diff --git a/data/54/68/87/54688784632A5F31FF0DFF13F4DB80B9.xml b/data/54/68/87/54688784632A5F31FF0DFF13F4DB80B9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..da148351136 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/54/68/87/54688784632A5F31FF0DFF13F4DB80B9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,532 @@ + + + +A review of Paracricotopus (Brundin, 1947), with the description of two new species and redescription of the adult males of Paracricotopus niger (Kieffer, 1913) and Paracricotopus uliginosus (Brundin, 1947) sensu Saether (1980) (Chironomidae: Diptera) + + + +Author + +Namayandeh, Armin +Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. + + + +Author + +Ghaderi, Edris +Department of Fisheries Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran. & Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-01-13 + + +5569 + + +1 + + +138 +158 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 +1175-5326 +14703998 +EA597E31-AF95-4D31-A14E-9455D6B335B1 + + + + + + +A key to the adult males of + +Paracricotopus +Brundin + + + + + + + + + +1. Gonostylus with conspicuous crista dorsalis................................................................ 2 + + +– Gonostylus without conspicuous crista dorsalis............................................................. 10 + + + + + +2. Crista dorsalis large, covering close to half of gonostylus ( +Chaudhuri & Som 1999 +: +Figure 4 +)... + +P. missilus +Chaudhuri & Som + + + + +– Crista dorsalis smaller, preapical, covering much less than half of gonostylus...................................... 3 + + + + + +3. Anal point apically rounded ( + +Sasa +et al +. 1988 + +: Figure 11A9)..................... + +P. oyabeangulatus +Sasa, Kwai & Ueno + + + + +– Anal point apically not rounded.......................................................................... 4 + + + + +4. AR <0.5............................................................................................ 5 + + +– AR ≥ 0.5............................................................................................ 6 + + + + + +5. Anal point short, around 25 μm long ( +Niitsuma 1990 +: +Figure 2 +; +Sasa & Okazawa 1992 +: Figure 9e); squama with 2–6 setae...................................................................................... + +P. tamabrevis +(Sasa) + + + + + +– Anal point long, around 40 μm long ( +Niitsuma 1990 +: Figure 13); squama with 8–16 setae........... + +P. irregularis +Niitsuma + + + + + + +6. Preapical crista dorsalis large............................................................................ 7 + + +– Preapical crista dorsalis small........................................................................... 9 + + + + + +7. Halteres brown ( +Fig. 4B +). Costa extension short, 41–54 μm ( +Fig. 4C +). Anal point 32–55 μm long......... + +P. niger +(Kieffer) + + + + + +– Halteres whitish ( +Fig. 5C +). Costa extension long, 82–97 μm ( +Fig. 5D +). Anal point 19–26 μm long.... + +P. uliginosus +(Brundin) + + + + + + + +9. AR 0.7; anal point around 31 μm long, with up to 9 lateral setae ( +Saether 1980b +: +Figure 1F +); squama with 7 setae................................................................................................. + +P. glaber +Saether + + + + + +– AR 0.62–0.63; anal point around 26 μm, with 2–3 lateral setae ( +Caldwell 1985 +: +Figure1 +); squama with 3 setae............................................................................................ + +P. millrockensis +Caldwell + + + + + + +10. Anal point bare; inferior volsella small to reduced.......................................................... 11 + + +– Anal point with lateral setae; inferior volsella large and well-developed......................................... 12 + + + + + +11. Anal point long; squama with 1 seta; inferior volsella a small digitiform lobe; gonostylus long and narrow bearing very small crista dorsalis ( +Bhattacharyay & Chaudhuri 1988 +: +Figure 1e +)................... + +P. insulatus +(Bhattacharyay & Chaudhuri) + + + + + +– +Anal point extremely short; squama with 3–4 setae; inferior volsella well-reduced; gonostylus short and expanded medially, without crista dorsalis ( +Steiner 1983 +: +Figure 2 +)................................................. + +P. mozleyi +Steiner + + + + + + + +12. Crista dorsalis absent ( +Sasa & Okazawa 1992 +: Figure +10g +).......................... + +P. togakuroasi +(Sasa & Okazawa) + + + + +– Crista dorsalis present................................................................................. 13 + + + + + +13. AR 0.28–0.37; anal point with 2–4 lateral setae ( + +Hazra +et al +. 2002 + +: +Figure 4 +); wing length +0.9–1.12 mm +.......................................................................................... + +P. spinicornis +Hazra & Chaudhuri + + + + + +– AR 0.9–1.0; anal point with up to 6 lateral setae ( + +Ghaderi +et al. +2023 + +: +Fig.1d +); wing length +1.3–1.5 mm +.................................................................................................. + +P. davoodi +Ghaderi +et al +. + + + + + + + +A preliminary alternative key to the adult males of + +Paracricotopus +Brundin + + + + + + + +1. Tergites II– +V +with 2 lateral setae......................................................................... 2 + + + + +– Tergites II– +V +with 3 or more lateral setae.................................................................. 5 + + + + + + +2. Anterior basal and posterior marginal setae of tergite I arranged in 2 diagonal rows ( +Figs. 7 +J-K)....................... 3 + + + + +– Anterior basal and posterior marginal setae of tergite I arranged in 3 diagonal rows ( +Figs. 7A & 7F +).................... 4 + + + + + + +3. Tergite I with anterior basal and posterior marginal setae in 3/4 format. Tergites II– +V +with numerous anterior basal and posterior marginal setae ( +Fig. 7J +)................................................................. + +P. torbjorni + + +sp. nov. + + + + + +– Tergite I with anterior basal and posterior marginal setae in 1/3 format. Tergites II– +V +with few anterior basal and posterior marginal setae ( +Fig. 7K +)............................................................... + +P. uliginosus +(Brundin) + + + + + + + +4. Tergite I with anterior basal and posterior marginal setae in 2/2/1 format. Tergites II– +V +with few anterior basal and posterior marginal setae ( +Fig. 7A +)............................................................. + +P. davoodi +Ghaderi +et al +. + + + + + +– Tergite I with anterior basal and posterior marginal setae in 3/1/3 format. Tergites II– +V +with numerous anterior basal and posterior marginal setae ( +Fig. 7F +)............................................... + +P. spinicornis +Hazra & Chaudhuri + + + + + + +5. Tergite II with 3 lateral setae............................................................................ 6 + + +– Tergite II with 4 or more lateral setae...................................................................... 8 + + + + + +6. Tergite I with anterior basal and posterior marginal setae in 3/3/1 format. Tergites +III +– +V +with 3 lateral setae ( +Fig. 7H +)........................................................................................... + +P. tamabrevis +(Sasa) + + + + + +– Tergite I with anterior basal and posterior marginal setae in 2/1/2 format. Tergites +III +– +V +with 3 lateral setae ( +Fig. 7I +)................................................................................. + +P. togakuroasi +(Sasa & Okazawa) + + + + + + + +7. Tergite I with 2 lateral setae; anterior basal and posterior marginal setae in 2/1 format ( +Fig. 7D +).......... + +P. mozleyi +Steiner + + + + + +– Tergite I with 3 lateral setae; anterior basal and posterior marginal setae in 3/2/4 format ( +Fig. 7E +)......... + +P. niger +(Kieffer) + + + + + + + +8. Tergites II– +V +with five or more lateral setae ( +Fig. 7C +)........................ + +P. insulatus +(Bhattacharyay & Chaudhuri) + + + + + +– Tergites II– +V +with 4 lateral setae......................................................................... 9 + + + + + + +9. Tergite I with anterior basal and posterior marginal setae in 1/1/3/1 format. Posterior marginal setae of tergites II– +V +slightly diagonal ( +Fig. 7B +)......................................................................... + +P. glaber +Saether + + + + + +– Tergite I with anterior basal and posterior marginal setae in 2/1/1/3 format. Posterior marginal setae of tergites II– +V +straight ( +Fig. 7G +)............................................................................... + +P. sturae + + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/54/68/87/5468878463355F30FF0DF98BF089827C.xml b/data/54/68/87/5468878463355F30FF0DF98BF089827C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9597f05e0bf --- /dev/null +++ b/data/54/68/87/5468878463355F30FF0DF98BF089827C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,622 @@ + + + +A review of Paracricotopus (Brundin, 1947), with the description of two new species and redescription of the adult males of Paracricotopus niger (Kieffer, 1913) and Paracricotopus uliginosus (Brundin, 1947) sensu Saether (1980) (Chironomidae: Diptera) + + + +Author + +Namayandeh, Armin +Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. + + + +Author + +Ghaderi, Edris +Department of Fisheries Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran. & Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2025 + +2025-01-13 + + +5569 + + +1 + + +138 +158 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 +1175-5326 +14703998 +EA597E31-AF95-4D31-A14E-9455D6B335B1 + + + + + + + +Paracricotopus togakuroasi +( +Sasa & Okazawa, 1992 +) + + + + + + + +Description. +The adult male as described by +Sasa & Okazawa (1992) +with the following additions: + + +Abdominal tergite setation +( +Fig. 7I +). Tergite I with 2 lateral setae, anterior basal setae, and posterior marginal setae arranged in 3 diagonal rows in 2/1/2 format. Tergites II with 3 lateral setae, anterior basal setae, and posterior marginal setae in two continuous diagonal rows. Tergite III-VIII with 4 lateral setae, anterior basal setae, and posterior marginal setae in two continuous diagonal rows. + + + + +Distribution. +Palearctic: +Japan +. + + + + +Remarks + + +The adult males of + +P. sturae + + +sp. nov. + +and + +P. torbjorni + + +sp. nov. + +are both similar to + +P. niger + +. A combination of shorter anal points, numbers, and patterns of the tergite setation separates adult males of both species from + +P. niger + +. + +P. torbjorni + + +sp. nov. + +adult male has a much smaller anal point than + +P. sturae + + +sp. nov. + +and + +P.niger + +, which can further separate it from the latter two species. The single + +P. torbjorni + + +sp. nov. + +adult male we examined lacked lateral setae on its anal point, similar to + +P. mozleyi + +a + +nd +P. insulatus +. +P. insulatus + +has a much longer anal point and costa extension compared to + +P. torbjorni + + +sp. nov. + +, and + +P. mozleyi + +has a gonostylus without crista dorsalis; whereas gonostylus of + +P. torbjorni + + +sp. nov. + +has a prominent crista dorsalis. +Table 7 +provides additional characteristics that can separate adult males of + +Paracricotopus + +. A combination of longer notum, smaller seminal capsule, and pattern of tergites setae separates the female of + +P. sturae + + +sp. nov. + +from that of + +P. niger + +. +Table 8 +provides additional characteristics that can separate known adult females of + +Paracricotopus + +. + + + +TABLE 7. +Adult male of + +Paracricotopus +Brundin spp. + +, comparison of some relevant characters. Ac = Acrostichals; AnP = Anal point; AR = Antennal Ratio; Dc = Dorsocentrals; ext. = extension; H = Head; Hal = Haltere; L = Length; LS = Lateral Setae; Sq = Squama; TL = Total Length; WL = Wing Lenght. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Species + +TL (mm) + +WL (mm) + +HL + +Hal Color + +AR + +Ac + +Dc + +Sq + +Costa ext. L + +AnP L (μm) + +AnP LS +
+ +P. davoodi + +2.1–2.41.3–1.5204Whitish0.9–1.0129–1242222–266
+ +P. glaber + +2.71.6281Brown0.70–0.9581175423–319
+ +P. insulatus + +2.8–3.01.6–1.790Light brown1913–141~ 66330
+ +P. irregularis + +1.7–2.31.3–1.6─Dark brown0.24–0.304–77–108–16─40–4411–17
+ +P. millrockensis + +1.80.97─Basally brown, apically light brown0.62–0.6356–93─17–262–3
+ +P. missilus + +2.8–2.851.5─Basally blackish, apically light brown0.275–681448–6836–402–3
+ +P. mozleyi + +3.2──Dark brown0.8496–93–4─8–110
+ +P. niger + +1.8–2.41.0–1.5255–256Dark brown0.51–0.732–98–106–1241–5432–556–8
+ +P. oyabeangulatus + +1.91.1──0.381085~ 86──
+ +P. spinicornis + +1.6–2.30.9–1.1─Basally blackish, apically light brown0.28–0.377–158–124–6~ 3029–332–3
+ + +P. sturae + +sp. nov. + +2.1–2.41.3–1.04242Brown1.5127861–6621–294–6
+ +P. tamabrevis + +1.4–1.61.0–1.3─Dark brown0.31–0.376–98–102–6~7521–258–10
+ +P. togakuroasi + +2.61.6──0.711084–5~ 50422
+ + +P. torbjorni + +sp. nov. + +2.11.3259Brown──7640130
+ +P. uliginosus + +2.0–2.31.3–1.4224–240Whitish0.46–0.5612– 1483–582–9719–266
+ + +The examined +type +specimens of + +P. sturae + + +sp. nov. + +and + +P. torbjorni + + +sp. nov. + +lacked antenna, and therefore, for now, we did not include them in the adult male key. However, they are included in the preliminary alternative key based on adult males’ tergite setation, further separating them from other known species of + +Paracricotopus + +. Historically, the generic diagnosis of + +Paracricotopus + +only mentioned the abdominal tergites and sternites in having distinct rows of anterior and posterior setae (Thieneman & Harnisch 1931; Cranston e +t al. +1989). Some previous workers have provided the total number of setae on tergites ( +Caldwell 1985 +; Chaudhuri & Som 1998; + +Hazra +et al +. 2002 + +; Nitsuma 1990; +Saether 1980b +). However, the pattern of these setae was never investigated. Based on the +type +and voucher specimens we have examined and the review of the literature, we found that each + +Paracricotopus +species + +has a unique tergite setae pattern, which can be further used as a distinguishing characteristic for adults ( +Fig. 7 +). We designated the most lateral anterior basal and posterior marginal setae as lateral setae, which we found their numbers is a distinguishing characteristic. Further, we found that the anterior basal and posterior marginal setae of tergite I are diagonally parallel and have a unique pattern format that is species-specific. Also, the setation pattern of tergites I to V is much more distinguishing, and as such, we mainly emphasized these tergites. Based on these characteristics, we provided additional descriptions for most + +Paracricotopus +species + +and an alternative key to the adult male of the genus. Since we only examined a few specimens from each species, in addition to what little was available in the literature, and could not examine the +type +specimens of + +Paracricotopus irregularis +Nitsuma, 1990 + +, + +Paracricotopus millrockensis +Caldwell, 1985 + +, + +Paracricotopus missilus +Chaudhuri & Som, 1998 + +, and + +Paracricotopus oyabeangulatus +Sasa, Kwai & Ueno, 1988 + +, our tergite setae key at best can be a preliminary one, until more +type +and voucher adult specimens from various locations are examined. Combining the +two adult +male keys to produce a more comprehensive key would have made sense. For now, two reasons prevented us from doing so. First, the alternative key signifies the importance of tergite setation as a distinguishing characteristic. Further, the absence of antenna and, therefore, its characteristics in + +P. sturae + + +sp. nov. + +and + +P. torbjorni + + +sp. nov. + +, along with the absence of the species above, could not provide us with proper options of tergite setae character to separate the + +Paracricotopus +species. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/54/68/87/5468878463395F24FF0DFC68F3FE8019.xml b/data/54/68/87/5468878463395F24FF0DFC68F3FE8019.xml index 517a6e613fc..755efad4024 100644 --- a/data/54/68/87/5468878463395F24FF0DFC68F3FE8019.xml +++ b/data/54/68/87/5468878463395F24FF0DFC68F3FE8019.xml @@ -1,52 +1,52 @@ - - - -A review of Paracricotopus (Brundin, 1947), with the description of two new species and redescription of the adult males of Paracricotopus niger (Kieffer, 1913) and Paracricotopus uliginosus (Brundin, 1947) sensu Saether (1980) (Chironomidae: Diptera) + + + +A review of Paracricotopus (Brundin, 1947), with the description of two new species and redescription of the adult males of Paracricotopus niger (Kieffer, 1913) and Paracricotopus uliginosus (Brundin, 1947) sensu Saether (1980) (Chironomidae: Diptera) - - -Author + + +Author -Namayandeh, Armin -Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. +Namayandeh, Armin +Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. - - -Author + + +Author -Ghaderi, Edris -Department of Fisheries Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran. & Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. +Ghaderi, Edris +Department of Fisheries Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran. & Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2025 - -2025-01-13 + +2025 + +2025-01-13 - -5569 + +5569 - -1 + +1 - -138 -158 + +138 +158 - -https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 -1175-5326 -14703998 -EA597E31-AF95-4D31-A14E-9455D6B335B1 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 +1175-5326 +14703998 +EA597E31-AF95-4D31-A14E-9455D6B335B1 @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: Type material. - + Holotype : 1 Male @@ -110,9 +110,7 @@ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: BOLD ID: BIOUG16260 -- -E10. 1 -; dep. +-E10. 1; dep. NTNU . @@ -152,11 +150,8 @@ ID: ID: BIOUG16480 -- - -E12. +-E12. 1 - Female same as @@ -255,10 +250,10 @@ magnification. . Hind and mid femurs with keel. Pulvilli developed. Foreleg and hid tarsal 5 th segment missing, mid tibia spurs 16–17, 17 and 13 μm long, hind tibia spurs 34–35 and 16–18, 17 μm long, hind tibia comb with around 10–12 spines. Lengths and proportions of legs as in -Table 1 +Table 1 . - + TABLE 1. Lengths (in μm) and proportions of leg segments of @@ -414,10 +409,10 @@ magnification. Legs . Foreleg and hind tarsus missing. Hind and mid femurs with keel. Pulvilli developed. Mid tibia spurs 17 and 14 μm long, hind tibia spurs 32 and 14 μm long, hind tibia comb with around 8 spines. Lengths and proportions of legs as in -Table 2 +Table 2 . - + TABLE 2. Lengths (in μm) and proportions of leg segments of diff --git a/data/54/68/87/54688784633C5F29FF0DFCE5F3368448.xml b/data/54/68/87/54688784633C5F29FF0DFCE5F3368448.xml index 0d9d38bd9bf..68364d8d8de 100644 --- a/data/54/68/87/54688784633C5F29FF0DFCE5F3368448.xml +++ b/data/54/68/87/54688784633C5F29FF0DFCE5F3368448.xml @@ -1,52 +1,52 @@ - - - -A review of Paracricotopus (Brundin, 1947), with the description of two new species and redescription of the adult males of Paracricotopus niger (Kieffer, 1913) and Paracricotopus uliginosus (Brundin, 1947) sensu Saether (1980) (Chironomidae: Diptera) + + + +A review of Paracricotopus (Brundin, 1947), with the description of two new species and redescription of the adult males of Paracricotopus niger (Kieffer, 1913) and Paracricotopus uliginosus (Brundin, 1947) sensu Saether (1980) (Chironomidae: Diptera) - - -Author + + +Author -Namayandeh, Armin -Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. +Namayandeh, Armin +Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. - - -Author + + +Author -Ghaderi, Edris -Department of Fisheries Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran. & Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. +Ghaderi, Edris +Department of Fisheries Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran. & Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2025 - -2025-01-13 + +2025 + +2025-01-13 - -5569 + +5569 - -1 + +1 - -138 -158 + +138 +158 - -https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 -1175-5326 -14703998 -EA597E31-AF95-4D31-A14E-9455D6B335B1 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 +1175-5326 +14703998 +EA597E31-AF95-4D31-A14E-9455D6B335B1 @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ Material examined. - + 1 Male ; Norway @@ -85,13 +85,11 @@ ; 61.74614˚N, 10.74618˚E; -30.vi- 07.vii.2008 +30.vi-07.vii.2008 ; leg. T - . - Hoffstad ; det. E. Stur @@ -101,7 +99,7 @@ NTNU . - + 1 Male ; Norway @@ -123,9 +121,7 @@ E.Stur & T - . - Ekrem ; det. E. Stur @@ -133,15 +129,13 @@ NTNU-VM 182621 ; BOLD - - ID: BIOUG16478 - -D12; dep. NTNU -. - +. + + 1 Female ; Norway @@ -163,9 +157,7 @@ ID: E.Stur & T - . - Ekrem ; det. E. Stur @@ -173,14 +165,12 @@ ID: NTNU-VM 182620 ; BOLD - - ID: BIOUG15947 - -C12; dep. NTNU . + Diagnostic characters. @@ -235,7 +225,7 @@ segment, AR 0.67. Eyes hairy, without dorsomedial extension, temporal setae 4, i 7 in single row. Antepronotal lobes developed, with small gap and bearing 5 setae. - + TABLE 4. Lengths (in μm) and proportions of leg segments of @@ -356,7 +346,7 @@ magnification. Legs . Hind and mid femurs with keel. Pulvilli developed. Fore tibia spur 37–41, 39 μm long, mid tibia spurs 16–17 and 15–17 μm long, hind tibia spurs 36–38, 37 and 19 μm long, hind tibia comb with 12 spines. Lengths and proportions of legs as in -Table 4 +Table 4 . diff --git a/data/54/68/87/54688784633E5F27FF0DFA94F384847E.xml b/data/54/68/87/54688784633E5F27FF0DFA94F384847E.xml index 567af722ff5..e4446d03a41 100644 --- a/data/54/68/87/54688784633E5F27FF0DFA94F384847E.xml +++ b/data/54/68/87/54688784633E5F27FF0DFA94F384847E.xml @@ -1,52 +1,52 @@ - - - -A review of Paracricotopus (Brundin, 1947), with the description of two new species and redescription of the adult males of Paracricotopus niger (Kieffer, 1913) and Paracricotopus uliginosus (Brundin, 1947) sensu Saether (1980) (Chironomidae: Diptera) + + + +A review of Paracricotopus (Brundin, 1947), with the description of two new species and redescription of the adult males of Paracricotopus niger (Kieffer, 1913) and Paracricotopus uliginosus (Brundin, 1947) sensu Saether (1980) (Chironomidae: Diptera) - - -Author + + +Author -Namayandeh, Armin -Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. +Namayandeh, Armin +Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. - - -Author + + +Author -Ghaderi, Edris -Department of Fisheries Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran. & Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. +Ghaderi, Edris +Department of Fisheries Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran. & Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2025 - -2025-01-13 + +2025 + +2025-01-13 - -5569 + +5569 - -1 + +1 - -138 -158 + +138 +158 - -https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 + +https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 -1175-5326 -14703998 -EA597E31-AF95-4D31-A14E-9455D6B335B1 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5569.1.5 +1175-5326 +14703998 +EA597E31-AF95-4D31-A14E-9455D6B335B1 @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: Type material. - + Holotype : Male @@ -187,10 +187,10 @@ magnification. Legs . Hind and mid femurs with keel. Pulvilli developed. Fore tibia spur 25 μm long, mid tibia spurs 15 and 14 μm long, hind tibia spurs 28 and 16 μm long; hind tibia comb with around 10 spines. Lengths and proportions of legs as in -Table 3 +Table 3 . - + TABLE 3. Lengths (in μm) and proportions of leg segments of