diff --git a/data/35/CD/A2/35CDA2584BDF5A3BA82C084086F4E380.xml b/data/35/CD/A2/35CDA2584BDF5A3BA82C084086F4E380.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a923d751fca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/35/CD/A2/35CDA2584BDF5A3BA82C084086F4E380.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+
+
+
+Afrotropical Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with description of four new species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Liu, Zhen
+0000-0002-8670-0205
+Changde Key Innovation Team for Wetland Biology and Environmental Ecology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde 415000, China & Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Polaszek, Andrew
+0000-0002-7171-3353
+Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-10-22
+
+
+1216
+
+
+83
+100
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1216.133127
+04C335D9-5252-499F-A004-7C9C2220C88C
+
+
+
+
+
+Centistidea linearis
+Liu & Polaszek
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 3
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length
+2.6 mm
+, dark brown; head 1.7 × as wide as long, 1.5 × wider than mesoscutum; eyes 2.0 × longer than temple in dorsal view; temple slightly shiny, small setose punctures with transverse wrinkles in between, not constricted behind eyes in dorsal view; distance between fore and a hind ocellus 1.5 × longer than minor axis of a hind ocellus,
+POL
+:
+OD
+:
+OOL
+= 1.3: 1.0: 3.1; clypeus 1.6 × wider than medial length, weakly defined punctate; antenna 1.2 × longer than body length, with 1
+st
+, 2
+nd
+, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 5.2, 4.9, 4.1 and 4.3 × longer than wide, 1
+st
+about as long as 2
+nd
+; mesoscutum with superficial and extremely small punctures, intervals with extremely fine wrinkles, notauli obvious, crenulated near to anterior 1 / 2; scutellar sulcus slightly curved, indistinctly crenulated; medio-posterior depressions of scutellum large and oblong, interval 3 / 4 of depression diameter; propodeum with distinct median carinae reaching beyond weak defined costulae, anterior parts with indistinct punctures anteriorly except wrinkles elsewhere as posterior parts, anterior part 2.8 × longer than median length of metanotum; vein 1 -
+R
+1 0.3 of length of pterostigma;
+T
+1 2.8 × longer than its maximum width;
+T
+2 2.6 × wider than median length;
+T
+3 1.7 × longer than
+T
+2.
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Female.
+Body length
+2.6 mm
+, fore wing length
+2.6 mm
+(Fig.
+3 a
+).
+
+
+
+
+Head
+.
+
+Transverse in dorsal view, 1.7 × as wide as long, 1.5 × wider than mesoscutum. Eyes 2.0 × longer than temple in dorsal view (Fig.
+3 b
+). Temple a little shiny, with small setose punctures and with transverse wrinkles in between, not constricted behind eyes in dorsal view. Ocelli small, distance between fore and a hind ocellus 1.5 × longer than minor axis of a hind ocellus,
+POL
+:
+OD
+:
+OOL
+= 1.3: 1.0: 3.1. Frons flat and nearly polished except extremely fine transverse wrinkles. Vertex between eye and hind ocellus shiny and sculptured as temple. Face (Fig.
+3 c
+) shiny, with fine setose punctures, indistinctly convex medially, transverse, 1.3 × wider than high. Clypeus 1.6 × wider than medial length, weakly defined punctate. Length of malar space as long as basal width of mandible. Antenna (Fig.
+3 d
+) 1.2 × longer than body length, with scape, pedicel and 1
+st
+, 2
+nd
+, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 2.0, 1.7, 5.2, 4.9, 4.1 and 4.3 × longer than wide, 1
+st
+about as long as 2
+nd
+, flagellomeres gradually shortened to apex.
+
+
+
+Mesosoma
+.
+
+Length: width: height = 10: 4.2: 6.3. Mesoscutum (Fig.
+3 e
+) shiny with superficial and extremely small punctures, intervals with extremely fine wrinkles, notauli distinct, crenulated near to anterior 1 / 2. Scutellar sulcus slightly curved, indistinctly crenulated. Scutellum strongly shiny, sculptured as mesoscutum, medio-posterior depressions large and oblong, widely separated, interval 3 / 4 of depression diameter). Propodeum (Fig.
+3 i
+) shiny, with distinct median carinae reaching beyond weakly defined costulae, anterior parts with indistinct punctures anteriorly except wrinkles elsewhere as posterior parts, anterior part 2.8 × longer than median length of metanotum. Mesopleuron (Fig.
+3 f
+) highly polished, impunctate.
+
+
+
+Legs
+.
+
+Hind femur (Fig.
+3 k
+) 3.3 × as long as its widest part. Length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 1.5: 1.9: 1.0. Basitarsus of hind leg 0.9 × as long as tarsomeres 2–5.
+
+
+
+Wings
+.
+
+Fore wing (Fig.
+
+3 g
+
+): pterostigma, 2.6 × as long as its widest part; vein 1 -
+R
+1 0.3 length of pterostigma; vein r: 2 - SR: 2 - M = 1.0: 5.5: 2.3, 1 - SR: 1 - M = 1.0: 4.1, 1 - CU 1: 2 - CU 1 = 1.0: 1.7; first discal cell of fore wing nearly 1.2 × wider than high. Hind wing (Fig.
+3 h
+): vein M + CU: 1 - M: r-m = 2.0: 2.2: 1.0.
+
+
+
+Metasoma
+.
+
+Indistinctly longer than mesosoma.
+T
+1 (Fig.
+3 l
+) highly polished, spatula-shaped, 2.8 × longer than its maximum width, distinctly narrowed anterior-medially.
+T
+2 transverse, 2.6 × wider than median length.
+T
+3 1.7 × longer than
+T
+2, weakly longitudinally striate. Hypopygium shorter than length of metasoma. Ovipositor sheath (Fig.
+3 j
+) 0.8 length of hind basitarsus, with long and dense setae apically.
+
+
+
+Colour
+.
+
+Dark brown, except metasoma more or less brown dorsally (Fig.
+3 a
+). Palpi and spurs pale yellow. Antenna and apical ovipositor sheath dark brown. Legs yellow to yellow-brown on all tarsi and hind tibia. Wing membrane hyaline, pterostigma brown, vein r, 2 - SR, 1 - SR, 1 - M and 1 - CU 1 darker brown, other veins brown.
+
+
+Male.
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+
+Host.
+
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+Material examined
+
+
+
+(
+
+
+NHMUK
+
+).
+
+Holotype
+
+: •
+1 ♀
+,
+Cameroon
+,
+Nkoémvon, D
+. Jackson,
+
+VII – VIII. 1979
+
+, No.
+NHMUK 010639762
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Cameroon
+.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The specific name
+
+“
+linearis
+
+” derives from the Latin, referring to the fine wrinkles on head and mesosoma.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+
+
+This species is similar to
+
+C. africana
+
+but differs in the following: antenna 1.3 × longer than body (antenna shorter than body in
+
+C. africana
+
+); medio-posterior depressions on scutellum oblong, far away from each other, interval 3 / 4 of depression diameter (oval and close to each other in
+
+C. africana
+
+); and scutellar sulcus indistinctly crenulated (not crenulated or concave in
+
+C. africana
+
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/46/EE/B3/46EEB38D71995106A1D02B31D7CB0DD1.xml b/data/46/EE/B3/46EEB38D71995106A1D02B31D7CB0DD1.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..769f873070c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/46/EE/B3/46EEB38D71995106A1D02B31D7CB0DD1.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,906 @@
+
+
+
+Afrotropical Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with description of four new species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Liu, Zhen
+0000-0002-8670-0205
+Changde Key Innovation Team for Wetland Biology and Environmental Ecology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde 415000, China & Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Polaszek, Andrew
+0000-0002-7171-3353
+Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-10-22
+
+
+1216
+
+
+83
+100
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1216.133127
+04C335D9-5252-499F-A004-7C9C2220C88C
+
+
+
+
+
+Centistidea turneri
+Liu & Polaszek
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 6
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length
+1.7 mm
+, light red-brown; eyes 1.8 × longer than temple in dorsal view; temple smooth, superficially punctate, a little constricted behind eyes in dorsal view; hind ocelli in a shallow depression, distance between fore and a hind ocellus 1.3 × longer than minor axis of a hind ocellus,
+POL
+:
+OD
+:
+OOL
+= 1.5: 1.0: 2.5; vertex between eye and hind ocellus shiny and polished; face polished, 1.4 × wider than high; antenna slightly shorter than body length, with penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 2.2 and 2.5 × longer than wide, 1
+st
+slightly longer (1.1 ×) than 2
+nd
+; mesoscutum with superficial and fine dense punctures anteriorly and laterally, more shallow and sparser dorsally, notauli hardly visible, only slightly depressed at anterior extremity; scutellar sulcus slightly curved, shallowly concave without crenulation; medio-posterior depressions of scutellum oblong, touching each other; propodeum with median carina reaching half way to hind margin, and bifurcated to two-thirds of lateral margin, largely polished elsewhere; pterostigma 2.8 × as long as its widest part, vein 1 -
+R
+1 virtually absent;
+T
+1 polished, 2.5 × longer than its maximum width, strongly narrowed anterior-medially;
+T
+2 1.9 × wider than median length, not longitudinally striate at lateral membranous area;
+T
+3 1.4 × longer than
+T
+2, weakly longitudinally striate.
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Female.
+Body length
+1.7 mm
+, fore wing length
+1.8 mm
+(Fig.
+6 a
+).
+
+
+
+
+Head
+.
+
+Transverse in dorsal view, 1.8 × as wide as long, 1.3 × wider than mesoscutum. Eyes 1.8 × longer than temple in dorsal view (Fig.
+6 b
+). Temple slightly shiny, smooth, indistinctly punctate, sparsely pubescent, a little constricted behind eyes in dorsal view (Fig.
+6 c
+). Ocelli small, hind ocelli in a shallow depression, distance between fore and a hind ocellus 1.3 × longer than minor axis of a hind ocellus,
+POL
+:
+OD
+:
+OOL
+= 1.5: 1.0: 2.5. Frons flat and polished. Vertex between eye and hind ocellus shiny and polished. Face (Fig.
+6 c
+) indistinctly convex medially, transverse, 1.4 × wider than high. Clypeus 2.0 × wider than medial length, slightly polished. Length of malar space 1.5 × longer than width of mandible. Antenna (Fig.
+6 d
+) slightly shorter than body length, with scape, pedicel and 1
+st
+, 2
+nd
+, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 2.0, 1.6, 4.5, 4.5, 2.2, and 2.5 × longer than wide, 1
+st
+slightly longer (1.1 ×) than 2
+nd
+, flagellomeres gradually shortened to penultimate flagellomeres.
+
+
+
+Mesosoma
+.
+
+Length: width: height = 1.8: 1.0: 1.3. Mesoscutum (Fig.
+6 e
+) shiny with superficial and fine dense punctures anteriorly and laterally, more shallow and sparser dorsally, notauli hardly visible dorsally, only slightly depressed at anterior extremity. Scutellar sulcus slightly curved, shallowly concave with crenulation. Scutellum shiny, sculptured as dorsal mesoscutum, medio-posterior depressions oblong, touching each other. Propodeum (Fig.
+6 h
+) shiny, with median carina reaching halfway to hind margin, and bifurcated to two thirds of lateral margin, largely polished elsewhere. Mesopleuron highly polished, impunctate.
+
+
+
+Legs
+.
+
+Hind femur (Fig.
+6 i
+) 3.3 × as long as its widest part. Length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 1.9: 2.9: 1.0. Basitarsus of hind leg 0.7 × as long as tarsomeres 2–5.
+
+
+
+Wings
+.
+
+Fore wing (Fig.
+
+6 g
+
+): pterostigma 2.8 × as long as its widest part; vein 1 -
+R
+1 virtually absent; vein r: 2 - SR: 2 - M = 1.0: 6.7: 3.0, 1 - SR: 1 - M = 1.0: 4.4, 1 - CU 1: 2 - CU 1 = 1.0: 1.6; first discal cell of fore wing indistinctly wider than high. Hind wing (Fig.
+
+6 g
+
+): vein M + CU: 1 - M: r-m = 2.0: 2.5: 1.0.
+
+
+
+Metasoma
+.
+
+Nearly as long as mesosoma.
+T
+1 (Fig.
+6 k
+) polished, spatula-shaped, 2.5 × longer than its maximum width, strongly narrowed antero-medially, transversely striate at lateral membranous area.
+T
+2 1.9 × wider than median length, not longitudinally striate at lateral membranous area.
+T
+3 1.4 × longer than
+T
+2, weakly longitudinally striate. Hypopygium not shorter than length of metasoma. Ovipositor sheath (Fig.
+6 j
+) 1.3 × longer than hind basitarsus, with long and dense setae at apical third.
+
+
+
+Colour
+.
+
+Light red-brown, terga posterior to
+T
+3 dark brown (Fig.
+6 a
+). Palpi and spurs light red-yellow. Antenna and basal half ovipositor sheath (apical half dark brow) yellow-brown. Legs yellow-brown except apical tarsomeres. Wing membrane hyaline, pterostigma pale yellow, vein 1 - SR, 1 - M and 1 - CU 1 brown, other veins pale yellow.
+
+
+
+Variation
+.
+
+Body colour varying from light yellow to dark brown on trunk of body among specimens. Specimens from Mossel Bay and Ceres from
+Cape Province
+tend to be darker when compared with the light yellow specimens from Pondoland of Port St. John in
+South Africa
+and
+Uganda
+. Body length varies from very small (
+1.2 mm
+) to large (
+2.2 mm
+).
+
+
+Male.
+Similar to female, but body smaller with darker metasoma and longer antenna.
+
+
+
+
+Host.
+
+
+Leaf-miner in castor (
+
+Ricinus communis
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+Material examined
+
+
+
+(
+
+NHMUK
+
+).
+
+Holotype
+
+
+: •
+
+1 ♀
+,
+
+SOUTH AFRICA
+
+,
+Cape Province
+,
+Swellendam
+,
+RE Turner
+,
+
+II. 1932
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1932-145,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639682
+
+.
+
+
+Paratypes
+
+: •
+1 ♀
+,
+South Africa
+,
+Cape Province
+,
+Somerset East
+,
+RE Turner
+,
+
+23–31. XII. 1930
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1931-61,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639720
+
+; •
+
+2 ♀♀
+,
+South Africa
+,
+Cape Province
+,
+Mossel Bay
+,
+RE Turner
+,
+
+IV. 1921
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1921-210,
+Nos.
+NHMUK 010639718
+,
+010639716
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+, same data except
+
+
+V
+. 1921
+
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1921-248,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639719
+
+; •
+
+6 ♀♀
+, same data except
+
+
+VI
+. 1921
+
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1921-294,
+Nos.
+NHMUK 010639717
+,
+010639706
+,
+010639700
+,
+010639710
+,
+010639701
+,
+010639686
+
+; •
+
+2 ♀♀
+, same data except
+
+5–31. VII. 1921
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1921-315,
+Nos.
+NHMUK 010639715
+,
+010639714
+
+; •
+
+7 ♀♀
+, same data except
+
+VIII. 1921
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1921-353,
+Nos.
+NHMUK 010639711
+,
+010639712
+,
+010639707
+,
+010639708
+,
+010639692
+,
+010639687
+,
+010639713
+
+; •
+
+6 ♀♀
+, same data except
+
+IX. 1921
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1921-412,
+Nos.
+NHMUK 010639705
+,
+010639703
+,
+010639695
+,
+010639693
+,
+010639697
+,
+010639699
+
+; •
+
+7 ♀♀
+1 ♂
+, same data except
+
+X. 1921
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1921-450,
+Nos.
+NHMUK 010639696
+,
+010639709
+,
+010639683
+,
+010639689
+,
+010639694
+,
+010639684
+,
+010639691
+,
+010639690
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+, same data except
+
+18–30. XI. 1921
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1922-2,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639688
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+, same data except
+
+I. 1922
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1922-67,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639704
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+, same data except
+
+II. 1922
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1922-97,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639698
+
+; •
+
+2 ♀♀
+,
+South Africa
+,
+Cape Province
+,
+Ceres
+(
+
+457 m
+
+),
+RE Turner
+,
+
+I. 1921
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1921-78,
+Nos.
+NHMUK 010639685
+,
+010639702
+
+; •
+
+2 ♀♀
+, same data except
+
+II. 1921
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1921-115,
+Nos.
+NHMUK 010639629
+010639640
+
+; •
+
+11 ♀♀
+, same data except
+
+III. 1921
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1921-150,
+Nos.
+NHMUK 010639661
+,
+010639654
+,
+010639666
+,
+010639650
+,
+010639645
+,
+010639674
+,
+010639663
+,
+010639655
+,
+010639660
+,
+010639671
+,
+010639630
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+, same data except
+
+II. 1925
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1925-116,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639633
+
+; •
+
+9 ♀♀
+, same data except
+
+III. 1925
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1925-161,
+Nos.
+NHMUK 010639644
+,
+010639638
+,
+010639659
+,
+010639636
+,
+010639635
+,
+010639651
+,
+010639658
+,
+010639668
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+, same data except
+
+IV. 1925
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1925-210,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639538
+
+; •
+
+1 ♂
+,
+South Africa
+,
+Cape Province
+,
+Katberg
+(
+
+1219 m
+
+),
+RE Turner
+,
+
+X. 1932
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1932-521,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639599
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+,
+South Africa
+,
+Port St. John
+,
+Pondoland
+,
+RE Turner
+,
+
+
+12–30.
+VI
+. 1923
+
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1923-363,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639652
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+, same data except
+
+15–31. VIII. 1923
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1923-463,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639541
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+, same data except
+
+1–13. III. 1924
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1924-177,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639617
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+1 ♂
+, same data except
+
+XII. 1923
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1924-54,
+Nos.
+NHMUK 010639542
+,
+010639549
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+, same data except
+
+I. 1924
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1924-97,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639605
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+, same data except
+
+29. I – 5. II. 1924
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1924-109,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639580
+
+; •
+
+1 ♂
+, same data except
+
+6-25. II. 1924
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1924-136,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639557
+
+; •
+
+1 ♀
+, same data except
+
+18–31. III. 1924
+
+,
+Brit. Mus
+1924-191,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639607
+
+; •
+
+8 ♀♀
+,
+
+Uganda
+
+,
+Kampala
+,
+
+
+7.
+V
+. 1934
+
+
+, ex leaf-miner in castor (
+
+Ricinus communis
+
+),
+Nos.
+NHMUK 010639764
+,
+010639759
+,
+010639742
+,
+010639729
+,
+010639749
+,
+010639758
+,
+010639755
+,
+010639733
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+South Africa
+,
+Uganda
+.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The specific name
+
+“
+turneri
+
+” expresses our gratitude to the late
+R
+. E. Turner for the large quantity of this species collected in
+South Africa
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+
+
+From a short apical extension of the pterostigma to distinctly longer and equaling the length of pterostigma, vein 1 -
+R
+1 is often present in
+
+Centistidea
+
+. In this species, however, it is absent compare to its Afrotropical allies; it is similar to
+
+C.
+mubilibana
+(
+de Saeger, 1944
+)
+
+for the carination of propodeum but differs in the following: length of the ocellar triangle nearly half of the distance which separates it from each eye (approximately equal in
+
+C. mubilibana
+
+); vein 1 - SR present (almost completely absent in
+
+C. mubilibana
+
+); and
+T
+1 polished (striate or rugose in
+
+C. mubilibana
+
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/70/25/31/70253193AB9955E5B09757F0F96E16C0.xml b/data/70/25/31/70253193AB9955E5B09757F0F96E16C0.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2927960ee8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/70/25/31/70253193AB9955E5B09757F0F96E16C0.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+
+
+
+Afrotropical Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with description of four new species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Liu, Zhen
+0000-0002-8670-0205
+Changde Key Innovation Team for Wetland Biology and Environmental Ecology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde 415000, China & Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Polaszek, Andrew
+0000-0002-7171-3353
+Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-10-22
+
+
+1216
+
+
+83
+100
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1216.133127
+04C335D9-5252-499F-A004-7C9C2220C88C
+
+
+
+
+
+Centistidea tihamica
+Ahmad & Pandey, 2019
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Centistidea tihamica
+
+Ahmad & Pandey, 2019: 43.
+Holotype
+in the
+Insect Collection
+of the
+Department of Zoology
+,
+Aligarh Muslim University
+,
+Aligarh
+,
+India
+(not examined).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length
+1.8 mm
+, mostly yellow-brown; length of eye 1.5 × temple in dorsal view; head and vertex indistinctly punctate; 1
+st
+flagellomere 1.25 × longer than 2
+nd
+; penultimate flagellomere 2.5–3.0 × as long as wide; mesoscutum shiny with few distinct punctures, notauli only anteriorly impressed; scutellar sulcus distinct, present as a narrow groove and crenulated; medio-posterior depressions of scutellum semicircular and separated (from the original image); propodeum almost smooth with a complete median longitudinal carina bifurcate posteriorly, median carina of propodeum absent behind level of costulae; pterostigma with a long slender, apical expansion, 2.2 × longer than wide; vein r very prominent and 0.2 × as long as the height of pterostigma; vein 1 - SR absent (from the original image);
+T
+1 4.0 × as long as its maximum width;
+T
+2 subtriangular, smooth, laterally membranous, and longitudinally striated;
+T
+3 longitudinally striated; ovipositor sheaths 0.15 × as long as fore wing (following
+Ghramh et al. 2019
+).
+
+
+
+
+Host.
+
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Saudi Arabia
+. Although not strictly in the Afrotropical region, the species is included here for future reference, in case it should eventually be discovered in the region.
+
+
+
+
+Note.
+
+
+No specimens were available for this study.
+Ghramh et al. (2019)
+described it as the first species of
+
+Centistidea
+
+from the Afrotropical region. However, when we examined the original descriptions and images and related specimens, all species originally described as
+
+Mirax
+
+including
+
+africana
+
+,
+
+leucopterae
+
+, and
+
+mubilibana
+
+in this area are all
+
+Centistidea
+
+by possessing medio-longitudinal carina on propodeum and more or less impressed notauli on anterior mesoscutum.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/91/B8/69/91B869EC92715B88AD8A2106785E5F5E.xml b/data/91/B8/69/91B869EC92715B88AD8A2106785E5F5E.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..101fe85de7e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/91/B8/69/91B869EC92715B88AD8A2106785E5F5E.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+
+
+
+Afrotropical Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with description of four new species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Liu, Zhen
+0000-0002-8670-0205
+Changde Key Innovation Team for Wetland Biology and Environmental Ecology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde 415000, China & Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Polaszek, Andrew
+0000-0002-7171-3353
+Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-10-22
+
+
+1216
+
+
+83
+100
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1216.133127
+04C335D9-5252-499F-A004-7C9C2220C88C
+
+
+
+
+
+Centistidea mubilibana
+(
+de Saeger, 1944
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 5
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Mirax mubilibana
+
+
+de Saeger, 1944: 34
+.
+Holotype
+in
+
+RMCA
+
+, examined.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Mirax mubilibana
+
+
+:
+
+Shenefelt 1973: 678
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length
+2–3 mm
+, colour variable, mostly black; face, vertex and occiput very finely punctate, shiny; temple smooth; eyes a third longer than wide; length of the ocellar triangle approximately equal to the distance which separates it from each eye; antenna nearly as long as body, 1
+st
+flagellomere a little longer and thinner than the following; mesoscutum regularly and finely punctate, more densely than the face, more sparsely laterally and disc of the scutellum, notauli present anteriorly; scutellar sulcus weakly arched, narrow and foveated; medio-posterior depressions of scutellum very small, round; propodeum rough, with carinae arranged as in
+
+M. leucopterae
+
+, but median carinae more wide, more or less divided, the apical area comprises approximately a third the length of propodeum; vein r almost completely absent;
+T
+1 2.5 × longer than its greatest width, striate or rugose;
+T
+2 smooth and shiny, with a small tubercle basal medially;
+T
+2 and
+T
+3 of the same length;
+T
+3 with slightly stronger longitudinal aciculation than
+T
+2; ovipositor sheath a little shorter than metatarsus III.
+
+
+
+
+
+Host.
+
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+Material examined
+
+
+
+(
+
+
+RMCA
+
+).
+
+Holotype
+
+: •
+1 ♀
+,
+Congo Belge
+: PNA
+Mubiliba
+(Vol. Nyamuragira),
+
+2000 m
+
+,
+
+14–26. VI. 1935
+
+,
+G. F. de Witte
+: 1499,
+Coll. Mus.
+Congo
+(ex coll. I. P. N. C. B).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Democratic Republic of Congo
+,
+Rwanda
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/9E/3D/60/9E3D603900B959DF8BA411E98CEDC650.xml b/data/9E/3D/60/9E3D603900B959DF8BA411E98CEDC650.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6b55406cbee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/9E/3D/60/9E3D603900B959DF8BA411E98CEDC650.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+
+
+
+Afrotropical Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with description of four new species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Liu, Zhen
+0000-0002-8670-0205
+Changde Key Innovation Team for Wetland Biology and Environmental Ecology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde 415000, China & Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Polaszek, Andrew
+0000-0002-7171-3353
+Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-10-22
+
+
+1216
+
+
+83
+100
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1216.133127
+04C335D9-5252-499F-A004-7C9C2220C88C
+
+
+
+
+
+Centistidea africana
+(
+Brues, 1926
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Mirax africana
+
+
+Brues, 1926: 292
+.
+Holotype
+in
+Durban Museum
+and
+Art Gallery
+,
+Durban
+,
+South Africa
+(not examined).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Mirax africana
+
+
+:
+
+De Saeger 1944: 37
+
+;
+
+Shenefelt 1973: 676
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length
+1.7 mm
+, yellow-brown; occiput deeply emarginate; head matte, without median groove on vertex; ocelli in small equilateral triangle, about the distance to each eye; antenna shorter than body, first three flagellomeres of equal length, the fourth and following becoming shorter and more slender; notauli very distinct anteriorly, less so behind; mesoscutum and central part of scutellum minutely granular, matte; scutellar sulcus greatly reduced and not impressed; scutellum depressed at sides, with a large subtriangular, smooth, margined impression on each side, and a pair of small round foveae at apex, the two enclosed together in an oval margined line; propodeum with distinct median and a lateral longitudinal carina, more or less irregularly reticulate between the carinae, more coarsely posteriorly;
+T
+1 narrow; pterostigma less than half as wide as long, with vein r emitted from its middle, 1 - CU 1 as long as 2 - CU 1 (following
+Brues 1926
+).
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+South Africa
+.
+
+
+
+
+Host.
+
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+Note.
+
+No specimens were available for this study.
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/A3/DE/FB/A3DEFBBEACB256C1BFD9A1E2D859AA0F.xml b/data/A3/DE/FB/A3DEFBBEACB256C1BFD9A1E2D859AA0F.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..40720e579eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/A3/DE/FB/A3DEFBBEACB256C1BFD9A1E2D859AA0F.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,372 @@
+
+
+
+Afrotropical Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with description of four new species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Liu, Zhen
+0000-0002-8670-0205
+Changde Key Innovation Team for Wetland Biology and Environmental Ecology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde 415000, China & Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Polaszek, Andrew
+0000-0002-7171-3353
+Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-10-22
+
+
+1216
+
+
+83
+100
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1216.133127
+04C335D9-5252-499F-A004-7C9C2220C88C
+
+
+
+
+
+Centistidea longipedes
+Liu & Polaszek
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 4
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length
+2.2 mm
+, dark brown; head 1.7 × as wide as long, 1.3 × wider than mesoscutum; eyes 1.5 × longer than temple in dorsal view; temple with transverse wrinkles in between, not constricted behind eyes in dorsal view; distance between fore and a hind ocellus 1.2 × longer than minor axis of a hind ocellus,
+POL
+:
+OD
+:
+OOL
+= 1.2: 1.0: 3.2; frons flat and nearly polished except extremely fine transverse wrinkles; vertex between eye and hind ocellus shiny and sculptured as temple; face shiny, with extremely fine setose punctures, indistinctly convex medially, transverse, 1.4 × wider than high; clypeus 2.2 × wider than medial length, nearly polished; antenna 1.2 × longer than body length, with 1
+st
+, 2
+nd
+, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 6.3, 6.7, 3.8, and 4.6 × longer than wide, 1
+st
+1.1 × longer than 2
+nd
+; mesoscutum with superficial and extremely small punctures, intervals with extremely fine wrinkles, notauli obvious, crenulated to anterior 1 / 3; scutellar sulcus straight and crenulated; medio-posterior depressions on scutellum large and oblong, virtually touching each other; propodeum with distinct median carinae just reach costulae, anterior parts with indistinct punctures and several short rugae alongside median carinae, 2.5 × longer than median length of metanotum, posterior parts polished; hind leg extremely long, 2.6 × than metasoma; pterostigma narrow, 3.7 × as long as its widest part; vein 1 -
+R
+1 0.3 of length of pterostigma;
+T
+1 poorly defined, 2.8 × longer than its maximum width;
+T
+2 1.2 × wider than median length;
+T
+3 0.9 × length of
+T
+2, not longitudinally striate.
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Male.
+Body length
+2.2 mm
+, fore wing length
+2.6 mm
+(Fig.
+4 a
+).
+
+
+
+
+Head
+.
+
+Transverse in dorsal view, 1.7 × as wide as long, 1.3 × wider than mesoscutum. Eyes 1.5 × longer than temple in dorsal view (Fig.
+4 b
+). Temple slightly shiny, small setose punctures with transverse wrinkles in between, not constricted behind eyes in dorsal view. Ocelli small, distance between fore and a hind ocellus 1.2 × longer than minor axis of a hind ocellus,
+POL
+:
+OD
+:
+OOL
+= 1.2: 1.0: 3.2. Frons flat and nearly polished except extremely fine transverse wrinkles. Vertex between eye and hind ocellus shiny and sculptured as temple. Face (Fig.
+4 c
+) shiny, with extremely fine setose punctures, indistinctly convex medially, transverse, 1.4 × wider than high. Clypeus 2.2 × wider than medial length, nearly polished. Length of malar space 1.6 × basal width of mandible. Antenna (Fig.
+4 d
+) 1.2 × longer than body length, with scape, pedicel and 1
+st
+, 2
+nd
+, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 2.3, 1.9, 6.3, 6.7, 3.8 and 4.6 × longer than wide, 1
+st
+1.1 × longer than 2
+nd
+, flagellomeres gradually shortened to apex.
+
+
+
+Mesosoma
+.
+
+Length: width: height = 10: 4.6: 6.5. Mesoscutum (Fig.
+4 e
+) shiny with superficial and extremely small punctures, intervals with extremely fine wrinkles, notauli obvious, crenulated to anterior 1 / 3. Scutellar sulcus slightly curved, crenulated. Scutellum shiny, sculptured as mesoscutum, medio-posterior depressions large and oblong, virtually touching each other. Propodeum (Fig.
+4 j
+) highly shiny, with distinct median carinae just reaching costulae, anterior parts with indistinct punctures and several short rugae alongside median carinae, 2.5 × longer than median length of metanotum, posterior parts polished. Mesopleuron (Fig.
+4 f
+) highly polished, impunctate.
+
+
+
+Legs
+.
+
+Hind leg (Fig.
+4 i
+) remarkedly long, 2.6 × than metasoma. Hind femur 4.1 × as long as its widest part. Length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 2.2: 3.2: 1.0. Basitarsus of hind leg 0.6 × as long as tarsomeres 2–5.
+
+
+
+Wings
+.
+
+Fore wing (Fig.
+
+4 g
+
+): pterostigma narrow, 3.7 × as long as its widest part; vein 1 -
+R
+1 0.3 of length of pterostigma; vein r: 2 - SR: 2 - M = 1.0: 5.3: 3.4, 1 - SR: 1 - M = 1.0: 4.0, 1 - CU 1: 2 - CU 1 = 1.0: 2.2; first discal cell of fore wing nearly 1 / 5 wider than high. Hind wing (Fig.
+4 h
+): vein M + CU: 1 M: 1 r-m = 1.5: 1.9: 1.0.
+
+
+
+Metasoma
+.
+
+Indistinctly longer than mesosoma.
+T
+1 (Fig.
+4 k
+) highly polished, poorly defined, spatula-shaped, 2.8 × longer than its maximum width, distinctly narrowed anterior-medially.
+T
+2 1.2 × wider than median length;
+T
+3 0.9 × length of
+T
+2, smooth without longitudinal striae.
+
+
+
+Colour
+.
+
+Dark brown (Fig.
+4 a
+). Palpi and spurs honey yellow. Antenna dark brown. Legs yellow, except apical 1 / 3 of hind tibia and hind tarsus brown. Wing membrane hyaline, pterostigma yellow-brown, vein r, 2 - SR, 1 - SR, 1 - M and 1 - CU 1 yellow-brown, other veins pale.
+
+
+Female.
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+
+Host.
+
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+Material examined
+
+
+
+(
+
+NHMUK
+
+).
+
+Holotype
+
+
+: •
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Cameroon
+,
+Mt
+Cameroon
+,
+Mann’s Quelle
+(
+
+2256 m
+
+),
+M Steele
+,
+
+4. II. 1932
+
+,
+B. M.
+1934-240,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639754
+
+.
+
+
+Paratype
+
+: •
+1 ♂
+,
+Uganda
+,
+Ruwenzori Range
+,
+Bigo
+(
+
+3475 m
+
+),
+DS Fletcher
+,
+
+20–22. VII. 1952
+
+,
+No.
+NHMUK 010639740
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+Cameroon
+,
+Uganda
+.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The specific name
+
+“
+longipedes
+
+” derives from Latin, referring to the extremely long hind legs.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+
+
+This species is similar to
+
+C. leucopterae
+(
+Wilkinson, 1936
+)
+
+but differs in the following: temple not constricted behind eyes in dorsal view (distinctly constricted in
+
+C. leucopterae
+
+);
+T
+2 1.2 × wider than median length (3.3 × wider in
+
+C. leucopterae
+
+); and
+T
+3 polished (longitudinally striate in
+
+C. leucopterae
+
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/BC/84/D8/BC84D8AC9D645E0C9686B868BA97E471.xml b/data/BC/84/D8/BC84D8AC9D645E0C9686B868BA97E471.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a9c6e7a66fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/BC/84/D8/BC84D8AC9D645E0C9686B868BA97E471.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
+
+
+
+Afrotropical Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with description of four new species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Liu, Zhen
+0000-0002-8670-0205
+Changde Key Innovation Team for Wetland Biology and Environmental Ecology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde 415000, China & Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Polaszek, Andrew
+0000-0002-7171-3353
+Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-10-22
+
+
+1216
+
+
+83
+100
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1216.133127
+04C335D9-5252-499F-A004-7C9C2220C88C
+
+
+
+
+
+Centistidea areolaris
+Liu & Polaszek
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 1
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length 2.0 mm, light red-brown; eyes 1.8 × longer than temple in dorsal view; temple smooth, superficially punctate, indistinctly constricted behind eyes in dorsal view; hind ocelli in a shallow depression, distance between fore and a hind ocellus 1.2 × longer than minor axis of a hind ocellus,
+POL
+:
+OD
+:
+OOL
+= 1.3: 1.0: 2.9; vertex between eye and hind ocellus nearly smooth except some extremely fine transverse wrinkles; face nearly polished except some punctures along eyes, not convex medially, 1.5 × wider than high; antenna nearly as long as body length, with 1
+st
+, 2
+nd
+, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 4.9, 5.5, 2.7 and 3.0 × longer than wide, 1
+st
+indistinctly longer than 2
+nd
+; mesoscutum with superficial and weakly-defined punctures anteriorly and laterally, largely smooth dorsally, notauli less obvious, weakly crenulated near to anterior 1 / 3; scutellar sulcus concave but not crenulated; medio-posterior depressions of scutellum large and oblong, both enclosed by a margined line; propodeum with distinct median carina and carinate-areolate elements medio-apically; pterostigma narrow, 2.9 × as long as its widest part; vein 1 -
+R
+1 attenuated to 0.3 of length of pterostigma;
+T
+1 3.9 × longer than its maximum width, radially striate at lateral membranous area;
+T
+2 triangular part 1.3 × wider than median length;
+T
+3 1.9 × longer than
+T
+2.
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+
+
+Female.
+Body length 2.0 mm, fore wing length
+2.5 mm
+(Fig.
+1 a
+).
+
+
+
+
+Head
+.
+
+1.8 × as wide as long, 1.2 × wider than mesoscutum. Eyes 1.8 × longer than temple in dorsal view (Fig.
+1 b
+). Temple a little shiny, smooth, superficially punctate, sparsely pubescent, indistinctly constricted behind eyes in dorsal view. Ocelli small, hind ocelli in a shallow dimple, distance between fore and a hind ocellus 1.2 × longer than minor axis of a hind ocellus,
+POL
+:
+OD
+:
+OOL
+= 1.3: 1.0: 2.9. Frons flat and polished. Vertex between eye and hind ocellus shiny and nearly smooth except some extremely fine transverse wrinkles. Face (Fig.
+1 c
+) shiny, nearly polished except some punctures along eyes, not convex medially, transverse, 1.5 × wider than high. Clypeus 2.0 × wider than medial length, nearly polished. Length of malar space 1.4 × longer than width of mandible. Antenna (Fig.
+1 d
+) nearly as long as body length, with scape, pedicel and 1
+st
+, 2
+nd
+, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 1.4, 1.6, 4.9, 5.5, 2.7 and 3.0 × longer than wide, 1
+st
+indistinctly longer (nearly 1.1 ×) than 2
+nd
+, flagellomeres gradually shortened to apex.
+
+
+
+Mesosoma
+.
+
+Length: width: height = 1.4: 1.0: 1.2. Mesoscutum (Fig.
+1 c
+) shiny with superficial and weakly defined punctures anteriorly and laterally, largely smooth dorsally, notauli less obvious, weakly crenulated near to anterior 1 / 3. Scutellar sulcus slightly curved, concave, not crenulated. Scutellum shiny, sculptured as dorsal mesoscutum, medio-posterior depressions large and oblong, both enclosed by a margined line. Propodeum (Fig.
+1 k
+) shiny with distinct median carinae reaching posterior margin, rugulose anteriorly, with carinate-areolate elements medio-apically. Mesopleuron (Fig.
+1 f
+) highly polished, impunctate.
+
+
+
+Legs
+.
+
+Hind femur (Fig.
+1 j
+) 3.7 × as long as its widest part. Length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 2.0: 2.4: 1.0. Basitarsus of hind leg 0.6 × as long as tarsomeres 2–5.
+
+
+
+Wings
+.
+
+Fore wing (Fig.
+
+1 g
+
+): pterostigma narrow, 2.9 × as long as its widest part (Fig.
+1 b
+); vein 1 -
+R
+1 attenuated to 0.3 length of pterostigma; vein r: 2 - SR: 2 - M = 1.0: 7.7: 3.0, 1 - SR: 1 - M = 1.0: 6.1, 1 - CU 1: 2 - CU 1 = 1.0: 1.7; first discal cell of fore wing nearly 1.2 × wider than high. Hind wing (Fig.
+1 h
+): vein M + CU: 1 - M: r-m = 2.0: 2.2: 1.0.
+
+
+
+Metasoma
+.
+
+0.9 × length of mesosoma.
+T
+1 (Fig.
+1 i
+) highly polished, spatula-shaped, 3.9 × longer than its maximum width, distinctly narrowed anterior-medially, radially striate at lateral membranous area.
+T
+2 triangular part 1.3 × wider than median length, longitudinally striate at lateral membranous area.
+T
+3 1.9 × longer than
+T
+2, weakly longitudinally striate. Hypopygium shorter than length of metasoma. Ovipositor sheath (Fig.
+1 l
+) 1.3 × longer than hind basitarsus, with long and dense setae apically.
+
+
+
+Colour
+.
+
+Light red-brown, except apex of metasoma darker brown (Fig.
+1 a
+). Palpi and spurs pale yellow. Antenna and apical ovipositor sheath dark brown. Legs yellow except apical tarsomeres. Wing membrane hyaline, pterostigma yellow-brown, vein 1 - SR, 1 - M and 1 - CU 1 brown, other veins brown.
+
+
+Male.
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+
+Host.
+
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+Material examined
+
+
+
+(
+
+NHMUK
+
+).
+
+Holotype
+
+
+: •
+
+1 ♀
+,
+South Africa
+,
+Port St. John
+, Pondoland,
+RE Turner
+,
+
+12–30. VI. 1923
+
+, Brit. Mus 1923-363, No.
+NHMUK 010639675
+
+.
+
+
+Paratype
+
+: •
+1 ♀
+, same data except
+
+IX. 1923
+
+, Brit. Mus 1923-510, No.
+NHMUK 010639676
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+South Africa
+.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+
+
+The specific name “
+areolaris
+” refers to the propodeum with carinate-areolate elements medio-apically.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+
+
+This species is similar to the Neotropical species,
+
+C. vertus
+(
+Papp, 2013
+)
+
+. Its peculiar propodeum is very rare in
+Miracinae
+with both median carina and areola present, but differs in the following: antenna slightly shorter than body length, with penultimate flagellomere 2.7 × longer than wide (antenna 1.2 × longer than body length, with penultimate flagellomere 4.0 × longer than wide in
+
+C. vertus
+
+); medio-posterior depressions on scutellum distinct in an enclosed oval margined line (absent in
+
+C. vertus
+
+); and
+T
+2 gradually wider basally (narrowly parallel-sided basally in
+
+C. vertus
+
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/E1/2D/EC/E12DEC9F0E405F4A8CF2537A146490DF.xml b/data/E1/2D/EC/E12DEC9F0E405F4A8CF2537A146490DF.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d184360085f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/E1/2D/EC/E12DEC9F0E405F4A8CF2537A146490DF.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,435 @@
+
+
+
+Afrotropical Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with description of four new species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Liu, Zhen
+0000-0002-8670-0205
+Changde Key Innovation Team for Wetland Biology and Environmental Ecology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde 415000, China & Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Polaszek, Andrew
+0000-0002-7171-3353
+Natural History Museum, London, UK
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-10-22
+
+
+1216
+
+
+83
+100
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1216.133127
+04C335D9-5252-499F-A004-7C9C2220C88C
+
+
+
+
+
+Centistidea leucopterae
+(
+Wilkinson, 1936
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 2
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Mirax leucopterae
+
+Wilkinson, 1936: 385
+.
+Holotype
+in
+
+NHMUK
+
+, examined.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Mirax leucopterae
+
+
+:
+
+De Saeger 1944: 36
+
+;
+
+Decelle 1962: 189
+
+;
+
+Nixon 1965: 9
+
+;
+
+Shenefelt 1973: 678
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length 1.5–2.0 mm, mostly black (Fig.
+2 a
+); head exceedingly minutely punctate, more densely so on the face than on the frons and vertex (Fig.
+2 b, c
+); ocelli in a small equilateral triangle which about the length to each eye; flagellum of female rather shorter, and of male rather longer, than body; mesoscutum and disc of scutellum (Fig.
+2 e
+) throughout regularly, minutely punctate; notauli very distinct on anterior declivity; scutellar sulcus greatly reduced; propodeum (Fig.
+2 h
+) with a very strong median longitudinal carina, which bifurcates at about the middle and forms a pair of very strong, diverging carinae, punctate and setiferous anterolaterally, impunctate elsewhere; vein r (Fig.
+
+2 g
+
+) emitted before middle of pterostigma;
+T
+1 long and narrow, broadened in apical half;
+T
+2 (Fig.
+2 l
+) entirely smooth except two or three minute punctures, membranous lateral basal areas with fine longitudinal aciculation;
+T
+3 with some minute punctures across apical third or fourth, otherwise almost throughout with fine longitudinal aciculation.
+
+