dc:description"Figure 3. Cladogram of the Bayesian consensus tree of Cercomacra from the ten-partition model analysis (−lnL = 37320.48, 1stND2[GTR+G], 2ndND2[TVM+I+G], 3rdND2[HKY+G], 1stND3[SYM+G], 2ndND3[TIM3+I+G], 3rdND3[TIM1+G], 1stCYTB[GTR+I+G], 2ndCYTB[TIM2+I+G], 3rdCYTB[GTR+I+G], FIB5[TIM3+G]). Support values correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap values of the single-partition model ML tree (−lnL = 39246.13, HKY+I+G), respectively. Nodes that uncovered ingroup relationships are numbered 1–14.";
dc:description"Figure 5. Trees showing incongruent topologies within the ‘tyrannina’ clade. The number of mitochondrial and nuclear substitutions supporting those topologies is showed below the branches. Numbers above the branches represent Bayesian posterior probabilities and maximum-likelihood bootstraps.";
dc:description"Figure 4. Resulting phylograms of the Bayesian consensus trees of Cercomacra from the separate analyses of concatenated mitochondrial (A) and FIB5 (B) data sets. A, phylogram of Bayesian consensus tree from the concatenated mitochondrial nine-partition model analysis (1stND2[GTR+G], 2ndND2[TVM+I+G], 3rdND2[HKY+G], 1stND3[SYM+G], 2ndND3[TIM3+I+G], 3rdND3[TIM1+G], 1stCYTB[GTR+I+G], 2ndCYTB[TIM2+I+G], 3rdCYTB[GTR+I+G]). B, phylogram of Bayesian consensus tree from the FIB5 single-partition model analysis (TIM3+G). Support values correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities and ML bootstrap values, respectively. Numbered nodes represent those also found in the concatenated analysis. Incongruent nodes between the mitochondrial (node 15) and FIB5 (nodes 11 and 12) trees are marked with asterisks.";
