diff --git a/data/03/B9/87/03B98783FFD4FFAFFF26F8C1FDB8FB46.xml b/data/03/B9/87/03B98783FFD4FFAFFF26F8C1FDB8FB46.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f4339ec4be1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/B9/87/03B98783FFD4FFAFFF26F8C1FDB8FB46.xml @@ -0,0 +1,434 @@ + + + +Contribution to knowledge of the oribatid mite genus Oribatodes (Acari, Oribatida, Cepheusidae), with supplementary descriptions of two species and data on juvenile instars + + + +Author + +Ermilov, Sergey G. +Tyumen State University, Institute of Environmental and Agricultural Biology (X-BIO), Tyumen, Russia. + + + +Author + +Bayartogtokh, Badamdorj +Department of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-23 + + +5485 + + +1 + + +73 +91 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.8 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.8 +1175-5326 +13209663 +6B69EC91-47FA-4569-B4FD-119FC9010BD2 + + + + + + + +Oribatodes reticulatus +( +Sitnikova, 1979 +) + + + + + + + +( +Figs 7–12 +) + + + + +Material. + +Eleven adults +and one deutonymph: +Panama +, +Chiriqui Province +, +Finca Lenida +, near +Boquete Casita Alta +, ca. + +690 m + +elev., debris in damp ravine, + +17.III.1959 + +(leg. +H.S. Dybas +). +As +“ + +Oribatodes + +? sp.” in the personal collection of +Roy A. Norton + +. + + + +The material (adults and deutonymph) is deposited in the collection of the +Tyumen State +University Museum of Zoology +, +Tyumen +, +Russia +. All specimens are preserved in 70% solution of ethanol with a drop of glycerol + +. + + +Main morphological traits. +Adult +. Body length: 630–690. Rostrum rounded. Prolamella present, pair fused anteriorly. Rostral and lamellar setae setiform, with short flagellate tip, barbed; interlamellar seta setiform, barbed; bothridial seta with long stalk and short, slightly developed head having barbs and short ciliae. Notogastral foveolae rounded. Notogastral setae medium-sized, setiform, barbed. Pedotectum I with small tubercles (not foveolate). Leg trochanters III and IV with tooth dorsoanteriorly. + + + +FIGURE 7. + +Oribatodes reticulatus +( +Sitnikova, 1979 +) + +, adult (gnathosoma and legs not shown): A—dorsal view; B—anterior part of prodorsum, anterodorsal view; C—ventral view; D—right lateral view; E—posterior view. Scale bars 100 μm (A, C–E), 50 μm (B). + + + + +FIGURE 8. + +Oribatodes reticulatus +( +Sitnikova, 1979 +) + +, adult: A—subcapitulum, ventral view; B—palp, right, antiaxial view; C—chelicera, left, paraxial view; D—leg I, right, antiaxial view; E—leg II, right, antiaxial view; F—leg III, left, antiaxial view; G—leg IV, left, antiaxial view. Scale bars 50 μm (D–G), 20 μm (A–C). + + + + +FIGURE 9. + +Oribatodes reticulatus +( +Sitnikova, 1979 +) + +, deutonymph (some gastronotic setae broken): A—dorsal view; B— ventral view; C— right lateral view. Scale bar 100 μm. + + + +Supplementary description of adult. +Measurements +. Body length: 630–690; notogastral width: 495–540. Gender not identified. + + +Integument +( +Figs 7A–E +; +11A–D +; +12A, B +). Body color brown to dark brown. Body and legs covered by thick layer of gel-like cerotegument with microgranulate inclusions. Surface microgranulate sculpturing; notogaster with large rounded foveolae forming typical foveolate-reticulate ornamentation; prodorsum (except rostrum and basal part), lamella, lateral part of epimere I with medium-sized foveolae; pedotectum I with small tubercles (not foveolate); lateral part of body between notogaster and acetabula II, III densely tuberculate; anogenital region with ridges and depressions. + + +Prodorsum +( +Figs 7A, B, D +; +11A, C +; +12A, B +). Rostrum rounded, with thin convex carina connecting insertions of rostral setae. Lamellar cusp with small lateral tooth. Translamella absent. Prolamella simple, pair fused anteriorly. Interlamellar region with longitudinal, elongate triangular ridge. Tutorium ridge-like, heavily spinose dorsally. Rostral (82–90) and lamellar (123–150) setae setiform, with short flagellate tip, barbed; interlamellar seta (60–67) setiform, barbed; bothridial seta (112–123) with long stalk and short, slightly developed head having barbs and short ciliae; exobothridial seta not observable. + + + +FIGURE 10. + +Oribatodes reticulatus +( +Sitnikova, 1979 +) + +, deutonymph: A—leg I, right, antiaxial view; B—leg II (tarsus not shown), right, antiaxial view; C—leg III (tarsus not shown), left, antiaxial view; D—leg IV, left, antiaxial view. Scale bar 50 μm. + + + +Notogaster +( +Figs 7A, D, E +; +11A, C, D +; +12A +). Humeral process well defined. All notogastral setae ( +c +, +la +, +lm +, +lp +, +h +2 +, +h +3 +: 60–67; +h +1 +, +p +1 +, +p +2 +, +p +3 +: 41–52) setiform, barbed. Opisthonotal gland opening and all lyrifissures distinct (except +ia +not observable in dorsal view). + + + +Gnathosoma + +( +Figs 8A–C +; +11B +). Subcapitulum size: 142–150 × 105–120; subcapitular setae ( +a +, +h +: 26–30; +m +: 19) setiform, roughened; both adoral setae (9–11) setiform, smooth. Palp length: 82–86; postpalpal seta (11) spiniform, smooth. Chelicera length: 142–150; setae ( +cha +: 41–43; +chb +: 22–26) setiform, barbed. + + +Epimeral and podosomal regions +( +Figs 7C,D +; +11B,C +).All epimeral setae ( +3c +, +4c +:34–41; +1b +, +3b +, +4a +, +4b +: 19–26; +1a +, +1c +, +2a +, +3a +: 11) setiform, roughened. Discidium elongate triangular, rounded distally. Circumpedal carina originating near posterior margin of acetabulum IV, then curving to approach circumgastric scissure asymptotically. + + +Anogenital region +( +Figs 7C–E +; +11B +). Genital, aggenital, anal, and adanal setae (22–26) setae setiform, roughened. Adanal lyrifissure distinct. + + +Legs +( +Figs 8D–G +; +11B, C +; +12A +). Claw of each leg strong, slightly barbed on dorsal side. Trochanters III and IV with long tooth-like process dorsoanteriorly. Dorsoparaxial porose area on femora I–IV and on trochanters III, IV well visible. Formulas of leg setation and solenidia: I (1-5-3-4-20) [1-2-2], II (1-4-3-4-16) [1-1-2], III (2-3-2-3- 15) [1-1-0], IV (1-2-3-3-12) [0-1-0]; homology of setae and solenidia indicated in +Table 1 +. Famulus short, slightly swollen and blunt distally, located posterior to solenidia ω +1 +and ω +2 +; seta +ft” +specifically bent in the middle; seta +s +eupathidial; solenidion φ +1 +on tibia I long, subflagellate versus other solenidia short or medium-sized, rod-like or slightly bacilliform. + + + + +FIGURE 11. + +Oribatodes reticulatus +( +Sitnikova, 1979 +) + +, adult, SEM micrographs (cerotegument partially removed): A—dorsal view; B—ventral view; C—right lateral view; D—notogastral seta +lp +. + + + + +Description of deutonymph. +Measurements +. Total length: 435; total width: 315. + + +Integument +( +Figs 9A–C +). Body colorless with a yellowish tint. Body surface indistinctly porose covering by gel-like cerotegument with bacillar and tuberculate inclusions. + + +Prodorsum +( +Figs 9A, C +). About 1/2 of gastronotic region (in lateral aspect). Rostrum rounded. Rostral (64) and lamellar setae setiform, barbed, inserted on tubercles; interlamellar seta (7) spiniform, smooth, located on tubercle; bothridial seta (150) setiform, with flagellate tip, barbed; exobothridial seta (37) setiform, slightly barbed. + + +Gastronotic region +( +Figs 9A, C +). Exuvial scalps not found. Gastronotic setae +c +1 +, +c +3 +, +la +, +lm +, +lp +, +h +1 +, +h +2 +, +h +3 +very long (more 400), subflagellate, barbed, often broken; +c +2 +(37), +p +1 +(94), +p +2 +(79), +p +3 +(56) setiform, barbed; all setae except +p +2 +, +p +3 +inserted on large trapezoid apophyses. Opisthonotal gland opening and all cupules distinct in transmitted light. + + + +Gnathosoma + +( +Fig. 9B +). Similar to that to adult. + + + +FIGURE 12. + +Oribatodes reticulatus +( +Sitnikova, 1979 +) + +, adult, SEM micrographs (cerotegument partially removed): A— anterodorsal view; B—bothridium, interlamellar and bothridial setae, basal parts of lamella and tutorium, from right lateral view. + + + +Epimeral region +( +Figs 9B, C +). Epimeral setal formula: 3-1-2-2; all setae (17–22) setiform, slightly barbed. + + +Anogenital region +( +Figs 9B, C +). Genital, aggenital and adanal setae (17–22) setiform, slightly barbed. Adanal cupule distinct; anal cupule not observable. + + +Legs +( +Figs 10A–D +). Claw of each leg strong, slightly barbed on dorsal side. Formulas of leg setation and solenidia: I (0-4-3-4-16) [1-2-2], II (0-4-3-4-13) [1-1-2], III (1-3-2-3-13) [1-1-0], IV (0-2-2-2 -12) [0-1-0]; homology of setae and solenidia indicated in +Table 1 +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/B9/87/03B98783FFDDFFA3FF26F902FB12FCA4.xml b/data/03/B9/87/03B98783FFDDFFA3FF26F902FB12FCA4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fa65eec7107 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/B9/87/03B98783FFDDFFA3FF26F902FB12FCA4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + +Contribution to knowledge of the oribatid mite genus Oribatodes (Acari, Oribatida, Cepheusidae), with supplementary descriptions of two species and data on juvenile instars + + + +Author + +Ermilov, Sergey G. +Tyumen State University, Institute of Environmental and Agricultural Biology (X-BIO), Tyumen, Russia. + + + +Author + +Bayartogtokh, Badamdorj +Department of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-23 + + +5485 + + +1 + + +73 +91 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.8 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.8 +1175-5326 +13209663 +6B69EC91-47FA-4569-B4FD-119FC9010BD2 + + + + + + +Genus + +Oribatodes +Banks, 1895 + + + + + + + + +Type +species: + +Oribatodes mirabilis +Banks, 1895 + + + + +Generic diagnosis. +Adult +. With character states of +Cepheusidae +(e.g., +Sitnikova 1975 +; +Bernini & Bernini 1990 +; +Weigmann 2006 +; +Norton & Behan-Pelletier 2009 +). +Body size +: Medium-sized to large (length about 400–1000). +Integument +: Body and legs covered by layer of gel-like cerotegument, sometimes with bacillar, granulate and tuberculate inclusions. Prodorsum usually foveolate; notogaster without heavy sculpturing, but with simple foveolae which often forming reticulate or polygonate ornamentation; anogenital region with ridges, depressions and foveolae. +Prodorsum +: Rostrum rounded or narrowly triangular. Lamella broad, distinctly not reaching rostrum, with short cusp having lateral tooth. Translamella absent. Prolamella present or absent. Tutorium present, ridge-like. Rostral and lamellar setae medium-sized/long, setiform, with or without flagellate tip; interlamellar seta medium-sized/long, setiform/robust; bothridial seta with long stalk and slightly developed, barbed and/or shortly ciliate head; exobothridial seta absent. Interbothridial and postbothridial tubercles absent. Dorsosejugal porose area, dorsophragma and pleurophragma absent. +Notogaster +: Anterior notogastral margin well developed, distinctly convex medially, rarely straight. Humeral region with short tubercle-like process. Pteromorph and octotaxic system absent. Ten pairs of notogastral setae (centrodorsal part of notogaster without setae) short/medium-sized/long, mostly setiform, but sometimes some setae bacilliform or slightly phylliform. + +Gnathosoma + +. Subcapitulum diarthric. All subcapitular setae setiform. Palp with setation: 0-2-1-3-9(+ω); solenidion bacilliform, coupled with eupathidium mediodistally. Axillary saccule absent. Chelicera chelate-dentate, with two setae. +Epimeral and lateral podosomal regions +: Epimeral setal formula: 3-1-3-3; epimeral setae comparatively short, setiform. Pedotectum I represented by large scale, pedotectum II represented by small scale. Humeral porose area not observed. Discidium and circumpedal carina present. +Anogenital region +: Six pairs of genital, one pair of aggenital, two pairs of anal, and three pairs of adanal setae comparatively short, setiform. Marginal porose area absent. Adanal lyrifissure distanced from anal plate. +Legs +: All legs monodactylous. Porose areas present on all femora and on trochanters III, IV. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/B9/87/03B98783FFDEFFA9FF26FC8EFA89F953.xml b/data/03/B9/87/03B98783FFDEFFA9FF26FC8EFA89F953.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..761e07df647 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/B9/87/03B98783FFDEFFA9FF26FC8EFA89F953.xml @@ -0,0 +1,986 @@ + + + +Contribution to knowledge of the oribatid mite genus Oribatodes (Acari, Oribatida, Cepheusidae), with supplementary descriptions of two species and data on juvenile instars + + + +Author + +Ermilov, Sergey G. +Tyumen State University, Institute of Environmental and Agricultural Biology (X-BIO), Tyumen, Russia. + + + +Author + +Bayartogtokh, Badamdorj +Department of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-23 + + +5485 + + +1 + + +73 +91 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.8 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.8 +1175-5326 +13209663 +6B69EC91-47FA-4569-B4FD-119FC9010BD2 + + + + + + + +Oribatodes mirabilis +Banks, 1895 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 1–6 +) + + + + +Material. + +Nine adults +and four nymphs (one deutonymph, three tritonymphs): +USA +, +New York +, +Onondaga Co. +, +Cicero Game Management Area +, +43º08.869'N +, +76º02.873'W +, sphagnum moss in bog, + +15.X.1994 + +(leg. +R +. +A. Norton +) + +. + +Five adults +: +USA +, +Wisconsin +, +Kenosha Co. +, +Salem +, +Silver Lake +, sphagnum moss in bog, + +23.XI.1978 + +(leg. +W. Suter +). +Adults +were compared indirectly with the +type +specimen of +Nathan Banks +(they were compared with specimens that had been previously compared directly to the +type +; pers. com. +Roy A. Norton +) + +. + + + +The material (adults and juvenile instars) is deposited in the collection of the +Tyumen State +University Museum of Zoology +, +Tyumen +, +Russia +. All specimens are preserved in 70% solution of ethanol with a drop of glycerol + +. + + +Main morphological traits. +Adult +. Body length: 630–750. Rostrum narrowly triangular. Prolamella present, pair directed anteriorly, separated and close to each other. Rostral and lamellar setae setiform, with short flagellate tip, barbed; interlamellar seta robust, barbed; bothridial seta with long stalk and short, slightly developed head having barbs and short ciliae. Notogastral foveolae rounded, oval or polygonate. Notogastral setae +c +, +la +, +lm +, +lp +, +h +2 +, +h +3 +, +p +2 +, +p +3 +setiform, barbed ( +h +2 +, +h +3 +˃ +lp +˃ +c +, +la +, +lm +˃ +p +2 +˃ +p +3 +); +h +1 +, +p +1 +bacilliform, heavily barbed; dorsal setae inserted on two longitudinal carinae. Leg trochanters III and IV with tooth dorsoanteriorly. + + +Supplementary description of adult. +Measurements +. Body length: 630–750; notogastral width: 450–585. Sex not identified. + + +Integument +( +Figs 1A–E +; +5A–D +; +6A, B +). Body color brown to dark brown. Body and legs covered by thick layer of gel-like cerotegument with bacillar and microgranulate inclusions. Surface microgranulate sculpturing; notogaster with large rounded, oval or polygonal foveolae forming typical foveolate-reticulate ornamentation; prodorsum (except rostrum and basal part), lamella, pedotectum I, lateral part of epimere I with medium-sized foveolae; lateral part of body between notogaster and acetabula II, III densely tuberculate; anogenital region with ridges and depressions. + + +Prodorsum +( +Figs 1A, B, D +; +5A, C +; +6A, B +). Rostrum narrowly triangular. Lamellar cusp with small lateral tooth. Translamella absent. Prolamella simple, pair directed anteriorly, separated and close to each other. Transverse convex ridge located between rostral region and prolamellae. Tutorium ridge-like, heavily spinose dorsally. Rostral (67–79) and lamellar (90–101) setae setiform, with short flagellate tip, barbed; interlamellar seta (97–101) robust, barbed; bothridial seta (94–101) with long stalk and short, slightly developed head having barbs and short ciliae; exobothridial seta not observable. + + +Notogaster +( +Figs 1A, D, E +; +5A, C, D +; +6A, B +). Humeral process well defined. One pair of longitudinal carinae beginning from anterior notogastral margin and stretches along the insertions of dorsal setae (well developed between +c +and +la +; poorly observed between +la +and +h +2 +). Notogastral setae ( +c +, +la +, +lm +: 60–75; +lp +: 101–112; +h +2 +, +h +3 +: 131–139; +p +2 +: 56–64; +p +3 +: 49–56) setiform, barbed; +h +1 +(37–41) and +p +1 +(49–52) bacilliform, heavily barbed. Opisthonotal gland opening and all lyrifissures distinct (except +ia +not observable in dorsal view). + + + +Gnathosoma + +( +Figs 1A, D +; +5B +). Similar to + +O. reticulatus + +. Subcapitulum size: 131–135 × 97–101; subcapitular setae ( +a +: 32–37; +m +: 19–22; +h +: 28–30) setiform, roughened; both adoral setae (9) setiform, smooth. Palp length: 82–86; postpalpal seta (9) spiniform, smooth. Chelicera length: 131–135; setae ( +cha +: 37–41; +chb +: 22–24) setiform, barbed. + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Oribatodes mirabilis +Banks, 1895 + +, adult (gnathosoma and legs not shown): A—dorsal view; B—anterior part of prodorsum, anterodorsal view; C—ventral view; D—right lateral view; E—posterior view. Scale bars 100 μm (A, C–E), 50 μm (B). + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Oribatodes mirabilis +Banks, 1895 + +, tritonymph (some gastronotic setae broken. Scale bar 100 μm. + + + + +FIGURE 3. + +Oribatodes mirabilis +Banks, 1895 + +, juvenile instars: A—epimeral and anogenital region of deutonymph, ventral view; B—epimeral and anogenital region of tritonymph, ventral view. Scale bar 100 μm. + + + +Epimeral and podosomal regions +( +Figs 1C, D +; +5B, C +). All epimeral setae ( +3c +, +4c +: 41–45; +1b +, +3b +, +4a +: 26–30; +4b +: 22–26; +1c +: 19–22; +1a +, +2a +, +3a +: 15–19) setiform, roughened. Discidium elongate triangular, rounded distally. Circumpedal carina originating near posterior margin of acetabulum IV, then curving to approach circumgastric scissure asymptotically. + + +Anogenital region +( +Figs 1C–E +; +5B +). Genital (26–34), aggenital (22–26), anal (19–26), and adanal (22–26) setae setiform, roughened. Adanal lyrifissure distinct. + + +Legs +( +Figs 5B, C +; +6A +). Generally, similar to + +O. reticulatus + +. + + + + +Description of deuto- and tritonymphs. +Measurements +. Total length: 465 (deutonymph), 570–615 (tritonymphs); total width: 345 (deutonymph), 435–450 (tritonymphs). + + +Integument +( +Figs 2 +, +3A, B +). Body colorless with a yellowish tint. Body surface indistinctly porose covering by gel-like cerotegument with bacillar and tuberculate inclusions. Exuvial scalps foveolate. + + +Prodorsum +( +Fig. 2 +). About 1/3 of gastronotic region (in lateral aspect). Rostrum rounded. Rostral seta ( +Dn +: 67; +Tn +: 64–75) setiform, barbed, inserted on tubercle; lamellar seta ( +Dn +: more than 140; +Tn +: more than 170) subflagellate, barbed, inserted on tubercle; interlamellar seta ( +Dn +, +Tn +: 6) spiniform, smooth, located on tubercle; bothridial seta ( +Dn +: more than 140; +Tn +: more than 170) subflagellate, barbed; exobothridial seta ( +Dn +: 37; +Tn +: 41–52) setiform, slightly barbed. + + + +FIGURE 4. + +Oribatodes mirabilis +Banks, 1895 + +, tritonymph: A—leg I, right, antiaxial view; B—leg II (tarsus not shown), right, antiaxial view; C—leg III (tarsus not shown), left, antiaxial view; D—leg IV, left, antiaxial view. Scale bar 50 μm. + + + + +FIGURE 5. + +Oribatodes mirabilis +Banks, 1895 + +, adult, SEM micrographs (cerotegument partially removed): A—dorsal view; B—ventral view; C—right lateral view; D—notogastral seta +h +3 +. + + + + +FIGURE 6. + +Oribatodes mirabilis +Banks, 1895 + +, adult, SEM micrographs (cerotegument partially removed): A—anterodorsal view; B—humeral process of notogaster, bothridium, interlamellar and bothridial setae, basal parts of lamella, tutorium and pedotectum I, from right lateral view. + + + +Gastronotic region +( +Figs 2 +, +3A, B +). Exuvial scalps found in all nymphs, with nine or ten pairs of setae ( +c +1 +, +c +2 +, +da +, +dm +, +dp +, +la +, +lm +, +lp +, +h + +2 +in + +La +, +Pn +; +c +1 +, +c +2 +, +c +3 +, +la +, +lm +, +lp +, +h +1 +, +h +2 +, +h +3 +, +p + +1 +in + +Dn +, +Tn +); all setae of larval scalp setiform, setae of protonymphal scalp setiform, with short flagellate tip (except simple +c +1 +, +c +2 +), setae of deutonymphal scalp subflagellate (except setiform +c +2 +). Gastronotic setae +c +1 +, +c +3 +, +la +, +lm +, +lp +, +h +1 +, +h +2 +, +h +3 +p +1 +very long (more than +200 in +Dn +, more than +300 in +Tn +), flagellate, barbed, often broken; +p +2 +( +Dn +: 150; +Tn +: 205), +p +3 +( +Dn +: 82; +Tn +: 157–165) setiform, with short flagellate tip; +c +2 +( +Dn +: 150; +Tn +: 169–184) setiform, barbed; all setae except +p +2 +, +p +3 +inserted on large trapezoid apophyses. Opisthonotal gland opening and all cupules distinct in transmitted light. + + + +Gnathosoma + +. Similar to that of adult. + + +Epimeral region +( +Figs 3A, B +). Epimeral setal formula: +Dn +: 3-1-2-2; +Tn +: 3-1-3-3; all setae in +Dn +( +1a +, +1c +, +2a +, +3a +: 17–19; others: 26–30) and +Tn +( +1a +, +1c +, +2a +, +3a +: 19–22; +1b +, +3b +: 41–45; others: 30–34) setiform, slightly barbed. + + +Anogenital region +( +Figs 3A, B +). Genital ( +Dn +: 26; +Tn +: 34–37), aggenital ( +Dn +: 26; +Tn +: 34–37), anal ( +Tn +: 26–30), and adanal ( +Dn +: 26; +Tn +: 34–37) setae setiform, slightly barbed. Adanal cupule distinct; anal cupule not observable. + + +Legs +( +Figs 4A–D +). Claw of each leg strong, slightly barbed on dorsal side. Formulas of leg setation and solenidia: +Dn +: I (0-4-3-4-16) [1-2-2], II (0-4-3-4-13) [1-1-2], III (1-3-2-3-13) [1-1-0], IV (0-2-2-2-12) [0-1-0]; +Tn +: I (1-4-4-5-18) [1-2-2], II (1-4-4-5-15) [1-1-2], III (2-3-3-4-15) [1-1-0], IV (1-2-3-4-12) [0-1-0]; homology of setae and solenidia indicated in +Table 1 +. + + + +TABLE 1. +Development of leg setation of + +Oribatodes mirabilis +Banks, 1895 + +and + +O. reticulatus +( +Sitnikova, 1979 +) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Tr + +Fe + +Ge + +Ti + +Ta +
Leg I
+Dn + +- + +d, (l), bv” + +(l), d +σ + +(l), v’, d +φ1, φ2 + +(ft), (tc), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv), (pl), +ɛ, ω1, ω2 +
+Tn* + +v’ + +d, (l), bv” + +(l), v’, d +σ + +(l), (v), d +φ1, φ2 + +(ft), (tc), (it), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv), (pl), +ɛ, ω1, ω2 +
+Ad + +v’ + +d, (l), bv”, v” + +(l) +, +v’, +σ + +(l), (v), +φ1, φ2 + +(ft), (tc), (it), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv), (pl), l”, v’, +ɛ, ω 1, ω 2 +
Leg II
+Dn + +- + +d, (l), bv” + +(l), d +σ + +(l), v’, d +φ + +(ft), (tc), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv), +ω1, ω2 +
+Tn* + +v’ + +d, (l), bv” + +(l), v’, d +σ + +(l), (v), d +φ + +(ft), (tc), (it), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv), +ω1, ω2 +
+Ad + +v’ + +d, (l), bv” + +(l) +, +v’, +σ + +(l), (v), +φ + +(ft), (tc), (it), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv), l”, +ω 1, ω 2 +
Leg III
+Dn + +v’ + +d, l’, ev’ + +l’, d +σ + +l’, v’, d +φ + +(ft), (tc), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv) +
+Tn* + +l’, v’ + +d, l’, ev’ + +l’, v’, d +σ + +l’, (v), d +φ + +(ft), (tc), (it), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv) +
+Ad + +l’, v’ + +d, l’, ev’ + +l’, v’, +σ + +l’, (v), +φ + +(ft), (tc), (it), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv) +
Leg IV
+Dn + +- + +d, ev’ + +d, l’ + +v’, d +φ + +ft”, (tc), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv) +
+Tn* + +v’ + +d, ev’ + +d, l’, v’ + +l’, (v), d +φ + +ft”, (tc), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv) +
+Ad + +v’ + +d, ev’ + +d, l’, v’ + +l’, (v), +φ +ft”, (tc), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv)
+ + +Note: Roman letters refer to normal setae, Greek letters refer to solenidia (except ɛ—famulus), +d +φ and +d +σ— seta and solenidion coupled. One apostrophe ( +’ +) marks setae on anterior and double apostrophe ( +” +) setae on posterior side of the given leg segment. Parentheses refer to a pair of setae. +* +—Leg setation in tritonymph of + +O. reticulatus + +unknown. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887B3FFFC43622ADE951AFCE5E6C1.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887B3FFFC43622ADE951AFCE5E6C1.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ad2d1195bd4 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887B3FFFC43622ADE951AFCE5E6C1.xml @@ -0,0 +1,427 @@ + + + +A new species of Angursa (Tardigrada, Heterotardigrada) from the White Sea, North Russia + + + +Author + +Tchesunov, Alexei V. +Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov’s Moscow University, 119234 Moscow, Russia + + + +Author + +Fedyaeva, Maria A. +N. A. Pertsov White Sea Biological Station, Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov’s Moscow University, 119234 Moscow, Russia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +121 +128 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.5 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.5 +1175-5326 +0B69BD10-AB31-456F-98E0-3073787C5DB6 + + + + + + + +Angursa olenevskii + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +Figs 1–3 +, +Table 1 + + + + +Diagnosis + + + +Angursa + +with ballon-shaped primary clava inserted on pedestal together with cirrus A; cirrus A two to three times longer than primary clava; secondary and tertiary clavae not evident; cirrus E simple, tapered to the end; legs I–III with equal setose sensory organs on coxae; external digits with fine peduncle along their length and attached to the claw. + + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Angursa olenevskii + +sp. n. +, heads. +A +holotype female, dorsal view. +B +paratype 1, female, ventral view. The continuous punctations of the cuticle is shown just as a band. Scale bars 10 μm. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Angursa olenevskii + +sp. n. +, details. +A +paratype 2, female, entire. +B +paratype 1, female 1, hind body ventrally. +C +holotype female, left leg IV, dorsal view. The continuous punctations of the cuticle is shown just as a band. Scale bars: A 20 μm, B and C 10 μm. + + + + +Etymology + +The species name refers to the Olenevski Island where the new tardigrade was found. + + + +Type material + + + +Holotype +(female) and +three paratypes +in permanent glycerine slide each are deposited in collection M. +V +. +Lomonosov +Moscow State +University Zoological Museum +, +Moscow +, +Russia +under inventory numbers + +: + +Holotype +, female— 1 +ZMMU +R-2 + +, + +Paratype +1, female—2 +ZMMU +R-3 + +, + +Paratype +2, gender unknown—2 +ZMMU +R-4 + +, + +Paratype +3, female—4 +ZMMU +R-5 + +. + + +Type locality + + +White Sea, Kandalaksha Bay, Karelian coast, Olenevski Island, +66°52’N +and +33°11’E +, intertidal sandy littoral, medium sand, +10–15 cm +sediment depth. +August 2021 +. + + + + +Description + +Body elongate, cylindrical, its length to width ratio 3.6–4.5. Body cuticle smooth, without sculpture and surface differentiations, but looking indistinctly punctated because of dense intracuticular pillars. + +Cephalic region provided with complete set of appendages. All the appendages, except cA and primary clavae consist of two parts with indistinct borders, a high slim basal truncate cone (scapus) and a distal acute cirrus. The basal cones and pedestals rise up smoothly from the body surface. Internal cirri situated a bit dorsally and a bit more close to one another than the external cirri. Cirrus A and primary clava inserted together on the stout truncate conical pedestal, the clava just posterior and ventral to the cirrus A. The primary clava generally balloon-shaped. Cirrus A exceeds the clava two to three times in length (fig. 1 A, B; 3 G). Secondary and tertiary clavae not visible in light nor in scanning electron microscope. There is a pair of small, slightly pigmented bodies (ocelli) situated interiorly just posterior to the cirrus A+clava pedestals (fig. 1 A); the ocelli distinctly visible but in only +holotype +female. Cirri E situated dorso-laterally close to posterior margin of the body and consist also of basal truncate conical pedestal and long pointed flagellar cirrus without annulation (fig. 2 A, C). + + + +TABLE 1. +Morphometrics of + +Angursa olenevskii + +type specimens (μm) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Character + +Holotype, female + +Paratype 1, female + +Paratype 2, gender unknown + +Paratype 3, female +
+Position to observer +dorsalventrallateralventral
+Body length +158131107157
+Body width between II and III leg pairs +38313035
+Median cirrus +?58.1?
+Internal cirrus +117.89.811
+External cirrus +89.88.18
+Cirrus A +2113.42121
+Primary clava +9.56.879.5
+Cirrus E +312127.231
+Sense organ of leg I +7.86?7.8
+Sense organ of leg II +7.27.97.97.2
+Sense organ of leg III +11.39.39.411.3
+Sense organ of leg IV +6.55.65.56.5
+Claw of leg I +22.42.72
+Claw of leg II +2.62.42.72.6
+Claw of leg I +2.62.43.72.6
+Claw of leg I +2.92.83.82.9
+Bulb length +16?1419
+Bulb width +14131115
+ +Each limb bears a sensory organ located dorsally on coxa (basal part) of the leg. Sensory organs of the legs I–III appear as simple spines equal in shape and size (fig. 2 A, 3 C). Leg IV sensory organ shaped as short ovoid to hemispherical papilla with a minute apical spine and without a cuticular sheath (fig. 2 A). + + +FIGURE 3. + +Angursa olenevskii + +sp. n. +, SEM. +A +specimen 1 male, entire, ventral view. +B +specimen 2 female, entire, lateroventral view. +C +specimen 3, entire, lateral view. +D +specimen 1, left foot I, ventral view. +E +specimen I, right foot II, toes with claws withdrawn in hoods. +F +specimen 4, left foot IV, toes with claws protruded. +G +specimen 3, primary clava and cirrus A. +H +specimen 1, male gonopore and anus. Scale bars: A 10 μm, B and C 20 μm, D–F, H 2 μm, G 5 μm. + + +Limbs conical, with barely discernible coxa and femur, and retractable distal part, tibia and tarsus with four digits terminating with claws. Digits unequal in length, laterally flattened and transparent. Internal digits slightly to significantly longer (1.3–1.5 times) than the external digits. External digits have a long peduncle extended along the ventral edge to the claw while internal digits do not have peduncle. Internal digits proximally differentiated in proximal pads while the external digits are not (fig. 2 C, 3 D). Claws minute, equal in shape and size, crescent-like in overall appearance. Primary point and secondary point broadly collocated; accessory point present on all claws but clearly discernible in only scanning electron and not in optical microscope (fig. 3 F). Claws may be projected or withdrawn into a fine transparent hood-like claw sheath. External and internal claws of all leg pairs equal in size. +Mouth opening subterminal. Stylets short and straight. Muscular bulb ovoid, its length to width ratio 1.14–1.25. Stylets short and straight, 10–16 μm long. Midgut pale brownish. No anal papillae. +Female gonopore a small six-lobed rosette at a short distance anterior to the longitudinal anal slit (fig. 2 B). Spermathecas and ducts poorly discernible. Male gonopore an arcuate transversal slit at anterior edge of a round areole just anterior to the longitudinal anal slit (fig. 3 H). + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887B3FFFF43662ADE9363FEDBE6ED.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887B3FFFF43662ADE9363FEDBE6ED.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..df3f9287c4b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887B3FFFF43662ADE9363FEDBE6ED.xml @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + +A new species of Angursa (Tardigrada, Heterotardigrada) from the White Sea, North Russia + + + +Author + +Tchesunov, Alexei V. +Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov’s Moscow University, 119234 Moscow, Russia + + + +Author + +Fedyaeva, Maria A. +N. A. Pertsov White Sea Biological Station, Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov’s Moscow University, 119234 Moscow, Russia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +121 +128 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.5 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.5 +1175-5326 +0B69BD10-AB31-456F-98E0-3073787C5DB6 + + + + + + +Genus + +Angursa +Pollock, 1979 + + + + + + + + +Diagnosis (after +Fujimoto & Hansen 2019 +, emended) + + + +Styraconyxidae +with slender body; median cirrus present; papillate primary clavae; flat secondary and tertiary present or indistinct; leg I sensory organs present; leg II and III sensory organs lacking, vestigial or well developed; leg IV sensory organs papillate; cirri E near caudal margin of body; each digit terminates in claw with two divergent points; peduncles present at base of external digits; seminal receptacles present; terminal positioned anus occasionally with anal papillae. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/CF/F9/03CFF948FF842B5D8B8375A0FD9E3FBE.xml b/data/03/CF/F9/03CFF948FF842B5D8B8375A0FD9E3FBE.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a7e4e865d65 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/CF/F9/03CFF948FF842B5D8B8375A0FD9E3FBE.xml @@ -0,0 +1,338 @@ + + + +Jasmineira filatovae Levenstein, 1961, the deepest known sabellid is a Potamethus Chamberlin, 1919: redescription, new combination and generic emendation + + + +Author + +Tovar-Hernandez, Maria Ana +Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Biosistemática, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Av. Pedro de Alba esq. Manuel L. Barragán, San Nicolás de los Garza, 66455, Nuevo León, México + + + +Author + +Jirkov, Igor A. +Department of General Ecology and Hydrobiology, Biological Faculty, Leninskiye Gory, 1, building 12, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119234, Russia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +48 +70 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.2 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.2 +1175-5326 +13209689 +46D2A955-0566-4711-A099-2C6947487E18 + + + + + + + +Potamethus filatovae +( +Levenstein, 1961 +) + +, +new combination + + + + + + +Figures 1–5 + + + + + + +Jasmineira filatovae +Levenstein, 1961 + +, 173, fig. 10.— + +Hartman, 1965a: 77 + +(catalogue).— + +Levenstein, 1966: 75–76 + +.— + +Levenstein, 1969: 60 + +(table).— + +Levenstein, 1973: 132 + +(table).— + +Capa & Murray, 2015: 124 + +(table).— + +Alalykina, 2020: 200 + +(table).— + +Capa +et al. +2021 + +: supplementary file (catalogue). + + + + + +Potamethus filatovae + +— + +Belyaev, 1989: 181 + +(table). + + + + + + +Type +material + + + +[ + +Shirshov Institute of Oceanology] +Bering Sea +, +R +/ +V +Vitjaz +, St. 618, + +25/9/1950 + +, + +3940 m + +, +57°30’N +, +168°30 ‘E +( +lectotype +INV0003597 and +7 paralectotypes +INV0001520, 3 of them with intact branchiae) and +R +/ +V +Vityaz, St. 539, + +25/8/1950 + +, + +3812 m + +, +58°39’N +, +177°43‘E +( +8 paralectotypes +INV0001521). Bottom temperature 1.56°C and 1.62°C, respectively; bottom salinity 34.60‰ and 34.71‰, respectively; sediment composed of fine silt and claydiatom silt, respectively + +. + + + + +Redescription +(based on +lectotype +, with variation of +paralectotypes +in brackets). + + +Body slightly flattened dorso-ventrally. Body length excluding crown 66 (15–85) mm, +3 mm +wide. Radiolar crown 24 (15–65) mm long. Crown composed of semi-circular radiolar lobes fused dorsally. Twelve (8–25) pairs of radioles not fused by an inter-radiolar membrane, not arranged into a spiral, without eyes or flanges. Radiolar tips entire, filiform ( +Fig. 1G +). Marginal base of crown with parallel lamellae bordering ventrally ( +Figs 1B +, +2D, E +). Anterior and posterior peristomial rings distinctly elongated ( +Figs 1C +, +2A, B +). Posterior peristomial ring, commonly known as collar, not covering radiolar bases ( +Figs 1C +, +2D +). Mid-ventral margin of collar incised, forming two rounded lappets ( +Figs 1B +, +2E +) as long as chaetiger 1. Ventral sacs rounded, exposed outside radiolar crown ( +Figs 1B +, +2E +). Lateral collar margin oblique ( +Figs 1C +, +2A +), elongate toward ventral side, exposing anterior peristomial ring ( +Figs 1C +, +2D +). Dorsal collar margins V-shaped, fused to faecal groove, forming dorsal pockets ( +Figs 1A +, +2A–C +). Anterior peristomial ring fully exposed above dorsal collar margins ( +Figs 1A +, +2A–C +). Mid-dorsal margin of anterior peristomial ring triangular ( +Fig. 2B +), visible once crown removed. Oval brownish peristomial moldures exposed beyond dorsal collar margins ( +Figs 1A +, +2A–C +). Dorsal lips with mid-rib (radiolar appendages), dorsal pinnular appendages absent. Ventral lips ear-shaped. Ventral shield of collar well developed, almost trapezoidal ( +Figs 1B +, +2E +). Two diagonal glandular shields at the base of ventral lappets, separated from each other by mid-ventral incision of collar ( +Figs 1B +, +2E +). + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Potamethus filatovae +( +Levenstein, 1961 +) + +n. comb. +, lectotype stained with methylene blue. A) Peristomial moldures and first three thoracic chaetigers, dorsal view, B) collar and base of radiolar crown, ventral view, C) base of radiolar crown, peristomium and first three thoracic chaetigers, lateral view, D) thorax, ventral view, E) mid-abdominal segments, ventral view, F) posterior end, dorsal view, G) distal ends of radioles. Abbreviations: apr—anterior peristomial ring, fg—faecal groove switch, pl—parallel lamella, pm)—peristomial moldure, vs—ventral sacs, vsc—ventral shield of collar. Numbers: 1, 2, 3 …—number of chaetigers. Scale bars: A–C, F) 500 um, D) 2 mm, E) 1 mm, G) 2.5 mm. White arrow and asterisk in B points to the incised mid-ventral margin of collar. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Potamethus filatovae +( +Levenstein, 1961 +) + +n. comb. +, paralectotypes stained with methylene blue. A) Peristomium and first three thoracic chaetigers, latero-dorsal view, B) peristomium and first three thoracic chaetigers, dorsal view, C) base of radiolar crown, peristomium and first two thoracic chaetigers, dorsal view, D) base of radiolar crown and collar, lateral view, E) base of radiolar crown and collar, ventral view, F) internal wall of tube with oocytes, G) worm partially exposed from tube. Abbreviations: apr—anterior peristomial ring, pl—parallel lamella, pm—peristomial moldure, vs—ventral sacs, vsc—ventral shield of collar. Numbers: 1, 2, 3 …—number of chaetigers. Scale bars: A, B) 1.25 mm, C–E) 500 um, F–G) 2.5 mm. Black arrow in B points to the triangular, mid-dorsal margin of anterior peristomial ring. Black arrow and asterisk in E points to the incised mid-ventral margin of collar, other two black arrows points to the diagonal glandular shields at the base of ventral lappets. + + + +Collar chaetae (chaetiger 1) composed of two groups of narrowly hooded chaetae ( +Figs 3A, B +, +4A, B +); superior group more longer than two times the length of the inferior group ( +Fig. 3A +). Thorax with 8 chaetigers ( +Fig. 1D +). Ventral thoracic shields well developed, rectangular ( +Fig. 1D +). Glandular ridge on chaetiger 2 visible only dorsally, broad, brownish in +lectotype +(in some +paralectotypes +hardly visible). + + +Thoracic notochaetae of chaetigers 2–8 with superior group of elongate narrowly hooded chaetae ( +Figs 3C, D +, +4D +) and with inferior group of paleate chaetae arranged in 3 rows ( +Figs 3C, E–H +, +4C–E +). Bayonet chaetae absent. Thoracic uncini avicular, with handles 7–8 times longer than crest length ( +Fig. 3J +); crest without hood, with 5–6 rows of teeth of nearly equal size above main fang, covering half of main fang ( +Fig. 3K +), and with a small hump on the angle between external margin of neck and handle (a slight swelling opposite to breast). Companion chaetae teardrop shaped, with a narrow dentate head and very long tip (+3 times longer than uncinal main fang), some tips distally enrolled ( +Fig. 3L–M +). + + +Abdomen with 51 (26–58) chaetigers. Ventral abdominal shields well developed, oval, with marked brown margins, separated from each other by faecal groove ( +Fig. 1E +). Abdominal neurochaetae with two rows of narrowly hooded chaetae, those of inferior row three times shorter than those in superior row ( +Fig. 5A–C, E–G +); surface covered with fine bristles visible only under SEM ( +Fig. 5D +). Abdominal uncini avicular with a small hump on the angle between external margin of neck and handle (a slight swelling opposite to breast) ( +Fig. 5J–K +); breast as a narrow swelling, handles 2.5 times longer than crest length ( +Fig. 5J–L +), main fang surmounted by 4–5 rows of nearly equal-size teeth above main fang, covering half of main fang ( +Fig. 5J–I +). + + +Pygidium with terminal anus ( +Fig. 1F +) and two lateral rounded papillae, visible in some +paralectotypes +and mentioned in the original description, and without anal cirrus. Tubes silty, smooth, fragile ( +Fig. 2G +). One tube of +paralectotype +with eggs inside ( +Fig. 2F +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/CF/F9/03CFF948FF8B2B578B8376BCFA8B3E78.xml b/data/03/CF/F9/03CFF948FF8B2B578B8376BCFA8B3E78.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b1cb5d703b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/CF/F9/03CFF948FF8B2B578B8376BCFA8B3E78.xml @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ + + + +Jasmineira filatovae Levenstein, 1961, the deepest known sabellid is a Potamethus Chamberlin, 1919: redescription, new combination and generic emendation + + + +Author + +Tovar-Hernandez, Maria Ana +Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Biosistemática, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Av. Pedro de Alba esq. Manuel L. Barragán, San Nicolás de los Garza, 66455, Nuevo León, México + + + +Author + +Jirkov, Igor A. +Department of General Ecology and Hydrobiology, Biological Faculty, Leninskiye Gory, 1, building 12, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119234, Russia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +48 +70 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.2 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.2 +1175-5326 +13209689 +46D2A955-0566-4711-A099-2C6947487E18 + + + + + + + +Potamethus malmgreni +(Hansen, 1878) + + + + + + + +Figures 6–7 + + + + + +Potamilla malmgreni +Hansen, 1878, p. 13 + +, pl. IX, figs. 9–13. + + + + + +Patamilla malmgreni +Hansen, 1882 +, p. 42 + + +–43, pl. VII, figs. 23–27. + + + + + + +Gorbunovia malmgreni +Annenkova, 1952: 152–153 + + +, figs. 7–8 +fide + +Hartman, 1965a: 76 + +. + + + + + +Potamethus malmgreni +— + + +Hartman, 1965a: 77 + +.— + +Knight-Jones, 1983: 271 + +.— +Jirkov, 2001 +, 549, figs. 1–6.— + + +Budaeva +et al. +, 2014: 227 + + +. + + + + + +Material examined + + +Norwegian Sea and Arctic Ocean ( +DGEH +and +ZIN +): samples from several oceanographic cruises ( +Table 3 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/CF/F9/03CFF948FF962B4A8B837569FD703A3C.xml b/data/03/CF/F9/03CFF948FF962B4A8B837569FD703A3C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d24770b8cf0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/CF/F9/03CFF948FF962B4A8B837569FD703A3C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +Jasmineira filatovae Levenstein, 1961, the deepest known sabellid is a Potamethus Chamberlin, 1919: redescription, new combination and generic emendation + + + +Author + +Tovar-Hernandez, Maria Ana +Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Biosistemática, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Av. Pedro de Alba esq. Manuel L. Barragán, San Nicolás de los Garza, 66455, Nuevo León, México + + + +Author + +Jirkov, Igor A. +Department of General Ecology and Hydrobiology, Biological Faculty, Leninskiye Gory, 1, building 12, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119234, Russia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +48 +70 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.2 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.2 +1175-5326 +13209689 +46D2A955-0566-4711-A099-2C6947487E18 + + + + + + + +Potamethus +Chamberlin, 1919 + +, emended + + + + + + +Diagnosis modified from +Knight-Jones (1983) +, +Fitzhugh (1989) +and + +Capa +et al. +(2019) + +. + + +Radioles on semicircular lobes, each with at least four rows of vacuolated cells (one species with a single row). +Inter-radiolar membrane present or absent +, radiolar flanges and basal flanges both absent. Radiolar eyes absent. Dorsal lips with radiolar appendages, pinnular appendages absent; ventral radiolar appendages absent, ventral lips, parallel lamellae and ventral sacs all present, the latter inside radiolar crown. Anterior peristomial ring with narrow ventral lobe. Posterior peristomial ring distinctly elongated, of variable morphology. +Moldures in each side of anterior peristomial ring +in some species. Peristomial eyespots absent. Thorax usually with eight chaetigers (but some species with 9, 10 or 17 thoracic chaetigers), abdomen with variable number. Glandular ridge on chaetiger 2 present +or absent +. Ventral shields present. Interramal eyespots absent. Collar chaetae elongate, with narrow or broad hood; inferior thoracic notochaetae paleate. Thoracic uncini avicular, with several rows of progressively shorter teeth above main fang, breast developed or not, medium to +long-sized handles, and a small hump on the angle between external margin of neck and handle can be present +; neuropodial companion chaetae present, with long handle and distal asymmetrical tip. Abdominal uncini avicular, with several rows of short teeth above main fang, reduced breast, distinctly elongate neck between breast and main fang, elongate handle, and a +small hump +on the angle between external margin of neck and handle can be present. Abdominal neurochaetae as elongate, narrowly hooded chaetae, in anterior group, and modified, elongate, narrowly hooded chaetae, in posterior group. Pygidial eyespots absent. Pygidial cirrus absent. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF169FFB1FF78FDC8972D5D81.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF169FFB1FF78FDC8972D5D81.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..090ebf88f0f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF169FFB1FF78FDC8972D5D81.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +4. + +Parahieroglyphus bilineatus +(Saussure, 1912) + + + + + + + +Although this species widely occurs in the southwest region of +India +, we have reported specimens from Koti, Azad Jammu & Kashmir. It is likely to extend to the northern territories, including the surrounding region of +Punjab +( +Pakistan +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF169FFB1FF78FEA092E75EB9.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF169FFB1FF78FEA092E75EB9.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f8def6f3393 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF169FFB1FF78FEA092E75EB9.xml @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +3. + +Chorthippus angulatus +Tarbinsky, 1927 + + + + + + + +This species is widely distributed across the temperate zone of Asia, including the surrounding regions of +Afghanistan +( + +Cigliano +et al +. 2024 + +). We have reported a single specimen from the Juniper Forest in Ziarat, Balochistan. It will be apparent that the numbers could increase significantly if Quetta, Pishin, and Loralai are explored. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF169FFB1FF78FF7C92675E51.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF169FFB1FF78FF7C92675E51.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..770c8f11970 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF169FFB1FF78FF7C92675E51.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +2. + +Brachycrotaphus longiceps +( +Bolívar, 1902 +) + + + + + + + + +This species is widespread across +India +. We have reported +two specimens +from +Azad Jammu +& +Kashmir +, and it is likely to be extended to the northern territories of +Pakistan +, including +Gilgit-Baltistan + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78F8E496DD58F5.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78F8E496DD58F5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4c2ab643a92 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78F8E496DD58F5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +3. + +Ochrilidia beybienkoi +Cejchan, 1969 + + + + + + + +This arid mountainous species has been reported in Panjgur, Kech, Balochistan. While its known range is primarily restricted to +Afghanistan +, the collection of this species in Balochistan reflects its sporadic nature ( +Wagan & Sultana 2013 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78F9DC96DD59AC.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78F9DC96DD59AC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..12efef330e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78F9DC96DD59AC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +2. + +Sphodromerus undulatus afghanus +Bey-Bienko, 1949 + + + + + + + +This species has been reported from Henna Lake, Quetta, Balochistan. The distribution range of this species is only restricted to +Afghanistan +; occasionally, it is found in Balochistan ( +Wagan & Sultana 2013 +; +Sultana & Wagan 2015 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78FA6893515945.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78FA6893515945.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..56108473cf5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78FA6893515945.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +1. + +Pternoscirta cinctifemur +(Walker, 1859) + + + + + + + +This species is only restricted to +India +and +Nepal +( + +Cigliano +et al +. 2024 + +). We have reported four individuals from Azad Jammu & Kashmir, which suggests its limited distribution underscores the need for conservation efforts. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78FDAC97EE5D81.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78FDAC97EE5D81.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ccf0092c353 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78FDAC97EE5D81.xml @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +3. + +Chorthippus (Chorthippus) dorsatus +(Zetterstedt, 1821) + + + + + + + +This rare species only restricted to Azad Jammu & Kashmir and notably absent from the other regions based on its distribution across +Pakistan +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78FE7893405D55.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78FE7893405D55.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1e5e73136cb --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78FE7893405D55.xml @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +2. + +Paraconophyma kashmirica +Mistshenko 1950 + + + + + + + +This species is reported from Kasmir and is considered a high-altitude species ( +Bey-Bienko & Mistshenko 1951 +; + +Mahmood +et al +. 2002 + +; +Gupta & Chandra 2018 +). It is unlikely to occur at low sea level ( +Wagan & Sultana 2013 +). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78FF7C920A5E29.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78FF7C920A5E29.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..656070f0c64 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16CFFB4FF78FF7C920A5E29.xml @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +1. + +Catantops erubescens +( +Walker, 1870 +) + + + + + + + +This species has a particular range: Azad Jammu & Kashmir and +Tamil Nadu +( +India +) ( + +Cigliano +et al. +2024 + +). Due to its limited range, conservation measures may be necessary; otherwise, its diversity may disappear from these regions as well. Earlier, this species was reported from +North Bengal +, +Arunachal Pradesh +, +West Bengal +, and Azad +Jammu and Kashmir +( +Kirby 1914 +; +Shishodia & Chandra 2010 +; Naizer +et al +. 2014). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78F8E497835891.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78F8E497835891.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d8c72c4e5d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78F8E497835891.xml @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +1. + +Chloebora bramina +Saussure, 1884 + + + + + + + +This species is widely distributed throughout +India +and may extend to several neighboring states, including +Bangladesh +, +Bhutan +, and +Pakistan +. In a recent study, +Wagan & Khatri (2021) +recorded this species for the first time in Patriata (New Murree, at +3,500 m +) It is expected that this species might occur in the northern regions of +Pakistan +, including Gilgit-Baltistan. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FAB5940A5945.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FAB5940A5945.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c13285a3061 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FAB5940A5945.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +7. + +Oedipoda fedtschenki fedtschenki +Saussure, 1884 + + + + + + + +This species was reported from Loralai, +Balochistan +.A single individual was captured from a + +Ficus religiosa + +(locally known as the sacred Fig tree or Peepul tree) of the mulberry family. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the initial regional record of this species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FB8895645A7D.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FB8895645A7D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5bc7922af1d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FB8895645A7D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +6. + +Scintharista notabilis cinctipes +Uvarov, 1941 + + + + + + + +This species has been recorded for the first time from Balochistan, with previous records from Thar in Sindh ( + +Sultana +et al +. 2013 + +). Confined to +India +and +Pakistan +, it exhibits a limited distribution within this geographic area, highlighting its status as a species specific to the region. Comprehensive research and surveys are essential to gain a deeper understanding of its range and ecological preferences. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FC4593635B78.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FC4593635B78.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3737a7302bc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FC4593635B78.xml @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +5. + +Sphodromerus undulatus pedestris +Uvarov, 1943 + + + + + + + + +This species has been reported from +Balochistan +. +Uvarov (1943) +recorded its +type +material from +Dhar Murree +, +Punjab +, +Pakistan +. +It +seems probable that this species may occur in other ecological zones with more frequent surveys + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FD6497575CCD.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FD6497575CCD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d169498b719 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FD6497575CCD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +4. + +Oxya nitidula +( +Walker, 1870 +) + + + + + + + +This species has been reported from various regions of +Pakistan +, except for Gilgit-Baltistan. + +Cigliano +et al +. (2024) + +listed East +India +, +Iran +, including some parts of +Balochistan +( +Pakistan +), and +Azerbaijan +for its asserted distribution. Usmani & Shafee (1985) also reported its incidence in +India +; notably, it had not been previously reported from +Pakistan +. This might be due to the close resemblance of this species to + +O. japonica + +or its sibling species, potentially causing confusion. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FF7C95FE5EC5.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FF7C95FE5EC5.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1f9eabb2f3f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16EFFB6FF78FF7C95FE5EC5.xml @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +2. + +Oxyina javana +( +Willemse, 1955 +) + + + + + + + +This species is attributed to high altitudes in +Java +, +Indonesia +( +3,678 m +) and in Kashmir, +India +( +1,850 m +) ( +Willemse 1955 +, +Baba & Usmani 2021 +). However, it has been recorded for the first time at low sea levels in Bahawalpur, Punjab ( +117 m +), and in Achro That Sindh ( +28 m +). +Hollis (1975) +observed a close resemblance in + +O. bidentata + +, + +O. sinobidentata + +, and + +O. javana + +, indicating divergent evolution through geographical isolation. The recent discovery in these locations confirms the presence of this species at low sea levels. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78F8D892D85890.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78F8D892D85890.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ac77e9e52cd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78F8D892D85890.xml @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +1. + +Hieroglyphus concolor +( +Walker, 1870 +) + + + + + + + +This species has been recorded for the first time in Kashmore, Tangwani (Sindh) and Rawapindi (Punjab). It is not a common species ( +Mason 1973 +). It was found across +India +, +Myanmar +, +Bangladesh +, and +China +( + +Nazir +et al +. 2014 + +; +Kumar & Usmani 2015 +). However, to our knowledge it was perhaps misidentified as + +H. perpolita + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FA04973D59D4.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FA04973D59D4.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2b2ff3a4d86 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FA04973D59D4.xml @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +11. + +Ochrilidia ahmadi +Wagan & Baloch 2001 + + + + + + + +Wagan & Baloch (2001) reported the existence of this species in Rawalpindi, exclusively documented through a +type +locality. Our expeditions have not observed this species, and the current study raises conservation concerns for its status. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FB4092395A7D.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FB4092395A7D.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c04aca49f8f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FB4092395A7D.xml @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +9. + +Chloebora crassa +Saussure,1884 + + + + + + + +Wagan & Khatri (2021) +report this species from +Sindh +(Thatta, Jungshahi) and +Balochistan +(Loralai, Bar Khan). We are unable to confirm the occurrence of this species in the described localities. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FC4494115B31.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FC4494115B31.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..08769d053b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FC4494115B31.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +8. + +Kabulia balucha +Uvarov, 1931 + + + + + + + +This rare and flightless species was initially reported in Quetta ( +Uvarov 1933 +), and since then, only a few individuals have been observed in Loralai, Zhob and Quetta ( +Wagan & Sultana 2013 +). However, during the current expedition, we were unable to report a single individual, confirming its rare status. Its rarity suggests that it is crucial to prioritize conservation efforts for this species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FD1193AE5CCD.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FD1193AE5CCD.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..23b483c8074 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FD1193AE5CCD.xml @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +7. + +Notostaurus albicornis +(Eversmann, 1848) + + + + + + + +This species is widely distributed in +Iran +, +Turkmenistan +, +Uzbekistan +, +Afghanistan +, and +Mongolia +( + +Cigliano +et al +. 2024 + +). However, it occurs as a scarce vagrant or accidental import in Quetta, Chaman, and Turbat, in Balochistan. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FDAC92C35D81.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FDAC92C35D81.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5d1f3505e27 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FDAC92C35D81.xml @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +6. + +Dociostaurus (Dociostaurus) maroccanus +(Thunberg, 1815) + + + + + + + + +The Moroccan locust is widespread across +western Europe +and the temperate zones surrounding some parts of the Palearctic regions. However, it is rarely found in Chaman, Quetta, and Zhob districts of +Balochistan + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FE7995685D55.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FE7995685D55.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5ed145e2b18 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FE7995685D55.xml @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +5. + +Choroedocus pallens +Uvarov, 1933 + + + + + + + +This Palearctic species was reported by +Uvarov (1933) +from Mach Bolan, +Balochistan +. Although we conducted several expeditions, we were unable to collect any individuals. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FF7C95285E29.xml b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FF7C95285E29.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a3c5830214d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/F0/87/03F087BBF16FFFB7FF78FF7C95285E29.xml @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + +Annotated catalogue of Pakistani Acrididae (Orthoptera: Caelifera: Acridoidea) + + + +Author + +Sultana, Riffat +Department of Zoology, University of Sindh-Pakistan. & Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + + + +Author + +Song, Hojun +Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843 - 2475 USA. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +1 +47 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.1 +1175-5326 +2FEEF471-EF3C-4CF1-84B1-462AE89F9A16 + + + + + + +4. + +Pachyacris vinosa +( +Walker, 1870 +) + + + + + + + +This species is widespread in +China +and surrounding areas, including +Vietnam +, Nagaland, +Bangladesh +, +Nepal +, and +Himachal Pradesh +. During this expedition, a single individual was captured from Azad Jammu & Kashmir. However, this species is limited to the +Maharashtra +western peninsular region of +India +( + +Cigliano +et al +. 2024 + +. Therefore, conservation efforts are essential to ensure its protection. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/F4/2B/03F42B74986EFFAF48F5FC67E4F9D446.xml b/data/03/F4/2B/03F42B74986EFFAF48F5FC67E4F9D446.xml index f65e450f529..23901b50454 100644 --- a/data/03/F4/2B/03F42B74986EFFAF48F5FC67E4F9D446.xml +++ b/data/03/F4/2B/03F42B74986EFFAF48F5FC67E4F9D446.xml @@ -1,51 +1,52 @@ - - - -Juvenile instars of Sellnickia caudata (Michael, 1908) (Acari, Oribatida, Sellnickiidae) + + + +Juvenile instars of Sellnickia caudata (Michael, 1908) (Acari, Oribatida, Sellnickiidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Ermilov, Sergey G. -Tyumen State University, Institute of Environmental and Agricultural Biology (X-BIO), Tyumen, Russia. +Ermilov, Sergey G. +Tyumen State University, Institute of Environmental and Agricultural Biology (X-BIO), Tyumen, Russia. - - -Author + + +Author -Salavatulin, Vladimir M. -Tyumen State University, Institute of Environmental and Agricultural Biology (X-BIO), Tyumen, Russia. & Joint Russian-Vietnamese Tropical Research and Technological Centre, Southern Branch, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. +Salavatulin, Vladimir M. +Tyumen State University, Institute of Environmental and Agricultural Biology (X-BIO), Tyumen, Russia. & Joint Russian-Vietnamese Tropical Research and Technological Centre, Southern Branch, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-23 + +2024 + +2024-07-23 - -5485 + +5485 - -1 + +1 - -38 -48 + +38 +48 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.5 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.5 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.5 -1175-5326 -C9A50DB4-5DFE-4C31-AB46-D3913E192D07 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.5 +1175-5326 +13209587 +C9A50DB4-5DFE-4C31-AB46-D3913E192D07 @@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ ( -Figs 1–8 +Figs 1–8 ) @@ -78,49 +79,49 @@ Integument ( -Fig. 8M +Fig. 8M ). Body color of larva, proto- and deutonymphs colorless to light brownish but legs and dorsal side of prodorsum intensely pigmented; body color of tritonymph brown but legs, gnathosoma, epimeres, and dorsal side of prodorsum usually intensely pigmented. Body surface densely microporose (distinctly visible on dorsal side of prodorsum and in epimeral region; -Fig. 8M +Fig. 8M ); additionally, anogenital region partially slightly folded. Prodorsum ( -Figs 1A +Figs 1A ; -2A +2A ; -3A +3A ; -4A +4A ; -5A, B +5A, B ; -8A–C +8A–C ). Relatively short, about 1/2 length of gastronotic region. Rostrum broadly rounded. Dorsal side of prodorsum with large sclerite bordered by lateral carinae. Rostral (LA: 30– 34; PN: 34–37; DN: 45–52; TN: 49–60), lamellar (LA: 41–49; PN: 52–61; DN: 82–90; TN: 112–116), interlamellar (LA: 60–64: PN: 90–94; DN: 120–131; TN: 161–169), and exobothridial (LA: 22–26; PN: 34–37; DN: 120–131; TN: 161–169) setae setiform ( in blunt), barbed ( -Fig. 8C +Fig. 8C ); bothridial seta (LA: 15; PN: 19; DN, TN: 22–26) with short stalk and globular, slightly barbed head ( -Figs 8A, B +Figs 8A, B ). Transverse lineate ridge located anteriorly to rostral setae. Gastronotic region ( -Figs 1A +Figs 1A ; -2A +2A ; -3A +3A ; -4A +4A ; -5A, B +5A, B ; -8D–G +8D–G ). Gastronotic macrosclerite (shield) not observed. Gastronotum (and adanal region in tritonymph) with scattered poorly visible pit-like structures ( -Fig. 8F +Fig. 8F ), posteriorly rounded. Larva with 13 pairs of setae ( c 3 @@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ and , lm stiff, blunt, barbed ( -Fig. 8D +Fig. 8D ), others setiform, smooth; all setae except h 2 @@ -153,12 +154,12 @@ and h 3 with excentrosclerite at the base ( -Fig. 8D +Fig. 8D ). Nymphal instars with 14 pairs ( c 3 absent) of setiform, smooth setae; all setae with excentrosclerite at the base ( -Fig. 8E +Fig. 8E ). Length of gastronotic setae: LA: c 1 @@ -194,7 +195,7 @@ absent) of setiform, smooth setae; all setae with excentrosclerite at the base ( 2 : 5; PN: 7–11; DN, TN: 5–7. Opisthonotal gland opening and all cupules distinct. - + FIGURE 1. @@ -229,15 +230,15 @@ roughened; length of adoral setae: LA: 7; PN: 7–9; DN: 9–11; TN: 13–15; al Epimeral region ( -Figs 1B +Figs 1B ; -2B +2B ; -3B +3B ; -4B +4B ; -5A, B +5A, B ). Setal formulas for epimeres: larva: 3-1-2 ( 1c as typical scale covering Claparède’s organ); protonymph: 3-1-2-1; deutonymph: 3-1-2-2, tritonymph: 3-1-3-3; length of setae: LA: @@ -269,20 +270,20 @@ as typical scale covering Claparède’s organ); protonymph: 3-1-2-1; deutonymph Anogenital region ( -Figs 1B +Figs 1B ; -2B +2B ; -3B +3B ; -4B +4B ; -5A, B +5A, B ). Ontogeny of genital (PN: 7–11; DN: anterior and posterior setae: 7–9, median seta: 11; TN: anterior and posterior setae: 11, median three setae: 15), aggenital (DN: 9–11; TN: 17–19), anal (TN: 11), and adanal (DN: 9–11; TN: 15) setal formulas, proto- to tritonymph: 1-3-5, 0-1-1, 0-0-2, 0-3-3, respectively; all setae setiform, smooth, without excentrosclerite at the base; paraproctal segment with two gastronotic setae p in larva, without setae in protonymph and deutonymph. Adanal cupule distinct; anal cupule not observed. - + FIGURE 2. @@ -297,17 +298,17 @@ in larva, without setae in protonymph and deutonymph. Adanal cupule distinct; an Legs ( -Figs 6D–F +Figs 6D–F ; -7D–G +7D–G ; -8I–L +8I–L ). Claw of each leg dorsally slightly barbed. Tarsal pulvillus well developed ( -Fig. 8I, J +Fig. 8I, J ). Tarsi I–IV with elongate oval ventrobasal porose area ( -Fig. 8K +Fig. 8K ); femora I–IV with large ventrolateral (including antiaxial and paraxial sides) porose area ( -Fig. 8L +Fig. 8L ). Formulas of leg setation and solenidia: larva I (0-2- 2-3-16) [1-1-1], II (0-2-2-2-13) [1-1-1], III (0-2-1-1-13) [1-1-0]; protonymph I (0-2-2-3-16) [1-1-2], II (0-2-2-2-13) [1-1-1], III (0-2-1-1-13) [1-1-0], IV (0-0-0-0-7) [0-0-0]; deutonymph I (0-3-2-3-16) [1-2-2], II (0-3-2-2-13) [1-1-1], III (1-2-1-1-13) [1-1-0], IV (0-2-1-1-12) [0-1-0]; tritonymph I (1-3-2-3-18) [1-2-2], II (1-3-2-3-15) [1-1-1], III (1- 2[3]-1-1-15) [1-1-0], IV (0-2-2-1-12) [0-1-0]; homologies of setae and solenidia indicated in Table 1 ; solenidia ω diff --git a/data/17/6C/87/176C87A5927BDA53F5A9FE14C6BB3356.xml b/data/17/6C/87/176C87A5927BDA53F5A9FE14C6BB3356.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cc559750bb0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/17/6C/87/176C87A5927BDA53F5A9FE14C6BB3356.xml @@ -0,0 +1,301 @@ + + + +Reticulodermis lithogalla gen. nov. and sp. nov. of oak gall wasp from Mexico (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae) + + + +Author + +García-Martiñón, Rosa D. +/0009-0005-4177-041X +Posgrado en Fitosanidad, Entomología y Acarología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Carretera México-Texcoco, Km 36.5, Montecillo, 56230 Montecillo, Estado de México (México). +rosadeliagama@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Equihua-Martínez, Amando +0000-0003-4392-3924 +Posgrado en Fitosanidad, Entomología y Acarología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Carretera México-Texcoco, Km 36.5, Montecillo, 56230 Montecillo, Estado de México (México). +equihuaa@colpos.mx + + + +Author + +Estrada-Venegas, Edith G. +0000-0003-1347-6369 +Posgrado en Fitosanidad, Entomología y Acarología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Carretera México-Texcoco, Km 36.5, Montecillo, 56230 Montecillo, Estado de México (México). +estradae@colpos.mx + + + +Author + +Melika, George +0000-0002-5204-6890 +Plant Health Diagnostic National Reference Laboratory, National Food Chain Safety Office, Budaörsi str. 141 - 145, Budapest 1118, Hungary. +melikageorge@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Romero-Rangel, Silvia +. +sromero@unam.mx + + + +Author + +Cuesta-Porta, Víctor +0000-0002-6616-904X +Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biologia, Departament de Biologia Animal, Avda. Diagonal 645, 08028 - Barcelona (Catalonia). +vcuesta@ub.edu + + + +Author + +Pujade-Villar, Juli +0000-0001-7798-2717 +Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biologia, Departament de Biologia Animal, Avda. Diagonal 645, 08028 - Barcelona (Catalonia). +jpujade@ub.edu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +109 +120 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.4 +1175-5326 +1BAF8A8D-E8F4-43C4-BED3-3AC47AAE0BDB + + + + + + + +Reticulodermis lithogalla +García-Martiñón & Pujade-Villar + +sp. nov. + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +68DD1A2C-A74E-4E79-8CF0-EA02329AF10A + + + + + +( +Figs 1–3 +) + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +asexual female (ŏ) deposited in +UB +(JP-V col.) with the following labels: “ +Barrios +, +San Francisco-San Nicolás Guadalupe +, +Municipio de San Felipe del Progreso +( +Estado de México +, +MEX +)’ (white label), +19°27´39´´N +100°2´6´´W + +Q. crassipes + +, ( + +04.ii.2023 + +) + +13-19.ii.2023 + +(leg. +García-Martinón +)’ (white label) + +, +Holotype +ŏ + +Reticulodermis lithogalla +García-Martiñón & Pujade-Villar + +n. gen & n. sp. (red label). + +PARATYPES +(26ŏ) with the same data as holotype: 8ŏ deposited in +UB +(JP-V col.), 2ŏ deposited in PHDNRL, 16ŏ deposited in Colpos + +. + + + + +Etymology. +Related to the shape of the gall which resembles a stone, from Greek: λΊΘΟς líthos ‘stone’ and Latin galla ‘gall’. + + + + +Description. +Asexual female. + + +Length +. +1.9–2.4 mm +(n = 8) + + +Coloration +( +Fig. 3a +). Head yellowish to light brown; clypeus and mandibles darker, teeth of mandibles not darkened; lower part of the face, below the toruli, slightly darker. Antennae dark brown, with partially lighter scape and pedicel. Mesonotum colored as the head; mesoscutum with dark brown areas running along the anterior lines, notaulus and parapsidal lines; lower part of the mesopleura (sometimes also the lateral margins), metapleura, propodeum and mesoscutellar foveae dark brown to black. Legs, including the coxae, same color as mesosoma. Wing venation brown. Metasoma, including hypopygium, light brown, darker than mesosoma, dorsally darker than basally. + + +Head +( +Figs 1a–c +). Transversely ovate, reticulate, with the interocellar area elevated dorsally above the head in frontal view, 1.2–1.3× as broad as high, in dorsal view 2.2× as broad as long and narrower than the mesosoma. Transfacial line 1.4× as long as height of eye. Torulus located slightly above half height of eye; distance between toruli 0.5× the diameter of the torulus, with some fine transverse carinae; diameter of torulus slightly shorter than distance between torulus and eye. Gena reticulate, broadened behind eye in frontal view, broader than the width of eye in lateral view. Lower face alutaceous with numerous carinae radiating from the clypeus and almost reaching eye margin, sparsely pubescent; slightly elevated median area below toruli without carinae and rugae. Clypeus slightly trapezoid, nearly quadrangular, shining, almost smooth, emarginate ventrally and weakly incised medially. Anterior tentorial pits, epistomal sulcus and clypeo-pleurostomal lines present, weakly impressed. Front, vertex, ocellar area and occiput reticulate, glabrous, without carinae and rugae. Ocelli equal in size; POL 2.0× as long as OOL distance, OOL almost 2.0× as long as diameter of ocellus and a slightly longer than LOL. Postocciput and postgena alutaceous, with few setae. Occipital foramen 2.0× as high as height of postgenal bridge; posterior tentorial pit ovate; gular sulcus slightly impressed, incomplete; hypostomal carina emarginate, continuing into the postgenal sulcus. + + +Antenna +( +Fig. 1e +) almost equal in length to the head+mesosoma, with 12 flagellomeres, sometimes with an inconspicuous suture between F11–F12, and in some teratological specimens with only 10 flagellomeres. Antennal formula 19: 13×7: 29: 23: 20: 17: 15: 14: 12: 12: 12: 12: 11: 14. Placodeal sensilla on F3–F12, absent on F1 and F2, on F3 present in the distal half only. + + +Mesosoma +( +Figs 2a–d +). Slightly longer than high in lateral view, with sparse white setae. Pronotum reticulate-rugulose, sculpture less prominent and with some wrinkles in ventral part. Mesoscutum slightly broader than long, reticulate, sometimes with coarser irregular rugae in the posterior third between the reticulate sculpture. Notaulus absent or inconspicuous, partially visible and impressed on posterior third, reticulate, wrinkled. Anterior parallel line visible, coriaceous-alutaeous, extending to half-length of mesoscutum, to tegulae level, slightly diverge anteriorly and slightly dilated distally. Parapsidal line visible, coriaceous-alutaceous, extending beyond tegula. Median mesoscutal line absent. Parascutal carina reaching anterior part of mesoscutum, smooth, with some carinae till tegula level. Mesoscutellum 0.6× as long as mesoscutum length, slightly broader than long, posteriorly rounded, uniformly reticulate-rugulose, sometimes with inconspicuous rugae between the sculpture, overhanging metanotum. Mesoscutellar fovea inconspicuous, anterior part of mesoscutellum depressed in a shallow continuous pit, rugulose with longitudinal rugae, not delimited posteriorly; median carina not always present, inconspicuous. Circumscutellar carina absent. Mesopleuron reticulate, with setae at the base, speculum alutaceous-coriaceous; mesopleural triangle delicately rugose, with dense setae. Metapleural sulcus reaching mesopleuron at 2/3 of its height. Axillula inconspicuous, reticulate, with white setae. Subaxillular bar shining, smooth, higher posteriorly; postalar process absent. Metascutellum reticulate-rugulose, higher than height of shining rugose ventral impressed area. Metanotal trough alutaceous, shining, with few setae. Propodeum rugose and glabrous centrally; propodeal carina absent, inconspicuous, fragmented; lateral propodeal area alutaceous, with few setae and some radiating carinae around the nucha. Nucha with dorso-lateral wrinkles. + + +Legs +with reticulate sculpture. Tarsal claws simple, without basal lobe ( +Fig. 1d +). + + +Fore wing +( +Fig. 3a +). Longer than body length, hyaline, without cilia on margins. Radial cell 3.5× times as long as broad; 2r angled with short central projection; R1 straight, not reaching wing margin; Rs almost straight not reaching wing margin, not broadened in distal part. Areolet present. Rs+M visible on 4/5 of its length, its projection reaching basal vein below half of its length. + + +Metasoma +( +Figs 2e–f +). Shorter than head+mesosoma, as long as high in lateral view; second metasomal tergum with few white setae laterally; subsequent terga weakly micropunctured. Hypopygium micropunctured. Prominent part of ventral spine of hypopygium needle-like, nearly 8.0× as long as broad, with scattered white setae, without apical tuft of setae. + + +Gall +( +Fig. 3b +). Irregularly globular, flat at the base, with a coriaceous surface, with scattered tufts of short pubescence across the gall surface; surface wrinkled, green to grayish-brown when mature. Small in size ( +2–4 mm +wide and +4–5 mm +long), on the underside of the leaves between the secondary veins, in variable numbers. Emergence holes usually located laterally. + + + + +Host. +Known only from + +Q. crassipes +Humb. & Bonpl. + +(section + +Lobatae + +). + + + + +Distribution. +Known from +Mexico State +only. + + + + +Biology. +Only the asexual generation is known. The galls were collected in early February; adults emerged shortly after. The galls remain on the tree for several months after adults emerged. Several parasitoids were obtained from the following Chalcidoidea families: +Torymidae +( +3♂ +& +5♀ +), +Eupelmidae +( +1♂ +), +Eulophidae +( +14♂ +& +19♀ +) and +Ormyridae +( +2♀ +), and also cynipid inquilines from the tribe +Synergini +( +6♀ +) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/17/6C/87/176C87A5927FDA50F5A9FB24C6F737CA.xml b/data/17/6C/87/176C87A5927FDA50F5A9FB24C6F737CA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2febc4e7d0f --- /dev/null +++ b/data/17/6C/87/176C87A5927FDA50F5A9FB24C6F737CA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,292 @@ + + + +Reticulodermis lithogalla gen. nov. and sp. nov. of oak gall wasp from Mexico (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae) + + + +Author + +García-Martiñón, Rosa D. +/0009-0005-4177-041X +Posgrado en Fitosanidad, Entomología y Acarología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Carretera México-Texcoco, Km 36.5, Montecillo, 56230 Montecillo, Estado de México (México). +rosadeliagama@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Equihua-Martínez, Amando +0000-0003-4392-3924 +Posgrado en Fitosanidad, Entomología y Acarología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Carretera México-Texcoco, Km 36.5, Montecillo, 56230 Montecillo, Estado de México (México). +equihuaa@colpos.mx + + + +Author + +Estrada-Venegas, Edith G. +0000-0003-1347-6369 +Posgrado en Fitosanidad, Entomología y Acarología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Carretera México-Texcoco, Km 36.5, Montecillo, 56230 Montecillo, Estado de México (México). +estradae@colpos.mx + + + +Author + +Melika, George +0000-0002-5204-6890 +Plant Health Diagnostic National Reference Laboratory, National Food Chain Safety Office, Budaörsi str. 141 - 145, Budapest 1118, Hungary. +melikageorge@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Romero-Rangel, Silvia +. +sromero@unam.mx + + + +Author + +Cuesta-Porta, Víctor +0000-0002-6616-904X +Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biologia, Departament de Biologia Animal, Avda. Diagonal 645, 08028 - Barcelona (Catalonia). +vcuesta@ub.edu + + + +Author + +Pujade-Villar, Juli +0000-0001-7798-2717 +Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biologia, Departament de Biologia Animal, Avda. Diagonal 645, 08028 - Barcelona (Catalonia). +jpujade@ub.edu + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +109 +120 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.4 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.4 +1175-5326 +1BAF8A8D-E8F4-43C4-BED3-3AC47AAE0BDB + + + + + + + +Reticulodermis +Pujade-Villar, Cuesta-Porta & Melika + +, +gen. nov. + + + + + +urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: +787B3A28-7ECD-4E2D-A16C-D439BB092A2D + + + + + +( +Figs 1–3 +) + + + + + +Type +species + +: + +Reticulodermis lithogalla +García-Martiñón & Pujade-Villar + +, + +sp. n. + +, designated herein. + + + + +Etymology. +The name is related to the reticulated sculpture of the head, mesosoma and legs, from Latin: reticulum ‘net’ and Greek δέρμα derma ‘skin’. + + +Gender +. Neutral. + + + + +Diagnosis +. + +Reticulodermis + +with a uniform reticulate sculpture of the head, pronotum,mesonotum,mesoscutellum, mesopleura (except speculum), metanotum, and legs. This uniform reticulate sculpturing is shared by only two other +Cynipini +genera: + +Erythres +Kinsey, 1937 + +and + +Kinseyella +Pujade-Villar & Melika, 2010 + +. + +Reticulodermis + +differs from + +Kinseyella + +by the prominent part of the ventral spine of hypopygium needle-like with long sparse setae without an apical tuft, while in + +Kinseyella + +it is short, broad, with parallel sides along entire length, with setae forming a dense apical tuft. The new genus is morphologically closely related also to + +Erythres + +but in + +Reticulodermis + +the metasoma only exhibiting few and sparse setae on the second metasomal tergum, malar sulcus absent, lateral propodeal carina inconspicuous or absent and the central propodeal area rugose while in + +Erythres + +the metasoma is strongly pubescent laterally, the malar sulcus short but present, lateral propodeal carina present and curved, central area of the propodeum smooth. The galls of these three genera are also very different. + +Erythres + +induces integral galls on buds while, + +Reticulodermis + +and + +Kinseyella + +induce detachable galls on leaves. Galls of + +Reticulodermis + +are small ( +4–5 mm +), irregular lenticular galls with strongly lignified parenchyma, while + +Kinseyella + +induces big round galls ( +20–55 mm +), with short felt-like pubescence, internal parenchyma with a hollow and with radiating filaments that hold the larval chamber. + + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Reticulodermis lithogalla +García-Martiñón & Pujade-Villar + + +sp. nov. + +: (a) head, frontal view (b) head, posterior view, (c) head, dorsal view, (d) tarsal claws, (e) antenna. + + + + +Description. +Head transversely ovate, reticulate, with the interocellar area elevated dorsally above the head in frontal view. Torulus located slightly above half height of eye. Gena reticulate, broadened behind eye in frontal view, broader than the width of eye in lateral view. Lower face alutaceous with numerous carinae radiating from the clypeus and almost reaching eye margin, sparsely pubescent; slightly elevated median area below toruli without carinae and rugae. Clypeus slightly trapezoid, nearly quadrangular, shining, almost smooth, emarginate ventrally and weakly incised medially. Anterior tentorial pits, epistomal sulcus and clypeo-pleurostomal lines present, weakly impressed. Front, vertex, ocellar area and occiput reticulate, glabrous, without carinae and rugae. Postocciput and postgena alutaceous, with few setae. Posterior tentorial pit ovate; gular sulcus slightly impressed, incomplete; hypostomal carina emarginate, continuing into the postgenal sulcus. + +Antenna almost equal in length to the head+mesosoma, with 12 flagellomeres, sometimes with an inconspicuous suture between F11–F12. Placodeal sensilla on F3–F12, absent on F1 and F2, on F3 present in the distal half only. + + +FIGURE 2. + +Reticulodermis lithogalla +García-Martiñón & Pujade-Villar + + +sp. nov. + +: (a) mesosoma, dorsal view (b) mesosoma, lateral view, (c) mesosoma, posterior view, (d) propodeum, (e) metasoma, (f) ventral spine of hypopygium, ventral view. + + + +Mesosoma +s +lightly longer than high in lateral view, with sparse white setae. Pronotum reticulate-rugulose, sculpture less prominent and with some wrinkles in ventral part. Mesoscutum slightly broader than long, reticulate, sometimes with coarser irregular rugae in the posterior third between the reticulate sculpture. Notaulus absent or inconspicuous, partially visible and impressed on posterior third, reticulate, wrinkled. Anterior parallel line visible, coriaceous-alutaeous. Parapsidal line visible, coriaceous-alutaceous, extending beyond tegula. Median mesoscutal line absent. Parascutal carina reaching anterior part of mesoscutum, smooth, with some carinae till tegula level. Mesoscutellum posteriorly rounded, uniformly reticulate-rugulose, sometimes with inconspicuous rugae between the sculpture, overhanging metanotum. Mesoscutellar fovea inconspicuous, anterior part of mesoscutellum depressed in a shallow continuous pit, rugulose with longitudinal rugae, not delimited posteriorly. Circumscutellar carina absent. Mesopleuron reticulate, with setae at the base, speculum alutaceous-coriaceous. Metascutellum reticulate-rugulose, higher than height of shining rugose ventral impressed area. Metanotal trough alutaceous, shining, with few setae. Propodeum rugose and glabrous centrally; propodeal carina absent, inconspicuous, fragmented; lateral propodeal area alutaceous, with few setae and some radiating carinae around the nucha. Nucha with dorso-lateral wrinkles. + + + +FIGURE 3. + +Reticulodermis lithogalla +García-Martiñón & Pujade-Villar + + +sp. nov. + +: (a) habitus, (b) galls and details of an isolated gall. + + +Legs with reticulate sculpture. Tarsal claws simple, without basal lobe. +Fore wing longer than body length, hyaline, without cilia on margins. Radial cell 3.5× times as long as broad; 2r angled with short central projection; R1 straight, not reaching wing margin; Rs almost straight not reaching wing margin, not broadened in distal part. Areolet present. + +Metasoma +s +horter than head+mesosoma, round and as long as high in lateral view; second metasomal tergum with few white setae laterally; subsequent terga weakly micropunctured. Hypopygium micropunctured. Prominent part of ventral spine of hypopygium needle-like, with scattered white setae, without apical tuft of setae. + + + + +Distribution. +Mexico +, +Mexico +State. A single species is known. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/26/3D/87/263D879D844D165823E1FA9FFE836866.xml b/data/26/3D/87/263D879D844D165823E1FA9FFE836866.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..73939b40db0 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/26/3D/87/263D879D844D165823E1FA9FFE836866.xml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ + + + +Description of juvenile instars of Scapheremaeus tonatiuh Palacios-Vargas, Ríos & Vázquez, 1998 (Acari, Oribatida, Cymbaeremaeidae) + + + +Author + +Ermilov, Sergey G. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-23 + + +5485 + + +1 + + +62 +72 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.7 + +journal article +300690 +10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.7 +cee6385e-d98b-4aac-8431-5db8a9875118 +1175-5326 +13209627 +42CDEB5F-8287-4102-89DD-910A9FD483DE + + + + + + + +Scapheremaeus tonatiuh +Palacios-Vargas, Ríos & Vázquez, 1998 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 1–6 +) + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC07431B0B83FDA18A610420.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC07431B0B83FDA18A610420.xml index 23ef0c39e4e..7dd389899fa 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC07431B0B83FDA18A610420.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC07431B0B83FDA18A610420.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ -Figures 61A–F +Figures 61A–F . @@ -148,11 +149,11 @@ same information as Body length: 8–9 mm ( -Figure 61A +Figure 61A ). Head: Dark, 1.3 times wider than long ( -Figure 61B +Figure 61B ). Clypeus weakly domed, densely punctate, punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameters, becoming marginally sparser medially, underlying surface smooth and shining. Process of labrum trapezoidal, 2 times wider than long, apical margin truncate, surface with weak latitudinal striations. Gena equalling width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance equalling diameter of lateral ocellus. Foveae dorsally narrow, occupying ⅓ of space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, narrowing slightly ventrally, only just reaching dorsal level of antennal insertions; foveae filled with dark brown hairs. Face with predominantly long black hairs, with white hairs restricted to frons medially. Gena with black hairs, becoming white on vertex; facial hairs often exceeding length of scape. Antennae dark, A5–12 ventrally slightly lightened by presence of grey scales; A3 exceeding A4+5, only slightly shorter than A4+5+6. @@ -161,17 +162,17 @@ Dark, 1.3 times wider than long ( : Scutum microreticulate, dull, with shallow and obscure punctures, punctures separated by 0.5–2 puncture diameters ( -Figure 61C +Figure 61C ). Scutellum less sculptured, weakly shining, densely and more distinctly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters. Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum and dorsolateral parts of propodeum with fine granular microreticulation, dull to very weakly shining. Propodeal triangle poorly defined, without lateral carinae, internal surface with finer microsculpture, thus defined relatively to dorsolateral parts of propodeum by change in sculpture ( -Figure 61D +Figure 61D ). Mesepisternum with long black hairs, clearly exceeding length of scape, scutum and scutellum with long white hairs. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, dorsal fringe composed of abundant long black plumose hairs, internal surface covered with long black simple hairs. Legs dark, pubescence black to brown. Flocculus moderately developed, composed of brownish to blackish plumose hairs; femoral scopae composed of light golden simple hairs, tibial scopae composed of light golden-brown simple hairs ventrally, dark brown hairs dorsally. Hind tarsal claws with inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation dark orange, nervulus interstitial to slightly antefurcal. Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, margins slightly depressed, apical rims lightened hyaline-brown ( -Figure 61E +Figure 61E ). Tergal discs shagreened, weakly shining, bearing small punctures with slightly and partially raised rims, giving rough appearance, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters, punctures almost absent from marginal areas. Tergal discs with abundant long white erect hairs, not forming hairbands, not obscuring underlying surface. Apical fringe of T5 and hairs flanking pygidial plate dark brown ( -Figure 61F +Figure 61F ). Pygidial plate broadly rounded, surface medially obscurely punctate, dull. @@ -179,7 +180,7 @@ Tergal discs dark, margins slightly depressed, apical rims lightened hyaline-bro Unknown. - + FIGURE 61. @@ -206,7 +207,7 @@ can be placed in the subgenus Euandrena due to the narrow facial foveae, occupying slightly less than one third of the space between the compound eye and a lateral ocellus, the foveae narrowing further ventrally, pronotum without humeral angle, A3 long (clearly exceeding A4+5), and the simple hairs of the tibial scopae (hairs not plumose). Due to the extensive black and white pubescence of the body ( -Figure 61A +Figure 61A ; including abundant black hairs on the face and mesepisternum), the orange-brown tibial scopae, the terga with somewhat erect and sparse long white hairs that do not obscure the underlying surface (not forming clear and dense apical hairbands), and slightly depressed and lightened hyaline-brown tergal rims, A. lustrum @@ -247,7 +248,7 @@ with the process of the labrum unusual, apically projecting, with deep median em A. boustaniae with foveae relatively broad, occupying over ½ the distance between the compound eye and a lateral ocellus). Genetically, the two species are separated by 12.83% (range 12.44–13.86%; -Figure 58 +Figure 58 ). Diagnosis against the superficially similar A. coronula diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC0943280B83FBD18DE405AC.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC0943280B83FBD18DE405AC.xml index 090516eb338..cb783c494ff 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC0943280B83FBD18DE405AC.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC0943280B83FBD18DE405AC.xml @@ -1,43 +1,44 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 @@ -58,9 +59,9 @@ -Figures 53A–F +Figures 53A–F ; -54A–F +54A–F . @@ -149,13 +150,13 @@ same information as Description: Female: Body length: 5–5.5 mm ( -Figure 53A +Figure 53A ). Head: Dark, 1.1 times wider than long ( -Figure 53B +Figure 53B ). Clypeus flattened over majority of surface, irregularly punctate with punctures of variable size, punctures separated by 0.5–2 puncture diameters, underlying surface shagreened in basal ⅔–¾, becoming shiny only in apical ⅓–¼ ( -Figure 53C +Figure 53C ). Process of labrum broad trapezoidal, 2 times wider than long, anterior margin ½ length of hind margin, straight to slightly emarginate, surface more or less shining. Gena equalling width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance ½ dimeter of lateral ocellus. Foveae dorsally narrow, occupying ½ space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, ventrally narrowing, almost linear, narrower than the width of the flagellum and separated from inner margin of compound eye by a distance equal to its own width; foveae filled with white hairs. Face, gena, vertex, and scape covered with short whitish hairs. Antennae basally dark, A6–12 ventrally lightened by presence of orange scales; A3 exceeding A4, slightly shorter than A4+5. @@ -164,12 +165,12 @@ Dark, 1.1 times wider than long ( : Scutum and scutellum with strong granular shagreen, weakly shining, regularly punctate with small punctures, punctures separated by 0.5–2 puncture diameters ( -Figure 53D +Figure 53D ). Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum and dorsolateral parts of propodeum with fine granular shagreen, weakly shining. Propodeal triangle covered with slightly coarser granular shagreen, joining and merging with short raised rugae basally, surface weakly shining; propodeal triangle thus defined by change in surface sculpture ( -Figure 53E +Figure 53E ). Mesepisternum with moderately long whitish hairs, becoming shorter and sub-squamous on scutum and scutellum. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, weakly formed, dorsal fringe composed of sparse whitish plumose hairs, internal surface with scattered simple white hairs. Legs dark, apical tarsal segments lightened orange, pubescence whitish. Flocculus incomplete, composed of white plumose hairs; femoral and tibial scopae composed of white simple hairs. Hind tarsal claws without inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation orange, nervulus antefurcal. - + FIGURE 53. @@ -188,7 +189,7 @@ female. A. Habitus, lateral view; B. Face, frontal view; C. Process of labrum, v Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, tergal margins lightened dark brown ( -Figure 53F +Figure 53F ). Tergal discs microreticulate, sculpture strongest basally, dull, becoming weaker apically, here weakly shining. Discs of T1–2 and marginal area of T1 impunctate; discs of T3–4 and marginal areas of T2–4 finely but distinctly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters. Tergal discs laterally with short white hairs, T2–4 apically with weak hairbands, widely separated on T2–3, complete on T4, not obscuring underlying surface. Apical fringe of T5 and hairs flanking pygidial plate golden-white. Pygidial plate narrow, rounded triangular, surface flattened, obscurely punctate, dull. @@ -196,11 +197,11 @@ Tergal discs dark, tergal margins lightened dark brown ( Body length: 5 mm ( -Figure 54A +Figure 54A ). Head : Dark, 1.1 times wider than long ( -Figure 54B +Figure 54B ). Clypeus flattened over majority of area, surface irregularly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–2 puncture diameters, underlying surface shagreened, weakly shining. Process of labrum rounded trapezoidal, slightly wider than long. Gena subequal to width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance ⅔ diameter of lateral ocellus. Face, gena, vertex, and scape with white hairs, none equalling length of scape. Antennae basally dark, A5–13 ventrally lightened by presence of grey scales; A3 slightly longer than A4, shorter than A4+5. @@ -210,10 +211,10 @@ Body length: Mesosoma structurally as in female ( -Figures 54C–D +Figures 54C–D ), covered with white hairs, hind tarsal claws with strong inner tooth. - + FIGURE 54. @@ -235,7 +236,7 @@ Terga structurally as in female, though tergal punctation present also on discs 54E). T6–7 with short whitish hairs overlying pygidial plate of T7. S8 short, apically broadened with truncate apex, ventrally covered by short whitish hairs. Genital capsule compact, gonocoxae produced into long, apically rounded teeth ( -Figure 54F +Figure 54F ). Gonostyli broadened and spatulate apically, inner margin raised, outer margin forming more or less rounded 90 o angle. Penis valves basally relatively broad, occupying ½ space between gonostyli, strongly narrowing apically. @@ -252,7 +253,7 @@ can be recognised as an Aciandrena due to the small body size, propodeal triangle not defined by lateral carinae ( -Figure 53E +Figure 53E ), surface covered by fine granular shagreen, with weak and obscure rugae basally, facial foveae narrower ventrally than dorsally, approaching a linear state and thus similar to the former Distandrena (= @@ -260,17 +261,17 @@ due to the small body size, propodeal triangle not defined by lateral carinae ( Micrandrena ) but the clypeus, supraclypeal and lower paraocular areas are free of striations, the yellow male clypeus ( -Figure 54B +Figure 54B ), the small and compact genital capsule with produced gonocoxal teeth ( -Figure 54F +Figure 54F ), and the female hind tibial claws lack an inner tooth. Within the Aciandrena , it can be recognised most clearly due to the finely but distinctly punctate terga (with the exception of T1), with punctures extending onto the tergal margins ( -Figures 53F +Figures 53F ; -54E +54E ). The only comparable Aciandrena @@ -315,9 +316,9 @@ with the head 1.1 times wider than long). This relatively elongate head in A. equus ( -Figures 53B +Figures 53B ; -54B +54B ) is useful for separation from similar Aciandrena diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC0E43210B83FD788CAB04C4.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC0E43210B83FD788CAB04C4.xml index b7b9e31a2a9..da491cd7cdc 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC0E43210B83FD788CAB04C4.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC0E43210B83FD788CAB04C4.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ -Figures 57A–F +Figures 57A–F . @@ -102,11 +103,11 @@ road to Body length: 9 mm ( -Figure 57A +Figure 57A ). Head: Dark, 1.2 times wider than long ( -Figure 57B +Figure 57B ). Clypeus weakly domed, densely punctate, punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameters, interspaces weakly shining. Process of labrum trapezoidal, 2 times wider than long, apical margin truncate, surface shining. Gena slightly exceeding width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance slightly exceeding diameter of lateral ocellus. Foveae dorsally narrow, occupying ⅓ of space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, equalling width of flagellum, narrowing further ventrally at level of antennal insertions; foveae filled with dark brown hairs. Face predominantly with long white hairs, black hairs restricted to inner margins of compound eyes; gena, vertex, and scape with long white hairs, longest hairs exceeding length of scape. Antennae dark, A3 exceeding A4+5, slightly shorter than A4+5+6. @@ -115,20 +116,20 @@ Dark, 1.2 times wider than long ( : Scutum shagreened, sculpture strongest anteriorly, becoming weaker medially, weakly shining, surface densely punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters except medially where punctures can be separated by up to 2 puncture diameters ( -Figure 57C +Figure 57C ). Scutellum more strongly shining, punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–2. puncture diameters. Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum microreticulate, dull. Dorsolateral parts of propodeum with granular microreticulation, weakly shining, surface overlain by fine network of raised rugosity. Propodeal triangle laterally delineated by fine carinae, internal surface with coarse granular microreticulation, basally with weakly raised rugae, propodeal triangle thus defined by change in surface sculpture ( -Figure 57D +Figure 57D ). Mesepisternum predominantly with long white plumose hairs, longest equalling length of scape, ventro-laterally with short black hairs. Scutum and scutellum with slightly shorter whitish hairs, with occasional intermixed black hairs. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, dorsal fringe strong, composed of long white strongly plumose hairs, internal surface covered with abundant white simple hairs. Legs dark, pubescence white to light brownish. Flocculus moderately developed, composed of white plumose hairs; femoral and tibial scopae composed of white simple hairs, tibial scopae dorsally with some dark brown hairs adjacent to basitibial plate. Hind tarsal claws with short inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation dark brown-orange, nervulus slightly antefurcal. Metasoma: Terga dark, apical rims narrowly lightened hyaline-yellow ( -Figure 57E +Figure 57E ). Tergal discs finely shagreened, shining, finely punctate, punctures separated by 2 puncture diameters, tergal margins with smaller, obscurer, and sparser punctures. Tergal discs with erect abundant but sparse white hairs, T2–4 with narrow apical hairband of white hairs, not obscuring underlying surface. Apical fringe of T5 medially dark brown, laterally white; hairs flanking pygidial plate dark brown ( -Figure 57F +Figure 57F ). Pygidial plate narrowly triangular, apex rounded, surface medially densely punctate, with slightly raised longitudinal bump, surface dull. - + FIGURE 57. @@ -161,9 +162,9 @@ can be placed in the subgenus Hedicke, 1933 due to the narrow facial foveae, occupying slightly less than one third of the space between the compound eye and a lateral ocellus, the foveae narrowing further ventrally, pronotum without humeral angle, A3 long (clearly exceeding A4+5), and the simple hairs of the tibial scopae (hairs not plumose). Due to the pale facial pubescence with black hairs along the inner margin of the compound eye ( -Figures 57A–B +Figures 57A–B ), white hairs comprising the majority of the tibial scopae, and white tergal hairbands ( -Figure 57E +Figure 57E ) as well as general black and white pubescence over the whole body, it is similar to A. boustaniae @@ -184,7 +185,7 @@ with the process of the labrum unusual, apically projecting, with deep median em A. boustaniae with foveae relatively broad, occupying over ½ the distance between the compound eye and a lateral ocellus). Genetically, the two species are separated by 13.39% ( -Figure 58 +Figure 58 ). It should be noted that A. boustaniae @@ -209,7 +210,7 @@ Warncke, 1975 . No action is taken at the present time. - + FIGURE 58. Phylogenetic tree (maximum likelihood) of @@ -226,7 +227,7 @@ based on the mitochondrial COI gene. Numbers above branches represent bootstrap Due to the tergal margins which are narrowly lightened hyaline-yellow ( -Figures 57E–F +Figures 57E–F ), the similar size, generally black and white pubescence, and presence in southern Iran , it is also superficially similar to @@ -237,33 +238,33 @@ Due to the tergal margins which are narrowly lightened hyaline-yellow ( ( Iran : Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad). However, it can be easily separated by the facial pubescence which is white medially with black hairs along the inner margins of the compound eyes ( -Figures 57A–B +Figures 57A–B ; in A. lustrum with facial pubescence almost entirely black, with only a few white hairs around the antennal insertions, -Figures 61A–B +Figures 61A–B ), by the predominantly white hairs of the tibial scopae (in A. lustrum with tibial scopae orange ventrally, dark brown dorsally), by the densely punctate clypeus, punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameters (clypeus with punctures slightly sparser, interspaces more clearly shining), by its mesepisternum with predominantly white hairs ( -Figure 57A +Figure 57A ; in A. lustrum with the mesepisternum with predominantly black hairs, -Figure 61A +Figure 61A ), and by the scutum which is weakly but distinctly punctate ( -Figure 57C +Figure 57C ; in A. lustrum with the scutum at most obscurely punctate, -Figure 61C +Figure 61C ). Genetically, the two species are separated by 14.21% (range 14.13–14.29%). diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC1243350B83FB398C13048D.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC1243350B83FB398C13048D.xml index dbbfb271301..62c3f821155 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC1243350B83FB398C13048D.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC1243350B83FB398C13048D.xml @@ -1,43 +1,44 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 @@ -177,14 +178,14 @@ is therefore described here for the first time. Body length: 9–10 mm ( -Figure 51A +Figure 51A ). Head: Dark, 1.2 times wider than long ( -Figure 51B +Figure 51B ). Clypeus weakly domed, densely punctate, punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameters, underlying surface shagreened, weakly shining. Process of labrum rounded trapezoidal, 3 times wider than long, surface smooth and shining. Gena broader than width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance equalling diameter of lateral ocellus. Foveae dorsally narrow, occupying ⅓ space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, narrowing further ventrally at level of antennal insertions; foveae filled with dark brown hairs. Face with almost entirely white hairs, with line of black hairs along inner margin of compound eyes. Gena with white hairs ventrally, becoming light yellow-brown dorsally and on vertex. Scape white-haired, with scattered black hairs; longest hairs of head slightly exceeding length of scape. Antennae dark, A5–12 ventrally slightly lightened by presence of grey scales; A3 exceeding A4+5, only slightly shorter than A4+5+6. - + FIGURE 50. @@ -217,10 +218,10 @@ male. E. Label details; F. Habitus, lateral view; G. Face, frontal view; H. Terg : Scutum shagreened, weakly shining, irregularly and shallowly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5-2 puncture diameters; scutellum with weaker shagreen, more strongly shining, puncture density similar ( -Figure 51C +Figure 51C ). Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum finely microreticulate, dull. Dorsolateral parts of propodeum also finely microreticulate,microreticulation overlain with sparse network of raised rugosity forming appearance of large shallow punctures with raised rims. Propodeal triangle narrow, internal surface with granular microreticulation, propodeal triangle thus defined by change in surface sculpture; triangle basally with short raised rugae. Mesepisternum with long finely and densely plumose whitish hairs, exceeding length of scape, hairs becoming shorter, light brown in colour, and less clearly plumose dorsally and on scutum and scutellum. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, dorsal fringe composed of long light brown plumose hairs, internal surface with scattered long light brown simple to weakly plumose hairs. Legs dark, pubescence brown. Flocculus moderately developed, composed of whitish plumose hairs; femoral scopae composed of whitish predominantly simple hairs, some minutely plumose; tibial scopae composed of orange hairs, predominantly simple, some weakly plumose. Hind tarsal claws with strong inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation orange, nervulus weakly antefurcal. - + FIGURE 51. @@ -238,7 +239,7 @@ female. A. Habitus, lateral view; B. Face, frontal view; C. Scutum, dorsal view; Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, tergal margins broadly lightened hyaline-brown ( -Figure 51D +Figure 51D ). Tergal discs weakly sculptured, weakly shining, clearly and deeply punctate, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters; tergal margins slightly but distinctly depressed, impunctate and shining. Terga with long, scattered, plumose light brown hairs, with weak concentration on T1–4 at junction between tergal discs and margins, forming sparse erect hairbands, not obscuring underlying surface. Apical fringe of T5 and hairs flanking pygidial plate dark brown; pygidial plate rounded triangular, surface flattened, with obscure dense punctures, punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameters, surface dull. @@ -253,7 +254,7 @@ can be placed in the subgenus Euandrena due to the narrow facial foveae, occupying slightly less than one third of the space between the compound eye and a lateral ocellus, the foveae narrowing further ventrally, pronotum without humeral angle, A3 long (clearly exceeding A4+5), and the simple hairs of the tibial scopae (hairs not plumose). Females can be recognised due to their tergal margins which are broad, slightly depressed, lightened hyaline-brown, and very weakly sculptured, thus shining ( -Figure 51D +Figure 51D ). This is similar to the state observed in A. angustior diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC17432B0B83FD318F3B0588.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC17432B0B83FD318F3B0588.xml index 44aaca58a02..7ff9ff14dec 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC17432B0B83FD318F3B0588.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC17432B0B83FD318F3B0588.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ -Figures 52A–F +Figures 52A–F . @@ -92,13 +93,13 @@ Description: Female: Body length: 6.5 mm ( -Figure 52A +Figure 52A ). Head: Dark, 1.1 times wider than long ( -Figure 52B +Figure 52B ). Clypeus domed, smooth and shining over its entire surface, irregularly punctate with large to small punctures, punctures separated by 1–3 puncture diameters ( -Figure 52C +Figure 52C ). Process of labrum trapezoidal-rectangular, slightly wider than long, apical margin straight. Gena slightly narrower than width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance subequal to diameter of lateral ocellus. Foveae dorsally broad, occupying ⅔ of space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, ventrally narrowing to narrower than width of flagellum at level of antennal insertions; foveae filled with white hairs. Face, gena, vertex, and scape with short white hairs, none equalling length of scape. Scape dark, A2–12 ventrally and dorsally extensively lightened bright orange; A3 exceeding A4, slightly shorter than A4+5, A4 and A5 sub-square, shorter than long, A6–12 quadrate. @@ -107,15 +108,15 @@ Dark, 1.1 times wider than long ( : Scutum and scutellum smooth and shining, with fine shagreen limited to anterior margin of scutum; scutum irregularly punctate, punctures variable, separated by 0.5–2 puncture, scutellum more irregularly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–3 puncture diameters ( -Figure 52D +Figure 52D ). Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum and dorsolateral parts of propodeum with fine granular microreticulation, weakly shining; propodeal triangle weakly defined, internal surface covered with fine granular shagreen, weakly shining, with weak and obscure rugae basally ( -Figure 52E +Figure 52E ). Mesepisternum with long white hairs, none equalling length of scape, scutum and scutellum with shorter scattered semi-squamous hairs, most concentrated laterally. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, weakly formed, dorsal fringe composed of whitish-yellowish plumose hairs, internal surface with scattered simple white hairs. Legs basally brownish, tarsi and hind tibiae lightened orange, pubescence light brown. Flocculus incomplete, composed of light brownish plumose hairs; femoral and tibial scopae composed of simple yellowish hairs. Hind tarsal claws without inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation orange, nervulus interstitial to marginally slightly antefurcal. Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, tergal margins broadly lightened reddish-brown ( -Figure 52F +Figure 52F ). Tergal discs finely shagreened to microreticulate, weakly shining, more or less impunctate, with obscure fine and scattered punctures. T2–4 apically with dense white hairbands, broadly interrupted on T2, complete on T3–4, obscuring underlying surface.Apical fringe of T5 and hairs flanking pygidial plate whitish-golden. Pygidial plate large, rounded triangular, apex slightly domed, impunctate, basal half with surface densely but shallowly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameters, interspaces weakly shining. @@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ Tergal discs dark, tergal margins broadly lightened reddish-brown ( Unknown. - + FIGURE 52. @@ -225,7 +226,7 @@ Morphological separation can be made by the interstitial nervulus (antefurcal in A. palmyriae ), smooth and shining scutum and scutellum ( -Figure 52D +Figure 52D ; shagreened in A. pavonia @@ -235,9 +236,9 @@ Morphological separation can be made by the interstitial nervulus (antefurcal in A. xera ), head only 1.1 times wider than long ( -Figure 52B +Figure 52B ; -1.2 +1.2 times wider than long in A. pellucida @@ -283,7 +284,7 @@ punctures of scutum sparser, separated by 2–3 puncture diameters), scutellum m A. pellucida scutellum more regularly punctate, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters), T2–4 with thick apical hairbands of white hairs ( -Figure 52F +Figure 52F ; broadly interrupted on T2) that obscure the underlying surface (in A. pellucida diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC1B433F0B83FD568F7A0700.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC1B433F0B83FD568F7A0700.xml index 75129e0b3eb..99d540af2b7 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC1B433F0B83FD568F7A0700.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC1B433F0B83FD568F7A0700.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -74,7 +75,7 @@ Strand, 1915: 72 , DEI, lectotype by present designation] ( -Figures 44A–D +Figures 44A–D ) Andrena taraxaci @@ -90,7 +91,7 @@ ssp. , KUEC, not examined] - + FIGURE 44. @@ -138,7 +139,7 @@ concept (e.g. Xu & Tadauchi 1998; 2002). Examination of the type material ( -Figure 44 +Figure 44 ; two females , one here designated as a @@ -148,9 +149,9 @@ Examination of the type material ( and Japan ( -Figures 45A; C +Figures 45A; C ; -46A; C; E +46A; C; E ) shows that A. orienticola @@ -168,33 +169,33 @@ Giraud, 1861 Andrena orienticola has the female scutum medially becoming polished and shining ( -Figure 45A +Figure 45A ; uniformly dull in A. taraxaci , -Figure 45B +Figure 45B ), the tergal discs of both females and males are very weakly shagreened, almost smooth and shining ( -Figures 45C +Figures 45C ; -46A +46A ; in A. taraxaci with the terga strongly microreticulate, dull to weakly shining, -Figures 45D +Figures 45D ; -46B +46B ), and in direct comparison the male genital capsule is shorter and more compact, with shorter gonocoxal teeth, and with S8 comparatively narrower and with a rounded apex ( -Figures 46C; E +Figures 46C; E ; in A. taraxaci with the genital capsule more elongate, with more elongate gonocoxal teeth, and with S8 comparatively broader with apex truncate, -Figures 46D; F +Figures 46D; F ). True A. taraxaci @@ -235,7 +236,7 @@ Proshchalykin , further supporting their distinct statuses. - + FIGURE 45. diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC1C43330B83FF148C70075C.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC1C43330B83FF148C70075C.xml index 925892a59ea..f6c75d5ee82 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC1C43330B83FF148C70075C.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC1C43330B83FF148C70075C.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -102,7 +103,7 @@ ssp. was later described from the island of Crete on the basis of its comparatively smooth and shiny scutum ( -Figure 47A +Figure 47A ), the only character given by Warncke in his one sentence description and diagnosis. Examination of material from across the known range of A. rugothorace @@ -115,7 +116,7 @@ to the Levant, s. str. Specimens always have the scutum with strong granular microreticulation, weakly shining, with punctures with slightly raised rims ( -Figures 47C; E +Figures 47C; E ), hence prompting the name rugothorace @@ -135,7 +136,7 @@ from eastern ( Beqaa valley). These showed minimal differentiation ( -Figure 37 +Figure 37 ); including three sequences from Israel ( @@ -184,7 +185,7 @@ ssp. pelagica has the scutum finely shagreened, more brightly shining, punctures without slightly raised margins, the scutum thus appearing smoother and less coarse ( -Figure 47A +Figure 47A ). Moreover, there is an additional character not mentioned by Warncke which is that the propodeal triangle of A. rugothorace @@ -192,14 +193,14 @@ ssp. pelagica is barely indicated laterally by carinae, these reduced and present only basally, medially with basal rugae that are strongly produced, irregular and comparatively widely spaced, this wide spacing contributing to the overall propodeal triangle being comparatively brightly shining ( -Figure 47B +Figure 47B ). In contrast, in A. rugothorace s. str. the propodeal triangle is laterally delineated by fine carinae, medially with a finer network of basal rugae, these less strongly produced and comparatively closely spaced, contributing to a propodeal triangle that is more dull, only weakly shining ( -Figures 47D; F +Figures 47D; F ). @@ -215,14 +216,14 @@ is almost identical to that of s. str. , but can be recognised by its genital capsule where the gonostyli are basally slightly constricted, with the inner and outer margins not parallel, the outer margin with a slight emargination, and the inner margin with a slightly produced bump ( -Figure 48E +Figure 48E ; in A. rugothorace s. str. with the inner and outer margins more or less parallel, the outer margin evenly rounded from the gonocoxae to its apex, -Figure 48F +Figure 48F ), and the apexes of the gonostyli are more tapered and elongate, giving the overall capsule a more feeble and pointed appearance (in A. rugothorace @@ -246,11 +247,11 @@ is raised to species status. It is endemic to the island of Body length: 6 mm ( -Figure 48A +Figure 48A ). Head: Dark, 1.35 times wider than long ( -Figure 48B +Figure 48B ). Clypeus weakly domed, surface with weakly raised irregular latitudinal wrinkles, surface punctate between wrinkles, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters; underlying surface shagreened, weakly shining. Process of labrum rounded rectangular, 2 times wider than long, surface shining. Gena subequal to width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance subequal to diameter of lateral ocellus. Face, gena, vertex, and scape with long whitish hairs, none equalling length of scape. Antennae dark, A3 exceeding A4, shorter than A4+5; A4 extremely short, clearly 2 times wider than long, A5 quadrate, A6–13 progressively becoming slightly longer. @@ -259,10 +260,10 @@ Dark, 1.35 times wider than long ( : Scutum and scutellum uniformly microreticulate, weakly shining, surface irregularly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters ( -Figure 48C +Figure 48C ). Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum with granular microreticulation, weakly shining. Propodeum with granular microreticulation, sculpture overlain by sparse network of raised rugosity, surface weakly shining. Propodeal triangle lacking lateral carinae, internal surface with longitudinal raised rugae, covering entire surface of triangle, interspaces shining. Mesepisternum and propodeum with long white plumose hairs, hairs subequal to length of scape, hairs becoming shorter and light brown on scutum and scutellum. Legs dark, apical tarsal segments lightened orange-brown. Hind tarsal claws with inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation orange-brown, nervulus interstitial. - + FIGURE 47. @@ -299,13 +300,13 @@ female from Lebanon. E. Scutum, dorsal view; F. Propodeum, dorsal view. Metasoma: Terga dark, marginal areas lightened dark brown ( -Figure 48D +Figure 48D ).Tergal discs microreticulate, sculpture becoming progressively weaker on apical tergal segments, more or less impunctate, punctures disappearing into underlying sculpture, surface weakly shining. Tergal discs with scattered short white hairs, T2–3 laterally with weak widely interrupted apical hair fringes. T6–7 with long whitish hairs overlying pygidial plate of T7. S8 columnar, apically rounded, ventral surface with fan of short orange-brown hairs. Genital capsule elongate, gonocoxae produced into pointed apical teeth, gonostyli basally slightly constricted, elongate, apical part long and spatulate, inner margin bluntly raised ( -Figure 48E +Figure 48E ). Penis valves basally slightly broadened, lateral margins with raised rims, narrowing apically, occupying ⅓ space between gonostyli. - + FIGURE 48. diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC2743FB0B83F9918C1800A0.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC2743FB0B83F9918C1800A0.xml index 7caf712d4b3..f19a9581d20 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC2743FB0B83F9918C1800A0.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC2743FB0B83F9918C1800A0.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ -Figures 78A–G +Figures 78A–G . @@ -138,18 +139,18 @@ SE Chatan-Bulag Body length: 7–9 mm ( -Figure 78A +Figure 78A ). Head: Dark, 1.3 times wider than long ( -Figure 78B +Figure 78B ). Clypeus domed, polished and shining, irregularly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters over majority of disc, slightly sparser medially where irregular almost impunctate longitudinal mid-line present. Process of labrum trapezoidal, 2 times wider than long, apical margin truncate to very weakly emarginate ( -Figure 78C +Figure 78C ). Gena subequal to width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance 1.5 times diameter of lateral ocellus. Frons with weak longitudinal striations, punctate between striations, punctures separated by 1 puncture diameter, surface dull. Vertex posterolateral to lateral ocelli with shining, impunctate, roughly triangular spaces. Foveae dorsally broad, occupying ¾ space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, narrowing ventrally, slightly exceeding lower level of antennal insertions; foveae filled with light brown hairs ( -Figure 78D +Figure 78D ). Face, gena, scape with short white hairs, becoming light golden-brown on vertex. Antennae basally dark, A3 apically, A4–12 ventrally lightened by presence of orange scales; A3 exceeding A4, shorter than A4+5. - + FIGURE 78. @@ -169,17 +170,17 @@ female. A. Habitus, lateral view; B. Face, frontal view; C. Process of labrum, v : Scutum and scutellum smooth and shining, irregularly punctate, scutum with punctures typically separated by 0.5–2 puncture diameters, scutellum with punctures sparse medially, separated by up to 4 puncture diameters ( -Figure 78E +Figure 78E ). Pronotum with weak humeral angle. Mesepisternum smooth and shining, punctate, punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameters. Dorsolateral parts of propodeum microreticulate, sculpture overlain by weak network of raised rugosity, surface dull. Propodeal triangle laterally unclearly delineated by weak carinae, surface covered with network of raised rugosity, barely differentiated from dorsolateral parts of propodeum ( -Figure 78F +Figure 78F ). Mesepisternum with moderately long plumose whitish to light brownish hairs, not equalling length of scape. Scutum and scutellum with shorter, slightly more strongly plumose light brown hairs, hairs sub-squamous, not obscuring underlying surface. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, dorsal fringe composed of white weakly plumose hairs, internal surface with regular long white simple hairs. Legs brown, apical tarsal segments lightened orange, pubescence whitish to light brownish. Flocculus complete, composed of whitish plumose hairs; femoral and tibial scopae composed of simple white hairs. Hind tarsal claws with inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation light yellow-orange, nervulus interstitial. Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, marginal areas lightened reddish hyaline-yellow ( -Figure 78G +Figure 78G ). Tergal discs punctate, disc of T1 medially with punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters, laterally and on declivity with punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters, discs of T2–4 with punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameters; interspaces polished and shining. Marginal areas of T2–4 depressed, T1–4 with strong and dense apical whitish to yellowish hairbands, covering entire marginal area and extending onto following tergal discs, hairbands complete, obscuring underlying surface. Apical fringe and hairs flanking pygidial plate whitish to golden. Pygidial plate rounded triangular, surface medially slightly humped, dull ( -Figure 78F +Figure 78F ). @@ -198,10 +199,10 @@ is also challenging to place in a subgenus; it is very similar to A. concisura as it presents a domed shining clypeus, impunctate and shining triangular areas adjacent to the lateral ocelli ( -Figure 78D +Figure 78D ), the pronotum with a weak humeral angle, the mesepisternum shiny and punctate, tergal discs T2–4 very densely punctate ( -Figure 78G; T -1 +Figure 78G; T +1 with sparse punctures), marginal areas strongly depressed and entirely covered with dense complete hairbands, and the lack of other distinctive characters (such as a broadened hind tibial spur, plumose hairs, or spines on the posterior face of the hind femorae). There are no other similar known Central Asian Andrena @@ -219,33 +220,33 @@ due to the broader head that is 1.3 times wider than long (in A. concisura with the head 1.1 times wider than long), the trapezoidal process of the labrum ( -Figure 78C +Figure 78C ; in A. concisura with the process of the labrum triangular, -Figure 78C +Figure 78C ), the weakly longitudinally striate and dull frons (in A. concisura with the frons lacking striations, smooth and shining), the moderately short plumose hairs of the scutum and scutellum ( -Figure 78E +Figure 78E , in A. concisura with the scutal hairs extremely short and squamous, -Figure 77E +Figure 77E ), and the apically rounded pygidial plate ( -Figure 78H +Figure 78H ; in A. concisura with the pygidial plate deeply and broadly emarginate, -Figure 77H +Figure 77H ). diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC2843080B83FDA18D5701F8.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC2843080B83FDA18D5701F8.xml index 350c845b129..fc07b267f54 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC2843080B83FDA18D5701F8.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC2843080B83FDA18D5701F8.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,9 +59,9 @@ -Figures 71A–C; E–G +Figures 71A–C; E–G ; -72A–C; E–G +72A–C; E–G . @@ -143,13 +144,13 @@ Body length: 7.5– 8 mm ( -Figure 71A +Figure 71A ). Head: Dark, 1.3 times wider than long ( -Figure 71B +Figure 71B ). Clypeus weakly domed, shallowly but densely punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters, narrow impunctate longitudinal mid-line present; underlying surface with granular shagreen over basal ¾, dull, narrowly becoming smooth and shining along apical margin ( -Figure 71C +Figure 71C ). Process of labrum trapezoidal, 2 times wider than long, apical margin straight to weakly emarginate, surface covered with latitudinal striations, weakly shining. Gena slightly exceeding width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance slightly exceeding diameter of lateral ocellus. Foveae broad, dorsally occupying almost entire space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, ventrally narrowing slightly to 60% of dorsal width at level just below antennal insertions; foveae filled with dense whitish hairs, obscuring underlying surface. Face, gena, vertex, and scape covered with abundant white hairs, longest not equalling length of scape. Antennae basally dark, A5–12 lightened ventrally by presence of orange scales; A3 exceeding A4, slightly shorter than A4+5. @@ -158,18 +159,18 @@ Dark, 1.3 times wider than long ( : Scutum and scutellum with dense granular shagreen, weakly shining, surface regularly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters. Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum with fine granular shagreen, weakly shining, with scattered and obscure punctures. Dorsolateral parts of propodeum with dense granular microreticulation, dull; propodeal triangle defined laterally by fine but distinct carinae, internal surface with dense granular microreticulation overlain by irregular pattern of weakly raised carinae, overall surface dull ( -Figure 71E +Figure 71E ). Mesepisternum with long white hairs, none equalling length of scape, scutum and scutellum with short densely plumose and sub-squamous light brown hairs, longest laterally, becoming shorter medially. Propodeal corbicula well-developed, complete, with both dorsal and anterior fringes, composed of long plumose light brownish hairs, internal surface hairless. Legs dark, hind tibiae lightened orange, pubescence light brown; hind tibiae broadened dorsally, apically 2 times basal width. Flocculus moderately developed, well-developed but not complete, composed of abundant white plumose hairs; femoral and tibial scopae composed of white simple hairs ( -Figure 71F +Figure 71F ). Tibial scopae composed of relatively long hairs, length of hairs clearly exceeding diameter of lateral ocellus. Hind tarsal claws with inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation orange, nervulus slightly antefurcal. Metasoma: Tergal discs predominantly dark, marginal areas broadly lightened hyaline orange-brown, colouration extending onto apexes of tergal discs ( -Figure 71G +Figure 71G ). Tergal discs finely shagreened, weakly shining, densely but shallowly and obscurely punctate, punctures separated by 1 puncture diameter. Discs of T2–4 covered with short tightly plumose hairs, in fresh specimens forming a velvety layer that partially obscures the underlying surface; marginal areas of T1–4 with dense apical hairbands of similar hairs, very widely interrupted on T1, partially interrupted on T2, complete on T3–4, in fresh individuals obscuring underlying surface. Apical fringe of T5 and hairs flanking pygidial plate golden-whitish. Pygidial plate rounded triangular, internal surface shallowly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameters, interspaces weakly shining. - + FIGURE 71. @@ -199,15 +200,15 @@ female. D. Clypeus detail, frontal view; H. Terga, dorsal view. Body length: 6.5– 7 mm ( -Figure 72A +Figure 72A ). Head: Dark, 1.3 times wider than long ( -Figure 72B +Figure 72B ). Clypeus weakly domed, densely punctate, punctures separated by 1 puncture diameter with exception of longitudinal impunctate mid-line, underlying surface smooth and shining. Process of labrum roughly trapezoidal, 2 times wider than long, anterior margin broadly emarginate. Gena equalling width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance equalling diameter of lateral ocellus. Face, gena, vertex, and scape with long white hairs, none equalling length of scape. Antennae basally dark, A4–13 ventrally lightened by presence of grey-brown scales; A3 slightly exceeding A 4 in length ( -Figure 72C +Figure 72C ). @@ -216,15 +217,15 @@ length ( : Scutum and scutellum irregularly shagreened, laterally weakly shining, sculpture becoming weaker medially, here almost polished and shining, irregularly punctate, laterally punctures separated by 1 puncture diameter, medially by 2–3 puncture diameters ( -Figure 72E +Figure 72E ). Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum with fine granular shagreen, weakly shining. Dorsolateral parts of propodeum coarsely microreticulate, with weakly raised rugae, propodeal triangle defined by fine lateral carinae, internal surface less strongly sculptured than remaining propodeum. Mesepisternum with long white hairs, longest equalling length of scape, scutum with shorter sparse and scattered white hairs. Legs dark, tarsal segments progressively lightened orange, pubescence whitish. Hind tarsal claws with inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation orange, nervulus antefurcal. Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, marginal areas slightly depressed, broadly lightened hyaline whitish-yellow ( -Figure 72F +Figure 72F ). Tergal discs basally shagreened, more or less shining, sculpture becoming weaker on marginal areas, here more strongly shining, underlying surface punctate, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters. Tergal discs with scattered erect white hairs, T2–4 with apical white hairbands, complete in fresh specimens and obscuring the underlying surface. S8 more or less columnar, apex broadened. Genital capsule slightly elongate, gonocoxae apically weakly produced into broad, rounded teeth, gonostyli with apical part weakly broadened and flattened, internal margin straight and weakly but distinctly raised ( -Figure 72G +Figure 72G ). Penis valves narrow, medially slightly constricted and narrowing apically, basally occupying ⅓ of space between gonostyli. @@ -264,25 +265,25 @@ Warncke, 1966 Andrena michezi can be recognised by the presence of dense patches of short hairs at the base of T2–4, forming a velvety pile in addition to the apical hairbands ( -Figure 71G +Figure 71G ; in A. melba with tergal discs essentially without such hairs, -Figure 71H +Figure 71H ), by the shagreened and weakly shining tergal discs with dense but obscure punctures (in A. melba with terga comparatively more shining, with more clearly distinct punctation, and by the clypeus which is sculptured over its basal ¾, shiny only along the apical margin of the clypeus, with predominantly dull granular shagreen and with a narrow and dull impunctate longitudinal mid-line approximately as wide as 2 puncture diameters ( -Figure 71C +Figure 71C ; in A. melba with the clypeus shining over the majority of its area, with a broader and shinier impunctate longitudinal mid-line approximately as wide as 4 puncture diameters, -Figure 71D +Figure 71D ). The presence of this pile of velvety hairs on the tergal discs gives A. michezi @@ -312,25 +313,25 @@ In the male sex, recognition is more challenging, as is always the case for the Andrena michezi can be separated by the antennal ratios, with A3 slightly longer than A4 ( -Figure 72C +Figure 72C ; in A. melba with A3 approximately 60% as long as A4, -Figure 72D +Figure 72D ), by the scutum which is anteriorly and laterally shagreened (in A. melba with the scutum entirely polished and shining), and by the more elongate genital capsule with the inner margin of the gonostyli more pronounced ( -Figure 72G +Figure 72G ; in A. melba with the genital capsule more compact, without a clearly raised inner margin of the gonostyli, -Figure 72H +Figure 72H ). diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC3043170B83FD1D8B4D00B8.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC3043170B83FD1D8B4D00B8.xml index 62bddd28d06..299dfb65e48 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC3043170B83FD1D8B4D00B8.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC3043170B83FD1D8B4D00B8.xml @@ -1,43 +1,44 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 @@ -58,9 +59,9 @@ -Figures 66A–C; E–F +Figures 66A–C; E–F ; -67A–E; G +67A–E; G . @@ -364,11 +365,11 @@ N Ceylanpinar Description: Female: Body length: 6–6.5 mm ( -Figure 66A +Figure 66A ). Head: Dark, 1.2 times wider than long ( -Figure 66C +Figure 66C ). Clypeus domed, irregularly and shallowly but clearly punctate, punctures separated by 1–3 puncture diameters, underlying surface with regular granular shagreen, weakly shining. Process of labrum trapezoidal, 2 times wider than long, apical margin truncate, surface shining. Gena subequal to width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance ⅔ diameter of lateral ocellus. Foveae dorsally narrow, occupying ⅓ space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, slightly narrower than width of flagellum, ventrally narrowing slightly at level of antennal insertions; foveae filled with light brown hairs. Face, gena, vertex, and scape covered with short to moderately long whitish hairs, none equalling length of scape. Antennae basally dark, A5–12 ventrally lightened by presence of orange scales. A3 exceeding A4, slightly shorter than A4+5. @@ -377,12 +378,12 @@ Dark, 1.2 times wider than long ( : Scutum and scutellum with fine regular granular shagreen, moderately shining, surface irregularly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–2 puncture diameters, sparsest medially ( -Figure 66B +Figure 66B ). Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum with fine granular shagreen, weakly shining. Dorsolateral parts of propodeum with granular microreticulation, sculpture overlain by weak network of raised rugosity, surface weakly shining. Propodeal triangle broad, lacking lateral carinae, internal surface with coarse granular microreticulation, weakly shining, basally with network of short raised rugae; propodeal triangle thus defined by change in surface sculpture ( -Figure 66E +Figure 66E ). Mesepisternum with moderately long white hairs, becoming shorter on scutum and scutellum, here light brown, scattered, densely plumose and sub-squamous. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, weakly produced, dorsal fringe composed of plumose white hairs, internal surface with occasional white hairs. Legs dark, basitarsi reddish brown, remaining tarsal segments lightened orange, pubescence whitish to light brown. Flocculus incomplete, composed of plumose white hairs; femoral and tibial scopae composed of simple white hairs. Hind tarsal claws with small inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation orange, nervulus strongly antefurcal. - + FIGURE 66. @@ -410,10 +411,10 @@ female. D. Face, frontal view. Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, apical margins broadly lightened hyaline white-orange ( -Figure 66F +Figure 66F ). Tergal discs with regular granular microreticulation, sculpture strongest basally, becoming weaker on apical terga, surface weakly shining, impunctate. T2–4 with apical hairbands, hairbands long, exceeding length of terga, composed of white hairs, obscuring underlying surface; hairbands more or less complete T2–4. Apical fringe of T5 and hairs flanking pygidial plate golden-white. Pygidial plate triangular with narrowly rounded apex, surface predominantly flattened with slight subapical bulge, with obscure fine shagreen, dull. - + FIGURE 67. @@ -441,11 +442,11 @@ male. F. S8, ventral view; H. Genital capsule, dorsal view. Male: Body length: 4.5–5.5 mm ( -Figure 67A +Figure 67A ). Head: Dark, 1.25 times wider than long ( -Figure 67B +Figure 67B ). Clypeus weakly domed, almost entirely yellow-marked with exception of two small triangular marks medially; underlying surface smooth and shiny, superficially punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters. Process of labrum trapezoidal, 2 times wider than long, anterior margin truncate, humped, medially emarginate. Gena subequal to width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance ½ diameter of lateral ocellus. Face, gena, vertex, and scape with long white hairs, longest exceeding length of scape.Antennae basally dark, A4–13 extensively lightened ventrally be presence of orange scales; A3 exceeding A4, shorter than A4+5, A4 subquadrate, wider than long, A5–13 quadrate to slightly longer than wide. @@ -455,17 +456,17 @@ Dark, 1.25 times wider than long ( Mesosoma structurally as in female ( -Figure 67C +Figure 67C ), covered with long white hairs. Metasoma: Terga structurally as in female ( -Figure 67D +Figure 67D ). T1–4 apically with dense white hairbands, complete in fresh individuals, obscuring underlying surface. T6–7 with long white hairs overlying pygidial plate of T7. S8 columnar, more or less parallel-sided, apex truncate, ventral surface with fan of short light brown hairs ( -Figure 67E +Figure 67E ). Genital capsule long, gonocoxae apically produced into weak rounded points, gonostyli elongate, apical portion long, flattened, and spatulate, inner margin raised, weakly blade-like ( -Figure 67G +Figure 67G ). Penis valves basally broad, occupying ½ space between gonostyli, evenly tapering apically. @@ -480,7 +481,7 @@ can be recognised as a Graecandrena due to its small body size, predominantly dark integument, propodeal triangle lacking lateral carinae, internal surface with granular microreticulation and weak but clearly present raised rugae basally, female hind tarsal claws with small inner tooth, and female foveae narrow, but not strongly narrowing ventrally or becoming linear. The male clypeus is yellow ( -Figure 67B +Figure 67B ) which is unusual for the subgenus, but the combination of yellow male clypeus, large elongate genital capsule, female clypeus domed, evenly rounded, and punctate place it close to A. volka @@ -504,19 +505,19 @@ As females are similar, diagnosis is best made to males first. Male A. volkoides can be recognised by the antennae which have A4–13 strongly and extensively lightened orange ventrally ( -Figure 67B +Figure 67B ; in A. volka with the antennae ventrally dark brown at most), S8 narrow and columnar, with the apex only very slightly broadened if at all ( -Figure 67E +Figure 67E ; in A. volka with S8 strongly broadened apically, triangular, clearly more than 2 times broader apically than basally, -Figure 67F +Figure 67F ), and with the tergal margins broadly lightened hyaline-white, with dense apical hairbands that (in fresh specimens) are more or less as wide as the tergal margins (in A. volka @@ -533,13 +534,13 @@ material as some structural differences are subtle. Female A. volkoides can be separated by the shape of the head which in frontal view has the outer margin of the compound eyes more strongly converging ventrally ( -Figure 66C +Figure 66C ; in A. volka comparatively more rounded, -Figure 66D +Figure 66D ), by the supraclypeal area which is almost flattened (in A. volka diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC35430A0B83F8818C700458.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC35430A0B83F8818C700458.xml index 5189bdbddf0..26f949df56a 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC35430A0B83F8818C700458.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC35430A0B83F8818C700458.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,11 +59,11 @@ -Figures 68A–C; E +Figures 68A–C; E ; -69A; C; E +69A; C; E ; -70A–C; E; G +70A–C; E; G . @@ -98,7 +99,7 @@ W. . - + FIGURE 68. @@ -243,15 +244,15 @@ same information as Body length: 4.5– 5 mm ( -Figure 68A +Figure 68A ). Head: Dark, 1.25 times wider than long ( -Figure 68B +Figure 68B ). Clypeus domed, densely but weakly punctate, punctures shallow, separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters, disappearing into underlying granular microreticulation, surface dull to weakly shining ( -Figure 68C +Figure 68C ). Process of labrum narrowly rounded triangular, as long as broad, surface dull. Gena equalling width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance ½ diameter of lateral ocellus. Frons with very weak microsculpture, more or less polished and shining, sparsely punctate, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters ( -Figure 68E +Figure 68E ). Foveae moderately broad, occupying ⅓ space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, uniformly wide; foveae filled with whitish hairs. Face, gena, vertex, and scape covered with short whitish hairs. Antennae dark, A3 exceeding A4, shorter than A4+5. @@ -260,15 +261,15 @@ Dark, 1.25 times wider than long ( : Scutum and scutellum finely shagreened, broadly shining, irregularly punctate, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters ( -Figure 69A +Figure 69A ). Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum with fine granular microreticulation, dull to weakly shining. Dorsolateral parts of propodeum finely shagreened, weakly shining; propodeal triangle with slightly coarser granular shagreen, shining, propodeal triangle thus defined by change in surface sculpture ( -Figure 69C +Figure 69C ). Mesepisternum with moderately long densely plumose white hairs, scutum and scutellum with shorter, sparser, and less densely plumose white hairs. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, dorsal fringe composed of white plumose hairs, internal surface with long white hairs. Legs basally dark, tibiae and tarsi dark brown, pubescence whitish. Flocculus incomplete, composed of white plumose hairs; femoral and tibial scopae composed of whitish simple hairs. Hind tarsal claws with small inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation dark brown, nervulus antefurcal. Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, tergal margins narrowly lightened hyaline brown ( -Figure 69E +Figure 69E ). Tergal discs with granular microreticulation, sculpture strongest basally, dull, becoming weaker apically, here weakly shining; terga impunctate. Tergal discs with scattered very short obscure hairs, T2–4 laterally with dense and narrow apical fringes of white hairs, obscuring underlying surface. Apical fringe of T5 laterally white, medially brown, hairs flanking pygidial plate brown. Pygidial plate narrowly triangular, surface flattened, dull. @@ -276,11 +277,11 @@ Tergal discs dark, tergal margins narrowly lightened hyaline brown ( Body length: 4–5 mm ( -Figure 70A +Figure 70A ). Head: Dark, 1.3 times wider than long ( -Figure 70B +Figure 70B ). Clypeus domed, densely but weakly punctate, punctures shallow, separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters, disappearing into underlying granular microreticulation, surface dull to weakly shining. Process of labrum trapezoidal, 2 times wider than long. Gena equalling width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance ⅔ diameter of lateral ocellus. Head covered with moderately long white hairs, none equalling length of scape. Antennae basally dark, A5–13 ventrally lightened by presence of grey scales; A3 equalling A4, A4 quadrate, A5–13 all slightly longer than wide. @@ -289,7 +290,7 @@ Dark, 1.3 times wider than long ( : Scutum and scutellum finely shagreened, weakly shining irregularly punctate, punctures separated by 1–3 puncture diameters ( -Figure 70C +Figure 70C ). Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum and propodeum structurally as in female. Mesosoma covered with long white hairs. Legs basally dark, becoming brown apically, pubescence whitish. Hind tarsal claws with inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation dark brown, nervulus antefurcal. @@ -297,9 +298,9 @@ covered with long white hairs. Legs basally dark, becoming brown apically, pubes Metasoma: Terga structurally as in female ( -Figure 70E +Figure 70E ). Tergal discs with scattered very short obscure hairs, T2–4 laterally with dense and narrow apical fringes of white hairs, obscuring underlying surface. T6–7 with whitish hairs overlying pygidial plate of T7. S8 more or less columnar, apex truncate, ventral surface densely covered by fan of brown hairs. Genital capsule elongate, gonocoxae produced into rounded points, gonostyli elongate, flattened over majority of their surface, spatulate, outer margin with slight rounded bump in apical ⅓ ( -Figure 70G +Figure 70G ). Penis valves basally moderately broad, occupying ½ space between gonostyli, regularly tapering apically. @@ -327,11 +328,11 @@ Pisanty . 2022b ) due to the small body size, propodeal triangle with uniform granular shagreen, without raised carinae or rugae ( -Figure 69C +Figure 69C ), hind tarsal claw with an inner tooth, and facial foveae relatively narrow (occupying <½ of the space between the compound eye and lateral ocellus, -Figure 68E +Figure 68E ) but of a uniform width dorsally and ventrally. Due to the closely punctate clypeus and the distinctive elongate genital capsule ( -Figure 70G +Figure 70G ), it is closest to A. @@ -361,37 +362,37 @@ Although the two genital capsules are very similar, the two species can be separ A. lediveleci can be recognised due to the comparatively weakly punctate clypeus, punctures disappearing into underlying sculpture ( -Figure 68C +Figure 68C ; in A. sandanskia with the clypeus clearly punctate, -Figure 68D +Figure 68D ), the weakly and comparatively more sparsely punctate frons, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters, not strongly contrasting the weakly shining underlying surface ( -Figure 68E +Figure 68E ; in A. sandanskia with the frons densely and clearly punctate, punctures separated by 1 puncture diameters, clearly contrasting the dull underlying surface, -Figure 68F +Figure 68F ), the finely sculptured scutum which is broadly shining and comparatively sparsely punctate, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters ( -Figure 69A +Figure 69A ; in A. sandanskia with the scutum with uniform granular shagreen, dull to weakly shining, more densely punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters, -Figure 69B +Figure 69B ), the terga which have clear dense apical hair fringes laterally on T2–4 ( -Figure 69E +Figure 69E ; in A. sandanskia with only sparse hairs on the tergal margins, not forming dense hairbands, -Figure 69F +Figure 69F ), and the slightly smaller body size of 4.5– 5 mm (in @@ -402,7 +403,7 @@ typically 5–6 mm ). - + FIGURE 69. @@ -427,7 +428,7 @@ female. A. Scutum, dorsal view; C. Propodeum, dorsal view; E. Terga, dorsal view female. B. Scutum, dorsal view; D. Propodeum, dorsal view; F. Terga, dorsal view. - + FIGURE 70. @@ -454,21 +455,21 @@ male. D. Scutum, dorsal view; F. Terga, dorsal view; H. Genital capsule, dorsal Males can be recognised by the same characters, specifically the less strongly sculptured scutum (compare -Figures 70C–D +Figures 70C–D ), the terga with narrow hair fringes laterally on T2–4 (compare -Figures 70E–F +Figures 70E–F ), and the slightly smaller body size of 4–4.5 mm (in A. sandanskia typically 5–5.5 mm). The genital capsule also has the outer margin of the gonostyli comparatively straight ( -Figure 70G +Figure 70G ), whereas in A. sandanskia the outer margin is slightly concave ( -Figure 70H +Figure 70H ). diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC39431F0B83FD798F7D0700.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC39431F0B83FD798F7D0700.xml index 45d9a24e6b7..d3350eecf93 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC39431F0B83FD798F7D0700.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC39431F0B83FD798F7D0700.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,9 +59,9 @@ -Figures 62A–C; E–F +Figures 62A–C; E–F ; -63A–C; E; G +63A–C; E; G . @@ -190,15 +191,15 @@ Body length: 8–9 mm ( -Figure 62A +Figure 62A ). Head: Dark, 1.05 times longer than wide ( -Figure 62B +Figure 62B ). Mouthparts elongate, in profile view mouthparts extending beyond mandibles to distance roughly 2/3rds length of head ( -Figure 62A +Figure 62A ). Clypeus weakly but evenly domed, punctate, laterally punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameters, medially becoming sparser and more irregular, here separated by 0.5–2 puncture diameters, with unclear and poorly defined longitudinal impunctate mid-line; underlying surface weakly shagreened basally, more or less smooth and shining over majority of area ( -Figure 62C +Figure 62C ). Process of labrum short, rounded rectangular, 3–4 times wider than long, surface polishing and shining. Gena slightly exceeding width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance slightly exceeding diameter of lateral ocellus. Foveae dorsally narrow, occupying ⅓ of space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, narrower than width of flagellum, narrowing further ventrally at level of antennal insertions; foveae filled with brown hairs. Face medially, gena, vertex, and scape covered with long white hairs, none equalling length of scape; face with long black hairs along inner margins of compound eyes, extending sparsely onto frons, vertex, and dorsolateral parts of gena, intermixing with white hairs. Antennae dark basally, A5–12 ventrally slightly lightened by presence of grey scales; A3 exceeding A4+5, shorter than A4+5+6. @@ -207,16 +208,16 @@ Dark, 1.05 times longer than wide ( : Scutum and scutellum finely shagreened, weakly shining over majority of area, sculpture becoming weaker medially, here more strongly shining; surface irregularly punctate, punctures separated by <0.5–2 puncture diameters ( -Figure 62E +Figure 62E ). Pronotum rounded.Mesepisternum with fine granular shagreen, weakly shining. Dorsolateral parts of propodeum with fine granular shagreen, shagreen overlain with sparse network of raised rugosity forming appearance of large shallow punctures with raised rims. Propodeal triangle narrow, internal surface with granular microreticulation, propodeal triangle thus defined by change in surface sculpture; triangle basally with short raised rugae. Mesepisternum with long white plumose hairs, longest not equalling length of scape; scutum and scutellum with shorter plumose hairs, hairs predominantly white but black hairs frequently intermixed medially. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, dorsal fringe composed of white plumose hairs, internal surface with mixture of numerous plumose and non-plumose hairs. Legs dark, pubescence whitish to light brownish. Flocculus complete, composed of sparse white plumose hairs; femoral and tibial scopae composed of white simple hairs, tibial scopae dorsally with dark brown hairs adjacent to basitibial plate. Hind tarsal claws with short inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation brown-orange, nervulus interstitial. Metasoma: Terga dark, apical rims narrowly and obscurely lightened hyaline-brown, tergal discs punctate, punctures deep, separated by 1–3 puncture diameters; tergal margins impunctate ( -Figure 62F +Figure 62F ). Tergal discs and margins finely microreticulate, moderately shining. Margins of T2–3 weakly impressed, margin of T4 moderately impressed. Tergal discs with short white hairs, becoming longer laterally; hairs forming obscure and sparse apical hairbands at base of margins T2–4, very widely separated on T2–3, complete on T4. Apical fringe of T5 and hairs flanking pygidial plate dark brown. Pygidial plate rounded triangular, margins impunctate, medially with irregularlysized punctures. - + FIGURE 62. @@ -246,13 +247,13 @@ female. D. Face, frontal view. Body length: 7–8 mm ( -Figure 63A +Figure 63A ). Head: Dark, 1.05 times wider than long ( -Figure 63C +Figure 63C ). Clypeus weakly domed and broadly flat medially, surface densely punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters; underlying surface dull basally and laterally, smooth and shining medially. Process of labrum rounded trapezoidal, 2 times wider than long, surface smooth and shining. Gena slightly exceeding width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance 1.5 times diameter of lateral ocellus. Face medially, gena, vertex, and scape covered with long white hairs, longest slightly exceeding length of scape; face with long black hairs along inner margins of compound eyes, extending sparsely onto frons, vertex, and dorsolateral parts of gena, intermixing with white hairs. Antennae dark basally, A5–13 ventrally slightly lightened by presence of grey scales; A3 1.5 times longer than A4, A4 only slightly longer than wide, A5–13 rectangular, clearly longer than wide ( -Figure 63E +Figure 63E ). @@ -267,9 +268,9 @@ uniformly with long white hairs, longest exceeding length of scape. Legs dark, p Metasoma: Terga structurally as in female, pubescence more scattered, not forming regular apical hairbands at base of tergal margins ( -Figure 63B +Figure 63B ). S8 narrow, columnar, ventral surface covered with spreading white hairs. Genital capsule simple, gonocoxae apically produced into slight rounded bumps, gonostyli narrow, slightly broadened apically, spatulate, inner margins slightly raised ( -Figure 63G +Figure 63G ). Penis valves narrow, more or less parallel-sided, occupying ¼ of space between gonostyli, slightly constricted medially. @@ -292,7 +293,7 @@ due to the narrow facial foveae, occupying slightly less than one third of the s A. ridicula is immediately recognisable in the female sex due to its clearly elongate head and clypeus ( -Figures 62B–C +Figures 62B–C ), with the head 1.05 times longer than wide which is unusual in Andrena @@ -319,7 +320,7 @@ Warncke, 1975 A. canuta is also slightly shorter, 1.1 times wider than long ( -Figure 62D +Figure 62D ). @@ -328,7 +329,7 @@ Separation in the male sex is more challenging, as is almost always the case in Euandrena unless the genital capsule or hidden sterna are strongly distinctive. Due to the relatively elongate head ( -Figure 63C +Figure 63C ; only 1.05 times wider than long), A. ridicula @@ -338,39 +339,39 @@ males can again be compared to males of A. canuta ( -Figure 63D +Figure 63D ; head 1.15 times wider than long), and a combination of characters should be used to allow separation. In addition to the slightly more elongate head, A. ridicula has A3 comparatively longer, 1.5 times longer than A4 and segments A5–11 are only slightly longer than wide ( -Figure 63E +Figure 63E ; in A. canuta with A3 only slightly longer than A4, and A5–11 clearly longer than wide, -Figure 63F +Figure 63F ), the face has black hairs limited to the inner margins of the compound eyes with white hairs on the clypeus ( -Figure 63C +Figure 63C ; in A. canuta with more abundant black hairs on the face, these extending across the lower paraocular areas and clypeus, -Figure 63D +Figure 63D ), the tergal sculpture and punctation, with the tergal discs shagreened and weakly shining, contrasting the more strongly shining marginal areas, the discs themselves with obscure punctures that partially disappear into the background sculpture (in A. canuta with less contrast between the disc and marginal areas which are equally shagreened and weakly shining, and with the tergal discs more clearly punctate with punctures distinct against the underlying sculpture), and the genital capsule with the penis valves extremely narrow, occupying only a quarter of the space between the gonostyli ( -Figure 63G +Figure 63G ; in A. canuta with the penis valves comparatively slightly broader, occupying one third of this space, -Figure 63H +Figure 63H ). See above for diagnosis against A. eosphora @@ -426,7 +427,7 @@ South-eastern Hakkâri ). - + FIGURE 63. diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC3D431D0B83FE598AC902E0.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC3D431D0B83FE598AC902E0.xml index f8d661c1821..0f195e9abcf 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC3D431D0B83FE598AC902E0.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC3D431D0B83FE598AC902E0.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ -Figures 64A–C; E; G +Figures 64A–C; E; G . @@ -146,13 +147,13 @@ same information as Body length: 9–10 mm ( -Figure 64A +Figure 64A ). Head: Predominantly dark, with distinct metallic reflections on lower paraocular areas and clypeus, 1.2 times wider than long ( -Figure 64B +Figure 64B ). Clypeus medially dark, basolaterally dark metallic blue-green, intervening area with purple-blue rainbow-like metallic reflections ( -Figure 64C +Figure 64C ); clypeus evenly domed, irregularly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameters laterally, by 1–3 puncture diameters medially, underlying surface obscurely shagreened, predominantly smooth and shining. Process of labrum short, broadly triangular to trapezoidal, slightly wider than long. Gena slightly exceeding width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance equalling diameter of lateral ocellus. Foveae dorsally narrow, occupying slightly less than ½ space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, slightly narrowed further ventrally at level of antennal insertions, filled with brown hairs. Face, gena, vertex, and scape covered with white hairs, none equalling length of scape. Antennae basally dark, A5–12 ventrally slightly lightened by presence of grey scales, A3 slightly exceeding A4+5. @@ -161,7 +162,7 @@ Predominantly dark, with distinct metallic reflections on lower paraocular areas : Scutum and scutellum strongly microreticulate, dull anteriorly and laterally, sculpture becoming weaker medially, here weakly shining; surface obscurely and irregularly punctate; punctures shallow, separated by 1–3 puncture diameters, anteriorly and laterally disappearing into underlying sculpture ( -Figure 64E +Figure 64E ). Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum with fine and dense network of granular reticulation, surface with shallow scattered punctures, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters. Dorsolateral parts of propodeum with fine and dense network of granular reticulation, this surface overlain with pattern of raised reticulation forming irregular ridges; propodeal triangle broad, delineated by change in surface sculpture, internal surface with fine granular reticulation, without raised ridges. Mesosoma with long whitish plumose hairs, none equalling length of scape. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, weak, dorsal fringe composed of whitish plumose hairs, internal surface with occasional long whitish simple hairs. Legs dark, apical tarsal segments and hind basitarsi lightened brownish, pubescence whitish to brownish. Flocculus complete but very sparse, composed of white plumose hairs; femoral and tibial scopae composed of white simple hairs. Hind tarsal claws with inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation orange-brown, nervulus interstitial. @@ -169,7 +170,7 @@ with long whitish plumose hairs, none equalling length of scape. Propodeal corbi Metasoma: Terga predominantly dark but discs with distinct metallic green-bronze reflections, tergal margins with apical rims depressed and broadly lightened hyaline-yellow ( -Figure 64G +Figure 64G ). Tergal discs regularly and finely punctate, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters, underlying surface shagreened basally, smooth and shining over majority of area. Tergal discs with very short hairs, margins of T1–4 with dense complete apical hairbands of moderately long whitish hairs, obscuring underlying surface. Apical fringe of T5 and hairs flanking pygidial plate dark brown. Pygidial plate large, rounded triangular, apical margin obscurely raised, internal surface covered with dense punctures, punctures separated by 0.5 puncture diameters, interspaces slightly raised, forming fine network. @@ -192,7 +193,7 @@ due to the narrow facial foveae, occupying slightly less than half the space bet Euandrena , it is unusual in presenting faint metallic green reflections on the tergal discs and clypeus ( -Figures 64C; G +Figures 64C; G ). Green metallic reflections are rare in this subgenus, and are more typically found in Central Asian species including A. ahenea @@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ Astafurova Andrena semota can quickly be separated from all of the above species due to the strongly shagreened and obscurely punctate scutum ( -Figure 64E +Figure 64E ; scutum polished and shining with clear punctures in A. ahenea @@ -264,7 +265,7 @@ and ). - + FIGURE 64. @@ -326,29 +327,29 @@ can be distinguished by the shape and colouration of the clypeus, which is more A. scrophulariae with the clypeus medially more flattened, with at most extremely obscure metallic green reflections basally), by the process of the labrum which is small, short, and triangular, slightly wider than long ( -Figure 64C +Figure 64C ; in A. scrophulariae with the process of the labrum trapezoidal, long, as long as wide or slightly longer, -Figure 64D +Figure 64D ), by the scutum which is strongly shagreened with obscure and shallow punctures ( -Figure 64E +Figure 64E ; in A. scrophulariae with scutum shagreened-microreticulate, but punctures comparatively deeper and more distinct, -Figure 64F +Figure 64F ), and the tergal discs with metallic green reflections and comparatively less densely punctate, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters ( -Figure 64G +Figure 64G ; in A. scrophulariae with tergal discs dark, lacking metallic reflections, and comparatively more densely punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters, -Figure 64H +Figure 64H ). diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC5143700B83F9CD8FE6071E.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC5143700B83F9CD8FE6071E.xml index 7043c433eff..7636d515c4e 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC5143700B83F9CD8FE6071E.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC5143700B83F9CD8FE6071E.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,9 +59,9 @@ -Figures 4A–F +Figures 4A–F ; -5A–D +5A–D . @@ -200,16 +201,16 @@ S Cádiz Body length: 8 mm ( -Figure 4A +Figure 4A ). Head: Dark, 1.35 times wider than long ( -Figure 4B +Figure 4B ). Clypeus strongly domed, densely shagreened, very weakly shining, obscurely punctate with shallow and poorlyformed punctures that disappear into underlying sculpture, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters. Process of labrum trapezoidal with angles weakly rounded, 3 times wider than long. Gena equalling width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance equalling diameter of lateral ocellus. Foveae dorsally occupying ½ space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, reaching upper level of antennal insertions; foveae filled with dark brown hairs. Head predominantly covered with whitish to light brownish plumose hairs, with black plumose hairs restricted to inner margins of compound eyes and frons, not equalling length of scape ( -Figure 4C +Figure 4C ). Antennae dark, A5–12 ventrally lightened by presence of grey scales; A3 exceeding A4+5, slightly shorter than A4+5+6. - + FIGURE 4. @@ -231,15 +232,15 @@ female. A. Habitus, lateral view; B. Face, frontal view; C. Face, anterolateral : Scutum and scutellum with strong granular microsculpture, dull to obscurely shining, with large shallow punctures, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters anteriorly and laterally, becoming very sparse posteromedially ( -Figure 4D +Figure 4D ). Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum and dorsolateral parts of propodeum with granular microsculpture, dull to weakly shining; propodeal triangle finely delineated by lateral carinae, internal surface with similar granular shagreen, basally with short raised rugae ( -Figure 4E +Figure 4E ). Mesepisternum with long whitish to light brownish strongly plumose hairs, not equalling length of scape, becoming shorter and much sparser on scutum and scutellum. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, dorsal fringe composed of plumose whitish to light brownish hairs, internal surface with numerous plumose pale hairs. Legs dark, pubescence whitish to light brownish. Posterior face of hind femorae each with 6-7 orange pointed spines, spines intermixed with sparse pale stiff white hairs, length of spines exceeding diameter of lateral ocellus. Flocculus complete, strong, composed of pale plumose hairs; femoral and tibial scopae composed of predominantly white simple hairs, tibial scopae dorsally with some apically plumose hairs. Hind tarsal claws with small inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation dark orange-brown, nervulus interstitial. Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, apical rims of tergal margins increasingly broadly lightened hyaline-yellow, narrowly so on T1, occupying slightly more than ½ visible margin of T4 ( -Figure 4F +Figure 4F ). Terga with marginal areas of T2–4 strongly depressed, most strongly on T4, forming clear contrast with discs. Tergal discs shagreened, weakly shining, with abundant hair-bearing punctures, punctures without defined rims but clearly visible against underlying sculpture, separated by 1–2 puncture diameters. T1 with numerous long erect whitish hairs, shorter but more abundant on discs of T2–4, margins of T2–4 with complete hairbands emerging from base of marginal areas, overlying marginal areas, not obscuring underlying surface. Apical fringe of T5 and hair flanking pygidial plate brown. Pygidial plate broadly rounded triangular, surface dull, featureless. @@ -247,11 +248,11 @@ Tergal discs dark, apical rims of tergal margins increasingly broadly lightened Body length: 7 mm ( -Figure 5A +Figure 5A ). Head: Dark, 1.25 times wider than long ( -Figure 5B +Figure 5B ). Clypeus domed, with somewhat latitudinally compressed punctures, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters, underlying surface shagreened, weakly shining. Process of labrum rounded trapezoidal, 2 times wider than long, anterior margin widely but shallowly emarginate. Gena slightly exceeding width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance equalling diameter of lateral ocellus. Face with mixture of light and dark hairs, dark hairs predominantly restricted to inner margins of compound eyes; gena ventrally with long pale to light brownish hairs, becoming intermixed with black dorsolaterally, vertex with pale hairs; longest hairs on face hairs clearly exceeding length of scape. Antennae basally dark, A4–13 ventrally lightened by presence of brownish scales; A3 exceeding length of A4, shorter than A4–5, A4 subquadrate, slightly broader than long. @@ -267,9 +268,9 @@ covered in long whitish to light brownish hairs, those on mesepisternum exceedin Metasoma: Metasoma structurally as in female. Terga covered in scattered long light brown hairs, not forming clear apical hairbands ( -Figure 5C +Figure 5C ). T6–7 with long light brown hairs overlying pygidial plate of T7. S8 with pronounced disc, disc with posterior margin rounded semi-circular, ventral surface covered with dense laterally and posteriorly projecting tuft of dark brown to black hairs. Genital capsule elongate, gonocoxae produced into broadly rounded apical teeth, gonostyli basally narrow, becoming broad, flattened, and spatulate apically, inner margin strongly raised ( -Figure 5D +Figure 5D ). Penis valves moderately wide basally, occupying ⅓ space between gonostyli, evenly narrowing apically. @@ -292,7 +293,7 @@ due to the short and broad head with short and broad facial foveae combined with avara -group, the strongly depressed apical margins of T2–4 with the apical rims of the terga clearly lightened hyaline white-yellow ( -Figure 4F +Figure 4F ) place it closest to A. caligata @@ -318,15 +319,15 @@ with the tergal discs obscurely punctate, punctures small and not strongly contr A. caligata (comparative material required). See also the identification key below. The male can also be recognised using the same combination of characters; the tergal margins of T2–4 are strongly depressed with the apical rims clearly lightened hyaline white-yellow ( -Figure 5C +Figure 5C ), the tergal discs have visible and dense hair-bearing punctures, and the apexes of the gonocoxae are produced into rounded teeth ( -Figure 5D +Figure 5D ; not strongly truncate as in A. gavia , -Figure 3C +Figure 3C ). @@ -355,7 +356,7 @@ female is covered in Erodium pollen grains ( -Figures 4A; F +Figures 4A; F ), and A. baldocki diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC52436B0B83FA048FA507EC.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC52436B0B83FA048FA507EC.xml index 9fc3048b47d..c5f4a842d4d 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC52436B0B83FA048FA507EC.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC52436B0B83FA048FA507EC.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,9 +59,9 @@ -Figures 6A–C; E; G +Figures 6A–C; E; G ; -7A–C; E–F +7A–C; E–F . @@ -121,14 +122,14 @@ Body length: 7 mm ( -Figure 6A +Figure 6A ). Head: Dark, 1.45 times wider than long ( -Figure 6C +Figure 6C ). Clypeus weakly domed, moderately flattened medially, weakly punctate, punctures slightly latitudinally compressed, separated by 1 puncture diameter; underlying surface with granular shagreen, weakly shining, punctures disappearing into underlying sculpture. Process of labrum narrow, slightly wider than long, with deep narrow emargination medially. Gena equalling width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance equalling diameter of lateral ocellus. Foveae dorsally occupying ½ space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, ventrally slightly narrowing, reaching upper level of antennal insertions; foveae filled with dark brown hairs. Head predominantly covered with long black hairs, with some pale hairs intermixed on frons and vertex; longest hairs equalling length of scape. Antennae basally dark, A6–12 ventrally lightened dark orange, ventral surface covered with isolated silvery scales; A3 equalling A4+5. - + FIGURE 6. @@ -161,15 +162,15 @@ female. D. Face, frontal view; F. Scutum, dorsal view; H. Propodeum, dorsal view : Scutum and scutellum finely shagreened, laterally weakly shining, shagreen becoming weaker medially, here almost shining; surface punctate, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters ( -Figure 6E +Figure 6E ). Pronotum laterally with weak humeral angle. Mesepisternum and dorsolateral parts of propodeum with fine granular shagreen, weakly shining. Propodeal triangle, laterally delineated by fine carinae, internal surface with weaky raised fine rugae in basal half ( -Figure 6G +Figure 6G ). Mesepisternum with long black plumose hairs, longest equalling length of scape. Scutum and scutellum with shorter predominantly white plumose hairs, with scattered intermixed black hairs. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, sparse, dorsal fringe composed of pale plumose hairs, internal surface with abundant simple light brownish hairs. Legs dark brown, pubescence light brown. Posterior face of hind femorae rounded, without spines. Flocculus incomplete, composed of whitish plumose hairs; femoral scopae composed of white simple hairs, tibial scopae composed of simple hairs, ventrally white, dorsally light brown. Hind tarsal claws with inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation dark brown to orange, nervulus antefurcal. Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, marginal areas weakly depressed, most strongly on T3–4, lightened hyaline-brown ( -Figure 6B +Figure 6B ). Tergal discs polished and shining, weak microsculpture present only narrowly basally; T1 sparsely punctate, punctures separated by 2–3 puncture diameters, T2–4 with punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters. Tergal discs with very short sparse white hairs, T1–4 apically with long whitish hairs, forming weak apical hairbands, broadly interrupted on T1–3, complete on T4, not obscuring underlying surface. Apical fringe of T5 and hairs flanking pygidial plate orange-brown. Pygidial plate rounded triangular, surface dull, featureless. @@ -177,15 +178,15 @@ Tergal discs dark, marginal areas weakly depressed, most strongly on T3–4, lig Body length: 6 mm ( -Figure 7A +Figure 7A ). Head: Dark, 1.5 times wider than long ( -Figure 7B +Figure 7B ). Clypeus very weakly domed, broadly flattened over majority of area with exception of anterior ⅓, this slightly protruding; surface punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameter with exception of weak longitudinal impunctate mid-line, underlying surface shagreened, weakly shining. Apical margin of clypeus with narrow yellow marking ( -Figure 7B +Figure 7B ). Process of labrum rounded trapezoidal, 2 times broader than long, anterior margin with shallow broad emargination. Gena slightly exceeding width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance 2 times diameter of lateral ocellus ( -Figure 7C +Figure 7C ). Face and scape covered with long black hairs, gena and vertex predominantly with white hairs, with occasional intermixed black hairs.Antennae basally dark, A6–12 ventrally lightened by presence of orange scales;A3 exceeding A4, slightly shorter than A4+5. @@ -199,9 +200,9 @@ structurally as in female. Mesepisternum with long black plumose hairs, hairs ex Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, apical rims narrowly lightened hyaline-brown ( -Figure 7E +Figure 7E ). Tergal discs polished and shining, weak microsculpture present only narrowly basally; T1–4 punctate, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters. Tergal discs with very short sparse white hairs, not forming apical hairbands. T6–7 with long dark brown hairs overlying pygidial plate of T7. S8 columnar, more or less parallel-sided until short broadened apical process; ventral surface medially with two lateral tufts of dense brown hair. Genital capsule slightly elongate, gonocoxae apically produced into weakly rounded teeth, gonostyli with apexes broadly produced into flattened triangular wedges with inner margins raised, stem part of gonostyli with raised longitudinal ridge along inner margins ( -Figure 7F +Figure 7F ). Penis valves moderately developed, occupying ½ space between gonostyli, medially broadened, apically narrowing. @@ -244,7 +245,7 @@ lacks spines on the hind face of the hind femorae. Due to their extensive black Warncke, 1965 ; -Figure 8 +Figure 8 ). @@ -253,41 +254,41 @@ In the female sex, the two species are very close, but A. collisa can be separated by the punctation of the clypeus which is obscurely punctate with latitudinally compressed punctures that disappear into the underlying clypeal sculpture ( -Figure 6C +Figure 6C ; in A. canohirta with the clypeus covered with shallow but large, round, and clearly visible punctures that do not disappear into the underlying sculpture, -Figure 6D +Figure 6D ), by the sculpture of the scutum which is laterally shagreened becoming polished medially ( -Figure 6E +Figure 6E ; in A. canohirta with the scutum uniformly shagreened, -Figure 6F +Figure 6F ), by the ocelloccipital distance which is subequal to the diameter of a lateral ocellus (in A. canohirta with the ocelloccipital distance 1.2 times the diameter of a lateral ocellus), by the finely delineated propodeal triangle with finely raised internal rugae ( -Figure 6G +Figure 6G ; in A. canohirta with the propodeal triangle more coarsely delineated, internal surface slightly depressed and covered in more strongly raised internal rugae, -Figure 6H +Figure 6H ), by the golden-brown terminal fringe ( -Figure 6B +Figure 6B ; in A. canohirta with the terminal fringe dark brown, -Figure 8H +Figure 8H ), and by the slightly smaller body length of 7 mm ( @@ -296,15 +297,15 @@ with the terminal fringe dark brown, 7–8 mm in length). Separation of males is much easier, as the ocelloccipital distance is 2 times the diameter of a lateral ocellus ( -Figure 7A +Figure 7A ), whereas in A. canohirta it is 3.5 times this diameter ( -Figure 7D +Figure 7D ). The clypeus is also apically marked with a small area of yellow ( -Figure 7B +Figure 7B ), whereas A. canohirta @@ -312,7 +313,7 @@ it is 3.5 times this diameter ( always has the clypeus black; additional material is necessary to establish whether this is a consistent character. - + FIGURE 7. @@ -339,7 +340,7 @@ male. A. Habitus, lateral view; B. Face, frontal view; C. Vertex, dorsal view; E male. D. Vertex, dorsal view. - + FIGURE 8. @@ -375,7 +376,7 @@ inconsistently referred to his material of A. canohirta , referring to a male on p. 186, then a female in the description of the species on p. 206, and then a male at the end of the description. The description is clearly of a female specimen, since Friese mentions the scopae. The only specimen in the ZMHB is a female ( -Figures 8A–B +Figures 8A–B ), and it matches the collecting details given by Friese; it is considered to automatically be the holotype , and references to males are simply lapsus on the part of Friese. diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC6243400B83FF5C8AD00366.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC6243400B83FF5C8AD00366.xml index 73aa8b32f86..952a5e40639 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC6243400B83FF5C8AD00366.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC6243400B83FF5C8AD00366.xml @@ -1,43 +1,44 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 @@ -96,7 +97,7 @@ : Corsica, DEI, examined] syn. nov. ( -Figures 38A–F +Figures 38A–F ) @@ -144,7 +145,7 @@ has a strongly shining scutellum, but this is only true in the summer generation A. corssubalpina ( -Figure 38D +Figure 38D ). It should be noted that spring individuals of A. minutuloides @@ -164,9 +165,9 @@ is more weakly wrinkled, the scutum is duller and less strongly punctured, and t across both generations and when considering specimens from across its large range from Morocco to Central Asia. The specimen itself also shows the slightly ventrally constricted foveae and tergal margins with weak apical hair fringes ( -Figure 38F +Figure 38F ; -1 +1 st generation only) typical of diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC68434A0B83FF5C8DF605FE.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC68434A0B83FF5C8DF605FE.xml index 396d5d1ac55..03bf6c448e9 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC68434A0B83FF5C8DF605FE.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC68434A0B83FF5C8DF605FE.xml @@ -1,43 +1,44 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 @@ -94,7 +95,7 @@ ssp. , ZMHB, examined] syn. nov. ( -Figures 31A–D +Figures 31A–D ) @@ -157,7 +158,7 @@ can be separated from A. nigriceps due to the polished and shining clypeus, with clear shining interspaces between clypeal punctures ( -Figure 31C +Figure 31C ). The type specimen of @@ -171,7 +172,7 @@ simply represents an individual with darker than average pubescence relative to A. jagnobensis ( -Figure 31D +Figure 31D ). True A. nigriceps diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC6F434D0B83FC198E8501CB.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC6F434D0B83FC198E8501CB.xml index a84f95f8e33..7fb4ba3e1e0 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC6F434D0B83FC198E8501CB.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC6F434D0B83FC198E8501CB.xml @@ -1,43 +1,44 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 @@ -95,7 +96,7 @@ , NHMUK, examined] syn. nov. ( -Figures 35A–D +Figures 35A–D ) @@ -197,7 +198,7 @@ Osytshnjuk . (2008: 191) . Based on the genital capsule ( -Figure 35D +Figure 35D ), as well as the rest of the specimen characteristics, A. phaneroleuca diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7043510B83F88F8C4204E8.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7043510B83F88F8C4204E8.xml index 3da674a8df7..59fab79dd1f 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7043510B83F88F8C4204E8.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7043510B83F88F8C4204E8.xml @@ -1,43 +1,44 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 @@ -74,7 +75,7 @@ , NMW, lectotype by present designation] ( -Figures 25A–D +Figures 25A–D ) diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7243570B83F9A48F4C075C.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7243570B83F9A48F4C075C.xml index e1fa23952ce..65d8baeacdd 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7243570B83F9A48F4C075C.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7243570B83F9A48F4C075C.xml @@ -1,43 +1,44 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 @@ -74,7 +75,7 @@ , NMW, lectotype by present designation] ( -Figures 27A–D +Figures 27A–D ) diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7343500B83F8E88FB407B4.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7343500B83F8E88FB407B4.xml index a1418da7815..ec2c606ea62 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7343500B83F8E88FB407B4.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7343500B83F8E88FB407B4.xml @@ -1,43 +1,44 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 @@ -72,7 +73,7 @@ Schmiedeknecht, 1884 , NMW, lectotype by present designation] ( -Figures 26A–D +Figures 26A–D ) diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7443550B83FAD38C680370.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7443550B83FAD38C680370.xml index 7b063b1314d..5331524b42d 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7443550B83FAD38C680370.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7443550B83FAD38C680370.xml @@ -1,43 +1,44 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 @@ -76,7 +77,7 @@ Cockerell, 1929 , NHMUK, lectotype by present designation] ( -Figures 29A– D +Figures 29A– D ) @@ -182,7 +183,7 @@ by present designation) . - + FIGURE 29. diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7543570B83FA5C8F0001E5.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7543570B83FA5C8F0001E5.xml index 8757400b991..8edee2f25e4 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7543570B83FA5C8F0001E5.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCAC7543570B83FA5C8F0001E5.xml @@ -1,43 +1,44 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 @@ -77,7 +78,7 @@ , NMW, lectotype by present designation] ( -Figures 28A–D +Figures 28A–D ) diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACD143F10B83FE118D6F05E4.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACD143F10B83FE118D6F05E4.xml index 90b867929ac..a3287fea277 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACD143F10B83FE118D6F05E4.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACD143F10B83FE118D6F05E4.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ -Figures 82A–C; E; G–H +Figures 82A–C; E; G–H . @@ -90,13 +91,13 @@ Body length: 6 mm ( -Figure 82A +Figure 82A ). Head: Dark, 1.25 times wider than long ( -Figure 82B +Figure 82B ). Clypeus domed, irregularly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1.5 puncture diameters, punctures deep, interspaces unevenly raised, poorly defined impunctate longitudinal mid-line present; underlying surface weakly shagreened and more or less shining. Process of labrum narrowly trapezoidal, slightly longer than wide. Gena subequal to width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance 1.5 times diameter of lateral ocellus. Frons polished and shining, deeply and regularly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters ( -Figure 82C +Figure 82C ). Foveae dorsally narrow, dorsally occupying ⅓ of space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, equalling width of flagellum; foveae narrowing ventrally, at level of antennal insertions separated from inner margin of compound eye by own diameter, this space shining; foveae filled with light brown hairs. Face, gena, vertex, and scape with short whitish-brown hairs, none equalling length of scape. Antennae dark basally, A4–12 ventrally lightened by presence of orange scales, A3 equalling A4+5. @@ -105,15 +106,15 @@ Dark, 1.25 times wider than long ( : Scutum and scutellum regularly but shallowly punctate, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters, underlying surface evenly shagreened, weakly shining ( -Figure 82E +Figure 82E ). Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum with coarse granular shagreen, anteriorly overlain by weakly raised rugosity. Dorsolateral parts of propodeum with extremely fine shagreen, contrasting propodeal triangle which is covered with coarser granular shagreen, basally with obscure, short, and weakly raised rugae, surface weakly shining ( -Figure 82G +Figure 82G ). Mesepisternum with thickly plumose white hairs, hairs becoming shorter on scutum and scutellum, sub-squamous. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, dorsal fringe composed of whitish plumose hairs, internal surface with scattered long whitish hairs. Legs dark, apical tarsal segments lightened brownish, pubescence light brown. Flocculus incomplete, composed of white plumose hairs; femoral and tibial scopae composed of white simple hairs. Hind tarsal claws without inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation orange, nervulus weakly antefurcal. Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, marginal areas broadly lightened hyaline yellow to obscure reddish brown ( -Figure 82H +Figure 82H ). Tergal discs strongly microreticulate, dull more or less impunctate, sculpture becoming weaker on margins, weakly shining. T2–4 laterally with weak, widely separated apical hairbands of whitish hairs. Apical fringe of T5 composed of long whitish hairs, overlying orange hairs flanking pygidial plate. Pygidial plate subtriangular, apically rounded, surface flat and featureless, surface finely shagreened and weakly shining. @@ -141,9 +142,9 @@ Warncke, 1975 only) due to the small body size ( 5–6 mm ), black integument, ventrally narrow facial foveae, shagreened impunctate terga, propodeal triangle which is covered with fine to moderately coarse granular shagreen, with minimal raised rugae basally, weakly antefurcal nervulus, and long ocelloccipital distance ( -Figures 81C–D +Figures 81C–D ; -1.5–2 +1.5–2 times the diameter of a lateral ocellus). However, A. konyella @@ -184,7 +185,7 @@ species by the long ocelloccipital distance (usually <1 times the diameter of , further study with genetic tools is required. - + FIGURE 82. @@ -217,13 +218,13 @@ differs from A. konyella by the densely punctate frons, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters, the underlying surface shiny and hence punctures are clearly visible ( -Figure 82C +Figure 82C ; in A. konyella with punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters, the underlying surface shagreened and hence the punctures are less distinct, -Figure 82D +Figure 82D ), by the shorter ocelloccipital distance of 1.5 times the diameter of a lateral ocellus (in A. konyella @@ -233,13 +234,13 @@ with the ocelloccipital distance of 2 times the diameter of a lateral ocellus), A. konyella occupying slightly less than ½ of the space between the compound eye and a lateral ocellus), and by the more regularly and densely punctate scutum, with punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters ( -Figure 82E +Figure 82E ; in A. konyella with punctures irregular, separated by 1–4 puncture diameters, -Figure 82F +Figure 82F ). diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACD343F60B83FC3D8FE606B8.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACD343F60B83FC3D8FE606B8.xml index bcb08466fad..a0f67a99ffc 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACD343F60B83FC3D8FE606B8.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACD343F60B83FC3D8FE606B8.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,9 +59,9 @@ -Figures 83A–C; E +Figures 83A–C; E ; -84A–D +84A–D . @@ -113,15 +114,15 @@ Unknown. Body length 7 mm ( -Figure 83A +Figure 83A ). Head: Dark, 1.1 times wider than long ( -Figure 83C +Figure 83C ). Clypeus weakly domed, more or less flattened over majority of area medially; surface irregularly punctate, laterally punctures separated by 1 puncture diameter, medially becoming sparser, here separated by 2–4 puncture diameters, underlying surface smooth and shining. Process of labrum rounded rectangular, 2 times wider than long, apical margin slightly impressed. Mouthparts with labial and maxillary palpi elongate, maxillary palpi with six segments, labial palpi with four segments. Gena broad, 2 times width of compound eye, posterior margin produced into strong carina in dorsal half, carina extending to upper margin of compound eye, thus head strongly angular in dorsal view ( -Figure 83E +Figure 83E ); ocelloccipital distance equal to diameter of lateral ocellus. Face, gena, vertex, and scape covered in dark black hairs, longest equalling length of scape. Antennae dark, A3 equalling A4+5, A4 subquadrate, slightly shorter than broad, A5–13 rectangular longer than wide ( -Figure 83B +Figure 83B ). @@ -130,21 +131,21 @@ Dark, 1.1 times wider than long ( : Scutum and scutellum uniformly covered in granular shagreen, weakly shining, surface with large, irregular, hair-bearing punctures, punctures separated by 1–3 puncture diameters ( -Figure 84A +Figure 84A ). Pronotum with strong humeral angle. Mesepisternum with granular shagreen, weakly shining, shagreen overlain by weakly raised irregular reticulation. Propodeum uniformly covered with fine granular shagreen, dull to weakly shining; propodeal triangle obscure, almost undifferentiated from dorsolateral parts of propodeum, with weak short rugae basally ( -Figure 84B +Figure 84B ). Mesepisternum and propodeum with long black hairs and occasional scattered white hairs, clearly exceeding length of scape; scutum and scutellum with shorter black and scattered white hairs. Legs dark, pubescence black to dark brown, with sparse fringe of white hairs on ventral margin of hind tibiae. Hind tarsal claws with inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation dark orange-brown, nervulus strongly antefurcal. Metasoma: Terga dark, marginal areas obscurely lightened hyaline-brown apically; tergal discs finely microreticulate, weakly shining, obscurely punctured, punctures separated by 2–3 puncture diameters ( -Figure 84C +Figure 84C ). Tergal discs with scattered short light to dark brown hair, not forming apical hairbands. T6–7 with long dark brown hairs overlying pygidial plate of T7. S8 columnar, apex slightly broadened, rounded; ventral surface with lateral fan of brown hairs. Genital capsule slightly elongate, gonocoxae produced into apically rounded teeth, gonostyli apically broadened and flattened, inner margin distinctly upturned ( -Figure 84D +Figure 84D ). Penis valves moderately broad, occupying half space between gonostyli, narrowing and strongly constricted subapically. - + FIGURE 83. @@ -180,12 +181,12 @@ Pisanty . 2022a ;b) due to the head with broadened gena (clearly broader than the width of the compound eye), the elongate and falciform mandibles (clearly crossing apically), labial palpi elongate, propodeum with extensive fine granular reticulation ( -Figure 84B +Figure 84B ), with the propodeal triangle barely indicated, oviform metasoma, and genital capsule with the penis valves relatively broad (though importantly lacking lateral projections, -Figure 84D +Figure 84D ). - + FIGURE 84. @@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ can immediately be placed near to Mavromoustakis, 1958 because the penis valves lack conspicuous lateral pointed projections, the maxillary and labial palpi have six and four segments, respectively, and the gena is conspicuously carinate posteriorly, this carination extending to the upper margin of the compound eye so that in dorsal view the head has an extremely unusual angular form ( -Figures 82E–F +Figures 82E–F ); in the males of all other species, the gena is posteriorly rounded. Andrena tehranica @@ -247,13 +248,13 @@ can be separated due to its relatively more elongate face (only 1.1 times wider A. hyacinthina ), the inner margins of the compound eyes which are more or less parallel and only very weakly diverge ventrally ( -Figure 83C +Figure 83C ; in A. hyacinthina with the inner margins of the compound eyes strongly diverging ventrally, -Figure 83D +Figure 83D ), the smaller body size ( 7 mm vs @@ -263,13 +264,13 @@ in A. hyacinthina ), the darker body pubescence which is predominantly black with scattered white hairs on the scutum, scutellum, and the ventral margin of the hind tibiae ( -Figure 83E +Figure 83E ; in A. hyacinthina with pubescence predominantly pale, whitish to light brownish, with only a few scattered dark hairs on the frons, -Figure 83F +Figure 83F ), and the most strongly antefurcal nervulus (nervulus weakly antefurcal in A. hyacinthina diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACDA43FE0B83F9FD8D3E00FC.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACDA43FE0B83F9FD8D3E00FC.xml index 811ff8a00f7..58c52ae2988 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACDA43FE0B83F9FD8D3E00FC.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACDA43FE0B83F9FD8D3E00FC.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ -Figures 80A–F +Figures 80A–F . @@ -168,16 +169,16 @@ same information as Body length: 5.5– 6 mm ( -Figure 80A +Figure 80A ). Head: Dark, 1.3 times wider than long ( -Figure 80B +Figure 80B ). Clypeus domed, basal ½ shagreened, weakly shining with hints of metallic blue-green reflections, apical ½ smooth and shining, surface irregularly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–2 puncture diameters, sparsest medially. Process of labrum rounded trapezoidal, 2 times wider than long, apical margin weakly emarginate. Gena equalling width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance ⅔ diameter of lateral ocellus. Facial foveae moderately broad, occupying ⅓ space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, slightly broader than width of flagellum, slightly narrowing ventrally at level of antennal insertions; foveae filled with light brown hairs ( -Figure 80C +Figure 80C ). Face, gena, vertex, and scape with white hairs, none equalling length of scape. Antennae basally dark, A4–12 ventrally lightly lightened by presence of grey scales; A3 slightly exceeding A4+5, shorter than A4+5+6. - + FIGURE 80. @@ -197,15 +198,15 @@ female. A. Habitus, lateral view; B. Face, frontal view; C. Head, dorsal view; D : Scutum and scutellum with dense uniform granular shagreen, weakly shining, surface irregularly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–4 puncture diameters ( -Figure 80D +Figure 80D ). Pronotum rounded. Mesepisternum with uniform granular microreticulation, weakly shining.Dorsolateral parts of propodeum with granular microreticulation, weakly shining, sculpture overlain by weak network of raised rugosity. Propodeal triangle narrow, laterally delineated by fine carinae, medially slightly depressed, internal surface covered with network of raised rugae in basal ⅔ ( -Figure 80E +Figure 80E ). Mesepisternum with sparse long white hairs, longest equalling length of scape, scutum and scutellum with shorter sparse white hairs. Propodeal corbicula incomplete, dorsal fringe composed of sparse whitish plumose hairs, internal surface with scattered long white simple hairs. Legs dark, pubescence whitish to light brownish. Flocculus incomplete, composed of white plumose hairs; femoral and tibial scopae composed of white simple hairs. Hind tarsal claws with inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation orange, nervulus interstitial. Metasoma: Tergal discs dark, marginal areas broadly lightened hyaline white-yellow-brown ( -Figure 80F +Figure 80F ). Tergal discs basally shagreened, sculpture weakening apically, marginal areas smooth and shining; tergal discs sparsely punctate, puncture separated by 3–4 puncture diameters. Tergal discs with scattered white hairs of varying lengths, T2–3 laterally with obscure white hairbands. Apical fringe of T5 and hairs flanking pygidial plate brown. Pygidial plate rounded triangular, surface obscurely punctate, dull. @@ -276,13 +277,13 @@ at the present time, particularly since the male is unknown. Diagnosis is therefore best made to morphologically similar species. Due to the strongly shagreened, weakly shining, and sparsely punctate scutum ( -Figure 80D +Figure 80D ), the small body size, the relatively narrow facial foveae that occupy <½ the space between the compound eye and lateral ocellus ( -Figure 80C +Figure 80C ), the narrow, weakly defined, and somewhat medially constricted propodeal triangle ( -Figure 80E +Figure 80E ), and the weakly sculptured and sparsely punctate terga with apical rims lightened hyaline-yellow ( -Figure 80F +Figure 80F ), A. hakkariensis diff --git a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACDC43F30B83F8CD8C0F07C8.xml b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACDC43F30B83F8CD8C0F07C8.xml index 33a24e8db1c..65f0477d276 100644 --- a/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACDC43F30B83F8CD8C0F07C8.xml +++ b/data/61/2B/87/612B87FCACDC43F30B83F8CD8C0F07C8.xml @@ -1,45 +1,46 @@ - - - -Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) + + + +Further revisions to the Palaearctic Andrena fauna (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) - - -Author + + +Author -WOOD, T. J. +WOOD, T. J. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-22 + +2024 + +2024-07-22 - -5483 + +5483 - -1 + +1 - -1 -150 + +1 +150 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 -1175-5334 -AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5483.1.1 +1175-5334 +13209307 +AF0272DB-5588-411D-9EAE-DED4785BF170 - + @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ -Figures 81A–H +Figures 81A–H . @@ -92,13 +93,13 @@ Description. Female. Body length: 9.5 mm ( -Figure 81A +Figure 81A ). Head: Dark, 1.3 times wider than long ( -Figure 81B +Figure 81B ). Clypeus domed, densely but shallowly punctate, punctures separated by 0.5–1 puncture diameters, with hint of weak impunctate mid-line, underlying surface shagreened, weakly shining. Process of labrum rounded trapezoidal, slightly wider than long, surface shining ( -Figure 81C +Figure 81C ). Gena slightly exceeding width of compound eye; ocelloccipital distance 1.5 times diameter of lateral ocellus. Foveae moderately broad, occupying slightly more than malar areas space between compound eye and lateral ocellus, ventrally slightly passing lower margin of antennal insertions; foveae filled with dark brown hairs. Head covered with dark brow to light brown plumose hairs, hairs lightest around antennal insertions and on frons, none equalling length of scape. Antennae dark, A5–12 ventrally lightened by presence of grey scales; A3 exceeding A4, shorter than A4+5. @@ -107,19 +108,19 @@ Dark, 1.3 times wider than long ( : Scutum and scutellum strongly microreticulate and predominantly dull, with obscure punctures disappearing into underlying sculpture ( -Figure 81D +Figure 81D ). Pronotum with weak hint of humeral angle. Mesepisternum and dorsolateral part of propodeum with fine and uniform granular shagreen, weakly shining; propodeal triangle finely delineated by fine rim, internal surface with fine and uniform granular shagreen, basally with short raised rugae, propodeal triangle therefore poorly differentiated from remaining parts of propodeum ( -Figure 81E +Figure 81E ). Mesepisternum with long, densely plumose light brown hairs, becoming shorter and darker brown on scutum and scutellum ( -Figure 81F +Figure 81F ). Propodeal corbicula complete, dorsal and anterior fringes composed of long densely plumose light brown hairs, internal surface with sparse, long, simple light brown hairs. Legs dark, apical tarsal segments lightened orange-brown; fore and mid femorae with long fringes of plumose light brown hairs, remaining legs with light to dark brown pubescence. Flocculus complete, composed of light brown plumose hairs; femoral scopae composed of mixture of light brown simple and plumose hairs ( -Figure 81G +Figure 81G ). Tibial scopae composed of simple hair, dorsally dark brown to black, ventrally light brown. Hind tarsal claws with inner tooth. Wings hyaline, stigma and venation orange, nervulus weakly antefurcal. Metasoma: Terga dark, T1–2 with marginal areas broadly lightened hyaline brown ( -Figure 81H +Figure 81H ). Tergal discs strongly shagreened, weakly shining; surface weakly punctate, punctures separated by 1–2 puncture diameters, disappearing into underlying sculpture. Marginal areas of T2–4 weakly but distinctly depressed. Discs of T1–4 with sparse brown hairs, longest on T1, becoming progressively shorter on subsequent discs; T1–4 with weak apical hairbands, not obscuring underlying surface. Apical fringe of T5 and hairs flanking pygidial plate dark brown. Pygidial plate rounded triangular, apical rim slightly raised, internal surface densely punctate, punctures confluent, interspaces slightly shining. @@ -165,13 +166,13 @@ Pisanty . 2022b ) due to the pronotum with a very weak humeral angle; propodeum with almost no sculpture ( -Figure 81E +Figure 81E ), propodeal triangle thus subtly delineated; facial foveae relatively broad (occupying slightly more than ½ space between compound eye and lateral ocellus) and not narrowing ventrally; clypeus domed; A3 exceeding A 4 in length, shorter than A4+5; pollen collecting hairs complex, flocculus composed of strongly plumose hairs ( -Figure 81G +Figure 81G ); strongly plumose hairs present also on femoral scopae, ventral margins of fore and mid femorae, mesepisternum, and comprising propodeal corbiculae, propodeal corbiculae essentially complete; hind tibial scopae composed of simple hairs; and absence of other defining characters. The presence of abundant strongly plumose hairs that contrast the simple hairs of the tibial scopae ( -Figures 80F–G +Figures 80F–G ) are strongly reminiscent of A. ramosa @@ -212,7 +213,7 @@ illustrated in Wood A. risha can be separated due to the process of the labrum which is rounded trapezoidal, only slightly wider than long ( -Figure 81C +Figure 81C ; in A. ramosa @@ -230,13 +231,13 @@ with the foveae occupying slightly less than ½ of the space between the compoun A. ramosa with the pronotum rounded), scutum strongly microreticulate and predominantly dull, with obscure punctures disappearing into underlying sculpture ( -Figure78D +Figure78D ; in A. ramosa with the scutum shagreened and dull to weakly shining but with clear shallow punctures, punctures separated by 1–3 puncture diameters), and the finely shagreened propodeum with minimal sculpture, propodeal triangle almost undifferentiated from dorsolateral parts of propodeum ( -Figure 81E +Figure 81E ; in A. ramosa @@ -244,7 +245,7 @@ with the scutum shagreened and dull to weakly shining but with clear shallow pun with clear different between propodeal triangle and dorsolateral parts of propodeum, these latter parts covered with granular microreticulation overlain by loose network of raised reticulation, sculpture thus contrasting smooth surface of propodeal triangle). - + FIGURE 81. diff --git a/data/72/43/C3/7243C31306607756FF55F8ACFECD07A4.xml b/data/72/43/C3/7243C31306607756FF55F8ACFECD07A4.xml index f0d731302de..52d21e48ae3 100644 --- a/data/72/43/C3/7243C31306607756FF55F8ACFECD07A4.xml +++ b/data/72/43/C3/7243C31306607756FF55F8ACFECD07A4.xml @@ -1,67 +1,68 @@ - - - -A new species of Ultratenuipalpus and redescription of Ultratenuipalpus hainanensis (Wang) (Acari, Tenuipalpidae) + + + +A new species of Ultratenuipalpus and redescription of Ultratenuipalpus hainanensis (Wang) (Acari, Tenuipalpidae) - - -Author + + +Author -He, Hu-Die -0009-0003-5441-8023 -Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry Rural Affairs of Agriculture P. R. China, Guiyang 550025, China. +He, Hu-Die +0009-0003-5441-8023 +Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry Rural Affairs of Agriculture P. R. China, Guiyang 550025, China. - - -Author + + +Author -Jin, Dao-Chao -Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry Rural Affairs of Agriculture P. R. China, Guiyang 550025, China. -dcjin@gzu.edu.cn +Jin, Dao-Chao +Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry Rural Affairs of Agriculture P. R. China, Guiyang 550025, China. +dcjin@gzu.edu.cn - - -Author + + +Author -Ochoa, Ronald -Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA. +Ochoa, Ronald +Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA. - - -Author + + +Author -Yi, Tian-Ci -Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry Rural Affairs of Agriculture P. R. China, Guiyang 550025, China. +Yi, Tian-Ci +Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry Rural Affairs of Agriculture P. R. China, Guiyang 550025, China. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-23 + +2024 + +2024-07-23 - -5485 + +5485 - -1 + +1 - -201 -225 + +201 +225 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.14 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.14 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.14 -1175-5326 -D01DB406-09EF-4B3D-B353-ADEFD5E7419C +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.14 +1175-5326 +13209531 +D01DB406-09EF-4B3D-B353-ADEFD5E7419C @@ -80,7 +81,7 @@ He, Jin & Yi ( -Figs 1–15 +Figs 1–15 ) @@ -195,9 +196,9 @@ specimens are deposited at Gnathosoma . ( -Fig. 1 +Fig. 1 , -2A +2A ) Subcapitular setae m simple, @@ -208,7 +209,7 @@ simple, ul ʺ 5 (5–6). - + FIGURES 3–4. @@ -222,7 +223,7 @@ FIGURES 3–4. -FIGURES 3–4 +FIGURES 3–4 . (Continued) @@ -230,7 +231,7 @@ FIGURES 3–4. Idiosoma. ( -Figs 3, 4 +Figs 3, 4 ) Body including gnathosoma 428 (428−449) long; idiosoma 375 (361−375) long, 248 (248−260) wide, widest at posterior margin of propodosoma, narrowing at level of setae c 3 @@ -331,7 +332,7 @@ to h 1 usually present ( -Fig 4 +Fig 4 ); lengths of opisthodorsal setae: c 1 @@ -457,9 +458,9 @@ usually present ( Venter . ( -Figs 5, 6 +Figs 5, 6 , -7 +7 ). Striae longitudinal between setae m to @@ -469,7 +470,7 @@ to and dense round knots in lateral area of ventral idiosoma; all ventral setae slender except for 1c barbed ( -Fig 7 +Fig 7 ), setae 1a and @@ -487,7 +488,7 @@ flagellate. Lengths of setae: 48 (41−51), 4a–4a 26 (18–27); genital and ventral plates with flap of cuticle as shown in -Fig 6 +Fig 6 , bearing one pair of aggenital setae ag and two pairs of subequal setiform genital setae ( @@ -549,7 +550,7 @@ and Legs. ( -Fig. 8 +Fig. 8 ) Lengths of legs I–IV: 199 (188−201), 169 (160−169), 154 (141−154), 140 (131−145). Setal counts: I 2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 8+ω; II 2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 8+ω; III 1, 2, 2, 1, 3, 5; IV 1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 5. Most dorsal and lateral setae on trochanters, femora, genua and tibiae broadly obovate to narrowly lanceolate, the ventral setae pilose excepting setae on femora III–IV and trochanter III–IV slender, smooth or mostly smooth; setae ft ′ on tarsi I–IV flagelliform, much longer than others; @@ -568,9 +569,9 @@ pectinate and equal in length; lengths of solenidia: I Gnathosoma . ( -Figs. 9 +Figs. 9 , -2B +2B ) Subcapitular setae m pectinate, @@ -581,7 +582,7 @@ pectinate, ω″ 4–6. - + FIGURES 5–6. @@ -595,12 +596,12 @@ FIGURES 5–6. -FIGURES 5–6 +FIGURES 5–6 . (Continued) - + FIGURE 7. @@ -612,7 +613,7 @@ FIGURE 7. , female, setae 1c. - + FIGURE 8. @@ -870,9 +871,9 @@ to Venter . ( -Figs 12, 13 +Figs 12, 13 , -14 +14 ) Striae between seta m to @@ -896,7 +897,7 @@ flagellate; lengths: 37−45, 4a–4a 20–27; genital and ventral plates with flap of cuticles ( -Figs 12, 13 +Figs 12, 13 ), bearing one pair of aggenital setae ag and two pairs of subequal setiform genital setae ( @@ -918,7 +919,7 @@ and ps 3 slightly thickened than other pseudanal setae ( -Fig. 14 +Fig. 14 ); setae lengths: ag 9−17, @@ -966,13 +967,13 @@ slightly thickened than other pseudanal setae ( Aedeagus . ( -Fig. 14 +Fig. 14 ). Length 92−93, narrow, elongate and sclerotized. Legs . ( -Fig. 15 +Fig. 15 ). Lengths of legs I–IV: 160−171, 135−148, 123−132, 115−122; chaetotaxy: I 2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 8+2 ω ; II 2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 8+2 @@ -994,7 +995,7 @@ pectinate and equal in length; lengths of solenidia: I 9−11; claws pad-like with tenent hairs on each side. - + FIGURE 9. diff --git a/data/72/43/C3/7243C31306667745FF55F95EFB6E0481.xml b/data/72/43/C3/7243C31306667745FF55F95EFB6E0481.xml index 882465ba0b4..9c94d50114d 100644 --- a/data/72/43/C3/7243C31306667745FF55F95EFB6E0481.xml +++ b/data/72/43/C3/7243C31306667745FF55F95EFB6E0481.xml @@ -1,67 +1,68 @@ - - - -A new species of Ultratenuipalpus and redescription of Ultratenuipalpus hainanensis (Wang) (Acari, Tenuipalpidae) + + + +A new species of Ultratenuipalpus and redescription of Ultratenuipalpus hainanensis (Wang) (Acari, Tenuipalpidae) - - -Author + + +Author -He, Hu-Die -0009-0003-5441-8023 -Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry Rural Affairs of Agriculture P. R. China, Guiyang 550025, China. +He, Hu-Die +0009-0003-5441-8023 +Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry Rural Affairs of Agriculture P. R. China, Guiyang 550025, China. - - -Author + + +Author -Jin, Dao-Chao -Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry Rural Affairs of Agriculture P. R. China, Guiyang 550025, China. -dcjin@gzu.edu.cn +Jin, Dao-Chao +Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry Rural Affairs of Agriculture P. R. China, Guiyang 550025, China. +dcjin@gzu.edu.cn - - -Author + + +Author -Ochoa, Ronald -Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA. +Ochoa, Ronald +Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA. - - -Author + + +Author -Yi, Tian-Ci -Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry Rural Affairs of Agriculture P. R. China, Guiyang 550025, China. +Yi, Tian-Ci +Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guiyang 550025, China, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pest in Guiyang, Ministry Rural Affairs of Agriculture P. R. China, Guiyang 550025, China. -text - - -Zootaxa +text + + +Zootaxa - -2024 - -2024-07-23 + +2024 + +2024-07-23 - -5485 + +5485 - -1 + +1 - -201 -225 + +201 +225 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.14 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.14 -journal article -10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.14 -1175-5326 -D01DB406-09EF-4B3D-B353-ADEFD5E7419C +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.14 +1175-5326 +13209531 +D01DB406-09EF-4B3D-B353-ADEFD5E7419C @@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ ( -Figs 16–31 +Figs 16–31 ) @@ -282,7 +283,7 @@ University, Gnathosoma. ( -Fig. 16 +Fig. 16 ) Subcapitular setae m pectinate, @@ -293,9 +294,9 @@ pectinate, Idiosoma. ( -Figs 17 +Figs 17 , -18, 19 +18, 19 ) Red body with some irregular wrinkles. Idiosoma 337−391 long, 225−274 wide, widest at posterior margin of propodosoma, narrowing at level of setae c 3 @@ -396,7 +397,7 @@ to h 1 ( -Figs. 18, 19 +Figs. 18, 19 ). Lengths of opisthodorsal setae: c 1 @@ -522,7 +523,7 @@ to Venter. ( -Figs 20, 21 +Figs 20, 21 ). Striae longitudinal between seta m to @@ -607,7 +608,7 @@ and 2 7−9. - + FIGURES 12–13. @@ -621,12 +622,12 @@ FIGURES 12–13. -FIGURES 12–13 +FIGURES 12–13 . (Continued) - + FIGURE 14. @@ -638,7 +639,7 @@ FIGURE 14. , male, aedeagus. - + FIGURE 15. @@ -650,7 +651,7 @@ FIGURE 15. , male, A–D, legs I–IV. - + FIGURE 16. @@ -661,7 +662,7 @@ FIGURE 16. , female, gnathosoma. - + FIGURE 17. @@ -675,7 +676,7 @@ FIGURE 17. Legs ( -Fig 20 +Fig 20 ). Lengths of legs I–IV: 169−200, 143−166, 128−142, 120−148. Chaetotaxy: I 2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 8+ω; II 2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 8+ ω ; III 1, 2, 2, 1, 3, 5; IV 1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 5. Most dorsal and lateral setae on trochanters, femora, genua and tibiae lanceolate to obovate, ventral setae feathery excepting simple setae on femora III–IV and trochanters III–IV; setae @@ -708,7 +709,7 @@ pectinate, Idiosoma . ( -Fig. 22 +Fig. 22 ). Idiosoma 293−307 long, 191−214 wide, widest at posterior margin of propodosoma, narrowing abruptly at level of setae c 3 @@ -782,9 +783,9 @@ appears acicular and appears broadly lanceolate, in particular, one specimen shows an asymmetric form ( -Figs 22 +Figs 22 , -23A, B +23A, B ), d 1 @@ -949,7 +950,7 @@ to 1 19−21. - + FIGURES 18–19. @@ -960,7 +961,7 @@ FIGURES 18–19. , female, dorsum. - + FIGURES 20–21. @@ -971,7 +972,7 @@ FIGURES 20–21. , female, venter. - + FIGURE 22. @@ -985,7 +986,7 @@ FIGURE 22. Venter . ( -Fig. 24 +Fig. 24 ) Cuticle with fine transverse striae between 1a and @@ -1064,15 +1065,15 @@ modified as accessory genital stylets, thickened, spinelike, concealed beneath a Aedeagus . ( -Fig. 23C +Fig. 23C ). Length 81−82, narrow, elongate and sclerotized. Legs . ( -Fig. 25 +Fig. 25 ). Compared with females, males with extra solenidion on tarsi I–II ( -Fig. 25 +Fig. 25 ). Lengths of legs I–IV: 153−165, 127−140, 112−125, 117−123; setal counts: I 2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 8+2 ω ; II 2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 8+2 @@ -1109,7 +1110,7 @@ simple, Idiosoma . ( -Figs. 26, 27 +Figs. 26, 27 ). Idiosoma smaller than female, 329−397 long, 233−282 wide; prodorsal setae v 2 @@ -1169,7 +1170,7 @@ and are acicular and two specimens gradually become larger and lanceolate ( -Figs 26, 27 +Figs 26, 27 ). Lengths of opisthodorsal setae: c 1 @@ -1355,7 +1356,7 @@ absent. Setae lengths: Legs . ( -Fig. 28 +Fig. 28 ). Setal formula for legs I–IV same as adult female, except trochanters IV nude (seta v′ absent). Lengths of legs I–IV: 96−122, 82−95, 67−77, 57−67; chaetotaxy: I 2, 1, 4, 3, 5, 8+1 @@ -1388,7 +1389,7 @@ pectinate and equal in length; lengths of solenidia: I Idiosoma. ( -Fig. 29 +Fig. 29 ). Oval shape of body, measurements: 267−304 long, 206−226 wide; prodorsal setae same as deutonymph. Anterior margin of prodorsum with median-forked projection forming a broad notch. Lengths of prodorsal setae: v 2 @@ -1562,7 +1563,7 @@ and 1 16−17. - + FIGURE 23. @@ -1576,7 +1577,7 @@ FIGURE 23. ; C, aedaegus. - + FIGURE 24. @@ -1587,7 +1588,7 @@ FIGURE 24. , male, venter. - + FIGURE 25. @@ -1598,7 +1599,7 @@ FIGURE 25. , male, tarsi of legs I–II. - + FIGURES 26–27. @@ -1609,7 +1610,7 @@ FIGURES 26–27. , deutonymph, dorsum. - + FIGURE 28. @@ -1675,11 +1676,11 @@ does not extend beyond the edge of opisthosoma. Setae lengths: Legs . ( -Fig. 30 +Fig. 30 ). Compared to deutonymph, setae similar to deutonymph in form, except for narrowly lanceolate setae of l′ on trochanter III ( -Fig. 31 +Fig. 31 ). All typical 13 setae are absent on legs I–IV in protonymph— v′ , diff --git a/data/9F/02/AC/9F02AC77FFBB581014E9F8D4D1AFFE2A.xml b/data/9F/02/AC/9F02AC77FFBB581014E9F8D4D1AFFE2A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..558b8860f7a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/9F/02/AC/9F02AC77FFBB581014E9F8D4D1AFFE2A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ + + + +A new species of the genus Rambutanura Deharveng, 1988 from southern Vietnam (Collembola, Neanuridae) + + + +Author + +Babenko, Anatoly +The Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119071, Russia + + + +Author + +Antipova, Maria +0000-0002-3517-9720 +The Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119071, Russia +antimar.2410@gmail.com + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-24 + + +5486 + + +1 + + +142 +150 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.7 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5486.1.7 +1175-5326 +25439543-6213-4A86-968C-676868FA0470 + + + + + + +Key to species of the genus + +Rambutanura +Deharveng, 1988 + + + + + +(modified from + +Dong +et al +. 2018 + +) + + + + + +1 Mandible comblike with more than 12 teeth and an additional ramus divided apically into few branches................ 2 + + +- Mandible with at most 6–7 teeth and without additional ramus................................................. 4 + + + + +2 At least some of dorsal tubercles on head and thorax prolong, finger-shaped....................................... 3 + + + +- Finger-shaped tubercles developed only on the last three abdominal segments........................ + +R. oblita + + +sp. nov +. + + + + + + + +3 Th. I without finger-shaped tubercles; tubercles De and Dl on Abd. I–III are not elongated; mandible with more than 22 small teeth besides a large basal one...................................................... + +R. dawydoffi +( +Denis, 1934 +) + + + + + +- Th. I with finger-shaped tubercles; tubercles De and Dl on Abd. I–III finger-shaped; mandible with 17–19 small teeth and a large basal one................................................................... + +R. malayana +( +Yosii, 1976 +) + + + + + + + +4 All body tubercles prominent, but not finger-shaped; tubercles Di on Th. I–Abd. IV with sensilla............................................................................................... + +R. hunanensis +Jiang & +Dong, 2018 + + + + +- Most of dorsal tubercles on the terga finger-shaped; tubercles Di without sensilla.................................. 5 + + + + + +5 Mandible with 6–7 teeth; tubercle Di on Th. I–Abd. IV finger-shaped; tubercles L on Abd. I–III with 4, 4 and 5 sensilla, respectively................................................................. + +R. yoshiiana +Deharveng, 1988 + + + + + +- Mandible with 3 teeth; tubercle Di on Th. I–Abd. IV not finger-shaped; each tubercles L on Abd. I–III with only one sensillum....................................................................... + +R. carcharia +Smolis, 2007 + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/B1/1F/FC/B11FFC41FFDC730EFF50FA74FC37766C.xml b/data/B1/1F/FC/B11FFC41FFDC730EFF50FA74FC37766C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..85d25df24c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/B1/1F/FC/B11FFC41FFDC730EFF50FA74FC37766C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,661 @@ + + + +Ontogenetic instars of Basilobelba werneri Mahunka, 1982 (Acari, Oribatida, Basilobelbidae) + + + +Author + +Ermilov, Sergey G. +Tyumen State University, Institute of Environmental and Agricultural Biology (X-BIO), Tyumen, Russia. + + + +Author + +Lindquist, Evert E. +40 Barnes Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, K 2 H 7 C 2, Canada. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-23 + + +5485 + + +1 + + +92 +105 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.9 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.9 +1175-5326 +13209643 +89C0CE29-9D4C-4217-84BA-C163CD4A34EE + + + + + + + +Basilobelba werneri +Mahunka, 1982 + + + + + + + +( +Figs 1–9 +) + + +Supplementary description of adult. +Measurements +( +eight males +, +10 females +). Body length: 600–690; notogastral width: 435–480. No clear difference between females and males in body size. + + +Integument +( +Figs 4A–D +; +5A–F +). Body color light brown to brown. Body and leg surface with dense microtuberculate sculpturing, covered by thick layer of cerotegument consisting of dense bacillar and tuberculate components forming partially microreticulate ornamentation (well visible in dissected specimens). + + +Prodorsum +( +Figs 1A, B +; +2B +; +4A–D +; +5A, C, D +). Rostrum narrowed, nearly pointed. Rostral region with median, longitudinally elongate bulge. Transverse ridge between lamellar setae. Costula and lateral carina well observable. Transversely elongate tubercle between interlamellar setae. Rostral seta (82–94) slightly thickened, acute, barbed; lamellar (105–112) and interlamellar (64–75) setae thick, narrowed distally, heavily barbed; bothridial seta (315– 332) setiform, barbed; bothridium with longitudinal depression medially; exobothridial seta (22–26) setiform, slightly barbed. + + +Notogaster and nymphal exuvial scalps +( +Figs 1A–C +; +2A–E +; +4A–D +; +5A, C +). Dorsosejugal furrow narrow and deep; anterior notogastral margin straight. Anterior part of notogaster depressed. Eight pairs of setiform, slightly barbed notogastral setae present in typical pattern ( +la +, +lm +, +h +2 +, +h +3 +: 13–15; +h +1 +, +p +1 +, +p +2 +, +p +3 +: 22–26); sometimes alveolus of seta +c +and extra seta in +p +-row ( +p +*) developed; setae +h +1 +and +p +1 +located close to each other. Opisthonotal gland opening and all lyrifissures well observable in transmitted light. Nymphal exuvial scalps reticulate, with nine pairs (frequently broken) of setiform, roughened setae ( +c +1 +, +c +2 +, +la +, +lm +, +lp +, +h +1 +, +h +2 +, +h +3 +, +p +1 +: 15–26, except +c +1 +and +c +2 +up to +34 in +tritonymphal exuvial scalp); tritonymphal scalp with typical attachment arches (span distance larger than distance between bothridia) bearing setae +c +1 +and +c +2 +. Apical part of cornicle in protonymphal exuvial scalp brush-like distally versus smooth in deuto- and tritonymphal exuvial scalps. + + +Gnathosoma +( +Figs 3A–C +; +5B +). Subcapitulum size: 165–169 × 112–120; subcapitular setae ( +a +: 49–52; +m +, +h +: 64–71) setiform, barbed; two pairs of adoral setae (15) setiform, roughened. Palp length: 94–101; formula: 0-2- 1-3-8(+ω); seta +lt” +absent; solenidion long, bacilliform; postpalpal seta (9) spiniform, smooth. Chelicera length: 150–161; setae ( +cha +: 45–49; +chb +: 30–34) setiform, barbed. + + +Epimeral region +( +Figs 2A, B +; +5B +). Epimeral setal formula: 3-1-3-3; setae ( +1a +, +2a +, +3a +: 52–64; +1b +, +1c +, +4b +: 71–75; +3b +, +3c +, +4a +, +4c +: 86–97) setiform, barbed; setae +3b +and +3c +located at the base of small tubercle. + + +Anogenital region +( +Figs 1C +; +2A, B +; +5B +). Six pairs of genital (52–64), three pairs of aggenital (52–64), two pairs of anal (37–45), and five pairs of adanal (52–64) setae setiform, barbed; all adanal setae in ventromarginal position. Adanal lyrifissure close and parallel to anal plate. + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Basilobelba werneri +Mahunka, 1982 + +, adult: A—dorsal view (larval, proto- and deutonymphal exuvial scalps omitted); B—notogaster and basal part of prodorsum, dorsal view (exuvial scalps omitted); C—posterior view (exuvial scalps omitted). Scale bar 100 μm. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Basilobelba werneri +Mahunka, 1982 + +, adult: A—ventral view (gnathosoma and legs omitted); B—right lateral view (exuvial scalps, gnathosoma and legs omitted); C—protonymphal exuvial scalp (setae broken), anterior view; D—protonymphal exuvial scalp (some setae broken), posterior view; E—deuto- and tritonymphal exuvial scalps (some setae broken), posterolateral view. Scale bar 100 μm, A, B; C–E to same scale. + + + +Legs +( +Figs 3D–G +; +4A–D +; +5A, B, E, F +). Claw of all legs comparatively thin, slightly roughened dorsally, with slight tubercle ventrobasally. Formulas of leg setation and solenidia: I (1-5-4-5-20) [1-2-2], II (1-5-4-5-14) [1-1-2], III (2-3-2-4-13) [1-1-0], IV (1-3-2-4-10) [0-1-0]; homology of setae and solenidia indicated in +Table 1 +. Famulus medium-sized, rod-like; setae +p’ +, +p” +and +s +on tarsus I eupathidial; setae +p’ +and +p” +on tarsi II–III absent; all or some setae on leg segments thick, narrowed distally, heavily barbed; solenidion ω +2 +on tarsus I medium-sized, rod-like versus other solenidia short or medium-sized, slightly bacilliform (in addition, φ +2 +on tibia I slightly dilated mediodistally). + + +Description of juvenile instars. +Measurements +. Total length of larva: 390, 405 (n=2), protonymph: 425–450 (n=3), deutonymph: 510–525 (n=6), tritonymph: 570–600 (n=4). Total width of larva: 210, 225 (n=2), protonymph: 270–300 (n=3), deutonymph: 345–360 (n=6), tritonymph: 375–420 (n=4). + + +Integument +( +Figs 9A–D +). Body colorless to light yellowish. Body and leg surface with slight microtuberculate and striate sculpturing, covered by thick layer of cerotegument consisting of dense bacillar and tuberculate components forming partially microreticulate ornamentation; dorsosejugal region under interbothridial tectum densely microfoveolate. + + + +FIGURE 3. + +Basilobelba werneri +Mahunka, 1982 + +, adult: A—subcapitulum, ventral view; B—palp, right, antiaxial view; C— chelicera, left, paraxial view; D—leg I, right, antiaxial view; E—leg II, right, antiaxial view; F—leg III, left, antiaxial view; G—leg IV, left, antiaxial view. Scale bars 20 μm (A–C), 50 μm (D–G). + + + +Prodorsum +( +Figs 6A, C +; +7A–C +; +9A–D +). Relatively short, about 2/3 of gastronotic region. Rostrum pointed. Dorsolateral region with arcuate carina (most likely, vestigial costula in adult); lateral side with thin carina (most likely, vestigial lateral carina in adult). Interbothridial region with narrow transverse tectum covering partially dorsosejugal furrow. Rostral seta (LA: 37–41; PN: 49–52; DN: 56–60; TN: 56–64) slightly thickened, acute, barbed, inserted on distinct tubercle; lamellar seta (LA: 52–56; PN: 64–71; DN: 71–79; TN: 79–94) thickened, acute, heavily barbed, inserted on distinct tubercle; interlamellar and exobothridial setae (LA: 26–30; PN: 30–34; DN: 34–37; TN: 34–41) setiform, slightly barbed; bothridial seta (LA: 131–142; PN: 150–161; DN: 184–210; TN: 210–232) with long, sparsely barbed stalk and shorter, slightly thickened distal part bearing numerous short cilia; bothridium with longitudinal depression medially. + + + +FIGURE 4. + +Basilobelba werneri +Mahunka, 1982 + +, adult, SEM micrographs: A—dorsal view (larval, proto- and deutonymphal exuvial scalps omitted); B—dorsoanterior view (larval, proto- and deutonymphal exuvial scalps omitted; tritonymphal scalp shifted); C—right lateral view (larval exuvial scalp omitted); D—right dorsolateral view (larval, proto- and deutonymphal exuvial scalps omitted; tritonymphal scalp shifted). + + + + +FIGURE 5. + +Basilobelba werneri +Mahunka, 1982 + +, adult, SEM micrographs: A—dorsoanterior view (exuvial scalps omitted); B—ventral view (larval, proto- and deutonymphal exuvial scalps omitted; tritonymphal scalp shifted); C—part of dorsosejugal region (some seta broken); D—surface and cerotegument on prodorsum; E—distal part of leg I (some seta broken), right, antiaxial view; G—distal part of leg II (some seta broken), right, paraxial view. + + + + +FIGURE 6. + +Basilobelba werneri +Mahunka, 1982 + +, larva: A—dorsal view (legs omitted); B—ventral view (legs omitted); C— right lateral view (legs omitted). Scale bar 50 μm. + + + +Gastronotic region +( +Figs 6A–C +; +7A–C, G–I +; +9A, B +). Nymphal instars with typical bent cornicle in medioposterior part. Tritonymphal instar with median tubercle. Larva with 11 ( +dp +absent), nymphal instars with 12 ( +da +, +dm +and +dp +absent) pairs of setae. Length of gastronotic setae: LA: +c +1 +, +h +3 +: 26–30, +c +2 +: 15–19, +c +3 +: 13–15, +da +: 37–41, +dm +: 52–60, +la +, +lm +, +lp +, +h +1 +, +h +2 +: 101–120; PN: +c +1 +, +h +1 +: 26–34, +c +2 +: 19, +c +3 +: 13–15, +la +, +lm +, +lp +: 26–30, +p +1 +, +h +2 +, +h +3 +: 19–22, +p +2 +, +p +3 +: 13–15; DN: +c +1 +, +h +1 +: 30–34, +c +2 +: 19–22, +c +3 +: 15, +la +, +lm +, +lp +: 26–30, +p +1 +, +h +2 +, +h +3 +: 19–22, +p +2 +, +p +3 +: 15–19; TN: +c +1 +, +h +1 +: 30–34, +c +2 +: 22, +c +3 +: 17–19, +la +, +lm +, +lp +: 26–30, +p +1 +, +p +2 +, +p +3 +, +h +2 +, +h +3 +: 19–22. In larval instar, setae +c +1 +, +da +and +dm +slightly thickened, acute, barbed, located on porose sclerites; +c +2 +, +c +3 +and +h +3 +setiform, slightly barbed; +la +, +lm +, +lp +, +h +1 +, and +h +2 +thick, narrowed distally, heavily barbed. In nymphal instar, all setae setiform, slightly barbed. Opisthonotal gland opening and all cupules distinct. + + + +FIGURE 7. + +Basilobelba werneri +Mahunka, 1982 + +, juvenile instars: A—protonymph, dorsal view (exuvial scalps omitted); B— deutonymph, dorsal view (exuvial scalps omitted); C—tritonymph, dorsal view (exuvial scalps omitted); D—subcapitulum (lips with adoral setae omitted), ventral view; E—palp, right, paraxial view; F—chelicera, left, paraxial view; G—protonymph, ventral view (gnathosoma and legs except trochanters omitted); H—deutonymph, ventral view (gnathosoma and legs except trochanters omitted); I—tritonymph, ventral view (gnathosoma and legs except trochanters omitted). Scale bars 100 μm (A–C, G–I), 50 μm (D–F). + + + + +FIGURE 8. + +Basilobelba werneri +Mahunka, 1982 + +, juvenile instars: A—leg I of larva, right, antiaxial view; B—leg III of larva, left, antiaxial view; C—leg I of deutonymph, right, antiaxial view; D—leg II of deutonymph, right, antiaxial view; E—leg III of deutonymph, left, antiaxial view; F—leg IV of deutonymph, right, antiaxial view. Scale bar 50 μm, the following groups to same scale: A, B; C–F. + + + + +FIGURE 9. + +Basilobelba werneri +Mahunka, 1982 + +, deutonymph, SEM micrographs: A, B—dorsal view (larval exuvial scalp omitted); C—basal part of prodorsum, right part; D—distal part of bothridial seta. + + + +Gnathosoma +( +Figs 7E–F +). Subcapitulum size: LA: 82–86 × 64–67; PN: 105–109 × 75–82; DN: 124–127 × 90– 97; TN: 146–154 × 97–105; length of subcapitular seta +a +: LA: 24–28; PN: 34–37; DN: 36–45; TN: 49–52; length of subcapitular seta +m +: LA: 24–28; PN: 34–37; DN: 41–49; TN: 52–56; length of subcapitular seta +h +: LA: 19–22; PN: 30–34; DN: 34–41; TN: 41–49; +a +and +m +setiform, barbed; +h +narrowly phylliform, narrowed distally; posterolateral tectum of subcapitular mentum well developed; length of adoral setae: LA, PN: 5; DN, TN: 7; both adoral setae setiform, smooth. Palp length: LA: 49; PN: 60–64; DN: 64–71; TN: 79–82; palp formula in LA: 0-1-1-3-8(+ω); palp formula in PN, DN, TN: 0-2-1-3-8(+ω); length of postpalpal seta: LA: 4; PN: 5; DN, TN: 7. Chelicera length: LA: 82–86; PN: 105–109; DN: 109–116; TN: 123–139; length of +cha +: LA: 30; PN: 30–34; DN: 34–36; TN: 41–49; length of +chb +: LA: 19; PN: 19–22; DN: 22–26; TN: 26–30. + + +Epimeral region +( +Figs 6B, C +; +7G–I +). Setal formulas for epimeres: larva: 3-1-2 ( +1c +as typical scale covering Claparède’s organ); protonymph 3-1-2-1; deutonymph 3-1-3-2, tritonymph 3-1-3-3. Length of setae: LA: +1a +, +2a +, +3a +: 15–19, +1b +, +3b +: 19–22; PN: +1a +, +2a +, +3a +: 11–15, +1c +: 7; +1b +, +3b +, +4a +: 19–22; DN, TN: +1a +, +2a +, +3a +: 11–15, +1c +: 7–9; +1b +, +3b +, +3c +, +4a +, +4b +: 19–22; setae +1a +, +2a +and +3a +slightly phylliform, narrowed distally, +1c +simple, others setiform, roughened. + + +Anogenital region +( +Figs 6B, C +; +7G–I +). Ontogeny of genital (PN, DN: 15–19; TN: 19–22), aggenital (DN: 15–19; TN: 19–26), anal (TN: 15–22), and adanal (DN: 15–19; TN: 19–22) setal formulas, larva to tritonymph: 0- 1-3-5, 0-0-1-3, 0-0-0-2, 0-0-3-3, respectively; all setae setiform, roughened; small round porose area at the base of adanal setae. Adanal cupule distinct; anal cupule not observed. + + +Legs +( +Figs 8A–F +; +9A, B +). Claw of all legs comparatively thin, slightly roughened dorsally. Formulas of leg setation and solenidia: larva I (0-2-3-4-16) [1-1-1], II (0-2-3-3-13) [1-1-1], III (0-2-2-2-13) [1-1-0]; protonymph I (1-3-3-4-16) [1-1-2], II (1-3-3-3-13) [1-1-1], III (1-3-2-2-13) [1-1-0], IV (0-0-0-0-7) [0-0-0]; deutonymph I (1-4-3- 4-16) [1-2-2], II (1-4-3-4-13) [1-1-2], III (2-3-2-3-13) [1-1-0], IV (1-2-2-2-12) [0-1-0]; tritonymph I (1-5-4-5-16) [1-2-2], II (1-5-4-5-13) [1-1-2], III (2-3-2-4-13) [1-1-0], IV (1-3-2-4-12) [0-1-0]; homology of setae and solenidia indicated in +Table 1 +. Famulus medium-sized, rod-like; all or some setae on leg segments thick, narrowed distally, heavily barbed; solenidion ω +2 +on tarsus I medium-sized, rod-like versus other solenidia short or medium-sized, slightly bacilliform (in addition, φ +2 +on tibia I slightly dilated mediodistally). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/E9/76/87/E97687DDFFBA901010FCC448FE5CFC5F.xml b/data/E9/76/87/E97687DDFFBA901010FCC448FE5CFC5F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..50bdd1f2f67 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/E9/76/87/E97687DDFFBA901010FCC448FE5CFC5F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,950 @@ + + + +Ontogenetic instars of the oribatid mite Eupterotegaeus nortoni sp. nov. (Acari, Oribatida, Cepheusidae) from U. S. A. + + + +Author + +Ermilov, Sergey G. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-23 + + +5485 + + +1 + + +49 +61 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.6 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.6 +1175-5326 +13209609 +F4508429-0996-45AD-B786-03CC547E9065 + + + + + + + +Eupterotegaeus nortoni + +sp. nov. + + + + + + +( +Figs 1–6 +) + + + + +Diagnosis. +Adult +. Body length: 615–630. Body surface with microtuberculate sculpturing; centrodorsal part of notogaster sparsely foveolate. Rostral and interlamellar regions with medium-sized tooth each. Lamellar cusps well separated, narrowed and slightly serrated mediodistally, without toothlike process. Rostral and lamellar setae setiform, slightly swollen basally, roughened; +ro +short, located on tubercle, +le +medium-sized; interlamellar seta short, setiform, slightly swollen basally, slightly roughened; bothridial seta medium-sized, with elongate, flattened, rounded apically, slightly or well developed, barbed head. Interbothridial region with two tubercles. Ten pairs of notogastral setae short, setiform, slightly swollen basally, slightly roughened, located on distinct tubercles; +c +shorter and thinner than others. Enantiophysis on epimere 4 well developed. Leg trochanters III and IV with tooth dorsoanteriorly. + + + + +Description of adult. +Measurements +. Body length: 615 ( +holotype +, female), 615–630 ( +11 female +paratypes +); notogastral width: 420 ( +holotype +), 390–420 ( +paratypes +). + + +Integument +( +Figs 1A–D +; +3A, C–G +). Body color brown to dark brown. Body and legs covered by thick layer of cerotegument; its internal layer uniform, netlike reticulate (mostly hexagonal; +Fig. 3D +), but the outer layer gel-like with microtubercular and bacillar structures. Surface microtuberculate sculpturing ( +Fig. 3G +). Centrodorsal part of notogaster, partially lamella, tutorium, lateral side of prodorsum, region near anal aperture, anterior part of epimere I foveolate; notogastral foveolae medium-sized (up to 11), sparsely located. + + +Prodorsum +( +Figs 1A–C +; +2A +; +3A–D, F +). Rostrum rounded. Rostral region with strong, erect tooth (26–30). Lamellar cusps well separated, narrowed, sometimes slightly serrated mediodistally, without toothlike process; lamellae connected medially with strong, erect interlamellar tooth (26–30). Translamella absent. Tutorium with triangular cusp. Rostral (22–26) and lamellar (52–60) setae setiform, slightly swollen basally, roughened, directed medially; +ro +inserted on distinct tubercle; interlamellar seta (15) setiform, thin, erect, slightly swollen basally, slightly roughened; bothridial seta (82–90) with long stalk and short, elongate, flattened, rounded apically, slightly or well developed, barbed head. Exobothridial seta not observed. Interbothridial region with two tubercles located close to each other. Postbothridial region with tubercle. + + +Notogaster +( +Figs 1A–D +; +3A, C, D, F, G +). Humeral process well developed, pointed. Notogaster with band-like depression that circularly border convex central region. Ten pairs of notogastral setae present, all ( +c +: 15; +p +2 +, +p +3 +: 19; others: 22–24) setiform, thin, erect, slightly swollen basally, slightly roughened, inserted on distinct tubercles; +c +thinner than others. Opisthonotal gland opening and all lyrifissures distinct. + + + +Gnathosoma + +( +Figs 2B–D +). Subcapitulum size: 139–143 × 79–86; subcapitular ( +a +: 22–26; +m +, +h +: 19–22) and adoral (7–11) setae setiform, slightly roughened. Palp length: 79–82; postpalpal seta (7) spiniform, smooth. Chelicera length: 135–143; setae ( +cha +: 32–34; +chb +: 26) setiform, barbed. + + +Epimeral and podosomal regions +( +Figs 1B, C +; +3E, F +). Epimeral setae +3c +, +4c +(45–56) setiform, slightly swollen basally, roughened; +1a +, +2a +, +3a +, +1c +(13–15), +1b +, +3b +, +4a +, +4b +(22–26) setiform, thin, erect, slightly swollen basally, slightly roughened; +4a +located at the base of tubercle. Enantiophysis on epimere 4 well developed, represented by simple anterior tubercle and triangular posterior tubercle. Basal part of pedotectum I with strong tooth. Discidium triangular, pointed. + + +Anogenital region +( +Figs 1B–D +; +3E, F +). Genital (15–19), aggenital (19–22), anal (19–22), and adanal (19–22) setae setiform, thin, erect, slightly swollen basally, slightly roughened. Adanal lyrifissure distinct. + + +Legs +( +Figs 2E–H +; +3E, F +). Heterotridactylous; all claws slightly barbed on dorsal side. Trochanters III and IV with tooth dorsoanteriorly. Formulas of leg setation and solenidia: I (1-4-3-4-20) [1-2-2], II (1-4-3-4-16) [1-1-2], III (2-3-2-3-15) [1-1-0], IV (1-2-3-3-12) [0-1-0]; homology of setae and solenidia indicated in +Table 1 +. Famulus short, slightly swollen and blunt distally, located between solenidion ω +1 +and seta +ft” +; seta +s +eupathidial; solenidia ω +1 +and ω +2 +on tarsi I, II medium-sized, bacilliform; solenidia φ +1 +on tibia I and σ on genua I long, subflagellate; other solenidia medium-sized, rod-like. + + +Description of juvenile instars. +Measurements +. Total length of larva: 285 (n=1), protonymph: 330–390 (n=3), deutonymph: 405–465 (n=2), tritonymph: 495–585 (n=3). Total width of larva: 150, protonymph: 165–210, deutonymph: 240–285, tritonymph: 350–375. + + +Integument +( +Figs 5B–F +; +6A, B, D +). Body colorless (LA) to light yellowish (PN, DN, TN). Body surface indistinctly porose and partially covered by gel-like and sparsely microtuberculate cerotegument; additionally, epimeral and anogenital region partially folded. Exuvial scalps foveolate. + + +Prodorsum +( +Figs 4A–C +; +6A, B, D +). About 1/2 (in larva and protonymph) of gastronotic region. Rostrum broadly rounded. Centrodorsal region with two longitudinal carinae connected by transverse carina. Rostral seta (LA: 30; PN: 30–34; DN: 34–41; TN: 45–52) phylliform, slightly narrowed and rounded distally, slightly barbed, inserted on tubercle in LA versus narrowly phylliform, pointed, slightly barbed, inserted on tubercle in PN, DN, TN; lamellar seta (LA: 22) phylliform, slightly narrowed and rounded distally, slightly barbed, inserted on tubercle in LA versus very broad, reticulate, slightly barbed, inserted on tubercle in PN, DN, TN; interlamellar seta (LA: 22; PN: 15–19; DN: 22; TN: 26) phylliform, slightly narrowed and rounded distally, slightly barbed, inserted on tubercle in LA versus setiform, erect, slightly barbed, inserted on tubercle in PN, DN, TN; bothridial seta (LA: 82; PN: 112– 116; DN: 124–130; TN: 142–146) thickened, indistinctly dilated mediodistally, narrowed distally, densely barbed; exobothridial seta (LA: 4; PN: 4; DN: 6; TN: 7–11) setiform, roughened, inserted on small (LA) or large (PN, DN, TN) tubercle. + + +Gastronotic region +( +Figs 4A–D +; +5E, F +; +6A–D +). With slight apophysis in posterior part in LA and PN. Centrodorsal region with strong tubercle ( +Fig. 4D +; performing the function of holding exuvial scalps of previous instars) in PN, DN, TN. Twelve pairs of gastronotic setae in all instars. Length of gastronotic setae (except broadly phylliform): LA: +c +1 +: 56, +c +2 +: 30, +da +: 82, +dm +: 90, +dp +: 101, +h +1 +: 61, +h +2 +: 22, +h +3 +: 13; PN: +c +1 +: 15, +h +1 +: 52, +p +1 +: 22, +p +2 +: 19–22, +p +3 +: 15; DN: +c +1 +: 15, +h +1 +: 56, +p +2 +: 30–37, +p +3 +: 19–22; TN: +c +1 +: 15, +h +1 +: 60, +p +2 +: 37–45, +p +3 +: 22–30. In LA, setae +c +1 +, +c +2 +, +da +, +dm +, +dp +narrowly phylliform, pointed, reticulate, slightly barbed, inserted on tubercles, +h +2 +, +h +3 +setiform, erect, slightly roughened, other setae very broad, reticulate, slightly barbed, inserted on tubercles; in PN, DN, TN, +c +1 +setiform, slightly barbed, +h +1 +(and +p + +1 +in + +PN) narrowly phylliform, pointed, slightly barbed, inserted on tubercles, +p +2 +, +p +3 +setiform, erect, slightly roughened, other setae very broad, reticulate, slightly barbed, inserted on tubercles. Opisthonotal gland opening and all cupules distinct in transmitted light. Exuvial scalps with nine pairs of setae; nymphal scalps with median hole. + + + +TABLE 1. +Development of leg setation of + +Eupterotegaeus nortoni + +sp. nov. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Instar +Tr + +Fe + +Ge + +Ti + +Ta +
Leg I
LA- +d, bv” + +(l), d +σ + +(l), v’, d +φ1 + +(ft), (tc), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv), (pl), +ɛ, ω1 +
PN- +- + +- + +- +ω2
DN- +(l) + +- +φ2-
TN +v’ + +- + +v’ + +v” + +(it) +
AD-- +-d + +-d + +v’, l” +
Leg II
LA- +d, bv” + +(l), d +σ + +l’, v’, d +φ + +(ft), (tc), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv), +ω 1 +
PN- +- + +- + +- + +- +
DN- +(l) + +- +-ω2
TN +v’ + +- + +v’ + +l” + +(it) +
AD-- +-d + +v”, -d + +l” +
Leg III
LA- +d, ev’ + +l’, d +σ + +v’, d +φ + +(ft), (tc), (p), (u), (a), s, (pv) +
PN- +- + +- + +- + +- +
DN +v’ + +l’ +-- +- +
TN +l’ + +- + +- + +l’, v” + +(it) +
TN-- +v’, -d + +-d +-
Leg IV
PN- +- + +- + +- + +ft”, (p), (u), (pv) +
DN- +d, ev’ + +d + +v’, d +φ + +(tc), (a), s +
TN +v’ + +- + +l’ + +v”, l’ +-
AD-- +v’ + +-d +-
+ + +Note: Roman letters refer to normal setae; Greek letters refer to solenidia (except ɛ—famulus); juxtaposition of seta +d +with solenidion indicates coupling. Single quotation mark ( +’ +) designates setae on the anterior and double quotation ( +” +) setae on the posterior side of a given leg segment; parentheses indicate addition of both members of a pseudosymmetrical pair. Setae and solenidia are listed for the instar in which they first appear and should be presumed present for the remainder of ontogeny. + + + +Gnathosoma + +( +Figs 4E–G +). Subcapitulum size: LA: 56 × 37; PN: 64 × 45; DN: 75 × 56; TN: 105 × 75; length of setae +a +and +h +: LA and PN: 11; DN: 15; TN: 22; length of seta +m +: LA and PN: 4; DN: 7; TN: 9; length of adoral seta: LA and PN: 4; DN: 5; TN: 7; all setae setiform, slightly roughened. Palp length: LA: 30; PN: 45; DN: 52; TN: 71; length of postpalpal seta: LA: 2; PN: 4; DN: 7; TN: 11; second seta on femur added in PN. Chelicera length: LA: 56; PN: 64; DN: 75; TN: 105; length of +cha +: LA: 15; PN: 19; DN: 22; TN: 26; length of +chb +: LA: 11; PN: 13; DN: 15; TN: 19; all setae setiform, barbed. + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Eupterotegaeus nortoni + + +sp. nov. + +, adult (gnathosoma and legs not shown): A—dorsal view; B—ventral view; C— right lateral view; D—posterior view. Scale bar 100 μm. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Eupterotegaeus nortoni + + +sp. nov. + +, adult: A—bothridial setae; B—subcapitulum, ventral view; C—palp, left, paraxial view; D—chelicera, right, antiaxial view; E—leg I, right, antiaxial view; F—leg II, right, antiaxial view; G—leg III, left, antiaxial view; H—leg IV, left, antiaxial view. Scale bar 20 μm (A–D), 50 μm (E–H). + + + + +FIGURE 3. + +Eupterotegaeus nortoni + + +sp. nov. + +, adult, SEM micrographs: A, C—dorsal view (cerotegument removed); B—distal parts of cusps of lamellae; D—dorsal view (outer layer of cerotegument removed); E—ventral view (cerotegument removed); F—right lateral view (cerotegument removed); G—surface and some seta in posterior part of notogaster. + + + + +FIGURE 4. + +Eupterotegaeus nortoni + + +sp. nov. + +, juvenile instars: A—larva, dorsal view; B—protonymph, dorsal view; C— tritonymph, dorsal view; D—tritonymph, medial notogastral tubercle, lateral view; E—tritonymph, subcapitulum, ventral view; F—palp, left, paraxial view; G—tritonymph, chelicera, left, paraxial view; H—tritonymph, leg I, right, antiaxial view; I—leg IV, left, antiaxial view. Scale bars 20 μm (E–G), 50 μm (A, D, H, I), 100 μm (B, C). + + + + +FIGURE 5. + +Eupterotegaeus nortoni + + +sp. nov. + +, juvenile instars: A—larva, ventral view; B—protonymph, ventral view; C— deutonymph, ventral view; D—tritonymph, ventral view; E—larval scalp; F—protonymphal scalp. Scale bars 50 μm (A, E), 100 μm (B, C–D, F). + + + +Epimeral region +( +Figs 5A–D +). Setal formulas for epimeres: larva: 3-1-2 ( +1c +as typical scale covering Claparède’s organ); protonymph: 3-1-2-1; deutonymph: 3-1-2-2, tritonymph: 3-1-3-3. Length of setae: LA and PN: +1b +, +3b +: 9–11, others: 5–7; DN: +1b +, +3b +: 13–15, others: 9–11; TN: +1b +, +3b +: 19–22, others: 11–15; all setae setiform, thin, slightly roughened. + + + +FIGURE 6. + +Eupterotegaeus nortoni + + +sp. nov. + +, juvenile instars, SEM micrographs: A, B—tritonymph, dorsal view; C—some setae in posterior parts of proto- and deutonymphal exuvial scalps in tritonymph; D—protonymph, dorsal view. + + + +Anogenital region +( +Figs 5A–D +). Ontogeny of genital (PN: 5–7; DN: 7–11; TN: 11–15), aggenital (DN: 11; TN: 15–19), anal (TN: 7–15), and adanal (DN: 11–15; TN: 15–19) setal formulas, proto- to tritonymphs: 1-3-5, 0- 1-1, 0-0-2, 0-3-3, respectively; all setae setiform, thin, slightly roughened. Adanal cupule distinct; anal cupule not observed. + + +Legs +( +Figs 4H, I +). Claw of each leg dorsally slightly barbed. Formulas of leg setation and solenidia: LA I (0- 2-3-4-16) [1-1-1], II (0-2-3-3-13) [1-1-1], III (0-2-2-2-13) [1-1-0]; PN: I (0-2-3-4-16) [1-1-2], II (0-2-3-3-13) [1- 1-1], III (0-2-2-2-13) [1-1-0]; IV (0–0–0–0–7) [0–0–0]; DN: I (0–4–3–4–16) [1–2–2], II (0–4–3–3–13) [1–1–2], III (1–3–2–2–13) [1–1–0], IV (0–2–1–2–12) [0–1–0]; TN: I (1–4–4–5–18) [1–2–2], II (1–4–4–4–15) [1–1–2], III (2–3–2–4–15) [1–1–0], IV (1–2–2–4–12) [0–1–0]; homologies of setae and solenidia indicated in +Table 1 +. + + + + +Type material. + +Holotype +(female) and +nine adult +paratypes +(all females): +USA +, +New York +, + +St. Lawrence Co. +, E + +side of +Silver Lake +, just N of +US +, Rt. 3, +Cranberry +, +Lake village +, +44º13.6'N +, +74º49.3'W +, + +470 m + +elev., moss, lichens from bark on rotting logs and stumps in northern hardwood, hemlock forest, + +9.VIII.2013 + +(leg. +R +. +A. Norton +). + + + +Two adult +paratypes +and + +nine juvenile +instars ( +one larva +, three protonymphs, two deutonymphs, three tritonymphs): +USA +, +New York +, +St. Lawrence Co. +nr. +Oswegatchie River +, without habitat data, + +14.VII.1973 + +(leg. +T +. Finger) + +. + + +The +holotype +is deposited in the collection of the Senckenberg Museum of Natural History, Görlitz, +Germany +; + +11 paratypes +and all juvenile instars are deposited in the collection of the +Tyumen State +University Museum of Zoology +, +Tyumen +, +Russia + +. All specimens are preserved in 70% solution of ethanol with a drop of glycerol. + + + + +Etymology. +This species is named in honor of Dr. Roy A. Norton, Professor emeritus of the State University of +New York +, Syracuse, NY, +USA +, who collected and pre-identified all instars of the new species and kindly sent them to me for description. + + + + +Differential diagnosis. +Adults of + +Eupterotegaeus nortoni + + +sp. nov. + +is morphologically most similar to + +E. ornatissimus +( +Berlese, 1908 +) + +and + +E. steinboecki +( +Mihelčič, 1958 +) + +in the presence of a tooth in the rostral region and the well separated lamellar cusps. However, the new species differ from both in the presence (versus absence) of notogastral setae +c +and interbothridial tubercles, and in the absence (versus presence) of distal toothlike process on the lamellar cusps; also, + +E. ornatissimus + +has no interlamellar tooth (versus tooth present in the new species), and + +E. steinboecki + +is distinctly larger (length: 1030 versus 615–630) and has a small (versus medium-sized in the new species) rostral tooth. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/E9/76/87/E97687DDFFBA901B10FCC095FEB1F8DB.xml b/data/E9/76/87/E97687DDFFBA901B10FCC095FEB1F8DB.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c48637d968c --- /dev/null +++ b/data/E9/76/87/E97687DDFFBA901B10FCC095FEB1F8DB.xml @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + +Ontogenetic instars of the oribatid mite Eupterotegaeus nortoni sp. nov. (Acari, Oribatida, Cepheusidae) from U. S. A. + + + +Author + +Ermilov, Sergey G. + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-07-23 + + +5485 + + +1 + + +49 +61 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.6 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5485.1.6 +1175-5326 +13209609 +F4508429-0996-45AD-B786-03CC547E9065 + + + + + + +Genus + +Eupterotegaeus +Berlese, 1916 + + + + + + + + +Type +species: + +Tegeocranus ornatissimus +Berlese, 1908 + + + + +Generic diagnosis. +Adult +. With character states of +Cepheusidae +(e.g. +Sitnikova 1975 +; S. +Bernini & Bernini 1990 +; +Weigmann 2006 +; +Norton & Behan-Pelletier 2009 +). +Body size +: Medium-sized to large (length about 400–1000). +Integument +: Body and legs covered by thick layer of cerotegument. Notogaster and partially prodorsum often foveolate. +Prodorsum +: Rostrum rounded or truncate. Lamellar cusps long, projecting well beyond rostrum, truncate, anteromedially well separated or connected, with or without medial toothlike process. Translamella present or absent. Prolamella, sublamella and sublamellar porose area absent. Tutorium present, with triangular cusp. Sometimes with rostral and interlamellar teeth. Rostral and lamellar setae short or medium-sized, setiform; interlamellar seta short, setiform or spiniform; bothridial seta usually with slightly or well-developed head; exobothridial seta absent. Interbothridial tubercles present or absent; postbothridial tubercles present; dorsosejugal porose area, dorsophragma and pleurophragma absent. +Notogaster +: Anterior notogastral margin slightly convex medially. Humeral region with short triangular process. Pteromorph and octotaxic system absent. Ten (sometimes fewer—7, 8, 9—if seta +c +or some posterior setae absent) pairs of notogastral setae (centrodorsal part of notogaster without setae) mostly short, setiform, inserted on tubercles. + +Gnathosoma + +. Subcapitulum diarthric. All subcapitular setae setiform. Palp with setation: 0-2-1-3–9(+ω); solenidion bacilliform, coupled with eupathidium mediodistally. Axillary saccule absent. Chelicera chelate-dentate, with two setae. +Epimeral and lateral podosomal regions +: Epimeral setal formula: 3-1-3- 3; epimeral setae comparatively short, setiform. Enantiophysis 4 usually present. Pedotectum I represented by large scale, pedotectum II represented by small scale. Humeral porose area not observed. Circumpedal carina absent. Discidium present. +Anogenital region +: Six pairs of genital, one pair of aggenital, two pairs of anal, and three pairs of adanal setae comparatively short, setiform. Marginal porose area absent. Adanal lyrifissure located close and lateral to anal plate. +Legs +: All legs monodactylous or heterotridactylous. Porose areas present on all femora and on trochanters III, IV. + + + + \ No newline at end of file