diff --git a/data/03/8A/87/038A87EF7E60FFF71F9359B5B7A9F8B0.xml b/data/03/8A/87/038A87EF7E60FFF71F9359B5B7A9F8B0.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5cb25405700
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/8A/87/038A87EF7E60FFF71F9359B5B7A9F8B0.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+
+
+
+A new species of Cyclopoliarus (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Fulgoromorpha: Cixiidae) from American oil palms (Elaeis oleifera) in Caño Negro, Costa Rica
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Barrantes Barrantes, Edwin A.
+Universidad of Costa Rica - Sede San Ramón, Departmento de Ciencias Naturales, de la Iglesia el Tremedal 400 mts al Oeste carretera hacia San Pedro, San Ramón, Alajuela, Costa Rica
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zumbado Echavarria, Marco A.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bartlett, Charles R.
+University of Delaware, Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, 250 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE 19716 - 2160, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Hendrix, Solomon V.
+University of Delaware, Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, 250 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE 19716 - 2160, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Helmick, Ericka E.
+University of Florida, Department of Entomology and Nematology - Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center; 3205 College Ave., Davie, FL 33314 - 7719, USA
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Bahder, Brian W.
+University of Florida, Department of Entomology and Nematology - Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center; 3205 College Ave., Davie, FL 33314 - 7719, USA
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+523
+538
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.4
+1175-5326
+5DB258F4-625A-4729-996A-DAB9B338D06C
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Genus
+
+Cyclopoliarus
+Fennah, 1945
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+species:
+
+Cyclopoliarus biperforatus
+Fennah, 1945
+Amended
+
+Diagnosis
+(updated from
+Fennah 1945b
+). Large pentastirine cixiids (generally
+7mm
++), often distinctly patterned and pale yellow in coloration. Head narrower than pronotum, somewhat anteriorly produced. Vertex relatively narrow and elongated (length nearly 2x width), disc concave, sometimes bearing a short median carina, anterior margin nearly truncate bearing transverse apical carina, lateral margins somewhat foliate, nearly straight (weakly diverging basad); posterior margin angulately incised (sometimes more broadly), subapical transverse carina meeting before head apex connecting with apical transverse carinae by a pair or longitudinal carina forming a median areolet (and lateral triangular areolet), median areolet contiguous with areolet formed by fork of median carina of frons. Frons relatively elongated (and often medially darkened with a pale outer margin), frons plus clypeus collectively forming an elongated diamond shape (both bearing a median carina); lateral margins foliate, expanding to below level of antennae then incurved; lower lateral part of frons bearing a variably defined fossa on each side. Frontoclypeal suture strongly bending to excise quadrate region from within frons. Median ocellus distinct above frontoclypeal suture, lateral ocelli near anteroventral margin of eyes. Eyes rounded, weakly emarginate near antennae. Antennae short (nearly hidden from frontal view by lateral margins of face), scape ring-like, pedicel bulbous bearing sensory plaques. Rostrum long, exceeding hind trochanters.
+
+
+Pronotum short, median carina present, lateral carinae of each side following hind margin of eyes; posterior margin deeply excavate in obtuse angle. Mesonotum broader than long, often marked with three dark longitudinal stripes, with five carinae, intermediate carinae often less conspicuous. Legs slender and elongated, hind tibia with 3 (rarely 2) lateral teeth, apical ornamentation usually 6(3+3 or 5+1)/7/7. Tegmina transparent or weakly embrowned, veins strong and dark, setae-bearing tubercles inconspicuous; elongated, weakly spatulate; composite vein ScP+
+R
+forming long stem before forking of ScP+RA from RP at level near proximal third (CuA forked just before fork of ScP+RA from
+RP
+), usual branching pattern RA 2-branched, RP 3-branched,
+MP
+5-branched, CuA 2-branched.
+
+Male terminalia with pygofer, in lateral view, broad (lateral margins of opening variably expanded in ventral view); in ventral view, medioventral lobe of pygofer triangular, about as tall as wide, lateral lobes of the pygofer elongate, often asymmetrical. Gonostyli elongated (exceeding lateral lobes of the pygofer), slender proximally, expanded and upcurved distally into a somewhat quadrate lobe (often with a triangular flange or a curved spine on inner face). Aedeagal complex (aedeagus plus periandrium) narrow, bearing several elongated processes in varied arrangements; periandrium bearing several elongated spines; from ventral view endosoma elongated (about as long as aedeagus) and partly sclerotized, curving left, to rest retrorsely, subapical region expanded, usually bearing one (or two) apical spine(s). Anal segment in dorsal view elongate ovate, usually asymmetrical and terminating in a pointed lobe; in lateral view apex elongated and pointed.
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+The genus name is derived from ‘Cyclops’ (from Greek, meaning “round-eyed,” the one-eyed giant in Greek mythology), combined with the genus name
+
+Oliarus
+.
+
+It is masculine in gender (
+Dmitriev 2022
+).
+Fennah (1945b)
+did not specify the derivation of the name or whether the name refers to any morphological features, but it might refer to the shape of the anal tube from dorsal view. It may also refer to the dark marking of the face.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+The large size, asymmetrically pointed anal tube of the male, and dark maculation of the frons separate
+
+Cyclopoliarus
+
+from similar genera in the
+Pentastirini
+. The small pits in the lateral portion near the lower margin of the frons appeared to be present in other members of the genus that we examined and might be a consistent (but not unique) feature. Most members of the genus appear to be relatively strongly-marked—unusual among most of the American
+Pentastirini
+—bearing three longitudinal contrasting markings on the thorax and a laterally pale face. The Antillean members of this genus appear to differ extensively from the mainland taxa. The relationship between the mainland and Antillean
+
+Cyclopoliarus
+
+deserves further review (
+Hendrix & Bartlett, 2024a
+).
+
+
+The monotypic
+
+Oliarissa
+Fennah
+
+is the genus most morphologically similar to
+
+Cyclopoliarus
+
+. It most readily differs in the form of the aedeagus (Fennah 1944, figs. 5-6;
+Fig. 7
+), the endosoma of which ventrally bears at least three, short broad processes. The form of the periandrium is very similar between the two genera. The anal tube of
+
+Oliarissa
+
+(Fennah 1944, fig. 7;
+Fig. 6C
+) is elongated and bilobed apically, unlike the asymmetrical, ovate and pointed anal tube of
+
+Cyclopoliarus
+.
+
+They are difficult to separate based on external morphology; the sole species of
+
+Oliarissa
+—
+
+
+Oliarissa armiger
+(Fennah)
+
+—lacks dark maculations on the frons (unlike most other
+
+Cyclopoliarus
+
+from the mainland neotropics) and has a narrower face. The species otherwise share the generally yellow coloration and three dark longitudinal markings on the thorax.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/B0/87/03B087A9FFB03902DDB4A009FF7FFDD3.xml b/data/03/B0/87/03B087A9FFB03902DDB4A009FF7FFDD3.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6171b20d472
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/B0/87/03B087A9FFB03902DDB4A009FF7FFDD3.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
+
+
+
+Notes on the genus Anthaxia Eschscholtz, 1829 (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Anthaxiini) from Myanmar with description of a new species and a new record for Cambodia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Plachetka, Mikuláš
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+437
+441
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.9
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.9
+1175-5326
+14853485
+0B98EE02-1E4C-4154-96C9-FDA949AAEF3E
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Anthaxia haraldi
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+locality:
+
+Myanmar
+,
+Sagaing
+Division
+,
+Alaungdaw Katthapa National Park
+
+,
+22°19.113′N
+;
+94° 28.518′E
+.
+
+
+Type specimens.
+
+Holotype
+♂
+(
+NMHW
+):
+MYANMAR
+:
+Sagaing
+Division
+/
+Alaungdaw Katthapa NP
+/
+22°19.113′N
+94° 28.518′E
+/
+
+3.–13. 5. 2003
+
+, ca.
+
+350 m
+
+, light, / leg.
+Boukal
+&
+Schillhammer
+(101)
+
+.
+
+Paratype
+♂
+(
+MPCP
+): same data as holotype. Type specimens bear red labels with printed text
+
+:
+HOLOTYPE
+[
+PARATYPE
+respectively] /
+Anthaxia
+/ (Haplanthaxia) / haraldi
+sp. nov.
+/ det. M. Plachetka 2024.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+Rather convex, medium sized, lustrous, colourful species. Head large, wide as anterior margin of pronotum, vertex black with green tinge, frons convex, golden orange to red bronze, head covered with long white setae. Eyes projecting beyond outline of head. Pronotum rather convex, with wide depression in lateroposterior angles, golden orange laterally, with black macula with thin golden margin in the centre, lateral margins irregularly rounded. Scutellum wide, cordiform, 1.5 times as wide as long, golden green. Elytra 1.75 times as long as wide, oval, last third tapering. Elytra black-blue, with green or blue-green stripe along lateral margins suture and along the suture. Elytra widely depressed along lateral margins, the depression reaching half of elytral width. Ventral surface lustrous, black with golden orange and green tinge, partly with lustrous reflection. Aedeagus slender, long, spindle-shaped.
+
+
+
+
+
+Description of
+holotype
+.
+
+Holotype
+male (
+Figs. 1, 2, 3
+). Head large, eyes projecting beyond outline of head, vertex black with green tinge, frons convex, near vertex golden orange, then red-bronze. Head covered with rather long, white setae. Sculpture of frons consists of irregular, microsculptured polygonal cells with central grains, with setae growing from central grains. Eyes large, reniform, inner margins slightly, irregularly S-shaped, widest near labrum. Antennae slightly overlapping the middle length of pronotum when laid alongside. Antennae golden orange to copper, covered with long white setae. Scape claviform, about 3.5 times as long as wide; pedicel barrel-shaped, 2 times as long as wide; third antennomere rectangular, 1.9 times as long as wide; antennomeres 4–7 asymmetrically trapezoidal; 8–10 rectangular; terminal antennomere oval with sharp, triangular apex.
+
+Pronotum convex, 1.8 times as long as wide, brightly golden-orange, with a symmetrical black central macula with uneven margins, bordered by a thin golden margin. Lateral margins unevenly curved, widest in the middle, anterior margin bisinuous, lobate in the middle, lateral anterior angles sharp. Pronotum with two depressions near latero-posterior angles, depressions deep, but small. Sculpture of pronotum consist of irregular, microsculptured polygonal cells with central grains, with short white setae growing from central grains.
+Scutellum cordiform, 1.4 as wide as long, reticulate, lustrous, green to golden green, anterior margin strongly depressed.
+Elytra 1.75 times as long as wide, unevenly oval, anterior two thirds almost parallel-sided, posterior third tapering. Elytra with very short, recumbent, sparse, white setae. Elytra lustrous, blue with green or golden green stripe along anterior and lateral margins, near apex very narrow, along suture is green stripe broad in anterior third, then tapering. These stripes partly with light blue tinge, especially at the margins. Each elytron depressed from humeral callosities along lateral margin, this depression wide, reaching half of elytral length, minor depression along suture. Transverse, basal and postscutellar depressions deep.
+Ventral side lustrous, mostly highly reflective. Surface of ventral side consist of irregular, mostly pentagonal cells with central grains, on the sternites cells less distinct. White setae growing from central grains. Proepisternum golden green to golden orange, prosternum blue-black with green tinge, anterior margin green, prosternal process golden green. Mesosternum and metasternum black with strong golden green tinge. Metacoxae golden orange, without any sharp angle or spine. Ventrites black with violet reflection, lateral margins golden-orange to copper red. Last sternite obtusely rounded, apex truncate, without notch, with depression along margin, depression widest near lateral angles.
+Legs rather short, bicolorous: dorsal side black partly with golden-green tinge, ventral side regularly golden-green. Legs covered by white setae. Protibiae unmodified, meso- and metatibiae slightly incurved, with indistinct denticulation and row of white setae on inner margins, metatibiae with small depression near apex on inner margin, with row of setae on both margins. Adhesive pads and tarsal claws pale brown. Tarsi slightly enlarged at base.
+Aedeagus long, slender, spindle-shaped, equally wide from the base to anterior third, then tapering. Apical part of parameres slightly enlarged with several long, pale setae, apices sharp, triangular. Median lobe parallel-sided in anterior three-quarters, then tapering towards triangular apex. Preapical half of median lobe slightly enlarged and elevated, lateral margins with microdenticulation.
+
+Measurements.
+Length:
+4.3–4.6 mm
+(
+holotype
+4.3 mm
+), width:
+1.2–1.5 mm
+(
+holotype
+:
+1.2 mm
+).
+
+
+Variability.
+Although only
+two specimens
+are known, it is clear that
+
+A. haraldi
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+is strongly variable species.
+Paratype
+(
+Figs. 4, 5
+) possesses different shape of pronotal macula (macula itself is symmetrical in both specimens) and different shape of pronotum (widest in posterior third, while widest in the middle in
+holotype
+), elytra are dark blue while margins are greener.
+
+
+
+FIGURES 1–5.
+1—
+
+Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) haraldi
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+, holotype (dorsal view); 2—
+
+A. (H.) haraldi
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+, holotype (ventral view); 3—
+
+A. (H.) haraldi
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+, holotype (aedeagus); 4—
+
+A. (H.) haraldi
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+, paratype (dorsal view); 5—
+
+A. (H.) haraldi
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+, paratype (ventral view).
+
+
+
+Bionomy.
+Unknown.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+Myanmar
+.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+This species is named after one of the collectors, curator in Naturhistorisches Museum
+Wien
+and specialist in
+Staphylinidae
+: Harald Schillhammer.
+
+
+
+
+Differential diagnosis.
+There is no similar species in the Oriental region. Several species of the
+
+Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) weyersi
+Kerremans, 1900
+
+species group have roughly similar elytral pattern, but all of them are much smaller (
+Bílý, 1990
+), less convex and all differ by very widely and deeply depressed posterior angles of pronotum. Species of
+
+Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) collaris
+Kerremans, 1893
+
+species group are similar with respect to general shape of body, however none of these species has a similar elytral pattern and colouration in male (all are green, blue-green or bronze-green, several species with black, usually not well outlined, irregular oval macula along elytral suture and irregular, indistinct dark macula on pronotum), all members of
+
+A. collaris
+
+species group possess tarsal claws with basal hook (
+Bílý, 1995
+).
+
+A haraldi
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+has simple tarsal claws, only with slightly enlarged base.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/B0/87/03B087A9FFB33902DDB4A38EFB79FA57.xml b/data/03/B0/87/03B087A9FFB33902DDB4A38EFB79FA57.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d4bcdc82855
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/B0/87/03B087A9FFB33902DDB4A38EFB79FA57.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+
+
+
+Notes on the genus Anthaxia Eschscholtz, 1829 (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Anthaxiini) from Myanmar with description of a new species and a new record for Cambodia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Plachetka, Mikuláš
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+437
+441
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.9
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.9
+1175-5326
+14853485
+0B98EE02-1E4C-4154-96C9-FDA949AAEF3E
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Anthaxia (Thailandia) rondoni
+Baudon, 1962
+
+
+
+
+
+Specimen examined:
+
+Myanmar:
+♀
+(
+NMHW
+):
+MYANMAR
+:
+Shan State
+/
+NW Kalaw
+, km 15
+Kalaw—Thazi
+/
+20°42.31′N
+96° 30.96′E
+/
+
+16. 5. 1999
+
+, ca.
+
+850 m
+
+/ leg.
+Schillhammer
+&
+Schuh
+(46)
+
+.
+
+Cambodia
+:
+♀
+(
+MPCP
+):
+CAMBODIA
+
+10.–18. 5. 2024
+
+/
+Krong Saen Monourom
+env. /
+Mondulkiri prov.
+/
+Martinů Ivo
+lgt
+
+.
+
+♂
+,
+♀
+(
+AKCC
+):
+CAMBODIA
+Ratanakiri
+Pr.
+/ BANLUNG /
+
+18.–22. 5. 2024
+
+
+320 M.
+/
+13°44′N
+107°0′E
+/ A. Kudrna Jr. LGT.
+
+
+
+
+Not often collected, but probably widespread species, known from
+Laos
+,
+Thailand
+,
+Vietnam
+, recently reported from
+China
+,
+Yunnan
+(
+
+Qi, Song
+et al.
+2023
+
+). New record for
+Myanmar
+, new record for
+Cambodia
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/B0/87/03B087A9FFB33902DDB4A4EEFEA5FBCE.xml b/data/03/B0/87/03B087A9FFB33902DDB4A4EEFEA5FBCE.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ee1c88bd9c4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/B0/87/03B087A9FFB33902DDB4A4EEFEA5FBCE.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+
+
+
+Notes on the genus Anthaxia Eschscholtz, 1829 (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Anthaxiini) from Myanmar with description of a new species and a new record for Cambodia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Plachetka, Mikuláš
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+437
+441
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.9
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.9
+1175-5326
+14853485
+0B98EE02-1E4C-4154-96C9-FDA949AAEF3E
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) dahoi
+Baudon, 1966
+
+
+
+
+
+Specimens examined:
+
+1♂
+,
+2♀
+(
+NMHW
+):
+MYANMAR
+:
+Sagaing
+Division
+/
+Alaungdaw Katthapa NP
+/
+22°19.113′N
+94° 28.518′E
+/
+
+3.–13. 5. 2003
+
+, ca.
+
+350 m
+
+, light, / leg.
+Boukal
+&
+Schillhammer
+
+(101).
+
+
+
+
+One of the most common
+
+Anthaxia
+species
+
+in northern
+Vietnam
+,
+Laos
+and northern
+Thailand
+. New record for
+Myanmar
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/B0/87/03B087A9FFB33902DDB4A5F2FADBFCEE.xml b/data/03/B0/87/03B087A9FFB33902DDB4A5F2FADBFCEE.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8d229b4b38c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/B0/87/03B087A9FFB33902DDB4A5F2FADBFCEE.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+
+
+
+Notes on the genus Anthaxia Eschscholtz, 1829 (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Anthaxiini) from Myanmar with description of a new species and a new record for Cambodia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Plachetka, Mikuláš
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+437
+441
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.9
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.9
+1175-5326
+14853485
+0B98EE02-1E4C-4154-96C9-FDA949AAEF3E
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) agilis
+Obenberger, 1958
+
+
+
+
+
+Specimen examined:
+
+♂
+(
+NMHW
+)
+MYANMAR
+:
+Sagaing
+Division
+/
+Alaungdaw Katthapa NP
+/
+22°18.902′N
+94° 28.060′E
+/
+
+6. 5. 2003
+
+, ca.
+
+400 m
+
+/ leg.
+Schillhammer
+et al.
+(109)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Distributed in south-west
+China
+, northern
+Laos
+and
+Thailand
+(
+Bílý, 2015
+), this is first record for
+Myanmar
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/F8/71/03F87142FF862563C8F5828DDFAB552C.xml b/data/03/F8/71/03F87142FF862563C8F5828DDFAB552C.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ffad2e63a09
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/F8/71/03F87142FF862563C8F5828DDFAB552C.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+
+
+
+Dropephylloidea, a remarkable new genus from south Europe and the Middle East (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Omaliini)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Shavrin, Alexey V.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+353
+362
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.3
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.3
+1175-5326
+14853314
+E6A753FE-DE9C-4264-B8AA-6F928B251911
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dropephylla ivani
+
+nom. n.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dropephylla loebli
+Shavrin, 2024: 592
+
+
+
+syn. n.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+
+Dropephylla loebli
+Shavrin, 2024
+
+was recently described based on the
+holotype
+deposited in the collection of MHNG, collected in
+Kars
+,
+Turkey
+(
+Shavrin 2024
+). Some time later after the description, A.F. Newton (Chicago) sent a letter where he noted that this name “…is a junior primary homonym of
+
+Dropephylla loebli
+Thayer 2003
+
+, from
+Mexico
+and
+USA
+[
+Thayer 2003
+]”. Therefore, a new replacement name is proposed under the Article 34.2 of ICZN.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/F8/71/03F87142FF8B256CC8F582C5DC6250A0.xml b/data/03/F8/71/03F87142FF8B256CC8F582C5DC6250A0.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..738e0341a15
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/F8/71/03F87142FF8B256CC8F582C5DC6250A0.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,424 @@
+
+
+
+Dropephylloidea, a remarkable new genus from south Europe and the Middle East (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Omaliini)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Shavrin, Alexey V.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+353
+362
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.3
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.3
+1175-5326
+14853314
+E6A753FE-DE9C-4264-B8AA-6F928B251911
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dropephylloidea curticollis
+(
+Eppelsheim, 1889
+)
+
+comb. n.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs 1–28
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Homalium
+(
+Phyllodrepa
+)
+curticolle
+Eppelsheim 1889: 182
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Phyllodrepa curticollis
+
+:
+
+Luze 1906: 573
+
+,
+
+Herman 2001: 561
+
+,
+
+Jászay & Hlaváč 2006: 32
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Phyllodrepa
+(
+Dropephylla
+)
+curticollis
+
+:
+
+Bernhauer & Schubert 1910: 48
+
+,
+
+Smetana 2004: 265
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dropephylla curticollis
+
+:
+
+Schülke & Smetana 2015: 344
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type material examined.
+Lectotype
+(
+here designated
+)
+♀
+(left antennomeres 3–11 missing;
+Fig. 2
+; labels as in
+Fig. 3
+): ‘App[e]l | Beirut | 1878.’ <printed>,
+‘curticolle Typ.
+’ <handwritten in black Indian ink>,
+‘curticollis Epp.
+[handwritten in black Indian ink] | det. Luze [underlined by black]’ <printed>, ‘TYPUS’ <red, printed>, ‘LECTOTYPE’ <red, printed> ‘
+Dropehylloidea
+|
+
+curticollis
+(
+Eppelsheim, 1889
+)
+
+| Shavrin A.V. det. 2024’ <printed> (
+NMW
+).
+Paralectotype
+♀
+(dissected): same four labels as in the
+holotype
+, with additional label: ‘
+
+Dropephylloidea
+
+|
+
+curticollis
+(
+Eppelsheim, 1889
+)
+
+| Shavrin A.V. det. 2024’ <printed> (
+NMW
+).
+
+
+
+Additional material examined.
+ITALY
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+1 ♀
+:
+Basilicata
+, Matera, Valsinni (Matera), banks of Sinni River. Trap with vinegar.
+19.06.2002
+. F. Angelini leg. (cZ);
+
+CROATIA
+:
+
+1 ♀
+: Krk Island, environs of Krk.
+01.06. 2003
+. E. Holzer leg. (cZ);
+
+ALBANIA
+:
+
+1 ♂
+(fully dissected prior to the present study),
+1 ♀
+: ‘Albania’, ‘G.C. Champion Coll. B.M. 1927-409.’ (
+BMNH
+);
+
+TURKEY
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+4 ♀♀
+:
+Tunceli
+, ca
+40 km
+NW
+Tunceli
+, road to Ovacik.
+1300 m
+a.s.l., pitfall. 19/
+22.05.2014
+. C. Reuter leg. (cF, cZ);
+
+SYRIA
+:
+
+2 ♀♀
+: ‘
+♀
+’, ‘
+Latakia
+Syria’,
+‘curticollis
+Epp’, ‘ex coll. Klima’ (
+NMW
+);
+1 ♂
+: ‘1023’, ‘243.’,
+‘curticolle Fauv.
+Syria
+. Mus. Vindob.’, ‘c. Epplsh. | Steind. d.’,
+‘curticollis Epp.
+det. Luze’, ‘TYPUS’ (
+NMW
+);
+1 ♀
+: ‘
+Syria
+. Mus. Vindob.’, ‘c. Epplsh. Steind. d.’,
+‘curticollis Epp.
+det. Luze’, ‘TYPUS’, ‘Coll. Mus. Vindob.’ (
+NMW
+);
+
+ISRAEL
+:
+
+1 ♂
+(dissected): Galilee, ravin below Safad [Safed].
+500 m
+a.s.l., sifted accumulation of moist plane-tree (
+
+Platanus
+
+) leaves.
+26.04.1982
+. C. Besuchet & I. Löbl leg. (cSh);
+1 ♀
+(dissected): Galilee,
+3 km
+E Ginosar. Siften moist leaves below
+
+Eucalyptus
+
+trees.
+24.05.1973
+. I. Löbl leg. (
+MHNG
+);
+1 ♀
+(dissected): côte Beit Tzevi. Sifted moist debris under rotten
+
+Opuntia
+
+.
+18.04.1982
+. C. Besuchet & I. Löbl leg. (
+MHNG
+).
+
+
+
+
+Redescription.
+Measurements (n=11): maximum width of head including eyes: 0.33–0.38; length of head: 0.19–0.24; ocular length (longitudinal): 0.09–0.11; length of antenna (
+lectotype
+): 0.57; length of pronotum: 0.24– 0.32; maximum width of pronotum: 0.42–0.47; minimum width of pronotum: 0.35–0.40; sutural length of elytra (length of elytra from apex of scutellum to posterior margin of sutural angle): 0.50–0.59; maximum width of elytra: 0.58–0.64; length of metatibia (
+lectotype
+): 0.26; length of metatarsus (
+lectotype
+): 0.32 (MTrL 1–4: 0.12; MTrL 5: 0.20); maximum width of abdomen: 0.53–0.60; length of aedeagus (from base of median lobe to apex of parameres): 0.25–0.27; total length of body (from anterior margin of clypeus to apex of abdomen): 1.65–2.05 (
+lectotype
+: 1.90).
+
+
+Habitus as in
+Figs 1–2
+. Body reddish-brown, with darker head and sometimes abdomen (some specimens with slightly darker medio-apical part of elytra and yellowish intersegmental membranes of abdomen); antennomeres 3–11 or 4–11 brown; mouthparts, antennomeres 1–2 or 1–3 and legs yellow. Apical part of clypeus with indistinct and middle with distinct transverse microreticulation, infraorbital portions with longitudinal sculpture; neck with dense isodiametric microsculpture, sometimes finer in middle; pronotum with dense irregular and longitudinal sculpture, finer and sometimes invisible in middle; scutellum without or with fine isodiametric meshes. Head with very sparse punctation, slightly denser in middle, some specimens without punctures between middle and anteocellar foveae; neck and scutellum without punctures; punctation of pronotum larger and denser than that on head, finer and sparser in middle; elytra with punctation denser, larger and deeper than that on pronotum, finer and sparser around scutellum and along suture.
+
+
+Head 1.5–1.7 times as broad as long, sometimes with indistinctly elevated surface in front of each anteocellar fovea. Distance between ocelli slightly shorter than distance between ocellus and posterior margin of eye. Labrum as in
+Fig. 4
+. Mandibles as in
+Fig. 5
+. Labium and mentum as in
+Fig. 7
+. Maxilla as in
+Fig. 6
+. Ventral aspect of head as in
+Fig. 8
+.Antenna (
+Fig. 9
+) with wide oval basal antennomere, about two and a half times as long as broad, antennomere 2 1.5–1.6 times as long as basal antennomere, 3 slightly shorter and distinctly narrower than 2, 4 short, about as broad as 3 and about as long as broad, 5 slightly longer and broader than 3, 6 distinctly broader than 5, 7–8 slightly longer and broader than 6, 9–10 slightly longer and broader than 8, apical antennomere 1.3–1.4 times as long as preceding segment.
+
+
+
+FIGURES 19–27.
+
+Dropephylloidea curticollis
+
+: 19—aedeagus, parameral view, 20—aedeagus, lateral view, 21—male abdominal tergite VIII, dorsal view, 22—male abdominal sternite VIII, ventral view, 23—male genital segment, ventral view, 24—female abdominal tergite VIII, dorsal view, 25—female abdominal sternite VIII, ventral view, 26—female abdominal segment, dorsal view, 27—spermatheca, lateral view. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 28.
+Distribution of
+
+Dropephylloidea curticollis
+
+in Europe and the Middle East.
+
+
+
+Pronotum 1.4–1.7 times as broad as long, 1.2 times as broad as head, widest in anterior portion, gradually narrowed posteriad toward obtuse posterior angles; some specimens with slightly concave posterolateral margins; anterior angles widely rounded, sometimes indistinctly protruded anteriad; anterior margin slightly rounded or somewhat straight, sometimes indistinctly concave in middle, slightly shorter than rounded basal margin; latero-apical margins narrowly and laterobasal portions slightly and widely impressed. Prothorax as in
+Fig. 10
+. Mesoventrite as in
+Fig. 11
+. Scutellum as in
+Fig. 13
+. Metaventrite as in
+Fig. 14
+.
+
+
+Elytra 1.1 times as broad as long, 1.8 times to twice as long as pronotum; hind margins straight or rounded. Ventral aspect of elytron as in
+Fig. 14
+. Surface between punctures in middle of each elytron with longitudinal and diagonal elevations.
+
+
+Legs as in
+Figs 15–17
+.
+
+
+Male. Metatrochanter strongly elongate (
+Fig. 18
+). Posterior margin of abdominal tergite VIII indistinctly concave (
+Fig. 21
+). Posterior margin of abdominal sternite VIII widely and slightly concave (
+Fig. 22
+). Genital segment as in
+Fig. 23
+. Aedeagus (
+Fig. 19
+) from relatively wide basal portion gradually narrowed toward rounded apex; parameres from basal part gradually broadened apically, slightly exceeding apex of median lobe, with two moderately long apical setae; dorsal plates slightly exceeding apex of parameres, each with rounded apex; flagellum short and narrow, located slightly above middle of median lobe, reaching preapical transverse sclerotized structure; internal sac very short and narrow, located in basal part of the aedeagus. Lateral aspect of the aedeagus as in
+Fig. 20
+.
+
+
+Female. Metatrochanter simple. Abdominal tergite VIII (
+Fig. 24
+) and sternite VIII (
+Fig. 25
+) narrowed apically, with rounded apex. Genital segment as in
+Fig. 26
+. Spermatheca as in
+Fig. 27
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+I studied
+two specimens
+(females) from NMW with label ‘App[e]l Beirut 1878.’.
+One specimen
+I designate as the
+lectotype
+in order to fix the identity of the name.
+
+Dropephylloidea curticollis
+
+is here recorded from
+Albania
+,
+Croatia
+,
+Israel
+,
+Italy
+and
+Turkey
+for the first time.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/03/F8/71/03F87142FF8F256FC8F581FDDDAA50AD.xml b/data/03/F8/71/03F87142FF8F256FC8F581FDDDAA50AD.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c1500710c89
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/03/F8/71/03F87142FF8F256FC8F581FDDDAA50AD.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,371 @@
+
+
+
+Dropephylloidea, a remarkable new genus from south Europe and the Middle East (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae: Omaliini)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Shavrin, Alexey V.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+353
+362
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.3
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.3
+1175-5326
+14853314
+E6A753FE-DE9C-4264-B8AA-6F928B251911
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Dropephylloidea
+gen. n.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs 1–28
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+species:
+
+
+Homalium
+(
+Phyllodrepa
+)
+curticolle
+Eppelsheim, 1889
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+Body slightly convex, elongate, reddish-brown (
+Figs 1–2
+). Punctation of head and pronotum moderately sparse, larger on pronotum; punctation of elytra dense, large and coarse; abdominal tergites without visible punctures. Dorsal surface of body glossy; head and pronotum with irregular well visible icrosculpture; elytra without microreticulation; abdominal tergites with dense isodiametric sculpture. Apical part of clypeus with sparse, moderately long and erect setae and 2–3 long and erect setae on each lateral part between eyes and median part; pronotum without or with small and fine setation in middle and along lateral margins; basal margin of pronotum with row of very short cuticular fringe; elytra without visible setation or with very sparse short erect setae in middle and along lateral margins; abdomen with very fine and sparse semi-erect setation and elongate setae on paratergites. Body length:
+1.65–2.05 mm
+.
+
+
+Head markedly narrower than pronotum, transverse, slightly elevated in middle, with moderately wide frontoclypeal portion and convex subtriangular supra-antennal elevations; anteriomedian depressions between bases of antennae present, relatively wide and deep; posteriolateral margins of clypeus narrow and subparallel, stretching posteriad toward level of middle or posterior third of length of eyes; nuchal constriction missing. Ocelli moderately large, located at about level of postocular ridges. Anteocellar foveae distinct, wide, relatively shallow and short, subparallel or slightly convergent anteriad toward level of mid-length of eyes. Postocular ridges present, obtuse or subacute, with interspace between posterior margin of eye and ridge about as long as diameter of two nearest ommatidia. Eyes large, slightly protruded (
+Fig. 8
+). Postocular portions strongly narrowed posteriad toward neck. Antenna (
+Fig. 9
+) almost reaching basal margin of pronotum when reclined, with distinctly transverse antennomeres 4–10, progressively broadened apically. Labrum (
+Fig. 4
+) small, with widely rounded latero-apical portions, widely and deeply concave anteriorly, with three long antero-lateral setae and row of shorter setae in medioapical part. Mandibles (
+Fig. 5
+) broad, each with concave laterobasal margin and subacute apex; left mandible with slightly stronger apex; right mandible with slightly crenulate distal margin of medial edge; articulations of molar lobes with fine rounded dents almost in entire half of latero-apical margin. Maxilla (
+Fig. 6
+) moderately broad and long; galea oblong, significantly longer than lacinia, with slightly curved dorsolateral margin in basal half, with relatively dense and long apical setae; lacinia from widest basal portion gradually narrowed apicad, with slightly curved apex and row of small thorns on apical half of inner margin; maxillary palpi long, second palpomere two and a half times as long as broad, gradually broadened apicad, third palpomere slightly transverse, about as long as broad, apical palpomere strongly elongate, slightly narrower and about four times as long as penultimate segment, from apical third gradually narrowed toward apex. Labium (
+Fig. 7
+) with apical part slightly sinuate apically; preapical labial palpomere strongly transverse, about twice as broad as long, apical palpomere wide, slightly less than three times as long as preceding segment, from about middle gradually narrowed toward rounded apex. Mentum (
+Fig. 7
+) transverse, trapezoidal, with two long lateroapical setae. Gular sutures narrowly separated at level of anterior portion of eyes, strongly divergent posteriad (
+Fig. 8
+).
+
+
+
+FIGURES 1–3.
+
+Dropephylloidea curticollis
+
+: 1—habitus, dorsal view (Latakia), 2—habitus, dorsal view (lectotype), 3— lectotype labels. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
+
+
+
+Pronotum transverse, convex, with widely rounded and slightly protruded anterior angles, with bordered and irregularly and slightly (sometimes indistinctly) crenulate lateral margins, more distinct in laterobasal portions; median portion without impressions. Prothorax (
+Fig. 10
+) short, transverse, convex in middle, with long and acute intercoxal process almost reaching middle of front coxae; laterobasal projections moderately narrow and elongate. Mesoventrite (
+Fig. 11
+) transverse, with long and narrow intercoxal process reaching apex of median process of metaventrite. Scutellum (
+Fig. 13
+) wide, triangular, with elongate and somewhat rounded apical part. Metaventrite (
+Fig. 12
+) elongate, with indistinct narrow and elongate median impression, with wide and moderately long intercoxal process extending about middle of mesocoxae.
+
+
+Elytra subparallel, sometimes indistinctly broadened apically, convex, exceeding apical margin of abdominal tergite III, slightly broader than long, about twice as long as pronotum, with narrow epipleura and widely rounded humeri (
+Fig. 14
+), with slightly serrate lateral margins in middle. Wings fully developed.
+
+
+
+FIGURES 4–18.
+
+Dropephylloidea curticollis
+
+: 4—labrum, dorsal view, 5—mandibles, dorsal view, 6—maxillary palpus, dorsal view, 7—labium and mentum, ventral view, 8—head, ventral view, 9—antenna (male), 10—prothorax, ventral view, 11— mesoventrite, ventral view, 12—metaventrite, ventral view, 13—scutellum, dorsal view, 14—elytron, ventral view, 15—fore leg, anterior view, 16—middle leg, anterior view, 17—hind leg, anterior view, 18—metatrochanter, anterior view. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.
+
+
+
+Legs moderately short, with tibia slightly broadened apicad; procoxae (
+Fig. 15
+) large and elongate, distinctly more than half of profemora; mesocoxae (
+Fig. 16
+) wide and oval; metatrochanter small and oval or modificated and very long (
+Fig. 17
+), almost about length of metatibia, from basal part strongly narrowed toward acute apex (male,
+Fig. 18
+); outer margins of femora with several short spines; inner margins of tibiae with a row of elongate spines; tarsi short, apical metatarsomere long, markedly longer than preceding four metatarsomeres.
+
+Abdomen convex, slightly narrower than elytra, with a pair of small oval tomentose spots (wing-folding patches) in middle of abdominal tergite IV; apical margin of abdominal tergite VII with narrow palisade fringe.
+
+Male.Aedeagus unusual (
+Figs 19–20
+), with moderately narrow and elongate median lobe; parameres sclerotized and wide, slightly exceeding apex of median lobe, with basal portions in the place of connections of both parameres strongly and narrowly projected apically; dorsal plates sclerotized and elongate; preapical and middle parts of median lobe with transverse structures; flagellum short; internal sac short and narrow.
+
+
+Female. Gonocoxites wide and short, with very small styli each with long apical setae (
+Fig. 26
+). Accessory abdominal sclerite not recognized. Spermatheca present (
+Fig. 27
+).
+
+Immature stages unknown.
+
+Species included.
+
+Dropephylloidea curticollis
+(
+Eppelsheim, 1889
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Differential diagnosis.
+Based on the general shape of the small, elongate and relatively convex body, the presence of the anteriomedian depressions, the shape of the slightly protruded eyes and slightly crenulate lateral portions of the pronotum,
+
+Dropephylloidea
+
+
+gen. n.
+
+is similar to the Holarctic
+
+Hapalaraea
+Thomson, 1858
+
+,
+
+Phyllodrepa
+Thomson, 1859
+
+, known from the Palaearctic, Nearctic, Oriental and Australian regions, and Holarctic
+
+Dropephylla
+Mulsant & Rey, 1880
+
+. It differs from
+
+Hapalaraea
+
+(some species of that also have a modified metatrochanter in males) by the narrower and slightly more elongate body, less crenulated lateral portions of the pronotum, narrower median lobe and apical portions of the parameres. Regarding the presence of anteocellar foveae, it is somewhat similar to
+
+Phyllodrepa
+
+, but differs from it by the broader shape of them, smaller body and sparser punctation of the head and the pronotum. Based on the shape of the small body and features of the punctation and the microsculpture of the subparallel forebody,
+
+Dropephylloidea
+
+
+gen. n.
+
+is also similar to
+
+Dropephylla
+
+, but differs from it by the presence of anteocellar foveae. From both latter genera, it differs by the slightly crenulate lateral portions of the pronotum. From all genera listed above, the new genus can be distinguished by the very long apical maxillary palpomere, about four times longer than short penultimate segment (last maxillary palpomere in relative genera usually significantly shorter, sometimes distinctly broader in middle), the strongly modified and extremely long metatrochanter in male (
+Fig. 18
+), the unusal shape of the aedeagus with parameres broadened from the basal portion (parameres in
+
+Dropephylla
+
+and
+
+Phyllodrepa
+
+usually narrow, gradually broadened apically, parameres in
+
+Hapalaraea
+
+with narrow basal portion, significantly broadened apically), different structure of the internal sac, and the shape of shortened and transverse preapical gonocoxites in females (preapical gonocoxites in related genera significantly longer, e.g. in Fig.
+88 in
+Shavrin & Zanetti (2020))
+.
+
+
+Natural history.
+Three specimens
+of
+
+D. curticollis
+
+from
+Israel
+were sifted from leaves (
+
+Platanus
+
+,
+
+Eucalyptus
+
+) and moist debris under rotten
+
+Opuntia
+
+. Specimens from
+Italy
+and
+Turkey
+were collected by pitfall traps. Bionomical data for other studied specimens is unknown.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+Dropephylloidea curticollis
+
+is known from several localities in South Europe (
+Italy
+,
+Croatia
+,
+Albania
+) and the Middle East (
+Syria
+,
+Israel
+,
+Turkey
+); see distributional map in
+Fig. 28
+.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+The generic name means similar to
+
+Dropephylla
+
+that is an anagram of
+
+Phyllodrepa
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+The shape of the strongly elongate and narrow metatrochanter in males of
+
+Dropephylloidea
+
+
+gen. n.
+
+is unique feature. Some taxa of
+Omaliini
+have a similar feature in males: e.g.
+
+Hapalaraea settei
+Zanetti, 1983
+
+, known from Sicily, Sardinia and
+Corsica
+, which has an enlarged male metatrochanter, forming proximal and distal angles (
+
+Figs
+7–8
+
+in
+Zanetti (1983))
+, the monotypic
+
+Prosoglypta alesenkae
+Shavrin & Smetana, 2019
+
+, recently described from
+Vietnam
+, having the apical margin of the male metatrochanter with long projection, slightly erected ventrad (
+
+Fig.
+7
+
+in
+Shavrin & Smetana (2019))
+. Comparing
+
+D. curticollis
+
+with other known members of
+Omaliini
+, the shape of the broadened parameres and apical part of the male abdominal segment VIII are somewhat similar to species of the Eastern Palaearctic genus
+
+Tetradelus
+Fauvel, 1904
+
+, known from
+India
+and
+China
+(
+Shavrin 2022
+), but the shape of the significantly larger and broader body (Fig.
+36 in
+Shavrin (2022))
+, and details of the structure of the aedeagus (Fig.
+37 in
+Shavrin (2022))
+are completely different.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/4C/47/85/4C478527C95D083BFF12FF36FE06BB7E.xml b/data/4C/47/85/4C478527C95D083BFF12FF36FE06BB7E.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3b2e020d61c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/4C/47/85/4C478527C95D083BFF12FF36FE06BB7E.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
+
+
+
+Glochiphorus Strohmeyer (Coleoptera, Scolytinae) - a monotypic genus endemic to Madagascar
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Jordal, Bjarte H.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+447
+450
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.11
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.11
+1175-5326
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hapalogenius fuscipennis
+(Chapuis)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs 4–6
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Phloeotribus fuscipennis
+Chapuis, 1869: 44
+
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hapalogenius globosus
+Hagedorn, 1912: 352
+
+
+. synonym by Eggers, 1927.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Hapalogenius congonus
+Schedl, 1950: 206
+
+
+,
+
+syn nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Glochiphorus alienus
+Schedl, 1982: 283
+
+
+,
+
+syn. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+Syntype
+, sex?:
+Caffria
+[
+South Africa
+] [type not located, lost]
+
+.
+
+Syntype
+
+H. globosus
+
+: [
+South Africa
+],
+Pondoland
+[
+ZMHB
+—not located]
+
+.
+
+Syntype
+
+H. congonus
+
+: [Democratic Republic of the]
+Congo
+, Mulungu,
+Kivu
+, leg.
+Lefevre
+[
+RBINS
+]
+
+.
+
+Paratype
+
+G. alienus
+
+:
+S. Afr. Transvaal
+,
+Soutpan
+,
+Pretoria
+,
+25.25S
+–
+28.05E
+,
+
+8.2.1973
+
+, E-Y:8, beeten, leg.
+Endrödy-Younga
+[
+NHMW
+]
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+All
+type
+specimens of
+
+G. alienus
+
+are typical
+
+Hapalogenius
+
+and have similar morphology as verified material of
+
+Hapalogenius fuscipennis
+
+. The antennal club is subquadrate with multiple transverse sutures. Protibiae are wide near apex with small and similarly sized denticles. Furthermore, the basal rim of the elytra is raised and crenulated, not only near scutellum as in subtribe
+Hypoborina
+, but along the entire base. This species is therefore removed from tribe
+Hypoborini
+, which makes the genus
+
+Glochiphorus
+
+monotypic.
+
+
+Type material of
+
+H. fuscipennis
+
+is lost and therefore comparison was made to the original descriptions and verified material by Eggers. It is also clear that the RBINS
+syntype
+of
+
+H. congonus
+
+falls within the variation observed for South African
+
+H. fuscipennis
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/4C/47/85/4C478527C95F0838FF12FB6CFAE9B946.xml b/data/4C/47/85/4C478527C95F0838FF12FB6CFAE9B946.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..00f5a42293c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/4C/47/85/4C478527C95F0838FF12FB6CFAE9B946.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+
+
+
+Glochiphorus Strohmeyer (Coleoptera, Scolytinae) - a monotypic genus endemic to Madagascar
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Jordal, Bjarte H.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+447
+450
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.11
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.11
+1175-5326
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Glochiphorus
+Strohmeyer
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+species:
+
+
+Glochiphorus globosus
+Strohmeyer, 1910: 127
+
+, monotypic (
+Figs 1–3
+)
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+Syntypes
+:
+Madagascar
+, region
+de l’Androy
+, Ambovombe [-25.16, 46.08], fev. & mars,
+Dr J. Decorse
+, 1901 [
+NHMW
+]
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis, genus et species.
+Length
+1.3–1.5 mm
+, 1.2–1.3 × as long as wide. Frons (sex?) concave, tomentose, with fine golden setae encircling the central tomentose area; antennal funiculus 5-segmented, segment 2 as long as segment 1 (pedicel); club flattened, as wide as long, with two broadly procurved sutures marked by setae; eyes entire, strongly dorsoventrally elongated. Pronotum large, wider than long, almost as long as elytra, distinctly asperate on median two-thirds from anterior to posterior margins; vestiture consisting of pale hair- and scale-like setae. Scutellum not visible. Elytral base with fine crest, strial punctures not evident, replaced by granules in single rows or multiple confused rows; interstrial setae scale-like, semirecumbent, confused; erect strial setae shorter and broader than interstrial setae. Protibiae narrow, with four small, lateral teeth, outer uncus large, curved posterolaterally.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution:
+Madagascar
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+All examined
+type
+specimens have concave frons and sex cannot be determined without dissection. The genus is distinguished from other hypoborines by segment 2 of the antennal funiculus being as long as segment 1 (pedicel), and the club is large and flat with strongly procurved sutures marked by setae. Shape of the eyes and the protibiae is typical for
+Hypoborini
+. It is potentially related to
+
+Dacryostactus
+Schaufuss
+
+, but the base of the elytra is not crenulated, which place the genus in the subtribe
+Xerasiborina
+. DNA data and morphological dissections of non-type material is therefore needed to test this hypothesis.
+
+
+With the taxonomic changes made here,
+
+Glochiphorus
+
+is now entirely restricted to
+Madagascar
+. We know very little about the ecology and biology of
+
+G. globosus
+
+other than the habitat
+type
+in which it was collected—a dry shrub landscape in the very south of the island. This kind of habitat harbors some other deviant and species poor lineages of wood boring beetles, such as
+
+Microlanurgus
+Jordal, 2021c
+
+and
+
+Xerasiborus
+Jordal, 2021b
+
+. The special dry shrub landscapes of
+Madagascar
+is therefore of much interest in biodiversity studies. With a steady growth in new species and genus discoveries,
+Madagascar
+continues to be an important area for such studies. However, the once extensive tracts of forest are shrinking rapidly, and there is little time left to obtain a comprehensive record of the Malagasy flora and fauna.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFE7851CDEBCFEF1FA081073.xml b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFE7851CDEBCFEF1FA081073.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..64cf957dcdb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFE7851CDEBCFEF1FA081073.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
+
+
+
+Comments on Neoconocephalus Karny, 1907 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Conocephalinae) species described by Salvador de Toledo Piza Jr.: The first contribution to the knowledge of South American species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Antunes, André Fonseca
+Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Souza-Dias, Pedro G. B.
+Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Takiya, Daniela Maeda
+Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+363
+393
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+1175-5326
+14853407
+007DEADA-1E12-4B21-9682-EF208DF71DC7
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus karollenkoi
+Piza, 1983
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs. 14
+,
+17
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus karollenkoi
+Piza, 1983
+
+. Piza Jr. (1983): 112 [Description]; Otte (1997): 59 [Catalog];
+
+Chamorro-Rengifo & Braun (2010)
+: 43
+
+[Catalog].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+locality.
+
+Serra do Navio
+,
+Amapá
+,
+Brazil
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+Robust body, being the largest neotropical species (
+Fig. 14A, B
+); head conical in frontal view (
+Fig. 14E
+); fastigium of vertex trapezoidal in frontal view, three and half times longer than scapus length, base three times wider than scapus width (
+Fig. 14E
+); lateral lobe of pronotum as long as wide (
+Fig. 14C
+); and wing apex rounded (
+Fig. 14A, B
+).
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 14.
+
+Neoconocephalus karollenkoi
+Piza, 1983
+
+. (A–G) Female holotype of
+
+N. karollenkoi
+
+deposited in MELQ; (A) dorsal habitus; (B) lateral habitus; (C) head and thorax, in lateral view; (D) head, in dorsal view; (E) head, in frontal view; (F) terminalia, in ventral view; (G) specimen labels.
+
+
+
+
+Redescription.
+Head:
+Conical in frontal view (
+Fig. 14E
+); fastigium of vertex trapezoidal in frontal view, three and a half times longer than scapus length, base three times wider than scapus width, tooth weakly projected at basal portion of fastigium (
+Fig. 14C, D, E
+); fastigium of frons little projected, rounded (
+Fig. 14E
+).
+Thorax:
+Pronotum anterior margin almost straight and posterior margin almost convex (
+Figs. 14A, D
+); lateral lobe as long as wide, anterior margin of lateral lobe almost straight, followed by a smooth curve with lower margin almost straight, margin of humeral sinus rounded, invagination of humeral sinus concave (
+Figs. 14C
+).
+Wings:
+Tegmen with basal region slightly larger than apical region (
+Figs. 14B
+).
+Legs:
+Foreleg femur with two ventral spines, genicular lobe triangular and little developed, tympanum with three distinct regions: proximal one circular and closed, median one with a pair of open longitudinal slits, and apical one with a small open slit, tibia with six pairs of ventral spines; midleg femur with four ventral spines, genicular lobe triangular with inner side with acute apex and outer side with rounded apex, tibia with six pairs of ventral spines; hindleg femur with three spines, tibia dorsally with 20 inner spines and 22 outer spines, ventrally with seven pairs of spines.
+
+Color
+:
+
+Type
+specimen mostly brownish yellow, some parts of tegmen green; black on ventral surface of tarsi and ventral margin of the fastigium of vertex.
+
+
+Description of female.
+Subgenital plate:
+Posterior margin concave with two triangular projections (
+Figs. 14F
+).
+Ovipositor:
+extending beyond tegmen apex (
+Figs. 14B
+).
+
+
+Measurements:
+Female
+holotype
+: BdL 34.4(36.0); FL 3.6(3.5); PdL 7.7(8.0); TegL 58.4(48.0); FlegL 8.1; HlegL 26.4(25.0); OvL 39.1(37.0). Females (n=2): BdL 33.1–34.7; FL 3.3–3.5; PdL 7.4–8.0; TegL 55.4–57.3; FlegL 7.9–8.1; HlegL 26.0–27.4; OvL 37.8–40.2.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+Brazil
+:
+Amapá
+and
+Pará
+[new record]
+states.
+
+
+Taxonomic notes.
+This species is most similar with
+
+N. colorificus
+(
+Walker, 1869
+)
+
+,
+
+N. nigromaculatus
+(
+Redtenbacher, 1891
+)
+
+, and
+
+N. truncatirostris
+(
+Redtenbacher, 1891
+)
+
+. However,
+
+N. karollenkoi
+
+can be distinguished from
+
+N. colorificus
+
+by fastigium of vertex thicker and straight (
+Fig. 14C, D, E
+) (thinner and slightly curved apex in
+
+N. colorificus
+
+) and from
+
+N. truncatirostris
+
+and
+
+N. nigromaculatus
+
+by tooth at fastigium base weakly projected (
+Fig. 14C
+) (developed and downcurved in
+
+N. truncatirostris
+
+and
+
+N. nigromaculatus
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+Neoconocephalus karollenkoi
+
+:
+
+Female
+holotype
+“Serra do Navio; Territ. do
+Amapá
+;
+Brasil
+;
+
+X.1957
+
+;
+K. Lenko
+leg.” [
+MELQ
+]
+
+.
+
+
+Additional material.
+Females:
+
+Two females
+“
+BRASIL
+, PA,
+Belterra
+,
+Fazenda Treviso
+;
+3°8’56.7” S
+/
+54°50’25,2”W
+;
+
+01–11.XII.2018
+
+; Souza-Dias, Monné equipe legs.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32464
+,
+MNRJ-ENT6-32465
+]
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF38509DEBCFF46FC771034.xml b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF38509DEBCFF46FC771034.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..cc3ac920980
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF38509DEBCFF46FC771034.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+
+
+
+Comments on Neoconocephalus Karny, 1907 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Conocephalinae) species described by Salvador de Toledo Piza Jr.: The first contribution to the knowledge of South American species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Antunes, André Fonseca
+Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Souza-Dias, Pedro G. B.
+Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Takiya, Daniela Maeda
+Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+363
+393
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+1175-5326
+14853407
+007DEADA-1E12-4B21-9682-EF208DF71DC7
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus
+Karny, 1907
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs 1–17
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+species.
+
+
+Neoconocephalus subulatus
+(
+Bolívar, 1881
+)
+
+
+
+Emended redescription
+(based on
+Naskrecki 2000
+).
+Head
+: Frons smooth; fastigium of vertex projected, basal tooth present, base wider than scapus width, apex longer than scapus length.
+Thorax:
+Pronotal disk smooth; lateral lobes faintly rough; prosternum with a pair of long spines; mesosternum triangular with rounded edges and two triangular lobes; metasternum triangular with semioval lobes.
+Wings:
+Tegmen developed and elongated, usually extending beyond abdomen apex.
+Legs:
+Precoxal spine present; foreleg with tympanum provided with two or three distinct areas; mid- and hindlegs always with spines.
+
+Color
+:
+
+Body with uniform or marbled coloration generally ranging from light green to brown, mandible and ventral part of tarsi and sometimes ventral part of fastigium of the vertex, black.
+
+
+
+
+Description of male.
+Abdomen:
+Tenth tergite margin projected with two lateral projections.
+
+Cercus
+:
+
+Developed with two distal lobes, each lobe with spike-shaped apex facing proximally, dorsal lobe of cercus with a robust base, ventral lobe of cercus with terminal spine.
+Subgenital plate
+: Longer than wide, with prominent median and lateral carinae, posterior margin in an open V-shaped with two styles.
+
+
+Description of female
+(based on
+Naskrecki 2000
+).
+
+Cercus
+:
+
+Long, cylindrical, and unmodified.
+Subgenital plate
+: Invaginated with two lateral projections; ovipositor straight and long.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF3850EDEBCFC3BFCD41197.xml b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF3850EDEBCFC3BFCD41197.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..06a6886bfab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF3850EDEBCFC3BFCD41197.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,830 @@
+
+
+
+Comments on Neoconocephalus Karny, 1907 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Conocephalinae) species described by Salvador de Toledo Piza Jr.: The first contribution to the knowledge of South American species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Antunes, André Fonseca
+Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Souza-Dias, Pedro G. B.
+Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Takiya, Daniela Maeda
+Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+363
+393
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+1175-5326
+14853407
+007DEADA-1E12-4B21-9682-EF208DF71DC7
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus boraceae
+Piza, 1952
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs. 1
+,
+2
+,
+17
+,
+18A–B
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus boraceae
+Piza, 1952
+
+. Piza Jr. (1952): 245 [Description];
+
+Paschoal & Barros (1977)
+: 241
+
+[Catalog];
+
+Chamorro-Rengifo & Braun (2010)
+: 43
+
+[Catalog].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+locality.
+
+Estação Biológica de Boracéia
+,
+Salesópolis
+,
+São Paulo
+,
+Brazil
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+Head semi-ovoid in frontal view (
+Figs. 1E, M
+,
+2E
+); fastigium of vertex trapezoidal in frontal view, two and a half times longer than scapus length, base three times wider than scapus width, tooth of base projected and space between fastigium of vertex and fastigium of frons approximately half the length of scapus (
+Figs. 1C, D, E, K, L, M
+,
+2C, D, E
+); pronotum lateral lobe slightly longer than wide (
+Figs. 1C, K
+,
+2C
+); and tegmen with basal and apical region equally wide and apex slightly rounded (
+Figs. 1B, J
+,
+2B
+).
+
+
+
+
+Redescription.
+Head:
+Semioval in frontal view (
+Figs. 1E, M
+,
+2E
+); fastigium of vertex slightly trapezoidal in frontal view, two and a half times longer than scapus length, base three times wider than scapus width, tooth projected at basal portion of fastigium (
+Figs. 1C, D, E, K, L, M
+,
+2C, D, E
+); fastigium of frons little projected, triangular (
+Figs. 1E, M
+,
+2E
+).
+Thorax:
+Pronotum anterior margin almost straight and posterior margin slightly convex (
+Figs. 1D, L
+,
+2D
+); lateral lobe slightly longer than wide, anterior margin of the lateral lobe straight followed by sharp curve with straight lower margin; margin of humeral sinus broadly rounded, invagination of humeral sinus in an open V-shaped or concave (
+Figs. 1C, K
+,
+2C
+).
+Wings:
+Tegmen with basal and apical region equally wide (
+Figs. 1B, J
+,
+2B
+).
+Legs:
+foreleg genicular lobe with inner side wide with rounded apex and outer side with triangular apex, tympanum with three distinct regions: proximal one rounded and closed, median one with a pair of open longitudinal slits, and apical one almost rounded and closed, tibia with six pairs of ventral spines; midleg genicular lobe with inner side triangular with acute apex and outer side with rounded apex, tibia with seven ventral spines on inner margin and nine on outer margin; hindleg femur with nine pairs of short ventral spines, genicular lobe little developed and slightly curved, tibia dorsally with approximately 20 inner spines and 29 outer spines, in addition to two pairs of spurs, ventrally with eight pairs of small alternating spines.
+
+Color
+:
+
+Living male and female specimens mostly green (
+Fig. 18A–B
+).
+Type
+specimen greenish yellow; black maculae on ventral surface of tarsi and frontal area of the fastigium of the vertex (
+Figs. 1E, M
+,
+2E
+).
+
+
+Description of male.
+Tegmen
+: Stridulatory area with two distinct elevated transverse regions, anterior one oval and the posterior one rounded (
+Fig. 1F
+).
+
+Cercus
+:
+
+Dorsal lobe with spine measuring half the length of lobe; ventral lobe two times longer than dorsal lobe (
+Figs. 1G, H
+).
+
+
+Description of female.
+Subgenital plate:
+Posterior margin weakly concave, with pair of lateral triangular projections (
+Figs. 1N
+,
+2F
+).
+Ovipositor:
+Extending beyond tegmen apex (
+Figs. 1J
+,
+2B
+).
+
+
+
+FIGURE 1.
+
+Neoconocephalus boraceae
+Piza, 1952
+
+. (A–H) Male specimen deposited in UFVB. (A) dorsal habitus; (B) lateral habitus; (C) head and thorax, in lateral view; (D) head, in dorsal view; (E) head, in frontal view; (F) stridulatory area; terminalia, in lateral (G) and (H) ventral views. (I–O) Female holotype of
+
+N. boraceae
+
+deposited in MELQ. (I) dorsal habitus; (J) lateral habitus; (K) head and thorax, in lateral view; (L) head, in dorsal view; (M) head, in frontal view; (N) terminalia, in ventral view; (O) specimen labels.
+
+
+
+Measurements:
+Female
+holotype
+: BdL 29.1(30.0); FL 3.2(2.9); PdL 7.9(8.5); TegL 41.8(41.0); FlegL 8.1;
+
+HlegL 26.9(27.0); OvL 40.8(35.0). Females (n=18): BdL 27.8–32.5; FL 2.9–3.2; PdL 8.0–8.3; TegL 41.8–44.7;
+FlegL 7.6–8.4; HlegL 26.5–27.6; OvL 37.9–41.1. Males (n=12): BdL 26.4–29.7; FL 1.7–1.9; PdL 7.6–8.0; TegL 35.1–38.3; FlegL 6.3–7.1; HlegL 20.0–21.4.
+
+
+
+FIGURE 2.
+
+Neoconocephalus boraceae
+Piza, 1952
+
+. (A–F) Female specimen deposited in DZRJ. (A) dorsal habitus; (B) lateral habitus; (C) head and thorax, in lateral view; (D) head, in dorsal view; (E) head, in frontal view; (F) terminalia, in ventral view.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+Brazil
+:
+Minas Gerais
+[
+new record
+],
+São Paulo
+, and
+Rio de Janeiro
+[
+new record
+] states.
+
+
+Taxonomic notes.
+This species is most similar with
+
+N
+.
+affinis
+(
+Palisot de Beauvois, 1819
+)
+
+,
+
+N. minor
+(
+Karny, 1907
+)
+
+, and
+
+N. nigrosignatus
+(
+Karny, 1907
+) Nevertheless
+
+,
+
+N. boraceae
+
+can be distinguished from
+
+N. affinis
+
+by stridulatory area with two distinct elevated regions, the anterior one measuring approximately one third of tegmen width (
+Fig. 1F
+) (stridulatory area with single elevated region with length subequal to tegmen width in
+
+N. affinis
+
+), from
+
+N. minor
+
+by the pronotum posterior margin slightly convex (
+Figs. 1D, L
+,
+2D
+) and stridulatory area with two elevated transverse regions (
+Fig. 1F
+) (pronotum posterior margin convex and stridulatory area with single elevated region in
+
+N. minor
+
+), and from
+
+N. nigrosignatus
+
+by the ovipositor extending beyond or reaching the tegmen apex (
+Figs. 1J
+,
+2B
+) (ovipositor not reaching tegmen apex in
+
+N. nigrosignatus
+
+). Finally,
+Piza (1983)
+pointed similarities between
+
+N. boraceae
+
+and
+
+N. boraceanus
+
+, but the former can be easily distinguished by its tegmen with slightly rounded apex (
+Figs. 1B, J
+,
+2B
+) (oblique in
+
+N. boraceanus
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+Neoconocephalus boraceae
+
+:
+
+female
+holotype
+“
+BR
+.—S.P.—Salesópolis; Boracea
+
+6–11. Mar. 1948
+
+;
+Travassos P. Braz
+, Rabello & Bohermann.” [
+MELQ
+]
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Additional material
+.
+
+
+Females
+
+:
+Three females
+“Brasil,
+RJ
+, Mendes, Centro Marista São José das Paineiras;
+
+
+27– 31.
+V
+.2014
+
+
+; Manual;
+Costa. B.B.
+leg.” [
+DZRJ
+ORT 0770
+,
+DZRJ
+ORT0771
+and
+DZRJ
+ORT0776
+].
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Mendes
+,
+Centro Marista São José
+das
+Paineiras
+;
+
+25–29.IV.2012
+
+;
+Manual
+;
+Cunha
+et al.
+leg.” [
+DZRJ
+ORT0062
+].
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Mendes
+,
+Centro Marista São José
+das
+Paineiras
+;
+
+14–19.
+V
+
+
+
+.2013; Manual;
+Macedo, L.S.
+leg. [
+DZRJ
+ORT0208
+].
+One female
+“Brasil,
+RJ
+, Mendes, Centro Marista São José das Paineiras;
+
+27.IV.2011
+
+; Manual;
+Pereira, F.
+leg.” [
+DZRJ
+ORT0082
+].
+Two females
+“Parq.Arq. e Amb. de São João Marcos, Rio Claro,
+RJ
+,
+BR
+, Estrada Imperial;
+
+07–08.VIII.2018
+
+;
+Luiz Carmo
+leg.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32496
+,
+MNRJ-ENT6-32497
+].
+Three females
+“Brasil,
+RJ
+, Nova Iguaçu,
+REBIO
+do Tinguá;
+
+26–27.XI.2019
+
+;
+Souza-Dias P.
+leg.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32491
+,
+MNRJ-ENT6- 32492
+,
+MNRJ-ENT6-32493
+].
+One female
+“Brasil,
+RJ
+, Nova Iguaçu, Rebio do Tinguá;
+
+16–17.XII.2019
+
+; Souza-Dias,
+P. Siqueira
+, A.M. legs.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32494
+].
+Two females
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Rio
+das
+Ostras
+,
+REBIO
+
+
+União
+;
+22°25’31S
+42°02’21”W
+;
+
+21–25.II.2022
+
+;
+Disciplina
+PPGZoo—
+Souza Dias
+& equipe legs.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32200
+,
+MNRJ-ENT6-32485
+].
+Two females
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Nova Iguaçu
+,
+REBIO
+
+
+do Tinguá;
+
+14–16.II.2020
+
+; Souza-Dias,
+P. Siqueira
+, A.M. legs.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32489
+,
+MNRJ-ENT6-32490
+].
+One female
+“Viçosa,
+M.G. Brasil
+;
+Vanetti
+leg.” [
+UFVB
+].
+
+Males
+:
+
+One male
+“Campos do Jordão. S.P.
+
+7.XII.1926
+
+;
+Spitz
+col.” “
+alotipo
+haud descriptus” [
+MELQ
+].
+One male
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Mendes
+,
+Centro Marista São José
+das
+Paineiras
+;
+
+27/IV-1/
+V
+
+
+
+/2011;
+Manual
+;
+Nessimian
+et al.
+leg.” [
+DZRJ
+ORT0088
+].
+One male
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Mendes
+,
+Centro Marista São José
+das
+Paineiras
+;
+
+14–19/
+V
+
+
+
+/2013;
+Manual
+;
+Vozniak, J.
+leg.” [
+DZRJ
+ORT0213
+].
+One male
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Mendes
+,
+Centro Marista São José
+das
+Paineiras
+;
+
+14–19/
+V
+
+
+
+/2013;
+Manual
+;
+Aguilar, B.
+leg” [
+DZRJ
+ORT0211
+].
+One male
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Nova Iguaçu
+,
+REBIO
+
+
+do
+Tinguá
+;
+
+26–27.XI.2019
+
+;
+Souza-Dias P.
+leg.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32199
+].
+One male
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Rio
+das
+Ostras
+,
+REBIO
+
+
+União
+;
+22°25’31S
+42°02’21”W
+;
+
+21–25.II.2022
+
+;
+Disciplina
+PPGZoo—
+Souza Dias
+& equipe legs.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32484
+].
+Two males
+“
+BRASIL
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Itatiaia, PN
+_
+Itatiaia
+; 22°27’1510”S 44°36’6410”W;
+
+809m
+
+
+11–13.II.2019
+
+; Souza-Dias, PGB, Siqueira, A.M., Pereira, TPL legs.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32487
+,
+MNRJ-ENT6-32488
+].
+One male
+“Brasil
+RJ
+, Cachoeiras de Macacu, Res. Ecológica do Guapiaçu;
+22°27’5”S
+42°46’19”W
+,
+
+30–40m
+
+;
+
+13–16.XI.2021
+
+; Disciplina PPGZoo—Souza Dias & equipe legs.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32495
+].
+One male
+“
+Rebio União
+,
+Rio das Ostras
+,
+RJ
+
+;
+
+
+06–10/ IX/2019
+
+; M.
+Targino
+J.
+Miguel
+legs.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32486
+].
+One male
+“
+Viçosa
+, M.G.
+Brasil
+;
+Vanetti
+leg.” [
+UFVB
+].
+One male
+“
+Viçosa, M.G
+.
+Brasil
+; 11.38;
+Snipes
+leg.” [
+UFVB
+]
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF4850CDEBCFCDDFC3F108B.xml b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF4850CDEBCFCDDFC3F108B.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..26967a00b4a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF4850CDEBCFCDDFC3F108B.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,726 @@
+
+
+
+Comments on Neoconocephalus Karny, 1907 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Conocephalinae) species described by Salvador de Toledo Piza Jr.: The first contribution to the knowledge of South American species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Antunes, André Fonseca
+Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Souza-Dias, Pedro G. B.
+Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Takiya, Daniela Maeda
+Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+363
+393
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+1175-5326
+14853407
+007DEADA-1E12-4B21-9682-EF208DF71DC7
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus boraceanus
+Piza, 1983
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs. 3
+,
+17
+,
+18C–D
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus boraceanus
+Piza, 1983
+
+. Piza Jr. (1983): 111 [Description];
+
+Chamorro-Rengifo & Braun (2010)
+: 43
+
+[Catalog].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+locality.
+
+Estação Biológica de Boracéia
+,
+Salesópolis
+,
+São Paulo
+,
+Brazil
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+Head semioval in frontal view (
+Fig. 3E, M
+); fastigium of vertex trapezoidal in frontal view, two times longer than scapus length, base three times wider than scapus width (
+Fig. 3C, D, E, K, L, M
+); and pronotum lateral lobe as long as wide (
+Fig. 3C, K
+).
+
+
+
+
+Redescription.
+Head:
+Semioval in frontal view (
+Fig. 3E, M
+); fastigium of vertex trapezoidal in frontal view, two times longer than scapus length, base three times wider than scapus width, tooth weakly projected at basal portion of fastigium (
+Fig. 3C, D, E, K, L, M
+); fastigium of frons projected, rounded (
+Fig. 3E, M
+).
+Thorax:
+Pronotum anterior margin almost straight, posterior margin slightly convex (
+Fig. 3D, L
+); lateral lobe as long as wide, anterior margin of lateral lobe straight followed by smooth curve with lower margin almost straight, margin of humeral sinus rounded, invagination of humeral sinus concave (
+Fig. 3C, K
+).
+Wings:
+Tegmen with the basal region weakly narrower than apical region (
+Fig. 3B, J
+).
+Legs:
+Foreleg genicular lobe with rounded apex, tympanum with three distinct regions: proximal one rounded and closed, median one with a pair of open longitudinal slits, and apical one closed, tibia with six pairs of ventral spines; midleg femur with two pairs of small spines, genicular lobe triangular with inner side with acute apex and outer side with apex rounded, tibia with sex pairs of ventral spines; hindleg with femur with 11 pairs of short ventral spines, genicular lobe little developed and slightly curved, tibia dorsally with approximately 22 inner spines and 21 outer spines, in addition to two pairs of spurs, ventrally with nine pairs of small alternating spines.
+
+Color
+:
+
+Living specimens mostly green (
+Fig. 18C–D
+). Specimens studied green with some parts yellow.
+Type
+specimens yellow with apical area of wings light green; black on ventral surface of tarsi and frontal area of apex fastigium (
+Figs. 3E, M
+).
+
+
+Description of male.
+Tegmen
+: Stridulatory area with two distinct elevated transverse regions, anterior one oval and posterior one rounded (
+Fig. 3F
+).
+
+Cercus
+:
+
+Dorsal lobe with spine measuring half the length of lobe, ventral lobe two times longer than dorsal lobe (
+Figs. 3G, H
+).
+
+
+Description of female.
+Subgenital plate:
+Posterior margin concave and with a pair of pseudo-styled projections (
+Fig. 3N
+).
+Ovipositor:
+Almost reaching the tegmen apex (
+Fig. 3J
+).
+
+
+Measurements:
+Female
+holotype
+: BdL 28.1(25.0); FL 1.5; PdL 8.0(8.0); TegL 45.9(44.0); FlegL 8.2; HlegL 25.1(26.3); OvL 28.1(27.0). Females (n=16): BdL 27.9–30.1; FL 1.5–1.6; PdL 7.8–8.4; TegL 43.2–48.0; FlegL 7.9–8.1; HlegL 24.6–28.1; OvL 27.3–29.1. Males (n=5): BdL 23.9–28.1; FL 1.5–1.6; PdL 8.4–8.9; TegL 35.3–37.9; FlegL 6.1–6.3; HlegL 19.9–22.2.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+Brazil
+:
+Minas Gerais
+[
+new record
+],
+São Paulo
+,
+Rio de Janeiro
+[
+new record
+], and
+Paraná
+[
+new record
+] states.
+
+
+
+FIGURE 3.
+
+Neoconocephalus boraceanus
+Piza, 1983
+
+. (A–H) Male specimen deposited in MNRJ. (A) dorsal habitus; (B) lateral habitus; (C) head and thorax, in lateral view; (D) head, in dorsal view; (E) head, in frontal view; (F) stridulatory area; terminalia, in lateral (G) and (H) ventral views. (I–O) Female holotype of
+
+N. boraceanus
+
+deposited in MELQ. (I) dorsal habitus; (J) lateral habitus; (K) head and thorax, in lateral view; (L) head, in dorsal view; (M) head, in frontal view; (N) terminalia, in ventral view; (O) specimen labels.
+
+
+
+Taxonomic notes.
+This species is most similar with
+
+N. irroratus
+(
+Burmeister, 1838
+) However
+
+,
+
+N. boraceanus
+
+can be distinguished from
+
+N. irroratus
+
+by its fastigium base tooth weakly projected (
+Figs. 3C, E, K, M
+) and wings with basal region weakly narrower than apical region (
+Figs. 3B, J
+) (fastigium base tooth projected and wing basal and apical regions equally long in
+
+N. irroratus
+
+).
+Piza (1983)
+described a female
+holotype
+and a male
+allotype
+, but the latter does not belong to
+
+N. boraceanus
+
+(see
+
+N. corumbaensis
+
+below).
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+Neoconocephalus boraceanus
+
+:
+
+female
+holotype
+“Est. Biol. Boraceia; Salesópolis—S.P.;
+
+25-II-1963
+
+W. Werner
+&
+H. Reichardt
+col.” [
+MELQ
+]
+
+.
+
+
+Additional material.
+Females
+:
+
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Piraí
+,
+Sítio Dom Carlos
+;12°22’33” 30°01’01”;
+
+09.IV.2011
+
+;
+Manual
+;
+Gomberg
+, D.;
+Silva
+, M.M.S. legs” [
+DZRJ
+ORT1357
+].
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Mendes
+,
+Centro Marista São José
+das
+Paineiras
+;
+
+15–19/IV/2009
+
+;
+Manual
+;
+Maia, M.C.
+leg.” [
+DZRJ
+ORT0070
+].
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Mendes
+,
+Centro Marista São José
+das
+Paineiras
+;
+
+25–29/IV/2012
+
+;
+Manual
+;
+Takiya, D.M.
+leg.” [
+DZRJ
+ORT0069
+].
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Mendes
+,
+Centro Marista São José
+das
+Paineiras
+;
+
+14–19/
+V
+
+
+
+/2013;
+Manual
+;
+Matos, E.
+leg.” [
+DZRJ
+ORT0205
+].
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Mendes
+,
+Centro Marista São José das Paineiras
+;
+
+14–19.
+V/2013
+
+
+;
+
+Bruner
+et al.
+legs.” [
+DZRJ
+ORT0207
+].
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Mendes
+,
+Centro Marista São José
+das
+Paineiras
+;
+
+27–31/
+V
+
+
+
+/2014;
+Manual
+;
+Costa, B.B.
+leg.” [
+DZRJ
+ORT0772
+].
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Itatiaia
+, PNI,
+Trilha do Hotel Donati
+;
+
+6/II/2021
+
+;
+Antunes
+et al.
+legs.” [
+DZRJ
+ORT1232
+].
+One female
+“
+Botafogo
+
+;
+
+Distrito Federal
+Brasil
+;
+
+II.1958
+
+;
+L.C. Alvarenga
+leg.” [
+DZUP 366697
+].
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+
+,
+
+PR
+,
+Antonina, RPPN Guaricica, Trilha
+dos fornos,
+
+167m
+
+;
+25.298S
+48.657W
+;
+
+04.II.2022
+
+;
+H. Barros
+leg.” [
+DZUP 367110
+].
+One female
+“
+BR
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Nova Iguaçu
+,
+Rebio Tinguá
+;
+
+14–16.II.2020
+
+;
+Souza-Dias
+e
+Lima
+legs.” [
+MNRJ
+].
+Two females
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Rio
+das
+Ostras
+,
+REBIO
+
+
+União
+;
+22°25’31S
+42°02’21”W
+;
+
+21–25.II.2022
+
+;
+Disciplina
+PPGZoo—
+Souza Dias
+& equipe legs.” [
+MNRJ
+].
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Itatiaia, PN
+_
+Itatiaia
+; 22°27’1510”S 44°36’6410”S
+
+809 m
+
+;
+
+11–13.II.2019
+
+;
+Souza-Dias
+, PGB,
+Siqueira
+A.M. legs.” [
+MNRJ
+].
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Nova Iguaçu
+,
+REBIO
+
+
+do
+Tinguá
+;
+
+26–27.XI.2019
+
+;
+Souza-Dias, P.
+leg.” [
+MNRJ
+]
+
+.
+
+One female
+“Cel. Pacheco.
+MG
+;
+Água Limpa
+; 12/11/41;
+Vasco Gomes
+leg.” [
+UFVB
+]
+
+.
+
+One female
+“
+Viçosa, M.G.
+Brasil
+;
+Vanetti
+leg.” [
+UFVB
+].
+
+Males
+:
+
+One male
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Itatiaia
+,
+Lago Azul
+;
+
+21/X/2018
+
+;
+Manual
+;
+Freitas
+, A.S. &
+Ferreira
+, A.L.D. legs.” [
+DZRJ
+ORT0908
+].
+One male
+“
+Muriqui
+,
+Est. do Rio.
+Brasil
+;
+
+20.III.1960
+
+;
+M. Alvarenga
+leg.” [
+DZUP
+].
+Two males
+“
+BR
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Nova Iguaçu
+,
+Rebio Tinguá
+;
+
+14–16.II.2020
+
+;
+Souza-Dias
+e
+Lima
+legs.” [
+MNRJ
+].
+One male
+“
+Viçosa, M.G.
+Brasil
+;
+Vanetti
+leg.” [
+UFVB
+]
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF68502DEBCFBA1FC4C1293.xml b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF68502DEBCFBA1FC4C1293.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5fbc59d34f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF68502DEBCFBA1FC4C1293.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+
+
+
+Comments on Neoconocephalus Karny, 1907 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Conocephalinae) species described by Salvador de Toledo Piza Jr.: The first contribution to the knowledge of South American species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Antunes, André Fonseca
+Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Souza-Dias, Pedro G. B.
+Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Takiya, Daniela Maeda
+Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+363
+393
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+1175-5326
+14853407
+007DEADA-1E12-4B21-9682-EF208DF71DC7
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus corumbaensis
+Piza, 1969
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs. 4
+,
+17
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus corumbaensis
+Piza, 1969
+
+. Piza Jr. (1969): 117 [Description];
+
+Paschoal & Barros (1977)
+: 241
+
+[Catalog];
+
+Chamorro-Rengifo & Braun (2010)
+: 43
+
+[Catalog].
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+locality.
+
+Corumbá
+,
+Mato Grosso do Sul
+,
+Brazil
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+Head semioval in frontal view (
+Fig. 4E
+); fastigium of vertex semicircular in frontal view, two times longer than scapus length, base three times wider than scapus width (
+Figs. 4C, D, E
+); pronotum lateral lobe as long as wide, without evident separation of anterior and lower margins (
+Fig. 4C
+); tegmen with basal and apical regions equally wide, median region widest.
+
+
+
+
+Redescription.
+Head:
+Semioval in frontal view (
+Fig. 4E
+); fastigium of vertex semicircular in frontal view, two times longer than scapus length, base three times wider than scapus width, tooth projected at basal portion of fastigium (
+Figs. 4C, D, E
+); fastigium of frons little projected, rounded (
+Fig. 4E
+).
+Thorax:
+Pronotum anterior margin almost straight, posterior margin convex (
+Fig. 4A
+); lateral lobe as wide as long, anterior margin of lateral lobe slightly rounded, without evident separation from lower margin, margin of humeral sinus rounded, invagination of humeral sinus concave (
+Fig. 4C
+).
+Wings:
+Tegmen with basal and apical region equally wide (
+Fig. 4B
+).
+Legs:
+Foreleg genicular lobe with triangular apex, tympanum with three distinct regions: proximal one circular, median one with a pair of open longitudinal slits, and apical one closed, tibia with five ventral spines of inner margin; midleg genicular lobe triangular with inner side with acuminate apex and outer side with rounded apex, tibia with seven pairs of ventral spines; hindleg with femur ventrally with nine inner spines and six outer spines, genicular lobe little developed, tibia dorsally with approximately 21 inner spines and 24 outer spines, ventrally with 11 pairs of alternating spines.
+
+Color
+:
+
+Holotype
+light brown,
+allotype
+light green with to yellow; black on ventral surface of tarsi and frontal area of apex fastigium.
+
+
+Description of male.
+Tegmen
+: Stridulatory area with single elevated transverse region long and narrow with median furrow throughout length (
+Fig. 4F
+).
+
+Cercus
+:
+
+Dorsal lobe with spine measuring half the length of lobe, ventral lobe two times longer than dorsal lobe (
+Figs. 4G, H
+).
+
+
+Measurements:
+Male
+holotype
+: BdL 33.8(35.0); FL 1.7; PdL 9.4(9.8); TegL 49.1(50.0); FlegL 8.0; HlegL 28.3(29.5). Male: BdL 26.8; FL 1.7; PdL 8.1; TegL 42.9; FlegL 6.9.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+Brazil
+:
+Mato Grosso do Sul
+and
+São Paulo
+[new record] states
+.
+
+
+
+FIGURE 4.
+
+Neoconocephalus corumbaensis
+Piza, 1969
+
+. (A–I) Male holotype of
+
+N. corumbaensis
+
+deposited in MELQ. (A) dorsal habitus; (B) lateral habitus; (C) head and thorax, in lateral view; (D) head, in dorsal view; (E) head, in frontal view; (F) stridulatory area; terminalia, in dorsal (G) and (H) ventral views; (I) specimen labels. (J–R) Male allotype of
+
+N. boraceanus
+
+deposited in MELQ. (J) dorsal habitus; (K) lateral habitus; (L) head and thorax, in lateral view; (M) head, in dorsal view; (N) head, in frontal view; (O) stridulatory area; terminalia, in lateral (P) and (Q) ventral views; (R) specimen labels.
+
+
+
+Taxonomic notes.
+This species is most similar with
+
+N. maculosus
+(
+Redtenbacher, 1891
+)
+
+and
+
+N. spiza
+Walker & Greenfield, 1983
+
+. However,
+
+N. corumbaensis
+
+can be distinguished from
+
+N. maculosus
+
+by the space between fastigium of vertex and fastigium of frons measuring approximately half of scapus length (
+Fig. 4C
+) (one third of scapus length in
+
+N. maculosus
+
+), and from
+
+N. spiza
+
+by its stridulatory area occupying half the width of tegmen (
+Fig. 4F
+) (two thirds of tegmen width in
+
+N. spiza
+
+).
+
+
+The male
+allotype
+of
+
+N. boraceanus
+
+is herein considered conspecific to the
+holotype
+of
+
+N. corumbaensis
+
+(
+Fig. 4J–R
+).
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+Neoconocephalus corumbaensis
+
+:
+
+male
+holotype
+“21.I.68; Corumbá; M.
+T
+;
+K. Oeshiro
+” [
+MELQ
+].
+
+Neoconocephalus boraceanus
+
+: male
+paratype
+“Est. Biol. Boraceia; Salesópolis, SP.
+
+850m
+
+;
+J. Oliveira Santos
+col.;
+
+10–15.MAR.1963
+
+” “
+
+Neoconocephalus boraceanus
+Piza
+
+alótipo
+” [
+MELQ
+]
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF88500DEBCFDD9FB771481.xml b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF88500DEBCFDD9FB771481.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b9a997a7286
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFF88500DEBCFDD9FB771481.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,644 @@
+
+
+
+Comments on Neoconocephalus Karny, 1907 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Conocephalinae) species described by Salvador de Toledo Piza Jr.: The first contribution to the knowledge of South American species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Antunes, André Fonseca
+Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Souza-Dias, Pedro G. B.
+Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Takiya, Daniela Maeda
+Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+363
+393
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+1175-5326
+14853407
+007DEADA-1E12-4B21-9682-EF208DF71DC7
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus curitibensis
+Piza, 1952
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs. 5
+,
+6
+,
+17
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus curitibensis
+Piza, 1952
+
+. Piza Jr. (1952): 246 [Description];
+
+Paschoal & Barros (1977)
+: 241
+
+[Catalog];
+
+Chamorro-Rengifo & Braun (2010)
+: 43
+
+[Catalog].
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus rioclarensis
+Piza, 1975
+
+. Piza Jr. (1975): 355 [Description];
+Chamorro-Rengifo & Braun (2010)
+: 43 [Catalog];
+Fianco, Szinwelski & Faria (2022)
+:17 [Record]; Fianco (2023):1099 [Record].
+syn. nov.
+(
+Fig. 5 A–I
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+locality.
+
+Curitiba
+,
+Paraná
+,
+Brazil
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+Robust body (
+Figs. 5A, B, I, J
+,
+6A, B
+); head oval in frontal view (
+Figs. 5E, N
+,
+6E
+); fastigium of vertex semicircular in frontal view, two and a half times longer than scapus length, base three and half times wider than scapus width (
+Figs. 5C, D, E, L, M, N
+,
+6C, D, E
+); pronotum lateral lobe longer than wide (
+Figs. 5C, L
+,
+6C
+).
+
+
+
+
+Redescription.
+Head:
+Oval in frontal view (
+Figs. 5E, N
+,
+6E
+); fastigium of vertex semicircular in frontal view, two and a half times longer than scapus length, base three and a half times larger than scapus width, tooth projected at basal portion of fastigium (
+Figs. 5C, D, E, L, M, N
+,
+6C, D, E
+); fastigium of frons projected, rounded (
+Figs. 5E, N
+,
+6E
+).
+Thorax:
+Pronotum anterior margin almost straight and posterior margin slightly convex (
+Figs. 5D, M
+,
+6D
+); lateral lobe longer than wide, anterior margin of lateral lobe almost straight followed by a smooth curve with lower margin almost straight, margin of humeral sinus very rounded and very marked, invagination of humeral sinus in an open V-shaped (
+Figs. 5C, L
+,
+6C
+).
+Wings:
+Tegmen with basal and apical region equally wide (
+Figs. 5B, K
+,
+6B
+).
+Legs:
+Foreleg genicular lobe little developed and triangular, tympanum with three distinct regions: proximal one circular and closed, median one with a pair of open longitudinal slits, and apical one circular and open; midleg with femur with two ventral small spines, genicular lobe little developed with inner side with acute apex and outer side with rounded apex, tibia with approximately six pairs of ventral spines; hindleg femur ventrally with 10 inner spines and six outer spines, genicular lobe little developed, tibia dorsally with approximately 17 inner spines and 21 outer spines, in addition two pairs of spurs, ventrally with seven pairs of spines.
+
+Color
+:
+
+Living specimens green with apical region of tegmen yellowish green or brown.
+Type
+and additional specimens green or brown; black on ventral surface of tarsi, joints of legs, and frontal area of the fastigium of vertex.
+
+
+Description of male.
+Tegmen
+: Stridulatory area with two distinct elevated transverse regions, anterior one long with median furrow and posterior one with a small callous projection (
+Figs. 5F
+,
+6F
+).
+
+Cercus
+:
+
+dorsal lobe with spine measuring one third the length of lobe, ventral lobe two times longer than dorsal lobe (
+Figs. 5G, H
+,
+6G, H
+).
+
+
+Description of female.
+Subgenital plate:
+Posterior margin deeply concave and with pair of triangular projections (
+Fig. 5O
+).
+Ovipositor:
+Slightly extending beyond tegmen apex (
+Fig. 5K
+).
+
+
+Measurements:
+Female
+holotype
+: BdL 33.7(35.0); FL 2.4(2.0); PdL 9.8(10.0); TegL 51.6(51.0); FlegL 9.2; HlegL 28.7(28.0); OvL 38.3(36.0). Females (n=3): BdL 28.1–33.3; FL 2.1–2.6; PdL 9.2–9.8; TegL 48.3–50.1; FlegL 8.7–9.3; HlegL 26.5–27.9; OvL 36.9–39.1. Males (n=11): BdL 26.4–27.2; FL 1.5–1.8; PdL 8.8–9.2; TegL 41.8–44.3; FlegL 6.2–7.0; HlegL 22.0–22.4.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+Minas Gerais
+[
+new record
+],
+Paraná
+,
+Rio de Janeiro
+[
+new record
+], and
+São Paulo
+states.
+
+
+Taxonomic notes.
+This species is most similar with
+
+N. cylindricus
+(
+Karny, 1907
+)
+
+,
+
+N. dispar
+(
+Karny, 1907
+)
+
+, and
+
+N. exaltatus
+(
+Walker, 1869
+)
+
+. However,
+
+N. curitibensis
+
+can be distinguished from
+
+N. cylindricus
+
+by its pronotum lateral lobe with sinus humeral rounded and very marked (
+Figs. 5C, L
+,
+6C
+) and ovipositor extending beyond tegmen apex (
+Fig. 5K
+) (sinus humeral concave and ovipositor not reaching the tegmen in
+
+N. cylindricus
+
+); from
+
+N. dispar
+
+by presence of space between fastigium of vertex and fastigium of frons (
+Figs. 5C, L
+,
+6C
+) and tegmen with basal and apical equally wide (
+Figs. 5B, K
+,
+6B
+) (space between fastigium of vertex and fastigium of frons absent and tegmen with apical region narrower than basal region in
+
+N. dispar
+
+); and from
+
+N. exaltatus
+
+by the pronotum lateral lobe with smooth curvature between anterior and lower margin (
+Figs. 5C, L
+,
+6C
+) and stridulatory area with anterior elevated region measuring one third of tegmen width (
+Fig. 5F
+) (pronotum lateral lobe with sharp curvature between anterior and lower margin and stridulatory area with anterior elevated region measuring half of tegmen width in
+
+N. exaltatus
+
+).
+
+
+
+FIGURE 5.
+
+Neoconocephalus curitibensis
+Piza, 1952
+
+. (A–I) Male holotype of
+
+N. rioclarensis
+
+deposited in MELQ. (A) dorsal habitus; (B) lateral habitus; (C) head and thorax, in lateral view; (D) head, in dorsal view; (E) head, in frontal view; (F) stridulatory area; terminalia, in lateral (G) and (H) ventral views; (I) specimen labels. (J–P) Female holotype of
+
+N. curitibensis
+
+deposited in MELQ. (J) dorsal habitus; (K) lateral habitus; (L) head and thorax; in lateral view; (M) head, in dorsal view; (N) head, in frontal view; (O) terminalia, in ventral view; (P) specimen labels.
+
+
+
+The male
+holotype
+of
+
+N. rioclarensis
+
+
+syn. nov.
+
+is herein considered conspecific to
+
+N. curitibensis
+
+. Observing the type material of two species, important diagnostic similarities were observed, such as, robust body, being one of the largest
+
+Neoconocephalus
+species
+
+(
+Figs. 5A, B, J, K
+,
+6A, B
+); oval head, in frontal view (
+Figs. 5E, N
+,
+6E
+); similar sized fastigium of vertex base width and fastigium of vertex length (
+Figs. 5C, D, E, L, M, N
+,
+6C, D, E
+); and thorax notoriously wider in comparison with the rest of the body (
+Figs. 5A, J
+,
+6A
+). Additionally, the male
+holotype
+of
+
+N. rioclarensis
+
+
+syn. nov.
+
+shares with identified males of
+
+N. curitibensis
+
+the same number and disposition of elevated regions on the stridulatory area (
+Figs. 5F
+,
+6F
+).
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 6.
+
+Neoconocephalus curitibensis
+Piza, 1952
+
+. (A–H) Male specimen deposited in MNRJ. (A) dorsal habitus; (B) lateral habitus; (C) head and thorax, in lateral view; (D) head, in dorsal view; (E) head, in frontal view; (F) stridulatory area; terminalia, in dorso-lateral (G) and (H) ventral views.
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+Neoconocephalus curitibensis
+
+:
+
+female
+holotype
+“Curitiba;
+Or. Curiol II
+.45” [
+MELQ
+].
+
+Neoconocephalus rioclarensis
+
+
+syn. nov.
+
+: male
+holotype
+“
+Dr. Amilto Ferreira
+leg.;
+Rio Claro
+(S.P.); 10-X-70” [
+MELQ
+]
+
+.
+
+
+Additional material.
+Females
+:
+
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+,
+PR
+,
+Antonina, RPPN Guaricica, Trilha
+dos fornos,
+
+167m
+
+;
+25.298S
+48.657W
+;
+
+4.II.2022
+
+;
+H. Barros
+leg. [
+DZUP 367122
+]
+
+.
+
+One female
+“
+Brasil
+, SP,
+Biritiba Mirim
+,
+Estação Biológica de Boracéia
+;
+
+12–16.X.2016
+
+; Souza-Dias & equipe legs.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32129
+]
+
+.
+
+One female
+“Viçosa,
+MG
+,
+Brasil
+; 13/12/84; P.S.
+Fiuza F.
+leg.” [
+UFVB
+].
+
+Males
+
+
+:
+
+One male
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Itatiaia
+,
+BR485
+
+;
+
+
+13/X/2013
+
+;
+Rede
+de varredura;
+Takiya
+et al.
+legs” [
+DZRJ
+ORT0673
+].
+One male
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Itatiaia
+, PNI,
+Trilha
+do lago azul;
+
+27/ IX/2019
+
+;
+Antunes
+et al.
+legs” [
+DZRJ
+ORT1171
+].
+One male
+“
+Brasil
+,
+RJ
+
+,
+
+Itatiaia
+, PNI,
+Propriedade
+perto do lago azul;
+
+25–28.X.2019
+
+;
+Malaise
+;
+Antunes
+et al.
+legs” [
+DZRJ
+ORT1356
+].
+One male
+“
+Brasil
+,
+PR
+,
+Antonina, Res. Nat. Guaricica, Trilha da Rede.
+
+06–20.VII.2018
+
+;
+Malaise
+suspensa; G.A.
+R
+
+.
+
+Melo
+&
+R
+
+.
+
+Cavichioli
+legs.” [
+DZUP 367116
+].
+Four males
+“
+Brasil
+, SP, Biritiba Mirim, Estação Biológica de Boraceia;
+
+12–16.X.2016
+
+; Souza-Dias & equipe leg.” [
+MNRJ-ENT6-32107
+,
+MNRJ-ENT6-32130
+,
+MNRJ-ENT6-32131
+,
+MNRJ-ENT6-32132
+]
+
+.
+
+Two males
+“Viçosa.
+MG
+; 13/10/87; Exc. DB1 leg” [
+UFVB
+]
+
+.
+
+One male
+“Viçosa, M.G.
+Brasil
+; 20.3.63;
+Vanetti
+leg.” [
+UFVB
+]
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFFD8507DEBCFF08FE9114A5.xml b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFFD8507DEBCFF08FE9114A5.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6e157664821
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/59/52/87/595287BCFFFD8507DEBCFF08FE9114A5.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,394 @@
+
+
+
+Comments on Neoconocephalus Karny, 1907 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Conocephalinae) species described by Salvador de Toledo Piza Jr.: The first contribution to the knowledge of South American species
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Antunes, André Fonseca
+Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil & Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Souza-Dias, Pedro G. B.
+Laboratório de Orthoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Takiya, Daniela Maeda
+Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+363
+393
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.4
+1175-5326
+14853407
+007DEADA-1E12-4B21-9682-EF208DF71DC7
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus gaucho
+Piza, 1969
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs. 7
+,
+17
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus gaucho
+Piza, 1969
+
+. Piza Jr. (1969): 39 [Description];
+
+Paschoal & Barros (1977)
+: 241
+
+[Catalog];
+
+Chamorro-Rengifo & Braun (2010)
+: 43
+
+[Catalog].
+
+
+
+
+Neoconocephalus creusae
+Piza, 1970
+
+. Piza Jr. (1970): 127 [Description];
+Paschoal & Barros (1977)
+: 241 [Catalog];
+Chamorro-Rengifo & Braun (2010)
+: 43 [Catalog].
+syn. nov.
+(
+Fig. 7J–P
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+locality.
+
+Santa Maria
+,
+Rio Grande do Sul
+,
+Brazil
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+Thinner appearance (
+Figs. 7A, B, J, K
+); head conical in frontal view (
+Figs. 7E, N
+); fastigium of vertex conical in frontal view, two times longer than scapus length, base two times wider than scapus width (
+Figs. 7C, D, E, L, M, N
+); and lateral lobe of pronotum slightly longer than wide (
+Figs. 7C, L
+)
+
+
+
+
+Redescription.
+Head:
+Conical in frontal view (
+Figs. 7E, N
+); fastigium of vertex conical in frontal view, two times longer than scapus length, base two times wider than scapus width, tooth weakly projected in the basal portion of fastigium (
+Figs. 7C, D, E, L, M, N
+); fastigium of frons little projected, rounded (
+Figs. 7E, N
+).
+Thorax:
+Pronotum anterior margin almost straight and posterior margin almost convex (
+Figs. 7D, J
+); lateral lobe slightly longer than wide, anterior margin of lateral lobe almost straight followed by a smooth curve with lower margin almost straight, margin of humeral sinus rounded, invagination of humeral sinus weakly concave (
+Figs. 7C, L
+).
+Wings:
+Tegmen with basal and apical region equally wide (
+Figs. 7B, K
+).
+Legs:
+Foreleg femur with six pairs of ventral spines, genicular lobe little developed, triangular and with acute apex, tympanum with three distinct regions: proximal one circular and closed, median one with a pair of open longitudinal slits, and apical one closed; midleg genicular lobe triangular with inner side with acuminate apex and outer side little developed and with rounded apex, tibia with six pairs of spines; hindleg femur with 11 pairs of small ventral spines, genicular lobe little developed and slightly curved, tibia dorsally with 22 internal spines and 21 external spines, in addition to two pairs of spurs, ventrally with approximately nine pairs of small alternating spines.
+
+Color
+:
+
+Type and additional specimen (
+holotype
+of
+
+N. creusae
+
+) light brown; black maculae on ventral surface of tarsi.
+
+
+Description of male.
+Tegmen
+: Stridulatory area with two distinct slightly elevated transverse regions, anterior one long and posterior one almost half of tegmen length (
+Fig. 7F
+).
+
+Cercus
+:
+
+Dorsal lobe with spine measuring at least more than half the length of lobe, ventral lobe two times of dorsal lobe (
+Fig. 7G, H
+).
+
+
+Description of female.
+Subgenital plate:
+Posterior margin concave and with pair of small triangular projections (
+Fig. 7O
+).
+Ovipositor:
+almost reaching tegmen apex (
+Fig. 7K
+).
+
+
+Measurements:
+Male
+holotype
+: BdL 29.7(32.0); FL 1.5; PdL 8.1(8.0); TegL 36.0(36.0); FlegL 6.0; HlegL 15.9(16.0). Females (n=2): BdL 29.0–31.1; FL 2.2–2.3; PdL 6.8–7.0; TegL 41–5–42.1; FlegL 6.0–6.2; HlegL 17.1– 17.3; OvL 22.1–22.4.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+Brazil
+:
+Rio Grande do Sul
+and
+São Paulo
+[new record]
+states.
+
+
+Taxonomic notes.
+This species is most similar with
+
+N. americanus
+(
+Karny, 1907
+)
+
+,
+
+N. globifrons
+(
+Karny, 1907
+)
+
+,
+
+N. restrictus
+(
+Walker, 1869
+)
+
+, and
+
+N. testaceus
+(
+Redtenbacher, 1891
+)
+
+. Nevertheless,
+
+N. gaucho
+
+can be distinguished from
+
+N. americanus
+
+and
+
+N. globifrons
+
+by the fastigium of vertex basal tooth weakly projected (
+Fig. 7C, L
+) (well projected in
+
+N. americanus
+and
+N. globifrons
+
+), from
+
+N. restrictus
+
+by the pronotum lateral lobe with border not demarcated (
+Fig. 7C, L
+) and tegmen apex almost oblique (
+Fig. 7B, K
+) (pronotum lateral lobe with border strongly demarcated and tegmen apex almost straight in
+
+N. restrictus
+
+) and from
+
+N. testaceus
+
+by its fastigium apex 1/3 of fastigium base width (
+Fig. 7D, E, M, N
+) and invagination of humeral sinus weakly concave (
+Fig. 7C
+, KL (fastigium apex 2/3 of fastigium base width and invagination of humeral sinus deeply concave in
+
+N. testaceus
+
+).
+
+
+The female
+holotype
+of
+
+N. creusae
+
+
+syn. nov.
+
+is herein considered conspecific to
+
+N. gaucho
+
+, mainly by the size of fastigium of vertex base width (
+Fig. 7D, M
+); fastigium of vertex length (
+Fig. 7D, M
+); and wings with basal and apical region equally wide (
+Fig. 7B, K
+). Additionally, a female of
+
+N. gaucho
+
+collected at the type locality, deposited at MELQ was also studied, and based on the study of this specimen, the similarity of
+
+N. gaucho
+
+with the female
+holotype
+of
+
+N. creusae
+
+
+syn. nov.
+
+became even clearer.
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+Neoconocephalus gaucho
+
+:
+
+male
+holotype
+“Sta. Maria,
+R
+.
+S, D. Link
+leg.; 12.2.68” [
+MELQ
+].
+
+Neoconocephalus creusae
+
+
+syn. nov.
+
+: female
+holotype
+“
+A. Zamith
+; Araçatuba; 1-1970” [
+MELQ
+]
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Additional material
+.
+
+Females
+:
+One female
+“Sta. Maria; 16.III.72;
+A. Lang
+leg.” “
+Alótipo
+não descrito” [
+MELQ
+]
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/6D/0D/0D/6D0D0D69FFC0D90F1880FC017547FB62.xml b/data/6D/0D/0D/6D0D0D69FFC0D90F1880FC017547FB62.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bf5324629fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/6D/0D/0D/6D0D0D69FFC0D90F1880FC017547FB62.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
+
+
+
+Three New Species of Campsurus Eaton, 1868 (Ephemeroptera: Polymitarcyidae) and a List of Polymitarcyidae Banks, 1900 from Rondônia State, Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+De Lima, Claudia R. T.
+Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia (PPGEnt), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. & Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pós-Graduação (COPOG), Divisão do Curso em Entomologia (DiEnt), Coordenação de Biodiversidade (CoBio), Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. & Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Nascimento, Stênio R. S.
+Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia (PPGEnt), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. & Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pós-Graduação (COPOG), Divisão do Curso em Entomologia (DiEnt), Coordenação de Biodiversidade (CoBio), Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. & Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Luiza-Andrade, Ana
+Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Miranda, Margarida Vilaça
+Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil. & Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Lima, Lucas R. C.
+Universidade Estadual do Piauí (UESPI), Laboratório de Biodiversidade, Campos Herois do Jenipapo, Campo Maior, Piauí, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Almeida, Marciaandreia De Gois
+Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, (UEMA), Laboratório de Entomologia Aquática, Caxias, Maranhão, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Hamada, Neusa
+Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pós-Graduação (COPOG), Divisão do Curso em Entomologia (DiEnt), Coordenação de Biodiversidade (CoBio), Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Cruz, Paulo Vilela
+Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+505
+522
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.3
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.3
+1175-5326
+87CFA92D-3A2B-4228-8BF6-F7609E4BD424
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Campsurus machado
+
+sp. nov.
+De Lima, Cruz & Hamada
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figures 8A–I
+;
+9A–C
+)
+
+
+
+
+Type Material
+.
+
+Holotype
+: male imago (
+INPA
+) from
+Brazil
+;
+Rondônia
+;
+Machadinho
+D’oeste,
+Machado River
+, 2
+November
+waterfall,
+S08°54’27.77”
+,
+W062°10’36.53”
+,
+
+23.viii.2016
+
+, P.
+V
+.
+Cruz, N
+. Hamada, cols
+
+.
+
+Paratypes
+:
+3 male
+imagos (1 at
+INPA
+, 2 at
+ENT-UNIR
+), same data as holotype
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis
+. Male imago. 1) sternum IX with posterior margin triangular, elongated and sclerotized (
+Figs. 8C, F and G
+); 2) pedestal touching basally; inner projection subtriangular, short and robust, longer than wide; outer projection reduced, tapering towards the apex (
+Fig. 8G
+,
+9A
+); 3) base of each penis subtrapezoid (
+Figs. 8E and F
+,
+9A
+); 4) main lobe of penis sclerotized, with basal half expanded laterally, similar to ears, with fold facing dorsally (
+Figs. 8C–F
+,
+9A–C
+); 5) secondary lobe vestigial (
+Figs. 8C–F
+,
+9A and B
+).
+
+
+
+
+Description
+. Male imago. Length (n= 4, mm): body, 10.01–11.2; fore wing 10.6–11.4; hind wing 4.9–5.5 (none of the caudal filaments of the four species are completely intact). General coloration yellowish (
+Figs. 8A and B
+). Head yellowish, slightly shaded with gray between ocelli. Antennae whitish (
+Fig. 8A
+). Thorax. Pronotum translucent; meso and metanotum yellowish with shaded sutures; parapsidal suture and area between posteroscutal protuberances shaded; pros- meso and metasternum yellowish; mesofurcasternum yellowish, inner margin of the mesofurcasternal plate diverging on posterior 1/2 (
+Figs. 8A and B
+). Legs whitish. Wings. Forewing with membrane hyaline, area between veins C, Sc and R pigmented with white from the distal half; veins whitish; cross veins whitish. IMP1 connected directly to MP; ICuA1 connected directly to ICuA2. Hindwing with whitish veins. Abdomen whitish translucent, yellowing gradually from the terga VII–X (
+Fig. 8A
+). Abdominal sterna whitish medially, sterna VII–X yellowish (
+Fig. 8B
+). Genitalia. Sternum IX with posterior margin sclerotized, triangular and elongated (
+Figs. 8C and F
+,
+9A and C
+); pedestal touching basally; inner projection subtriangular, short and robust, longer than wide; outer projection reduced, tapering towards the apex (
+Fig. 8G
+,
+9A
+); forceps whitish; base of each penis subtrapezoid; main lobe of penis sclerotized, with basal half expanded laterally, similar to ears, with fold facing dorsally, sharply tapering towards the apex, curved ventrally; secondary lobe vestigial on inner margin of main lobe (
+Figs. 8C–F
+,
+9A–C
+). Paraproct subquadrate, large and not protruding (
+Figs. 8H and I
+). Caudal filaments translucent whitish.
+
+
+Female imago
+. unknown.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology
+. Name of the river in which the species was collected. Name in apposition.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+.
+Rondônia
+—
+Brazil
+.
+
+
+
+FIGURE 8.
+
+Campsurus machado
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+Male imago. A. dorsal view; B. ventral view; C. genitalia, ventrolateral view; D. genitalia, lateral view; E. genitalia, dorsal view; F. genitalia, ventral view; G. genitalia, ventral view on slide; H. paraproct ventral view, the shape expanded; I. paraproct lateral view, arrow indicating the expanded apex.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 9.
+
+Campsurus machado
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+Details of the male imago genitalia. A. ventral view, detail of the curved ventrally apex and base subtrapezoid; pedestals touching basally; B. dorsal view, detail of the dorsally facing fold and secondary lobe vestigial; C. ventrolateral view, detail of the main lobe with basal half expanded laterally, similar to ears and apex tapering sharply towards the apex ventrally.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution of
+Polymitarcyidae
+from
+Rondônia state
+
+
+
+We surveyed 10 sampling sites (
+Table 1
+), reporting 15 species of
+Campsuru
+s and
+
+Priasthenopus gilliesi
+(
+Domínguez 1988
+)
+
+(
+Table 2
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/6D/0D/0D/6D0D0D69FFCAD9021880FA4F7636FBEC.xml b/data/6D/0D/0D/6D0D0D69FFCAD9021880FA4F7636FBEC.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0ecd700a777
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/6D/0D/0D/6D0D0D69FFCAD9021880FA4F7636FBEC.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,338 @@
+
+
+
+Three New Species of Campsurus Eaton, 1868 (Ephemeroptera: Polymitarcyidae) and a List of Polymitarcyidae Banks, 1900 from Rondônia State, Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+De Lima, Claudia R. T.
+Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia (PPGEnt), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. & Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pós-Graduação (COPOG), Divisão do Curso em Entomologia (DiEnt), Coordenação de Biodiversidade (CoBio), Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. & Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Nascimento, Stênio R. S.
+Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia (PPGEnt), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. & Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pós-Graduação (COPOG), Divisão do Curso em Entomologia (DiEnt), Coordenação de Biodiversidade (CoBio), Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. & Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Luiza-Andrade, Ana
+Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Miranda, Margarida Vilaça
+Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil. & Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Lima, Lucas R. C.
+Universidade Estadual do Piauí (UESPI), Laboratório de Biodiversidade, Campos Herois do Jenipapo, Campo Maior, Piauí, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Almeida, Marciaandreia De Gois
+Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, (UEMA), Laboratório de Entomologia Aquática, Caxias, Maranhão, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Hamada, Neusa
+Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pós-Graduação (COPOG), Divisão do Curso em Entomologia (DiEnt), Coordenação de Biodiversidade (CoBio), Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Cruz, Paulo Vilela
+Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+505
+522
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.3
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.3
+1175-5326
+87CFA92D-3A2B-4228-8BF6-F7609E4BD424
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Campsurus fapero
+
+sp. nov.
+De Lima, Cruz & Hamada
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figures 2A–J
+;
+3A–D
+; 4A–E)
+
+
+
+
+Type Material
+.
+
+Holotype
+: male imago (
+INPA
+) from
+Brazil
+,
+Rondônia
+,
+
+Rolim
+de Moura
+
+, 192 waterfall, road 192 south, crossing pasture,
+S11°50’34.8”
+,
+W061°42’50.3”
+,
+
+15.viii.2022
+
+, C.
+R
+.
+T
+.
+De Lima, S
+.
+Nascimento, P.
+V
+.
+Cruz
+cols
+
+.
+Paratypes
+:
+66 male
+imagos,
+
+3 female
+imagoes (33 at
+INPA
+, 36 at
+ENT-UNIR
+), same data as holotype
+
+;
+
+11 male
+imagoes,
+Colorado
+D’oeste,
+Cabixi River
+, border with
+Mato Grosso state
+,
+S13°15’32.9”
+,
+W060°20’03.7”
+,
+
+19.viii.2022
+
+, C.
+R
+.
+T
+.
+De Lima, S
+.
+Nascimento, P.
+V
+.
+Cruz
+cols
+
+.;
+
+one male
+imago (
+INPA
+),
+Urupá
+,
+Urupá River
+, crossing pasture,
+S11°02’07.8”
+,
+W062°08’41.5”
+,
+
+23.viii.2022
+
+, C.
+R
+.
+T
+.
+De Lima, S
+.
+Nascimento, P.
+V
+.
+Cruz
+cols
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis
+. Male imago: 1) sternum IX with posterior margin straight to slightly convex (
+Figs. 2C, D and G
+); 2) pedestals distinctly separated in the middle; inner projection short and rounded; outer projection slightly longer and slender (
+Figs. 2C, E and G
+,
+3A
+); 3) base of each penis triangular (
+Figs. 2C, D, F and G
+); 4) main lobe of penis sclerotized, arising from the center of the base, slightly curved ventrally; apex of penis flat with small projection facing outwards (
+Figs. 2H
+,
+3B and D
+); 5) secondary lobe membranous, detached basally from the main lobe, arising from the outer margin (
+Figs. 2C, F and G
+). Female imago: 6) sternum VIII with a pair of short sockets fused on posterior margin; pair parallel, tapering towards the anterior margin with pointed apex (Figs. 4B–E).
+
+
+
+FIGURE 2.
+
+Campsurus fapero
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+Male imago. A. dorsal view; B. ventral view; C. genitalia, ventral view; D. genitalia, ventrolateral view; E. genitalia, detail of pedestal; F. genitalia, dorsal view; G. genitalia, ventral view, slide; H. genitalia, dorsolateral view; I. paraproct ventral view, arrow indicating the shape expanded; J. paraproct lateral view, arrow indicating the expanded apex.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 3.
+
+Campsurus fapero
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+Details of the male imago genitalia. A. ventral view, detail of the insertion of the secondary lobe on outer margin to the main lobe; pedestals distinctly separated in the middle; B. dorsolateral view, detail of the main lobe arising from the center of the base; C. ventrolateral view, detail of the main lobe apex, flat with small projection facing outwards; D. dorsal view, detail of the main lobe base.
+
+
+
+FIGURA 4.
+
+Campsurus fapero
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+Female imago. A. dorsal view; B. ventral view; C. sternum VIII, arrow indicating socket location; D. socket on slide, arrow indicating detail of the pair of short socket; E. socket illustrated.
+
+
+
+
+Description
+. Male imago. Length (n=10, mm): body, 8.0–8.9; fore wing, 7.9–8.3; hind wing, 3.5–3.9; cerci, 20.1–21.1. General coloration yellowish with grey areas (
+Fig. 2A
+). Head yellowish, shaded with black among ocelli; shaded slightly more diffuse on occipute, with medial pale mark; antennae shaded with gray (
+Fig. 2A
+). Thorax. Pronotum yellowish, lightly shaded with black; meso and metanotum yellowish, sutures blackish, parapsidal suture and area between posteroscutal protuberances shaded with black; prosternum yellowish; meso and metastenum yellowish; mesofurcasternum shaded with gray; mesofurcasternum plate shaded, with inner margin parallel (
+Figs. 2A and B
+). Legs. Fore, middle and hind legs whitish shaded with gray. Wings. Fore wing with membrane hyaline, opaque on C, Sc and R areas; veins Sc and R light brown in the basal 1/3; other veins whitish; cross veins whitish; IMP1 connected directly to MP; ICuA1 connected directly to ICuA2. Hind wing with whitish veins. Abdomen. Whitish, shaded with gray on terga I and II, III–VII, VIII–X darker (
+Fig. 2A
+). Abdominal sternum I yellowish shaded with gray, sterna II–VII whitish shaded with gray, sternum VIII darker, sternum IX shaded with gray (
+Fig. 2B
+). Genitalia. Sternum IX with posterior margin straight to slightly convex (
+Figs. 2C, D and G
+); pedestals distinctly separated in the middle; inner projection short and rounded; outer projection slightly longer and slender (
+Figs. 2C and G
+,
+3A
+); forceps whitish; base of each penis triangular; main lobe of penis sclerotized, arising from the center of the base, slightly curved ventrally, apex of penis flat with small projection facing outwards; secondary lobe membranous, cylindrical, with rounded apex, detached basally from the main lobe, arising from the outer margin (
+Figs. 2C–H
+,
+3A–D
+). Subquadrate paraproct, large and protruding (
+Figs. 2I and J
+). Caudal Filaments whitish translucent.
+
+
+Female imago
+(Figs. 4A–E). Length (n=3, mm): body, 9.2–9.9; fore wing, 9.9–10.1; hind wing, 4.1–4.5; cerci, 3.2–3.4. Wings hyaline, with whitish veins. Color pattern similar to male, except for fore wing with C, Sc and R veins light brown in the basal 2/3, tergites and sternites with less marked spots and not connected medially in all segments; sternum VIII with a pair of short sockets fused on posterior margin, pair parallel, tapering towards the anterior margin with pointed apex (Figs. 4B–D). Caudal filaments translucent whitish.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology
+. The name is a tribute to the Fundação
+Rondônia
+de Amparo ao Desenvolvimento das Ações Científicas e Tecnológicas e à Pesquisa no
+Estado de Rondônia
+(FAPERO), for providing opportunities and promoting Science in
+Rondônia
+. Noun in apposition.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+.
+Rondônia
+—
+Brazil
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/6D/0D/0D/6D0D0D69FFCFD90D1880FB46770FFC10.xml b/data/6D/0D/0D/6D0D0D69FFCFD90D1880FB46770FFC10.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..72c4d69720f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/6D/0D/0D/6D0D0D69FFCFD90D1880FB46770FFC10.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,365 @@
+
+
+
+Three New Species of Campsurus Eaton, 1868 (Ephemeroptera: Polymitarcyidae) and a List of Polymitarcyidae Banks, 1900 from Rondônia State, Brazil
+
+
+
+Author
+
+De Lima, Claudia R. T.
+Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia (PPGEnt), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. & Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pós-Graduação (COPOG), Divisão do Curso em Entomologia (DiEnt), Coordenação de Biodiversidade (CoBio), Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. & Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Nascimento, Stênio R. S.
+Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia (PPGEnt), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. & Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pós-Graduação (COPOG), Divisão do Curso em Entomologia (DiEnt), Coordenação de Biodiversidade (CoBio), Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. & Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Luiza-Andrade, Ana
+Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Miranda, Margarida Vilaça
+Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil. & Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Lima, Lucas R. C.
+Universidade Estadual do Piauí (UESPI), Laboratório de Biodiversidade, Campos Herois do Jenipapo, Campo Maior, Piauí, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Almeida, Marciaandreia De Gois
+Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, (UEMA), Laboratório de Entomologia Aquática, Caxias, Maranhão, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Hamada, Neusa
+Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pós-Graduação (COPOG), Divisão do Curso em Entomologia (DiEnt), Coordenação de Biodiversidade (CoBio), Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Cruz, Paulo Vilela
+Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UNIR), Departamento de Biologia, Coleção Entomológica, Laboratório de Biologia e Diversidade de Insetos (LaBDIn), Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+505
+522
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.3
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.3
+1175-5326
+87CFA92D-3A2B-4228-8BF6-F7609E4BD424
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Campsurus lacia
+
+sp. nov.
+De Lima, Cruz & Hamada
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figures 5A–I
+;
+6A–C
+;
+7A–E
+)
+
+
+
+
+Type Material
+.
+
+Holotype
+: male imago (
+INPA
+) from
+Brazil
+;
+Rondônia
+;
+Machadinho
+D’oeste,
+Machado River
+, 2
+November
+waterfall,
+S08°54’27.77”
+,
+W062°10’36.53”
+,
+
+08.vii.2018
+
+, P.
+V
+.
+Cruz, G
+.
+Desidério, N
+.
+Hamada, J. O.
+da Silva,
+Andrew Short
+, cols
+
+.
+Paratypes
+:
+20 male
+imagos,
+
+one female
+imago, (10 at
+INPA
+, 10 at
+ENT-UNIR
+), same data as holotype
+
+.
+
+Additional material.
+One male
+imago from
+Brazil
+,
+Maranhão
+,
+Caxias
+, fazenda
+Pé de Serra
+,
+Rio Itapecuru
+,
+S05°07’28.5”
+,
+W043°33’02.3”
+, 06.iv.14,
+S. Nascimento
+col.; 03 male imagoes (
+ENT-UNIR
+), from
+Brazil
+,
+Piauí
+,
+Campo Maior
+,
+São Gonçalo do Gurgueia
+,
+Comunidade do Arara
+,
+rio Gurgueia
+,
+S10°2’41.94”
+,
+W45°19’33.12”
+,
+
+24.vi.2024
+
+, L.
+R
+.
+C. Lima
+,
+S. Nascimento
+,
+S. E. C. Vitor
+, cols.; 03 male imagoes (
+ENT-UNIR
+), same data except date 08–09.viii.24 and cols. L.
+R
+.
+C. Lima
+,
+I. Gonçalves
+, C.
+R
+.
+T
+.
+de Lima
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis
+. Male imago: 1) sternum IX with posterior margin straight (
+Figs. 5C and G
+); 2) pedestal touching basally; inner projection subtriangular, short and robust, wider than long; outer projection reduced, tapering towards the apex (
+Figs. 5C and D
+,
+6A
+); 3) base of each penis subtrapezoid (
+Figs. 5C, D and F
+,
+6A and B
+); 4) main lobe of penis sclerotized, tapering towards the apex, longer than secondary lobe, slightly curved ventrally (
+Figs. 5C, E and G
+,
+6B
+); 5) secondary lobe membranous, positioned in front of the main lobe, straight, rounded apex with sparse setae (
+Figs. 5C–E and G
+,
+6A and B
+). Female imago: 6) sternum VIII with a pair of elongate, fused, apically rounded socket (
+Figs. 7A–E
+).
+
+
+
+
+Description
+. Male imago. Length (n=10, mm): body, 9.8–10.1; fore wing, 9.6–9.8; hind wing, 4.9–5.5; cerci, 22.1–23.1 (the additional material of
+Piauí
+were used for measurements and description for wings. All wings of the
+type
+material are broken). General coloration yellowish brown (
+Fig. 5A
+). Head yellowish, completely shaded with black dorsally, shaded with gray ventrally; antennae shaded with gray (
+Fig. 5A
+). Thorax. Pronotum whitish translucent, slightly shaded with gray; meso and metanotum yellowish, sutures blackish, parapsidal suture and area between posteroscutal protuberances slightly shaded with black; prosternum whitish, slightly shaded with gray; meso and metastenum yellowish; mesofurcastenum slightly shaded with gray, mesofurcasternum plate yellowish, with inner margin parallel (
+Figs. 5A and B
+). Legs. Foreleg, middle and hind legs shaded with gray. Wings. Fore wing with membrane hyaline; veins C, Sc and R light brown in the basal 1/3; other veins whitish; cross veins whitish; R whitish distally; IMP1 connected directly to MP; ICuA1 connected directly to ICuA2. Hind wing with whitish veins. Abdomen. Whitish translucent, slightly shaded with gray on terga III–VII; VIII–X darker (
+Fig. 5A
+). Abdominal sterna translucent, with yellowish sternum IX–X, slightly shaded with black (
+Fig. 5B
+). Genitalia. Sternum IX with posterior margin almost straight (
+Fig. 5C
+,
+6A and B
+); pedestal touching basally; inner projection subtriangular, short and robust, wider than long, with rounded apex; outer projection reduced, tapering towards the apex (
+Fig. 5D
+,
+6A
+); forceps whitish; base of each penis subtrapezoid; main lobe of penis sclerotized, slightly curved ventrally, tapering towards the apex; secondary lobe membranous, positioned in front of the main lobe, straight, shorter than main lobe, rounded apex with setae sparse (
+Figs. 5C–F
+,
+6A and B
+). Subcircular paraproct, shortened and not protruding (
+Figs. 5H–I
+). Caudal filaments translucent whitish.
+
+
+
+FIGURE 5.
+
+Campsurus lacia
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+Male imago. A. dorsal view; B. ventral view; C. genitalia, ventral view; D. genitalia, ventral view on slide; E. genitalia, detail of pedestal; F. genitalia, dorsal view; G. genitalia, ventrolateral view; H. paraproct ventral view, arrow indicating the shape shortened; I. paraproct ventrolateral view, arrow indicating the shape shortened.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 6.
+
+Campsurus lacia
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+Details of the male imago genitalia. A. ventral view, detail of the insertion of the secondary lobe, in front of the main lobe; pedestals touching basally; B. ventrolateral view, detail of the main lobe slightly curved ventrally, tapering towards the apex; C. dorsal view.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 7.
+
+Campsurus lacia
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+Female imago. A. dorsal view; B. ventral view; C. sternum VIII, arrow indicating socket location; D. socket on slide, arrow indicating detail pair of elongate and fused socket; E. socket illustrated.
+
+
+
+Female imago
+(
+Figs. 7A–E
+). Length (n=1, mm): body, 10.1; fore wing, 11.2; hind wing, 5.6; cerci, 3.8. Wings membranes hyaline, with whitish veins. Color pattern similar to male, except for fore wing with C, Sc and R veins and cross veins light brown in the basal 2/3; terga I to II slightly shaded gray, III–VII with well-defined dark posterior margin, VIII–IX shaded with gray (
+Fig. 7A
+). Sternum VIII with a pair of elongate, fused, apically rounded socket (
+Figs. 7C and D
+). Caudal filaments translucent whitish.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology
+. Tribute to Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos—LACIA (INPA), coordinated by Dr. Neusa Hamada, for promoting and fostering aquatic science expeditions throughout the Amazon and
+Brazil
+. Name in apposition.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+.
+Rondônia
+,
+Piauí
+,
+Maranhão
+—
+Brazil
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8801C464FF3EF8B4324E0AA6.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8801C464FF3EF8B4324E0AA6.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5920aef71f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8801C464FF3EF8B4324E0AA6.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Peregrinator biannulipes
+(Montrouzier & Signoret, 1861)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs. 16B–D
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: Originally described from
+New Caledonia
+, but now considered a cosmopolitan species (
+Maldonado 1990
+), commonly found in many areas of the Palearctic such as
+China
+,
+Japan
+, and
+Egypt
+(
+Aukema & Rieger 1996
+). In the Neotropical region it is so far known from
+Jamaica
+(
+Maldonado & Farr 1977
+),
+Cuba
+,
+Panama
+(
+Champion
+
+
+1899), and
+Trinidad and Tobago
+(
+GBIF 2024
+). Despite
+
+P. biannulipes
+
+being found in many countries around the world, it is the first time that this genus and species are formally recorded from
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 16
+. Habitus and detailed images of
+
+Aradomorpha championi
+
+and
+
+Peregrinator biannulipes
+
+. A.
+
+A. championi
+
+, dorsal view; B–D.
+
+P. biannulipes
+
+; B. dorsal view; C. detail of the head in lateral view; D. lateral view.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+
+Peregrinator biannulipes
+
+is the combination currently recognized as valid for this species, as it has been erroneously placed in
+Alloecranum
+Reuter, 1881 (
+Ghauri 1962
+). This species is commonly associated with stored grain because of its predatory habits over grain pest species (
+
+Awadallah
+et al.
+1984
+
+;
+Maldonado & Farr 1977
+). The examined specimens from Palmira were found in a warehouse (“bodega”), probably a grain warehouse, thus explaining its presence there. In contrast, the specimens from Gutierrez were collected on vegetation using an entomological net.
+
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+.
+Cundinamarca
+:
+
+1 ♂
+, Guiterrez, [vereda]
+El Carmen
+, finca los Arraynes,
+
+2500 m
+
+, en cultivo de frijol bola roja [= on red bean crop], on leaves, jama [=
+entomological net
+],
+
+29.ix.2003
+
+,
+J. Pardo
+(
+UNAB
+)
+
+.
+
+
+Valle del Cauca
+:
+
+7 ♂♂
+,
+3 ♀
+,
+Palmira
+,
+
+23.vii.1958
+
+, bodega [= warehouse],
+G. Bravo
+(
+CTNI
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8801C466FF3EFCF835470D02.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8801C466FF3EFCF835470D02.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5378762fabf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8801C466FF3EFCF835470D02.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Aradomorpha championi
+Lent & Wygodzinsky, 1944
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 16A
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: This species is known only from
+Brazil
+(
+Rio de Janeiro
+) (
+Lent & Wygodzinsky 1944
+;
+Maldonado 1990
+). It is a new generic and specific record from
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+
+Aradomorpha
+Champion, 1899
+
+is a seldom collected reduviid genus.
+Wygodzinsky (1949b)
+provided a key to the species of
+
+Aradomorpha
+
+based on the original descriptions of the species (
+Champion 1899
+;
+Costa Lima 1940
+;
+Lent & Wygodzinsky 1944
+). We identified the examined specimen as
+
+A. championi
+
+based on the small eyes not reaching the ventral margin of the head, the banded connexivum, and the similar width of the cells of the membrane of the hemelytron. Nonetheless, the head does not have a ventral, shallow, longitudinal medial excavation on the head, and the forefemur is not slender and the foretibia does have an apical dorsal spiniform process. The foreleg structure is more similar to what was described for
+
+A. chinai
+
+Costa Lima, 1940
+and
+
+A. crassipes
+Champion, 1899
+
+(
+Costa Lima 1940
+;
+Wygodzinsky 1949b
+), being the forefemur wider and the foretibia beset with a dorsoapical setiform process. When describing
+
+A. championi
+,
+Lent & Wygodzinsky (1944)
+
+illustrated the fore femora and foretibia in ventral views (see their figures 14 and 15), therefore, we cannot be sure if the tibial process if present or not. Their figure 1 (
+Lent & Wygodzinsky 1944
+) shows the foreleg in lateral view and the femur seems to be as wide as in the other species. Thus, we cannot draw conclusions based on the foreleg structure. Given that the Brazilian specimens of
+
+A. championi
+
+are all macropterous, with the hemelytra reaching the apex of the abdomen (
+Lent & Wygodzinsky 1944
+), and that the examined specimen is submacropterous (
+Fig. 16A
+), there is still the possibility that this specimen might represent a different, undescribed, species. Only with more specimens from the Caribbean coast from
+Colombia
+we will be able to address variability in all the characters mentioned above.
+
+
+
+Examined
+material
+
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+
+.
+
+Mag
+[dalena]
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Parque Tayrona, C
+. Kugler / abanico aluvial [= alluvial fan]
+Neguanje
+/ IAVH-E 188392 (
+IAVH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8801C466FF3EFF2C327D09DE.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8801C466FF3EFF2C327D09DE.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bb8ebb9b22d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8801C466FF3EFF2C327D09DE.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Zelus nigromaculatus
+Champion, 1899
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs. 15A–E
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: This species is known from
+Costa Rica
+and
+Panama
+(
+
+Zhang
+et al.
+2016
+
+). It is a new species record for
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+Both specimens were captured alive as fifth instar nymphs at understory of a dense rain forest at the foot of the mountain on the western slope of Paramillo Massif (Nudo de Paramillo), in the north of the West Andes of
+Colombia
+(
+Fig. 15E
+), and later bred until reaching the adult stage. This area has been strongly affected by extensive livestock farming and illegal logging. Both nymphs were located at the same plant (
+Melastomataceae
+) (
+Fig. 15C–D
+) along with two other nymphs, showing gregarious habit at this developmental stage as has been documented in other
+Harpactorinae
+. Adults resemble vespoid wasps (
+
+Zhang
+et al.
+2016
+
+), whereas nymphs, which exhibit the same banded leg color pattern, probably resemble
+Oxyopidae
+spiders (
+Fig. 15C–D
+).
+
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+
+.
+
+Antioquia
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Mutatá
+,
+Vereda San José de León
+,
+Finca La Soledad
+2,
+7.49502°N
+;
+76.51170°W
+,
+
+477 m
+
+,
+
+3–8.vii.2022
+
+,
+entomological net
+, day collecting, forest edge, J. Sauceda-V., I. Ceballos-C., A. Mejía-S.,
+J. C. Calderon.
+, CEUA 129221 (
+CEUA
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+, same data, CEUA 129222 (
+CEUA
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8809C469FF3EFC3033F209DE.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8809C469FF3EFC3033F209DE.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bff42c678e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8809C469FF3EFC3033F209DE.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,641 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Repipta sanguinea
+Champion, 1899
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs. 10A–D
+;
+12A–D
+;
+13A–E
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: This species was known only from
+Panama
+(
+Champion 1899
+;
+Maldonado 1990
+). It is a new species record from
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+As mentioned above,
+
+R. sanguinea
+
+was not treated in
+
+Martin-Park
+et al.
+(2012)
+
+.
+
+Repipta sanguinea
+
+is very similar to
+
+R. coccinea
+(
+Herrich-Schäffer,1850
+)
+
+, also from
+Colombia
+, because both are mostly reddish species.
+Herrich-Schäffer (1850)
+described
+
+R. coccinea
+
+as being brilliant red (“coccineus”), with a hyaline brown hemelytral membrane, dark antennae, red legs, and red pronotal spines. He also mentioned that in some specimens the antennae and legs might be darkened, and the pronotal spines might be red. When
+Champion (1899)
+described
+
+R. sanguinea
+
+, he failed to compare his new species to
+
+R. coccinea
+
+, although he mentioned that the pronotal spines were yellow apically, the inner (posterior) portion of the corium and part of the clavus yellowish, and the hemelytral membrane yellow; all these characters setting it apart from
+
+R. coccinea
+
+. When redescribing
+
+R. coccinea
+,
+
+Martin-Park
+et al.
+(2012)
+
+
+mentioned that the pronotal spines are yellowish, that leg color could be variable, and that the clavus is brown, and the membrane is hyaline brown. The latter two characters fit Herrich-Schäffer’s description. Because the specimens examined by us have a yellowish membrane and pronotal spines, and a reddish corium with a yellowish area between the corium and the clavus, it fits better the original description of
+
+R. sanguinea
+
+, thus assigning this identification to them.
+
+
+As stated above for
+
+R. lepidula
+
+, because genitalic morphology might be of diagnostic value for identification of species of
+
+Repipta
+
+, we are documenting the male and female genitalia of
+
+R. sanguinea
+
+. The pygophore is strongly setose caudally (
+Fig. 12
+); the paramere is L-shaped, and strongly setose, with long setae, in all its surface (
+Fig. 12A– C
+). The endosoma has a pair of rod-like, medial basal sclerotizations, about half as long as the dorsal phallothecal plate (
+Fig. 13A, B
+); the medial basal lobe has a pair of U-shaped areas beset with small triangular microtrichia, and an apical round field of similar trichia. The dorsal phallothecal plate is flat, elongated, and sharply rounded medially at the apex (
+Fig. 13C
+). The bursa copulatrix is quadrangular with two large ovoid lateral pouches (
+Fig. 13D–E
+); with no strong sclerotizations in the anterior area of the bursa where it connects to the median oviduct. Future work should document and carefully compare the genitalia of other
+
+Repipta
+species
+
+and reveal if
+
+R. sanguinea
+
+and
+
+R. coccinea
+
+are synonyms or valid species.
+
+
+
+FIGURE 10
+. Habitus images of
+
+Repipta sanguinea
+
+. A, B. male; A. dorsal view; B. lateral view; C, D. female; C. dorsal view; D. lateral view.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 11
+. Male genitalia of
+
+Repipta lepidula
+
+. A–D. pygophore; A. dorsal view; B. ventral view; C. caudal view; D. lateral left view; E–G. aedeagus; E. dorsal view; F. lateral left view; G. dorsal view, with dorsal phallothecal sclerite in focus.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 12
+. Male genitalia of
+
+Repipta sanguinea
+
+. A–D. pygophore; A. dorsal view; B. ventral view; C. caudal view; D. lateral left view.
+
+
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+
+.
+
+Antioquia
+
+:
+1 ♀
+, km 12
+Rio
+sucio,
+Restrepo
+,
+
+510 m
+
+,
+
+16.xi.1976
+
+,
+C. Bernal
+(
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Casanare
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Tauramena
+,
+Kiosco Verde
+, ~
+2.5 km
+al
+SW de Tauramena
+,
+5.00385°N
+72.77376°W
+
+,
+
+
+526 m
+
+,
+
+8–12.ix.2014
+
+, S.
+Tibabuzo
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+, same data,
+D. Forero
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+
+Cordoba
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Montelibano
+,
+7°59ˊ31.4˝N
+,
+75°24ˊ35.5˝W
+, wetland, manual collecting,
+H. González Pertuz
+/ MPUJ_ENT0075198 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Montelibano
+,PIRE –
+Humedal
+[= wetland], on vegetation,
+
+6.viii.2006
+
+,
+H.González Pertuz
+/MPUJ_ENT0075197 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Pto Libertador
+, CCSA, rastrojo [=scrub vegetation],
+entomological net
+,
+
+14.xi.2005
+
+,
+H. González Pertuz
+/ MPUJ_ENT0075196 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 adult
+, sex unknown (without abdomen),
+Tierralta
+,
+Hda. Las Brisas
+, las
+Mayorias
+, grassland,
+entomological net
+,
+
+9.iv.2005
+
+,
+H. González Pertuz
+/ MPUJ_ENT0075221 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+
+Cundinamarca
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Guaduas
+,
+
+5.vii.1976
+
+,
+A. Bernal
+(
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Meta
+
+:
+1 ♀
+, km 4 vía
+Acacias, C
+
+.
+
+Cordoba
+(
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Acacias
+,
+La Esmeralda
+,
+
+514 m
+
+,
+
+23.iv.2004
+
+,
+E. Flores
+(
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Vichada
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Gaviotas
+,
+
+167 m
+
+,
+
+20.vii.1973
+
+,
+R. Cortés
+(
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Meta
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+San Martín
+,
+Reserva el Caduceo
+,
+Km
+4.5 a
+San
+Francisco,
+03.671389°N
+73.659444°W
+
+,
+
+
+309 m
+
+,
+
+30.ix–4.x.2013
+
+, L.
+Camacho
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+, same data,
+
+30.ix–5.x.2013
+
+, P.
+Duarte
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+San Martín
+,
+Reserva Rey Zamuro-Matarredonda
+, ~
+
+37 km
+ESE de San Martin
+
+,
+03.53173°N
+73.40181°W
+
+,
+
+
+293 m
+
+,
+
+8–12.iv.2019
+
+, M.
+Camelo
+/ gallery forest, manual collecting / MPUJ_ENT0065820 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, same data,
+C. Salazar
+,
+L. Sáenz
+/ gallery forest, low vegetation, manual collecting / MPUJ_ENT0065696 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, same data,
+S. Ochoa
+,
+V. Páez
+,
+L. Rodríguez
+/
+Sabana
+[= savannah], manual collecting / MPUJ_ENT0065927 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+, same data,
+
+17–21.ix.2018
+
+, A.
+Zapata
+,
+D. Cancino
+,
+M. Jaimes
+/ edge of gallery forest, manual collecting / MPUJ_ENT0063483 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, same data,
+J. Molano
+,
+M. Rubiano
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, same data,
+
+28.viii–1.ix.2017
+
+, D.
+Cáceres
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+San Martín
+, vda.
+San
+Francisco, Finca Tocancipá, sabana [= savannah]
+
+,
+
+
+330 m
+
+,
+Romero
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+, same data, manual collecting,
+Gordillo
+,
+Murillo
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+, [
+Villavicencio
+]
+Apiay
+, granja experimental
+La Libertad
+, manual collecting,
+
+x.2000
+
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA880EC469FF3EFB4934E10D02.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA880EC469FF3EFB4934E10D02.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7e25a91004d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA880EC469FF3EFB4934E10D02.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Zelus championi
+Zhang & Hart, 2016
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 14C, D
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: This species is known from
+Costa Rica
+,
+Ecuador
+, and
+Panama
+(
+
+Zhang
+et al.
+2016
+
+). It is a new species record from
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+Finding this species in
+Colombia
+fills in the apparent gap in the distribution of this recently described species.The specimen was found in an urban area, part of the metropolitan area of the Aburrá Valley, although riparian vegetation exists nearby in La Doctora creek. The examined specimen was dissected to confirm its identification and agrees with the genitalic morphology for this species (
+
+Zhang
+et al.
+2016
+
+).
+
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+.
+Antioquia
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Sabaneta
+, barrio
+
+La Doctora
+
+,
+6°9ˊ2˝N
+75°36ˊ49˝W
+,
+
+1570 m
+
+, garden, manual collecting,
+
+1.v.2010
+
+,
+J. Castro
+, CEUA 99010 (
+CEUA
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA880EC469FF3EFD4034880FD6.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA880EC469FF3EFD4034880FD6.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0bfed4b889f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA880EC469FF3EFD4034880FD6.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Sosius foliaceus
+Champion, 1899
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs. 14A, B
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: This species was known from
+Mexico
+(
+Veracruz
+and
+Yucatán
+),
+Panama
+(Bugaba) (
+Champion 1899
+), and
+Brazil
+(
+Gil-Santana 2007
+). It is a new generic and species record from
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+
+Sosius
+Champion, 1899
+
+was revised by
+Maldonado & Carpintero (1993)
+, including two very similar species,
+
+S. foliaceus
+
+and
+
+S. australis
+Maldonado & Carpintero, 1993
+
+. The examined female specimen fits better the description of
+
+S. foliaceus
+
+given the structure and dimensions of the pronotum, which is almost as long as wide (length/width = 0.93). The examined specimen was found preying over other insects on a coffee plantation (
+Figs. 14A–B
+).
+
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+
+.
+
+Valle del Cauca
+
+:
+1 ♀
+, Ansermanuevo, depredador en café [= predator on coffee plantation],
+
+10.v.2017
+
+,
+M. Jiménez
+/ MEMB 201471 (
+MEMB
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8812C473FF3EF95434560F2E.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8812C473FF3EF95434560F2E.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5050494a6c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8812C473FF3EF95434560F2E.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,585 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Rhiginia conspersa
+Breddin, 1901
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs. 7A, B
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: This species is known from
+Panama
+,
+Colombia
+, and
+Ecuador
+(
+Dougherty 1995
+;
+Gil-Santana 2019
+;
+Maldonado 1990
+). As with other
+Ectrichodiini
+species from the Neotropics,
+Dougherty (1995)
+did not indicate specific localities from
+Colombia
+for
+
+R. conspersa
+
+, which are provided here.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 7
+. Habitus images of
+
+Rhiginia
+species. A
+
+, B.
+
+R. conspersa
+
+; A. male; B. female; C.
+
+R. immarginata
+
+, male.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+Gil-Santana (2019)
+presented a dorsal habitus image of the
+holotype
+from
+Ecuador
+. He also documented a specimen from
+Panama
+and noted the variation in the coloration of the connexiva, being a continuous, slightly sinuous, yellow line in the
+holotype
+from
+Ecuador
+, and clearly banded with an almost semicircular yellow spot on each connexival segment in the specimen from
+Panama
+. The examined Colombian specimens have a banded connexival coloration pattern as the Panamanian specimen (
+Figs. 7A, B
+), in which each connexival segment has the posterior half completely dark, thus interrupting the yellow band. Most observations on iNaturalist of
+
+R. conspersa
+
+from
+Ecuador
+(https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?place_id=7512&taxon_id=900438) have a nearly continuous yellow line on the margin of the connexiva, thus matching the coloration pattern of the
+holotype
+. A single observation from
+Ecuador
+(
+Manabí
+, reserva Jama-Coaque) exhibit a more undulated continuous yellow line (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/35462859), thus being almost intermediate between the coloration of the
+holotype
+—and most of the remaining Ecuadorian specimens—and those from
+Panama
+and
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+.
+Antioquia
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Río Claro
+,
+San Luis
+,
+
+440 m
+
+,
+
+6.ix.1994
+
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, same data, no date, EFA (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, same data, 9.v.94,
+Diana Marquez
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+
+Atlántico
+
+:
+1 ♀
+, reserva campesina la
+Montaña
+,
+10.7673889°N
+75.0127778°W
+,
+
+214 m
+
+,
+
+v.2013
+
+, M. C.
+Román
+[colecta manual] (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+
+Boyacá
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Puerto Boyacá
+,
+Puerto Romero
+, vereda
+la Fiebre
+, quebrada la
+Fiebre
+,
+pitfall trap
+,
+
+400 m
+
+,
+
+11.iii.2000
+
+,
+M. Rocha
+y estudiantes (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Caldas
+
+:
+2 ♀♀
+,
+Dorada
+,
+Guarinocito
+,
+
+980 m
+
+,
+
+15–17.ix.1989
+
+,
+Sanguine
+,
+Arce
+,
+Arango
+,
+Orozco
+,
+Higuera
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+La Dorada
+,
+05°27ˊ24˝N
+74°40ˊ02˝W
+,
+
+178 m
+
+,
+
+14.iv.2001
+
+, grasses, E.
+Ruiz
+, K.
+Caballero
+,
+J. Cardena
+(
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Chocó
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Acandí
+,
+Capurganá
+, [
+8.635046°N
+77.347716°W
+], en vega de río [= river plain],
+
+31.iii.2009
+
+, A.
+Bernal
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Acandí
+,
+Capurganá
+,
+Jardín Botánico del Darién
+, [
+8.639755°N
+77.350424°W
+],
+
+60 m
+
+, rastrojo [= scrub vegetation],
+
+9.iv.2008
+
+, manual collecting, M.
+Camargo
+J.
+Izquierdo
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT); 1 nymph, same data,
+
+40 m
+
+,
+
+11.x.2007
+
+, manual, forest,
+Angulo Rios
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Acandí
+, v[ere]da los
+Rios
+, bosque [Capurganá, Bosque camino a los Ríos],
+
+270 m
+
+,
+
+26.iv.2007
+
+, manual collecting,
+O. Amaya
+et al.
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT);
+Unión Panamericana Salero
+,
+05°32ˊ45˝N
+76°44ˊ33.3˝W
+,
+
+115 m
+
+, in forest,
+
+16.vi.2001
+
+,
+J. C. Neita
+(
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Riosucio
+,
+Sautatá, H
+.
+Echeverri
+/ PK(I-01084),
+
+12.vi.1978
+
+/ ICN029271 (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+1♂
+, same data,
+Cacarica
+/ PK(I-01509),
+
+2.viii.1978
+
+/ ICN029272 (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, same data,
+Cacarica
+/ PK(I-01510),
+
+2.viii.1978
+
+/ ICN029273 (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, same data,
+Tilupo
+/ PK 00580,
+
+9.iv.1978
+
+/ ICN029274 (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Nariño
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Solahonda
+, manual collecting at night,
+
+15.ix.2015
+
+, estudiantes taxonomia animal (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Tolima
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Mariquita, J. H
+.
+Jimenez
+,
+
+29.viii.1987
+
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1♂
+,
+Purificación
+,
+El Baura
+, finca
+Rivadavia
+,
+03°51ˊ45˝N
+74°55ˊ49˝W
+,
+
+329 m
+
+,
+
+14.iv.2001
+
+, M.
+Amado
+,
+G. Padilla
+(
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Valle del Cauca
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Buenaventura
+,
+Bajo Calima
+CF UT [= centro forestal de la Universidad del Tolima,
+3.9534°N
+76.9902°W
+,
+
+50 m
+
+],
+M. Pinzon
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Bajo Calima
+,
+03°55ˊ30˝N
+76°29ˊ40˝W
+,
+
+1485 m
+
+,
+
+12.x.1988
+
+, M.
+Arcila
+(
+UNAB
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8814C471FF3EF8A532120AFE.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8814C471FF3EF8A532120AFE.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8b220f8299a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8814C471FF3EF8A532120AFE.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Cidoria flava
+Amyot & Serville, 1843
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs. 8A, B
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+:
+
+Cidoria flava
+
+is known from
+French Guiana
+(
+Maldonado 1990
+) and
+Peru
+(
+Zhang & Weirauch 2014
+), and it represents a new generic and species record from
+Colombia
+. All known specimens are restricted to the Amazon basin.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 8
+. Habitus images of
+Harpactorini
+species.A, B.
+
+Cidoria flava
+
+; A. dorsal view; B. lateral view; C, D.
+
+Corcia nigricornis
+
+; C. dorsal view; D. lateral view.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+
+Cidoria flava
+
+is probably a nocturnal
+Harpactorini
+species because it has been collected at lights (
+Bérenger 2007
+).
+
+Mejía-Soto
+et al.
+(2022)
+
+suggested that
+
+C. flava
+
+might be a
+
+Ploeogaster
+species.
+
+Zhang & Weirauch (2014)
+included a specimen identified as
+
+Ploeogaster
+sp.
+
+(UCR_ENT 00001516, RCW_636), which given its pronotal structure, fits what has been described as
+
+Cidoria
+(
+
+Mejia-Soto
+et al.
+2022
+
+)
+
+. This specimen was nested within the
+
+Ploeogaster
+
+clade in the analysis of
+Zhang & Weirauch (2014)
+. Future studies might corroborate this, leading to the synonymy of
+
+Cidoria
+
+and
+
+Ploeogaster
+
+.
+
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+.
+Vaupés
+:
+
+1 ♂
+, comunidad Villa Fatima,
+
+iv.2002
+
+,
+W. Yara
+(
+CTNI
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8814C473FF3EFB1935250DFA.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8814C473FF3EFB1935250DFA.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..591f264705b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8814C473FF3EFB1935250DFA.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Rhiginia immarginata
+Stål, 1866
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 7C
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: This species was previously known from
+Ecuador
+(
+Forthman & Gil-Santana 2021
+;
+Maldonado 1990
+;
+Stål 1872
+),
+Peru
+, and
+Brazil
+(
+Dougherty 1995
+).
+Dougherty (1995)
+just listed
+Brazil
+and
+Peru
+as countries for this species, but so far, no precise localities are known for these two. This species is a new country record from
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks
+: Based on the examined Colombian specimen, and the Ecuadorian records (both from
+Forthman & Gil-Santana 2021
+, and iNaturalist https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?place_id=7512&subview=map&taxon_ id=900445),
+
+R. immarginata
+
+seems to be restricted to the Amazon basin. Thus, it is likely that precise localities in
+Brazil
+and
+Peru
+could be found also in the Amazon.
+
+
+
+Examined
+material
+
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+
+.
+
+Amazonas
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Leticia
+,
+Monilla Amena
+[Comunidad indígena Monifue Amena, Km 9.8 vía Leticia-Tarapacá,
+04.141667°S
+69.92325°W
+],
+light trap
+, chagra [= agricultural field],
+
+13.x.2002
+
+,
+
+60 m
+
+, Cotes
+et al.
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8816C470FF3EFB7436E60AFE.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8816C470FF3EFB7436E60AFE.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..00577ed8ab8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8816C470FF3EFB7436E60AFE.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,409 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Pirnonota convexicollis
+Stål, 1859
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 9A
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: This species was described from
+Brazil
+with subsequent records from
+Panama
+(
+Champion 1899
+;
+Maldonado 1990
+;
+Stål 1859
+) and
+Colombia
+(
+Forero 2006
+). It represents a new species record from
+Honduras
+,
+Costa Rica
+,
+Bolivia
+, and
+Peru
+. The examined material notably extends the previously known distribution for this species, both in Central and South America.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+Champion (1899)
+documented the color variation of this species on the pronotum and hemelytra. This polychromatism is apparently not sexually related, as males and females both vary their color, and it is similar to what happens in many other
+Harpactorini
+species. The biological significance of this color polymorphism is unknown. Polychromatism is also present in other predatory Heteroptera such as Asopinae (
+Pentatomidae
+) (
+
+Brugnera
+et al.
+2019
+
+), which in some cases might be aposematic due to their prey being toxic (
+Doesburg 1970
+;
+Paleari 2013
+). Unraveling the natural history of
+
+P. convexicollis
+
+, in particular on its prey preferences, might shed light on this phenomenon.
+
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+HONDURAS
+
+.
+1 adult
+, sex unknown (abdomen shriveled),
+La Ceiba
+,
+
+17.ix.1916
+
+/
+F. J. Dyer
+col. /
+
+Pirnonota convexicollis
+Stål Barber
+
+det. (
+USNM
+)
+
+.
+
+
+COSTA RICA
+
+.
+1 ♀
+,
+Turrialba
+,
+
+15.vii.1965
+
+,
+P. J. Spangler
+/
+
+Pirnonota convexicollis
+St Mald. (USNM)
+
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Cartago
+,
+Grano de Oro
+,
+Chirripo
+,
+Turrialba
+,
+9.81836°N
+83.45916°W
+,
+
+1120 m
+
+,
+
+19.vi.1993
+
+,
+P. Campos
+/ UCR_ENT00014364 (
+MNCR
+ex
+INBIO
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Limon
+,
+Pococi
+,
+Colorado
+,
+Sector Cerro Cocori
+,
+
+30 km
+N Cariari
+
+,
+10.59281°N
+83.71456°W
+,
+
+100 m
+
+,
+
+1.xi.1994
+
+,
+F. Rojas
+/ UCR_ ENT00014365 (
+MNCR
+ex
+INBIO
+)
+
+.
+
+
+PANAMA
+
+.
+1 adult
+, sex unknown (abdomen shriveled),
+H Rio Indio
+,
+Pittier
+(
+USNM
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+El Cermeno
+,
+
+i–iv.1941
+
+Ztek
+4775 /
+fruit fly trap
+/ lot N. 41-7233 /
+
+Pirnonota convexicollis
+
+det.
+Elkins
+(
+USNM
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Cristobal Canal Zone
+,
+
+5.vi.1918
+
+,
+M. F. Dietx
+coll. /
+
+Pirnonota convexicollis
+
+det.
+Elkins
+(
+USNM
+)
+
+.
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+
+.
+
+Valle del Cauca
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Rio Jamundí
+,
+10 mi.
+S. Cali
+,
+
+3000 feet
+
+,
+
+19.vii.1970
+
+,
+H. & A. Howden
+/ UCR_ ENT20588 [dissected] (
+CNC
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Risaralda
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Pueblo Rico
+,
+Montezuma Ecolodge
+,
+5.9 km
+WbN of
+Pueblo Rico
+05.23016°N
+76.08364°W
+,
+
+1336 m
+
+, golpeteo de vegetación [= foliage beating],
+
+2–7.ix.2018
+
+,
+D. Forero
+/ MPUJ_ ENT0067388 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+.
+
+
+BOLIVIA
+
+.
+1 ♀
+,
+Yungas
+,
+Yana
+[ca]chi,
+M. Cardenas
+/
+
+Pirnonota convexicollis
+
+det.
+Elkins
+(
+USNM
+)
+
+.
+
+
+PERU
+.
+Madre de Dios
+
+:
+1 ♂
+(?) (abdomen shriveled),
+Rio Tambopata Res
+[erve],
+30 km
+(air)
+SW Pto. Maldonado
+,
+
+290 m
+
+12°50ˊS 69°17ˊW /
+Smithsonian Institution Canopy
+fogging project
+T.L. Erwin
+et al colls.
+
+14.ix.1984
+
+01-03 (
+USNM
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8816C471FF3EFE6034320F0A.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8816C471FF3EFE6034320F0A.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0f85b64e237
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8816C471FF3EFE6034320F0A.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Corcia nigricornis
+Champion, 1899
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs. 8C, D
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: This species was only known from Volcán
+Chiriquí
+, in
+Panama
+(
+Champion 1899
+;
+Maldonado 1990
+). The specimens examined here represent a new species record from
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+Champion (1899)
+described two new species of
+
+Corcia
+Stål, 1859
+
+,
+
+C. costaricensis
+Champion, 1899
+
+, and a very similar species,
+
+C. nigricornis
+Champion, 1899
+
+from
+Costa Rica
+. Both species have different color patterns but similar thoracic and head morphology. He indicated that
+
+C. costaricensis
+
+could be a variety of
+
+C. nigricornis
+
+, being
+
+C. nigricornis
+
+described from a female and
+
+C. costaricensis
+
+from a male. Given that all known specimens of
+
+C. nigricornis
+
+are females, including those examined here, it is indeed possible that these two names correspond to a single, dimorphic species. Sexual dimorphism is also present in
+
+C. columbica
+Stål, 1859
+
+, in which females are yellow with dark bands, whereas males are yellow with a black head. The hypothesis that these two names correspond to a single species should await for additional specimens and natural history observations to be corroborated.
+
+
+
+Examined
+material
+
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+.
+Ant
+[ioquia]
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Sonsón
+,
+Reserva Cañon del Río Claro
+5°53ˊ5.13˝N
+;
+74°51ˊ11.13˝W
+,
+
+350–400 m
+
+, primary forest, manual collecting,
+
+31.viii.2015
+
+,
+A. Mejía
+, CEUA 98982 (
+CEUA
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Rionegro
+, corr[egimiento]
+San Antonio de Pereira
+,
+Parque
+las
+Veraneras
+,
+6°07ˊ48.98˝N
+75°22ˊ48˝W
+,
+
+2126 m
+
+, forest,
+insect net
+,
+
+10.viii.2011
+
+C. Pérez
+, CEUA 99235 (
+CEUA
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Córdoba
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Tierralta
+,
+Vda. La Oscurana
+, humid forest,
+insect net
+,
+
+16.xi.2006
+
+,
+H. G. Pertuz
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8817C46EFF3EF98C3509084E.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8817C46EFF3EF98C3509084E.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d4ab1d90f79
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8817C46EFF3EF98C3509084E.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Repipta lepidula
+Stål, 1866
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs. 9C, D
+;
+11A–G
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: This species has been recorded from
+Brazil
+(Amazonas) and
+Peru
+(
+Huánuco
+) (
+
+Martin-Park
+et al.
+2012
+
+). It is a new species record from
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+
+Repipta lepidula
+
+is a very distinctive species due to the overall brown coloration, with the paramedial posterior margin of the pronotum and the scutellum yellow (
+Fig. 9C
+). The previously known Brazilian and Peruvian localities are close to the Colombian one, and all known localities are restricted to the Amazon basin. Some of the Colombian specimens were collected in Várzea Forest, which is a seasonal floodplain forest.
+
+
+
+Repipta
+Stål, 1859
+
+is an ill-defined genus with dubious phylogenetic relationships. It includes 29 species ranging from the
+USA
+to
+Argentina
+(
+
+Martin-Park
+et al.
+2012
+
+). Although
+
+Martin-Park
+et al.
+(2012)
+
+revised
+
+Repipta
+
+, at least four species (cf.
+Maldonado 1990
+) were omitted from their treatment without explanation, including
+
+R. sanguinea
+
+(see below), thus making it very difficult to use their key or treatment for species identification. Given that the documentation of the genitalia of the species of
+
+Repipta
+
+seems to be critical to identify
+
+Repipta
+species
+
+, and that
+
+Martin-Park
+et al.
+(2012)
+
+images of the male and female genitalia were either extremely poorly detailed or not documented at all, we are providing high quality images here. This is the first time the male genitalia of
+
+R. lepidula
+
+are documented (
+Fig. 11
+). The median process of the pygophore is short, broadly rounded, and shortly setose (
+Figs. 11A–C
+). The paramere is cylindrical, relatively long, about half as long as the pygophore length, with a few scattered setae, denser and longer near the apex (
+Fig. 11A
+). The aedeagus has the endosoma with a pair of very short median basal sclerotizations (
+Fig. 11E
+); the median dorsal lobe has a pair of U-shaped areas beset with small triangular microtrichia, and an apical round field of similar microtrichia. The dorsal phallothecal plate is flat, ovoid and broadly rounded apically (
+Fig. 11G
+).
+
+
+
+FIGURE 9
+. Habitus images of
+Harpactorini
+species. A.
+
+Pirnonota convexicollis
+
+, male dorsal view; B.
+
+Pselliopus punctipes
+
+, male dorsal view; C, D.
+
+Repipta lepidula
+
+; C. male dorsal view; D. lateral view.
+
+
+
+
+Examined
+material:
+
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+
+.
+
+Amazonas
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Leticia
+, comunidad
+Monilla
+[Comunidad indígena Monifue Amena, Km 9,8 vía Leticia-Tarapacá,
+04.141667°S
+69.923256°W
+,
+
+70 m
+
+],
+Várzea Forest
+,
+
+60 m
+
+,
+
+30.iv.2002
+
+, manual collecting at night,
+Cadena
+,
+Gualdron
+,
+Pans
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+2 ♂♂
+,
+2 ♀♀
+, PNN
+Amacayacu
+,
+Vía Palmeras
+, edge of
+Varzea Forest
+, jameo [=
+entomological net
+],
+D. Campos
+&
+F. Fernández
+,
+
+1.ix.1997
+
+/ IAvH-E-87164, IAvH-E-87209, IAvH-E-87224, IAvH-E-87254 (
+IAVH
+)
+
+;
+
+2 ♂♂
+, PNN
+Amacayacu
+,
+Vía Palmeras
+, borde, jameo [=
+entomological net
+],
+D. Campos
+&
+F. Fernández
+,
+
+2.ix.1997
+
+/ IAvH-E-87194, IAvH-E-87239 (
+IAVH
+)
+
+;
+
+1 adult
+(sex unknown), PNN
+Amacayacu
+,
+Matamata
+, 3°23ˊS 70°6ˊW,
+
+150 m
+
+,
+entomological net
+,
+D. Chota
+,
+
+2.i.2000
+
+/ IAvH-E- 87887 (
+IAVH
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, PNN
+Amacayacu
+,
+Matamata
+, 3°23ˊS 70°6ˊW,
+
+150 m
+
+,
+entomological net
+, M.1887,
+A. Parente
+,
+
+28.v.2001
+
+/ IAvH-E-87848 (
+IAVH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8817C470FF3EFE6133490E92.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8817C470FF3EFE6133490E92.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f2e7e4f8cd2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA8817C470FF3EFE6133490E92.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,385 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Pselliopus punctipes
+Amyot and Serville, 1843
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 9B
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+:
+
+Pselliopus punctipes
+Amyot & Serville, 1843
+
+has been recorded from
+Mexico
+,
+Guatemala
+,
+Nicaragua
+,
+El Salvador
+,
+Panama
+, French Guiana, and
+Suriname
+(
+
+Brailovsky
+et al.
+2007
+
+;
+Champion 1899
+;
+Maldonado 1990
+;
+Stål 1862
+). This species represents a new generic and species record from
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+
+Pselliopus punctipes
+
+is easy to recognize because of the irregular dark bands on the legs, the spined humeral angles, the shortly tuberculate posterior pronotal lobe, and the few long spines on the anterior pronotal lobe (
+Champion 1899
+). Finding this species in
+Colombia
+fills the gap between
+Panama
+and other areas in northern South America.
+
+There is some variation in the color pattern of this species. The head ranges from dorsally being nearly entirely black to just having a few longitudinal spots on its posterior lobe and adjacent to the ocelli. Similarly, the extension of the dark area adjacent to the base of the spine at the humeral angles of the pronotum is variable. It ranges from nearly covering the entire posterior half of the posterior lobe to being restricted to the base of the humeral spines. The dark area does not extend into the posterior recurved flange of the posterior margin of the pronotum. The disc of the posterior lobe has a few medium-sized setae whose bases are always black.
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+
+.
+
+Chocó
+:
+
+1♂
+,
+Rio Sucio
+,
+
+La Balsa
+
+,
+7°2ˊ26˝N
+,
+77°20ˊ16˝W
+,
+
+50–80 m
+
+,
+F. Fernandez
+/ ICN037902 (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Casanare
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Tauramena
+,
+Kiosco Verde
+, ~
+
+2.5 km
+SW de Tauramena
+
+,
+
+526 m
+
+,
+5.00385°N
+72.77376°W
+,
+
+25–29.viii.2014
+
+,
+D. Forero
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Trinidad
+, reserva natural
+La Palmita
+,
+05.4202°N
+71.5997°W
+,
+
+182 m
+
+,
+
+18–23.viii.2019
+
+, J.
+Ariza
+,
+R. García
+/ flooded gallery forest / MPUJ_ENT0069978 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+
+Córdoba
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Los Córdobas
+,
+la Salada
+, platanal [= banana plantation], manual collecting,
+
+vi.2005
+
+,
+C. Fernández
+/ MPUJ_ENT0011097 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Pto. Libertador
+CCSA, rastrojo [= scrub vegetation],
+insect net
+,
+
+30.i.2006
+
+,
+H. G. Pertúz
+/ MPUJ_ENT0011096 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+.
+
+
+Cundinamarca
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Guayabetal
+,
+4.22777°N
+73.81638°W
+,
+
+1200 m
+
+,
+
+1.vi.1969
+
+, A.
+Uribe
+/ UCR_ENT00045995 (
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+1 adult
+sex not determined (abdomen missing),
+La Mesa
+,
+
+2.ix.1991
+
+, B. B. / ICN028123 (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+La Vega
+,
+4.99083°N
+74.33972°W
+,
+
+1230 m
+
+,
+
+14.ix.1996
+
+, C.
+Salas
+/ UCR_ENT 00045993 (
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Santander
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Suaita
+,
+Hacienda Santa Barbara
+,
+6.10000°N
+73.43333°W
+,
+
+1550 m
+
+,
+Y. Sossa
+&
+R. Garzon
+/ UCR_ENT 00045994 (
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Tolima
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+El Guamo
+,
+
+20.vi.1976
+
+,
+A. Bernal
+/ ICN028122 (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Valle del Cauca
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Buenaventura
+,
+Bajo Calima
+, centro forestal UT [universidad del Tolima],
+
+70m
+
+,
+entomological net
+,
+
+21.iii.1995
+
+/ MPUJ_ENT0011102 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881CC47BFF3EFF2C369E08BD.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881CC47BFF3EFF2C369E08BD.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3599cd69040
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881CC47BFF3EFF2C369E08BD.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Brontostoma colossus
+(
+Distant, 1902
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs. 1E, F
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: This species was originally described from
+Paraguay
+(
+Distant 1902
+), and additionally recorded from
+Argentina
+,
+Bolivia
+, and
+Brazil
+(
+Dougherty 1995
+;
+Maldonado 1990
+;
+Wygodzinsky 1951
+). It is a new record from
+Colombia
+and
+Ecuador
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks
+:
+Wygodzinsky (1951)
+indicated the highly variable color pattern of this species, not only across its known distributional range, but also within a single locality. Nonetheless, the yellowish longitudinal markings on the corium, usually with transverse ones connecting the longitudinal ones, is indicative of this species. One aspect of the examined specimen not agreeing with the short notes of
+Wygodzinsky (1951)
+is that the all the specimens examined by him—mostly from
+Argentina
+—had a uniformly darkened forewing membrane. In the examined specimen here (
+Fig. 1E
+), as well as
+one specimen
+from
+Ecuador
+(from iNaturalist, see below), the membrane is variegated with pale brown markings. Other specimens of
+
+B. colossus
+
+from the northern portion of its distribution (e.g.,
+French Guiana
+: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/178448936;
+Brazil
+, [Amazonas]: https://www.inaturalist.org/ observations/178448936, [Pará]: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/143728928, [
+Mato Grosso
+]: https://www. inaturalist.org/observations/143569846), have the membrane with a few pale brown small and localized areas, in contrast to the strongly variegated brown areas of the specimens from
+Colombia
+and
+Ecuador
+. We interpret this as intraspecific variation of the northern populations of
+
+B. colossus
+
+. Clearly, better collecting efforts in these areas, and study of the male genitalia, will help elucidate the variation and limits of this species.
+
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+.
+Guaviare
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+San Jose del Guaviare
+, playa
+Güio
+[
+02.5722°N
+72.7090°W
+,
+
+180 m
+
+],
+
+x.2013
+
+,
+E. Flórez
+y estudiantes
+de Taxonomia Animal
+, ICN103360 (
+ICN
+)
+
+.
+
+
+ECUADOR
+.
+Napo
+
+: adult, sex unknown,
+Wild Sumaco Lodge
+,
+0.675693°N
+77.601286°W
+,
+Emily Hjalmarson
+, https://www.inaturalist.org/ observations/149450579
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881DC47AFF3EF9F0339D0C86.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881DC47AFF3EF9F0339D0C86.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8106ba882f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881DC47AFF3EF9F0339D0C86.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Pseudopothea paulai
+Gil-Santana, 2015
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 3D
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: Described originally from the states of
+Ceará
+(Carquejo) and Amazonas (Benjamin Constant) in
+Brazil
+(Gil-Santana 2015), and recently recorded from
+Ecuador
+(
+Gil-Santana & Husemann 2023
+). It represents a new generic and species record from
+Bolivia
+and
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks
+: The examined specimens agree perfectly with the description and photos of Gil-Santana (2015) for this species. Based on the known distribution, this species seems to be found from the Amazon basin in the north to the Yungas in
+Bolivia
+in the south. All specimens examined here were collected in Malaise traps.
+
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+BOLIVIA
+
+.
+
+Santa Cruz
+
+:
+1 ♂
+, refugio los
+Volcanes
+18 06ˊS 63 36ˊW,
+
+1000 m
+
+,
+
+25- 30.x.2007
+
+,
+F Romero
+,
+Malaise
+(
+UCR
+)
+
+.
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+
+.
+
+Vaupés
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Estación
+biológica
+Mosiro-Itajura
+(Caparú), 1°4ˊS 69°31ˊW,
+
+60 m
+
+,
+Malaise
+#M, 4392,
+
+05-15.iii.2004
+
+,
+J. Pinzon
+/ IAvH-E 175341 (
+IAVH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881DC47AFF3EFCAC35650D76.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881DC47AFF3EFCAC35650D76.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..66b7a6573d7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881DC47AFF3EFCAC35650D76.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Pothea ventralis
+(Lepeletier & Serville, 1825)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs. 3B, C
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: Described from French Guiana (Cayenne), and recorded subsequently from
+Guyana
+,
+Brazil
+,
+Bolivia
+,
+Peru
+,
+Paraguay
+, and
+Argentina
+(
+Dougherty 1995
+;
+Maldonado 1990
+). It is a new record from
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks
+:
+Amyot & Serville (1843)
+proposed the genus
+
+Pothea
+
+to include two species,
+
+P. frontalis
+(Lepeletier & Serville, 1825)
+
+and
+
+P. ventralis
+
+.
+Wygodzinsky (1949a)
+subsequently designated
+
+P. ventralis
+
+as the
+type
+species of
+
+Pothea
+
+. Despite being the
+type
+species of the genus, surprisingly very little has been documented for this species; for instance,
+Forthman & Weirauch (2016)
+illustrated the limited sexual dimorphism of this species, but not much else has been documented.
+
+Pothea ventralis
+
+is very similar to
+
+P. haglundii
+
+Stål,
+1872
+
+
+in their body coloration, particularly the black thoracic sternites and pleurites, but can be differentiated by the relatively small ocelli of
+
+P. ventralis
+(
+Dougherty 1980
+)
+
+. The examined females (
+Fig. 2B
+) agree with
+Dougherty (1995)
+in its head structure.
+Carpintero (1978)
+showed that the median process of the pygophore of the male genitalia was different among very similar species of
+
+Pothea
+
+. Further studies should document the male genitalia of
+
+P. ventralis
+
+to help in its delimitation.
+
+
+The record of
+Fracker and Bruner (1924)
+of
+
+P. ventralis
+
+from
+Peru
+is probably a misidentification. They described the connexivum as having the first five segments black and the rest red, thus, probably corresponding to some other species of
+
+Pothea
+
+.
+
+
+
+Examined
+material
+
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+. Cund[inamarca]:
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Tame
+,
+Olga V. Castaño
+,
+
+5.viii.1970
+
+, ICN029270 (
+ICN
+);
+
+Meta
+:
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Acacias
+, vereda
+la Esmeralda
+, centro agroturistico
+Araguaney
+,
+
+17.iv.2004
+
+,
+E. Florez
+y estudiantes sistematica animal, ICN037890 (
+ICN
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881DC47AFF3EFF2C35CA09B9.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881DC47AFF3EFF2C35CA09B9.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7406f26759c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881DC47AFF3EFF2C35CA09B9.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Pothea jaguaris
+(
+Carpintero, 1980
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Fig. 3A
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: Originally described from
+Bolivia
+(
+Carpintero 1980
+), with additional records from
+Brazil
+and
+French Guiana
+(
+Gil-Santana 2007
+,
+2014
+). It is a new species record from
+Colombia
+.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks
+:
+Carpintero (1980)
+described
+
+Parapothea
+
+to accommodate
+
+P. jaguaris
+
+, but
+
+Parapothea
+
+is now regarded a synonym of
+
+Pothea
+Amyot & Serville, 1843
+
+(
+Dougherty 1995
+;
+Gil-Santana 2014
+).
+Gil-Santana (2014)
+redescribed
+
+P. jaguaris
+
+, documenting the color pattern and morphological variability of this species across its distributional range. The examined specimen (
+Fig. 2A
+), as well as the images from iNaturalist, fall within the color variability range of
+
+P. jaguaris
+
+, and thus, the species is recorded for the first time from
+Colombia
+.
+Forero (2006)
+recorded
+two specimens
+similar to
+
+P. jaguaris
+
+(as
+
+Parapothea
+
+). A reexamination of those specimens showed that they are not conspecific with
+
+P. jaguaris
+
+but they represent an undescribed species.
+
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+.
+Antioquia
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Gomes Plata
+, vereda
+Vega Botero
+,
+
+900 m
+
+,
+
+21.i.2012
+
+,
+insect net
+, forest,
+E. Rios
+,
+M. García
+(
+MEFLG
+)
+
+.
+
+
+Cundinamarca
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Nocaima
+,
+05.0694°N
+74.3803°W
+,
+Oscar Enciso
+, https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/146251539
+
+;
+1 ♀
+, La Vega,
+04.9989°N
+74.3596°W
+, David Steve, https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/187826859.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881FC475FF3EFF2C339A09F2.xml b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881FC475FF3EFF2C339A09F2.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c874451026b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/7F/78/87/7F7887DA881FC475FF3EFF2C339A09F2.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,900 @@
+
+
+
+Filling in the gaps for assassin bugs: taxonomic notes and new records of Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Neotropical countries
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Forero, Dimitri
+Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mejía-Soto, Andrés
+Museo de Zoología ‘ Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico & Grupo de Entomología Universidad de Antioquia (GEUA), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+451
+481
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.1
+1175-5326
+E0232160-9292-4F9A-A87B-BC073E8B9A50
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Rhiginia bimaculata
+Breddin, 1914
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs. 4–6
+
+
+
+
+Distribution
+: This species is known from
+Guatemala
+,
+Honduras
+,
+Costa Rica
+,
+Panama
+,
+Colombia
+,
+Venezuela
+, and
+Ecuador
+(
+Dougherty 1995
+;
+Maldonado 1990
+). It is the first time that precise localities from
+Colombia
+are provided.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks:
+
+Rhiginia bimaculata
+
+is a widespread species in Central and South America (
+Dougherty 1995
+;
+Forthman & Gil-Santana 2021
+;
+Maldonado 1990
+) and seems to be commonly found in
+Colombia
+from sea level up to 1430 meters.
+Dougherty (1995)
+simply mentioned countries of occurrence but did not list specific localities for the species listed. We are providing accurate locality data for
+
+R. bimaculata
+
+.
+Forthman & Gil-Santana (2021)
+mentioned that species of the
+cruciata
+-group, to which
+
+R. bimaculata
+
+is assigned, are uniform in genitalic structure, and thus not useful for species delimitation. Given that species in this group have been delimited mostly using coloration patterns, they called for a more thorough documentation of structural attributes, in particular head and pronotum. In the case of
+
+R. bimaculata
+
+, given the limited number of specimens examined by them,
+one male
+and
+one female
+, color variation and structural details of additional specimens of both sexes are provided here.
+
+
+The documented structures and coloration reinforce the ideas of
+Forthman & Gil-Santana (2021)
+about the species limits of
+
+R. bimaculata
+
+. After having examined a large series of
+
+R. bimaculata
+
+, the color variation is minimal (
+Fig. 4
+). The areas varying are the posterior margin of the pronotum, which can vary from black to reddish, and the submedial areas on the transverse sulcus, which can vary from reddish to having a pair of black subtriangular markings (
+Fig. 4A, C
+).
+
+Rhiginia bimaculata
+
+can be differentiated from
+
+R. nicholsae
+Forthman & Gil-Santana, 2021
+
+because the abdominal sternites are entirely black (
+Fig. 4B, D
+), whereas in
+
+R. nicholsae
+
+each sternite has a yellowish or reddish marking on its lateral area next to the connexivum, and a pale, irregular area medially (see figures in
+Forthman & Gil-Santana 2021
+). In addition, the connexivum is yellow, narrower, and restricted to the non-rugose areas of each dorsal laterotergite in
+
+R. bimaculata
+
+(
+Fig. 6C
+), whereas it is reddish, wider, and extending medially into the rugose areas of the laterotergites in
+
+R. nicholsae
+
+. The yellow band on the connexivum is usually wide in
+
+R. bimaculata
+
+(
+Figs. 4C
+,
+6C
+), but there are a few specimens (females) in which the yellow band on the dorsal portion of the connexivum is much narrower. Nonetheless, the pattern of having a dorsal and ventral yellow margin on the connexivum seems to be constant. The structure of the head, with a slightly convex frons, the ocelli separated by the diameter of about one ocellus (
+Figs. 5A, B
+), and in lateral view occupying about two thirds of the ocellar tubercle (
+Figs. 5C, D
+), as well as the structure of the pronotum (
+Figs. 5E, F
+), are constant in the examined material and fit the description of
+Forthman & Gil-Santana (2021)
+. The total length of a few specimens measured ranged between
+14.4–15.97 mm
+(
+three males
+) and
+15.95–18.06 mm
+(
+four females
+), being the males of
+
+R. bimaculata
+
+smaller than in
+
+R. nicholsae
+
+(16.8–19.5,
+Forthman & Gil-Santana 2021
+). In
+
+R. bimaculata
+
+the abdominal sternite II is rugose in both sexes (
+Figs. 6A, B
+), but not with longitudinal ridges as indicated by
+Forthman & Gil-Santana (2021)
+. All other characters that characterize
+
+R. nicholsae
+(
+Forthman & Gil-Santana 2021
+)
+
+are not present in
+
+R. bimaculata
+
+. All these suggest that both coloration pattern and morphological characters can distinguish
+
+R. bimaculata
+
+from other species of the
+cruciata
+-group.
+
+
+Examined material
+:
+
+
+COLOMBIA
+. [
+Antioquia
+]
+
+:
+2 ♂♂
+, CO05
+Apartado
+, via a
+Carepa
+, parque de los encuentros,
+
+30 m
+
+, rastrojo [= scrub vegetation], manual collecting,
+
+24–27.xi.2004
+
+,
+Velez
+y
+Grisales
+/ MEPB 7703 / MEPB 7641 [
+MEPB
+]
+
+;
+
+
+Bolívar
+
+
+:
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Zambrano
+,
+Hda. Monterrey
+,
+
+70 m
+
+,
+9°37ˊ48˝N
+74°54ˊ44˝W
+,
+F. Fernández
+&
+G. Ulloa
+/
+Malaise
+#6 lata suelo / ICN036191 (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Chocó
+
+
+:
+
+1 ♂
+, costa
+Pacifico
+,
+Richter
+,
+
+vi.1950
+
+/ ICN 029286 (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, PNN
+Utría
+, casa guardaparques,
+06°00ˊ55.9˝N
+77°21ˊ31.7˝W
+,
+
+15.viii.2017
+
+,
+
+5 m
+
+,
+L. Prada
+&
+S. Vargas
+/ MPUJ_ ENT0054355 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Acandí
+,
+Capurganá
+, vereda los
+Pinos
+, bosque,
+
+250 m
+
+,
+
+26.iv.2007
+
+, 16:00 hrs,
+C. Castro
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Acandí
+,
+Capurganá
+, jardín botánico del
+Darién
+,
+
+40m
+
+,
+
+10 oct 2007
+
+, zarandeo [= plant beating], 8–9 hr, soleado [= sunny],
+C. Latorre
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+
+Boyacá
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Otanche
+,
+05°39ˊ35˝N
+74°11ˊ20˝W
+,
+
+1050 m
+
+,
+
+7.viii.1992
+
+,
+Contreras
+,
+Neira
+(
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Cundinamarca
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Bituima
+,
+04°52ˊ31˝N
+74°32ˊ33˝W
+,
+
+1412 m
+
+,
+
+19.x.1989
+
+, C.
+Galindo
+(
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Guayabetal
+,
+04°13ˊ40˝N
+73°48ˊ59˝W
+,
+
+1200 m
+
+,
+
+17.v.1969
+
+, S.
+Martinez
+(
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+La Esperanza
+,
+El Ocaso
+,
+G. de Pinzón
+,
+
+12.x.1977
+
+/ ICN029285 (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Mesitas
+,
+Martinez
+,
+
+5.ix.1998
+
+,
+A. Bautista
+,
+A. Bohorquez
+(
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Tocaima
+,
+04°27ˊ40˝N
+74°38ˊ10˝W
+,
+
+400 m
+
+,
+
+21.ix.1994
+
+, A.
+Torres
+(
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Mag
+[dalena]
+
+
+:
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Parque Tayrona, C
+.
+Kugler
+/
+Pueblito
+—limite sur
+
+210–360 m
+
+,
+
+2.iv.1977
+
+/ IAVH- E 188407 (
+IAVH
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Santa Marta
+, vereda
+Mosquito
+, reserva estación biológica
+Jaguar del Carrizal
+,
+11.1739°N
+74.1665°W
+,
+
+250 m
+
+,
+
+iv–vi.2021
+
+, M. P.
+Camelo
+/ MPUJ_ENT0075885 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+.
+
+
+Nariño
+
+:
+1 ♂
+,
+Tumaco
+,
+
+iii.2016
+
+(
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Quindio
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Filandia
+,
+rio Barbas
+, ~
+
+1.1km
+NNW de Filandia
+
+,
+4.71346°N
+75.68237°W
+,
+
+1429 m
+
+,
+
+21–26 feb 2016
+
+, M.
+Moreno
+/ river margin, manual collecting / MPUJ_ENT0043730 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+
+Risaralda
+
+:
+1 ♀
+, mun[icipio]
+Pueblo Rico
+, corr[egimiento]
+Santa Cecilia
+, vereda
+El Silencio
+, quebrada
+Piedras
+,
+
+640 m
+
+,
+
+15.iv.1991
+
+,
+G. Andrade
+#2390 / ICN029283 (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Santander
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Barbosa
+,
+05°55ˊ58˝N
+73°37ˊ16˝W
+,
+
+1588 m
+
+,
+
+14.x.1998
+
+, L.
+Gallego
+, J.
+Avila
+(
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, municipio
+de Puerto Araujo
+, vereda
+Las Marias
+, finca los
+Manantiales
+,
+
+130 m
+
+,
+
+9.iv.2000
+
+,
+pitfall trap
+, 9:00–10:00, soleado [= sunny], col.
+Felipe Velez
+et al.
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+Lebrija
+,
+Villa Lola
+,
+7.112886°N
+73.181056°W
+,
+
+1000 m
+
+,
+
+13–20.iv.2014
+
+,
+M. Velasco
+,
+pitfall trap
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+
+Tolima
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Centro Cafam Melgar
+,
+
+450 m
+
+,
+Barriga
+&
+Bello
+,
+
+4.iii.1991
+
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Coello
+,
+Reserva El Neme
+, ~
+
+1km
+SW de Coello
+
+,
+4.2801°N
+74.9035°W
+,
+
+2–6.iii.2015
+
+, M.
+Cotes
+/ MPUJ_ENT0037201 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+, same data,
+D. Torres
+/ MPUJ_ENT0037186 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+, same data,
+
+9–13 Mar 2015
+
+, M.
+Salgado
+et al.
+/ MPUJ_ ENT0032894 (
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+,
+Honda
+, río
+Magdalena
+,
+05°12ˊ25˝N
+74°44ˊ28˝W
+,
+
+225 m
+
+,
+
+iii.1997
+
+, R.
+Marin
+(
+UNAB
+)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, vereda
+la Guardra
+,
+Mariquita, G
+.
+Murillejo
+,
+
+23.ix.1978
+
+/ ICN029284 (
+ICN
+)
+
+;
+
+
+Valle del Cauca
+
+:
+1 ♀
+,
+Tuluá
+,
+Jardín Botanico
+,
+
+28.viii.1996
+
+,
+A. Vitolo
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♀
+,
+1 ♂
+, municipio de Tuluá,
+Jardín Botánico
+"Juan María Céspedes",
+
+1100 m
+
+,
+E. Amat
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+;
+
+1 ♂
+, same data,
+C. Sorzano
+(
+MPUJ
+_ENT)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/88/10/87/881087B9311AFFFFFF0FF834465BFDF8.xml b/data/88/10/87/881087B9311AFFFFFF0FF834465BFDF8.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7371eb8478c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/88/10/87/881087B9311AFFFFFF0FF834465BFDF8.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+
+
+
+Rubmacula, a new leafhopper genus from China (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Cheng, Mengsha
+Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University; The Provincial Special Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Insect Resources, Guizhou University; Guiyang, 550025 P. R. China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Lan
+Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University; The Provincial Special Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Insect Resources, Guizhou University; Guiyang, 550025 P. R. China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Xing, Jichun
+Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University; The Provincial Special Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Insect Resources, Guizhou University; Guiyang, 550025 P. R. China
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+442
+446
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.10
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.10
+1175-5326
+14853297
+84120858-3F4B-4158-B1C1-5929DAEA8C36
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Rubmacula
+
+gen. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type
+species:
+
+
+Rubmacula lvchunensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+Body yellowish-white with orange-red and brownish markings.Vertex yellowish with one red transverse arcuate band. Eyes yellowish-brown, ocelli yellowish white. Pronotum brownish-gray with one red transverse arcuate band. Face yellowish-brown, with one black-brown transverse band on anterior margin. Forewings are yellowish-brown and with red stripes. Hindwings macropterous. Legs brown.
+
+Body robust. Head including eyes wider than pronotum. Vertex with fore margin produced roundly, median length shorter than width between eyes. Eyes large. Ocelli on anterior margin. Frontoclypeus distinctly longer than wide, anteclypeus expanded apically. Clypellus flat, slightly widened apically. Lorum broad, semicircular, width equal to that of clypellus, lower margin extended close to lower genal margin. Antennae at midhight of eye. Pronotum with anterior margin roundly produced and posterior margin concave, lateral margin carinate and slightly shorter than eye. Scutellum triangular, slightly shorter than pronotum, with transverse suture depressed. Forewing with four apical cells and three subapical cells, about 4 times as long as wide, the outer anteapical cell extended to costal margin and tapered to a point apically, claval veins fused, appendix small. Hindwing with three apical cells and two anteapical cells. Profemur with 2 dorsoapical setae, row AM with 1 stout seta, row IC with 13 setae, and row AV with several short setae in basal half. Fore tibia with 3 macrosetae in row AD and numerous macrosetae in row AV. Hind femur broadened distally and slightly bowed, apical setal formula 2+2+1. Hind tibia flattened and nearly straight, row PD with 21 macrosetae decreasing in length toward base; row AD with approximately 10 long stout setae and 1–4 shorter stout setae between each long seta; metabasitarsomere with four platellae and two setae on apical transverse row.
+
+
+FIGURES 1–4.
+
+Rubmacula lvchunensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+1. ♂, dorsal view; 2. ♂, lateral view; 3.♂, face; 4. ♂, Head and thorax, dorsal view.
+
+
+
+Male genitalia
+. Pygofer side longer than height, with numerous macrosetae. Valve subtriangular. Subgenital plate with wide base, sharply narrowed posteriorly; apex long, narrow, and digitate; lateral margin with a few macrosetae. Aedeagal shaft curved, slender, aedeagus with a pair of long processes fused to base, gonopore apical. Connective Y-shaped, articulated with aedeagus. Style with basal half wider and narrowing to the middle, apical half narrow.
+
+
+Female genitalia.
+Female pygofer with ventroposterior margin slightly incurved. First valvulae with obscure reticulate sculpture dorsally and scale-like sculpture ventrally. Second valvulae with some distal teeth.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+The new genus can be distinguished from other genera of the
+Scaphoideini
+by the crown with orange-reddish band, forewings with reddish transverse bands, and aedeagus with pair of long basal processes.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+The generic name is derived from the Latin prefix “
+rub-
+” (red) with “
+macula
+”, referring to the body and forewings with reddish transverse bands.
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+Oriental Region (
+China
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/88/10/87/881087B9311EFFF9FF0FFF2F47CBFC98.xml b/data/88/10/87/881087B9311EFFF9FF0FFF2F47CBFC98.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..db5990d3519
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/88/10/87/881087B9311EFFF9FF0FFF2F47CBFC98.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+
+
+
+Rubmacula, a new leafhopper genus from China (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Cheng, Mengsha
+Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University; The Provincial Special Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Insect Resources, Guizhou University; Guiyang, 550025 P. R. China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Zhang, Lan
+Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University; The Provincial Special Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Insect Resources, Guizhou University; Guiyang, 550025 P. R. China
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Xing, Jichun
+Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University; The Provincial Special Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Insect Resources, Guizhou University; Guiyang, 550025 P. R. China
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+442
+446
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.10
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.10
+1175-5326
+14853297
+84120858-3F4B-4158-B1C1-5929DAEA8C36
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Rubmacula lvchunensis
+
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs.1–17
+
+
+Description.
+Vertex with one reddish transverse band in the mid-domain (
+Figs. 1, 4
+). Pronotum with one red transverse arcuate band (
+Fig. 4
+). Anterior margin of face with one thin black-brown transverse band (
+Fig. 3
+). Forewing with one long red stripe on clavus and two short red stripes on corium (
+Figs. 1, 2
+).
+
+External features as in generic description.
+
+Male genitalia
+: Male pygofer side length about 2 times height (
+Fig. 5
+). Subgenital plate with 12 long setae along lateral margins (
+Fig. 7
+). Aedeagus with basal processes parallel-sided in basal half, then abruptly narrowed and attenuate distally; aedeagal shaft tubular, sinuate, slender in lateral view, with pair of spines arising apically from expanded distal section; gonopore apical (
+Figs. 8–10
+). Connective with arms nearly equal to length of stem (
+Figs. 8, 9
+). Style relatively narrow and short, apical process acute, curved laterad (
+Fig. 11
+).
+
+
+Female genitalia.
+Female with seventh sternite basally transversely rectangular, its posterior margin roundly produced (
+Fig. 13
+). First valvulae of ovipositor with dorsal sculpture strigate (
+Figs. 14, 15
+). Second valvulae more curved than the first, denticulate area confined to distal 1/3, denticles prominent, gradually becoming smaller distally, apex pointed (
+Figs. 16, 17
+).
+
+
+Measurement.
+Length (including tegmen):
+♂
+,
+5.60–5.62mm
+;
+♀
+,
+5.65 mm
+.
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+Holotype
+♂
+,
+
+China
+
+:
+Yunnan
+Prov
+,
+Lvchun County
+,
+Huanglianshan
+,
+
+14 August 2014
+
+, coll.
+Zhengxiang Zhou
+(
+GUGC
+);
+paratypes
+,
+1♂
+1♀
+, same data as holotype.
+
+
+
+
+
+Etymology
+. The species name is derived from the
+type
+locality Lvchun.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/A6/40/0A/A6400A1BFF8DEF66FF6EFBB0B0EBFCFC.xml b/data/A6/40/0A/A6400A1BFF8DEF66FF6EFBB0B0EBFCFC.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2a685f80151
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/A6/40/0A/A6400A1BFF8DEF66FF6EFBB0B0EBFCFC.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,391 @@
+
+
+
+Systematic evaluation of molecular genetic, morphological and acoustic variation reveals three species in the Litoria revelata complex (Anura: Pelodryadidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Price, Luke C.
+School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 Australia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Hoskin, Conrad J.
+College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811 Australia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mahony, Michael J.
+School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, Australia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Donnellan, Stephen C.
+South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000, Australia & Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 1 William St, Sydney 2010, Australia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+301
+338
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.1
+1175-5326
+14853324
+C07BE8E9-713C-42E5-9D3F-5F6166C44C5A
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Litoria corbeni
+Wells and Wellington, 1985
+
+
+
+
+Atherton Tablelands Whirring Tree Frog
+
+
+
+Fig. 10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+: QM
+J30116
+, by original designation, adult male. Type locality: Millaa Millaa Lookout, Atherton, Tableland, north-eastern
+Queensland
+,
+Australia
+, -17.62º, 145.5678º. Collected by
+G. J. Ingram
+on
+
+1 November 1971
+
+.
+Amey & Couper (2022)
+illustrated dorsal, ventral and lateral views of the
+holotype
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis
+.
+
+Litoria corbeni
+
+can be diagnosed from
+
+L. littlejohni
+
+and
+
+L. watsoni
+
+by its smaller size (
+23–33 mm
+vs
+43–61 mm
+and
+42–64 mm
+, respectively, sexes combined). Diagnosed from
+
+L. ewingii
+
+,
+
+L. paraewingi
+
+and
+
+L. verreauxii
+
+by expanded terminal discs on fingers and toes (
+vs
+terminal discs similar width, or only slightly wider than, terminal phalanges). Diagnosed from
+
+L. jervisiensis
+
+by termination of lateral head stripe near forearm (
+vs
+terminating along flank), dark patches in groin (
+vs
+absent), and smaller size (
+23–33 mm
+vs
+37–44 mm
+, sexes combined).
+
+Litoria corbeni
+
+can be diagnosed further from the following species by its greater mean number of notes in the advertisement call (27.5, range 18–33
+vs
+2.3, range
+1–4 in
+
+L. jervisiensis
+
+; 8.8, range
+5–16 in
+
+L. littlejohni
+
+; 4, range
+3–8 in
+
+L. paraewingi
+
+; 9, range
+8–11 in
+
+L. sibilus
+
+; and 6.5, range
+3–14 in
+
+L. watsoni
+
+).
+
+
+
+Litoria corbeni
+
+can be diagnosed from
+
+L
+.
+revelata
+
+by a higher pulse repetition rate (130.2 pps ± 4.5, range 127.3–136.7
+vs
+105.3 ± 10.10, range 86.9–127.3) (
+Table 6
+). It can be diagnosed from
+
+L. eungellensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+by the absence of well-demarked, black spots or blotches along the margins of the lower hindlegs, and by a higher mean pulse repetition rate (130.2 pps ± 4.5, range 127.3–136.7
+vs
+78.1 ± 10.7, range 66.9–86.2) (
+Table 6
+).
+
+Litoria corbeni
+
+can also be diagnosed from
+
+L. revelata
+
+and
+
+L. eungellensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+by apomorphic states at 30 and 34 nucleotide sites respectively in the
+ND4
+gene alignment (
+Table 3
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Measurements of
+holotype
+(mm).
+
+SVL 30.12, HL 9.72, HW 9.57, TL 17.55, TD 1.41, ED 3.03.
+
+
+Description.
+A summary of variation in 14 mensural characters and five ratios is presented in
+Table 4
+. Mean SVL: females = 32.1 ± 0.94,
+31–33.6 mm
+; males = 27.8 ± 2.07,
+23.7–32.4 mm
+.
+
+
+
+FIGURE 10
+.
+
+Litoria corbeni
+
+in life:
+A–C
+) no vouchers, upper Walsh River, Mount Baldy, photos Conrad Hoskin;
+D–F
+) no vouchers, Millaa Millaa area, photos Mark Sanders;
+G–H
+) no vouchers, southern Atherton Tableland, photos Luke Price.
+
+
+
+Snout; rounded when viewed from above, blunt or rounded in profile. Nostrils more lateral than superior; closer to tip of snout than to eye. Canthus rostralis well-defined, and straight. Head length shorter than, to a bit longer than, head width (HL/HW 0.81–1.07), approximately one-third of SVL (HL/SVL 0.29, 0.23–0.34). Pupil horizontal when constricted (
+Fig. 10
+). Eye relatively large (ED/HL 0.4, 0.34–0.44). Tympanum distinct; circular; diameter variable (TD/ED 0.5, 0.38–0.7). Vomerine teeth in short straight rows from anterior edge of choanae to midline of palate (assessed in SAMA R72459).
+
+Fingers long, narrow; webbing absent. Subarticular and palmar tubercles prominent. Terminal discs prominent. Fingers in order of length: 3>4>2>1. Dark brown nuptial pad wraps around upper surface of base of finger I (SAMA R34328–9, R63777, RI72458–9).
+Hindlimb length moderate, but variable (TL/SVL 0.5, 0.45–0.6). Toes in order of length: 4>5=3>2>1. Webbing on toes I, II, III, V reaches base of toe disc, and on toe IV to base of the penultimate phalanx. Subarticular tubercles prominent. Rectangular inner metatarsal tubercle approximately one-quarter length of first toe. Terminal discs prominent, but smaller than finger discs.
+Dorsum finely granular. Upper surface of limbs smooth or finely granular. Flanks with dense coverage of low tubercles. Chin, abdomen, undersurface of limbs, and lateral aspect of body coarsely granular or granularity confined to lateral margins of abdomen.
+
+Colour in life.
+Dorsum tan, grey-brown, cream-brown or reddish-brown, continuing onto flanks; in most individuals, middle of dorsum has distinct darker shading that starts with well demarked margin between eyes. Some individuals with small to minute dark flecks over dorsal surfaces and flanks. A dark or light brown stripe, with a lower margin that is often poorly defined, extends from nostril along canthus rostralis through eye to just past forearm, and sometimes incorporates tympanum. Ventral surfaces white to cream, with small dark spots either peripherally or over entire ventral surface (
+Fig. 10C
+). Upper iris bright copper-gold, lower iris brown copper-gold Vocal sac pigmented light yellowish cream (
+Fig. 10C
+).
+
+
+Axilla in two of six vouchers examined (33%) with dark marks, remainder with axillae same colour as flanks or covered by diffuse extension of eye stripe. Groin with dark patch (
+Fig. 10
+), and occasionally with smaller spots anterior to groin. Posterior of thighs either uniform orange (
+Fig. 10
+) or with black spot at proximal margin (
+Fig. 10
+). Underside of the hindlimbs lack dark marks (
+Table 5
+).
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+Known from elevations between about 700 and
+1220 m
+a.s.l. on the western and southern Atherton Tablelands (
+Fig. 1
+). Records form an ‘arc’ from the Mt Baldy area (near Atherton) on the western Atherton Tableland, to Ravenshoe and Millaa Millaa in the south, to the Topaz area in the south-east (
+Fig. 1
+). Most sites on the western and southern Atherton Tableland are above
+1000 m
+a.s.l. but some sites in the Millaa Millaa-Topaz area are lower (down to approximately
+700 m
+a.s.l.).
+
+
+
+
+Ecology and reproductive biology.
+Known to breed in both disturbed and natural situations where still or slow-moving water is within, or adjacent to, forest. Breeding sites are ponds (including farms dams; e.g.,
+Fig. 11A
+) and other stationary water bodies (e.g., Mt Hypipamee crater), and slow-flowing pools in streams (e.g.,
+Fig. 11B
+). Breeding occurs in rainforest and wet sclerophyll forest, and in habitats comprising mosaics of grazing land and rainforest, or wet sclerophyll forest. Most known breeding sites are in agricultural land where the frogs reproduce in farm dams or slow pools along disturbed creeklines, but all breeding sites have some forest in close proximity. Prior to extensive clearing of the southern Atherton Tablelands, breeding sites would have been natural ponds and pools along slow flowing streams through rainforest and wet sclerophyll forest.
+
+Males call from riparian vegetation including reeds, sedges, tall grass, and adjacent bushes and trees. Calling has been heard through most of the year except for May and June (FrogID, CJH observations). Males are bright yellow when calling in the breeding season, whereas the few females encountered in the wild in the breeding season have been a more tan-brownish colour (CJH observations). Other aspects of reproductive biology are not known.
+
+Conservation status.
+
+Litoria corbeni
+
+has a small distribution in an upland area, so warrants conservation assessment against IUCN Red List criteria (2012). The EOO (measured as a minimum convex polygon around all known sites) is about
+795 km
+2
+. The actual area occupied within this area (the AOO) would be much smaller, estimated as
+76 km
+2
+. All known sites are above
+700 m
+a.s.l. and most are above
+1000 m
+a.s.l., in an area where there is limited suitable habitat over
+1100 m
+a.s.l. and very little over
+1200 m
+a.s.l.. The highest known record is about
+1220 m
+a.s.l. Additionally, even at higher elevations (e.g.,>
+1000 m
+a.s.l.),
+
+L. corbeni
+
+is patchy in occurrence, and the reason for the patchiness is not known. Whether the known sites represent one ‘location’ (a geographically or ecologically distinct area in which a single threatening event can rapidly affect all individuals;
+IUCN 2012
+) or many can only be assessed based on the perceived threat. Fire may be a threat at wet sclerophyll sites on the west of the distribution, but most sites are associated with rainforest and grazing land in cool, wet areas that are unlikely to burn. Most known sites are on private land, where there is limited protection for regrowth rainforest; hence habitat loss and fragmentation through clearing is also a threat. However, the primary perceived threat is climate change, both gradual warming and the extremes of heatwaves and droughts.
+
+
+Considering climate change as the primary threat, all sites are taken to represent one ‘location’. It is hard to assess this species against Criteria A, C, D and E due to limited data, but it can be assessed against Criterion B. Under Criterion B, with an EOO of
+795 km
+2
+and AOO of
+76 km
+2
+,
+
+Litoria corbeni
+
+fulfils an Endangered B1/B2 (a, b) listing based on: B1 EOO <
+5,000 km
+2
+(but not <
+100 km
+2
+for Critically Endangered), B2 AOO threshold <
+500 km
+2
+(but not <
+10 km
+2
+for Critically Endangered), (a) number of locations <5; and (b) decline inferred or projected in (iii) area, extent and/or quality of habitat, (iv) number of subpopulations, and (v) number of mature individuals due to the ongoing effects of climate change.
+
+
+Conservation of this species should include surveys to find additional breeding sites, monitoring of known breeding sites to assess continued occupancy, and revegetation along gullies throughout its known distribution. The southern Atherton Tablelands, where most populations of
+
+L. corbeni
+
+occur, was once forested but has been extensively cleared. Furthermore, the species occurs in relatively flat areas where it breeds in ponds and slow-moving creeks, which are areas preferred for farming. Most known breeding sites are now in or adjacent to remnant or regrowth rainforest in a matrix of forest patches and cleared gazing land. Although farm dams and gully lines offer breeding habitat, close proximity to forest is vital, so revegetation along gully lines will help to increase the area of rainforest habitat, increase the number of suitable breeding sites, and increase connectivity between them.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/A6/40/0A/A6400A1BFF8EEF63FF6EF908B47DFC68.xml b/data/A6/40/0A/A6400A1BFF8EEF63FF6EF908B47DFC68.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..623f26e262c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/A6/40/0A/A6400A1BFF8EEF63FF6EF908B47DFC68.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,432 @@
+
+
+
+Systematic evaluation of molecular genetic, morphological and acoustic variation reveals three species in the Litoria revelata complex (Anura: Pelodryadidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Price, Luke C.
+School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 Australia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Hoskin, Conrad J.
+College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811 Australia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Mahony, Michael J.
+School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, Australia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Donnellan, Stephen C.
+South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000, Australia & Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 1 William St, Sydney 2010, Australia
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+301
+338
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.1
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.1
+1175-5326
+14853324
+C07BE8E9-713C-42E5-9D3F-5F6166C44C5A
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Litoria revelata
+Ingram, Corben and Hosmer, 1982
+
+
+
+
+Southern Whirring Tree Frog
+
+
+
+Fig. 9
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+
+: QM
+J28233
+, adult male, by original designation. Type locality: O’Reillys, Lamington Plateau, south-eastern
+Queensland
+,
+Australia
+, -28.23°, 153.13°. Collected by
+G. J. Ingram
+,
+
+6 August 1973
+
+.
+Amey & Couper (2022)
+illustrated dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the
+holotype
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 9
+.
+
+Litoria revelata
+
+in life:
+A
+) Dorrigo, NSW, photo Stephen Mahony;
+B
+) Olney State Forest, NSW, photo Stephen Mahony;
+C
+) Watagan National Park, NSW, photo Stephen Mahony;
+D
+) O’Reilly’s, Lamington Plateau, Qld, QM J92494, photo Harry Hines,
+E
+) Heaton State Forest, NSW, photo Stephen Mahony;
+F
+) Wallingat National Park, NSW, photo Stephen Mahony.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis
+.
+
+Litoria revelata
+
+can be diagnosed from
+
+L. littlejohni
+
+and
+
+L. watsoni
+
+by its smaller size (
+23–37 mm
+vs
+43–61 mm
+and
+42–64 mm
+, respectively), and orange, red or yellow groin and posterior thighs with black spots or patches (
+vs
+immaculate orange markings on anterior and posterior surfaces of femur and tibia, in groin, and posterior flanks). Can be diagnosed from
+
+L. ewingii
+
+,
+
+L. paraewingi
+
+and
+
+L. verreauxii
+
+by expanded finger and toe terminal discs (
+vs
+terminal discs similar width or only slightly wider than terminal phalanges). Diagnosed from
+
+L. jervisiensis
+
+by termination of lateral head stripe near forearm (
+vs
+terminating along flank), by having dark patches in groin (
+vs
+absent), and by smaller size (
+23–37 mm
+vs
+37–44 mm
+).
+
+Litoria revelata
+
+can also be diagnosed from
+
+Litoria ewingii
+
+Group species outside the
+
+L. revelata
+
+complex by a greater mean number of notes in call (31,
+vs
+15 in
+
+L. calliscelis
+
+;
+9 in
+
+L. ewingii
+
+;
+4 in
+
+L. jervisiensis
+
+;
+12 in
+
+L. littlejohni
+
+;
+6 in
+
+L. paraewingi
+
+;
+10 in
+
+L. sibilus
+
+;
+23 in
+
+L. verreauxii
+
+; and
+12 in
+
+L. watsoni
+
+).
+
+
+
+Litoria revelata
+
+can be diagnosed from
+
+L. eungellensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+by a combination of an absence of black patches or blotches in all of axilla, groin, posterior thighs and underside of the hindlimbs in most individuals (
+vs
+large prominent black patches and blotches in axilla, groin, posterior thighs and underside of the hindlimb); by smaller females (32.0–
+37.1 mm
+vs
+37.0–
+39.5 mm
+); and by having an advertisement call with higher mean pulse repetition rate (105.3 pps, range 86.9–127.3
+vs
+78.1 pps, range 66.9–86.2).
+
+Litoria revelata
+
+can be diagnosed from
+
+L. corbeni
+
+by a lower mean pulse repetition rate (105.3 pps, range 86.9–127.3
+vs
+130.5 pps, range 127.3–136.7).
+
+Litoria revelata
+
+can be diagnosed further from
+
+L. corbeni
+
+and
+
+L. eungellensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+by apomorphic states at 30 and 10 nucleotide sites respectively in the
+ND4
+gene alignment (
+Table 3
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Measurements of
+holotype
+(mm).
+
+SVL 26.7, HL 8.9, HW 9.1, TL 14.6, TD 1.4, ED 3.2.
+
+
+Description.
+A summary of variation in 14 mensural characters and five ratios is presented in
+Table 4
+. Mean SVL: females = 34 ± 1.23,
+32–37.1 mm
+; males = 28.1 ± 1.2,
+24.7–31.6 mm
+.
+
+
+Snout rounded when viewed from above, blunt in profile. Nostrils more lateral than superior; closer to tip of snout than to eye. Canthus rostralis well defined, straight. Eye relatively large (ED/HL 0.4 ± 0.04, 0.3–0.5); pupil horizontal when constricted (
+Fig. 9
+). Tympanum distinct; oval. Head length about equal to head width (HL/HW 0.98 ± 0.06, 0.7–1.1) and approximately one-third of SVL (HL/SVL 0.29 ± 0.02, 0.20–0.32). Tympanum length about equal to or greater than half eye diameter (TD/ED mean 0.5, 0.4–0.7). Vomerine teeth in semi-circular arc from anterior edge of the choanae to midline of palate (assessed on specimen SAMA R14298).
+
+
+Fingers long, narrow; webbing absent. Subarticular and palmar tubercles prominent. Terminal discs prominent. Fingers in order of length: 3>4>2>1. Hindlimbs moderately long (TL/SVL 0.5 ± 0.02, 0.5–0.6). Toes in order of length: 4>5=3>2=1. Webbing between toes reaches to penultimate phalanges. Subarticular tubercles prominent. Rectangular inner metatarsal tubercle approximately one-quarter length of first toe. Terminal toe discs prominent, smaller than finger discs (
+Fig. 9
+).
+
+Narrow dark brown finely granular nuptial pad wraps around dorsal surface of the base of finger I (SAMA R14298–9).
+Dorsum finely granular. Upper surface of limbs smooth or finely granular. Chin, undersurfaces of limbs, and lateral aspect of abdomen smooth; remainder of abdomen finely granular.
+
+Colour in life.
+Dorsal surfaces tan, cream-brown or reddish-brown, continuing onto flanks; middle dorsum has darker shading starting with well demarked margin between eyes, not obvious in some males in nuptial display colour. Some individuals with small to minute dark flecks over dorsal surfaces and flanks. A black or dark or light brown stripe, with lower margin often poorly defined, extends from nostril along canthus rostralis through eye to just past forearm, sometimes incorporating tympanum. Yellow dorsum in males during calling and amplexus. Abdomen white to cream, but males with yellow or orange throat with some dark flecks, particularly around margin. Vocal sac pigmented light cream to yellow (
+Fig. 9B, C, F
+). Upper iris bright copper-gold, lower iris brown copper gold (
+Fig. 9
+).
+
+
+Axilla with dark brown or black marks in about half of specimens examined (43% of the
+112 specimens
+), remainder with axilla same colour as flanks or the diffuse eye stripe extends across the tympanum onto axilla. Groin yellow or orange, with 64% of specimens having dark patch in groin (
+Fig. 6B, C, D
+), and occasionally smaller dark spots anterior to groin (
+Fig. 2B
+). Posterior of thighs uniform orange (
+Fig. 6A
+) or with black spot at proximal margin (
+Fig. 6B
+), or black dorsal margin (
+Fig. 6C
+), or with black pattern spread across thigh (
+Fig. 6D
+)a. Eight individuals from the northern end of the range (Yabbra State Forest, Tooloom Range, Lamington National Park, Border Ranges National Park, Richmond Range) have black marks on the underside of the hindlimbs (Supplementary
+Table S1
+), otherwise the underside of the hindlimb lacks dark marks (
+Table 5
+).
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+Extends from Main Range (Cunningham’s Gap) and Mt Tamborine in the north, through other south-eastern
+Queensland
+upland areas in the McPherson and Border Ranges and Killarney area, south through coastal ranges and lowlands of northern NSW to the mid NSW coast at Ourimbah State Forest (about halfway between Newcastle and Sydney). Records south of Sydney, at Thirlmere (QM
+J60187
+) and in the Wollongong area (Atlas of Living
+Australia
+), need confirmation because they sit over
+100 km
+south of all other records (
+Fig. 1
+). Some populations are probably disjunct, particularly in the uplands of south-eastern
+Queensland
+and north-eastern NSW. Records are from near sea-level to approximately
+900 m
+a.s.l. Only occurs in mid elevation and upland areas in the north of the range (south-eastern
+Queensland
+and far northern NSW) but occurs at low elevations in the rest of the range.
+
+
+
+
+Ecology and reproductive biology.
+Occupies a wide range of natural and human-modified habitats including: permanent and ephemeral ponds, swamps, dams near forests, and low-flow pools in upland streams in heath, wet or dry sclerophyll forest, and rainforest. In the north of the range occurs predominantly in rainforest, but occupies broader range of habitats in more southerly portions of the range.
+
+
+Males display dynamic sexual dichromatism during the breeding season (
+
+Webster
+et al.
+2023
+
+). Males change colour during calling and amplexus, from tan, brown, grey, or red-brown to brilliant lemon yellow or yellow-brown over much of the dorsum. Calling has been heard in every month of the year with a slight peak in September and the lowest number in June (FrogID).
+Anstis (2017)
+described egg and larval morphology and noted that the sides and venter of tadpoles of
+
+L. revelata
+
+were grey-blue to silver-grey, often with a dull copper sheen (
+vs
+a bluish sheen in
+
+L. eungellensis
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+;
+
+Hero
+et al.
+1996
+
+).
+
+
+Conservation status.
+
+Litoria revelata
+
+does not fulfill a threatened species listing based on assessment against IUCN Red List criteria (2012).
+
+Litoria revelata
+
+has an estimated Extent of Occurrence (EOO) of
+81,348 km
+2
+andArea of Occupancy (AOO) of
+1,852 km
+2
+. The estimated AOO is less than the
+2,000 km
+2
+threshold for Criterion B2 but the species does not meet any additional conditions of that listing level due to a large number of known ‘locations’ and a lack of known, inferred or projected decline in extent or quality of habitat, number of subpopulations, or number of mature individuals. However, this is largely due to a lack of data and population monitoring is required across the distribution. The northern, upland populations in south-eastern
+Queensland
+and far northern
+New South Wales
+are localised and disjunct and may be under threat from climate change; hence they should be a particular focus for monitoring.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/B6/1C/DA/B61CDA7CD90B766F67C0FD7CAF64FD43.xml b/data/B6/1C/DA/B61CDA7CD90B766F67C0FD7CAF64FD43.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3690c3da140
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/B6/1C/DA/B61CDA7CD90B766F67C0FD7CAF64FD43.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+
+
+
+A new species of the genus Thoracibidion Martins, 1960 from Mexico (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae: Tropidini: Tropidina)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Noguera, Felipe A.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+551
+558
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.6
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.6
+1175-5326
+0B9662C8-B0F0-4751-8DBA-A3D2E724731E
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Thoracibidion mariavanessae
+
+new species
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs. 1–4
+,
+5–8
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type material.
+
+Holotype
+male.
+MEXICO
+,
+Jalisco
+,
+Centro Ecoturístico Amixtlán
+,
+
+Municipality of
+San José
+
+del Carmen,
+19°30’16.52”N
+,
+103°42’49.08”W
+,
+
+18-VI-2015
+
+, active at night on dead tree,
+Cols. N. Gutiérrez
+and
+F. A. Noguera
+(
+CNIN
+)
+
+.
+
+Paratypes
+,
+1 male
+,
+1 female
+, same data as holotype (
+EBCC
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+Individuals of this species are very similar to those of
+
+Thoracibidion pleurostictum
+(Bates, 1885)
+
+, but they differ from them by the following characters: the pronotal disc is completely covered with dense pale-golden pubescence that obscures the integument, except for a longitudinal, glabrous fusiform band between the anterior tubercles, from the anterior depression to posterior third, and with four very short transverse carinae only on glabrous area; the elytra are about three times longer than the prothorax and have a narrow dark-brown band on the apex that slightly extends upward close to the suture. In
+
+T. pleurostictum
+
+(
+Figs. 9–12
+and
+13–15
+), individuals have a glabrous, subtriangular, glabrous area on the pronotal disc that is distinctly wider, extending from the middle of the anterior depression obliquely to the anterior tubercles and then descending vertically on the posterior tubercles, and has a greater number of transverse carinae both in front of and behind the middle callus, extending along the glabrous area on the disc; the elytra is about 2.5 times longer than the prothorax, and the dark area of the elytral apex is larger.
+
+
+
+
+
+Description.
+Holotype
+male (
+Figs. 1–4
+).
+
+Integument mostly shiny dark brown; elytra light yellowish brown except dark-brown triangular macula dorsally, from base to anterior quarter, reaching suture, another subtriangular dark-brown macula on middle, from epipleural margin to side of dorsal surface, one narrow dark-brown band apically, projected upward close to suture on posterior sixth, and a longitudinal dark-brown band on anterior quarter, located beneath humerus and adjacent to epipleural margin.
+
+
+Head.
+Frons inclined anteriorly inward, areolate-rugose, with sparse, fine, translucent, whitish, and pale brightyellowish pubescence not obscuring integument. Median groove reaching postclypeus anteriorly and extending to vertex posteriorly, deeper between antennal tubercles and slightly raised between upper eye lobes. Frontoclypeal sulcus deeply curved, extending to pretentorial pits. Anteclypeus and postclypeus transversely depressed, forming a moderately raised keel between them, both glabrous and smooth, except for a widely scattered erect setae. Labrum transversely angled on basal third and with lateral and apical margins curved. Interantennal space wide, 1.7 times the width of one upper ocular lobe, strongly depressed, with a median longitudinal elevation on each side extending from base of antennal tubercle to middle of frons. Antennal tubercles prominent, with thickened upper margins and internal apex with a prominent triangular projection with subacute apex. Upper interocular space with an elongated depression on each side of median groove, extending from base of antennal tubercle to apex of eye. Vertex areolate-rugose, with pubescence similar to that on frons, which disappears close to prothorax. Lower eye lobes prominent, with coarse ommatidia. Genae triangular, with a rounded apex, 0.4 times the width of lower eye lobe. Upper ocular lobes with three rows of ommatidia, separated by 2.5 times their width. Antennae 1.9 times longer than body, extending beyond elytral apex about middle of seventh antennomere; with fine pale-gray and pale-yellowish pubescence, sparser toward apical segments, except scape and pedicel with very sparse pubescence, with dorsal portion of scape almost glabrous; from pedicel to seventh antennomere with a fringe of erect setae on ventral margin, sparser toward seventh, scape with erect setae only on basal third and antennomeres eight to ten with an erect seta on each side of apex. Scape pyriform, with a longitudinal depression dorsally on basal third, deep on base and shallower toward its apex; pedicel constricted basally; antennomeres third to sixth with a distinct, defined dark longitudinal carina dorsally; last antennomere slightly curved. Antennal formula based (proportion) on length of antennomere III: scape = 0.48; pedicel = 0.20, IV = 0.93, V = 0.96, VI = 1.03, VII = 1.00, VIII = 0.96, IX = 0.93, X = 0.86, XI = 1.20.
+
+
+
+FIGURES 1–4.
+
+Thoracibidion mariavanessae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+, holotype male:
+1)
+Dorsal habitus;
+2)
+Lateral habitus;
+3)
+Ventral habitus;
+4)
+Head, frontal view.
+
+
+
+Thorax.
+Prothorax 1.6 times longer than wide; sides nearly straight, slightly constricted posteriorly. Pronotum with a broad, transverse depression on posterior third and another narrower, bisinuate anteriorly; disc with four tubercles: two on middle, subconical and slightly prominent, and two adjacent to posterior depression, slightly more lateral than the former, oblique, slightly curved, and formed by two contiguous rough areas; a very slightly prominent median callus, narrow, ovoid, with shallow, irregular rugosities, and four moderately elevated, transverse carinae behind median callus; with dense pale-golden pubescence obscuring integument except for a longitudinal, glabrous fusiform band between the anterior tubercles, from the anterior depression to posterior third. Prosternum longitudinally convex; anterior half with a semicircular glabrous area with fine, low transverse rugosities that extend to the sides of the prothorax, where it is bordered posteriorly by a carina; remainder surface covered with dense pubescence similar to that of pronotum, but somewhat shorter. Prosternal process narrow, 0.15 times width of procoxal cavity at mid-height, longitudinally depressed, with curved and elevated lateral margins, distinctly narrowed centrally, strongly widened apically, and with rounded apex; covered with dense pale-golden pubescence. Mesoventrite sloping, slightly longitudinally convex, centrally as long as width of mesocoxa, with dense pale-golden pubescence. Mesanepisterna and mesepimera with pubescence as on mesoventrite. Mesoventral process 0.6 times width of mesocoxa at its mid-section, with curved sides, strongly widened distally, apex truncate and semicircular notched centrally; with dense pale-golden pubescence. Metaventrite with discrimen not reaching anterior margin; with dense pale-golden pubescence, except glabrous area close to discrimen, which has scattered few shallow punctures, each with a long, semi-erect setae. Elytra 3.5 times longer than wide, parallel-sided on anterior 2/3, curved, gradually narrowed toward apex on posterior third; apex emarginate, with short triangular projection on sutural angle and spine-like projection on outer angle; without pubescence except for a few pubescence on epipleural margin and apex; finely punctate, each puncture with long, sub-erect seta, setae shorter and more superficial toward elytral apex, arranged serially in four clearly defined lines on disc from near anterior margin to almost apex. Legs. Profemur strongly widened on middle; with a broad and moderately deep depression from base to middle of ventral surface; with moderately dense pale-golden pubescence except glabrous ventral surface which has very sparse sub-erect setae; meso- and metafemur moderately pedunculate; with basal half laterally flattened; covered with dense pale-golden pubescence and sub-erect setae throughout, more abundant on dorsal and ventral sides. Protibia curved, with a dark carina on inner and outer sides extending from base to middle; covered with short, sub-erect setae throughout and long setae interspersed; meso- and metatibia straight, with a dark carina on inner and outer sides extending from base to near apex; with sparse pubescence on outer side and abundant, long, sub-erect setae on inner side and dorsal and ventral surfaces. Dorsal surface of tarsi with short, sub-erect pale-golden setae and some long setae interspersed; protarsi with the first segment shorter than II–III combined; meso- and metatarsi with first segment longer than II–III combined.
+
+
+Abdomen.
+Ventrites with pale-gray, shiny, sericeous pubescence obscuring integument, except central apex of first four ventrites, which are glabrous and have numerous long, sub-erect setae; remaining surface of all ventrites sparse, long, erect setae somewhat more abundant toward sides; fifth ventrite slightly shorter than fourth, with a rounded apex.
+
+
+
+Female (
+Figs 5–8
+).
+
+Similar in shape to male but differs as follows: antennae 1.2 times longer than body, extending beyond apex of elytra about middle of ninth antennomere; with antennal formula based (proportion) on length of antennomere III: scape = 0.51; pedicel = 0.18, IV = 0.75, V = 0.84, VI = 0.81, VII = 0.84, VIII = 0.66, IX = 0.63, X = 0.57, XI = 0.66; fifth abdominal ventrite longer than fourth and with a superficial, transverse oval depression on last third.
+
+
+
+
+Etymology.
+This species is dedicated to María Vanessa, my life partner for the past twenty years. Together, we have shared both the joys and challenges of life and have raised five wonderful children. I am deeply grateful to her for all of it.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURES 5–8.
+
+Thoracibidion mariavanessae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+, paratype female:
+5)
+Dorsal habitus;
+6)
+Lateral habitus;
+7)
+Ventral habitus;
+8)
+Head, frontal view.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURES 9–12.
+
+Thoracibidion pleurostictum
+(Bates, 1885)
+
+, lectotype male:
+9)
+Doral habitus,
+10)
+Lateral habitus,
+11)
+Head, frontal view,
+12)
+Collection and determination labels.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURES 13–15.
+
+Thoracibidion pleutostictum
+(Bates, 1885)
+
+:
+13)
+Male from Chiapas, Mexico;
+14)
+Male from Palo Seco, Costa Rica;
+15)
+Female from Bugaba, Panama.
+
+
+
+
+Dimensions in mm.
+Holotype
+male, total length, 15.0; prothoracic length, 3.1; basal prothoracic length, 2.0; humeral width, 3.0; elytral length, 9.5.
+Paratype
+female, total length, 15.4; prothoracic length, 3.0; basal prothoracic length, 2.1; humeral width, 3.0; elytral length, 10.2.
+Paratype
+male, total length, 15.7; prothoracic length, 3.4; basal prothoracic length, 2.3; humeral width, 3.2; elytral length, 9.9.
+
+
+
+
+Remarks.
+This species represents the northernmost record of the genus
+
+Thoracibidion
+
+recorded to date.
+
+Thoracibidion buquetii
+(Thomson, 1867)
+
+is recorded from
+Mexico
+, but without any known locality so far (
+Monné 2024
+), and
+
+T. pleurostictum
+
+is recorded only from the state of
+Chiapas
+(
+Monné 2024
+).
+
+
+Regarding
+
+T. pleurostictum
+
+, individuals of this species show variation throughout their known distribution (see
+Fig. 13–15
+), with the integument ranging from reddish-brown to dark brown or fuscous, and the spots on the middle and apex of the elytra varying in size and shape. However, the width of the glabrous area on the pronotal disc and the length and number of transverse carinae on this area are consistent among the individuals observed.
+
+
+Acknowledgments.
+Thanks to Keita Matsumoto and Maxwell V. L. Barclay (BMNH) for the photographs of the
+lectotype
+of
+
+Thoracibidion pleurostictum
+
+, to Antonio Santos-Silva (MZSP) for the photographs of this species from Chiapas,
+Costa Rica
+, and
+Panama
+, and to Enrique Ramírez García (EBCC) for taking the photographs of the
+holotype
+and
+paratype
+of
+
+T. mariavanessae
+
+sp. nov.
+Also, to Nayeli Gutiérrez for her company during the fieldwork for the collection of the type material. Antonio Santos-Silva and Larry Bezark reviewed and made very valuable suggestions that enriched the manuscript.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/C2/26/87/C22687894240FFAF5594F9E711C36B45.xml b/data/C2/26/87/C22687894240FFAF5594F9E711C36B45.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..405126fb0ac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/C2/26/87/C22687894240FFAF5594F9E711C36B45.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+
+
+
+Discovery of Papilio bianor Cramer, 1777 (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in the Central Ryukyus, Japan: inference of the dispersal pathway based on morphological and genetic analyses
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Makita, Shu
+0009-0006-9850-4742
+Department of Global Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113 - 8657, Japan.
+shu1014my@gmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Arata, Satoshi
+Futao II, 125 - 1 - 103 Kawata, Uruma-shi, Okinawa 904 - 2232, Japan.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Ito, Hayato
+0009-0005-2007-9208
+The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113 - 0033, Japan.
+seafort612@gmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Osawa, Natsuko
+0009-0005-3702-721X
+The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113 - 0033, Japan.
+mameusa0817@gmail.com
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Endo, Hideki
+Department of Global Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113 - 8657, Japan. & The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113 - 0033, Japan.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Yago, Masaya
+Department of Global Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113 - 8657, Japan. & The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113 - 0033, Japan.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-10
+
+
+5584
+
+
+3
+
+
+339
+352
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.2
+
+journal article
+308090
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.2
+614f4237-5f94-484c-b504-49d77c2bb6cd
+1175-5326
+14853362
+8D7118AC-19AB-440C-AB88-747F946A17D2
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Papilio
+(
+Achillides
+)
+bianor thrasymedes
+Fruhstorfer, 1909
+
+
+
+
+
+Specimen data:
+
+One female
+(
+Figs 1–2
+),
+
+31. viii. 2016
+
+(8:29 am), Ishika [
+Sesoko Island
+], Motobu-cho,
+Okinawa Prefecture
+,
+Japan
+,
+Satoshi Arata
+leg. (
+S. Arata’s
+private collection), forewing length
+66 mm
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Notes:
+This individual was collected while sucking the nectar of
+
+Hibiscus rosa
+
+in the garden of a house along the farm road on the south coast of Sesoko Island. As the butterfly was female, the second author attempted to extract eggs from its abdomen but did not obtain any. Therefore, it is possible that it laid eggs around Sesoko Island. However, it should also be noted that, instead of eggs, a larger amount of body fat was stored.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/F1/7D/7D/F17D7D2D1239FF835584FA6BFED7F9D7.xml b/data/F1/7D/7D/F17D7D2D1239FF835584FA6BFED7F9D7.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..43c69825f31
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/F1/7D/7D/F17D7D2D1239FF835584FA6BFED7F9D7.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,464 @@
+
+
+
+New species and new records of Glyptoma Erichson, 1839 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Klemann-Junior, Louri
+Laboratório de Biodiversidade, Ecologia e Conservação de Ecossistemas Amazônicos, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, entro de Estudos Superiores de Itacoatiara, 69100 - 000 Itacoatiara, Amazonas, Brazil. & Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia para Recursos Amazônicos, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, 69100 - 000 Itacoatiara, Amazonas, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Moura, Roberta Souza De
+Afya Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. Estrada do Aeroporto c / Rodovia AM 010 2705 Poranga, 69.100 - 600 Itacoatiara, Amazonas, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Irmler, Ulrich
+Institute of Ecosystem Research, Department of Applied Ecology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Asenjo, Angélico
+Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru. & Departamento de Entomología, Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+539
+550
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.5
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.5
+1175-5326
+85CD8436-7DEB-4C25-90EA-E5E12C30D8E5
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Glyptoma luae
+Klemann-Junior, Moura, Irmler & Asenjo
+
+,
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+https://zoobank.org/
+
+urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
+43CC70E2-4C6E-46A1-BE67-41F6B1CD5EAD
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs 2A–C
+)
+
+
+
+
+Type material
+(
+
+15
+♂♂
+
+,
+
+8
+♀♀
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+:
+BRAZIL
+:
+
+♂
+, labeled: “
+Brasil
+: AM,
+Carauari
+|
+Sítio da Tia Neuza
+,
+Manual
+|
+
+01.i.2020
+
+, Madeira podre |
+4 °49’22.73’’S
+/
+66°54’25.30’’W
+|
+R.S.Moura
+| CESIT - UEA”, “
+HOLOTYPE
+|
+
+Glyptoma
+
+|
+
+luae
+
+sp. nov.
+| Desig. Klemann-Junior
+et al.
+2024” (
+INPA
+)
+
+.
+
+Paratypes
+
+(
+14♂♂
+,
+8♀♀
+),
+
+labeled: “
+Brasil
+: AM,
+Itapiranga
+|
+Faz. Caribi - Madeira
+podre |
+
+16.xii.2019
+
+|
+2°32’55.74’’S
+/
+58°48’24.21’’W
+|
+L.Klemann-Junior
+;
+R.S.Moura
+| CESIT - UEA” (
+5♂♂
+,
+1♀
+INPA
+)
+
+;
+
+“
+Brasil
+: AM,
+Itapiranga
+|
+Faz. Caribi - Madeira
+podre |
+
+17.xii.2019
+
+|
+2°32’50.48’’S
+/
+58°48’23.16’’W
+|
+R.S.Moura
+;
+L.Klemann-Junior
+| CESIT - UEA” (
+2♂♂
+CEMT
+,
+2♂♂
+UFPR,
+1♀
+INPA
+;
+2♀♀
+UEA
+)
+
+;
+
+“
+Brasil
+: AM,
+Carauari
+|
+Col. Manual
+(
+Mad. Podre
+) |
+
+05.i.2020
+
+|
+4°49’22,73’’S
+/
+66°54’26,30’’W
+| R.S.Moura;
+A.S.Santos
+| CESIT - UEA” (
+1♀
+CEMT
+)
+
+;
+
+“
+Brasil
+:AM [
+Amazonas
+state],
+Carauari
+|
+Sítio da Tia Neuza
+,
+Manual
+|
+
+01.i.2020
+
+, Madeira podre |
+4°49’22.73’’S
+/
+66°54’25.30’’W
+|
+R.S.Moura
+| CESIT - UEA” (
+3♂♂
+UEA
+,
+1♂
+CEMT
+,
+1♂
+UFPR,
+1♀
+CEMT
+,
+2♀♀
+UFPR
+). All
+paratypes
+with yellow label “
+PARATYPE
+|
+
+Glyptoma
+
+|
+
+luae
+
+sp. nov.
+| Desig. Klemann-Junior
+et al.
+2024”
+
+.
+
+
+
+FIGURE 2.
+
+Glyptoma luae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+Holotype
+(C),
+Paratype
+(A, C)
+;
+A
+. Head, Pronotum and Elytra;
+B.
+Antenna;
+C.
+Aedeagus.
+
+
+
+Labels abbreviations, translations, and explanations:
+AM =
+Amazonas state
+; CESIT - UEA = Centro de Estudos Superiores de Itacoatiara - Universidade do
+Estado do Amazonas
+= written in a vertical line on the left side; Col. Manual (Mad. podre) = Coleta Manual (Madeira Podre) = captured manually under bark in decaying trunks and branches; Faz. = Fazenda = farm; Madeira podre = captured manually under bark in decaying trunks and branches; Manual = captured manually.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+Among species of the
+
+G. cognatum
+
+group (with size between 1.8 and
+3.2 mm
+, the setiferous punctures on the pronotum and elytra are at least partly shiny)
+
+G. luae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+is as long as
+
+G. schuhi
+
+and
+
+G. obscuricolle
+
+. However,
+
+G. luae
+
+can be differentiated from these two species by the presence of two almost regular and parallel rows of punctures along the entire length of the space between the suture and discal carina (at least partly three irregular rows of punctures in
+
+G. schuhi
+
+and two irregular rows of elongate punctures in
+
+G. obscuricolle
+
+); by the head, pronotum and elytra without microsculpture (isodiametric microsculpture in
+
+G. obscuricolle
+
+); by the larger punctures on the head (finely punctuate on
+
+G. obscuricolle
+
+); and by the distinctive form of the aedeagus. The median lobe of the aedeagus of
+
+G. luae
+
+is longer than the median lobe of
+
+G. obscuricolle
+
+. The basal bulb of
+
+G. luae
+
+, at the point of insertion of the parameres, has a straight upwards line before curved to the median lobe, whereas in
+
+G. obscuricolle
+
+has a downwards curve (in lateral view with apex pointed to right) before curved to the median lobe. Parameres of the aedeagus of
+
+G. luae
+
+is bigger (reaching almost the half of the median lobe), sinuate, and with a “J” shape, whereas in
+
+G. schuhi
+
+is short (reaching the basal fourth of the median lobe) and slightly sinuate.
+
+
+Description.
+Holotype
+male, BL:
+3.13 mm
+, FL:
+1.5 mm
+.
+
+Coloration: dark reddish brown; antennae and legs light reddish brown.
+
+Head (
+Figure 2A
+) wider (HW: 0.51) than long (HL: 0.40); subrectangular; with rounded hind and anterior angles; large eyes slightly prominent and longer than temples; sides in front of eyes parallel up to base of antennae; at base of antennae with almost rectangular angle that narrowed to anterior edge of clypeus in a sinuate curve; anterior edge of clypeus less wide than half of width between base of antennae. Head with setiferous punctures moderately dense and deep; punctures not elongate; each puncture with a yellow seta; on average, interstices between punctures less wide than half of diameter of punctures. Integument and punctures of head without microsculpture, shiny. Neck appearing matt due to dense microsculpture formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures. Antenna (
+Figure 2B
+) slightly longer than head and pronotum together; antennomeres 2–10 gradually and smoothly widening anteriorly; antennomere 2 slightly narrower than antennomere 1; antennomeres 2–10 slightly wider than long; antennomere 11 narrower and longer than antennomere 10; all antennomeres with numerous long yellow setae; setae approximately as long as width of antennomeres.
+
+
+Pronotum (
+Figure 2A
+) wider than long (PL: 0.43; PW: 0.48); widest in anterior third; narrowed to anterior widely rounded angles in smooth convex curve; narrowed to posterior obtuse angles in smooth concave curve. Pronotum with setiferous punctures dense and deep; with some coalescent punctures without evident ridges; each puncture with a yellow seta; width of punctures irregular; interstitial ridges between punctures of variable size. Integument of pronotum without microsculpture; surface of punctures with few micropunctures; shiny.
+
+
+Elytra (
+Figure 2A
+) wider than pronotum; longer than wide (EL: 0.67; EW: 0.62); wildest in middle; shoulders well developed and rounded; posterior angles rounded; anterior edge of elytra concave. Discal carina distinct; partly irregular or broken due to the punctures; slightly curved outward. Lateral carina indistinctly restricted shortly behind shoulders. Suture marked by line of 9–10 smaller, coalescent, setiferous punctures. Space between suture and discal carina with two almost regular and parallel rows of setiferous punctures along entire length of elytra, each row with 8 to 9 elongated punctures; some coalescent punctures without evident ridges. Laterally to discal carina another two almost regular and parallel rows of setiferous punctures along entire length of elytra; more lateral to these two lines, slightly smaller sparse setiferous punctures present. Each puncture with a yellow seta; setae in asymmetric position to centre of punctures; interstices of the punctures mostly restricted to small ridges. Integument of elytra without microsculpture; surface of punctures with few micropunctures; shiny.
+
+
+Legs (
+Figure 2A
+) almost completely covered with yellow setae; surface appearing matt, with transverse striate microsculpture.
+
+Abdomen with dense and large setiferous punctation; each with one yellow seta; interstices between punctures restricted to small ridges; punctures on segments 3-6 deep; punctures on segments 7 and 8 less deep. Surface of abdomen with microsculpture formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures; micropunctures less deep on interstices between punctures and on segments 7 and 8; segments 3–6 appearing matt, except for shiny intersticies between punctures; segments 7 and 8 appearing shiny; anterior border of all segments appearing matt due to presence of micropunctures; posterior border of all segments appearing shiny due to absence of micropunctures.
+
+Aedeagus as in (
+Figure 2C
+.) In lateral view, paramere small and pointed, slightly sinuate, with its apex reaching half of median lobe. Median lobe in lateral view curved, bulbous at base, with its apical region converging to narrow pointed apex; apical region with numerous sensilla.
+
+Female similar to male.
+
+Variation. Total length 3.0 to
+3.2 mm
+.
+Three specimens
+are lighter reddish brown; punctures and interstices pattern on the head, pronotum and elytra, and shapes of the antennomeres were consistent among the specimens examined.
+
+
+Habitat. Captured manually under bark in decaying trunks and branches. The capture sites are destined for selective logging or rural production and the vegetation is second-growth Evergreen Tropical Forest “Floresta Ombrófila Densa de Terras Baixas” (
+
+Veloso
+et al.
+1991
+
+).
+
+
+Distribution. Known from the municipalities of Itapiranga and Carauari in Amazonas State,
+Brazil
+.
+
+Etymology. The species is named after the daughter of the two first authors, Lua de Moura Klemann; it is a noun in apposition.
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/F1/7D/7D/F17D7D2D123BFF8D5584F933FC68FADB.xml b/data/F1/7D/7D/F17D7D2D123BFF8D5584F933FC68FADB.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3c8ef49862f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/F1/7D/7D/F17D7D2D123BFF8D5584F933FC68FADB.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,390 @@
+
+
+
+New species and new records of Glyptoma Erichson, 1839 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Klemann-Junior, Louri
+Laboratório de Biodiversidade, Ecologia e Conservação de Ecossistemas Amazônicos, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, entro de Estudos Superiores de Itacoatiara, 69100 - 000 Itacoatiara, Amazonas, Brazil. & Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia para Recursos Amazônicos, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, 69100 - 000 Itacoatiara, Amazonas, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Moura, Roberta Souza De
+Afya Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. Estrada do Aeroporto c / Rodovia AM 010 2705 Poranga, 69.100 - 600 Itacoatiara, Amazonas, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Irmler, Ulrich
+Institute of Ecosystem Research, Department of Applied Ecology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Asenjo, Angélico
+Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru. & Departamento de Entomología, Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+539
+550
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.5
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.5
+1175-5326
+85CD8436-7DEB-4C25-90EA-E5E12C30D8E5
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Glyptoma malkini
+Irmler, Klemann-Junior, Moura & Asenjo
+
+,
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+https://zoobank.org/
+
+urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
+00ECE7D7-22D1-4C70-BB21-24A189D173E8
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs 3A–C
+)
+
+
+
+
+Type material
+(
+2♂♂
+, 1unsexed due to lost abdomen)
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+:
+BRAZIL
+:
+
+♂
+, labeled: “Brasil:
+Para
+]; Aldeia | Coraci,
+12 km
+W. of Ca- | ninde.
+R. Gurupi. Leg
+: |
+B. Malkin.
+24:IV:1963.”, “under | bark”, “
+Holo-
+| type”, “
+Glyptoma
+| malkini | det.
+U. Irmler
+” (
+FMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+Paratypes
+
+(
+1♂
+, 1 unsexed), labeled: “Brasil:
+Para
+; Aldeia | Coraci,
+12 km
+W. of Ca- | ninde.
+R. Gurupi. Leg
+: |
+B. Malkin.
+24: IV:1963.”, “under | bark”, “
+Para-
+| type”, “
+Glyptoma
+| malkini | det.
+U. Irmler
+” (
+1♂
+, 1 unsexed
+FMNH
+)
+
+.
+
+
+Labels abbreviations, translations, and explanations:
+
+Para
+=
+Pará state
+; Aldeia | Coraci = Coraci indigenous village; Ca- | ninde.=
+Canindé Village
+;
+R. Gurupi.
+=
+Gurupi River
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+FIGURE 3.
+
+Glyptoma malkini
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+Holotype;
+A
+. Head, Pronotum and Elytra;
+B.
+Antenna;
+C.
+Aedeagus.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+Among species of the
+
+G. cognatum
+
+group (with body length between 1.8 and
+3.2 mm
+, setiferous punctures on the pronotum and elytra at least partly shiny)
+
+G. malkini
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+is similar to
+
+G. luae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+and
+
+G. nitens
+
+in the presence of two rows of punctures in the posterior half of the space between suture and discal carina. However,
+
+G. malkini
+
+can be differentiated from
+
+G. luae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+and
+
+G. nitens
+
+by the body length (body length of
+
+G. malkini
+
+is
+2.1 mm
+; body length of
+
+G. luae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+is 3.0-
+3.2 mm
+; and body length of
+
+G. nitens
+
+is
+2.6–2.9 mm
+); by the integument of the head appearing matt (shiny in
+
+G. luae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+and
+
+G. nitens
+
+); by the slightly elongate punctures on the head (punctures not elongate in
+
+G. luae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+and
+
+G. nitens
+
+); by the distinctly wider than long antennomeres 2-10 (slightly wider than long in
+
+G. luae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+and
+
+G. nitens
+
+); by the pronotum with dense microsculpturing formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures, appearing matt, and ridges in some parts without microsculpture, appearing shiny (the pronotum of
+
+G. luae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+the shiny integument lacks microsculpture and the surface of the punctures have few micropunctures; in
+
+G. nitens
+
+the microsculpture is restricted to the surface of punctures and the integument is shiny); by the presence of two parallel regular rows of punctures between suture and discal carina (there are two parallel, irregular rows of punctures in
+
+G. nitens
+
+); and by the distinctive shape of the aedeagus. The aedeagus has two sensilla at the base of the median lobe (the median lobe has numerous sensilla in
+
+G. luae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+and
+
+G. nitens
+
+); the parameres are narrow (broad in
+
+G. nitens
+
+); the parameres are strongly curved (it is slightly sinuate, with a “J” shape, in
+
+G. luae
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+).
+
+
+Description:
+Holotype
+male, BL:
+2.1 mm
+, FL:
+1.07 mm
+.
+
+Coloration: black; legs brown.
+
+Head (
+Figure 3A
+) wider (HW:
+0.38 mm
+) than long (HL:0.26); subrectangular; eyes large, prominent; four times as long as temples; temples narrowed in smooth curve to neck; neck two thirds as wide as head; sides in front of eyes parallel; preocular part as long as length of eyes; anterior margin slightly convex. Head with large and dense setiferous punctation; vertex more densely punctate than clypeus; punctures slightly elongate; vertex with interstices between punctures approximately half as wide as diameter of punctures; surface of interstices and punctures with dense microsculpturing formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures; appearing matt. Neck appearing matt due to dense microsculpture formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures. Antennae (
+Figure 3B
+) as long as head and pronotum combined; first antennomere approximately quadrate; antennomeres 2–10 distinctly wider than long; antennomere 2 one fourth wider than long; antennomere 10 twice as wide as long; antennomere 11 narrower and longer than antennomere 10; all antennomeres with long yellow apical setae; setae approximately as long as width of antennomeres.
+
+
+Pronotum (
+Figure 3A
+) wider (PW:
+0.35 mm
+) than long (PL:
+0.32 mm
+); widest shortly behind anterior angles; anterior half slightly narrowed; posterior half narrowed in deep concave curve to posterior angles; posterior margin slightly concave; surface with deep, coarse, dense setiferous punctuation;; interstices between punctures reduced to narrow ridges; interstices approximately one tenth as wide as diameter of punctures; yellow setae in asymmetric position to centre of punctures; seta in some cases inserted nearly on ridge; dense microsculpturing formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures, appearing matt; ridges in some parts without microsculpture, appearing shiny.
+
+
+Elytra (
+Figure 3A
+) longer (EL:
+0.49 mm
+) than wide (EW:
+0.43 mm
+); sides slightly convex; widest close to middle; shoulders well developed and rounded; posterior angles rounded; shoulders not projected forward. Discal carina distinct; slightly curved outward. Lateral carina behind shoulder short and indistinct. Suture marked by a line of six smaller coalescent setiferous punctures. Space between suture and discal carina with two rows of setiferous punctures along entire length of elytra. Space laterad of discal carina with two additional rows of setiferous punctures along entire length of elytra. Each puncture carrying yellow seta; seta in asymmetric position to centre of punctures; interstices between punctures evident as small ridges. Integument of elytra without microsculpture; surface of punctures with dense microsculpturing formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures; appearing shiny.
+
+Legs almost completely covered with yellow setae; surface appearing matt, with microridges organized with cells.
+Abdomen with dense, large setiferous punctation; each puncture with yellow seta; insertion of setae slightly asymmetric;interstices between punctures restricted to small ridges.Surface of punctures with dense microsculpturing formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures; surface of ridges between punctures shiny.
+
+Aedeagus as in (
+Figure 3C
+.) In lateral view, paramere curved, with its apex reaching base of 1/3 apical region of median lobe. Median lobe in lateral view curved, bulbous at base with two sensilla, its apical region converging to narrow pointed apex and with elongate tubular endophallus.
+
+Female unknown.
+
+Variation. No variations were observed among the
+three specimens
+examined.
+
+Habitat. Collected under bark. The vegetation is Evergreen Tropical Forest.
+
+Distribution. Known from the municipality of Paragominas in
+Pará State
+,
+Brazil
+.
+
+
+Etymology. The species name honors the collector of the species, Borys Malkin, who collected
+Staphylinidae
+in many Central and South American countries; it is a noun in apposition.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/F1/7D/7D/F17D7D2D123FFF815584FDCFFBBFFA3F.xml b/data/F1/7D/7D/F17D7D2D123FFF815584FDCFFBBFFA3F.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e2edebe96f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/F1/7D/7D/F17D7D2D123FFF815584FDCFFBBFFA3F.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,469 @@
+
+
+
+New species and new records of Glyptoma Erichson, 1839 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Klemann-Junior, Louri
+Laboratório de Biodiversidade, Ecologia e Conservação de Ecossistemas Amazônicos, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, entro de Estudos Superiores de Itacoatiara, 69100 - 000 Itacoatiara, Amazonas, Brazil. & Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia para Recursos Amazônicos, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, 69100 - 000 Itacoatiara, Amazonas, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Moura, Roberta Souza De
+Afya Faculdade de Ciências Médicas. Estrada do Aeroporto c / Rodovia AM 010 2705 Poranga, 69.100 - 600 Itacoatiara, Amazonas, Brazil.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Irmler, Ulrich
+Institute of Ecosystem Research, Department of Applied Ecology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Asenjo, Angélico
+Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru. & Departamento de Entomología, Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru.
+
+text
+
+
+Zootaxa
+
+
+2025
+
+2025-02-11
+
+
+5584
+
+
+4
+
+
+539
+550
+
+
+
+
+https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.5
+
+journal article
+10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.5
+1175-5326
+85CD8436-7DEB-4C25-90EA-E5E12C30D8E5
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Glyptoma curupira
+Klemann-Junior, Moura, Irmler & Asenjo
+
+,
+sp. nov.
+
+
+
+
+https://zoobank.org/
+
+urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
+3C4F617C-227F-4A85-B385-0C1D2324E5BE
+
+
+
+
+
+(
+Figs 1A–C
+)
+
+
+
+
+Type material
+(
+2♂♂
+,
+4♀♀
+).
+
+
+
+
+Holotype
+:
+BRAZIL
+:
+
+♂
+, labeled: “
+Brasil
+: AM,
+Itapiranga
+| Faz. Caribi - Madeira podre |
+
+16.xii.2019
+
+|
+2°32’ 55,74’’S
+/
+58°48’24,21’’W
+|
+L.Klemann-Junior
+;
+R.S.Moura
+| CESIT - UEA”, “
+HOLOTYPE
+|
+
+Glyptoma
+
+|
+
+curupira
+
+sp. nov.
+| Desig. Klemann-Junior
+et al.
+2024” (
+INPA
+)
+
+.
+
+Paratypes
+
+(
+1♂
+,
+4♀♀
+),
+
+labeled: “
+Brasil
+: AM,
+Itacoatiara
+|
+Faz. Imperial–Manual
+|
+
+02.xii.2019
+
+–Mad. Podre |
+3°00’46,27’’S
+/
+58°28’44,50’’W
+|
+L.Klemann-Junior
+;
+R.S.Moura
+| CESIT - UEA” (
+1 ♀
+UEA
+)
+
+;
+
+“
+Brasil
+: AM,
+Itapiranga
+|
+Faz. Caribi - Madeira
+podre |
+
+16.xii.2019
+
+|
+2°32’55,74’’S
+/5
+8°48’24,21’’W
+|
+L.Klemann-Junior
+;
+R.S.Moura
+| CESIT - UEA” (
+1♂
+UEA
+,
+1♀
+INPA
+)
+
+;
+
+“
+Brasil
+: AM,
+Silves
+|
+Faz. Caribi - Madeira
+podre |
+
+16.xii.2019
+
+|
+2°32’55,74’’S
+/
+58°48’24,21’’W
+|
+R.S.Moura
+;
+L.F.B.Pereira
+| CESIT - UEA” (
+1 ♀
+UFPR
+)
+
+;
+
+“
+Brasil
+: AM,
+Itapiranga
+|
+Faz. Caribe
+-
+Col. Manual
+(
+Mad.
+podre) |
+
+17.xii.2019
+
+|
+2°32’50,48’’S
+/
+58°48’23, 16’’W
+|
+L.Klemann-Junior
+;
+R.S.Moura
+| CESIT - UEA” (
+1 ♀
+CEMT
+)
+
+.
+
+All
+paratypes
+with yellow label “
+PARATYPE
+|
+
+Glyptoma
+
+|
+
+curupira
+
+sp. nov.
+| Desig. Klemann-Junior
+et al.
+2024”
+
+.
+
+
+Labels abbreviations, translations, and explanations:
+AM =
+Amazonas state
+; CESIT - UEA = Centro de Estudos Superiores de Itacoatiara - Universidade do
+Estado do Amazonas
+= written in a vertical line on the left side; Col. Manual (Mad. podre) = Coleta Manual (Madeira Podre) = captured manually under bark in decaying trunks and branches; Faz. = Fazenda = farm; Mad. Podre = Madeira podre = captured manually under bark in decaying trunks and branches; Manual = captured manually.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+Among species of the
+
+G. cicatricosa
+
+group (with size≥
+3.5 mm
+and relatively long antenna)
+
+G.curupira
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+is similar to
+
+G. opacum
+
+in size and the totally matt surface. However,
+
+G. curupira
+
+can be differentiated from
+
+G. opacum
+
+by the size of the punctures of the head, pronotum and elytra, size of the interstices between the punctures, by the shapes of the antennomeres, and by the distinctive shape of the aedeagus. In
+
+G. curupira
+
+the size of the punctures on the head and pronotum are subequal to punctures on the elytra (the largest punctures on the head and pronotum are the same size as the smallest punctures on the elytra); in
+
+G. opacum
+
+punctures on the elytra are much larger than those on the head and pronotum. In
+
+G. curupira
+
+punctures on clypeus smaller and sparser than on vertex; in
+
+G. opacum
+
+the clypeus is more sparsely punctate and the punctures equal in size to those of the vertex. In
+
+G. curupira
+
+the interstices between the punctures on the head, pronotum, and elytra vary from 1/2 to 1/5 as wide as the diameter of the punctures; in
+
+G. opacum
+
+the interstices between the punctures are less than 1/4 as wide as the diameter of the punctures on the head, the interstices are indistinct and irregular on the elytra. In
+
+G. curupira
+
+, antennomeres 5–10 are slightly wider than long, the length of the setae are about 0.9 the width of the antennomeres; in
+
+G. opacum
+
+, antennomeres 5-10 are quadrate or slightly longer than wide, and the setae are half as long as the width of the antennomeres. The apical part of the median lobe of the aedeagus of
+
+G. curupira
+
+broader (in lateral view) than the apical part of the median lobe of
+
+G. opacum
+
+. The median lobe of
+
+G. curupira
+
+has sensilla; sensilla are absent in
+
+G. opacum
+
+. The paremeres of the aedeagus of
+
+G. curupira
+
+are strongly curved in lateral view and without sensilla; the parameres are straight and has two sensilla at the base in
+
+G. opacum
+
+.
+
+
+
+FIGURE 1.
+
+Glyptoma curupira
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+Holotype
+(C),
+Paratype
+(A, C)
+;
+A
+. Head, Pronotum and Elytra;
+B.
+Antenna;
+C.
+Aedeagus.
+
+
+
+Description.
+Holotype
+male, BL: 4.0 mm, FL:
+2.01 mm
+.
+
+Coloration: dark reddish brown (almost black); antennae dark reddish brown (almost black); legs light reddish brown.
+
+Head (
+Figure 1A
+) wider (HW: 0.64) than long (HL: 0.54); subrectangular; with rounded hind and anterior angles; large eyes slightly prominent and longer than temples; sides in front of eyes parallel up to base of antennae; at base of antennae with almost rectangular angle; anterior edge of clypeus as wide as half of width between base of antennae. Head with large, dense and deep setiferous punctures; with some coalescent punctures without evident ridges; each puncture with a yellow seta; interstices between punctures 1/2 to 1/5 as wide as diameter of punctures. Integument of epicranium, including surface of punctures, covered by dense microsculpturing formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures, appearing matt. Punctures on clypeus smaller and sparser than on vertex, surface matt. Neck appearing matt due to dense microsculpturing formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures; microsculpture on neck larger than microsculpture on head, pronotum, elytra, and abdomen. Antenna (
+Figure 1B
+) slightly longer than head, pronotum and half of elytra together; antennomeres 2–10 gradually and smoothly widening anteriorly; antennomere 1 subrectangular, long and thick; antennomere 2 narrower (0.8) and shorter (0.45) than antennomere 1; antennomeres 3–4 wider than long, wider than antennomere 2 and narrower than antennomere 1; antennomeres 2–10 slightly wider than long; antennomere 11 narrower and longer than antennomere 10; all antennomeres with numerous long yellow setae; setae slightly shorter (0.9) as width of antennomeres.
+
+
+Pronotum (
+Figure 1A
+) quadrate (PL: 0.60; PW: 0.60); widest at anterior third; anterior lateral margins convergent to widely rounded anterior angles in smooth convex curve; posterior lateral margins convergent to obtuse posterior angles in smooth concave curve; anterior margin straight. Pronotum with large, dense and deep setiferous punctures; some coalescent punctures without evident ridges; each puncture with a yellow seta; punctures as dense and deep as punctures on head; interstices between punctures 1/2 to 1/5 as wide as diameter of punctures. Median carina in wide depression; carina well developed for most of length, absent or weak anteriorly. Integument of pronotum, including surface of punctures, with similar dense microsculpturing formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures as head, appearing matt.
+
+
+Elytra (
+Figure 1A
+) wider than pronotum, longer than wide (EL: 0.87; EW: 0.82); sides slightly convex; widest at middle; shoulders well developed, smoothly curved and shortly denticulate; posterior angles rounded; humeral angles of elytra strongly extended anteriorly. Elytra with large, dense and deep setiferous punctures; smaller punctures of elytra about equal to larger punctures on head and pronotum; punctures each with a yellow seta; setae in asymmetric position to center of punctures; interstices of punctures 1/2 to 1/4 as wide as diameter of punctures. Discal carina distinct; curved outward, following the lateral margin of elytra. Lateral carina indistinctly restricted shortly behind shoulders. Suture marked by line of small, shallow and coalescent punctures along entire length of elytra. Space between suture and discal carina with presence of three irregular and parallel rows of setiferous punctures along entire length of elytra; with some coalescent punctures without evident ridges. Laterally to discal carina another two irregular and parallel rows of setiferous punctures along entire length of elytra; submarginal surface with two rows of slightly smaller setiferous punctures. Integument of elytra, including carina and surface of punctures, with similar dense microsculpturing formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures as head and pronotum, appearing matt.
+
+
+Legs (
+Figure 1A
+) almost completely covered with short yellow setae; surface appearing matt, with microridges organized with cells.
+
+Abdomen with dense and large setiferous punctures; each puncture carrying yellow seta; punctures becoming less deep from segments 3 to 8; punctures on segments 7 and 8 much less deep. Interstices between punctures in segment 3 similar to head, pronotum and elytra; interstices between punctures becoming larger from segments 3 to 8. Surface of abdomen with similar dense microsculpturing formed by uniformly distributed micropunctures as head, pronotum and elytra, appearing matt.
+
+Aedeagus as in
+Figure 1C
+. In lateral view, paramere small and strongly curved, with its apex reaching half of median lobe; with short acute apex and without sensilla. Median lobe in lateral view curved, bulbous at base, apical region distinctly bigger than middle region; apex with small pointed to parameral side and with numerous sensilla in apical 2/3 region.
+
+Female similar to male.
+
+Variation. Total length
+3.7 to 4 mm
+. Coloration, punctures pattern on the head, pronotum and elytra, and shapes of the antennomeres were consistent among the specimens examined.
+
+
+Habitat. Captured manually under bark in decaying trunks and branches. The capture sites are destined for selective logging and the vegetation is second-growth Evergreen Tropical Forest “Floresta Ombrófila Densa de Terras Baixas” (
+
+Veloso
+et al
+. 1991
+
+).
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+G. curupira
+
+
+sp. nov.
+
+is know from the municipalities of Itacoatiara and Itapiranga in Amazonas State,
+Brazil
+.
+
+
+Etymology. The specific epithet name is a noun in apposition and refers to a figure from Brazilian folklore (Curupira), of Amazonian origin, characterized as an entity that protects the forests. In a local legend (see
+Chaves 2021
+), at the exact point where the
+holotype
+of the species was collected, workers from a logging company reported having been terrorized by this folkloric figure after a day of work in the forest.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file