108 lines
8.9 KiB
Turtle
108 lines
8.9 KiB
Turtle
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
|
||
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
|
||
@prefix bibo: <http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/> .
|
||
@prefix cito: <http://purl.org/spar/cito/> .
|
||
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/> .
|
||
@prefix dwc: <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/> .
|
||
@prefix dwcFP: <http://filteredpush.org/ontologies/oa/dwcFP#> .
|
||
@prefix fabio: <http://purl.org/spar/fabio/> .
|
||
@prefix trt: <http://plazi.org/vocab/treatment#> .
|
||
|
||
<http://treatment.plazi.org/id/039D879EF13DFF85FCB5B17B44AEF9DF>
|
||
cito:cites <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924791>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924793>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924795>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924797>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924789> ;
|
||
dc:creator "Jasinski, Steven E." ;
|
||
dc:title "Chrysemys" ;
|
||
trt:augmentsTaxonConcept <http://taxon-concept.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Chrysemys_Gray_1844> ;
|
||
trt:publishedIn <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac084> ;
|
||
a trt:Treatment .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac084>
|
||
bibo:endPage "183" ;
|
||
bibo:journal "Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society" ;
|
||
bibo:pubDate "2022-11-30" ;
|
||
bibo:startPage "149" ;
|
||
bibo:volume "198" ;
|
||
dc:creator "Jasinski, Steven E." ;
|
||
dc:date "2023" ;
|
||
dc:title "A new species of Chrysemys (Emydidae: Deirochelyinae) from the latest Miocene-Early Pliocene of Tennessee, USA and its implications for the evolution of painted turtles" ;
|
||
fabio:hasPart <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924791>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924793>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924795>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924797>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924789> ;
|
||
a fabio:JournalArticle .
|
||
|
||
<http://taxon-concept.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Chrysemys_Gray_1844>
|
||
dwc:authority "Gray, 1844" ;
|
||
dwc:class "Reptilia" ;
|
||
dwc:family "Emydidae" ;
|
||
dwc:genus "Chrysemys" ;
|
||
dwc:kingdom "Animalia" ;
|
||
dwc:order "Testudines" ;
|
||
dwc:phylum "Chordata" ;
|
||
dwc:rank "genus" ;
|
||
dwc:scientificNameAuthorship "Gray, 1844" ;
|
||
trt:hasTaxonName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Chrysemys> ;
|
||
a dwcFP:TaxonConcept .
|
||
|
||
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Chrysemys>
|
||
dwc:class "Reptilia" ;
|
||
dwc:family "Emydidae" ;
|
||
dwc:genus "Chrysemys" ;
|
||
dwc:kingdom "Animalia" ;
|
||
dwc:order "Testudines" ;
|
||
dwc:phylum "Chordata" ;
|
||
dwc:rank "genus" ;
|
||
trt:hasParentName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Emydidae> ;
|
||
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
|
||
|
||
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Emydidae>
|
||
dwc:family "Emydidae" ;
|
||
dwc:rank "family" ;
|
||
trt:hasParentName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Testudines> ;
|
||
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
|
||
|
||
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Testudines>
|
||
dwc:order "Testudines" ;
|
||
dwc:rank "order" ;
|
||
trt:hasParentName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Reptilia> ;
|
||
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
|
||
|
||
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Reptilia>
|
||
dwc:class "Reptilia" ;
|
||
dwc:rank "class" ;
|
||
trt:hasParentName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Chordata> ;
|
||
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
|
||
|
||
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Chordata>
|
||
dwc:phylum "Chordata" ;
|
||
dwc:rank "phylum" ;
|
||
trt:hasParentName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia> ;
|
||
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
|
||
|
||
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia>
|
||
dwc:kingdom "Animalia" ;
|
||
dwc:rank "kingdom" ;
|
||
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924791>
|
||
dc:description "Figure 8. Strict consensus tree of the phylogenetic relationships of deirochelyine emydids supported by this study based on morphological data constrained by a molecular backbone. See text and Supporting Information (Data S1–S4) for details. Intergeneric relationships of modern taxa constrained based on molecular phylogenetic analysis presented by Spinks et al. (2016: fig. 5). Analysis includes the emydine Clemmys guttata as the outgroup. The tree presented represents the strict consensus tree of deirochelyine relationships found in the phylogenetic analysis of 246 characters within 35 deirochelyines (ingroup taxa). Thickened bars indicate age ranges for fossil taxa. † refers to a fossil or extinct taxon.Tree length equals 881 steps, consistency index equals 0.413, retention index equals 0.515. Numbers beside branches provide the Bremer supports (first) and bootstrap values (second). Numbers are shown for branches with bootstrap values greater than 50." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/7924791/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924793>
|
||
dc:description "Figure 9. Fifty percent majority rule consensus tree of the phylogenetic relationships of deirochelyine emydids supported by this study based on morphological data constrained by a molecular backbone. See text and Supporting Information (Data S1–S4) for details. Intergeneric relationships of modern taxa constrained based on molecular phylogenetic analysis presented by Spinks et al. (2016: fig. 5). Analysis includes the emydine Clemmys guttata as the outgroup. The tree presented represents the 50% majority rule consensus tree of deirochelyine relationships found in the phylogenetic analysis of 246 characters within 35 deirochelyines (ingroup taxa). Thickened bars indicate age ranges for fossil taxa. † refers to a fossil or extinct taxon. Tree length equals 881 steps, consistency index equals 0.413, retention index equals 0.515. Numbers beside branches provide the Bremer supports (first) and the bootstrap values (second). Numbers are shown for branches with bootstrap values greater than 50." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/7924793/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924795>
|
||
dc:description "Figure 10. Fossil occurrencesof C.picta through time, with the modern range shown indarker grey(see/compare with Figure 1). A, movement of C. picta based on fossil occurrences from the Barstovian to the Clarendonian NALMAs. B, movement of C. picta based on fossil occurrences from the Clarendonian to the Hemphillian NALMAs. C, movement of C. picta based on fossil occurrences from the Hemphillian to the Blancan NALMAs. D, movement of C. picta based on fossil occurrences from the Blancan to the Irvingtonian NALMAs. E, movement of C. picta based on fossil occurrences from the Irvingtonian to the Rancholabrean NALMAs. F, movement of C. picta based on fossil occurrences from the Rancholabrean to the Santarosean NALMAs. G, movement of C. picta based on fossil occurrences from the Santarosean to the Saintaugustinean NALMAs. H, extensions to the range of C. picta currently temporally unknown based on lack of fossil evidence. I, range extensions of the genus Chrysemys based on fossil species unique from C. picta, with numbered arrows showing these extensions temporally as beginning with 1 followed by 2 and finally 3. Note: Alachua County, Florida, is shown in (I) representing the fossil localities of ‘C.’ aeilliamsi and a potential new Chrysemys species, although it is not considered part of the expansion as ‘C.’ aeilliamsi probably does not represent Chrysemys (see text) and the potential novel species of Chrysemys has not been thoroughly studied (see Bourque et al., 2007)." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/7924795/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924797>
|
||
dc:description "Figure 11. Life reconstruction of Chrysemys corniculata sp. nov. at the Gray Fossil Site in north-eastern Tennessee during the latest Miocene-earliest Pliocene by Sergey Krasovskiy." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/7924797/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7924789>
|
||
dc:description "Figure 7. Chrysemys carapace comparisons, focusing on the morphology of the anterior edge. A-D, Chrysemys corniculata sp. nov. carapace in dorsal view: A, C. corniculata sp. nov., holotype carapace (ETMNH–12491); B, C. corniculata sp. nov. paratype carapace (ETMNH–20609); C, C. corniculata sp. nov., paratype carapace (ETMNH-20544); D, C. corniculata sp. nov., paratype carapace (ETMNH-3559), with arrow pointing to nuchal horns that occupy the anteromedial portion of marginal 1. E-I, C. picta anterior carapace morphology: E, female C. picta nuchal (UF 48670) in dorsal view; F, male C. picta nuchal (UF 49963) in dorsal view; G, male C. picta anterior carapace (ETVP 9683) in dorsal view with arrow pointing to the marginals 1 portion of the nuchal where the nuchal horns are present as an inconspicuous anterior projection; H, male C. picta anterior carapace with an arrow pointing to the lighter-coloured anterior projections of marginal 1 that would lie above the nuchal horns; I, female C. picta anterior carapace showing no anterior projections. Scale bars: A-D, 5 cm; E-G, 1 cm; H-I, not to scale." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/7924789/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|