From 26715e075f059b16a4a5bd3abd9abd678e9e80a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ggserver Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 12:09:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add updates up until 2024-12-04 12:03:22 --- .../CB/492DCB0C9F5FF126BAEC1350FF65EEFD.xml | 94 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+) create mode 100644 data/49/2D/CB/492DCB0C9F5FF126BAEC1350FF65EEFD.xml diff --git a/data/49/2D/CB/492DCB0C9F5FF126BAEC1350FF65EEFD.xml b/data/49/2D/CB/492DCB0C9F5FF126BAEC1350FF65EEFD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..91785d31e2b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/49/2D/CB/492DCB0C9F5FF126BAEC1350FF65EEFD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +A second species of Protistolophus Short from Peru (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae: Hydrophilinae) + + + +Author + +Vorst, Oscar +0000-0003-3508-8551 +Naturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. +oscar.vorst@naturalis.nl + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-11-11 + + +5537 + + +3 + + +445 +450 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5537.3.11 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5537.3.11 +1175-5326 +14239843 +8E063268-213C-4CBF-BB85-23A19973F3EB + + + + + + +Redefinition of + +Protistolophus + + + + + + + +The discovery of a second species of + +Protistolophus + +obviously extends the original definition of the genus, as it was based on a single species, + +P. spangleri + +. Since the new species is quite close to the genotype, I refrain from a full, extensive redescription. However, some more important deviations from the characters proposed in the original generic description are worth noting. The absence of an apical emargination of the fifth visible ventrite while present in + +P. spangleri + +is the most noteworthy, as the absence in the remaining +Hydrophilini +thus no longer can be considered a homoplasious synapomorphy separating them from + +Protistolophus +( +Short 2010 +) + +. The dorsal punctation is in general less extensive. On the labrum the transverse row of punctures is incomplete, broadly interrupted, not complete as in + +P. spangleri + +; the pronotum with both anterior and posterior arcs only with a few (<10) punctures, not continuous; elytra with the four inner striae with only very few (ca. 10) punctures, not as irregular rows. Elytra with sutural striae in the posterior half, not the posterior nine-tenths as in + +P. spangleri + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file