From 1fa654c658188bc60dad6d72f07a0e58b11a7e20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ggserver Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 17:43:11 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add updates up until 2025-05-29 17:38:07 --- .../87/03D98786916AFF92C7690157FE08B013.xml | 275 ++++++++++++++++++ .../87/03D98786916BFF94C541006DFEFFBE5F.xml | 173 +++++++++++ .../87/03D98786916BFF95C51B04A5FE36B172.xml | 249 ++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 697 insertions(+) create mode 100644 data/03/D9/87/03D98786916AFF92C7690157FE08B013.xml create mode 100644 data/03/D9/87/03D98786916BFF94C541006DFEFFBE5F.xml create mode 100644 data/03/D9/87/03D98786916BFF95C51B04A5FE36B172.xml diff --git a/data/03/D9/87/03D98786916AFF92C7690157FE08B013.xml b/data/03/D9/87/03D98786916AFF92C7690157FE08B013.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ae50df17fba --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/D9/87/03D98786916AFF92C7690157FE08B013.xml @@ -0,0 +1,275 @@ + + + +Five new species of the millipede family Trichopolydesmidae from Peru (Diplopoda: Polydesmida) + + + +Author + +Golovatch, S. I. + +text + + +Arthropoda Selecta + + +2024 + +2024-03-31 + + +33 + + +1 + + +1 +13 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.15298/arthsel.33.1.01 + +journal article +10.15298/arthsel.33.1.01 +0136-006X +15539733 + + + + + + +Genus + +Cryptogonodesmus +Silvestri. 1898 + + + + + + + +Type +species: + +Cryptogonodesmus clavidives +Silvestri, 1898 + +, from La Moca, southeast of Carácas, +Miranda state +, +Venezuela +[ +Silvestri, 1898 +], non + +Cryptogonodesmus +sensu +Carl [1914] + +, revised by +Golovatch [1994] +. + + +COMPOSITION. According to +Golovatch [1994] +, the genus is monobasic, but presently it is to be supplemented by further three congeners: + +C. latior +( +Golovatch, 1994 +) + +, + +comb.n. + +ex + +Brachycerodesmus + +, + +C. sacciformis + +sp.n. +and + +C. unciger + +sp.n. + + + + +Indeed, because a gonopodal conformation similar to that of + +Cryptogonodesmus + +is also observed in + +Brachycerodesmus +Carl, 1914 + +, both these genera had been synonymized [ +Golovatch, 1992 +] until +Golovatch [1994] +revalidated + +Brachycerodesmus + +on account of a somewhat less strongly developed and more deeply sunken gonotelopodite relative to the coxite. In the light of certain new species reported here from +Peru +, this distinction, however, needs revision. + + + +Figs 8–10. + +Cryptogonodesmus sacciformis + +sp.n. +, ♂ paratype. 8 — both gonopods +in situ +, ventral view; 9, 10 — right gonopod, caudal and oral views, respectively. Abbreviations: +ca +— cannula; +cx +— coxite; +sg +— seminal groove; +te +— telopodite. Photograph by K.V. Makarov (8), taken not to scale; scale bar: 0.2 mm (9, 10). + + +Рис. 8–10. + +Cryptogonodesmus sacciformis + +sp.n. +, паратип ♂. 8 — оба гонопода на месте, сниЗу; 9, 10 — правый гонопод, соответственно сЗади и спереди. ОбоЗначениЯ: +ca — +канюлЯ; +cx +— коксит; +sg +— семенной канал; +te +— телоподит. ФотографиЯ К.В. Макарова (8), снЯта беЗ масштаба; масштаб: 0,2 мм (9, 10). + + + + +Brachycerodesmus + +has hitherto been considered as encompassing the following species: + +B. petersi +Carl, 1914 + +(the +type +species) and + +B. fuhrmanni +( +Carl, 1914 +) + +, both from +Colombia +, + +B. peruvianus +( +Kraus, 1954 +) + +, + +B. oxapampaensis +Kraus, 1960 + +and + +B. tarmaensis +Kraus, 1959 + +, all from +Peru +, and + +B. latior +Golovatch, 1994 + +, from Central Amazonia of +Brazil +[ +Golovatch, 1994 +]. One more species, + +B. albus +(Verhoeff, 1941) + +, is to be added as well (see below). + + +Whereas all above congeners except + +B. latior + +show very considerably elaborate gonopodal telopodites [ +Carl, 1914 +; Verhoeff, 1941; +Kraus, 1954 +, +1959 +, +1960 +], as opposed to quite simple, voluminous and sacciform ones in + +B. latior + +and + +Cryptogonodesmus clavidives + +[ +Golovatch, 1994 +], also given two new + +Cryptogonodesmus +species + +put on record below, the generic diagnosis of + +Cryptogonodesmus + +seems best to be amended as follows. + + + +DIAGNOSIS. This genus can be characterized by a hypertrophied, simple, more or less sac-shaped and strongly exposed gonopodal telopodite relative to a moderately to strongly developed, invariably simple and poorly excavate gonocoxite [Golovatch, 1994]; a parabasal to distal solenomere located fully on mesal face, at most being short, rudimentary or missing. + +Sac-shaped structures are occasionally observed in the gonopodal telopodites of some + +Brachycerodesmus +spp. + +as well, but these are small and clearly subordinate to the other, more complex elements. In contrast, the sac-shaped gonotelopodites in + +Cryptogonodesmus + +are by far the main and fully exposed structures of the gonopods. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/D9/87/03D98786916BFF94C541006DFEFFBE5F.xml b/data/03/D9/87/03D98786916BFF94C541006DFEFFBE5F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7f16b00938c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/D9/87/03D98786916BFF94C541006DFEFFBE5F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ + + + +Five new species of the millipede family Trichopolydesmidae from Peru (Diplopoda: Polydesmida) + + + +Author + +Golovatch, S. I. + +text + + +Arthropoda Selecta + + +2024 + +2024-03-31 + + +33 + + +1 + + +1 +13 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.15298/arthsel.33.1.01 + +journal article +10.15298/arthsel.33.1.01 +0136-006X +15539733 + + + + + + +Moojenodesmus simplex + + +sp.n. + + + + + + +Figs 1–4 +. + + + + + +HOLOTYPE +♂ +( +ZMUM +), +Peru +, +Junin Region +, +Satipo +, S 11°15′15″, W °38′17″, fruit orchard, under wooden planks and stones, +21.IX.2017 +, K.Yu. Eskov leg. + + + +NAME +. To emphasize the unusually simple gonopods. + + + + +DIAGNOSIS. Differs from all 10 or 11 presently recognized congeners by the unusually simple gonopods ( +Fig. 4 +), which are basically sac-shaped, squarish and totally devoid of considerable outgrowths, and showing subequally high coxite ( +cx +) and telopodite ( +te +), the latter with only a rudimentary solenomere ( +sl +) that terminates a straight, fully mesal seminal groove ( +sg +). + + + + +DESCRIPTION. Length ca 10.5 mm, width of midbody pro- and metazonae 0.45 and 0.65 mm, respectively ( +♂ +). Colouration in alcohol uniformly light brown with lighter grey-brown paraterga and legs ( +Figs 1–3 +). Body with 20 segments. Tegument moderately shining, texture very delicately shagreened. Head unmodified, clypeolabral region very finely and densely pilose, vertex and occiput bare, genae squarish.Antennae medium-sized, clearly clavate due to highest antennomere 6 (height measured from the lower to the higher edge) ( +Figs 1–3 +), +in situ +reaching past ring 2 dorsally ( +♂ +). + + +In width, collum << head <ring 2 = 3 <4 <5=15, thereafter body gradually tapering towards telson ( +Fig. 1 +). Paraterga strongly developed, set high (at about upper ¼ midbody height), starting with collum, mostly subhorizontal, leaving dorsum largely slightly convex. Caudolateral corner of paraterga spiniform, postcollum ones extending increasingly past rear tergal margin, especially clearly so in rings 17 and 18. All poreless segments with two, all pore-bearing ones with three, minute, barely visible, setigerous incisions at lateral margin. Front margins of metaterga very narrowly bordered and forming distinct shoulders. Pore formula normal, ozopores evident pits, fully dorsal, located behind posteriormost marginal indentation at about caudal ¼ poriferous metaterga. Metatergal sculpture typical, poorly-developed, obliterate, with three transverse rows of typical (= polydesmid), setigerous, polygonal bosses ( +Figs 1–3 +). Tergal setae very short, slightly longer only on collum, simple, usually sharpened at tip, often obliterate. Stricture between pro- and metazona wide, shallow and nearly smooth. Limbus very thin and microdenticulate. Pleurosternal carinae absent. Epiproct rather short, conical, pre-apical lateral papillae very small ( +Figs 1, 3 +). Hypoproct semi-circular; caudal, paramedian, setigerous papillae very distinct and well-separated cones ( +Fig. 3 +). Sterna without modifications, setose. Legs ( +♂ +) generally rather long and slender ( +Figs 1–3 +), ca 1.7–1.8 times as long as midbody height, very densely setose, almost all setae being simple; prefemora slender, devoid of lateral bulges ( +Fig. 3 +). In length, tarsus = femur> prefemur> postfemur = tibia> coxa ( +Fig. 3 +). + + + +Figs 5–7. + +Cryptogonodesmus sacciformis + +sp.n. +, ♂ paratype, habitus, dorsal, lateral and ventral views, respectively. Photographs by K.V. Makarov, taken not to scale. + + +Рис. 5–7. + +Cryptogonodesmus sacciformis + +sp.n. +, паратип ♂, обЩий вид, соответственно сверху, сбоку и сниЗу. Фотографии К.В. Макарова, снЯты беЗ масштаба. + + + +Gonopods ( +Fig. 4 +) with large, subquadrate and transverse coxites ( +cx +) strongly fused medially at base and carrying a few long setae ventrally; a long, simple and unciform cannula ( +ca +) as usual. Telopodite ( +te +) only slightly stouter than +cx +, also subquadrate, prefemorite (= densely setose part) much shorter than both +cx +and +te +; seminal groove ( +sg +) running over most of te extent on mesal side alone, straight, terminating on a very small solenomere ( +sl +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/D9/87/03D98786916BFF95C51B04A5FE36B172.xml b/data/03/D9/87/03D98786916BFF95C51B04A5FE36B172.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..66acbe008f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/D9/87/03D98786916BFF95C51B04A5FE36B172.xml @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ + + + +Five new species of the millipede family Trichopolydesmidae from Peru (Diplopoda: Polydesmida) + + + +Author + +Golovatch, S. I. + +text + + +Arthropoda Selecta + + +2024 + +2024-03-31 + + +33 + + +1 + + +1 +13 + + + + +https://doi.org/10.15298/arthsel.33.1.01 + +journal article +10.15298/arthsel.33.1.01 +0136-006X +15539733 + + + + + + +Genus + +Moojenodesmus +Schubart, 1945 + + + + + + + +Fig. 4. + +Moojenodesmus simplex + +sp.n. +, ♂ holotype, right gonopod, caudal view. Abbreviations: +ca +— cannula; +cx +— coxite, +sg +— seminal groove; +sl +— solenomere; +te +— telopodite. Scale bar: 0.2 mm. + + + + +Type +species: + +Moojenodesmus pygmaeus +Schubart, 1945 + +, from +Brazil +, by original designation + +. + + +COMPOSITION. In addition to + +Moojenodesmus pygmaeus + +, the following species are included in this genus: + +M. angulifer +(Peters, 1864) sensu +Carl, 1914 + +, from +Colombia +, + +M. armatus +( +Kraus, 1959 +) + +and + +M. polydesmoides +( +Kraus, 1960 +) + +, both from +Peru +, + +M. arenicola +Golovatch, 2001 + +, + +M. bethaniae +Golovatch, 1992 + +, + +M. irmgardae +Golovatch, 1992 + +, + +M. susannae +Golovatch, 1992 + +and + +M. wellingtoni +Golovatch, 1994 + +, all from the environs of Manaus, +Brazil +, + +M. schubarti +Golovatch et Gallo + +in +Golovatch et al., 2022 +, a troglobiont from +Bahia state +, +Brazil +, as well as + +M. pumilus +Schubart, 1944 + +, from several other states of +Brazil +( +Rio de Janeiro +, +São Paulo +, Amazônas). The identity of + +M. pygmaeus + +vs + +M. pumilus + +is questioned [ + +Golovatch +et al. +, 2022 + +]. Because a key exists only to most species occurring near Manaus [Golovatch, 1994], all other relevant descriptions must be consulted for morphological comparisons [ +Carl, 1914 +; +Schubart, 1944 +, +1945 +; +Kraus, 1959 +, +1960 +; +Golovatch, 1992 +, +1994 +, +2001 +; + +Golovatch +et al. +, 2022 + +]. + + + +Рис. 4. + +Moojenodesmus simplex + +sp.n. +, голотип ♂, правый гонопод, сЗади. ОбоЗначениЯ: +ca — +канюлЯ; +cx +— коксит; +sg +— семенной канал; +sl +— соленомер; +te +— телоподит. Масштаб: 0,2 мм. + + + + +DIAGNOSIS. One of the most advanced genera of Trichopolydesmidae with a particularly deeply excavate and strongly enlarged, often transverse gonopodal coxites that form together a very prominent gonocoel cavity which conceals and protects usually rather complex, subtransverse and medially swollen telopodites, uni- to tripartite (including a more or less distinct, mesal, solenomere branch), held parallel to each other [Golovatch 1992, 1994, 2001]. This condition is deemed to represent one of the most advanced in the gonopodal evolution of +Neotropical +Trichopolydesmidae +compared to the developments observed in most of the remaining eight genera that occur in the region [ +Golovatch, 1992 +, +1994 +, +2001 +; +Golovatch, Wytwer 2004 +; + +Golovatch +et al +., 2022 + +]. + + + + \ No newline at end of file