treatments-rdf/data/03/AA/87/03AA87B99E0AFFA7FF1AC22DFD51F9BC.ttl

110 lines
7.8 KiB
Turtle
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix bibo: <http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/> .
@prefix cito: <http://purl.org/spar/cito/> .
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/> .
@prefix dwc: <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/> .
@prefix dwcFP: <http://filteredpush.org/ontologies/oa/dwcFP#> .
@prefix fabio: <http://purl.org/spar/fabio/> .
@prefix trt: <http://plazi.org/vocab/treatment#> .
@prefix xlink: <http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/> .
<http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AA87B99E0AFFA7FF1AC22DFD51F9BC>
cito:cites <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287990>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287991>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287992>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287993>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287994>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287995>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287996>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287997> ;
dc:creator "Kury, Adriano B." ;
dc:title "Laniatores" ;
trt:publishedIn <http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3925.3.1> ;
trt:treatsTaxonName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Laniatores> ;
a trt:Treatment .
<http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3925.3.1>
bibo:endPage "340" ;
bibo:issue "3" ;
bibo:journal "Zootaxa" ;
bibo:startPage "301" ;
bibo:volume "3925" ;
dc:creator "Kury, Adriano B." ;
dc:date "2015" ;
dc:title "Opiliones are no longer the same — on suprafamilial groups in harvestmen (Arthropoda: Arachnida)" ;
fabio:hasPart <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287990>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287991>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287992>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287993>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287994>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287995>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287996>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287997> ;
a fabio:JournalArticle .
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Laniatores>
dwc:class "Arachnida" ;
dwc:kingdom "Animalia" ;
dwc:order "Opiliones" ;
dwc:phylum "Arthropoda" ;
dwc:rank "subOrder" ;
dwc:subOrder "Laniatores" ;
trt:hasParentName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Opiliones> ;
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Opiliones>
dwc:class "Arachnida" ;
dwc:kingdom "Animalia" ;
dwc:order "Opiliones" ;
dwc:phylum "Arthropoda" ;
dwc:rank "order" ;
trt:hasParentName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Arachnida> ;
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Arachnida>
dwc:class "Arachnida" ;
dwc:kingdom "Animalia" ;
dwc:phylum "Arthropoda" ;
dwc:rank "class" ;
trt:hasParentName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Arthropoda> ;
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Arthropoda>
dwc:kingdom "Animalia" ;
dwc:phylum "Arthropoda" ;
dwc:rank "phylum" ;
trt:hasParentName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia> ;
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia>
dwc:kingdom "Animalia" ;
dwc:rank "kingdom" ;
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287990>
dc:description "FIGURE 12. Hypothesis L 1 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Simon 1879). The lineages which would cause greater disturbance in the future were still dormant inside the Phalangodidae. Karsch (1880) and Sørensen (1886) kept basically the same pattern." ;
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287990/files/figure.png> ;
a fabio:Figure .
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287991>
dc:description "FIGURE 13. Hypothesis L 2 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1901; 1902). This author proposed a sharp separation between the Triaenonychidae (which he called Insidiatores, here represented by Equitius) against all other Laniatores (which he called simply Laniatores [sensu stricto] and here called Lomaniatores). Pocock (1902) followed this hypothesis of phylogeny. The term Insidiatores was later reused in a broader sense." ;
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287991/files/figure.png> ;
a fabio:Figure .
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287992>
dc:description "FIGURE 14. Hypothesis L 3 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Loman 1903). Only two years after creating the Insidiatores, Loman (1903) separated the Oncopodidae (which he called Sterrhonoti, here represented by Gnomulus) against the other Laniatores sensu stricto, called Camptonoti. This hypothesis lost support with the removal of the Cladonychiidae (here represented by Erebomaster) from the Phalangodidae by Briggs (1969)." ;
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287992/files/figure.png> ;
a fabio:Figure .
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287993>
dc:description "FIGURE 15. Hypothesis L 4 of phylogeny of the Laniatores Kratochvíl (1958). After the work of Forster (1954), who created the Synthetonychiidae, this family went straight into the vicinity of the Triaenonychidae in the views of all most authors. Kratochvíl proposed a symmetrical arrangement of the groups we now know as Insidiatores versus Grassatores (then respectively called Travunioidea and Oncopodoidea). The morphological cladistic analysis by Martens (1980) recovered this arrangement, as well as both combined analyses by Giribet et al. (1999; 2002). Kury in his catalogue (2003) resurrected and expanded the original concept of Lomans Insidiatores, using this name for the same clade recognized by Kratochvíl as Travunioidea." ;
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287993/files/figure.png> ;
a fabio:Figure .
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287994>
dc:description "FIGURE 16. Hypothesis L 5 of phylogeny of the Laniatores Šilhavý (1961). Šilhavý recognized the Travunioidea of Kratochvíl (here marked as “ Insidiatores ”, in blue) and made a change contraposing Oncopodidae against all other Laniatores, which has been anticipated by Mello-Leitão (1944), who had produced a surprisingly similar phylogeny (the famous cactus). This arrangement was conserved by Bristowe (1976)." ;
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287994/files/figure.png> ;
a fabio:Figure .
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287995>
dc:description "FIGURE 17. Hypothesis L 6 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Shultz 1998). Shultz morphological analysis (1998) and Shultz & Regier molecular analysis (2001) made a scarce sample of the Laniatores. The Insidiatores were dismantled, but the position of Synthetonychia was not made explicit, by not having been used in the analyses. The proximity of the Travuniidae with the Grassatores resembled Lomans view of the Laniatores." ;
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287995/files/figure.png> ;
a fabio:Figure .
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287996>
dc:description "FIGURE 18. Hypothesis L 7 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Kury 2002). A series of morphological studies—Kury (2002, morph), Giribet & Kury (2007, morph) and Mendes (2009, morph) — also favored the dismantlement of the Insidiatores, but joining the Triaenonychidae with the Grassatores. The new name Tricospilata is here proposed for this clade." ;
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287996/files/figure.png> ;
a fabio:Figure .
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287997>
dc:description "FIGURE 19. Hypothesis L 8 of phylogeny of the Laniatores (Giribet et al. 2010, mol). Grassatores remained firm, and the Insidiatores were dismantled, but in a novel way: the Synthetonychiidae were for the first time considered sister group to the other Laniatores. This result has been repeated by Sharma & Giribet (2011, mol). The new name Eulaniatores is proposed here to identify this clade, frontally conflicting with the Tricospilata concept illustrated in Fig. 18." ;
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287997/files/figure.png> ;
a fabio:Figure .