diff --git a/data/03/94/48/0394482D45320410FF6BFF20FE3BFB60.xml b/data/03/94/48/0394482D45320410FF6BFF20FE3BFB60.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..26d9b9ca164 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/94/48/0394482D45320410FF6BFF20FE3BFB60.xml @@ -0,0 +1,708 @@ + + + +Stemphylium persianum sp. nov., (Pleosporales, Ascomycota) from Iran + + + +Author + +Ahmadpour, Abdollah + + + +Author + +Ghosta, Youbert +0000-0003-4038-2448 +Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran +y.ghoosta@urmia.ac.ir + + + +Author + +Alavi, Fatemeh + + + +Author + +Alavi, Zahra + + + +Author + +Karunarathna, Samantha C. +0000-0001-7080-0781 +Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biological Resource and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan 655011 P. R. China +samanthakarunarathna@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Tibpromma, Saowaluck +0000-0002-4706-6547 +Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biological Resource and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan 655011 P. R. China +saowaluckfai@gmail.com + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2024 + +2024-05-23 + + +650 + + +1 + + +47 +59 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.650.1.4 + +journal article +301691 +10.11646/phytotaxa.650.1.4 +013d50b0-052e-4f62-b1a0-6f5d26033f79 +1179-3163 +13216219 + + + + + + +Stemphylium persianum + +A. Ahmadpour, Y. Ghosta, Z. Alavi & F. Alavi, + + +sp. nov. + +Figs. 2 +, +3 + + + + + +MycoBank number: MB851921 + + + + + + +Etymology +: + +The name refers to the old name of +Iran +, +Persia +, from which it was collected. + + + + + + +Holotype +:— + +IRAN +18500 +F + + + + +Description: +—Associated with culms of + +Schoenoplectus +sp. + +showing necrotic lesions. +Sexual morph +: +Ascomata +200–360 × 150–300 μm ( +x̄ += 290 × 230 μm, n = 20), solitary, scattered, semi-immersed to immersed, becoming erumpent at maturity, globose to subglobose or oval, dark brown to black, ostiolate. +Ostioles +central, papillate, opening by a pore, filled with hyaline cells. + +Peridium + +25–45 μm wide, composed of two layers, outer layer of heavily pigmented thick-walled cells of +textura angularis +, inner layer composed of light brown to hyaline thick-walled cells of +textura angularis +. +Hamathecium +2–3 μm wide, cellular, septate, branched, dense pseudoparaphyses, and embedded in a gelatinous matrix. +Asci +105–167 × 22–28 μm ( +x̄ += 140 × 25 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical to cylindric-subclavate, straight or curved, with short pedicel and a minute ocular chamber. +Ascospores +24–38 × 13–18 μm ( +x̄ += 31 × 15 μm, n = 50), uni- to bi-seriate, partially overlapping, mostly ellipsoidal, tapering towards the rounded ends, muriform, with 3–6 transverse septa, 3–5 longitudinal septa, and 0–1 oblique septa, constricted at the septa, strongly constricted at the median septum, golden brown or brown, with mucilaginous sheath. +Asexual morph +: Sporulation abundant on PCA, from the erect conidiophores that arise directly from the surface or aerial hyphae. +Hyphae +are pale brown, septate, effuse, branched, 2–5 μm wide. +Conidiophores +45–70 × 4–6 μm ( +x̄ += 55 × 5 μm, n = 20), macronematous, mononematous, simple, solitary, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, erect, septate, smooth-walled, brown, bearing 1–2 thickened, darkened, percurrent rejuvenation sites. +Conidiogenous cells +6–10 × 5–7 μm ( +x̄ += 8 × 6 μm, n = 20), monotretic, integrated or terminal, swollen at apex, pale-brown. +Conidia +(35–)38–55(–60) × (10–)13– 20(–22) μm ( +x̄ += 47 × 17 μm, n = 50), solitary, acrogenous, straight or slightly curved, dark reddish brown, verrucose, oblong-ellipsoid or ovoid with pointed apex, occasionally rounded or subtruncate at the apex, rounded or subtruncate at the base, muriform, with 2–6 transverse septa, 2–6 longitudinal septa, and 1–2 oblique septa, constricted at multiple darkened transverse septa, without mucilaginous sheath. + + +Culture characteristics: +― +Colonies +on PDA reaching +46 mm +diam. after seven days at 25 °C, with sparse white to grey aerial mycelia, olivaceous grey at the center, white at the margin; reverse pale brown. +Colonies +on V-8 +A +reaching +34 mm +diam. after seven days at 25 °C, sparse white aerial mycelia, surface olivaceous grey to pale brown at the margin, white at the center; reverse white, pale brown at the center. +Colonies +on PCA reaching +40 mm +diam. after seven days at 25 °C, smooth margin, surface white to pale olivaceous, floccose aerial mycelia; reverse buff, with pale olivaceous near the center. Ascomata formed on PCA containing culms of host plant after 2‒3 months at 25 ºC. + + + + +Specimens examined: +― + +IRAN +, +Golestan Province +, Bandar-e +Gaz County +, on culm lesions of + + +Schoenoplectus + +sp. + +( + +Cyperaceae + +, + +Poales + +), + +30 September 2022 + +, +A +. +Ahmadpour +, isolate +IRAN 18500 +F +( + +holotype + +, dried culture; +extype +IRAN 4984 +C +) + +; +ibid. +30 September 2022 +, +A +. Ahmadpour, isolate FCCUU 1301. GenBank accession numbers: ITS‒rDNA: PP253963 and PP253964, +gapdh +: PP259104 and PP259105; +cmdA +: PP259106 and PP259107. + + + + +Notes: +—Morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses showed that our isolates belong to + +Stemphylium + +( +Fig. 1 +). Based on multi-gene phylogeny, our isolates formed a well-separated lineage (MLBS/MPBS/BIPP = 100/100/1) and has close affinities with + +S. halophilum + +and + +S. lycii + +( +Fig. 1 +). However, our isolates ( + +S. persianum + +) can be distinguished from + +S. halophilum + +by shorter conidiophores (up to 70 μm +vs. +up to 100 μm), longer conidia (35–60 μm +vs. +26–41 μm), more longitudinal septa in conidia (2–6 +vs. +1–3) and shorter ascospores (24–38 μm +vs. +34–46 μm) ( +Webster 1984 +). + +Stemphylium persianum + +can also be distinguished from + +S. lycii + +based on longer conidia (35–60 μm +vs. +23–31 μm) and more transverse septa in conidia (2–6 +vs. +1–3) ( + +Pei +et al +. 2011 + +). Also, a comparison of nucleotide differences in ITS‒rDNA, +gapdh +and +cmdA +indicates that + +S. persianum + +( +IRAN +4984C) differs from + +S. halophilum + +(CBS 337.73) by 4/491 bp (0.81%) in ITS‒rDNA, 6/540 bp (1.11%) in +gapdh +and 7/609 bp (1.14%) in +cmdA +, and from + +S. lycii + +(CBS 125241) by 5/489 bp (1.02%, with one gap (0 %)) in ITS‒rDNA, 3/540 bp (0.55%) in +gapdh +and 3/609 bp (0.49%) in +cmdA +. + + + +FIGURE 2. +Sexual morph of + +Stemphylium persianum + +(IRAN 4984C). a‒e. Ascomata on PCA medium containing culms of host plant; f. Vertical section through an ascoma; g‒h. +Peridium +; i‒m. Asci; n. Ascospores. Scale bars: d‒e = 100 μm, f‒n = 20 μm. + + + + +FIGURE 3. +Asexual morph of + +Stemphylium persianum + +(IRAN 4984C). a‒b. Symptoms on + +Schoenoplectus +sp. + +; c‒e. Colonies (front and reverse) on PDA (c), PCA (d) and V‒8A (e) culture media after seven days; f. Sporulation pattern on PCA medium; g–j. Conidiophores and conidia; k. Conidia. Scale bars: f‒k = 20 μm. + + + + + +Discussion + + + + +Stemphylium +species + +identification has mostly relied on the variations of morphological characteristics of conidiophores, conidia, and ascospores, and to some extent on host affinity ( +Simmons 1969 +, +1989 +, +2001 +, +2004 +, + +Woudenberg +et al +. 2017 + +, + +Brahmanage +et al +. 2019 + +, + +Marin-Felix +et al +. 2019 + +). However, more than one + +Stemphylium +species + +have been reported from a single plant, + +S. botryosum + +, + +S. truncatulae + +, and + +S. vesicarium + +on alfalfa ( + +Chaisrisook +et al +. 1995 + +, + +Woudenberg +et al +. 2017 + +, + +Marin-Felix +et al +. 2019 + +), + +S. botryosum + +, + +S. gracilariae + +, + +S. lycopersici + +, + +S. eturmiunum + +, + +S. lycii + +, + +S. simmonsii + +, + +S. solani + +, and + +S. vesicarium + +on tomato ( + +Woudenberg +et al +. 2017 + +, + +Marin-Felix +et al +. 2019 + +, + +Bessadat +et al +. 2022 + +), + +S. eturmiunum + +, + +S. vesicarium + +, and + +S. waikerieanum + +on onion ( + +Woudenberg +et al +. 2017 + +, + +Marin-Felix +et al +. 2019 + +), and + +S. lycopersici + +, and + +S. vesicarium + +on asparagus ( + +Woudenberg +et al +. 2017 + +, + +Marin-Felix +et al +. 2019 + +) in different geographical locations. Their higher variability of morphological characteristics in different culture conditions and their overlapping among species has made it difficult to accurately identify species boundaries ( +Leach & Aragaki 1970 +, + +Câmara +et al. +2002 + +, + +Hosen +et al +. 2009 + +, + +Woudenberg +et al +. 2017 + +, + +Brahmanage +et al +. 2019 + +, + +Marin-Felix +et al +. 2019 + +). Molecular tools have been widely used for accurate differentiation among + +Stemphylium +species. + +In a recent revision of + +Stemphylium +species + +, the combination of sequences obtained from ITS‒rDNA, +cmdA +, and +gapdh +genomic regions provided the highest resolution for phylogenetic analyses ( + +Woudenberg +et al +. 2017 + +). + + +In the continuation of our studies, aiming to the isolation and identification of fungal species associated with the plants in the families of +Cyperaceae +and +Juncaceae +in +Iran +( + +Ahmadpour +et al +. 2021 + +), several isolates belonging to + +Stemphylium + +were isolated. Based on morphological and multi-gene phylogenetic analyses, the two isolates represented a new species of + +Stemphylium + +, described herein as + +S. persianum + + +sp. nov +. + +The isolates were obtained from culms of + +Schoenoplectus +sp. + +, a member of the +Cyperaceae +family. Currently, 11 species of + +Stemphylium + +have been reported in +Iran +. However, none of these species have been found on plants in the +Cyperaceae +family ( +Ershad 2009 +, + +Poursafar +et al +. 2016 + +, +2018 +, +Karimzadeh & Fotouhifar 2021 +). It is important to note that most of the identified + +Stemphylium +species + +have only been identified based on their morphological characteristics ( +Ershad 2009 +). To date, + +S. paludiscirpi + +is the only species reported from the plants in the family +Cyperaceae +( + +Scirpus +sp. + +) in the +USA +( +Simmons 2001 +, + +Woudenberg +et al +. 2017 + +, + +Farr +et al +. 2024 + +). + + +Considering the rich diversity of plant species in the family of +Cyperaceae +in the mainland of +Iran +and the higher biodiversity of microfungi associated with these plants, more + +Stemphylium +species + +are expected to be discovered in +Iran +. More studies are needed to elucidate the diversity of neglected + +Stemphylium +species + +associated with these plants in +Iran +and aboard, and assess their pathogenicity and host range. + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/CF/87/03CF87848B71FF983B825863E904EE10.xml b/data/03/CF/87/03CF87848B71FF983B825863E904EE10.xml index bbf78b85f85..1737e6312cf 100644 --- a/data/03/CF/87/03CF87848B71FF983B825863E904EE10.xml +++ b/data/03/CF/87/03CF87848B71FF983B825863E904EE10.xml @@ -1,58 +1,58 @@ - - - -Two new species and a new combination in Pleroma (Melastomataceae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest + + + +Two new species and a new combination in Pleroma (Melastomataceae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest - - -Author + + +Author -Meyer, Fabrício Schmitz -Post-doctoral Researcher, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de pós-graduação em Botânica. +Meyer, Fabrício Schmitz +Post-doctoral Researcher, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de pós-graduação em Botânica. - - -Author + + +Author -Arantes, Fabíula Moreno -Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de pós-graduação em Botânica, Escola Nacional de Botânica Tropical. +Arantes, Fabíula Moreno +Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de pós-graduação em Botânica, Escola Nacional de Botânica Tropical. - - -Author + + +Author -Goldenberg, Renato -Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Botânica, Caixa Postal 19031, CEP 81531 - 970, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. +Goldenberg, Renato +Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Botânica, Caixa Postal 19031, CEP 81531 - 970, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. -text - - -Phytotaxa +text + + +Phytotaxa - -2024 - -2024-03-05 + +2024 + +2024-03-05 - -638 + +638 - -3 + +3 - -209 -226 + +209 +226 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.1 -journal article -10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.1 -1179-3163 -13212982 +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.1 +1179-3163 +13212982 @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ F.S.Mey. & R.Goldenb. - + Type:― BRAZIL . @@ -108,7 +108,9 @@ Estrada holotype : UPCB -!; +!; + + isotypes : RB @@ -232,7 +234,7 @@ long, unbranched, eglandular, erect to curved, the base linear. Capsular fruits , cochleate. - + Paratypes : @@ -242,11 +244,9 @@ long, unbranched, eglandular, erect to curved, the base linear. Capsular fruits . Paraná : -Guaraqueçaba +Guaraqueçaba , -Morro do Quitumbê -ou do -Costão +Morro do Quitumbê ou do Costão , 25°17’S , @@ -257,17 +257,9 @@ ou do (fl.), -S -. -F -. -Athayde -& D. -J -. -S -. -Carrião +S.F. Athayde +& +D.J.S. Carrião 287 ( @@ -279,7 +271,7 @@ ou do !) ; - + ibidem , Rio Guaraqueçaba @@ -289,24 +281,25 @@ ou do (fl.), -R -.X. + +R.X. Lima + 16 ( -EFC +EFC !, -MBM +MBM !, -UPCB +UPCB !) ; - -Guaratuba + +Guaratuba , -Estrada da Limeira +Estrada da Limeira , 25°49’0”S , @@ -317,98 +310,70 @@ ou do , (fl.), -F -. -S -. -Meyer +F.S. Meyer & -A -. -L -. -G -. -Frantz +A.L.G. Frantz 2740 ( -MBM +MBM !, -UPCB +UPCB !) ; - + ibidem , (fl.), -F -. -S -. -Meyer +F.S. Meyer & -A -. -L -. -G -. -Frantz +A.L.G. Frantz 2742 ( RB !, -UPCB +UPCB !) ; - -Morretes + +Morretes , -América de Cima +América de Cima , propriedade às margens da -Ferrovia Curitiba-Paranguá +Ferrovia Curitiba-Paranguá , 25°28’37.7”S -, 48°52’31.2”, +, +48°52’31.2” +, 23 July 2022 (fl., fr.), -F -. -S -. -Meyer +F.S. Meyer & -M -. -L -. -Brotto +M.L. Brotto 2737 ( -MBM +MBM !, RB !, -UPCB +UPCB !) ; - + ibidem , -Zona -rural de -Morretes -, capoeira nas margens do entrocamento entre a -Rua Bocaiúva do Sul -e a PR-408, +Zona rural de Morretes +, +capoeira nas margens do entrocamento entre a Rua Bocaiúva do Sul e a PR-408 +, -25.51787 , -48.80356 @@ -418,29 +383,21 @@ e a PR-408, , (fl.), -F -. -S -. -Meyer +F.S. Meyer & -M -. -L -. -Brotto +M.L. Brotto 2763 ( -MBM +MBM !, RB ! -UPCB +UPCB !) ; - + ibidem , -25.51804 @@ -452,29 +409,21 @@ e a PR-408, , (fl.), -F -. -S -. -Meyer +F.S. Meyer & -M -. -L -. -Brotto +M.L. Brotto 2764 ( -MBM +MBM !, RB !, -UPCB +UPCB !) ; - + ibidem , -25.51770 @@ -486,32 +435,24 @@ e a PR-408, , (fl.), -F -. -S -. -Meyer +F.S. Meyer & -M -. -L -. -Brotto +M.L. Brotto 2765 ( -MBM +MBM !, RB !, -UPCB +UPCB !) ; - -Paranaguá -, EIA -Porto Guará—Laguna + +Paranaguá +, +EIA Porto Guará—Laguna , 25°31’28”S , @@ -522,72 +463,52 @@ e a PR-408, (fl.), -M -. -E -. -Engels +M.E. Engels & -T -. -A -. -Meyer +T.A. Meyer 6778 ( -HCF +HCF , -MBM +MBM !, -UPCB +UPCB !) ; - + ibidem , -Parque Estadual do Palmito +Parque Estadual do Palmito , 26 March 2003 (fl.), -A -. -C -. -Cervi +A.C. Cervi & -A -. -L -. -V -. -Vieira +A.L.V. Vieira 8385 ( -HUCP +HUCP digital image!, -UPCB -!). +UPCB +!). + + Santa Catarina : -Joinville +Joinville , beira de estrada, 26°18’16”S , 48°50’44”W , 2004 (fl.), -C -. -F -. -Wendel +C.F. Wendel s.n. ( @@ -595,7 +516,7 @@ s.n. !) ; - + São Francisco do Sul , Ilha Araújo do Meio @@ -605,60 +526,54 @@ s.n. (fl.), -J -. -Meirelles +J. Meirelles 149 ( -JOI +JOI , -UPCB +UPCB !) ; - + ibidem , -Ilha dos Barcos +Ilha dos Barcos , 29 September 2008 (fl., fr.), -J -. -Meirelles +J. Meirelles 207 ( -JOI +JOI , -UPCB -!). +UPCB +!). + + São Paulo : -Cananéia -, Parque Estadual da Ilha do Cardoso, -Morro do Sambaqui-Mirim +Cananéia +, +Parque Estadual da Ilha do Cardoso +, +Morro do Sambaqui-Mirim , 21 September 1982 , (fl.), -S -. -A -. -C -. -Chiea +S.A.C. Chiea 204 ( -ESA +ESA !, SP , @@ -666,21 +581,15 @@ s.n. ) ; - -Cubatão + +Cubatão , 4 September 1991 (fl.), -S -. -A -. -C -. -Chiea +S.A.C. Chiea 697 ( @@ -688,12 +597,12 @@ s.n. !) ; - -Iguape + +Iguape , -Subaúma -, beira da estrada -Subaúma-Iguape +Subaúma +, +beira da estrada Subaúma-Iguape , 24°48’54.3”S , @@ -704,64 +613,53 @@ s.n. , (fl.), -C -. -D. Sanchez +C.D. Sanchez et al. 22 ( -SPF +SPF !) ; - -Santos + +Santos , -Área da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Santos +Área da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Santos +, +Rua da Servidão da SABESP , -Rua da Servidão -da SABESP, 23 March 2007 (fl.), -R -. -J -. -F -. -Garcia +R.J.F. Garcia 2794 ( -UPCB +UPCB !) ; - + ibidem -, margem da rodovia -Anchieta +, +margem da rodovia Anchieta , s.d. (fl.), -M -. Kuhlmann 4448 +M. Kuhlmann +4448 ( SP -!, -US -) +!, US) ; - -Undetermined -municipality, -Pedro Taques + +Undetermined municipality, +Pedro Taques , Rodovia Cubatão-Mongaguá , @@ -770,9 +668,7 @@ municipality, (fl.), -J -. -Mattos +J. Mattos 11821 ( @@ -780,10 +676,18 @@ municipality, !) ; + ibidem , -J. Mattos 11830 -(SP!). + +J. Mattos +11830 + +( +SP +!) + +. diff --git a/data/03/CF/87/03CF87848B76FF953B8258F9E9A5E040.xml b/data/03/CF/87/03CF87848B76FF953B8258F9E9A5E040.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8d755e3d9b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/CF/87/03CF87848B76FF953B8258F9E9A5E040.xml @@ -0,0 +1,869 @@ + + + +Two new species and a new combination in Pleroma (Melastomataceae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest + + + +Author + +Meyer, Fabrício Schmitz +Post-doctoral Researcher, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de pós-graduação em Botânica. + + + +Author + +Arantes, Fabíula Moreno +Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de pós-graduação em Botânica, Escola Nacional de Botânica Tropical. + + + +Author + +Goldenberg, Renato +Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Botânica, Caixa Postal 19031, CEP 81531 - 970, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2024 + +2024-03-05 + + +638 + + +3 + + +209 +226 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.1 +1179-3163 +13212982 + + + + + + +Pleroma semisterile +F.S.Mey. & R.Goldenb. + + +sp. nov. + +( +Figures 4−5 +). + + + + + + +Type +:― +BRAZIL +. +Espírito Santo +: +Pancas +, +Monumento Natural dos Pontões Capixabas +, +Pedra da Mula +, +19°10’32”S +, +40°47’32”W +, + +13 September 2021 + +, (fl.), + +F.M. Arantes +, +L.F.A. de Paula +& +R. Carvalho +104 + +( +holotype +: +RB +!; + + +isotypes +: +BHCB +!, +HUEFS +, +MBM +!, +MBML +!, +SPF +, +UPCB +!, +VIES +) + +. + + + + +Diagnosis: +— + +Pleroma semisterile + +differs from + +Pleroma fontanae +Meyer, Kollmann & Goldenberg + +(in + +Meyer +et al +. 2018: 242 + +) by the longer petioles, +19–51.3 mm +long ( +vs +. +3.3–12.6 mm +long in + +Pleroma fontanae + +), the antepetalous stamens with pedoconective and appendages covered by glandular trichomes ( +vs +. glabrous), and narrower fruits, +5.5–6 mm +wide ( +vs +. +8.1–8.9 mm +). + + + + +Description: +—Shrubs with sympodial growth, moderately branched, +1–3 m +tall. Younger branches quadrangular, slightly winged, moderately setulose, trichomes +0.7–1.7 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular or glandular (often mixed), curved, the base linear to slightly enlarged, not immersed, not forked; the older branches quadrangular, strongly winged, setulose as the younger branches, frequently decorticating; nodes thickened. Leaves opposite; petioles +19–51.3 mm +long; blades 8.8–15.5 × +5.5–10 cm +, chartaceous, slightly discolorous, ovate, base cordate, apex acute, margins entire, slightly crenulate, 7(–9) acrodromous veins, basal, if 9 veins the submarginal pair tenuous, domatia absent, reticulation conspicuous on the abaxial surface; adaxial surface flat, dark green in dry specimens, green in fresh specimens, with moderately to densely sericeous-setose trichomes +0.8–2.6 mm +long, dendritic, eglandular, curved, the base slightly enlarged to enlarged, not immersed, not forked, without a sequence of white dots, abaxial surface flat, light brown in dry specimens, light green in fresh specimens, moderately villose on the surface, trichomes +0.2–0.7 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, coiled, the base linear, not immersed, not forked, moderately setose on the veins, trichomes +1.5–2.5 mm +long on the central veins, and +0.5–1.3 mm +long on the lateral veins, unbranched, eglandular, curved, the base slightly enlarged, not immersed, not forked. Thyrsoids 27–40.5 × +12.5–19 cm +, terminal, with 30–100 flowers, axis angulose to slightly winged, moderately setulose, +0.3–1.1 mm +long, unbranched, glandular or eglandular (often mixed), curved, the base linear to slightly enlarged, not immersed, not forked; bracts in pairs, the color similar to the leaves, early deciduous, leafy, petioles +3–12.6 mm +long, blades 2.6–4.8 × +1.2–2.4 cm +, ovate to elliptic, base cordate, apex acute, flat, indumentum the same as on the leaves; bracteoles 2, light brown in dry specimens, reddish in fresh specimens, early deciduous, 3.8–6.7 × +1.7–2.7 mm +, lanceolate, base obtuse, apex acute and not covering the apex of the flower bud, slightly concave, adaxial surface glabrous, abaxial surface moderately setulose, the trichomes bigger on the central portion, +0.5–0.8 mm +long, and smaller near the margins, trichomes ca. +0.2 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular, curved, the base linear to slightly enlarged, not immersed, not forked. Flowers 5-merous, ca. +3.5 cm +diam., on pedicels +1.2–2 mm +long; hypanthium 3.4–4.2 × +2.7–3.4 mm +, not costate, green to reddish green in fresh material, brown in dry specimens (adaxial surface), the apex not constricted, moderately setulose, trichomes +0.2–0.9 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, curved, the base slightly enlarged, not immersed, not forked; sepals early deciduous, 3.2–3.9 × +1.7–2.4 mm +, deltoid, flat in fresh material, green to reddish-green in fresh material, brown in dry specimens, margins ciliate, apex acute, adaxial surface glabrous, abaxial surface with the same indumentum as the hypanthium, with longer trichomes concentrated on the central portion of each sepal; petals 1.1–1.6 × +1–1.2 cm +, obovate, apex obcordate to emarginate, purple with a white base (during anthesis) or purple with a red base (in senescent flowers), glabrous in both surfaces, margin ciliate, moderately to sparsely pilose, trichomes ca. +0.2 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular or glandular (often mixed), erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked; stamens 10, strongly dimorphic, the antesepalous sterile, with the filaments white (during anthesis) to reddish (in senescent flowers), +3.8–4.1 mm +long, narrow at the base, moderately pilose in its lower 1/2 or 2/3, trichomes ca. +0.1 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, erect to curved, the base linear to slightly enlarged, pedoconnective white (during anthesis) to reddish (in senescent flowers), +0.6–0.8 mm +prolonged below the thecae, moderately setulose, trichomes ca. +0.1 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, erect to curved, the base linear to slightly enlarged, ventral appendages bilobed, white (during anthesis) and reddish (in senescent flowers), patent, apex obtuse, ca. +0.2 mm +long, indumentum the same as on the pedoconnective, thecae white (during anthesis) to light brown (in senescent flowers), 2.5–2.8 × ca. +0.1 mm +, filiform, very narrow, always lacking pollen grains, the antepetalous fertile, with filaments white (during anthesis) to reddish (in senescent flowers), +3.3–3.7 mm +long, thickened at the base, moderately pilose in its lower 1/2, trichomes ca. +0.1 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, erect to curved, the base linear to slightly enlarged, pedoconnective white (during anthesis) to reddish (in senescent flowers), +0.6–0.8 mm +long, prolonged below the thecae, sparsely setulose, trichomes ca. +0.2 mm +long, unbranched, glandular, erect to curved, the base linear to slightly enlarged, ventral appendages bilobed white (during anthesis) and reddish (in senescent flowers), patent, apex obtuse, ca. +0.2 mm +long, indumentum the same as on the pedoconnective, thecae white (during anthesis) to light brown (in senescent flowers), 3–3.4 × ca. +0.1 mm +, widely and shortly falcate, thickened, filled with abundant pollen grains; ovary 3.6–3.8 × +2.8–3 mm +, 5-locular, apex densely sericeous, trichomes +0.5–1 mm +long, unbranched, eglandular or glandular (often mixed), erect, the base linear, not immersed, not forked; style whitish (during anthesis) to reddish (in senescent flowers), 5.2–5.8–mm long, apex curved, moderately setulose in its lower 2/3, trichomes ca. +0.3 mm +long, eglandular (seldom mixed with glandular ones), curved, the base linear to slightly enlarged. Capsular fruits 6.5–7.7 × +5.5–6 mm +, globose, sepals lacking, epicarp undivided when mature, costate. Seeds ca. 0.7 × +0.4 mm +, cochleate. + + + + +Paratypes +: + +— +BRAZIL +. +Espírito Santo +: +Pancas +, +Monumento Natural dos Pontões Capixabas +, +Paredão das Ruschianas +, +Vale Paranazinho +, +19°09’52”S +, +40°49’7”W +, + +20 January 2022 + +, (fl., fr.), + +F.M. Arantes +& +G.M. Marcusso +267 + +( +RB +!, +UPCB +!) + +; + +ibidem +, +Pedra do Operário +, +19°13’5”S +, +40°50’35”W +, + +27 March 2022 + +(fr.), + +F.M. Arantes +et al. 353 + +( +RB +!) + +; + +ibidem +, +Pedra do Vidal +, +19°11’19”S +, +40°47’0”W +, + +22 November 2021 + +(fl.), + +F.M. Arantes +et al. 217 + +( +RB +!) + +; + +ibidem +, (fr.), + +F.M. Arantes +et al. 221 + +( +RB +!) + +; + +ibidem +, +Sítio do Max +, +Paredão Figueiras +, +19°10’54”S +, +40°49’47”W +, + +31 May 2022 + +(fr.), + +F.M. Arantes +& +M.M.G. Resende +408 + +( +RB +!) + +. + + +Distribuition and habitat +:— + +Pleroma semisterile + +occurs in scrubs associated with granitic inselbergs amidst a matrix of semideciduous seasonal forest ("floresta estacional semidecidual" according to the classification by +IBGE 2012 +), and montane atlantic rain forest ("floresta ombrófila densa"), being known exclusively from the "Monumento Natural dos Pontões Capixabas" (MNPC; +Figure 6 +). + + + +FIGURE 4. +Photos of living specimens of + +Pleroma semisterile + +. A. Habitat and live specimens with flowering branches. B. Leaves, adaxial surface. C. Angulose to slightly winged inflorescence axis. D. Inflorescence. E. Flower in lateral view. F. Detail of the androecium and gynoecium. G. The place of occurrence of the species, in vegetation associated with granitic inselbergs at Monumento Natural dos Pontões Capixabas. [All Photos by Fabíula Moreno Arantes]. + + + + +FIGURE 5 +. Plate with photos from herbarium specimens of + +Pleroma semisterile + +based on the holotype and isotypes. A. Branch. B. Detail of the winged branch. C. Detail of the indumentum on the adaxial surface of the leaf. D. Detail of the indumentum on the abaxial surface of the leaf. E. Bracteole (abaxial surface). F. Floral bud. G. Antesepalous, sterile stamen. H. Antepetalous, fertile stamen. I. Gynoecium. J. Mature fruit. [A-J: +Arantes et al. 104 +]. + + + +Phenology +:—Collected with flowers between September and November, and in January. Collected with fruits from November to May. + + +Conservation status +:—The species is known from only +six specimens +, collected in the municipality of Pancas, state of +Espírito Santo +, from which five were inside the MNPC, a full protection unit ( +Figure 6 +). Its Extent of Occurrence (EOO) is about +16.987 km +2 +and its Area of Occupancy (AOO) is about 20.000 Km +2 +. These values support a Critically Endangered [CR: B1a] conservation status according to criterion B of +IUCN (2022) +. An aggravating factor for its conservation is that its populations are known from only a single location. + + + + +FIGURE 6. +Distribution map of + +Pleroma semisterile + +. Abbreviations: MG: Minas Gerais; ES: Espírito Santo. + + + + +Etymology +:—The epithet + +“ +semisterile + +” refers to the pollen-empty anthers in the antesepalous stamen whorl, contrasting with the fully fertile, pollen-filled anthers in the antepetalous whorl. These five sterile plus five fertile anthers make the androecium half-sterile and give the name to this species. + + +Notes +:—The most noteworthy character in this species, and which dragged our attention to it, is the half-sterile androecium mentioned right above. In order to confirm that, we checked antesepalous and antepetalous anthers from two flower buds, both removed from the +holotype +. We macerated these anthers on histological slides, stained them with acetocarmine ( +Martin 1959 +, +Goldenberg & Shepherd 1998 +), and observed them under an optical microscope. We found no pollen at all in the antesepalous anthers, while there was a very abundant load in the antepetalous anthers. This means that the antesepalous stamens are staminoidal, despite being perfectly formed, with distinct filaments, connectives (and respective glandular trichomes), and anthers. Flowers with only one fertile stamen whorl are diagnostic for few genera in Neotropical +Melastomataceae +such as + +Allomaieta +( +Gleason 1929: 98 +) + +, + +Alloneuron +( +Pilger 1905: 185 +) + +, + +Quipuanthus +Michelangeli & Ulloa + +(in + +Michelangeli +et al. +2014: 533 + +), + +Wurdastom +Wallnöfer (1996: 461 + +; all in tribe +Cyphostyleae +, see + +Michelangeli +et al +. 2022 + +), + +Rhynchanthera +De Candolle (1828: 106 + +; see +Renner 1990 +) and + +Brasilianthus +Almeda & Michelangeli + +(in + +Almeda +et al +. 2016: 272 + +) and present in a few species of + +Blakea +Browne (1756: 323) + +, + +Cambessedesia +De Candolle (1828: 110) + +, + +Miconia +Ruiz & Pavón (1794: 60) + +, + +Microlicia +D. +Don (1823: 301) + +, + +Monochaetum +De Candolle (1828: 135) + +, + +Poteranthera +Bongard (1838: 137) + +, and + +Siphanthera +Pohl 1827: 102 + +; see + +Judd +et al +. 2022 + +). The only species with a single fertile stamen whorl recorded in the tribe +Melastomateae +are two + +Pterolepis +( +De Candolle 1828: 40 +) +Miquel (1840: 72 + +; see +Almeda & Martins 2015 +, + +Goldenberg +et al +. 2023 + +) and, at least to our knowledge, this has not been reported to + +Pleroma + +before. Being this rare, this character seems to have evolved multiple times in the family, but with two points in common among all these taxa: the sterile or absent anthers usually belong to the antepetalous whorl, and the sterile stamens are always shorter than the fertile ones; sterile stamens longer than the fertile, and also the sterile ones as part of the antesepalous whorl, such as the ones found in + +P. semisterile + +, are unknown to us (RG and +FSM +, pers. obs.). Finally, when comparing the samples from this new species with other similar species (see discussion below), we were surprised by the fact that + +P. fontanae + +and + +P. magdalenense + +share with it the same very narrow anthers in the antesepalous stamens. We were not able to check whether the anthers in these species really lack pollen, as they do in + +P. semisterile + +, but it seems that this particular type of haplostemony with sterile antesepalous stamens may occur in other species in this group. + + + +Pleroma semisterile + +is morphologically related to + +P. fontanae + +due to the shrubby habit, branches with conspicuous wings and thick nodes, ovate leaves with a cordate base, 7–9 acrodromous veins, and the adaxial surface sericeous and covered with dendritic trichomes. They also share the elliptic or lanceolate bracteoles, 5-merous, small flowers ca. +2.5–4 cm +diam., a setulose hypanthium covered by glandular trichomes, purple petals with a white base during anthesis, filaments and style covered by glandular trichomes, and a short style ( +4.6–5.5 mm +long in + +P. fontanae + +, and +5.2–5.8 mm +long in + +P. semisterile + +). The androecium in both is also similar, with filiform, very narrow thecae in the antesepalous stamens and strongly thickened thecae in the antepetalous ones. + +Pleroma semisterile + +differs from + +P. fontanae + +by the characteristics pointed out on the diagnosis, and also by the leaves with a dark green adaxial surface in dry specimens ( +vs +. silvery in + +P. fontanae + +), and longer inflorescences, +27–40.5 cm +long ( +vs +. +9–19.5 cm +in + +P. fontanae + +). Both share similar habitats in granitic and gneissic inselbergs in the state of +Espírito Santo +, but + +Pleroma semisterile + +occurs to the north of Rio Doce, while + +P. fontanae + +occurs only to the south of it, in the municipalities of São Roque do Canaã and Itaguaçu. + + + +Pleroma semisterile + +is morphologically related to + +Pleroma magdalenense + +(see this new combination below) due to the shrubby habit, leaves with very long petioles ( +16.8–41.2 mm +long in + +P. magdalenense + +, and +19–51.3 mm +long in + +P. semisterile + +), the blades ovate, with a cordate base, and very long thyrsoids ( +19.5–35.5 cm +long in + +P. magdalenense + +, and +27–40.5 cm +long in + +P. semisterile + +). Both also share the flower buds surrounded by two bracteoles, 5-merous, small flowers, +2.5–4 cm +diam., purple petals, filaments and style covered by glandular trichomes, and costate fruits. The androecium in both is also similar, with filiform, very narrow thecae in the antesepalous stamens and strongly thickened thecae in the antepetalous ones. + +Pleroma semisterile + +differs from + +P. magdalenense + +by the older branches strongly winged ( +vs +. not winged in + +P. magdalenense + +), adaxial surface of the leaves covered with dendritic trichomes ( +vs +. unbranched trichomes), the antesepalous stamens with pedoconective and appendages covered with glandular trichomes ( +vs +. glabrous), and globose wider fruits, +5.5–6 mm +wide ( +vs +. oblong, ca. +4 mm +wide). Both species occur on granitic and gneissic inselbergs, but + +Pleroma magdalenense + +occurs only in the state of +Rio de Janeiro +, in Parque Estadual do Desengano, further south than + +P. semisterile +. + + + + +Pleroma semisterile + +is also morphologically related to + +Pleroma manicatum +( +Cogniaux 1891: 220 +) Guimarães & Michelangeli + +(in + +Guimarães +et al +. 2019: 984 + +) due to the shrubby habit, the branches with thick nodes, leaves with very long petioles ( +14.9–32.4 mm +long in + +P. manicatum + +), the blades ovate, with a cordate base, and very long thyrsoids ( +15.5–33.7 cm +long in + +P. manicatum + +). Both also share the flower buds surrounded by two lanceolate bracteoles, the hypanthium setulose with glandular trichomes, 5-merous, small flowers +2.5–4 cm +diam., purple petals, filaments and style covered by glandular trichomes, and costate fruits. The androecium in both is also similar, with filiform, very narrow thecae in the antesepalous stamens and strongly thickened thecae in the antepetalous ones. + +Pleroma semisterile + +differs from + +P. manicatum + +by the older branches strongly winged ( +vs +. not winged to angulose in + +P. manicatum + +), adaxial surface of the leaves covered with dendritic trichomes ( +vs +. unbranched trichomes), shorter sepals, +3.2–3.9 mm +long ( +vs. +6–8 mm +long), and the antesepalous stamens with pedoconective and appendages covered with glandular trichomes ( +vs +. glabrous). Both species are rupicolous and occur on granitic and gneissic inselbergs, but + +Pleroma manicatum + +occurs only in the state of +Minas Gerais +, in the Parque Nacional do Caparaó, further south than + +P. semisterile +. + + + +Finally, + +P. semisterile + +shares some morphological features with + +Pleroma kollmannianum +Meyer & Goldenberg + +(in + +Meyer +et al +. 2016: 202 + +)—shrubby habit, branches with conspicuous wings and thick nodes, ovate leaves with a cordate base, 7–9 acrodromous veins, and sericeous adaxial surface (sericeous-setose in + +P. semisterile + +). They also share the long inflorescences (65–80 × +28–32 cm +in + +P. kollmannianum + +, and 27–40.5 × +12.5–19 cm +in + +P. semisterile + +), 5-merous flowers, purple petals with a white base during anthesis, filaments of the stamens (antepetalous and antesepalous) covered by glandular trichomes, and short style ( +4.4–4.8 mm +long in + +P. kollmannianum + +, and +5.2–5.8 mm +long in + +P. semisterile + +). + +Pleroma semisterile + +differs from + +P. kollmannianum + +by the elongated petioles +19–51.3 mm +long ( +vs +. +1.7– 2.5 mm +long in + +P. kollmannianum + +), the adaxial surface of the leaves covered by dendritic trichomes ( +vs +. unbranched trichomes), and the hypanthium setulose, with glandular trichomes ( +vs. +sericeous, with eglandular trichomes). Both occur in granitic and gneissic inselbergs in the state of +Espírito Santo +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/CF/87/03CF87848B7CFF903B825E9AEBB9EAF8.xml b/data/03/CF/87/03CF87848B7CFF903B825E9AEBB9EAF8.xml index 269a8df4049..30b9d8d4545 100644 --- a/data/03/CF/87/03CF87848B7CFF903B825E9AEBB9EAF8.xml +++ b/data/03/CF/87/03CF87848B7CFF903B825E9AEBB9EAF8.xml @@ -1,58 +1,58 @@ - - - -Two new species and a new combination in Pleroma (Melastomataceae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest + + + +Two new species and a new combination in Pleroma (Melastomataceae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest - - -Author + + +Author -Meyer, Fabrício Schmitz -Post-doctoral Researcher, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de pós-graduação em Botânica. +Meyer, Fabrício Schmitz +Post-doctoral Researcher, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de pós-graduação em Botânica. - - -Author + + +Author -Arantes, Fabíula Moreno -Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de pós-graduação em Botânica, Escola Nacional de Botânica Tropical. +Arantes, Fabíula Moreno +Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de pós-graduação em Botânica, Escola Nacional de Botânica Tropical. - - -Author + + +Author -Goldenberg, Renato -Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Botânica, Caixa Postal 19031, CEP 81531 - 970, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. +Goldenberg, Renato +Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Botânica, Caixa Postal 19031, CEP 81531 - 970, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. -text - - -Phytotaxa +text + + +Phytotaxa - -2024 - -2024-03-05 + +2024 + +2024-03-05 - -638 + +638 - -3 + +3 - -209 -226 + +209 +226 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.1 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.1 -journal article -10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.1 -1179-3163 -13212982 +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.638.3.1 +1179-3163 +13212982 @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Basionym:— - + Type :― BRAZIL @@ -122,7 +122,9 @@ Basionym:— holotype : RB 00662326 -digital image!; +digital image!; + + isotypes : RB 00541566 diff --git a/data/03/ED/87/03ED87CD8D53FF8DFD9FDF32D559FCC6.xml b/data/03/ED/87/03ED87CD8D53FF8DFD9FDF32D559FCC6.xml index 4b0206f925c..cf870920ef7 100644 --- a/data/03/ED/87/03ED87CD8D53FF8DFD9FDF32D559FCC6.xml +++ b/data/03/ED/87/03ED87CD8D53FF8DFD9FDF32D559FCC6.xml @@ -1,55 +1,56 @@ - - - -First record of the genus Lissocnemis Kohl, 1907 (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pompilidae: Ctenocerinae) from Korea, with a new species and an unrecorded species + + + +First record of the genus Lissocnemis Kohl, 1907 (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pompilidae: Ctenocerinae) from Korea, with a new species and an unrecorded species - - -Author + + +Author -Kim, Jeong-Kyu +Kim, Jeong-Kyu - - -Author + + +Author -Shimizu, Akira -aquilashimizu7@gmail.com +Shimizu, Akira +aquilashimizu7@gmail.com - - -Author + + +Author -Pitts, James P. -Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84322 - 5305 USA. -james.pitts@usu.edu +Pitts, James P. +Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84322 - 5305 USA. +james.pitts@usu.edu -text - - -European Journal of Taxonomy +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy - -2024 - -2024-08-23 + +2024 + +2024-08-23 - -947 + +947 - -248 -267 + +248 +267 - -https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2633/12117 + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2633/12117 -journal article -10.5852/ejt.2024.947.2633 -2118-9773 -D404A79E-E10C-4B42-817B-8A6A635A32AA +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2024.947.2633 +2118-9773 +13365918 +D404A79E-E10C-4B42-817B-8A6A635A32AA @@ -71,7 +72,7 @@ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: -Figs 1–3 +Figs 1–3 @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ but whitish in L. koreana ( -Fig. 3B +Fig. 3B ), but such pubescence is lacking or at most sparse in L. nigra @@ -120,7 +121,7 @@ than in L. koreana . The female and male have the hind tibia with a longitudinal groove along the upper margin of the inner brush. The male is unique in having a pair of short, oblique, linear tubercles on S4 subbasally ( -Fig. 1K +Fig. 1K , red arrows). @@ -509,9 +510,9 @@ are given in parentheses) COLOURATION . Body and appendages mostly black ( -Fig. 1A +Fig. 1A ). Antenna greyish beneath. T1 below lateral crease, T2 laterally and S1–2 translucent dark reddish brown ( -Fig. 1A, J +Fig. 1A, J ), T7 creamy. Fore tibial spur yellowish brown basally, dark brown apically; mid and hind tibial spurs dark brown. Apical half of mandible dark rufous. Wings translucent with brownish tint, iridescent depending on incident lighting angle. @@ -524,32 +525,32 @@ are given in parentheses) INTEGUMENTAL SCULPTURE . Upper frons ( -Fig. 1C–D +Fig. 1C–D ), clypeus, pro-, meso- and metanota ( -Fig. 1G–H +Fig. 1G–H ), mesopleuron, and lower metapleuron with dense punctures, these on upper frons larger than those on other parts. Metapostnotum with a few transverse striae anteriorly, several oblique striae laterally, and shallow smooth depression posteromedially ( -Fig. 1H +Fig. 1H ). Upper metapleuron with fine, oblique striae and small punctures between them. Propodeum strongly punctate-rugulose medially and punctate-reticulate laterally. Metasomal terga with minute setiferous pores. HEAD . 1.1–1.2 (1.2) × as broad as high. MID 0.54–0.58 (0.54) × TFD. Vertex strongly convex above level of eye tops, chevron-shaped in frontal view ( -Fig. 1C +Fig. 1C ). Frontal sulcus forming slit-like smooth line only on lower half of frons, sometimes shallowly impressed line on upper half of frons. Antennocular line inclined, supra-antennal tubercle, in dorsal view, broad trapezoid ( -Fig. 1D +Fig. 1D ). Inner orbits weakly sinuous, slightly emarginate above middle, closest to each other across middle of antennal sockets, slightly divergent above and convergent below. LID 0.92–0.97 (0.97) × UID. POD:OOD:OOcD 0=1:1.1– 1.2 (1.2):1.3–1.8 (1.7). Ocellar triangle right-angled ( -Fig. 1D +Fig. 1D ); anterior ocellus larger than posterior ocelli. Areas anterior to and lateral to anterior ocellus and areas lateral to posterior ocelli smooth and shallowly depressed ( -Fig. 1D +Fig. 1D ). Clypeus transverse, 2.4–2.6 (2.5) × as broad as long, slightly convex medially with narrow apical rim not distinctly depressed but smooth; apical margin very slightly emarginate medially. Antenna stout ( -Fig. 2B +Fig. 2B ); scape scarcely curved outward, triangularly produced apicomesially ( -Fig. 1D +Fig. 1D ); scape:pedicel:Fl1:Fl2 =1.4–1.7 (1.5):0.46–0.53 (0.47):1:1.1–1.2 (1.1); Fl1 1.3–1.5 (1.5) × as long as broad; Fl11 2.7 × as long as broad, 1.3–1.4 (1.3) × as long as Fl10. Gena, in dorsal view, rather strongly receding posteriorly ( -Fig. 1D +Fig. 1D ) but not thin, in profile, 0.41–0.48 (0.44) × as broad as eye medially, slightly narrower below than above. - + Fig. 2. @@ -572,7 +573,7 @@ Kim & Shimizu . T7 and genitalia, dorsal view. Scale bars=1 mm. - + Fig. 3. @@ -608,19 +609,19 @@ Kim & Shimizu MESOSOMA . Pronotum with declivity flattened, smooth, and almost vertical ( -Fig. 1A +Fig. 1A ); dorsum, in dorsal view, distinctly narrowing cephalad, truncate anteriorly; posterior margin gently arcuate as a whole but angulate at middle ( -Fig. 1G +Fig. 1G ). Scutellum and metanotum distinctly convex ( -Fig. 1A +Fig. 1A ); metanotum depressed laterally to disc, truncate posteromedially. Metapostnotum 0.51–0.60 (0.55) × as long as metanotum at midline, its posterior margin weakly constricted both medially and in front of spiracle, with very small, smooth, triangular depression posteromedially ( -Fig. 1H +Fig. 1H ). Propodeal dorsum nearly parallel-sided, gently convex, gradually merging into declivity. WINGS ( -Fig. 1F +Fig. 1F ). FW discal cell 1 with faint hyaline spot subbasally; pterostigma and veins dark brown. Pterostigma 4.0–4.3 (4.2) × as long as high. Marginal cell distanced from wing tip by 0.42–0.48 (0.44) × its own length. 2 r-rs short, 0.62–0.69 (0.63) × as long as height of pterostigma. SMC2:SMC3= 1:0.64– 0.88 (0.65) on vein @@ -656,15 +657,15 @@ originating slightly posteriorly to separation of vein LEGS . Mid tibia with several short spines dorsally. Hind tibia with spines dorsally, these being weaker and sparser than those on mid tibia. Longer spur of hind tibia 0.71–0.77 (0.73) × hind tarsomere 1. Hind tibial brush very narrow (nearly half of AOD) and linear throughout, its upper groove deeply impressed. Hind tarsomeres slightly compressed laterally, narrowing apically. Fore and mid tarsal claws bifid; hind tarsal claw edentate ( -Fig. 1E +Fig. 1E ), acutely bent subapically, pointed at apex, a pair of claws closely set, parallel to each other or slightly divergent. METASOMA . Fusiform ( -Fig. 1I +Fig. 1I ), narrower than mesosoma, its width ca 0.9 × as wide as mesosoma measured between posterior ends of mesoscutum. T1 gradually narrowing anteriorly but not petiolate; lateral crease finely impressed on basal 0.65–0.80 (0.70) of T1, slightly curved ( -Fig. 1J +Fig. 1J ). @@ -673,19 +674,19 @@ originating slightly posteriorly to separation of vein AND GENITALIA ( -Fig. 2 +Fig. 2 ). Subgenital plate transversely convex with short setae on entire surface and longer setae on apicolateral and apical margins ( -Fig. 2A +Fig. 2A ); lateral margins subparallel in basal half and gently narrowed toward apex, apicolateral corners rounded, almost truncate apically. Paramere short ( -Figs 2B–D +Figs 2B–D ), not exceeding beyond apex of digitus volsellaris, wedge-shaped apically, setose except basally; digitus volsellaris club-shaped ( -Fig. 2C +Fig. 2C ) but triangularly subacute apically ( -Fig. 2B +Fig. 2B ), scattered with micropores, extending beyond apex of aedeagus; parapenial lobe nearly parallel-sided ( -Fig. 2D +Fig. 2D ), broad and rounded apically, not extending beyond apex of aedeagus; aedeagus, in dorsal view, nearly parallel-sided ( -Fig. 2D +Fig. 2D ), slightly convex in middle. @@ -700,9 +701,9 @@ originating slightly posteriorly to separation of vein COLOURATION . Body and legs mostly black ( -Fig. 3A +Fig. 3A ). Ventral faces of Fl3–10 reddish brown ( -Fig. 3B +Fig. 3B ). Inner side of hind tibia except apically, tarsomere 5, and all tarsal claws reddish brown; outer side of hind tibia dark rufous; tibial spurs dark brown. FW clouded with brown, iridescent on incident lighting angle; pterostigma and veins dark brown; discoidal cell 1 with ill-defined clear spot subbasally. HW transparent with brownish tint. @@ -710,27 +711,27 @@ originating slightly posteriorly to separation of vein AND SETAE . Body and appendages with short, dense, appressed pubescence, these being mostly coppery ( -Fig. 3C–D, F, I +Fig. 3C–D, F, I ), silvery white on clypeus apicolaterally ( -Fig. 3D +Fig. 3D ), scape mesially ( -Fig. 3B +Fig. 3B ), pedicel, Fl1–2, basal half of Fl3 anteriorly, mandible basally, propleuron ( -Fig. 3F +Fig. 3F ), lower mesopleuron except anterodorsally and posterodorsally, mesosternum, lower metapleuron posteroventrally, propodeum anteromedially and posterolaterally ( -Fig. 3H +Fig. 3H ), coxae ( -Fig. 3F +Fig. 3F ), trochanters, femora except dorsally, tibiae laterally, T1–4 apically (forming narrow apical bands with mesial interruptions; -Fig. 3I +Fig. 3I ), T5 medially ( -Fig. 3I +Fig. 3I ), T6 dorsally ( -Fig. 3K +Fig. 3K ), S1, S2–3 anteriorly, medially and posteriorly ( -Fig. 3J +Fig. 3J ), and S4–5 medially. Setae on body mostly short and scarce; vertex, clypeus apically, labrum, mandible, pronotum, T6 laterally, and metasomal sterna with fine, pale brown setae, these on labrum, mandible, T6, and S6 being comparatively long; propleuron, meso- and metapleura ventrally, propodeum laterally ( -Fig. 3H +Fig. 3H ), coxae, trochanters, and femora ventrally with short, sparse, erect, silvery white setae. @@ -741,39 +742,39 @@ originating slightly posteriorly to separation of vein HEAD . 1.2× as broad as high in frontal view ( -Fig. 3D +Fig. 3D ); MID 0.55 × TFD. Vertex moderately convex above level of eye tops.Antennocular line strongly convex between eyes ( -Fig. 3C +Fig. 3C ). Lower half of frons protruded anteriorly ( -Fig. 3F +Fig. 3F ); frontal sulcus distinct, forming smooth line in its lower half, feebly impressed and more broadened in its upper part ( -Fig. 3D +Fig. 3D ). Inner orbits slightly emarginate above middle, slightly divergent below ( -Fig. 3D +Fig. 3D ). LID 1.2–1.3 × UID. Lower frons immediately lateral to antennal socket with linear furrow, that being deeper and broader than frontal sulcus. Ocellar triangle right-angled, slightly raised; anterior ocellus larger than posterior ocelli; POD:OOD:OOcD=1:0.78–0.94:1.7–2.1. Clypeus transverse, slightly broader than LID, 2.6–2.9 × as broad as long, convex medially; apical rim broader medially than laterally, very slightly depressed, subpolished with fine transverse striae; apicolateral corner broadly rounded; apical margin barely convex medially. Labrum gently and arcuately convex apically. Scape barely curved outward ( -Fig. 3B +Fig. 3B ); scape:pedicel:Fl1:Fl2= 0.73–0.89:0.20–0.25:1:1.1; Fl1 3.7 × as long as broad, almost as long as UID; Fl11 3.8–3.9 × as long as broad, 1.3–1.4 × as long as Fl10. Gena, in dorsal view, rather strongly receding posteriorly, thinner than in male ( -Fig. 3C +Fig. 3C ), in profile, 0.27–0.30 × as broad as eye medially, broader below than above ( -Fig. 3F +Fig. 3F ). MESOSOMA . Pronotal dorsum declivous, truncate anteriorly; declivity almost vertical ( -Fig. 3F +Fig. 3F ); lateral margins barely convex posteriorly, gradually converging anteriorly ( -Fig. 3G +Fig. 3G ); posterior margin deeply arcuate, very weakly subangulate at middle ( -Fig. 3G +Fig. 3G ). Mesoscutum raised posterolaterally with parapsidal sulci divergent anteriorly, deeply impressed posteriorly ( -Fig. 3G +Fig. 3G ). Disc of scutellum slightly raised above level of mesoscutum. Metanotum lateral to disc depressed, steeply declined posteromedially. Metapostnotum 0.24–0.27 × as long as metanotum at midline ( -Fig. 3H +Fig. 3H ). Propodeum with lateral margins slightly arcuate ( -Fig. 3H +Fig. 3H ); dorsum transversely convex, not delimited from declivity ( -Fig. 3F, H +Fig. 3F, H ); declivity rather flattened. @@ -819,13 +820,13 @@ originating slightly anteriorly to or at separation of vein LEGS . Fore tarsomere 1 longer than fore tarsomeres 2–4 combined. Mid and hind tibiae with several short spines laterally and dorsally; apical spines of hind tibia few and short, not splayed out. Longer spur of hind tibia 0.59–0.63 × as long as hind tarsomere 1. Tarsal claws bifid ( -Fig. 3E +Fig. 3E ). METASOMA . Its width at posterior ends of T2 1.2 × as broad as mesosoma at posterior ends of pronotum. T1 very shortly petiolate ( -Fig. 3G +Fig. 3G ). diff --git a/data/03/ED/87/03ED87CD8D58FF90FD85DDACD57CFECD.xml b/data/03/ED/87/03ED87CD8D58FF90FD85DDACD57CFECD.xml index 7f6d325f0e5..98951fd0eb1 100644 --- a/data/03/ED/87/03ED87CD8D58FF90FD85DDACD57CFECD.xml +++ b/data/03/ED/87/03ED87CD8D58FF90FD85DDACD57CFECD.xml @@ -1,55 +1,56 @@ - - - -First record of the genus Lissocnemis Kohl, 1907 (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pompilidae: Ctenocerinae) from Korea, with a new species and an unrecorded species + + + +First record of the genus Lissocnemis Kohl, 1907 (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pompilidae: Ctenocerinae) from Korea, with a new species and an unrecorded species - - -Author + + +Author -Kim, Jeong-Kyu +Kim, Jeong-Kyu - - -Author + + +Author -Shimizu, Akira -aquilashimizu7@gmail.com +Shimizu, Akira +aquilashimizu7@gmail.com - - -Author + + +Author -Pitts, James P. -Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84322 - 5305 USA. -james.pitts@usu.edu +Pitts, James P. +Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84322 - 5305 USA. +james.pitts@usu.edu -text - - -European Journal of Taxonomy +text + + +European Journal of Taxonomy - -2024 - -2024-08-23 + +2024 + +2024-08-23 - -947 + +947 - -248 -267 + +248 +267 - -https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2633/12117 + +https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/2633/12117 -journal article -10.5852/ejt.2024.947.2633 -2118-9773 -D404A79E-E10C-4B42-817B-8A6A635A32AA +journal article +10.5852/ejt.2024.947.2633 +2118-9773 +13365918 +D404A79E-E10C-4B42-817B-8A6A635A32AA @@ -66,7 +67,7 @@ -Figs 4–5 +Figs 4–5 @@ -125,15 +126,15 @@ Prefectures [NMNS]. This species is distinctive in having the following features: female body largely black, anterior face of head and a few apical metasomal segments with golden pubescence ( -Fig. 4A–B +Fig. 4A–B ); antenna except apically, legs, and a few apical metasomal segments reddish brown; wings dark brown with an oval clear spot in FW discal cell 1 basally ( -Fig. 4A +Fig. 4A ); male body largely black and covered with conspicuous long white pubescence; all legs mostly reddish brown ( -Fig. 4H +Fig. 4H ); upper frons with a pair of oblique or arcuate ridge lines ( -Fig. 4E +Fig. 4E ); and subgenital plate with a pair of deep oval depressions subbasally ( -Fig. 5A +Fig. 5A ). @@ -269,7 +270,7 @@ leg.; . - + Fig. 4. @@ -322,9 +323,9 @@ leg.; COLOURATION . Body largely black. Following orange ( -Fig. 4A–B +Fig. 4A–B ): interantennal tubercle, clypeus apically (apical rim dark rufous), labrum, mandible (black basally, dark rufous apically), labiomaxillary complex apically and its palpi, antenna (becoming darker or black apically), all legs (tarsomere 5 darkened), and metasomal segments 4 (apically) to 6. FW deeply infuscate ( -Fig. 4A +Fig. 4A ). HW weakly infuscate, basal half of basal cell and subbasal cell translucent. @@ -337,27 +338,27 @@ leg.; INTEGUMENTAL SCULPTURE . Head and thorax with minute dense punctures, these on head being mostly covered with pubescence. In addition to these punctures, larger punctures scattered on thorax dorsally and laterally. Metanotum with a few oblique striae laterally. Metapostnotum with a few transverse striae and median deep depression. Propodeum with transverse rugulae, these becoming coarser and stronger posteriorly ( -Fig. 4C +Fig. 4C ); dorsum with median ridge line interrupted by transverse rugulae; declivity with median vague groove. HEAD . 1.2 × as broad as high. Vertex moderately convex above level of eye tops. Frontal sulcus deeply impressed below, evanescent above. Inner orbits slightly emarginate above middle ( -Fig. 4B +Fig. 4B ), slightly divergent below, LID 1.1–1.2 × UID. Antennocular line moderately inclined. Supra-antennal tubercle, in dorsal view, strongly produced anteriorly, pentagon-shaped. POD:OOD:OOcD=1:1–1.1:1.6–2.2. Ocellar triangle acute-angled; anterior ocellus larger than posterior ocelli; area anterior to anterior ocellus and that posterolateral to posterior ocellus more or less depressed. Clypeus transverse, 2.3–2.4 × as broad as long, slightly broader than LID, slightly convex; apical rim not depressed, narrowly impunctate and polished; apicolateral corner broadly rounded; apical margin barely concave medially. Labrum well exposed, gently convex apically. Malar space very short and linear. Gena, in dorsal view, rather strongly receding posteriorly but not very thin, in profile, 0.22–0.27 × as broad as eye medially, broader below than above. Scape slightly curved outward; scape:pedicel:Fl1:Fl2=1.0–1.1:0.25–0.29:1:1.2–1.3; Fl1 2.9–3.3 × as long as broad, 0.71–0.83 × UID; Fl11 3.0–3.1 × as long as broad, 1.2–1.3 × as long as Fl10. MESOSOMA . Pronotum with declivity almost vertical; dorsum rather flattened longitudinally, in dorsal view, gently narrowing anteriorly; posterior margin arcuate but subangulate medially. Mesoscutum not reflexed but slightly and narrowly raised posterolaterally with parapsidal sulcus deeply impressed, divergent anteriorly. Disc of scutellum slightly raised above level of mesoscutum; scutellum lateral to disc steeply sloped. Metapostnotum slightly depressed, 0.22–0.25 × as long as metanotum at midline ( -Fig.4C +Fig.4C ). Propodeal dorsum rather flattened medially with lateral margins slightly convergent posteriorly ( -Fig. 4C +Fig. 4C ); declivity as long as dorsum, flattened but not delimited from dorsum. WINGS ( -Fig. 4A +Fig. 4A ). Marginal cell distanced from wing tip by 0.55–0.59 × its own length. SMC2:SMC3= 1: 0.63–0.92 on vein Rs , 1:0.96–1.2 on vein @@ -411,9 +412,9 @@ originating slightly posteriorly to separation of vein COLOURATION . Body largely black ( -Fig. 4G–I +Fig. 4G–I ). Mandible dark rufous apically. T1 below lateral crease and T2–3 lateroventrally often reddish brown. T6 with large ivory white spot apicodorsally. Legs almost entirely reddish brown ( -Fig. 4G–H +Fig. 4G–H ), but in two specimens from @@ -434,17 +435,17 @@ Island, mid and hind femora and tibiae mostly black, at most mid tibia basally a HEAD . 1.2–1.3 × as broad as high. Vertex ( -Fig. 4E +Fig. 4E ) strongly convex above level of eye tops, chevron-shaped. Upper frons with a pair of oblique or arcuate ridge lines, these, in some specimens, being not distinctly raised but merely impunctate smooth lines. Frontal sulcus usually indistinct, at most shortly impressed below. Antennocular line strongly inclined; supra-antennal tubercle, in dorsal view, strongly produced, trapezoid. Inner orbits ( -Fig. 4E +Fig. 4E ) slightly emarginate above middle, distinctly divergent above. UID 1.2–1.3× LID. POD:OOD:OOcD =1:1.3–1.5:1.6–1.9. Ocellar triangle right-angled; anterior ocellus much larger than posterior ocellus. Upper frons shallowly and broadly depressed. Clypeus 2.3–2.6 × as broad as long, slightly convex medially; apical rim narrow, slightly depressed; apical margin slightly concave. Scape barely curved outward, triangularly produced apicomedially. Scape:pedicel:F1:F2=1.2– 1.4:0.36–0.52:1:1.0–1.1; Fl1 1.6–1.8 × as long as broad; Fl11 2.0–2.2 × as long as broad, 1.2–1.3 × as long as Fl10. Gena, in dorsal view, rather strongly receding posteriorly but thicker than in female, in profile, 2.6–3.3 × as broad as eye medially, of almost same thickness above and below. MESOSOMA . Pronotum with declivity almost vertical ( -Fig. 4H +Fig. 4H ), slightly concave, smooth and polished, its juncture with dorsum narrowly rounded; dorsum declivous, in dorsal view, gradually narrowing anteriorly ( -Fig. 4I +Fig. 4I ); posterior margin subangularly emarginate. Mesoscutum with median longitudinal ridge. Metapostnotum 0.47–0.64 × as long as metanotum at midline, slightly constricted both medially and in front of spiracle, with distinct median triangular smooth depression on its apical two-thirds. Propodeum, in dorsal view, arcuately narrowing posteriorly; dorsum, in lateral view, gently sloped and gradually merging into declivity. @@ -482,7 +483,7 @@ originating slightly posteriorly to separation of vein METASOMA . Slightly narrower than mesosoma. T1 almost as long as broad, with lateral crease slightly curved unlike in female, almost reaching posterior margin of T1 ( -Fig. 4F +Fig. 4F ). @@ -491,15 +492,15 @@ originating slightly posteriorly to separation of vein AND GENITALIA ( -Fig. 5 +Fig. 5 ). Subgenital plate, in ventral view ( -Fig. 5A +Fig. 5A ), gradually narrowing toward apex, rounded apically with a pair of deep oval depressions subbasally, leaving median sharp carina, that being low triangular in profile; ventral surface with short setae but bare on lateral and apical margins. Paramere ( -Fig. 5B +Fig. 5B ) short and stout, not exceeding beyond apex of digitus volsellaris, arcuately emarginate ventrally, wedge-shaped apically with short setae except basally and a few long setae apically; digitus volsellaris broadened apically, plectrum-shaped, much extending beyond apex of aedeagus with dense micropores; parapenial lobe elliptic apically, not extending beyond apex of aedeagus; aedeagus narrowly fusiform. - + Fig. 5. diff --git a/data/13/C1/04/13C104C25631590C8D028F9DD6D44D87.xml b/data/13/C1/04/13C104C25631590C8D028F9DD6D44D87.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..49c584380e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/13/C1/04/13C104C25631590C8D028F9DD6D44D87.xml @@ -0,0 +1,306 @@ + + + +A new species of the genus Serangium Blackburn (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) from China, with description of the immature stages + + + +Author + +Huang, Chu-Yang +0000-0001-5943-7088 +College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China + + + +Author + +Zeng, Li-Ling +https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9858-0638 +College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China + + + +Author + +Fan, Wu-wei +Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China + + + +Author + +Lin, Ping +Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China + + + +Author + +Dong, Qi-Jin +Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China + + + +Author + +Su, Yu-Long +Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China + + + +Author + +Wang, Xing-Min +College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China + +text + + +ZooKeys + + +2024 + +2024-08-23 + + +1210 + + +197 +206 + + + +journal article +301686 +10.3897/zookeys.1210.129040 +b809a33b-55f6-4ddd-bddf-83c8ed06f758 +DA3F199E-FF14-4D13-A779-87CAB9A98B9D + + + + + +Serangium +Blackburn, 1889 + + + + + + + + +Serangium + +Blackburn, 1889: 187 +, 209. Type species, monotypy: + +Serangium mysticum +Blackburn, 1889 + +. + + + + + + + + + +Serangium + + +: + +Sicard 1909: 150 + +, 151; + +Chapin 1940: 268 + +; + +Miyatake 1961: 50 + +; + +Sasaji 1971: 52 + +; + +Pang and Mao 1979: 27 + +; + +Miyatake 1994: 238 + +; + +Ślipiński and Burckhardt 2006: 39 + +; + +Ślipiński 2007: 53 + +; + +Wang et al. 2011: 33 + +. + + + + + + + + +Semichnoodes + +Weise, 1892: 15 +. Type species, monotypy: + +Semichnoodes kunowi +Weise, 1892 + +. Synonymized by + +Weise 1908: 13 + +. + + + + + + + + + +Catana + +Chapin, 1940: 266 +. Type species, original designation, + +Catana clauseni +Chapin, 1940 + +. Synonymized by + +Ślipiński and Burckhardt 2006: 39 + + + + + + + + + +Diagnosis. + + +Body minute, length ranging 1.0– +2.5 mm +, hemispherical, with head resting closely against prosternal anterior margin at rest; dorsum glossy, bearing sparse, long, thin setae. Mandible small, triangular, with single apical tooth and reduced mola (Fig. + +2 g + +); maxillary palps geniculate, palpomeres 2 and 3 closely fitting along stipes, and terminal maxillary palpomere conical or barrel-shaped, always longer than wide (Fig. +2 e +). Antenna composed of nine antennomeres, antennomere 1 club-shaped and antennomere 3 moderately to strongly elongate (Fig. +2 h +). + + + + + + + +Serangium xinpingensis + +sp. nov. +a +– +c +habitus photos: +a +dorsal view +b +lateral view +c +front view +d +prothorax, ventral view +e +maxilla, ventral view +f +labium, ventral view +g +mandible, dorsal view +h +antenna, dorsal view +i +posterior leg, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm ( +a – d, i +); 0.1 mm ( +e, h +); 0.05 mm ( +f, g +). + + + +Pronotum short, strongly transverse (Fig. +2 d +). Scutellum large, triangular. Prosternum strongly protruding medially, forming a broad lobe partly covering mouthparts; prosternal process subtruncate apically, broad. Femora, particularly profemora, broad and flat, closely fitting into depressions on ventral surface and shielding tibiae and tarsi. Elytra smooth, strongly convex, without visible punctures; epipleura extending completely to apex with well-defined cavities accommodating tips of meso- and metafemora (Fig. +2 a – c +). + + +Abdomen with ventrites 1 and 5 notably longer than ventrites 2–4 together (Fig. +3 a +). Postcoxal line on abdominal ventrite 1 complete, extending to metanepisternum, without associated pits or pores (Fig. +3 a +). + + + + + + +Genitalia of adults of + +Serangium xinpingensis + +sp. nov. +a +abdomen, ventral view +b +– +d +male genitalia: +b +penis, lateral view +c +tegmen, ventral view +d +tegmen, lateral view +e +– +f +female ovipositor: +e +spermatheca +f +coxites, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/C1/05/30/C1053060B8618018FF46FDB1FA7447F6.xml b/data/C1/05/30/C1053060B8618018FF46FDB1FA7447F6.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3dac52e54e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/C1/05/30/C1053060B8618018FF46FDB1FA7447F6.xml @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ + + + +Lulesia umbrinomarginata (Entolomataceae, Agaricales), a newly discovered species from Southern China + + + +Author + +Xiao, Ying-Qun +0009-0003-2851-0256 +College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China +202220142775@hunnu.edu.cn + + + +Author + +Xu, You-Di +0009-0004-8112-639X +College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China +xuyoudi0112@163.com + + + +Author + +Chen, Zuo-Hong +0000-0001-7359-0257 +College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China +chenzuohong@263.net + + + +Author + +He, Zheng-Mi +0000-0001-8754-3427 +College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China +zhengmihe@hunnu.edu.cn + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2024 + +2024-05-23 + + +650 + + +1 + + +60 +72 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.650.1.5 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.650.1.5 +1179-3163 +13216247 + + + + + + +Key to the known + +Lulesia + +species in +China + + + + + + + +1. Pileus grey, brown, grey brown or beige-ochraceous; pileus surface with a positive red reaction to KOH; lamellar trama irregular ............................................................................................................................................................................................................2 + + +- Pileus white to greyish white, yellowish white or pinkish white; pileus surface with a negative reaction to KOH; lamellar trama regular.................................................................................................................................................................................................3 + + + + + +2. Basidiospores 4.5–6.0 × 4.0–5.0 μm, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid ............................................................................. + +L +. +mundula + + + + + +- Basidiospores 6.0–7.0 × 5.0–6.0 μm, broadly ellipsoid .................................................................................... + +L +. +umbrinomarginata + + + + + + + +3. Basidiospores subglobose to broadly ellipsoid................................................................................................................... + +L +. +colorata + + + + +- Basidiospores globose to subglobose .................................................................................................................................................4 + + + + + +4. Pileipellis and stipitipellis gelatinized .............................................................................................................................. + +L +. +orientalis + + + + + +- Pileipellis and stipitipellis not gelatinized............................................................................................................. + +L +. +borealichinensis + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/C1/05/30/C1053060B86C801BFF46FF6FFAFC41D5.xml b/data/C1/05/30/C1053060B86C801BFF46FF6FFAFC41D5.xml index 69c34921b4e..69d58a50b63 100644 --- a/data/C1/05/30/C1053060B86C801BFF46FF6FFAFC41D5.xml +++ b/data/C1/05/30/C1053060B86C801BFF46FF6FFAFC41D5.xml @@ -1,75 +1,76 @@ - - - -Lulesia umbrinomarginata (Entolomataceae, Agaricales), a newly discovered species from Southern China + + + +Lulesia umbrinomarginata (Entolomataceae, Agaricales), a newly discovered species from Southern China - - -Author + + +Author -Xiao, Ying-Qun -0009-0003-2851-0256 -College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China -202220142775@hunnu.edu.cn +Xiao, Ying-Qun +0009-0003-2851-0256 +College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China +202220142775@hunnu.edu.cn - - -Author + + +Author -Xu, You-Di -0009-0004-8112-639X -College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China -xuyoudi0112@163.com +Xu, You-Di +0009-0004-8112-639X +College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China +xuyoudi0112@163.com - - -Author + + +Author -Chen, Zuo-Hong -0000-0001-7359-0257 -College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China -chenzuohong@263.net +Chen, Zuo-Hong +0000-0001-7359-0257 +College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China +chenzuohong@263.net - - -Author + + +Author -He, Zheng-Mi -0000-0001-8754-3427 -College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China -zhengmihe@hunnu.edu.cn +He, Zheng-Mi +0000-0001-8754-3427 +College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China +zhengmihe@hunnu.edu.cn -text - - -Phytotaxa +text + + +Phytotaxa - -2024 - -2024-05-23 + +2024 + +2024-05-23 - -650 + +650 - -1 + +1 - -60 -72 + +60 +72 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.650.1.5 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.650.1.5 -journal article -10.11646/phytotaxa.650.1.5 -1179-3163 +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.650.1.5 +1179-3163 +13216247 - + @@ -81,13 +82,15 @@ Y.Q. Xiao, L.Q. Huang & Z.M. He sp. nov. ( -Figs. 2–4 +Figs. 2–4 ) + + MycoBank: MB851831 - + Etymology:— @@ -96,6 +99,8 @@ Etymology:— ’ (Latin), referring to the wood brown pileus margin. + + Diagnosis:—This species exhibits a brown-hued, zonate, depressed pileus, pale yellow-brown decurrent lamellae, a whitish eccentric stipe with basal rhizoids, white decurrent lamellae, and angular basidiospores. Similar to @@ -105,7 +110,8 @@ Diagnosis:—This species exhibits a brown-hued, zonate, depressed pileus, pale , but differs by its relatively larger basidiospores (6.0–7.0 × 5.0–6.0 μm), which are almost always broadly ellipsoid. - + + FIGURE 2. @@ -120,7 +126,7 @@ Fresh basidiomes, MHHNU 20022 (holotype); Dried basidiomes, MHHNU 20023. Bars = 1 cm, photographed by Zheng-Mi He. - + FIGURE 3. Microscopic features of @@ -136,27 +142,45 @@ Basidia; Pileipellis. Bars = 10 μm, drawn by Ying-Qun Xiao. + Type:— + CHINA . Guangdong Province -: Huidong County, Xunliao Bay, on leaf litter of +: +Huidong County +, +Xunliao Bay +, on leaf litter of + Acacia confusa -Merr. +Merr + +. , alt. -20 m + +20 m + , at 22°42'0.07''N , 114°45'3.33''E , -30 June 2023 -, Z.M. He 22, MHHNU 20022 ( + +30 June 2023 + +, +Z.M. He +22, +MHHNU 20022 +( holotype !). + Gene sequences ex-holotype:—PP060629 (ITS); PP059604 (LSU); PP158701 ( @@ -167,6 +191,8 @@ Gene sequences ex-holotype:—PP060629 (ITS); PP059604 (LSU); PP158701 ( ATP6 ). + + Description:— Fruitbody @@ -207,13 +233,18 @@ a cutis, composed of parallel to subparallel, thin- to slightly thick-walled (up Clamp connections absent in all tissues. + + Ecology:—Gregarious, on decaying fallen leave, in subtropical regions; summer. + + Distribution:—Only known from Southern China . - + + FIGURE 4. Basidiospores of @@ -223,14 +254,13 @@ Basidiospores of (MHHNU 20022, holotype) under SEM. Bars = 1 μm, photographed by JianFeng Zou. - + + Additional specimen examined:— CHINA . Guangdong Province -: Huidong County, Xunliao Bay, on leaf litter of - - +: Huidong County, Xunliao Bay, on leaf litter of Acacia confusa diff --git a/data/F4/48/87/F44887B1FFCFA924B0F9FAC298CA475F.xml b/data/F4/48/87/F44887B1FFCFA924B0F9FAC298CA475F.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2138f7b46b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/F4/48/87/F44887B1FFCFA924B0F9FAC298CA475F.xml @@ -0,0 +1,742 @@ + + + +A new species of Impatiens from the Nelliyampathy region of southern Western Ghats, India + + + +Author + +Sindhu, Arya +0000-0002-2029-2456 +PG & Research Department of Botany, PSG College of Arts & Science, Coimbatore, 641014 +aryasindu001@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Anilkumar, Venugopalan Nair Saradhamma +0000-0002-3809-2620 +Government College Kasaragod, Kerala- 671123, India +vsanilbotany@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Pilllai, Ambika Viswanathan +0000-0002-6807-0991 +Department of Botany, Government Victoria College, University of Calicut, Palakkad, Kerala- 678001, India +ambikameenu123@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Philip, Alen Alex +0000-0002-4164-7738 +Department of Botany, Government Victoria College, University of Calicut, Palakkad, Kerala- 678001, India +alenloveplants@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Sojan, Jose +0000-0002-9763-9251 +Department of Botany, Government Victoria College, University of Calicut, Palakkad, Kerala- 678001, India +sojanchakkalackal@gmail.com + + + +Author + +Suresh, Veerankutty +0000-0001-7350-9236 +Department of Botany, Government Victoria College, University of Calicut, Palakkad, Kerala- 678001, India +sureshmagnolia@gmail.com + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2024 + +2024-05-23 + + +650 + + +1 + + +83 +92 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.650.1.7 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.650.1.7 +1179-3163 +13216237 + + + + + +Impatiens minnamparaensis +Sindhu Arya, Ambika, Alen Alex, V.Suresh, Sojan & V.S.A.Kumar. + +, + +sp. nov. + + + + + +( +Figure 1 +& +2 +) + + + + + +Type +: +India +, +Kerala +, +Palakkad District +: +Minnampara +, +10°31’44.7” N +; +76°43’11.5743”E +, ± + +600m + +, + +4 Dec 2021 + +, +Arya, Suresh, Sojan +& +Anilkumar 1198 +( +holotype +: UCBD; + + +isotype +: UCBD). + + + + + +Diagnosis: + +Impatiens minnamparaensis + +is most similar to + +I. sasidharanii + +in absence of dorsal auricle and spur structure but differs in having leaves (ovate-oblong in + +I. minnamparaensis +vs. + +linear-lanceolate in + +I. sasidharanii + +), flowers (milky white to pinkish white with a prominent blotch at the throat +vs. +dull white, yellow or bluish tinged white with no spots at the throat), distal lobe (dolabriform or hatchet shaped, milky white +vs. +orbicular or obovate, rounded at apex, dull white to yellow or pale pink), basal lobe (conical, white +vs. +ovate, obtuse to acute at apex, dull white to yellow or pale pink) lower sepal (saccate, dull white with pale pink tip and red stripes +vs. +boat shaped, pink without any stripes), dorsal petal (ovate-ovoid, beak at the base prominent, white to pink; keel absent or often faintly present +vs +. broadly ovate, beak at the base not prominent or absent, dull white to yellow to pink, keel mucronate), lateral sepal (linear-falcate, pinkish white +vs. +linear-lanceolate, glabrous, pale green, pale yellow or purple) and pollen (4 colpate cushion shaped +vs. +3 colpate spherical). + + +The new species also resembles + +I. rupicola + +in terms of shape of leaf and habit but differs with respect to pedicel ( +3–4 cm +long with fine puberulous two line in flower and fruit in + +I. rupicola +vs. + +1–2 cm +long, glabrous in + +I. minnamparaensis + +) dorsal auricle (present +vs. +absent) and pollen (rod shaped +vs. +cushion shaped). + + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Impatiens minnamparaensis + +. A. Habit;B. Flowering twig; C.Nectaries on nodes;D. Flower;E. Flower (front view); F. Dorsal petal;G. Lateral sepal; H. Standarad keel petal;I. lower sepal;J. Spot on lower sepal;K. Stamen; L. Gynoecium; M. Seed. + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Impatiens minnamparaensis + +(illustration).A. Habit; B. Nectaries on nodes; C. Flower (side view); D. Dorsal petal; E. Lateral sepal; F. Standard keel petal; G. & I. Lower sepal; H. Flower (front view); J. Stamen; K. Gynoecium; L. Seed. + + + + +FIGURE 3. +Micromorphology +A. Pollen ( + +Impatiens sasidharanii + +); B. Pollen surface ( + +Impatiens sasidharanii + +); C. Pollen ( + +Impatiens minnamparaensis + +); D. Pollen surface ( + +Impatiens minnamparaensis + +). + + + + +Description (macromorphology):—Herbs, +4–10 cm +tall. Stems simple branched, purple, non-sticky, terete at base, pubescent on younger shoot, older part glabrous, internodes +1.5–2 cm +long, extrafloral nectaries absent, glabrous. Leaves simple, opposite decussate; lamina 1.5–2.3 × +1–1.5 cm +, ovate-oblong, slightly serrate at margins, often wavy, cordate at base, acute at apex, dark green above, pale green below, with scattered uniseriate moniliform trichomes on upper surface, glabrous lower surface; petioles +0.5–0.7 cm +long, grooved, glabrous, inconspicuous in the younger leaves Flowers 1 per axil, rarely 2, 8–15 × +6–8 mm +, milky white to pinkish white; pedicel +1–2 cm +long, glabrous, purple; lateral sepal 2.5–3 × +0.5 mm +, linear-falcate, pinkish white; dorsal petal 1.5–2 × +1.5–2 mm +, ovate-ovoid, beak at the base prominent, white to pink; keel absent or often faintly present; lateral united petals 7–9 × +2.5–3 mm +, 2 lobed; basal lobe 2–2.5 × +1.5–2.5 mm +, conical, obtuse to round at apex, white; distal lobe 2.5 × +4.5 mm +, dolabriform or hatchet shaped, rounded at apex without dorsal auricle, milky white; lower sepal 3.5–4 × +1.5–3 mm +, saccate with beaked apex, glabrous, dull white with pale pink tip with prominent red blotch at the throat, tip curved; spur +0.2–0.3 mm +long, cylindrical, stout, curved, glabrous, yellow-green. Stamens 5; filaments +1.1–1.2 mm +long, united, purple, papery; anthers united, oval, extrorse, yellow, longitudinally dehiscing. Pistil 1.5–2.0 × +0.5–1 mm +; ovary oblate. Capsule +1–1.2 cm +long, ellipsoid or ovate, glabrous; seeds, ca. +1 mm +, 1–2 per capsule, ellipsoidal, glabrous, shining, brownish-black. + + + +FIGURE 4. +Distribution map of + +Impatiens minnamparaensis + +. + + + +Description (micromorphology):—Pollen 4 colpate, 17.5µm × 17.9µm. Surface pattern roughly reticulate forming a non angular apocolpia which is prominent. Mesocolpia is faintly distinguished. Muri measures ca 1 µm, baculate, lumina ca 1.7 µm. intra and inter-luminar bacules are present, +6–10 in +each, often free or even fused. + + + + +Distribution and habitat:—Known only from Minnampara, Nelliyampathy, Palakkad district in +Kerala +, where it grows on open grasslands. + + + +Phenology:—Flowering and fruiting from August to December. + + + +Etymology:—The specific epithet + +Impatiens minnamparaensis + +corresponds to the +type +locality Minnampara, which a biodiversity rich spot in the Nelliyampathy hills. + + + + +Conservation status:—The new species is studied from two subpopulations in a protected area, each separated by a distance of + +500 m +. + +The estimated Extent of Occurrence (EOO) is +5 km +2 +and the Area of Occupancy (AOO) is less than +8 km +2 +. The number of mature individuals is estimated to 30–40, when considering all the localities. Even though the area is under protected forest area, stamping by wild animals and intrusion of visitors by jeep travel forms a threat. Nevertheless, we recommend that the species be categorized as Endangered [EN] based on criterion D: population size estimated to number less than 250 mature individuals ( +IUCN, 2012 +). The population had been studied for 3 seasons in the area and there is a population decline percentage of 8 % in the population of + +I. minnamparaensis + +from Nelliyampathy hills. + + + + +Additional specimens examined. + +INDIA +. +Kerala +:— +Palakkad district +: +Nelliyampathy +, +Minnampara +10°31’44.7” N +; +76°43’11.5743”E +± + +600 m + +, + +29 November 2021 + +Sojan & Suresh 1200 +(UCBD); + +20 October 2022 + +Arya & Alen 2311 +(UCBD). + + + + +I. rupicola + + +INDIA +. +Kerala +: +Palakkad district +: +Nelliyampathy +, +Minnampara +10°31’44.7” N +; +76°43’11.5743”E +, ± + +600 m + +, + +29 November 2021 + +Sojan & Suresh 1222 +(UCBD); + + + +20 October 2022 + +Arya & Alen 2313 +( +UCBD +); +Idukki district +: +Cheruthoni +, 9 +◦ +8613” N 76.96 +◦ +E + +30 August 2022 + +Arya +1671 ( +UCBD +) + +. + + + + + +I. sasidharanii + + +INDIA +. +Kerala +: +Palakkad district +: +Nelliyampathy +, +Minnampara +10°31’44.7” N +; +76°43’11.5743”E +, ± +600 m +, +29 November 2021 +Sojan & Suresh 1225 +(UCBD); + + +20 October 2022 +Arya & Alen 2315 +(UCBD). + + + + +TABLE 1. +Morphological comparison between + +Impatiens minnamparaensis +I. rupicola + +and +I. sasidharanii +. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Characters + + +Impatiens minnamparaensis + + + +Impatiens sasidharanii + + + +I. rupicola + +
LeavesOvate-Oblong pubescent, glandular trichome presentLinear-lanceolate, glabrous, trichomes absentOvate-oblong or linear
Inflorescence1 or 2 flower per axilFlowers 2–4 per axils3–5 per axil
Flower8–15 × 6–8 mm, milky white to pinkish white with a prominent blotch at the throat12–16 × 8–10 mm, dull white, yellow or bluish tinged white with no spots at the throat7–9 × 5–6 mm, dull white or white with 2 pink spots at the throat
Basal lobe ovate, obtuse to acute at apex, dull white to yellow or pale
Basal lobe roughly conical, whitepinkBasal lobe ovate, apex round, pink
Standard keel petalDistal lobe dolabriform or hatchetto purple; Distal lobe ovate or
shaped, whiteDistal lobe orbicular or obovate, rounded at apex, dull white to yellow or pale pinkobovate, apex round
Dorsal petal1.5–2 ×1.5–2 mm, ovate-ovoid, beak at the base prominent, white to pink; keel absent or often faintly present.5.5–6.5 ×5–6 mm, broadly ovate, beak at the base not prominent or absent, dull white to yellow to pink, keel mucronate6.5–7.5 ×4–5 mm, broadly ovate, dull white to yellow to pink, keel mucronate
Lower sepalSaccate with beaked apex, white with red stripesBoat shaped, pink without any stripesDolabriform, pink without stripes
Lateral sepal2;5–3 × 0.5.5 mm, linear-falcate, pinkish white3.5–6 × ca. 0.5–0.75 mm, linear lanceolate, glabrous, pale green, pale yellow or purple6–10 mm long, glabrous
CapsuleOvate with seeds 1–2 per capsuleLong ellipsoidal beaked, glabrous, seeds 10 per capsuleEllipsoidal, many seeds
AntherYellowWhitePink
Pollen4 colpate square3 colpate spherical3 colpate spherical
+ + +Taxonomic notes: + +— +I. minnamparaensis + +grows in the open muddy grasslands in the interior of Nelliyampathy hills. The habitat is similar to the other + +Impatiens +spp + +found in this area. + +Yu +et al. +(2015) + +gave a worldwide classification of + +Impatiens + +into two subgenera subgen. +Clavicarpa +Warb. and subgen. + +Impatiens + +. + +Impatiens minnamparaensis + +belongs to the section + +Uniflorae + +under subgenus + +Impatiens + +characterized by capsule that are short-fusiform, turgid at middle conspicuously, ca. +1 cm +long inflorescence a raceme with 1 (–2) flowers and seed ellipsoid. According to the classification by Bhaskar 2015, + +I. minnamparaensis + +belongs to the section + +Annuae + +characterized by opposite and decussate leaves and black colored seeds. + +I. minnamparaensis + +also shares similarity with + +I. kodachadriensis +Bhaskar & Sringesh (2012:150) + +in terms of milky white corolla but differs with respect to shape of distal lobe (elliptical +vs +. hatchet shaped) shape of basal lobe (elliptical +vs +. ovate) and spur morphology. The new species also resembles + +I. oppositifolia +Linnaeus (1753: 937) + +in terms of opposite leaves but differs with respect to the shape of leaves (linear-lanceolate +vs. +ovate oblong), shape of lower sepal (conical +vs. +saccate) and color of anther (white +vs +. purple). Key to the closely allied species belonging to this section from Western Ghats is given below: + + + + + +Key to the species + + + + + +1a. Stem quadrangular..............................................................................................................................................................................2 + + +1b. Stem not quadrangular........................................................................................................................................................................3 + + + + + +2a. No spots at corolla throat........................................................................................................................................ + +I. kodachadriensis + + + + + +2b. Yellow spot at corolla throat.................................................................................................................................. + +I. eravikulamensis + + + + + + + +3a. Lower sepal glabrous conical and anthers white......................................................................................................... + +I. oppositifolia + +3b. Lower sepal pubescent saccate and anthers lilac or pink .................................................................................................................. 4 + + + + + + +4a. Spur incurved into a hook yellow-pink ........................................................................................................................... + +I. tomentosa + + + + +4b. Spur straight or slightly curved ..........................................................................................................................................................5 + + + + +5a. Flowers light pink to deep pink with dark purple or blue or yellow spot on the throat, spur minute, slightly curved ......................6 + + + +5b. Flowers pink with no spot on the throat; spur slightly yellow to green ....................................................................... + +I. sasidharanii + + + + + + + +6a. Leaves ovate cordate pubescent basal lobe conical white, lower sepal saccate, pollen 4 colpate ....................... + +I. minnamparaensis + + + + + +6b. Leaves obovate oblong or linear; basal lobe ovate purple; lower sepal dolabriform, pollen 3 colpate .............................. + +I. rupicola + + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file