Lowe, Graeme; Yağmur, Ersen Aydın; Kovařík, František
Leiurus haenggii Lowe & Yağmur & Kovařík 2014, sp. n.
A review of the genus Leiurus Ehrenberg, 1828 (Scorpiones: Buthidae) with description of four new species from the Arabian Peninsula
Figure 46: Morphometric differentiation between female Leiurus arabicus sp. n. and L. haenggii sp. n. A. Scatter plot of the compound morphometric ratio (slenderness factor) Fs = a.b.c (where a = metasoma III L/W, b = pedipalp patella L/W, c = leg III patella L/D) vs. Carapace L (N = 30 L. arabicus, N = 43 L. haenggii). The distribution of ratios of the two species were overlapped for juveniles and young, and were increasingly separated in subadults and adults, as segments of L. arabicus become more slender by allometric growth. B, C, D. Log-log scatter plots of metasoma III L vs. W, pedipalp patella L vs. W, and leg III patella L vs. D, respectively. Linear regression was applied separately to data sets split into upper and lower size ranges for each species (red lines). Numbers show fitted slope ± standard deviation (SD), with SD ranges in brackets. Slopes were similar between L. arabicus and L. haenggii over the lower size range, and diverged over the upper size range. For all three segments, allometry was significantly diphasic in L. arabicus, and only weakly so, or monophasic, in L. haenggii.
Figure 58: Hemispermatophores of new Leiurus species. A. L. macroctenus sp. n., paratype male, Duhai, Oman. B. L. heberti sp. n., holotype male, Wadi Andur, Oman. C. L. haenggii sp. n., paratype male, Jabal Qara, Oman. Distal portions hemispermatophores illustrated to show flagellum and lobes (right hemispermatophores, convex aspect). Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figure 59: Chelicerae of Leiurus species. A, B. L. macroctenus sp. n., paratype male, Thumrait, Oman. Right chelicera, ventral (A) and dorsal (B) aspect. C, D. L. haenggii sp. n., paratype male, Jabal Qara, Oman. Right chelicera, ventral (C) and dorsal (D) aspect. E, F. L. brachycentrus (Ehrenberg, 1829), female, Al Mansuriah, Yemen. Right chelicera, ventral (E) and dorsal (F) aspect. G, H. L. heberti sp. n., holotype male, Wadi Andur, Oman. Right chelicera, ventral (G) and dorsal (H) aspect. Scale bar in A: 1 mm (also applies to B–H).
Figure 87: Metasoma V and telson of Leiurus spp. Males, lateral aspect. A. L. abdullahbayrami Yağmur, Koç et Kunt, 2009. B. L. arabicus sp. n.. C. L. brachycentrus (Ehrenberg, 1829) stat. n.. D. L. haenggii sp. n. E. L. heberti sp. n. F. L. hebraeus (Birula, 1908) stat. n.. G. L. macroctenus sp. n.. H. L. quinquestriatus (Ehrenberg, 1828). Locality data as in Figs. 9, 20, 31, 43, 55, 67, 79. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Figure 88: Metasoma V and telson of Leiurus spp. Males, ventral aspect. A. L. abdullahbayrami Yağmur, Koç et Kunt, 2009. B. L. arabicus sp. n.. C. L. brachycentrus (Ehrenberg, 1829) stat. n.. D. L. haenggii sp. n.. E. L. heberti sp. n. F. L. hebraeus (Birula, 1908) stat. n.. G. L. macroctenus sp. n.. H. L. quinquestriatus (Ehrenberg, 1828). Locality data as in Figs. 9, 20, 31, 43, 55, 67, 79. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Figure 89: Metasoma V and telson of Leiurus spp. Females, lateral aspect. A. L. abdullahbayrami Yağmur, Koç et Kunt, 2009. B. L. arabicus sp. n. C. L. brachycentrus (Ehrenberg, 1829) stat. n. D. L. haenggii sp. n. E. L. heberti sp. n. F. L. hebraeus (Birula, 1908) stat. n. G. L. macroctenus sp. n. H. L. quinquestriatus (Ehrenberg, 1828). Locality data as in Figs. 9, 20, 31, 43, 55, 67, 79. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Figure 90: Metasoma V and telson of Leiurus spp. Females, ventral aspect. A. L. abdullahbayrami Yağmur, Koç et Kunt, 2009. B. L. arabicus sp. n. C. L. brachycentrus (Ehrenberg, 1829) stat. n.. D. L. haenggii sp. n. E. L. heberti sp. n. F. L. hebraeus (Birula, 1908) stat. n. G. L. macroctenus sp. n. H. L. quinquestriatus (Ehrenberg, 1828). Locality data as in Figs. 9, 20, 31, 43, 55, 67, 79. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Figure 91: Pigmentation patterns of metasoma IV, V of Leiurus species, ventral aspect. A. L. haenggii sp. n., holotype female, Ta’if, Saudi Arabia (NHMB 17k). B. L. macroctenus sp. n., holotype male, Thumrait, Oman. C. L. heberti sp. n., holotype male, Wadi Andur, Oman. D. L. quinquestriatus (Ehrenberg, 1828), female, Cairo, Egypt (NHMB 17d). E. L. brachycentrus (Ehrenberg, 1829) stat. n., male, Ad Darb, Saudi Arabia (NHMB 17ag). F. L. arabicus sp. n., holotype female, Kushm Dibi, Saudi Arabia (NHMB 17aq). G. L. hebraeus (Birula, 1908) stat. n., female, Israel (NHMB 17a). H. L. abdullahbayrami Yağmur, Koç et Kunt, 2009, male, Eski Sarkaya Village, Turkey. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Figure 92: Sternite III of Leiurus spp., female. A. L. abdullahbayrami Yağmur, Koç et Kunt, 2009, Caybasi Village, Turkey. B. L. arabicus sp. n., holotype, Kushm Dibi, Saudi Arabia (NHMB 17aq). C. L. arabicus sp. n., paratype, Al Amar, Bahrain (NHMB 17bg). D. L. heberti sp. n., paratype, Jabal Samhan. Oman. E. L. haenggii sp. n., paratype, Wadi Turabah, Saudi Arabia (NHMB 17al). F. L. haenggii sp. n., paratype, Adnan, Saudi Arabia (NHMB 17am). G. L. brachycentrus (Ehrenberg, 1829) stat. n., Al Mansuriah, Yemen. H. L. macroctenus sp. n., paratype, Masirah Island, Oman. I. L. macroctenus sp. n., paratype, Thumrait, Oman. J. L. quinquestriatus (Ehrenberg, 1828), Kharga Oasis, Egypt (NHMB 17i). K. L. hebraeus (Birula, 1908) stat. n., Israel (NHMB 17a). L. L. jordanensis Lourenço, Modry et Amr, 2002, al-Tawil, Saudi Arabia.
Figure 93: Medial intercarinal areas of tergite III of female Leiurus spp. A. L. arabicus sp. n., paratype, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. B. L. arabicus sp. n., paratype, Wadi Khumrah, Saudi Arabia (NHMB 17bj). C. L. haenggii sp. n., paratype, Yemen. D. L. haenggii sp. n., paratype, Wadi Maraba, Saudi Arabia (NHMB 17al). E. L. heberti sp. n., paratype, Jabal Samhan. Oman. F. L. abdullahbayrami Yağmur, Koç et Kunt, 2009, Caybasi Village, Turkey. G. L. brachycentrus (Ehrenberg, 1829) stat. n., Al Mansuriah, Yemen. H. L. macroctenus sp. n., paratype, Masirah Island, Oman. I. L. hebraeus (Birula, 1908) stat. n., Israel (NHMB 17a). J. L. hebraeus Birula, 1908, Kurayyima, Jordan. K. L. quinquestriatus (Ehrenberg, 1828), Kharga Oasis, Egypt (NHMB 17i). L. L. jordanensis Lourenço, Modry et Amr, 2002, al-Tawil, Saudi Arabia.
Figure 94: Comparative analysis of granulation on tergite III of female Leiurus. A. UV fluorescence image of tergite III medial intercarinal surface of L. quinquestriatus (Egypt). B. Mask of granulation pattern on medial intercarinal surface from image in Figure 94A. C. Enlarged view of tergite III granulation in rectangular area indicated in Figure 94A. Granules were identified as local maxima of fluorescence intensity with contour shadows cast by directional UV illumination, and were modeled by elliptical regions-of-interest (ROIs). Parameters of granule ROIs were measured in ImageJ 1.44 (Rasband, 1997–2011). Area of granulometric analysis was restricted to surfaces bounded by the lateral and posterior marginal carinae, and a line passing through oblique, anterior transverse rows of enlarged granules (granules along carinae and bounding lines were omitted). D. Scatter plot of mean granule diameter vs. total granule area for 4 species of Leiurus (L. arabicus sp. n., L. haenggii sp. n., L. hebraeus stat. n. and L. quinquestriatus). Each point represents granulometric data derived from tergite III of one scorpion specimen (bilaterally, as shown in Figure 94B). Data were extracted from 18,423 ROIs from 36 scorpions. For each specimen, total granule area (a measure of density of granulation) was computed as sum of areas of all ROIs, and mean ROI diameter (a measure of coarseness of granulation) as the mean value of the maximum diameters of all granule ROIs. For comparative analysis, images from different size scorpions were resampled to equalize the distance between left and right posterior marginal granules of the lateral carinae (arbitrarily set to 4,000 units or pixels; linear dimensions expressed as [pixel], areas as [pixel2]). The total granule area separated the species into 2 groups: i.e. sparsely granulated (L. arabicus, L. haenggii) and densely granulated (L. hebraeus, L. quinquestriatus). In contrast, the distributions of ROI diameter were broadly overlapping. E. To obtain a more sensitive comparison of the coarseness of granulation, normalized cumulative distributions of single ROI areas for 3 species of Leiurus were computed (inset indicates number of scorpions analyzed). Relative horizontal positions of these curves indicated increasing coarseness of granulation, in rank order: L. haenggii <L. quinquestriatus <L. hebraeus (Ngranules = 2103, 5202, 2190 respectively). This ranking was confirmed by a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test which detected significant differences between the distributions of log (granule area) (P <0.001).
Figure 95: Variation in key diagnostic biometrics of adult Leiurus spp. A. Cumulative distributions of position of trichobothrium db relative to est on pedipalp fixed finger for: L. abdullahbayrami (53), L. brachycentrus stat. n. (11), L. hebraeus stat. n. (38), L. macroctenus sp. n. (176), L. quinquestriatus (61), L. haenggii sp. n. (158), L. arabicus sp. n. (87) (number of fingers measured in parentheses). Data for males and females were pooled. The db–est distances were normalized to pedipalp movable finger length (chord length from finger tip to external articular condyle), with positive values indicating db distal to est, negative values indicating db proximal to est. Distributions of L. haenggii (µ = 0.06367) and L. arabicus sp. n. (µ = 0.06671) were not significantly different (P = 0.405148, t test), indicating a close relationship between these species. Distribution of L. quinquestriatus (µ = 0.047313) was significantly different from those of L. haenggii and L. arabicus (P = 0.000102 and 0.000030 respectively). B. Scatter plot of morphometric ratios of mid-pectine sensillar margin L (MPSM, indicated in inset) to metasoma I W, and to carapace L, showing differences in relative pectinal tooth size in females of nine species of Leiurus. C. A subset of the female data in Figure 95B, plotted as cumulative distributions of morphometric ratio of mid-pectine sensillar margin L to metasoma I W. Distributions of L. haenggii (µ = 0.102268) and L. arabicus (µ = 0.10432) were not significantly different (P> 0.1, K-S test). D. Scatter plot of morphometric ratios of mid-pectine sensillar margin L to metasoma I W (relative size of pectine teeth), and metasoma II L/W (slenderness of metasoma II) for females of nine species of Leiurus. A, C, D: symbol key as in Figure 95B.