diff --git a/data/0B/CC/9E/0BCC9EDA48DC0B20DD7F46022C7388A8.xml b/data/0B/CC/9E/0BCC9EDA48DC0B20DD7F46022C7388A8.xml index 48438284af1..2a14d253720 100644 --- a/data/0B/CC/9E/0BCC9EDA48DC0B20DD7F46022C7388A8.xml +++ b/data/0B/CC/9E/0BCC9EDA48DC0B20DD7F46022C7388A8.xml @@ -1,106 +1,106 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - -Lycocerus nigratus Y. Yang & X. Yang -nom. n. + + + +Lycocerus nigratus Y. Yang & X. Yang +nom. n. - - -Podabrinus nigricolor -Wittmer 1951 + + +Podabrinus nigricolor +Wittmer 1951 : 99. - -Pseudoabsidia nigricolor + +Pseudoabsidia nigricolor : -Wittmer 1969 +Wittmer 1969 : 128. - -Athemellus nigricolor + +Athemellus nigricolor : -Wittmer 1972b +Wittmer 1972b : 124. - -Lycocerus nigricolor + +Lycocerus nigricolor : -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 : 252. [Secondary homonym, preoccupied by -Lycocerus nigricolor +Lycocerus nigricolor (Pic, 1938).] - -Distribution. -China (Fujian). + +Distribution. +China (Fujian). - -Etymology. - + +Etymology. + The new specific name is derived from Latin word -"niger" +"niger" = black, a reference to its black body coloration, as the same meaning as its original name. - -Remarks. - + +Remarks. + This species was originally described in -Podabrinus +Podabrinus , its original name is a junior secondary homonym of -Lycocerus nigricolor +Lycocerus nigricolor (Pic, 1938) (originally in -Athemus +Athemus , located in Malaya), so it was replaced by -Lycocerus nigeratus +Lycocerus nigeratus nom. n. (ICZN, 4th, article 57.3.1). diff --git a/data/0B/D3/0E/0BD30E1FED1E31830768F0DBA0D96C21.xml b/data/0B/D3/0E/0BD30E1FED1E31830768F0DBA0D96C21.xml index 1bec907fc73..0a7a68735bb 100644 --- a/data/0B/D3/0E/0BD30E1FED1E31830768F0DBA0D96C21.xml +++ b/data/0B/D3/0E/0BD30E1FED1E31830768F0DBA0D96C21.xml @@ -1,92 +1,92 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Decapauropus undulatulus -sp. n. + + + +Decapauropus undulatulus +sp. n. Figs 46-52 - -Material. -Holotype ad. 9(♀), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-080. + +Material. +Holotype ad. 9(♀), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-080. - -Etymology. -From the Latin undulatus, wavy (referring to the distal margin of the 4th antennal segment). + +Etymology. +From the Latin undulatus, wavy (referring to the distal margin of the 4th antennal segment). - -Diagnosis. - + +Diagnosis. + Many species in the genus have linguiform anal plates with two appendages but none of them has the appendages placed in the middle of the tergal side as in -Decapauropus undulatus +Decapauropus undulatus sp. n. Moreover is this species well defined by the peculiar undulated distal margin of the 4th antennal segment and the wide collum appendages which are directed inward/anteriorly. At present its relationships are not possible to trace. - -Description. -Length. 0.52 mm. Head. Not available for study. - + +Description. +Length. 0.52 mm. Head. Not available for study. + Antennae (Fig. 46). Distal margin of segment 4 distinctly wavy, four setae; their relative lengths: p=10, -p' +p' =7, -p'' +p'' =3, r=4. Setae annulate, p and -p' +p' grow thicker outward, -p'' +p'' and r cylindrical. Tergal seta p 1.5 times as long as the length of tergal branch t. The latter fusiform, 1.3 times as long as its greatest diameter and 0.8 of the length of sternal branchs,that branch subcylindrical, 1.3 times as long as its greatest diameter; anterior truncation weak. Seta q cylindrical striate, inserted very near distal margin, as long as the length of s. Relative lengths of flagella (basal segments included) and basal segments: F1=100, bs1=7; F2=44, bs2=4; F3=88, bs3=7. F1 5.5 times as long as t, F2 and F3 4.6 and 5.1 times as long as s respectively. Distal calyces small, distal part of flagella axes inconsiderably widened below calyces. Globulus g proportionally large, pyriform, 1.4 times as long as wide, ≈9 bracts, capsule with flattened bottom; width of g 0.6 of the length of the greatest diameter of t. Antennae glabrous. - -Trunk + +Trunk (Figs 47, 48). Setae on collum segment simple cylindrical striate, only one pair could be proved (Fig. 47); sternite process small, indistinct; appendages large short cylindrical directed inward and anteriorly, caps low. Process and appendages glabrous. -Setae on tergites only partly available for study, those proved thin cylindrical. Tergite VI with 4+2 setae, submedian posterior ones (Fig. 48) 0.9 of interdistance. -Bothriotricha (Fig. 49). Relative lengths: T1=100, T2=98, T3=79, T4=104, T5=?; axes simple straight thin in T1, T2, T4 and T5, pubescence there faint on proximal halves, on distal halves of T1, T2 and T4 distinct, partly erect, probably branched most distally; axes of T3 (Fig. 49) somewhat thickened in proximal half, pubescence there oblique, on distal half as on other bothriotricha. -Legs (Figs 50, 51). Setae on coxa and trochanter (Fig. 50) of leg 9 furcate, branches cylindrical blunt striate, secondary branch shorter and thinner than primary branch. These setae more anteriorly with rudimentary secondary branches. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 51) tapering, 3.6 times as long as its greatest diameter; proximal seta very thin tapering pointed, distal seta cylindrical blunt striate, proximal seta 0.3 of the length of tarsus and 1.7 times as long as the length of distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. - -Pygidium +Setae on tergites only partly available for study, those proved thin cylindrical. Tergite VI with 4+2 setae, submedian posterior ones (Fig. 48) 0.9 of interdistance. +Bothriotricha (Fig. 49). Relative lengths: T1=100, T2=98, T3=79, T4=104, T5=?; axes simple straight thin in T1, T2, T4 and T5, pubescence there faint on proximal halves, on distal halves of T1, T2 and T4 distinct, partly erect, probably branched most distally; axes of T3 (Fig. 49) somewhat thickened in proximal half, pubescence there oblique, on distal half as on other bothriotricha. +Legs (Figs 50, 51). Setae on coxa and trochanter (Fig. 50) of leg 9 furcate, branches cylindrical blunt striate, secondary branch shorter and thinner than primary branch. These setae more anteriorly with rudimentary secondary branches. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 51) tapering, 3.6 times as long as its greatest diameter; proximal seta very thin tapering pointed, distal seta cylindrical blunt striate, proximal seta 0.3 of the length of tarsus and 1.7 times as long as the length of distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. + +Pygidium (Fig. 52). Tergum. Posterior margin with three posterior lobes, one each posterior of insertion point of st and one broader in between. Relative lengths of setae, a1 not proved, a2=10, a3=23, st=15; a2 cylindrical blunt glabrous, a3 tapering pointed, striate distally, both setae curved inward and diverging; st somewhat clavate striate, directed posteriorly and curved inward. Distance st-st 2.2 times as long as st. -Sternum. Posterior margin with low lobe inside each seta b1, straight in between. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a2=10): b1=37, b2=21, setae thin tapering, b1 striate, as long as interdistance, b2 almost as long as distance b1-b2. -Anal plate directed posteriorly, 1.2 times as long as wide, linguiform with convex lateral and posterior margins, thickened in most posterior part, two short appendages protruding from the middle of tergal side. - - +Sternum. Posterior margin with low lobe inside each seta b1, straight in between. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a2=10): b1=37, b2=21, setae thin tapering, b1 striate, as long as interdistance, b2 almost as long as distance b1-b2. +Anal plate directed posteriorly, 1.2 times as long as wide, linguiform with convex lateral and posterior margins, thickened in most posterior part, two short appendages protruding from the middle of tergal side. + + Figures 46-52. -Decapauropus undulatus +Decapauropus undulatus sp. n., holotype, ad. 9(♂) 46 right antenna, sternal view 47 collum segment, median and left part, sternal view 48 tergite VI, posterior part 49T3 50 seta on trochanter of leg 9 51 tarsus of leg 9 52 pygidium, posteromedian and left part, sternal view. Scale: a: Figs 49-51; b: 47, 48; c: Fig. 52, d: Fig. 46. diff --git a/data/11/2D/CB/112DCB66092DF187D0B46802A3D5592F.xml b/data/11/2D/CB/112DCB66092DF187D0B46802A3D5592F.xml index 9cef2b8f49d..74f753e4634 100644 --- a/data/11/2D/CB/112DCB66092DF187D0B46802A3D5592F.xml +++ b/data/11/2D/CB/112DCB66092DF187D0B46802A3D5592F.xml @@ -1,129 +1,129 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba fascicollis Blake, 1934 + + + +Stoiba fascicollis Blake, 1934 Figs 520-22 - - -Stoiba fascicollis -Blake 1934 + + +Stoiba fascicollis +Blake 1934 : 54 [original description including figure]; -Blackwelder 1946 +Blackwelder 1946 : 743 [checklist]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Borowiec 1999 +Borowiec 1999 : 130 [catalog]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 105 [checklist]; -Chaboo 2007 +Chaboo 2007 : 28 [figure I misnamed]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Type material. - + +Type material. + Holotype (Fig. 5) and paratype in USNM (Type No. 44326) -. +. - -Type locality. - + +Type locality. + Cuba: Prov. Sancti -Spiritus +Spiritus : Buenos Aires, Trinidad Mts. 2350−2800 ft. - -Specimens examined. - + +Specimens examined. + Cuba: Prov. Sancti -Spiritus +Spiritus : Buenos Aires, Trinidad Mts., May 4 1932, SC Bruner, A Ohro, EEA. de Cuba No. 9873, 2350−2800 ft. (USNM: -holotype +holotype , paratype, type No. 44326); 25 June 1940, Folk, ex F -Monros +Monros collection (USNM: 1). Buenos Aires, Trinidad Mts., May 8-14 1936, 2500-3500 ft. Darlington (MCZ: 1); Topes de Collantes, Sierra de Trinidad, June 11 1959, MW Sanderson C59-25 (INHS: 1). - -Diagnosis. - -Stoiba fascicollis + +Diagnosis. + +Stoiba fascicollis (Figs 20-22) is similar to -Stoiba marginata +Stoiba marginata but it differs by the black pronotal coloration surrounded by a brown margin, unicolored elytra, pronotal base as broad as elytral base, fully developed hind wing and proximal 1/3 of pro-femur and proximal half of meso- and meta-femur black. - -Description. -Adult (n=4) length 8.3-8.7 mm, width 7.5-7.6 mm. Body (Figs 20-22) oval; elytral base as broad as pronotal base in dorsal view; profile moderately convex, highest at anterior 1/3 of elytra. Antenna (Figs 22, 50) brown with antennomeres I and II reddish and polished. Mandible (Fig. 58) with 5 teeth, maxillary palpus (Fig. 60) and labial palpus (Fig. 62) compact. Pronotum (Fig. 20) hemispherical with anterior margin slightly emarginate; dorsal surface slightly convex, more coarsely punctate than elytra with black coloration in middle; margin area brown, shallowly and sparsely punctate. Scutellum shiny black. Elytra (Fig. 21) moderately convex, black with blue luster, finely and coarsely punctate; explanate margin broadest at middle, narrower posteriorly, not extending to terminal end. Hind wing fully developed. Pro-femur brown with proximal 1/3 black; meso- and meta-femur brown with proximal 1/2 black. Spermatheca (Fig. 74) falcate with 2 openings; receptacle 1/3 as long as pump; spermathecal duct long and coarsely coiled. - - + +Description. +Adult (n=4) length 8.3-8.7 mm, width 7.5-7.6 mm. Body (Figs 20-22) oval; elytral base as broad as pronotal base in dorsal view; profile moderately convex, highest at anterior 1/3 of elytra. Antenna (Figs 22, 50) brown with antennomeres I and II reddish and polished. Mandible (Fig. 58) with 5 teeth, maxillary palpus (Fig. 60) and labial palpus (Fig. 62) compact. Pronotum (Fig. 20) hemispherical with anterior margin slightly emarginate; dorsal surface slightly convex, more coarsely punctate than elytra with black coloration in middle; margin area brown, shallowly and sparsely punctate. Scutellum shiny black. Elytra (Fig. 21) moderately convex, black with blue luster, finely and coarsely punctate; explanate margin broadest at middle, narrower posteriorly, not extending to terminal end. Hind wing fully developed. Pro-femur brown with proximal 1/3 black; meso- and meta-femur brown with proximal 1/2 black. Spermatheca (Fig. 74) falcate with 2 openings; receptacle 1/3 as long as pump; spermathecal duct long and coarsely coiled. + + Figures 20-28. Habitus. 20-22 -Stoiba fascicollis +Stoiba fascicollis 20 dorsal view 21 lateral view 22 ventral view 23-25 -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis (Syntype) 23 dorsal view 24 lateral view 25 ventral view 26-28 -Stoiba fuscicornis +Stoiba fuscicornis 26 dorsal view 27 lateral view 28 ventral view. (scale bar = 1.0 mm) - -Distribution. - + +Distribution. + Cuba: Prov. Sancti -Spiritus +Spiritus . diff --git a/data/2B/0F/B2/2B0FB214049AE7243FB1E2F012F95A83.xml b/data/2B/0F/B2/2B0FB214049AE7243FB1E2F012F95A83.xml index 23d1525e4f8..74bcde67368 100644 --- a/data/2B/0F/B2/2B0FB214049AE7243FB1E2F012F95A83.xml +++ b/data/2B/0F/B2/2B0FB214049AE7243FB1E2F012F95A83.xml @@ -1,121 +1,121 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba fimbrialis (Suffrian, 1868) + + + +Stoiba fimbrialis (Suffrian, 1868) - - -Chelymorpha fimbrialis -Suffrian 1868 + + +Chelymorpha fimbrialis +Suffrian 1868 : 241 [original description]; -Gemminger and Harold 1876 +Gemminger and Harold 1876 : 3640 [catalog]; -Leng and Mutchler 1914 +Leng and Mutchler 1914 : 458 [list of the West Indies -Coleoptera +Coleoptera ]; -Spaeth 1914 +Spaeth 1914 : 58 [catalog]; -Blackwelder 1946 +Blackwelder 1946 : 745 [checklist]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 152 [checklist]. - -Stoiba fimbrialis + +Stoiba fimbrialis : -Borowiec 1999 +Borowiec 1999 : 130 [catalog]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 106 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Type material. -Unknown + +Type material. +Unknown - -Type locality. - -"Cuba" + +Type locality. + +"Cuba" - -Description - + +Description + (from original description by -Suffrian 1868 +Suffrian 1868 ). Adult length 5.7 mm, width 3.8 mm. Body oval, convex, blue. Head, antennae, pronotum, legs, elytral lateral margin dusky, densely and deeply punctured. The background color is deep blue; venter is black; head (except for black eyes), antennae, lateral margin of pronotum (moderately broad, curved upward) and legs (except for infuscate base) yellowish red; posterior edges of ventrites yellowish red and tan with posterior edge slightly raised. Antennae shorter and stockier than other Stoiba species, pronotum shiny, sparsely -punctate +punctate with medio-longitudinal depression. Scutellum short and broad, bluish black with brown center. Elytra densely and coarsely punctate, sieve-like (as surface of a thimble) with lateral margin extended beyond discal edge and having discontiguous wrinkles. Claws tanned, hook-shaped with strong basal teeth. - -Distribution. - -"Cuba" + +Distribution. + +"Cuba" - -Remark. - + +Remark. + According to the original description, the coloration and surface of -Stoiba fimbrialis +Stoiba fimbrialis is very similar to -Stoiba marginata +Stoiba marginata . However, the type specimen is missing and no figures of -Stoiba fimbrialis +Stoiba fimbrialis exist. It is possible that they are the same species. In this case, -Stoiba marginata +Stoiba marginata would be a junior synonym of -Stoiba fimbrialis +Stoiba fimbrialis . diff --git a/data/2C/E8/30/2CE83017D9C8ED37E677B79AAE6A04D2.xml b/data/2C/E8/30/2CE83017D9C8ED37E677B79AAE6A04D2.xml index ac398014ec3..ac212ee5fad 100644 --- a/data/2C/E8/30/2CE83017D9C8ED37E677B79AAE6A04D2.xml +++ b/data/2C/E8/30/2CE83017D9C8ED37E677B79AAE6A04D2.xml @@ -1,192 +1,192 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba flavicollis (Klug, 1829) + + + +Stoiba flavicollis (Klug, 1829) Figures 23-25 - - -Cassida flavicollis -Klug 1829 + + +Cassida flavicollis +Klug 1829 : 14 [original description as key couplet 204]. - -Chelymorpha flavicolli + +Chelymorpha flavicolli s: -Boheman 1854 +Boheman 1854 : 25 [description], -1856 +1856 : 75 [checklist], 1862: 199 [checklist]; -Suffrian 1868 +Suffrian 1868 : 238 [description]; -Gemminger and Harold 1876 +Gemminger and Harold 1876 : 3640 [catalog]; -Leng and Mutchler 1914 +Leng and Mutchler 1914 : 458 [list of the West Indies -Coleoptera +Coleoptera ]. - -Stoiba flavicollis + +Stoiba flavicollis : -Spaeth 1909 +Spaeth 1909 : 720 [catalog], -1914 +1914 : 51 [catalog]; -Blackwelder 1946 +Blackwelder 1946 : 743 [checklist]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Medvedev 1993 +Medvedev 1993 : 9 [checklist]; -Borowiec 1996 +Borowiec 1996 : 229 [faunistic record], -1999 +1999 : 130 [catalog], 2002: 116 [checklist]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 106 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Chelymorpha nigripennis + +Chelymorpha nigripennis : -Sturm 1826 +Sturm 1826 : 151 [nomen nudum]. - -Type material. - + +Type material. + Syntypes (6) (one pictured in Figs 23-25), each with label -"14169" +"14169" [ -Klug's +Klug's collection], each with red label added "SYNTYPE, -Cassida flavicollis +Cassida flavicollis Klug 1829, det. by C. Shin 2012", deposited in ZMHB. - -Type locality. - -"Cuba" + +Type locality. + +"Cuba" - -Specimens examined - + +Specimens examined + (with fully developed wings). Cuba: 14169 [ -Klug's +Klug's collection] (ZMHB: six syntypes); Isla de la Juventud: June 29 1921 (AMNH: 1); Prov. Ciego de -Avila +Avila : Jaronu Camaguey, Oct. 20 1934, LC Scamuzza, Bushes (USNM: 1); La Havana: ex K Kaab collection, 1916 (USNM: 3); ex FC Bowditch collection (MCZ: 5); Prov. Pinar del -Rio +Rio : Las Anima, S. 1500 ft. Sept. 3−5 1934, SC Bruner and AR Otero (USNM: 3); Rangel, 1935, Zayas-Garcia (UWCP: 4); Vinales, Sept. 16−22 1913 (AMNH: 1); Vinales, May 14 1913 (USNM: 1); Vinales, San Vincente, July (USNM: 1); Sierra de los Organos Vinales, 16 Jan. 1967 (UWCP: 1); Soroa, July 6−7 1974, Z and M Meszaros (UWCP: 1); Sierra Anafe, Nov. 20 1932 (MMUE: 1, USNM: 1); Sierra Anafe, July 23 1932 (MCZ: 2); Sierra Rangel, 500−1000 ft. Aug. 28−30 1927 (USNM: 1); Aspiro-Rangel, June 16 1959, NW Sanderson, C59−28 (INHS: 3); San Blas WM Mann, 1918 (USNM: 2); Sierra Rangel, 1500 ft. Aug. 29 1927 (USNM: 1); Santiago de Cuba: Gran Piedra, June 29 1955, Otero, AFA. (AMNH: 1); Loma del Gato, Sierra del Cobre, 2600−3325 ft. Sept. 24−30 1935, J - -Acuna + +Acuna , SC Bruner, LC Scaramuzza, EEA. Cuba Ento Na.10643 (USNM: 1); Bito de Cardero Turquino, June 1964, Zayas-Garcia (UWCP: 1); Loma de Gato Sierra Maestra, May 26−28 1959 (INHS: 1); Loma de Gato Sierra del Cobre, Sept. 24−30 1935 (USNM: 1); Pico Turquino, June 1936, Darlington (USNM: 3); Villa Clara: Piedra Gorda WM (USNM: 1); Gortham acc. 68498 (USNM: 1); ex Geittner collection (HNHM: 1); ex Em Friv collection (HNHM:1): no further data (BMNH: 4; MCZ: 1; FMNH: 1; MMUE: 5; MZH: 10; NHRS: 5; USNM: 1; ZNHB: 17); Mexico: Yucatan: GF Gaumer (SEMC: 3). - -Specimens examined - + +Specimens examined + (with brachypterous wings). Cuba: Prov. Sancti -Spiritus +Spiritus : Jarahueca Ote. July 14-18 1927, SC Bruner (USNM: 1); Santiago de Cuba: Gran Piedra 1100 m (HNHM: 1); Loma de Gato, Range, July 3-7 1936, 3000 ft. (MCZ: 4); Loma del Gato, Sierra del Cobre, 2600-3325 ft. Sept. 24-30 1935, ex F -Monros +Monros collection (USNM: 7); Pico Turquino, South side, 1000 ft. June 1936 (USNM: 1); Pico Turquino, South side, 30 May 1985 (UWCP: 1); Sierra Maestra, July 10-20 1922, 600-900 m, CH Ballou and SC Bruner (USNM: 1); Loma de Cala to Pico Palma Mocha, Sierra Maestra, 3600-3900 ft. May 16 1948, J Acuna (USNM: 1); Loma Cardero Pico Turquino, Aug. 1 1935, J Acuna Col. (USNM: 1); Pinares 1918 WM Mann (USNM: 1); no further data (MCZ: 2, MMUE: 2, ZMHB: 2); Mexico: Yucatan: GF Gaumer (SEMC: 1). - -Diagnosis. - -Stoiba flavicollis + +Diagnosis. + +Stoiba flavicollis is a widely distributed species with many morphological variations such as pronotal shape (trapezoidal, rarely hemispherical without angle at postero-lateral 1/3), elytra explanate margin (broadest between anterior 1/3 and middle), elytral color (brownish black to black, often with metallic luster), and hind wing (fully-developed or brachypterous). It is mainly distinguished from -Stoiba bruneri +Stoiba bruneri by pale antennomere XI, from -Stoiba clarildae +Stoiba clarildae by elytra shape and coloration with metallic luster, and from -Stoiba indivisa +Stoiba indivisa by distinct posterior half of elytra margin and black elytra with weak metallic luster. - -Description. - + +Description. + Adult (n=118) length 6.8−9.4 mm, width 5.6−7.5 mm. Body oval (Figs 23-25), slightly or distinctly discontinuous between pronotum and elytra in dorsal view (individual variation); profile moderately convex, highest between anterior 1/3 of elytra and middle. Antennae (Figs 23, 51) reaching elytral base, brown to pale brown; antennomeres I, III and XI same in length, 2.5 times long than II; V−XI pubescent with long setae on each antennomere apex. Mandible (Fig. 58) with 5 teeth. Maxilla (Fig. 60) compact; palpifer weakly sclerotized; palpomere I 0.5 times as long as palpifer with setae apically; II 1.5 times as long as palpifer with apical region setose; III 0.8 times as long as II, setose apically; palpomere IV 1.2 times as long as III, setose with sensilla structure on apex. Labium (Fig. 62) compact; prementum subquadrate with anterior edge notched; ligula half oval with long setae; labial palpus 3-segmented; palpomere I triangular with long setae; II 2 times as long as I with long setae sub-apically; III more sclerotized than I and II with short setae and sensilla structure on apex. Pronotum (Fig. 23) hemispherical with anterior margin linear or slightly emarginate; lateral margin rounded or slightly angled or slight expanded without angle; disc moderately distinct, slightly -convex +convex ; surface scale-like, smooth; lateral margin shallowly and sparsely punctate, or rarely smooth. Procoxal process (Figs 25, 64) black with hypomeron brown. Scutellum blackish brown to black. Elytra (Fig. 24) moderately convex, often bluish black to black, rarely brownish black, finely punctate; margin broadest between anterior 1/3 and middle, narrower posteriorly. Hind wing fully developed (Fig. 92) or brachypterous (Fig. 93). Legs (Fig. 25) brown except for coxae, trochanters, base of pro- and meso-femur and proximal 1/4 of meta-femur dark brown to black. Male genitalia (Figs 68-69) curved, laid laterally (deversement); aedeagal base piece rounded with membranous structure, terminal end pointed; tegmen Y-shaped; spicule V-shaped with jointed part slightly extended; ejaculatory duct loosened. Spermatheca (Fig. 75) falcate; receptacle round with 2 openings; pump area 4 times as long as receptacle. - -Distribution. - + +Distribution. + Cuba: Isla de la Juventud; Prov. Ciego de -Avila +Avila ;Pinar del -Rio +Rio ; Santiago de Cuba; Villa Clara; Mexico: Yucatan. - -Remarks. - -Stoiba flavicollis + +Remarks. + +Stoiba flavicollis is well distributed over a large area of Cuba. It is the only species with both fully developed and brachypterous wings (Figs 92-93) in our study. In the present study, we located four adult specimens collected by GF Gaumer (Dr. George Franklin Gaumer, American botanist, 1850-1929) in Yucatan, Mexico, deposited in the SEMC, and identified as -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis . We confirmed this species identification; three of -Gaumer's +Gaumer's four specimens have fully developed wings and one is brachypterous. This finding represents the possible extension of a range for -Stoiba +Stoiba from the Caribbean islands to the Mexican mainland. However, there is no further known record of -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis from Yucatan or other Mexican regions. diff --git a/data/33/35/A1/3335A1F0D3C1A34415D5A9FC26074CCF.xml b/data/33/35/A1/3335A1F0D3C1A34415D5A9FC26074CCF.xml index 40691cfd023..a8ee877122e 100644 --- a/data/33/35/A1/3335A1F0D3C1A34415D5A9FC26074CCF.xml +++ b/data/33/35/A1/3335A1F0D3C1A34415D5A9FC26074CCF.xml @@ -1,198 +1,198 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - -Lycocerus aenescens (Fairmaire, 1889) + + + +Lycocerus aenescens (Fairmaire, 1889) Figs 5−6 - - -Podabrus aenescens -Fairmaire 1889 + + +Podabrus aenescens +Fairmaire 1889 : 40. - -Cantharis tcheonana -Pic 1922 + +Cantharis tcheonana +Pic 1922 : 31. - -Themus angusticollis -Pic 1955 + +Themus angusticollis +Pic 1955 : 16. [Secondary homonym, preoccupied by -Athemus angusticollis +Athemus angusticollis (Gorham, 1882), originally described in -Telephorus +Telephorus . Synonymized with -Athemus tcheonanus +Athemus tcheonanus (Pic, 1922) by -Wittmer 1995 +Wittmer 1995 : 211.] - -Athemus angustithorax -Wittmer 1975 + +Athemus angustithorax +Wittmer 1975 : 260. [Replacement name for -Themus angusticollis +Themus angusticollis Pic, 1955, nec Gorham 1882.] - -Athemus tcheonanus + +Athemus tcheonanus : -Wittmer 1975 +Wittmer 1975 : 260; -1995 +1995 : 211, figs. 42, 43, 168, 169. - -Athemus aenescens + +Athemus aenescens : -Wittmer 1982 +Wittmer 1982 : 341. - -Lycocerus aenescens + +Lycocerus aenescens : -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 : 249. - -Lycocerus tcheonanus + +Lycocerus tcheonanus : -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 : 254. syn. n. - -Type material examined. - -Podabrus aenescens + +Type material examined. + +Podabrus aenescens : Lectotype ♂ (MNHN): without locality information, [h]"Telephorus aenescens \ Frm., n. sp.", [h]"Athemus \ aenescens \ (Fairm.) \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"LECTOTYPUS" +"LECTOTYPUS" . Paralectotype: 1♀ (MNHN): [p] -"Kouy-Tcheu" +"Kouy-Tcheu" , [p] -"PARALECTOTYPUS" +"PARALECTOTYPUS" . - -Cantharis tcheonana + +Cantharis tcheonana : Holotype ♀ (MNHN): [p]"CHINE \ -Kouy-Tcheou +Kouy-Tcheou \ -Kouy +Kouy Yang -Fou" +Fou" , [h]"tcheonana \ n. sp.", [h]"Athemus \ tcheonanus \ (Pic) \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" . - -Themus angusticollis + +Themus angusticollis : Holotype ♂ (MNHN): [p]"Chasseurs Indigenes \ des Missionnaires \ de Ta-tslen-Lou \ 1906", [h]"Themus \ angusticollis \ n. sp.", [h]"Athemus s.str. \ angustithorax \ Wittm. \ det. W. Wittmer", [h]"Athemus s.str. \ tcheonanus \ (Pic) \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" . - -Additional material examined. - + +Additional material examined. + CHINA: Guangxi: 1♂, 1♀ (NHMB): "Koung-Si-Hien, alt. 2100m". Sichuan: 1♂ (NHMB): "Moxi, Gongashan mts., 1650m, 28. -VI- +VI- 2.VII.1994, leg. Bolm". Guizhou: 1♂ (MNHN): -"Kouy-Tcheu +"Kouy-Tcheu , -Kouy +Kouy Yang -Fou" +Fou" ; 2♀♀ (MNHN): -"Kouy-Tcheu" +"Kouy-Tcheu" ; 1♀ (MNHN): -"Kouei-Tcheou" +"Kouei-Tcheou" ; 5♀♀ (MNHN): "Kuoy-Tcheou, Gan chouem, Min y fou et Tchen-Fong, -Tcheou +Tcheou , 1918, P. Cavalerie"; 1♀ (MNHN): -"Kouy-Tcheu +"Kouy-Tcheu , 1921, Cavaleri"; 1♀ (MNHN): -"Kouy-Tcheu +"Kouy-Tcheu , Reg. De Pin-fa, 1908, -Pere +Pere Cavaleri". Yunnan: 1♂ (MNHN): "Tse Kou, 1895, R. P. Dubernard"; 1♂, 1♀ (IZAS): Dali, Cangshan, 30.V.1955, leg. Xing-Chi Yang; 8 spec. (NHMB): "Cangshan mts., E slope, 2000-2500m, -25°42'N +25°42'N , -100°08'E +100°08'E , 21.VI.1992, leg. Vit -Kubaň" +Kubaň" ; 12 spec. (NHMB): "Dali, 19.-21.V.1993, leg. R. Cervenka"; 2♂♂, 1♀ (NHMB): "Dali, 1600-2000m, 5.-8.VII.1990, leg. L. M. -Bocak" +Bocak" ; 1♂, 2♀♀ (NHMB): "Dali, 1.-7.VI.1994, B. -Siska +Siska et T. -Spevar" +Spevar" . - -Distribution. -China (Guangxi, Sichaun, Guizhou, Yunnan). + +Distribution. +China (Guangxi, Sichaun, Guizhou, Yunnan). - -Remarks. - + +Remarks. + Having examined the holotypes of -Lycocerus aenescens +Lycocerus aenescens (Fairmaire, 1889) and -Lycocerus tcheonanus +Lycocerus tcheonanus (Pic, 1922), we could not find any difference to justify their separation, so we synonymize -Lycocerus tcheonanus +Lycocerus tcheonanus under -Lycocerus aenescens +Lycocerus aenescens . diff --git a/data/44/4A/50/444A50D0D4CB8CEE4D6C8CE18BF4AE3E.xml b/data/44/4A/50/444A50D0D4CB8CEE4D6C8CE18BF4AE3E.xml index 6bae94f6c81..df134da9da2 100644 --- a/data/44/4A/50/444A50D0D4CB8CEE4D6C8CE18BF4AE3E.xml +++ b/data/44/4A/50/444A50D0D4CB8CEE4D6C8CE18BF4AE3E.xml @@ -1,130 +1,130 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - - -Lycocerus + + + + +Lycocerus inopaciceps (Pic, 1926) Figs 12-13 - - -Cantharis inopaciceps -Pic 1926b + + +Cantharis inopaciceps +Pic 1926b : 153. - -Themus inopaciceps + +Themus inopaciceps : -Wittmer 1961 +Wittmer 1961 : 362. - -Athemellus inopaciceps + +Athemellus inopaciceps : -Wittmer 1983a +Wittmer 1983a : 190. - -Athemus (Athemellus) bimaculicollis - -Svihla + +Athemus (Athemellus) bimaculicollis + +Svihla 2005 : 90, figs 38-41. syn. n. - -Lycocerus inopaciceps + +Lycocerus inopaciceps : -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 : 250. - -Type material examined. - -Cantharis inopaciceps + +Type material examined. + +Cantharis inopaciceps : Lectotype ♀ (MNHN): [p]"Szetschwan \ Kwanhsien \ Exp. -Stoezner" +Stoezner" , [h] -"Thibet" +"Thibet" , [h]"Cantharis \ inopaciceps \ n. sp.", [h] "Athemellus?", [p] -"LECTOTYPUS" +"LECTOTYPUS" . - -Athemus (Athemellus) bimaculicollis + +Athemus (Athemellus) bimaculicollis : Holotype ♂ (NMPC): [p]"CHINA-SHAANXI \ Lueyang \ 23.6−26.6.2004 \ leg. E. -Kucera" +Kucera" , [p]"HOLOTYPUS \ Athemus \ (Athemellus) \ bimaculicollis sp. nov.\ V. -Svihla +Svihla det. 2005". Paratype: 1♀ (NMPC): same data. - -Additional material examined. -CHINA: Shaanxi: 1♂, 1♀ (HBUM): Liuba, 10.−12.VI.2005, leg. Yi-Bin Ba; 1♂, 1♀ (HBUM): Liuba, Miaotaizi, 14.−15.VI.2005, leg. Yi-Bin Ba; 1♂, 4♀♀ (HBUM): Fengxian, Heigou, 13.VI.2005, leg. Yi-Bin Ba; 3♀♀ (HBUM): Liuba, Zaomulan, 11.VI.2005, leg. Yi-Bin Ba. + +Additional material examined. +CHINA: Shaanxi: 1♂, 1♀ (HBUM): Liuba, 10.−12.VI.2005, leg. Yi-Bin Ba; 1♂, 1♀ (HBUM): Liuba, Miaotaizi, 14.−15.VI.2005, leg. Yi-Bin Ba; 1♂, 4♀♀ (HBUM): Fengxian, Heigou, 13.VI.2005, leg. Yi-Bin Ba; 3♀♀ (HBUM): Liuba, Zaomulan, 11.VI.2005, leg. Yi-Bin Ba. - -Distribution. -China (Shaanxi, Sichuan). + +Distribution. +China (Shaanxi, Sichuan). - -Remarks. - -Athemus (Athemellus) bimaculicollis -Svihla + +Remarks. + +Athemus (Athemellus) bimaculicollis +Svihla , 2005, which was omitted in the catalogue by -Kazantsev and Brancucci (2007) +Kazantsev and Brancucci (2007) , is considered to be a junior synonym of -Lycocerus inopaciceps +Lycocerus inopaciceps (Pic, 1926), because we could not find any difference between their holotypes in the morphology including body size and coloration, tarsal claws and abdominal sternite VIII of female. diff --git a/data/46/6D/F3/466DF31384C62A6256A6479B2F003513.xml b/data/46/6D/F3/466DF31384C62A6256A6479B2F003513.xml index 60fd8fac957..e2744ddf049 100644 --- a/data/46/6D/F3/466DF31384C62A6256A6479B2F003513.xml +++ b/data/46/6D/F3/466DF31384C62A6256A6479B2F003513.xml @@ -1,86 +1,86 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Decapauropus brevilingulus -sp. n. + + + +Decapauropus brevilingulus +sp. n. Figs 20-27 - -Material. -Holotype ad. 9(♀), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, below the top, alt. 2400 m, 1991.vii.8, loc. CM-243. + +Material. +Holotype ad. 9(♀), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, below the top, alt. 2400 m, 1991.vii.8, loc. CM-243. - -Etymology. -From the Latin brevis, short, and lingua, tongue (referring to the shape of the anal plate). + +Etymology. +From the Latin brevis, short, and lingua, tongue (referring to the shape of the anal plate). - -Diagnosis. - -Decapauropus brevilingulus + +Diagnosis. + +Decapauropus brevilingulus sp. n. is well defined by its unique short linguiform anal plate in combination with a distinct semicircular lobe between the pygidial setae st and longish antennal globulus with ovoid capsule. At present its relationships can not be traced. - -Description. -Length. 0.55 mm. Head (Fig. 20). Setae on the tergal side thin annulate. Relative lengths of setae, 1st row: a1=10, a2=?; 2nd row: a1=10, a2=11, a3=14; 3rd row: a1=?, a2=10; 4th row: a1=9, a2=a4=11, a3=13; lateral group setae not studied. Ratio a1/a1-a1 in 1st row 1.4, 2nd row 0.5, 3rd row?, 4th row 1.3. Temporal organs small, ovoid in tergal view, length 0.6 of their shortest distance apart; small pore near posterior margin. Head cuticle glabrous. - + +Description. +Length. 0.55 mm. Head (Fig. 20). Setae on the tergal side thin annulate. Relative lengths of setae, 1st row: a1=10, a2=?; 2nd row: a1=10, a2=11, a3=14; 3rd row: a1=?, a2=10; 4th row: a1=9, a2=a4=11, a3=13; lateral group setae not studied. Ratio a1/a1-a1 in 1st row 1.4, 2nd row 0.5, 3rd row?, 4th row 1.3. Temporal organs small, ovoid in tergal view, length 0.6 of their shortest distance apart; small pore near posterior margin. Head cuticle glabrous. + Antennae (Fig. 21). Segment 4 with at least four setae, all thin cylindrical annulate blunt; their relative lengths: p=10, -p' +p' =7, -p'' +p'' =6, r=5. Tergal seta p 0.8 of the length of tergal branch t. The latter proportionally short, somewhat fusiform, twice longer than thick and 0.8 of the length of sternal branchs,that branch 1.9 times as long as its great -est +est diameter; anterodistal corner distinctly truncate. Seta q thin cylindrical annulate, ≈0.5 of the length of s. Relative lengths of flagella (basal segments included) and basal segments: F1=100, bs1=5; F2=38, bs2=6; F3=85, bs3=8. F1 5.5 times as long as t, F2 and F3 1.6 and 3.6 times as long as s respectively. Distal calyces somewhat flattened, distal part of flagella axes widened fusiformly below calyces. Globulus g longish, 1.5 times as long as greatest diameter, bracts and capsule proportionally long, 7 bracts; g as wide as the greatest diameter of t. Antennae glabrous. -Trunk. Setae of collum segment (Fig. 22) simple cylindrical blunt striate, sublateral and submedian setae of the same length; sternite process triangular, pointed anteriorly; appendages subspherical with flat caps. Process and appendages glabrous. - -Most +Trunk. Setae of collum segment (Fig. 22) simple cylindrical blunt striate, sublateral and submedian setae of the same length; sternite process triangular, pointed anteriorly; appendages subspherical with flat caps. Process and appendages glabrous. + +Most setae on tergites not available for study, those studied similar to those on head, 4+4 setae on tergite I, 4+2 on VI. -Bothriotricha. Most bothriotricha broken; T3 (Fig. 23) with proximal 2/3 somewhat thickened, pubescence distinct, oblique on thickened part, erect distally; T5 thin with very faint oblique pubescence. -Legs (Figs 24, 25). Setae on coxa (Fig. 24) and trochanter of all legs simple cylindrical striate. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 25) tapering, 4.8 times as long as its greatest diameter; setae thin, proximal one curved tapering pointed glabrous, distal one subcylindrical blunt striate, proximal seta 0.2 of the length of tarsus and 1.3 times as long as distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. -Pygidium (Figs 26, 27). Tergum. Posterior margin with large semicircular lobe between st. Setae a2 and a3 distinctly shorter than a1; relative lengths of setae: a1=10, a2=6, a3=7, st=3; a-setae directed posteriorly, proportionately long, tapering glabrous; a1 straight, a2 and a3 curved inward. Distance a1-a1 as long as a1, distance a1-a2 3.3 times as long as distance a2-a3; distance st-st 1.8 times as long as st and 0.8 of distance a1-a1. -Sternum. Posterior margin with shallow indentation between b1. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1=16, b2=7, setae thin tapering, b1 indistinctly striate in distal half, 1.2 times as long as interdistance, b2 as long as distance b1-b2. -Anal plate horizontal, narrowest anteriorly, somewhat broader than long, shortly linguiform, distal margin somewhat thickened at posterior margin; no appendages. - - +Bothriotricha. Most bothriotricha broken; T3 (Fig. 23) with proximal 2/3 somewhat thickened, pubescence distinct, oblique on thickened part, erect distally; T5 thin with very faint oblique pubescence. +Legs (Figs 24, 25). Setae on coxa (Fig. 24) and trochanter of all legs simple cylindrical striate. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 25) tapering, 4.8 times as long as its greatest diameter; setae thin, proximal one curved tapering pointed glabrous, distal one subcylindrical blunt striate, proximal seta 0.2 of the length of tarsus and 1.3 times as long as distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. +Pygidium (Figs 26, 27). Tergum. Posterior margin with large semicircular lobe between st. Setae a2 and a3 distinctly shorter than a1; relative lengths of setae: a1=10, a2=6, a3=7, st=3; a-setae directed posteriorly, proportionately long, tapering glabrous; a1 straight, a2 and a3 curved inward. Distance a1-a1 as long as a1, distance a1-a2 3.3 times as long as distance a2-a3; distance st-st 1.8 times as long as st and 0.8 of distance a1-a1. +Sternum. Posterior margin with shallow indentation between b1. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1=16, b2=7, setae thin tapering, b1 indistinctly striate in distal half, 1.2 times as long as interdistance, b2 as long as distance b1-b2. +Anal plate horizontal, narrowest anteriorly, somewhat broader than long, shortly linguiform, distal margin somewhat thickened at posterior margin; no appendages. + + Figures 20-27. -Decapauropus brevilingulus +Decapauropus brevilingulus sp. n., holotype, ad. 9(♂) 20 head, median and right part 21 left antenna, sternal view 22 collum segment, median and left part, sternal view 23T3 24 seta on coxa of leg 9 25 tarsus of leg 9 26 pygidium, posteromedian and left part, sternal view 27 anal plate, lateral view. Scale: a: Fig. 23; b: Fig. 20; c: 21, 22, 24, 25; d: 26, 27. diff --git a/data/51/D2/29/51D229AFA53EC02BFE9499DB7C315C16.xml b/data/51/D2/29/51D229AFA53EC02BFE9499DB7C315C16.xml index 5eb7f878921..94021b6ceac 100644 --- a/data/51/D2/29/51D229AFA53EC02BFE9499DB7C315C16.xml +++ b/data/51/D2/29/51D229AFA53EC02BFE9499DB7C315C16.xml @@ -1,52 +1,52 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Samarangopus poculifer Scheller, 1995 + + + +Samarangopus poculifer Scheller, 1995 - -Material. -Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1991.vi.30, 1 ad. 9(♀), ibidem, litter, 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-074, ibidem, litter, 1 ad. 9(♂), 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-080, ibidem, litter, 1 juv. 6, 30.vi.1991, CM-089; below the top, alt 2400, 1 ad. 9(♀), 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-202. - 4 specimens. + +Material. +Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1991.vi.30, 1 ad. 9(♀), ibidem, litter, 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-074, ibidem, litter, 1 ad. 9(♂), 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-080, ibidem, litter, 1 juv. 6, 30.vi.1991, CM-089; below the top, alt 2400, 1 ad. 9(♀), 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-202. - 4 specimens. - -General distribution. - + +General distribution. + Known from Doi Inthanon only ( -Scheller 1995 +Scheller 1995 ). diff --git a/data/5F/93/F7/5F93F7CF40F8D7304BC0652D7DEA59F3.xml b/data/5F/93/F7/5F93F7CF40F8D7304BC0652D7DEA59F3.xml index 1dbf5e4b444..46353e49024 100644 --- a/data/5F/93/F7/5F93F7CF40F8D7304BC0652D7DEA59F3.xml +++ b/data/5F/93/F7/5F93F7CF40F8D7304BC0652D7DEA59F3.xml @@ -1,128 +1,128 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba barroi Zayas, 1952 + + + +Stoiba barroi Zayas, 1952 Figure 2 - - -Stoiba barroi -Zayas 1952 + + +Stoiba barroi +Zayas 1952 : 72 [original description including figure]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Borowiec 1999 +Borowiec 1999 : 130 [catalog]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 105 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Type material. -Holotype (Fig. 2). - + +Type material. +Holotype (Fig. 2). + Type locality. Cuba: Prov. Granma or Santiago de Cuba: Sierra Maestra, between Loma Pico Palma Mocha and Pico Biscupe de -Joaquin +Joaquin , 3500 ft (see -"Remarks" +"Remarks" portion below). - -Diagnosis - + +Diagnosis + (from original description by -Zayas 1952 +Zayas 1952 ). -Stoiba barroi +Stoiba barroi is the largest among the Cuban species, similar to -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis but separated by coloration of antennae, head, and legs. -Stoiba barroi +Stoiba barroi is also similar to -Stoiba bruneri +Stoiba bruneri but distinguished by the color of the elytra, which is clearly blue, and the colors of head and legs, which are also conspicuous. Compared to -Stoiba clarildae +Stoiba clarildae , -Stoiba barroi +Stoiba barroi is more elongated and differs in colors of head, legs, and antennae. - -Description - + +Description + (from original description by -Zayas 1952 +Zayas 1952 ). Adult length 10.0 mm, width 8.0 mm. Body robust, strongly convex with antennomere XI and elytra matte black; legs dark ferruginous; lateral margin of pronotum dark yellow, depressed and convex at edge. Head concealed in dorsal view. Pronotum broadly expanded, lateral margin very upturned with well-marked transverse furrow between pronotal disc and -scutellum +scutellum ; surface finely wrinkled with scattered punctures, faintly printed; wrinkles almost imperceptible on discal area, conspicuous at the edges. Elytra strongly convex with expanded margins and elytral suture significantly lifted; surface slightly rough as on pronotum and more densely and roughly punctate. - -Distribution. -Cuba: Prov. Granma or Santiago de Cuba. + +Distribution. +Cuba: Prov. Granma or Santiago de Cuba. - - -Remarks + + +Remarks . - + According to the photograph of the holotype of -Stoiba barroi +Stoiba barroi (Fig. 2), it is easily distinguished from -Stoiba bruneri +Stoiba bruneri by brown antennomere XI (black in -Stoiba bruneri +Stoiba bruneri ). The locality information in the original description ( -Zayas 1952 +Zayas 1952 ) is not precise enough to define the province. We indicated two provinces (Granma or Santiago de Cuba) based on the collecting locality data. diff --git a/data/60/46/A1/6046A17359BCBAB71046538266CE4735.xml b/data/60/46/A1/6046A17359BCBAB71046538266CE4735.xml index 93436d36538..6280550ffe9 100644 --- a/data/60/46/A1/6046A17359BCBAB71046538266CE4735.xml +++ b/data/60/46/A1/6046A17359BCBAB71046538266CE4735.xml @@ -1,118 +1,118 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba nigricans Zayas, 1939 + + + +Stoiba nigricans Zayas, 1939 Figures 935-37 - - -Stoiba nigricans -Zayas 1939 + + +Stoiba nigricans +Zayas 1939 : 255 [original description including figure]; -Blackwelder 1946 +Blackwelder 1946 : 743 [checklist]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Borowiec 1999 +Borowiec 1999 : 131 [catalog]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 106 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Type material. -Holotype in USNM (Type No. 53530). + +Type material. +Holotype in USNM (Type No. 53530). - -Type locality. -Cuba: Prov. Santiago de Cuba: Loma Gato, Clemente. + +Type locality. +Cuba: Prov. Santiago de Cuba: Loma Gato, Clemente. - - -Specimens + + +Specimens examined. - + Cuba: Prov. Santiago de Cuba: Loma Gato, Clemente, July 1938 (USNM: holotype No. 53530); Sierra Maestra 800-4000 m, Aug 7 1929, Frere Clement, ex FC -Monros +Monros collection (USNM: 1). - -Diagnosis. - -Stoiba nigricans + +Diagnosis. + +Stoiba nigricans (Figs 35-37) is distinguished by dark antennae, brownish black pronotum and elongate, C-shaped spermatheca, these serving to separate it from -Stoiba bruneri +Stoiba bruneri and -Stoiba clarildae +Stoiba clarildae . It also differs from -Stoiba bruneri +Stoiba bruneri by the unicolored antennae and trapezoidal pronotum, and from -Stoiba clarildae +Stoiba clarildae by the pronotal base as broad as the elytral base. - -Description. - + +Description. + Adult (n=2) length 8.8-9.0mm, width 6.9-7.0mm. Body (Figs 35-37) oval, broadest between anterior 1/3 and middle of elytra in dorsal view; profile moderately convex, highest at middle of elytra. Antennae (Figs 35, 55) brownish black with antennomeres -VI-XI +VI-XI pubescent with pale setae; antennomeres -I-IV +I-IV shiny, glabrous; antennomere III 3 times as long as II, 1.3 times as long as IV. Mandible (Fig. 58) with 5 teeth, maxillary palpus (Fig. 60) and labial palpus (Fig. 62) compact. Pronotum (Fig. 35) brownish black, trapezoidal with anterior edge linear; antero-lateral edge smoothly angled, anterior 2/3 gradually broader, rounded and slightly narrower in posterior 1/3; disc slightly convex; with discal surface smooth, scale-like; lateral margin region finely and sparsely punctate. Elytra (Fig. 35) bluish black, slightly opalescent, finely punctate; margin area distinct, narrower posteriorly. Hind wing brachypterous. Spermatheca (Fig. 78) elongate, C-shaped with two openings, receptacle 0.2 times as long as pump; spermathecal duct short and coarsely coiled. - -Distribution. -Cuba: Prov. Santiago de Cuba. + +Distribution. +Cuba: Prov. Santiago de Cuba. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/6D/0F/B2/6D0FB28EC18B5C970DCBC4CE62F90CE3.xml b/data/6D/0F/B2/6D0FB28EC18B5C970DCBC4CE62F90CE3.xml index 5b588e66c08..7bfbf061368 100644 --- a/data/6D/0F/B2/6D0FB28EC18B5C970DCBC4CE62F90CE3.xml +++ b/data/6D/0F/B2/6D0FB28EC18B5C970DCBC4CE62F90CE3.xml @@ -1,153 +1,153 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba angusticollis (Suffrian, 1868) + + + +Stoiba angusticollis (Suffrian, 1868) Figures 11-13 - - -Chelymorpha angusticollis -Suffrian 1868 + + +Chelymorpha angusticollis +Suffrian 1868 : 239; -Gemminger and Harold 1876 +Gemminger and Harold 1876 : 3638 [catalog]; -Leng and Mutchler 1914 +Leng and Mutchler 1914 : 458 [list of the West Indies -Coleoptera +Coleoptera ]. - -Stoiba angusticollis + +Stoiba angusticollis : -Spaeth 1909 +Spaeth 1909 : 720 [catalog], -1914 +1914 : 51 [catalog]; -Blackwelder 1946 +Blackwelder 1946 : 743 [checklist]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Borowiec 1996 +Borowiec 1996 : 229 [faunistic record], -1999 +1999 : 130 [catalog]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 105 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Type material. -Unknown. + +Type material. +Unknown. - -Type locality. - -"Cuba" + +Type locality. + +"Cuba" - -Specimens examined. - + +Specimens examined. + Cuba: Prov. La Havana: ex FC Bowditch collection (MCZ: 2); ex F -Monros +Monros collection (USNM: 1); no further data (AMNH: 2; MCZ: 1; MMUE: 1; USNM: 1); Pinar del Rio: Pan de Guajaibon, May 17 1953, MJ Jaume (INHS: 1); Soroa July 6-7 1974, Z&M -Meszaros +Meszaros (UWCP: 1). - -Diagnosis. - -Stoiba angusticollis + +Diagnosis. + +Stoiba angusticollis is one of three species with brown tone elytra. This species is easily distinguished from the other two -Stoiba +Stoiba species ( -Stoiba fuscicornis +Stoiba fuscicornis and -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii ) with brown elytra by body shape, dorsal surface coarsely and roughly punctate, opaque coloration, mouth parts, and collecting locality. Body distinctly (Fig. 12) convex; dorsal surface coarsely and densely punctate (Fig. 11), opaque brown; mandible (Fig. 58) with 5 teeth; maxillary palpus (Fig. 60) and labial palpus (Fig. 62) compact; collection locality in Cuba. - - -Description + + +Description . - + Adult (n=10) length 6.1-8.0 mm, width 6.0-7.8 mm. Body (Figs 11-13) rounded with elytral base broader than pronotal base; profile (Fig. 12), 0.5 times as convex as long, often discontinuous between pronotal and elytral bases, highest at anterior 1/3 of elytra; color brown to reddish brown, opaque; surface texture scale-like, roughly and coarsely punctate. Antenna (Figs 11, 47) as long as or slightly longer than pronotal lateral edge; antennomeres -I-II +I-II reddish brown, shiny, darker apically; III long, broader apically, 2 times longer than II, 1.2 times longer than IV; -V-XI +V-XI pubescent with long setae on apex. Mandible with 5 teeth; maxillary palpus and labial palpus compact. Pronotum (Fig. 11) hemispherical with anterior margin slightly emarginate; disc slightly convex with longitudinal cleavage on surface medially. Elytra distinctly convex, finely and more coarsely punctate than pronotum. Spermatheca (Fig. 72) falcate with two openings; receptacle 0.2 times as long as pump; spermathecal duct moderately coiled. - - + + Figures 11-19. Habitus.11-13 -Stoiba angusticollis +Stoiba angusticollis 11 dorsal view 12 lateral view 13 ventral view 14-16 -Stoiba bruneri +Stoiba bruneri 14 dorsal view 15 lateral view 16 ventral view 17-19 -Stoiba clarildae +Stoiba clarildae (Holotype) 17 dorsal view 18 lateral view 19 ventral view. (scale bar = 1.0 mm) - -Distribution. -Cuba: Prov. La Havana; Pinar del Rio. + +Distribution. +Cuba: Prov. La Havana; Pinar del Rio. - -Remarks. - + +Remarks. + Our description was made by observing the examined specimens and comparing to the original description ( -Suffrian 1868 +Suffrian 1868 ). The original description is sufficient to recognize the species with features such as convex body, coloration, and collecting location. The description corresponds to our observation. diff --git a/data/6F/8C/D2/6F8CD2562BDD8E544BA99F1F73622334.xml b/data/6F/8C/D2/6F8CD2562BDD8E544BA99F1F73622334.xml index 11c1cf39410..0a62d2680a6 100644 --- a/data/6F/8C/D2/6F8CD2562BDD8E544BA99F1F73622334.xml +++ b/data/6F/8C/D2/6F8CD2562BDD8E544BA99F1F73622334.xml @@ -1,109 +1,109 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba marginata Blake, 1934 + + + +Stoiba marginata Blake, 1934 Figures 832-34 - - -Stoiba marginata -Blake 1934 + + +Stoiba marginata +Blake 1934 : 53 [original description including figure]; -Blackwelder 1946 +Blackwelder 1946 : 743 [checklist]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Borowiec 1999 +Borowiec 1999 : 131 [catalog]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 106 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Type material. -Holotype and paratype in USNM (Type No. 44325). + +Type material. +Holotype and paratype in USNM (Type No. 44325). - -Type locality. - + +Type locality. + Cuba: Prov. Sancti -Spiritus +Spiritus , Buenos Aires, Trinidad Mts., 2350-2800 ft. - -Specimens examined. - + +Specimens examined. + Cuba: Prov. Sancti -Spiritus +Spiritus , Buenos Aires, Trinidad Mts., 2350-2800 ft. May 4 1932, SC Bruner, Otero. EEA de Cuba No. 9872. (USNM: holotype, paratype, type No. 44325); June 17-23 1939, CT Parsons (MCZ: 1). - -Diagnosis. - -Stoiba marginata + +Diagnosis. + +Stoiba marginata (Figs 32-34) differs from -Stoiba fascicollis +Stoiba fascicollis by the elytral base broader than the pronotal base, black pronotal coloration extending to the base, prosternum black, coarsely punctate dorsal surface of the pronotum and elytra, black elytral disc with coloration extending to antero-lateral region of marginal area and femora black over their proximal half. - -Description. -Adult (n=3) length 8.2−8.4 mm, width 7.6−7.8 mm. Body (Figs 32-34) rounded, widest and highest near middle. Color of head, antennae, pronotum margin area and elytra margin area brown except for black antero-lateral region of elytra margin; legs brown with coxae, trochanters and over proximal half of femora black. Head withdrawn into prothorax, up to half of eyes in dorsal view; inter-ocular area 2 times as broad as eye, flat with cranial suture and antennal sockets medially; maxillary palpus (Fig. 60) and labial palpus (Fig. 62) compact. Pronotum hemispherical with anterior edge slightly emarginate; surface coarsely and roughly punctate; base 2.2 times as broad as anterior edge; disc well defined by black coloration surrounded brown margin area except for anterior region. Prosternum (Fig. 34) black with brown hypomeron. Scutellum triangular, black, scale-like or occasionally punctate. Elytra (Fig. 33) moderately convex with surface coarsely and roughly punctate; discal area defined by black coloration with black coloration extending to middle of margin area; umbone slightly projected; margin area mainly brown, narrower posteriorly, extending to rear end. Hind wing brachypterous. Legs (Fig. 34) mainly brown with coxae, trochanters, and over proximal half of femora black. Spermatheca (Fig. 77) falcate with two openings, gradually narrower; receptacle area narrow and not well defined; spermathecal duct loosely coiled. + +Description. +Adult (n=3) length 8.2−8.4 mm, width 7.6−7.8 mm. Body (Figs 32-34) rounded, widest and highest near middle. Color of head, antennae, pronotum margin area and elytra margin area brown except for black antero-lateral region of elytra margin; legs brown with coxae, trochanters and over proximal half of femora black. Head withdrawn into prothorax, up to half of eyes in dorsal view; inter-ocular area 2 times as broad as eye, flat with cranial suture and antennal sockets medially; maxillary palpus (Fig. 60) and labial palpus (Fig. 62) compact. Pronotum hemispherical with anterior edge slightly emarginate; surface coarsely and roughly punctate; base 2.2 times as broad as anterior edge; disc well defined by black coloration surrounded brown margin area except for anterior region. Prosternum (Fig. 34) black with brown hypomeron. Scutellum triangular, black, scale-like or occasionally punctate. Elytra (Fig. 33) moderately convex with surface coarsely and roughly punctate; discal area defined by black coloration with black coloration extending to middle of margin area; umbone slightly projected; margin area mainly brown, narrower posteriorly, extending to rear end. Hind wing brachypterous. Legs (Fig. 34) mainly brown with coxae, trochanters, and over proximal half of femora black. Spermatheca (Fig. 77) falcate with two openings, gradually narrower; receptacle area narrow and not well defined; spermathecal duct loosely coiled. - -Distribution. - + +Distribution. + Cuba: Sancti -Spiritus +Spiritus . diff --git a/data/79/1C/26/791C263B3A6E67699178F5CE2070FB4C.xml b/data/79/1C/26/791C263B3A6E67699178F5CE2070FB4C.xml index 8de7ddc520f..ca4bcb222c0 100644 --- a/data/79/1C/26/791C263B3A6E67699178F5CE2070FB4C.xml +++ b/data/79/1C/26/791C263B3A6E67699178F5CE2070FB4C.xml @@ -1,101 +1,101 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Decapauropus prolixus -sp. n. + + + +Decapauropus prolixus +sp. n. Figs 1-9 - -Material. -Holotype ad. 9(♂), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-096. - 1 specimen. + +Material. +Holotype ad. 9(♂), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-096. - 1 specimen. - -Etymology. -From the Latin prolictus, stretched out long (referring to the posterolateral appendages of the anal plate). + +Etymology. +From the Latin prolictus, stretched out long (referring to the posterolateral appendages of the anal plate). - -Diagnosis. - -Decapauropus prolixus + +Diagnosis. + +Decapauropus prolixus may be close to -Decapauropus bispinus -Scheller (2009) +Decapauropus bispinus +Scheller (2009) from Sulawesi in Indonesia but can readily be distinguished from it by the shape of the temporal organs of the head, in tergal view small and longish in -Decapauropus prolixus +Decapauropus prolixus , large in -Decapauropus bispinus +Decapauropus bispinus , the antennal globulus g, pyriform, not spherical, the shape of the pygidial st, long, thin, cylindrical, not short, globular, and the lateral margins of the anal plate, parallel, not distinctly convex. - - -Description + + +Description . -Length. 0.48 mm. Head (Fig. 1). Setae on the tergal side subcylindrical striate. Relative lengths of setae, 1st row: a1=10, a2=12; 2nd row: a1=14, a2=15, a3=17; 3rd row: a1=12, a2=15; 4th row: a1=14, a2=15, a3=18, a4=11; lateral group setae, l1=18, l2≈17, l3=?. Ratio a1/a1-a1 in 1st row 0.9, 2nd row 0.5, 3rd row 0.8, 4th row 1.5. Temporal organs small, in tergal view ovoid, as long as their shortest distance apart. Head cuticle glabrous. - -Antennae +Length. 0.48 mm. Head (Fig. 1). Setae on the tergal side subcylindrical striate. Relative lengths of setae, 1st row: a1=10, a2=12; 2nd row: a1=14, a2=15, a3=17; 3rd row: a1=12, a2=15; 4th row: a1=14, a2=15, a3=18, a4=11; lateral group setae, l1=18, l2≈17, l3=?. Ratio a1/a1-a1 in 1st row 0.9, 2nd row 0.5, 3rd row 0.8, 4th row 1.5. Temporal organs small, in tergal view ovoid, as long as their shortest distance apart. Head cuticle glabrous. + +Antennae (Fig. 2). Segment 4 with 4 cylindrical striate setae; their relative lengths: p=10, -p' +p' =8, -p'' +p'' =2, r=5. Tergal seta p 0.9 of the length of tergal branch t. The latter fusiform, 2.7 times as long as its greatest diameter and 1.1 times as long as the length of sternal branchs,that branch 1.7 times as long as its greatest diameter; anterodistal corner distinctly truncate. Seta q cylindrical striate, 0.7 of the length of s. Relative lengths of flagella (basal segments included) and basal segments: F1=100, bs1=7; F2=58, bs2=5; F3=91, bs3=5. F1 3.4 times as long as t, F2 and F3 2.1 and 3.3 times as long as s respectively. Distal calyces of F1 and F3 conical, those of F2 hemispherical, distal part of flagella axes inconsiderably widened below calyces. Globulus g proportionally large, pyriform, 1.5 times as long as wide, ≈10 bracts, capsule subspherical; width of g as long as the greatest diameter of t. Antennae glabrous. -Trunk (Figs 3, 4). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 3) simple cylindrical striate, sublateral setae 1.3 times as long as submedian setae; sternite process triangular, blunt anteriorly; appendages tapering distally, caps low. Process and appendages glabrous. Setae on tergites as setae on the head, 4+4 setae on tergite I and?4+2 on VI, interposed tergites not studied. Submedian posterior setae on VI (Fig. 4) 0.5 of interdistance and 0.6 of the length of pygidial setae a1. -Genital papillae (Fig. 5). Proximal 2/3 subcylindrical, distal part tapering into an subcylindrical top, papillae 2.1 times as long as the greatest diameter, seta thin, 0.3 of the length of papilla. - +Trunk (Figs 3, 4). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 3) simple cylindrical striate, sublateral setae 1.3 times as long as submedian setae; sternite process triangular, blunt anteriorly; appendages tapering distally, caps low. Process and appendages glabrous. Setae on tergites as setae on the head, 4+4 setae on tergite I and?4+2 on VI, interposed tergites not studied. Submedian posterior setae on VI (Fig. 4) 0.5 of interdistance and 0.6 of the length of pygidial setae a1. +Genital papillae (Fig. 5). Proximal 2/3 subcylindrical, distal part tapering into an subcylindrical top, papillae 2.1 times as long as the greatest diameter, seta thin, 0.3 of the length of papilla. + Bothriotricha (Fig. 6). Relative lengths: T1=T3=100, T2=108, T4=138, T5=196; axes simple straight, very thin and with faint pubescence only distally, T3 only (Fig. 6) stronger, fusiformly thickened in distal -3/4 +3/4 and with distinct oblique pubescence. -Legs (Figs 7, 8). Setae on coxa and trochanter (Fig. 7) of leg 9 furcate, branches cylindrical striate, secondary branch shorter than primary one. These setae more anteriorly with rudimentary secondary branches except in coxal setae of leg 2. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 8) tapering, 3.5 times as long as its greatest diameter; proximal seta very thin tapering pointed, distal seta subcylindrical blunt striate, proximal one 0.3 of the length of tarsus and as long as the length of distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. -Pygidium (Fig. 9). Tergum. Posterior margin between st straight. Relative lengths of setae: a1=10, a2=9, a3=19, st=6; setae directed posteriorly, a1 and a3 almost straight, a2 and st curved inwards, a1 striate distally. Distance a1-a1 0.9 of the length of a1, distance a1-a2 twice longer than distance a2-a3; distance st-st 1.3 times as long as st and as long as distance a1-a1. -Sternum. Posterior margin with low and broad bulge below base of anal plate. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1=31, b2=10, setae thin tapering, b1 with short pubescence distally, 1.4 times as long as interdistance, b2 0.7 of distance b1-b2. - +Legs (Figs 7, 8). Setae on coxa and trochanter (Fig. 7) of leg 9 furcate, branches cylindrical striate, secondary branch shorter than primary one. These setae more anteriorly with rudimentary secondary branches except in coxal setae of leg 2. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 8) tapering, 3.5 times as long as its greatest diameter; proximal seta very thin tapering pointed, distal seta subcylindrical blunt striate, proximal one 0.3 of the length of tarsus and as long as the length of distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. +Pygidium (Fig. 9). Tergum. Posterior margin between st straight. Relative lengths of setae: a1=10, a2=9, a3=19, st=6; setae directed posteriorly, a1 and a3 almost straight, a2 and st curved inwards, a1 striate distally. Distance a1-a1 0.9 of the length of a1, distance a1-a2 twice longer than distance a2-a3; distance st-st 1.3 times as long as st and as long as distance a1-a1. +Sternum. Posterior margin with low and broad bulge below base of anal plate. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1=31, b2=10, setae thin tapering, b1 with short pubescence distally, 1.4 times as long as interdistance, b2 0.7 of distance b1-b2. + Anal plate directed posteriorly, lateral margins parallel, posterodistal corners lengthened into two long tapering and distally faintly striate appendages, these ≈1.6 times as long as the length of plate; posterior margin between appendages U-shaped and with two short tapering glabrous appendages protruding backwards from sternal margin, length of short appendages ≈ -1/4 +1/4 of the length of posterolateral appendages; plate glabrous. - - -Figures + + +Figures 1-9. -Decapauropus prolixus +Decapauropus prolixus sp. n., holotype, ad. 9(♂) 1 head, median and right part 2 left antenna, sternal view 3 collum segment, median and left part, sternal view 4 tergite VI, posterior part 5 genital papillae and seta on coxa of leg 2, anterior view; 6T3 7 seta on trochanter of leg 9 8 tarsus of leg 9 9 pygidium, posteromedian and left part, sternal view. Scale: a: Figs 4-8; b: 1-3; c: 9. diff --git a/data/7B/6B/09/7B6B09A968C9BFF2AA7C3890445C894F.xml b/data/7B/6B/09/7B6B09A968C9BFF2AA7C3890445C894F.xml index 63ff22d83fe..d783941289e 100644 --- a/data/7B/6B/09/7B6B09A968C9BFF2AA7C3890445C894F.xml +++ b/data/7B/6B/09/7B6B09A968C9BFF2AA7C3890445C894F.xml @@ -1,52 +1,52 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Samarangopus umbonifer Scheller, 1995 + + + +Samarangopus umbonifer Scheller, 1995 - -Material. -Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1 ad. 9(♀), 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-086. - 1 specimen. + +Material. +Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1 ad. 9(♀), 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-086. - 1 specimen. - -General distribution. - + +General distribution. + Known from Doi Inthanon only ( -Scheller 1995 +Scheller 1995 ). diff --git a/data/7E/99/FC/7E99FC8C711BD46EEE39315A1BA5017B.xml b/data/7E/99/FC/7E99FC8C711BD46EEE39315A1BA5017B.xml index 3e549684c43..ee055cc80e9 100644 --- a/data/7E/99/FC/7E99FC8C711BD46EEE39315A1BA5017B.xml +++ b/data/7E/99/FC/7E99FC8C711BD46EEE39315A1BA5017B.xml @@ -1,92 +1,92 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Decapauropus premnos -sp. n. + + + +Decapauropus premnos +sp. n. Figs 28-35 - -Material. -Holotype ad. 9(♀), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, below the top, primary rain forest, soil, alt. 2400 m, 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-195. - Paratype subad. 8(♀), below the top, primary rain forest, soil, alt. 2400 m, 1991.vii.8, loc. CM-243. - Other material, 1 juv. 5, ibidem, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1991.vi.30, CM-064. - 3 specimens. + +Material. +Holotype ad. 9(♀), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, below the top, primary rain forest, soil, alt. 2400 m, 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-195. - Paratype subad. 8(♀), below the top, primary rain forest, soil, alt. 2400 m, 1991.vii.8, loc. CM-243. - Other material, 1 juv. 5, ibidem, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1991.vi.30, CM-064. - 3 specimens. - -Etymology. -From the Greek premnos, stump of a tree (referring to the thick stalk of the antennal globulus g). + +Etymology. +From the Greek premnos, stump of a tree (referring to the thick stalk of the antennal globulus g). - -Diagnosis. - -Decapauropus premnos + +Diagnosis. + +Decapauropus premnos seems to be close to -Decapauropus mortensenii +Decapauropus mortensenii (Hansen) which was described (1902) from the island Koh Chang in the Gulf of Thailand and later has been reported from Egypt, Seychelles, Sri Lanka, Java and Sumatra, and New Caledonia (with uncertainty also from -Reunion +Reunion , Mauritius and Australia). The new species can be distinguished from -Decapauropus mortensenii +Decapauropus mortensenii by its thick stalk of the antennal globulus g, narrow in -Decapauropus mortensenii +Decapauropus mortensenii ,the distal part of the bothriotrix T3, with marked swelling, not evenly thickened, by the shape of the tarsi, subcylindrical and only somewhat tapering, not slender and strongly tapering, by the proportion b2/b1-b2, as long as, -not +not b2>b1-b2, and by the shape of the anal plate, longish and with evenly convex lateral margins, not shorter/broader and with shallow lateral indentation. - -Description. - + +Description. + Length. 0.62 mm. Head (Fig. 28). Setae on the tergal side thin cylindrical annulate. Relative lengths of setae, 1st row: a1=a2=10; 2nd row: a1=?, a2=12, a3=14; 3rd row: a1=11, a2=10; 4th row: a1=8, a2=10, a3=?, a4=11; lateral group setae, l1=25, l2=26, -l +l 3=?. Ratio a1/a1-a1 in 1st row 1.0, 2nd row?, 3rd row 0.6, 4th row 0.8. Temporal organs large, in tergal view ovoid, length 0.8 of shortest interdistance. Head cuticle glabrous. - + Antennae (Fig. 29). Segment 4 with at least three cylindrical annulate setae; their relative lengths: p=10, -p' +p' =6, r=5. Tergal seta p 1.2 times as long as the length of tergal branch t. The latter fusiform with distal end cut obliquely, 2.1 times as long as its greatest diameter and 0.9 of the length of sternal branchs,that branch twice longer than its greatest diameter; anterodistal corner distinctly truncate. Seta q cylindrical striate, 0.6 of the length of s. Relative lengths of flagella (basal segments included) and basal segments: F1=100, bs1=6; F2=27, bs2=4; F3=82, bs3=5. F1 5.0 times as long as t, F2 and F3 1.2 and 3.6 times as long as s respectively. Distal calyces somewhat flattened, distal part of flagella axes inconsiderably widened below calyces. Globulus g proportionally large, pyriform, with thick stalk, 1.2 times as long as wide, ≈12 thin bracts, capsule with flattened bottom; width of g 1.1 times as long as the greatest diameter of t. Antennae glabrous. -Trunk (Figs 30, 31). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 30) simple cylindrical striate, sublateral setae 1.4 times as long as submedian setae; sternite process triangular, blunt anteriorly; appendages barrel-shaped, caps low. Process and appendages glabrous. Setae on tergites as setae on the head, 4+4 setae on tergite I and 4+2 on VI, interposed tergites not studied. Submedian posterior setae on VI (Fig. 31) 0.3 of interdistance and 0.8 of the length of pygidial setae a1. -Bothriotricha (Fig. 32). Relative lengths: T1=100, T2=103, T3=76, T4=?, T5=107; axes simple straight, very thin and with faint pubescence only distally on T1, T2 and T5, T3 only (Fig. 32) stronger, with longish cylindrical end-swelling and distinct oblique pubescence. -Legs (Figs 33, 34). Setae on coxa (Fig. 33) and trochanter of leg 9 furcate, branches thin cylindrical striate, secondary branch somewhat thinner and shorter than primary one. These setae more anteriorly with rudimentary secondary branches. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 34) subcylindrical, only somewhat tapering, 2.9 times as long as its greatest diameter; setae thin, proximal one tapering pointed, distal one subcylindrical blunt striate, proximal seta 0.4 of the length of tarsus and 2.1 times as long the length of distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. -Pygidium (Fig. 35). Tergum. Posterior margin straight but with posterolateral corners rounded and two small rounded lobes just outside st. Relative lengths of setae: a1=st=10, a2=16, a3=26. Setae curved inwards, st also converging, a1 and st cylindrical with small swelling distally, a2 and a3 long thin tapering, a2 pointed. Distance a1-a1 0.7 of the length of a1, distance a1-a2 1.4 times as long as a2-a3; distance st-st 1.8 times as long as st and 1.1 times as long as distance a1-a1. -Sternum. Posterior margin with five rounded lobes, one on each side of insertion areas of setae b1 and one below base of anal plate. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1=28, b2=19, setae thin tapering pointed glabrous, b1 1.1 times as long as interdistance, b2 1.1 times as long as distance b1-b2. -Anal plate large, directed posteriorly, 1.7 times longer than broad, lateral margins convex, narrowing off posteriorly and with U-shaped posterior incision, length of the latter 0.3 of the length of plate, plate glabrous. - - +Trunk (Figs 30, 31). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 30) simple cylindrical striate, sublateral setae 1.4 times as long as submedian setae; sternite process triangular, blunt anteriorly; appendages barrel-shaped, caps low. Process and appendages glabrous. Setae on tergites as setae on the head, 4+4 setae on tergite I and 4+2 on VI, interposed tergites not studied. Submedian posterior setae on VI (Fig. 31) 0.3 of interdistance and 0.8 of the length of pygidial setae a1. +Bothriotricha (Fig. 32). Relative lengths: T1=100, T2=103, T3=76, T4=?, T5=107; axes simple straight, very thin and with faint pubescence only distally on T1, T2 and T5, T3 only (Fig. 32) stronger, with longish cylindrical end-swelling and distinct oblique pubescence. +Legs (Figs 33, 34). Setae on coxa (Fig. 33) and trochanter of leg 9 furcate, branches thin cylindrical striate, secondary branch somewhat thinner and shorter than primary one. These setae more anteriorly with rudimentary secondary branches. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 34) subcylindrical, only somewhat tapering, 2.9 times as long as its greatest diameter; setae thin, proximal one tapering pointed, distal one subcylindrical blunt striate, proximal seta 0.4 of the length of tarsus and 2.1 times as long the length of distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. +Pygidium (Fig. 35). Tergum. Posterior margin straight but with posterolateral corners rounded and two small rounded lobes just outside st. Relative lengths of setae: a1=st=10, a2=16, a3=26. Setae curved inwards, st also converging, a1 and st cylindrical with small swelling distally, a2 and a3 long thin tapering, a2 pointed. Distance a1-a1 0.7 of the length of a1, distance a1-a2 1.4 times as long as a2-a3; distance st-st 1.8 times as long as st and 1.1 times as long as distance a1-a1. +Sternum. Posterior margin with five rounded lobes, one on each side of insertion areas of setae b1 and one below base of anal plate. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1=28, b2=19, setae thin tapering pointed glabrous, b1 1.1 times as long as interdistance, b2 1.1 times as long as distance b1-b2. +Anal plate large, directed posteriorly, 1.7 times longer than broad, lateral margins convex, narrowing off posteriorly and with U-shaped posterior incision, length of the latter 0.3 of the length of plate, plate glabrous. + + Figures 28-35. -Decapauropus premnos +Decapauropus premnos sp. n., holotype, ad. 9(♀) 28 head, median and right part 29 right antenna, tergal view 30 collum segment, median and left part, sternal view 31 tergite VI, posterior part 32T3 33 seta on coxa of leg 9; 34 tarsus of leg 9 35 pygidium, posteromedian and left posterior corner, tergal view. Scale: a: Figs 32-34; b: 28, 29, 31; c: 30. 35. diff --git a/data/83/96/0F/83960FA46E0ADB0379D28E7B030A0A95.xml b/data/83/96/0F/83960FA46E0ADB0379D28E7B030A0A95.xml index 1cf0131fecc..2b1b48f1185 100644 --- a/data/83/96/0F/83960FA46E0ADB0379D28E7B030A0A95.xml +++ b/data/83/96/0F/83960FA46E0ADB0379D28E7B030A0A95.xml @@ -1,113 +1,113 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - -Themus (s.str.) scutulatus Wittmer, 1983 + + + +Themus (s.str.) scutulatus Wittmer, 1983 - - -Themus rufoscutus -Pic 1926a + + +Themus rufoscutus +Pic 1926a : 35. [Secondary homonym, preoccupied by -Themus rufoscutus +Themus rufoscutus (Pic, 1922), originally described in -Cantharis +Cantharis .] - -Themus + +Themus (s.str.) scutulatus -Wittmer 1983a +Wittmer 1983a : 208. [Replacement name for -Themus rufoscutus +Themus rufoscutus Pic, 1926, nec -Pic 1922 +Pic 1922 .] - -Themus + +Themus (s.str.) hmong -Kazantsev 2007 +Kazantsev 2007 : 54. [Replacement name for -Themus rufoscutus +Themus rufoscutus Pic, 1926, nec -Pic 1921 +Pic 1921 [1922].] syn. n. - -Distribution. -Vietnam. + +Distribution. +Vietnam. - -Remarks. - + +Remarks. + This species was originally described as -Themus rufoscutus +Themus rufoscutus Pic, 1926 (located in Vietnam), which became a junior secondary homonym of -Themus rufoscutus +Themus rufoscutus (Pic, 1922) (located in Yunnan, China) since the taxonomic status of the latter was changed by -Wittmer (1983a) +Wittmer (1983a) , so the former was replaced by -Themus +Themus (s.str.) scutulatus in the latter study. However, this nomenclature change was neglected by -Kazantsev (2007) +Kazantsev (2007) , so that -Themus rufoscutus +Themus rufoscutus Pic, 1926 was replaced again by -Themus +Themus (s.str.) hmong. In the same work ( -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 ), the distribution of this species was recorded occurring in both Vietnam and China (Yunnan). Obviously, -Themus +Themus (s.str.) hmong is a junior objective synonym of -Themus +Themus (s.str.) scutulatus (ICZN, 4th ed., article 72.7), which should be restricted to Vietnam and excluded from the Chinese fauna at the moment. diff --git a/data/85/32/A9/8532A917C73046B357260F6BE2F6CA76.xml b/data/85/32/A9/8532A917C73046B357260F6BE2F6CA76.xml index bccec459f20..cd16759825e 100644 --- a/data/85/32/A9/8532A917C73046B357260F6BE2F6CA76.xml +++ b/data/85/32/A9/8532A917C73046B357260F6BE2F6CA76.xml @@ -1,111 +1,111 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - -Themus (s.str.) regalis (Gorham, 1889) -nom. rest. + + + +Themus (s.str.) regalis (Gorham, 1889) +nom. rest. - - -Telephorus regalis -Gorham 1889 + + +Telephorus regalis +Gorham 1889 : 103. [Synonymized with -Themus imperialis +Themus imperialis (Gorham, 1889) by -Wittmer 1983a +Wittmer 1983a : 215.] - -Telephorus imperialis -Gorham 1889 + +Telephorus imperialis +Gorham 1889 : 102, t. 10, fig. 8. [Primary homonym, preoccupied by -Telephorus imperialis +Telephorus imperialis Redtenbacher, 1867.] - -Cantharis imperator -Pic 1906 + +Cantharis imperator +Pic 1906 : 81. [Replacement name for -Telephorus imperialis +Telephorus imperialis Gorham, 1889, nec Redtenbacher 1867.] - -Themus imperator + +Themus imperator : -Jacobson 1911 +Jacobson 1911 : 675. - -Themus regalis + +Themus regalis : -Jacobson 1911 +Jacobson 1911 : 675. - -Themus + +Themus (s.str.) imperialis: -Wittmer 1983a +Wittmer 1983a : 215. - -Distribution. -China, Vietnam. + +Distribution. +China, Vietnam. - -Remarks. - -Telephorus imperialis + +Remarks. + +Telephorus imperialis Gorham, 1889 is a primary homonym and preoccupied by -Telephorus imperialis +Telephorus imperialis Redtenbacher, 1867, so the former is permanently invalid (ICZN, 4th ed., article 57.2) and should be replaced by the next oldest available name among its synonyms (ICZN, 4th ed., article 23.3.5), that is, -Themus +Themus (s.str.) regalis (Gorham, 1889) should be restated as the valid name for this species. diff --git a/data/92/EE/A1/92EEA1650B6CF4F85F26D699D954A64C.xml b/data/92/EE/A1/92EEA1650B6CF4F85F26D699D954A64C.xml index a7d36129372..33d2069850e 100644 --- a/data/92/EE/A1/92EEA1650B6CF4F85F26D699D954A64C.xml +++ b/data/92/EE/A1/92EEA1650B6CF4F85F26D699D954A64C.xml @@ -1,142 +1,142 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - - -Lycocerus + + + + +Lycocerus plebejus (Kiesenwetter, 1874) Figs 14−15 - - -Cantharis plebeja -Kiesenwetter 1874 + + +Cantharis plebeja +Kiesenwetter 1874 : 278. - -Lycocerus plebejus + +Lycocerus plebejus : -Okushima 2005 +Okushima 2005 : 114-116, figs 11e, 12g, 14e, 32, 90. - -Cantharis rufonotaticeps -Pic 1921 + +Cantharis rufonotaticeps +Pic 1921 : 29. syn. n. - -Cantharis brunneonotaticeps -Pic 1922 + +Cantharis brunneonotaticeps +Pic 1922 : 32. - -Athemus brunneonotaticeps + +Athemus brunneonotaticeps : -Wittmer 1995 +Wittmer 1995 : 268, fig. 199. - -Lycocerus brunneonotaticeps + +Lycocerus brunneonotaticeps : -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 : 249. syn. n. - -Type material examined. - -Cantharis rufonotaticeps + +Type material examined. + +Cantharis rufonotaticeps : Holotype ♀ (MNHN): [p]"Kiautschau \ China", [h]"rufonotaticeps \ n. sp.", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" . - -Cantharis brunneonotaticeps + +Cantharis brunneonotaticeps : Holotype ♀ (MNHN): [p]"Kiautschau \ China", [h]"brunneonotaticeps \ n. sp.", [h]"Athemus? \ brunneonotaticeps \ (Pic) \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" . - -Additional material examined. - + +Additional material examined. + CHINA: Shanghai: 1♂ (NHMB): "China, Kiangsu Prov., Shanghai, 15.IV.1932, A. Bavio coll."; 1♂, 1♀ (IZAS): "China, Kiangsu Prov., Shanghai, Zi-ka-wei, 20.IV.1924". Jiangxi: 1♀ (MNHN): -"Sued-China +"Sued-China , Pingshiang, Dr. Kreyenberg". Fujian: 1♂ (NHMB): "Fukien, Chungan, Bohea Hill, 15.III.1940, coll. T. C. Maa"; 1♀ (NHMB): same data, 16.III.1940; 1♂, 1♀ (NHMB): same data, 29.III.1940; 1♂ (NHMB): "Fukien, Shaowu, Shuipeikai, 3.IV.1942, coll. T. C. Maa"; 1♂ (NHMB): "Fukien, Shaowu, Kuhsienkai, IV.1944, coll. T. C. Maa"; 1♀ (NHMB): "Fukien, Chungan, Kuatun, IV.1942, coll. T. C. Maa"; 1♂ (IZAS): Shaowu, Chengguan, 150−220m, 19.IV.1960, leg. Cheng-Lin Ma; 1♀ (IZAS): same locality, 160−210m, 17.III.1960, leg. Yong Zuo; 1♀ (IZAS): same locality, 150−190m, 18.III.1960, leg. Yong Zuo. Guangxi: 1♂ (IZAS): Guilin, Liangfeng, 17.III.1952; 1♀ (IZAS): same locality, 26.III.1952. Sichuan: 1♀ (IZAS): Mt. Emei, Baoguosi, 550−750m, 7.IV.1957, leg. Ke-Ren Huang; 1♂ (IZAS): same locality, 12.IV.1957, leg. You-Cai Yu; 1♀ (IZAS): same data, 19.IV.1957; 1♀ (IZAS): same data, 3.IV.1957. - -Distribution. -China (Shandong, Shanghai, Jiangxi, Fujian, Guangxi, Sichuan). + +Distribution. +China (Shandong, Shanghai, Jiangxi, Fujian, Guangxi, Sichuan). - -Remarks. - + +Remarks. + Having examined the holotypes of -Cantharis rufonotaticeps +Cantharis rufonotaticeps Pic, 1921 and -Lycocerus brunneonotaticeps +Lycocerus brunneonotaticeps (Pic, 1922) (originally in -Cantharis +Cantharis ), as well as a large series of additional specimens including both sexes, we were unable to find differences justifying their separation, although some variation in the coloration of head and elytra, which has led us to consider all the examined specimens of both nominal species to be conspecific. Furthermore, we discovered that their characters are consistent with the redescription and illustrations of -Lycocerus plebejus +Lycocerus plebejus (Kiesenwetter, 1874) provided by -Okushima (2005) +Okushima (2005) . Consequently, we synonymized -Cantharis rufonotaticeps +Cantharis rufonotaticeps and -Lycocerus brunneonotaticeps +Lycocerus brunneonotaticeps under -Lycocerus plebejus +Lycocerus plebejus , whichconfirmed -Okushima's +Okushima's presum that the latter occurs in China but Japan. diff --git a/data/96/B4/BB/96B4BB3F5290B2057DFD3896DF8AA4CB.xml b/data/96/B4/BB/96B4BB3F5290B2057DFD3896DF8AA4CB.xml index 704b02bc954..099486bd878 100644 --- a/data/96/B4/BB/96B4BB3F5290B2057DFD3896DF8AA4CB.xml +++ b/data/96/B4/BB/96B4BB3F5290B2057DFD3896DF8AA4CB.xml @@ -1,104 +1,104 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Borneopauropus platylopas -sp. n. + + + +Borneopauropus platylopas +sp. n. Figs 61-71 - -Material. -Holotype ad. 9(♂), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1992.vi.30, loc. CM-080. - Paratype, ad. 9(♀), ibidem, loc. CM-194. - 2 specimens. + +Material. +Holotype ad. 9(♂), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1992.vi.30, loc. CM-080. - Paratype, ad. 9(♀), ibidem, loc. CM-194. - 2 specimens. - -Etymology. -From the Greek platys, broad, and lopas, plate (referring to the unusually broad anal plate). + +Etymology. +From the Greek platys, broad, and lopas, plate (referring to the unusually broad anal plate). - -Diagnosis. - + +Diagnosis. + Up to now four species have been described in the genus, one from Sulawesi in Indonesia, two from Sabah and one from Tasmania. -Borneopauropus platylopas +Borneopauropus platylopas has most characters -in +in common with the Indonesian species, -Borneopauropus curtipes +Borneopauropus curtipes Scheller ( -Scheller 2009 +Scheller 2009 ) and one of the two species from Sabah, -Borneopauropus penanorum +Borneopauropus penanorum Scheller ( -Scheller et al. 1994 +Scheller et al. 1994 ). It can be distinguished from both by the shape of the bothriotricha T3, clavate part moderately widened with long distal flagellum in -Borneopauropus platylopas +Borneopauropus platylopas , not strongly widened and with shorter flagellum in -Borneopauropus curtipes -and -Borneopauropus penanorum +Borneopauropus curtipes +and +Borneopauropus penanorum , and by the shape of the pygidial setae a3, long thin tapering, not bladder-shaped, and the shape of the anal plate, broad triangular, not longish linguiform. -Description. Length. (0.51-)0.58 mm. Head (Fig. 61). Tergal and lateral sides with 26 setae arranged as in Fig. 61; transversal rows indistinct laterally. Setae longest in posteromedian part; all but lateral setae clavate, shortly pubescent, lateral group setae cylindrical annulate. Temporal organs small with at least two short uplifted extensions. Head cuticle glabrous. - +Description. Length. (0.51-)0.58 mm. Head (Fig. 61). Tergal and lateral sides with 26 setae arranged as in Fig. 61; transversal rows indistinct laterally. Setae longest in posteromedian part; all but lateral setae clavate, shortly pubescent, lateral group setae cylindrical annulate. Temporal organs small with at least two short uplifted extensions. Head cuticle glabrous. + Antennae (Fig. 62). Segment 4 with 4 cylindrical annulate setae; relative lengths: p=10, -p' +p' =11(-12), -p'' +p'' =4(-6), r=4. Tergal seta p 0.6 of the length of tergal branch t. The latter subcylindrical, (2.6-)2.9 times as long as wide, 0.9 of the length of sternal branch s. That branch thickest in distal third and with anterodistal corner somewhat more truncated than posterodistal corner; s (2.0-)2.1 times as long as greatest diameter, its seta q cylindrical striate, 0.5 of the length of s. Relative lengths of flagella (base segments included) and base segments: F1=100, bs1=8; F2=(65-)66, bs2=6; F3=72(-74), bs3=(7-)8. F1 3.1 times as long as t, F2 and F3 (1.9-)2.2 and (2.0-)2.3 times as long as s respectively. Distal calyces helmet-shaped, glabrous. Globulus g, (1.6-)1.8 times as long as greatest diameter, the latter (0.9-) as long as greatest diameter of t. Antenna glabrous. -Trunk (Figs 63-65). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 63) simple cylindrical blunt annulate; sublateral seta 1.2 times as long as submedian seta. Sternite process blunt-ended; appendages barrel-shaped with low caps; process and appendages glabrous. -Tergites (Figs 64, 65), I, V, VI entire, II, III, IV transversely and weakly 2-parted. Number of setae on tergites (holotype only, if two groups of values anterior and posterior groups of setae respectively): I 30, II 19+20, III 28+21, IV 25+19, V 20+13, VI 4+2. Setae bladder-shaped with short oblique-erect pubescence, setae lengthening posteriorly, those on VI (Fig. 65) about twice longer than those on I. Cuticle of tergites glabrous. -Bothriotricha (Figs 66, 67). Relative lengths: T1=100, T2=108(-110), T3=(122-)146, T4=(89-)113, T5=(140-)144. Axes simple, most proximally glabrous; proximal half of T3 (Fig. 66) strongly clavate with short pubescence arranged in dense whorls, distal half very thin; other bothriotricha (Fig. 67) with thin and curved axes; pubescence short oblique on proximal parts, erect distally. -Genital papillae (Fig. 68). Short, as long as wide, seta 0.5 of the length of papilla. -Legs (Figs 69, 70). All legs 5-segmented. Setae on coxa (Fig. 69) and trochanter of legs 1-9 simple, cylindrical annulate blunt, rudimentary secondary branch only on coxal setae of leg 2 in male. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 70) short, almost cylindrical, (2.9-)3.4 times as long as greatest diameter; setae short cylindrical annulate, proximal one 0.1 of the length of tarsus and (0.5-)0.6 of the length of distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. - +Trunk (Figs 63-65). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 63) simple cylindrical blunt annulate; sublateral seta 1.2 times as long as submedian seta. Sternite process blunt-ended; appendages barrel-shaped with low caps; process and appendages glabrous. +Tergites (Figs 64, 65), I, V, VI entire, II, III, IV transversely and weakly 2-parted. Number of setae on tergites (holotype only, if two groups of values anterior and posterior groups of setae respectively): I 30, II 19+20, III 28+21, IV 25+19, V 20+13, VI 4+2. Setae bladder-shaped with short oblique-erect pubescence, setae lengthening posteriorly, those on VI (Fig. 65) about twice longer than those on I. Cuticle of tergites glabrous. +Bothriotricha (Figs 66, 67). Relative lengths: T1=100, T2=108(-110), T3=(122-)146, T4=(89-)113, T5=(140-)144. Axes simple, most proximally glabrous; proximal half of T3 (Fig. 66) strongly clavate with short pubescence arranged in dense whorls, distal half very thin; other bothriotricha (Fig. 67) with thin and curved axes; pubescence short oblique on proximal parts, erect distally. +Genital papillae (Fig. 68). Short, as long as wide, seta 0.5 of the length of papilla. +Legs (Figs 69, 70). All legs 5-segmented. Setae on coxa (Fig. 69) and trochanter of legs 1-9 simple, cylindrical annulate blunt, rudimentary secondary branch only on coxal setae of leg 2 in male. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 70) short, almost cylindrical, (2.9-)3.4 times as long as greatest diameter; setae short cylindrical annulate, proximal one 0.1 of the length of tarsus and (0.5-)0.6 of the length of distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. + Pygidium (Fig. 71). Tergum. Hind margin rounded. Relative lengths of setae: a1=10, a2=(13-)14, a3=(22-)25, st rudimentary. a1 bladder-shaped, faintly pubescent, a2 longish clavate, distinctly pubescent, somewhat curved inward, a3 thin tapering, faintly striate, curved inward. Distance a1-a1 1.5 times as long as a1, distance a1-a2 twice longer than distance a2-a3; distance -st-st +st-st ≈25 times as long as st and 0.6 of distance a1-a1. - + Sternum. Posterior margin between b1 rounded but with large lobe below anal plate; lobe with median indentation and rounded posterolateral corners. Relative -lengths +lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1=(40-)43, b2=13(-16), b3=7. b1 thin tapering, blunt, striate distally, b2 and b3 cylindrical. b1 (1.3-)1.4 times as long as distance b1-b1, b2 0.7(-0.9) of distance b1-b2 and b3 0.3(-0.4) of distance b3-b3. -Anal plate (Fig. 71) narrowest anteriorly, triangular, posterolateral corner turned anteriorly and posterior margin with small median process, two cylindrical blunt faintly pubescent appendages protruding backward from sternal side just nearby the posteromedian process, length of appendages somewhat longer than plate. - - +Anal plate (Fig. 71) narrowest anteriorly, triangular, posterolateral corner turned anteriorly and posterior margin with small median process, two cylindrical blunt faintly pubescent appendages protruding backward from sternal side just nearby the posteromedian process, length of appendages somewhat longer than plate. + + Figures 61-71. -Borneopauropus platylopas +Borneopauropus platylopas , sp. n., holotype, ad. 9(♂) 61 head, median and right part, tergal view 62 right antenna, tergal view 63 collum segment, median and left part, sternal view 64 tergites I-II, right half 65 tergite VI, right half 66T3 67T2 68 genital papillae and seta on coxa of leg 2, anterior view 69 seta on coxa of leg 9 70 tarsus of leg 9 71 pygidium, posterior part, tergal view. Scale: a: Figs 64, 65; b: Figs 66-70; c: Fig. 61; d: 62, 63; e: 71. diff --git a/data/96/EE/80/96EE80006B966608CBBE6723EFD48FE0.xml b/data/96/EE/80/96EE80006B966608CBBE6723EFD48FE0.xml index b5fabeece5c..8720e59cb90 100644 --- a/data/96/EE/80/96EE80006B966608CBBE6723EFD48FE0.xml +++ b/data/96/EE/80/96EE80006B966608CBBE6723EFD48FE0.xml @@ -1,94 +1,94 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - - -Lycocerus + + + + +Lycocerus swampingatus (Pic, 1916) -comb. n. +comb. n. Figs 19−21 - - -Cantharis swampingata -Pic 1916 + + +Cantharis swampingata +Pic 1916 : 4. - -Type material examined. - -Cantharis swampingata + +Type material examined. + +Cantharis swampingata : Holotype ♂ (MNHN): [p]"Swamping \ China", [h]"swampingata \ Pic", [h]"n. sp.", [h]"Lycocerus \ swampingatus(Pic) \ det. Y. X. Yang, 2009", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" . - - -Distribution + + +Distribution . -China (Sichuan). +China (Sichuan). - -Remarks. - + +Remarks. + The type specimen of this species was damaged seriously, lacking the abdomen, thorax, all legs, one elytron and part of head, but its aedeagus has been kept well, of which dorsal plates of parameres are separated (Figs 19−21), which is a diagnostic character of -Lycocerus +Lycocerus (Okushima, 2005). This species is similar to -Lycocerus canthariformis +Lycocerus canthariformis (Ishida, 1986) (located in Japan) in the pronotum, which is rounded, wider than long, lateral margins are arcuate and posterior angles rounded, but the aedeagus is differs from that of the latter. Also, it is related to -Lycocerus pubicollis +Lycocerus pubicollis (Heyden, 1889) in the aedeagus, but obviously different from the latter in the pronotum. Consequently, we suggest the following new combination: -Lycocerus swampingatus +Lycocerus swampingatus (Pic, 1916), comb. n. diff --git a/data/9A/7D/F4/9A7DF495F183598784DAE54C9A070143.xml b/data/9A/7D/F4/9A7DF495F183598784DAE54C9A070143.xml index bfeaf73294f..953ff12b87b 100644 --- a/data/9A/7D/F4/9A7DF495F183598784DAE54C9A070143.xml +++ b/data/9A/7D/F4/9A7DF495F183598784DAE54C9A070143.xml @@ -1,87 +1,87 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba oteroi Zayas, 1952 + + + +Stoiba oteroi Zayas, 1952 - - -Stoiba oteroi -Zayas 1952 + + +Stoiba oteroi +Zayas 1952 : 72 [original description includes figure]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Borowiec 1999 +Borowiec 1999 : 131 [catalog]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 106 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Type material. -Unknown. + +Type material. +Unknown. - -Type locality. -Cuba: Villa Clara, Lomas de Trinidad. + +Type locality. +Cuba: Villa Clara, Lomas de Trinidad. - -Description - + +Description + (from original description by -Zayas 1952 +Zayas 1952 ). Adult length 8.0 mm, width 7.0 mm. Body flattened, rounded, slightly steel black with antennae, head, margin area of pronotum, and legs (except basal half of femora) dull yellow. Head with anterior half visible in dorsal view; antennae short, yellow, brighter distally; eyes black; mandible and palpi ferruginous at apex. Pronotum small, narrow, and short with discal area widely dark stained and with strongly marked longitudinal groove medially; surface sparsely and coarsely punctate, more punctate medially extending posteriorly. Scutellum shiny black. Elytra dark stained as on pronotum, symmetrically and deeply punctured with external margins slightly expanded and declined. Hind wing fully developed. Legs dull yellow with tips of tibiae and femora black. - -Distribution. -Cuba: Prov. Villa Clara. + +Distribution. +Cuba: Prov. Villa Clara. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/9B/04/2F/9B042F861CE013EF2E4E170F1D47016D.xml b/data/9B/04/2F/9B042F861CE013EF2E4E170F1D47016D.xml index 7d91ed502bc..331588102cd 100644 --- a/data/9B/04/2F/9B042F861CE013EF2E4E170F1D47016D.xml +++ b/data/9B/04/2F/9B042F861CE013EF2E4E170F1D47016D.xml @@ -1,150 +1,150 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - -Themus (Telephorops) uniformis Wittmer, 1983 -stat. n. + + + +Themus (Telephorops) uniformis Wittmer, 1983 +stat. n. Figs 1-2 - - -Themus + + +Themus (s.str.) bitinctus uniformis -Wittmer 1983a +Wittmer 1983a : 218, fig. 30. - -Themus + +Themus (s.str.) cribripennis -Wittmer 1983b +Wittmer 1983b : 151, figs. 46, 49. - -Themus (Telephorops) bitinctus uniformis + +Themus (Telephorops) bitinctus uniformis : - -Svihla + +Svihla 2008 : 187. - -Themus (Telephorops) cribripennis + +Themus (Telephorops) cribripennis : - -Svihla + +Svihla 2008 : 187. syn. n. - -Type material examined. - -Themus + +Type material examined. + +Themus (s.str.) bitinctus uniformis: Holotype ♂ (NHMB): [p]"Yen-ping, China \ VII.21. 1917 \ Ac. 5148", [h]"bitinctus \ uniformis", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" , [p]"Naturhist. \ Museum Basel \ coll. W. Wittmer", [p]"CANTHARIDAE \ CANTH00000449". - -Themus + +Themus (s.str.) cribripennis: Holotype ♂ (MNHN): [p]"Taihorinsho \ Formosa \ Sauter, VIII_ 7_09", [h]"Cantharis \ davidis Fairm.", [h]"Themus (s.str.) \ cribripennis \ Wittm. \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" , [h] -"136" +"136" . Paratype: 1♀ (NHMB): [p]"Suisharyo \ Formosa \ H. Sauter, X.1911", [h]"Themus s.str. \ cribripennis \ Wittm. \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"PARATYPUS" +"PARATYPUS" , [p]"CANTHARIDAE \ CANTH00002654". - - + + Figures 1-9. Habitus, dorsal view 1 Holotype of -Themus +Themus (s.str.) bitinctus uniformis Wittmer, 1983 2 Holotype of -Themus +Themus (s.str.) cribripennis Wittmer, 1983 3 Holotype of -Themus licenti +Themus licenti Pic, 1938 4 Holotype of -Telephorus coriaceipennis +Telephorus coriaceipennis Fairmaire, 1889 5 Lectotype of -Podabrus aenescens +Podabrus aenescens Fairmaire, 1889 6 Holotype of -Cantharis tcheonana +Cantharis tcheonana Pic, 1922 7 Holotype of -Athemus (Isathemus) bilineatus +Athemus (Isathemus) bilineatus Wittmer, 19958 Holotype of -Athemus +Athemus (s.str.) amplus Wittmer, 1995 9 Holotype of -Telephorus dimidiaticrus +Telephorus dimidiaticrus Fairmaire, 1889. 1-2, 5, 7-8, 9 male 3-4, 6 female. - -Distribution. -China (Fujian, Taiwan). + +Distribution. +China (Fujian, Taiwan). - -Remarks. - + +Remarks. + Having examined the holotypes of -Themus cribripennis +Themus cribripennis Wittmer, 1983b and -Themus bitinctus uniformis +Themus bitinctus uniformis Wittmer, 1983a, we were unable to find differences justifying their separation, which has led us to consider all the examined specimens of both nominal species to be conspecific. Therefore, we synonymized -Themus cribripennis +Themus cribripennis under -Themus bitinctus uniformis +Themus bitinctus uniformis . Furthermore, -Themus bitinctus uniformis +Themus bitinctus uniformis should be upgraded to the specific rank, because it is obviously different from -Themus bitinctus +Themus bitinctus Wittmer, 1982 (located in Vietnam) in the aedeagus, except the difference in the elytra coloration from the latter. diff --git a/data/9C/AE/39/9CAE398623FC5236F5DDD2285C26E16F.xml b/data/9C/AE/39/9CAE398623FC5236F5DDD2285C26E16F.xml index 437e6fde36a..42131c6cc29 100644 --- a/data/9C/AE/39/9CAE398623FC5236F5DDD2285C26E16F.xml +++ b/data/9C/AE/39/9CAE398623FC5236F5DDD2285C26E16F.xml @@ -1,130 +1,130 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba indivisa Blake, 1930 + + + +Stoiba indivisa Blake, 1930 Figures 729-31 - - -Stoiba indivisa -Blake 1930 + + +Stoiba indivisa +Blake 1930 : 218 [original description including figure]; -Blackwelder 1946 +Blackwelder 1946 : 743 [checklist]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Borowiec 1996 +Borowiec 1996 : 229 [faunistic record], -1999 +1999 : 131 [catalog]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 106 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Type material. -Holotype (Fig. 7) and paratype in USNM (Type No. 43116); paratype (AMNH with USNM label, Type No. 43116). + +Type material. +Holotype (Fig. 7) and paratype in USNM (Type No. 43116); paratype (AMNH with USNM label, Type No. 43116). - -Type locality. - + +Type locality. + Cuba: Prov. -Guantanamo +Guantanamo . - -Specimens examined. - + +Specimens examined. + Cuba: Prov. -Guantanamo +Guantanamo : WM Mann, 1918 (USNM: holotype, type No. 43116); June 22 1910, at light (AMNH: paratype, type No. 43116); ex H Rolle collection (MMUE: 1); ex Donckier collection (MMUE: 1); Prov. Santiago de Cuba: Alto de Cardero, Turquino, VI 1964, Zayas-Garcia (UWCP: 1). - -Diagnosis. - -Stoiba indivisa + +Diagnosis. + +Stoiba indivisa (Figs 29-31) is distinguished from -Stoiba bruneri +Stoiba bruneri by pale antennae, from -Stoiba clarildae +Stoiba clarildae by moderately convexprofile, and from -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis by hemispherical pronotum without anterior margin angle. It also differs by a more emarginate pronotum anterior margin than other species and by elytra dark blue (in naked eyes) to purple (under microscope) with posterior half of margin indistinct. - -Description. - + +Description. + Adult (n=5) length 6.5−6.7 mm, width 5.5−5.7 mm. Body (Figs 29-31) oval, widest at near middle in dorsal view. Head, antennae, pronotum, and legs brown with pro- and meso-femur proximal end black; meta-femur brown with proximal 1/3 black; elytra dark blue to purple and slightly opalescent. Head withdrawn into prothorax except entire eyes and epicranial suture exposed in dorsal view; inter-ocular area 2 times as broad as eye, slightly depressed medially; maxillary palpus (Fig. 60) and labial palpus -( +( Fig. 62) compact. Pronotum (Figs 7, 29) hemispherical, brown with base line black; base 2 times as broad as anterior edge; anterior edge moderately emarginate, anterior 2/3 of lateral edge gradually broader, curved at posterior 1/3; margin moderately defined, sparsely punctate. Procoxal process (Fig. 31) slightly convex, shiny, black. Scutellum triangular, shiny black. Elytra (Fig. 30) moderately convex with surface scale-like, shiny, finely and coarsely punctate; umbone moderately projected and angled; margin distinct in anterior half and vague in posterior half. Hind wing fully developed. Legs (Fig. 31) brown with coxae, trochanters, proximal end of pro- and mesofemur, proximal 1/3 metafemur black. - - + + Figures 29-37. Habitus. 29-31 -Stoiba indivisa +Stoiba indivisa 29 dorsal view 30 lateral view 31 ventral view 32-34 -Stoiba marginata +Stoiba marginata 32 dorsal view 33 lateral view 34 ventral view 35-37 -Stoiba nigricans +Stoiba nigricans 35 dorsal view 36 lateral view 37 ventral view (scale bar = 1.0 mm) - -Distribution. - + +Distribution. + Cuba: -Guantanamo +Guantanamo ; Santiago de Cuba. diff --git a/data/9C/B8/9E/9CB89EF02A4045ADD7E9588B797B101D.xml b/data/9C/B8/9E/9CB89EF02A4045ADD7E9588B797B101D.xml index a6729b97fb5..c5bc8225693 100644 --- a/data/9C/B8/9E/9CB89EF02A4045ADD7E9588B797B101D.xml +++ b/data/9C/B8/9E/9CB89EF02A4045ADD7E9588B797B101D.xml @@ -1,106 +1,106 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Samarangopus choanephorus -sp. n. + + + +Samarangopus choanephorus +sp. n. Figs 72-83 - -Material. -Holotype ad. 9(♂), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, below the top, primary rain forest, soil, alt. 2400 m, 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-195. - 1 specimen. + +Material. +Holotype ad. 9(♂), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, below the top, primary rain forest, soil, alt. 2400 m, 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-195. - 1 specimen. - -Etymology. -From the Greek choane, funnel, and phero, bear, carry (referring to the funnel-shaped organs on the tergites). + +Etymology. +From the Greek choane, funnel, and phero, bear, carry (referring to the funnel-shaped organs on the tergites). - -Diagnosis. - -Samarangopus choanephorus + +Diagnosis. + +Samarangopus choanephorus sp. n. may be grouped together with -Samarangopus umbonifer +Samarangopus umbonifer Scheller from Thailand ( -Scheller 1995 +Scheller 1995 ) and -Samarangopus condylus +Samarangopus condylus Scheller from the Philippines ( -Scheller 2009 +Scheller 2009 ), for certain more to the former than to the latter. Good distinguishing characters in relation to -Samarangopus umbonifer +Samarangopus umbonifer are the shape of the antennal globulus -g +g , stalk much longer than globulus in -Borneopauropus choanephorus +Borneopauropus choanephorus , shorter in -Borneopauropus umbonifer +Borneopauropus umbonifer , the large funnel-shaped organs of the tergites, with central rod, not without, the protuberances of the posterior margin of the tergite VI, with evenly convex lateral margins, not with a small knob on each side, the shape of the setae on coxa and trochanter of leg 9, simple, not furcate, and the length of the pygidial setae b3, almost as long as the b2, not distinctly shorter. - -Description. - + +Description. + Length. 0.74 mm. Antennae (Fig. 72). Chaetotaxy of segments 1-4: 2/2/2/2; no -g' +g' . Setae thin striate, on segment 4 only two proved, their relative lengths p=10, -p'or -p'' +p'or +p'' =6. Tergal branch t almost cylindrical, 3.1 times as wide as greatest diameter and as long as sternal branch s. That branch twice longer than greatest diameter, anterodistal corner distinctly truncate. Seta q as setae of 4th segment, 0.5 of the length of s. Relative lengths of flagella (base segments included) and base segments: F1=100, bs1=18, F2=?, bs2~10, F3=85, bs3=17. F1 5.6 times as long as t, F3 3.3 times as long as s. Calyces conical; flagella axes inconsiderably widened below calyx. Globulus g 1.6 times as long as greatest width; 10 thin bracts, capsule spherical, diameter of g 0.8 of the greatest diameter of t. Antenna glabrous. -Trunk (Figs 73-77). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 73) similar thin furcate, main branch pointed striate, secondary branch rudimentary pointed; sublateral setae 1.3 times as long as submedian setae. Sternite process broad triangular pointed anteriorly. Appendages wide cylindrical, caps flat. All parts of collum segment glabrous. -Tergites with four main types of protuberances (Figs 74-77): 1. stalked campanulate marginal protuberances (Figs 74-77), short on anterior margin of tergite I, larger on lateral margins of tergites; 2. fungiform organs (Figs 74-77) with hat in the shape of an upside down transparent funnel with a central rod, foot subcylindrical, these distributed over whole the surface of tergites; 3. small subcylindrical organs with upside down funnel at top (Fig. 77); 4. many small conical structures in between the different protuberances. Number of marginal protuberances: (holotype only): I - 36, II, 1 small - T1 - 11; III, 8 - T2 - 8; IV, 8 - T3 - 6; V, 9 - T4 - 4, VI, 7 - T5 - 1. - +Trunk (Figs 73-77). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 73) similar thin furcate, main branch pointed striate, secondary branch rudimentary pointed; sublateral setae 1.3 times as long as submedian setae. Sternite process broad triangular pointed anteriorly. Appendages wide cylindrical, caps flat. All parts of collum segment glabrous. +Tergites with four main types of protuberances (Figs 74-77): 1. stalked campanulate marginal protuberances (Figs 74-77), short on anterior margin of tergite I, larger on lateral margins of tergites; 2. fungiform organs (Figs 74-77) with hat in the shape of an upside down transparent funnel with a central rod, foot subcylindrical, these distributed over whole the surface of tergites; 3. small subcylindrical organs with upside down funnel at top (Fig. 77); 4. many small conical structures in between the different protuberances. Number of marginal protuberances: (holotype only): I - 36, II, 1 small - T1 - 11; III, 8 - T2 - 8; IV, 8 - T3 - 6; V, 9 - T4 - 4, VI, 7 - T5 - 1. + Bothriotricha. All but T3 with very thin axes, curved distally. T3 (Fig. 78) with thicker axes distally forming a subcylindrical, almost glabrous, swelling, length -1/4 +1/4 of the length of bothriotrix. Relative lengths of bothriotricha (holotype only): T1=100, T2=95, T3=42, T4≈90, T5=89. -Genital papillae (Fig. 79). Conical, glabrous, 2.2 times as long as greatest diameter, setae long, 0.8 of the length of papillae, inserted below the middle of papillae. -Legs (Figs 80, 81).All legs 5-segmented. Seta on coxa and trochanter (Fig. 80) of legs 1-9thin simple striate. Tarsi tapering, those of leg 9 (Fig. 81) 3.7 times as long as its greatest diameter; two tergal setae, both pointed glabrous; length of proximal one 0.4 of the length of tarsus and 3 times longer than distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. No proximal seta on tarsi of leg 1. All legs with large main claw and small setose anterior secondary claw; in leg 9 the former reaching 0.5 of the length of tarsus. Appendage on femur of leg 1 not studied. - +Genital papillae (Fig. 79). Conical, glabrous, 2.2 times as long as greatest diameter, setae long, 0.8 of the length of papillae, inserted below the middle of papillae. +Legs (Figs 80, 81).All legs 5-segmented. Seta on coxa and trochanter (Fig. 80) of legs 1-9thin simple striate. Tarsi tapering, those of leg 9 (Fig. 81) 3.7 times as long as its greatest diameter; two tergal setae, both pointed glabrous; length of proximal one 0.4 of the length of tarsus and 3 times longer than distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. No proximal seta on tarsi of leg 1. All legs with large main claw and small setose anterior secondary claw; in leg 9 the former reaching 0.5 of the length of tarsus. Appendage on femur of leg 1 not studied. + Pygidium (Figs 82, 83). Tergum. Posterior margin undulate with larger pentagonal lobe between st. Setae a1 cylindrical, curved inward, converging, a2 short clavate straight -converging +converging , faintly pubescent distally, a3 long thin tapering pointed diverging, st straight lanceolate, faintly pubescent. Relative lengths of setae: a1=10, a2=6(-7), a3=(20-)21, st=(15-)16. Distance a1-a1 1.3 times as long as a1, distance a1-a2 as long as distance a2 -a3; distance st-st almost as long as st and 1.1 times as long as distance a1-a1. Cuticle glabrous. -Sternum (Fig 83). Posterior margin rounded. Setae long tapering pointed, b2 straight diverging, b3 somewhat curved inward. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1=(45-)47, b2=(26-)29, b3=24(-25). b1 1.1 times as long as interdistance, b2 1.1 times as long as distance b1-b2, b3 0.6 of interdistance. -Anal plate (Fig. 82) 1.4 times as long as broad, lateral margins convex, distal part of plate cleft by a V-shaped incision into two somewhat tapering cylindrical branches; four appendages: each branch provided with one outer and one inner tooth and in between a straight bladder-shaped appendage, that broadest in distal half, length of appendage 0.4 of the length of plate; two short thin cylindrical appendages protruding outward-backward from lateral margins. Plate glabrous, appendages with faint pubescence. - - +Sternum (Fig 83). Posterior margin rounded. Setae long tapering pointed, b2 straight diverging, b3 somewhat curved inward. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1=(45-)47, b2=(26-)29, b3=24(-25). b1 1.1 times as long as interdistance, b2 1.1 times as long as distance b1-b2, b3 0.6 of interdistance. +Anal plate (Fig. 82) 1.4 times as long as broad, lateral margins convex, distal part of plate cleft by a V-shaped incision into two somewhat tapering cylindrical branches; four appendages: each branch provided with one outer and one inner tooth and in between a straight bladder-shaped appendage, that broadest in distal half, length of appendage 0.4 of the length of plate; two short thin cylindrical appendages protruding outward-backward from lateral margins. Plate glabrous, appendages with faint pubescence. + + Figures 72-83. -Samarangopus choanephorus +Samarangopus choanephorus sp. n., holotype ad. 9(♂) 72 left antenna, sternal view 73 collum segment, median and left part 74 tergite I, anterolateral margin with campanulate protuberances and fungiform organs 75 tergite I, posterolateral corner 76 tergite IV, right lateral margin around insertion pit of T3 77 tergite VI, right posterolateral part 78T3 79 genital papillae, anterior view 80 seta on trochanter of leg 9 81 tarsus of leg 9 82 pygidial tergum, posterior part, tergal view 83 pygidial sternum, sternal view. Scale: a: Fig. 79; b: Figs 74-76; c: Figs 72, 73, 77, 78, 80, 81; d: Figs 82, 83. diff --git a/data/A3/B5/BA/A3B5BA113DB394728409CBA14C716C74.xml b/data/A3/B5/BA/A3B5BA113DB394728409CBA14C716C74.xml index 664314c16d1..43ef86784d9 100644 --- a/data/A3/B5/BA/A3B5BA113DB394728409CBA14C716C74.xml +++ b/data/A3/B5/BA/A3B5BA113DB394728409CBA14C716C74.xml @@ -1,119 +1,119 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba bruneri Blake, 1930 + + + +Stoiba bruneri Blake, 1930 Figures 314-16 - - -Stoiba bruneri -Blake 1930 + + +Stoiba bruneri +Blake 1930 : 219 [original description including figure]; -Blackwelder 1946 +Blackwelder 1946 : 743 [checklist]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Borowiec 1999 +Borowiec 1999 : 130 [catalog]; -Chaboo 2000 +Chaboo 2000 : 379 [outgroup in phylogenetic analysis]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 105 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Type material. -Holotype (Fig. 3) and four paratypes in USNM (Type No. 43117). + +Type material. +Holotype (Fig. 3) and four paratypes in USNM (Type No. 43117). - -Type locality. - + +Type locality. + Cuba: Prov. -Guantanamo +Guantanamo : Sierra Maestra Palma Mocha 1386 m. - -Specimens examined. - + +Specimens examined. + Cuba: Prov. -Guantanamo +Guantanamo : Sierra Maestra July 10-20 1922, CH Ballou, SC Bruner, Palma Mocha 1386 m. (USNM: holotype, male; paratype, type No. 43117); Sierra Maestra 900-1200 m, July 10-20 1922, CH Ballou, SC Bruner, EEA. de Cuba, No. 9355, (USNM: paratype, type No. 43117); Sierra Maestra July 10-20 1922, CH Ballou, SC Bruner, 4000-5000 ft. EEA. de Cuba, No. 9355, (USNM: 2 paratypes, type No. 43117); Sierra Maestra, Pico Joaquin, 5300 ft. May 18 1948, J Ferras (USNM: 1 female, MCZ: 1). - -Diagnosis. - -Stoiba bruneri + +Diagnosis. + +Stoiba bruneri (Figs 14-16) is similar to -Stoiba clarildae +Stoiba clarildae , -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis and -Stoiba indivisa +Stoiba indivisa but it is mainly distinguished by the black antennomere XI and more rounded lateral edge of the pronotum. It is also distinguished from -Stoiba clarildae +Stoiba clarildae by its shiny black scutellum and brachypterous hind wing and from -Stoiba indivisa +Stoiba indivisa by the distinct posterior half of the elytral margin and brachypterous hind wing. - -Description. -Adult (n=7) length 7.0-8.5 mm, width 7.0-8.5 mm. Body (Fig. 14-16) rounded, as long as wide, discontinuous between pronotum and elytra, broadest at anterior 1/3 of elytra in dorsal view; profile moderately convex, highest at middle. Antennae pale with antennomere XI black; antennomere III slightly broader apically, almost as long as IV (Fig. 48). Mandible (Fig. 58) with 5 teeth; maxillary palpus (Fig. 60) and labial palpus (Fig. 62) compact. Pronotum (Fig. 14) brown to dark brown, hemispherical with anterior margin slightly emarginate, laterally rounded, slightly convex with surface smooth; margin area distinct in anterior half, vague in posterior half, shallowly and sparsely punctate. Elytra (Fig. 15) moderately convex, blue to dark blue, finely and moderately punctate, broadest at anterior 1/3; margin area distinctly narrower posteriorly, not extending to terminal end. Spermatheca (Fig. 73) falcate with two openings, receptacle 0.5 times as long as pump. + +Description. +Adult (n=7) length 7.0-8.5 mm, width 7.0-8.5 mm. Body (Fig. 14-16) rounded, as long as wide, discontinuous between pronotum and elytra, broadest at anterior 1/3 of elytra in dorsal view; profile moderately convex, highest at middle. Antennae pale with antennomere XI black; antennomere III slightly broader apically, almost as long as IV (Fig. 48). Mandible (Fig. 58) with 5 teeth; maxillary palpus (Fig. 60) and labial palpus (Fig. 62) compact. Pronotum (Fig. 14) brown to dark brown, hemispherical with anterior margin slightly emarginate, laterally rounded, slightly convex with surface smooth; margin area distinct in anterior half, vague in posterior half, shallowly and sparsely punctate. Elytra (Fig. 15) moderately convex, blue to dark blue, finely and moderately punctate, broadest at anterior 1/3; margin area distinctly narrower posteriorly, not extending to terminal end. Spermatheca (Fig. 73) falcate with two openings, receptacle 0.5 times as long as pump. - -Distribution. - + +Distribution. + Cuba: Prov. -Guantanamo +Guantanamo . diff --git a/data/A7/1B/59/A71B593DFB005E7CA473E410D994E813.xml b/data/A7/1B/59/A71B593DFB005E7CA473E410D994E813.xml index 1345389fad2..d7a5cbcf7ab 100644 --- a/data/A7/1B/59/A71B593DFB005E7CA473E410D994E813.xml +++ b/data/A7/1B/59/A71B593DFB005E7CA473E410D994E813.xml @@ -1,112 +1,112 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba lurida (Suffrian, 1868) + + + +Stoiba lurida (Suffrian, 1868) - - -Chelymorpha lurida -Suffrian 1868 + + +Chelymorpha lurida +Suffrian 1868 : 240 [original description]; -Gemminger and Harold 1876 +Gemminger and Harold 1876 : 3640 [catalog]; -Leng and Mutchler 1914 +Leng and Mutchler 1914 : 458 [list of the West Indies -Coleoptera +Coleoptera ]; -Spaeth 1914 +Spaeth 1914 : 59 [catalog]; -Blackwelder 1946 +Blackwelder 1946 : 745 [checklist]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 152 [checklist]. - -Stoiba lurida + +Stoiba lurida : -Borowiec 1999 +Borowiec 1999 : 131 [catalog]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 106 [checklist-misspelled]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Type material. -Unknown + +Type material. +Unknown - -Type locality. - -"Cuba" + +Type locality. + +"Cuba" - -Description - + +Description + (from original description by -Suffrian 1868 +Suffrian 1868 ). Adult length 9.0 mm, width 7.4 mm. -Stoiba lurida +Stoiba lurida is generally similar to large size of -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis , but -Stoiba lurida +Stoiba lurida shows brownish yellow pronotum when it is dried and shows gold shimmering in fresh specimens; pronotal and elytral margins more coarsely and roughly punctate. Sometimes it was identified as -Calligrapha spiraeae +Calligrapha spiraeae (Say) in North America. Body slightly oval, convex, broadest within anterior half of elytra, dark reddish brown, opalescent with punctures on lateral margins of pronotum and elytra. Pronotum with posterior margin broad, flat; disc finely and sparsely punctate, lateral margin slightly more punctate. Elytra with posterior half of lateral margin not clearly explanate; lateral decline margin area slightly more punctate than raised edge area. Ventral surface (abdomen) brownish yellow to reddish yellow. - -Distribution. - -"Cuba" + +Distribution. + +"Cuba" diff --git a/data/A9/6B/29/A96B29BD4D6A4B872473C877B0932857.xml b/data/A9/6B/29/A96B29BD4D6A4B872473C877B0932857.xml index 5acb0f89e2c..e64d114b6cf 100644 --- a/data/A9/6B/29/A96B29BD4D6A4B872473C877B0932857.xml +++ b/data/A9/6B/29/A96B29BD4D6A4B872473C877B0932857.xml @@ -1,85 +1,85 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Decapauropus anatonus -sp. n. + + + +Decapauropus anatonus +sp. n. Figs 36-45 - -Material. -Holotype ad. 9(♂), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, below the top, primary rain forest, litter, alt. 2400 m, 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-210. + +Material. +Holotype ad. 9(♂), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, below the top, primary rain forest, litter, alt. 2400 m, 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-210. - -Etymology. -From the Latin anatonus, extending upward (referring to the shape of the distal part of the bracts of the antennal globulus g). + +Etymology. +From the Latin anatonus, extending upward (referring to the shape of the distal part of the bracts of the antennal globulus g). - -Diagnosis. - + +Diagnosis. + There are some species with resembling though not identical anal plates but -Decapauropus anatonus +Decapauropus anatonus sp. n. is well defined by the shape of the antennal globulus g with slender stalk and distal parts of the bract turned upward, this also combined with a distal swelling on the bothriotricha T3. At present its relationships are not possible to trace. - -Description. -Length. 0.43 mm. Head (Fig. 36). Setae on the tergal side subcylindrical striate. Relative lengths of setae, 1st row: a1=a2=10; 2nd row: a1=10, a2=14, a3=20; 3rd row: a1=11, a2=?; 4th row: a1=10, a2=17, a3=24, a4=13; lateral group setae not studied. Ratio a1/a1-a1 in 1st row 1.4, 2nd row 0.5, 3rd row 1.3, 4th row 1.2. Temporal organs in tergal view ovoid, length 0.8 of their shortest interdistance. Head cuticle glabrous. - + +Description. +Length. 0.43 mm. Head (Fig. 36). Setae on the tergal side subcylindrical striate. Relative lengths of setae, 1st row: a1=a2=10; 2nd row: a1=10, a2=14, a3=20; 3rd row: a1=11, a2=?; 4th row: a1=10, a2=17, a3=24, a4=13; lateral group setae not studied. Ratio a1/a1-a1 in 1st row 1.4, 2nd row 0.5, 3rd row 1.3, 4th row 1.2. Temporal organs in tergal view ovoid, length 0.8 of their shortest interdistance. Head cuticle glabrous. + Antennae (Fig. 37). Segment 4 with at least three cylindrical striate setae; their relative lengths: p=10, -p' +p' =r=7. Tergal seta p 1.5 times as long as tergal branch t. The latter fusiform, twice longer than its greatest diameter and 0.7 of the length of sternal branchs,that branch 1.8 times as long as its greatest diameter; anterodistal corner distinctly truncate. Seta q cylindrical striate, 0.6 of the length of s. Relative lengths of flagella not available for study; F1 long, distal calyces flattened, distal part of flagella axes inconsiderably widened below calyx. F1 6.2 times as long as t. Globulus g pyriform, proportionally long, 1.7 times as long as the greatest diameter, stalk as long as globulus, bracts thin, turned upward distally, ≈10 bracts, capsule with flattened bottom, width of g 0.8 of the greatest diameter of t. Antennae glabrous. -Trunk (Figs 38, 39). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 38) simple cylindrical striate, sublateral setae 1.3 times as long as submedian setae; sternal process blunt anteriorly, lateral margins concave; caps low, roundly conical. Process and appendages glabrous. -Tergite I incompletely divided transversally; setae on tergites as setae on the head, 4+4 setae on tergite I and 4+2 on VI, interposed tergites not studied. Submedian posterior setae on VI (Fig. 39) 0.5 of interdistance and 0.8 of the length of pygidial setae a1. -Genital papillae (Fig. 40). Conical, 1.9 times as long as the greatest diameter, seta thin, 0.5 of the length of papilla. -Bothriotricha (Fig. 41). Relative lengths: T1=100, T2=?, T3=112, T4=140, T5=157; axes simple straight, very thin and with faint pubescence only distally, T3 (Fig. 41) strongest, with narrowly ovoid end-swelling and with distinct oblique pubescence on swelling and just below it. - +Trunk (Figs 38, 39). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 38) simple cylindrical striate, sublateral setae 1.3 times as long as submedian setae; sternal process blunt anteriorly, lateral margins concave; caps low, roundly conical. Process and appendages glabrous. +Tergite I incompletely divided transversally; setae on tergites as setae on the head, 4+4 setae on tergite I and 4+2 on VI, interposed tergites not studied. Submedian posterior setae on VI (Fig. 39) 0.5 of interdistance and 0.8 of the length of pygidial setae a1. +Genital papillae (Fig. 40). Conical, 1.9 times as long as the greatest diameter, seta thin, 0.5 of the length of papilla. +Bothriotricha (Fig. 41). Relative lengths: T1=100, T2=?, T3=112, T4=140, T5=157; axes simple straight, very thin and with faint pubescence only distally, T3 (Fig. 41) strongest, with narrowly ovoid end-swelling and with distinct oblique pubescence on swelling and just below it. + Legs (Figs 42, 43). Setae on coxa and trochanter (Fig. 42) of legs 1-9 simple cylindrical striate. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 43) tapering, 3.6 times as long as its greatest dia -meter +meter ; proximal seta very thin tapering, distal seta cylindrical blunt striate, proximal one 0.2 of the length of tarsus and 1.2 times as long as the length of distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. -Pygidium (Fig. 44, 45). Tergum. Posterior margin rounded and with shallow lobe between st. Relative lengths of setae: a1=10, a2=8, a3=17, st=6; setae thin, directed posteriorly, a-setae tapering pointed, curved inward, st cylindrical blunt. Distance a1-a1 0.6 of the length of a1, distance a1-a2 1.8 times as long as a2-a3; distance st-st 1.8 times as long st and twice longer than distance a1-a1. -Sternum. Posterior margin rounded and with very small posterior lobe below anal plate. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1=32, b2=8, setae thin tapering, striate, b1 1.3 times as long as interdistance, b2 0.5 of distance b1-b2. -Anal plate directed posteriorly, as long as broad, lateral margins convex, posterior margin with shallow incision, posterodistal corners lengthened into two clavate appendages, these 0.7 of the length of plate; plate glabrous. - - +Pygidium (Fig. 44, 45). Tergum. Posterior margin rounded and with shallow lobe between st. Relative lengths of setae: a1=10, a2=8, a3=17, st=6; setae thin, directed posteriorly, a-setae tapering pointed, curved inward, st cylindrical blunt. Distance a1-a1 0.6 of the length of a1, distance a1-a2 1.8 times as long as a2-a3; distance st-st 1.8 times as long st and twice longer than distance a1-a1. +Sternum. Posterior margin rounded and with very small posterior lobe below anal plate. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1=32, b2=8, setae thin tapering, striate, b1 1.3 times as long as interdistance, b2 0.5 of distance b1-b2. +Anal plate directed posteriorly, as long as broad, lateral margins convex, posterior margin with shallow incision, posterodistal corners lengthened into two clavate appendages, these 0.7 of the length of plate; plate glabrous. + + Figures 36-45. -Decapauropus antanosus +Decapauropus antanosus sp. n., holotype, ad. 9(♂) 36 head, median and right part 37 right antenna, tergal view 38 collum segment, median and left part, sternal view 39 tergite VI, posterior part 40 genital papillae, anterior view 41T3 42 seta on trochanter of leg 9 43 tarsus of leg 9 44 pygidium, posteromedian and right part, tergal view 45 anal plate, lateral view. Scale: a: Fig. 41; b: 36, 38, 40, 42, 43; c: 37, 39, 44, 45. diff --git a/data/AB/4F/34/AB4F3453D48C197ED4BD12A27A6C33CC.xml b/data/AB/4F/34/AB4F3453D48C197ED4BD12A27A6C33CC.xml index e04d4e7d35f..1a90a88ccbe 100644 --- a/data/AB/4F/34/AB4F3453D48C197ED4BD12A27A6C33CC.xml +++ b/data/AB/4F/34/AB4F3453D48C197ED4BD12A27A6C33CC.xml @@ -1,152 +1,152 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - -Lycocerus fairmairei Y. Yang & X. Yang -nom. n. et stat. rev. + + + +Lycocerus fairmairei Y. Yang & X. Yang +nom. n. et stat. rev. Figs 9, 19−21, 23 - - -Telephorus dimidiaticrus -Fairmaire 1889 + + +Telephorus dimidiaticrus +Fairmaire 1889 : 41. - -Athemus dimidiaticrus + +Athemus dimidiaticrus : -Wittmer 1972a +Wittmer 1972a : 106. [Synonymized with -Athemus orientalis +Athemus orientalis (Gorham, 1889) by -Wittmer 1995 +Wittmer 1995 : 255. Secondary homonym, preoccupied by -Lycocerus dimidiaticrus +Lycocerus dimidiaticrus (Fairmaire, 1889: 40), originally in -Podabrus +Podabrus .] - -Lycocerus orientalis + +Lycocerus orientalis (Gorham, 1889): -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 : 252. - -Type material examined. - -Telephorus dimidiaticrus + +Type material examined. + +Telephorus dimidiaticrus : Holotype ♂ (MNHN): [h]"Telephorus \ dimidiaticrus \ Fairm. \ Koui -Tcheou" +Tcheou" , [h]"Athemus \ prattianus \ (Gorh.) \ det. W. Wittmer", [h]"Lycocerus \ dimidiaticrus (Fairm.) \ det. Y. X. Yang, 2009", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" . - -Additional material examined. -CHINA: Fujian: 1♂ (NHMB): "Fukien. Kuatun, 22.IV.1946"; 1♂ (NHMB): same locality, 1.V.1946; 1♀ (NHMB): same locality, 2.V.1946; 1♀ (IZAS): Jianyang, Huangkeng, Aotou, 950m, 5.V.1960, leg. Yong Zuo; 1♂ (IZAS): same locality, 800−1050m, 26.IV.1960, leg. Cheng-Lin Ma. + +Additional material examined. +CHINA: Fujian: 1♂ (NHMB): "Fukien. Kuatun, 22.IV.1946"; 1♂ (NHMB): same locality, 1.V.1946; 1♀ (NHMB): same locality, 2.V.1946; 1♀ (IZAS): Jianyang, Huangkeng, Aotou, 950m, 5.V.1960, leg. Yong Zuo; 1♂ (IZAS): same locality, 800−1050m, 26.IV.1960, leg. Cheng-Lin Ma. - - -Distribution + + +Distribution . -China (Fujian, Guizhou). +China (Fujian, Guizhou). - -Etymology. -The new name is named after L. Fairmaire, the taxonomist who described this species. + +Etymology. +The new name is named after L. Fairmaire, the taxonomist who described this species. - -Remarks. - + +Remarks. + Fairmaire described a -Podabrus dimidiaticrus +Podabrus dimidiaticrus Fairmaire, 1889: 40 which became -Athemellus dimidiaticrus +Athemellus dimidiaticrus by -Wittmer (1972b) +Wittmer (1972b) and now -Lycocerus dimidiaticrus +Lycocerus dimidiaticrus (Fairmaire, 1889), which however was neglected by -Kazantsev and Brancucci (2007) +Kazantsev and Brancucci (2007) , and in the same original publication also a -Telephorus dimidiaticrus +Telephorus dimidiaticrus Fairmaire, 1889: 41 which became -Athemus dimidiaticrus +Athemus dimidiaticrus by -Wittmer (1972a) +Wittmer (1972a) and now to be placed in -Lycocerus +Lycocerus , the two species become secondary homonyms and the junior is invalid (ICZN, 4th, article 57.31.), so that a new name is needed, -Lycocerus fairmairei +Lycocerus fairmairei nom. n., to replace the name of the latter species. - + At the same time, having examined the holotype of -Telephorus dimidiaticrus +Telephorus dimidiaticrus and lectotype of -Lycocerus orientalis +Lycocerus orientalis (Gorham, 1889) (1♂ (NHMB): [p]"Foochau \ April, 1886 \ Leech.", [h]"A. orientalis", [p] -"LECTOTYPE" +"LECTOTYPE" , [p]"CANTHARIDAE \ CANTH00001609".), we found that the formeris distinctly different from the latter in the aedeagus (Figs 19−21; the -latter's +latter's , see -Wittmer 1995 +Wittmer 1995 : figs. 109, 110), so we suggest -Telephorus dimidiaticrus +Telephorus dimidiaticrus Fairmaire, 1889: 41, with its new replacement name -Lycocerus fairmairei +Lycocerus fairmairei nom. n., to be resurrected from synonymy with -Lycocerus orientalis +Lycocerus orientalis . diff --git a/data/AF/E1/B9/AFE1B97E2B5405E2145B3C1194AED4BC.xml b/data/AF/E1/B9/AFE1B97E2B5405E2145B3C1194AED4BC.xml index f399f10dcad..299e13053b6 100644 --- a/data/AF/E1/B9/AFE1B97E2B5405E2145B3C1194AED4BC.xml +++ b/data/AF/E1/B9/AFE1B97E2B5405E2145B3C1194AED4BC.xml @@ -1,98 +1,98 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Decapauropus capillaris -sp. n. + + + +Decapauropus capillaris +sp. n. Figs 10-19 - -Material. -Holotype ad. 9(♂), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-080. - Paratypes: 3 ad. 9 (2♀, 1♂), same data as holotype. - 4 specimens. + +Material. +Holotype ad. 9(♂), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-080. - Paratypes: 3 ad. 9 (2♀, 1♂), same data as holotype. - 4 specimens. - -Etymology. -From the Latin capillaris, slender as a hair (referring to the thin setae). + +Etymology. +From the Latin capillaris, slender as a hair (referring to the thin setae). - -Diagnosis. - -Decapauropus capillaris + +Diagnosis. + +Decapauropus capillaris shows striking resemblances to -Decapauropus virgininsularis +Decapauropus virgininsularis Scheller ( -Scheller 1990 +Scheller 1990 ) from the U.S. Virgin Islands. They can be distinguished by the shape of the tergal antennal branch, 3.4-3.5 times as long as its greatest diameter in -Decapauropus capillaris +Decapauropus capillaris , not 4.9-5.3, the setae of the collum segment, both of the same shape, not sublateral seta much longer and thicker than submedian one, the tarsus of the last pair of legs, only somewhat tapering, not strongly tapering and very slender distally, the size of the st, rudimentary, not well developed, and the shape of the lateral margins of the anal plate, convex, not concave. - -Description. -Length. (0.50-)0.52(-0.65) mm. Head (Fig. 10). Setae on the tergal side thin striate. Relative lengths of setae (holotype only), 1st row: a1=a2=10; 2nd row: a1=11, a2=13, a3=15; 3rd row: a1=?, a2=11; 4th row: a1=?, a2=14, a3=16, a4=?; lateral group setae, l1=19, l2=17, l3=10. Ratio a1/a1-a1 in 1st row 1.0, 2nd row 0.8, 3rd and 4th row?. Temporal organs in tergal view broadest in posterior part, length 0.9 of their shortest distance apart. Pore not ascertained. Head cuticle glabrous. - + +Description. +Length. (0.50-)0.52(-0.65) mm. Head (Fig. 10). Setae on the tergal side thin striate. Relative lengths of setae (holotype only), 1st row: a1=a2=10; 2nd row: a1=11, a2=13, a3=15; 3rd row: a1=?, a2=11; 4th row: a1=?, a2=14, a3=16, a4=?; lateral group setae, l1=19, l2=17, l3=10. Ratio a1/a1-a1 in 1st row 1.0, 2nd row 0.8, 3rd and 4th row?. Temporal organs in tergal view broadest in posterior part, length 0.9 of their shortest distance apart. Pore not ascertained. Head cuticle glabrous. + Antennae (Fig. 11). Segment 4 with five setae, all thin cylindrical striate; their relative lengths: p=10, -p' +p' =44, -p'' +p'' =11, -p''' +p''' =5, r=39. Tergal seta p 1.2 times as long as the length of tergal branch t. The latter fusiform, (3.4-)3.5 times as long as its greatest diameter and 1.3 times as long as the length of sternal branchs,that branch 2.1 times as long as its greatest diameter; anterodistal corner distinctly truncate. Seta q thin cylindrical striate, 1.3 times as long as the length of s. Relative lengths of flagella (basal segments included) and basal segments: F1=100, bs1=5; F2=?, bs2=4; F3=76, bs3=5. F1 3.7 times as long as t, F3 3.0 times as long as s. Distal calyces small rounded, distal part of flagella axes not widened below calyces. Globulus g subspherical, 1.2 times as long as wide, 8 bracts, capsule with flattened bottom; width of g 0.8 of the greatest diameter of t. Antennae glabrous. -Trunk (Figs 12, 13). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 12) furcate, main branch cylindrical blunt striate, secondary branch rudimentary, sublateral setae 1.7 times as long as submedian setae; sternite process triangular, pointed anteriorly; appendages tapering distally. Process and appendages glabrous. -Setae on tergites as setae on the head, 4+4 setae on tergite I, 6+6 on II-V, 4+2 on VI. Submedian posterior setae on VI (Fig. 13) long tapering pointed, 1.4 times as long as interdistance. -Genital papillae (Fig. 14). Conical, 2.0 times as long as the greatest diameter, seta thin, 0.4 of the length of papilla. - -Bothriotricha +Trunk (Figs 12, 13). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 12) furcate, main branch cylindrical blunt striate, secondary branch rudimentary, sublateral setae 1.7 times as long as submedian setae; sternite process triangular, pointed anteriorly; appendages tapering distally. Process and appendages glabrous. +Setae on tergites as setae on the head, 4+4 setae on tergite I, 6+6 on II-V, 4+2 on VI. Submedian posterior setae on VI (Fig. 13) long tapering pointed, 1.4 times as long as interdistance. +Genital papillae (Fig. 14). Conical, 2.0 times as long as the greatest diameter, seta thin, 0.4 of the length of papilla. + +Bothriotricha (Fig. 15). Relative lengths (holotype only): T1=100, T2=152, T3=105, T4=123, T5=131; axes simple straight, very thin and with short pubescence, erect distally; T3 only (Fig. 15) stronger, fusiformly thickened in proximal -3/4 +3/4 and with distinct oblique pubescence. - -Legs + +Legs (Figs 16, 17). Setae on coxa and trochanter (Fig. 16) of leg 9 furcate, branches cylindrical striate, secondary branch shorter than primary one. These setae more anteriorly with rudimentary secondary branches except in coxal setae of leg 2 (paratype male). Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 17) tapering, 3.5(-3.6) times as long as its greatest diameter; setae thin, proximal one tapering pointed, distal one subcylindrical blunt, faintly striate, proximal seta (0.3-)0.4 of the length of tarsus and (3.4-)3.5 times as long as distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. -Pygidium (Figs 18, 19). Tergum. Posterior margin rounded but with small posterior lobe between st. Setae a1 broken or rudimentary, relative lengths of setae: a2=10, a3=18, st rudimentary; setae directed posteriorly, a2 and a3 long thin tapering glabrous, somewhat curved inward. Distance a1-a2 three times longer than distance a2-a3; distance st-st ≈20 times as long as st and 0.4 of distance a1-a1. -Sternum. Posterior margin with distinct indentation and broadly triangular lobe below anal plate. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a2=10): b1=7, b2=3, setae thin tapering, b1 indistinctly striate in distal half, as long as interdistance, b2 0.7(-0.8) of distance b1-b2. -Anal plate somewhat turned up, narrowest anteriorly, linguiform, lateral margins a little convex, on underside of rounded distal part two very short cylindrical blunt appendages protruding backwards-downwards; plate glabrous. - - +Pygidium (Figs 18, 19). Tergum. Posterior margin rounded but with small posterior lobe between st. Setae a1 broken or rudimentary, relative lengths of setae: a2=10, a3=18, st rudimentary; setae directed posteriorly, a2 and a3 long thin tapering glabrous, somewhat curved inward. Distance a1-a2 three times longer than distance a2-a3; distance st-st ≈20 times as long as st and 0.4 of distance a1-a1. +Sternum. Posterior margin with distinct indentation and broadly triangular lobe below anal plate. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a2=10): b1=7, b2=3, setae thin tapering, b1 indistinctly striate in distal half, as long as interdistance, b2 0.7(-0.8) of distance b1-b2. +Anal plate somewhat turned up, narrowest anteriorly, linguiform, lateral margins a little convex, on underside of rounded distal part two very short cylindrical blunt appendages protruding backwards-downwards; plate glabrous. + + Figures 10-19. -Decapauropus capillaris +Decapauropus capillaris sp. n., holotype, ad. 9(♂) 10 head, median and right part 11 right antenna, sternal view 12 collum segment, median and left part, sternal view 13 tergite VI, posteromedian part and right posterior corner 14 genital papillae, anterior view 15T3 16 seta on coxa of leg 9 17 tarsus of leg 9 18 pygidium, posteromedian and left part, sternal view 19 anal plate, lateral view. Scale: a: Figs 13-17; b: 10, 12, 18, 19; c: 11. diff --git a/data/C4/C3/8D/C4C38D6A10DF75AC94B99B44EDCF261F.xml b/data/C4/C3/8D/C4C38D6A10DF75AC94B99B44EDCF261F.xml index 7addb01e484..06dad530e0a 100644 --- a/data/C4/C3/8D/C4C38D6A10DF75AC94B99B44EDCF261F.xml +++ b/data/C4/C3/8D/C4C38D6A10DF75AC94B99B44EDCF261F.xml @@ -1,103 +1,103 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba fuscicornis Blake, 1966 + + + +Stoiba fuscicornis Blake, 1966 Figs 626-28 - - -Stoiba fuscicornis -Blake 1966 + + +Stoiba fuscicornis +Blake 1966 : 219 [original description including figure]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Borowiec 1999 +Borowiec 1999 : 131 [catalog]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 106 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Type material. -Holotype (Fig. 6) and four paratypes in USNM; five paratypes in IJSM. + +Type material. +Holotype (Fig. 6) and four paratypes in USNM; five paratypes in IJSM. - -Type locality. - -"Jamaica" + +Type locality. + +"Jamaica" - -Specimens examined. -Jamaica: Aug 9 1941, LV Burns (USNM: holotype, four paratypes, type No. 68196); St. Thomas Corn Puss Cap, Aug. 1941, CB Lewis (BMNH: 3). + +Specimens examined. +Jamaica: Aug 9 1941, LV Burns (USNM: holotype, four paratypes, type No. 68196); St. Thomas Corn Puss Cap, Aug. 1941, CB Lewis (BMNH: 3). - -Diagnosis. - -Stoiba fuscicornis + +Diagnosis. + +Stoiba fuscicornis (Figs 26-28) is one of the two Jamaican species (with -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii ). It is easily distinguished from -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii by leathery brown or reddish brown coloration of pronotum and elytra (not opalescent), and distinguished from -Stoiba angusticollis +Stoiba angusticollis by rounded body shape, finely and coarsely punctate surface, mandible with 4 teeth (Fig. 59), and elongate labial palpus (Fig. 61). - -Description. -Adult (n=8) length 6.4−8.0 mm, width 5.6−6.7 mm. Body (Figs 26-28) round; profile moderately convex, highest between anterior 1/3 of elytra and middle. Body color leathery brown to reddish brown (not opalescent); antennae (Figs 28, 52) pale brown to dark brown. Antenna (Fig. 52) reaching elytra, pale brown to dark brown; antennomere II shortest, 0.5 times as long as III or slightly shorter; III 2 times as long as broad, as long as IV or slightly longer; III−VII gradually broader; VII as long as broad; V−XI pubescent. Mandible (Fig. 59) with 4 teeth (rarely with vestigial tooth ventrally). Maxilla (Fig. 61) elongated; palpomere IV setose with fine sensilla structure on apex. Pronotum (Fig. 26) hemispherical with anterior margin slightly emarginate, slightly angled antero-laterally; disc moderately distinct, slightly convex, shiny, smooth or finely punctate; margin area moderately punctate. Scutellum shiny brown, same as pronotum. Elytra (Figs 26-27) finely punctate; explanate margin narrower posteriorly, vague in posterior 1/3. + +Description. +Adult (n=8) length 6.4−8.0 mm, width 5.6−6.7 mm. Body (Figs 26-28) round; profile moderately convex, highest between anterior 1/3 of elytra and middle. Body color leathery brown to reddish brown (not opalescent); antennae (Figs 28, 52) pale brown to dark brown. Antenna (Fig. 52) reaching elytra, pale brown to dark brown; antennomere II shortest, 0.5 times as long as III or slightly shorter; III 2 times as long as broad, as long as IV or slightly longer; III−VII gradually broader; VII as long as broad; V−XI pubescent. Mandible (Fig. 59) with 4 teeth (rarely with vestigial tooth ventrally). Maxilla (Fig. 61) elongated; palpomere IV setose with fine sensilla structure on apex. Pronotum (Fig. 26) hemispherical with anterior margin slightly emarginate, slightly angled antero-laterally; disc moderately distinct, slightly convex, shiny, smooth or finely punctate; margin area moderately punctate. Scutellum shiny brown, same as pronotum. Elytra (Figs 26-27) finely punctate; explanate margin narrower posteriorly, vague in posterior 1/3. - -Distribution. -Jamaica: St. Thomas. + +Distribution. +Jamaica: St. Thomas. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/C5/DC/7C/C5DC7CBD7103265D46CDBA5BB3726B31.xml b/data/C5/DC/7C/C5DC7CBD7103265D46CDBA5BB3726B31.xml index b609f5e52a9..2ad513a9133 100644 --- a/data/C5/DC/7C/C5DC7CBD7103265D46CDBA5BB3726B31.xml +++ b/data/C5/DC/7C/C5DC7CBD7103265D46CDBA5BB3726B31.xml @@ -1,81 +1,81 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Angkapauropus leptotrichos -sp. n. + + + +Angkapauropus leptotrichos +sp. n. Figs 53-60 - -Material. -Holotype ad. 9(♀), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, loc. CM-084. - Paratype, ad. 9(♀), ibidem, loc. CM-086. - 2 specimens. + +Material. +Holotype ad. 9(♀), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, loc. CM-084. - Paratype, ad. 9(♀), ibidem, loc. CM-086. - 2 specimens. - -Etymology. -From the Greek leptos, thin, and trichos, hair (referring to the shape of the setae on head, antennae and legs. + +Etymology. +From the Greek leptos, thin, and trichos, hair (referring to the shape of the setae on head, antennae and legs. - -Description. -Length. 0.54(0.56) mm. Head (Fig. 53). Setae on tergal side short thin cylindrical striate. Relative lengths of setae (holotype only), 1st row: a1=10, a2=13; 2nd row: a1=?, a2=13, a3=10; 3rd row: a1=7, a2=13; 4th row: a1=13, a2=17, a3=20, a4=13; lateral group setae not studied. Ratio a1/a1-a1 in 1st row 0.6, 2nd row?, 3rd row 0.2, 4th row 0.4. Temporal organs large, in tergal view ovoid, length as long as their shortest interdistance. Pore not ascertained. Head cuticle glabrous. - + +Description. +Length. 0.54(0.56) mm. Head (Fig. 53). Setae on tergal side short thin cylindrical striate. Relative lengths of setae (holotype only), 1st row: a1=10, a2=13; 2nd row: a1=?, a2=13, a3=10; 3rd row: a1=7, a2=13; 4th row: a1=13, a2=17, a3=20, a4=13; lateral group setae not studied. Ratio a1/a1-a1 in 1st row 0.6, 2nd row?, 3rd row 0.2, 4th row 0.4. Temporal organs large, in tergal view ovoid, length as long as their shortest interdistance. Pore not ascertained. Head cuticle glabrous. + Antennae (Fig. 54). Segment 4 with five cylindrical striate setae; their relative lengths: p=10, -p' +p' =(8-)9, -p'' +p'' =r=5, -p''' +p''' =3. Tergal seta p 0.6(-0.7) of the length of tergal -branch +branch t. The latter fusiform with distal end cut obliquely, (2.4-)2.6 times as long as its greatest diameter and (1.0-)1.2 times as long as the length of sternal branchs,that branch 1.6 times as long as its greatest diameter; anterodistal corner distinctly truncate. Seta q cylindrical striate, almost as long as the length of s. Relative lengths of flagella (basal segments included) and basal segments: F1=100, bs1=9(-10), F2=45(-52), bs2=4(-5); F3=87(-91), bs3=5, curved. F1 4.2(-4.7) times as long as t, F2 and F3 1.8 and 4.4(-4.5) times as long as s respectively. Distal calyces conical, distal part of flagella axes not widened below calyces. Globulus g shortly pyriform, as long as wide, ≈10 bracts, capsule somewhat flattened; width of g as long as the greatest diameter of t. Antennae glabrous. -Trunk (Figs 55, 56, 60). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 55) short simple cylindrical annulate, sublateral setae 1.2 times as long as submedian setae; sternite process triangular; appendages cylindrical, diameter of caps distinctly shorter than top of appendage. Process and appendages glabrous. - -Setae +Trunk (Figs 55, 56, 60). Setae of collum segment (Fig. 55) short simple cylindrical annulate, sublateral setae 1.2 times as long as submedian setae; sternite process triangular; appendages cylindrical, diameter of caps distinctly shorter than top of appendage. Process and appendages glabrous. + +Setae on tergites short cylindrical, numerous and irregularly inserted on I-V, ≈40 setae on I (Fig. 56), ≈15 on V, setae on VI in two transversal rows, 6 ones in anterior row and 4 ones in posterior row. Submedian posterior setae on VI (Fig. 60) 0.1 of interdistance and as long as the length of pygidial setae a1. -Bothriotricha (Fig. 57). Relative lengths: T1=100, T2=?, T3=74(-80), T4=91(-105), T5=117(-124); axes simple straight, very thin and with faint pubescence only distally on T1, T2 and T5, T3 only (Fig. 57) stronger, with longish cylindrical end-swelling, 1/3 of the length of bothriotrix, distinct but sparse oblique pubescence. -Legs (Figs 58, 59). Setae on coxa (Fig. 58) and trochanter of legs 1-9 simple thin cylindrical annulate. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 59) subcylindrical, only somewhat tapering, 3.0 times as long as its greatest diameter; setae very thin, cylindrical annulate, proximal seta 0.1 of the length of tarsus and as long as distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. -Pygidium (Fig. 60). Tergum. Posterior margin with distinct posterior lobes outside setae st, in between straight. Relative lengths of setae: a1=st=1, a2=3, a3=15. Setae very different, a1 short clavate, a2 short lanceolate, diverging, a3 long tapering, curved inwards, diverging, st short clavate, converging. Distance a1-a1 (5.7-)6.7 times as long as the length of a1, distance a1-a2 (3.2-)3.7 times as long as distance a2-a3; distance st-st 8(-9) times as long as st and 1.1(-1.5) times as long as distance a1-a1. -Sternum. Posterior margin almost straight between insertion areas of setae b1, no lobe below anal plate. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=1): b1=9(-10), b2=3, setae tapering pointed, glabrous, b1 0.6(-0.9) of the length of interdistance, b2 0.6 of the length of distance b1-b2. -Anal plate broadest anteriorly, distinctly longer than broad, lateral margins concave, each posterior corner with long thin subcylindrical appendage protruding backward and somewhat curved inward; between these appendages a shorter one protruding backward from tergal side, long appendages almost as long as plate, shorter one 0.7 of the length of plate. - - +Bothriotricha (Fig. 57). Relative lengths: T1=100, T2=?, T3=74(-80), T4=91(-105), T5=117(-124); axes simple straight, very thin and with faint pubescence only distally on T1, T2 and T5, T3 only (Fig. 57) stronger, with longish cylindrical end-swelling, 1/3 of the length of bothriotrix, distinct but sparse oblique pubescence. +Legs (Figs 58, 59). Setae on coxa (Fig. 58) and trochanter of legs 1-9 simple thin cylindrical annulate. Tarsus of leg 9 (Fig. 59) subcylindrical, only somewhat tapering, 3.0 times as long as its greatest diameter; setae very thin, cylindrical annulate, proximal seta 0.1 of the length of tarsus and as long as distal seta. Cuticle of tarsus glabrous. +Pygidium (Fig. 60). Tergum. Posterior margin with distinct posterior lobes outside setae st, in between straight. Relative lengths of setae: a1=st=1, a2=3, a3=15. Setae very different, a1 short clavate, a2 short lanceolate, diverging, a3 long tapering, curved inwards, diverging, st short clavate, converging. Distance a1-a1 (5.7-)6.7 times as long as the length of a1, distance a1-a2 (3.2-)3.7 times as long as distance a2-a3; distance st-st 8(-9) times as long as st and 1.1(-1.5) times as long as distance a1-a1. +Sternum. Posterior margin almost straight between insertion areas of setae b1, no lobe below anal plate. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=1): b1=9(-10), b2=3, setae tapering pointed, glabrous, b1 0.6(-0.9) of the length of interdistance, b2 0.6 of the length of distance b1-b2. +Anal plate broadest anteriorly, distinctly longer than broad, lateral margins concave, each posterior corner with long thin subcylindrical appendage protruding backward and somewhat curved inward; between these appendages a shorter one protruding backward from tergal side, long appendages almost as long as plate, shorter one 0.7 of the length of plate. + + Figures 53-60. -Angkapauropus leptotrichos +Angkapauropus leptotrichos gen. n., sp. n., holotype, ad. 9(♀) 53 head, median and right part, tergal view 54 right antenna, sternal view 55 collum segment, median and left part, sternal view 56 tergite I, right half 57T3 58 seta on coxa of leg 9 59 tarsus of leg 9 60 posterior part of tergite VI and pygidium, posteromedian and left posterior corner, tergal view. Scale: a: Fig. 56; b: 53, 55, 57-59; c: 54. 60. diff --git a/data/C9/36/C5/C936C53C04B72AAE27E3A2D0144A4964.xml b/data/C9/36/C5/C936C53C04B72AAE27E3A2D0144A4964.xml index fe81616c25c..d67f6f4a3fd 100644 --- a/data/C9/36/C5/C936C53C04B72AAE27E3A2D0144A4964.xml +++ b/data/C9/36/C5/C936C53C04B72AAE27E3A2D0144A4964.xml @@ -1,52 +1,52 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Sphaeropauropus convolvolutus Scheller, 1995 + + + +Sphaeropauropus convolvolutus Scheller, 1995 - -Material. -Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, below the top, litter, alt. 2400 m, 1 ad. 9(♀), 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-220. + +Material. +Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, below the top, litter, alt. 2400 m, 1 ad. 9(♀), 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-220. - -General distribution. - + +General distribution. + Known from Doi Inthanon only ( -Scheller 1995 +Scheller 1995 ). diff --git a/data/CA/90/1C/CA901CF719D5DAF4F37986710FC06387.xml b/data/CA/90/1C/CA901CF719D5DAF4F37986710FC06387.xml index 3d3888dc0be..6a03ef0c5e8 100644 --- a/data/CA/90/1C/CA901CF719D5DAF4F37986710FC06387.xml +++ b/data/CA/90/1C/CA901CF719D5DAF4F37986710FC06387.xml @@ -1,52 +1,52 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Decapauropus grandicollis Scheller, 1995 + + + +Decapauropus grandicollis Scheller, 1995 - -Material. -Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1 juv. 5, 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-080. - 1 specimen. + +Material. +Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1 juv. 5, 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-080. - 1 specimen. - -General distribution. - + +General distribution. + Known previously from Doi Inthanon only ( -Scheller 1995 +Scheller 1995 ). diff --git a/data/D3/BE/01/D3BE01F9330047AAFB6C2CA16CE67BF0.xml b/data/D3/BE/01/D3BE01F9330047AAFB6C2CA16CE67BF0.xml index 64fd3f8557a..63b2a889076 100644 --- a/data/D3/BE/01/D3BE01F9330047AAFB6C2CA16CE67BF0.xml +++ b/data/D3/BE/01/D3BE01F9330047AAFB6C2CA16CE67BF0.xml @@ -1,122 +1,122 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - - -Themus + + + + +Themus (Haplothemus) licenti Pic, 1938 -stat. rev. +stat. rev. Fig. 3 - - -Themus licenti -Pic 1938a + + +Themus licenti +Pic 1938a : 161. [Synonymized with -Themus coriaceipennis +Themus coriaceipennis (Fairmaire, 1889) by -Wittmer 1983a +Wittmer 1983a : 224.] - -Themus coriaceipennis + +Themus coriaceipennis (Fairmaire, 1889): -Wittmer 1983a +Wittmer 1983a : 224, figs 43, 111. [Misidentification.] - -Type material examined. - -Themus licenti + +Type material examined. + +Themus licenti : Holotype ♀ (MNHN): [p]"CHANSI. S.O. \ 22.VII.35", [p]"HO CHAN \ 2,255m", [h]"Themus \ licenti n. sp.", [h]"Themus (s.str.) \ coriaceipennis \ (Fairm.) \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" . - -Telephorus coriaceipennis + +Telephorus coriaceipennis : Holotype ♀ (MNHN): [p]"Thibet \ -Tatsienlou +Tatsienlou \ M. F. Biet", [h]"Telephorus \ coriaceipennis \ n. sp.", [h]"Themus (s.str.) \ coriaceipennis \ (Fairm.) \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" . - -Additional material examined. -CHINA: Henan: 1♂, 1♀ (IZAS): Lushi, Jihe forestry station, 1200m, 20.VII.2001, leg. Kang-Zhen Dong. Sichuan: 5♂♂, 1♀ (NHMB): "Szechuen, Yao Gi, nr Mupin, 7400ft., 15.VII.1929, D. C. Graham"; 1♂, 1♀ (NHMB): "Mu San Tsai, 10km NW Weichow, 8700ft., 26.-28.VI.1933, D. C. Graham"; 1♂, 1♀ (IZAS): Luding, Xinxing, Yanzigou, 1560m, 7.VIII.2004, leg. Ming Bai. + +Additional material examined. +CHINA: Henan: 1♂, 1♀ (IZAS): Lushi, Jihe forestry station, 1200m, 20.VII.2001, leg. Kang-Zhen Dong. Sichuan: 5♂♂, 1♀ (NHMB): "Szechuen, Yao Gi, nr Mupin, 7400ft., 15.VII.1929, D. C. Graham"; 1♂, 1♀ (NHMB): "Mu San Tsai, 10km NW Weichow, 8700ft., 26.-28.VI.1933, D. C. Graham"; 1♂, 1♀ (IZAS): Luding, Xinxing, Yanzigou, 1560m, 7.VIII.2004, leg. Ming Bai. - -Distribution. -China (Henan, Shaanxi, Sichuan). + +Distribution. +China (Henan, Shaanxi, Sichuan). - -Remarks. - -Themus licenti + +Remarks. + +Themus licenti Pic, 1938a was synonymized with -Themus coriaceipennis +Themus coriaceipennis (Fairmaire, 1889) by -Wittmer (1983a) +Wittmer (1983a) . However, examination of the holotypes of both nominal species shows that they are different species. -Themus licenti +Themus licenti is obviously different from -Themus coriaceipennis +Themus coriaceipennis in the following characters: head (Fig. 3) width across eyes wider than anterior margin of pronotum, pronotum reddish brown with a large black marking in middle, abdominal sternite VIII of female (see -Wittmer 1983a +Wittmer 1983a : fig. 111) deeply concaved on both sides of the middle emargination of posterior margin; while in -Themus coriaceipennis +Themus coriaceipennis (Fig. 4), head width across eyes narrower than anterior margin of pronotum, pronotum uniformly dark brown, without any black marking, abdominal sternite VIII of female (Fig. 22) slightly concaved on both sides of the middle emargination of posterior margin. Therefore, we suggest -Themus licenti +Themus licenti Pic, 1938a be resurrected from synonymy with -Themus coriaceipennis +Themus coriaceipennis (Fairmaire, 1889). diff --git a/data/DD/ED/8D/DDED8DE0908902ED845D79ED8CB05A96.xml b/data/DD/ED/8D/DDED8DE0908902ED845D79ED8CB05A96.xml index d47bfca31df..07d3f974ec0 100644 --- a/data/DD/ED/8D/DDED8DE0908902ED845D79ED8CB05A96.xml +++ b/data/DD/ED/8D/DDED8DE0908902ED845D79ED8CB05A96.xml @@ -1,157 +1,157 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - -Lycocerus confossicollis (Fairmaire, 1891) -comb. n. + + + +Lycocerus confossicollis (Fairmaire, 1891) +comb. n. Figs 10-11 - - -Telephorus confossicollis -Fairmaire 1891 + + +Telephorus confossicollis +Fairmaire 1891 : ccviii. - -Cantharis confossicollis + +Cantharis confossicollis : -Jacobson 1911 +Jacobson 1911 : 679. - -Athemus + +Athemus (s.str.) multiimpressus -Wittmer 1997 +Wittmer 1997 : 285, figs. 128, 129. - -Lycocerus multiimpressus + +Lycocerus multiimpressus : -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 : 252. syn. n. - -Type material examined. - -Telephorus confossicollis + +Type material examined. + +Telephorus confossicollis : Lectotype ♂ (MNHN): [h] -"Changyang" +"Changyang" , [h]"Telephorus \ confossicollis \ Fairm. \ Tchangyang", [h]"Athemellus \ confossicollis \ (Fairm.) \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"LECTOTYPE" +"LECTOTYPE" . - -Athemus + +Athemus (s.str.) multiimpressus: Holotype ♂ (NHMB): [p]"Chin-ling Mts. \ Shensi. E. B. \ Apr.-May,1904", [h]"Athemus \ multiimpressus \ Wittm. \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" , [h]"REM \ 95 \ 1314", [p]"CANTHARIDAE \ CANTH00001208". - -Additional material examined. -CHINA: Hubei: 1♂ (IZAS): Xingshan, Longmenhe, 6.V.1994, leg. Xing-Ke Yang; 1♀ (IZAS): same data, 9.V.1994; 1♀ (IZAS): same locality, 9.V.1994, leg. You-Wei Zhang; 1♂ (IZAS): same locality, 730m, 22.VI.1994, leg. Jian Yao. + +Additional material examined. +CHINA: Hubei: 1♂ (IZAS): Xingshan, Longmenhe, 6.V.1994, leg. Xing-Ke Yang; 1♀ (IZAS): same data, 9.V.1994; 1♀ (IZAS): same locality, 9.V.1994, leg. You-Wei Zhang; 1♂ (IZAS): same locality, 730m, 22.VI.1994, leg. Jian Yao. - -Distribution. -China (Shaanxi, Hubei). + +Distribution. +China (Shaanxi, Hubei). - -Remarks. - + +Remarks. + Although the type specimen of - -Cantharis + +Cantharis confossicollis was attached with -Wittmer's +Wittmer's manuscript label " -Athem ellus confossicollis +Athem ellus confossicollis (Fairm.)", it has never been published formally for this taxonomic change. In our opinion, this speciesis definitely a member of -Lycocerus +Lycocerus due to the following characters: pronotum subquadrate, all tarsal claws simple and the aedeagus with dorsal plates of parameres separated. At the same time, -Lycocerus multiimpressus +Lycocerus multiimpressus (Wittmer, 1997) is considered to be a junior synonym of -Lycocerus confossicollis +Lycocerus confossicollis (Fairmaire, 1891), comb. n., since we could not find differences between both nominal species in their morphological characters, including appearance and aedeagus. Therefore, we suggest -Lycocerus multiimpressus +Lycocerus multiimpressus is a new subjective synonym of -Lycocerus confossicollis +Lycocerus confossicollis . - - + + Figures 10-15. Habitus, dorsal view 10 Lectotypeof -Telephorus confossicollis +Telephorus confossicollis Fairmaire, 1891 11 Holotypeof -Athemus +Athemus (s.str.) multiimpressus Wittmer, 1997 12 Lectotypeof -Cantharis inopaciceps +Cantharis inopaciceps Pic, 1926 13 Holotypeof -Athemus (Athemellus) bimaculicollis -Svihla +Athemus (Athemellus) bimaculicollis +Svihla , 2005 14 Holotypeof -Cantharis rufonotaticeps +Cantharis rufonotaticeps Pic, 1921 15 Holotypeof -Cantharis brunneonotaticeps +Cantharis brunneonotaticeps Pic, 1922. 10-11, 13 male 12, 14-15 female. - - + + Figures 16-23. 16-21 Aedeagus (16, 19 ventral view 17, 20 dorsal view 18, 21 lateral view) 22-23 female abdominal sternite VIII, ventral view 16-18 -Themus (Haplothemus) licenti +Themus (Haplothemus) licenti Pic, 1938 19-21, 23 -Lycocerus dimidiaticrus +Lycocerus dimidiaticrus (Fairmaire, 1889) 22 -Themus (Haplothemus) coriaceipennis +Themus (Haplothemus) coriaceipennis (Fairmaire, 1889). Scale bars: 1 mm. diff --git a/data/E0/73/9B/E0739B4E85ABE03BE0F7773117814D85.xml b/data/E0/73/9B/E0739B4E85ABE03BE0F7773117814D85.xml index dcf375ef8e1..6c00b7209ac 100644 --- a/data/E0/73/9B/E0739B4E85ABE03BE0F7773117814D85.xml +++ b/data/E0/73/9B/E0739B4E85ABE03BE0F7773117814D85.xml @@ -1,115 +1,115 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - -Stoiba clarildae Zayas, 1939 + + + +Stoiba clarildae Zayas, 1939 Figures 417-19 - - -Stoiba clarildae -Zayas 1939 + + +Stoiba clarildae +Zayas 1939 : 253 [original description including figure]; -Blackwelder 1946 +Blackwelder 1946 : 743 [checklist]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Borowiec 1999 +Borowiec 1999 : 130 [catalog]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 105 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Type material. -Holotype (Figs 4, 17-19) in USNM (Type No. 43117). + +Type material. +Holotype (Figs 4, 17-19) in USNM (Type No. 43117). - -Type locality. - + +Type locality. + Cuba: Prov. -Guantanamo +Guantanamo : Baracoa, El Yunque. - -Specimens examined. - + +Specimens examined. + Cuba: Prov. -Guantanamo +Guantanamo : Baracoa, El Yunque, July 1935 (USNM: holotype, type No. 53529). - -Diagnosis. - -Stoiba clarildae + +Diagnosis. + +Stoiba clarildae is similar to -Stoiba bruneri +Stoiba bruneri and -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis , but it differs from -Stoiba bruneri +Stoiba bruneri by pale, unicolored antennae, less explanate pronotal margin, shiny, dark brown scutellum, and fully developed hind wing. It differs from -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis by black elytra without metallic luster, pronotum shape, elytral base much broader than pronotal base, and elytra broadest near basal 1/3. - -Description. -Adult (n=1) length 7.7 mm, width 7.6 mm. Body (Figs 17-19) rounded, as long as wide greatly discontinuous between pronotum and elytra in dorsal view; profile distinctly convex, broadest and highest at anterior 1/3 of elytra. Head and pronotum brown; antennae pale brown; scutellum shiny, dark brown; prosternal process black with hypomeron brown; thoracic sterna, coxae, trochanters, proximal 1/3 of femora black; elytra black. Mandible (Fig. 58) with 5 teeth; maxillary palpus (Fig. 60) and labial palpus (Fig. 62) compact. Pronotum (Fig. 17) hemispherical with anterior margin slightly emarginate; lateral edge rounded, slightly angled at middle; pronotal disc slightly convex with surface scale-like, sparsely and finely punctate; explanate margin moderately distinct, shallowly and sparsely punctate. Elytra (Fig. 18) distinctly convex; surface scale-like, finely and moderately punctate, broadest at anterior 1/3; margin area narrower posteriorly, extending to terminal end. + +Description. +Adult (n=1) length 7.7 mm, width 7.6 mm. Body (Figs 17-19) rounded, as long as wide greatly discontinuous between pronotum and elytra in dorsal view; profile distinctly convex, broadest and highest at anterior 1/3 of elytra. Head and pronotum brown; antennae pale brown; scutellum shiny, dark brown; prosternal process black with hypomeron brown; thoracic sterna, coxae, trochanters, proximal 1/3 of femora black; elytra black. Mandible (Fig. 58) with 5 teeth; maxillary palpus (Fig. 60) and labial palpus (Fig. 62) compact. Pronotum (Fig. 17) hemispherical with anterior margin slightly emarginate; lateral edge rounded, slightly angled at middle; pronotal disc slightly convex with surface scale-like, sparsely and finely punctate; explanate margin moderately distinct, shallowly and sparsely punctate. Elytra (Fig. 18) distinctly convex; surface scale-like, finely and moderately punctate, broadest at anterior 1/3; margin area narrower posteriorly, extending to terminal end. - -Distribution. - + +Distribution. + Cuba: Prov. -Guantanamo +Guantanamo . diff --git a/data/E2/E6/CB/E2E6CB619FDB2F64B9401EAF495E6EFC.xml b/data/E2/E6/CB/E2E6CB619FDB2F64B9401EAF495E6EFC.xml index f0edb6e1393..d72647aeb3e 100644 --- a/data/E2/E6/CB/E2E6CB619FDB2F64B9401EAF495E6EFC.xml +++ b/data/E2/E6/CB/E2E6CB619FDB2F64B9401EAF495E6EFC.xml @@ -1,152 +1,152 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - -Lycocerus bilineatus (Wittmer, 1995) + + + +Lycocerus bilineatus (Wittmer, 1995) Figs 7-8 - - -Athemus (Isathemus) bilineatus -Wittmer 1995 + + +Athemus (Isathemus) bilineatus +Wittmer 1995 : 275, figs. 140, 141. - -Athemus + +Athemus (s.str.) amplus -Wittmer 1995 +Wittmer 1995 : 278, figs. 146, 147, 203. - -Lycocerus amplus + +Lycocerus amplus : -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 : 249. syn. n. - -Lycocerus bilineatus + +Lycocerus bilineatus : -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 : 249. - -Type material examined. - - -Athemus + +Type material examined. + + +Athemus (Isathemus) bilineatus : Holotype ♂ (NHMB): [p]"Nordwestal. China \ Chinkiang \ Col. Reitter", [h]"REM \ 95 \ 11.9", [h]"A. (Isathemus) \ bilineatus \ Wittm., \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" , [p]"CANTHARIDAE \ CANTH00001927". - -Athemus + +Athemus (s.str.) amplus: Holotype ♂ (MNHN): [h]"V.1917 \ China \ Shanghai \ J. -Herve-Bdzin" +Herve-Bdzin" , [h]"Athemus s.str. \ amplus \ Wittm. \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"HOLOTYPUS" +"HOLOTYPUS" . Paratypes: 3♂♂, 2♀♀ (MNHN): [h] -"Shanghai" +"Shanghai" , [p] -"PARATYPUS" +"PARATYPUS" ; 1♂ (NHMB): [p]"Shanghai \ V.1917 \ J. -Herve-Bdzin" +Herve-Bdzin" , [p] -"PARATYPUS" +"PARATYPUS" , "CANTHARIDAE \ CANTH00001340"; 1♀ (NHMB): [p]"Shanghai \ V \ 1917, J. -Herve-Bdzin" +Herve-Bdzin" , [p] -"PARATYPUS" +"PARATYPUS" , [p]"CANTHARIDAE \ CANTH00002072"; 1♂ (NHMB): [p]"Zi-ka-wei \ 20.IV.1924", [p] -"PARATYPUS" +"PARATYPUS" , [p]"CANTHARIDAE \ CANTH00001986". - -Additional material examined. - + +Additional material examined. + CHINA: Shanghai: 1♂, 2♀♀ (IZAS): "Shanghai, 19.VI.1947, Marist Brothers"; 1♂ (IZAS): -"Zi-ka-wei" +"Zi-ka-wei" , 20.IV.1924. Jiangxi: 2♂♂, 1♀ (IZAS): Jiangxi.Hubei: 2♂♂ (IZAS): Xingshan, Xiakou, 140m, 2.V.1994, leg. Xing-Ke Yang; 2♀♀ (IZAS): Zigui, Jiulingtou, 110m, 1.V.1994, leg. Wen-Zhu Li. - -Distribution. -China (Jiangsu, Shanghai, Jiangxi, Hubei). + +Distribution. +China (Jiangsu, Shanghai, Jiangxi, Hubei). - -Remarks. - + +Remarks. + Both -Lycocerus amplus +Lycocerus amplus (Wittmer, 1995) and -Lycocerus bilineatus +Lycocerus bilineatus (Wittmer, 1995) were originally described in -Athemus +Athemus and assigned to different subgenera. In the original manuscript ( -Wittmer 1995 +Wittmer 1995 ), -Lycocerus bilineatus +Lycocerus bilineatus was described on a single male type, so it made no sense that it was attributed to the subgenus -Isathemus +Isathemus because of no female available. Furthermore, having examined the holotypes of both nominal species and some paratypes, as well as a series of additional specimens, we could not find any difference justifying their separation, even in the tarsal claws, which is the character to distinguish the subgenera -Athemus +Athemus and -Isathemus +Isathemus ( -Wittmer 1995 +Wittmer 1995 ). Consequently, we synonymized -Lycocerus amplus +Lycocerus amplus under -Lycocerus bilineatus +Lycocerus bilineatus . diff --git a/data/E3/65/8C/E3658CFBB9AD5955113B78A3BD473F0A.xml b/data/E3/65/8C/E3658CFBB9AD5955113B78A3BD473F0A.xml index 27ef722bc35..ced30124d9e 100644 --- a/data/E3/65/8C/E3658CFBB9AD5955113B78A3BD473F0A.xml +++ b/data/E3/65/8C/E3658CFBB9AD5955113B78A3BD473F0A.xml @@ -1,248 +1,248 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - -Lycocerus asperipennis (Fairmaire, 1891) + + + +Lycocerus asperipennis (Fairmaire, 1891) - - -Telephorus asperipennis -Fairmaire 1891 + + +Telephorus asperipennis +Fairmaire 1891 : ccviii. - -Cantharis limbatipennis -Pic 1906 + +Cantharis limbatipennis +Pic 1906 : 83. [Synonymized by -Wittmer 1995 +Wittmer 1995 : 256.] - -Cantharis asperipennis + +Cantharis asperipennis : -Jacobson 1911 +Jacobson 1911 : 679. - - + + Cantharis -stoetzneri +stoetzneri -Pic 1926b +Pic 1926b : 154. [Synonymized by -Wittmer 1995 +Wittmer 1995 : 256.] - - + + Athemus -stoetzneri +stoetzneri : -Pic 1933 +Pic 1933 : 4. - -Athemus limbatipennis + +Athemus limbatipennis : -Wittmer 1972a +Wittmer 1972a : 106. - -Athemus + +Athemus (s.str.) maculithorax -Wang and Yang 1992 +Wang and Yang 1992 : 264, fig. 1. [Secondary homonym, preoccupied by -Athemus maculithorax +Athemus maculithorax (Wittmer, 1972), originally described in -Athemellus +Athemellus .] - -Athemus + +Athemus (s.str.) asperipennis: -Wittmer 1995 +Wittmer 1995 : 256, figs. 113, 114. - -Athemus + +Athemus (s.str.) wangi - -Svihla + +Svihla 2004 : 183 [Replacement name for -Athemus maculithorax +Athemus maculithorax Wang & Yang, 1992, nec Wittmer 1972.] - -Lycocerus asperipennis + +Lycocerus asperipennis : -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 : 249. - -Lycocerus wangi + +Lycocerus wangi : -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 : 254. syn. n. - -Type material examined. - -Telephorus asperipennis + +Type material examined. + +Telephorus asperipennis : Lectotype ♀ (MNHN): [h] -"Chang-yang" +"Chang-yang" , [h]"Telephorus \ asperipennis \ Fairm. \ Changyang", [h]"Athemus \ asperipennis \ (Fairm.) \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"LECTOTYPE" +"LECTOTYPE" . Paralectotype: 1♀ (MNHN): [h] -"Chang-yang" +"Chang-yang" , [p] -"PARALECTOTYPE" +"PARALECTOTYPE" . - -Cantharis limbatipennis + +Cantharis limbatipennis : Lectotype ♀ (MNHN): [h]"Yunnan \ (China)", [h]"C. limbatipennis \ Pic", [h]"limbatipennis \ Pic", [h]"von \ asperipennis \ Frm.", [h]"Athemus \ asperipennis \ (Frm.) \ det. W. Wittmer", [h] -"type" +"type" , [p] -"TYPE" +"TYPE" , [p] -"LECTOTYPE" +"LECTOTYPE" . Paralectotype: 1♀ (MNHN): [h] -"Yunnan" +"Yunnan" , [p] -"PARALECTOTYPE" +"PARALECTOTYPE" . - - + + Cantharis -stoetzneri +stoetzneri : Lectotype ♂ (MNHN): [p]"Szetschwan \ Kwanhsien \ Exp. -Stoetzner" +Stoetzner" , [h] -"stoetzneri +"stoetzneri \ n. sp.", [h]"Athemus \ asperipennis \ (Frm.) \ det. W. Wittmer", [p] -"LECTOTYPE" +"LECTOTYPE" . Paralectotypes: 1♂, 5♀♀ (MNHN): same data to lectotype, [p] -"PARALECTOTYPE" +"PARALECTOTYPE" . - -Neotype designation. - -Athemus maculithorax + +Neotype designation. + +Athemus maculithorax : Neotype ♂ (here designated, IZAS): [p]"湖北兴山龙门河 \ 1300m" [Hubei, Xingshan, Longmenhe \ 1300m], [p]"1993.VI.21 \ -采集者：黄润质" +采集者：黄润质" [21.VI.1993 \ leg. Run-Zhi Huang]. - -Additional material examined. - + +Additional material examined. + CHINA: Gansu: 1♂ (IZAS): Wenxian, Qiujiaba, 2360-2650m, 29.VI.1998, leg. De-Cheng Yuan; 1♀ (IZAS): same data, 30.VI.1998. Shanxi: 1♀ (IZAS): "Shansi, Kwashan, 9.VI.1936". Shaanxi: 2♂♂ (NHMB): "Danfeng-NE env., 900-1500m, -33 +33 °45-52'N, 110°22-37'E, 28.-29.V.1995, leg. L. R. -Businsky" +Businsky" ; 3♂♂, 1♀ (NHMB): "Qinling Mts.-N. slpoe, Huxian Co., 1300-1600m, 33°50'N, 108°26'E, 12.-13.VI.1995, leg. L. R. -Businsky" +Businsky" . Henan: 3♀♀ (IZAS): Lushi, Jihe forestry station, 20.VII.2001, leg. Kang-Zhen Dong. Hubei: 1♂ (NHMB): "Shennongjia, Yanzi Pass, 2200m, 31°43'N, 110°28'E, 23.-26.VI.1995, leg. L. R. -Businsky" +Businsky" ; 1♀ (NHMB): "Dashennongjia massif-E slpoe, 31°24-30'N, 110°21-24'E, 2000m, 28. -VI- +VI- 7.VII.1995, leg. L. R. -Businsky" +Businsky" ; 1♂, 1♀ (IZAS): Foping, Liangfengya, 1750-2150m, 28.VI.1999, leg. YAO Jian. Sichuan: 10 spec. (NHMB): "Mt. Emei, 500-1200m, -29°30'N +29°30'N , -103°20'E +103°20'E , 4.-18.V.1989, leg. S. J. -Kolibac" +Kolibac" ; 12 spec. (NHMB): "Mt. Emei, 600-1050m, 5.-19.V.1989, leg. Lad. -Bocak" +Bocak" ; 25 spec. (NHMB): "Kwanhsien, Exp. -Stoetzner" +Stoetzner" ; 1♂, 1♀ (NHMB): "Chengtu, 1700m, 1.-2.V.1933, D.C. Graham"; 1♂, 1♀ (NHMB): "Kuausien, 1934, D.C. Graham"; 1♂, 1♀ (NHMB): "Yaogi nr. Mupin, 8000ft, 14.-18.VI.1929, D.C. Graham"; 1♀ (NHMB): "Shikaizi, Mt. Omei, 4500ft, 1945, D.C. Graham"; 1♂ (IZAS): Mt. Emei, Baoguosi, 550-750m, 27.IV.1957, leg. Fu-Xing Zhu; 1♀ (IZAS): Mt. Emei, Qingyinge, 800-1000m, 20.IV.1957, leg. Fu-Xing Zhu; 1♀ (IZAS): same locality, 30.IV.1957, leg. Ke-Ren Huang; 1♂ (IZAS): same locality, 24.IV.1957, leg. Zong-Yuan Wang. - -Distribution. -China (Gansu, Shanxi, Shaanxi, Henan, Hubei, Sichuan, Yunnan). + +Distribution. +China (Gansu, Shanxi, Shaanxi, Henan, Hubei, Sichuan, Yunnan). - -Remarks. - + +Remarks. + The neotype is designated for -Athemus +Athemus (s.str.) maculithorax Wang & Yang, 1992 here, according to the loss of the type, and for allowing a comparision based on most of the criteria (ICZN, 4th, article 75.3). The -latter's +latter's name was replaced by -Athemus wangi +Athemus wangi by - -Svihla + +Svihla (2004) and now is placed in -Lycocerus +Lycocerus ( -Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 +Kazantsev and Brancucci 2007 ). Having examined the lectotype of -Lycocerus asperipennis +Lycocerus asperipennis and a large series of additional specimens from China, we suggest -Lycocerus wangi +Lycocerus wangi is a junior synonym of -Lycocerus asperipennis +Lycocerus asperipennis , since that we could not find any difference to justify their separation. diff --git a/data/E6/72/74/E6727423DFCB94C77227187C364D3C48.xml b/data/E6/72/74/E6727423DFCB94C77227187C364D3C48.xml index 7d1765586dc..17b8f3786df 100644 --- a/data/E6/72/74/E6727423DFCB94C77227187C364D3C48.xml +++ b/data/E6/72/74/E6727423DFCB94C77227187C364D3C48.xml @@ -1,92 +1,92 @@ - - - -New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand + + + +New records of Pauropoda (Myriapoda) from north-western Thailand - - -Author + + +Author -Scheller, Ulf +Scheller, Ulf -text - - -International Journal of Myriapodology +text + + +International Journal of Myriapodology - -2011 - -4 + +2011 + +4 - -51 -77 + +51 +77 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 -1875-2543-4-51 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.4.1103 +1875-2543-4-51 - - - -Sphaeropauropus angulatus -sp. n. + + + +Sphaeropauropus angulatus +sp. n. Figs 84-94 - -Material. -Holotype ad. 9(♂), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, near Mae Chaem crossing, litter, alt. 1700 m, 1991.vii.12, loc. CM-162. - Paratype ad. 9(♂), below the top, primary rain forest, litter, alt. 2400 m, 1991.vii. 4, loc. CM-206. - Non type material, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1juv. 3, 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-064, ibidem, litter, 1 subad. 8(♀), 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-096, ibidem, below the top, primary rain forest, litter, alt. 2400 m, 1 juv. stad.?, 1991.vii.4, loc.CM-194, ibidem, below the top, primary rain forest, soil, 1 subad. 8(♀), 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-195, ibidem, litter, 1 ad. (♀), 1991.vii.4, loc. 202, ibidem, soil, 1 stad.?, 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-207, ibidem, litter,1 juv. 5, 1 juv. 3, 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-212, ibidem, litter, 1 ad. 9(♀), 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-219, ibidem, litter, 2 juv. stad?,1991.vii.4, loc. CM-222. - 13 specimens. + +Material. +Holotype ad. 9(♂), Thailand, Chiang Mai province, Doi Inthanon, near Mae Chaem crossing, litter, alt. 1700 m, 1991.vii.12, loc. CM-162. - Paratype ad. 9(♂), below the top, primary rain forest, litter, alt. 2400 m, 1991.vii. 4, loc. CM-206. - Non type material, Mae Chaem road, secondary dry forest, litter, alt. 1150 m, 1juv. 3, 1991.vi.30, loc. CM-064, ibidem, litter, 1 subad. 8(♀), 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-096, ibidem, below the top, primary rain forest, litter, alt. 2400 m, 1 juv. stad.?, 1991.vii.4, loc.CM-194, ibidem, below the top, primary rain forest, soil, 1 subad. 8(♀), 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-195, ibidem, litter, 1 ad. (♀), 1991.vii.4, loc. 202, ibidem, soil, 1 stad.?, 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-207, ibidem, litter,1 juv. 5, 1 juv. 3, 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-212, ibidem, litter, 1 ad. 9(♀), 1991.vii.4, loc. CM-219, ibidem, litter, 2 juv. stad?,1991.vii.4, loc. CM-222. - 13 specimens. - - -Etymology + + +Etymology . -From the Latin angulatus, with angles (referring to the shape of the lateral margins of the anal plate). +From the Latin angulatus, with angles (referring to the shape of the lateral margins of the anal plate). - -Diagnosis. - -Sphaeropauropus angulatus + +Diagnosis. + +Sphaeropauropus angulatus is well defined from its congeners by the shape of the anal plate with distinct lateral corners and by the cuticular pattern of the tergites. At present its relationships can not be traced. - -Description. - + +Description. + Antennae (Fig. 84). Chaetotaxy of segments 1-4: 2/2/2/3. Setae of first three segments and seta -p'' +p'' of 4th segment thin cylindrical, faintly striate, p and -p' +p' of 4th segment distinctly tapering, pointed glabrous, relative length of setae there: p=10, -p'=p'' +p'=p'' =10, r=5. -g' +g' of 3rd segment not proved. Tergal seta p 0.8 of the length of tergal branch t. The latter cylindrical, 4.0 times as long as the greatest diameter and 1.1 times as long as sternal branch s. That branch subcylindrical, 2.8 times as long as the greatest diameter. Anteriodistal truncation small, seta q short thin pointed, 0.2 of the length of s. Relative lengths of flagella (base segments included) and base segments: F1=100, bs1=13, F2=51, bs2=7, F3=89, bs3=15. F1 2.8 times as long as t, F2 and F3 1.5 and 2.7 times as long as s respectively. Globulus g straight, stalk thin, g 2.2 times as long as its greatest diameter; ≈10 bracts, capsule almost spherical. Calyces small conical, flagella axis not widened below calyx. Cuticle of antennae glabrous. -Trunk (Figs 85-89). Submedian setae of collum segment (Fig. 85) not proved, sublateral setae thin simple striate; sternite process broad low; appendages short cylindrical with thin caps. Process and appendages glabrous. -Tergites with tuft-like setae with clavate stalk (Figs 86-88). Cuticle between setae (Fig. 89) with very small sessile organs in the centre of round glabrous spots surrounded by dense short pubescence arranged in a checkered pattern. Pubescence longest on lateral parts of tergites. -Bothriotricha. All but T3 with very thin glabrous, very shortly pubescent axes. T3 (Fig. 90) with thicker axes and distal swelling, length of the latter 1/3 of the length of bothriotrix. Relative lengths of bothriotricha: T1=100, T2=144, T3=62, T4=139, T5=146. -Genital papillae (Fig. 91). Longish, 3.4(-3.6) times as long greatest diameter, proximal half subcylindrical, distal half tapering, seta 0.3 of the length of papilla. Cuticle glabrous. Coxal seta of leg 2 as on leg 1. -Legs (Figs 92, 93). All legs 5-segmented. Setae on coxa and trochanter of legs 9 (Fig. 92) furcate, main branch very thin, striate; secondary branch rudimentary pointed glabrous. These setae on legs 1-8 similar. Tarsus of leg 9 slender bow-shaped, (4.9-)5.0 times as long as greatest diameter, two tergal setae, both tapering pointed glabrous. Proximal seta 0.2 of the length of tarsus and (4.0-)4.2 times as long as distal seta. No proximal seta on tarsus of leg 1. Appendage of anterior side of femur of leg 1 not studied. Legs glabrous. All legs with almost straight main claw and small setose anterior secondary claw, length of main claw 0.3 of the length of tarsus. -Pygidium (Fig. 94). Tergum. Posterior margin straight. Setae subsimilar to each other, cylindrical straight glabrous, directed posteriorly. Relative lengths of setae: a1=10, a2=6(-7), a3=14(-16), st=(11-)12. Distance a1-a1 2.5 times as long as a1, distance a1-a2 almost as long as distance a2-a3; distance st-st 1.6 times as long as st and 0.5 of distance a1-a1. Cuticle glabrous. -Sternum. Posterior margin straight. Setae tapering pointed, b3 converging. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1 lost, b2=13, b3=16. b2 as long as distance b1-b2, b3 0.3 of interdistance. - +Trunk (Figs 85-89). Submedian setae of collum segment (Fig. 85) not proved, sublateral setae thin simple striate; sternite process broad low; appendages short cylindrical with thin caps. Process and appendages glabrous. +Tergites with tuft-like setae with clavate stalk (Figs 86-88). Cuticle between setae (Fig. 89) with very small sessile organs in the centre of round glabrous spots surrounded by dense short pubescence arranged in a checkered pattern. Pubescence longest on lateral parts of tergites. +Bothriotricha. All but T3 with very thin glabrous, very shortly pubescent axes. T3 (Fig. 90) with thicker axes and distal swelling, length of the latter 1/3 of the length of bothriotrix. Relative lengths of bothriotricha: T1=100, T2=144, T3=62, T4=139, T5=146. +Genital papillae (Fig. 91). Longish, 3.4(-3.6) times as long greatest diameter, proximal half subcylindrical, distal half tapering, seta 0.3 of the length of papilla. Cuticle glabrous. Coxal seta of leg 2 as on leg 1. +Legs (Figs 92, 93). All legs 5-segmented. Setae on coxa and trochanter of legs 9 (Fig. 92) furcate, main branch very thin, striate; secondary branch rudimentary pointed glabrous. These setae on legs 1-8 similar. Tarsus of leg 9 slender bow-shaped, (4.9-)5.0 times as long as greatest diameter, two tergal setae, both tapering pointed glabrous. Proximal seta 0.2 of the length of tarsus and (4.0-)4.2 times as long as distal seta. No proximal seta on tarsus of leg 1. Appendage of anterior side of femur of leg 1 not studied. Legs glabrous. All legs with almost straight main claw and small setose anterior secondary claw, length of main claw 0.3 of the length of tarsus. +Pygidium (Fig. 94). Tergum. Posterior margin straight. Setae subsimilar to each other, cylindrical straight glabrous, directed posteriorly. Relative lengths of setae: a1=10, a2=6(-7), a3=14(-16), st=(11-)12. Distance a1-a1 2.5 times as long as a1, distance a1-a2 almost as long as distance a2-a3; distance st-st 1.6 times as long as st and 0.5 of distance a1-a1. Cuticle glabrous. +Sternum. Posterior margin straight. Setae tapering pointed, b3 converging. Relative lengths of setae (pygidial a1=10): b1 lost, b2=13, b3=16. b2 as long as distance b1-b2, b3 0.3 of interdistance. + Anal plate pentagonal with distinct lateral corners and two somewhat diverging cylindrical branches protruding backwards from posterior part of sternal side; each branch -with +with two distal appendages: one inner short pointed, the other long clavate; the latter 0.5 of the length of plate; clavate appendages faintly pubescent, other parts of plate glabrous. - - + + Figures 84-94. -Sphaeropauropus angulatus +Sphaeropauropus angulatus sp. n., holotype ad. 9(♂) 84 left antenna, sternal view; 85 collum segment, median and left part 86 tergite I, anterior margin, sternal view 87 tergite I, anterolateral margin, tergal view 88 tergite VI, posteromedian margin, sternal view 89 tergite I, inner part, tergal view 90T3 91 genital papillae, anterior view 92 seta on coxa of leg 9 93 tarsus of leg 9 94 pygidium posteromedian and left part, sternal view, only insertion points of b1 shown. Scale: a: Fig. 91; b: Figs 86-88, 92; c: Fig. 93; d: Fig. 94; e: Figs 84, 85, 89, 90. diff --git a/data/F9/3C/9A/F93C9A6DF1989F30D6876194884F00A5.xml b/data/F9/3C/9A/F93C9A6DF1989F30D6876194884F00A5.xml index 3fab4e3e1b8..1ac1d122893 100644 --- a/data/F9/3C/9A/F93C9A6DF1989F30D6876194884F00A5.xml +++ b/data/F9/3C/9A/F93C9A6DF1989F30D6876194884F00A5.xml @@ -1,110 +1,110 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - -Lycocerus borneoensis Y. Yang & X. Yang -nom. n. + + + +Lycocerus borneoensis Y. Yang & X. Yang +nom. n. - - -Podabrinus atricolor -Pic 1938a + + +Podabrinus atricolor +Pic 1938a : 158. - -Pseudoabsidia atricolor + +Pseudoabsidia atricolor : -Wittmer 1969 +Wittmer 1969 : 128. - -Athemellus atricolor + +Athemellus atricolor : -Wittmer 1972a +Wittmer 1972a : 126 [inc. sed.]; -Delkeskamp 1977 +Delkeskamp 1977 : 47. [Secondary homonym, preoccupied by -Lycocerus atricolor +Lycocerus atricolor (Pic, 1922), originally described in -Cantharis +Cantharis .] - -Distribution. -Borneo. + +Distribution. +Borneo. - -Etymology. - + +Etymology. + The new name is derived from this -species' +species' type locality -"Borneo" +"Borneo" . - -Remarks. - + +Remarks. + This species was located in Borneo and originally described in -Athemellus +Athemellus Wittmer, 1972, which was synonymized with -Lycocerus +Lycocerus Gorham, 1889 by -Okushima (2005) +Okushima (2005) , so it should be placed in the latter genus for the time being. Because of this change, this species and -Lycocerus atricolor +Lycocerus atricolor (Pic, 1922) (originally in -Athemus +Athemus ) become secondary homonyms and the junior is invalid (ICZN, 4th, article 57.3.1), so its name is replaced by -Lycocerus borneoensis +Lycocerus borneoensis nom. n. here. diff --git a/data/FC/67/23/FC672358EE221534F8BD3EC3CB404713.xml b/data/FC/67/23/FC672358EE221534F8BD3EC3CB404713.xml index 205d0abfe46..4c8b9f78728 100644 --- a/data/FC/67/23/FC672358EE221534F8BD3EC3CB404713.xml +++ b/data/FC/67/23/FC672358EE221534F8BD3EC3CB404713.xml @@ -1,166 +1,166 @@ - - - -Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) + + + +Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genera Themus Motschulsky and Lycocerus Gorham (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Yuxia +Yang, Yuxia - - -Author + + +Author -Kopetz, Andreas +Kopetz, Andreas - - -Author + + +Author -Yang, Xingke +Yang, Xingke -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2013 - -340 + +2013 + +340 - -1 -19 + +1 +19 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 -1313-2970-340-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.340.5470 +1313-2970-340-1 - - - -Themus (Telephorops) coelestis (Gorham, 1889) + + + +Themus (Telephorops) coelestis (Gorham, 1889) - - -Telephorus coelestis -Gorham 1889 + + +Telephorus coelestis +Gorham 1889 : 104, t. 10, fig. 7. - -Themus coelestis + +Themus coelestis : -Jacobson 1911 +Jacobson 1911 : 675. - -Themus rugosus -Pic 1929 + +Themus rugosus +Pic 1929 : 8. [Synonymized by -Wittmer 1983a +Wittmer 1983a : 197.] - -Themus (Telephorops) coelestis + +Themus (Telephorops) coelestis : -Wittmer 1983a +Wittmer 1983a : 197, figs. 1, 59. - -Themus violetipennis -Wang and Yang 1992 + +Themus violetipennis +Wang and Yang 1992 : 265, fig 2. - -Themus + +Themus (s.str.) violetipennis: - -Svihla + +Svihla 2008 : 186. syn. n. - -Type material examined. - - -Telephorus + +Type material examined. + + +Telephorus coelestis : Lectotype ♂ (NHMB): without locality information, [h]"coelestis ♂", [h] -"♂" +"♂" , [h]"Themus \ (Telephorops) \ coelestis \ (Gorh.) \ det. W. Wittmer", [h] -"Type" +"Type" , [p] -"LECTOTYPUS" +"LECTOTYPUS" , [p]"Naturhist. \ Museum Basel \ coll. W. Wittmer", [p]"CANTHARIDAE \ CANTH00001277". Paralectotype: 1♀ (MNHN): [p]"Kiukiang \ June, 1887 \ A. E. Pratt", [h]"coelestis \ Gorh.", [h]"Themus \ (Telephorops) \ coelestis \ (Gorh.) \ det. W. Wittmer", [h] -"TYPE" +"TYPE" , [p] -"PARALECTOTYPUS" +"PARALECTOTYPUS" . - -Themus rugosus + +Themus rugosus : Holotype ♀ (MNHN): [h] -"Fokien" +"Fokien" , [h]"Themus \ rugosus \ n. sp.", [h]"Themus \ (Telephorops) \ coelestis \ (Gorh.) \ det. W. Wittmer", [h] -"type" +"type" , [p] -"TYPE" +"TYPE" . - -Neotype designation. - -Themus violetipennis + +Neotype designation. + +Themus violetipennis : Neotype ♀ (here designated, IZAS): "湖南永顺杉木河林场 \ 600m \ -中国科学院" +中国科学院" [Hunan, Yongshun, Shanmuhe forestry station \ 600m], "1988.VIII.4 \ -采集者：王书永" +采集者：王书永" [4.VIII.1988 \ leg. Shu-Yong Wang]. - -Additional material examined. - + +Additional material examined. + CHINA: Shaanxi: 2♀♀ (IZAS): Foping, 16.VIII.2007, leg. Yu-Xia Yang. Gansu: 1♂ (IZAS): Kangxian, Baiyunshan, 1250-1750m, 12.VII.1998, leg. Shu-Yong Wang; 1♀ (IZAS): Kangxian, Heimaguan, 1450-1550m, 13.VII.1998, leg. De-Cheng Yuan. Henan: 1♂ (IZAS): Jigongshan, 700m, 14.VII.2001, leg. Si-Qin Ge; 1♀ (IZAS): Tongbaishan, 500m, 16.VII.2001, leg. Si-Qin Ge; 1♀ (IZAS): Neixiang, Baoyunman, 21.VII.2001, leg. Fu-Qiang Chen. Anhui: 2♂♂ (NHMB): "Dabieshan, 65km SW Huoshan, 1400m, 21.-24.VI.1995, leg. Bolm". Zhejiang: 1♀ (IZAS): Xitianmushan, 23.VI.1998, leg. Ming-Shui Zhao. Hubei: 1♂, 1♀ (NHMB): "Hupeh, Lichuan Distr., Suisapa, 1000m, 22.VII.1948, Gressitt&Djou Collra"; 1♂ (NHMB): same data, 24.VII.1948; 1♂ (NHMB): same data, 29.VII.1948; 2♂♂, 1♀ (NHMB): same data, 31.VII.1948; 1♂, 1♀ (NHMB): same data, 4.VIII.1948; 1♂ (IZAS): Hefeng, Fenshuiling, 1400m, 1.VIII.1981, leg. Long-Long Yang; 1♀ (IZAS): Hefeng, Shayuan, 30.VII.1989, leg. Shu-Yong Wang. Jiangxi: 1♂ (IZAS): Jiulianshan, Huangniushi, 19.VI.1975, leg. You-Wei Zhang; 1♀ (IZAS): Longnan, Jiulianshan, 17.VI.1975, leg. You-Wei Zhang. Hunan: 1♂, 1♀ (NHMB): "Yon-ping, 12.VI.1917"; 1♂ (NHMB): same data, "Yon-ping, 14.VI.1917"; 1♂ (IZAS): Sangzhi, Tianpingshan, 700-1450m, 14.VIII.1988, leg. Shu-Yong Wang. Fujian: 1♂ (IZAS): -Chong'an +Chong'an , Xingcun, Xianfengling, 1170m, 14.VII.1960, leg. Cheng-Lin Ma; 1♀ (IZAS): Dehua, Chengguan, 510-550m, 1.VI.1960, leg. Fu-Ji Pu; 11 spec. (NHMB): "Fukien, Kuatun, 15.VIII.1946, Tschung-Sen leg."; 5 spec. (NHMB): "Kuatun, 26.VII.1946"; 6 spec. (NHMB): same data, 11.VII.1946; 5 spec. (NHMB): same data, 16.VIII.1946; 4 spec. (NHMB): same data, 18.IX.1946. Hainan: 1♀ (IZAS): Wanning, 10m, 9.VI.1960, leg. Chang-Qing Li. Guangxi: 1♂ (IZAS): Longsheng, Tianpingshan, 740m, 17.VI.1963, leg. Shu-Yong Wang; 1♀ (IZAS): Maoershan, Tongmujiang, 800m, 15.VII.1985, leg. Su-Bai Liao. Sichuan: 1♂, 1♀ (IZAS): Youyang, 780m, 15.VII.1989, leg. Shu-Yong Wang. Guizhou: 1♂ (NHMB): -"Kouy-Tcheou" +"Kouy-Tcheou" ; 1♂ (IZAS): Fanjingshan, Huguosi, 1350m, 3.VIII.2001, leg. Qiong-Zhang Song; 1♀ (IZAS): Fanjingshan, Huixiangping, 1600m, 2.VIII.2001, leg. Kang-Zhen Dong. - -Distribution. -China (Shaanxi, Gansu, Henan, Anhui, Zhejiang, Hubei, Jiangxi, Hunan, Fujian, Hainan, Guangxi, Sichuan, Guizhou). + +Distribution. +China (Shaanxi, Gansu, Henan, Anhui, Zhejiang, Hubei, Jiangxi, Hunan, Fujian, Hainan, Guangxi, Sichuan, Guizhou). - - -Remarks + + +Remarks . - + According to the original publication, the types of -Themus violetipennis +Themus violetipennis Wang & Yang, 1992 were deposited in the IZAS and China Agriculture University, Beijing, China (CAUB), but our search of the types in the two Chinese museums have been long, repeated and with no results. The original description of -Themus violetipennis +Themus violetipennis was in accord with the standard of that time but insufficient considering the present level, and neotype allows us to satisfy a better comparision. Fortunately, a female specimen, which was collected at the same locality and date as that of one paratype designated by -Wang and Yang (1992) +Wang and Yang (1992) , was found in IZAS during our study. Its morphological characters are consistent with the original description, so it is designated as the neotype here, in order to clarify the taxonomic status of this species (ICZN, 4th, article 75.3). Furthermore, a careful examination of the types shows that -Themus violetipennis +Themus violetipennis Wang & Yang, 1992 is a junior synonym of -Themus (Telephorops) coelestis +Themus (Telephorops) coelestis (Gorham, 1889), which is widely distributed in China based on the data from a large series of examined specimens. diff --git a/data/FE/54/6F/FE546F4DEDA374B10B8D198FC748EE9E.xml b/data/FE/54/6F/FE546F4DEDA374B10B8D198FC748EE9E.xml index bd429c89eaa..97cf4f31193 100644 --- a/data/FE/54/6F/FE546F4DEDA374B10B8D198FC748EE9E.xml +++ b/data/FE/54/6F/FE546F4DEDA374B10B8D198FC748EE9E.xml @@ -1,392 +1,392 @@ - - - -A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) + + + +A revision and phylogenetic analysis of Stoiba Spaeth 1909 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) - - -Author + + +Author -Shin, Chulwoo +Shin, Chulwoo - - -Author + + +Author -Chaboo, Caroline S. +Chaboo, Caroline S. -text - - -ZooKeys +text + + +ZooKeys - -2012 - -224 + +2012 + +224 - -1 -36 + +1 +36 - -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 + +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -journal article -http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 -1313-2970-224-1 +journal article +http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.224.2964 +1313-2970-224-1 - - - - + + + + Stoiba swartzii (Thunberg in -Schoenherr +Schoenherr 1808) Figures 38-43 - - -Cassida swartzii + + +Cassida swartzii Thunberg in - -Schoenherr + +Schoenherr 1808 : 229 [original description with figure]; -Sekerka 2008 +Sekerka 2008 : 305 [ -Thunberg's +Thunberg's collection list in Uppsala University Zoological Museum]. - -Chelymorpha swartzii + +Chelymorpha swartzii : -Boheman 1854 +Boheman 1854 : 26 [description], -1856 +1856 : 76 [checklist]; -Leng and Mutchler 1917 +Leng and Mutchler 1917 : 212 [supplement of previous list]. - -Chelymorpha swartzi + +Chelymorpha swartzi : -Boheman 1862 +Boheman 1862 : 199 [checklist]; -Gemminger and Harold 1876 +Gemminger and Harold 1876 : 3641 [catalog]; -Leng and Mutchler 1914 +Leng and Mutchler 1914 : 458 [list of the West Indies -Coleoptera +Coleoptera ]. - -Stoiba swartzi + +Stoiba swartzi : -Spaeth 1914 +Spaeth 1914 : 51 [catalog]; -Blake 1966 +Blake 1966 : 214 [figure]; -Borowiec 1996 +Borowiec 1996 : 229 [faunistic record], -1999 +1999 : 131 [catalog]. - -Stoiba swartzii + +Stoiba swartzii : -Blackwelder 1946 +Blackwelder 1946 : 743 [checklist]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Chaboo 2000 +Chaboo 2000 : 379 [outgroup in phylogenetic analysis]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 107 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. - -Stoiba rufa -Blake 1966 + +Stoiba rufa +Blake 1966 : 218 [original description including figure]; -Wilcox 1975 +Wilcox 1975 : 151 [checklist]; -Borowiec 1999 +Borowiec 1999 : 131 [catalog]; -Takizawa 2003 +Takizawa 2003 : 106 [checklist]; - + Borowiec and -Świetojanska +Świetojanska 2012 [online catalog]. syn. nov. - -Type material. - + +Type material. + Holotype (Figs 38-40), with label -"Jamaica" +"Jamaica" , with red label added "HOLOTYPE, -Cassida swartzii +Cassida swartzii Thunberg 1808,det. by C. Shin 2012", deposited in NHRS. - -Type locality. - -"Jamaica" + +Type locality. + +"Jamaica" - -Specimens examined. - + +Specimens examined. + Jamaica: Clarendon Parish: Cumberland District, 3000 ft. Dec. 15-18 1919 (AMNH: 1);W Robinson (AMNH: 2); Kingston Parish: Dec. 1967, NLH Krauss (USNM: 1); Portland Parish: Morces Gap, July 22 1958, MW Sanderson (INHS: 1); St. Andrew Parish: Cinchona Garden in Blue Mts. on vine, June 13 1931, M Kisliuk (AMNH: 1, USNM: 21); Cinchona Garden in Blue Mts. 4900 ft. July 23 1923, FR Mason (MMUE: 1); St. Thomas Parish: Corn Puss Gap, June 1937 (CMNH: 2); Morant Bay Rd. 14.5 miles east of Kingston, 21 July 1963, TH Farr (USNM: holotype of -Stoiba rufa +Stoiba rufa , type No. 68195); Morant Bay Rd. 14.5 miles east of Kingston, Sept. 6 1964, TH Farr (USNM: paratype of -Stoiba rufa +Stoiba rufa , type No. 68195); no further data: ex Holland collection (CMNH: 2); F Klages, ex Holland collection (CMNH: 1); -"5433C" +"5433C" (BMNH: 1); "45 100" [1845 Jamaica, purchased from Gosse] (BMNH: 1); "1867, 6756" [67-56, acquired in 1867] (BMNH: 2); ex Baly collection [retained by Spaeth] (MMUE: 1); no further data (NHRS: holotype; UWCP: 2). - -Diagnosis. - -Stoiba swartzii + +Diagnosis. + +Stoiba swartzii (Figs 10, 38-43) is distinguished from -Stoiba angusticollis +Stoiba angusticollis and -Stoiba fuscicornis +Stoiba fuscicornis by its brown pronotum and reddish and opalescent elytra. It also differs from -Stoiba angusticollis +Stoiba angusticollis by its 4-toothed mandible (Fig. 59), elongate maxillary palpus (Fig. 61), and elongate labial palpus (Fig. 63) and from -Stoiba fuscicornis +Stoiba fuscicornis by a moderately distinct elytral margin. - -Description. - + +Description. + Adult (n=42) length 5.2-10.3 mm, width 5.0-9.6 mm. Body (Figs 10, 38-43) rounded to oval, broadest at anterior 1/3 of elytra in dorsal view; pr -ofile +ofile moderately convex, highest at anterior 1/3 of elytra. Antennae (Figs 38, 56) pale brown; antennomere III 2 times as long as II; IV as long as III or slightly shorter; -V-XI +V-XI pubescent; VII as long as broad; XI as long as antennomere I. Mandible (Fig. 59) with four distinct teeth with one vestigial tooth ventrally or absent; maxillary palpus (Fig. 61) and labial palpus (Fig. 63) elongated. Pronotum (Figs 38-43) hemispherical or trapezoidal with anterior margin slightly emarginated or linear. Scutellum shiny, yellowish brown to deep red (coloration same as pronotum or elytra). Elytra reddish brown to deep red, finely punctate, distinctly opalescent (blue); elytra margin area often entirely distinct. Hind wing fully developed. - - + + Figures 38-43. Habitus. 38-40 -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii (Holotype) 38 dorsal view 39 lateral view 40 ventral view 41 paratype of -Stoiba rufa +Stoiba rufa (= -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii ) 42-43 -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii . (scale bar = 1.0 mm) - - + + Figures 44-63. Head of -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis . 44 dorsal view 45 anterior view 46 ventral view 47-56 antennae 47 -Stoiba angusticollis +Stoiba angusticollis 48 -Stoiba bruneri +Stoiba bruneri 49 -Stoiba clarildae +Stoiba clarildae 50 -Stoiba fascicornis +Stoiba fascicornis 51 -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis 52 -Stoiba fuscicornis +Stoiba fuscicornis 53 -Stoiba indivisa +Stoiba indivisa 54 -Stoiba marginata +Stoiba marginata 55 -Stoiba nigricans +Stoiba nigricans 56 -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii 57-63 mouth parts 57 labrum ( -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis ) 58 mandible ( -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis ) 59 mandible ( -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii ) 60 maxilla ( -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis ) 61 maxilla ( -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii ) 62 labium ( -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis ) 63 labium ( -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii ). (scale bar = 1.0 mm) - - + + Figures 64-80. Thorax. 64 prosternum 65 mesonotum 66 metanotum 67, meso-, metathoracic sterna 68-69 male genitalia ( -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis ) 70-71 male genitalia ( -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii ) 72-80 Spermathecae 72 -Stoiba angusticollis +Stoiba angusticollis 73 -Stoiba bruneri +Stoiba bruneri 74 -Stoiba fascicornis +Stoiba fascicornis 75 -Stoiba flavicollis +Stoiba flavicollis 76 -Stoiba fuscicornis +Stoiba fuscicornis 77 -Stoiba marginata +Stoiba marginata 78 -Stoiba nigricans +Stoiba nigricans 79 -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii 80 -Stoiba rufa +Stoiba rufa (= -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii ). (scale bar = 1.0 mm) - - + + Figures 81-91. Outgroup 81 -Spaethiella +Spaethiella sp. 82 -Asteriza flavicornis +Asteriza flavicornis 83 -Physonota alutacea +Physonota alutacea 84 -Stolas +Stolas sp. 85 -Chelymorpha +Chelymorpha sp. 86 -Phytodectoidea +Phytodectoidea sp. 87 -Elytrogona bulla +Elytrogona bulla 88 -Elytrogona Bacca +Elytrogona Bacca 89 -Elytrogona gemmata +Elytrogona gemmata 90 -Elytrogona nigrodorsata +Elytrogona nigrodorsata 91 -Elytrogona quatuordecimmaculata +Elytrogona quatuordecimmaculata . - -Distribution. -Jamaica: Clarendon Parish; Kingston Parish; Portland Parish; St. Andrew Parish; St. Thomas Parish. + +Distribution. +Jamaica: Clarendon Parish; Kingston Parish; Portland Parish; St. Andrew Parish; St. Thomas Parish. - -Nomenclature. - -Borowiec (1996) + +Nomenclature. + +Borowiec (1996) indicated -Boheman (1862) +Boheman (1862) as the author of -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii . -Sekerka (2008) +Sekerka (2008) clarified Thunberg as the author and the year (1808). In the original description (Thunberg in - -Schoenherr + +Schoenherr 1808 ), Thunberg described with both named -Cassida swartzi +Cassida swartzi and -Chelymorpha swartzii +Chelymorpha swartzii . According to ICZN [Article 32.2.1], "If a name is spelled in more than one way in the work in which it was established, then, except -as +as provided otherwise in this Article, the correct original spelling is that chosen by the First Reviser [Art. 24.2.3] (or, if applicable, by an original author when acting as First Reviser [Art. 24.2.4])." Therefore, the correct name is -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii which was used by the first reviser, -Boheman (1854) +Boheman (1854) . - - -Remarks + + +Remarks . - + The type specimen of -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii is included in the catalog of -Thunberg's +Thunberg's collection at UUZM, however the physical location of the specimen is within -Schoeenherr's +Schoeenherr's collection at NHRS. Thunberg described -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii mainly by coloration. He mentioned the scutellum with the same color as the elytra. We found the color of scutellum can be the same color of either the pronotum or the elytra. -Blake (1966) +Blake (1966) distinguished -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii from -Stoiba rufa +Stoiba rufa by mentioning the coloration of -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii as having "deep purple blue or even deep reddish blue elytra." It needs to be clarified that the purple or blue coloration is not the basic color of elytra but is from opalescence. -Blake (1966) +Blake (1966) also used body size, proportion, and other coloration to distinguish between -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii and -Stoiba rufa +Stoiba rufa . During our study, we found that different sized specimens of -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii have different color variations. We also found varia- tion in body proportion, elytral width, and pronotum shape (Figs 10, 38, 41-43). The figure of -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii in the original description (Thunberg in - -Schoenherr + +Schoenherr 1808 ) shows a rounded body shape, which is different from the oval body shape on the -holotype +holotype of -Stoiba rufa +Stoiba rufa (Fig. 10). However, the paratype of -Stoiba rufa +Stoiba rufa (Fig. 41), which is from the same collecting event and designated by -Blake (1966) +Blake (1966) , looks more similar to other -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii (Figs 38, 42-43). After comparing the holotypes of -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii and -Stoiba rufa +Stoiba rufa (Fig. 10), and other specimens,including a female genitalia comparison (Figs 79-80), we concluded that the variation between -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii and -Stoiba rufa +Stoiba rufa is continuous. Therefore, we synonymized -Stoiba rufa +Stoiba rufa with -Stoiba swartzii +Stoiba swartzii .