Revision of the Palaearctic Trachusa interrupta species complex (Apoidea: Anthidiini) with description of four new species
FIGURE 7. Comparison of the pattern of the yellow colouration among females of T. taurica sp. n., T. grandicornis sp. n., T. anatolica sp. n., and T. heinzi.
FIGURE 11. Pattern of the yellow bands on T1–T3 in the female of T. grandicornis sp. n. in comparison with T. anatolica sp. n., T. interrupta and T. taurica sp. n.
FIGURE 26. Trachusa interrupta. A. Female (France); B. male (Greece).
FIGURE 14. Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) for 15 morphometric parameters of six species of the Trachusa interrupta complex (the two north African species T. varia and T. maghrebensis are left out not to overload the diagram). A: females, B: males.
FIGURE 28. Differences in the antenna lengths between various Operational Units (OUs) of Trachusa interrupta. The OUs are shown in Fig. 29. The y-axis gives the average length of antennal segments Sg4–Sg6.
FIGURE 29. Distribution of Trachusa interrupta, T. maghrebensis sp. n. and T. varia. A record of T. interrupta from Hotan, China, which is far outside the known range and in need of confirmation is not shown on the map. The dotted lines show the limits of Operational Units (OUs) of T. interrupta which were defined for testing population differences. Ukraine was not assigned to an OU as the test was based on males only and only a female is known from there.
FIGURE 42. Distribution of the species of the Trachusa interrupta complex. The map shows the distribution schematically.