diff --git a/data/03/B4/DA/03B4DA36EA09B45BFD44FE84E029FA7F.xml b/data/03/B4/DA/03B4DA36EA09B45BFD44FE84E029FA7F.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f5fe4f6110a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/B4/DA/03B4DA36EA09B45BFD44FE84E029FA7F.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,749 @@
+
+
+
+A subspecies of marbled newt (Triturus marmoratus) in the Iberian Peninsula newly resolved from congruent nuclear and mitochondrial DNA data
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Arntzen, Jan W.
+0000-0003-3229-5993
+Institute of Biology, Leiden University, 2333 BE Leiden, The Netherlands Naturalis Biodiversity Center, 2333 CR Leiden, The Netherlands
+pim.arntzen@gmail.com
+
+text
+
+
+Contributions to Zoology
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-04-01
+
+
+93
+
+
+252
+267
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18759866-bja10060
+
+journal article
+310323
+10.1163/18759866-BJA10060
+814a05d4-fc17-4270-a6e5-e613b534360b
+1875-9866
+13153846
+
+
+
+
+Description of
+
+Triturus marmoratus harmannis
+
+
+ssp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+Descriptions were made from preserved material, except for the
+Nlinks
+character state that was determined in the field. Dorsal colouration invariably dark, yet with the green colouration pattern discernible. Morphological data retrieved for a series of live animals are in
+Table A1
+.
+
+
+Description of type specimen – preserved on ethanol in excellent storage condition at the ‘Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales’,
+Madrid
+,
+Spain
+under catalogue number MNCN 51792. Adult male in breeding condition with a well-developed crest and a large back cloaca. Thirteen crème-white bands over the head and body part of the crest. SVl1
+64.5 mm
+, SVl2
+73.5 mm
+, ILd
+32.5 mm
+, FLl
+28.3 mm
+, TFl
+8.5 mm
+, HLl
+28.1 mm
+, FTl
+11.6 mm
+, Hw
+14.1 mm
+and Hl
+19.7 mm
+.Total length
+136.5 mm
+.Relative finger lengths 1<4<2<3. Relative toe lengths 1<5<2<4<3.
+Nlinks
+left 0, right 0, total 0. Solid dark grey ventral colouration with many more or less evenly distributed white spots, denser in the middle part than towards the gular and cloacal regions. Throat region light grey with many small white dots. Underside of the legs and cloacal region with light and dark regions. The
+holotype
+is shown in fig. A1. A three-dimensional model of the entire skeleton of the type specimen obtained with CT-scanning is available for inspection at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25358890, courtesy of Dr. Tijana Vučić’.
+
+
+Description of
+paratypes
+– Preserved on ethanol in excellent storage condition at the ‘Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales’,
+Madrid
+,
+Spain
+.
+
+
+
+TABLE A1 Morphometric data for live adult
+
+Triturus marmoratus harmannis
+
+
+ssp. nov.
+
+from the type locality. Characters measured are described in the text.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Males
+
+
+
+
+Number
+
+
+SVl1
+
+
+SVl2
+
+
+ILd
+
+
+FLl
+
+
+TFl
+
+
+HLl
+
+
+FTl
+
+
+Hw
+
+
+Hl
+
+
+Total length
+
+
+Nlinks
+
+
+
+
1
+
73
+
83
+
38
+
30.3
+
8.9
+
32.6
+
9.3
+
15.1
+
20.1
+
151
+
1
+
+
+
2
+
58
+
67
+
31
+
25.3
+
7.8
+
25.1
+
7.3
+
12.5
+
17.9
+
123
+
0
+
+
+
3
+
65
+
75
+
32
+
28.8
+
7.4
+
27.0
+
8.3
+
13.3
+
19.0
+
137
+
0
+
+
+
4
+
70
+
79
+
39
+
27.4
+
7.8
+
28.7
+
7.9
+
14.3
+
20.8
+
145
+
0
+
+
+
5
+
70
+
80
+
38
+
29.4
+
8.4
+
28.7
+
8.8
+
14.6
+
18.0
+
147
+
0
+
+
+
6
+
66
+
75
+
37
+
27.9
+
7.6
+
30.0
+
8.5
+
13.8
+
18.8
+
139
+
1
+
+
+
7
+
59
+
63
+
30
+
25.8
+
6.7
+
25.3
+
7.2
+
13.2
+
17.5
+
126
+
0
+
+
+
8
+
65
+
75
+
37
+
27.3
+
7.2
+
27.9
+
7.8
+
13.8
+
18.0
+
136
+
0
+
+
+
9
+
74
+
83
+
42
+
31.7
+
9.2
+
33.0
+
9.6
+
15.5
+
21.1
+
139 #
+
0
+
+
+
10
+
67
+
75
+
33
+
30.5
+
8.6
+
30.2
+
9.1
+
14.2
+
16.8
+
140
+
0
+
+
+
11
+
66
+
75
+
34
+
30.0
+
8.8
+
28.5
+
8.3
+
14.5
+
18.5
+
137
+
0
+
+
+
12
+
62
+
70
+
36
+
28.3
+
8.8
+
28.8
+
9.3
+
13.6
+
16.1
+
132
+
0
+
+
+
Females
+
+
+
13
+
73
+
81
+
39
+
27.2
+
7.8
+
27.5
+
6.3
+
15.6
+
19.4
+
151
+
0
+
+
+
14
+
73
+
81
+
40
+
27.7
+
6.7
+
28.2
+
7.1
+
14.2
+
20.5
+
152
+
0
+
+
+
15
+
75
+
82
+
41
+
19.3
+
8.0
+
28.9
+
7.7
+
14.7
+
19.6
+
156
+
0
+
+
+
16
+
76
+
84
+
43
+
28.4
+
7.4
+
28.0
+
7.1
+
15.6
+
21.3
+
155
+
0
+
+
+
17
+
76
+
83
+
42
+
28.9
+
8.4
+
28.5
+
7.8
+
15.1
+
18.9
+
155
+
0
+
+
+
18
+
71
+
78
+
40
+
26.5
+
7.4
+
26.7
+
6.6
+
15.5
+
20.6
+
148
+
3
+
+
+
19
+
75
+
84
+
40
+
28.1
+
6.4
+
26.5
+
6.2
+
15.4
+
21.5
+
155
+
0
+
+
+
20
+
75
+
83
+
44
+
28.5
+
6.7
+
27.4
+
6.6
+
15.6
+
19.3
+
155
+
4
+
+
+
21
+
72
+
80
+
40
+
29.0
+
7.5
+
28.8
+
6.6
+
15.5
+
19.5
+
150
+
0
+
+
+
22
+
76
+
83
+
40
+
28.6
+
6.5
+
28.8
+
7.7
+
14.4
+
22.2
+
155
+
3
+
+
+
23
+
74
+
80
+
42
+
28.2
+
6.8
+
26.3
+
6.3
+
14.6
+
19.1
+
152
+
3
+
+
+
24
+
71
+
78
+
38
+
25.3
+
7.1
+
25.5
+
6.4
+
14.3
+
19.5
+
147
+
0
+
+
+
# Tail damaged
+
+
+
+
+First
+paratype
+MNCN 51793. Adult male in breeding condition with a well-developed crest and a large back cloaca. Seventeen crème-white bands over the head and body part of the crest. SVl1 65.0 mm, SVl2
+73.5 mm
+, ILd 34.0 mm, FLl
+26.2 mm
+, TFl
+9.3 mm
+, HLl 27.0 mm, FTl
+11.5 mm
+, Hw
+13.6 mm
+and Hl
+19.9 mm
+. Total length
+135 mm
+. Relative finger lengths 1=4<2<3. Relative toe lengths 1<5<2<4<3.
+Nlinks
+left 0, right 1, total 1. Grey ventral colouration with many dark dots.
+
+Many white spots mostly positioned on the undotted sections. Colour of the throat continuous with that of the belly. Underside of the legs and cloacal region with light and dark regions.
+
+Second
+paratype
+MNCN 51794. Adult male in breeding condition with a low crest and a large back cloaca. Eleven crème-white bands over the head and body part of the low crest. SVl1
+56.5 mm
+, SVl2 64.0 mm, ILd
+28.5 mm
+, FLl
+23.4 mm
+, TFl
+7.7 mm
+, HLl
+23.6 mm
+, FTl
+9.6 mm
+, Hw
+12.6 mm
+and Hl
+17.7 mm
+. Total length
+118 mm
+. Tail tip regenerating. Relative finger lengths 1<4<2<3. Relative toe lengths 1<5<2<4<3.
+Nlinks
+left 1, right 2, total 3. Solid black ventral colouration with many, evenly distributed small white spots. Throat colouration continuous with belly with equally dense but larger white spots. Underside of the legs and cloacal region light with few dark regions.
+
+
+Downloaded from Brill.com 07/10/2024 02:02:47PM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
+
+
+
+FIGURE A1 Holotype of
+
+Triturus marmoratus harmannis
+
+
+ssp. nov.
+
+at right and ventral view. Size bar is 1 cm. Stored at the Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain under catalogue number 51792.
+
+
+
+Third
+paratype
+MNCN 51795. Adult female in breeding condition with ovaries shining through. SVl1 64.0 mm, SVl2 70.0 mm, ILd 33.0 mm, FLl
+25.1 mm
+, TFl
+8.3 mm
+, HLl
+23.7 mm
+, FTl
+7.6 mm
+, Hw
+14.5 mm
+and Hl
+19.6 mm
+. Total length
+140.5 mm
+. Relative finger lengths 1<4<2<3. Relative toe lengths 1=5<2<4<3.
+Nlinks
+left 2, right 2, total 4. Solid, medium-grey ventral colouration with few, evenly distributed small white spots. Throat coloration continuous with that of the belly. Underside of the legs and cloacal region solid light grey.
+
+
+Fourth
+paratype
+MNCN 51796. Adult female in breeding condition with ovaries shining through. SVl1 73.0 mm, SVl2
+79.5 mm
+, ILd
+39.5 mm
+, FLl
+28.1 mm
+, TFl
+9.3 mm
+, HLl
+26.4 mm
+, FTl
+8.8 mm
+, Hw
+16.5 mm
+and Hl
+21.7 mm
+. Total length
+149 mm
+. Relative finger lengths 1<4<2<3. Relative toe lengths 1<5<2<4<3.
+Nlinks
+left 0, right 0, total 0. Dark grey ventral colouration with few small dark dots and few white spots. Colouration of throat continuous with belly. Underside of the legs and cloacal region light with few dark regions.
+
+
+Fifth
+paratype
+MNCN 51797. Adult female in breeding condition with ovaries shining through. SVl1 71.0 mm, SVl2
+77.5 mm
+, ILd
+37.5 mm
+, FLl
+27.4 mm
+, TFl
+9.1 mm
+, HLl 26.0 mm, FTl
+7.2 mm
+, Hw
+15.4 mm
+and Hl
+22.2 mm
+. Total length
+150.5 mm
+. Relative finger lengths 1=4<2<3. Relative toe lengths 1=5<2<4<3.
+Nlinks
+left 1, right 2, total 3. Light grey ventral colouration with large dark dots and few white spots towards the flanks. Colouration of throat continuous with belly. Underside of the legs and cloacal region light with few dark regions.
+
+
+Sixth
+paratype
+MNCN 51798. Adult female in breeding condition with ovaries shining through. SVl1 72.0 mm, SVl2
+78.5 mm
+, ILd
+38.5 mm
+, FLl 28.0 mm, TFl 9.0 mm, HLl
+27.2 mm
+, FTl
+8.7 mm
+, Hw
+16.1 mm
+and Hl
+21.1 mm
+. Total length
+146 mm
+. Relative finger lengths 1=4<2<3. Relative toe lengths 1<5<2<3=4.
+Nlinks
+left 2, right 2, total 4. Light grey ventral colouration with medium number of large dark dots and few white spots. Colouration of throat continuous with belly. Underside of the legs and cloacal region light with few dark regions.
+
+
+
+
+
+Locality and date of collecting –
+Arrochela
+, near
+Madeirã
+,
+Portugal
+at 39.9386northern latitude and 8.1025 western longitude. Elevation
+
+396 m
+a.s.l.
+
+Date of collecting
+
+20 March 2013
+
+, leg.
+J. W. Arntzen.
+Date of deposition at
+MNCN
+16 August 2023
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnostic features – the newly recognized subspecies is closely related to and morphometrically similar to
+
+T. m.
+marmoratus
+
+, yet at the population level characterized by a lower number of green coloured dorso-lateral transversal bands (‘links’). In comparison with
+
+T. m.
+marmoratus
+
+, it has a small body size, significantly shorter extremities in females and a relatively big head in both sexes. The distinctiveness of the subspecies is supported by nuclear and mitochondrial DNA data.
+
+
+
+
+Derivatio nominis
+– the subspecies name is chosen to commemorate the Dutch couple Harm and Annie (or Ann) Walen, who lived from 1926‒2005 (Mr. H. C. Walen) and 1928‒ 2018 (Mrs. A. A. van Silfhout). After Harm’s retirement from his taxidermist job at the Zoological Museum in Amsterdam, the twosome eventually landed in Nisa,
+Portugal
+where they constructed their own ‘quinta’ and felt enormously at place. Without ‘harmann’s’ hospitality and moral support, my extensive fieldwork in
+Portugal
+and adjacent
+Spain
+late last century would hardly have been sustainable. The new subspecies’ name refers to a lifelong couple and only indirectly to individual people so that, matrimony being gender neutral, the third declension is used.
+
+
+
+
+Suggested
+vernacular name –
+Harmann’s
+marbled newt, or
+central Iberian
+marbled newt
+Distribution
+– central-western
+Iberia
+.
+The
+southern range border is determined by a sharp, parapatric, yet mosaic range border with two pygmy newt species, namely
+
+T. rudolfi
+
+in the west and
+
+T. pygmaeus
+
+in the centre of the Iberian Peninsula. The northern edge of the range is positioned at ca.
+41.5 N
+. The transition area with the nominotypical subspecies may be wide.
+
+
+
+
+Nomenclatorial act – the electronic ‘on-line early’ version of this article is considered a published work according to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The new name has also been registered in ZooBank (http://zoobank.org/) where it can be accessed under http://zoobank.org/
+
+urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:
+6DE32B0B-FB92-4F45-80BB-15 EBC49DD23E
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/B5/9F/03B59F7DFF9C7138F8F06CECFAB7FA52.xml b/data/03/B5/9F/03B59F7DFF9C7138F8F06CECFAB7FA52.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f9c5d94f0be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/B5/9F/03B59F7DFF9C7138F8F06CECFAB7FA52.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
+
+
+
+New synonyms in Celastraceae toward an update of the flora of Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Biral, Leonardo
+
+text
+
+
+Phytotaxa
+
+
+2020
+
+2020-06-02
+
+
+446
+
+
+4
+
+
+237
+244
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.446.4.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/phytotaxa.446.4.4
+1179-3163
+13878069
+
+
+
+
+
+Monteverdia communis
+(Reissek)
+Biral (2017: 688)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+≡
+
+Maytenus communis
+Reissek (1861: 22-23
+
+, t. IV, f. 2, t. VIII).
+
+
+
+
+Type
+:—
+
+BRAZIL
+.
+Rio de Janeiro
+:
+in dumetosis et silvaticis prope urbem principalem
+, 1832,
+
+Riedel
+s.n.
+
+(
+lectotype
+,
+US
+, first-step lectotype designated by
+Carvalho-Okano 1998: 74
+, second-step lectotype, US [16368, barcode
+US01866918
+]! image, designated here
+
+;
+
+isolectotypes
+,
+BR
+[
+BR0000005737000
+]!
+
+,
+
+F
+[871160, barcode
+V0053734F
+& 940151, barcode
+V0053751F
+]! images
+
+,
+
+GH
+[
+GH00049846
+]! image
+
+,
+
+K
+[
+K000494549
+&
+K000494550
+]
+
+!
+
+images,
+LECB
+[
+LECB0002322
+,
+LECB0002323
+&
+LECB0002324
+]!images
+
+,
+
+MO
+[3575647,barcode
+MO-260564
+]
+
+!,
+
+NY
+[
+
+NY
+01031025
+
+&
+
+NY
+01031026
+
+]!
+
+,
+
+P
+[P [
+P05585697
+,
+P05585698
+,
+P05585699
+&
+P05585700
+]! images
+
+,
+
+RB
+[37821, barcode
+RB00068210
+]!
+
+,
+
+S
+[
+S-R-11- 18752
+]!
+
+,
+
+US
+[16732, barcode
+US01866917
+]! image
+
+,
+
+W
+[
+1880-1190
+&
+1889-62371
+]! images
+
+,
+
+B
+† [F neg 13277]
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+=
+
+Maytenus grandiflora
+Reissek (1861: 23
+
+, t. III, f. 3).
+Type
+:—
+BRAZIL
+.
+Rio de Janeiro
+: in prope urbem principale, s.d. [1817-1821],
+
+Schott
+s.n.
+
+(
+lectotype
+W [0059534]! image, designated here;
+isolectotypes
+F [870327, barcode V0361497F]!, W [0059532 & 0059533]! images).
+syn. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+Maytenus grandiflora
+
+was described by
+Reissek (1861)
+based on three different collections gathered from the city of
+Rio de Janeiro
+by Johann Christian Mikan, Heinrich Wilhelm Schott and Guilherme Schüch de Capanema. After analysis of protologue and examination of specimens mentioned, no relevant difference between the circumscription of
+
+M. grandiflora
+
+and
+
+Monteverdia communis
+
+could be observed. It is a typical species from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, characterized by lanceolate to elliptic leaves, drying brown on the abaxial side, and multiflowered cymes with a conspicuous peduncle, always longer than pedicels, and flowers distributed along the axis. These two species were published in the same volume of
+
+Flora Brasiliensis
+(
+Reissek 1861
+)
+
+; in this case the name
+
+M. communis
+
+is the preferable to be used as its basionym is most commonly found in literature and herbarium identifications (see article 11.5. of the Shenzen Code,
+
+Turland
+et al.
+2018
+
+).
+
+
+The specimen W0059534 is selected as
+lectotype
+for
+
+Maytenus grandifolia
+.
+
+This specimen is the unique that bears a label that includes a handwritten description by Reissek, very similar to the one he provided in the protologue, which constitutes clear evidence by the author in applying this name (Recommendation 9a.3 from the Shenzen Code,
+
+Turland
+et al.
+2018
+
+). No date is provided on the label; however, according to
+Urban (1906)
+, Schott collected in and near the city of
+Rio de Janeiro
+between 1817 and 1820. The specimen represented by negative number 19567 from the Field Museum’s Type Photograph Collection (previously deposited in B, and presumably destroyed) is not type of
+
+M. grandifolia
+
+because it is of a specimen gathered by Riedel and, thus, is not part of the original material.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/B5/9F/03B59F7DFF9C713BF8F06B34FEB6FEE0.xml b/data/03/B5/9F/03B59F7DFF9C713BF8F06B34FEB6FEE0.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d07fd3dfe2b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/B5/9F/03B59F7DFF9C713BF8F06B34FEB6FEE0.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+
+
+
+New synonyms in Celastraceae toward an update of the flora of Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Biral, Leonardo
+
+text
+
+
+Phytotaxa
+
+
+2020
+
+2020-06-02
+
+
+446
+
+
+4
+
+
+237
+244
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.446.4.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/phytotaxa.446.4.4
+1179-3163
+13878069
+
+
+
+
+
+Monteverdia floribunda
+(Reissek)
+Biral (2017: 688)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+≡
+
+Maytenus floribunda
+Reissek (1861: 16
+
+, t. IV, f. 3, t. VII).
+
+
+
+
+Type
+:—
+
+BRAZIL
+.
+Goiás
+:
+ad Crixas
+,
+
+May 1819
+
+,
+
+Pohl
+s.n.
+
+(
+lectotype
+,
+W
+[
+0047062
+] [U neg 1177]! image, designated here
+
+;
+
+isolectotypes
+,
+BR
+[
+0000005737673
+]!
+
+,
+
+LE
+[n.v., indicated by
+Carvalho-Okano 1992: 62
+and
+Carvalho-Okano & Leitão-Filho 2004: 29
+],
+
+
+W
+[
+0047063
+]! image
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+=
+
+Maytenus floribunda
+
+(
+Reissek 1861: 16
+, t. IV, f. 3, t. VII)
+
+var.
+parvifolia
+Warming (1880: 366)
+
+. Type:—
+BRAZIL
+.
+Minas Gerais
+: Lagoa Santa [Lapa Vermelha], in silvis, s.d. [
+11 November 1864
+],
+Warming s.n.
+(
+holotype
+, C [C10023017]! image).
+syn. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+Maytenus floribunda
+var.
+parvifolia
+
+was described by Eugenius Warming based on one of his collections from the Minas Gerais state in Brazil’s Southeastern region, where he lived from 1863 to 1866 (
+Klein 2002
+).
+
+Monteverdia floribunda
+
+is a widely distributed species in South America. It is most prevalent in the Brazilian areas containing Cerrado vegetation but has also been collected in
+Bolivia
+,
+Colombia
+and Guyanas (
+
+Biral
+et al.
+2015
+
+).
+
+Maytenus floribunda
+var.
+parvifolia
+
+was ignored in
+Carvalho-Okano’s (1992)
+
+Maytenus
+
+revision and it did not appear in other references I traced. After contacting the herbarium C, I was able to inspect a high-resolution image of the
+holotype
+and to determine that its continued designation as a variety of
+
+Monteverdia floribunda
+
+, based solely on leaf characters, is not supported. The leaves of
+
+M. floribunda
+
+are quite variable in size but relatively constant in other features, such as having an elliptic to obovate shape, a margin that is crenate only close to the apex, 11-14 pairs of ascending secondary veins, and multi-flowered fasciculate inflorescences.
+
+
+The specimen W0047062 is elected as
+lectotype
+for
+
+Monteverdia floribunda
+
+because it is constituted by a complete branch with flowers and contains two labels, one with the name author’s identification and other bearing a handwritten description.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/B5/9F/03B59F7DFF9E713AF8F06C16FD3EFB24.xml b/data/03/B5/9F/03B59F7DFF9E713AF8F06C16FD3EFB24.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b5b50575813
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/B5/9F/03B59F7DFF9E713AF8F06C16FD3EFB24.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+
+
+
+New synonyms in Celastraceae toward an update of the flora of Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Biral, Leonardo
+
+text
+
+
+Phytotaxa
+
+
+2020
+
+2020-06-02
+
+
+446
+
+
+4
+
+
+237
+244
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.446.4.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/phytotaxa.446.4.4
+1179-3163
+13878069
+
+
+
+
+Monteverdia laevis
+(Reissek)
+Biral (2017:689)
+
+.
+
+
+≡
+
+Maytenus laevis
+Reissek (1861: 27
+
+, t. IV, f. 6).
+
+
+Type
+:—
+
+VENEZUELA
+.
+Amazonas
+: habitat ad flum. [‘Guainia v.’]
+Rio Negro
+, supra ostium flum.
+Cassiquiare
+,
+
+June 1854
+
+,
+Spruce 2284
+(
+lectotype
+, BR [BR0000005737055]!, designated here;
+isolectotypes
+
+,
+BM [BM000778831]! image
+,
+E [E000775445]! image
+,
+F [871648, barcode VF0053757F]! image
+,
+G!
+,
+GH [GH00049865]! image
+,
+K [K000494623 & K000494624]! images
+,
+MO [1624264, barcode MO-2196878]
+!,
+NY [NY00380604
+,
+MO neg 5035]!
+,
+P [P02274006 & P05585758]! images
+).
+
+
+=
+
+Monteverdia sapotiformis
+(
+Reissek)
+Biral (2017: 690)
+
+. ≡
+
+Maytenus sapotiformis
+Reissek (1861: 27
+
+, t. IV, f. 5). Type:—
+GUYANA
+. S.d.,
+Lindley
+[
+Martin
+]
+s.n.
+(
+holotype
+BR [BR0000005798797]!).
+syn. nov.
+
+
+Revisiting the
+Celastraceae
+names published by
+Reissek (1861)
+in Martius’
+
+Flora Brasiliensis
+
+, no substantial differences could be found between
+types
+and protologues of
+
+Maytenus laevis
+
+and
+
+M. sapotiformis
+
+. They are indistinguishable morphologically, being characterized by carenated young twigs, coriaceous leaves with obscure venation on both sides, pruinose, usually blackening as they dry, and fasciculate inflorescences. Both names were described on the same page of the
+Celastraceae
+treatment in
+
+Flora Brasiliensis
+(
+Reissek 1861
+, p. 27)
+
+, so there is not an older name that must have priority. However, the combination based on
+
+Maytenus laevis
+
+is preferable to be used as it is more common in literature and herbarium determinations (see article 11.5. of the Shenzen Code,
+
+Turland
+et al.
+2018
+
+). I have seen herbarium specimens of
+
+Monteverdia laevis
+
+from
+Colombia
+(
+Vaupés
+, but also cited for
+Guainía
+by
+Kearns 1998
+),
+Venezuela
+(
+Amazonas
+and
+Bolívar
+) and
+Brazil
+(Amazonas).
+
+
+In the protologue,
+Reissek (1861)
+cited the type of
+
+M. sapotiformis
+
+as deposited in the
+Herbarium Martii
+(“hb. Mart.”), currently housed at BR (
+Förther 1994
+). During a visit to BR, I located a unique specimen of
+
+M. sapotiformis
+
+in its
+Celastraceae
+collection; the specimen is annotated with Reissek’s determination and his signature indicating that it is clearly the
+holotype
+(following
+McNeill 2014
+). The specimen BR0000005737055 is selected here as
+lectotype
+for
+
+M. laevis
+
+because it is the unique mentioned specimen that brings a label signed by Reissek (Recommendation 9a.3 from the Shenzen Code,
+
+Turland
+et al.
+2018
+
+).
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/B5/9F/03B59F7DFF9F713AF8F06CA2FF72FE8C.xml b/data/03/B5/9F/03B59F7DFF9F713AF8F06CA2FF72FE8C.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..52cb42f263b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/B5/9F/03B59F7DFF9F713AF8F06CA2FF72FE8C.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
+
+
+
+New synonyms in Celastraceae toward an update of the flora of Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Biral, Leonardo
+
+text
+
+
+Phytotaxa
+
+
+2020
+
+2020-06-02
+
+
+446
+
+
+4
+
+
+237
+244
+
+
+
+
+http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.446.4.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/phytotaxa.446.4.4
+1179-3163
+13878069
+
+
+
+
+
+Monteverdia ilicifolia
+(Mart. ex Reissek)
+Biral (2017: 689)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+≡
+
+Maytenus ilicifolia
+Martius ex
+Reissek (1861: 8
+
+, t. I, f. 11 a, b, t. VI).
+
+
+
+
+Type:—
+
+BRAZIL,
+URUGUAY
+.
+In Brasilia meridionali extratropica et ad Montevideo
+, 1821-1823,
+
+Sellow
+d768
+
+(
+lectotype
+,
+M
+, designated by
+Biral & Lombardi 2012: 468
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+=
+
+Maytenus acanthophylla
+Reissek (1861: 6
+
+, t. I, f. 5)
+
+var.
+eurostos
+Loesener
+
+in
+Kuntze (1898: 37)
+. Type:—
+BRAZIL
+.
+Mato Grosso do Sul
+: Corumbá, [late]
+August 1892
+,
+Kuntze s.n.
+(
+holotype
+, NY [NY01031056]!).
+syn. nov.
+
+
+=
+
+Maytenus castaneiformis
+Reissek (1861: 7
+
+, t. I, f. 7, as “
+castaneaeformis
+”, see the article 60.10 of the Shenzen Code,
+
+Turland
+et al.
+2018
+
+).
+Type
+:—
+BRAZIL
+.
+Goiás
+: [Buenolândia] ad
+Rio Bugres
+[prope Barra], s.d. [
+
+April 1819
+
+],
+Pohl s.n.
+[
+1710
+] (
+lectotype
+, W [0059514]! image, designated here;
+isolectotypes
+, BR [BR0000005739677]!, W [0059515]! image, B† [F neg 13276]).
+syn. nov.
+
+
+=
+
+Maytenus macrodonta
+Reissek (1861: 6-7
+
+, t. I, f. 6).
+Type
+:—
+BRAZIL
+. [
+Goiás
+]
+Habitat in Brasiliae
+meridionalis interioribus [Rio Pillano], s.d. [late
+
+March 1919
+
+-
+
+February 1820
+
+],
+Pohl s.n.
+[
+2444
+] (
+lectotype
+, W [0059540]! image, designated here;
+isolectotypes
+, F [frag., 870042, barcode V0044275F]! image).
+Syn. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+Maytenus acanthophylla
+var.
+eurostos
+
+is a forgotten name, absent in all
+Celastraceae
+literature I accessed after its publication. I came cross the
+holotype
+(not annotated as such) when examined New World
+
+Maytenus
+
+specimens provided on loan from the NY herbarium. The specimen is derived from the Herbarium of Otto Kuntze (purchased by Andrew Carnegie for the New York Botanical Garden, see
+Zanoni 1980
+), signed by Ludwig Eduard Theodor Loesener (the species’ author) and its label includes the following diagnosis: “
+
+Maytenus acanthophylla Reiss. forma eurostos Loes.
+forma nova
+foliis paullo latioribus, basi magis truncatis spinis robustioribus diversa
+
+”. Later, when the name was validly published, Loesener (in
+Kuntze 1898
+) did so as a variety of
+
+Maytenus acanthophylla
+
+and not as a forma. Some specimens of
+
+Monteverdia ilicifolia
+
+, especially those from
+Bolivia
+and Brazilian states of Mato Grosso and Mato Grosso do Sul, are confused with
+
+Monteverdia acanthophylla
+
+(
+Reissek 1861: 6
+, t. I, f. 5)
+Biral (2017: 688)
+because they have broad leaves with long spines on the margin but can be differentiated by their spherical fruits, as opposed to the tetragonal fruits of
+
+Monteverdia acanthophylla
+
+.
+
+Monteverdia ilicifolia
+
+is widely distributed in the forests of
+Argentina
+,
+Bolivia
+,
+Brazil
+(chiefly, in south region),
+Paraguay
+and
+Uruguay
+, whereas
+
+Monteverdia acanthophylla
+
+is endemic to
+Brazil
+, especially in areas with caatinga vegetation (
+BFG 2015
+).
+
+
+Carvalho-Okano (1992: 228)
+considered
+
+Maytenus castaneiformis
+
+in the “Untreated species” section of her thesis because she did not have access to any original material from this species. In addition to this mention, I found no citation of this name in literature. The morphological characters available from the type specimens and mentioned in the protologue overlap those found for
+
+Monteverdia ilicifolia
+
+. The leaves with two or three pairs of spines concentrated only on the apex presented in the type specimens are quite characteristics of
+
+M
+.
+ilicifolia
+
+; thus,
+
+Maytenus castaneiformis
+
+is considered here as its synonym. The specimen
+
+Pohl
+1710
+
+in W [0059514] is designated here as
+lectotype
+for
+
+M
+.
+castaneiformis
+
+because it is constituted by a complete branch with an attached label bearing a handwritten morphological description by
+Reissek
+that is identical to that provided by him in the protologue (see Recommendation 9a.3. from the Shenzen Code,
+
+Turland
+et al.
+2018
+
+).
+The
+collection date is not provided on the label but was taken from the
+Pohl’s
+itinerary in
+Brazil
+according to
+Urban (1906)
+.
+
+
+
+Maytenus macrodonta
+
+was described by
+Reissek (1861)
+in Martius’
+
+Flora Brasiliensis
+
+. The description presented in the protologue is short and essentially based on vegetative characters, such as branches and leaves (shape, measures, number of spines and secondary veins). No flower or fruit features are mentioned and the unique information cited about the inflorescence [“
+
+Flores
+axillares, aggregati
+
+”,
+Reissek (1861: 7)
+] is not informative since all
+
+Maytenus
+
+/
+
+Monteverdia
+species
+
+with spinose leaves share this type of inflorescence. Because the description lacks details and no original material was accessible,
+Carvalho-Okano (1992)
+excluded the name from her thesis. Now, considering the protologue, the type collections and the
+Celastraceae
+collections from Goiás state, it is determined that
+
+M. macrodonta
+
+is conspecific with
+
+Monteverdia ilicifolia
+
+.
+
+Monteverdia ilicifolia
+
+is easily characterized by young twigs flattened or carinated, coriaceous leaves spirally arranged, leaf with one to seven pairs of spines regularly arranged in the margin or concentrated in the apex, and multi-flowered fasciculate inflorescence. The protologue of
+
+M. macrodonta
+
+does not mention locality, collector number, or date of collection. The collector number [
+2444
+] and the locality [Rio Pillano] included in this paper are taken from the label of the designated
+lectotype
+. According to Pohl’s itinerary, provided by
+Urban (1906)
+, he visited the Pilões river in the Brazilian state of Goiás twice between late
+March 1919
+and
+February 1820
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/21/7B/C2/217BC2A4A4225A07BD31FB265F842C3D.xml b/data/21/7B/C2/217BC2A4A4225A07BD31FB265F842C3D.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ba9dc3fc200
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/21/7B/C2/217BC2A4A4225A07BD31FB265F842C3D.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,355 @@
+
+
+
+The Dacini fruit flies of Borneo: an annotated checklist with 89 species including three new to science (Tephritidae, Dacinae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Doorenweerd, Camiel
+0000-0002-0418-4439
+Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, Entomology Section, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, 3050 Maile Way, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822 - 2231, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Chung, Arthur Y. C.
+0000-0002-9529-4114
+Sabah Forestry Department, Forest Research Centre, P. O. Box 1407, 90715 Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mustapeng, Andi Maryani A.
+0000-0001-5252-4226
+Sabah Forestry Department, Forest Research Centre, P. O. Box 1407, 90715 Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rubinoff, Daniel
+0000-0002-2732-3032
+Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, Entomology Section, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, 3050 Maile Way, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822 - 2231, USA
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-06-09
+
+
+1240
+
+
+305
+325
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1240.148768
+DC035B97-5EF7-4FBB-8589-36C59208E745
+
+
+
+
+
+Zeugodacus
+(
+Zeugodacus
+)
+cataracta
+Doorenweerd
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 5
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+.
+
+Male. “
+Malaysia
+:
+Sabah
+: Danum Valley Tembaling waterfall trail. WGS 84
+
+4.9506
+,
+117.8061
+
+
+3–5. xii. 2018
+
+Zingerone trap
+.
+Leg. D. Rubinoff
+&
+C. Doorenweerd.
+DNA sample ms 08933. ” Deposited at the
+University of Hawaii Insect Museum
+reg. no.
+
+UHIM
+
+. ms 08933
+
+.
+
+Paratype
+
+.
+One male
+. “
+Malaysia
+,
+Sabah
+, Danum Valley access road. WGS 84
+
+4.9689
+,
+117.8126
+
+3–5. xii. 2018
+Zingerone trap. Leg. D. Rubinoff & C. Doorenweerd. DNA sample ms 08929. ” Deposited at the
+Sabah
+Forestry Department Insect Collection reg. no.
+
+UHIM
+
+. ms 08929.
+
+
+
+
+Differential diagnosis.
+
+
+The wing pattern of
+
+Zeugodacus cataracta
+
+is strikingly different from any other species of
+Dacini
+, with a medial dark band that extends down to midway of cell
+dm
+, dark marking throughout cell
+br
+, and three dark smudges in the distal part of the wing. The species is further unique in having vein CuA
+2
+and A
+1
+merge at ~ 1 / 2 the length of A
+1
+, leaving a short cell
+cup
+, and all antennal segments are remarkably short, combined less than half the height of the head.
+
+
+
+
+Molecular diagnostics.
+
+
+The
+COI
+- 5 P 3 P sequences of ms 08929 and ms 08933 are most similar to published sequences of
+
+Zeugodacus scutellaris
+(Bezzi, 1913)
+
+, but at 8.9 % minimum pairwise difference (
+Doorenweerd et al. 2024 b
+).
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+
+Male.
+Head
+
+(Fig.
+5 C
+). Fulvous; face dark with indistinct oval black spots in the antennal furrows. Antennal segments dark fulvous and short, combined length less than half the height of the head.
+Thorax
+(Fig.
+5 A, D
+). Scutum and pleural areas black with narrow red-brown areas surrounding parts of the yellow markings. Yellow markings: postpronotal lobes; notopleura; presutural area adjacent to notopleura; postsutural yellow lateral vittae that narrow sharply posteriorly and do not reach intra-alar seta; medial elongate postsutural vitta; mesopleural stripe dorsally wider than notopleuron but does not reach postpronotal lobe; anatergite; katatergite. Scutellum yellow with a narrow black basal band. Setae: two pair scutellar; one pair prescutellar; one pair intra-alar; one pair posterior supra-alar; one pair anterior supra-alar; two pair notopleural and four scapular.
+Abdomen
+(Fig.
+5 B, E, F, H
+). Oval to diamond-shaped; terga free; pecten of setae on tergum III absent. Posterior lobe of the male surstylus long (Fig.
+5 F
+). Abdomen overall fulvous with interrupted black ‘ T’ on segments III –
+V
+. Anterolateral corners of segment
+IV
+black.
+Paratype
+with more extensive black lateral markings on tergum
+IV
+and
+V
+(Fig.
+5 H
+). Ceromata yellow and indistinct.
+Legs
+(Fig.
+5 D
+). Legs overall fulvous. Outer surface of the fore tibia black, distal third of hind tibia black.
+Wings
+(Fig.
+5 G
+). Wing length
+5.8 mm
+. Cells
+bc
+and
+c
+clear, faint tint in cell
+sc.
+Costal band confluent with vein
+R
+2 + 3
+and continues at more or less the same width until just past where vein
+R
+4 + 5
+reaches the costa. Anal streak absent, vein CuA
+2
+and A
+1
+merge at # 1 / 2 the length of A
+1
+. A medial dark band extends from the costal band down to midway of cell
+dm
+and dark marking throughout cell
+br.
+The distal part of the wing has three dark brown smudges below vein
+R
+4 + 5
+.
+Female.
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype male of
+
+Zeugodacus cataracta
+
+sp. nov.
+,
+UHIM
+. ms 08929
+A
+dorsal view of head and thorax
+B
+dorsal view of abdomen
+C
+anterior view of the head
+D
+lateral view
+E
+dorso-anterior view of the abdomen showing the ceromata
+F
+detail image of the genitalia showing the surstylus length
+G
+left wing, dissected and slide mounted
+H
+dorsal view of the abdomen of the paratype (ms 08929) showing variation in the abdomen markings.
+
+
+
+Male lure.
+Zingerone.
+
+
+
+
+Host plant.
+
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The species epithet
+cataracta
+, Latin for waterfall, is a noun in apposition that refers to both the peculiar wing pattern that resembles a waterfall going over the edge and the
+type
+locality; the Tembaling waterfall trail in the Danum Valley Conservation Area.
+
+
+
+
+Comments.
+
+
+This species was included as
+
+Zeugodacus
+
+‘ spnMalaysia 02 ’ in the DNA barcoding study of
+Doorenweerd et al. (2024 b
+). The combination of a short cell
+cup
+and antennae shorter than the height of the head makes accurate systematic placement of this species challenging. Within
+Dacini
+, this combination is only known in the monotypic
+
+Bactrocera
+subgenus Queenslandacus
+
+;
+
+B. exigua
+
+(May), known from
+Australia
+. However, the yellow presutural markings and long posterior lobes of the male surstylus clearly place this species in
+
+Zeugodacus
+
+, and we find placement in subgenus
+
+Zeugodacus
+
+best fitting and consider the similarity with
+
+B. exigua
+
+paralogous.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/3A/33/4A/3A334A530B295861BFAEBFA058163E70.xml b/data/3A/33/4A/3A334A530B295861BFAEBFA058163E70.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ec068e5d307
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/3A/33/4A/3A334A530B295861BFAEBFA058163E70.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,296 @@
+
+
+
+The Dacini fruit flies of Borneo: an annotated checklist with 89 species including three new to science (Tephritidae, Dacinae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Doorenweerd, Camiel
+0000-0002-0418-4439
+Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, Entomology Section, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, 3050 Maile Way, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822 - 2231, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Chung, Arthur Y. C.
+0000-0002-9529-4114
+Sabah Forestry Department, Forest Research Centre, P. O. Box 1407, 90715 Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mustapeng, Andi Maryani A.
+0000-0001-5252-4226
+Sabah Forestry Department, Forest Research Centre, P. O. Box 1407, 90715 Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rubinoff, Daniel
+0000-0002-2732-3032
+Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, Entomology Section, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, 3050 Maile Way, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822 - 2231, USA
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-06-09
+
+
+1240
+
+
+305
+325
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1240.148768
+DC035B97-5EF7-4FBB-8589-36C59208E745
+
+
+
+
+
+Dacus
+(
+Mellesis
+)
+danumensis
+Doorenweerd
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 4
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+.
+
+Male. “
+Malaysia
+:
+Sabah
+: Danum valley Tembaling waterfall trail. WGS 84
+
+4.9534
+,
+117.8062
+
+
+3–5. xii. 2018
+
+Zingerone trap
+.
+Leg. D. Rubinoff
+&
+C. Doorenweerd.
+DNA sample ms 08931. ” Deposited at the
+University of Hawaii Insect Museum
+reg. no.
+
+UHIM
+
+. ms 08931.
+
+
+
+
+
+Differential diagnosis.
+
+
+The combination of an elongate and petiolate (‘ wasp-like’) abdomen, a uniquely shaped postsutural medial yellow vitta that is almost equally wide as long, the wing with a costal band that reaches up to vein
+R
+4 + 5
+and does not expand apically, and the absence of an anal streak, is unique within
+Dacini
+. The most closely related species based on
+COI
+sequence data is
+
+Dacus sinensis
+Wang
+
+, from which
+
+D. danumensis
+
+can be morphologically distinguished by having a medial postsutural yellow vitta, which is absent in
+
+D. sinensis
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Molecular diagnostics.
+
+
+
+Dacus danumensis
+COI
+
+- 5 P 3 P sequences are most similar to sequences of
+
+D. sinensis
+
+at 8.6 % minimum pairwise difference (
+Doorenweerd et al. 2024 b
+).
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+
+Male.
+Head
+
+(Fig.
+4 B
+). Fulvous with two waterdrop-shaped black facial spots in the antennal furrows and a black band connecting both compound eyes across the occiput. Antennae dark fulvous. Combined length of antennal segments greater than the height of the head
+Thorax
+(Fig.
+4 A, C
+). Scutum and pleural areas completely black. Yellow markings: postpronotal lobes; notopleura and adjacent presutural area; medial postsutural roughly waterdrop-shaped vitta; mesopleural stripe approx. the width of the notopleuron, anterior margin slightly convex; anatergite, katatergite; scutellum. Setae: one pair scutellar; prescutellar setae absent; one pair intra-alar; one pair posterior supra-alar; one pair anterior supra-alar; two pair notopleural; four scapular.
+Abdomen
+(Fig.
+4 A, C, D, F
+). Abdomen shape petiolate with narrow and elongated segment I; terga fused; pecten present on tergum III; posterior lobe of the male surstylus short (Fig.
+4 F
+); abdominal sternum
+V
+with a narrow concavity on the posterior margin. Tergum I black with yellow posterior band; tergum II yellow with a black T-shape; tergum III with a second black T-shape that covers most of the segment and a medial black line that continuous from tergum II down to the posterior of tergum
+V
+; lateral black bands on tergum
+IV
+and
+V
+. Ceromata yellow and indistinct.
+Legs
+(Fig.
+4 C
+). Fore tibia with dark mark on the outer surface that covers most of the tibial length; mid tibia with dark marks on the outer and inner surface that extend from one-third the distal end; hind tibia with distal quarter black. All other leg segments yellow to fulvous.
+Wings
+(Fig.
+4 E
+). Wing length
+4.9 mm
+. Cells
+bc
+and
+c
+clear, faint tint in cell
+sc.
+Costal band reaches up to vein
+R
+4 + 5
+, slightly crosses
+R
+4 + 5
+apically. Anal streak absent, supernumerary lobe not pronounced.
+Female.
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype male of
+
+Dacus danumensis
+
+sp. n.
+,
+UHIM
+. ms 08931
+A
+dorsal view
+B
+anterior view of the head
+C
+lateral view
+D
+dorso-anterior view of the abdomen showing the ceromata
+E
+right wing, dissected and slide mounted
+F
+detail image of the genitalia showing the surstylus length.
+
+
+
+Male lure.
+Zingerone.
+
+
+
+
+Host plant.
+
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The species epithet
+danumensis
+is a noun in apposition that refers to the
+type
+locality; the Danum Valley Conservation Area in
+Sabah
+,
+Malaysia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Comments.
+
+
+This species was included as ‘
+
+Dacus
+
+spnMalaysia 01 ’ in the DNA barcoding study of
+Doorenweerd et al. (2024 b
+). Placement in subgenus
+
+Mellesis
+
+is based on lacking prescutellar setae, a slight concavity on the posterior margin of sternum
+V
+and its elongate and petiolate abdomen shape.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/47/66/5A/47665AA36DEA54A9A9D09D2210832D13.xml b/data/47/66/5A/47665AA36DEA54A9A9D09D2210832D13.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e3eb91638ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/47/66/5A/47665AA36DEA54A9A9D09D2210832D13.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,385 @@
+
+
+
+The Dacini fruit flies of Borneo: an annotated checklist with 89 species including three new to science (Tephritidae, Dacinae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Doorenweerd, Camiel
+0000-0002-0418-4439
+Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, Entomology Section, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, 3050 Maile Way, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822 - 2231, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Chung, Arthur Y. C.
+0000-0002-9529-4114
+Sabah Forestry Department, Forest Research Centre, P. O. Box 1407, 90715 Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mustapeng, Andi Maryani A.
+0000-0001-5252-4226
+Sabah Forestry Department, Forest Research Centre, P. O. Box 1407, 90715 Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Rubinoff, Daniel
+0000-0002-2732-3032
+Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, Entomology Section, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, 3050 Maile Way, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822 - 2231, USA
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-06-09
+
+
+1240
+
+
+305
+325
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1240.148768
+DC035B97-5EF7-4FBB-8589-36C59208E745
+
+
+
+
+
+Bactrocera
+(
+Bactrocera
+)
+melanobivittata
+Doorenweerd
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 2
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+.
+
+Male. “
+Malaysia
+:
+Sabah
+.
+
+3–5. xii. 2018
+
+. Danum Valley access rd.
+4.9683 " N, 117.8173 " E
+.
+Methyl eugenol trap
+FF 18 Ma 065.
+Leg. D. Rubinoff
+&
+C. Doorenweerd.
+DNA sample ms 12171 ”. Deposited at the
+University of Hawaii Insect Museum
+reg. no.
+
+UHIM
+
+. ms 12171
+
+.
+
+Paratype
+
+.
+One male
+. “
+Malaysia
+,
+Sabah
+.
+2–4. viii. 2019
+. Maliau Basin: camp Agathis trail.
+4.7079 " N, 116.8947 " E
+. Methyl eugenol trap FF 19 Ma 036. Leg. D. Rubinoff & C. Doorenweerd. DNA sample ms 08978. ” Deposited at the
+Sabah
+Forestry Department Insect Collection, reg. no.
+
+UHIM
+
+. ms 08978.
+
+
+
+
+Differential diagnosis.
+
+
+The two lateral longitudinal red stripes on the black scutum distinguish
+
+B. melanobivittata
+
+from most other
+
+Bactrocera
+
+. The most similar species is
+
+B. bivittata
+Lin & Wang
+
+, but
+
+B. melanobivittata
+
+can be distinguished by having a scutum that is almost completely black except for two longitudinal red stripes, and the yellow postsutural vittae. There is intraspecific variation in the amount of black on the scutum in
+
+B. bivittata
+
+(Fig.
+3
+) but the red stripes are obscured in darker colored specimens of
+
+B. bivittata
+
+whereas they are of roughly equal width and clearly contrasting in
+
+B. melanobivittata
+
+.
+
+Bactrocera melanobivittata
+
+can be distinguished from
+
+B. ellenriederae
+
+, which also has two red stripes on the scutum, by the costal band on the wing that ends between vein
+R
+4 + 5
+and M, while the costal band of
+
+B. ellenriederae
+
+reaches vein M, and
+
+B. melanobivittata
+
+is distinguished from
+
+B. youngi
+
+by having only the anterior lateral corners of tergite
+IV
+black, whereas
+
+B. youngi
+
+has the lateral quarters of tergite
+IV
+black. The most similar species in Borneo is
+
+B. lateritaenia
+
+, which can be distinguished by having tapering yellow postsutural vittae, which are parallel in
+
+B. melanobivittata
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Molecular diagnostics.
+
+
+The
+COI
+- 5 P 3 P sequences of ms 12171 and ms 08978 are most similar to sequences of
+
+Bactrocera bivittata
+
+, but at 6.5 % minimum pairwise difference (
+Doorenweerd et al. 2024 b
+).
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+
+Male.
+Head
+
+(Fig.
+2 C
+). Fulvous with oval black spots in the antennal furrows. Antennal segments fulvous to dark fulvous distally, combined length less than the height of the head.
+Thorax
+(Fig.
+2 A, B, D, E
+). Scutum and pleural areas all black with narrow red-brown areas surrounding the yellow markings. Two lateral longitudinal red stripes reach from the anterior of the scutum to half-way of the postsutural yellow vittae. Yellow markings: postpronotal lobes; notopleura; presutural area adjacent to notopleura; postsutural yellow lateral vittae of equal width throughout and reach just past intra-alar seta; mesopleural stripe dorsally wider than notopleuron but does not reach postpronotal lobe; anatergite and katatergite. Scutellum yellow with a narrow black basal band. Setae: one pair scutellar; one pair prescutellar; one pair intra-alar; one pair posterior supra-alar; one pair anterior supra-alar; two pair notopleural and four scapular.
+Abdomen
+(Fig.
+2 B, D, E, G
+). Diamond-shaped; terga free; pecten of setae on tergum III present. Dorsal side of abdomen fulvous with a black ‘ T’ on segments III –
+V
+, the medial line narrows posteriorly to a point on segment
+V
+. Anterolateral corners of segment
+IV
+black. Ceromata brown. Posterior lobe of the male surstylus short (Fig.
+2 G
+). Sternum
+V
+with a narrow concavity on the posterior margin.
+Legs
+(Fig.
+2 D
+). All femora and tibia fulvous.
+Wings
+(Fig.
+2 F
+). Wing length
+6.5 mm
+. Cells
+bc
+and
+c
+clear, faint tint in cell
+sc.
+Costal band confluent with vein
+R
+2 + 3
+and continues at more or less the same width until just past where vein
+R
+4 + 5
+reaches the costa. Anal streak absent, vein CuA
+2
+and A
+1
+merge at ~ 0.8 length of A
+1
+. Supernumerary lobe not pronounced, inconspicuous.
+Female.
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype male of
+
+Bactrocera melanobivittata
+
+sp. nov.
+,
+UHIM
+. ms 12171
+A
+dorsal view of head and thorax
+B
+dorsal view of abdomen
+C
+anterior view of the head
+D
+lateral view of habitus
+E
+posterior view of abdomen showing the ceromata
+F
+left wing, dissected and slide mounted
+G
+detail image of the genitalia showing the surstylus length.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Variation in dorsal scutum coloration of
+
+Bactrocera bivittata
+
+, sister species to
+
+B. melanobivittata
+
+sp. nov.
+Specimens from China and Laos, photographed in ethanol. University of Hawaii Insect Museum specimen identifiers, from left to right, top to bottom: ms 03606, ms 01304, ms 03607, ms 01305, ms 03604, ms 03609, ms 03608, and ms 01790.
+
+
+
+Male lure.
+Methyl eugenol.
+
+
+
+
+Host plant.
+
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The species epithet is a compound adjective formed from the Latin
+melano
+, meaning dark, and its nearest sister species
+B. bivittata
+, because it has an overall darker appearance of the latter.
+
+
+
+
+Comments.
+
+
+
+Bactrocera melanobivittata
+
+was included as
+B.
+‘ spMalaysia 05 ’ in the DNA barcoding study of
+Doorenweerd et al. (2024 b
+). It is placed in subgenus
+
+Bactrocera
+
+based on having a short posterior lobe of the male surstylus, sternum
+V
+has a narrow concavity on the posterior margin, lateral postsutural yellow vitta present, medial vitta is absent, one pair of prescutellar setae and the presence of a pair of anterior supra-alar seta.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/51/A5/EF/51A5EFBD0EDD54D4979AF4650B2C3157.xml b/data/51/A5/EF/51A5EFBD0EDD54D4979AF4650B2C3157.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1700a79cff6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/51/A5/EF/51A5EFBD0EDD54D4979AF4650B2C3157.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,584 @@
+
+
+
+On small huntsman spiders (Araneae, Philodromidae) occurring in Guizhou and Hubei provinces, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Jianshuang
+0000-0003-4010-3082
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Chengwen
+https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1258-5727
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhong, Yang
+0000-0002-0517-4582
+School of Nuclear Technology and Chemistry & Biology, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, Hubei, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-06-09
+
+
+1240
+
+
+327
+368
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1240.149456
+0E4DC11B-A4C8-42B4-BD8B-EE215725578F
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus paiki
+Jang, Lee, Yoo & Kim, 2024
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1
+,
+3 A, B
+,
+12
+,
+13
+,
+23 A, B
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus fuscomarginatus
+
+
+:
+
+Nakatsudi 1942: 14
+
+, fig. 5 A, B (
+♂
+; misidentified per
+
+
+Jang et al. 2024 a
+
+: 498
+
+);
+
+Paik 1979: 430
+
+, figs 40–60 (
+♂
+♀
+; misidentified per
+
+
+Jang et al. 2024 a
+
+: 498
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus spinitarsis
+
+
+:
+
+Kim and Jung 2001: 201
+
+, figs 66–68 (
+♂
+♀
+; misidentified per
+
+
+Jang et al. 2024 a
+
+: 498
+
+);
+
+Namkung 2002: 510
+
+, fig. 41.8 a, b (
+♂
+♀
+; misidentified per
+
+
+Jang et al. 2024 a
+
+: 498
+
+);
+
+Namkung 2003: 513
+
+, fig. 41.8 a, b (
+♂
+♀
+; misidentified per
+
+
+Jang et al. 2024 a
+
+: 498
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus poecilus
+
+
+:
+
+Kim and Lee 2017: 74
+
+, fig. 42 A – D (
+♂
+♀
+; misidentified per
+
+
+Jang et al. 2024 a
+
+: 498
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus paiki
+
+Jang et al. 2024 a
+: 498, fig. 1 A – K (
+♂
+♀
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Material examined.
+
+
+
+
+China
+
+:
+Guizhou Province
+
+: •
+
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+,
+Guiyang City
+,
+Wudang District
+,
+Dongfeng Town
+,
+Guizhou
+Education University
+;
+
+26.64 ° N
+,
+106.80 ° E
+
+;
+
+1071 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+25 May 2015
+
+;
+H. Yu
+et al. leg
+
+. •
+
+1 ♀
+(
+YHGY 325
+used for sequencing,
+GenBank
+accession numbers in
+Table
+1
+),
+Guiyang City
+,
+Kaiyang County
+,
+Longgang Town
+,
+Pingshan Village
+,
+Zijiang Rift Scenic Area
+;
+
+26.93 ° N
+,
+107.07 ° E
+
+;
+
+812 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+10 June 2022
+
+;
+H. Yu
+&
+Q. Lu
+leg.;
+Hubei Province
+
+: •
+
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+(
+1 ♂
+,
+YHPHI 005
+used for sequencing,
+GenBank
+accession numbers in
+Table
+1
+),
+Xianning City
+, Jiugongshan National Nature Reserve,
+Yunzhonghu Scenic Area
+;
+
+29.39 ° N
+,
+114.65 ° E
+
+;
+
+480 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+3 July 2020
+
+;
+Q. Lu
+et al. leg
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis and description.
+
+
+See
+Jang et al. (2024 a
+). Habitus as in Figs
+12 A – C
+,
+13 A – C
+. Male palp as in Fig.
+12 D – F
+, epigyne as in Fig.
+13 D, E
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus paiki
+
+, male, habitus (
+A – C
+) and left palp (
+D – F
+)
+A
+dorsal view
+B
+ventral view
+C
+lateral view
+D
+prolateral view
+E
+ventral view
+F
+retrolateral view (teal green dashed lines represent the contours of
+DTA
+,
+RTA
+and
+VTA
+). Abbreviations:
+aSDL
+= ascending part of sperm duct loop;
+Con
+= conductor;
+Cy
+= cymbium;
+dSDL
+= descending part of sperm duct loop;
+DTA
+= dorsal tibial apophysis;
+Em
+= embolus;
+EmB
+= embolic base;
+EmT
+= embolic tip;
+IR
+= intertegular retinaculum;
+RTA
+= retrolateral tibial apophysis;
+SD
+= sperm duct;
+Te
+= tegulum;
+VTA
+= ventral tibial apophysis. Scale bars: 1 mm (equal for
+A – C
+); 0.5 mm (equal for
+D – F
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus paiki
+
+, female, habitus (
+A – C
+) and epigyne (
+D, E
+)
+A
+dorsal view
+B
+ventral view
+C
+lateral view
+D
+ventral view
+E
+dorsal view. Abbreviations:
+CD
+= copulatory duct;
+EG
+= epigynal groove;
+FD
+= fertilisation duct;
+MS
+= median septum; R = receptaculum;
+rMS
+= rim of median septum (teal green line);
+rSEF
+= rim of sclerotised epigynal fold (blue line);
+SEF
+= sclerotised epigynal fold. Scale bars: 1 mm (equal for
+A – C
+); 0.2 mm (equal for
+D, E
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+China
+(
+Guizhou
+,
+Hubei
+; Fig.
+23
+),
+Korea
+.
+
+
+
+
+Comments.
+
+
+This species is easily confused with
+
+P. spinitarsis
+
+due to its similar genital morphology.
+Jang et al. (2024 a
+) described it as a new species based on specimens from
+Korea
+and pointed out that previous records of
+
+P. spinitarsis
+
+in
+Korea
+in multiple studies were likely misidentifications, most of which should be attributed to
+
+P. paiki
+
+. It appears that many records of
+
+P. spinitarsis
+
+in Chinese literature may also be misidentifications. However, since we have not examined the original specimens, our study is currently based on materials from Guizhou and Hubei provinces.
+
+
+Long et al. (2022)
+reported
+
+P. spinitarsis
+
+as a new record for
+Guizhou Province
+based on specimens from Guiyang City but did not provide diagnostic illustrations. Upon re-examining the specimens from
+Long et al. (2022)
+, we determined that they should all belong to
+
+P. paiki
+
+. Therefore, there is currently no confirmed record of
+
+P. spinitarsis
+
+in
+Guizhou
+. The newly available specimens indicate that this species is also distributed in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve,
+Guizhou Province
+(Fig.
+23 A
+).
+
+
+Several studies have recorded the presence of
+
+P. spinitarsis
+
+in
+Hubei
+, such as
+Zhao (1993)
+,
+Song and Zhu (1997)
+,
+Song et al. (1999)
+,
+Zhu and Zhang (2011)
+,
+Yin et al. (2012)
+,
+Zhang et al. (2022)
+, but did not provide specific distribution points or coordinates. Additionally, the diagnostic illustrations provided are relatively crude and were not based on specimens from
+Hubei
+. Therefore, the reported distribution of
+
+P. spinitarsis
+
+in
+Hubei
+remains questionable. Our various field trips in
+Hubei
+have not yielded any
+
+P. spinitarsis
+
+specimens. In contrast, paired specimens of
+
+P. paiki
+
+were obtained from Jiugongshan National Nature Reserve (Fig.
+23 B
+). This paper represents the first formal report of the distribution of
+
+P. paiki
+
+in
+Hubei Province
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/5C/66/49/5C66494BBC5E5EEAA427896890BAF57C.xml b/data/5C/66/49/5C66494BBC5E5EEAA427896890BAF57C.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2588620cb3a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/5C/66/49/5C66494BBC5E5EEAA427896890BAF57C.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,849 @@
+
+
+
+On small huntsman spiders (Araneae, Philodromidae) occurring in Guizhou and Hubei provinces, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Jianshuang
+0000-0003-4010-3082
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Chengwen
+https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1258-5727
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhong, Yang
+0000-0002-0517-4582
+School of Nuclear Technology and Chemistry & Biology, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, Hubei, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-06-09
+
+
+1240
+
+
+327
+368
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1240.149456
+0E4DC11B-A4C8-42B4-BD8B-EE215725578F
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus guiyang
+Long & Yu, 2022
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1
+,
+2 C, D
+,
+7
+,
+8
+,
+9
+,
+23 A
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus guiyang
+Long & Yu
+
+, in
+Long et al. 2022: 118
+
+, figs 2 A – D, 3 A – D (
+♂
+);
+
+Wang et al. 2024: 281
+
+, figs 1 A – D, 2 A – E, 8 A, 9 A, B (
+♂
+♀
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+material examined.
+
+
+
+
+
+China
+
+:
+Guizhou Province
+:
+
+Holotype
+
+•
+♂
+(
+YHGY 213
+used for sequencing, GenBank accession numbers in Table
+1
+),
+Guiyang City
+,
+Kaiyang County
+,
+Longgang Town
+,
+Pingshan Village
+,
+Zijiang Rift Scenic Area
+;
+
+26.93 ° N
+,
+107.07 ° E
+
+;
+
+812 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+10 June 2022
+
+;
+H. Yu
+&
+Q. Lu
+leg.
+
+
+
+
+Paratype
+
+
+•
+1 ♂
+, the same data as the holotype
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Other material examined.
+
+
+
+
+China
+
+:
+Guizhou Province
+: •
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+(
+1 ♀
+,
+MYHPHI 001
+used for sequencing, GenBank accession numbers in Table
+1
+),
+Tongren City
+,
+Mayanghe National Nature Reserve
+,
+Yanhe County
+,
+Huangtu Town
+;
+
+28.69 ° N
+,
+108.16 ° E
+
+;
+
+1194 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+8 August 2023
+
+;
+Y. Zhou
+et al. leg
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Females resemble those of
+
+P. subaureolus
+
+in having the similarly bell-shaped
+MS
+which is not delimited to
+SEF
+, but can be recognised by: (1) A comma-shaped (vs elongate-oval, nearly funnel-shaped) (cf. Fig.
+8 C, D, F
+and Fig.
+11 D
+); (2) anterior keel of
+MS
+relatively wider, ~ 1 / 5–1 / 4 epigyne width (vs distinctly narrower, ~ 1 / 10–1 / 8 epigyne width) (cf. Fig.
+8 D
+and Fig.
+11 D
+); (3)
+
+CD
+
+heavily sclerotised, not looped, distinctly thick and short, almost as thick as
+R
+, length ~ 1 / 2 epigyne (vs weakly sclerotised, distinctly thinner and longer, with a long
+cCD
+forming two loops before entering
+R
+, their thickness no more than 1 / 2 the diameter of
+R
+, length longer than epigyne) (cf. Fig.
+8 E, G
+and Fig.
+11 E
+); (4)
+R
+elongate-oval, anteriorly separated by ~ 0.5 × diameters, posteriorly separated by ~ 1.3 × diameters (vs nearly spherical, separated by ~ 1 diameter) (cf. Fig.
+8 E, G
+and Fig.
+11 E
+). Males of
+
+P. guiyang
+
+are also similar to those of
+
+P. subaureolus
+
+by the similar, blade-shaped
+VTA
+, lamellar
+
+RTA
+
+with a bifurcated tip, spine-shaped
+IR
+, and the more or less S-shaped
+SDL
+, but can be distinguished from the latter by: (1)
+Em
+claw-shaped, distinctly shorter, originating at the 10 o’clock position, terminating at the ~ 1 o’clock position (vs filiform, distinctly longer, originating at 8 o’clock position, terminating at ~ 1 o’clock position) (cf. Fig.
+9 A, C, D
+and Fig.
+10 D – F
+); (2)
+Con
+distinctly shorter, enveloping the second half of
+Em
+, the coverage ranges from the 11 o’clock to the 1 o’clock position (vs distinctly longer, almost enveloping the entire
+Em
+, the coverage ranges from the 9 o’clock to the 1 o’clock position) (cf. Fig.
+9 A, C, D
+and Fig.
+10 D – F
+); (3) in retrolateral view, the middle section of
+
+RTA
+
+distinctly narrower than its base and tip (vs not distinctly narrowed, the entire
+
+RTA
+
+is almost uniform in width) (cf. Fig.
+9 D
+and Fig.
+10 F
+); and (4)
+vRTA
+noticeably prominent, distinctly longer and sharper than
+dRTA
+(vs
+vRTA
+small, both branches of
+
+RTA
+
+are similar in size and shape) (cf. Fig.
+9 D
+and Fig.
+10 F
+).
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Female.
+Total length 4.05. Carapace 1.62 long, 1.57 wide. Abdomen 2.65 long, 1.82 wide.
+Eye sizes and interdistances
+:
+AME
+0.07,
+ALE
+0.07,
+PME
+0.06,
+PLE
+0.08,
+AME
+–
+AME
+0.19,
+AME
+–
+ALE
+0.10,
+PME
+–
+PME
+0.36,
+PME
+–
+PLE
+0.21,
+
+MOQL
+
+0.31,
+
+MOQA
+
+0.32,
+
+MOQP
+
+0.48,
+
+CH
+
+0.22. Sternum 0.89 long, 0.80 wide.
+Measurements of legs
+: I 6.50 (1.85, 2.38, 1.40, 0.87), II 7.88 (2.24, 2.92, 1.71, 1.01), III 5.42 (1.72, 1.88, 1.20, 0.62), IV 5.57 (1.77, 1.91, 1.25, 0.64). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Cheliceral furrow with one promarginal tooth.
+
+
+Colouration in ethanol
+(Figs
+7 A – C
+,
+8 A
+). Carapace nearly pear-shaped, ocular region distinctly narrowed, tegument relatively smooth, with numerous hair bases (all hairs detached); lateral bands dark brown, ~ 1 / 6 of carapace width, respectively; median band wide, ~ 2 / 3 of carapace width, bright yellowish-brown and distinctly delimited to lateral bands, centrally with V-shaped white stripe starting from behind
+PLE
+, almost reaching indistinct cervical groove; radial furrows and fovea indistinctly marked. Cheliceral base coloured slightly darker than median band, with pale brown fangs. Sternum uniformly yellowish-white. Endites and labium coloured as cheliceral base, both with dense scopulae on anterior margins. Legs yellowish-brown, without distinct markings, and covered by short spines. Abdomen elongate-oval, dorsum with a narrow, purplish median band starting from behind pedicel, reaching 1 / 2 of abdomen length; posteriorly with numerous purplish-black streaks interspersed with many pale brown spots, forming a reticulated pattern; ventral abdomen uniformly pale brownish.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus guiyang
+
+, female (
+A – C
+) and male (
+D – F
+), habitus
+A, D
+dorsal view
+B, E
+ventral view
+C, F
+lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm (equal for
+A – C
+, equal for
+D – F
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus guiyang
+
+, female (
+A, C – G
+) and male (
+B
+), frontal view of carapace (
+A, B
+) and epigyne (
+C – G
+)
+A
+female
+B
+male
+C
+intact, ventral view
+D
+macerated, ventral view
+E
+macerated, dorsal view
+F
+macerated and embedded in arabic gum, ventral view
+G
+macerated and embedded in Arabic gum, dorsal view. Abbreviations: A = atrium;
+CD
+= copulatory duct;
+CO
+= copulatory opening;
+FD
+= fertilisation duct;
+GM
+= glandular mound;
+MS
+= median septum; R = receptaculum;
+rMS
+= rim of median septum (teal green line);
+rSEF
+= rim of sclerotised epigynal fold (blue line);
+SEF
+= sclerotised epigynal fold. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (
+A, B
+); 0.2 mm (equal for
+C – G
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus guiyang
+
+, male, left palp
+A
+ventral view
+B
+dorsal view
+C
+prolateral view
+D
+retrolateral view. Abbreviations:
+aSDL
+= ascending part of sperm duct loop;
+Con
+= conductor;
+CP
+= cymbial process;
+Cy
+= cymbium;
+dRTA
+= dorsal branch of
+RTA
+;
+dSDL
+= descending part of sperm duct loop;
+Em
+= embolus;
+EmB
+= embolic base;
+EmT
+= embolic tip;
+IR
+= intertegular retinaculum;
+pCon
+= prolateral part of conductor;
+RTA
+= retrolateral tibial apophysis;
+SD
+= sperm duct;
+tCon
+= tip of conductor;
+Te
+= tegulum;
+vRTA
+= ventral branch of
+RTA
+;
+VTA
+= ventral tibial apophysis. Scale bar: 0.2 mm (equal for
+A – D
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus subaureolus
+
+, male, habitus (
+A – C
+) and left palp (
+D – F
+)
+A
+dorsal view
+B
+ventral view
+C
+lateral view
+D
+prolateral view
+E
+ventral view
+F
+retrolateral view. Abbreviations:
+aSDL
+= ascending part of sperm duct loop;
+Con
+= conductor;
+Cy
+= cymbium;
+dRTA
+= dorsal branch of
+RTA
+;
+dSDL
+= descending part of sperm duct loop;
+Em
+= embolus;
+EmB
+= embolic base;
+EmT
+= embolic tip;
+IR
+= intertegular retinaculum;
+pCon
+= prolateral part of conductor;
+RTA
+= retrolateral tibial apophysis;
+SD
+= sperm duct;
+tCon
+= tip of conductor;
+Te
+= tegulum;
+vRTA
+= ventral branch of
+RTA
+;
+VTA
+= ventral tibial apophysis. Scale bars: 1 mm (equal for
+A – C
+); 0.2 mm (equal for
+D – F
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Philodromus subaureolus
+
+, female, habitus (
+A – C
+) and epigyne (
+D, E
+)
+A
+dorsal view
+B
+ventral view
+C
+lateral view
+D
+ventral view
+E
+dorsal view. Abbreviations: A = atrium;
+cCD
+= course of copulatory duct (red line);
+CD
+= copulatory duct;
+CO
+= copulatory opening;
+FD
+= fertilisation duct;
+GM
+= glandular mound;
+MS
+= median septum; R = receptaculum;
+rMS
+= rim of median septum (teal green line);
+rSEF
+= rim of sclerotised epigynal fold (blue line);
+SEF
+= sclerotised epigynal fold. Scale bars: 1 mm (equal for
+A – C
+); 0.2 mm (equal for
+D, E
+).
+
+
+
+Epigyne
+(Fig.
+8 C – G
+). Epigynal field slightly longer than wide; anterior and lateral margins not delimited, posterior margin rebordered; the arrangement of the various parts of the vulva (
+
+CD
+
+and
+R
+) are distinctly visible through integument. A small, located at anterior part of epigynal plate, divided by anterior keel of
+MS
+, represented by two comma-shaped cavities; the two cavities separated by ~ 1 diameter.
+MS
+bell-shaped, broad; anteriorly narrowed abruptly, ~ 1 / 5 epigyne width, with distinct edges and distinctly delimited to A; posteriorly widen gradually, ~ 1 / 2 epigyne width, with indistinct lateral
+rMS
+alongside with
+rSEF
+.
+SEF
+anteriorly and posteriorly narrowed, medially widened, ~ 1 / 3 epigyne width, not delimited to
+MS
+.
+CO
+indistinct, located at basolateral atrial borders, leading to
+
+CD
+
+which extend to connect with
+R
+.
+
+CD
+
+distinctly thick and heavily sclerotised, almost as thick as
+R
+, ~ 1 / 4 epigyne width; anteriorly convergent on the central axis, posteriorly descend obliquely, separated by ~ 1 diameter, finally connected to
+R
+at midlength of epigyne.
+R
+elongate-oval, ~ 1 / 2 epigyne length and 1 / 4 epigyne width, arranged obliquely; anteriorly separated by ~ 0.5 × diameter, posteriorly separated by ~ 1.3 × diameter.
+
+GM
+
+distinctly small, represented by small humps that locate at the antero-lateral surfaces of
+R
+.
+FD
+membranous and acicular, large, ~ 2 / 3 of
+R
+length, originating from the posterior surface of
+R
+, anterolaterally extending.
+
+
+Male.
+Total length 3.25. Carapace 1.49 long, 1.42 wide. Abdomen 1.76 long, 1.15 wide.
+Eye sizes and interdistances
+:
+AME
+0.07,
+ALE
+0.06,
+PME
+0.06,
+PLE
+0.08,
+AME
+–
+AME
+0.16,
+AME
+–
+ALE
+0.08,
+PME
+–
+PME
+0.30,
+PME
+–
+PLE
+0.19,
+
+MOQL
+
+0.30,
+
+MOQA
+
+0.30,
+
+MOQP
+
+0.41,
+
+CH
+
+0.19. Sternum 0.89 long, 0.81 wide.
+Measurements of legs
+: I 7.78 (1.99, 2.66, 1.92, 1.21), II 9.70 (2.59, 3.27, 2.37, 1.47), III 6.05 (1.87, 2.01, 1.41, 0.76), IV 5.23 (1.79, 1.88, 1.03, 0.53). Leg formula: II-I-III-IV. Cheliceral furrow with one promarginal teeth. Colouration in ethanol as in females, but body slightly paler (Figs
+7 D – F
+,
+8 B
+; see
+Long et al. (2022)
+for others described).
+
+
+Palp
+(Fig.
+9 A – D
+). Tibia relatively long, ~ 2 / 3 of
+Cy
+length, with two apophyses arising distally from tibia. Both tibial apophyses are lamellar and almost equal in length, nearly as long as palpal tibia length, including: a weakly sclerotised
+VTA
+, blade-shaped in ventral view and finger-shaped in lateral views; and a more sclerotised
+
+RTA
+
+which with wide base, narrowed middle section, and more or less biforked tip; both branches of
+
+RTA
+
+nearly triangular,
+vRTA
+heavily sclerotised, surface and edges smooth, apex angle is approximately 30 °,
+dRTA
+hyaline, surface rough and with several scratch-like textures, distal edge jagged, apex angle is approximately 90 °.
+Cy
+distinctly longer than tibia, basoretrolaterally with an indistinct
+CP
+.
+Te
+oval, ~ 1.37 longer than wide, proximally slightly swollen, prolatero-apically slightly excavated to accommodate
+Em
+and
+Con
+.
+SD
+sinuate, originating at distal portion of
+Te
+, aligning clockwise along the tegular retrolateral margin, forming a S-shaped
+SDL
+in ventral view, finally terminating at the ~ 10 o’clock position, and entering
+EmB
+.
+Em
+claw-shaped,
+EmB
+thick, inserted prolatero-apically (approximately 10 o’clock relative to
+Te
+), gradually tapering toward apex;
+EmT
+sharp and retrolaterally pointed, terminating at ~ 1 o’clock position.
+Con
+membranous, axe-shaped, aligning transversely on apical part of the
+Te
+, enveloping the second half of
+Em
+.
+IR
+distinctly small, spine-shaped, located at the ~ 2 o’clock position.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+China
+(
+Fujian
+,
+Guizhou
+,
+Hunan
+,
+Jiangxi
+; distribution records in
+Guizhou
+as in Fig.
+23 A
+).
+
+
+
+
+Comments.
+
+
+Long et al. (2022)
+described the
+holotype
+male of
+
+P. guiyang
+
+in Chinese in the original paper.
+Wang et al. (2024)
+later described the female of the species for the first time but did not provide a diagnosis and redescription for the male. Therefore, to date, the male of this species lacks an English description. Here we diagnose and describe the male in English for the first time. Newly available specimens indicate that the species is also distributed in Mayanghe National Nature Reserve in
+Guizhou Province
+(Fig.
+23 A
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/6B/A9/B4/6BA9B40A88D7506FAA926CD4C5DD202A.xml b/data/6B/A9/B4/6BA9B40A88D7506FAA926CD4C5DD202A.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fcb9eb0ba1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/6B/A9/B4/6BA9B40A88D7506FAA926CD4C5DD202A.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+
+
+
+On small huntsman spiders (Araneae, Philodromidae) occurring in Guizhou and Hubei provinces, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Jianshuang
+0000-0003-4010-3082
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Chengwen
+https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1258-5727
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhong, Yang
+0000-0002-0517-4582
+School of Nuclear Technology and Chemistry & Biology, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, Hubei, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-06-09
+
+
+1240
+
+
+327
+368
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1240.149456
+0E4DC11B-A4C8-42B4-BD8B-EE215725578F
+
+
+
+
+Genus
+
+Tibellus
+Simon, 1875
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+species.
+
+
+
+
+Aranea oblonga
+Walckenaer, 1802
+
+from North America, Europe, North Africa,
+Turkey
+,
+Israel
+, Caucasus,
+Russia
+(Europe to Far East),
+Kazakhstan
+,
+Iran
+, Central Asia,
+Mongolia
+,
+China
+,
+Korea
+,
+Japan
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+See
+
+Van
+den Berg and Dippenaar-Schoeman (1994)
+
+and
+Efimik (1999)
+.
+
+
+
+
+Comments.
+
+
+The genus has been widely considered as putatively monophyletic; it presents a distinct set of characters (
+
+Van
+den Berg and Dippenaar-Schoeman 1994
+
+;
+Efimik 1999
+;
+Jang et al. 2023
+), and its species composition is relatively stable (
+WSC 2025
+). However, some species have extraordinarily intraspecific morphological variation and low levels of interspecific variation, and together with the insufficiency of alpha taxonomic information (lacking high-quality illustrations, detailed descriptions, and molecular data), have hindered species recognition and has resulted in several wrong descriptions and misidentifications (
+Efimik 1999
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/B7/C1/84/B7C1840AFBB0593484F10AE3D37D649E.xml b/data/B7/C1/84/B7C1840AFBB0593484F10AE3D37D649E.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2ea29c80244
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/B7/C1/84/B7C1840AFBB0593484F10AE3D37D649E.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+
+
+
+On small huntsman spiders (Araneae, Philodromidae) occurring in Guizhou and Hubei provinces, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Jianshuang
+0000-0003-4010-3082
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Chengwen
+https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1258-5727
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhong, Yang
+0000-0002-0517-4582
+School of Nuclear Technology and Chemistry & Biology, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, Hubei, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-06-09
+
+
+1240
+
+
+327
+368
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1240.149456
+0E4DC11B-A4C8-42B4-BD8B-EE215725578F
+
+
+
+
+Genus
+
+Philodromus
+Walckenaer, 1826
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+species.
+
+
+
+
+Araneus aureolus
+Clerck, 1757
+
+from Europe,
+Turkey
+, Caucasus,
+Russia
+(Europe to Central Asia and Middle Siberia),
+Kazakhstan
+,
+Iran
+, Central Asia,
+Mongolia
+,
+China
+,
+Korea
+,
+Japan
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+See
+Dondale and Redner (1976)
+.
+
+
+
+
+Comments.
+
+
+
+Philodromus
+
+is the
+type
+genus of
+Philodromidae
+and currently includes 214 extant species that are found worldwide except for the Polar Regions (mainly distributed in the Old World and North America, except three from
+Australia
+and only one recorded in South America respectively) (
+WSC 2025
+), 21 species of which have been recorded from
+China
+. This genus is one of the largest of
+Philodromidae
+and comprises 41 % of the total number of species of the family (
+WSC 2025
+).
+
+
+Although
+
+Philodromus
+
+is rather well known for its high species diversity, the genus remains inadequately studied, and the species diversity is still insufficiently known (mostly related to its alpha taxonomy). The possible reasons include, but are not limited to the following: almost half of the species are described based on a single sex or juveniles (15 from males only, 79 from females only, eight from juveniles only) (
+WSC 2025
+); for many species described in earlier studies, original descriptions are rather brief, and illustrations are absent or inadequate (
+Long et al. 2022
+;
+WSC 2025
+); and the lack of available molecular data – we can obtain
+
+COI
+
+sequences for only 45 species through
+NCBI (2025
+).
+
+
+The insufficiency of fundamental information in alpha taxonomy poses a significant obstacle to the advancement of beta taxonomy (i. e., phylogenetic studies). Several major taxonomic studies on a regional scale have been conducted, e. g.,
+Dondale (1961
+,
+1963
+), and
+Dondale and Redner (1968
+,
+1969
+,
+1975
+,
+1976
+,
+1978
+) for the North American species, Muster and his coauthors (
+Muster and Thaler 2004
+;
+Muster et al. 2007
+;
+Muster 2009
+), and
+Wunderlich (2012)
+for the European species; however, these revisionary studies often exclude species from Asia (potentially due to the aforementioned lack of foundational taxonomic information), and the debate on the group’s limits and internal structure of this family remains open (
+WSC 2025
+). According to the quite diverse copulatory structures of both sexes, different camouflage behaviours and habitat preferences,
+
+Philodromus
+
+sensu lato
+has been regarded as paraphyletic and needs to be split (
+Wunderlich 2012
+). However, we agree with
+Muster (2009)
+that the elevation of an autapomorphic species group would render
+
+Philodromus
+
+paraphyletic and in need of an extensive, large-scale review of the genus. Consequently, the present study follows the
+WSC (2025
+), and places all treated species in
+
+Philodromus
+
+sensu lato
+. We provide only the fundamental information on these species (such as detailed descriptions, supplementary illustrations, and DNA barcodes) for species delimitation, matching of sexes and future use. A review of the genus is not within the scope of this work.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/DA/2C/84/DA2C8499E59659E6BFA415F38CA7339F.xml b/data/DA/2C/84/DA2C8499E59659E6BFA415F38CA7339F.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7276f39936a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/DA/2C/84/DA2C8499E59659E6BFA415F38CA7339F.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+
+
+
+On small huntsman spiders (Araneae, Philodromidae) occurring in Guizhou and Hubei provinces, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Jianshuang
+0000-0003-4010-3082
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Chengwen
+https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1258-5727
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhong, Yang
+0000-0002-0517-4582
+School of Nuclear Technology and Chemistry & Biology, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, Hubei, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-06-09
+
+
+1240
+
+
+327
+368
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1240.149456
+0E4DC11B-A4C8-42B4-BD8B-EE215725578F
+
+
+
+
+Genus
+
+Sinodromus
+Yao & Liu, 2024
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+species.
+
+
+
+
+Sinodromus fujianensis
+Yao & Liu, 2024
+
+from
+Fujian
+and
+Jiangxi
+provinces,
+China
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+See
+Wang et al. (2024)
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/FA/D0/4B/FAD04B0075A15956A2F39A3A4EBABB51.xml b/data/FA/D0/4B/FAD04B0075A15956A2F39A3A4EBABB51.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7b5abe1e7e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/FA/D0/4B/FAD04B0075A15956A2F39A3A4EBABB51.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,732 @@
+
+
+
+On small huntsman spiders (Araneae, Philodromidae) occurring in Guizhou and Hubei provinces, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Jianshuang
+0000-0003-4010-3082
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Chengwen
+https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1258-5727
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhong, Yang
+0000-0002-0517-4582
+School of Nuclear Technology and Chemistry & Biology, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, Hubei, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-06-09
+
+
+1240
+
+
+327
+368
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1240.149456
+0E4DC11B-A4C8-42B4-BD8B-EE215725578F
+
+
+
+
+
+Sinodromus lanyue
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1
+,
+4 A, B
+,
+16
+,
+17
+,
+18
+,
+19
+,
+20
+,
+23 B
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+material.
+
+
+
+
+
+China
+
+:
+Hubei Province
+:
+
+Holotype
+
+•
+♂
+:
+Xianning City
+,
+Xianan District
+,
+Hubei
+University of Science
+and
+Technology
+, the bamboo forest on the hill behind
+Lanyue Lake
+;
+
+29.85 ° N
+,
+114.34 ° E
+
+;
+
+22 March 2023
+
+;
+Y. Zhong
+&
+Q. Lu
+leg. (Inventory number:
+
+MGNU
+
+- 2025 -
+PHISL 001
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+Paratypes
+
+
+•
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+(Inventory number:
+
+MGNU
+
+- 2025 -
+PHISL 002
+~ 003), the same data as the holotype
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Other material examined.
+
+
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+(
+YHPHI
+008 and
+YHPHI
+009 used for sequencing, GenBank accession numbers in Table
+1
+), the same data as the
+holotype
+.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The species name is derived from the
+type
+locality; noun in apposition.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Males of the new species are easily distinguished from
+
+Sinodromus fujianensis
+Yao & Liu, 2024
+
+(only congener with described male) by the following combination of morphological characteristics: (1)
+
+TA
+
+shaped like a cock’s head, with a hump-like, not folded basal apophysis (vs horn-shaped, with a lamellar, folded basal apophysis) (cf. Figs
+16 A
+,
+17 A, B
+,
+18 A, C, D
+and
+Wang et al. 2024
+: figs 4 B – E, 5 C, G, I, K); and (2)
+Con
+wider than
+
+TA
+
+, surface relatively smooth (vs narrower than
+
+TA
+
+, with many scaly serrations) (cf. Figs
+16 A
+,
+17 A, B
+,
+18 A – D
+and
+Wang et al. 2024
+: figs 4 B – E, 5 C, G, I, K). Females of the new species resemble those of
+
+S. perbrevis
+Yao & Liu,
+2024 in
+
+having a similar
+MS
+and endogyne but can be recognised by: (1)
+
+ET
+
+axe-shaped, distinctly widened, wider than midsection of
+SEF
+(vs ear-shaped, not widened, nearly as wide as midsection of
+SEF
+) (cf. Fig.
+19 A, C, E
+and
+Wang et al. 2024
+: figs 7 C, 8 C); and (2)
+R
+oval, close together (vs globular, widely separated) (cf. Fig.
+19 B, D
+and
+Wang et al. 2024
+: fig. 7 D).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Sinodromus lanyue
+
+sp. nov.
+, paratype female (
+A – E, G
+) and holotype male (
+F
+), epigyne (
+A – E
+) and frontal view of carapace (
+F, G
+)
+A
+macerated, ventral view
+B
+macerated, dorsal view
+C
+macerated and embedded in arabic gum, ventral view
+D
+macerated and embedded in arabic gum, dorsal view
+E
+intact, ventral view
+F
+male
+G
+female. Abbreviations: A = atrium;
+cCD
+= course of copulatory duct (red line);
+CD
+= copulatory duct;
+CO
+= copulatory opening;
+ET
+= epigynal tooth;
+FD
+= fertilisation duct;
+GM
+= glandular mound;
+MS
+= median septum; R = receptaculum;
+rMS
+= rim of median septum (teal green line);
+rSEF
+= rim of sclerotised epigynal fold (blue line);
+SEF
+= sclerotised epigynal fold. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (
+A – E
+); 0.5 mm (equal for
+F, G
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+
+Male (
+
+MGNU
+
+- 2025 -
+PHISL
+001).
+
+Total length 3.64. Carapace 1.46 long, 1.29 wide. Abdomen 2.29 long, 0.93 wide.
+Eye sizes and interdistances
+:
+AME
+0.05,
+ALE
+0.05,
+PME
+0.03,
+PLE
+0.06,
+AME
+–
+AME
+0.16,
+AME
+–
+ALE
+0.10,
+PME
+–
+PME
+0.23,
+PME
+–
+PLE
+0.24,
+
+MOQL
+
+0.21,
+
+MOQA
+
+0.26,
+
+MOQP
+
+0.29,
+
+CH
+
+0.15. Sternum 0.87 long, 0.68 wide.
+Measurements of legs
+: I 6.03 (1.76, 2.23, 1.56, 1.38, 0.66), II 7.61 (2.18, 1.38, 2.03, 1.78, 0.89), III 4.94 (1.6, 1.67, 1.08, 0.59), IV 5.94 (1.91, 1.95, 1.43, 0.65). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Cheliceral furrow with one promarginal tooth.
+
+
+Colouration in ethanol
+(Figs
+19 F
+,
+20 A – C
+). Carapace basically yellow-brown, nearly pear-shaped, ocular region distinctly narrowed, tegument relatively smooth; with three pairs of indistinct, brown, longitudinal stripes, each one including dense black spots: the central pair starting from
+PLE
+, extending obliquely at front and vertically at rear, forming a funnel shape, or shaped like capital letter ‘ Y’; the second pair also starting from
+PLE
+and extending almost vertically; the third pair running along the edge of the carapace, slightly curved, resembling a pair of parentheses. Chelicerae coloured slightly paler than carapace, cheliceral base with sparse black spots. Sternum uniformly yellowish-white, laterally with many black dots. Endites and labium coloured as cheliceral base, both with dense scopulae on anterior margins. All legs proximally yellowish-white (coxae, trochanters, and femora), distally brown (patellae, tibiae, metatarsi, and tarsi), with many small black dots on dorsal and lateral surfaces, covered by short spines. Abdomen elongate-oval, dorsum brown, clothed with dense hairs and covered by countless black spots, with two pairs of longitudinal, white lines, reaching entire abdominal length: the central pair anteriorly long and widely separated, posteriorly short and convergent, shaped like a tuning fork; the lateral pair running along the edge of the abdomen, almost ascending parallel; ventral abdomen basically yellowish-white, marked with small dense black dots.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Sinodromus lanyue
+
+sp. nov.
+, holotype male (
+A – C
+) and paratype female (
+D – F
+), habitus
+A, D
+dorsal view
+B, E
+ventral view
+C, F
+lateral view Scale bars: 1 mm (equal for
+A – C
+, equal for
+D – F
+).
+
+
+
+Palp
+(Figs
+16 A, B
+,
+17 A, B
+,
+18 A – D
+). Tibia relatively long, ~ 2 / 3 of
+Cy
+length, with two apophyses arising distally from tibia:
+
+VPTA
+
+relatively short, ~ 1 / 6–1 / 5 tibia length, subtriangular and nearly erect in ventral view, distinctly curved and dorsally toward posterior part of
+Te
+in prolateral view;
+
+RTA
+
+bifurcated, with a membranous, thumb-like
+dRTA
+and a relatively sclerotised, dagger-like
+vRTA
+,
+vRTA
+relatively long, ~ 1 / 3 tibia length, twice longer than
+dRTA
+.
+Cy
+~ 1.9 × longer than wide, basoretrolaterally with an indistinct
+CP
+.
+Te
+egg-shaped, ~ 1.55 × longer than wide, proximally slightly swollen, prolatero-apically slightly excavated to accommodate
+Em
+and
+Con
+.
+SD
+sinuate, originating at retrolatero-distal portion of
+Te
+, proximally aligning clockwise along the tegular retrolateral margin, medially forming a S-shaped
+SDL
+in ventral view, with its distal end hidden behind
+Te
+and covered by
+Con
+, ultimately entering
+EmB
+.
+Em
+distinctly simplified and small, ~ 1 / 4
+Te
+length, slightly curved, spine-like;
+EmT
+sharply pointed and directed retrolatero-distally, terminating at ~ 1 o’clock position.
+Con
+weakly sclerotised, with moderate size, ~ 1 / 3
+Te
+length, basally columnar and slightly torqued along its length, apex triangular and terminating at ~ 1 o’clock position, covers
+Em
+.
+
+TA
+
+heavily sclerotised, shaped like a cock’s head, with a hump-like basal apophysis directed anteriorly and a sharp, beak-like apex pointing retrolaterally.
+
+
+
+Female (
+
+MGNU
+
+- 2025 -
+PHISL
+002).
+
+Total length 3.93. Carapace 1.45 long, 1.31 wide. Abdomen 2.66 long, 1.14 wide.
+Eye sizes and interdistances
+:
+AME
+0.05,
+ALE
+0.05,
+PME
+0.03,
+PLE
+0.06,
+AME
+–
+AME
+0.19,
+AME
+–
+ALE
+0.11,
+PME
+–
+PME
+0.28,
+PME
+–
+PLE
+0.25,
+
+MOQL
+
+0.21,
+
+MOQA
+
+0.28,
+
+MOQP
+
+0.34,
+
+CH
+
+0.17. Sternum 0.88 long, 0.64 wide.
+Measurements of legs
+: I 4.73 (1.36, 1.81, 1.16, 0.99, 0.57), II 5.37 (1.64, 1.93, 1.31, 1.14, 0.66), III 4.32 (1.4, 1.50, 0.92, 0.5), IV 5.21 (1.73, 1.76, 1.14, 0.58). Leg formula: II-IV-I-III. Cheliceral furrow with one promarginal tooth. Colouration in ethanol as in males, but body slightly paler (Figs
+19 G
+,
+20 D – F
+).
+
+
+Epigyne
+(Fig.
+19 A – E
+). Epigynal field slightly wider than long; anterior and lateral margins not rebordered, posterior margin delimited;
+
+CD
+
+and
+R
+obscured through epigynal plate in ventral view. A small, located at antero-lateral part of epigynal plate, divided by anterior keel of
+MS
+, represented by two C-shaped depressions; the two depressions separated by ~ five diameters.
+MS
+more or less U-shaped, or vase-shaped, broad; anterior keel slightly narrowed, ~ 2 / 5 epigyne width, with distinct edges and delimited to A; medial stem slightly widened, ~ 1 / 2 epigyne width; posterior base nearly as wide as anterior keel; both middle stem and posterior base with indistinct lateral
+rMS
+alongside with
+rSEF
+.
+SEF
+shaped like a pair of parentheses; anteriorly distinctly widened, forming axe-shaped
+
+ET
+
+; midsection narrowed, with distinct edges and delimited to A; posteriorly widened,
+rSEF
+not distinct and alongside with
+rMS
+.
+CO
+indistinct, located at antero-lateral borders of
+MS
+, leading to
+
+CD
+
+which looped to connect with
+R
+.
+
+CD
+
+relatively short, ~ 1 / 4 epigyne length, with a course forming one loop before entering
+R
+.
+R
+close together, oval, ~ 1.2 × longer than wide, ~ 1 / 2 epigyne length and 1 / 3 epigyne width; receptacular surface hyaline and smooth, inside pigmented, sclerotised and granular.
+
+GM
+
+distinctly small, slightly protruding, papilliform, located at the antero-lateral surfaces of
+R
+.
+FD
+membranous and acicular, moderately long, ~ 2 / 5 of
+R
+length, originating from the posterior surface of
+R
+, directing antero-laterally.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Known from the
+type
+locality in
+Hubei Province
+,
+China
+(Fig.
+23 B
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/FF/F2/4D/FFF24DD002B45D6DBEC999D53444FF12.xml b/data/FF/F2/4D/FFF24DD002B45D6DBEC999D53444FF12.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4c040f57aee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/FF/F2/4D/FFF24DD002B45D6DBEC999D53444FF12.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,518 @@
+
+
+
+On small huntsman spiders (Araneae, Philodromidae) occurring in Guizhou and Hubei provinces, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Jianshuang
+0000-0003-4010-3082
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Chengwen
+https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1258-5727
+School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhong, Yang
+0000-0002-0517-4582
+School of Nuclear Technology and Chemistry & Biology, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, Hubei, China
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-06-09
+
+
+1240
+
+
+327
+368
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1240.149456
+0E4DC11B-A4C8-42B4-BD8B-EE215725578F
+
+
+
+
+
+Tibellus japonicus
+Efimik, 1999
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1
+,
+4 C, D
+,
+21
+,
+22
+,
+23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Tibellus tenellus
+
+
+:
+
+Bösenberg and Strand 1906: 271
+
+, pl. 8, fig. 112, pl. 10, fig. 156 (
+♂
+♀
+; misidentified per
+
+Efimik 1999: 112
+
+);
+
+Chikuni 1989: 133
+
+, fig. 2 (
+♂
+♀
+; misidentified per
+
+Efimik 1999: 112
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Tibellus japonicus
+
+Efimik, 1999: 112
+, figs 35, 46, 52, 65 (
+♀
+);
+
+Chen et al. 2003: 91
+
+, figs 1–5 (
+♂
+♀
+);
+
+Ono and Ban 2009: 478
+
+, figs 24–27 (
+♂
+♀
+);
+
+Yin et al. 2012: 1252
+
+, fig. 673 a – d (
+♂
+♀
+);
+
+Jang et al. 2023: 278
+
+, fig. 4 A – H (
+♂
+).
+
+4
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Material examined.
+
+
+
+
+China
+
+:
+Guizhou Province
+: •
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+(
+YHGY 301
+and
+YHGY 303
+used for sequencing,
+GenBank
+accession numbers in
+Table
+1
+),
+Guiyang City
+,
+Yunyan District
+,
+Luchongguan Forest Park
+;
+
+26.63 ° N
+,
+106.70 ° E
+
+;
+
+1310 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+4 June 2022
+
+;
+H. Yu
+et al. leg
+
+. •
+
+1 ♀
+(
+YHGY 014
+used for sequencing,
+GenBank
+accession numbers in
+Table
+1
+),
+Guiyang City
+,
+Wudang District
+,
+Panlongshan Forest Park
+;
+
+26.74 ° N
+,
+106.88 ° E
+
+;
+
+1172 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+2 June 2022
+
+;
+H. Yu
+et al. leg
+
+. •
+
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+,
+Tongren City
+,
+Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve
+,
+Yinjiang Tujia
+and
+Miao Autonomous County
+,
+Tianqing Temple
+;
+
+28.00 ° N
+,
+108.74 ° E
+
+;
+
+1462 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+21 July 2021
+
+;
+H. Yu
+et al. leg
+
+. •
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Zunyi City
+,
+Xishui National Nature Reserve
+,
+Xishui County
+,
+Donghuang Town
+,
+Changqiangou Village
+;
+
+28.40 ° N
+,
+106.18 ° E
+
+;
+
+981 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+28 May 2022
+
+;
+H. Yu
+et al. leg.;
+Hubei Province
+
+: •
+
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+,
+Xianning City
+,
+Jiugongshan National Nature Reserve
+,
+Yunzhonghu Scenic Area
+;
+
+29.39 ° N
+,
+114.65 ° E
+
+;
+
+480 m
+a. s. l.
+
+;
+
+3 July 2020
+
+;
+Q. Lu
+et al. leg
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis and description.
+
+
+See
+Efimik (1999)
+,
+Chen et al. (2003)
+,
+Yin et al. (2012)
+, and
+Jang et al. (2023)
+. Habitus as in Figs
+21 A – C
+,
+22 A – C
+. Male palp as in Fig.
+21 D – F
+, epigyne as in Fig.
+22 D, E
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Tibellus japonicus
+
+, male, habitus (
+A – C
+) and left palp (
+D – F
+)
+A
+dorsal view
+B
+ventral view
+C
+lateral view
+D
+prolateral view
+E
+ventral view
+F
+retrolateral view. Abbreviations:
+aSDL
+= ascending part of sperm duct loop;
+Con
+= conductor;
+Cy
+= cymbium;
+dSDL
+= descending part of sperm duct loop;
+EmB
+= embolic base;
+EmT
+= embolic tip;
+RTA
+= retrolateral tibial apophysis;
+SD
+= sperm duct;
+Te
+= tegulum. Scale bars: 1 mm (equal for
+A – C
+); 0.2 mm (equal for
+D – F
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Tibellus japonicus
+
+, female, habitus (
+A – C
+) and epigyne (
+D, E
+)
+A
+dorsal view
+B
+ventral view
+C
+lateral view
+D
+ventral view
+E
+dorsal view. Abbreviations:
+CO
+= copulatory opening;
+FD
+= fertilisation duct;
+GM
+= glandular mound;
+MS
+= median septum; R = receptaculum. Scale bars: 2 mm (equal for
+A – C
+); 0.2 mm (equal for
+D, E
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Distribution records of the philodromid species in Guizhou Province (
+A
+) and Hubei Province (
+B
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Comments.
+
+
+The species was reported as a new record for
+China
+by
+Chen et al. (2003)
+based on materials from Xishui National Nature Reserve in
+Guizhou
+. Subsequent literature has reported the distribution of this species in
+Henan
+and
+Hunan
+provinces (
+Zhu and Zhang 2011
+;
+Yin et al. 2012
+). Newly available specimens indicate that the species is also distributed in Guiyang City and Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve in
+Guizhou Province
+(Fig.
+23 A
+), as well as Jiugongshan National Nature Reserve in
+Hubei Province
+(Fig.
+23 B
+). This paper provides the first formal report of the species’ distribution in
+Hubei Province
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file