Lasioglossum (Dialictus) profundum Gardner & Gibbs 2023, sp. nov.
Revision of the Nearctic species of the Lasioglossum (Dialictus) gemmatum species complex (Hymenoptera: Halictidae)
Fig. 76. Male genitalia illustrated in dorsal view and positioned such that the gonostylus is parallel to the plane of vision. Retrorse lobes are also illustrated separately to the bottom left of each figure in lateral view, positioned parallel to the plane of vision. A. Lasioglossum (D.) angelicum sp. nov.B. L. (D.) coactus (Cresson, 1872). C. L. (D.) deludens sp. nov. D. L. (D.) diabolicum sp. nov.E. L. (D.) gaudiale (Sandhouse, 1924). F. L. (D.) gloriosum sp. nov. (the retrorse lobe was not visible for illustration). G. L. (D.) helianthi (Cockerell, 1916). H. L. (D.) holzenthali sp. nov. I. L. (D.) indagator sp. nov. J. L. (D.) magnitegula sp. nov. K. L. (D.) perparvum (Ellis, 1914). L. L. (D.) profoundum sp. nov. M. L. (D.) pseudotegulare (Cockerell, 1896). N. L. (D.) rufodeludens sp. nov. This genital capsule was damaged during dissection and some details may be slightly distorted.O. L. (D.) stictaspis (Sandhouse, 1923) (holotype) (reproduced from Gardner & Gibbs 2022). P. L. (D.) tegulariforme (Crawford, 1907) (reproduced from Gardner & Gibbs 2022). Scale bars = 0.25 mm.
Fig. 81. Tegula.A. Lasioglossum profundum sp. nov., ♀, impunctate. B. L. holzenthali sp. nov., ♀, sparsely punctate. C. L. stictaspis (Sandhouse, 1923), ♀, densely punctate. Scale bars = 0.25 mm.
Fig. 82. Ventral surface of head showing postgena. A. Lasioglossum profundum sp. nov., ♀, smooth and shiny. B. L. coactus (Cresson, 1872), ♀, dull and lineolate. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 50. Georeferenced collection records of Lasioglossum (D.) profundum sp. nov. (black squares) and predicted distribution by maximum entropy ecological niche modelling in Maxent (colour shading). Warmer colours indicate higher cloglog probability of occurrence.
D. J. Brothers & Krueger & Charles D. Michener
Terry L. Griswold & J. D. Herndon & A. Druk