From 30617f19ff61510cbcd4530c382f0e18e6d2e2dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ggserver Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:46:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add updates up until 2025-06-12 16:41:46 --- .../87/03CA8784FFB8FFED54D3ACC4FDFCA2BD.xml | 173 ++++ .../87/03CA8784FFBCFFE054ABAF70FDAEA24F.xml | 797 ++++++++++++++++++ .../87/03CA8784FFBDFFEC54FDA98CFBBBA188.xml | 138 +++ 3 files changed, 1108 insertions(+) create mode 100644 data/03/CA/87/03CA8784FFB8FFED54D3ACC4FDFCA2BD.xml create mode 100644 data/03/CA/87/03CA8784FFBCFFE054ABAF70FDAEA24F.xml create mode 100644 data/03/CA/87/03CA8784FFBDFFEC54FDA98CFBBBA188.xml diff --git a/data/03/CA/87/03CA8784FFB8FFED54D3ACC4FDFCA2BD.xml b/data/03/CA/87/03CA8784FFB8FFED54D3ACC4FDFCA2BD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d2933a33dea --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/CA/87/03CA8784FFB8FFED54D3ACC4FDFCA2BD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ + + + +Oculogryphus, A Remarkable New Genus of Fireflies from Asia (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) + + + +Author + +JENG, M. - L. + + + +Author + +ENGEL, MICHAEL S. + + + +Author + +YANG, P. - S. + +text + + +American Museum Novitates + + +2007 + +2007-12-12 + + +3600 + + +1 +20 + + + + +http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1206/0003-0082%282007%293600%5B1%3AOARNGO%5D2.0.CO%3B2 + +journal article +10.1206/0003-0082(2007)3600[1:OARNGO]2.0.CO;2 +0003-0082 +5389057 + + + + + +Oculogryphus +Jeng, Engel, and Yang + +, + + + + +new genus + + + + +TYPE +SPECIES: + +Oculogryphus fulvus +Jeng + +, +new species +(fig. 1). + + + + +DIAGNOSIS: The new genus can be readily diagnosed by the following combination of characters: partially exposed head; 11-articled, filiform antennae; large compound eyes that are emarginate posteriorly and approximate ventrally; strongly curved and crossing mandibles with pointed apex; narrowly explanate pronotal margins and close pronotal hypomeron; epipleuron restricted to basal half of elytra; eight abdominal ventrites (including exposed sternite of aedeagal sheath); abdominal tergites not lobed; absence of photogenic organs and tibial spurs; and progressively shortened tarsomeres 1–4. These characters intermingle diagnostic features of +Luciolinae +, +Rhagophthalminae +, and +Ototretinae +, but none of the three subfamilies possess all of these characters. + + + + +Figs. 2–3. + +Oculogryphus fulvus + +, +new genus and species +, male, head and pronotum. +2. +Dorsal aspect. +3. +Lateral aspect. + + + + +DESCRIPTION: +Male. +Body shape elongate oval, somewhat depressed and fully winged. Head (fig. 2) largely exposed from pronotum when retracted, intermediate between prognathous and hypognathous. Compound eyes very large, occupying most of head laterally and with hind margins remarkably emarginate (fig. 3); compound eyes separated from each other in dorsal aspect by about one-third head width and approximate ventrally (fig. 4). Vertex flat or slightly depressed. Antennal calli (convexity above antennal sockets: see +DuPorte, 1960 +) weakly convex; antennal socket elongate elliptical in shape, moderately distant from labrum, with antennifer in lower margin of socket; space between antennal sockets slightly convex, about as broad as one-half width of socket; antennae 11-articled, filiform, reaching elytral base when in repose; scape and pedicel elongate, longer in former; flagellar articles cylindrical and densely setose. Lower margin of clypeus broadly and roundly emarginate. Labrum sclerotized, notched medioapically. Mandibles well developed, strong and nearly uniform in diameter to near tip, curved and pointed apically. Maxillae with cardines approximate each other at base; maxillary palpi with four palpomeres, labial palpi with three palpomeres, both with slightly dilated, thick, terminal palpomeres and budlike apices, without thin ridge or tooth on inner side. Ventral margin of occipital foramen emarginate, reaching basal one-third of head length. Gula very narrow. Posterior tentorial pits immediately behind labrum, at about middle of head. Margins of hypostoma convergent toward base (fig. 4). + + +Pronotum (fig. 2) transverse, subparallelsided, punctate, and pubescent throughout; mostly opaque although translucent on margins; anterior margin broadly rounded, without clear anterolateral angles; central disc evenly convex (fig. 3), with median sulcus; apical and lateral explanate margins very narrow; posterolateral angles large and nearly orthogonal; posterior margin weakly sinuate, broadly impressed on inner base of posterior angles. Hypomeron close in frontal aspect, with inner margin attending anterolateral margin of pronotum. Prosternum (fig. 4) with an inverted Y-shaped, short and broad intercoxal process. Mesoventrite separated from mesopleurites by a clear suture (fig. 4). Metaventrite notched medioapically. Elytra elongate oval, well paired along midline; carinae weak; lateral explanate margins narrow; surface covered with fine setae. Humeral area of elytra (fig. 5) roundly folded toward marginal costa; epipleura narrow, deeply folded, barely visible laterally, extending from humeral base to basal one-third of elytra. Venation of hind wing (fig. 8) with reduction of crossveins; radial cell incomplete; MP +3+4 +and CuA +1+2 +not connected by crossveins and not branched. Legs long and slender. Front trochantins setiferous but glabrous in middle legs. Mesocoxae moderately separated from each other; metacoxae narrowly separated from each other. Tibial spurs absent. Tarsi (fig. 9) about as long as their tibiae in middle and hind legs; tarsomeres progressively shorter from 1–4, cylindrical and slender in 1–3; tarsomere 4 with tarsal pulvilla and lobed, widely open in dorsal cleft (fig. 9); pretarsal claws simple. + + + +Figs. 4. + +Oculogryphus fulvus + +, +new genus and species +, male, head and thorax, ventral aspect. + + +Abdomen with eight ventrites (fig. 11, S2– 9), reaching elytral apices. Spiracles in lateral folded, membranous pleurites, not visible ventrally. Tergites invisible in ventral aspect, not lobed and with rounded posterior angles. Apical margin of ventrite 7 (5 S8) simple; exposed portion of V8 (5 S9) semirounded. Aedeagal sheath basically symmetric, broad and short; T9 and T10 individually distinct; S9 broad at base. Male genitalia modified trilobed, bilaterally symmetric; much smaller than aedeagal sheath; median lobe uniformly broad, arched upward in apical half; parameres broad in lateral aspect and forming a Vshaped band in dorsal aspect; basal piece large and symmetric. + + +Fig. 5. + +Oculogryphus fulvus + +, +new genus and species +, male, basal half of elytra, lateral aspect. + + + +Female. +Unknown. + + + +ECOLOGY: Unknown; see Discussion, below. + + + +ETYMOLOGY: The new genus-group name is a combination of the Latin terms +oculus +(meaning ‘‘eye’’) and +gryphus +(meaning ‘‘griffin’’, originally a mythological creature from Asia adopted by the Greeks and with a mix of features from a lion and an eagle. The idea of the griffin perhaps stemmed from ancient people’s seeing the exposed remains of + +Protoceratops: +Mayor, 2000 + +). The name is a reference to the characteristic eyes and the ambiguous, subfamilial identity of the new genus. The name is masculine. + + + + +DIVERSITY: The +type +species is presently the only known member of the genus. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/CA/87/03CA8784FFBCFFE054ABAF70FDAEA24F.xml b/data/03/CA/87/03CA8784FFBCFFE054ABAF70FDAEA24F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5cb184e2054 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/CA/87/03CA8784FFBCFFE054ABAF70FDAEA24F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,797 @@ + + + +Oculogryphus, A Remarkable New Genus of Fireflies from Asia (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) + + + +Author + +JENG, M. - L. + + + +Author + +ENGEL, MICHAEL S. + + + +Author + +YANG, P. - S. + +text + + +American Museum Novitates + + +2007 + +2007-12-12 + + +3600 + + +1 +20 + + + + +http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1206/0003-0082%282007%293600%5B1%3AOARNGO%5D2.0.CO%3B2 + +journal article +10.1206/0003-0082(2007)3600[1:OARNGO]2.0.CO;2 +0003-0082 +5389057 + + + + +KEY TO +LAMPYRID +GENERA IN EAST AND SOUTHEAST ASIA AND +AUSTRALIA + + +(males only) The considered area ranges from +India +in the west and +Australia +in the east, zoogeographically including the whole Oriental region (OR, including Indian subcontinent, Himalayas, Indochina and Malay Peninsula, +Taiwan +, +Philippines +, Borneo, and Sunda Islands), the +Palaearctic region +in East Asia (PA, including +Eastern Eurasia +continent, +Korean Peninsula +, and +Japan-Ryukyu Archipelago +), +New +Guinea +, +Pacific islands +, and +Australia +of the +Australian region +(AU). +The +proposed key, following +Crowson’s +definition of +Lampyridae +, provides an account of the 34 lampyrid genera presently documented in this area (inclusive of the new genus). +It +is partly based on or modified from +Ballantyne and Lambkin (2001 +, +2006 +, for couplets 3–10), +Maulik (1921) +and +Wittmer (1979) +(for couplets 22– 24), and +Wittmer (1937 +, for couplet 33). +It +should be noted that the key is tentatively proposed, especially for the nontypical lampyrids (couplet 20 and below). +With +the exception of + +Oculogryphus + +, most of the nontypical lampyrid genera were transferred from +Drilidae +and placed under +Ototretinae +or +Ototretadrilinae +by various authors. +Most +of them are poorly known at present, usually with no more than revisional works on restricted zoogeographic faunas (e.g., + +Drilaster + +of +Ryukyu Archipelago +by +Kawashima et al., 2005 +). +Characters +for these genera are provided herein based on examination of the +type +species (*), together with some additional exemplar species (**), on some nontype species only (#), or in a few cases on references alone ( +1 +). + + + + +Figs. 10–13. + +Oculogryphus fulvus + +, +new genus and species +, male. +10. +Abdominal tergite 8, dorsal aspect. +11. +Abdominal visible sternites, right half, ventral aspect. +12. +Aedeagal sheath, dorsal aspect. +13. +Male genitalia, dorsal (A), ventral (B), and lateral (C) aspects. + + + + + + +1. Abdomen with six visible sternites (ventrites) 2 + + +— Abdomen with more than six ventrites... 12 + + + + + +2. Antennae serrate and depressed; coloration of elytra pink to various degrees..................... + +Pristolycus +Gorham (OR, PA) + + + + +— Antennae filiform or somewhat moniliform; coloration of elytra never pink........ 3 + + + + + +3. Compound eyes with posterior margin clearly emarginate +4 +......... + +Bourgeoisia +Olivier + +(OR) and + +Luciola cowleyi +Blackburn (AU) + + + + +— Compound eyes never or insignificantly emarginate posteriorly.................. 4 + + + + + +4. Elytron with superimposed costa arising from humeral area and extending to near apex...... + +Curtos +Motschulsky (OR, PA) + + + + +— Elytron without clear humeral costa; if present, not particularly more imposed than other costae.......................... 5 + + + + +5 +Including + +Luciola flavicollis +Macleay + +, + +L. orapallida +Ballantyne + +, and + +L. nigra +Olivier + +from +Australia +, + +L. kuroiwae +Matsumura + +from Ryukyu, + +L. trilucida + +from +Taiwan +, and some undetermined species from Indochina Peninsula. + + + + +5. Median apical area of abdominal tergite 8 narrowed and deflexed, closely approaching the incurved and hooked apex of ventrite 6; some species with acute and conspicuous anterior angles on pronotum........................ + +Pygoluciola +Wittmer (OR) + + + + +6 + +Hotaria + +was treated as a subgenus by +McDermott (1966) +, or a synonym of + +Luciola + +by Kawashima et al. (2003). Indeed, + +Hotaria + +and + +Luciola + +s.str. +(based on + +L. italica + +) shared many morphological characters in males as well as flightless females which have complete elytra but absence of hind wings. +Ballantyne and Lambkin’s (2001 +, +2006 +) phylogenetic analyses suggest a close relationship of these two groups. However + +Luciola + +currently recognized is a highly diverse group, containing more than 300 species worldwide, and definitely needs a redefinition. Accordingly we have kept + +Hotaria + +as a valid name until its status is decided phylogenetically. + + +— Median apical area of abdominal tergite 8 not narrowed or deflexed; anterior angles of pronotum never acute.............. 6 + + + +4 +Some species of + +Lampyroidea + +have compound eyes with an emarginate posterior margin in males, but the genus does not occur in the area and is therefore excluded from the key + + +. + + + + +6. Apices of parameres of genitalia largely or totally concealed by median lobe, not visible in ventral aspect.................. 7 + + +— Apices of parameres of genitalia barely or not concealed by median lobe, visible in ventral aspect......................... 10 + + + + + +7. Apex of elytra deflexed........................... + +Pteroptyx +Olivier (OR, AU) + + + + +— Apex of elytra not deflexed............ 8 + + + + + +8. Median carina of V6 present............................. + +Colophotia +Dejean (OR) + + + + +— Median carina of V6 absent........... 9 + + + + + +9. Photogenic organs on V6 bipartite; aedeagal sheath bearing paraprocts.......................... + +Pyrophanes +Olivier (OR, AU) + + + + + +— Photogenic organs on V6 one-pieced; aedeagal sheath without paraprocts................... some + +Luciola +species +5 + +(PA, OR, AU) + + + + + +10. Elytra broad, with lateral explanate margin of elytra quite broad in elytral base, unambiguously visible in humeral area dorsally; usually at least two elytral costae well developed; hypomeron with frontal margin at angle of 30–45 degrees with pronotal lateral margin laterally............. 11 + + + +— Elytra more or less elongate, with lateral explanate margin of elytra very narrow in humeral basal area, thus partially concealed by humerus dorsally; elytral costae usually poorly developed, or weakly developed; hypomeron with frontal margin at angle of 70–90 degrees with pronotal lateral margin laterally... + +Luciola +Laporte de Castelnau (OR, PA, AU) + +and + +Hotaria +Yuasa + +6 +(PA) + + + + + + +11. Abdominal tergite 8 asymmetric bilaterally............... + +Luciola ovalis + +group (OR) + + + + +— Abdominal tergite 8 symmetric bilaterally... + +Atyphella + +(including s.g. + +Pygatyphella +, AU + +) + + + + + + +12. Antennae bipectinate..................... + +Cyphonocerus +Kiesenwetter (PA, OR) + + + + +— Antennae not bipectinate............ 13 + + + + +13. Head fully covered by pronotum in dorsal aspect when fully retracted.......... 14 + + +— Head largely or partially exposed from pronotum when fully retracted, eyes always visible at least partially in dorsal aspect...... 19 + + + + +14. Spiracles at or approximate to lateral edges of ventrites, visible in ventral aspect..... 15 + + +— Spiracles on dorsally folded part of ventrites, not visible in ventral aspect......... 17 + + + + + +15. Tibial spurs present; abdominal photogenic organs vestigial, represented by small spots, while compound eyes large and separated from each other by less than compound-eye width in ventral aspect........................... + +Lampyris +Geoffroy (PA, OR) + + + + +— Tibial spurs absent; photogenic organs usually well developed as transverse stripes, if reduced and spotlike, then accompanied with small and widely separated compound eyes.......................... 16 + + + + + +16. Compound eyes moderate in size, separated from each other by distance of about an eye width in ventral aspect; pronotum flat or slightly convex in apical one-third to half length of pronotum, with central disc occupying basal three-fifths to two-thirds of pronotal length; antennae never filiform; photogenic organs reduced in diurnal species.... + +Pyrocoelia +Gorham (OR, PA) + + + + + +— Compound eyes large in size, approximate ventrally; pronotum distinctly convex in apical half to two-thirds of pronotal length, forming a light bulb–like convexity together with pronotal central disc which as long as or shorter than convex area; antennae serrate, filiform, or pectinate; photogenic organs well developed + +Diaphanes +Motschulsky (OR, PA) + + + + + + + +17. Compound eyes large and deeply emarginate in posterior margin, approximate each other ventrally; antennae short, with small projected sensory appendages on several terminal flagellar articles; pronotal pleurite subtriangular, about as long as height............. + +Lamprigera +Motschulsky (OR, PA) + + + + +— Compound eyes small and not deeply emarginate in posterior margin, widely separated ventrally; antennae long, serrate, compressed or pectinate, without those small appendages as above; pronotal pleurite subtrapezoid, longer than height................ 18 + + + + + +18. Male genitalia with a pair of slender appendages originating from apical region of parameres; parameres not forming a basal projection in dorsal aspect; pretarsal claws simple on all legs......................... + +Vesta +Laporte de Castelnau (OR, PA) + + + + + +7 + +Lucidotopsis +McDermott + +is essentially a synonym of + +Lucidina + +s.str. +and will be discussed in a forthcoming paper. The monotypic genus + +Mimophotinus +Pic + +, based on + +M. angustatus +Pic + +from +Vietnam +, was also allied to nontypical + +Lucidina + +. Their relationship will need further investigation. + + + +— Male genitalia with a pair of lateral appendages along median lobe; parameres forming a basal + +projection in dorsal aspect; pretarsal claws of fore- and midlegs each with a ventral projection on one claw (in many species)............... + +Lucidina +Gorham + +7 +(OR, PA) + + + + + +19. Elytra dehiscent, not fully covering abdomen.......................... 20 + + +— Elytra well matching along central suture, fully covering abdomen or nearly so....... 21 + + + + + +20. Antennae somewhat pectinate; terminal antennal article not reduced.............................. + +Ototretadrilus +Pic + +# +(OR) + + + + +— Antennae not pectinate, more or less depressed; terminal antennal article reduced.......................... + +Baolacus +Pic + + +1 + +(OR) + + + + + +21. Both maxillary and labial palps greatly lobed, much wider than antennae.......... 22 + + +— Both maxillary and labial palps of normal size, not wider than antennae............ 25 + + + + +22. Antennae unipectinate............... 23 + + +— Antennae weakly serrate or filiform..... 24 + + + + + +23. Antennomeres 3–10 very long and narrow, almost cylindrical; antennal branches not much longer than their stem antennomeres............... + +Eugeusis +Westwood + +* (OR) + + + + +— Antennomeres 3–10 short and broad, flat; antennal branches about 3–4 times length of their stem antennomeres............................. + +Hyperstoma +Wittmer + + +1 + +(OR) + + + + + + +24. Compound eye less than one-quarter of head width in dorsal aspect; genae behind compound eyes (temple) exposed; antennae widely separated from each other....................... + +Lamellipalpus +Maulik + +** +(OR) + + + + +— Compound eye about of one-quarter head width; temple covered by pronotum; antennae more or less approximate..................... + +Lampellipalpodes +Maulik + +* (OR) + + + + + +25. True abdominal sternite 2 long, weakly sclerotized in anterior part but uniformly sclerotized on central disc, largely exposed in ventral aspect as first ventrite, with its posterior margin reaching base of metatrochanters; abdominal spiracles at edge of pleural membrane and dorsally folded portion of sternites, scarcely visible directly in dorsal aspect when elytra and hind wings removed....................... 26 + + +— True abdominal sternite 2 short, weakly sclerotized centrally, largely concealed by metatrochanters and barely visible in ventral aspect, with its posterior margin usually not reaching base of metatrochanters; abdominal spiracles entirely enclosed by dorsally folded portion of sternites, always visible in dorsal aspect when elytra and hind wings removed........................ 29 + + + + + +26. Antennae serrate; tibial spurs present.......... + +Falsophaeopterus +Pic + +** (OR) + + + +— Antennae unipectinate or filiform; tibial spur absent......................... 27 + + + + + +27. Antennae filiform; compound eyes with posterior margin significantly emarginate........... + +Oculogryphus + +, +n. gen. +* (OR) + + + +— Antennae unipectinate; compound eyes not emarginate on posterior margin...... 28 + + + + + +28. Pronotum with posterior margin round, surpassing posterolateral angles.......................... + +Harmatelia +Gorham + +* (OR) + + + + +— Pronotum with posterior margin straight, not surpassing posterolateral angles................ + +Stenocladius +Fairmaire + +** (PA, OR) + + + + + +29. Posterior margin of pronotum round, surpassing posterolateral angles............ 30 + + +— Posterior margin of pronotum nearly straight, not surpassing posterolateral angles.... 31 + + + + + +30. Antennae weakly serrate or somewhat filiform, with flagellar articles symmetric on lateral sides; first tarsomere of hind leg slightly longer than following article.......................... + +Ceylanidrilus +Pic + +** (OR) + + + + +— Antennae strongly serrate, with flagellar articles asymmetric on lateral sides; first tarsomere of hind legs 1.5 times longer than following article.............................. + +Gorhamia +Pic + +* (OR), + +Pachytarsus +Motschulsky + +# +(OR) + + + + + + +31. Antennae pectinate... + +Flabellotreta +Pic + +** (OR) + + + +— Antennae not pectinate.............. 32 + + + + + +32. Antennae about as long as body, strongly serrate, with flagellar articles elongate triangular, clearly asymmetric on lateral sides....... + +Mimophaeopterus +Pic + +** (OR) + + + +— Antennae not as long as body, more or less filiform, with flagellar articles weakly serrate, symmetric, or slightly asymmetric on lateral sides.......................... 33 + + + + + +33. Pedicel of antenna about twice as long as wide; antennal sockets weakly convex above.......... + +Drilaster +Kiesenwetter + +** (OR, PA) + + + + +— Pedicel of antenna abbreviated, about as long as broad; antennal sockets convex above............... + +Picodrilus +Wittmer + +* (OR) + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/CA/87/03CA8784FFBDFFEC54FDA98CFBBBA188.xml b/data/03/CA/87/03CA8784FFBDFFEC54FDA98CFBBBA188.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..881886dac80 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/CA/87/03CA8784FFBDFFEC54FDA98CFBBBA188.xml @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ + + + +Oculogryphus, A Remarkable New Genus of Fireflies from Asia (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) + + + +Author + +JENG, M. - L. + + + +Author + +ENGEL, MICHAEL S. + + + +Author + +YANG, P. - S. + +text + + +American Museum Novitates + + +2007 + +2007-12-12 + + +3600 + + +1 +20 + + + + +http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1206/0003-0082%282007%293600%5B1%3AOARNGO%5D2.0.CO%3B2 + +journal article +10.1206/0003-0082(2007)3600[1:OARNGO]2.0.CO;2 +0003-0082 +5389057 + + + + + +Oculogryphus fulvus +Jeng + +, +new species + + + + + +Figures 1–13 + + + + + +TYPE +LOCALITY: +Tam Dao +, +Province Vinh Phu +, +Vietnam +. + + + +DIAGNOSIS: As for the genus (see above). + + + +DESCRIPTION: +Male. +BL 6.0 mm, BW 2.5 mm; body form elongate oval and somewhat depressed; overall coloration brown except vertex black; antennal scape and pedicel brown, flagellar articles dark brown; elytra brown, looking darker from basal fifth to apices due to shadows of hind wings; venter brown throughout. Head with vertex and beyond exposed from above, not hidden by pronotum; vertex flat between eyes, surface glabrous, densely punctate and pubescent. Distance between compound eyes about twofifths of greatest width of head in dorsal aspect, one-fifth in frontal aspect (fig. 7), and one-sixth in ventral aspect. Antennae (fig. 6) with scape elongate quadrate in dorsal aspect, about as long as first flagellar article (FA1); FA1–3 each subequal in length, 4–8 each subequal in length and shorter than 1–3; FA 9 (terminal antennomere) spindle-like. + +Pronotum subparallel-sided; posterior angles sharply cornered; punctures on disc separated by about their own diameter (fig. 2). Scutellum large and triangular in shape. Elytra with well-defined lateral margins; surface more or less shagreened, densely setose, costae insignificant except sutural costae. Elytral epipleuron (fig. 5) deeply folded, lying in ventral side of elytra and nearly invisible from lateral aspect, about onesixth of elytral length. Mesoventrite (fig. 4) broadly V-shaped. Central longitudinal sulcus of metaventrite obsolete. Abdominal T8 (fig. 10) broadly rounded apically and slightly emarginate medioapically, S8 (fig. 11) subtrapezoidal. PW/PL 5 1.4; EL/EW 5 3.3; EL/PL 5 3.4; BW/PW 5 1.5. +Aedeagal sheath (fig. 12) about 0.7 mm long, 0.4 mm broad; syntergite slightly surpassing apex of S9; T9 about as long as T10; T10 triangular; S9 setose in apical one-third, rounded at apex, tapering toward base. Genitalia (fig. 13) about 0.5 mm long, 0.3 mm broad; median lobe parallel sided in basal half and gradually tapering apically in dorsal aspect; paramere weakly sclerotized apically but strongly so in posterior margin; dorsum forming a widely V-shaped band connecting with median lobe; basal piece about as long as median lobe, bilaterally symmetric, roughly a V-shaped band, slightly pointed apically. + + +Figs. 6–9. + +Oculogryphus fulvus + +, +new genus and species +, male. +6. +Antenna. +7. +Head, frontal aspect; antennae and most of the mouthparts except mandibles and labrum were not shown. +8. +Hind wing. +9. +Hind leg, trochanter to tarsus. + + + +Female. +Unknown. + + + + +TYPE MATERIAL: + +Holotype +, +male +; ‘‘N. +Vietnam +1985, pr. Vinh phu, Tam dao 3.6.- 11.6. +V. Švihis +lgt.’’. The holotype will be preserved in the National Museum of Natural Science, Taichung City, Taiwan ( +NMNS +) + +. + + + +ETYMOLOGY: The specific epithet refers to the light brown coloration of the species. + + + \ No newline at end of file