dc:description"Figure 94. Generic membership and phylogenetic position of tribe Campsiandreae. For description of phylogeny and support values, see Fig. 6 caption (page 63).";
dc:description"Figure 95. Flower, fruit and vegetative characters of tribe Campsiandreae A foliage and fruits, Campsiandra comosa Benth., Brazil B compound inflorescence, Campsiandra angustifolia Spruce ex Benth., Peru C fruit and seed, Campsiandra laurifolia Benth., cultivated Rio de Janeiro Botanic Gardens, Brazil D inflorescence and foliage, Campsiandra sp., Amazonas, Brazil E-I Dinizia jueirana facao G. P. Lewis & G. S. Siqueira, Reserva Natural Vale, Espirito Santo, Brazil E foliage and fruits F trunk and crown of mature tree G inflorescences H mature fruits (hand for scale) I rough bark of trunk. Photo credits A D Cardoso B T Pennington D M Falcao E, G, I D Folli C, F, H GP Lewis.";
dc:description"Figure 96. Distribution of Campsiandra based on quality-controlled digitised herbarium records. See Suppl. material 1 for the source of occurrence data.";
dc:description"Figure 97. Distribution of Dinizia based on quality-controlled digitised herbarium records. See Suppl. material 1 for the source of occurrence data.";
dc:description"Figure 6. Generic relationships in tribe Ceratonieae. Left part of figure shows complete genus-level Caesalpinioideae phylogeny with the Ceratonieae indicated with a red rectangle. Branch lengths are expressed in coalescent units and terminal branches were assigned an arbitrary uniform length for visual clarity. Support for relationships is based on fractions of supporting and conflicting gene trees: pie charts show gene tree support and conflict per node (blue representing supporting gene trees, green gene trees supporting the most common alternative topology, red gene trees supporting further alternative topologies, grey gene trees uninformative for this node), and numbers above pie charts are Internode Certainty All support values [both calculated with PhyParts (Smith et al. 2015)]. If present, red numbers below pie charts are non-significant (i. e.> 0.05) outcomes of ASTRAL's polytomy test (Sayyari and Mirarab 2018), which tests for each node whether the polytomy null model can be rejected. Monophyletic genera are represented by single branches; see Suppl. material 2 for a phylogeny with all accessions. See Suppl. material 3 for gene tree support across the phylogeny. The phylogeny is a pruned version of the backbone phylogeny of Ringelberg et al. (2023), where full details of the data and phylogenomic analysis methods are presented.";
