115 lines
8.8 KiB
Turtle
115 lines
8.8 KiB
Turtle
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
|
||
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
|
||
@prefix bibo: <http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/> .
|
||
@prefix cito: <http://purl.org/spar/cito/> .
|
||
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/> .
|
||
@prefix dwc: <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/> .
|
||
@prefix dwcFP: <http://filteredpush.org/ontologies/oa/dwcFP#> .
|
||
@prefix fabio: <http://purl.org/spar/fabio/> .
|
||
@prefix trt: <http://plazi.org/vocab/treatment#> .
|
||
@prefix xlink: <http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/> .
|
||
|
||
<http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AA87B99E01FFBEFF1AC258FBB6FF02>
|
||
cito:cites <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287979>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287980>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287981>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287982>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287983>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287984>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287985>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287986>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287987>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287988>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287989> ;
|
||
dc:creator "Kury, Adriano B." ;
|
||
dc:title "Opiliones" ;
|
||
trt:publishedIn <http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3925.3.1> ;
|
||
trt:treatsTaxonName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Opiliones> ;
|
||
a trt:Treatment .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3925.3.1>
|
||
bibo:endPage "340" ;
|
||
bibo:issue "3" ;
|
||
bibo:journal "Zootaxa" ;
|
||
bibo:startPage "301" ;
|
||
bibo:volume "3925" ;
|
||
dc:creator "Kury, Adriano B." ;
|
||
dc:date "2015" ;
|
||
dc:title "Opiliones are no longer the same — on suprafamilial groups in harvestmen (Arthropoda: Arachnida)" ;
|
||
fabio:hasPart <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287979>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287980>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287981>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287982>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287983>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287984>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287985>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287986>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287987>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287988>, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287989> ;
|
||
a fabio:JournalArticle .
|
||
|
||
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Opiliones>
|
||
dwc:class "Arachnida" ;
|
||
dwc:kingdom "Animalia" ;
|
||
dwc:order "Opiliones" ;
|
||
dwc:phylum "Arthropoda" ;
|
||
dwc:rank "order" ;
|
||
trt:hasParentName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Arachnida> ;
|
||
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
|
||
|
||
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Arachnida>
|
||
dwc:class "Arachnida" ;
|
||
dwc:kingdom "Animalia" ;
|
||
dwc:phylum "Arthropoda" ;
|
||
dwc:rank "class" ;
|
||
trt:hasParentName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Arthropoda> ;
|
||
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
|
||
|
||
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia/Arthropoda>
|
||
dwc:kingdom "Animalia" ;
|
||
dwc:phylum "Arthropoda" ;
|
||
dwc:rank "phylum" ;
|
||
trt:hasParentName <http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia> ;
|
||
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
|
||
|
||
<http://taxon-name.plazi.org/id/Animalia>
|
||
dwc:kingdom "Animalia" ;
|
||
dwc:rank "kingdom" ;
|
||
a dwcFP:TaxonName .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287979>
|
||
dc:description "FIGURE 1. Hypothesis O 1 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Latreille 1802). The clade which is today called Opiliones (in blue, below) was originally called “ Phalangiens ” (in green, above). Members of the Laniatores and of the Ischyropsalidoidea were then unknown. The name Phalangida (as many others) has undergone a change of circumscription over time." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287979/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287980>
|
||
dc:description "FIGURE 2. Hypothesis O 2 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Sundevall 1833). The original concept of the Opiliones (“ Opiliones ” in green) excluded the Cyphophthalmi (here represented by Siro). This group is currently called Phalangida (in blue). Ischyropsalis was still to be unknown for 6 years." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287980/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287981>
|
||
dc:description "FIGURE 3. Hypothesis O 3 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Thorell 1876). Thorell created the name Palpatores (green) as opposed to the also new group Laniatores (here represented by Gonyleptes). Thorell’s Palpatores is currently called Cyphopalpatores Martens (blue), a name coined a century later, while the name Palpatores is used for another group (see Fig. 4 below). Thorell also recognized what later was to be known as Dyspnoi (blue), following Sørensen (1873)." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287981/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287982>
|
||
dc:description "FIGURE 4. Hypothesis O 4 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Simon 1879). Simon was the first to define a group that he called Plagiostethi (green), as opposed to the Mecostethi (here represented by Gonyleptes and identical to Thorell’s Laniatores). This name as of today has been abandoned in favor of a different usage of the name Palpatores Thorell." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287982/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287983>
|
||
dc:description "FIGURE 5. Hypothesis O 5 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Pocock 1902). Pocock suggested a group formed by today’s Phalangioidea + Ischyropsalidoidea, thus introducing the name and the concept of Apagosterni. Loman (1903) was the first to accept this clade, which alternately lost and regained favor, but endured for a century." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287983/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287984>
|
||
dc:description "FIGURE 6. Hypothesis O 6 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Hansen & Sørensen 1904). The Danes kept the solid Plagiostethi (= “ Palpatores ” in blue) and dismantled the Apagosterni resurrecting and firstly naming Thorell’s Dyspnoi as opposed to the Eupnoi. This hypothesis was also defended by Roewer (1923) and Shear (1975) and became the classic triad of the 20 th century: Cyphophthalmi, Palpatores and Laniatores." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287984/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287985>
|
||
dc:description "FIGURE 7. Hypothesis O 7 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Mello-Leitão 1944). This author combined some older hypotheses such as the dichotomy Laniatores versus Palpatores (still using the original Thorell’s concept) and reintroduced the Apagosterni." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287985/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287986>
|
||
dc:description "FIGURE 8. Hypothesis O 8 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Šilhavý 1961). This author presented a hypothesis with very little information putting almost all groups as coordinate categories." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287986/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287987>
|
||
dc:description "FIGURE 9. Hypothesis O 9 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Martens 1980, morphological, non-numerical). By the end of the 20 th century, the original concept of Palpatores was lost, so that a hypothesis recovering this clade received the new name Cyphopalpatores Martens. This was the first cladistic analysis of the Opiliones." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287987/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287988>
|
||
dc:description "FIGURE 10. Hypothesis O 10 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Shultz 1998, morph). This analysis recovered the old Sundevall’s concept (Cyphophthalmi versus Phalangida), and Simon’s Plagiostethi (by then already universally called “ Palpatores ”). Within Palpatores, he recognized the Dyspnoi, burying the Apagosterni. Surprisingly, a molecular analysis by Shultz & Regier (2001, mol) recovered the same configuration. After some analyses which did not recover the Palpatores (see hypothesis K in Fig. 11 below), Giribet et al. (2010, mol) obtained the same pattern." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287988/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|
||
|
||
<http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.287989>
|
||
dc:description "FIGURE 11. Hypothesis O 11 of phylogeny of the Opiliones (Giribet et al. 1999, comb; 2002, comb). Following his 1997 thesis, Giribet recovered the early branching off for the Cyphophthalmi and resurrected the name Phalangida for its sister group. A new clade was also firstly proposed and named, causing the diphyly of the Palpatores—the Dyspnolaniatores. Both this hypothesis and J are the modern contrasting views of the deep relationships among Opiliones groups." ;
|
||
fabio:hasRepresentation <https://zenodo.org/record/287989/files/figure.png> ;
|
||
a fabio:Figure .
|