diff --git a/data/03/87/38/038738484200FFF0FF0DFF15FA11F887.xml b/data/03/87/38/038738484200FFF0FF0DFF15FA11F887.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..008773d536b --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/87/38/038738484200FFF0FF0DFF15FA11F887.xml @@ -0,0 +1,399 @@ + + + +The restablishment of Dyckia oligantha and D. nana (Bromeliaceae, Pitcairnioideae), belonging to the D. macedoi complex + + + +Author + +Guarçoni, Elidio Armando Exposto + + + +Author + +Azevedo, Aristéia Alves De + + + +Author + +Costa, Andrea Ferreira Da + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2017 + +2017-05-05 + + +306 + + +1 + + +49 +65 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.306.1.4 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.306.1.4 +1179-3163 + + + + + +2. + +Dyckia nana +Leme & Ribeiro ( + +Leme +et al. +2010: 36 + +) + +, +Figs. 4 E–H +, +5 D–E + + + + + +Type +:— +BRAZIL +, +Minas Gerais +: Diamantina, est. Diamantina para Conselheiro Mata, ca. +10 km +de Conselheiro Mata, +18º18.50’S +, +43º53.43’W +, +1288 m +elev., +25 June 2008 +, fl., +E. Leme, C.C. Paula, T. Coser, R. Moura & O.B.C. Ribeiro 7484 +( +holotype +RB!, +isotype +HB!). + + +Plant +terrestrial, flowering +19–41.5 cm +high. +Leaves +8–17 in +number, rigid, succulent, slightly recurved, forming an asymmetric rosette, caused by the second leaves, 4.4–7 × +7.2–8.7 cm +; +sheaths +suborbicular, ca. 2 × +4 cm +, white with the upper abaxial half brown, white lepidote on the upper third of both surfaces, inconspicuously spinose distally; +blades +narrowly triangular, 3–6.7 × +0.6–1.4 cm +, distinctly canaliculate, green abaxially, vinaceous adaxially, white lepidote on both surfaces, slightly or not obscuring the leaf color, apex acuminate, pungent, margins spinose except for the apical third, spines the basal ones antrorse to patent in the median ones, brown, 0.6–1.4 × +0.1 mm +, +4–10 mm +apart. +Inflorescence +simple, erect, (21.4–) +28–39.6 cm +long; +rachis +orange, +1.1–1.4 mm +in diameter, white tomentose; +fertile part of the inflorescence +4.7–9.5 cm +; +peduncle +erect, terete, (15–) +23.3–31.7 cm +long, +1–1.8 mm +in diameter, green, glabrous, internodes (17–)23–35.1(–40.8) mm long; +peduncle bracts +shorter than the internodes, lower ones 1.3–3.4 × +0.2–0.4 cm +, upper ones 4.6–8 × +1.2–3.4 mm +, ovate to oblong, acuminate, ending in a spine, stramineous, carinate, the lower ones white lanate abaxially, the upper ones glabrous, margins entire. +Floral bracts +equaling or slightly exceeding the pedicels, 3.4–8 × +2.6–5.3 mm +, orange, broadly ovate, patent, convex, ecarinate, acuminate, ending in a spine, white lanate abaxially, margins with fimbriate trichomes along the basal half. +Flowers +5–13 in +number, antrorse, +1.2–1.5 cm +long; +pedicels +evident, orange, (3.2–) +4.2–6.8 mm +long, sparsely white lanate; +sepals +symmetric, reaching the midpoint of the petals, orange, ovate to ellipitc, 4.7–8.3 × +3.1–5.1 mm +, obtuse or with an inconspicuous apiculus, sparsely white lanate abaxially, margins with fimbriate trichomes; +petals +symmetric, orange, rhombic, 7.5–7.7 × +4.2–5.2 cm +, obtuse, margins entire, glabrous; corolla tubular. +Stamens +included; +filaments +pale yellow, linear, +4.8–5.3 mm +long, connate at the base for +1.4–1.5 mm +to form a common tube with the petals, free above it; +anthers +linear, +1.5–1.7 mm +long, acute, recurved at the apex, yellow, dorsifixed near the base. +Ovary +superior part oblong, yellow to pale orange, +3.8 mm +long; +style +yellow, +1.3 mm +long; +stigma +, +0.5–0.9 mm +long, yellow. +Capsules +ovoid, dark brown, 8.6 × 6, +3 mm +, suberect to erect. + + +Additional specimen examined:— + +BRAZIL +, +Minas Gerais +: +Diamantina, Km +165, estr. para +Conselheiro Mata +, MG-220, + +25 February 1987 + +, + +Zappi +et al + +. ( +SPF 46903 +) + +; + + +15 March 1999 + +, + +Rapini +746 & +Kawasaki + +( +SPF +) + +; + +estr. +Diamantina-Conselheiro Mata +, 38 +Km +do trevo de saída de +Diamantina +, + +31 January 2000 + +, + +Forzza +& +Mello-Silva +1510 + +( +BHCB +; SP; +SPF +) + +; + +estr. para +Conselheiro Mata +, lado esquerdo, + +1241 m + +elev., +18º18’24”S +– +43º53’59”W +, + +25 May 2011 + +, + +Guarçoni +1671 & +Paixão + +( +VIC +). +Gouveia +, estr. do lado esquerdo da BR-259 para +Gouveia +, + +5 August 2010 + +, + +Guarçoni +1478 et al. + +( +MACO +). +Presidente Kubitschek +, estr. +Datas +to +Serro, KM +438, +18º33’00”S +– +33º33’00”W +, + +11 March 1998 + +, + +Forzza +et al. 679 + +( +RB +) + +. + + + + +Distribution and habitat: +— + +Dyckia nana + +is endemic to the +Diamantina Plateau +, occurring between 1000 and +1240 m +elevation. The species habit can be terrestrial or saxicolous, and individuals usually occur on soils with quartz rubbles. + + +Phenology +:—Flowering from January to May. + + +Conservation Status +:—The species is critically endangered (CR), as it is known from only three localities, with a total estimated population of less than 250 individuals. These areas are severely affected by annual fires. The species does not occur in Conservation Units. + + + + +Comments +:— + +Dyckia nana + +is mainly characterized by small and asymmetric rosettes with few slightly recurved leaves. Another character that can aid recognition is the suberect flowers at anthesis. + + +The species can be distinguished from + +D. oligantha + +by having fewer leaves (9–17 +vs. +21–41), sheath white-lepidote on the upper third ( +vs. +glabrous), peduncle bracts glabrous ( +vs. +white-lepidote); flowers suberect ( +vs. +slightly reflexed), pedicels +4.2–6.8 mm +( +vs. +2–4 mm +), sepals obtuse ( +vs. +acute), narrower petals ( +4.2–5.2 mm +vs. +5.9–9.2 mm +), and longer style ( +1.3 mm +vs +. +0.8 mm +). + + + +Dyckia nana + +had been synonymized with + +D. macedoi + +by Forzza +et al. +cont. upd. without additional comment. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/87/38/038738484200FFF7FF0DF855FBD1F84E.xml b/data/03/87/38/038738484200FFF7FF0DF855FBD1F84E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d2f01540cae --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/87/38/038738484200FFF7FF0DF855FBD1F84E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,403 @@ + + + +The restablishment of Dyckia oligantha and D. nana (Bromeliaceae, Pitcairnioideae), belonging to the D. macedoi complex + + + +Author + +Guarçoni, Elidio Armando Exposto + + + +Author + +Azevedo, Aristéia Alves De + + + +Author + +Costa, Andrea Ferreira Da + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2017 + +2017-05-05 + + +306 + + +1 + + +49 +65 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.306.1.4 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.306.1.4 +1179-3163 + + + + + +3. + +Dyckia oligantha +L.B. +Smith (1957a: 329) + +. +Figs. 4 I–L +, +6 A–J +, +7 A–E + + + + + +Type +:— +BRAZIL +, +Minas Gerais +: Serra do Cipó, km 131, +1400 m +elev., +24 April 1950 +, +A.P. Duarte 2748 +( +holotype +RB!, +isotype +US Photo!). + + +Plant +saxicolous, flowering +13.3–43.3 cm +high. +Leaves +9–24 in +number, rigid, slightly succulent, suberect, secund, forming an asymmetric rosette, secund, 4.1–9.5(–11.6) cm × 6–16.8(–22.7) cm; +sheaths +suborbicular, 1.8–2 × +2.4– 2.9 cm +, brown at distal end abaxially, glabrous on both surfaces, inconspicuously spinose at the distal part; +blades +very narrowly triangular, 4.2–11.6 × +0.4–0.9 cm +, canaliculate, green, white lepidote on both surfaces, with trichomes concentrated between the ribs and not obscuring the leaf color in between, apex acuminate, pungent, margins spinose, spines the basal ones patent to antrorse in the median ones, brown, 0.7–1.4 × +0.4–0.5 mm +, (3.3–)4.8–9.7(–12.6) mm apart. +Inflorescence +simple, erect, +11.7–25.3 cm +long; +fertile part of the inflorescence +1.4–5.9 cm +; +peduncle +erect, terete, +8.9–19.7 cm +long, +1.3–2.5 mm +in diameter, green to orange, sparsely white lanate to glabrous, internodes 6.2–18.1(–21.3) mm long; +peduncle bracts +, the lower ones longer than internodes, green, ovate to linear-triangular, 0.7–3.3(–4.8) × +0.3–0.6 cm +, the upper ones shorter than the internodes, stramineous with the lower third green to pale orange, ovate to triangular, 3.9–7.3(–10.6) × +1.9–5.7 mm +, ending in a spine, carinate, white lanate on the abaxial surface, margins inconspicuously spinose along the basal third only; +rachis +orange, +1–1.4 mm +in diameter, glabrous. +Floral bracts +equaling to exceeding the pedicels, 3.2–6.3 × +3.2–5.9 mm +, stramineous, broadly ovate to triangular, patent to reflexed with the flowers, carinate, acuminate, ending in a spine, sparsely white lanate on the abaxial surface, margins with fimbriate trichomes. +Flowers +3–13 in +number, spreading to reflexed at the anthesis, +1–1.3 cm +long; +pedicels +evident, orange, +2–4 mm +long, sparsely white lanate; +sepals +symmetric, reaching the midpoint of the petals, orange, elliptic to ovate, 4.5–6.6 × +3.6–5.5 mm +, acute or with an inconspicuous apiculus, sparsely white lanate on the abaxial surface, margins with fimbriate trichomes; +petals +asymmetric, orange, broadly obovate to obtrullate, 7.4–10.5 × +5.9–9.2 mm +, retuse or obtuse, margins entire, glabrous; corolla tubular. +Stamens +included; +filaments +yellow, the antepetalous ones triangular, the antesepalous ones linear, +4.2–6.5 mm +long, connate at the base for 1.1–1.7(–2.1) mm to form a common tube with the petals, free above it; +anthers +lanceolate, +2.8–3.5 mm +long, acute or with an inconspicuous apiculus, dorsifixed near the base. +Ovary +superior part oblong, orange, +3.3–6.6 mm +long; +style +orange, +0.5–1.4 mm +long; +stigma, +0.8–1.1 mm +long, yellow to orange. +Fruits +ovoid, dark brown, +8.6–11 mm +long, +6.3–10 mm +in diameter, suberect to erect. + + +Additional specimen examined:— + +BRAZIL +, +Minas Gerais +: +Jaboticatubas +, +Km +139, ao longo da rodovia +Lagoa Santa—Conceição do Mato Dentro +— +Diamantina +, + +17 April 1972 + +, + +Joly +s.n + +. ( +SP 144937 +) + +; + +Santana do Riacho +, estr. calçada entre +Santana do Riacho-Lapinha +, +19º07’52’’S +– +43º41’56’’W +, + +15 November 2011 + +, + +Guarçoni +1713 + +( +MACO +) + +; + +idem +, + +15 December 2011 + +, + +Guarçoni +1734 + +( +VIC +) + +; + +idem +, + +27 November 2012 + +, + +Guarçoni +2082 + +( +VIC +) + +. + + + + +Distribution and habitat:— + +Dyckia oligantha + +is known only from its +type +area, occurring on quartzite rocky outcrops in Serra do Cipó, at +1168–1290 m +elevation. + +The species can be rupicolous or saxicolous, rarely terrestrial but occur always near rocky outcrops on stony grounds. Individuals grow isolated, never forming clumps. + +Phenology:— +Flowering from November and December. + + +Conservation Status:— +This species is critically endangered (CR), with a total estimated population of less than 250 individuals being known from only two localities. These areas are severely affected by annual fires. + +Dyckia oligantha + +does not occur in Conservation Units. + + + + +Comments:— + +Dyckia oligantha + +was described based on a specimen from Serra do Cipó. For four decades it remained known only from the +type +collection and was considered a synonym of + +D. saxatilis + +by +Forzza & Wanderley (1998) +and +Versieux & Wendt (2006) +. However, + +D. oligantha + +differs morphologically from + +D. saxatilis + +by having a lower mean flowering plant height ( +25.1 cm +vs. +52.9 cm +); asymmetric rosettes with recurved leaves ( +vs. +symmetric rosettes with straight leaves); slender ( +vs. +robust) and longer pedicels (ca. +5.2 mm +vs +. ca. +2.5 mm +), relative longer pedicel to total flower length ratio (40% +vs +. 19.2%), convex sepals ( +vs +. not convex), and filaments free above the petal-stamen ring ( +vs +. connate). + +Inflorescences with more than five flowers have their apical half curved, with slightly secund flowers. Floral bracts enfold half of the pedicel diameter. + +Rauh (1988) described + +D. oligantha +var. +cristalina + +( +syn. nov +.) from +Goiás state +, +Brazil +. However, after analysis of the +type +material, we found that the variety is similar to + +D. machrisiana +L.B. +Smith (1957b: 7) + +. + + + +Guarçoni +et al. +(2010) + +revalidated + +D. oligantha + +, but erroneously indicated the collections numbers +Guarçoni 1241 +, +1273 +, +1274 +, and +1281 +. Those collection numbers actually represent + +D. consimilis +Mez + +, which is not morphologically related to + +D. oligantha + +. + +Dyckia oligantha + +differs from + +D. consimilis + +mainly by the slender and conspicuous pedicels ( +vs +. robust) and free filaments above the petal-stamen ring ( +vs +. connate) in the former. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/87/38/03873848420CFFF1FF0DF890FF7AF9A8.xml b/data/03/87/38/03873848420CFFF1FF0DF890FF7AF9A8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3daeae75c20 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/87/38/03873848420CFFF1FF0DF890FF7AF9A8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,580 @@ + + + +The restablishment of Dyckia oligantha and D. nana (Bromeliaceae, Pitcairnioideae), belonging to the D. macedoi complex + + + +Author + +Guarçoni, Elidio Armando Exposto + + + +Author + +Azevedo, Aristéia Alves De + + + +Author + +Costa, Andrea Ferreira Da + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2017 + +2017-05-05 + + +306 + + +1 + + +49 +65 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.306.1.4 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.306.1.4 +1179-3163 + + + + + +1. + +Dyckia macedoi +L.B. +Smith (1952: 195) + +. +Figs. 4 A–D +, +5 A–C + + + + + +Type: +— +BRAZIL +, +Minas Gerais +: Conceição do Mato Dentro, Serra do Cipó, +15 January 1951 +, +Macedo 2974 +( +holotype +US Photo!). + + +Plant +terrestrial or saxicolous, flowering +15.2–45.3 cm +high. +Leaves +9–39 in +number, rigid, succulent, the basal ones reflexed, the median ones spreading-arcuate to suberect, the upper ones suberect to erect, forming a symmetrical rosette, +4.1–12.3 cm +long, 9.8–19.1(–21.8) cm in diameter; +sheaths +suborbicular, 1.4–2.8 × +0.9–3.4 cm +, white to greenish, pale-brown spotted on the upper half abaxially, cinereous lepidote in the upper third abaxially, inconspicuously spinose of brown spines; +blades +narrowly triangular, 4.4–11.7 × +0.6–1.7 cm +, canaliculate, green, densely cinereous lepidote abaxially, trichomes concentrated between the ribs and not obscuring the leaf color in between, glabrous adaxially, or trichomes slightly or densely concentrates on both surfaces, apex acute, pungent, margins spinose except for the apical third; the basal spines antrorse to patent in the median ones, dark brown, 1–2.2 × +0.4–0.5 mm +, 3–6.7(–7.7) mm apart. +Inflorescence +simple, erect, +13.3–44.5 cm +long; +fertile part of the inflorescence +2–12.3 cm +long; +peduncle +erect, terete, +9.6–35.1 cm +long, +1.3–2.9 mm +in diameter, green, except for the orange distal third, glabrous, internodes +6.7–27.9 mm +; rachis orange, +1.2–1.5 mm +in diameter, glabrous; +peduncle bracts +shorter than internodes, broadly ovate, acuminate, ending in a spine, the lower ones 0.8–3.7 (9.3) × +0.2–0.6 cm +, green, apex densely white lepidote, margins entire, the upper ones 3.6–7.8(–11.2) × 1.8–4.4(–5.5) mm, stramineous, carinate, glabrous, margins ciliate. +Floral bracts +shorter than the pedicels, 2.9–7.3 × 1.1–5.6(–6.4) mm, orange, broadly ovate, patent, convex, ecarinate, acuminate, ending in a spine, serrulate. +Flowers +5–26(–32) in number, polystichously and subdensely arranged, spreading at the anthesis, +1–1.6 cm +long; +pedicels +distinct, orange, 3.4–6.6(–7.8) mm long, glabrous; +sepals +symmetric, reaching the midpoint of the petals, orange, broadly ovate to elliptic, 3.9–5.8 × 3–6.1(–7.6) mm, apex acuminate or with an inconspicuous apiculus, glabrous, margins ciliate of conspicuous marginal trichomes, entire at the lower third; +petals +asymmetric, orange, rhombic, 6.1–8.7 × (4.5–) +5.1–7.5 mm +, obtuse to retuse, margins entire, glabrous, corolla tubular. +Stamens +included; filaments pale yellow, linear, +3–6 mm +long, connate at the base for +0.7–1.9 mm +to form a common tube with the petals, free above it; anthers lanceolate, +2.7–3.1 mm +long, acute or with an inconspicuous apiculus, yellow, dorsifixed near the base. +Ovary +superior part pyramidal, orange, +2.8–4.6 mm +long; style orange, 0.4–1.1(–3.3) mm long; stigma, +0.3–0.9 mm +long, yellow. +Capsules +ovoid, dark brown to black, +7–9.9 mm +long, +4.2–8.4 mm +in diameter, suberect to erect. + + + +FIGURE 4. A–L. +Details of species from the + +Dyckia macedoi + +complex. +A–D +. + +D. macedoi + +. +A. +Detail of the leaf margin, showing the size of spines and the distances between them. +B. +Floral bract. +C. +Flower. +D. +Detail of the flower in longitudinal section. +E–H. + +D. nana + +. +E. +Detail of the leaf margin, showing the size of spines and the distances between them. +F. +Floral bract. +G. +Flower. +H. +Detail of the flower in longitudinal section. +I–L +. + +D. oligantha + +. +I. +Detail of the leaf margin, showing the size of spines and the distances between them. +J. +Floral bract. +K. +Flower. +L. +Detail of the flower in longitudinal section. (Illustrations: Reinaldo Monteiro) + + + + +FIGURE 5. A–C +. + +Dyckia macedoi + +. +A. +Population Km 5 (P1). +B. +Population from Serra do Estreito (P2). +C. +Population from Serrinha (P3). +D–E. + +D. nana + +. +D. +Flowering. +E. +Rosette shape and the substrate over which it occurs. (Photo: Elidio Guarçoni) + + + +Additional specimen examined:— + +BRAZIL +, +Minas Gerais +: +Jaboticatubas +, ao longo da rodovia +Lagoa Santa— Conceição do Mato Dentro—Diamantina +, est. +da Usina +, + +2 November 1972 + +, + +Joly +& +Semir +s.n. + +( +SP 144945 +) + +; + +Serra da Lagoa Dourada +, + +12 February 1996 + +, + +Forzza +162 et al + +. ( +VIC +; +SPF +) + +; + +Serrinha +, +Parque Nacional da Serra do Cipó +, + +18 November 2009 + +, + +Louzada +153 et al. + +( +SP +). +Santana do Pirapama +, +Serra do Cipó +, acesso pela +Faz. Inhame +, estr. de terra ligando +Capela de São José +a +Santana do Riacho +, +18º59’47”S +– +43º45’55”W +, + +5 March 2009 + +, + +Zappi +1681 et al + +. ( +SPF +) + +; + +estr. velha para a mina de manganês, subida da serra, campo de velózias, + +1133 m + +elev., +18º55’26”S +– +43º42’24”W +, + +13 November 2006 + +, + +Zappi +2343 + +( +SPF +). +Santana do Riacho +, ao longo da rodovia BH-Conceição do +Mato Dentro +, estr. +da Usina +, + +21 March 1983 + +, + +Wanderley +582 + +( +SP +) + +; + +Parque Nacional da Serra do Cipó +, +Cachoeira da Farofa +, 7 +September +987, + +Wanderley +s.n. et al. + +( +SP 221692 +) + +; + +Serra do Cipó +, km 110, ao longo da estr. +Belo Horizonte-Conceição de Mato Dentro +, estr. +da Usina +, + +16 September 1983 + +, + +Arraes +s.n. + +( +RB 271813 +) + +; + +3 +Km +ao norte do +Chapéu do Sol +, logo abaixo do +Km +110, + +13 August 1985 + +, + +Rutchison +& +Páffaro +s.n. + +( +RB 245075 +) + +; + +Parque Nacional da Serra do Cipó +, +Serra do Estreito +, + +883 m + +elev., +19°21’27”S +– +43°36’30”W +, + +23 May 2011 + +, + +Guarçoni +1659 & +Paixão + +( +VIC +) + +; + +Serrinha +, + +883 m + +elev., +19°21’19”S +– +43°37’28”W +, + +23 May 2011 + +, + +Guarçoni +1654 & +Paixão + +( +VIC +) + +; + +Serra do Cipó +, MG-10, +Km +5, lado esquerdo em direção +Alto Palácio +, +19º17’26”S +– +43º36’00”W +, + +11 April 2012 + +, + +Guarçoni +1816 + +(R) + +. + + + + +Distribution and habitat:— +This +s +pecies is terrestrial and saxicolous in “Campos Rupestres” vegetation, growing on quartz rocky outcrops in graminoid field, at +883 to 1137 m +elevation, at Serra do Cipó, Espinhaço mountain range. + + +Phenology: +—Flowering from August to May. + + +Conservation status:— +Although + +D. macedoi + +occurs in a Conservation Unit (Parque Nacional da Serra do Cipó), the species was categorized as vulnerable (VU) due to an estimated 30% reduction in size of its population caused by urban growth at Serra do Cipó. + + + + +Comments:— +The species can be easily distinguished from + +D. nana + +and + +D. oliganta + +by its symmetric rosettes ( +vs. +asymmetric) and patent flowers ( +vs. +suberect). The specimens collected in the Santana do Pirapama region ( +D. Zappi 1681 et al. +and +D. Zappi 2343 et al. +) show distinct characters then those found in specimens from the Serra do Cipó population, like the more densely arranged spines (1.5– +1.2 mm +vs. +3–6.7 (7.7) mm) and the lower floral bracts longer than pedicels ( +vs. +shorter than pedicels). + + +The density of leaf trichomes varies according to the habitat and altitude in + +D. macedoi + +( +Table 6 +). Populations may also differ from one another in terms of whether they +form clumps +or not. Individuals from Serra do Estreito often +form clumps +, while those from Serrinha and at km 5 of road MG-010 usually remain isolated under the shadows of subshrubs. + +Style size also varies in these populations. At Serrinha and km 5 of MG-010, individuals have subsessile stigma and very narrow styles. Additional studies on their reproductive biology are needed for a better understanding of these differences. + + +TABLE 6 +. Studied populations from the + +Dyckia macedoi + +complex, showing variations in trichome density according to elevation and + + + +soil +type +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/B3/87/03B387C86157E07EF7C3F995BCEE1C2C.xml b/data/03/B3/87/03B387C86157E07EF7C3F995BCEE1C2C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dec558fdeaa --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/B3/87/03B387C86157E07EF7C3F995BCEE1C2C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ + + + +Phylloporia lespedezae sp. nov. (Hymenochaetaceae, Basidiomycota) from China + + + +Author + +Ren, Guang-Juan + + + +Author + +Wu, Fang + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2017 + +2017-03-21 + + +299 + + +2 + + +243 +251 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.299.2.8 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.299.2.8 +1179-3163 +13689014 + + + + + + +Phylloporia lespedezae +G.J. Ren & F. Wu + +, + +sp +. +nov +. + +( +Figs. 2 +, +3 +) + + +MycoBankno.: MB 819392 + + + +Diagnosis. +—The species is distinct by annual, pileate basidiocarps with wavy edge, circular pores (8–9 per mm), a monomitic hyphal system, thin- to thick-walled hyphae present in tramal, broadly ellipsoid basidiospores (3.1–3.7 × 2.2–2.7 μm), and grows on + +Lespedeza + +( +Fabaceae +) only. + + +Type. +— +CHINA +. +Shanxi Province +, Huguan County, Baquanxia National Park, on base of living + +Lespedeza bicolor + +, +27 Aug 2016 +, Dai 17067 ( +holotype +, BJFC022522). + + +Etymology.— + +Lespedezae +(Lat.) + +: referring to the host tree genus + +Lespedeza + +( +Fabaceae +). + + +Fruiting body.— +Basidiocarps annual, pileate, sessile, corky and without odour or taste when fresh, become hard corky and light in weight when dry. Pilei projecting up to +1.8 cm +, +2 cm +wide and +2 mm +thick at base. Pileal surface brown to yellowish brown from the base to the margin, concentrically zonate and sulcate with narrow zones, tomentose; margin wavy, sterile, yellowish. Pore surface olivaceous buff to clay-buff, slightly glancing; pores circular, 8–9 per mm; dissepiments thin, entire. Tubes slightly paler than context, up to +1 mm +long. Context cinnamon-buff to honeyyellow, up to +1 mm +thick, azonate, duplex, a black line present in the context to separate the upper tomentum of the lower compacted layer, upper layer context soft corky, lower layer hard corky. + + + +FIGURE 1. +Phylogeny of + +Phylloporia + +inferred from the nLSU dataset. The topology is from maximum likelihood analysis. Bootstrap values from maximum likelihood analysis (higher than 50%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (higher than 0.8) from Bayesian inference are labelled at the nodes. The newly sequenced specimens are in boldface. + + + +Hyphal structure.— +Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae simple septate; tissues darkening but otherwise unchanged in KOH. + + +Context. +—Hyphae in the lower context golden yellow, thin- to thick-walled, frequently simple septate, occasionally branched, interwoven or subparallel, 2–3 μm diam; hyphae in the upper tomentum golden yellow, thick-walled, unbranched, occasionally simple septate, loosely interwoven, 3–5 μm diam. + + +Tubes. +—Tramal hyphae thin- to thick-walled, thin-walled hyphae hyaline to pale yellowish, occasionally branched and simple septate, 2–2.5 μm diam, thick-walled hyphae golden yellow, frequently simple septate, occasionally branched, loosely interwoven or subparallel along the tubes, 2.5–3 μm diam. Setae absent; cystidia absent, fusoid cystidioles occasionally present, 13–16 × 3–5 μm; basidia broadly clavate, with four sterigmata and a simple septum at the base, 13–14 × 4–5 μm; basidioles in shape similar to basidia, but slightly smaller. + + +Spores +.—Basidiospores broadly ellipsoid, yellowish, thick-walled, smooth, IKI–, CB–, (3–)3.1–3.7(–3.8) × (2.0–)2.2–2.7(–2.8) μm, L = 3.28 μm, W = 2.34 μm, Q = 1.33–1.45 (n = 180/6). + + +Additional specimens examined. +— +CHINA +. +Shanxi Province +, Huguan County, Baquanxia National Park, on base of living + +Lespedeza bicolor + +( +Fabaceae +), +27 Aug 2016 +, Dai 17065 (BJFC022521), Dai 17069 (BJFC022523), Dai 17072 (BJFC022524), Dai 17074 (BJFC022525), Dai 17076 (BJFC022526). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4360834040D84D2E4BFB5BC16.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4360834040D84D2E4BFB5BC16.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1370eed94bd --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4360834040D84D2E4BFB5BC16.xml @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@ + + + +On the taxonomy of some South American and Australo-Pacific Anthicidae Latreille, 1819 (Coleoptera) with new subfamily and tribe-rank synonymies + + + +Author + +Telnov, Dmitry +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Vienības iela 13, LV- 5401 Daugavpils, Latvia & Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, O. Vācieša iela 4, LV- 1004 Rīga, Latvia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +401 +424 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 +1175-5326 +13628165 +6A91B5D0-0251-4F5C-AA32-D70CAAE55F90 + + + + + + + +Setosicornia curacaoae +( +Gilmour, 1968 +) + +comb. nov. +( +Figs 7‒9 +) + + + + + + +Gilmour (1968: 84 +, 85, 103‒103, pl. 10 fig. 3), as + +Atenizoides curaçaoae + +. + + + + +Type material examined. +Holotype +♂ +BMNH +: +Curaçao +[handwritten] leg. R.H.Cobben [printed] Carmabi Mrt. [handwritten] 195 [printed] 7 [handwritten] [label black framed] // p [handwritten, text red] // +HOLOTYPE +[printed] +♂ +[handwritten] [label red] // +HOLOTYPE +♂ +Atenizoides +mihi curacaoae mihi [handwritten] Det. ‒ E.F. Gilmour [printed] [black frame on top and bottom of the label] // Repin # [printed] 831 +10. 1. 2001 +[handwritten] R. MASH [printed] [label yellowish] // +BMNH +{E} 2002‒157 Dincaster Museum and Art Gallery [printed] // NHMUK014663463 [printed, provided with a QR code] [the antennomeres 10‒11 of the left and 4‒11 of the right antenna, both terminal maxillary palpomeres, the right anterior and posterior leg and the left metatarsomeres 3‒4 missing]. Original designation as +holotype +( +Gilmour 1968 +). The male +paratype +in the Netherland’s ‘Laboratorium voor Entomologie, Wageningen’ ( +Gilmour, 1968 +) has not been studied. + + + + +FIGURE 7. + +Setosicornia curacaoae +( +Gilmour, 1968 +) + + +comb. nov. + +, holotype ♂. A—Habitus, dorsal view; B—ditto, anterodorsal view [not to scale]. + + + + +Redescription. +Holotype +male ( +Figs 7‒9 +). Total body length +7.2 mm +; head length +1.4 mm +(not counting the exposed cranial ‘neck’ of the +holotype +), head width across compound eyes +1.2 mm +, pronotal length +1.4 mm +, maximum pronotal width nearly +1.1 mm +, elytral length +4.4 mm +, combined maximum elytral width +1.6 mm +. Dorsum and venter pale brown. Head subopaque dorsally, moderately glossy ventrally, elliptical, narrowed and slightly prolonged anteriorly. Frontoclypeal suture or impression not observed. Clypeus broadly rounded at anterior margin. Labrum small and narrow (exposed part), emarginate at anterior margin, mandibles exposed. Mandible protruding anteriorly, apex unidentate, tapered (narrowly scooped). Frons very narrow, about 0.4× as wide as dorsal eye length. Compound eye very large, nearly holoptic, strongly protruding from lateral and dorsal outline of head, anterior margin broadly emarginate. Interfacetal setae moderately long and dense, curved. Postocular area very short, head base subtruncate. Head dorsal punctures irregularly shaped (generally elongate), annular to subannular, dense, shallow, with microscopically corrugate background. Intervening spaces smooth, much narrower than punctures. Head dorsal setae variably long, white, generally curved, subdecumbent to erect, dense, not fully concealing dorsal surface of head. Antenna very long and slender and strongly filiform, extending slightly beyond elytral apex when directed posteriorly. All antennomeres available for study with long erect to suberect (mainly on antennomeres 1‒2) setae. Basal antennomere elongate, about 3.7× as long as strongly shortened, slightly transverse antennomere two. Antennomere three about 4× as long as antennomere two. Antennomere four about 1.8× as long as antennomere three, barely shorter than antennomere five. Antennomeres five to nine becomes each gradually longer than preceding: antennomere eight about 1.1× as long as antennomere seven, antennomere nine about 1.05× as long as antennomere eight. Two terminal antennomeres not present for the study. Terminal maxillary palpomere not present for the study. Cranial ‘neck’ wide, about 0.5‒0.6× head width across compound eyes (e.g., half or more as wide as head). Pronotum subopaque dorsally, slightly longer than wide, flattened in dorsal aspect, narrower than head across compound eyes, maximum width in anterior half, lateral margins slightly emarginate posterior to middle. Anterior dorsal flange of pronotum distinct; ventrally and laterally only a narrow anterior collar is present. Suture of anterior flange incision-like deep and narrow laterally, comparatively shallower and broader dorsally. Basal pronotal margin dorsally with a narrow sulcus which widens on lateral margins. Vague median longitudinal impunctate (glossy) sulcus present on anterior half of pronotal disc. Dorsal surface of pronotum with strongly elongate flat punctures (in anterior part and laterally) and irregular narrow rugules (dorsally in posterior part). Intervening spaces glossy, irregularly corrugate, strongly narrower than punctures. Pronotal dorsal setation white, dense, subdecumbent, in part curved, effectively concealing dorsal sculpture of pronotum. Tactile setae not observed. Scutellar shield small, narrow, narrowly rounded at posterior margin, very densely punctate, subopaque. Elytron strongly elongate, slightly glossy, gradually narrowing posteriorly. Humerus broadly rounded. Postbasal transverse impression not indicated. Elytral punctures elliptical, dense and deep. Intervening spaces glossy to microstrigose, narrower than to about as wide as punctures. Elytral setation white, long and dense, in part curved, subdecumbent, directed posteriorly, effectively concealing dorsal sculpture of elytron. Some setae situated closer together than other, building an inconspicuous, white-maculate pattern on elytron. Tactile setae sparse. Sutural stria not present. Epipleuron very narrow, extending towards nearly elytron apex. Metathoracic wing fully developed (functional). Legs very long and slender. Femora thickened, meso- and metafemur somewhat clavate. Tibia straight, very slender, with distinct small spines (mainly in posterior half). Setation on tibiae longer and stronger erect compared to that on femora. Tibial terminal spurs paired, long, margins smooth, apically tapered (pro- and mesotibial spurs) to somewhat rounded (metatibial spurs). Tarsomeres of all legs strongly elongate, penultimate tarsomere somewhat shorter, not bilobate. All pretarsal claws simple, each slightly angulate ventrally at base. Male tergite VII subtruncate at posterior margin ( +Fig. 9A +). Male morphological sternite VII broadly emarginate at posterior margin ( +Fig. 9B +). Male tergite VIII broadly rounded at posterior margin, long setose ( +Fig. 9C +), morphological sternite VIII subtruncate at posterior margin, laterally with a few long setae ( +Fig. 9D +), sternite IX Y-shaped, lateral struts identifiable throughout their membrane-like fusion line until the anterior margin of the sternite ( +Fig. 9E +). Aedeagus ( +Fig. 9F–I +) long and slender. Tegmen elongate, nearly parallel-sided, constricted in apical part, apically rounded; basale slightly less than half as long as apicale, lateral margin with a few small spinules at about midlength of an apicale. Median lobe elongate, slender, with moderately long, rather wide basal struts, lateral margins expanded and inverted laterodorsally, with large, posterolaterad-pointed lateral spines, apex discontinued medially in dorsal view, gonopore armature distinct, of numerous spinules ( +Fig. 9F–G +). + + + +FIGURE 8. + +Setosicornia curacaoae +( +Gilmour, 1968 +) + + +comb. nov. + +, holotype ♂, forebody. A—Head, pro- and mesothorax, ventral view; B—ditto, latero-ventral view; B—Pronotum and mesothorax, lateral view [not to scale]. + + + + +FIGURE 9. + +Setosicornia curacaoae +( +Gilmour, 1968 +) + + +comb. nov. + +, holotype ♂, terminalia and genitalia. A—Tergite VII, dorsal view; B—Morphological sternite VII, ventral view; C—Tergite VIII, dorsal view; D—Morphological sternite VIII, ventral view; E—Morphological sternite IX; F—Aedeagus, median lobe; G—ditto, apex; H—Aedeagus, tegmen; I—ditto, apex [not to scale]. + + + +Sexual dimorphism. +Female is unknown. + + + + +Differential diagnosis. +See previous species. + + + + +Ecology. +Unknown. + + + + +Distribution. +Known only from +Curacao +, +Netherlands Antilles +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887C43610341A0D84D25AB905B826.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C43610341A0D84D25AB905B826.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..181a4ba3b4e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C43610341A0D84D25AB905B826.xml @@ -0,0 +1,216 @@ + + + +On the taxonomy of some South American and Australo-Pacific Anthicidae Latreille, 1819 (Coleoptera) with new subfamily and tribe-rank synonymies + + + +Author + +Telnov, Dmitry +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Vienības iela 13, LV- 5401 Daugavpils, Latvia & Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, O. Vācieša iela 4, LV- 1004 Rīga, Latvia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +401 +424 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 +1175-5326 +13628165 +6A91B5D0-0251-4F5C-AA32-D70CAAE55F90 + + + + + + + +Eurygeniini +LeConte, 1862 + + + + + + + +LeConte (1862: 264) +as ‘Eurygenii’, +type +genus + +Eurygenius +La Ferté-Sénectère, 1849 + +[subsequent informal designation by +Abdullah (1967) +]. + + += + +Ictistygnini +Borchmann, 1936 + + +syn. nov. + + + +Borchmann (1936: 6 +, 12‒13, 534), +type +genus + +Ictistygna +Pascoe, 1866 + +[subsequent designation by +Abdullah (1969) +]. + + +Ictistygnini +(in the present sense as defined by +Abdullah (1969)) +was originally erected by +Borchmann (1936) +as a subfamily (‘Ictistygninae’) in what is now +Lagriinae Latreille, 1825 +, a subfamily of +Tenebrionidae Latreille, 1802 +. +Abdullah (1969) +redefined +Ictistygnini +as follows (in part translated from German, adapted in accordance with the contemporary coleopterological terminology, author’s additions provided in square brackets): ‘procoxa subconically projected’, ‘pronotum with anterior flange’, ‘compound eye prominent’ [in dorsal and lateral aspect], ‘antenna generally filiform’, ‘body elongate and slender’ ( +Borchmann 1936: 13 +), ‘compound ‘neck’ narrow, ‘procoxal cavity closed [externally]’ ( +Borchmann 1936: 534 +). The following four genera (in alphabetical order), + +Diacallina +Champion, 1916 + +(equatorial Africa), + +Egestriomima +Champion, 1916 + +( +Australia +), + +Ictistygna +Pascoe, 1866 + +( +Australia +), + +Ictistygnina +Champion, 1916 + +(South +America +), were originally attributed to +Ictistygnini +by +Borchmann (1936) +. + + +It was +Crowson (1955) +who first pointed on the fact that +Ictistygnini +(in the present sense) is a subgroup of +Anthicidae +(sensu +Crowson (1955)) +rather than +Lagriinae +. +Abdullah (1969) +confirmed this hypothesis and placed +Ictistygnini +as a tribe in +Eurygeniinae +based exclusively of what this author considered ‘front coxal cavity externally closed’ ( +Abdullah 1969: 340 +). + + + + +FIGURE 4. + +Eurygeniini +LeConte, 1862 + +species, venter. A— + +Ictistygnina filicornis +Champion, 1916 + +syntype ♂, ventral view; B—ditto, latero-ventral view; C— + +Ictistygna adusta +Pascoe, 1866 + +♀, ventral view; D—ditto, ♀, ventral pterothorax; E—ditto, syntype ♂, ventral view; F— + +Retocomus duboisi +Abdullah, 1965 + +paratype ♂, ventral view [not to scale]. + + + + +Based on the study of the +type +specimens of both known + +Ictistygnina +species + +(see new combination below) it became obvious that procoxal cavities ( +Figs 4 +, +6B +, +8A‒B +) are narrowly open externally behind (the extensions of the proventrite and hypomeron (propleura) narrowly separated or come in contact or even slightly overlap depending on the condition of the specimen but are never fused together in the sense used in contemporary morphological terminology of Tenebrionoidea), closed internally. Also other phylogenetically important genus-rank features in + +Ictistygnina + +appear be same as those in ‘typical’ +Eurygeniini +. Consequently, a new synonym is introduced. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887C43612341A0D84D6BCB9A6BA6E.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C43612341A0D84D6BCB9A6BA6E.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5883ebc17f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C43612341A0D84D6BCB9A6BA6E.xml @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ + + + +On the taxonomy of some South American and Australo-Pacific Anthicidae Latreille, 1819 (Coleoptera) with new subfamily and tribe-rank synonymies + + + +Author + +Telnov, Dmitry +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Vienības iela 13, LV- 5401 Daugavpils, Latvia & Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, O. Vācieša iela 4, LV- 1004 Rīga, Latvia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +401 +424 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 +1175-5326 +13628165 +6A91B5D0-0251-4F5C-AA32-D70CAAE55F90 + + + + + + +The updated key to the +Eurygeniinae +tribes + + + + + + +This key is simplified and adapted from +Abdullah (1969) +since the morphology of Mitraelabrini has not been comprehensively studied. + + + + + + + +1 Pronotum without anterior flange but with narrow anterior rim dorsally and ventrally; galea very elongate, narrow, ‘tail’- shaped, nearly length of head portion anterior to compound eyes, densely microscopically setose; mandible apex unidentate, acute (not scooped or bidentate); inner margin of male pro- and mesotibia regularly microscopically serrate in distal half................................................................................ Mitraelabrini +Abdullah, 1969 + + + + +‒ Pronotum with anterior dorsal flange present, extending anteriad to fully or partially conceal cranial ‘neck’; galea not elongate or narrow; mandible apex emarginate and excavate (scoop-like) on mesal margin; inner margin of male pro- and mesotibia smooth, irregularly tuberculate or spinose, not regularly serrate............................... +Eurygeniini +sensu novo + + + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887C43612341C0D84D48BBFBBBF4A.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C43612341C0D84D48BBFBBBF4A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1ea51273fc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C43612341C0D84D48BBFBBBF4A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,234 @@ + + + +On the taxonomy of some South American and Australo-Pacific Anthicidae Latreille, 1819 (Coleoptera) with new subfamily and tribe-rank synonymies + + + +Author + +Telnov, Dmitry +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Vienības iela 13, LV- 5401 Daugavpils, Latvia & Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, O. Vācieša iela 4, LV- 1004 Rīga, Latvia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +401 +424 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 +1175-5326 +13628165 +6A91B5D0-0251-4F5C-AA32-D70CAAE55F90 + + + + + + + +Ictistygnina +Champion, 1916 + + + + + + + +Champion (1916: 190) +, +type +species + +Ictistygnina filicornis +Champion, 1916 + +[original designation]. + + + + +The genus was originally placed in the +Lagriidae Latreille, 1825 +( +Champion 1916 +), now a subfamily of + +Tenebrionidae Latreille, +1802 + +in accordance with the present classification ( + +Bouchard +et al +. 2021 + +). Current position of the genus in +Ictistygnini +was first proposed by +Borchmann (1936: 534‒535 +; as ‘Ictistygninae’), which was followed subsequently by several authors. The genus is considered to be monotypic: + +Ictistygnina filicornis + +remains known only from the state of +Rio de Janeiro +in southern +Brazil +( +Champion 1916 +). + + +Champion (1916: 190‒191) +defined + +Ictistygnina + +based on the following set of morphological features: ‘narrowly closed anterior coxal cavities’, ‘extremely elongate antennae, large eyes’, ‘difference in the size of the eyes in the two sexes’ and ‘very small second joint to the unusually elongate, filiform antennae’. The new genus was considered to exhibit similarities with the Australian +Ictistygnini +(in that time sense) genus + +Ictistygna +Pascoe, 1866 + +as well as the Calopodinae A. +Costa +, 1852 genus + +Calopus +Fabricius, 1775 + +( +Oedemeridae Latreille, 1810 +) ( +Champion 1916 +). +Borchmann (1936: 534) +erected a new subfamily ‘Ictistygninae’ in what was +Lagriidae +at that time, and which was downgraded to the rank of a tribe, +Ictistygnini +, in +Eurygeniinae +, +Anthicidae +by +Abdullah (1969: 340) +, where it remains up to now ( +Chandler 2010 +). + + +In this paper I do not aim to review all features of eurygeniine genera or provide a more comprehensive comparative diagnosis for + +Ictistygnina + +but provide only the redescription of this group. + + + + +Supplementary description of + +Ictistygnina + +( +Fig. 5 +) + + + + + + +Type material examined. +Syntype +1♂ +BMNH +( +Fig. 5A‒B +): Fry RioJan [handwritten] // Fry Coll. 1905.100. [printed] // Sp. figured. [printed] // +♂ +[printed] // +Ictistygnina filicornis, Ch. +[handwritten] // dorsal BM 17 [handwritten] // +SYNTYPE +[printed, label circular, blue frame]; +syntype +1♀ +BMNH +( +Fig. 5C‒D +): Fry +RioJano +. [handwritten] // Fry Coll. 1905.100. [printed] // +♀ +[printed] // +Ictistygnina filicornis, Ch. +[handwritten] // +SYNTYPE +[printed, label circular, blue frame]; +syntype +1♂ +BMNH +: Fry RioJan [handwritten] // 2992 [handwritten] // Fry Coll. 1905.100. [printed] // +♂ +[printed] // +Ictistygnina filicornis, Ch. +[handwritten] // +SYNTYPE +[printed, label circular, blue frame]. + + + + +FIGURE 5. + +Ictistygnina filicornis +Champion, 1916 + +. A—Syntype ♂, habitus, dorsal view; B—ditto, forebody, antero-dorsal view: C—Syntype ♀, habitus, dorsal view; D—ditto, forebody, dorsal view [not to scale]. + + + + +Frontoclypeal suture not observed. Mandible apex unidentate, rounded (broadly scooped). Right mandible with an indistinct indentation at inner edge at some distance from apex. Terminal maxillary palpomere subcultriform. Compound eye nearly holoptic, occupying nearly whole head side posterior to antennal insertion, shallowly notched at anterior margin at antennal insertion; posterior eye margin subtruncate to shallowly emarginate.Antennal insertion touching anterior margin of a compound eye in male, slightly distant from it in female. Antenna extraordinarily long and slender, in male extending beyond elytral apex when directed posteriad, in female extending to slightly beyond metacoxal cavity. Antennomeres 3‒11 with moderately long, dense, suberect setae. Antennomere two strongly shortened, slightly transverse to about as long as wide. Terminal antennomere not modified, long and slender. Cranial ‘neck’ about one third head width across compound eyes. Pronotum about as wide as head across compound eyes, about as long (excluding anterior flange) as wide (about 1.2× as long as wide including anterior flange), lateral margins broadly rounded. Anterior pronotal flange distinct and broad dorsally, nearly same wide ventrally as dorsally, dorsally somewhat elevated (compared to a pronotal disc) and projected anteriad to conceal most of cranial ‘neck’. Suture of anterior flange incision-like deep and narrow laterally, shallow and rather broad dorsally. Basal pronotal margin dorsally with a deep and rather wide sulcus which widens on lateral margins. Elytra flattened, strongly elongate. Epipleuron narrow, incomplete. At least distal half of each tibia spinose. Tibial terminal spurs paired, elongate, straight to barely curved, margins smooth, apically acutely angulate. Penultimate tarsomere short, distinctly bilobate. Pretarsal claws rather long, each with an indistinct basal indentation. Procoxae elongate, contiguous. Procoxal cavity narrowly open externally behind (propleura narrowly separated or come in contact or even slightly overlap depending on the condition of the specimen but are never fused together in the sense used in the contemporary morphological terminology of Tenebrionoidea), closed internally. Postcoxal plate not present. Mesanepisterna meet in front of a triangular mesoventrite, shortly produced anteriorly at place of meeting, building a flat, acutely angulate anterior projection, with a distinct short longitudinal suture at place of meeting. Mesanepisternum expanded laterally, separated from mesoventrite by a distinct, nearly straight suture; a distinct, flat, rugose ventral sulcus separates anterior portion of mesanepisternum from its main portion; less prominent postmarginal and distinct accessory carina present, separated by ventral sulcus (both carinae, separated, by much narrower ventral sulcus, appear also in + +Ictistygna + +); procoxal rest not present; area between anterior and main part of mesanepisternum glossy and glabrous, slightly globose in ventral aspect; posterior margin of mesanepisternum with a row of long, dense setae which continues over along posterior and lateral (external) margins of mesepimeron; most of mesanepisternum glabrous, with sporadic setae. Intercoxal process of mesoventrite narrow, long, elevated in ventral aspect, meets an acute anterior process of metaventrite at about posterior third of mesocoxal cavity; mesocoxal cavities separated. Mesepimeron distinct, broadly subtriangular; long setae not visible in dorsal view. Metaventrite longer than mesosternum, discrimen not observed. Metanepisternum long, narrow. Metacoxal cavities narrowly separated by an acute anterior process of first visible abdominal segment. Male morphological sternite VII emarginate at posterior margin. + + +Sexual dimorphism. + +Ictistygnina + +exhibits a strong sexual dimorphism ( +Fig. 5 +). Female frons is comparatively wider, compound eyes are smaller (and, therefore, cranial ‘neck’ is wider than that of male, about half head width, postocular area longer than in male. Female antenna significantly shorter than that of male, not extending to elytral apex. Female terminal maxillary palpomere is less elongate, more strongly securiform (but still subcultriform in the sense of the commonly used anthicid morphological terminology). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887C43614341F0D84D150BEA1BC72.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C43614341F0D84D150BEA1BC72.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..18123cab054 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C43614341F0D84D150BEA1BC72.xml @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@ + + + +On the taxonomy of some South American and Australo-Pacific Anthicidae Latreille, 1819 (Coleoptera) with new subfamily and tribe-rank synonymies + + + +Author + +Telnov, Dmitry +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Vienības iela 13, LV- 5401 Daugavpils, Latvia & Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, O. Vācieša iela 4, LV- 1004 Rīga, Latvia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +401 +424 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 +1175-5326 +13628165 +6A91B5D0-0251-4F5C-AA32-D70CAAE55F90 + + + + + + + +Setosicornia +Pic, 1911 + + + + + + + +Pic (1911: 117), +type +species + +Setosicornia argentina +Pic, 1911 + +[monotypy]. + + + + +Csiki (1913: 4) +, familial placement in +Ripiphoridae +. + + +Bruch (1915: 244) +, checklist, in +Ripiphoridae +. + + +Lucas (1920: 592) +, checklist [no familial placement given]. + + +Blackwelder (1945: 479) +, checklist, in +Ripiphoridae +. + + +Selander (1957: 94), taxonomy, ‘provisionally referred to the +Pelecotominae +on the basis of published accounts of their external morphology’. + + +Falin (2002: 438) +, taxonomy, ‘ probably do not belong in the family [ +Ripiphoridae +] but have yet to be officially removed and reassigned’. + + +The genus was originally erected without a formal familial placement. The comments by Pic (1911: 117, footnote 3) specifically pointed on an unclear position of this genus: ‘Ce genre, voisin de +Dumbrodianus +[sic!] Pic par la forme de sa tète, semble avoir des caractères communs à différents groupes d’Hétéromères, mais il est très caractérisé par ses antennes très particulières; je reviendrai plus tard sur la place qui semble devoir lui être assignée’. + +Dunbrodianus +Pic, 1904 + +(misspelt ‘ +Dumbrodianus +’ on p. 117 and +118 in +Pic (1911)), is a monotypic South African genus informally placed in the Afreminae Levey, 1985 which is considered to be +incertae sedis +in the Tenebrionoidea ( + +Lawrence +et al +. 2010 + +). However, at the time of description of + +Setosicornia + +(1911) and until the paper by + +Lawrence +et al +. (2010) + +appeared, + +Dunbrodianus + +was considered to be a part of the +Ripiphoridae +(‘in Rhipipltoridum’ as in Pic (1904: 66)). + + + +Setosicornia argentina +Pic, 1911 + +( +Fig. 6 +), the +type +species of its genus, differs clearly from + +Dunbrodianus + +and any other ripiphorid subgroups by the prognathous head with mouthparts slightly declivous, the head base not abruptly constricted posteriorly, the absence of an occipital ridge, the strongly elongate, filiform antenna with slender, long setose antennomeres 3‒11, the broad cranial ‘neck’ which is about 0.6‒0.7× or about 2/3 as wide as head across compound eyes and is not concealed from above by the occiput, the pronotum widest at the midlength and distinctly narrower than the combined elytral width, the posterolateral angles of the pronotum not acutely projecting and not embracing the elytral humeri, the presence of a broad anterior dorsal flange and the basal dorso-lateral sulcus on pronotum, the comparatively broader intercoxal process of first abdominal ventrite, and the symmetrical aedeagus. These features are characteristic for +Eurygeniinae +. Consequently, a new placement in +Eurygeniini +( +Anthicidae +: +Eurygeniinae +) is herewith proposed for + +Setosicornia + +. + + + + += + +Atenizoides +Gilmour, 1968 + + +syn. nov. + + + +Gilmour (1968: 102) +, +type +species + +Atenizoides curacaoae +Gilmour, 1968 + +[original designation]. + + + + +Philips & Ivie (1989: 89) +, new familial placement in +Anthicidae +. + + +This taxon was originally described in +Methiini Thomson, 1860 +of the cerambycine +Cerambycidae +( +Gilmour 1968 +; + +Monné +et al. +2007 + +). It was moved to +Eurygeniinae +Anthicidae +(without tribal placement) by +Philips & Ivie (1989: 162) +. Current position of the taxon in + +Eurygeniini +LeConte, 1862 + +was first proposed by +Chandler (2010: 730) +and subsequently followed by +Gimmel & Johnston (2023) +. The genus was hitherto considered monotypic: its +type +species, + +Atenizoides curacaoae + +, remains known only from +Curaçao Island +, +Netherlands Antilles +, southern Caribbean Sea. + + +Philips & Ivie (1989) +justified the placement of + +Atenizoides + +in +Eurygeniinae +. In turn, its placement in +Eurygeniini +by +Chandler (2010) +was tentative since it was proposed without discussing the morphological features of the genus. + + +After studying the +holotype +of + +Atenizoides curacaoae + +at the BMNH ( +Figs 7‒9 +) I found this taxon congeneric with + +Setosicornia + +and a new synonym is proposed. The present system of the +Eurygeniinae +genera appears suboptimal and several other genera require redefinitions. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361A34140D84D2CBBF8EB8CA.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361A34140D84D2CBBF8EB8CA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b6cbc2e3a03 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361A34140D84D2CBBF8EB8CA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,376 @@ + + + +On the taxonomy of some South American and Australo-Pacific Anthicidae Latreille, 1819 (Coleoptera) with new subfamily and tribe-rank synonymies + + + +Author + +Telnov, Dmitry +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Vienības iela 13, LV- 5401 Daugavpils, Latvia & Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, O. Vācieša iela 4, LV- 1004 Rīga, Latvia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +401 +424 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 +1175-5326 +13628165 +6A91B5D0-0251-4F5C-AA32-D70CAAE55F90 + + + + + + + +Copobaenus +Fairmaire & Germain, 1863 + + + + + + + +Fairmaire & Germain (1863: 236) +, +type +species + +Copobaenus nobilis +Fairmaire & Germain, 1863 + +[subsequent designation by +Abdullah (1969) +]. + + += + +Trichananca +Blackburn, 1891 + + +syn. nov. + + + +Blackburn (1891: 341) +, +type +species + +Trichananca victoriensis +Blackburn (1891) + +by monotypy]. + + + + +The synonymy is based on the studied +type +species of + +Copobaenus + +and + +Trichananca + +which appear congeneric: + + + + + +Type material examined, + +C. nobilis + +. + + +Lectotype +♂ +[designated by +Abdullah (1969:335) +] +BMNH +: +28452 +[handwritten] // TYPE [printed] // Germain [handwritten] // Chili Chillah [handwritten] // Fry Coll. 1905-100. [printed] // Type H.T. [printed, label circular, red frame] // +Copobaenus nobilis Germain +Chili ( +Germain +) [handwritten]. + + + + +Type material examined, + +T. victoriensis + +. + + +Holotype +♂ +[monotypy] +BMNH +: T. 3913 A? [handwritten on a card with the specimen] // Type [printed, label circular, red frame] // +Trichananca victoriensis, Blackb. +[handwritten] // Blackburn coll. 1910-236. [printed]. + + + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Copobaenus nobilis +Fairmaire & Germain, 1863 + +, ♀ from Nahuelbuta National park, Chile. A—Habitus, dorsal view; B—Forebody, dorsal view [not to scale]. Image courtesy A. Degiovanni, Bubano, Italy published in Telnov & Degiovanni (2021). + + + + +The two discussed species appear to be rather similar except that in + +C. nobilis + +( +Fig. 1 +) the compound eye is smaller and lacks interfacetal setae (the setae are present in + +T. victoriensis + +), the postcoxal rests are not present (narrow but well-developed in + +T. victoriensis + +), the mesoventral intercoxal process is narrow (distinctly wider, with lateral edges somewhat margined in + +T. victoriensis + +), the metathorax is considerably longer (less so in + +T. victoriensis + +), the elytra are metallic blue and the ventral pterothorax and abdominal ventrites strongly glossy (slightly glossy in + +T. victoriensis + +), the elytral disc confusedly punctate (the punctures arranged into irregular, partially confused longitudinal rows in + +T. victoriensis + +), and the elytral epipleuron is present but weakly defined (well-defined in + +T. victoriensis + +). The listed features, however, are in my opinion not sufficient enough to treat both genera as valid, and a new generic synonym is introduced. + + +New combinations are therefore proposed for the species previously attributed to + +Trichananca + +: + +Copobaenus apterus +(Lea, 1922) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. bicoloratus + +(Gemminger in Gemminger & Harold, 1870) +comb. nov. +, + +C. cheesmanae +(Telnov, 2019) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. concolor +(King, 1869) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. frenchi +(Pic, 1913) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +fulgidus +(Werner & Chandler, 1995) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. hornabrooki +(Uhmann, 1995) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. inexpectatus +(Telnov & Degiovanni, 2021) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. marziae +(Moore & Vidal, 2005) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. micromelas +(Lea, 1922) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. neotropicus +(Telnov & Degiovanni, 2021) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. nigripennis +(Lea, 1917) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. novacaledonicus +(Telnov, 2019) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. pisoniae +(Lea, 1917) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. poggii +(Telnov & Degiovanni, 2021) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. poqui + +( +Guerrero +& Diéguez, 2018) +comb. nov. +, + +C. rugulosus +(Uhmann, 2007) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. uniformis +(Lea, 1922) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. valenciai +(Moore & Vidal, 2005) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. victoriensis +( +Blackburn, 1891 +) + + +comb. nov. + +, + +C. vinctus +(Erichson, 1842) + + +comb. nov. + + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361B34130D84D480BE01BEF7.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361B34130D84D480BE01BEF7.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a817ad935a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361B34130D84D480BE01BEF7.xml @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ + + + +On the taxonomy of some South American and Australo-Pacific Anthicidae Latreille, 1819 (Coleoptera) with new subfamily and tribe-rank synonymies + + + +Author + +Telnov, Dmitry +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Vienības iela 13, LV- 5401 Daugavpils, Latvia & Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, O. Vācieša iela 4, LV- 1004 Rīga, Latvia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +401 +424 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 +1175-5326 +13628165 +6A91B5D0-0251-4F5C-AA32-D70CAAE55F90 + + + + + + + +Ischyropalpus angustatus +(Pic, 1942) + +comb. nov. + + + + + + +Pic (1942: 12) as + +Micreurygenius angustatus + +. + + + + +Type material examined. +Syntype +, sex unknown, +MNHN +: +Micreurygenius +n. g. +[handwritten] // +M. angustatus +n.sp [handwritten] // [two unread handwritten labels]. + + + + +The studied +syntype +of + +Micreurygenius angustatus + +clearly appears to be a member of +Anthicini +( +Anthicinae +) and not +Eurygeniinae +(see +Chandler (2002) +for the most recent key to the subfamilies of American anthicids) due to the combination of the following features: the anterior margin of pronotum lacking the dorsally protruding flange or collar over / encircling cranial ‘neck’, the cranial ‘neck’ width about a fourth head width across compound eyes, the compound eye rounded at anterior margin (not notched or emarginate as in most +Eurygeniinae +). The +syntype +, although mounted on a card and consequently not studied in detail in ventral view, displays the following features characteristic to + +Ischyropalpus + +(as in +Chandler (2002)) +: the head fully exposed, the cranial ‘neck’ exposed in lateral but hidden beneath occiput in dorsal view, the terminal maxillary palpomere securiform, the pronotum rounded at anterior margin. A new synonym and a new combination are therefore proposed. + + +Unfortunately, a comprehensive note on this species was not kept when I studied the +syntype +, making a proper redescription impossible. The +syntype +is about +3 mm +long, dorsal and ventral forebody dark brown, elytra paler brown. Antenna pale brown, legs yellowish. Dorsal forebody opaque, with dense moderately deep subannular punctures. Intervening spaces on dorsal forebody narrower than punctures. Head base broadly rounded posterior to compound eyes, tempus considerably shorter than eye length. Compound eye large, moderately prominent in lateral aspect. Antenna long, terminal antennomere slender, acutely pointed, about 1.7× as long as penultimate antennomere.Antennomeres 7‒10 of nearly same length, moderately widened distally.Terminal maxillary palpomere narrowly securiform, moderately large. Pronotum about 1.1‒1.2× as wide as head across compound eyes, elongate sybcylindrical, dorsally flattened, broadly rounded at anterior, truncate at posterior margin, antebasal sulcus distinct, present dorsally and laterally. Elytra subparallel, flattened dorsally, punctures less coarse compared to those on dorsal forebody, less deep and ordinary (not subannular). Dorsal vestiture of body yellowish, moderately long, rather sparse, nearly appressed. + + +This species is likely a member of the + +eryngii + +informal species-group as defined by Werner (1966), however, the terminal maxillary palpomere is less strongly securiform. Therefore, the present placement of + +I. angustatus + +to the + +eryngii + +species-group is tentative. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361B34130D84D6BCB832BA79.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361B34130D84D6BCB832BA79.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..53183341a54 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361B34130D84D6BCB832BA79.xml @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + +On the taxonomy of some South American and Australo-Pacific Anthicidae Latreille, 1819 (Coleoptera) with new subfamily and tribe-rank synonymies + + + +Author + +Telnov, Dmitry +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Vienības iela 13, LV- 5401 Daugavpils, Latvia & Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, O. Vācieša iela 4, LV- 1004 Rīga, Latvia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +401 +424 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 +1175-5326 +13628165 +6A91B5D0-0251-4F5C-AA32-D70CAAE55F90 + + + + + + + +Ischyropalpus +La Ferté-Sénectère, 1849 + + + + + + + +La Ferté-Sénectère (1849: 40) +, +type +species + +Anthicus sericans +Erichson, 1834 + +[original designation; subsequent designation of + +A. perplexus +La Ferté-Sénectère, 1849 + +by +Bonadona (1961: 150) +is invalid]. + + += + +Lappus +Casey 1895 + + + +Casey (1895: 656) +, +type +species + +Anthicus nitidulus +LeConte, 1851 + +[subsequent designation by Werner (1966: 191)]. + + += + +Micreurygenius +Pic, 1942 + + +syn. nov. + + + +Pic (1942: 11), +type +species + +Micreurygenius angustatus +Pic, 1942 + +[monotypy]. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361C34140D84D186BD86BFAA.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361C34140D84D186BD86BFAA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d6f8080dcc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361C34140D84D186BD86BFAA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +On the taxonomy of some South American and Australo-Pacific Anthicidae Latreille, 1819 (Coleoptera) with new subfamily and tribe-rank synonymies + + + +Author + +Telnov, Dmitry +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Vienības iela 13, LV- 5401 Daugavpils, Latvia & Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, O. Vācieša iela 4, LV- 1004 Rīga, Latvia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +401 +424 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 +1175-5326 +13628165 +6A91B5D0-0251-4F5C-AA32-D70CAAE55F90 + + + + + + + +Zealanthicus +Werner & Chandler, 1995 + + + + + +New Zealand +; monotypic. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361C34140D84D2D2BDB6BF78.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361C34140D84D2D2BDB6BF78.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..03708f18674 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361C34140D84D2D2BDB6BF78.xml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ + + + +On the taxonomy of some South American and Australo-Pacific Anthicidae Latreille, 1819 (Coleoptera) with new subfamily and tribe-rank synonymies + + + +Author + +Telnov, Dmitry +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Vienības iela 13, LV- 5401 Daugavpils, Latvia & Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, O. Vācieša iela 4, LV- 1004 Rīga, Latvia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +401 +424 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 +1175-5326 +13628165 +6A91B5D0-0251-4F5C-AA32-D70CAAE55F90 + + + + + + + +Lemodinus +Blair, 1913 + + + + + +Australia +; monotypic. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361C34140D84D30EBE3EBDC8.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361C34140D84D30EBE3EBDC8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a13cd41bb80 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361C34140D84D30EBE3EBDC8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + +On the taxonomy of some South American and Australo-Pacific Anthicidae Latreille, 1819 (Coleoptera) with new subfamily and tribe-rank synonymies + + + +Author + +Telnov, Dmitry +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Vienības iela 13, LV- 5401 Daugavpils, Latvia & Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, O. Vācieša iela 4, LV- 1004 Rīga, Latvia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +401 +424 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 +1175-5326 +13628165 +6A91B5D0-0251-4F5C-AA32-D70CAAE55F90 + + + + + + + +Cotes +Sharp, 1877 + + + + + + + +This genus is likely congeneric with + +Copobaenus + +/ + +Lemodes + +. +New Zealand +; eight species. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361C34160D84D026BD22B892.xml b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361C34160D84D026BD22B892.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9ddb7d43410 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/03/C8/87/03C887C4361C34160D84D026BD22B892.xml @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ + + + +On the taxonomy of some South American and Australo-Pacific Anthicidae Latreille, 1819 (Coleoptera) with new subfamily and tribe-rank synonymies + + + +Author + +Telnov, Dmitry +Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Vienības iela 13, LV- 5401 Daugavpils, Latvia & Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, O. Vācieša iela 4, LV- 1004 Rīga, Latvia + +text + + +Zootaxa + + +2024 + +2024-09-02 + + +5501 + + +3 + + +401 +424 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 + +journal article +10.11646/zootaxa.5501.3.1 +1175-5326 +13628165 +6A91B5D0-0251-4F5C-AA32-D70CAAE55F90 + + + + + + + +Copobaenus tristis +Fairmaire et Germain, 1863 + +( +Fig. 2 +) + + + + + + +The specimens figured by Telnov & Degiovanni (2021: 122 figs 46–54) in fact represent two species, + +T. tristis + +(figs 48–49 of the mentioned paper) and a species new to science described herein (figs 46–47 & 50–54 of the same paper). The aedeagus as figured by Telnov & Degiovanni (2021: 122 figs 50–51) does not correspond with that of the +lectotype +of + +C. tristis + +as figured by +Abdullah (1969: 337 +fig. 16). + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Copobaenus tristis +Fairmaire & Germain, 1863 + +, ♂ from Nahuelbuta National park, Chile. A—Habitus, dorsal view; B—Tergite VII, dorsal view; C—Morphological sternite VII, ventral view; D—Tergite VIII, dorsal view; E—Morphological sternite VIII, ventral view; F—Morphological sternite IX; G—Aedeagus, tegmen; H—Aedeagus, median lobe, lateral view [not to scale]. + + + + +Type material examined. + +Lectotype +♂ +MNHN +: +273 ♂ +[handwritten] // +Chili Germain +[handwritten, label greenish] // +CHILI +Copobaenus tristis +. [handwritten] // HOLOLECTOTYPE + +Copobaenus +♂ +tristis Fairmaire + ++ +Germain +, 1863 [handwritten]. + + + +Additional material. +2 specimens +DTC: +CHILE +:Malleco 17kmWAngol, +800m +8.XII.84-16.II.85 S&JPeck,FIT mixedNothofagus // +Copobaenus tristis +det. D.S.Chandler; +7 specimens +MZUF +& +1 specimen +DTC: +CHILE +, prov. +Arauco +, P.N. Nahuelbuta, Pichinahual, +1200m +, +22-Nov-2004 +, leg. J.E. Barriga T., fogging, s/ +N. dombeyi +, +1200 m +, +37°47’S +73°00’ W +// Coleccion J.E. BARRIGA +CHILE +137484 // +Copobaenus tristis Fairm & Germ Det.J.E. Barriga Tuñon 2008 +// Coll. ANGELINI Num. +mag. 2957 +(this material already quoted in Telnov & Degiovanni 2021: 145). + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/03/CD/87/03CD87C1FF88FF8603FD6F51FCDEF805.xml b/data/03/CD/87/03CD87C1FF88FF8603FD6F51FCDEF805.xml index ddd431ef3f1..349160460d2 100644 --- a/data/03/CD/87/03CD87C1FF88FF8603FD6F51FCDEF805.xml +++ b/data/03/CD/87/03CD87C1FF88FF8603FD6F51FCDEF805.xml @@ -1,68 +1,69 @@ - - - -Clinoconidium globosum, nom. nov. (Cryptobasidiaceae) producing galls on fruits of Cinnamomum daphnoides in Japan + + + +Clinoconidium globosum, nom. nov. (Cryptobasidiaceae) producing galls on fruits of Cinnamomum daphnoides in Japan - - -Author + + +Author -Kakishima, Makoto -Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130118, China & University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305 - 8572, Japan +Kakishima, Makoto +Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130118, China & University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305 - 8572, Japan - - -Author + + +Author -Ji, Jing-Xin -Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130118, China +Ji, Jing-Xin +Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130118, China - - -Author + + +Author -Nagao, Hideyuki -School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains, Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia +Nagao, Hideyuki +School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains, Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia - - -Author + + +Author -Wang, Qi -Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130118, China +Wang, Qi +Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130118, China - - -Author + + +Author -Denchev, Cvetomir M. -Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130118, China & Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria & Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130118, China +Denchev, Cvetomir M. +Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130118, China & Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria & Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130118, China -text - - -Phytotaxa +text + + +Phytotaxa - -2017 - -2017-03-21 + +2017 + +2017-03-21 - -299 + +299 - -2 + +2 - -267 -272 + +267 +272 -journal article -10.11646/phytotaxa.299.2.11 -1179-3163 +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.299.2.11 +1179-3163 +13688932 @@ -191,50 +192,50 @@ of the on the fruits, globose to subglobose, brown, 2–3 times bigger than the sizes of the normal fruits, ca. 10–20 mm in diam. ( -Figs 1A, B +Figs 1A, B ); inner tissues consisting of fungal hyphae and deformed plant cells ( -Figs 1C, D +Figs 1C, D , -2A +2A ). Hyphae intercellular, hyaline, compact, septate ( -Figs 2A, B +Figs 2A, B ); haustoria irregular in shape, observed in deformed host cells ( -Figs 2B, C +Figs 2B, C , -3C +3C ). Hymenia formed in peripheral lacunae of galls, yellow to whitish, covered by thick, dark brown pericarps ( -Figs 1C, D +Figs 1C, D ). Basidia clavate, hyaline, depressed, hard to observe, gastroid, 9–15 × 5–8 μm ( -Figs 2B +Figs 2B , -3C +3C ). Paraphyses or sterile hyphae present in the basidial layer, hyaline, thin, long ( -Figs 2A +Figs 2A , -3C +3C ). Basidiospores globose, subglobose or broadly ellipsoidal, hyaline, 5–10 (av. 7) μm long, aggregated in a mass ( -Figs 2D +Figs 2D , -3A–C +3A–C ), wall densely foveolate when mature; producing long branched hyphae with septa when germinated on PDA ( -Figs 2E, F +Figs 2E, F ). - + FIGURE 2. A, B. A hymenial layer of a gall formed by @@ -244,7 +245,7 @@ A, B. A hymenial layer of a gall formed by stained with lactophenol aniline blue solution. A hyphal mass (HM) among deformed plant cells (PC), haustoria (HA) in host plant cell (PC), basidial layer (BL), basidiospores (B), and sterile hyphae (SH). C. Haustoria (HA) formed in a host plant cell (PC). D. Basidiospores. E. Germination of basidiospores on PDA. F. Hyphae produced from mass of basidiospores on PDA. Scale bars: A, C, F = 10 μm, B, E, D = 5 μm. - + FIGURE 3. A, B. diff --git a/data/26/3C/D5/263CD56EFFEB3D26CAC131BCEC22FE1C.xml b/data/26/3C/D5/263CD56EFFEB3D26CAC131BCEC22FE1C.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..15c7c8205da --- /dev/null +++ b/data/26/3C/D5/263CD56EFFEB3D26CAC131BCEC22FE1C.xml @@ -0,0 +1,779 @@ + + + +A new species of Linum (Linaceae) from Iran with a focus on description of Linum turcomanicum in view of morphological and molecular analyses + + + +Author + +Behroozian, Maryam +Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran + + + +Author + +Vaezi, Jamil +Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran + + + +Author + +Joharchi, Mohammad Reza +Department of Botany, Research Centre for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran + + + +Author + +Memariani, Farshid +Department of Botany, Research Centre for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2017 + +2017-03-21 + + +299 + + +2 + + +151 +168 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.299.2.1 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.299.2.1 +1179-3163 +13688990 + + + + + + + +Linum khorassanicum +Joharchi & Behroozian + +, + +sp. nov +. + +( + +Fig. 4 +) + + + + + +Type: +— + +IRAN +. +North +Khorassan +: +W +Bojnurd +, +Ghorkhod Protected Area +, +7 km +west of +Zard +towards +Kastan +, + +1510 m + +, +N 37º 30 56.5˝, +E 56º 29 02.0˝, + +23 May 2013 + +, +Joharchi +, +Memariani +& +Behroozian +45035 ( +Holotype +: +FUMH +, +Isotype +: +TARI +) + +; + +Paratypes +: +ibid. +45036, 45037 ( +FUMH +) + +. + + +Perennial. Roots thick and robust, becoming woody. Flower-bearing stems few, +22–35 cm +high, erect, otherwise nearly prostrate or decumbent at base, thick, rigid, cylindrical, pale green; sterile stems with short, many and nearby imbricate leaves, unbranched or branched at apex. Leaves 3–12 × 0.7–1.5(2) mm, erect, linear, nerveless or 1-nerved, usually involute at margins, acute, green. Inflorescence 1–3-flowered; pedicels erect, straight, thick, short in flowering, +9–20 mm +long in fruiting. Flowers +36–48 mm +in diameter. Sepals rather large, three outer sepals 6.5–8 × +3–5 mm +, ovate, acute to round at apex, narrowly white- membranous at margin, two inner sepals broadly ovate, rounded at apex, broadly white-membranous at margin, +0.9–1.5 mm +wide, 3–5-nerved, hardly protruding below, median nerve extended to apex, pale green. Petals 18–24 × +12–15 mm +, broadly obovate, rounded at apex, blue, gradually tapering below to yellowish claw. Stamens only in long-styled forms, +7.5–8 mm +long; anthers +3–3.2 mm +long. Styles filiform. Stigma capitate. Capsules 10–11 × +9 mm +, broadly ovoid, tapering at apex and acuminate, becoming cream-brown; septa ciliate. Seeds 5–5.5 × +2.5–2.7 mm +, flattened, obliquely ovate- elliptic, shiny brown. May–July. + + + +FIGURE 4. +Holotype of + +Linum khorassanicum + +sp. nov. +(Joharchi, Memariani & Behroozian 45035 (FUMH)). + + + +Additional specimens examined: +— +IRAN +. +W +Bojnurd, Ghorkhod Protected Area, +2 km +on the bifurcation road towards Ternuli valley, on the hills of silviculture plan, +1540-1600 m +, +N 37º 23 28.1˝, +E 56º 26 27.4˝, +18 May 2010 +, + + +Memariani & Arjmandi 43677b +( +FUMH +); +W +Bojnurd, Ghorkhod Protected Area, northern slopes of Ghorkhod Mt., +2000-2700 m +, +18 July 2003 +, +Assadi & Hamdi 85589 +( +TARI +); +W +Bojnurd, Ghorkhod Protected Area, Ghorkhod Mt., +1600 m +, +17 July 2003 +, +Assadi & Hamdi 85489 +( +TARI +); Northeastern part of +Golestan +National Park, +ca. +7 km +west of Soolgerd, in open + +Juniperus + +wooldland and + +Artemisia + +steppe, +1300- 1600 m +, +N 37º 27’ +, +E 56º 4’ +, +28 April 1995 +, +Akhani 10541 +(Hb. Akhani); Northern part of +Golestan +National Park, near Koilar, on gypsum marl, +1131 m +, +N +37˚ 31’ 14”, +E +55˚ 58’ 47”, +23 June 2003 +, +Akhani 16864 +(Hb. Akhani). For the other specimens refer to table 1. + + + + +Etymology: +—The specific epithet refers to the distribution range of the new species in North +Khorassan province +in the northeast of +Iran +. + + + + +Distribution, habitats and conservation: +—So far, + +L. khorassanicum + +has been found in the middle mountain steppes of Aladagh range, Ghorkhod Mount and adjacent north-eastern parts of +Golestan +National Park in North +Khorassan Province +( +Fig. 1 +). It usually grows on north, northwest and west facing slopes, between +1100–2500 m +a.s.l. +Based on a phytosociological relevé in the +type +locality in Mt. Ghorkhod and observations of the habitats in northern slopes of Aladagh range, the new species grows in grassy mountain steppes dominated by + +Festuca valesiaca +Schleicher ex +Gaudin (1811: 242) + +community with a dense vegetation coverage of nearly up to 100%. The habitats are usually very rich in annuals and herbal perennials with scattered woody species ( +Table 4 +). The specimens 10541 (Hb. Akhani) and 43877 (FUMH) recorded as + +Linum austriacum + +in previous publications (Akhani 1998 and +Memariani 2016c +, respectively) belong to the new species + +L. khorassanicum + +. Akhani (1998) referred to the necessity of further studies on the specimen from +Golestan +National Park named as + +L. austriacum + +because of some morphological differences in the easternmost populations of the recorded species. + + + +TABLE 4. +Species associated with + +Linum khorassanicum + +, based on a 225 m +2 +(15 m ×15 m) relevé in the type locality: date: + + + +23V2013 +, elevation: +1510 m +, gradient: 10–15°, aspect: N-NE, total cover: 90%. Cover-abundance scales are based on BraunBlanquet (1964). + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+Species + +Cover- abundance + +Species + +Coverabundance +
+ +Festuca valesiaca +Schleich. ex Gaudin + +4 + +Allium rubellum +M.Bieb. + ++
+ +Cousinia decipiens +Boiss. &Buhse + +2 + +Asperula arvensis + +L. ++
+ + +Linum khorassanicum + +sp. nova + +1 + +Bongardia chrysogonum + +(L.) Spach ++
+ +Asperula glomerata +(M.Bieb.) Griseb. + +1 + +Bromus danthoniae +Trin. + ++
+ +Astragalus jolderensis +Fedtsch. + +1 + +Erysimum ischnostylum +Freyn & Sint. + ++
+ +Astragalus khoshjailensis +Sirj. & Rech.f. + +1 + +Fumana procumbens +(Dun.) Gren. & Gordon + ++
+ +Berberis integerrima +Bunge + +1 + +Iris fosteriana +Aitch. & Baker + ++
+ +Bromus kopetdagensis +Drobov + +1 + +Lappula microcarpa +(Ledeb.) Guerke + ++
+ +Cerasus pseudoprostrata +Pojark. + +1 + +Leopoldia caucasica +(Griseb.) Losinsk. + ++
+ +Convolvulus calvertii +Boiss. + +1 + +Marrubium parvifolorum +Fisch. & C.A.Mey. + ++
+ +Crucianella sintenisii +Bornm. + +1 + +Muscari neglectum +Guss. + ++
+ +Dactylis glomerata + +L. +1 + +Plantago lanceolata + +L. ++
+ +Echinops ritrodes +Bunge + +1 + +Prangos latiloba +Korov. + ++
+ +Galium verum + +L. +1 + +Ranunculus oxyspermus +Willd. + ++
+ +Hypericum scabrum + +L. +1 + +Scorzonera leptophylla +(DC.) Krasch. & Lipsch. + ++
+ +Onobrychis cornuta + +(L.) Desv. +1 + +Scorzonera mucida +Rech.f. + ++
+ +Onosma dichroanthum +Boiss. + +1 + +Turgenia latifolia + +(L.) Huffm. ++
+ +Onosma longilobum +Bunge + +1 + +Valerianella oxyrrhynca +Fisch. & C.A.Mey. + ++
+ +Poa bulbosa + +L. +1 + +Ziziphora tenuior + +L. ++
+ +Rhamnus pallasii +Fisch. & C.A.Mey. + +1 + +Helianthemum ledifolium + +(L.) Miller +r
+ +Klasea latifolia +(Boiss.) L.Martins + +1 + +Helichrysum oocephalum +Boiss. + +r
+ +Stachys turcomanica +Trautv. + +1 + +Rumex tuberosus + +L. +r
+ +Stipa holosericea +Trin. + +1 + +Tulipa undulatifolia +Boiss. var. +micheliana +(Hoog) Wilford + +r
+ +Verbascum cheiranthifolium +Boiss. + +1 + +Tulipa montana +Lindl. + +r
+ +Ziziphora clinopodioides +Lam. + +1
+ + +Biogeographically, the new species is a narrow endemic element of western Khorassan-Kopet Dagh (KK). The Khorassan-Kopet Dagh floristic province is located in mountainous areas of northeastern +Iran +and partly in southern +Turkmenistan +. The area is a transition zone and a corridor connecting different phytogeographical units of the Irano-Turanian region with a high rate of 14% endemism in its total flora ( + +Memariani +et al. +2016a + +, +2016b +). According to IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria ( +IUCN, 2011 +), + +L. khorassanicum + +is here assessed as Endangered (EN, B1+2ac (i,iii)). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is about +400 km +2 +with few and severely fragmented locations. The habitats in Aladagh range are not officially protected and the main localities in Ghorkhod Protected Area, including the +type +locality, are situated in poorly protected parts of the northern borders of the area recently damaged by extending the agricultural fields and road construction ( + +Memariani +et al. +2016c + +). The new species is therefore considered to be facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild and needs very urgent +in situ +and +ex situ +conservation efforts. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/26/3C/D5/263CD56EFFEC3D26CAC13666ECA3F7E8.xml b/data/26/3C/D5/263CD56EFFEC3D26CAC13666ECA3F7E8.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3f473cd88c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/26/3C/D5/263CD56EFFEC3D26CAC13666ECA3F7E8.xml @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ + + + +A new species of Linum (Linaceae) from Iran with a focus on description of Linum turcomanicum in view of morphological and molecular analyses + + + +Author + +Behroozian, Maryam +Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran + + + +Author + +Vaezi, Jamil +Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran + + + +Author + +Joharchi, Mohammad Reza +Department of Botany, Research Centre for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran + + + +Author + +Memariani, Farshid +Department of Botany, Research Centre for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2017 + +2017-03-21 + + +299 + + +2 + + +151 +168 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.299.2.1 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.299.2.1 +1179-3163 +13688990 + + + + + + + + +Linum turcomanicum +Juzepczuk + +in + +Shishkin (1949: 720) + + +( +Fig. 5 +). + + + + + + + +Type +: + +— +TURKMENISTAN +. Massinev Mount, Androssov +s.n. + + +Perennial. Stems +20–67 cm +high, ± numerous, ascendens, in the upper half to the fourth branching, sterile stems many, rather densely leafy, with erect or spreading linear leaves. Leaves of flower-bearing shoots +5–25 mm +long, +0.6–3 mm +wide, spreading to erect, linear-lanceolate to lanceolate, margins slightly thin-denticulate and scabrous, rarely flat, involute, green or glaucescent in dry, lower leaves acute, rarely acuminate, upper leaves long-acuminate, 1–3-nerved. Inflorescence composed of rather few or many-flowered cymes; pedicels erect, short in flowering, long in fruiting, +10–25 mm +, thin, straight or hardly recurved in fruit. Flowers +26–45 mm +in diameter. Sepals glaucescent or pale green, darker in bud, the outer ones +4–6 mm +long and +1.5–2.5 mm +wide, ovate-elliptic, obtuse or acuminate, with narrow white-membranous margin, inner sepals +4.5–6.5 mm +long and +3–4 mm +wide, broadly ovate, rounded at apex, broadly white-membranous at margin, shortly mucronulate, dorsally with 3–5 prominent nerves below. Petals +13–22 mm +long, +6–13 mm +wide, obovate or broadly obovate, almost three times as long as sepals, cuneately tapering at base, obtuse or orbicular above, blue to pale blue, sometimes whitish blue, with yellowish claw, overlapping at margins. Stamens in long-styled forms (as styles in short-styled forms) +3–4.5 mm +long, stamens in short-styled forms (as style in long-styled forms) +6.5–8 mm +long, styles 4–5 or +6–7 mm +long, respectively; anthers +1.2–2 mm +long and +0.5–0.7 mm +wide. Stigma capitate. Capsules +5.5–7.5 mm +long and +5.5–7 mm +wide, usually broadly ovoid, shortly mucronate at apex; yellow-straw, septa ciliate. Seeds +5–6 mm +long and +2–2.5 mm +wide, obliquely oblong-ovate, flattened, dark brown, shiny. + + +Specimens examined: +— +IRAN +. +NE +Bojnurd, +21 km +on road towards Gifan, +1000 m +, +N 35° 54’ 35” +, +E 57° 22’ 37.07” +, +Assadi & Maassuumi 50211 +( +TARI +). For the other specimens refer to table 1. + + + + +Distribution, habitats and conservation: +— + +Linum turcomanicum + +was hitherto known from the +type +locality in Misinov (Massinev) Mount in +Turkmenistan +near the Iranian borders. So, this species is recorded here 69 years after its description from the +type +location in +Turkmenistan +. The +type +specimen is in early flowering stage; therefore, the original description of the species is partly incomplete and ambiguous especially in morphological characters of the fruits. The revision of the + +Linum + +specimens in FUMH revealed that this species is an endemic plant widely distributed throughout Khorassan-Kopet Dagh floristic province in northeastern +Iran +and southern +Turkmenistan +( +Fig. 1 +). In this work, after a comprehensive taxon sampling from the entire species range in northeast of +Iran +, the taxonomic description of + +L. turcomanicum + +was completed. Specimens collected near the +type +locality (45730-37 FUMH) grow in understory of + +Acer monspessulanum +Linnaeus (1753: 105) + +shrubs in higher mountain slopes of Misinov Mt. However, the other populations, usually with few individuals, occur in a wide range of habitats and vegetation +types +from the moist mountain steppes in western parts of its distribution range (in North +Khorassan province +) to the dry gypsum and marl hills in the east (in Razavi +Khorassan province +). + + + +L. turcomanicum + +was previously known as a Central Khorassan- Kopet Dagh (KK) endemic and evaluated as DD (Data Deficient) threat category ( + +Memariani +et al. +2016b + +). However, according to the discovery of relatively wide distribution range throughout KK (omni-KK), the species is re-evaluated here as a non-threatened plant. The maximum distance between any pair of distribution point is +420 km +and the calculated EOO is +38106 km +2 +. Based on IUCN criteria and categories, it is evaluated as NT (Near Threatened) and it is likely to be qualified for a threatened category in the near future.A reduction analysis by GeoCAT showed that the loss of the south-easternmost populations in Torbat-e Jam (34158 FUMH; +Fig. 1 +) can reduce the EOO down to +19474 km +2 +(49% reduction) and re-evaluate the threat status up to VU (Vulnerable). Therefore, conservation of the satellite populations of the species is of great importance to ensure protection of the genetic diversity across its distribution range with relative diverse habitats. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/A5/73/C1/A573C14AFF9668004297F86655932E10.xml b/data/A5/73/C1/A573C14AFF9668004297F86655932E10.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6bdcce54e5d --- /dev/null +++ b/data/A5/73/C1/A573C14AFF9668004297F86655932E10.xml @@ -0,0 +1,285 @@ + + + +Lectotypification of the Linnaean name Centaurea montana (Compositae, Cardueae- Centaureinae) + + + +Author + +Altinordu, Fahim + + + +Author + +Susanna, Alfonso +Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB-CSIC-ICUB), Passeig del Migdia, s. n., Parc de Montjuïc, 08038 Barcelona, Spain + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2017 + +2017-03-17 + + +299 + + +1 + + +143 +146 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.299.1.16 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.299.1.16 +1179-3163 +13689046 + + + + + + + + +Centaurea montana +Linnaeus (1753: 911) + + +. + + + + + + +Type +: +— +Herb. Burser XV: 29 ( +UPS +[digital image!], +lectotype +designated here) ( +Fig. 1 +). + + + +FIGURE 1. +Lectotype of + +Centaurea montana + +L. [Herb. Burser XV: 29, UPS-BURSER]. Reproduced with permission. + + + +The protologue of + +Centaurea montana +( +Linnaeus 1753: 911 +) + +consists of a diagnosis “ + +CENTAUREA calycibus serratis +, foliis lanceolatis decurrentibus, caule simplicissimo + +”, with citations from earlier works ( +Linnaeus 1738: 422 +, +Linnaeus 1748: 270 +, +Royen 1740: 138 +) followed by four synonyms: “ + +Cyanus montanus latifolius +s[eu]. +Verbasculum cyanoides + +” from +Bauhin (1623: 273) +; “ + +Cyanus montanus +, caule folioso, capitulo oblongo + +” from +Boccone (1697: 20 +, t. 2); “ + +Cyanus major + +” from +L’Obel (1591: 548) +, and “β + +Jacea integrifolia humilis + +” from +Bauhin (1620: 127 +; +1623: 271 +). The fourth synonym in this list is accompanied with a reference to “Burs. XV. 29”, which is the citation of a specimen in UPS-BURSER (Herb. Burser XV: 29); this specimen is therefore a +syntype +. Two of the synonyms refer to illustrated treatments ( +L’Obel 1591 +, +Boccone 1697 +); these illustrations are also original material for the name + +C +. +montana + +because they were presumably used in preparation of the validating diagnosis of the name. + + +Among the original elements cited by +Jarvis (2007) +, six herbarium sheets and two illustrations were examined. + + +(1) In the Burser Herbarium at +UPS +there are two sheets (Herb. Burser XV[2]: 29 and XV[2]: 56) bearing the original annotations “ + +Jacea integrifolia humilis +Bauh. + +/ +Prope oppidum Melck Austriae +” and “ + +Cyanus montanus latifolius +: vel + + +Verbasculum Cyanoides Bauh +. + +/ + +Cyanus major Lob +. + +grosse Kornblumen./ + +In Helvetia et +Austria +superiore sponte + +”, which match the Linnaean synonym from +Bauhin (1620 +, +1623 +). The +syntype +in UPS-BURSER (Herb. Burser XV[2]. 29) bears two fragments with both leaves and inflorescences. + + +(2) In the Royen Herbarium at +L +there is a good herbarium specimen (No. 900.193-77) linked to the synonym of Linnaeus “ +Roy. lugdb. 138 +”. This specimen is original material because Linnaeus studied Royen’s herbarium during his stay in Leyden, before his return to +Sweden +in 1738 (see +Jarvis 2007: 153 +). + + +(3) In the Linnaean Herbarium at +LINN +, there is a herbarium sheet: Herb. Linn. No. 1030.15 ( +LINN +; image available at: http://linnean-online.org/10620/). This specimen includes a fragment with leaves and two inflorescences, and the original Linnaeus’s annotation “11 + +montana + +”, explicitly referring to the number of the species account of + +Centaurea montana + +in the +Species Plantarum +( +Linnaeus 1753: 911 +). + + +(4) In the Clifford Herbarium at +BM +there are two sheets of original material (No. 422, + +Centaurea + +19— +BM +000647269 and +BM +000647270; images available respectively at: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/resources/research-curation/projects/ clifford- herbarium/lgimages/ +BM +000647269.JPG and http://www.nhm.ac.uk/resources/research-curation/projects/cliffordherbarium/lgimages/ +BM +000647270.JPG), each bearing a fragment, and containing both leaves and inflorescences that match the protologue. + + +(5) +L’Obel (1591: 548) +and +Boccone (1697: 20 +, t. 2) provided illustrations (available respectively at http://bibdigital.rjb. csic.es/ing/Libro.php?Libro=4360& +Pagina +=556, and http://bibdigital.rjb.csic.es/ing/Libro.php?Libro=1490& +Pagina +=211) matching Linnaeus’s diagnosis. These illustrations are cited in the protologue and probably used by Linnaeus in preparation of his validating description, and thus they may be used for lectotypification. + +We have been unable to trace any further original material in any of the other Linnaean and Linnaean-linked herbaria. + +We confirm that all the elements listed above are correctly identified as + +C. montana + +. Of these original elements, we designate Burser’s specimen in UPS-BURSER (Herb. Burser XV: 29) as the +lectotype +of + +C. montana + +since the specimen it is a +syntype +and therefore has precedence in +lectotype +designation over uncited specimens and cited or uncited illustrations (Art. 9.12 of the +Melbourne Code +, + +McNeill +et al. +2012 + +). It is therefore the obligate +lectotype +for the name + +Centaurea montana + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/A5/73/C1/A573C14AFF9668024297F9925496285A.xml b/data/A5/73/C1/A573C14AFF9668024297F9925496285A.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a56baa1c002 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/A5/73/C1/A573C14AFF9668024297F9925496285A.xml @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ + + + +Lectotypification of the Linnaean name Centaurea montana (Compositae, Cardueae- Centaureinae) + + + +Author + +Altinordu, Fahim + + + +Author + +Susanna, Alfonso +Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB-CSIC-ICUB), Passeig del Migdia, s. n., Parc de Montjuïc, 08038 Barcelona, Spain + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2017 + +2017-03-17 + + +299 + + +1 + + +143 +146 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.299.1.16 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.299.1.16 +1179-3163 +13689046 + + + + + + +Centaurea +sect. +Cyanus +subsect. +Perennes +N. Garcia & Susanna + +, + +subsect. nov. + + + + + + +Diagnosis: very similar to + +Centaurea +sect. +Cyanus +subsect. +Cyanus + +, but plants perennial (annuals in +C. +subsect. + +Cyanus + +) with basic chromosome number always +x += 11 ( +x += 8, 10 or +12 in +C. +subsect. + +Cyanus + +) and pollen +type + +Centaurea montana + +(pollen +type + +Centaurea cyanus + +in +C. +subsect. + +Cyanus + +; cf. +Wagenitz 1955: 236–238 +). + + +Type +species: + +Centaurea montana + +L. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/C7/74/08/C774087E137FFF9CFF7DFA92FE8CFEEC.xml b/data/C7/74/08/C774087E137FFF9CFF7DFA92FE8CFEEC.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f0343066cbc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/C7/74/08/C774087E137FFF9CFF7DFA92FE8CFEEC.xml @@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ + + + +Rediscovery of Arisaema translucens (Araceae) and notes on A. tuberculatum, two strict endemics of Nilgiris, India + + + +Author + +Prabhukumar, Konickal Mambetta +Plant Systematics and Genetic Resources Division, Centre for Medicinal Plants Research, Arya Vaidya Sala, Kottakkal, Kerala, India. + + + +Author + +Chhabra, Tarun +Edhkwehlynawd Botanical Refuge (EBR), C / o Dental Clinic, Hospital Road, Ootacamund- 643001, Nilgiris, India. + + + +Author + +Robi, Aloor Jose +Department of Botany, Bishop Abraham Memorial College, Thuruthicad, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, India. + + + +Author + +Jagadeesan, Raveendran +Plant Systematics and Genetic Resources Division, Centre for Medicinal Plants Research, Arya Vaidya Sala, Kottakkal, Kerala, India. + + + +Author + +Balachandran, Chandrasseril Narayanan Sunil And Indira + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2017 + +2017-05-05 + + +306 + + +1 + + +85 +90 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.306.1.7 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.306.1.7 +1179-3163 + + + + + + + + +Arisaema translucens +Fischer (1933: 344) + + +. + + + + + + +Type +:— +INDIA +. +Tamil Nadu +: Nilgiris district, Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve,Carrington Tea Estate, near Thia Shola, +6000 ft. +, 1932, + +Barnes +AR +.4 + +( +K +!). +Figs. 1 +, +2 +. + + +Dioecious, perennial herbs. Pseudostem up to +30 cm +long. Underground stem a subglobose tuber, 2–2.5 × +3–4 cm +across, white–pale yellow. Roots pale purple. Cataphylls 3; inner +8.5–10 cm +long, apex obtuse, pale purple; outer +4–5 cm +long, apex obtuse. Leaf solitary, radiate; petiole +20–30 cm +long, pale purple mottled with brown and white; leaflets 9–11, lanceolate to oblong–oblanceolate; lamina 8–15 × +2–3.5 cm +, base attenuate, apex acuminate, margin entire– revolute, glabrous, pale green above, glossy below. Inflorescence dioecious, reaching to halfway length of the stem; peduncle 12–14 × +0.2–0.8 cm +, broader distally, light yellow-pink; spathe +7.5–9 cm +long including limb; tube cylindric, 3–3.2 × +1.2–1.5 cm +, cucullate at mouth, striped c. 30 longitudinal lines; mouth obcordate–obovate; apex caudate with filiform tail, tail up to +2.5 cm +long, deflexed. Male spadix sessile, +4.5 cm +long; fertile region stout, c. 1.9 × +0.3–0.4 cm +, narrower towards the distal; appendix sessile, c. 2.5 × +0.2–0.3 cm +, tapered to the tip, pale purple. Male flowers clearly stipitate; stipe +1–1.5 mm +long; anthers 2–6, 0.5–0.7 × +0.6–0.8 mm +, reniform, purple, lax, dehiscence through apical slits. Female spadix sessile, cylindrical; spadix is longer than the tube; appendix up to +5 cm +long, stipitate, green-light purple streaked, cylindrical at the base, tapering towards the tip, apical part white; neuters c. +5 mm +, above the fertile zone, directed upwards. Fruit not seen. + + +Phenology:— +The flowering occurred during April–June. + + + + +Distribution:— +Endemic to the +type +locality of Thia Shola, +Tamil Nadu +. + + +Specimens examined +: +— + +INDIA +. +Tamil Nadu +: +Nilgiris district +, +Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve +, +Thia Shola +, +Carrington Tea Estate +, ± + +2050 m + +. alt. + +03 June 2016 + +, + +Prabhukumar +, +Tarun Chhabra +, +Sunil +& +Binu Prakash + +9167 ( +CMPR +!) + +; + + +16 July 2016 + +, + +Prabhukumar +, +Tarun Chhabra +& +Binu Prakash + +9312 ( +CMPR +!) + +; + +Tamil Nadu +, +Nilgiris district +, +Thia Shola +, +Carrington Tea Estate +, + +6000 ft + +, + +16 June 1932 + +, + +Barnes +s.n + +, +Barcode +no. +K000499312 +, +K000499313 +, +K000499314 +, +K000499315 +( +K +!) + +. + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/CC/75/ED/CC75ED0BB51DFFF4FF36FA4BFA9EFEEA.xml b/data/CC/75/ED/CC75ED0BB51DFFF4FF36FA4BFA9EFEEA.xml new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fa5c0714e61 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/CC/75/ED/CC75ED0BB51DFFF4FF36FA4BFA9EFEEA.xml @@ -0,0 +1,340 @@ + + + +Typification of the name Rubus styriacus (Rosaceae) + + + +Author + +Király, Gergely + +text + + +Phytotaxa + + +2017 + +2017-03-17 + + +299 + + +1 + + +147 +150 + + + + +http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.299.1.17 + +journal article +10.11646/phytotaxa.299.1.17 +1179-3163 +13689064 + + + + + + + + +Rubus styriacus +Halácsy (1890: 432) + + +. +Type +:— +AUSTRIA +, +Styria +, “In Bergwäldern bei Mariagrün, nächst Graz—430 + + + + + +m”, + +2 September 1882 + +, + +E +. Preissmann + +( +WU +!, +lectotype +, designated here; +Figure 1 +) + +. + + + + + += + + +Rubus styriacus + +var. +subcanescens +Halácsy (1890: 433) + + + +. Type:— +AUSTRIA +, +Styria +, “Lichte Waldstellen zwischen Stiftingsthal und der Ries bei Graz— + +450 m + +”, + +19 July 1886 + +, +E. Preissmann +(WU!, +lectotype +, designated here; +Figure 2 +). + + + + + + +Other original material examined:— +AUSTRIA +, +Styria +“Wälder beim “Kalten Brunnen” nächst Graz— + +400 m + +” + +3 July 1885 + +, + +E +. Preissmann + +( +WU +!) + +; + +“ +Bergwälder am Ruckerlberge +bei Graz— + +420 m + +”, + +13 July 1885 + +, + +E +. Preissmann + +( +WU +!) + +; + +“Bergwälder ober dem Hilmteiche bei Graz— + +420 m + +”, + +12 July 1885 + +, + +E +. Preissmann + +( +WU +!) + +; + +“Lichte Waldstellen zwischen Stiftingsthal und der Ries bei Graz— + +450 m + +”, + +19 July 1886 + +, + +E +. Preissmann + +( +WU +!; 3 different specimens with the same locality and date) + + + +Notes +:—Halácsy described about 40 + +Rubus + +taxa on species rank, however, + +R. styriacus + +is the single name that is widely accepted and used by recent authors. + +R. styriacus + +is characterized by the purplish first year stem with 15–25 declining prickles per +5 cm +length of stem, and the stalked glands 3–10 per +1 cm +side of stem. Petioles usually 130–170% as long as the lower leaflets; terminal leaflets acuminate-ovate to triangular with a petiolule 33–55% as long as their lamina. Inflorescences fewflowered with patent branches, foliated nearly to the tip; inflorescence axis with 20–80 stalked glands and 10–30 prickles per +5 cm +of length. Petals pink, +8–11 mm +long ( +Maurer 1996 +, +Weber 1995 +, + +Király +et al. +2013 + +). The species occurs in +Austria +, +Hungary +and +Slovenia +( + +Kurtto +et al. +2010 + +); its distribution area ranges on the southeastern side of the Alps from +Carinthia +( +Austria +) on the western to the Bakony Mts ( +Hungary +) on the eastern edge, with outposts as south as Istria ( +Maurer & Drescher 2000 +, +Starmühler 2003 +, + +Király +et al. +2014 + +). + + + +FIGURE 1. + +Rubus styriacus +Halácsy + +(Lectotype, WU, “Halácsy collection”) + + + + +FIGURE 2. + +Rubus styriacus +var. +subcanescens +Halácsy + +(Lectotype, WU, “Halácsy collection”) + + + +It is worth noting that Halácsy mentioned also white petals in the diagnosis, which is in contradiction to the recent sense of the species—it has always pink petals. Nevertheless, the known original material consists solely specimens that fully correspond to the recently accepted (pink flowered) biotype. We do not know original specimen(s) from the Lower Austrian locality (Rams bei Kranichgraben) mentioned in the protologue, which is located (according to +Maurer & Drescher 2000 +) beyond the actually known boundary of the distribution area, and probably refers to the related, white flowering + +R. clusii +Borbás (1885: 401) + +. +Halácsy (1890) +emphasized that he compiled the description on the basis of specimens listed in the protologue. Therefore, +I +believe that either he only presumed the presence of white petals (the known original material consists one flowering specimen—collected on + +3 +rd +July 1885 + +–, which is characterized on the herbarium label as having pink petals; the other specimens collected later in the year are not flowering but fruiting); or the white flower color refers to the (missing) plant from +Lower Austria +(which, in this case, cannot be identical with + +R. styriacus + +in the recently accepted and also here typified sense). + + +Halácsy (1890) +distinguished + +R. styriacus +var. +subcanescens + +from the nominate species by having thin greyish felt on the younger leaves beneath. This feature is, indeed, often observable on leaves of + +R. styriacus + +exposed to the sun, and it has not any taxonomic value. The specimen in +WU +labelled by Halácsy as + +var. +subcanescens + +(and designated here as the +lectotype +for this name) has the same hair type on the leaves beneath as the other specimens of the original material, and it is in all reliable features identical with the nominate species; thus, it is regarded as its heterotypic synonym. + + + + \ No newline at end of file