" pageNumber="928"> +<taxonomicName id="3F7DA2259215AC74B6CC48BE65AA887B" authority="Wulfen" class="Magnoliopsida" family="Primulaceae" genus="Primula" kingdom="Plantae" order="Ericales" pageId="null" pageNumber="928" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="glutinosa"> +Primula +<normalizedToken id="4964D30BD122B1C9D8E473A2D8ACFEB6" originalValue="glutinósa" pageId="null" pageNumber="928">glutinosa</normalizedToken> +Wulfen +</taxonomicName> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="7241EA883690194BC204C78FB8A98A98" pageId="null" pageNumber="928" type="vernacular_names"> +<paragraph id="CC365402CC7BEA29BBCACAD4A0A2F350" pageId="null" pageNumber="928"> +Klebrige +<normalizedToken id="EEF55C7965CC7F0A326AACBC1E610254" originalValue="Schlüsselblume" pageId="null" pageNumber="928">Schluesselblume</normalizedToken> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> + + + +Blaetter +bis 6 cm lang und +0,7 cm breit +, +allmaehlich +in den breit +gefluegelten +, kurzen Stiel +verschmaelert +, ober- und unterseits +dunkelgruen +, scheinbar kahl (kaum 0,05 mm lange +Druesenhaare +), klebrig, gegen die Spitze zu fein und spitz +gezaehnt +, selten ganzrandig, in der Knospenlage gegen die Oberseite eingerollt. Stengel 2-7 cm hoch, kahl, klebrig, mit 2-7 +bluetiger +, aufrechter Dolde. +Tragblaetter +, +Bluetenstiele +und Kelch scheinbar kahl, klebrig. + +Tragblaetter +oval, 7-11 mm lang und + +1/2 +- ⅔ +so breit +, meist braunrot. +Bluetenstiele +0,5-2 mm lang. Kelch 5-8 mm lang, etwa so lang wie die +Kronroehre +, nicht kantig, unterhalb der +Zaehne +3-5 mm im Durchmesser; +Kelchzaehne +2-3 mm lang, gerundet, 1- +11/2 +mal so lang wie breit. + +Krone dunkelblau, +spaeter +violett, am Schlundeingang mit dunklem Ring + +, kaum duftend, mit weit +trichterfoermig +ausgebreiteten, 4-7 mm langen, tief ausgerandeten Kronzipfeln. Frucht 4-6 mm lang, 1-2mal so lang wie dick, etwas +kuerzer +als der Kelch. - +Bluete +; +Spaeter +Sommer. + + +Zytologische Angaben. 2n += +66: +Material aus botanischem Garten und aus den Dolomiten (bei einer Pflanze wurde auch 2n = 67 +gezaehlt +) (Kress 1963). + + +Standort. +Alpin. Humose, feinerdereiche, kalkarme, ziemlich saure, im Winter schneebedeckte +Boeden +. Rasen, Ruhschutt. +Caricetum curvulae +(Kerner) Brockmann-Jerosch 1907. + + +Verbreitung. Ostalpen-Pflanze: +Graubuenden +bis +Kaernten +und Steiermark. - Im Gebiet: +Graubuenden +(Aroser Rothorngruppe, +suedliches +Unterengadin, +Muenstertal +), Gebiet +oestlich +von Bormio, oberes Val Camonica, Val di Scalve, Ortler- und Adamellogebiet, Vintschgau, Oberinntal, Vorarlberg (St. +Antoenier +Joch); selten. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/88/48/378848DB865EA4AEBB67D9A04F8D090D.xml b/data/37/88/48/378848DB865EA4AEBB67D9A04F8D090D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..924ad9e7aa1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/88/48/378848DB865EA4AEBB67D9A04F8D090D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Tribe +Rhyncolini Gistel, 1848 + + + + +Rhynchalidae +Gistel, 1848: [6] [stem: Rhyncol-]. Type genus: +Rhyncolus +Germar, 1817 [as +Rhyncholus +, incorrect subsequent spelling of type genus name, not in prevailing usage; +Rhyncolus +Germar, 1817 placed on the Official List of Generic Names in Zoology (ICZN 1991b)]. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/89/04/37890425D08B5B47B6E67408B5226FBA.xml b/data/37/89/04/37890425D08B5B47B6E67408B5226FBA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..225f5669ce4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/89/04/37890425D08B5B47B6E67408B5226FBA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,288 @@ + + + +Hymenasplenium tholiformis (Aspleniaceae), a new fern species from southeastern Xizang, China based on morphological and molecular evidence + + + +Author + +Qiu, Yong-Lin +School of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, China + + + +Author + +Xu, Ke-Wang +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2239-0487 +Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China & Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Subtropical Forest Biodiversity Conservation, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China + + + +Author + +Ju, Wen-Bin +Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration Biodiversity Conservation, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, China + + + +Author + +Zhao, Wang-Lin +College of Science, Tibet University, Lhasa, 850000, China & Motuo Observation and Research Center for Earth Landscape and Earth System, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Linzhi 860712, China + + + +Author + +Zhang, Liang +CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Kunming, 650201, China +zhangliang@mail.kib.ac.cn + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2022 + +2022-08-05 + + +204 + + +43 +56 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.204.85746 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.204.85746 +1314-2003-204-43 +7BA52765F2905764AB267DA1E1F85BCB + + + + +Hymenasplenium tholiformis Liang Zhang, W.B. Ju & K.W. Xu +sp. nov. + + + + +Type +. + + + +China +. +Xizang +: +Medog County +, +Beibeng Xiang +, +Xirang +, ca. + +600 m + +from the +Yarlung Zangbo River +, +29°11'17.63"N +, +95°03'42.27"E +, + +720 m + +elev., +28 Oct 2021 +, + +Liang Zhang +& +Wen-Bin Ju +4781 + +( +holotype +: KUN1543824!; isotypes: CDBI!, KUN!) + +. + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Hymenasplenium tholiformis + +is morphologically most similar to + +H. szechuanense + +, but different by having larger pinnae (middle pinnae 2.5-3 cm vs. 1.5-2.3 cm), extremely ascending upper pinnae (vs. spreading or slightly ascending), curved margins of acroscopic side of pinnae (vs. truncate), and pinna-marginal teeth entire and veins terminating just below marginal teeth (vs. pinna-marginal teeth retuse to emarginate and veins terminating just below these notches). + + + +Description. + +Plants perennial, 20-36 cm. Rhizome long-creeping, ca. 2 mm in diam., apex scaly; scales dark brown, lanceolate or narrowly triangular, 0.5-1 +x +0.2-0.3 mm, margins entire; roots yellowish brown when dried. Fronds remote, 10-12 mm apart, subglabrous; stipe shiny, black purple, 8-13 cm long, base ca. 2-3 mm in diam., with scales similar to those on rhizome; lamina herbaceous, once pinnate, narrowly oblong to lanceolate, 13-16 +x +3-5 cm, base truncate and slightly reduced, apex acuminate to caudate; rachis 0.5-1 mm in diam., wingless, narrowly grooved adaxially, shiny, glabrous, black purple to dark purple; pinnae 15-21 pairs, trapeziform to trapeziform-lunate, basal pinnae nearly opposite, spreading or slightly ascending, upper pinnae alternate, extremely ascending, middle pinnae alternate, ascending, 2.5-3 +x +0.6-1 cm, dimidiate, pinna asymmetrical, base largest, upper part of pinna enlarged, similar width as, or slightly wider than, the middle part of pinna, apex obtuse to rounded, acroscopic margins curved and irregularly toothed, teeth entire, basiscopic margins truncate or slightly curved and entire (Fig. +1 +). Veins visible on both sides of pinnae, free, forking and terminating in marginal teeth, 3-4 basal basiscopic veins lacking. Sori medial, linear or semi-elliptic, 5-8 pairs per pinna (Fig. +1 +), 2-3 mm long; indusia persistent, brown, linear or semi-elliptic, membranous, entire, opening toward costa. Spores elliptic to reniform, perispore fimbriate-alate, 43-47 +μm +in diam. (Fig. +1 +); 32 spores per sporangium. + + + +Figure 1. + +Hymenasplenium tholiformis + +sp. nov. +A +habit +B +crozier +C +adaxial lamina +D +abaxial lamina +E +adaxial pinnae +F +abaxial pinnae, showing sori +G +rhizome scales +H +spore surface +I +spores. Photos credit: +A-F +by L. Zhang; +G-I +by W.-Z. Ma & Y.-L. Qiu. + + + + +Distribution and conservation assessment. + + +Hymenasplenium tholiformis + +is endemic to Medog County. Currently, only one large population with ca. 35 individuals was found. According to IUCN Red List criteria B2a or D ( +IUCN 2022 +), this species should be listed as critically endangered (CR). More extensive fieldwork at low elevations in nearby mountains will be needed to accurately assess its conservation status. + + + +Figure 2. +Maximum likelihood phylogeny of + +Hymenasplenium + +based on five plastid markers ( +atpB +, +psbA +, +rbcL +, +rps4 +& +rps4-trnS +, and +trnL +& +trnL-F +). The numbers associated with branches are maximum likelihood bootstrap support (MLBS) and Bayesian posterior probability (BIPP). The asterisk indicates MLBS = 100, BIPP = 1.00. The subclades are indicated following +Xu et al. (2018b) +. + + + + +Ecology. + + +Hymenasplenium tholiformis + +was observed in a shady place at the bottom of a large rock in the disturbed forest, at an elevation of 720 m, ca. 600 m from the Yarlung Zangbo River. High humidity and cool conditions are important for the growth of the new species. + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet alludes to dome shape of pinna apex. + + +Vernacular name. +yuan ding mo ye tie jiao jue (圆顶膜叶铁角蕨; Chinese name). + + +Comments. + +In Medog County, ferns are highly diverse along the Yarlung Zangbo River and its tributaries. In this region, at elevations between 650 m and 4500 m, we have discovered four species in three subclades of + +Hymenasplenium + +, including + +H. cheilosorum + +(Kunze ex Mett.) Tagawa in the + +H. cheilosorum + +subclade, + +H. obliquissimum + +(Hayata) Sugim. in the + +H. obliquissimum + +subclade, and + +H. excisum + +and + +H. tholiformis + +in the + +H. excisum + +subclade. Of the four species, + +H. tholiformis + +is distributed at the lowest elevation, while + +H. obliquissimum + +is at the highest elevation between 2100 m to 2250 m. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/89/64/378964B52EF55415AFD7A160D17E65D4.xml b/data/37/89/64/378964B52EF55415AFD7A160D17E65D4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1e04a398d58 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/89/64/378964B52EF55415AFD7A160D17E65D4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part R) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +785 +805 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Ranunculus lingua +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +1 + +: 549. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Europae borealioris fossis, aquis limosis." RCN: 4062. + + + + +Lectotype +(Iranshahr & al. in Rechinger, +Fl. Iranica +171: 169. 1992): Herb. Linn. No. 715.3 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + +Ranunculus lingua +L. + +( +Ranunculaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/89/FD/3789FD2AC6DB0BDAEF5BAD1F83E11A95.xml b/data/37/89/FD/3789FD2AC6DB0BDAEF5BAD1F83E11A95.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8c38a862562 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/89/FD/3789FD2AC6DB0BDAEF5BAD1F83E11A95.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Sciuridae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +754 +818 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + + +Sundasciurus (Sundasciurus) lowii +subsp. +lowii +Thomas 1892 + + + + + + + +Sundasciurus (Sundasciurus) lowii +subsp. +lowii +Thomas 1892 + +, +Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 6, 2: 253 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +"Lumbidan, on the mainland opposite +Labuan +" [ +Sarawak +, +Malaysia +]. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8A/52/378A526FEB78BD0DB3D48206766C3C43.xml b/data/37/8A/52/378A526FEB78BD0DB3D48206766C3C43.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c8a1d9ce57a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8A/52/378A526FEB78BD0DB3D48206766C3C43.xml @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + +Bellisotoma, a new genus of Isotomidae from North America (Hexapoda, Collembola) + + + +Author + +Soto-Adames, Felipe N. + + + +Author + +Giordano, Rosanna + + + +Author + +Christiansen, Kenneth + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +283 + + +7 +13 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.283.3277 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.283.3277 +1313-2970-283-7 + + + + +Bellisotoma joycei (Soto-Adames & Giordano), 2011 +comb. n. + + + +Material examined. + +Holotype (Illinois Natural History Survey [INHS] Insect Collection accession number 551,608) and 3 paratypes (INHS Insect Collection accession numbers 551, 610; 551,611; 551, 621): USA,Vermont, Grand Isle Co., South Hero, +White's +Beach, N44.62189, W73.32273, sand and thick layer of aquatic plant debris, October 2005. 2 paratypes (INHS Insect Collection accession numbers 551,609 and 551,612): Vermont, Grand Isle Co., Grand Isle, Pearl Bay, west of intersection of East Shore North Rd. and Hide Point West Rd., N44.73078 W73.26401, sand with sparse remains of aquatic plant debris, October 2005. CANADA, Quebec, 9115 (1994), St. Jude, sugar maple leaf litter near N45.78333, W72.93334, Berlese MO-SJ-2, identified as +Proisotoma (Ballistura) ewingi +on the label (this slide contains 7 specimens and is deposited in the A.J. Cook Arthropod Research Collection at Michigan State University). + + + +Remarks. + +The specimens from Quebec were originally identified as +Ballistura ewingi +, but in the key character that separate +Ballistura joycei +from +Ballistura ewingi +(number of distal setae on the collophore) they are identical to +Ballistura joycei +. All specimens from Quebec are small, the largest measuring only 0.78 mm. Two of the seven individuals from Canada are males. In the largest male the genital plate is well developed, but it appears to be closed, and neither males has modified metatibiotarsal setae. These males are either subadults of adults in reproductive quiescence. + + +In the specimens from Vermont the number and size of eyes varies, and one individual is blind (Soto-Adames and Giordano, 2011). In the individuals from Quebec +the +number of eyes is constant, except for one specimen in which eye G is missing on one side of the head. Dorsal views of the prelabral region suggest the presence of 4 prelabral setae (Fig. 6), but a lateral view of the head (Fig. 5) clearly shows that the outer setae are displaced posteriorly, away from the labral suture, and are not prelabral in the usual sense. One individual from Quebec has only one prelabral seta. The number of microsensilla is somewhat variable. Most individuals have 10//10100 microsensilla, but one specimen from Vermont has one microsensillum on the metathorax, and the two males from Quebec have 2 microsensilla on the first abdominal segment. + +The shape of the tenent hairs is difficult to ascertain in the specimens from Canada. In the two smallest individuals (0.69 mm) all tenent hairs seem acuminate, whereas in the larger specimens there are 111 capitate and 011 acuminate tenent hairs. Most individuals have 3 tenacular teeth, but two have 3+4 and one has 2+3. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8A/83/378A836B0CB959B9AD811E45C62BCA17.xml b/data/37/8A/83/378A836B0CB959B9AD811E45C62BCA17.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..42968e59fcd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8A/83/378A836B0CB959B9AD811E45C62BCA17.xml @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@ + + + +New records for the Western Balkans cranefly fauna (Diptera, Tipuloidea) with the description of a new Baeoura Alexander (Diptera, Limoniidae) + + + +Author + +Kolcsar, Levente-Peter +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7784-2386 +Center for Marine Environmental Studies, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790 - 8577, Japan +kolcsar.peter@gmail.com + + + +Author + +d'Oliveira, Micha Camiel +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Darwinweg 2, 2333, CR Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Graf, Wolfram +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6559-0644 +Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria + + + +Author + +Quindroit, Clovis +Groupe d'etudes des Invertebres Armoricains, Angers, France + + + +Author + +Watanabe, Kozo +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7062-595X +Center for Marine Environmental Studies, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790 - 8577, Japan + + + +Author + +Ivkovic, Marija +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-5676 +Division of Zoology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia +marija.ivkovic@biol.pmf.hr + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2023 + +2023-03-31 + + +1157 + + +1 +42 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1157.98997 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1157.98997 +1313-2970-1157-1 +1685D6479DDD45FEB0AC70AE8CF295AA +71841F4342ED579DACC2C259FBF14503 + + + + +35. +Lipsothrix remota (Walker, 1848) + + + +Material examined. + + + +Croatia + +• +1 male +; + +Licko-Senjska +county + +, + +Koncarev +Kraj + +, +Spring of Bijela +rijeka, +Plitvice Lakes +; +44.83472°N +, +15.56194°E +; alt. + +720 m + +; +30 June 2021 +; +emergence trap +, P5; leg. + +M. +Ivkovic + +; UZC + +• + +1 male +; + +Licko-Senjska +county + +, + +Plitvicki +Ljeskovac + +, +Spring of Crna +rijeka, +Plitvice Lakes +; +44.83714°N +, +15.60752°E +; alt. + +680 m + +; +30 June 2021 +; +emergence trap +, P6 + +• + +1 female +; same locality; +29 September 2021 +; +emergence trap +, P5; leg. + +M. +Ivkovic + +; CKLP + +• + +1 male +; + +Licko-Senjska +county + +, + +Plitvicki +Ljeskovac + +, +Tufa +barrier +Labudovac +, +Plitvice Lakes +; +44.87138°N +, +15.59972°E +; alt. + +630 m + +; +30 June 2014 +; +emergence trap +, P4 + +• + +1 male +; same locality; +30 June 2015 +; +emergence trap +, P6; leg. + +M. +Ivkovic + +; CKLP + +. + + + +Comments. + +A common European species with similar habitat reference as + +Lipsothrix nobilis + +( +Hancock et al. 2009 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8A/EB/378AEBA565A1674B1601696617523E1D.xml b/data/37/8A/EB/378AEBA565A1674B1601696617523E1D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7b2c53f184 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8A/EB/378AEBA565A1674B1601696617523E1D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +Birds from the Azores: An updated list with some comments on species distribution + + + +Author + +Barcelos, Luis MD + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Pedro R + + + +Author + +Bried, Joel + + + +Author + +Mendonca, Enesima P + + + +Author + +Gabriel, Rosalina + + + +Author + +Borges, Paulo Alexandre Vieira + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +6604 +6604 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6604 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6604 +1314-2828--6604 + + + + +Coturnix coturnix conturbans Hartert, 1917 + + + +Ecological interactions + +Native status +Palearctic + + +Conservation status +A-IIB + + + +Distribution +COR (Breeder); FLO (Breeder); FAI (Breeder); PIC (Breeder); GRA (Breeder); SJG (Breeder); TER (Breeder); SMG (Breeder); SMR (Breeder) + + +Notes + +Native. +Rodrigues et al. (2010) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8B/69/378B6906FDA8E98033A10EF512A430E6.xml b/data/37/8B/69/378B6906FDA8E98033A10EF512A430E6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b86a417d339 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8B/69/378B6906FDA8E98033A10EF512A430E6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ + + + +Checklist of Fishes from Madagascar Reef, Campeche Bank, Mexico + + + +Author + +Zarco Perello, Salvador + + + +Author + +Moreno Mendoza, Rigoberto + + + +Author + +Simoes, Nuno + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1100 +1100 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1100 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1100 +1314-2828--1100 + + + + +Sparisoma rubripinne (Valenciennes, 1840) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +CIRR-308 +; recordedBy: +Salvador Zarco Perello +; individualCount: +6 +; Location: continent: America; country: +Mexico +; stateProvince: Yucatan; locality: +Madagascar Reef +; verbatimDepth: 5 m; verbatimLatitude: 782271.440297; verbatimLongitude: 2373268.56034; verbatimCoordinateSystem: UTM 15N; verbatimSRS: WGS84; decimalLatitude: +21.439732 +; decimalLongitude: +-90.276691 +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Photosampling +; eventDate: +8/10/2007 +; Record Level: collectionID: YUC-PEC_239-01-64; institutionCode: +UMDI-SISAL +; collectionCode: +CIRR + + + + +Distribution +Western Atlantic. Massachusetts to Brazil. Including Bermuda, Bahamas, and throughout the Caribbean Islands. Also reported in the eastern Atlantic off west Africa. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8B/A0/378BA01FEAD0BEBB5554A2A1F5F404D6.xml b/data/37/8B/A0/378BA01FEAD0BEBB5554A2A1F5F404D6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..05cce2d49c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8B/A0/378BA01FEAD0BEBB5554A2A1F5F404D6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ + + + +North-Western Palaearctic species of Pristiphora (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae) + + + +Author + +Prous, Marko + + + +Author + +Kramp, Katja + + + +Author + +Liston 1, Veli VikbergAndrew + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2017 + +59 + + +1 +190 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.59.12565 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.59.12565 +1314-2607-59-1 +598C5BB321364D91B522FA14D8874A52 + + + + +Pristiphora staudingeri (Ruthe, 1859) +Figs 202, 272 + + + + +Nematus +Staudingeri [sic!] Ruthe, 1859: 306-307. Lectotype ♀ (designated by +Vikberg 1978 +) in NMW, examined. Type locality: Iceland. + + +Pristiphora circularis +Kincaid, 1900: 350. Holotype ♀ (USNMENT00778165) in USNM, not examined. Type locality: Popof Island, Alaska, USA. Synonymised with +P. staudingeri +by +Smith (1979) +. + + +Pristiphora hyperborea +Malaise, 1921: 11. Lectotype ♀ (NHRS-HEVA000003650; designated by +Vikberg 1978 +) in NHRS, examined. Type locality: Torne +Traesk +, Torne Lappmark, Sweden. + + +Pristiphora asperlatus +Benson, 1935: 35-38. Holotype ♀ in BMNH, not examined. Type locality: Mount Braeriach, Inverness, Scotland, United Kingdom. Synonymised with +P. staudingeri +by +Lindqvist (1953) +. + + + +Similar species. + +The most similar species is +P. luteipes +, which can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from +P. staudingeri +: occasional specimens from arctic habitats have intermediate coloration of metafemur (between completely black and completely pale, e.g. specimen DEI-GISHym80238 has a nearly completely pale metafemur). See +Vikberg (2006) +and +Prous et al. (2016) +for more detailed discussion. + + + +Genetic data. + +Based on COI barcode sequences, +P. staudingeri +belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG3568) as +P. aphantoneura +, +P. bifida +, +P. confusa +, +P. opaca +, +P. pusilla +, and +P. subopaca +(Fig. 4). Maximum distance within the BIN is 3.33% and minimum between species distance is 0.00%. The nearest neighbour to BOLD:AAG3568, diverging by a minimum of 2.76%, is BOLD:AAQ2302 ( +P. armata +and +P. leucopus +). Based on nuclear data, maximum within species divergence is 0.7% (based on four specimens and TPI or both genes combined) and the nearest neighbour is 0.1% different ( +P. bifida +, +P. confusa +, +P. luteipes +, or +P. subopaca +, only TPI). + + + +Host plants. + +Salix herbacea +L. and +S. phylicifolia +L. ( +Vikberg 1978 +). + + + +Rearing notes. + +Ovipositing experiment no. 11/1974 as +P. hyperborea +: Finland, +Enontekioe +Lapland, Saana. On 21-22.VI.1974 one captured female laid 11 eggs into leaf-edge teeth of +Salix phylicifolia +. No eggs were laid on +Salix reticulata +, +Betula pubescens var. pumila +, +Astragalus alpinus +and +A. frigidus +. Larvae hatched on 25-26.VI.1974. They feed on the leaf margin. Four larval instars were observed. Their development was rapid and on 6.VII.1974 prepupae were found. No extra moult after feeding. + + + +Distribution and material examined. +West Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, France, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and United Kingdom. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8C/34/378C34FC905AA284E4E475AA1A29F6FC.xml b/data/37/8C/34/378C34FC905AA284E4E475AA1A29F6FC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..09c4512eb32 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8C/34/378C34FC905AA284E4E475AA1A29F6FC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ + + + +Description de nouveaux formicides éthiopiens (IIIme partie). + + + +Author + +Santschi, F. + +text + + +Revue de Zoologie Africaine + + +1926 + +13 + + +207 +267 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/3617/3617.pdf + +journal article +3617 + + + + +Crematogaster (Acrocoelia) sjostedti Mayr. st. bulawayensis +(Forel). + + + + +(— +Crematogaster buchneri st. africana v. bulawayensis Forel +, 1913, Ann. Soc. Ent. Belg. LVII, p. 125. [[ worker ]]. + + +— +Crematogaster vulcania st. godefreyi v. foraminicipoides Forel +, 1916, Rev. Suisse Zool. XXIV, p. 505, [[ worker ]]). + + + +J'ai compare un exemplaire type de cette derniere variete avec des cotypes du bylawayensis tous recus de Mr. Forel, il n'y a aucune differences entre les deux formes, qui sont de la meme localite. + + +Rhodesia: Bulawayo (Forel) — [[ worker ]] Types. — Arnold, Exemplaires un peu plus petits. +Tanganika: Duthumi (Loveridge, 18 IX, 1918, [[ worker ]]). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8C/78/378C78C2E6D6552BA8A9B3939F007FCB.xml b/data/37/8C/78/378C78C2E6D6552BA8A9B3939F007FCB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..12499948a16 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8C/78/378C78C2E6D6552BA8A9B3939F007FCB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Araceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/araceae.html + +url + + + + + +Pistia stratiotes +L. + + + + + +Wassersalat + + + + +Art ISFS: 306350 Checklist: 1034170 +Araceae +Pistia +Pistia stratiotes L. + + +Zusammenfassung +KEINE ANGABE + + + +Oekologie + + + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + +KEINE ANGABE + + +
+
+ + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl L--Salzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl T--
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +--
+ + + + +Nomenklatur + + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Pistia stratiotes +L. + + + + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Wassersalat +Nom +francais +: + +Spirodele +a +plusieurs racines + +Nome italiano: +Lattuga acquatica + + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Pistia stratiotes L. + + +Checklist 2017 + +306350
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Kommentare aus der +Checklist 2017 +Neues Taxon: +Gegenueber +SISF-2 neu aufgenommener Neophyt. Checklist + + + + +Status Indigenat +: Neophyt: nach der Entdeckung von Amerika in der Region aufgetreten (nach 1500) + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8C/90/378C9070B2DD579A2F5B937581DA4D8F.xml b/data/37/8C/90/378C9070B2DD579A2F5B937581DA4D8F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c0cd03c7316 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8C/90/378C9070B2DD579A2F5B937581DA4D8F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,674 @@ + + + +Ichthyofauna of the Kubo, Tochikura, and Ichinono river systems (Kitakami River drainage, northern Japan), with a comparison of predicted and surveyed species richness + + + +Author + +Miyazaki, Yusuke + + + +Author + +Nakae, Masanori + + + +Author + +Senou, Hiroshi + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1093 +1093 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1093 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1093 +1314-2828-2-1093 + + + + +Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 19450 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′54″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°01′34″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Hiroshi Senou; dateIdentified: 2007; Event: year: 2007; month: 9; day: 12; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 19451 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′41″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°01′53″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2007; Event: year: 2007; month: 9; day: 10; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 19452 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′41″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°01′53″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2007; Event: year: 2007; month: 9; day: 10; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 21216 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′55″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°02′03″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 5; day: 1; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 21413 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′19″N; verbatimLongitude: 140°59′29″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 6; day: 4; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 22255 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +Tochikura River +; verbatimLatitude: 38°54′43.6″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°01′25.1″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 7; day: 5; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 22259 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +Kubo River +; verbatimLatitude: 38°54′55.4″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°04′23.7″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 7; day: 9; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 22272 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°53′43.8″N; verbatimLongitude: 140°58′42.4″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 9; day: 16; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 22273 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°53′43.8″N; verbatimLongitude: 140°58′42.4″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 9; day: 16; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 22284 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′41.3″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°02′06.3″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 8; day: 23; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 22285 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′41.3″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°02′06.3″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 8; day: 23; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 23971 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +2 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′33″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°01′53″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 8; day: 2; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 23972 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′49″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°01′56″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 7; day: 13; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 23973 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′21″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°03′30″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 5; day: 18; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 23974 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′21″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°03′30″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 5; day: 18; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 23975 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′21″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°03′30″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 5; day: 18; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 23976 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +5 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′37″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°01′48″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 8; day: 2; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 23977 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′25″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°04′06″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 5; day: 16; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 23978 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′25″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°04′06″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 5; day: 16; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 24413 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki and Shogo Nishihara +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +channel of rice paddy, Tochikura River Basin +; verbatimLatitude: 38°54′31″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°00′48″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 9; day: 21; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 24422 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; municipality: Genbi Town; verbatimLatitude: 38°56′12″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°02′03″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 9; day: 20; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 24464 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; municipality: Genbi Town; verbatimLatitude: 38°56′12″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°02′03″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 9; day: 21; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 24465 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; municipality: Genbi Town; verbatimLatitude: 38°56′12″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°02′03″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 9; day: 21; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 24475 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; municipality: Magaribuchi, Hagishou; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′49″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°01′56″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 9; day: 22; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +KPM-NI 24476 +; recordedBy: +Yusuke Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; municipality: Magaribuchi, Hagishou; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′49″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°01′56″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2009; Event: year: 2009; month: 9; day: 22; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +NSMT-P 90711 +; recordedBy: +Y. Miyazaki +; individualCount: +6 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; municipality: Hagishou; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′54″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°02′01″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 5; day: 1; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +NSMT-P 90720 +; recordedBy: +Y. Miyazaki +; individualCount: +9 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; municipality: Hagishou; verbatimLatitude: 38°55′31″N; verbatimLongitude: 140°59′57″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 5; day: 3; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +NSMT-P 90722 +; recordedBy: +Y. Miyazaki +; individualCount: +9 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; municipality: Hagishou; verbatimLatitude: 38°54′32″N; verbatimLongitude: 141°00′45″E; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 5; day: 3; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +NSMT-P 91202 +; recordedBy: +Y. Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +Tochikura River +; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 7; day: 5; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +NSMT-P 91205 +; recordedBy: +Y. Miyazaki +; individualCount: +2 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +Tochikura River +; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 7; day: 8; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +NSMT-P 91651 +; recordedBy: +Y. Miyazaki +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +Kubo River +; Identification: identifiedBy: Yusuke Miyazaki; dateIdentified: 2008; Event: year: 2008; month: 7; day: 9; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +NSMT-P 96831 +; recordedBy: +Y. Miyazaki and Yoko Takata +; individualCount: +1 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +Tochikura River +; Identification: identifiedBy: Takashi P. Satoh; dateIdentified: 2010; Event: year: 2008; month: 10; day: 9; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +NSMT-P 96856 +; recordedBy: +Y. Miyazaki and Yoko Takata +; individualCount: +3 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +irrigation pond of the Kubo River Basin +; Identification: identifiedBy: Yoko Takata; dateIdentified: 2010; Event: year: 2008; month: 10; day: 8; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +NSMT-P 96857 +; recordedBy: +Y. Miyazaki and Yoko Takata +; individualCount: +2 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; municipality: Hagishou; Identification: identifiedBy: Takashi P. Satoh; dateIdentified: 2010; Event: year: 2008; month: 10; day: 8; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +NSMT-P 96897 +; recordedBy: +Y. Miyazaki and Yoko Takata +; individualCount: +4 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +Tochikura River +; Identification: identifiedBy: Yoko Takata; dateIdentified: 2010; Event: year: 2008; month: 10; day: 10; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +NSMT-P 96899 +; recordedBy: +Y. Miyazaki and Yoko Takata +; individualCount: +2 +; Taxon: scientificName: Pseudorasboraparva; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Iwate; locality: +Kubo River +; Identification: identifiedBy: Yoko Takata; dateIdentified: 2010; Event: year: 2008; month: 10; day: 10; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Ecological interactions + +Native status + +Non-native (domestic non-native species in Iwate Prefecture: +Matsuzawa and Senou 2008 +). + + + + +Distribution +Far East Asia + + +Notes + +This species was captured only from lentic enviroments, and was often found together with +Cyprinus rubrofuscus +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8C/EC/378CEC298F314001ECC4AC2F455E14DA.xml b/data/37/8C/EC/378CEC298F314001ECC4AC2F455E14DA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..27825f66d3b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8C/EC/378CEC298F314001ECC4AC2F455E14DA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ + + + +Ninety-eight new species of Trigonopterus weevils from Sundaland and the Lesser Sunda Islands + + + +Author + +Riedel, Alexander + + + +Author + +Taenzler, Rene + + + +Author + +Balke, Michael + + + +Author + +Rahmadi, Cahyo + + + +Author + +Suhardjono, Yayuk R. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2014 + +467 + + +1 +162 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.467.8206 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.467.8206 +1313-2970-467-1 +319040F01D0F495092BFA2FF705517AF +319040F01D0F495092BFA2FF705517AF + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Coleoptera Curculionidae + + + +16. +Trigonopterus bornensis Riedel +sp. n. + + + +Diagnostic description. + +Holotype, male (Fig. 16a). Length 2.81 mm. Color of antennae light ferruginous, pronotum black, remainder dark ferruginous. Body in dorsal aspect with marked constriction between pronotum and elytron; in profile dorsally convex. Rostrum with median and pair of indistinct submedian ridges; intervening furrows containing row of coarse punctures, with rows of erect scales; epistome with transverse, irregular ridge. Pronotum with sides subparallel in basal half, anteriorly rounded to indistinct subapical constriction; disk densely punctate; interspaces subglabrous; each puncture containing small recumbent seta. Elytra with striae marked by small punctures, each containing minute seta; intervals flat, subglabrous, with few interspersed punctures; sutural intervals with additional row of punctures; elytral apex pointed, densely coarsely punctate, suture incised. Femora with crenate anteroventral ridge. Metafemur subapically with stridulatory patch. Dorsal edge of tibiae with subbasal angulation, dentate in pro- and mesotibia. Abdominal ventrites 1-2 weakly concave to flat, subglabrous, with sparse erect scales; abdominal ventrite 5 flat, basally subglabrous, apically sparsely punctate, microreticulate, with sparse erect scales. Penis (Fig. 16b) with sides of body subparallel, slightly diverging; apex subtruncate, with median, triangular extension; endophallus containing numerous coarse denticles, apically with pair of sclerites; transfer apparatus digiform, slightly curved; apodemes 2.5 +x +as long as body; ductus ejaculatorius without distinct bulbus. Intraspecific variation. Length 2.35-2.81 mm. Female rostrum dorsally subglabrous, with submedian row of coarse punctures, subapically punctate, sublaterally with sparse rows of subrecumbent scales; epistome simple. Female elytral apex simple. + + + +Material examined. + +Holotype (MZB): ARC0710 (EMBL # LM655535), E-Kalimantan Prov., Berau Dist., Hutan Wisata Sei Tangap, ca. 8 km W of Tanjungredeb, +N02°08.07' +, +E117°24.65' +, 30 m, 02-X-2008. Paratypes (MZB, SMNK): E-Kalimantan Prov., Berau Dist.: 9 exx, ARC0711 (EMBL # LM655536), ARC0712 (EMBL # LM655537), ARC0713 (EMBL # LM655538), same data as holotype; 1 ex, Hutan Mayang Mangurai, ca. 15 km SW of Tanjungredeb, +N02°06.217' +, +E117°24.003' +, 20m, 30-XI-2008. + + + +Distribution. +E-Kalimantan Prov. (Tanjungredeb). Elevation: 20-30 m. + + +Etymology. +This epithet is based on the island of Borneo. + + +Notes. + +Trigonopterus bornensis +Riedel, sp. n. was coded as " +Trigonopterus +sp. 311". + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8D/22/378D227E76CA5AB9A6390211CB665B24.xml b/data/37/8D/22/378D227E76CA5AB9A6390211CB665B24.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4c2598acd4a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8D/22/378D227E76CA5AB9A6390211CB665B24.xml @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@ + + + +New camaenid genus and species from Zhejiang, East China (Eupulmonata, Helicoidea) + + + +Author + +Wu, Min +0000-0002-5434-5544 +School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Xianlindadao 163, Qixia, Nanjing 210023, China + + + +Author + +Chen, Tian +Southern University of Science and Technology, Xueyandadao 1088, Nanshan, Shenzhen 518055, China + + + +Author + +Shen, Wang +School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Xianlindadao 163, Qixia, Nanjing 210023, China + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2024 + +2024-05-15 + + +1202 + + +135 +154 + + + +journal article +296097 +10.3897/zookeys.1202.118964 +d47b42c1-b1c5-4a5c-85cf-2c4df5dba342 +B73212F2-69AA-4703-826B-ADE235E8B7E0 + + + + + +Sinocamaena +Wu + +gen. nov. + + + + +Chinese name. + +中华坚螺属. + + + + +Type +species. + + + + +Sinocamaena cheni +Wu + +, +gen. et sp. nov. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Shell depressed. Protoconch and teleoconch granulate. Protoconch strongly sculptured. Peristome expanded. Head wart low and tiny. Between the ommatophore insertions, a gland pore present. A mantle lobe present. Penial sheath absent. Epiphallus very short. Epiphallic papilla well developed. Flagellum absent. + + + +Description. + +Shell depressed. Whorls slightly convex. Suture slightly impressed. Umbilicus broad. Protoconch with granules on strong radial sculpture. Peristome expanded. Adult shell surface without ribs, hairs or scales. Growth lines fine and evenly broken into granules on teleoconch. Shell with several thin bands above and beneath carina. +General anatomy. A small pore externally present between ommatophore insertions. Eversible head wart very weakly developed. A mantle lobe present. +Genitalia. Penial sheath absent. Penis externally without penial caecum. Pilasters inside penis low and weak. Epiphallus very short. Epiphallic papilla rather developed. Flagellum absent. + + + +Etymology. + + +This new genus is named after “ sino ” (= +China +) and “ camaena ” which is a camaenid genus that includes many large-sized helicoid species. + + + + +Distribution. + + +China +: +Zhejiang +. + + + + +Remarks. + + +The new genus is conchologically close to many camaenids, such as + +Camaena +Albers, 1850 + +and + +Burmochloritis +Godwin-Austen, 1920 + +, in having a large helicoid shell with multiple slender bands. In comparison to + +Camaena + +(sensu +Schileyko 2003 +), the new genus has a strongly sculptured protoconch and an extremely short epiphallus (the part between penial retractor muscle insertion and vas deferens insertion), but has neither the axial corrugated pilasters within penis nor the flagellum. The new genus differs from + +Burmochloritis +( +Páll-Gergely et al. 2023 +) + +in the absence of the flagellum, the long cylindrical epiphallus, the penial caecum and the dart sac. + +Sinocamaena + +gen. nov. +shares with + +Sinochloritis + +the possession of granules on the protoconch and the characters from both general and genital anatomy, including the presence of a visible gland pore between the ommatophore insertions, a mantle lobe, a well-developed epiphallic papilla and the absence of a penial sheath and a dart sac apparatus. Compared to + +Sinochloritis + +, the new taxon has neither a flagellum nor a long epiphallus with the cylindrical trunk, nor prominent penial pilasters. In terms of shell morphology, generally, the new genus looks different from any other Chinese indigenous camaenid genus. Regardless of the shell morphology, all the other Chinese camaenid genera having no dart sac apparatus, i. e., + +Amphidromus +Albers, 1850 + +, + +Landouria +Godwin-Austen, 1918 + +, + +Pancala +Kuroda & Habe, 1949 + +, + +Satsuma + +, + +Yakuchloritis +Habe, 1955 + +, + +Pseudostegodera + +and the above mentioned + +Sinochloritis + +, possess a well-developed flagellum in the male part of genitalia (table +1 in +Wu 2023 +). The present phylogeny (Fig. +7 +) suggests that the new taxon is possibly the nearest relative of almost all the members of dart sac-bearing bradybaenines endemic to the South +Gansu +Plateau or Central +China +. + + +It is noteworthy that the taxa that are basal on the phylogram, i. e., + +Nesiohelix + +, + +Traumatophora + +, + +Acusta + +, + +Bradybaena + +, + +Plectotropis + +, + +Aegista + +, + +Euhadra + +, + +Satsuma + +, + +Camaena + +, have mantle lobes. In general, the camaenids from Central +China +constitute a monophyly that receives high support values (clade X in Fig. +7 +), in which all terminals have a dart sac apparatus but lack a mantle lobe. The extended study of mantle lobes in helicoids taken here suggests that the presence of the mantle lobe could be a widely distributed and possibly a plesiomorphic character in the superfamily +Helicoidea +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8D/4F/378D4FB8DA27C4AA6203B67C2D3D4E1F.xml b/data/37/8D/4F/378D4FB8DA27C4AA6203B67C2D3D4E1F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..11466171817 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8D/4F/378D4FB8DA27C4AA6203B67C2D3D4E1F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + +Targeting a portion of central European spider diversity for permanent preservation + + + +Author + +Candek, Klemen + + + +Author + +Gregoric, Matjaz + + + +Author + +Kostanjsek, Rok + + + +Author + +Frick, Holger + + + +Author + +Kropf, Christian + + + +Author + +Kuntner, Matjaz + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2013 + +1 + + +980 +980 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e980 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e980 +1314-2828--980 + + + + +Synema globosum (Fabricius, 1775) + + + +Materials + + +Occurrence: recordedBy: + +Kuntner, +Gregoric +, +Candek + +; sex: +1 female +; Location: locationID: CH15; country: +Switzerland +; locality: +Glarus Alps, near Affeier +; minimumElevationInMeters: 817; maximumElevationInMeters: 817; decimalLatitude: +46.7606 +; decimalLongitude: +9.0933 +; Event: eventDate: +2011-07-10 +; habitat: meadow and forest + + +Occurrence: recordedBy: + +Candek + +; sex: +2 males +; Location: locationID: SI60; country: +Slovenia +; locality: +Budanje +; minimumElevationInMeters: 295; maximumElevationInMeters: 295; decimalLatitude: +45.8799 +; decimalLongitude: +13.9459 +; Event: eventDate: +2011-05-07 +; habitat: forest clearing + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8D/77/378D7779CB39E8E82DA7CA6A5427DA46.xml b/data/37/8D/77/378D7779CB39E8E82DA7CA6A5427DA46.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4d77bc2bdd4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8D/77/378D7779CB39E8E82DA7CA6A5427DA46.xml @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Platylabus opaculus Thomson, 1888 + + + +Distribution +England, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8D/B0/378DB03238FE5DA98E99CA247746CAB4.xml b/data/37/8D/B0/378DB03238FE5DA98E99CA247746CAB4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4becc936928 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8D/B0/378DB03238FE5DA98E99CA247746CAB4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,526 @@ + + + +On four species of the genus Argiope Audouin, 1826 (Araneae, Araneidae) from China + + + +Author + +Wang, Cheng +College of Agriculture and Forestry Engineering and Planning, Tongren University, Tongren, Guizhou, 554300, China & Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization in the Fanjing Mountain Region, Tongren University, Tongren, Guizhou, 554300, China + + + +Author + +Gan, Jiahui +College of Agriculture and Forestry Engineering and Planning, Tongren University, Tongren, Guizhou, 554300, China & Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization in the Fanjing Mountain Region, Tongren University, Tongren, Guizhou, 554300, China + + + +Author + +Mi, Xiaoqi +College of Agriculture and Forestry Engineering and Planning, Tongren University, Tongren, Guizhou, 554300, China & Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization in the Fanjing Mountain Region, Tongren University, Tongren, Guizhou, 554300, China +mixiaoqi1018@163.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2021 + +2021-02-22 + + +1019 + + +15 +34 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1019.59521 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1019.59521 +1313-2970-1019-15 +E82C1123AD82411DB10D66D029574647 +BECB7FDA339A502D829AFA9E27190D6B + + + + +Argiope perforata Schenkel, 1963 +Figures 5 +, 6 +, 7 +, 10 + + + + +Argiope perforata +Schenkel 1963: 135, fig. 79a, b (♀, female holotype from China locality Lunan fu City, Szetchuan Province and deposited in the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, not examined); +Levi 1983 +: 293, figs 162-166 (♀); Wang 1988: 101, figs 1-3 (♂, mismatched); +Yin et al. 1997 +: 78, fig. 11a-i (♀; ♂, mismatched); Song et al. 1999: 262, figs 151V, Y, Z, 153B, M (♀; ♂, mismatched); Yin et al. 2012: 578, fig. 278a-i (♀; ♂, mismatched). + + +Argiope abramovi + +Logunov and +Jaeger +2015 + +: 345, figs 1-7 (♀, female holotype from Vietnam, locality 14 km N of Kon Plong Town, Kon Plong District, Kon Tum Province and deposited in the Zoological Museum of Moscow University (ZMMU), Moscow, Russia, not examined). Syn. nov. + + + +Material examined. + +China +- +Guizhou Province +• 1♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-42), Tongren City, Bijiang District, Wenbi Park ( +27°43.26'N +, +109°10.03'E +, ca 460 m), 19.v.2013, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 1♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-43), same locality, 10.vi.2017, Cheng Wang leg. • 3♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-44-46), Tongren City, Jiangkou County, Dewang Township, Baxi Village, Nanmuping ( +27°51.68'N +, +108°36.88'E +, ca 900 m), 10.vi.2013, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 5♀4♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-47-55), same locality, 14.vi.2013, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 6♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-56-61), same locality, 15-16.vii.2015, Cheng Wang and Mingyong Liao leg. • 2♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-62-63), Tongren City, Jiangkou County, Dewang Township, Baxi Village, Datuzu, 10.vi.2013, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 1♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-64), Tongren City, Yinjiang County, Muhuang Township, Jinchang Village ( +28°01.37'N +, +108°45.00'E +, ca 1300 m), 14.vii.2013, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 1♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-65), Tongren City, Songtao County, Wuluo Township, Lengjiaba Village ( +27°54.93'N +, +108°36.70'E +, ca 1150 m), 15.vii.2013, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 3♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-66-68), same locality, 10.vii.2015, Cheng Wang and Mingyong Liao leg. • 3♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-69-71), Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Libo County, Dongtang Township, Yaosuo Village, Bizuo, Maolan National Nature Reserve ( +25°16.37'N +, +108°02.97'E +, ca 550 m), 07-10.viii.2013, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 1♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-72), Tongren City, Jiangkou County, near the Kaima primary school ( +27°50.77'N +, +108°46.43'E +, ca 530 m), 07.vii.2015, Cheng Wang and Mingyong Liao leg. • 2♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-73-74), Tongren City, Jiangkou County, Taiping Township, Kuaichang Village, Macaohe ( +27°49.08'N +, +108°51.52'E +, ca 680 m), 08.vii.2015, Cheng Wang and Mingyong Liao leg. • 1♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-75), Tongren City, Yinjiang County, Ziwei Township, Zhangjiaba Village ( +27°56.62'N +, +108°36.60'E +, ca 780 m), 12.vii.2015, Cheng Wang and Mingyong Liao leg. • 1♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-76), Tongren City, Yinjiang County, Ziwei Township, Tuanlong Village ( +27°54.93'N +, +108°42.70'E +, ca 1150 m), 14.vii.2015, Cheng Wang et al. leg. • 3♀1♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-77-80), Tongren City, Jiangkou County, Dengwang Township, Jinghe Village, Xujiagou ( +27°48.29'N +, +108°37.45'E +, ca 820 m), 20.vii.2015, Cheng Wang et al. leg. • 2♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-81-82), Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, Shibing County, Yuntaishan Scenic Area ( +27°07.74'N +, +108°06.57'E +, ca 990 m), 30.vii.2015, Cheng Wang et al. leg. • 4♀1♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-83-87), Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Libo County, Maolan National Nature Reserve ( +25°16.07'N +, +108°59.07'E +, ca 760 m), 30.iv.2016, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 1♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-88), Zunyi City, Xishui County, Sanchahe Township, Sanchahe Village ( +28°29.04'N +, +106°25.28'E +, ca 800 m), 29.vii.2016, Cheng Wang et al. leg. • 4♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-89-92), Zunyi City, Xishui County, Sanchahe Township, Sanchahe Village, Tiantangba ( +28°26.37'N +, +106°24.96'E +, ca 1000 m), 30.vii.2016, Cheng Wang et al. leg. • 2♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-93-94), Tongren City, Bijiang District, Tianshengqiao Scenic Area ( +27°49.80'N +, +109°12.77'E +, ca 580 m), 12.v.2018, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 1♀1♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-95-96), Tongren City, Shiqian County, Pingshan Township, Daping Village ( +27°17.97'N +, +108°10.05'E +, ca 720 m), 08.vi.2019, Cheng Wang et al. leg. • 1♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-97), Tongren City, Songtao County, Wuluo Township, Taohuayuan Village ( +27°58.04'N +, +108°47.73'E +, ca 790 m), 29.v.2017, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 3♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-98-100), Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, Leishan County, Fangxiang Township, Getou Village ( +26°24.09'N +, +108°15.40'E +, ca 1100 m), night of 22.vii.2017, Cheng Wang et al. leg. • 1♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-101), Guiyang City, Guanshanhu District, Donglinsi Park ( +26°39.60'N +, +106°38.00'E +, ca 1300 m), 23.v.2018, Cheng Wang leg. • 1♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-102), Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, Zhenyuan County, Dadi Township, Dadi Village ( +27°21.56'N +, +108°12.29'E +, ca 700 m), night of 23.v.2018, Xiaoqi Mi leg. • 3♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-103-105), Tongren City, Shiqian County, Pingshan Township, Fodingshan Village, Yaoshang ( +27°20.54'N +, +108°09.50'E +, ca 640 m), night of 24.v.2018, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 3♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-106-108), Tongren City, Yinjiang County, Yangxi Township ( +27°38.53'N +, +108°26.43'E +, ca 700 m), 17.vi.2018, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 1♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-109), Tongren City, Shiqian County, Ganxi Township, near the 524 road ( +27°25.10'N +, +108°07.97'E +, ca 550 m), night of 06.vi.2019, Cheng Wang et al. leg. • 2♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-110-111), Shibing County, Baiduo Township, Heichong ( +27°9.37'N +, +108°07.40'E +, ca 990 m), 20.vi.2019, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg. • 1♀(TRU- +Araneidae +-112), Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, Shibing County, Chengguan Township ( +27°03.02'N +, +108°7.78'E +, ca 700 m), night of 21.vi.2019, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg.; +China +- +Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region +• 1♀2♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-113-115), Fangchenggang City, Shangsi County, Shiwandashan National Forest Park ( +21°53.87'N +, +107°54.26'E +, ca 370 m), 14.viii.2017, Xiaoqi Mi et al. leg.; +China +- +Hainan Province +- +Ledong County +- +Jianfeng Township +- +Jianfengling National Nature Reserve +• 1♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-116), Mingfeng Valley ( +18°44.61'N +, +108°51.24'E +, ca 810 m), night of 12.iv.2019, Cheng Wang and Yuanfa Yang leg. • 1♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-117), Sanfenqu ( +18°45.24'N +, +108°51.57'E +, ca 900 m), night of 13.iv.2019, Cheng Wang and Yuanfa Yang leg. • 1♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-118), Tianchi ( +18°45.22'N +, +108°51.53'E +, ca 850 m), 14.iv.2019, Cheng Wang & Yuanfa Yang leg. • 2♀1♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-119-121), Sanfenqu ( +18°45.24'N +, +108°51.57'E +, ca 900 m), night of 14.iv.2019, Cheng Wang and Yuanfa Yang leg. • 2♀ (TRU- +Araneidae +-122-123), Yulin Valley, Zijin Waterfull ( +18°44.79'N +, +108°55.76'E +, ca 630 m), 15.iv.2019, Cheng Wang and Yuanfa Yang leg. • 1♂ (TRU- +Araneidae +-124), Tianchi ( +18°45.22'N +, +108°51.53'E +, ca 850 m), night of 15.iv.2019, Cheng Wang and Yuanfa Yang leg. + + + +Figure 5. +Habitus of + +Argiope perforata + +Schenkel, 1963 +A-C +female (TRU- +Araneidae +-122) +D, E +male (TRU- +Araneidae +-118) +A, D +dorsal +B +lateral +C, E +ventral. Scale bars: 1.0 mm. + + + + +Figure 6. +Male palp of + +Argiope perforata + +Schenkel, 1963 (TRU- +Araneidae +-118) +A +prolateral +B +apical +C +retrolateral +D +median apophysis, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +The male of this species resembles + +A. aetheroides + +Yin, Wang, Zhang, Peng & Chen, 1989 in the general shape of the palp, but it differs in the distal end of embolus is slender (Fig. +6A +) versus flattened in + +A. aetheroides + +( +Yin et al. 1997 +: fig. 13h), and the median apophysis is bifurcated at its distal end in posterior view (Fig. +6D +) versus bifurcated at the base in + +A. aetheroides + +( +Yin et al. 1997 +: fig. 13i). The female of the species closely resembles + +A. anasuja + +Thorell, 1887 in having the epigynal flange and broad posterior plate, but it differs in the median septum being less than 1/3 of the posterior plate width in ventral view (Fig. +7A-C +), versus more than 1/3 of the posterior plate width in + +A. anasuja + +( +Levi 1983 +: fig. 167) and the dorsal abdomen possesses white patches laterally (Fig. +5A, B +), versus has three wide, transverse white patches in + +A. anasuja + +( +Levi 1983 +: fig. 170). + + + +Description. + +Male +(TRU- +Araneidae +-118). Total length 3.65. Carapace 1.98 long, 1.90 wide; abdomen 1.90 long, 1.37 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.14, ALE 0.07, PME 0.15, PLE 0.12, AME-AME 0.13, AME-ALE 0.07, PME-PME 0.18, PME-PLE 0.16. Legs: I 9.59 (2.67, 3.01, 2.81, 1.10), II 9.39 (2.67, 2.95, 2.67, 1.10), III 5.05 (1.67, 1.48, 1.14, 0.76), IV 7.59 (2.48, 2.24, 2.01, 0.86). Carapace (Fig. +5D +) pale pink, flat, acutely narrowed anteriorly, with indistinct, brown, radial markings on the thorax. Fovea linear, chelicerae and endites (Fig. +5E +) yellow. Labium (Fig. +5E +) pale. Sternum (Fig. +5E +) heart-shaped, paler medially. Legs (Fig. +5D +) yellow, spiny. Abdomen (Fig. +5D, E +) elongate-oval, dorsum pale, darker posteriorly, with two pairs of muscle depressions medially, covered with sparse dark long hairs; venter pale laterally and green-brown medially. Spinnerets yellow, hairy. + + +Palp (Fig. +6A-D +): patella with a long bristle; tibia swollen; paracymbium curved medially, blunt at tip; median apophysis bifurcated, with a short terminal spur; conductor flat, slightly curled; embolus enlarged at proximal end, curved almost 90° medially in prolateral view and with a lance-like tip in apical view. + + +Female +(TRU- +Araneidae +-122). Total length 9.86. Carapace 4.67 long, 4.14 wide; abdomen 5.76 long, 4.48 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.26, ALE 0.15, PME 0.27, PLE 0.26, AME-AME 0.25, AME-ALE 0.34, PME-PME 0.49, PME-PLE 0.51. Legs: I 16.77 (5.13, 5.38, 4.63, 1.63), II 16.51 (5.13, 5.25, 4.50, 1.63), III 9.32 (3.25, 2.69, 2.25, 1.13), IV 14.76 (5.25, 4.38, 3.88, 1.25). Carapace (Fig. +5A, B +) narrowed anteriorly and rounded in thorax region, pale yellow with brown butterfly-shaped markings, covered with sparse hairs. Fovea depressed. Chelicerae (Fig. +5C +) pale yellow. Endites, labium (Fig. +5C +) dark at base with pale tip. Sternum (Fig. +5C +) heart-shaped, red-brown laterally, with a longitudinal white band and a pair of white spots posterio-laterally. Legs yellow to yellow-brown. Abdomen (Fig. +5A-C +) suboval with a pair of anterior-lateral humps, dorsum silver with three pairs of lateral transverse brown stripes, and a broad golden marking gradually narrowing from the middle part to the terminus; venter dark-brown with a pair of white longitudinal bands laterally. Spinnerets yellow, hairy. Epigyne (Fig. +7A-F +) longer than wide, with a narrow, constricted septum; the posterior plate broad, almost 3/4 of the epigynal width. + + + +Figure 7. +Epigyne-vulva of + +Argiope perforata + +Schenkel, 1963 +A +TRU- +Araneidae +-116 +B +TRU- +Araneidae +-122 +C-F +TRU- +Araneidae +-123 +A-C +ventral +D +lateral +E +posterior +F +dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. + + + + +Distribution. +China (Hainan, Guangxi). + + +GenBank accession numbers. + +TRU- +Araneidae +-116: MW464195, TRU- +Araneidae +-121: MW464196. + + + +Comments. + + +Argiope perforata + +was originally described based on the female holotype from Sichuan, China; the illustrations are poor. It was redescribed and better illustrated by +Levi (1983) +who based on a specimen from Guangdong, China. Herein, the opposite sexes of the new specimens were collected from the same localities, and their pairing has been supported by the result of DNA barcoding. Additionally, the male of + +A. perforata + +, as described by Wang (1988), is considered to be mismatched and herein proposed to be the male of + +A. boesenbergi + +Levi, 1983 due to the close resemblances in palp structure. Besides, + +A. abramovi + +Logunov & +Jaeger +, 2015 is almost indistinguishable from the new material of + +A. perforata + +in the epigynal structures and generally habitus markings, except that there are some differences in the dorsal abdomen markings; thus, + +A. abramovi + +is suggested as a synonym of + +A. perforata + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8E/14/378E142A2F639CA274A1C99B7F52F714.xml b/data/37/8E/14/378E142A2F639CA274A1C99B7F52F714.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..38e68d6f396 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8E/14/378E142A2F639CA274A1C99B7F52F714.xml @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ + + + +Nematodes from terrestrial and freshwater habitats in the Arctic + + + +Author + +Holovachov, Oleksandr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1165 +1165 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1165 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1165 +1314-2828-2-1165 + + + + +Chrysodorus filiformis (Bastian, 1865) + + + + +Dorylaimus filiformis +Bastian, 1865 + + + +Notes + +Greenland ( + +Allgen +1954 + +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8E/B6/378EB6CC27201690646935FB769A2F6D.xml b/data/37/8E/B6/378EB6CC27201690646935FB769A2F6D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d9482265c89 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8E/B6/378EB6CC27201690646935FB769A2F6D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ + + + +Ameisen von Madagaskar, den Comoren und Ostafrika. + + + +Author + +Forel, A. + +text + + +Reise in Ostafrika in den Jahren 1903 - 1905 mitteln der Hermann und Elise geb. Heckmann Wentzel-Stiftung ausgeführt von Professor Dr. Alfred Voeltzkow. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse + + + +Editor + +Voeltzkow, A. + + +1907 + +Ameisen von Madagaskar, den Comoren und Ostafrika + + +2 + + +2 + + +75 +92 + + + +journal article +4012 +10.5281/zenodo.11539 + + + + +Cremastogaster tricolor +Gerst. + + + + +Diese Art wurde im gleichen Jahre (1858) mit +castanea +Smith aufgestellt, ist aber unzweideutiger zu erkennen, und mit richtiger Vaterlandsangabe (Smith gibt Albanien als Vaterland seiner afrikanischen Art an!) .. Da ich beide Arten fuer fast identisch halte, betrachte ich nun +castanea +als Varietaet von +tricolor +. +Castanea +ist nur etwas kleiner, weniger schon, matter gefaerbt und identisch mit der Varietaet der +tricolor +, die ich +decolor +genannt hatte. Daraus ergibt sich: + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8E/D4/378ED437B204DFBC391B1AA85A4F4073.xml b/data/37/8E/D4/378ED437B204DFBC391B1AA85A4F4073.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f01faeb3239 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8E/D4/378ED437B204DFBC391B1AA85A4F4073.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Twenty-four new species of Polycentropus (Trichoptera, Polycentropodidae) from Brazil + + + +Author + +Hamilton, Steven W. + + + +Author + +Holzenthal, Ralph W. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +76 + + +1 +53 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.76.790 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.76.790 +1313-2970-76-1 + + + + +Polycentropus inusitatus Hamilton & Holzenthal +sp. n. +Fig. 23 + + + + +Polycentropus +new species 9 +Hamilton 1986 +: 140-142, 239; Fig. 6.45. + + + +Description. + +Polycentropus inusitatus +sp. n.is most similar to +Polycentropus cachoeira +, but may be differentiated from it by the absence of the endothecal sclerotic band, the divided apicoventral process of the phallobase, and the shorter mesoventral process of the preanal appendage. + +Adult. Length of forewing (male) 5.5-5.8 mm. Body brown; dorsum of head and thorax dark brown; forewings nearly denuded, membrane pale brown with white areas at r-m, m, m-cu crossveins (in alcohol); legs paler apically. +Male. Genitalia as in Fig. 23. Sternum IX in lateral view trapezoidal, about 2/3 height of segment VIII; in ventral view slightly trapezoidal, anterior corners nearly angular, sides constriction anteriorly, anterior margin nearly straight, posterior margin slightly concave with very broad, shallow convex medial region. Terga IX + X membranous. Intermediate appendage absent. Mesolateral process of preanal appendage short, apex rounded, shorter ventrally, at base broadly joined to mesoventral process; mesoventral process directed caudad, broadly truncate, about 1/2 length of mesolateral process. Inferior appendage in lateral view moderately long, rhomboidal; dorsolateral flange low, straight dorsally, with prominent caudomesal spine, exposed in lateral view; mesoventral spine absent; in ventral view inferior appendage rhomboidal, caudomesal spine prominent, acute. Phallobase short; in lateral view apicoventral projection broad, slightly shorter than diameter of apical diameter of phallobase apex, with 2 points; separated by narrow mesal split dividing apical 1/2; endothecal sclerotic band absent; with pair of large endothecal spines; phallotremal sclerite narrow in dorsal aspect. Subphallic sclerite U-shaped, arms long, pedicel absent; very narrow in lateral view. + + +Figure 23. +Polycentropus inusitatus +sp. n. Male genitalia: A lateral B dorsal C ventral D phallus, lateral E phallus, dorsal F subphallic sclerite, caudal. + + + + +Holotype male: +BRAZIL: Rio de Janerio: Brejo da Lapa, Itatiaia, Coll. Museum Nacional, R. J., no date (NMNH). + + +Paratype: +same data as holotype, 1 male (NMNH). + +The +holotype and the paratype were sent to the senior author by Luiz S. W. Terra, Estacao Aquicola, Vila do Conde, Portugal. + + + +Etymology. +Latin for rare, uncommon, or unusual, in reference to our knowledge of only 2 specimens. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8F/5E/378F5EBBB523A8B6BE7515475CB6B4FB.xml b/data/37/8F/5E/378F5EBBB523A8B6BE7515475CB6B4FB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..078741a26be --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8F/5E/378F5EBBB523A8B6BE7515475CB6B4FB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Cratichneumon vulpecula (Kriechbaumer, 1875) + + + + +Ichneumon vulpecula +Kriechbaumer, 1875 + + +pseudogracilentus +(Strobl, 1901, +Ichneumon +) + + +hemerythrus +Heinrich, 1949 + + + +Distribution +Scotland + + +Notes +NMS, det. Hilpert, added here + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8F/B1/378FB1318EA5C2BE509EA034F19308DE.xml b/data/37/8F/B1/378FB1318EA5C2BE509EA034F19308DE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c5b3fbfde76 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8F/B1/378FB1318EA5C2BE509EA034F19308DE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Myriopoden von Kreta, nebst Bitraegen zur allgemeinen Kenntnis einger Gattungen + + + +Author + +Karl Graf Attems + +text + + +Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe, Wien + + +1902 + +111 + + +527 +614 + + + + +http://un.availab.le + +journal article +Attems-1902-Lithobius-fasciatus-graeca-unicolor +8A646953-335B-43BF-874A-3D73791174FD + + + + + +Lithobius +fasciatus + +subsp. +graeca +var. +unicolor +. + + + + +Einfarbig gelb. +Hueften +des 15. Beinpaares mit einem, des 14. Beinpaares ohne Seitendorn. Analbeine 1,0,3,1,0/0,1,3,2,2. Im +uebrigen +mit der +var. +picta +uebereinstimmend +. + + + + +Vorkommen: +Tiryns +, +Larisa +bei +Argos +, +Nauplia +, +Kephisia +, +Pentelikon +(Verh). Ich fand ihn nur bei +Tiryns +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/8F/C7/378FC76C03E969A74B06E76BCE79B927.xml b/data/37/8F/C7/378FC76C03E969A74B06E76BCE79B927.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..98df4273fda --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/8F/C7/378FC76C03E969A74B06E76BCE79B927.xml @@ -0,0 +1,294 @@ + + + +Revision of Massylaea Moellendorff, 1898 (Stylommatophora, Helicidae) + + + +Author + +Bouaziz-Yahiatene, Houria + + + +Author + +Pfarrer, Beat + + + +Author + +Medjdoub-Bensaad, Ferroudja + + + +Author + +Eike Neubert, + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +694 + + +109 +133 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.694.15001 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.694.15001 +1313-2970-694-109 +D578638733444BF1BF0D8B12CF666427 + + + + + +Massylaea +vermiculata (O. F. +Mueller +, 1774) + +Figs 13-16 + + + + +Helix vermiculata +O. F. +Mueller +, 1774; Vermium terrestrium et fluviatilium 2: 21 [In Italia sabulosis juxta torrentes]. + + +Helix bonduelliana +Bourguignat, 1863; Mollusques nouveaux, litigieux ou peu connus, fasc. 1: 9, plate 3 figs 1-4 [Province +d'Oran +]. + + +Helix vermiculata var. albida +Bourguignat, 1863; Malacologie de +l'Algerie +I: 112, plate 8 fig. 10 [La Calle]. + + +Helix vermiculata var. aspersa +Bourguignat, 1863; Malacologie de +l'Algerie +I: 112 [Cherchell]. + + +Helix vermiculata var. expallescens +Bourguignat, 1863; Malacologie de +l'Algerie +I: 112 [Environs +d'Alger +, Blidah]. + + +Helix vermiculata var. minuta +Bourguignat, 1863; Malacologie de +l'Algerie +I: 112 [Ile de Galite]. + + +Helix vermiculata var. trizonata +Bourguignat, 1863; Malacologie de +l'Algerie +I: 112 [Philippeville]. + + +Helix fleurati +Bourguignat, 1868; Histoire Malacologique de la +Regence +de Tunis: 12, plate 1 fig. 1-3 [Env. de Tunis (Champs au sud et au sudest de Tunis, entre un vieux puits espagnol et les collines de Sidi ben Hassen et de la forteresse Bordj el +Rais +. Ruines +d'Oudena +. Ruines +d'Utique +et de Carthage. non loin de la chapelle Saint-Louis] + + +Helix fleurati var. obesa +Bourguignat, 1868; Histoire Malacologique de la +Regence +de Tunis: 13 [no locality information given]. + + +Helix fleurati var. subcarinata +Bourguignat, 1868; Histoire Malacologique de la +Regence +de Tunis: 13, plate 1 fig. 4 [no locality information given]. + + +Helix (Macularia) vermiculata var. conoidea +Issel, 1880; Annali del Mus. Civ. di St. Nat. di Genova, Vol. XV: 263 [Sahel, fra Susa e Bir el Buita e fra Susa ed El Gem]. + + +Helix (Macularia) vermiculata var. depressa +Issel, 1880; Annali del Mus. Civ. di St. Nat. di Genova, Vol. XV: 263 [Cartagine]. + + +Helix (Macularia) vermiculata var. minuta +Issel, 1880; Annali del Mus. Civ. di St. Nat. di Genova, Vol. XV: 264 [Is. Galita, Galitone, Aguglia, Gallina (Violante, 1877). Cartagine (Bellucci, 1875)]. + + +Helix toukriana +Bourguignat in + +Pechaud +1883 + +; Excursions malagologiques dans le nord de +l'Afrique +de La Calle a Alger, +d'Alger +a Tanger: 37 [hauts plateaux du Sersou, entre +Ain-Toukria +et le Nahr-Ouassel, dans la direction de +Sebain-Aioun +]. + + +Helix aecouria +Letourneux et Bourguignat, 1887; Prodrome de la malacologie terrestre et fluviatile de la Tunisie: 7 [Environs +d'Houmt-Souk +dans +l'ile +de Djerba]. + + +Helix vermiculata var. saharica +Kobelt, 1887; Iconographie, (2) 3(1): 9, Taf. 6, fig. 343-345 [Biskra]. + + + +Type specimens. + +bonduelliana +: 1 syntype MHNG-MOLL 118415; +aecouria +: 3 syntypes MHNG-MOLL 118413; +fleurati +: syntypes MHNG-MOLL 118440/7 (Env. de Tunis); +toukriana +: syntype MHNG-MOLL 118487; +saharica +: not researched. + + + + +Diagnosis +. + +Medium sized shell, teleoconch with a malleate surface sculpture, and aperture with a slightly raised columellar ridge. + + +Description. +shell medium sized, with a globular to depressed conical spire, basic colour white to grey, up to five brown spiral bands may be present or completely missing; protoconch large (diameter ca. 4 mm), corneous to white; whorls regularly increasing, the last whorl declining at the aperture; teleoconch suture of moderate depth, surface of teleoconch with a characteristic malleate sculpture (sometimes only present close to the aperture!); spiral bands 2+3 often merging, and bands may fuse to a large brown area on the last whorl before the aperture; aperture usually porcelain white with a thick lip, columellar part of aperture with a raised ridge; peristome slightly thickened, umbilicus completely covered by a large reflection of the columellar part of aperture. + +Genital organs (after +Giusti et al. 1995 +; +Neubert and Bank 2006 +; +Holyoak and Holyoak 2017 +): penis clubshaped, bipartite; the bilobed muscular proximal part not visible in outer morphology; epiphallus longer than penis; penial retractor muscle simple, attaching at the boundary of penis and epiphallus; internally, the proximal penial chamber filled by a solid penial papilla, epiphallus opening into the penial chamber via a small pore or on top of a flat papilla. + +Dart sac opening laterally into the short vagina; glandulae mucosae with two central stems giving rise to at least three subsequent branches with at least 40 tubules; diverticulum branches off in a central position from the pedunculus surpassing the bursa copulatrix enormously. + + +Distribution. +This species is widely recorded throughout Tunisia and eastern Algeria. + + +Remarks. + +The synonymy list and illustrations only cover synonyms of +M. vermiculata +important for the area from east Algeria and Tunisia. Here, this species inhabits Mediterranean shrublands as well as the wooded hinterland. It also tolerates coastal dunes with salty spray, and semiarid steppes. +Holyoak and Holyoak (2017) +justify the synoynmisation of +constantina +with +vermiculata +with the similar morphology of the genital organs and the wide overlap in shell size and banding pattern. However, in many land-snails, closely related species cannot be differentiated by the morphology of their genital organs. More attention should be paied to the construction of the penis (bilobed muscular proximal part visible from outside or not) and the variability of attaching system of the retractor muscle, which is much larger (and also connects to the atrium) in the specimen of +constantina +than in any +vermiculata +seen so far. The most important character state that separates the species is the absence of any malleation on the shell surface in +constantina +. Additionally, the phenotypic plasticity of the shells of +vermiculata +is markedly contrasted by the congeneric +M. constantina +, which is extremely stable in respect of the spiral banding pattern. + + +One species mentioned by Kobelt (1887) as a closely related species to his +vermiculata +- +constantina +-complex is +Helix bonduelliana +Bourguignat, 1863, with the type locality "Province +d'Oran" +in western Algeria. Kobelt doubts the correctness of this locality, and speculates that it might originate from Tunisia. According to his personal experience in Algeria, +M. vermiculata +reaches the Isser, but does not expand much to the west of this river. The only exception he found was Cherchell west of Algiers, +where +the species occurred in large numbers, but restricted to and around the harbour, so it can be considered being introduced there. It is not clear how the situation is today along the central and western Algerian coast, but +Kobelt's +lines can be seen as an information on the natural range of this species in northern Africa. In the same year, Bourguignat (1887: 8) records +H. bonduelliana +from Ghardimaou (Tunisia) (= MHNG-BBT 118417/3). +Bourguignat's +collection has another record from "environs de Tunis" under MHNG-MOLL 18416/1. Later, Pallary (1898) mentions his and +Debeaux's +unsuccessful attempts to recollect the species in Oran. Summarising it can be said that the type locality of +H. bonduelliana +is apparently wrong, and the specimens are very probably of Tunisian offspring. This nominal taxon fully falls into the colour variation of +M. vermiculata +, which can reach from completely white shells as exemplified by +H. fleurati +(Fig. 15) to the typical morph as seen in +H. aecouria +(Fig. 14). The shell shape, however, is quite stable in most of these forms, and typical for +M. vermiculata +. The synonymisation of +saharica +Kobelt, 1887 needs reconfirmation by study of the type specimens. + + + +Figures 13-16. +Massylaea vermiculata +(O. F. +Mueller +, 1774). 13 syntype +Helix toukriana +MHNG-MOLL 118487, D = 29.7 mm 14 syntype +Helix aecouria +syntype MHNG-MOLL 118413, D = 28.4 mm 15 syntype +Helix fleurati +MHNG-MOLL 118440, D = 23.9 mm 16 +Helix bonduelliana +Bourguignat, 1863 syntype MHNG-MOLL 118415, D = 27.0 mm. - All figures Neubert/Bochud, natural size. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/90/97/379097C5071FBD87C2F9F190C50FEA3D.xml b/data/37/90/97/379097C5071FBD87C2F9F190C50FEA3D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..819b1e629db --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/90/97/379097C5071FBD87C2F9F190C50FEA3D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ + + + +Order Chiroptera - Family Emballonuridae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +381 +391 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Saccolaimus peli +Temminck 1853 + + + + + + + +Saccolaimus peli +Temminck 1853 + +, + +Esquisses Zool. sur la Cote de +Guine +: 82 + + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +Ghana +, Boutry River. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Pel's Pouched Bat +. + + + + +Distribution: +Liberia +to W +Kenya +south to +Angola +. + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +2003 and +IUCN +/ +SSC +Action Plan (2001) – Lower Risk (nt). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/90/B2/3790B2FC3E1E61BB851ACEF919952D11.xml b/data/37/90/B2/3790B2FC3E1E61BB851ACEF919952D11.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0f0c7fbfec3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/90/B2/3790B2FC3E1E61BB851ACEF919952D11.xml @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Braconidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Mark R. + + + +Author + +Godfray, H. Charles J. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8151 +8151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 +1314-2828--8151 + + + + +Phaenocarpa (Phaenocarpa) eunice (Haliday, 1838) + + + + +Alysia eunice +Haliday, 1838 + + +nimia +Stelfox, 1941 + + + +Distribution +England, Wales, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/90/F2/3790F23CE062158DC0B98D0E601FEFB0.xml b/data/37/90/F2/3790F23CE062158DC0B98D0E601FEFB0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9c6d75963bf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/90/F2/3790F23CE062158DC0B98D0E601FEFB0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ + + + +Three new species of Thelepus Leuckart, 1849 from Europe and a re-description of T. cincinnatus (Fabricius, 1780) (Annelida, Terebellidae) + + + +Author + +Jirkov, Igor + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2018 + +759 + + +29 +56 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.759.22981 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.759.22981 +1313-2970-759-29 +A7645CBDF29D4F99A2C5709197B95F28 +A7645CBDF29D4F99A2C5709197B95F28 + + + + +Thelepus davehalli +sp. n. +Figs 4, 11 + + + +Material + +(Table 1): 444 specimens from 27 stations, collected at depths from 94-495 m, 1.73 ° +C- +11.3 °C. Holotype st. Sevastopol 2587. Material is deposited at the KGB, three paratypes from Sevastopol st.1453 are deposited at the MNCN 16.01/17772. Material from Aveiro (DBUA0000389.01) and Naples (MNCN 16.01/488) is not included in the type series as it was collected too far away from the type locality, despite seeming to be morphologically identical. + + + +Description +(based on holotype and paratypes). Holotype with 97 segments, 32 segments with notopodia, 95 mm length. Paratypes up to 100 mm long and 5 mm wide; number of segments increased with body size, up to 91. + +Several tens of grooved buccal tentacles as long as half body length. Eyespots absent. Branchial filaments numerous, long and tangled (Fig. 4A, C). Due to tangling, it was impossible to count number of branchial filaments in large worms (>5-6 mm width) without removing them one by one. Maximum number of BS1 filaments ca. 20 (13 in holotype), extending laterally to a point level with upper edge of row of U1 uncini. BS2 with ca. ten filaments (nine in holotype). Filaments attached to a transverse elevated stump in 1-2 irregular rows but, due to numerous filaments, there appear to be more rows. Number of filaments increases with body size; small worms (1-2 mm width) with ca. 5 filaments on BS1. Lateral extension of filaments depends upon worm size: in small worms, filaments extend only to a point level with notopodia. Lateral lobes absent. Dorsum with warts or subepithelial honeycomb, forming more or less regular rows (Fig. 4A, C); number of rows increases with size of segments and worms. Segmentation distinct. Nephridial papillae on S5-S7 above neuropodia (Fig. 4C, arrowed), usually poorly visible or not visible; papillae on S4 apparently absent. Ventrum glandular, with +"wrinkling" +(Fig. 4B) increasing with worm size. + + + +Figure 4. +Thelepus davehalli +sp. n. +A-C +anterior end: A dorsal view B ventral view C lateral view (arrowed nephridial papilla) D U48-U52 lateral view E - total view, rectangle shows position of D (arrow indicates last segment with notochaetae) +F-H +uncini: F, G U1 H U48, +A-F +, H Sevastopol st. 2587: +A-E +holotype F, H paratype GAPEM 232335. All worms but E stained with methylene blue. Scale bars: 2 mm ( +A-E +); 20 +μm +( +F-H +). + + +Notopodia from BS2. In small worms, more or less similar, almost cylindrical; in large worms, anterior notopodia transversely flattened, those in first few anterior segments several times smaller than those that are most developed (Fig. 4). Largest specimens in each sample with about 30-40 segments with notopodia, the smallest with fewer, but even specimens ten or more times smaller than largest (by size) with over 30; the next 40-60 segments without notopodia, i.e. about 1/3-1/2 of body length without notopodial segments. Notochaetae with narrow brims (Fig. 11A). +Neuropodia from C3; tori increasing in size to U10, then becoming progressively smaller. Uncini in a single row, uncini of U1 with well-developed prow and crest with one tooth in profile (Fig. 4F, G); posterior uncini (U48) very similar (Fig. 4H). +Pygidium with crenulated margin, without cirri or papillae. + + +Differential diagnosis. + +Only one previously known species, +T. pascua +(Fauchald, 1977) from the Atlantic coast of Panama, has two pairs of branchiae and no eyespots. It differs from +T. davehalli +sp. n. in its lower number of branchial filaments: single filament in BS1 and BS2 in +T. pascua +; up to 20 filaments in BS1 and up to 10 filaments in +T. davehalli +. Only one previously known species, +T. hamatus +Moore, 1905 from Pacific Alaska, has two pairs of branchiae and segments of the posterior half of the body without notopodia. It differs from +T. davehalli +in the presence of eyespots and a lower number of branchial filaments: five in BS1 and BS2 in +T. hamatus +; up to 20 filaments in BS1 and up to 10 filaments in +T. davehalli +. +Thelepus davehalli +differs from the other species described in this paper and other known species with two pairs of branchiae in the presence of fully developed segments without notopodia in the posterior 1/3-1/2 of the body. + + +The last biramous parapodia of +Thelepus davehalli +is well developed (not reduced), following uniramous parapodia with well-developed neuropodia, contrary to other species described in this study (Fig. 4D, E). Anterior segments lack well-developed notopodia, contrary to those in +T. cincinnatus +and +T. marthae +. + + + +Remark. + +Thelepus cincinnatus var. andreanae +McIntosh, 1922 was described from within the range of +T. davehalli +. However, McIntosh clearly stated "Dorsal cephalic collar with eye-specks" while this new species has no eyespots. + + + +Etymology. +The species is named after my friend Mr. David Hall, Head of Marine and Freshwater Laboratories, Associate Director APEM Ltd., UK (Fig. 5). + +Figure 5. David Hall. The photograph was taken by his eldest daughter, Tara Hall. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/91/82/379182F366CCC2B0BB759F19B2C3F948.xml b/data/37/91/82/379182F366CCC2B0BB759F19B2C3F948.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1247b5d58e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/91/82/379182F366CCC2B0BB759F19B2C3F948.xml @@ -0,0 +1,3013 @@ + + + +A revision of the Old World Black Nightshades (Morelloid clade of Solanum L., Solanaceae) + + + +Author + +Saerkinen, Tiina +Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20 A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH 3 5 LR, United Kingdom +tsarkinen@rbge.org.uk + + + +Author + +Poczai, Peter +Botany Unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, P. O. Box 7, FI- 00014 Helsinki, Finland + + + +Author + +Barboza, Gloria E. +Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biologia Vegetal (CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Cordoba), Casilla de Correo 495, 5000 Cordoba, Argentina + + + +Author + +Weerden, Gerard M. van der +Experimental Garden, Radboud University, Faculty of Science Box 49, P. O. Box 9010, 6500 Nijmegen, The Netherlands + + + +Author + +Baden, Maria +Max-Planck Odense Center on the Biodemography of Aging and Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK- 5230 Odense M, Denmark + + + +Author + +Knapp, Sandra +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, United Kingdom +s.knapp@nhm.ac.uk + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2018 + +2018-07-25 + + +106 + + +1 +223 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.106.21991 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.106.21991 +1314-2003-106-1 +FF8BFFC82928FFA84734FFCB2E61E260 +1326005 + + + + +15. +Solanum scabrum Mill., Gard. Dict. ed. 8, no. 6. 1768 +Figures 46 +, 47 + + + + +Solanum nigrum L. var. guineense +L., Sp. Pl. 186. 1753. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. "Solanum guineense fructu magno instar cerasi nigerrimo umbellato" cultivated in England, at James +Sherard's +garden in Eltham (Hortus Elthamensis) (lectotype, designated by +Edmonds 1979b +, pg. 224: Dillenius, Hort. Eltham. 2: 366, t. 274, f. 354. 1732). + + +Solanum guineense +(L.) Mill., Gard. Dict., ed. 8, no. 7. 1768, nom. illeg., not +Solanum guineense +L. (1753) + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Based on +Solanum nigrum L. var. guineense +L. + + +Solanum melanocerasum +All., Auct. Syn. Meth. Stirp. Hort. Regii Taur. 664. 1774. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. "Solanum guineense, fructo magno, instar cerasi nigerrimo, umbellato" cultivated in England at John +Sherard's +garden in Eltham (Hortus Elthamensis), +Herb. Dillenius 336 +(neotype, designated by +Edmonds 2012 +, pg. 129 [as lectotype]: OXF [Dill. HE-274-234]). + + +Solanum guineense +(L.) Lam. Tabl. Encycl. 2: 18. 1794, nom. illeg., not +Solanum guineense +L. (1753), +Solanum guineense +(L.) Mill. (1768) + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Based on +Solanum nigrum L. var. guineense +L. + + +Solanum triangulare +Lam., Tabl. Encycl. 2: 18. 1794. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. "Ex Ind. Orient", +Herb. Lamarck s.n. +(lectotype, designated by + +D'Arcy +1974a + +, pg 735 [as type]: P-LAM [P00357626]). + + +Solanum quadrangulare Lam. var. triangulare +(Lam) Pers., Sys. 225. 1805. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Based on +Solanum triangulare +Lam. + + +Solanum melanocerasum +Willd., Enum. Pl. (Willdenow) 1: 237. 1809, nom. illeg., not +Solanum melanocerasum +All. (1773) + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Cultivated in Berlin Botanical Garden, from "Europa australi" [southern Europe] (no original material labelled as +"melanocerasum" +found in B-W; neotype, designated here: B-W [BW04368010]). + + +Solanum pterocaulum +Dunal, Hist. Nat. +Solanum +153. 1813, nom. illeg. superfl. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Based on +Solanum scabrum +Mill. (cited in synonymy). + + +Solanum fistulosum +Dunal, Encycl. [J. Lamarck & al.] Suppl. 3: 749. 1814. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. "Originaire de +l'Isle +de France [Mauritius], est +cultivee +en Amerique [Brazil]", +Herb. Richard s.n. +(lectotype, designated by + +D'Arcy +1974a + +, pg. 735: P [P00335259]). + + +Solanum memphiticum +Mart., Pl. Hort. Erlang. 63. 1814, nom. illeg., not +Solanum memphiticum +J.F.Gmel. (1791) + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Cultivated in Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany, origins not known (no specimens cited; no original material located, possibly at ER?). + + +Solanum nigrum L. var. melanocerasum +(Willd.) Dunal, Solan. Syn. 12. 1816. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Based on +Solanum melanocerasum +Willd. + + +Solanum nitens +Opiz, Oekon.-techn. Fl. +Boehm +. [Berchtold & al.] 3(2): XXI. 1843. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Czech Republic. Prague, "in Semubackern por dem Reuthore Prag", +P.M. Opiz 10/840 +(no herbaria cited; no original material found, perhaps at PR?). + + +Solanum oleraceum Dunal var. macrocarpum +Dunal, Prodr. [A. P. de Candolle] 13(1): 50. 1852. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Brazil. Bahia: Ilheus, 1841, +C.F.P. Martius 1255 +(lectotype, designated by +Edmonds 1972 +, pg. 108 [as holotype]: G-DC [G00144295]; isolectotype: P [P00366815]). + + +Solanum tinctorium +Welw., Apont. 590. 1859 [1858]. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Angola. Golungo Alto, 1856, +F.M.J. Welwitsch 6103 +(lectotype, designated here: BM [BM000942995]; isolectotypes: BM [BM000942996], K [K001029777]). + + +Solanum nigrum L. var. pterocaulum +(Dunal) Schur, Enum. Pl. Transsilv. 478. 1866, as ' +Solanum pterocaulon +'. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Based on +S. pterocaulum +Dunal ["excl. German floras"] + + +Solanum boerhaavii +Thell., Rep. Bot. Soc.& Exchange Club Brit. Isles 8: 187. 1927, as " +Boerhaavii +". + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Based on +Solanum nigrum L. var. guineense +L. [as replacement name for +Solanum guineense +(L.) Mill.] + + +Solanum nigrum L. var. pterocaulum +(Dunal) Domin, Biblioth. Bot. 89: 1127. 1928. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Based on +S. pterocaulum +Dunal + + +Solanum intrusum +Soria, Baileya 7: 33. 1959. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Based on (replacement name for) +Solanum nigrum L. var. guineense +L., and +Solanum guineense +(L.) Lam. + + +Solanum scabrum Mill. subsp. laevis +Olet, Novon 16(4): 510. 2006. + + +Solanum scabrum +Type. Uganda. Buganda: Kampala district, Kawempe div., Kawempe North, Kalerwe, Tula road, 1220 m, 14 Feb 2001, +E.A. Olet 88 +(holotype: MHU; isotypes: H, K, MO [ex descr.]). + + + + +Type +. + + + +Cultivated in Chelsea Physic Garden +, said in protologue to "grow naturally in North America", +Herb. Miller s.n. +( +lectotype +, designated by +Henderson 1974 +, pg. 61 [as type]: BM [BM000847083]) + +. + + + +Description. + +Annual or short-lived erect or ascending perennial herbs to 1.5 m tall, often woody at the base. Stems spreading, terete, ridged or winged, green to purple, if ridged or winged the stems later spinescent, older stems with or without prominent pseudospines, usually somewhat hollow; new growth puberulent with simple, spreading, uniseriate, translucent, eglandular trichomes, these 2-8-celled, 0.3-0.8 mm long; older stems glabrescent. Sympodial units difoliate, the leaves usually not geminate, but if leaves paired, then one is usually smaller. Leaves simple, 4-15(-20) cm long, 3-10(-16) cm wide, broadly ovate to elliptic, very variable in size depending on cultivars and growth conditions, membranous to somewhat fleshy, green to dark green to somewhat purple coloured above, slightly paler below, without smell; adaxial and abaxial surfaces glabrous or sparsely pubescent with simple uniseriate trichomes like those on the stem mainly along veins and scattered along lamina; major veins 3-6(-8) pairs, paler green or often purple tinged; base abruptly acute or truncate, narrowly winged on to the petiole; margins entire or rarely shallowly sinuate; apex rounded to acute; petioles 1-5(-8) cm long, glabrous or sparsely pubescent with simple uniseriate trichomes like those of the stem. Inflorescences 1-2(-4) cm long, internodal, simple, furcate or many times branched (in cultivars), sub-umbelliform, with 4-10(-30+) flowers clustered towards the tip(s) of the rhachis, glabrous or sparsely pubescent with simple uniseriate trichomes like those on the stem; peduncle 1-5(-8) cm long, erect and thick, much thickened at apex, subwoody; pedicels 0.4-1 cm long, 0.3-0.5 mm in diameter at the base, 0.75-0.9 mm in diameter at the apex, abruptly expanding to the calyx tube, stout, erect and/or spreading, articulated at the base; pedicel scars tightly clustered near the tip of the rhachis, spaced 0-2 mm apart, sometimes with short stumps ca. 0.5-1.0 mm long. Buds globose to subglobose, the corolla exserted 1/2-1/3 from the calyx tube before anthesis. Flowers 5-merous or occasionally fasciated and 6-7-merous in cultivars, all perfect. Calyx tube 0.9-1.1 mm long, abruptly cup-shaped with a broad base, the lobes slightly unequal, 0.9-1.5 mm long, 0.8-1.4 mm wide, broadly deltate with a rounded tip, green or purple-tinged, glabrous or sparsely pubescent with simple uniseriate trichomes like those of the pedicels, the margins often drying scarious and white. Corolla 7-12 mm in diameter, white, purple-tinged or occasionally lilac to dark purple, with a yellow basal star, stellate, lobed ca. 1/2 way to the base, the lobes 2.5-4 mm long, 1.5-3 mm wide, spreading or reflexed, densely papillate on tips and margins. Stamens equal; filament tube very short, to 0.1 mm long; free portion of the filaments 0.5-0.8 mm long, glabrous or pubescent with tangled uniseriate simple trichomes; anthers 2-3 mm long, ellipsoid or slightly tapering towards the tips, yellow, orange or brown, poricidal at the tips, the pores lengthening to slits with age and drying, the connective often becoming brownish-black in dry specimens. Ovary rounded, glabrous; style 2.5-5 mm long, densely pubescent with simple uniseriate trichomes 0.2-0.5 mm long in the basal 1/2 where included in the anther cone, exserted beyond anthers 0-1.5 mm; stigma capitate, the surface minutely papillate. Fruit a globose to depressed-globose berry, 10-20 mm in diameter, purplish-black at maturity, the pericarp thick, shiny or somewhat matte, not transparent; fruiting pedicels 0.7-1.5(-2.0) cm long, 0.5-1 mm in diameter at the base, 1.1-1.5 mm in diameter at the apex, stout, erect and spreading, purple or brown, usually not falling with the fruit, remaining on the plant and often persistent on older inflorescences; fruiting calyx not accrescent, the tube 1.5-2 mm long, usually tearing unevenly, the lobes 2-3 mm long, usually with thicker white margins in dry material, appressed or spreading to slightly reflexed. Seeds (20-)100-150 per berry, 2-2.8 mm long, 1.5-1.8 mm wide, flattened and tear-drop shaped with a subapical hilum, yellow-brown or purple, the surfaces minutely pitted, thin and the embryo clearly visible, the testal cells rectangular to pentagonal in outline. Stone cells absent. Chromosome number: +2n +=6x=72 ( +Soria and Heiser 1961 +[as + +S. melanocerasum + +]; +Heiser et al. 1965 +[as + +S. melanocerasum + +]; +Henderson 1974 +; +Edmonds 1977 +, +1983 +; +Symon 1981 +; +Jacoby and Labuschagne 2006 +; +Bukenya 1996 +; +Olet et al. 2015 +). + + + +Figure 46. + +Solanum scabrum + +A +Habit of wild form +B +Flower of wild form +C +Infructescence of wild form +D +Habit of cultivated form +E +Inflorescence of cultivated form +F +Fruit of cultivated form +G +Seed ( +A-C +Pilz 2108 +; +D-G +Nee 16088 +). Scale bar: 4 cm ( +A, D +), 3.3 mm ( +B +), 1.5 cm ( +C, F +), 7 mm ( +E +) and 2 mm ( +G +). Drawing by L. Smith. + + + + +Figure 47. + +Solanum scabrum + +A +Common habit +B +Habit in taller varieties +C +Flowers of the larger berried variety at full anthesis +D +Fruits of a larger berried variety +E +Flowers of the smaller berried variety at full anthesis +F +Fruits of a smaller berried variety ( +A +Nijmegen acc. BG13; +B +Nijmegen acc. A34750072; +C +Nijmegen acc. GB22; +D +Nijmegen acc. H065; +E +Nijmegen acc. A34750067; +F +Nijmegen acc. 2010/3). Photos by S. Knapp. + + + + +Distribution + +(Figure +48 +). Native to tropical Africa, but introduced worldwide as a cultivated plant. + + + +Figure 48. +Distribution of + +Solanum scabrum + +in its native range. + + + + +Ecology. +Grows in open areas, in a wide variety of habitats, in wet forests or drier areas, along roads and at field edges; often cultivated; between sea level and 2,300 m elevation. + + +Common names. + +Benin: odu, ogomo, feibii ( +Essou and Hermans 2006 +); Cameroon: houlohada, legume vert, njebanyoon, ossan, tindar noon, wikitiniho, zom/zoum; China: mu long kui ( +Zhang et al. 1994 +); +Cote +d'Ivoire +: foue; Equatorial Guinea: hierba mora, +nahu +, seba [Bubi people], sisa; Ghana: nsusua; Madagascar: anamamy, brede; Nigeria: awa ibo, gautan kaji, kumbi, odu, ogunmo, ugumakbe; +Sao +Tome e Principe: losua; Sierra Leone: a-kempa,borisuguli, filami, kemba, kembei, kholekoleden-na, magboli, reinpa, timbainyi; Slovenia: +cucoried +kovity +( + +Bertova +and +Goliasova +1993 + +); South Africa: nastagal; South Sudan. nzuobire; Tanzania: isonga (Kinyakyusa language); Uganda: eshwiga, eshwiga enzungu, kujikuji, nswiga ya kizungu; United Kingdom: garden huckleberry ( +Stace 2010 +). + + + +Uses. + +Leaves used as greens (spinach) and cooked, sold in markets; berries used as ink; in Benin, the powdered leaves are used to cure dysentery ( +Essou and Hermans 2006 +). + + + +Preliminary conservation status + +( +IUCN 2016 +). + +Solanum scabrum + +is widespread across Africa and an important leafy vegetable in cultivation; it can be assigned a preliminary status of LC (Least Concern; Table +7 +), but it may become important to conserve local populations in order to preserve genetic variation for plant breeding. + + + +Discussion. + + +Solanum scabrum + +is the most commonly cultivated and widespread of the African black nightshades. It is the most important indigenous leafy vegetable in the black nightshade group and is commonly known as the African nightshade ( +Edmonds and Chweya 1997 +; +Dinssa et al. 2016 +). + +Solanum scabrum + +shows great variation in growth form, leaf shape and size and berry number, in part due to the significant local variation introduced by human selection in cultivated populations. + + +The species has also been introduced to Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand. In the United States of America, + +S. scabrum + +is known as "Garden Huckleberry" and its identity, origin and suitability to human consumption were the subject of great interest in the 1960s (as + +S. guineense + +, e.g. +Soria and Heiser 1959 +, +1961 +; +Heiser 1969 +). + + +Different cultivars are recognised, the late flowering plants cultivated for their larger abundance of leaves with smaller number of fruits and earlier flowering plants that have larger inflorescences which are cultivated for their fruits ( +Manoko 2007 +). Cultivated forms of + +S. scabrum + +stand out as quite distinctive; all forms have larger flowers and anthers that are often brownish in colour, while the forms cultivated for their leaves have larger, longer petiolate leaves and those cultivated for their fruits have larger, more numerous and shinier berries (the size of cherries) on erect or spreading pedicels. The pericarp in + +S. scabrum + +berries in all varieties is quite thick compared to other black nightshades, but mature berries of cultivars show variation in anthocyanin content where some individuals have dark purple mesocarp and others pale green. One of the major limitations to cultivation of + +S. scabrum + +as a leaf vegetable is the relatively low leaf yield due to early flowering and excessive fruiting ( +Ojiewo et al. 2013 +; +Ojiewo et al. 2006 +). In response to this, enhanced varieties are being developed and new registered varieties are being released ( +Ojiewo et al. 2006 +; +Ojiewo et al. 2013 +) such as "Medium leaf long-lasting" released in Kenya in 2006. Breeding is also focussing on local variation and drought resistance ( +Dinssa et al. 2016 +). + + +The presumed wild forms were described at the infraspecific rank by +Olet et al. (2006) +as subsp. +Solanum scabrum laevis +. This differs from the cultivated forms in having narrower leaves and smaller fruits that are globose rather than subglobose. +Dehmer (2001) +and +Olet et al. (2011) +have shown, however, that these differences are not reflected in relationships based on AFLP molecular markers. These wild forms of + +S. scabrum + +have often been called + +S. nigrum + +(e.g. +Edmonds 2006a +, +2006b +, +2012 +), but they differ from true + +S. nigrum + +which, in Africa only occurs in the north along the Mediterranean, in their congested inflorescences, spreading pedicels, calyx lobes that tear unevenly and long-petiolate leaves. +Olet et al. (2011) +clearly demonstrated that the wild forms of + +S. scabrum + +are genetically closely related with cultivated + +S. scabrum + +accessions and form a distinct cluster away from European + +S. nigrum + +. + + + +Solanum scabrum + +can be distinguished from the somewhat similar + +S. americanum + +by its larger anthers (2-3 mm long versus 0.8-1.5 mm long). In both these species, as well as + +S. retroflexum + +, the berries usually lack stone cells (some populations of + +S. americanum + +can have up to 4 stone cells) and drop without the pedicels at maturity, leaving the pedicels behind on old inflorescences. In both + +S. scabrum + +and + +S. americanum + +, berries are purple-black and shiny, while + +S. retroflexum + +has dull purple-black berries with a distinct grey bloom. The pedicels of + +S. scabrum + +are usually erect or spreading. + + +Plants described as + +S. fistulosum + +and +S. oleraceum var. macrocarpon +by +Dunal (1814 +, +1852 +respectively, see synonymy) from Brazil were almost certainly taken there from western Africa by enslaved people and were either collected from home gardens or became established in the New world. + + + +Solanum scabrum + +is closely related to + +S. nigrum + +and + +S. villosum + +based on molecular data ( +Manoko 2007 +; + +Poczai and +Hyvoenen +2011 + +). The close relationship amongst these polyploids indicates that they might share the same diploid parent. The idea that + +S. villosum + +is the likely tetraploid parent of the hexaploids + +S. nigrum + +and + +S. scabrum + +has also been supported by evidence from crossing experiments and cytological studies ( +Soria and Heiser 1961 +; +Heiser et al. 1965 +; +Rao et al. 1971 +; +Jardine and Edmonds 1974 +; +Edmonds 1977 +, +1978 +; +Edmonds and Glidewell 1977 +; +Edmonds 1978 +). Two possibilities still remain: one of the hexaploid species ( + +S. nigrum + +and + +S. scabrum + +) evolved first and gave rise to the other or that the two hexaploids originated from the same parents independently ( + +Poczai and +Hyvoenen +2011 + +). These two scenarios will be difficult to distinguish based on molecular data due to the complexity caused by high ploidy level. + + +The nomenclature and typification of the various synonyms of + +S. scabrum + +and the earliest name applied to the taxon, have been extensively discussed by others (e.g. +Gras 1863 +; +Thellung 1927 +; + +Polgar +1939 + +; +Stebbins and Paddock 1949 +; +Soria and Heiser 1959 +; +Heine 1960 +; +Edmonds 1979b +). We merely add additional notes for our lectotypifications designated here or for those that have been designated inadvertently (e.g. +Prado et al. 2015 +). + + +Edmonds (2012) +designated a specimen in the Dillenian herbarium at OXF as the lectotype for + +S. melanocerasum + +All.; Allioni did not cite and probably never saw these specimens; this is correctable to neotype. + + + +D'Arcy +(1974a + +: 737) inadvertently lectotypifed + +S. guineense + +Lam. by citing a specimen in "Herb. +Lam. s.n. +(P)" as +"Type" +; this corresponds to a specimen in the Lamarck herbarium (P00357674) that is labelled "Solanum nigrum guineense L. planta glabra.. fructu magno nigro. Sol. guineense Lam. Ill", suggesting that Lamarck was basing his name on +Linnaeus' +S. nigrum var. guineense +. In the protologue, +Lamarck (1794) +indirectly referred to Linnaeus, through citing the single element in the protologue of +S. nigrum var. guineense +, the illustration in +Dillenius (1732) +. We are therefore treating these two names ( +S. nigrum var. guineense +L. and + +S. guineense + +Lam.) as homotypic, rendering + +D'Arcy's +(1974a) + +lectotypification superfluous. + + + +Lamarck's +(1794) + + +S. triangulare + +has traditionally been considered a synonym of + +S. africanum + +Mill. (a member of the Dulcamaroid clade, +Knapp 2013 +); the protologue cites two elements, only one of which +"?" +represents + +S. africanum + +and was questioned as only possibly being the same by Lamarck. The other cited element of + +S. triangulare + +is an illustration from +Herbarium Amboinense +( +Rumphius 1750 +) that represents + +S. americanum + +. + +D'Arcy +(1974a) + +, however, cited the specimen in +Lamarck's +herbarium ("Lamarck s.n. (P)"; P00357626) as +"Type" +and we must accept this as a valid lectotypification. This specimen is of a narrow-leaved plant of + +S. scabrum. + + + +Willdenow (1809) +did not specifically reference +Allioni's +epithet in his protologue, so we are treating it as a new name. There is no material in the Willdenow herbarium labelled as + +S. melanocerasum + +, but a specimen (B-W04368010) of + +S. scabrum + +(labelled as "S. guineense" and "ex horto proprio W") was clearly grown in Berlin and seen by Willdenow. We designate this as the neotype for + +S. melanocerasum + +Willd. + + + +Solanum pterocaulum + +is illegitimate because +Dunal (1813) +cited + +S. scabrum + +in synonymy. In the + +Prodromus + +( +Dunal 1852 +), his use of ' + +Solanum pterocaulon + +' was simply an orthographic variant and is correctable (see +McNeill et al.. 2012 +, Art. 61.5 and associated provisions in Art. 61); it does not alter the legitimacy of the name. + + +No original material has been traced for + +S. memphiticum + +Mart., but the emphasis placed on the dark purplish colour of the stems and leaves by +Martius (1814) +in the protologue, coupled with the petiolate nature of the leaves and the erect peduncles, suggests this plant was + +S. scabrum. + + + +Of the several species in this group described by P.M. Opiz (see discussion under + +S. nigrum + +), we are convinced from the description that + +S. nitens + +is a synonym of + +S. scabrum + +, rather than of + +S. nigrum + +, although +Opiz (1843) +places it in his +"superspecies" + +S. nigrum + +. The mention of shiny berries on erect pedicels is distinctive; we have yet to confirm this with specimens from +Opiz's +herbarium at PR. + + +The lectotype (G00144295) chosen for +S. oleraceum var. macrocarpum +is the better preserved of the two duplicates of +Martius 1225 +cited by +Dunal (1852) +. + + +The lectotype chosen for + +S. tinctorium + +( +Welwitsch 6103 +) is the more clearly duplicated of the collections cited in the protologue; we have selected the best preserved sheet (BM000942995) as the lectotype. The name apparently comes from the staining berries that were used as ink. + + + +Selected specimens examined. + + + +Angola + +. + +Bengo + +: +Ambriz +, +Abriz +, +Dec 1872 +, + +Monteiro +s.n. + +(K) + +; + + +Benguela + +: +Hochland +zwischen Ganda und Caconda +, +Dec 1933 +, + +Hundt +797 + +(BM) + +; + + +Cuanza Norte + +: +Varzea do Isidoro +ad rivum +Cuango +, +Dto. Golungo Alto +, +Jul 1855 +, + +Welwitsch +6100 + +(BM) + +; + + +Malanje + +: +Distr. Pungo Andongo +, prope +Lusillo +, +Jan 1857 +, + +Welwitsch +6108 + +(BM) + +; + + +Namibe + +: +Mofsamedes +, +Herb. Moira +, +Habit Cavalheiros +, +Jul 1859 +, + +Welwitsch +6033 + +(BM) + +. + + + + +Benin + +. + +Atlantique + +: +Wida +, +Dahomey +, +26 Aug 1903 +, + +Esteve +111 + +(BM) + +. + + + + +Botswana + +. + +Ghanzi + +: +Ghanzi +camp, +4 May 1969 +, +Brown 6019 +(K); Ghanzi camp, +4 May 1969 +, +Cole 6019 +(K) + +; + + +North West + +: +Mutsoi +NE of Nokaneng +, +21 Mar 1967 +, +Lambrecht 90 +(K) + +. + + + + +Burkina Faso + +. + +Seno + +: +Dori Dam +, +16 Oct 2007 +, + +Sanou +& +Leonard +BUR-596 + +(K) + +. + + + + +Cameroon + +. + +Adamaoua + +: +Mayo-Banyo +, +Mambilla Plateau Cameroon +, around +Somie village +, +21 Jun 2009 +, + +Komaromi +48 + +(K) + +; + + +Centre + +: +Mimboman area +, +Yaounde +, +16 Sep 1986 +, + +Manning +235 + +(MO) + +; + + +Extreme-Nord + +: +Monts Mandara +, +Hossere Oupay +, + +15 km +NNO de Mokolo + +, +15 Sep 1964 +, + +Letouzey +6880 + +(K, P) + +; + + +Littoral + +: +Donala +, +16 Aug 1986 +, + +Johns +86-481 + +(K) + +; + + +Nord-Ouest + +: +Mezam +, +Above Bamenda +, +20 Jan 1928 +, + +Migeod +358 + +(BM, K) + +; + + +Sud-Ouest + +: +Mt Kupe +, +Kupe Village +, +24 May 1996 +, + +Ryan +289 + +(K, MO, P) + +. + + + + +Central African Republic + +. Mboukou Griko, +Territoire du Haut-Obangi +, +24 Sep 1902 +, +Chevalier 5518 +(K) + +. + + + + +Comoros + +. + +Anjouan + +: +Anjouan +(Comoro-Insel Johanna), +Jun 1875 +, +Hildebrandt 1626[b +] (BM, W) + +; + + +Moheli Island + +: +Moheli +, NE center of island, +14 Aug 1987 +, + +D'Arcy +17617 + +(MO, P); +1 Nov 1990 +, + +D'Arcy +17765 + +(MO); + +Njazidja + +: +Grande Comore +, +9 Aug 1981 +, +Doutrelepont 1203 +(MO, P) + +. + + + + + +Cote +d'Ivoire + + +. + +Abidjan + +: +Adjame +, +31 May 1973 +, + +De Koning +1747 + +(MO) + +; + + +Dimbokro + +: c. +5 km +W of +Dimbokro +, +13 Oct 1975 +, + +van der Burg +1177 + +(MO); + +M'Bahiakro + +: Koffi-Akakro (s. Prikro), +25 Jul 1973 +, + +Smittenberg-Visser +61 + +(MO) + +; + + +Montagnes + +: +Man +, +6 km +N nr +Yebegouin +, +27 Jan 1984 +, + +Hepper + +& + +Maley +7849 + +(K) + +. + + + + +Democratic Republic of the Congo + +. + +Katanga + +: +Lukonzolwa +, +Moero +, 1933, + + +Quarre + +3297 + +(K); +Kongolo +, +5 Feb 1920 +, +Schantz 646 +(K) + +; + + +Kinshasa + +: +Maluku +, +Route Menkao-Kingankati +, +5 Nov 1971 +, +Breyne 2227 +(MO) + +; + +Nord-Kivu + +: Lubarika, 1953, +Gilon 315[a +] (MO); + + +Orientale + +: +Ituri +, w. +v. Albert-See +, +Oct 1934 +, +Gusinde s.n. +(W); Yangambi, +26 Jul 1938 +, +Louis 10507 +(K, P); + +Sud + +Kivu +: +Kizozi +, +Jul 1933 +, +Lejeune 55 +(K) + + + +. + + + + +Egypt + +. + +Giza + +: +Faculty of Agriculture +, +Giza +, +13 Jun 1971 +, +Sisi s.n. +(MO) + +. + + + + +Equatorial Guinea + +. +Annobon +: +Pico de Fogo, SW +side, +25 Jul 1959 +, + +Melville +188 + +(BM, K, MA, P) + +; + + +Bioko + +: +entre Moca y Riaba +por el camino viejo, +20 Feb 1989 +, + + +Fernandez-Casas + +11820 + +(K, MA, MO, P) + +; + + +Bioko Norte + +: + +Pico +Basile + +, +Carretera +del pico +Basile +, +28 Mar 1990 +, + +Do Carvalho +4305 + +(K, MA, MO, P) + +; + + +Bioko Sur + +: +Moca +, camino +de Ureca +, +18 Feb 1989 +, + + +Fernandez-Casas + +11725 + +(K, MA, MO) + +. + + + + +Eritrea + +. + +Maekel + +: +Asmara +, +1 May 1892 +, + +Terracciano + +& + +Pappi +187 [2206 + +] (FT) + +; + + +Semienawi Keyih Bahri + +: +Asmara +, +Beless +, +Hamasen +, +4 May 1892 +, + +Terracciano + +& + +Pappi +2536 + +(FT) + +. + + + + +Gabon + +. + +Estuaire + +: +Jardin Cenarest +, +Libreville +, +Poubelle +, +16 Jan 1986 +, +Louis 1990 +(MO) + +. + + + + +Ghana +. +Ashanti + +: nr +Mampong +, +Ashanti +, +7 Aug 1963 +, + +Darko +5115 + +(K) + +; + + +Central + +: +Aswansi, W.P +, +12 Oct 1954 +, + +Darko +1032 + +(K) + +; + + +Eastern + +: +Akosombo +, +25 May 1970 +, + +Enti +1723 + +(MO); Akwapim, Mampong Scarp, +14 Jun 1953 +, + +Morton +s.n. + +(K) + +; + + +Greater Accra + +: +Accra +, +May 1961 +, + +Irvine +5095 + +(K) + +; + + +Volta + +: +Adzido +, +Keta +, +16 Sep 1960 +, + +Akpabla +2117 + +(K) + +. + + + + +Guinea + +. + + +Nzerekore + + +: +Lola +, +Mt. Nimba +, +1 Nov 2012 +, + +Diabate + +& + +Mas +1419 + +(MO) + +. + + + + +Indonesia + +. + +Java + +: +Central Java +, +Mt. Slamet +, +15 Mar 2004 +, +Hoover et al. 89 +(A); +Seram +: +Manusela National Park +, +12 Sep 1987 +, + +Argent C +87-179 + +(A, E) + +; + + +Sumatra + +: E of +Berastagi +, +Karo Highlands +, +4 Jun 1928 +, + +Si Toroes +407 + +(A, GH) + +. + + + + +Lesotho + +. +Sehlabathebe +, +4 Jan 1973 +, +Bayliss 5476 +(MO) + +. + + + + +Liberia + +. + +Central + +: + +3 mi +NE of Suacoco + +, +Gbarnga +, +7 Feb 1951 +, + +Daniel +117 + +(B, BM, MO) + +; + + +Grand Gedeh + +: +Tchien +, +Mim Timber Co +( +Fijnhout +), +16 May 1970 +, + +de Koning +519 + +(MO) + +; + + +Lofa + +: mi along rd to +Wologesi +, +15 Jul 1970 +, + +Jansen +2015 + +(K, MO, P) + +; + + +Nimba + +: +Nimba Mountains +, +27 Jul 1962 +, + +Leeuwenberg + +& + +Voorhoeve +4668 + +(B, K, MO, P) + +. + + + + +Madagascar + +. + +Antananarivo + +: +Grande Terre-Ouangani +, +Apendzo-Jivany. Barakani +, +7 May 2002 +, +Barthelat et al. 885 +(K, MO, P) + +; + + +Antsiranana + +: + +Mt. +d'Ambre + +, partie centrale, +Prov. Diego-Suarez +, +11 Nov 2007 +, +Gautier 5198 +(K, MO) + +; + + +Fianarantsoa + +: +Ankafana +, 1880, + +Cowan +s.n. + +(BM); + +10 km +W of Ivato on Route + +35, +25 Jan 1975 +, +Croat 29606 +(MO) + +; + + +Toamasina + +: au km 26 de la route +de Tamatave +, +18 Oct 1951 +, +Benoist 147 +(P) + +; + + +Toliara + +: +Beroroha +, + + +Vallee +du Mangoky + + +et de +l' +Isahaina +aux environs +de Beroroha +, +Oct 1933 +, +Humbert 11309 +(K, MO, P); Andohahela RNI, +Mt. Trafonaomby +, Taolagnaro, +7 Apr 1994 +, +Randriamampionona 692 +(MO, P) + +. + + + + +Malawi + +. +Central +: +Salima Distr. +, +Liganga village +A. Mpemba +, +14 Jun 1985 +, +Kwatha et al. 210 +(MO); +Salima Distr. +, Luwadzi stream, +14 Jun 1985 +, +Salubeni et al. 4242 +(MO) + +; + +Northern +: +Nkhata Bay +, +Musalowa village +, +Chizumulu Island +, +25 Mar 1989 +, + +Balaka + +& +Patel 2025 +(K, MO) + +; + + +Southern + +: +Malawe Hill +, W of +Port Herald +, +23 Mar 1960 +, +Phipps 2653 +(K, MO) + +. + + + + +Mauritania + +. + +Trarza + +: +Rosso Administrative area +, +Village Rosso +, +9 Oct 1962 +, +Adam 18728 +(MO) + +. + + + + +Mozambique + +. + +Baroma + +: +N'kanya +, N of +Zambesi River +, +25 Jul 1950 +, +Chase 2857 +(BM) + +; + + +Cabo Delgado + +: +Pemba +, +Jun 1909 +, +Rogers 8256 +(K) + +; + + +Manica + +: +Lower +slopes of +Chimanimani Mountains +, +Apr 1967 +, +Westwater 192954 +(K) + +. + + + + +Namibia + +. +Onjossariviers +, im +Ufergestrupp +, +21 Jun 1957 +, +Seydel 1162 +(A, K) + +. + + + + +New Zealand + +. +North Island +: +Bay of Plenty +, +Ohope +, +Whakatane Ecological Region +, +Taneatua Ecological District +, +13 Mar 1979 +, +Grant s.n. +(AK) + +. + + + + +Nigeria + +. + +Delta + +: [ +Ogwashi-Ukwu +], +25 Nov 1912 +, + +Thomas +2042 + +(K) + +; + + +Edo + +: +Nikrowa Forest Reserve +, +Mid-west State +, +Iyekovia Distr. +, +8 Oct 1973 +, + +Daramola +FHI-72483 + +(K, MO) + +; + + +Enugu + +: + +10 mi +E of Erugu + +, +Mar 1948 +, + +Irvine +3607 + +(K) + +; + + +Gongola + +: +Gemu Distr. +, +Mambilla +plateau, +18 Aug 1977 +, + +Fagbemi +438 + +(MO) + +; + + +Jos + +: +Naraguta +, + +Lely +31 + +(K) + +; + + +Kaduna + +: +Zaria +, 1975, + +Magaji +MG-725 + +(K) + +; + + +Kano + +: +Kano +, +Wudil Distr +, +50 km +SE of the city of +Kano +, +16 Mar 1988 +, + +Etkin +63[b + +] (MO) + +; + + +Kogi + +: +Odu, SW +Nigeria +, + +Van Eyenhuisen +7 + +(K) + +; + + +Lagos + +: +Lagos +, + +Dalziel +1188a + +(K); +Lagos +, + +Dalziel +1188b + +(K) + +; + + +Niger + +: +Nupe +, +Barter 1054 +(K, P) + +; + + +Ondo + +: between +Ikare +and +Oke-Agbe +, +Ikare District +, +2 May 1979 +, + +Daramola + +& + +Osanyinlusi +154 + +(K) + +; + + +Oyo + +: +Ibadan +, + +7 km +W of Polytechnic + +, +11 Jun 1977 +, + +Pilz +2108 + +(K, MO) + +; + + +Taraba + +: +State of Gongola +, +Distr. Mambilla Plateau +, +Nguroje township +, +23 May 1982 +, + +Odewo +130 + +(MO) + +. + + + + + +Sao +Tome e Principe + + +. +Bom Sucesso +, +27 Jan 1949 +, + +Espirito +Santo 218 + +(BM); Vanhulst ( +Macambrara +), +28 Oct 1932 +, +Exell 89 +(BM) + +. + + + +Senegal + +. In paludilb[us] +N'Boro +nec non ins[ula] Bonavista, 1838, +Brunner 108 +(BM, G, W); Sin. loc., 1828, +Perrottet 555 +(BM, W); +Perrottet 556 +(BM); + + + + +Seychelles + +. +Morne Blanc +, +2 Oct 1970 +, +Schlieben 11670 +(B, K) + +. + + + +Sierra Leone + +. +Eastern +: Kailahun, Musaia, +19 Dec 1946 +, +Deighton 4571 +(K); +Northern +: Port Loko, Rokupr, Magbema, +18 Apr 1959 +, +Jordan +, +1059 +(K); Yonibana, +12 Nov 1914 +, +Thomas 4909 +(W); +Western +: Freetown, +28 Apr 1965 +, +Morton s.n. +(K). + + + + +South Africa +. +Eastern Cape + +: +Grahamstown +, +7 Sep 1970 +, + +Bayliss +4594 + +(A) + +; + + +KwaZulu-Natal + +: 2632 +CD Bella Vista +grid, between +Ndumu Store +and the +Game Reserve +, +30 Oct 1969 +, + +Moll +4138 + +(A, K) + +; + + +Limpopo + +: +Mopani +, +Shiluvane +, +Aug 1899 +, + +Junod +575 + +(K) + +; + + +North West + +: +Okawango Delta +, +Okavango Delta +, +Delta +camp, +16 Jun 1994 +, + +Cole +923 + +(K) + +; + + +Northern Cape + +: +Augrabies Falls National Park +, +Orange river +bank, +14 Mar 1978 +, + +Balsinhas + +& + +Harding +3290 + +(K, MO) + +; + + +Western Cape + +: +Dowweklip +, +Voelklip +, +Hermanus +, +6 Jun 1980 +, + +Williams +287 + +(K, MO); +Skeleton Ravine +, +3 Oct 1897 +, + +Wolley-Dod +3180 + +(K) + +. + + + + +South Sudan + +. +Bahr El Ghazal +: Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, +Bahr El Ghazal Prov. +, Ibba, +10 Mar 1934 +, +Dandy 624 +(BM, EA) + +; + + +Equatoria + +: +R. Napere +, +25 Nov 1937 +, +Wyld 347 +(BM) + +. + + + + +Tanzania + +. + +Dodoma + +: +Mpwapwa +, +Mbuga Village +, +Kibakwe Division +, +Mbuga Ward +, +31 May 2005 +, + +Kindeketa +et al. 2549 + +(EA, MO) + +; + + +Iringa + +: +Ruaha National Park +, FTEA region T7, top of +Mpululu mountain +, +21 May 1968 +, + +Renvoize + +& + +Abdallah +2312 + +(EA, K) + +; + + +Kagera + +: +Bukoba +, +30 Oct 1992 +, + +Breteler +11599 + +(MO) + +; + + +Mbeya + +: +Rungwe +, +Ngumbulu Village, NE +part of +Rungwe Forest Reserve +, +14 Mar 2008 +, + +Abeid +et al. 2848 + +(MO) + +; + + +Morogoro + +: +Tanganyika +, +Ulugurus +, +Jan 1935 +, + +Bruce +524 + +(BM, K) + +; + + +Shinyanga + +: +Shinyanga +, +Nov 1938 +, + +Koritschoner +2191 + +(EA, K) + +. + + + + +Togo + +. + +Lome + +, +22 Sep 1976 +, +Ern et al. 883 +(B); slopes of Bauman Peak, +14 Aug 1962 +, + +Morton A +4277 + +(MO) + +. + + + + +Uganda + +. + +Central + +: +Kyadondo Mengo +(U4); +Nr Kanyanya +, +16 Jun 1990 +, + +Rwaburindore +2992 + +(MO) + +; + + +Mengo + +: +Distr. +W. +Mengo +, + +4 mi +Gayaza + +rd, +5 Jul 1980 +, + +Rwaburindore +701 + +(MO) + +; + +Northern +: +Yumbe +, +26 Nov 1941 +, + +Thomas +4070 + +(EA, K) + +; + + +Western + +: +Kigezi +DFI, +28 Aug 1972 +, + +Goode G +3-72 + +(K); +Kigezi +, +Bugangari +, +Rhuzumbura +, +Kigezi +, +Feb 1949 +, + +Purseglove +2712 + +(EA, K) + +. + + + + +United Kingdom +. England + +: +Hertfordshire +, +Rye Meads Sewage Works +, nr +Rye House +, +1 Oct 1996 +, +Hanson s.n. +(K) + +. + + + + +Zimbabwe + +. + +Mashonaland Central + +: +Imayanga +, +Nyamaropa +TTk, +16 Jan 1967 +, +Biegel 1767 +(MO) + +; + + +Matabeleland North + +: +Binga Distr. +, +Sanyam R. +and +Zambezi R. +confluence, +Sep 1955 +, +Davies 1514 +(MO) + +; + + +Matabeleland North + +: +Binga +, +Chizarira Game Reserve +, +Busi River +, +10 Nov 1971 +, +Thomson 481 +(K); +Wankie +: +Wankie Distr. +, +Victoria Falls +, Elephant Hills Hotel, +19 Dec 1978 +, +Mshasha 144 +(MO) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/93/44/379344876B2917CD721F1DCFCFBE4D8B.xml b/data/37/93/44/379344876B2917CD721F1DCFCFBE4D8B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5d73cef0fc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/93/44/379344876B2917CD721F1DCFCFBE4D8B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,342 @@ + + + +Notes on Shore Flies (Diptera: Ephydridae) from Finland and north-western Russia + + + +Author + +Kahanpaeae, Jere + + + +Author + +Zatwarnicki, Tadeusz + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +4701 +4701 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4701 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4701 +1314-2828--4701 + + + + +Parydra (Chaetoapnea) mitis (Cresson, 1930) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +http://id.luomus.fi/GV.16564 +; recordedBy: +Albrecht, Anders +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; Taxon: scientificName: Parydramitis (Cresson, 1930); order: Diptera; family: Ephydridae; genus: Parydra; specificEpithet: mitis; scientificNameAuthorship: (Cresson, 1930); Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: U; municipality: Sipoo; locality: + +Sjoeskog + +; verbatimCoordinates: 6690:3385; geodeticDatum: wgs84; georeferencedBy: +Kahanpaeae +, Jere; Identification: identifiedBy: +Zatwarnicki, T. +; Event: year: 1975; month: 5; day: 6; Record Level: institutionCode: +MZH +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +http://id.luomus.fi/GV.16565 +; recordedBy: +Tiensuu, Lauri +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; Taxon: scientificName: Parydramitis (Cresson, 1930); order: Diptera; family: Ephydridae; genus: Parydra; specificEpithet: mitis; scientificNameAuthorship: (Cresson, 1930); Location: country: +Russia +; municipality: Vaaseni; geodeticDatum: wgs84; georeferencedBy: +Kahanpaeae +, Jere; Identification: identifiedBy: +Zatwarnicki, T. +; Event: year: 1942; month: 5; day: 2; Record Level: institutionCode: +MZH +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +http://id.luomus.fi/GV.16566 +; recordedBy: +Tiensuu, Lauri +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; Taxon: scientificName: Parydramitis (Cresson, 1930); order: Diptera; family: Ephydridae; genus: Parydra; specificEpithet: mitis; scientificNameAuthorship: (Cresson, 1930); Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: U; municipality: Helsinki; locality: +Herttoniemi +; geodeticDatum: wgs84; georeferencedBy: +Kahanpaeae +, Jere; Identification: identifiedBy: +Zatwarnicki, T. +; Event: year: 1945; month: 5; day: 16; Record Level: institutionCode: +MZH +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +http://id.luomus.fi/GV.16567 +; recordedBy: +Tiensuu, Lauri +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; Taxon: scientificName: Parydramitis (Cresson, 1930); order: Diptera; family: Ephydridae; genus: Parydra; specificEpithet: mitis; scientificNameAuthorship: (Cresson, 1930); Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: EK; municipality: Vehkalahti; geodeticDatum: wgs84; georeferencedBy: +Kahanpaeae +, Jere; Identification: identifiedBy: +Zatwarnicki, T. +; Event: year: 1945; month: 4; day: 9; Record Level: institutionCode: +MZH +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +http://id.luomus.fi/GV.16568 +; recordedBy: +Tiensuu, Lauri +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; Taxon: scientificName: Parydramitis (Cresson, 1930); order: Diptera; family: Ephydridae; genus: Parydra; specificEpithet: mitis; scientificNameAuthorship: (Cresson, 1930); Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: U; municipality: Helsinki; locality: +Herttoniemi +; geodeticDatum: wgs84; georeferencedBy: +Kahanpaeae +, Jere; Identification: identifiedBy: +Zatwarnicki, T. +; Event: year: 1945; month: 5; day: 16; Record Level: institutionCode: +MZH +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +http://id.luomus.fi/GV.16569 +; recordedBy: + +Lundstroem +, Carl + +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; Taxon: scientificName: Parydramitis (Cresson, 1930); order: Diptera; family: Ephydridae; genus: Parydra; specificEpithet: mitis; scientificNameAuthorship: (Cresson, 1930); Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: PS; municipality: Maaninka; locality: +Tuovilanlahti +; geodeticDatum: wgs84; georeferencedBy: +Kahanpaeae +, Jere; Identification: identifiedBy: +Zatwarnicki, T. +; Event: year: 1865; Record Level: institutionCode: +MZH +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +http://id.luomus.fi/GV.16570 +; recordedBy: +Frey, Richard +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; Taxon: scientificName: Parydramitis (Cresson, 1930); order: Diptera; family: Ephydridae; genus: Parydra; specificEpithet: mitis; scientificNameAuthorship: (Cresson, 1930); Location: country: +Russia +; stateProvince: Republic of Carelia; municipality: +Paanajaervi +; locality: +behind Takalo farm +; decimalLatitude: +66.26 +; decimalLongitude: +29.78 +; geodeticDatum: wgs84; georeferencedBy: +Kahanpaeae +, Jere; Identification: identifiedBy: +Zatwarnicki, T. +; Event: year: 1939; month: 17; day: 6; habitat: lake shore; Record Level: institutionCode: +MZH +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +http://id.luomus.fi/GV.16571 +; recordedBy: + +Stora +, Ragnar + +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; Taxon: scientificName: Parydramitis (Cresson, 1930); order: Diptera; family: Ephydridae; genus: Parydra; specificEpithet: mitis; scientificNameAuthorship: (Cresson, 1930); Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: KP; municipality: Uusikaarlepyy; geodeticDatum: wgs84; georeferencedBy: +Kahanpaeae +, Jere; Identification: identifiedBy: +Zatwarnicki, T. +; Event: year: 1954; Record Level: institutionCode: +MZH +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +http://id.luomus.fi/GV.16572 +; recordedBy: +Frey, Richard +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; Taxon: scientificName: Parydramitis (Cresson, 1930); order: Diptera; family: Ephydridae; genus: Parydra; specificEpithet: mitis; scientificNameAuthorship: (Cresson, 1930); Location: country: +Russia +; stateProvince: Republic of Carelia; municipality: +Paanajaervi +; locality: +hotel +; geodeticDatum: wgs84; georeferencedBy: +Kahanpaeae +, Jere; Identification: identifiedBy: +Zatwarnicki, T. +; Event: year: 1939; month: 7; day: 6; Record Level: institutionCode: +MZH +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +http://id.luomus.fi/GV.16573 +; recordedBy: + +Stora +, Ragnar + +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; Taxon: scientificName: Parydramitis (Cresson, 1930); order: Diptera; family: Ephydridae; genus: Parydra; specificEpithet: mitis; scientificNameAuthorship: (Cresson, 1930); Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: KP; municipality: Uusikaarlepyy; geodeticDatum: wgs84; georeferencedBy: +Kahanpaeae +, Jere; Identification: identifiedBy: +Zatwarnicki, T. +; Event: year: 1954-1955; Record Level: institutionCode: +MZH +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +http://id.luomus.fi/GV.16574 +; recordedBy: +Frey, Richard +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +adult +; Taxon: scientificName: Parydramitis (Cresson, 1930); order: Diptera; family: Ephydridae; genus: Parydra; specificEpithet: mitis; scientificNameAuthorship: (Cresson, 1930); Location: country: +Finland +; stateProvince: U; municipality: Helsinki; locality: +Munkkiniemi +; geodeticDatum: wgs84; georeferencedBy: +Kahanpaeae +, Jere; Identification: identifiedBy: +Zatwarnicki, T. +; Event: year: 1941; month: 5; day: 4; habitat: a herb-rich forest with a stream; Record Level: institutionCode: +MZH +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Distribution + +First recorded from Finland by + +Zatwarnicki and +Kahanpaeae +(2014) + +. Widespread in Europe, it is also found in North Africa ( +Zatwarnicki 2013 +). The illustrated record by + +Kahanpaeae +(2013) + +represents +Parydra nigritarsis +Strobl, 1893. + + + +Notes +Fig. 3c illustrates specimen http://id.luomus.fi/GV.16525. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/93/46/3793465A0330858AC325E1BBD78C0A2C.xml b/data/37/93/46/3793465A0330858AC325E1BBD78C0A2C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..93c94f03481 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/93/46/3793465A0330858AC325E1BBD78C0A2C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Orobanchaceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +938 +970 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Euphrasia pectinata + +Ten. + + + + +Artbeschreibung: Unterscheidet sich von + +E. stricta + +durch folgende Merkmale: +Staengel +unverzweigt oder mit einzelnen Zweigen, stets + +ohne +Druesen +, obere +Blaetter +mindestens so breit wie lang, kurz abstehend behaart + +, +Deckblaetter +am Grund +keilfoermig +, +Blueten +etwas +groesser +, Frucht 3-4mal so lang wie breit. + + + + +Bluetezeit +: 5-8 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz: Trockenrasen, +Foehrenwaelder +/ kollin-subalpin / AS, sonst vereinzelt + + + +Verbreitung global: Eurasiatisch + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl L--Salzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl T--
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +--
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Kamm-Augentrost +Nom +francais +: + +Euphraise +pectinee + +Nome italiano: +Eufrasia pettinata + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/94/20/379420020B229457A7804818A51435B1.xml b/data/37/94/20/379420020B229457A7804818A51435B1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e8a731f5884 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/94/20/379420020B229457A7804818A51435B1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Braconidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Mark R. + + + +Author + +Godfray, H. Charles J. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8151 +8151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 +1314-2828-4-8151 + + + + +Hormius Nees, 1818 + + + + +CHLIDONIA +Herrich-Schaeffer +, 1838 + + +HORMIELLUS +Enderlein, 1912 + + +MEDIELLA +Hedqvist, 1963 + + +ANHORMIUS +Belokobylskij, 1989 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/94/3C/37943CDAD957F40BAE655019F5DD2836.xml b/data/37/94/3C/37943CDAD957F40BAE655019F5DD2836.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..163a6e711a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/94/3C/37943CDAD957F40BAE655019F5DD2836.xml @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@ + + + +Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 2. Nymphaceae bis Primulaceae (2 nd edition) (p. 956): Leguminosae + + + +Author + +Hess, Hans Ernst + + + +Author + +Landolt, Elias + + + +Author + +Hirzel, Rosmarie + +text + +1976 +Birkhaeuser Verlag + + +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.292251 + +book +292251 +10.5281/zenodo.292251 +3-7643-0527-4 + + + +<subSubSection id="93E3BF3403E91B5EBFC5A0FB342B31D9" pageId="null" pageNumber="584" type="nomenclature"> +<paragraph id="6BB7F2335D4F628282FFA5169C8BE578" pageId="null" pageNumber="584"> +<taxonomicName id="B7A8CF70B51BF57C263E9D5E12BE8E00" authority="Ten." authorityName="Ten." class="Magnoliopsida" family="Fabaceae" genus="Vicia" kingdom="Plantae" order="Fabales" pageId="null" pageNumber="584" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="dasycarpa"> +Vicia +<normalizedToken id="50933A656153421DC308D74E6811610C" originalValue="dasycárpa" pageId="null" pageNumber="584">dasycarpa</normalizedToken> +Ten. +</taxonomicName> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="E5FF42D48359FC3DC7692FECF83CB0F3" pageId="null" pageNumber="584" type="reference_group"> +<paragraph id="E2A0B10895D5AF1ADDC2FA0CE390399D" pageId="null" pageNumber="584"> +( +<taxonomicName id="D7199D4905D96D8DA1D310A6ADA325CB" authority="Host" authorityName="Host" class="Magnoliopsida" family="Fabaceae" genus="Coronilla" kingdom="Plantae" order="Fabales" pageId="null" pageNumber="584" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="varia"> +<emphasis id="5AC3D9D5C7FC3C4C234EB0BE42B4A90F" italics="true" pageId="null" pageNumber="584">V. varia</emphasis> +Host +</taxonomicName> +) +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="DD45C108775A45AC356AE49C977C831E" pageId="null" pageNumber="584" type="vernacular_names"> +<paragraph id="9741CB8A91C4A28C325C0064302E013E" pageId="null" pageNumber="584">Bunte Wicke</paragraph> +</subSubSection> + + + +1-2 +jaehrig +, seltener ausdauernd. + +Haare an Stengel, +Blaettern +und Kelch 0,2-0,5 mm lang. + +Stengel zerstreut behaart bis fast kahl, +duenn +, 1,5-3 mm dick. +Blaetter +mit 12-20 +Teilblaettern +; +Teilblaetter +3-10mal so lang wie breit, beidseits zerstreut und anliegend bis abstehend behaart. +Blueten +in 5-15 +bluetigen +Trauben. Stiel des +Bluetenstandes +⅔- +3/4 +so lang wie das +naechststehende +Blatt. + +Kelch am Grunde auf der obern Seite deutlich sackartig ausgebuchtet; +laengste +Kelchzaehne +1,5-2,5 mm lang. + +Krone 1,2-1,7 cm lang, purpurviolett; +Stiel +( +Nagel +) +der Fahne 1 +1/2 +- +2mal so lang wie der breite obere Teil +( +Platte +) +; +Fluegel +wenig +kuerzer +als die Fahne. Frucht 2-4 cm lang, +0,7-1,2 cm breit. +Fruchtstiel (im Kelch) wenig +laenger +als die +Kelchroehre +. Samen 3,5-4 mm lang. - +Bluete +: +Frueher +Sommer. + + +Zytologische Angaben. 2n += +14: +Material aus botanischen +Gaerten +(Sveshnikova 1927, Senn 1938a, Srivastava 1963). + + +Standort. +Kollin und montan. Meist kalkhaltige, lehmige +Boeden +in warmen Lagen. Getreidefelder, +Schuttplaetze +. + + + +Verbreitung. +Suedeuropaeische +Pflanze: + +Suedeuropa +( +nordwaerts +bis Alpen; Donaubecken; oft weiter +noerdlich +verschleppt); Kaukasus. - Im Gebiet: Savoyen ( +Chambery +), +Elsass +, Schaffhauser Becken; sonst oft verschleppt, auch als Futterpflanze angebaut. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/94/A0/3794A0AFEB2391788AAC3B8DF138B2DA.xml b/data/37/94/A0/3794A0AFEB2391788AAC3B8DF138B2DA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..13873a49f9d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/94/A0/3794A0AFEB2391788AAC3B8DF138B2DA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part P) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +718 +782 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Polypodium speluncae +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 1093. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Indiis." RCN: 7919. + + + + +Lectotype +(Sledge in +Bot. J. Linn. Soc. +84: 25. 1982): Herb. Hermann 3: 41, No. 384 (BM-000621951) + +. + + + + +Current name: + +Microlepia speluncae +(L.) T. Moore + +( +Dennstaedtiaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/95/4E/37954E433DAEC45CE06C8F4A8C1B396C.xml b/data/37/95/4E/37954E433DAEC45CE06C8F4A8C1B396C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2dee72edd1a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/95/4E/37954E433DAEC45CE06C8F4A8C1B396C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + +First record of the mygalomorph spider family Paratropididae (Arachnida, Araneae) in North America with the description of a new species of Paratropis Simon from Mexico, and with new ultramorphological data for the family + + + +Author + +Valdez-Mondragon, Alejandro + + + +Author + +Mendoza, Jorge I. + + + +Author + +Francke, Oscar F. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2014 + +416 + + +1 +21 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.416.7253 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.416.7253 +1313-2970-416-1 +0A0FACC57F6F410483950FA0F1B4292D + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Araneae Paratropididae + + + +Genus +Paratropis Simon, 1889 + + + +Type species. + +Paratropis scruposa +Simon, 1889 + + + + +Diagnosis +. + + +The genus can be diagnosed with the following combination of characters (after +Raven 1985 +): 1) eye tubercle highly elevated, 2) transverse fovea, 3) narrow cheliceral furrow, with teeth on both margins in two juxtaposed rows, 4) endites with anterior conical projection, 5) Legs I of male without tibial spur, 6) paired claws of tarsus with one long tooth, 7) claw tufts absent, and 8) third claw absent on leg II (However, see Discussion concerning this character on the new species). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/95/7B/37957B1F056EECC9B9AEEA51C3416931.xml b/data/37/95/7B/37957B1F056EECC9B9AEEA51C3416931.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d8744d3adba --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/95/7B/37957B1F056EECC9B9AEEA51C3416931.xml @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ + + + +A biodiversity hotspot for Microgastrinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) in North America: annotated species checklist for Ottawa, Canada + + + +Author + +Fernandez-Triana, Jose + + + +Author + +Boudreault, Caroline + + + +Author + +Buffam, Joel + + + +Author + +Mclean, Ronald + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +633 + + +1 +93 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.63.10480 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.63.10480 +1313-2970-633-1 +DEFC153072414BA6B778CA63DB45B422 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Hymenoptera Braconidae + + + +Apanteles jft04 + + + +Distribution. +NEA. + + +Material examined. +Ontario, Ottawa, city garden, 45.3561 -75.707, 15.vii.2007, H. Goulet, Voucher Code: CAM0123. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/95/DF/3795DF802225F94946C728B684B77309.xml b/data/37/95/DF/3795DF802225F94946C728B684B77309.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9bf899c091e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/95/DF/3795DF802225F94946C728B684B77309.xml @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Hyposoter boops (Thomson, 1887) + + + + +Anilasta boops +Thomson, 1887 + + + +Distribution +England + + +Notes + +Added by +Horstmann (2013) +and raised from synonymy with brischkei. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/96/5D/37965D41CE15F79B31817EF068E2841E.xml b/data/37/96/5D/37965D41CE15F79B31817EF068E2841E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f4bd0483da8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/96/5D/37965D41CE15F79B31817EF068E2841E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +The Nevrorthidae, mistaken at all times: phylogeny and review of present knowledge (Holometabola, Neuropterida, Neuroptera) + + + +Author + +Aspoeck, Ulrike + + + +Author + +Aspoeck, Horst + + + +Author + +Liu, Xingyue + +text + + +Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift + + +2017 + +64 + + +2 + + +77 +110 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.64.13028 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.64.13028 +1860-1324-2-77 +B30AA27D33654DC4A2C609D16DC74525 + + + + +Genus +Austroneurorthus Nakahara, 1958 + + + + +Austroneurorthus +Nakahara, 1958: 29 (odescr) [Type species: +Neurorthus brunneipennis +Esben-Petersen, 1929, by original designation]. + + +Austroneurorthus +Nakahara, 1958: +New 1978 +(com); U. + +Aspoeck +2004 + +(distr); U. +Aspoeck +and H. +Aspoeck +2007 (fig: distrmap); U. +Aspoeck +and H. +Aspoeck +2010a (fig: distrmap). + + + +Diagnosis. +Adults of small body size; male forewing length 6.0-8.0 mm, hindwing length 6.0-7.0 mm, female forewing length 7.8-9.0 mm, hindwing length 6.8-8.0 mm. Body coloration yellowish, with dark pattern or brownish. Forewings transparent, crossveins partly dark and shaded. Costal crossveins of forewings partly forked. Hindwing MA and anterior branch of MP forked proximal to outer series of gradate crossveins. Male abdominal segment 7 not enlarged. A ring-like zone of glands present between male abdominal segments 8 and 9. Abdominal eversible sacks absent. Male sternite 9 long, strongly extending posteriad; gonocoxites 9 as huge plates without articulated gonostyli; gonapophyses 9 forming lobes; complex of gonocoxites + gonostyli + gonapophyses 10 amalgamated with sternite 9, forming a pseudoapex of the latter and framing it laterally; gonocoxites 11 fused into a broad sclerite. Fused female gonocoxites 8 forming a rectangular sclerite; gonocoxites 9 club-shaped, without distinct gonostyli; bursa copulatrix comprising a sclerotized structure. + + +Distribution. +Australia. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/96/81/3796815D32B757FDBE7C29EF35F1D51B.xml b/data/37/96/81/3796815D32B757FDBE7C29EF35F1D51B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..56d46393b60 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/96/81/3796815D32B757FDBE7C29EF35F1D51B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part P) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +718 +782 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Pharnaceum cerviana +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +1 + +: 272. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat Rostockii, in Russia, Hispania." RCN: 2160. + + + + +Lectotype +(Adamson in +J. S. African Bot. +24: 14. 1958): Herb. Linn. No. 387.1 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + +Mollugo cerviana +(L.) Ser. + +( +Molluginaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/96/ED/3796EDF91BA56CDE8D5CA76CC2074B92.xml b/data/37/96/ED/3796EDF91BA56CDE8D5CA76CC2074B92.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..57dc1754db8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/96/ED/3796EDF91BA56CDE8D5CA76CC2074B92.xml @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +bousquety1@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-11-28 + + +245 + + +1 +1722 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 +1313-2970-245-1 +FFFF52503A0AFF882450FFB66D45FF8E +578462 + + + + +Bembidion versicolor (LeConte, 1847) + + + + +Notaphus variegatus +Kirby, 1837: 58 [secondary homonym of + +Bembidion variegatum + +Say, 1823]. Type locality: northern parts of British America (inferred from title of the book), restricted to "Nipigon, Ont[ario]" by Lindroth (1963b: 377). Two syntypes in BMNH labeled "S[outh] of L[ake] Winnipeg" (Lindroth 1953b: 176). + + +Ochthedromus versicolor +LeConte, 1847: 462. Replacement name for + +Ochthedromus variegatus + +(Kirby, 1837). Note. Because this name was proposed as a replacement name, the specimen labeled as type [# 5535] of + +Bembidion versicolor + +in MCZ has no status. + + +Bembidion tolerans +Casey, 1918: 132. Type locality: "Metlakatla, British Columbia" (original citation). Lectotype (♀), designated by Lindroth (1975: 121), in USNM [# 37014]. Synonymy established by Lindroth (1954b: 127). + + +Bembidion terracense +Casey, 1924: 41. Type locality: "Terrace, British Columbia" (original citation). Lectotype (♂), designated by Lindroth (1975: 121), in USNM [# 37011]. Synonymy established by Lindroth (1954b: 128). + + +Bembidion wisconsinium +Casey, 1924: 41. Type locality: "Bayfield [Bayfield County], Wisconsin" (original citation). Lectotype (♀), designated by Lindroth (1975: 121), in USNM [# 37013]. Synonymy established by Lindroth (1963b: 377). + + + +Distribution. + +This species is found from Newfoundland (Lindroth 1955a: 70-71) to central Alaska (Lindroth 1963b: 378), south to northwestern Oregon (Westcott et al. 2006: 7), southern Colorado (LeConte 1879d: 501; Wickham 1902: 234; Elias 1987: 632), southwestern Nebraska (Keith County, CMNH), and southern South Carolina (Ciegler 2000: 49). The records from +"Kansas" +(Popenoe 1878: 79) and Arkansas (Wickham 1897: 104) need confirmation; those from Texas (Wickham 1897: 104), New Mexico (Fall and Cockerell 1907: 157) and Arizona (Wickham 1897: 104; Griffith 1900: 565) possibly refer to + +Bembidion impotens + +. + + + +Records. + +FRA +: PM +CAN +: AB, BC (QCI, VCI), LB, MB, NB, NF, NS (CBI), NT, ON, PE, QC, SK +USA +: AK, CO, CT, DE, IA, ID, IL, IN, KY, MA, ME, MI, MN, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NY, OH, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY [AR, KS] + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/98/A0/3798A0126A8552A38CC58BD889961357.xml b/data/37/98/A0/3798A0126A8552A38CC58BD889961357.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9e89ed4bd6f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/98/A0/3798A0126A8552A38CC58BD889961357.xml @@ -0,0 +1,194 @@ + + + +? An illustrated catalogue of the type specimens of Lepidoptera housed in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH): Part II. superfamily Papilionoidea + + + +Author + +Zahiri, Reza +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6274-6973 +Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany & Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa Plant Laboratory, Entomology Unit, Bldg. 18, 960 Carling Ave., K 1 A 0 C 6, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +reza.zahiri@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Nazari, Vazrick +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9064-8959 +Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany + + + +Author + +Rajaei, Hossein +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3940-3734 +Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany + + + +Author + +Wiemers, Martin +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5272-3903 +Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany + + + +Author + +Fatahi, Maryam +Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany + + + +Author + +Seidel, Matthias +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-8778 +Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany + + + +Author + +Dalsgaard, Thure +Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany + + + +Author + +Husemann, Martin +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5536-6681 +Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany + +text + + +Evolutionary Systematics + + +2021 + +2021-08-20 + + +5 + + +2 + + +193 +261 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.5.63435 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.5.63435 +2535-0730-2-193 +984E15D880E04B7DA84F92BB0AD4EA73 +21773559522D5D9DA4B1A7DA51E4F2A6 + + + + +8. +Parnassius f. appendiculata Turati, 1918 + + + +Original combination. + +" + +Parnassius apollo pumilus + +Stich. forma appendiculata (f. nuova)" Turati, 1918 Atti. Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. 57: 41. + + + +Current combination. + + + +Parnassius apollo pumilus + +f. appendiculata Turati, 1918 + +. + + + +Current status. +Infrasubspecific and hence unavailable name. + + +Original material. + + +Labelled as +"Cotype" +1?1? ( +ZMH 61589 +-61590) (Fig. +8 +). "Calabrien / Aspermonte, + +1800 m + +/ Stauder +5.7.1920 +" // " +flavomaculata +/ appendiculata" // " +flavomaculata +/ appendiculata" // "Sammlung / +G. Warnecke +/ Eing. Nr.5, 1949" // +"Cotype" +// " +ZMH 61589 +"; "Calabrien / Aspromonte, + +1800 m + +/ Stauder +5.7.1920 +" // "nigricans / appendiculata" // "? nigricans / appendiculata" // "Sammlung / +G. Warnecke +/ Eing. Nr.5, 1949" // +"Cotype" +// " +ZMH 61590 +" + +. + + + +Original locality. +Italy: Calabria. + + +Remarks. + +Turati (1918) +proposed this name as a form of + +P. a. pumilus + +Stichel, 1906. Therefore, as stated by article 45.6.1 ( +ICZN 1999 +) it is deemed to be an infrasubspecific name (the author expressly gave it infrasubspecific rank) and is hence unavailable. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/99/51/3799519097FC5A85A8E07DC5D97E1567.xml b/data/37/99/51/3799519097FC5A85A8E07DC5D97E1567.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e83bb8fc3c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/99/51/3799519097FC5A85A8E07DC5D97E1567.xml @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@ + + + +A new species of Crocidosema Zeller (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from the Andes of northern Chile + + + +Author + +Vargas, Hector A. + +text + + +Nota Lepidopterologica + + +2019 + +42 + + +2 + + +129 +136 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/nl.42.38341 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/nl.42.38341 +2367-5365-2-129 +18830D74393542779EA778C30A8FED48 +674D3B944E2C5DA5A1B5D05CBEEDA1B6 + + + + +Crocidosema nitsugai +sp. nov. +Figs 1-5 + + + +Type material. + +HOLOTYPE, male, CHILE: Putre, Parinacota, Chile, emerged April 2019, H.A. Vargas coll., ex-larva + +Lupinus oreophilus + +, March 2019, genitalia slide HAV-1278 (MNNC). + +Paratypes, CHILE. One male, two females, same data as holotype, genitalia slides HAV-1261, 1270, 1271 (MNNC); four males, one female, same data as holotype, genitalia slides HAV-1259, 1275, 1276, 1277, 1279 (IDEA). + + +Diagnosis. + +The genitalia of + +C. nitsugai + +are remarkably similar to those of + +C. marcapatae + +(Razowski & Wojtusiak, 2010), described under + +Epinotia + +Hubner, [1825] from Cusco, Peru. However, the female genitalia of + +C. nitsugai + +have a parallel-sided antrum with the dorsal wall posteriorly projected and the posterior margin of sternum VII widely notched at the middle. In contrast, those of + +C. marcapatae + +have a cup-shaped antrum without posterior projection of dorsal wall and posterior margin of sternum VII almost straight. In the male genitalia of + +C. nitsugai + +the neck of the valva is almost uniform in height throughout its length with a narrow longitudinal carina, and dorsal and ventral lobes of the cucullus are similar in size. In contrast, in + +C. marcapatae + +the neck of the valva is broadened on basal half and lacks carina, and the dorsal lobe of the cucullus is conspicuously smaller than the ventral lobe. The female genitalia of + +C. nitsugai + +also resemble those of + +C. pusula + +Razowski & Becker, 2014, described from Carchi, Ecuador. However, the parallel-sided antrum, cingulum longer than the larger signum and two longitudinal stripes along the middle of sternum VII of + +C. nitsugai + +contrast with the cup-shaped antrum, cingulum slightly shorter than the smaller signum and absence of longitudinal stripes on the sternum VII of + +C. pusula + +. The male of + +C. pusula + +is unknown, impeding comparisons with + +C. nitsugai + +. + + + +Figures 1-5. +Adult stage of + +Crocidosema nitsugai + +sp. nov. +1. +Holotype male in dorsal view. +2. +Male genitalia in ventral view, phallus removed; upper right rectangle showing longitudinal carina on the neck of the right valva. +3. +Phallus in lateral view; upper left rectangle showing base of cornuti. +4. +Tergum (left) and sternum (right) of male abdominal segment VIII. +5. +Female genitalia in ventral view. Scale bars: 2 mm ( +1 +), 0.3 mm ( +2-4 +), 0.25 mm ( +5 +). + + + + +Description. + +Male +. ( +Figs 1-5 +) Forewing length 8.5-9.5 mm. + + +Head +. Vertex and frons mainly whitish gray with a few scattered grayish brown scales. Labial palpus mainly grayish brown with a few scattered whitish gray scales. Antenna whitish gray. + + +Thorax +. Mainly yellowish brown dorsally with a few scattered dark gray scales, whitish gray latero-ventrally; patagium grayish brown. Foreleg with anterior face grayish brown, posterior face whitish gray. Midleg similar to foreleg in coloration, tibial spurs whitish gray. Hindleg whitish gray, including tibial spurs. Forewing mainly yellowish brown with abundant whitish gray and grayish brown scales intermixed outside the discal cell, a few scattered dark gray scales near external margin; fringe grayish brown. Hindwing mainly grayish brown, scattered whitish gray scales, fringe whitish gray. + + +Abdomen +. Grayish brown. Tergum VIII ( +Fig. 4 +) somewhat T-shaped; anterior margin straight; lateral margin widely excavated on anterior half; posterior margin about 1/3 the width of anterior margin. Sternum VIII somewhat square-shaped, posterior margin widely excavated in the middle. + + +Male genitalia +( +Figs 2 +, +3 +). Tegumen with anterior and posterior margins mainly parallel. Uncus cylindrical, slightly sclerotized, broadened basally, apex rounded, covered with hair-like setae. Socius slightly longer than uncus, narrow, tapering apically. Juxta semicircular, dorsal margin straight. Henion (sclerite between anellus and gnathos) narrow, elongated, well sclerotized, slightly longer than socius. Valvae symmetrical, wide incision on ventral margin; base of valva triangular; sacculus narrow; neck of valva almost uniform in height throughout its length, a narrow longitudinal carina on medial face; cucullus densely covered with hair-like scales, dorsal and ventral lobes similar in size. Phallus cylindrical, slightly longer than sacculus, slightly broadened basally; vesica with several spine-shaped cornuti. + + +Female +. Similar to male in maculation and size. + + +Female genitalia +( +Fig. 5 +). Papillae analis narrow, elongated, slightly sclerotized, with hair-like setae. Posterior apophysis spine-shaped, slightly broadened basally, about twice length of papillae analis. Anterior apophysis similar to posterior apophysis in shape and length. Tergum VIII with U-shaped notch on anterior margin. Sternum VII with anterior margin straight; lateral margin widely excavated close anterior margin; posterior margin bilobed, widely notched in middle; two mainly parallel longitudinal stripes along the middle diverging close the anterior margin. Antrum parallel-sided, dorsal wall posteriorly projected. Ductus bursae slightly curved, membranous basally and apically; a well-developed cingulum with apex exceeding anterior margin of sternum VII. Corpus bursae membranous, pear-shaped, about 1.5 times length of ductus bursae; two slightly curved saw-like signa laterally. + + + +Geographic distribution. + + +Crocidosema nitsugai + +is known only from the type locality, in the surroundings of Putre, Parinacota Province, at 3670 m elevation on the Andes of northern Chile ( +Fig. 6 +). + + + +Host plant. + +The only host plant currently known for + +C. nitsugai + +is the perennial herb + +Lupinus oreophilus + +Phil. ( +Figs 7-9 +), upon which the larvae feed on leaves, flowers and unripe fruits and seeds. + + + +Etymology. + +The specific epithet is dedicated to the memory of the great Paraguayan guitarist and composer +Agustin +Pio +Barrios, also known as Nitsuga +Mangore +, as an acknowledgement to his amazing musical contribution. + + + +Figures 6-9. +Habitat and host plant of + +Crocidosema nitsugai + +sp. nov. +6. +Habitat of + +C. nitsugai + +in the type locality, near Putre, Parinacota Province, at 3670 m elevation on the Andes northern Chile. +7. +The host plant + +Lupinus oreophilus + +. +8. +Inflorescence of + +L. oreophilus + +. +9. +Fruits of + +L. oreophilus + +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9A/0E/379A0E1B6E4AC8C2197AD7D6FEF80ED7.xml b/data/37/9A/0E/379A0E1B6E4AC8C2197AD7D6FEF80ED7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..574a019091f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9A/0E/379A0E1B6E4AC8C2197AD7D6FEF80ED7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Euphorbiaceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +446 +458 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Euphorbia chamaesyce +L. + + + + + +Artbeschreibung: +Aehnlich +wie + +E. maculata + +, aber +Staengel +kahl oder behaart, + +Blaetter +bis 1,5mal so lang wie breit, v.a. untere rundlich + +, Durchmesser +4-8 mm +, mit oder ohne roten Fleck. +Huellbecher +und Frucht behaart bis kahl, +Druesen +mit weissen +Anhaengseln +. +Samen weiss bis graubraun +, scharfkantig, mit +unregelmaessig +grubig-wulstigen +Seitenflaechen +. + + + + +Bluetezeit +: 6-9 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz: Trockene, steinige +Boeden +, Bahnareale, Weinberge, adventiv / kollin / + + + +Verbreitung global: Mediterran-westasiatisch + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F +maessig +trocken; Feuchtigkeit stark wechselnd (mehr als ++/- +2 Stufen) +Lichtzahl Lsehr hellSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rschwach sauer bis neutral (pH 4.5-7.5)Temperaturzahl T +sehr warm-kollin (nur an +waermsten +Stellen, Hauptverbreitung in +Suedeuropa +) +
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +maessig +naehrstoffarm +bis +maessig +naehrstoffreich + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subozeanisch (hohe Luftfeuchtigkeit, geringe Temperaturschwankungen, eher milde Winter)
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Zwerg-Wolfsmilch +Nom +francais +: +Euphorbe petit figuier +Nome italiano: +Euforbia fico per terra +, +Erba pondina + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9A/1C/379A1C72A1293768CD13BAF77502C8DB.xml b/data/37/9A/1C/379A1C72A1293768CD13BAF77502C8DB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c9b53bbd220 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9A/1C/379A1C72A1293768CD13BAF77502C8DB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ + + + +Order Cetacea + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +723 +743 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Stenella frontalis +(G. Cuvier 1829) + + + + + + + +[Delphinus] frontalis +G. Cuvier 1829 + +, +Regn. Anim., Nouv. ed., Vol. 1: 288 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +"découvert un aux îles du +Cap-Vert +". (= off +Cape Verde +Isls, West Africa). + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Atlantic Spotted Dolphin +. + + + + +Synonyms: + +Stenella doris +( +Gray 1846 +) + +; + +Stenella froenatus +(F. Cuvier 1836) + +; + +Stenella plagiodon +(Cope 1866) + +; + +Stenella pernettensis +(de Blainville 1817) + +; + +Stenella pernettyi +( +Desmarest 1820 +) + +. + + + + +Distribution: +Atlantic Ocean including the +Gulf +of +Mexico +: warm-temperate to tropical waters. + + + + +Conservation: +CITES +– Appendix II; +IUCN +– Data Deficient. + + + + +Discussion: +Perrin et al. (1987) +revised this species. The + +International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1977 +a +) + +suppressed + +D. pernettensis +de Blainville, 1817 + +and + +D. pernettyi +Desmarest, 1820 + +, which + +Hershkovitz (1966 +a +) + +used as a senior synonym for + +S. plagiodon + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9A/2C/379A2C4C11B9DA85FC254FBAAF3A3ADE.xml b/data/37/9A/2C/379A2C4C11B9DA85FC254FBAAF3A3ADE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..310e34dd5f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9A/2C/379A2C4C11B9DA85FC254FBAAF3A3ADE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Myocastoridae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +1593 +1593 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + +Myocastoridae Ameghino 1904 + + + + + + +Myocastoridae +Ameghino 1904 + +, + +Anales Soc. Cient. +Argentina +, 56-58: 103 + + +. + + + + +Genera: +1 genus with 1 species: + + +Genus + +Myocastor +Kerr 1792 + +(1 species with 4 subspecies) + + + + +Discussion: +The higher-level classification of + +Myocastor + +remains unresolved. Myocastorids presumably evolved in the Oligocene of South America from an echimyid of the subfamily + +Adelophomyinae ( +Woods et al., 1992 +) + +. The myocastorids have been included in +Capromyidae +by +Hall (1981) +, +Corbet and Hill (1991) +, and others, included in the + +Echimyidae ( +McKenna and Bell, 1997 +) + +, and placed in the family +Myocastoridae +by +Ameghino (1904) +, +Woods and Howland (1979) +, and +Woods (1993) +. + +Patterson and Pascual (1968 +b +) + +and +Patterson and Wood (1982) +considered both myocastorids and capromyids to be subfamilies of the +Echimyidae +, based on the retention of the deciduous premolar in these taxa. Sequence data support this placement, as +Leite and Patton (2002) +suggested the inclusion of + +Myocastor + +and + +Capromys + +within the +Echimyidae +. Although +Leite and Patton (2002) +identified + +Capromys + +as the sister taxon of + +Myocastor + +, their placement within the +Echimyidae +clade is not well supported and is in need of further examination. Though myocastorids are related to echimyids and capromyids, +Woods (1972 +, 1982) and +Woods and Howland (1979) +concluded that there are too many morphological differences to unite myocastorids with either of these taxa in the same family. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9A/34/379A34EA309BFDE406D3045FC9D6A746.xml b/data/37/9A/34/379A34EA309BFDE406D3045FC9D6A746.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..db778ff900b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9A/34/379A34EA309BFDE406D3045FC9D6A746.xml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + + +Hyperbatus +Foerster +, 1869 + + + + +Notes + +Distribution data from +Shaw and Kasparyan (2003) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9A/83/379A83A3FC4A3009FE51D511223B3B8E.xml b/data/37/9A/83/379A83A3FC4A3009FE51D511223B3B8E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c05a2333c63 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9A/83/379A83A3FC4A3009FE51D511223B3B8E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Himerta bisannulata (Thomson, 1883) + + + + +Euryproctus bisannulatus +Thomson, 1883 + + +pfeifferi +(Bauer, 1939, +Himertus +) + + + +Notes + +Added by +Horstmann (2002a) +and taken out of synonymy with defectiva; one specimen in BMNH, 'British Isles, Desvignes coll.' + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9B/AA/379BAAF4A098E58DAC1319363CB823AC.xml b/data/37/9B/AA/379BAAF4A098E58DAC1319363CB823AC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..09b3b1c3969 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9B/AA/379BAAF4A098E58DAC1319363CB823AC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ + + + +Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 3. Plumbaginaceae bis Compositae (2 nd edition): Caprifoliaceae + + + +Author + +Hess, Hans Ernst + + + +Author + +Landolt, Elias + + + +Author + +Hirzel, Rosmarie + +text + +1976 +Birkhaeuser Verlag + + +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.292249 + +book +292249 +10.5281/zenodo.292249 +3-7643-0556-8 + + + +<subSubSection id="6BD1F7F0C1068A1B6ACE55FAC7128125" pageId="null" pageNumber="317" type="nomenclature"> +<paragraph id="BBB3995213274B239F980D3BCC71B2D7" pageId="null" pageNumber="317"> +<taxonomicName id="F078B27D99F03D50286DB2C997570893" authority="L." class="Magnoliopsida" family="Caprifoliaceae" genus="Lonicera" kingdom="Plantae" order="Dipsacales" pageId="null" pageNumber="317" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="xylosteum"> +Lonicera +<normalizedToken id="F5C9AFA8C2F9CB9452A360D478AB2FBA" originalValue="Xylósteum" pageId="null" pageNumber="317">Xylosteum</normalizedToken> +<authorityName id="D3768F3B8790822D9AF13591E7798403" pageId="null" pageNumber="317">L.</authorityName> +</taxonomicName> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="FC5FAF96BB0398D529128C92EF48EAC1" pageId="null" pageNumber="317" type="vernacular_names"> +<paragraph id="5BAD19BB85C746A34CFABD151AC56AA7" pageId="null" pageNumber="317"> +Rotes +<normalizedToken id="8C7B12AF0EB58143C240A36475914ADB" originalValue="Geißblatt" pageId="null" pageNumber="317">Geissblatt</normalizedToken> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> + + + +Strauch, bis 2 m hoch. +Blaetter +sommergruen +, am Grunde nie miteinander verwachsen, breit lanzettlich, seltener breit oval, 2-6 cm lang, 1-2mal so lang wie breit, kurz zugespitzt oder mit aufgesetzter Spitze, am Grunde abgerundet oder in den Stiel +verschmaelert +, oberseits +dunkelgruen +, unterseits heller, +beiderseits weich behaart +(nicht kahl werdend), meist ohne gestielte +Druesen +; Blattstiel 2-5 mm lang. +Blueten +zu 2 auf gemeinsamem Stiel; +gemeinsamer Stiel 1 +- +2mal so lang wie die Kronen +. Kelchzipfel ca. 0,5 mm lang. +Krone 1 +- +1,5 cm lang +, zuerst +weisslich +, +spaeter +hellgelb, gelegentlich rosa +ueberlaufen +. Die paarweise angeordneten + +Fruechte +hellrot, nicht verwachsen. + +- +Bluete +: +Spaeter +Fruehling +und +frueher +Sommer. + + +Zytologische Angaben. 2n += +18: +Siehe unter Gattung. + + +Standort +. Kollin und montan, seltener subalpin. Feuchte bis trockene, kalkhaltige und kalkfreie +Boeden +. +Laubmischwaelder +, Hecken und +Gebuesche +. + + +Verbreitung. Eurosibirische Pflanze: +Nordwaerts +bis ca. 65° NB, +ostwaerts +bis ins Gebiet des Ob und des Baikalsees; +suedwaerts +bis Mittelspanien, Sizilien, +noerdliches +Griechenland, Kaukasus (?). - Im Gebiet verbreitet und +haeufig +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9B/E8/379BE8AFCC8CDF6921EBA5FFEF86B42D.xml b/data/37/9B/E8/379BE8AFCC8CDF6921EBA5FFEF86B42D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d0380390842 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9B/E8/379BE8AFCC8CDF6921EBA5FFEF86B42D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +Targeting a portion of central European spider diversity for permanent preservation + + + +Author + +Candek, Klemen + + + +Author + +Gregoric, Matjaz + + + +Author + +Kostanjsek, Rok + + + +Author + +Frick, Holger + + + +Author + +Kropf, Christian + + + +Author + +Kuntner, Matjaz + + + +Author + +Miller, Jeremy A. + + + +Author + +Hoeksema, Bert W. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2013 + +1 + + +980 +980 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e980 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e980 +1314-2828-1 + + + + +minutus +Lepthyphantes +Linyphiidae +Animalia + + + + +Lepthyphantes minutus (Blackwall, 1833) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +Occurrence: recordedBy: + +Kostanjsek +, +RTSB +2011 + +; sex: +1 female +; Location: locationID: SI07; country: +Slovenia +; locality: +Ljutomer +; minimumElevationInMeters: 175; maximumElevationInMeters: 175; decimalLatitude: +46.5272 +; decimalLongitude: +16.2050 +; Event: eventDate: +2011-07-22 +; habitat: forest + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9C/63/379C631E94C8976EE650064B699E0591.xml b/data/37/9C/63/379C631E94C8976EE650064B699E0591.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..290ea165b77 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9C/63/379C631E94C8976EE650064B699E0591.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Sawflies, ' Symphyta' + + + +Author + +Liston, Andrew D. + + + +Author + +Knight, Guy T. + + + +Author + +Sheppard, David A. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1168 +1168 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 +1314-2828--1168 +3C3EC7B09BA145848E3E89CBBD28B432 +3C3EC7B09BA145848E3E89CBBD28B432 + + + + +Pristiphora (Lygaeotus) pseudocoactula (Lindqvist, 1952) + + + + +Lygaeonematus pseudocoactulus +Lindqvist, 1952 + + +Pristiphora pachyvalvis +(Konow, 1904): Benson, 1934 misident. + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9C/D3/379CD38A4A1EF6050150EC9DB9331863.xml b/data/37/9C/D3/379CD38A4A1EF6050150EC9DB9331863.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0286d2d7120 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9C/D3/379CD38A4A1EF6050150EC9DB9331863.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Sawflies, ' Symphyta' + + + +Author + +Liston, Andrew D. + + + +Author + +Knight, Guy T. + + + +Author + +Sheppard, David A. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1168 +1168 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 +1314-2828-2-1168 + + + + +Calameuta Konow, 1896 + + + + +MONOPLOPUS +Konow, 1896 + + +HAPLOCEPHUS +Benson, 1935 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9D/7B/379D7B28F8F45316BDBF917A212F223F.xml b/data/37/9D/7B/379D7B28F8F45316BDBF917A212F223F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9d0723c4dfa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9D/7B/379D7B28F8F45316BDBF917A212F223F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +A synopsis of the expanded Rhaphiolepis (Maleae, Rosaceae) + + + +Author + +Liu, Bin-Bin +State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China & Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0297-7531 + + + +Author + +Wang, Yu-Bing +Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA + + + +Author + +Hong, De-Yuan +State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China + + + +Author + +Wen, Jun +Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA +wenj@si.edu + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2020 + +154 + + +19 +55 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.154.52790 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.154.52790 +1314-2003-154-19 +038823CB84C75FBE8AB28F6028C06FDA + + + + +40. +Rhaphiolepis tengyuehensis (W.W.Sm.) B.B.Liu & J.Wen, Front. Plant Sci. 10-1731: 12. 2020. + + + + +≡ +Eriobotrya tengyuehensis +W.W.Sm., Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 10: 30. 1917. Type: China. Yunnan: Shweli-Salween divide, Lat. 25°5'N, alt. 7000 ft., tree of 40-60 ft., flowers creamy-yellow, open forests, May 1913, +G. Forest 9857 +(lectotype, designated by +Vidal 1965 +, pg. 571: E [barcode E00011333]!). + + +≡ +Pyrus tengyuehensis +(W.W.Sm.) M.F.Fay & Christenh., Global Fl. 4: 123. 2018. Type: Based on +Eriobotrya tengyuehensis +. + + + +Distribution. +China (NW Yunnan and Tibet) and Myanmar (Kachin). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9D/80/379D80FC56F00437A4D9EA4B964EF368.xml b/data/37/9D/80/379D80FC56F00437A4D9EA4B964EF368.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d21ebabd317 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9D/80/379D80FC56F00437A4D9EA4B964EF368.xml @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + +Hornmilben (Oribatida) [pages 213 to 260] + + + +Author + +Weigmann, G. + + + +Author + +Miko, L. + +text + + +2006 +Goecke & Evers + +Keltern + + + +Hornmilben (Oribatida) [Dahl, Tierwelt Deutschlands, Teil 76] + + + +213 +260 + + + + +http://www.goeckeevers.de/verlag/dahl.html + +book chapter +Weigmann2006pp213to260 + + + + +Quadroppia galaica Minguez +, Ruiz & Subias, 1985 + + + + +Syn., Tax.: +Q. pseudocircumita galaica +: Minguez, Ruiz & Subias 1985. Q. g.: Subias & Arillo 2001 (B). +Coronoquadroppia p. g. +: Ohkubo 1995. + + + + +Oekologie +: In feuchten Humusauflagen. + + + + +Verbreitung: Mehrere +Laender +Europas, Kuba (bisher nicht in Deutschland). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9D/86/379D861460A83E8D23E5C2E5B2F0AB6A.xml b/data/37/9D/86/379D861460A83E8D23E5C2E5B2F0AB6A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7e3e6010444 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9D/86/379D861460A83E8D23E5C2E5B2F0AB6A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,605 @@ + + + +Taxonomic revision of the tarantula genus Aphonopelma Pocock, 1901 (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Theraphosidae) within the United States + + + +Author + +Hamilton, Chris A. + + + +Author + +Hendrixson, Brent E. + + + +Author + +Bond, Jason E. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +560 + + +1 +340 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.560.6264 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.560.6264 +1313-2970-560-1 +F4C1691C13584FA9A031E305DEE2B6A2 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Araneae Theraphosidae + + + +Aphonopelma iodius (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1939) +Figures 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67; Suppl. material 4 + + + + +Delopelma iodius +Chamberlin & Ivie, 1939: 6; male holotype from 2 miles W of Castle Cliffs, Washington Co., Utah, 37.072028 -113.919773 4, elev. 3663ft., 27.xi.1936, coll. unknown. Paratype males from Zion National Park, Washington Co., Utah, 37.205521 -112.983664 5, elev. 3973ft., no collecting date, coll. unknown; deposited in AMNH. [examined] + + +Rhechostica iodius +Raven, 1985: 149. + + +Aphonopelma iodium +Smith, 1995: 115. + + +Aphonopelma iodium +Prentice, 1997: 162. + + +Aphonopelma iodius +(spelling change; Platnick, World Spider Catalog) + + +Aphonopelma angusi +Chamberlin, 1940: 21; male holotype from two miles west of Beaver Dam Mts., on Beaver Dam slope, Washington Co., Utah, 37.150885 -113.917096 6, elev. 6332ft., 7.x.1939, coll. Dr. Angus M. Woodbury, Ross Hardy, Harold Higgins, and Robert Pendleton; deposited in AMNH. [examined] + + +Aphonopelma angusi +Smith, 1995: 72. previously synonymized by Prentice, 1997: 162. + + +Delopelma melanius +Chamberlin & Ivie, 1939: 5; male holotype and female allotype from Salt Lake City, Salt Lake Co., Utah, 40.760779 -111.891047 6, elev. 4284ft., no collecting date, coll. unknown; deposited in AMNH. [examined] + + +Aphonopelma melanium +Smith, 1995: 120. previously synonymized by Prentice, 1997: 162. + + +Aphonopelma nevadanum +Chamberlin, 1940: 12; male holotype from Searchlight, Clark Co., Nevada, 35.465269 -114.919701 5, elev. 3590ft., 2.xii.1930, coll. Geo. Carter; deposited in AMNH. [examined] + + +Aphonopelma nevadanum +Smith, 1995: 125. previously synonymized by Prentice, 1997: 162. + + +Aphonopelma brunnius +Chamberlin, 1940: 11; male holotype from Jasper Ridge Biological Preserve, W of Stanford University, Palo Alto, Santa Clara Co., California, 37.405240 -122.242100 4, elev. 378ft., 13.xi.1921, coll. C.D. Duncan; deposited in AMNH. [examined] + + +Rhechostica brunnius +Raven, 1985: 149. + + +Aphonopelma brunnium +Smith, 1995: 79. syn. n. + + +Aphonopelma chamberlini +Smith, 1995: 86; female holotype from Camp Roberts, outside of Paso Robles, Co., California, 35.790969 -120.743364 5, elev. 642ft., no collecting date, coll. Rupert Hazen; deposited in BMNH. [examined] syn. n. + + +Aphonopelma iviei +Smith, 1995: 115; male holotype from Death Valley, Inyo Co., California, 36.735992 -116.970188 6, elev. 2761ft., 30.ix.1883, coll. Chalmers-Hunt; deposited in BMNH. [examined] syn. n. + + +Aphonopelma lithodomum +Chamberlin, 1940: 14; male holotype from House Rock, Coconino Co., Arizona, 36.703978 -111.947171 5, elev. 5168ft., 9.ix.1939, coll. D. and S. Mulaik; deposited in AMNH. [examined] + + +Rhechostica lithodomum +Raven, 1985: 149. + + +Aphonopelma lithodomum +Smith, 1995: 119. syn. n. + + +Aphonopelma smithi +Smith, 1995: 145; male holotype from Frank Raines County Park, off Del Puerto Canyon Rd, ~20km W of Patterson, Stanislaus Co., California, 37.422734 -121.380697 5, elev. 1153ft., coll. Russell Smith, x.1992; deposited in BMNH. Two male paratypes from Patterson, Stanislaus Co., California, 37.471600 -121.129656 5, elev. 107ft., x.1992, coll. Russell Smith; deposited in BMNH. [examined] syn. n. + + +Aphonopelma zionis +Chamberlin, 1940: 24; male holotype from Zion National Park, near entrance, Washington Co., Utah, 37.205521 -112.983664 4, elev. 3973ft., 16.viii.1925, coll. Dr. A.M. Woodbury; deposited in AMNH. [examined] + + +Rhechostica zionis +Raven, 1985: 149. + + +Aphonopelma zionis +Smith, 1995: 157. syn. n. + + + +Diagnosis. + +Aphonopelma iodius +(Fig. 61) is a member of the +iodius +species group and can be identified by a combination of morphological, molecular, and geographic characteristics. Nuclear DNA identifies +Aphonopelma iodius +as a strongly supported lineage that is the sister lineage to +Aphonopelma eutylenum +, and paraphyletic with regards to the incipient species lineage +Aphonopelma johnnycashi +sp. n. (Fig. 8). There are no pronounced measurements or characters that help discriminate male or female +Aphonopelma iodius +from closely related phylogenetic species in the +iodius +species group, except for +Aphonopelma johnnycashi +sp. n., which is geographically and morphologically distinct. Males and females of +Aphonopelma iodius +can easily be differentiated from +Aphonopelma steindachneri +by their lighter color and greater extent of scopulation on metatarsi III and IV, and from syntopic members of the +paloma +species group ( + +Aphonopelma +atomicum + +sp. n., +Aphonopelma icenoglei +sp. n., +Aphonopelma joshua +, +Aphonopelma mojave +, and +Aphonopelma prenticei +sp. n.) by their larger size. Male +Aphonopelma iodius +possess a larger L3 scopulation extent (78%-96%) than +Aphonopelma steindachneri +(40%-54%), and a larger L4 scopulation extent (62%-88%) than +Aphonopelma steindachneri +(21%-31%). Female +Aphonopelma iodius +possess a larger L3 scopulation extent (72%-95%) than +Aphonopelma steindachneri +(51%-61%), and a larger L4 scopulation extent (59%-83%) than +Aphonopelma steindachneri +(24%-34%). + + + +Figure 61. +Aphonopelma iodius +(Chamberlin & Ivie, 1939) specimens, live photographs. Female (L) - APH_3201; Male (R) - APH_3202. + + + + +Description. + +Originally described by +Chamberlin and Ivie (1939) +. + + + +Redescription of male exemplar + +(APH_2015; Fig. 62). Specimen preparation and condition: Specimen collected live crossing road, preserved in 80% ethanol; deposited in AUMNH; original coloration faded due to preservation. Left legs I, III, IV, and left pedipalp removed for measurements and photographs; stored in vial with specimen. Right leg III removed for DNA and stored at -80°C in the AUMNH (Auburn, AL). General coloration: Black and faded brown. Cephalothorax: Carapace 16.14 mm long, 15.02 mm wide; Hirsute; densely clothed with light brown iridescent pubescence mostly appressed to surface; fringe covered in long setae not closely appressed to surface; foveal groove medium deep and straight; pars cephalica region rises gradually from foveal groove, gently arching anteriorly toward ocular area; AER slightly procurved, PER very slightly recurved; normal sized chelicerae; clypeus slightly extends forward on a curve; LBl 2.04, LBw 2.56; sternum hirsute, clothed with black, densely packed setae. Abdomen: Densely clothed in short black/brown pubescence with numerous longer red/orange setae interspersed; possessing a dense dorsal patch of black Type I urticating bristles ( +Cooke et al. 1972 +). Legs: Hirsute, particularly ventrally; densely clothed in a mix of black or faded black pubescence, femurs are darker. Metatarsus I slightly curved. F1 16.56; F1w 4.02; P1 6.57; T1 14.65; M1 13.29; A1 8.96; F3 13.95; F3w 4.46; P3 5.58; T3 11.42; M3 13.91; A3 8.33; F4 16.27; F4w 3.86; P4 5.79; T4 13.82; M4 17.32; A4 9.16; femur III is slightly swollen. All tarsi fully scopulate. Extent of metatarsal scopulation: leg III (SC3) = 93.1%; leg IV (SC4) = 72.1%. One ventral spinose seta on metatarsus III; six ventral spinose setae on metatarsus IV; two prolateral spinose setae on tibia I. Coxa I: Prolateral surface a mix of fine, hair-like and tapered setae. Pedipalps: Hirsute; densely clothed in the same setal color as the other legs, with numerous longer ventral setae; one spinose seta on the apical, prolateral femur; two spinose setae on the prolateral patella; four spinose setae on the prolateral tibia; PTl 9.033, PTw 2.97. When extended, embolus tapers and gently curves to the retrolateral side near apex; embolus very slender, no keels. + + + +Figure 62. +Aphonopelma iodius +(Chamberlin & Ivie, 1939). +A-I +male specimen, APH_2015 A dorsal view of carapace, scale bar = 7mm B prolateral view of coxa I C dorsal view of femur III D ventral view of metatarsus III, scale bar = 5mm E ventral view of metatarsus IV, scale bar = 4.5mm F prolateral view of L pedipalp and palpal tibia, scale bar = 4.5mm G dorsal view of palpal bulb H retrolateral view of palpal bulb, scale bar = 1mm I prolateral view of tibia I (mating clasper), scale bar = 4.5mm. + + + +Variation (23).Cl 9.69-17.75 (13.959 ++/- +0.45), Cw 8.51-16.49 (13.019 ++/- +0.43), LBl 1.21-2.23 (1.734 ++/- +0.06), LBw 1.397-2.56 (2.079 ++/- +0.06), F1 10.336-16.69 (14.442 ++/- +0.38), F1w 2.13-4.38 (3.326 ++/- +0.12), P1 3.916-6.92 (5.704 ++/- +0.16), T1 9.343-14.65 (12.294 ++/- +0.28), M1 7.918-14.62 (11.76 ++/- +0.34), A1 5.204-9.03 (7.508 ++/- +0.21), L1 length 36.717-60.79 (51.709 ++/- +1.33), F3 8.88-14.81 (12.472 ++/- +0.34), F3w 2.27-4.51 (3.525 ++/- +0.12), P3 3.248-6.39 (4.935 ++/- +0.17), T3 6.934-11.84 (9.943 ++/- +0.28), M3 8.446-14.28 (12.058 ++/- +0.35), A3 5.067-8.63 (7.204 ++/- +0.21), L3 length 32.69-54.63 (46.665 ++/- +1.35), F4 10.308-17.21 (14.341 ++/- +0.39), F4w 2.127-4.27 (3.258 ++/- +0.12), P4 3.614-6.59 (5.277 ++/- +0.17), T4 8.674-14.44 (12.274 ++/- +0.31), M4 10.951-18.26 +( +15.385 ++/- +0.4), A4 5.39-9.58 (7.96 ++/- +0.24), L4 length 39.514-63.97 (55.346 ++/- +1.51), PTl 6.198-10.293 (8.387 ++/- +0.22), PTw 2.04-3.30 (2.687 ++/- +0.07), SC3 ratio 0.789-0.961 (0.896 ++/- +0.01), SC4 ratio 0.623-0.876 (0.746 ++/- +0.01), Coxa I setae = thin tapered/tapered, F3 condition = normal/slightly swollen. + + + +Description of female exemplar + +(APH_2016; Figs 63-66). Specimen preparation and condition: Specimen collected live from burrow, preserved in 80% ethanol; deposited in AUMNH; original coloration faded due to preservation. Left legs I, III, IV, and pedipalp removed for photographs and measurements; stored in vial with specimen. Right leg III removed for DNA and stored at -80°C in the AUMNH (Auburn, AL). Genital plate with spermathecae removed and cleared, stored in vial with specimen. General coloration: Faded brown/black. Cephalothorax: Carapace 18.71 mm long, 17.01 mm wide; Hirsute, densely clothed with light brown pubescence closely appressed to surface; fringe densely covered in longer setae; foveal groove medium deep and straight; pars cephalica region gently rises from thoracic furrow, arching anteriorly toward ocular area; AER slightly procurved, PER very slightly recurved; large chelicerae, clypeus extends forward on a curve; LBl 2.48, LBw 3.25; sternum very hirsute, clothed with dark brown setae. Abdomen: Densely clothed dorsally in short black setae with numerous longer, lighter setae interspersed (generally red or orange in situ); dense dorsal patch of black Type I urticating bristles ( +Cooke et al. 1972 +); ventral side with shorter black/dark brown setae. Spermathecae: Paired and separate with wide bases, tapering and curving medially towards capitate bulbs. Legs: Very hirsute, particularly ventrally; densely clothed in medium and long brown pubescence, femurs darker. F1 15.37; F1w 4.45; P1 6.35; T1 11.57; M1 9.73; A1 7.40; F3 12.78; F3w 3.84; P3 5.79; T3 9.39; M3 9.85; A3 7.72; F4 15.23; F4w 4.28; P4 6.54; T4 11.62; M4 12.71; A4 8.91. All tarsi fully scopulate. Extent of metatarsal scopulation: leg III (SC3) = 87.8%; leg IV (SC4) = 81.4%. Three ventral spinose setae on metatarsus III; five ventral spinose setae on metatarsus IV. Coxa I: Prolateral surface a mix of fine, hair-like and medium tapered setae. Pedipalps: Densely clothed in the same setal color as the other legs; two spinose setae on the apical, prolateral femur, one spinose seta on the prolateral patella, and three spinose setae on the prolateral tibia. + + + +Figure 63. +Aphonopelma iodius +(Chamberlin & Ivie, 1939). +A-E +female specimen, APH_2016 A dorsal view of carapace, scale bar = 5.5mm B prolateral view of coxa I C ventral view of metatarsus III, scale bar = 4mm D ventral view of metatarsus IV, scale bar = 5mm E prolateral view of L pedipalp and palpal tibia. + + + + +Figure 64. +Aphonopelma iodius +(Chamberlin & Ivie, 1939). +A-H +cleared spermathecae A APH_0313 B APH_0985 C APH_0996 D APH_0997 E APH_1004 F APH_1006 G APH_1082 H APH_1083. + + + + +Figure 65. +Aphonopelma iodius +(Chamberlin & Ivie, 1939). +A-H +cleared spermathecae A APH_1091 B APH_1094 C APH_1220 D APH_2010 E APH_2016 F APH_2018 G APH_2030 H APH_3201. + + + + +Figure 66. +Aphonopelma iodius +(Chamberlin & Ivie, 1939). +A-C +cleared spermathecae A AUMS_2386 B AUMS_3310 C +angusi +allotype. + + + +Variation (19).Cl 8.657-21.4 (15.619 ++/- +0.68), Cw 7.51-18.6 (14.079 ++/- +0.6), LBl 1.322-2.73 (2.086 ++/- +0.09), LBw 1.578-3.25 (2.414 ++/- +0.11), F1 7.493-16.71 (12.928 ++/- +0.54), F1w 2.162-4.72 (3.69 ++/- +0.16), P1 3.155-7.60 (5.581 ++/- +0.26), T1 6.154-13.02 (10.428 ++/- +0.41), M1 4.613-11.89 (8.701 ++/- +0.43), A1 3.861-7.94 (6.577 ++/- +0.24), L1 length 25.276-56.01 (44.214 ++/- +1.84), F3 6.452-13.52 (11.003 ++/- +0.42), F3w 1.923-4.02 (3.281 ++/- +0.13), P3 2.599-6.65 (4.898 ++/- +0.22), T3 4.381-10.07 (8.138 ++/- +0.32), M3 4.766-11.50 (8.808 ++/- +0.36), A3 3.978-7.72 (6.494 ++/- +0.22), L3 length 22.176-48.63 (39.341 ++/- +1.49), F4 7.32-17.23 (13.256 ++/- +0.53), F4w 1.86-4.28 (3.405 ++/- +0.14), P4 3.187-6.67 (5.289 ++/- +0.21), T4 6.243-12.71 (10.466 ++/- +0.39), M4 7.325-15.1 (12.038 ++/- +0.43), A4 4.46-8.91 (7.111 ++/- +0.22), L4 length 28.535-58.40 (48.161 ++/- +1.72), SC3 ratio 0.724-0.949 (0.855 ++/- +0.02), SC4 ratio 0.593-0.829 (0.739 ++/- +0.02), Coxa I setae = tapered. Spermathecae variation can be seen in Figures 64-66. + + + + +Material +examined. + + +United States: Arizona: Coconino: House Rock - off 89A, 36.729414 -112.037386 5, 5337ft., [AUMS_3299, 3/7/89, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; [AUMS_2386, 2/7/89, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; off US-89A, Soap Creek Rd, 36.72439 -111.7556 1, 4211ft., [APH_0303, 8/10/07, 1 juv, Zach Valois, AUMNH]; Mohave: Road to Summit Springs,.25 miles from the UT/AZ border, 36.99566 -113.917793 4, 2533ft., [APH_2216, 19/10/1993, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, 0.3 miles S of UT/AZ border, 36.991946 -113.93678 4, 2450ft., [AUMS_3286, 6/10/93, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, Rd to Summit Springs, Old Hwy 91, 36.985176 -113.920017 5, 2398ft., [APH_2218, 20/10/1993, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, Rd to Summit Springs, Old How 91,.2 miles south of UT/AZ line, 36.996269 -113.918282 5, 2520ft., [APH_2258, 6/10/93, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; California: Alameda: 5 miles SE of Livermore at jct. of Mines Rd. and Del Valle Rd., 37.62253 -121.7028 4, 784ft., [APH_0180-0182, 5/9/07, 1♀, 2♂, Gilbert Quintana, AUMNH]; Berkeley, 37.871593 -122.272747 5, 164ft., [APH_2459, 24/9/1935, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; [APH_2460, 15/4/1936, 1♀, W.J. Baerg, AMNH]; Mines Rd, SE of Livermore, 37.5896 -121.6233 4, 1860ft., [APH_0404, 10/2008, 1♂, Mike Dame, AUMNH]; open area just SW jct Del Valle Rd and Mendenhall Rd [on trail along side of hill]; +37.604004 +-121.686283 4, 1396ft., [APH_0104-0106, 6/5/07, 3♀, Mike Dame, AUMNH]; Contra Costa: Mt. Diablo State Park, 37.920733 -121.941483 1, 589ft., [APH_0985-0986, 9/2009, 1♀, 1♂, Kyle Dickerson, AUMNH]; [APH_0988-0989, 10/2009, 1♀, 1♂, Cody Will, AUMNH]; [APH_2150, 10/1966, 3♀, Pat Warner, AMNH]; [APH_2151, 10/1967, 1♂, Pat Warner, AMNH]; Mt. Diablo State Park, 1.35 miles E Mt Diablo Scenic Blvd on Summit Rd, 37.868743 -121.923839 2, 2640ft., [APH_0102-0103, 15/4/2007, 2♀, Mike Dame, AUMNH]; S of Antioch/Brentwood, Camino Diablo Rd and Vasco Rd, 37.865167 -121.668233 1, 114ft., [APH_2031, 10/2010, 1♂, Mike Marciano, AUMNH]; Fresno: Coalinga, 36.09221 -120.42766 5, 904ft., [APH_0307-0308, 11/9/07, 2♀, Gilbert Quintana, AUMNH]; Imperial: E of 78/N of Picacho State Recreation Area, on Black Mountain Rd, 33.08765 -114.85645 1, 1564ft., [APH_2028, 9/10/10, 1♂, Peter Scott, AUMNH]; E of 78/N of Picacho State Recreation Area, on Black Mountain Rd, S of 1128, 33.06294 -114.83999 1, 1849ft., [APH_2029, 9/10/10, 1♂, Peter Scott, AUMNH]; Hwy 78, 2/10 mile E of jct with Ogilby Road (S34); 33.088327 -114.907025 1, 1025ft., [APH_3212, 15/11/2013, 1♂, W. Icenogle, AUMNH]; Inyo: along Waucoba Rd, 37.14549 -118.13074 2, 6034ft., [APH_1242-1243, 15/10/2010, 2♂, Anette Pillau, AUMNH]; Death Valley National Park, Daylight Pass Rd, near mile 11 +marker +, Amargosa Mtns, 36.75975 -116.9308 1, 3660ft., [APH_1080, 3/10/10, 1♂, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; [APH_1083, 4/10/10, 1♀, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; Death Valley National Park, Emigrant Canyon Rd, Panamint Mtns, 36.42383 -117.19048 1, 4064ft., [APH_1078-1079, 3/10/10, 2♂, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; [APH_1081-1082, 4/10/10, 2♀, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; Death Valley National Park, Mesquite Spring Campground Rd, Amargosa Mtns, 36.97597 -117.36693 1, 1930ft., [APH_1084, 4/10/10, 1♂, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; Deep Springs Valley, E of summit of Westgard Pass, 37.331895 -118.037264 5, 5110ft., [AUMS_2351, 16/10/1976, 1♂, Frank Hovore, AUMNH]; Westgard Pass Road, 2.3 miles E of Big Pine, 37.204734 -118.242688 4, 4318ft., [AUMS_2450, 20/10/1993, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Kern: 1 mile S of Maricopa, 35.051693 -119.410088 5, 1000ft., [AUMS_2370, 7/12/69, 1♂, E.K. Slope, AUMNH]; 12 miles WNW McKittrick, Temblor Range, 35.34526 -119.80899 4, 3258ft., [APH_0045, 16/4/2000, 1 juv, James Pitts, AUMNH]; outside Rosamond, in hills N or Tropico; off Mojave-Tropico Rd, 34.88133 -118.23144 1, 2637ft., [APH_3103, 19/7/2012, 1♂, Chris Hamilton, Amy Skibiel, AUMNH]; Red Mountain, 20 Mule Team Rd., 9.5 miles E of Cal City, 35.194924 -117.774276 5, 2867ft., [AUMS_2380, 20/10/1994, 1♂, unknown, AUMNH]; 7.6 miles east of California City on 20 Mule Team Parkway, 35.161453 -117.863179 4, 2539ft., [APH_2223, 20/10/1994, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; Lassen: 0.5 miles S of Hwy 395, N of Honey Lake, where Smoke Creek Ranch Rd. joins Hwy 395, 40.425413 -120.279483 4, 4539ft., [AUMS_2672, 9/9/00, 1♀, Stephan Wiley, AUMNH]; Los Angeles: Lang, 34.44549 -118.37372 5, 1862ft., [APH_0592, 13/6/2009, 1 juv, Anette Pillau, AUMNH]; E of Hi Vista, Avenue G, 34.734973 -117.765229 5, 3028ft., [APH_2720, 10/11/1963, 1♂, Geo. R. Wilson, AMNH]; Mono: Benton, 37.819199 -118.474701 5, 5410ft., [APH_2676, 27/9/1941, 1♂, L.A. Hart, AMNH]; [APH_2679, 7/10/43, 1♂, W.M. Pearce, AMNH]; Monterey: Arroyo Seco, foothills of Santa Lucia Range, 36.238772 -121.480529 5, 977ft., [AUMS_2489, 6/11/87, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Carmel, 36.555239 -121.923288 5, 233ft., [APH_2815, 6/1/54, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; Carmel Valley, 36.479925 -121.7328 5, 410ft., +[ +APH_2713, 11/1944, 1♂, Fred E. Samson, AMNH]; [APH_2718, 6/10/53, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; dry valley 14 miles southeast of Monterey, 36.471026 -121.702876 5, 850ft., [APH_2471, unknown, 1♂, E. Ricketts, AMNH]; Hastings Natural History Reservation, Robles del Rio, 36.367998 -121.563616 5, 1542ft., [APH_2698, unknown, 1♂, Linsdale, AMNH]; [APH_2714, unknown, 1♂, Linsdale, AMNH]; [APH_2721, unknown, 1♂, Linsdale, AMNH]; Los Laureles Grade Road, southeast of Monterey, 36.518052 -121.756652 5, 768ft., [APH_2696, 8/10/66, 1♂, P. Warner, AMNH]; Santa Lucia Range - Los Padres NF, Arroyo Seco (Campground); 36.231711 -121.485187 5, 944ft., [AUMS_3306, 6/11/87, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Lake Nacimiento, along Nacimiento Lake Dr. (Co. Hwy G14); west of Camp Roberts, W of San Miguel, 35.69067 -120.79972 1, 1007ft., [APH_2041, 7/12/11, 1 juv, Chris A. Hamilton, Jason Bond, AUMNH]; Lake Nacimiento, on Vista Rd at junction with Nacimiento Lake Dr. (Co. Road 19); west of Camp Roberts, W of San Miguel, 35.79395 -120.8727 1, 646ft., [APH_2042, 7/12/11, 1♀, Chris A. Hamilton, Jason Bond, AUMNH]; Riverside: 3 miles W of I-10 off Hwy 177, 33.705262 -115.451685 5, 1110ft., [AUMS_3326, 8/10/89, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Hexie Mountains, 33.830162 -115.983601 6, 3812ft., [APH_2220, 16/4/1989, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Joshua Tree National Monument, Pinto Basin, 33.925009 -115.700823 5, 1538ft., [AUMS_2371, 10/1962, 1♂, Van Hoose and Rainey, AUMNH]; Joshua Tree National Monument, west of Hidden Valley picnic area, 34.010251 -116.173413 5, 4163ft., [APH_2228, 5/8/87, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Joshua Tree National Park, Cottonwood Springs area, 33.74139 -115.811471 1, 3112ft., [APH_1500-1501, 5/9/12, 2♂, Brent E. Hendrixson, AUMNH]; [APH_2235, 25/2/1985, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; [APH_2240, 4/4/89, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Joshua Tree National Park, first roadside pullout stop from west entrance along Quail Springs Rd, along trail, 34.07156 -116.23954 4, 4040ft., [APH_0332-0334, 8/5/08, 3 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, Zach Valois, AUMNH]; Joshua Tree National Park, near Cottonwood Campground, 33.740358 -115.812362 1, 3046ft., [APH_1327, 31/7/2011, 1♀, Brent E. Hendrixson, Brendon Barnes, Nate Davis, Jake Storms, AUMNH]; Joshua Tree National Park, off El Dorado Mine Rd/Cottonwood Springs Rd, 1/2 mile N of Porcupine Wash, 33.84946 -115.78205 1, 2386ft., [APH_1008, 10/5/10, 1♀, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; Joshua Tree National Park, on service rd to maintenance area, off El Dorado Mine Rd, 34.02212 -116.01233 1, 3624ft., [APH_1005-1006, 10/5/10, 2♀, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; Joshua Tree National Park, picnic area, Covington Flats area, 34.027454 -116.30194 1, 4656ft., [APH_0491, 16/5/2009, 1 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, Bernadette DeRussy, Sloan Click, Jason Bond, AUMNH]; [APH_1198, 29/7/2010, 1♂, Brent E. Hendrixson, Brendon Barnes, Nate Davis, AUMNH]; Joshua Tree National Park, S border, 3.4 miles E of Cottonwood Springs Rd, 33.66753 -115.726563 4, 1750ft., [AUMS_2684, 23/8/1993, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; near Red Cloud Mine, 33.621745 -115.463815 6, 2068ft., [AUMS_2369, 25/10/1963, 1♂, unknown, AUMNH]; Orocopia Mtns, Joshua Tree National Monument exit, 33.613298 -115.853258 5, 2108ft., [AUMS_3288, 16/12/1989, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, +AUMNH +]; Pleasant Valley, Joshua Tree National Park, 33.914434 -116.052056 5, 3292ft., [AUMS_2683, 27/8/1966, 1♂, unknown, AUMNH]; Quail Springs Rd (National Park Drive); 3 miles NW of picnic area, 2.7 miles SE of monument entrance, Joshua Tree National Park, 34.068483 -116.235733 4, 3976ft., [APH_2247, 3/8/89, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; West Palm Springs Village, Cottonwood Rd, 1.4 miles N of I-10, San Bernardino Mtns, 33.938417 -116.697217 1, 1621ft., [APH_3136, 20/9/2013, 1♂, W. Icenogle, AUMNH]; Whitewater Canyon Rd area NW of Palm Springs, 33.965967 -116.651917 1, 1896ft., [APH_2036-2037, 7/27/11, 1♂, 1♀, Warren Burke, AUMNH]; Whitewater Canyon Rd, 3 miles N of junction with I-10, San Bernardino Mtns, 33.96385 -116.65105 1, 1878ft., [APH_3135, 8/9/13, 1♂, W. Icenogle, AUMNH]; San Benito: E of Hollister, off Quien Sabe Rd, E of Tres Pinos, 36.80288 -121.30323 1, 805ft., [APH_2001-2003, 10/10/10, 3♂, Chris A. Hamilton, RJ Adams, AUMNH]; Hwy 25, 1.5 miles N of Pinnacles turn off, old Horace Bacon Ranch, 36.535996 -121.148339 5, 1309ft., [AUMS_2495, 8/11/87, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; just E of Hwy-25, vicinity of Pinnacles National Monument, 36.49367 -121.06376 2, 1842ft., [APH_0151, unknown, 1 juv, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Pinnacles N. Mon.,.25 miles S of Hwy 25, 36.517091 -121.13235 4, 1197ft., [AUMS_2500, 7/11/87, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Pinnacles N. Mon., 8 miles N of turnoff from Hwy 25, 36.48708 -121.21392 4, 1458ft., [AUMS_2508, 7/11/87, 2♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Pinnacles, old Horace Bacon Ranch, 1.5 miles NE of Pinnacles, 36.535699 -121.148194 5, 1310ft., [AUMS_2494, 8/11/87, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; San Bernardino: 10 miles south of Barstow on Hwy 247, 34.754995 -117.007841 5, 2877ft., [APH_2252, 7/11/91, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Coxcomb Mountains, 8 miles west of Hwy 62, 33.990731 -115.430123 5, 3402ft., [APH_2230, 4/2/90, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; NE slope of Coxcomb Mountains, 8 miles west of Hwy 62, 34.048671 -115.335004 5, 1614ft., [APH_2227, 4/2/90, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Reche Rd, 4.5 miles east of Landers, 34.265929 -116.304316 4, 2730ft., [APH_2242, 18/10/1981, 1♂, W. Icenogle, AMNH]; 1.1 miles NE Lucerne Valley Cutoff along Hwy-247 (Barstow Rd); 34.614513 -116.968992 1, 3239ft., [APH_0758-0759, 5/10/09, 2 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, Thomas Martin, AUMNH]; 11 miles north of Buelton, 34.677234 -120.157748 5, 745ft., [APH_2701, 23/9/1965, 1♂, Jean and Wilton Ivie, AMNH]; 2.6 miles S Phelan Rd on Baldy Mesa Rd, 34.389973 -117.454903 1, 3974ft., [APH_1575-1576, 6/11/12, 2 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, AUMNH]; 3-4 miles E of Milpas Dr. Hwy, 18 miles S of Hwy by power lines, 34.525984 -116.984374 5, 3028ft., [AUMS_2521, 28/10/1989, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; 36 miles E of Joshua Tree National Monument headquarters, 34.124371 -115.408958 5, 1548ft., [AUMS_2540, 12/11/89, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; along Hwy-62, west of Coxcomb Mountains, 34.113767 -115.496503 1, 2252ft., [APH_1582-1583, 7/11/12, 1♂, 1 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, AUMNH]; Apple Valley, 34.500666 -117.172078 5, 2943ft., [AUMS_3312, 07/1973, 1♂, R. Estrada, AUMNH]; Coxcomb Mountains, 0.3 miles N of JTNM Boundary, 34.002853 -115.426675 4, 1892ft., [AUMS_2537, 24/11/1989, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; E of Twentynine Palms, off Hwy 62 - N +side +of road, near Joshua Tree National Park, 34.11838 -115.89557 1, 1660ft., [APH_3157-3160, 10/11/13, 2♂, 2 juv, Chris A. Hamilton, Brent E. Hendrixson, Molly Taylor, AUMNH]; Hesperia, 2.5 miles S Phelan Rd on Baldy Mesa Rd, 34.389771 -117.453406 1, 3692ft., [APH_1326, 31/7/2011, 1 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, Brendon Barnes, Nate Davis, Jake Storms, AUMNH]; Honda Road, 34.111948 -116.461021 6, 3403ft., [AUMS_2524, 14/4/1991, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Joshua Tree National Monument, W of small picnic area, Quail Mtn. area, 33.97058 -116.299793 5, 3977ft., [AUMS_2467, 10/8/89, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Lucerne Valley, Hwy 18 - 3 miles SE Hwy 247, High Desert, 34.423672 -116.918691 5, 3077ft., [AUMS_2381, 1/11/89, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; off Hwy 247, N of Lucerne Valley, 34.53291 -116.9397 1, 2850ft., [APH_3145, 10/11/13, 1♀, Chris A. Hamilton, Brent E. Hendrixson, Molly Taylor, AUMNH]; 3.6 miles W of Nipton on Nipton Rd., 35.45746 -115.3346 1, 2665ft., [APH_0318, 6/5/08, 1 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, Zach Valois, Stephen Rash, AUMNH]; Halloran Summit Road, 0.3 miles N I-15, 35.407038 -115.795374 1, 4079ft., [APH_0515, 21/5/2009, 1♀, Brent E. Hendrixson, Bernadette DeRussy, Sloan Click, AUMNH]; Kingston Range, Excelsior Mine Rd, 35.71268 -115.79702 2, 3601ft., [APH_1642, 26/11/2012, 1 juv, Matt Graham, AUMNH]; 100 yards N Havasu Lake Road, 2 miles SE of jct with Hwy 95, 34.532801 -114.624968 1, 1670ft., [APH_3201, 11/11/13, 1♀, W. Icenogle, AUMNH]; Eastern slope of Whipple Mountains, Black Landing road across from Gene Wash reservoir, 34.346101 -114.205737 5, 588ft., [AUMS_3310, 4/2/90, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Hwy 95, ~8 miles N of jct with Havasu lake Road, S of Lobecks Pass, 34.672525 -114.625747 1, 1578ft., [APH_3202, 16/11/2013, 1♂, W. Icenogle, AUMNH]; near Needles, on River Road, 2.5 miles S of I-40, 34.794722 -114.608835 5, 725ft., [AUMS_2349, 22/10/1976, 1♂, W. Icenogle, AUMNH]; off Hwy 62, W of Parker (Whipple Mtns); 34.2131 -114.42914 1, 987ft., [APH_1004, 9/5/10, 1♀, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; 3.1 miles east of Kramer Jct on Hwy 56, 34.983798 -117.484214 4, 2414ft., [APH_2250, 8/11/92, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; East Mojave Desert, Mid Hills near Providence Mountain, 35.22291 -115.457469 6, 4429ft., [APH_2222, 13/5/1989, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; Kelso-Cina Rd, 11.5 miles north of Kelso, 35.135929 -115.530791 4, 3382ft., [APH_2236, 1/11/92, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; Kelso-Cina Rd, 6.3 miles north of Kelso, 35.083174 -115.567666 4, 2926ft., [APH_2251, 1/11/92, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; Red Mountain, 1 mile west of Powerline Rd., 35.357912 -117.623138 5, 3664ft., [APH_2233, 26/10/1991, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; [APH_2234, 13/10/1992, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; Red Mountain, 1.5 miles west of Hwy 395, 35.358458 -117.640062 4, 3937ft., [APH_2237, 20/10/1991, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; Red Mountain, 1.5 miles west of Powerline rd., 35.352194 -117.606607 4, 3802ft., [APH_2221, 13/10/1991, 1♀, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; Red Mountain, 19 miles north of Kramer Junction, 1.5 miles west of Hwy 395, 35.361421 -117.621001 5, 3694ft., [APH_2255, 13/10/1992, 1♀, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; Red Mountain, 19 miles north of Kramer Junction, off Hwy 395, 35.353665 -117.617923 5, 3589ft., +[ +APH_2238, 14/10/1991, 1♀, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; [APH_2239, 12/10/1991, 1♀, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; [APH_2241, 26/10/1991, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; [APH_2246, 20/10/1991, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; Red Mountain, 20 miles north of Kramer Jct, 1.5 miles west of Hwy 395, 35.363666 -117.623444 5, 3694ft., [APH_2256, 22/1/1994, 1♀, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; Red Mountain, 20 miles north of Kramer Jct, on Power Rd, 35.361066 -117.615155 5, 3602ft., [APH_2243, 26/10/1991, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; Red Mountain, off Hwy 395, 35.36059 -117.615889 6, 3664ft., [APH_2231, 14/10/1991, 1♀, Thomas R. Prentice, AMNH]; East Mojave, Black Canyon Rd., 2 miles N of Essex Rd. jct., 34.937755 -115.413054 4, 3180ft., [AUMS_2372, 25/10/1992, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Red Mountain, 35.316678 -117.591078 6, 3164ft., [AUMS_2353, 14/10/1991, 1♀, Tom Prentice, AUMNH]; Red Mountain, ~19 miles N of Kramer Junction, 35.271452 -117.630077 5, 3220ft., [AUMS_2373, 3/10/92, 1♀, Thomas R. Prentice, AUMNH]; [AUMS_2375, 13/10/1991, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Red Mountain, ~19 miles N of Kramer Junction - Hwy 395, power line rd., 35.262031 -117.612309 5, 3059ft., [AUMS_2374, 3/10/92, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Red Mountain, ~19 miles N of Kramer Junction, 0.4 W of powerline, 35.250499 -117.616993 5, 3000ft., [AUMS_2378, 20/10/1991, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Red Mountain, 0.6 miles 20 Mule Team Rd., 35.251471 -117.617676 4, 3011ft., [AUMS_2377, 20/10/1991, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Red Mountain, 1 mile W of power line rd., 35.296474 -117.6267 5, 3230ft., [AUMS_2346, 26/10/1991, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Red Mountain, 19 miles N of Kramer Junction off Hwy 395, power line rd., 35.266359 -117.612937 5, 3081ft., [AUMS_2343, 17/10/1992, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Red Mountain, 19 miles N of Kramer Junction with 20 Mule Team Rd, 35.265871 -117.613745 5, 3081ft., [AUMS_2365, 19/10/1994, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Red Mountain, 3.6 miles W of power line road, on 20 Mule Team Rd., 35.25059 -117.620344 4, 3008ft., [AUMS_2342, 10/10/92, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Red Mountain, power line rd., mining mounds, 35.329506 -117.611623 5, 3364ft., [AUMS_2341, 20/10/1991, 1♂, Thomas R. Prentice, AUMNH]; 0.4 miles north of Covington Flats entrance, 34.04764 -116.316153 4, 4619ft., [APH_2229, 10/8/89, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; San Joaquin: Tracy - Carnegie SVRA, 37.653867 -121.627067 1, 1553ft., [APH_0990, 10/2009, 1♂, Cody Will, AUMNH]; San Luis Obispo: 7 miles northeast of Cholame, 35.774731 -120.181254 5, 1693ft., [APH_2671, 31/8/1958, 1♂, V. Roth, AMNH]; 7 miles NW of Paso Robles - Lake Nacimiento, 35.690839 -120.801114 5, 1108ft., [AUMS_2579, 10/1996, 1♂, Andrew Walters, AUMNH]; Chimineas Ranch, 35.17554 -120.01147 4, 2383ft., [APH_0078-0083, 25/3/2007, 1♂, 2♀, 3 juv, Alice Abela, AUMNH]; Cayucos, approx. 4 miles E on Old Creek Road, 35.47548 -120.85584 4, 297ft., [APH_0016, 15/8/2002, 1♂, Kelly C. Carroll, AUMNH]; E of Santa Maria, Hwy 166, 35.01671 -120.33505 1, 722ft., [APH_1092-1094, 9/10/10, 2♂, 1♀, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; Poly Canyon, California Polytechnic Univ., San Luis Obispo, 35.31598 -120.65632 4, 701ft., [APH_0077, 22/10/2006, 1 juv, +Alice +Abela, AUMNH]; San Mateo: 1000 block of Porto Marino Dr, San Carlos, 37.488576 -122.274238 2, 254ft., [APH_1371, 9/2011, 1♂, Julie Pitre, AUMNH]; Jasper Ridge, 37.40524 -122.2421 5, 417ft., [APH_2477, 13/11/1921, 1♀, 4♂, 1 juv, C.D. Duncan, AMNH]; Santa Barbara: 12 miles northeast of Los Olivos near Zaca Park, 34.722266 -120.035831 5, 1296ft., [APH_2709, 29/7/1961, 1♂, Roth and Roth, AMNH]; 5 miles south of Buelton, 34.560664 -120.190635 5, 564ft., [APH_2682, 23/9/1965, 1♂, Jean and Wilton Ivie, AMNH]; Figueroa Mountain Road, 34.72249 -119.96665 4, 4043ft., [APH_0036, 4/9/06, 1♂, Alice Abela, AUMNH]; [APH_0039-0040, 4/9/06, 2 juv, Alice Abela, AUMNH]; NE of Buellton, E on 154 at Hwy 101 split, 34.68066 -120.15461 1, 785ft., [APH_1091, 9/10/10, 1♀, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; Sycamore Canyon area, along Figueroa Mountain Rd, 34.727447 -120.098169 4, 1160ft., [APH_0418, 20/9/2008, 1♂, Anette Pillau, AUMNH]; Santa Clara: 0.37 miles SW jct Mines Rd on San Antonio Valley Rd, 37.4005 -121.4918 2, 2240ft., [APH_0407, 10/2008, 1♀, Mike Dame, AUMNH]; Mount Hamilton Area, 37.37888 -121.81057 4, 526ft., [APH_0051, 24/8/2001, 1 juv, Katrina Couch, Jerami Myers, AUMNH]; Palo Alto, 37.441872 -122.143006 5, 30ft., [APH_2695, Spring 1922, 1♂, R.W. Doane, AMNH]; Stanford, 37.424106 -122.166076 5, 92ft., [APH_2672, 1905, 1♀, unknown, AMNH]; Stanislaus: 0.06 miles W jct Adobe Canyon Rd on Del Puerto Canyon Rd, 37.4085 -121.4102 2, 1340ft., [APH_0405, 10/2008, 1♂, Mike Dame, AUMNH]; Del Puerto Canyon Rd, 37.4 -121.4438 4, 2050ft., [APH_0406, 10/2008, 1♂, Mike Dame, AUMNH]; Del Puerto Canyon, 25 miles west of Patterson, 37.42119 -121.374632 5, 1188ft., [APH_2677, 23/9/1967, 1♂, W.J. Turner, AMNH]; Frank Raines Park, 37.419831 -121.370933 1, 1200ft., [APH_2030, 10/2010, 1♀, Mike Dame, AUMNH]; Henry W Coe State Park, 37.18823 -121.54585 1, 2749ft., [APH_1095-1099, 10/10/10, 3♂, 2♀, Chris A. Hamilton, RJ Adams, AUMNH]; [APH_2000, 10/10/10, 1♂, Chris A. Hamilton, RJ Adams, AUMNH]; Nevada: Clark: 0.3 miles N Hwy-161 along dirt road, between Jean and Goodsprings, 35.81268 -115.38099 1, 3370ft., [APH_0358-0359, 12/5/08, 2 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, Zach Valois, AUMNH]; 1.9 miles E Hwy-160 on Trout Canyon Rd, 36.122811 -115.817589 1, 3463ft., [APH_1208-1210, 31/7/2010, 3 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, Brendon Barnes, Nate Davis, AUMNH]; 10 miles east of Las Vegas, 36.178731 -114.873725 5, 1447ft., [APH_2274, 07/1955, 1♂, W.J. Gertsch, AMNH]; 17-19 miles SE of Pahrump on Hwy 160, 36.029949 -115.702158 5, 3566ft., [APH_2224, 11/10/74, 1♂, W. Icenogle, AMNH]; 4.6 miles W US-95 (Searchlight) on Hwy-164, 35.488073 -114.996602 1, 3690ft., [APH_1220, 2/8/10, 1♀, Brent E. Hendrixson, Brendon Barnes, Nate Davis, AUMNH]; 7.7 miles W Searchlight on Hwy-164, 35.50444 -115.04914 1, 4057ft., [APH_0751, 3/10/09, 1♂, Brent E. Hendrixson, Thomas Martin, AUMNH]; 8.2 miles west of Searchlight, 2 miles north of Hwy 164, 35.496212 -115.213376 4, 4665ft., [APH_2248, 7/10/89, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; 8.2 miles west of Searchlight, on Hwy 164, 35.508562 -115.066862 4, 4249ft., [APH_2253, 7/10/89, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; along dirt road S of Hwy-95, 36.56321 -115.881585 1, 3701ft., [APH_1215, 1/8/10, 1♀, Brent E. Hendrixson, Brendon Barnes, Nate Da +vis +, AUMNH]; Boulder City and Hemenway Wash, 36.020585 -114.80798 5, 1575ft., [APH_2458, 10/1939, 5♂, B.E. Rees, AMNH]; Desert National Wildlife Refuge, open desert N of Mormon Well Rd, approx. 3 miles W Alamo Rd, 36.435992 -115.351558 2, 2968ft., [APH_0476, 13/5/2009, 1 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, Bernadette DeRussy, Sloan Click, Jason Bond, AUMNH]; Goodsprings, 35.832479 -115.434165 5, 3707ft., [APH_2731, 22/12/1946, 1♂, J.C. Madsen, AMNH]; Indian Springs, 1.5 miles WSW US-95 on Cold Creek Rd (near Southern Desert Correction Center); 36.51153 -115.570812 4, 3454ft., [APH_0183, 12/9/07, 1♂, Tim Filson, AUMNH]; [APH_0184, 8/8/07, 1♀, Tim Filson, AUMNH]; Muddy Mountains, 36.36485 -114.70364 2, 2851ft., [APH_1634, 10/11/12, 1 juv, Matt Graham, AUMNH]; Pahrump Rd, 17 to 19 miles SE of Pahrump, 36.04757 -115.726851 5, 3375ft., [AUMS_2608, 11/10/74, 1♀, W. Icenogle, AUMNH]; SE of Pahrump, Trout Canyon Rd, 36.12301 -115.82007 1, 3441ft., [APH_1075-1077, 2/10/10, 1♂, 2♀, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; Searchlight, 3 miles south on Hwy 95, 35.418906 -114.907457 5, 3176ft., [APH_2245, 2/10/81, 1♂, W. Icenogle, AMNH]; Christmas Tree Pass, Spirit Mtn, Lake Mead NRA, 35.26086 -114.73926 1, 3887ft., [APH_0313, 12/10/07, 1♀, Rick C. West, AUMNH]; [APH_0517, 24/5/2009, 1♀, Brent E. Hendrixson, Rick C. West, Bernadette DeRussy, AUMNH]; [APH_0996-0998, 6/5/10, 3♀, Chris A. Hamilton, Rick West, AUMNH]; Searchlight, 8.2 miles west on Hwy 164 in the foothills of highlands, 35.49844 -115.056633 4, 4108ft., [APH_2261, 7/10/89, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Lincoln: 8.3 miles S Alamo Canyon Rd on Hwy-93, 37.224912 -115.082582 1, 3160ft., [APH_0782, 9/10/09, 1 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, Thomas Martin, AUMNH]; Pioche, 37.929818 -114.451689 5, 6063ft., [APH_2728, 10/1941, 1♂, Mrs. Dibble, AMNH]; Nye: 0.8 miles S Hwy-95 along Rd-552, 36.582225 -115.944177 1, 3728ft., [APH_1547, 23/10/2012, 1 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, AUMNH]; Mercury, 36.66051 -115.994475 5, 3796ft., [APH_2724, 1962, 1♂, Gertsch, AMNH]; [APH_2726, 16/10/1961, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; [APH_2729, 10/11/60, 1♂, Gertsch, AMNH]; [APH_2732, 9/10/61, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; White Pine: Ely, 39.247265 -114.88863 5, 6437ft., [APH_2619, 24/8/1952, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; Utah: Beaver: Wah Wah Springs, 38.503218 -113.472862 5, 5233ft., [APH_2270, 07/1940, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; unknown, 38.326633 -113.28705 7, 6214ft., [APH_2272, 25/8/1946, 1♂, Chamberlin and Ivie, AMNH]; Box Elder: Brigham City, 41.510213 -112.015502 6, 4439ft., [APH_2283, 1927, 2♂, unknown, AMNH]; Honeyville, approx. 2 miles E I-15 at foothills of mtns, 41.63333 -112.04894 4, 5516ft., [APH_0006, 29/8/2004, 1♂, Andrea Strange, AUMNH]; Cache: Sardine Canyon, 41.581309 -111.932847 5, 4993ft., [APH_2734, 9/1947, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; Davis: Centerville, 40.918 -111.87216 5, 4393ft., [APH_2269, 3/10/36, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; Duchesne: Lower part of City Creek Canal, 40.202984 -110.413946 5, 5640ft., [APH_2280, 21/9/1942, 1♂, Wilton Ivie, AMNH]; Millard: W of Delta on Hwy 6/50, E of House Range Mtns around Antelope Springs Rd and Steamboat Springs Rd, 39.05897 -113.24963 1, 4784ft., [APH_2015, 23/9/2010, 1♂, Kelly Parr, AUMNH]; [APH_2016, 14/10/2010, 1♀, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; White Valley, 38.378831 +- +113.706023 5, 5682ft., [APH_2271, 12/8/40, 1♂, Chamberlin and Ivie, AMNH]; Piute: Marysvale, 38.44942 -112.2302 5, 5892ft., [APH_2736, 8/8/48, 1♂, Edw. Cormolly, AMNH]; Salt Lake: Big Cottonwood Canyon, 0.9 miles E Wasatch Blvd on UT-190, 40.62078 -111.77369 1, 5200ft., [APH_0050, 14/7/2006, 1♀, Brent E. Hendrixson, AUMNH]; Bluffdale, ~3 miles W I-15 on 14600 S, 40.48621 -111.91835 4, 4466ft., [APH_0004, 10/10/04, 1♂, Tiffany Blanchard, AUMNH]; East of Holladay, 40.671407 -111.782393 6, 5650ft., [APH_2267, 25/8/1941, 1♂, Chamberlin and Ivie, AMNH]; Mill Creek Canyon, 40.69001 -111.777132 5, 5240ft., [APH_2738, 08/1928, 1♂, R.V. Chamberlin, AMNH]; Mill Creek Canyon, Wasatch Mountains, 40.690695 -111.773522 5, 5249ft., [APH_2268, 5/8/42, 1♂, Chamberlin and Ivie, AMNH]; [APH_2277, 12/9/45, 1♂, Willis M. Creer, AMNH]; N Salt Lake City, 40.86167 -111.892803 6, 4902ft., [APH_2263, 210/2008, 2♂, unknown, AMNH]; Salt Lake City, 40.727231 -112.039815 6, 4245ft., [APH_2207, unknown, 2♂, unknown, AMNH]; [APH_2265, 22/9/1941, 4♂, Chamberlin and Ivie, AMNH]; [APH_2266, 08/1939, 2♂, unknown, AMNH]; [APH_2273, 10/1933, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; Salt Lake City, Bonneville Shoreline Trail, 40.763 -111.82 2, 5210ft., [APH_0788-0789, 28/8/2009, 2♂, Will Black, AUMNH]; unknown, 40.644188 -111.952249 7, 4409ft., [APH_2262, 1934, 3♂, unknown, AMNH]; San Juan: San Juan Bulge, 1/2 mile below Mexican Hat, 37.147965 -109.866298 5, 4114ft., [APH_2737, 18/7/1947, 1♀, Harold Higgins, AMNH]; Sevier: Oak Creek Canyon, 38.526922 -111.85269 5, 6998ft., [APH_2735, 24/8/1968, 1♂, G.F. Knowetn, AMNH]; Tooele: S of Delle, off I-80, 40.68329 -112.88853 2, 4920ft., [APH_0790, 17/10/2009, 1♂, DeAnn Neal, AUMNH]; South Mountain, 40.4651111 -112.4826666 5, 5406ft., [APH_0163, 19/8/2007, 1♂, Brian Nielsen, AUMNH]; South Willow Canyon, 40.5093342 -112.5349121 5, 5679ft., [APH_0161, 2/8/07, 1♂, Brian Nielsen, AUMNH]; [APH_0162, 9/8/07, 1♂, Brian Nielsen, AUMNH]; Stansbury Mountains, 40.5097653 -112.5324224 5, 5797ft., [APH_0155, 13/7/2007, 1♂, Brian Nielsen, AUMNH]; Stockton, 40.452722 -112.360782 6, 5121ft., [APH_2264, 1918, 2♂, unknown, AMNH]; Wendover, 40.737095 -114.03751 5, 4295ft., [APH_2733, 15/9/1942, 1♂, Don Nieleson, AMNH]; Utah: Box Elder Canyon, 40.473006 -111.750208 5, 5548ft., [APH_2739, 2/10/47, 2♂, S. H. Jenaera, AMNH]; Washington: 1 mile N of La Verkin, 37.230736 -113.271966 4, 3245ft., [APH_2282, 12/10/39, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; 10 miles south of Enterprise, 37.450725 -113.63881 5, 5791ft., [APH_2279, 14/10/1939, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, 37.0764081 -113.8702196 5, 4026ft., [APH_0154, 13/7/2007, 1♂, Brian Nielsen, AUMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, 0.5 miles W, 37.077649 -113.872749 6, 4135ft., [AUMS_2468, 1993, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, near Bulldog Knolls, 37.0184842 -113.8854744 5, 3086ft., [APH_0157, 13/7/2007, 1♀, Brian Nielsen, AUMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, Old Highway-91, 37.05399 -113.894229 5, 3445ft., [APH_0453, 11/10/06, 1♂, Brian Nielsen, AUMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, Old Hwy 91, 1.2 miles N of Utah/AZ line, 37.016981 -113.909332 4, 2960ft., [AUMS_2347, 12/10/93, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, +Rd +to Summit Springs, Old Hwy 91, 37.028247 -113.90558 5, 3038ft., [APH_2217, 6/10/93, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; [APH_2225, 19/10/1993, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, Rd to Summit Springs, Old Hwy 91,.2 miles north of UT/AZ line, 37.003736 -113.914265 5, 2635ft., [APH_2249, 19/10/1993, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, Rd to Summit Springs, Old Hwy 91, 1.7 miles north of UT/AZ line, 37.018438 -113.908722 5, 2884ft., [APH_2244, 19/10/1993, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, Rd to Summit Springs, Old Hwy 91, 2.5 miles north of UT/AZ line, 37.017035 -113.909593 5, 2520ft., [APH_2259, 12/10/93, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, Rd to Summit Springs, Old Hwy 91, 2.6 miles north of UT/AZ line, 37.036118 -113.902906 5, 3169ft., [APH_2257, 19/10/1993, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, Summit Spring, near Old Hwy-91, 37.088438 -113.871915 1, 4297ft., [APH_0779, 8/10/09, 1 juv, Brent E. Hendrixson, Thomas Martin, AUMNH]; Beaver Dam Mountains, Summit Springs, 37.066177 -113.885856 5, 3865ft., [APH_2254, 4/7/89, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; [APH_2260, 16/9/1989, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; [AUMS_3320, 5/10/95, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Enterprise, 37.573587 -113.719133 5, 5322ft., [APH_2284, 20/9/1939, 1♂, Ronn Hardy, AMNH]; Entrance to Zion National Park, 37.200215 -112.990135 5, 4006ft., [APH_2278, 16/8/1925, 1♂, A.M. Woodbury, AMNH]; just outside Zion National Park, Smith Mesa Road, 37.290592 -113.112587 5, 5230ft., [AUMS_2696, 22/8/1991, 1♀, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; just outside Zion National Park, Smith Mesa Road, 37.289355 -113.114065 5, 5230ft., [AUMS_2698, 23/8/1991, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; near Beaver Dam Mountains, 37.168672 -113.964461 6, 4852ft., [APH_2214, 10/1931, 1♂, A.M. Woodbury, AMNH]; near Gunlock, 37.2465941 -113.7766128 5, 3664ft., [APH_0153, 13/7/2007, 1♂, Brian Nielsen, AUMNH]; on Smith Mesa Rd., 1.2 miles W of junction with Kolob Reservoir Rd., 37.290556 -113.113463 4, 5225ft., [AUMS_2201, 23/9/1989, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Road to Summit Spring, Old Hwy 91, 2 miles north of UT/AZ line, 37.030356 -113.904284 4, 3074ft., [APH_2232, 6/10/93, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Smith Mesa campground, just outside Zion National Park boundary, 37.241343 -113.202808 5, 5002ft., [AUMS_2332, 22/8/1991, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Smith Mesa,.5 miles W of Zion National Park boundary, 37.204674 -112.993735 5, 3899ft., [AUMS_2580, 22/9/1989, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; St. George, 37.095278 -113.578056 6, 2638ft., [APH_2219, 25/10/1939, 1♂, unknown, AMNH]; Summit Spring, Old Hwy 91, 37.066904 -113.895177 5, 3773ft., [APH_2226, 5/10/93, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Summit Springs, Beaver Dam Mtns, 37.080788 -113.871741 6, 4140ft., [AUMS_2367, 3/7/89, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Welcome Spring Rd, Beaver Dam Mountains, 37.090134 -113.945487 5, 3835ft., [APH_2215, 23/11/1989, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AMNH]; Zion National Park, 37.208573 -112.982125 5, 3990ft., [APH_2275, unknown, 4♂, A.M. Woodbury, AMNH]; [APH_2281, 1927, 1♂, A.M. Woodbury, AMNH]; [AUMS_3300, unknown, 1♀, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]; Zion National Park, at Temple Sinawava site/trail, +37.285417 +-112.94755 1, 3865ft., [APH_2018, 18/10/2010, 1♀, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; Zion National Park, field next to Watchman employee housing neighborhood, 37.20527 -112.97655 1, 4004ft., [APH_2019-2020, 18/10/2010, 2♀, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; Zion National Park, near administrative buildings, 37.20841 -112.98188 1, 4010ft., [APH_2017, 18/10/2010, 1♂, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; Zion National Park, road to maintenance bldg. and Oak Creek employee housing neighborhood, 37.2099 -112.98579 1, 4031ft., [APH_2021, 18/10/2010, 1♂, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; [APH_2022, 19/10/2010, 1♂, Chris A. Hamilton, AUMNH]; Zion National Park, Smith-Mesa Rd, 37.290185 -113.113675 5, 5230ft., [AUMS_4194, 17/9/1989, 1♂, T.R. Prentice, AUMNH]. + + + +Distribution and natural history. + +Aphonopelma iodius +has a wide distribution that stretches across several diverse habitats from the Bay Area of California, south along the Coast Ranges across the Transverse Ranges, into the Mojave Desert (Fig. 1H), and north throughout the Great Basin Desert of Nevada, northwestern Arizona, and Utah (Fig. 67). +Aphonopelma iodius +has been found in the following Level III Ecoregions: Sierra Nevada, Central California Foothills and Coastal Mountains, Central California Valley, Southern California Mountains, Mojave Basin and Range, Sonoran Basin and Range, Central Basin and Range, Arizona/New Mexico Plateau, Northern Basin and Range, Wasatch and Uinta Mountains, and Colorado Plateaus. +Aphonopelma iodius +can be found in syntopy with a number of species across its distribution including +Aphonopelma atomicum +, +Aphonopelma eutylenum +, +Aphonopelma icenoglei +, +Aphonopelma johnnycashi +, +Aphonopelma joshua +, +Aphonopelma mojave +, +Aphonopelma prenticei +, and +Aphonopelma steindachneri +. The breeding season, when mature males abandon their burrows in search of females, occurs from late summer to early fall (generally +August-November +). + + + +Figure 67. +Aphonopelma iodius +(Chamberlin & Ivie, 1939). A distribution of known specimens B predicted distribution; warmer colors (red, orange, yellow) represent areas of high probability of occurrence, cooler colors (blue shades) represent areas of low probability of occurrence. + + + + +Conservation status. + +Aphonopelma iodius +is one of the most widespread and abundant species in the United States. The species is secure. + + + +Remarks. + +Aphonopelma iodius +is a problematic species. As presently defined, there are no major morphological features that can be used to distinguish +Aphonopelma iodius +from its sister lineages, and there is not enough evidence at this time to allow us to recognize cryptic diversity within the +Aphonopelma iodius +lineage (except for the geographically, genetically, and morphologically distinct +Aphonopelma johnnycashi +). During evaluation of traditional two-dimensional PCA morphospace and three-dimensional PCA morphospace (PC1~PC2~PC3), males and females of +Aphonopelma iodius +do not separate from any of the other species in the +iodius +species group ( +Aphonopelma chalcodes +, +Aphonopelma eutylenum +, +Aphonopelma johnnycashi +), but do separate from +Aphonopelma steindachneri +and their syntopic miniature tarantulas ( +Aphonopelma atomicum +, +Aphonopelma icenoglei +, +Aphonopelma joshua +, +Aphonopelma mojave +, and +Aphonopelma prenticei +) (see Suppl. material 2). PC1, PC2, and PC3 explain ≥95% of the variation in all analyses. + + +We examined the holotypes and freshly collected topotypic material of +Aphonopelma brunnius +, +Aphonopelma chamberlini +, +Aphonopelma iviei +, +Aphonopelma lithodomum +, +Aphonopelma smithi +, and +Aphonopelma zionis +. We also examined the holotypes and freshly collected topotypic material of three previously synonymized species: +Aphonopelma angusi +, +Aphonopelma melanium +, and +Aphonopelma nevadanum +. Our morphological and molecular analyses fail to recognize these nine species as separate, independently evolving lineages. As a consequence, we consider +Aphonopelma brunnius +, +Aphonopelma chamberlini +, +Aphonopelma iviei +, + +Aphonopelma +lithodomum + +, +Aphonopelma smithi +, and +Aphonopelma zionis +junior synonyms of +Aphonopelma iodius +and confirm the synonymizations of +Aphonopelma angusi +, +Aphonopelma melanium +, and +Aphonopelma nevadanum +proposed by +Prentice (1997) +. With additional sampling, however, it is possible that +Aphonopelma nevadanum +will be removed from synonymy. + + +Prentice formally changed the spelling of +Aphonopelma iodius +to +Aphonopelma iodium +because the gender is neuter. But, Chamberlin & Ivie (1939, pgs. 5-7) described +Delopelma (Aphonopelma) iodius +as "...easily distinguishable from +melanius +, which it apparently resembles most closely, by its rich rust color as contrasted with the dark metallic color of +melanius +." It is also noted that in +Chamberlin (1940) +, the key uses the word +"blackish" +to +describe +Aphonopelma melanius +(since synonymized). Because +Aphonopelma iodius +(the more rust colored of the two) and +Aphonopelma melanius +(the more blackish of the two) were described next to each other (Chamberlin 1939), +Aphonopelma iodius +is the correct neuter comparative (pers. comm. H.D. Cameron). + + +Mitochondrial DNA (CO1) identifies +Aphonopelma iodius +, as presently defined, as a polyphyletic species with individuals grouping together with members of +Aphonopelma chalcodes +and +Aphonopelma johnnycashi +(Fig. 7). A number of these lineages were previously identified as putative novel species ( +Hamilton et al. 2014 +). While nuclear DNA also identifies +Aphonopelma iodius +as a polyphyletic group, it is providing more insight into the evolutionary history of the +Aphonopelma iodius +lineages (Fig. 8). +Aphonopelma iodius +comprises two monophyletic groups (one comprising nominotypical +Aphonopelma iodius +material from Utah and another comprising all remaining material). More specimens need to be sequenced for future coalescent species-tree analyses and gene flow evaluation before taxonomic change can be recommended. These results once again highlight how CO1 is not effective at accurately delimiting species boundaries within this group. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9D/C4/379DC4B23E375F1AA30CD0CD77443F2C.xml b/data/37/9D/C4/379DC4B23E375F1AA30CD0CD77443F2C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..83d7d3f7ab7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9D/C4/379DC4B23E375F1AA30CD0CD77443F2C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ + + + +An updated checklist of the marine fish fauna of Redang Islands, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Du, Jianguo + + + +Author + +Loh, Kar-Hoe + + + +Author + +Hu, Wenjia + + + +Author + +Zheng, Xinqing + + + +Author + +Affendi, Yang Amri + + + +Author + +Ooi, Jillian Lean Sim + + + +Author + +Ma, Zhiyuan + + + +Author + +Rizman-Idid, Mohammed + + + +Author + +Chan, Albert Apollo + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2019 + +7 + + +47537 +47537 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e47537 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e47537 +1314-2828-7-e47537 +F940F7FD0A3541E98BDD33F83C2369D5 +AE1BE74780565E8D9B3522053F3B0983 + + + + +Myripristis kuntee Valenciennes, 1831 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +occurrenceID: BDJ_12482_105; +Location: +country: +Malaysia +; locality: +Redang islands +; +Identification: +identifiedBy: +Loh KH and Du Jianguo + + + + +Notes + +Yusuf et al. 2001 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9D/C8/379DC85E8C1AD3D93A9DA4EFE7935886.xml b/data/37/9D/C8/379DC85E8C1AD3D93A9DA4EFE7935886.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a7eda7e2166 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9D/C8/379DC85E8C1AD3D93A9DA4EFE7935886.xml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ + + + +Formicidae. + + + +Author + +Santschi, F. + +text + + +Voyage de Ch. Alluaud et R. Jeannel en Afrique Orientale (1911 - 1912). Résultats scientifiques. Hyménoptères + + +1914 + +2 + + +41 +148 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/8111/8111.pdf + +journal article +8111 + + + + +E. ( +Trachymesopus) Darwini Forel, var. africana +Forel. + + + +Ann. Soc. ent. Belgique, vol. 53, p. 51 (1909), [[queen]]. + + +Afrique orientale anglaise: Taveta (750 m., st. n° 65, mars 1912), 1 [[queen]]; - Voi (st. n° 60, mars 1912), 3 [[male]] que j'attribue avec. reserve a cette espece. Ils ressemblent beaucoup a la femelle sauf leurs caracteres males. Pris isolement ils ne peuvent etre identifies avec certitude, ainsi que c'est le cas des [[male]] suivants. + +La variete +africana +se trouve encore au Congo (Forel), au Dar Banda meridional (Dr Decorse). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9D/F6/379DF63E6FE79556FD342EFDC6394885.xml b/data/37/9D/F6/379DF63E6FE79556FD342EFDC6394885.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9894212de3b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9D/F6/379DF63E6FE79556FD342EFDC6394885.xml @@ -0,0 +1,506 @@ + + + +Revision der europäischen Gattungen und Arten der Familie Brachychthoniidae (Acari, Oribatei) Teil 1. Allgemeiner Teil: Brachychthoniidae Thor, 1934. Spezieller Teil: Liochthonius v. d. Hammen, 1959, Verachthonius nov. gen. und Paraliochthonius nov. gen. + + + +Author + +Moritz, M. + +text + + +Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin + + +1976 + +52 + + +27 +136 + + + + +http://unknown + +journal article +ORI10013 + + + + +Liochthonius leptaleus +nov. spec. +(Abb. 8 ab) + + + + +Material: + +ZMB +Nr. +422/IV/1 +: 1 Ad., +Holotypus +, +DDR +, +Elisenhain bei Eldena +, Kreis Greifswald, Buchen-Stieleichen-Hainbuchen-Wald, Zersetzungshorizont, +M. Moritz +leg. + +10. 12. 1957 + +. + +- + +ZMB +Nr. +422/IV/2-3 +: 2 Ad., +Paratypen +, +DDR +, vom selben Standort. + +- + +ZMB +Nr. +422/1123/5-27 +: 23 Ad., +Paratypen +, +Ungarn +, + +Csevharaszt, 45 km +suedl +. Budapest + +, Stieleichenklimaxwald auf +Flugsandduenen +(Pustaformation), Zersetzungshorizont, +M. Moritz +leg. + +1. 10. 1964 + +. + +- + +ZMB +Nr. +422/U38/28-30 +: 3 Ad., +Paratypen +, +Ungarn + +Voroesbereny +, Balaton + +, Flaumeneichenbuschwald auf Terra fusca, Zersetzungshorizont, +M. Moritz +leg. + +7. 10. 1964 + +. + +- + +ZMB +Nr. +422/B248/31 +: 1 Ad., +Paratypus +, +DDR +, Tiefensee, +Bezirk Frankfurt/Oder +, Traubeneichen-Buchen-Lindenwald +am Gransee +. +Suedexp +. Diluvialhang, Streuauflage, +M. Moritz +leg. + +20. 9. 1970 + +. + +- + +ZMB +Nr. +422/B269/32-58 +: 26 Ad., +DDR +, Feldberg, Kreis Templin, Rot- und Hainbuchenbestand +am O-exponierten Steilufer des Schmalen Luzin +, Streuauflage, +M. Moritz +leg. + +5. 9. 1974 + +. + + + +Holotypus, Locus typicus: Der Holotypus ist im Zoologischen Museum des Museums +fuer +Naturkunde der +Humboldt-Universitaet +Berlin deponiert. + + +Der Locus typicus ist DDR, Elisenhain bei Eldena, Kreis Greifswald. Der Holotypus stammt aus einem Buchen-Stieleichen-Hainbuchenwald mittleren Alters, in dem die Esche vereinzelt eingeschaltet ist. Eine Strauchschicht fehlt. Die Bodenprobe wurde einem moderartigen Zersetzungshorizont auf braunem bis schwarzbraunem, schwach lehmigem Feinsand mittleten Wassergehaltes am +10. 12. 1957 +entnommen (vgl. Moritz 1963, p. 153, Standort IV). + + + + +Beschreibung: Die +Koerperfarbe +ist gelbbraun bis +weisslich +. Das Opisthosoma ist vom Prosoma durch Schulterecken abgesetzt. Alle Dorsalborsten sind lang und mit einer breiten velumartigen Randerweiterung versehen. Die Dorsalflecke sind in der Regel undeutlich. Der +Koerperhabitus +erinnert an die Vertreter der +horridus-Gruppe +. + + +Das Prodorsum ist so lang wie breit oder um ein geringes +laenger +. Das Rostrum ist +staerker +aufgewoelbt +und vom Prodorsum deutlich abgesetzt. Alle Prodorsumborsten sind deutlich erweitert. Die Rostral- und Lamellarhaare sind fast gleichlang. Die Interlamellarhaare sind mit 15 bis 18 +ym +am +kuerzesten +. Der Abstand der Lamellarhaare voneinander ist nur wenig geringer als der der Interlamellarhaare. Die Spitzen beider Borstenpaare sind aufeinandergerichtet. + + +Der Sensillus besitzt eine kurze und breite +spindelfoermige +Keule, die +kuerzer +als der Stiel ist. Sie ist mit nur wenigen dicken und starren Stachelborsten besetzt. 4 bis 5 Stachelborsten stehen in einer Reihe. Die dorsalen Stachelborsten sind +laenger +als die lateralen und ventralen. + + + +Abb +. 8. +Liochthonius leptaleus +nov. spec. +, Holotypus. a Dorsalansicht und Sensillus, b Lateralansicht. + + + +Der +Exobothridialhoecker +ist klein. Von seiner Vorderkante +verlaeuft +wie bei allen Arten der Gruppe eine Linie, verursacht durch den steileren Abfall des seitlichen Prodorsum, bis zu den Lamellarhaaren. Der Seitenrand des Prodorsum ist zwischen der rostralen +Aufwoelbung +und dem +Exobothridialhoecker +staerker +vorgewoelbt +. + + +Die interbothridialen Dorsalflecke nehmen von vorne nach hinten an +Groesse +gleichmaessig +ab. Sie sind jeweils um ihren Durchmesser voneinander enfernt. Das vordere Paar liegt zwischen den Interlamellarhaaren. + + +Das Opisthosoma besitzt deutliche Schulterecken. Zwischen seinen 3 Abschnitten ist es +aehnlich +wie bei den Vertretern der +horridus-Gruppe +staerker +eingezogen. Die Dorsalborsten sind mit einem breiten Randvelum versehen. Besonders stark ist auch die Velumbildung bei den Borsten des Pygidium, die auch +staerker +gegen die +Koerperoberflaeche +gekruemmt +sind. Die Randvela verlaufen in fast gleicher Breite bis zum Borstenende, wo sie etwas gezackt erscheinen. Die Borsten des vorderen Notogasterschildes sind relativ +lang +. Die d-Borsten +ueberragen +den Schildhinterrand um fast ihre halbe +Laenge +. Die e1- Borsten +ueberragen +den Hinterrand ihres Notogasterschildes um mehr als ihre halbe +Laenge +. Die Borsten der 2 hinteren Notogasterabschnitte stehen auf niedrigen +Insertionshoeckern +. + + + +Tabelle +4. +Liochthonius leptaleus +nov. spec. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
EmTaCeDurchschnittMin.-Max.Holotypus
+Gesamtlaenge +165,2160,0 - 175168,7
+Laenge +Prodorsum +63,965,0 - 70,070,0
+Laenge +Na +42,540,0 - 45.043.5
Breite Prodorsum63,360,0 - 70,065,0
Breite Na89,183,7 - 100,090,0
+Sensilluslaenge +33,031,2 - 35.033.8
+Keulenlaenge +15,513,7 - 17,515.2
Keulenbreite5,0-5,0
Abstand ro11,110,0 - 12,012,0
Abstand la18,017,5 - 20,0-
Abstand ila20,319,2 - 21,221,2
Abstand c135.633.2 - 38,237.5
Abstand e123,020,7 - 23.7-
+Laenge +ro +20,418,7 - 22,522,5
+Laenge +la +20,120,0 - 21,221,2
+Laenge +ila +16,715,0 - 18,017.5
+Laenge +c1 +18,417,0 - 20,020,0
+Laenge +e1 +21,318,7 - 23,723,7
Abstand la: ro1,62EmTaCe-
Abstand ila: la1,13EmTaCe-
+Laenge +e1: Na +0,54EmTaCe0,54
+Laenge +Na: Abstand la +2,36EmTaCe-
+Laenge +Na: Abstand c1 +1,25EmTaCe1,16
+ + +Der vordere Pleuralschild Pl1 besitzt einen konkaven Vorderrand und ist dem von +L. brevis +sehr +aehnlich +. + + + + +Systematische Stellung: +Liochthonius leptaleus +n. sp. +ist von +L. brevis +ausser +durch die geringere +Groesse +durch die +kuerzeren +, aber viel breiteren Dorsalborsten und die nur mit wenigen Stachelborsten besetzte Sensilluskeule sowie durch die Anordnung der interbothridialen Maculae zu unterscheiden. + + +Von dem offensichtlich nahe verwandten, etwas kleineren +L. propinquus +unterscheidet sich die Art u. a. durch die breitere und wenig bestachelte Sensilluskeule und die +laengeren +c- und d-Borsten. Die d-Borsten +ueberragen +z. B. bei +L. propinquus +nicht den Hinterrand des Notogasterschildes. + + +Von +Liochthonius dilutus +n. sp. +ist die Art durch die geringere +Groesse +, die Sensilluskeule und die Stellung der interbothridialen Maculae zu trennen. + + + + +Die vorliegenden Funde der Art +beschraenken +sich +zunaechst +auf mehr oder weniger bewaldete sandig-lehmige diluviale Standorte mit mittlerem, aber +staerker +schwankendem Wassergehalt durch Insolation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9D/F8/379DF8565A945DFCB22338E20F450FF9.xml b/data/37/9D/F8/379DF8565A945DFCB22338E20F450FF9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..54ae209cd8d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9D/F8/379DF8565A945DFCB22338E20F450FF9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ + + + +The terrestrial microsnail genus Aulacospira Moellendorff, 1890 (Eupulmonata, Stylommatophora, Hypselostomatidae) in Thailand with key to Thai species + + + +Author + +Dumrongrojwattana, Pongrat +Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Burapha University, Bangsaen, Chonburi 20131 Thailand +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2544-6979 +oldsnails@hotmail.com + + + +Author + +Tanmuangpak, Kitti +Program of Biology, Department of Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Loei Rajabhat University, Loei 42000 Thailand + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +980 + + +23 +42 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.980.54100 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.980.54100 +1313-2970-980-23 +78EED563089C4804A91087DAF1B3D2EB +FD77063CAE3F5DDFA5D3A7714A674E83 + + + + +Aulacospira panhai Dumrongrojwattana, 2008 +Figures 2E +, 3C + + + + +Aulacospira panhai +Dumrongrojwattana 2008 +: 57-59, fig. 1. + + + +Type locality. + +Thailand, Khaopratun, an isolated limestone hill of Rayong Province; +13°07'19"N +, +101°36'03"E +. + + + +Types examined. + + +Holotype +. + +ZRCBUU 0220. + +Paratype +. + +ZRCBUU 0293. + + + +Material examined. + +ZRCBUU 0353 (3 shells); Thailand, Khao Cha-ang Hayod, an isolated limestone hill of Chonburi Province; +13°09'40.6"N +, +101°35'51.4"E +; 31.i.2013; leg. Dumrongrojwattana, P. ZRCBUU 0393 (5 shells); Thailand, Khao Cha-ang Hayod, an isolated limestone hill of Chonburi Province; +13°09'40.6"N +, +101°35'51.4"E +; 23.vi.2014; leg. Dumrongrojwattana, P. ZRCBUU 0394 (2 shells); Thailand, Khaopratun, an isolated limestone hill of Rayong Province; +13°07'19"N +, +101°36'03"E +; 31.i.2013; leg. Dumrongrojwattana, P. ZRCBUU 0495 (2 shells); Thailand, Khao Cha-ang Hayod, an isolated limestone hill of Chonburi Province; +13°09'40.6"N +, +101°35'51.4"E +; 15. x. 2016, leg. Dumrongrojwattana, P. + + + +Measurements. +H = 2.47-2.83 mm, W = 1.45-1.70 mm. + + +Diagnosis. + +Shell minute, semi-depressed; spire distorted; brownish. Protoconch granulose; teleoconch smooth; the first two whorls slightly flatten; the last two whorls large and inflated; tuba short and downwardly directed; peristome expanded; aperture with six teeth, parietal and infraparietal lamellae, upper palatal and lower palatal and basal plicae, and columella lamellae (Fig. +2E +). + + + +Radula. + +As in + +A. depressa + +(Fig. +3C +). + + + +Reproductive anatomy. +Unknown. + + +Distribution. + +Chonburi and Rayong provinces, eastern Thailand (Fig. +1 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9E/6E/379E6EC8796F2AB8C2C0724B328ADF18.xml b/data/37/9E/6E/379E6EC8796F2AB8C2C0724B328ADF18.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..533163d3be3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9E/6E/379E6EC8796F2AB8C2C0724B328ADF18.xml @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part L) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +610 +650 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + +Lichen olivaceus +Linnaeus, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 1143. 1753, +nom. cons. + + + +"Habitat in Europae rupibus. arboreus & rupestris." RCN: 8185. + + + +Conserved type ( +Jorgensen +& al. in +Taxon +43: 652. 1994): Sweden. +Haerjedalen +, +Fjellnaes +, +Vrang +in Crypt. Exsicc. Mus. Hist. Nat. Vindob. No. 3063 (UPS). + + + + +Current name: + +Melanohalea olivacea +(L.) O. Blanco + +& al. ( +Parmeliaceae +). + + + + +Note: +Howe (in +Bull. Torrey Bot. Club +37: 201. 1912) typified the name on 1273.66 (LINN), a collection of + +Parmelia pulla +Ach. + +(see review by +Jorgensen +& al. in +Bot. J. Linn. Soc. +115: 332, 378, f. 45. 1994). The same authors successfully proposed the name for conservation with a conserved type. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9E/7A/379E7A83353E4C5123EEF5A028495BEC.xml b/data/37/9E/7A/379E7A83353E4C5123EEF5A028495BEC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5bc8e642b49 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9E/7A/379E7A83353E4C5123EEF5A028495BEC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Family +Discolomatidae Horn, 1878 + + + + +Discolomidae +G. H. Horn, 1878: 557 [stem: Discolomat-]. Type genus: +Discoloma +Erichson, 1845. Comment: incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/9E/A4/379EA44C06D66EE08D47F141109DF4C3.xml b/data/37/9E/A4/379EA44C06D66EE08D47F141109DF4C3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a8f2121c0a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/9E/A4/379EA44C06D66EE08D47F141109DF4C3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Brassicaceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +480 +566 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Cardamine alpina +Willd. + + + + + +Artbeschreibung: +2-10 cm +hoch, unverzweigt, kahl. +Grundstaendige +Blaetter +rosettig +gehaeuft +, lang gestielt, +ungeteilt, oval bis rundlich +, manchmal angedeutet 3lappig. +Staengelblaetter +1-3, +ungeteilt +, am Grund +verschmaelert +oder kurz gestielt. +Blueten +weiss. +Kronblaetter +3,5-5 mm +lang. +Fruechte +stabfoermig +, gerade, +10-20 mm +, Stiele +hoechstens +halb so lang. + + + + +Bluetezeit +: 6-7 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz: +Schneetaelchen +, feuchte Felsen, Quellen / alpin / A + + + + +Verbreitung global: +Alpin-pyrenaeisch + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F +sehr feucht; Feuchtigkeit +maessig +wechselnd ( ++/- +1-2 Stufen) +Lichtzahl LhellSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rsauer (pH 3.5-6.5)Temperaturzahl Talpin und nival (von der Baumgrenze bis zur Schneegrenze)
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +naehrstoffarm + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subozeanisch (hohe Luftfeuchtigkeit, geringe Temperaturschwankungen, eher milde Winter)
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Alpen-Schaumkraut +Nom +francais +: + +Cardamine des Alpes +Nome + +italiano: +Billeri alpino + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A0/47/37A047838BF558EC8919625E19EC1C9E.xml b/data/37/A0/47/37A047838BF558EC8919625E19EC1C9E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5a43298f11a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A0/47/37A047838BF558EC8919625E19EC1C9E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +An updated checklist of ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Bulgaria, after 130 years of research + + + +Author + +Lapeva-Gjonova, Albena +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-0768 +Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria +gjonova@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Antonova, Vera +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3210-5264 +Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria +vera_antonova@yahoo.com + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2022 + +2022-11-09 + + +10 + + +95599 +95599 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e95599 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e95599 +1314-2828-10-e95599 +49BF0529531D5DC3B206BC0B1137798B + + + + +Cryptopone ochracea (Mayr, 1855) + + + +Notes + +Atanassov and Dlusskij (1992) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A0/4E/37A04E733EA45D35BEE7D8CCFD52DAE8.xml b/data/37/A0/4E/37A04E733EA45D35BEE7D8CCFD52DAE8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..211c17b5e83 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A0/4E/37A04E733EA45D35BEE7D8CCFD52DAE8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + +Birds from the Azores: An updated list with some comments on species distribution + + + +Author + +Barcelos, Luis MD + + + +Author + +Rodrigues, Pedro R + + + +Author + +Bried, Joel + + + +Author + +Mendonca, Enesima P + + + +Author + +Gabriel, Rosalina + + + +Author + +Borges, Paulo Alexandre Vieira + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +6604 +6604 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6604 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6604 +1314-2828-3-6604 + + + + +Melospiza lincolnii (Audubon, 1834) + + + +Ecological interactions + +Native status +Nearctic + + + +Distribution +COR + + +Notes +Occasional Migrant. New Azores Record + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A0/BE/37A0BE84A9117B14909E6A8EF71AF58F.xml b/data/37/A0/BE/37A0BE84A9117B14909E6A8EF71AF58F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1a509fa09b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A0/BE/37A0BE84A9117B14909E6A8EF71AF58F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ + + + +Annotated type catalogue of the Bulimulidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Orthalicoidea) in the Natural History Museum, London + + + +Author + +Breure, Abraham S. H. +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, Leiden, the Netherlands +bbreure@xs4all.nl + + + +Author + +Ablett, Jonathan D. +Natural History Museum, Division of Higher Invertebrates, London, SW 7 5 BD, UK + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2014 + +2014-03-21 + + +392 + + +1 +367 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.392.6328 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.392.6328 +1313-2970-392-1 +FFCF5A59FFB1FF93FFF10B43FFAFFFF5 +578044 + + + + +Bulimus ochraceus Morelet, 1863 +Figs 71E-F +, 71J +, L42viii + + + + +Bulimus ochraceus +Morelet 1863 +: 176, pl. 7 fig. 6; +Breure 1979 +: 86. + + +Scutalus (Vermiculatus) ochraceus +; +Breure 1978 +: 180 (lectotype designation). + + + +Type locality. + +[Peru, Dept. Cuzco] +"a +Sorai +et +a +Salcantai" +. + + + +Label. + +"Perou +. +Sorai" +, in +Morelet's +handwriting. + + + +Dimensions. +"Long. 37-40; diam. 17-18 mill."; figured specimen herein H 36.0, D 18.5, W 5.3. + + +Type material. +NHMUK 1893.2.4.164, lectotype; 1893.2.4.165-166, two paralectotypes (ex Morelet). + + +Remarks. + +Morelet remarked that this taxon occurs in the lower part of 'puna +brava' +, i.e. at high elevations. The type locality is thus at the slopes of Nevado Salcantay +and +near Soray, which is at ca. 4100 m elevation in Dept. Cuzco, to which the type locality is now restricted. + + + +Current systematic position. + +Bulimulidae +, + +Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) ochracea + +(Morelet, 1863) ( +comb. n. +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A1/52/37A152E29B501829BDAEE0B6BD3E3069.xml b/data/37/A1/52/37A152E29B501829BDAEE0B6BD3E3069.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f01bb4c7ea8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A1/52/37A152E29B501829BDAEE0B6BD3E3069.xml @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Trigla hirundo +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + +T. digitis ternis, linea laterali aculeata. + +Art. gen. +44. +syn. +73. Trigla capite aculeato, appendicibus utrinque tribus ad pinnas pectorales. @/D. 9, 18. P. 10. V. 1/6. A. 19. C. 12. + + +Fn. svec. +281. +It. Wgot. p. +176. idem. @/D. 7, 19. P. 9. V. 6. A. 18. C. 11. + + + + +Habitat in +Oceano Atlantico. + + + + +Pinnae +pectorales nigrae. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A1/95/37A19566A2AD77D0EC231401F14AEFB8.xml b/data/37/A1/95/37A19566A2AD77D0EC231401F14AEFB8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dea7a2ff024 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A1/95/37A19566A2AD77D0EC231401F14AEFB8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ + + + +Order Carnivora + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +532 +628 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Meles meles +(Linnaeus 1758) + + + + + + + +[Ursus] meles +Linnaeus 1758 + +, +Syst. Nat., 10th ed., Vol. 1: 48 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +"Europa inter rimas rupium et lapidum," restricted by + +Thomas (1911 +a +) + +to " +Upsala +" [ +Sweden +] + +. + + + + +Vernacular Names: +European Badger +. + + + + +Subspecies: +: + + +Subspecies + +Meles meles +subsp. +meles +Linnaeus 1758 + + + +Subspecies + +Meles meles +subsp. +arcalus +Miller 1907 + + + +Subspecies + +Meles meles +subsp. +canescens +Blanford 1875 + + + +Subspecies + +Meles meles +subsp. +heptneri +Ognev 1931 + + + +Subspecies + +Meles meles +subsp. +marianensis +Graells 1897 + + + +Subspecies + +Meles meles +subsp. +milleri +Baryshnikov, Puzachenko and Abramov 2003 + + + +Subspecies + +Meles meles +subsp. +rhodius +Festa 1914 + + + +Subspecies + +Meles meles +subsp. +severzovi +Heptner 1940 + + + + + +Distribution: +Afghanistan +, +Albania +, +Austria +, +Belgium +, +Bosnia and Herzegovina +, +Bulgaria +, +China +( +Xinjiang +), Crete, +Croatia +, +Czech Republic +, +Denmark +, +Estonia +, +Finland +, +France +, +Germany +, +Great Britain +, +Greece +, +Hungary +, +Iran +, +Iraq +, +Ireland +, +Israel +, +Italy +, +Latvia +, +Lithuania +, +Luxembourg +, Macedonia, +Moldova +, +Netherlands +, +Norway +, +Poland +, +Portugal +, +Romania +, +Russia +(eastward up to Volga River), +Serbia and Montenegro +, +Slovakia +, +Slovenia +, +Spain +, +Sweden +, +Switzerland +, +Ukraine +. + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +– Lower Risk (lc). + + + + +Discussion: +Reviewed by +Petrov (1953) +and Heptner et al. (1967). Synonyms allocated according to Heptner et al. (1967) and +Abramov (2001) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A2/01/37A2014070DECF9A3C0BB8B36F03BEFE.xml b/data/37/A2/01/37A2014070DECF9A3C0BB8B36F03BEFE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6236d859414 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A2/01/37A2014070DECF9A3C0BB8B36F03BEFE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Sedum acre +, +spec. nov. + + + + +12. Sedum foliis subovatis adnato-sessilibus gibbis erectiusculis alternis, cyma trifida. +Hort. cliff. 177. +Fl. svec. 389. +Mat. med. 218. +Roy. lugdb. 456. + + +Sempervivum minus vermiculatum acre. +Bauh. pin. 283. + + +Illecebra s. Sempervivum tertium. +Dod. pempt. 129. + + + + +Habitat in +Europae +campis siccissimis sterilissimis. ♃ + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A2/4D/37A24DD5572A2656DBA0E6528F8D48E7.xml b/data/37/A2/4D/37A24DD5572A2656DBA0E6528F8D48E7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6db0ab1e4fa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A2/4D/37A24DD5572A2656DBA0E6528F8D48E7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Hydra polypus +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + +H. nuda, tentaculis septenis capillaribus. + +Fn. svec. +1283. Hydra viridis, corpore aequali, tentaculis corpore brevioribus. + + +Amoen. acad. +2. +p. +63. Polypus subcylindricus, ore setis senis radiato. + + +Leuw. act. angl. +261. +f. +1, 2, 3, 4. & 283. +p. +1494. + + +Trembl. polyp. t. +10. +f. +8, 9. + + +Baker. polyp. +1714. +oct. t. +1-22. + + +Baeck Act. Stockh. +1746. +t. +6. +f. +1, 2. + + +Ellis corall. t. +26. +f. C. + + + +Schaeff +. monogr. + +1754. +t. +1. +f. +1-15. & +t. +2, 3. + + + + +Habitat in +Aquis +dulcibus. + + + + +Variat colore +; viridis +certe tentaculis brevissimis gaudet +; +reliqui longioribus +; +an itaque sufficienter specie distinguendae +? + + +Haec, januam aperiente +Tremblaeo, +viam ad Zoophyta +minutissima indigitabat. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A2/F0/37A2F0CE5322518A87E26C9614972568.xml b/data/37/A2/F0/37A2F0CE5322518A87E26C9614972568.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c10a0942846 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A2/F0/37A2F0CE5322518A87E26C9614972568.xml @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ + + + +Revision of the genus Eotrechus Kirkaldy (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Gerridae), with descriptions of six new species + + + +Author + +Tran, Anh Duc +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9605-0739 +Faculty of Biology, University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 334 Nguyen Trai, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi, Vietnam +tran.anhduc@hus.edu.vn + + + +Author + +Zettel, Herbert +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7760-0472 +Herbert Zettel, 2 nd Zoological Department (Entomology), Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria + + + +Author + +Sites, Robert W. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3895-813X +Enns Entomology Museum, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA + +text + + +Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift + + +2023 + +2023-03-16 + + +70 + + +1 + + +69 +111 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.70.97117 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.70.97117 +1860-1324-1-69 +99BBA4C8ED2048879952B61CC25309D4 +CA0CBE818BFA5DFA80DBD42521D5DBE3 + + + + +Eotrechus terrestris Andersen, 1982 + + + + +Fig. 26 + + + + +Eotrechus terrestris +Andersen, 1982: 15, figs 17, 23 (type locality: Sikkim, India). + + +Eotrechus terrestris +: +Andersen (1998 +: 6) (checklist); +Tran and Zettel (2006 +: 49-50, figs 21-24) (record Nepal, descriptive notes). + + + +Material examined. + + + +Paratypes + +: +India +(?) • +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +(apterous); "Taken from wet path in copula, + +4600ft. + +, 9.VII.18 / +H. Stevens. Brit. Mus. +1922-307"; BMNH + +. + + + +Other material. + + +Nepal +• +2 ♂♂ +(apterous); +Lanqtanq National Park +, +Lanqtanq valley +, +Rimche +env.; +13 Oct. 2002 +; + +P. +Sramek + +leg.; NHMW + +. + + + +Diagnosis. + +Size: apterous males, length 7.30-7.60, width 2.30-2.34; apterous female, length 8.20, width 2.70. Mesosternum ca. 2.8 +x +length of metasternum. Male: fore femur moderately incrassate, length about 5.1 +x +width, simple, flexor side without stiff setae; abdomen moderately long, sterna VI and VII medially grooved (more broadly grooved in sternum VII). Male genitalia: segment VIII relatively large; pygophore with two long, slender posterolateral projections, apices of projections pointed; proctiger with narrowly rounded apex; proctiger and projections of pygophore slanting dorsad. Female: similar to + +E. longipes + +. + + + +Remarks. + +See Remarks under + +E. anderseni + +sp. nov. + + + +Distribution. + +India: West Bengal, Sikkim ( +Andersen 1982 +); Nepal ( +Tran and Zettel 2006 +) (Fig. +26 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A3/5B/37A35BD576749A8CA006440392969241.xml b/data/37/A3/5B/37A35BD576749A8CA006440392969241.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..95440860e5e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A3/5B/37A35BD576749A8CA006440392969241.xml @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - aculeates (Apoidea, Chrysidoidea and Vespoidea) + + + +Author + +Else, George R. + + + +Author + +Bolton, Barry + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8050 +8050 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8050 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8050 +1314-2828--8050 + + + + +Anthophora (Dasymegilla) quadrimaculata (Panzer, 1798) + + + + +Apis quadrimaculata +Panzer, 1798 + + +subglobosa +(Kirby, 1802, +Apis +) + + + +Distribution +England, Wales + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A5/09/37A5099E8B63FDE494166E61D4A6D859.xml b/data/37/A5/09/37A5099E8B63FDE494166E61D4A6D859.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e32ef66388f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A5/09/37A5099E8B63FDE494166E61D4A6D859.xml @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ + + + +Order Soricomorpha + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +220 +311 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Cryptotis tropicalis +Merriam 1895 + + + + + + + +Cryptotis tropicalis +Merriam 1895 + +, +N. Amer. Fauna, 10: 21 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +Guatemala +, Cobán. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Tropical Small-eared Shrew +. + + + + +Synonyms: + +Cryptotis micrurus +(Tomes 1861) + +; + +Cryptotis tropicalis +( +Gray 1843 +) + +. + + + + +Distribution: +Eastern highlands of +Chiapas +( +Mexico +) east and south into highlands of +Belize +and +Guatemala +(Carraway, ms; +Choate, 1970 +). + + + + +Discussion: + +C. parva + +group. Until recently a subspecies of + +parva + +, but species rank suggested by Carraway (ms) and Woodman (pers. comm., 2003). Relations to + +C. orophila + +remain to be studied. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A5/95/37A59556CEF2273FAC9586B20DFF37EB.xml b/data/37/A5/95/37A59556CEF2273FAC9586B20DFF37EB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..da33347a686 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A5/95/37A59556CEF2273FAC9586B20DFF37EB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ + + + +A revision of Northern Vietnamese species of the ant genus Pheidole (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae). + + + +Author + +Eguchi, K. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2008 + +1902 + + +1 +118 + + + + +http://hol.osu.edu/reference-full.html?id=22171 + +journal article +22171 + + + + +Pheidole parva Mayr + + + +Figs. 18a-g + + + +Pheidole parva Mayr +, 1865: 98. Eguchi, Yamane & Zhou 2007: 261-265 (redescription of major & minor). Syntypes: 1 major & 2 minors, "Ceylon" [= Sri Lanka], +NHMW +, examined. + + +Pheidole parva var. decanica Forel +, 1902: 175. Eguchi, Yamane & Zhou 2007: 261-265 (lectotype designation, junior synonym of +parva +). Lectotype: major, "Cochin (Inde) (Rothney)" [India], +MHNG +, examined; paralectotypes: 2 majors, "Cochin (Inde) (Rothney)" [India], +MHNG +, examined; 3 minors, "Kanara XXXI 8 (Aitken)" [India], +MHNG +, examined; 3 queens, "Belgaum. (Wroughton) XXXII 1c" [India], +MHNG +, examined; 3 males, "Belgaum (Wroughton) XXXII 1b", +MHNG +, examined; specimens from Poona [India] and Ceylon [Sri Lanka] (according to the original description), not examined. + + +Pheidole bugi Wheeler +, 1919: 66. Eguchi 2001b: 37-39 (lectotype designation & redescription of major & minor), Eguchi, Yamane & Zhou 2007: 261-265 (junior synonym of +parva +). Lectotype: major, "Sarawak, Borneo, R. Thaxter", +MCZC +cotype-8947, examined. + + +Pheidole rinae var. mala Forel +, 1911a: 205. Eguchi 2001b: 39 (lectotype designation), Eguchi, Yamane & Zhou 2007: 261-265 (junior synonym of +parva +). Lectotype: major, "Semarang Java (Jacobson)", +MHNG +, examined; paralectotypes: 2 majors & 3 minors, "Semarang Java (Jacobson)", +MHNG +, examined. + + +Pheidole rinae r. tipuna Forel +, 1912a: 68. Eguchi, Yamane & Zhou 2007: 261-265 (lectotype designation, junior synonym of +parva +). Lectotype: major, "Takao Formose (Sauter) 25" [= Kaoshung, Taiwan], +MHNG +, examined; paralectotypes: 3 minors, "Takao 25 Formose (Sauter)", +MHNG +, examined. + + +Pheidole sauteri Wheeler +, 1909: 334. Eguchi, Yamane & Zhou 2007: 261-265 (junior synonym ofparva). Syntypes: 3 majors & 19 minors, "Takao, Formosa, H. Sauter" [= Kaoshung, Taiwan], +MCZC +cotype 20671, examined. + + + + +Other material examined: Ogasawara Is.: Chichi-jima I.: Chichi-jima I. [K. Hamaguchi], pass to Miyanohama, [K. Nakashima]. Ryukyus: Amami-Oshima I. [Sk. Yamane]; Okinawa-jima I.: Nishihara-cho, [Eg01-JPN-001, -002], Naha-shi [Y. Nishizono], Sueyoshi Park, Syuri, Naha-shi [K. Kishima's colony: A-7]. S. China: Hong Kong: Mai Po Marshes, New Territory [J. Fellowes], Tai Lung Farm, Sheung Shui, New Territory[Sk. Yamane]; Macau: Hac-Sa, Coloane I. [K. Eguchi]. N. Vietnam: Thai Nguyen: My Yen Commune Forest, +21°35'N +, +105°36'E +, Na Hau Village [Eg01-VN-134, -135, -136, -137, -145, -151, -152]; Ninh Binh: Ninh Binh [K. Ogata: 15 min.-TUS#2], Cuc Phuong N.P., +20°14'N +, +105°36'E +, 370 m alt. [Eg01-VN-179, - 180]. S. Vietnam: Ho Chi Minh City [R.H. Crozier, +MCZC +]. Thailand: Bangkok: Campus of Kasetsart Univ. [Eg01-TH-585, -586, -587], Bang Khean (Residential area) [TH03-SKY-106]. Philippines: Luzon: Asin Hot +Spring +, Benguet, W. Beguio [S. Schodl]; Surigao del N. Dinagat I.: 6.8 road km N. Dinagat vill., Busay [S. Schodl]; Catanduanes: Virac La Tri Lodge and Rest., Virac [H. Zettel]. W. Malaysia: Penang: Campus of Univ. Sains Malaysia [C.Y. Lee]. E. Malaysia: Sabah: Tawau Hills Park [K. Eguchi]. Brunei: Tasek Merimbun [Eg99-BOR-004]. Indonesia: W. Sumatra: Muko Muko, Maninjau [SNS coll.]; Mentawai Is.: Rokot, Plau Sipora [SNS coll.]. Lombok I.: Selong [Eg98-LMB-1020, -1021]; C. Java: Gajah Mada Univ., Yogyakarta [JV02/03-SKY-20]. Nepal: 16 km NE. Tumlingtar, +27°25'N +, +87°19'E +, 670 m alt. [C. Carpenter]. India: Utter Pradesh: Rajaji N.P., 600-700 m alt., 10 km SE. Dehra Dun [A. Schulz & K. Vock]. Sri Lanka: Kandy: Campus of Univ., Peradeniya [LK01-SKY-16, -26]. Germany: Cottbus [A. Buschiuger]. Austria: Wien: Tiergarten (Zoo) [G. Hillebrand]. Eguchi's informal species code " +Pheidole +sp. eg-56" has been applied to these specimens. + + + +Worker measurements & indices: Major (data from Eguchi, Yamane & Zhou 2007). - HL 0.96-1.07 mm; HW 0.85-0.92 mm; CI 85-92; SL 0.41-0.45 mm; SI 45-51; FL 0.57-0.62 mm; FI 64-68. +Minor (data from Eguchi, Yamane & Zhou 2007). - HL 0.43-0.54 mm; HW 0.39-0.50 mm; CI 88-94; SL 0.38-0.46 mm; SI 84-102; FL 0.39-0.48 mm; FI 93-109. +Worker description +Major. - Head in lateral view not or very weakly impressed on vertex; frons to anterior part of vertex longitudinally rugose; posterior part of vertex rusogo-reticulate; dorsal and dorsolateral faces of vertexal lobe reticulate or rusogo-reticulate; frontal carina absent or inconspicuous (present just as weak rugulae); antennal scrobe absent; median longitudinal carina on clypeus absent, or rarely present but weak; hypostoma with median and submedian processes in addition to conspicuous lateral processes; median process often lower than submedian process, or sometimes almost disappearing; submedian processes usually conspicuous; outer surface of mandible (excluding area around the base) smooth or dimly rugose partly, sparsely with (very) short appressed hairs; antenna with a 3-segmented club; maximal diameter of eye longer than antennal segment X. Promesonotal dome in dorsal view rugoso-reticulate or irregularly rugose with interspaces smooth or dimly to distinctly punctured, or punctured weakly; the dome in lateral view at most with an inconspicuous mound on its posterior slope; humerus weakly produced laterad; the dome at the humeri almost as broad as or broader than at the bottom. Petiole much longer than postpetiole (excluding helcium); petiolar node in lateral view relatively high; postpetiole not massive; first gastral tergite weakly rugoso-punctate in its anterior 1/3 or at least around its articulation with postpetiole. +Minor. - Dorsum of head punctured and often overlain by weak rugoso-reticulation; preoccipital carina absent or inconspicuous dorsally; median part of clypeus smooth or weakly punctured; median longitudinal carina absent, or present but weak; antenna with a 3-segmented club; scape exceeding posterior margin of head by less than half length of antennal segment II, or not reaching the posterior margin; maximal diameter of eye longer than antennal segment X. Mesosoma punctured; punctuation on dorsum of promesonotal dome often overlain sparsely by weak rugulae; promesonotal dome in lateral view relatively weakly convex, at most with an inconspicuous mound on its posterior slope; humerus in dorso-oblique view very weakly produced; propodeal spine elongate-triangular. Petiole much longer than postpetiole (excluding helcium); postpetiole not massive. +Recognition: This species is characterized among Indo-Chinese species by the combination of the following features: in the major frontal carina almost absent; in the major hypostoma in the middle with 3 processes (median process is often low, rarely much reduced); in the minor scape exceeding posterior margin of head by less than half length of antennal segment II, or not reaching the posterior margin; in the minor maximal diameter of eye longer than antennal segment X; in the minor dorsal and lateral faces of head and mesosoma punctured; in the major and minor posterior slope of promesonotal dome lacking a conspicuous prominence/ mound. + + + + +FIGURE +18a-d, +Pheidole parva +, major [K. Ogata: 15 min.-TUS#2] - a, head in full-face view; b, head in lateral view; c, mesosoma and waist in dorsal view; d, mesosoma and waist in lateral view. + + + + +FIGURE +18e-g, +Pheidole parva +, minor [K. Ogata: 15 min.-TUS#2] - e, head in full-face view; f, mesosoma and waist in dorsal view; g, mesosoma and waist in lateral view. + + + + + +P. parva +is most similar to +P. rabo Forel +. In the minor of the latter, however, scape usually exceeds posterior margin of head by almost the length of antennal segment II, and maximal diameter of eye is almost as long as or a little shorter than antennal segment X. + + + +Distribution & bionomics: Widely distributed in the Oriental region, Austro-Malayan subregion and W. + +Pacific +. This species prefers open lands, tillage and gardens to woody habitats, and nests under the ground. In rural areas of N. Vietnamese this species and +P. yeensis +are the most dominant +Pheidole +species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A6/1B/37A61B067F715627C6FDE9B002ECD376.xml b/data/37/A6/1B/37A61B067F715627C6FDE9B002ECD376.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fb76a00a89e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A6/1B/37A61B067F715627C6FDE9B002ECD376.xml @@ -0,0 +1,465 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Brassicaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/brassicaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Bunias orientalis +L. + + + + + + +Glattes +Zackenschoetchen + + + + + +Art ISFS: 68300 Checklist: 1007660 +Brassicaceae +Bunias +Bunias orientalis L. + + +Zusammenfassung + + + + +Artbeschreibung + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: +30-120 cm +hoch, verzweigt, kahl oder mit einzelnen Haaren. Untere +Blaetter +bis +40 cm +lang, +tief fiederteilig +, mit wenigen schmalen Abschnitten und +grossem, 3eckigem Endabschnitt +. Obere +Blaetter +viel kleiner und weniger geteilt. + +Kronblaetter +gelb, gerundet + +, +5-6 mm +lang. + +Fruechte +eifoermig + +, +6-10 mm +lang, ohne +Fluegel +, aber + +mit +unregelmaessigen +Hoeckern + +und ca. +1 mm +langem Griffel, auf +12-15 mm +langem, aufrecht abstehendem Stiel. + + + + +Bluetezeit + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: 5-8 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: +Aecker +, +Schuttplaetze +, +Boeschungen +/ kollin-montan / J, M, VS, GR, zerstreut im +uebrigen +Alpengebiet + + + + +Verbreitung global + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: +Osteuropaeisch-westasiatisch + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte + +(nach +Landolt & al. 2010 +) + +234-33 + 4.g-k.2n=14 + + + + + +Oekologie + + +Lebensform Geophyt, Monokarper Hemikryptophyt + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
4.6 - Grasbrachen
+4.6.1 - Queckenbrache ( +Convolvulo-Agropyrion +) +
+ +7.1.8 - +Laegerflur +der Tieflagen ( +Arction +) + +
+ + + +fett + +Dominante Art, welche das Aussehen des Lebensraumes +mitpraegt + +Charakterart +Weniger strikt an den Lebensraum gebundene Art + + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F +maessig +trocken +Lichtzahl LhalbschattigSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rschwach sauer bis neutral (pH 4.5-7.5)Temperaturzahl Tunter-montan und ober-kollin
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +naehrstoffreich + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subkontinental (niedrige relative Luftfeuchtigkeit, grosse Temperaturschwankungen, eher kalte Winter)
+ + + + +Nomenklatur + + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Bunias orientalis +L. + + + + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: + +Glattes +Zackenschoetchen + +Nom +francais +: + +Bunias d'Orient +Nome + +italiano: + +Cascellore +orientale + + + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Bunias orientalis L. + + +Checklist 2017 + +68300
= +Bunias orientalis L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2001 + +629
= +Bunias orientalis L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2012 + +859
= +Bunias orientalis L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2018 + +859
= +Bunias orientalis L. + + +Index synonymique 1996 + +68300
= +Bunias orientalis L. + + +Landolt 1977 + +1327
= +Bunias orientalis L. + + +Landolt 1991 + +1130
= +Bunias orientalis L. + + +SISF/ISFS 2 + +68300
= +Bunias orientalis L. + + +Welten & Sutter 1982 + +473
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Status Indigenat +: Neophyt: nach der Entdeckung von Amerika in der Region aufgetreten (nach 1500) + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein +Art der "Liste der invasiven gebietsfremden Arten" +Neophyten-Infoblatt + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A6/DC/37A6DCE833BA5312A729740A631BDFFD.xml b/data/37/A6/DC/37A6DCE833BA5312A729740A631BDFFD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..20d421208cd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A6/DC/37A6DCE833BA5312A729740A631BDFFD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ + + + +Pheidole in the New World. A dominant, hyperdiverse ant genus. + + + +Author + +Wilson, E. O. + +text + +2003 +Harvard University Press + +Cambridge, MA + + + +http://atbi.biosci.ohio-state.edu/HymOnline/reference-full.html?id=20017 + +book +20017 + + + + +Pheidole lemnisca +new species + +Types Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard. + + + +etymology L +lemnisca +, ribbon or band, referring to the transverse color stripes on the gaster. Diagnosis Similar to species listed in the heading above, distinguished as follows. + + + +Major: unique color pattern (see Color below); needle-like propodeal spine; prominent humeral lobe; and small but distinct mesonotal convexity. + + +measurements (mm) Holotype major: HW 0.70, HL 0.74, SL 0.36, EL 0.10, PW 0.40. Paratype minor: HW 0.42, HL 0.42, SL 0.40, EL 0.10, PW 0.26. +color Major: all yellow except for a conspicuous light brown transverse stripe along the rear border of each gastral tergite and a contrasting light brown circular spot on the vertex. +Minor: concolorous yellow. + + +Range Known only from the type series. + + +Biology Males were collected with the type colony, 1-4 June. + + +Figure Upper: holotype, major. Lower: paratype, minor. COLOMBIA: on a ridge, Finca Los Guaduales, 10 km southwest San Jose del Palmar, Rio Torito, Choco (C. Kugler). Scale bars = 1 mm. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A7/0A/37A70AC743405FCDF9ECACC67F8F5964.xml b/data/37/A7/0A/37A70AC743405FCDF9ECACC67F8F5964.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cceba3091d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A7/0A/37A70AC743405FCDF9ECACC67F8F5964.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Further contributions to the Hydradephaga (Coleoptera, Haliplidae, Gyrinidae and Dytiscidae) fauna of Prince Edward Island, Canada: new records, distributions and faunal composition + + + +Author + +Alarie, Yves + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +600 + + +103 +129 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.600.8856 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.600.8856 +1313-2970-600-103 +97B30DD8F5B34A569C7478C655230D31 +97B30DD8F5B34A569C7478C655230D31 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Coleoptera Dytiscidae + + + +Neoporus clypealis (Sharp) + + + +Note. + +Neoporus clypealis +is reported from 22 specimens collected in each of the three Prince Edward Island counties (Table 2). + + + + +Habitat +. + + +This species occurs among emergent vegetation such as sedges, along the margins of slow, marshy streams, beaver ponds, and small lakes. Beetles are generally found where there is some water movement and are usually on mineral substrates ( +Larson et al. 2000 +). With few exceptions, most specimens collected in Prince Edward Island were from creeks and small rivers (Table 1). + + + +Distribution in the Maritime Ecozone. + +Neoporus clypealis +is known also from the neighboring Provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia ( +Larson et al. 2000 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A7/40/37A7400DF64E94BE24CFC1150FE85216.xml b/data/37/A7/40/37A7400DF64E94BE24CFC1150FE85216.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b9fe5117f51 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A7/40/37A7400DF64E94BE24CFC1150FE85216.xml @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Lacerta igvana +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + +L. cauda tereti longa, sutura dorsali dentata, crista gulae denticulata. + +Amoen. acad. +1. +p. +123. 287. Lacerta cauda tereti, pedibus pentadactylis, crista dorsi longitudinali, gulae pendula antice dentata. + + +Mus. Ad. Fr. +1. +p. +43. Idem. + + +Gron. mus. +2. +p. +82. +n. +60. Igvana. + + +Marcgr. bras. +236. +f. +236. + + + +Jonst +. quadr. t. + +77. +f. +5. + + +Jacob. mus. t. +4. + + +Olear. mus. t. +6. +f. +1. Yvana. + + +Bont. jav. +56. +t. +56. Lacerta Leguan. + + +Marcgr. bras. +236. Senembi s. Igvana. + + +Nieremb. nat. +271. +t. +271. + + +Ovied. amer. l. +13. +c. +3. + + +Rhed. exper. +100. +t. +101. Igvane. + + +Worm. mus. +313. + + +Sloan. jam. +2. +p. +333. + + +Raj. quadr. +265. Lacertus Senembi & Igvana. + + +Seb. mus. +1. +t. +95. +f. +1. 2. + + +96. +f. +4. + + +97. +f. +3. + + +98. +f. +1. + + +Clus. exot. +116. Yvana. + + +Catesb. car. +2. +p. +64. +t. +64? + + + + +Habitat in +Indiis. + + + + +Capitur linea laqueari +; +Caro omnium sapidissima, Siphiliticis +noxia. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A7/90/37A79004C14095692891051CB19F2F51.xml b/data/37/A7/90/37A79004C14095692891051CB19F2F51.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c3cbca3226a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A7/90/37A79004C14095692891051CB19F2F51.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Polychaetes of Greece: an updated and annotated checklist + + + +Author + +Faulwetter, Sarah + + + +Author + +Simboura, Nomiki + + + +Author + +Katsiaras, Nikolaos + + + +Author + +Chatzigeorgiou, Giorgos + + + +Author + +Arvanitidis, Christos + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2017 + +5 + + +20997 +20997 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20997 +1314-2828--20997 + + + + +Nephtys incisa Malmgren, 1865 + + + +Notes + +See notes under +Nephtys hystricis +McIntosh, 1900. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A8/16/37A816DEED796A37A9C204876BB7398E.xml b/data/37/A8/16/37A816DEED796A37A9C204876BB7398E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d4b3f919105 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A8/16/37A816DEED796A37A9C204876BB7398E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ + + + +A key to the genera and species of the transversely-dividing Flabellidae (Anthozoa, Scleractinia, Flabellidae), with a guide to the literature, and the description of two new species + + + +Author + +Cairns, Stephen D. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +562 + + +1 +48 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.562.7310 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.562.7310 +1313-2970-562-1 +D11C6C1E6EE74C8DA560331E75947EC8 + + + + +Taxon +classification Animalia Scleractinia Flabellidae + + + + +Falcatoflabellum raoulensis Cairns, 1995 +Fig. 12D + + + + +Falcatoflabellum raoulensis +Cairns, 1995: 118, pl. 39b-g.- +Cairns and Kitahara 2012 +: pl. 20, figs +K-M +. + + + +Distribution. +As for genus. + + +Remarks. +Known only from the type series of 21 specimens from the type-locality. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A8/8D/37A88D03D05DADA671BDF17D6D8CFFF8.xml b/data/37/A8/8D/37A88D03D05DADA671BDF17D6D8CFFF8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..34b93060f0f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A8/8D/37A88D03D05DADA671BDF17D6D8CFFF8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ + + + +Streamlining the use of BOLD specimen data to record species distributions: a case study with ten Nearctic species of Microgastrinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) + + + +Author + +Fernandez-Triana, Jose L + + + +Author + +Penev, Lyubomir + + + +Author + +Ratnasingham, Sujeevan + + + +Author + +Smith, M. Alex + + + +Author + +Sones, Jayme + + + +Author + +Telfer, Angela + + + +Author + +deWaard, Jeremy R. + + + +Author + +Hebert, Paul D. N. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +4153 +4153 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e4153 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e4153 +1314-2828-2-4153 + + + + +Dolichogenidea longicauda (Wesmael, 1837) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +CNCHYM 01091 +; recordedBy: +Doganlar +; lifeStage: +Adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: HYCNE902-11; Location: country: +Canada +; stateProvince: British Columbia; locality: +Burnaby +; Identification: identifiedBy: Jose Fernandez-Triana; Event: verbatimEventDate: +09-Jul-1978 +; Record Level: institutionID: Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +CNCHYM 01093 +; lifeStage: +Adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: HYCNE904-11; Location: country: +Canada +; stateProvince: British Columbia; locality: +New Westminster +; Identification: identifiedBy: Jose Fernandez-Triana; Event: verbatimEventDate: +05-May-1978 +; Record Level: institutionID: Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +CNCHYM 01089 +; recordedBy: +Doganlar +; lifeStage: +Adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: HYCNE900-11; Location: country: +Canada +; stateProvince: British Columbia; locality: +Burnaby +; Identification: identifiedBy: Jose Fernandez-Triana; Event: verbatimEventDate: +01-Jul-1977 +; Record Level: institutionID: Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +CNCHYM 00216 +; recordedBy: +Doganlar +; lifeStage: +Adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: HYCNE026-11; Location: country: +Canada +; stateProvince: British Columbia; locality: +Burnaby +; Identification: identifiedBy: Jose Fernandez-Triana; Event: verbatimEventDate: +01-Jul-1977 +; Record Level: institutionID: Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes + + + + +Notes + +This species is widely distributed in the Palaearctic ( +Yu et al. 2012 +). It was recorded from one province in Canada (BC) by +Fernandez-Triana (2010) +, + +Fernandez-Triana +and Huber (2010) + +, but no locality records were provided at the time. Here we present new information about the distribution of this species in Canada (BC), as well as the first record of this species from the United States (WA) based on examined specimens from the BIO and CNC collections. Data for those specimens was extracted from BOLD. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A9/5C/37A95C879019E883E863DF376486D2F4.xml b/data/37/A9/5C/37A95C879019E883E863DF376486D2F4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1af66e75d9c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A9/5C/37A95C879019E883E863DF376486D2F4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828-4-8013 + + + + +Quadrastichus perissiae (Janata, 1912) + + + + +Tetrastichus perissiae +Janata, 1912 + + + +Distribution +England + + +Notes +Added by Graham (1991a) + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A9/67/37A9676A971A8F6B646FD55E30A37681.xml b/data/37/A9/67/37A9676A971A8F6B646FD55E30A37681.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..af6a6942519 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A9/67/37A9676A971A8F6B646FD55E30A37681.xml @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ + + + +Catalogue of hymenopterous insects collected by Mr. A. R. Wallace in the Islands of Ceram, Celebes, Ternate, and Gilolo. + + + +Author + +Smith, F. + +text + + +Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology + + +1861 + +6 + + +36 +48 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/2596/2596.pdf + +journal article +2596 +478E0DB4-21A2-4A50-B59D-774B53696A70 + + + + +5. +Formica leucophaea +. + + + +F. nigra, dense cinerea, pilosa; thorace postice attenuato; squama oblongo-ovata. +Worker. Length 3 lines. Black and densely covered with a fine silky cinereous pile; antennae nearly as long as the body, slender, and filiform, the flagellum scarcely thickened towards the apex; eyes rather large and prominent, and situated high on the sides of the head; head oblong, narrowed behind the eyes. Thorax oblong, narrowed and of equal width behind the prothorax; legs very obscurely reddish, with the apical joints of the tarsi rufo-testaceous. Abdomen ovate, the apical margins of the segments testaceous; the scale of the peduncle narrow, small, and pointed above. + + +Hab. Celebes (Tondano). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A9/9D/37A99D1B5F8A8BAC4E748E7DD082DBC2.xml b/data/37/A9/9D/37A99D1B5F8A8BAC4E748E7DD082DBC2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4fba0e31906 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A9/9D/37A99D1B5F8A8BAC4E748E7DD082DBC2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Subtribe + +Camarotina +Schoenherr +, 1833 + + + + + +Camarotides +Schoenherr +, 1833: 4 [stem: Camarot-]. Type genus: +Camarotus +Germar, 1817. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/A9/A3/37A9A314E9B8B1E3FD7DFC37F9BB5A0A.xml b/data/37/A9/A3/37A9A314E9B8B1E3FD7DFC37F9BB5A0A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ee4936611d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/A9/A3/37A9A314E9B8B1E3FD7DFC37F9BB5A0A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ + + + +Checklist of bees (Apoidea) from a private conservation property in west-central Montana + + + +Author + +Kuhlman, Marirose + + + +Author + +Burrows, Skyler + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2017 + +5 + + +11506 +11506 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e11506 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e11506 +1314-2828--11506 + + + + +Triepeolus heterurus (Cockerell & Sandhouse 1924) + + + +Notes +New species record for Montana + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AA/25/37AA25C95834B20B5530EB7B8BBFFFC0.xml b/data/37/AA/25/37AA25C95834B20B5530EB7B8BBFFFC0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7dfbebf7b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AA/25/37AA25C95834B20B5530EB7B8BBFFFC0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +An annotated type catalogue of seven genera of operculate land snails (Caenogastropoda, Cyclophoridae) in the Natural History Museum, London + + + +Author + +Sutcharit, Chirasak + + + +Author + +Ablett, Jonathan D. + + + +Author + +Panha, Somsak + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +842 + + +1 +65 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.842.29243 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.842.29243 +1313-2970-842-1 +3A4BB2800F484831AF4BC84D6FE5CDAE + + + + +88. +trailli Pfeiffer, 1862 +Fig. 12E, F + + + + +Cyclotus trailli +Pfeiffer, 1862: 116, fig, 4. +Reeve 1863 +: volume 14, +Cyclotus +, pl. 9, species 56. + + + +Current generic position. + +Cyclotus +Swainson, 1840 + + + +Type locality. +Russel-Canda, Madras [in the area of Chennai District, Tamil Nadu State, India]. + + +Type material. +Syntype NHMUK 20030588 (3 shells; Fig. 12E, F). + + +Remarks. + +The original description by Pfeiffer includes the illustration of a shell and gives one set of shell measurements. The type lot in the NHM collections was collected by "Dr. Trail" and is from the Cuming collection as stated in the original description. It has an original label in +Pfeiffer's +handwriting giving the species name and collection locality. The largest specimen, marked with an +"x" +which most closely matches the measurements and the illustration shown in the original description is figured herein (Fig. 12E). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AA/4F/37AA4FE577D557D8D23EAE66E4BCB1B4.xml b/data/37/AA/4F/37AA4FE577D557D8D23EAE66E4BCB1B4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cb3ad6920f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AA/4F/37AA4FE577D557D8D23EAE66E4BCB1B4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828--8013 + + + + +Chrysocharis idyia (Walker, 1839) + + + + +Entedon idyia +Walker, 1839 + + +pontinus +(Walker, 1839, +Entedon +) + + +iriarte +(Walker, 1848, +Gastrancistrus +) + + +heterotomus +(Thomson, 1878, +Derostenus +) + + + +Distribution +England + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AA/AA/37AAAA440530DA093B783380EFBD1130.xml b/data/37/AA/AA/37AAAA440530DA093B783380EFBD1130.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..11fe51b7501 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AA/AA/37AAAA440530DA093B783380EFBD1130.xml @@ -0,0 +1,247 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Amaryllidaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/amaryllidaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Allium insubricum +Boiss. & Reut. + + + + + +Art ISFS: 22900 Checklist: 1002620 +Amaryllidaceae +Allium +Allium insubricum Boiss. & Reut. + + +Zusammenfassung +KEINE ANGABE + + + +Oekologie + + + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + +KEINE ANGABE + + +
+
+ + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl L--Salzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl T--
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +--
+ + + + +Nomenklatur + + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Allium insubricum +Boiss. & Reut. + + + + + +Volksname + + + +Deutscher Name: -- Nom +francais +: -- Nome italiano: -- + + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Allium insubricum Boiss. & Reut. + + +Checklist 2017 + +22900
= +Allium insubricum Boiss. & Reut. + + +Index synonymique 1996 + +22900
= +Allium insubricum Boiss. & Reut. + + +Landolt 1977 + +670
= +Allium insubricum Boiss. & Reut. + + +SISF/ISFS 2 + +22900
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Status Indigenat +: - + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AB/54/37AB545FCCAB12D55AB43416F931DA0F.xml b/data/37/AB/54/37AB545FCCAB12D55AB43416F931DA0F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74d6571f05d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AB/54/37AB545FCCAB12D55AB43416F931DA0F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Sawflies, ' Symphyta' + + + +Author + +Liston, Andrew D. + + + +Author + +Knight, Guy T. + + + +Author + +Sheppard, David A. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1168 +1168 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 +1314-2828--1168 +3C3EC7B09BA145848E3E89CBBD28B432 +3C3EC7B09BA145848E3E89CBBD28B432 + + + + +Trichiosoma tibiale Stephens, 1835 + + + + +Cimbex crataegi +(Zaddach, 1863, +Cimbex +) + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AB/7C/37AB7CA5DC9A28AA02298893AAFBBDE7.xml b/data/37/AB/7C/37AB7CA5DC9A28AA02298893AAFBBDE7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a39da07d4fd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AB/7C/37AB7CA5DC9A28AA02298893AAFBBDE7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +The Mecyclothorax beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Moriomorphini) of Tahiti, Society Islands + + + +Author + +Liebherr, James K. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +322 + + +1 +170 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.322.5492 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.322.5492 +1313-2970-322-1 + + + + +48. +Mecyclothorax curtisi +sp. n. + + + +Diagnosis. + +Unique among the + +Mecyclothorax +striatopunctatus + +group in the orbicular pronotum with broad pale margins, and the obovate elytra with pale, broadly explanate lateral marginal depressions (Fig. 28C). Setal formula 2221; standardized body length 5.4 mm. Head with deep frontal grooves, narrow behind and depressed mesad a low carina inside anterior supraorbital seta, sinuous toward midline at midlength, and broad, shallow near frontoclypeal suture; eyes moderately convex but small in diameter, ocular ratio 1.50, ocular lobe distinctly expanded from gena, ocular lobe ratio 0.80; antennae moderately elongate, filiform, eighth anennomere length 2.0 +x +maximal breadth. Pronotum transverse, MPW/PL = 1.31, orbicular, with broadly rounded hind angles and convex basal margin; basal pronotal setae expanding lateral margin, causing minute jag in margin, the seta and jag set 0.12 +x +pronotal length anterad the pronotal basal margin at the midline; median base with four shallow, isolated punctures each side and 7-8 longitudinal wrinkles at juncture with disc; anterior transverse impression broad, shallow, complete medially, crossed by 10-11 fine wrinkles in median quarter of each side; front angles broadly rounded, little protruded anteriorly, the lateral marginal depression gradually widened posterad to base, laterobasal depression defined by a U-shaped depression that is continuous with the lateral depression surrounding a low, irregular tubercle. Elytra narrow basally, MEW/HuW = 2.67, the basal groove distinctly recurved anteriorly to the subangulate humerus; parascutellar seta on papillate dome that is bordered behind by a depression connecting parascutellar striole and interval 1; disc depressed across first four intervals each side directly posterad the inflated parascutellar striole; flat lateral marginal depression gradually widened with margin more upraised posterad humerus, achieving maximal breadth near posterior seta of anterior lateral elytral setal series; discal elytral striae 1-6 deep, set with distinct elongate punctures that expand the strial breadth in a crenulate pattern; stria 7 shallow, finely inscribed, punctures isolated, especially apically; eighth elytral interval upraised above striae 7 from anterad subapical sinuation to apex, tightly convex, looking pinched laterally dorsad subapical sinuation; lateral elytral setae 7 + 1 + 5 (left) and 7 + 6 (right) of unique holotype. +Metathoracic wings +stenopterous straps 4 +x +long as wide, margins parallel in apical half, apex narrowly rounded; alae with distinct Sc+R and M veins present, and indistinct wrinkles in cubital region of wing rudiment. Microsculpture of head a distinct transverse mesh visible across frontal grooves, frons, and vertex; pronotal disc covered with well-developed transverse mesh, the sculpticell pattern influenced by wrinkles radiating from the disc center, sculpticell breadth 3 +-4x +length; discal elytral intervals with regular transverse mesh, sculpticell breadth 2 +-3x +length, with some isodiametric sculpticells intermixed. Coloration of head a uniform rufobrunneous; antennomere 1 flavous, each antennomere 2-11 rufobrunneous basally, rufoflavous apically; pronotal disc rufobrunneous to match head color, lateral marginal depression rufoflavous, palest at front angle; elytral disc flavobrunneous, paler than head and pronotal disc; elytral lateral marginal depression concolorous with disc at humerus, paler apically all the way to subapical sinuation; femora brunneous with flavous apex, tibiae flavous with brunneous cast. Male abdomen with extra transverse, arcuate fold near midlength of visible abdominal ventrite 6, resulting in a partially formed ventrite 7; two smaller setae at apical margin of pseudosegment 6, in line with accessory setae of ventrites 3-5; apical margin of pseudosegment 7 with the usual two apical setae at lateral quarter of breadth each side. + + +Male genitalia. Aedeagal median lobe only moderately curved, ventral surface of shaft straight apicad parameral articulations (Fig. 27G); median lobe apex short, rounded, slightly more expanded on dorsal margin; ostial canal starting on ride side of lobe apex, terminated closer to dorsal margin; flagellar plate elongate, length ~0.50 +x +distance from parameral articulations to apical face; right paramere slightly broadened, parallel sided from base to tightly rounded apex. + + +Holotype male (MNHN) labeled: French Polynesia: Tahiti Iti / Mts. Teatara summit / 1195 m el. 17-IX-2006 lot 10 / +17°47.907'S +, +149°14.183'W +/ pyr. fog +Astelia +on mossy / log C.P. Ewing // HOLOTYPE / Mecyclothorax / curtisi / J.K. Liebherr 2013 (black-bordered red label). + + + +Etymology. +The patronymic species epithet curtisi honors the collector, Dr. Curtis P. Ewing, who collected extensively at the summit of Mont Teatara, one of several inaccessible French Polynesian peaks he has worked hard to explore. + + +Distribution and habitat. + +The holotype and only known specimen was collected at 1195 m elevation at the summit of Mont Teatara, Tahiti Iti. The specimen came from a pyrethrin fog sample of a horizontal mossy log with an epiphytic +Astelia +plant growing on it. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AB/A3/37ABA35ABE109D89FB870DF2186C6131.xml b/data/37/AB/A3/37ABA35ABE109D89FB870DF2186C6131.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e51bd7257af --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AB/A3/37ABA35ABE109D89FB870DF2186C6131.xml @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ + + + +Targeting a portion of central European spider diversity for permanent preservation + + + +Author + +Candek, Klemen + + + +Author + +Gregoric, Matjaz + + + +Author + +Kostanjsek, Rok + + + +Author + +Frick, Holger + + + +Author + +Kropf, Christian + + + +Author + +Kuntner, Matjaz + + + +Author + +Miller, Jeremy A. + + + +Author + +Hoeksema, Bert W. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2013 + +1 + + +980 +980 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e980 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e980 +1314-2828-1 + + + + +scabripes +Crustulina +Theridiidae +Animalia + + + + +Crustulina scabripes Simon, 1881 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +Occurrence: recordedBy: + +Kuntner, +Gregoric +, +Candek +, +Kralj-Fiser +, Cheng + +; sex: +2 males +; Location: locationID: SI41; country: +Slovenia +; locality: +Socerb, Osp +; minimumElevationInMeters: 116; maximumElevationInMeters: 116; decimalLatitude: +45.5819 +; decimalLongitude: +13.8558 +; Event: eventDate: +2012-06-07 +; habitat: trail from Socerb to Osp + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AB/C7/37ABC7AC33253CE97B299687342398E2.xml b/data/37/AB/C7/37ABC7AC33253CE97B299687342398E2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b9467561e57 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AB/C7/37ABC7AC33253CE97B299687342398E2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Banchus Fabricius, 1798 + + + +Notes + +Distribution data from +Fitton (1985a) +and the NMS. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AB/D6/37ABD66B53D6413112437ECD1CFCC7D8.xml b/data/37/AB/D6/37ABD66B53D6413112437ECD1CFCC7D8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..34001445f6d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AB/D6/37ABD66B53D6413112437ECD1CFCC7D8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ + + + +New species of Brachystomellidae and characterization of Micronella porcus (Denis, 1933) from Brazil + + + +Author + +Queiroz, Gabriel C. + + + +Author + +Mendonca, Maria Cleide de + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +316 + + +81 +98 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.316.4869 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.316.4869 +1313-2970-316-81 + + + + +Micronella itacaman +sp. n. +Figs 1-14 + + + +Type material. + +Holotype: female, on slide. Label: +N° +2332 CM/MNRJ, Itatiaia, RJ, Brasil, Queiroz, G.C. leg, 27.iii.2012, +22°22'59"S +, +44°40'1"W +. Paratype: 1 female on slide, Label: +N° +2138 CM/MNRJ (D), Itatiaia, RJ, Brasil; Queiroz, G.C. leg, 14.vii.2011, +22°22'59"S +, +44°40'1"W +. Deposited at MNRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. + + + +Type locality. + +Brasil, Rio de Janeiro: Itatiaia municipality, Parque Nacional de Itatiaia (ICMBio), +22°22'59"S +, +44°40'1"W +, leaf litter and soil of "campos de altitude", 2,400 m a.s.l. + + +Other material. One female on slide, Label: +N° +2153 CM/MNRJ (A), Alto +Caparao +, MG, Brasil, Queiroz, G.C. leg, 27.vii.2011, +20°26'7"S +, +41°47'54"W +. Deposited at MNRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. One specimen deposited at MNHN, Paris, Fran +ce +: female, on slide, MNHN-EA011504, +Teresopolis +, RJ. Brasil, Queiroz, G.C. leg; 30.iii.2011, +22°27'38"S +, +43°1'45"W +. + + + +Description. +Habitus typical of the genus. Body length of holotype: 0.88 mm; body length range of paratypes: 0.63-0.90 mm. Color in ethanol: white, no pigmentation. + +Ratio head diagonal: antenna = 1:0.63. Ant I with 7 chaetae. Ant II with 12 chaetae. Ant III and IV fused dorsally, ventral separation marked. Sensory organ of Ant III with two small club shaped sensilla, the mid-ventral one with a bilobed apex; two longer and subcylindrical guard sensilla; ventral microsensillum present (Figs 1-2). All dorsal chaetae of Ant +I-III +are serrated, ventral chaetae smooth and longer than those from dorsal +side +(10-13 +μm +dorsal; 13-15 +μm +ventral). Ant IV with simple apical bulb and five sensilla, three weakly differentiated from ordinary chaetae; dorsolateral microsensillum present; subapical organite round; with about 30 ventral chaetae (Fig. 2). + + + +Figures 1-8. +Micronella itacaman +sp. n. 1 Dorsal view of Ant +I-IV +2. Ventral view of Ant +I-IV +3 PAO and its surrounding chaetae 4 Maxilla 5 Labium 6 Head chaetotaxy of specimen from Itatiaia 7 Head chaetotaxy of specimen from +Teresopolis +8 Head chaetotaxy of specimen from Alto +Caparao +. Scale bars: 10μm (1-5); 20 +μm +(6-8). + + + +Without eyes. PAO bearing 7-8 vesicles disposed as a rosette (Fig. 3). Maxilla quadrangular with 6-7 teeth (Fig. 4). Labral formula: 2/2334. Labium typical of +Brachystomella +, with one papillated chaeta (L) and four proximal chaetae (Fig. 5). + + +Head chaetotaxy as in Figs 6-8; asymmetries in the number of axial chaetae. Chaetae a0 present; Oc chaetae 3+3. Dorsal chaetotaxy composed of ordinary serrated chaetae and sensilla subequal in size, becoming longer towards the distal segments of the body (15 +µm +in Th I and 25 +µm +in Abd VI) (Fig. 9). Ratio of body ordinary chaetae: sensilla = 1:1. Th I with 2+2 chaetae; sensillar formula by half tergum: 022/211110. + + + +Figures 9-14. +Micronella itacaman +sp. n. 9. Dorsal body chaetotaxy with details of sensilla and chaetae 10 Tita of leg I 11 Furcal area 12 Dorsal view of Abd VI 13 Anal valves and ventral view of Abd VI 14 Female genital plate. Scale bars: 10μm (10-14); 50μm (9). + + + +Chaetotaxy of legs +I-III +as follows: Scx +I- +1, 2, 2; Scx +II- +0, 2, 2; +Cx- +3, 6, 7; +Tr- +5, 5, 5; +Fe- +12, 10, 10; +Tita- +19, 19, 18. All chaetae of Scx I of legs +I-III +are serrated. Tenent hair on tibiotarsi acuminate; unguis of legs I and II with one extremely minute median inner tooth; tooth not seen on unguis of leg III (Fig. 10). Ventral tube with 3+3 chaetae. Without tenaculum. Furca completely absent, but with a well-defined furcal area with six chaetae arranged in two rows: anterior row with four chaetae and posterior row with two chaetae (Fig. 11). Abd VI with 4+4 serrated chaetae and one unpaired smooth chaetae on dorsal side (Fig. 12). Each anal valve with 12-13 chaetae and 2 hr chaetae; Abd VI with 3+3 smooth chaetae on ventral side (Fig. 13). Female genital plate as in Fig. 14. + + + +Etymology. + +"Itakama" +(pronounced itakaman) means "high stone" or "rocky mountain" in the indigenous language Tupi, spoken by the Brazilian natives, reference to the three highest mountain plateaus of southeast Brazil, where the species was found. + + + +Discussion. + +The new species, +Micronella itacaman +sp. n., is well characterized in the genus, as all the species share euedaphic characters such as absence of eyes and furca, but with PAO. It can be distinguished from its congeners by characters such as serrated chaetae on body and five sensilla on Ant IV. In relation to number of vesicles on PAO and ratio of ordinary chaetae: sensilla, the new species is most similar to +Micronella porcus +, as they have 6-8 vesicles and a ratio of ordinary chaetae: sensilla of approximately 1:1. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AC/D7/37ACD7A4EFD48AFEF0B9250AC34B7F91.xml b/data/37/AC/D7/37ACD7A4EFD48AFEF0B9250AC34B7F91.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5e9835d96a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AC/D7/37ACD7A4EFD48AFEF0B9250AC34B7F91.xml @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part B) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +343 +369 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Bignonia leucoxylon +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 624. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Jamaica, Caribaeis, agris humidioribus, & ad ripas." RCN: 4518. + + + +Replaced synonym of: + +Bignonia trifolia +L. (1759) + +, +nom. illeg +.; + +Bignonia pentaphylla +L. (1763) + +, +nom. illeg. + + + + + +Lectotype +(Sandwith in +Kew Bull. +8: 453. 1953): Herb. Linn. No. 776.4 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + +Tabebuia heterophylla +(DC.) Britton + +( +Bignoniaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AD/47/37AD47B8A376D8C7BDFDB9190C7530BB.xml b/data/37/AD/47/37AD47B8A376D8C7BDFDB9190C7530BB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3a80ed977e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AD/47/37AD47B8A376D8C7BDFDB9190C7530BB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ + + + +Pheidole in the New World. A dominant, hyperdiverse ant genus. + + + +Author + +Wilson, E. O. + +text + +2003 +Harvard University Press + +Cambridge, MA + + + +http://atbi.biosci.ohio-state.edu/HymOnline/reference-full.html?id=20017 + +book +20017 + + + + +Pheidole pholeops +new species + +types Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard. + + + +etymology Gr +pholeops +, like a hole, or cavity, referring to illusion of a small hole in vertex. + + + +Diagnosis Similar to the species listed in the heading above, differing as follows. + + +Major: a small depression in the posterior center of the vertex gives an illusion of a hole; posterior dorsal profile of head very feebly concave; promesonotum raised, with two pronotal and one angular mesonotal convexity in dorsal-oblique view; postpetiole diamondshaped; faint antennal scrobes present; almost all of dorsal surface of head carinulate and foveolate; all of mesosoma foveolate, and anterior third of pronotum carinulate. +Minor: eye large and set forward on head; propodeal spines reduced to denticles; all of dorsal surface of head and mesosoma foveolate. +Measurements (mm) Holotype major: HW 0.70, HL 0.76, SL 0.40, EL 0.12, PW 0.34. Paratype minor: HW 0.34, HL 0.36, SL 0.32, EL 0.08, PW 0.22. +Color Major: body light brownish yellow ("bronze"), appendages clear medium yellow. + + +range Known from the type locality; from the vicinity of Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil; and from Yasuni National Park, Puerto Tipugini, Ecuador. + + +biology Cover and Tobin collected several colonies at the type locality (Cuzco Amazonico, Peru) in terra firme forest and forest transitional between terra firme and seasonally flooded forest, nesting in rotting sticks and logs on the forest floor and (in one case) in the soil. + + +Figure Upper: holotype, major. Lower: paratype, minor. PERU: Cuzco Amazonico, 15 km northeast of Puerto Maldonado, Madre de Dios (Stefan Cover and John E. Tobin). Scale bars = 1 mm. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AD/6E/37AD6E8302155F9EB5DEBBD0498C6F78.xml b/data/37/AD/6E/37AD6E8302155F9EB5DEBBD0498C6F78.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8b3fb6b5154 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AD/6E/37AD6E8302155F9EB5DEBBD0498C6F78.xml @@ -0,0 +1,416 @@ + + + +The fourth species of Leptobrachella (Anura, Megophryidae) found at Shiwandashan National Nature Reserve, Guangxi, China + + + +Author + +Chen, Wei-Cai +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2398-4079 +Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf Ministry of Education, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China +chenweicai2003@126.com + + + +Author + +Li, Peng +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8311-0544 +Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf Ministry of Education, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China + + + +Author + +Peng, Wan-Xiao +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5635-9061 +Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf Ministry of Education, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China + + + +Author + +Liu, You-Jun +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7285-4943 +Guangxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Intelligent Simulation, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China + + + +Author + +Huang, Yong +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3493-9468 +Shiwandashan National Nature Reserve, Fangcheng 538000, China + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2024 + +2024-02-22 + + +1192 + + +257 +279 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1192.98352 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1192.98352 +1313-2970-1192-257 +96474EC442B14BEEA68D4F736A8A4EB9 +8D4DA76882CC5FCDAE6B8906C96F03FD + + + + +Leptobrachella guinanensis Chen, Li, Peng & Liu +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 5 +, 6 + + + +Material examined. + + + + +Holotype + +. + +NNU 00876, adult male, collected at the +Shiwandashan National Nature Reserve +, +Shangsi County +, +Guangxi +, +China +( +21°55'1.2"N +, +107°54'10.8"E +; + +elevation +512 m + +), collected by +Wei-Cai Chen +on +18 June 2022 + +. + + + +Paratypes + +. + +NNU 00560-561, +two adult +males, NNU 00557-559, +three adult +females, collected at the same locality as the holotype on +10 June 2021 + +; + +NNU 00569-571, +three adult +females, collected at the same locality as the holotype on +1 July 2021 + +; + +NNU 00875, +one adult +male, NNU 00877-880, +four adult +females, collected at the same locality and time as the +holotype +. +All +specimens were collected by +Wei-Cai Chen. + + + + +Etymology. + +The species name + +Leptobrachella guinanensis + +is derived from the geographic distribution of this species, specifically the southern Guangxi region. The suggested English name for this species is Gui Nan Leaf Litter Toad, while the Chinese name is Gui Nan Zhang Tu Chan (桂南掌突蟾). + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Leptobrachella guinanensis + +sp. nov. can be distinguished from its congeners by a combination of the following characters: (1) SVL 30.5-32.5 mm in males; 38.7-41.8 mm in females; (2) 1/3 toe webbing, wide lateral fringes; (3) dorsal surface shagreened with small, raised tubercles and longitudinal ridges; (4) ventral surface creamy white without dark brown spots; (5) throat immaculate creamy white and its margin concentrated brown spots; (6) iris bicoloured, upper half light copper, transitioning to silver in lower half; (7) crossbars of hindlimbs with tubercles; (8) distinct dermal ridges under the toes; (9) a pair of glands under the vent; (10) tibia-tarsal articulation reaching to centre of eye; (11) relatively higher dominant frequency of advertisement calls (7.3-8.3 kHz). + + + +Description of holotype. +Adult male, SVL = 30.5 mm, head width less than length (HW/HL = 0.93); snout protruding, projecting over the lower jaw; nostril oval, closer to the tip of snout than eye; canthus rostralis distinct; loreal region sloping and slightly concave; interorbital region flat; pupil vertical; eye diameter near equal to snout length (ED/SNT = 0.99); tympanum distinct and rounded, and its diameter conspicuously less than eye diameter (TD/ED = 0.41); supratympanic fold distinct, raised from corner of eye to supra-axillary gland; vomerine teeth absent; vocal sac openings located laterally on the floor of mouth; tongue with a shallow notch at the posterior tip. + +Tips of fingers rounded and slightly swollen; relative finger lengths I <II <IV <III; nuptial pad absent; subarticular tubercles absent; prominent inner palmar tubercle, separated from the small outer palmar tubercle; finger webbing and dermal fringes absent. Tips of toes rounded, slightly swollen; relative toe lengths I <II <V <III <IV; subarticular tubercles absent, replaced by distinct dermal ridges; pronounced large, oval inner metatarsal tubercle; outer metatarsal tubercle absent; 1/3 toe webbing; lateral fringes wide. TIB/SVL = 0.51; tibia-tarsal articulation reaching to the centre of eye; heels not meeting when thighs are appressed at right angles to body (Fig. +5 +). + + + +Figure 5. +The holotype of + +L. guinanensis + +sp. nov. +A +dorsal view +B +ventral view +C +dorsolateral view +D +rear of the back and dorsal view of thighs +E +ventral view of hand +F +ventral view of foot. 1, tubercles on the crossbars; 2, femoral gland; 3, a pair of glands under the vent; 4, toe webbing; 5, wide lateral fringes on toe. + + + +Dorsal surface shagreened with small, raised tubercles and longitudinal ridges; belly and chest smooth without tubercles; anterior throat with several tubercles; ventral surface of limbs with creamy white tubercles; crossbars of hindlimbs with tubercles; flanks with several tubercles; pectoral glands oval, ~ 1.2 mm in diameter; femoral glands oval, ~ 1.3 mm in diameter, located on the posteroventral surface of thighs, closer to the knee than to the vent; supra-axillary glands distinct and rounded, ~ 0.9 mm in diameter; a pair of glands under the vent; and continued ventrolateral glandular line distinct (Fig. +5 +). + + + +Colour of holotype in life. + +Dorsal surface brown, an inverted triangle marking between eyes, irregular markings on shoulder and the rear of back; flanks with light orange tubercles; tympanum pale brown; supratympanic line black from posterior corner of eye to supra-axillary glands; posterior corner of eye silver; wide brown bars on upper lip; flanks with irregular black spots; brown transverse bars distinct on dorsal surface of forelimbs and hindlimbs; upper arm surfaces light orange; ventral surface creamy white without dark brown spots; throat immaculate creamy white and its margin concentrated brown spots; ventral surfaces of limbs purplish grey; pectoral and femoral glands, and a pair of creamy white glands under the vent, supra-axillary glands light orange; pupil black; iris bicoloured, upper half light copper, transitioning to silver in lower half (Fig. +5 +). + + + +Colour of holotype in preservative. +Dorsum and limbs surfaces faded to a uniform grey; brown, inverted triangle marking distinctly visible between eyes; irregular black spots distinct on flanks; throat, chest, and belly creamy white; pectoral, femoral, supra-axillary, and ventrolateral glands creamy white; dark crossbars on limbs, fingers and toes remained distinct; upper arm and tibiotarsus faded to grey. + + +Variation. + +Measurements of the type series are provided in Table +3 +and Suppl. material 1: table S5. The black spots and tubercles on the flanks exhibit variation between individuals. Certain individuals possess more tubercles and longitudinal ridges on their dorsum and hindlimb surfaces (Fig. +6A +), while others display a light brown colouration on their dorsum (Fig. +6B +). + + + +Figure 6. +A +more tubercles and longitudinal ridges on dorsum and hindlimbs surfaces (NNU00875) +B +light brown on dorsum (NNU00569) +C +ventral view of the gravid female (NNU00880) +D +eggs creamy white without black poles. + + + + +Ecology and distribution. + + +Leptobrachella guinanensis + +sp. nov. was discovered in the evergreen forest at SWDS, at an elevation of 400-600 m. The individuals were observed near rocky streams between 20:00-24:00 h. Males were found calling while sitting on rocks near the stream ~ 0.5-1.0 m. Females were found to be gravid with creamy white eggs (Fig. +6C +) and laid their eggs in a bag while being raised indoors (Fig. +6D +). Currently, + +L. guinanensis + +sp. nov. is only known from SWDS. So far within this reserve, we have identified four species of + +Leptobrachella + +, namely + +L. guinanensis + +sp. nov., + +L. shangsiensis + +, + +L. shiwandashanensis + +, and + +L. sungi + +. + + + +Comparison. + +Table +2 +presents a concise overview of the diagnostic morphological characters of species found north of the Isthmus of Kra. + +Leptobrachella guinanensis + +sp. nov. can clearly be distinguished from its phylogenetically close congeners, + +L. ventripunctata + +. + +Leptobrachella guinanensis + +sp. nov. differs from + +L. ventripunctata + +by a larger body size (SVL 30.5-32.5 mm in males; 38.7-41.8 mm in females vs 25.5-28.0 mm in males, 31.5-35.0 mm in females), ventral surface creamy white without brown spots (vs chest and belly creamy white with many scattered brown spots), ventral surfaces of limbs purplish grey (vs ventral surface of limbs grey-brown with dark brown and white speckling or dots), 1/3 toe webbing and toe lateral fringes wide (vs no toe webbing and lateral fringes), dermal ridges distinct under toes (vs absent) (Fig. +7 +), tibia-tarsal articulation reaching the centre of eye (vs the level between tympanum and posterior of eye), heels not meeting when thighs are appressed at right angles to body (vs heels overlapping). In addition, + +L. guinanensis + +sp. nov. differs from + +L. ventripunctata + +by relatively high dominant frequencies (7.3-8.3 kHz vs 6.1-6.4 kHz), call durations (mean 25.5 ms, ranging 23-31 ms vs mean 145 ms, ranging 65-430 ms) and call intervals (mean 91.2 ms, ranging 55-133 ms vs mean 134 ms, ranging 31-416 ms) (Table +4 +). Secondly, + +L. guinanensis + +sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from its sympatric species, + +L. shangsiensis + +, + +L. shiwandashanensis + +, and + +L. sungi + +. + +Leptobrachella guinanensis + +sp. nov. differs from + +L. shangsiensis + +by a larger body size (SVL 30.5-32.5 mm in males, 38.7-41.8 mm in females vs 24.9-29.4 mm in males, 30.8-35.9 mm in females), crossbars of hindlimbs with tubercles (vs lack of tubercles on crossbars of hindlimbs), 1/3 toe webbing (vs toe webbing rudimentary), head width less than length (HW/HL = 0.93 vs HW/HL = 1.15), eye diameter near equal to snout length (ED/SNT = 0.99 vs ED/SNT = 0.78), a pair of glands under the vent (vs absent glands under the vent), dominant frequencies (7.3-8.3 kHz vs 5.5-6.5 kHz), call duration (mean 25.5 ms, ranging 23-31 ms vs mean 66.0 ms, ranging 64-69 ms; Table +4 +). + +Leptobrachella guinanensis + +sp. nov. differs from + +L. shiwandashanensis + +by relatively larger body size (SVL 30.5-32.5 mm in males; 38.7-41.8 mm in females vs 26.8-29.7 mm in males, 33.7-35.9 mm in females), 1/3 toe webbing and wide lateral fringes on toe (vs no webbing and no lateral fringes on toe), tibia-tarsal articulation reaching to the centre of eye (vs posterior of eye), a pair of glands under the vent (vs absent glands under the vent), dominant frequencies (7.3-8.3 kHz vs 5.3-5.7 kHz), call duration (mean 25.5 ms vs mean 226.6 ms; Table +4 +). + +Leptobrachella guinanensis + +sp. nov. differs from + +L. sungi + +by conspicuously smaller body size (SVL 30.5-32.5 mm in males; 38.7-41.8 mm in females vs SVL 48.3-52.7 mm in males, 56.7-58.9 mm in females); iris bicoloured, upper half light copper, transitioning to silver in lower half (vs uniform gold green iris), finger II longer than finger I (vs finger I and II equal in length), tympanum distinct and rounded (vs indistinct), dorsal surface brown, an inverted triangle marking between eyes, irregular markings on shoulder and the rear of back (vs dorsum uniformly light brown or with light spots), dominant frequencies (7.3-8.3 kHz vs 2.0-2.7 kHz), call duration (mean 25.5 ms vs mean 59.4 ms), call intervals (mean 91.2 ms vs mean 478.4 ms) (Table +4 +). + + + +Figure 7. +Morphological characters compared between + +L. guinanensis + +sp. nov. and + +L. ventripunctata + +A1-6 + +L. guinanensis + +sp. nov. +B1-6 + +L. ventripunctata + +A1, B1 +dorsal view +A2, B2 +dorsolateral view +A3, B3 +ventral view +A4, B4 +ventral view of hand +A5, B5 +ventral view of foot +A6, B6 +ventral view of the gravid female. + + + +Finally, + +L. guinanensis + +sp. nov. can be differentiated from other species in the genus + +Leptobrachella + +based on distinctive bioacoustics and morphological diagnostic characters (for details see Table +2 +, Suppl. material 1: table S4), as well as genetic divergences (Suppl. material 1: table S3). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AD/90/37AD908D2014E0949BBA8906FD4DCEBF.xml b/data/37/AD/90/37AD908D2014E0949BBA8906FD4DCEBF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7ffe3fa9339 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AD/90/37AD908D2014E0949BBA8906FD4DCEBF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + +Further contributions to the Hydradephaga (Coleoptera, Haliplidae, Gyrinidae and Dytiscidae) fauna of Prince Edward Island, Canada: new records, distributions and faunal composition + + + +Author + +Alarie, Yves + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +600 + + +103 +129 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.600.8856 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.600.8856 +1313-2970-600-103 +97B30DD8F5B34A569C7478C655230D31 +97B30DD8F5B34A569C7478C655230D31 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Coleoptera Dytiscidae + + + +Ilybius erichsoni (Gemminger & Harold) + + + +Note. +This species is reported from three localities of Prince County (Table 2). + + +Habitat. + +This is a species of forested regions where it occurs amongst dense vegetation, usually +Carex +, at the margins of both temporary and permanent ponds ( +Larson et al. 2000 +). Except for one specimen, which was collected in a shallow creek, all specimens of +Ilybius erichsoni +were collected in the type of habitats mentioned by +Larson et al. (2000) +(Table 1). + + + + +Distribution +in the Maritime Ecozone. + + +This species is known also from the neighboring Provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia ( +Larson et al. 2000 +), and the Magdalen Islands ( +Alarie 2009 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AD/CB/37ADCBA8901551C9857F6E8E77A08B24.xml b/data/37/AD/CB/37ADCBA8901551C9857F6E8E77A08B24.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c3593e68d5b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AD/CB/37ADCBA8901551C9857F6E8E77A08B24.xml @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + +Catalogue of the type material of Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) deposited in the Research Institute of Evolutionary Biology, Tokyo, Japan + + + +Author + +Kaneko, Naoki +Laboratory of Entomology, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 1737 Funako, Atsugi, Kanagawa, 243 - 0034, Japan +naoki.1993062z@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Wada, Kaoru +School of Science and Engineering, Meisei University, 2 - 1 - 1 Hodokubo, Hino, Tokyo 191 - 8506, Japan + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +958 + + +35 +89 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.958.52799 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.958.52799 +1313-2970-958-35 +101EE6D955804A4CB7C063FF9E2993A2 +48B3235B7EBF5310B8A9F2905C223E0F + + + + +Malaia sulawesi Miyake + + + + +Malaia sulawesi +Miyake, 1996: 41-42. + + + +Note. +The following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake): + + +Paratypes. + +58 exs.: 1 ♂ 'Mt. Pedamaran / Tana Toraja / 1985. III-17 / South SULAWESI / Soma, K. leg. // Paratype: / +Malaia +/ +sulawesi +/ Y. MIYAKE, 1996'. 1 ex. 'Puncak Palopo / 1989. III. 31 / Centr. CELEBES // Paratype: / +Malaia +/ +sulawesi +/ Y. MIYAKE, 1996'. 3 exs. 'Palu Pulu / C. Sulawesi / II. 1989 // Paratype: / +Malaia +/ +sulawesi +/ Y. MIYAKE, 1996'. [[44 exs. 'Mt. Pedamaran / S. Sulawesi (real data is C. Sulawesi) / 20. X. 1983 (real date is 20. V. 1983) / K. Soma leg. // Paratype: / +Malaia +/ +sulawesi +/ Y. MIYAKE, 1996']]. [[9 exs. 'Mt. Pedamaran / Tana Toraja / 1983. X-20 (real date is 1983. V-20) / South SULAWESI (real data is Central SULAWESI) / Soma, K. leg. // Paratype: / +Malaia +/ +sulawesi +/ Y. MIYAKE, 1996']]. + + + +Current status. +Valid species. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AD/FC/37ADFC8C713C5C8A8645BBC870D0A3D4.xml b/data/37/AD/FC/37ADFC8C713C5C8A8645BBC870D0A3D4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6a8c358bca0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AD/FC/37ADFC8C713C5C8A8645BBC870D0A3D4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,354 @@ + + + +A further step towards the characterisation of Terebellides (Annelida, Trichobranchidae) diversity in the Northeast Atlantic, with the description of a new species + + + +Author + +Barroso, Maria +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9624-3602 +Departamento de Bioloxia, Universidade da Coruna, A Coruna, Spain +maria.p.barroso@udc.es + + + +Author + +Moreira, Juan +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1374-2033 +Departamento de Biologia (Zoologia) & Centro de Investigacion en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain + + + +Author + +Capa, Maria +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-7961 +Departament de Biologia, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Mallorca, Spain + + + +Author + +Nygren, Arne +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5761-8803 +Sjoefartmuseet Akvariet, Goeteborg, Sweden & Institutionen foer marina vetenskaper, Goeteborgs Universitet, Goeteborg, Sweden + + + +Author + +Parapar, Julio +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7585-6995 +Departamento de Bioloxia, Universidade da Coruna, A Coruna, Spain + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2022 + +2022-11-28 + + +1132 + + +85 +126 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1132.91244 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1132.91244 +1313-2970-1132-85 +4168C32E37A74912A9094912E69030AA +E57A2873FAAC552282A3E1390FF28D3E + + + + + +Terebellides shetlandica Parapar, Moreira & +O'Reilly +, 2016 + + + + + +Figs 2A, B +, 3A +, 4A +, 5 +, 9 +, 10A +, 11 +, 12 + + + + +Terebellides shetlandica +Parapar, Moreira & +O'Reilly +, 2016a: 211-225, figs 1-9, 11. + + +Terebellides shetlandica +Species 1 - +Nygren et al. 2018 +: 18-22, figs 6, 10. + + + +Material examined. + + +30 specimens +(Suppl. material 1), Skagerrak ( +GNM14640 +); Swedish coast (ZMBN116171, ZMBN116181, ZMBN116185, ZMBN116186, ZMBN116187, ZMBN116188, ZMBN116191, ZMBN116192, ZMBN116193, ZMBN116196, ZMBN116198, ZMBN116200, ZMBN116201, ZMBN116202, ZMBN116203, ZMBN116204, ZMBN116206); Norwegian coast (ZMBN116207, ZMBN116208, ZMBN116214, ZMBN116216, ZMBN116219, ZMBN116220, ZMBN116221, ZMBN116226, ZMBN116227, ZMBN116228, ZMBN116235, ZMBN116242) + +. + + + +GenBank accession numbers of material examined (COI). + + +MG024894, MG024895, MG024896, MG024897, MG024898, MG024899, MG024900, MG024901, MG024902, MG024903, MG024904, MG024905, MG024906, MG024907, MG024908, MG024909, MG024910, MG024911, MG024912, MG024913, MG024914, MG024915, MG024916, MG024917, MG024918, MG024919, MG024920, MG024921, MG024922, MG024923, MG024924, MG024925, MG024926, MG024927, MG024928, MG024929, MG024930, MG024931, MG024932, MG024933, MG024934, MG024935, MG024936, MG024937, MG024938, MG024939, MG024940, MG024941, MG024942, MG024943, MG024944, MG024945, MG024946, MG024947, MG024948, MG024949, MG024950, MG024951, MG024952, MG024953, MG024954, MG024955, MG024956 + +. + + + +Diagnostic features of studied material. + +Complete individuals ranging from 5.0-16.0 mm in length (Fig. +9 +). Branchial dorsal lobes lamellae provided with well-developed papillary projections and branchial ventral lobes provided with long filaments, ranging from 175.0-225.0 +µm +in length (Figs +2A, B +, +4A +, +5A, B +). Between 22-26 lamellae on dorsal lobes (Fig. +5A, B +). Lateral lappets present on TC 1-4; dorsal projections of thoracic notopodia on TC 2 and TC 3 (Fig. +5B +). Geniculate chaetae in TC 5, acutely bent, with poorly marked capitium (Fig. +5C +). Ciliated papilla dorsal to thoracic notopodia not observed. From TC 7, neuropodia with one row of +type +4 thoracic uncini per torus, with rostrum/capitium length ratio of ~ 2:1 and capitium with a first row of small teeth, followed by several smaller teeth (Fig. +5D +). Abdomen with 25-34 pairs of neuropodia with +type +2 uncini (Fig. +5E, F +). Copepods attached to body surface in +three specimens +(Fig. +5B +). + + + +Figure 9. +Relationship between number of abdominal chaetigers and body length (complete specimens considered except for + +T. irinae + +). + + + + +Colour pattern. + +MG staining pattern characterised by compact green colourant in SG 1-6, then turning into striped pattern in SG 7-14 and fading in following segments (Fig. +12 +). Similar to pattern 1. + + + +Nucleotide diagnostic features. + +All sequences of + +Terebellides shetlandica + +share and are distinguished from other available + +Terebellides + +sequences in unique combinations of nucleotides (underlined) at the given position of our alignment: 78-98: CCAACCCGGAGCCTATTTAGGT, 186-192: CGGAAAC, 210-219: GCTAGGCGCC, 228-234: GGCATTC, 264-276: TCTCCCGCCTGCC, 288- 292: CGTT, 306: C, 333-342: CGTCTACCCT, 351-369: AGACAATATGGCACACGCC, 381-402: AGATCTGGCTATTTTCTCCCTA, 453-459: AGTAATA, 511-522: TCAGCTATAATC, 535-558: TTACTTCTTTCTCTGCCAGTTCTG. + + + +Type locality. + +NW Hutton Oilfield, between Shetland Islands and Norway, +61°10'N +, +01°12'E +( +Parapar et al. 2016a +). + + + +Distribution and bathymetry. + +Norwegian coast and shelf, North Sea, Skagerrak, Kattegat; 25-375 m deep; 92.7% of specimens present at depths below 200 m (Figs +10A +, +11 +, Suppl. material 1). + + + +Figure 10. +Geographic distribution of species of + +Terebellides + +in Northeast Atlantic Ocean +A + +Terebellides shetlandica + +Parapar, Moreira & +O'Reilly +, 2016 +B + +Terebellides lavesquei + +sp. nov. +C + +Terebellides atlantis + +Williams, 1984 +D + +Terebellides irinae + +Gagaev, 2009 +E + +Terebellides williamsae + +Jirkov, 1989 +F + +Terebellides gracilis + +Malm, 1874. Pink star denotes the type locality of each taxon. + + + + +Figure 11. +Bathymetric distribution of + +Terebellides + +species studied in this work. + + + + +Figure 12. +Body MG staining patterns in ventral view of + +Terebellides + +species. + +Terebellides shetlandica + +Parapar, Moreira & +O'Reilly +, 2016, + +Terebellides lavesquei + +sp. nov., + +Terebellides atlantis + +Williams, 1984, + +Terebellides irinae + +Gagaev, 2009, + +Terebellides williamsae + +Jirkov, 1989 and + +Terebellides gracilis + +Malm, 1874. Segments indicated in Arabic numbers. + + + + +Remarks. + + +Terebellides shetlandica + +is a small species, reaching up to 16 mm length and is characterised by having branchiae of type 3 and long filaments in ventral branchial lobes, thoracic uncini of type 4, abdominal uncini of type 2 and lacking papillae on margins of branchial lamellae (Table +1 +). +Parapar et al. (2016a) +pointed out that + +T. atlantis + +is the most similar species to + +T. shetlandica + +; this is confirmed here according to molecular analyses and morphological examination. Both species are small sized (length: + +T. shetlandica + +, 5-16 mm; + +T. atlantis + +, 10-16 mm) and have branchiae of type 3, with free branchial lobes. However, the branchiae of + +T. shetlandica + +have a high number (22-26) of tightly packed branchial lamellae, all lobes are similar in shape and length and ventral ones bear long filaments whereas + +T. atlantis + +has a fewer number of branchiae (10-11), lamellae are not packed, lobes differ in shape and size and ventral lobes bear shorter filaments. Furthermore, the range of abdominal chaetigers number is higher in + +T. shetlandica + +than in + +T. atlantis + +(25-34 vs. 23-28 respectively). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AF/20/37AF20D66E80C8D9B80B80BA686E7721.xml b/data/37/AF/20/37AF20D66E80C8D9B80B80BA686E7721.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d3e5a68ee6d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AF/20/37AF20D66E80C8D9B80B80BA686E7721.xml @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the pelidnotine scarabs (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae, Rutelini) and annotated catalog of the species and subspecies + + + +Author + +Moore, Matthew R. +Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida Building 1881 Natural Drive Area, Steinmetz Hall, Box 110620, Gainesville, FL 32611 - 0620, USA + + + +Author + +Jameson, Mary L. +Department of Biological Sciences, Wichita State University 1845 Fairmount, Box 26, Wichita, KS 67260 - 0026, USA +maryliz.jameson@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Garner, Beulah H. +Natural History Museum, Insects Division, Department of Life Sciences, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, UK + + + +Author + +Audibert, Cedric +Musee des Confluences, Centre de Conservation et d'Etude des Collections, 13 A Rue Bancel, F- 69007 Lyon, France + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. +Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P. O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, K 1 P 6 P 4, Canada + + + +Author + +Seidel, Matthias + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +2017-04-06 + + +666 + + +1 +349 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.666.9191 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.666.9191 +1313-2970-666-1 +B3C377E8BBB14F328AECA2C22D1E625A +C43EEB41A94B930FFE439D1FAD29FF9C +579453 + + + + +Pelidnota vitticollis Burmeister, 1844 + + + + +Pelidnota vitticollis +Burmeister, 1844: 396 [original combination]. + + +Pelidnota bivittata +(Swederus) [syn. by F. +Bates 1904 +: 257]. + + +Pelidnota vitticollis +Burmeister [revised species status by +Ohaus 1913 +: 504-506]. + + +Pelidnota (Ganonota) vitticollis +Burmeister [new subgeneric combination by +Ohaus 1918 +: 28]. + + +Pelidnota (Strigidia) vitticollis +Burmeister [new subgeneric combination by +Machatschke 1970 +: 157]. + + +Pelidnota (Odontognathus) vitticollis +Burmeister [new subgeneric combination by +Hardy 1975 +: 4]. + + +Strigidia vitticollis +(Burmeister) [new combination by +Soula 2006 +: 43-44]. + + +Pelidnota (Strigidia) vitticollis +Burmeister [revised combination and revised subgeneric combination by + +Oezdikmen +2009 + +: 145]. + + +Pelidnota vitticollis +Burmeister [removal of subgeneric classification by +Soula 2009 +: 116]. + + + +Distribution. + +BRAZIL: +Espirito +Santo, Rio de Janeiro, Santa Catarina ( +Burmeister 1844 +, +Ohaus 1918 +, +1934b +, +Machatschke 1972 +, +Soula 2006 +, +Krajcik 2008 +). + + + +Types. + +Types of + +Pelidnota vitticollis + +at MHNN ( +Soula 2006 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AF/2A/37AF2A098C6D1AF737D037C6466A0D06.xml b/data/37/AF/2A/37AF2A098C6D1AF737D037C6466A0D06.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5882d6cabc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AF/2A/37AF2A098C6D1AF737D037C6466A0D06.xml @@ -0,0 +1,693 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Cyperaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/cyperaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Schoenoplectus supinus +(L.) Palla + + + + + +Zwerg-Flechtbinse + + + + +Art ISFS: 378600 Checklist: 1042260 +Cyperaceae +Schoenoplectus +Schoenoplectus supinus (L.) Palla + + + +Bestimmungsschluessel + + + +Zusammenfassung + + + + +Artbeschreibung + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: + +5-20 cm +hoch, +bueschelig + +, mittlere +Staengel +aufrecht, seitliche +ausgebreitet-niederliegend +. +Blaetter +hohlrinnig. +Bluetenstand +scheinbar +seitenstaendig +, mit 1-5 sitzenden, +4-8 mm +langen, braunen +Aehrchen +, + +das aufrechte Hochblatt oft +laenger +als der +Staengel + +(nur bei dieser +Sch. +-Art). Meist keine Perigonborsten. Frucht 3kantig, braun, ca. 1,5 mm lang. + + + + +Bluetezeit + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: 6-9 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: Schlammige, zeitweise +ueberschwemmte +Ufer / kollin / +Suedliches +TI + + + + +Verbreitung global + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: Weltweit verbreitet + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte + +(nach +Landolt & al. 2010 +) + +4 + w + 32-44 + 2.t.2n=28 + + + +Status + + + +Status IUCN +: Vom Aussterben bedroht + + + + +Nationale +Prioritaet +: 2 - Hohe nationale +Prioritaet + + +Internationale Verantwortung +: 1 - Gering Erhalten/ +Foerdern +Gefaehrdungen +Art gilt in der Schweiz als ausgestorben. Keine Massnahmen +moeglich +. +Regelmaessige +Kontrolle in den Gebieten, in denen die Art +frueher +vorgekommen ist Anatomie + + +Zusammenfassung +der Blattanatomie Obere Epidermiszellen +groesser +als untere. Punktuelle Versteifungselemente am Blattrand und bei der Blattrippe. + + +Zusammenfassung der Stammanatomie + + +Umriss rund oder oval. +Leitbuendel +in mehreren Reihen. Konische +Stuetzen +. Grosse, +unregelmaessige +Intercellularen. Epidermiszellen aussen verholzt. + + +Beschreibung (Englisch) + + +Culm-diameter +1-2 mm +, center full, radius of culm in relation to wall thickness 1:1. Outline circular with a smooth surface. Culm-center full, containing unlignified cells. Epidermis cells inside thin, peripheral thicker-walled (lignified). Large vascular bundles arranged in one peripheral row. Chlorenchyma present, continuous peripheral belt with unlignified round cells (like a large cortex). Sclerenchyma belt absent. Groups of sclerenchyma at the periphery, round. Vascular bundles collateral closed. Sclerenchymatic sheath around vascular bundles at the centripetal side drop like onesided large (Thpha-type). Vessels arrangement in vascular bundles in lateral position. Largest vessel in the bundle 20-50 +μm +. Cavities (intercellulars) between parenchyma-cells net-like. Crystals absent. + + + +Oekologie + + +Lebensform Therophyt + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + + +2.5.1 - +Einjaehrige +Schlammflur (Zwergbinsenflur) ( +Nanocyperion +) + + + +
+
+ + + +fett + +Dominante Art, welche das Aussehen des Lebensraumes +mitpraegt + +Charakterart +Weniger strikt an den Lebensraum gebundene Art + + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F +nass; Feuchtigkeit stark wechselnd (mehr als ++/- +2 Stufen) +Lichtzahl LhellSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rschwach sauer bis neutral (pH 4.5-7.5)Temperaturzahl Twarm-kollin
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +naehrstoffarm + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subozeanisch (hohe Luftfeuchtigkeit, geringe Temperaturschwankungen, eher milde Winter)
+ + + + +Abhaengigkeit +vom Wasser + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Fluesse +0 - unbedeutend, keine Bindung.
Ruhiges Wasser2 - Schwerpunktlebensraum
Grundwasser0 - unbedeutend, keine Bindung.
+ + +Nomenklatur + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Schoenoplectus supinus +(L.) Palla + + + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Zwerg-Flechtbinse +, +Zwerg-Teichbinse +, +Zwerg-Seebinse +, +Zwerg-Seeried +Nom +francais +: + +Schoenoplectus +couche + +Nome italiano: +Lisca prostrata + + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Schoenoplectus supinus (L.) Palla + + +Checklist 2017 + +378600
= +Schoenoplectus supinus (L.) Palla + + +Flora Helvetica 2001 + +2490
= +Schoenoplectus supinus (L.) Palla + + +Flora Helvetica 2012 + +2666
= +Schoenoplectus supinus (L.) Palla + + +Flora Helvetica 2018 + +2666
= +Schoenoplectus supinus (L.) Palla + + +Index synonymique 1996 + +378600
= +Schoenoplectus supinus (L.) Palla + + +Landolt 1977 + +444
= +Schoenoplectus supinus (L.) Palla + + +Landolt 1991 + +388
= +Schoenoplectus supinus (L.) Palla + + +SISF/ISFS 2 + +378600
= +Schoenoplectus supinus (L.) Palla + + +Welten & Sutter 1982 + +2391
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Status Indigenat +: Archeophyt: vor der Entdeckung von Amerika in der Region aufgetreten (vor 1500) + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein + + +Status Rote Liste national 2016 + + +Status IUCN +: Vom Aussterben bedroht + + + +Zusaetzliche +Informationen + +Kriterien IUCN: C1 + + +Status Rote Liste regional 2019 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Biogeografische RegionenStatusKriterien IUCN
Jura (JU)--
Mittelland (MP)verschollen, vermutlich in der Schweiz ausgestorben (Critically Endangered, Probably Extinct)
Alpennordflanke (NA)verschollen, vermutlich in der Schweiz ausgestorben (Critically Endangered, Probably Extinct)
+Alpensuedflanke +(SA) +vom Aussterben bedroht (Critically Endangered)C1
+Oestliche +Zentralalpen (EA) +--
Westliche Zentralalpen (WA)--
+ + + +Status nationale +Prioritaet +/Verantwortung + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ +Nationale +Prioritaet + + +2 - Hohe nationale +Prioritaet +
+Massnahmenbedarf +2 - Klarer Massnahmebedarf
+ +Internationale Verantwortung + +1 - Gering
+ +Ueberwachung +Bestaende + + +2 - +Ueberwachung +ist +noetig +
+ +Schutzstatus + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+International (Berner Konvention) +Nein
+TI + +Vollstaendig +geschuetzt +(23.01.2013)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Schweiz +--
+GE + +Vollstaendig +geschuetzt +(25.07.2007)
+ + + + +Erhalten/ +Foerdern +Gefaehrdungen +und Massnahmen Art gilt in der Schweiz als ausgestorben. Keine Massnahmen +moeglich +. +Regelmaessige +Kontrolle in den Gebieten, in denen die Art +frueher +vorgekommen ist + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AF/39/37AF3977DCFC29DCDEE1A5620F990C16.xml b/data/37/AF/39/37AF3977DCFC29DCDEE1A5620F990C16.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f1ed26a2931 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AF/39/37AF3977DCFC29DCDEE1A5620F990C16.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +Hornmilben (Oribatida) [pages 418 to 494] + + + +Author + +Weigmann, G. + + + +Author + +Miko, L. + +text + + +2006 +Goecke & Evers + +Keltern + + + +Hornmilben (Oribatida) [Dahl, Tierwelt Deutschlands, Teil 76] + + + +418 +494 + + + + +http://www.goeckeevers.de/verlag/dahl.html + +book chapter +Weigmann2006pp418to494 + + + + + +Oribatula +tibialis + +(Nicolet, 1855) [233c-e] + + + + +Syn., Tax.: +Notaspis tibialis +Nicolet, 1855. +Oribatula t. +: Sellnick 1928; Willmann 1931 (B); Wunderle et al. 1990 (B); Perez-Inigo 1993 (B). + + + + +-? +O. venusta +Berlese, 1908: Mahunka 1994a (B). + + + + +Oekologie +: Relativ +euryoek +; in Wiesen- und +Waldboeden +, auch in Moos- und Flechtenrasen auf Substrat; salztolerant. + + + +Verbreitung: Holarktis. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AF/50/37AF50875426D436E68EE7486E365BA1.xml b/data/37/AF/50/37AF50875426D436E68EE7486E365BA1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cd0de54d96f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AF/50/37AF50875426D436E68EE7486E365BA1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ + + + +Two new species of the genus Epuraea Erichson, 1843 from China (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae, Epuraeinae) + + + +Author + +Zhao, Mengjiao + + + +Author + +Huang, Min + + + +Author + +Yang, Xingke + + + +Author + +Kirejtshuk, Alexander G. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2014 + +445 + + +107 +115 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.445.7163 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.445.7163 +1313-2970-445-107 +C38F86BAA790436A816C889A4FAD208F +C38F86BAA790436A816C889A4FAD208F + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Coleoptera Nitidulidae + + + +Epuraea (Micruria) lanuginosa Zhao, Huang & Kirejtshuk +sp. n. +Figs 1-8 + + + +Type material. +Holotype. ♂, China: Sichuan, Pingwu, Laohegou; 1800m, 7.VII.2013, Lingling Ren leg. (NWSUAF). Paratypes. (1♂, 3♀), same data as holotype (NWSUAF). + + +Description. +Body. Length 3.7 mm, breadth 1.7 mm, height 0.9 mm. Oblong, moderately convex; dorsum dark brown and with bronze lustre, underside reddish-brown with appendages slightly lighter, pronotal and elytral margins light reddish to yellow; dorsum with long, strongly conspicuous and sparse silver yellowish hairs, which are three times longer than distance between their insertions (Figs 1, 2). + + +Figures 1, 2. +Epuraea (Micruria) lanuginosus +sp. n. male. 1 habitus, dorsal view 2 same, ventral view. Scale bar = 1 mm. + + +Integument. Head with irregular and indistinct punctures, surface between them microreticulated. Pronotum with finer punctures nearly as large as eye facets; interspaces between them greater than a puncture diameter and smoothly microreticulated. Scutellum triangular with shallow punctures smaller than punctures on pronotum and interspaces among them equal to a puncture diameter or greater. Elytra with punctures slightly smaller than those on scutellum, interspaces among them greater than a puncture diameter and microreticulated. Pygidial surface nearly as that of elytra, but with shallower punctures and denser pubescence. Abdominal ventrites with moderately distinct punctures slightly smaller than eye facets in diameter, interspaces among them smoothly microreticulated. +Head. Head slightly convex and eyes medium-sized. Labrum with a shallow median incision (Fig. 3). Antennal grooves start from hypostomal sinuses and are convergent posteriorly. Ultimate labial palpomere approximately 3 times as long as thick and somewhat narrowed at apex. Antennae slightly longer than head width, club approximately 2/5 of total length and about 1.5 times as long as wide. Pronotum moderately convex and 1.8 times as broad as long with apex emarginate, base lightly sinuate near posterior angles, sides arcuate with margins subexplanate and somewhat translucent, anterior angles square and posterior ones projecting slightly; widest at posterior angles, narrowed to both base and apex. Prosternal process curved along procoxae, widened apically (Fig. 4). Elytra much longer than their combined width (1.3:1), their sides arcuate and margins narrower than pronotum, with separately rounded apices, leaving uncovered the pygidium and part of preceding tergite. Pygidium triangular, apex of anal sclerite exposed from under pygidium. Distance between mesocoxae as great as width of antennal club and distance between metacoxae about three times as great as that between mesocoxae. Elytral epipleura at base as wide as antennal club. Metaventrite slightly convex with a distinct median depression. + + +Figures 3-8. +Epuraea (Micruria) lanuginosus +sp. n. 3 labrum, dorsal view 4 prosternal process, ventral view 5 tegmen, ventral view 6 penis trunk, dorsal view 7 ovipositors, ventral view 8 protibia, dorsal view. Scale bars = 0.2 mm: a for Figs 3-7, b for Fig. 8. + + +Legs. All tibiae narrow and long; protibia with teeth gradually increasing in size along outer edge and two distinct larger teeth at apex. Mesotibia slightly curved inside near apex; tarsal claws with strong teeth at base (Fig. 8). +Aedeagus. Tegmen and penis trunk moderately sclerotized (Figs 5, 6). + + +Female. +The apex of mesotibiae not curved. Ovipositor moderately long and weakly sclerotized (Fig. 7). + + +Etymology. + +The name derives from the conspicuously pubescent dorsum of the species ( +'lanuginosus' +in Latin means +'woolly' +, +'downy' +). + + + +Notes. + +Having moderately convex body, comparatively distinct dorsal punctation, subexplanate pronotal sides, simple mesotibiae, truncate apex of penis trunk the new species seems to belong to the +consobrina +-group which is hitherto known to comprise the following species: +Epuraea (Micruria) bergeri +Sjoeberg +, 1939; +Epuraea (Micruria) consobrina +Grouvelle, 1892; +Epuraea (Micruria) kompantzevi +Kirejtshuk, 1999; +Epuraea (Micruria) pulliginis +sp. n.; +Epuraea (Micruria) reticulata +Grouvelle, 1892, +Epuraea (Micruria) scapha +Kirejtshuk, 1999, +Epuraea (Micruria) subita +Kirejtshuk, 1999 and +Epuraea (Micruria) subreticulata +Grouvelle, 1892. It can be easily distinguished from all the members of the group in the bronze lustre on its rather dark dorsum, deep narrow depression along the middle of metaventrite and peculiar structure of aedeagus. Besides, it differs from: + + +Epuraea (Micruria) bergeri +in the less convex pronotum narrowed at base and with more shallowly emarginate anterior edge and more clearly explanate and translucent sides, elytra more narrowing towards transversely oblique apices (not transverse), rounded apex of prosternal process, simple metafemur and metatibia, strong tooth at base of tarsal claws, ovipositor with wider base of coxites; + + +Epuraea (Micruria) consobrina +in the subunicolorous disks of pronotum and elytra, coarser and deeper punctation (particularly on elytra), longer and denser silver pubescence, narrower explanate stripes of elytra, obliquely rounded elytral apices (not obliquely truncate), rounded apex of prosternal process, strong tooth at base of tarsal claws, narrower ovipositor with shorter coxites; + + +Epuraea (Micruria) kompantzevi +in the more slender (not subovoid) body, denser and more clear dorsal punctation, pronotum narrowing at base, less gently sloping pronotal and elytral sides, subtruncate elytral apices (never forming a join curve), projecting subapical teeth of protibiae, lack of sexual dimorphism in elytral apices; + + +Epuraea (Micruria) pulliginis +sp. n. in the much denser dorsal punctation, silver pubescence, elytra less narrowing towards subtruncate apices, more projecting subapical teeth on protibiae, narrower coxites of ovipositor; + + +Epuraea (Micruria) reticulata +in the subunicolorous dorsum, much denser and more distinct dorsal punctation, denser and more conspicuous dorsal pubescence, widely rounded lobes of labrum, elytra more narrowing towards transversely oblique apices (not transverse), simple male metafemora, projecting subapical teeth of protibiae; + + +Epuraea (Micruria) scapha +in the much more slender body, denser and more clear dorsal punctation, less gently sloping pronotal and elytral sides, subtruncate elytral apices (not forming a join curve), projecting subapical teeth of protibiae, simple male metafemora, meso- and metatibiae, and lack of sexual dimorphism in elytral apices, ovipositor with coxites shorter and narrower at base; + + +Epuraea (Micruria) subita +in the less convex body and particularly pronotum with more clearly explanate and translucent sides, rounded apex of prosternal process, more elytra narrowing towards transversely oblique apices (not transverse), simple metafemur, strong tooth at base of tarsal claws, ovipositor with wider base of coxites. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AF/51/37AF5135AFD07B2AD04A41156B7EC532.xml b/data/37/AF/51/37AF5135AFD07B2AD04A41156B7EC532.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..59228ff8a87 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AF/51/37AF5135AFD07B2AD04A41156B7EC532.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +The millipede genus Eviulisoma Silvestri, 1910 in Kenya, with descriptions of new species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae) + + + +Author + +VandenSpiegel, Didier + + + +Author + +Golovatch, Sergei I. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2014 + +459 + + +11 +34 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.459.8621 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.459.8621 +1313-2970-459-11 +9659104C809E45E98C0851F2524677AE +9659104C809E45E98C0851F2524677AE + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Polydesmida Paradoxosomatidae + + + +Eviulisoma taita +sp. n. +Figs 5, 6, Maps 1, 2 + + + + +Type +material. + + +Holotype ♂ (MRAC 22631), Kenya, Taita Hills, Mbololo Forest, +S03°22.56' +, +E38°20.70' +, 1800-1900 m a.s.l., pitfall traps, +III-IV +.1999, leg. L. Rogo. + + +Paratypes: 17 ♂, 13 ♀, 4 juv. (MRAC 18084), 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (ZMUM +ρ +2444), same data, together with holotype; 2 ♂, 2 ♀ (MRAC 18029), same locality, pitfall traps, 3.VII-2.VIII.1999, leg. R. Mwakos; 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (MRAC 18412), same locality, 8.XII.1999, leg. D. VandenSpiegel & J. P. Michiels; 1 ♀, 1 juv. (MRAC 17990), same locality, 22.VI.1999, leg. D. VandenSpiegel; 9 ♂, 8 ♀, 33 juv. (MRAC 18039), same locality, 1800-1900 m a.s.l., sieving, 2-10.VII.1999, leg. R. Mwakos; 1 ♀ (MRAC 17976), same locality, 21.VI.1999, leg. D. VandenSpiegel; 1 ♂, 1 ♂ fragment, 1 ♀, 1 ♀ fragment (MRAC 18414), same locality, 8.XII.1999, leg. D. VandenSpiegel & J. P. Michiels; 3 ♂, 1 ♀ (MRAC 18100), Taita Hills, Yale Forest, 1840 m, +S03°39' +, +E38°33' +, pitfall traps, +III-IV +.1999, leg. L. Rogo; 4 ♂, 4 ♀, 22 juv. (MRAC 18451), Taita Hills, Fururu Forest, +S03°26' +, +E38°20' +, 9.XII.1999; 1 ♂, 3 ♀, 20 juv. (MRAC 18495), same locality, Winkler extraction, 9.12.1999; 5 ♂, 4 ♀, 1 juv. (MRAC 18576), Taita Hills, Mwachora Forest, Winkler extraction, 10.XII.1999, all leg. D. VandenSpiegel & J. P. Michiels; 2 ♂ (MRAC 22632), same data; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, 1 ♀ fragment, 1 juv. (MRAC 22633), same locality, 15.II.2004, leg. T. Spanhove & M. Chovu. + + + +Name. +To emphasize the type locality, a noun in apposition. + + +Diagnosis. +Differs from congeners by a broadly and regularly rounded hypoproct, coupled with the presence of sternal cones behind ♂ body segment 7, and the lamellar, slender, apically unciform and bidentate solenophore (sph) carrying a lateral tooth midway (t) and reaching about as long as a flagelliform solenomere (sl), both sph and sl being considerably higher than a rather simple, similarly slender, postfemoral process (p). See also Key below. + + +Description. +Length of adults ca 16-23 (♂) or 18-28 mm (♀), width of midbody metazonae 1.5-2.7 (♂) or 2.0-3.7 mm (♀). Holotype ca 16 mm long and 1.6 mm wide on midbody metazonae. +Coloration from pallid to annulated chocolate brown due to darker metazonae, often with a thin axial pigment line and a similar transverse pigment line in posterior 1/3 of metaterga. + +Other adult characters as in +Eviulisoma ngaia +sp. n., except as follows. + + +Vertigial +region with a few setae (Figs 5A, 6D). Stricture between pro- and metazonae very delicately striolate. Tegument generally smooth, often with only a few arcuate striae near and below ozopores. Pleurosternal carinae rather evident, arcuate ridges devoid of a caudal tooth, visible until segment 16 (♂, ♀). Epiproct long (Fig. 5B), faintly concave apically, subapical lateral papillae evident, well removed from tip. Hypoproct broadly rounded. + + +Setose lobe between ♂ coxae 4 (Fig. 6E) low, subtrapeziform, slightly rounded apically. Sternite between ♂ coxae 5 densely setose, with paramedian cones caudally (Fig. 6E); sterna between ♂ coxae 6 and 7 unusually deeply excavate and ledge-shaped for accommodation of gonopod tips (Figs 5C, 6 +D-F +), the +excavation's +frontal edge being sparsely setose +( +Fig. 6E). Postgonopodial sterna mostly with small, low, blunt cones near each coxa, anterior pair being even smaller than caudal one on each diplosegment. ♂ tarsi considerably to only slightly longer than tibiae (Fig. 6C). Legs 1.5-1.6 (♂) or 0.9-1.1 (♀) times as long as body height. ♂ tibiae and tarsi with ventral brushes until last two leg-pairs (Fig. 6C). + + +Gonopods (Figs 5C, 6 +F-J +) with a lamellar, slender, apically unciform and bidentate solenophore (sph) carrying a lateral tooth midway (t) and being about as long as a flagelliform solenomere (sl), both sph and sl considerably higher than a rather simple, similarly slender, postfemoral process (p). + +Vulvae without peculiarities, as in Fig. 6A, B. + + +Figure 5. +Eviulisoma taita +sp. n., ♂ paratype. A anterior part of body, lateral view B posterior part of body, lateral view C body segments 5-7, ventral view. Drawn not to scale. + + + + +Figure 6. +Eviulisoma taita +sp. n., ♀ (A, B) & ♂ ( +C-J +) paratypes. A, D anterior part of body, ventrocaudal and ventral views, respectively B right vulva, ventrocaudal view C distal part of a midbody leg, lateral view E sterna between coxae 4-7, ventral view F same, but with left gonopod placed into sternal pocket-shaped excavation G both gonopods in situ, ventral view H, J left gonopod, mesal and lateral views, respectively I tips of both gonopods in situ, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.5 (A, C, D), 0.2 (G), 0.1 (E, F, H, J) & 0.05 mm (B, I). Designations in text. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/AF/BA/37AFBAEE210BB75A022BB857DFD4FBEB.xml b/data/37/AF/BA/37AFBAEE210BB75A022BB857DFD4FBEB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..29e70a7eb31 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/AF/BA/37AFBAEE210BB75A022BB857DFD4FBEB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Aptesis improba (Gravenhorst, 1829) + + + + +Phygadeuon improbus +Gravenhorst, 1829 + + +exigua +(Habermehl, 1909, +Microcryptus +) + + +bisignata +(Habermehl, 1919, +Microcryptus +) + + + +Distribution +Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B0/55/37B055A8AB07EAE1FFA4279A85856405.xml b/data/37/B0/55/37B055A8AB07EAE1FFA4279A85856405.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1cba4b60799 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B0/55/37B055A8AB07EAE1FFA4279A85856405.xml @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828--8013 + + + + +Aprostocetus (Aprostocetus) calamarius Graham, 1961 + + + +Distribution +England, Ireland + + +Notes + +Added by +Jennings (2003) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B0/7C/37B07CA35A51134576A470E7D0AD44CA.xml b/data/37/B0/7C/37B07CA35A51134576A470E7D0AD44CA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..387eff8a0a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B0/7C/37B07CA35A51134576A470E7D0AD44CA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part M) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +651 +689 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Marrubium crispum +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +, ed. 2, 2 + +: 1674. 1763 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Italia, Hispania. Arduini." RCN: 4259. + + + + +Lectotype +(Seybold in Jarvis & al. in +Taxon +50: 513. 2001): +Arduino s.n. +, Herb. Linn. No. 738.7 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + + +Ballota africana + +(L.) Benth. + +( +Lamiaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B0/95/37B0950F4C5F5C429BCEB9A5F19EBBF4.xml b/data/37/B0/95/37B0950F4C5F5C429BCEB9A5F19EBBF4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..979f7a595f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B0/95/37B0950F4C5F5C429BCEB9A5F19EBBF4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + + +New Curculionoidea records from New Brunswick, Canada with an addition to the fauna of Nova Scotia + + + +Author + +Webster, Reginald P. +24 Mill Stream Drive, Charters Settlement, NB, Canada E 3 C 1 X 1 +reginaldwebster@rogers.com + + + +Author + +Anderson, Robert S. +Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P. O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, ON, Canada K 1 P 6 P 4 + + + +Author + +Webster, Vincent L. +Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent St., P. O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB, Canada E 3 B 5 P 7 + + + +Author + +Alderson, Chantelle A. +Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent St., P. O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB, Canada E 3 B 5 P 7 + + + +Author + +Hughes, Cory C. +Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent St., P. O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB, Canada E 3 B 5 P 7 + + + +Author + +Sweeney, Jon D. +Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent St., P. O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB, Canada E 3 B 5 P 7 + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +2016-03-24 + + +573 + + +367 +386 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.573.7444 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.573.7444 +1313-2970-573-367 +EF058E9CE462499AB2C12EC244BFA95E +6E0CFF8EE444565AFFEDFF930340FFFB +116840 + + + + +Nanophyes marmoratus marmoratus (Goeze, 1777)† + + + +Material examined. + +New Brunswick, Queens Co. +, + + + +Grand +Lake Meadows + +P.N.A. + +at Rt. 105, +45.8461°N +, +66.2061°W +, +12.VI.2014 +, +22.VI.2014 +, +R.P. Webster +// +Old +field near flood plain forest, sweeping (4, RWC). + +York Co. + +, +Keswick Ridge +, +45.9962°N +, +66.8781°W +, +3-18.VI.2015 +, +18-30.VI.2015 +, +C. Alderson +& +V. Webster +// +Hardwood forest +, +green Lindgren funnel trap +in canopy (1), +black Lindgren funnel trap + +1 m + +high (1) (2, RWC); Fredericton, Odell Park, +45.9508°N +, +66.6723°W +, +29.VI-14.VII.2015 +, +C. Alderson +& +V. Webster +// +Hardwood +stand, +Lindgren funnel trap +in canopy (1, AFC) + +. + + + +Distribution in Canada and Alaska. + +MB, ON, QC, +NB +( +Bousquet et al. 2013 +). + + + +Comments. + + +Nanophyes marmoratus marmoratus + +(Goeze) was introduced into North America to control purple loosestrife, + +Lythrum salicaria + +L. ( +Anderson 2003 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B0/D3/37B0D3ECF926C9EBC09210BBE7674ADB.xml b/data/37/B0/D3/37B0D3ECF926C9EBC09210BBE7674ADB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..18f8a2ec9bc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B0/D3/37B0D3ECF926C9EBC09210BBE7674ADB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,159 @@ + + + +Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 3. Plumbaginaceae bis Compositae (2 nd edition): Orobanchaceae + + + +Author + +Hess, Hans Ernst + + + +Author + +Landolt, Elias + + + +Author + +Hirzel, Rosmarie + +text + +1976 +Birkhaeuser Verlag + + +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.292249 + +book +292249 +10.5281/zenodo.292249 +3-7643-0556-8 + + + +<subSubSection id="B3580A2ACF22EDA5C08482D6B3F34D4A" pageId="null" pageNumber="253" type="nomenclature"> +<paragraph id="B5BB9B69993CDACB5D08F8F2C31B656D" pageId="null" pageNumber="253"> +<taxonomicName id="EF8C97FE1A55CD66A37FBFBD95A38CF3" authority="Borkh." authorityName="Borkh." class="Magnoliopsida" family="Orobanchaceae" genus="Orobanche" kingdom="Plantae" order="Lamiales" pageId="null" pageNumber="253" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="arenaria"> +Orobanche +<normalizedToken id="76C7AF852EBD08379B7C2F807AAB4E1E" originalValue="arenária" pageId="null" pageNumber="253">arenaria</normalizedToken> +Borkh. +</taxonomicName> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="373AD8FC6FB60A0EED839533B51FEF04" pageId="null" pageNumber="253" type="reference_group"> +<paragraph id="3C07050266FA15C6C4C72F147445D851" pageId="null" pageNumber="253"> +( +<taxonomicName id="B0B386956BE921E7C53F91078806F4AA" class="Magnoliopsida" family="Orobanchaceae" genus="Orobanche" kingdom="Plantae" order="Lamiales" pageId="null" pageNumber="253" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="levis"> +<emphasis id="3325C0923AD6CFEA9C1E7F1A2F1475C7" italics="true" pageId="null" pageNumber="253">O. levis</emphasis> +</taxonomicName> +auct., +<taxonomicName id="134388372C355755A7F0129D46363C86" class="Magnoliopsida" family="Orobanchaceae" genus="Phelipaea" higherTaxonomySource="GBIF" kingdom="Plantae" order="Lamiales" pageId="null" pageNumber="253" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="arenaria"> +<emphasis id="481D97632E93E51BD4F74C96F160B9A5" italics="true" pageId="null" pageNumber="253">Phelipaea arenaria</emphasis> +</taxonomicName> +[Borkh.] Walpers) +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="35C05B614BA4CBF511750E9A90747CD9" pageId="null" pageNumber="253" type="vernacular_names"> +<paragraph id="DA2A67788DD606A6AD15D13E72B6D066" pageId="null" pageNumber="253">Sand-Sommerwurz</paragraph> +</subSubSection> + + + +Stengel 15-45 cm hoch, +blassgelb +bis +blasslila +. Tragblatt +1/2 +-⅔ so lang wie die +Bluete +, am Grunde 4-6 mm breit. Zwischen Kelch und Tragblatt 2 schmal lanzettliche +Vorblaetter +vorhanden, die +kuerzer +sind als der Kelch. Kelch wie bei + +O. ramosa + +(Nr. 1). Krone 22-35 mm lang, +ueber +dem Fruchtknoten verengert (2-4 mm im Durchmesser), kurz vor dem Rand wenig gebogen, mit hellen +Druesenhaaren +, +blauviolett +, am Grunde +weiss +; + +Zipfel der Unterlippe fast +halbkreisfoermig + +, etwa gleich +gross +. +Staubfaeden +3-5 mm +ueber +dem Grunde der Krone +eingefuegt +, unten meist mit +druesenlosen +Haaren; +Staubbeutel dicht behaart +(bei allen andern Arten kahl oder mit wenigen Haaren). Narbe +weiss +bis lila. - +Bluete +: Sommer. + + +Zytologische Angaben. +Keine Untersuchungen. + + +Standort. +Kollin und montan. Trockene, lockere, +naehrstoffarme +, sandige +Boeden +. Felssteppen, Trockenwiesen. - Auf + +Artemisia campestris +. + + + +Verbreitung. Mediterrane Pflanze: +Nordwaerts +vereinzelt bis Nordfrankreich, Norddeutschland, Nordpolen; ost- und +suedwaerts +bis +Mittelrussland +, Kaukasus, Kleinasien, Nordafrika. - Im Gebiet: Oberrheinische Tiefebene (wahrscheinlich nur +ausserhalb +des Gebiets), Genferseegebiet, Savoyen, Wallis, Aostatal, Veltlin, Puschlav, +Muenstertal +und Vintschgau, Unterengadin, Oberinntal; ziemlich selten. + + +Bemerkungen. +Ob sich + +O. arenaria + +spezifisch von + +O. purpurea + +(Nr. 2) unterscheidet, +muss +experimentell untersucht werden. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B1/2D/37B12D775133582AB53A266424D9D76E.xml b/data/37/B1/2D/37B12D775133582AB53A266424D9D76E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7ef9e254792 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B1/2D/37B12D775133582AB53A266424D9D76E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ + + + +Phylogeny and classification of Endromidae (Lepidoptera: Bombycoidea) based on mitochondrial genomes + + + +Author + +Deng, Min +Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology and Control of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, China & College of Science, Qiongtai Normal University, Haikou, Hainan 571100, China + + + +Author + +Zwick, Andreas +CSIRO, Australian National Insect Collection, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia + + + +Author + +Chen, Qi +Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology and Control of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, China + + + +Author + +Liao, Cheng-Qing +Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology and Control of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, China + + + +Author + +Wang, Wei +College of Science, Qiongtai Normal University, Haikou, Hainan 571100, China + + + +Author + +Wang, Xing +College of Science, Qiongtai Normal University, Haikou, Hainan 571100, China +xingwanghjt@163.com + + + +Author + +Huang, Guo-Hua +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6841-0095 +Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology and Control of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, China +ghhuang@hunau.edu.cn + +text + + +Arthropod Systematics & amp; Phylogeny + + +2023 + +2023-04-20 + + +81 + + +395 +408 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.81.e90721 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.81.e90721 +1864-8312-81-395 +DD4168D0C9B7416C91FDDAE2E0E2E6CF +435EAC3525865656B699DDD750519255 + + + + +Andracini tribe nov. + + + +Type genus. + + +Andraca + +Walker, 1865 + + + +Diagnosis. + +Morphological synapomorphies supporting the monophyly of +Andracini +tribe nov. +are the relatively broad forewings, the very long labial palpi (longer than the vertical diameter of the compound eye), and underdeveloped rami over the distal 1/3 of the antenna (Figure +2 +). The larvae of this tribe share non-expanded thoracic tergites, a very short or completely absent anal horn, and the body in most species is densely covered with short hairs (Figure +1 +: + +Andraca + +). + + + +Notes. + + +Pseudandraca + +was established by +Miyata (1970) +with the type species + +Andraca gracilis + +Butler, 1885 based on a boot-shaped sacculus in the male genitalia. +Wang et al. (2015) +added + +Andraca flavamaculata + +Yang, 1995. Our molecular results also support these two genera as sister taxa. + +Andraca + +had been considered to have two subgenera ( +Zolotuhin 2012 +), but our analyses recover the subgenus +Andraca Chrypathemola +syn. nov. +as a synonym of + +Andraca + +. The species + +Pseudandraca gongshanensis + +comb. nov. +has a complex wing pattern, a relatively straight phallus and a foot-shaped apex of the valva, which are all characteristics shared with + +Pseudandraca + +(Figure +3 +). + + + +Figure 3. + +Pseudandraca + +adult and male genitalia. +A +, +B + +Pseudandraca flavamaculata + +; +C +, +D + +P. gongshanensis + +comb. nov. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B1/60/37B160AF2A1559EE826A289B7BD21B30.xml b/data/37/B1/60/37B160AF2A1559EE826A289B7BD21B30.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6b608fb6f87 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B1/60/37B160AF2A1559EE826A289B7BD21B30.xml @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + +Checklist of digeneans (Platyhelminthes, Trematoda, Digenea) of Georgia + + + +Author + +Arabuli, Lela +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9921-6343 +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia +lela.arabuli.1@iliauni.edu.ge + + + +Author + +Murvanidze, Lali +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia + + + +Author + +Faltynkova, Anna +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-5881 +Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic + + + +Author + +Mumladze, Levan +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-6973 +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2024 + +2024-01-08 + + +12 + + +110201 +110201 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e110201 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e110201 +1314-2828-12-e110201 +2E017986F1F55AB49BD4F0A41AB76F82 + + + + +Notocotylus noyeri Joyeux, 1922 + + + +Parasite of + +mammals - +Cricetidae +: + +Arvicola terrestris + +. + + +Site of infection +: small intestine. + + + +Distribution + +Occurrence in Europe; +in Georgia +: EG: Gori - Khidistavi reported by +Matsabaridze (1976) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B1/7B/37B17B2E5787DE66E1F426AB47F7ABCE.xml b/data/37/B1/7B/37B17B2E5787DE66E1F426AB47F7ABCE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..85edacddc5b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B1/7B/37B17B2E5787DE66E1F426AB47F7ABCE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Agrostemma flos-jovis +, +spec. nov. + + + +4. Agrostemma tomentosa, petalis emarginatis. + +Lychnis coronaria sylvestris. +Bauh. pin. 204. +Moris. hist. 2. p.540. s.5. t.36. f.2. + + +Lychnis umbellifera montana helvetica. +Zan. hist. 128. t. 51. +Raj. hist. 993. + + + + +Habitat in +Helvetia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B1/8C/37B18C64E6ED369021B7FE997BB5465A.xml b/data/37/B1/8C/37B18C64E6ED369021B7FE997BB5465A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..93406b46b4f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B1/8C/37B18C64E6ED369021B7FE997BB5465A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ + + + +Radiation of members of the Soroseris hookeriana complex (Asteraceae) on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and their proposed taxonomic treatment + + + +Author + +Heng, La-Mei + + + +Author + +Zheng, Yu-Lin + + + +Author + +Zhao, Yong-Bao + + + +Author + +Wang, Yu-Jin + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2018 + +114 + + +11 +25 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.114.29914 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.114.29914 +1314-2003-114-11 +7651FFFAFFFB6A2CFFF8B56CFFF0763F +2527970 + + + + +Soroseris hookeriana subsp. occidentalis (Stebbins) Yu.J. Wang & L.M. Heng +comb. nov. + + + + +≡ +Soroseris gillii subsp. occidentalis +Stebbins in Mem. Torrey Bot. Club. 19 (3): 44. 1940 (Type: K000250154); Babcock in Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 22: 922. 1937; S. Y. Hu in Quart. Journ. Taiwan Mus. 21 (3-4): 166. 1968; ≡ +Soroseris occidentalis +(Stebbins) Tzvelev in Bot. Zhurn. 92: 1753. 2007. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B1/B1/37B1B17CDACB60A4E821EBA1E1645A55.xml b/data/37/B1/B1/37B1B17CDACB60A4E821EBA1E1645A55.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8c10de5bd31 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B1/B1/37B1B17CDACB60A4E821EBA1E1645A55.xml @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828--8013 + + + + +Eurytoma pollux Claridge, 1959 + + + +Distribution +England + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B1/C0/37B1C0B38A58BB3E7A7C176312D42002.xml b/data/37/B1/C0/37B1C0B38A58BB3E7A7C176312D42002.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..41211c654c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B1/C0/37B1C0B38A58BB3E7A7C176312D42002.xml @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Plectiscus impurator Gravenhorst, 1829 + + + + +ventralis +(Holmgren, 1858, +Orthocentrus +) + + +vittatus +(Holmgren, 1858, +Orthocentrus +) + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B3/42/37B342CF0F2B592EA8AAE9E811A983D1.xml b/data/37/B3/42/37B342CF0F2B592EA8AAE9E811A983D1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..02771a895d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B3/42/37B342CF0F2B592EA8AAE9E811A983D1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +New records of Provanna (Gastropoda, Provannidae) from the Costa Rica Margin and an identification key for the genus + + + +Author + +Betters, Melissa J. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8975-257X +Department of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA +melissajbetters@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Cordes, Erik E. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6989-2348 +Department of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2024 + +2024-01-12 + + +1189 + + +1 +32 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1189.109734 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1189.109734 +1313-2970-1189-1 +C2269924E29A4D668FA96A21E34330D4 +408045565E2857AA9C592F0555D5D539 + + + + + +Provanna pacifica +Waren +& Bouchet, 1986 + + + + +New records. + +Costa Rica • 3 specimens; Costa Rica Margin, Quepos Seep; +9.031°N +, +84.619°W +; 1413 m; 7 June 2017; Lisa Levin, Kris Krasnosky leg.; ALVIN Dive 4924, from mussels; SBIC M16204. 6 specimens; Costa Rica Margin, Mound 11; +8.922°N +, +84.305°W +; 1017 m; 3 November 2018; Victoria Orphan, Hang Yu leg.; ALVIN Dive 4988, on wood; SBIC 16955. + + + +Remarks. + +The range of + +P. pacifica + +is here expanded to one hydrocarbon seep (Quepos Seep) and one organic fall at the CRM (Mound 11). Their occurrence here on Bathymodiolin mussels represents the first time they have been observed as, potentially, permanent denizens of a hydrocarbon seep environment. Their distribution now includes the Oregon Margin, the Costa Rica Margin, and the Gulf of Panama between 1017-2750 m depth (Table +4 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B3/6C/37B36C1C46C4A4E2598801B9C563AEE8.xml b/data/37/B3/6C/37B36C1C46C4A4E2598801B9C563AEE8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9526a007fff --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B3/6C/37B36C1C46C4A4E2598801B9C563AEE8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Pheidole in the New World. A dominant, hyperdiverse ant genus. + + + +Author + +Wilson, E. O. + +text + +2003 +Harvard University Press + +Cambridge, MA + + + +http://atbi.biosci.ohio-state.edu/HymOnline/reference-full.html?id=20017 + +book +20017 + + + + +Pheidole christopherseni +Forel + + + + +Pheidole christopherseni +Forel 1912g: 229. + + + +Types Mus. Hist. Nat. Geneve. + + +Etymology Eponymous. + + + +Diagnosis One of the most distinctive of all +Pheidole +species, marked by extremely small size, greatly elongated head of the major, and almost complete lack of carinulae anywhere on the bodies of major and minor, even around the antennal fossae and on the metapleural gland bulla. In some series at least, majors have faint longitudinal carinulae on the frontal lobes, and both castes have a few such traces on sides of the head anterior to the eyes. + + + +Measurements (mm) Syntype major: HW 0.34, HL 0.40, SL 0.34, EL 0.06, PW 0.24. Minor not measured. +Color Major: concolorous medium yellow. Minor: concolorous pale yellow. + + + +range In addition to the type locality (Panama), Longino (1997) has recorded +christopherseni +from the Atlantic lowlands of Costa Rica and the +Tayrona +National Park of Colombia. + + + + +Biology In Costa Rica, +christopherseni +has been found in rainforest to 600 m, and in Colombia once in seasonal dry forest. This bizarre little species is strictly arboreal so far as is known. The type colony was nesting in a "very thin hollow stem" (Forel). Longino (1997) reports colonies from Costa Rica in the live, hollow stems of Bauhinia vines (a legume), as well as in a bignoniaceous liana, a small tree, and Cecropia saplings. + + + +Figure Upper: syntype, major. Lower: syntype, minor. PANAMA. Scale bars = 1 mm. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B3/7C/37B37C9E0CA721B1FF1B2590377D82D0.xml b/data/37/B3/7C/37B37C9E0CA721B1FF1B2590377D82D0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9ecd698cab1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B3/7C/37B37C9E0CA721B1FF1B2590377D82D0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,309 @@ + + + +Odontamblyopus rebecca, a new species of amblyopine goby from Vietnam with a key to known species of the genus (Gobiidae: Amblyopinae). + + + +Author + +Edward O. Murdy + + + +Author + +Koichi Shibukawa + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2003 + +138 + + +1 +6 + + + + +http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:215F5561-93F2-4E75-AFF1-3F8817CCD88F + +journal article +z00138p001 +215F5561-93F2-4E75-AFF1-3F8817CCD88F + + + + +Odontamblyopus rebecca +sp. nov. + + + +(Fig.1; Tables 1-2) + + + + +Holotype +: + +ROM +72279 + +, 141.0 mm SL, male. + + + + +Paratypes +: + +AMS +I.41549-001 + +, 2: 110.8-125.6 mm SL; + +MNHN +2002-3010 + +, 1:78.5, + +MNHN +2002-3011 + +, 1:89.0, + +MNHN +2002-3012 + +, 1: 92.0 mm SL; + +ROM +72625 + +, 2:96.1- 136.8 mm SL; + +ROM +72626 + +, 26:75.1-132.6 mm SL; + +USNM +369736 + +, 3:113.1-137.8 mm SL. + + + +All material was collected on +29 February 2000 +by +Richard Winterbottom +from +a fish market located on the east side of Haiphong City +, +Vietnam +( +20º52' N +, +106º41' E +). + + + + +Diagnosis. +Odontamblyopus rebecca +can be diagnosed from congeners by the following combination of characters: total dorsal-fin elements 44-48 (mean 45.8), anal-fin elements37-42 (mean 38.5), pectoral fin with 40-51 rays (mean 45.8), and caudal vertebrae 20-21 (mean 20.1). A brownish streak courses from the dorsal surface of the head along dorsum to the caudal fin; chin blackish; caudal fin blackish. + + + +Description. Counts of holotype given first, followed by those of paratypes in parentheses. D VI (VI), 40 (38-42), first non-spinous dorsal-fin ray segmented and branched; spinous dorsal-fin pterygiophore formula 3-12210 (holotype and all paratypes); dorsal fin connected by membrane to the caudal fin. Anal-fin rays 38 (37-42), first element of anal fin segmented but not branched. Anal fin connected by membrane to caudal fin. Pectoralfin rays 45/45 (40-51), all pectoral-fin rays segmented, occasionally one or more ventralmost rays branched, all others unbranched; for distal half of fin, membranous connection lacking so that rays are free and silk-like. Pelvic-fin rays I, 5; frenum present; interradial membrane uniting fins present throughout length of innermost rays. Caudal fin with 17 (17) segmented rays including 8+7 (8+7) branched rays and a dorsal and ventral simple ray. +Scales cycloid, embedded, non-imbricated, and difficult to discern without magnification; present on body and head, largest posteriorly. Head scales most abundant on dorsum with some scales on cheeks and a few on operculum. Two lateral rows of teeth in each jaw, more than two rows anteriorly; outer-row teeth much larger and more pointed than those of inner rows; lower-jaw teeth longer than upper-jaw teeth; 19 (7-20) fang-like teeth in outer row of upper jaw, typically interlocking with those of lower jaw; numerous conical teeth on inner rows of upper jaw; 9 (6-10) fang-like teeth in outer row of lower jaw; numerous conical teeth in inner rows of lower jaw. Two (occasionally only one) stout caninoid teeth internal to symphysis of lower jaw. No palatine or vomerine teeth present. +Precaudal vertebrae 10 (10), caudal vertebrae 20 (20-21). +Coloration. Head and body tannish brown. Chin with diffuse blackish blotch. Dorsal surface of head dusky brown as is dorsal-fin base almost to the caudal peduncle. From midpoint of caudal fin posteriad, blackish. Other fins translucent. + + + +Distribution. Known only from a single locality, a fish market located on the east side of Haiphong City, Vietnam. The collector of these specimens, Dr. Richard Winterbottom, assumes the specimens were obtained along the Gulf of Tonkin coast, which is near the market, or in a nearby estuarine environment. +Nguyen +(1991) reported an unidentified species of +Odontamblyopus +from coastal provinces in northern Vietnam and stated that the species possessed: VI, 39-42 dorsal-fin rays; 37-41 anal-fin rays; 43-50 pectoral-fin rays; 10+19 (18-20) vertebrae. With the exception of the caudal vertebral count, we believe that +Nguyen's +description is a match with the subject specimens. (As we do not know +Nguyen's +methodology for counting vertebrae, we cannot be sure that our counting methods are the same.) Unfortunately, attempts to contact Mr. +Nguyen +were unsuccessful so his specimens were not available to us. + + + +Etymology. This species is named for Rebecca Rootes, the life partner and spouse of the first author. + + + +Comparisons with congeners. The following data and information pertaining to +Odontamblyopus +, excepting the new species described herein, were taken from Murdy and Shibukawa (2001) unless otherwise cited. With respect to +O. rebecca +, +O. roseus +differs in having a chocolate-brown distal margin on the median fins (vs. translucent in +O. rebecca +); more caudal vertebrae (22 in +O. roseus +vs. typically 20 in +O. rebecca +) and in having a longer pelvic fin (pelvic-fin length/SL 0.124-0.151, mean = 0.141, in +O. roseus +vs. 0.074- 0.126, mean = 0.107, in +O. rebecca +). In comparison to +O. rubicundus +, +O. rebecca +has more caudal vertebrae (20-21 in +O. rebecca +vs. 17 in +O. rubicundus +); a longer pectoral fin with respect to head length (pectoral-fin length/head length 0.673-1.050, mean = 0.852, in +O. rebecca +vs. 0.628-0.965, mean = 0.719, in +O. rubicundus +); and fewer anal-fin pterygiophores anterior to the first hemal spine (typically 2 in +O. rebecca +vs. 3 in +O. rubicundus +). Whereas there is considerable overlap in most meristic values between +O. rebecca +and +O. lacepedii +, a significant difference exists in the number of pectoral-fin rays (40-51, mean = 45.8, in +O. rebecca +vs. 24-33, mean = 27.9, in +O. lacepedii +). Several morphometric measures also serve to distinguish +O. rebecca +from +O. lacepedii +: SL/TL (range 0.761-0.829, mean = 0.788, in +O. rebecca +vs. 0.808-0.850, mean = 0.825, in +O. lacepedii +); pelvic-fin length/head length (range 0.508-0.842, mean = 0.703, in +O. rebecca +vs. 0.665-1.08, mean = 0.810, in +O. lacepedii +); and pectoral-fin length/SL (range 0.093-0.154, mean = 0.130, in +O. rebecca +vs. 0.082-0.132, mean = 0.101, in +O. lacepedii +). + + + + +Within the genus +Odontamblyopus +, only +O. tenuis +and +O. rebecca +have pectoral-fin ray counts greater than 39; the average pectoral-fin ray count for +O. tenuis +is 59.5 (range = 46-65) whereas for +O. rebecca +it is 45.8 (range = 40-51). (No other species of +Odontamblyopus +has more than 33 pectoral-fin rays.) We hypothesize that the shared possession of high numbers of pectoral-fin rays connotes a greater degree of relatedness between these two species than with species that do not possess this feature. + + +In contrast with +O. rebecca +, +O. tenuis +has barbels on the underside of the chin ( +O. rebecca +has none). +O. tenuis +typically has fewer elements in both the dorsal and anal fins than does +O. rebecca +(range of dorsal-fin elements 40-42, mean = 40.4, in +O. tenuis +vs. range of 44-48, mean = 45.8, in +O. rebecca +; range of anal-fin elements 32-35, mean = 33.2, in +O. tenuis +vs. range of 37-42, mean = 38.5, in +O. rebecca +). +O. tenuis +and +O. rebecca +differ in vertebral numbers; +O. tenuis +has 17 caudal vertebrae whereas +O. rebecca +typically has 20. Epineurals are present from 1st precaudal vertebra to the 5th caudal vertebra in +O. tenuis +, and 1st precaudal vertebra to the 4th, 5th, 6th, or 7th caudal vertebra in +O. rebecca +. + + +The following morphometric measures also show differences between the two species: head length/SL (range of 0.078-0.130, mean = 0.114, in +O. tenuis +vs. 0.130-0.179, mean = 0.152, in +O. rebecca +); head width/SL (0.040-0.059, mean = 0.054, in +O. tenuis +vs. 0.062- 0.110, mean = 0.083, in +O. rebecca +); and pectoral-fin length/SL (0.084-0.119, mean = 0.102, in +O. tenuis +vs. 0.093-0.154, mean = 0.130, in +O. rebecca +). + + + + +Key to the species of +Odontamblyopus + +(modified from Murdy and Shibukawa, 2001) +1a. Pectoral-fin rays 40 or more .......................................................................................... 2 +1b. Pectoral-fin rays 33 or fewer ......................................................................................... 3 + +2a. Chin with numerous small barbels; pectoral-fin rays 46-65; total dorsal-fin elements 40-42; anal-fin elements 32-35; 17 caudal vertebrae. (Pakistan, Myanmar) .... +O. tenuis + + +2b. Chin lacking barbels; pectoral-fin rays 40-51; total dorsal-fin elements 44-48; anal-fin elements 37-42; 20-21 caudal vertebrae. (Vietnam) ........................ +O. rebecca +sp. nov. + + +3a. In preservative, distal margins of dorsal and anal fins tinged chocolate-brown; dorsal surface of skull bony lacking portions of adductor mandibulae muscle; epineurals present from 1st precaudal vertebra to 10th caudal vertebra. (west coast of India) .......... .......................................................................................................................... +O. roseus + +3b. In preservative, distal margins of dorsal and anal fins the same color as rest of fin but not chocolate-brown; dorsal surface of skull covered by adductor mandibulae muscle; epineurals present from 1st precaudal vertebra to 3rd, 4th, or 5th caudal vertebra ............ 4 + +4a. Caudal fin very long, standard length typically less than 80% of total length; total dorsal-fin elements 40-47; anal-fin elements 33-40; caudal vertebrae 17; 3 anal-fin pterygiophores preceding first hemal spine. (east coast of India, Bangladesh, Myanmar) .... .................................................................................................................. +O. rubicundus + + +4b. Caudal fin long, standard length more than 80% of total length; total dorsal-fin elements44-54; anal-fin elements 36-45; caudal vertebrae 20-24; 2 (rarely 3) anal-fin pterygiophores preceding first hemal spine. (China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan) ...................................................................................................................... +O. lacepedii + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B3/7E/37B37E1D3A1C9435E6694B50DFBE4AD1.xml b/data/37/B3/7E/37B37E1D3A1C9435E6694B50DFBE4AD1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..50fa3a3fabb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B3/7E/37B37E1D3A1C9435E6694B50DFBE4AD1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ + + + +Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 2. Nymphaceae bis Primulaceae (2 nd edition) (p. 956): Rosaceae + + + +Author + +Hess, Hans Ernst + + + +Author + +Landolt, Elias + + + +Author + +Hirzel, Rosmarie + +text + +1976 +Birkhaeuser Verlag + + +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.292251 + +book +292251 +10.5281/zenodo.292251 +3-7643-0527-4 + + + + +<subSubSection id="850079351FCDE816257127646595D26D" pageId="null" pageNumber="454" type="nomenclature"> +<paragraph id="262D58D8B00B7034FEAD2617F8BDF595" pageId="null" pageNumber="454"> +<pageBreakToken id="9F35D3488349A54953E377B406215647" pageId="null" pageNumber="454" start="start">Rosa</pageBreakToken> +<normalizedToken id="876FB84195C6BA8842B17A1B51B04968" originalValue="omíssa" pageId="null" pageNumber="454">omissa</normalizedToken> +<normalizedToken id="CDCF467E1B541B543A6B27E30AF3B36E" originalValue="Déseglise" pageId="null" pageNumber="454">Deseglise</normalizedToken> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="8DFCE5ACE77E6324689E6436B8EEE382" pageId="null" pageNumber="454" type="vernacular_names"> +<paragraph id="39B26E1E0B93F498A85586D7A8AD54F5" pageId="null" pageNumber="454"> +<normalizedToken id="CD0F80A13A667DF82B492ECB6FCE1641" originalValue="Übersehene" pageId="null" pageNumber="454">Uebersehene</normalizedToken> +Rose +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> + + + + + +Stacheln wenig gebogen, nie +sichelfoermig +gekruemmt + +, selten einzelne Stacheln gerade. + +Blaetter +meist auf der ganzen Unterseite mit +Stieldruesen +. Fruchtstiel +hoechstens +so lang wie die Frucht. +Kelchblaetter +kuerzer +als die +Kronblaetter +, nach der +Bluete +aufrecht, bis zur Fruchtreife bleibend. + +Griffel gelegentlich kahl. + + +Zytologische Angaben. 2n += +28: +Material aus botanischen +Gaerten +; 14 univalente und 14 bivalente Chromosomen (Hurst 1928, Harrison aus Tischler 1950). +2n += +35: +Material aus botanischen +Gaerten +; 21 univalente und 14 bivalente Chromosomen (Blackburn und Harrison 1921, Harrison aus Tischler 1950). +2n += +42: +Material aus botanischen +Gaerten +; 28 univalente und 14 bivalente Chromosomen (aus Tischler 1950). + + +Standort. +Kollin und montan. +Flachgruendige +, kalkhaltige +Boeden +. Auf Felsgesimsen und im + +Prunus +spinosa- + +Gebuesch +. + + + +Verbreitung. +Europaeische +Pflanze: + +Nordwaerts +bis Irland, Skandinavien (69° NB), Finnland; +ostwaerts +bis Litauen und Polen; +Suedgrenze +durch +Pyrenaeen +, Alpen, Apennin, Gebirge der Balkanhalbinsel, Kleinasien, Iran. - Im Westen des Gebiets verbreitet: Savoyen, +Waadtlaender +und Freiburger Alpen, Wallis (?), +suedwestlicher +Jura, +Huegelgebiet +an der Oberrheinischen Tiefebene. + + +Bemerkungen. +Neuerdings wird auch der Name + +R. Sherardii +Davies + +verwendet. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B3/F4/37B3F4857C9A539283C71076ECBCD18B.xml b/data/37/B3/F4/37B3F4857C9A539283C71076ECBCD18B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..98d0469859a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B3/F4/37B3F4857C9A539283C71076ECBCD18B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ + + + +A conspectus of Australian Apotropina (Diptera, Chloropidae) with the description of two new species + + + +Author + +Ang, Yuchen +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5889-018X +Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, 2 Conservatory Dr., 117377 Singapore, Singapore +nhmay@nus.edu.sg + + + +Author + +Lumbers, James +https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4895-0936 +Australian National Insect Collection (ANIC), CSIRO Black Mountain, 1 Clunies Ross St, Acton Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia & Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia + + + +Author + +Riccardi, Paula R. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4850-7524 +Center for Integrative Biodiversity Discovery, Museum fuer Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstr. 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany +paularriccardi@gmail.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2023 + +2023-12-21 + + +1187 + + +261 +299 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1187.108497 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1187.108497 +1313-2970-1187-261 +919C320FAA724F1D90281ECB12948B8D +E72AB439483E596BAE418C77FC8B90AF + + + + +Apotropina proxima (Rayment, 1959) + + + + +Fig. 25E, F + + + + +Ephydroscinis proxima +Rayment, 1959: 332. + + + +Type locality and distribution. +Australia: Victoria (Mt. Richmond Reserve). + + +Taxonomic notes. + + +Apotropina proxima + +likely belongs to a group of described species (including + +A. exquisita + +, + +A. ornatipennis + +and + +A. raymenti + +) that have dark bodies with shiny tomentosity, wings with distinct dark patterning covering at least the medial region from costal margin to beyond R2+3 vein. Based on the species description, + +A. proxima + +can be distinguished from other species in this group with its long geniculate proboscis, having only two distal tarsal segments dark and scutum with a silvery-green metallic pattern divided by three longitudinal black lines. The description did not indicate any deposited type material for examination, but did provide drawings which depict the fly with brown macula at the radial sector, a long, geniculate proboscis (Fig. +25E +) and three longitudinal black strips along the scutum (Fig. +25F +). However, the illustration does not reflect any "basally angulated fore tibiae" as indicated in the description, and as such the authors have opted to exclude this ambiguous character from the key. This species was described with life history information - as a likely hyperparasitoid associated with two other predatory/parasitoid species + +Sericophorus chalybeus + +(F. Smith, 1851) (syn. + +S. victoriensis + +Rayment) and + +Acanthostethus portlandensis + +(Rayment, 1953) ( +Rayment 1959 +). Original description in Suppl. material 1, which only reflects the only chaetotaxy as possessing four dorsocentral setae. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B4/04/37B404FD800298C58E9E3E7388C17B4C.xml b/data/37/B4/04/37B404FD800298C58E9E3E7388C17B4C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..520c67bd447 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B4/04/37B404FD800298C58E9E3E7388C17B4C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part P) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +718 +782 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Phytolacca octandra +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +, ed. 2, 1 + +: 631. 1762 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Mexico." RCN: 3418. + + + + +Lectotype +(Nowicke in +Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard +. 55: 313. 1969): Herb. Linn. No. 607.1 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + +Phytolacca octandra +L. + +( +Phytolaccaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B4/20/37B420B139B06E7138B3C756433E062D.xml b/data/37/B4/20/37B420B139B06E7138B3C756433E062D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..22a5a9d7921 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B4/20/37B420B139B06E7138B3C756433E062D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Sternarchorhynchus curumim (Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae), a new species of tube-snouted ghost electric knifefish from the lowland Amazon basin, Brazil. + + + +Author + +Carlos David de Santana + + + +Author + +William G. R. Crampton + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2006 + +1166 + + +57 +68 + + + + +http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9F94D386-15AE-424A-88C9-4169AB93DB60 + +journal article +z01166p057 + + + + +Sternarchorhynchus mesensis +. + + + + + +Brazil +: +Goias +: +MNRJ +11611, +paratypes +4 c&s, Rio Tocantins, local of the future hydroelectric dam Serra da Mesa, +Minacu +, Cavalcante, +13°50’S +48°19’W +, D. F. Moraes et al., 24- +31 Jul 1988 +. + + +MNRJ +11613, +paratypes +7, 115- 250, Rio Tocantins, local of the future hydroelectric dam Serra da Mesa, +Minacu +, Cavalcante, +13°50’S +48°19’W +, D. F. Moraes et al., 24- +31 Jul 1988 +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B4/BE/37B4BE375A2751E9AF508CF27D0C6CFE.xml b/data/37/B4/BE/37B4BE375A2751E9AF508CF27D0C6CFE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1784116ef48 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B4/BE/37B4BE375A2751E9AF508CF27D0C6CFE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,719 @@ + + + +Filling distribution gaps: Two new species of the catfish genus Cambeva from southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest (Siluriformes, Trichomycteridae) + + + +Author + +Costa, Wilson J. E. M. +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + + + +Author + +Feltrin, Caio R. M. +Av. Municipal, 45, Sideropolis, CEP 88860 - 000, Santa Catarina, Brazil + + + +Author + +Katz, Axel M. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2933-7163 +Laboratory of Systematics and Evolution of Teleost Fishes, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68049, CEP 21941 - 971, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil + +text + + +Zoosystematics and Evolution + + +2021 + +2021-03-02 + + +97 + + +1 + + +147 +159 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.61006 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.97.61006 +1860-0743-1-147 +FCED0DBF90AA4299B3C38B208971EBA6 +AE4A6CE3160D55B387950389A110F91F + + + + +Cambeva barbosae +sp. nov. +Figs 1 +, 2 +, 3A-E +, 4A-C +, +Table 1 + + + +Holotype. + +UFRJ 10000, 67.6 mm SL; Brazil: Santa Catarina state: +Aguas +Mornas municipality: Rio +Cubatao +do Sul basin, +27°39'51"S +, +48°51'26"W +, about 130 m asl; A.M. Katz, F.R. Pereira & M.A. Barbosa, 31 May 2013. + + + +Paratypes. + +All from Brazil: Santa Catarina state. Rio +Cubatao +do Sul: UFRJ 9503, 10, 44.1-71.6 mm SL; UFRJ 9848, 5, 34.1-41.7 mm SL (C&S); collected with holotype. Rio Maruim basin: - UFRJ 9505, 13.3-73.1 mm SL; +27°40'39"S +, +48°50'53"W +, about 90 m asl; same collectors and date as holotype. - UFRJ 12629, 6, 38.7-62.0 mm SL; stream tributary to Rio Forquilhas, +Colonia +Santana, +Sao +Jose +municipality, +27°32'44"S +, +48°42'21"W +, about 40 m asl; C.R.M. Feltrin, 15 Nov. 2019. - UFRJ 6924, 10, 31.9-57.6 mm SL; small stream tributary to upper Rio Forquilhas, village of Alto Forquilhas, +Sao +Jose +municipality, +27°32'44"S +, +48°42'21"W +, about 40 m asl; C.R.M. Feltrin, 17 Jun. 2020. Rio +Cubatao +do Sul basin: UFRJ 6925, 25, 24.8-62.1 mm SL; unnamed stream, +Aguas +Mornas municipality, +27°43'16"S +, +48°53'23"W +, about 190 m asl; C.R.M. Feltrin, 13 Jun. 2020. Rio +Biguacu +basin, +Biguacu +municipality: UFRJ 11717, 11, 31.6-67.9 mm SL; UFRJ 6921, 3 (C&S), 51.1-58.9 mm SL; Cachoeira Graciosa, +27°26'37"S +, +48°40'59"W +, about 60 m asl; C.R.M. Feltrin, Aug. 2017. - UFRJ 11872, 2, 54.1-54.9 mm SL; same locality and collector as UFRJ 11717, 27 Nov. 2018. - CICCAA 02617, 2, 53.5-62.3 mm SL; Riacho Canudos, +27°24'30"S +, +48°45'17"W +, about 70 m asl; C.R.M. Feltrin, 4 Dec. 2017. + + + +Figure 1. + +Cambeva barbosae + +sp. nov., UFRJ 10000, holotype, 67.6 mm SL: +A. +left lateral view; +B. +dorsal view; +C. +ventral view. + + + + +Figure 2. +Head of + +Cambeva barbosae + +sp. nov., UFRJ 10000, holotype, 67.6 mm SL: +A +, left lateral view +B. +dorsal view; C, ventral view. Pores of the cephalic latero-sensory system are indicated in A and B. + + + + +Table 1. +Morphometric data of + +Cambeva barbosae + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
-HolotypeParatypes (n = 12)
+Standard length (mm) +67.644.3-71.6
+Percent of standard length +
Body depth14.013.9-18.7
Caudal peduncle depth12.011.3-13.0
Body width10.210.2-14.1
Caudal peduncle width3.12.9-4.7
Pre-dorsal length60.261.5-66.6
Pre-pelvic length54.554.9-61.6
Dorsal-fin base length11.710.8-13.8
Anal-fin base length7.77.7-9.1
Caudal-fin length17.314.4-18.5
Pectoral-fin length14.912.1-15.1
Pelvic-fin length10.38.7-11.2
Head length20.419.7-22.8
+Percent of head length +
Head depth45.446.6-54.4
Head width81.379.0-89.9
Snout length40.141.2-45.5
Interorbital length20.720.5-25.9
Preorbital length15.313.6-16.7
Eye diameter12.810.8-13.8
+ + + +Additional material + +(non-types). + + +Rio +Biguacu + +basin, + +Biguacu + +municipality: UFRJ 12383, 4; UFRJ 12385, 11; +Riacho Canudos +, +27°25'20"S +, +48°45'13"W +, about + +30 m +asl + +; +B. Mesquita +& +P.F. Amorim +, +16 Aug. 2019 + +. + + +Florianopolis + +municipality: UFRJ 10603, 10; UFRJ 10669, 2 (C&S); + +Corrego +Grande + +, +Ilha de Santa Catarina +, +27°36'10"S +, +48°30'12"W +, about + +15 m +asl + +; +A.M. Katz +, +F. Pereira +& +P.F. Amorim +, +11 Jun. 2015 + +. + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Cambeva barbosae + +differs from all congeners, except + +C. castroi + +(de +Pinna +, 1992), + +C. concolor + +(Costa, 1992), + +C. crassicaudata + +(Wosiacki & de +Pinna +2008), + +C. diabola + +(Bockmann, Casatti & de +Pinna +, 2004), + +C. guaraquessaba + +(Wosiacki, 2005), + +C. igobi + +(Wosiacki & de +Pinna +, 2008), + +C. iheringi + +(Eigenmann, 1917), + +C. tupinamba + +(Wosiacki & Oyakawa, 2005), + +C. variegata + +(Costa, 1992), + +C. ytororo + +Teran +, Ferrer, Benitez, Alonso, Aguilera & Mirande, 2017, and + +C. zonata + +(Eigenmann, 1918) by having eight pectoral-fin rays (vs. five to seven in all other species). + +Cambeva barbosae + +differs from all these species by the following combination of diagnostic features: nine principal dorsal-fin rays (vs. 12-13 in + +C. concolor + +, + +C. iheringi + +and + +C. variegata + +); 19-23 dorsal procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. 15-16 in + +C. guarequessaba + +and + +C. tupinamba + +; 24-29 in + +C. crassicaudata + +and + +C. igobi + +; and 31-35 in + +C. ytororo + +); 8-12 ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. 17-19 in + +C. crassicaudata + +); 36-38 vertebrae (vs. 34-35 in + +C. concolor + +, + +C. iheringi + +and + +C. variegata + +); all jaw teeth incisiform (vs. conical in + +C. castroi + +and + +C. diabola + +, anterior teeth sub-incisiform, posterior teeth conical in + +C. zonata + +); and absence of a dark grey to black bar on the posterior portion of the caudal fin, contrasting with a white to pale yellow zone on the anterior portion of the fin (vs. presence in + +C. castroi + +and + +C. diabola + +). Also distinguished from + +C. concolor + +, + +C. crassicaudata + +, + +C. igobi + +, and + +C. variegata + +by having a distinctive process on the dorsal margin of the quadrate, just posterior to the cartilage block joining quadrate and metapterygoid (Fig. +4B +; vs. absence), and from + +C. castroi + +, + +C. concolor + +, + +C. crassicaudata + +, + +C. diabola + +, + +C. igobi + +, + +C. variegata + +(Costa, 1992), and + +C. zonata + +by the presence of a distinctive, anteriorly directed process on the lateral margin of the lateral ethmoid (Fig. +4A +; vs. absence) and a deep notch between the lateral shell on the opercular articular facet for the hyomandibula and the opercular articular facet for the preopercle in larger specimens (above about 50 mm SL, Fig. +4B +; vs. absence). + + + +Figure 3. +Live specimens (not preserved) of: +A-E. + +Cambeva barbosae + +sp. nov.: +A. +From the type locality; +B-D. +From +Corrego +Grande, Ilha de Santa Catarina; +E. +From Rio +Biguacu +basin; +F. + +Cambeva botuvera + +sp. nov., from the type locality. + + + + +Figure 4. +Osteological structures of: +A-C. + +Cambeva barbosae + +sp. nov.; +D-F. + +Cambeva botuvera + +sp. nov.: +A, D. +Mesethmoidal region and adjacent structures, left and middle portions, dorsal view; +B, E. +Left suspensorium and opercular series, lateral view; +C, F. +Hyoid arch, ventral view. Abbreviations of structures indicated by arrows are: lep, lateral ethmoid lateral process; mlf, mesethmoidal lateral flap; oig, opercular interarticular gap; ppp parurohyal posterior process. Larger stippling represents cartilaginous areas. + + + + +Description. + +Morphometric data appear in Table +1 +. Body moderately slender, subcylindrical and slightly depressed anteriorly, compressed posteriorly. Greatest body depth in area just anterior to pelvic-fin base. Dorsal profile of head and trunk slightly convex, approximately straight on caudal peduncle; ventral profile straight to slightly convex between lower jaw and end of anal-fin base, straight on caudal peduncle. Skin papillae minute. Anus and urogenital papilla in vertical through anterior portion of dorsal-fin base. Head trapezoidal in dorsal view. Anterior profile of snout convex in dorsal view. Eye small, dorsally positioned in head. Posterior nostril located nearer anterior nostril than orbital rim. Tip of maxillary and rictal barbels reaching posterior half of interopercular patch of odontodes; tip of nasal barbel surpassing posterior margin of orbit, reaching transverse line through middle of interopercular patch of odontodes. Mouth subterminal. Jaw teeth incisiform and slightly curved, 40-52 in premaxilla, 42-45 in dentary, arranged in three or four irregular rows. Branchial membrane attached to isthmus only at its anterior point. Branchiostegal rays 8 or 9. + +Dorsal and anal fins subtriangular; total dorsal-fin rays 11 (ii + II + 7), total anal-fin rays 9 (ii + II + 5); anal-fin origin in vertical through posterior portion of dorsal-fin base, approximately at base of 5th branched dorsal-fin ray. Dorsal-fin origin in vertical between centrum of 19th and 20th vertebrae; anal-fin origin in vertical between centrum of 23rd and 24th vertebra. Pectoral fin subtriangular in dorsal view, posterior margin slightly convex, tip of first pectoral-fin ray not forming filament; total pectoral-fin rays 8 (I + 7). Pelvic fin subtruncate, its extremity in vertical through anterior portion of dorsal-fin base; pelvic-fin bases medially in close proximity; total pelvic-fin rays 5 (I + 4). Caudal fin truncate, postero-dorsal and postero-ventral extremities rounded; total principal caudal-fin rays 13 (I + 11 + I), total dorsal procurrent rays 19-23 (xviii-xxii + I), total ventral procurrent rays 10-12 (ix-xi + I). Vertebrae 36-38. Ribs 12-13. Two dorsal hypural plates, corresponding to hypurals 4 + 5 and 3, respectively; single ventral hypural plate corresponding to hypurals 1 and 2 and parhypural. + + +Laterosensory system +(Fig. +2A-B +). + +Supraorbital sensory canal continuous, connected to posterior section of infraorbital canal posteriorly. Supraorbital sensory canal with 3 pores: s1, adjacent to medial margin of anterior nostril; s3, adjacent and just posterior to medial margin of posterior nostril; and s6, in transverse line through posterior half of orbit; pore s6 nearer orbit than its paired homologous pore. Anterior segment of infraorbital sensory canal absent; posterior segment with two pores, pore i10, adjacent to ventral margin of orbit, and pore i11, posterior to orbit. Postorbital canal with 2 pores: po1, in vertical line above posterior portion of interopercular patch of odontodes, and po2, in vertical line above posterior portion of opercular patch of odontodes. Lateral line of body short, with 2 pores, posterior-most pore in vertical just posterior to pectoral-fin base. + + + +Mesethmoidal region +(Fig. +4A +). + +Mesethmoid robust, its anterior margin slightly concave; mesethmoid cornu narrow, extremity rounded. Lateral ethmoid connected to autopalatine by weak articular facet, which in specimens larger than about 50 mm SL is latero-posteriorly edged by deep notch posteriorly followed by prominent anteriorly directed process. Antorbital thin, drop-shaped; sesamoid supraorbital slender, without processes, its length about three times antorbital length. Premaxilla sub-rectangular in dorsal view, laterally narrowing, moderate in length, slightly longer than maxilla. Maxilla boomerang-shaped, slender, slightly curved. Autopalatine sub-rectangular in dorsal view, medial margin sinuous, lateral margin slightly concave; autopalatine posterolateral process well-developed, narrow, its length about two thirds autopalatine length excluding posterolateral. + + + +Cheek region +(Fig. +4B +). + +Metapterygoid thin, subtriangular, large, its largest length about equal horizontal length of quadrate excluding dorsal process. Quadrate slender, dorsal process with constricted base, dorsoposterior margin separated from hyomandibula outgrowth by small interspace; small process on dorsal margin, just posterior to cartilage block joining quadrate and metapterygoid, laterally overlapping ventral part of metapterygoid. Hyomandibula long, with well-developed anterior outgrowth; middle portion of dorsal margin of hyomandibula outgrowth with shallow concavity. Opercle relatively robust, opercular odontode patch depth about four fifths of dorsal hyomandibula articular facet, with 15-18 odontodes; odontodes pointed, slightly curved, arranged in irregular transverse rows; dorsal process of opercle short and pointed; opercular articular face for hyomandibula with prominent trapezoidal lateral flap, separated from small articular facet for preopercle by deep gap. Interopercle moderate, about two thirds hyomandibula length, with 30-36 odontodes; odontodes pointed, arranged in irregular longitudinal rows. Preopercle compact, with short ventral flap. + + + +Hyoid region +(Fig. +4C +). + +Parurohyal robust, lateral process triangular, straight, laterally directed, tip pointed; parurohyal head well-developed, with indistinct anterolateral paired process; middle foramen small and elliptical; posterior process short, about two thirds distance between anterior margin of parurohyal and anterior insertion of lateral process. Ceratohyals slender. + + + +Colouration in alcohol +(Fig. +1 +). + +Flank, dorsum and head side light brown. Dorsum, flank and head with pale dark brown spots, variable in size and shape, often inconspicuous in specimens from Rio +Biguacu +basin. Venter yellowish grey. Darker pigment concentrated between anterior and posterior nostrils, around opercular patch of odontodes and posterior portion of caudal peduncle; nasal and maxillary barbels dark brown, rictal barbel pale brown with dark brown base. Ventral surface of head yellowish white. Unpaired fins dark yellowish grey, dark brown spots on basal portion of dorsal and caudal fins. Paired fins pale yellow, basal portion of pectoral fin dark yellowish grey. + + + +Colouration in life +(Figs +2A-E +). + +Similar to colouration in alcohol, but yellow pigmentation more intense on trunk and fins orangish yellow in unspotted specimens from Rio +Biguacu +basin. + + + +Distribution and habitat. + + +Cambeva barbosae + +occurs in fast-flowing low-altitude streams (about 15-190 m asl), of coastal river basins, between the +Biguacu +and the +Cubatao +do Sul river basins, as well as in smaller drainages in the Santa Catarina island (Fig. +5 +). + + + +Figure 5. +Map of geographical distribution of + +Cambeva + +in isolated coastal basins in the southern end of the Atlantic Forest, southern Brazil: + +C. barbosae + +sp. nov. (dots), + +C. botuvera + +sp. nov. (triangles), + +C. cubataonis + +(squares); black symbols are type localities, red symbols are paratypes of the new species, and white symbols are additional material, non-types. + + + + +Etymology. + + +Cambeva barbosae + +is named in honour of the Brazilian ichthyologist Maria +Anais +Barbosa, for her efforts to collect and study trichomycterines from Santa Catarina. + + + +Remarks. + +The species collected in the Santa Catarina island and identified as + +Trichomycterus + +sp. by +Bertaco (2009) +, probably is + +Cambeva barbosae + +, since both were collected at the same locality in +Corrego +Grande. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B4/C5/37B4C57376A75A00A50703FAABAA9660.xml b/data/37/B4/C5/37B4C57376A75A00A50703FAABAA9660.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..adcf751105d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B4/C5/37B4C57376A75A00A50703FAABAA9660.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Checklist of digeneans (Platyhelminthes, Trematoda, Digenea) of Georgia + + + +Author + +Arabuli, Lela +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9921-6343 +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia +lela.arabuli.1@iliauni.edu.ge + + + +Author + +Murvanidze, Lali +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia + + + +Author + +Faltynkova, Anna +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-5881 +Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic + + + +Author + +Mumladze, Levan +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-6973 +Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2024 + +2024-01-08 + + +12 + + +110201 +110201 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e110201 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e110201 +1314-2828-12-e110201 +2E017986F1F55AB49BD4F0A41AB76F82 + + + + +Pleurogenoides medians (Olsson, 1876) Travasos, 1921 + + + +Parasite of + +amphibians - +Bufonidae +: + +Bufotes viridis + +; +Ranidae +: + +Pelophylax ridibundus + +, + +Rana macrocnemis + +. + + +Site of infection +: small intestine. + + + +Distribution + +Holarctic distribution; +in Georgia +: EG: Aragvi River Basin, Bazaleti Lake, Martkhopi; WG: Gali, Khobi reported by +Petriashvili (1964) +, +Kurashvili et al. (1977) +, +Burtikashvili and Getzadze (1981) +, +Petriashvili et al. (1985) +and +Murvanidze et al. (2008a) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B4/DF/37B4DF6AACAD921FBD9693E4DED1741B.xml b/data/37/B4/DF/37B4DF6AACAD921FBD9693E4DED1741B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..29bd5c31b3a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B4/DF/37B4DF6AACAD921FBD9693E4DED1741B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Murex turbinellus +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + +M. testa ecaudata turbinata spinis conicis: superioribus majoribus, columella plicata. + +Bonan. kirch. t. +20. +f. +367. + + +Rumph. mus. t. +24. +f. B. + + +Gvalt. test. t. +26. +f. L. + + +Argenv. conch. t. +17. +f. P. + + +Kratzenst. Regenf. +8. +t. +2. +f. +18. + + + + +Habitat in +O. Asiatico +ad Nussaanan. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B5/62/37B562EB472144171A12AC14C4F2D5BF.xml b/data/37/B5/62/37B562EB472144171A12AC14C4F2D5BF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8f2f5eaf095 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B5/62/37B562EB472144171A12AC14C4F2D5BF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ + + + +Revision of the afrotropical species of Zaprionus (Diptera, Drosophilidae), with descriptions of two new species and notes on internal reproductive structures and immature stages + + + +Author + +Yassin, Amir +yassin@legs.cnrs-gif.fr + + + +Author + +David, Jean R. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2010 + +2010-07-23 + + +51 + + +33 +72 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.51.380 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.51.380 +1313-2970-51-33 +44A7F29ED3944B2D981F6C380B935950 +331EC652695364616735FFCCFFE6FF98 +576696 + + + + + +Zaprionus Zaprionus santomensis Yassin & David +sp. n. + + + + +Zaprionus +sp. B in +Araripe et al. 2004 + + + +Diagnosis. + +This species resembles those of the indianus complex in having abdominal tergal spots and F1 spines not borne on protruding tubercule. It can be distinguished from them by the bigger body size, the darker body color mainly in contrast with the frons which is bright orange ( +Fig. 10f +), the wings being dusky rather than hyaline, the smaller hairy brush of the male basitarsus (1/3 of basitarsus) ( +Fig. 5e +), and the lack of an apical introvert in the spermatheca ( +Fig. 13d +). + + + +Description. +♂. TL = 1.40 mm. +Head. Arista with 2 dorsal and 3 ventral rays plus terminal fork; pedicel dark brown. Frons orange tan, with vestigial median stripe plus orbital stripes inwardly bordered with black; ocellar triangle blackened; hw:fw = 2.16, fw:fl = 0.8. Orbital setae in straight line; or1:or2:or3 = 3:2:3, orbito-index = 1.8, oc:or1 = 1.5, poc:oc=0.6, iv:ov = 0.4. Face tan. Gena narrow, o:j = 7.6, o:ch = 5.1. Eye red. +Thorax. Scutum brown, darker than frons, with 2 silvery white stripes. acs in 6 rows in front of adc; adc:pdc = 0.9. Scutellum darker than scutum, with black borders of the stripes expanded posteriorly; bsc:asc = 1.2. Pleura with white pilosity; sterno-index = 0.4. Forefemur with 4 spines not borne on warts on the anteroventral margin. Male basitarsus with a hairy brush. + +Wing +. Dusky; WL:WW = 2.3, C-index = 2.8, 4v-index = 1.4, 4c-index = 0.8, 5x-index = 0.9, M-index = 0.3, ac-index = 2.7, b/c = 0.6, C3 fringe 0.40, and WL = 3.2 mm. + +Abdomen. Entirely yellowish, lighter than thorax, with faint dark spots at the bases of tergal setae. + +Terminalia ( +Fig. 13c +). Epandrium densely pubescent at ventral portion; posterior margin pubescent at dorsal portion with 3 long setae; anterior phragma slightly humped dorsally; epandrial ventral lobe with 4 long setae. Surstylus quadrate with two rows of prensisetae. Cercus triangular laterally. Hypandrium densely pubescent at the lateral portion of the paraphyses. Aedeagus expanded apically; aedeagal flap expanded and deeply serrate. Apodeme subequal in length to aedeagus. + +♀. TL = 1.50 mm, resembles male. + +Terminalia. Oviscape with 8 peg-like and 6 short, marginal setae plus 4 supernumeraries. Spermatheca globulous and smooth ( +Fig. 13d +). + +Egg. Elliptical with 4 equally long and fine filaments. +Larva. Escaping the culture medium when crowded. +Puparium. Horn-index 10.6. + + +Distribution. + +Sao +Tome +and +Principe +. + + + +Type material. + +Holotype (male) and allotype (female), Sao +Tome +and +Principe +: Pico de +Sao +Tome +Park (1,500 m), ex type strain ZNG, 11-VIII-2008, founder female coll. III-2001, D. Lachaise. Paratypes: 10 males and 10 females with the same label. Types deposited in MNHN. + + + +Discussion. + +This species resembles +Zaprionus proximus +, from which it can be distinguished on the basis of F1 ornamentation. An important physiological difference also exists between these species, as +Zaprionus santomensis +is a very heat-sensitive species since a growth temperature of 25°C is lethal for both sexes and males are sterile at 23 and 24°C (cf. +Araripe et al. 2004 +). + + + +Etymology. +The species epithet is in reference to the type locality. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B5/A5/37B5A5882832131F09E0913724DA9FD0.xml b/data/37/B5/A5/37B5A5882832131F09E0913724DA9FD0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8c994c5afcb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B5/A5/37B5A5882832131F09E0913724DA9FD0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Tribe +Ithyporini Lacordaire, 1865 + + + + +Ithyporides +Lacordaire, 1865: 50 [stem: Ithypor-]. Type genus: +Ithyporus +Schoenherr +, 1836. Comment: precedence ( +Ithyporini +Lacordaire, 1865 vs +Sclerocardiini +Lacordaire, 1865) given to taxon originally proposed at the higher rank (Art. 24.1). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B5/C2/37B5C251B561E56F9B254690279E72B3.xml b/data/37/B5/C2/37B5C251B561E56F9B254690279E72B3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5c071461b02 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B5/C2/37B5C251B561E56F9B254690279E72B3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ + + + +Review of the genus Urgleptes Dillon (1956) of Hispaniola (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Acanthocinini): descriptions of five new species and one new synonymy + + + +Author + +Ravin, Ian S. + + + +Author + +Lingafelter, Steven W. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +532 + + +55 +85 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.532.6587 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.532.6587 +1313-2970-532-55 +91B5CB53B58148DCAE0C5E4A589C4AE0 +91B5CB53B58148DCAE0C5E4A589C4AE0 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Coleoptera Cerambycidae + + + +Urgleptes obliteratus Ravin & Lingafelter +sp. n. +Figs 7, 8d, 14, 19 + + + +Diagnosis. + +This species is easily identified by the three dark, circular elytral maculae, originating mediolaterally and extending toward the suture. This dark circular pattern is repeated on the pronotum which usually contains two posteromedial spots, in some specimens, an additional two are located at the base of the lateral tubercles. The elytral suture is narrowly dark brown. Otherwise, the integument is mostly uniform in color, although in +Urgleptes obliteratus +it is much paler yellow or flavous than in +Urgleptes charynae +. Unlike other species, the scape is uniformly pale, with antennomeres light, gradually becoming darker at apices. The femora are also mostly pale, with the tibiae usually darker postmedially. + + + +Figure 14. Digital painting of +Urgleptes obliteratus +sp. n. (illustrated by Taina Litwak, USDA). + + + + +Description. +Measurements: body length: 3.6-4.8 mm; body width: 1.3-1.7 mm; elytral length: 2.5-3.3 mm; elytral width: 0.6-0.8 mm; pronotal length: 0.7-0.9 mm; pronotal width: 1.0-1.6 mm; body length/pronotal length: 5.2-5.4; elytral length/elytral width: 4.0; pronotal length/pronotal width: 0.5-0.6. +Head: covered in uniform pale to golden pubescence, denser at posterior margin of eyes and inner eye notch margin. Antenna: scape extending to posterior fourth of pronotum; pale-flavous, weakly darker apically; covered in fine, pale to golden pubescence. Remaining antennomeres pallid, darkened apically; covered in brown pubescence, with thickened bristle-like setae at apices; mesal surface of third and fourth segments of most specimens usually with thickened setae. Antennae extending beyond elytral apices by approximately five segments. Eye: lower eye lobe about 2.5 times height of upper eye lobe; lobes narrowly connected by about 5 rows of ommatidia in most specimens. Upper eye lobes separated by twice width of upper eye lobe. Mouthparts: clypeus pallid; lacking distinct pubescence. Labrum pallid; anteriorly fringed with long, golden setae; and basal, longer, suberect, dark brown setae. Mandibles light brown, distinctly darkened on apical halves. + +Thorax: pronotum broadly rounded at sides to posteriorly directed, short, acute tubercles on posterior fourth; constricted along posterior fifth behind lateral tubercles; constriction demarcated with row of large, separate punctures across disc, continuing behind base of tubercles and down sides; no other distinct punctures visible. Integument mostly light brown; coated in moderately dense vestiture of white pubescence. +Pronotal +disc with dark anterolateral and posteromedial fasciae. No distinct calli present on pronotal disc. Prosternum impunctate; covered in moderately dense white pubescence. Prosternal process extremely narrow and greatly expanded posteriorly; procoxal cavities nearly touching. Mesepimeron toward metepisternal margin coated with dense, appressed, white pubescence becoming thinner ventrally. Mesosternal intercoxal process about 3-4 times broader than prosternal process. Integument of ventral sclerites mostly light brown, with margins of coxal cavities darkened. Scutellum dark brown; with white, longitudinal fascia. Elytra: moderately, densely punctate; elytral disc mostly pale-orange with suture dark brown from scutellum to apices. Periscutellar region slightly swollen; coated in white to translucent pubescence extending through +out +disc; epipleuron slightly darker than surrounding region. Elytron with three, dark, distinct, circular maculae, originating mediolaterally, obliquely extending toward, but not reaching suture. Some specimens with faint, irregular macula extending anteriorly from apex but not reaching circular maculae. Elytral apex subtruncate, with outer apical angle slightly more produced posteriorly than sutural angle. Legs: femora mostly pallid; uniformly covered with golden to translucent pubescence. Protibiae uniformly pallid; meso- and metatibiae darker apically with thickened, bristle-like setae. Mesotibiae with dorsal concavity apically that is lined with dark, bristle-like setae. Tarsomeres dark brown; coated with long, suberect, dark setae. + +Abdomen: ventrites covered with fine, appressed, white pubescence; integument mottled brown, posteriorly lighter, apical margin of all ventrites slightly lighter. Fifth ventrite one and a half times longer than fourth. Last tergite strongly narrowed and projecting beyond last ventrite. + + +Distribution. +Endemic to Hispaniola, this species has been collected only in low elevation (less than 700 meters) coastal areas of the country (Fig. 19) from May through December. + + +Etymology. + +The epithet, +obliteratus +, refers to the nearly absent maculae on the elytra, unlike most other species of the genus. + + + +Type material. + +Holotype (female): DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: Pedernales Prov., 25 N of Cabo Rojo, 750 meters +18°06.769'N +, +71°37.245'W +, beating, 11 December 2014, S. W. Lingafelter (USNM); Paratypes: DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: +Maria +Trinidad +Sanchez +Prov., +Rio +San Juan, +19°37'17"N +, +70°7'45"W +, 20 July 2008, Julien Touroult (JTPC, 2); Puerto Plata Prov., South of Pico Isabel de Torres, El Cupey Rd., 258 m, +19°45.214'N +, +70°43.6464'W +, 30 July 1999, Ivie & Guerrero (WIBF, 2); San Pedro de +Macoris +Prov., 12 km W of San Pedro de +Macoris +, 5-19 May 1985, E. Giesbert (FSCA). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B5/E8/37B5E8D689F8F78DF0BD8DB0A2A28C57.xml b/data/37/B5/E8/37B5E8D689F8F78DF0BD8DB0A2A28C57.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4eebf3d9675 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B5/E8/37B5E8D689F8F78DF0BD8DB0A2A28C57.xml @@ -0,0 +1,206 @@ + + + +Megafauna of the UKSRL exploration contract area and eastern Clarion-Clipperton Zone in the Pacific Ocean: Annelida, Arthropoda, Bryozoa, Chordata, Ctenophora, Mollusca + + + +Author + +Amon, Diva J + + + +Author + +Ziegler, Amanda F + + + +Author + +Drazen, Jeffrey C + + + +Author + +Grischenko, Andrei V + + + +Author + +Leitner, Astrid B + + + +Author + +Lindsay, Dhugal J + + + +Author + +Voight, Janet R + + + +Author + +Wicksten, Mary K + + + +Author + +Young, Craig M + + + +Author + +Smith, Craig R + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2017 + +5 + + +14598 +14598 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e14598 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e14598 +1314-2828--14598 + + + + +cf. Notoplites morphospecies + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Diva J. Amon, Amanda F. Ziegler +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +Adult +; behavior: On nodule; occurrenceStatus: present; preparations: Imaged only; Taxon: taxonConceptID: cf. Notoplites morphospecies; scientificName: Notoplites sp.; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Bryozoa; class: Gymnolaemata; order: Cheilostomatida; family: Candidae; genus: Notoplites; taxonRank: genus; scientificNameAuthorship: Harmer, 1923; Location: waterBody: Pacific Ocean; stateProvince: Clarion-Clipperton Zone; locality: +UK Seabed Resources Ltd exploration contract area (UK-1) +; verbatimLocality: UK-1 Stratum A; maximumDepthInMeters: 4110; locationRemarks: RV Melville Cruise MV1313; decimalLatitude: +13.8484 +; decimalLongitude: +-116.6567 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 25; Identification: identifiedBy: +Andrei Grischenko, Diva J. Amon, Amanda F. Ziegler +; dateIdentified: 2014; identificationRemarks: Identified only from imagery; identificationQualifier: cf.; Event: samplingProtocol: +Remotely Operated Vehicle +; eventDate: +2013-10-10 +; eventTime: 11:10; habitat: Abyssal polymetallic-nodule field; fieldNumber: Dive 1 (RV01); Record Level: language: en; institutionCode: +UHM +; datasetName: ABYSSLINE; basisOfRecord: HumanObservation + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Diva J. Amon, Amanda F. Ziegler +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +Adult +; behavior: On nodule; occurrenceStatus: present; preparations: Imaged only; Taxon: taxonConceptID: cf. Notoplites morphospecies; scientificName: Notoplites sp.; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Bryozoa; class: Gymnolaemata; order: Cheilostomatida; family: Candidae; genus: Notoplites; taxonRank: genus; scientificNameAuthorship: Harmer, 1923; Location: waterBody: Pacific Ocean; stateProvince: Clarion-Clipperton Zone; locality: +Eastern Clarion-Clipperton Zone +; verbatimLocality: Site EPIRB; maximumDepthInMeters: 3914; locationRemarks: RV Melville Cruise MV1313; decimalLatitude: +13.6793 +; decimalLongitude: +-114.4072 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 25; Identification: identifiedBy: +Andrei Grischenko, Diva J. Amon, Amanda F. Ziegler +; dateIdentified: 2014; identificationRemarks: Identified only from imagery; identificationQualifier: cf.; Event: samplingProtocol: +Remotely Operated Vehicle +; eventDate: +2013-10-23 +; eventTime: 11:52; habitat: Abyssal polymetallic-nodule field; fieldNumber: Dive 7 (RV07); Record Level: language: en; institutionCode: +UHM +; datasetName: ABYSSLINE; basisOfRecord: HumanObservation + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Diva J. Amon, Amanda F. Ziegler +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +Adult +; behavior: On nodule; occurrenceStatus: present; preparations: Imaged only; Taxon: taxonConceptID: cf. Notoplites morphospecies; scientificName: Notoplites sp.; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Bryozoa; class: Gymnolaemata; order: Cheilostomatida; family: Candidae; genus: Notoplites; taxonRank: genus; scientificNameAuthorship: Harmer, 1923; Location: waterBody: Pacific Ocean; stateProvince: Clarion-Clipperton Zone; locality: +UK Seabed Resources Ltd exploration contract area (UK-1) +; verbatimLocality: UK-1 Stratum A; maximumDepthInMeters: 4110; locationRemarks: RV Melville Cruise MV1313; decimalLatitude: +13.8502 +; decimalLongitude: +-116.6457 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 25; Identification: identifiedBy: +Andrei Grischenko, Diva J. Amon, Amanda F. Ziegler +; dateIdentified: 2014; identificationRemarks: Identified only from imagery; identificationQualifier: cf.; Event: samplingProtocol: +Remotely Operated Vehicle +; eventDate: +2013-10-10 +; eventTime: 12:05; habitat: Abyssal polymetallic-nodule field; fieldNumber: Dive 1 (RV01); Record Level: language: en; institutionCode: +UHM +; datasetName: ABYSSLINE; basisOfRecord: HumanObservation + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Diva J. Amon, Amanda F. Ziegler +; individualCount: +1 +; lifeStage: +Adult +; behavior: On nodule; occurrenceStatus: present; preparations: Imaged only; Taxon: taxonConceptID: cf. Notoplites morphospecies; scientificName: Notoplites sp.; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Bryozoa; class: Gymnolaemata; order: Cheilostomatida; family: Candidae; genus: Notoplites; taxonRank: genus; scientificNameAuthorship: Harmer, 1923; Location: waterBody: Pacific Ocean; stateProvince: Clarion-Clipperton Zone; locality: +UK Seabed Resources Ltd exploration contract area (UK-1) +; verbatimLocality: UK-1 Stratum A; maximumDepthInMeters: 4026; locationRemarks: RV Melville Cruise MV1313; decimalLatitude: +13.8647 +; decimalLongitude: +-116.5482 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; coordinateUncertaintyInMeters: 25; Identification: identifiedBy: +Andrei Grischenko, Diva J. Amon, Amanda F. Ziegler +; dateIdentified: 2014; identificationRemarks: Identified only from imagery; identificationQualifier: cf.; Event: samplingProtocol: +Remotely Operated Vehicle +; eventDate: +2013-10-21 +; eventTime: 5:34; habitat: Abyssal polymetallic-nodule field; fieldNumber: Dive 6 (RV06); Record Level: language: en; institutionCode: +UHM +; datasetName: ABYSSLINE; basisOfRecord: HumanObservation + + + + +Notes +Rooted arborescent colonies with delicate bifurcating branches interconnected by transverse parallel series of chitinous tubes (fibers). +Fig. 23 + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B7/7B/37B77BD884401FF1C6C02D1FC799381E.xml b/data/37/B7/7B/37B77BD884401FF1C6C02D1FC799381E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..005704e69a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B7/7B/37B77BD884401FF1C6C02D1FC799381E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Tribe +Estadiini Portevin, 1914 + + + + +Estadiini +Portevin, 1914: 199 [stem: Estadi-]. Type genus: +Estadia +Fairmaire, 1903 [syn. of +Dietta +Sharp, 1876]. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B7/DF/37B7DFC8497A120C6BB530CB2DA4AA29.xml b/data/37/B7/DF/37B7DFC8497A120C6BB530CB2DA4AA29.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..58e194eee44 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B7/DF/37B7DFC8497A120C6BB530CB2DA4AA29.xml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Nyctanthes undulata +, +spec. nov. + + + +3. Nyctanthes foliis ovatis acuminatis undulatis, ramis teretibus. + +Jasminum indicum, flore polypetalo exalbido, fructu minori. +Ray. hist. 1601. + + +Tsieregam-mulla. +Rheed. mal.6. p.97. t.55. + + + + +Habitat in +Malabaria +. ♄ + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B8/B9/37B8B91647D0BBAD0690862AE6DD91BA.xml b/data/37/B8/B9/37B8B91647D0BBAD0690862AE6DD91BA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..437ca73701f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B8/B9/37B8B91647D0BBAD0690862AE6DD91BA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ + + + +A synoptic review of the ants of California (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). + + + +Author + +Ward, P. S. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2005 + +936 + + +1 +68 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/21008/21008.pdf + +journal article +21008 + + + + + + +Hypoponera punctatissima (Roger +1859) + + + + + +I [introduced species] + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B9/12/37B91251248A575989AD8DBB1541C6C0.xml b/data/37/B9/12/37B91251248A575989AD8DBB1541C6C0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fe792203003 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B9/12/37B91251248A575989AD8DBB1541C6C0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +An annotated checklist of grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Acridoidea) from Mongolia + + + +Author + +Gankhuyag, Enkhtsetseg +Department of Biology, Teachers College, and Institute for Phylogenomics and Evolution, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, South Korea + + + +Author + +Dorjsuren, Altanchimeg +Institute of Biology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 133330, Mongolia & College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010031, China + + + +Author + +Choi, Eun Hwa +Department of Biology, Teachers College, and Institute for Phylogenomics and Evolution, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, South Korea + + + +Author + +Hwang, Ui Wook +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9735-8716 +Institute for Korean Herb-Bio Convergence Promotion, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, South Korea & Institute of Phylogenomics and Evolution, and Department of Biology, Teachers College Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea & School of Industrial Technology Advances, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, South Korea & Phylomics Inc., Daegu 41910, South Korea +uwhwang@knu.ac.kr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-03-13 + + +11 + + +96705 +96705 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e96705 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e96705 +1314-2828-11-e96705 +4617927B23675D59913B38550B7D9972 + + + + +Mongolotmethis michidi Batkhuyag, Batnaran & Dorjderem, 2014 + + + +Native status + +Distribution in the natural zone +: Steppe and desert steppe. + + + +Distribution + +in Mongolia +: G.-alt., U.-govi. +Batkhuyag et al. (2014) +, +Batkhuyag and Batnaran (2021) +:35. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B9/7B/37B97B60DC258325D000549BD14EB76E.xml b/data/37/B9/7B/37B97B60DC258325D000549BD14EB76E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e08529ee704 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B9/7B/37B97B60DC258325D000549BD14EB76E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Two new species of the genus Diostracus Loew from Tibet, with a key to the Himalayan fauna (Diptera, Dolichopodidae) + + + +Author + +Wang, Ning + + + +Author + +Wang, Baohai + + + +Author + +Yang, Ding + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +488 + + +91 +104 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.488.8919 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.488.8919 +1313-2970-488-91 +C9DBF1A93FE14F75AAB662460E83C2E0 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Diptera Dolichopodidae + + + +Diostracus nebulosus Takagi, 1972 + + + +Diagnosis. + +First flagellomere ( +Yang et al. 2011 +, fig. 199b) 1.3 times longer than wide, obtuse apically; arista dorsal. Wing ( +Yang et al. 2011 +, fig. 199a) with an obscure spot at anteroapical corner of discal cell; crossvein m-cu straight. Male cercus ( +Yang et al. 2011 +, fig. 199d) short, subtriangular. + + + +Distribution. +China (Tibet), Nepal. + + +Remarks. + +This species belongs to the +nebulosus +-group. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B9/A8/37B9A8E64ABC5581B177B0CE9918E882.xml b/data/37/B9/A8/37B9A8E64ABC5581B177B0CE9918E882.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0a1e36176ac --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B9/A8/37B9A8E64ABC5581B177B0CE9918E882.xml @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ + + + +An updated checklist of the marine fish fauna of Redang Islands, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Du, Jianguo + + + +Author + +Loh, Kar-Hoe + + + +Author + +Hu, Wenjia + + + +Author + +Zheng, Xinqing + + + +Author + +Affendi, Yang Amri + + + +Author + +Ooi, Jillian Lean Sim + + + +Author + +Ma, Zhiyuan + + + +Author + +Rizman-Idid, Mohammed + + + +Author + +Chan, Albert Apollo + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2019 + +7 + + +47537 +47537 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e47537 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e47537 +1314-2828-7-e47537 +F940F7FD0A3541E98BDD33F83C2369D5 +AE1BE74780565E8D9B3522053F3B0983 + + + + +Abudefduf vaigiensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1825) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. +Occurrence: +occurrenceID: BDJ_12482_211; +Location: +country: +Malaysia +; locality: +Redang islands +; +Identification: +identifiedBy: +Loh KH and Du Jianguo + + + + +Notes + +Harborne et al. 2000 +; +Yusuf et al. 2001 +; This study. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B9/A9/37B9A9B9DF2873067847156805C322C8.xml b/data/37/B9/A9/37B9A9B9DF2873067847156805C322C8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f7431444abd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B9/A9/37B9A9B9DF2873067847156805C322C8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ + + + +Scarabaeinae dung beetles from Ecuador: a catalog, nomenclatural acts, and distribution records + + + +Author + +Chamorro, William + + + +Author + +Marin-Armijos, Diego + + + +Author + +senjo, Angelico + + + +Author + +Vaz-De-Mello, Fernando Z. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +826 + + +1 +343 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.826.26488 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.826.26488 +1313-2970-826-1 +B1550A3AE54744509A44BC4366D5E110 + + + + +Bdelyrus pecki Cook, 1998 +Plate 6B + + + + +Bdelyrus pecki +Cook, 1998: 652 (original description. Type locality: Ecuador, Pastaza, 25 km N of Puyo). + + +Bdelyrus pecki +: +Cook 2000 +: 553-554 (characters in key); +Donoso et al. 2009 +: Appendix II. 16 (catalog of types MQCAZ); +Carvajal et al. 2011 +: 318-319 (cited for Ecuador); +Krajcik 2012 +: 52 (complete list of species); +Ratcliffe et al. 2015 +: 196 (cited for Peru); +Chamorro et al. 2018 +: 78 (figure 1H), 79 (figure 2A), 91 (cited for Ecuador). + + + +Type specimens. + +Bdelyrus pecki +Cook, 1998. The holotype (♂) is deposited at the HAHC (ex. coll. H. Howden) (see +Cook 1998 +: 653) [= name-bearing types now in CMCN]. Locality: Ecuador, Pastaza, 25 km N of Puyo, 1000 m, not examined. One paratype is deposited in the MQCAZ. Locality: Napo, +Hollin +1100 m, examined. + + +Paratype (sex unknown): "ECUADOR / NAPO / HOLLIN 1100m / 7 +-12- +91 / F.CACERES [p]", "PARATYPE +Bdelyrus +/ +pecki +Cook [p, yellow label]". + + + +Distribution. +Brazil, Ecuador, and Peru. + + +Records examined. + +NAPO: Pacto Sumaco, 1620 m (2 specimens MUTPL). Reventador (2 specimens CEMT); Sc Reventador, 1100 m (1 specimen CEMT). +SUCUMBIOS +: Reventador (1 specimen CEMT). ZAMORA CHINCHIPE: RVS El Zarza campamento las +Penas +consecion +El Zarza, Cordillera del +Condor +, 1530 m (1 specimen MUTPL). + + + +Literature records. + +NAPO: km 7.3 road Sarayacu-Loreto, 1200 m ( +Cook 1998 +: 553); 12 km southwest of Tena, 500 m ( +Cook 1998 +: 553); +Hollin +, 1100 m ( +Cook 1998 +: 553; +Donoso et al. 2009 +: Appendix II. 16); +Rio +Hollin +, 1100 m ( +Cook 1998 +: 553). PASTAZA: 25 km N of Puyo, 1000 m ( +Cook 1998 +: 553); 22 km southeast of Puyo, 900 m ( +Cook 1998 +: 553); Llandia 17 km N of Puyo, 1000 m ( +Cook 1998 +: 553); Puyo ( +Cook 1998 +: 553). + + + +Temporal data. +Collected in January, May, June, July, September, November, and December. + + +Remarks. +Inhabits the evergreen foothill forests and evergreen lower montane forests of the Amazon region from 1000-1620 m a.s.l. Collected with flight interception traps and canopy fogging methods. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B9/B4/37B9B4EA06F20EBD9782E6F85A6BCB39.xml b/data/37/B9/B4/37B9B4EA06F20EBD9782E6F85A6BCB39.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c334efaf359 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B9/B4/37B9B4EA06F20EBD9782E6F85A6BCB39.xml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ + + + +An illustrated key to the genera of Thripinae (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) from Iran + + + +Author + +Mirab-balou, Majid + + + +Author + +Minaei, Kambiz + + + +Author + +Chen, Xue-Xin + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +317 + + +27 +52 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.317.5447 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.317.5447 +1313-2970-317-27 + + + + +Psilothrips Hood + + + +Remarks. + +Included here only from descriptions, this genus includes five species in the world ( +ThripsWiki 2013 +) of which +Psilothrips bimaculatus +(Priesner) has been reported from Iran ( +Bhatti et al. 2009a +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B9/B7/37B9B735DD3C5573B74F1518EEB4A6B0.xml b/data/37/B9/B7/37B9B735DD3C5573B74F1518EEB4A6B0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8927048621e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B9/B7/37B9B735DD3C5573B74F1518EEB4A6B0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + +Checklist of national key protected wild plants on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau + + + +Author + +Chen, Ronglian +University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China & Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China + + + +Author + +Zhang, Faqi +Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China + + + +Author + +Chen, Shilong +Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China + + + +Author + +Chi, Xiaofeng +Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China +xfchi@nwipb.cas.cn + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-05-16 + + +11 + + +103289 +103289 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e103289 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e103289 +1314-2828-11-e103289 +D2D96D0A93125BF2BD8A1911FBE4E783 + + + + +Aglaia lawii (Wight) C.J. Saldanha, 1976 + + + +Conservation status +LC + + +Distribution +China, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B9/C3/37B9C344EEE6824001AF78BCBF37856D.xml b/data/37/B9/C3/37B9C344EEE6824001AF78BCBF37856D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0798ec2e7d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B9/C3/37B9C344EEE6824001AF78BCBF37856D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + +The Carabidae (Coleoptera) of Shada Al-A'Ala Nature Reserve, Southwestern Saudi Arabia, with description of a new species of Paussinae + + + +Author + +Abdel-Dayem, Mahmoud S. + + + +Author + +Elgharbawy, Ali A. + + + +Author + +Rasool, Iftekhar + + + +Author + +Nagel, Peter + + + +Author + +Aldhafer, Hathal M. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +812 + + +93 +131 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.812.30937 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.812.30937 +1313-2970-812-93 +F105E9A6A4F842209E1798923FC6535F + + + + +Tachyura biblis (Britton, 1948) + + + +Material examined. +471 m: 03.III.2015, LT, 3 exs. 963 m: 03.XI.2013, HP, 1 ex. 1225 m, 02.III.2015, LT, 6 exs; 05.V.2015, LT, 2 exs. 1,325 m: 27.I.2015, LT, 2 exs; 02.III.2015, LT, 24 exs; 21.IV.2014, LT, 2 exs; 05.V.2015, LT, 19 exs; 23.VIII.2014, LT, 1 ex. 1,474 m: 27.I.2015, LT, 1 ex; 02.III.2015, LT, 14 exs; 05.V.2015, LT, 8 exs. 1,563 m: 02.III.2015, LT, 3 exs; 05.V.2015, LT, 6 exs. 1,611 m: 02.III.2015, LT, 2 exs; 21.IV.2014, LT, 1 ex; 05.V.2015, LT, 3 exs; 03.VI.2014, SW, 1 ex; 27.VII.2015, LT, 1 ex. 1,666 m: 05.V.2015, LT, 1 ex; 27.VII.2015, LT, 1 ex; 17.X.2014, LT, 1 ex. + + +General distribution and zoogeography. +AE, DJ, DZ, IR, MR, NE, SA, TD, YE. AFR_SAR species. + + +Published records. + +Asir ( +Abdel-Dayem et al. 2018 +), Riyadh (Basilewsky 1979). + + + +Remarks. +A common species, which was collected during all seasons of the year with the peak reached during winter (March). The adults were collected from both major plant communities in the SANR and from a wide altitudinal range (471-1666 m). Mahmoud Abdel-Dayem identified this species. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/B9/EE/37B9EE1F149926B30900153E1F766DA8.xml b/data/37/B9/EE/37B9EE1F149926B30900153E1F766DA8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6d1371c4f2d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/B9/EE/37B9EE1F149926B30900153E1F766DA8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Phalaena pulveraria +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + + +P. +Geometra +pectinicornis, alis omnibus testaceopulverulentis: fascia lata ferruginea. + + + + +Habitat in +Europa. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BA/C5/37BAC5B8632065DFE8111AC855CF83A1.xml b/data/37/BA/C5/37BAC5B8632065DFE8111AC855CF83A1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..86ce33a543b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BA/C5/37BAC5B8632065DFE8111AC855CF83A1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,216 @@ + + + +Four new species of Oidardis Hermann, 1912 (Diptera, Asilidae, Laphriinae, Atomosiini) from two major faunistic surveys in the Atlantic Rainforest + + + +Author + +Cezar, Lucas A. + + + +Author + +Fisher, Eric M. + + + +Author + +Lamas, Carlos J. E. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +350 + + +47 +74 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.350.6096 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.350.6096 +1313-2970-350-47 +4F2372C9795B4A2AA09FF3A1526713DB +4F2372C9795B4A2AA09FF3A1526713DB + + + + + +Oidardis +marinonii + +sp. n. +Figures 1 +G-H +, 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 6 +J-L +, 7D, 8D, 10 + + + +Diagnosis. +Pleura yellow; scutum yellow laterally and anteriorly, tergites yellow on lateral margins; scape and pedicel yellow or light brown. Males without modified tibial seta. + + +Description. +Holotype. Male. Body yellow and black. Total length, excluding antennae, 7.3 mm; length of thorax, 1.7 mm; length of wing, 6.2 mm; greatest width of abdomen, 1.2 mm. + +Head, laterally. Face, between antennal insertion and gibbosity, plane with eye margin; gibbosity slightly prominent, equals ventral 0.33 of face height; dorsal occipital setae light-brown, lateral occipital setae light-brown, ventral occipital setae yellow; proboscis 0.52 +x +the height of head, with a pair of yellow macrosetae ventrally; palpus dark-brown, with yellow setae apically. Antenna. Antenna 0.74 +x +as long as the height of eye, yellow scape and pedicel, dark-brown postpedicel, with dark-brown and yellow setae and macrosetae; antennal insertion at dorsal 0.28 of head height; scape slightly longer than pedicel, with long ventral seta, numerous short setae on a row around the segment; pedicel oval; postpedicel lanceolate, 1.8 +x +length of basal two segments, golden-pollinose, except for silvery-yellow pollinosity on elliptical sensorial area on inner face, with dorsal spine subapical (3/4 length of postpedicel or beyond). Head, anteriorly. Head 1.4 +x +as wide as high; face 0.17 +x +as wide as head, silvery-pollinose, on gibbosity only; mystax long (extending beyond the apex of proboscis), comprised of 10 pale-yellow macrosetae, and few shorter setae between the rows; facial setae, other than mystax, pale-yellow; frons silvery-pollinose; orbital setae dark-brown; vertex coppery-pollinose; ocellar tubercle coppery-pollinose, lower than vertex, 0.3 +x +as wide as frons, anterior ocellus 0.09 +x +as wide as frons by the ocellus position. + +Thorax. Postpronotal lobe yellow; scutum shiny dark-brown posteriorly and yellow to light-brown anteriorly, not punctate, vestiture golden, unequal-sized, reclinate anteriorly and proclinate posteriorly; one golden notopleural; scutellum dark-brown, scutellar margin strongly impressed, marginal scutellar macrosetae dark-brown, unequal-sized, longest ones slightly longer than scutellum; postalar callosity light-brown, partly with bright-blue reflections; pleuron yellow, with silvery-white pollinosity; setulae on proepisternum, katepisternum, and anepisternum yellow; two anepisternal macrosetae, plus fine setulae, yellow; tuft of katatergal macrosetae light-brown; anatergite with yellow, hair-like setae. + +Legs. Coxae yellow; trochanter yellow, with fine yellow setulae; femora reddish-yellow, slightly darkened dorsally, covered with short stout brown setulae dorsally, with dark setae on apical 1/3 dorsally, ventrally with weak yellow setae in two rows and fine yellow setulae apically, hind femur with 3 long yellow ventral macrosetae; anterior four tibiae entirely yellow, with yellow setulae, long yellow macrosetae, long dark-brown macrosetae and thick spines; hind tibia orange, with stout golden setulae apically, white setulae ventrally, long dark-brown macroseta inserted ventrally on +the +middle, long dark-brown macrosetae posteriorly, and long dark-brown macrosetae anterodorsally; modified tibial setae absent; tarsi reddish-brown, with claw-like dark-brown setae ventrally, stout dark-brown setae dorsally, and densely covered with thick spine-like dark-brown setae, 5th tarsomere with 3 setae apically, opposite the claws and longer than them; claws yellow on base and black apically; pulvilli yellow and fringed; empodium shorter than claws. + + +Wing. Brownish, darker along upper margin; cell r1 with short slightly-concave stalk (2 +x +the length of r-m); crossvein r-m at distal half of cell d, distal to the end of Sc; cell m3 narrowing distally (M2 and M3 converging by the end of cell m3), with stalk slightly longer than r-m, apex of m3 and apex of cell d parallel, unaligned, apex of m3 before apex of d, and unaligned, apex of m3 beyond apex of d (right wing) and apex of m3 before apex of d (left wing); crossvein bm-cu long, base of M3 and CuA1 distant from each other and not appearing as an +"X" +; cell cup with stalk shorter than r-m; posterior margin of wing slightly convex at distal half; calypters pale-yellow, with light-brown margin and fringe of short brown setae; halter with yellow stem, brown knob. + + +Abdomen. Black with yellow lateral margins, punctate, with sides nearly parallel, T2 1.46 +x +wider than long; vestiture longer and lighter laterally and ventrally, several light-yellow macrosetae present on lateral margin of T1, T2, T3, and T4. Male terminalia. Hypopygium very conspicuous; hypandrium regular-sized (2/3 the width of hypopygium or more), much wider than long, anterior margin concave, posterior margin slightly pointed (hypandrium triangular-like); gonocoxites free, gonocoxal prolongation blunt, smoothly curved inwards, with 3 spines at apex; gonostylus reduced, much +wider +than long, laterally flattened, fused basally to gonocoxite, attached to the base of gonocoxite; apex of phallus with three equal-sized prongs; epandrium straight in lateral view; lobes of hypoproct short. + + +Female. Total length, excluding antennae, 6.2 mm, (n=1); length of thorax, 1.6 mm, (n=1); length of wing, 7.0 mm, (n=1); greatest width of abdomen, 1.1 mm, (n=1). Differs from male as follows: gibbosity that equals ventral 0.3 of face height; proboscis 0.6 +x +the height of head; antenna 0.71 +x +as long as the height of eye; antennal insertion at dorsal 0.24 of head height; postpedicel 1.7 +x +length of basal two segments; head 1.52 +x +as wide as high; face 0.18 +x +as wide as head; mystax comprised of 8 macrosetae; tuft of katatergal macrosetae yellow; femora yellow and slightly darkened dorsally, except entirely reddish-brown hind femur; femora ventrally with weak yellow setae in two rows; tibiae with yellow setulae, long yellow macrosetae, and long dark-brown macrosetae; hind tibiae entirely covered by dark-brown setulae, with long, dark-brown macroseta inserted ventrally on the middle and long, dark-brown macrosetae anterodorsally; cell m3 parallel-sided distally (M2 and M3 parallel by the end of cell m3), and with stalk as long as r-m; apex of cell m3 and apex of cell d angled and unaligned, apex of m3 before apex of d; calypters white; halter with milk-coffee knob; abdominal segments narrow, T2 1.88 +x +wider than long; several macrosetae present on lateral margin of T1, T2, and T3; one lateral marginal macrosetae present on T4. Female genitalia. Three spermathecae; reservoirs cylindrical, coiled; spermathecal ducts opening independently at the bursa; genital fork rectangular, U-shaped, arms anteriorly thick, posteriorly slender, divergent; accessory glands distinguishable only for the duct and opening to bursa. + + +Morphological variation. Total length, excluding antennae, 6.2-7.3 mm, (n=5); length of thorax, 1.4-1.8 mm, (n=5); length of wing, 5.7-6.6 mm, (n=5); greatest width of abdomen, 1.0-1.1 mm, (n=4). Some specimens differed from the holotype, as follows: gibbosity that equals ventral 0.26-0.35 of face height; proboscis 0.56-0.64 +x +the height of head; antenna 0.71-0.82 +x +as long as the height of eye; light-brown scape and pedicel, dark-brown postpedicel; antennal insertion at dorsal 0.2-0.31 of head height; postpedicel 1.6-2.7 +x +length of basal two segments; head 1.42-1.53 +x +as wide as high; face 0.14-0.18 +x +as wide as head; face golden-pollinose, as a whole; mystax comprised of 8-10 golden macrosetae; ocellar tubercle 0.3-0.34 +x +as wide as frons; anterior ocellus 0.11 +x +as wide as frons by the ocellus position; one or two anepisternal macrosetae; apex of cell m3 and apex of cell d unaligned, apex of m3 before apex of d, or unaligned, apex of m3 beyond apex of d; crossvein bm-cu short, base of M3 and CuA1 arranged almost as an +"X" +; T2 1.11-1.41 +x +wider than long. + + + +Distribution. + +Brazil ( +Sao +Paulo and +Parana +). + + + +Remarks. + +This species is similar to + +Oidardis +fontenellei + +in general morphology and color pattern. However, since the examined specimens of +Oidardis marinonii +come from a small collection series and are poorly preserved, the observed differences in color of antenna and legs should be used cautiously. The direction of vestiture on the posterior portion of scutum and the absence of the modified tibial seta on males in +Oidardis marinonii +thus become all the more important for separating these species. Nevertheless, the general color pattern-paler pleura and dark scutum-is quite noticeable, even considering preservation issues of the material, and is still reliable when distinguishing both species from others in +Oidardis +. + +It is also important to remark that the holotype presents an asymmetry concerning the relative position of cells d and m3, when left and right wings are compared. + +Oidardis marinonii +probably occur in the understory of dense forests, since it is recorded for +Cubatao +. This locality is situated in the coastal forests of Serra do Mar, a typical Ombrophilous Dense Forest. Therefore, in Ponta Grossa-situated in Araucaria Moist Forest area, but largely covered by grasslands ("campos limpos")- +Oidardis marinonii +possibly occupies patches of Araucaria woodlands and riparian forests ( +Marinoni and Dutra 1991 +, +Olson et al. 2001 +). + + + +Etymology. + +Honors late Dr. Renato Marinoni, for his efforts on promoting, besides other projects, an important zoological survey in +Parana +State (PROFAUPAR), that made available specimens for this species, and many other, to be recognized and described. + + + +Type-material examined. + +Holotype: Brazil: +Parana +, Ponta Grossa, Parque Estadual de Vila Velha - IAP, ( +25°2'37.29"S +, +50°14'52.83"W +), 22.xii.1986, coll. Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR - male (DZUP). Paratypes: Brazil: Same locality as holotype, 15.xii.1986, coll. Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR - 1 female, 3 males (DZUP, MZUSP); same locality, 22.xii.1986, coll. Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR - 5 males (DZUP, MZUSP); same locality, 29.xii.1986, coll. Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR - 3 males (DZUP); +Sao +Paulo, +Cubatao +, ( +23°53'44.02"S +, +46°25'32.28"W +), 15.xii.1955, coll. Pereira, Martinez, Werner & +d'Andretta +- 1 male (MZUSP). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BA/EA/37BAEA182064624D321B590EC07A0795.xml b/data/37/BA/EA/37BAEA182064624D321B590EC07A0795.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d9c4cb555fc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BA/EA/37BAEA182064624D321B590EC07A0795.xml @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the pelidnotine scarabs (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae, Rutelini) and annotated catalog of the species and subspecies + + + +Author + +Moore, Matthew R. +Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida Building 1881 Natural Drive Area, Steinmetz Hall, Box 110620, Gainesville, FL 32611 - 0620, USA + + + +Author + +Jameson, Mary L. +Department of Biological Sciences, Wichita State University 1845 Fairmount, Box 26, Wichita, KS 67260 - 0026, USA +maryliz.jameson@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Garner, Beulah H. +Natural History Museum, Insects Division, Department of Life Sciences, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, UK + + + +Author + +Audibert, Cedric +Musee des Confluences, Centre de Conservation et d'Etude des Collections, 13 A Rue Bancel, F- 69007 Lyon, France + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. +Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P. O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, K 1 P 6 P 4, Canada + + + +Author + +Seidel, Matthias + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +2017-04-06 + + +666 + + +1 +349 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.666.9191 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.666.9191 +1313-2970-666-1 +B3C377E8BBB14F328AECA2C22D1E625A +C43EEB41A94B930FFE439D1FAD29FF9C +579453 + + + + +Pelidnota chiriquicola Ohaus, 1913 + + + + +Pelidnota laevissima chiriquicola +Ohaus, 1913: 499 [original combination]. + + +Pelidnota (Pelidnota) laevissima chiriquicola +Ohaus [new subgeneric combination by +Ohaus 1918 +: 23]. + + +Pelidnota chiriquicola +Ohaus [removal of subgeneric classification and new species status by +Soula 2009 +: 102-103]. + + + +Distribution. + +COSTA RICA: Puntarenas ( +Hardy 1975 +; + +Solis +and +Moron +1994 + +; +Soula 2009 +). PANAMA: +Chiriqui +( +Ohaus 1913 +, +1918 +, +1934b +, +Blackwelder 1944 +, +Machatschke 1972 +, +Hardy 1975 +, +Ratcliffe 2002 +, +Krajcik 2008 +, +Soula 2009 +). + + + +Remarks. + +Krajcik (2012 +, +2013 +) considered + +P. chiriquicola + +to be a subspecies of + +P. laevissima + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BB/19/37BB1949CD7E537497FC2860C0803AAA.xml b/data/37/BB/19/37BB1949CD7E537497FC2860C0803AAA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fef77f35014 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BB/19/37BB1949CD7E537497FC2860C0803AAA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + +Checklist of the marine malacofauna of Culuccia Peninsula (NW Sardinia, Italy), with notes on relevant species + + + +Author + +Mariottini, Paolo +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1044-7108 +Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy +paolo.mariottini@uniroma3.it + + + +Author + +Smriglio, Carlo +Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy + + + +Author + +Oliverio, Marco +Dept. of Biology & Biotechnologies ' Charles Darwin', Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy + + + +Author + +Rossi, Sabrina +Biru S. r. l. Agricola, S. Teresa di Gallura (SS), Italy + + + +Author + +Di Giulio, Andrea +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0508-0751 +Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy & NBFC - National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, Italy + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2024 + +2024-02-28 + + +12 + + +115051 +115051 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e115051 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e115051 +1314-2828-12-e115051 +71D09B0C44175D4AAD6B2BD0C86E12F6 + + + + +Clanculus corallinus (Gmelin, 1791) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: + +Other material +. + +Occurrence +: + +occurrenceID: +755CB4CD-55F9-5E57-AD4B-99BA30F61896 +; + +Location +: + +country: +Italy +; countryCode: IT; stateProvince: +Sassari +; locality: + +Island of Culuccia + +; verbatimLatitude: +41 13 17.70N +; verbatimLongitude: +9 17 21.41E +; geodeticDatum: WGS84 + + + + + +Notes +Shell. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BB/3E/37BB3E0577F650AD9CA20FA6E8FDE9F4.xml b/data/37/BB/3E/37BB3E0577F650AD9CA20FA6E8FDE9F4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b004b89dc35 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BB/3E/37BB3E0577F650AD9CA20FA6E8FDE9F4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1217 @@ + + + +Four new species of Marphysa (Annelida, Eunicida, Eunicidae) from the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia + + + +Author + +Che Engku Abdullah, Che Engku Siti Mariam +https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8371-1141 +Institute of Oceanography and Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Idris, Izwandy +0000-0003-1516-8175 +Institute of Oceanography and Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Fahmi, Afiq Durrani Mohd +0000-0002-5131-0098 +Institute of Oceanography and Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Flaxman, Beth +0000-0002-0329-9525 +South China Sea Repository and Reference Centre, Institute of Oceanography and Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia & Mangrove Research Unit, Institute of Oceanography and Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Hutchings, Pat +0000-0001-7521-3930 +Mangrove Research Unit, Institute of Oceanography and Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia & Faculty of Science and Marine Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2024 + +2024-06-04 + + +1204 + + +65 +103 + + + +journal article +10.3897/zookeys.1204.117261 +0704A2BB-6173-44BD-A1F7-CB3EDCFDC5DC + + + + + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 1 +, +2 +, +8 +, +9 +, +10 + + + + +Material examined. + + + + + +Holotype + +. + +UMTAnn 2149 +, complete, antero-ventrally dissected, some parapodia mounted for SEM + +. + + + +Paratypes + +. + + +AM +W. 54044 + +, complete, some parapodia mounted for SEM. +LACM-AHF 13494 +to 13496, complete, some parapodia removed; +ZRC. ANN. 1604 +to 1606, complete, some parapodia removed; SAM-MB-A 096021, complete, some parapodia removed + +. All material was collected from the east coast of Peninsular +Malaysia +, +Terengganu +, +Merchang +mangrove estuary +( + +05 ° 01.393 ' N +, +103 ° 17.994 ' E + +), + +October 2021 + +. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Prostomium completely bilobed, five prostomial appendages without articulations; eyes present. Peristomium without peristomial cirri. Maxillary apparatus with four pairs of maxillae, an unpaired on the left side, MI with falcal arch extended at sub-right angle, basal outer edge arched, basal inner edge lacking curvature. MII with triangular teeth and without attachment lamella. MIII slightly curved, with equal-sized triangular teeth, without attachment lamella. MIV with rectangular and curved attachment lamella. Branchiae distributed along entire body. Dorsal cirri without articulations; postchaetal lobe well developed in anterior regions. Ventral cirri with swollen, inflated base. Sub-aciculae black, blunt, and translucent at distal end, pale brown in posterior-most parapodia. Supra-acicular chaetae include limbate, pectinate thin, narrow isodont with short and slender inner teeth, pectinate thick, wide isodont with short or long and slender inner teeth, and pectinate thick, narrow and wide anodont with long and thick inner teeth. Subacicular chaetae include only compound spinigers. Subacicular hook unidentate throughout chaetigers. Pygidium with two pairs of anal cirri, without articulation. + + + +Description + + + +(based on +holotype +, with variation in parentheses for +paratypes +). + +Preserved specimen beige (Fig. +8 A +), 257 (165–294) chaetigers, +94 mm +( +37–144 mm +) long, +L 10 +- +5.25 mm +( +3.45–5.85 mm +), +W 10 +- +2.85 mm +( +1.95–3.15 mm +), excluding parapodia. Anterior region of body with dorsum convex and flat ventrum, without groove (Fig. +8 A +); body depressed from chaetiger 25, elongated and tapering at distal end. Live specimens pink with red branchiae (Fig. +10 D +). + + + + + + + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +Holotype UMTAnn 2149 ( +B – H +), paratype UMTAnn 2148 ( +A +). Light microscopy images and digital drawing +A +anterior end, lateral view +B +anterior end, dorsal view. Arrows indicate eyes +C +maxillae, dorsal view +D +mandibles, dorsal view +E +parapodium, chaetiger 10 +F +parapodium, chaetiger 134 +G +parapodium, chaetiger 250 +H +posterior segments and pygidium, ventral view. Arrows show the short pair of pygidial cirri. Abbreviations; MI – MV: maxillae I – V, Ac: aciculae, Dc: dorsal cirrus, Vc: ventral cirrus, PCl: prechaetal lobe, Cl: chaetal lobe, PtCl: postchaetal lobe, Sah: subacicular hook, Bf: branchial filament. Scale bars: 1 mm ( +A – D, H +); 0.1 mm ( +E – G +). + + + +Prostomium bilobed, anteriorly rounded with two dorsoventrally flattened lobes with an anterior notch between them (Fig. +8 A, B +). Prostomial appendages in a semicircle, median antenna isolated by a gap (Fig. +8 B +). Palps reach middle of second peristomial ring; lateral antennae reaching chaetiger 2; median antenna reaching chaetiger 3. Palpophores and ceratophores ring-shaped, short, and thick; palpostyles and ceratostyles tapering, and slender. Prostomial appendage peduncles absent. A pair of faded brown eyes present at posterior base of prostomium, between palps and lateral antennae (Fig. +8 B +). Peristomium larger and wider than prostomium; first ring is 2.5 × longer than second ring, separation between rings distinct on all sides. + + +Maxillae pale brown (Fig. +8 C +), and maxillary formula as follows: +MF += 1 + 1, 5 (4–5) + 5 (5–6), 7 (6–7) + 0, 4 (4–5) + 8 (5–8), 1 + 1. Maxillary carrier ~ 2.5 × shorter than MI, rectangular anteriorly, triangular posteriorly. MI forceps-like, without attachment lamellae, falcal arch extended at sub-right angle, basal outer edge arched, basal inner edge lacking a curvature. Closing system ~ 3 × shorter than MI. Ligament between MI and MII pale brown. MII without attachment lamella, teeth triangular, distributed on <1 / 2 length of the plate. Ligament between MII and MIII pale brown. MIII single, longer than left MIV slightly curved, with equal-sized triangular teeth, without attachment lamella. Left MIV short (<1 / 2 the size of right MIV) with rectangular attachment lamellae. Right MIV long with curved attachment lamellae, teeth triangular, decreasing in size and teeth curved posteriorly. MV paired. Mandible pale brown, with concentric stripes, longer than MI; cutting plates whitish (Fig. +8 D +). + + +First few parapodia located ventrolaterally but gradually becoming dorsolateral in subsequent segments. Chaetal lobes rounded in anterior and posterior chaetigers, conical in median chaetigers (Fig. +8 E – G +). Prechaetal lobe shorter than chaetal lobe throughout body. Postchaetal lobe digitiform in first three chaetigers then rounded thereafter; longer than chaetal lobe in median chaetigers onwards, become shorter and absent in the posterior-most chaetigers. Dorsal cirri digitiform and slender, longer than ventral cirri anteriorly, slightly longer or similar from mid-body towards posterior-most chaetigers (Fig. +8 E – G +). Ventral cirri thumb-shaped with rounded wide tips in first few chaetigers, basally inflated with digitiform tip from chaetiger 15, and gradually becoming conical posteriorly (Fig. +8 E – G +). Branchiae pectinate, from chaetiger 24 (16–27) and continuing to last ~ 10 chaetigers, branchial filaments 4 × longer than dorsal cirri where best developed; number of filaments increasing from three anteriorly to six in mid-body, decreasing to one in last several chaetigers. + + +Notoaciculae absent, neuroaciculae black, blunt, and translucent at distal end along most of body, pale brown in posterior-most parapodia; ~ 2 or 3 per parapodium in anterior, one per parapodium in median and posterior chaetigers (Fig. +8 E – G +). Supra-acicular chaetae with limbate capillaries and pectinates. +Five types +of pectinate chaetae present (types 1, 4, 5, 6, 8) (see Fig. +2 +): type 1: thin, narrow isodont with 7–12 short and slender inner teeth, outer teeth longer, but with varying lengths, present in anterior and median body region (Fig. +9 A, B +); type 4: thick, wide isodont with 12–15 short and slender inner teeth, present only in median and posterior region (Fig. +9 C +); type 5: thick, wide isodont, with 15–18 long and slender inner teeth, only present in posterior region (Fig. +9 D +); type 6: thick, narrow anodont with 11 or 12 long thick teeth, only present in posterior region (Fig. +9 E +); type 8: thick, wide anodont, with five inner long and thick teeth, only present in the posterior region (Fig. +9 F +). Subacicular chaetae with compound spinigers (Fig. +9 G +). Subacicular hooks pale brown, translucent at distal end, emerge from chaetiger 37 (26–42) and then present on all chaetigers, one per parapodium; subacicular hooks unidentate throughout chaetigers (Fig. +9 H +). Pygidium with crenulated margin, with two pairs of tapering pygidial cirri attached to ventral side of pygidium, dorsal pair ~ 4 × longer than ventral (Fig. +8 H +). + + + + + + +SEM images of + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +Holotype UMTAnn 2149 ( +A, B, E, H +), paratype +AM +W. 54044 ( +C, D, F, G +) +A, B +pectinate chaetae, chaetiger 10 +C +pectinate chaetae, chaetiger 164 +D +pectinate chaetae, chaetiger 245 +E +pectinate chaetae, chaetiger 250 +F +pectinate chaetae, chaetiger 265 +G +spiniger chaetae, chaetiger 10 +H +subacicular hook, chaetiger 128. Numbers denoted by arrows indicate the type of pectinate chaetae; 1. Thin, narrow isodont; 4, 5. Thick, wide isodont; 6. Thick, narrow anodont; 8. Thick, wide anodont. Scale bars: 5 µm ( +A – C, E +); 10 µm ( +D, F, H +); 50 µm ( +G +). + + + + + +Etymology. + +The name denotes the type locality (Merchang estuary) where the specimens were collected. + + + +Type locality. + + +South +China +Sea, +Malaysia +, east coast of Peninsular, +Terengganu +, Merchang mangrove estuary (see Fig. +1 +). + + + + +Distribution. + + +Known only from the type locality and Setiu Wetlands, +Terengganu +, +Malaysia +. + + + + +Habitat. + + +Gravelly and slightly gravelly sand (Table +4 +), burrowing in decayed roots of the mangrove + +E. agallocha + +(Malay: Bebuta) (Fig. +10 A – C +), burrowing in the sediments within an area populated with + +Talipariti tiliaceum + +(Fig. +13 C +) with salinity 26 ‰ during spring low tide. + + + + + + +Sampling site in Merchang mangrove estuary +A +habitat of + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +B – C +worm found in decayed root of + +Exoecaria +agallocha + +(Malay: Bebuta) +D +live worms. + + + + + +Remarks. + + +With the presence of only compound spinigers along the whole body and branchiae along most of the body, + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +belongs to the + +Marphysa + +Group B (Sanguinea). Other + +Marphysa +species + +from Sanguinea-group occurring in the same water body (South +China +Sea) as + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +are + +M. setiuense + +sp. nov. +, + +M. hongkongensa +Wang, Zhang & Qiu, 2018 + +(type locality: +Hong Kong +), + +M. iloiloensis +Glasby, Mandario, Burghardt, Kupriyanova, Gunton & Hutchings, 2019 + +(type locality: +Philippines +), + +M. multipectinata +Liu, Hutchings & Sun, 2017 + +(type locality: Shimen, +Taiwan +of +China +), + +M. orientalis +Treadwell, 1936 + +(type locality: Xiamen, +China +), + +M. tribranchiata +Liu, Hutchings & Sun, 2017 + +(type locality: Wanli, +Taiwan +of +China +), and + +M. tripectinata +Liu, Hutchings & Sun, 2017 + +(type locality: Beihai, +China +). + + + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +is similar to + +M. setiuense + +sp. nov. +in having a pair of eyes and the absence of peduncle on the prostomial appendages. However, they can be differentiated by the number of types of pectinate chaetae, maxillary formula, chaetiger on which the branchiae and subacicular hooks occur, shape of dorsal cirri, chaetal lobes and subacicular hooks. Number of types of pectinate chaetae in + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +is five (types 1, 4, 5, 6, 8), whereas in + +M. setiuense + +sp. nov. +there are four (types 1, 2, 7, 8), and they lack the thick, wide isodont pectinate chaetae (types 4, 5). + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +( +L 10 +: 5.25 (3.45–5.85) mm) has more denticles on MIII 7 (6–7) + 0 compared to + +M. setiuense + +sp. nov. +( +L 10 +: 2.7 (2.85–4.8) mm) which has MIII: 5 (4–6) + 0. Branchiae and subacicular hook of + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +occur later (chaetiger 24 (16–27) and 37 (26–42 )), respectively) compared to + +M. setiuense + +sp. nov. +, where they occur from chaetiger 20 (15–25) and 25 (21–38), respectively. + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +has digitiform dorsal cirri along the whole body, while + +M. setiuense + +sp. nov. +has both thumb-shaped and digitiform dorsal cirri. + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +has rounded shaped chaetal lobe in the anterior and posterior, and conical in the median region, whereas + +M. setiuense + +sp. nov. +has rounded chaetal lobes on all parapodia. Finally, + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +has unidentate subacicular hook, whereas + +M. setiuense + +sp. nov. +has unidentate and a few bidentate subacicular hooks present in posterior chaetigers. + + + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +and + +M. hongkongensa + +can be differentiated by the presence or absence of eyes, number of types of pectinate chaetae, maximum number of branchial filaments, and the shape of subacicular hooks. + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +has a pair of eyes but they are absent in + +M. hongkongensa + +. + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +has +five types +of pectinate chaetae (types 1, 4, 5, 6, 8) compared to +four types +present in + +M. hongkongensa + +(types 1, 2, 7, 8). + +Marphysa hongkongensa + +lacks thick, wide isodont and thick, narrow anodont pectinate chaetae (types 4, 5, 6) which are present in the new species. The maximum number of branchial filaments in + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +( +L 10 +: 5.25 (3.45–5.85) mm) is six and they begin from chaetiger 24 (16–27) whereas + +M. hongkongensa + +( +L 10 +: +3.3–7 mm +) has a maximum of ten branchial filaments, beginning from chaetiger 15–35. Finally, + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +only has unidentate subacicular hooks while both unidentate and bidentate subacicular hooks are present in + +M. hongkongensa + +. + + + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +is similar to + +M. iloiloensis + +and + +M. multipectinata + +in having a pair of eyes. However, they can be distinguished by the number of types of pectinate chaetae present, the chaetiger on which branchiae and subacicular hooks occur, number of branchial filaments, shape of subacicular hooks and the maxillae formula. + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +has +five types +of pectinate chaetae (types 1, 4, 5, 6, 8) whereas + +M. iloiloensis + +and + +M. multipectinata + +have three (types 1, 4, 6) and four (types 1, 4, 7, 8) respectively. + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +and + +M. iloiloensis + +have the same type of pectinate branchiae (beginning on the same chaetiger with different range of variation) (chaetiger 24 (16–27) for the new species, and chaetiger 19 (16–20) for + +M. iloiloensis + +). The maximum number of branchial filaments in + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +(TL: 94 (37–144) mm) is six, while + +M. iloiloensis + +(TL: 99 (95–165 +) mm) has a maximum of seven branchial filaments. + +Marphysa multipectinata + +( +L 10 +: +13.9 mm +) has palmate branchiae with maximum of five branchial filaments from chaetiger 32. Finally, all these species have different formulae for MII, MIII and MIV (see Table +6 +). + + + + + + +Morphological features comparison between + +Marphysa + +Group B (Sanguinea) described in this study and species occurring within Malaysian water bodies (South China Sea). The features for new species are based on the holotype, with variation in parentheses for paratypes. Abbreviations: +MF +: maxillary formula, roman numerals refer to number of maxilla; +PR-I +: first peristomial ring; +PR-II +: second peristomial ring; +p / a +: present / absent; +NIA +: no information available. The major differences between the species are marked with asterisk (*). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Morphological feature + +M. hongkongensa +Wang, Zhang & Qiu, 2018 + + + +M. iloiloensis +Glasby, Mandario, Burghardt, Kupriyanova, Gunton & Hutchings, 2019 + + + +M. multipectinata +Liu, Hutchings & Sun, 2017 + + + +M. orientalis +, +Treadwell, 1936 + + + +M. tribranchiata +Liu, Hutchings & Sun, 2017 + + + +M. tripectinata +Liu, Hutchings & Sun, 2017 + + + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. + + +M. setiuense + +sp. nov. +
Source of Information +Holotype: SWIMS-ANN- 18-012; Paratypes: SWIMS-ANN- 18-013 - ( +Wang et al. 2018 +) + +Holotype: NTM W 29624; Paratypes: NTM W 29619 – NTM 29623 ( +Glasby et al. 2019 +) + +Holotype: ASIZW 0000345-1 ( +Liu et al. 2017 +) + +Type: USNM. No. 20114 ( +Treadwell 1936 +) + +Holotype: ASIZW 0000348-2 ( +Liu et al. 2017 +) + +Holotype: +AM +W. 49069 ( +Liu et al. 2017 +) +Holotype: UMTAnn 2149 (this study)Holotype: UMTAnn 2177 (this study)
+Size (mm): +L 10 +, +W 10 +3.3–7.0, 2.2–5.3 +NIA +, 2.6 +13.9, 5.7 +NIA +8.7, 3.912.7, 5.955.25 (3.45–5.85), 2.85 (1.95–3.15)2.7 (2.85–4.8), 1.8 (1.65–2.55)
Prostomium: shapeBilobedBilobedBilobedBilobedBilobedBilobedBilobedBilobed
Palps: reachingChaetiger 1Chaetiger 1 +PR-I + +NIA +Chaetiger 1 +PR-I + +PR-II +Chaetiger 3
Lateral antennae: reachingChaetiger 1Chaetiger 1 or 2 +PR-I + +NIA +Chaetiger 2 +PR-II +Chaetiger 2Chaetiger 4
Median antennae: reachingChaetiger 1 or 2Chaetiger 1 or 2 +PR-II + +NIA +Chaetiger 3Chaetiger 1Chaetiger 3Chaetiger 5
Peduncle in prostomial appendagesAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Eyes *AbsentPresentPresentAbsentAbsentAbsentPresentPresent
+MF +: MII, MIII, MIV * +5-6 + 5 – 6, 7 + 0, 4 + 84 + 5, 4–5 + 0, 3–4 + 5 – 63 + 3, 4 + 0, 4 + 53 + 3, 4 + 0, 4 + 34 + 4, 5 + 0, 4 + 85 + 5, 5 + 0, 4 + 85 (4–5) + 5 (5–6), 7 (6–7) + 0, 4 (4–5) + 8 (5–8)5 (4–5) + 5 (4–6), 5 (4–6) + 0, 3 (3–4) + 6 (7–8)
Branchiae: shapePectinatePectinatePalmate +NIA +PectinatePectinatePectinatePectinate
Branchiae: start chaetiger; last chaetiger before pygidium15–35; until pygidium16–20; until pygidium32; end at chaetiger 28145; end ~ 30 last chaetiger26; end at chaetiger 18115; end at chaetiger 39924 (16–27); end ~ 10 last chaetiger20 (15–25); until pygidium
Branchial filaments: numbers5–106–7533865
Dorsal cirri: shapedConicalConical +NIA +Conical +NIA + +NIA +DigitiformThumb-shape, digitiform
Prechaetal lobe: shapedTransverse foldTransverse fold +NIA + +NIA + +NIA + +NIA +Transverse foldTransverse fold
Chaetal lobe: shapedRoundedRounded +NIA +Rounded +NIA + +NIA +Rounded and conicalRounded
Aciculae: shape; colour +NIA +; black with paler tips +Blunt; black with paler tips +NIA +; brown +Blunt; black +NIA +; brown + +NIA +; black +Blunt; black and translucent at distal endBlunt; black and translucent at distal end
+Subacicular limbate chaetae: ( +p / a +); distribution +Absent; all chaetigersAbsent; all chaetigersAbsent; all chaetigersAbsent; all chaetigersAbsent; all chaetigersAbsent; all chaetigersAbsent; all chaetigersAbsent; all chaetigers
Pectinate chaetae: number of type *434 +NIA +3354
Subacicular hook: shape; colour *Unidentate and bidentate; amberUnidentate; amber to blackUnidentate and bidentate; yellow +Unidentate; +NIA +Unidentate and bidentate; brownUnidentateUnidentate; light brown and translucent at distal endUnidentate and bidentate; light brown and translucent at distal end
Subacicular hook: start chaetiger *26–5830–3820Present in posterior region (No information on start chaetiger)2017037 (26–42)25 (21–38)
Subacicular hook: distributionContinuousContinuousContinuous +NIA +ContinuousContinuousContinuousContinuous
+ + +The other species from the Sanguinea complex, + +M. tribranchiata + +and + +M. tripectinata + +differ from + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +by the absence of eyes. Both + +M. tribranchiata + +and + +M. tripectinata + +have +three types +of pectinate chaetae, whereas + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +has +five types +. + +Marphysa tribranchiata + +lacks thick, wide isodont and thick, narrow anodont pectinate chaetae (types 4, 6), while + +M. tripectinata + +lacks thin, narrow isodont pectinate chaetae (type 1) which are present in the new species (types 1, 4, 5, 6, 8). While + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +and + +M. tripectinata + +only have unidentate subacicular hooks, they begin much later (chaetiger 170) in the latter species. + +Marphysa tribranchiata + +has both unidentate and bidentate subacicular hooks whereas only unidentate hooks are present in + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +The maximum number of branchiae filaments present in + +M. tribranchiata + +( +L 10 +: +8.7 mm +) and + +M tripectinata + +( +L 10 +: +12.7 mm +) are three and eight respectively, differs from + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +( +L 10 +: 5.25 (3.45–5.85) mm), which has a maximum of six. + + +Finally, + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +is similar to + +M. orientalis + +by having unidentate subacicular hooks. + +Marphysa merchangensis + +sp. nov. +has a pair of eyes and two pairs of anal cirri, while + +M. orientalis + +has no eyes and only one pair of anal cirri. Also, branchiae in + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +begin earlier from chaetiger 24 (16–27) compared to + +M. orientalis + +(chaetiger 45). The maximum number of branchial filaments in + +M. merchangensis + +sp. nov. +is six, while + +M. orientalis + +has a maximum of three branchial filaments. Nevertheless, the original description of + +M. orientalis + +is incomplete and does not include certain important features such as the number and type of pectinate chaetae. Fresh material of + +M. orientalis + +should be collected and redescribed from the type locality at Gulf of Mannar, +Sri Lanka +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BB/5B/37BB5BDFD0208A0E1BA027E7F1C66DCB.xml b/data/37/BB/5B/37BB5BDFD0208A0E1BA027E7F1C66DCB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7d3454bc8ea --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BB/5B/37BB5BDFD0208A0E1BA027E7F1C66DCB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Faunistic notes on Cryptophagidae and Latridiidae of Talassemtane National Park, Western Rif, Morocco, with the description of a new species (Coleoptera, Cucujoidea) + + + +Author + +Otero, Jose Carlos + + + +Author + +Benyahia, Yousra + + + +Author + +Brustel, Herve + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +668 + + +69 +82 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.668.11347 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.668.11347 +1313-2970-668-69 +85664079D1214851B030FD2B1342D41C +85664079D1214851B030FD2B1342D41C + + + + +Cryptophagus punctipennis C.N.F. Brisout de Barneville, 1863 + + + + +Cryptophagus punctipennis +Brisout de Barneville, 1863: 63 + + + +Examined material. + +Morocco, Rif, Talembote, +Sapiniere +de Talassemtane, 10-13.XI.2015, 5 exx (leg. H. Brustel). + + + +Distribution. + +Cosmopolitan species ( +Johnson et al. 2007 +; +Otero 2013 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BB/CF/37BBCF72963111857362CC70F7145ABE.xml b/data/37/BB/CF/37BBCF72963111857362CC70F7145ABE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f07ce342759 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BB/CF/37BBCF72963111857362CC70F7145ABE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Clypeoplex cerophagus (Gravenhorst, 1829) + + + + +Campoplex cerophagus +Gravenhorst, 1829 + + +picticrus +(Thomson, 1887, +Omorga +) + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland + + +Notes +BMNH, NMS, UM, added here + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BB/EA/37BBEA5F2F0481D7C707E6B7FCF34044.xml b/data/37/BB/EA/37BBEA5F2F0481D7C707E6B7FCF34044.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cd22ed1752b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BB/EA/37BBEA5F2F0481D7C707E6B7FCF34044.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +The ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Strandzha Mountain and adjacent coastal territories (Bulgaria and Turkey) + + + +Author + +Kostova, Rumyana + + + +Author + +Gueorguiev, Borislav + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8135 +8135 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8135 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8135 +1314-2828--8135 + + + + + +Chlaenius (Chlaeniellus) flavipes +Menetries +, 1832 + + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Location: countryCode: BG; locality: +Arcutino +; Record Level: bibliographicCitation: Hieke & Wrase (1988: 149) + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BC/F9/37BCF9C017F7CFF9172755C8543D9A8F.xml b/data/37/BC/F9/37BCF9C017F7CFF9172755C8543D9A8F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9c48e0f0e66 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BC/F9/37BCF9C017F7CFF9172755C8543D9A8F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Lathrolestes macropygus (Holmgren, 1857) + + + + +Perilissus macropygus +Holmgren, 1857 + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BD/3A/37BD3A758ABA52B6823E29CB41A8FAFE.xml b/data/37/BD/3A/37BD3A758ABA52B6823E29CB41A8FAFE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eead3e8d269 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BD/3A/37BD3A758ABA52B6823E29CB41A8FAFE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +New faunistic records of the family Mycetophilidae (Insecta, Diptera) from Morocco + + + +Author + +Banamar, Ouarda +Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University Abdelmalek Essaadi, BP 2121, Tetouan, Morocco + + + +Author + +Chandler, Peter J. +606 B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN 12 6 EL, UK + + + +Author + +Driauach, Ouafaa +Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University Abdelmalek Essaadi, BP 2121, Tetouan, Morocco + + + +Author + +Belqat, Boutaina +Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University Abdelmalek Essaadi, BP 2121, Tetouan, Morocco +b_belqat@hotmail.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +934 + + +93 +110 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.934.49157 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.934.49157 +1313-2970-934-93 +B6D4D8BAB7D041B781716E08759B3933 +E2CB96C5CE7E51178249BE8A83235383 + + + + +* +Phronia tenuis Winnertz, 1864 + + + +Literature records. + +Recorded from North Africa (Tunisia and Algeria) ( +Chandler 1994 +). + + + +New records. + +Rif: Oued +Kelaa +, 1♂, 1♀, 13/II/2013; Oued +Aarate +, 1♂, 3♀♀, 26/III/2014, 1♂, 07/V/2015; Oued Majjou (Majjou Village), 1♂, 10/V/2014; +Ain +Takhninjoute, 2♂♂, 17/V/2014; Grotte +d'Hercule +, 1♂, 29/III/2015. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BD/40/37BD40E093F154059DC74A1DC6EC8717.xml b/data/37/BD/40/37BD40E093F154059DC74A1DC6EC8717.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..751748585f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BD/40/37BD40E093F154059DC74A1DC6EC8717.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +A synopsis of the expanded Rhaphiolepis (Maleae, Rosaceae) + + + +Author + +Liu, Bin-Bin +State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China & Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0297-7531 + + + +Author + +Wang, Yu-Bing +Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA + + + +Author + +Hong, De-Yuan +State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China + + + +Author + +Wen, Jun +Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA +wenj@si.edu + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2020 + +154 + + +19 +55 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.154.52790 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.154.52790 +1314-2003-154-19 +038823CB84C75FBE8AB28F6028C06FDA + + + + +27. +Rhaphiolepis merguiensis (J.E.Vidal) B.B.Liu & J.Wen, Front. Plant Sci. 10-1731: 11. 2020. + + + + +≡ +Eriobotrya merguiensis +J.E.Vidal, Adansonia +ser +. 2, 5: 563. 1965. Type: Myanmar. "Birmanie, Mergui, Mout Myinmolekat, 1200 m, en fruits", 17 January 1930, +R.N. Parker 3098 +(holotype: K [barcode K000758399]!). + + +≡ +Pyrus merguiensis +(J.E.Vidal) M.F.Fay & Christenh., Global Fl. 4: 112. 2018. Type: Based on +Eriobotrya merguiensis +. + + + +Distribution. +Myanmar (Mergui Archipelago and Taninthayi). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BD/DC/37BDDC4D140DC0D2C405667451DF2E51.xml b/data/37/BD/DC/37BDDC4D140DC0D2C405667451DF2E51.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cda9a760b4b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BD/DC/37BDDC4D140DC0D2C405667451DF2E51.xml @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ + + + +Fourmis du Musée de Bruxelles. Fourmis de Benguela récoltées par M. Creighton Wellman, et fourmis du Congo récoltées par MM. Luja, Kohl et Laurent. + + + +Author + +Forel, A. + +text + + +Annales de la Societe Entomologique de Belgique + + +1909 + +53 + + +51 +73 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/4018/4018.pdf + +journal article +4018 + + + + +Leptogenys Stuhlmanni +Mayr. + + + +— [[ male ]]. — Afrique Nord-Est (von Erlanger). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BD/F4/37BDF435CC255957A421D2A1E5DC3EE1.xml b/data/37/BD/F4/37BDF435CC255957A421D2A1E5DC3EE1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b3abdbb6924 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BD/F4/37BDF435CC255957A421D2A1E5DC3EE1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Floristic inventory and distribution characteristics of algific talus slopes in a specific area of forest biodiversity in South Korea + + + +Author + +Lee, Jong-Won +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-8396 +Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Yun, Ho-Geun +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Hwang, Tae Young +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Kyungmin +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Jung, Se-Hoon +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +An, Jong Bin +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea +ajb8825@korea.kr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-12-18 + + +11 + + +113952 +113952 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 +1314-2828-11-e113952 +5B963235F71B550FA1E3BC1F0E590B10 + + + + +Persicaria thunbergii (Siebold & Zucc.) H.Gross, 1913 + + + +Distribution + +Northeast. +Tuerkiye +to West Caucasus, Himalaya to Russian Far East and Temperate East Asia + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BE/D7/37BED74CDB905620839B54FA0090256A.xml b/data/37/BE/D7/37BED74CDB905620839B54FA0090256A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..415c4bfffb9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BE/D7/37BED74CDB905620839B54FA0090256A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ + + + +Description of 47 new species of the New Caledonian endemic caddisfly genus Agmina Ward & Schefter (Trichoptera, Ecnomidae) + + + +Author + +Espeland, Marianne +Arthropoda Department, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany + + + +Author + +Sjoeberg, Tin +Zoology Department, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 10405 Stockholm, Sweden + + + +Author + +Johanson, Kjell Arne +Zoology Department, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 10405 Stockholm, Sweden +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1893-3429 +kjell.arne.johanson@nrm.se + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +956 + + +49 +162 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.956.51592 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.956.51592 +1313-2970-956-49 +9B9E6A85D8C94794AC84B4D1965C2015 +DE73B9FFE81C556285DDAB038D9FF8CB + + + + +Agmina ninguana +sp. nov. +Figs 232-236 + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Agmina ninguana + +sp. nov. is very similar to both + +A. scopula + +sp. nov. and + +A. hexacantha + +in having very broad inferior appendages in lateral view, each with a dorsally curved ventral branch. They also have a group of mesally orientated megasetae in the central part of the mesal face of the superior appendages. + +Agmina ninguana + +sp. nov. is distinguished from + +A. hexacantha + +by the broader and shorter sternal processes in lateral view and from + +A. scopula + +sp. nov. by the straighter dorsal margin of the superior appendages and much narrower sternal process. + + + +Figures 232-236. + +Agmina ninguana + +sp. nov. male holotype +232 +genitalia, left lateral view +233 +genitalia, dorsal view +234 +genitalia, ventral view +235 +phallus, lateral view +236 +phallus, ventral view. + + + + +Etymology. + +Ninguana +, derived from Mont Ningua, the type locality of the species. + + + +Material examined. + +Holotype +: New Caledonia - +Province Sud +• ♂; western part of Mt. Ningua, +Kwe +Neco +Stream, 3.9 km W summit of Mt. Ningua, on Boulo-Thio Road, ca. 50 m upstream road; +21°44.359'S +, +166°06.009'E +; 117 m; 20.xi.2003-12.xii.2003; Malaise trap; loc#035; leg. KA Johanson; MNHN. + + +Paratypes +: New Caledonia - +Province Sud +• 1 ♂; Dothio River, 10 m E bridge at +Ate +, 6.2 km WNW Thio; +21°35.288'S +, +166°09.070'E +; 13 m; 29.xi.2003; light trap; loc#057; leg. KA Johanson; NHRS; • 1 ♂; W slope Mt. Ningua, +Kwe +Neco +Stream, at Camp Jacob, 3.7 km WNW summit of Mt. Ningua, on Boulo-Thio Road, ca. 50 m upstream road; +21°43.613'S +, +166°06.567'E +; 150 m; 29.xi-12.xii.2003; Malaise trap; loc#054; leg. KA Johanson; NHRS. + + + +Measurements. + +Fore wing length 3.4-4.5 mm ( +N += 3). Total length of genitalia: 0.6 mm. + + + +Description. + +Genitalia +: In lateral view, segment IX narrowly rounded anteriorly, apex located dorsally; in ventral view anterior incision widely U-shaped. Sternal processes, lateral view, with large, almost half-spherical with straight dorsal margin; in ventral view, slender, basal part slightly orientated mesally, bent posteriorly at mid-length. Tergum X sharply pointing dorsally, higher than long in lateral view; in dorsal view, mesally separate, each forming short lobes with almost straight inner margins. Parameres weakly developed, starting at basis of tergum X; in lateral view, bending upwards and meeting superior appendage basally at dorsal margin; in dorsal view, almost invisible, with group of stout, strictly mesally orientated megasetae. Superior appendages, in lateral view, large, almost half-spherical with straight dorsal margin; in dorsal view, narrowly parallel-sided along their length, smoothly convex lateral margins; apex with stout, finger-like spine pointing mesally. Inferior appendages, in lateral view, with ventral margin uniformly convex along its length; dorsal branch orientated strictly upwards, sharply triangular, with very long posterior margin ending in well separated ventral branch; ventral branch curving upwards along its length, with acute apex; in ventral view, with large central plate being approx. as long as wide, with convex lateral margins and triangular anteriorly; posteriorly with pair of long, widely separated processes curving mesally along their length. Phallus, in lateral view, much shorter than segment IX, straight; in ventral view, triangular with rounded anterior margin and pointed posteriorly. + + + +Additional information. + +This species was referred to as "sp. 25" in +Espeland and Johanson (2010a) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BE/EA/37BEEA673EDBD2F00A8BAB155165BB5F.xml b/data/37/BE/EA/37BEEA673EDBD2F00A8BAB155165BB5F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..29adb7e312d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BE/EA/37BEEA673EDBD2F00A8BAB155165BB5F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ + + + +Catalogue of the hymenopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. Part VI. Formicidae. + + + +Author + +Smith, F. + +text + +1858 +British Museum + +London + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/8127/8127.pdf + +book +8127 +C86CFDBF-61D9-48EE-9C2E-325FC0462B10 + + + + +25. +Atta diligens +. B.M. + + + +Worker major. Length 1 1/2 line.-Pale reddish-yellow, with the abdomen slightly fuscous, the head and thorax opake, the abdomen shining. The head very large, the sides rounded, deeply emarginate behind, with a central longitudinal channel extending to the clypeus; the latter, as well as the mandibles, smooth and shining; the inner margin of the mandibles black. The divisions between the pro-, meso- and metathorax strongly marked, the latter with two short acute spines. +Worker minor.-About a line in length, slender, and having the head of ordinary size; the head and abdomen more or less fuscous. + + +Hab. Brazil (Villa Nova). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BF/06/37BF06018C7D5DA7C8EB45EFA17C32B6.xml b/data/37/BF/06/37BF06018C7D5DA7C8EB45EFA17C32B6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f9282ec3b78 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BF/06/37BF06018C7D5DA7C8EB45EFA17C32B6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + + +Inventory of the Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera) in Komaba Campus of the University of Tokyo, a highly urbanized area in Japan + + + +Author + +Ishikawa, Tadashi + + + +Author + +Saito, Masayuki U. + + + +Author + +Kishimoto-Yamada, Keiko + + + +Author + +Kato, Toshihide + + + +Author + +Kurashima, Osamu + + + +Author + +Ito, Motomi + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +4981 +4981 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4981 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4981 +1314-2828-3-4981 + + + + + +Pilophorus setulosus +Horvath +, 1905 + + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +T. Ishikawa +; individualCount: +7 +; sex: +4 males +, +3 females +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2014-00172 | 2014-00173 | 2014-00174 | 2014-00175 | 2014-00176 | 2014-00177 | 2014-00178; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1905; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hemiptera; family: Miridae; genus: Pilophorus; specificEpithet: setulosus; scientificNameAuthorship: +Horvath +; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Tokyo; municipality: Meguro-ku; locality: +The University of Tokyo Campus, Komaba. +; minimumElevationInMeters: 31; maximumElevationInMeters: 39; decimalLatitude: +35.66006 +; decimalLongitude: +139.68521 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: T. Ishikawa; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: samplingProtocol: +net sweeping +; eventDate: +2013-06-15/2013-06-18 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +KMUT +; collectionCode: +IC + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +T. Ishikawa +; individualCount: +7 +; sex: +6 males +, +1 female +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2014-00179 | 2014-00180 | 2014-00181 | 2014-00182 | 2014-00183 | 2014-00184 | 2014-00185; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1905; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hemiptera; family: Miridae; genus: Pilophorus; specificEpithet: setulosus; scientificNameAuthorship: +Horvath +; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Tokyo; municipality: Meguro-ku; locality: +The University of Tokyo Campus, Komaba. +; minimumElevationInMeters: 31; maximumElevationInMeters: 39; decimalLatitude: +35.66006 +; decimalLongitude: +139.68521 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: T. Ishikawa; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: samplingProtocol: +net sweeping +; eventDate: +2013-06-22/2013-06-23 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +KMUT +; collectionCode: +IC + + + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +T. Ishikawa +; individualCount: +2 +; sex: +1 male +, +1 female +; lifeStage: +adult +; otherCatalogNumbers: 2014-00186 | 2014-00187; Taxon: namePublishedIn: 1905; kingdom: Animalia; phylum: Arthropoda; class: Insecta; order: Hemiptera; family: Miridae; genus: Pilophorus; specificEpithet: setulosus; scientificNameAuthorship: +Horvath +; Location: country: +Japan +; stateProvince: Tokyo; municipality: Meguro-ku; locality: +The University of Tokyo Campus, Komaba. +; minimumElevationInMeters: 31; maximumElevationInMeters: 39; decimalLatitude: +35.66006 +; decimalLongitude: +139.68521 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Identification: identifiedBy: T. Ishikawa; dateIdentified: 2013; Event: samplingProtocol: +net sweeping +; eventDate: +2013-08-15 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +KMUT +; collectionCode: +IC + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BF/CF/37BFCFB263705F20991266BBB8173AD0.xml b/data/37/BF/CF/37BFCFB263705F20991266BBB8173AD0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..efe50f26a37 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BF/CF/37BFCFB263705F20991266BBB8173AD0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,280 @@ + + + +A taxonomic revision of the genus Selaginella (Selaginellaceae) from Nepal + + + +Author + +Shalimov, Aleksandr Petrovich + + + +Author + +Wu, Yu-Dong + + + +Author + +Zhang, Xian-Chun + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2019 + +133 + + +1 +76 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.133.37773 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.133.37773 +1314-2003-133-1 +99F75C9803D65C4880141BE7B6589FB5 + + + + +Selaginella bryopteris (L.) Baker +Figs 1 + +(3 +A-C +), 9B + +, 14 + + + + +Selaginella bryopteris +(L.) Baker, J. Bot. 22(Za): 376. 1884; +Iwatsuki 1988 +; +Dixit 1992 +; +Thapa 2002 +; +Fraser-Jenkins et al. 2015 +; +Fraser-Jenkins et al. 2017 +. + + +≡ +Lycopodium bryopteris +L., Sp. Pl. 2: 1103. 1753. + + +≡ +Lycopodioides bryopteris +(L.) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 1: 825. 1891. +Type. +(lectotype, designated by +Mazumdar 2017 +). Dillenius (1741), Historia Muscorum. P. 472, t. 66, f. 11 [icon.] (fig. 1). +Epitype. +(designated by +Mazumdar 2017 +): INDIA. Jharkhand: Deoghar, Trikut Hills, 365.76 m. 11 X 1999. +J. Mazumdar 72 +(CAL). + + += +Lycopodium circinale +L., in Murray, Syst. Veg. ed 13: 794. 1774. + + += +Lycopodium imbricatum +Roxb., in Griff., Calc. J. Nat. Hist. 4: 475. 1844; non Forssk. 1775; +Thapa 2002 +. + + +≡ +Selaginella imbricata +(Roxb.) J. Scott, J. Agr. Hort. Soc. India, n. s. 2: 260. 1868. + + +( +Lycopodium imbricatum +Roxb., Hort. Bengal.: 75. 1814, nom. nud.). + + + +Description. + +Stems 5-25 cm, suberect to erect. Rhizophores at lower and basal part stem. Main stems branched from near middle part, in basal part main stem 1.5-2.5 mm in diam. Axillary leaves slightly similar with ventral leaves, base cuneate, margin irregular, finely denticulate, 2.0-3.5 +x +1.3-2.0 mm. Ventral leaves ovate, 1.5-2.0 +x +1.0-1.5 mm, oblique at base, imbricate, margin denticulate, acute to acuminate at apex. Dorsal leaves ovate, 1.4-1.8 +x +1.2-1.5 mm, slightly asymmetric, oblique at base, margin entire to minutely denticulate, apex acute to acuminate. Strobili rare, solitary, terminal, compact, 3-5 +x +1-2.5 mm. Sporophylls monomorphic, ovate, margin entire to minutely denticulate, apex acuminate. Megaspores dull-yellow, surface verrucate, microspore yellow, surface granulate. + + + +Ecology. +On rocks in dense forests at lower elevation. Alt. 250-1700 m. + + +Distribution in Nepal. +W, C, E. +Nepalese threatened status: not available data. + + +General distribution. +BHUTAN, INDIA (Assam, Darjeeling, Uttarakhand, NE, C and S India), ARABIA, N AFRICA. + + +Chromosome number. + +2n=20 ( +Fabbri 1965 +; +Jermy et al. 1967 +). + +Selected specimens examined: + + +Nepal. + +"De la +Banaouera +Khola +a +Balauta, alt. 400 m. 6 XI 1954. +A. Zimmernann +2077" (KYO, photo). + + +W Nepal: HUMLA +: "Between Danna and Sali Salla (the junction of Loti Gad and Humla Karnali River), dry rock on SW-facing slope, alt. 1740 m, 26 Sep 1983, +H. Tabata +et al. +23629 +" (KYO, photo). + + +HUMLA, MUGU +: "Between Tirthasain, Humla Dist., and Huanglu, Mugu Distr., on the trail in grassland on W-facing slope, alt. 1400 m, 5 Sep 1983, +H. Tabata +et al. +24648 +" (KYO, photo). + + +SALYAN +: "Salyana, alt. 5000 ft., dry earth bank beside track, 29 Mar 1952, +O. Polunin +, +W.R. Sykes +& +L.H.J. Williams 667 +" (US, photo; KYO, photo). + + +C Nepal: CHITAWAN +: "damp, rocky sides of small steam-gully at Lambola Khola, c. +1/2 +km S of Beldas (Satara Kilo) village, 18 km S. of Mugling on road to Narayanghat, S. W. of Kathmandu, alt. 350 m, 20 Jan 2000, +C.R. Fraser-Jenkins 38395 (FN 4370) +" (US, photo). + + +E Nepal: TEHRATHUM +: "en route from Iwa to Majhi, on dry slope along the river, Shorea-Shima forest, 610 m, 29 Jun 1978, +H. Tabata +, +K.R. Rajbhandari +, +Y. Shimizu 11989 +" (PE). + + +DHANKUTA +: "Dhankuta, +26°50'N +, +87°20'E +, alt. 400 m, 11 Oct 1971, +J.F. Dobremez +DBR NEP +1373 +" (E00670572); "by River Tamur, near Suspension Bridge, alt. 1000 ft, 18 Sep 1961, +A.H. Norkett 5094 +" (BM001022383). + + +TAPLEJUNG +: "Tamur Bridge, alt. 250-300 m. 4 Sep 1977, +H. Ohashi +et al. +773141 +" (TI, photo). + + + +Figure 1. +Morphological diversity of the leaves of Nepalese + +Sealginella + +species: + +1 +A-C + + +S. indica + +( +Nakaike 1325 +, PE) + +2 +A-C + + +S. pulvinata + +( +Tabata +et al. +3520 +, PE) + +3 +A-C + + +S. bryopteris + +( +Tabata +et al. +11989 +, PE). A - Axillary leaves, B - Dorsal leaves, C - Ventral leaves. Scale bars: 0.2 mm. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BF/E0/37BFE0F76D0B346C4D3456CADD57CC99.xml b/data/37/BF/E0/37BFE0F76D0B346C4D3456CADD57CC99.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2fe95d3e7b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BF/E0/37BFE0F76D0B346C4D3456CADD57CC99.xml @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + +Coastal Fishes of Sao Tome and Principe islands, Gulf of Guinea (Eastern Atlantic Ocean) - an update. + + + +Author + +Peter Wirtz + + + +Author + +Carlos Eduardo L. Ferreira + + + +Author + +Sergio R. Floeter + + + +Author + +Ronald Fricke + + + +Author + +Joao Luiz Gasparini + + + +Author + +Tomio Iwamoto + + + +Author + +Luiz Rocha + + + +Author + +Claudio L. S. Sampaio + + + +Author + +Ulrich K. Schliewen + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2007 + +1523 + + +1 +48 + + + + +http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2202520B-A3E7-492D-A932-14463CD6DAF9 + +journal article +z01523p001 +2202520B-A3E7-492D-A932-14463CD6DAF9 + + + + +Pseudotolithus senegalensis (Valenciennes, 1833) + + + + +CAS 224126 (1 specimen) from +Sao +Tome +City fish market. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/BF/E7/37BFE7546546D9FACC2EFB426421A9F2.xml b/data/37/BF/E7/37BFE7546546D9FACC2EFB426421A9F2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..330553481c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/BF/E7/37BFE7546546D9FACC2EFB426421A9F2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828-4-8013 + + + + +Copidosoma filicorne (Dalman, 1820) + + + + +Encyrtus filicornis +Dalman, 1820 + + +geniculatus +(Dalman, 1820, +Encyrtus +) + + +didius +(Walker, 1837, +Encyrtus +) + + +montanum +Mercet, 1921 + + +glandiferellae +Barron & Bisdee, 1984 + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C0/38/37C038FF7F7057B8B7740655523B7D22.xml b/data/37/C0/38/37C038FF7F7057B8B7740655523B7D22.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ab26f00b2d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C0/38/37C038FF7F7057B8B7740655523B7D22.xml @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@ + + + +A survey of grassland Asilidae (Diptera) at Jacana Eco Estate, Hilton, South Africa + + + +Author + +Londt, Jason G. H. +KwaZulu-Natal Museum, P. Bag 9070, Pietermaritzburg, 3200, South Africa & School of Biological & Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa +londtja@telkomsa.net + +text + + +African Invertebrates + + +2020 + +61 + + +1 + + +29 +48 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/AfrInvertebr.61.50895 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/AfrInvertebr.61.50895 +2305-2562-1-29 +4B0D39243E014D3A9EDCF6CBA335159F +1CCA7F4D3CB555A98C0DA976F578DA16 + + + + +1. +Euscelidia vallis Dikow, 2003 +Fig. 9 + + + +Remarks. + +This species was positively identified by Dikow (pers com) who reviewed the extensive Afrotropical + +Euscelidia + +fauna, comprising over fifty species ( +Dikow 2003 +). The species was described, based on only three specimens, two from Mhlopeni Nature Reserve ( +29°00'S +, +30°25'E +), collected in February and one from Van Reenen ( +28°22'S +, +29°23'E +) collected in January. + +Adults of this species were encountered in large numbers on the first sampling day and the species remained abundant for the following 11 weeks before numbers began to decrease from week 12. The species was poorly represented during weeks 13-15, before finally disappearing in week 16. The species was not collected throughout winter and most of spring, but reappeared in moderate numbers on week 42. The species was fairly common during weeks 42-47, before again being fairly abundant on week 48. For some unknown reason, the species suddenly disappeared from samples taken during weeks 49 and 50 before reappearing in low numbers on week 51 and in greater numbers on week 52. This species was, without doubt, the most commonly encountered species, especially in the upper field, during the survey, being present for some 26 weeks of the year. + +This small species was invariably swept from long grass with very few actually being sighted. None were encountered mating or with prey. The species appears to be largely confined to + +Londt's +(1994) + +ecological category 4a (within grass). + + +Material from Jacana has been compared with specimens collected during the Queen Elizabeth Park survey ( +Londt 2002b +) and found to be conspecific. Table +4 +provides a comparison of flight periods with those recorded from Queen Elizabeth Park. Adults were encountered at approximately the same time of year and flight periods ranged from 25 weeks at Jacana to 29 weeks at Queen Elizabeth Park. + + + +Figures 4-13. +Grassland inhabiting +Asilidae +encountered at Jacana Eco Estate (arranged alphabetically): +4 + +Caenoura annulitarsis + +(Loew, 1858) +5 + +Damalis monochaetes + +Londt, 1989 +6 + +Dasophrys fortis + +Londt, 1981 +7 + +Dasophrys tarsalis + +(Ricardo, 1920) +8 + +Dysclytus firmatus + +(Walker, 1857) +9 + +Euscelidia vallis + +Dikow, 2003 +10 + +Ischiolobos mesotopos + +Londt, 2005 +11 + +Leptogaster + +sp. +12 + +Microstylum + +sp. +13 + +Rhipidocephala obscurata + +Oldroyd, 1966. Photos: B. Muller. + + + + +Table 4. +A comparison of +Asilidae +collected at two survey sites (species listed in the order collected at Jacana Eco Estate). Jacana data taken from Table +3 +and Queen Elizabeth Park data from Fig. +4 +of +Londt (2002b) +. Weeks of activity calculated from both actual data and presumed occurrence when gaps in data occur. Weeks of activity (actual and presumed). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
SpeciesJacana Eco EstateQueen Elizabeth Park
+ +Euscelidia vallis + +1-15, 42-52 (25 weeks)1-18, 41-52 (29 weeks)
+ +Ischiolobos mesotopos + +1-6, 45-52 (14 weeks)1-16, 52 (17 weeks)
+ +Caenoura annulitarsis + +5-20 (16 weeks)1-20, 48-52 (25 weeks)
+ +Dasophrus androclea + +11 (1 week)18 (1 week)
+ +Neolophonotus wroughtoni + +21-22 (2 weeks)20-36 (17 weeks)
+ +Leptogaster + +sp. +38 (1 week)10-16 (7 weeks)
+ +Microstylum + +sp. +45-52 (8 weeks)45-49 (5 weeks)
+ +Dasophrys fortis + +51 (1 week)13 (1 week)
+ +Rhipidocephala obscurata + +51 (1 week)3-5, 48-52 (8 weeks)
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C0/A7/37C0A7A7DB843C4819033C7EB3C71D68.xml b/data/37/C0/A7/37C0A7A7DB843C4819033C7EB3C71D68.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b39d85ce98a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C0/A7/37C0A7A7DB843C4819033C7EB3C71D68.xml @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Endasys striatus (Kiss, 1924) + + + + +Acanthocryptus striatus +Kiss, 1924 + + + +Distribution +England + + +Notes + +added by +Sawoniewicz and Luhman (1992) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C1/33/37C133EB689DF1FFDCDA38C39F7DD54B.xml b/data/37/C1/33/37C133EB689DF1FFDCDA38C39F7DD54B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f920cf79678 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C1/33/37C133EB689DF1FFDCDA38C39F7DD54B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@ + + + +Checklist of Serengeti Ecosystem Grasses + + + +Author + +Williams, Emma Victoria + + + +Author + +Elia Ntandu, John + + + +Author + +Ficinski, Pawel + + + +Author + +Vorontsova, Maria + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8286 +8286 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8286 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8286 +1314-2828--8286 + + + + +Pennisetum clandestinum Hochst. ex Chiov. + + + + +Cenchrus clandestinus +(Hochst. ex Chiov.) Morrone + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +659 +; recordNumber: 715; recordedBy: +Ellemann, L +; Taxon: scientificName: Pennisetumclandestinum Hochst. ex Chiov.; kingdom: Plantae; family: Poaceae; genus: Pennisetum; specificEpithet: clandestinum; scientificNameAuthorship: Hochst. ex Chiov.; Location: continent: Africa; country: +Tanzania +; stateProvince: Arusha; county: Ngorongoro; locality: +Sendui +; verbatimLocality: Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Sendui, close to ole Senguyans boma.; minimumElevationInMeters: 2650; decimalLatitude: +-2.916 +; decimalLongitude: +35.716 +; Event: eventDate: +1993-07-22 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +AAU +; collectionCode: +Herbarium +; ownerInstitutionCode: AAU; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +660 +; recordNumber: 774; recordedBy: +Ellemann, L +; Taxon: scientificName: Pennisetumclandestinum Hochst. ex Chiov.; kingdom: Plantae; family: Poaceae; genus: Pennisetum; specificEpithet: clandestinum; scientificNameAuthorship: Hochst. ex Chiov.; Location: continent: Africa; country: +Tanzania +; stateProvince: Arusha; county: Ngorongoro; locality: +Irmisigiyo +; verbatimLocality: Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Irmisigiyo; minimumElevationInMeters: 2400; decimalLatitude: +-3.2 +; decimalLongitude: +35.366 +; Event: eventDate: +1993-08-05 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +AAU +; collectionCode: +Herbarium +; ownerInstitutionCode: AAU; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +661 +; recordNumber: 833; recordedBy: +Ellemann, L +; Taxon: scientificName: Pennisetumclandestinum Hochst. ex Chiov.; kingdom: Plantae; family: Poaceae; genus: Pennisetum; specificEpithet: clandestinum; scientificNameAuthorship: Hochst. ex Chiov.; Location: continent: Africa; country: +Tanzania +; stateProvince: Arusha; county: Ngorongoro; locality: +Esongoyo +; verbatimLocality: Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Esongoyo, forest 23 km from Alaililai.; decimalLatitude: +-3.166 +; decimalLongitude: +35.466 +; Event: eventDate: +1993-08-22 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +AAU +; collectionCode: +Herbarium +; ownerInstitutionCode: AAU; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +662 +; recordNumber: 863; recordedBy: +Ellemann, L +; Taxon: scientificName: Pennisetumclandestinum Hochst. ex Chiov.; kingdom: Plantae; family: Poaceae; genus: Pennisetum; specificEpithet: clandestinum; scientificNameAuthorship: Hochst. ex Chiov.; Location: continent: Africa; country: +Tanzania +; stateProvince: Arusha; county: Ngorongoro; locality: +Rhino lodge +; verbatimLocality: Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Entim e Rotian, close to Rhino-lodge.; minimumElevationInMeters: 2200; decimalLatitude: +-3.25 +; decimalLongitude: +35.516 +; Event: eventDate: +1993-08-29 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +AAU +; collectionCode: +Herbarium +; ownerInstitutionCode: AAU; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +663 +; recordNumber: 944; recordedBy: +Ellemann, L +; Taxon: scientificName: Pennisetumclandestinum Hochst. ex Chiov.; kingdom: Plantae; family: Poaceae; genus: Pennisetum; specificEpithet: clandestinum; scientificNameAuthorship: Hochst. ex Chiov.; Location: continent: Africa; country: +Tanzania +; stateProvince: Arusha; county: Ngorongoro; locality: +Irmisigiyo +; verbatimLocality: Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Irmisigiyo; minimumElevationInMeters: 2350; decimalLatitude: +-3.2 +; decimalLongitude: +35.366 +; Event: eventDate: +1993-09-30 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +AAU +; collectionCode: +Herbarium +; ownerInstitutionCode: AAU; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +664 +; recordNumber: 910b; recordedBy: +Ellemann, L +; Taxon: scientificName: Pennisetumclandestinum Hochst. ex Chiov.; kingdom: Plantae; family: Poaceae; genus: Pennisetum; specificEpithet: clandestinum; scientificNameAuthorship: Hochst. ex Chiov.; Location: continent: Africa; country: +Tanzania +; stateProvince: Arusha; county: Ngorongoro; locality: +Armakutian +; verbatimLocality: Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Armakutian, above Alchorai and the upper water tank in Loomyoni.; minimumElevationInMeters: 2000; decimalLatitude: +-3.2 +; decimalLongitude: +35.483 +; Event: eventDate: +1993-09-15 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +AAU +; collectionCode: +Herbarium +; ownerInstitutionCode: AAU; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +K000766339 +; recordNumber: 103; recordedBy: +Frame, GW +; Taxon: scientificName: Pennisetumclandestinum Hochst. ex Chiov.; kingdom: Plantae; family: Poaceae; genus: Pennisetum; specificEpithet: clandestinum; scientificNameAuthorship: Hochst. ex Chiov.; Location: continent: Africa; country: +Tanzania +; stateProvince: Arusha; county: Ngorongoro; locality: +Empakai Crater +; verbatimLocality: Empakaai crater, top of east rim.; minimumElevationInMeters: 2600; decimalLatitude: +-2.933333 +; decimalLongitude: +35.816667 +; Event: eventDate: +1973-03-17 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +K +; collectionCode: +Herbarium +; ownerInstitutionCode: K; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: catalogNumber: +DB0422 +; recordNumber: 103; recordedBy: +Frame, GW +; Taxon: scientificName: Pennisetumclandestinum Hochst. ex Chiov.; kingdom: Plantae; family: Poaceae; genus: Pennisetum; specificEpithet: clandestinum; scientificNameAuthorship: Hochst. ex Chiov.; Location: continent: Africa; country: +Tanzania +; stateProvince: Arusha; county: Ngorongoro; locality: +Empakai Crater +; verbatimLocality: Empakaai crater, top of east rim.; minimumElevationInMeters: 2600; decimalLatitude: +-2.933333 +; decimalLongitude: +35.816667 +; Event: eventDate: +1973-03-17 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +SWRC +; collectionCode: +Herbarium +; ownerInstitutionCode: SWRC; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + +Distribution +Native to Eastern Africa, introduced widely + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C1/76/37C176AD8837B17AC53788D8E3217F48.xml b/data/37/C1/76/37C176AD8837B17AC53788D8E3217F48.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7cc1121205c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C1/76/37C176AD8837B17AC53788D8E3217F48.xml @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ + + + +A taxonomic study of Costa Rican Leptodrepana with the description of twenty-four new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Cheloninae) + + + +Author + +Dadelahi, Samin D. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Scott R. + + + +Author + +Aguirre, Helmuth + + + +Author + +Almeida, Luis Felipe V. de + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2018 + +750 + + +59 +130 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.750.23536 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.750.23536 +1313-2970-750-59 +E60BAC2F51D547888825BD2113035CE0 +E60BAC2F51D547888825BD2113035CE0 + + + + +Leptodrepana conleyae Dadelahi & Shaw +sp. n. +Figs 19-23 + + + + +Diagnosis +. + + +The carapace apex terminates in two small tubercles weakly arched between. Head blackish brown; mesosoma mostly orange, metapleuron with black areas posteriorly; wings suffused with light yellowish brown pigment. The carapace has a baso-medial yellowish white +"cape" +or patch that extends laterally but not all the way to the lateral margins of the carapace, remainder of carapace blackish brown. + + + +Figures 19-23. +Leptodrepana conleyae +. 19 Female habitus in lateral view 20 female habitus in dorsal view 21 metasoma in dorso-posterior view terminating in two pointing endings 22 metasoma in lateral view 23 metasoma in dorsal view. + + + + +Holotype female. +BL 3.7 mm; FWL 3.2 mm; CL 1.68 mm; CW 0.44 mm; CL/CW 3.8. + + + +Description +. + +Color. Head blackish brown, mandibles yellow, blackish brown apically; palpi yellowish white; antennae with scape, pedicel and basal flagellomere 1 light brown and remainder of flagellum brownish black; mesosoma mostly orange, metapleuron with black areas posteriorly; fore leg yellow; hind and middle legs mostly yellow except trochantellus, apical portion of femur and laterally along length of tibia brown; wings suffused with light yellowish brown pigment; venation yellowish brown; basal third of carapace yellowish white with small median area of yellowish white extending into middle third, remainder of carapace blackish brown. +Head. HW 1.1 mm; HL 0.93 mm; HW/HL 1.19; face and genae, coarsely rugulose-punctate; vertex and ocellar triangle coarsely rugulose-punctate almost weakly areolate-rugose; frons depressed, coarsely rugulose-punctate with fine parallel lineation lateral to median carina; clypeus punctate and apical margin rounded; occipital carina complete; antennae with flagellomeres all longer than wide and decreasing in length apically, except penultimate flagellomere almost as long as wide and approximately half the length of ultimate flagellomere. +Mesosoma. Pronotum rugose-foveate antero-laterally to impunctate at propleural margin; propleuron weakly areolate-rugose; mesoscutum areolate-rugose, mesonotal lobes not differentiated from median mesoscutum; notauli indistinct; scutellar sulcus with 7 well-defined depressions, all longer than wide; scutellar disc punctate; mesopleuron anteriorly rugose, medially foveate, foveate groove at precoxal sulcus, foveolate to punctate postero-ventrally; propodeum coarsely areolate-rugose with distinct transverse carina raised into small and roughly equal medial and lateral flanges. +Metasoma. Carapace areolate-rugose basally to shiny and punctate at apex; in dorsal view, apex terminates in two small points visible below rounded dorsum carapace; in posterior view, apex terminates in two small points weakly arched between; and in lateral view, carapace apex terminates in narrow point below midline. +Variation of paratype females.HW 0.875-1.025 mm; HL 0.75-0.9 mm; HW/HL 1.12-1.2; BL 2.9-3.6 mm; FWL 2.6-3.2 mm; CL 1.36-1.6 mm; CW 0.4-0.44 mm; CL/CW 3.4-4.0. +Paratype males. No males. + + +Material examined. +Holotype female: PUNTARENAS, San Vito, Est. Las Alturas, 1500 m, i.1992 (P. Hanson) [UWIM]. Paratype data: 1♀, same data as holotype; 1♀, same data except xii.1991; 1♀, same data except xi.1991; 1♀, same province, R. B. Carara, Est. Queb. Bonita, 50 m, L-NL194500-469850, xii.1992 (J. C. Saborio) [INBio, barcode CR1000-900653]; 1♀, same data except i.1994 (R.M. Guzman) [INBio, barcode CR1001-940130]; 1♀, same province, Area de Conservacion Arenal, R. B. Monteverde, Est. La Casona, 1520 m, L-N-253250-449700, xii.1993, (N. G. Obando) [INBio, barcode CR1001-866000]; 1♀, same province, Coto Brus, Est. Las Alturas 1500 m, L-S-322500-591300, xii.1991 (M. A. Zumbado) [INBio, barcode CR1000-487177]. + + +Remarks. + +Leptodrepana conleyae +is superficially similar to +L. ninae +but may be distinguished by the following combination of characters. In dorsal and posterior +views +the carapace apex of +L. conleyae +terminates in two small tubercles weakly arched between (Figs 21, 23). The propleural margin of the pronotum is shiny and weakly punctate. The mesopleuron is foveate medially and has a foveate groove at the precoxal sulcus. The scutellar sulcus has seven well-defined depressions. The carapace has a baso-medial yellowish white +"cape" +or patch that extends laterally but not all the way to the lateral margins of the carapace. In +L. ninae +, the carapace apex terminates in two sharp tubercles that are deeply arched between (Fig. 64). The propleural margin of the pronotum is rugose. The mesopleuron is medially shiny and weakly punctate with a shallow foveate band at the precoxal sulcus. + +The scutellar sulcus has six well-defined depressions. Dorsally the carapace bears a large oval area of orangish brown. + + +Etymology. +This species is a patronym for Jennifer Katherine Conley, in appreciation for her support, friendship, and ability to argue coherently on any topic for any length of time. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C1/90/37C190CCE5404F1F7AEE7894527F31BB.xml b/data/37/C1/90/37C190CCE5404F1F7AEE7894527F31BB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..45cf5fcdcb1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C1/90/37C190CCE5404F1F7AEE7894527F31BB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ + + + +New Formicidae, with notes on some little-known species. + + + +Author + +Clark, J. + +text + + +Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria + + +1930 + +43 + + +2 +25 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/6104/6104.pdf + +journal article +6104 + + + + +8. +Hoplomyrmus micans Mayr +. Storm Creek, four speci- mens. This has no connection with Mayr's species, but is identical with that subsequently described by Wheeler as +Polyrhachis (Campomyrma) macropus +(Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aust., xxxix, p. 821,. 1915). It is widely distributed throughout Central Australia. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C1/FE/37C1FEF60045DAD581EE25D278D1C9EF.xml b/data/37/C1/FE/37C1FEF60045DAD581EE25D278D1C9EF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5950dc410b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C1/FE/37C1FEF60045DAD581EE25D278D1C9EF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Faunistic diversity of spiders (Araneae) in Galichitsa mountain (FYR Macedonia) + + + +Author + +Deltshev, Christo + + + +Author + +Komnenov, Marjan + + + +Author + +Blagoev, Gergin + + + +Author + +Georgiev, Teodor + + + +Author + +Lazarov, Stoyan + + + +Author + +Stojkoska, Emilija + + + +Author + +Naumova, Maria + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2013 + +1 + + +977 +977 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 +1314-2828--977 + + + + +bavarica +Segestria +Araneae +Arachnida +Arthropoda +Animalia + + + + +Segestria bavarica C.L. Koch, 1843 + + + +Materials +Type status: Other material + +Occurrence: recordedBy: +C. Deltshev & G. Blagoev +; sex: +1 male +; Location: country: +FYR of Macedonia +; locality: +Galichitsa Mt., Resen +; verbatimElevation: +1000 m +; Event: eventDate: + +30-08-2002 + + + + +Distribution +European. + + +Notes +First rcord in Galichitsa Mt. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C2/0D/37C20DECE3FA5637BE19AA911CC23187.xml b/data/37/C2/0D/37C20DECE3FA5637BE19AA911CC23187.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..da426a4f77a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C2/0D/37C20DECE3FA5637BE19AA911CC23187.xml @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@ + + + +Revision of the Exechia parva group (Diptera: Mycetophilidae) + + + +Author + +Lindemann, Jon Peder +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6001-7910 +UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway +jon.p.lindemann@uit.no + + + +Author + +Soli, Geir +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5301-6995 +Natural History Museum, Oslo, Norway +geir.soli@nhm.uio.no + + + +Author + +Kjaerandsen, Jostein +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3104-073X +UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway +jostein.kjarandsen@uit.no + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2021 + +2021-09-24 + + +9 + + +67134 +67134 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e67134 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e67134 +1314-2828-9-e67134 +A1151C0727B74F31BC4B6809DA6F87CD +54EEB1B3D94E5239B847CC1AD9587A36 + + + + +Exechia crassiseta Lindemann +sp. n. + + + +Materials + + +Type status: + +Holotype +. + +Occurrence +: + +catalogNumber: +TSZD-JKJ-111554 +; recordedBy: +J. Emoto +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; preparations: +Pinned +, with genitalia in glycerine in separate microvial; + +Location +: + +country: +Nepal +; stateProvince: +Province +no. 1 ( +Kosi Zone +); county: +Sankhuwasabha District +; locality: +Salpa La +; verbatimElevation: + + +2900-3000 m + + +; decimalLatitude: +27.450000 +; decimalLongitude: +86.916667 +; + +Event +: + +eventDate: +1981-07-29 +; +Record Level: +institutionCode: KUEC + + + + + +Description + +Male: Body length 3.6 mm. Wing length 3.2 mm. +Colouration +(Dry specimen). Head, face and clypeus dark brown; labellum pale brown; palpus yellow to pale brown. Antenna with scape and pedicel yellow; flagellum dark brown, basal half of first flagellomere yellow. Thorax with scutum dark brown, except narrow yellow anterolateral margin; lateral sclerites dark brown; propleura brown; halteres whitish-yellow. Legs yellow. Abdomen dark brown, tergites II-III with yellow laterodorsal area. Terminalia pale brown with MB dark brown. +Head +. Frons and vertex covered with brown setae. Clypeus covered with pale setae, most dense towards ventral side; flagellomeres quadrate, with sixth flagellomere as long as broad. +Thorax +. Scutum covered with brown setae. +Legs +. Fore leg with tibia 0.7 times length of first tarsomere. Mid-tibia with 23 anterior, 5 posterodorsal, 10 posterior and 5 posteroventral bristles. Hind tibia with 10 anterodorsal, 6 posterodorsal and 4 posterior bristles. +Wings +. Vein r-m 3.3 times longer than stem of M-fork. +Abdomen. +Tergites covered with long brown setae. +Terminalia +(Fig. +22 +). Each part of divided tergite IX apically with about 4 setae, most apical seta stout. Gonocoxites with apicoventral margin between GL and hypandrium forming short protrusion, each with 2 very stout and apically truncated setae (Fig. +22 +a +, +b +); GL apex with 2-3 relatively short and stout setae (Fig. +22 +a +, +b +). Aedaegal guides elongate, converging, apically acute (Fig. +22 +a +). Hypandrium with about 8 setae, apical pair not reaching longer than half the GL length (Fig. +22 +a +, +b +). Hypandrial lobe with each branch narrow, evenly tapering, apex acute. Gonostylus (Fig. +22 +c +) with DB elongate, apex rounded, baso-internally forming small lobe, extending interiorly; dorsal side evenly covered with relatively stout setae, except on most basal part and internal lobe; apically with about 4 very stout and apically truncated setae. VB ovate, apex acute, with 1 elongate seta on apex and 3 smaller setae further down, one distinctly wider than others. Apical part of IB with 1 seta on apex and row of 4 setae on elevation one-fifth from the apex. MB short, apex acute, internal margin forming curved acute process, external margin forming short acute process, apex with row of 4 elongate setae, all longer than MB length. + +Female: Unknown. + + +Diagnosis + +Distinguished from + +E. trunciseta + +by the shape of the medial gonostylus branch (Fig. +22 +c +); from other species in the + +E. parva + +group in having the dorsal gonostylus branch apically with a row of 4 stout truncate setae, baso-internally with a short lobe (Fig. +22 +c +) and in having the medial gonostylus branch darkened, apically with a row of 4 setae, all of which are longer than the medial gonostylus branch length (Fig. +22 +c +). + + + +Etymology + +From Latin +crassus +, stout and +seta +, bristle, relating to the shape of the seta on apicoventral margin of the gonocoxites and apically on the dorsal branch of the gonostylus. + + + +Distribution + +Oriental, Nepal (2900-3000 m a.s.l., Fig. +19 +). + + + +Biology +Unknown + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C3/21/37C32168FE1C9D09F8D4B6C8D6D47BA6.xml b/data/37/C3/21/37C32168FE1C9D09F8D4B6C8D6D47BA6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ad348954c45 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C3/21/37C32168FE1C9D09F8D4B6C8D6D47BA6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part P) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +718 +782 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Polypodium quercifolium +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 1087. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in India." RCN: 7876. + + + + +Lectotype +(Sledge in +Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Bot. +2: 144. 1960): Herb. Hermann 1: 39, No. 382 (BM-000621366) + +. + + + + +Current name: + +Drynaria quercifolia +(L.) J. Sm. + +( +Polypodiaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C3/60/37C360F844CB5C909030F0AB4E98D6E4.xml b/data/37/C3/60/37C360F844CB5C909030F0AB4E98D6E4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2182ae6ae49 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C3/60/37C360F844CB5C909030F0AB4E98D6E4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +A new generic system for the pantropical Caesalpinia group (Leguminosae) + + + +Author + +Gagnon, Edeline +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3212-9688 +Institut de recherche en biologie vegetale and Departement de sciences biologiques, Universite de Montreal, H 1 X 2 B 2, Montreal, Quebec, Canada +edeline.gagnon@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Bruneau, Anne +Institut de recherche en biologie vegetale and Departement de sciences biologiques, Universite de Montreal, H 1 X 2 B 2, Montreal, Quebec, Canada + + + +Author + +Hughes, Colin E. +Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zuerich, 8008, Zuerich, Switzerland + + + +Author + +de Queiroz, Luciano Paganucci +Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, BR 116, Km 03, Campus Universitario, Feira de Santana 44031 - 460, Bahia, Brasil + + + +Author + +Lewis, Gwilym P. +Comparative Plant and Fungal Biology Department, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW 9 3 AB, United Kingdom + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2016 + +2016-10-12 + + +71 + + +1 +160 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.71.9203 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.71.9203 +1314-2003-71-1 +FFA8FF9AFFEAFFDABA68757DFF9EFF8B +160340 + + + + +18.7 +Cenostigma microphyllum (Mart. ex G. Don) E. Gagnon & G. P. Lewis +comb. nov. + + + +Basionym. + + +Caesalpinia microphylla + +Mart. ex G. Don, Gen. Syst. 2: 431. 1832. + + + +Poincianella microphylla + +(Mart. ex. G. Don) L. P. Queiroz, Leguminosas da Caatinga: 124. 2009. + + + + +Type +. + + + +BRAZIL +, +Bahia +, in sylvis catingas, +Martius Obsv. 2274 +( +lectotype +M!, designated by +Lewis (1998) +; isolectotypes K!, M!) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C3/CB/37C3CBF58999CBDDD45DE52A63D02E7E.xml b/data/37/C3/CB/37C3CBF58999CBDDD45DE52A63D02E7E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..57dcd38608a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C3/CB/37C3CBF58999CBDDD45DE52A63D02E7E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + +A new Apiocera from South Africa + + + +Author + +Melander, A. L. + +text + + +Bulletin of the Wisconsin Natural History Society + + +1907 + +5 + + +2 + + +125 +127 + + + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16194 +50D37498-A097-400B-AC9A-EAFEC3CA55EC + + + + + +Apiocera braunsi + +sp. nov. + + + +Plate 1. +Male. Length of body 18 mm., length of wing 9.5 mm. A black species ornate with white pollen and pubescence. Head very small. Front broad, white pollinose, but with a broad mesial vitta piceous. This vitta. is suddenly narrowed just above the antennae. The very sparse pile of the front corresponds in color to. its basement, except that there is an irregular row of blackish hairs along the margin of the eye at the vertex. Anterior ocellus crescentic, light-colored, the posterior pair small, situated on the borders of the median vitta. Face short, fuscous, bare; genae with a narrow white-pollinose stripe separating the eyes from an elongate velvet-black macula. Upper part of the flattened occiput blackened except at the margin of the eyes, where it is white pollinose like the lower portion; upper portion of the occiput with numerous black bristly hairs; the dense beard white. +The securiform palpi testaceous, white pollinose, and provided with sparse black hairs above. Proboscis short, piceous, loosely provided with dusky pubescence below, and with a bunch of white hairs behind. Antennae short, black, the second joint smaller than the first, the upper and outer sides of the globose third joint dull fuscous; the first two joints provided with black bristles above, the first joint with long white hairs below. +Thorax short, mesonotum blackish, provided with brownish pollen, except on four equidistant broad white-pollinose vittae, the middle pair of white vittae are abbreviated on the last fourth of the dorsum, the outer pair begin on the humeri and extend back to include the white pollinose scutellum, pleurae entirely white pollinose. Pronotum white pubescent and with a collar of short black bristles, mesonotum loosely provided with dusky hairs, pleurae bare, prosternum with bushy white pubescence. All the bristles of the thorax comparatively short, black; humeri with four or five bristles; the outermost black vittae with black hairs and about six bristles; about four supra-alar bristles present; post-alar callus with three longer bristles; a single pair of prescutellar bristles present; scutellum with six marginals. +Abdomen long, black, subshining, especially posteriorly, white fasciate on the hind border of the first six segments, the white border excised in the middle in front on the first and second segments, and on the third and fourth segments it becomes attenuated at the sides, the fifth, sixth, and seventh segments white pollinose at the base, on the sixth segment the black ground color is obliterated except on the sides, venter loosely white pollinose. Hairs of the abdomen black, short, and sparse, the first four ventrals with longer white pubescence. +Hypopygium large, terminal, valvate, black, Shining, and more densely black hairy than the rest of the body; the upper valves slightly shorter than the lower, the hairs becoming longer at their apex, the middle of the upper side bowed out so as to accommodate a pair of short black filaments; lower valves tipped with a dense fascicle of pure white, flattened hairs. + +Ground color of legs black, becoming reddish apically. Coxae closely white pollinose; front coxae White pubescent and with a few white bristles beneath; middle and hind coxae with straggling white hairs, and each with a lateral vertical row of three black bristles as well as with an apical fringe beneath. Femora. more loosely pollinose, all the femora with a row of about six black bristles along the outer lower edge, front femora with a similar row of longer bristles along the upper edge. Tibiae and tarsi +subshining +, more closely black bristly, the bristles of the hind tarsi long, pulvilli small. + +Wings small, clear hyaline, veins narrow, blackish; neuration normal, second submarginal cell four times as long as broad, fourth posterior cell narrowly sessile with the second basal. Halteres destroyed. + + + + + +Described from a +single +male +taken by Dr. +Hans Brauns +, +January 1, 1905 +, at +Willowmore +, +Cape Colony +, +South Africa +. + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C4/29/37C4291B83640EA1E95000DDB896B71D.xml b/data/37/C4/29/37C4291B83640EA1E95000DDB896B71D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..87a213222a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C4/29/37C4291B83640EA1E95000DDB896B71D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Braconidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Mark R. + + + +Author + +Godfray, H. Charles J. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8151 +8151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 +1314-2828-4-8151 + + + + +Eubazus (Brachistes) fasciatus (Nees, 1816) + + + + +Sigalphus fasciatus +Nees, 1816 + + +fuscipalpis +(Wesmael, 1835, +Brachistes +) + + + +Distribution +England, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C4/3E/37C43E2B010613B0740932290D9FEF9A.xml b/data/37/C4/3E/37C43E2B010613B0740932290D9FEF9A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..89d552ed3b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C4/3E/37C43E2B010613B0740932290D9FEF9A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ + + + +Faunistic diversity of spiders (Araneae) in Galichitsa mountain (FYR Macedonia) + + + +Author + +Deltshev, Christo + + + +Author + +Komnenov, Marjan + + + +Author + +Blagoev, Gergin + + + +Author + +Georgiev, Teodor + + + +Author + +Lazarov, Stoyan + + + +Author + +Stojkoska, Emilija + + + +Author + +Naumova, Maria + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2013 + +1 + + +977 +977 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 +1314-2828-1-977 + + + + +civica +Dictyna +Araneae +Arachnida +Arthropoda +Animalia + + + + +Dictyna civica (Lucas, 1850) + + + +Materials +Type status: Other material + +Location: country: +FYR of Macedonia +; locality: +Galichitsa Mt., Ohrid, Sv. Stefan +; verbatimElevation: 680 m; Event: eventDate: +17-06-2008 + + + +Distribution +Holarctic. + + +Notes +First record in Galichitsa Mt. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C4/54/37C4541BE990CEBAC88D476D38BA4923.xml b/data/37/C4/54/37C4541BE990CEBAC88D476D38BA4923.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..95f12c5116e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C4/54/37C4541BE990CEBAC88D476D38BA4923.xml @@ -0,0 +1,386 @@ + + + +Order Carnivora + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +532 +628 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Procyon lotor +(Linnaeus 1758) + + + + + + + +[Ursus] lotor +Linnaeus 1758 + +, +Syst. Nat., 10th ed., Vol. 1: 48 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +"Americæ maritimis," restricted by + +Thomas (1911 +a +) + +to " +Pennsylvania +" [ +USA +] + +. + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Raccoon +. + + + + +Subspecies: +: + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +lotor +Linnaeus 1758 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +auspicatus +Nelson 1930 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +elucus +Bangs 1898 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +excelsus +Nelson and Goldman 1930 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +fuscipes +Mearns 1914 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +gloveralleni +Nelson and Goldman 1930 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +grinnelli +Nelson and Goldman 1930 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +hernandezii +Wagler 1831 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +hirtus +Nelson and Goldman 1930 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +incautus +Nelson 1930 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +inesperatus +Nelson 1930 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +insularis +Merriam 1898 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +litoreus +Nelson and Goldman 1930 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +marinus +Nelson 1930 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +maynardi +Bangs 1898 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +megalodous +Lowery 1943 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +pacificus +Merriam 1899 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +pallidus +Merriam 1900 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +psora +Gray 1842 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +pumilus +Miller 1911 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +simus +Gidley 1906 + + + +Subspecies + +Procyon lotor +subsp. +vancouverensis +Nelson and Goldman 1930 + + + + + +Distribution: +S +Canada +, +Mexico +, +Panama +, +USA +(except parts of the Rocky Mtns). Introductions into: +Austria +, Azerbaijan, +Belarus +, +Czech Republic +, +Denmark +, +France +, +Germany +, +Russia +, +Switzerland +, +Uzbekistan +. + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +– Extinct as + +P. gloveralleni +, Endangered + +as + +P. insularis + +, + +P. maynardi + +, and + +P. minor + +, Lower Risk (lc) as + +P. lotor + +. + + + + +Discussion: +Reviewed by +Lotze and Anderson (1979) +. Includes the Caribbean introduced populations of + +gloveralleni + +, + +minor + +, and + +maynardi + +after +Helgen and Wilson (2003) +; includes + +insularis + +after Helgen and Wilson (In Press). Synonyms allocated according to +Cabrera (1957) +, +Lotze and Anderson (1979) +, and +Helgen and Wilson (2003 +; In Press). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C5/14/37C514009FACAAA55DCA03A345046A0A.xml b/data/37/C5/14/37C514009FACAAA55DCA03A345046A0A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6b38e66986a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C5/14/37C514009FACAAA55DCA03A345046A0A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +New records of Agromyzidae (Diptera) from Switzerland and an updated checklist + + + +Author + +erny, Milos + + + +Author + +Baechli, Gerhard + +text + + +Alpine Entomology + + +2018 + +2 + + +115 +137 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/alpento.2.28973 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/alpento.2.28973 +2535-0889--115 +C7E181A32C884D14B2A67D49ECBB2CDB + + + + +Liriomyza occipitalis Hendel, 1931 + + + +Material examined. + +GR: +Luesai +, 1800m a.s.l., [ +46°37'N +, +10°22'E +], 1 ♂, 24.vi.2017; Santa Maria, +Muestair +, 1850m a.s.l., [ +46°36'N +, +10°25'E +], 1 ♂, 23.vi.2017; Sur, 1550m a.s.l., [ +46°31'N +, +9°38'E +, 1 ♂, 3.vi.2000; Tinizong, 1350m a.s.l., [ +46°35'N +, +9°37'E +], 1 ♂, 3.vi.2000. LU: Luzern [ +47°01'N +, +8°19'E +, 440m a.s.l.], 1 ♂, 10.vi.2006. + + + +Distribution. + +Europe: Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Slovakia ( + +Papp and +Cerny +2017 + +). First record from Switzerland. + + + +Biology. + +Host plant +Equisetum arvense +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C5/71/37C571F2F26E560C849A44829C1559F0.xml b/data/37/C5/71/37C571F2F26E560C849A44829C1559F0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6e3eca2e967 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C5/71/37C571F2F26E560C849A44829C1559F0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,598 @@ + + + +First barcode-assisted annotated checklist of owlflies (Neuroptera, Myrmeleontidae, Ascalaphidae) of Georgia with the first record of genus Deleproctophylla Lefebvre, 1842 + + + +Author + +Japaridze, Lasha-Giorgi +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-5589 +David Reqtori st. 55, 2200, Telavi, Georgia +lgjaparidze@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Makharadze, Giorgi +Konstantine Eristavi st. 12, 0103, Tbilisi, Georgia + + + +Author + +Rostiashvili, Ioane +Konstantine Eristavi st. 12, 0103, Tbilisi, Georgia + + + +Author + +Datunashvili, Anastasia +Monk Gabriel Salos ave. 120, 0103, Tbilisi, Georgia + + + +Author + +Dobosz, Roland +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4441-5147 +Institute of Ecology, Ilia State University, Cholokashvili av. 3 / 5 Tbilisi, 0162, Georgia + +text + + +Caucasiana + + +2024 + +2024-03-14 + + +3 + + +5 +18 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/caucasiana.3.e117039 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/caucasiana.3.e117039 +2667-9809-3-5 +9FF78A8959894ADD9301BC3F7BE3F2D5 +E84980083BF05173A418C7400B39E17A + + + + + +Libelloides ustulatus (Eversmann, 1850) + + + + +Libelloides ustulatus +- +Dobosz et al. 2017 + + +Libelloides hispanicus ustulatus +- +Devetak et al. 2019 + + + +Material examined. + + +GEORGIA +• +1♀ +; +Kvemo Kartli +, +Tetritskaro +mun., +E of Elpia Vill. +; +41.6462°N +, +44.6286°E +; + +940 m +a.s.l. + +; shtepbraiter; +29 May 2022 +; INat + +• + +1♂ +, +1♀ +; +Birtvisi Natural Monuments +; +41.62°N +, +44.5306°E +; + +1150 m +a.s.l. + +; netting; leg. +R. Zamorski +; +31 May 2022 +; USMB + +• +2♂♂ +; leg. R. Dobosz; +31 May 2022 +; USMB • +1♂ +; leg. +L +. Matuszewski; +31 May 2022 +; USMB • +1♀ +; netting; 96% ethanol; leg. +L +. Matuszewski; +1 Jun. 2022 +; ILIAUNI • + +1♀ +; +Shida Kartli +, +Gori +; +41.9734°N +, +44.0840°E +; + +803 m +a.s.l. + +; meadow at forest; +N. Bulbulashvili +; +15 May 2021 +; INat + +• + +1♀ +; +Adigeni +mun., +Tashiskari Vill. +; +41.9523°N +, +43.5034°E +; + +742 m +a.s.l. + +; meadow at the forest; +Z. Khachidze +; +12 May 2016 +; WGFB + +• + +1♂ +; +Samtskhe-Javakheti +, +Adigeni +mun., +Zekari Pass +, +N of Abastumani +; +41.8224°N +, +42.8443°E +; + +2172 m +a.s.l. + +; jhskevington; +11 Jun. 2019 +; INat + +• + +1♀ +; +Abastumani +; +41.7927°N +, +41.8404°E +; + +1893 m + +. a.s.l.; +23 Jun. 2018 +; leg. +T. Klenovsek +; BOLD +Systems + +• + +1♀ +; +Borjomi +mun., +Kvabiskhevi Vill. +; +41.7780°N +, +43.2394°E +; + +940 m +a.s.l. + +; meadow; +I. Goliadze +; +12 May 2011 +; WGFB + +• + +1♀ +; +Zanavi Vill +; +41.8872°N +, +43.4325°E +; + +800 m +a.s.l. + +; netting; leg. + +A. +Lason + +; +18 May 2019 +; USMB + +• + +3♀♀ +, +4♂♂ +( +Fig. +10 +); +Tbilisi +, +Kiketi +; +41.6556°N +, +44.6537°E +; + +1177 m +a.s.l. + +; meadow at the forest; leg. +G. Makharadze +; +23 May 2023 +; JLGT + +• + +1♂ +( +Fig. +4 +); +A. Seropian +; +17 May 2021 +; GBD + +• +1♂ +; +41.6389°N +, +44.6378°E +; +1166 m +a.s.l.; meadow at the forest; leg. Makharadze G.; +17 May 2021 +; CaBOL-ID 1010385 • + +2♂♂ +( +Fig. +11 +); +Nutsubidze +plateau; +41.7306°N +, +44.7094°E +; + +702 m +a.s.l. + +; artificial pine planting; leg. +A. Seropian +& L-G. +Japaridze +; +1 May 2020 +; JLGT + +• + +1♂ +; +Kojori +; +41.6406°N +, +44.6920°E +; + +1332 m +a.s.l. + +; meadow; leg. L-G. +Japaridze +& +S. Tchkoidze +; +26 May 2023 +; JLGT + +• +1♂ +; +41.6598°N +, +44.7086°E +; +1276 m +a.s.l.; forest edge, tree branch; N. Melikishvili; +8 May 2021 +; WGFB • + +1♂ +; +Mtskheta-Mtianeti +, +Mtskheta +; +41.8333°N +, +44.7°E +; + +558 m +a.s.l. + +; leg. +J. Kadlec +; +18 May 2018 +; USMB + +. + + + +Figures 12. +The distributional map of Georgian owlflies ( +Ascalaphidae +) discussed in the main text. + + + + +Additional material. + + +GEORGIA +• +3♂♂ +, +1♀ +; W +Tbilisi +, +N Naosari +, +NE Manglisi +; +41.7333°N +, + +44.4500° +E + +; + +1814 m +a.s.l. + +; leg. + +M. +Snizek + +; +14 May 2014 + +; +Dobosz et al. (2017) +• + +1♀ +; +Abastumani +( +Lesser Caucasus Mountains +); +41.792694°N +, +42.840417°E +; + +1893 m + +; coniferous forest, meadow; +23 Jun. 2018 + +; +Devetak et al. (2019) +• + +2♀♀ +, +1♂ +; +Borjomi +; +41.8400°N +, +43.3908°E +; leg. +P. Winogradow +; +5 Jun. 1911 + +; + +1♂ +(white morph); +Borjomi +, +Likani +; +41.8324°N +, +43.3463°E +; leg. +A. Wasilinin +; +4 May 1912 + +; +Kerimova et al. (2023) +. + + + +Barcoding. + +A single barcode was obtained from the specimen with CaBOL-ID 1010385 (BOLD:AEG2795) identical to the nearest neighbor in the BOLD Systems + +L. ustulatus + +(Eversmann, 1850) from Georgia, Abastumani (BOLD:AEG2795). + + + +Remarks. + + +Libelloides ustulatus + +was synonymized with + +L. hispanicus + +Rambur, 1842, by + +Navas +(1912) + +. Due to the extraordinary morphological similarity of the + +Libelloides hispanicus + +and + +Libelloides ustulatus + +taxa, convergence at the subspecies level was postulated ( + +Aspoeck +et al. 1980 + +). At the same time, due to the disjunctive nature of the distribution of these two species, some authors raise + +L. hispanus ustulatus + +to the species level ( + +Aspoeck +and +Aspoeck +1994 + +; +Szirak +1998; + +Aspoeck +et al. 2001 + +; +Canbulat 2007 +). + +Libelloides ustulatus + +is a species with a Caucaso-Anatolian distribution ( +Dobosz et al. 2017 +; +Dobronosov et al. 2023 +). Unlike other local owlfly species, + +L. ustulatus + +occurs mainly in forest meadows at higher altitudes. For species distribution within the country, see Fig. +12 +. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C5/93/37C5934724F5555D89A99F274E8F30F4.xml b/data/37/C5/93/37C5934724F5555D89A99F274E8F30F4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6fbb7744cc1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C5/93/37C5934724F5555D89A99F274E8F30F4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ + + + +Sedum formosanum subsp. miyakojimense (Crassulaceae), a new subspecies from Miyako-jima Island of the Ryukyu Islands, Japan + + + +Author + +Ito, Takuro +Division of Forest and Biomaterials Science, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606 - 8502, Japan & Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, Amakubo 4 - 1 - 1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305 - 0005, Japan +896wfbt5@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Yu, Chih-Chieh +CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China + + + +Author + +Yokota, Masatsugu +Laboratory of Ecology and Systematics, Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, Senbaru 1, Nishihara, Okinawa 903 - 0213, Japan +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4620-4140 + + + +Author + +Kokubugata, Goro +Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, Amakubo 4 - 1 - 1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305 - 0005, Japan + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2020 + +148 + + +51 +70 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.148.48957 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.148.48957 +1314-2003-148-51 +B20B6DE0095C5D7CAA6A7CF6C003EF81 + + + + +Sedum formosanum N.E. Brown., subsp. miyakojimense Takuro Ito, Yokota & Kokub. +subsp. nov. +Figs 3A-D +, 4 + + + +Type. + +Japan. The Ryukyus: Miyako Islands, Miyako-jima Island, Gusukube, 5 April 2015, +Takuro Ito 2402 +(holotype: TNS) + + + +Diagnosis. + +Sedum formosanum subsp. miyakojimense +differs from its close relative +S. formosanum subsp. formosanum +in being perennial, polycarpic, and having lateral branches arising from the leaf axils. + + + +Description. + +Perennial herb, fleshy, glabrous. First year stem stout, erect, partly woody, 1-5 lateral branches in the leaf axils, 3-10 cm tall, with lax rosettes; rosettes 2.5-6 cm wide with 7-15 leaves. Flowering stems fleshy, 10-20 cm tall, base ca. 5 mm broad, yellowish green, erect or sprawling and creeping at base. Roots fibrous, sometimes adventitious at the leaf scar. Leaves alternate, occasionally verticillate, sessile, green or yellowish, flattish, ++/- +thick, spatulate to oblanceolate, 1.1-3.1 cm long, 0.3-1.0 cm wide, apex rounded, base long, attenuate, margins entire. Inflorescences terminal, cymes, basically trifurcate with 3 primary axes, sometimes with 2, 4, or 5 primary axes; primary axis 2-8 cm long, ascending, 1 to several times irregularly and often unequally forking, with a flower at each fork, ultimate branches 1-2 cm long, 3-7 flowered; bracts leaf-like, smaller than cauline leaves. Flowers 5 (rarely 6)-merous, 7-11 mm wide, sessile. Sepals 5, free, yellowish green, fleshy, flattish, unequal in size, obovate to oblanceolate, 1.8-4.5 mm long, 1.2-3.3 mm wide, apex round or obtuse, base spurred. Petals 5, bright yellow, lanceolate, 4.6-6 mm long, 1.3-1.6 mm wide, apex acuminate, base slightly connate. Stamens 10, shorter than petals, 4.2-5 mm long, erect at flowering, two-whorled arrangement; anthers oblong-lanceolate, ca. 0.5 mm long, deep yellow before dehiscence. Pistils 5, 5.2-6.3 mm long; carpels 5, free, connate at the base, gibbous ventrally. Fruits star-shaped, follicle, erect, 5.3-6.8 mm long. Flowering in April to June. + + + +Taxonomic note. + +This new subspecies is classified in the sect. +Sedum +because of its adaxially gibbous carpels ( +Fu and Ohba 2001 +) (Fig. +3 +). + + + +Etymology. +The epithet refers to the Japanese name of the type locality. + + +Distribution and habitat. +Endemic to the southeastern portion of Miyako-jima Island (The Ryukyus), on sunny, coastal limestone. + + +Additional specimens examined. + +Japan. The Ryukyus: the Miyakojima Islands, Miyako-jima Island, Gusukube, 5 April 2015, +Takuro Ito 2403, 2408 +(isotype: TNS). + + + +Conservation. + +IUCN Red list category +: Critically Endangered (CR). The distribution of +Sedum formosanum subsp. miyakojimense +is restricted to only one location ca. 0.15 km2 in Miyako-jima Island, the Ryukyu Islands. The population of the species contains fewer than 200 mature individuals. The plant occurs on limestone rocks scattered in a private golf course, therefore, it is not formally protected. In the future, the population could become threatened, given ongoing land development for tourism in the Ryukyus. Because of the small population size (≤ 250 mature individuals) and small area of occupancy (≤ 10 km2), +S. formosanum subsp. miyakojimense +is classified as CR ( +IUCN 2019 +). + + + +Japanese common name. +Miyako-hama-mannen-gusa (nov.). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C5/BB/37C5BBAD6A87ECD6416204D926CF025E.xml b/data/37/C5/BB/37C5BBAD6A87ECD6416204D926CF025E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c7c1b0b2a69 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C5/BB/37C5BBAD6A87ECD6416204D926CF025E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Revision of the genus Megacraspedus Zeller, 1839, a challenging taxonomic tightrope of species delimitation (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) + + + +Author + +Huemer, Peter + + + +Author + +Karsholt, Ole + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2018 + +800 + + +1 +278 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.800.26292 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.800.26292 +1313-2970-800-1 +EB5EC9C8D9804F5ABD9AE48DB4158D59 +EB5EC9C8D9804F5ABD9AE48DB4158D59 + + + + +Megacraspedus multipunctellus +sp. n. + + + +Examined material. + +Holotype ♂, "TURKEI Prov. Konya, +36°57'N +33°17'E +Setravul +Gecidi +1550 m 28 km S Karaman, 3.09.1983 LF leg. Werner Wolf" "GU 16/1455 ♂ Huemer" (ECKU). Paratype. Turkey. 1 ♂, same data as holotype, but without genitalia slide (ZMUC). + + + +Description. +Adult. Male (Figure 133). Wingspan 14 mm. Segment 2 of labial palpus with moderately long scale brush, brown on outer and lower surface, white mottled with brown on inner surface, white on upper surface; segment 3 shorter than segment 2, whitish brown. Antennal scape white, with pecten of several hairs; flagellum brown, indistinctly ringed lighter. Head, thorax and tegula white. Forewing cream-white, mottled with scattered black-tipped scales, especially in apical part; two black dots in fold and one at end of cell; black-tipped scales along termen; fringes white. Hindwing whitish grey, with white fringes. +Female. Unknown. +Variation. None. +Male genitalia (Figure 251). Uncus moderately small, basally constricted, suboval, slightly shorter than broad, sub-basally widened, distinctly tapered to weakly rounded apex; gnathos hook stout, about length of uncus, evenly curved, lateromedially widened, apically pointed; tegumen smooth, with longitudinal anteriomedial ridge, anterior margin with broad and moderately shallow emargination, additional small and shallow excavation medially; pedunculi moderately small; valva long, extending to about tip of uncus, broader at base, distal part slender, apically weakly curved with rounded apex; sacculus well developed, short, slender digitate; posterior margin of vinculum with shallow medial emargination, weakly developed lateral humps, vincular sclerites irregularly oblong; saccus broadly sub-triangular, with broadly V-shaped outer edge, evenly tapered to pointed apex, moderately short, ratio maximum width to length about 1, posterior margin broadly arched, nearly sinusoid, with broad and shallow medial emargination, medial part smooth, without sclerotised ridge, lateral sclerites short, about half length of maximum width of saccus; phallus with bulbous coecum, distal two-thirds stout, medially weakly curved, with sclerotised dorsal and ventral ridge, no additional sclerites. +Female genitalia. Unknown. + + +Diagnosis. + +Megacraspedus multipunctellus +sp. n. is characterised by its short segment 3 of the labial palpus, the antennal scape with several hairs, and by its cream-white forewings with scattered black scales and dots. It is most similar to +M. cerussatellus +(Figure 107), but that species is smaller and has pure white forewings. The male genitalia are very similar to +M. gibeauxi +sp. n. (Figure 250) and other species of the +M. pentheres +species group and differ only in subtle characters such as the shape of the uncus and the shape and sclerotisations of the phallus. + + + +Molecular data. +Not available, barcoding failed. + + +Distribution. +Central Turkey. + + +Biology. +Host plant and early stages are unknown. The small type-series was collected in early September at an altitude of 1550 m. + + + +Etymology +. + +The species name indicates the characteristic wing pattern and is derived from a combination of the Latin words multus (meaning many) and punctus (meaning dot), and the diminutive suffix -ellus. The name is a noun in apposition. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C6/4B/37C64B87308770D3E5019CCB1E61F771.xml b/data/37/C6/4B/37C64B87308770D3E5019CCB1E61F771.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a3d4e805dc9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C6/4B/37C64B87308770D3E5019CCB1E61F771.xml @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part A) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +252 +342 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Aspalathus retroflexa +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +2 + +: 712. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Aethiopia." RCN: 5227. + + + + +Neotype +(Dahlgren in +Opera Bot. +21: 86. 1968): Herb. Linn. No. 893.53 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + + +Aspalathus retroflexa + +L. + +( +Fabaceae +: +Faboideae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C6/BC/37C6BC6B13CE8A9B14802776B49FFFFD.xml b/data/37/C6/BC/37C6BC6B13CE8A9B14802776B49FFFFD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..28246c1e9bb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C6/BC/37C6BC6B13CE8A9B14802776B49FFFFD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ + + + +New records and detailed distribution and abundance of selected arthropod species collected between 1999 and 2011 in Azorean native forests + + + +Author + +Borges, Paulo A. V. + + + +Author + +Gaspar, Clara + + + +Author + +Crespo, Luis Carlos Fonseca + + + +Author + +Rigal, Francois + + + +Author + +Cardoso, Pedro + + + +Author + +Pereira, Fernando + + + +Author + +Rego, Carla + + + +Author + +Amorim, Isabel R. + + + +Author + +Melo, Catarina + + + +Author + +Aguiar, Carlos + + + +Author + +Andre, Genage + + + +Author + +Mendonca, Enesima P. + + + +Author + +Ribeiro, Servio + + + +Author + +Hortal, Joaquin + + + +Author + +Santos, Ana M. C. + + + +Author + +Barcelos, Luis + + + +Author + +Enghoff, Henrik + + + +Author + +Mahnert, Volker + + + +Author + +Pita, Margarida T. + + + +Author + +Ribes, Jordi + + + +Author + +Baz, Arturo + + + +Author + +Sousa, Antonio B. + + + +Author + +Vieira, Virgilio + + + +Author + +Wunderlich, Joerg + + + +Author + +Parmakelis, Aristeidis + + + +Author + +Whittaker, Robert J. + + + +Author + +Quartau, Jose Alberto + + + +Author + +Serrano, Artur R. M. + + + +Author + +Triantis, Kostas A. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +10948 +10948 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 +1314-2828--10948 + + + + +Cylindroiulus propinquus (Porat, 1870) + + + +Ecological interactions + +Native status +Introduced + + + +Distribution +COR; FLO; FAI; PIC; GRA; SJG*; TER; SMG; SMR + + +Notes +Biogeographical Realm: Palearctic + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C6/E0/37C6E06B693438D4E3D9262B7F7E6217.xml b/data/37/C6/E0/37C6E06B693438D4E3D9262B7F7E6217.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..62e31e41c1a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C6/E0/37C6E06B693438D4E3D9262B7F7E6217.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ceraphronoidea + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1167 +1167 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1167 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1167 +1314-2828-2-1167 + + + + +Megaspilus Westwood, 1829 + + + + +HABROPELTE +Thomson, 1858 + + +MEGASPILODES +Ashmead, 1888 + + +MEGALOSPILUS +Schulz, 1906 emendation + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C6/E4/37C6E449EDCB5AAC96987D0B30F1500C.xml b/data/37/C6/E4/37C6E449EDCB5AAC96987D0B30F1500C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1ee7a25b0bb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C6/E4/37C6E449EDCB5AAC96987D0B30F1500C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +The Dolichopodidae (Diptera) of Montserrat, West Indies + + + +Author + +Runyon, Justin B. +Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 1648 S. 7 th Avenue, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA & Montana Entomology Collection, Montana State University, Room 50 Marsh Laboratory, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0271-0511 +jrunyon@montana.edu + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +966 + + +57 +151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.966.55192 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.966.55192 +1313-2970-966-57 +B18DEB582C8F4F95B7EF3BECC9F4D4B7 +9E8EAAF1A28A5D6BA36B2D363A1BA200 + + + + +Peloropeodes frater (Aldrich) + + + + +Sympycnus frater +Aldrich, 1902: 83. + + + +Material examined. + +Dominica +: 1 ♂, St. John Parish, Cabrits National Park, East Cabrits Trail, 15.58564N, 61.47210W, 30 May-7 June 2011, Malaise, M.A. & L.L. Ivie. +Montserrat +: 3 ♂, 4 ♀, Hope Ghaut, 300 m, +16°45.108'N +, +62°12.695'W +, 20 June 2017, J.B. Runyon; 5 ♂, 3 ♀, same as previous, 280 m, +16°45.101'N +, +62°12.760'W +; 6 ♂, 6 ♀, Runaway Ghaut, roadside springs, 150 m, +16°45.449'N +, +62°13.011'W +, 22 June 2017, J.B. Runyon; 1 ♂, Runaway Ghaut, 175 m, +16°45.43'N +, +62°12.89'W +, 23 June 2017, J.B. Runyon; 1 ♂, Bottomless Ghaut, 400 m, +16°45.994'N +, +62°11.497'W +, 28 June 2017, J.B. Runyon. +St. Lucia +: 2 ♂, 1 ♀, Micoud District, Latille Falls, 50 m, +13°49.94'N +, +60°55.14'W +, 9 May 2009, J.B. Runyon (MTEC, USNM). + + + +Distribution. +Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, St. Lucia. + + +Remarks. + +Males of this species have a distinctive long, usually wavy-tipped ventral seta near base of femur II. There is considerable variation in several characters in male specimens among islands, most notably in the modifications at posterior edge of male abdominal sternite III. Specimens from Dominica have the sclerotized lateral lobes of sternite III narrow, but those from Montserrat are broadly rounded. It seems likely that a + +P. frater + +species complex exists in the Lesser Antilles, but examination of more specimens from more islands is needed to assess limits of variation. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C7/25/37C725D793E168033722C1B43F39341E.xml b/data/37/C7/25/37C725D793E168033722C1B43F39341E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e78a91783ec --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C7/25/37C725D793E168033722C1B43F39341E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ + + + +Berlese's Primitive Oribatid Mites + + + +Author + +van der Hammen, L. + +text + + +Zoologische Verhandelingen + + +1959 + +40 + + +1 +93 + + + + +http://www.repository.naturalis.nl/document/148866 + +journal article +ORI111 +0DC6B575-3CB3-41C1-A3EC-850520AE4487 + + + + +Lohmannia murcioides Berlese +, 1896 + + + + +Angelia murcioides Berlese +, 1896, fasc. 78 (7). + + +Lohmannia murcioides +, Berlese, 1916a, p. 176. + + + + +The type of the species is no more present in the Berlese Collection. The original description and the coloured plate, although incomplete and incorrect in many details, can probably be identified when the species is collected at +the +type-locality (Vallombrosa). + + + + +Description and figure lead to the conclusion that the species has the habitus of a +Lohmannia +, but that several important characters do not agree with the generic diagnosis. The genital covers, for instance, are figured as entire, whilst these are transversely divided in the genus +Lohmannia +; it is plausible to suppose, that Berlese overlooked the transverse line, but this has still to be proved. There are two pairs of anal hairs inserted on separate anal covers, just as in +Lohmannia +; Berlese figures, however, 6 pairs of adanal hairs, of which two probably do not belong to the adanal segment but to the notogaster. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C7/F4/37C7F4DCF44B55A484698EC8860EA6EA.xml b/data/37/C7/F4/37C7F4DCF44B55A484698EC8860EA6EA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f68f5f792ba --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C7/F4/37C7F4DCF44B55A484698EC8860EA6EA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ + + + +Taxonomic revision of Telemidae (Arachnida, Araneae) from East and Southeast Asia + + + +Author + +Zhao, Huifeng +Hebei Key Laboratory of Animal Diversity, College of Life Science, Langfang Normal University, Langfang 065000, China & College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China + + + +Author + +Li, Shuqiang +Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-5416 +lisq@ioz.ac.cn + + + +Author + +Zhang, Aibing +College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China +zhangab2008@mail.cnu.edu.cn + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +933 + + +15 +93 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.933.38653 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.933.38653 +1313-2970-933-15 +AE87B5CF9728466BAB056BFFFED802D4 +C7F79558BB375F3482BCEABFB2F5F177 + + + + +The +pacchanensis -group +Figures 3B +, 31 + + + +Diagnosis. + +This group resembles the + +adunca + +-group by having a long bulb but can be distinguished by the bulb being slightly concave ventrally and protruding dorso-mesially (Fig. +3B +) (vs. protrude ventro-basally and concave dorso-subbasally). + + + +Description. + +Body length 1.33-1.60. Carapace 0.56-0.71 long. Eyes absent. Tibia I 1.33-2.00 long. Ratio of bulbal length/width 1.80-2.11, bulb slightly concave ventrally and protruding dorso-mesially (Fig. +3B +), embolus triangular or tube-like. Receptacle swollen distally and globular. + + + +Distribution. + +China (Guizhou) and Vietnam (Bac Kan) (sites 10-11 in Fig. +31 +) + + + +Composition. + + +Pinelema daguaiwan + +sp. nov. and + +P. pacchanensis + +Zhao & Li, 2018. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C7/FF/37C7FF26A3DEFD8F4044920A720BA2DF.xml b/data/37/C7/FF/37C7FF26A3DEFD8F4044920A720BA2DF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bb91e0b7631 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C7/FF/37C7FF26A3DEFD8F4044920A720BA2DF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,728 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Rubiaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/rubiaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Galium glaucum +L. + + + + + + +Blaugruenes +Labkraut + + + + + +Art ISFS: 178300 Checklist: 1020470 +Rubiaceae +Galium +Galium glaucum L. + + +Zusammenfassung + + + + +Artbeschreibung + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: +30-80 cm +hoch, aufrecht, meist verzweigt, + +ganze Pflanze +/- +blaeulich +bereift, kahl. Mittlere +Blaetter +zu 8-10 im Quirl, lineal + +, +2-4 cm +lang und 0,5-2(-3) mm breit, Rand umgerollt und von +vorwaerts +gerichteten Stachelchen rau. +Gesamtbluetenstand +locker rispig, mit doldigen +Teilbluetenstaenden +. + +Blueten +weiss, +weit-trichterfoermig + +, mit spitzen Zipfeln, Durchmesser +4-5 mm +. +Fruechte +2-2,5 mm hoch, kahl und glatt. + + + + +Bluetezeit + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: 5-7 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: Trockenwarme +Huegel +, +Gebuesche +/ kollin-montan / VS, selten GE, VD, BO (Thunersee), AG, SH, TG, +suedliches +TI, GR + + + + +Verbreitung global + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: +Suedeuropaeisch + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte + +(nach +Landolt & al. 2010 +) + +1 + 52-344.g.2n=22 + + + +Status + + + +Status IUCN +: Verletzlich + + + + +Nationale +Prioritaet +: 4 - +Maessige +nationale +Prioritaet + + +Internationale Verantwortung +: 1 - Gering Erhalten/ +Foerdern +Gefaehrdungen +Ungeeignete Pflege Intensivierung der Landwirtschaft (insbesondere starke +Duengung +und Herbizide), grosse Parzellierung Konkurrenz, Verbuschung, Beschattung Zunahme der +Naehrstoffe +auf Boden trockenwarmer Standorte + + + +Oekologie + + +Lebensform Geophyt + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + + +5.1.1 - Trockenwarmer Krautsaum ( + +Geranion +sanguinei + +) + + + +
+
+ + + +fett + +Dominante Art, welche das Aussehen des Lebensraumes +mitpraegt + +Charakterart +Weniger strikt an den Lebensraum gebundene Art + + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl FtrockenLichtzahl LhalbschattigSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rbasisch (pH 6.5->8.5)Temperaturzahl T +kollin ( +Laubmischwaelder +mit Eichen) +
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +naehrstoffarm + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subkontinental (niedrige relative Luftfeuchtigkeit, grosse Temperaturschwankungen, eher kalte Winter)
+ + + + +Abhaengigkeit +vom Wasser + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Fluesse +0 - unbedeutend, keine Bindung.
Ruhiges Wasser0 - unbedeutend, keine Bindung.
Grundwasser0 - unbedeutend, keine Bindung.
+ + +Nomenklatur + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Galium glaucum +L. + + + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: + +Blaugruenes +Labkraut + +Nom +francais +: +Gaillet glauque +Nome italiano: +Caglio glauco + + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Galium glaucum L. + + +Checklist 2017 + +178300
= +Galium glaucum L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2001 + +1940
= +Galium glaucum L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2012 + +1444
= +Galium glaucum L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2018 + +1444
= +Galium glaucum L. + + +Index synonymique 1996 + +178300
= +Galium glaucum L. + + +Landolt 1977 + +2813
= +Galium glaucum L. + + +Landolt 1991 + +2282
= +Galium glaucum L. + + +SISF/ISFS 2 + +178300
= +Galium glaucum L. + + +Welten & Sutter 1982 + +1616
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Status Indigenat +: Indigen + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein + + +Status Rote Liste national 2016 + + +Status IUCN +: Verletzlich + + + +Zusaetzliche +Informationen + +Kriterien IUCN: A2c; A4c; C1 + + +Status Rote Liste regional 2019 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Biogeografische RegionenStatusKriterien IUCN
Jura (JU) +stark +gefaehrdet +(Endangered) +C2a(i)
Mittelland (MP) +stark +gefaehrdet +(Endangered) +C2a(i)
Alpennordflanke (NA) +stark +gefaehrdet +(Endangered) +C2a(i)
+Alpensuedflanke +(SA) +verschollen, vermutlich in der Schweiz ausgestorben (Critically Endangered, Probably Extinct)
+Oestliche +Zentralalpen (EA) + +stark +gefaehrdet +(Endangered) +B2ab(iii)
Westliche Zentralalpen (WA)verletzlich (Vulnerable)A2c; A4c; C1
+ + + +Status nationale +Prioritaet +/Verantwortung + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ +Nationale +Prioritaet + + +4 - +Maessige +nationale +Prioritaet +
+Massnahmenbedarf +2 - Klarer Massnahmebedarf
+ +Internationale Verantwortung + +1 - Gering
+ +Ueberwachung +Bestaende + + +1 - +Ueberwachung +ist eventuell +noetig +
+ +Schutzstatus + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+International (Berner Konvention) +Nein
+GE + +Vollstaendig +geschuetzt +(25.07.2007)
+NW + +Vollstaendig +geschuetzt +(29.11.2005)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Schweiz +--
+VD + +Vollstaendig +geschuetzt +(02.03.2005)
+ +Status in sektoriellen Umweltpolitiken + + + + + + + +
+Umweltziele Landwirtschaft: +Z - Zielartweitere Informationen
+ + + + +Erhalten/ +Foerdern +Gefaehrdungen +und Massnahmen Ungeeignete Pflege Angemessene Unterhaltung von TWWs +foerdern +Regelmaessige +Mahd ab Mitte bis Ende Juni Intensivierung der Landwirtschaft (insbesondere starke +Duengung +und Herbizide), grosse Parzellierung Verzicht von Herbizideinsatz und +Duengung +Kleinparzellierte +Flaechen +beibehalten Buntbrachen und extensive Randstreifen schaffen ( +Oekobeitraege +) Belassen von ungeschnittenen (oder sehr +spaeten +) Streifen zwischen Wiesen oder +Saeumen +zwischen Wiesen und Wald Konkurrenz, Verbuschung, Beschattung Offenhaltung der Umgebung +Regelmaessige +Mahd an genutzten Fundorten Gezielt (wenig) auslichten Entbuschen (Entbuschung und Biomassenentzug auf +Felskoepfen +, Felsen, Schuttfluren) Zunahme der +Naehrstoffe +auf Boden trockenwarmer Standorte +Duengung +verhindern Pufferzonen einrichten +Foerderung +der Ausmagerung von trockenwarmen Standorte Als letzter Ausweg, Bodenabtrag auf geeigneten Standorten (Kalk, Schluff, +Loess +etc.) Ex situ Material Close Mehr Informationen F. Perriat, 2017: Plan de conservation en +Ile-de-France +- +Galium glaucum L. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C8/18/37C8187816CE1FDA7AEE67E8A341AC29.xml b/data/37/C8/18/37C8187816CE1FDA7AEE67E8A341AC29.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1dad6bfe83b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C8/18/37C8187816CE1FDA7AEE67E8A341AC29.xml @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part P) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +718 +782 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Polygala ipulacea +Linnaeus + +, + +Mantissa Plantarum Altera + +: 260. 1771 + + +, +orth. var +. + + + +"Habitat ad Cap. b. spei." + + + +Lectotype +(Levyns in +J. S. African Bot., Suppl +. 2: 105, frontis. 1954): + +Polygala +floribus imberbibus caules fruticoso foliis lanceolatis linearibus acutis stipulatis + +, + +Herb. Burman ( +G +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + +Muraltia stipulacea + +(Burm. f.) DC. ( +Polygalaceae +). + + + + +Note: +Evidently an orthographic error for + +P. stipulacea +Burm. + +f. (1768), cited by Linnaeus in synonymy. Another valid binomial cited in synonymy by Linnaeus, + +Heisteria mitior +P.J. Bergius (1767) + +, is not mentioned by Burman. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C8/65/37C8657577FD7819DA6A8F73F8066B20.xml b/data/37/C8/65/37C8657577FD7819DA6A8F73F8066B20.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..95896902cbd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C8/65/37C8657577FD7819DA6A8F73F8066B20.xml @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ + + + +Histoire naturelle des Hymenopteres. Deuxieme partie: Les Formicides. + + + +Author + +Forel, A. + +text + + +1891 +L'Imprimerie Nationale + +Paris + + + + +Editor + +Grandidier, A. + + +Histoire Physique, Naturelle et Politique de Madagascar. + + + +1 +231 + + + +book chapter +6734 +10.5281/zenodo.9896 +F0A2F4DC-EB6B-4AF0-9BA9-A8F1BB37636F + + + + +10. +CREMASTOGASTER INERMIS +, Mayr. + + + + +Cremastogaster inermis, Mayr +, Verh. Zool. und Bot. Gesellsch. zu Wien (1862). + + +Cremastogaster inermis, race inermis +i. sp., Mayr, loco citato. + + +Cremastogaster inermis, race Sewellii, Forel +, +nov. st. + + +Cremastogaster inermis, race Sewellii, var. dentatus, Forel +, +nov. var. + + +1re RACE: +CREMASTOGASTER INERMIS +, i. sp. + + + + +[[worker]]. Longueur 3,5 +a +4,2 mill. +Tete +a +peu +pres +carree +, +a +cotes +arrondis; les scapes atteignent +a +peine son bord +posterieur +. Suture +pro-mesonotale +a +peu +pres +obliteree +. +Mesonotum +a +peine +subborde +, mais muni d'une +carene +mediane +, distincte surtout devant. Echancrure +meso-metanotale +faible, peu profonde. +Metanotum +sans dents ni +epines +, avec deux tubercules +lateraux +longitudinaux +a +peine sensibles. Premier article du +pe- +dicule assez petit, concave en dessus, +trapeziforme +, +a +bord +anterieur +a +peine arrondi (comme chez le +C. scutellaris +). Second article +divise +en deux +moities +par un fort sillon longitudinal. Mandibules finement +striees +, +etroites +. Epistome (sauf son milieu qui est assez lisse), aires frontales et joues finement +stries +en long. Le reste de la +tete +lisse et luisant avec quelques points +epars +, +piligeres +. Thorax +tres +finement et assez +densement +strie-ride +en long. +Pedicule +a +sculpture faible et +irreguliere +. Abdomen +tres +faiblement et vaguement +reticule +. + + +Pilosite +dressee +tres +eparse +, nulle sur les tibias et les scapes. Pubescence +espacee +, mais distincte, assez +soulevee +sur les tibias et les scapes. + + +D'un brun plus ou moins +rougeatre +, +mediocrement +luisant. Dessus de la +tete +et +derriere +de l'abdomen d'un brun plus +fonce +. Tarses d'un brun +jaunatre +. + + + + +Presqu'ile +de +Sinai +et Asie Mineure. Une +variete +a +thorax lisse et luisant( +C. lucidus +, Forel) +a +Gadames +, au Sud de la Tripolitaine. La race typique n'a pas +ete +trouvee +a +Madagascar. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C8/6A/37C86A57607376B019E1B6EB558F2F6A.xml b/data/37/C8/6A/37C86A57607376B019E1B6EB558F2F6A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ddc0c421ecc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C8/6A/37C86A57607376B019E1B6EB558F2F6A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + +Faunistic diversity of spiders (Araneae) in Galichitsa mountain (FYR Macedonia) + + + +Author + +Deltshev, Christo + + + +Author + +Komnenov, Marjan + + + +Author + +Blagoev, Gergin + + + +Author + +Georgiev, Teodor + + + +Author + +Lazarov, Stoyan + + + +Author + +Stojkoska, Emilija + + + +Author + +Naumova, Maria + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2013 + +1 + + +977 +977 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e977 +1314-2828--977 + + + + +lepida +Harpactea +Araneae +Arachnida +Arthropoda +Animalia + + + + +Harpactea lepida (C. L. Koch, 1838) + + + +Distribution +European. + + +Notes + +Previously recorded from unspecified locality between Resen and Ohrid ( +Drensky 1929 +, +Drensky 1936 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C8/78/37C8784E7066D51F213E85ED0B8C3AD4.xml b/data/37/C8/78/37C8784E7066D51F213E85ED0B8C3AD4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eb0ac6257dc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C8/78/37C8784E7066D51F213E85ED0B8C3AD4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + +The ant tribe Dacetini. With a revision of the Strumigenys species of the Malgasy Region by Brian L. Fisher, and a revision of the Austral epopostrumiform genera by Steven O. Shattuck. + + + +Author + +Bolton, B. + +text + + +Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute + + +2000 + +65 + + +1 +1028 + + + + +http://hdl.handle.net/10199/15409 + +journal article +8538 +AA3AF36F-DAE3-48E6-812F-8A9934C335BE + + + + +Strumigenys lexex Fisher +sp. n. + + + +HOLOTYPE WORKER. TL 2.1, HL 0.47, HW 0.34, CI 73, ML 0.25, MI 53, SL 0.31, SI 89, PW 0.24, AL 0.51. Characters of scotti-complex. Mandibles short and in full-face view bowed outwards, outer margins evenly convex and width greatest at midlength. Upper scrobe margin shallowly concave immediately behind the frontal lobe; posteriorly evenly and shallowly convex in full-face view, not bordered by a rim or flange, the eyes visible. Maximum diameter of eye approximately equal to maximum width of scape, with 3 - 4 ommatidia in longest row. Scape subcylindrical, curved and narrowed near the base; hairs on leading edge appressed, fine filiform. Cephalic dorsum densely clothed with curved narrow filiform ground-pilosity that is longer and more conspicuous than hairs on leading edge of scape. Upper scrobe margin fringed with hairs which are similar in shape and size as those on the dorsum. Cephalic dorsum with 6 standing narrow filiform hairs arranged in a transverse row of 4 close to the occipital margin and a more anteriorly situated pair. Pronotal humeral hair flagellate. Mesonotum with a pair of standing narrow remiform hairs on anterior margin and a shorter more posteriorly situated pair of erect filiform hairs (some paratypes with 2 posterior pairs). Propodeum with one pair of short, fine, posteriorly curved hairs immediately anterior of propodeal spines. Dorsal promesonotum with groundpilosity that is similar in size and shape as on cephalic dorsum. Dorsum of alitrunk in outline convex anteriorly and posteriorly gently sloping to the declivity. Metanotal groove shallowly impressed. Anterior mesonotum with a thin carina above the mesothoracic spiracle; mesopleural gland set in a small circular notch. Propodeal tooth triangular, pointed apically and subtended by an inconspicuous, very narrow lamella. Promesonotal dorsum rugulose to reticulate-punctate. Propodeal dorsum superficially areolate. Sides of pronotum punctuate to faintly punctulate. Pleurae and sides of propodeum glassy smooth, punctate peripherally. Postpetiole disc with faint fine punctulate sculpture. In profile ventral spongiform tissue of petiolar peduncle an irregular, narrow strip along base of the peduncle, its deepest point less than maximum width of eye. Ventral spongiform tissue of postpetiole moderately developed. Basigastral costulae long and sharply defined, radiating on each side of a broad central clear area. Dorsal surface of petiole, postpetiole and gaster with numerous standing filiform hairs which are slightly thickened apically. Lateral margins of first gastral tergite with appressed fine hairs. Colour light brown. +PARATYPE WORKERS. TL 1.9 - 2.1, HL 0.44 - 0.48, HW 0.34 - 0.36, CI 73 - 81, ML 0.25 - 0.27, MI 53 - 58, SL 0.29 - 0.31, SI 81 - 90, PW 0.22 - 0.25, AL 0.48 - 0.51 (7 measured). As holotype. + + +Holotype worker, Madagascar: 6.9 km. NE Ambanizana, 15 ° 34 ' S, 50 ° 00 ' E, 825 m., 2. xii. l 993, sifted litter (leaf mold, rotten wood), rainforest, # 976 (15) - 11 (B. L. Fisher) (MCZ). +Paratypes. 1 worker with same data as holotype; 6 workers with same data as holotype but coded (10) - 9, (21) - 14, (25) - 12, (31) - 12 (BMNH, SAM). +NON-PARATYPIC MATERIAL EXAMINED. Madagascar: Beforona 500 m. (A. Peyrieras). + + +Measurements of the non-paratypic specimen slightly extend the range of the types-series, HW 0.33, CI 72, but otherwise match the types in all diagnostic characters. + + + +S. lexex +and +livens +are distinguished from other members of the scotti-complex by having: pronotum without erect hairs except for flagellate humeral hairs, mesonotum with 2 or 3 pairs of erect hairs, and the ventral spongiform tissue of petiolar peduncle in profile an irregular, narrow strip along the base of the peduncle. + + +S. lexex +is distinguished from +livens +and from other members of the scotti-complex by the presence of appressed fine hairs on the lateral margins of first gastral tergite. In addition, the postpetiole has numerous hairs of variable length in lexex while +livens +has three pairs of erects hairs of similar length. See also under +glycon +for further discussion. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C8/CD/37C8CD5D91568395D597CA2B6D6D17D7.xml b/data/37/C8/CD/37C8CD5D91568395D597CA2B6D6D17D7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..83c731f00df --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C8/CD/37C8CD5D91568395D597CA2B6D6D17D7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ + + + +Cyanobacteria of Greece: an annotated checklist + + + +Author + +Gkelis, Spyros + + + +Author + +Ourailidis, Iordanis + + + +Author + +Panou, Manthos + + + +Author + +Pappas, Nikos + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +10084 +10084 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10084 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10084 +1314-2828--10084 + + + + +Tolypothrix fragilissima Ercegovic, 1925 + + + + +Tolypothrix fragilissima + + + +Notes + +Lamprinou et al. 2012 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C8/E5/37C8E5D772087B56D9532F25A0CBD529.xml b/data/37/C8/E5/37C8E5D772087B56D9532F25A0CBD529.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3dff488e684 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C8/E5/37C8E5D772087B56D9532F25A0CBD529.xml @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Enclisis macilenta (Gravenhorst, 1829) + + + + +Cryptus macilentus +Gravenhorst, 1829 + + +remex +(Tschek, 1871, +Cryptus +) + + +inflata +(Thomson, 1873, +Caenocryptus +) + + +gracilipes +(Gravenhorst, 1829, +Cryptus +) synonymy by +Sawoniewicz (2003) + + +antennata +(Bridgman, 1881, +Cryptus +) + + +laticrus +(Thomson, 1896, +Caenocryptus +) + + +exareolata +(Strobl, 1901, +Chaeretymma +) + + +rubi +(Habermehl, 1921, +Microcryptus +) + + +alboclypeata +(Kiss, 1924, +Hoplocryptus +) + + + +Distribution +England, Wales + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C9/28/37C92820F4839CBC2CE54C9FF1FB3104.xml b/data/37/C9/28/37C92820F4839CBC2CE54C9FF1FB3104.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..25104ddb838 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C9/28/37C92820F4839CBC2CE54C9FF1FB3104.xml @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Santalaceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +604 +606 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Viscum album +subsp. +abietis +(Wiesb.) Abrom. + + + + + +Artbeschreibung: +Blaetter +bis +8 cm +lang, +hoechstens +3mal so lang wie breit. Beeren oft etwas +laenglich +, weiss. Samen +gruen +, mit weissem Adernetz, +Seitenflaechen +gewoelbt +, nicht bucklig. + + + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz: +Auf +Abies alba +/ + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl LhellSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl Tunter-montan und ober-kollin
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subozeanisch (hohe Luftfeuchtigkeit, geringe Temperaturschwankungen, eher milde Winter)
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Tannen-Mistel +Nom +francais +: +Gui du sapin + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/C9/F4/37C9F492D981B97955EB5508D872171C.xml b/data/37/C9/F4/37C9F492D981B97955EB5508D872171C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d6195c00a22 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/C9/F4/37C9F492D981B97955EB5508D872171C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +A taxonomic guide to the brittle-stars (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea) from the State of Paraiba continental shelf, Northeastern Brazil + + + +Author + +Gondim, Anne I. + + + +Author + +Alonso, Carmen + + + +Author + +Dias, Thelma L. P. + + + +Author + +Manso, Cynthia L. C. + + + +Author + +Christoffersen, Martin L. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +307 + + +45 +96 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.307.4673 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.307.4673 +1313-2970-307-45 + + + + +Ophiocoma echinata (Lamarck, 1816) +Figure 11 +a-e +, 14d + + + +Description. +Disk circular to pentagonal (dd = 3.06 to 16.68 mm). Uniformly covered by small granules (Fig. 11a), which are smaller in central region than in marginal region. These granules occupy a v-shaped area on the ventral interradius (Fig. 11b). In the areas without granules there are large and imbricating scales. Bursal slits enlarged, with well developed genital scales in margins (Fig. 11b). Oral shields large and rectangular, proximal margin slightly rounded (Fig. 11c). Adoral shields small, almost totally covered by oral shield. Four oral papillae on each side of jaw angle (Fig. 11c). Two proximal papillae slightly cylindrical and subequal, two distal papillae longer and broader. Cluster of well developed dental papillae on apex of jaw (Fig. 11c). Dorsal arm plate longer than wide, fan-shaped (Fig. 11d). Ventral arm plate longer than wide, octogonal, with distal margin slightly convex (Fig. 11e). Two tentacle scales, internal one slightly larger than external one. Three or four arm spines alternating on arm segments. Dorsal spine longer and broader (bottle-shaped) (Fig. 11d), median ones of equal size and ventral one smaller and slightly flattened. + + +Figure 11. Species of the family +Ophiocomidae +. +Ophiocoma echinata +A dorsal view B ventral view, detail of the genital scale (gs) C jaw D dorsal view of the arms E ventral view of the arms. +Ophiocoma wendtii +F dorsal view G ventral view H jaw I dorsal view of the arms J ventral view of the arms. Scale bar = 1 mm. + + + + +Distribution. + +Bermuda, Florida and the islands off southern Florida, the Bahamas, the Antilles, the Mexican Caribbean, Belize, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, and Brazil ( +Lyman 1865 +, +H.L. Clark 1933 +, +Hendler et al. 1995 +, + +Duran-Gonzales +et al. 2005 + +, +Alvarado et al. 2008 +). In Brazil from +Ceara +( +Albuquerque 1986 +), +Paraiba +( +Rathbun 1879 +), Pernambuco ( +Tommasi 1970 +), Alagoas ( +Miranda et al. 2012 +), Bahia ( +Tommasi 1970 +), and Rio de Janeiro ( +Manso 1993 +). Intertidal to 24m. Recorded herein between 10 and 34m. + + + +Remarks. + +This species has diurnal habits. It lives in reef zones, seagrass beds, mangroves, being particularly abundant under rocks ( +Hendler et al. 1995 +). It is frequently recorded together with +Ophiocoma pumila +Luetken +, 1856, +Ophiocoma wendtii +and +Ophioderma appressa +, although it has an agressive defensive reaction and competes for space with +Ophiocoma wendtii +( +Side and Woodley 1985 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CA/1F/37CA1F39837752BD9E2D95771B196CE1.xml b/data/37/CA/1F/37CA1F39837752BD9E2D95771B196CE1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..16e590ef6da --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CA/1F/37CA1F39837752BD9E2D95771B196CE1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Floristic inventory and distribution characteristics of algific talus slopes in a specific area of forest biodiversity in South Korea + + + +Author + +Lee, Jong-Won +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-8396 +Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Yun, Ho-Geun +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Hwang, Tae Young +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Kyungmin +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Jung, Se-Hoon +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +An, Jong Bin +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea +ajb8825@korea.kr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-12-18 + + +11 + + +113952 +113952 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 +1314-2828-11-e113952 +5B963235F71B550FA1E3BC1F0E590B10 + + + + +Primula jesoana Miq., 1867 + + + +Distribution +Primorye to East China and Korea, North & Central Japan + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CA/71/37CA71969C4C58A1B88CFAB17567D029.xml b/data/37/CA/71/37CA71969C4C58A1B88CFAB17567D029.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74b0a4dde11 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CA/71/37CA71969C4C58A1B88CFAB17567D029.xml @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ + + + +Thirty-two new and noteworthy floristic records from north-eastern Greece + + + +Author + +Doumas, Panayiotis +8 th Elementary School, Xanthi, Greece + + + +Author + +Goula, Katerina +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-3570 +Section of Ecology & Systematics, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece + + + +Author + +Constantinidis, Theophanis +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9704-3864 +Section of Ecology & Systematics, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece +constgr@biol.uoa.gr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2022 + +2022-04-21 + + +10 + + +81817 +81817 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e81817 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e81817 +1314-2828-10-e81817 +9EB8F6531659569FAFD439D5B5EAB079 + + + + +Polygonatum hirtum (Poir.) Pursh + + + + +Polygonatum hirtum +(Poir.) Pursh in Fl. Amer. Sept. 1: 234 (1813) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: + +Other material +. + +Occurrence +: + +recordedBy: +P. Doumas +; + +Taxon +: + +scientificName: +Polygonatum +hirtum; family: +Convallariaceae +; genus: +Polygonatum +; specificEpithet: hirtum; taxonRank: species; + +Location +: + +continent: +Europe +; country: +Greece +; stateProvince: +Nomos Xanthis +; verbatimLocality: +Mt. Achladovouno +, the north-eastern slopes; verbatimElevation: + + +606 m + + +; verbatimLatitude: 41°11′; verbatimLongitude: 24°48′; + +Identification +: + +identifiedBy: + +P. Doumas +& +K. Goula + +; + +Event +: + +eventDate: +16 May 2021 +; habitat: deciduous forest with +Carpinus +orientalis, limestone; + +Record Level +: + +collectionID: 25; institutionCode: ATHU; basisOfRecord: +Specimen + + + + + +Taxon discussion + +An uncommon and local species in Greece, recorded from the floristic regions of North Central (NC) and North East (NE; +Dimopoulos et al. 2013 +). This new locality on Mt. Achladovouno is probably the easternmost known so far. Other + +Polygonatum hirtum + +collections from NE include the Nomos of Chalkidiki (a.n. 1390619 LD), Serres (a.n. 10 0234511, 10 0234512 B) and Kilkis (a.n. 1324835 LD, JACQ-ID 825194, B). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CA/8B/37CA8B995C428880FED6C2041618D4D8.xml b/data/37/CA/8B/37CA8B995C428880FED6C2041618D4D8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b5d24d35861 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CA/8B/37CA8B995C428880FED6C2041618D4D8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,561 @@ + + + +Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification + + + +Author + +Bruneau, Anne +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-0796 +Institut de recherche en biologie vegetale and Departement de Sciences biologiques, Universite de Montreal, 4101 Sherbrooke E., Montreal (QC) H 1 X 2 B 2, Canada +anne.bruneau@umontreal.ca + + + +Author + +de Queiroz, Luciano Paganucci +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-0939 +Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Av. Transnordestina s / n, Campus, Novo Horizonte. 44036 - 900, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil + + + +Author + +Ringelberg, Jens J. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-5210 +Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland & School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Old College, South Bridge, Edinburgh EH 8 9 YL, UK + + + +Author + +Borges, Leonardo M. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9269-7316 +Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos, Departamento de Botanica, Rodovia Washington Luis, Km 235, 13565 - 905, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Bortoluzzi, Roseli Lopes da Costa +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7445-7244 +Programa de Pos-graduacao em Producao Vegetal, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciencias Agroveterinarias, Avenida Luiz de Camoes 2090, 88520 - 000, Lages, Santa Catarina, Brazil + + + +Author + +Brown, Gillian K. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7940-5435 +Queensland Herbarium and Biodiversity Science, Department of Environment and Science, Toowong, Queensland, 4066, Australia + + + +Author + +Cardoso, Domingos B. O. S. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7072-2656 +Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botanico do Rio de Janeiro, Pacheco Leao 915, 22460 - 030, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil & Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Biodiversidade e Evolucao (PPGBioEvo), Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Bahia (UFBA), Rua Barao de Jeremoabo, s. n., Ondina, 40170 - 115, Salvador, BA, Brazil + + + +Author + +Clark, Ruth P. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9974-2933 +Accelerated Taxonomy Department, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, TW 9 3 AE, UK + + + +Author + +Conceicao, Adilva de Souza +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8800-422X +Programa de Pos-graduacao em Diversidade Vegetal, Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Herbario HUNEB, Campus VIII, Rua do Gangorra 503, 48608 - 240, Paulo Afonso, Bahia, Brazil + + + +Author + +Cota, Matheus Martins Teixeira +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0654-7501 +Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Av. Transnordestina s / n, Campus, Novo Horizonte. 44036 - 900, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil + + + +Author + +Demeulenaere, Else +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1815-3051 +Center for Island Sustainability and Sea Grant, University of Guam, UOG Station, Mangilao, 96923, Guam + + + +Author + +de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1707-4121 +Centro de Investigacion Cientifica de Yucatan, A. C. (CICY), Calle 43 No. 130 x 32 y 34, Chuburna de Hidalgo; CP 97205, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico + + + +Author + +Ebinger, John E. +Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, IL 61920, USA + + + +Author + +Ferm, Julia +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8762-3942 +Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, 10691, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden + + + +Author + +Fonseca-Cortes, Andres +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7207-9940 +Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Av. Transnordestina s / n, Campus, Novo Horizonte. 44036 - 900, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil + + + +Author + +Gagnon, Edeline +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3212-9688 +Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road, Guelph (ON) N 1 G 2 W 1, Canada & Chair of Phytopathology, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany & Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20 A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH 3 5 LR, UK + + + +Author + +Grether, Rosaura +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2673-665X +Departamento de Biologia, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Apdo. Postal 55 - 535, 09340 Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico + + + +Author + +Guerra, Ethiene +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-1717 +Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Botanica, Av. Bento Goncalves 9500, Bloco IV - Predio 43433, Porto Alegre, RS, 91501 - 970, Brazil + + + +Author + +Haston, Elspeth +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9144-2848 +Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20 A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH 3 5 LR, UK + + + +Author + +Herendeen, Patrick S. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2657-8671 +Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road, Glencoe, IL 60022, USA + + + +Author + +Hernandez, Hector M. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1741-5515 +Departamento de Botanica, Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Cd. Universitaria, 04510 Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico + + + +Author + +Hopkins, Helen C. F. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4984-8224 +Accelerated Taxonomy Department, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, TW 9 3 AE, UK + + + +Author + +Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Isau +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4153-5875 +Herbario Alwyn Gentry (HAG), Universidad Nacional Amazonica de Madre de Dios (UNAMAD), AV. Jorge Chavez N ° 1160, Madre de Dios, Peru + + + +Author + +Hughes, Colin E. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9701-0699 +Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Ickert-Bond, Stefanie M. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8198-8898 +Department of Biology & Wildlife & Herbarium (ALA) at the University of Alaska Museum of the North, University of Alaska Fairbanks, P. O. Box 756960, Fairbanks AK 99775 - 6960, USA + + + +Author + +Iganci, Joao +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5740-3666 +Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Botanica, Av. Bento Goncalves 9500, Bloco IV - Predio 43433, Porto Alegre, RS, 91501 - 970, Brazil & Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Fisiologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Instituto de Biologia, Campus Universitario Capao do Leao, Passeio Andre Dreyfus, Departamento de Botanica, Predio 21, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, 96010 - 900, Brazil + + + +Author + +Koenen, Erik J. M. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4825-4339 +Evolutionary Biology & Ecology, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Faculte des Sciences, Campus du Solbosch - CP 160 / 12, Avenue F. D. Roosevelt, 50, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium + + + +Author + +Lewis, Gwilym P. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2599-4577 +Accelerated Taxonomy Department, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, TW 9 3 AE, UK + + + +Author + +de Lima, Haroldo Cavalcante +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-670X +Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botanico do Rio de Janeiro, Pacheco Leao 915, 22460 - 030, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil & Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlantica / INMA-MCTI, Av. Jose Ruschi, 4, Centro, 29650 - 000, Santa Teresa, Espirito Santo, Brazil + + + +Author + +de Lima, Alexandre Gibau +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9168-2507 +Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botanico do Rio de Janeiro, Pacheco Leao 915, 22460 - 030, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil & Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden + + + +Author + +Luckow, Melissa +https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2543-0516 +School of Integrative Plant Science, Plant Biology Section, Cornell University, 215 Garden Avenue, Roberts Hall 260, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA + + + +Author + +Marazzi, Brigitte +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3252-5816 +Natural History Museum of Canton Ticino, Viale C. Cattaneo 4, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Maslin, Bruce R. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3039-0973 +Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia, 6983, Australia & Singapore Herbarium, 1 Cluny Road, Singapore, Singapore + + + +Author + +Morales, Matias +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-9725 +Instituto de Recursos Biologicos, CIRN-CNIA, INTA. N. Repetto & Los Reseros s. n., Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina & Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290 (C 1425 FQB), Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Morim, Marli Pires +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0872-8429 +Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botanico do Rio de Janeiro, Pacheco Leao 915, 22460 - 030, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Murphy, Daniel J. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8358-363X +Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia + + + +Author + +O'Donnell, Shawn A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0731-7425 +Geography and Environmental Sciences, Northumbria University, Ellison Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE 1 8 ST, UK + + + +Author + +Oliveira, Filipe Gomes +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0244-3262 +Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Av. Transnordestina s / n, Campus, Novo Horizonte. 44036 - 900, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil + + + +Author + +Oliveira, Ana Carla da Silva +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7042-5360 +Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Av. Transnordestina s / n, Campus, Novo Horizonte. 44036 - 900, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil + + + +Author + +Rando, Juliana Gastaldello +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3714-8231 +Programa de Pos-graduacao em Ciencias Ambientais, Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia, Rua Professor Jose Seabra Lemos 316, 47800 - 021, Barreiras, Bahia, Brazil + + + +Author + +Ribeiro, Petala Gomes +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0070-9971 +Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Av. Transnordestina s / n, Campus, Novo Horizonte. 44036 - 900, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil + + + +Author + +Ribeiro, Carolina Lima +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9508-2894 +Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Av. Transnordestina s / n, Campus, Novo Horizonte. 44036 - 900, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos, Felipe da Silva +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1068-0578 +Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Av. Transnordestina s / n, Campus, Novo Horizonte. 44036 - 900, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil + + + +Author + +Seigler, David S. +https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5177-5893 +Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA + + + +Author + +da Silva, Guilherme Sousa +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4250-0017 +Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 13083 - 876, Sao Paulo / SP, Brazil + + + +Author + +Simon, Marcelo F. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5732-1716 +Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (Embrapa) Recursos Geneticos e Biotecnologia, Parque Estacao Biologica, Caixa Postal 02372, 70770 - 917, Brasilia / DF, Brazil + + + +Author + +Soares, Marcos Vinicius Batista +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2660-1771 +Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Botanica, Av. Bento Goncalves 9500, Bloco IV - Predio 43433, Porto Alegre, RS, 91501 - 970, Brazil + + + +Author + +Terra, Vanessa +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5669-1304 +Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 97105 - 900, Santa Maria / RS, Brazil + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2024 + +2024-04-03 + + +240 + + +1 +552 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716 +1314-2003-240-1 +B699D9DE2B435B1093DE3C38C703D430 + + + + +Denisophytum R. Vig., Notul. Syst. (Paris) 13(4): 349. 1948. + + + + +Fig. 54 + + + + +Type +. + + + +Denisophytum madagascariense + +R. Vig. + + + +Description. + +Shrubs or small trees, armed with straight or curved, deflexed prickles, scattered along shoots and in pairs at the petiole base (except + +D. madagascariense + +which is unarmed). +Stipules +minute, or foliaceous and conspicuous, caducous or persistent. +Leaves +bipinnate, pinnae in 1-6 opposite pairs; leaflets 2-10 (11) opposite pairs per pinna. +Inflorescence +a terminal or axillary raceme. +Flowers +bisexual, zygomorphic; a short hypanthium persistent at the pedicel apex as the fruit matures; sepals 5, caducous, lower sepal cucullate and covering the other 4 sepals in bud; petals 5, free, yellow, the median petal sometimes with red markings on the inner face of the blade; stamens 10, free, filaments pubescent and eglandular; ovary glabrous. +Fruits +coriaceous, laterally compressed (inflated in + +D. madagascariense + +), glabrous, eglandular, stipitate legumes, elastically dehiscent, with twisting valves. +Seeds +laterally compressed. + + + +Chromosome number. + +2 +n += 24 [ + +D. pauciflorum + +(Griseb.) Gagnon & G.P. Lewis] ( +Darlington and Wylie 1956 +). + + + +Included species and geographic distribution. + +Nine taxa in eight species. Three species are distributed in Mexico, Florida, and the Caribbean, one species is endemic to Paraguay, Bolivia, and Argentina, one is endemic to northern Madagascar, and the other three occur in northern Kenya, Somalia, and Arabia (Fig. +54 +). + + + +Figure 54. +Distribution of + +Denisophytum + +based on quality-controlled digitised herbarium records. See Suppl. material 1 for the source of occurrence data. + + + + +Ecology. +Low deciduous seasonally dry tropical woodlands or scrublands, also in open pine woodlands, coastal plains and foothills. Species in Madagascar and Africa grow in limestone soils. + + +Etymology. + +It has been hypothesised that + +Denisophytum + +honours Marcel Denis, a botanist with expertise in the genus + +Euphorbia + +L. in Madagascar, and a friend and collaborator of +Rene +Viguier, the genus author ( +Gagnon et al. 2016 +). + + + +Human uses. +Unknown. + + +Notes. + +An evaluation of species limits is needed for this genus. It has a highly disjunct trans-continental distribution typical of lineages occupying the succulent biome sensu +Schrire et al. (2005b) +. + + + +Taxonomic references. + +Barreto +Valdes +(2013); +Brenan (1967) +; +Britton and Rose (1930) +; +Burkart (1936) +; +Capuron (1967) +; Du Puy and Rabevohitra (2002); +Gagnon et al. (2016) +; +Roti-Michelozzi (1957) +; +Thulin (1983 +, +1993 +); +Ulibarri (1996) +; +Viguier (1949) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CA/D7/37CAD7618F2248195014C96156E3BEF0.xml b/data/37/CA/D7/37CAD7618F2248195014C96156E3BEF0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..63ca7e54554 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CA/D7/37CAD7618F2248195014C96156E3BEF0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ + + + +An annotated catalogue of type specimens of the land snail genus Cyclophorus Monfort, 1810 (Caenogastropoda, Cyclophoridae) in the Natural History Museum, London + + + +Author + +Nantarat, Nattawadee +Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand & Biological Sciences Program, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand + + + +Author + +Sutcharit, Chirasak +Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand + + + +Author + +Tongkerd, Piyoros +Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand + + + +Author + +Ablett, Jonathan +Division of Higher Invertebrates, Natural History Museums, London, SW 7 5 BD, United Kingdom + + + +Author + +Naggs, Fred +Division of Higher Invertebrates, Natural History Museums, London, SW 7 5 BD, United Kingdom + + + +Author + +Panha, Somsak +Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand +somsak.pan@chula.ac.th + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2014 + +2014-05-23 + + +411 + + +1 +56 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.411.7258 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.411.7258 +1313-2970-411-1 +F95EFFFAFFF4FFDC0944FF9D2104C057 +578282 + + + + +Cyclophorus phlegethon Godwin-Austen, 1889 + + + + +Cyclophorus phlegethon +Godwin-Austen, 1889: 335, 336. +Kobelt 1902 +: 131. + + + +Type locality. +Molu Hills [Sarawak, Malaysia]. + + +Type material. + +Holotype NHMUK 1998011 ( +Fig. 16B; D +=39.1 mm, H=23.3 mm, W=4). + + + +Remarks. + +Godwin-Austen clearly stated that this taxon was described based on only one specimen, therefore we recognise this specimen as the holotype fixed by monotypy ( +ICZN 1999 +: Art. 73.1.2). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CB/56/37CB561922A6168FDC93334ACB717D78.xml b/data/37/CB/56/37CB561922A6168FDC93334ACB717D78.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e33994af490 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CB/56/37CB561922A6168FDC93334ACB717D78.xml @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Metopius (Ceratopius) citratus (Geoffroy, 1762) + + + + +Ichneumon citratus +Geoffroy, 1762 + + +dissectorius +(Panzer, 1805, +Ichneumon +) synonymy by +Horstmann (2006c) + + +sicarius +Gravenhorst, 1829 + + +zagoriensis +Hensch, 1928 + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CB/8E/37CB8E50872E50E4974EEE6A744AB7BC.xml b/data/37/CB/8E/37CB8E50872E50E4974EEE6A744AB7BC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9c2fbd1fa5d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CB/8E/37CB8E50872E50E4974EEE6A744AB7BC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ + + + +A checklist of land snails from the west coast islands of Sabah, Borneo (Mollusca, Gastropoda) + + + +Author + +Phung, Chee-Chean +Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia +cheecheanphung@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Yu, Fred Tuh Yit +Sabah Parks, Blok K, Lot 1 - 3, Tkt 1, Sinsuran, Peti Surat 10626, 88806 Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Malaysia + + + +Author + +Liew, Thor-Seng +Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia & Small Island Research Centre, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +2017-05-12 + + +673 + + +49 +104 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.673.12422 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.673.12422 +1313-2970-673-49 +567A576D1D154C27A4D6AFBA5C7C796B +FE0BFF96311AFFB0FF83FFA0FF8B7611 +582239 + + + + +Arinia borneensis E.A. Smith, 1894 +Figure 5B + + + +Type locality. +"Malaysia: Sabah: Sandakan-Gomantong" (E.A. Smith, 1894b) + + +Examined materials. + +Pulau Mantanani Besar +: + +BOR/MOL 3721, BOR/MOL 7172, BOR/MOL 7177, BOR/MOL 7183. +Pulau Mantanani Kecil +: BOR/MOL 3729, BOR/MOL 7196. +Pulau Lungisan +: BOR/MOL 3742. +Pulau Tiga +: BOR/MOL 6598, BOR/ +MOL 11100 + +. + +Pulau Usukan +: BOR/ +MOL 12026 + +, + +BOR/ +MOL 12028 + +, + +BOR/ +MOL 12037 + +, + +BOR/ +MOL 12048 + +, + +BOR/ +MOL 12051 + +, + +BOR/ +MOL 12053 + +. + +Pulau Kuraman +: BOR/ +MOL 12102 + +, + +BOR/ +MOL 12107 + +. + + + +Distribution in Sabah. + +Island +: [West] Mantanani group, Pulau Tiga, Pulau Usukan, Pulau Kuraman. +Mainland +: Kudat Division, Sandakan Division and Tawau Division. + + + +Remarks. +Endemic and widespread in Sabah. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CB/B3/37CBB3B36F8B2B5B5C6ACDF4B09ECF7C.xml b/data/37/CB/B3/37CBB3B36F8B2B5B5C6ACDF4B09ECF7C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d21505abbe8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CB/B3/37CBB3B36F8B2B5B5C6ACDF4B09ECF7C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ + + + +Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 1. Pteridophyta bis Caryophyllaceae (2 nd edition): Registerzuband 1 + + + +Author + +Hess, Hans Ernst + + + +Author + +Landolt, Elias + + + +Author + +Hirzel, Rosmarie + +text + +1972 +Birkhaeuser Verlag + + +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291815 + +book +291815 +10.5281/zenodo.291815 +3-7643-0843-5 + + + +<subSubSection id="D04D6A4F000DCD55039A47FF2A4FA3E3" pageId="null" pageNumber="825" type="nomenclature"> +<paragraph id="3D007B295DE5B84411EB23E225F47AA1" pageId="null" pageNumber="825"> +<taxonomicName id="AED3FF5E34C9FC35BE8242CECD40AECC" ID-CoL="6RN99" ID-ENA="169227" authority="(L.) Clairv." class="Magnoliopsida" family="Caryophyllaceae" genus="Moehringia" kingdom="Plantae" order="Caryophyllales" pageId="null" pageNumber="825" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="species" species="trinervia"> +Moehringia +<normalizedToken id="EA5D6F7FF38637C6AD4FA87BF31B4122" originalValue="trinérvia" pageId="null" pageNumber="825">trinervia</normalizedToken> +(L.) Clairv. +</taxonomicName> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="427FB3EF20A7C43C718F277894B3BFF5" pageId="null" pageNumber="825" type="vernacular_names"> +<paragraph id="A47DB350810C31F20EAD06F65242BF94" pageId="null" pageNumber="825">Dreinervige Nabelmiere</paragraph> +</subSubSection> + + + +1- bis +mehrjaehrig +; 10-25 cm hoch. Stengel niederliegend oder aufsteigend, verzweigt, +kurz behaart +(Haare 0,1-0,4 mm lang, mehrzellig). +Blaetter +3-5nervig, nicht fleischig, +breit lanzettlich +, spitz, die untern lang, die obern sehr kurz gestielt, 0,7-2,5 cm lang, +1-2 +1/2 +mal so lang wie breit +, am Rande und oft auch auf den +Flaechen +kurz behaart. +Blueten +einzeln in Blattachseln oder zu mehreren am Ende der Zweige. +Bluetenstiele +1-2mal so lang wie die krautigen obersten +Blaetter +, kurz behaart. +Kelchblaetter +5, schmal lanzettlich, zugespitzt, 3,5-4,5 mm lang, mit im untern Teil 0,2-0,5 mm breitem +haeutigem +Rand, 1-3nervig, am Rand und auf dem Mittelnerv kurz behaart. +Kronblaetter +5, +1/2-3/4 +so lang wie die +Kelchblaetter +, +weiss +. Kapsel +3/4 +-⅘ so lang wie die +Kelchblaetter +. Samen 0,9-1,1 mm lang, mit wenig tief +radiaer +geteiltem +Anhaengsel +. - +Bluete +: +Spaeter +Fruehling +und +frueher +Sommer. + + +Zytologische Angaben. 2n += +24: +Material von vielen Orten Europas (Rohweder 1939, +Litardiere +1948c, Blackburn und Morton 1957, +Boecher +und Larsen (1958b); auf Korsika wurde an einer besondern Sippe +2n = 48 +gezaehlt +( +Litardiere +1948c). + + +Standort. +Kollin und montan, selten subalpin. Ziemlich feuchte, +naehrstoffreiche +, meist kalkarme, lehmige +Boeden +in schattigen Lagen. +Waelder +, +Gebuesche +, +Waldschlaege +, Ufer. + + + +Verbreitung. +Europaeisch-westasiatische +Pflanze: + +Europa +(ohne Island und ohne arktische Gebiete, im +Sueden +nur in den Gebirgen); Kaukasus, Kleinasien, westliches Sibirien, einzelne Fundorte in Zentralasien; Nordwestafrika. Verbreitungskarte von Meusel (1964). - Im Gebiet ziemlich verbreitet und ziemlich +haeufig +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CC/84/37CC8404F86A523BA0A9E905C3AA440C.xml b/data/37/CC/84/37CC8404F86A523BA0A9E905C3AA440C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5fc69963423 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CC/84/37CC8404F86A523BA0A9E905C3AA440C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,250 @@ + + + +Reef benthos of Seychelles - A field guide + + + +Author + +Fassbender, Nico +Nekton Foundation, Oxford, United Kingdom +nico@nektonmission.org + + + +Author + +Stefanoudis, Paris V +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4040-8364 +Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom & Nekton Foundation, Oxford, United Kingdom + + + +Author + +Filander, Zoleka Nontlantla +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6905-4440 +Department of Forestry, Fisheries and Environment, Branch Oceans and Coasts, Cape Town, South Africa + + + +Author + +Gendron, Gilberte +Sustainable Ocean Seychelles, Victoria, Seychelles + + + +Author + +Mah, Christopher L +Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, Washington, United States of America + + + +Author + +Mattio, Lydiane +University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa & blue [c] weed, Brest, France + + + +Author + +Mortimer, Jeanne A +Seychelles' Conservation & Climate Adaptation Trust (SeyCCAT), Victoria, Mahe, Seychelles & Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America & Island Conservation Society (ICS), Point Larue, Mahe, Seychelles + + + +Author + +Moura, Carlos J +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6243-5988 +OKEANOS / DOP, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal + + + +Author + +Samaai, Toufiek +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7269-293X +Department of Forestry, Fisheries and Environment, Branch Oceans and Coasts, Cape Town, South Africa & University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa & iZiko Museums of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa & University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Cape Town, South Africa + + + +Author + +Samimi-Namin, Kaveh +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7744-9944 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands + + + +Author + +Wagner, Daniel +Conservation International, Arlington, United States of America + + + +Author + +Walton, Rowana +James Michel Blue Economy Research Institute, University of Seychelles, Anse Royale, Mahe ́, Seychelles + + + +Author + +Woodall, Lucy C +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7295-7184 +Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom & Nekton Foundation, Oxford, United Kingdom + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2021 + +2021-08-27 + + +9 + + +65970 +65970 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e65970 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e65970 +1314-2828-9-e65970 +A559676C573554B8A4CFB45D00F7A876 + + + + +Montipora sp. indet. + + + +Materials + + +Type status: + +Other material +. + +Taxon +: + +scientificName: +Montipora +; kingdom: +Animalia +; phylum: +Cnidaria +; class: +Anthozoa +; order: +Scleractinia +; family: +Acroporidae +; genus: +Montipora +; scientificNameAuthorship: +Blainville +, 1830; + +Location +: + +waterBody: +Indian Ocean +; country: +Seychelles +; locality: + +Aldabra N +1, +Aldabra W +1, +Alphonse N +1, +Astove W +1, +D'Arros N +1, +Desroches S +1, +Poivre E +1 + +; minimumDepthInMeters: + +8.8 m + +; maximumDepthInMeters: + +63.1 m + +; locationRemarks: +First Descent +: +Seychelles +Expedition +; + +Identification +: + +identifiedBy: + +Gilberte Gendron +, +Nico Fassbender +, +Paris Stefanoudis +, +Rowana Walton + +; dateIdentified: 2019, 2020; identificationRemarks: identified only from imagery; + +Event +: + +samplingProtocol: + +Submersible OR Remotely Operated Vehicle OR +SCUBA + +; + +Record Level +: + +basisOfRecord: +Human +observation + + + + + +Notes + +Colonies are thickly encrusting, sub-massive, plating. Maximum recorded size: 1.2 m across. Corallites are extremely small (0.25 to 1.0 mm) and thus not visible on video footage. Very rough, grainy texture, often with several bumps on colony surface. Colours ranging from beige to dark shades of brown, some species with variable additional pigmentation like purple, red and violet (Fig. +77 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CC/AB/37CCAB5976D5B3FEF32482ED02985A95.xml b/data/37/CC/AB/37CCAB5976D5B3FEF32482ED02985A95.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a918e19ec20 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CC/AB/37CCAB5976D5B3FEF32482ED02985A95.xml @@ -0,0 +1,319 @@ + + + +Two new species of the tribe Synanthedonini (Lepidoptera, Sesiidae), with new hostplant associations from Taiwan + + + +Author + +Liang, Jia-Yuan + + + +Author + +Hsu, Yu-Feng + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +861 + + +81 +90 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.861.34387 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.861.34387 +1313-2970-861-81 +C2E64AA3721B4648ABF28EC5B4B9E14C + + + + +Synanthedon auritinctaoidis +sp. nov. +Figs 1 +, +2 +, +5 +, +7 +, +9-11 + + + +Type material. + +Holotype: ♂, HUALIEN: Ruisui, Fuyuan National Forest Recreation Area, 410 m, 18 Feb 2018, reared from + +Helicia formosana + +, emg. 8 Mar 2014, J.Y. Liang Coll. (NHMUK). Paratypes: 5♀, same locality and date as holotype, emg. 12−24 Mar 2014, J.Y. Liang Coll. (1♀ Gen. Prep. JYL-303) (NTNU); 1♀, same locality, 6 Feb 2016, reared from + +H. formosana + +, emg. 11 Mar 2016, HSUM 16B82M, J.Y. Liang Coll. (NTNU); 1♂, 4♀, NEW TAIPEI CITY: Shenkeng, Houshanyue, 470 m, 16 Nov 2014, reared from + +Prunus campanulata + +, emg. 27 Dec 2014−4 Jan 2015, HSUM 14L07M, J.Y. Liang Coll. (1♂ Gen. Prep. JYL-302) (2♀ Gen. Prep. JYL-271 and JYL-306) (NTNU). + + + +Description. + +Male ( +Fig. 1 +): Antenna length 6.9−7.8 mm (n = 2); forewing length 8.4 −9.2 mm (n = 2); body length 10.7−12.1 mm (n = 2). Head: antenna black with blue-violet sheen; frons white; labial palpus black, yellow ventrally; vertex black with purplish sheen; pericephalic scales yellow with a few black scales dorsally. Thorax: patagia black with violet sheen; tegula black, bronzed-blue sheen with a yellow dorsal line; mesothorax black with blue sheen; metathorax yellow; thorax laterally yellow with a few black scales. Legs: fore coxa externally black, internally yellow; fore femur black, with violet sheen; fore tibia dark brown to black, with admixture of yellow scales distally; fore tarsus dorsally dark brown to black, ventrally entirely yellow; mid coxa and femur black, with violet sheen; mid tibia dark brown to black, base-ventrally with a large yellow spot, base of spurs yellow; spurs yellow with black distally; mid tarsus dorsally dark brown to black, with admixture of yellow scales distally, ventrally yellow; hind leg similar. Abdomen: black with blue sheen; tergites 2 and 6 with a narrow yellow stripe distally; tergite 4 with a broad yellow stripe; abdominal tuft black with bronzed-blue sheen, lateral margins with some yellow-orange scales. Forewing: basally black; costal margin dark brown to black; discal spot and veins within exterior transparent area dark brown to black; apical area dark brown with admixture of brown scales; discal spot broad; exterior transparent area large divided into four cells, level to M2 about 1.5 +xas +broad as discal spot and 0.6 +x +as broad as apical area; posterior transparent area reaching discal spot; cilia dark brown. Hindwing: transparent; veins, discal spot and outer margin dark brown to black with bronzed sheen; discal spot small, cuneiform, reaching to vein M2; cilia dark brown, pale yellow anally. + + + +Figures 1-4. +Synanthedonini +adults +1, 2 + +Synanthedon auritinctaoidis + +sp. nov. +1 +♂, holotype, Taiwan: Hualien (NHMUK). +2 +♀, paratype, Taiwan: Hualien (NTNU). +3, 4 + +Paranthrenella helvola + +sp. nov. +3 +♂, holotype, Taiwan: Nantou (NHMUK) +4 +♀, paratype, Taiwan: Nantou (NTNU). Scale bar: 10 mm. + + + +Female ( +Fig. 2 +): Antenna length 5.1−6.2mm (n = 9); forewing length 7.9−8.8 mm (n = 9); body length 8.5−10.8 mm (n = 9). Tergite 4 throughout yellow; anal tuft yellow laterally. Other characters identical to those of male. + + +Male genitalia (Gen. Prep. JYL-302, NTNU, +Fig. 5 +): Tegumen-uncus complex broad; socii well-developed with scopula androconialis, long, about as short as tegumen-uncus complex; uncus with a small narrow wing ventrally; crista gnathi medialis broad, with distal margin divided in two narrow wings; crista gnathi lateralis consisting of a rather broad, subcordiform, distal part and a narrow, crescent-shaped, proximal part; valva elongated, trapeziform, slightly turned down ventro-caudally; crista sacculi well-developed, large, divided into two pocket-shaped parts; dorsal part larger and armed at distal margin with strong, short, slightly bifurcate distally setae; ventral part of crista sacculi narrow, without setae; saccus rounded basally; phallus thin, about 0.8 +x +as short as valva; vesica without cornuti. + + + +Figures 5, 6. Male genitalia of +Synanthedonini +. +5 + +Synanthedon auritinctaoidis + +sp. nov. paratype (NTNU) +5a +distal part of phallus. +6 + +Paranthrenella helvola + +sp. nov. holotype (NHMUK) +6a +distal part of phallus. Scale bars: 1 mm; 0.1 mm ( +5a, 6a +). + + + +Female genitalia (Gen. Prep. JYL-306, NTNU, +Fig. 7 +): 8th tergite relatively large and broad with a few setae at distal margin; posterior apophysis long, about 2 +x +as long as anterior apophysis; ostium bursae opening near anterior margin of 8th sternite; +antrum +broad ring, well-sclerotized; ductus bursae narrow, long, membranous; corpus bursae membranous, ovoid, without signum. + + + +Figures 7, 8. Female genitalia of +Synanthedonini +. +7 + +Synanthedon auritinctaoidis + +Liang & Hsu, sp. nov. paratype (NTNU) +7a +antrum. +8 + +Paranthrenella helvola + +Liang & Hsu, sp. nov. paratype (NTNU) +8a +antrum. Scale bars: 1 mm; 0.1 mm ( +7a, 8a +). + + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Synanthedon auritinctaoidis + +sp. nov. is similar to + +S. auritincta + +(Wileman & South, 1918) in markings of body and wing, but may be distinguished by the following genitalia characters: saccus base rounded in + +S. auritinctaoidis + +, but emarginate in + +S. auritincta + +; phallus without tooth in + +S. auritinctaoidis + +, but + +S. auritincta + +with a small, strong tooth ventro distally; ostium bursae opening near anterior margin of 8th sternite in + +S. auritinctaoidis + +, but middle of 8th sternite in + +S. auritincta + +; antrum broad ring in + +S. auritinctaoidis + +, but funnel-shaped in + +S. auritincta + +. + + + +Etymology. + +This species is named + +auritinctaoidis + +, an adjective formed by adding the suffix -oides to + +auritincta + +, because of its superficial resemblance with + +S. auritincta + +(Wileman & South, 1918). + + + +Biology. + +The larva bores into burls of 5−20 cm in diameter on the trunk or branch of + +Helicia formosana + +Hemsl. ( +Proteaceae +) ( +Figs 9 +, +11 +) or + +Prunus campanulata + +(Maxim.) +Koidz +. ( +Rosaceae +) ( +Fig. 10 +), and feeds on callus tissue around the hole, which is covered with silk, debris, and frass. + + + +Figures 9-12. Biology. +9 +Galls induced by infection of a + +Synanthedon auritinctaoidis + +. Caterpillar on burls of + +Helicia formosana + +(Hualien Prefecture, Ruisui Township, Fuyuan National Forest Recreation Area) +10 +galls induced by infection of a + +S. auritinctaoidis + +caterpillar on burls of + +Prunus campanulata + +(New Taipei City, Shenkeng District, Houshanyue) +11 +caterpillar of + +S. auritinctaoidis + +sp. nov. in burls of + +H. formosana + +(Hualien Prefecture, Ruisui Township, Fuyuan National Forest Recreation Area) +12 +female adult of + +Paranthrenella helvola + +sp. nov. ovipositing on bark of + +Cinnamomum camphora + +(Taoyuan City, Fuxing District, Lian). + + + + +Distribution. +Known only from Taiwan. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CC/CD/37CCCD2563736FFFDB42EE4FA97BF88A.xml b/data/37/CC/CD/37CCCD2563736FFFDB42EE4FA97BF88A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..59398127a48 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CC/CD/37CCCD2563736FFFDB42EE4FA97BF88A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +bousquety1@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-11-28 + + +245 + + +1 +1722 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 +1313-2970-245-1 +FFFF52503A0AFF882450FFB66D45FF8E +578462 + + + + +Scaphinotus fissicollis (LeConte, 1853) + + + + +Nomaretus fissicollis +LeConte, 1853c: 399. Type locality: +"Illinois" +(original citation). Holotype [by monotypy] (♀) in MCZ [# 603]. + + + + +Distribution +. + + +This species ranges from southeastern Minnesota (Gandhi et al. 2005: 923) south to northern Arkansas (Allen and Thompson 1977: 32; Allen and Carlton 1988: 136), west to eastern Kansas [see Gidaspow 1973: Fig. 6]. The record from +"Texas" +(Schwarz 1895: 270) is probably in error. + + + +Records. + +USA +: AR, IA, IL, KS, MN, MO + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CE/02/37CE02BB2D64EB020C81D07B917FFDB5.xml b/data/37/CE/02/37CE02BB2D64EB020C81D07B917FFDB5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ef2e795ac7b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CE/02/37CE02BB2D64EB020C81D07B917FFDB5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ + + + +Order Chiroptera - Family Molossidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +432 +451 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Cynomops abrasus +subsp. +abrasus +Temminck 1827 + + + + + + + +Cynomops abrasus +subsp. +abrasus +Temminck 1827 + +, +Monogr. Mamm., Vol. 1: 232 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +" +Brazil +." + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CE/54/37CE5433643E9DC14CC1F25BB474728D.xml b/data/37/CE/54/37CE5433643E9DC14CC1F25BB474728D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d5ab8d54161 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CE/54/37CE5433643E9DC14CC1F25BB474728D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Texas spiders + + + +Author + +Dean, David Allen +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America +a-dean-ento@tamu.edu + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +2016-03-02 + + +570 + + +1 +703 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.570.6095 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.570.6095 +1313-2970-570-1 +CE0DA439F6F64DCF82255700A3C50098 +E376FF8EFFF1F22C326D1E0DFF8BFFDF +579094 + + + + +Emblyna reticulata (Gertsch & Ivie, 1936) + + + + +Emblyna reticulata +Jackman 1997 +: 163; +Knutson et al. 2010 +: 515; +Platnick 1993 +: 558 [T] + + +Dictyna reticulata +Gertsch and Ivie, 1936; +Breene et al. 1993c +: 14, 47, 54, mf (figs 13A-B); +Chamberlin and Gertsch 1958 +: 148 [S], mf, desc. (pl. 46, fig. 12, pl. 47, figs 1-7); +Dean and Sterling 1987 +: 6; +Gertsch and Mulaik 1940 +: 329; +Kaston 1972 +: 81, desc.; +Kaston 1978 +: 82, desc.; +Vogel 1970b +: 8 + + +Dictyna declarata +Gertsch and Mulaik, 1936; +Bonnet 1956 +: 1434; +Gertsch and Mulaik 1936a +: 9, f, desc. (fig. 11); +Gertsch and Mulaik 1940 +: 331 + + + +Distribution. +West and south Texas; Cameron, Howard, Reeves, Travis, Zapata + + +Time of activity. + +Male ( +"January-March" +, April, June - September); female ( +"January-March" +, April - August) + + + +Habitat. + +(crops: cotton); (soil/woodland: saltcedar, + +Juniperus ashei + +, + +Quercus virginiana + +) + + + +Method. +Beating [mf]; D-Vac suction [mf]; sweeping [mf] + + +Type. +Utah, Richfield + + +Etymology. +Latin, dorsum of abdomen with fine dark reticulations + + +Collection. +NMSU, TAMU + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CF/16/37CF16B1FADB5AD89F4348DE309C34CB.xml b/data/37/CF/16/37CF16B1FADB5AD89F4348DE309C34CB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1ee5b55562f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CF/16/37CF16B1FADB5AD89F4348DE309C34CB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + +Arachnid Fauna (Araneae and Opiliones) from the Castro Verde Special Protection Area, southern Portugal + + + +Author + +Barrientos, Jose A. +c / Balmes, 181, 3 °, 2 ª. 08006, Barcelona, Spain +joseantonio.barrientos@uab.es + + + +Author + +Prieto, Carlos E. +Departamento de Zoologia y Biologia Celular Animal, Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Universidad del Pais Vasco (UPV / EHU). Apdo. 644, 48080, Bilbao, Spain + + + +Author + +Pina, Silvia +CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Campus de Vairao, Universidade do Porto, 4485 - 661, Vairao, Portugal & CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349 - 017, Lisboa, Portugal + + + +Author + +Henriques, Sergio S +CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349 - 017, Lisboa, Portugal & Global Center for Species Survival, Indianapolis Zoo, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America & International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Species Survival Commission (SSC), Spider and Scorpion Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Sousa, Pedro +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5859-9656 +CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Campus de Vairao, Universidade do Porto, 4485 - 661, Vairao, Portugal & International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Species Survival Commission (SSC), Spider and Scorpion Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland + + + +Author + +Schindler, Stefan +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1755-4304 +CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Campus de Vairao, Universidade do Porto, 4485 - 661, Vairao, Portugal & CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349 - 017, Lisboa, Portugal & Community Ecology and Conservation, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Community Ecology and Conservation Research Group, Kamycka 129, CZ- 165 00, Prague, Czech Republic + + + +Author + +Reino, Luis +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-1097 +CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Campus de Vairao, Universidade do Porto, 4485 - 661, Vairao, Portugal & BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairao, 4485 - 661, Vairao, Portugal & CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349 - 017, Lisboa, Portugal + + + +Author + +Beja, Pedro +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8164-0760 +CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Campus de Vairao, Universidade do Porto, 4485 - 661, Vairao, Portugal & BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairao, 4485 - 661, Vairao, Portugal & CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349 - 017, Lisboa, Portugal + + + +Author + +Santana, Joana +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4100-8012 +CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Campus de Vairao, Universidade do Porto, 4485 - 661, Vairao, Portugal & BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairao, 4485 - 661, Vairao, Portugal & CIBIO, Centro de Investigacao em Biodiversidade e Recursos Geneticos, InBIO Laboratorio Associado, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349 - 017, Lisboa, Portugal +joanafsantana@cibio.up.pt + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-12-06 + + +11 + + +110415 +110415 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e110415 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e110415 +1314-2828-11-e110415 +BF394DECC50A52929EF52DFEC284014A + + + + +Thanatus vulgaris Simon, 1870 + + + +Distribution +Its distribution is wider than the previous species, as it also includes North America. It has already been reported for the District of Beja, as well as from many other localities in Portugal and Spain. It is a very common species in arid places, moving quickly on the ground during sunny hours; juvenile forms tend to climb and move through the vegetation. + + +Notes +2♂♂, 1♀, 155 jj. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CF/23/37CF23CA566FEDD2A11814E0BBDBC96F.xml b/data/37/CF/23/37CF23CA566FEDD2A11814E0BBDBC96F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..429f8544d45 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CF/23/37CF23CA566FEDD2A11814E0BBDBC96F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ + + + +Synopsis of the pelidnotine scarabs (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae, Rutelini) and annotated catalog of the species and subspecies + + + +Author + +Moore, Matthew R. +Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida Building 1881 Natural Drive Area, Steinmetz Hall, Box 110620, Gainesville, FL 32611 - 0620, USA + + + +Author + +Jameson, Mary L. +Department of Biological Sciences, Wichita State University 1845 Fairmount, Box 26, Wichita, KS 67260 - 0026, USA +maryliz.jameson@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Garner, Beulah H. +Natural History Museum, Insects Division, Department of Life Sciences, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5 BD, UK + + + +Author + +Audibert, Cedric +Musee des Confluences, Centre de Conservation et d'Etude des Collections, 13 A Rue Bancel, F- 69007 Lyon, France + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. +Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P. O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, K 1 P 6 P 4, Canada + + + +Author + +Seidel, Matthias + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +2017-04-06 + + +666 + + +1 +349 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.666.9191 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.666.9191 +1313-2970-666-1 +B3C377E8BBB14F328AECA2C22D1E625A +C43EEB41A94B930FFE439D1FAD29FF9C +579453 + + + + +Pelidnota vazdemelloi (Soula, 2006) + + + + +Strigidia vazdemelloi +Soula, 2006: 12, 55 [original combination]. + + +Pelidnota vazdemelloi +(Soula) [new combination by +Soula 2009 +: 116]. + + + +Distribution. + +BRAZIL: Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul ( +Soula 2006 +, +Garcia et al. 2013 +, +Oliveira et al. 2016 +). + + + +Types. + +The following specimens are at CCECL. 1 ♂ holotype, 1 ♀ allotype: "Mato Grosso, Brasil leg Alvarenga, XI 63 [crossed out]//Holotype 2006 + +Strigidia vazdemelloi + +Sou. Soula" (47030428); "Sinop//Allotype 2006 + +Strigidia vazdemelloi + +Sou. Soula" (47030429). Genitalia are card-mounted underneath the male holotype. Box 4618663 SOULA. + + + +Remarks. + +Soula (2006) +compared this species with + +P. discicollis + +and the image that accompanies the description looks remarkably similar to other specimens of + +P. discicollis + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CF/27/37CF27B3BC235F48EAE188AE456B592D.xml b/data/37/CF/27/37CF27B3BC235F48EAE188AE456B592D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9e51a5137f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CF/27/37CF27B3BC235F48EAE188AE456B592D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + +A nomenclator of extant and fossil taxa of the Melanopsidae (Gastropoda, Cerithioidea) + + + +Author + +Neubauer, Thomas A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-9941 +Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria +thomas.neubauer@nhm-wien.ac.at + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +2016-07-05 + + +602 + + +1 +358 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 +1313-2970-602-1 +65EFA27673454AC69B78DBE7E98D6103 +FFA86D39FFE2FFF3FF8AFFEBC209FFDE +126863 + + + + +Melanopsis rossmaessleri Bourguignat, 1884 + + + +Original source. + +Bourguignat 1884 +: 158. + + + +Type locality. + +"Spanien" +[Spain, no locality indicated by + +Rossmaessler +1839 + +: 42]. + + + + +Remarks +. + + +Introduced for + +Melanopsis cariosa + +sensu +Rossmaessler +, 1839, non Linnaeus, 1767. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CF/29/37CF2942AEA546A75AA679AEB2952570.xml b/data/37/CF/29/37CF2942AEA546A75AA679AEB2952570.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..666f8a0265f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CF/29/37CF2942AEA546A75AA679AEB2952570.xml @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ + + + +Annotated type catalogue of the Bulimulidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Orthalicoidea) in the Natural History Museum, London + + + +Author + +Breure, Abraham S. H. +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, Leiden, the Netherlands +bbreure@xs4all.nl + + + +Author + +Ablett, Jonathan D. +Natural History Museum, Division of Higher Invertebrates, London, SW 7 5 BD, UK + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2014 + +2014-03-21 + + +392 + + +1 +367 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.392.6328 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.392.6328 +1313-2970-392-1 +FFCF5A59FFB1FF93FFF10B43FFAFFFF5 +578044 + + + + +Bulimus albicolor Morelet, 1863 +Figs 4F +, L3vii + + + + +Bulimus albicolor +Morelet 1863 +: 199, pl. 11 fig. 9. + + +Bulimulus (Peronaeus) albicolor +; +Pilsbry 1896 [1895-1896] +: 148, pl. 46 figs 49-50. + + +Bostryx albicolor +; +Breure 1979 +: 51. + + + +Type locality. + +[Peru, Dept. Ayacucho] "Huanta et de la +vallee +de +l'Apurimac" +. + + + +Label. + +"Perou +/ Apurimac, Huanta"; in +Morelet's +handwriting. + + + +Dimensions. +"Longit 28, diam. 9 mm"; figured specimen herein H 28.2, D 10.92, W 8.3. + + +Type material. +NHMUK 1893.2.4.169-170, two syntypes (Morelet coll.). + + +Remarks. + +Further syntype material is present in the MHNG and RBINS collections. See also +Breure (2011) +. The current systematic position follows +Richardson (1995 +: 36). + + + +Current systematic position. + +Bulimulidae +, + +Bostryx orophilus + +(Morelet, 1860). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CF/31/37CF31EADD73B72D2CBFE7D22E30DC58.xml b/data/37/CF/31/37CF31EADD73B72D2CBFE7D22E30DC58.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c80adb62360 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CF/31/37CF31EADD73B72D2CBFE7D22E30DC58.xml @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ + + + +Pheidole in the New World. A dominant, hyperdiverse ant genus. + + + +Author + +Wilson, E. O. + +text + +2003 +Harvard University Press + +Cambridge, MA + + + +http://atbi.biosci.ohio-state.edu/HymOnline/reference-full.html?id=20017 + +book +20017 + + + + +Pheidole ceres Wheeler + + + + +Pheidole ceres Wheeler +1904a: 10. Syn.: +Pheidole ceres subsp. tepaneca Wheeler +1914c: 46, +n. syn. + + + +types Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard. + + +Etymology L Ceres, the pre-Roman goddess of agriculture, evidently in reference to the seed-harvesting practiced by the species. + + + +diagnosis A member of the " +bicarinata +complex" of the larger +pilifera +group, comprising +agricola +, +aurea +, +barbata +, +bicarinata +, +centeotl +, +cerebrosior +, +ceres +, +defecta +, +gilvescens +, +macclendoni +, +macrops +, +marcidula +, +paiute +, +pinealis +, +psammophila +, +vinelandica +, +xerophila +, +yaqui +, and +yucatana +, which complex is characterized by the large to very large, forward-set eyes, especially in the minor; and in the major, the occipital lobes lacking any sculpturing (except in +aurea +); the posterior half of the head capsule almost entirely smooth and shiny; and the postpetiolar node seen from above oval, elliptical, or laterally angulate (cornulate in +cerebrosior +). +P. ceres +is distinguished within the complex by the following combination of traits. Dark to blackish brown. Major: carinulae originating on the frontal triangle travel along the midline to the occiput; transverse carinulae present along the anterior lateral margins of the pronotum; mesonotal convexity and propodeal spines well-developed; postpetiole from above laterally angulate and diamond-shaped. + + + +Minor: eyes moderately large; mesonotal convexity low but well-developed. Measurements (mm) Lectotype major: HW 1.14, HL 1.18, SL 0.66, EL 0.16, PW 0.54. Paralectotype minor: HW 0.54, HL 0.60, SL 0.54, EL 0.12, PW 0.34. +Color Major: body blackish brown, with brownish yellow clypeus; appendages brownish yellow to medium brown. Minor: like the major, except that the clypeus is not yellow but dark brown and hence not contrasting. + + + +Range Foothills of the Rockies in eastern Colorado at 1800-2600 m, southwest to the mountains of New Mexico and Arizona, at 2200-2700 m, as well as extreme eastern Nevada. Also recorded from the Davis Mts. of Texas but evidently rare there (Creighton 1950a: 174), and from Guerrereo Mills, in the mountains of Hidalgo ( +tepaneca +types). + + + + +biology According to Stefan Cover, +ceres +is found at higher elevations and in colder climates than any other +Pheidole +species in the western North American fauna. In southern Arizona it is often the only +Pheidole +occurring above 2250 m. Gregg (1963) reports +ceres +to be the most abundant +Pheidole +in Colorado, where it occurs in a wide array of habitats, including ponderosa pine forest, foothills meadowland, and sagebrush. Cover found the species in the same general habitats in Arizona and New Mexico. In Nevada G. C. and J. Wheeler (1986g) found a colony at 2650 m in juniper-pinyon woodland. The ants collect and store seeds of a variety of grasses and herbaceous angiosperms. +P. ceres +nests in several types of open soil under rocks. Colonies are large and active, consisting of up to 1000 ants. Majors are numerous and most colonies are monogynous. +P. ceres +is also notable as the host of the workerles parasite +P. elecebra +. Winged sexuals have been found in nests principally from early to the middle of July, with one record of males on 9 September. Winged reproductives have been found in nests throughout July, and a wingless queen was collected on 21 July, presumably following a nuptial flight. + + + +Figure Upper: lectotype, major. Lower: paralectotype, minor. COLORADO: Colorado Springs (W. M. Wheeler). Scale bars = 1 mm. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/CF/7C/37CF7CCC2DAE40617EC538E252D857D3.xml b/data/37/CF/7C/37CF7CCC2DAE40617EC538E252D857D3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a22a85604e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/CF/7C/37CF7CCC2DAE40617EC538E252D857D3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ + + + +Brazilian Trichoptera Checklist II + + + +Author + +Paprocki, Henrique + + + +Author + +Franca, Diogo + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1557 +1557 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1557 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1557 +1314-2828-2-1557 + + + + +Marilia elongata Martynov, 1912 + + + +Distribution +Minas Gerais + + +Notes + +Martynov 1912 +, +Blahnik et al. 2004 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D0/17/37D0171F347D39FF0B323D212A9B4691.xml b/data/37/D0/17/37D0171F347D39FF0B323D212A9B4691.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0bed7acda57 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D0/17/37D0171F347D39FF0B323D212A9B4691.xml @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + +Australian Assassins, Part II: A review of the new assassin spider genus Zephyrarchaea (Araneae, Archaeidae) from southern Australia + + + +Author + +Rix, Michael G. + + + +Author + +Harvey, Mark S. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +191 + + +1 +62 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.191.3070 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.191.3070 +1313-2970-191-1 + + + + +Zephyrarchaea +sp. (unidentified juvenile specimens) + + + +Note. +In the absence of adult specimens or molecular data, the following juvenile specimens from Western Australia could not be confidently identified as a known species. + + +Material examined. + +AUSTRALIA: Western Australia:Stirling Range National Park: Talyuberlup Picnic Area, gully 400 m NW. of carpark, +34°24'42"S +, +117°57'12"E +, sifting grass patches within gully, 21.VI.2011, D. & S. Harms, 4 juveniles (WAM T118991). + + + +Remarks. + +These specimens are the first +Archaeidae +to be collected from lowland habitats in the Stirling Range National Park, and the first members of the Western Australian High Rainfall Zone Clade (Fig. 3) to be discovered in the Stirling Range. All four juveniles possess paired dorsal tubercles on the abdomen, clearly aligning them with +Zephyrarchaea mainae +and +Zephyrarchaea janineae +. +Zephyrarchaea mainae +has a known distribution that extends north to the Porongurup National Park (see Fig. 20), and it is possible that the Talyuberlup Picnic Area may represent a northern extension of this range. Adult specimens or sequence data are required to confirm the identification of this population. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D0/89/37D089C52576613899BE15185750347B.xml b/data/37/D0/89/37D089C52576613899BE15185750347B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..723de14565a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D0/89/37D089C52576613899BE15185750347B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +Genus Microsternus Lewis (1887) from China, with description of a new genus Neosternus from Asia (Coleoptera, Erotylidae, Dacnini) + + + +Author + +Dai, Cong-Chao + + + +Author + +Zhao, Mei-Jun + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2013 + +340 + + +79 +106 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.6044 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.6044 +1313-2970-340-79 + + + + + +Neosternus taiwanus ( +Chujo +, 1976) + +comb. n. + + + + +Microsternus taiwanus +Chujo +, 1976. + + + +Distribution. +China (Taiwan). + + +Diagnosis. +Characterized by its small body and markings of pronotum. + + +Comment. + +Chujo +described +Microsternus taiwanus +from Taiwan. According +Chujo's +description, +Neosternus taiwanus +is very similar to +Neosternus higonius +. The only difference between these two species were the bands of pronotum and elytra as noted in the key to species. No specimens are available for study. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D1/21/37D121838D5E9342D708B81F8A8AB5C5.xml b/data/37/D1/21/37D121838D5E9342D708B81F8A8AB5C5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..933a1589eb9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D1/21/37D121838D5E9342D708B81F8A8AB5C5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Mitella nuda +, +spec. nov. + + + + +2. Mitella scapo nudo. +Amoen. acad. 2. p. 352. + + + + +Habitat in +Asia +boreali. ♃ + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D1/66/37D1667324E4193FF3382478D99AFD18.xml b/data/37/D1/66/37D1667324E4193FF3382478D99AFD18.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ac2cd378459 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D1/66/37D1667324E4193FF3382478D99AFD18.xml @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +bousquety1@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-11-28 + + +245 + + +1 +1722 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 +1313-2970-245-1 +FFFF52503A0AFF882450FFB66D45FF8E +578462 + + + + + +Pterostichus +lubricus LeConte, 1853 + + + + + +Pterostichus lubricus +LeConte, 1853a: 240. Type locality: "upper part of Georgia" (original citation). Lectotype (♂), designated by Bousquet (1999: 126), in MCZ [# 5629]. + + + +Distribution. +This species is endemic to the Appalachian Mountains from southwestern Virginia (Hoffman 1998: 38) to northern Georgia (Fattig 1949: 26) and northwestern South Carolina (Ciegler 2000: 67), including the Great Balsam and Great Smoky Mountains (Barr 1969: 80). + + +Records. + +USA +: GA, NC, SC, TN, VA + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D2/50/37D250C4F9FED4E133A3161F09F8B53B.xml b/data/37/D2/50/37D250C4F9FED4E133A3161F09F8B53B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f4173d3d69a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D2/50/37D250C4F9FED4E133A3161F09F8B53B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,258 @@ + + + +Aquatic Insects from the Caatinga: checklists and diversity assessments of Ubajara (Ceara State) and Sete Cidades (Piaui State) National Parks, Northeastern Brazil + + + +Author + +Takiya, Daniela Maeda + + + +Author + +Santos, Allan Paulo Moreira + + + +Author + +Pinto, Angelo Parise + + + +Author + +Henriques-Oliveira, Ana Lucia + + + +Author + +Carvalho, Alcimar do Lago + + + +Author + +Sampaio, Brunno Henrique Lanzellotti + + + +Author + +Clarkson, Bruno + + + +Author + +Moreira, Felipe Ferraz Figueiredo + + + +Author + +Avelino-Capistrano, Fernanda + + + +Author + +Goncalves, Ines Correa + + + +Author + +Cordeiro, Isabelle da Rocha Silva + + + +Author + +Camara, Josenir Teixeira + + + +Author + +Barbosa, Julianna Freires + + + +Author + +de Souza, W. Rafael Maciel + + + +Author + +Rafael, Jose Albertino + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8354 +8354 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8354 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8354 +1314-2828--8354 + + + + +Neotrichia sp. 1 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Takiya, D.M. +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Piaui +; municipality: Piracuruca; locality: + +Parque Nacional de Sete Cidades, Cachoeira do +Riachao + +; maximumElevationInMeters: 171; verbatimCoordinates: +4°6'28"S +, +41°40'13"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Pennsylvania light trap +; verbatimEventDate: +19.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Takiya, D.M. +; individualCount: +16 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Piaui +; municipality: Piracuruca; locality: +Parque Nacional de Sete Cidades, Riacho da Piedade +; maximumElevationInMeters: 169; verbatimCoordinates: +4°6'34"S +, +41°43'39"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +Pennsylvania light trap +; verbatimEventDate: +19.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Takiya, D.M. +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Piaui +; municipality: Piracuruca; locality: +Parque Nacional de Sete Cidades, Alojamento +; maximumElevationInMeters: 193; verbatimCoordinates: +4°5'57"S +, +41°42'34"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +White sheet light trap +; verbatimEventDate: +20.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: recordedBy: +Takiya, D.M. +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +female +; lifeStage: +adult +; Location: country: +Brazil +; stateProvince: +Piaui +; municipality: Piracuruca; locality: +Parque Nacional de Sete Cidades, Alojamento +; maximumElevationInMeters: 193; verbatimCoordinates: +4°5'57"S +, +41°42'34"W +; Identification: identifiedBy: +Allan Paulo Moreira dos Santos +; Event: samplingProtocol: +White sheet light trap +; verbatimEventDate: +20.iv.12 +; Record Level: institutionCode: +DZRJ +; basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D2/5D/37D25D11C32B0360DA8C4EEABC1DED71.xml b/data/37/D2/5D/37D25D11C32B0360DA8C4EEABC1DED71.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..93c8d6f6bc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D2/5D/37D25D11C32B0360DA8C4EEABC1DED71.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828--8013 + + + + +Mesopolobus nobilis (Walker, 1834) + + + + +Platyterma nobile +Walker, 1834 + + +decorum +(Walker, 1834, +Platyterma +) + + + +Distribution +England + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D2/6A/37D26A05ABA111CEC7B82C2DEEEBEF20.xml b/data/37/D2/6A/37D26A05ABA111CEC7B82C2DEEEBEF20.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5567abd9ba9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D2/6A/37D26A05ABA111CEC7B82C2DEEEBEF20.xml @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ + + + +New records of Agromyzidae (Diptera) from Switzerland and an updated checklist + + + +Author + +erny, Milos + + + +Author + +Baechli, Gerhard + +text + + +Alpine Entomology + + +2018 + +2 + + +115 +137 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/alpento.2.28973 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/alpento.2.28973 +2535-0889--115 +C7E181A32C884D14B2A67D49ECBB2CDB + + + + +Liriomyza buhri Hering, 1937 + + + +Material examined. + +GR: Dischmatal [ +46°45'N +, +9°54'E +, 1600m a.s.l.], 1 ♂, 22.v.1991, 1 ♂, 16.-31.vii.1991, P. +Brodmann +leg. TI: Cardada, Gimetta, 1700m a.s.l., [ +46°12'N +, +8°48'E +], 1 ♂, 24.viii.2013; Robiei [ +46°27'N +, +8°31'E +, 1900m a.s.l.], 2 ♂♂, 4.-5.vii.2008; Val Bavona [ +46°24'N +, +8°34'E +, 600m a.s.l.], 1 ♂, 27.vii.1997. UR: Furkapass, ALPFOR Area, [ +46°35'N +, +8°25'E +, 2500m a.s.l.], 1 ♂, 25.vii.2012. VS: Jeizinen, 2000m a.s.l., [ +46°20'N +, +7°44'E +], 1 ♂, 3.vii.2001; Morgins, Porte de Culet [ +46°13'N +, +6°52'E +, 1700m a.s.l.], 3 ♂♂, 28.vii.2004; Pfynwald [ +46°38'N +, +7°37'E +, 600m a.s.l.], 1 ♂, 15.v.1996, B. Merz & G. +Baechli +leg. ZH: Marthalen [ +47°38'N +, +8°39'E +, 390m a.s.l.], 2 ♂♂, 8.vi.2008. + + + +Distribution. + +Europe: Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Lithuania, Montenegro, Norway, Poland, Slovakia, Sweden; Asia: Asian Russia - Yakutia, Turkey ( + +Papp and +Cerny +2017 + +). First record from Switzerland. + + + +Biology. + +Host plants +Campanula +, +Jasione +, +Phyteuma +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D2/C6/37D2C635D15E6628C7147D624F65F1C0.xml b/data/37/D2/C6/37D2C635D15E6628C7147D624F65F1C0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..038dcd25cc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D2/C6/37D2C635D15E6628C7147D624F65F1C0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Cactus melocactus +, +spec. nov. + + + + +2. Cactus subrotundus quatuordecim-angularis. +Hort. cliff. 181. +Hort. ups. 119. +Roy. lugdb. 279. + + +Melocactus indiae occidentalis. +Bauh. pin. 384. + + +EchinoMelocactus. +Clus. exot. 92. t. 92. + + + + +Habitat in +Jamaica +, +America +calidiore. ♄ + + + + + +* Cerei +erecti stantes per se. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D3/06/37D3060BD52992A85D73BFF32B39321F.xml b/data/37/D3/06/37D3060BD52992A85D73BFF32B39321F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..23eb945d676 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D3/06/37D3060BD52992A85D73BFF32B39321F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +A nomenclator of extant and fossil taxa of the Melanopsidae (Gastropoda, Cerithioidea) + + + +Author + +Neubauer, Thomas A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-9941 +Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria +thomas.neubauer@nhm-wien.ac.at + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +2016-07-05 + + +602 + + +1 +358 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.602.8136 +1313-2970-602-1 +65EFA27673454AC69B78DBE7E98D6103 +FFA86D39FFE2FFF3FF8AFFEBC209FFDE +126863 + + + + +† +Boistelia stricturata Jekelius, 1944 +[invalid] + + + +Original source. + +Jekelius 1944 +: 136, pl. 55, figs 1-14. + + + +Type horizon. +Early Pannonian, late Miocene. + + +Type locality. +"Turislav-Tal bei Soceni" [Turislav valley near Soceni], Romania. + + +Remarks. + +Junior secondary homonym and junior synonym of + +Melanopsis stricturata + +Brusina, 1892 (see discussion in +Neubauer et al. 2014a +: 463). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D3/0B/37D30B4479DCCFEDD4EE0C5F64C8F97F.xml b/data/37/D3/0B/37D30B4479DCCFEDD4EE0C5F64C8F97F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..253021c0810 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D3/0B/37D30B4479DCCFEDD4EE0C5F64C8F97F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Subtribe +Stenolophina Kirby, 1837 + + + + +Stenolophidae +Kirby, 1837: 46 [stem: Stelonoph-]. Type genus: +Stenolophus +Dejean, 1821. + + +Polpochilinae +H. W. Bates, 1891a: 10 [stem: Polpochil-]. Type genus: +Polpochila +Solier, 1849. + + +Acupalpini +Tschitscherine +, 1900: 351 [stem: Acupalp-]. Type genus: +Acupalpus +Latreille, 1829. + + +Cratocarini +Casey, 1914b: 48 [stem: Cratocar-]. Type genus: +Cratocara +J. L. LeConte, 1863 [syn. of +Polpochila +Solier, 1849]. + + +Pachytracheli +Csiki, 1932a: 1082 [stem: Pachytrachel-]. Type genus: +Pachytrachelus +Chaudoir, 1852. Comment: name proposed after 1930 without description or bibliographic reference to such a description (Art. 13.1), however available because it was used as valid before 2000 as in Jeannel (1948b: 720, as +Pachytrachelini +) and was not rejected by an author who, between 1961 and 1999, applied Article 13 of the then current edition of the Code (see Art. 13.2.1). + + +*Agonoderi +Csiki, 1932a: 1188 [stem: Agonoder-]. Type genus: +Agonoderus +Dejean, 1829. Comment: unavailable family-group name, proposed after 1930 without description or bibliographic reference to such a description (Art. 13.1). + + +*Bradycelli +Csiki, 1932a: 1222 [stem: Bradycell-]. Type genus: +Bradycellus +Erichson, 1837. Comment: unavailable family-group name, proposed after 1930 without description or bibliographic reference to such a description (Art. 13.1). + + +Anoplogenii +Schauberger, 1937: 272 [stem: Anoplogeni-]. Type genus: +Anoplogenius +Chaudoir, 1852 [syn. of +Loxoncus +Schmidt-Goebel +, 1846]. + + +*Dichirotrichi +F. Burmeister, 1939: 186 [stem: Dicheirotrich-]. Type genus: +Dicheirotrichus +Jacquelin du Val, 1855 [as +Dichirotrichus +, unjustified emendation of type genus name by Gemminger and Harold (1868a: 262), not in prevailing usage]. Comment: unavailable family-group name, proposed after 1930 without description or bibliographic reference to such a description (Art. 13.1); incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage (see Madge 1989: 463). + + +Bradycellini +Jeannel, 1942: 700 [stem: Bradycell-]. Type genus: +Bradycellus +Erichson, 1837. + + +Hippolaetina +Basilewsky, 1951b: 258 [stem: Hippoloet-]. Type genus: +Hippoloetis +Laporte, 1835 [as +Hippolaetis +, incorrect subsequent spelling of type genus name, not in prevailing usage]. Comment: incorrect original stem formation, not in prevailing usage. + + +Anthracini +Schuler, 1970: 114 [stem: Anthrac-]. Type genus: +Anthracus +Motschulsky, 1850. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D3/5E/37D35E7C7C2257F07DA01B337C731372.xml b/data/37/D3/5E/37D35E7C7C2257F07DA01B337C731372.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a84b8c86b18 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D3/5E/37D35E7C7C2257F07DA01B337C731372.xml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +bousquety1@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-11-28 + + +245 + + +1 +1722 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 +1313-2970-245-1 +FFFF52503A0AFF882450FFB66D45FF8E +578462 + + + + +Pseudanophthalmus cordicollis Barr, 1981 + + + + +Pseudanophthalmus cordicollis +Barr, 1981: 82. Type locality: "Little Kennedy Cave, Wise Co[unty], Virginia" (original citation). Holotype (♂) in AMNH. + + + +Distribution. +This species is known only from a few caves in Wise County, southwestern Virginia (Barr 2004: 39). + + +Records. + +USA +: VA + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D3/78/37D3781F04D834F366416E6534A96698.xml b/data/37/D3/78/37D3781F04D834F366416E6534A96698.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4fad8c71b98 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D3/78/37D3781F04D834F366416E6534A96698.xml @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + + +Hybrizon +Fallen +, 1813 + + + + + +PAXYLLOMA +Latreille, 1817 + + +PLANCUS +Curtis, 1833 + + +PACHYLOMMA +Ratzeburg, 1848 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D3/B9/37D3B9F4F3E458299823B8E3173F0912.xml b/data/37/D3/B9/37D3B9F4F3E458299823B8E3173F0912.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..92e82237526 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D3/B9/37D3B9F4F3E458299823B8E3173F0912.xml @@ -0,0 +1,262 @@ + + + +Redescription of two species of Microcyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) and use of ordination models to classify American species + + + +Author + +Gutierrez-Aguirre, Martha Angelica +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9329-820X +Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Quintana Roo (UQROO), Campus Cozumel, Av. Andres Quintana Roo s / n, 77600, Cozumel, Quintana Roo, Mexico +marguta71@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Cervantes-Martinez, Adrian +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8366-4803 +Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Quintana Roo (UQROO), Campus Cozumel, Av. Andres Quintana Roo s / n, 77600, Cozumel, Quintana Roo, Mexico + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2023 + +2023-08-03 + + +1173 + + +111 +130 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1173.97827 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1173.97827 +1313-2970-1173-111 +89FB4EB463E34A78A3EFF882CF158283 +5D0D5F10850554C4A229A2D8BE3EBAAD + + + + +Microcyclops finitimus Dussart, 1984 + + + + +Figs 1 +, 2 + + + + +Microcyclops finitimus +Dussart, 1984: 57, 58, fig. 19A; +Dussart 1983 +: 325, fig. 2B; +da Rocha and Por 1998 +: 2138; +da Rocha 1998 +: 426-431, figs 6, 7, 12, 18; + +Gutierrez-Aguirre +and +Cervantes-Martinez +2016 + +: 54, fig. 14A-E. + + + +Material examined. + + + + +Holotype + +. + +One +dissected adult female on a slide labelled as + +Microcyclops finitimus + +female nov. sp. + +' +Lagoon' + +with + +Trapa + +between Coporito and Barrancas +, +Venezuela +24.X.1981 +, 8h40. +Collector Bernard Dussart +, and det. +B. Dussart +(MNHN Cp-678). + + + + +Other material. + + +One dissected, adult female on a slide labelled as + +Microcyclops finitimus + +female. Rorota, +pres +Guyane +21.X.1985 +. +GUYANE +. +Collector Bernard Dussart +, and det. +B. Dussart +(MNHN Cp-7294) + +. + + + +Redescription based on the holotype. + +Female +: body length excluding furcal setae = 0.89 mm (as described by +Dussart 1984 +). Labral plate distally toothed: eight central teeth are flanked by lateral, basally widened teeth, which are followed by two low teeth on each side; medial labral plate with two groups of long, wide setulae; lateral lobes rounded (Fig. +1A +). + + + +Figure 1. + +Microcyclops finitimus + +. Adult female (MNHN-Cp678) +A +labrum +B +antenna, note that the distal group of spines is arrowed in this caudal-frontal view +C +maxillule, note that the lateral lobe of maxillular palp is missing (area arrowed) +D +maxilla +E +maxilliped, note that the insertion of broken off seta is suggested (indicated by?) +F +first leg, medial area: intercoxal sclerite, Bsp, and Enp1. Scale bars: 50 +µm +. + + +Antennule 12-segmented: each segment was armed with setae (s), spines (sp) or aesthetascs (ae) in the following order: (1) 8 s; (2) 4 s; (3) 2 s; (4) 6 s; (5) 3 s; (6) 1 s + 1 sp; (7) 2 s; (8) 3 s; (9) 2 s + 1ae; (10) 2 s; (11) 2 s + 1 ae; (12) 7 s + 1 ae. + +Antenna with two groups of spinules on the basal margin of the basis in caudal view. In the frontal view antennal basis with two groups of spinules: one next to the exopodal seta, on the distal region (arrowed in Fig. +1B +) and one is along the lateral margin. + + +Maxillule (Fig. +1C +): praecoxal arthrite with seven setae. Apical region of maxillary palp with two setae armed with tiny spinules, plus a third seta with long setules. Lateral lobe lost (area arrowed in Fig. +1C +). One smooth proximal seta. + + +Maxillary syncoxal surface smooth (Fig. +1D +). Distal coxal endite with two setae: proximal seta distally bifurcated, with long spinules; distal seta with an elongated row of spine-like setules. Basipodite with a bump bearing robust, engrossed spines on the concave margin and one long, bare seta on its base. Enp1 and Enp2 bearing two and three naked and long setae, respectively. + + +Maxilliped with syncoxa (3 setae, one broken off), basis (2 setae), and two-segmented Enp bearing one and three setae, respectively. Syncoxa, basis, and Enp1 with rows of spinae: basis on frontal and caudal surfaces; syncoxa and Enp1 only on the frontal surface (Fig. +1E +). + + +Medial margin of basipodites of P1-P4 with long hair-like setae. There is no medial spine on the margin of BspP1 (Fig. +1F +). Intercoxal sclerite of P1, and P2 quadrangular, naked (Figs +1F +, +2A +). Intercoxal sclerite of P3 rectangular with long and robust spinules arranged laterally along the distal margin of the plate (Fig. +2B +). Proximal region of the intercoxal sclerite of P3 not observable (indicated by? in Fig. +2B +). + + + +Figure 2. + +Microcyclops finitimus + +. Adult female (MNHN-Cp678) +A +second leg, medial area: intercoxal sclerite, Bsp, and Enp1 +B +third leg, medial area: intercoxal sclerite, and Bsp: the basal area of intercoxal sclerite was not verified (indicated by?) +C +fourth leg, medial area: intercoxal sclerite, and Bsp +D +urosome, note the separate terminal caudal seta. Scale bars: 50 +µm +. + + + +P4 as illustrated and described by +Dussart (1984 +: 57, 58, fig. 19A): intercoxal sclerite rectangular, with two rows of spinules; distal row with elongated spinules, proximal row with short spinules (Fig. +2C +). Ratio between the lengths to width of Enp2P4 is 2.2-2.5; the medial spine of Enp2P4 is 1.3 +x +as long as lateral spine and 0.7 +x +as long as the segment. + + +Fifth pediger bare, with dorsal hyaline membrane serrated posteriorly (Fig. +2D +); length to width ratio of genital double somite 0.78. Free segment of P5 3.0 +x +as long as wide, bearing one tiny medial spinule, and 0.4 +x +as long as distal seta. Hyaline fringes of prosomal somites smooth, except the fourth which is serrated; urosomal somites with hyaline fringes slightly serrated. As described by +Dussart (1984) +, length to width ratio of the caudal ramus is 4.1, the inner margin naked; no spinules at the base of the lateral caudal (II) but spines at the base of the outermost terminal (III) caudal setae (spines verified in MHN-Cp7294). Spinae along dorsal and ventral margins of anal somite. Lateral caudal seta (II) inserted 73.0-75.5% of the caudal ramus. + + +Dorsal caudal seta (VII) 0.5-0.7 +x +as long as caudal ramus, innermost terminal caudal seta (VI) 1.05 +x +as long as caudal ramus. Length ratio between outer median (IV) and outermost terminal seta (III) is 6.0; and between medial median (V) and outermost terminal seta (III) is 8.9 (Fig. +2D +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D4/93/37D4935D42855007996944D3CCB9E4EC.xml b/data/37/D4/93/37D4935D42855007996944D3CCB9E4EC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5d7745c31ed --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D4/93/37D4935D42855007996944D3CCB9E4EC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +First record of the genus Pseudamblyopus (Coleoptera, Erotylidae) in China, with description of a new species + + + +Author + +Liu, Jing +College of Plant Protection, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China + + + +Author + +Lu, Weicheng +College of Plant Protection, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China + + + +Author + +Zang, Haoming +College of Plant Protection, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China + + + +Author + +Li, Jing +College of Plant Protection, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China +lijing1976416514@163.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2021 + +2021-05-26 + + +1040 + + +25 +31 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1040.59547 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1040.59547 +1313-2970-1040-25 +CF172EA595BE4124907CACE20B18D69B +C9C629B51405542DA8EB2683CE5DBB43 + + + + +Genus +Pseudamblyopus Araki, 1941 + + + +Type species. + + +Amblyopus palmipes + +Lewis, 1889. + + + +Diagnosis. + +Body small to medium-sized, oval to elongate oval, distinctly convex dorsally. +Head +with a pair of stridulatory files on the occipital region; lacinia without teeth at apex; terminal maxillary palpomere nearly triangular to semicircular; mentum much longer than wide, sharply and triangularly ridged on its surface; terminal labial palpomere elongate but not dilated terminally. Compound eye small and finely facetted; antennae rather short, antennomere III nearly equal in length to antennomere IV and V combined; antennal club compactly articulated, antennomere XI irregularly rounded, almost as long as wide, and much narrower than preceding segment. +Pronotum +approximately twice as wide at the base as long. The base of pronotum narrower than the base of elytra. +Elytra +convex, with eight regular rows of fine punctures on each elytron located in bottom of longitudinal furrows (striae). +Prosternum +rather short, prosternal process wide, widened posteriorly, markedly emarginate at its posterior border. +Prosternum +with prosternal lines, metaventrite with postmesocoxal lines and basal abdominal ventrite with postmetacoxal lines. + + +Legs +rather short and robust; tibiae markedly expanded terminally. + + + +Sexual dimorphism +: + +male with legs more robust than in female, with extended and more dilated protarsi. + + + +Distribution. +Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu), China (Guangdong), India (Nilgiri Hills), Russia (Far East). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D4/BD/37D4BD2F63500D4571E36A9C5FD0AC61.xml b/data/37/D4/BD/37D4BD2F63500D4571E36A9C5FD0AC61.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ce4ba7cc2eb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D4/BD/37D4BD2F63500D4571E36A9C5FD0AC61.xml @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + +A taxonomic revision of the subfamily Tillinae Leach sensu lato (Coleoptera, Cleridae) in the New World + + + +Author + +Burke, Alan + + + +Author + +Zolnerowich, Gregory + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +719 + + +75 +157 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.719.21253 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.719.21253 +1313-2970-719-75 +36C4E2C8E07D4CC9A1D696B0FCE92CCF + + + + +Araeodontia picipennis Barr, 1952a + + + +Synonyms. + +Cymatodera picipennis +Barr, 1950b, Proc. California Acad. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 24, no. 12, p 495. + + + +Type material not examined. + + +Type locality. +Venancio, Lower California. Type depository: California Academy of Sciences (CASC). + + +Distribution. +Mexico: Baja California. + +The +following is + +Barr's +(1950a) + +original description for +Cymatodera picipennis +. + +Female: Medium size, somewhat elongate; piceous; pronotum faintly paler at sides and across middle; elytra with brownish subapical spots, right elytron with a broad, faintly indicated, brownish ante-median area along lateral margin at middle; undersurface dark testaceous. Head finely, somewhat sparsely punctured, finely wrinkled at base, sparsely clothed with short, erect brownish hairs; front feebly bi-impressed; antennae brown, stout, reaching basal fourth of elytra, second segment two-thirds as long as third, third segment slightly longer than fourth, segments 5 to 10 nearly equal in length, longer than those preceding, cylindrical, outer margin of each of these segments broadly rounded, slightly incrassate at apex. Pronotum one-third longer than basal width; surface finely, sparsely punctured, sparsely clothed with short, fine pale hairs, intermixed with moderately long, erect brown hairs; ante-scutellar impression wanting. Elytra two and one-half times longer than basal width, nearly twice as wide as pronotum at base; humeri distinct; sides widest behind middle; apices nearly conjointly rounded; surface with striae consisting of fine punctures, extending to subapical spots, interspaces much wider than punctures, sparsely clothed with short, suberect pale hairs. Legs dark testaceous, piceous at apices of femora and bases of tibiae, finely, densely punctured, densely clothed with short, brown hairs; middle tibiae dark. Metaventrite finely and very sparsely punctured. Abdomen finely, densely punctured; fifth sternite rounded at apex, deeply incised at middle; sixth sternite semicircular in shape; sixth tergite longer and broader than sixth sternite, narrowly rounded at apex. Length: 7 mm. + +Holotype, female (C. A. S. No. 5622) from Venancio, July 17, 1938, collected by Michelbacher and Ross. +C. picipennis +belongs to the +Xanti +group in +Wolcott's +key and will run to +C. tuta +Wolcott and +C. laevicollis +Schaeffer. It may be separated from these two species by the dark piceous color with the brown, subapical elytral spots and by the structure of the antennae. This species is described from a single female which is in a somewhat damaged condition, the left antenna is broken off at the fourth segment, one of the hind legs is missing, and several of the tarsi are gone. However, the critical characters are present and the species appears to be sufficiently distinct to warrant a name at this time. + + + +Remarks. + +Barr (1952a) +, in his revision of the genus +Araeodontia +, stated that this species is restricted to an area in the vicinity of San Venancio, Baja California Sur, Mexico, and it is only known from the female holotype. Barr indicated that +A. picipennis +is most similar to +A. peninsularis +; however, the two species can be differentiated by the structure of the tarsal claws and the elytral disc pattern; specifically, in +A. picipennis +, the two inner tarsal denticles are slender and closely approximated and the elytral disc is immaculate, in a pale testaceous tone. In +A. peninsularis +, the tarsal denticles are thicker and distinctly separated, and each elytron has two irregular testaceous maculae, the first located on the anterior half, reaching the middle third of elytral disc, and the second maculae adjacent to epipleural apex. Barr pointed out that the validity of the species is questionable and perhaps its rarity is due to its close resemblance with +A. peninsularis +, with the holotype possibly just a case of the maculae being absent. If so, +A. picipennis +would be treated as a junior synonym of +A. peninsularis +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D5/0B/37D50B5DA272DD3BF0DA372FE5CF5D2E.xml b/data/37/D5/0B/37D50B5DA272DD3BF0DA372FE5CF5D2E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c1b36927e5b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D5/0B/37D50B5DA272DD3BF0DA372FE5CF5D2E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828-4-8013 + + + + +Stenomalina gracilis (Walker, 1834) + + + + +Eutelus gracilis +Walker, 1834 + + +aurifer +(Walker, 1835, +Pteromalus +) + + +thessalus +(Walker, 1839, +Pteromalus +) + + +psittacinus +( +Foerster +, 1841, +Pteromalus +) + + +seladonius +( +Foerster +, 1841, +Pteromalus +) + + + +Distribution +England, Wales + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D5/81/37D581EB0EE3559B9676EA7E8EECBF24.xml b/data/37/D5/81/37D581EB0EE3559B9676EA7E8EECBF24.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c70190bec6c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D5/81/37D581EB0EE3559B9676EA7E8EECBF24.xml @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@ + + + +Cretaceous Horse flies and their phylogenetic significance (Diptera: Tabanidae) + + + +Author + +do Carmo, Daniel Dias Dornelas +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0616-5856 +Faculdade de Filosofia Ciencias e Letras, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil +dandorndias@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Sampronha, Stephanie +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4767-3232 +Centro de Ciencias Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Avenida dos Estados, 5001, Santo Andre, Sao Paulo, Brazil + + + +Author + +Santos, Charles Morphy D. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5577-0799 +Centro de Ciencias Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Avenida dos Estados, 5001, Santo Andre, Sao Paulo, Brazil + + + +Author + +Ribeiro, Guilherme Cunha +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-2651 +Centro de Ciencias Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Avenida dos Estados, 5001, Santo Andre, Sao Paulo, Brazil + +text + + +Arthropod Systematics & amp; Phylogeny + + +2022 + +2022-07-21 + + +80 + + +295 +307 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.80.e86673 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.80.e86673 +1864-8312-80-295 +BE39D533FE5242B7870A5D3B0764D4E2 +1DD567A964C85543B6440317A9713FD7 + + + + +Araripus crassitibialis sp. nov. Carmo and Sampronha + + + + +Figs 5 +, 6 + + + +Examined material. + + + +Holotype +female + +: GP1e/8751 NE +Brazil +, +Crato Formation +, +Aptian +, +Lower Cretaceous. + + + + +Preservation. +Preserved in dorsal view. Frons and occiput visible. Scutellum, notopleuron, one halter, foreleg preserved. Wings partially preserved. Tergites I-VII, tergite X and cercus visible. + + +Diagnosis. +The same as the genus. + + +Description. + + +Holotype female +. + +Length 23.5 mm, wing 15.5 mm. - +Head +: hemispherical, narrower than thorax; scape oval, nearly as wide as long; frons appears divergent above; frontal callus absent; apparent callosity visible near the vertex; subcallus not inflated or pronounced; notopleuron robust and well developed. - +Thorax +: scutum and scutellum visible, the former much longer than wide. - +Legs +: fore tibia inflated. - +Wings +: vein Sc very long, inserting in C very close to R1, with few visible setae; pterostigma small, barely visible; R2+3 very sinuous, inserting in C parallel to R4 and forming a 90° angle; vein R4 strongly angled and without an appendix; cell r5 open; vein M1 sub-parallel to M2; M3 diverging from M2; vein r-m inclined towards wing base; m-cu inserted very close to the origin of R4; wing +ca. +3 times longer than wide. - +Abdomen +: nearly twice the length of the thorax. - +Terminalia +: Tergite X appears to be undivided; cercus two-segmented. + + + +Etymology. + +From latin, +crassus +(tick) + +tibia +(leg), in reference to the enlarged tibia. + + + +Comments. + +The inflated tibia is present in several species from different tabanid genera, especially in the +Chrysopsinae +and +Tabaninae +subfamilies ( + +Coscaron +and Papavero 2009a + +), but had not been previously recorded for Cretaceous species. As in + +Cratotabanus + +, the female terminalia in + +Araripus + +gen. nov. +has a two-segmented cercus. This is absent from every extant horse flies; in fact, the presence of a one-segmented cercus is synapomorphy of a clade formed by +Athericidae ++ +Tabanidae +( +Yeates 2002 +). + + + +Figure 5. + +Araripus crassitibialis + +gen. nov. et sp. nov. +Holotype female. +A +Habitus, preserved in dorsal view. +B +Head. +C +Terminalia. Scale bars: 5 mm (A); 1 mm (B); 0.2 mm (C). + + + + +Figure 6. + +Araripus crassitibialis + +gen. nov et sp. nov. Holotype female. A +Illustration of habitus. +B +Wing venation. +C +Terminalia. Scale bars: 5 mm (A, B); 0.2 mm (C). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D7/10/37D710576C8B518CA4C720F390E9BDE5.xml b/data/37/D7/10/37D710576C8B518CA4C720F390E9BDE5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d26b58105c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D7/10/37D710576C8B518CA4C720F390E9BDE5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Floristic inventory and distribution characteristics of algific talus slopes in a specific area of forest biodiversity in South Korea + + + +Author + +Lee, Jong-Won +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-8396 +Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Yun, Ho-Geun +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Hwang, Tae Young +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Kyungmin +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Jung, Se-Hoon +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +An, Jong Bin +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea +ajb8825@korea.kr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-12-18 + + +11 + + +113952 +113952 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 +1314-2828-11-e113952 +5B963235F71B550FA1E3BC1F0E590B10 + + + + +Thalictrum kemense Fr., 1817 + + + +Distribution +Subarctic to the Caucasus, North & North Central Japan + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D7/9E/37D79E219A865CF7818CC0A5EBA509A5.xml b/data/37/D7/9E/37D79E219A865CF7818CC0A5EBA509A5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b97e043348f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D7/9E/37D79E219A865CF7818CC0A5EBA509A5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ + + + +Taxonomic review of Gasterophilus (Oestridae, Gasterophilinae) of the world, with updated nomenclature, keys, biological notes, and distributions + + + +Author + +Li, Xin-Yu + + + +Author + +Pape, Thomas + + + +Author + +Zhang, Dong + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +891 + + +119 +156 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.891.38560 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.891.38560 +1313-2970-891-119 +84BE68FCAA9D43579DA0C81EEBA95E13 +FF4ED6C8A48258E684039DAAE4FC3C19 + + + + +Gasterophilus meridionalis (Pillers & Evans, 1926) + +Figs 2 +D-F + +, +5C, D +, +11E +, + +15 +D-F + +; Table 1 + + + + +Oestrus meridionalis +Pillers & Evans, 1926: 264. Type locality: Zimbabwe (as +"Rhodesia" +). + + + +Selected references. + +Zumpt (1965 +: 121); +Cogley (1991b) +; +Colwell et al. (2006 +: 36); +Colwell et al. (2007 +: 256). + + + +Diagnosis. +Male unknown. Antennal postpedicel long-oval. Facial plate setose. Wing completely hyaline. Crossvein dm-cu extremely weak, with only a faint trace; distance between crossveins r-m and dm-cu equal or less than length of r-m. Meron with unmodified setae. Legs black or black-brown. Abdomen ground color dark brown. Female sternite 8 longitudinally ridged in the middle and with a scallop-shaped apex. + + +Material examined. +SOUTH AFRICA • 2♀♀; Transvaal; Newington; 15 Aug. 1957; reared from third instar larvae by F. Zumpt; KZNM. + + +Hosts. + +Burchell's +zebra ( + +E. quagga burchellii + +). + + + +Distribution. + +Afrotropical +- Botswana, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mozambique, Namibia, Republic of the Congo, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D7/B1/37D7B1560A3E62A0637165026D72467A.xml b/data/37/D7/B1/37D7B1560A3E62A0637165026D72467A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..603143faed3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D7/B1/37D7B1560A3E62A0637165026D72467A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828--8013 + + + + +Trichogrammatoidea stammeri (Novicky, 1946) + + + + +Trichogramma stammeri +Novicky, 1946 + + + +Distribution +England + + +Notes +BMNH, det. Fursov, added here + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D7/C6/37D7C64E1840EE349DED7BA2A17E0A0F.xml b/data/37/D7/C6/37D7C64E1840EE349DED7BA2A17E0A0F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aaaa19e5355 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D7/C6/37D7C64E1840EE349DED7BA2A17E0A0F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Cricetidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +955 +1189 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + + +Oxymycterus amazonicus +Hershkovitz 1994 + + + + + + + +Oxymycterus amazonicus +Hershkovitz 1994 + +, +Fieldiana Zool., n. s., 79: 23 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +Brazil +, Pará State, right bank lower Rio Tapajós, Fordlândia; +03º40′S +, +55º30′W +. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Amazonian Hocicudo +. + + + + +Distribution: +Lower Amazon Basin, south of the Rio +Amazonas +between the Rios +Tocantins +and Madeira, C +Brazil +, as least as far south as NW +Mato Grosso +(per additional localities reported by Musser et al., 1998:239). + + + + +Discussion: +Considered a small size-class species, principally compared with + +O. nasutus + +; sister species to + +O. delator + +according to phylogenetic analysis of cytochrome +b +data ( +Hoffmann et al., 2002 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D7/D4/37D7D41C4E9FD417702695F058EA0340.xml b/data/37/D7/D4/37D7D41C4E9FD417702695F058EA0340.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..49a867f3751 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D7/D4/37D7D41C4E9FD417702695F058EA0340.xml @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Family +Cucujidae Latreille, 1802 + + + + +Cucujipes +Latreille, 1802: 210 [stem: Cucuj-]. Type genus: +Cucujus +Fabricius, 1775 [placed on the Official List of Generic Names in Zoology (ICZN 1994a)]. + + +*Biophloces +Motschulsky, 1849: 60 [stem: Biophloe-]. Type genus: +Biophloeus +Dejean, 1835 [nomen oblitum; this genus name is a senior synonym of the well-established name +Pediacus +Shuckard, 1839 nomen protectum; however since +Biophloeus +Dejean has not been used as valid after 1899 to our knowledge, we provide references to support the conservation of +Pediacus +as the valid name for this genus (Art. 23.9.1) (see Appendix 1)]. Comment: original vernacular name unavailable (Art. 11.7.2): not subsequently latinized. + + +Earophilidae +Gistel, 1856a: 375 [stem: Earophil-]. Type genus: +Earophilus +Gistel, 1856 [syn. of +Cucujus +Fabricius, 1775]. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D8/01/37D801E6531DCCE6F153BA4EE595FD45.xml b/data/37/D8/01/37D801E6531DCCE6F153BA4EE595FD45.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..96427e042f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D8/01/37D801E6531DCCE6F153BA4EE595FD45.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +Order Chiroptera - Family Pteropodidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +313 +350 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Pteropus hypomelanus +subsp. +satyrus +K. Andersen 1908 + + + + + +Discussion: + +subniger + +species group. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D8/CE/37D8CE5589D83ACEC370B315C010F86C.xml b/data/37/D8/CE/37D8CE5589D83ACEC370B315C010F86C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0ba91b71159 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D8/CE/37D8CE5589D83ACEC370B315C010F86C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ + + + +Order Chiroptera - Family Vespertilionidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +451 +529 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Eptesicus (Eptesicus) platyops +Thomas 1901 + + + + + + + +Eptesicus (Eptesicus) platyops +Thomas 1901 + +, +Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, 8: 31 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +Nigeria +, Western Region, +Lagos +. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: + +Lagos +Serotine + +. + + + + +Distribution: +Nigeria +, +Senegal +, Bioko ( +Equatorial Guinea +). + + + + +Conservation: +IUCN +2003 +IUCN +/ +SSC +Action Plan (2001) – Vulnerable. + + + + +Discussion: +Subgenus + +Eptesicus + +. Considered a subspecies of + +serotinus + +by Ibáñez and Valverde (1985), but no comparison with + +bottae + +was made. Also see +Hayman and Hill (1971) +, who treated + +platyops + +as a distinct species based on morphological differences. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D8/EA/37D8EA30C4505811945F44438064B7DB.xml b/data/37/D8/EA/37D8EA30C4505811945F44438064B7DB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bf8fdc22919 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D8/EA/37D8EA30C4505811945F44438064B7DB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ + + + +Confirmation of Tylototriton ziegleri Nishikawa, Matsui & Nguyen, 2013 in China, with discussion on the relationship between T. verrucosus Anderson, 1871 and T. panwaensis Grismer, Wood, Quah, Thura, Espinoza & Murdoch, 2019 (Caudata, Salamandridae) + + + +Author + +Liu, Shuo +Kunming Natural History Museum of Zoology, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China + + + +Author + +Hou, Mian +College of Continuing (Online) Education, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China + + + +Author + +Rao, Dingqi +Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China +raodq@mail.kiz.ac.cn + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2022 + +2022-05-19 + + +10 + + +82707 +82707 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e82707 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e82707 +1314-2828-10-e82707 +24909B00E01550FAB0F12F894269EA34 + + + + +Tylototriton ziegleri Nishikawa, Matsui & Nguyen, 2013 + + + +Materials + + +Type status: + +Other material +. + +Occurrence +: + +catalogNumber: +KIZ20210504 +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; + +Taxon +: + +scientificName: +Tylototriton +ziegleri +Nishikawa +, +Matsui +& +Nguyen +, 2013; family: +Salamandridae +; + +Location +: + +country: +China +; stateProvince: +Yunnan +; locality: + +Zhongzhai Village +, +Xiajinchang Township +, +Malipo County +, +Wenshan Prefecture + +; verbatimElevation: + + +1750 m + + +; verbatimCoordinates: +23°7′8″N +104°50′6″E +; + +Event +: + +eventRemarks: collected by +Shuo Liu +on +10 May 2021 +; +Record Level: +basisOfRecord: preserved specimen + +Type status: + +Other material +. + +Occurrence +: + +catalogNumber: +KIZ20210505 +; individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; lifeStage: +adult +; + +Taxon +: + +scientificName: +Tylototriton +ziegleri +Nishikawa +, +Matsui +& +Nguyen +, 2013; family: +Salamandridae +; + +Location +: + +country: +China +; stateProvince: +Yunnan +; locality: + +Zhongzhai Village +, +Xiajinchang Township +, +Malipo County +, +Wenshan Prefecture + +; verbatimElevation: + + +1750 m + + +; verbatimCoordinates: +23°7′8″N +104°50′6″E +; + +Event +: + +eventRemarks: collected by +Shuo Liu +on +10 May 2021 +; +Record Level: +basisOfRecord: preserved specimen + + + + + + + +Description + + +Description the specimens from China + +Morphometric data are provided in Table +2 +. Body moderately stout, medium in size (SVL 58.2-60.8 mm, TAL 68.0-69.7 mm). Head width almost equal to head length (HW/HL 0.96-1.05); head nearly hexagonal in shape in dorsal view, depressed, gently sloping in profile. Snout short, truncate, slightly beyond lower jaw. Nostril on anterior margin of snout, located notably closer to snout tip than to eye. Tongue oval, not notched distally, attached to mouth floor, but free laterally; vomerine tooth series in an inverted V-shape, converging anteriorly, but not reaching choanae. Labial fold absent; gular fold present, but weak; parotoids distinct, projecting posteriorly; costal folds absent. Dorsolateral supratemporal bony ridges on head protruding, beginning at the anterior corner of orbit continuing to anterior end of parotoid, posterior ends curved inside; mid-dorsal bony ridge on head short. Vertebral mid-dorsal ridge distinctly protruding, segmented, forming a row of tubercles, running from occiput region to the base of tail, separated from mid-dorsal bony ridge on head by a small gap. Rib nodules distinct, forming knob-like warts, relatively small, arranged in two longitudinal series on dorsolateral surfaces of dorsum from axilla to base of tail, counting 15-17 nodules on each side of body; rib nodules in the middle largest and decreasing anteriorly and posteriorly (Fig. +1 +). + +Limbs slender, tips of fore-limbs and hind-limbs overlapping when adpressed towards each other along body; fingers and toes free of webbing; relative finger lengths III ＞II ＞ I ≥ IV, relative toe lengths III ＞ IV ＞ II ＞ I ≥ V. Tail long, TAL/SVL 1.12-1.20; laterally compressed along entire length, tapering posteriorly, tip pointed, dorsal fin more distinct posteriorly, ventral ridge smooth. +Skin rough with fine granules, dense on dorsum and ventrum, but small and sparse on throat. Cloacal region slightly swollen, vent as a longitudinal slit, vent edges with numerous small transverse folds. + + +Colouration in life + +Dorsum almost uniformly black; venter slightly lighter than dorsum; bony ridges on head and vertebral ridge black, rib nodules black or reddish, only tips or most regions of fingers and toes, vent and ventral ridge of tail orange (Fig. +2 +). + + + +Ecological notes +The specimens were collected in a small stream in the forest at night, the water in the stream was shallow, and both sides of the stream were covered with vegetation. No eggs or larvae were found. + + +Distribution + +This species was recorded from Ha Giang and Cao Bang provinces, northern Vietnam; Malipo County, Yunnan Province and Jingxi County, Guangxi Autonomous Region, China (Fig. +3 +). However, the populations in Cao Bang and Jingxi may not represent the true + +Tylototriton ziegleri + +(see Discussion section). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D9/0C/37D90C77C6A679A689584998AE20ED14.xml b/data/37/D9/0C/37D90C77C6A679A689584998AE20ED14.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ed4c6cf3bc9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D9/0C/37D90C77C6A679A689584998AE20ED14.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Subfamily +Orphninae Erichson, 1847 + + + + +Orphnidae +Erichson, 1847a: 111 [stem: Orphn-]. Type genus: +Orphnus +W. S. MacLeay, 1819. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D9/7F/37D97F775622130425C3CD41B9FCB79A.xml b/data/37/D9/7F/37D97F775622130425C3CD41B9FCB79A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..127feda00aa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D9/7F/37D97F775622130425C3CD41B9FCB79A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part M) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +651 +689 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Mimosa gigas +Linnaeus + +, + +Flora Jamaicensis + +: 22. 1759 + + +. + + + +"Habitat [in Jamaica.]" + + + + +Neotype +(Panigrahi in +Taxon +34: 714. 1985): Herb. Linn. No. 1228.11 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + + +Entada gigas + +(L.) Fawc. & Rendle + +( +Fabaceae +: +Mimosoideae +). + + + + +Note: +Various authors (e.g. Johnston in +Sargentia +8: 136. 1949; Brenan in Hubbard & Milne-Redhead, +Fl. Trop. E. Africa, Leguminosae +1: 11. 1959) have treated either untraced Patrick Browne material, or his published description ( +Civ. Nat. Hist. Jamaica +: 362. 1758), as the type. However, Panigrahi (1985) treated what is clearly 1228.11 (LINN), material cultivated in the Botanic Garden in Uppsala, as the type. As + +M. gigas + +is validated solely by reference to +Browne's +work, the name should be typified from the context of that publication (Art. 7.7). However, as no relevant Browne material has been traced, and there is no illustration in his book, +Panigrahi's +choice is accepted as a neotypification (Art. 9.8). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/D9/AC/37D9AC15028A557FBFF96777E0B0353A.xml b/data/37/D9/AC/37D9AC15028A557FBFF96777E0B0353A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fbdd1ba36bd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/D9/AC/37D9AC15028A557FBFF96777E0B0353A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,397 @@ + + + +A review of the genus Orthocentrus Gravenhorst (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Orthocentrinae) from South Korea + + + +Author + +Humala, Andrei E. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8741-254X +Forest Research Institute, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 185910, Petrozavodsk, Russia + + + +Author + +Lee, Jong-Wook +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8684-3935 +Department of Sciences, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, Korea + + + +Author + +Choi, Jin-Kyung +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4059-0645 +Department of Science Education, Daegu National University of Education, Daegu, 42411, Korea +258aa@ynu.ac.kr + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2020 + +2020-02-27 + + +75 + + +15 +65 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.75.47006 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.75.47006 +1314-2607-75-15 +69D2154C21AC463DA0B4A56ACAF37FE3 +FD279561ED4452F38110D24FF51D441D +3698453 + + + + +2 +. +Orthocentrus brachycerus Humala & Lee +sp. nov. + + + + +Fig. 2 + + + +Description. + +Female. +Fore wing length 3.0-3.5 mm. + + +Face at level of antennal sockets 1.4 times as wide as high; face smooth, polished, sparsely and slightly punctate; eyes not setose; dorsal ridge of face in between antennal sockets with a median blunt low prominence; face profile straight except dorsally very slightly impressed; inner eye orbits slightly divergent ventrally; edge of clypeus straight; antennal sockets not on a distinct high shelf; subocular sulcus distinct, sharp, slightly bent towards occiput; maxillary palp reaching fore coxa. In dorsal view, head posteriorly concave, temples short; lateral ocellus separated from eye by its maximum diameter; POL 1.8 times as long as diameter of lateral ocellus; ocellar-ocular grooves present. Minimum distance between antennal sockets about 0.4 +x +diameter of socket; antenna very short, with 19 flagellomeres (n = 15) gradually shortening towards apex of antenna; basal flagellomere 1.5 times as long as wide and about 0.4 +x +of length of scape; scape slightly convex on inner surface, slightly concave on outer surface. + +Mesosoma polished; mesoscutum anteriorly with distinct notauli; in profile, scutellum weakly convex, metapleuron slightly convex; propodeum with posterior transverse carina complete, strong and raised between lateral longitudinal carinae, lateromedian longitudinal carinae complete, lateral longitudinal carinae distinct, propodeal spiracle small. +Legs robust; coxae polished, femora with coriaceous microsculpture, tibiae and tarsi coriaceous-granulate; hind femur 3.0 times as long as high, hind tibia 4.0 times as long as apically wide, with spine-like setae. +Wings not particularly narrow; fore wing without areolet; vein Rs nearly straight; vein Rs+2r meeting pterostigma at basal 0.45; vein cu-a opposite Rs&M; nervellus intercepted in lower third. +First tergite slightly widening posteriorly, 1.2 times as long as apically wide; coriaceous, with two distinct lateromedian longitudinal carinae and indistinct longitudinal striae, with transverse impressions originating at about middle of tergite, sloping posteriorly, meeting centrally. +Second tergite 0.9 times as long as posteriorly wide; coriaceous and longitudinally striate, sometimes with lateromedian longitudinal carinae in anterior half, anterior corners impressed and transverse groove near posterior margin bending anteriorly near lateral margins, forming a somewhat uplifted area medially with longitudinal striae; thyridia rounded. Third tergite with coriaceous microsculpture anteriorly; remainder of metasoma unsculptured, polished. Ovipositor thin, slightly upcurved, without subapical dorsal notch; ovipositor sheath narrow, with sparse setae. +Body setose except eyes, pronotum, mesopleuron and metapleuron; setae scattered on metasoma and posterior sides of coxae. +Blackish brown; face yellow, sometimes laterally infuscate; inner orbits broadly whitish-yellow up to occiput; antenna orange; malar area yellow posterior to malar sulcus and up to level of lower third of eye; mouthparts, fore and mid coxae, all trochanters and trochantelli yellowish creamy, remainder of fore and mid legs yellow; hind legs orange, posterior margins of tergites 1-4 brown. Sometimes lower mesopleuron and scutellum reddish-brown. + +Male. +Flagellum with 21 flagellomeres; face and frontal orbits yellow. Otherwise as in female. + + + +Biology. +Hosts unknown. + + +Etymology. + +Named from the Greek + +βραxύς + +(short) and + +κέρας + +(horn) after the short antenna. + + + +Comparison. + +Compared with the other species that have lenticular head, flattened and smooth face, short temples, and eyes glabrous, the fore wing areolet is absent and the flagellum with fewer than 20 flagellomeres, unlike in + +O. koreanus + +and + +O. consobrinus + +. From the allied + +O. leei + +it differs in the yellow face and frontal orbits up to the level of the lateral ocelli; the POL 1.8 times as long as diameter of an ocellus. + + + +Material examined. + + + +Holotype + +: female; +South Korea +, +GB +: +Daegu-si +, +Dalseo-gu +, +Daegok-dong +, +Daegusumogwon +, +35°48'3.26"N +, +128°31'15.3"E +, +27.VII-8.VIII.2011 +, +J.W. Lee +leg. (DNUE-0496). + + + + + +Paratypes + +: +South Korea +, +GB +: +1♀ +, +Daegu-si +, +Dalseo-gu +, +Daegok-dong +, +Daegu +Arboretum +, + +88 m + +, +35°47'38.6"N +, +128°31'33.5"E +, +4-18.IV.2012 +, +S.G. Kang +leg. (DNUE-0120); +1 ♂ +, Bongjeongsa +10-11.VII.1998 +, +J.W. Lee +leg. (DNUE-0135); +GG +: +3 ♀ +, Pocheon-si, Soheul-eup, Jikdong-ri, Korean National Arboretum, +Gwangeung Forest +, MTII, + +123 m + +, +37°45'22"N +, +127°9'48.9"E +, MT, +15.VII-2.VIII.2013 +, +S.Y. Park +, +J.O. Lim +& +J.S. Lim +leg. (DNUE); +1♀ +, Pocheon-si, Soheul-eup, Jikdong-ri, Korean National Arboretum, +Gwangeung Forest +, MTII, + +120 m + +, +37°45'22"N +, +127°9'48.9"E +, MT, +28.VI-15.VII.2013 +, +S.Y. Park +, +J.O. Lim +& +J.S. Lim +leg. (ZIN); +1♂ +, +Schihung-si +, +Mt. Chongsu +, +22.VIII.1988 +J.W. Lee +leg. (DNUE-0481); +GN +: +1♀ +, +Dapcheon-ri +, +Ibanseong-myeon +, +Jinju-si +, MTIII, +27.VI-4.VII.2005 +, +B.K. Ahn +leg. (ZIN-0376); +GW +: +2♀ +, +Chuncheon-si +, +Sanong-dong +, +Gwangwon Provincial Arboretum +, +30.VIII-17.IX.2013 +, +I.G. Kim +leg. (DNUE); +2♀ +, +Chuncheon-si +, +Sanong-dong +, +Gwangwon Provincial Arboretum +, +17.VII-1.VIII-2013 +, +I.G. Kim +leg. (DNUE); +1♀ +, +Heungeop-myeon +, +Maeji-ri +, +Yeosedae +gyonae ungoleong yeop, +37°16'53"N +, +127°54'02"E +, MT, +19.V-6.VI.2011 +, +J.W. Lee +leg. (DNUE-0243); +JB +: +2♀ +, +Wanju-gun +, +Dongsang-myeon +, +Daea-ri +, +San +1-2, +Daea +, +35°58'24.24"N +, +127°18'13.53"E +, MT, +16-31.VIII.2013 +, +J.M. Park +leg (DNUE); +1♀ +, +Iksansi Sinyongdong +, +Wongwang University +, +35°57'N +, +126°57'E +, MT, +21.VII-17.VIII.2006 +, +J.W. Lee +leg. (ZIN-0253); +JN +: +1♀ +, +Kwangju-si Buk-gu +, +Geumgok-dong +, +Mudeungsan National Park +, +Wonhyosa +, +35°57'N +, +126°57'E +, MT, +26.VI-27.VII.2013 +, +J.K. Choi +leg. (ZIN-0108) + +. + + + +Distribution. +South Korea (GB, GG, GN, GW, JB, JN). + + +Figure 2. + +Orthocentrus brachycerus + +sp. nov. Holotype. +A +Habitus in lateral view +B +head in frontal view +C +head and mesosoma in lateral view +D +head in dorsal view +E +scutellum and propodeum in dorsal view +F +first and second tergites in dorsal view. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DA/06/37DA060EFF562AC2CCC26830546D437B.xml b/data/37/DA/06/37DA060EFF562AC2CCC26830546D437B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..180504a5769 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DA/06/37DA060EFF562AC2CCC26830546D437B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ + + + +Pseudogramma xanthum, a new replacement name for a serranid fish from the subtropical South Pacific Ocean with description of the species. + + + +Author + +John E. Randall + + + +Author + +Carole C. Baldwin + + + +Author + +Jeffrey T. Williams + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2002 + +40 + + +1 +8 + + + + +http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:891FBD83-2857-4BC2-A93C-AA70FB2E9020 + +journal article +z00040p001 + + + + +Pseudogramma xanthum +, +nomen novum +(Figure 1, Table 1) + + + + +Pseudogramma australis australis Randall and Baldwin +, 1997 (type locality Temoe Atoll). + + + + + +Holotype +: + +BPBM +13531 + +, 39.1 mm, +Tuamotu Archipelago, Gambier Group, Temoe Atoll +( +23°20’S +, +134°30’W +), +N side of seaward reef +, small cave, 41 m, +rotenone +, +J.E. Randall and D.B. Cannoy +, + +16 +December 1970 + +. + + + + + +Additional material examined: + + +BMNH +1996.6.27.1 + +, 41.0 mm, +Pitcairn Island, coral rubble and stone bottom, 99-102 m, station 6 +, +dredge haul +17, +crew of “Pele” +, +20 October 1967 + +; + + +BPBM +37393 + +, 4:22.4-35.0 mm, same data as holotype + +; + + +BPBM +16893 + +, 33.1 mm, +Pitcairn Island, N side off Gannet Ridge, coral reef +, 40-44.5 m, +rotenone +, +J.E. Randall, D.B. Cannoy, J.R. Haywood, R.R. Costello, J.D. Bryant, and S.R. Christian +, +6 January 1971 + +; + + +BPBM +13974 + +, 2: 22.5-26.0 mm, +Cook Islands +, +Rarotonga, off oil tanker buoy near harbor entrance +, 23-30.5 m, +rotenone +, +J.E. Randall and D.B. Cannoy +, +11 March 1971 + +; + + +USNM +327795 + +, 3: 26-27 mm, +Tonga +, +Ha’apai Group, Ofolanga Island, SW side +( +19°36’15”S +, +174°28’15”W +), +deep reef slope with sand channel at base and steep dropoff at end +, 21-32 m, +rotenone +, +J.T. Williams, B.B Collette, G.D. Johnson, D.G. Smith, C.C. Baldwin, and E.A. Powers +, +12 November 1993 + +. + + + +Diagnosis: Dorsal rays VII, 19-21; anal rays III, 16-18 (usually 17); pectoral rays 14- 15 (usually 15); one incomplete lateral line, pored scales 28-32; longitudinal scale series 50-52; gill rakers 6 + 10 or 11; a slender triangular dermal flap dorsally on eye of adults; tubular anterior nostril reaching about half way to posterior nostril when laid back; head length 40.3-43.1% SL; snout length 7.5-7.9% SL; orbit diameter 9.0-10.2% SL; upper-jaw length 19.3-21.1% SL; predorsal length 38.2-40.3% SL; head and body yellow in life with rows of large white blotches, a pale-edged brown spot on opercle; dark red dots on head, many in rows, and scattered dark red dots on body; largest specimen, 39.1mm SL. + + +Description: Dorsal rays VII, 20 (19-21); anal rays III, 17 (16-18); pectoral rays 15 (14-15), all rays branched in adults; pelvic rays I, 5; principal caudal rays 17; upper procurrent caudal rays 4; lower procurrent caudal rays 3; one incomplete lateral line, the pored scales 30 (28-32); longitudinal scale series 50 (about 50-52); scale rows directly above lateral line to origin of dorsal fin about 6; scale rows directly below lateral line to origin of anal fin about 17 (rows partly overlapping and difficult to count); gill rakers 6 + 11 (6 + 11 or 12); pseudobranchial filaments 10 (7-9); branchiostegal rays 7; vertebrae 10+16. +Body depth 3.55 (3.6-4.25) in SL; body width 1.8 (1.6-2.0) in body depth; head length 2.45 (2.3-2.5) in SL; snout length 5.4 (5.3-5.6) in head length; orbit diameter 4.3 (4.1-4.6) in head length; interorbital narrow and nearly flat, the least fleshy width 11.5 (10.9-12.5) in head length; caudal-peduncle depth 3.2 (3.25-3.5) in head length; caudal-peduncle length 5.35 (5.25-5.45) in head length. +Mouth terminal or with lower jaw slightly projecting, oblique, forming an angle of about 35° to horizontal axis of head, and large, the maxilla extending well beyond a vertical at rear edge of eye, the upper-jaw length 2.1 (1.95-2.15) in head length; a small, triangular, ventrally-projecting, bony process posteriorly on maxilla; a small fixed incurved canine tooth (sometimes a close-set pair) anteriorly on each side of upper jaw; an inner band of small, conical, inwardly depressible teeth at front of upper jaw in about 6 irregular rows, progressively longer medially, the innermost symphyseal teeth longer than canines, though more slender; band of teeth narrowing to 1 or 2 irregular rows posteriorly in jaw; dentition of lower jaw similar to upper but without the fixed canines, with only 4-5 rows of teeth anteriorly, the largest teeth of inner row continuing along side of jaw; vomer with a V-shaped patch of small conical teeth in 3 irregular rows; palatines with a long band of small conical teeth in 1-2 irregular rows. Tongue long and slender, reaching slightly anterior to vomerine teeth. +Opercle with 3 flat spines covered by scales; posterior margin of preopercle with a strong spine projecting obliquely downward, its base at level of lower edge of eye. A slender triangular flap longer than pupil extending upward from dorsal surface of eye (small and more triangular on smallest paratypes). +Tubular anterior nostril near base of upper lip at level of lower edge of pupil, reaching about half distance to posterior nostril when laid back; posterior nostril at edge of orbit, slightly dorsal to anterior nostril, and vertically oval with a slight rim. A pair of large pores in midinterorbital space with a median pore behind; 12 other large pores encircling orbit; 4 large pores on mandible continuing as 7 pores along edge of preopercle. +Scales on body small and adherent, their surface with prominent horizontal ridges, those posterior to about tenth lateral-line scale rhomboid and ctenoid, the middle cteni longest; small cycloid scales on nape extending into posterior interorbital space; small cycloid scales on opercle and cheek; rest of head naked; small scales on about basal half of fins except pelvics where only basally; no scales in axil of pectoral fins; lateral line paralleling dorsal contour of body, ending below middle of base of soft portion of dorsal fin. +Origin of dorsal fin above fifth lateral-line scale, the predorsal length 2.6 (2.5-2.6) in SL; first dorsal spine 5.6 (5.4-5.75) in head length; fifth or sixth dorsal spines longest, 4.0 (3.8-3.95) in head length; last dorsal spine 4.95 (4.5-4.85) in head length; longest dorsal soft ray 2.85 (2.6-2.75) in head length; origin of anal fin below base of third dorsal soft ray, the preanal length 1.5 (1.5-1.55) in SL; first anal spine 6.9 (7.l-8.55) in head length; second anal spine clearly largest, 4.7 (4.2-4.8) in head length; longest anal soft ray 2.8 (2.55-2.8) in head length; caudal fin rounded and small, 1.8 (1.6-1.5) in head length; middle pectoral rays longest, 1.3 (1.2-1.3)in head length; origin of pelvic fins anterior to base of pectorals, the prepelvic distance 2.95 (2.8-3.1) in SL; second and third pelvic soft rays longest, 2.65 (2.6-2.7) in head. +Color of holotype entirely pale yellowish. Color when fresh light yellow, shading to white on abdomen, chest, and ventral half of head, with two rows of indistinct pale blotches larger than pupil, one positioned midlaterally and one on lower side, scattered dark red dots (red with dark brown centers) on body; opercle with irregular pale-edged brown blotch rimmed with dark red dots; numerous dark red dots on dorsal half of head, those on lower half of head more widely separated but most arranged in lines, four of which pass ventrally from anterior half of eye, the first three crossing lips onto chin; fins light yellowish, the dorsal with a few dark red dots on base. +A color photo (by JTW) of a specimen from Tonga is essentially the same as that of the holotype (Fig. 1) from the Tuamotu Archipelago. + + +Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the Greek adjective xanthos, meaning yellow, in reference to the ground color of the body. + + + +Remarks: The species redescribed above was first treated as a subspecies of +Pseudogramma australis +, but was mistakenly named +P. a. australis +. The name +P. australis +has been shown above to be occupied by the Easter Island species and does not apply to the western species. The subspecies +P. a. pasquensis +is a junior synonym of +P. australis +. Thus there is no name available for the western species of the +P. australis +group, and we provide +P. xanthum +as the new replacement name for +P. a. australis +. + + +Pseudogramma australis +and +P. xanthum +have the same basic color pattern, but differ in ground color, red for the former and yellow for the latter. However, we have records of the life color of +P. xanthum +from only Temoe and Tonga. In addition to the meristic differences between +P. xanthum +and +P. australis +discussed for the two subspecies of +australis +in Randall & Baldwin (1997: tables 1-3), and the smaller size of +xanthum +, we note the following differences in proportional measurements: +P. xanthum +has a larger head (40.7- 43.1% SL, compared to 37.0-39.4% for +P. australis +); longer snout (7.5-7.9% SL, compared to 6.7-7.4% for +P. australis +); longer upper jaw (19.3-21.1% SL, compared to 18.5- 19.7%); and longer predorsal length (38.2-40.3% SL, compared to 36.4-38.2%). The eye size of +P. xanthum +is larger (9.0-10.2% SL, compared to 8.4-9.1%), but this is probably due to the smaller size of the specimens of +P. xanthum +. From the tables, +P. xanthum +seems to have a shorter caudal fin, but only three specimens could be measured due to the poor condition of most specimens. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DA/52/37DA52E25DCE3293735808C6A36FD65B.xml b/data/37/DA/52/37DA52E25DCE3293735808C6A36FD65B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..420532a65ae --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DA/52/37DA52E25DCE3293735808C6A36FD65B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@ + + + +The Mecyclothorax beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Moriomorphini) of Haleakala-, Maui: Keystone of a hyperdiverse Hawaiian radiation + + + +Author + +Liebherr, James K. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +544 + + +1 +407 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.544.6074 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.544.6074 +1313-2970-544-1 +C5978BD0145B40F8ACDEB27371B7B9A4 +C5978BD0145B40F8ACDEB27371B7B9A4 + + + + +Taxon +classification Animalia Coleoptera Carabidae + + + + +(081) +Mecyclothorax crassuloides +sp. n. +Figs 96 +G-I +, 97D, 98D, 100B, 101 + + + + +Diagnosis +. + + +This species (Fig. 100B) and +Mecyclothorax crassulus +(Fig. 100C) are cryptic, sibling species, and based on synapomorphous configurations of the male aedeagal median lobes (Fig. 96 +G-J +), they are sister species. They can be diagnosed externally by microsculpture only, with this species characterized by the elytra bearing indistinct isodiametric sculpticells in transverse rows on the disc, those sculpticells visible only outside any areas of reflected microscope light. On the elytral apex, the isodiametric sculpticells are more visible, but they are flat without upraised centers. The male aedeagal median lobe is much more robust in this species, broader dorsoventrally with a broader apex (Fig. 96I). The aedeagal internal sac is also larger, in keeping with the lobe dimensions, and more heavily spiculated. Setal formula 2 1 2 0. Standardized body length 4.5-5.1 mm. + + + +Description + +(n = 5). Head capsule with frontal grooves moderately deep, broad, the convexity laterad groove broad and low, groove terminated at short carina mesad anterior supraorbital seta; dorsal impression of neck slightly concave; eyes convex, ocular ratio = 1.54-1.58, moderately large, ocular lobe ratio = 0.74-0.80; labral anterior margin angularly emarginate 1/8 length; antennae filiform, antennomeres 2-3 with sparse pelage of short setae; mentum tooth with sides acute, apex tightly rounded. Pronotum moderately transverse, MPW/PL = 1.20-1.30, distinctly constricted basally, MPW/BPW = 1.67-1.80; hind angle acute, lateral margin subparallel for 0.1 +x +pronotal length; median base depressed relative to disc, ~13 small, isolated punctures each side; basal margin straight, extended posteriorly near hind angles; median longitudinal impression very finely incised, within slight depression of disc, crossed by indistinct transverse wrinkles; anterior transverse impression broad, deep, may be crossed by distinct longitudinal wrinkles; anterior callosity slightly convex, smooth or with minute longitudinal wrinkles; front angles slightly produced, tightly rounded; apical pronotal width much greater than basal width, APW/BPW = 1.12-1.20; lateral marginal depression narrow, edge upturned, slightly broader at front angle; laterobasal depression with slightly irregular surface as on median base, continuous with lateral depression. Proepisternum with 5 minute punctures along hind marginal groove; prosternal process narrowly, evenly depressed medially. Elytra distinctly ovoid, widest behind midlength; disc slightly depressed along suture, sides distinctly sloped to marginal depression; basal groove briefly curved to subangulate humerus, the humeral angles proximate relative to elytral width, MEW/HuW = 2.31-2.43; parascutellar seta present; parascutellar striole brief, with 3-4 punctures, deep, continuous between punctures; sutural interval convex throughout length, disc depressed each side at sutural stria; discal striae 2-4 obsolete, partially traceable by very small punctulae or by cuticular pigment dots associate with strial development, lateral striae 5-7 absent (again their course visible only by serial dots of pigment associated with strial development); both 8th interval laterad 7th stria and fused apical portion of striae 5 + 7 slightly, broadly convex; 2 dorsal elytral setae at 0.26 +x +and 0.54 +-0.65x +elytral length, setal impressions very small, shallow, spanning +1/4 +of interval 3; lateral elytral setae arranged in anterior series of 7 setae and posterior series of 6 setae; elytral marginal depression broadest outside humerus, margin upturned in basal half, beaded near subapical sinuation; subapical sinuation shallow, more abruptly incurved anteriorly. Mesepisternum with ~10 large punctures in 2-3 rows; metepisternal width to length ratio = 0.63; metepisternum/metepimeron suture distinct. Abdomen with irregular lateral wrinkles on ventrites 1-5, lateral depressions on ventrites 3-6; suture between ventrites 2 and 3 partially effaced; apical male ventrite with 2 marginal setae and apical female ventrite with 4 equally spaced setae and median trapezoid of 4 subequal, short setae. Legs-metatarsomere 1/metatibial length ratio = 0.20; metatarsomere 4 length along outer lobe 1.3 +x +medial tarsomere length, apical and subapical setae present; metatarsal dorsolateral sulci broad, shallow, basal tarsomere medially subcarinate. Microsculpture of vertex a transverse mesh, sculpticell breadth 2 +-3x +length; pronotal disc with shallow transverse mesh to transverse lines, glossy in part, median base glossy with indistinct transverse sculpticells laterally; metasternum with transverse mesh; laterobasal abdominal ventrites with swirling isodiametric and transverse microsculpture. Coloration of vertex rufous with a piceous cast; antennomere 1 rufoflavous, 2-11 rufobrunneous in fully melanized individuals, antennomeres 1-3 rufoflavous in less melanized beetles; pronotal disc rufous, lateral margins concolorous, base and apex rufopiceous; proepipleuron rufoflavous, proepisternum rufoflavous dorsally, rufobrunneous ventrally; elytral disc rufous with a dark brunneous cast, sutural interval rufous basally, rufoflavous apically; elytral interval 9 +rufopiceous +, marginal depression rufoflavous; elytral apex rufoflavous only on interval 8 and along apical margin; elytral epipleuron flavous, metepisternum rufoflavous; abdomen rufoflavous; metafemur flavous with smoky brunneous apex; metatibia rufobrunneous with piceous cast. + + +Male genitalia (n = 2). Aedeagal median lobe very broad basally, attenuated apically with sinuous ventral surface, distance from parameral articulation to tip 2.4 +x +basal depth (Fig. 96G, I), apex thick at distal end of ostial opening, sinuously narrowed to acutely pointed tip; base of median lobe nearly symmetrical in ventral outline (Fig. 96H) but left margin broadly curved 90° rightward before bluntly rounded tip in this view; internal sac with broadly convex dorsal lobe near base of sac, a suggested dorsal ostial microtrichial patch on right side at base, and ventral surface broadly covered with dark macro- and microspicules (Fig. 96I); flagellar plate elongate, length 0.50 +x +parameral articulation-tip distance. + + +Female reproductive tract (n = 1). Bursa copulatrix columnar with rounded apex, broader base, length 1.0 mm, apical breadth 0.39 mm, basal breadth 0.48 mm (Fig. 97D); bursal walls translucent with shagreened surface and very fine wrinkles; gonocoxite 1 with 2-4 apical fringe setae, a thick, curved seta at medioapical angle and 6-8 smaller setae along medial surface (Fig. 98D); gonocoxite 2 subtriangular with subacuminate tip, 2 lateral ensiform setae, apical nematiform setae on medioventral surface at 0.78 +x +gonocoxite length. + + + +Holotype. + +Female (CUIC) labeled: HI: Maui Haleakala N.P. / Kipahulu Vy. Central / Pali Tr. 1200 m el. / 29-IV-1991 sifting / moss & leaf litter // J.K. Liebherr / A.C. Medeiros, / Jr. collectors // HOLOTYPE / +Mecyclothorax +/ +crassuloides +/ Liebherr / det. J.K. Liebherr 2015 (black-margined red label). + + + +Paratypes. + +HI: Haleakala N.P., Northeast Rift, Midcamp Bog Cabin, sift +Metrosideros +humus, 1665 m el., 18-v-1993 lot 01, Liebherr/Medeiros (CUIC, 1), lot 05 Liebherr/Medeiros (CUIC, 1), New Greensword Bog, sift +Metrosideros +humus, 1850 m el., 17-v-1993 lot 05, Liebherr/Medeiros (CUIC, 1); Hana For. Res., Horseshoe Bog nr. Haleakala N.P., +Cheirodendron +/ +Clermontia +, 1810 m el., 11-v-1998 lot 05, Ewing (CUIC, 1), Upper Hana, [= nr. Heleleikeoha State Fence Camp], 1730 m el., 14-xi-1973, Whittle (BPBM, 1); Koolau For. Res., Hanawi N.A.R., Kuhiwa Vy. E rim, pyrethrin fog +Metrosideros +, 880 m el., 09-vi-1999 lot 06, Polhemus (NMNH, 1), lot 09 Polhemus (NMNH, 1), pyrethrin fog steep streambank, 880 m el., 10-vi-1999 lot 01, Polhemus (NMNH, 1), Poouli Cabin, beat vegetation, 1590 m el., 05-v-1998 lot 04, Ewing (CUIC, 1), pyrethrin fog +Metrosideros +/moss, 1590 m el., 05-v-1998 lot 01, Liebherr (CUIC, 1). + + + +Etymology. + +The adjectival species epithet +crassuloides +is derived from the Latin +crassus +; thick, heavy ( +Jaeger 1955 +). This species and +Mecyclothorax crassulus +below are named to follow +Mecyclothorax crassus +of West Maui ( +Sharp 1903 +), a closely related species. As +crassulus +is the diminutive of +crassus +, then the epithet +crassuloides +used here means resembling a diminutive +crassus +. + + + +Distribution and habitat. + +Mecyclothorax crassuloides +is distributed from +Hanawī +through the +Hana +Bogs to +Kīpahulu +Valley (Fig. 101). It is known from 880-1590 m elevation in +Kuhiwa +Valley, and at 1200 m elevation within +Kīpahulu +Valley. The bog localities range in elevation 1665-1850 m. It has been collected in leaf litter, humus, and moss associated with +'ōhi'a +, as well as associated with +Cheirodendron +('ōlapa), +Clermontia +(oha), and +Leptecophylla +(pūkiawe). The 11 separate collecting events of this species have each included only single specimens; unusual among +Haleakala +Mecyclothorax +spp. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DA/B6/37DAB670F675B36A2805D0C2F763C28D.xml b/data/37/DA/B6/37DAB670F675B36A2805D0C2F763C28D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d9be9f1e903 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DA/B6/37DAB670F675B36A2805D0C2F763C28D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +New Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) records with new collection data from New Brunswick, Canada: Paederinae + + + +Author + +Webster, Reginald P. + + + +Author + +DeMerchant, Ian + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +186 + + +273 +292 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.186.2504 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.186.2504 +1313-2970-186-273 + + + + +Lathrobium (Lathrobium) spissicorne Casey, 1905 +Map 6 + + + +Material examined. + +New Brunswick, Charlotte Co., near New River, +45.2118°N +, +66.6179°W +, 7.VII.2006, R. P. Webster, mixed forest, margin small pond, treading +Carex +hummock into water (1 ♀, RWC). Queens Co., W of Jemseg at "Trout Creek", +45.8240°N +, +66.1220°W +, 4.VI.2004, R. P. Webster, silver maple swamp, margin of vernal pond in moist leaf litter on muddy soil (1 ♀, RWC); Grand Lake near Scotchtown, +45.8762°N +, +66.1816°W +, 5.VI.2004, 1.VII.2004, 25.V.2006, R. P. Webster, lakeshore, old (sand) dune with oaks, under dead fish and under drift material (3 ♂, 1 ♀, NBM, RWC). Sunbury Co., Burton, Sunpoke Lake, +45.7665°N +, +66.5545°W +, 15.V.2004, R. P. Webster, (red) oak and (red and silver) maple forest, in leaf litter (3 ♂, RWC). + + + +Map 6. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of +Lathrobium spissicorne +. + + + + +Collection and habitat data. + +Lathrobium spissicorne +was found in mixed forests, a silver maple swamp, along a lakeshore, and in a mature forest with red oak ( +Quercus rubra +L.), red maple, and silver maple. Adults were found in a +Carex +hummock on a pond margin, in moist leaf litter on vernal pond margin, and in leaf litter on the forest floor. Some adults were found under drift material and under a dead fish on a lakeshore. This species was collected during May, June, and July. + + + +Distribution in Canada and Alaska. + +ON, QC, NB, PE ( +Campbell and Davies 1991 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DA/FA/37DAFAC8B08221EEEA5EDBB0E33BE864.xml b/data/37/DA/FA/37DAFAC8B08221EEEA5EDBB0E33BE864.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f66be1c4b18 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DA/FA/37DAFAC8B08221EEEA5EDBB0E33BE864.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Tribe +Hypophlaeini Billberg, 1820 + + + + +Hypophlaeides +Billberg, 1820a: 33 [stem: Hypophlae-]. Type genus: +Hypophlaeus +Fabricius, 1790 [syn. of +Corticeus +Piller and Mitterpacher, 1783]. + + + +Corticeini + +Boddy, 1965: 144 [stem: Cortice-]. Type genus: +Corticeus +Piller and Mitterpacher, 1783. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DB/0B/37DB0B723E785892A74CCEF1FF50E8D3.xml b/data/37/DB/0B/37DB0B723E785892A74CCEF1FF50E8D3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1775d346fd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DB/0B/37DB0B723E785892A74CCEF1FF50E8D3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ + + + +Three new species of the genus Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Miracinae) from India and Saudi Arabia + + + +Author + +Ghramh, Hamed A. + + + +Author + +Ahmad, Zubair + + + +Author + +Pandey, Kavita + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2019 + +889 + + +37 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.889.34942 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.889.34942 +1313-2970-889-37 +B29D952D7108449C9DBEAFB4FE04CA89 +97652F5F57DA58CCAE2625BB3A3049F9 + + + + +Centistidea cosmopteryxi Ahmad & Pandey +sp. nov. +Figs 5-10 + + + +Material examined. + +Holotype +: INDIA • ♀; Uttar Pradesh, Etah, 5.x.2004; ex. + +Cosmopteryx phaeogastra + +(Meyr) on + +Phaseolus cylindrica + +(coll. Z Ahmad) (ZDAMU). +Paratype +: 1♀, with same data as holotype (HB-139, ZDAMU). + + + +Diagnosis. + +Following the key to East Palaearctic and Oriental species of the genus + +Centistidea + +Rohwer ( +van Achterberg and Mehernejad 2002 +; +Ranjith et al. 2018 +), + +C. cosmopteryxi + +sp. nov. keys with + +C. sii + +( +Maeto +, 1995) on the presence of yellowish head, notauli only anteriorly impressed and finely crenulate, and vein 1-R1 of fore wing distinctly vein-like. This combination of characters is quite unique among the genus + +Centistedea + +. However, the new species differs in the following characters: (i) wings slightly infuscate (wings hyaline in + +C. sii + +), (ii) length of eye 1.8 +x +temple (dorsal length of eye 1.10 +x +temple in + +C. sii + +), (iii) length of first tergites 2.3 +x +its maximum width and 3.2 +x +its apical width (length of first tergites 3-3.5 +x +its maximum width and 3.2 +x +its apical width in + +C. sii + +). When considering the similarities of characters like vein 1-CU1 of fore wing 0.9 +x +as long as vein 2-CU1 and scutellum with oval pits medio-posteriorly, then the new species runs near to + +C. mogra + +( +Papp 1987 +). However, it differs in the following characters: (i) sub-alar depression of fore wings finely aciculate (sub-alar depression of fore wings smooth in + +C. mogra + +), (ii) propodeum with some rugosity on anterior part of median longitudinal carina (propodeum without any rugosity on anterior part of median longitudinal carina in + +C. mogra + +), (iii) vein 1-CU1 slightly shorter than 2-CU1 (vein 1-CU1 of fore wing as long as 2-CU1 in + +C. mogra + +), and (iv) mesonotum complete dark brown (mesonotum tinged with brown in + +C. mogra + +). + + + +Description. + +Holotype +: Female body length: 2.0 mm; length of forewing: 2.1 mm; length of antenna: 2.0 mm. + + +Head: +1.9 +x +as wide as long in dorsal view (12: 23); length of eye 1.8 +x +temple (9: 5) in dorsal view: head and vertex indistinctly punctate; OOL; POL: AOL: OD = 4: 2: 1: 2; inner margin of eyes subparallel; face distinctly convex medially, flattened laterally smooth; clypeus smooth and evenly convex; malar space 0.9 +x +as long as basal width of the mandible; antennae with 14 segments, F1 ca. 5 +x +as long as wide, 1.1 times longer than F2, penultimate flagellomere 2.5-3.0 +x +as long as wide and apical flagellomere pointed. + + +Mesosoma: +1.5 +x +as long as wide; mesoscutum shiny with few distinct punctures, notauli only anteriorly impressed and finely crenulate; prescutellar furrow distinct as a narrow groove with few crenulations; scutellum almost smooth and shiny, medio-posterior depression of scutellum oval and moderately close to each other; propodeum almost smooth (except few rugosity on anterior part of median longitudinal carina) with a complete median longitudinal carina bifurcate posteriorly near the end of propodeum, median carina of propodeum absent behind level of costulae; pair of membranous white spots at side of pronotum distinct, mesopleuron and metapleuron smooth. + + +Wings: +Pterostigma with a long slender, apical expansion, 2.4 +x +longer than wide; vein 1-R1 of fore wing distinctly vein-like; vein r issuing from its middle; vein 1-M 1.6 +x +longer than vein m-cu; vein 1-CU1 of fore wing 0.9 +x +as long as vein 2-CU1. + + +Legs: +Hind coxa smooth, lengths of hind femur, tibia, and basitarsus of hind leg 3.0, 7.0, and 4.5 +x +their maximum widths, respectively; length of hind tibial spurs 0.26 +x +and 0.33 +x +as long as hind basitarsus. + + +Metasoma: +Ca. 2.0 +x +as long as wide; first tergite smooth, widening medially, distinctly narrowing basally and apically, 3.2 +x +as long as its maximum width; T2 subtriangular, smooth, laterally membranous and longitudinally striated; T3 longitudinally striated; ovipositor sheaths setose at apical half 0.1 +x +as long as forewing; hypopygium smooth medially folded, truncate apically, weakly sclerotized and setose. + + +Color: +Yellowish brown except for the following: antennae, mesonotum, and metasoma dark brown to blackish brown; propleuron, mesopleuron, metapleuron, and ovipositor brown; T3, laterotergites yellow; wings infuscate. + + + +Figures 5-10. + +Centistidea cosmopteryxi + +sp. nov. +5 +body profile, dorsal view +6 +head, frontal view +7 +mesosoma, dorsal view +8 +metasoma, dorsal view +9 +metasomal T1 and T2 +10 +forewing. + + + + +Male. +Unknown. + + +Host. + + +Cosmopteryx phaeogastra + +(Meyrick). + + + +Distribution. +India: Uttar Pradesh. + + +Etymology. +The new species is named after its host insect. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DB/19/37DB191BC6556A7855EEA8D459A00E40.xml b/data/37/DB/19/37DB191BC6556A7855EEA8D459A00E40.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c83e03e7de6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DB/19/37DB191BC6556A7855EEA8D459A00E40.xml @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +†Subtribe +Eopaussina Luna de Carvalho, 1951 + + + + +*Eopaussina +Darlington, 1950: 84 [stem: Eopauss-]. Type genus: +Eopaussus +Wasmann, 1926. Comment: unavailable family-group name, proposed after 1930 without description or bibliographic reference to such a description (Art. 13.1). + + +Eopaussinae +Luna de Carvalho, 1951: 22 [stem: Eopauss-]. Type genus: +Eopaussus +Wasmann, 1926. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DB/37/37DB3724992F59AEB456A72F03412E9A.xml b/data/37/DB/37/37DB3724992F59AEB456A72F03412E9A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a5e46009405 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DB/37/37DB3724992F59AEB456A72F03412E9A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ + + + +Cirrhilabrus finifenmaa (Teleostei, Labridae), a new species of fairy wrasse from the Maldives, with comments on the taxonomic identity of C. rubrisquamis and C. wakanda + + + +Author + +Tea, Yi-Kai +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2146-2592 +School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia & Ichthyology, Australian Museum Research Institute, 1 William Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia +teayk1@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Najeeb, Ahmed +Maldives Marine Research Institute, Ministry of Fisheries Marine Resources and Agriculture, Male 20025, Maldives + + + +Author + +Rowlett, Joseph +Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, 60605, USA + + + +Author + +Rocha, Luiz A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4011-569X +Department of ichthyology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118, USA + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2022 + +2022-03-08 + + +1088 + + +65 +80 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1088.78139 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1088.78139 +1313-2970-1088-65 +6404BD8520F74017ADA8113C2DBF97EB +70E248873DD05572A4EDC5BAB3AE261E + + + + +Cirrhilabrus rubrisquamis Randall & Emery, 1983 + + + + +Rosy-scaled Fairy Wrasse Fig. 1 + + + + +Cirrhilabrus rubrisquamis +Randall & Emery, 1983: 21; fig. 1 (description); +Winterbottom et al. 1989 +: 53; pl VII-E (checklist, fishes of the Chagos Archipelago); +Winterbottom and Anderson 1997 +: 15 (revised checklist, fishes of the Chagos Archipelago) + + + +Holotype. + + +Cirrhilabrus rubrisquamis + +: ROM 35932, 40.6 mm SL, juvenile, Isla Fouquet, Peros Banhos Atoll, Chagos Archipelago ( +5°21'3"S +, +71°48'57"E +). + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Cirrhilabrus rubrisquamis + +shares similar meristic characters to other members of this genus, in particular + +C. wakanda + +(the potential synonymy of both species is discussed below). However, the holotype is readily distinguished from related congeners in having the following combination of characters: lateral line with 21 or 22 pored scales (15 or 16 in the dorso-anterior series, six in the posterior peduncular series); gill rakers 16; caudal fin round with blue and yellow vermiculation in life; dorsal two-thirds of body with purple scales arranged in a chain-link pattern in life. + + + +Description. +Dorsal-fin rays XI,9; all soft rays branched except first; anal-fin rays III,9; all soft rays branched except first; last dorsal and anal-fin ray branched to base; pectoral-fin rays 15/15, upper two unbranched; pelvic-fin rays I,5; principal caudal-fin rays 7+6, uppermost and lowermost unbranched; upper procurrent caudal-fin rays 5, lower procurrent caudal-fin rays 5; lateral line interrupted, with dorso-anterior series of pored scales 16/15 and midlateral posterior peduncular series 6/6; first pored scale on posterior peduncular series often pitted; last pored scale on posterior peduncular series enlarged and overlapping hypural crease; scales above lateral line to origin of dorsal fin 2; scales below lateral line to origin of anal fin 6; median predorsal scales 5; median prepelvic scales 5; rows of scales on cheek 2; circumpeduncular scales 16; gill rakers 5 + 11 = 16; pseudobranchial filament count not made, owing to small size of specimen; vertebrae 9 + 16; epineurals 12. +Body moderately elongate and compressed, depth 3.5 in SL, width 2.2 in depth; head length (HL) 2.9 in SL; snout pointed, its length 3.6 in HL; orbit diameter 3.5 in HL; depth of caudal peduncle 2.1 in HL. Mouth small, terminal, and oblique, with maxilla almost reaching vertical at front edge of orbit; dentition typical of genus with three pairs of canine teeth present anteriorly at side of upper jaw, first forward-projecting, next two strongly recurved and outcurved, third longest; an irregular row of very small conical teeth medial to upper canines; lower jaw with a single stout pair of canines anteriorly which protrude obliquely outward and are slightly lateral to medial pair of upper jaw; no teeth on roof of mouth. +Posterior margin of preopercle with 29/27 very fine serrations; margins of posterior and ventral edges of preopercle free to about level of middle pupil. Anterior nostril in short membranous tube, located nearer to orbit than snout tip; posterior nostril larger, roughly ovoid to rectangular, located just medial and anterior to upper edge of eye. Scales cycloid; head scaled except snout and interorbital space; six large scales on opercle; a broad naked zone on membranous edge of preopercle; a row of large, elongate, pointed scales along base of dorsal fin, one per element, scales progressively shorter posteriorly on soft portion of fin; anal fin with a similar basal row of scales; last pored scale of lateral line (posterior to hypural plate) enlarged and pointed; one scale above and below last pored scale also enlarged; pectoral fins naked except for a few small scales at extreme base; a single large scale at base of each pelvic fin, about three-fourths length of pelvic spine. +Origin of dorsal fin above second or third lateral-line scale, predorsal length 2.7 in SL; first 1-5 dorsal-fin spines progressively longer, sixth to tenth subequal, eleventh longest, 2.3 in HL; interspinous membranes of dorsal fin in males extend beyond dorsal-fin spines, with each membrane extending in a pointed cirri beyond spine; eighth dorsal-fin soft ray longest, 2.0 in HL, remaining rays progressively shorter; origin of anal fin below base of tenth dorsal-fin spine; third anal-fin spine longest, 2.4 in HL; interspinous membranes of anal fin extended as on dorsal fin; anal-fin soft rays relatively uniform in length, eighth longest, 1.9 in HL; dorsal and anal-fin rays just reaching caudal-fin base; caudal fin rounded; pectoral fins short, reaching vertical between bases of fourth or fifth dorsal-fin spines, longest ray 1.8 in HL; origin of pelvic fins below lower base of pectoral fins; pelvic fins short, not reaching past anal fin origin, longest ray 1.8 in HL. + + +Coloration of holotype in life. + +Based on color photograph of holotype when fresh (Fig. +1 +): head yellow, brownish posteriorly; lower part of head whitish to pale pink; preopercle prominently purple on outer edge; iris yellow; body orangey pink, fading to whitish pink ventrally; body with a network of dark purple scales arranged in a chain link pattern from just after dorsal fin origin to edge of caudal peduncle, absent from lower third of body; dorsal fin hyaline, yellow on distal half; posterior dorsal fin yellowish hyaline with metallic blue spots; caudal fin bluish hyaline with yellow and blue vermiculation, often broken in spots; anal fin similar to dorsal fin; pelvic fins hyaline; pectoral fin base with a purple band; pectoral fins pinkish hyaline. + + + +Figure 1. + +Cirrhilabrus rubrisquamis + +, ROM 35932, 40.6 mm SL, juvenile holotype, Isla Fouquet, Peros Banhos Atoll, Chagos Archipelago. Photograph by AR Emery and R Winterbottom. + + + + +Coloration of holotype in alcohol. +Uniformly pale tan, median and paired fins translucent hyaline. No evidence of purple scale markings, likely due to immaturity and/or loss of coloration over time. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DB/5D/37DB5DCACFA95C17A1D2DAF175DB9CB4.xml b/data/37/DB/5D/37DB5DCACFA95C17A1D2DAF175DB9CB4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3756a7b631e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DB/5D/37DB5DCACFA95C17A1D2DAF175DB9CB4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +New combinations in Odontostemma (Caryophyllaceae) + + + +Author + +Rabeler, Richard K. +University of Michigan Herbarium - EEB, 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 - 2228, USA +rabeler@umich.edu + + + +Author + +Wagner, Warren L. + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2016 + +2016-06-02 + + +63 + + +77 +97 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.63.8181 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.63.8181 +1314-2003-63-77 +5844FFA9FFD4FF818A03FB22FFAE354C +899025 + + + + +Odontostemma melanandrum (Maxim.) Rabeler & W.L. Wagner +comb. nov. + + + + +Cerastium melanandrum +Maxim., Bull. Acad. Imp. Sci. +Saint-Petersbourg +, +Ser +. 3, 26: 429. 1880; +Arenaria melanandra +(Maxim.) Mattf. ex Hand.-Mazz., Symb. Sin. 7: 202. 1929. + + + + +Type +. + + + +China +: +Kansu +, 1873, Przewalski s.n. (LE?) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DB/8D/37DB8DEF306556A5A35FAA6BDCFBB7C1.xml b/data/37/DB/8D/37DB8DEF306556A5A35FAA6BDCFBB7C1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..59e5f6d3547 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DB/8D/37DB8DEF306556A5A35FAA6BDCFBB7C1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1088 @@ + + + +The genus Amegilla (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Anthophorini) in Australia: a revision of the subgenus Asaropoda + + + +Author + +Leijs, Remko + + + +Author + +Dorey, James + + + +Author + +Hogendoorn, Katja + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +908 + + +45 +122 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.908.47375 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.908.47375 +1313-2970-908-45 +ADB4118F51404AD199C05B903E992669 +29E7E47A230D57838B9369554612485E + + + + +Subgenus Asaropoda Cockerell, 1926 + + + + +Asaropoda +Cockerell, 1926: 216. + + + +Type. + + +Saropoda bombiformis + +Smith, 1854 (original designation). + + + +Diagnosis. + +The diagnosis for this subgenus as given by +Brooks (1988) +was largely based on the type species of the subgenus, + +A. bombiformis + +, but is revised to include species that he did not examine at the time, as well as the new species discovered here. The inclusion of these species extends the morphological variety in this subgenus. + + +In the following text, the main subgeneric diagnostic characters are in bold: +body length 12-24 mm; forewing length 8-18 mm; hairs absent in third submarginal cell and second medial cell +; hairs absent in first medial cell with the exception of + +A. albiclypeata + +and + +A. youngi + +which have a few short hairs, and + +A. nitidiventris + +which has more than ten hairs; hairs absent in the second submarginal cell with the exception of + +A. albiceps + +, + +A. aurantia + +, + +A. frogatti + +, and + +A. rhodoscymna + +which have less than ten hairs, and + +A. crenata + +, + +A. preissi + +, and + +A. albiclypeata + +which have 10-20 hairs; the pubescence of the majority of the species is orange, brown or grey, occasionally with black hairs anteriorly on T2 or following segments; however, there are two species groups with an aberrant pattern colouration of pubescence: the + +houstoni + +-group ( + +A. houstoni + +, + +A. epaphrodita + +, + +A. xylocopoides + +), which has an orange to yellow mesosomal pubescence, and predominantly black metasomal pubescence, and the + +youngi + +-group ( + +A. nitidiventris + +and + +A. youngi + +), which has brown mesosomal and black metasomal pubescence, with white to orange hairbands on the posterior margins. Colour dimorphism between the sexes is weak, apart from in + +A. dawsoni + +, where females have white to grey, and males brown mesosomal pubescence; maxiliary palpus with five segments; +apical margins of male metasomal sterna modified, with emarginations that vary in size and depth and are diagnostic at the species level +; S4 (and occasionally S3) bent medially; +the shape and size of the thick brush of stiff setae on S4 of males is diagnostic at the species level +; posterior margins of S5 and S6 emarginate medially of which its width, depth, size and shape is diagnostic at the species level; S6 medially with one or two patches of hair; S7 usually with slender neck, with the exception of + +A. scoparia + +and + +A. frogatti + +where the neck is robust; S7 apical margin of head among species variable in shape; S8 apically narrowed and usually emarginate; apex of gonocoxite of male bearing one or two gonostyli of which number, size and shape are diagnostic at the species level; gonostyli with setae of variable length and densities; penis valves laterally rounded, drawn into rounded lobes, or with angular lobes; +S6 of females medially with raised area which varies +from inconspicuous roughened, broadly parabolic with well-defined rim, slender spine, to almost a pygidium like structure. + + +We now recognise 21 species in +Amegilla (Asaropoda) +. + + + + +Identification key to the Australian subgenera of + +Amegilla + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1Forewing: hairs absent in 3rd submarginal cell and 2nd medial cell, usually also in 2nd submarginal cell and 1st medial cell; S4 in males with a rounded, triangular or elongated brush of dense usually forward-directed bristles, S6 of females medially with raised area which varies among species from inconspicuously roughened, broadly parabolic with well-defined rim and slender spine, to almost a pygidium like structure + +subgenus +Asaropoda + +
-Forewing: hairs present in in 3rd submarginal cell, 2nd medial cell and most other cells; S4 in males and S6 in females not modified as described above +2 +
2Female: Integument of paraclypeal areas black; fore and mid femora and tibiae with iridescent blue-green hairs, male: S6 gently convex; apex S7 broadly triangular + +subgenus +Notomegilla + +
-Female: Integument of paraclypeal areas partly yellow, white or ivory; hair on fore and mid legs never iridescent, male: S6 with broad depressions either side of midline; apex S7 ovate + +subgenus +Zonamegilla + +
+ + + + +Identification key to the 21 species of +Amegilla (Asaropoda) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1 +Female: Body size large (> 19 mm), pubescence on head and mesosoma white, metasomal integument predominantly dark red (Fig. +10J, K +). Male: S4 apicomedially with two small adjacent patches of anteriorly directed, black bristles (Fig. +10C +), S5 with parabolically shaped emargination (Fig. +10C +) + + +A. dawsoni + +
-Not with above combination of characters (20 spp.) +2 +
2Metasomal pubescence predominantly black, some species with light coloured posterior bands of white pubescence on terminal terga (5 spp.) +3 +
-Metasomal pubescence predominantly orange, brown or grey, with or without an anterior band of black pubescence on T2 (15 spp.) +7 +
3 +Light coloured posterior bands present on all terga (Figs +15 +, +17 +, +22 +) (3 spp.) + +4 +
- +Light coloured posterior bands lacking, or only on last 1-3 terminal terga (Figs +21 +, +11 +) (2 spp.) + +6 +
4 +Female: T1 with thin, faint white posterior band, T2-4 with well-developed white posterior hair bands (Fig. +15 +). Male unknown + + +A. houstoni + +
-All terga with well-developed posterior hair bands. Hair bands on T1-2 orange (2 spp.) +5 +
5 +Female: clypeus ivory with two large black marks, which are sometimes combined at the top, scape black. Male: S4 with two adjacent small patches of downward-directed bristles on apicomedial margin and two large comma-shaped patches of bristles on S5 (Fig. +17C +) + + + +A. nitidiventris + +sp. nov + +. +
- +Female: clypeus with two small brown marks, scape with pale yellow mark (Fig. +22C +). Male unknown + + + +A. youngi + +sp. nov. + +
6 +Metasomal pubescence entirely black (Fig. +21B, K +) + + + +A. xylocopoides + +sp. nov. + +
- +T4-5 (female), T5-6 (male) with predominantly white hairs (Fig. +11B, K +) + + +A. epaphrodita + +
7Male +8 +
-Female +21 +
8 +Both S3 and S4 medially with round patch of bristles, the patch on S3 smaller than on S4 (Figs +5C +, +9C +, +19C +) (3 spp.) + +9 +
- +Only S4 with median patch of bristles of varying size and shape (Figs +7C +, +8C +, +20C +) (12 spp.) + +11 +
9 +S2-4 without apicomedial emarginations; S5 apicomedial area deeply emarginated, emargination deeper than wide and almost parallel to body axis (Figs +9C +, +19C +) (2 spp.) + +10 +
- +S2-4 with distinct apicomedial emarginations (Fig. +5C +); apicomedial emargination on S5 wider than deep, not parallel to body axis + + + +A. aurantia + +sp. nov. + +
10 +Apicomedial emargination on S5 parallel-sided, slightly deeper than wide (Fig. +19C +) + + +A. rhodoscymna + +
- +Apicomedial emargination on S5 more than twice as deep as wide (Fig. +9C +) + + + +A. crenata + +sp. nov. + +
11 +S4 shape of patch of bristles round (Figs +8C +, +13C +, +16C +) (3 spp.) + +12 +
- +S4 shape of patch of bristles triangular or bell-shaped (Figs +2C +, +4C +, +7C +, +14C +) (4 spp.) + +14 +
- +S4 shape of patch of bristles elongated (Figs +3C +, +18C +, +20C +) (5 spp.) + +17 +
12 +S4 patch of bristles relatively large, circa 1/7 of width of sternum (Figs +13C +, +16C +), pubescence around apicomedial area of S5 strongly branched (2 spp.) + +13 +
- +S4 patch of bristles small, less than 1/10 of width of sternum (Fig. +8C +), pubescence around apicomedial area of S5 almost simple, only occasionally with side branches + + +A. calva + +
13 +Face marks pale yellow, scape brown (Fig. +16D +), inner gonostylus very small (Fig. +16G, H +) + + + +A. incognita + +sp. nov. + +
- +Face marks ivory, underside of scape with ivory mark (Fig. +13D +), inner gonostylus well developed, almost as long as outer gonostylus, club-shaped (Fig. +13G, H +). + + +A. frogatti + +
14 +S4 patch of bristles small, circa 1/5 of width of sternum (Fig. +7C +), S5 apicomedial area with large triangular emargination (Fig. +7C +), the area with sparse to openly placed branched hairs, lateral corners of S5 rounded + + +A. bombiformis + +
- +S4 patch of bristles larger, S5 apicomedial emargination shallow (Figs +2C +, +4C +, +14C +), densely covered in branched hairs, lateral corners of S5 with pointed lobe (3 spp.) + +15 +
15 +S4 patch of bristles large, circa 1/3 of width of sternum, bristles brown (Fig. +4C +) + + +A. albigenella + +
-S4 patch of bristles less than 1/3 of width of sternum, bristles black (2 spp.) +16 +
16 +S4 patch of bristles triangular (Fig. +2C +), legs on outer surface with orange pubescence. + + +A. albiceps + +
- +S4 patch of bristles bell-shaped (Fig. +14C +), legs on outer surface with white pubescence + + + +A. griseocincta + +sp. nov. + +
17 +S4 patch of black bristles broad and circa 1/2-2/3 of sternum width (Fig. +20C +), S6 apicomedial area with conspicuous fimbria of black and orange fringed hairs, T2 anteriorly with area of black hairs as wide as marginal zone + + + +A. scoparia + +sp. nov. + +
-S4 patch of pale bristles narrow, circa 1/3 of width of sternum, S6 apicomedial area without conspicuous fimbria of black and orange-fringed hairs, T2 anteriorly with area of black hairs much narrower than marginal zone, or without black hairs (4 spp.) +18 +
18 +Face marks ivory/white, elongated patch of bristles on S4 black (Fig. +3C +) + + + +A. albiclypeata + +sp. nov. + +
-Face marks pale to bright yellow, patch of bristles on S4 dark or light brown (3 spp.) +19 +
19 +T2 anteriorly without dark hairs, S5 apicomedial emargination circa 6 +x +as wide as deep, (Fig. +6C +) + + + +A. batleyi + +sp. nov. + +
- +T2 anteriorly with entire narrow band of dark hairs, S5 apicomedial emargination less than 4 +x +as wide as deep + +20 +
20 +S6 marginal zone smooth without punctures or hairs, some short hairs medially (Fig. +18C +) + + +A. preissi + +
- +S6 marginal area, smooth with open punctures and hairs, medially with patch of stiff dark hairs (Fig. +12C +) + + +A. flava + +
21Hind leg: tibial scopa on outer surface with white or grey-white hairs (5 spp.) +22 +
-Hind leg: tibial scopa on outer surface with pale yellow, ochre or orange hairs (8 spp.) +26 +
22Paraclypeal area with pale yellow mark (3 spp.) +23 +
-Paraclypeal area black (3 spp.) +25 +
23 +Paraclypeal marks small (Fig. +6M +), anterior part of T2 without black hairs + + + +A. batleyi + +sp. nov. + +
- +Paraclypeal marks large (Figs +13M +, +14M +), anterior part of T2 with distinct band of black contiguous hairs + +24 +
24Scutum and T1 pubescence light brown, T2 and T3 anteriorly with black hairs + + +A. griseocincta + +sp. nov. + +
-Scutum and T1 pubescence appears grey, hairs light ochre intermixed with longer black hairs, only T2 with black hairs anteriorly + +A. frogatti + +
25 +Supraclypeal area black, clypeus with yellow inverted T shaped mark (Fig. +18M +), anterior part of T2 with narrow band of black hair, terga with greyish pubescence, S6 with smooth and clearly defined parabolic expression (Fig. +18L +) + + +A. preissi + +
- +Supraclypeal area with yellow or pale yellow mark, clypeus with two vertical brown marks (Fig. +8M +), T2 without black hairs anteriorly, surface of S6 roughend, expression on S6 not clearly defined (Fig. +8L +) + + +A. calva + +
26Paraclypeal area with light coloured mark (3 spp.) +27 +
-Paraclypeal area without light coloured mark (6 spp.) +29 +
27T2 anteriorly with narrow band of black hairs across whole width, sterna with dark hairs + +A. albiceps + +
-Dark hairs on T2 restricted to antero-lateral corners or lacking, sterna on disk with orange hairs (2 spp.) +28 +
28 +Integument of T3 and following segments anteriorly dark brown, clypeus with two well defined vertical dark orange marks (Fig. +4M +), S6 with small angular raised median ridge (Fig. +4L +). + + +A. albigenella + +
- +Integument of T3 and following segments anteriorly orange, marks on clypeus undefined and small (Fig. +5M +), S6 with narrow raised area and short transverse posterior ridge (Fig. +5L +) + + + +A. aurantia + +sp. nov. + +
29T2 anteriorly with black hairs (2 spp.) +30 +
-Pubescence on T2 uniformly coloured (4 spp.) +31 +
30 +Scape orange, T2 anterior with wide area of black hairs, clypeus marks undefined (Fig. +7M +), the orange pubescence on terga has an iridescent shine + + +A. bombiformis + +
- +Scape black, apically brown, T2 anteriorly with narrow area of erect black hairs, clypeus with brown horseshoe-like mark (Fig. +20M +), sometimes just with two dark patches, pubescence on terga not with iridescent shine + + + +A. scoparia + +sp. nov. + +
31 +Clypeus colouration yellow, orange pubescence on terga with iridescent shine, S6 projection broadly parabolic, well defined (Figs +9L +, +19L +) (2 spp.). + +32 +
- +Clypeus colouration pale yellow or ivory, pubescence on terga without iridescent shine, S6 projection rounded, not well defined (Figs +3L +, +12L +) (2 spp.) + +33 +
32 +Clypeus marked with inverted yellow T (Fig. +19M +), scape and antennae brown + + +A. rhodoscymna + +
- +Clypeus yellow, with two faint brown patches (Fig. +9M +), scape orange-brown, flagellum brown below, black above + + + +A. crenata + +n.sp. + +
33 +Clypeus with pale yellow inverted T-shape, supraclypeal area black (Fig. +12M +). Hind leg: tibial scopa on outer surface with pale yellow or ochre coloured hairs (Fig. +12K +). [Note: this couplet may also lead to + +A. + +( +A +) + +scymna + +, but shape of pale yellow clypeus colouration similar to Fig. +3M +] + + +A. flava + +
- +Clypeus colouration ivory, supraclypeal area black with narrow ivory line at base (Fig. +3M +). Hind leg: tibial scopa on outer surface with orange coloured hairs (Fig. +3K +) + + + +A. albiclypeata + +sp. nov. + +
+ + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DB/EF/37DBEFF688F6DBE90B9E9C30E898E8CB.xml b/data/37/DB/EF/37DBEFF688F6DBE90B9E9C30E898E8CB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..edaf7802063 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DB/EF/37DBEFF688F6DBE90B9E9C30E898E8CB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ + + + +Contribution to the knowledge of Galumnoidea (Acari, Oribatida) of Cuba + + + +Author + +Ermilov, Sergey G. + + + +Author + +Tolstikov, Andrei V. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +537 + + +65 +78 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.537.6644 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.537.6644 +1313-2970-537-65 +B0A9E1EAEFDB45099E192B13183DBBF2 +B0A9E1EAEFDB45099E192B13183DBBF2 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Sarcoptiformes Galumnidae + + + +Pergalumna cubaensis +sp. n. +Figs 1-2, 3-4, 5-11 + + + +Diagnosis. + +Body size: 962-1029 +x +763-780. Prodorsum, epimeral region and antero-lateral parts of pteromorphs heavily granulated. Notogaster, anogenital region, pteromorphs and genital and anal plates striate. Rostral, lamellar, interlamellar and bothridial setae setiform, slightly barbed. Anterior notogastral margin well-developed. Three pairs of porose areas (Aa, A2, A3) rounded. Median pore and postanal porose area absent. + + + +Description. +Measurements. Body length: 1012 (holotype: female), 962, 1029 (two paratypes: female and male); notogaster width: 763 (holotype), 763, 780 (two paratypes). +Integument. Body color black-brownish. Prodorsum, epimeral region and antero-lateral parts of pteromorphs heavily granulated; granules rounded or slightly elongated, their diameter or length up to 6. Notogaster, anogenital region, pteromorphs and genital and anal plates striate. +Prodorsum. Rostrum broadly rounded. Lamellar (L) and sublamellar (S) lines distinct, parallel, curving backwards. Rostral (ro, 77-86) and lamellar (le, 53-65) setae thin, slightly barbed, directed antero-medially. Interlamellar setae (in, 86-90) setae setiform, indistinctly barbed, directed medially. Bothridial setae (bs, 110-123) setiform, slightly barbed, directed postero-laterad. Exobothridial setae and their alveoli absent. Porose areas Ad absent. +Notogaster. Anterior notogastral margin well developed. Dorsophragmata (D) of medium size, elongated longitudinally. Notogastral setae represented by ten pairs of alveoli. Three pairs of porose areas (Aa, A2, A3) rounded, similar in diameter (20-24), with clear borders. Areas Aa located between setal alveoli la and lm, equal distanced from them. Median pore absent in male and females. All lyrifissures (ia, im, ip, ih, ips) distinct, im and opisthonotal gland openings (gla) located antero-laterally to A2. + +Gnathosoma. Morphology of subcapitulum, palps and chelicerae typical for +Pergalumna +( +Engelbrecht 1972 +; +Ermilov and Anichkin 2011 +; +Ermilov et al. 2014 +a). Subcapitulum size: 200-205 +x +196-200. Subcapitular setae setiform, slightly barbed, a (36-41) longer than m (28-32) and h (24-28); a thickest, h thinnest. Two pairs of adoral setae (or1, or2, 24-28) setiform, barbed. Palp length: 176. Axillary sacculi (sac) distinct. Chelicera length: 303. Cheliceral setae setiform, barbed, cha (106) longer than chb (61). + + +Epimeral and lateral podosomal regions. Anterior tectum of epimere I smooth. Setal formula: 1 +-0-2- +3. Setae thin, slightly barbed, 1b, 3b, 3c and 4c (41-49) longer than 4a and 4b (24-28) Pedotecta II trapezoid in ventral view. Discidia sharply triangular. Circumpedal carinae (cp) reaching insertions of 3b. + +Anogenital region. Six pairs of genital (g1, g2, 36-45; g3-g6, 20-28), one pair of aggenital (ag, 20-28), two pairs of anal (an1, an2, 20-28) and three pairs of adanal (ad1-ad3, 20-28) setae thin, indistinctly barbed. Genital plates with two genital setae on anterior edge. Adanal lyrifissures (iad) located diagonally to anal plates. Distance ad1-ad2 shorter than ad2-ad3. Setae ad3 inserted laterally to iad. Postanal porose area absent. + +Legs. Morphology of leg segments, setae and solenidia typical for +Pergalumna +(see +Engelbrecht 1972 +; +Ermilov and Anichkin 2011 +; +Ermilov et al. 2014 +a). Tridactylous, claws smooth. Formulas of leg setation and solenidia: I (1 +-4-3-4- +20) [1 +-2- +2], II (1 +-4-3-4- +15) [1 +-1- +2], III (1 +-2-1-3- +15) [1 +-1- +0], IV (1 +-2-2-3- +12) [0 +-1- +0]; homology of setae and solenidia indicated in Table 1. Solenidion +φ +of tibiae IV inserted dorsally at about 2/3 length of segment. + + + +Figures 1-2. +Pergalumna cubaensis +sp. n., adult: 1 dorsal view (striae and granules are shown partially) 2 anterior part of body, lateral view (gnathosoma and leg I not illustrated, striae and granules are shown partially). Scale bar 200 +µm +. + + + + +Figures 3-4. +Pergalumna cubaensis +sp. n., adult: 3 ventral view (gnathosoma and legs not illustrated, striae and granules are shown partially) 4 posterior view. Scale bar 200 +µm +. + + + + +Figures 5-11. +Pergalumna cubaensis +sp. n., adult: 5 rostrum, frontal view (granules are shown partially) 6 interlamellar seta and part of sejugal region 7 bothridial seta 8 subcapitulum (in dissected specimen), ventral view 9 right genital plate and part of epimeral and aggenital regions (granules are shown partially) 10 right anal plate and part of adanal region 11 tibia of leg IV, left, antiaxial view. Scale bars 100 +µm +(5, 6, 8-11), 50 +µm +(7). + + + + +Table 1. Leg setation and solenidia of adult +Pergalumna cubaensis +sp. n. (same data for +Allogalumna cubana +Balogh & Mahunka, 1979). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
LegTrFeGeTiTa
vdlbvlvlv12fttcitpuaspvvpll12
vdlbvlvlvfttcitpuaspv12
vdevllvfttcitpuaspv
vdevdllvfttcpuaspv
+ + + +Material examined. +Locality Cuba 1: holotype (female) and two paratypes (female and male). + + +Type deposition. + +The holotype is deposited in the collection of the Senckenberg Museum, +Goerlitz +, Germany; two paratypes are in the collection of the Tyumen State University Museum of Zoology, Tyumen, Russia. + + + +Etymology. +The specific name cubaensis refers to the country of origin, Cuba. + + +Remarks. + +Pergalumna cubaensis +sp. n. is morphologically most similar to +Pergalumna decorata +Balogh & Mahunka, 1977 from the Neotropical region (see +Balogh and Mahunka 1977 +) in having a rounded rostrum, a striate notogaster, an anterior margin of notogaster, three pairs of rounded porose areas on the notogaster, and setiform bothridial setae. However, the new species differs from the latter by the larger body size (962-1029 +x +763-780 vs. 637-653 +x +469-494 in +Pergalumna decorata +), a heavily granulated prodorsum (vs. striate in +Pergalumna decorata +), and the interlamellar setae being of medium size (vs. minute in +Pergalumna decorata +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DC/0B/37DC0BEDA66F54A0B493415499ACEEC2.xml b/data/37/DC/0B/37DC0BEDA66F54A0B493415499ACEEC2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d561891835d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DC/0B/37DC0BEDA66F54A0B493415499ACEEC2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,296 @@ + + + +Description of six new large species of Argentinomyia Lynch-Arribalzaga, 1891 and redescription of Talahua fervida (Fluke, 1945) (Diptera, Syrphidae, Syrphinae) + + + +Author + +Montoya, Augusto L. +Grupo de Entomologia, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 67 # 53 - 108, Medellin, Colombia +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3307-034X +guto.spider@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Wolff, Marta +Grupo de Entomologia, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 67 # 53 - 108, Medellin, Colombia +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-7083 + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +929 + + +19 +51 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.929.37666 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.929.37666 +1313-2970-929-19 +33EAB9576453425ABE3DD382B8F155D0 +076E5368430653A4AD418807020D26D7 + + + + +Argentinomyia puntarena Montoya +sp. nov. +Figures 6 +, 7 +, 16 + + + +Differential diagnosis. + +Antenna orange ventrally, oval, longer than wide. Costal cell hyaline, bare basally. Alula bare medially. Pro- and mesofemur yellow. Metafemur orange on basal 1/5 and apical 3/5. Probasitarsomere, meso- and metabasitarsomere I-II yellow. Second tergum with a broad macula reaching apical 1/3. Third tergum with a broad macula, short in fourth. Sternite fourth to fifth black pilose. + +Argentinomyia puntarena + +sp. nov. is similar in appearance to + +Argentinomyia talamanca + +sp. nov., but in + +A. talamanca + +sp. nov. the antenna is brown; alula and costal cell are extensively microtrichose; femur is extensively brown; the second tergum has a pair of small maculae on basal 1/5 (see 'diagnostic +features' +under each species or key). + + + +Type locality. + +Costa Rica, department of Puntarenas, Coto Brus municipality, Sendero entre +Estacion +Tres Colinas y Laguna Seca, +9°1.279'N +, 82°, 50.337'E, 2100-2550 m a.s.l. + + + +Description. + +Male. Head +(Fig. +6A, C +). Black, covered with white pollinosity, ocellar triangle, and a large triangular macula on the front, brown pilose, pile on front black, on gena and face white pilose, on ocellar triangle black pilose, on the occiput white except for the dorsal pile, which are black, frontal triangle golden metallic. Antennae brown, orange-red ventrally, oval, longer than wide pedicel and the lower basal corner of basoflagellomere, ratio 1.0:1.1:2.9, arista orange, dark brown toward the tip. +Thorax +(Fig. +6C +). Black, scutum shining, with iridescent to opaque reflections, with two median brownish pollinose vittae on anterior half. +Wing +(Fig. +6C +). Slightly smoky, the stigma brownish, membrane microtrichose, except for extensive bare areas on basal half (cells, sc, r1, dm and bm); costal cell hyaline, bare on basal 1/2; marginal maculae restricted to surrounding areas of veins R1, R4+5 and M1 apically; tegula black pilose, basicosta yellow pilose, alula bare medially, calypter whitish, border whitish, fringe yellow, plumula yellow, halter yellow, knob white. +Legs +(Fig. +6C +). Yellow, pro- and mesofemur yellow; metafemur brown, except orange on basal 1/5 and apical 1/5; pro and mesotibia orange, metatibia extensively brown, only orange brownish on basal 2/3; probasitarsomere, meso- and metabasitarsomere I-II yellow, the pile yellow, black on the metatibia and above on the tarsi. +Abdomen +(Fig. +6B +). Elongate, black, the first tergum shining black, orange laterally, the second tergum with a broad macula reaching apical 1/3 laterally; third tergum with a broad triangular macula, which is short in the fourth tergum; fourth and fifth sterna black pilose. Pile orange on the sides basally, as well as in the maculae, black down the middle and on the terga apex. Male genitalia as Fig. +7 +. + + +Female. +(Fig. +6D-F +). Similar to male except for normal sexual dimorphism. Frons with pollinose transversal maculae below. Abdominal maculae are comparatively shorter than in the male and indistinguishable in the fourth tergum. + + +Length +( +N += 4). Body 12.4-12.6 mm; wing 11.3-11.5 mm. + + + +Etymology. + +The specific epithet + +puntarena + +is a noun in apposition and refers to the province where the type series was collected. + + + +Distribution. + + +Argentinomyia puntarena + +sp. nov. ( +N += 5) is distributed through the west slope of the +Talamanca +Cordillera in Costa Rica (Puntarenas, San +Jose +) at an elevation between 1000 to 2550 m. a.s.l., in the province of +Puntarena-Chiriqui +(Fig. +16 +). + +Argentinomyia puntarena + +sp. nov. occurs in sympatry with + +A. talamanca + +sp. nov. in the +Puntarena-Chiriqui +province. + + + +Type material. + + + +Holotype +. + +COSTA RICA +♂ +, +Puntarenas +, +Coto Brus +, + +Sendero entre +Estacion +Tres Colinas y Laguna Seca + +. "Original label: "Costa Rica: Puntarenas, Coto Brus, Sendero entre / +Estacion +Tres Colinas y Laguna Seca / +9°1.279'N +, +82°50.337'E +(L.S. 344300_565800), +2100-2550 +m a.s.l. / +24.vii.2000 +, +Manual, A. Picado +Leg., #59166 ( +INBio 000311623 +)". "HOLOTYPE / + +Argentinomyia huitepecensis + +/ Montoya 2020" [red, handwritten except the first line]". The holotype is in good condition and deposited at the INBio museum, in Costa Rica. "identified as + +Argentinomyia + +sp. 16 by Thompson". + +Paratypes. +COSTA RICA • 1 ♂, Puntarenas, Monteverde, San Luis, +10°16.644'N +, +84°47.271'E +(L.S. 250850_449250), 1000-1350 m a.s.l., 7.iv.1995, Fuentes #4801 (INBio CRI002202643); 1♀, San +Jose +, San Gerardo de Dota, Sevegre Lodge near Rio Sevegre, +9°33.000'N +, +83°48.000'E +(L.S. 387400_482700), 2200 m a.s.l., 18-21.viii.1995, A.L. Norrbom (USNM ENT 00036925); 1♀, same data as for preceding, 2000-2500 m a.s.l., 22.ii.1992, +Tachinidae +and +Syrphidae +course (INBio CRI000406820); 1♀, Farm Zacatales, 2100 m a.s.l., 8-10.viii.1995, M.A. Zumbado, #6280 (INBio CRI002427774). + + + +Comments. + + +Argentinomyia puntarena + +sp. nov. and + +Argentinomyia talamanca + +sp. nov. can be confused or mistakenly identified as + +Xanthandrus mexicanus + +Curran, 1930 due to the superficial similarity of these species. However, + +X. mexicanus + +can be distinguished by the presence of the antennal cavity broadly confluent (synapomorphy for + +Xanthandrus + +); the central portion of epistoma moderately prominent; the face entirely white pollinose and pilose; the pleura black with white pollinosity; metaepisternum with some fine subappressed long pile (distinctive of + +Xanthandrus + +); the abdomen oval, wide and flat, opaque, with yellow-orange triangular maculae on second to the fourth tergum, and the male genitalia with surstylus elongated, apically widened ( +Borges and Pamplona 2003 +:162, figs 33-37). + + + +Figure 6. + +Argentinomyia puntarena + +sp. nov., male (InBio CRI000311623): +A +head, frontal, male +B +dorsal view +C +lateral view. Female (InBio CRI002427774): +D +head, frontal view +E +dorsal view +F +lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm. + + + + +Figure 7. + +Argentinomyia puntarena + +sp. nov., male genitalia: +A +whole genitalia including epandrium, cercus, and surstylus, lateral view +B +epandrium, dorsal view +C +hypandrium, ventral view. Scale bar: 0.05 mm. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DC/9F/37DC9FF268B743EDB6D124CB0FD40526.xml b/data/37/DC/9F/37DC9FF268B743EDB6D124CB0FD40526.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..76d5bfbf4ec --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DC/9F/37DC9FF268B743EDB6D124CB0FD40526.xml @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Braconidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Shaw, Mark R. + + + +Author + +Godfray, H. Charles J. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8151 +8151 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8151 +1314-2828-4-8151 + + + + +Pentapleura angustula (Haliday, 1838) + + + + +Alysia angustula +Haliday, 1838 + + +laevipleuris +(Tobias, 1962, +Aspilota +) + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DC/B4/37DCB416DD14EB0A3AC4D7E55D703164.xml b/data/37/DC/B4/37DCB416DD14EB0A3AC4D7E55D703164.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e644b420e59 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DC/B4/37DCB416DD14EB0A3AC4D7E55D703164.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +Les Pheidole du groupe megacephala (Formicidae). + + + +Author + +Emery, C. + +text + + +Revue de Zoologie Africaine + + +1915 + +4 + + +223 +250 + + + + +http://atbi.biosci.ohio-state.edu/HymOnline/reference-full.html?id=3875 + +journal article +3875 + + + + +Var. +koshewnikovi +Ruzsky. + + + + +Je possede un cotype que je tiens de l'auteur. Le [[ soldier ]] differe des formes precedentes par la tete notablement plus courte (a peu pres comme +pallidula pallidula +) et la, sculpture plus faible; les stries du devant du front sont remarquablement fines et serrees. Epines de l'epinotum relativement longues. Selon Ruzsky, le scape est moins epaissi que chez sa +pallidula +(= var. +orientalis +), la tete est de forme differente, avec les cotes plus arrondis et l'echancrure de l'occiput plus profonde. Je n'ai trouve aucune difference dans le scape; quant a la forme de la tete, les differences m'ont paru insignifiantes (1). L [[ worker ]] ne differe pas de l' [[ worker ]] de la subsp, +arenarum +typique. + + +M. Ruzsky considere cette Fourmi comme sous-espece: vu la variabilite de la forme de la tete du [[ soldier ]] (voir la note a la var. +orientalis +, je ne saurais en faire qu'une variete. + +Cette Fourmi a ete decrite sur des exemplaires provenant du Gouvernement de Semirjetchensk (au sud du lac Balchasch); elle a aussi ete capturee plus au sud (Bekljar-bek, a 42 o de latitude) par M. le Prof Sahlberg. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DC/E6/37DCE606CDAD4C246D488515D982B01B.xml b/data/37/DC/E6/37DCE606CDAD4C246D488515D982B01B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..674d6da9578 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DC/E6/37DCE606CDAD4C246D488515D982B01B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +bousquety1@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-11-28 + + +245 + + +1 +1722 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 +1313-2970-245-1 +FFFF52503A0AFF882450FFB66D45FF8E +578462 + + + + +Pseudanophthalmus illinoisensis Barr and Peck, 1966 + + + + +Pseudanophthalmus illinoisensis +Barr and Peck, 1966: 520. Type locality: "Cave Spring Cave, Hardin Co[unty], Illinois" (original citation). Holotype (♂) in USNM [# 75259]. + + + +Distribution. +This species is known only from the type-locality cave (Barr 2004: 26). + + +Records. + +USA +: IL + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DD/02/37DD02D12FEC52BE8AB7DD22B15177FF.xml b/data/37/DD/02/37DD02D12FEC52BE8AB7DD22B15177FF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2069ea714f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DD/02/37DD02D12FEC52BE8AB7DD22B15177FF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Subtribe +Amorphosternina Cobos, 1974 + + + + +Amorphosternae +Cobos, 1974: 69 [stem: Amorphostern-]. Type genus: +Amorphosternus +Deyrolle, 1864. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DD/8F/37DD8FA7A93E510EBD0B0C4C2E4998C2.xml b/data/37/DD/8F/37DD8FA7A93E510EBD0B0C4C2E4998C2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8b8faffe609 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DD/8F/37DD8FA7A93E510EBD0B0C4C2E4998C2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,299 @@ + + + +Discovery of Cytospora species associated with canker disease of tree hosts from Mount Dongling of China + + + +Author + +Zhu, Haiyan + + + +Author + +Pan, Meng + + + +Author + +Bezerra, Jadson D. P. + + + +Author + +Tian, Chengming + + + +Author + +Fan, Xinlei + +text + + +MycoKeys + + +2020 + +62 + + +97 +121 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.62.47854 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.62.47854 +1314-4049-62-97 +0CDEF6D5DE4451A181F8818FFC66ACD9 + + + + +Cytospora spiraeicola H.Y. Zhu & X.L. Fan +sp. nov. +Fig. 7 + + + +Etymology. + +Named after the host genus on which it was collected, + +Spiraea + +. + + + +Holotype. + +China, Beijing City, Mentougou District, Mount Dongling, Xiaolongmen Forestry Centre ( +115°28'28.52"E +, +39°55'49.42"N +), from branches of + +Spiraea salicifolia + +, 17 Aug 2017, H.Y. Zhu & X.L. Fan, holotype CF 2019803, ex-type living culture CFCC 53138. + + + +Description. + +Necrotrophic +on branches of + +Spiraea salicifolia + +and + +Tilia nobilis + +. +Sexual morph +: +Ascostromata +immersed in the bark, erumpent through the surface of bark, scattered, with 3-5 perithecia arranged regularly, 660-890 +µm +in diam. +Conceptacle +absent. +Ectostromatic disc +pale grey, usually surrounded by tightly crowded ostiolar necks, quadrangular, 240-350 +µm +in diam., with 5-8 ostioles arranged regularly per disc. +Ostioles +numerous, dark grey to black, at the same or above the level as the disc, concentrated, arranged regularly in a disc, 25-40 +µm +in diam. +Perithecia +dark grey to black, flask-shaped to spherical, arranged circularly, 210-250 +µm +in diam. +Paraphyses +lacking. +Asci +free, clavate to elongate, obovoid, 26-37 +x +7.5-9 (av. = 33 ++/- +2.5 +x +8.3 ++/- +0.9, n = 10) +μm +, 8-spored. +Ascospores +biseriate, elongate-allantoid, thin-walled, hyaline, slightly curved, aseptate, 8.5-12 +x +2.5-3.5 (av. = 10 ++/- +1 +x +3 ++/- +0.3, n = 30) +μm +. +Asexual morph +: not observed. + + + +Figure 7. + +Cytospora spiraeicola + +from + +Spiraea salicifolia + +(CF 2019803). +A, B +habit of ascomata on twig +C +transverse section of ascoma +D +longitudinal section through ascoma +E +asci and ascospores +F, G +ascus +H +ascospores +I +colonies on PDA at 3 days (left) and 30 days (right). Scale bars: 1 mm ( +A, B +); 500 +μm +( +C, D +); 10 +μm +( +E-H +). + + + + +Culture characteristics. + +Cultures +are white, growing up to 4 cm in diam. with irregular margin after 3 days, covering the 9 cm Petri dish after 6 days, becoming vinaceous buff to hazel after 7-10 days. In reverse, the cultures are the same as the upper colour after 3 days, becoming isabelline to umber after 7-10 days. +Colonies +are felty with a heterogeneous texture, lacking aerial mycelium. + + + +Habitat and distribution. + +Known from + +Spiraea salicifolia + +and + +Tilia nobilis + +in Mount Dongling, China. + + + +Additional material examined. + +China, Beijing City, Mentougou District, Mount Dongling, Xiaolongmen Forestry Centre ( +115°29'20.49"E +, +39°57'47.43"N +), from branches of + +Tilia nobilis + +, 17 Aug 2017, H.Y. Zhu & X.L. Fan, CF 2019804, living culture CFCC 53139. + + + +Notes. + + +Cytospora spiraeicola + +is associated with canker disease of + +Spiraea salicifolia + +and + +Tilia nobilis + +in China, with characteristics similar to + +Cytospora elaeagnicola + +and + +C. spiraeae + +in phylogram (Fig. +2 +). Morphologically, it differs from + +C. spiraeae + +by the smaller perithecia (210-250 vs. 270-400 +µm +in diam.) and longer ascospores (8.5-12 +x +2.5-3.5 vs. 7-8 +x +2-2.5 +µm +) ( +Zhu et al. 2018a +). Phylogenetically, + +C. spiraeicola + +(CFCC 53138) differs from + +C. elaeagnicola + +(CFCC 52882) by ITS (8/665), +rpb2 +(44/730), +tef1-α +(75/771) and +tub2 +(42/624) and + +C. spiraeae + +(CFCC 50049) by ITS (4/665), +rpb2 +(38/730), +tef1-α +(63/771) and +tub2 +(44/624) ( +Zhu et al. 2018a +, +Zhang et al. 2019 +). Therefore, we describe it as a novel species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DD/D0/37DDD0E5E04F8CE50B6C09BB70A2E8CB.xml b/data/37/DD/D0/37DDD0E5E04F8CE50B6C09BB70A2E8CB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cb1928e4d42 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DD/D0/37DDD0E5E04F8CE50B6C09BB70A2E8CB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + +Order Carnivora + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +532 +628 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Mustela eversmanii +subsp. +eversmanii +Lesson 1827 + + + + + + + +Mustela eversmanii +subsp. +eversmanii +Lesson 1827 + +, +Manuel de Mammalogie: 144 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +"trouvé...entre Orembourg et Bukkara," restricted by +Stroganov (1962:338) +to "bassein srednego techeniya r. Ileka, v raione vpadenya...r. Bol'shoi Khobdy" [ +Russia +, +Orenburg Obl. +, south of +Orenburg +, mouth of Bol'shaya Khobda River, a tributary of Ilek River]. + + + + + +Synonyms: + +Mustela eversmanii +subsp. +aureus +(Pocock 1936) + +; + +Mustela eversmanii +subsp. +heptapotamicus +(Stroganov 1960) + +; + +Mustela eversmanii +subsp. +nobilis +( +Stroganov 1958 +) + +; + +Mustela eversmanii +subsp. +pallidus +( +Stroganov 1958 +) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DD/D7/37DDD76DAD8D01C044B43F7372DBEEF3.xml b/data/37/DD/D7/37DDD76DAD8D01C044B43F7372DBEEF3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2e8af587358 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DD/D7/37DDD76DAD8D01C044B43F7372DBEEF3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Utricularia gibba +, +spec. nov. + + + +4. Utricularia nectario gibboso. + +Utricularia florum nectario gibboso, scapo nunc unifloro nunc bifloro. +Gron. virg. 129. + + + + +Habitat in +Virginia +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DD/F8/37DDF84E1F13F0B47227EF30B8CE2D22.xml b/data/37/DD/F8/37DDF84E1F13F0B47227EF30B8CE2D22.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9e4088b185e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DD/F8/37DDF84E1F13F0B47227EF30B8CE2D22.xml @@ -0,0 +1,247 @@ + + + +Flora der Schweiz und angrenzender Gebiete. Band 1. Pteridophyta bis Caryophyllaceae (2 nd edition): Registerzuband 1 + + + +Author + +Hess, Hans Ernst + + + +Author + +Landolt, Elias + + + +Author + +Hirzel, Rosmarie + +text + +1972 +Birkhaeuser Verlag + + +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291815 + +book +291815 +10.5281/zenodo.291815 +3-7643-0843-5 + + + +<subSubSection id="C4F4431434AD7604BEB89995C50D6BCF" pageId="null" pageNumber="383" type="nomenclature"> +<paragraph id="510CBF9A54873A73EF5AC393AE98C1D5" pageId="null" pageNumber="383"> +<taxonomicName id="F6375E7A0D02C607C59E9908D48FD51C" ID-CoL="8VTBX" ID-ENA="4480" authority="L." class="Liliopsida" family="Poaceae" genus="Aegilops" kingdom="Plantae" order="Poales" pageId="null" pageNumber="383" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="genus"> +<pageBreakToken id="9B4CE8A1C160A5BBA1A5DC75BC1CD154" pageId="null" pageNumber="383" start="start"> +<normalizedToken id="B37DE248A562D73A6C613118B35A4921" originalValue="Aégilops" pageId="null" pageNumber="383">Aegilops</normalizedToken> +</pageBreakToken> +L. +</taxonomicName> +</paragraph> +</subSubSection> +<subSubSection id="828CEDE77F201E42C2689406D7290776" pageId="null" pageNumber="383" type="vernacular_names"> +<paragraph id="7840493E1EE7D8EA08FC6066667603F6" pageId="null" pageNumber="383">Walch</paragraph> +</subSubSection> + + + +1 +jaehrig +. Stengel niederliegend oder bogig aufsteigend, selten aufrecht. +Blaetter +schmal, flach, meist behaart; +Blattoehrchen +bewimpert; +Blatthaeutchen +kurz, gestutzt; Blattscheiden den Stengel oft locker umfassend (aufgeblasen). +Bluetenstand +eine +Aehre +, + +eifoermig +oder +spindelfoermig +und +duenn + +( +etwa 4mal so dick wie der Stengel +), aufrecht. Achse an wenigen Stellen zur Reifezeit zerbrechlich oder +Aehre +als Ganzes abfallend. +Aehrchen +2-4 +bluetig +, im Querschnitt rundlich, die +Raender +der Spelzen +gegen +die Hauptachse gerichtet (wie bei + +Agropyron + +), +sich in die Verbiegungen und Vertiefungen der flachen Hauptachse einschmiegend. +Huellspelzen +2, gleich +gross +, auf dem +Ruecken +breit abgerundet, vielnervig, + +an der Spitze mit 1-4 +Zaehnen +oder mit 1-7 Grannen + +oder mit +Zaehnen +und Grannen, hart und +zaeh +. Deckspelzen die +Huellspelzen +nur wenig +ueberragend +, an der Spitze mit +Zaehnen +und Grannen, +aehnlich +wie die +Huellspelzen +, ebenfalls hart und +zaeh +. Vorspelzen +haeutig +. + + +Die Gattung + +Aegilops + +umfasst +nach der Monographie von Eig (1929) ( +Schluessel +, Diagnosen, zytologische Angaben, Verbreitungskarten, Abbildungen; alles nach umfangreichen Herbarstudien) +20 Arten, die im Mediterrangebiet und in Westasien verbreitet sind. Chromosomengrundzahl +ist n = 7. Nach Oehler (1958) haben 9 Arten 2n = 14 Chromosomen, wobei jede der diploiden Arten ein anderes Genom besitzt; 9 Arten haben 2n = 28 Chromosomen (bei 2 unter diesen Arten ist auch die Zahl 2n = 42 bekannt); 2 Arten haben 2n = 42 Chromosomen; alle 4 aus dem Gebiet angegebenen Arten besitzen 2n = 28 Chromosomen. Die tetraploiden Arten (2n = 28) sind +allopolyploid +(sie besitzen 2 Genome aus verschiedenen, diploiden Arten). + + +Chennaveeraiah (1960) verwendete +Genomanalyse +und +Chromosomengestalt +, um +natuerliche +Artengruppen zu bilden ( +grosses +Literaturverzeichnis). Die +Aegilopsarten +sind zytologisch eingehend untersucht, weil sie +fuer +die Entstehung der angebauten Weizensorten von theoretischer und praktischer Bedeutung sind. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+1. +Aehre +eifoermig +, bis 2 cm lang (ohne Grannen); +Huellspelzen +mit 4 Grannen + + +A. ovata + +(Nr. 1) +
+1*. +Aehre +spindelfoermig +, meist +ueber +3 cm lang (ohne Grannen); +Huellspelzen +mit 1-3 Grannen oder ohne Grannen. +
+2. +Huellspelzen +mit Grannen. +
+3. +Huellspelzen +mit 2 oder 3 Grannen + + +A. triuncialis + +(Nr. 2) +
+3*. +Huellspelzen +mit 1 Granne und 1 Zahn + + +A. cylindrica + +(Nr. 3) +
+2*. +Huellspelzen +ohne Grannen, mit 2 +Zaehnen + + +A. ventricosa + +(Nr. 4) +
+ + + + +<emphasis id="BBA9172925C68088A041030696C81BBB" italics="true" pageId="null" pageNumber="383"> +<normalizedToken id="96E9800E78EC177336F906FB13022293" originalValue="Schlüssel" pageId="null" pageNumber="383">Schluessel</normalizedToken> +zur Gattung +<taxonomicName id="8BF7F7BA754A3AC63A5805D2CE5B546A" class="Liliopsida" family="Poaceae" genus="Aegilops" kingdom="Plantae" order="Poales" pageId="null" pageNumber="383" phylum="Tracheophyta" rank="genus">Aegilops</taxonomicName> +</emphasis> + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DE/02/37DE02F54AA297A175082602D07C2AB4.xml b/data/37/DE/02/37DE02F54AA297A175082602D07C2AB4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..87d08cf2fd9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DE/02/37DE02F54AA297A175082602D07C2AB4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +Brazilian Trichoptera Checklist II + + + +Author + +Paprocki, Henrique + + + +Author + +Franca, Diogo + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1557 +1557 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1557 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1557 +1314-2828-2-1557 + + + + +Smicridea (Rhyacophylax) coronata Flint, 1980 + + + +Distribution +Espirito Santo, Minas Gerais, Mato Grosso, Sao Paulo + + +Notes + +Flint Jr 1980 +, +Albino et al. 2011 +, +Barcelos-Silva et al. 2012 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DE/6F/37DE6F6FC05E63203A6C3F51DC785449.xml b/data/37/DE/6F/37DE6F6FC05E63203A6C3F51DC785449.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1e18a158ec4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DE/6F/37DE6F6FC05E63203A6C3F51DC785449.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Sciuridae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +754 +818 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + + +Callosciurus prevostii +subsp. +rafflesii +Vigors and Horsfield 1828 + + + + + +Synonyms: + +Callosciurus prevostii +subsp. +harrisoni +(Stone and Rehn 1902) + +; + +Callosciurus prevostii +subsp. +sumatranus +(Schlegel 1863) + +. + + + + +Distribution: +S +Sumatra +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DE/C9/37DEC9A0A325005571ECF80045D10452.xml b/data/37/DE/C9/37DEC9A0A325005571ECF80045D10452.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3235a8201e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DE/C9/37DEC9A0A325005571ECF80045D10452.xml @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + +The Sawflies of Crete (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) + + + +Author + +Liston, Andrew D. + + + +Author + +Jacobs, Hans-Joachim + + + +Author + +Prous, Marko + +text + + +Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift + + +2015 + +62 + + +1 + + +65 +79 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.62.4737 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.62.4737 +1860-1324-1-65 +6CEA4772755A464EB641BE82D01160E2 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Hymenoptera Tenthredinidae + + + +* † +Hoplocampa chrysorrhoea (Klug, 1816) + + + +Material. + +Crete; 4♀♀, Marathos, 24.iii.2013. 9♀♀, Pinakiano, 27.iii.2013. 7♀♀, Mesa Potami, 28.iii.2013. 1♀, Krasi, 28.iii.2013. 10♀♀, Anogeia, 29.iii.2013. 1♀, Omalos, 21.iv.2013. Most specimens were swept from +Crataegus monogyna +with unopened inflorescences, and some others from inflorescences of cultivated +Pyrus +growing near +Crataegus +. + + +At none of the localities were +Prunus +spp. seen, although these are usually considered to be the larval hosts of +Hoplocampa chrysorrhoea +in northern parts of Central Europe (e.g. +Taeger et al. 1998 +). Perhaps +Crataegus monogyna +is a host in Crete. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DF/43/37DF438FB02122B1C990149553A7CC78.xml b/data/37/DF/43/37DF438FB02122B1C990149553A7CC78.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7f5d6c18597 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DF/43/37DF438FB02122B1C990149553A7CC78.xml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ + + + +Brazilian Trichoptera Checklist II + + + +Author + +Paprocki, Henrique + + + +Author + +Franca, Diogo + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1557 +1557 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1557 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1557 +1314-2828-2-1557 + + + + +Dolophilodes Ulmer, 1909 + + + +Notes + +Ulmer 1909 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DF/72/37DF7257546F542E800AC34FA7F62A5A.xml b/data/37/DF/72/37DF7257546F542E800AC34FA7F62A5A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dd1029c7623 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DF/72/37DF7257546F542E800AC34FA7F62A5A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ + + + +Two new genera and eight new species of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae) from Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China + + + +Author + +Lin, Yejie +Hebei Key Laboratory of Animal Diversity, College of Life Science, Langfang Normal University, Langfang 065000, China +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6789-2731 + + + +Author + +Li, Shuqiang +Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-5416 +lisq@ioz.ac.cn + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +952 + + +95 +128 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.952.51849 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.952.51849 +1313-2970-952-95 +B06E0C6B6A964AEA8BE1D121929504FD +835A323141EB524086056EB62986585C + + + + +Genus +Foliabitus Zhang & Maddison, 2012 + + + +Type species. + + +Foliabitus longzhou + +Zhang & Maddison, 2012. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/DF/D7/37DFD73CE19E5C89B2405E1EBC541011.xml b/data/37/DF/D7/37DFD73CE19E5C89B2405E1EBC541011.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5f9be794322 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/DF/D7/37DFD73CE19E5C89B2405E1EBC541011.xml @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + +Notes on the Bittacus (Mecoptera, Bittacidae) of Mozambique, with the description of a new species + + + +Author + +Midgley, John M. +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1203-3750 +KwaZulu-Natal Museum, Department Natural Sciences, 237 Jabu Ndlovu Street, Pietermaritzburg, 3201, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa & Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Makhanda, 6139, Eastern Cape, South Africa +johnmidge@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Bellingan, Terence A. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3064-1744 +Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Makhanda, 6139, Eastern Cape, South Africa & Albany Museum, Department of Entomology and Arachnology, 40 Somerset Street, Makhanda, Eastern Cape, South Africa + +text + + +African Invertebrates + + +2023 + +2023-05-05 + + +64 + + +2 + + +95 +107 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.64.85542 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.64.85542 +2305-2562-2-95 +20980566544C4F2396860E70470A2ADE +F57A483CAF2F59A19858B0245D4DF035 + + + + +Bittacus testaceus Klug, 1838 + + + +Material examined. + + +South Africa +• +1♂ +; +Mpumalanga +, +Sabie +; +-25.100566 +; +30.778525 +; +09 Jan. 1964 +; +T.R.P. de Beer +leg.; NMSA-Mec 000243 + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E0/AB/37E0AB661074DA512DB19481FEEAD4DE.xml b/data/37/E0/AB/37E0AB661074DA512DB19481FEEAD4DE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fe737f9e9ce --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E0/AB/37E0AB661074DA512DB19481FEEAD4DE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ + + + +Order Chiroptera - Family Phyllostomidae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +395 +426 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Centurio +Gray 1842 + + + + + + + +Centurio +Gray 1842 + +, +Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 1, 10: 259 + +. + + + + +Type Species: + +Centurio senex +Gray 1842 + + + + + +Synonyms: + +Trichocoryctes +Trouessart 1897 + +; + +Trichocoryes +H. Allen 1861 + +; + +Trichocorytes +Gray 1866 + +. + + + + +Species and subspecies: +1 species with 2 subspecies: + + +Species + +Centurio senex +Gray 1842 + + + +Subspecies + +Centurio senex +subsp. +senex +Gray 1842 + + + +Subspecies + +Centurio senex +subsp. +greenhalli +Paradiso 1967 + + + + + +Discussion: +Subtribe +Stenodermatina +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E0/B0/37E0B0CC761E55B5A9D519DEEBB5759C.xml b/data/37/E0/B0/37E0B0CC761E55B5A9D519DEEBB5759C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fc96936ba40 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E0/B0/37E0B0CC761E55B5A9D519DEEBB5759C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + +Checklist of the marine malacofauna of Culuccia Peninsula (NW Sardinia, Italy), with notes on relevant species + + + +Author + +Mariottini, Paolo +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1044-7108 +Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy +paolo.mariottini@uniroma3.it + + + +Author + +Smriglio, Carlo +Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy + + + +Author + +Oliverio, Marco +Dept. of Biology & Biotechnologies ' Charles Darwin', Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy + + + +Author + +Rossi, Sabrina +Biru S. r. l. Agricola, S. Teresa di Gallura (SS), Italy + + + +Author + +Di Giulio, Andrea +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0508-0751 +Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy & NBFC - National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, Italy + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2024 + +2024-02-28 + + +12 + + +115051 +115051 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e115051 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e115051 +1314-2828-12-e115051 +71D09B0C44175D4AAD6B2BD0C86E12F6 + + + + +Gibberula philippii (Monterosato, 1878) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: + +Other material +. + +Occurrence +: + +occurrenceID: +2F139A7B-735F-5DF7-A65B-4A61C83972C1 +; + +Location +: + +country: +Italy +; countryCode: IT; stateProvince: +Sassari +; locality: + +Island of Culuccia + +; verbatimLatitude: +41 13 17.70N +; verbatimLongitude: +9 17 21.41E +; geodeticDatum: WGS84 + + + + + +Notes +Shell. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E0/D6/37E0D62A0CA96414D917607F35B1E242.xml b/data/37/E0/D6/37E0D62A0CA96414D917607F35B1E242.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..431ae2f4ab7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E0/D6/37E0D62A0CA96414D917607F35B1E242.xml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Rhimphoctona (Xylophylax) melanura (Holmgren, 1860) + + + + +Pyracmon melanurus +Holmgren, 1860 + + +signata +(Habermehl, 1922, +Pyracmon +) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E1/01/37E101B7DDC70CB208AD07EAB5C5F29E.xml b/data/37/E1/01/37E101B7DDC70CB208AD07EAB5C5F29E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..86ee30210b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E1/01/37E101B7DDC70CB208AD07EAB5C5F29E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Texas spiders + + + +Author + +Dean, David Allen +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America +a-dean-ento@tamu.edu + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +2016-03-02 + + +570 + + +1 +703 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.570.6095 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.570.6095 +1313-2970-570-1 +CE0DA439F6F64DCF82255700A3C50098 +E376FF8EFFF1F22C326D1E0DFF8BFFDF +579094 + + + + +Titanebo albocaudatus (Schick, 1965) + + + + +Titanebo albocaudatus +Muster 2009 +: 54 [T], m (fig. 3) + + +Ebo albocaudatus +Schick, 1965; +Agnew et al. 1985 +: 5; +Cokendolpher et al. 1979 +: 724; +Jackman 1997 +: 166; +Knutson et al. 2010 +: 515; +Sauer and Platnick 1972 +: 52, mf, desc. (figs 24, 27); +Young and Edwards 1990 +: 20 + + + +Distribution. +Andrews, Coryell, Erath, Howard, Kimble, Llano, Martin, Maverick, Taylor, Val Verde, Webb, Wichita + + +Time of activity. +Male (May - August); female (July - October) + + +Habitat. + +(crops: cotton, peanuts); (grass: grass); (plants: miscellaneous vegetation, sage, + +Ambrosia + +sp., + +Liatris mucronata + +, + +Prionopsis ciliata + +, + +Thelesperma + +sp.); (soil/woodland: post oak savanna with pasture, saltcedar) + + + +Method. +pitfall trap [mf]; sweeping [f] + + +Type. +California, Victorville + + +Etymology. +Latin, white area on dorsum of abdomen + + +Collection. +MSU, NMSU, TAMU + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E1/37/37E137352D430DA1C71E35A7BCBFC216.xml b/data/37/E1/37/37E137352D430DA1C71E35A7BCBFC216.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8f6a0284076 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E1/37/37E137352D430DA1C71E35A7BCBFC216.xml @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Phalaena culmella +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + + +P. +Tinea +alis superioribus albidis: striis longitudinalibus albissimis terminatis ordine punctorum nigricantium transverso. + + +Fn. svec. +907. + + +Reaum. ins. +1. +t. +17. +f. +13, 14. + + +Raj. ins. +229. +n. +106. + + + + +Habitat in +Pascuis. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E1/52/37E1527A36915673A58CB38E09A82CFC.xml b/data/37/E1/52/37E1527A36915673A58CB38E09A82CFC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1131138cf6c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E1/52/37E1527A36915673A58CB38E09A82CFC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@ + + + +Three new species of Exocelina Broun, 1886 from the southern slopes of the New Guinea central range, with introduction of the Exocelina skalei group (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Copelatinae) + + + +Author + +Shaverdo, Helena +Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Burgring 7, 1010, Vienna, Austria +shaverdo@mail.ru + + + +Author + +Surbakti, Suriani +Department of Biology, Universitas Cendrawasih, Waena, Papua, Indonesia + + + +Author + +Sumoked, Bob +Walian 2, Tomohon Selatan, N Sulawesi 95439, Indonesia + + + +Author + +Balke, Michael +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3773-6586 +SNSB-Zoologische Staatssammlung Muenchen, Muenchhausenstrasse 21, D- 81247, Munich, Germany & GeoBioCenter, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2020 + +2020-12-30 + + +1007 + + +129 +143 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1007.59351 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1007.59351 +1313-2970-1007-129 +59B6D78F4C814260B82BCE74CDC6A13D +ADEE7499EE9853E1BDD6ECF092EE97F9 + + + + +Exocelina amabilis Shaverdo & Balke +sp. nov. +Figs 5 +, 6 +, 7 + + + +Type locality. + +Indonesia: Papua Province, Pegunungan Bintang Regency, south from Ok Sibil, tributary Digul River, +05°03'25.9"S +, +140°43'21.1"E +, 359 m a.s.l. + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +: male "Indonesia: Papua, S Ok Sibil, tributary Digul Riv [River], 359m, 9.vi.2015, -5,05718389 140,722535848617, Sumoked (Pap051)" (MZB). +Paratypes +: 3 males, 8 females with the same label as the holotype, 2 males additionally with green text label +"6997" +and +"6998" +(KSP, MZB). + + + +Description. + +Body size and form +: Beetle small: TL-H 2.65-3.45 mm, TL 3.55-3.85 mm, MW 1.75-1.9 mm (holotype: TL-H 3.25 mm, TL 3.65 mm, MW 1.8 mm), with oblong-oval habitus (Fig. +6 +). + + +Colouration +: Dorsally piceous (Fig. +6 +), with dark brown posterior part of head and lateral parts of pronotum, and sometimes with middle part of pronotum and elytral sutural lines; head appendages and legs yellowish-red, metathoracic legs darker distally. + + + +Figure 6. +Habitus and colouration of + +Exocelina amabilis + +sp. nov., holotype. + + + +Surface sculpture +: Relatively shiny dorsally, with very fine, sparse punctation and distinctly impressed microreticulation. Head with dense punctation (spaces between punctures 1-3 times size of punctures), distinctly finer and sparser anteriorly and posteriorly; diameter of punctures almost equal to diameter of cells of microreticulation. Pronotum with much sparser and finer punctation than head. Elytra with very sparse and fine punctation, often inconspicuous. Pronotum and elytra with distinctly impressed microreticulation; head with microreticulation stronger. Metaventrite and metacoxae distinctly microreticulate, metacoxal plates with longitudinal strioles and transverse wrinkles. Abdominal ventrites with distinct microreticulation, strioles, and very fine and sparse punctation. + + +Structures +: Pronotum with narrow lateral bead. Base of prosternum and neck of prosternal process with distinct ridge, slightly rounded anteriorly. Blade of prosternal process lanceolate, relatively broad, slightly convex, with distinct lateral bead and few setae. + + +Male +: Antenna simple. Pro- and mesotarsomeres 1-3 not dilated. Protarsomere 4 cylindrical, narrow, with medium-sized, thick, slightly curved anterolateral hook-like seta. Protarsomere 5 ventrally with anterior row of 12 and posterior row of 6 short, thick, pointed setae (Fig. +7D +). Median lobe with slightly discontinuous outline (see apically); in lateral view, more or less evenly curved, with broadly pointed apex; in ventral view, tapering to broadly pointed apex (Fig. +7A, B +). Paramere with very deep dorsal notch, separating subdistal part; subdistal part broad, transverse, situated under apex of proximal part, with large tuft of dense, thick, flattened setae; proximal setae sparse, thin, much more inconspicuous than subdistal (Fig. +7C +). Abdominal ventrite 6 with extremely weak, small medial impression, visible only apically, concave apically, with 12-16 lateral striae on each side. + + + +Figure 7. + +Exocelina amabilis + +sp. nov., paratype +A +median lobe in ventral view +B +median lobe in lateral view +C +right paramere in external view +D +right male protarsomeres 4-5 in ventral view. + + + +Female +: Pro- and mesotarsi not modified. Abdominal ventrite 6 slightly truncate or very slightly concave apically, without medial impression and lateral striae. + + + +Habitat. +The specimens were collected from the gravel banks of a primary forest stream. The beetles were mainly hidden in the coarse gravel and were only obtained after some digging. + + +Distribution. + +Indonesia: Papua Province. The species is known only from the type locality (Fig. +5 +). + + + +Etymology. + +The species name is a Latin adjective and means +"loveable" +. + + + +Affinities. + +The species evidently belongs to the + +E. ekari + +group due to the discontinuous outline of its median lobe. It is similar to + +E. utowaensis + +Shaverdo, Hendrich & Balke, 2012 in modification of the abdominal ventrite 6, body size, colouration and shape but distinctly differs from it in having a pronotal bead (absent in + +E. utowaensis + +) and different shape of the median lobe, paramere, and anterolateral hook-like seta of the male protarsomere 4 (it is also larger in + +E. utowaensis + +). The species is also similar to + +E. athesphatos + +in modification of the abdominal ventrite 6 and paramere, but distinctly differs from it in smaller size and having simple male antennae. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E1/76/37E17658CC9741A0B99FF9BEFCC45A3B.xml b/data/37/E1/76/37E17658CC9741A0B99FF9BEFCC45A3B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8c38f5d3488 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E1/76/37E17658CC9741A0B99FF9BEFCC45A3B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +bousquety1@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-11-28 + + +245 + + +1 +1722 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 +1313-2970-245-1 +FFFF52503A0AFF882450FFB66D45FF8E +578462 + + + + +Horologion speokoites Valentine, 1932 + + + + +Horologion speokoites +Valentine, 1932b: 3. Type locality: +"Arbuckle's +Cave, Maxwelton [Greenbrier County], W[est] V[irgini]a" (original citation). Holotype (♂) in USNM [# 44255]. + + + +Distribution. +This species is known only from the holotype collected in a cave three miles north of Lewisburg, near Maxwelton, in southeastern West Virginia. The cave has two rather small rooms connected by a narrow, descending, and tortuous passage. The specimen was found in the lower room, which was wet, muddy, and quite dark (Valentine 1932b: 1-2). + + +Records. + +USA +: WV + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E1/B9/37E1B9D84495434F77C5DE39661719A3.xml b/data/37/E1/B9/37E1B9D84495434F77C5DE39661719A3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f3e4b07a6c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E1/B9/37E1B9D84495434F77C5DE39661719A3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Sawflies, ' Symphyta' + + + +Author + +Liston, Andrew D. + + + +Author + +Knight, Guy T. + + + +Author + +Sheppard, David A. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1168 +1168 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1168 +1314-2828--1168 +3C3EC7B09BA145848E3E89CBBD28B432 +3C3EC7B09BA145848E3E89CBBD28B432 + + + + +Phyllocolpa plicaphylicifolia Kopelke, 2007 + + + +Distribution +Scotland + + +Notes + +Added by +Liston et al. (2012) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E2/3E/37E23EB2300A7A729332D49D03A78324.xml b/data/37/E2/3E/37E23EB2300A7A729332D49D03A78324.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8dd8087f421 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E2/3E/37E23EB2300A7A729332D49D03A78324.xml @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part A) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +252 +342 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Anthospermum ciliare +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +, ed. 2, 2 + +: 1512. 1763 + + +, +nom. utique rej. + + + +"Habitat ad Cap. b. spei." RCN: 7705. + + + + +Lectotype +(Puffin +Taxon +31: 759. 1982): Herb. Linn. No. 1233.4 ( +LINN +) + +. + + + + +Current name: + + +Anthospermum galioides + +Rchb. + +( +Rubiaceae +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E2/72/37E272B3FC36554F86AE29E1F624BAE0.xml b/data/37/E2/72/37E272B3FC36554F86AE29E1F624BAE0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2ab7ea7faab --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E2/72/37E272B3FC36554F86AE29E1F624BAE0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Floristic inventory and distribution characteristics of algific talus slopes in a specific area of forest biodiversity in South Korea + + + +Author + +Lee, Jong-Won +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-8396 +Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Yun, Ho-Geun +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Hwang, Tae Young +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Kyungmin +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Jung, Se-Hoon +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +An, Jong Bin +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea +ajb8825@korea.kr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-12-18 + + +11 + + +113952 +113952 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 +1314-2828-11-e113952 +5B963235F71B550FA1E3BC1F0E590B10 + + + + +Dactylis glomerata L., 1753 + + + +Distribution +Macaronesia, Mediterranean to Temperate Eurasia + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E2/A0/37E2A0011B8E56C1A0A6E569C2C675B9.xml b/data/37/E2/A0/37E2A0011B8E56C1A0A6E569C2C675B9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4f780decce4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E2/A0/37E2A0011B8E56C1A0A6E569C2C675B9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + +A checklist of vascular plants of the W National Park in Burkina Faso, including the adjacent hunting zones of Tapoa-Djerma and Kondio + + + +Author + +Nacoulma, Blandine M. I. +Universite Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso + + + +Author + +Schmidt, Marco +Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt am Main, Germany & Palmengarten, Frankfurt am Main, Germany +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6087-6117 +mschmidt@senckenberg.de + + + +Author + +Hahn, Karen +Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany + + + +Author + +Thiombiano, Adjima +Universite Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2020 + +8 + + +54205 +54205 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e54205 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e54205 +1314-2828-8-e54205 +AC04300B71A5532C90F2702393102067 + + + + +Amorphophallus dracontioides (Engl.) N.E.Br. + + + +Distribution +Sudanian + + +Notes +Life Form: geophyte; Voucher: Nacoulma (APPG-69734) + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E3/0F/37E30F2F8FD0813E74FEA51E75F23932.xml b/data/37/E3/0F/37E30F2F8FD0813E74FEA51E75F23932.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b810d9f8fe4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E3/0F/37E30F2F8FD0813E74FEA51E75F23932.xml @@ -0,0 +1,833 @@ + + + +Biodiversity inventories in high gear: DNA barcoding facilitates a rapid biotic survey of a temperate nature reserve + + + +Author + +Telfer, Angela C +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +atelfer@uoguelph.ca + + + +Author + +Young, Monica R +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Quinn, Jenna +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Perez, Kate +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sobel, Crystal N +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sones, Jayme E +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Levesque-Beaudin, Valerie +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Derbyshire, Rachael +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Fernandez-Triana, Jose +CNC, Ottawa, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0425-0309 + + + +Author + +Rougerie, Rodolphe +Museum national d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France + + + +Author + +Thevanayagam, Abinah +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Boskovic, Adrian +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Borisenko, Alex V +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3061-3057 + + + +Author + +Cadel, Alex +University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada + + + +Author + +Brown, Allison +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Pages, Anais +Universite de Montpellier, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Castillo, Anibal H +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1537-0528 + + + +Author + +Nicolai, Annegret +EcoBio, Universite of Rennes, Rennes, France + + + +Author + +Glenn Mockford, Barb Mockford +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Bukowski, Belen +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Wilson, Bill +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Trojahn, Brock +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Lacroix, Carole Ann +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Herbarium, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Brimblecombe, Chris +University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand + + + +Author + +Hay, Christoper +University of Western Ontario, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Ho, Christmas +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Steinke, Claudia +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Warne, Connor P +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Garrido Cortes, Cristina +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Engelking, Daniel +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Wright, Danielle +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lijtmaer, Dario A +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Gascoigne, David +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Hernandez Martich, David +Universidad Autonoma de Santo Domingo DR, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic + + + +Author + +Morningstar, Derek +Myotistar, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Neumann, Dirk +SNSB, Zoologische Staatssammlung Muenchen, Munich, Germany + + + +Author + +Steinke, Dirk +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Marco DeBruin, Donna DeBruin +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Dobias, Dylan +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sears, Elizabeth +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Richard, Ellen +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Damstra, Emily +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Zakharov, Evgeny V +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Laberge, Frederic +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Collins, Gemma E +University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand + + + +Author + +Blagoev, Gergin A +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Grainge, Gerrie +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Ansell, Graham +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Meredith, Greg +Grand River Conservation Authority, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Hogg, Ian +University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand + + + +Author + +McKeown, Jaclyn +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Topan, Janet +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Bracey, Jason +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Guenther, Jerry +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Sills-Gilligan, Jesse +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Addesi, Joseph +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Persi, Joshua +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Layton, Kara K S +The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia + + + +Author + +D'Souza, Kareina +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Dorji, Kencho +National Biodiversity Centre, Thimphu, Bhutan + + + +Author + +Grundy, Kevin +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Nghidinwa, Kirsti +Ministry of Environment and Tourism in Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia + + + +Author + +Ronnenberg, Kylee +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lee, Kyung Min +University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland + + + +Author + +Xie, Linxi +The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Lu, Liuqiong +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Penev, Lyubomir +Pensoft, Sofia, Bulgaria +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2186-5033 + + + +Author + +Gonzalez, Mailyn +Instituto de Investigacion de Recursos Biologicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogota, Colombia + + + +Author + +Rosati, Margaret E +Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, United States of America + + + +Author + +Kekkonen, Mari +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Kuzmina, Maria +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Iskandar, Marianne +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Mutanen, Marko +University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland + + + +Author + +Fatahi, Maryam +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Pentinsaari, Mikko +University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland + + + +Author + +Bauman, Miriam +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Nikolova, Nadya +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Ivanova, Natalia V +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Jones, Nathaniel +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Weerasuriya, Nimalka +The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Monkhouse, Norman +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lavinia, Pablo D +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Jannetta, Paul +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Hanisch, Priscila E +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +McMullin, R. Troy +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Herbarium, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Ojeda Flores, Rafael +Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico + + + +Author + +Mouttet, Raphaelle +ANSES, Laboratoire de la Sante des Vegetaux, Montferrier sur Lez, France + + + +Author + +Vender, Reid +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Labbee, Renee N +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Forsyth, Robert +New Brunswick Museum, Saint John, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9637-0158 + + + +Author + +Lauder, Rob +London Homeopathy, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Dickson, Ross +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Kroft, Ruth +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Miller, Scott E +Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, United States of America + + + +Author + +MacDonald, Shannon +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Panthi, Sishir +Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal + + + +Author + +Pedersen, Stephanie +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sobek-Swant, Stephanie +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Naik, Suresh +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lipinskaya, Tatsiana +Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus + + + +Author + +Eagalle, Thanushi +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Decaens, Thibaud +Universite de Montpellier Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Kosuth, Thibault +Universite de Montpellier, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Braukmann, Thomas +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Woodcock, Tom +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Roslin, Tomas +University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland + + + +Author + +Zammit, Tony +Grand River Conservation Authority, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Campbell, Victoria +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Dinca, Vlad +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Peneva, Vlada +Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria + + + +Author + +Hebert, Paul D N +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +deWaard, Jeremy R +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +dewaardj@uoguelph.ca + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +6313 +6313 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6313 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6313 +1314-2828-3-e6313 +FFE5FF837519E9253D17614AFFA8FFC1 +574474 + + + + +Asteromyia laeviana Felt, 1907 + + + +Notes +BOLD:ABV1420 + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E3/39/37E3395BBA5385482EB2B7865DBD225B.xml b/data/37/E3/39/37E3395BBA5385482EB2B7865DBD225B.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5718c828394 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E3/39/37E3395BBA5385482EB2B7865DBD225B.xml @@ -0,0 +1,248 @@ + + + +A DNA barcode-assisted annotated checklist of the spider (Arachnida, Araneae) communities associated to white oak woodlands in Spanish National Parks + + + +Author + +Crespo, Luis C + + + +Author + +Domenech, Marc + + + +Author + +Enguidanos, Alba + + + +Author + +Malumbres-Olarte, Jagoba + + + +Author + +Cardoso, Pedro + + + +Author + +Moya-Larano, Jordi + + + +Author + +Frias-Lopez, Cristina + + + +Author + +Macias-Hernandez, Nuria + + + +Author + +De Mas, Eva + + + +Author + +Mazzuca, Paola + + + +Author + +Mora, Elisa + + + +Author + +Opatova, Vera + + + +Author + +Planas, Enric + + + +Author + +Ribera, Carles + + + +Author + +Roca-Cusachs, Marcos + + + +Author + +Ruiz, Dolores + + + +Author + +Sousa, Pedro + + + +Author + +Tonzo, Vanina + + + +Author + +Arnedo, Miquel A. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2018 + +6 + + +29443 +29443 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e29443 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e29443 +1314-2828--29443 + + + + +Trachyzelotes mutabilis (Simon, 1878) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: locationID: C3; continent: Europe; country: +Spain +; countryCode: ES; stateProvince: Castilla-La Mancha; county: Ciudad Real; locality: +La Quesera +; verbatimElevation: +767.55 +; decimalLatitude: +39.36177 +; decimalLongitude: +-4.41733 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventID: L; samplingProtocol: +Pitfall + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: locationID: M1; continent: Europe; country: +Spain +; countryCode: ES; stateProvince: Extremadura; county: +Caceres +; locality: + +Pena +Falcon + +; verbatimElevation: +320.6 +; decimalLatitude: +39.83296 +; decimalLongitude: +-6.0641 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventID: F; samplingProtocol: +Pitfall + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: locationID: S1; continent: Europe; country: +Spain +; countryCode: ES; stateProvince: +Andalucia +; county: Granada; locality: +Soportujar +; verbatimElevation: +1786.57 +; decimalLatitude: +36.96151 +; decimalLongitude: +-3.41881 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventID: E; samplingProtocol: +Pitfall + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: locationID: S1; continent: Europe; country: +Spain +; countryCode: ES; stateProvince: +Andalucia +; county: Granada; locality: +Soportujar +; verbatimElevation: +1786.57 +; decimalLatitude: +36.96151 +; decimalLongitude: +-3.41881 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventID: H; samplingProtocol: +Pitfall + + + + +Distribution +Mediterranean + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E3/6C/37E36C39BC9731D565F102E111529A68.xml b/data/37/E3/6C/37E36C39BC9731D565F102E111529A68.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ed2a5886e40 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E3/6C/37E36C39BC9731D565F102E111529A68.xml @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + +Notes on Michael Schuelke's pselaphine collections from China. - Tyrini. I. genera Labomimus Sharp, Linan Hlavac and Pselaphodes Westwood (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae) + + + +Author + +Yin, Zi-Wei + + + +Author + +Li, Li-Zhen + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +251 + + +83 +118 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.251.4099 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.251.4099 +1313-2970-251-83 + + + + +Pselaphodes tibialis Yin & Li +sp. n. +Figs 15B17 + + + +Type material + +(2 ♂♂). Holotype: ♂, labeled 'CHINA: Yunnan [CH07-09], / Dali Bai Aut. Pref., Diancang Shan 45 / km NW Dali, 2730 m, +26°01'20"N +, +99°53'17"E +, creek valley, pines, ferns, / sifted, 29.V.2007, M. +Schuelke' +(cSch). Paratype: 1 ♂, same label data as holotype (cSch). + + + +Diagnosis. + +Reddish brown; length 2.52-2.58; postgenae slightly angulate posterolaterally; antennomeres +IX-XI +enlarged, IX modified in the male; pronotum with lateral margins slightly angularly expanded laterally; with metaventral processes apically enlarged; metacoxae simple; aedeagus with asymmetric median lobe. + + + +Description. + +Male (Fig. 15B). Length 2.52-2.58. Head longer than wide, HL 0.58-0.59, HW 0.54-0.55; eyes each composed of about 40 facets. Antennal clubs as in Fig. 17A. Pronotum (Fig. 17B) about as long as wide, PL 0.54-0.55, PW 0.54-0.56, with lateral margins slightly angularly expanded laterally. Elytra wider than long, EL 0.68-0.71, EW 0.99-1.00. Long metaventral (Fig. 17C) processes broadened apically. Procoxae with sharp ventral tooth, protrochanters with short thin ventral spine, profemora with long sharp spine at ventral margin (Fig. 17D), protibiae with distinct apical spur (Fig. 17E); mesotrochanters with small spine at ventral margin, mesofemora simple (Fig. 17F), mesotibiae (Fig. 17G) with big apical projection; metatrochanters and metafemora (Fig. 17H) simple. Abdomen broad at base and narrowed apically, AL 0.72-0.73, AW 1.00-1.02. Sternite IX as in Fig. 17I. Aedeagus length 0.53, with asymmetric median lobe (Figs 17 +J-L +). + +Female. Unknown. + + +Comparative notes. + +The resemblance in general habitus, antennal modification, placement of spines on the legs, and the shared modified pro- and mesotibiae place +Pselaphodes tibialis +closest to +Pselaphodes venustus +sp. n. described below. The two species can be separated by the smaller body size, the metaventral process being much thinner, and different aedeagal form in +Pselaphodes tibialis +, while +Pselaphodes venustus +is larger in size (3.07-3.34) and the metaventral process are much stouter. + + + +Distribution. +Southwest China: Yunnan. + + +Biology. +Individuals were sifted from mixed leaf litter in a ravine. + + +Etymology. + +The specific name refers to the modifications present on the pro- and mesotibiae +. + + + +Figure 17. Diagnostic features of +Pselaphodes tibialis +. A antenna B pronotum C median meteventral process, in lateral view D procoxa, protrochanter and profemur E apical portion of protibia F mesotrochanter and mesofemur G apical portion of mesotibia H metatrochanter and metafemur I sternite IX J aedeagus, in dorsal view K same, in lateral view L same, in ventral view. Scales (mm): A, B, C, D, F, H, J, K, L = 0.2; I = 0.1; E, G = 0.05. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E3/82/37E382B630F5CE828307EC0CCEB1666C.xml b/data/37/E3/82/37E382B630F5CE828307EC0CCEB1666C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..34c7a93d1ce --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E3/82/37E382B630F5CE828307EC0CCEB1666C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + +Phylogenetic relationships in Coryphantha and implications on Pelecyphora and Escobaria (Cacteae, Cactoideae, Cactaceae) + + + +Author + +Sanchez, Daniel +CONACYT-Laboratorio Nacional de Identificacion y Caracterizacion Vegetal, Departamento de Botanica y Zoologia, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biologicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Zapopan, Jalisco, C. P. 45220, Mexico & Herbario Luz Maria Villarreal de Puga, Departamento de Botanica y Zoologia, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biologicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, Zapopan, Jalisco, C. P. 45220, Mexico + + + +Author + +Vazquez-Benitez, Balbina +Coleccion de Plantas Suculentas, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, Campus II, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, C. P. 15000, CDMX, Mexico + + + +Author + +Vazquez-Sanchez, Monserrat +Programa de Posgrado en Botanica, Colegio de Postgraduados. Carretera Mexico-Texcoco Km 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de Mexico, 56230, Mexico +vazquez.monserrat@colpos.mx + + + +Author + +Aquino, David +Jardin Botanico, Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Coyoacan, 04510, CDMX, Mexico + + + +Author + +Arias, Salvador +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7674-7050 +Jardin Botanico, Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Coyoacan, 04510, CDMX, Mexico +sarias@ib.unam.mx + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2022 + +2022-01-21 + + +188 + + +115 +165 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.188.75739 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.188.75739 +1314-2003-188-115 +86E2956EE98B5D6A9103EC1CE5B30E8F + + + + + +Pelecyphora hesteri (Y.Wright) D.Aquino & Dan. +Sanchez + +comb. nov. + + + + +Coryphantha hesteri +≡ +Coryphantha hesteri +Y.Wright, Cact. Succ. J. (Los Angeles) 4: 274. 1932. +Escobaria hesteri +(Y.Wright) Buxb., Oesterr. Bot. Z. 98: 78. 1951. Type: United States, Hill on U.S. 385, 3.5 miles south of U.S. 90 east of Marathon. South side of gap and road cut. Crest of hill. Drainage Area Rio Grande, 06 Apr 1965, +L. D. Benson & B. H. Warnock +, +16500 +(neotype, designated by Benson, Cacti U. S. Canada: 961. 1982: POM [315706 image!]). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E4/1E/37E41E0F6749050B935015CDA6599800.xml b/data/37/E4/1E/37E41E0F6749050B935015CDA6599800.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eb7b0d89099 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E4/1E/37E41E0F6749050B935015CDA6599800.xml @@ -0,0 +1,235 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Caryophyllaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/caryophyllaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Dianthus seguieri +subsp. +glaber +Celak +. + + + + + +Unterart ISFS: 136760 Checklist: 1015260 +Caryophyllaceae +Dianthus +Dianthus seguieri Vill. + +Dianthus seguieri subsp. glaber +Celak +. + + + +Zusammenfassung +KEINE ANGABE + + + +Oekologie + + + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + +KEINE ANGABE + + +
+
+ + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl L--Salzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl T--
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +--
+ + + + +Nomenklatur + + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Dianthus seguieri +subsp. +glaber +Celak +. + + + + + +Volksname + + + +Deutscher Name: -- Nom +francais +: -- Nome italiano: -- + + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= + +Dianthus seguieri subsp. glaber +Celak +. + + + +Checklist 2017 + +136760
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Kommentare aus der +Checklist 2017 +Neue Unterart: Die Art wurde bisher (SISF-2) nicht in Unterarten aufgeteilt oder die Unterteilung wurde bisher nicht akzeptiert. Neu aufgenommenes Taxon +fuer +das grenznahe Ausland. Checklist + + + + +Status Indigenat +: - + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E4/AF/37E4AFEC72331C081C276732763854F6.xml b/data/37/E4/AF/37E4AFEC72331C081C276732763854F6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d75f90449e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E4/AF/37E4AFEC72331C081C276732763854F6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@ + + + +Taxonomic revision of Afrotropical Laccophilus Leach, 1815 (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) + + + +Author + +Bistroem, Olof + + + +Author + +Nilsson, Anders N. + + + +Author + +Bergsten, Johannes + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +542 + + +1 +379 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.542.5975 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.542.5975 +1313-2970-542-1 +026407877355425BAB10BF1674510F12 +026407877355425BAB10BF1674510F12 + + + + +Taxon +classification Animalia Coleoptera Dytiscidae + + + + +Laccophilus australis +sp. n. +Figs 176-177, 356, 506-507, 567 + + + + +Type +locality. + +South Africa: Zululand, Mission Rock, St. Lucia. + + +Type material + +(20 exs.). Holotype: male: "S. Afr., Zululand, St. Lucia, Mission Rock / 18.12. 1975; E-Y: 983 at black light leg. +Endroedy-Younga" +(TMSA; habitus in Fig. 506). - Paratypes: Same as holotype (5 exs. TMSA, 2 exs. MZH; habitus in Fig. 507); "S. Afr. E. Transvaal Hazyview +25.04S- +31.07E +/ 3.4. 1990 E-y: 2778, UV light trap leg. +Endroedy-Younga" +(1 ex. TMSA); "S. Afr.: Kruger Nat Pk, Skukuza research ca +25.00S- +31.35E +/ 19.2. 1995 E-Y: 3102, UV light & trap leg. +Endroedy-Younga" +(1 ex. TMSA); KwaZulu-Natal, Richards Bay, Umhlatuze Floodplain, +Papyrus +swamp, 7.6. 1985 Reavell" (4 exs. AMGS); "Natal Zululand, Mtuba-Tuba 23.9. 1947 JOC" (3 exs. AMGS). - Tanzania: "D.O. Africa Myambo 19.III. 14 leg. Methner" (1 ex. ZMHB); "Daressalaam II. 12" (1 ex. ZMHB). - Malawi: "Nyasaland +Dally's +18.12. 1946 R.H. Love B.M. 1948-309" (1 ex. BMNH). + + + +Diagnosis. + +Laccophilus australis +is characterized by colour pattern of body-dorsal-aspect, by its double reticulation on head and elytra, large meshes of which have almost disappeared by reduction and by peculiar shaped penis apex; apex truncate with distinct lateral extension. Externally it resembles of +Laccophilus secundus +and in part also of +Laccophilus luctuosus +(a species placed in an own species group 15). Penis apex extension longer in +Laccophilus australis +, in comparsion with +Laccophilus secundus +. See also diagnosis of +Laccophilus luctuosus +(p. 236). + + + +Description. +Body length 3.4-3.6 mm, width 1.9-2.0 mm. Dorsal, colour pattern of body exhibits some variation. +Head: Pale ferrugineous. Submat, finely and quite densely microsculptured. Reticulation double, but large meshes extensively, strongly reduced and hardly discernible. Almost impunctate; at eyes comparatively extensively with fine, irregular punctures. Areas of punctures extended towards middle of head-disc, forming a puncture row, however, medially very sparse. +Pronotum: Pale ferrugineous, basally in middle with a vague blackish to dark ferrugineous marking. At margins except basally in middle with fine, sparse and irregular punctures; otherwise pronotum impunctate. Submat, finely microsculptured; reticulation double. Large meshes only slightly more strongly developed than small meshes. Large meshes contain 2-5 small meshes. +Elytra: Blackish to blackish ferrugineous, with rather distinct but somewhat variable pale ferrugineous markings. Colour pattern consists of a slightly uneven, transverse, pale ferrugineous marking located close to elytral base. Post-medially with variable, longitudinal pale spots (Figs 506-507). Submat, finely and densely microsculptured; reticulation double but large meshes extensively very indistinct, in part absent. Discal row of punctures consists of fine, irregular punctures, discernible from base to apex. Besides discal row towards outer edge, punctures appear fine to very fine, sporadic, irregular and quite sparse; no distinct rows of punctures formed. Pre-apical, lateral, shallow furrow provided with some punctures and hairs. +Ventral aspect: Blackish to blackish ferrugineous, posteriorly on abdomen slightly paler; dark ferrugineous. Prothorax pale ferrugineous. Rather shiny to submat; finely microsculptured but reticulation partially reduced, absent. Ventrites with fine, slightly curved striae. Apical ventrite asymmetric, provided with a small, sharp knob on one side (Fig. 176). Almost impunctate; apical ventrite with some irregular, fine punctures. Metacoxal plates with some 8-9, transverse, shallow and in part reduced furrows. Prosternal process rather slender, posteriorly slightly extended, apically pointed. +Legs: Pro- and mesotarsus slightly extended, enlarged and provided with suckers. + +Male genitalia: Penis larger than in +Laccophilus secundus +. In lateral aspect penis straight and extreme apex with a distinct lateral extension (Fig. 356). + +Female: Apical ventrite symmetric, lacks lateral knob (Fig. 177). Pro-and mesotarsus slender. + + +Etymology. + +The species name australis is a Latin adjective meaning +"southern" +. It refers to the location from where the new species was first detected, i.e. South Africa. Later on the new species was also recorded from more northern sites in Malawi and Tanzania. + + + +Distribution. +Tanzania, Malawi, South Africa (Fig. 567). + + +Collecting circumstances. + +Flight-capable; sampled at UV and black light collection. In Kwazulu Natal sampled in a +Papyrus +swamp. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E4/F8/37E4F8ABD38C7888AA241D94538C239F.xml b/data/37/E4/F8/37E4F8ABD38C7888AA241D94538C239F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74179c3f9bd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E4/F8/37E4F8ABD38C7888AA241D94538C239F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Revised taxonomic check list of the Eurasiatic species of the subtribe Poliina (Noctuidae, Noctuinae, Hadenini) + + + +Author + +Varga, Zoltan + + + +Author + +Ronkay, Gabor + + + +Author + +Ronkay, Laszlo + +text + + +Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift + + +2017 + +64 + + +2 + + +133 +160 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.64.21455 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.64.21455 +1860-1324-2-133 +48A44E237C7345A5A86EF391F0C9383F + + + + +Polia (Atropolia) mortua kala (Swinhoe, 1900) + + + + +Hadena kala +Swinhoe, 1900, Catalogue of Eastern and Australian +Lepidoptera +Heterocera +in the Oxford University Museum 2: 17. An objective replacement name of +Mamestra nigerrima +Warren, 1888 (primary homonymy with +Mamestra nigerrima +Guenee +, 1854). + + + +Synonymy. + +Mamestra nigerrima +Warren, 1888, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1888: 302. Type-locality: India, Himachal Pradesh, Thundiani. Syntypes: 2 males and 4 females. Preoccupied, a junior primary homonym of +Mamestra nigerrima +Guenee +, 1852. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E5/4D/37E54D3D49315FADBDA256E9525F3E8A.xml b/data/37/E5/4D/37E54D3D49315FADBDA256E9525F3E8A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9cf2a31350f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E5/4D/37E54D3D49315FADBDA256E9525F3E8A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Diversity pattern of insects from Macao based on an updated species checklist after 25 years + + + +Author + +Xian, Chunlan +School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China + + + +Author + +Leong, Chi Man +Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Beijing normal university - Hong Kong Baptist University United International College, Zhuhai, China & Macao Entomological Society, Estrada Coronel Nicolau de Mesquita, Macao SAR, China + + + +Author + +Luo, Jiuyang +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2748-9534 +School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China + + + +Author + +Jia, Fenglong +School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China + + + +Author + +Han, Hongxiang +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China +hanhx@ioz.ac.cn + + + +Author + +Xie, Qiang +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6376-8808 +School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China +xieq8@mail.sysu.edu.cn + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2024 + +2024-04-05 + + +12 + + +118110 +118110 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e118110 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e118110 +1314-2828-12-e118110 +57B0CE31B4055266A115FC1275D70C79 + + + + +Cicindela kaleea Bates, 1866 + + + +Notes + +DSPA (2022) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E5/D9/37E5D983FCE50E985DA35C1F90BC1CAA.xml b/data/37/E5/D9/37E5D983FCE50E985DA35C1F90BC1CAA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d72f6f9878a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E5/D9/37E5D983FCE50E985DA35C1F90BC1CAA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + +Type material of Acanthocephala, Nematoda and other non-helminths phyla (Cnidaria, Annelida, and Arthropoda) housed in the Helminthological Collection of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute / FIOCRUZ (CHIOC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 1979 to 2016 + + + +Author + +Lopes, Daniela A. +Laboratorio de Helmintos Parasitos de Vertebrados, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Av. Brasil, 4365 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Gomes, Delir Correa +Laboratorio de Helmintos Parasitos de Vertebrados, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Av. Brasil, 4365 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil + + + +Author + +Knoff, Marcelo +Laboratorio de Helmintos Parasitos de Vertebrados, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Av. Brasil, 4365 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil +knoffm@ioc.fiocruz.br + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +2017-10-23 + + +711 + + +1 +52 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.711.14753 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.711.14753 +1313-2970-711-1 +D94E8B43C7A7447386D4FFBFAD6852DC +FFC4FE3CFFAAFF87F42FFF91FFACFFC3 +1149948 + + + + +Capillostrongyloides arapaimae Santos, Moravec & Venturieri, 2008 + + + +Type host. + + +Arapaima gigas + +(Schinz, 1822) ( +Osteichthyes +: +Arapaimidae +). + + + +Infection site. +Anterior part of intestine and pyloric caeca. + + +Type locality. + +Brazil, +Para +State, Mexiana Island (Amazon River delta), natural canals and breeding tanks of fish farm at Santo +Ambrosio +Farm ( +00°05'30"S +, +49°34'50"W +). + + + + +Holotype +. + +♂ CHIOC 35559 a. + + +Paratypes. +CHIOC 35559 b (allotype ♀), 35559 c-d (♂, ♀). + + +Reference. + +Santos et al. (2008a) +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E6/06/37E6067CCF24B3B768E828C4B305AD52.xml b/data/37/E6/06/37E6067CCF24B3B768E828C4B305AD52.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..faff32de296 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E6/06/37E6067CCF24B3B768E828C4B305AD52.xml @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Platygastroidea + + + +Author + +Buhl, Peter N. + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + + + +Author + +Notton, David G. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +7991 +7991 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7991 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e7991 +1314-2828-4-7991 + + + + +Teleas Latreille, 1809 + + + + +PROTELEAS +Kozlov, 1961 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E8/31/37E831777FA7B58703B89FAD36D299A6.xml b/data/37/E8/31/37E831777FA7B58703B89FAD36D299A6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..71f4e458a7d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E8/31/37E831777FA7B58703B89FAD36D299A6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ + + + +Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1758 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://archive.org/download/mobot31753000798865/mobot31753000798865.pdf + +book +2C6327E1-5560-4DB4-B9CA-76A0FA03D975 +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 +3922206 + + + + +Tabanus tropicus +[ +spec. nov. +] + + + + +T. oculis fasciis ternis fuscis, abdominis lateribus ferrugineis. +Fn. svec. +1047. + + + + +Habitat in +Europa, +Equis instante pluvia molestus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E8/48/37E8484574A7A42CE7EB8BCE213F368A.xml b/data/37/E8/48/37E8484574A7A42CE7EB8BCE213F368A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a98ef282e16 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E8/48/37E8484574A7A42CE7EB8BCE213F368A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + +Revisions and key to the Vernonieae (Compositae) of Thailand + + + +Author + +Bunwong, Sukhonthip +Maejo University Phrae Campus, Mae Sai, Rong Kwang, Phrae 54140, Thailand + + + +Author + +Chantaranothai, Pranom +Applied Taxonomic Research Center, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand + + + +Author + +Keeley, Sterling C. +Department of Botany, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96816 USA + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2014 + +2014-05-13 + + +37 + + +25 +101 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.37.6499 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.37.6499 +1314-2003-37-25 +FFE8FFACFF84FFA95573FFFECD03F742 +576215 + + + + +Ethulia conyzoides L., Sp. Pl.: 1171. 1763. + + + +Type. + +Egypt, +P. Forsskal +1387 (holotype: K!). + + + +Description. +Annual herbs, 50-150 cm tall. Stems erect, conspicuously ribbed, puberulous. Leaves alternate, 5-8 by 1-2 cm, elliptic or lanceolate, margin serrate, apex acuminate or acute, base attenuate, chartaceous; both surfaces ferrugineous with unicellular hairs and capitate glands, shortly petiolate. Capitulescences terminal and axillary, corymbose. Capitula hemispherical, 3-4 mm long. Receptacle ca. 1.5 mm in diam., glabrous. Involucres semispherical, in 3-4 series, 1.5-2 mm long, 1-2 mm in diam. Phyllaries imbricate, green with purple apex, margin piliferous, outer surface puberulous, glands capitate; the outer and the middle ones ovate to lanceolate, apex acute; the inner ones lanceolate to oblong, apex acute. Florets 20-30; corollas funnelform, purple, glandular; corolla tubes 0.5-1 mm long; corolla lobes ca. 1 mm long. Anthers 1.5-2 mm long, apical appendage acute, base obtuse. Styles purple, inner surface covered with stigmatic papillae, sweeping hairs. Achenes turbinate, 1.5-2 mm long, glandular, 6-ribbed. Pappus absent. + + +Distribution. +Thailand: Chiang Rai, Chiang Mai, Nakhon Phanom. Tropics. + + +Specimens examined. + +Thailand: Chiang Rai, Mae Kok riverbank, Lamnam Kok national park, +19°57.49'N +, +99°41.14'E +, 14 Jun 1925, +H.B.G. Garrett +227 (BKF, BM, K); Nakhon Phanom, 10 May 1932, +A.F.G. Kerr +21396 (BK, BM, K); Nakhon Phanom, 9 May 1932, +A.F.G. Kerr +21809 (K). + + + +Diagnostic characters. + +Ethulia conizoides +is distinguished by achenes having 4-6 ribs, pappus and carpopodium are absent. + + + +Ecology. +Open area along river bank in evergreen forest, alt. 200-400 m; flowering May to September. + + +Vernacular name. +Ya Hua Mud (หญ้าหัวหมุด). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E8/E2/37E8E2D4F12CB8A1492C1E66EAB76B60.xml b/data/37/E8/E2/37E8E2D4F12CB8A1492C1E66EAB76B60.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d86bd9d1479 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E8/E2/37E8E2D4F12CB8A1492C1E66EAB76B60.xml @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ + + + +Leptocephali collected off the eastern coast of Brazil (12 ° – 23 ° S). + + + +Author + +Marcia Salustiano de Castro + + + +Author + +Ana Cristina Teixeira Bonecker + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2005 + +935 + + +1 +28 + + + + +http://www.zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3EA0A64C-D816-4404-8602-B8A4A37D170E + +journal article +z00935p001 +3EA0A64C-D816-4404-8602-B8A4A37D170E + + + + +Study Material - +M. plumbeus +: DZUFRJ 2899, 2900, 2901; three specimens; preanal myomeres 58-64; predorsal myomeres 26-33; nephric myomeres 57-63; total myomeres ca 148; 39.5-87.0 mm SL. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E8/EB/37E8EBD20D058324732435C985FFB810.xml b/data/37/E8/EB/37E8EBD20D058324732435C985FFB810.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e6f67d0b133 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E8/EB/37E8EBD20D058324732435C985FFB810.xml @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Tribe +Megamerini Chapuis, 1874 + + + + + +Megamerites + +Chapuis, 1874: 30 [stem: Megamer-]. Type genus: +Megamerus +W. S. MacLeay, 1827. Comment: original vernacular name available (Art. 11.7.2): first used in latinized form by Jacoby (1903: 2, as +Megamerinae +), generally accepted as in Clavareau (1913a: 4, as +Megamerini +); First Reviser ( +Megamerini +Chapuis, 1874 vs +Ametallini +Chapuis, 1874 vs +Mecynoderini +Chapuis, 1874) not determined, current usage maintained. + + + +Ametallites + +Chapuis, 1874: 46 [stem: Ametall-]. Type genus: +Ametalla +Hope, 1840. Comment: original vernacular name available (Art. 11.7.2): first used in latinized form by Jacoby (1903: 1, as +Ametallinae +), generally accepted as in Clavareau (1913a: 12, as +Ametallini +). + + + +Mecynoderites + +Chapuis, 1874: 44 [stem: Mecynoder-]. Type genus: +Mecynodera +Hope, 1840. Comment: original vernacular name available (Art. 11.7.2): first used in latinized form by Jacoby (1903: 1, as +Mecynoderinae +), generally accepted as in Clavareau (1913a: 11, as +Mecynoderini +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E9/06/37E9060011CA9C6F25AF0C24BC9E62BB.xml b/data/37/E9/06/37E9060011CA9C6F25AF0C24BC9E62BB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..435a8ac982f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E9/06/37E9060011CA9C6F25AF0C24BC9E62BB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +Brazilian Trichoptera Checklist II + + + +Author + +Paprocki, Henrique + + + +Author + +Franca, Diogo + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1557 +1557 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1557 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1557 +1314-2828--1557 + + + + +Nectopsyche aureovittata Flint, 1983 + + + +Distribution +Minas Gerais, Parana, Rio de Janeiro, Santa Catarina, Sao Paulo + + +Notes + +Flint Jr 1983a +, +Almeida and Marinoni 2000 +, +Blahnik et al. 2004 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E9/76/37E9761C01677108A5863CBD2D1915DF.xml b/data/37/E9/76/37E9761C01677108A5863CBD2D1915DF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7f3946856dd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E9/76/37E9761C01677108A5863CBD2D1915DF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ + + + +A DNA barcode-assisted annotated checklist of the spider (Arachnida, Araneae) communities associated to white oak woodlands in Spanish National Parks + + + +Author + +Crespo, Luis C + + + +Author + +Domenech, Marc + + + +Author + +Enguidanos, Alba + + + +Author + +Malumbres-Olarte, Jagoba + + + +Author + +Cardoso, Pedro + + + +Author + +Moya-Larano, Jordi + + + +Author + +Frias-Lopez, Cristina + + + +Author + +Macias-Hernandez, Nuria + + + +Author + +De Mas, Eva + + + +Author + +Mazzuca, Paola + + + +Author + +Mora, Elisa + + + +Author + +Opatova, Vera + + + +Author + +Planas, Enric + + + +Author + +Ribera, Carles + + + +Author + +Roca-Cusachs, Marcos + + + +Author + +Ruiz, Dolores + + + +Author + +Sousa, Pedro + + + +Author + +Tonzo, Vanina + + + +Author + +Arnedo, Miquel A. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2018 + +6 + + +29443 +29443 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e29443 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e29443 +1314-2828--29443 + + + + +Araneus grossus (C. L. Koch, 1844) + + + +Materials + + +Type status: +Other material +. Occurrence: individualCount: +1 +; sex: +male +; Location: locationID: C3; continent: Europe; country: +Spain +; countryCode: ES; stateProvince: Castilla-La Mancha; county: Ciudad Real; locality: +La Quesera +; verbatimElevation: +767.55 +; decimalLatitude: +39.36177 +; decimalLongitude: +-4.41733 +; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventID: 2; samplingProtocol: +Beating +; eventTime: Night + + + + +Distribution +Europe to Central Asia + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E9/9B/37E99B5AEE85CCE4EC9BE10813EE1779.xml b/data/37/E9/9B/37E99B5AEE85CCE4EC9BE10813EE1779.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f5dc6ec3182 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E9/9B/37E99B5AEE85CCE4EC9BE10813EE1779.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta) + + + +Author + +Bouchard, Patrice + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves + + + +Author + +Davies, Anthony E. + + + +Author + +Alonso-Zarazaga, Miguel A. + + + +Author + +Lawrence, John F. + + + +Author + +Lyal, Chris H. C. + + + +Author + +Newton, Alfred F. + + + +Author + +Reid, Chris A. M. + + + +Author + +Schmitt, Michael + + + +Author + +Ślipinski, S. Adam + + + +Author + +Smith, Andrew B. T. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2011 + +88 + + +1 +972 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 +1313-2970-88-1 + + + + +Subtribe +Eucibdelina Sharp, 1889 + + + + +Eucibdelini +Sharp, 1889: 112 [stem: Eucibdel-]. Type genus: +Eucibdelus +Kraatz, 1859. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/E9/CA/37E9CA4136C0B2174DC8F6B86C0147A7.xml b/data/37/E9/CA/37E9CA4136C0B2174DC8F6B86C0147A7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..248705d7aa5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/E9/CA/37E9CA4136C0B2174DC8F6B86C0147A7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - aculeates (Apoidea, Chrysidoidea and Vespoidea) + + + +Author + +Else, George R. + + + +Author + +Bolton, Barry + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8050 +8050 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8050 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8050 +1314-2828--8050 + + + + +Bombus (Psithyrus) vestalis (Geoffroy, 1785) + + + + +Apis vestalis +Geoffroy, 1785 + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EB/88/37EB88918E7653A28B7A1A9517427F3A.xml b/data/37/EB/88/37EB88918E7653A28B7A1A9517427F3A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d997be7a7ef --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EB/88/37EB88918E7653A28B7A1A9517427F3A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ + + + +Resurrection of Stipa tremula and taxonomy of the high-alpine species from the Stipa purpurea complex (Poaceae, Pooideae) + + + +Author + +Nobis, Marcin +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1594-2418 +Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 3, 30 - 387 Krakow, Poland +m.nobis@uj.edu.pl + + + +Author + +Krzempek, Marta +Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 3, 30 - 387 Krakow, Poland + + + +Author + +Nowak, Arkadiusz +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8638-0208 +Institute of Biology, University of Opole, 45 - 052 Opole, Poland & Botanical Garden, Center for Biological Diversity Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02 - 976 Warszawa, Poland + + + +Author + +Gudkova, Polina D. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6537-8018 +Research Laboratory ' Herbarium', National Research Tomsk State University, Lenin 36 Ave., 634050 Tomsk, Russia & Institute of Biology, Altai State University, Lenin 61 Ave., 656049, Barnaul, Russia + + + +Author + +Klichowska, Ewelina +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9641-5750 +Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 3, 30 - 387 Krakow, Poland +ewelina.klichowska@uj.edu.pl + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2022 + +2022-05-13 + + +196 + + +21 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.196.82598 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.196.82598 +1314-2003-196-21 +A221AFB3297756818D82E7B978F2E682 + + + + + +Stipa +x +ladakhensis M. Nobis, Klichowska, A. Nowak & P.D. Gudkova, nothosp. nov.(S. klimesii +x +S. purpurea s.l.) + + + + + +Fig. 5 + + + + +Type +. + + + +NW +India +, +Jammu and Kashmir State +, +Ladakh Region +: +Zanskar +: +Zara +, +Spangchen Do +, alt. + +4520 m + +, +1 Sep 2001 +, +33°22.7'N +, +77°45.1'E +, code 01-34-13, + + +L. +Klimes + +1474 + +( +holotype +KRA 603490!, isotypes PR!, KRA 603487!, 603486!) + + + + +Figure 5. +The +holotype +of + + +Stipa +x +ladakhensis + + +M. Nobis, Klichowska, A. Nowak & P.D. Gudkova. + + + + +Description. + +Plant perennial +, densely tufted, with a few culms and numerous vegetative shoots; culms 35-55 cm tall, 1-2-noded, nodes distributed close together and only in the lowermost part of the culm. +Leaves of vegetative shoots +: sheaths shortly and densely pubescent; +ligules +acute, on the external sheaths (1.0-)1.2-2.0(-2.8) mm long, whereas, on the internal sheaths (1.5-)2.0-4.0(-5.5) mm long; +blades +convolute, green, pale green to glaucous 10-25 cm long, 0.3-0.5 mm in diameter, adaxial surface covered by 0.15-0.2 mm long hairs, abaxial surface scabrous. +Cauline leaves +: lower sheaths shortly pubescent, upper scabrous or glabrous; +ligules +acute, (1.0-)2.0-4.0(-5.0) mm long; +blades +of convolute, green or pale green, adaxial surface shortly pubescent, abaxial surface scabrous or glabrous. +Panicle +17-25 cm long, rather contracted, with 15-23 spikelets, at base enclosed by the sheath of the uppermost leaf or exerted, lower branches 2-6 cm long, straight or slightly flexuous, setulose or glabrous, single or paired. +Glumes +subequal, brownish to purplish, glumes 16-19(-20) mm long, narrowly lanceolate, tapering into long hyaline apex. +Floret +(lemma + callus) 8.5-10.2 mm long and 0.7-0.9 mm wide. +Callus +1.5-1.9 mm long, densely and long-pilose, the base of callus narrow, peripheral ring 0.15-0.20 mm in diameter, acute, scar narrow elliptic. +Lemma +coriaceous, straw-coloured, brownish or purplish; covered throughout (from the bottom to top) by dense ascending to appressed hairs 0.2-0.4 mm long. +Awn +46-58 mm long, bigeniculate, +lower segment of the awn +8-11 mm long, twisted, with 1.7-2.3 mm long hairs, +middle segment of the awn +4-9 mm long, twisted, with 1.6-2.2 mm long hairs; +terminal segment of the awn +(seta) flexuous 30-42 mm long with hairs shorter to equal to those on the column, 1.6-2.1 mm long, gradually decreasing in length towards the apex. +Palea +equalling lemma in length. + + + +Habitat. +High mountain semi-deserts, on the elevation from 4000 to 5000 m. + + +Distribution. +W Himalayas (NW India). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EB/B7/37EBB7B111CD2FA6631C2EFC392A5A28.xml b/data/37/EB/B7/37EBB7B111CD2FA6631C2EFC392A5A28.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7dfc01e3e1a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EB/B7/37EBB7B111CD2FA6631C2EFC392A5A28.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Guide to the Vascular Flora of the Savannas and Flatwoods of Shaken Creek Preserve and Vicinity (Pender & Onslow Counties, North Carolina, U. S. A.) + + + +Author + +Thornhill, Robert + + + +Author + +Krings, Alexander + + + +Author + +Lindbo, David + + + +Author + +Stucky, Jon + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1099 +1099 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1099 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1099 +1314-2828--1099 + + + + +Sassafras albidum J. Presl + + + +Distribution +Pine/scrub oak sandhills (PSOS-MT), mesic pine savannas (MPS-CP). + + +Notes + +Infrequent. +Mar-Apr +; +Jun-Jul +. Thornhill 1534 (NCSC). Specimens seen in the vicinity: Sandy Run [RMK]: Taggart SARU 222 (WNC!). [= RAB, FNA, Weakley] + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EB/CF/37EBCF616CB76618674C8A0ED4CFCA8C.xml b/data/37/EB/CF/37EBCF616CB76618674C8A0ED4CFCA8C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..96f1255d514 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EB/CF/37EBCF616CB76618674C8A0ED4CFCA8C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ + + + +Nematodes from terrestrial and freshwater habitats in the Arctic + + + +Author + +Holovachov, Oleksandr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1165 +1165 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1165 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1165 +1314-2828-2-1165 + + + + +Paratrilobus rapis Gagarin, 1991* + + + +Notes + +Taymyr and Severnaya Zemlya, Russia ( +Gagarin 1990 +, +Gagarin 1991a +, +Gagarin 1993 +, +Gagarin 2001b +, +Gagarin 2001a +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EB/F1/37EBF15E01AC5AB8A65F13945BB01B43.xml b/data/37/EB/F1/37EBF15E01AC5AB8A65F13945BB01B43.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7bc076b889 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EB/F1/37EBF15E01AC5AB8A65F13945BB01B43.xml @@ -0,0 +1,342 @@ + + + +Diversity underfoot of agromyzids (Agromyzidae, Diptera) mining thalli of liverworts and hornworts + + + +Author + +Kato, Makoto +kato@zoo.zool.kyoto-u.ac.jp + + + +Author + +Yamamori, Luna +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5342-1277 + + + +Author + +Imada, Yume +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2173-7389 + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2022 + +2022-11-30 + + +1133 + + +1 +164 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1133.94530 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1133.94530 +1313-2970-1133-1 +D7A37FE0DC2A4ECCA6A10E873C7C7A5A +4C6A7FCDB0B55088AED4D861AF5BE503 + + + + +14. +Phytoliriomyza longifurcae Kato +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 27 +, 28 + + + +Material examined. + +Holotype +: +Japan: 1♂ (MK-AG-a500), Sui, Anan, Tokushima Pref. ( +33.9044°N +, +134.5391°E +, 40 m asl), 30-III-2021 (as larva), emerged on 14-V-2021, NSMT-I-Dip 31968. +Paratypes +: +Japan: 3♀ (MK-AG-a497-499), same data as holotype, emerged on 14-17-V-2021, NSMT-I-Dip 31969-31971. + + + +Other material. +Japan: 4♂3♀, Kamihirayama, Tatsuyama, Tenryu, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Pref., 7-XI-2010 (as larva), emerged on 18-28-IV-2011; 1♂1♀, Chiromo, Toyotama, Tsushima, Nagasaki Pref., 28-XI-2011 (as larva), emerged on 1-V-2011; 2♀, Kibune, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto Pref., 20-VI-2016 (as larva), emerged on 14-VII-2021. + + +Diagnosis. + +A medium-sized species (wing length 1.5-1.6 mm) having a subshiny yellow scutum with a medial and two pairs of lateral black stripes, yellow 1st flagellomere, yellow maxillary palpus, yellow halteres, and yellow legs. Male epandrium inner-basally with a comb comprising six fused long tubercle-like setae, and inner-subdistally with an extremely elongated arm, which apically bears two dark, diverging, ventrally curved, tubercle-like setae. Larva mines the thallus of + +Reboulia hemisphaerica orientalis + +. + + + +Description. + +Adult male +(Fig. +27A-E +). + + +Head +: +Head entirely yellow, with ocellar tubercle brown, and back of head dark brown (Fig. +27C +). Antenna porrect, yellow. Arista subbasal, brown, pubescent. Frons with brownish reflective pruinosity. Face, gena, parafacial and postgena yellow. Proboscis normal, yellow; palpus yellow, cylindrical (Fig. +27C +). +Chaetotaxy +: +Front orbitals three pairs; one ori directed inward; two ors directed upward (Fig. +27B +). Orbital setulae minute and erect, in a single row. + + + +Figure 27. + +Phytoliriomyza longifurcae + +sp. nov. +A-E +holotype male +A +habitus +B +lateral +C +frontal +D +dorsal +E +posterior +F, G +paratype female (MK-AG-a497) +F +dorsal +G +lateral +H-L +male genitalia +H +epandrium, ventral +I +whole genitalia, ventral +J, K +phallic complex, ventral and lateral +L +ejaculatory apodeme, lateral. + + + +Thorax +: +Thorax subshiny yellow. Scutum with medial black stripe on anterior 2/3, one pair of black suborbicular presutural spots confluent with the medial stripe, a pair of narrow black supra-alar stripes and a pair of wider black intra-alar stripes, which adjoin the pair of lateral presutural black suborbicular spots (Fig. +27D +). Mediotergite brown, anatergite yellow, katatergite brown (Fig. +27E +). Pleuron largely yellow (the background color sometimes grayish in some localities); propleuron with small brown patch on mid-anterior corner; anepisternum with two small spots on anterior and posterior corners; anepimeron with a narrow brown patch on anterior corner; katepisternum and meron with brown patches on venter (Fig. +27B +). Haltere yellow, while dorsal surface grayish yellow. Calypter margin and hairs gray. Leg segments yellow; tibia and tarsus darker. +Chaetotaxy +: +Scutum with 1+3 dorsocentrals, shortened anteriorly (Fig. +27D +). Acrostichal setulae five pairs in two irregular rows. +Wing +: +Wing length 1.5 mm, costa reaching M1 (Fig. +27A +). Length of ultimate section of vein M4 divided by penultimate section 1.6. + + +Abdomen +: +Abdomen dorsally subshiny yellow (Fig. +27E +). +Genitalia +: +(Fig. +27H-L +) Epandrium dark brown, rounded apically; inner-lateral margin with a row of four short tubercle-like setae; inner-subdistal margin with an extremely elongated arm, bearing two, dark, ventrally curved, tubercle-like setae borne at wide angle (90-120°); inner-basal surface with a comb comprising 4-6 fused tubercle-like setae (Fig. +27K +). Surstylus lobate, directed inwards, setose apically, with one short tubercle-like seta subapically (Fig. +27K +). Cercus narrow, setose. Subepandrial sclerite with a pair of flat, pale, ventral lobes, each of which bearing a long seta subapically (Fig. +27K +). Hypandrium thin, slightly sclerotized along outer margin (Fig. +27H +). Postgonite bare, goose barnacle-shaped, cleft apically; upper lobe pointed apically (Fig. +27K +). Phallophorus with deep incision below (Fig. +27I +), articulated with phallapodeme, fused to epiphallus (Fig. +27J +). Basiphallus dorsally sclerotized with basal expanded lobes (Fig. +27I, J +). Hypophallus broad, lightly sclerotized, lateral lobes expanded anteriorly like wings, clear tubule emerging from median part (Fig. +27I +). Mesophallus dark, cylindrical, constricted subapically. Paraphalli membranous, rounded and expanded ventrally, bilaterally asymmetrical; right one larger than left one (Fig. +27I +). Distiphallus comprising one pair of stout tubules basally parallel to each other; basal half composed of lateral dark lanceolate sclerite and weaker medial region; distal half cylindrical, dorsally and laterally pigmented, with truncated, flared clear apex (Fig. +27J +). Ejaculatory apodeme pale and fan-shaped with broad stalk; base wide to one side; sperm pump clear (Fig. +27L +). + + +Female +(Fig. +27F, G +). Similar to male, but larger, frons wider. Wing length 1.6&nbsp;mm. +Postabdomen +: +(Fig. +28A, B +) Oviscape dark brown, setigerous (Fig. +28A +). Tergite 10 trifurcate, laterally uniting narrow pleural sclerites (Fig. +28B +). Each cercus with two stout, apical, trichoid sensilla, +3/4 +length of cercus (Fig. +28B +). Spermathecae semi-orbicular, with truncate proximal ends (Fig. +28A +). + + + +Figure 28. +Female morphology and larval/adult ecology of + +Phytoliriomyza longifurcae + +sp. nov. +A, B +female postabdomen +A +oviscape and spermatheca +B +tergite 10 +C +live fly +D +habitat at Sui +E +mined thalli of + +Reboulia hemisphaerica orientalis + +. + + + + +Etymology. + +The specific name ( +longus += long, +furca += fork) refers to extremely elongated, apically biforked tubercle-like seta on the male epandrium. + + + +Japanese name. +Sasumata-jingasagoke-hamoguribae. + + +Host plant. + + +Reboulia hemisphaerica orientalis + +( +Aytoniaceae +). + + + +Mine. + +Larvae construct linear-blotch mines in the thallus, and pupate in the mines (Fig. +28E, F +). + + + +Biological notes. + +The habitats of this species are rocky cliffs in warm temperate evergreen forests (Fig. +28D +). This species is rarer than + +P. argentifasciata + +, and sympatric with the latter in some localities. Our rearing records suggest that adults emerge from overwintered pupae in spring. + + + +Distribution. + +Japan: Honshu, Shikoku (Fig. +26 +). + + + +Remarks. + +This species resembles + +P. argentifasciata + +and + +P. nigroflava + +in having two pair of dark lateral bands on the scutum, and a yellow 1st flagellomere and yellow haltere; it is distinguished from + +P. argentifasciata + +by the black lateral stripes (inner bands reflecting silverly in sunlight in + +P. argentifasciata + +), from + +P. nigroflava + +by the absence of an extremely extended, forked tubercle-like seta on the subdistal margin of the male epandrium. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EC/20/37EC209B24DF53B188D646BAEA420667.xml b/data/37/EC/20/37EC209B24DF53B188D646BAEA420667.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3f1d5ac3f20 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EC/20/37EC209B24DF53B188D646BAEA420667.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Catalogue of Geadephaga (Coleoptera, Adephaga) of America, north of Mexico + + + +Author + +Bousquet, Yves +Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada +bousquety1@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2012 + +2012-11-28 + + +245 + + +1 +1722 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 +1313-2970-245-1 +FFFF52503A0AFF882450FFB66D45FF8E +578462 + + + + +Omus californicus angustocylindricus Horn, 1913 + + + + +Omus californicus angusto-cylindricus +W. Horn, 1913: 348. Type locality: "Lassen Co[unty] borealis, Calif[ornia]" (original citation). Syntype(s) in MHNP and MCZ [# 25599]. + + +Omus cylindricus +Casey, 1914: 4. Unjustified emendation of + +Omus angustocylindricus + +Horn, 1913. + + + +Distribution. +This subspecies, also known as the "Narrow Night-stalking Tiger Beetle", is found above 1500 m of elevation in Plumas and Lassen Counties in northeastern California (Leffler 1979a: 218). + + +Records. + +USA +: CA + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EC/B4/37ECB48AD86050F7AB814CAADB108F15.xml b/data/37/EC/B4/37ECB48AD86050F7AB814CAADB108F15.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a7454ffeddc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EC/B4/37ECB48AD86050F7AB814CAADB108F15.xml @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ + + + +Cryptophyllium, the hidden leaf insects - descriptions of a new leaf insect genus and thirteen species from the former celebicum species group (Phasmatodea, Phylliidae) + + + +Author + +Cumming, Royce T. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7930-1292 +Montreal Insectarium, 4581 rue Sherbrooke est, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H 1 X 2 B 2 & Richard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA & Biology, Graduate Center, City University of New York, NY, USA +roycecumming@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Bank, Sarah +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6952-1590 +Department of Animal Evolution and Biodiversity, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, University of Go ̈ ttingen, Untere Karspu ̈ le 2, 37073, Go ̈ ttingen, Germany +sarah.bank@uni-goettingen.de + + + +Author + +Bresseel, Joachim +Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, O. D. Taxonomy and Phylogeny and JEMU, rue Vautier 29, B- 1000, Brussels, Belgium + + + +Author + +Constant, Je ́ ro ̂ me +Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, O. D. Taxonomy and Phylogeny and JEMU, rue Vautier 29, B- 1000, Brussels, Belgium + + + +Author + +Tirant, Stephane Le +Montreal Insectarium, 4581 rue Sherbrooke est, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H 1 X 2 B 2 + + + +Author + +Dong, Zhiwei +State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China + + + +Author + +Sonet, Gontran +Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, O. D. Taxonomy and Phylogeny and JEMU, rue Vautier 29, B- 1000, Brussels, Belgium + + + +Author + +Bradler, Sven +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9307-1032 +Department of Animal Evolution and Biodiversity, Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, University of Go ̈ ttingen, Untere Karspu ̈ le 2, 37073, Go ̈ ttingen, Germany + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2021 + +2021-02-18 + + +1018 + + +1 +179 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1018.61033 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1018.61033 +1313-2970-1018-1 +7E9360A5A359437A91C004C74B1FE9D6 +84B0D9BEE71D5171B80C3F4CBFDC7366 + + + + +Cryptophyllium drunganum (Yang, 1995) +comb. nov. +Figures 28 +, 29 + + + +Material examined. + +We examined the holotype female from within the Beijing Agricultural University from detailed photographs taken by Yu-Chen Zheng (China Agricultural University, China). Additionally, we examined a tentatively identified male from "Yunnan China: Qinglangdang, Dulongjiang Township, Gongshan County, Nujiang Prefecture, II-2016, Local" (Coll ZD).A tentative male specimen collected very near the type locality was used in our molecular analysis, which cannot be confidently confirmed as + +Cryptophyllium drunganum + +comb. nov. due to extreme sexual dimorphism of the phylliids and lack of a fresh tissue sample from a true + +Cryptophyllium drunganum + +comb. nov. female (Fig. +29 +). + + + +Remarks. + +This species is only known at present from the morphologically unique holotype female from northern Yunnan Province (Fig. +28 +). However, this area is not known for a high diversity of species, so we are fairly confident that this male represents the undescribed + +Cryptophyllium drunganum + +comb. nov. male. Also, this male specimen was molecularly recovered as distinct to the other species described from China as we have successfully sampled almost all species of + +Cryptophyllium + +gen. nov. and included them in our molecular phylogeny (Fig. +4 +). + + + +Figure 28. + +Cryptophyllium drunganum + +comb. nov. holotype female within the Beijing Agricultural University, photographed by Yu-Chen Zheng (China Agricultural University, China) +A +habitus, dorsal, inset specimen data labels +B +details of antennae, head, and anterior of the thorax. + + + + +Figure 29. +Presumed male + +Cryptophyllium drunganum + +comb. nov. male used within our molecular analysis (sample DZW05), from Du Longjiang Township, Nujian Lisu Autonomous Prefecture, photographs by Zhiwei Dong (KIZ) +A +habitus, dorsal +B +details of the legs and thorax, ventral. + + + + +Differentiation. + +Females are morphologically similar to + +Cryptophyllium tibetense + +comb. nov. and + +Cryptophyllium liyananae + +sp. nov. due to the long alae, rounded exterior profemoral lobe, mesopleura which are distinctly reaching the anterior margin but slightly curved on the anterior end (not perfectly straight margined), boxy abdomen with a notable bend on abdominal segment VII, and the presence of small exterior lobes on all tibiae. Both of these species can be differentiated by the length of the subgenital plate as in + +Cryptophyllium drunganum + +comb. nov. it is short, just passing the anterior margin on the tenth abdominal segment, and in the other species it is at least three quarters of the length of the tenth abdominal segment (in + +Cryptophyllium liyananae + +sp. nov.) or even longer and exceeding the tip of the abdomen (in + +Cryptophyllium tibetense + +comb. nov.). + + +Our male specimen is morphologically similar to + +Cryptophyllium tibetense + +comb. nov. and + +Cryptophyllium yunnanense + +comb. nov. due to the shape of the profemoral exterior lobe which smoothly arcs end to end without a distinct bend, the exterior profemoral lobe that is the same width or slightly thinner than the interior lobe (not wider as is common in many of the + +Cryptophyllium + +gen. nov. species), tegmina which are long reaching the anterior margin of abdominal segment IV or slightly passing it, a similar spade-shaped abdomen, and prominent tubercles on the mesopleura. + + + +Cryptophyllium tibetense + +comb. nov. males additionally have small exterior tibial lobes on the distal ends like are present in our + +Cryptophyllium drunganum + +comb. nov. male. Our male + +Cryptophyllium drunganum + +comb. nov. can however be differentiated from + +Cryptophyllium tibetense + +comb. nov. by the presence of eight or nine small serrate teeth present throughout the full length of the profemoral exterior lobe vs. + +Cryptophyllium tibetense + +comb. nov. males which only have two or three small teeth on the distal end only. Additionally, the mesofemoral exterior lobe also can differentiate these species as it is distinctly angled in our + +Cryptophyllium drunganum + +comb. nov. male and smoothly arcing without a distinct bend in + +Cryptophyllium tibetense + +comb. nov. males. + + + +Cryptophyllium yunnanense + +comb. nov. can be differentiated by the absence of exterior tibial lobes and the lack of a distinctly serrate exterior profemoral lobe margin, with + +Cryptophyllium yunnanense + +comb. nov. only having two or three small teeth vs. our male + +Cryptophyllium drunganum + +comb. nov. which has eight or nine small serrate teeth present throughout the full length of the profemoral exterior lobe. + + + +Distribution. + +At present only known from northern Yunnan Province, from the type locality of Nujian Lisu Autonomous Prefecture, Gongshan County (Drung-Nu), and our tentative male + +Cryptophyllium drunganum + +comb. nov. from Du Longjiang Township, Qing Lang Dang in the same prefecture. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/ED/67/37ED67BFE2E15FCA9651BA45773777ED.xml b/data/37/ED/67/37ED67BFE2E15FCA9651BA45773777ED.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..43f24baed8e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/ED/67/37ED67BFE2E15FCA9651BA45773777ED.xml @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + +A checklist of vascular plants of the W National Park in Burkina Faso, including the adjacent hunting zones of Tapoa-Djerma and Kondio + + + +Author + +Nacoulma, Blandine M. I. +Universite Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso + + + +Author + +Schmidt, Marco +Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt am Main, Germany & Palmengarten, Frankfurt am Main, Germany +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6087-6117 +mschmidt@senckenberg.de + + + +Author + +Hahn, Karen +Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany + + + +Author + +Thiombiano, Adjima +Universite Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2020 + +8 + + +54205 +54205 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e54205 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e54205 +1314-2828-8-e54205 +AC04300B71A5532C90F2702393102067 + + + + +Saba senegalensis (A.DC.) Pichon + + + +Distribution +Sudanian + + +Notes +Life Form: phanerophyte; Voucher: Schmidt et al. (FR-0007685) + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/ED/B4/37EDB4139F25D96E74628B88DFEDE464.xml b/data/37/ED/B4/37EDB4139F25D96E74628B88DFEDE464.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..135d116c6ec --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/ED/B4/37EDB4139F25D96E74628B88DFEDE464.xml @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ + + + +Review of the genus Leptopilina (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Figitidae, Eucoilinae) from the Eastern United States, including three newly described species + + + +Author + +Lue, Chia-Hua +Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop circle, Baltimore, MD 21042, USA & Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS / USDA c / o Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10 th & Constitution Ave, NW, Washington DC 20560, USA +chiachia926@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Driskell, Amy C. +Laboratories of Analytical Biology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10 th & Constitution Ave, NW, Washington DC 20560, USA + + + +Author + +Leips, Jeff +Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop circle, Baltimore, MD 21042, USA + + + +Author + +Buffington, Matthew L. +Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS / USDA c / o Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10 th & Constitution Ave, NW, Washington DC 20560, USA + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2016 + +2016-12-19 + + +53 + + +35 +76 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.53.10369 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.53.10369 +1314-2607-53-35 +C543496584B2445C9F11DE63DD74F6DA +FFA7FF9A7E57ED63FFE8FFF5EE69FFA3 +575136 + + + + +Leptopilina heterotoma (Thomson, 1862) + + + + +Eucoila heterotoma +Thomson, 1862: 403 (original description); Nordlander, 1978: 50 (lectotype designation). + + +Ganaspis subnuda +Kieffer, 1904: 64 (original description); Forshage, Nordlander & Buffington, 2013: 233 (junior synonym of +Leptopilina heterotoma +(Thomson), type information). + + +Ganaspis monilicornis +Kieffer, 1905: 623 (original description); Weld, 1952: 228 (junior synonym of +Ganaspis musti +). + + +Erisphagia philippinensis +Kieffer, 1916: 282 (original description). + + +Pseudeucoila (Pseudeucoila) bochei +Weld, 1944: 65-66 (original description). + + +Cothonaspis (Erisphagia) philippinensis +(Kieffer): Weld, 1952: 244 (generic transfer). + + +Pseudeucoila bochei +Weld: +Nostvik +, 1954: 142 (description of early developmental stages); Forshage, Nordlander & Buffington, 2013: 233 (junior synonym of +Leptopilina heterotoma +(Thomson), type information). + + +Leptopilina monilicornis +(Kieffer): Nordlander, 1980: 430 (removed from synonymy with +Ganaspis musti +and entered into synonymy with +Leptopilina heterotoma +). + + +Leptopilina philippinensis +(Kieffer): Nordlander, 1980: 430 (junior synonym of +Leptopilina heterotoma +, lectotype designation). + + +Leptopilina subnuda +(Kieffer): Nordlander, 1980: 430 (junior synonym of +Leptopilina heterotoma +). + + +Leptopilina bochei +(Weld): Nordlander, 1980: 431 (junior synonym of +Leptopilina heterotoma +). + + +Leptopilina heterotoma +(Thomson): Nordlander, 1980: 430 (generic transfer); +Paretas-Martinez +, Forshage, Buffington, Fisher, La Salle & Pujade-Villar, 2013: 80 (new distribution record for Australia, listed); Forshage, Nordlander & Buffington, 2013: 233 (cataloged, type information, synonymy); Ward, 2014: 575 (keyed); van Noort, Buffington & Forshage, 2015: 92 (listed). + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Leptopilina heterotoma + +(Figs +40-41 +) is immediately distinguishable from other + +Leptopilina + +by their large and rhombus shaped scutellar plate (Fig. +17 +); other species have a smaller scutellar plate that is shaped like a tear drop (Fig. +20 +), and exposing at least half of the scutellum (in dorsal view). + + + +Figure 40-41. + +Leptopilina heterotoma + +. + + + + +Redescription. + +Coloration with head, mesosoma, metasoma black to dark brown, legs light brown. Malar sulcus present. Apical segment of maxillary palp 1-1.5 times as long as preceding segment. Terminal flagellomere with two basiconic sensillae. Basiconic sensillae present on F6-F11. Placoidal sensilla present on F6-F11. Number of ridges on pronotal plate in lateral view 3. Sculpture on mesoscutum absent, entire surface smooth, shiny. Parascutal carina curved mesally. Dorsal surface of scutellum areolet - rugulose. Circumscutellar carina present, incomplete, laterally delimiting dorsal and ventral halves of scutellum, not present posteriorly. Latero-ventral margin of scutellum posterior to axillula smooth ventrally, weakly rugulose dorsally. Dorsal part of scutellum entirely rugose. Scutellar plate, in dorsal view, large, rhombus shape, covering most of scutellum. Posterior impression of metepimeron absent. Anterior impression of metepisternum, immediately beneath anterior end of metapleural carina, present, small and narrow. Wing vein M absent. Inter propodeal carinae space setose, too dense to see underlying surface. Horizontal carina running anteriorly from lateral propodeal carina not visible, setae too dense. Surface of petiole longitudinally costate +laterally +, shagreen dorsally. Setal band (hairy ring) at base of tergum 3 present, interrupted dorsally, ventrally, dense hair. + + + +Distribution in Eastern North America. +Maryland and Virginia. [http://hol.osu.edu/map-full.html?id=323709] + + +Material examined. + + +United States +. MD, +Baltimore Co. +, +39.668081°N +76.578860°W +, +White Hall Site +, +17.VI.2012 +, +bait trap +, +C.-H. Lue +( +5 females +, USNMENT00917851, 00917918, 00917956, 00917980, 00917998 (USNM)). MD, +Baltimore Co. +, +39.668081°N +76.578860°W +, +White Hall Site +, +19.VI.2012 +, +bait trap +, +C.-H. Lue +( +1 female +, USNMENT00917991 (USNM)). MD, +Baltimore Co. +, +39.668081°N +76.578860°W +, +White Hall Site +, +19.VI.2012 +, +yellow pan trap +, +C.-H. Lue +( +2 females +, USNMENT01022188, 01022240 (USNM)). MD, +Baltimore Co. +, +39.668081°N +76.578860°W +, +White Hall Site +, +20.VI-23.VI.2012 +, +bait trap +, +C.-H. Lue +( +3 females +, USNMENT00917909-00917910, 00917941 (USNM)). VA, +Arlington Co. +, +Maywood +, +20.XI.1921 +, +W. L. McAtee +( +4 females +, USNMENT01197507, 01197511, 01197525, 01197536 (USNM)) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EE/11/37EE11941FB635A460FD2432C88AB2A1.xml b/data/37/EE/11/37EE11941FB635A460FD2432C88AB2A1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dd0d0b73429 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EE/11/37EE11941FB635A460FD2432C88AB2A1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ + + + +New records and detailed distribution and abundance of selected arthropod species collected between 1999 and 2011 in Azorean native forests + + + +Author + +Borges, Paulo A. V. + + + +Author + +Gaspar, Clara + + + +Author + +Crespo, Luis Carlos Fonseca + + + +Author + +Rigal, Francois + + + +Author + +Cardoso, Pedro + + + +Author + +Pereira, Fernando + + + +Author + +Rego, Carla + + + +Author + +Amorim, Isabel R. + + + +Author + +Melo, Catarina + + + +Author + +Aguiar, Carlos + + + +Author + +Andre, Genage + + + +Author + +Mendonca, Enesima P. + + + +Author + +Ribeiro, Servio + + + +Author + +Hortal, Joaquin + + + +Author + +Santos, Ana M. C. + + + +Author + +Barcelos, Luis + + + +Author + +Enghoff, Henrik + + + +Author + +Mahnert, Volker + + + +Author + +Pita, Margarida T. + + + +Author + +Ribes, Jordi + + + +Author + +Baz, Arturo + + + +Author + +Sousa, Antonio B. + + + +Author + +Vieira, Virgilio + + + +Author + +Wunderlich, Joerg + + + +Author + +Parmakelis, Aristeidis + + + +Author + +Whittaker, Robert J. + + + +Author + +Quartau, Jose Alberto + + + +Author + +Serrano, Artur R. M. + + + +Author + +Triantis, Kostas A. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +10948 +10948 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10948 +1314-2828--10948 + + + + +Euborellia annulipes (Lucas, 1847) + + + +Ecological interactions + +Native status +Introduced + + + +Distribution +COR; FLO; FAI; PIC; GRA; SJG; TER; SMG; SMR + + +Notes +Also present: MAD; CAN; CVP (Biogeographical Realm: Cosmopolitan) + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EE/1B/37EE1B789C91729625EF9329592EDD45.xml b/data/37/EE/1B/37EE1B789C91729625EF9329592EDD45.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2b93a8c2828 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EE/1B/37EE1B789C91729625EF9329592EDD45.xml @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828--9042 + + + + +Odontocolon dentipes (Gmelin, 1790) + + + + +Ichneumon dentipes +Gmelin, 1790 + + +femoratum +(Olivier, 1811, +Ophion +) + + +pinetorum +(Thomson, 1877, +Odontomerus +) + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EE/A7/37EEA704D3225F2386352A603EF22770.xml b/data/37/EE/A7/37EEA704D3225F2386352A603EF22770.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9c41f5fc713 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EE/A7/37EEA704D3225F2386352A603EF22770.xml @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + +Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part S) + + + +Author + +Jarvis, Charlie +Department of Botany, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK + +text + + +2007 +Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum + +London + + + +Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types + + + +806 +877 + + + +book chapter +https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 +978-0-9506207-7-0 +291971 + + + + + + + +Secale villosum +Linnaeus + +, + +Species Plantarum +1 + +: 84. 1753 + + +. + + + +"Habitat in Europa australi, & in oriente." RCN: 707. + + + +Lectotype +(Turland in Cafferty & al. in +Taxon +49: 257. 2000): [icon] +"Gramen Creticum spicatum, secalinum, glumis ciliaribus" +in Buxbaum, Pl. Minus Cognit. Cent. 5: 21, t. 41. 1740. - +Epitype +(Turland in Cafferty & al. in +Taxon +49: 257. 2000): Greece. Crete, Ep. Agios vasilios: between Plakias & Lefkogia, 50m, 12 Apr 1990, +Turland 157 +(BM-000576283). + + + + +Current name: + + +Dasypyrum villosum + +(L.) P. Candargy + +( +Poaceae +). + + + + +Note: +Frederiksen (in +Nordic J. Bot. +11: 139. 1991) designated + +Herb. Tournefort No. 4943 ( +P +) + +as a +neotype +for this name, wrongly excluding as ineligible for lectotypification cited plates from Parkinson and Buxbaum. Turland therefore rejected +Frederiksen's +neotypification, designating a +lectotype +along with a supporting +epitype +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EF/18/37EF1812B74C55C0677CB82143EDCBAB.xml b/data/37/EF/18/37EF1812B74C55C0677CB82143EDCBAB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..19e3034bba1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EF/18/37EF1812B74C55C0677CB82143EDCBAB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,364 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Amaranthaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/amaranthaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Blitum capitatum +L. + + + + + + +Aehriger +Erdbeerspinat + + + + + +Art ISFS: 62600 Checklist: 1006880 +Amaranthaceae +Blitum +Blitum capitatum L. + + +Zusammenfassung + + + + +Artbeschreibung + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: +Aehnlich +wie + +B. virgatum + +, aber + +Staengel +oben blattlos + +, +Blaetter +wenig tief +gezaehnt +, die obersten breit-lanzettlich und +/- ganzrandig, die beerenartige Sammelfrucht +5-10 mm +dick. + + + + +Bluetezeit + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: 6-7 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: +Schuttplaetze +, +Wegraender +/ kollin-montan / Sehr vereinzelt und nur adventiv + + + + +Verbreitung global + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: Herkunft ungewiss + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte + +(nach +Landolt & al. 2010 +) + +2 + 35-44 + 4.t.2n=18 + + + + + +Oekologie + + +Lebensform Therophyt + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + +KEINE ANGABE + + +
+
+ + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl L--Salzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl T--
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +--
+ + + + +Nomenklatur + + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Blitum capitatum +L. + + + + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: + +Aehriger +Erdbeerspinat + +Nom +francais +: + +Epinard fraise en +tete + +Nome italiano: +Farinello capitato + + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Blitum capitatum L. + + +Checklist 2017 + +62600
= +Blitum capitatum L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2001 + +292
= +Blitum capitatum L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2012 + +1122
= +Blitum capitatum L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2018 + +1122
= +Blitum capitatum L. + + +Index synonymique 1996 + +62600
= +Blitum capitatum L. + + +SISF/ISFS 2 + +62600
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Status Indigenat +: Neophyt: nach der Entdeckung von Amerika in der Region aufgetreten (nach 1500) + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EF/39/37EF39D808F55F4B902FFDCD56423765.xml b/data/37/EF/39/37EF39D808F55F4B902FFDCD56423765.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7421a36d7fa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EF/39/37EF39D808F55F4B902FFDCD56423765.xml @@ -0,0 +1,348 @@ + + + +Four new species of troglomorphic Coecobrya Yosii, 1956 (Collembola, Entomobryidae) from Thailand based on morphological and molecular evidence, with an updated key of Thai troglomorphic species + + + +Author + +Nilsai 1, Areeruk +Division of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand + + + +Author + +Detcharoen 1, Matsapume +Division of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand + + + +Author + +Godeiro 2, Nerivania Nunes +Division of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand + + + +Author + +Jantarit 3, Sopark +Division of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand + +text + + +Subterranean Biology + + +2021 + +2021-12-10 + + +41 + + +1 +42 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.41.76926 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.41.76926 +1314-2615-41-1 +73326F5CC4BE431DBE6D601A69BD7FFA +482986A3D1D15408B0FE4F5EF7587312 + + + + +Coecobrya phitsanulokensis Jantarit & Nilsai +sp. nov. + + + + +Figures 1D +, 11 +, 12 +, 13 + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +: female on slide. Thailand, Phitsanulok province, Noen Mapang district, Tham Yai Nakarat, altitude 85 m a.m.s.l., +16.5052°N +, +100.6864°E +. 7.X.2019; S. Jantarit, A. Nilsai, K. Sarakhamhaeng and K. Jantapaso leg. (sample # THA_SJ_PLK01), dark zone of a cave, by entomological aspirator. +Paratypes +: same data as holotype, 7 specimens (3 females and 4 subadults on slides). +Additional material +: same data as holotype, 13 specimens (in ethanol) + +Holotype and seven paratypes on slides deposited in NHM-PSU. + + +Description. + +Habitus +(Fig. +1D +). Medium size +Entomobryidae +. Body length 1.8-2.3 mm (holotype 1.8 mm). No scales. Eyes absent. Color: whitish in alcohol, without pigmentation. Four antennal segments. Body slender not bent nor humped at the level of Th. II. Th. II slightly larger than Th. III. Abd. IV 3.58-3.88 times as long as Abd. III along the dorsal midline. + + +Pseudopores +(Figs +12H +, +13A, B, D +). Pseudopores present as round flat disks, smaller than mac sockets, except for the coxae and manubrium where psp are as large as mac sockets, present on various parts of the body: antennae, head, tergites, coxae and manubrium. On antennae, psp located ventro-apically between the tip of antennal segments and the chaetae of the apical row, or just below the apical row of chaetae (2 psp on Ant. I, 2-3 psp on Ant. II, and 3 psp on Ant. III). On the head, 1-2 psp located externally on each peri-antennal area. On tergites, 1+1 psp close to the axis from Th. II to Abd. IV (Figs +13A, B +, +13D +). On coxae, 1-2 psp on coxae I, 2-3 psp on coxae II and 1-2 psp on coxae III, located close to longitudinal rows of chaetae. On manubrium, 2+2 dorso-apical ones (Fig. +12H +). + + +Clypeus and mouthparts +(Figs +11A-C, F +, +12A +). Clypeal area with three long, smooth prefrontal chaetae; 9 middle chaetae (two long smooth chaetae, 7 small ciliated chaetae from mic to mes arranged asymmetrically), and two long, smooth lateral chaetae (Fig. +11A +). Prelabral and labral chaetae 4/5, 5, 4, all thin and smooth; three median chaetae of the first and second rows longer than the two lateral ones (32-38 vs. 12-15 +µm +) (Fig. +11C +). Distal border of the apical non-granulated area of the labrum with a relatively narrow median U- or V-form intrusion into the granulated area dorsally; apical edge without spines (Fig. +11C +). Ventro-distal complex of labrum well differentiated, asymmetrical, with 1+1 distal combs 15-16 minute on the right side and 13 strong and larger teeth on the left side, and an axial pair of long sinuous tubules. Maxillary outer lobe with one basal chaeta, one apical chaeta (basal chaeta thicker than apical one) and four smooth sublobal hairs (65-70 vs. 25-32 +µm +) (Fig. +11F +). Labial palp strongly modified for the genus, with 0, 5, 0, 4, 4 guards for papillae A-E. Lateral process of labial palp subcylindrical, as thick as normal chaetae, with tip beyond the apex of the labial papilla (Fig. +11B +). Mandible apex blunt and strong, asymmetrical (left with four teeth, right with five teeth); molar plate with three strong pointed basal teeth, and 3-(5) smaller inner distal teeth, identical in both mandibles (Fig. +12A +). Maxilla capitulum with a three-toothed claw and several stout ciliated lamellae; lamella 2 large and broad, lamella 3 well developed; several other lamellae present. + + + +Figure 11. + +Coecobrya phitsanulokensis + +sp. nov. +A +Clypeal chaetae +B +Labial palp +C +Prelabral and labral chaetae +D +Anterior side of ventral tube +E +Dorsal cephalic chaetotaxy +F +Outer maxillary lobe. + + + + +Figure 12. + +Coecobrya phitsanulokensis + +sp. nov., continued +A +Mandibles +B +Distal part of tita III and claw complex +C +Distal part of manubrium ventrally +D +Trochanteral organ +E +Anterior side of ventral tube +F +Posterior side of ventral tube and Lateral flap +G +Mucro +H +Manubrium plaque. + + + + +Figure 13. + +Coecobrya phitsanulokensis + +sp. nov., continued +A +Chaetotaxy of dorsal Th. II- III +B +Chaetotaxy of dorsal Abd. I- III +C +Chaetotaxy of dorsal Abd. V +D +Chaetotaxy of dorsal Abd. IV. + + + +Antennae. +Antennae long, approximately 3.1-4.2 times as long as cephalic diagonal. Antennal segments ratio as I: II: III: IV. 1: 0.5-0.73: 0.48-0.7: 0.41-0.68 (N = 6). Antennal segments not subdivided nor annulated. Antennal chaetal types not analyzed in detail. Ant. I ventrally with many smooth spiny mic of various sizes in its basal part, many subcylindrical, hyaline sens in its middle to apical part, and many long smooth straight chaetae. The paddle-like chaetae on Ant II absent. Ant. III organ with five sens not clearly seen in all specimens. Ant. IV without apical bulb. Subapical organite not distinctly knobbed, swollen, slightly enlarged apically, inserted dorsally. + + +Dorsal head chaetotaxy +(Fig. +11E +). Dorsal cephalic chaetotaxy with five antennal chaetae (An1-3, An3a2, An3a, An1 as mes), four anterior mac (A0, A2-3 and A5) three median (M1, M2 and M4) and eight sutural mac (S0, S1-S7); Gr. II with 4 or 5 mac; A0 as mac; 5-7+5-7 scale-like structures present below sutural mac, probably inside the integument; a pair of short cephalic trichobothria, external and close to the middle of the head (Fig. +11E +). + + +Ventral head chaetotaxy +(Fig. +11D +). Chaetae of labial basis all smooth (m1m2rel1l2), (mimrel1l2 sensu Zhang and Pan, 2020), chaetae m1(mi), e and l1 subequal, r thin and shortest, and l2 longest, m2 longer and thicker than m1. The ratio of r to m2: 0.13-0.19 (Fig. +11D +). Postlabial chaetae X2, X and X4 minute chaetae, X1 and X3 absent. On each side of cephalic groove with 8-11 chaetae, of which the anterior five always long and smooth, others either smooth or finely ciliated, at least 3-4 minute chaetae always present on the posterior ones (Fig. +11D +). + + +Tergite chaetotaxy +(Figs +13A-D +). Th. II with three (m1, m2, m2i) medio-medial, three (m4, m4p, m4i) medio-sublateral and 31-33 posterior mac; 1+1 ms and 2+2 sens antero-laterally (Fig. +13A +). + + +Th. III with 32-33 mac. 2+2 sens laterally (Fig. +13A +). + + +Abd. I with seven (a2-3, m4, m2-3, m2i, m4p) mac, 1+1 ms and 1+1 sens laterally (Fig. +13B +). + + +Abd. II with 3(4) (a2, m3, m3ep, and m3e sometimes present) central and one (m5) lateral mac. 2+2 tric without modified chaetae, 1+1 sens laterally and 1+1 mic near internal tric (Fig. +13B +). + + +Abd. III with two (a2, m3) central and three (am6, pm6, p6) lateral mac, 3+3 tric without modified chaetae, 1+1 sens laterally,1+1 mic near m3, ms present (Fig. +13B +). + + +Abd. IV with nine central mac (I, M, A4-6, A5p, B4-6) and nine (D3, E1-4, E2p, F1-3) lateral mac, 2+2 tric and about 8 long S-like chaetae, without modified chaetae (Fig. +13D +). + + +Abd. V with 12 obvious mac mixed with several mes to small mac, and 3+3 sens (Fig. +13C +). Abd. VI not analysed. + + +S-chaetae formula from Th. II to Abd. V: 2+ms, 2/1+ms,2,2+ms, ≈8, 3; as and ps sens on Abd. IV 1/3 as long as S-like chaetae (Figs +13A-D +). + + +Legs +(Figs +12B, D +). Leg long; tita of leg III slightly longer than tita of legs I and II. Legs devoid of scales, covered with ordinary ciliated chaetae of various lengths, mic not seen. Trochanteral organ with 19 smooth, straight, unequal spine-like chaetae (Fig. +12D +). The distal whorl of tita III with 10 subequal ciliated mes, irregularly arranged, and dorso-apical pointed tenent hair. A smooth, thin and long chaeta close to tenent hair absent. Ventro-distal smooth chaeta of tita III thick, erected, pointed, rather short. Claw slender and elongated. Unguis of all claws without inner tooth, and a pair of subequal basal teeth at about 29-36 % of inner edge from basis. Unguiculus approximately 1/2 as long as the inner edge of the claw, rather swollen basally, pointed apically, devoid of inner tooth, with at least 3-4 minute outer teeth, often inconspicuous, at 3/4 of its length (Fig. +12B +) + + +Ventral tube +(Figs +12E, F +). Ventral tube about four times longer than wide. Lateral flaps with 6-8+6-8 smooth chaetae (Fig. +12F +). Anterior face with 6-7+6-7 ciliated chaetae, four of them larger than others (Fig. +12E +); posterior face with 4 long, smooth apical chaetae and about 11 smooth chaetae arranged roughly asymmetrically, mixed with mic or small acuminate mes (Fig. +12F +). + + +Furcal complex +(Figs +12C, G, H +). Tenaculum with four large teeth of decreasing size from the basal to the distal one of each ramus, on a prominent, irregular body, with a postero-basal strong serrated chaeta bent distally. Mucrodens 1.11-2.27 times longer than manubrium. Furcula without smooth chaetae. Manubrium with a dense cover of ciliated chaetae both dorsally and ventrally. Manubrial plaque with 2+2 psp and five to six ciliate chaetae (Fig. +12H +). Distal part of manubrium ventrally with 13-15+13-15 ciliate chaetae (Fig. +12C +). Dens without spines, annulated and covered with ciliated chaetae on both sides. Distal smooth part of dens slightly longer than mucro. Mucro strong and falcate, basal spine long, nearly reaching the tip of the mucronal tooth (Fig. +12G +). + + +Genital plate +. Female genital plate with 2+2 genital mic. + + + +Ecology. + + +Coecobrya phitsanulokensis + +sp. nov. was found from the twilight zone (ca. 20 m from the cave entrance) to the dark zone of the cave on wet and muddy ground and on the decaying organic material inside the cave. The length of the main passage in the cave is about 300 m. The temperature was 26.2-27.9 °C, the soil temperature was 24.1-24.3 °C and the relative humidity in the cave was 78-89 %. The cave has a seasonal stream in it, but there was no water during our visit. This cave is developed in a very small isolated limestone hill (0.4 +x +0.9 km) surrounded by a flood plain agricultural landscape, with at least seven other caves having been reported in this hill. + + + +Etymology. +This species is named after the type locality, Phitsanulok province, where the material was collected. + + +Remarks. + +Among the troglobitic + +Coecobrya + +species + +C. phitsanulokensis + +sp. nov. is similar to + +C. ellisi + +sp. nov. from Tham Tho, Nong Phai district, Phetchabun province. For the species diagnosis see the remarks under + +Coecobrya ellisi + +sp. nov. and Table +1 +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EF/81/37EF81C30584098F7EF97243DEE921A4.xml b/data/37/EF/81/37EF81C30584098F7EF97243DEE921A4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fbab440eabf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EF/81/37EF81C30584098F7EF97243DEE921A4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ + + + +The smallest known species of Afrotropical Scolytoplatypus Schaufuss (Curculionidae, Scolytinae) - with unique features and an isolated phylogenetic position + + + +Author + +Jordal, Bjarte H. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2018 + +749 + + +125 +130 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.749.24199 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.749.24199 +1313-2970-749-125 +2E65BDD679F34C819B941BBD1356B53D +2E65BDD679F34C819B941BBD1356B53D + + + + +Scolytoplatypus unipilus Jordal +sp. n. +Figs 1-4 + + + +Type material examined. +Holotype, female: Gabon: Ivindo National Park, Ipassa, 6 km W. Makokou. GIS: 0.512, 12.802, #23 vittatol trap. Paratypes (2): same data as holotype, except one taken from Ipsenol trap. The holotype and two paratypes (" ZMBN/ENTScol4942 - ZMBN/ENTScol4944") are deposited in the University Museum of Bergen (ZMBN). + + +Diagnosis, female. + +Typical female +Scolytoplatypus +with broad protibiae with transverse rows of granules and rugae, an anteromedian mycangial pore on pronotum, and a depressed triangular scutellum. Distinguished from all species in the genus by the unusually long antennal club, further from all African and Malagasy species by the small size (1.7 vs.>2.3 mm), the lack of striae on elytral declivity (and disk), by the undivided, simple setae on the metanepisternum, and the rounded hind corners of the pronotum. + + + +Figures 1-4. Habitus, head and elytral declivity of +Scolytoplatypus unipilus +sp. n. + + + + +Description, female. + +Length 1.6-1.7 mm, 2.0 +x +longer than wide; colour dark brown to black, ventral side and legs brown. + + +Head. Eyes separated above by 3.9 +x +their width. Frons generally convex, slightly flattened on upper half, rounded below, with a transverse, broad, impression just above epistoma; surface smooth and shiny on lower half, reticulated and dull above, with small shallow punctures separated by 2-4 +x +their diameter. Vestiture consisting of scattered, short, fine setae mainly in reticulated area on upper half. Antennal club 3 +x +longer than funicle, densely covered by very short scale-like setae and fewer and much longer fine setae. Funiculus 5-segmented. + + +Pronotum 0.9 +x +as long as wide, sides subparallel on anterior half, constricted on posterior half, 0.9 +x +as wide as anterior part; surface finely reticulated with shallow punctures spaced by 1-2 +x +their diameter; pronotal vestiture consisting of fine short setae arising from punctures, a few longer setae scattered close to anterior margin. Mycangial pore slightly elliptical, with long yellow setae emerging, center of pore located on anterior fifth. + + +Elytra 1.1 +x +longer than wide, 1.3-1.4 +x +longer than pronotum; basal area notched for depressed triangular scutellum; sides of elytra straight, broadly rounded behind; striae not indicated, punctures confused, spaced on disc by 1-2 +x +their diameter; declivity finely rugose, strongly reticulated. Interstriae 10 weakly elevated to level of ventrite 1. Vestiture consisting of minute setae on declivity. + +Legs. Procoxae separated by width of antennal club. Mesocoxae separated by width of a mesocoxa. Protibial shape typical for genus. +Ventral vestiture. Metanepisternum with relatively few, fine, simple setae. + + +Male. +Not known. + + +Molecular data. + +Phylogenetic analysis based on four genes resulted in a fully resolved tree topology (Fig. 5). Different partition schemes and model selection had no influence on tree topology. +Scolytoplatypus unipilus +formed a maximally supported sister lineage to all other African and Malagasy species in the genus, and yet clearly separate from the Asian species. GeneBank accession numbers: COI, MG979488; EF1a, MG979489; CAD, MG979490; 28S, MG980072. + + +Figure 5. Tree topology (excluding outgroups) resulting from all Bayesian analyses (PSRF = 1.0, sd = 0.003) and the parsimony analysis (L = 3503, CI = 0.48, RI = 0.54), of four gene fragments. + + + +Etymology. +The Latin name unipilus is composed of the masculine adjective unus in its form uni-, meaning one, and the masculine noun pilus, meaning hair, referring to the simple, single, hair-like setae on the metanepisternum and metasternum. + + +Distribution and biology. +Only known from the type locality in Gabon. All specimens were collected in black flight intercept traps baited with vittatol (3) or ipsenol (1) lures. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EF/9F/37EF9F9C2DE408AA9B47392FB3DE32CC.xml b/data/37/EF/9F/37EF9F9C2DE408AA9B47392FB3DE32CC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a2fb03e25f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EF/9F/37EF9F9C2DE408AA9B47392FB3DE32CC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - aculeates (Apoidea, Chrysidoidea and Vespoidea) + + + +Author + +Else, George R. + + + +Author + +Bolton, Barry + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8050 +8050 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8050 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8050 +1314-2828-4-8050 + + + + +Cryptocheilus Panzer, 1806 + + + + +CALICURGUS +Brulle +, 1833 + + +CHLOROCHEILUS +Wolf, 1965 + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/EF/BB/37EFBB7829C4B8D678FE64877772DA30.xml b/data/37/EF/BB/37EFBB7829C4B8D678FE64877772DA30.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b79af72abd1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/EF/BB/37EFBB7829C4B8D678FE64877772DA30.xml @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ + + + +Taxonomic revision and cladistic analysis of Avicularia Lamarck, 1818 (Araneae, Theraphosidae, Aviculariinae) with description of three new aviculariine genera 01 + + + +Author + +Fukushima, Caroline Sayuri + + + +Author + +Bertani, Rogerio + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +659 + + +1 +185 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.659.10717 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.659.10717 +1313-2970-659-1 +79A6393D802141B8BF1A2A3723AFECFB + + + + +Ybyrapora diversipes (C. L. Koch, 1842) +comb. n. +Figs 256, 259, 276-283, 319 + + + + + +Mygale +diversipes + +C. L. Koch, 1841: 65, pl. CCCX, fig. 731 (lectotype female, Brazil, Bahia, Freir. leg., ZMB 2943, examined). + + +Eurypelma diversipes +: C. L. +Koch 1850 +: 73; +Simon 1864 +: 67, +1892 +: 172; +Ausserer 1871 +: 202; +Roewer 1942 +: 239; +Bonnet 1955 +: 1831; +1957 +: 2990. + + +Avicularia diversipes +: F. O. +Pickard-Cambridge 1896 +: 744; +Bertani and Fukushima 2009 +: 26 (figs 1-4, 13-15, 17, Appendix I, figs A1-A6); Bertani 2102: 5, 79; 80, 88; +World Spider Catalog 2016 +. + + + +Diagnosis + +(amended from +Bertani and Fukushima 2009 +). Females differ from those of +Ybyrapora sooretama +comb. n. and +Ybyrapora gamba +comb. n. by presenting very long, strongly curved outwards spermathecae with its distal portion almost reaching the spermathecae base (Fig. 259). Males differ from those of +Ybyrapora gamba +sp. comb. n. and +Ybyrapora sooretama +comb. n. by having embolus more than four times +tegulum's +length, with strong curvature in frontal view (Fig. 278) and cymbium with well-developed process bearing thick setae on retrolateral lobe (Fig. 280). + + + +Figures 276-283. +Ybyrapora diversipes +(C. L. Koch, 1842) comb. n., male (IBSP 119271). 276-279 left palpal bulb 276 prolateral 277 retrolateral 278 frontal 279 dorsal 280 left cymbium, dorsal 281-283 left tibia I 281 prolateral 282 ventral 283 retrolateral. Scale bars = 1 mm. + + + + +Material examined. + +Female, Brazil, state of Bahia, +Ilheus +, CEPLAC [ +14°46'S +, +39°13'W +], R. Bertani & G. Puorto col., March 1991 (IBSP 11754); male, same locality, collectors and date (IBSP 119271 ref. 64.583). + + + +Diagnosis, other material examined, description, color pattern ontogeny, distribution and natural history. + +See +Bertani and Fukushima (2009) +. + + + +Complementary description. + +Male: Palp (Figs 276-279): globous bulb with small subtegulum, lacking prominence on tegulum. Embolus: not flattened, lacking keels, 7.76 long in retrolateral view, about 7 times +tegulum's +length. Medial portion and +tegulum's +margin form very acute angle in retrolateral view. Proximal part very curved in frontal view; thin distal width, tapering distally; basal, middle, and distal width of 1.05, 0.35, 0.08 respectively. Tegulum: 1.89 long, 1.08 high. (Fig. 319). Cymbium subtriangular with subequal lobes, with a well-developed rounded process on retrolateral lobe, bearing thick setae (Fig. 280). + +Tibia I with discrete elevation covered by a cluster of setae in apical portion, on prolateral side (Figs 281-283). +Type II urticating setae: 0.791-0.860 long; 0.017-0.020 wide in male; 0.427-0.520 long; 0.012-0.016 wide in female. +Female: Spermathecae (Fig. 259): two completely separated, not-twisted very long spermathecae, with walls lacking lobes and accentuated outwards curvature medially. Spermatheca midwidth as wide as its base width, virtually non-sclerotized. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F0/08/37F008EBBFD9575294A27E35B72659A7.xml b/data/37/F0/08/37F008EBBFD9575294A27E35B72659A7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a1959d17f5e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F0/08/37F008EBBFD9575294A27E35B72659A7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ + + + +Caribbean Amphipoda (Crustacea) of Panama. Part II: parvorder Hadziidira + + + +Author + +White, Kristine N. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-1656 +Georgia College & State University, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Aquatic Sciences Center, Milledgeville, GA 31061, USA +kristine.white@gcsu.edu + + + +Author + +Sir, Sally J. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-1192 +Georgia College & State University, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Aquatic Sciences Center, Milledgeville, GA 31061, USA + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2024 + +2024-03-18 + + +1195 + + +249 +296 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1195.116721 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1195.116721 +1313-2970-1195-249 +4868E773FA184196B2075A691987CC8C +AD46D7C8FCCB5CB4AD7A21EC55516779 + + + + +Quadrimaera sarae Krapp-Schickel & Ruffo, 2000 + + + + +Figs 15 +, 29A + + + + +Quadrimaera sarae +Krapp-Schickel & Ruffo, 2000: 206-213, figs 8-10. + + + +Material examined. + + +Panama +• +4-5 mm +• +2 ♂ +, +2 ♀ +; +Bocas del Toro +, +Swan Cay +; +9.453333°N +, +82.298333°W +; depth + +2-3 m + +; among coral rubble; +4 Aug 2005 +; +S. DeGrave +leg.; GCRL 6646 • +1 ♂ +; +Bocas del Toro +, +Drago +; +9.418056 N +, +82.3375°W +; depth + +3 m + +, among coral rubble; +9 Aug 2021 +; +K.N. White +leg.; USNM 1703529 + +. + + + +Diagnosis. +Antenna 1 accessory flagellum 7-articulate. Gnathopod 1 coxa anteroventrally produced; carpus elongate with slight dorsal depression and two short and three long facial setal rows. Gnathopod 2 propodus palmar margin with U-shaped excavation surrounded by one subquadrate and one quadrate projection, palm defined by small projection; dactylus medially expanded. Pereopods 3 and 4 dactyli simple; pereopods 5-7 dactyli bifid. Telson, lobes apically excavated, each with four long apical spines. + + +Distribution. + +Turks and Caicos, Fort George Cay; Mexico: +Yucatan +; Venezuela: Tobago Island ( +Krapp-Schickel and Ruffo 2000 +); Panama: Bocas del Toro (present study). + + + +Ecology and remarks. +These amphipods are associated with coral rubble at depths of 0.3-3 m. Panamanian specimens closely resemble previously described specimens, including the characteristic gnathopod 2 propodus palm, simple pereopods 3 and 4 dactyli, and bifid pereopods 5-7 dactyli, which are unique to this species. The excavation on the gnathopod 2 propodus is larger in our 4.2 mm male than shown in the holotype (4.7 mm male) and there are more than three spines on the pereopods 3 and 4 bases in Panamanian specimens, but given the striking similarity in every other character, we are considering this as a regional variation. + + +Figure 15. + +Quadrimaera sarae + +, male, 4.2 mm, gnathopod 1 propodus, carpus, dactylus medial, pereopod 3 dactylus, pereopod 5 dactylus, gnathopod 2 medial, coxa 1, telson. Scale bars: 0.5 mm. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F0/9A/37F09AED2D01B483CFE0CA4B62300178.xml b/data/37/F0/9A/37F09AED2D01B483CFE0CA4B62300178.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3929bcd5c1f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F0/9A/37F09AED2D01B483CFE0CA4B62300178.xml @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@ + + + +Taxonomic revision of the rock-dwelling door snail genus Montenegrina Boettger, 1877 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Clausiliidae) + + + +Author + +Feher, Zoltan + + + +Author + +Szekeres, Miklos + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +599 + + +1 +137 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.599.8168 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.599.8168 +1313-2970-599-1 +8BEE967F7C6946928210A440AD8E2018 + + + + +Taxon +classification Animalia Stylommatophora Clausiliidae + + + + +Montenegrina rugilabris rugilabris (Mousson, 1859) +Fig. 28A + + + + +Clausilia rugilabris +Mousson, 1859: 275-276. + + +Clausilia (Delima) rugilabris +- +Westerlund 1884 +: 53. + + +Delima (Albanodelima) rugilabris +- +Wagner 1924 +: 120. + + +Montenegrina rugilabris +- +Zilch 1981 +: 130, plate 14, fig. 34. - +Nordsieck 2009 +: 74. + + + +Diagnosis. +Shell medium, tumid, yellowish-brown. Lower whorls smooth, upper ones very finely, indistinctly costate. Neck not to weakly inflexed, finely and densely costate. Basal crest well recognizable, peripheral crest weak. Peristome attached, with strongly swollen, reflexed margin. Lamellae superior and spiralis overlap. In front view lamella inferior moderately emerged, broadly-bent subcolumellaris visible. Lunella dorsal, separate from the short basalis. Subclaustralis absent or residual. Anterior plica superior often connected to the lunella complex. Clausilium plate almost entirely visible through the aperture. + + +Dimensions +(in mm). Hs: 16.5-20.4, Ws: 5.1-6.3 (near Ligkiades junction HNHM 99549). + + +Figure 28. A +Montenegrina rugilabris rugilabris +(Mousson, 1859), syntype, SMF 176313 B +Montenegrina rugilabris golikutensis +ssp. n., holotype, NHMW 111214 C +Montenegrina rugilabris gregoi +ssp. n., holotype, HNHM 99474 D +Montenegrina rugilabris edmundi +Szekeres, 2006, HNHM 94850 E +Montenegrina rugilabris lambdaformis +Reischuetz +& Sattmann, 1990, holotype, NHMW 84367 F +Montenegrina rugilabris irmengardis +Klemm, 1962, paratype, SMF 165015 G +Montenegrina rugilabris welterschultesi +Feher +& Szekeres, 1999, holotype, HNHM 70840 H +Montenegrina soosi +Eross +& Szekeres, 2006, holotype, HNHM 94868 I +Montenegrina stankovici +( +Urbanski +, 1960), Sveti Naum, HNHM 90879 J +Montenegrina sporadica sporadica +Nordsieck, 1974, holotype, SMF 227678 K +Montenegrina sporadica tropojana +ssp. n., holotype, NHMW 111224. Scale bar: 5 mm. + + + + +Type locality. + +"Ianina" += Greece, Epirus, Ioannina. + + + +Type material. + +"Janina" +, ex Mousson, ex Schaefli, syntypes (SMF 176313/7); same locality, ex +Rossmaessler +, syntype (SMF 176314/1); same locality, ex Boettger, syntypes (SMF 176315/3), same locality, ex Jetschin, syntypes (SMF 94048/2); same locality, ex Shuttleworth, syntypes (NMBE 21042/6). + + + +Other material. + +Greece, Epirus, Mitsikeli Mts, N of Ligkiades, 1220 m, +39.7019°N +, +20.8946°E +, leg. JK, DM, Szederjesi, ZU, 4.v.2011 (HNHM 99546); Amfithea to Spothi road N of the Lake Pamvotis, 0.5 km E of the Ligkiades junction, 600 m, +39.6828°N +, +20.8887°E +, leg. ZE, ZF, JG, 24.vi.2014 (HNHM 99547); 1.5 km W of the Ligkiades junction, 530 m, +39.6895°N +, +20.8714°E +, leg. ZE, ZF, JG, 24.vi.2014 (HNHM 99548); 1 km W of the Ligkiades junction, 550 m, +39.6870°N +, +20.8740°E +, leg. ZE, ZF, JG, 24.vi.2014 (HNHM 99549); 0.5 km W of the Ligkiades junction, 570 m, +39.6849°N +, +20.8795°E +, leg. ZE, ZF, JG, 24.vi.2014 (HNHM 99550); near Restaurant Drabatova SE of Amfithea, 480 m, +39.6832°N +, +20.8779°E +, leg. AR, NR, PR, ix.2013 (NHMW 110430/MN/0034); Strouni, E of Perama, 480 m, +39.6860°N +, +20.8727°E +, leg. LP, PS, 30.vii.1976 (HNHM 31110); Lapsista near Ioannina, leg. Nordsieck, 21.viii.1971 (NHMW-K 65044) + + + +Distribution. + +Southwestern part and foothills of the Mitsikeli Mts, north of the Lake Pamvotis. Its range overlaps with that of +Montenegrina janinensis +(Fig. 29). + + + +Figure 29. Distribution of +Montenegrina rugilabris +. +Montenegrina rugilabris edmundi +(empty circle with dot); +Montenegrina rugilabris golikutensis +ssp. n. (triangle); +Montenegrina rugilabris gregoi +ssp. n. (empty triangle); +Montenegrina rugilabris irmengardis +(square); +Montenegrina rugilabris lambdaformis +(star); +Montenegrina rugilabris rugilabris +(circle); +Montenegrina rugilabris welterschultesi +(inverted triangle). + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F0/D6/37F0D67D8211DC34B580092670560438.xml b/data/37/F0/D6/37F0D67D8211DC34B580092670560438.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6d02f090dfd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F0/D6/37F0D67D8211DC34B580092670560438.xml @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@ + + + +Order Rodentia - Family Muridae + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2 + + + +1189 +1531 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316535 + + + + + +Mylomys rex +Thomas 1906 + + + + + + + +Mylomys rex +Thomas 1906 + +, +Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, 18: 304 + +. + + + + +Type Locality: + +C +Ethiopia +, Kaffa, Charada Forest. + + + + + +Vernacular Names: +Ethiopian Mylomys +. + + + + +Distribution: +Recorded only from the type locality. + + + + +Discussion: +The taxon + +rex + +, represented only by the +holotype +(a skin without skull), was described by + +Thomas (1906 +c +) + +as a species of + +Arvicanthis + +, but later "provisionally considered as a giant member of + +Desmomys + +" ( + +Thomas, 1916 +a +:68 + +). Dieterlen (1974) challenged the validity of + +rex + +, but +Yalden et al. (1976) +pointed out the features distinguishing the +holotype +from samples of + +D. harringtoni + +, and treated + +rex + +as another distinctive species endemic to +Ethiopia +. +Musser and Carleton (1993:630) +wrote that "Our study of the +holotype +skin reveals it to be a large and probably old adult of + +Mylomys + +that is not as brightly pigmented as most samples of that genus. Whether the +holotype +actually came from +Ethiopia +, or represents a separate species of + +Mylomys + +are unknown; we provisionally list + +rex + +in the synonymy of + +M. dybowskii + +." +Yalden et al. (1996) +were content to adopt this provisional arrangement, but explained there was no doubt the specimen was collected in S +Ethiopia +, and that it "may indeed be specifically distinct from + +M. dybowskii + +, since the latter is generally considered to be a savanna form while the type of + +rex + +was apparently obtained in tropical deciduous forest at an altitude of +1800 m +" and the speculation "that + +rex + +could be one of Ethiopia’s very few lowland forest endemics... may yet be proved correct, once further specimens become available." Lavrenchenko (2002) endorsed the possibility that + +rex + +may be a distinct species. We treat + +rex + +as a species, which is better than hiding a possible endemic in the synonymy of + +M. dybowskii + +; study of additional specimens will reveal its actual relationship to that widespread species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F0/DD/37F0DDAC8B6F5CDAB1251CCF8C092949.xml b/data/37/F0/DD/37F0DDAC8B6F5CDAB1251CCF8C092949.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..afbdcae7585 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F0/DD/37F0DDAC8B6F5CDAB1251CCF8C092949.xml @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + +Floristic inventory and distribution characteristics of algific talus slopes in a specific area of forest biodiversity in South Korea + + + +Author + +Lee, Jong-Won +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-8396 +Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Yun, Ho-Geun +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Hwang, Tae Young +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Kim, Kyungmin +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +Jung, Se-Hoon +Daoneco, Sejong-si, Republic of Korea + + + +Author + +An, Jong Bin +Korea National Arboretum, DMZ Forest Biological Conservation, Yanggu-gun, Republic of Korea +ajb8825@korea.kr + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2023 + +2023-12-18 + + +11 + + +113952 +113952 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.11.e113952 +1314-2828-11-e113952 +5B963235F71B550FA1E3BC1F0E590B10 + + + + +Lepidium apetalum Willd., 1800 + + + +Distribution +East Europe to Temperate Asia + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F1/08/37F108A1337C5CE98E081CB3254AD2EF.xml b/data/37/F1/08/37F108A1337C5CE98E081CB3254AD2EF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..994d42b0ae3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F1/08/37F108A1337C5CE98E081CB3254AD2EF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Checklist and distribution of Collembola from Greater Puerto Rico + + + +Author + +Ospina-Sanchez, Claudia Marcela +USDA-FS, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, San Juan, Puerto Rico +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8166-3193 +cmarcela.ospinas@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Soto-Adames, Felipe N +Florida Department of Agriculture, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America + + + +Author + +Gonzalez, Grizelle +USDA-FS, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, San Juan, Puerto Rico +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-5540 + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2020 + +8 + + +52054 +52054 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e52054 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e52054 +1314-2828-8-e52054 +CB8FEFEF602853358F6E2DA569FB5C60 + + + + +Isotomurus sp. 2 + + + +Distribution +Endemic; Puerto Rico: Luquillo. + + +Notes + +Reported by + +Ospina-Sanchez +2019 + +, new record. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F1/30/37F13019283C5495ACCCE7852A49F4DF.xml b/data/37/F1/30/37F13019283C5495ACCCE7852A49F4DF.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..370f72f2ee2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F1/30/37F13019283C5495ACCCE7852A49F4DF.xml @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ + + + +Revisiting the taxonomy of Dioclea and related genera (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae), with new generic circumscriptions + + + +Author + +Queiroz, Luciano Paganucci de +Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Botanica, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Av. Transnordestina s / n, Novo Horizonte, 44036 - 900, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil +luciano.paganucci@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Snak, Cristiane +Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Botanica, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Av. Transnordestina s / n, Novo Horizonte, 44036 - 900, Feira de Santana, BA, Brazil & Departamento de Engenharia de Pesca e Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Rua Cel. Fernandes Martins 270, Progresso, 88790 - 000, Laguna, Santa Catarina, Brazil + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2020 + +164 + + +67 +114 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.164.55441 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.164.55441 +1314-2003-164-67 +F8BB69882078557CB69041DA4DEAEA61 + + + + +4.1.34. +Macropsychanthus ucayalinus (Harms) L.P. Queiroz & Snak +comb. nov. + + + + +Basionym: +Dioclea ucayalina +Harms, Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 9: 262. 1925. Type: Peru, middle Ucayali, Yarina Cocha, +Tessmann 3464 +(holotype: B† [photo F! [F0BN002411]; lectotype, designated here from the isotypes: S! [S-R-9711]; isolectotypes: G! [00364004], NY! [00007748], US! [00004646]). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F1/55/37F155E6FB415C4FF7E009A10B80EFD2.xml b/data/37/F1/55/37F155E6FB415C4FF7E009A10B80EFD2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..da0511374b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F1/55/37F155E6FB415C4FF7E009A10B80EFD2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ + + + +Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas + + + +Author + +Linnaeus, Carolus + +text + +1753 +Laurentius Salvius + +Stockholm + + + +https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669 + +book +10.5281/zenodo.3931989 +3931989 + + + + +Lonicera pyrenaica +, +spec. nov. + + + +7. Lonicera pedunculis bifloris, baccis distinctis, foliis oblongis glabris. + +Lonicera pedunculis bifloris, baccis distinctis, floribus infundibuli-formibus, ramis divaricatis. +Roy. lugdb. 238. + + +Xylosteum pyrenaicum. +Tournef. inst. 609. Magn. hort. 209. t.209. Raj. dendr.29. + + + + +Habitat in +Pyrenaeis +. + + + + +Differt a praecedente Corollis regularibus, Ramis divaricatis, Foliis glabris. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F1/8F/37F18F27115EEA42C5553575E1154795.xml b/data/37/F1/8F/37F18F27115EEA42C5553575E1154795.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4d86a2795d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F1/8F/37F18F27115EEA42C5553575E1154795.xml @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + +Skeletons in confusion: a review of astrophorid sponges with (dicho-) calthrops as structural megascleres (Porifera, Demospongiae, Astrophorida) + + + +Author + +Van Soest, Rob W. M. + + + +Author + +Beglinger, Elly J. + + + +Author + +De Voogd, Nicole J. + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2010 + +68 + + +1 +88 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.68.729 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.68.729 +1313-2970-68-1 + + + + +Dercitus Stoeba occultus Hentschel, 1909 + + + + +Dercitus occultus +Hentschel 1909 +: 352, text-fig. 1. + + + +Material examined. + +None. The type material collected by Michaelsen & Hartmeyer from Shark Bay, West Australia could not be found in ZMB (listed as a slide ZMB 4492 in +Hooper and Wiedenmayer, 1994 +: 324). + + + +Description +(from Hentschel, 1909). Endolithic within corals, filling tubular cavities of 1-2 mm diameter which connect to the outside in only a few places. Colour (in alcohol) a deep brown. The skeleton consists of dichocalthrops and sanidasters. + +Dichocalthrops relatively small, protocladi 20-28 +µm +, deuterocladi 50-92 +µm +, rhabd 86-105 +x +12-18 +µm +(computed cladome diameter 130-230 +µm +). + + +Sanidasters 13-21 +x +1.5 +µm +. Spines are described as strongly developed and irregular, but only tiny drawings of these spicules are provided, which only show elongated rhabd shapes. + + + +Habitat. +An endolithic species from shallow coral reefs (0.5-3.5 m). + + +Distribution. +West Australia, Shark Bay, shallow water. + + +Remark. + +In spicule size this species appears close to +Dercitus (Halinastra) sibogae +sp. n. (see below), but that species has both +'normal' +and compressed sanidasters, and it is epilithic. Details of the cladi lengths of the megascleres are also different. + + +The only other species of +Dercitus (Stoeba) +from Australian waters, +Dercitus (Stoeba) xanthus +Sutcliffe et al. 2010, differs sharply from the present species in the absence of dichocalthrops, in stead of which there are exclusively three-claded calthrops megascleres. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F2/84/37F28454E61E56A1E2746F8815F660C8.xml b/data/37/F2/84/37F28454E61E56A1E2746F8815F660C8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3077678ddd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F2/84/37F28454E61E56A1E2746F8815F660C8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +Guide to the Vascular Flora of the Savannas and Flatwoods of Shaken Creek Preserve and Vicinity (Pender & Onslow Counties, North Carolina, U. S. A.) + + + +Author + +Thornhill, Robert + + + +Author + +Krings, Alexander + + + +Author + +Lindbo, David + + + +Author + +Stucky, Jon + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1099 +1099 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1099 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1099 +1314-2828-2-1099 + + + + +Eryngium yuccifolium var. synchaetum A. Gray ex J.M. Coult. & Rose + + + +Ecological interactions + +Conservation status +W2; S2, G5T5. + + + +Distribution +Wet pine savannas (WLPS, VWLPS). + + +Notes + +Infrequent. +Jun-Aug +. Thornhill 689, 703 (NCSC). Specimens seen in the vicinity: Sandy Run: Levy s.n. (DUKE!; as +Eryngium yuccifolium +), Taggart SARU 280 (WNC!), Wilbur 53709 (DUKE!; as +Eryngium yuccifolium +). [= RAB, Weakley] + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F2/AC/37F2ACE918655A56A6F73842FB6C3A8C.xml b/data/37/F2/AC/37F2ACE918655A56A6F73842FB6C3A8C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8b3ad6ff3b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F2/AC/37F2ACE918655A56A6F73842FB6C3A8C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ + + + +A maximalist approach to the systematics of a biological control agent: Gryon aetherium Talamas, sp. nov. (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae) + + + +Author + +Talamas, Elijah J. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1048-6345 +Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA +elijah.talamas@fdacs.gov + + + +Author + +Bremer, Jonathan S. +Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA + + + +Author + +Moore, Matthew R. +Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA + + + +Author + +Bon, Marie-Claude +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5914-1682 +USDA-ARS-EBCL, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Lahey, Zachary +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9402-9570 +Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA + + + +Author + +Roberts, Cheryl G. +Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA + + + +Author + +Combee, Lynn A. +Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA + + + +Author + +McGathey, Natalie +Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA + + + +Author + +van Noort, Simon +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6930-9741 +Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, South Africa + + + +Author + +Timokhov, Alexander V. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7040-6290 +Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia + + + +Author + +Hougardy, Evelyne +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7537-470X +USDA-ARS-ISPH, Albany, CA, USA + + + +Author + +Hogg, Brian +USDA-ARS-ISPH, Albany, CA, USA + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2021 + +2021-12-23 + + +87 + + +323 +480 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.87.72842 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.87.72842 +1314-2607-87-323 +E343379ED04447ABA1ED47B3F01F3E59 +D03A96052A8550F9918BB08ACA344FB9 +5811493 + + + + +Gryon thema Mineo + + + + +Gryon thema +Mineo, 1991: 38 (original description, assigned to +Gryon myrmecophilum +species group); Mineo & Caleca, 1994: 120 (distribution). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F3/00/37F3000E378CC4C671D3098FDB050E3E.xml b/data/37/F3/00/37F3000E378CC4C671D3098FDB050E3E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..43ea75be9d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F3/00/37F3000E378CC4C671D3098FDB050E3E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +A review of the genus Mystrium (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Indo-Australian region. + + + +Author + +Bihn, J. H. + + + +Author + +Verhaagh, M. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2007 + +1642 + + +1 +12 + + + + +http://hdl.handle.net/10199/15412 + +journal article +21332 +EE70683C-1EF6-4AE4-B8FF-0C6CE2B68C52 + + + + +[[ Genus +Mystrium +Roger ]] + + + + +The genus +Mystrium +Roger is morphologically very peculiar within the poneromorph subfamily group and has the following combination of characteristics: the very wide head; spatulate or squamate hairs on the head; and long, narrow mandibles with a double row of teeth on the inner margins. Monophyly of the genus is strongly supported by a recent molecular phylogenetic study (Saux et al. 2004). Besides their bizarre morphology +Mystrium +ants have also evolved some unique biological traits. They have a unique defense mechanism in which they snap their mandibles to generate a powerful strike (Gronenberg et al. 1998; Moffett 1986). Molet et al. (2006) demonstrated that, in some species of +Mystrium +known from Madagascar, normal queens are replaced by wingless reproductives which are smaller than workers. Because +Mystrium +are rarely encountered, information on their general biology, ecology and behavior remains sparse. They are presumably predaceous like other species of the subfamily +Amblyoponinae +, although no direct evidence is available (Brown 1960). + + +The genus was erected by Roger (1862) with the description of the queen of +M. mysticum +. There are few species, all of which occur in the rainforests of the Old World. Most species are found in tropical Africa: six of them are restricted to Madagascar (and its adjacent islands, i.e. the Malagasy region sensu Bolton 1994) and one is recorded from continental Africa. +Mystrium camillae Emery +1889 is widespread in the Indo-Australian region. Xu (1998) recently described +M. oculatum +from southern China, but we do not regard it as a distinct species. Since the first revision of Menozzi (1929) only Brown (1960) made some revisionary notes on the genus. Here we describe two new species of +Mystrium +from Papua and West Papua Province, Indonesia, and provide a review of the species known from the Indo-Australian Region. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F3/66/37F366D6B9C5DF600280FF30EB619BE3.xml b/data/37/F3/66/37F366D6B9C5DF600280FF30EB619BE3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f39482102bb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F3/66/37F366D6B9C5DF600280FF30EB619BE3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Guide to the Vascular Flora of the Savannas and Flatwoods of Shaken Creek Preserve and Vicinity (Pender & Onslow Counties, North Carolina, U. S. A.) + + + +Author + +Thornhill, Robert + + + +Author + +Krings, Alexander + + + +Author + +Lindbo, David + + + +Author + +Stucky, Jon + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2014 + +2 + + +1099 +1099 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1099 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1099 +1314-2828-2-1099 + + + + +Eryngium aquaticum var. aquaticum L. + + + +Distribution +Wet pine savannas (VWLPS). + + +Notes + +Rare. +Jul-Sep +. Thornhill 842, 1537, 1548 (NCSC). Specimens seen in the vicinity: Sandy Run [ +Haw's +Run]: Taggart SARU 661 (WNC!). [= RAB, Weakley] + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F3/F2/37F3F23F6F0C14EB6197B3085C3492BA.xml b/data/37/F3/F2/37F3F23F6F0C14EB6197B3085C3492BA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..39e920f2474 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F3/F2/37F3F23F6F0C14EB6197B3085C3492BA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ + + + +Die Milbenfauna der Nordseeinsel Wangerooge + + + +Author + +Willmann, C. + +text + + +Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Meeresforschung Bremerhaven + + +1952 + +1 + + +139 +186 + + + + +http://unknown + +journal article +ORI11037 +1CD7624C-FC8F-4DD0-AA34-762D8FFB6267 + + + + +105. +Hermannia pulchella +nov. nom. + + + + + +Fundort: + +Wangerooge-Ost, Deich, Wattseite, unten am +Fusse +des Deiches + +, + +17. I. 50 + +. + + + + + +Unter dem Namen +Hermannia scrabra +(L. Koch 1879) sind bisher zwei Formen miteinander vermengt worden, die sich in ihrer +Rueckenstruktur +deutlich unterscheiden lassen. Die Unterschiede sind so +betraechtlich +, +dass +es geraten erscheint, zwei gute Species daraus zu machen. Die eine Art, die ich auf Wangerooge, Norderney ( +beiderwaerts +in den Wattwiesen) und an der +Aussenweser +(hier an Fadenalgen in kleinen, von der Flut +zurueckgebliebenen +Wasseransammlungen) gefunden habe, die in der Sammlung Oudemans von der Insel Borkum und aus Finnland vertreten ist, und die Strenzke an der +Kueste +Holsteins festgestellt hat, hat einen ziemlich glatten, dunklen Panzer, der sehr fein und dicht perforiert erscheint. Unter der +Oberflaeche +sieht man ein feines Netzwerk mit Maschen von 15-20 +y +Durchmesser. Die Tiere +muessen +stark aufgehellt werden, oder man +muss +den +Rueckenpanzer +abheben, um die Netzmaschen erkennen zu +koennen +. Bei der anderen Art ist der +Ruecken +ziemlich +unregelmaessig +mit kleinen, erhabenen +Knoetchen +besetzt, die selten Maschen bilden, aber sich weiter hinten auf dem +Ruecken +zu +Laengsreihen +aneinanderschliessen +. Leider sind die L. Kochschen Typen nicht mehr aufzufinden, und so ist es schwer zu entscheiden, welche dieser beiden Arten die wirkliche +H. scabra +ist. Da Strenzke in Material aus +Groenland +die Form mit den erhabenen +Knoetchen +vorgelegen hat, ist anzunehmen, +dass +Koch diese Species auch in Sibirien und Novaja Semlja gefunden hat. Das +waere +dann die typische +H. scabra +. Die Art ist weit verbreitet, sie wurde auch in der Umgebung von Bremen in Moos am +Fusse +alter Mauern und +Bauernhaeuser +gefunden, aus dem gleichen Lebensraume liegt sie vor aus Admont (Steiermark). + + + + +Die an der Nord- und Ostsee als +Kuestenform +auftretenden, bisher auch als +H. scabra +bezeichneten Tiere haben somit noch keinen Namen. Ich nenne sie +Hermannia pulchella +nov. nom. +- +Hermannia scabra +wird ferner von der +Kueste +Schwedens (Sellnick 1949), Island (Sellnick 1940), West-Groenland +( +Joergensen +1934) gemeldet, ohne +dass +ueber +die Struktur etwas angegeben wird. Ohne die Tiere gesehen zu haben, ist nicht zu entscheiden, um welche der beiden Arten es sich in diesen +Faellen +handelt. Dasselbe gilt +fuer +Hermannia nodosa +(Michael 1888), einen Namen, den Michael selbst 1896 (Tierreich, Lfg. 3) gegen +H. scabra +zurueckgezogen +hat. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F4/58/37F4588D4F345A08AE01AC391B2D01C7.xml b/data/37/F4/58/37F4588D4F345A08AE01AC391B2D01C7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ffba79a9b8e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F4/58/37F4588D4F345A08AE01AC391B2D01C7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,266 @@ + + + +Systematic revision of the snorkel snail genus Rhiostoma Benson, 1860 (Gastropoda, Caenogastropoda, Cyclophoridae) with descriptions of new species + + + +Author + +Tongkerd, Piyoros +Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand + + + +Author + +Tumpeesuwan, Sakboworn +Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand & Present address: Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Kantharawichai, Maha Sarakham 44150 Thailand + + + +Author + +Inkhavilay, Khamla +Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Science, National University of Laos, P. O. Box 7322, Dongdok, Vientiane, Laos + + + +Author + +Prasankok, Pongpun +School of Biology, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand + + + +Author + +Jeratthitikul, Ekgachai +Animal Systematics and Molecular Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand + + + +Author + +Panha, Somsak +Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand +somsak.pan@chula.ac.th + + + +Author + +Sutcharit, Chirasak +Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand +jirasak4@yahoo.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2023 + +2023-01-24 + + +1142 + + +1 +144 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1142.90097 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1142.90097 +1313-2970-1142-1 +A1129EE50F9941CFB73AE771B66E2486 +1D4BDF04F72B59B9984E00D0B4FB338D + + + + +16. +Rhiostoma abletti Thach, 2016 + + + + +Figs 34 +, 37 + + + + +Rhiostoma abletti +Thach, 2016: 37, 38, figs 53, 122-124. Type locality: Northwest of Lai Chau city, on the way going to Paso, Lai Chau Province, North Vietnam. +Sutcharit et al. 2019 +: 5, fig. 1a. + + +Rhiostoma christae +Thach, 2016: 38, figs 51, 130-133. Type locality: Near the road No. 6 to Chieng Ngan, Son La Province, North Vietnam. +Sutcharit et al. 2019 +: 17, fig. 3l. New synonym. + + +Rhiostoma ninhbien +Do, Nguyen & Do, 2020b: 169, 170, fig. 2a-c. Type locality: near Tay Trang international border gate, Na U Commune, Dien Bien District, Dien Bien Province, Vietnam. New synonym. + + +Rhiostoma marioni +- +Do et al. 2020b +: 168 (in part), fig. 1e, f (not +Ancey 1898 +). + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +NHMUK 20160307 (Fig. +37A +) from Northwest of Lai Chau city, on the way going to Paso, Lai Chau Province, Vietnam. +Holotype +NHMUK 20160306 (Fig. +37B +) of + +Rhiostoma christae + +Thach, 2016, from Near the road No. 6 to Chieng Ngan, Son La Province (North Vietnam). + + + +Figure 37. +Shell of + +Rhiostoma abletti + +A +holotype NHMUK 20160307 from Lai Chau Province, Vietnam +B +holotype of + +Rhiostoma christae + +Thach, 2016, NHMUK 20160306 from Son La Province, Vietnam +C, D +specimens CUMZ 10207 from Ban Na Puek, Meuang Hiam, Houaphanh, Laos +E, F +specimens CUMZ 10206 from Hot Springs, Meuang Hiam, Houaphanh, Laos. + + + + +Other material examined. + + + +Laos + +: Hot Springs (Vieng Thong), +Meuang Hiam District +, +Houaphanh Province +: CUMZ 10206 (3 shells; Fig. +37E, F +). +Near Ban Na Puek +, +Meuang Hiam District +, +Houaphanh Province +: CUMZ 10207 (2 shells; Fig. +37C, D +) + +. + + + +Diagnosis. +Shell medium, thin and flattened; detached whorl shorter than apertural width. Shell colour with brownish zigzag patterns. Breathing device with incomplete tube shape and nearly perpendicular to detached whorl. + + +Differential diagnosis. + +This species can be distinguished from + +R. anceyi + +sp. nov. by having an incomplete tube breathing device that is nearly perpendicular to detached whorl, and translucent periostracum. In contrast, the new species has a tubular breathing device, and thickened and reddish brown periostracum. + + + +Description. + + +Shell +. + +Shell medium, width 38.5 mm, height 14.5 mm, thin, and flattened to sub-discoidal shape. Apex acute; spire slightly elevated to flattened. Whorls 5 to 6, convex, increasing regularly; suture wide and depressed; last whorl rounded and stout. Shell surface with fine growth lines. Periostracum thick corneous and translucent. Shell colour with dark brown zigzag pattern; with narrow dark spiral band on periphery. Detached whorl shorter than apertural width. Peristome circular and double; lip thickened and slightly expanded. Aperture opened sub-laterally. Breathing device with incomplete tube shape and nearly perpendicular to detached whorl; outer lip forming a short to long nearly closed tube; inner lip with deep incision or small hole inside aperture. Umbilicus widely opened and deep. Operculum calcareous, low cup-shaped, and multispiral (Fig. +37 +). + + + +Distribution. + +This species is known from Lai Chau, Son La and Dien Bien provinces, northern Vietnam. The current study recorded specimens from a few localities in Hua Phan Province, northern Laos (Fig. +34 +). + + + +Remarks. + +The holotypes of + +R. abletti + +from Lai Chau Province (Fig. +37A +), " + +R. christae + +" from Son La Province (Fig. +37B +) and " + +R. ninhbien + +" from Dien Bien Province (see +Do et al. 2020b +: fig. 2a-c) are nearly identical in appearance. They have a depressed shell, with short detached whorl and incomplete tube shape, but are slightly different in the shell colour pattern, which could not be used as a diagnostic trait. In addition, the type localities of these three species are in neighbouring areas of northern Vietnam, less than 150 km apart. Therefore, we recognise + +R. christae + +and + +R. ninhbien + +as junior subjective synonyms of + +R. abletti + +. + + +The specimens from Hua Phan Province, Laos, tend to have thicker periostracum and more coarse growth lines than the type specimen. However, a short detached whorl and incomplete tube as breathing device suggest they are more closely related to + +R. abletti + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F4/81/37F481037678CA62CFE8892C4D91BB08.xml b/data/37/F4/81/37F481037678CA62CFE8892C4D91BB08.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1311c48defb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F4/81/37F481037678CA62CFE8892C4D91BB08.xml @@ -0,0 +1,566 @@ + + + +Revision of Palearctic Trissolcus Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae) + + + +Author + +Talamas, Elijah J. +Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA / ARS c / o NMNH, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, USA +talamas.1@osu.edu + + + +Author + +Buffington, Matthew L. +Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA / ARS c / o NMNH, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, USA + + + +Author + +Hoelmer, Kim +Beneficial Insects Introduction Research Unit, USDA / ARS, Newark DE, USA + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2017 + +2017-06-21 + + +56 + + +3 +185 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.56.10158 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.56.10158 +1314-2607-56-3 +C3D00EFBD19C4F8695FFC9D01780A9A1 +FFBAFFB3FFEFFFAFFF9FFF87FFD81245 +1138671 + + + + +Trissolcus oobius (Kozlov) +Figures 118-119 +, 120-127 + + + + +Trissolcus aglaope +(Kozlov & +Le +) syn. n.; http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/3176; Morphbank37 + + +Trissolcus dirrhope +(Kozlov & +Le +) syn. n.; http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/3216; Morphbank38 + + +Trissolcus dryope +(Kozlov & +Le +) syn. n.; http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/3220; Morphbank39 + + +Trissolcus lampe +(Kozlov & +Le +) syn. n.; http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/3251 + + +Trissolcus merope +(Kozlov & +Le +) syn. n.; http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/3266; Morphbank40 + + +Trissolcus niceppe +(Kozlov & +Le +) syn. n.; http://bioguid.osu.edu/xbiod_concepts/3272; Morphbank41 + + +Aporophlebus oobius +Kozlov, 1972: 670 (original description); Kononova, 1973: 439, 440 (description, keyed); Kozlov & +Le +, 1976: 350 (keyed). + + +Aporophlebus dirrhope +Kozlov & +Le +, 1976: 351, 368 (original description, keyed). + + +Aporophlebus dryope +Kozlov & +Le +, 1976: 351, 365 (original description, keyed). + + +Aporophlebus lampe +Kozlov & +Le +, 1976: 350, 360 (original description, keyed). + + +Aporophlebus merope +Kozlov & +Le +, 1976: 350, 359 (original description, keyed). + + +Aporophlebus niceppe +Kozlov & +Le +, 1976: 351, 369 (original description, keyed). + + +Trissolcus oobius +(Kozlov): Kozlov & +Le +, 1977: 518 (generic transfer, keyed); Kozlov, 1978: 637 (description); Kozlov & Kononova, 1983: 126 (description); Kononova, 1995: 98 (keyed); Petrov, 2013: 326 (keyed). + + +Aporophlebus aglaope +Kozlov & +Le +, 1976: 351, 363 (original description, keyed). + + +Trissolcus aglaope +(Kozlov & +Le +) syn. n.: Kozlov & +Le +, 1977: 519 (generic transfer, keyed); Kozlov, 1978: 637 (description); Kozlov & Kononova, 1983: 133 (description). + + +Trissolcus dirrhope +(Kozlov & +Le +) syn. n.: Kozlov & +Le +, 1977: 519 (generic transfer, keyed); Kozlov, 1978: 638 (description); Kozlov & Kononova, 1983: 134 (description). + + +Trissolcus dryope +(Kozlov & +Le +) syn. n.: Kozlov & +Le +, 1977: 519 (generic transfer, keyed); Kozlov, 1978: 637 (description); Kozlov & Kononova, 1983: 132 (description); Kononova, 1995: 98 (keyed); Ghahari, Buhl & Kocak, 2011: 595 (listed). + + +Trissolcus lampe +(Kozlov & +Le +) syn. n.: Kozlov & +Le +, 1977: 518 (generic transfer, keyed); Kozlov, 1978: 637 (description); Kozlov & Kononova, 1983: 129 (description). + + +Trissolcus merope +(Kozlov & +Le +) syn. n.: Kozlov & +Le +, 1977: 518 (generic transfer, keyed); Kozlov, 1978: 637 (description); Kozlov & Kononova, 1983: 124 (description); Kononova, 1995: 98 (keyed). + + +Trissolcus niceppe +(Kozlov & +Le +) syn. n.: Kozlov & +Le +, 1977: 519 (generic transfer, keyed); Kozlov, 1978: 638 (description); Kozlov & Kononova, 1983: 135 (description). + + + +Description. +Female body length: 0.68-1.04 mm (n=8). Body color: head and mesosoma black, metasoma black to reddish brown. + + +Figures 118-119. + +T. oobius + +, female paratype (USNMENT00916617) +118 +head, mesosoma, metasoma, lateral view +119 +head, mesosoma, metasoma, dorsal view. Scale bars in millimeters. + + + + +Figures 120-127. + +T. oobius + +120 +female paratype of + +T. niceppe + +(USNMENT00916279), head and mesosoma, ventrolateral view +121 +female paratype of + +T. oobius + +(USNMENT00916617), head, mesosoma, T1-T2, dorsolateral view +122 +female paratype of + +T. merope + +(USNMENT00916614), head and anterior mesosoma, lateral view +123 +female paratype of + +T. dirrhope + +(USNMENT00916275), head, anterior view +124 +female paratype of + +T. merope + +(USNMENT00916614), venation of fore wing, dorsal view +125 +female paratype of + +T. dirrhope + +(USNMENT00916275), venation of fore wing, dorsal view +126 +female paratype of + +T. niceppe + +(USNMENT00916279), venation of fore wing, dorsal view +127 +female paratype of + +T. oobius + +(USNMENT00916619), venation of fore wing, dorsal view. Scale bars in millimeters. + + + +Head. +Color of radicle: pale brown; yellow; brown. Length of radicle: less than width of clypeus. Color of A7-A11 in female: pale brown. Number of basiconic sensilla on A6: 0. Number of basiconic sensilla on A7: 0. Color of A1-A7 in female: yellow; pale brown. Facial striae: absent. Number of clypeal setae: 6. Microsculpture on gena directly above mandibular condyle: absent; present. Shape of ventral gena in lateral view: narrow. Genal carina: absent; present and extending dorsally to vicinity of lower margin eye; present only at base of mandible. Malar striae: absent. Orbital furrow: uniform in width between midpoint of eye and malar sulcus. Macrosculpture of frons between antennal scrobe and anterior ocellus: absent; weakly transversely strigose. Preocellar pit: absent; present. Setation of lateral frons: sparse. Punctation of lateral frons: absent. Sculpture directly ventral to preocellar pit: microsculptured. Macrosculpture of lateral frons: absent; weakly horizontally striate, striae of antennal scrobe extending to lateral frons. OOL: lateral ocellus and eye without continuous scleritic separation; separated by less than one ocellar diameter. Hyperoccipital carina: absent. Macrosculpture of posterior vertex: absent. Microsculpture on posterior vertex along occipital carina: present. Anterior margin of occipital carina: finely crenulate to smooth. + + +Mesosoma. +Epomial carina: absent. Macrosculpture of lateral pronotum directly anterior to netrion: finely rugulose. Netrion sulcus: complete. Pronotal suprahumeral sulcus in posterior half of pronotum: undifferentiated from sculpture of dorsal pronotum. Number of episternal foveae: 0. Subacropleural sulcus: present. Speculum: weakly transversely wrinkled. Mesopleural pit: extending ventrally into dorsoventral furrow parallel to mesopleural carina. Mesopleural carina: well defined anteriorly, poorly defined to absent posteriorly. Sculpture of femoral depression: smooth. Patch of striae at posteroventral end of femoral depression: absent; present, striae weakly developed and perpendicular to long axis of femoral depression. Setal patch at posteroventral end of femoral depression: present. Microsculpture of anteroventral mesopleuron: present throughout; present dorsally. Macrosculpture of anteroventral mesopleuron: absent. Postacetabular sulcus: formed by small punctures. Mesopleural epicoxal sulcus: formed by open crenulae. Mesofurcal pit: absent. Setation of posteroventral metapleuron: absent. Sculpture of dorsal metapleural area: absent. Posterodorsal metapleural sulcus: present as line of foveae. Paracoxal sulcus in ventral half of metapleuron: absent. Anteroventral extension of metapleuron: not extending to base of mesocoxa. Metapleural epicoxal sulcus: absent or indistinguishable from sculpture. Mesoscutal humeral sulcus: present as a simple furrow. Median mesoscutal carina: absent. Macrosculpture of mesoscutum: absent; weakly rugulose posteriorly. +Pattern +of mesoscutal microsculpture: uniform throughout. Mesoscutal suprahumeral sulcus: comprised of cells. Length of mesoscutal suprahumeral sulcus: about half the length of anterolateral edge of mesoscutum. Parapsidal line: absent. Notaulus: absent; indicated only at posterior margin of mesoscutum. Median protuberance on anterior margin of mesoscutellum: absent. Protruberance on anterior margin of mesoscutellum directly posterior to notaulus: absent. Shape of dorsal margin of anterior lobe of axillar crescent: flat, appearing fused with lateral margin of mesoscutum. Sculpture of anterior lobe of axillar crescent: dorsoventrally strigose. Posterodorsal margin of axillular carina: round. Area bounded by axillar crescent: smooth. Macrosculpture of mesoscutellum: absent. Microsculpture on mesoscutellum: present throughout; absent; present laterally, absent medially. Median mesoscutellar carina: absent. Setation of posterior scutellar sulcus: absent. Form of metascutellum: single row of cells. Metanotal trough: foveate, foveae occupying more than half of metanotal height. Metapostnotum: invaginated near lateral edge of metascutellum. Length of postmarginal vein: shorter than length of stigmal vein. Color of legs: coxae brown, femora and tibiaie yellow to pale brown, elsewhere yellow. Anteromedial portion of metasomal depression: punctate or crenulate; smooth. + + +Metasoma. +Longitudinal striae on T1 posterior to basal costae: present; absent; weakly present. Number of sublateral setae (on one side): 1. Setation of laterotergite 1: absent. Longitudinal striation of T2: absent; faintly present anteriorly. Setation of T2: sparsely present in posterolateral corner. Setation of laterotergite 2: present. + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Trissolcus oobius + +shares with + +T. hyalinipennis + +a 4-merous antennal clava in females. This character, in combination with a postmarginal vein that is shorter than the stigmal vein, unambiguously seperates it from all Palearctic species. Kozlov described numerous species based on small differences in the length of the postmarginal vein, and we here treat most of them as as junior synonyms. The length of the postmarginal vein varies from nearly absent to approaching the length of the stigmal vein in a continuous gradient such that separation based on arbitrary lengths is not useful for species identification (see Figures +124-127 +). + + + +Material examined. + + +Holotype +, female, + +T. oobius + +: + +RUSSIA + +: +Altay +Terr., +Kosh-Agach +, +17.VI.1964 +, Kozlov, ZMAS 0130 (deposited in ZIN) + +. + +Paratypes +of + +T. oobius + +: + +RUSSIA + +: 4 unsexed, USNMENT00916616-00916619 (ZIN) + +. + +Holotype +, female, + +T. aglaope + +: + +TURKMENISTAN + +: +Lebap Prov. +, +Repetek +, +6.VI.1968 +, Sugonyaev, ZMAS 0117 (deposited in ZIN) + +. + +Paratype +of + +T. oobius + +: + +TURKMENISTAN + +: +1 male +, USNMENT00916326 (ZIN) + +. + +Holotype +, female, + +T. dirrhope + +: + +TURKMENISTAN + +: +Lebap Prov. +, + +Halac + +(Khalach), +25.VI.1967 +, ZMAS 0123 (deposited in ZIN) + +. + +Paratype +of + +T. dirrhope + +: + +TURKMENISTAN + +: +1 female +, USNMENT00916275 (ZIN) + +. + +Holotype +, female, + +T. dryope + +: + +KAZAKHSTAN + +: +Atyrau +(Gurev) Reg., shore, +Lake Inder +, +11.VII.1974 +, +V. V. Kostjukov +, ZMAS 0124 (deposited in ZIN) + +. + +Paratype +of + +T. dryope + +: + +MONGOLIA + +: +1 female +, USNMENT00916277 (ZIN) + +. + +Holotype +, female, + +T. lampe + +: + +KAZAKHSTAN + +: +Atyrau +(Gurev) Reg., + +Ural +River Floodplain + + +, +Inderbor +(Inderborskiy), +8.VII.1974 +, +V. V. Kostjukov +, ZMAS 0126 (deposited in ZIN) + +. + +Holotype +, female, + +T. merope + +: + +RUSSIA + +: +Altay +Terr., +Kosh-Agach +, +11.VII.1964 +, Kozlov, ZMAS 0127 (deposited in ZIN) + +. + +Paratype +of + +T. merope + +: + +RUSSIA + +: +1 female +, USNMENT00916614 (ZIN) + +. +Paratypes +of + +T. niceppe + +: ( +2 females +) + + +ARMENIA + +: +1 female + +, USNMENT00916279 (ZIN). + + +TURKMENISTAN + +: +1 female + +, ZMAS 0129 (ZIN). +Other material +: ( +4 females +) + +IRAN + +: + +1 female +, USNMENT00896237 (CNCI). + +ISRAEL + + +: + +2 females +, USNMENT00896142, 00896145 (CNCI). + +TURKMENISTAN + + +: +1 female +, UCRC ENT 296993 (UCRC). + + + +Comments. + +The degree to which longitudinal rugae extend from the basal costae of T1 is variable, ranging from essentially absent to distinctly present. Similarly, anterior T1 may be faintly striate or entirely smooth. Microsculpture on the mesoscutellum varies from present throughout to absent, and in some specimens the microsculpture is only present laterally. Specimens in the type series of + +T. oobius + +are larger than the specimens in the type series of species here treated as junior synonyms. These larger specimens have coarser sculpture on the frons and a distinct preocellar pit. In the smallest specimens the preocellar pit is absent and in specimens of intermediary size the pit is absent or very small. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F4/BF/37F4BFA3774E5722A1DBAC249040C466.xml b/data/37/F4/BF/37F4BFA3774E5722A1DBAC249040C466.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..45d5fbf2ffb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F4/BF/37F4BFA3774E5722A1DBAC249040C466.xml @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ + + + +Description of three new species of Benedictus (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae, Alticini) from China, with comments on their biology and modified ethanol traps for collecting flea beetles + + + +Author + +Ruan, Yongying +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5025-5592 +Plant Protection Research Center, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen 518055, China +yongyingruan@hotmail.com + + + +Author + +Konstantinov, Alexander S. +https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6578-6735 +Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA, Smithsonian Institution, P. O. Box 37012, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012, USA + + + +Author + +Damaska, Albert F. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3640-626X +Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic + + + +Author + +Zheng, Lihao +Guang'an Vocational and Technical College, Guang'an 638000, China + + + +Author + +Chen, Jun +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0325-2532 +Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China + + + +Author + +Meng, Ziye +Plant Protection Research Center, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen 518055, China & Research Center of Buckwheat Industry Technology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, China +iorimouse@126.com + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2023 + +2023-08-30 + + +1177 + + +147 +165 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1177.102811 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1177.102811 +1313-2970-1177-147 +72997BC7B3014EAB95FB3B6FD839B1F4 +10CD0C0FE7395E18B1771C14FF3EC42D + + + + +Benedictus quadrimaculatus Ruan & Konstantinov +sp. nov. + + + + +Figs 4 +, 5 + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +: ♂ (SZPT), labels: 1) China, Yunnan, Yuanyang County, Xinjie, +23.1163°N +, +102.7690°E +, 1900 m. Leg. Y. Ruan & M. Zhang 2019.VII.28, Extracted from moss; 2) HOLOTYPE + +Benedictus quadrimaculatus + +sp. nov. Des. +Ruan et al. 2022 +. + + +Paratypes +: 6♂6♀ (SZPT; some would be transferred to IZCAS), labels: 1) China, Yunnan, Yuanyang County, Xinjie, +23.1163°N +, +102.7690°E +, 1900 m. Leg. Y. Ruan & M. Zhang 2019.VII.28, Extracted from moss; 2) PARATYPE + +Benedictus quadrimaculatus + +sp. nov. Des. +Ruan et al. 2022 +. + + + +Diagnosis. + +This new species may be distinguished from other known species of + +Benedictus + +by the following combination of characters: in ventral or dorsal view, apex of median lobe of aedeagus wide and emarginate at middle; four dark maculations present on the abdominal tergites (Figs +4G +, +5A, B +), which are more prominent when the beetle is alive; antennal calli subquadrate with a fovea present between them. Black spots on the abdominal tergites that are visible through elytra is a highly unusual feature that we have not observed in flea beetles before. + + + +Figure 4. +Adult morphology of + +Benedictus quadrimaculatus + +sp. nov. +A-C +holotype, dorsal, lateral, and ventral views +D-F +median lobe of aedeagus (holotype), ventral, dorsal, and lateral views +G +sclerotised and darkened area on the abdominal tergites (arrowed), which are visible through elytra as black spots when the beetle is alive +H +head +I +last visible abdominal tergite of female +J +spermatheca +K +tignum +L +vaginal palpi +M +pronotum. + + + + +Description. +Male body length 1.35-1.45 mm, width 0.80-0.85 mm; female body length 1.45-1.50 mm, width 0.80-0.85 mm (based on all type specimens). Ratio of body length to body width: 1.70-1.77 (one male and one female measured). Entire body evenly yellow-brown to chestnut-brown, including antennae and legs. + + +Head +. + +Head hypognathous. Vertex smooth, without reticulation; a few punctures bearing setae situated above supraorbital sulci on each side. Antennal calli well delimited, subquadrate, and slightly convex; fovea present between antennal calli. Supracallinal and supraorbital sulci deep, forming oblique straight line. Supra-antennal sulcus poorly developed. Facial part of head relatively short. Frontal ridge widest between antennal sockets, strongly narrowed and ridged towards clypeus; frons concave and smooth on each side of frontal ridge, surface without minute longitudinal ridges. Proportions of antennomere lengths: 100: 64: 45: 45: 66: 53: 72: 78: 73: 78: 110 (measured in one individual). + + + +Thorax +. + +Pronotum moderately convex, ratio of pronotum width (measured at middle) to length: 1.30-1.42 (measured in one male and one female). Pronotum widest at middle part. Anterolateral callosity strongly developed, elongate, and somewhat straight, with anterolateral setiferous pore situated at posterior end. Procoxal cavities open posteriorly. Base of pronotum with deep and transverse antebasal groove bearing coarse and large punctures; transverse antebasal groove delimited by a well-developed longitudinal groove on each side. + +Elytra convex, humeral calli absent. Elytra with punctures arranged in regular lines. Hind wings absent. + + +Legs +. + +First male protarsomere larger than that of female. Length of metatibia to first metatarsomere in male: 100: 30. + + + +Male genitalia +. + +Median lobe of aedeagus in ventral view: widest at middle; ventral surface smooth; sides parallel from base to apical fourth, abruptly narrowed with a step at apical fourth; apex wide, emarginated in middle, without denticle. Median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view: slightly sinuate, curved ventrad at basal 3/4, bent dorsad at apical 1/4, apex straight. + + + +Female genitalia +. + +Spermathecal pump cylindrical, very slightly curved, apex broad and rounded; without clear border with receptacle; more or less perpendicular to receptacle. Receptacle of spermatheca pear-shaped, with sides convex. Spermathecal duct without coils. + + + +Variation. +The shape of the pronotum varied slightly by having slightly lesser widths and straighter lateral sides in some individuals. + + +Etymology. + +This species is named after the four dark maculations on its abdominal tergites (Fig. +4G +), which are prominent when the beetle is alive (Fig. +5A, B +). + + + +Type locality. +Yuanyang County, Yunnan Prov., China. + + +Distribution. +China (Yunnan). + + +Host plant. +Unknown. + + +Biology. + +This species is extracted from moss cushions containing multiple moss species using a modified fan-driven Berlese funnel (see +Ruan et al. 2020 +). Live individuals were reared in the laboratory environment; however, no feeding behaviour was observed. + + +Although two larvae (Fig. +5E, F +) were extracted along with the adults from moss, it is unknown if they are conspecific. + + + +Figure 5. +Biology of + +Benedictus quadrimaculatus + +sp. nov. +A, B +photography of living individuals in lab environment +C +photography of the moss cushion at the type locality +D +habitat environment near the type locality +E, F +habitus of two unknown larvae extracted along with the adults of + +B. quadrimaculatus + +from moss. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F4/BF/37F4BFE3EEB8C3A66094A179C32BD686.xml b/data/37/F4/BF/37F4BFE3EEB8C3A66094A179C32BD686.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b5be49bec6e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F4/BF/37F4BFE3EEB8C3A66094A179C32BD686.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Chalcidoidea and Mymarommatoidea + + + +Author + +Dale-Skey, Natalie + + + +Author + +Askew, Richard R. + + + +Author + +Noyes, John S. + + + +Author + +Livermore, Laurence + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +8013 +8013 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8013 +1314-2828--8013 + + + + +Eulophus pennicornis Nees, 1834 + + + + +plumicornis +(Dalman, 1820, +Entedon +) + + +fuliginosus +Nees, 1834 + + +drupes +Walker, 1839 + + +opaculus +(Thomson, 1878, +Cratotechus +) + + + +Distribution +England + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F5/F3/37F5F3E2BC8F4E3287D614F934AD9F32.xml b/data/37/F5/F3/37F5F3E2BC8F4E3287D614F934AD9F32.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..45b2a7cc046 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F5/F3/37F5F3E2BC8F4E3287D614F934AD9F32.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +Taxonomic revision of the rock-dwelling door snail genus Montenegrina Boettger, 1877 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Clausiliidae) + + + +Author + +Feher, Zoltan + + + +Author + +Szekeres, Miklos + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +599 + + +1 +137 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.599.8168 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.599.8168 +1313-2970-599-1 +8BEE967F7C6946928210A440AD8E2018 + + + + +Taxon +classification Animalia Stylommatophora Clausiliidae + + + + + +Montenegrina laxa errans +Eross +& Szekeres, 2006 + +Fig. 21E + + + + +Montenegrina laxa errans +Eross +& Szekeres, 2006 in + +Eross +et al. 2006 + +: 198, fig. 20. - +Nordsieck 2009 +: 73. + + + +Diagnosis. +Shell slender, medium to large, yellowish-corneous. Lower whorls smooth, upper ones finely striate. Neck inflexed, striate. Basal and peripheral crests weak. Peristome angular, with somewhat swollen margin. Lamellae superior and spiralis do not overlap. Subcolumellaris and clausilium plate not visible through the aperture. Lunella lateral to ventrolateral, basalis strong. Subclaustralis short, sulcalis residual or absent. Anterior plica superior long, starts diverging from, then turns parallel to the plica principalis. It is not connected to the lunella complex. + + +Dimensions +(in mm). Hs: 16.0-19.9 (holotype 19.9), Ws: 3.6-4.3 (holotype 4.0). + + +Type locality. + +Albania, Pogradec District, +Cervenake +, 6 km from the Lin to Pogradec road toward the TV transmission tower, 1150 m, +40.9444°N +, +20.6109°E +. + + + +Type material. +Type locality, leg. ZE, ZF, JK, DM, 2.vii.2003, holotype (HNHM 94874), paratypes (NHMUK 20050226, HNC 63190, HNHM 94875/66, NHMW 103287, RMNH 100314, SMF 328091, NMBE 22599/3). + + +Other material. + +Type locality, leg. ZE, ZF, JG, 29.vi.2013 (HNHM 99631); 4 km SW of +Bishnice +, Shkemb i Qytetit, 1140 m, +40.9210°N +, +20.4491°E +, leg. ZF, TN, EM, 12.iv.2014 (HNHM 98950); Librazhd District, Stravaj, 790 m, +41.0042°N +, +20.4343°E +, leg. ZF, TN, EM, 12.iv.2014 (HNHM 98952); +Korce +District, NE of +Strelce +, limestone gorge of the Lumi i +Verbes +at the foot of the +Shkemb +i +Selces +, 990 m, +40.7480°N +, +20.5219°E +, leg. ZF, JG, 30.vi.2013 (NHMW 110430/MN/0103); same locality, leg. ZB, CN, DP, 23.v.2007 (HNHM 99632). + + + +Distribution. + +This is the southernmost +Montenegrina laxa +subspecies, found sporadically around the +Moker +Mts in southeastern Albania (Fig. 23). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F6/64/37F6641D89727AF2CA16E8A37AA1B146.xml b/data/37/F6/64/37F6641D89727AF2CA16E8A37AA1B146.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7333125d2f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F6/64/37F6641D89727AF2CA16E8A37AA1B146.xml @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ + + + +The bee family Halictidae (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) from Central Asia collected by the Kyushu and Shimane Universities Expeditions + + + +Author + +Murao, Ryuki + + + +Author + +Tadauchi, Osamu + + + +Author + +Miyanaga, Ryoichi + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2017 + +5 + + +15050 +15050 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e15050 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e15050 +1314-2828-5-15050 + + + + +Lasioglossum (Hemihalictus) persicum (Cockerell, 1919) + + + +Distribution +Western to central Asia. This species has been recorded from Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan in central Asia. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F7/67/37F76729F0160156AB27AF2DA4737A70.xml b/data/37/F7/67/37F76729F0160156AB27AF2DA4737A70.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7c3c80628c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F7/67/37F76729F0160156AB27AF2DA4737A70.xml @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + +Checklist of the ants (Formicidae Latreille, 1809) of Georgia. + + + +Author + +Gratiashvili, N. + + + +Author + +Barjadze, S. + +text + + +Proceedings of the Institute of Zoology + + +2008 + +23 + + +130 +146 + + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/23047/23047.pdf + +journal article +23047 + + + + +53. +L. (Lasius) alienus (Foerster, 1850) + + + + +Distribution: E.G.: Bank of Jandara Lake, Bolnisi, Bursachili, Gardabani, Grakali, Gudauri, Gveleti, Igoeti, Iraga, Kasristskali, Kavtiskhevi, Kazbegi, Kazreti, Khrami gorge, Kianeti, Kitsnisi, Kojori, Kvishkheti, Lagodekhi Reserve, Larsi, Lekistskali gorge, Luri, Manglisi, Mleta, Mtskheta, Nichbisi, Pantishara, Pasanauri, Poladauri, Saguramo, Sakavre, Samshvilde, Satskhenhesi, Shavimta, Shulaveri, Sighnaghi, Taribana, Tbilisi (Mushtaidi Garden, Tbilisi Botanical Garden), Tetritskaro, Tkemlovani, Tkviavi, Udabno, Zedazeni ( +Ruzsky, 1905 +; +Jijilashvili, 1964a +, b, +1966 +, +1967b +, +1968 +, +1974a +); W.G.: Abasha, Ajishesi, Akhali Atoni, Anaklia, Anaria, Baghdati, Batumi Botanical Garden, Bichvinta Reserve, Bjineti, Chakvi, Chaladidi, Chakvistskali, Eshera, Grigoreti, Ingiri, Inkiti Lake, Kakhaberi, Khobi, Kobuleti, Kutaisi, Lidzava, Menji, Nakalakebi, Natanebi, Ochamchire, Oni, Poti, Senaki, Sokhumi, Sviri, Tsaishi, Tsalenjikha, Tsesi, Zestaponi, Zugdidi Botanical Garden ( +Ruzsky, 1905 +; +Karavaiev, 1926 +; +Jijilashvili, 1974b +); S.G.: Abastumani, Akhalkalaki, Akhaltsikhe, Aspindza, Avralo, Bakuriani, Bogdanovka, Borjomi, Dmanisi, Goderdzi Pass, Gogasheni, Kariani, Khanchali Lake, Ota, Paravani Lake, Sapara, Tabatskuri, Trialeti, Tsalka, Zekari Pass ( +Ruzsky, 1905 +; +Jijilashvili, 1967a +, +1974a +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F7/8D/37F78D77F07CA2FDCA31ABB29C746F21.xml b/data/37/F7/8D/37F78D77F07CA2FDCA31ABB29C746F21.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f509af9f754 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F7/8D/37F78D77F07CA2FDCA31ABB29C746F21.xml @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ + + + +Revision of Cyrtandra (Gesneriaceae) in the Marquesas Islands + + + +Author + +Wagner, Warren L. +Department of Botany, MRC- 166, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P. O. Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012 +wagnerw@si.edu + + + +Author + +Wagner, Anthony J. +Department of Botany, MRC- 166, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P. O. Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013 - 7012 + + + +Author + +Lorence, David H. +National Tropical Botanical Garden, 3530 Papalina Road, Kalaheo, HI 96741 - 9599, USA + +text + + +PhytoKeys + + +2013 + +2013-11-27 + + +30 + + +33 +64 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.30.6147 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.30.6147 +1314-2003-30-33 +D914FFF0FFC8FF9C2C0A744BED3DFFF7 +576187 + + + + +5. +Cyrtandra uapouensis W. L. Wagner & Lorence +sp. nov. +Fig. 7 + + + +Type. +Marquesas Islands: Ua Pou: Ua Pou: Ridge just north of Oave, between Oave and Matahenua, high mountain peaks along main backbone ridge, 945 m, 9°23'455"S, 140°4'433"W, 3 July 2004, S. P. Perlman & K. R. Wood 19085 (holotype: PTBG-042428!; isotypes: BISH!, MO, NY, P, PAP, US!). + + +Description. + +Shrubs 1.5-3 m tall; stems usually few. Leaves opposite, borne on upper 3-5 nodes, elliptic-oblanceolate to elliptic, 19-28 +x +8-13 cm, upper surface glossy, dark green, glabrate, lower surface pale green, ferruginous pubescent when young, when maturing pubescent primarily along the veins, margins serrulate, apex rounded and usually acuminate, base attenuate, petioles 4.5-7 cm. Flowers in congested cymes 1-3 cm long arising in the upper leaf axils, flowers 1-6, ferruginous pubescent, quickly glabrate, peduncles 3-15 mm long, ca. 1-2 mm in diameter, pedicels 0-10 mm, bracts triangular, ca. 8-11 mm; calyx ellipsoid, white, plicate, 20-25 mm long, the lobes 8-13 mm long, deciduous after anthesis; corolla broadly funnelform, tube ca. 22-35 mm, slightly exceeding the calyx, the lobes ca. 8-10 mm long; style ca. 3 mm long, pubescent. Young berry ellipsoid-ovoid, 15-25 mm long. + + + +Distribution. +Marquesas Islands, rare, endemic to high ridges of Ua Pou, from Oave, Matahenua, Teavahaakiti, Tekahuipu, and Tekohepu, 680-945 m. + + +Ecology. + + +Cyrtandra uapouensis + +is known only in + +Metrosideros collina + +- + +Weinmannia marquesana + +wet forest with diverse fern understory and other shrubs and trees such as species of + +Cheirodendron + +, + +Coprosma + +, + +Crossostylis + +, + +Ilex + +, + +Melicope + +, and + +Xylosma + +. + + + +Etymology. +The specific epithet refers to the island of Ua Pou where the only known populations occur. + + +Conservation status. + +IUCN Red List Category: Critically Endangered CR B2a + 2b (i, ii, iii). B2: total area of occupancy less than 10 km2 (ca. 5 km2). B2a, a single population known; b (i-iii), habitat continuing decline inferred. The suitable habitat for + +Cyrtandra uapouensis + +on Ua Pou (ca. 105 km2) is indicated as an endangered environment, threatened feral animals and invasive plants, reducing the extent of the forest ( +Florence and Lorence 1997 +; +Mueller-Dombois and Fosberg 1998 +; +Meyer and Salvat 2009 +). + + + +Specimens examined. + +Marquesas Islands. Ua Pou: +Mt. Tekahoipu, 800 m, 9 September 1922, Quayle 1151 (BISH); +crete +sud menant au mont Teavahaakiti, vallon +a +pente forte, zone semi-ouverte, 810 m, 20 Jun 2004, Meyer 2847 (P, PAP, PTBG, US); Teavahaakiti, steep slopes of main ridge to S of Oave, N & E facing cliffs +between +Teavahaakiti & Tekohepu, 683 m, 5 July 1997, Perlman & Wood 15904 (MO, P, PAP, PTBG, US, WU). + + + +Discussion. + +Gillett (1973) +included the only known specimen of + +Cyrtandra uapouensis + +at that time ( +Quayle 1151 +) within his delimitation of + +Cyrtandra nukuhivensis + +; populations from Ua Pou are here separated based on its occurrence on a different island and its consistently larger leaves. + +Cyrtandra uapouensis + +grows sympatrically with + +Cyrtandra kenwoodii + +, and there are several collections (cited in hybrid section) that are morphologically intermediate between them that appear to represent hybrids. The fact that + +Cyrtandra kenwoodii + +forms a separate branch in the phylogenetic analyses ( +Clark et al. 2009 +; fig. 1) from both the divided calyx group and the plicate calyx group suggests that perhaps this hybridization has impacted the genome of + +Cyrtandra kenwoodii + +or that the species is of hybrid origin. + + + +Figure 7. + +Cyrtandra uapouensis + +W. L. Wagner & Lorence +A +Habit +B +Flower, lateral view +C +Flower, face view. Drawn from Perlman 19085 (isotype, US) [ +A, C +] and Perlman 15904 (PTBG) [ +A, B +] and field images. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F8/44/37F8443A3BEF85DC85F23920B101694E.xml b/data/37/F8/44/37F8443A3BEF85DC85F23920B101694E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..49500c90ceb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F8/44/37F8443A3BEF85DC85F23920B101694E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Cyperaceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +1390 +1458 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Eleocharis obtusa +(Willd.) Schult. + + + + + +Artbeschreibung: Wie + +E. ovata + +, aber bis +60 cm +hoch, mit kurzen unterirdischen +Auslaeufern +. +Staengel +bis +2 mm +dick. +Aehre +8-16 mm +lang. Griffelbasis +0,5-0,8 mm +breit, 2/3 bis fast so breit wie die Frucht. + + + +Verbreitung global: Nordamerikanisch + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F--Lichtzahl L--Salzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl R--Temperaturzahl T--
+Naehrstoffzahl +N +-- +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +--
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: + +Stumpfkoepfige +Sumpfbinse + +Nom +francais +: + +Eleocharide +obtuse + +, +Scirpe obtus +Nome italiano: +Giunchina ottusa + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F8/5C/37F85C05C45A4B13B873862FECE5511F.xml b/data/37/F8/5C/37F85C05C45A4B13B873862FECE5511F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ec31d8c22dc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F8/5C/37F85C05C45A4B13B873862FECE5511F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,833 @@ + + + +Biodiversity inventories in high gear: DNA barcoding facilitates a rapid biotic survey of a temperate nature reserve + + + +Author + +Telfer, Angela C +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +atelfer@uoguelph.ca + + + +Author + +Young, Monica R +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Quinn, Jenna +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Perez, Kate +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sobel, Crystal N +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sones, Jayme E +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Levesque-Beaudin, Valerie +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Derbyshire, Rachael +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Fernandez-Triana, Jose +CNC, Ottawa, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0425-0309 + + + +Author + +Rougerie, Rodolphe +Museum national d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France + + + +Author + +Thevanayagam, Abinah +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Boskovic, Adrian +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Borisenko, Alex V +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3061-3057 + + + +Author + +Cadel, Alex +University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada + + + +Author + +Brown, Allison +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Pages, Anais +Universite de Montpellier, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Castillo, Anibal H +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1537-0528 + + + +Author + +Nicolai, Annegret +EcoBio, Universite of Rennes, Rennes, France + + + +Author + +Glenn Mockford, Barb Mockford +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Bukowski, Belen +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Wilson, Bill +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Trojahn, Brock +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Lacroix, Carole Ann +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Herbarium, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Brimblecombe, Chris +University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand + + + +Author + +Hay, Christoper +University of Western Ontario, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Ho, Christmas +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Steinke, Claudia +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Warne, Connor P +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Garrido Cortes, Cristina +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Engelking, Daniel +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Wright, Danielle +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lijtmaer, Dario A +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Gascoigne, David +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Hernandez Martich, David +Universidad Autonoma de Santo Domingo DR, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic + + + +Author + +Morningstar, Derek +Myotistar, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Neumann, Dirk +SNSB, Zoologische Staatssammlung Muenchen, Munich, Germany + + + +Author + +Steinke, Dirk +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Marco DeBruin, Donna DeBruin +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Dobias, Dylan +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sears, Elizabeth +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Richard, Ellen +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Damstra, Emily +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Zakharov, Evgeny V +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Laberge, Frederic +University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Collins, Gemma E +University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand + + + +Author + +Blagoev, Gergin A +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Grainge, Gerrie +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Ansell, Graham +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Meredith, Greg +Grand River Conservation Authority, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Hogg, Ian +University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand + + + +Author + +McKeown, Jaclyn +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Topan, Janet +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Bracey, Jason +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Guenther, Jerry +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Sills-Gilligan, Jesse +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Addesi, Joseph +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Persi, Joshua +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Layton, Kara K S +The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia + + + +Author + +D'Souza, Kareina +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Dorji, Kencho +National Biodiversity Centre, Thimphu, Bhutan + + + +Author + +Grundy, Kevin +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Nghidinwa, Kirsti +Ministry of Environment and Tourism in Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia + + + +Author + +Ronnenberg, Kylee +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lee, Kyung Min +University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland + + + +Author + +Xie, Linxi +The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Lu, Liuqiong +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Penev, Lyubomir +Pensoft, Sofia, Bulgaria +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2186-5033 + + + +Author + +Gonzalez, Mailyn +Instituto de Investigacion de Recursos Biologicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogota, Colombia + + + +Author + +Rosati, Margaret E +Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, United States of America + + + +Author + +Kekkonen, Mari +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Kuzmina, Maria +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Iskandar, Marianne +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Mutanen, Marko +University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland + + + +Author + +Fatahi, Maryam +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Pentinsaari, Mikko +University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland + + + +Author + +Bauman, Miriam +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Nikolova, Nadya +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Ivanova, Natalia V +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Jones, Nathaniel +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Weerasuriya, Nimalka +The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Monkhouse, Norman +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lavinia, Pablo D +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +Jannetta, Paul +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Hanisch, Priscila E +Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales " Bernardino Rivadavia " (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina + + + +Author + +McMullin, R. Troy +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Herbarium, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Ojeda Flores, Rafael +Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico + + + +Author + +Mouttet, Raphaelle +ANSES, Laboratoire de la Sante des Vegetaux, Montferrier sur Lez, France + + + +Author + +Vender, Reid +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Labbee, Renee N +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Forsyth, Robert +New Brunswick Museum, Saint John, Canada +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9637-0158 + + + +Author + +Lauder, Rob +London Homeopathy, London, Canada + + + +Author + +Dickson, Ross +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Kroft, Ruth +rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Miller, Scott E +Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, United States of America + + + +Author + +MacDonald, Shannon +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Panthi, Sishir +Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal + + + +Author + +Pedersen, Stephanie +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Sobek-Swant, Stephanie +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Naik, Suresh +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Lipinskaya, Tatsiana +Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus + + + +Author + +Eagalle, Thanushi +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Decaens, Thibaud +Universite de Montpellier Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Kosuth, Thibault +Universite de Montpellier, Montpellier, France + + + +Author + +Braukmann, Thomas +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Woodcock, Tom +rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Roslin, Tomas +University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland + + + +Author + +Zammit, Tony +Grand River Conservation Authority, Cambridge, Canada + + + +Author + +Campbell, Victoria +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Dinca, Vlad +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +Peneva, Vlada +Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria + + + +Author + +Hebert, Paul D N +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada + + + +Author + +deWaard, Jeremy R +Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada +dewaardj@uoguelph.ca + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2015 + +3 + + +6313 +6313 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6313 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e6313 +1314-2828-3-e6313 +FFE5FF837519E9253D17614AFFA8FFC1 +574474 + + + + +Neottiura bimaculata Linnaeus, 1767 + + + +Notes +BOLD:AAK8332|BOLD:ACN7831 + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F8/5D/37F85D5B29D3543EAD4D71F236A09AA6.xml b/data/37/F8/5D/37F85D5B29D3543EAD4D71F236A09AA6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a039a4e1df9 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F8/5D/37F85D5B29D3543EAD4D71F236A09AA6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ + + + +The beetle fauna (Insecta, Coleoptera) of the Rawdhat Khorim National Park, Central Saudi Arabia + + + +Author + +Abdel-Dayem, Mahmoud S. +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6276-1740 +King Saud University Museum of Arthropods (KSMA), Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2460 Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia +mseleem@ksu.edu.sa + + + +Author + +Fad, Hassan H. +Entomology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt + + + +Author + +El-Torkey, Ashraf M. +Plant Protection Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt + + + +Author + +Elgharbawy, Ali A. +King Saud University Museum of Arthropods (KSMA), Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2460 Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia & Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Al Azhar University, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt + + + +Author + +Aldryhim, Yousif N. +King Saud University Museum of Arthropods (KSMA), Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2460 Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia + + + +Author + +Kondratieff, Boris C. +Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1177, Fort Collins, Colorado, U. S. A. 80523 + + + +Author + +Ansi, Amin N. Al +King Saud University Museum of Arthropods (KSMA), Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2460 Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia + + + +Author + +Aldhafer, Hathal M. +King Saud University Museum of Arthropods (KSMA), Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2460 Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +2017-02-07 + + +653 + + +1 +78 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.653.10252 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.653.10252 +1313-2970-653-1 +8ECC0674017A48588BE8DDD05C0D7CF6 +FFE87C63852C5772725FBE55FF95902D +269679 + + + + + +Parexochomus pubescens ( +Kuester +, 1848) + + + + +World distribution. + +Africa +: Africa. +Asia +: AE ( +Raimundo et al. 2007 +), AF, IL, IN, IQ, IR, SA, SY, YE. +Europe +: ES, FR, GR, IT. +North Africa +: DZ, EG, LY, MA, TN. + + + +General distribution. +AFR_ORR_PAL_SAR + + +Local distribution. + +AS, RI ( + +Fuersch +1979 + +). + + + +Collecting month and method. + +Common beetles that were collected by BV and VC on branches of + +Acacia ehrenbergiana +Acacia gerrardii + +, + +Calotropis procera + +and + +Lycium shawii + +throughout the year except in VI and VIII. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F9/32/37F932859D72F84513339B7470012390.xml b/data/37/F9/32/37F932859D72F84513339B7470012390.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3f965e26d24 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F9/32/37F932859D72F84513339B7470012390.xml @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ + + + +The ground beetle genus Bembidion Latreille in Baltic amber: Review of preserved specimens and first 3 D reconstruction of endophallic structures using X-ray microscopy (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Bembidiini) + + + +Author + +Schmidt, Joachim + + + +Author + +Michalik, Peter + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2017 + +662 + + +101 +126 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.662.12124 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.662.12124 +1313-2970-662-101 +0250ADB4740A4DB283FA92E3BA0363D2 +0250ADB4740A4DB283FA92E3BA0363D2 + + + + +Bembidion succini Giebel + + + + +Bembidium succini +Giebel, 1856: 64. + + + +Remarks on description and type material. + +B. succini +was described from Baltic amber and it is the first fossil species described in this genus to species level. Although it was mentioned in catalogues of Baltic amber fossils ( +Spahr 1981 +, +Keilbach 1982 +, +Alekseev 2013 +) subsequent researchers did not discuss the taxonomic position of this species. + + +The original description of +B. succini +, however, does not provide information to which genus of ground beetles this species actually belongs. +Giebel (1856) +noted that he was unable to recognize the diagnostic characters of the genus as well as of the whole +Bembidiini +tribe in this species. Mouth parts, the ventral side of body, elytral apex, and the legs were not visible to him, or he did not describe relevant characters of these body parts. The placement of this fossil in the genus +Bembidion +was solely based on the similarity of the external shape and proportions compared to some extant Central European species of the subgenus +Ocydromus +Clairville, 1806. The following citation represent the complete description provided by +Giebel (1856) +: + + +"Das einzige Bernsteinexemplar der Leipziger +Universitaetssammlung +ist kaum eine Linie lang und +naehert +sich +zunaechst +den lebenden +B. brunnicorne +, +B. perplexum +, ist jedoch noch +schmaeler +und gestreckter als diese, das Halsschild mit weniger convexen Seiten, die +Fluegeldecken +mit feinen Punktstreifen, das ganze Tierchen +hellgruen +. Leider umgibt eine Blase das Thierchen so, +dass +ich weder die Beine noch die Palpen deutlich erkennen kann und nur aus den +uebrigen +Formverhaeltnissen +auf die Gattung +Bembidium +schliesse" +( +Giebel 1856 +: 64). + + +Based on the few character states presented in this description it cannot be excluded that the name +B. succini +is given to a tiny (body length not even 2.3 mm) representative of the subtribe +Tachyina +or even to an Eocene species of a non- +Bembidiini +lineage. + + +Unfortunately, the taxonomic position of +B. succini +has remained ambiguous since all Baltic amber fossils of the Christian Gottfried Giebel collection are missing today. About 150 years ago, the fossil collection of Giebel was completely moved from the palaeontological collections of the Leipzig University to the University of Halle where it is now part of the geoscientific collections of the Institute of Geosciences and Geography. In 1973 parts of this collection were loaned to the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences for further study and were probably returned to Halle in 1998, however, details of the transfer of the material as well as its current location are unknown ( +Henniger 2011 +). It is also unknown whether the loaned material contained amber fossils. In any event, nowadays not a single amber fossil ex collectio Giebel exists in the University of Halle (Norbert Hauschke, Institute of Geosciences and Geography, University of Halle, pers. comm.)! Thus, at the current state of knowledge it remains unclear whether the amber fossils of the Giebel collection are fully lost or only stored well hidden, e.g., within sealed containers in the stack-rooms of the University of Halle ( +Henniger 2011 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/F9/5F/37F95F211061210982442DB76EBBA5B0.xml b/data/37/F9/5F/37F95F211061210982442DB76EBBA5B0.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c68d30e432a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/F9/5F/37F95F211061210982442DB76EBBA5B0.xml @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + +Revision of Therophilus s. s. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae) from Thailand + + + +Author + +Sharkey, Michael J. +Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, S 225 Agricultural Science Center North, Lexington, KY 40546 - 0091, USA + + + +Author + +Stoelb, Stephanie A. C. +Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, S 225 Agricultural Science Center North, Lexington, KY 40546 - 0091, USA + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2012 + +2012-05-31 + + +27 + + +1 +36 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.27.2832 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.27.2832 +1314-2607-27-1 +E27D322A8D0140F0A247D1B44D8F5E30 +7967FF9A916BFF9FFF881B7FFF97184B +574783 + + + + +Therophilus crenulisulcatus van Achterberg & Long +Figure 9 + + + + +Therophilus crenulisulcatus +van Achterberg and Long 2010 +[RMNH, type examined] Vietnam. + + + +Diagnosis. +Tegula black, concolorous with mesoscutum. 2nd submarginal cell height subequal to petiole length. Hind tibia mostly pale, melanic apically and with a subbasal melanic band or lateral spot. Pronotum entirely melanic. MT2 with weak short longitudinal striae restricted to transverse depression, or entirely smooth. + + +Figure 9. + +Therophilus crenulisulcatus + +van Achterberg & Long +a +lateral habitus +b +Wings +c +anterodorsal head +d +lateral head and mesosoma +e +dorsal head and mesosoma +f +dorsal propodeum and MT1-3 + + + + +Comments. +The Thai specimen has a slightly longer ovipositor, otherwise very similar to type. + + +Distribution. +Distribution map can be found at http://purl.org/thaimap/crenulisulcatus + +Material examined +. ♀. 8481 [QSBG] Thailand, Doi Phahompok NP, Kiewlom1: Montane Forest, +20.0575°N +, +99.1425°E +, MT, 7-14.viii.2007. http://purl.org/taxabank/T.crenulisulcatus + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FA/5F/37FA5FE5EE8002FA1FFB0D159DE56747.xml b/data/37/FA/5F/37FA5FE5EE8002FA1FFB0D159DE56747.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d64036da22f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FA/5F/37FA5FE5EE8002FA1FFB0D159DE56747.xml @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Grypocentrus albipes Ruthe, 1855 + + + +Distribution +England, Scotland + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FA/97/37FA97F5FDAF0A9F89F958E73DB681C6.xml b/data/37/FA/97/37FA97F5FDAF0A9F89F958E73DB681C6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a5e35d01344 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FA/97/37FA97F5FDAF0A9F89F958E73DB681C6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ + + + +Catalogue of the hymenopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. Part VI. Formicidae. + + + +Author + +Smith, F. + +text + +1858 +British Museum + +London + + + +http://antbase.org/ants/publications/8127/8127.pdf + +book +8127 +C86CFDBF-61D9-48EE-9C2E-325FC0462B10 + + + + +14. +Oecodoma rugosa +. B.M. + + + +Female. Length 3 1/2 lines. - Pale red: the head roughened, +with several short spines on the lateral margins of the vertex, two irregular ridges running backwards from the insertion of the antennae, with irregular elevations or points between; the ocelli distinct; the teeth of the mandibles and the eyes black. Thorax ovate, not narrowed behind as in the workers; the prothorax with an acute tooth on each side, and also one just above the in- sertion of each anterior coxa; the mesothorax with a few short scattered hairs on the disk; the metathorax with an acute tooth on each side near the insertion of the petiole of the abdomen; legs of moderate length, not elongated as in the workers. Ab- domen: the upper surface irregular, with numerous pointed elevations and scattered, short, stiff hairs. + + + +Hab +. Brazil. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FA/AC/37FAACE9F86CC6EDBD547E19EDB65C96.xml b/data/37/FA/AC/37FAACE9F86CC6EDBD547E19EDB65C96.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3b7dce15a10 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FA/AC/37FAACE9F86CC6EDBD547E19EDB65C96.xml @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ + + + +Flora Helvetica - Fabaceae + + + +Author + +Konrad Lauber + + + +Author + +Gerhart Wagner + + + +Author + +Andreas Gygax + +text + + +2018 +Haupt Verlag + +Bern + + + +Flora Helvetica + + + +37 +400 + + + +book chapter +978-3-258-08047-5 + + + + + +Trifolium dubium +Sibth. + + + + + +Artbeschreibung: +Staengel +5-15(-30) cm, niederliegend, meist verzweigt. +Teilblaetter +nicht +ueber +1 cm +lang, +meist alle kurz gestielt +(mittleres am +laengsten +). + +Nebenblaetter +breit-eifoermig +. +Blueten +hellgelb, +3-4 mm +lang, Stiele +kuerzer +als die +Kelchroehre +. Fahne +/- ganzrandig. +Bluetenstand +nur +0,5-1 cm +dick, 3-15(-25) +bluetig + +. Griffel +hoechstens +1/3 so lang wie die Frucht. + + + + +Bluetezeit +: 5-9 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz: +Grasplaetze +, +Wegraender +, in +waermeren +Lagen / kollin(-subalpin) / CH + + + + +Verbreitung global: +Urspruenglich +mediterran + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F +frisch; Feuchtigkeit stark wechselnd (mehr als ++/- +2 Stufen) +Lichtzahl LhellSalzzeichen--
Reaktionszahl Rschwach sauer bis neutral (pH 4.5-7.5)Temperaturzahl Tunter-montan und ober-kollin
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +maessig +naehrstoffarm +bis +maessig +naehrstoffreich + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K + +subozeanisch bis subkontinental (mittlere Luftfeuchtigkeit, +maessige +Temperaturschwankungen und +maessig +tiefe Wintertemperaturen) +
+ + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Zweifelhafter Klee +, +Kleiner Klee +Nom +francais +: + +Trefle +douteux + +Nome italiano: +Trifoglio dubbio + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FA/EA/37FAEA3334B071075D5CEF5F447CF551.xml b/data/37/FA/EA/37FAEA3334B071075D5CEF5F447CF551.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ef3e3094969 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FA/EA/37FAEA3334B071075D5CEF5F447CF551.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +A taxonomy review of Oreoderus Burmeister, 1842 from China with a geometric morphometric evaluation (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Valgini) + + + +Author + +Li, Sha + + + +Author + +Ricchiardi, Enrico + + + +Author + +Bai, Ming + + + +Author + +Yang, Xingke + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2016 + +552 + + +67 +89 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.552.6096 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.552.6096 +1313-2970-552-67 +E772CBC4E2A445F1963175C2AEC32051 + + + + +Taxon +classification Animalia Coleoptera Scarabaeidae + + + + +Oreoderus arrowi Ricchiardi, 2001 +Fig. 6 +A-C + + + + + +Oreoderus +arrowi + +Ricchiardi, 2001: 521. + + + +Type material examined. + +Holotype, ♂, S. China, 10-14.VII.1990, Jinghong, Prov., Yunnan, leg. S. +Becvar +, (MCSN). + + + +Additional material examined. +P.R. CHINA: 1♂, Yunnan, Xihuangbanna, Jinghong, 650m, 1958.VII.7, leg. MengXuwu, IOZ(E)902175; 1♂, Yunnan, Xihuangbanna, Damenglong, 650m, 1958.VII.11, leg. ZhengLeyi, IOZ(E)902176; 1♂, Yunnan, Xihuangbanna, Damenglong, 650m, 1958.VII.11, leg. ZhengLeyi, IOZ(E)902177; 1♂, Yunnan, Xihuangbanna, Mengzhe, 870m, 1958.IX.7, leg. Wang Shuyong, IOZ(E)902178; 1♂, Yunnan, Xihuangbanna, Xiaomengyang, 850m, 1958.IX.2, leg. MengXuwu, IOZ(E)902179; 1♂, Yunnan, Xihuangbanna, Xiaomengyang, 1400m, 1957.X.4, leg. Wang Shuyong, IOZ(E)902187; 1♀, Yunnan, Naban River Nature Reserve, Mengsong, Danuoyou, 2007.XII.14, 770m, Danuoyou IV A, 14.XII.2007, leg. A. Weigel, 22.20699°N, 100.63761°E (trap), leg. A. Weigel, IOZ(E)1945434, (IZAS). + + +Description of female. + +Length 8.4 mm; width 2.8mm. Color: light brown to brown. Head: clypeus anteriorly rounded, sharp in the apex, with erected setae. Frons covered with testaceous scales. Ocular canthus short and broad, covered with same scales. Antenna with 10 segments, club much longer than antennomeres 2-7. Pronotum: widest at base, lateral margin sinuate. Surface densely punctate, covered with testaceous scales. Carinae and lateral carinae sharp, highly prominent, ending before middle of pronotum. Scutellum: triangular, rounded at apex, covered with testaceous scales. Elytra: coarsely punctate, covered with testaceous scales. +Propygidium +: apparently longer than in male, hind margin rounded. Propygidial spiracles moderately el +evated +. Pygidium: narrower than in male, with thick lied down scales. Venter: coarsely and densely punctate with testaceous scale. Sternite V twice longer than Sternite IV; Sternite VI much narrower than male. Legs: slender, covered with testaceous scales except protibia. Protibia tridentate, tooth blunter than in male; meso- and metatibia with a spine on the outer margin. Tarsomeres much shorter than in male, covered with short setae. + + + +Distribution. +China: Yunnan. + + +Figure 6. Habitus of +Oreoderus arrowi +(female). A dorsal view B pygidium C female genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FB/26/37FB26D6CA345F2EB479DF84D78FF828.xml b/data/37/FB/26/37FB26D6CA345F2EB479DF84D78FF828.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3a87a661534 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FB/26/37FB26D6CA345F2EB479DF84D78FF828.xml @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@ + + + +The millipede tribe Brachyiulini in the Caucasus (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae) + + + +Author + +Vagalinski, Boyan +Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2 Yurii Gagarin Street, 1113, Sofia, Bulgaria +boyan_vagalinski@excite.com + + + +Author + +Golovatch, Sergei I. +Institute for Problems of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky pr. 33, Moscow 119071, Russia + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2021 + +2021-08-30 + + +1058 + + +1 +127 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1058.68628 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1058.68628 +1313-2970-1058-1 +654932353DDB4E1B8848EAB69F2C20FD +61FB9E86BEE45968AAC868B21AF7ED86 + + + + +Megaphyllum (Megaphyllum) spathulatum (Lohmander, 1936) + + + + +Chromatoiulus (Chromatoiulus) spathulatus +Lohmander, 1936: 104-109, figs 80-84. + + +Chromatoiulus (Chromatoiulus) spathulatus +: +Attems 1940 +: 306. + + +Chromatoiulus spathulus +(sic!): +Lang 1959 +: 1791. + + +Megaphyllum spathulatum +: +Golovatch 1990b +: 364; 1992: 381; + +Lazanyi +and Vagalinski 2013 + +: 87, fig. 18b-d; +Kokhia and Golovatch 2018 +: 41; +2020 +: 206. + + + +Material examined + + +(SMNG): + +Russia +: RU12-86, +1 ♂ +, +1 ♀ +, +Republic +of +Adygea +, +Kamennomostkiy +, northern end of +Dakhovskaya Canyon +near quarry, limestone cliffs, +44.2844°N +, +40.1778°E +, + +430 m +a.s.l. + +, +24.VIII.2012 +, +F. Walther +leg. + + +; + +RU12-051, +3 ♂♂ +, +1 juv. +, +Dakhovskaya +, limestone cliffs NW of, +44.2439°N +, +40.1758°E +, + +800 m +a.s.l. + +, +13.VIII.2012 +, +F. Walther +leg. + +; + +33579, +1 ♂ +, +Republic +of +Adygea +, +Mount Shibaba +, +21.V.2004 +, + +K. +Voigtlaender + +leg. + + + + +Diagnosis. + +Differs from its only congener known from the Caucasus, + +M. + +( +s. str. +) + +Megaphyllum hercules + +, mainly by the colour pattern: body with a light yellow to ochre dorsum divided by a black axial line, vs. body uniformly dark with an orange to dark red mid-dorsal line in + +M. hercules + +; and by the promere significantly tapering all the way to a narrowly rounded apex, vs. the same having mostly parallel side margins, ending with a flat apex in + +M. hercules + +. + + + +Previous records from the Caucasus. + +Western Caucasus (unspecified type locality) ( +Lohmander 1936 +). + + + +General distribution. +WCIS? + + +Remark. +This species seems to be a narrow local endemic of the northwestern foothills of the Caucasus Major, showing preferences for limestone terrain. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FB/D9/37FBD99864A25854B4F57D24109947BC.xml b/data/37/FB/D9/37FBD99864A25854B4F57D24109947BC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..278673d9e44 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FB/D9/37FBD99864A25854B4F57D24109947BC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,237 @@ + + + +Taxonomy of Sierola Cameron (Hymenoptera, Bethylidae) from China with three new species + + + +Author + +Wang, Chung-Hong +State Key Lab of Rice Biology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China + + + +Author + +He, Jun-Hua +State Key Lab of Rice Biology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China + + + +Author + +Chen, Xue-Xin +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9109-8853 +0000 - 0002 - 9109 - 8853 State Key Lab of Rice Biology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China +xxchen@zju.edu.cn + +text + + +Journal of Hymenoptera Research + + +2021 + +2021-08-24 + + +84 + + +405 +415 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.84.68189 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.84.68189 +1314-2607-84-405 +454070AD3D12429E80232DB12F67DDE0 +6038F0A083FD5ECFB0A1DA7F80A9FEB0 +5349493 + + + + +Sierola leleji +sp. nov. + + + + +Figure 2 + + + +Material examined. + + + + +Holotype + +: + +China +• +♀ +; +Zhejiang Province +, +Changshan +; +28°54.42'N +, +118°31.05'E +; +Aug. 1980 +; +Sh.J. Yang +leg.; +No. +202016914 + +. + + +Paratypes + +: +China +• +3♀ +; same collection data as for preceding; No. 202016912, No. 202016913, No. 202016916 + +. + + + +Description. + + +Holotype +: + +(Fig. +2A +). +Female. +Body length = 1.60 mm. Length of forewing = 1.15 mm. +Color +. Body light castaneous. Mandible light castaneous. Antenna yellow, darker distad. Legs yellow, coxae and femora yellowish castaneous. Forewing hyaline; veins almost colorless; prestigma and pterostigma pale yellowish nearly colorless. + +Pubescence +. + +Body cover with short sparse setae, denser in dorsal surface of propleuron and mesopectus. Antenna with dense appressed setae. Forewing with dense setae; R2c and 1Cu2c with sparse setae. +Head +(Fig. +2B-E +). Head longer than wide, WH/LH = 0.82; DH/LH = 0.57. Mandible moderately narrow at base, distinctly broader on apical half, ventral margin distinctly concave; not twisted, outwardly coriaceous; apex of mandible vertical, with four equally strong teeth. Median clypeal lobe weakly protuberant with apex rounded; median clypeal carina slightly extending back into frons, not recurved apically in lateral view. Antennomeres II-VI in ratio of 1.63: 0.91: 0.81: 1.03: 1.0 in length and respectively 1.53, 0.94, 0.68, 0.80, 0.80 +x +wide; antennal scrobal carina absent. Frons and vertex coriaceous with shallow punctures separate 1.5-4.0 +x +its diameter. Eye protuberant. WF/LE = 1.09; LE/DEV = 1.24. Anterior ocellus distinctly far away from supra-ocular line; POL/AOL = 1.53; OOL/WOT = 1.40; DAO = 0.03 mm. Vertex crest straight; sides of head behind eyes slightly outcurved. Occipital carina absent. Malar space absent. Gena coriaceous; ventral area of gena elevated in lateral view. +Mesosoma +(Fig. +2F, G +). DT/LT = 0.37. Pronotum coriaceous; dorsal pronotal area shorter than wide, with shallow punctures; pronotum slightly sloping in lateral view. Mesoscutum coriaceous with shallow punctures; parapsidal signum weak; mesoscutellum coriaceous with shallow punctures, mesoscutellar fovea present. Metanotum coriaceous, 0.12 +x +mesoscutellum. Metapectal-propodeal complex coriaceous; prespiracular propodeal depression oblong; metapostnotum without median shiny longitudinal stripe; lateral marginal carina complete; anterior metapleural area smooth; metapleural line with three pits. Propleuron coriaceous. Mesopectus coriaceous; subalar impression present; mesopleural pits present; ventral surface of mesopectus with fovea near mesocoxa; mesodiscrimen weak. +Forewing +(Fig. +2H +). Rs2v 0.85 +x +Rs&M2v; R12v intersect apical portion of Rs2v at right angle; length of pterostigma 0.53 +x +its width. + +Metasoma +. + +Smooth. Metasomal sternum I with median longitudinal carina; metasomal sternum III with +'V' +shape depression medially. + + + +Figure 2. + +Sierola leleji + +sp. nov., holotype, female +A +habitus lateral +B +head, frontal view +C +mandible +D +antenna +E +head, lateral view +F +pronotum, dorsal view +G +mesosoma (except prothorax), dorsal view +H +forewing. Scale bars: 0.15 mm ( +A, B, E-H +); 0.05mm ( +C, D +). + + + + +Variation. +Body length 1.60-1.90 mm; length of forewing 1.15-1.47 mm. Body light castaneous to castaneous; mandible light castaneous to dark castaneous. WH/LH 0.80-0.83; DH/LH 0.56-0.57; POL/AOL = 1.45-1.69; OOL/WOT = 1.27-1.40; DAO = 0.03-0.04 mm. + +Male. +Unknown. + + + +Etymology. + +This species is named in honor of the well-known Russian entomologist, an expert of +Aculeata +, Professor Arkady S. Lelej for celebrating his 75-anniversary. + + + +Host. + +Larvae of + +Haplochrois theae + +(Kusnezov, 1916). + + + +Distribution. +China (Zhejiang). + + +Comments. + +This species is similar to the species + +Sierola shimotsukeana + +Terayama, 2006 for the shape of head. But it can be distinguished by having 1M2c nearly rectangular, metapostnotal-propodeal disc coriaceous, and mandible light castaneous while + +S. shimotsukeana + +having 1M2c oval, posterior area of metapostnotal-propodeal disc smooth medially, and mandible black. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FC/87/37FC87C67A3DAFCF974F6DCBC85CA55A.xml b/data/37/FC/87/37FC87C67A3DAFCF974F6DCBC85CA55A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9bc9e632e2b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FC/87/37FC87C67A3DAFCF974F6DCBC85CA55A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + +Checklist of British and Irish Hymenoptera - Ichneumonidae + + + +Author + +Broad, Gavin R. + +text + + +Biodiversity Data Journal + + +2016 + +4 + + +9042 +9042 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9042 +1314-2828-4-9042 + + + + +Exochus erythronotus (Gravenhorst, 1820) + + + + +Ichneumon erythronotus +Gravenhorst, 1820 + + +concinnus +Holmgren, 1858 + + +pumilus +Holmgren, 1873 + + +rufidorsum +( +Szepligeti +, 1898, +Amesolytus +) + + +ghigii +Ferriere +, 1929 + + + +Distribution +England + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FC/FB/37FCFB0D6812524C82002B0D5E1A2C1F.xml b/data/37/FC/FB/37FCFB0D6812524C82002B0D5E1A2C1F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..48136531741 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FC/FB/37FCFB0D6812524C82002B0D5E1A2C1F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,1452 @@ + + + +Systematics of Slovenian Dahlica Enderlein, 1912, subgenus Brevantennia Sieder, 1953 (Lepidoptera, Psychidae) + + + +Author + +Rekelj, Jurij +Struzevo 35, 4000 Kranj, Slovenia; jurij. rekelj @ gmail. com +jurij.rekelj@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Predovnik, Zeljko +Ob zeleznici 82, 3313 Polzela, Slovenia; predovnik 1 @ gmail. com +predovnik1@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Huemer, Peter +https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0630-545X +Tiroler Landemuseen Betriebsges. m. b. H., Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen, Krajnc-Str. 1, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria; p. huemer @ tiroler-landesmuseen. at +p.huemer@tiroler-landesmuseen.at + + + +Author + +Lopez-Vaamonde, Carlos +https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2278-2368 +INRAE, URZF, Zoologie Forestiere, Orleans, France & IRBI, UMR 7261, CNRS-Universite de Tours, Tours, France; carlos. lopezvaamonde @ inrae. fr +carlos.lopezvaamonde@inra.fr + +text + + +Nota Lepidopterologica + + +2022 + +2022-06-17 + + +45 + + +207 +232 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/nl.45.81674 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/nl.45.81674 +2367-5365-45-207 +3DB0F27F4AE1420FA0E695A3A19E6DBE +4FB365026B6552788136F247BC19B761 + + + + +Dahlica (Brevantennia) santicensis (Sieder, 1957) +stat. rev. + + + + +Figs 3a, b +, 4a-c +, 5 +, 8a, b +, 9 +, 10 +, 11 + + + + +Solenobia (Brevantennia) santicensis +Sieder, 1957: 108. + + +Brevantennia gorskikotarica += +Brevantennia gorskikotarica +Weidlich, 2015, +syn. nov. +Type locality: Mrzla Vodica, Crni Lug, Gorski Kotar, Croatia. + + + +Material examined. + + + +Lectotype + +. + +Labelled as follows: 1. White label bordered in red: Det. L. +Sieder 1957 +, +Sol. Brevant +. + +Dahlica santicensis + +Sied. Typus +♂ +; 2. White label: 18.5.56, Warmb.-Villach, +Kaernten +, leg. L. Sieder; 3. Red label: +LECTOTYPUS +, +Dahlica (Brevantennia) santicensis +, (Sieder, 1957), designated by Rekelj J. et al. 2022 (Fig. +3a +). + + + +Figure 3. + +D. santicensis + +. +a. +Lectotype +male with original labels in NHMW; +b. +Syntype +male (mislabelled as +neotype +), larval case with original labels in NHMW. + + + +The +lectotype +is deposited in the NHMW [Hauptsammlung - +Psychidae +]. + + +The total number of +syntypes +is unknown (in the original description Sieder unfortunately does not specify the number of specimens of the type material), but it must be larger than those we found in the museum (NHMW) in +Vienna +: +Austria +• +Kaernten +, Warmbad-Villach; +1♂ +, +11.v.1956 +; +3♂♂ +, +16.v.1956 +; +6♂♂ +, +17.v.1956 +; +5♂♂ +, +18.v.1956 +; +1♂ +, +19.v.1956 +; +1♂ +, +26.v.1956 +; +1♂ +, +29.v.1956 +; +2♂♂ +, +26.iv.1957 +; +1♂ +, +25.iv.1959 +; +1♂ +, +1.v.1959 +; +1♂ +, +8.v.1959 +; 1 larval case, +18.v.1956 +[labeled as a "Sack-Typus +♂ +" - Fig. +3b +]; 6 larval cases, (iv/v)1956; 1 larval case, +28.iv.1957 +; 1 larval case, +28.v.1957 +; all leg. L. Sieder; coll. NHMW. + + + +Other material. + + +Austria +• +1♂ +; + +Kaernten + +, +Warmbad-Villach +; +16.v.1956 +, leg. +L. Sieder + +; coll. PCMP • + +9♂♂ +, +10♀♀ +, with larval cases; + +Kaernten + +, +Warmbad-Villach +; + +540 m + +; +28.iv.2013 +(e.p. +28.-30.iv.2014 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; + +5♂♂ +genit. prep. + +No + +:184-188, +Rekelj +; coll. PCJR + +• + +12♂♂ +, +2♀♀ +, with larval cases; + +Kaernten + +, +Faaker Zee +; + +540 m + +; +21.iv.2013 +(e.p. +25-30.iv.2014 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; coll. PCJR • + +1♂ +, +1♀ +, with larval cases; + +Kaernten + +, +Loibltal +; + +700 m + +; +17.iii.2012 +(e.p. +20.iii.2012 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; DNA barcode sample: +1♂ +TIPSY620-12; coll. PCJR • + +2♂♂ +, with larval cases; +Osttirol +, +Lengberg +; + +800m + +, +4.iv.2010 +e.l.; leg. +H. Deutsch + +; DNA barcode sample: +1♂ +TIPSY155-12; + +1♂ +genit. prep. + +No + +: 234, +Rekelj +; coll. PCJR. +Slovenia + +• + +1♂ +, with larval case; +Gorenjska +, +Gozd Martuljek +; + +740 m + +; +7-9.v.2002 +; leg. +M. Lasan + +; + +genit. prep. + +No + +: 313, Rekelj; coll. PCML + +• + +20♂♂ +, +5♀♀ +, with larval cases; same locality; + +710 m + +; +28.iv.2013 +, (e.p. +1-5.v.2013 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; coll. PCJR • + +26♂♂ +, +3♀♀ +, with larval cases; same locality; +10.iv.2014 +(e.p. +17-22.iv.2014 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; + +5♂♂ +genit. prep. + +No + +: 214-218; +Rekelj +coll. + +PCJR • + +1♂ +, with larval case; +Gorenjska +, + +Ratece + +; + +850 m + +; +10.iv.2014 +(e.p. +22.iv.2014 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; coll. PCJR • + +1♂ +, with larval case; +Julijske Alpe +, +Mala Mojstrovka +; + +1600 m + +; +17.iv.2011 +(e.p. +1.v.2011 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; DNA barcode sample: TIPSY125-12; + +1♂ +genit. prep. + +No + +: 233, +Rekelj +; coll. PCJR + +• + +1♂ +, with larval case; same locality; +9.v.2020 +(e.p. +11.v.2020 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; + +genit. prep. + +No + +: 380, Rekelj; coll. PCJR + +• + +2♀♀ +, with larval cases, several empty larval cases; +Julijske Alpe +, +Zgornja Trenta +, +Mlinarica +; + +1100 m + +; +9.v.2020 +, (e.p. +10.v.2020 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; coll. PCJR • + +8♂♂ +, +12♀♀ +, with larval cases; +Julijske Alpe +, +Strmec na Predelu +; + +1015 m + +; +21.v.2017 +; (e.p. +25-30.v.2017 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; coll. PCJR • + +27♂♂ +, +2♀♀ +, with larval cases; same locality; +9.v.2020 +, (e.p. +9-15.v.2020 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; + +5♂♂ +genit. prep. + +No + +: 284-287, +Rekelj +; coll. PCJR • 3 larval cases with + +♂ +exuvia, 1 larval case with + +♀ +exuvia; +Cerkno +, +Kladje +; + +780m + +; +21.vi.2017 +; leg. +J. Rekelj + +; coll. PCJR • + +2♂♂ +, with larval cases, several old cases; +Zgornja Sorica +[road to +Soriska +Planina]; + +940 m + +; +23.iii.2019 +, (e.p. +1-9.iv.2019 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; coll. PCJR • + +1♂ +, +3♀♀ +, with larval cases, several empty larval cases; +Naklo +, + +Gradisce + +; + +380 m + +; +16.iv.2016 +(e.p. +17.iv.2016 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; coll. PCJR • + +9♂♂ +, +7♀♀ +, with larval cases; + +Kamnisko +Savinjske Alpe + +, + +Crnivec + +pod + +Plesivcem + +; + +900 m + +; +14.iv.2013 +(e.p. 20., +25.iv.2013 +); DNA barcode sample + +: +1♂ +TIPSY672-15; + +5♂♂ +genit. prep. + +No + +: 228-2232, +Rekelj +; leg. +J. Rekelj + +; coll. PCJR • + +6♂♂ +, with larval cases, same locality; +9.iii.2014 +(e.p. +20-22.iii.2014 +); leg. +J. Rekelj + +; coll. PCJR • + +1♂ +, +5♀♀ +, with larval cases; + +Kamnisko +Savinjske Alpe + +, +Raduha +, +Strmec +[ +Pecovnik +]; + +730 m + +; +19.iv.2014 +(e.p. +20-24.iv.2014 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; DNA barcode sample: +1♂ +TIPSY736-15, +1♀ +TIPSY734-15; coll. +PCZP +• +1♀ +, with larval case, + +3 adult +larvae; same locality; +4.iv.2015 +(e.l.-e.p. +14.iv.2015 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; coll. +PCZP +• + +3♀ +, with larval cases; +Pohorje +, +Oplotnica +, +Cezlak-Lukanja +[ +Oplotnica +creek]; + +789 m + +; +29.iii.2014 +(e.p. +4-6.iv.2014 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; DNA barcode sample: +1♀ +TIPSY733-15; coll. +PCZP +• + +1♀ +, with larval cases; same locality; +28.iii.2015 +(e.l. +22.4.2014 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; coll. +PCZP +• + +1♀ +, with larval cases; same locality; +11.iv.2015 +(e.l. +21.iv.2014 +); leg +Z +. +Predovnik +; coll. +PCZP + +• + +1♀ +, with larval case; +Mrzlo +polje [ +Gracnica +creek]; + +392 m + +; +28.iii.2012 +(e.p. +5.iv.2012 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; DNA barcode sample: +1♀ +, TIPSY718-15; coll. +PCZP +• + +1♀ +, with larval case; same locality; +13.iii.2014 +(e.p. +18.iii.2014 +); leg +Z +. +Predovnik +; coll. +PCZP + +• + +2♂ +, with larval cases; +Kalce +[ +Logatec +], + +Hrusica + +, + +Lanise + +; + +640 m + +; +23.iii.2012 +(e.p. 2.iv., +7.iv.2012 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; DNA barcode sample: +1♂ +TIPSY628-12; coll. +PCZP +• + +1♂ +, with larval case; +Notranjska +, +Nanos +; + +1250 m + +; +31.v.2004 +, leg +J. Skyva +; genit. prep. + +No + +: 367, +Rekelj +; coll. PCJR • 27 old larval cases, + +Zelimlje + +, + +Kurescek + +[Stara +zaga +]; + +680 m + +; +14.i.2012 +; leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; coll. +PCZP +• + +2♂♂ +, with larval cases; same locality; +23.iii.2012 +(e.l.-e.p. +2.iv.2012 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; DNA barcode sample: +1♂ +TIPSY629-12; + +1 ♂ +genit. prep. + +No + +:118, +Rekelj +; coll. +PCZP + +• + +2♂♂ +, with larval cases; same locality; +5.iv.2013 +(e.p. +15-16.iv.2013 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; + +1♂ +genit. prep. + +No + +:122, +Rekelj +; coll. +PCZP + +• + +6♂♂ +, +4♀♀ +, with larval cases; same locality; +12.iv.2014 +(e.p. 2., 13., 14., 15., +18.iv.2013 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; + +4♂♂ +genit. prep. + +No + +:119-122 +Rekelj +; coll. +PCZP + +• + +7♂ +, +1♀ +, with 61 larval cases; +Ribnica +, +Retje +; + +843 m + +; ( +15.iv.2013 +(e.p. +25-27.iv.2013 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; + +4♂♂ +, genit. prep. + +No + +:103, 115-117, +Rekelj +; coll. +PCZP + +• +44♂♂ +, +58♀♀ +, with 150 larval cases, fresh exuviae + +♂ +, +4 adult +larvae; same locality; +12.iv.2014 +(e.l.-e.p. +12-22.iv.2014 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; DNA barcode sample: +1♂ +TIPSY742-15; + +6♂ +, genit. prep. + +No + +:104-107, 113,114, +Rekelj +; coll. +PCZP + +• + +2♂♂ +, with 8 larval cases; same locality; +30.iii.2015 +(e.p. +9-10.iv.2015 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; coll. +PCZP +and PCJR • 15 larval cases, exuviae + +♂♂ +and +♀♀ +, +Podplanina +, +Trava +; + +660 m + +; +7.iv.2012 +; leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; coll. +PCZP +• + +2♀ +, with larval cases; same locality; +12.iv.2014 +(e.p. 16.iv., +21.iv.2014 +), [ca.10 minutes long copula: +1♂ +Retje +x +1♀ +Trava +]; leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; DNA barcode sample: +1♀ +TIPSY741-15; coll. +PCZP +• Several old cases, exuviae + +♂ +and +♀ +; + +Paski +Kozjak + +[Mountain Lodge]; + +1028 m + +; +17.ii.2019 +; leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; coll. +PCZP +• +2♂ +, +7♀ +, with larval cases; +13.iv.2019 +(e.p. +14.iv-22.iv. 2019 +); leg. +Z +. Predovnik; + +coll. +PCZP +• 17 old larval cases; +Mislinja +, +Tolsti +vrh [Polenica creek]; + +805 m + +; +23.xii.2018 +; leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; coll. +PCZP +• + +4♂ +, +7♀ +, with larval cases; same locality; +13.iv.2019 +(ex.p. +16.iv-22.iv.2019 +); leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; + +coll. +PCZP +• A few old larvae cases; + +Sodrazica + +, +Zg. Globel +, +Ravni +vrh; + +728 m + +; +30.iii.2015 +; leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; + +coll. +PCZP +• 3 old larvae cases; + +Velike +Lasce + +, +Mala Slevica +; + +608 m + +; +15.iii.2015 +; leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; + +coll. +PCZP +• 2 old larvae cases; +Ribnica +, +Breg +pri +Ribnici na Dolenjskem +; + +494 m + +; +30. iii.2015 +; leg. + +Z +. Predovnik + + +; coll. +PCZP +. + + + +Diagnosis. + +(Figs +9 +, +10 +) + +D. santicensis + +can easily be distinguished from the wide- cloaking scaled species: + +D. pinkeri + +(class III-IV), + +D. adriatica + +(class IV-V), + +D. herrmanni + +(class IV-V) and + +D. estrela + +(class V-VI) by the narrower cloaking scales (class II-III), and also by the different genital index. + + + +D. santicensis + +(0.64-0.80) differs from + +D. reliqua + +(0.94-0.956), + +D. styriaca + +(0.99-1.14) and + +D. ilonae + +(1.19-1.24), by a much lower genital index and more distinct pattern on the forewings. + + + +D. triglavensis + +is distinguished by smaller class of cloaking scales (I-II), more unclear and less noticeable pattern and much lighter ground colour of forewings. Fringes are lighter creamy silver, the apex of the forewing in the area of stigma is creamy and noticeably brighter. + + + +D. santicensis + +is most similar to the + +D. siederi + +by the genital index and class of cloaking scales, but + +Solenobia siederi + +is distinguished by lighter (yellowish white) pattern on fore wings, noticeably brighter (creamy silver) apex of the forewing in the stigma area and by the brighter (whitish silver) fringes on forewing. + + + +Redescription. + +Male +(Figs +3a +, +4a +). Exp. 10 to 13 mm, forewing length 4.5-6 mm. Specimens very variable in size and colouring. +Head +: Vertex and frons (Fig. +8a, b +) covered with yellowish grey to grey dense hairs, labial palpi small, covered with grey hairs. Eyes small, black, ocelli lacking. Antennae relatively short, in most specimens not exceeding half length of the costal margin of the forewings, with 27-34 segments (n = 25), including scapus and pedicellus, filiform (in original description Sieder states 30-34 segments). Ventral to the first third, usually covered with broad, light creamy scales, with three to four short tines, especially when the vertex hairs are light creamy. If the hairs are darker, yellowish grey, then the antennae scales are (in first third) mixed with darker scales. In the second third, the scales become darker and gradually to the apex narrower and sparser. + +Forewings + +: (Figs +3a +, +4a +, +10 +) length 2.3 times exceeding its width (n = 4). The ground colour of forewings greyish brown. Pattern (bright spots) light grey to greyish white, distinct and well expressed, more strongly than at the other narrow scales +Dahlica subgenus Brevantennia +species. Discal and anal spot less well expressed or no recognizable. Cloaking scales with two to four, mostly with three short tines, classified into class II and III. Fringes silvery greyish, coloured strongly at the base, long, with two to four tines. Forewing venation with nine veins, originates from the discoidal cell. Vein pcu less well expressed, accessory cell present (n = 5). + +Hindwings + +: Colour greyish brown. Fringes medium length, with two to three tines, brightly coloured than the basic colour of hindwings. Venation with six veins originates from the discoidal cell. Veins m2 and m3 very variable, separated or approximated at the base, sometimes also fused for a short distance - class IV, V or VI. All three classes of venation differ greatly, depending on the location, or even the year of collecting specimens. +Thorax +: Colour greyish brown, in brighter specimens grading into creamy brown. Legs greyish brown, foretibia without epiphysis. Midtibia with one pair of spurs, hindtibia with two pairs. All legs with five tarsal segments. +Abdomen +: Dark brown colour, becoming lighter towards the genitalia. Terminal segments covered with creamy or pale yellow hairs. +Genitalia +: Typical for +Dahlicini +. Tegumen relatively broad, with a shallow groove at the front. Valva narrow and long. Dorsal margin of valva towards the top slightly curved, apex slightly extended, without any special characteristics. Clavus long, pointed and curved at the end. Phallus quite short, curved, without specifics. Genital index 0.64-0.80, average 0.72 (n = 52). The index varies depending on location, as expressed in Fig. +5 +. + + + +Figure 4. + +D. santicensis + +. +a. +Fresh adult male resting on rock, Gozd Martuljek; +b. +Fresh adult female transmitting pheromones, Gozd Martuljek; +c. +Mixed forest with Scots pine, natural habitat of + +D. santicensis + +, Gozd Martuljek, 740 m. + + + +Female +(Fig. +4b +). Wingless, ground colour pale yellow, with broad, light brown plates dorsally. Freshly hatched specimens having a slight greenish appearance. Dimensions: three mm long and less than one mm wide. Eyes small, black, ocelli lacking. Antennae short with three to seven segments (including scapus and pedicellus). Tibiae of forelegs without epiphysis, all legs usually with three-segmented tarsi, fused tarsi in two segments rare but present. 7th abdominal segment densely covered with creamy white hairs. + + +Female exuvia pale brown colour, curved - typical for the subgenus +Dahlica Brevantennia +. + + + +Larval cases. + +Typical for +Dahlicini +, cases are small, more or less round and slightly rounded on the edges. They are composed of finely chewed dark brown particles of bark, small pieces of soil and brighter pieces of sand. There is an inevitable slight deviation in composition of larval cases as a result of the different surfaces available in the natural habitat. Male larval cases are 5.5-6.5 mm long and 2 mm wide; female cases are smaller, 4.5-5 mm long and 1.5 mm wide. + + + +Morphological variation. + +We noticed considerable variation between populations and also between specimens from the same population, reflected in the colour of the dense vertex hairs, intensity of wing colouration and the genital index. Northern populations (Warmbad-Villach, Strmec na Predelu, Gozd Martuljek) have mostly yellowish-grey coloured vertex hairs, but among those we also found about 10% grey-coloured specimens. Their abundance increases towards the south and in southern localities (Retje, Trava) only grey-coloured specimens can be found. Differences between dense vertex hair colours are shown in Fig. +8a, b +. + +Intensity of wing colouration is also quite variable, but it seems that is not location dependent. Within one population (Gozd Martuljek locality) we found specimens with intensive colouration alongside more pale specimens. + +Differences related to the geography of the locality are also noticeable in the genital index. Higher values were found in moths from northern locations of a more alpine character. Southern locations produce lower values, but they do not fall linearly proportionate to the latitude and the values are overlapping. Comparison of genital indexes with locations is expressed in Fig. +5 +. + + + +Figure 5. +Graphical representation of genital indexes on different localities of + +D. santicensis + +. + + + +Morphologically, the nearest species to + +D. santicensis + +is + +D. siederi + +(Weidlich, 2015), which has the same class of cloaking scales (II-III) and shows almost the same genital index (Fig. +9 +). + + + +Synonymy. + +Weidlich (2015) +described + +D. gorskikotarica + +from Croatia - Gorski Kotar. We have examined the following material from the type locality: Croatia • 8 larvae, 1 old exuviae ♀, Gorski Kotar, Crni Lug, Mrzla Vodica; 880 m; 18.x.2015; leg. J. Rekelj; coll. PCJR • 14♂♂, 8♀♀, with larval cases, same locality; 2.iv.2017 (e.p. 6-10.iv.2017); leg. J. Rekelj, 5♂♂ genit. prep. +No +: 370-374, Rekelj; coll. PCJR • 19♂♂, 6♀♀, with larval cases; Gorski Kotar, Crni Lug, Vela Voda; 747 m; 2.iv.2017 (e.p. 6-10.iv.2017); leg. J. Rekelj; 5♂♂ genit. prep. +No +: 375-379, Rekelj; coll. PCJR. + + +In addition, we have DNA barcoded one specimen from the type series (DNA barcode sample: LEATC004-13) from Mrzla Vodica. This specimen falls within the same BIN (BOLD:AAQ1227) as + +D. santicensis + +(Suppl. material 1: Table S1). In addition, we found no diagnostic morphological character (forewing colouration and pattern, class of cloaking scales and genital index) to distinguish + +D. gorskikotarica + +from Slovenian populations of + +D. santicensis + +. Both molecular and morphological data show that + +D. gorskikotarica + +is a synonym of + +D. santicensis + +: + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FD/51/37FD512DB4A7D139D4D4AA7C5C3170F4.xml b/data/37/FD/51/37FD512DB4A7D139D4D4AA7C5C3170F4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9fda9fd398e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FD/51/37FD512DB4A7D139D4D4AA7C5C3170F4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + +A taxonomic review of Korean species of the AthetaThomsonsubgenusMicrodota Mulsant & Rey, with descriptions of two new species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae) + + + +Author + +Lee, Seung-Gyu + + + +Author + +Ahn, Kee-Jeong + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2015 + +502 + + +61 +97 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9420 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9420 +1313-2970-502-61 +2139C45FE4664FBFA9E8853622E3B250 + + + +Taxon classification Animalia Coleoptera Staphylinidae + + + +Atheta (Microdota) muris Sawada, 1974 +Figs 8, 32, 41, 50, 59, 68, 77 + + + + +Atheta (Amidobia) muris +Sawada, 1974: 176. + + +Atheta (Microdota) muris +: +Smetana 2004 +: 387 (as valid species). + + + +Material examined. +SOUTH KOREA: Chungnam Prov.: 1 ex., Buyeo-gun, Oesan-myeon, Gaedeok-ri, Mt. Wolmyeongsan, 1.vi.2000, US Hwang, HJ Kim, sifting; 26 exx., Daejeon-si, Chungnam National Univ., 13.v.2002, JS Park, sifting; 7 exx., Daejeon-si, Yuseong-gu, Chungnam National Univ., 26.ix.2002, SM Choi, JH Choi, sifting; 1 ex., Daejeon-si, Mt. Sikjangsan, Secheon park, 17.vii.2000, HJ Kim, mushroom; 1 ex., Gongju-si, Mt. Gyeryongsan, 23.vi.2000, HJ Kim, near stream; 1 ex., Hongseong-gun, Gwangcheon-eup, Oseosan, 20.vi.1999, HJ Kim, near stream; Gangwon Prov.: 6 exx., Pyeongchang-gun, Odaesan, Jeokmyeolbogung, 8.vii.1998, KJ Ahn, mushroom; Gyeonggi prov.: 6 exx., Namyangju-si, Sudong-myeon, Oebang-ri, Mt. Chukryeongsan, 13.ix.1999, US Hwang, HJ Kim, sifting. + + +Description. + +Length 1.4-1.9 mm. Body (Fig. 8) slender and parallel-sided, more or less flattened dorso-ventrally; surface distinctly glossy, densely pubescent, with fine microsculpture. Body usually yellowish brown; head and abdominal segments +V-VII +dark brown to black; pronotum slightly paler than elytra. Head. Subquadrate, approximately 1.0-1.1 times wider than long, widest across eyes, slightly narrower than pronotum; eyes moderate in size and prominent, about 1.0-1.2 times longer than tempora; gular sutures moderately separated, diverged basally; infraorbital carina complete; cervical carina complete. Antennae (Fig. 32) dilated apically; antennomeres 1-3 elongate, 1 longest, 4-10 transverse, 11 longer than wide, slightly shorter than preceding two combined. Mouthparts. Labrum transverse, anterior margin emarginate; two lateral sensilla and about 8 macrosetae present on each side of midline; +α-sensillum +setaceous, slightly longer than +ε-sensillum +, +β- +and +γ-sensilla +reduced. Mandibles asymmetrical, pointed apically, about 1.5-1.6 times as long as basal width; right one with small internal tooth, anterior margin serrulate; prostheca developed. Lacinia of maxilla with seven spines in distal comb, two isolated spines present; maxillary palpus elongate, with pubescence and long setae; palpomere 1 smallest and about 1.8-2.0 times as long as wide, 2 about 2.5-2.7 times longer than wide, 3 slightly longer than 2, about 2.2-2.5 times as long as wide, 4 digitiform, filamentous sensilla reaching to basal half. Labium with ligula divided into two lobes in basal half; two medial setae narrowly separated; two basal pores close; lateral pseudopores and two real pores present on prementum; labial palpus elongate, with many setulae; palpomere 1 largest and dilated basally, about 1.5-1.7 times longer than wide, with +γ-setula +close b-setula, 2 shortest, about 1.4-1.6 times longer than wide, 3 about as long as 1, about 3.0 times longer than wide. Thorax. Pronotum transverse, approximately 1.3 times wider than long, widest at apical third; pubescence directed anteriorly in midline. Metanotal scutum with one long seta and about two short setae on each side of midline; mesocoxal cavities narrowly separated, mesoventral process pointed at apex, longer metaventral process; length ratio of mesoventral process, isthmus and metaventral process 15:8:6. Elytra slightly wider than pronotum; elytron approximately 1.5-1.6 times longer than wide, pubescence directed postero-laterally; postero-lateral margin almost straight; hind wings fully developed; flabellum composited one setose lobe. Legs. Slender and long, with dense pubescence and setae; tibia with two spurs at apex; length ratio of tarsomeres 18:20:20:44 (protarsus); 20:23:24:24:45 (mesotarsus); 31:31:31:30:53 (metatarsus); one empodial seta present, shorter than claw. Abdomen. Parallel-sided, widest at middle; surface distinctly glossy and densely pubescent, with fine and imbricate microsculpture; macrochaetal arrangement of tergites +II-VI +01-02-12-12-13; male tergite VIII (Fig. 41) with 4 macrosetae on each side of midline, posterior margin truncate; male sternites +V-VII +with many pores in anterior margin, VIII with 8 macrosetae on each side of midline, posterior margin broadly rounded, with long marginal setae; posterior margin of female tergite VIII subtruncate; posterior margin of female sternite VIII slightly emarginate at middle, long and short marginal setae; minute setae present in median region. Genitalia. Median lobe (Figs 50, 59) oval, apical process abruptly convergent at apex in ventral aspect. Apical lobe of paramerites (Fig. 68) elongate and subparallel-sided with four setae; a- and b-setae longer than c- and d- setae. Spermatheca (Fig. 77) with duct relatively long, coiled apically. + + + +Distribution. +Korea (South) and Japan. + + +Remarks. +Some specimens were found on mushrooms in forests. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FD/BA/37FDBA25E3403BCA72EB180DFA417C52.xml b/data/37/FD/BA/37FDBA25E3403BCA72EB180DFA417C52.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..860eecd9ce4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FD/BA/37FDBA25E3403BCA72EB180DFA417C52.xml @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ + + + +Order Carnivora + + + +Author + +Wilson, Don E. + + + +Author + +Reeder, DeeAnn + +text + + +2005 +The Johns Hopkins University Press + +Baltimore + + + +Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 1 + + + +532 +628 + + + +book chapter +0-8018-8221-4 +10.5281/zenodo.7316519 + + + + + +Halichoerus +Nilsson 1820 + + + + + + + +Halichoerus +Nilsson 1820 + +, +Skand. Faun. Dagg. Djur., Vol. 1: 376 + +. + + + + +Type Species: + +Halichoerus griseus +Nilsson 1820 + + + + + +Synonyms: + +Halychoerus +Boitard 1842 + +. + + + + +Species and subspecies: +1 species with 2 subspecies: + + +Species + +Halichoerus grypus +(Fabricius 1791) + + + +Subspecies + +Halichoerus grypus +subsp. +grypus +Fabricius 1791 + + + +Subspecies + +Halichoerus grypus +subsp. +macrorhynchus +Hornschuch and Schilling 1851 + + + + + +Discussion: +Mohr (1952) +described successful mating in captivity between + +Pusa hispida + +and + +Halichoerus grypus + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FD/C3/37FDC3A5251D9221B757D4ED4847E746.xml b/data/37/FD/C3/37FDC3A5251D9221B757D4ED4847E746.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..378de174a80 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FD/C3/37FDC3A5251D9221B757D4ED4847E746.xml @@ -0,0 +1,440 @@ + + + +Info Flora Schweiz - Fabaceae + + + +Author + +Info Flora + +text + +2021 +2023-10-20 +Info Flora Schweiz + +Geneve + + + +https://www.infoflora.ch/de/flora/fabaceae.html + +url + + + + + +Trifolium resupinatum +L. + + + + + +Wende-Klee + + + + +Art ISFS: 427400 Checklist: 1047660 +Fabaceae +Trifolium +Trifolium resupinatum L. + + + +Bestimmungsschluessel + + + +Zusammenfassung + + + + +Artbeschreibung + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: +Staengel +10-60 cm +hoch, aufsteigend bis aufrecht, nicht wurzelnd. +Blaetter +3 +zaehlig +, +Teilblaetter +verkehrt-eifoermig +, fein +gezaehnt +, 1-3,5 cm lang. + +Blueten +rosarot, umgewendet (mit +abwaerts +gerichteter Fahne) + +, +/- sitzend, +4-8 mm +lang, in lang gestielten, halbkugeligen, +1-2 cm +dicken +Koepfen +, die von einem +1 mm +langen Hochblattkranz umgeben sind. + +Kelch nach dem +Verbluehen +blasig aufgetrieben, +druesig +behaart. + + + + + +Bluetezeit + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: 4-8 + + +Standort und Verbreitung in der Schweiz + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: +Aecker +, +Schuttplaetze +, +Wegraender +, als Futterpflanze kultiviert und z.T. +eingebuergert +/ kollin-montan(-subalpin) / CH + + + + +Verbreitung global + +(nach +Lauber & al. 2018 +) + +: Mediterran + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte + +(nach +Landolt & al. 2010 +) + +3w + 44+44 + 4.t.2n=14,16 + + + + + +Oekologie + + +Lebensform Therophyt + +Lebensraum Lebensraum +nach +Delarze & al. 2015 + + + + + + + + +
4.0 - Kunstrasen
+ + + +fett + +Dominante Art, welche das Aussehen des Lebensraumes +mitpraegt + +Charakterart +Weniger strikt an den Lebensraum gebundene Art + + + + + +Oekologische +Zeigerwerte nach +Landolt & al. (2010) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Bodenfaktoren + +Klimafaktoren + +Salztoleranz +
Feuchtezahl F +maessig +feucht; Feuchtigkeit stark wechselnd (mehr als ++/- +2 Stufen) +Lichtzahl LhellSalzzeichen1
Reaktionszahl Rneutral bis basisch (pH 5.5-8.5)Temperaturzahl Twarm-kollin
+Naehrstoffzahl +N + +naehrstoffreich + +Kontinentalitaetszahl +K +subkontinental (niedrige relative Luftfeuchtigkeit, grosse Temperaturschwankungen, eher kalte Winter)
+ + + + +Nomenklatur + + + + +Gueltiger +Name ( +Checklist 2017 +) + +: + +Trifolium resupinatum +L. + + + + + + +Volksname Deutscher Name: +Wende-Klee +, +Persischer Klee +Nom +francais +: + +Trefle +renverse + +Nome italiano: +Trifoglio risupinato + + + + +Uebereinstimmung +mit anderen Referenzwerken + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
RelationNomReferenzwerkeNo
= +Trifolium resupinatum L. + + +Checklist 2017 + +427400
= +Trifolium resupinatum L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2001 + +1120
= +Trifolium resupinatum L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2012 + +632
= +Trifolium resupinatum L. + + +Flora Helvetica 2018 + +632
= +Trifolium resupinatum L. + + +Index synonymique 1996 + +427400
= +Trifolium resupinatum L. + + +Landolt 1977 + +1715
= +Trifolium resupinatum L. + + +Landolt 1991 + +1429
= +Trifolium resupinatum L. + + +SISF/ISFS 2 + +427400
= +Trifolium resupinatum L. + + +Welten & Sutter 1982 + +884
+ + + += Taxon stimmt mit akzeptiertem Taxon +ueberein +( +Checklist 2017 +) <Taxon ist im akzeptierten Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) enthalten> Taxon +enthaelt +(neben anderen) auch das akzeptierte Taxon ( +Checklist 2017 +) + + + + + +Status Indigenat +: Neophyt: nach der Entdeckung von Amerika in der Region aufgetreten (nach 1500) + + + + +Liste der +gefaehrdeten +Pflanzen IUCN + +(nach +Walter & Gillett 1997 +): + +Nein + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FE/ED/37FEEDC8A4E2606E34FEEA7E1EC8B5D2.xml b/data/37/FE/ED/37FEEDC8A4E2606E34FEEA7E1EC8B5D2.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0b654b72126 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FE/ED/37FEEDC8A4E2606E34FEEA7E1EC8B5D2.xml @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ + + + +Descriptions of new species of hymenopterous insects collected by Mr. A. R. Wallace at Celebes. (Part Formicidae) + + + +Author + +Smith, F. + +text + + +Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology + + +1860 + +5 + + +57 +93 + + + + +http://128.146.250.117/pdfs/2592/2592.pdf + +journal article +2592 +308AABE0-116E-4CA6-A153-B2A689E71E23 + + + + +4. +Ponera unicolor +. + + + +P. ochracea; antennis subfuscis, alis hyalinis; tibiis tarsisque fuse is. + + +Male. Length 4 lines. Entirely ochraceous, with the antennas and leg* "lightly fuscous; the mesothorax with two oblique impressed lines meeting in the middle of its disk: the wings hyaline and iridescent, the nemires and stigma rufc-fuscous. The node of the peduncle subglobose; a deep constriction between the first and second segment * of the abdomen, and a slighter one between the second and thin!; the node of the pedunele with a tooth at its base beneath. + + +Hab. Makassar. + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/37/FF/87/37FF8791ACB316C77E143B6B4F0E442C.xml b/data/37/FF/87/37FF8791ACB316C77E143B6B4F0E442C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..78815443ebd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/37/FF/87/37FF8791ACB316C77E143B6B4F0E442C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ + + + +Preliminary study on the diversity of Orthoptera from Kuala Belalong Field Studies Centre, Brunei Darussalam, Borneo + + + +Author + +Tan, Ming Kai + + + +Author + +Abdul Wahab, Rodzay bin Haji + +text + + +Journal of Orthoptera Research + + +2018 + +27 + + +2 + + +119 +142 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.24152 + +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jor.27.24152 +1937-2426-2-119 + + + + +1. +Asarcogryllacris (Pseudolarnaca) sp. +Fig. 13 +A-E + + + +Remarks.- + +Our single specimen (a male) resembles the drawing of the habitus of +A. genualis +(Walker, 1869) from Borneo. The abdominal apex (particularly the medial apical sclerotized processes of ninth abdominal tergite) also resembles that in +Gorochov (2005) +. It clearly differs from the only subcongener, +A. (P.) nigroscutata +(Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1888) from Java, by color patterns and abdominal apex. + + + + \ No newline at end of file