diff --git a/data/38/D1/A9/38D1A99ED75D55DBB83B536A961B62DD.xml b/data/38/D1/A9/38D1A99ED75D55DBB83B536A961B62DD.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c22a68796be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/38/D1/A9/38D1A99ED75D55DBB83B536A961B62DD.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
+
+
+
+Delimitation of the widely distributed Palearctic Stenodema species (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae): insights from molecular and morphological data
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Namyatova, Anna A.
+0000-0001-9678-3430
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Podbelskogo sh. 3, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196608, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Dzhelali, Polina A.
+0000-0002-0741-3655
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Konstantinov, Fedor V.
+0000-0002-7013-5686
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-08-13
+
+
+1209
+
+
+245
+294
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1209.124766
+069B4575-16D4-4EC4-804D-AB4618C9AB43
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema holsata
+(Fabricius, 1787)
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1 D, F
+,
+2 H
+,
+3 D – F
+,
+4 B, D
+,
+5 I – L, S, T
+,
+11 H, I
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Cimex holsatus
+Fabricius, 1787: 306
+
+(original description).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema holsatum
+
+
+:
+
+Reuter 1904: 6
+
+(comb. nov., key to species);
+
+Carvalho 1959: 303
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1964: 958
+
+(key to species);
+
+Wagner and Weber 1964: 97
+
+(key to species);
+
+Wagner 1974: 114
+
+(key to species).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema holsata
+
+
+:
+
+Kerzhner 1988: 99
+
+(key to species);
+
+Muminov 1989: 128
+
+(key to species);
+
+Vinokurov and Kanyukova 1995: 99
+
+(key to species);
+
+Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 194
+
+(catalogue).
+
+2
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length in male 4.7–5.7, in female 5.5–6.4; hemelytron often with brown to dark brown stripe along inner margin; frons not protruding above clypeus base (as in Fig.
+1 H, I
+); body length / pronotum width in female 3.9–4.3; antennal segment I in male and female 0.9–1.0 × as long as head width; antennal segment I narrower than forefemur; antennal segment II narrower than hind tibia, 4.0–4.4 × as long as vertex width; setae on antennal segment I shorter than half of antennal segment I width; labium reaching hind coxa, but not surpassing it; hind femur only slightly tapering toward apex, without spines (Fig.
+2 H
+); hind tibia straight basally (as in Fig.
+2 J
+); swelling above propleural suture curved (as in Fig.
+1 H
+); groove on posterior part of mesopleuron absent (as in Fig.
+1 M
+); paired pits on pronotum between calli present, slit-like (Fig.
+1 F
+); setae on posterior margin of hind femur as dense as on other parts of femur, distinctly shorter than hind femur width (Fig.
+2 H
+); hind femur with distinct markings; genital capsule as wide as long, rounded apically and with swelling near apex, without outgrowths near paramere sockets (Fig.
+5 U
+); apical half of right paramere wider than basal part (Fig.
+5 M
+); left paramere with elongate thin apical process and with additional outgrowth apically, with sensory lobe swollen (Fig.
+5 N
+), apical process rounded apically in posterior view (Fig.
+5 P
+); vesica with four membranous lobes (Fig.
+3 D – F
+); dorsal labiate plate wider than long; sclerotized ring 2.5–3 × as wide as long; distance between sclerotized rings ~ 1.5 × longer than sclerotized ring width; membranous swelling at middle of dorsal labiate plate present, triangular (Fig.
+4 D
+); posterior wall with dorsal structure between interramal lobes (Fig.
+4 B
+).
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+
+Stenodema holsata
+
+has a trans-Palearctic distribution, spanning from southern and western Europe to the Russian Far East, and also known from Central Asia (
+Kerzhner and Josifov 1999
+).
+
+
+
+
+Notes.
+
+
+
+Stenodema algoviensis
+
+and
+
+S. holsata
+
+are two similar species.
+Wagner (1974)
+in the key to
+
+Stenodema
+species
+
+separated those two taxa by the antennal segment I length / head width ratio. However, we found that this ratio is only different in males (
+1.1 in
+
+S. algoviensis
+
+, 0.9–1.0 in
+
+S. holsata
+
+), which was also previously found by
+Tamanini (1982)
+. Additionally, males are different in the antennal segment II / vertex width ratio (5.0 in
+
+S. algoviensis
+
+, 4.0–
+4.4 in
+
+S. holsata
+
+). In terms of genital structure, these two species differ in the shape of the left paramere i. e.,
+
+S. holsata
+
+has an additional outgrowth near the apical process, whereas in
+
+S. algoviensis
+
+only a small swelling is present (
+Wagner 1974
+: figs 5 N, 90 E, F;
+Tamanini 1982
+: fig. 2 A, B, F, G). Vesica and female genitalia of
+
+S. algoviensis
+
+, as well as molecular data, were not studied.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/5B/68/6F/5B686FFC4F895E3CAC8453FADD6652C5.xml b/data/5B/68/6F/5B686FFC4F895E3CAC8453FADD6652C5.xml
index ec361943f49..e234e0cfda2 100644
--- a/data/5B/68/6F/5B686FFC4F895E3CAC8453FADD6652C5.xml
+++ b/data/5B/68/6F/5B686FFC4F895E3CAC8453FADD6652C5.xml
@@ -1,54 +1,54 @@
-
-
-
-Delimitation of the widely distributed Palearctic Stenodema species (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae): insights from molecular and morphological data
+
+
+
+Delimitation of the widely distributed Palearctic Stenodema species (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae): insights from molecular and morphological data
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Namyatova, Anna A.
-0000-0001-9678-3430
-Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Podbelskogo sh. 3, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196608, Russia
+Namyatova, Anna A.
+0000-0001-9678-3430
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Podbelskogo sh. 3, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196608, Russia
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Dzhelali, Polina A.
-0000-0002-0741-3655
-Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
+Dzhelali, Polina A.
+0000-0002-0741-3655
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
-
-
-Author
+
+
+Author
-Konstantinov, Fedor V.
-0000-0002-7013-5686
-Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
+Konstantinov, Fedor V.
+0000-0002-7013-5686
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
-text
-
-
-ZooKeys
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
-
-2024
-
-2024-08-13
+
+2024
+
+2024-08-13
-
-1209
+
+1209
-
-245
-294
+
+245
+294
-journal article
-10.3897/zookeys.1209.124766
-069B4575-16D4-4EC4-804D-AB4618C9AB43
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1209.124766
+069B4575-16D4-4EC4-804D-AB4618C9AB43
@@ -100,7 +100,6 @@
-Stenodema turanica
@@ -118,7 +117,6 @@
6
-
@@ -127,53 +125,62 @@
Type material examined.
-
+Lectotype
of
+Stenodema turanicumReuter, 1904
+
(designated here):
Turkmenistan
•
♂
-; Kopet Dagh;
+;
+Kopet Dagh
+;
38.06 ° N
,
57.37 ° E
; no date provided;
K. O. Ahnger
; (
-http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56573
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56573
+
); (
MZH
-).
+)
+.
-
+Paralectotypes
of
+Stenodema turanicumReuter, 1904
+
:
Kyrgyzstan
-
•
-2 ♀
;
-Chiburgan
-[Tschiburgan] valley;
+Chiburgan
+[
+Tschiburgan
+] valley;
39.60 ° N
,
@@ -182,9 +189,13 @@ of
; no date provided;
A. P. Fedchenko
; (
-http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56577
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56577
+
,
-http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56580
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56580
+
); (
MZH
@@ -192,7 +203,7 @@ of
)
•
-
+♀
;
Gulcha
@@ -205,20 +216,22 @@ of
; no date provided;
A. P. Fedchenko
; (
-http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56575
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56575
+
); (
MZH
-)
-Tajikistan
+)
+
+Tajikistan
: •
-♂
-Panjakent
-[Pendzhikent], valley of
-Zeravshan River
+Panjakent
+[Pendzhikent],
+valley of Zeravshan River
;
39.48 ° N
@@ -228,33 +241,38 @@ of
; no date provided;
A. P. Fedchenko
; (
-AMNH
-_
-PBI 00345037
+AMNH_PBI 00345037
,
-http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56652
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56652
+
)
; •
-
+2 ♀
; (
-AMNH
-_
-PBI 00345035
+AMNH_PBI 00345035
,
-http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56650
-; AMNH _ PBI 00345036,
-http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56651
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56650
+
+;
+AMNH_PBI 00345036
+,
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56651
+
); (
MZH
-).
-Turkmenistan
+)
+.
+
+Turkmenistan
: •
-♂
;
Kopet Dagh
@@ -267,16 +285,22 @@ _
; no date provided;
K. O. Ahnger
; (
-http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56579
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56579
+
)
; •
-
+2 ♀
(
-http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56578
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56578
+
,
-http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56572
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56572
+
); (
MZH
@@ -284,7 +308,7 @@ _
)
•
-
+♀Gokdepe
[Geok-tepe];
@@ -296,19 +320,22 @@ _
;
K. O. Ahnger
; (
-http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56574
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56574
+
); (
MZH
-).
-Uzbekistan
+)
+.
+
+Uzbekistan
: •
-♀
;
-Shohimardon
+Shohimardon
[Schagimardan];
39.99 ° N
@@ -318,7 +345,9 @@ _
; no date provided;
A. P. Fedchenko
; (
-http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56576
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56576
+
); (
MZH
diff --git a/data/6B/00/D0/6B00D00581E3576CA50D2AD109A8B2CB.xml b/data/6B/00/D0/6B00D00581E3576CA50D2AD109A8B2CB.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7fc35d1dabd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/6B/00/D0/6B00D00581E3576CA50D2AD109A8B2CB.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+
+
+
+Delimitation of the widely distributed Palearctic Stenodema species (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae): insights from molecular and morphological data
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Namyatova, Anna A.
+0000-0001-9678-3430
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Podbelskogo sh. 3, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196608, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Dzhelali, Polina A.
+0000-0002-0741-3655
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Konstantinov, Fedor V.
+0000-0002-7013-5686
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-08-13
+
+
+1209
+
+
+245
+294
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1209.124766
+069B4575-16D4-4EC4-804D-AB4618C9AB43
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema laevigata
+(Linnaeus, 1758)
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1 H, K, O
+,
+2 E
+,
+4 F, G
+,
+5 A – D, Q
+,
+7 A – C
+,
+9 G, H
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Cimex leavigatus
+Linnaeus, 1758: 449
+
+(original description).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema laevigatum
+
+
+:
+
+Reuter 1904: 6
+
+(comb. nov., key to species);
+
+Carvalho 1959: 304
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1964: 958
+
+(key to species);
+
+Wagner and Weber 1964: 95
+
+(key to species);
+
+Wagner 1974: 113
+
+(key to species).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema laevigata
+
+
+:
+
+Muminov 1989: 128
+
+(key to species);
+
+Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 195
+
+(catalogue).
+
+3
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length in male 5.9–6.7, in female 6.8–7.5. Frons not protruding above clypeus base (Fig.
+1 H
+); labium reaching metasternum, but not surpassing it (Fig.
+1 O
+); hind femur distinctly tapering towards apex, without spines (Fig.
+2 E
+); hind tibia curved basally (as in Fig.
+2 E
+); swelling above propleural suture curved (Fig.
+1 H
+); groove on posterior part of mesopleuron present, shallow (Fig.
+1 K
+); paired pits on pronotum between calli absent (as in Fig.
+1 G
+); setae on posterior margin of hind femur denser than on other parts of femur, distinctly shorter than hind femur width (Fig.
+2 E
+); genital capsule slightly longer than wide, acute apically, with outgrowth near each paramere socket (Fig.
+5 Q
+); apical half of right paramere as wide as basal half (Fig.
+5 A
+); apical process of right paramere more or less acute apically in posterior view but not elongate (Fig.
+5 D
+); sensory lobe of left paramere swollen (Fig.
+5 B
+); vesica with two membranous lobes (Fig.
+7 A – C
+); dorsal labiate plate as long as wide, sclerotized ring 2–2.5 × as long as wide; distance between sclerotized rings ~ 0.5–0.75 × as long as sclerotized ring width; membranous swelling on dorsal labiate plate present, rounded, not reaching sclerotized ring (Fig.
+4 F
+); posterior wall with dorsal structure between interramal lobes (Fig.
+5 G
+).
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+
+Stenodema laevigata
+
+is mostly known from Western Palearctic, and there are no records from Siberia. However, the species was recorded from
+Kyrgyzstan
+and
+China
+(
+Kerzhner and Josifov 1999
+).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/8C/51/52/8C5152D7023D578A80D9CFF0729FA029.xml b/data/8C/51/52/8C5152D7023D578A80D9CFF0729FA029.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..05a9a87bfb8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/8C/51/52/8C5152D7023D578A80D9CFF0729FA029.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,335 @@
+
+
+
+Delimitation of the widely distributed Palearctic Stenodema species (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae): insights from molecular and morphological data
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Namyatova, Anna A.
+0000-0001-9678-3430
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Podbelskogo sh. 3, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196608, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Dzhelali, Polina A.
+0000-0002-0741-3655
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Konstantinov, Fedor V.
+0000-0002-7013-5686
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-08-13
+
+
+1209
+
+
+245
+294
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1209.124766
+069B4575-16D4-4EC4-804D-AB4618C9AB43
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema sibirica
+Bergroth, 1914
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1 M
+,
+2 F
+,
+6 E – H, I, U
+,
+10 B, F
+,
+12 E – G
+,
+13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Miris virens lateralis
+Sahlberg, 1873: 23
+
+(original description).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema lateralis
+
+
+:
+
+Reuter 1891: 187
+
+(comb. nov.).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema sibiricum
+
+Bergroth, 1914: 183 (new name for junior secondary homonym of
+
+Stenodema lateralis
+(Geoffroy, 1785 ))
+
+;
+
+Carvalho 1959: 306
+
+(catalogue).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema sibirica
+
+
+;
+
+Kerzhner 1988: 99
+
+(key to species);
+
+Muminov 1989: 127
+
+(key to species);
+
+Vinokurov and Kanyukova 1995: 98
+
+(key to species);
+
+Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 196
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Yasunaga 2019: 301
+
+(key to species).
+
+5
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type material examined.
+
+
+
+
+Lectotype
+
+of
+
+
+Miris virens lateralis
+Sahlberg, 1873
+
+
+:
+Russia
+•
+♀
+;
+Krasnoyarsk Terr.
+,
+Yeniseysk
+[Jeniseisk];
+
+58.45 ° N
+,
+92.18 ° E
+
+; no date provided;
+J. Sahlberg
+; (
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56515
+
+); (
+
+MZH
+
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length in male 5.8–6.5, in female 6.2–6.8; frons protruding above clypeus base (as in Fig.
+1 H, I
+); setae on hemelytron simple; hemelytron brown to dark brown medially and yellow to pale brown along outer margin (Fig.
+12 E – G
+); male vertex width / eye ratio 2.1–2.4; labium reaching mesocoxa but not surpassing it (as in Fig.
+1 N
+); hind femur only slightly tapering towards apex, without spines; setae on posterior margin of hind femur as dense as on other parts of femur, shorter than half of hind femur (Fig.
+2 F
+); hind tibia not curved basally (as in Fig.
+2 J
+); swelling on propleura curved (Fig.
+1 H
+); antennal segment I length / head width ratio in male 1.0, in female 0.9–1.0; antennal segment I / pronotum lengths ratio
+0.8–0.9 in
+male,
+0.8 in
+female; antennal segment I as wide as or slightly narrower than eye diameter; groove on posterior part of mesopleuron absent (Fig.
+1 M
+); paired pits between calli absent (as in Fig.
+1 G
+), setae on antennal segment I shorter than antennal segment I width; genital capsule ~ 1.5 × as long as wide, more or less acute apically, with outgrowth near left paramere socket (Fig.
+6 T, U
+); right paramere ca 3 × as long as wide, its apical part slightly wider than basal part, its apical process bifurcate, ca 0.1 × as long as rest of paramere (Fig.
+6 E, I
+); left paramere with apical process acute at posterior view (Fig.
+6 K, P
+), its sensory lobe swollen (Fig.
+6 J, M
+); vesica with one large and two small membranous lobes (Fig.
+13
+); dorsal labiate plate slightly longer than wide; sclerotized ring ~ 3 × as wide as long; distance between sclerotized rings ~ 0.3–0.5 × as long as sclerotized ring width (Fig.
+10 B
+); posterior wall with sigmoid process between interramal lobes (Fig.
+10 F
+).
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+
+Stenodema sibirica
+
+is known from Siberia, northern
+China
+,
+Mongolia
+, the Russian Far East, and
+Korea
+(
+Kerzhner and Josifov 1999
+).
+
+
+
+
+Notes.
+
+
+Among the material preserved at
+ZISP
+, we found specimens with
+two types
+of vesica. They differ in the shape of the membranous lobes and the length of the ridge with sclerotized teeth (cf. Fig.
+13 A – C
+and Fig.
+13 D – F
+). The genital capsule and parameres of specimens with these
+two types
+of vesica were very similar (cf. Fig.
+6 E – H, U
+and Fig.
+6 I – L, T
+). We found only
+two males
+with the short, sclerotized ridge, and there were no females from the same series. There were no differences in the habitus between the specimens with
+two types
+of male genitalia. The
+lectotype
+preserved at the Finnish Museum of Natural History is a female, and we refrained from dissecting its genitalia, as it will not provide us with additional information on the issue. Therefore, we treat widespread form as
+
+S. sibirica
+
+and refrain from making any taxonomic decisions on the
+two specimens
+with another type of vesica, as the corresponding species may have been already described from
+China
+(see below for comparisons).
+
+
+
+Stenodema sibirica
+
+is very similar to
+
+S. rubrinervis
+Horváth, 1905
+
+. They have minor differences in the measurements i. e., vertex width / eye diameter ratio in male (
+2.1–2.4 in
+
+S. sibirica
+
+and 1.7–2.0 in
+
+S. rubrinervis
+
+) and length of antennal segment I (
+1.8–2.1 in
+
+S. sibirica
+
+and 2.5–3.0 in
+
+S. rubrinervis
+
+) (Table
+1
+). The genitalia of those two species are very similar, and vesica of
+
+S. rubrinervis
+
+also has a long ridge of sclerotized teeth (
+Yasunaga 2019
+: fig. 8 C).
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/F0/3A/63/F03A63151EBE5BD0AD9F2283DEBBE124.xml b/data/F0/3A/63/F03A63151EBE5BD0AD9F2283DEBBE124.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c6f1b003348
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/F0/3A/63/F03A63151EBE5BD0AD9F2283DEBBE124.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,455 @@
+
+
+
+Delimitation of the widely distributed Palearctic Stenodema species (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae): insights from molecular and morphological data
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Namyatova, Anna A.
+0000-0001-9678-3430
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Podbelskogo sh. 3, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196608, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Dzhelali, Polina A.
+0000-0002-0741-3655
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Konstantinov, Fedor V.
+0000-0002-7013-5686
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-08-13
+
+
+1209
+
+
+245
+294
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1209.124766
+069B4575-16D4-4EC4-804D-AB4618C9AB43
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema virens
+(Linnaeus, 1767)
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1 J, P
+,
+2 B
+,
+5 E – H, R, V
+,
+7 G – I
+,
+10 C, D
+,
+11 E – G
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Cimex virens
+Linnaeus, 1767: 730
+
+(original description).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema virens
+
+Reuter, 1904: 4
+(comb. nov., key to species);
+
+Carvalho 1959: 307
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1964: 958
+
+(key to species);
+
+Wagner and Weber 1964: 94
+
+(key to species);
+
+Wagner 1974: 112
+
+(key to species);
+
+Muminov 1989: 127
+
+(key to species);
+
+Vinokurov and Kanyukova 1995: 98
+
+(key to species);
+
+Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 196
+
+(catalogue).
+
+7
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length in male 6.0–6.6, in female 6.1–7.1; frons protruding above clypeus base (as in Fig.
+1 C
+); labium reaching middle coxa, but not surpassing it (as in Fig.
+1 N
+); hind femur distinctly tapering towards apex, without spines (Fig.
+2 B
+), 6–8 × as long as wide; hind tibia curved basally (as in Fig.
+2 I
+); swelling on propleura curved (as in Fig.
+1 H
+); antennal segment I length / head width ratio in male 1.0, in female 0.8–1.0; antennal segment I / pronotum length ratio
+0.6–0.7 in
+male,
+0.6–0.8 in
+female; antennal segment I not widened basally, its setae at base as dense as on other parts of this segment; setae in antennal segment I simple; antennal segment II length / head width ratio in male 2.4–2.6; groove on posterior part of mesopleuron absent (as in Fig.
+1 M
+); paired pits between calli absent (as in Fig.
+1 G
+); setae on posterior margin of hind femur denser than on other parts of femur, shorter than half of hind femur width (Fig.
+2 B
+); genital capsule only slightly longer than wide, acute apically, with outgrowth near left paramere socket (Fig.
+5 R
+); right paramere ~ 4 × as long as wide, its apical part as wide as basal part, apical process bifurcate (Fig.
+5 E, G
+); right paramere with apical process acute in posterior view (Fig. 5 Р), its sensory lobe swollen (Fig.
+5 F
+); vesica with four membranous lobes (Fig.
+7 G – I
+); membranous swelling on dorsal labiate plate not covering sclerotized rings (Fig.
+10 C
+); posterior wall with dorsal structure and sigmoid process between interramal lobes, dorsal structure rounded (Fig.
+10 D
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Digital images of habitus.
+
+S. pilosa
+
+. specimens previously identified as
+
+S. trispinosa
+
+A
+♂ ZISP _ ENT 00004882
+B
+♀ ZISP _ ENT 00004886
+C
+Lectotype of
+
+Brachytropis pilosa
+
+D
+labels attached to the lectotype.
+
+S. calcarata
+
+E
+♂ ZISP _ ENT 00004876
+F
+♀ ZISP _ ENT 00004864.
+
+S. laevigata
+
+G
+♂ ZISP _ ENT 00004921
+H
+♀ ZISP _ ENT 00004923.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Female genitalia.
+
+S. turanica
+
+. ZISP _ ENT 00002735
+A
+dorsal labiate plate
+E
+posterior wall of bursa copulatrix.
+
+S. sibirica
+
+. ZISP _ ENT 00003679
+B
+posterior wall of bursa copulatrix
+F
+dorsal labiate plate.
+
+S. virens
+ZISP
+
+_ ENT 00002732
+C
+posterior wall of bursa copulatrix
+D
+dorsal labiate plate.
+
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+
+Stenodema virens
+
+is widely distributed in Europe, the Near East, and the Caucasus, extending eastwards to Yakutia, Buryatia,
+Mongolia
+, and northern
+China
+(
+Kerzhner and Josifov 1999
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Digital images of habitus.
+
+S. turanica
+
+A
+♂ ZISP _ ENT 00004938
+B
+♂ ZISP _ ENT 00004937
+C
+♀. ZISP _ ENT 00004935
+D
+♀. ZISP _ ENT 00004953.
+
+S. virens
+
+E
+♂ ZISP _ ENT 00004898
+F
+♂ ZISP _ ENT 00004897
+G
+♀. ZISP _ ENT 00004894.
+
+S. holsata
+
+H
+♂ ZISP _ ENT 00004903
+I
+♀ ZISP _ ENT 00004907.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Digital images of habitus.
+
+S. algoviensis
+
+A
+♂ ZISP _ ENT 00004951
+B
+♀ ZISP _ ENT 00004950.
+
+S. rubrinervis
+
+C
+♂ ZISP _ ENT 00004941
+D
+♀ ZISP _ ENT 00004960.
+
+S. sibirica
+
+E
+♂ ZISP _ ENT 00004919
+F
+♀ ZISP _ ENT 00004928
+G
+♀ ZISP _ ENT 00004929.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Inflated vesica.
+
+S. sibirica
+
+vesica with long ridge ZISP _ ENT 00003617
+A
+dorsal view
+B
+left lateral view
+C
+ventral lateral view; vesica with short ridge ZISP _ ENT 00003620
+D
+dorsal view
+E
+left lateral view
+F
+ventral lateral view.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Phylogeny obtained using the Bayesian inference based on the
+COI
+dataset, part 1. The supports are provided above the branches. The numbers on the left correspond to
+PP
+, the numbers on the right correspond to
+BS
+obtained with RAxML. The color stripes correspond to the results of the species delimitation analyses in the following order:
+ABGD
+, GMYC, bPTP,
+PTP
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Phylogeny obtained using the Bayesian inference based on the
+COI
+dataset, part 2. The supports are provided above the branches. The numbers on the left correspond to
+PP
+, the numbers on the right correspond to
+BS
+obtained with RAxML. The color stripes correspond to the results of the species delimitation analyses in the following order:
+ABGD
+, GMYC, bPTP,
+PTP
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Phylogeny obtained using the Bayesian inference based on the full dataset dataset, part 1. The supports are provided above the branches. The numbers on the left correspond to
+PP
+, the numbers on the right correspond to
+BS
+obtained with RAxML. The color stripes correspond to the results of the species delimitation analyses in the following order:
+BPP
+, GMYC, bPTP,
+PTP
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Phylogeny obtained using the Bayesian inference based on the full dataset, part 2. The supports are provided above the branches. The numbers on the left correspond to
+PP
+, the numbers on the right correspond to
+BS
+obtained with RAxML. The color stripes correspond to the results of the species delimitation analyses in the following order:
+BPP
+, GMYC, bPTP,
+PTP
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Phylogeny obtained using the Bayesian inference based on the reduced dataset. The supports are provided above the branches. The numbers on the left correspond to
+PP
+, the numbers on the right correspond to
+BS
+obtained with RAxML. The color stripes correspond to the results of the species delimitation analyses in the following order:
+BPP
+, GMYC, bPTP,
+PTP
+.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Phylogeny obtained using the Bayesian inference based on the 16 S rRNA dataset. The supports are provided above the branches. The numbers on the left correspond to
+PP
+, the number on the right correspond to
+BS
+obtained with RAxML. The color stripes correspond to the results of the species delimitation analyses in the following order:
+ABGD
+, GMYC, bPTP,
+PTP
+.
+
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/data/F1/68/32/F168326214FF59D38C03C92125F9C299.xml b/data/F1/68/32/F168326214FF59D38C03C92125F9C299.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2376303c397
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/F1/68/32/F168326214FF59D38C03C92125F9C299.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,722 @@
+
+
+
+Delimitation of the widely distributed Palearctic Stenodema species (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae): insights from molecular and morphological data
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Namyatova, Anna A.
+0000-0001-9678-3430
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Podbelskogo sh. 3, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, 196608, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Dzhelali, Polina A.
+0000-0002-0741-3655
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
+
+
+
+Author
+
+Konstantinov, Fedor V.
+0000-0002-7013-5686
+Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia & National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
+
+text
+
+
+ZooKeys
+
+
+2024
+
+2024-08-13
+
+
+1209
+
+
+245
+294
+
+
+
+journal article
+10.3897/zookeys.1209.124766
+069B4575-16D4-4EC4-804D-AB4618C9AB43
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema pilosa
+(
+Jakovlev, 1889
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+Figs 1 A, G, Q
+,
+2 D
+,
+3 G – I
+,
+4 E, H
+,
+6 N – P, R, S
+,
+9 A – D
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Brachytropis pilosa
+
+Jakovlev, 1889: 243
+(original description).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema pilosum
+
+
+:
+
+Reuter 1904: 3
+
+(comb. nov., key to species).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema pilosa
+
+
+:
+
+Muminov 1989: 127
+
+(key to species).
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema trispinosum
+
+Reuter, 1904: 8
+(original description);
+
+Carvalho 1959: 301
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Wagner and Weber 1964: 93
+
+(key to species);
+
+Kerzhner and Jaczewski 1964: 958
+
+(key to species);
+
+Wagner 1974: 110
+
+(key to species). New synonym.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Stenodema trispinosa
+
+
+:
+
+Kerzhner 1988: 99
+
+(key to species);
+
+Muminov 1989: 126
+
+(key to species);
+
+Vinokurov and Kanyukova 1995: 98
+
+(key to species);
+
+Kerzhner and Josifov 1999: 191
+
+(catalogue);
+
+Yasunaga 2019: 301
+
+(key to species).
+
+4
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Type material examined.
+
+
+
+
+Lectotype
+
+of
+
+
+Brachytropis pilosa
+Jakovlev, 1889
+
+
+:
+China
+•
+♀
+;
+Xinjang
+:
+Quiemo
+[oasis
+Tschertschen
+];
+
+38.14 ° N
+,
+85.53 ° E
+
+;
+
+11 Jun 1885
+
+;
+NM Przhevalsky
+; (
+ZISP_ENT 00015588
+); (
+
+ZISP
+
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Lectotype
+
+of
+
+
+Stenodema trispinosum
+Reuter, 1904
+
+
+:
+Russia
+: •
+♀
+;
+Yakutia Rep.
+,
+Batylim
+,
+Lena River
+;
+
+62.02 ° N
+,
+129.73 ° E
+
+;
+
+18–19 Jul 1901
+
+;
+B. Poppius
+; (
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56520
+
+); (
+
+MZH
+
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Paralectotypes
+
+of
+
+
+Stenodema trispinosum
+Reuter, 1904
+
+
+:
+Russia
+•
+♀
+;
+Arkhangelsk Prov.
+:
+Solovetsky Islands
+;
+
+65.08 ° N
+,
+35.88 ° E
+
+; no date provided;
+Levander
+; (
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.25545
+
+); (
+
+MZH
+
+)
+
+•
+
+3 ♀
+;
+Buryatia Rep.
+:
+Dauria
+;
+
+53 ° N
+,
+115 ° E
+
+; 1842;
+R. F. Sahlberg
+; (
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56517
+
+,
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56518
+
+,
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56519
+
+); (
+
+MZH
+
+)
+
+•
+
+♀
+;
+Khakassia Rep.
+:
+Sayanogorsk
+[Osnatjennaja];
+
+53.09 ° N
+,
+91.40 ° E
+
+; 1885;
+R. E. Hammarström
+; (
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56523
+
+); (
+
+MZH
+
+)
+
+•
+
+♀
+;
+Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug
+:
+Leushi
+[Leusch];
+
+56.62 ° N
+,
+65.72 ° E
+
+; no date provided;
+N. Sundman
+; (
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56516
+
+); (
+
+MZH
+
+)
+
+•
+
+♀
+;
+Yakutia Rep.
+:
+Olekminsk
+;
+
+60.37 ° N
+,
+120.43 ° E
+
+; 1901;
+B. Poppius
+; (
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56521
+
+); (
+
+MZH
+
+)
+
+•
+
+♀
+;
+Ust-Aldan
+
+63.52 ° N
+,
+129.41 ° E
+
+;
+
+13 Jul 1901
+
+;
+B. Poppius
+; (
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56524
+
+); (
+
+MZH
+
+)
+
+•
+
+♀
+;
+Yakutsk
+,
+
+62.03 ° N
+,
+129.73 ° E
+
+; 1901;
+B. Poppius
+; (
+
+http://id.luomus.fi/GZ.56522
+
+); (
+
+MZH
+
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
+Diagnosis.
+
+
+Body length in male 5.4–6.4, in female 6.0–6.3; frons not protruding above clypeus base (as in Fig. I); labium reaching middle coxa but not surpassing it; hind femur only slightly tapering toward apex, with three spines ventroapically; setae on posterior margin of hind femur as dense as on other parts of femur, distinctly shorter than hind femur width (Fig.
+2 D
+); hind tibia straight basally (as in Fig.
+2 G
+); swelling above propleura suture straight (as in Fig.
+1 I
+); groove on posterior part of mesopleuron absent (as in Fig.
+1 M
+); paired pits between calli small, not discernible from punctures or absent (Fig.
+1 G
+); genital capsule slightly longer than wide; apex of genital capsule acute and curved left; left paramere socket with outgrowth (Fig.
+6 S
+); apical half of right paramere as wide as basal half, not bifurcate apically (Fig.
+6 N, O
+); left paramere with apical process acute and elongate in posterior view (Fig.
+6 P
+) and with swollen sensory lobe (Fig.
+6 M
+); vesica with two membranous lobes (Fig.
+3 G – I
+); dorsal labiate plate ~ 1.5 × as long as wide; sclerotized ring ~ 1.5 × as wide as long; distance between sclerotized rings ~ 0.3–0.4 × as long as sclerotized ring width; membranous swelling on dorsal labiate plate absent (Fig.
+4 H
+); posterior wall without dorsal structure between interramal lobes (Fig.
+4 E
+).
+
+
+
+
+
+Distribution.
+
+
+In its currently accepted concept,
+
+S. pilosa
+
+is a Holarctic species with a wide circumpolar distribution. It extends south to California, New Mexico, Texas, and Georgia in the Nearctic, and to
+France
+,
+Romania
+,
+Turkey
+, Transcaucasia, Central Asia, Central
+China
+, and
+Korea
+in the Palearctic (
+Wheeler and Henry 1992
+;
+Kerzhner and Josifov 1999
+). Based on the distribution pattern,
+
+S. trispinosa
+
+, here synonymized with
+
+S. pilosa
+
+, is considered a true Holarctic species, with possible post-Pleistocene expansion from the Beringia refugium (
+
+Lattin and
+Oman
+1983
+
+;
+Wheeler and Henry 1992
+).
+
+
+
+
+Notes.
+
+
+
+Stenodema pilosa
+
+was initially described within the genus
+
+Brachytropis
+Fieber, 1858
+
+(
+Jakovlev 1889
+), an unnecessary new name for
+
+Brachystira
+Fieber, 1858
+
+, currently recognized as a subgenus of
+
+Stenodema
+(
+Reuter 1904
+)
+
+. In the original description
+Jakovlev (1889)
+mentioned that this species had two spines on the hind femur.
+Reuter (1904)
+described
+
+Stenodema trispinosa
+
+as a distinctive species with three spines on the hind femur. He included
+
+S. pilosa
+
+in his key to species based solely on the original description, noting that he had not personally examined specimens of this species.
+Muminov (1989)
+designated the
+lectotype
+of
+
+B. pilosa
+
+and mentioned that it had three spines on the hind femur, and that
+
+S. pilosa
+
+and
+
+S. trispinosa
+
+did not have any differences in the male genitalia structures. He hypothesized that
+Jakovlev (1889)
+indicated the presence of two spines on the hind femur in
+
+B. pilosa
+
+due to the relatively small size of the basal one. However, he followed Reuter’s key in other respects and differentiated these two species by the length of antennal segment I, although exact measurements or ratios were not provided, and by the length of setae on this segment and hind tibiae.
+
+
+We examined the
+lectotypes
+of both species as well as other specimens authentically identified as
+
+S. pilosa
+
+, and did not find any characters separating this species from
+
+S. trispinosa
+
+. Most probably,
+
+S. trispinosa
+
+was treated as a separate new species by
+Reuter (1904)
+, because of the mistake in the description of
+
+S. pilosa
+
+. According to our measurements,
+
+S. pilosa
+
+and
+
+S. trispinosa
+
+do not differ in the antennal segment II length and we could not find any differences in the setae on the hind tibia. We fully concur with
+Muminov (1989)
+regarding the lack of differences in the male genitalia structure, and we were unable to identify any distinctions in the female genitalia either. Therefore, we synonymize
+
+S. trispinosa
+Reuter, 1904
+
+with
+
+S. pilosa
+(
+Jakovlev, 1889
+)
+
+.
+
+
+
+
\ No newline at end of file