dc:description"Figure 13. Gleditsieae, diversity of vegetative morphology and fruits A-C Umtiza listeriana Sim A small tree B branch with pinnately compound leaves and inflorescence C branch with thorn at node D Gymnocladus assamicus Kanjilal ex P. C. Kanjilal branch with bipinnate leaves and inflorescence E Gleditsia japonica Miq., bipinnate leaf with several pinnae replaced by single leaflets, cultivated at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew F Gleditsia amorphoides (Griseb.) Taub., branched thorns G Umtiza listeriana dehisced fruits H Gymnocladus dioicus L., fruit I Gleditsia triacanthos L., fruits. Photo credits A-C, G SAplants, Wikimedia Commons (CC-BY-SA 4.0) D B Choudhury E, F GP Lewis H Chicago Botanic Garden (photographer unknown) I A Schnabel.";
dc:description"Figure 14. Gleditsieae, floral diversity A, B Umtiza listeriana Sim A branch with inflorescence of hermaphrodite flowers B close-up of flowers C, D Gymnocladus assamicus Kanjilal ex P. C. Kanjilal C inflorescence of hermaphrodite flowers D dissected hermaphrodite flower E Gymnocladus chinensis Baill., inflorescence, cultivated at the US National Arboretum F Gymnocladus dioicus L., cultivated at Chicago Botanic Garden, upright inflorescence of hermaphrodite flowers G branch with leaves and inflorescence H Gleditsia triacanthos L., inflorescence of staminate flowers I Gleditsia caspica Desf., inflorescence, cultivated at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Photo credits A, B SAplants, Wikimedia Commons (CC-BY-SA 4.0) C, D Murata E PS Herendeen F, G R Carlson H Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (photographer unknown) I M Svanderlik.";
dc:description"Figure 15. Distribution of Umtiza based on quality-controlled digitised herbarium records. See Suppl. material 1 for the source of occurrence data.";
dc:description"Figure 16. Distribution of Gymnocladus based on quality-controlled digitised herbarium records. See Suppl. material 1 for the source of occurrence data.";
dc:description"Figure 17. Distribution of Gleditsia based on quality-controlled digitised herbarium records. See Suppl. material 1 for the source of occurrence data.";
dc:description"Figure 6. Generic relationships in tribe Ceratonieae. Left part of figure shows complete genus-level Caesalpinioideae phylogeny with the Ceratonieae indicated with a red rectangle. Branch lengths are expressed in coalescent units and terminal branches were assigned an arbitrary uniform length for visual clarity. Support for relationships is based on fractions of supporting and conflicting gene trees: pie charts show gene tree support and conflict per node (blue representing supporting gene trees, green gene trees supporting the most common alternative topology, red gene trees supporting further alternative topologies, grey gene trees uninformative for this node), and numbers above pie charts are Internode Certainty All support values [both calculated with PhyParts (Smith et al. 2015)]. If present, red numbers below pie charts are non-significant (i. e.> 0.05) outcomes of ASTRAL's polytomy test (Sayyari and Mirarab 2018), which tests for each node whether the polytomy null model can be rejected. Monophyletic genera are represented by single branches; see Suppl. material 2 for a phylogeny with all accessions. See Suppl. material 3 for gene tree support across the phylogeny. The phylogeny is a pruned version of the backbone phylogeny of Ringelberg et al. (2023), where full details of the data and phylogenomic analysis methods are presented.";
