diff --git a/data/03/A6/09/03A60936AC702318FF353B752E28FC18.xml b/data/03/A6/09/03A60936AC702318FF353B752E28FC18.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9461197482f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/A6/09/03A60936AC702318FF353B752E28FC18.xml @@ -0,0 +1,2276 @@ + + + +Clematis sinii and C. xinhuiensis (Ranunculaceae), respectively described from Guangxi and Guangdong of China, are merged with C. meyeniana, a species widely distributed in eastern and southeastern Asia + + + +Author + +Huang, Qiao-Lan +0009-0007-7425-6972 +Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China & Center of Conservation Biology, Core Botanical Gardens, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China & University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China +huangqiaolan@scbg.ac.cn + + + +Author + +Fei, Wen-Qun +0000-0001-9942-2120 +Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China & Center of Conservation Biology, Core Botanical Gardens, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China & University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China +feiwenqun@scbg.ac.cn + + + +Author + +Wu, Hai-Song +0000-0003-3023-7220 +Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China & Center of Conservation Biology, Core Botanical Gardens, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China & University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China +wuhaisong21@mails.ucas.ac.cn + + + +Author + +Zeng, You-Pai +0000-0003-3259-8011 +Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China & Center of Conservation Biology, Core Botanical Gardens, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China +zengyoupai@scbg.ac.cn + + + +Author + +Yuan, Qiong +0000-0003-2613-5045 +Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China & Center of Conservation Biology, Core Botanical Gardens, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China +yuanqiong@scib.ac.cn + + + +Author + +Yang, Qin-Er +0000-0002-6261-0731 +Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China & Center of Conservation Biology, Core Botanical Gardens, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, China +qeyang@scib.ac.cn + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2024 + +2024-06-07 + + +652 + + +3 + + +171 +207 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.652.3.1 + +journal article +301778 +10.11646/phytotaxa.652.3.1 +0e85aa1c-0ce9-45d3-bafb-02595129d8de +1179-3163 +13216707 + + + + + + +Clematis meyeniana +Walpers (1843: 297) + +. +Figs. 1–18 +, +21 +, +22 +. + + + + + +Type:— +CHINA +. Hong Kong: Lantao Island (= Lantau Island), Cape Syng-moon, +August 1831 +, +F.J.F. Meyen s.n. +(B, not seen). = + +Clematis oreophila +Hance ex Walpers (1851: 3) + +. + + +Type:— +CHINA +. Hong Kong, ad montium cacumina, +H.F. Hance 486 +(probably +holotype +, K000675068!). +Fig. 21 +. + + + + + += + + +Clematis meyeniana +var. +insularis +Sprague (1916: 46) + + +. + + + + + +Type:— +CHINA +. Taiwan: Taipei, Danshui (Tamsuy), +R. Oldham 1 +( +holotype +K000815943!, +isotypes +LE!, P!). +Fig. 22 +. + + + + + += + + +Clematis meyeniana +f. +major +Sprague (1916: 46) + + +. + + + + + +Type:— +CHINA +. +Guangdong +: North River, +C. Ford 106 +( +holotype +K, not seen). + + + + + += + + +Clematis meyeniana +f. +retusa +Sprague (1916: 46) + + +. + + + + + +Type:—no +type +designated (see below for a discussion). + + + + += + +Clematis xinhuiensis +Wang (1999: 26) + +, + +syn +. +nov +. + + + + + +FIGURE 24 +. Type material of + +Clematis craibiana + +. A, B. Myanmar, Maymyo Plateau, +J.H. Lace 6122 +(E). C. +J.H. Lace 6122 +(K). + + + + +FIGURE 25 +. Two collections of + +Clematis armandi + +or + +C. jialasaensis +var. +macrantha + +from northeastern Yunnan, China, previously misidentified as + +C. meyeniana + +. A. China, Yunnan, Shuifu, Tchen-fong-chan (Chengfeng Shan), +J.M. Delavay 4 +(P). B, C. China, Yunnan, Shuifu, Long-ki, +J.M. Delavay 5146 +(P). + + + + +FIGURE 26 +. Holotype (A) and isotype (B) sheets of + +Clematis jialasaensis +var. +macrantha + +, China, Yunnan, Shuifu, Tchen-fong-chan (= Chengfeng Shan), +F +. +Ducloux 2021 +(P). + + + + +Type:— +CHINA +. +Guangdong +: Xinhui, Gudoushan Forestry Plantation, Wuzhishan reservoir, +11 September 1981 +, +W.C. Ko & B.H. Chen +112 +( +holotype +IBSC +!, +isotype +HGAS +!). +Fig. 1 +. + + += + +Clematis sinii +Wang (2001a: 314) + +, + +syn +. +nov +. + + + +Type:— +CHINA +. +Guangxi +: +Dayao +Shan, Kuchun, +27 June 1931 +(not 1937 as given by Wang (2001a) in the protologue), +S.S. Sin 23329 +( +holotype +IBSC +, not seen). + + + + +Description +:—Vines woody. Branches shallowly longitudinally 10-grooved. Leaves usually ternate, rarely simple; petiole +2–11 cm +long, sparsely puberulous, glabrescent; leaflet blades ovate, elliptic-ovate, or narrowly ovate, 3.5–12 (–14) cm long, 1.5–5 (–9.5) cm broad, subleathery to papery, both surfaces sparsely puberulous, glabrescent, adaxially smooth or rarely finely rugose, base rounded, subcordate, or broadly cuneate, margin entire, apex acuminate to acute; basal veins abaxially prominent. Cymes axillary or terminal, usually panicle-like and many-flowered, rarely few-flowered; peduncle +2.6–7.5 cm +long, sparsely puberulous; bracts subulate, +3.5–6 mm +long. Flowers +1.6–2.5 cm +in diameter. Pedicel +0.6–1.6 cm +long, puberulous or rarely glabrous, mostly 2-bracteolate below the middle; bracteoles very small, +0.5–0.8 mm +long. Sepals 4, white, or rarely pinkish outside, narrowly oblong to lanceolate, +8–13 mm +long, +2.2–4 cm +broad, both surfaces glabrous. Stamens +5–9.5 mm +long, glabrous; anther narrowly oblong to linear, +3–5.5 mm +long, apex minutely apiculate. Ovaries puberulous. Styles +5–9 mm +long, densely villous. Achenes falcate-lanceolate, 5–6– +7.5 cm +long, sparsely puberulous; persistent style +2–4 cm +long, yellow plumose. + + +Phenology +:—Flowering from June to August; fruiting from August to October. + + + + +Distribution and habitat +:— + +Clematis meyeniana + +is widely distributed in eastern and southeastern Asia, including +China +, +Japan +, +Laos +, +Myanmar +, +Thailand +, the +Philippines +, and +Vietnam +. In +China +, it occurs in +Fujian +, +Guangdong +, +Guangxi +, +Guizhou +, +Hainan +, +Hong Kong +, Hunan, Jiangxi, +Macao +, +Taiwan +, Yunnan, and Zhejiang ( +Fig. 23 +), growing in bushes or sparse forests, or by streams at elevations of +20−1800 m +above sea level. + + + +FIGURE 27 +. Four specimens of +M.Y. He and Z.M. Tan 117028 +from Leibo in Sichuan, China, a collection cited under both + +Clematis armandi + +and + +C. jialasaensis +var. +macrantha + +by Wang (2003). A. CDBI. B–D. PE. + + + +Additional specimens examined +(only those from China cited herein):— +CHINA +. + +Fujian + +: Changting, +C.M. Hu +3713 +(IBSC, LBG, PE); Dehua, +Y.Q. Ye 149 +(FJSI); Liancheng, + +Xiamen Univ. Meihua +Shan +Exped. 1009 + +(AU), +1279 +(AU); Longyan, +Y. Ling 4457 +(AU, PE), +X.F. Zeng ZXF29322 +(CZH); Nanjing, +Xiamen Univ. Exped. 93 +(PE), +228 +(PE), +340 +(PE), +1103 +(KUN, PE), +H.J. Zheng & J.D. Huang 10228 +(AU); Nanping, +G.S. He 994 +(FJSI, PE), +X.Y. Jiang 20160801B13 +(AU), +Z.Y. Li 11221 +(PE); Pinghe, +Y.B. Chen 826 +(FJSI), +835 +(FJSI, PE), +G.S. He 1181 +(FJSI, IBK, PE), +2055 +(FJSI), +2154 +(FJSI), +2192 +(FJSI), +X.F. Zeng ZXF20921 +(CZH), +ZXF23106 +(CZH), +ZXF26887 +(CZH), +ZXF28757 +(CZH), +ZXF28914 +(CZH), +ZXF34346 +(CZH) +X.Q. Zhang 12234 +(AU); Putian, +Y.Y. Fang & Y.F. Gao 106 +(FJIDC); Shunchang, +M.S. Li & Z.Y. Li 5384 +(FJSI, PE); Tong’an, +Y.B. Chen 2813 +(FJSI); Wuping, +Meihua Shan Exped. 134 +(FJSI, IBSC); Wuyishan, +Anonymous FN31 +(PE), +G.C. Chang & B.H. Chen 43 +(IBSC), +C.P. Chien et al. 400433 +(PE), +Sci. Exped. 790097 +(FJIDC), +Wuyi Exped. 80-0644 +(IBSC), +s.n. +(FJSI); Yongchun, +Anonymous 638 +(N), +22269 +(AU, CAF, N), +J.C. Lim 3867 +(AU); Yunxiao, +X.F. Zeng ZXF28264 +(CZH), +ZXF32692 +(CZH), +ZXF33325 +(CZH); Zhangpu, +236-6 Exped. 1151 +(PE), +X.F. Zeng ZXF31593 +(CZH); Zhao’an, +Anonymous s.n. +(FJIDC), +X.F. Zeng ZXF21411 +(CZH), +ZXF28158 +(CZH), +ZXF30927 +(CZH), +ZXF31008 +(CZH), +ZXF31321 +(CZH); Precise locality unknown, +Anonymous 456 +(N), +Anonymous 51651 +(CAF), +G. Ho 2252 +(PE), +L.K. Ling 142 +(AU). +Guangdong +: Boluo, +H.K. Chun 41192 +(IBK, IBSC, JXU, KUN, PE, SN, SYS, SZ), +Q.W. Fei HQL111 +(IBSC), +Levine et al. 6838 +(IBSC), +E.D. Merrill 11031 +(NYBG), +W.T. Tsang 9937 +(IBSC, NAS, PE, US), +K. Tung 78 +(L), +Y.Q. Wang 15 +(IBSC), +280 +(IBSC), +1221 +(IBSC), +C.F. Wei 121749 +(IBK, IBSC, KUN, PE, SZ), +Yue-78 6146 +(IBSC), +6174 +(IBSC); Chao’an, +F.Y. Zeng 1262 +(IBSC), +1367 +(IBSC), +X.F. Zeng ZXF2188 +(IBSC), +ZXF2335 +(IBSC), +ZXF2791 +(IBSC), +ZXF9809 +(CZH); Dabu, +S.C. Lee 202714 +(HHBG, HIB, IBK, IBSC, PE), +X.W. Wang 115 +(IBSC); Deqing, +Y.K. Lau 00938 +(GZAC, HHBG, IBSC, PE); Dianbai, +H.G. Ye 6277 +(IBSC); Fengkai, +Anonymous 0940 +(IBSC), +B.H. Chen 1472 +(IBSC), +K.C. Ting 6033 +(IBSC); Fengshun, +H.G. Ye 4101 +(IBSC), +X.F. Zeng ZXF00894 +(CZH), +ZXF00901 +(CZH), +ZXF2152 +(CZH, IBSC), +ZXF5771 +(CZH), +ZXF6372 +(CZH), +ZXF8115 +(CZH), +ZXF21215 +(CZH), +ZXF21600 +(CZH); Gaoyao, +Y.K. Lau 01656 +(IBSC,PE), +G.L. Shi 341 +(IBSC), +1024 +(HITBC), +12495 +(IBSC), +13076 +(IBSC, PE), +13112 +(IBSC, PE), +13128 +(IBSC, PE), +13686 +(IBSC, WUK), +14077 +(IBSC), +14310 +(IBSC), +15311 +(IBSC), +K.C. Ting & G.L. Shi 912 +(IBSC, L), +1042 +(IBSC), +1560 +(IBSC, WUK), +10306 +(IBSC), +C.L. Tso 21415 +(IBSC), +S. Wang 161890 +(IBSC), +P.C. Zhou 10374 +(HITBC, PE); Guangzhou, +Sino-German. Exped. 1017 +(IBSC), +L. Teng 8751 +(AU, IBK, IBSC, KUN, PE), +S. Wang 164682 +(IBSC, PE), +C. Wright s.n. +(NYBG), +H.G. Ye 7132 +(IBSC); Haifeng, +Anonymous 8338 +(IBSC), +C.F. Wei 121426 +(IBSC, NAS, PE); Heping, +G.C. Chang 156 +(IBSC), +261 +(IBSC), +Heping Exped. 552 +(IBSC); Huaiji, +B.H. Chen 1271 +(IBSC), +Y.K. Lau 02673 +(HHBG, IBSC, PE), +W.T. Tsang 22741 +(IBSC, IBK), +22912 +(IBSC, P), +23112 +(IBSC), +23183 +(IBSC); Huidong, +B.Y. Chen & G.C. Chang 698 +(IBSC), +B.Y. Chen et al. 106 +(IBK, IBSC), +C.F. Wei 121071 +(IBSC, PE); Huilai, +C.L. Tso 23450 +(IBSC); Huiyang, +B.H. Chen 509 +(IBSC), +W.T. Tsang 25454 +(IBSC), +25615 +(IBSC), +25803 +(E, IBSC), +25825 +(E, IBSC); Jiangmen, +Gudou Shan Group 20098227 +(SN), +200808434 +(SN); Jiedong, +X.F. Zeng ZXF31692 +(CZH); Jiexi, +R.J. Wang & Y.D. Xu WRJ6179 +(IBSC), +X.F. Zeng ZXF21070 +(CZH), +ZXF31285 +(CZH); Lechang, +Z.Z. Cao & Y.S. Ye 3696 +(IBSC), +4527 +(IBSC), +4642 +(IBSC), +Z.Z. Cao & J.W. Zhai 4740 +(IBSC), +P.M. Chang 20132 +(IBSC), +B.Y. Chen et al. 2546 +(IBSC, IBK), +2602 +(IBSC, IBK), +2905 +(IBSC, IBK), +T.S. Chu 043 +(IBSC), +166 +(CAF), +C.L. Lo 744 +(IBSC), +746 +(IBSC), +H.Y. Mai 20914 +(PEY), +C.L. Tso 20879 +(AU, IBSC, NYBG), +21186 +(IBK, IBSC, NYBG), +S. Wang 163002 +(IBSC); Liannan, +Y.Q. Cheng 170381 +(IBSC), +P.C. Tam 59555 +(IBSC, PE); Lianshan, +P.C. Tam 58216 +(IBK, IBSC), +58455 +(IBSC, PE), +58534 +(IBSC, PE), +58720 +(IBSC, PE); Lianzhou, +Nanling Exped. 182 +(IBSC); Longchuan, +B.H. Chen 987 +(IBSC), +X.F. Zeng ZXF22294 +(CZH), +ZXF22304 +(CZH); Longmen, +G.C. Chang 022 +(IBSC, HGAS), +S.C. Lee 200272 +(IBSC), +W.T. Tsang 25440 +(IBSC), +S. Wang 161974 +(IBSC), +X.W. Wang & G.C. Chang 8133 +(HGAS, IBK, IBSC); Lufeng, +C.F. Wei 121273 +(IBSC, NAS, PE), +121314 +(IBK, IBSC, PE); Luoding, +N. Liou & H.G. Ya 2320 +(IBSC); Maoming, +L. Teng 1708 +(PE), +1833 +(IBSC, PE), +003167 +(HITBC); Meizhou, +J.L. Gressitt 1415 +(E); Qingyuan, +South China Agr. Univ.-Xianhu Bot. Gard. Exped. SCAUF661 +(SZG), +C. Wang 30632 +(IBSC, PE, WUK), +30690 +(IBSC), +F.W. Xing et al. 1483 +(IBSC); Qujiang, +F.W. Xing 1483 +(IBSC); Raoping, +X.F. Zeng ZXF6244 +(CZH), +ZXF30532 +(CZH); Renhua, +L. Teng 7186 +(AU, IBK, IBSC, WUK), +W.T. Tsang 26185 +(IBSC), +26270 +(IBSC); Ruyuan, +Ao73 01095 +(PE), +Z.C. Chen et al. 0507104 +(SZG), +S.K. Lau 28911 +(IBK), +N.H. Xia & N. Liu 012 +(IBSC), +384 +(IBSC), +Yue-71 443 +(IBSC), +Yue-73 00593 +(HGAS, IBSC), +1095 +(HGAS, IBSC); Shenzhen, +Q.L. Huang & K.Y. Qiu 087 +(IBSC), +Q.L. Huang & H.S. Wu 088 +(IBSC), +Shenzhen Exped. 584 +(PE, SZG), +1669 +(PE, SZG), +G.D. Wang et al. 6753 +(SZG), +6908 +(SZG), +6988 +(SZG), +7086 +(SZG), +7093 +(SZG), +7316 +(SZG), +7391 +(SZG), +7550 +(SZG), +7773 +(SZG), +7945 +(SZG), +F.W. Xing & Y.X. Zhang 10741 +(IBSC), +11593 +(IBSC), +X.S. Xu & Y.Q. Yang 011700 +(SZG), +Y.C. Xu 1404 +(SZG), +S.Z. Zhang & Z.C. Chen 011094 +(SZG), +S.Z. Zhang et al. 2666 +(SZG), +3499 +(SZG, PE), +3870 +(SZG), +3911 +(SZG), +4015 +(SZG), +4054 +(SZG), +4068 +(SZG), +4178 +(SZG), +4335 +(SZG), +4544 +(SZG), +4817 +(SZG), +4897 +(SZG), +7093 +(SZG), +012589 +(SZG), +SCAUF805 +(SZG), +SCAUF1008 +(SZG); Taishan, +Anonymous 8070 +(IBSC), +8090 +(IBSC); Wengyuan, +S.K. Lau 24076 +(IBK); Wuhua, +Q.L. Huang & H.S. Wu 089 +(IBSC); Xinfeng, +H.G. Ye 950 +(IBSC), +Q.F. Yi et al. 2810 +(IBSC); Xinhui, +Y.K. Lau 2461 +(HHBG, HIB), +Y.P. Zeng et al. 475 +(IBSC); Xinyi, +S.P. Ko 51669 +(IBK, IBSC, PE), +C. Wang 30966 +(IBK, IBSC, PE, SYS), +H.G. Ye 7822 +(IBSC); Xingning, +X.F. Zeng ZXF22085 +(CZH), +ZXF27989 +(CZH); Xuwen, +Xuwen Exped. 00460 +(PE); Yangchun, +N. Liu et al. 255 +(IBSC), +C.L. Lo 1220 +(IBSC), +H.G. Ye 6093 +(IBSC); Yangshan, +Liangguang Exped. 0320 +(PE), +Mountain Veg. Group 102 +(IBSC), +Nanling Exped. 1678 +(IBSC), +L. Teng 123 +(IBSC), +246 +(IBK, IBSC); Yingde, +W.Y. Chun 7058 +(IBSC, SYS), +7148 +(IBSC, SYS), +Y. Tsiang 567 +(IBK, IBSC, NAS, SYS), +60882 +(AU, IBK, IBSC, PE, WUK), +60901 +(IBK, IBSC, PE), +H.Y. Liang 60977 +(AU), +61255 +(IBK, IBSC, PE, WUK); Yunfu, +E.T. Liu 001 +(IBSC), +C. Wang 37267 +(IBSC), +40819 +(IBSC); Zhuhai, +B.H Chen 643 +(IBSC), +Yue-73 3086 +(IBSC), +3089 +(IBSC), +J.Q. Yun & S.W. Deng 150448 +(IBSC); Precise locality unknown, +W.Y. Chun 5654 +(IBSC), +Nanjing Univ. s.n. +(N), +Shaoguan Exped. 1214 +(IBSC), +Yue-74 4997 +(IBSC). +Guangxi +: Beiliu, +M.J. Liang 66299 +(PE), +L.J. Luo 450981130626003LY +(GXMG); Cangwu, +Z.Y. Ni & C.C. Huang +13076 (GXMG); Cenxi, +Y.L. Zhu et al. 450481121128019LY +(GXMG); Chongzuo, +H.Y. Liang 67397 +(IBK, IBSC), +Nonggang Exped. 10412 +(HITBC), +11694 +(HITBC); Daxin, +G.Z. Li & S.C. Tang 313 +(IBK), +H.Z. Lv et al. 451424150910068LY +(GXMG); Dongxing, +H.Y. Liang 69548 +(IBK); Fangcheng, +W.T. Tsang 26589 +(P); Fengshan, +H.Z. Lv et al. 451223130830031LY +(GXMG), +451223130329090LY +(GXMG); Gongcheng, +Gongcheng Exped. 0235 +(IBK), +Y.K. Li 402888 +(IBK, IBSC); Guanyang, +Z.Z. Chen 52206 +(IBK, IBSC); Guilin, +C.S. Chung 808876 +(IBSC); Guiping, +Anonymous 16819 +(PE); Hezhou, +C.T. Li 604108 +(IBSC), +Y. Liu et al. H0056 +(PE), +H0182 +(IBK, PE); Huanjiang, +S.H. Chun 15484 +(IBK, IBSC, KUN, NAS, PE, WUK); Jinxiu, +Y.C. Chen 1061 +(IBK), + +Dayao +Shan Exped. 10235 + +(IBK, IBSC), +11445 +(IBK, IBSC), +11479 +(IBSC), +12867 +(IBK, IBSC), +M. Guo et al. 451324130717015LY +(GXMG), +Q.L. Huang & K.Y. Qiu 086 +(IBSC), +Y.K. Li 400784 +(IBK, IBSC, WUK), +C.H. Lui 4502 +(IBSC, PE), +4568 +(IBSC, PE), +Y.M. Zhao et al. 1932 +(GXMG); Jingxi, +C.C. Chang 15182 +(IBK, IBSC), +Y.S. Huang et al. LYJX0131 +(GXMG), +S.P. Ko 55689 +(IBK, IBSC), +H.Z. Lv & R.L. Mo 16841 +(GXMG), + +T. Yi et al. +14082902 + +(IBSC); Lingui, +W.Q. Chen 0565 +(IBSC), +Z.Z. Chen 51148 +(IBK, IBSC), +52833 +(IBK), +Lingui Exped. 450322130729033LY +(GXMG); Lingchuan, +Linchuan Exped. 450323130928014LY +(GXMG); Lingyun, +R.C. Ching 6890 +(IBSC, NAS, NYBG, PE, SYS), +S.K. Lau 28460 +(IBK, IBSC), +28642 +(IBK, IBSC, PE, SZ), +28652 +(IBSC, PE, SZ); Liuzhou, +C.S. Chung 82482 +(IBK); Longlin, +L.Y. Yu et al. 451031150310062LY +(GXMG), +Zhongzhilianguangxi Exped. 3041 +(PE); Longsheng, +Anonymous 105 +(PE), +Guangfulinqu Exped. 00846 +(IBK, IBSC, PE, SZ), +00900 +(IBK, IBSC, PE, SZ), +00982 +(IBK, IBSC, PE), +00997 +(IBK, IBSC, PE, SYS, SZ), +G.Z. Li 62784 +(IBK), +Longsheng Exped. 450328140811092LY +(GXMG, IBK), +450328140813039LY +(GXMG, IBK), +450328140826008LY +(GXMG, IBK), +C.H. Lui & Y.T. Wei 20255 +(IBK), +H.F. Tan 700767 +(FJSI, IBK, IBSC, NAS), +H.F. Tan & C.T. Li 70580 +(IBK, IBSC), +71216 +(IBK, IBSC), +S.L. Yu & H.F. Tan 700502 +(GAC, IBK); Longzhou, +H.Y. Liang 65802 +(IBK), +T.Y. Tu 633 +(IBSC); Luocheng, +PE 895763 +(PE), +S.H. Chun 14980 +(IBK, IBSC, KUN, NAS, PE); Mashan, +H.C. Chung 301536 +(IBK); Napo, +Huanan Exped. 1131 +(PE), +Y.F. Huang & J. Huang HYF0031 +(GXMG), +HYF0547 +(GXMG), +HYF0821 +(GXMG), +N.F. Li et al. GXMG1348 +(GXMG); Nanning, +Guangxi Exped. 2748 +(PE), +K.L. Liang 12106 +(GXMG), +W.T. Tsang 21844 +(WUK); Ningming, +C.C. Chang 12890 +(IBK, IBSC), +Y.S. Chen 5033 +(PE), +Guangxi Museum 7686 +(IBSC); Pingxiang, +Beijing Youth Exped. 0917 +(PE), +S.X. Yu 3081 +(PE); Qinzhou, +H. Zhu et al. 450703140705006LY +(GXMG); Quanzhou, +C.S. Chung 81518 +(IBSC), +83301 +(IBK, IBSC), +Quanzhou Exped. 450324121013036LY +(IBK, GXMG), +Y.M. Zhao et al. GXMG200 +(GXMG); Rongshui, +S.H. Chun 14497 +(IBK, IBSC), +15858 +(IBK, IBSC, WUK), +15966 +(IBSC, WUK), +16230 +(IBK, IBSC, WUK), +16701 +(IBK, IBSC, WUK), +G.R. Long 4814 +(PE), +C.H. Lui 2597 +(HITBC, IBK, IBSC), +Rongshui Exped. 450225121202002LY +(GXMG), +450225131006017LY +(GXMG), +Z.Y. Yuan 1154 +(CAF); Shangsi, +W.T. Tsang 22672 +(IBK, IBSC, P, WUK), +23866 +(NYBG), +24092 +(IBSC, NYBG), +24157 +(IBSC, NYBG), +K. Wang et al. 1041 +(IBK); Tengxian, +L.H. Chun 91288 +(IBK, IBSC); Tian’e, +Beijing Exped. 890603 +(PE); Tianlin, +C.T. Li 600903 +(IBK), +Tianlin Exped. 451029130719024 +(GXMG, GXMI), +451029130719067 +(GXMI), +451029130724014 +(GXMG, GXMI), +451029130909035 +(GXMG, GXMI), +451029130914009 +(GXMG, GXMI); Wuming, +X.X. Huang et al. 09849 +(IBSC), +R.L. Mo & Y.Q. Su 993 +(GXMG), +H. Wang 5865 +(PE); Wuzhou, +S.K. Lee 81291 +(PE); Xing’an, +Z.Z. Chen 51220 +(IBK, IBSC), +51328 +(IBK, IBSC, KUN, PE, WUK), +51663 +(IBK, IBSC, PE), +F.H. Hsieh & S.K. Lee 30-18 +(IBK), +G.Z. Li 15012 +(PE), +15249 +(PE), +Xing’an Exped. 450325140723012LY +(GXMG), +450325140913033LY +(GXMG), +Y.M. Zhao et al. 282 +(GXMG); Zhaoping, +C.Z. Jiang & M.S. Hsia 4336 +(IBK, IBSC); Ziyuan, +C.S. Chung 83608 +(IBK, IBSC, PE), +T.A. Huang 60910 +(IBSC); Precise locality unknown, +Anonymous s.n. +(IBSC), +Anonymous s.n. +(PE), +Z.Z. Chen 51584 +(IBK, IBSC), +R.C. Ching 6840 +(PE), +7390 +(PE), +G.W. Groff 655 +(PE), +Guangxi Exped. 323 +(PE), +S.S. Sin 21666 +(IBSC), +22408 +(IBSC), +22433 +(IBSC), +W.T. Tsang 23350 +(IBK). +Guizhou +:Anlong, +C.Z. Dang 1113 +(HGAS); Congjiang, +T.F. Huang 01216 +(HGAS, TIE); Jiangkou, +T.S. Chang 401911 +(HGAS), +C.P. Chien 30588 +(HGAS); Kaili, +Qiannan Exped. 01689 +(HGAS, PE), +02227 +(HGAS, NAS, PE), +03821 +(HGAS, KUN, NAS, PE, SZ); Leishan, +C.P. Chien et al. 50855 +(HGAS, PE); Libo, +Guizhou Univ. Agr. Inst. Exped. 8-704 +(GZAC), +Y.K. Li 9767 +(HGAS), +Libo Exped. 1135 +(HGAS, PE); Liping, +J.M. Yuan 00276 +(HGAS); Rongjiang, +C.P. Chien et al. 51363 +(PE), +51425 +(HGAS, PE), +Guiyang Exped. 74-919 +(HGAS), +Qiannan Exped. 02833 +(NAS, PE); Xingren, +T.S. Chang & Y.T. Chang 8438 +(HGAS, IBK, IBSC, PE, WUK), +8488 +(NAS, PE), +C.Z. Dang 1582 +(HGAS), +Guizhou Exped. 7465 +(IBK, IBSC, NAS, PE); Xingyi, +T.S. Chang & Y.T. Chang 6821 +(WUK), +7112 +(HGAS, IBSC, PE); Zhenfeng, +C.Z. Dang 2562 +(HGAS), +Y. Tsiang 4537 +(E, IBSC, NAS, PE); Precise locality unknown, +J. Cavalerie 4263 +(P). +Hainan +: Lingao, +W.T. Tsang 15708 +(US); Yazhou, +S.K. Lau 596 +(N); Precise locality unknown, +P.C. Tam 61853 +(IBK, IBSC), +61955 +(IBK, IBSC). + +Hong Kong + +: +E. Bodinier 680 +(E), +K.Y. Chan 1176 +(P, PE), +1512 +(PE), +T.C. Chen 10 +(IBSC), +N.K. Chun 41849 +(IBK, IBSC, KUN, NAS, PE), +W.Y. Chun 3157 +(IBSC, NYBG), +9153 +(IBSC), +9154 +(IBSC), +9155 +(IBSC), +9156 +(IBSC), +5002A +(IBSC), +J. Esquirol 1164 +(P), +C. Ford s.n. +(NYBG, P), +R. Fortune 51 +(P), +H.F. Hance 388 +(P), +Hu & But 22711 +(L), +S.Y. Hu 8337 +(PE), +8338 +(PE), +10556 +(PE), +10611 +(PE, US), +10710 +(PE), +10779 +(PE), +12322 +(PE), +12849 +(PE), +P.W.W. Joseph 257 +(P), +P.W.W. Joseph & T.K. Woo 324 +(P), +808 +(P), +F.A. McClure 00106 +(NYBG), +Y.W. Taam 1464 +(NYBG), +1639 +(G, NYBG, US), +2123 +(NYBG), +Y. Tsiang 668 +(E, IBSC), +707 +(IBK, IBSC, PE), +3008 +(IBSC), +3019 +(IBSC, NYBG), +C.L. Tso 21830 +(IBK, IBSC), +22571 +(IBSC), +C. Wang 3055 +(IBSC, PEY), +3240 +(IBSC, P), +C. Wright s.n +(NYBG), +C. Wright s.n +(P), +F.W. Xing 7431 +(IBSC), +7701 +(IBSC), +K.X. Xu 023177 +(SZG), +024084 +(SZG). +Hunan +: Hongjiang, +C.T. Lee 3008 +(IBSC, PE); Jianghua, +Y.K. Li 401292 +(IBK); Jiangyong, +P.C. Tam 62295 +(IBK); Lanshan, +X.X. Huang et al. 14709 +(IBSC); Ningyuan, +P.C. Tam 61730 +(IBK); Suining, +J.J. Zhou & D. Zhou 13658 +(CSFI); Wugang, +Anonymous 11136 +(WU), +L.H. Liou & K.C. Ho 15961 +(IBSC, PE, WUK), +P.C. Tsoong 1299 +(PE), +C.F. Zhang 1746 +(PE); Xinning, +P.C. Tam 63320 +(IBK, IBSC); Yizhang, +Centr. South Univ. Forest. Techn. 301 +(WUK), +S.H. Chun 2045 +(IBK, IBSC, KUN, PE, SZ), +5449 +(IBSC), +M.S. Huang 111268 +(IBSC), +S.K. Lau 29711 +(IBSC), +B.Z. Xiao 4381 +(PE), +4477 +(PE), +4627 +(PE), +S.H. Yu 53 +(WUK). +Jiangxi +: Anfu, +Jiangxi Exped. 946 +(PE); Chongyi, +Anonymous 16067 +(JXU); Dayu, +M.H. Nieh et al. 9485 +(IBK, IBSC, LBG, SHM), +C.S. Yok et al. 1335 +(IBSC, PE); Ganzhou, +C.B. Yang & K. Yao 1204 +(IBSC, NAS, PE), +X.F. Zeng ZXF13656 +(CZH); Ji’an, +S.H. Lai 792 +(LBG); Jinggangshan, +S.H. Lai et al. 4350 +(IBSC, LBG); Lianhua, +S.H. Lai 1506 +(LBG, KUN, PE), +1589 +(LBG, PE); Luxi, +W.Z. Tan et al. LXP-13-08396 +(SYS); Pingxiang, +Jiangxi Exped. 457 +(PE), +2760 +(LBG, PE), +Y.K. Xsiung 8476 +(LBG); Quannan, +Anonymous 01389 +(LBG); Shangrao, +Anonymous 9707170 +(JXU); Shangyou, +Jiangxi Group (70)483 +(PE); Suichuan, +Z.C. Liu et al. LXP-13- 17869 +(SYS); Xingguo, +Xinguo Acad. 485 +(LBG, PE); Xunwu, +C.M. Hu 1429 +(IBSC), +Y. Lin 15140 +(JXU), +15231 +(JXU), +C.S. Yok et al. 2018 +(IBSC, PE), +2068 +(IBSC, PE); Yongxin, +S.H. Lai 1117 +(LBG, PE). + +Macao + +: +G.H. Vachell 254 +(E). + +Taiwan + +: +Hsinchu +, +K.C. Yang 5558 +(P), +K.C. Yang et al. 02797 +(P), +s.n. +(P); +Hualien +, +T.T. Chen et al. 12327 +(PE), +K.U. Kramer et al. 8173 +(U), +C.C. Liao et al. 1558 +(L), +C.C. Yen Yang08766 +(IBSC, P, PE); Ilan, +S.T. Chiu et al. 07538 +(P); +Kaohsiung +, +C.S. Wang et al. 1051 +(E), +T.Y.A. Yang et al. 7496 +(IBSC, L, P); +Nantou +, +C.F. Chen 4392 +(KUN), +T.Y.A. Yang et al. 6046 +(PE, P); +Taichung +, +Y. Endo 2014 +(NYBG), +K.C. Yang et al. 02487 +(P); +Taipei +, +S.T. Chiu 07472 +(P), +T.S. Hsieh et al. s.n. +(PE), +T.Y.A. Yang et al. 16772 +(P); +Taoyuan +, +A. Hsiao 591 +(CSH); Precise locality unknown, +Anonymous m114 +(JXU), +U. Faurie 170 +(E). +Yunnan +: Funing, +C.W. Wang 89140 +(HITBC, IBK, IBSC, PE, WUK); Hekou, +W.S. Liou 139 +(LBG), +278 +(LBG, PE), +298 +(HITBC); Jiangcheng, +Jiangcheng Exped. 5308260554 +(IMDY), +T.H. Li 3367 +(HITBC, KUN), +S.Y. Zhang & Q.H. Hu YNS1262 +(KUN), +S.S. Zhou 10380 +(HITBC); Jinping, +P.I. Mao 415 +(PE); Jinghong, +C.W. Wang 78284 +(IBSC, LBG, PE, WUK), +G.D. Tao 17790 +(IBSC), +G.D. Tao et al. 19879 +(HITBC), +H. Wang 6137 +(HITBC, IBSC, PE); Lianghe, +Lianghe Exped. 5331220575 +(IMDY); Luoping, +Hongshuihe Exped. 1852 +(PE); Maguan, +T. Zhang et al. 08CS551 +(KUN); Malipo, +Y.M. Shui et al. 21224 +(PE), +43456 +(PE); Mengla, +Anonymous 267 +(PE), +Mengla Exped. 5328231159 +(IMDY); Menglian, +Menglian Exped. 9577 +(IBSC, KUN); Pu’er, +H. Wang 4801 +(IBSC, PE), +S.S. Zhou 10656 +(HITBC); Shuangjiang, +G.S. Sin 865 +(IBSC, LBG, KUN, PE, WUK), +1192 +(IBSC, PE, KUN, WUK); Simao, +A. Henry 12270 +(E, US), +12270A +(NYBG), +P.I. Mao 5784 +(IBSC, KUN, PE, WUK), +S.S. Zhou 46 +(IBSC); Tengchong, +Anonymous 151 +(IBSC), +G. Forrest 8839 +(P), +E.B. Howell 42 +(IBSC), +T.H. Li & P.H. Yu 20522 +(HITBC), +20639 +(HITBC); Wenshan, +Y.M. Shui 003186 +(PE); Yingjiang, +Y.J. Guo et al. 13CS7769 +(KUN); Precise locality unknown, +M.B. Anty s.n. +(P), +J. Cavalerie 7872 +(E), +G. Forrest 11755 +(PE). +Zhejiang: +Longquan, +Anonymous 1534 +(ZM), +S.Y. Chang 2867 +(IBSC, PE), +X.K. Qin & S.J. Hao 16239 +(SHM); Qingyuan, +Q.C. Chen & J.H. Zhou 2211 +(PE). + + +Notes +:—When +Sprague (1916) +described + +C. meyeniana +f. +retusa + +as new, he did not cite any specimen under it. In the protologue, he gave the information of provenance of + +C. meyeniana +f. +retusa + +as “Locality unknown. The plant is stated to have been received from the +Hongkong +Botanic Garden in 1885” and cited “ + +C. Meyeniana + +, Hook. f. Bot. Mag. t. 7897, excl. syn.” immediately following the Latin diagnosis. According to +Hooker (1903) +, “the specimen figured was from a plant received from Mr. C. Ford, Superintendent of the +Hongkong +Botanic Garden, in 1855”. This suggests that a specimen of + +C. meyeniana +f. +retusa + +should be kept at K. However, we have been unable to trace the specimen from K. If the specimen cannot be found at K or any other herbaria, the line illustration in +Hooker (1903) +, which was excellently executed, seems to be considered the +type +of + +C. meyeniana +f. +retusa + +to guarantee the correct application of this name. It is worth mentioning that +Hooker’s (1903) +concept of + +C. meyeniana + +, which includes + +C. armandi + +as a synonym, is too broad indeed, and +Sprague (1916) +correctly excluded + +C. armandi + +from the synonymy of + +C. meyeniana + +. + + +Under + +Clematis meyeniana + +, a variety, i.e. + +var. +granulata +Finet & Gagnepain (1903) + +, has been generally recognized ( +Finet & Gagnepain 1907 +, +Sprague 1916 +, +Chun 1934 +, +Handel-Mazzetti 1939 +, +How & Wang 1964 +, +Anonymous 1972 +, +1984 +, +Chang 1980 +, Wang 1991, 2003, +Grey-Wilson 2001 +, +Johnson 2001 +, Wang & Bartholomew 2001, Yang +et al +. 2015). This variety, described from the +Hainan +Island of +China +, is different from the +type +variety, + +var. +meyeniana + +, by having leaflets finely rugose on upper side. +Chun (1934) +noted that “The + +var. +granulata + +is easily distinguished from + +C. meyeniana +Walp. + +by the granulated obscurely veined leaves, much smaller flowers, and especially by the very slender, almost filiform pedicels, an important distinction not mentioned by Finet & Gagnepain.” This variety is widely distributed in +China +( +Guangdong +, +Guangxi +, +Hong Kong +, southeastern Yunnan), +Laos +, and +Vietnam +. + + +The identity of + +Clematis meyeniana +var. +insularis +Sprague (1916: 46) + +has been a controversial matter. Sprague described it on the basis of four collections respectively from +China +( +Taiwan) +, +Japan +(Ryukyu Islands), and the +Philippines +(Luzon), with the K sheet of the +Taiwan +collection, +R. Oldham 1 +( +Fig. 22 +), designated as the +type +. In the protologue, Sprague stated that + +C. meyeniana +var. +insularis + +was distinguishable by the glabrous inflorescence often racemose or 3-flowered, and the sepals obviously longer than the stamens and mucronate. +Eichler (1958) +, +Grey-Wilson (2001) +, +Johnson (2001) +, and Wang (2001b) recognized + +C. meyeniana +var. +insularis + +as an independent taxon, but +Merrill & Rolfe (1908) +, +Ohwi (1965) +, +Liu & Hsieh (1976) +, Yang & Huang (1995), Tamura (1997), and Yang (2009), reduced it to the synonymy of + +C. meyeniana + +. Wang (2003), however, placed + +C. meyeniana +var. +insularis + +in synonymy with + +C +. +finetiana + +. In the same paper, Wang (2003) proposed a new combination, + +C. finetiana +var. +lutchuensis +( +Koidzumi 1925: 14 +) Wang (2003: 127) + +based on +C. lutchuensis +Koidzumi (1925: 14) +, a name published based on material from +Japan +and previously treated as a synonym of + +C. meyeniana +var. +insularis + +by +Eichler (1958) +, +Grey-Wilson (2001) +, +Johnson (2001) +, and Wang (2001b). According to Wang (2003), the plants from Luzon, +Taiwan +and Ryukyu Islands previously referred to + +C. meyeniana + +or + +C. meyeniana +var. +insularis + +should belong to + +C. finetiana +var. +lutchuensis + +. +After checking many relevant specimens, here we accept the treatment of placing + +C. meyeniana +var. +insularis + +in synonymy with + +C. meyeniana + +. In + +C. meyeniana + +, the sepals are from obtuse to mucronate at apex, and the pedicels, as pointed out by Yang & Huang (1995), are from pubescent to glabrous. + + + +Clematis meyeniana +var. +uniflora +Wang (1998: 158) + +was described on the basis of a single specimen, +Longxishan Exped. 1528 +(PE, not shown here), from Jiangle county in +Fujian +, +China +. In the protologue, the author stated that it differed from the type variety, + +var. +meyeniana + +, by having 1-flowered axillary cymes. Since its description, + +C. meyeniana +var. +uniflora + +has been recognized as an independent taxon by +Grey-Wilson (2001) +, Wang & Bartholomew (2001), and Wang (2003), although Wang (2003) still cited only the +holotype +. As the material of + +C. meyeniana +var. +uniflora + +is very scanty, we put the problem with its identity aside for a further study. + + +In the taxonomic treatment given above, we have only cited the synonyms of + +Clematis meyeniana + +published from Chinese material, not including those published from non-Chinese material. + +Clematis hothae +Kurz (1877: 17) + +, which was described from Hotha in +Myanmar +, has been generally placed in synonymy with + +C. meyeniana + +since its description ( +Sprague 1916 +, +Grey-Wilson 2001 +, +Johnson 2001 +, Wang 2003). We have checked the original material of this name at Kew and we accept this treatment. + +Clematis craibiana +Lace (1915: 395) + +, which was also described from +Myanmar +, was reduced to the synonymy of + +C. meyeniana + +by +Sprague (1916) +(he specifically placed + +C. craibiana + +in synonymy with + +C. meyeniana +f. +major + +), a treatment accepted by +Handel-Mazzetti (1939) +, +Grey-Wilson (2001) +, +Johnson (2001) +, and Wang (2003). This treatment, however, may not be correct. From the +type +material of + +C. craibiana + +( +Fig. 24 +), it can be seen that no bracteoles are borne on most of the pedicels, a fairly constant character in + +C. meyeniana + +as we have mentioned above. In addition, + +C. craibiana + +was recorded to flower in March on the field labels of the +type +specimens, while + +C. meyeniana + +usually flowers from June to August. The absence of bracteoles on pedicels in + +C. craibiana + +and the flowering period in spring remind us of + +C. armandi + +, a species widely distributed in +China +, +Myanmar +, and +Vietnam +, and + +C. jialasaensis +Wang + +in +Wang & Li (1986: 268) +described from China’s southeastern Xizang (Mêdog). Although + +C. armandi + +may at once be distinguished from + +C. craibiana + +and + +C +. +jialasaensis + +by the presence of large scale-leaves at the base of inflorescences, this character is not always present on the specimens of this species, which usually include only a certain portion of a plant. In our survey of specimens of + +C. armandi + +, we found that scale-leaves are indeed often absent at the base of inflorescences in this species. Further studies are needed to determine the identities of + +C. craibiana + +and + +C +. +jialasaensis + +with certainty. + + +Similar to the case with the identity of + +C. craibiana + +is the problem with the identification of two collections, +J.M. Delavay 4 +(P; +Fig. 25A +) and +J.M. Delavay 5146 +(P; +Fig. 25B, C +), respectively from Tchen-fong-chan (Chengfeng Shan) and Long-ki both formerly belonging to Yanjin county but now Shuifu county in northeastern +Yunnan +, +China +. +Franchet (1886) +cited +J.M. Delavay 4 +under + +C. meyeniana + +, and +Finet & Gagnepain (1903) +and +Anonymous (1984) +cited both +J.M. Delavay 4 +and +J.M. Delavay 5146 +under this species, but Wang (2003) cited the G sheet of +J.M. Delavay 5146 +under + +C. finetiana +. + +These two collections, with no bracteoles borne on the pedicels, should not belong to + +C. meyeniana + +or + +C +. +finetiana + +. A new variety, + +C. jialasaensis +var. +macrantha +Wang (2001b: 4) + +, was described on the basis of a collection from Yanjin county in northeastern +Yunnan +, i.e. +F +. +Ducloux 2021 +(P; +Fig. 26 +. It seems that +J.M. Delavay 4 +and +J.M. Delavay 5146 +can be readily referred to + +C. jialasaensis +var. +macrantha + +, but the identity of + +C. jialasaensis +var. +macrantha + +itself, just like that of + +C. craibiana + +and of + +C. jialasaensis + +, is problematic. Under both + +C. armandi + +and + +C. jialasaensis +var. +macrantha +Wang (2003) + +, in the same paper, cited +M.Y. He and Z.M. Tan 117028 +(CDBI, PE, SZ; +Fig. 27 +), a collection from Leibo county in southwestern +Sichuan +, +China +. The only difference between + +C. armandi + +and + +C. jialasaensis +var. +macrantha + +seems to lie in the presence or absence of large scale-leaves at the base of inflorescences. Large scale-leaves are indeed present at the base of inflorescences on some sheets of the collection +M.Y. He and Z.M. Tan 117028 +( +Fig. 27B, D +), but absent on other sheets of the same collection ( +Fig. 27A, C +). Further studies are needed to determine the identity of + +C. jialasaensis +var. +macrantha + +with certainty and correctly identify the collections of +J.M. Delavay 4 +and +J.M. Delavay 5146 +. + + +When +Sprague (1916) +dealt with the taxonomy of + +Clematis meyeniana + +, he pointed out that the original descriptions of + +C. meyeniana + +and +C. oreophola +corresponded respectively to lower and upper portions of the plant. He thus further stressed that “much of the difficulty experienced in classifying the species and varieties of + +Clematis + +is due to the incompleteness of the specimens available for examination. The leaves and even the inflorescences often show considerable differences according to the part of the plant on which they are borne, and care and care should therefore be taken by collectors to obtain a series of specimens from the various parts of a single plant.” Although he may have wrongly reduced + +C. craibiana + +to the synonymy of + +C. meyeniana + +based on the +type +material which includes only portions of a plant, his suggestion on the collecting method of specimens of + +Clematis + +is worth being kept in the mind of collectors of plants in this genus. In our opinion, when classifying the species of + +Clematis + +, some of which are morphologically highly variable, the importance of using a combination of characters instead of relying on only a single character, cannot be over emphasized. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/A7/87/03A7873CFFE34537FF72236BFE8912C4.xml b/data/03/A7/87/03A7873CFFE34532FF72236BFF681545.xml similarity index 69% rename from data/03/A7/87/03A7873CFFE34537FF72236BFE8912C4.xml rename to data/03/A7/87/03A7873CFFE34532FF72236BFF681545.xml index e48eab1623b..fb7ce3331d3 100644 --- a/data/03/A7/87/03A7873CFFE34537FF72236BFE8912C4.xml +++ b/data/03/A7/87/03A7873CFFE34532FF72236BFF681545.xml @@ -1,75 +1,75 @@ - - - -Begonia dakrongensis (Begoniaceae), a new species from Dakrong Nature Reserve, Quang Tri province in Central Vietnam + + + +Begonia dakrongensis (Begoniaceae), a new species from Dakrong Nature Reserve, Quang Tri province in Central Vietnam - - -Author + + +Author -Nguyen, Cuong Huu -0000-0003-2281-741X -Vietnam National University of Forestry, 21 A Street, Xuan Mai, Chuong My, Hanoi, Vietnam -nguyenhuucuong.tvr@gmail.com +Nguyen, Cuong Huu +0000-0003-2281-741X +Vietnam National University of Forestry, 21 A Street, Xuan Mai, Chuong My, Hanoi, Vietnam +nguyenhuucuong.tvr@gmail.com - - -Author + + +Author -Le, Anh Tuan -0000-0002-5917-3243 -Mien Trung Institute for Scientific Research, Vietnam National Museum of Nature, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 321 Huynh Thuc Khang street, Thua Thien Hue, Vietnam -tasa207@gmail.com +Le, Anh Tuan +0000-0002-5917-3243 +Mien Trung Institute for Scientific Research, Vietnam National Museum of Nature, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 321 Huynh Thuc Khang street, Thua Thien Hue, Vietnam +tasa207@gmail.com - - -Author + + +Author -Ha, Van Bac -0009-0003-0024-2608 -Dakrong Natural Reserve, Ta Long, Dakrong, Quang Tri, Vietnam -havanbacklqt@gmail.com +Ha, Van Bac +0009-0003-0024-2608 +Dakrong Natural Reserve, Ta Long, Dakrong, Quang Tri, Vietnam +havanbacklqt@gmail.com - - -Author + + +Author -Lin, Che Wei -0000-0002-8564-5793 -Herbarium of Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, No. 53, Nan-Hai Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan -varalba@gmail.com +Lin, Che Wei +0000-0002-8564-5793 +Herbarium of Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, No. 53, Nan-Hai Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan +varalba@gmail.com -text - - -Phytotaxa +text + + +Phytotaxa - -2024 - -2024-04-18 + +2024 + +2024-04-18 - -645 + +645 - -1 + +1 - -85 -90 + +85 +90 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.645.1.8 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.645.1.8 -journal article -10.11646/phytotaxa.645.1.8 -1179-3163 -13214900 +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.645.1.8 +1179-3163 +13214900 - + @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ C.H.Nguyen, T.A.Le & C.W.Lin Type:— - + VIETNAM . Quang Tri province @@ -101,14 +101,12 @@ C.H.Nguyen, T.A.Le & C.W.Lin , Huc Nghi commune, -Dakrong Nature Reserve +Dakrong Nature Reserve , around point 16°27’46.9”N , 107°05’32.4”E -, common in the moist shady areas under evergreen primary evergreen forest on the rocky crevices in association with of waterfall -Do Quyen -at elevations of about +, common in the moist shady areas under evergreen primary evergreen forest on the rocky crevices in association with of waterfall Do Quyen at elevations of about 800 m a.s.l. @@ -128,7 +126,9 @@ a.s.l. holotype VNMN B0000608 -!; +!; + + isotype VNF 20230526010 !) @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ usually grows in moist shady places near waterfalls, along streams and occasiona a.s.l. - + Etymology: —The specific epithet refers to the @@ -228,17 +228,13 @@ locality (Dakrong Nature Reserve, Central Conservation status: -— - -The new species is known from a single collection, and we do not have information about its abundance at +—The new species is known from a single collection, and we do not have information about its abundance at type locality its conservation status is assessed as Data Deficient ( DD ; IUCN 2022 -) - -. +). Notes: @@ -257,46 +253,10 @@ and B. eberhardtii Gagnepain (1919: 198) -in their axillary and terminal inflorescence with densely bracts and flower structure, but these three species differ in many morphological characteristics. A detailed comparison is provided in Table 1. +in their axillary and terminal inflorescence with densely bracts and flower structure, but these three species differ in many morphological characteristics. A detailed comparison is provided in +Table 1 +. - - -FIGURE 1. - -Begonia dakrongensis -C.H.Nguyen, T.A.Le & C.W.Lin. A. Habit - -; B, B'. Portion of leaf, upper and lower surfaces; C. Stipule; D, D', D'', D'''. Bracts; E, E'. Staminate flower, face and side views; F, F'. Stamens, ventral and dorsal views; G, G'. Immature pistillate flower, face and side views; H, H'. Style and stigmatic band, ventral and dorsal views; I. Cross section of ovary; J. Capsule. - - - - -FIGURE 2. - -Begonia dakrongensis -C.H.Nguyen, T.A.Le & C.W.Lin. A. Habit - -and habitat; B. Habitats; C. Inflorescence, showing bracts, immature staminate flowers and capsule; D. Portion of leaf, upper surface, E. same, lower surface; F. Staminate flowers; G. Immature staminate flower; H. Staminate flower, face view; I. Immature pistillate flower; J. Cross section of ovary; K. Capsule. - - - -TABLE 1 -. Comparison of - -Begonia dakrongensis -C.H.Nguyen, T.A.Le & C.W.Lin - -, - -B. abbrevata -C.I Peng - -and - -B. eberhardtii - - -Gagnepain. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F9/87/03F987F4842FFFD25AABF583169FF9E3.xml b/data/03/F9/87/03F987F4842FFFD25AABF583169FF9E3.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b82e5b9764e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F9/87/03F987F4842FFFD25AABF583169FF9E3.xml @@ -0,0 +1,733 @@ + + + +Revisiting the nomenclature and taxonomy of the Malagasy Kalanchoe uniflora (K. subg. Alatae; Crassulaceae subfam. Kalanchooideae), which has Kitchingia uniflora as its basionym, and its homotypic and heterotypic synonyms + + + +Author + +Smith, Gideon F. + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2024 + +2024-04-18 + + +645 + + +1 + + +66 +76 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.645.1.6 + +journal article +301779 +10.11646/phytotaxa.645.1.6 +79310ed7-16b6-487c-a4b5-334ee67bc7a6 +1179-3163 +13214874 + + + + + + + + +Kalanchoe uniflora +(Stapf) +Hamet (1910: 52) + + +( +Figs 1 +and +2 +) + + + + + + +Basionym +:— + +Kitchingia uniflora +Stapf (1908: 258) + +. + + + + + +Type +:— +MADAGASCAR +. Ex hort., cultivated in the Living Collection at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, material originally received from Georges Bouvet (1850–1929), Angers, France, herbarium specimen (and cuttings) dispatched from France to Herb. K as early as + +January 1908 + +, with the (living) material grown at Kew and a (preserved) specimen deposited on + +10 April 1908 + +, + +Georges Bouvet +s.n + +. ( +lectotype +Herb. +K +barcode +K000232789 +! [image of the specimen accessible online at https://data.kew.org/records/occurrences/search?q=lsid:urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:274508- 1#tab_recordImages]), +here designated +( +Fig. 3 +) + +. + + + + +Homotypic synonym +:— + +Bryophyllum uniflorum +(Stapf) +Berger (1930: 412) + +. + + +Heterotypic synonyms +:— + +Kalanchoe ambrensis +Perrier de la Bâthie (1928: 23 + +[see also p. 30]); + +Bryophyllum ambrense +(H.Perrier) +Berger (1930: 412) + +. + + + + +Type +:— +MADAGASCAR +. Central-north Madagascar, Ambre massif [Montagne D’Ambre, Amber Mountains], between altitudes of 1000 and +1400 m +above sea level, flowers bright purple, +September 1926 +, [ + +J +. +M + +.] + +H + +.[ + +A + +.] +Perrier de la Bâthie 17735 +( + +here corrected to +lectotype + +, from +holotype +, the latter having been the interpretation of +Boiteau & Allorge-Boiteau (1995: 81) +, Herb. +P +barcode +P +00374201! [image of the specimen accessible online at http://coldb. mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00374201]), + +second-step +lectotype +here designated + +. + + + + +Designations not validly published +:—“ + +Kalanchoe uniflora +(Stapf) +Hamet (1910: 52) +var. +typica + +” Boiteau & Manonni (1949: 9), +nom. inval +. ( + +Turland +et al +. 2018 + +: Art. 24.3). + + + +FIGURE 2. +In terms of growth form, + +Kalanchoe uniflora + +fits in Group 6, +Creeping to trailing plants with weak stems +, recognised by Smith +et al +. (2023: 229, 236). The finely pubescent, urceolate to campanulate corolla tubes vary from reddish purple to reddish pink to red and are flared at the mouth. Photograph: Gideon F. Smith. + + + + +FIGURE 3. +Lectotype, +Georges Bouvet s.n +., Herb. K barcode K000232789 [image available at https://data.kew.org/records/occurrences/ search?q=lsid:urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:274508-1#tab_recordImages], designated in this paper, of the name + +Kitchingia uniflora + +, basionym of the name + +Kalanchoe uniflora + +. The following metadata are associated with this specimen: “MADAGASCAR. Ex hort., cultivated in the Living Collection at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, material originally received from Georges Bouvet (1850–1929), Angers, France, herbarium specimen (and cuttings) dispatched from France to Herb. K as early as January 1908, with the (living) material grown at Kew and a (preserved) specimen deposited on 10 April 1908” (see the main text for a discussion). Reproduced with the kind permission of the Director and the Board of Trustees, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. + + + +“ + +Kalanchoe uniflora +var. +brachycalyx + +” Boiteau & Manonni (1949: 9), +nom. inval +. ( + +Turland +et al +. (2018 + +: Art. 39.1). + + + +Nomenclatural notes on the +type +of + +Kitchingia uniflora +:—In the protologue of the name + +Kitchingia uniflora +, +Stapf (1908: 259) + +stated about this species: “ +MADAGASCAR +. The specimen from which this species is described was communicated by Mr. G. Bouvet, Director of the Jardin des Plantes at Angers [in France]. He [Bouvet] writes that it was apparently introduced with other plants sent from Madagascar to Dr. Bontemps of Saumure in France.” Stapf did not indicate whether “[…] the specimen […]” was of living or preserved material. It seems possible that both (1) a pressed specimen as well as (2) living material reached Otto Stapf, to whom the material was sent at Herb. K. Regardless, the Herb. K-held specimen with barcode K000232789 was clearly (prepared) of the material described by Stapf, apparently on +10 April 1908 +, even though it is not entirely clear whether the specimen was introduced into cultivation on that date, or whether the herbarium specimen was prepared on that date. However, material—both cuttings and flowers according to +Stapf (1909) +—were presented to Kew in +January 1908 +. + + +The herbarium specimen, here interpreted as +Georges Bouvet s.n +., is extraordinarily well-annotated, with the annotations including two letters that Bouvet sent to Herb. K. These two letters are dated “ +19 avril 1908 +” and “ +16 June 1908 +”, respectively, and were sent from Angers ( +Fig. 3 +). They were obviously dispatched to Herb. K after the material had been received, pressed, and grown at Kew. + + +Boiteau & Allorge-Boiteau (1995: 81) +stated that the “TYPE:” of the name + +Kalanchoe uniflora + +is “t. 8286, Stapf, Bot. +Mag. 1909 +”, i,e., +Stapf (1909 +: t. 8286). However, this plate was published a year after + +Kitchingia uniflora + +, basionym of + +Kalanchoe uniflora + +, was described, and does not constitute original material in the sense of + +Turland +et al +. (2018 + +: Articles 9.3 and 9.4) because + +Kitchingia uniflora + +was already described one year earlier sans that illustration. The Herb. K-held specimen, +Georges Bouvet s.n +., was clearly available to +Stapf (1908) +and represents original material. This specimen is here designated as +lectotype +, which supersedes the not effective typification of +Boiteau & Allorge-Boiteau (1995: 81) +. +Descoings (2003: 178) +repeated the not effective typification of the name + +Kalanchoe uniflora + +(essentially of its basionym + +Kitchingia uniflora + +) of +Boiteau & Allorge-Boiteau (1995: 81) +and stated: “ +T: +[icono]: Curtis’s Bot. Mag. 135: t. 8286, 1909”, with “ +T: +” being the “(nomenclatural) type” ( +Eggli 2003 +: X). + + + +Nomenclatural notes on the +type +of + +Kalanchoe ambrensis +:—About + +Kalanchoe ambrensis +, +Perrier de la Bâthie (1928: 24) + +stated: “Le +K +. [ + +Kalanchoe + +] + +ambrensis + +est commun dans le massif d’Ambre, entre 1.000 et +1.400 m +, d’altitude et ses belles corolles d’un pourpre brilliant ornent magnifiquement en saison sèche les grands troncs moussus des sombres forêts qui couvrent cette montagne ( +No +17735).” [English: “ +K +. [ + +Kalanchoe + +] + +ambrensis + +is common in the Ambre Massif, between altitudes of 1000 and +1400 m +, and in the dry season its beautiful, bright purple corollas beautifully decorate the large mossy trunks of the dark forests that cover this mountain [Ambre Massif] ( +No +17735).”]. The only material referenced by Perrier de la Bâthie was that provided with his number “( +No +17735).” + + +Boiteau & Allorge-Boiteau (1995: 81) +stated that the “ +Holo- +[P]” of the name + +Kalanchoe ambrensis + +, “Perrier 17735”, is held in Herb. P, while +Descoings (2003: 179) +did not reflect on the +types +of heterotypic synonyms; he included + +Kalanchoe ambrensis + +in the synonymy of + +Kalanchoe uniflora + +, a view also followed in the present paper. + + +Herb. P holds at least +two specimens +with the number [ +J.M. +] +H. +[ +A. +] +Perrier de la Bâthie 17735 +. These are, with their barcodes: + + +1. P00374201 http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00374201 [ +September 1926 +; vegetative and reproductive material]; and + + +2. P00374202 http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00374202 [ +September 1926 +; vegetative and reproductive material]. + + +Images of both specimens are available for examination online and both carry a date, “9/26”, i.e., +September 1926 +. The two preparations are not clearly labeled as being part of the same specimen and do not bear a single, original label in common, and therefore do not qualify, under + +Turland +et al +. (2018 + +: Art. 8.3), as a specimen mounted as more than one preparation. Even though they have the same Perrier de la Bâthie number, this two-specimen material therefore do not qualify as the +holotype +of the name + +Kalanchoe ambrensis + +, in contrast to the statement of +Boiteau & Allorge-Boiteau (1995: 81) +. + + +A third [ +J.M. +] +H. +[ +A. +] +Perrier de la Bâthie 17735 +specimen is held at Herb. K; the barcode of the specimen is K000232827. + + +Under + +Turland +et al +. (2018 + +: Note +1 in +Art. 40) the specimens that comprise the gathering +Perrier de la Bâthie 17735 +are +syntypes +, and it further cannot be confirmed that Perrier de la Bâthie did not additionally use any other elements when publishing the name + +Kalanchoe ambrensis + +. Use of “Holo-P” by +Boiteau & Allorge-Boiteau (1995: 81) +is therefore here corrected to +lectotype +( + +Turland +et al +. 2018 + +: Art. 9.10), and in a second-step lectotypification the first lectotypification of +Boiteau & Allorge-Boiteau (1995: 81) +is narrowed down to the Herb. P-held [ +J.M. +] +H. +[ +A. +] +Perrier de la Bâthie 17735 +specimen with the barcode P00374201 ( +Fig. 4 +). + + + +FIGURE 4. +Photograph of [ +J.M. +] +H. +[ +A. +] +Perrier de la Bâthie 17735 +, the second-step lectotype of the name + +Kalanchoe ambrensis + +, designated in this paper. Associated information includes: “[MADAGASCAR. Central-north Madagascar] Ambre massif [Montagne D’Ambre, Amber Mountains], between altitudes of 1000 and 1400 m, flowers bright purple, September 1926”. + +Kalanchoe ambrensis + +is a heteroptyic synonym of + +Kalanchoe uniflora + +. The specimen is held in Herb. P and its barcode is P00374201; [image accessible online at http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00374201]. Copyright of the +Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle +(MNHN—Paris, France), and reproduced with their permission, which is gratefully acknowledged. + + + + +FIGURE 5. +For the designation “ + +Kalanchoe uniflora +var. +brachycalyx + +”, +Boiteau & Mannoni (1949: 9) +cited a Jean-Henri Humbert specimen, as “HUMBERT 18.605, Bassin supérieur du Sambirano, entre le Haut Sambirano et le Haut Maivarano, vers 1.800 m.”, which would have been the type if “ + +Kalanchoe uniflora +var. +brachycalyx + +” had been validly published. The specimen is held in Herb. P and its barcode is P00444086. An image of the image is available at http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00444086. Copyright of the +Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle +(MNHN—Paris, France), and reproduced with their permission, which is gratefully acknowledged. + + + +Nomenclatural notes on the designations not validly published +:— +Boiteau & Mannoni (1949: 9) +did not validly publish “ + +Kalanchoe uniflora +var. +typica + +”, +nom inval +. ( + +Turland +et al +. 2018 + +: Art. 24.3), i.e., “ + +Kalanchoe uniflora +var. +uniflora + +” ( + +Turland +et al +. 2018 + +: Art. 22.3) and “ + +Kalanchoe uniflora +var. +brachycalyx + +” +Boiteau & Mannoni (1949: 9) +, +nom. inval +. ( + +Turland +et al +. 2018 + +: Art. 39.1). For “ + +Kalanchoe uniflora +var. +brachycalyx + +”, +Boiteau & Mannoni (1949: 9) +cited a Jean-Henri Humbert specimen “HUMBERT 18.605, Bassin supérieur du Sambirano, entre le Haut Sambirano et le Haut Maivarano, vers +1.800 m +.”, which would have been the +type +if “ + +Kalanchoe uniflora +var. +brachycalyx + +” had been validly published ( +Fig. 5 +). However, +types +are for names, in the sense of + +Turland +et al +. (2018 + +: Art. 6.3), and not for designations. + +The specimen is held in Herb. P and its barcode is P00444086. The image is available at http://coldb.mnhn.fr/ catalognumber/mnhn/p/p00444086. + +Amplified description of +Kalanchoe uniflora +:—Perennial, at first small-tuft-like, soon creeping to pendulously dangling or climbing, glabrous, sparsely to much-branched, typically epiphytic shrublets, with small, untidily rounded, usually dangling canopies, low-growing, succulent. +Stems +numerous, thin, flimsy, green at first, later greyish brown, ± leaning to creeping to pendent. +Leaves +many, persistent along length of stems, at first densely to, later, sparsely arranged, semi-erect to variously slanted away from branches, thickly succulent, glabrous, ± subsessile to shortly petiolate, flattened, above depressed along midrib, usually bright light green, hardly waxy; +petiole +± absent or +1–3 mm +long, green; +blade +18–20 × +15–20 mm +, orbicular to ± cordate, obovate to somewhat spatulate to slightly oblong, succulent; +base +rounded to slightly cordate; +apex +rounded-obtuse; +margins +somewhat entire to slightly crenulate to BRoadly dEnTaTE in UppER ½ To ⅔, REddish pURplE-infUsEd. +Inflorescence +a few- and laxly- [1–3(–5)-]flowered, compound, terminal, apically branched cyme, pendent; +peduncle +short, ± +5–15 mm +long, minutely tomentose, deep brownish red. +Flowers +13–20 mm +long, flimsy, pendent, urceolate to campanulate, finely pubescent, subtended by small bracts, bracts soon shed, waxy bloom absent, buds reddish purple; +pedicels +finely pubescent, +5–12 mm +long. +Calyx +consisting of 4 sepals; +sepals +6–9 mm +long, green to sparsely or strongly reddish purple-infused, basally fused for ± +1 mm +, free portion ovate to oblong, acute-tipped, somewhat cuspidate, slightly curved away from the corolla tube especially apically, very finely and sparsely pubescent. +Corolla tube +11–18 mm +long, reddish purple to reddish pink to red, light yellow basally at level of calyx at maturity, inside of corolla tube and lobes reddish purple strongly infused with yellow, urceolate to campanulate, flared at mouth, recurved lobes very slightly pubescent, waxy bloom absent. +Corolla lobes +3.5–5.0 × +5–6 mm +, reddish purple, strongly infused with yellow inside, ovate, apically somewhat obtuse-rounded to acute, with slight indentation, minutely apiculate. +Stamens +inserted very low down in corolla tube at ± lower end of carpels, 4 included, 4 slightly exserted; +filaments +14–18 mm +long, thin, light yellowish green strongly infused with purple; +anthers +± +1 mm +long, greyish black, hastate. +Pistil +consisting of 4 carpels; +carpels +7–9 mm +long, light shiny yellowish green; +styles +12– 15 mm +long; +stigmas +minutely capitate, whitish, included; +nectar scales +± linear-rectangular, free, 1.5–2.0 × 0.5–1.0 mm, white, purplish-infused along margins, round-tipped, but tooth-like indented above. +Follicles +7–9(–10) mm long, light green, eventually brittle, grass spikelet-like when dry, enveloped in dry, dull purplish brown remains of calyx and corolla, calyx and styles persistent for a long time, dull purplish brown for a long time and remaining so. +Seeds +small, +0.50–0.75 mm +long, light brown to reddish brown, rectangular-straight or banana-shaped-curved, slightly apiculate at one end, faintly longitudinally striated. +Chromosome number +: +x += 20 ( +Friedmann 1971: 104 +), 2 +n += 40 ( +Baldwin 1938: 576 +, +Friedmann 1971: 104 +) (see +Smith 2022: 158 +, 166, 168, 174 for a discussion of the cytotaxonomy of + +Kalanchoe uniflora + +and + +Kalanchoe +subg. +Alatae + +, the subgenus in which it is included). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/A4/66/36/A466361B5423FFFF6296FCF3FDABE03D.xml b/data/A4/66/36/A466361B5423FFFF6296FCF3FDABE03D.xml index a7b0c43933d..23ab7a13abf 100644 --- a/data/A4/66/36/A466361B5423FFFF6296FCF3FDABE03D.xml +++ b/data/A4/66/36/A466361B5423FFFF6296FCF3FDABE03D.xml @@ -1,55 +1,55 @@ - - - -Aphelandra almanegra (Acanthaceae), a new species from the dry forests of the Cauca River canyon in Antioquia department, Colombia + + + +Aphelandra almanegra (Acanthaceae), a new species from the dry forests of the Cauca River canyon in Antioquia department, Colombia - - -Author + + +Author -Gallego, Pablo C. -0009-0000-7868-5896 -Instituto de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Antioquia, A. A, 1226, Medellín, Colombia. -pablo.gallego@udea.edu.co +Gallego, Pablo C. +0009-0000-7868-5896 +Instituto de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Antioquia, A. A, 1226, Medellín, Colombia. +pablo.gallego@udea.edu.co - - -Author + + +Author -Wood, John R. I. -0000-0001-5102-3729 -Department of Biology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX 1 3 RB, United Kingdom. & Honorary Research Associate, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW 9 3 AB, United Kingdom. -jriwood@hotmail.com +Wood, John R. I. +0000-0001-5102-3729 +Department of Biology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX 1 3 RB, United Kingdom. & Honorary Research Associate, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW 9 3 AB, United Kingdom. +jriwood@hotmail.com -text - - -Phytotaxa +text + + +Phytotaxa - -2024 - -2024-06-07 + +2024 + +2024-06-07 - -652 + +652 - -3 + +3 - -208 -216 + +208 +216 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.652.3.2 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.652.3.2 -journal article -10.11646/phytotaxa.652.3.2 -1179-3163 -13216695 +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.652.3.2 +1179-3163 +13216695 @@ -72,27 +72,43 @@ P. Gallego, J.R.I. Wood & J.C. Franco + Type: — COLOMBIA . Antioquia -. Mun. Liborina: Vereda Chachafruto, Quebrada Canelón Blanco Alta, Predio Palo Hueco, -819 m +. +Mun. Liborina +: +Vereda Chachafruto +, +Quebrada Canelón Blanco Alta +, +Predio Palo Hueco +, + +819 m + , 6°42’8.19”N , 75°49’6.75”W , -1 March 2021 + +1 March 2021 + (fl & fr), -P -. Gallego et al. 1284 +P. Gallego +et al. 1284 ( holotype -: HUA-229338!) +: +HUA-229338 +!) + @@ -331,10 +347,9 @@ refers to the vernacular name given to this plant by the people living in the sp ) - + -Additional specimens examined -( +Additional specimens examined ( paratypes ): @@ -346,8 +361,7 @@ refers to the vernacular name given to this plant by the people living in the sp Mun. Briceño : Cañon del Río -Cauca -, +Cauca, Central Hidroeléctrica de Ituango , Chirí @@ -373,7 +387,7 @@ et al. 370 (JAUM-094019) ; - + Vereda la Calera , Quebrada Tablones @@ -398,7 +412,9 @@ et al. 370 Idarraga et al. 8441 -(JUAM-094000). +(JUAM-094000). + + Mun. Ituango : Hda. San Juan de Rodas @@ -422,7 +438,7 @@ et al. 8441 (MEDEL-25020) ; - + Villa Cauca , depósito de la vía industrial, @@ -444,7 +460,10 @@ et al. 8441 H . Salazar 4815 -(HUA-186881). Mun. Liborina: Cañón del río +(HUA-186881). + + +Mun. Liborina: Cañón del río Cauca , Central Hidroeléctrica de Ituango @@ -496,7 +515,7 @@ et al. 64 (MEDEL-64152) ; - + Km 4 of road Liborina-Sabanalarga @@ -523,7 +542,9 @@ et al. 64 Zarucchi et al. 7253 -(COL-363012, HUA-59508, MEXU-966277 [digital image], US-3148983 [digital image]). +(COL-363012, HUA-59508, MEXU-966277 [digital image], US-3148983 [digital image]). + + Mun. Olaya : Carretera @@ -548,7 +569,10 @@ que conduce al corregimiento C . Madrugo et al. 887 -(COL-514073, MEDEL-44752). Mun. Sabanalarga: Camino del pueblo hacia los llanos +(COL-514073, MEDEL-44752). + + +Mun. Sabanalarga: Camino del pueblo hacia los llanos de Niquía , @@ -575,7 +599,7 @@ que conduce al corregimiento 2030 (HUA-220066) ; - + Cañón del río Cauca @@ -607,7 +631,9 @@ et al. 377 ( JAUM -). +). + + Mun. Santa Fe de Antioquia @@ -812,7 +838,7 @@ the monograph by A. almanegra are set out in -Table 1 +Table 1 and Fig. 5 . @@ -888,10 +914,10 @@ long ( has been reported as bright pink to red by Wasshausen (1975: 99) , but all specimens we have been able to review have red corollas. ( -Table 1 +Table 1 ). - + TABLE 1. Comparative characters of @@ -964,7 +990,7 @@ and Leaf Shape/Size Elliptic; 6.0–34.4 × 3.2–14.7 cm -Ovate to oblong- elliptic; 8–20 × 3.5–10 cm +Ovate to oblong-elliptic; 8–20 × 3.5–10 cm Oblong-elliptic; up to 35 × 12.5 cm Oblong-elliptic to lanceolate; 8–13 × 2–4 cm Elliptic or narrowly obovate; (7)10–23 × (3)4–8 cm @@ -1024,7 +1050,7 @@ and ......continued on the next page - + TABLE 1. (Continued)