dc:description"Figure 7. Flower, fruit, and vegetative characters of tribe Ceratonieae A Arcoa gonavensis Urb., foliage and fruits, Dominican Republic B Tetrapterocarpon geayi Humbert, fruits and part of bipinnate leaf, Madagascar (Du Puy M 410) C-E Acrocarpus fraxinifolius Wight & Arn., India, cultivated tree C inflorescence D dehisced fruits and new flush foliage E part of a bipinnate leaf F-J Ceratonia siliqua L. F tree, Jordan, semi-desert near Petra G fruits, Israel, Mt. Scopus Botanical Gardens, Jerusalem H pistillate flowers, Crete I staminate flowers, Crete J staminate inflorescences, Israel, Jerusalem Botanical Gardens. Photo credits A F Jimenez R. B D Du Puy C-E https: // efloraofindia. com / 2011 / 02 / 01 / acrocarpus-fraxinifolius / E D Valke F, G, J O Fragman-Sapir H, I G Lewis.";
dc:description"Figure 9. Distribution of Tetrapterocarpon based on quality-controlled digitised herbarium records. See Suppl. material 1 for the source of occurrence data.";
dc:description"Figure 6. Generic relationships in tribe Ceratonieae. Left part of figure shows complete genus-level Caesalpinioideae phylogeny with the Ceratonieae indicated with a red rectangle. Branch lengths are expressed in coalescent units and terminal branches were assigned an arbitrary uniform length for visual clarity. Support for relationships is based on fractions of supporting and conflicting gene trees: pie charts show gene tree support and conflict per node (blue representing supporting gene trees, green gene trees supporting the most common alternative topology, red gene trees supporting further alternative topologies, grey gene trees uninformative for this node), and numbers above pie charts are Internode Certainty All support values [both calculated with PhyParts (Smith et al. 2015)]. If present, red numbers below pie charts are non-significant (i. e.> 0.05) outcomes of ASTRAL's polytomy test (Sayyari and Mirarab 2018), which tests for each node whether the polytomy null model can be rejected. Monophyletic genera are represented by single branches; see Suppl. material 2 for a phylogeny with all accessions. See Suppl. material 3 for gene tree support across the phylogeny. The phylogeny is a pruned version of the backbone phylogeny of Ringelberg et al. (2023), where full details of the data and phylogenomic analysis methods are presented.";
